The URL can be used to link to this page

2000 01 18 CCdt � T c&t,, 4 V S FCFM of A* CALL TO ORDER a. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Council Members: PUBLIC COMMENT City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting January 18. 2000 - 2:00 P.M. Beginning Res. No. 2000-03 Ord. No. 338 Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a), EXISTING LITIGATION, CITY OF LA QUINTA vs. JEFFERY A. COLE, ET.AL RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. INCO14013. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956(a), EXISTING LITIGATION , CITY OF LA QUINTA vs. ART FERNANDEZ. NOTE: TIME PERMITTING, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONDUCT CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSIONS DURING THE DINNER RECESS. ADDITIONALLY, PERSONS IDENTIFIED AS NEGOTIATING PARTIES WHERE THE CITY IS CONSIDERING ACQUISITION OF THEIR PROPERTY ARE NOT INVITED INTO THE CLOSED SESSION MEETING. PUBLIC COMMENT - 3:00 PM This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. 001 CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Minutes of January 4, 2000. ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. LETTER REGARDING DONATION OF A TREE AT THE LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER IN MEMORY OF HAYDEN BOWER. 2. TWO LETTERS REQUESTING WAIVER OF CONDITIONS FOR UNDER -GROUNDING OF UTILITIES IN RANCHO LA QUINTA TRACTS. 3. LETTER REGARDING COMMITTEE ON EXPANSION OF THE HISTORICAL MUSEUM. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar Items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JANUARY 18, 2000. 2. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1999. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER AND THE SENIOR ENGINEER TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, PUBLIC WORKS OFFICERS INSTITUTE IN SAN DIEGO, CA., MARCH 8-10, 2000. 4. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER TO DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION SERVICES FOR CITY-WIDE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 99-07. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNERS INSTITUTE TO BE HELD IN MONTEREY, CA., MARCH 1-3, 2000. 6. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE PLANNING MANAGER AND MEMBERS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE TO ATTEND THE 25TH ANNUAL CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, APRIL 13-16, 2000 IN MONTEREY, CA. 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR AN ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER TO ATTEND THE "NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION TRAINING ACADEMY" GIVEN BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING INSTITUTE SCHOOL OF LAW -EXTENSION DIVISION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA, FEBRUARY 21-25, 2000 IN SACRAMENTO, CA. -2- 0 0 42) 8. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, TO UTILIZE THE STUDY SESSION ROOM FOR APPLICANT TESTING ON JANUARY 20, FEBRUARY 3, FEBRUARY 16, MARCH 2, AND MARCH 15, 2000 FROM 9:00 A.M. TO NOON. 9. APPROVAL OF A PROPOSAL FOR AN OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) GRANT APPLICATION FOR A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMPONENT. 10. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 28340-2, KSL LAND CORPORATION. 11. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF A TABLE FOR THE LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 6T" ANNUAL GALA IN THE AMOUNT OF $750.00. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF CITIZEN TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE DETAILS OF THE SITE AMENITIES TO BE INCORPORATED IN THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 97-09. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 12 (THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2000) AND PROPOSITION 13 (THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT). A. RESOLUTION ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE "FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF RECIPIENT FOR THE "LIVING FOR YOUR 90'S" SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD PROGRAM. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 6. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY PARK NORTH MASTER PLAN A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 0 0 v 7. CONSIDERATION OF COMMEMORATIVE TREE AND PLAQUE ALONG THE BEAR CREEK TRAIL. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 8. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF KSL'S REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIFY ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION STUDY SESSION DISCUSSION OF FAIRWAY ADVERTISING'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S BILLBOARD REGULATIONS. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1 . CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (SNIFF) 3 C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEES 7. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (HENDERSON) 8. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS AIRLINE SERVICES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 9 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 10. RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 13. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 14. MINUTES OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD FOR DECEMBER 8, 1999 15. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION FOR DECEMBER 13, 1999 16. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR DECEMBER 14, 1999 17. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FOR NOVEMBER 17, 1999 18. MINUTES OF THE ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR DECEMBER 8, 1999. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1999 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1999 004 -4- 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1999 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR A. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1999 AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1999 9. POLICE CHIEF A. MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER, 1999 10. BATTALION CHIEF A. QUARTERLY REPORT MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER POLICY (HENDERSON) RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for a public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000- 2001. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 2. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 53-495 AVENIDA HERRERA BY AND BETWEEN CORRINE GUTIERREZ AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. A. MINUTE ACTION ADJOURNMENT -5- 005 DECLARATION OF POSTING 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of January 18, 2000 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros., 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, January 14, 2000. DATED: January 14, 2000 JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICE The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. 006 In WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: 12/29/99 City of LaQuinta LaQuinta, CA; 92253 Dear Mayor Pena & City Council Members: Mrs. Marilyn Smith has informed me that I must have your approval to donate a tree to the city to be planted near the Senior Center building to honor the memory of 1 layden Bower who passed away in the fall. Chaim of events that followed: Originally I intended to present his widow kluricl with a lice For Iheir vard. Muriel suggested we plant it at the Senior ('enter whene I Inden did volunteer- %voik. Marilyn Smith concurred with this suggestion as the center needs more shade trees. We needed City approval. Mr. Daniel Jewett, a nursery owner, heard of our intentions, and told us he would give its the tree. Also deliver and plant it upon city approval. It is questionable at this phase as to who should be submitting this petition to you. Should it be Muriel, Daniel Jewett, or me? Please accept this petition on behalf of all three. Thank you for your assistance. It is much appreciated. i Alice Bailes [cell P.O. Box 1057 La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: 564 0700 007 fa WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: RANCHO LA QUINTA December 30, 1999 C O U NTRY C L U B Community Development Department City of La Quinta 48-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Mr. Jerry Herman Dear Sir: In accordance with the City of La Quinta Codes, Chapter 8.03 (Electric Code), Article 120-6, T.D. Desert Development L.P. hereby respectfully requests a waiver of conditions included in the below listed tract maps which require certain utility lines to be removed from power poles and placed underground. Tract 27840 Tract 27835 Tentative Tract 29306 Tentative Tract 29283 The utility lines in question run along Ave. 48 from Adams Street to Jefferson, along Jefferson from Ave. 48 to our southeastern property boundary (approximately 2/3 mile) and along Ave. 50 from our property boundary directly across Ave. 50 from Orchard Lane to our southwestern boundary (approximately 1/2 mile). The poles in these locations have both high voltage and low voltage electric lines along with telephone and cable TV lines. The Imperial Irrigation District will not allow us to underground the high voltage lines. Therefore, if we underground the above described utility lines, except for the high voltage electric lines, the power poles and high voltage electric lines will remain overhead and the result will be little or no improvement to the street scene. Undergrounding the Ave. 48 lines would cost over $1,150,000 according to the Imperial Irrigation District. At this rate, the cost to underground all the above mentioned power lines for the entire Rancho La Quinta project would be in excess of $2,000,000. This is an extremely large expenditure for little or no benefit. Thank you for your consideration of thins matter. Sincerely, HOME OF Michael E. Hulme Project Manager/Project Manager !t69 7 - 9L8 008 79-285 RANCHo LA QUINTA DRIVE • LA QUINTA, CA 92253 • 760-777-7747 • FAX 760-777-7787 JAN-05-2000 100 RRNCHO LA QUINTA R,A.NCHO LA QUINTA January 5, 2000 C O L' N T R Y C L U Fi Community Development Department City of La Quinta 48-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Mr. Jerry Herman Dear Sir: 619 777 7767 P.02 In accordance with the City of La Quinta Cedes, Chapter 8.03 (Electric Code), Article 120-6, T.D. Desert Development L.P. hereby respectfully requests a waiver of conditions included in the below listed tentative tract map which require certain utility lines to be removed from power poles and placed underground. Tentative Tract 29457 The utility lines in question run along Ave. 48 from Adamn; Street to Jefferson, along Jefferson from Ave. 48 to our southeastern property boundary (approximately 2f3 mile) and along Ave. 50 from. our property boundary directly across Ave. 50 from Orchard Lane to our southwestern boundary (approximately 1/2 mile). The poles in these locations have both high voltage and low voltage electric lines along with telephone and cable TV lines. The Imperial irrigation District will not allow us to underground the high voltage lines. Therefore, if we underground the above described utility lines, except for the high voltage electric lines, the power poles and high voltage electric lines will remain overhead and the result will be little or no improvement to the street scene. Undergrounding the Ave. 48 lines would cost over $1,150,000 according to the Imperial Irrigation District. At this rate, the cost to underground all the above mentioned power lines for the entire Rancho La Quinta project would be in excess of $2,000,000. This is an extremely large expenditure for little or no benefit. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, r 1 Michael E. Hulme Project Manager/Project Manager toM9 o 9h795 79.28a Rk4cm) LA, Q1:1,Wra PP1%F,. • La Q,',;T41A, CA. '>2 .5-8 Tht)..trT.TT•ti! • my 77r,T TOTAL P.02 009 LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY P.O. Box 1283 La Quinta, CA 92253 (760)564-1283 President Barbara Irwin Executive Vice President/Secretary Judy Vossler Vice President Don Arends Treasurer Jeanne Kirkpatrick Docent Director Louise Neeley Membership Director Jaqueline Wright Directors Diane Adolph Honey Atkins Marge Cleveland Pat Cross JoAnne Hiles John Hiles Beverly Montgomery Cheryl Schuler Inge Vorderwinkler Advisory Council Don Arends - Chairman Martha Arends Kris Capra Tom Capra Dr. Edward Cleveland Marge Cleveland John Dimmer Marilyn Dimmer George O'Leary Buddy Rodgers Mike Schuler Cheryl Schuler MUSEUM 77-885 Avenida Montezuma La Quinta, California WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ITEM: 3 RECEIVED January 12, 2000 La Quinta City Council P O Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Members of the Council: 2000 JAN 12 PM 2: 16 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE It was suggested at a recent City Council meeting that a committee be formed to develop and consider proposals to expand the Historical Museum. The committee would be composed of one or more members of Council and a comparable number of representatives of the Historical Society. To that end the La Quinta Historical Society wishes to nominate Pat Cross, Barbara Irwin and Judy Vossler as it's representatives. We are anxious for this committee begin its important work. Sincerely, Barbara Irwin Don Adolph Terry Henderson Ron Perkins Stan Sniff, Mayor Pro Tern John Pena, Mayor 010 M T4ht 4 XA Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated January 18, 2000 RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Prepaid Warrants: 39660 - 396921 39693 - 397031 39704 - 397061 Wire Transfers} P/R 4322 - 43921 P/R Tax Transfers; Payable Warrants: 39707 - 398051 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City Approve Demand Register Dated January 18, 2000 ohn . Falconer, Fin nce Director 19,312, 56 43,956.26 35,540.00 77,847.03 94,740.06 26,860.68 CITY DEMANDS 678,906.06 RDA DEMANDS $977,162.65 $866,569.79 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING $866,569.79 110,592.86 $977,162.65 01.�. CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 12/30/99 - 1 /12/00 1/7/00 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP 1/7/00 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 1/7/00 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION 1/5/00 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW $6,806.32 $15,016.39 $6,024.32 $50,000,00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $77,847.03 O1 q ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:53AM 01/12/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39707 01/12/00 &00979 MIKE BUTVIDAS 300.00 39708 01/12/00 &00980 CLASSIC MARBLE CORP 50.00 39709 01/12/00 &00981 WILLIAM DAVIDSON 60.00 39710 01/12/00 &00982 KATIE PORTOLESI 60.00 39711 01/12/00 &00983 LISA A SAPIDA 25.00 39712 01/12/00 &00984 T D DESERT DEVELOPMENT 200.00 39713 01/12/00 &00985 PIERRE FOURNIER 12.00 39714 01/12/00 ABL001 ABLE RIBBON TECH 176.04 39715 01/12/00 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 1142.29 39716 01/12/00 ALL015 ALL AMERICAN PIN CO 1469.63 39717 01/12/00 AND050 ANDY'S AUTO REPAIR 305.06 39718 01/12/00 ARC100 ARCH 46.46 39719 01/12/00 ASCO01 A & S COFFEE SERVICE 368.00 39720 01/12/00 ATC010 ATCO MANUFACTURING CO 409.60 39721 01/12/00 AT0010 A TO Z PARTY RENTALS 328.70 39722 01/12/00 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 289.85 39723 01/12/00 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 225.36 39724 01/12/00 BAR200 BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR 394.22 39725 01/12/00 BEI050 R BEIN, W FROST & ASSOC 16553.57 39726 01/12/00 BER150 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC 10608.00 39727 01/12/00 BRI100 BRINKS INC 265.00 39728 01/12/00 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 106.00 39729 01/12/00 CAL080 CA SOC MUNCIPAL FINANCE 232.00 39730 01/12/00 CAP050 ROSMARY CAPUTO 84.00 39731 01/12/00 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 57.87 39732 01/12/00 COA030 COACHELLA VALLEY INSURANC 2502.00 39733 01/12/00 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 278.78 39734 01/12/00 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 854.05 39735 01/12/00 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 2142.20 39736 01/12/00 DIE020 D HERNANDEZ DBA DIEGO'S 65.00 39737 01/12/00 EAG100 EAGLE/HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB 228.13 39738 01/12/00 EVA050 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 15095.44 39739 01/12/00 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 246.21 39740 01/12/00 FRA030 FRANKLIN COVEY 351.75 39741 01/12/00 FRI045 FRIENDS OF DESERT MNTNS 250.00 39742 01/12/00 HEG050 JIM HEGGE 1646.00 39743 01/12/00 HIL150 HILTON FARNKOPF & 870.00 39744 01/12/00 HOL030 HOLMES & NARVER INC 18795.33 39745 01/12/00 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 15.35 39746 01/12/00 IAP050 IAPMO 150.00 39747 01/12/00 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 5398.81 39748 01/12/00 INL200 INLAND POWER EQUIPMENT CO 290.87 39749 01/12/00 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 150.00 39750 01/12/00 JAC200 JACOBSSON ENGINEERING INC 40964.40 39751 01/12/00 JPRO10 JP REPROGRAPHICS 679.84 39752 01/12/00 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 8635.63 39753 01/12/00 KLI050 BOB KLINE FENCE CO 95.00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:53AM 01/12/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 39754 01/12/00 KRI100 BRUCE KRIBBS CONSTRUCTION 3116.00 39755 01/12/00 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 38750.00 39756 01/12/00 LIT200 LITTLE TYKES COMMERCIAL 6183.17 39757 01/12/00 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 38.32 39758 01/12/00 LUC050 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 529.44 39759 01/12/00 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 32797.70 39760 01/12/00 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 48.43 39761 01/12/00 MOM100 MOM'S GAS STATION 840.95 39762 01/12/00 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 7827.68 39763 01/12/00 NAW010 RON NAWROCKI 2400.00 39764 01/12/00 NIC100 NICKERSON, DIERCKS & ASSC 1215.06 39765 01/12/00 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 77.84 39766 01/12/00 OUT100 OUTDOOR SERVICES INC 100.00 39767 01/12/00 PAG100 PAGING NETWORK SAN DIEGO 32.08 39768 01/12/00 PAR030 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 161.18 39769 01/12/00 PER010 RONALD A PERKINS 25.07 39770 01/12/00 PER100 PERSONAL TOUCH MOBILE 30.00 39771 01/12/00 POW100 POWERS AWARDS 445.28 39772 01/12/00 RAL050 RALPHS GROCERY CO 87.02 39773 01/12/00 RIV020 RIV CNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLR 42.00 39774 01/12/00 RIV083 RIV CNTY INFORMATION 840.00 39775 01/12/00 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 214593.69 39776 01/12/00 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 41103.46 39777 01/12/00 SAL050 DAVID SALES 250.00 39778 01/12/00 SAX100 SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE 4200.00 39779 01/12/00 SEC050 SECURITY LINK/AMERITECH 453.36 39780 01/12/00 SHAO10 SHADOW PALMS GARDENING 150.00 39781 01/12/00 SIE100 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL 70485.75 39782 01/12/00 SKY100 SKYCELL 55.12 39783 01/12/00 SMA010 SMART & FINAL 146.51 39784 01/12/00 SOCO10 THE SOCO GROUP INC 57.20 39785 01/12/00 SOU007 SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC 3209.56 39786 01/12/00 SOU010 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 826.28 39787 01/12/00 SPRO10 SPRINT 621.36 39788 01/12/00 STA020 STANDARD REGISTER 1552.38 39789 01/12/00 STA045 STAN'S AUTO TECH 78.49 39790 01/12/00 STA050 STAPLES 793.16 39791 01/12/00 SUR100 SURVIVOR INDUSTRIES INC 477.97 39792 01/12/00 TOP010 TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 359.56 39793 01/12/00 TTI100 TTI NATIONAL INC 8.21 39794 01/12/00 ULT100 ULTIMATE INTERNET ACC INC 63.00 39795 01/12/00 USO100 US OFFICE PRODUCTS 720.24 39796 01/12/00 VAL005 VALLEY ANIMAL CLINIC 78.90 39797 01/12/00 VAN075 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC INC 1275.00 39798 01/12/00 VER010 ROMANO VERLENGIA 19.46 39799 01/12/00 VER050 FREDRICO VERDUGO 250.00 39800 01/12/00 WAL010 WAL MART STORES INC 30.21 39801 01/12/00 WES020 WEST GROUP 493.50 39802 01/12/00 WIL010 WILLDAN ASSOCIATED 794.63 014 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF 10:53AM O1/12/00 PAGE 3 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE NO. 39803 01/12/00 XERO10 39804 01/12/00 YEA100 39805 01/12/00 YOU100 VENDOR NAME PAYMENT AMOUNT XEROX CORPORATION 218.74 E.L. YEAGER CONST CO INC 103329.66 YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE 3150.00 CHECK TOTAL 678,906.06 015 5 rl N I'1 d' If) l0 O .-1 � lD m � � ^S O Ill "J N Ill Ill r•) ti d' Ill � 1p 0 O . Z H H N 'J .-� p ,� U {q n o H r 0 H r 0 F 0 F H F E E F H E F F F F H H N a O O O O O Ei � a 2 p � y p p O O O 0 p O O In 0 O O 10 0 O p 10 0 O In N 0 O O O 0 0 0 m 0 N m O) n rl 10 m \D f�l 10 nl In 0 0 o W n 0 a o o 0 0 0 o 0 a n O 0 o a10 O a0 H V] U] U 2 o a U Ojp m W Fp, l `Z z H . NOp z F a ..4 E U' OF a a Eppp+ z F m a z OEp ul H a OHp F w p w H F W. o O F w O O O O O A O z W O a W a W a W a W W a a W a W a W a W a �Z m Q z z z w z z w z z w zz z w zz zz w zz t 114 a u) w n a a a a a a z m um ul m m m m w rn m m w m m w w pi N !0 N n m /'1 N O L H I O H > C7 O 'L O a N 41 01 r m N I(1 O! r+ 0) 1[1 O to n Ifl m m U'1 Ill m Il) m Ill N Ill N Ill a w � w w o F a o w a r r•1 o ID o n O r o vl O 0 o 10 O O o .1 O n m m O n m /'1 0 r m I'J O n r m m rl nl O O 10 l0 rn rl n m rl O r m m O r m m O r O U U O O O O O O o In In In In In In \0 O r In n in In U H p � ti O •-1 O '-1 O H O .--1 O N O e-i O e-1 O .-1 O .-+ O '-1 O O '-I H O 111 O rl O ti O .-1 E+ z In O �y a OU as Z o H a W OG wz1 U a P4 , O o H z Z a z Pyw U 3 a4 a E. a <C 4 a¢ 4 4 E a O > M: 0) r O m '-I m N m rl m Vr m lr In m lr .a O O O .a O O �'-� O O H O O O .J "I O O O "J O O - O O O O 0 1 O u F H. O 0 0) o 0 m o 0 O O 0 0) o 0 0 0 0 o aJ at W W d w 6 w w 4 w 4 w W 6 w a a 6 ,7. r m . O . N . . . . r m z 0 0 N \ N x o o H , o 0 04 Pa H HP H H P H H H H E- H F H Ei F H H H H H H H F H H H F H F H H W N N m O l0 1p H m l0 ."1 In t0 l0 n 10 lD O O O O O n z 1p Ol N - Ul o Ifl H m r r r C11 I(1 to N m O H to o m l0 O d' d' N O O N N a ol rn to l0 O o o N to o a o lD r to M o� a ao d' to a o n d' to O a w a N n H o m H W U w In a o off Gwa R m w o ° .� w m m m m m m m m o m m m rz �a o x > o m m m m m x x O H W H W H W H W H W H W H H W H U W H W H W H O a W m O o W a O m a O c] G] H W H O W (] F W H O m N .y O Ll a z H u a a a a aL a s ay a a a a z z u z x z a a z a W 11 z o z o O O { 7 p ] O a 5 H > W > fC > 5 p 7 O W m m m m m m m m m w m m m U > w m m m m x V w w V W N 1 K p W O itt O .--� In V' N m N n to N In N o o m to m ut `L z W m m m .--1 lfl l0 N lD In Ol N In r T O O I m m m .-� H ^t lD H O z Ifs l(1 t!1 l(1 lf1 l[1 11'1 I[1 I(1 trl l[1 lfl O N r] N N 1() Vl O N H .Y. ti a w w m a 0 o w H o O r r O o W N o o o o o o lD m m cP .r o to w m w m o m m m m m m m m w m o 0 0 0 0 to l(t to m m m m o to F O o m In o In In z o o 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 o o H lo o o 0 o 0 o o H to to r r r r to to to 0 l[1 l[t u'1 vl ll� ul l[1 ul o lfl In ul O o ul v1 In N ltl o lfl ° d' a �1' d' �-1' •1' d' V' H r'1 Nt N N i11 H .� H c} d' N H U r� O .-� o H O rl O .� O .-� O •-I O .-� O .-i O H o H O H O .-� O .-� O Ifl O H O H O .� O IH o O H O .� 0 a! w H 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a a o a w U 4 w U 4 w w U U t 4 w U <C w U 4 w U 4 w U 4 w U 4 w w w U U U 4 < 4 Hm W 2 O > a ;. U 0 H 0 n H 0 o 0 H H 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 H 0 0 H 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 H H 0 0 0 E� U � t U W U r.0 W U rS W W U U 2 RC W V a: W U Q W U 6 w U a W U � W W W U U U C t RC O O OU W W U U U] a > > z z H H W w w % PH4 W m m 7 zw H 5 w w 4 O O N m m ? x O O OIz a ui o o 0 0 o n o o O H H + O o a Q H O U O U O U 0 O U t pOG o En 4 tn Q El d 6 6 m W U a w m co En w w a 3 F 4 017 0 0 U z l0 ei r H m H O1 ri r-1 N M •'} Ifl 10 r T 0 O H N M 'Q 1f1 to r m m O r♦ N M 0 W d M 7 x � H H � H E � rl E �'-� H F o H H r 0 r-1 H r 0 H F r 0 ri E r 0 H H r 0 H F r 0 ri H r 0 H H r o H H r O H E r o H H r o H H r O H E r o H F r 0 H F r o H H r O .-i E r O ri F r o H E r O H H r r O O ri H E N o N lO N N r iri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w W O O O O M O� a O i fJ N M N lD rl r-i CD N N N m a FwF,i m M if1 F � m � W U z ODI H H u > m O a pEp H U ppF E H a x pm H u FEo E z o m a w off h U u u U U u u U U x U x u x U x U x u x u x U x U x U x U x U x x U U H O a H a a O > m a O a O a O U z > O `n W x u w x u w x Uuu w x u w x u w x u w x u w x u w x w x U w x u w x w x U w x u w x u w x w x w x u w x u w x w w x x U u zU H n W 'Q7 �' a a z > " Z > zW a > � N N � N zi ,Zuy . N N u �7 zi � u N ruu ruu W [+. i n a U rn 04 H W o W W W Pi P. W P. W P. P. W P. 04 W 04 W W W Pi W M W z H H Z H A7 `J Z l(1 r- r O Ol .-� of D\ r - r .(1 r ul r I(t OJ � dD � dD ul m r vt m r .(1 M ni lf1 W ut W N r vl W � m V1 r vl 0 r� In m r N to O m ul t W r Vl O a m m r r ut t(1 H x a w cn a 0 o o w F • a W � a O 'O �D O IP ID O o O N r r r r r r r r r r r - r - r - r - r - r - r r Ln Ln m r r 1[1 Ifl Z H z M 10 M W M N to O 0 10 OJ O 0 10 N 0 O ko N O 0 lD N m O ko N 0 O lD N 0� O 1D N 0 O qo N 0 O l0 N m O to N m O lD N O 0 0 N O O lD N 0 O t0 N O O t0 N m O to N m O kO N O 0 lD N O 0 0 N 0 O W N T O tD N 0 01 O O to W N N 5 0 U Lfl .-i N H t(t N m ID I l(1 Ifl N I(1 H 1f1 l[t l[1 �[1 H Ifl th t(1 lfl t[1 U"1 Ul I[1 lfl 111 Ifl t(1 U t o N 0 H 0 H 0 •y 0 H 0 r-i 0 0 H 0 0 H 0 0 H 0 H 0 0 r-I H 0 H H 0 rJ 0 .-i H 0 H 0 0 .-i H 0 'i 0 0 .-I 0 0 H H 0 � H 0 r-I 0 0 .a H 0 '-1 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 .-I H m W N U O W Vj U Z H U Z H U Z H U z U Z H U z H U 'Z H U z H U Z H O z U Z H U Z U Z U Z H U z H U Z H U Z U Z H U z H U x H U U 2 Z H H M O O Ill m U O a rt'i EA. H H H �Hj /Y H H H H H H �Hj 4 H H H H �Hj W H rHv� n. H H H H H �^H✓� rY H H H H H H In.7 Cl) H a m O w z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x Z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x z W x Z W x z z W W x x al w En z s s w a w w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m w w w w w w w w w w w ao E R Z O 5 O [� J r o M 0 O 0 �[1 o V1 O 1f1 o �(1 0 l(1 0 �fl o I(1 O ul O �I1 o ifl 0 ifl o �[t O Il1 o 0 0 0 ul o O o ifl O ul o O ul U H U H RC U H F d F 5 RC CZ 4 W H W W a W W a W tG a W fA a W W a W P7 a W W a W {A a W PG a W Pl a W G1 a W Oq a W F1 a W R1 a W W a W R1 a W GI a W W a W W a W W a W {G a a W W W W 6 H m m m m d' H rl m OD m 0. H z 0 0 N H 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 H .-a Ir 0 O h H h O 0 o W U a H a m H H H H H H H r-1 F H rl E H H H .-1 H H .-1 H E H �-1 H - H F H rl F H '1 ElH H H H H E .y H N o H F rl E H F E H H F E � w N O O O O O O O O O O O O N m O O O O h O O O O E-I o o O o 0 o O O o O O O C� O O O O O m o O O E N N O O LO m d' V w 10 ' ON ON N O O In H Ifl H 01 10 01 m m m H Y H m 10 m N N N N to to Vl H H 1 1 1 I 1 N N N w 1 1 0 o 0 0 0 m m I(1 10 O D D N O H m N m u N o a F O In z 0 0 z x m U HEA m H z O F H F E H H H H H H O O H H H O w M a ❑ a ❑ a A a an a a O a ❑ non u ❑ p O a O ❑ H O H H F F E F E E F E H a O ❑ pr O m E m � m E m A a U U E OA. a O V) w P4 14 O U z H a U a U U U U a U a U a U U a U m> ❑ 0 A w o o? m w m> : m> tJ w C) 0 0 0 a°c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z o o z a n z o o U] w w u U u u U u u u u u a 0 o a U U H m H u u 0 � a o CW 04 04 o ry w m vi O 0 o O m m a a a H A z z H m m m m m h h h r` m m to 0 O O to l0 �1' to to to H .'L IL'1 ul Yl U1 In In In 4l to u1 N O l0 O 0 H O H O - O to C m 10 m 1D m 1D a w a m m a 1 0 0 w H o 0 0 0 0 0 o N o w n ui n ui n 1n n In n In n In In v In u In n � 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a,0 0 o 0 h 0 0 h 0 0 h rn Ol rn (T 01 01 O1 (T rn 01 t- h h h m m m 0) h In In to Z O O O O O O O O O O O H H .-1 d dt v 0 10 10 w 10 0 10 10 lD 10 w ID 10 ID to ID 10 LO 10 10 ID 1D 10 In N In �l to to Vl l0 10 Ifl �o In In O O O O 0 0 0 0 O H H rl U U H H H H H H H H H f-I H H H H a O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O u U r77u., U z u z u z u z u z U z u z u z u z u z U z U U 04 >W >4 zz z to z m Z u1DD� z o o O O C7 c•1 t� (9 C7 t9 C'J t� ❑ ] o z to H z H z H z H z H z H z H z H z H z H z V) U1 U) H W W W w w w w w w w w w w a w w 1 W F x x x x x x x x x 1d x �� Z O 0 o V U U a w OW Ti 2i H H H U a a am uwz awUJQI apopz> aWm pW�.W0 Gi pWmH auHml w ww p w u) V�Vp! U[xay ao W W W W a ul w ooW 0 m W mm U u u u u u U 019 0 0 0 1mH0 0 tryWHmo 0 0 0 tHmo 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 m HN 0 000[axOe mU u w W W w w W Hpm W 0O O O0 0 O O O O au mmmmmmmmmm u u uuu u w u u O u u In ID In 0 r- m ol H N d' r m m m m d' 0) m O a• d' to lD r d' m e OI d. O m m m m m m m \ Ca, \ 0 r In ❑ E F 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 F 0 F 0 H 0 H H F 0 E- H H 0 H 0 H 0 F 0 E 0 H 0 F N H L t� F V1 m r o H C1 a NV' N r H In m N m O N m O m O O m m O In m m O In In d' O o ID OI '' In -It O In H ID ~ In m N a U N O o N 0 O In Q• O N O n r r N y' In m N d, In ID \ m W N In O In m z[E�+ m z�a m z z O O0 0 . >HH .4 Wp > Ea I w up D, D+ S > m >A ❑ H H H H M S U U U U S a S ZRM W q arOm H z V] S x H H H z H u z m w D w x w z a w CL a W a M a W a a z w W w > z z w z z > zd w w > N •C e w x > H w 3 3 a m m m o m m m o U 0 U 0 o U u a u w 5c 5 m w El w ac a O O O m w H O w 14 ❑ A: m O O G O H O H O m ID O H O O N In O O In Om • In 0 O N m 0 O N m 0 O N m H ❑ z H H �p O N In .1 IN In .--� m H m m H m m H m N m m N m m N N m m m N ti m ID In In r In r to r O O O ❑ H y > O IrO In V In d' d, V d' In Ul Ul Ifl H m N O O O r r r w w O m a o w w m ip m Ip O m m m m O O 0 ID 0 O m In In m In - O m m In In In In O O In ID l0 � O 00 O O m O O O m O O 0 O � O N m ul m O 0 O O In O m In In m O N m in In O O O O m 7 y O u m ID y Ln d' H m ID It In ? H O r m In H O r- m m H H O r H m .-� H O 0 m o H O r ti o H O In H o H In N to 1n In o In H ID In H r In H r r In ID 10 m ID H ID m m ID H ID OI r \D ID N 1D H kD 0) lD H ID m .--I H U O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 O O O w w VQ z z z m 3 3 w q w O w ❑ w q w O ❑ a W W 0 m 0 to 0 m 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 In W a W s m m vl m m m m m m m U z H U z H U U z z H H m RC o q 0 ❑ 0 m `y `y m m °fix m In m m z z In z z If) z m �� m m E N o w � w a mz a mz Fc m z'a W W w a H z 4 a s w w 0 w w m o E. a F s F F a zd z w m w •C a U U 0 H H 0 F 0 H E w m w m oHc w In m m a CJ q > ❑ j q > A A W m iC a 0 z 0 v 0 0 u m 0 v m 0 u m 0 u m 0 v m o u w ❑❑❑❑ w w w ❑ m m 0 ❑❑❑ 6 0 w w w w w w p o m 0 co 0 In 0 0 0 In 0 In 0 0 In In 0 In In w w O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 I O 0 n O 0 I O 0 0H 0 OH 0 0 020 U NH OO O m O O m O U O m O u O mm O u O O u m w ❑ O m w ❑ m m w w ❑ ❑ q W U 4 w > W > W > W ❑ W W ❑ W W W w u u V n 1 V U H N n d' In N D\ ID In In H ID rl r In n 0) m 01 m N m In V DI In DI ID !T CI O 1n In ul ul In z O O \ N H \ D x U o o o o 0 0 0 0 o H o EJ El El H E H H E H E F F a Pa E E H H E H N O O O n s O d' m In lD m 10 H L In Ol Ifl n n In ID C' O r O r O r In In H In In N V' 0 In lD H r O H n n Ul N lD m m m r H N 0 H H I m f � w H In o 0 0 0 H O ID O In m O in In In n fJ LD 1p r m r H N H Z m O OH HH a O t� Hpp P4 pHo Hpp GG77 GG77 pHp z OH p Epp Fpp > 9 D > D W H pHp H E RC H H H a H H E H F w E E. �x a s °� o o a u a m x m x u u u u u O H U' a m O W m W m [� W W a z D O 6 0 a O I-+ O Q O O W 0 Q a, if U z a a 7 a H z RC z m U U z E Z a Z W Z E F E E H w> a. � a 0 > z> °pp� o o o � a a a a a Q qoq rn r W W W [+7 W 4 H rC U U U W w U W N m m m m m m m r In In O O O In Ul In m ID N O N O N O n O N m DI r ul H O H O H q H O m m m m In H r r r O W H z m In In In m m m N �1' O a RC w w m a 0 o o w H (y� n O O O O O O O O O N cl' N mil' N d' O O n ^� O O n In In In O H N n In ID [>,] Dl in In O O O O O O O O o in In m 0 m O ul In ID ID ID m n n ti n n In O In O Ln O m O n 0 m 't rn O m O r N r N r N z O ID O r O r O 0 r r ID w N ID w ID ID lD r w w w ID w 0 ID H N H r N N N r n H In W m 0 u, d In a In d In r ID In '!' In d' In In d' V in N In n 0 0 o in In d' U c� O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O H O V' O d' O H O H O H H cn O V1 N Q Q O Q Q z�zy E z OH H H OH O W Id W H F0i G�W7 {ram�]] W W 04 [x� J [H� aH aH DH; aH O O O U �CL4 {yam [0 1� RC �C W F a z W W z z z z O W Z a � o, 2 ' 0 0 w Q o z a z a a W ram. z�z� H 0 IE-1 E7 a w.� 1.� WH W.� W m p wH � w w h H x z" 021 p o 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 O O 0 o O o.� nmnn 00 O �T O n O In 0 0 In 0 OOOO O 0 >10 U H w 11 r n H N d T O H r m m O 1 N r1 d I[1 ID N m r z O O ID w LD 0 m O O 0 0 ID r r r r r r r O r r 0 0 N H \ r m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+ o 0 o w H o 0 0 0 0 W � F PPP F E E H H H F F H H H H H H F H F H -r N r O O O O N N N m r1 r O O O m r r1 O O 1D O O O H m O O O d 1' r 1D N r'1 lD O O N O O H `L raj H J o m O d m r N u'1 m m wO O r't D� rD m d m N .-� 0) O� . iD .--� i O N o l0� nt .(1 10 Ot .--1 iD N d H d m d H r1 d m - N In - .-1 H O a -t o o d r1 0 m m o v m D o ao 0 o c m m m m m a w In r1 to rn rn ONr t0 H H U U U U 10 NN W v, W m M vw]vwl w o 0 0 0 w 0 o o 0 o O a w O a w a H z 0 z 0 w H w H U U Tyz a a r`vvn� z ElH H F H >> Z z U Rt >>>> H W Hp p w IUi O H a O m O U H O U O z O H H {{aa77 O a H H H H a 0 O H a > a A A U h A z C] H m m m A i i z m a O E i i W z Ll H w > 5> > a ' o o w o o 0 0 U 0 8> o' w m �' w n 01 a s a a w w m u m w w w w w u a w w w F1 L] O a w \ n \ n d d N z N O1 0) 0) In O r lD .+ ,7, z H q ,'� H x 5 I ID m m 0D m m m o 0 Ifl O O Ir l0 H N m r m r r N O r0 N m H r In d In It N d N d d d Q �I .'1 H H .-1 O1 d N o r1 In N In D1 ui D1 io O� In D1 d 01 In Ln In O1 In O1 In D1 In D1 rD O1 a w w m a I o U w H a W O O O O O O O CD tD O O O O Ul 1 ID N 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N d O O O O O In O O In ul m w m m m m m m m m m m m O OT r1 01 r'1 m r'1 rt r'1 N r1 r1 z 0 r- dn lD ID '�Y OO 10 0 r OID 10 0 10 0 l0 0 1D 0 to 0 0 0 kD 0 dN 10 r0 0 "1r1 10 1D r O 1D 11 10 1 H O m O N I .1 M - r1 N I N - r1 M d ] O In d O 01 O O 01 I(1 O vt N r t0 m 10 m m O m O m O O O O O m O m O m O O O .-I I[1 d tD d U CJ rl I[t 10 lD H .--I H H H In lD' H H H H I(1 ,lD ID lD .•V H H O O O .? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U' U w O G. O w O z H z z m z m z z m rn m z m z z m z z m z z m z z m w m z m O H H H H H H H H H H H H E u � Hat w w w w a a w a H w w z a cHi a > > > > > > > O H u o0o zo N o+ z u u u u w o w H H H H a s 14 �4 14 .4 a s .a a s u u a Wg .] a zz s 0 z w m w m m a w mmmm a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a wA a wA a w z wwWr-I wzO m[aA o U AO A A A A A A A A Wi H 4 z 0 0 0 p p O o O p O p p O p o p Op z w a Ol 'd a w w a ` a ` a a a a a a a a a a a a cz S� J4 w w [t`�l'; z z '' `' �'' ' ' 14 z �Z`' z w a A z Z Z z rS ppII a a a H H H H H H ui H 34 H 9 M Y. H J4 H b4 O In a W 2 U O d d d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O ?+ O N H Oi H 0 H 0�-1 O N r-I O .--I O H O O O H O r-1 O H O H O H O H O .--I O .-I O - O H O H n O O � U H a -1 %. z 4 a a a w oz /� 4 U fz-I H H H I-) h h I-)h .`�. D4 D4 D4 04 D4 �. �4 Y. x Y. (Lf - 1 2 12 Z M m -Y O n lD .I r N � v � 0 r w 01 O H fsH�C zN o r o N m o N o N m o N m m m m m m w 0 0 m O O \ N H O O O O O O O O O O F H E F p H F H F H H H F H E F F �r ro o r N a r M M u 0 o O N m o 0 0 0 0 H F O: O O O m O O o v O J V1 m m O .-1 iD m O M O O m H O O O N r M N m O O ID M ill Ill to lD r a `'a m ID N M M O O r N V' O M In 10 O rat m T r m O H ul m M N O V d' m a m U) M r m r'1 a Q1 iO u r N M m f-I w ❑ [ice ul w \� 0 i o a a °, °' u u u u u u a zo �1 FO a a � H H ry' a m m m m w❑ a9 opi H ❑ o� H O as p p o\ q W H W m M 5 d w N [(m�] ryo� ° Ow m °0 m m wo a % O tC O um m Os 0N o m m0z 0 a ❑ C) o u ❑ r❑o❑ KIHt 0w 0m 0 07m H z z z w w z z U) m z w z P. LO ID r a a a a a a �O w a ❑❑ a w w u u u u u u H ❑ a U z a O w w u a a a a s > u r r r- ❑❑❑❑❑❑ r u o O m W H C W U O lD F1 i O r O In N O ❑ H O O M ID 0 M r M m O O In lD M N m N O O O O O O H z 0 H N N In In O m m lD m m m m m m m m m ❑ � 04 H H H O Vl In a FC m w IA m 0 o w H m M O O O O o 10 o O O 0 O O O O O O W M u't O O O O O d' O O O O O O O O O O In In O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M II"t M 01 r r r r r r r r r r z o 0 0 o M 0 0 O o -+ lD O o o O o O lD lD r lD ID 1p r iD N N " lD lD l0 lD lD lD N [� a O m �n in ut ul in O O O O O O O '1 O dr O H In H O 1* O H O O O � '� ID M H d' c1' N ul O O O m m m m m m O U ?� O O O In to H N O H N H O O O O O O O M H O O H O O O M U a w � a a H o a m w w o W OO w C7 0 u H 0 u UI H a o' w a U a m O w W CL4 w w a a w O z 00 H u O a + a 0 n H a O H o O Ifl u a O In o O O 0 H o ❑o E U u U u U U U U U u z z z z z z z z z z H H H H H H H H H H z w w w w w w w w w w O m77 to m U) ��m77 �U) Iamp �m7 aam �(n7 H H H H H H H H H H H U7 U zzzzzzzzzz U U U U U U U U U U' H H H H FI H H H H H w m w w w w w w w w w z z z z z z z zzf z z O O O O O O O O O O 0 O H H H H H H H H H H E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 13 N ,rl d' I ,D r m m O m 0) O H • O a• m m m m O O O O H H H H O H O p H N N N N N N H N H z O O N H \ O H W U O O O O O O O O O O W E .-A H cq E F F F E E H E E H H F H H H H H E. a v N o m m r o m 2[a7 -t r r ID N d' w r O O �rl H r O o N O r-1 �D v1 N O m -r i In r r N n In In r n O r N ~ Da RG m O ,O d' O OD m r O l0 O O m O O H O O H > > r O E r O N H trl O N m 0 W j r O r1 m N r'1 W q m r N W m U) y rev C7 C7 z z z z z a a 4 u°i a F E z z o o W m a �a i s z a H z r w E E H E H E Hoo > Hoo z Eo H H as vi U H i m rn 0 o O O H m E W H HO p E (i Et H W H .r O C7 D'i a W % z w z Z ° A x O C 0 m ° q 0 0 W O ,4 O N H Ul -r O OI z r/7 z z H w z W W W z � H z z Pi z 01 z z U z 0 w c v r U U U U U a? C9 > z> a> rn q r r r n r r O a O a O a O a O a W ❑ H N O U W E O w a E K. W W r4 H q P4 d m W O1 'J to In 1(1 O1 Q1 O� O� O1 O� N N O O ID 0) Q, 01 H O H N N N O O O O O O O a In a Ot U In 1D H z m m m m m m m m m r 01 m N r1 ID W O 01 V' .❑ 1f1 Irl a a m R1ro D; 1 b. H a O O O 0 O O O 0 O n O n O rn a,0 O w o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o - In o o m m In e iD w rD w w o o a w o o O r- r r r r r r r r D, In rn a, ui 0) In 0) m z kD N w N W N w N lD N to N w N ko N w N O 10 o 1D O to o LO r1 ko H ID rr1 to H lD In rD �-I z 0 O O O O O O O O O V' rl r r1 H r1 H ep O p O o 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o D• rD ID 10 In In N O In + O O U U Irl O O o Vl O I(1 O O O O u z H z H z H z H z M z z H M z H z H m ¢ w H q W O 1[01,11 > x w O1 > a w wrq > a w > x w wam > a w > > a 0 w 0am > a w > a w a a w z ri z H w t V1 p z H z H w o •C 1 � yUy � yU RC yUy 6 zUz d Uzz 6 � ZUZ U �aU.71 6 U am W CHzJ .HY, O H ❑ W � r4 H � W � � E W W. W W U O E U} 3 a z a •L ai ,C z w H RC z w H a z w H 4 z w H 6 z w H 6 z z w w H H z w H RC z w H z z 0 w 9 z Z x 8 ❑ z z ul x ' a qq x o Vi a W D, a o z o z z z z z z z z z 0 o H z 0 N 0 0 o o 0 � w 0 a 0 p W. 0 W a 0 o w 0 0 0 >, 0 H O 0 H 0z 0 , 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 .+ O 0 H 0 o .+ 0 .-, 0 0 0 H w 0 + 0 0 H A 0 H F4 u E E E z E z z E z z z o Cl. %� 14 m vt 1p 1D r r N m H O N H N N N 00 O 01 O �--� H H - .-� H - - ..a O O QZ. O 0 0 � .-� O O .-� .-'� CJ \ H O W U H � O O O H ti H O O O O O O O O O O O O O a -r ri H H E H F H H r1 H F H Pp H P PPPPPEIPPPPP r. H H H H H .-1 H H H N G .� H H O 00 O m d' m H o to O a0 o O r to O O m N N In N N" N O O m N m f O In z 5 Q n H N m m m H N eP o N 0 N d' o 10 Ip d r d' r r d u1 N O m O O O I[t 0 O N r N ut Ifl u'1 �fl o n m o n m N .-i O O m v H 4l O m m N O m a m 10 Cl co CV a N O O m O O O O O E+ 0 cal Ul W w N z W W Pa. H F z a a a yw 2 z y �z, rHq� £ H g Q Q z z M V] O O O «7 FC N .7 HO a F .a .t a H s H � .7 z rC Z 5 Z z 2 .7 r.0 Ep RS .7 a EQ O rn w a �n to 5 v� 0 a .a s W O N m O o m O 0 w 5 0 W z pFp H a a U a U ppE �c E �F+ ppH H o w 7 w p Ep F U u U U U U p H M F F H H N W ZwZ 6 5 H Fa a m m U x x E a a o 0 0 0 0 a 0 P: 0 o 0 a � w w W � � p: U H E O > H P; $ C9 z pp U O U W H U' $ z O q O U O u O q �r.v,,, z [wa, 2 [:, Z [., Z [w� 2 $ qq 4 i N Z v] i v1 O i-7 O .] a O H 'E z H z H z H u z W H H >+ N 0 a z H W z w z w w w w w w w z W � w m w rq i4 n4 o O 5 w w q > w E E a> > H a H> RC 3 RC 3 RC 3 RC 3 RC 3 .L 3> .� Emwwwm l m m V1 to m rn H 4 H d W O u sC r.0 Ul w w i U U to a q q .4 17 ra a .4 0 a /C FC 4 u u a w a .4 a O W m n m O o O o O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m z H q H H z z lD O O 0 0 O 0 0 O n o O U H U H U o O O O O O G O o O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O q H ` Q ❑ ❑ O O O O O O 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z ti z z a �C m w P 0 o o c=. H rG w O o o O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O o o m - In 1 u, N .o rn c0 a 1) 0 In H n u, O o o O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O m r- r m MCI) m m m m o m m m m m m m m m - m m m z fm o 10 m to H m io H O r r O 10 H O to m O ID O 10 H O to H O 10 H ID H 0 ko O 10 .-1 0 1D ko 0 to m 0 to N 0 to n 0 0 m O to to 0 w to 0 kD .-1 0 w m 0 %0 w 0 ID m D r- 0 O Itl In ul il1 O 0 0 0 O O H 0 0 o H 0 0 0 o H o U U q H o H 0 H 0 H 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <f v 0 t0 o a e� 100 a� v H o -T r c� rn x 0 w w a w w a w w a w r.. a r`-4 c a L. u z a a 0 0 0 O O o n U k w .4 w r4 w .4 w W w Y, w P4 w .Y. w 1Yi w 1Yi w �i w a a z z 00 5 z 0 5 5 a a a au a a a a i C W U O W U O W U O W U O q 0 RC W z H W z� H OU U o 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U > W a a > W a > [il a > W a a > W a > r+7 a a a > W a w l4fE �-+ a a a x N [y' w q w q w ❑ w q w q w q m m m m m m m m rn rn a x x p H u F u u a m x m x m x o z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z a 0 a a a a > >> m ai vi vi m m vi w w m' zW a� a m a w z a a a z a° a° a° a x° a a a a a a O > 0 0 0 0 o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O c r[1 =[1 r(l rfl N a <A W z H a +2 a i 2 a H O a°o ° HO HO° HOo arOl HOa "a HO aHO o�"5 mm z 15 O .-I O N -1 N N N I^ N -, N -t N In N to N N m N m N O m .-'1 m " I " I "4 In 10 nt I - d' N r m m I m O H N rt at N N N N N N N N N N N N N -I N N N N N N N N H z z 0 0 ra H H U O O O O O O W F H .-1 H r1 .+ H H H H H .+ H - H H - H H H H H H H H W D7 H E F F F E H ElF H F H H F F El F El F F E E F P H F H F E F K N O m !'1 N m O 1D In V1 O n r1 In O m O O O O O O n d' N O H O ID In N O O In N N O H H m O O V O to O O O O O O O 1- H 1� `lW H In 10 d' 1 i w In O to m l0 m O O m -I h N w O m O I .+ In N O N In N O O O In o O O O N In CD. O -I In i 0 In In a N In H In N eN-1 d' In N N - O 1- In N1 N H In N .-I a 10 0 O �r o 0 H RC �C H H a OH O O L O N IN m a H H a o: m er u O u C.7 O 0 H H z z z H 7Z7..,, i O O O 0 U 0 a W a W a W a W w N as m w w FG U' a cL a W a W a W a •t a u u u u u v] Ir.�� u cn z Ci rz+ m U' O 0 U' Ili uli W z Pa+ z 0 m 0 m 0 m W 1Zi m 0 O 0 0 H 9 u H H In V71 Y+ f�J1 Ul Yi Ya H a W U H W O 5 Z w z m Z m Z w H w H H H H m 6 O x z m z w z w z m C'� W O iG w w AG w w w C O H a 5� O O O 5 gq g m 5] to u H x z z O 2 > O o o m O a a O m m m m m a O aa N> N m m m O m O m rL m In a a a a 0 H 0 H a 3 In O m O m O m O m o z w C] z u u U u u ❑ z a H a H n w E z 3 3 3 3 m H W m W F W H Z O C7 C7 w > W a H Z 3 3 3 3w w 7 u u W > z I� z 12 Z .0 µ1 p W a4 7 U 0 �i w w w m m ¢ Qi u < Ft: -1w w w o I� a r7 .7 H w n 19 w z z z z -r a u u w .l .a a lz a z z z z In W C4 IL DI M C+. m 14 0 CG n r O W 01 01 M M O 0 0 M M O m O 01 M O O O 01 D1 .-a O m N to n fq (3, 01 0 0 0) In 0 0 In m 0 0, QI In O o" 0 m 0 u/ 0 C In �i �i N .--1 O O Iz-1 5 D > ^✓ > > E F H H F F E H F F E E F E N N dH' H q z O z O z O Z O z O z D O U O u O cJ O u O u O u O u O u O u O U O U O u O u O rn m rn rn m rn rn m m rn n H rn In H r� a w w w a o o w H a o O O O O o 0 U U G O O 0 0 0 o O O O to r r r O O o W A O O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m In In In In In T V In In 10 10 10 E- 'I n - z O O n O O 0 G O N O O In O n O O n O O I O M O .-I O rn O m O In O In O In O In O In O a, O m rn O O �-1 10 10 10 w w m 1p 10 10 10 m ID , l0 m w ID 10 10 10 ID I0 10 w 0 0 ID 1D m O G U ti -+ r't O lD n H O n 1D H rt t? In O O O rl m O 1D rl In In In In In In In In In D\ m m 0) of m 01 m In �-F (T m In m In 01 o1 In N I O m r'1 rl rl r1 V' U In In 7 w In n In d' 10 In r In 10 In In v ID I .-1 H t.0 v v 1 o a o " v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N IN N N N N N H N N N IY N N N N N e-1 H H H W W W W W D, PI CL 04 N PI 04 P+ P+ PI W PI 01 M D4 U CJ U U u O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a W W W W H H F a m m In m m H H H o z z z z z z z z z z z z x z z z z z z z z z z z W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W v W u W u W u W u W u W u H H H H H 1 W W 04 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m 2. Z z Z H H Q a s a4 a a a a a a a a w w a a w w a a W H H H H z H M a a a w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m z w z w z w ZzO w z w F E F t O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H H H N 01 z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z A z z z z z a a m a o W 0 W Cl) W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 w 0 w 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 H yO� BOG 2 OX 2 BOG O 5 5 O Z omo a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a O d m �C � w w w �z o 0 m In m m m In rn O N 0 H O 0 r-1 O 0 H O 0 H 0 H 0 H O 0 H O 0 e-1 0t� H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 H O 0 .-1 O 0 .-1 O O In o O H 0 O H 0 O Hx 0 O 0 O 0 In 0 0 In In u H O O O I0In O r0r�� O O O va In w In In In InaO .X-I H O O O ri RC U a a a a a a a O a O a O a O a O a O s O P; O P4 O a O a O a O a sC m m m 4 m 2 m m W MEOW W W N m IfJ n m tT o H 1D n m N m a m n m m d' c4 N eF d' � � 4l T N N N If1 1f1 Vl Ill Ifl 1[l tl1 N H c 0 N H fJ .+ x O o 0 0 .+ H H H - ..a H o O (4 H H rl H H H H H m H H H E E H E F E H H H F E F F E E F EJ M N I'1 O I[1 N r Ifl rn lD O m I[t I[1 M Ifl Ifl O m N In 1D O [1 E. O r1 O N h I[1 H 1D d' O m n n rl Pl m Eji ul In O In In m Ift In �r r n In <r 1D N o v m H W a f 1D O Ifl N H O O In I4 m In In a4 O 9 m tt o U Wm 3 � F w t�iJ H o H o N C4 F o 0 E 0 w x w z .a a Id a -C P. z d u r!; z c9 FC O FC E Ela a a a P+ w w a OH pHp N m pHo a O pFO F w pFo E m a til toil O ti1 vo i v i t0» 04 ppH H F F E H P a U aar�� x m m o m a w a zW a�.77 a�77 aWW aW sW a a W 0 Iz-I O F 0 r-a A Iwo Iw-I .w+ Iw+ 0 a 4 W �x�yy F W H � H � H H H H W O A w a > W rC W W U W W W W q a O U U U U U U a i [9 m H O P: Ihii o 0, In a M 10 H O rl I z W 0 H m O m m m m O O of N N H lD H h H m m H H m .--I N H ICl 1!t r z Z H r r O m N m O N N N ( N N N N N N N N Z m N t'1 O O N n N " r N N h M r - n H O H O H O H O H H O O I 0 0 O H O H O a tT Q r1 H H .-� I[1 If1 I[1 V1 ILl N CJ N N N N N N N N O � x a � a w w m x I o o w F [Y� O 10 N 10 f'1 O O d 10 H H H H lD H N H H O W d' H to m 0 O O O H H O 1p 1D In 1D m O O 10 �D m lD 0m 01D 0m m m O O+ H In M r'1 n O O .n D1 o mm m O r� M rn 0) `z. O iD N ID O m f't 10 O n O h M 1D O 0 lD O r O 10 O 1D O n O O 1D lD O lD O n O n O r N uO I fJ H r1 rl r1 r1 r1 Nl O r'1 M t+l N O to Vl ID V1 If1 1[1 O O O Ifl Ifl Vl 1f1 LLl Ifl I[1 IfJ If1 I!J O U r.0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O x u W U Z U H lz U z H U z H u u z z H H U z H U z .-1 U U U z z z H H H U z . O a w u `a 3HO z Z W w a wWvv Z ICFuWCE u U H�OWWx-I HH�0.I H0 E30 HOO az a O U� qmnW WonmHO o CY w rq� H W 04 7 a 5 `x H�xJ �H.I 7 S Hx�J S a q w x O m o m O O m W O W O W O O o m W W O W O co W c z WW W m W co 0 W 0 W W 0 0 m 0 o r r r h r n r r n n O O a ID o Ill o H o O O H H H H H O O O O O O O O O O H O:+ UP u H O U W O In H W I-+ YI O (n£ O O QQ O In O U O O a O O a O O O o a O O O a O O 5 O O O O 5 a a O O O O a O O 5 ��...yyy O 027 Fc u W W W W m W W W m W W W W W W m m W W W W W 17 O O H N O •'1 �9' Ilt iD H N , , g O O 0 0 • z .-� .-� H N N N N N N o v W d a P�0 H E F F H F F E E H E n F F 1 F O E o E o N 7+ N r m Q1 m N m N � � vi r in r 1f1 ID O O .� �(1 N m O r� N O o t a)W N w m N ID N m r Cl) V � N � N o O N m ID Ol m Z Fe F r z H a pp m pHp a m FE. `2 8 Fz Hn Q op m w c m pH ua p W w a ca > a co 0 co a s H Q E a N 0 H U to> H a ia.7 Q a s g Q a 0 a s A F w o w H O A Iw.l o w a w O m o> p> U w ',> a4 o� W U M z CL 5 W H W V1 U H H m m c� � a 0)� a. r N O H It U O H W Ci (] H W 10 N ol O O O N I'1 00 H N O N H �O co�D N Itt i ,D O H N .-� m r V' O O f'1 � Ol N O 00 Ill N a V a tt//J� C H z O W m Ol O a• of O V' Ol Ol C1 a' a a m w m 0 o a o w O H a O O p H O O O 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 O 0 o com r�i m ID lD O o O 0 0 0 pq z o rn 0 In 0 In lD m D °` iD o 0 0 In 0 0 o r� 0 o 01 o 10 H ro •J O �p r Ill lD rl Ifl tD r1 Ul NI Ill H O N O 0 N O N Ill Ill Ifl r'1 Ifl r1 Ifl r'1 � M 'i /'1 .--I N N O H o O O U z H U z H U z U U U U rl UU t�1 ROC [��..71 co w �t�Hy'!� H U) H rn U RC F U Rt �Fj in V O H U H (A (O(]] W U HC. W U a H [W[yy W �W�--II O O P w F INS U 0 H a ad w as w z o EH., WW H WW H w H a z H o Wx �a o N w m a a w a w a o z z z H H w w O a .7 C] J m H a vi H a 04 z N z E ul Cy cy F F p�Cy H F 7 p H p+ [ �+ 5 Fq t 5 m �y wU z wj o 0 0 0 n o 0 0 n 0 Ill 0 ll1 0 O 0 O 0 HO 0 o 0 _ O 0 O 0 0 H 0 0 O 0 a p� 0 s pl 0 Rt F 0 RC F 0 0 RC Rt F E+ vl v] 0 RC H O 0 a E N aa 7 O O E. O E H E 5� �^( 2 U y � O O h 18 7, O .. In �p . �p r ip m �p . �D o r .-I 0 0 z N N N N N N N + H p x U E. 4 O O O O O Cw 7 a<C w 07 F E H E F F H H F H H H F E. E. E H H F H N M m M O In r m m ID N m O O� O O I0 a1' O O M C� m N If1 �O r p EI F z 5 1p N N m m I m .-1 r N M N r M H N .