Loading...
PCRES 2004-018PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2004-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32117 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2004-499 APPLICANT: QUARRY RANCH L. L. C. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 91h day of March, 2004, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2004-499 for Tentative Tract 32117 herein referred to as the "Project" for Quarry Ranch L. L. C. ; and, WHEREAS, said Project has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970"(as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 2004-499) to evaluate the potential for adverse environmental impacts; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said Project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment unless mitigation measures are implemented, and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact could be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify recommending certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1 . The Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly, in that appropriate mitigation measures have been imposed which will minimize project impacts. 2. The proposed Project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. Considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Planning Commission Resolution 2004-018 Environmental Assessment 2004-499 Adopted March 9, 2004 4. The proposed Project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified . 5. The proposed Project will not have environmental effects directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. The adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) is attached hereto pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21081.6 in order to assure compliance during Project implementation. 7. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations §753.5(d). 8. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record, including EA 2004- 499 and the comments received thereon, that the project will have a significant impact upon the environment. 9. EA 2004-499 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. 10. The location and custodian of the record of proceedings relating to this project is the Community Development Department of the City of La Quinta, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend to the City Council certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-499 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 91h day of March, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: P:\FRED\TT 32117\PC RESO EA 2004-499.DOC Planning Commission Resolution 2004-018 Environmental Assessment 2004-499 Adopted March 9, 2004 AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None TOKIRK/ Ch1r roman Cityof La/Quinta, California ATTEST: G Z'-, CAR ORCI, Interim Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California P:\FRED\TT 32117\PC RESO EA 2004-499.DOC 2. 3. a Col Environmental Checklist Form Project title: Lead agency name and address: Contact person and phone number: Tentative Tract Map 32117 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Fred Baker 760-777-7125 Project location: North side of Quarry Ranch Road, west of Jefferson Street APN: 766-060- 001 Project sponsor's name and address: Quarry Ranch, LLC 1 Quarry Lane La Quinta, CA 92253 General plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: Low Density Residential 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The proposed Tentative Tract Map amends a previously reviewed, approved and recorded map (Tract 30651) which affected a larger area (75 acres) of the Quarry Ranch project. The area now under consideration totals 6.32 acres, located at the southern boundary of the Quarry project. The 6.32 acres currently being re -mapped was originally proposed to contain 8 residential lots. The proposed Tentative Tract Map would divide this same area into 13 single family residential lots. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Golf Course under construction South: Quarry Ranch Road, Low Density Residential lands West: Golf Course under construction East: Jefferson Street, Open Space lands 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: P1FREn\Quany Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -1- The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Systems Agriculture Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology / Water Quality Noise Recreation Air Quality Geology /Soils Land Use / Planning Population / Housing Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the X environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. February 27, 2004 PAFRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1s1499.doc -2- Signature Date P:AFREDAQuarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -3- EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or PAFREMQuany Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -4- individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact 1. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic X resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials)'. I. a)-d) The proposed project is not located on a General Plan Image Corridor. The property has been rough -graded and does not include any natural features. The ultimate construction of single family homes on the site will result in a slight increase in light generation, primarily from car headlights and landscape lighting. The City regulates lighting levels, and impacts will not be significant. Impacts to aesthetics overall are expected to be less than significant. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1s1499.doc -5- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would theproject: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) II. a)-c) The proposed project is not currently in agriculture, nor are there Williamson Act contracts on the subject property. Development of the site will not impact agricultural resources. PAFREMQuarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -6- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) III. a), b) & c) Air quality in the City is primarily affected by vehicle traffic. The proposed tract map could result in 13 single family homes, which could generate up to 124 trips per day'. Based on this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 6 miles, the following emissions can be expected to be generated from the project site. "Trip Generation, 6" Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, Single Family Detached category. P:TRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -7- Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout (Bounds Der dav) Ave. Trip Total Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Length (miles) miles/day 124 x 6 = 744 PM10 PM10 PM10 Pollutant ROC CO NOX Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear Grams at 50 66.96 1,740.96 357.12 7.44 7.44 Pounds at 50 mph 0.15 3.84 0.79 0.02 0.02 SCAQMD Threshold (lbs./day) 75 550 100 150 Assumes 124 ADT. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75`F, light duty autos, catalytic. As demonstrated above, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds. The proposed tract map will contribute only marginally more air pollution than the levels expected under the previous approval, since the increase in lots represents only a 62% increase in density. The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These measures will be integrated into conditions of approval for the proposed project. These include the following control measures. CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading conditions, this could result in the generation of 166.85 pounds per day, for a limited period while precise grading operations are active. The bulk of the grading has already occurred. The contractor will be required to submit a PM10 Management Plan prior to initiation of precise grading. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -8- Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Imported fill shall be adequately watered prior to transport, covered during transport, and watered prior to unloading on the project site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. Any area which remains undeveloped for a period of more than 30 days shall be stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix hydroseed on the affected portion of the site. 8. