Loading...
286179 (AR)FIELD OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY BUILDING PERMIT ,�„ , 1 F M A M 1 J A S O N D PERMIT NO79 286 1 "Now. \+V VMI 1 Vi RIYCR5IVC 76 77 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE VALUAMON NO. ELECTRICAL FEES DST NO. PLUMBING FEES 1ST FL. 2ND FL. FOR. GAR. CAR P. SQ. WALL SQ. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SQ. FT. @ i $ . UNITS ,'78 SQ. FT. @ YARD SPKLR SYSTEM SQ. FT. @ MOBILEHOME SVC. BAR SINK SQ. FT. @ i POWER OUTLET ROOF DRAINS SUPP, TO PERMIT FT. @ DRAINAGE PIPING N FT. @ DRINKING FOUNTAIN SQ. FT. @ URINAL VALUATION $qaWATER PIPING NOTE: Not to be used as property tax valuation I SWIM POOL, PVT 861 FLOOR DRAIN 79 MICROFILM FEE MECHANICAL FEES $ ISWIM POOL, COMM BOOK PAGE PARC L WATER SOFTENER VENT SYSTEM FAN ❑ EVAP. COOL ❑ HOOD 149 11L SIGN ,� WASHER(AUTO ) , $ APPLIANCE gKDRYER USE NO. ZONE SET BACKS GARBAGE DISPOSAL G'`R•(P� TYPE FURNACE ❑ UNIT ❑ WALL ❑ FLOOR ❑ SUSPENDED 1, 35f t LAUNDRY TRAY AIR HANDLING UNIT CFM IDLE METER KITCHEN SINK ABSORPTION SYSTEM B.T.U. TEMP USE PERM SVC WATER CLOSET > COMPRESSOR`S HP s / POLE, TEMP/PERM LAVATORY HEATING SYSTEM [FORCED ❑ GRAVITY PLAN CHECK FEE AMPERES SERV ENT $ SHOWER BOND AMT. PLAN NO. BOILER B.T.U. �` INS SQ.FT. @ a ' 4 BATH TUB ° SQ. FT. @ a -( 1 WATER HEATER (jSQ.FT.RESID @ l Y<¢ SEWAGE DISPOSAL CONSTRUCTION FEE DBL$ SQ.FT.GAR @ 3/aa 'j HOUSE SEWER BRANCH OFFICE NO LENDINVOLVED 010E GAS PIPING ELECTRICAL FEE DBL PERMIT FEE 3*� PERMIT FEE O PERMIT FEE DBL. TOTAL S MOB.Hi . MICRO FEE MECH. FEE Q /tIt . CK. FEE 31, CONST. FEE 00 ELECT. FEE SMI FEE / FEE PLUMB. FEE 1 F M A M 1 J A S O N D JOB ADDRESS SP NO OWNER 76 77 COMMUNITY VALUAMON DATE DST OFFICE $ ,'78 fM H PERMIT FEE $ USE PERMIT 440d /3 IA?40m FC SUPP, TO PERMIT PE MIT N I 861 79 MICROFILM FEE COPIES $ BOOK PAGE PARC L LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,� MECHANICAL FEE DBL $ USE NO. ZONE SET BACKS LOOT SIZE G'`R•(P� TYPE CK BY 1, 35f t 1t s / iFIiNAL PLAN CHECK FEE $ BOND AMT. PLAN NO. PLAN CHECKER �` INS EC OR ' ° -( 1 CONSTRUCTION FEE DBL$ NAME OF CONST. LENDER BRANCH OFFICE NO LENDINVOLVED 010E ELECTRICAL FEE DBL $ ADDRESS CITY STATE �a s 7 ! -1 bwl STRONG MOTION $ OWNER/AGENTS SIGNATURE C RAC70R INSTRUMENTATION FEE SPECIAL INSP $ ADDRESS ADDRESS DEMOLITION �l FEE REGISTRATION 9.2 PLUMBING FEE DBL $ CITY ZIP CODE CITY ZIP CODE 97 TOTAL FEES %rt�^�y 41r. TEL. NO. AREA CODE TEL. NO. EAA CCODE AR7/e/ LICENSE 4 .CASH❑CHEC M.O•❑N.C.Is �-+ ' 3 r �5-s�r / j RECEIVED BY TREES REQUIRED ,�a SHALL BECOME VOID IF WORK IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS. CESSATION OFORK 0 DAYS SHALL ALSO CAUSE PERMIT TO BECOME VOID. �RMff SEWAGE SYSTEM IHRREE THATALL WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PERMITWILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE T LL P S OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, I ALSO AGREE TO CARRY PEN ATION INSURANCE UPON MY EMPLOYEES. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ALIFORMA COVERING CONTRACTORS IS ALSO GUARANTEED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INDIVIDUAL WHO PREPARED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAS DONE FORM 2B4-108 IREV. 6-761 SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5541 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TH. August 3, 2007 Mr. Stephen R. Nieto South West Concepts 78120 Calle Estado — Suite 206 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: VILLAGE. USE PERMIT 2007-037 (SUBMITTED ON 7/6/07) A&M CONSTRUCTION - 78070 CALLE CADIZ Dear Mr. Nieto: Staff has reviewed, for completeness, the application materials and exhibits submitted for the above referenced project, as required by Government Code Section 65943, and the City Municipal Code. At this time, the application -is incomplete to begin processing. The intent of this letter is to provide you with a list of required information necessary to make the application complete. CEQA COMPLIANCE An environmental assessment will not