-1 N r ID 10 V' m �p m H d' w 1!1 M m N m M1 Ill r m H O Il) I/t ]' N M m v m m a O N O m m O I[1 m H O Ill O M M m V 01 N M1 r r N H N d' r W Q d a W O H F E v1 H H U H F W H IU-I p W H to W to W m W vJ W to W rn W U1 W to W to W v] W vl W a O to w x w O x a O W x O 0 x O al W a H O <C x O w x x 0 u > "LH x y H a H 01 H a H a H a H a H a H a H a H a H a Q z H a Q U w Q z W Q w x U Q z An O H a Q U z 0 z U Q z H o � � m � m� z > > o EEC fH-1 �a a If) w In VI W N n v] n N N n n W n W In N P1 Q U W Q x m I 0 m m - V' m w m H m N <t o H d' m N O m r m I r N o n m m O W N VOjj m �0 m fmn 10 lmn O m Itln� l0 m O - N N l0 ul m O N m O H Q z H O H O O O O O O O O O 0 Ill H O M m H V ID 0 r H a w w In a I o o w E x w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v r v o 0 m m o 00 0 o 0 r v M o w zH O o H 0 H 0 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H 0 H o H n Ill n 0 H n m o M 0 M 0 H n l/l m M z O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 010 � O 0 O r p r In ID O ID O r H H H H H H n O Q In In O In In In IH [1 In In In In In In In It vt N O N- In 0 N ul M vl H Q,' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U z H M 0 U] F u1 F u1 H N F N H to F v] F rq H m F u) F U] F U H z H U o to U z H U z H 0 W z 0 In u 7 u 5 u � u 5 u J u � u n u a u � u 5 u 5 a U u� H z m ua o 0 0 0 0 °o o Qo o Qo Qo Qo a 0 z o �a u I M x x W x 01 x W x M x 01 a w x N x 01 x 01 x 01 o x w I4 a p H o to O W E 114 z W u W u W u W u W u W u W u W U W U W u w u z r.0 U W O H H O O <C a x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IW�]] OQ 0 F o °' a QO [n to m U] V] fn rn UJ 01 Ui <i a o .] +w a`� [[atea H x m z 5 0 0 tD 0> 0 5 0 a 5> > > x w 3 3 3 3 w 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O In O In r o H O 1f1 o H 0 H 0 N 0 H 0 H Q }I U E U H .-1 O to O [n .--I O V] .-1 O to H O V] '-I O m O U] H O m H O m H O til H O V1 O 1l- 6 O 7�- O x W O a W O I l- <C O 1� O N O 1-] 1-'I O //� <C u o 5 5 0 5 > > , 3 3 3 ~.r 9 �9 r � � r E+ Oa 0 0 iv H in W H El a N O D O O N � O w rl 0 rl m lo lo N M � o O H CZ E E v1 E+ P' Z w a a x w as H O O 0 z U n z w > a a o w w � Wn o °i 0 r ti r H Ca H z rn 9 H o a S w w w a 0 o o T. W � � m m z o ID 0 ID O D n O U U a H O � O W U U z H H 7 a O W U V% O z U H W a z H W H U O � H W CY a 0 a 0 �PZ a w o r > o0 00 O U E o O 4 u 030 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:47AM 01/07/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39704 01/07/00 LEA027 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 39705 01/07/00 STE070 STEWART ESCROW 39706 01/07/00 WIS020 WISE MAINTENANCE & CONST CHECK TOTAL 25.00 19200.00 16315.00 35,540.00 031 21 O Z p o 0 p o 0 ra o N -a � O � 0 0 0 p p G ro m o •� H H a a H H O E+ E, P\4 CL� E+ n c P4 W-Ji [a W U: O z � o Z z G1 z o � -t N a w H a3 2e2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 4:05PM 01/06/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39693 01/06/00 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 1148.15 39694 01/06/00 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 511.13 39695 01/06/00 ECO200 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT 150.00 39696 01/06/00 IMP015 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 400.00 39697 01/06/00 INT005 INTERNAL REVENUE SVC-ACS 200.00 39698 01/06/00 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 390.00 39699 01/06/00 PRI050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 40395.60 39700 01/06/00' RIV040 RIV CNTY DISTRICT ATTORNY 426.50 39701 01/06/00 SUP100 SUPPORT PAYMENT CLEARING- 150.00 39702 01/06/00 TRA030 TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE 52.88 39703 01/06/00 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 132.00 CHECK TOTAL 43,956.26 033 23 z O O 0 x o u rn rn rnI m m \ W E., a+ rn rn rn 0)p m z H H E+ H E+ 04 a a a z z z z z U N U7 7 p ^ f] O O O p cj p O C Z p W o O lO a -.i L3 O m N s. 0 ° w N co p � O O 01 O N C rt1 to v 7 J C G C i,l �4 c m u 5 z r a a z w \ a a a a a i[.aj H p O U I In Q \ U O _ O o ID O LD O O O O U O O n U O o O O \ O W O N p N p N p N O N H .] H Ul O O O O O p C, O O O ❑H ^W w �1 O O O O C a ll 0 0 0 a or w � - m o 2 Ul C a O H U p H � m m a w o a o o a o a o o> o m o ❑ lD H 1D CZ ID ai o 1D If, o , p o , 0 0fn 3 o U H O F H > z z c� z c� a C, (J w ai 2 � w O Q w p . H n 4 � r4 y W �a., a n n H n u no W n x w z ❑ D, Hi a E- a a w a w z a H a n y h > a a W T. z It H a Z .-1 z H H a ai a m a wO a o 0 0 � U v O a 1 O c, ct C O O F. 7 .�i� �>i j 2 .0 U -imm 034 24 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:39PM 01/04/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 39660 01/04/00 ABE001 JAQUES ABELS 75.00 39661 01/04/00 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 39662 01/04/00 BLA060 JAN BLAKELY 50.00 39663 01/04/00 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 39664 01/04/00 BUI041 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOC 29.00 39665 01/04/00 BUL100 JAMES BULGRIN 50.00 39666 01/04/00 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 75.00 39667 01/04/00 CAL080 CA SOC MUNCIPAL FINANCE 225.00 39668 01/04/00 CAS200 CASUELAS CAFE 686.53 39669 01/04/00 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 39670 01/04/00 DAV010 MIKE DAVIS 50.00 39671 01/04/00 DES005 DESERT BEAUTIFUL 15.00 39672 01/04/00 GTE010 GTE CALIFORNIA 61.88 39673 01/04/00 'HEN050 TERRY HENDERSON 38.68 39674 01/04/00 HUL010 KATHRYN HULL 50.00 39675 01/04/00 IMP015 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 400.00 39676 01/04/00 IRWO10 JOSEPH IRWIN 50.00 39677 01/04/00 KIR010 TOM KIRK 75.00 39678 01/04/00 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 39679 01/04/00 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 39680 01/04/00 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 39681 01/04/00 PED010 KATHRYN PEDERSEN-NADLER 50.00 39682 01/04/00 RAS060 JACKIE RASMUSSEN 50.00 39683 01/04/00 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 39684 01/04/00 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 39685 01/04/00 REY055 FRANK R. REYNOLDS P.E. 50.00 39686 01/04/00 RJT010 RJT HOMES, LLC 16138.22 39687 01/04/00 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 75.00 39688 01/04/00 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 39689 01/04/00 SOU002 SOUL OF CHINA 265.85 39690 01/04/00 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 39691 01/04/00 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 75.00 39692 01/04/00 WEL025 WELLS FARGO BANKCARD 177.40 CHECK TOTAL 19,312.56 035 25 O O Z -S O O W a E+ E E i i E i H H E E E i E E [�. w 0 m ElH El E 1 o 0 0 N E-I T[a7- 0 E 1 O �11 0 U O 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O C. 0 O 0 O 1 10 O O O O O N •t a O q. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 ID 0 O o 0 r U' lf) U' z 0 W UU 0 0 Ut 0 rn N a 0 In 0 0 0 iri r W 0 ui Z N a t Ln '0 'D w U o 0 mil. 0 0 z z y q0 Z 0 E Oa W WQ H ZS j 4 F E H N � h Epp > .7C pHp pEp pHG � H RC OUP pHO W pFp FW E z of E E 0 pE H H U H z El 0 H 0n a0 � p p7 tz z 0 H a 00 z � P4 0 O❑ x O O U a U O [ % U 0n E %o Z 8 z W H o > n > Fa ❑ w a ❑ > > rzJ > > � tZ > w > u Q E > u u w �a u m w w u w a u u x w H a ❑ 0 p a m m m m m rn m rn ❑ H n H z H 0 u z w n u w n U w ❑ u w ❑ U w n u w n u w ❑ U w ❑ z a a w w m % 0 o w H pL O o C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 z rn 0 rn 0 m 0 rn o r O rn o m o r n o o r m 0 rn o r- n to �-I O o U O to r J N O d' O H �1 .� O 7 itt ti O N O •1' �G1 N O .-1 rl N 'i O r-i O ri O rl O O O O O O U O W U z O O � H W ❑ a w z w+ o z w co w � w t° o o � o w � ❑ a< o oa w vwi Eo z 0 > .+ 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o in 36 U � H o O C ID O m o .i O o O VQ O o N o O 0 O rC U w as w ao u u u n n 26 d. n ip rn r O t�J m O -� U 0 0 u -t 0 \ N i. EiW o W E Wi F ri�zl �iW rEW7 rid WiW WWi WiW F �iW7 E �iW7 H F H H H H F H w w u, 0 „ m m m o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 o O O O o P. �h o m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a z z� 0 0 0 0 0 a cl Epp z Hpp OH HHo qo RC Elo EE q0 2 > Epo' Co 9 z pp, Z pEp pFa; U E H E pFo pHo F H H H pHO H aHa E d E ul W E E. F q H 4 H z H E w w w a a s a > a 0 a a s o o a a oPio u - a rzj a a o o a o z o`�o0 z H a❑ o ` `2> W0>� , W> > 1> � > U > a n� w � rn rn c u rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn F=1 q 7 H fn rn ui U 04 U U U U U U U U r L7 ul Vl U W ❑ W ❑ W ❑ W ❑ W O W ❑ W ❑ W O q H z ¢ z a a w w as a 0 o w E w o o 0 o o o n o o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o w ¢� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f rn o rn 0 0 0 m 0 0 o m 0 rn 0 rn 0 o 0 0 o ID 0 N l0 r-1 Cl .-1 r1 rl fi r-i O c O O O H m a n W a z 0 z o o f ❑ z a a l'zda rn x w �a EEn a a f��i P4 0 [il z x 3 04 U W EA[�+. a z w a H P+ w w N a a u a a w w m a a H z 0 a w a. ¢ u w i Ex OO o�p a z u H C H E u E h n oo O o u o O o o o o 037 r0] 0 0op,1 o oog O .--1 o l0 `0 0 27 lD 0 N M d' 1n 1p r w rn o .-' N 10 r r N p O U O M x 0 O W C [at7 H F H F F E F H H H F E F H E F H H H H H W w 0 o O o er o m o m o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n o 0 0 0 0 o O O C9 o G] z O O lD N O ul N N O ti N W 1D .00 �n O 1n O .i :J 1n 1n lO N N N m 2) r 1 1 d' N N r 1n 1n �. () 0 0 "1' 1 10 C- 0 O N l0 N rn d' N N a O O O N O 0 1n O 6 O N O O m O O O m n O n 1n t9 Z 1n W w 1n N H tR El m EA O to F to H m H in El to El to El wm El H to E to F 1n H M � r z z .n 1D N U Hz w a a o a a n w w a n a w a w H a U a N C9 z U z CD z u U z z C9 z U z u z t7 z 0 z u z 0 z 0 z U z 0 z a £ U a a U z F E F n❑ n❑ u g o o❑ n q n❑❑❑ H �F^y 9 9 9 U H E4 a H O 5 5 O 5 5 5 5 5 O 5 5 O 5 O s ❑ x F 1 L.l L.l t' ❑ q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ rya ❑ ❑ H ❑ z H m W W x W O 5 O a 5 O O 5 W zHz Z aW W F W z E, o > a u> a w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w>> w �a > t� U 7, W R: fZ W a a a a a C /L P4 C. P4 W U U U .a w v w ❑ U ? a G7 m cr, rn rn m m rn rn to rn rn H n M U U u U U H z W W W W w o n n ❑ ❑ ❑ as a z a c, m w w 0 O O C4 Fa a. O O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O 0 •-1 O O O O O 0 O O O o O 0 0 O O O 0 o 0 o M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] z rn O rn O m rn M N o (n IN H . " M N 1n 1n O I o d o d o d o V o I o c rn O rn O r M to O V' d' -P d' 1n 1n l0 1n F 2 q O 0 O O O 0 U O O 0 O O O O O O O O U o O 0 O 0 O O O O U O O O O Vl _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 O 0 U U IN M -.r 1n io .� .. .y o r+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �n in 1n 1n in u, 1n o 0 0 0 W P. En C� RC ❑ a u z U a u a U a U U a a U a U a u a U a u a U a U a u a U a U a m m O Hn a CQ x W E a z W a4 wmm U7 rA v1 U] r/] v] v� m tq U1 twwO v] v1 v] m OR U £ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 o a > C9 0 EH rH El rP �Fnj rHy rPy Py El yE El v� 0 U Y) a to w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O � r 0 O� x O O O F K u cG a a rz a a a a x a x s a x a a a a m to m 28 C) N z 0 0 0 0 � x o w E F a a o 0 � r Q; 0 0 0 o �n r- �n r- r U z H Hpp ii p�p Ell, E w H U H z Q z o z a W w C1 W � ❑ x iD � m o � rn m H e W rJ z a w w w ac OO w E a o 0 o 0 rn r z o n � O U O d U a a o u z .r; 5 0 a; F C9 a z OQ H w IC4 o w fn �s 0 o N O U U H � a I 039 29 A/P-,AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED CITY OF -LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME 39240 DEF 11/30/99 107.75 GER050 GERALDINES COSTUMES TOTAI, VOIDED 107.75 4:30PM 01/05/00 PAGE 1 INVOICE DESCRIPTION SANTA SUIT RENTAL 040 �J A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 4:19PM 01/05/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION 39112 DEF 10/18/99 50.00 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF MEMBERSHIP/B WILSON TOTAL VOIDED 50.00 041 31 /P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 2:53PM 01/05/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR INVOICE NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 38332 DEF 09/03/99 1200.00 RIV100 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS FORECLOSURE/COHEN 774171013 TOTAL VOIDED 1,200.00 04< 32- T4ty,-, 4 XP Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: d" ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report PUBLIC HEARING: as of November 30, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated November 30, 1999 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. Res,6e4tfully sub Anitod: ohn M. Falconbr, Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 043 TW�r 4 a4P Q" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for November 30, 1999 DATE: January 4, 2000 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending November 30, 1999. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment ;Cash (1) LA1 F US Treasuries (2) US Gov't Agencies (2) Commercial Paper ;Mutual Funds ..Total inninq I Purchased I Sold/Matured $1,141,418 0 11,1 E19,999 0 300,000 14,052,692 11,030,324 7,000,000 17,628,448 0 0 0 0 0 9,020,698 0 3,896,469 $53,033,255.1 $11_,030,324 --1 _ _ $1.1,196,469 Other Ending 596,579 Change ($544,839) ($544,839) 10,889,999 j (300,000) (15,037) 18,067,979 4,015,287 42,138 17,670,586 42,138 0 5,124,229 (3,896,469) ($517,738) $52,349,372 ($683,883) I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and ins in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Footnote (1) The amount reported in the other column represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury and Agency investments. 044 o 9 9 W Z Z Zz Z 2 C 1A 9p O A U a U. U. C a O N O � •� � R Eu a N N u N r N N N O N C 8 girl a s > pO .�� LL E>N `$f 4; $ ac�iN 40 G � v v Z c w 9 iD c aR N vetO oe ae fn aR ago aR t$ aR n Ln ci g Z &' E n oe c4i ML2 N g 7 7 LL 2 aR apR O Y N ''' Z O N 01 O u Q Q O M w E 7 �gQ R W 1i W $ a� � 9I Y T v U EUy�p,z^m LL= I „ ui p 9 O cZLL ?, ul `7 uu V C N Y co C9 W pg LL «yC S d C in � yj •ii � %� C �RQ$ mY ` v �o 01 Z r m v 3 Z ui yE• o ��"cpi 'g Laid o LL a W.� .E'3 m rV•l� Cmm p updEli�c a a� u , E C Wq °mw ZuZo —10�� =�° E �wE 15E S ME3rx r 00WW000 v p 'p 8 a U U > :j— a �w o aeoeo N w 1nN E E N N c _c' C N V N Ugin a _ � aiE<� r$Zm g°g'g'N UWm m w WW� 045 N N N F C: 0 aaaln ;� n YFC A RR 7 046 ILL O r 0 s m Q ao v N CD Dr--0-0;u D oCD N n 0 vNi •• s .. amCD- -0a, a 32ma c�D ca C a) a; v 0 C cn CD CD CL 0 40 N V O f29, �—"� cnC-n W�4-10� O W WO W C~J1�OWN COD C"D cn _ 0 0 -n m M 0 3 D �c 3 CL U) zz < ch 0 U) 0 0 CD CD ca G' o 3 CL _ a cc s cn cn CD tncn� a) CD m CO � ,z ,� 0 0 C/)(D 0 0 0)cnzZ--< 0 0 c° CD cD �w �cDoo taw worn C coo0W000O 00 IV 00 0o' � CWo OGNOO OCDa ..L W � � zooZzZa 0 Dl cD cD Co CD CD cD a 000 0000 a1 H -♦Kccc5;�c�zF cncncn a -TCD 3 M y BCD -nm @ ;oo0 3 CD cc D�� CD ML c h N : Zzz < _ U) CP-PCDD CD CCDD (a :r U) = cD a d H CD a c c c ? in cn cn CD ccncn,r vmmmC,DCD —vvwmm � C c a 90 C 00 °o CD aa)i zZZ--< 0 0.0 mCDCCD ca v+ T 4:6 T o WOOCOODN0000 (OCOw W Nam. •wPCCA N W Cb W — O O O Z Z Z Z 0 0 o D< < < DDDCD CO CD CD CD co CD m co Co O C k ZCbrnoZZZ='a 'cD �rncn0 ; D000DDD 00o d cD a c CD 00 Zoo-.&zzz -n DN►�►�DDD� d 0 O O 0 O O a z0cn0 C< 3'Z 3��o m m�Qv < o p cD = o0 < 7. cD 3 cD `O cD CA CD CD D (D �* :3 FD n co m v ca D 0 Iz 047 gx ofa x �$ � ss g g g ?$o �bi000bi gb:obi s a s a g�$o gg$000 giAog pp� pp8«,R :o fV N bi B s Ji zoo+> {`YyY' R°'nlY rv� QQ Q 4 6 qq S Y a u 0 r a 3 r > N > gg000R �iA$RbiLibi a s ja 3 N g�000g g�RiiRAR'ii � 4 0 0 lgN='N V N am N f0 i N m a8 N N C � y C E A N C > C as r LL 0 O m rn A U U a ar C V G O u I'� O� O ILLLL 7 _ J d 7 C LL Z oaw �_ x y aE- '�' N O h N N 0 7 lOZ G U,;U' 0U0 c _ appp QD� OOf7N fI�7000�NOO:O aa�O �44 `Cp+p�f�Ml O N N O aV NhP1 aD �" .r,.�1C9 N N N pppp NmaOcp Q�"Nh N V GOm r OO1^ i kn r. ob M O a N N r'rv� C U. N b LL Z C LLmLLy Y c 00 3 LL EE C C O C C > > LL c y C c= LL N y J d Oy LL Muv; �. m m aO1'� v �' v �_os_'n CLm ; 15UQ_W.5F--.N X. . N ri aopp avpp n�pp n�O�OaD 933 C E g g aEi a 40��?�? c�lo :Nli Ni� OMN� r M I O l' n r N N l' ��pp�r t0�� P'1h 01 ODD j Of l'7I mI. N r M 'o Of 'Ccq Q.i 0tOp Olt�,Qt 0co QI m N r- r N '� Or ^I^ to N ��pp uOhap0! f� aOpp�hp�, to - N N NC'i r V Q N N c. 2 it�j h N �"n: N O. n! 4 to—,: ... r O' W �. �.,,I a� Opf Epp �y•�O z1 cq�c+pp�aOoop�NN10 �aa0pp Clo UI Na0 ah0 {N H1 yyI N ip h_ 01 �1l1 N O h M LL''1Y]]� p 0 r ' yy P'00 r- w aao aa Of E m - m N oNpppp 00 O `ONNN Ol N I ')_ .�Oi �pO�j�OOW �V Ih 00�t a0 v1 wmiO� ,tip , Y N � yI �p �jC,OOD m �'N O N 00 ((yy pp v? m W M O1 h OIN N m O P.r �,�0 �ON m S.�NONN cn� mnc�f h 1ci In 'So I'3� I I ' 'f I M'. INS r to O N!-W R R O — Q~1 4 N' o w .11OD CD 0) NIN � I00 C m 0) to r "IP-013�- : a W) th to 1 Al W) OtV N Cf IM. Goou3ito_i0�" ';NOmW)M' N M) '0' �- N �OI t0 iON I OI CW OO R(M', CO MO O) I N CO h CD h CO Iti A$m 1"Y09_M{CVl co co OCCCC 10 O O d N h CV Oi00 C'� O p 01 a� COO O �j N 00 v v M n tD n U. uM') N aMO�� v r` N ri P N IN a N N I o r` O O mIN np T N a o O/p)Na N' O Co rll CDo O N CD,�, ct OM O rIh0Ccnco o to MO to O NIt N N 00 L. - N 'f ici NtV dO�, t700'm r` N'DCl) m I'O�tV'; O M O 00, < N C4 O to O C O Q) Lc)_ diO4 (n'. H')O0N, th t000~0N pap C�c) V h O.M rO COfN�r^ Mr-O)m Nh f N cc N C pp W N co r talc). MOO co CNO r-u�C4to coo-0 V) A Y O CO O Alotn' r-rnunaa 000ONMa�h pap t0 N CO W IN.M 00 O h C7 Co O tall O M n M A O'N'a' N N m m .v-- O) tD O Cl) m O M oo M of to to Ito a O �d.. Olg �OOOpow, r-- cnLn ' Y1'O Q n O N tD M I� � O CO O Cp 0 l O CA O O O Ob M N O N cc M n N O N Ii N N OOi'pMl CD CV co lm Crj �f p) O p'. G Y M n•-Oaf M .a- M ct - I ao .- ai v M c ' Grr IM p e U. in Ni y'i Q)'M) 11 NLOCOO may) Ih O b CD CNfiO Cp:� 0 IN U N V N N Cl) O O cli mr M CO N O 0 0 NI p~D' h pAD 0. CM. uiNN CD C)—CAN WI bl IN .CIO) N, t+):tff' htO tANwl v )O V co CO 1 UO,M; Lnl` µ ( 000000 CND —co 0) OCV r-- o tO N O N r` ��N O N eM- N CDr rt` OOtD � cn Y�r� a cc j I i Ntr- N H C v Fes- y L) tp m C (T) c N y m tr c ` ' m . H U A' x X' C 1p r-✓i U C C Y! O O J CI ca O X; >. C t0 01 OQ a 0 •Z N X a I y > N I U ac 05 .I TNM' O) 00)) > 2 m 0 d V p)= a.�I lyl t C' vL)LL m 2 d ar-tn0�_ X N Cp wtna0U0�i_zU O _ w1 Co CO Co O O rl r n N N fM C'7 CD JCOo O O `N IN N wi I �� C O p NO CO r r- o00 � I I I I � C I O 0 IL _ W Ui LL tl Li t U U ci I O CU I O O N 41y di b 0 R Z2I « N CI N N C j d > N '.l C .0 a p) � CU U O l7) C g � O N 47 %0 O h O O w M N M, N m N O Ito O � <o N O N N N 0 pi M N � N Y N OI r� V of v y' 050 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CITY RDA RDA FA BALANCE SHEET 1113 199 FIXED LONG TERM FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH 3,868,088.28 6,070,262.13 ( 24) 9 ,937,356.17 LQRP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 705,000.00 705.000 00 INVESTMENT T-BILUNOTES 8 OTHER 28,000,000.00 25,000,0W,00 AUTO MALL CASH 781,556.40 781.556 49 LORP CASH 61,665.48 61,666AII BOND REDEMPTION CASH 396,111.90 28.73 396.140.63 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 14,008,544.14 590.543.79 14,679.087 A3 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH --_ 1,000.00_. __. _._.._—.y _ _ _ 1,000.00 CASH L INVESTMENT TOTAL 30,050,644.77 21,321,583.05 _ _ _ _ 589.678 26 62,561$06 70 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 47,154.46 50.900.00 8,260,000.00 8.368.054.46 PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (264,217.28) 41,783.03 (212A34 25) LORP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 48.760.68 48.760.64 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1,373.83 1.373.63 LOANINOTES RECEIVABLE 25.841.74 2,668,850.80 2.694.692.64 DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES 127,984.00 127,964.00 DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS 785,357.14 741,556.90 1,527,014.04 DUE FROM RDA 6,890,277.20 6.890.277 20 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA 1,384,175.34 1,384,175.34 ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS 434.951.70 434.951.70 NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE 1,986.88 1.988 86 ACCRUED REVENUE 833.40 833.40 TRAVEL ADVANCES 1.860.00 1,860 00 EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES _ 80,900.00 . _ _ _ 60,300.00 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 9.507.024.79 3.562.784.01 8,260,000.00 21,329 809 60 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT 37.637.00 37.637.00 RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 7500 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 2A0000 DEPOSITS TOTAL 39,812.00 39,812 00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 1.289.894.28 15,148,622.00 10,233,506.05 26.669,722 33 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (585.360.27) (565.360 27) AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE LIT DEBT 3,395,117.03 3.395,117,03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR L7T DEBT 1 677 482_02_ 94.828�721_06 8,260,000 00 104,768.203 06 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 704,334.01 16,146,522.00 1,677,482.02 10.233,5W.05 98,223,830.09 8,260.000 00 134.245.682.17 TOTAL ASSETS_40;801,$i``^Z_.,],I`.146.522.00.__7�7T�g2.0214.$$•�.3�4.:_14. 10 3,540,Q _04113.$3D9�. QJ$49.576.2.4_ 8,2$9.00000 208,177,11047 LIABILITY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 7,680,84 11,999.44 DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 622,190.29 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 675.00 1,517,134.04 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY ACCRUED EXPENSES PAYROLL LIABILITIES 61.701.81 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 4,851.66 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 21.740.00 SUSPENSE 129,128.01 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA PAYABLES TOTAL 747,648.40 11,999.44 1.517.134.04 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS 198.00 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES DEPOSITS 423.107.00 LORP DEPOSITS 15.364.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 1.130.484.59 MISC. DEPOSITS 329.780.95 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 800 668.11 TOTAL DEPOSITS 2.684.198.65 15.364.00 DEFERRED REVENUE _ __ __ 8270.887 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 8.270.87 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 337.880.86 DUE TO THE CRY OF LA QUINTA 1,327,801.72 QUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 1.865.442.58 TOTAL LIABILITY EQUITY4UND BALANCE 3,440,117.72 1,871,482.02 1,532,498.04 19.660.28 522,190 29 9,305.00 1527.01404 61,701 81 4.66165 21.740.00 129.128.81 9.305.00 2.286.066 88 198.00 423.107.00 15.364.00 1.130,464, 59 329.760.95 11MA 8.11 2,894582 65 8,280,000.00 8,2611 270 67 - -- -- - 8,200,000.00 8.268.27067 337.880.86 8.274.452.34 9.602.054 06 12,408,237.00 12,468,237.00 10.068.148.75 10,068,148.73 67 � 15 000_00 _. (504.08) k260.000 00 75.674.495.92 - — - 90,223,830.09 (504.08) 8,260.000 OU 108.148.816.59 94.223.838.09 8,268,800.92 8,250.WO 00 121.402.736 79 37,481,697.65 15,146,522.00 23,351,870.42 10,233,500.05 580.777.36 66.774.373 68 TOTAL 41A61LITY i EQUITY 1a.Q01A15,5T 15.140.UZ,Q0 _ 1.077.46Z02 _24.004,304 40 10.273_Q00_0i Q6.22�.Q3Q:Q9_: Q,Q4Y.570 :Q- Q.100.000 UU 2U8,177.110 41 Woo)(O.00j 00) (0 00) � CASH i INVESTMENTITOTAL 62,661,906.70 PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (Y12d3.4.20) ld 4J TOTAL 52,349,372,48 01� Tjht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for STUDY SESSION: the Public Works Director/City Engineer and the Senior Engineer to Attend the League of California PUBLIC HEARING: Cities, Public Works Officers Institute in San Diego, California on March 8 , 2000 through March 10, 2000 Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer and the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute (Attachment 1) presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 8, 2000 through March 10, 2000. This seminar, along with overnight and travel reimbursement expenses, will be funded for the Public Works Director/City Engineer through Public Works Administration Travel and Training, Account No. 101-451-637-000. The approved fiscal year 1999/2000 budget identifies $900 for this conference. The Senior Engineer will be funded through Public Works Development & Traffic Travel and Training, Account No. 101-452-637-000. The approved fiscal year 1999/2000 budget identifies $900 for this conference. The estimated expenditures for this seminar are as follows: ► Seminar Enrollment $280 x 2 = $ 560.00 ► Overnight Lodging $300 x 2 = $ 600.00 ► Meals $100 x 2 = $ 200.00 ► Mileage Reimbursement $100 x 2 = $ 200.00 Total $1,560.00 The estimated cost per person to attend the Institute is $780; and, as noted above, sufficient funds have been budgeted and are available. None. 052- T: \P W DEPT \COUNCIL\2000\0001 18b. wpd This three-day seminar conducted by the League of California Cities, Public Works Officers Institute educates Public Works Directors, Assistant Public Works Directors, City Engineers, and Chief Assistants on a number of issues facing Public Works Departments throughout the State. The Public Works Officers Institute is for public works professionals and provides an opportunity to learn about the latest developments in the public works field. Topics typically include issues related to managing transportation, infrastructure, water, and waste programs and services. This seminar also provides the opportunity to interact with other city Public Works Officials to discuss items of common interest. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer and the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 8, 2000 through March 10, 2000; or 2. Do not approve authorization for overnight travel for the Public Works Director/City Engineer and the Senior Engineer to attend a three-day Public Works Officers Institute presented by the League of California Cities in the City of San Diego, California on March 8, 2000 through March 10, 2000; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, v` l Chris A. Vo Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: PRO Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Q Attachments: 1. Public Works Officers Institute Flyer 002 T: \P W DEMCOUNCIU2000\0001 I $ b. wpd JAN-10-00 MOO 16:12 OF CA CITIES FAX NO, 9186588240 P. 01 . . a a 0 v a 0 6 It 10 140OKnRm SKKWWO, CA%814 916 658,82W ATTACHMENT 1 PUBLIC WORKS OF,F410ERS INSTITUTE Wvd*exJV-.FW*, March &- 10, 2000 Paradus Point Romd, Saw Viejo YoWN Wat so'Attend It You Are A. .. • Public Works Director • Assistant Public Vodw Diteaox *City Ragowt 4 Chief Assistant Attend This Institute and team the Latest About... • BmWwg lep4stive and adnumstvative support lot restoring �thforaWs infrastrocum • Eubsocing vdations with your mayor and council inembers' • lm+roving the partnership with Caltriss regional Offms 9 Using humor to b4httn dw wotkykce environment *Titflk cAo*W,,Gft* vt%fFvwwWm. consultant sekctioa,:wd other public wodo issues 0 Finscciq pubkc watka project; after Psoposition Z 8 Us Institute offas a v*m oppcwtmdty to discuss topics Such a stdON9, orpWadom muctwo, and local goals with yew CA00s Regional Director. Thess regiond bmakow smioits an designed to bnpme N#A and Iocal project ddvwy by embancing do parm"Ip ift you Cmitrafts 4WW"t 101" Out 04 dds 001400 opportumity - REGISTER NOW. JA -10-00 MON 16:12 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAX N0, 9166588. 4 p, Q2 .@iuu�Y'Si�EiIVL�vi��y�,�µiwaiuviiiU�.:1.Mtn.!Iilu:Yu!iW�i�UYtYINfGiY,INtl�inuiun�truip�wxrxruiun�nix :. ...��................W..- .............._ __ Preliminary Program Weckesday, March S, 2000 8:00 a.m. — 5,00 p.m, Registratim and CityBooks Open - Parradi,re Foyer 10:00 — t 1:45 a.m. Opetfing General Session TECHNOLOGY TRENDS AND THE PUBLIC WORKS Of TOMORRI. iW Examine how emerging advances in technology may be harno led ro manage and improve public works services over the next decade. Noon — 1:45 p.m. General Luncheon Secession A VIEW FROM THE INSIDE WITH DAN WALTER$ If there is one person in the capital city that has his fangrz on Y is pulse of politics it's The Saerahvento .Bee't well-known political columnist:, Dan Watters. JOn us as Dan discusses the changing dynamics of the state legislature, and the future of tvigk*portadoa and inftastructuxe in Califorrita. 2:00 — 3:30 p.m. General Session ENHANCING ELECTED OFFICIALS -PUBLIC WORKS OFFICERS R1,11LATIONSHIPS Perhaps the most vital and isrlluctttial relationship inn city halt i„ between the elected officers acid its top staff. If this relationship is not strong, the whole organ -�wjon can suffer. ;examine the qualities of a good, strong re•lationsWp. 3:45 — 5.00 p.m. General Session RESTORING OUR NEGLECTED AND RAPIDLY DETERIORATINGtI .FRASTRUCTURE Politicians and business leaders are joining die batde cry to re; "nett and .restore the infrastxt "we that holds out cities and counties together, rtom the national RrBuild America campaign to regional efforts across the state, learn how these programs ate educating the public and how your community can help draw public attention to this criticui issue. 5:00 — 6:00 P.M. Hosted Welcoming Reception joist your colleagues for hosted light hots d'oeuvres while cool il.nuing the stimulating discussions generated today. rhmTfday, March 9, 2000 _ ._.. 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Registration and Cityllooks Open —Paradise Foyer 8.00 — 8:30 a.m. Informal Discussion and Continental Breakfasts Sy Reyllon join your colleagues from cities and counties in your local wo to discuss issues of common concern to you. 9-00 — 10:30 am. General Session CALTRANS LEADERSHIP AND YOU: WORKING TO GET THE . +,1i B DONE Caltrans' Director, Jose Medina, and his lead staff will discus is goals and directions for the agency over the next several years. Discuss funding prioride3 YRA how local govemmern and Caltrans can work together to deliver local projects. Pngc 2 055 05 JAN-10-00 MON 16;13 AGUE OF CA CITIES FAX N0. 9166588240 P. 03 NWMtiL4W"ha�YNN-INIINIY:M1!MYI. uIlulwir..A.�uo.. . Y:uw.,.m :w..��.W... .. ..... ...., __...._....__ _...._ 10:45 a.m. — Noon Noon — 1:45 p.m. 2:00 — 2;45 p.m. Thursday, March 9, 2000, ern!inued Concurrent sesslolns 12 REGIONAL BREAKOUTS WITH CALTRANS DISTRICT DiREC TttitS Director Mcdina outlined Caltrans' goals. Now join your region,:! director to discuss ptoject debvety in your community. Genera[ Luncheon LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ISSUES ✓like Gotch, legislative secretary to Governor Davis, will disruc:ft the Govemor's legislative agenda. Learn more about the governor's proposals for tcstotiog CalifotaWs infrastructure. STRESS MANAGEMENT AND PERSONAL CARE IN PUBLIC WORE$ Otie of the nest ways of maintaining the hesltb of the workfottr; and the work place is througlx hutraor. Jim Polley, of Laughter Works Seminars will explore of ;c.tive ways of using appropriate humor to promote chorale and productivity. Corucarrent Informal Discussion Groups ROUND 1 I. DIVERSITY TRAINING California communities have a rich history of diverse cultures !ud backgrounds. As public works officers, you must work with and serve individuals with different perspectives and attitudes. Share with others how you have cyApped yourself tr ,d your staff with the ably to effectively understand and communicate with others. 11. SURVEYING LICENSES Civil togincers registered after January 1,1992, with registralioa numbers higher dram 33,965 can no longer practice land surveying without obtaining a licvi ;::. What has been the impact on public works departnaeo.ts? Should civil en&ieers obtain a lice i ed surveyor certification? Want are agencies doing to respond? III. BIDDING OPTIONS Discussion will focus on different aspects of the bidding proc;:ss ai zmd at grating duality work at reasonable cost. Topics will include pre -qualification of bid,'It-rs, informal bid procedures under the Uniforin Construction Cost Procedures and the uu-'taf bid alternates. Bring your ideas to this stimulatir:g discussion. IV. CONSULTANT SELECTION AND MANAGEMENT Ate agencies using quality -based selection or is it really a "rue -'lifted low bid" or "spread the work" ptocess to select consultants? Whictn works better and 'vrhy? When you Foully get a consultant on board, how do you get them to perform on tkANs and within. budget? Come ,hate your thoughts. Page 3 606 AN-10-00 hION 16 14 „ GA CITIES FAX NO. 9166588240 P.04 IERGUE OF Thurfday, Alurrh 9, 2000, continued 3:00 - 3.45 P.M. Concurrent Informal Discussion Groins ROUND 2 I. BIDDING OPTIONS (REPEAT] Discussion will focus on different aspects of the bidding procetea airned at getting quality work at reasonable cost. Topics will include pre -qualification of bid& rs, informal bid procedures under the Uniform Consttuction Cost Procedures And die. use'd.,krl)id alternates. Bring your ideas to this stimulating discussion. Il. TRAFFIC CALMING 'Ilia technique of managing txaffiic on local streets tzar moved ik.yoad speed humps and street closures. Discuss the success and challenges of a variety of appioachcs used throughout the state. III. FILLINU THOSE STAFF VACANCIES - HOW TO GET AND KFk'P EMPLOYEES Share your rips on best employment practices and learn what others are doing to find and keep quality employees. IV. PICKIN13 UP THE PIECFS With die multitude of public works' projects accepted each yeiq the public takes their personal safety fvr granted. What would happen should disaster strike 4$.1'ggzg the construction of one of rlheee projects? Would die citizens feel safe to use the facility orrice completed? What would you do, as a public works officer, to reclaim die public's conftdeatcu"t This session loops at a few projects that have faced sucb a dilemma,'what the agency ditf,'i : did riot do, and its ultimate impact on public perception. 4:00 - 4.45 p.m. Concurratst Informal Discussion Groups ROUND 3 1. TRAFFIC CALMING (REKATI 'The technique of managing traffic on local streets has moved firs-yond speed humps and street closures. Discuss die success and challenges of a variety of ups Coaches used throughout the state. 11. BUT IT IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CONTRACT Contract change order claims can ruin the best of conttactox <Ii;d public works official's relationships. Explore dispute resolution techniques that can k4rp the project budget on track and maintain working relations with the contractor. III- FIELD STAFF TECHNICAL, TRAINING Discuss some of the latest tools available to make the job of f:r,iAd staff more efficient and how you can nhake sure staff are equipped to use new technologica IV. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & BENCHMARKING; WHO 0 SUCCESSFUL AND WHY A'?. private industry business practice that many cities have adul'.iaed. Examine what benefits can be realized and what steps must be taken to be successful. 5:00 - 6.00 P.M. No Host Reception ,Page 4 057. - JAN-10-00 MON i6:15 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAX NO. 9166688240 P. 05 7,30 a.m. — Noon 7:30 — 0:30 a.m. 8:45 — 10t i S a.m. 10.30 a.m. — Noon Noon Friday, Afan-h 10, 2000 Registration and CityBOOks Open — Paradise Foyer Informal Discusslon and Continental Breakfast Jovi your coDeagues fox informal discussions on the latest brcal,',inb issues, Concurrent Sessions I. YOU MEAN I REALLY HAVE TO WORK WITH FINANCE, PUBL1Cr; SAFETY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES? Public works officers and staff constantly cross paths with otha,J city departments to get their job done. Teamwork is lauded as the means to accomplish con ,jaon goals though real teamwork rectares commitment and understanding. Discover kt err to build Sod nuttute a teamwork culture. II. FINANCING PUBLIC WORKS AFTER PROPOSITION 218 On November 5,1996, the voters passed Proposition 218 - "Ri. ixt to Tote on Taxes Act," 'this update will focus Un the latest practice", tips &nd options to fx ,q,ce public works in compliance with Proposition 218 includitrg use of fees, special charges, C.('.,, P'.s, public authorities, taxes, assessments and bonds, It will also include discussion of a sUue-,ide survey of current practices, concluding General Session LETTERS TO DECI.AN Don't nu5s this powerfitl and hilarious one -Haan show by Jack ('�t,llagher. His message focuses on the heart of community - the fatndy - and offers moving istsi�hts on how we can ergage our youth itt building the future. Jack has appeared nationwide, boil; live and on his television show, has been four times on the Tonight Show; and appcatcd teccar"sj on The Conan O'kitien show. Be here for this unique performance (one that you may want to'Ini rg to your city) Adjourn Pas-"; 0 518 Gob JAN-10-00 MON 16 : 15 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAX N0. 9166588240 w W_w P. 06 Reg4ttation Advance Registration Payment ;[refund Policy Special Accommodations Location Hotel Reservations Hotel Reservation. Deadline Spouses Southwest Airlines Advance register by Wedxxcsday, February 9, 2000, for the full Yeceting and receive a bonus coupotz worth $25 at the Cit)Dook,s bookstore at the meeting. Ls7vn't xraiss this great way to expand and share your learning with your colleagues in City flrlll Your Advance tesistration must be postmarked no later loan Wednesday, February 9, 2000..A.£tcr that date, tl,.e bomu coupon is not available. The registration fee includes prograw 1�3iaerials, two breakfasts, tyro lunches, breaks, and one hosted reception. For any qu"tions r(�,ctrding registration, please coutact the League conference registration office at 925/283-2 %13. Earl Mcda,3g One Dav QA1y City Officials $325 City Officials $195 All Others $375 All Others $245 Payment in ful) must accompany the registration form. You xn;ay pay your registration fee by check, Visa or M2stetCard. No purchase orders, Ametican E.xlz?'css ox Discover cards, please. If paying by credit card, you may register by taxing 916/658-8220+' Advance registrants ratable to attend can send it substitute, or io;t4.ive a te..fund of die registration fee, less a $50 processing charge, by writing the Lee;' -uc of California Cities, Conference Registration Office, Box 1519, Lafayette, C A S•414� fax 925/283-7833• Requests for refunds must be meccived by Friday, Match 3, 2000. WTo assure this program benefits ail who attend, please caU :riu[ Confexence Regiattatiox, Office at 925/283-2113 if any registrant requires special accomii,cdations fot disabilities. Paradise Point Resort 1404 Vfcsc "Vacation Road Sari Diego, Cs lifotnia 92109-7905 858/2M4-4630 fax 858/561-5929 The Paradise Point Resort is offering a special League rate of S 1:39 single or double toom (plus 10.55° o city hotel tax). To cor,fitm hotel rewrtrations, a deposit rr, the amount of the first night's guest room rate or a guarantee Aith a major credit card is regrutsxl. Deposits are mfiurdable if your rescr ,,rdon is canceled within 72 hours prior to the date deer guest is duc to arrive. tecord your cancellation number. If the League rate has sold out befort die cut- off date, the rtcxt available x,ate A-11 apply. Reservations received after the cut-off &aDe of Friday, ,Fcbmary 4, 2000, will be accommodated on a rate and space availability basis onh; the hotel is no longer obligatcd to hold guest roorxis at the League, rate. We urge you to make y+ ,xti reservations early. Check in tune is 4:00 p,m.; check out dyne is noon. Luggage may be stort0 at the bell desk Friday, .February 4, 2000 '11mre is 110 registration fee for spouses who attend the mcchistg rr'ho are not city official., or other public officials or attorneys. AMeal tickets may be putchas(4 inn -site at the League. registration desk.'lliere is no spouses program planned. For fur+er information oa events going on in the area, contact the concierge desk of the hotel Discount airfares are available for city travel in California, Unret��ricted ticket vouchers may be purchased in advance though the League -sponsored Statewide. li$rchasing Program. Tickets earn be purchased for $70 per segmr•.nt, ($140 round trip). if your city] has not already purchased a rrinimum block of six vouchers, coxitact Karen Dutham at the`.,;*guc (916-658-8262) or email dutha;xik@cacities.org cacities.org for Southwest information and to tegvesc!order fott"s (or call fax -on - demand at 800/572-5720, ##17), Allow two to three weeks for dr iii,exy. For tlxose who already have the ticket vouchers, advanced seat xeservations are by calling Southwest toll free at: 800/435.9792. Current prices are effectiv c January 1, .2ri "i(). Tir;kcts on hand are valid at the price purchased tuttil they expire. Page 6 05 iJ CA CITIES FAX N0, 9166588240 P, 07 JP.N-10-00 MON 16.16 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES FAX ,ta ,0;,;�,,m,�;�,y w-.�,= Hertz Directions Shuttle Service Parking Discount rates with unWnited mileage ate available one week pfiot and one week after this meeting from Hertz. Call Harz Mcetiirg Service$ at 800/654-2,340 and indicate the League of California Cities Meeting Number CV#01270002. FrVm I-S South -- Exit Sea World Drive and two right. Follows :�'ea Woxld Drive to Ingraham Street exit on right, Continue ors. Ingrabarn Street to the secong! ttaffrc light - West Vacation Road. Turn left into the hotel's main entrance. Firm I-5N4rth Exit Sea World Drive and turn left over ftc4r4ay. Follow Sea World Drive to Ingraham Street exit on right. Continuc on Ingraham Street to he second traffic light - West Vacation Road. Turn left into the hotel's rnain entrance. .Fpvm 1-15 South — South on Interstate 15 to Highway 103 Sout i to Interstate 8 West. Exit Sports Arena/West Mission Bay Drive and turn right at dxe trR l:tc light - Ingrahuta Street. Continue on Ingraham Street to the second traffic light, West I'i"Acation Road, Turn left into the hotel's main entrance.. Frans 1.8 ti%rt Exit Sports Arena/West Mission Day Drive aiA turn right at the traffic light - Irgrahairi Street. Continue on Ingr%barn Street to the second tf;P�;iic light - West Vacation Road. Turn left into die hotel's main entranee- Fivm Saa Dxgo Take North Harbor Drivl x) laurel Street and follow sign to Interstate 5 North. Continue on Interstate 5 North and exit i. Sea Vlorld Drive. Turn left over the freeway and follow Sea World Drive to Ingraham StxefI exit on right. (continue on Ingtahaen Street to the second traffic light - West Vacation R.o;rl Turn left into the hotel's train entrance. For transportation from the airport, go through the baggage c1m area to the middle island outside the terminal and wait for Cloud Nine Shuttle.. Continue : service. is offered approximately every 15 rriututes. Contact Cloud Nike Shuttle ai68/278-0665. Larking is complimentary for all League guests and mceting stWidees. P;Te7 0 610 10 c&t!t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Change Order to David Evans and Associates to Provide Construction Observation Services for Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project 99-07 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $18,500.00 for David Evans and Associates (DEA) to provide construction observation services for Project 99-07, Citywide .Median Island Landscape Improvements (Calle Tampico, Calle Sinaloa and Avenue 52). The following table represents the previously approved project budget for Project No. 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements: Construction Costs: $346,211 .86 Design: $14,800.00 Inspection/Testing: $26,831.42 Administration: $17,310.59 Subtotal: $405,153.87 Contingency: $39,035.39 Total Anticipated Costs: $444,189.26 As indicated, adequate funding is available within the Inspection/Testing line item to cover the $18,500.00 requested by Contract Change Order No. 1 to DEA's existing contract. Since RDA Funding is being utilized for this project, the City bid the project with prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. TAPWDEPT\COUNCIU2000\00011 Bc.wpd Project No. 99-07 consists of furnishing and installing landscape lighting, hardscape materials, planting, and irrigation improvements for Calle Sinaloa medians (Avenida Bermudas to Eisenhower Drive), Avenue 52 medians (Desert Club Drive to Avenida Bermudas), and Calle Tampico medians (Washington Street to Eisenhower Drive). On July 20, 1999, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program. The adopted program includes the Calle Sinaloa, Calle Tampico, and Avenue 52 median landscaping improvement projects. On August 5, 1999, the City entered into an Agreement with DEA to provide plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate (PS&E) for Project No. 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements. The agreement included a provision for DEA to perform construction observation services as an optional task at the sole discretion of the City. On September 7, 1999, the City Council approved the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E), and authorized staff to receive bids for Project No. 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements. On November 16, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $346,21 1.86 to Mark Logan Landscape, Inc. to construct Project No. 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements. Contract Change Order No. 1 (Attachment 1) initiates the optional construction observation services provided for within DEA's Professional Services Agreement (PSA). Construction observation services include: project observation, quality control of installation of plant materials, hardscape, irrigation elements and lighting fixtures; inspection of construction conformance to design documents, and construction schedule monitoring. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $18,500.00 for David Evans and Associates (DEA) to provide construction observation services for Project 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements (Calle Tampico, Calle Sinaloa and Avenue 52); or 2. Do not approve Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $18,500.00 for David Evans and Associates (DEA) to provide construction observation services for Project 99-07, Citywide Median Island Landscape Improvements (Calle Tampico, Calle Sinaloa and Avenue 52); or 0 6 Aw 002 TAMDEMCOUNCI U2000\0001 16c.wpd 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, lzz4lF>� . ChYis A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Change Order No. 1 063 003 TAMDEMCOUNCI U2000\0001 18c.wpd �l� D 4aNMNG(/ ATTACHMENT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: Sheet 1 of 2 PROJECT NO. 99-07 Calle Tampico, Calle Sinaloa and Avenue 52 Median Island Landscape Design Services CONSULTANT: David Evans and Associates 800 North Haven Avenue, Suite 300 Ontario, CA. 917644915 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. ****************************************************************************************** David Evans and Associates shall perform construction observation services which include: project observation, quality control of installation and location of plan materials, hardscape, irrigation elements and lighting fixtures; inspection of construction conformance to design documents and construction schedule monitoring. The consultants proposal, dated December 17, 1999, is attached and made a part hereof. ****************************************************************************************** Previous Contract Amt. Through Change Order No. _0_ $ 14,800.00 Add this Change Order S 18,500.00 Revised Contract Total $ 33,300.00 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: -90- additional days contract time beginning January 20, 1999. ****************************************************************************************** Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: ****************************************************************************************** We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above. Accepted By: -Title: Consultant: Date: C T:\PWDEFT\PROJECTS\99POU\9907cwmodls\Deaccol.wpd FAX NO. : 9094815757 Dec. 17 1999 11:24AM P1 DAVID EVA,NS AND ASSOCIATES, Dccembcr 17, 1999 Boo Noah Flumn Menus SuR6;00 Mr. Nick Nickerson onlurto. C#Uf°^u0 91761 City of La Quints 9'rtc 909•4a,s7so 78-495 Calla Tampico La Quint&, CA 92253 Faz gog.�8is7s7 SUBJECT: CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR CALLE TAMpICO, CALLE STNALOA, AND AVENUE 52 Dear Nick: I have had a chance to review our original estimate of $18,500 for construction observation services on the above noted project, and have the following comments and suggestions. Previously, we had anticipated a project duration of 60 days and now the overall time frame has been extended to 120 days; primarily for the purpose of adding Rondo Channel to the scope of work. We anticipate that the contractor will only require 60 days to build the streetscape portion of the project and therefore our original estimate will remain in tact. Should the project require DEA, to provide construction observation services for Rondo Channel, we will request that DEA be compensated accordingly. We can negotiate any additional services at the time that may be required. Once again, our scope of services would include two site meetings per week which includes a weekly construction meeting, telephone coordination, a final walk tbru and project approval. Administrative functions necessary to adhere to city requirements, such as preparation of field directive changes, work directive changes, daily logs, and change orders, shall be included within the total fee. please note that this proposal does include the work of Joe Nolan of Dream Engineering for observation services required for electrical engineering and lighting. If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to call. We look forward to the continued opportunity to provide landscape architectural services to the City of La Quinta. Happy Holidaysl Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Kim S. Rhodes, L.A. Senior Associate O6r 0 01 b T-itit 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: 5 ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community Development Director and Planning Commissioners to PUBLIC HEARING: Attend the League of California Cities Planners Institute to be Held in Monterey, California, March 1- 3, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the authorization for overnight travel for the Community Development Director and Planning Commissioners to attend the League of California Cities Planners Institute to be held in Monterey, California, March 1-3, 2000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Budget allocated $7,600 for the Community Development Department staff and Planning Commissioners to attend this conference. Attendance at this conference is estimat6d to be $1,265 per person based on the following costs: Registration $ 290 Hotel registration $ 410 Travel $ 340 Meals 225 TOTAL $1,265 These funds are budgeted in the Travel and Meetings Account for the Community Development Department (101-401-637-000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Funds have been budgeted for staff and Planning Commissioners to attend this conference in years past. Information regarding the conference is contained in Attachment 1. 