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction - related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour 11. The project proponent shall notify the City and SCAQMD of the start and end of grading activities in conformance and within the time frames established in the 2002 PM10 Management Plan. Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that impacts associated with PM10 are mitigated to a less than significant level. 11I. d) & e) The project will consist of single family homes and will not result in objectionable odors, nor will it expose residents to concentrations of pollutants. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -9- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantw/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, X either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002,) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on X any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002,) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002,) e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -to- f policy or ordinance? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002) f) Conflict with the provisions of an X adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ("General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," VHBC, Inc., June 2002,) IV. a)-f) A biological resource analysis was prepared for the proposed project as part of the review of Tentative Tract Map 3065 12 . The assessment found that although the project occurs in the potential habitat area for several species of concern, the habitat on the project site has been degraded by off -road vehicle use and illegal dumping, and these species are not expected to occur on the site. The proposed project site has been graded as part of the construction on Tract 30651 since the preparation of the biological resource report, and is not expected to be habitat for any species at this time. The site does not contain any wetlands or riparian habitat, nor is it a wildlife corridor. The site is not within the boundaries of the fee area of the Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. 2 "General Biological Assessment Quarry Ranch," prepared by VHBC, Inc., July 24, 2002. P:TRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklsl499.doc -It- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would theproject: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of a historical resource as defined in ' 15064.5? ("Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment..." Keith Co., June 2002) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ' 15064.5? ("Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment..." Keith Co., June 2002) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (General Plan Exhibit 6.8) d) Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ("Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment..." Keith Co., June 2002) V. a)-d) A Phase I cultural resources survey was completed for the proposed project as part of the review of Tentative Tract Map 3065 13 . The survey found no historic structure on the site, but did identify a historic trash dump. The survey also identified a prehistoric site, in the form of sherd scatter. The Phase I study made recommendations for mitigation measures which were confirmed by the Historic Preservation Commission, as follows: 1. An archaeologist shall be present on and off site during all grubbing and earth moving activities. The archaeologist shall be required to submit to the Community Development Department, for review and approval, a written report on all activities on the site prior to occupancy of the first building on the site. The Phase I study also identified the need for a Phase II study on the trash dump area, which was completed as part of the recordation process for the original map. This previous mitigation measure has therefore been satisfied. 3 "A Phase I Cultural Resources Inventory for the Quarry Ranch Development," prepared by the Keith Companies, June 12,2002. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -12- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to X potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, X as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X ("Geotechnical Investigation..." Sladden Engineering, July 2002) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? (General Plan Exhibit 8.2) iv) Landslides? (General Plan Exhibit 8.3) X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or X the loss of topsoil? (General Plan Exhibit 8.4) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property ("Geotechnical Investigation..." Sladden Engineering, July 2002) e) Have soils incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? ("Geotechnical Investigation..." Sladden Engineering, July 2002) P:TRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doe -13- VI. a)-e) A geotechnical analysis was completed for the project site as part of the review of Tentative Tract Map 3065 14 . The project site lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The site is not located within an Alquist Priolo Study Zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major earthquake. Structures on the site will be required to meet the City's and the State's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. These requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. The site is not located in a blowsand hazard area, and will therefore not be subject to significant soil erosion from wind. The site is subject to flooding erosion, however. The project proponent will be required to secure approval from the Coachella Valley Water District for all flood control plans on the site. These plans will be required to include control of soil erosion. Please also see hydrology discussion below. The geotechnical analysis found that the soils on the site are not expansive, and that they will support the development proposed by the project proponent. "Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Short Course Development The Quarry...," prepared by Sladden Engineering, July 31,2002. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -14- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Application materials) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Application materials) d) Be located on a site which is included X on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Riverside County Hazardous Materials Listing) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X physically interfere with an adopted P:TREMQuarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -15- emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VIl. a)-h) The construction of residential units on the proposed project site will not result in significant impacts associated with hazardous materials. The City implements the standards of the Household Hazardous Waste programs through its waste provider. These regulations and standards ensure that impacts to surrounding areas, or within the project itself, are less than significant. The site is not in an area subject to wildland fires. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -16- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI1I. HYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or X waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (Hydrology... and Drainage Concept Study, Tettemer and Assoc., July 2002) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Hydrology... and Drainage Concept Study, Tettemer and Assoc., July 2002) e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -17- (Hydrology... and Drainage Concept Study, Tettemer and Assoc., July 2002) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood X hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Hydrology... and Drainage Concept Study, Tettemer and Assoc., July 2002) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard X area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) — d)) The proposed project will be responsible for the drainage of on and off site flows tributary to the Bureau of Reclamation Dike No. 2. Siltation and debris were identified as issues in this area, due to its proximity to the Coral Reef Mountains. The proposed project will tie into the proposed improvements for Tentative Tract Map 30651, which include an earthen ditch with flood wall at the southwest corner of the adjacent tract, another along the southern boundary