Loading...
PCRES 2006-037PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2006-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA O:UINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2006-108 AND ZONE CHANGE 2006-130 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2005-576 CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24`" of October, 2006, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a General Plan Amendment and Pre-annexation Zoning designation of 12.29 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Hidden River Road, and more particularly described as: APNs 609-040-005, -007, & -023 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify recommending to the City Council certification of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed applications will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2006-576. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts associated with biological and cultural resources can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The site does not contain significant paleontological resources. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. No development is contemplated as a result of the amendments, and further environmental review will be undertaken when a development project is proposed. Planning Commission Resolution 2006-037 Environmental Assessment 2006-576 -Annexation 18 City of La Quinta October 24, 2006 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as the proposed project supports the long term goals of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing opportunities for City residents. No significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project, which occurs on a Major Arterial roadway. 6. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project does not have the potential to adversely affect human beings, as no development is proposed. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 8. The Planning Commission has considered Environmental Assessment 2006- 576 and said Environmental Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 9. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d1. 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby recommend to the City Council certification of Environmental Assessment 2006-576 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist, on file in the Community Development Department. Planning Commission Resolution 2006-037 Environmental Assessment 2006-576 -Annexation 18 City of La Quinta October 24, 2006 3. That Environmental Assessment 2006-576 reflects the independent judgment of the City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 24`h day of October, 2006, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Alderson, Barrows, Engle, and Chairman Quill NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Daniels ABSTAIN: None F'p,UL QUILL, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ~,~~ _ Douglas R. vans Community Development Director City of La Ouinta, California