066 COH.001 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Approve the authorization for overnight travel for the Community Development Director and Planning Commissioners to attend the League of California Cities Planners Institute to be held in Monterey, California, March 1-3, 2000; or 2. Do not approve the request for the Community Development Director and Planning Commission to attend the League of California Cities Planners Institute; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, L-'-' a___ rry Herman immunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. League of California Cities Planners Institute Information 067 tj() COH.001 Preliminary Program ATTACHMENT 1 Wednesday, March 1, 2000 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M. Registration and CityBooks Open - Po,tok 1.0bby, Monte, y Co„jm„or Cenrff 1:00 - 2:15 p.m. Opening General Session THE FUTURE OF CALIFORNIA: TRENDS AFFECTING PLANNING FOR YOUR CITY Get a glimpse of what is ahead for cities so you can better plan. Learn from a world-renowned futurist about the profound changes ahead and their implications for California cities. 2:30 - 3:30 p.m. Trends Affecting Planning For Your City These concurrent discussion sessions, grouped by geographic region, will let you explore in greater depth the implications for your own city and region of the issues and trends described in the opening session. Your ideas will be recorded and shared with you on Friday morning. 3:45 - 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS A General Plan And How To Write And Update It II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Economic Development for Built -Out Cities III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Using Teams To Deal With Complex Issues IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Smart Growth: What is it Really? V. CURRENT ISSUES Increasing Public Participation in Planning SAS - 6:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions 1. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS Council / Commission Relations II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Local Control, Good Planning and School Fees III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT One Stop Counters and Web Sites IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Integrating Land Use in Transportation Planningjr Page 2 U04 5:1 S - 6:30 p.m. 6:30 - 8:30 P.M. 7:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 7:30 - 8:45 a.m. Wednesday, March 1, 2000, continued Concurrent Sessions, continued V. CURRENT ISSUES Design Issues and Public Involvement in Affordable Housing VI. TECHNOLOGY TOOLS Tapping Technology to Get a Pulse on Public Thinking Reception and City Symposium Enjoy a generous buffet reception while visiting with your planner colleagues, and gathering information about innovative planning projects and practices from cities around the state. Please bring with you 50 copies of information on your innovations for others to take. Thursday, Match 2, 2000 Registration and CityBooks Open - Ponvia Lobby, MonuT Coxfmxae Cexter Focus Sessions Join in these valuable breakfast sessions on a variety of topics of current concern. Hear what other cities are doing that can benefit you. POTENTIAL TOPICS: • Coastal Cities • Historic Resource Preservation Ordinances • Group Homes • Niansionization • Gated Communities • Specific Area Plans • Planning for Water Use • Planning for the Young and the Elderly • Planning for Public Safety 9:00 - 10:30 a.m. I Concurrent Sessions 1. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS BASICS Open Meetings and Conflict of Interest Laws II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Providing Certainty in the Development Process III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Performance Improvement in the Development Review System 069 Page 3 005 Thursday, March 2, 2000, continued 9:00 - 10:30 a.m. Concurrent Sessions, continued IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Planning and Agricultural Land Preservation V. CURRENT ISSUES Using What's Already There —In -fill Development VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES The Fiscalization of Land Use: Understanding City Finances 10:45 a.m. - Noon Concurrent Sessions I. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS The Basics of the California Environmental Quality Act For Commissioners 11. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning for Technical Infrastructure III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Creating Interdepartmental Cooperation IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE CITIES How to Think Outside the Box --Urbanization vs. Sprawl V. CURRENT ISSUES Dealing with Non -Conforming Uses VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES Getting Control: Effective Advocacy for Planners Noon - 1:45 p.m. General Luncheon CITIES IN HISTORY -- WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF US IN 200 YEARS? A lighthearted look at how key cities and leaders have led us to our present situation. 2:00 - 3:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS Conducting Effective Commission Meetings II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Tax Breaks for Development: Pros and Cons III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Ethics in Planning. Creating a Cultural Norm for Decisions, Negotiations and Operations 070 Page 4 UJo Thursday, Match 2, 2000, continued 2:00 - 3:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions, continued IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Policies That Encourage Green Buildings V. CURRENT ISSUES Design Review and Standards VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES Litigation and Legislation Update 3:45 - S: IS p.m. Concurrent Sessions I. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS Findings and Takings 11. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Getting the Performance You Want III. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Active Versus Reactive Planning IV. CURRENT ISSUES Code Enforcement to Assure Projects are Built as Approved V. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES City - School Planning. Creating a New Future 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. No Host Reception and Networking Friday, March 3, 2000 8:00 a.m. Registration and Cityllooks Open - Po,tola Lobby, MoateM Conference Center 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. General Session and Continental Breakfast LOCAL PLANNING ON A GLOBAL CONTEXT: A NEW PERSPECTIVE 90 S - WAS a.m. Concurrent Sessions 1. PLANNING COMMISSION BASICS Engaging the Public in the Planning Process II. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Redevelopment as a Planning Tool 071 Page S 007 Friday, Match 3, 2000, continued 9:15 - 10:45 a.m. I Concurrent Sessions, continued III. PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT / DEVELOPMENT Computer Visualization for Improved Decision Making IV. LIVABLE / DIVERSE COMMUNITIES Fostering Self -Supporting Neighborhoods V. CURRENT ISSUES How to Develop an Effective Housing Element VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES Cooperative Planning Beyond Borders 11:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. I Conduding General Session PLANNING FOR OUR NEEDED INFRASTRUCTURE 12:15 p.m. I Adjourn 072 Page 6 VU(IJ T-itit 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Planning Manager and Historic Preservation Commissioners to PUBLIC HEARING: Attend the 251h Annual California Preservation Conference, April 13-16, 2000, in Monterey, California RECOMMENDATION: Approve the authorization for overnight travel for the Planning Manager and Historic Preservation Commissioners (HPC) to attend the 25th Annual California Preservation Conference, April 13-16, 2000, in Monterey, California. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Budget allocated $7,600 for the Community Development Department staff and Historic Preservation Commissioners to attend this conference. Attendance at this conference is estimated to be $1,144 per person based on the following costs: Registration $ 110 Hotel registration $ 534 Travel $ 200 Meals 300 TOTAL $1,144 These funds are budgeted in the Travel and Meetings Account for the Community Development Department (101-401-637-000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: •e n BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Funds have been budgeted for staff and HPC to attend this conference. Information regarding the conference is contained in Attachment 1. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh.travel.wpd 073 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the authorization for overnight travel for the Planning Manager and Historic Preservation Commissioners to attend the 25th Annual California Preservation Conference, April 13-16, 2000 to be held in Monterey, California, March 1-3, 2000; or 2. Do not approve the request for the Planning Manager and HPC to attend the 25tn Annual California Preservation Conference; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, At7� �- gerr, Herman Co munity Development Director Approved for submission by: l Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. 25Ih Annual California Preservation Conference information. 074, u02 COH.001 ATTACHMENT 1 Join us on the Monterey Peninsula for the 2000 California Preservation Cpnference. The Peninsula is an extraordinary setting for historic preservation. The conference will feature nigbile workshops and tours of Monterey's adobes, Pacific Grove's Victorians, C'armel's cottages,and Monterey County's Pebble Beach and agricultural towns. Come enjoy the Monterey Peninsula as your classroom for historic preservation! In addition to the tours. the prOUW2 will feature four tracks: Preservation Tool Kit is designed to help with your preservation projects. It will address the latest in documentation techniques, earthquakerprepared- ness, materials conservation, and accessibility. Interpretation of Historic Resources will share -creative ways to interest a greater audience in your historic resources through topics such as heritage tourism, multi -cultural perspectives, living histoyand "novel" approaches . to preservation. Preservation Issues - Moving Into the Neat Century will help you catch up on issues that you may face in your community including new land use regulations and property rights issues, economic and military base re -use issues, and partnerships with open -space advocates. 11 33r Preservation 101 includes sessions for citizens, nonprofits, commissioners and property owners who want to:preserve historic' resources intheir communities. Topics focus on design standards and guidelines, organizing local nonprofits, CEQA, surveys and inventories, making effective presentations and local case studies. Hotel Reservations: Conference head- quarters will be the DoubleTree Hotel in historic .downtown Monterey — $119 single- and $139 double -occupancy. Call (831) 649-4511 and refer to the California Preservation Foundation to make reservations and receive these discounted room rates. Hotel rooms are limited on the Monterey Peninsula. Please make your hotel reservations early! Conference Registration: Registration brochures will be available from the California Preservation Foundation in early February. Call (510) 763-0972 for brochures to be mailed or you will be able , to download it at' www.cafifomiapreservation.org r oU4 075 T4tyl 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for an Animal PUBLIC HEARING: Control Officer to attend the "National Animal Control Association Training Academy" given by The Law Enforcement Training Institute School of Law -Extension Division University of Missouri -Columbia, to be held in Sacramento, CA, February 21-25, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: Approve authorization for overnight travel for an Animal Control Officer to attend the "National Animal Control Association Training Academy" given by The Law Enforcement Training Institute School of Law -Extension Division University of Missouri - Columbia. The academy will be held in Sacramento, CA, February 21-25, 2000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The training will befundedfrom Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-353-637- 000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: ♦ Registration $ 450 ♦ Meals 250 ♦ Travel 300 ♦ Car Rental 100 ♦ Hotel 400 Total $ 1,500 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This course includes such topics as animal abuse, animal behavior, courtroom testimony, evidence collection, interview skills, and animal control skills, as provided in Attachment 1. The class will provide hands-on animal control skills training on a wide variety of domestic animals and livestock. 070 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve authorization for overnight travel for an Animal Control Officer to attend the "National Animal Control Association Training Academy" given by The Law Enforcement Training Institute School of Law -Extension Division University of Missouri -Columbia, to be held in Sacramento, CA, February 21- 25, 2000; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, �o'tit Tom Hartung, Buildin and Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. National Animal Control Association Training Academy reservation form 077 `u2 Cyst �w>'` LkA O 7 U ai Off„"", C.°+ ': R E � •ay,Oa ob ° o wp �`�C � 3 � ° '�� ,� a 60 LO. y O R U° K c e`a y 00 c:� U >, 6� U O D V •d pNp WR w y C A p N C O a CQ y d w �w�"wu;, N to N kCiCa.cc O i. >•, C >en ' cd O y ° C u OO C p bq u y 67 O) •^07 Vpi y n y; cO p a Z Lcu C W C (v U a b Gp p V .�' �•C�L•'C 6i •� W O C ai 'r O 0. O 07 C 0 W y� O ONO O p� 0 0 0 .D e E w cd E L 6! U p O y Vi O O yL, ' p E' 3 d E O o0 L U M a° aU 2 v t W V ou p N. a U° y C bA O W- C L. L" ° r _ o tn _ •ci u 7 •� •00 "O i, •� 3 p a o Gz, u c a°i > a C O C L O C " s ° L •p N c0. L RR vUi L v: O ?� �--i y O NC �' ar 'O Z F z r F o E w �� s.ue+ a�OC O' Un vyi y OO Oi Op A O O� vn C N w DA ) O c C O 7 E y>.+ L m c.oF U c 60 a=i _ t , W ncis 2 o c 3 > c c > u e o o W s° a�o 04 v) o0EaWi'E3� h U °c - E oho aui o cz ca > C Q C O = U w o O N •0c 3 3 o c U N C S O N° U W U. 0 3 o c cnU o o Q LL5 Q Q Li. vn U GG U U U ti ca 3 �, t0. O •D O. E vi cLi .w E m = o U U c a ca w E wz EENoEo.�ov C OS 3 0 ti' 'WI e L^ aocc 0 CZ �goOLooU��`L U o L F w o a d w p 0 o? L a�°i cti s v' ai c E a o c E 3 U O c ccc• cz Fp E C a)N N •C z V i W o c= u c0 rn , N U U 'O m .a U cQ v.°.3."� .0 W+ E oA O in U cO in ->p 'b L D'o, a..?,�F5Q � EFSdss'v^�F � . " H U U cz 3 •^ c "0 cAa 'h d E `E U . � E Q y = u n z ° w •N c o Z O �°• O . � oe.0Uo Q a c U cz _ L E .�. E-' Ecu c°r°e�ia�E�E c ° °� n• � 'v° o oLu o_ LU o z.°h.ao�cn. u a 00 V c 'a C ,C E E Q Q . cd caw E z .L. ATTACHMENT 078 004 C National Animal Control Association Bulk Address: 132 S. Cherry Olathe, Kansas 66061 ozzQ� � �4 f Q La Quinta City Animal Control PO Box 1504 La Quinta CA 92253 NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION U.S. POSTAGE PAID OLATHE,KS PERMIT NO.83 Dated Material: If addressee is no longer at your organization, please route this material to addressee's replacement, supervisor, or director. Thank you. c 0 1!1 v :J Q L y � o � > E— 8� o a r — a < o T cLe j Z c v J J J y :3 Z Vi r`j,• LO L C a m E x u a o F = L •`c � p cc C 3 is N y L 7 L 00 C O e0 •`' cU NM • � y c C O v w y�� n v N� ° r C •r y L x t� �f y xo = o B V U—U..i C � s C w E d E a 5 OJ C � pp H y 3 �l a.•� T4ht 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Approval of a Request by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, to Utilize the Study Session Room for applicant testing on January 20, February 3, February 16, March 2, March 15, 2000, 9:00 a.m. to Noon AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: S STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a request from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, to utilize the Study Session Room for applicant testing on January 20, February 3, February 16, March 2, and March 15, 2000, 9:00 a.m. to Noon. None None The Bureau of the Census has requested that the Study Session Room be made available on the following days: January 20, February 3, February 16, March 2, and March 15. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines (Attachment 1). A complete application has been submitted (Attachment 2) for the City Council's consideration. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a request from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, to utilize the Study Session Room for applicant testing on January 20, February 3, February 16, March 2, and March 15, 2000, 9:00 a.m. to Noon; or 2. Do not approve the request from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census to utilize the Study Session Room; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung Director of Building & Safety Approved for submission by: O Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. City Guidelines 2. Application 01 /10/00 c:\agenda\chamberuse 081 002 Amendcd 12/20/94 ATTACHMENT 1 I II. IV. CITY OF LA QUINTA GUIDELINES FOR USE OF CIVIC CENTER FACILITY 1. Council Chamber - seats 106. 2. Study Session Room - seats 33. 3. Groups are to use the Study Session Room unless the size of the group or the need for audio-visual equipment necessitates use of the Council Chamber. 1. The primary use of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room is for the conduct of meetings for the entities listed below: a) City Council b) Planning Commission c) Community Services Commission d) Design Review Board e) Art in Public Places , f) Investment Task Force g) Other City appointed boards, commissions and committees 1. Other non-profit and Governmental Agencies, 501(c) entities, that serve residents of La Quinta, may be granted permission by the City Council to use the facilities. 1. A person or group desiring to use Civic Center { facilities must file an Application for Use Permit with the City Manager's Office. Applications must be completed and submitted at least three calendar weeks prior to the scheduled event, unless otherwise waived by the City Council. 2. All qualified groups using the Council Chamber and Study Session Room must have $500,000 general liability insurance coverage per occurrence, Listing the City of La Ouinta as an additional named insured. Groups that do not have insurance may purchase special event insurance through the City's insurance policy. 3. All applicants must indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all losses and/or claims. Indemnification forms will be provided by the City and must accompany submittal of the Use Permit Application. 4. Users of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room will be responsible for all damage to the building, appurtenances thereto, and shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for any loss or damage to City property caused by such use. 5. The City must be notified as soon as possible of any cancellations, so that the facility may be reassigned. 6. Approval shall be granted by the City Council. The City Manager is authorized to permit a use when the Council meeting schedule precludes Council consideration in a timely manner. Approved permits will be issued to the person filing the application prior to the event. 7. In the interest of widest community use of the Civic Center facilities, no one non-profit community group shall use the facility more than eight (8) hours per month.* 1. The City shall charge for after hours use of Civic Center facilities. Said charge is to recover full cost for use of the facility (personnel, equipment, { electricity, etc.) and shall be paid prior to the use. The hourly rate shall be established by the Council during the City's Annual Budget Review process. * Governmental Agencies are exempt from this requirement. 2. A refundable cleaning deposit is required. The City may withhold all, or a portion, of the deposit if cleanup is required. The deposit will be established based on the use as follows:* (a) Session Room = $200 (b) Council Chambers (up to 53 people) _ $300 (c) Council Chambers (54 people plus) _ $500 :4;� DTO 1 ' V*��Vq 1. City owned audio visual and public address equipment may be used, provided City staff is responsible for its operation. ��- cfAn FPO-Y040kt;-400)� &I 1. Any proposed use of the Council Chamber or Study Session Room shall not lead to the cancellation of a r ecxularly scheduled meeting. 2. For non -City functions, use of the Chamber and Study Session Room, shall not be prior to 8 a.m. or extend beyond 10 p.m. 3. Food, water, and beverages shall not be consumed in the Civic Center facilities. 4. Smoking shall not be permitted anywhere in the Civic Center. 5. Juvenile organizations shall have adequate supervision when using Civic Center facilities at a ratio of not less than one adult per twenty minors. Disregard of this rule shall be considered cause for immediate cancellation of the Use Permit. 6. Any approved Application for Use of Facilities may be revoked without previous notice where conflicting dates with a City purpose have subsequently developed. For other cause(s), permits may be revoked at any time upon 24 hours notice. 084 * Governmental Agencies are exempt from this requirement. 0 016 7. No animals, except those necessary for disability assistance, are permitted in the Civic Center. B. No admission fees may be charged, unless as a fund- raiser for the organization renting the facility. 9. These guidelines may be modified at the discretion of the City Council. FY 1993/94 hourly rate for use of the facilities is $32 ATTer_uucNT 2 Facility Requested: I PS-4-i 4 4 Sooc,-e— Type of Event: Public ✓ Private Description of Activity: /-G—OCR A-3-00 3-0-00 q, no min _iaoeA� Date (s) of IIse: /-ao-oo a-/(P-6o 3-ice-oo Size of Group: ago a.5 Time of Use: Start (a. ./p.m.) 9:0o Finish (a. Total Hours of Use 3 x S32.00 /hour = S /1 1A Certificate of Additional Insured Attached: -or- City Insurance Requested: Fee Paid: N Refundable Cleaning Deposit Paid: /V Session Room = $200 Council Chambers (up to 53 people) = $300 Council Chambers (54 people plus) = $500 Total Paid: $ /1�LA - The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by the rules and regulations of the City of La Quinta relating to the use of public faci ities. Date: l c;�,) q l q Signature: _ Title:�P/'iru r Deposit Required For: f4 P j : / 1.4).G4 Deposit Returned: Date: T 7 3, 6 .. 086 NOTE: The parson signing the application and the statement of information must be an officer of the sponsoring organization. If the person is not an officer of the organization for which application is made, he/ • must present written authorization from the group to sign. 60 Q T-44t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Proposal for an Office of Traffic PUBLIC HEARING: Safety (OTS) Grant Application for a Geographic Information System (GIS) Traffic Analysis Component RECOMMENDATION: Approve a proposal for an Office of Traffic Safety grant application for a Geographic Information System Traffic Analysis component. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Approval of this request would allow the City to apply for a grant in the amount of $51,500 to develop and implement a GIS Traffic Analysis component to be used primarily by the Police Department and the Public Works Department. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) is soliciting memorandum proposals for traffic safety grants for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2000-01. The proposals approved for funding by OTS will become California's FFY 2000-01 Highway Safety Plan (HSP). The City wishes to take advantage of this funding opportunity, on behalf of the La Quinta Police Department, to address the deficiencies and limitations in the current methods of traffic collision analysis. The City would greatly benefit by the creation of an effective, easily maintained GIS-based collision analysis and citation tracking system that could be used to help reduce traffic collisions throughout the City. The system would provide the Police Department and the City information upon which to base engineering, enforcement and other traffic related safety decisions. A draft grant application is included as Attachment 1 with more details on the proposal. The funding request to OTS is in the amount of $51,500 for the purchase of trafficu87 analysis software, two computers, two plotters/printers, GIS training, and data entry. The overall goal in terms of traffic safety is to achieve a 10 to 15% reduction in total collisions annually once the project is completed. This will be accomplished by the joint work of the Police Department and the Public Works Department. The City is currently in the process of conducting a Needs Assessment to purchase a GIS for Citywide use. The City has hired a consultant for the Needs Assessment, which is approximately 80% complete. This commitment by the City to a GIS system will dovetail with the traffic collision analysis program and will increase the City's chances of receiving grant funds. Additionally, the City may realize some economies of scale because of the larger Citywide project. The proposals are due to OTS on January 31, 2000. Although the draft grant application captures the overall concept for a GIS-based program, staff will continue to work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department to gather more refined information and make the appropriate modifications. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a proposal for an Office of Traffic Safety grant application for. a Geographic Information System Traffic Analysis component; or 2. Do not approve a proposal for an Office of Traffic Safety grant application; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, "a Maria Casillas, Manage nt Assistant Approved for submission by: �v, Cam`(. ! ...--- Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . Draft Office of Traffic of Safety Grant Application 0010 ATTACHMENT 1 (January 18, 2000 Council Meeting) CITY OF LA Qu1NTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Memorandum Proposal for a Geographic Information System -based Collision and Citation Analysis System Submitted to the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Submitted by the City of La Quinta Police Department Captain Darla Singerton Contact person: Maria Casillas, (760) 777-7086 �w 004 Statement of the Problem As the fastest growing City in California in 1997, and the second fastest growing City in California during the 1990's, the City of La Quinta has experienced steady increases in traffic and higher levels of congestion on its 150-mile road system. Traffic conditions continue to intensify as the City goes forward with its capital improvement projects to accommodate the influx of new residents and businesses. Additionally, the City experiences a high level of seasonal residents and tourists each year, due to second homes, first class hotels, and numerous golfing opportunities. During this "high season," traffic and congestion issues are of particular concern to the City's Police Department. Currently, the City of La Quinta Police Department does not have an automated traffic records system that can be efficiently utilized for pinpointing and analyzing high collision locations and correlating these statistics to enforcement activities, traffic controls or needed traffic safety improvements. The Police Department staff must compile information by labor intensive methods because of the limitations of current resources. Collision statistics are currently compiled manually using the SWITRS reports that come to the Police Department quarterly from the California Highway Patrol. The Engineering Department also works with data from the SWITRS reports, as well as reports that come directly from the Police Department. However, there is a discrepancy in the number of total reports the Engineering Department obtains from SWITRS and the Police Department. On average, SWITRS' total number of reports for a given year is lower by 10 reports than that reported by the Police Department (a summary table is included as Attachment 1). In most cases, to obtain sufficient detail for effective enforcement and engineering decisions, the actual SWITRS report must be pulled from the files and evaluated. It is very labor intensive and time consuming to obtain even the most basic collision summaries. Information useful to the Police Department and the City through a GIS- based program, that can seldom be assembled, includes lists of high collision locations, DUI collisions, bicycle and pedestrian concentrations by location, and prevailing collision patterns at intersections and midblock locations. Additionally, due to limited personnel, collision diagrams are prepared infrequently. Attachment 2 provides a summary of collisions for the four year period from 1994 to 1998. This very generalized collision information shows that there are a significant number of right- angle, left -turn, head-on and rear -end collisions throughout the City. These are the types of collisions that are susceptible to correction. However, an in depth analysis would be required to determine how to achieve a reasonable reduction in these collision types. Accurate and timely information is critical for engineering/enforcement studies and project budgeting. Selective enforcement programs, design of improvements and upgrade of substandard traffic control 090 devices is difficult to justify and support without a comprehensive collision information 2 005 and retrieval system. While critical, staff time is limited (or unavailable) to manually accumulate, evaluate and maintain the basic information on high -collision locations. The City of La Quinta is currently in the process of conducting a Needs Assessment to purchase a GIS for Citywide use. The City has hired a consultant for the Needs Assessment, which is approximately 80% complete. Additionally, the City has budgeted $50,000 within its FY 1999-2000 budget to fund the Needs Assessment and the GIS implementation plan. This commitment by the City to a GIS system will dovetail with the traffic collision/citation analysis as part of this grant proposal. The City may realize some economies of scale because of the larger Citywide project. Proiect Goals and Objectives The primary goals of this project will be to create an effective, easily maintained GIS- based collision analysis and citation track system that will be used to reduce the frequency and severity of traffic collisions throughout the City. The system will provide the Police Department, the City's traffic enforcement personnel, transportation engineers, and department managers with timely and accurate information upon which to base engineering, enforcement and other traffic related safety decisions. The objectives for the project will be: 1. Increase the productivity of Police Department staff by creating an efficient Computerized GIS- based Collision and Citation Tracking and Analysis System. 2. Eliminate any existing redundant and labor intensive activities by creating an efficient automated records system with GIS capabilities that replaces the manual record systems that are currently utilized. 3. Identify and purchase computer hardware sufficient to operate the proposed database system. 4. Create the ability to generate daily, weekly, monthly and annual activity reports. The reports should be comprehensive and contain relevant data for traffic engineering and traffic enforcement activities. 5. Ensure that the computerized system includes database management capabilities for storing and processing the following data: • For collisions; Store all the information currently reported on the State standard collision reporting form (CHP 555) • Roadway and Mapping; Using GIS store a geo-file of all the streets in the City with street names and other relevant data 6. Develop a program for selective traffic enforcement using the GIS based Computerized Collision and Citation Tracking and Analysis System. 091 009 7. Train staff members in the use and maintenance of the new computerized system. 8. Establish regular meetings (monthly during the project) between the Police Department and the Engineering Department. The purpose of the meetings will be to coordinate and discuss data management issues and traffic safety strategies associated with the project. The overall goal in terms of traffic safety will be to achieve a 10 to 15% reduction in total collisions annually once the project is completed. The secondary goal will be to reduce the time needed to prepare collision reports by 15 to 20%. Proposed Solution Phase I - System Evaluation: Review available resources within the City (e.g., Engineering Department, Building and Safety Department) and Police Department and identify the optimal source of collision records appropriate for the proposed system now and for the future. This would primarily include the review and use of Police collision reports. Phase // - Consultant Selection: The City will request proposals from qualified consultants to purchase the computer hardware and develop the software program(s) necessary for continued monitoring and identification of traffic collision and citation statistics. The system will then be ready to identify collision concentrations at intersections and midblock locations, track citation information and provide laptop reporting capabilities. Consultants will be evaluated on their qualifications, past experience, and ability to perform the identified tasks for a reasonable fee. Phase /I/ - System Implementation: The consultant will set up the collision records/citation tracking system with capability to process data to analyze collision information, provide in-depth summaries, plot collision diagrams and produce useful reports. Two computers and two plotters/printers will be purchased that will enable the Police Department to produce the necessary statistical analyses and to plot collision diagrams and "pin maps." Phase IV -Selective Enforcement Program: Develop a program for selective traffic enforcement using the information generated by GIS-based Collision and Citation Tracking and Analysis System. Phase V —Training: Fully train the Police Department staff in the use and maintenance of the GIS-based program. Time Required The estimated time to complete this project is twelve months. 092 4 007 Cost Estimate Item(s) Traffic Analysis Software Program for Police Department and Engineering Department Two (2) Pentium 3 Computers Two (2) Large Format Color Inkjet Printer or Plotter Training on System Use Data Entry (Temporary Services) TOTAL COST Estimated Cost $ 36, 000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,000 2,500 $51,500 003 s 008 ATTACHMENT YEAR POLICE REPORTS DELIVERED TO CITY CHP - SWITRS 1999 212 not available until June 2000 1998 191 180 1997 198 183 1996 181 178 1995 193 178 1994 181 159 1993 158 151 RJV/dv m, 009 ATTACHMENT.2 N # Z M N -WN l0 m cmM M W # 0.0. W R Y 0 c i uo {V R W Z m lt! to M # S �•+ # r y Irl M # O ►� a i > Ci t Z Z ►~ ua LU i7 . V Nam Z Z = LU Z w ;:,a Gi !•• V to .� .ti W .� .-� M to Ip o.t ad a ao � #z U. t .+ o # t o m � O nrt # J = 19M. t ►r 40 wN W tr s a. # C.-2 r m #r ci to # n.t °A r O C a z Q a •�• > O m •+ \ ## r to to O O o t0 O m m 10 to to to O O m N Z \ G Z O t# 6f M t0 t0 O O O W G . O A Q M t t 0. f t W to .+ m O O .+ In .t .r .+ l0 N to H \ t0 t N .� N .�t �-�• G Z O t C. J J _ nO.t O # d r l0 to .+ M 0cm1� 17 �+ •� •~ Cob �► b N p: t Z •� '� ti i nt S # t Z ~ J r # t 0 " a O a t # 0.' w to w t t#r •+ ..t l0 IA m It in 'y z Ix�+ # t t.i P 1� O CDN .•t CD � CA O \ t # 0. N -W N N N W O G O ?� N W CA \ N Z 0. O O 0- 0-)0- N of M O r z Q r tj W Ul - = 0 4. > na G U. rt J t ti lar F r J# J C Z Q. O C.. O J u# r _ ►r R V m J V t J J # Q O t r O Y t Qr W it 0.Z 0. >. t - O 19 t t 0 = Q # t t.i s #t na # ..t .t .•r co •-t M �•t O 0. t QZ N. J # r = 6i i~ # 0 0 6i t r 6i Z M t O r r O C co 4 /9 W 0.• Z O O 0., r cr O S > to I.t Y ci o J o Z o O >• -C 3 a 3 J -cc Q Z x c 0. r t.7 W J J 1 1 Z 6 J m r•t > O Ll W Q Q W U. 1i O Z O o-t Q ►' J C W Ul O W O I O 1 vt r co .r f9 �' O CV. d Z W La ci O J d O YJ f.7 = f9 r r Q H Z r 4A W > (A J O Z as 6i ccZ M a x Z S M t9 S 67 J ►.t LA. of pl M N W a W W O tL N t.i Z rt ►•1 ..•t ?. K W = O O Q O H r W 0. Z ""• O of tr J Q O O O N C C Z a Q Q 0. Ot r W 0. Z r W Z Z Vi ,•+ Q Z 6 Z Z ~ \ .O•t J O Z •w r W 0. W O Q J Q 6 Z cn N Q r U$ 0. = Q " \ .r Ci 19 U) Z �.+ Z J w rt r.� C rt 0.• 19 " O O Q W Q x S r �r D: Z J ifs' 4 9 5 N Y t9 Z Z " W rti 3 N W O. W W m 0. O r r N O N N W r 3 Q r O \ O tL O RD O w O = N w 0.' 1"• W O: 0.' GC W 0. Q /Y W Ul W O_ O ry N Q > H W Q 0. Vl J J Z O Z 0. Q N d O 0. r W O W C a. O Q N Z L7 Y W Q 2 W S S N S O Y r Z - ;nII■ Z = = 0.' = Z S O W W 0. r N Q = rr J W r t0 O r O r Co Z r W O C O ►-� W 3 �••� ►+ Q 0. S 0. .. . 1 '• •• r • • 0 0 i • 0 • • • • 0 r 0 0 N F Z N -L LV .r N O O #IL 0. W #1 O # O LL d # fl O d # N it W Z O # =M YL W N OH a # > LJ # # W Y N N Li # LL' LC N W = U YJ>> Z SWZ Fr 1/l rr H Li N <9 N le LO N 01 M O: V rl rl > > 1 # M # O N Y # W H # J N # J 91 # M W # ][ > N W # J O r CV A N m LV M # H T #o SG r # - N w s M H LS m M 40 > to N so Z ff LV m to A m to O N La LY 6 19 #N LL UN N # N N .+ O # O r+ O # 0.1- m LO N m do V O N N N N J H # N O O LO # f 41 to LLB •'L N# Li m O in .-L .r m CM Ni l' O \ #N IL LL. •y # m m .r A L4 m •-� A . . L. \ N d Cc O O N N .r CI 1- Lr Z Z N �+ LJ W Yl"= 6 > N C. LL Ly J N Li 1- J N Z d O O J Li N 1- O rr # Li0. O N S # # M # O J LJ # -i a J It d O # 1- t� # d # a` z r # � m # N o 6 # # V S # # 0. # 6 Z -L 10 ++ N N N - # F- A # 00 t9 # F- me LO f n N h O rl r1 L4 10 ID N 10 LO m O m ID N .A 49 ob P. LO rr ;� A f N. A Lq - .. to O O O sn pi N .N O .-L Lb O O W LY O Lti O O \ L9 tY J Z Z O O Z S Y Y ri iL J - O O cc d N 1- L.i 67 O Y = = J d d Z S d J o " O a d W LA. U. O Z O > ci IL. LA O NJ O O N LI - M Z " J W O d L7 1 1 H " L9 M.LC O Z d Z u u J- O CJ Z L9 !- 1- d LA Z - W 'a M W W M "r. M O O O O Y - Z J M Z de U. - O 44 J Y. O LL W cm% •�+ - W Z t71 rn J d O O O N tL' K OL > 6 d S R O 1- LL H as J LL C W 1• C W � LL Li' LC O .� -j Z 1- W W A. Z !- W Z Z N d- Z d LL' Z \ O H 0. 67 O d J d d Z N O N d !- A. d L9 LA 096 O LJ Z M Z J K M M rr L9 O' �. S W �. rr .+ 9 7 Z " N W W m Z Lti ry 0 W S 1- tC Z J \ Y Z �-+ W = d W IL m OC Q U. O PJ O U. O S H N tti H W K li: LL' LL Z N O 1- O 6 S ►+ 0. N J O Li N d ►- O O O N O d S S S H S O iL H Z ri 1w S Z O W S Z Z O W W 1- d �+ Me H 1- H Z 1- W Z O LC O " O W = .r = ri d C. 0. N Z J m O O O O O d 7 d 0. 1 *• o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 i i 0 0 0 N Z rto La ft i J 40 R d 0- W R S 92 R O IL a t U o o. t R Z m m •'1 EV co m A N a C4 # W Z /o a # Sw N t if In co 4 O ►y ¢ t > Lf R t W Y N L/ i OS• Z w W L7 M>-1 Z Z W Z w M w h 6.i Y •? m ••t .-• li! N to .-� to co m M w d• .-� C4 N lV O i Z t w t N Y t W r i J w R J W i 1L > # W i J 10 m .y vA 10 t9 mN In m� A 1n # IC•"� N CIAC4 O # r ^• Y i O m # r f M w r Gi A w O r1 10 19 N N 10 40 •P ID ID La It Q N R R IL • . \ # R • A r f7 A M N O •^1 M N # r1 1V N _ ••1 t O O R O w O f 0- r O qv�+ w 10 01 t>p A m O /V r+ M O: t Z N N N ••1 1V J r # i O J R # Lt O A R # L/ A # Ol # t r 10 O m m to O 10 10 10 M A d• 14 # t L1 10 O to 10 to O to to 10 N go O \ # # CL O Y •1 CM cm N W \ 1n W 01 Z 9 O O 0 O "f r A a 19 m .4 N N N O r wZZ w •+ r+ 10 U W M w = Q w O W w Jt Lt r -if Z Q O O J LiR r O O w # Lt O O IL w i O O J L/ # J to 10 J R ¢ O i I -.it R Q h -+ •"1 tV R LLZ Y t � O.• t i O Q i R L1 S i f w # �• # J r O O N N m N •-• .+ O N N 10 t•7 IL t Q Z .•1 A m qw N ••t m t r -" f 00 R r ca A # , r 0 0 d W 6 V• <t C J Z Z O O O w \ O.•' S Y Y w bC J O O Q Q 14 r Li 991 O r Li Y Z ?. J ¢ ¢ Z S Li J J 1 I Z IC J m w O d d WI 4. O Z O > w IL N O W O O �-• C9 w C ►� J W O cc C7 1 1 h �+ t9 > Z O d• 6 Z W Li J CDY7 Z . 1- h Q to Z W O O Z w w w Z Q Z S S J w r M > G7 J w W LL w S w w w O O u Z O w Z Z W m M O W O tL in6i Z w w w Z Z W O de w W Z o w J ¢ o O o In 0: w W. > Q ¢ Z o o r d w 10 -.1 N. 0: W r ¢ - W O 0. IL Z ¢ O .� .j Z !- W W d Z r W Z Z 6n w Q Z ¢ 0: Z ^ h \ O w 0. 0 O ¢ -1 ¢ ¢ Z w O N Q r A. d jj 10 (� t7 M •Z w 0: J Z w w w 7 O' ¢ •.L w i w �. j, `L Jj O O Z w M W W m C Z — w O - W Z r �+ 0C Z J \ Y Z w W = 0. W d O r r M O M M W r 31 M K I.-W Z LY OL W K M O O 6 > W 'Wr J Z Z Q O: O W W d ¢ S u W W WL 6 W W m O O r Q w tY r r h Z r W Z O 99 N r Z i Z M m w 19 m N w I4 m R JQ R dO. 14 N w n W # _ 19 # O W Q # 1.1 G d # # C -1 m 19 b m N 1q 1q N m # WZ R SH w m R r Y/ P! # p M a # > ca t ci t W Y R C C, N -W w w OD M W � Li up Z. Z Z W Z MNM r Ll Y m -W N N n w lq 1q m na C w N '7 # Z 41 # W # J Y R J r # M # iG OC i W # J m �f 19 of b m w 14 W 1V > R Q w N w •r w 1q W R F- w N t O # r m U. Z M r M > b R# r A m m m m b m 1q O n m O m m m m A m m m m A m ON in m m m m O \ f # 96 . Z w {1 R b w 14 O b m N m w Q /0 # N /V w \ t O N 04 # p Z w # O. r A LV w w w w A O Iq Is O N O # Z N N w w w O N OC # R O J r t t J t O ID## r w w O U) N b b IO O V m t# U m N A O n C w O O t Y m w b w N m m N w w r N W \ U, w Z Noe N O Oar v !V N A N w w l9 N Q m M Z Z w .-� N w A O W us r > M O V M -10 9.3 6 r Jt I Q O J L.1 # r I9 A 1q O N W J A A 1q M It Q J R r J # Q r w w w 1q O R Ia. Z u R a # R O Y # V R OC R # Q # Z i Jr w •f' w w w to m O N m N 19 N f m M t Q Z 14 19 N r' N w .ny O. # OO R r 13 # A r Z O d ui O . OC p L7 W Z \ J O Z O L7 Z M m p \ OC O r S O U Y Y- Q S Y Q = 1H J M r Q 39 L.i Q L7 Z J O S Li Q W J Q J W N O W I W O 1 Y. O Z O M Q Z Lo J O M m Z M > M G La ..J Z W Li Z L3 fr O J L.1 cc O OC m Z La Z Q O Z 1 I. -I- S 1 S I-M -cc44 J CO Z ►•1 I.. > . to OC W > O to OC 'aO Q J A m �••• N w J J W O J W Z La. W Q 19 r p W W O O r Y. O W M w $a Q O. S U W Z M Z C O r LO M Z W LO ►r OC Z O na > Z G Z Q N iL W Q 6. Z W S O. M O O p d' M K p Z M r d' Z W d O U. Z ' M 093 \ O M O. L9 p 4 J Q Q Z N O N Q I- A. Q f •"� \ 1.7 Y cm Z 67 Z M N W Z na = M N �• W O. J W K W O. •"'• m O M w r M Z r L7 nr N O O O O' W N N Q S S r N W Z M M Z Z J F- Z Q b O OC Q M > p W U. Q O J 67 Z O Z W Q O : Z O N W N W O. y Q r W OC S iG W Z W Z W N. 6 OC W N O r W Z Z S M M d• I. S N Z J O O Z O. Z N Z Ili. S r O p• W p w O r N Q Ca � Q S M C r S r S r &n Z S r p M lo- W Z .l •1 0 • oe oe o. o M IL = M o M a d d N x J m o 0 0 o O n. o N H Z t 2« r In .. w to r •, r 1q t J Q t aL aL W t S L9 R O LL, Q R L.i O d R i w -7 10 1► N LV N A 10 N m t WZ R SM N Iq # H N N R Orr t W Y N N N V t w aL W 'r U YI > Z Z W 2 .14 F.1 F Li Y .r N 10 O N N N nr IK LV N # Z R I -I R R O # W �r LV # J Y R J F- # ar R ]C Z R W i J .+ N In �r r r/ N N m Iq M. W R H ~ N N ti on t O R H Y R m N S M' Li rr M. La R t 1- N m a7 1q Iq m O m m N O A A O m \ L3 i i 0. m U!O 1� A 1► O O m 1� to r r F- m .-I .r CD.r N ft Iq Q Iq R# N � N \ R O N N # O Z .r R aL F all r P. N N A 1q N .r LV Iq r r to Iq -1 {V �r t i N N aC t i O rr S i R LJ J # O W it# F- 10 10 wIq 10 IO Iq P, f� Iq 10 C./ m i R LiA m W 10 10 all m r N IO 10 \ R i aL 0=' ►'I t r N 10 .r IO N .r .'I Iq O O Y .+ LV LV .y LL \ NIx rr 2 O N C O W N Z Z Yl urn .-1 ..y m V rr J t Li Q I.- JR LL Q O J La # 1- O Cc, t U O O O S R t d rr # O O Yl r+ Li t J # Q to N J R F- J N O t LE i # O Y R t Li Q R t Q # S # F m m .+ N Iq �+ 4c # Q Z .r r .r N aL' i F- O rr 4 R 00 t l Li R m d p 10 W \ L7 m K J Z Z O w O = Y Y 2 be J O O Q Q IA 1- LJ Y = = J Q Q Z S U J J 1 1 Z Q J m rr O Q Q W LL LL O Z La LL to O W O O Ir L9 rr cc l>r J W O Q CA 1 1 1- nr L9 > 4w O cc Q Z La La -J O L9 Z 0 F- F- 6 w Z W O O 2 w u w Z Q Z S = J o-r Y N > V. J M W LL M S /-1 t0 O O O ]L Z = M Z 19 LL N O LL O LL H (� Z ur 1-1 rr Z Z W O S M LL, Z w J Q O O O w C Z w > Q Q Z O O H aL H 10 J LL aC W I.- Q W O d IL AIL cc O oA -J Z M- W W IL. Z I.- W Z Z N nr Q Z Q C Z \ O I^+ aL L7 O Q J 6 Q 2 N N C 1.- d Q 1q V L9 N 2 ar C J C r~ rti ar L4 O G' Q S VI = ►+ 099 O L9 Z o-r Ul W W m IC 0( " O W S F- rr Q Z J \ Y Z w W = n. W A. O I•- 1- I/I O N N W F- a Q I1f Z rr O LL O w O LL O S YI N aC F- W aC Z C LL Z N O 1- O Q > W Q J Z aC Q aC O W W aL 6 = Y W W W Q W W Z O .J O LL W d C O aC O rr O LL = H O H Q d aL N S J m O O O O O aL O Q d • • • • • • • i • i • • • 0 0 • • • N u►4 fK Z M .-4 M M i1 .4 O fK J Q N ri %D N W W 7*11 z 0 CD * 4 mc O 0. * A M M d M N N I*KWZ �` O� IK Z ►r M M 7K F-N M M IK O " a Q 7K > G� rr .-1 M N P 1.1 0>C ►� W O rr Z z z z Z MNhi kn M - N ..4 %Trd N 0.4 Wz a A A u- 7K W O 7K J 0: 1.4 O x W 7K J A in M %O Oh %T r1 O% W * H N N .4 O% q N * 0 N z } * ~ Ci H M V Ir E > M u A Iy > -T w 1K I.- O Mf %T NO N M o N q e0 1l M CO a Z a A ** u v ?� M N in 4 M A O w O %O VI A \ W W 0. 71f 1� Q M �0 �O ►-� N If1 r1 q z 4 M 7*K N \ IK O h NI z N r-4 7K A w W 1- P+ O %T M v M u1 %O rr r♦ N M r4 00 N ►n O 7K z N a J O N OL W * O V N x F- W* U ** z O %T w 7K F- A %o 00 q Ci *t u Ok 40 O� Oh vT Mf O% w a 1*I( >1 * $0 N N N ► N O o > N rM-1 N r�-1 W (L ♦ ' VI GC A N .r O Z� O n F- %0 so N N O% Wk O r4 M 1-4 W OL 1.1 z z rr r♦ .+ �O 0. O W fN 1-1 A z U 1-1 J IK Ci 4 a i- ,J IK v*tt W z = J Z )m IO-1 �*i � ci 64 * Q a0 J III a F'- V *WO A 11( IK O w >-� 0. Q * O E 1*K �0 N M �O N � r1 N N q r1 01 � - z .)*k Q Z iin H M C6 O O W 1*K J * ~ M V 0: CD O M- o a CD 0 A\ W Z O 0C z 1-1 beJ �T O Q a Z = � V >- 3 3 1- L) oc Q I I z 4 J Oq M H O J ix C U. VI A w O O IO-1 0 FO-1 ix 06 W O 40 1 1 F- ►+ C7 > w O w a W z 0 U O o z o I- I- a vs z w A Ix O Z 6.4 L1 oC Z 4 Z x = J ►+ F- N > 0 -+ 1-4 w U. ►+ _ m n o A U Z= I-+ z a u. VI m IL O IL 0 M Z W W O U ►r W z N J Q A O O 0 a 0: OC > a a z O A I- C. ►, A J LL. 0{ W W F- W a 0. W z O F- w Z z 0 0. 1-1 0: Q z cc a O W Z f i' a O% \ J O Z 1 y F- 0. 0 A 4 J a 4 z. 0 O N a S. N N Z 1-1 M .-j 4t 1-1 H 1-1 0 m O 4 = N i 1-1 N r-1 o z N to W W o w w H O \ ?* Z 1-1 W 3 IL W 0. O 0 A o 0 W �! Ot 14 A IL O O O IL O z (n N ix M- W w w w w w 0 O H O 4 > w 4 J z w 4 a O W w 0. 4 S iL W W W Q W w z O O E H 0. 0 J O 0. 0 0. F- A A O N O 4 = = = 0 = a X F z 1-4 0C E Z O 0: z z E W w 1- 4 1-1 w I.- F- I.- Z I-- W z r^ z A ►+ O lL 3 ►r O 1-4 a 0. 0. N) S J 0 O O O O O 0. O 15 W i. V 0: w ~ • r r v s ► ♦ Y ! ! N )- Z * Z H %t O 0% N .-� ♦t W *E 0 )K O LL. a *UO c. W %G •-� �7 n 00 N rd r•1 N N )K Z IN at )K = H M )K 1- (n M *0" a � � ..� r+ V ce o}C H W:2 C) N?-1) Z Z W Z H N H H C� } M OA %O 00 A N N r•1 r1 rd I� M H cC - ry ri r1 00 7 )K Z )1( H )K q N N iK W )IC J r )K H H )I( NC ce )K W 11C J M Ok %O d 00 P. N N m r♦ r 4 Ok In rya r 4 ra 00 W )K 1- (n )K O )K r } OA V) Z H F� C) H :0 M )K )K I-- N O -t r4 N ul M 00 N N %O a A( u r♦ N O O O r q N 0 0 o O O q ♦ IK )K c. z P4 ** N o N N a M Mf .+ N r♦ N \ )K O N N M�q Z r•0 )K c. r N O w rr N in M 00 N N %o O )K Z ri N rya N a V) LY )K NCO J r )I( )1( J O M )K )K r O O O O O Cl O O O O O O V O% )K * V O O O O O O O O O O O O OC H ** 00 O 00 0o N 4 N N N N O o } ra r♦ N '+ IL \ N OC .-1 Z 0 o 0 -) r at in M in %T N rya H m .4 O 0C HZz r4 in O W NH= r H O V H J*U LL. R O* J U)I( r Z Mt Q * d H z )K N V *J H )K a -i *df. N N O * LL. Z V )K O )K *0 }C V 0 )K )K Q wr4 In .-� M 1� r•1 ti 03-6-1 * Q Z N N rr4 I � In of )K A. )K O O )K r C) MC . M r CD OC � O 0C C9 0.LU A z Ix cd z Q O O M 0C ![ J O O Q Q N r V 0 O 31 o L) J J 13 z a on �z-I L .4IL (n Q W O O M CD Fi 0C IN J W O a CD I I r H CD a 0 cC a (� z C) V J O 0 Z O I- r 4 0 Z W a U O z H V w z 4 z i x J H I- 0 i 0 J H W U. H x H Q ]C Z = H Z W W N LL. O LL. 0 V z H H H z w W O w H W z H J 4 Q O O 0 w w w > 4 4 E Q Q r IL H �7 J LL. w W r a W = c. c. ce IY O Ch J z r IIJ W 0. z r W z z 0 H 4 z Q w z ♦ O H o. co q Q J 4 4 z 0 0 N Q r a 4 Ln () (:) 0 z H w J w H H H 0 O 0 Q x VI E H o 0 z H N W W 00 W W H O W x r H oC Z J \ } z H W 3 d W a O r r 0 Q 0 H W r 3 Q Ill ce H 0 W O 0 O W O = 0 0 w r W w w w LL. w 0 O r O 4 W Q J Z w 4 w O W W IL 4 x X W W W Q W W z O E H c. 0 J O IL 0 c. r Q 0 O N 0 4 x x x to x 0 b.0 r ^� w 0 = 0 &. M 0 Q ►Er IOL x iEi 0 IEi a CL GW. 0 s z 0 0 a ice°` F • Qum& V �4 XP CF OF TNAGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance Associated with Tract Corporation of Improvements 28340-2, KSL Land BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 10 Accept improvements to Tract 28340-2 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security. None. None. Tract 28340-2 is located within the PGA West development (Attachment 1). All improvements are now complete and other obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement have been satisfied. Included as Attachment 2 is a spreadsheet indicating security to be released after the City receives the warranty security. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Accept improvements to Tract 28340-2 and authorize staff to release security upon receiving warranty security; or 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. 10 T APW D EPT\COUNCIL\2000\0001 18d. wpd Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Security Outline 103 TAMDEMCO UNC IL\2000\000118d. wpd 09 104 ATTACHMENT 1 105 Improvement Subdivision Improvements Monuments ATTACHMENT 2 TRACT 28340-2 Performance Payment Warranty Security Security Security $751,292 $751,292 $75,129 $6,900 $0 $0 $758,192 $751,292 $75,129 Release performance security when warranty security is received. Release payment security in 90 days (April 18, 2000). Release warranty security in one year (January 18, 2001). 106 TAMDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000118d.wpd vU O 5 M T4'yl 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Approval of Purchase of a Table for the La Quinta Historical Society 6th Annual Gala in the Amount of $750.00 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the purchase of a table for the La Quinta Historical Society 6th Annual Gala in the amount of $750.00 from the City Council's Travel, Training and Meetings Account (#101-101-637-000). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Sufficient funds are available for this $750.00 request in the City Council's Travel, Training and Meetings Account (#101-101-637-000). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The La Quinta Historical Society will be celebrating their 6th Annual Gala on February 6, 2000 beginning at 6:00 p.m. The "Golden Moments of the 50's" celebration will take place at the La Quinta Resort & Club (Salon de Flores). Individual tickets are available for $75.00, and a table for ten costs $750.00. The deadline to make reservations is January 28, 2000. A copy of the invitation that was mailed to the City is included as Attachment 1. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the purchase of a table for the La Quinta Historical Society 61h Annual Gala in the amount of $750.00 from the City Council's Travel, Training and Meetings Account (#101-101-637-000); or 107 07 2. Do not approve the purchase of a table for the La Quinta Historical Society 61h Annual Gala; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, M46 Casillas, Managent Assis nt Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . The La Quinta Historical Society 6th Annual Gala Invitation i 002 i v r U Q K U L G v -o G � u L c u • - at°, E G v I O C K 0 y v 0 3 c I I a �° u 0Je p ti v�2Z.0 i'b¢U C 7 _ ouo v o L C C bnu aQm °,°mU� ATTACHMENT 1 Q C c o L � w E � U b pC� v V c� ` v EQ� o� u h� UUW 4n�r4 o�vnv � �aO��E•••Cai.°�cam�U 1CIJT 004 CD �J T 0 E a 0 a 0 U cd -- 005 TW�p 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Consideration of Appointment of Citizen PUBLIC HEARING: to Riverside County Free Library System Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of a citizen to represent the City of La Quinta on the Riverside County Free Library System Advisory Committee. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: A vacancy currently exists for a representative of the City of La Quinta on the Riverside County Free Library System Advisory Committee. Pursuant to City Council direction, the City Clerk prepared a press release notifying the public of this vacancy. Five (5) letters of interest were received by the January 7, 2000 deadline and are attached (Attachments 1 through 5) for Council's consideration. The next meeting of this Committee is scheduled to be held in La Quinta on January 20, 2000 at the La Quinta Library. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the selection of a citizen to represent the City of La Quinta on the Riverside County Free Library System Advisory Committee; or ill 2. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, J . Greek, CMC/AAE City Clerk Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: Letters of Interest from: 1. Blanche G. Lockard 2. Lucy A. McGowan, CVA 3. Sally Martin 4. James W. Calvin, M.D. 5. Michelle S. Clairmont 002 ATTACHMENT 1 -- 54775 AVENMA ALVARAI CE.IVEG LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIAQ02 _ AM .29 TEL.: 7b0-771-092� DUINT CA CISY ERK'S OFFI r January 4, 2000 City of La Quints, Attention: June Greek, City Clerk P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Greek: I have an interest in serving the people of La Quinta, my neighbors, by serving on the Riverside County Free Library Advisory Committee and am applying for consideration for that appointment. Presently, I am a language arts and social studies teacher at La Quinta Middle School and have taught there since it opened in 1988. Prior to that time I taught middle school and high school English in Los Angeles for ten years. Before moving from New Jersey I taught first grade and upper elementary grades - all subjects. I am a graduate of Cornell University having attained both my Bachelor of Science and Master of Arts in Teaching. I also am certificated in the Education for the Gifted and Talented through the University of California at Riverside University program. Additionally, I have done course work at both UCLA and Cal State Northridge. My earlier career was in editing at Time, Inc. (now Time -Warner), and I have had experience in the real estate field. I hold a lifetime love of reading in a myriad of genre. I would like to utilize this experience by serving on the advisory committee. Sincerely, Blanche G. Lockard (Mrs. T. Swift Lockard) 1004 ATTACHMENT 2 RECEIVE 1999 DEC 17 P1112: 41 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE December 15, 1999 City of La Quinta P. O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: City Clerk Department RE: Application for Library Board Enclosed I am sending you a brief summary of my qualifications in regard to my interest for application to the article that appeared in THE DESERT SUN this morning. Sincerely, Lucy A. McGowan, CVA 48604 Calle Esperanza Laguna De La Paz La Quinta, California 92253-6205 760-564-2832 114 005 LUCY A. MC GOWAN 48564 Calle Esperanza Laguna De La Paz La Quinta, California 92253 6205 Riverside County 760-564-2832 SORIRIARY I am a library graduate, worked in the high school library as a volunteer and in the college library to help defray cost for board and room. Before graduation, my internship was at the four Mayo Clinic hospital libraries in Rochester, Minnesota I have held positions as a professional librarian at the Virginia Public Library in Virginia, Minnesota where I managed the bookmobile service in the county, the bedside hospital service at the General Hospital and served the public at the circulation desk. I was the hospital librarian at St. Mary's Hospital in Wausau, Wisconsin where I had the Medical, School of Nursing and Patients' libraries. While in Wausau, I had the opportunity to organize libraries in Rome, Italy at the Salvator Mundi Hospital. I was the librarian at Providence Hospital in Portland, Oregon where I managed the School of Nursing and Medical libraries. After marriage in 1953, I was the office manager for 23 years in our family business of 45 employees in Portland, Oregon. During my so-called "retirement years" I was appointed to the Lake Oswego Library Board of Directors. One of the projects I was asked to assess was the volunteer program. During my third term I was offered the job of a part-time city employee and for the last eleven years, I have been the Coordinator of Volunteer Services at the Lake Oswego Public Library in Lake Oswego, Oregon where I administrated 150 active volunteers. In addition, on May 23,1990, I received my Certification in Volunteer Administration via the international organization, The Association for Volunteer Administration. I am an active member of the association, chair of the nominating committee and have conducted workshops on certification in six states and one in Canada. I believe my most valuable attributes are that I enjoy communication with people and have a unique gift for inter -personal relationships. My strengths are in planning, organization and implementation. From my past experiences, I find a strong need to document and follow-up. My philosophy of volunteerism has always been by my very nature an innate need to RECEIVE fulfillment and satisfaction through GIVING.. As a citizen of LaQuinta, I would like to offer my talent and time by helping to strenghthen the library system. I think that with cut -backs in funding , volunteer aid could free up time for staff to perform their professional duties and in turn, develop a community spirit of inter -generational camaraderie. IN®RK HISTORY 1988-1999 CoordinatorlVolunteer Services, Lake Oswego Public Library, Lake Oswego, Oregon Half-time employee required to attend weekly meetings of professional staff. Recruit, Interview, Create job descriptions via Staff needs, Dismiss volunteers, Evaluations and Documentations. Plan & organize volunteer recognition events. 1951-1953 Hospital Librarian, Providence Hospital, Portland, Oregon Purchase, Catalog & Classification, Teach classes on How to Use the Library, Organize convocation activities for student nurses and Delegate duties to part-time aide. 1948-1951 Hospital Librarian, St. Mary's Hospital, Wausau, Wisconsin Same as above except for part-time aide but including daily bedside service in the hospital and attending the monthly medical library board meetings. EBMTNN 1943-1947 B. S. in Library Science and Minor in English a) 1988-1990 CVA (Certification in Volunteer Administration) 006 ATTACHMENT 3 RECEIVED 1999 DEC 3 0 AM 11 : 4 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE December 28, 1999 June Greek, La Quinta City Clerk P.O. Box 1504 LaQuinta, Ca. 92253 Dear Ms. Greek: I would like to be considered for the position on the Riverside County Free Library Advisory Committee. I have lived in La Quinta since 1994. I am an avid reader and have always taken advantage of the library system wherever my family and I have lived. I also helped instill in my now adult children a love of reading by taking them with me from the time they were very young. I firmly believe their interest in reading gave them a definite advantage as they went on to college. Even though I prefer non-fiction, I read a wide variety of material and have a sizeable "library" in my home. I continue to have a great interest in learning, even though my formal education is behind me. I am a Registered Nurse of many years experience and work part-time at a local clinic. I specialize in staff development, which involves teaching not only nursing staff, but lay people as well. I also am somewhat computer literate and use the internet for research and general interest. I believe that I would bring an open mind and (hopefully) a fresh perspective to the committee. Thank you, Sincerely, Au_�_ >Xd� Sally Martin 52980 Avenida Vallejo LaQuinta, California 92253 (760)771-1333 E-mail: Dnksnsally@aol.com 11G 007 — ATTACHMENT 4 JAMES W. CALVIN, M.D. 47-515 Via Florence, La Quinta, CA 92253-2122 "R,E CEIVE D `2000 JO! - 4 AN 9: 4 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Monday, January 3, 2000 June Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA Re: Vacancy on Library Advisory Committee, La Quinta Branch Dear Ms. Greek: 1 wish to apply for the vacancy as advisor to the La Quinta branch of the Public Library. The attached Curriculum Vitae gives my background. In summary, I retired about five years ago from the active practice on medicine and moved to this city. I have had but the slightest responsibility for a library, but needless to say, I have used many in my professional career. Most recently, I served on a trustee / director committee with monthly meetings for a hospital / charitable foundation in Santa Barbara, but four months ago my term expired so I am now free to serve elsewhere. I have been on several Boards, most having activities directly or indirectly related to medical care. I would be glad to meet for an interview. Sin ly ours, times W. Calvin, M.D. 117 Telephone: (760) 771-5117 Fax: (760) 564-4840 i is April 15,1997 CURRICULUM VITAE JAMES WILLARD CALVIN, M.D. PERSONAL INFORMATION FORMER BUSINESS ADDRESS: Thoracic & Cardiovascular Medical Group, Inc. P. O. Box 3538, Ventura, California 93006-3538 Telephone: 805 / 648-3066 - voice mail only PRIMARY HOME ADDRESS: 47-515 Via Florence, La Quinta, California 92253; Telephone: 760 / 771-5117 Fax: 760 / 564-4840 SECONDARY HOME ADDRESS: 528 San Ysidro Road, Santa Barbara, California 93108; Telephone: 805 / 969-0956 BIRTH PLACE / DATE: Oakland, California / December 7, 1929 CITIZENSHIP / GENDER: United States / Male MARITAL STATUS: Married (wife - Carrie McCord Calvin) CHILDREN: Carolyne Louise Mumford, Frances Elizabeth Calvin, Sophie Anne Calvin STEP -CHILDREN: Sutton Louis Roley, Trenace Carman Roley MILITARY SERVICE: Flight Surgeon, 1st Lieutenant > Captain, U.S. Air Force December 1956 - December 1958 Duty Stations: Alabama & Texas: December 1956 - April 1957 training Taipei, Taiwan: April 1957 - June 1958 Military Assistance and Advisory Group Suffolk AFB, N.Y.: June 1958 - December 1958 Hospital Commander SOCIAL SECURITY NO: 568-28-5697 MEDICAL LICENSE: California, August 24,1956 (G 003683) EDUCATION SECONDARY: Piedmont High School Piedmont, California 1943 - 1947 (Diploma, 1947) UNIVERSITY: Stanford University Stanford, California 1947-1951(B.A., 1951) MEDICAL SCHOOL: McGill University, Faculty of Medicine Montreal, Quebec, Canada 1951-1955 (M.D., C.M.,1955) INTERNSHIP: Stanford University Service, City & County Hospital (now San Francisco General Hospital) San Francisco, California July 1955 -1956 RESIDENCIES: Assistant Resident, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Hospitals Stanford, California 118 July 1959 - July 1963 009 1 James Willard Calvin, M.D. April 15, 1997 EDUCATION (continued) RESIDENCIES (continued): Chief Resident, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Hospitals July 1963 - July 1964 FELLOWSHIP: National Institutes of Health Research Fellow, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, July 1960 - July 1961 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Lecturer in Physical Science (Astronomy) & Laboratory Asst. (Chomistry), Menlo College, March -June, 1951 Acting Instructor, Department of Surgery Stanford University, July 1963 - July 1964 BOARD CERTIFICATIONS National Board of Medical Examiners Certification # 32711 Date: July 2, 1956 American Board of Surgery Certificate # 12488 Date: May 19,1964 Board of Thoracic Surgery Certificate # 1395 Date: March 28,1965 American Board of Surgery - Special Qualifications in General Vascular Surgery Certificate # 71 Date: November 18, 19$3 PRIVATE PRACTICE EXPERIENCE Sansum Medical Clinic (group practice) Santa Barbara, California, July 1964 - April 1966 Thoracic & Cardiovascular Medical Group, Inc. (solo practice) Ventura, California, Apra 1966 - August 1995 OTHERAPPOINTMENTS Speciality Reviewer, California Medical Review Inc. (California's PRO) 1965-1985 Member, Board of Directors, Rehabilitation Institute of Santa Barbara, 1994-present Member, Board of Trustees, Rehabilitation Institute of Santa Barbara, 1996-present Member (proposed), Scientific Advisory Council, Ramus Medical Technologies, Carpinteria, California, 1996-present PAST HOSPITAL STAFF AFFILIATIONS Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, CA Active Staff,1966-1995 Chairman, Research Committee 1971-1974 Director, Research Foundation 1971- 1978 Board of Editors, Journal of General Hospital, 1979 -1982 Chairman, Institutional Review Board 1986 -1995 Chief of Surgery 1970 & 1977 119 2 1. () ° James Willard Calvin, M.D. April 15, 1997 PAST HOSPITAL STAFF AFF JATIONS (continued) Community Memorial Hospital, Ventura, CA Active Staff,1966-1995 Director of ICU 1976, 1978 & 1991 Co -Director of Non -Invasive Vascular Laboratory, 1977 - 1995 Chairman, Emergency Room Committee 1987 Chairman, AIDS Committee 1987 - 1989 Chief of Surgery 1976 & 1987 Liaison, Building & Grounds Committee 1990 - 1994 Voting member, Board of Trustees for 1993 - 1995 Chief of Staff - elect 1993 Chief of Staff - 1994 Santa Paula Memorial Hospital, Santa Paula, CA Courtesy Staff, 1966-1995 PRESENT HOSPITAL STAFF AFFILIATION Community Memorial Hospital, Ventura, CA Honorary Staff SOCIETY MEMBERSHIPS bast and present American Association for the Advancement of Science Member American Cancer Society, Ventura County Chapter Member Board of Directors 1969 - 1972 American College of Chest Physicians Fellow American College of Surgeons Fellow Representative for Hospitals of Ventura County, California 1980 -1987 American Heart Association, Council on Cardiovascular Diseases Member American Lung Association Member American Medical Association Member American Thoracic Society Member California Medical Association Member International Cardiovascular Society, North American Chapter Member North American Society for Pacing & Electrophysiology Member 1 62 0 Samson Thoracic Surgical (Western Thoracic Surgical Association) Member 3 011, James Willard Calvin, M.D. April 15, 1997 SOCIETY MEMBERSHIPS (continued) Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery Member Society for Thoracic Surgeons Member Southern California Vascular Surgical Society Member Ventura County Heart Association Member President 1970 - 1971 Ventura County Medical Society Member Medical Review Committee 1971 - 1987 Board of Governors 1975 - 1981 President 1979 SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 1.** "Thrombophlebitis of the Lower Limb" McGill Medical Journal, October 1954 2. 'Protective Effect of Hypothermia in Cerebral Ischemia; Selective Brain Cooling in the Human" Surgery, July 1962 3.* "Renal Artery Injection in Animals" Stanford Medical Bulletin, 1963 4. 'Proximal Coronary Artery Obstruction; Trans -aortic Endarterectomy" New England Journal of Medicine, July 1964 5. "Mediastinal Biopsy of Indeterminate Pulmonary and Mediastinal Lesions" Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, March 1965 6. "Mediastinal Biopsy for Indeterminate Chest Lesions" Thorax, March 1966 7.* "Mediastinal Biopsy. The Direct Approach" The American Surgeon, January 1967 8.* "Clinical Application of Parasternal Mediastinotomy" Archives of Surgery, April 1971 9.* "Parasternal Mediastinal Exploration to Evaluate Resectability of Thoracic Neoplasms" Annals of Thoracic Surgery, October 1971 10. Comment to "Transmediastinal Permanent Ventricular Pacing" Annals of Thoracic Surgery, August 1972 11.* "Transmediastinal Approach for Permanent Cardiac Pacemaking" A movie film, April 1973 12.** Comment to "Initial Experience with Sutureless Screw -in Electrodes for Cardiac Pacing" Annals of Thoracic Surgery, August 1973 121 4 012 i 5 James W. Calvin, M.D. April 15, 1997 SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (continued) 13. Comment to "Advantages of Transthoracic Placement of Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker Electrodes" Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, January 1975 14.* "Permanent Atrial Pacing, Epicardial Approach" A movie film, July 1975 15.* "Parasternal Mediastinal Approach for Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation" Chest, September 1975 16.* "Permanent Atrial Pacing: Epicardial Approach, 'Pinch -on' Electrodes" Archives of Surgery, June 1976 17. Perfusion Lung Scan Patterns in One Hundred Patients with Bronchogenic Carcinoma" Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, August 1976 18.** "New Surgical Technique for Implantation of Heart Pacers for Control of Arrhythmia" Audio Cassette, ICU 1108 International College of Surgeons, December 1976 19.** "Thoracoscopy and Intrathoracic Extrapleural Lipoma" (Letter to Editor) Chest, January 1977 20.** Comment to "Surgical Treatment of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias" Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, April 1977 21.** Comment to "Multiorgan Scans for Staging Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Evaluation" Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, May 1977 22.** "Intraoperative Pacemaker Electrical Testing" Annals of Thoracic Surgery, August 1978 23.** "Intraoperative Electrical Testing" American College of Surgeons Clinitape Library (category: Cardiac Surgery, Pacemakers) Cat. No. 0604 (C78-PG4) October 1978 24.** "The Importance of Impedance in Pacemakers" (Letter to Editor) Chest, October 1979 25.** "Gruntzig Arterial Dilation" Journal of Ventura County Hospital, November 1979 26.** Comment to "Why Operate on Fibromuscular Dysplasia" Arch Surgery volume 115, November 1980 27.** Comment to "Complications Following Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty" American Journal Surgery, July 1981 28.* "Dilation with Gruntzig Balloon Catheter for Peripheral Arterial Disease - Initial Experience in a Community Hospital" Angiology, January 1982 * Primary author ** Solo author 122 5 01 3 ATTACHMENT 5 Michelle S. Clairmont 78-780 Castle Pines Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 Home Phone 760-564-8773 Email mclairmo@aol.com January 06, 2000 June Greek City Clerk, P.O. Box 1504, La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Greek, I believe my experience and solid record of achievement make me an ideal appointee to the Riverside County Free Library Advisory Committee. My husband and I re -located to La Quinta from Tucson, Arizona in June, 1999. My husband accepted a corporate transfer. I regretfully resigned my position with the University of Arizona Library. I have decided to stay home and raise our daughter full-time. However, the opportunity to serve on the Riverside County Free Library Advisory Committee would afford me the opportunity to continue to contribute to the Library community. I have over 10 years of Library experience. As my enclosed curriculum vitae indicates my experience includes planning, policy development and implementation at both the library and consortium levels. I have a great deal of energy and a commitment to the success of libraries. Please call me at (760) 564-8773 if you need further information about my experience and interest. Sincerely, �,. � k. ( C� _A. a E' �. ( (c:u f m-j- Michelle S. Clairmont Enc: 1 123 014 MICHELLE S. CLAIRMONT 78780 Castle Pines Drive La Quinta, California Telephone 760-564-8773 EDUCATION Master of Library and Information Studies, 1992 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Bachelor of Arts - History, Political Science, 1988 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada EXPERIENCE 1. University of Arizona, Science -Engineering Library Librarian, Science Engineering Team, November 1996 March 1999 Science -Engineering Team, member: Responsible for: • Subject specialist assigned to the following subject areas and departments: Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering; Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics; Hydrology and Water Resources; and Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences. • Provide high level, in-depth reference assistance in these subject areas • Teach research methods and provide specialised bibliographic instruction to students and faculty in my assigned departments. • Management and development of library resources, in all formats, in my assigned subject areas. • Undergraduate service contribution via service at the Science -Engineering reference desk and teaching Internet and web instruction classes. Accomplishments: • Prepared and presented a demonstration of Science Citation Index to the deans and department heads of the University of Arizona School of Engineering. • Assisted in the development of criteria and Subject Reallocation of SET • Successfully negotiated to participate in a national trial of NTIS electronic document delivery service. • Served on 5 librarian selection search committees. Two for Team Leader positions. • Assisted in creation of a Vision Statement for the Science -Engineering Team. 124 • Organised a full -day Team Building activity for Science -Engineering Team Michelle S. Clairmont Effective Meetings Subteam, member Developed and implemented plan for building team community and interdependence, and for addressing issues of ineffectiveness in meeting management. Paired reports and cluster reports increased team members' awareness of ongoing activities in the team. Work products included: improved topic summary form, improved meeting agenda chart, new mechanism for evaluating confidentiality of team issues, presentation on decision -making options. Use of these tools and techniques resulted in better preparation and more streamlined, productive meetings wherein team members are more prepared and more engaged, and work is accomplished. Identification of expected outcome and type of decision needed has led to greater efficiency, and a shared understanding of the importance of the topic at hand. Housekeeping and Administrative Activities Subteam, member As a group, we developed and implemented strategies for dealing with routine team work, establish team operating principles, and address team effectiveness issues. Coordinated operational and 1-time funding requests. Hired new temporary librarian (solicited input from team members regarding fill-in behind staffing needs; analyzed input and developed chart representing source and extent of need; estimated specific FTE requirements; wrote job description; served as selection committee). SET obtained sufficient support for temporary librarians so that team members spend more time in activities directly addressing customer needs. Acted as external liaisons when team decisions affected other teams or the Library. Developed new time negotiation worksheet to facilitate team decision -making when team members are selected for library -wide or university -wide activities. Access 2000 Team, Team Leader, July 1997 March 1999 Responsible for: • Redesign of the University of Arizona Library Information Gateway Accomplishments: With 5 member team, successfully redesigned a new University of Arizona, Information Gateway. Conducted 12 usability studies with students to design a usable system. Digital Library Initiatives Team, Member, August 1998 March 1999 Responsible for: Identify needs and opportunities for development of knowledge management projects. Design, develop and implement knowledge management tools. In addition, the incumbent has been selected by teammates to serve as the team's Strategic Work Activities Coordinator for Knowledge Management. 125 16 Michelle S. Clairmont 2. Technical University of Nova Scotia, Library Head of Information Services, 1993-1996 Responsible for: • Management and scheduling of the Reference Services department • Management of the reference collection • Management and co-ordination of Interlibrary Loans Department • Planning and organising Bibliographic Instruction Programs • Directing a staff of 2 full-time Library Clerks; I full-time librarian • Information Consultant with TUNS Library Research Service (TLRS), a fee -based information service for architects, computer scientists and engineers • Primary on-line database searcher/Researcher • Acting for the Head of Public Services in her absence Accomplishments: • Assisted in the design and establishment of a professionally staffed reference service for students, faculty and industry • Established and authored a reference department policy for all Librarians to follow • Developed a Reference Procedures Manual which includes an orientation/training plan and an extensive resource guide • Assisted in the design, planning, implementation, and promotion of the TUNS Library Research Service • Participated in a full Bibliographic Instruction Program —including both basic library orientation for new students and full research skills workshops for senior students • Reorganised the duties and training of Interlibrary loan staff to increase efficiency of service to students, faculty and other libraries 2. Technical University of Nova Scotia, Library Librarian Subject Specialist for Agricultural, Civil, Food Science, and Industrial Engineering Departments, 1993-1996 Responsible for: Development and management of the Library collection in the subject areas of agricultural engineering, civil engineering, food science, and industrial engineering Management of the acquisitions fund for the above subject areas Bibliographic and research skills instruction in the subject areas and sources specific to the above subject areas Accomplishments: • Developed Library Collection Policies for Agricultural, Civil, Food Science and Industrial 126 Engineering disciplines Michelle S. Clairmont • Assisted in composing the TUNS Library Collection Policy 3. iSTAR Internet Inc. World Wide Web Editor, Engineering subject specialist for True North, 1996-1997 Responsible for: True North is an Internet navigator arranged by subject categories. I reviewed and selected the engineering sites for the benefit and ease of use of iSTAR subscribers. 4. Technical University of Nova Scotia, Library Reference Librarian and Head of Circulation, 1992-1993 Responsible for: • Providing reference service when support staff requested it • Planning, co-ordination and direction of Circulation area • Directing and training a staff of 5 library clerks and 7 student assistants • Cataloguing monographs according to Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules • Managing the flow and deposit of all cash income for the Library • Managing CD-ROM Workstations Accomplishments: • Developed and implemented a circulation procedures manual 5. TAVEL Limited, Dartmouth, N.S. Information Systems Co-ordinator engineering consulting firm, 1991-1992 Responsible for: • Management of local area network (16 Macintosh computers) • Responsible for all company project/proposal research • Systems analysis and improvement Accomplishments: • Designed and implemented computerised business information systems • Designed and implemented a standardised technical library system • Designed and implemented a unique classification and indexing system for TAVEL's multidisciplinary material • Created a local area network access database with Boolean search capabilities 12 • Development and implementation of standardised office communications 918 Michelle S. Clairmont 6. Technical University of Nova Scotia, Library Library Clerk III, 1988-1991 Responsible for: • Ordering, receiving and invoicing monographs and serials using GEAC automated acquisitions module • Maintaining written and verbal correspondence with all library associated vendors Accomplishments: • Assisted in implementing GEAC automated Acquisitions module • Trained new staff member to work in this Technical Services department • Assisted in the MARC coding of serials for major retrospective conversion project 7. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Bayer's Road Branch, Halifax, N.S. Current Account Representative and Public Business Representative (PBR), 1984-1988; 1990-1991 (part-time and full-time while conducting formal post secondary education) Responsible for: • Advising customers of investment options and negotiating the sale of RRSP's, GIC's, Term Deposits, etc. • Attended to the daily maintenance of current accounts as a treasury officer • Responsible for daily deposits, ordering currency and clearing excesses with the Bank of Canada • Ensuring that all branch debits and credits balanced at days end HONOURS AND AWARDS Northern Exposure to Leadership participant, nominated and sponsored by Canadian Library Association, 1994 Dalhousie University Graduate Studies Fellowship Award, 1992 Student to Canadian Library Association Conference Award, 1991 Treasurer, elected life officer of Dalhousie University's graduating class of 1988 SCHOLARLY PRESENTATIONS • Clairmont, Michelle and J. Martinez, "The Virtual Environment", Internet Librarian `98 (2nd Annual). Monterey, California, November 2-5, 1998. 128 019 Michelle S. Clairmont • Martinez, Joanne and Michelle Clairmont, "Virtualing Services at the University of Arizona: A Case Study", Computers in Libraries `98 (13th Annual). Arlington, Virginia, March 1998. • Clairmont, Michelle, Ruth Dickstein and Victoria Mills, "Testing for usability in the design of new information gateway❑❑❑❑", Living the Future II (2nd Biannual). Tucson, Arizona, April 1998. • Clairmont, Michelle, Ruth Dickstein and Vicki Mills, `Design issues: testing for usability in the design of a new information gateway" presented to the MIS 441 class (System Design Issues), University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona, July, 1998. • Clairmont, Michelle, "What is Librarianship?", Canadian Association of University Teachers, Librarians Conference. Halifax, Nova Scotia, November 26-28, 1992. • Clairmont, Michelle and Sharon Murphy, "Charging into the Future: How to Plan, Implement and Market a fee -based Research Service", Atlantic Provinces Library Association Conference. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, May 25-27, 1995. • Clairmont, Michelle, "Charging into the Future: How to Plan, Implement and Market a fee -based Research Service", Nova Scotia Library Association Conference. Truro, Nova Scotia, October 13-15, 1995. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES • Member, Living the Future II Conference Planning Committee, 1997-1998 • Member, Technical University of Nova Scotia Faculty Association Executive, 1993-1996 • Novanet Library Consortium —Policy Making Committee for the 14 member University Libraries ❖ Chair, Novanet Document Delivery Working Group, 1995-1996 ❖ Member, Novanet OPAC Subcommittee, 1992-1996 ❖ Member, Novanet Circulation Subcommittee, 1988-1990; 1992-1993 ❖ Member, Novanet Bibliographic Instruction Subcommittee ad hoc, 1992-1993 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS 1. Member, American Library Association 2. Member, Special Library Association 4. Member, Canadian Library Association 6. Vice President and President, Canadian Association of Special Libraries and Information Services, a division of the Canadian Library Association, 1995-1996 12 v c&t,, 4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Consideration of Approval for the Details of the Site Amenities to be Incorporated in the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project No. 97-09 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve details of the site amenities to be incorporated in the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project 97-09, and; Authorize a budget transfer of $340,000 from the Art in Public Places (APP) Fund to the Civic Center Campus Improvement project fund. There are no direct fiscal implications at this time. The original construction was $864,250. Subsequent expenditures were authorized by the City Council for street improvements on Avenida La Fonda (directly adjacent to the Civic Center site), and for the emergency generator installation at the Senior. Center. The construction funding remaining for this project is $594,432. Funding is also available in the Infrastructure Fund and the Art in Public Places Fund for artistic features. Current funding available in the Art in Public Places Fund (Account No. 701-000-255-210) is $370,078. Current funding sources are from the Infrastructure Fund and from the Civic Center Bond proceeds. Both sources will allow non -prevailing wage expenditures; therefore, a cost savings may be realized. On August 3, 1999, the City Council approved the final Civic Center Master Plan and authorized staff to proceed with the preparation of plans, specifications and Engineer's estimate. 130 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000118a. wpd The approved Master Plan included the following amenities to be incorporated into the project: 1 . Historical Plaza 2. Entry Plazas (3 locations) 3. La Quinta Island 4. Outdoor Stage 5. Site Structures 6. Children's Garden Area 7. Desert Garden 8. Exercise Areas 9. Enhanced Paving 10. Site Furnishings 11. Site Lighting During the August 3, 1999, City Council Meeting, the City Council reviewed the options for the Master Plan of the Civic Center Campus. The City Council chose Master Plan Concept I and directed staff to meet with the Cultural Arts Commission to discuss artistic site amenities. On December 9, 1999, staff met with the Cultural Arts Commission, to obtain project input. During this meeting, the Cultural Arts Commission made a motion and voted unanimously to commit $340,000 in funding to the project for artistic features and amenities. It was also requested by the Commission and the artist, Mr. Louis DeMartino (creator of the art piece "THE SUN AND MOON BEAM", previously scheduled for placement in the Civic Center), to place the art in the open area to the south and east of the lake. During the City Council meeting of December 21, 1999, the City Council received written correspondence from the Rotary Club of La Quinta requesting a kiosk on the new Civic Center Campus project. A copy of that letter is included as Attachment 1. The City Council referred this matter to staff to provide additional details. Staff and the design Consultant have reviewed potential locations. After discussion with a representative from Rotary, staff has learned that the Rotarian's request meant they wished to sponsor the construction of a kiosk or an appropriate rest stop location on 13 the campus where they would also be allowed to place a Rotary emblem plaque. Staff TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2000\000118a.wpd 002 has determined, that at the discretion of the City Council, there may be several rest stop locations from which to choose. Included with this report as Attachment 2 is a booklet depicting each of the previously mentioned features with additional details not seen in the previously approved Master Plan. The following is a list of the features, including those features proposed to be incorporated into the project by the Cultural Arts Commission (*) and the Community Services Commission (**): 1. Historical Plaza • proposed bronze relief map of the City (*) • benches(*) • proposed location for Mitchell Paige honor (*) • proposed future entry for City Hall expansion • rose garden • linear water features • enhanced paving (*) • drinking fountain (*) 2. Entry Plazas (typical at 3 locations) • pilasters with urns • citrus trees • benches(*) • date palms • enhanced pavers (*) 3. La Quinta Island • Gazebo (* ) • lush foliage • "y" configuration walking path • turf area • bridges (2), artistically enhanced railing (*) 4. Outdoor Stage • proposed shade canopy • 40' by 20' raised concrete "story teller" type stage, in a semi -circle configuration 5. Site Structures • picnic shelters, proposing (2) octagonal configuration, with 3 picnic tables each • shade structure (typical at various locations) 132 003 TAMDEMCOU NCIL\2000\0001 18a. wpd 6. Children's Garden Area • topiary figures and forms • interactive/jumping water feature (*) • play equipment (* *), booklet does not represent actual equipment • hop scotch pattern in adjacent walk path (*) 7. Desert Garden • native plants and shrubs in desert setting • proposed full scale statuaries of native wildlife (*) • native wildlife tracks in adjacent concrete walk path (*) 8. Exercise Areas • 3-4 stations proposed; leg lift, inclined board, push-up bar, stretching rail (**) 9. Enhanced paving • at plaza locations • walk path • dancing footsteps imprinted in concrete walk path (*) 10. Site Furnishings • benches(*) • trash receptacles (*) • picnic tables 11. Site Lighting • proposed bollard style at walkways and plaza locations, not as depicted in the booklet but similar to those on Hwy 111 frontage at Eagle Hardware • proposed accent lighting in the tops of date palms at entry plazas At this time staff is requesting that the City Council provide direction in regard to the amenities. In the future, staff will present sample color schemes as they apply to the various approved amenities, for consideration by the City Council. Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve details of the site amenities to be incorporated in the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project 97-09, and; authorize a budget transfer of $340,000 from the Art in Public Places (APP) Fund to the Civic Center Campus Improvement project fund; or 2. Do not approve details of the site amenities to be incorporated in the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project 97-09, and; authorize a budget transfer 133 of $340,000 from the Art in Public Places (APP) Fund to the Civic Center ` TAMDEMCOUNCIU2000\000118a.wpd t 1 0 4 $340,000 from the Art in Public Places (APP) Fund to the Civic Center Campus Improvement project fund; or 3. Do not approve details of the site amenities as presented, to be incorporated in the Civic Center Campus Improvement Project 97-09, and; do not authorize a budget transfer of $340,000 from the Art in Public Places (APP) Fund to the Civic Center Campus Improvement project fund; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, fp(L hris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Rotary Club Letter 2. Project Site Amenities (12 pages) 134 G0 5 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCI L\2000\000118a.wpd WRITTEN CORRESPONDENWITfAf4,HMJNT 1 November 20, 1999 City of La Quinta Calle Tampico &. Washington Streets La Quinta CA 92253 Attention: Honorable Mayor Pena And Council members I am writing on behalf of the Rotary Club of La Quinta. • NOV 2, 41 T CITY OF to�Jlid to CITY G.1kr:AGEI 'S„GEPT.� „M RECEIVED NOV 3 0 1999 The Rotary club has an interest in having a permanent presence within the city. Our board of directors would like to have you consider allowing us to have a "kiosk" or other type of structure in the new area between city hall and the senior center. Each year Rotary provides thousands of dollars in scholarships within the community and one of the things we would like to establish is some type of permanent place to record these names. The. Rotary club would cover any costs related to "personalizing" the structure or site. Thank you for your consideration. Your y, eg Shanno ,President Rotary Club of La Quinta 74041 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (760) 836-3377 800-338-9895 • FAX (760) 836-3379 135 .t '- 'v t ATTACHMENT 2 J, t. r , -UrA t 1 111' 1 t i I ' )1•t Y. . 4!: l: p. ryyr l f. / 1• M 1 7 117 r Y' ..41 �s�;•4 i. f'i 3 r� *T�l-,TV t� 3 rV��\�\��\\ 'A', - N tr t 1 'it 7 4+ IP' r i j�,, ,r � �. w axle" �{ >•tf � -�,, t• � z� �� ; �^�j + � 'fir ♦ "'Q+:'�.. i a IE i= raw 'h ? - a s- S`� 1� t y K 146 147 v""� .•y �D Rf Ci E• b ca 0 H H ccn po - 0 y bo 0 cc Lxi 0 p, `:•• � O •O vi � o u y cis v � � 0. w > bo -n U o u �, bo o u y v ?� .b � A b p" ca .b u co �+ o 9 >, 0 0 •+ v p 1-4 �. Q p ca g > v o 0� .> u u a y y >, 0 (U bo o bo u�' �' ~v a o`er obx ,'0 bco 0 ab a - b 0 0 tkO 0 a�a>�� w �°'�.n >,W� o�'tia cis 1-4 ci O" E: pp c°� $ ..>~. v Q � a�i G v v ate, o v o '� V j ' v ,u O\ bo y W �" L�r ca , U ''� 4r • H w C"r .t"-. 3Qr .�,y Cd O u L7 0 bD 24 o b o a H w � o `� x a s a cc a v �. a� cc v oO 'C 2 .0 o b'w cao p`a cao U bo v a `' bbo bo a 41 cap o oo G a w a ' uz 0 8� cc � >, bo aa >u, cn v `n , c~a u U p tko h Ln u a' V w tl '� h F~, cc >, 4° � 3 > cis, w 0 ca ao ¢' 0 0 u i �i u 0 0y u °1 r� b °J 01 0• a`"ictl y o • ^' 0 Cua ai 0 Q �' y > • ^' .y. F as bo . �" >, Q\ A "� U w � .t7 ,p .0 ca •'�" ' � >, gal N 0 ►--, ca c., O ?: >' m 3 u . �. .�. 4 0 a� aoi v >, w 0 °> >, " 0 6-4 o cis a0i ca cs � a a c.. z u • ^ a`ai "" a h -° '°pp o , o 0 w k. .� `era' o o u u O 0 0 bo w .� 'C C u o >, o a) u tx. a0i o x . y ¢� ° h v a p, • ^' J H 0D $ O p' ►�. U .o •= CO «, 0 o cn �a 3 H 40. �' w a °�' F° 05 > eo u °� v , o u °' p oo i o � 'a c° 3 .s O ' ' W �'7 h O � �, d b� y . 0 CIS '� 5 '' a+r 'C • � `'� U 0 .G 0 N co = 0 o bo q u.o p,p,W�•� C b c. oa > a°J a w ti v 3 c�.� U3 ;� Cd bbO 0 a h ,� p y ��' bll y 7 E� a; cd -O a cisc y r'„ �~ �� 0. chi) ,�, O c~a °� ►oi o ca ~ 0 �" d �: 0 u CD .., C Cp ca �" 4i .q p 4: U A m r� . + c�, .. ca O C „ o ��, y >, a�i (~i >, O cui ycaj .,0. % ►`ri N ca ca zj> 'C v 9". V) -+ ca ca a. > C y bo 4•+ cc w F. 1-4 a y x w 4U,., ca m� 0 O> N u a� cn 0 0 0 V Co ca 41 ca U u nx a"a 3 75A 0U i °.r C7 �B o Z'J H W14 V) N Q y 41 Ubo 1.4 80 bo C 4!r. b O ram+ y y Ca 3 r, o C,3 ►� a � 0 co 0 .0 ,b y Q Li 0 • ca p N ,� 0 °. cc �0� Co CIS 0 „u3'a3 0 vas a Vca u p— Ma v — p u u W cn cl u h a ' w d y u Cn O ,, 43 ° p0 Q4 $ �bo 0 - �. o ° «. pq ^� aj 0 a ca 3 d . boa > ti v 0 a a ,N .0 -- o o •C ~� ca a+ \� " " o ° cc C ^�' �>1 Tom. (Ubo ^ -� cc'��•• C°° �p u1 V3F1 >, •�woN, mo o woy va N uo.b Nbo Nv3 �MWboo ►•a r Ac�c 0> �>, Nu v •0 cc �'o a, N o.° 0 a b c r4 Cab ca u a 0�-4 evi r. ca V. ca I= �bbo ap w >, �, ca 5 u ti ��'� vt2 u-000 ca v w ^.•. c4,3 y h CD -0 C`r 0 V 1 0 O Co 0 1••••1 bo -C � 'C CO ^' 0 .0 �+ 00- (4 .O 0 �O 0 bo �Ha bo bo u u v 0 3.� u cc EON -� cc � w° a c° �7 ;- 3 C—S 4u o v cc ca u boo a u 0 ar. w ca N N b u �+ N u 0 (U 'C �cis.�� ca — — --- 14 T4tyl 4 4Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: Consideration of a Resolution Supporting Proposition 12 (The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000) and Proposition 13 (The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act) RECOMMENDATION: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 12 (The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000) and Proposition 13 (The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Passage of Propositions 12 and 13 will provide more than $4 billion statewide in funding for a variety of projects and programs for parks, open space, wildlife habitat, coastal protection, flood control and watershed conservation. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On December 6, 1999, the Executive Committee of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) approved a resolution in support of Proposition 12 (The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000) and Proposition 13 (The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act). CVAG is requesting that all member jurisdictions adopt a similar resolution (included within this report). The California Legislature approved Proposition 12 (the Park Bond) and Proposition 13 (the Water Bond) for placement on the March 7, 2000 primary election ballot. Upon voter approval, the measures will provide more than $4 billion statewide for 149 various park, water, and air quality programs. Passage of the Propositions would result in significant funding opportunities for the Coachella Valley. Proposition 12 (the Park Bond) would authorize the issuance of $2.1 billion in general obligation bonds to finance capital investment in park, recreational, cultural, historical, fish and wildlife, lake, riparian, reservoir, river, and coastal resources. Although most of the funding will be competitive statewide, the Park Bond calls for two per capita funding programs totaling $388 million for local agencies and $200 million for grants to local agencies in highly urbanized areas (the Roberti-Z'berg- Harris program). For the City of La Quinta, this would translate into an estimated $266,438 (Attachment 1). Some of the funding is earmarked for specific projects/agencies, e.g. $5 million for the Salton Sea restoration and $5 million for the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. According to Cal -Tax (a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting taxpayers), passage of the Park Bond will not cause a tax increase. Payments will be made over 20 to 25 years from existing revenues in the State General Fund (Attachment 2). Proposition 13 (the Water Bond) would authorize the issuance of $1.97 billion in general obligation bonds for safe drinking water, water quality, flood protection, and water reliability programs. Proposition 13 proposes to create accounts for and fund the following programs: Safe Drinking Water Flood Protection Watershed Protection Clean Water and Water Recycling Water Conservation Water Supply, Reliability, and Infrastructure TOTAL $ 70,000,000 $ 292,000,000 $ 468,000,000 $ 355,000,000 $ 155,000,000 $ 630,000,000 $1,970,000,000 The funds in each category would become available generally through a competitive process, however, funds would also be available through local assistance grants and loans. In addition, some of the funds would be earmarked for specific projects/agencies, e.g. Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds, CALFED Bay Delta Program. CVAG has provided a document that assesses Propositions 12 and 13 with respect to habitat conservation in Southern California (Attachment 3). It identifies sources of funds in the two bonds and outlines criteria for accessing those funds, as well as the lead agencies responsible for allocating and disbursing the funds. 150 002 CVAG staff was unable to provide information on which Valley cities have adopted resolutions in support of the two measures. Any pertinent information City staff is able to obtain will be shared during the Council meeting. Copies of Propositions 12 and 13 (bill text) can be found in the City Manager's Office and are available upon request. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 12 (The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000) and Proposition 13 (The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act); or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting the Propositions; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ViaCasilla , Mana ent Assistant Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Prop 12 Estimates of Per -Capita Grants Programs 2. Memo from Cal -Tax on Proposition 12 Fiscal Impacts 3. Habitat Conservation Funding Opportunities 151 003. RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 12, THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 2000 AND SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 13, THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION, AND FLOOD PROTECTION ACT WHEREAS, California's population is expected to increase by more than 18 million in the next 30 years; and WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta is committed to meeting the parks, recreation, and wildlife conservation needs of this growing population and its economy; and WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta recognizes that water supply and delivery, water quality, flood control, urban and regional parks, open space, wildlife habitat and watershed protection are an essential component of a sustainable economy and healthy environment and these are benefits that can be enjoyed by all Californians; and WHEREAS, public funding for these benefits is essential and has not been available in any substantial amount since 1988; and WHEREAS, Governor Davis and over two-thirds of the California Legislature have placed Proposition 12 (The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000) and Proposition 13 (The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Act) on the ballot for March 7, 2000, providing more than $4 billion in much needed voter -approved bond funding for these purposes; and WHEREAS, these measures will also provide a critical source of funds.to match local and private contributions for regional multiple species conservation planning programs supported by the land jurisdictions of the Coachella Valley; and WHEREAS, these measures will also provide a critical source of funds for projects that will actually increase California's water supply and add greater flexibility and reliability to the State's existing water infrastructure system; 152 �n� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA supports the passage of Propositions 12 and 13 on March 7, 2000, and considers the public education and ballot campaign for these measures to be a high priority. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, this 4tn day of January 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PERA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 153 nn'.' i ATTACHMENT 1 DRAFT Prop 12 Estimates of Per -Capita Grants Programs DRAFT For planning purposes only. - The populations for districts are not available. Agency eligibility and overlapping populations will be determined by spring of 2001. 1/1/1999 Population Per-Captia II Agency Estimates RZH Per Capita Small Cities Total Rate - Allocation Rate - Allocation Rate - Allocation PLUMAS COUNTY CENTRAL PLUMAS R.P.D. $0 $6.25 $0 $0 $0 INDIAN VALLEY R.P.D. $0 $6.25 $0 $0 $0 PLUMAS COUNTY 20,450 $0 $4.00 $150,000 $0 $150,000 PORTOLA 2,100 $0 $6.25 $30,000 $0 $30,000 County Total $180,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BANNING 25,300 $0 $6.25 $158,125 $2.70 $68,310 $226,435 BEAUMONT 10,850 $0 $6.25 $67,812 $2.70 $29,295 $97,107 BEAUMONT-CHERRY $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 BLYTHE 20,950 $0 $6.25 $130,938 $2.70 $56,565 $187,503 CALIMESA 7,650 $3.30 $25,245 $6.25 $47,812 $2.70 $20,655 $93,712 CANYON LAKE 11,850 $0 $6.25 $74,062 $2.70 $31,995 $106,057 CATHEDRAL CITY 36,750 $3.30 $121,275 $6.25 $229,688 $2.70 $99,225 $450,188 COACHELLA 22,200 $3.30 $73,260 $6.25 $138,750 $2.70 $59,940 $271,950 COACHELLA VALLEY $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 CORONA 117,300 $3.30 $387,090 $6.25 $733,125 $2.70 $316,710 $1,436,925 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 15,400 $0 $6.25 $96,250 $2.70 $41,580 $137,830 HEMET 61,100 $3.30 $201,630 $6.25 $381,875 $2.70 $164,970 $748,475 INDIAN WELLS 3,410 $3.30 $11,253 $6.25 $30,000 $2.70 $9,207 $50,460 INDIO 44,500 $3.30 $146,850 $6.25 $278,125 $2.70 $120,150 $545,125 LA QUINTA 21,750 $3.30 $71,775 $6.25 $135,938 $2.70 $58,725 $266,438 LAKE ELSINORE 29,300 $0 $6.25 $183,125 $2.70 $79,110 $262,235 LAKE ELSINORE R.P.D. $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 MORENO VALLEY 139,100 $3.30 $459,030 $6.25 $869,375 $2.70 $375,570 $1,703,975 MURRIETA 41,550 $0 $6.25 $259,688 $2.70 $112,185 $371,873 NORCO 25,500 $3.30 $84,150 $6.25 $159,375 $2.70 $68,850 $312,375 PALM DESERT 36,300 $3.30 $119,790 $6.25 $226,875 $2.70 $98,010 $444,675 PALM SPRINGS 42,900 $3.30 $141,570 $6.25 $268,125 $2.70 $115,830 $525,525 PERRIS 31,550 $0 $6.25 $197,188 $2.70 $85,185 $282,373 RANCHO MIRAGE 11,400 $3.30 $37,620 $6.25 $71,250 $2.70 $30,780 $139,650 RIVERSIDE 254,300 $3.30 $839,190 $6.25 $1,589,375 $0 $2,428,565 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1,473,300 $2.20 $3,241,260 $4.00 $5,893,200 $0 $9,134,460 SAN JACINTO 25,250 $3.30 $83,325 $6.25 $157,812 $2.70 $68,175 $309,312 TEMECULA 48,850 $0 $6.25 $305,312 $2.70 $131,895 $437,207 VALLEY WIDE R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 County Total $20,970,430 SACRAMENTO COUNTY ARCADE CREEK R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 ARDEN MANOR R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 ARDEN PARK R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 CARMICHAEL R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 CITRUS HEIGHTS 88,300 $3.30 $291,390 $6.25 $551,875 $2.70 $238,410 $1,081,675 CORDOVA R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 ELK GROVE C.S.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 FAIR OAKS R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 FOLSOM 48,250 $3.30 $159,225 $6.25 $301,562 $2.70 $130,275 $591,062 FULTOWEL CAMINO $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 GALT 17,200 $0 $6.25 $107,500 $2.70 $46,440 $153,940 ISLETON 850 $0 $6.25 $30,000 $2.70 $2,295 $32,295 MISSION OAKS R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 NORTH HIGHLANDS R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 ORANGEVALE R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 SACRAMENTO 396,200 $5.15 $2,040,430 $6.25 $2,476,250 $0 $4,516,680 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 1,177,800 $2.20 $2,591,160 $4.00 $4,711,200 $0 $7,302,360 SOUTHGATE R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 SUNRISE RPD $3.30 $408,111 $6.25 $2.70 WINDEMERE R.P.D. $3.30 $0 $6.25 $0 $2.70 $0 $0 County Total $13,678,012 California State Parks - Local Services Section [1999-12-15] Page 9 J 154 007 uI i Cat r,Tax ATTACHMENT 2 Eatablt�Md t 926 To: California Park and Recreation Society From: Steve Kroes, Vice President, California Taxpayers' Association Subject: Proposition 12 Fiscal Impacts The California Taxpayers' Association (Cal -Tax) supports Proposition 12, the Parks, Water, and Coastal Protection Bond Act on the March 7, 2000 ballot. This bond would provide $2.1 billion in funding for needed improvements to local and state parks and conservation projects. Cal -Tax endorses Proposition 12 because it is fiscally responsible, it does not raise taxes, and it pays for projects that are important for all Californians. Parks are an important component of California's quality of life. Eleven years have passed since the last state bond funds were approved for park improvements. State general obligation bonds like Proposition 12 do not cause a tax Increase. Payments on the bond wiJI be made over 20 to 25 years from existing revenues in the state general fund. The passage of a bond merely commits the Legislature to make these bond payments one of their -highest budget•priorities as they allocate funds. Proposition 12 will require about $140 million a year in debt payments — this is about 0.2 percent of next year's projected general fund budget. This small'fraction is a reasonable amount to pay for investing In important facilities that will benefit future generations. It is important that California fund these types of projects while the economy and the state budget are strong. California Taxpayers' Association is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting taxpayers from unnecessary taxes and promoting efficient, quality government services. CALIFORNIA TAXPAYER$' ASSocIAnON 1715 K Street, Suite 1250 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • (916) 441-0490 fax (916) 441-1619• htrpJ/www.caltax.org 15J 008 ATTACHMENT 3 October 6, 1999 Habitat Conservation Funding Opportunities in Proposition 12 (AB 18/N1147 The "Park Bond") 58 and Proposition 13 (AB 1584 The "Water Bond") Prepared by The Nature Conservancy For Interested Stakeholders in the Southern California NCCP Planning Region Overview 7 On March 1,9 2000, California voters will consider Proposition 12 and Proposition 13, two measures providing more than $4 Billion stateti}ode in funding for parks, open space, wildlife habitat, coastal protection, flood control and watershed conservation, among other objectives. This document assesses the two measures with respect to opportunities for funding habitat conservation in Southern California. It identifies sources of funds in the two bonds and outlines criteria for accessing those funds, as well as the lead agencies responsible for allocating and disbursing them. These bonds contain hundreds of millions of dollars potentially accessible by projects including those pursuant to approved NCCPs and those that are not part of an approved NCCP. Funding in the two measures is distributed among a number of widely diverse categories. Most of the funding in the bonds is competitive statewide. There are two direct earmarks for NCCP (see the assessment of Proposition 12 below). In addition, there are numerous categories for which habitat acquisitions and restorations in the region are eligible. Authorization of funding for habitat conservation in these "statewide" categories is frequently described in the legislation -in ways that make NCCP acquisition projects strong candidates for approval. There is absolutely no reason to assume that projects in areas without approved plans cannot access significant funding. In fact for many categories, not having an approved NCCP could be an advantage. Early polling for the two measures has been positive. There appears to be solid majority support for both measures, but there are many factors that can influence the outcome of the election in March. A strong`and active campaign is the only way to ensure that the measures will pass and the funding will be available. Project -Driven Funding The park and water bonds work by setting up categories of funding. All funding, even that earmarked for NCCPs, must be approved by the legislature. Funds are accessed by proposing projects, most often with agency partners, for which money is then appropriated. Nearly all categories of funds available to southern California in both bonds are competitive, meaning that they may be petitioned for by any project that qualifies. The process is not that different than the annual budget process, except that there are large sources of funding dedicated to habitat conservation and the projects don't have to compete with other state General Fund priorities like they must do in the normal annual budget. The stakeholders of NCCP must therefore take an extremely active and assertive role in identifying and assembling projects, developing proposals, and obtaining support in the agencies and the legislature for their proposals. In other words, the key to obtaining funding is to energetically work the project proposal and funding process. Many categories of funds are authorized in very different terms than the stakeholders in NCCP are used to describing or promoting their projects. For example, some are categorized as "pollution prevention" while others are focused on "flood and erosion control' or "urban parks and open space." In every case, habitat conservation can bean important element of a successful project. It is up to the project proponents to creatively fit their needs into the funding categories 151 available. We must also work together closely and collaboratively as a region and with the agencies to maximize funding opportunities for evervone and minimize Proposition 12, The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Air, Clean Water and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (The Villa ra igosa-Keeley Act) This measure would provide $2.1 Billion in funding for urban and regional parks, wildlife habitat, recreation, cultural and historical resources, riparian, reservoir and coastal resources. The following are the categories of funding relevant to Southern CA regional habitat conservation efforts. They are identified along with the Section of the measure in which they appear. Not including the per capita and Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris funds (both subject to local discretion), there is $333,200,000 available for habitat conservation in Proposition 12. The final total will be the amount ultimately appropriated to projects by the legislature: see Project -Driven Funding above. [NOTE: The total amounts in each category below include only those funds potentially available to Southern California regional habitat conservation projects and do not include earmarks for other programs. Therefore, the total in each category may be less thanthe amount allocated to the category in the actual legislation.] Section 5096.310 (h) S10,000,000 To the Department of Fish and Game for improvement, acquisition and restoration of riparian habitat or lands in close proximity to rivers and streams Section 5096.310 (q) S5,000,000 To the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy Section 5 096.3 10 (v) S2,000,000 Remove nonnative vegetation harmful to ecological reserves in San Diego County Section 5096.323 State Parks S50,000,000 To State Parks Dept. To acquire lands that are a high priority for both the state park system and for habitat conservation. Priority will be given to projects in an NCCP approved before 1/l/99, if the acquisition is in conjunction with the NCCP. If the acquisition is not part of an NCCP, or in an area without an approved plan, the acquisition may be approved on its own merits by the legislature in the budget statute. Acquisitions may be for either NEW or existing state parks. Section 5096.350 Wildlife Conservation Program $232,000,000 From the total allocation of $265,500,000 to the Wildlife Conservation Board. These funds will be appropriated until spent. They include: $10 million for acquisition or restoration of riparian habitat and watershed conservation programs $40 million for acquisition of threatened and endangered species habitat to promote recovery of those species. No funds are available for actions pursuant to an NCCP permit. If the acquisition is not part of an NCCP or is in an area without an approved permit (no permitting benefits are specifically authorized due to the acquisition), the legislaturemay approve the acquisition on its own merits through the budget act. .j t $82.5 million to match funds contributed by federal or local agencies or nonprofits for acquisition, restoration, or protection of habitat or corridors that promote recovery of threatened and endangered or fully protected species. Same idea as directly above - no funds persuant to an NCCP permit. As long as no development or permitting benefits are asssociated with the acquisition, the legislature may approve the funds. $100 million for acquisitions subject to an NCCP plan adopted before 111199. If a proposed acquisition is either not part of an NCCP or is in an area without . an approved plan, the legislature may approve the acquisition on its own merits through the budget act. Section 5096.352 Coastal Protection Program S33,700,000 From a total allocation of $220,400,000 to the California Coastal Conservancy. These funds will be.appropriated continuously until they are spent. Including: $12 million either directly or as grants from the Coastal Conservancy to local governments or non -profits for acquisition, development, rehabilitation, restoration, enhancement, and protection of property, or other actions that benefit fish and wildlife. ($800,000 of those funds earmarked.to restore the'arroyo chub, partially armored stickleback and southern steelhead to the San Mateo Creek watershed in Orange County). $21.7 million of the Coastal Conservancy funds are unallocated and unspecified in the measure and the authorizing legislation. Section 5096.336 Local Parks S338,000,000 Total statewide allocation for local grants. This is distributed to local governments based on population. The funds are at the discretion of local cities, counties and park districts for acquisition, development, improvement, rehabilitation, restoration, enhancement and interpretation of local park and recreational lands, including facilities transferred to local governments due to closing of military facilities. There will likely be local competition for these funds at the Jurisdictional level for active recreation projects and other uses; nevertheless these funds are at the discretion of local governments and can be used for acquisition of the type of "regional parks" that multi -species plans create. Section 5096.310 (g) Roberti Z'Berg-Harris Urban Open Space Program S200,000,000 Total statewide allocation for grants to cities, counties and park districts for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation and restoration of park and recreation areas and facilities pursuant to this program. As with the Per Capita account, there will be local competition for these funds. But this money is also ultimately at the discretion of local governments. 1.50 n� Proposition 13, The Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection and Flood Protection Act of 2000 This measure would provide $1.97 Billion in funding for safe drinking water, water quality, flood protection and water reliability programs. The following are the categories of funding relevant to Southern California habitat conservation efforts. They are identified along with the Section of the measure in which they appear. It will require creativity in assembling projects and proposals to meet the criteria in some of these categories. Regional habitat conservation programs are eligible for categories of funding in Proposition 13 totaling $392,500,000. The final amount will be the total ultimately appropriated to projects by the legislature: see Project -Driven Funding — above. [NOTE: The total amounts in each category below include only those funds potentially available to Southern California regional habitat conservation projects and do not include earmarks for other programs. Therefore, the total in each category may be less than the amount allocated to the category in the actual legislation.] Chapter 5, Article 2.5, Section 79036 and 79037 Flood Protection Corridor Program S70,000,000 To the Department of Water Resources for flood control projects through direct expenditure or grants to local agencies or non -profits for acquisition, restoration, enhancement and protection of property for flood control, wildlife habitat protection and agricultural preservation. Includes easements. Priority given to projects assigned high priority by the Department of Fish and Game for wildlife habitat or restoration purposes. Chapter 6, Article 1, Section 79076 Watershed Protection Program ' S54,000,000 Dedicated to Southern California of $90 million total statewide to implement watershed plans. Water Resources Control Board provides funds for acquisition to reduce flooding, control erosion, improve water quality, restore stream flows and protect watersheds and riparian zones. Matches federal grant programs. Grants limited to $5 million per project but no limit on number of projects per watershed. Specific eligibility for habitat protection for aquatic and terrestrial species. May fund the components of a watershed plan that implement species recovery plans. Chapter 6, Article 4, Section 79101 River Protection Program S82,500,000 Available upon direct appropriation by the Legislature to projects that protect, protect, restore or enhance river systems and riparian areas. 60% of funds must be spend near major metropolitan areas. Program is described in Article 6 (beginning with section 78682) of Chapter 6 of Division 24. Chapter 7, Article 2, Section 79113 Non Point Source Pollution Control Program $100,000,000 Available to projects that implement non -point source pollution control. A minimum of 60% of the funds are restricted to six Southern California counties (5-county region plus Ventura). Grants are made by Water Resources Control Board to local agencies or non -profits. Maximum grant of $5,000,000 per projects application, but no limit on number of local grants..Projects must be a recognize part of a non -point source control program. Twenty percent local match required 013 of recipient for largest grants. Chapter 7, Article S, Section 79148 Coastal Non Point Source Pollution Control Program S86,000,000 To Water Resources Control Board for projects that restore and protect water quality and environment of coastal waters, estuaries, bays, and near shore surface and ground waters. Maximum grant of $5,000,000 but no limit on number of projects in an area. Any project that will make improvements in water quality along coast is potentially eligible, including habitat protection and easements in coastal watersheds. Any project that helps reduce runoff, erosion or pollution is eligible. Local match of 20% may be required on larger grants. There are a number of additional sources of funds in Proposition 13 that are of less direct relevance to habitat conservation efforts in the region. However, it is possible that projects can be developed that will allow access to some of those funds as well. I�l T4'!t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution in Support of "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" Initiative and Legislation avellielliTAVIDIA1 • AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" Initiative and Legislation. None for this action. l•i' /_1394", 11 • 0 None. At the December 21, 1999 City Council Meeting, the Council received Written Correspondence from Taxpayers for Fair Competition ("Taxpayers") regarding an upcoming initiative and that group's request for the City to support the initiative by passing a resolution (Attachment 1). The purpose of the pending legislation, according to Taxpayers, is to protect cities' flexibility/ability to hire outside engineers and architects. Taxpayers asserts that as a result of a recent Supreme Court decision, "local governments are in jeopardy of losing this [contracting] flexibility." Taxpayers is seeking support from the City in the form of a resolution supporting the initiative and legislation to protect the ability of the state and local governments to contract with outside engineers and architects. This issue first came about in 1998 when a trade/industry group known as the Professional Engineers in California Government (PECG) brought forward Proposition 16 224 which would have prevented government use of private sector architects and engineers. After the defeat of Proposition 224, PECG sued Caltrans to block usage of outside architects and engineers. The Supreme Court sided with PECG in a 1999 decision (PECG v. Caltrans). This initiative has been drafted to amend the California constitution to remove restrictions on contracting out for architecture and engineering services. The initiative basically guarantees the right of local governments and the State to contract out for architectural and engineering services. Sufficient signatures have been gathered to place the initiative on the November 2000 ballot; however, the signatures have not, as of this date, been verified by the Secretary of State. Staff contacted the League of California Cities ("League") and was informed that the League did oppose Proposition 224; however, the League Board has not taken a position on the upcoming initiative. The Board is scheduled to meet in mid -January and it is anticipated. that the results of that meeting will be known by the January 18th City Council Meeting. Conceivably, the League may take a similar position as they did with Proposition 224. The City previously took action on Proposition 224 in May 1998, adopting a resolution indicating the City's opposition to the proposition. Further background information, including a list of cities and others supporting the pending legislation, is included within Attachment 1. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" Initiative and Legislation; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution supporting "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" Initiative and Legislation; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. R tfully ub itt Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst City Manager's Office pp v for submi n Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 Correspondence from Taxpayers for Fair Competition /� CAMyData\WPDa \CITY COUNCIL\CCSTFFTAXPAYERSFORFAIRCOMPRESOLUTION 01-18-2000.wpd 16 3 0 `' RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE AND LEGISLATION WHEREAS, California's population growth has resulted in the demand for more than $90 billion worth of highway, school, prison, flood control and other infrastructure improvement projects; and, WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract with the private sector for architectural and engineering services has never been greater; and, WHEREAS, a series of successful lawsuits by a group of employees at Caltrans has resulted in effectively banning the state from contracting with private engineers and architects; and, WHEREAS, a recent, unanimous, appeal court decision has extended the ban on contracting out specifically to school districts threatening severe delays in building badly needed schools; and, WHEREAS, in order to stop the Caltrans engineers' continuing effort to prevent the state and local government from utilizing private engineers and architects, an initiative known as "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" has been prepared; and, WHEREAS, "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" changes California's laws and allows the state and local governments to contract with private companies for architectural and engineering services; and, WHEREAS, "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" will save California's taxpayers money by encouraging competition between state employees and the private sector; and, WHEREAS, "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" requires architecture and engineering contracts to be subject to standard accounting practices and requires financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. 164 0 (l Resolution 2000- January 18, 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City of La Quinta hereby supports "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" for architectural and engineering services as an initiative and legislation. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of January 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney C:\MyData\WPDocs\RESOLUTIONS\FAIRCOMPETITIONTAXPAYERS 01 -1 8-2000.wpd 165 004 ATTACHMENT 1 ❑ 111 Anza Boulevard, #406 - Burlingame, CA 94010 - 650-340-0470 - FAX:650-340-1740 ❑ 11300 W..Olympic Boulevard, #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064 - 310-996-2600 - FAX:310-996-2673 -®— December 6, 1999 Dear Local Government Official: I am writing about an issue that is restricting the ability of local governments to contract with private engineers and architects. What is the situation and what can be done about it?. Basically, a group of Caltrans employees won a California Supreme Court lawsuit preventing government use of private sector architects and engineers. Their successful lawsuit (PECG v. Caltrans) essentially accomplished the same thing their 1998 initiative attempted. That initiative — Prop. 224 — was opposed by more than 150 cities, including the League of California Cities, and was soundly defeated by the voters last June. Traditionally, local government agencies have always had the option to choose when and where to use private consultants. As a result of the Supreme Court and other legal decisions, local -governments are in jeopardy of losing this flexibility. Local government entities are either canceling contracts with private A&E firms, or simply choosing not to enter into such contracts. For example, the Port of Long Beach recently canceled an $800,000 contract with a private survey firm. A lawsuit was filed this May to terminate private sector A&E contracts on the San Francisco Airport expansion project and turn that work over to public employees. The City of San Diego and the East Bay MUD have also cancelled contracts with private firms. lentil we do something, the threat to local government entities will continue to grow. The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act amends California's constitution to correct this problem. We are asking your City Council to support this common sense measure. This initiative would overturn the damage done by the Caltrans lawsuit and simply allow state and local government the choice and authority to contract for private A&E services if they so choose. Recently more than one .million signatures were submitted to the Secretary of State's office in order to qualify the initiative for the November 2000 b Iot- 166 006 That is why we are asking your Council to act now in joining the more than 70 cities and counties that have voted to support the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act For your information, enclosed please find a recent analysis by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority which has taken a support position regarding the initiative. Also, enclosed is a sample resolution and support form. Please fax the appropriate form to (650) 340-1740 so we can add your Council to our growing coalition. You may have received a mailing from a group calling itself Californians Opposed to School & Road Delay. This campaign committee is organized by the Professional Engineers in California Government (PECG) whose members are mostly Caltrans engineers. This mailing contains some wild and inaccurate claims about the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act. Enclosed is a fact sheet, which explains the FACTS about the initiative and legislation. If you have any questions or need more information, please feel free to call Jason Barnett at (650) 340-0470. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, im'm Jason Barnett 167 007 SAMPLE RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT" INITIATIVE & LEGISLATION WHEREAS, California's population growth has resulted in the demand for more than $90 billion worth of highway, school, prison, flood control and other infrastructure improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the need for state and local governments to contract with the private sector for architectural and engineering services has never been greater, and WHEREAS, a series of successful lawsuits by a group of employees at Caltrans has resulted in effectively banning the state from contracting with private engineers and architects; and WHEREAS, a recent, unanimous, appeals court decision has extended the ban on contracting out specifically to school districts threatening severe delays in building badly needed schools; and WHEREAS, in order to stop the Caltrans bureaucrats' continuing effort to prevent the state and local government from utilizing private engineers and architects, an initiative known as "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act changes California's laws and allows the state and local governments to contract with private companies for architectural and engineering services; and WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act will save California's taxpayers money by encouraging competition between state employees and the private sector; and WHEREAS, the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act requires architecture and engineering contracts to be subject to standard accounting practices and requires financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, SUPPORTS "The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act" for architectural and engineering services as an initiative and legislation. Contact Title City State Zip Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail address Please fax completed form to 650-340-1740. Questions? Call 6501340-0470. 168 Mi x Support Form ❑ 111 Anza Boulevard, #406 - Burlingame, CA 94010 - 650-340-0470 - FAX:650-340-1740 ❑ 11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064 - 310-996-2600 - FAX:310-996-2673 04 -_ I / We support the Taxpayers for Fair Competition legislation and initia- tive allowing state and local governments to hire private architectural and engineering firms to design important infrastructure for transportation, schools, prisons and water projects. You may add my/our name to your coalition list. Organization Name Date Authorized Signature Printed Name Mailing Address City, State, Zip Phone E-Mail Address FAX Please FAX completed form to Jason Barnett at (6S0) 340-1740 THANK YOU! .. 169 10/28/99 - B 009 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY COMMISSIONERS: Hon. Julie Fierce, Commissioner October 14, 1999 Charles M. Abrams Contra Costa Transportation Authority Chair 1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 150 Millie Greenberg Vice -Chair walnut Creek, CA 94596 Irma Andersor Subject: Information Concerning the Prospective Impact of the CELSOC "Fair Competition and Jane Bartke Taxpayer Savings" Initiative, in Response to Statements Made by "Californians Joe Canciamilla Opposed to School & Road Delay" ' Ron Enzweiier Dear Ms. Pierce: Donald Freitas r Donna Gerber Thank you for your inquiry regarding the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings" initiative, and related statements made by the campaign against the subject CELSOC initiative. Based on Federal Glover the most recent information, this measure will appear on the November, 2000 ballot. Regarding Julie Pierce the specific issues raised by "Californians Opposed to School and Road Delay," which you have Hermann Welm referenced, we have reviewed the materials provided and discussed with counsel statements made that the initiative will interfere with the local contracting process, and claims of significant Rooert K. McCleary Executive Director project delay. The following information is provided in response to your inquiry. As you know, the Authority has taken a position supporting the CELSOC initiative. Support was based on the belief that the proposed constitutional change would provide an opportunity for enhanced project delivery, and is necessary to give the California Department of Transportation; as well as agencies such as ours, maximum flexibility in availing themselves of the appropriate mix of public and private resources to expedite project delivery. As we understand the drafters' intent, the purpose of the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings" Initiative is quite simple. Building on existing law as it applies to local agencies, the initiative would embed in the constitution the authority and flexi ili for both state and local agencies to contract with the private sector for engineering and architectural services, utilizing a qualifications -based, open and fair competitive process. While local agencies currently have that authority in most cases, a primary purpose of the initiative is to give the state such flexibility — which it currently lacks as a result of the 1997 Supreme Court PECG decision against Caltrans. The PECG decision severely limits Caltrans ability to contract out for engineering services (and could potentially limit the ability of local agencies to contract for such services for state highway projects). The decision was based on 60 years of case law, which had expanded a simple constitutional requirement for a state civil service system into a mandate largely prohibiting 134C Treat Boulevard contracting out for services within state government. Suite 150 Walnut Creek CA 94596 PHONE: 9251938.3970 0 FAX: 9251938.3993 rt1;:/iwww.ccta.net 010 Hon. Julie Pierce October 14, 1999 Page 2 In response to claims of the opponents, our legal counsel has noted that the drafters' have indicated that it was their intent to incorporate current requirements for local contracting into the new text, but to do so in plain English and in a politically palatable manner. Counsel has indicated that the new provisions do not impose any substantive new requirements. and in fact leave implementation of contracting procedures to local agencies. Counsel doubts that passage of the initiative will result in any change in the way local agencies solicit and award contracts for engineering and architectural services. If passage of the initiative resulted in litigation seeking to bar its implementation, cities and counties would default to existing procedures. Accordingly, we do not see the risk of litigation (which would likely come from opponents to the initiative) as implicating any delay or interference with the delivery of local projects. The major beneficiaries of the initiative would, in fact, be state and local governments. By building into the law the flexibility to contract out work — to deal with special services needs, peak workloads, time -sensitive project delivery workloads, and similar factors — Caltrans' ability to deliver critical projects will be enhanced. Local agencies will also gain the flexibility of being able to use local or state and federal funds to retain private engineering services for state highway work, in order to expedite project delivery. The risk that the courts of this state might expand to local agencies the current restrictions on contracting out would also be foreclosed. The initiative would allow freedom of choice to local agencies, because the initiative does not mandate or require contracting out — it only provides constitutional protection for its permitted use. Thank you your inquiry concerning the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings" Initiative. I hope that the foregoing discussion has provided useful information regarding some of the arguments and issues surrounding the ballot measure. Please call if there is any additional information that we can provide. Sincerely, ;Ro4bert ' K. McCleary Executive or cc. Authority Members Stan Taylor, Authority Counsel 171 Oil The FACTS About The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act Recently the Professional Engineers in California Government — primarily made up of Caltrans engineers — distributed a letter dated September 2S, 1999 to local government agencies using the name "Californians Opposed To School & Road Delay" on the Fair Competition and Taxpayers Savings Initiative. Here is the truth about the initiative! PECG Claim - "In taking a position on this measure, it is important to keep in mind that the CELSOC initiative is completely unnecessary. Local governments already have complete authority to contract out without state restrictions." FACT: More than 65 cities and counties already supyort this initiative because they believe it is important to protect their ability to deliver public ;vorks projects. Local governments ARE being challenged on their use of contracting under the PECG v. Caltrans decision. In September of this year an appeals court unanimously decided to essentially prohibit the San Francisco school district from contracting with private firms for A&E work. The appeals court specifically cited PECG v. Caltrans. Just one week after that appeals court decision on schools, the Port of Long Beach canceled an S800,000 contract with a private firm. Earlier this year, a lawsuit was filed to terminate private sector A&E contracts on the San Francisco airport expansion and turn that work over to public employees. The East Bay MUD has also cancelled 4 private contracts. PECG Claim - "The CELSOC initiative would wipe out all existing local government contracting procedures and require the development, approval and imposition of new states 'de contracting practices on local governments and districts." FACT: There is nothing in the initiative that repeals the existing qualification -based selection provisions of Title 1, Division 5, Chapter 10 of the Government Code commencing with section 4525. Further, the terms "fair, competitive selection process" are specifically defined in the initiative's section 4525.12. The inclusion of the phrase "competitive selection process" is specifically defined in the initiative to require the inclusion of four elements including (1) a prohibition that government employees may not participate in the selection process if they have a financial interest; (2) inclusion of a procedure to comply with laws regarding political contributions; (3) inclusion of a procedure to comply with laws regarding conflict of interest; and (4) inclusion of a procedure to comply with laws regarding unlawful activities. Existing Government Code section 4526 includes three of the four requirements under current law. The fourth requirement is simply that contracting agencies must comply with existing laws regarding political contributions. 17C Taxpayers for Fair Competition 111 Ania Boulevard, Suite 406 • Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 • Fax: (650) 340-1740 11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 • Los Angeles, CA 90064 • (310) 996-2600 Fax: (310) 996-2673 PECG Claim - "The initiative actually restricts the ability of cities to contract out for private architectural and engineering services." FACT - The initiative is very clear. It states in Section 3 "The State of California and all other governmental entities, including but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, shall be allowed to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and engineering service for all public works of improvement." "Nothing contained in Article VII of this Constitution shall be construed to limit, restrict or prohibit the State or any other governmental entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, from contracting with private entities forthe performance of architectural and engineering services. That's why MORE THAN 65 CITIES AND COUNTIES SUPPORT The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act. Supporters include city councils from large cities such as Oakland and Fresno and other cities throughout California from Eureka to Poway. 173 Oil LOCAL PUBLIC -PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: A HISTORY OF SUCCESS, A FUTURE AT RISK Many local governments and local agencies have successfully used contracting for architecture and engineering services as a way to get the job done in a fast, cost-effective fashion. Often this has meant bringing in projects for less money and in less time than Caltrans own estimate to do the job. Here are a few of those local success stories: History of Success ........................................................ Santa Clara County Transportation Au- thority In 19 Itq\W. 4 County 8 , Santa Clara Cou voted a half -cent increase in the sales tax to improve traf- fic conditions on three local highways. Caltrans initially estimated it would take 17 years for the work from start to fin- ish. The Authority then created a public - private partnership, which did the work in 10 years, at a savings of hundreds of millions of dollars. Orange County The design and construc- tion of the county's toll \ roads is being handled by } a private contractor. Against comparable Caltrans projects, the private contractor spent 10 percent less on management costs -- brought in the project 6 percent ahead of schedule, instead of 16 percent behind for Caltrans — and kept cost growth down 12 percent compared to Caltrans. Santa Barbara County A tale of two highways points up the difference between Caltrans and the private sec - for here. A series of projects to make improvements on US 101, being delivered by Caltrans, is at least a year be- hind schedule, and further delay seems likely. On the other hand, a project to make im- provements on Route 154 was delivered on time and under budget by a private contrac- tor. Contra Costa County Through the use of pri- vate sector contractors, the county transportation authority was able to bring in a program of improvements on State Route 4 six to nine months ahead of the pro- jected Caltrans schedule. Source: 'Meeting Califomia's Infrastructure Challenge: Assuring Cost -Effective and Timely Project Delivery. Prepared by the California Taxpayers' Association and the Califomia Chamber of Commerce — May, 1999 A complete copy of the report may be obtained by calling Taxpayers for Fair Competition at (650) 340-0470 9/29/99 Taxpayers for Fair Competition 111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 - Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 • Fax: (650) 340-1740 11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064 - (310) 996-2600 Fax: (310) 996-2673 .®- 174 014 All that could be a thing of the past however. Already, the state is virtually prohibited from contracting out for I architecture and engineering services, thanks to a series of lawsuits brought by state -employed engineers (mostly Caltrans employees). Now that ban is beginning to limit the choices available to local governments as well. Future AtRisk .................................................................... Statewide (seismic very different if filed today, given the 1997 Supreme Court decision. retrofitting work) Oakland While California has many of the world's leaders in the field of seismic safety, if 'One high visibility project in Oakland. they don't work for Caltrans (which most ..is design of the 1-880 BroadwaylJack- of them don't) — they won't be working for son interchange improvements. To keep us. In fact, more than 20 contracts for this project on schedule may require out - seismic retrofitting work with private sector experts have al- side transportation engineering service ready been cancelled. to supplement Caltrans' staff. San Francisco A lawsuit has been filed to terminate pri- vate sector architectural and engineer- ing contracts on the San Francisco Air- port expansion and turn that work over to public employees. The costs and time delays of such a step would be staggering. The prece- dent for other local government entities is clearly alarming. Lancaster "If projects such as the Avenue L and Av- enue H Bridge Widening projects had to be designed by the State, they would be delayed indefinitely. In order to maintain local control over pub- lic works projects and to maintain the abil- ity to design and construct projects in a timely manner, staff recommends" support of the Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act. City of Lancaster Staff Report June 8, 1999East Bay MUD East Bay MUD At least three sector contracts have al- ready been canceled by East Bay MUD due to the threat of a public employee \ lawsuit. Central Coast Water Authority PECG filed a lawsuit in 1995 (prior to the Supreme Court decision) seeking to stop DWR from entering into an agreement with the Central Coast Water Authority to build and operate a pipeline extension. The local water agency hired a private firm to perform the necessary design work. PECG lost that suit, but the outcome would most likely be Thus it is important to ask the voters to change the State Constitution -to permit contracting out.' City of Oakland Analysis June 16, 1999 San Diego The City Attorney in San Diego has told the city that any future contracting out should be done under the conditions set forth under the decision in PECG v. Caltrans — conditions which make contract- ing out next to impossible. The City Attor- ney reasoned that there were enough simi- larities between the State Constitution and San Diego's City Charter, as to make the court decision ap- ply to the city as well. School Construction In September of this year, an appeals court essentially prohibited the San Francisco school district from contracting with private design firms. The appeals cour specifically cited PECG v. Caltrans in their decision. Can other sc ool districts be far behind? Port of Long Beach One week after the appeals court de- � cision, the Port of Long Beach can- celed a close to $1 million surveying contract; without even the threat of a lawsuit. Clearly, more and more gov- emment entfties will see the handwnY- ing on the wall. They will be afraid to enter into contracts or will even can- cel contracts to avoid litigation with an obvious o come— no contracting outas long as PECG v: CaltraAs ( J remains in place. 01 5 ❑ 111 Anza Boulevard, #406 - Burlingame, CA 94010 650-340-0470 - FAX:650-340-1740 ❑ 11300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 - Los Angeles, CA 90064 310-996-2600 - FAX:310-996-2873 640_ WHO SUPPORTS "THE FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS ACT"? Legislation and Initiative (as of 12/6r99) California Chamber of Commerce California Taxpayers' Association California Business Roundtable Coalition for Adequate School Housing Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3 (AFL-CIO) Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 12 (AFL-CIO) American Subcontractors Association, California Chapter Structural Engineers Association of California Western Growers Association National Federation of Independent Business Associated General Contractors Californians for Better Transportation California Building Industry Association California Minority and Women's Business Coalition California Manufacturers Association California Business Properties Association Civil Justice Association of California California Groundwater Association Coalition for Project Delivery California Chapter, American Planning Association California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors, National Association 176 016 Statewide Organizations (cont.) California Cement Promotion Council California Contract Cities Association California Trucking Association California Park & Recreation Society California Fence Contractors Association California Taxpayer Protection Committee Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association Western States Petroleum Association California Travel Parks Association Alliance of California Taxpayers and Involved Voters Responsible Voters for Lower Taxes United Californians for Tax Reform Local and Regional Organizations Waste Watchers Contra Costa Taxpayers Association Kern County Taxpayers Association League of Placer County Taxpayers Butte County Citizens for Better Government Orange County Taxpayers Association* San Diego County Taxpayers Association Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association Shasta County Taxpayers Association PA Local & Regional Organizations (cont.) Sonoma County Taxpayers Association Bay Area Council Industry Manufacturers Council San Francisco Chamber of Commerce Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Hollywood Chamber of Commerce Mid Valley Chamber of Commerce Irvine Chamber of Commerce Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce Milpitas Chamber of Commerce Salinas Valley Chamber of Commerce , Simi Valley Chamber of Commerce Greater San Diego Chamber of Commerce Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce Downey Chamber of Commerce Greater Tulare Chamber of Commerce Modesto Chamber of Commerce Newport Harbor Area Chamber of Commerce 177 017 Local & Regional Organizations Local Government (cont.) (cont.) City of Colfax Northern California Engineering City of Cotati Contractors Association City of Arcadia North Coast Builders Exchange City of Emeryville Orange County Business Council City of Orland Orange County Transportation Coalition City of Livermore City of Kerman San Leandro Chamber of Commerce City of Highland San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of City of Claremont' Commerce City of Dublin Santa Barbara County Association of Governments City of Lancaster City of Camarillo Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group* City of Campbell Southern California Contractors Association City of Morgan Hill City of Loma Linda Local Government City of Westminster City of Oakland City of Bellflower* City of Irvine City of Fontana City of Newport Beach City of Vallejo City of Del Mar City of Angels City of Garden Grove City of Rohnert Park City of Richmond City of Belvedere City of Palm Springs City of Ft. Bragg City of Ontario City of Ceres City of Fresno City of Chino Hills* City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Novato City of Pasadena City of Arroyo Grande City of Watsonville City of Clayton City of Belmont City of Daly City 178 01R Local Government (cont.) Local Government (cont.) City of Millbrae Town of Tiburon City of Exeter City of Visalia* City of Poway Arcata City Public Works Department City of Sebastopol Nevada County City of Laguna Hills City of Corcoran Kings County City of Gridley Lake County City of Temecula Kern County City of Winters Humboldt County City of Santa Rosa City of Los Banos Madera County City of Concord Mono County City of Fortuna Santa Cruz County City of Sunnyvale* Sonoma County City of Lodi Siskiyou County City of Hermosa Beach City of Livingston Stanislaus County Town of Windsor Sunline Transit Agency City of Gardena Live rmore/Amad or Valley Transit District City of Carpenteria Metropolitan Transportation City of Eureka Commission* City of Saratoga Contra Costa Transportation Authority City of San Juan Capistrano Lake County Flood Control & Water City of Tulare Conservation District City of Taft Apple Valley Heights County Water City of Santa Clarita District City of Ukiah" City of Santa Cruz Elsinore Water District City of lone Los Alisos Water District 4 179 019 Local & Regional Organizations (cont.) San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District South Tahoe Public Utilities District Westborough Water District Heritage Ranch Community Services District Vista Irrigation District Lake County Sanitation District Ironhouse Sanitary District Education Clovis Unified School District Alum Rock School District Downey Unified School District Encinitas Union School District Fresno Unified School District Redding School District San Juan Unified School District Vacaville Unified School District West Fresno School District Engineering and Architectural Organizations Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of Califomia American Institute of Architects, California Chapter s Engineering & Architecture Organizations (cont) Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers Engineering and Utility Contractors Association Engineering and General Contractors Association Bay Counties Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors Association Placer County Architects, Geologists, Engineers and Land Surveyors Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers, Greater LA Chapter Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Legislation only at this time. 1S0 020 The Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Initiative for Architectural and Engineering Service 1. Permits Contracting Out of Architectural and Engineering Services: Allows state and local governments, special districts and school districts to contract with private companies for architectural and engineering services. Defines such services as architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land surveying and construction management. 