be required, as the project* can be considered a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects), in conjunction with provisions for a parking management agreement as outlined in this letter. OUTSTANDING REQUIRED INFORMATION Plot Plan 91-463 was never approved for conversion of the single family use to office use. A special inspection, as required in ou.r.preliminary review letter to you dated 4/28/06, shall be conducted by the Building and Safety Department, to determine if improvements to date were installed according to applicable codes. Until the special inspection is completed, the Planning Department cannot complete processing of the application. 2. Provide a copy of a preliminary title report for the property, dated no more than 90 days prior to the date of the application submittal. 3. a 'preliminary grading plan and hydrology%drain age analysis may be required for the site. Please contact the Public Works Department for their current requirements. At a 4. Provide 20 copies of the plan set originally submitted on July 6, 2007, along with 20 reduction sets at 11x17 -inches. An existing conditions site plan shall be provided as an additional sheet to those plans, showing the existing floor plan, site, ant e%tjrgco�rrler}t4s �'Ao����IEeO��lZ92247-1504 78-495 CALLC TAMPICO • LA QUANTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (760) 777-7000 -FAX (760) 777-7101. i43 r °J 5. Provide a concept lighting plan for the building, landscaping, pedestrian walkway and parking areas to be submitted. The .plan must specify lighting types, design, light sources, height, shielding provisions, and luminaries for all lighting as . proposed. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 9.100.150 and 9.150.080. K. of the-LQMC. 6. Prior to the project being scheduled for Planning Commission review, provide one full size rolled set of colored elevation, site and landscape drawings, and one 11x17 -inch reduction set, along with a material and . color sample board(s). In addition, a CD of all graphics will be required. DESIGN ISSUES Based on the plans as submitted, Planning staff would like to schedule a meeting regarding design of this project. We have several concerns about this area of the Village and how it will be developed. Please contact the Planning Department so that we can schedule a time to go over the project submittal. 7. Parking Options — The City currently requires 100% compliance with on-site parking requirements. The Municipal Zoning Code allows for. consideration of various options, in any combination, for compliance with these parking requirements, as follows: A. Provide adequate on-site parking, or provide a combination of on and off- site parking pursuant to Section 9.150.030 of the Municipal Zoning Code. B. Provide sufficient justification as to why the standard number of required parking spaces does not apply to this project, and specify an. alternative methodology pursuant to Sections 9.150.050 and/or 9.150.070 of the Municipal Zoning Code. C. Request a reduction in parking, through execution of a parking agreement as detailed in Section 9.150.050.D of the Municipal Zoning Code. Terms and conditions of the agreement would be subject to conceptual approval prior to any final action on the proposed project. Parking Required — The LQMC provides that all required parking be determined based. on the gross floor area (GFA) of a building, as defined by ordinance. Based on the information on your plans, the total required parking for the 5,896 square feet of office space is 24 spaces, calculated as general office. Your site plan provides for 20 spaces, leaving a deficiency of 4 spaces. In addition, the parking along the front of the building off Calle Cadiz will need to be eliminated or redesigned, as it is inconsistent with the Village at La Quinta Design Guidelines for pedestrian accessibility and parking location. The adjacent property to the west (Galati Enterprises) has also submitted VUP 2007-036 application and is