Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
0211-108 (CSCS)
C v w� U - - o U ¢ ¢ ~ ¢ W W Z { a t 9N 1 Q o •— W J n_V ai a [^ A W ' p Nr cc LU P LL ¢ r% z ih +^n ' W o O ti ._ ari t• G C3 < tN CN G ZN ^'. Y7 f'r. Sti " L} 7• ' 'C `fkR rx f- '-» 0 Q 5 O Lam' _ NM. c• W�.-. - - In a I , L ✓' i. ° .- J _ CL 7 g 5I. s: • g - x© Q �w o r�Id r�.i cl a C co -Ir Z>�o a1 P G s =+ r ti0 ,- L\l LL 2 OZ W� Ir a !r]L] 1_ W n cr W __. ._ o - _ C: 4 :i 4. a. r _. :L a Q m 0 3 W (.i U O ¢ O W ¢ 0 0 u coa CO a) a _m °oi`� m T c� �o� �y W m a) maa) E-o a c cD °' o 0 0 .N W '" _`o ° N N .O ca '� O Y N L c0 c6 o U N 0 O UO J p Cl)CT O p y .= cn m o C d C Q U c° - C p 0 0 0 a0 . U ° O+ L oo o C O O m Q Z "00 W o 3a c/) a +' ma �� C N O a °U Q �� O Oo6 E N o L O ff) QO U0 °�cn O .LO- O°�. E m e -° cm U 3 •- -0 C 3 o .N E— ch p ai 5 :3 o Q Q1 0 Z N p O L 2 ~ O— J c0 a) O _ L° y C (6 w C p Q o OQ .a) ° E o OW C o - UO 30 oo > ' a o m U Um OC .-E iX CU ; a) VT . p a QC', J o o�°o'�o a 0 oo�.NcEw° r,) >�u°ac° vcaiccz —° w U W — Q U O 7 I. E E U U m N Z m C U �., a) o .0 Z o— a� T ° C O .N 3 a) cC y> o C U1 O O ° L o_ O L O '� c) O o p z a) N N x 0 (n _O - 3 H O i o o E E °' o '`-' 0 Q° c > }, � o N J Q7 C -.. W C L' E C E ° (a (� (O - a) N d a) .0 N C i--� EEO_ O O p U N T Q a a) O N O ? C o -p V7 U ° W .L.-� O-'+�-- U)-E O O C '- a) C '~ O E2 C E U O a O C 0 p 9 c-) U N L i cd N Q U) U J a) m r O N Q O a) Y a Q C cz O 3 O7 O - T N O L a° 4) of .0 a; C 0 3 E °' 0 Q Y +L• >, 7 ,T, O° Q 3 p_) U c6 .E a 3 '� U E O u! Q T U cV o W ro 3 E C o) -0 a W C Z m. Q .LO- C 3 a) N a) a) o a) O C� (�% U) ° m m o c a) O C -p Y '� co 0 0 a .ro '> o f 3 E° ca ° a) a) o O E O. o a a— o o m 0 7 E N o Z a c6 W° (/J O � o °- O C_ 2 o OC 0 W 1 O O E c6 3 of J- 5 O >. C i°¢ YC.° U o a) >' U a) °o 4) J O aIn C m O C cc C C- O a) O Y C C (SS Y E E o N .. ?L. o' 3 v 3 O E m L- a E, o ° 0 O C O _ Q Q 3 ° c N C) 0-0 O co w U c r: ,r E° c o o 00 i X c co m° .o (D a) o N Y o 0 Lo api ci �� xc �_ O O �, J U -� N L o .0 O U N o u07 uUi af� U N C -0 U = U c4 — a) Cn c6 E N >' L C � L E— C_ N— N O O U i — U— U C1 y0 0 C 7 C J CZ O J o a) _E o^ c a— a) �E U E L a °)FZ C) a_J 0U vO Up U 07 �EEcL33 L v 0U Qv(n QV ~ v n 3 U -0 O d m� �_ to c a l) C ° ° N E 7m. O 0 i C a) O > — O �_ 7 a L 0 W a as 0 U E a) C E L a) Q) C c6 L a= cd m— 0'' N 0),2 co U C U a c cz° o S 'O a co O N O m W ° a) �� o� E - U m� O o o aE�i E a)rn 0) O Q c° N 2 U U i cn E Q 9 N U V1 C-0 a) O O m cu 3 N or-ccoo.2E a�io O r-nc mom 0 u o_o>Q Q Y U N Q y 3 cn (I) a cCa m o a� ca > ID o O W 3 a Y6 cn a N cd m U �� V) '� ap O O SZ 9 0 m ° �C7 J y L 0 Q O .o 0 L a) a) 7 p 3 Y o co :s L T 3 n= c o L> m a 3� 3 3 w a�i o y m (U cNa cO n >,o C (� a) a c C n a y 7 E a) O- a) api E O o a) a) L a� a° N 7 0 C N, O cOi) C > 0 a O Q N N N a) U V N 7 .N ;_ E U 0 (Cf C "— L O (6 a) Z E Q c 'E _r Q C `o m coa o f 0L � -� W 0 O m L > L Q o O r a) in r a cif 0.i N 3 a U 0 0 O m m ML-LLL-09L £9Z26 ` INUOdl-IdO `` -LNIf10 v-i S1S3f•103d N01103dSNI OOIdNVi 3-nVO 96t,-8L Z60L-LZL-09L 13-L tl091 X09 'O'd �,N� �D, rr L��d� n� :S1N3WWOO (uuad) aogoN 4mn leuld Jannod;o asn 'dlua_L slo;oapop aglow saloe;daoa}; jouapc3 slaued qnS aolnJaS ulepy sainpaj BuulM 86e40n sol 6upM 46noa pnpuoo puna6japun alod Bawd 'dwa1 SIVA02IddV IVOIN10313 (SRO) aalioN 4mn leUld 1eu13 seoueliddy asal seO Buldid se;) uopelnsdeou3 uolpauuoO camas JanoO hd leua;el James Ja;seld 4slulj AN N-O sued JaMo4S ainsolou3;uawdlnb3 InO dol 6ulgwnld leulj 6ulgwnld buldld jaleM lewd la;eaH saull a;seM leulj ou;e13 SIHAOaddV ON18Wn�d sal sec) Bu1d1d seO leury ;sal 'Bgld punoiBiapun oulo813 punoibiepun uol;eool ;uawdlnb3 janoo o; lenoiddy wea8 puog ulejC] uleyr sbul;ooj puog ou;oa13 ;as laals STdAONddV IIVM)10018 SVdS - SIOOd leuli leulj 41e1 'lul -11EMAJ0 41e1101jaw:1 llwaJld IIeM 4ed sawl awsuapuoz) uol;elnsul IIeM AVed sloi;uoo g sue j p' aoeldam j slpAJ '1'd aoeldailj s;uaA uol;elnsul .wssaidwoo Bulwea j •n•v- j deiM o;'>I'O sue j ;sneV3 � oaa 1008 ild uol;sngwoo Pa1S jlb' wn;aa apejO gels s;ona soul;ooj 8 suuoj s;ona punoiBiepun Wes ;as S-IVAOZlddV -IVDINVH03W SIVAOaddV Maims aOlO3dSNl I 31VG I NOI.L"3dO E0103dSNl I 3.LVa I NOI L"AdO ❑N003H N01133dSNI r EMBASSY SUITES HOTELSo La Quinta, CA - �a..a 7�ova 'R-y& 7n the Village At Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive' December 11, 2003 City of La Quinta Building Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta CA 92253 To Whom It May Concern: Please consider this notice that we will be assuming the role of owner/builder on the Embassy Suites Hotel project. Permit Number 0211-108. --Thuk�rown ! Managing Partner Post Office Boa 1503 La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760-777-4077 Fax: 760-564-8200 Email: bisonhotelgrp(naol.com • 4 4 " P.O. BOX 1504 . Building D`777S,q„ 7-R Zac) pifiag8 ass CALLS TRMPiGO Address UINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Mailing Address 0 _ O -a City I Zip ITel. Contractor . 777- !'. I Zip Tel, 4a4tiq-�� State Lic. ` City & Classif. Lic. # ?] Arch., Engr. Designer {] IC L] r .• �, ..L e. i C Addrpss I Tel. r_ I_).-� Al uaih<4.. �,— r City Zip State �pq,rI � A 2— Lic. #C__ 14164 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7fX10) t.of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effec sIGr1ATu1iE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec 7031.5,6usiness and Professions Cade: Any city w county which reouims a parmif to construct, alter, Improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also cequwas the applcanI Inr such permit to No a signed Sffn*marlr that he is Ifcartsad pursuant to the piavislons of the• Contractor's 1_leensn Law, Chapter 9 (cwnmanefng Mfh Sec6an 7000) of iA visrpn 3 of the Business and Professions Cada, or that he is exempt rharolmm, and the basis tnr the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit sublocrs the applicant to a civil penally of nol more than five hundred dollars {$500). ' I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not Intended or offered for sale. {Sec. 7044, Belsn655 and ProfeLvans Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of properly who builds of impravas thereon and who does such work limuell or through his own employees, provided rhaf such improvements are nor fnrendad or ditered for sate. 11, however, the building Pr improvement Is sold within one year of comiefennn, the owner-buitder wrll (rave fire burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.) 