2. Local Choice to Deliver Transportation Projects On -Time: Gives local governments greater control over transportation improvements so that highway, bridge and transit projects can be delivered on -time and within budget. 3. Competitive Selection and Taxpayer Safeguards: • Prohibits government employees from awarding contracts if they have a financial or business relationship with the companies involved. • Requires compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of interest or unlawful activities. • Subjects all architecture and engineering contracts to standard accounting practices. • Permits financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. 4. Strict Design and Construction standards: Already established project seismic safety, project design and construction standards are not changed by the initiative. 5. Only Applies to Architectural and Engineering Services: This measure does not apply to any other contracts except for architecture and engineering services. For example, it does not apply to peace officers, teachers or correction officers. 4/14/1999 181 Taxpayers for Fair Competition 111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 406 • Burlingame, CA 94010 Phone: (650) 340-0470 • Fax: (650) 340-1740 1.1300 W. Olympic Boulevard, #840 • Los Angeles, CA 90064 • (310) 996-2600 Fax: (310) 996-2673 •41- 0 FAIR COMPETITION AND TAXPAYER SAVINGS INITIATIVE SECTION 1. TITLE. This measure shall be known and may be cited as the "Fair Competition and Taxpayer Savings Act." SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the intent of the people of the State of California in enacting this measure: (a) To remove existing restrictions on contracting for architectural and engineering services and to allow state, regional and local governments to use qualified private architectural and engineering firms to help deliver transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other infrastructure projects safely, cost effectively and on time; (b) To encourage the kind of public/private partnerships necessary to ensure that California taxpayers benefit from the use of private sector experts to deliver transportation, schools, water, seismic retrofit and other infrastructure projects; (c) To promote fair competition so that both public and private sector architects and engineers work smarter, more efficiently and ultimately deliver better value to taxpayers; (d) To speed the completion of a multi -billion dollar backlog of highway, bridge, transit and other projects; (e) To ensure that contracting for architectural and engineering services occurs through a fair, competitive selection process, free of undue political influence, to obtain the best quality and value for California taxpayers; and (f) To ensure that private firms contracting for architectural and engineering services with governmental entities meet established design and construction standards and comply with standard accounting practices and permit financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. SECTION 3. Article )MI is hereby added to the California Constitution to read: § 1. The State of California and all other governmental entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties, cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, shall be allowed to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and engineering services for all public works of improvement. The choice and authority to contract shall extend to all phases of project development including permitting and environmental studies, rights -of -way services, design phase services and construction phase services. The choice and authority shall exist without regard to funding sources whether federal, 18 �; 0001 state, regional, local or private, whether or not the project is programmed by a state, regional or local governmental entity, and whether or not the completed project is a part of any State owned or State operated system or facility. § 2. Nothing contained in Article VII of this Constitution shall be construed to limit, restrict or prohibit the State or any other governmental entities, including, but not limited to, cities, counties. cities and counties, school districts and other special districts, local and regional agencies and joint power agencies, from contracting with private entities for the performance of. architectural and engineering services. SECTION 4. Chapter 10.1 is hereby added to Division 5 of Title 1 of the Government Code to read: § 4529.10. For purposes of Article XXII of the California Constitution and this act, the term "architectural and engineering services" shall include all architectural, landscape architectural, environmental, engineering, land surveying, and construction project management services. § 4529.11. All projects included in the State Transportation Improvement Program programmed and funded as interregional improvements or as regional improvements shall be subject to Article XXII of the California Constitution. The sponsoring governmental entity shall have the choice and the authority to contract with qualified private entities for architectural and engineering services. For projects programmed and funded as regional improvements, the sponsoring governmental entity shall be the regional or local project sponsor. For projects programmed and funded as interregional improvements, the sponsoring governmental entity shall be the State of California, unless there is a regional or local project sponsor, in which case the sponsoring governmental entity shall be the regional 'or local project sponsor. The regional or local project sponsor shall be a regional or local governmental entity. § 4529.12. All architectural and engineering services shall be procured pursuant to a fair, competitive selection process which prohibits governmental agency employees from participating in the selection process when they have a financial or business relationship with any private entity seeking the contract, and the procedure shall require compliance with all laws regarding political contributions, conflicts of interest or unlawful activities. § 4529.13. Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to change project design standards, seismic safety standards or project construction standards established by state, regional or local governmental entities. Nor shall any provision of this act be construed to prohibit or restrict the 0002 authority of the Legislature to statutorily provide different procurement methods for design -build projects or design -build -and -operate projects. § 4529.14. Architectural and engineering services contracts procured by public agencies shall be subject to standard accounting practices and may require financial and performance audits as necessary to ensure contract services are delivered within the agreed schedule and budget. § 4529.15. This act only applies to architectural and engineering services defined in Government Code section 4529.10. Nothing contained in this act shall be construed to expand or restrict the authority of governmental entities to contract for fire, ambulance, police, sheriff, probation, corrections or other peace officer services. Nor shall anything in this act be construed to expand or restrict the authority of governmental entities to contract for education services including but not limited to, teaching services, services of classified school personnel and school administrators. § 4529.16. This act shall not be applied in a manner that will result in the loss of federal funding to any governmental entity. § 4529.17. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. § 4529.18. If any act of the Legislature conflicts with the provisions of this act, this act shall prevail. § 4529.19. This act shall be liberally construed to accomplish its purposes. § 4529.20. This act seeks to comprehensively regulate the matters which are contained within its provisions. These are matters of statewide concern and when enacted are intended to apply to charter cities as well as all other governmental entities. SECTION 5. This initiative may be amended to further its purposes by statute, passed in each house by roll call vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, and signed by the Governor. SECTION 6. If there is a conflicting initiative measure on the same ballot, which addresses and seeks to comprehensively regulate the same subject, only the provisions of this measure shall become operative if this measure receives the highest affirmative vote. 10 0003 024 T4ht 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Consideration of Recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award Program RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 3 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Select the City of La Quinta recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award provides an opportunity to recognize and honor outstanding seniors throughout the Coachella Valley. The City Council is being asked to select one outstanding senior recipient who meets the following criteria: the honoree should be at least 70 years old; reside in the City of La Quinta; demonstrate involvement in community affairs for a lengthy period of time; and personify a healthy and active attitude and lifestyle. The Senior Center Supervisor has provided the names of two candidates, Beverly Montgomery and Fred Wolff, who meet the criteria for the award. A brief synopsis for each candidate is provided as Attachment 1 . The "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Awards Luncheon will be held on Wednesday, April 5, 2000. 185 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Select the City of La Quinta recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award; or 2. Provide staff with alternate direction. Resp-LCtfully s�bmitted, II Dodie Horvit;�nmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. 2000 Living For Your 90's Suggested Recipients 186 002- S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.023.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 2000 LIVING FOR YOUR 90's SUGGESTED RECIPIENTS Beverly Montgomery 78-483 Calle Huerta La Quinta, CA 92253 Telephone: 564-3317 DOB: 1929 Age:71 Beverly Montgomery has been a resident of La Quinta for 20 years. She was an original member of the La Quinta Ambassadors Group of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, served on the City Incorporation Task Force, was a Charter President of Soroptimist International of La Quinta, and has served as a volunteer and member of local clubs and organizations including Alternatives to Domestic Violence, Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley - La Quinta Site, the La Quinta Historical Society and the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Beverly has always been active in local organizations and believes in doing for others, especially for those less fortunate. She loves living in La Quinta and is proud to have been here when the City of La Quinta was chartered. Fred Wolf P.O. Box 1016 La Quinta, CA 92253 564-4070 Age: 70+ Fred Wolff retired to La Quinta in 1980, but was a regular visitor to the area since 1949. Before his retirement, Fred had been a high school teacher, Los Angeles County Consultant, Community Action Project Director and California State Director of Migrant Education. After retirement, Fred formed a Task Force for Incorporation, wrote the feasibility study and led the effort which made La Quinta a city in 1982. He was the first mayor and served on the City Council for four years. Fred also worked with others to conceive an image for the newly formed city as a cultural center of the Coachella Valley. He solicited funds from major business leaders to form the La Quinta Arts foundation and initiated the first La Quinta Arts Festival in 1983, now ranked number three in the nation. He chaired an ad hoc committee to develop a city hillside ordinance to protect surrounding mountains from development, installed a city to city exchange program with a Czechoslovakian village and organized a community group to promote the construction of the Fritz Burns Park municipal swimming pool. He has served 14 years on the board of directors and as president of the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition. He is proud and happy to have been part of the process of La Quinta becoming a city. 187 UJ r T4ht 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Consideration of Community Park North Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: In the 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Project 199913 (18 Acre Park Site at Westward Ho Drive/Adams Street) is identified with an allocated budget of $225,000, as provided in Attachment 1 to seek professional services to provide a master plan concept and design documents to develop the Community Park North site. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Design Development Report and Master Plan On June 1, 1990, the City of La Quinta's Redevelopment Agency purchased 18.66 acres on the northeast corner of Adams Street and Avenue 46 (renamed Westward Ho Drive) for $933,000 for the purpose of developing a park site. In October, 1992, Purkiss-Rose-RSI presented a Design Development Report on Community Park North, as provided in Attachment 2. The name Community Park North was given to this project for identification purposes only. On December 1, 1992, the City Council conducted a study session to discuss the Community Park North (park site), at which time staff recommended that the design presented by Purkiss Rose-RSI be processed through the Design Review Board and Planning Commission, as outlined in Attachment 3. On January 19, 1993, the City Council accepted and approved the Design Development Report and Master Plan for the Community Park North, as provided in Attachment 4. Recent Developments and the Need for a Master Plan Update In the 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program, Project 199913 (18 Acre Park Site at Westward Ho Drive/Adams Street) is identified to seek professional services to provide a master plan concept and design documents to develop the Community Park North site. Although the Master Plan component of this CIP project has been completed and approved, the City Council may modify the amenities found at the park site, through a Master Plan update given recent developments pertinent to the park site. • At the September 21, 1999 Redevelopment Agency meeting, an agreement was signed with Century Crowell Communities to remove excess dirt from the park site. It was determined that approximately 107,000 cubic yards of fill would be removed, therefore providing a cost savings to the City when the site is developed. As conditions of the agreement with Century Crowell Communities, a study complying with all necessary archeological requirements to complete grading at this site, development of the site rough grade and stabilization of the disturbed area to the City standard must be completed. The archeological study will provide a cost savings to the City during the design drawing process. • On October 5, 1999, the Redevelopment Agency entered into an agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) to convey a 25,500 square foot well site to the District per a prior agreement, at the park site. This well site is located on the east side of Adams Street approximately 1 /8 mile north of Westward Ho Drive. The well site on this property will need to be incorporated into the Master Plan of this park. • The Community Services Commission reviewed the approved Master Plan at the December 13, 1999 meeting. The Commission is making the following recommendations for City Council consideration: Remove: Pond and stream feature Tennis Courts (there are eight tennis courts across the street at the High School site that are available during non - school hours) Add: Skate Park Dog Park Additional Soccer Fields Par Course 180 002 • There have been informal discussions regarding a fire station to be located at the Community North Park site. Per Attachment 5, the Riverside County Fire Department has requested a minimum of two acres at the southwest corner of the property (Corner of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive) or as second priority, the northwest corner of the property. This site has not been identified on the current Master Plan. Mr. Steve Lang, of Purkiss-Rose-RSI, the Project Manager of the Community Park North Master Plan has recently stated that the addition of the well site and possible fire station, along with any changes in amenities that the City Council may desire can be incorporated into a Master Plan update. Once the Master Plan is revised pursuant to City Council direction at this meeting, a Request for Proposals for plans, specifications and engineer's estimates can be solicited. The plans, specifications and engineer's estimates will incorporate any construction phasing the City Council may determine. It is anticipated that the plans, specifications and engineer's estimates can be completed with the allocated budgeted amount*. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a Community Park North Master Plan update; provide staff with direction on revisions to the current Master Plan; and authorize staff to draft a Request For Proposals to seek professional services for construction bid documents of the current Master Plan; or 2. Do not approve a Community Park North Master Plan update; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Rp.pecifully s ie Horvifz, jCdNmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: / I f Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 190 003 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.021.wpd Attachments: 1 . Capital Improvement Program Project #199913 2. Design Development Report, October 1992 3. City Council Minutes of December 1, 1992 4. City Council Minutes of January 19, 1993 5. Letter Dated December 13, 1999, Riverside County Fire Department * Cost plans, specifications and engineer's estimates are based on development of 18.66 acres at a cost of $120,000 per acre and does not include design cost of Community Center or other amenities. 191 004 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.021.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Project: 199913 - 18 Acre Park Site at Westward Ho Drive/Adams Description Seek Professional Services to provide a master plan concept and prepare design documents necessary to develop the City's 17-acre Community Park site located Revenue Amounts Category FY 1999/00 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 Other: Quimby 225,000 225,000 Other: 0 Revenue Total: 225,000 0 0 0 0 _225,000 t_x ense Amounts Category FY 1999/00 FY 2000/01 FY 2001102 FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 Total Administration • 25,000 25,000 Engineering 175,000 175,000 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Other: Masterplan 25,000 25,000 Other: 0 Expense Total: 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000 (ln—nfinn C`_ncte Category FY 1999/00 FY 2000/01 FY 2001/02 FY 2002/03 FY 2003104 Total General Fund Other: 0 0 Operating Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: 19 Printed: 19-Mar-99 5 V 5 ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REPORT COMMUNITY PARK NoRTH CITY OF LA QUINTA PURKISS•ROSE-RSI OCrOBER 1992 ,on uj6 .nmunity Park North ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council John Pena ........................................... Mayor Stan Sniff .................................... Mayor Pro-Tem Dale Bohnenberger ............................. Councilmember Kristy Franklin ................................. Councilmember William Rushworth ............................. Councilmember Community Services Commission Sharon Kennedy .................................... Chairman Larry Best .................................... Vice Chairman Aldine Dickens ................................. Commissioner Susan Francis ................................... Commissioner Nancy Ward .................................... Commissioner Betty Jo Seaton ................................. Commissioner Jill Thompson .................................. Commissioner City Administrators Thomas P. Genovese ........................ Acting City Manager Clint Bohlen ....................... Parks & Recreation Manager Consultant Steven Lang .................................. Purkiss•Rose-RSI 194 Uij Communitv Park North TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................. 1 Authority..................................... 1 Purpose ...................................... 2 Background ................................... 2 Methodology .................................. 2 Vicinity Map .................................. 4 Site Description ................................. 5 Master Plan ................................... 6 Design Development .......................... 7-14 Overview/Design Concept Grading Off -Street Parking Pedestrian Access Sponsfield Restroo►n /Concession Court Areas Picnic Facilities Play Area Water Features Amphitheater Restroom Communitv Center Landscape Improvements Park Sign Possible Environmental Impacts ........................ 15 Opinion of Probable Costs ............................ 17 Phasing Program ................................... 19 UJ8 Community Park North EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purkiss-Rose-RSI is pleased to present the Final Master Plan and Design Development Report (DDR) describing the recommendation development program for Community Park North. We have successfully solicited and maintained citizen participation in the planning process so that all issues were clearly defined and thoroughly discussed as part of the plan preparation. The final Master Plan reflects a development scope and arrangement of facilities that represents the consensus of the public meetings combined with professional input from staff and the consultant team. The Master Plan was also presented to the Community Services Commission for their review, input and approval. This presentation completes the development planning process. The next step is to define the actual scope of initial improvements, confirm funding allocations and initiate the preparation of Phase I construction plans and specifications. Prior to any Council action committing the City to actual construction, it will necessary to process a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance. This process includes an assessment and review of environmental impacts which will most likely result in a negative declaration. The City of La Quinta is facing a growing responsibility as it proceeds with the development process for creating a comprehensive park system to serve all existing and future residents of the community. With La Quinta's changing demographics and anticipated growth, it is indeed timely that the City is updating the City -Wide Recreation Master Plan. The Master Plan for Community Park North has been influenced by the public survey findings associated with the community -wide Master Plan. Since it is the only community park site in the northern sector of the City, its importance in satisfying recreation needs for this area is significant. AUTHORITY On September 3, 1991, the City of La Quinta entered into an agreement with Recreation Systems, Inc. to furnish park planning and landscape architectural services.for the design and development of Community Park North. The scope of contracted services involved the preparation of conceptual studies, preliminary development plan, final Master Plan and a Design Development Report for the park site. In its February 1992 acquisition of Recreation Systems, Inc., Purkiss-Rose-RSI committed to complete this contract with no change in project manager, scope or fee. 1 Community Park North PURPOSE The DDR is an association of planning functions composed specifically to meet the needs of the public agency in processing the initial design of a park area or special facility. Its purpose is to establish a concept plan that depicts the recommended development of a specific site and/or special facility and to establish a realistic phasing program that fulfills primary needs and is as consistent as possible with financing resources. The plan is prepared in graphic form to allow for citizen, administrator, board member, and elected official to participate effectively on decisions regarding scope, function, priorities and design concepts. The DDR presents concepts of use; describes functional aspects of the design; investigates methods of implementation; describes potential environmental impacts; and promotes community understanding and support for the program. BACKGROUND Community Park North was acquired for park purposes by the City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency in 1988. The acquisition was initiated and processed in accordance with the City ordinance implementing the Quimby Act. The Quimby Act (Government Code of the State of California, Section 66477) allows local government to exact land dedications in lieu of fees, or a combination of both, for park and recreation purposes as a condition prior to approving a final subdivision or parcel map. With continued residential development in the northern section of the City, it has become a priority to identify the intended development of the community park and generate an economic phasing strategy to produce a long-term unified park project that has the support of the immediate and City-wide community. METHODOLOGY The provision of park and recreation facilities is a people -oriented program. Successful implementation requires public support and involvement. The City and the consultant agreed that community public meetings held near the park site would be a good avenue to invite citizen participation in the planning process. Over 3,000 flyers were sent to citizens in the north section of the City inviting them to participate in the planning process. Likewise, public notices were placed inviting participation from citizens throughout the City. The first meeting was held May 21, 1992 at a community church at the corner of Miles Avenue and Adams Street, just north of the park site. Approximately 60 people attended, most of whom resided in the north part of town. At this meeting, the design process was explained, including the role of the public input in the program and facility development. A brief site analysis of the park site was presented along 2 197 ulo Community Park North with related slides. Specific concerns from citizens were voiced and noted and a list of potential recreation activities that should be considered in the park was developed. Using these lists of concerns and desires, Purkiss-Rose-RSI prepared concept studies indicating various combinations of proposed improvements within the park boundaries. These concepts were presented at the second public meeting on June 11, 1992. This meeting was well attended by approximately 45 interested citizens, most of whom had attended the previous session. The four concepts presented were well discussed with the consensus favoring multi -use sports fields; a community center building; a passive picnic area with amphitheater and water feature; group and family picnic facilities; lighted tennis and basketball courts; and a children's play area. At the June 29, 1992 Community Services Commission meeting, Purkiss-Rose-RSI presented two preliminary development plans which represented a refinement of the favored conceptual plans from the previous community meeting. Plan #2 was favored by the Commission with some modifications. On July 13, 1992, Purkiss-Rose-RSI presented our preliminary development plan which included the comments received from the previous Commission meeting. Revisions included adding a 60-car parking area along the Adams Street frontage to provide more parking to serve the Community Center and ballfield complex. A more formal terraced amphitheater as suggested by staff was incorporated into this plan. The final Master Plan, cost estimates and draft Design Development Report was presented to the Commission at their September 28, 1992 meeting. The Commission gave a unanimous approval of the Master Plan and DDR as presented. They recommended proceeding ahead for City Council review and approval. 3 198 vl 190 Community Park North SITE DESCRIPTION The 18.6 acre park site is located in northern La Quinta on the northeast corner of the future intersection of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive (formerly 46t' St.) The undeveloped site consists of rolling sand dunes with scattered native vegetation. Elevations on the site range from 55 to 105 feet with the natural slope directed eastward. The higher elevations provide an impressive panoramic view of the desert basis and dramatic mountain range to the south. There is a dense stand of tarmarix along the east boundary of the park. An existing residence and golf driving range is located east of the park site. North of the park site is planned for a residential development of single family homes with backyards backing up to the park. There are some grading impacts on the park site associated with this northerly residential development. The home pads are positioned from 6' above to 15' below the existing grades at the park site. However, the majority of the north residential boundary is near level and graded to daylight into existing park grades. The southern boundary of the park is defined by the extension of Westward Ho Drive. A high school is proposed directly across the street. The site is bounded on the west by Adams Street with residential development planned for across the street. The Whitewater River, a wide wash located south of the park approximately 1/8 mile, runs east to west and could provide an opportunity for a future regional recreation trail. Another offsite factor worth considering is a large commercial development being developed southwest of the site on the other side of the Whitewater River. Adams Street, which serves this area, will become a major arterial. An Imperial Irrigation District substation is located directly southwest of the park site. An overhead wood pole transmission line will be paralleling Adams Street. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT The design of this community park represents a successful collaboration of interested citizens, dedicated staff and experienced consultants. The final product is a viable plan which will guide the ultimate development and management of this recreation resource. The Master Plan is a product of many hours of thought and discussion. Facility locations have been determined so as to minimize conflicts between unlike functions; provide visual supervision of critical areas; limit impact on adjoining properties; provide efficient internal supervision; orient related activities to enhance the overall recreation experience; and assure that all facilities blend aesthetically to benefit the surrounding community. The following sections describe the various park facilities in more detail and explain the design intent behind each facility. 5 V13 200 >r-- S 1�;ryt •1.•.Y.•' N im _ < N (. — r1 I! 1 m . < OD cn En* \ ' �'t� r' ' o CITY OF LA OUINTA o IN COMMUNITY PARK NORTH N M x O ~ p _x m z N A O -r i s ; CCi D -i m ti m m m \ I y m m A m m m m i r r Community Park North Overview/Design Concept Although this park site is currently surrounded by open undeveloped property, it has been the design team's intent to visualize the ultimate contribution this 18-acre park site will have in the future La Quinta community. In addition, a number of citizens attending the public meetings voiced an immediate need in the north end of town for informal, neighborhood type recreation amenities. The design intent has been to satisfy both community and neighborhood recreation needs at this park. It is anticipated that the lighted ballfields, community center and amphitheater will draw from the greater La Quinta community. The walking trails, picnic facilities, play courts, open turf areas and children's play area will encourage neighbor use. The proposed improvements are meant to offer citizens a breadth of active and passive type recreation opportunities. Grading In its natural state, this site offers a variety of topographic features. To accommodate the play fields, parking areas, and community center, a fair proportion of the site must be graded near level. The remainder of the site where level grades are not required has been contoured to take advantage of natural topography. We have adjusted grades to enhance and reinforce other more passive recreation uses. Specifically, the dune has been used to provide a terraced grassed slope for amphitheater seating on one side while providing informal grass seating to view the soccer field on the opposite side. This large mound also affords a panoramic overlook to distant views beyond the park site. The open play area has been contoured to create a stream and pond feature. Slight mounding is proposed along the street frontage to screen parking and provide a visual buffer. It is intended that park grades along the north border blend into the slopes associated with the residential development. The play fields will be graded with a 1-2% gradient to provide sheet drainage and prevent low ponding areas. Maximum grades for turfed slopes will be 5:1 with a gradual transition at the toe and top of slopes for safe and even mowing. Site drainage will either tie into the City storm drain system or use deep rock wells for ground water percolation. It is expected that no import or export will be required to carry out the grading of the site. 7 202 Ui5 Community Park North Off -Street Parking Three parking areas have been positioned on the park site to offer convenient vehicle access to the major activity areas. The largest lot (120 cars) is centrally located between the Community Center building and ballfield complex accessible from Westward Ho Drive. This parking area will be most used and will accommodate a large function at the Community Center or ballfield complex. It will include four handicap parking stalls and an eased curb near the restroom/concession plaza for handicap and maintenance vehicle access. An access drive will also be provided from this parking lot to the rear of the Community Center building for kitchen deliveries. A secondary 60-car parking area is located off of Adams Street for additional parking to serve the Community Center and ballfields. Another parking area (56 cars) is positioned off of Westward Ho Drive and serves the more passive end of the park. It provides convenient access to the tot play area, group picnic and open play area. All the lots would include two driveways with 90 degree parking stalls and two-way access for optimum vehicular circulation. The parking areas could be gated for closure during night hours if necessary for security. Pedestrian Access Convenient and safe pedestrian access to the site and throughout the park was a goal in the Master Plan design. There was considerable interest in providing a walking trail circuit in the park for exercise as well as access to the various activity areas. The loop trail not only ties into the streetside sidewalk and on -site parking areas but offers optional routes for the recreational walker. The loop trail represents approximately a'/2 mile circuit. The majority of the walks which serve the active areas would be 8' wide concrete with a medium broom finish. The walking path which meanders along the north and east edges of the park is proposed as decomposed granite with concrete headers. The intent is that this path defines the edge of the maintained turf from the more natural shrub and groundcover planting at the park's edge. A wood pedestrian bridge is proved on the loop walk where the trail crosses the creek with terminates in the pond feature. Pedestrian access is also provided on the north park boundary trying into a walkway link with the adjacent residential development. 1.1 �03 ui(-) Community Park North Bicycle parking will be provided near the majority activity areas. All the concrete walks will meet ADA/handicap access requirements with proper gradients, landings and ramps throughout the site. Sportsfields Two multi -purpose ballfields are designed in the central part of the park. These ballfields would have a minimum of 300' outfield limits with skinned brickdust infields. A northwest and northeast field orientation will minimize the effect of the late afternoon sun as well as locate the noise generating spectator areas toward the interior of the site. The back-to-back infields will also allow dual lighting from common light poles which reduces costs and the visual impact of additional poles. Infield improvements would include 20' high chain -link fence backstops with wood backboard, fenced dugout areas, and five tiered aluminum spectator bleachers. A restroom/concession building would serve as the hub of the ballfield complex. Full size adult soccer fields are overlapped diagonally in the outfields of the softball fields. With minimal effort, temporary goals can be erected for soccer use. Restroom/Concession Building The restroom/concession building is located between the two battlefields in a paved plaza area. This 1,00 s.f. building would include a women's restroom with four water closets and two lavatories; a men's restroom with two water closets, two urinals and two lavatories; a janitor's storage area and utility chase; and a 350 s.f. concession area with counters, sink, roll -up window and large storage pantry. The building will be constructed witli concrete block and wood beam roof. The building will be well lighted and air conditioning provided in the concession room. Construction materials and furnishings will be selected for durability and vandal resistance. Court Area Two lighted tennis courts are centrally located next to the large parking area along the Westward Ho Drive frontage. The tennis courts are positioned on its north -south axis for optimum sun orientation. The courts will have 12' high perimeter chain -link fence with windscreen. Between c courts will be graduated fence up to four feet high to control cross -court balls. Benches will be provided between courts for players' convenience. The courts will have a color coating system to easily distinguish the court area from out-of-bounds. A scheduling board will be provided for player sign -in. 0 u17 - 204 Community Park North An oval -shaped basketball court is provided that will accommodate two informal half court games. A central post with two backboards encourages two simultaneous recreation level games. Unlike a full court, this modified court takes up considerably less room and prohibits one game tying up two half courts. The courts will be aligned on a north -south axis for best sun orientation. The concrete court surface would be color coated to accentuate the boundaries and court graphics. The court will be lighted for night play. Two horseshoe courts are located in the maintained turf area adjacent to the group picnic shelter. The courts will be regulation size and constructed of compacted decomposed granite with soil bed around the pins. Wood headers and timber backboards will define the court area. The open lawn area on the eastern end of the park can accommodate a number of informal grass volleyball courts. No permanent poles, nets or sleeves are proposed in order to avoid wearing out the turf in a fixed location. Two shuffleboard or horseshoe courts are proposed near the Community Center building for senior use. The courts will be regulation size and will include shade structures and seating at either end of the courts for users convenience and comfort. Picnic Facilities A group picnic shelter that will accommodate 50 people is planned at the edge of the informal open turf area on the east side of the park. The shelter will include an overhead shade structure, six fixed concrete picnic tables, serving table, sink, group barbecue and trash receptacles. The sheltered area will be concrete paved and include fully accessible tables. Family picnic units consisting of concrete slab with fixed concrete picnic tables, trash receptacle and occasional barbecue brazier are scattered throughout the park just off the loop trail. Fast growing shade trees would be positioned adjacent to these picnic units to provide relief from the sun. A number of these units will have a paved connection to the loop trail and fully accessible tables for handicap users convenienoe. Play Area A large creative play area is positioned in a prominent location in the more passive section of the park. It is in close proximity to the restroom building and is within view of the group picnic facilities. The play area is intended to offer a variety of play experiences to tots and young children alike. It will have a recessed sand and rubber surface area contained by a 10" wide concrete curb which will also act as a mow strip for maintenance ease. The play equipment will be modular type of heavy duty plastic or plastic coated construction with a variety of colorful 10 "UI05 Community Park North separate components for various play levels. The equipment will meet the Consumer Product Safety Commission Guidelines and be accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. To maximize the use of the play area, a high overhead shade structure will be positioned to cast shade on the majority of play equipment. This open wood structure will be supported by large concrete columns and have a sloped pitch profile for visual interest. Shaded seating will be provided nearby for the comfort of supervising adults. Water Features A small water play feature will be incorporated into the play area development. The feature will be sculptural in character and be attractive whether activated or not. The creative water element will provide a cooling play experience for children with consideration of water conservation. A waterfall stream and pond feature is intended to provide a cooling, refreshing experience in the most passive part of the park. This recirculating water feature, which parallels a portion of the loop trail, will significantly add to the aesthetic backdrop of the amphitheater area. The meandering stream will be natural in character with a concrete lined stream bed accented by river run rock boulders. A plastic liner will underlie the concrete to insure an impermeable membrane. The automatic system will include a pump, filtration and aeration as necessary. Amphitheater Taking advantage of the existing dune topography, an informal amphitheater is proposed in the northeast part of the park. The east -facing amphitheater consists of wide grass terraces formed by curvilinear concrete retaining walls following the contours of the sculpted, 8-10' high mounted. A free -form shaped concrete stage of approximately 1,200 s.f. is positioned to either "play" the terraced slope or the opposite open turf field, whichever is more appropriate. Granite rock boulders are positioned on the sides of the stage to better define the area and act as natural wing entries to the stage. A single step is provided on the terrace side edge of the stage to provide a slightly elevated sense to the stage. On the open play side, the grade will be eased to meet with the elevated stage edge. A cluster of wood poles on either side of the stage will act as a support for backdrops, projection screens, stage lighting, etc. The grass terraces can accommodate approximately 500 people and the open turf area can "seat" an equivalent number of spectators. 11 J ,. t#J 06 Community Park North Access to the amphitheater is provided by concrete walks from the parking areas. Stage level spectator areas are located just off the access walk at the terrace walls for wheelchair visitors convenience. Restroom Building A small restroom building is located at the parking area associated with the passive side of the park. It will conveniently serve those park visitors enjoying the children's play area, group picnic, amphitheater ad open play area. This 625 s.f. structure will house a two -water closet, one lavatory women's restroom and a one -water closet, one urinal, one lavatory men's room. A small storage/plumbing chase will separate the restroom facilities and provide easy access to pipes and fittings. The restrooms will be of concrete block construction, well ventilated and lighted. Construction materials and furnishings will be selected for durability and vandal resistance. Community Center The Community Center has been specifically sited at the most prominent location on the park property - - the intersection of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive. As a major community resource, it was felt that this facility requires direct visibility and strong address identification. The corner of these major thoroughfares will provide the desired exposure. It is the purpose of the recreation building to provide a variety of facilities to serve the existing and future recreation and social needs of the citizens of La Quinta. In order to maximize usability, the building is separated into two sections each with its own entrance and program capabilities. This design concept provides numerous advantages in both programming efficiency and flexibility and operating costs. Programs involving or attracting diverse activity modes or social groups can be separated completely. For example, the sweat-shirted potter carting his tools and clay enters and uses a completely independent building wing from the ballroom dancer or wedding reception attendee. Each feels comfortable and enjoys a recreation experience in compatible environs. The Community Center footprint indicated in the Master Plan represents this divided approach to provide flexible indoor recreation. This building represents approximately 12,000 s.f of recreation space. The social wing includes a 2,000 s.f. assembly room that can accommodate up to 250 people for a banquet or 300 at an assembly meeting. The room can be divided by an operable partition for smaller assemblies. It includes a main lobby which acts as an important foyer for arriving and waiting guests ora stack -up area for larger social functions. A small 12 2 0 "7 Community Park North registration office is associated with the lobby and provides a source for information and supervision. A storage room accessible from the lobby and assembly room provides ample space for tables, chairs, portable storage, etc. A 200 s.f. central restroom area is also dividable to allow for separate wing users with retractable wall opened entirely up for the large occasion. A large 600 s.f. kitchen is positioned to serve both the large assembly room in the social wing or the classroom/meeting room (950 s.f..)in the activity wing. A small 200 s.f. conference room is also included off of the main lobby for small meetings (15 people) with potential for light refreshments. The activity -oriented section is served by a secondary lobby (400 s.f.)which serves three various sized classroom/meeting and craft rooms. The classroom/meeting room (950 s.f.)is positioned with access to the kitchen so that it can be used for breakfast or a luncheon type meeting (50-70 people). There is also a light arts and crafts classroom (800 s.f.) A dirty arts and crafts studio for pottery, ceramics, lapidary and woodworking and a heavy crafts workroom (220 s.f.) To house the kiln and electric potter's wheel. Both sections will have a tremendous amount of flexibility to meet changing program needs. A shaded entry court area will not only identify the building entrance but act as an informal outdoor gathering area. Landscape Improvements The majority of the site will be planted in turf. A drought -tolerant warm season grass will be used. In areas where activities do not required maintained turf, a drought tolerant groundcover with native low shrubs will be used. The groundcover and shrub plantings will help to further define the turf area for active play while conserving water. The groundcover and shrub areas which principally occur on the outside of the loop trail will act as a buffer from the streets and adjacent residences. The groundcover and shrubs will be massed to provide a strong visual effect. A concrete mow strip will be used at all fences in turf areas as well as for separation of groundcover areas to reduce maintenance costs and provide a neater appearance. Trees will be selected and placed to frame views, define activity areas, provide screenage and shade users as required. Trees will be located at least 20' apart and 10' from obstructions in turf areas to allow for efficient mechanical mowing. Species will be selected based on their success in La Quinta. Quick growth as well as long-term value will be criteria for selection. Drought, disease and pest tolerance will also be considered in determining plant species. 