facing the same issue. It is strongly advised that.. you investigate alternative parking designs (i.e. shared parking, combining projects) with this applicant. Based on your proposal and existing site conditions, staff may recommend the preparation of a development agreement for provision of in -lieu parking fees for the balance of any deficient spaces, pending any redesign work done based on the overall direction provided in this letter. The Desert Club Tract #2 map provides a 50 foot ROW for Calle Cadiz. This street is developed as a 28 -foot paved roadway as measured from back of curb/gutter flow lines. Under the City General Plan, on -street parking is prohibited on streets of less than 32 feet in width. As a result, staff would not support any credit for on -street parking. 8. The parking requirements dictate that a minimum of 8 stalls be fitted with a trellis or similar. carport structure; the plans as proposed show 3 covered stalls. Compliance with all parking standards is required, unless specific written request is made, outlining all proposed variances requested in the design, and accompanied by the rationale behind the request. 9.. The building pop -out on the west elevation appears to be in conflict with Building and ' Fire Code requirements for separation and fire protection. This area should be redesigned based on consultation with Building and Safety, and County Fire. 10. The landscaping plan as provided shall be revised to include type of irrigation to be used in the landscape layout, and a wall location and detail plan of wall construction for all walls, such as trash enclosures, privacy, screening/separation, combination and retaining walls, etc. 11. The City may require ROW cut-outs and Village street light masts on Calle Cadiz. The applicant would be responsible for all costs associated with this requirement. A 6 -foot wide sidewalk adjacent to curb along the Calle Cadiz frontage will also be required. 12. The project as submitted still presents some concerns in relation to pedestrian connectivity within the Village context. • The property is walled off and secluded from other properties; there. is no way to move people between or through the site. • The alley to the rear should be looked at as an opportunity to accomplish more than just cycle vehicular traffic. Staff suggests redesigning the building to a configuration that would allow traffic to flow through, between Calle Cadiz (one-way access) and the alley (two-way). • The front parking should be deleted in favor of providing pedestrian access along Cadiz. There is a possibility that parallel on -street parking could be designed in conjunction with a pedestrian sidewalk along Cadiz, with the appropriate revised street improvements, similar to what was considered for the Main Street/Sun Vista project. All on-site parking needs to be to the rear of the property, and ADA parking will be required there. • Place the building closer to Calle Cadiz, to provide more direct access and association with the pedestrian. Provide street furniture, subtle water and landscape features, etc. to draw attention. to the overall project and facilitate a walking village atmosphere that will foster a pedestrian -oriented streetscape. Working with the westerly property owner on his proposal may present some design alternatives to address these concerns. .r 51 Please be aware that this letter is not all inclusive in terms of identifying. every detailed review item associated with this project. More detailed review will occur as part of the responsible agency comment process, to commence once all the outstanding items previously identified have been received. Should you have questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact the undersigned at 760-777-7069 (Fax 760-777-1233), or via e-mail at. wnesbit@la- quinta.org. Very truly yours, Wallace H. Nesbit Principal Planner c: Zuilding and Safety Department Public Works Department Planning Director Eric Ceja, Assistant Planner File; VUP 07-036