of the site, and a trapezoidal channel within the Jefferson Street right of way. CVWD required the preparation of a hydraulics, hydrology and drainage study for Tentative Tract Map 30651, to address flood control issues throughout the site. CVWD is still reviewing the re -submitted materials at this writing, but has indicated that the proposed improvements, with some modifications, will reduce the impacts associated with drainage and flood control on the site to less than significant levels. In order to assure that this is the case, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: The project proponent shall secure approval of all flood control improvements from the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any earth moving activity at the site. The Coachella Valley Water District provides domestic water to the subject property. The 13 homes will be required to implement the City's standards for water conserving plumbing fixtures and on -site retention, which both aid in reducing the potential impacts to groundwater. The proposed project will also meet the requirements of the City's water - conserving landscaping ordinance. These standards will reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. VIII. e)-g) The site is not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. P:TRED\Quart Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -18- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land use X plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a)-c) The proposed Tract Map conforms to the General Plan designation assigned to the site. The construction of the homes will comply with the City's Development Code. The development of housing on this property represents a continuation of the urbanizing pattern experienced in this area of the City. The site is not within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan fee area. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -19- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-2 Zone, and is therefore not considered to have potential for mineral resources. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -20- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation X of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation X of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III-144 ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan EIR p. III- 144 ff.) e) For a project located,within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) XI. a)-f) The project site is not located in an area of the City subject to high traffic noise levels. The location of single family homes on the site will not generate significant noise levels. The impacts associated with long term noise are not expected to be significant. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA ChkIs1499.doc -21- The construction of the project will generate noise from construction equipment and activities. Existing homes occur to the west of the site. Homes are considered sensitive receptors to noise, and the construction at the site could have a negative impact. In order to reduce these potential impacts, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: All internal combustion equipment operating within 500 feet of any occupied residential unit shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers and air intake silencers. 2. All stationary construction equipment (e.g. generators and compressors) shall be located as far away from existing homes as possible. Construction activities shall be limited to the hours prescribed in the La Quinta Municipal Code. The project site is not within the vicinity of an airport or airstrip. Impacts associated with noise on or near the project site are not expected to be significant. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1s1499.doc -22- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth X in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XII. a)-c) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the property, and is in an area designated for low and medium density residential land uses. The project will not induce growth or displace an existing community. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\PA Chk1st499.doc -23- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) X Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks X Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, X p. 46 ff.) XIII. a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees in place at the time of issuance of building permits. The project will be located within an existing country club, which will offset the need for other recreational facilities in the City. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1sl499.doc -24- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The construction of 13 residential units will not significantly impact the need for parks in the City. As previously stated, the project's location within an established country club will also lower the need for additional recreational facilities. P:\PRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -25- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan EIR p. I11-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Tentative Tract Map 31816) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Tentative Tract Map 31816) 0 Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Tentative Tract Map 31816) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, X or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. a)-g) The proposed project will generate up to 124 daily trips. The proposed project is consistent with the land use densities analysed in the General Plan and its EIR. Traffic levels in the area of the proposed project are expected to be at acceptable levels at P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1s't499.doe -26- buildout of the General Plan. The site does not include unsafe curves or other features. Impacts associated with the buildout of the project site are expected to be less than significant. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklat499.doc -27- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of X new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of X new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider—s existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project=s solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chk1st499.doc -28- XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The service providers for water, sewer, electricity and other utilities have facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site, and will collect connection and usage fees to balance for the cost of providing services. The construction of the proposed project is expected to have less than significant impacts on utility providers. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -29- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to X achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? b) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental X effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly'? XVII. a) The site has been rough graded. Prior to rough grading, the site was studied for biological resources, and found to be unsuitable due to high levels of disturbance. No impacts to biological resources are expected. The site has been reviewed for cultural resources. Mitigation measures are included in this document to lower impacts to a less than significant level. XVII. b) The proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklst499.doc -30- XVII. c) The construction of 13 residential within an existing country club will result in lower densities on this site, will not have considerable cumulative impacts and is consistent with the General Plan designation on the property. XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality and noise impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM10, and the site will generate PM10, which can cause negative health effects, Section I1I), above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality. Noise impacts associated with the construction activities on the site have been mitigated above to less than significant levels. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Environmental Assessments 2002-452 and 2002-454 were both used in preparing this report. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. P:\FRED\Quarry Ranch\EA Chklsl499.doc -3 1 -