1 I I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con- struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Pfelessians Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a confractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) I l I am exempt under Sec,-B. & P C for this reason Date Owner WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code ) Policy No. Company C7 Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less.) I certify that in the performance of thg work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, alley making Ihfs Carvtkale of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Componsallpa provisions of Ina Labor Coda, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this pa rmll shall be doomed to voked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this purmil is issued. I . 30g 7, Civil Code ) Lender's Name. to-1 L11c Lender's Adre dss �I-t.'.. IIt,-i.Cr- This is a building permit when properly filled oul, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 160 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that The above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and ounly dinancea and stale laws relating to building construction, and Ili_ vrl repres n lives Of this city to enter the abov mentioned proper) rinsbec n u Ose Signature of applicant. Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION ONLY hh ,\r V� BUILDING: TYPE-CONST. aFR OCC. GRP. A.P. Number C rc Legal Description rcej 7 .SCa • :Za Project Description H 5, DO��flj !.�_ } �; �I�Cl I r'. U 021 t_ I i c t_ . r, No. No. Dw. I��• Stories Units J V Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ S #ANA/0 Al itimaiea valuation PERMIT AMOUNT Plan Chk. Dep- Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading = Driveway Enc. } ;jl Infrastructure 1 OF LA TOTAL FIN REMARKS ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Validated by Validation: YELLOW = APPLICANT Date Permit PINK = FINANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Desert Sands Unified School District 47950 Dune Palms Road Date 9/23/03 La Quinta, CA 92253 No. 25008 (760) 771-8515 Owner Santa Rosa Plaza -Dan Brown Address P. O. Box 1503 City La Quinta Zip 92253 Tract # 29902 Type Commercial Lot # No. Street Unit 1 PAR6 50777 Santa Rosa Plaza Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Comments ��lFiFIJ,sC' q� �a 15 o BERMUDADUNE5 On RANCHO MIRAGE CJ 1NDIAN WELLS JPALM DESERT ws� LAQUINTA INDIQ 1r1 APN # 770020001 Jurisdiction La Quinta Permit # 0211-108 Study Area No. of Units 146 S.F. Lot # No. Street 152,689 Unit 6 Unit 7 Unit 8 Unit 9 Unit 10 S.F. At the present time, the Desert Sands Unified School District does not collect fees on garageslcarports, covered patioslwaikways, residential additions under 500 square feet, detached accessary structures (spaces that do not contain facilities for living, sleeping, cooking, eating or sanitation) or replacement mobile homes. It has been determined that the above -named owner is exempt from paying school fees at this time due to the following reason: EXEMPTION NOT APPLICABLE This certifies that school facility fees imposed pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code 65996 Et Seq. in the amount of $0.34 X 152,689 S.F. or $51,914.26 have been paid for the property listed above and that building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for this square footage in this proposed project may now be issued. Fees Paid By O/C Washington Mutual Bank - Shanon Dennis Check No. 594495975 Name on the check Telephone 777- Commercial By Dr. Doris Wilson Superintendent Fee collected /exempted by Patricia arbuzza Payment Recd $51,914.26 Over/Under r, �T Signature NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), this will serve to notify you that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest the fees or other payment identified above will begin to run from the date on which the building or installation permit for this pro;ect is issued, or from the date an which those amounts are paid to the District(s) or to another public entity authorized to collect them on the District('s) behalf , whichever is earlier. NOTICE: This Document NOT VALID if Duplicated Embossed Original - Building Department/Applicant Copy - Applicant/Receipt Copy - Accounting T4ht 4 4a" P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager From: Oscar Orci, Planning Manager BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT (760) 777-7012 FAX (760) 777-7011 To CDD: 7-31-2003 Due date: 8-12-2003 Status: 3an Review Building Plans Approval (This is an approval to issue a Building Permit) The Community Development Department has reviewed the Building Plans for the following project: Description: EMBASSY SUITES Address or general location: 50-777 Santa Rosa Parkway Applicant Contact: Danny Brown 777-4077 The Community Development Department finds that: ❑ ...these Building Plans do not require Community Development Department approval. ❑ ...these Building Plans are approved by the Community Development Department. ❑ ...these Building Plans require corrections. Please forward a copy of the attached corrections to the applicant. When the corrections are made please return them to the Community Development Department for review. t)scq Orci, arming Manager Date Plan Check # 14192 RIVERS,1 E COUNTY.,COMM.UNITY HEALTH AGENCY ;it'3:EP�F�°i�VlEt�l"�" Old' V1kQN�Vl7EN'1"AL_ HEALTH, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT PLAN APPROVAL NOTICE Date 5/19/9 Project Name, Embassy Suites Address 50-777 Santa Rosa Plaza, La Quinta Plans Submitted by Gary Houston Phone 310-505-1049 Owner Hostmark Address 111 Plaza Drive Suite 200, Scharryburg Phone 847-511-9090 Hospitality group 111, 60173 The plans are now approved subject to the conditions listed below, and the attached compliance sheet. 1) Interior of cabinets must be light. in color. 2). Lights must be shatter proof. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS: Contact the Plan. Ch.66ker for a Preliminary Inspection when construction is approximately 80% eoFrlplete, with plumbing, rough venti.latlon; and rough equipment installed. Request for inspection should. be made at least five (5) working days in advance. A FINAL INSPECTION MUST be made upon completion°of ALL work including finished:details. APPROVAL to operate shall not be granted, or remodeled areas approve tooperate, until,the facility has passed<theFINAL INSPECTION, and "APPLICATION TO'OPERATE" has been completed and.PERMIT.'FEES have been paid. Request for inspection should be made at_least five,:(5)`working days in advance. PLANS CHECKED BY Tracey Ford REHS Phone 760-863-8287 I acknowledge the corrections noted herein and as indicated on the plans and agree to incorporate them during construction: 1' Signature. Company Name DEH -SAN -178 (Rev 2/06) Date Corona Indio Murrieta - o Dr 47-950 Arabia St "A" 38740 $k`Can . �Y,� r.Y� P (760)863-8287 (951).461 0284 Fax (760) 863-8303 Fax (951) 461:;0245 Hemet 2275 S. Main St Suite 204 800 S. Sanderson (951) 273-9140 (951) 766-2824 Fax (951) 520-8319 Fax (951) 766-7874 Palm Springs Riverside 2500 N. Palm Canyon Dr 4065 County Cir (760) 320-1048 (951) 358-5172 Fax (760) 320-1470 Fax (951) 358-5017 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY OIARTMEN'P Off' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.. Its] M The plans for your food establishment have been reviewed and rejected for the following reasons: Incomplete/missing finish schedule See attached Incomplete/missing equipment schedule::. See attached. Incomplete/missing plumbing layout See :attached Incomplete/missing mechanical or exhaust schedule/layout See attached Incomplete/missing back-up dry food storage shelving See attached x Other: See attached Please retrieve your plans and submit corrected copies.for.approval to the Environmental Health office located in Indio. Rejected plans will be discarded. if not picked up within sixty: (60) days of this notice date. If plans are not resubmitted within 5 working days of rejection your plans. shall be placed at the bottom of the list of facilities to be plan checked. IMPORTANT NOTE: No inspection of your establishment will be conducted, or approval granted to operate, until all proper information. requested has .been received and. your approved plans have been returned to you. Plans must be reviewed, approved, stamped, and returned to you by this. department prior oto any construction work beginning. Upon completion of plan review, two sets of stamped, approved plans are to be taken to the building department for their review and approval. PLANS CHECKED BY Tracey Ford,:REHS'lll Phone . (760) 863-8287 I acknowledge receipt of the above mentioned plans and understand that 3 sets of revised plans must be submitted for further review. Signature........Date Company Name DEH -SAN -030 (Rev 2/06) Corona Hemet- Indio Murrieta Palm Springs Riverside 2275 S. Main St Suite 204 800 S. Sanderson 47-950 Arabia St "A" 38740 Sky Canyon Dr 2500 N. Palm Canyon Dr 4065 County Cir (951) 273-9140 (951) 766-2824 (760) 863-8287 (951) 461-0284 (760) 320-1048 (951) 358-5172 Fax (951) 520-8319 Fax (951) 766-7874' Fax (760) 863-8303 Fax (951) 461-0245 Fax (760) 320-1470 Fax (951) 358-5017 Department Web Site — www.rivdoeb.org 'Riverside County Fire Department....,', Fire Protection .Planning Section To: Ld .: +Y�tthTd _ ►SI��Ia! irl�Q. '��.» I� fY Fax: . Tract/Parcel Map #: Perm it/Lot #: G IM e cGSS.\/ Job Site Address: 5`� �77 )j)AL r:lel 0, Final, Fo'rRecordation Release For Building Permit(s) L Shell Final Only (No Tenant) 1 e Final For Occupancy Building Plan Check Fees Paid Building Plan Check Fees Not Paid Other Fees Fees Not Required If you should have any questions, please contact'the appropriate Riverside County Fire Protection Planning office for further assistance. Auth ' 'ng Signature For Release Print Name Farts C — Revised 4/17/2009 COUNTY`OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTHAGENCY ,. DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH- SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN. FORM # " " DATE o V SUBJECT PERMIT NO. ADDRESS INSPECTOR REMARKS: • q Cri ,.. Dittnhutinn:;WHITE''-0ffice: CANARY -0wnee:-RINK- Office ....: COUNTY OF.,RIVERSIDE-COMMUNITY:.HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT F'HEALTH ENVII�oN ¢ NTA HEALTHSERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN.. FORM DATE SUBJECT F--,k� + �c s,. fes H iAe 1 PERMIT NO. e r ADDRESS ��� —7 R&S INSPECTOR -� c t1 REMARKS:t'Qs+t.c#aPC ; iso t%ia.G� tAyt A ��`ih� ,•tet' ,,.t ('P.'Alf f1 DEH -SAN -1 18 (Rev 8/021 _ Distribution: WHITE;= -Office; CANARY—Owner, PINK—Office . :. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN. FORM # DATE SUBJECT kAA PERMIT NO. ADDRESS etc, REMARKS: INSPECTOR Pt k L� V C u.., SCP r^AeA S 11 k 1P f I � pe 3LO -lupi Ji- DEH -SAN -118 EH 18 (Rev 8/02) I V, Distribution: WHITE -Office; CANARY—Owner; PINK=Office, �`, � ���� r• . "'rte Vis. T# �, r..+t'�¢����<} a },', �.�, .. - *� ,,'���c F x 7.}�S � .M:t J,, }r xt' �� DEH SAN 118 (Rev 8/02) y � _ �. Distnbutlon WHITE r Olfice CANARY—Owner PINK—Offi� �}� �fC rx �.'f+1,r o ".'�i ..c "' .r,+�:�r xC. Y.} 'Srk�,` '�. Y �. i�fi v �.=v a )��c�l ..f� -•,Z Yr�.FSµ �e IR' F:t+r � ti +r.'S frk' A. r,�.:r-� )A ,4. r .c'i. c�Ri�i.ltf'+!�'�'�,;elesa.rxi..,;5,.�,af;:�s��'=L•u�:�t�:�.at`c�'�,'"�%:.'r�..f'�na3`r...�+.��ea'�:r;'!'fxu�.t�ia.e�.0 g�a,"�rca���f+,w:!�i'�+�1bR'�. �r;��Er:;''xt�.fc%.X,�S�.�.? s..�.eiSL,'�-T.n"�`�,�.^�<r� Alfitt4kr,rr��C 'a.^�3r�:"._.. �k:�td.4P_;�i,: ,- COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN. FORM # DATE -' SUBJECT L"64i` a. PERMIT NO. �^ ADDRESS��1 5G✓��r �L:Sr, �I^,2c, / l�q �X..,.�I �-i �. INSPECTOR ;•� REMARKS:C'✓•< ti t D it i+V f <ft t� � � �1? 9 r't1r^0 � 1 V r, � � 1.+..C' e r�* -t'�.e. Q "f �,.j % � 1 L ✓i,s 1 //•• fir. p 1 rcL JIF i e+ 2, VI,rG�liief! 16t' 1 04, 9 4 i i tri 6 er 1� ✓� , Y G e eJ I,: IID JAj &7t �� DEH SAN 118 (Rev 8/02) y � _ �. Distnbutlon WHITE r Olfice CANARY—Owner PINK—Offi� �}� �fC rx �.'f+1,r o ".'�i ..c "' .r,+�:�r xC. Y.} 'Srk�,` '�. Y �. i�fi v �.