13 U;:'208 Community Park North The entire site will be covered by an automatic sprinkler system designed to provide adequate irrigation for the different landscape conditions. A "Cal Sense 2000" irrigation controller with moisture sensor probes will be used to optimize water efficiency. Low precipitation heads will be selected to minimize water runoff, particularly in steeper sloped areas. Rotary -type sprinklers with protective rubber covers will be used in the open play turf areas. In the groundcover areas 12" high pop shrub sprays will be used. Park Sign A monument -type park sign will be located on the slope at the corner of Adams Street and Westward Ho Drive. This sign will have recessed letters with colors and materials complimenting the park architecture. Planting will frame and enhance the sign. 14 - 209 Community Park North POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS INTRODUCTION This preliminary evaluation of environmental conditions and possible impacts of Community Park North development has evolved without scientific assessments or testing. This analysis is based on visual inspection of the site; discussion with City staff, comparison with similar projects; and a working knowledge of the Environmental Impact Report process. The intent is to identify critical impacts early in the design program so that decisions reflect both environmental concern and functional criteria. AESTHETICS The development of the park site to the level proposed in the Master Plan is beneficial to a high degree. The change in use to a well -maintained, uniformly designed high quality landscape is direct and major. The expanded facility will contribute to the recreation and social character of the area as a whole and will substantially improve the aesthetic quality of the vacant, weed - covered site. The park will become a greater focus and identity to many of the surrounding residents as well as the La Quinta community at large. LIGHT/GLARE Park security lighting will increase light levels in a minor way on a continuing basis. Proposed light fixtures will be energy efficient high intensity discharge type. The particular type will be selected for acceptable light color and illumination control in critical areas. The impacts are local, direct and minor. The nature of the impact can be considered adverse or beneficial, depending on the observer's position. Security lighting will be box -type high pressure sodium fixtures on 12 ft. dark anodized poles while parking lot lights will be on 20 ft. light poles. The selected fixtures shall direct light downward with minimal light spill. Mitigation measures will include the following: Shielding light sources, where necessary 2. Establishing minimum security levels, carefully selecting fixture locations to eliminate dark spots in the park with the fewest number of fixtures possible. 15 U�; s .� Community Park North Mercury vapor type ballfield lighting will increase light levels in a major way for a more extended time period. The 60' to 70' poles with recreation level lighting luminaries will be positioned to avoid direct spill on residential property. However, the area glare produced will have an impact on the immediate neighborhood. Mitigation measures will include: 1. Selecting a lighting system with fixtures and shielding to control and minimize light spill off of the field areas. 2. Providing a state-of-the-art control system to allow individual control of field lighting for the particular use (softball or soccer). Tennis court and basketball court lighting will be box type high pressure sodium fixtures on 20- 25 ft. dark anodized poles. Lights will be controlled by timers to avoid illumination of unused courts or after park hours. The fixtures shall direct light downward with minimal light spill. TRAFFIC/PARKING The immediate vicinity of the park will experience an increase in vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Impacts are local, direct, minor and adverse. Mitigation measures include providing on -site parking for 236 cars; locating activity centers convenient to on -site parking; providing an internal pedestrian system that ties into street sidewalks and the provision of bicycle parking facilities. NOISE Negative impacts from noise are minimal. While construction takes place, there will be significant, temporary increases in noise level during daylight office hours. The expanded recreation functions projected for the site will have a minimal impact on the anticipated noise level associated with the proposed development for the neighborhood area. All of the activity, noise -generating areas are in the central area of the park away from the residential development. Control of construction noise will require enforcement of construction specifications and inspection. Noise generated by park maintenance equipment will be controlled by adequate muffler devices and work scheduling. DUST Negative impacts are minimal. In fact, development of the property with landscape and irrigation improvements will significantly reduce the dust problems currently experienced from the unimproved property. During construction, there may be an increase in dust level; however, the construction specifications will require the contractor to take measures necessary to control he dust. 16 V I: '-, 211. iniunity Park North OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS The following construction costs are projected on the established scope of improvements and standards of development as described in the Master Plan and Design Developmen Report for Community Park North. Accurate costs can only be determined with the preparation of detailed construction documents. These cost estimates have been prepared using the latest cost information, including comparisons to similar projects or facilities that have been constructed during the last six month period. No allowance has been made for future inflation and these estimates should be periodically updated as phases are undertaken and construction plans are prepared. MOBILIZATION (1%) $ 33,314.00 GRADING/DRAINAGE $ 200,000.00 PARKING AREAS (236 cars) $ 168,740.00 CONCRETE PAVING/WALKS/ETC. $ 135,125.00 LIGHTED BALLFIELDS (2 infields) $ 224,000.00 LIGHTED BASKETBALL $ 15,300.00 LIGHTED TENNIS COURTS (2) $ 100,000.00 BUILDINGS $1,417,425.00 Community Center with Patio $1,201,800.00 Restroom/Concession $ 137,500.00 Restroom $ 78,125.00 GROUP PICNIC FACILITY $ 42,000.00 FAMILY PICNIC FACILITIES $ 36,000.00 SHADED PLAY AREA W/ WATER FEATURE $ 225,000.00 HORSESHOE COURTS (2) $ 3,000.00 GRASS VOLLEYBALL COURTS (2) $ 1,000.00 17 212 r U �. <) Community Park North SHADED SHUFFLEBOARD COURTS (2) STREAM/POND FEATURE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AMPHITHEATER SITE FURNISHINGS PARK MONUMENT SIGN LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION ELECTRICAL UTILITIES SUBTOTAL OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (10%) SUBTOTAL CONTINGENCY (10%) TOTAL 18 $ 35,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 30,400.00 $ 20,000.00 - $ 5,000.00 $ 343,470.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $3,364,774.00 $ 336,477.00 $3,701,251.00 $ 370,125.00 $4,071,376.00 rnunity Park North PHASING PROGRAM The foregoing cost estimate reflects the ultimate development of Community Park North with improvements built to a quality consistent with existing standards for other public improvements. It is a rare occasion when a development program of this scope and quality can be completed as a single construction budget. In phasing of improvements, the program should be tailored to funding limits and, where possible, it should be designed to avoid major revisions or removals with subsequent segments. An accurate phasing program can best be accomplished as a part of the preparation of schematic and preliminary construction plans. This timing will assure that full consideration is given to the ultimate infrastructure of the park and allow for accurate identification of future phases. After discussion with staff on priorities and budgets, the following phasing is suggested: Phase I Mobilization (1%) $ 8,419.00 Drainage/Grading (total site) $ 200,000.00 Parking Area (56 cars) $ 42,320.00 Trees with Drip Irrigation (total site) $ 41,600.00 Children's Play Area $ 185,000.00 Group Picnic Shelter $ 42,000.00 Horseshoe Courts (2) $ 3,000.00 Restroom $ 78,125.00 Turf in Passive Area (including irrigation) $ 55,000.00 Park Sign $ 5,000.00 Utilities (partial) $ 5,000.00 Temporary Wildflower Mix (remainder of site -- no irrigation) $ 35,446.00 Walks (total site) $ 108,203.00 Electrical (partial) $ 25,000.00 Site Furnishings (partial) $ 16,000.00 Subtotal: $ 850,113.00 Overhead, Profit and Contingency (20%) $ 170,022.00 Phase I Total: $1,020,135.00 19 214 U. P7 Community Park North Phase II Mobilization (1%) Ballfield Backstops/Infields Ballfield Turf and Irrigation Parking Area (120 cars) Restroom/Concession Lighted Basketball Court Utilities (partial) Ballfield Plaza Electrical (partial) Site Furnishings (partial) Phase III $ 5,373.00 $ 44,000.00 $ 177,250.00 $ 81,500.00 $ 137,500.00 $ 15,300.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 21,760.00 $ 25,000.00 25,000.00 Subtotal: $ 542,683.00 Overhead, Profit and Contingency (2017,o): S 108.536.00 Phase II Total: $ 651,219.00 Mobilization (1 %) $ 6,738.00 Ballfield Lighting $ 180,000.00 Lighted Tennis Courts $ 100,000.00 Amphitheater $ 30,400.00 Stream and Pond Feature $ 200,000.00 Landscape Improvements. (partial) $ 73,406.00 Water Play Feature $ 40,000.00 Electrical (partial) $ 25,000.00 Site Furnishings (partial) $ 25,000.00 Subtotal: $ 680,544.00 Overhead, Profit and Contingency (2001o): $ 136,108.00 Phase III Total: 20 $ 816,652.00 uiw;s 215 imunity Park North Phase IV Mobilization (1010) $ 13,495.00 Community Center $1,201,800.00 Parking Area (60 cars) $ 44,920.00 Shuffleboard or Horseshoe Courts $ 35,000.00 Utilities (partial) $ 5,000.00 Landscape Improvements (partial) $ 37,816.00 Electrical (partial) $ 25,000.00 Subtotal: $1,363,031.00 Overhead, Profit and Contingency (20%): $ 272,606.00 Phase IV Total: 21 $1,635,637.00 ATTACHMENT 3 City Council Minutes 12 December 1, 1992 It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Bangerter that Ordinance No. 219 be introduced on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Bangerter, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Councilmember Franklin / TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24950 (AMENDMENT #1) =—REQUEST FOR A SECOND ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A P13EVIOUSLY-APPROVED PROJECT WHICH SUBDIVIDES 9+ ACRES INTO 3�SINGLE FAMILY LOTS D ONE RETENTION BASIN LOT IN THE R-1/ ZONE, LOCATED AT THE NO AST CORNER OF MILES AVE DUNE PALMS ROAD. APPL ANT: SEOUL BANK OF CALIFORNrCHONG B. LEE). Mr. Herman, Planning Director,' advised that the City has received a' -request from Seoul/Bank of California, for .a second one-year time extension for Tract 24950 located at the northeast corner of Mile ZAvenue.and Dune Palms Road. The Planning Comm-iss/ion has recommended approval with no changes to the conditions. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to/speak, the -HEARING WAS CLOSED. RESOLUTION ,IQO . 9 2 -9 5 A RESOLWION OF THE CITY COUNCIL -,OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECONFIRMING THE ORIGINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPRO ING TENTATIVE TRACT 24950, AMENDMENT #1 SECOND EXTENSION OF 71ME - CASE NO. TT 24950 (AMENDMENT #1) SEOUL BANK OF C FORNIA (CHONG B. LEE). t w as moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Bangerte'r that Resolution nNo. 92-95 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. STUDY SESSION..... continued , o 2. REVIEW OF COMMUNITY PARK - NORTH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLRN. Mr. Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, advised that Community Park -North consists of 18.66 acres located at the future intersection of Westward Ho and Adams St. in the northern section of the City. The firm of Purkiss-Rose/RSI was selected to provide design services. City Council Minutes 13 December 1, 1992 Mr. Steve Lang, with Purkiss-Rose/RSI, addressed the Council and reviewed the proposed design describing the surrounding land uses. The concerns that surfaced at the public meetings centered around relationships with the neighbors, parking and provision of facilities which are needed in the north area of the City. He noted that the ballfield lights have been oriented to the north and northeast which is the best from a sun orientation and play use. Some of the features include: A multi -purpose ballfield with a skinned -in field and limit lines of about 300' to the outfield limits and also has overlay soccer or football that can be accommodated on the outside field areas. A 12,000 sq. ft. community center with a kitchen area and assembly area which will accommodate 250-300 people and a number of multi -purpose class -rooms. It has been situated along Adams and Westward Ho in order to have a great impact and strong visual identity for the park. It provides 120 parking spaces with additional parking along Adams - Horseshoes and shuffleboard courts and two lighted tennis courts and basketball half -courts. - A passive area with a play area with a potential for a water feature. - An informal amphitheater that will accommodate about 500 people. - A half -mile trail system which runs around the perimeter of the park. In response to questions by Council, Mr. Lang advised that a fence could be installed to protect the skinned -in area and consideration could be given to exercise stations along the perimeter. Basketball courts have not been specified to be lighted, but they could be. Regarding overflow parking for the amphitheater, the parking at the adjacent high school could be utilized. The overall cost for the project is estimated at over $4 million. They have projected four phases of development with the first phase estimated at over $1 million which includes drainage and grading of half the site, and parking for 56 cars. The real need seems to be to provide for some of the neighborhood type of amenities. Mr. Bohlen advised that with Council's authorization, this design will be processed through the Design Review Board and Planning Commission and ultimately back to the City Council. Council concurred. 213uoj ATTACHMENT 4 City Council Minutes 5 January 19, 1993 5. CONSOERATION OF FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING COMMUNITY SERVICE GrdWT FUNDING OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA. Mrs . Kennedy, Chai oman of the Community Services Commission, advised that the Commion recommends that an allocation of $1,550 from the Community vices Grant Program be granted to the Boy Scouts. MOTION - It was moved by Councilmemb Sniff/Bangerter that the previously allocated 1992-93 $1,55 BSA Grant be released to the BSA -Redlands office for local distribution to benefit La Quinta Cub and Boy Scouting programs. M on carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 93-18. 6. CONSIDERATION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF PARK DESIGN AND MASTER PLAN OF COMMUNITY PARK NORTH. Mr. Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, advised that the park design and master plan of the Community Park North have been reviewed by the Design Review Board, Planning Commission and the Community Services Commission with a great deal of public input. He briefly reviewed the design and amenities that are planned, advising that the site which consists of 18.6 acres contains baseball fields, soccer fields, a community center building, shuffle board/horseshoe courts, tennis courts, a basketball court, restrooms, volleyball courts, shaded trellis areas, an outdoor amphitheater, water feature and walking paths. In response to Councilmember Perkins, Mr. Bohlen advised that there is a walking path around the perimeter of the park and consideration can be given to exercise stations. Councilmember Sniff questioned the type of senior activities planned and Mr. Bohlen responded shuffleboard and perhaps lawn bowling. Councilmember Perkins complimented staff on a well laid -out park. Regarding the estimated cost, Mr. Bohlen advised that it is estimated between $4.6 and $4.8 million, but is designed to be built in phases. MOTION - It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Bangerter to accept and approve the design development report and master plan as submitted for the Community Park North. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 93-19. t� J�- 219 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 5 In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue . Perris, California 92570 . (9M) 940-6900 • Fax (9W) 940-691 O December 13, 1999 rir d James M. Wright Fire Chief Proudly serving the Tom Genovese, City Manager 11IIincorpomted City of La Quinta areas of Riverside County and the 78-495 Calle Tampico Cities of: La Quinta, California 92253 Banning ❖ Dear Tom: Beaumont Calimesa This letter is in response to your inquiry concerning a parcel of land for a future %% fire station site in the Community Park North. It is the recommendation of the Canyon Lake Fire Department that a minimum of two acres be reserved for a future fire station Coachella for the North La Quinta area. As you are aware from previous conversations, • the growth and continued increase in service demand for this area, a fire station Desert Hot Springs is certainly necessary to assure adequate protection for both comrle, vial and Indian Wells residential devalopments in your city. g. Indio To provide safe and appropriate emergency vehicle access for entering and Lace Elsinore leaving the station, our first priority for a station site would be the corner of '0' Adams and Westward Ho. Our second choice would be a site on Adams north La Quinta .. of the proposed parking lot. Moreno Valley We look forward to working with the City of La Quinta in making this needed Pa�Deser< •: - public safety facility a reality as soon as possible. Please contact Chief Perris LPI,;laughlin or myself if you have additional information. Rai .ho Mirage •:• Sincerely, Sar .lacilitc, Temecula Board of Su pC1y'�� JAMES M. WRIGHT County Fire Chief Bob Buster, District 1 JMW:db / John Tavaglime, District2 cc: Tom Hartung, Director of Building and Safety v Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, District S Tity,l 4 46 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Consideration of Commemorative Tree And Plaque Along The Bear Creek Trail RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: There are no fiscal implications to the City of La Quinta. Should the City Council authorize the placement of the tree and plaque, the cost of materials and installation will be provided by Mr. & Mrs. Ron Legg. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the December 21, 1999 City Council meeting, the City Council received a request from Mr. & Mrs. Ron Legg, as provided in Attachment 1, requesting authorization to place a commemorative tree and plaque along the Bear Creek Trail. This request is in memory of their son who passed away in January, 1998. This item was referred to staff to agendize. The City has granted placement of trees and plaques on at least two occasions at local park sites. For example, individuals were honored for making significant contributions to the City, Marty Yackman with a plaque at Fritz Burns Park, and Ruth Campagna with a tree at Eisenhower Park. A copy of the Minutes in regard to these actions are provided as Attachments 2 and 3. Additionally, please be advised that under written correspondence on the January 18, 2000 City Council Agenda, the City Council has received a request from Mrs. Alice Bailes Bell requesting a commemorative tree to be placed at the La Quinta Senior Center in memory of Mr. Hayden Bower, as provided in Attachment 4. Mr. Bower had volunteered several hours at the La Quinta Senior Center. 221 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the placement of a commemorative tree and plaque along the Bear Creek Trail by Mr. & Mrs. Ron Legg; or 2. Do not authorize the placement of a commemorative tree and plaque along the Bear Creek Trail by Mr. & Mrs. Ron Legg; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Resdectfulld submitted, odie Horvkz-,\Cgmmunity Services Director Approved for submission by: (--- �Zx Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Correspondence from Mr. & Mrs. Ron Legg 2. Minutes from the City Council Meeting of April 6, 1993 3. Minutes from the City Council Meeting of November 21, 1995 4. Correspondence from Alice Bailes Bell 002 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.022.wpd .. 09.0 % ATTACHMENT 1 Ronald a Janette Legg 52-120 Velasco Ave ' La Quinta. Calif 92253 USA December 08, 1999 Name: City Council Address: La Quinta State: California, 92253 C/O Dear: City Council, My son, Michael Legg, died on January 5th, 1998. My wife and I walk the path bordering the West side of the cove daily. We would like to plant a commemorative tree and place a plaque with his name engraved on it in his honor. With the permission of City Council we would like to proceed with Memorial place come this January 2000. We will fdIloW 4ny and all instructions given by to us by City Council. Sincerely, Janette & Ron Legg U'.)I 22no ATTACHMENT 2 City Council Minutes 24 April 6, 1993 11. CONSIDERATION OF POLICY REGARDING USE OF GIFT VOUCHERS AND CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GOLF VOUCHERS FROM LANDMARK LAND COMPANY. Mrs. LiCalsi, Administrative Analyst, advised that at the last meeting, the Council discussed acceptance of 150 golf vouchers from Landmark Land Co., which has been done in the past. A draft policy for the use of the vouchers and a listing of how the vouchers had been used in the past is contained in the staff report. Council Member Sniff questioned the value of the vouchers and Mrs. LiCalsi advised that they range from $75 to $175 per person depending on the course, which would be a minimum total of $12,500. In further response to Council Member Sniff, Mrs. LiCalsi advised that her understanding is that it's Landmarts opinion that if La Quinta succeeds their facility succeeds and a large part of what the City is about is golf. Council Member Bangerter was opposed to accepting the vouchers commenting that we need to place ourselves above reproach. Council Member McCarthy stated that he, too, was opposed. Council Member Sniff felt that to some degree, a gift represents an obligation. He suggested that if they wish to give the vouchers for promotional purposes, that they be given to the Chamber of Commerce. Council Member Perkins suggested a nice letter to Landmark thanking them for the offer and referring them to the Chamber. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to deny the gift of golf vouchers and suggest that they might want to approach the Chamber of Commerce with this issue. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 93-88. 12. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PLACING MARTY YACKMAN MEMORIAL PLAQUE AT FRITZ BURNS PARK. Mr. Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager, recommended that the City cooperate in the placement of a plaque at the Fritz Burns Park to memorialize Marty Yackman and his contributions to tennis in the community. '' N uo5 n City Council Minutes 25 April 6, 1993 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to direct staff to cooperate in the placement of a plaque on the southwest comer of Tennis Court #2 at Fritz Bums Park, and appropriate $100 from the Contingency Account for the placement of the plaque. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 93-89. 13. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 2.65 OF THE LA QUINTA- MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that Ordinance No. 226 be taken up by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 226 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.65 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES". It was moved by Council Members Bangerter/Sniff to introduce Ordinance No. 226 on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bangerter, McCartney, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 14. CONSIDERATION OF DESIGN FOR CIVIC CENTER GROUNDBREAKING AND DEDICATION PLAQUES. Mrs. LiCalsi, Administrative Analyst, advised that the Council has previously decided to have two separate plaques - one for the groundbreaking and one for the dedication. Council Member Sniff preferred to see only the City Council names on both plaques. Council concurred. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Bangerter/Sniff to accept the design for the dedication and groundbreaking plaques and omitting the City Manager, Contractor and Architect. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 93-90. u �2 2 �5 � ATTACHMENT 3 City Council Minutes 2 November 21, 1995 1. LETTER FROMM2"' DON ADOLPH RESIGNING FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. See Mayor and Council Members' Items for discussion. t. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING OF PARK LOCATED AT LA PALMA AND • ADAMS STREET. Ms. Nicholson, Parks and Recreation Director, advised that the park located at La Palma and Adams Street, currently referred to as the Palm Royale Park, was acquired prior to the adoption of the City's Park -Naming Policy. The Parks & Recreation Commission solicited the public for suggested park names in which a total of nine suggestions were received. The Parks & Recreation Commission is submitting the following names for Council's consideration: Serrano Park, The Park at North La Quints, La Quinta Memorial Park - Remembering Our Youth, and Ryan Ramirez Park. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, asked who Ryan Ramirez was. Ms. Nicholson advised that Ryan was an art student who was recently killed in an automobile accident at Miles Avenue and Dune Palms Road and his family are residents of La Quinta. Mr. Tyler felt that the park -naming policy should be followed and that naming the park after Ryan Ramirez would not be in accord with the policy, nor would it be appropriate. He suggested that the park name be left as Palm Royale Park and asked that it be put on the City map. Ms. Connie Baty, 78-900 Sonesta Way, supported naming the park after Ryan Ramirez because of his commitment to excellence and great artistic talent and the fact that he died near the park location. She said that 25 people submitted nominations for the park to be named after Ryan Ramirez. Ms. Karen Austin, 51-295 Avenida Diaz, also supported naming the park after Ryan because she felt that he was a very special person who loved children and always had a smile on his face. She felt that naming the park after him would signify the joy he portrayed. 22G U0 9 City Council Minutes 3 November 21, 1995 Council Member Bangerter asked Ms. Nicholson to explain the park -naming process to the audience. Ms. Nicholson advised that names are solicited by the Parks & Recreation Department. The names received are reviewed by the Parks & Recreation Commission who in turn make a recommendation to the Council and the Council adopts a name for the park. Council Member Perkins asked how the park became known as the Palm Royale Park. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that the park is located near the Palm Royale development and a consultant working on the General Plan applied that name for purposes of identification. Council Member Sniff felt that park names should be identified with their location and that naming them after individuals is a problem because of the many worthy people in the community. He suggested that the name be identified with Adams Street since it's located there. He felt that an "honors plaza" should be established in one of the parks so that plaques can be placed to honor those whom the citizens feel have made a significant contribution to the City. Council Member Perkins agreed that location should be a consideration in naming the park to make it easily identifiable and suggested naming park facilities such as ballfields or playgrounds after individuals. Council Member Sniff didn't have a problem with that. Council Member Bangerter suggested that the park -naming policy be reviewed again, pointing out that a number of suggestions were received on request of the City and now we're looking at ignoring the suggestions. Council Member Cathcart was sympathetic to the situation, but felt that the nominations received were advisory only. He supported some type of recognition at the park for Ryan Ramirez, but was in favor of naming the park after the location. Mayor Peft concurred and advised that tree plantings have sometimes been used to honor individuals. Council Member Cathcart pointed out that the four planned major parks could be easily named after location, with the exception of the Fritz Burns Park. Council Member Bangerter didn't have a problem with that, but felt that it's important to provide the public with more specific guidelines if the Council wishes their input. u it 227 City Council Minutes 4 November 21, 1995 -- Mayor Peft felt that guidelines are provided and advised that the Council doesn't always accept the recommendations made by the City's commissions. He favored letting the people know that the Council wished to name parks after locations and that locations within the parks can be set aside for honoring individuals. Council Member Cathcart felt that the City should formulate a new method for informing the public if their input is going to be relied on so that more people are aware of what the City is attempting to do. Council Member Sniff suggested the following park names in order of preference: Adams Street Park, Adams Street Youth Park, La Quinta Youth Park, and Palm Royale Park. Mayor Pena suggested North Palm Royale Park or Palm Royale at Adams Street Park. Council Member Perkins liked North Palm Royale Park. Council Member Bangerter suggested Adams Street North Park. Council Member Perkins suggested North Adams Street Park. Council Member Cathcart suggested sending the matter back to the Parks & Recreation Commission for location -specific recommendations. Mayor Pella suggested that public input once again be solicited. Council Member Sniff felt that the Commission should be informed that the Council prefers more site or street -specific names and ask them to consider naming various facilities or trees after individuals. Council Member Cathcart suggested that facilities or trees named after individuals have a plaque commemorating the person. Ms. Baty questioned the Council's decision to refer the matter back to the Commission instead of considering the recommendations already offered. Mayor Peria advised that specific guidelines as to naming the park according to location would be given to the Commission this time. Ms. Baty felt that some of the Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations were site specific and advised that their recommendation did include dedicating specific areas of the park after individuals. Vv9 ?2U City Council Minutes 5 November 21, 1995 Council Member Cathcart felt that The Park at North La Quinta was the only submitted name that he would support since it's the only one that represents the location. Council Member Perkins supported referring it back to the Commission for site -specific names. Council Ni mber Sniff Alt that the Commission should also consider the size and content of the plaques used to commemorate individuals to insure uniformity. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to refer the matter of naming the park at La Palma and Adams Street back to the Parks & Recreation Commission for further consideration based on the discussion that transpired at this time - to be more site specific and to make recommendations as to a method to honor certain individuals within parks. Motion carried with Council Member Bangerter voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 95-200. 2. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING OF PARK LOCATED AT EISENHOWER DRIVE AND CALLE COLIMA. Ms. Nicholson, Parks and Recreation Director, advised that suggested park names were solicited and received from the public for the park at Eisenhower Drive and Calle Colima which is currently referred to as the Cove Mini Park. The Parks & Recreation Commission has recommended the following park names: Hidden City Park, Cove Mini Park, and Kay & Fred Wolff Park. Ms. Terry Henderson, 54-711 Eisenhower Drive, advised that the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission stated that no response was received from the La Quinta Historical Society regarding the park name. She advised that the Society discussed the park name and recommended that it be named the John C. Marshall Park. However, she felt that identifying the park with the location was a better idea. Council Member Sniff advised that a memorial tree was placed in the park for Mrs. Ruth Campagna. He was in favor of referring the matter back to the Parks & Recreation Commission with a request to be more site specific. Mayor Pena felt that Cove Mini Park was an appropriate name since it's been known that way for so long. Council Member Sniff agreed, but felt that another name such as Eisenhower Mini Park might be better in case another mini -park is located in the Cove at a later date. Council Member Perkins wished to see the matter referred back to the Commission. f7-1 City Council Minutes 6 November 21, 1995 MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to refer the matter of naming the park at Eisenhower Drive and Calle Colima back to the Parks & Recreation Commission for further consideration based on the discussion that transpired during Business Session Item No. 1 - to be more site specific and to make recommendations ast; to a method to honor seam individuals w#bin parks. Motion carried with Council Member Bangerter voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO. 95-201. 3. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR COMPENSATION OF THE VARIOUS CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that on October 17, 1995, the Council directed staff to bring before them a uniform policy for compensating the various Boards and Commissions. Staff recommended that all Boards and Commissions be compensated $50.00 per meeting up to $50.00 per month, except for the Planning Commission which would receive $50.00 per meeting up to $100.00 per month. Special meetings or subcommittee meetings would not be compensated. An allocation of $2,450 from the General Fund Emergency Reserve Account is necessary to compensate for the deficiencies in the Parks & Recreation Department budget for the Parks & Recreation Commission and the Cultural Commission for the period of December 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. Council Member Sniff supported the policy and felt that all Boards and Commissions should be treated uniformly. Council concurred. RESOLUTION NO.95-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING A COMPENSATION POLICY FOR CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to adopt Resolution No. 95- 86 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to appropriate $2,450 from the General Fund Emergency Revenue Account to cover the additional costs. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 95-202. U.1 2ta 0' 12/29/99 City of LaQuinta LaQuinta, CA; 92253 Dear Mayor Pena & City Council Members: ATTACHMENT 4 Mrs. Marilyn Smith has informed me that I must have your approval to donate a tree to the city to be planted near the Senior Centcr building to honor the memory of I layden Bower who passed away in the fall Chain of events that followed: Originally I intended to present his widow Muriel with a tree for their yard. Muriel suggested we plant it at the Senior Center where I layden did volunteer work. Marilyn Smith concurred with this suggestion as the center needs more shade trees. We needed City approval. Mr. Daniel Jewett, a nursery owner, heard of our intentions, and told us he would give us the tree. Also deliver and plant it upon city approval. It is questionable at this phase as to who should be submitting this petition to you. Should it be Muriel, Daniel Jewett, or me? Please accept this petition on behalf of all three. Thank you for your assistance. It is much appreciated all e"C441C�ff Alice Bailes Bell 11.0. Box 1057 La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: 564 0700 231 T4ht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: �/ BUSINESS SESSION: b COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Continued Consideration of KSL's Request that the PUBLIC HEARING: City of La Quinta Modify its Position on the Proposed National Monument Designation RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Staff met with Congresswoman Mary Bono's Office, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Building Industry Association (BIA), and concerned citizens on the 7th of January to discuss the boundaries of the Monument. BLM will try to modify the boundary map and have it available for Council review at the Council meeting. In addition, staff has received a letter from the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy (Attachment 1) responding to the 11 points identified by KSL in their correspondence dated December 17, 1999. As of this writing draft legislation has not been prepared and is therefore, not available for Council review. Staff will continue to work with Congresswoman Mary Bono's Office and the BLM regarding the monument boundaries. The previous Council report submitted on January 4, 2000 is Attachment 2. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Recommend selected amendments to the draft legislation and boundaries, and direct staff to prepare the appropriate Resolution; or 23 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-Monument.wpd 2 Take no action; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jer y Herm n C mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy letter dated January 11, 2000 2. January 4, 2000 Staff Report 233 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-Monument.wpd 002 ATTACHMENT 1 FROH : C1,1 HOUNTA I hJS C 1,1 SERVANCY PHO►JE 110. : 909 765 6251 Jan. 09 20130 09:12PM P2 COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY State of California In partnership to protect our mountain heritage January 11, 2000 City Council t4f City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: National Monument Proposal Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to comment on KSL's proposal regarding National Monument legislation and its request that the City opposes legislation unless it incorporates KSL's proposed language. The Conservancy, as you know, drafted the original legislative proposal to Congresswoman Mary Bono for a National Monument. Our proposed language was straightforward and clear in purpose: to have Congress designate a National Monument that recognizes the resource values of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto mountains. The designation would not preclude development and would not take away private property rights. What it would do is enhance the likelihood of congressional appropriations to BLM and the Forest Service for better management and for future land acquisition from willing sellers. The benefit is that when we complete the multiple species habitat conservation plan, we'll want access to as many state and federal funding sources as possible to reduce the burden on local funding sources. In addition, BLM and USFS would, under our proposal, prepare a coordinated management plan for the mountains and would invite local, state, tribal, and special district jurisdictions to participate in the preparation of the plan. The KSL proposal dramatically changes the purpose and intent of National Monument legislation and would, if adopted by the Congresswoman, stimulate opposition from environmental groups, resulting in a battle in Congress sufficient to stymie passage. For those who are not interested in protecting our mountains, that would undoubtedly be a victory. When the National Monument effort began, we all had a chance to be winners as the Monument designation would enhance the area's stature as a vacation destination and likely lead to more federal funding for acquisition from willing sellers, thus helping to implement the multiple species habitat conservation plan. KSL's proposal threatens to be 234 45-480 Portola Ave. • Palm Desert, CA 92260 • 760-776-5026 ' Fax 760-776-9698 u V 4 -- DFf' V T VF.T) FROM c 999 765 6251 P - 92 FROM CV MOUNTAINS CON`GEROANCY PHONE NO. : 909 765 6251 Jan. 09 2000 09:13PM P3 divkiivc and finny NvelI convert an opportunity for coolxration into a battleground. I hope the City, and ultimately KSL, will recognize that National Monument designation is not a threat, but rather a positive step forward. I have attached KSL's version of the proposed legislation, and the following numbered comments correspond to the numbers on KSL's proposal.. (#I) KSL states that "One of the primary reasons for adoption of the Act is to facilitate land development in the Coachella Valley". This would be a remarkable departure from the history of the federal government's establishment of national monuments, national parks, national conservation areas, national scenic areas, and Wilderness areas. Such areas have always been designated solely to recognize an area's extraordinary scenic, cultural resource, wildlife, and recreational values. It has never been, and is not now either relevant or appropriate to designate a National Monument for the purpose - whether primary or secondary - of facilitating land development in an area. (#Z) KSL states that "the continued economic strength of the region is essential to the objective of this Act .... One of the primary purposes of this Act is to set aside land to be included in the National Monument in order to facilitate and assist land development in other areas of the Coachella valley." Again, this would bean unprecedented, as well as an irrelevant, statement. The purpose of the. Act is to recognize the national significance of the scenic, wildlife, cultural, and recreational values of the mountains. Their significance is independent of the, economic strength of the region and the designation of the National Monument is not a. mitigation measure for development elsewhere in the valley. (0) KSL proposes that a map and legal description of the boundaries of the National Monument be included as part of the legislation. For the very practical reason that developing a legal description is a lengthy task, Congress does not include legal descriptions in most designations. It is perfectly appropriate, and quite adequate, to include a map delineating the boundaries and directing the Secretary to prepare a legal description as soon as practicable. This often takes several years. KSL also proposes in'their Item 3, that "In no instance shall the boundaries for the National Monument include land on the desert floor or within the city limits of any Coachella .Valley municipality. This would exclude a very large area in the heart of the mountains, from the mouth of Palm Canyon up to the national forest, annexed by Palm Springs many years ago. This area includes.many square miles of BLM and Forest Service land. Other areas would also be excluded, including areas in Rancho Mirage of city owned land upon which the City has granted conservation easements to protect the land in perpetuity, and area in Palm Desert purchased in part with grant funds expressly for -the purpose of conserving the land. The Wilderness area includes some land on the alluvial fans because of the high cultural resource and wildlife values of those lands. The KSL proposal would exclude these existing Wilderness lands from the National Monument. 235 U(J5 IT.OH : CO HOLiNTO I E. CDIdSFRURNC'Y PHOIE 110. : 909 765 6251 Jan. 09 2000 09 : 15PM P4 (#4) KSL proposes that "The boundary of the National Monument nearest the desert floor shall in all instances be located not less than 900 feet up or back from the toe of slope in order to allow reasonable development and other land uses, as determined by the local agency with land use jurisdiction." This artificially excludes the lowest portion of the mountains even when such land is federal or state or local conservation land. Such a restriction is inappropriate and unnecessary since the legislation as proposed by the Conservancy does not affect private land and does not preempt local agencies' land use authority to approve development if it so chooses. The boundary of the National Monument should respect the geographic integrity of the mountains by following the topography to include all of the mountains from toe of slope to ridgeline. The resource values to be recognized as of national significance by the designation do not suddenly begin a minimum of 900` above the toe of slope. (#5) KSL's proposal sates that "Congress specifically prohibits the creation of any type Of protective perimeter or buffer zones around this National Monument", even though KSL's .item 4 effectively establishes a minimum 900' buffer between the monument boundary and the developed and developing areas on the desert floor. 