=v a )��c�l ..f� -•,Z Yr�.FSµ �e IR' F:t+r � ti +r.'S frk' A. r,�.:r-� )A ,4. r .c'i. c�Ri�i.ltf'+!�'�'�,;elesa.rxi..,;5,.�,af;:�s��'=L•u�:�t�:�.at`c�'�,'"�%:.'r�..f'�na3`r...�+.��ea'�:r;'!'fxu�.t�ia.e�.0 g�a,"�rca���f+,w:!�i'�+�1bR'�. �r;��Er:;''xt�.fc%.X,�S�.�.? s..�.eiSL,'�-T.n"�`�,�.^�<r� Alfitt4kr,rr��C 'a.^�3r�:"._.. �k:�td.4P_;�i,: ,- �L[lCI:'Mr[.1 IVICIV`I; Vr"-`CIV V If[lJIV1VI CIV HL'�Il C1\L1^I 1~� - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH -SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN. FORM #J, DATE h 14 SUBJECT -,AAb w 55-1 sl-ktr � P PERMIT NO. C ADDRESS% ;•, i� .."Z 1'�; t •� a� REMARKS: INSPECTOR u IL Le V 0-'_4 z;jf i/�A ?� I, R! ^C., ,�c� n ,qtr' LiJ� c � � ca. �,s7t'',>• ��'� .. . � 'tj. r" at t�t'q,fY' L. 't�'t v v"� - a �c. ''.v. P"�cc_-r��w9 i �+�J • � � � {•.i �"� �' j 1 r DeH-SAN-lia (Rev 8M2 Distribution: WHITE=Office; CANARY—Owner; PINK—Office 4 I--. / dO" COUNTY.OF RN RSIDE COMMWIT -' .H TH'AGENCY' cl Earth Systems ww Southwest DAILY REPORT OF INSPE OF 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760) 345-1588 • (800) 924-7015 SB/R.S CO. GOV. ( UBCj TITLE 21/24 OTHER Building Permit No.: DSA Application No.: Date of Inspection: Project Name: IP tRi S& Q,,w S @2,Ao Cg&A ;R.*Z-A -Job No.: Project Address: S- 'rM SAGO. L&N� z4 C�+L ►ts�+� • C Architect: &CO • Structural Engineer: General Contractor: Sub Contractor: t_ 9ES TYPE OF INSPECTION: Fiel Shop Welding Bolting Other Description of Work Inspected: 3 "' z Unresolved Items: Welding Operators & Certification Numbers: Type of Electrodes: 0 g_aLI k I hereby certify that I have inspected all of the above reported work, unless otherwise noted, and to the best of my ability I have found this work to comply with the approved plans, specifications & applicable building laws. Final report issued at project completion. Inspector's Name/NoInspector's Signature 4Z All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours; over 4 hours will be an B hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past 12 pm will be an 8 hour minimum. Contractor's Representative BD-M-400 (10/98) Copy 1 ESC Lab Copy 2 Project Superintendent Copy 3 Governing Agency 4% Earth Systems �, Southwest DAILY REPORT OF INSPE OF STRUCTI 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760) 345-1588 • (800) 924-7015 SB/R.S CO. GOV. ( UBC -) TITLE 21/24 OTHER Building Permit No.: DSA Application No.: Date of Inspection: 01+ Project Name: �kxASS'A S*OTA +P&34 zA Job No.: 017 3— 61 Project Address: 5-0-1-1-1 SA-,j-rA "&A k-Z A Q Architect:- Structural Engineer: �L OWES General Contractor: Sub Contractor: TYPE OF INSPECTION: Field/Shop I Welding Description of Work Inspected: 4* V !t L- i A-c T' 1 Unresolved Items: Welding Operators & Certification Numbers: Type of Electrodes: Other *tea :,uticL� CL I hereby certify that I have inspected all of the above reported work, unless otherwise noted, and to the best of my ability I have t nd this work to comply with the approved pians, specifications 8 applicable building laws. F[nal rep0ri issued at project compleli0n. Inspector's NamelNo. S Inspector's Signature All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours; over 4 hours will be an 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past 12 pm will be an 8 hour minimum. Contractor's Representative BD-M-400 (10/98) Copy 1 ESC Lab Copy 2 Project Superintendent Copy 3 Governing Agency Earth Systems •�,� Southwest DAILY REPORT OF INSP OF 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760) 345-1588 • (600) 924-7015 SB/R.S CO. GOV. ( UBC ', TITLE 21/24 OTHER Building Permit No.: DSA Application No.: Date of Inspection: Project Name: SA--" RO-SA i�A Job No.: 0077X70 7 Project Address: LA-QLAM-rA — Architect: V- _ Structural Engineer:. Y)B-- OLQ.tJ General Contractor: <se Sub Contractor: TYPE OF INSPECTION: Field/Shop Welding Bolting 't `, Other �>�OY Description of Work Inspected: Q K a 3 1 v - '0 A m A Unresolved Items: Welding Operators & Certification Numbers: Type of Electrodes: I hereby certify that I have inspected all of the above reported work, unless otherwise noted, and to the best of my ability I have fau this work to comply with the approved plans, specifications & applicable building laws. Final report issued at project completion. Inspector's Name/No. ��' Inspector's Signature All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours; over 4 hours will be an 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past 12 pm will be an 8 hour minimum. Contractor's Representative BD-M-400 (10/98) Copy 1 ESC Lab Copy 2 Project Superintendent Copy 3 Governing Agency aEarth systems Southwest Building Permit No.: AILY REPORT OF INSI OF STRUCTURAL 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760) 345-1588 • (800) 924-7015 SB/R.S CO. GOV. ( UBC ", TITLE 21/24 OTHER DSA Application No.: Date of Inspection: 77" 114 —0 `t Project Name: SE �A Job No.: 01-183--0`( Project Address: ZC�0-71-1SslaiN L2 SA -i--A LA 4LA - Architect: Structural Engineer: — olxlErJ General Contractor: Sub Contractor: TYPE OF INSPECTION: (Ele:1d>/hop Welding Bolting Other Description of Work Inspected: C--r � A, 1 R-)/I-o -\,�-T-. l -)"'-'--o 3Lz3]ut- to A a Unresolved Items: Welding Operators & Certification Numbers: _ Type of Electrodes: `—I bi 8 I hereby certify that I have inspected all of the above reported work, unless otherwise noted, and to the best of my ability I have and this work to comply with the approved plans, specifications & applicable building laws. Final report issued at project completion. Inspector's Name/No. Inspector's Signature l 6t0 4 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours; over 4 hours will be an 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past 12 pm will be an 8 hour minimum. Contractor's Representative BD-M-400 (10/98) Copy 1 ESC Lab Copy 2 Project Superintendent Copy 3 Governing Agency DEC 03 2003 3:59PM HP LRSERJET 3200 P.1 LARGO Concrete Inc. 2741 Walnut Ave. #I10 Ph: (714) 731-3600 License #59Z909 Tustin, CA 92790 Fax: (714) 731-4800 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Largo Ul #: 040 Date: December 3, 2003 Sob-.dule Impact: No Cost Impact: No Pro- ected Cast: To: BFL OWEN Fax Number; (949) 860-4810 Attention: Jennifer Jurgen Project Name: Embassy Suites Job #: L504 Plan Reference: Bar Substitution of #11 in lieu of #10 as necessary whitin this project Subject: Foundation Response Needed By: A.S.A.P. Per a phone conversation between Mr. Dayle of BFL Owen and Mr. Dave Gard of JL Davidson, please confirm that is acceptable to substitute the #10 bars, due 1:o shortages from the mills, with #11. Please be advised that the City Inspector is requesting that this FYI be stamped. Thank you, Florin Ungureanu f�"1 f� ' i .S 117 CC: Danny Brown -Bison Hotel Group, Jeff Pawlowski-PK Architects E , j1� [1 WVr, Response: Yes, it is acceptable to substitute #11 bars for # 10 bars is the grai le beam schedule (131S511) and the footing schedule (118511). See revised schedules (attached). DEC 03 2003 3:59PM HP LRSERJET 3200 p.2 Project: Embassy Suites La Quinta----- - Job #: 4012149.1 Engineer: JDJ Date: 12/3/2003 RM#40 Location Old Bar Size New Bar Size # Bars Bar Size Area/Bar Total Area # Bars Bar Size Area/Bar Total Area in2 in In in GB-1 12 # 10 1.27 15.24 10 # 11 1.56 15.6 GBA 24 # 10 1.27 30.48 20 # 11 1.66 31.2 Location Old Bar Size New Bar Size Bar Size Spacing Area Bar 8,MG Spacing Area CW-21 #10 1 @61noc2.54in/ft #11 Q7inoc 2.67 *** Lap lengths must be adjusted based on riew bar size ry.� DEC 03 2003 3:59PM HP LRSERJET 3200 P.3 R,r--/ #elo GRADE BEAM SCHEDULE MARK WIDTH THICKNESS TOP REINF'G BOTTOM REIN G TIES REMARK GB-1 6-0" 5'-0" �� #4 ® 10" GB-2 6'-0" 4'-0" 14—#9 8—#9 #4 ® 12" J7/S512 G8-3 26-0" 2'-0' 3--#8 3—#8 #3 TIES ® 10" s � �• . • �Iti .� 117 SCALE GRADE BEAM SCHED. 1 "-- 13 2149-191E LiPro WWAOIW01 149,1 Embassy Supea Ln CWnblDmfGngl6VuGWl4& 511,dwg, 03= l A4s1B PY1, Jurgen DEC 03 2003 3:59PM HP LRSERJET 3200 p.4 r,7�' I-OqP 5 PM, jurgens P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (760) 777-7000 FAX (760) 777-7101 I hereby acknowledge that any approvals given by the City to place concrete for the foundation and slab system for the Embassy Suites Hotel (50-777 Santa Rosa Plaza) does not infer that the smoke control system, as required by Section 905 of the California Building Code, has been approved by the Fire Department or the City. I also acknowledge that it may be necessary to alter structural aspects of the building (including concrete that has already been placed) in order to comply with the smoke control system that is ultimately approved. I hereby agree to accept the risk of continuing with the placement of concrete at the abovementioned site and further agree to hold the City harmless for any damages that may occur as a result of the decision to continue construction on the building without an approved smoke control system. C Developer Title �1 Date g��9 SUMMIT BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY December 11, 2003 MEMORANDUM Director for Department of Building and Safety Director for Department of Planning and Public Works City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-1504 Re; Embassy Suites Hotel La Quinta, CA Dear Directors, This communication is intended to advise you that Summit Builders is not affiliated with Bison Hotel Group/Santa Rosa Plaza on the new Embassy Suites Hotel Project and is not to be considered as the Contractor of Record for the development of the Hotel. In no instance or circumstance will Summit Builders be held responsible nor accountable for actions on the part of others as it may relate to the Hotel development. Please consider this as formal notification of our non -responsibility. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our corporate offices. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely,. Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc. d.b.a. Summit Builders 4700 Von Karman Avenue • Suite 100 • Newport Beach, California 92660 • Phone: 949/450-9911 • FAX: 949/450-9922 California Licensc No. 584656 T44f 4 4 a" P.O. Box 1504 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92247-1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT Embassy Suites Smoke Control System Report of Observation, August 15, 2006 (760) 777-7012 FAX (760) 777-7011 Embassy Suites construction personnel conducted a demonstration of the Smoke Control System for observation by the Building & Safety Department and Riverside County Fire Department on August 15, 2006, commencing at approximately 10:00 a.m. Because no CBC Section 905 documentation was presented, this observation was treated as a demonstration of sequence and function. Demonstration Michael J. Madden, P.E., of Hughes Associates, Inc., began with an overview of the system with the group gathered around the approved fire sprinkler plans and approved smoke control amendments to the building plans. Mr. Madden pointed out the major components of the system and discussed the expected sequence of events upon initiation of the system. Some discussion ensued regarding the smoke barrier separating the atrium smoke zone from the remainder of the building. Next, the system was activated numerous times by magnetically triggering an atrium area smoke detector. For each triggering in turn, the following observations were made: • Ground floor observation - Air conditioning systems halted, ground level make-up air doors and windows opened, roof exhaust fans were heard to operate. System reset.. • Roof observation — Air conditioning systems halted, roof exhaust fans operated with significant airflow noted from each. System reset. With one alarm system employee on the roof and another monitoring the control panel on the ground floor, a disconnect for one of the roof exhaust fans was turned off. Within about a minute, the control panel reported fault at the fan location. • Fourth floor observation — Make-up air louvers opened, corridor doors to the guest units closed on magnetic release, roof exhaust fans were heard to operate. System reset. A notebook was held in front of one of the beam detector reflectors at the fourth floor walking level. Within about a minute, the control panel reported a fault at the detector location. After the fault cleared calibration card, causing approximately 30% obscuration, was held in front of a beam detector. This triggered the smoke control system, resulting in the same operational observations. Page 1 of 4 Third floor observation — Make-up air louvers opened, corridor doors to the guest units closed on magnetic release, roof exhaust fans were heard to operate. System reset. Second floor observation — Make-up air louvers opened, corridor doors to the guest units closed on magnetic release, roof exhaust fans were heard to operate. System reset. Ground floor observation — An additional demonstration was conducted as follows. With the building under normal power, a smoke alarm was activated as above. While the smoke control system was operating, the building power was removed by opening the main circuit breaker at the electrical service. Emergency power activated as expected. After verifying system operation as above, with one team of observers on the roof and another team in the lobby, normal power was restored to the building. Again, system operation was as above. However, the roof observation team stopped to check the supplemental make-up air units (RTU-25A and RTU-25B). Neither unit was in operation as intended. Also, upon system reset (all building conditions normal), the units still failed to re -start. Activation of the pull station at the lobby check -in desk correctly initiated a general alarm without activating the smoke control system. Concerns • There are two HVAC units on the first floor roof (RTU-25A and RTU-25B, accessible from the second floor) that provide normal cooling, when needed, to the atrium area. Upon activation of the smoke control system, these two units provide additional make-up air to the atrium in order to keep make-up air velocity below the maximum allowable 200 feet per minute (fpm). On the day of the demonstration, the weather was warm enough that the units were running. With the personnel on scene, it was not possible to turn normal cooling off in order to demonstrate that they would start automatically upon initiation of the smoke control system. • One of the two systems above (west side, above the spa area) has a supply duct that penetrates the one -hour fire -rated occupancy separation at the northwest corner of the atrium, providing conditioned air to the corridor adjacent to the library. Neither the plan nor a visual inspection revealed the existence of a smoke and fire damper at the penetration as required by CBC Sections 713.10 and 713.11. Because this location is also the smoke barrier, the required damper must be controlled automatically by the required controls for the smoke control system. • At the northeast and southwest corners of the second, third and fourth floors, where the motorized make-up air louvers are installed, louvered doors are also installed (items 2B, 9B, 8B, 11 B, 10B, and 12B on the Make -Up Air Plans in the approved Smoke Control Plan Design Report). The perceived airflow was significantly reduced when the louvered doors were closed. Written verification should be provided, demonstrating that the net free area of the door louvers provides not less than the 9 square feet per door as specified in the Design Report. Page 2 of 4 Several times during the demonstrations, the control panel indicated a fault condition at the south make-up air doors. This appeared to be caused by the doors and/or windows failing to open fully. This is a matter of great concern for two reasons. First, being new, this system's physical condition is the best that it ever will be. Consequently, it should operate perfectly and repeatedly. Second, because it is anticipated that this system will rarely, if ever, be operated, the aging process and unpredictable maintenance practices dictate that, when actually needed, the system cannot be expected to operate better than in this initial demonstration. The current condition is deemed unpredictable, at best. The casement windows noted above open outward over a walkway. In the event of system activation, their movement and final position would present a hazard to a person in the area. In addition, contact with a person can prevent full opening. It was observed that, when fully open, the windows can be accidentally or intentionally pushed closed. The windows do not recover from such action, compromising the make-up air volume. At the lobby Display Kitchen, the intended smoke barrier is designated at the tiled wall separating the front cooking line from the back cooking line. This wall contains at least two, lightweight, metal, bi-directional swinging doors. CBC Section 905.2.3 requires that the smoke barrier be sealed to limit leakage at these types on unprotected openings. Visually, the openings around these doors are sizeable. Prior to acceptance of this condition, detailed calculations must be provided in accordance with this Code section to justify the existing doors or prescribe the appropriate replacements. During all demonstrations, at a point roughly twenty feet inside of the lobby casement windows supplying make-up air, the perceived airflow appeared to exceed the 200 fpm maximum allowable velocity. Prior to acceptance of this condition, measurements must be taken to verify the actual velocity at this location. The firefighter's control panel does not provide operational control over individual pieces of smoke control equipment, as required by CBC Section 905.13.2, Item 1. For example, there is no switch on the control panel which individually operates RTU-25A and RTU-2513. It is understood that a new control panel faceplate is being prepared that will include control and status indication of these units. However, because they are also thermostatically controlled when in normal building operation, care must be taken to provide for their individual control at the panel. Other components, such as sliding make-up air doors, commonly equipped with an on -off switch at the door, must be evaluated to assure that the requirement of this Code section is met. In addition, the yet uninstalled damper at the occupancy separation between the atrium and the library corridor would require this level of individual control. Page 3 of 4 Outstanding Reports California Building Code, Section 905.15 and 905.16 specify the detailed testing and reporting documentation required prior to system acceptance by the Building Official and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is the responsibility of the applicant to be completely familiar with those requirements and submit all documentation in a timely and organized manner to facilitate prompt review and approval by the Building & Safety Department. This report is intended to document only those items actually observed during the demonstration on August 15, 2006. Equipment and operations not demonstrated, for whatever reason, are not a part of this report. Therefore, the corrective recommendations herein should not be considered comprehensive. After submittal of all Code -required documentation and its subsequent review, additional corrective action may be required. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of August, 2006, Greg Butler Building & Safety Manager Page 4 of 4 Steve Traxel From: Greg Butler "rent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:05 AM To: Michael Madden (mmadden@haifire.com); Dennis Atwood (srp-construction@hotmail.com); Tom Hartung; Michael O'Connor; Steve Traxel; Tom Genovese Subject: Embassy Suites Status Conversations Contacts: Dennis Atwood Dennis, The purpose of this e-mail is simply to memorialize two telephone conversations that we had this week regarding completion of the La Quinta Embassy Suites Hotel. If you notice any errors in the information below, PLEASE "reply all" with any necessary corrections. Tuesday, August 29, 2006: • When we spoke on Tuesday, you told me that you were waiting for updated drawings from your consultants in order to resubmit in response to the Building & Safety Department correction list dated July 24, 2006. The resubmittal, review and approval of those drawings is required prior to final inspections, as previously communicated on February 25, 2005 and again on May 24, 2006. You anticipated that you would be submitting revised' puns to us this week. • You told me that one of my concerns (the second concern on page 2 of my "Report of Observation, August 15, 2006") had been resolved by eliminating the section of ductwork that penetrated the occupancy separation at the northwest corner of the atrium ground floor. • You asked me if I had had an opportunity to "do the math" on the bi-directional metal doors separating the front cooking line from the back cooking line (the third concern on page 3 of the above -mentioned report) to see if they qualified as part of the smoke barrier. I told you that it was never my intention to perform those calculations; rather, I expected your consultant to perform the work so that I could check it. • You indicated that you were waiting for a replacement faceplate for the smoke control system control panel (in response to my fifth concern on page 3 of the abovementioned report). • Also in that conversation, you mentioned that there was a meeting proposed to be held on or about September 14, 2006 at the hotel that included a La Quinta City Councilmember and a Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) committee. You asked me if that meeting would be allowed if final approval of the smoke control system had not been obtained. I informed you that my position was that it would NOT be allowed, subject to the Director of Building & Safety giving me alternate direction. Thursday, August 31, 2006: • This morning I called you to clarify some details of the CVAG meeting. You indicated that the event included meetings in the ballroom and overnight stays, either utilizing existing casitas or guestrooms in the hotel proper. If the intent is to use rooms within the hotel itself, the smoke control system will need to be 100% complete and approved. • We also touched bases on the drawings and other documentation for which you are waiting. You told me that the base drawings were given to the mechanical designer yesterday for his use in preparing updated mechanical sheets for inclusion in your submittal to me. You also told me that you still expected to resubmit to me this week. asked about the kitchen door calculations and you assured me that Mike Madden was handling those. I mentioned that, since I hadn't heard from him, I was assuming that he had no questions for me. Please be aware that the Building & Safety Department remains committed to doing its part in assuring the timely completion of this project. I look forward to receiving your updated documents. Yours truly, Greg Butler Building & Safety Manager City of La Quinta Message Page 1 of 2 Steve Traxel From: Greg Butler Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:35 PM To: Steve Traxel Subject: FW: Santa Rosa Plaza Here's the e-mail that sent yesterday evening GB -----Original Message ----- From: Greg Butler Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 5:13 PM To: 'Yost, Jon' Cc: Dennis Atwood (srp-construction@hotmail.com); Sonia Cooley (sonia.cooley@fire.ca.gov); Tom Hartung; Michael O'Connor Subject: RE: Santa Rosa Plaza Dear Mr. Yost: Here are the items necessary to obtain a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Embassy Suites Hotel: 1. Riverside County Fire Department approval (I spoke to Sonia this afternoon. She confirmed that the job card is signed and provided me with the list of conditional fixes. These fixes need to be demonstrated to me.) 2. Riverside County Environmental Health Department approval (This is entirely outside of my control. Dennis Atwood may know best where you are on this.) 3. La Quinta Public Works Department approval (I sent them an e-mail at 4:45 p.m. today, asking specifically for their concurrence. You should follow-up with them, in case they have any issues for you to address.) 4. La Quinta Community Development Department approval (I sent them an e-mail at 4:45 p.m. today, asking specifically for their concurrence. You should follow-up with them, in case they have any issues for you to address.) 5. La Quinta Building & Safety Department approval (You need to schedule a final inspection for the Ballrooms and Kitchen through our normal channels (by telephone at 760-777-7153); inspections requested prior to 6:00 a.m. are performed same day; after 6:00 are performed the next work day). With completion of the above items, I will issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, strictly limited to the areas outlined below in your request. Yours truly, Greg Butler Building & Safety Manager City of La Quinta -----Original Message ----- From: Yost, Jon [mailto:Jon.Yost@fnf.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:34 AM To: Greg Butler Subject: Santa Rosa Plaza I would first like to thank you for taking time to talk with me earlier today regarding the CO for this project. It has been a very frustrating road and it was calming to talk with a rational professional. At this point I believe our best bet will be to request a temporary or partial CO to permit the event we 12/6/2006 Message Page 2 of 2 discussed and described below: There will be an event for @ 150 people on site next week, I believe the 14th and 15th, that requires use only of the East Ballrooms and the kitchen. Any guests will be housed in the casitas. No access will be provided to the lobby, restaurant area, any of the hotel ammenities (spa, fitness center, etc) or any of the hotel guest rooms. I have a call in to Sonia Cooley with the Riverside County Fire Safety Department to find out what can be done to expedite her portion of this project. As soon as I hear back from her, I will certainly let you know. Thank you again and I will be in touch. Just so you know, Fidelity Information Servies, Inc., the company I work for, and Chicago Title are both under the same corporate umbrella. In other words, just because my business card says one thing doesn't mean I can't have multiple bosses. Jon Yost jypgt@fnf.com cell: 904 465-2524 Fidelity Information Services, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204 12/6/2006 Steve Traxel Greg Butler cient: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:41 PM To: Jim Janosik (E-mail) Cc: 'Walter Brandes (E-mail)'; 'Neal Stephenson (E-mail)'; Steve Traxel Subject: Embassy Suites - Atrium glass summary THIS IS AN UPDATE TO AN E-MAIL ORIGINALLY SENT ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 2004. THE DIFFERENCES ARE: JIM JANOSIK OF THE KIETH COMPANIES IS INCLUDED IN THE RECIPIENT LIST; AND AN ADDITIONAL ITEM HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE "CONCLUSIONS" SECTION. ALL REVISIONS FROM THE ORIGINAL ARE SET IN ALL CAPS. THANKS, GREG Gentlemen, This is a follow-up to our recent conversations regarding the windows in the guest room walls that are common to the atrium. It is intended as a summary of my interpretation of these discussions and code research. I welcome your input if additions deletions or corrections seem necessary prior to enforcement in the field. Background: • Certain guest rooms adjacent to the atrium have 5050 fixed windows in the wall common to the atrium, near the guest room entry door. The area of the wall, when scaled from interior elevation drawings in the approved plan set, measures approximately 112 square feet. Relevant Code sections: • 402.3 - Enclosure of Atria • 2406 - Safety Glazing }scussion: • The basic requirement of Section 402.3 is that fixed glazed openings in the atrium enclosure must be fire windows with a fire -resistive rating of at least 3/4 hour and may not exceed 25 percent of the area of the common wall. • Exception 1 does not apply, since the only exit from the guest rooms is through the atrium. Exception 2 allows the use of fixed wired glass set in steel frames. In lieu of the wired glass, tempered or laminated glass may be used if set in a gasketed frame per Exception 2.2. • Exception 2.1 requires that this no -wired glass be protected by quick response sprinkler heads that flood the entire glass surface. Since walking surface occur on both sides of the glass, both sides of the glass must be afforded this protection. • Additionally, Exception 2.4 requires that no obstructions (curtains, drapes, their rods, or other obstructions) may be placed between the sprinkler and the glass. • Because the 5050 window is less than 25 percent of the wall area (112 s.f. x 0.25 = 28 s.f.; 5 x 5 = 25; 25 s.f. < 28 s.f.), the window size is acceptable. • Because the 5050 window is adjacent to the guest room entry door, and in most cases is within 24 inches of it, the location qualifies as a hazardous locations per 2406.4, Item 6. Section 2406 requires safety glazing (typically laminated or tempered) in these locations. Conclusions: • Safety glazing must be used at these locations. • FIRE WINDOWS HAVING A FIRE -RESISTIVE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN THREE -FOURTHS HOUR MAY BE USED, IF ALSO CERTIFIED TO COMPLY WITH UBC STANDARD 24-2, PART I FOR HUMAN IMAPCT LOADS. • Polished wired glass may be utilized without the special sprinkler protection if the glazing can be certified to comply with UBC Standard 24-2, Part II. • Tempered or laminated complying with UBS Standard 24-2, Part I may be used if provided with quick response sprinkler heads protecting each side of the glass. These heads must be located close enough to the glass to preclude the future installation of any obstruction between the sprinkler heads and the glass. • The architectural plans are actually drawn correctly, requiring tempered glass in gasketed frames. This design would require certain significant changes in the current fire sprinkler design. • The owner/design team seems to have two options: Redesign the sprinkler system, or call out different glass. Thank you for your help in dealing with these issues as they arise. Certificate of Occupancy ._Building & Safety Departmen# This Certificate -is. issued pursuant to -the requirements -of Section: X109. of the California 4Building ' .. Coale, certifjring that; at th`e time ' of issuance, this structure ..was : in , compliance .with "the _ provisions of:ahe,.Building Code and. the various ordinances of the City regulating:.'buildIng ' construction' and/or'use. BUILDING ADDRESS, 50-777 Santa Rosa Plaza Use classification: Hotel Building 'Permit.No.: 0211.-108'&`'031.2=24.0. :Occupancy Group: A2.1, M. B,;R1 Type of Cgnstruction 11-F:R. Land Use Zone: VC Owner of Building: Santa -Rosa Plaza, LLC Buildi Official POST -IN A CONSPICUOU Address: P-0. Box 1503 City, ST; ZIP: La Quinta,.CA 92247-1503 By: Steve.. Traxel Date: October 24, 2006 E I