1 submit that the language already included in the Conservancy's proposal . adequately addresses the no buffer issue without placing Congress in the position of dictating to local governments what they may or may not do. That language states, "The Congress does not. intend for the designation of this National Monu rent to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer zones around this National Monument. The fact activities or uses can be seen or heard from within the National Monument shall not, of itself, preclude such activities or uses up to the boundary of this national Monument." (#6) KSL's proposal. states that "The existence of the National Monument shall not itself constitute an environmental impact... under statutory environmental analysis schemes including the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 4321 et. seq. ("NEPA") or the California Environmental Quality Act... Congress does not have the authority to amend CEQA, nor should Congress attempt to dictate to local jurisdictions what they should or should not address as potential impact. The local jurisdictions have adequate authority and land use decision -making powers to determine what is or isn't an environmental impact. Local jurisdictions should make the decisions they feel are appropriate.rather than cede their decision -making powers to Congress. (#7) KSL's proposal states that "No governmental entity, as a condition of project approval for any land development application, may impose development impact fees or require dedication of land to be used towards creation or maintenance of the National Monument." Nothing in the draft prepared by the Conservancy confers or implies any ability on the part of a local jurisdiction -to impose fees or other exactions because of the National Monument. As stated in #6 above, The local jurisdictions have adequate authority and land use decision -making powers 236 U06 n. _. n_Qn 9A:AI RECEIVED FROM:909 765 6251 P.04 FRAH 00 VI d INTi i I H--- i- i C1FP0AN(Y PHONE NO. : 909 765 6251 Jan. 09 2000 09: 16PIl P5 it) ticicni►inc; Iluit no exactions or fees are appropriate, and H is hcltei for local jurisdictions to make this decision rather than cede their decision -making power to Congress. (#8) KSL's proposal states "The management plan shall include provisions authorizing public access to the National Monument'land for, including without limitation, hiking, camping, mountain biking, sightseeing and horseback riding." It is certainly intended, and nothing in the Conservancy's draft suggest otherwise, that the National Monument shall remain accessible to people for various recreational' uses, just as the National'Scenic Area has been accessible. The KSL language, however, adds the provision "without limitation", which implies that neither BLM nor the Forest Service can place any limitations or restrictions on these uses. This would take away their ability to manage and protect -the resources and ensure that recreational uses are managed to be compatible with resource protection. (#9) KSL's proposal states "Until the management plan is prepared and adopted, the fact that it has not been so prepared and adopted shall have no impact whatsoever upon any activity which may take place either inside or outside the boundaries of the National Monument area." Nothing in the Conservancy draft either states or implies th4t uses would be curtailed or restricted because the management plan had not yet been prepared. If the City, however, believes KSL's language is necessary, I would suggest the language be changed to read 'Neither BLM nor USFS shall restrict activities within -the National Monument solely because the management plan has not yet been adopted." BLM and USFS have no purview over activities on non-federal lands outside the National Monument so it is not appropriate to imply that they do, as is the case with the KSL wording. (#10) KSL's proposal states"Nothing in this Act or the Secretary's management plan shall inhibit or curtail, the ability of government agencies or public utility companies to install, construct,. and maintain public utilities and infrastructure as required for the public health, safety, and welfare." This language should apply only to private lands, as Congress should allow BLM and the Forest Service to determine when and if facilities should be allowed on federal land in the National Monument. The management plan, it should be noted, applies only to federal lands and KSL's language is not needed to protect private lands. (#11) KSL's proposal states 'Nothing in this Act shall impinge or compromise in any way the jurisdiction of local and regional government agencies over local land use in decisions and related procedures and hearings." Nothing in the draft legislation proposed by the Conservancy would lead anyone to think this isn't already true, and we have no objection to such language, albeit it seems unnecessary and intended primarily to convey local jurisdictions' distrust of Congress. As you can see, there are many problems with the KSL proposal. Whether intentionally or inadvertently, it is a No Monument proposal and would only create widespread 237 opposition to National Monument legislation: The result would be that no legislation u07 FROM : 00 MOUHTA I P IS CUNSERUANCY PHONE NO. : 909 765 6251 Jan. 09 2000 09 : 1?PM P6 would he passed and an important oppoituniiy for the dcvclopment and conservation community to work cooperatively to help secure enhanced federal funding for acquisition from willing sellers would be thrown away. I urge the Council not to support the KSL proposal and to take no further action until such time as a draft bill by Congresswoman Bono is available for consideration. Sincerely, Bill Havert Executive Director cc: Kim Waltrip for Congresswoman Bono u08 233 P-06 ATTACHMENT 2 4 ol*p Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 Consideration of KSL's Request that the City of La Quinta Modify its Position on the Proposed National Monument Designation RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The City Council adopted Resolution 99-50 Supporting Designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument at the request of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy (CVMC) at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999 (the corresponding Resolution, Meeting Minutes, and Staff Report are provided as Attachment 1). Subsequently, Congressman Bono's Office met with the Mountains Conservancy, Bureau of Land Management, Building Industry Association (BIA), City staff, and other public and private entities (including representatives of KSL) to review proposed boundaries and draft legislation for the Monument. Staff then individually met with representatives of Congressman Bono's Office, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Coachella Valley Water District to review the proposed National Monument boundary within the City. Staff requested minor modifications to several areas, namely moving the boundary line to follow the toe of slope. Secondly, staff requested reconsideration of placing the boundary immediately south of Calle Tecate. The BLM agreed to reconfigure the boundary to wrap around any CVWD and City property. A revised map will be available at the Council meeting. 0 0 9 239 KSL forwarded correspondence to the City Council dated December 17, 1999, proposing specific modifications (as proposed by the BIA) to the draft legislation prepared by the CVMC (Attachment 2). A summary by KSL of the modifications are identified on Pages 27 through 29 as contained in Attachment 2. The City Council asked that this matter be placed on today's agenda in response to KSL's correspondence. Pursuant to City Council direction of December 21, 1999, staff has advised the CVMC, Building Industries Association, KSL, and Congressman Bono's Office that this matter has been placed on today's agenda for consideration. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Recommend selected amendments to the draft legislation and boundaries, with or without rescinding Resolution 99-50; or 2 Rescind Resolution 99-50 and direct staff to prepare a Resolution in opposition to the National Monument Designation for future Council consideration; or 3 Take no action; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, iry rwrman mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. City Council staff report of April 6, 1999 2. Correspondence from KSL dated December 17, 1999 l 0.1 U .1.0 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 99-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT. WHEREAS, the federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service on the desert slopes of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain a wealth of natural features including the dramatic San Jacinto escarpment rising abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, incorporating five Life Zones from Sonoran Desert to Arctic Alpine; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains provide the scenic backdrop for the Coachella Valley communities and are an important economic resource for the area's tourist economy; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains also contain nationally significant cultural sites, including village sites, trails, and other evidence of habitation by Cahuilla Indians; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains are an important recreational resource for residents and visitors alike; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain exceptional biological diversity; and WHEREAS, as urban development has increased and continues to increase in the Coachella Valley and throughout Southern California, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains have become increasingly important as a natural treasure in close proximity to millions of urban residents and countless visitors from all over the world. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE that the City recognizes the importance of protecting this magnificent and unique resource and supports the establishment of the Sant Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in order to preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological and scientific values found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, California, as an enduring legacy of our heritage, and to secure for future generations the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, wildlife, land forms, and natural and cultural resources in these mountains. 241. 012 Resolution No. 99-50 Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains Adopted: 4/6/99 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 61' day of April, 1999, by the following vote AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None aNL JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: `//SAUNDRA L. JUHnCA, City Clerk 1. City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWE L, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 242 013 City Council Minutes 11 April 6, 1999 In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Hartung advised that approximately 26 windows would be replaced. As for the air conditioning, the offices would continue to be individually controlled by the individual sensors in each office. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, noted that the proposed window replacement came up as an option in response to Council's concern about the lower windows allowing visibility into the offices. Mayor Pena and Council Member Perkins both had concerns about the windows, and after a brief discussion, Council concurred on having the window treatment issue brought back separately. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve project plans, specifications, and estimates, deleting the window treatments, for Project 99-03, Various City Hall Improvements, and locating the 1999 art purchase on the City Hall south lawn, and authorizing an expenditure of not to exceed $4,000 from the Art in Public Places Fund to construct a suitable base for the art piece, and further authorizing staff to advertise the project and receive bids. In response to Council Member Adolph, Council Member Sniff clarified that the "suitable" base would be as determined suitable by the artist. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-38. Council Member Sniff suggested that staff bring back the window treatment issue with options including windows that open and windows with obscured glass. Council concurred on taking up Item No. 10 at this time. 10. CONSIDERATION OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY REQUEST TO SUPPORT THE DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT. Mr. Weiss, Assistant City Manager, advised that the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy is requesting the City's support of legislation that would designate the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument. The Conservancy feels that the designation may enhance the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) and Conservancy's ability to secure Federal acquisition funds in the future. It may also strengthen the valley's appeal for ecotourism. He advised that the cities of Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells have voted to 243 014 City Council Minutes 12 April 6, 1999 support the designation, and that the issue is pending in the cities of Cathedral City and Palm Desert. Palm Springs has not agendized the issue. Issues and concerns that have surfaced to date include: potential effect on municipal or. undeveloped lands adjacent to the mountains; potential for future requests for additional buffers from the National Monument; potential for adverse impact to ecotourism due to limitations placed on trails or future public access to mountains; and potential loss of local control. The proposed legislation attempts to mitigate these concerns by including language in 4(b) and 4(c) that discourages establishment of buffers and states that the designation will not affect Indian reservations, State, or privately -owned lands or interest in lands. Katie Barrows, 45-480 Portola Avenue, Palm Desert, of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy, distributed a map showing the boundaries of the proposed National Monument, and advised that Cathedral City has now voted to support the legislation. The proposed designation will only affect Federal lands (BLM and National Forest), and will not affect private or municipally - owned lands. Except for the potential for mineral withdrawal of the BLM lands, it's reasonable to say that there will be no change from the National Scenic Area status. Their reasons for pursuing this designation are to gain recognition of the value of our natural resources, and to increase chances for funding, which is needed to acquire lands because of the potential Multi -Species Habitat Plan and some of the conflicts due to the Peninsula Big Horn Sheep issue. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Barrows advised that the Coral Mountain area is included because it's part of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The boundary line is essentially the same as the National Scenic area boundary, and follows the toe of the slope from the San Jacinto Mountains behind Palm Springs southward to the County line. There's a small portion within the Santa Rosa Mountains Wilderness Area. In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Barrows advised that any changes made after the designation is approved would have to go back through Congress. The Conservancy is currently looking for input to find out if there's support for the legislation and what the concerns might be. They've already incorporated language regarding buffers to address some concerns of the Building Industry Association, and will add language to clarify that local government land is excluded. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Barrows advised that it's not their intention to jeopardize or prohibit the trails from being used. Currently there are some concerns about trail access impacting the Big Horn Sheep, and that law would override this legislation. It will not interfere with existing ownerships of property, and land acquisitions will only take place with willing sellers. 244 U15 City Council Minutes 13 April 6, 1999 In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Barrows advised that there are only three or four National Monuments on BLM land in the United States. Council Member Henderson didn't have a problem with the proposed legislation. Council Member Sniff didn't see any significant downside, and felt there's a lot of positives. It will help provide funding, which is essential if the Conservancy is to move forward in a meaningful way, and it's compatible to La Quinta's commitment to preserve the mountains surrounding the City. He recommended support of the legislation. Council Member Adolph asked if it would result in better maintenance of the trail system, to which Ms. Barrows responded that they hope so and would be pushing for that. Mayor Pena felt the City has been extremely responsible in conserving its hillsides, and believed this legislation would benefit and strengthen what the City already has, noting that there's a lot of concern about maintaining access to the mountains. In response to Mr. Genovese, City Manager, Ms. Barrows confirmed that there would be no Federally -mandated approval processes to develop within the boundaries, and that any restrictions would only apply to Federal lands. RESOLUTION NO. 99-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 99-50 as submitted. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Barrows confirmed that language would be added to exclude cities, the county, and other local jurisdictions. Motion carried unanimously. U16 245 T4ht 4 XP Q" COUNCILI"A MEETING DATE: April 6, 1999 Consideration of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy Request to Support the Designation of the Santa Rosa Mountains as a National Monument RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: /Q CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy has requested that the City Council support the designation of the Santa Rosa Mountains as a National Monument and authorize a letter to be sent in support of the proposed legislation. Correspondence from the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy is included as Attachment 1 and the proposed legislation is included as Attachment 2. The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains are geologically the oldest and highest part of the Peninsular Range that stretches nearly 1,000 miles from Palm Springs south through Baja California. The desert slopes of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain a wealth of natural features including the dramatic San Jacinto escarpment rising abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, the largest fan palm oasis in the country with more than 6,000 palm trees, and several long and meandering canyons. Although the lower elevations of the mountains were officially declared a National Scenic Area in 1990, this designation ends at the higher elevations of the national forest boundary. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages the lower elevations of the mountains, which are designated as the National Scenic Area, and the U.S. Forest Service manages the national forest lands at the higher elevations. 24C 01'7 Mountains Conservancy staff indicate that the National Scenic Area designation provides a relatively low level of conservation protection for Federal lands within its boundaries, allowing ongoing mineral extraction to continue on BLM lands. Designation of the area as a National Monument would allow the BLM to withdraw its lands from mineral development. The BLM would retain responsibility for its approximately 27,000 acres, and the Forest Service would retain responsibility for its approximately 20,000 acres. Conservancy staff have indicated that non-BLM and non -Forest Service lands would not be affected by the National Monument designation. Other Cities' Actions The City of Rancho Mirage has adopted a resolution supporting the National Monument designation. According to Rancho Mirage staff, other than the Ritz Carlton golf course, there is not any remaining developable land adjacent to the proposed National Monument area in Rancho Mirage. The Cities of Palm Desert and Indian Wells have agendized consideration of this matter for their April 1 °` City Council meetings. An update on their actions will be given at the City Council meeting. According to Palm Desert and Indian Wells staff, there are not undeveloped lands adjacent to the proposed National Monument area in their respective Cities. The City of Cathedral City considered this issue at their last City Council meeting, and continued it for further review. City of Cathedral City staff indicated that the City Council was concerned that the National Monument designation may have an adverse impact on ecotoursim by limiting or eliminating bike tours/trails and jeep tours. In addition, the Agua Caliente Band of Indians has land within the City, and expressed concern regarding the potential impact of the designation upon their Tribal Land. Cathedral City staff subsequently met with the Tribal Council, and the Council expressed concern regarding the potential limitation the designation may have upon Tribal Lands in the Coachella Valley. The City of Palm Springs staff indicated that this issue is not scheduled to appear before their City Council at this time due to current litigation concerning mountain/foothill areas. According to Palm Springs staff, there is developable land adjacent to the proposed National Monument area in Palm Springs. There has been discussion in Palm Springs regarding efforts to have all affected parties in Palm Springs, including the business community and environmentalists, define and agree upon the development boundaries and potential National Monument boundaries within Palm Springs as a precursor to formal Council consideration of the matter. City of Indio staff indicated that they had not received a request from the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy to consider this issue. 247 u18 Possible Advantages and Disadvantages Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy staff indicate the advantages of National Monument designation for the Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains include: • Providing more stature to the mountains, thereby enhancing the BLM's chances of continuing to attract Land and Water Conservation Fund appropriations for acquisitions in the mountains. This increased stature could also help in attracting grant, foundation, and State funds. Such funding would assist in acquisition of land from willing sellers that could resolve key land use conflicts between development interests and conservation concerns. • Obtaining Congressional designation for the Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains enhances the ability to secure federal acquisition funds, and funding will be key to the successful implementation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. • Strengthening the area's appeal for ecotourism with a National Park on one side of the Coachella Valley and a National Monument on the other side. Potential concerns or disadvantages of a National Monument designation for the Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains that have been discussed include: • Comments related to the National Monument designation may be received on future projects adjacent to the proposed designation area in La Quinta (similar to comments received on the Eagle Mountain Landfill project because of its proximity to Joshua Tree National Park). There are a number of undeveloped sites in La Quinta adjacent to the proposed National Monument area including sites owned by the La Quinta Arts Foundation, KSL, Travertine, Saint Francis of Assisi Church, City of La Quinta, Coachella Valley Water District, and U.S. Homes. • Additional buffers may be requested from future projects adjacent to the proposed designation area in La Quinta. With the Travertine project, BLM/Fish & Game conditioned the developer to dedicate a 200-foot buffer around the Martinez Slide during the project approval process. Prior to submitting the project for approval, the developer had purchased the piece of land containing the Martinez Slide from the BLM in exchange for sites in the mountains, and felt their responsibility for mitigation had been met. U 119 • Potential adverse impact on ecotourism by limiting or eliminating bike tours/trails, jeep tours and hiking tours/trails. • Potential loss of local land use control. Proposed Legislation Sections 4(b) and 4(c) of the proposed legislation attempt to alleviate concerns regarding the affect of ,the National Monument designation on land interests and buffer zones. Original language included in Section 4(b), Indian Reservation, State and Private Lands and Interests Not Affected, of the proposed legislation indicates that "the establishment of the National Monument shall not affect any Indian Reservation, State or privately owned lands or interests in lands." However, the legislation does not specifically reference municipal or other publicly owned land as not being affected. Alternative language was developed following concerns raised by the Building Industry Association regarding the potential affect of the designation on private property. Additional local protection might be provided if local jurisdictions participated in the process of establishing the National Monument boundaries, and if the legislation included a reference that publicly owned land would not be affected by the National Monument designation. Section 4(c), Buffer Zones, of the proposed legislation states that "Congress does not intend for the designation of the National Monument... to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer zones around this National Monument." Staff requested a copy of a map depicting the proposed National Monument boundaries from the Mountains Conservancy. As of this writing, a copy of this map has not been received. Staff has included a Resolution in support of the National Monument Designation consistent with the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy request for Council consideration. Conservancy staff have indicated that they will be present at the Council meeting to answer any questions on this issue. 249 U20 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting the designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument; or 2. Continue consideration of the designation pending provision of further information and/or amendments to the proposed legislation enhancing safeguards for municipal lands and authority; or 3. Do not support the designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager Attachments: 1. Memo Dated 2/23/99 and Letter Dated 3/16/99 from the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy 2. Preliminary Draft of National Monument Legislation 2J-0 u21 RESOLUTION NO. 99- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT WHEREAS, the federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service on the desert slopes of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain a wealth of natural features including the dramatic San Jacinto escarpment rising abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, incorporating five Life Zones from Sonoran Desert to Arctic Alpine; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains provide the scenic backdrop for the Coachella Valley communities and are an important economic resource for the area's tourist economy; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains also contain nationally significant cultural sites, including village sites, trails, and other evidence of habitation by Cahuilla Indians; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains are an important recreational resource for residents and visitors alike; and WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain exceptional biological diversity; and WHEREAS, as urban development has increased and continues to increase in the Coachella Valley and throughout Southern California, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains have become increasingly important as a natural treasure in close proximity to millions of urban residents and countless visitors from all over the world. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE that the City recognizes the importance of protecting this magnificent and unique resource and supports the establishment of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in order to preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, and scientific values found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, California, as an enduring legacy of our heritage, and to secure for future generations the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, wildlife, landforms, and natural and cultural resources in these mountains. 25.E 0 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6' day of April, 1999 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 252 u23 State of California In partnership to protect our mountain heri i I . Memorandum u `'` 1i — 31999 CITY OF LA ppUINTA CITY MANAGER'S DEFT. To: Mayors, City Managers, and Members of the Energy and Environment Committee From: Bill Havert, Executive Director Date: 02/23/99 . Re: Potential designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument The Conservancy is exploring the possible designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument. Currently, the BLM portion of the mountains is a National Scenic Area, established administratively in 1990 by then Secretary of the Interior Manuel Lujan. Congressional designation of a National monument would provide more stature to the mountains and enhance BLM's chances of continuing to attract Land and Water Conservation Fund appropriations for acquisitions in the mountains. Ecotourism would also be enhanced in the Coachella Valley by having a National Park on one side of the valley and a National Monument on the other. It is appropriate that such a Congressional designation would include U.S. Forest Service lands up to the ridgeline of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains. At present, the Scenic Area boundary stops at the national forest boundary, applying only to BLM land. If the area were designated as a National Monument, BLM would retain management responsibility for its lands, and the Forest Service for its lands. Non BLM and non Forest Service lands would not be affected by the designation. If we seek Congressional action, it could be a companion to a larger effort for the Coachella Valley to participate in the Administration's FY 2000 Livability Agenda to promote open space protection. The Livability Program could provide still more opportunities to obtain funding for conservation in the Coachella Valley. Certainly, with our track record of successful problem -solving and inter -agency cooperation, the Coachella Valley may be the perfect place to implement the livability agenda as a model. Clearly, funding will be a key to the successful implementation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species IIabitat Conservation Plan. Obtaining Congressional designation for the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains enhances our ability to secure federal 253 P.O. Box 2855 • Palm Desert, CA 92261.2855 • 760-776.5026 • Fax 760-776.9698 , 6 02 February 23, 1999 acquisition funds and strengthens the area's appeal for development and tourism. We have been quite successful in attracting federal acquisition funds in recent years, but we will need to be even more successful in the coming years if we are to fund implementation of the Plan adequately. Increasing the stature of the area can also help us in attracting grant and foundation funds, as well as state funds. Legislation will need to be introduced in the next month or so to receive serious consideration by Congress this year. Please review the attached draft and let me know if your city (or county) will support or be neutral on such a legislative proposal. I would be pleased to meet with you or attend a Council or Board of Supervisors meeting to answer questions. I can be reached at (909) 765-6250. l)25 COACHELIA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY State of California In partnership to protect our mountain heritage Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail cotxmlrw aoard March 16,1999 d �� ay of cartedra ay t all a! Desert Flu Sprl►wB aw ay mxs- ►&w 8 OwofLAQuilm aty oi Pwrn Desert Tom Genovese Ow CVPwmAwkws CITY Of LA OUIhTA awalRondtoMkw City Manager CITY MAn'AGER'S DEPT. catxtr WS APPOMM City of La Quinta state wrote "PPOWW P.O. Box 1504 su y APPOWM La uuitaCA 92253 Rlutrslde Couuy SW-*- Q , DLsrlu 0 DJSW IV Dear Mr. Genovese: rCauoue Band rctrw,uw rtd= Puff cn teaeo Of w„ This letter is a follow up to a memo sent to you on February 23, 1999 with BtrewQfLaid Mana9a►tm► regard to the potential designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a U.S. Forest Seruke National Monument. I understand that this matter has been reviewed by the City W*We Conservation Board State � of Council. At this time I would like to request that the matter be place on the next nsh LWuesalty o/ CaWbaw council agenda, on Tuesday, April 6. We would like to ask Congresswoman Mary Bono "bd N rt Of e l Reso l"tt` to introduce legislation in the next month or so to receive serious consideration by and Natural Re501rCtS RMOUICES noenav Congress this year. Toward that end, we would like to ask that the City Council support the designation of the Santa Rosa Mountains as a National Monument and authorize a letter to be sent in support of the proposed legislation. There are many significant benefits associated with the potential for a Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, including. ♦ Enhanced ability to secure federal funds to acquire important scenic mountainous lands and significant habitat for the endangered peninsular bighorn sheep and other wildlife. ♦ Funding to support the successful implementation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. ♦ Support for acquisition of land from willing sellers that could resolve key land use conflicts between development interests and conservation concerns. ♦ Economic benefits to the Coachella Valley, already bordered by Joshua Tree National Park to the north, with visibility of a national monument to the south. Tourism, especially ecotourism, would certainly benefit as a result. With many potential benefits, the proposed national monument would not change existing local authority with regard to these open space lands. The proposed legislation specifically limits .the designation to federal lands. All private, state, tribal, 2 5 J P.O. Box 2855 • Palm Desen, CA 92261-2855 9 760-776-5026 9 Fax 760-776-9698 u 2 6 March 16,1999 City of La Quinta and other public land would be excluded from the designation. With the exception of a likely withdrawal of BLM lands from mineral development, management of BLM and U.S. Forest Service lands would remain essentially the same. I have enclosed for your review the most recent version of the draft legislation. Several changes have been made to the version sent to you February 23. I would suggest you review Section 4 which addresses issues relevant to non-federal lands and may be of particular interest. I would be pleased to meet with you or attend a Council meeting to answer any questions. I would also appreciate it very much if you could contact me at your earliest convenience regarding any outstanding issues of concern that may have been expressed by the City Council members. I would like to assess all of the potential concerns and the general level of support for the proposal as soon as possible. Also, please let me know if there is any reason this item could not be brought before the Council at their next meeting. I can be reached at (909) 765-6250. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Bill Havert Executive Director cc: Mayor John Pena 'Members of the City Council Saundra Juhola, City Clerk Dawn Honeywell, City Attorney 256 o27 j+1 p-1L (01 k-11-1 ATTACHMENT 2 PRELIMINAR Y DRAFT OF NATIONAL MONUMENT LEGISLATION (3115199) A BILL To establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of California, and for related purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 1999". SEC. 2. FINDINGS. The Congress finds the following: (1) The federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service in the State of California, County of Riverside, on the desert slopes of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain a wealth of natural features including the dramatic San Jacinto escarpment rising abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, incorporating five Life Zones from Sonoran Desert to Arctic Alpine. (2) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains provide the scenic backdrop for the Coachella Valley communities and are an important economic resource for the area's tourist economy. The mountains provide stunning vistas enjoyed by residents and visitors from all over the world. Many miles of trails and a wilderness area provide diverse recreational and interpretive opportunities. A Visitors Center staffed by the Bureau of Land Management and volunteers was established through a cooperative effort between the local community and the Bureau. The Palm Springs aerial tram, operated by the Winter Park Authority, takes hundreds of thousands of visitors annually from the desert floor to the pine forest at over 8,000'. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians operates the Indian Canyons Heritage Park, which also attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors annually to enjoy the canyon streams and verdant palm oases. State Route 74, which traverses the mountains, has been designated a Scenic Highway by the state and a National Scenic Byway by the Forest Service, and is known as the Palms to Pines Highway. In 1896, John Muir wrote about his climb to the peak, "The view from San Jacinto is the most sublime spectacle to be found anywhere on this earth." Ansel Adams once photographed the splendors of Deep Canyon. 257 u28 (3) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains also contain nationally significant cultural sites, including village sites, trails, and other evidence of habitation by Cahuilla Indians. These sites remain of significance to the Cahuilla people. (4) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains contain exceptional biological diversity, providing habitat for a number of state and federally listed endangered or threatened species, including the magnificent peninsular bighorn sheep, the least Bell's vireo, the southwestern willow flycatcher, the desert slender salamander, and the desert tortoise. Many other important species of native wildlife also inhabit the area, including golden eagle and prairie falcon. In addition, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains are dotted with native fan palm oases, including Palm Canyon, the largest fan palm oasis in the country, with more than 6,000 palm trees. (5) The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains are geologically the oldest and highest part of the Southern California Batholith, the uplift of which from millennia of activity on the San Andreas fault system formed the Peninsular Range that stretch nearly 1,000 miles from the San Jacinto Mountains southward through Baja California. Dramatic features include the San Jacinto escarpment, seventeen -mile long Palm Canyon, and Deep Canyon. (6) The Bureau of Land Management manages Public Lands in the lower elevations of the mountains in an area designated by the Secretary of the Interior in 1990 as the Santa Rosa Mountains National Scenic Area. A portion of the Scenic Area was designated by law as an addition to the Santa Rosa Mountains Wilderness in 1994. The United States Forest Service manages federal lands at the higher elevations, including that portion of the Santa Rosa Wilderness designated in 1984. The Santa Rosa Indian Reservation and the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation occur at higher and lower elevations, respectively. State agencies also have significant management responsibilities in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. The California Department of Parks and Recreation manages Mount San Jacinto, State Park at the highest elevations of the San Jacinto Mountains. The California Department of Fish and Game manages several ecological reserves and a wildlife area in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. The University of California maintains the Philip A. Boyd Desert Research Center (hereinafter referred to as the "Boyd Center"), a component of the University's Natural Reserve System, for research and educational use by faculty and students, and for limited public outreach purposes. The mission of the Natural Reserve System is to contribute to the understanding and wise management of the earth and its natural systems by supporting university level teaching, research, and public service at protected natural areas throughout California. More recently, the state established the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy to acquire and protect lands in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains and provide for the public's enjoyment and appreciation of them. Several of the Coachella Valley cities and the County of 258 629 Riverside have acquired lands in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains to protect their open space values. (7) As urban development has increased and continues to increase in the Coachella Valley and throughout southern California, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains have become increasingly important as a natural treasure in close proximity to millions of urban residents and countless visitors from all over the world. The local communities, and state and federal agencies recognize the importance of protecting this magnificent and unique resource, and desire to work together to manage the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains to maintain a dynamic and fully functioning ecosystem in perpetuity, conserving natural and cultural resources and maintaining opportunities for compatible scientific, recreational, social, and cultural activities. SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL MONUMENT. (a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSES. - In order to preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, and scientific values found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, California, as an enduring legacy of our heritage, and to secure for future generations the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, wildlife, landforms, and natural and cultural resources in these mountains, there is hereby designated the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument. The National Monument is comprised of approximately acres as generally depicted on a map entitled 'Boundary Map, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto National Monument", dated 1999. (b) MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. - As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall file a map and legal description of the National Monument designated by this Act with the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate. Such map and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary, as appropriate, may correct clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and map and make minor revisions in the boundary of the National Monument. Such map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management and the Chief of the Forest Service (hereinafter referred to as the "Director and the Chief') in the District of Columbia and at agency offices in Sacramento, Vallejo, Riverside, Palm Springs, San Bernardino, and Idyllwild, California. SEC. 4. MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL LANDS WITHIN THE NATIONAL MONUMENT (a) IN GENERAL. - Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary shall manage their respective federal lands within the National Monument consistent with the purpose described in Section 3(a) and Sections 4 and 5 of this Act and all applicable federal law. 259 o30 3 (b) INDIAN RESERVATION, STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS AND INTERESTS NOT AFFECTED. - The establishment of the National Monument shall not affect any Indian Reservation, State or privately owned lands or interests in lands. The Secretary shall have no authority on non-federal lands within the National Monument not already provided by law. [Alternative language: Unless and until acquired by the United States, no lands within the boundaries of the National Monument that are owned by any person or entity other than the United States shall be subject to any rules or regulations applicable solely to the Federal Lands within such boundaries and may be used to the extent allowed by applicable law] (c) NO BUFFER ZONES - The Congress does not intend for the designation of the National Monument designated in Section 3 of this Act to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer zones around this National Monument. The fact that activities or uses can be seen or heard from areas within the National Monument shall not, of itself, preclude such activities or uses up to the boundary of this National Monument. (d) DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN. - The Secretary, in cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Department of Parks and Recreation, the University of California through its Natural Reserve System, the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy, the Winter Park Authority, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, the County of Riverside, and the cities with land use and land management responsibilities in these mountains, shall, by not later than four years of the enactment of this Act, prepare a management plan consistent with this Act and with the conservation, enhancement, and protection of the National Monument. The Secretary may from time to time thereafter make such revisions as are necessary to ensure that consistency following consultation with representatives of various governmental entities and other groups listed in this subsection. (e) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS. - The Secretary may, consistent with the management plan and existing authorities, enter into cooperative agreements, shared management arrangements, or special use permits with any person for the purposes of management, interpretation, and research of the National Monument's resources. The existing cooperative agreement between the University of California through its Natural Reserve System and the Bureau of Land Management, and the existing special use permits between the University of California through its Natural Reserve System and the United States Forest Service shall not be affected by this Act. SEC. 5. LAND ACQUISITION. (a) LAND ACQUISITION. - The Secretary may acquire nongovernment, privately owned lands and interests therein within the National Monument by donation, by exchange, or by purchase with the consent of the owner thereof. The Secretary may accept, receive, hold, administer, and use any gift, devise, or bequest, absolutely or in 260 631 14 trust, or real or personal property, including any income from or interest in property or any funds, for management of the National Monument for the purposes for which the National Monument is established under section 3(a). (b) MANAGEMENT. - Lands or interests therein within the National Monument so acquired by the United States shall, after such acquisition, be incorporated into and managed as part of the National Monument. SEC. 6 WITHDRAWAL; MINERAL DEVELOPMENT. (a) WITHDRAWAL. - Subject to valid existing rights, all Federal lands within the conservation area, including all lands or interests acquired by the United States after the date of enactment of this Act, are hereby withdrawn from all forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws and from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws of the United States. SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act. SEC. S. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (a) NATIONAL MONUMENT. - The term "National Monument" means the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument designated under section 3(a). (b) SECRETARY. - The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture. (c) THE ACT. - The term refers to the "Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 1999". (d) FEDERAL LANDS. - Public lands defined in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and National Forest Lands as defined ....................... 2 6.- U312 R5E SANTA ROSA WILDERNESS AREA MAP 11 Wilderness Area State 0 1 2 3 Miles T5S T6S T(IS 7 7 S T7S 7 as TSS 79S T9S �7EIR8E SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN 262; u33 ... . . ...... October 1994 The Desert Sun Friday, December 17, 1999 :..0pjn1on. OUR VOICE ...Balance needed .. on monument Bono's bill best chance we -have to satisfy all interests It is no longer a question of whether vast stretches of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto mountains will be declared a national monument. It's not even really a question of when anymore, now that the Clinton administration has said it wants to see the designation bestowed sometime in early 2000. • But -exactly how that designation will come about n — that question most definitely remains. . And there is only one answer to it. The only way to secure national -monument status under terms most acceptable .to all local .parties is through legislation that must be a mon- ument itself to coalition and compromise. And the only person who can ensure those conditions are - met is Rep Mary Bono. Bono is drafting a bill to be introduced when Congress reconvenes next month that will set the parameters for the upgraded designation of 140,000 acres now classified as a national scenic area. It would be a boon for the valley because national -monument status would give the federal government incentive to continue providing funds for public land acquisitions, a practice that has seen $11 million funneled through the Bureau of Land Management since 1990 but which appears now to be drying up. More federally backed public land buys, in turn, would provide private landowners with a financially = viable alternative to a showdown with environ- mental groups and government agencies over land pie, allowing them to simply sell their land to BLM for a fair price. Despite the proposal's obvious benefits, however, there has been not -insubstantial disagreement over : where the monument's boundaries should be : drawn and much concern about the limitations the :.fie* status might put on projects planned for the • valley's hillsides. The city of Palm Springs has asked to be ex- empted from the monument boundary, worrying the designation would jeopardize completion of the already approved Shadowrock resort and The Preserve at Mountain Falls. The Desert Chapter of the Building Industry Association of Southern California has similar worries that its ability to undertake future hillside developments will be threatened. These are legitimate concerns - anon" Sono seems committed to address fairly. She has said more than once that she understands how vital tourism is to the valley's well-being, and in turn how vital hillside development has been to tourism. At the very least, that acknowledgment must lead her to provide for the completion of projects that already have gotten a green light. But does that mean Bono will or even should capitulate to every other exemption or provision being requested? Certainly not. The congress- woman also understands how vital preserving open spaces is to the well-being of the valley, and those interests must likewise be protected. Striking a balance between the two interests is the charge before Bono. It will not be an easy task, and not everyone is likely to see everything they'd like to see in the legislation she produces. : - But even if small concessions must be made, the fact remains that Bono's bill is the best chance that all sides will get most of what they want. If her legislation stalls due to entrenched special -interest haggling, Clinton will supersede her attempts and issue the designation by way of executive brder. If that is allowed to happen, no :local .envi- ronmentalist, developer or government will have, -the slightest say in the boundaries and policies' established. And that would be a virtual guarantee of con- ditions that will deeply upset somebody. 26$J 634 us Y�IYMsf i/IIIIY011 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SANTA ROSA MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS SIZE: 64,340 acres, which may include other Federal, State and private lands LOCATION: Riverside County; 7 miles south of Palm Springs, California (Note: Boundary set backs from roads or trails are 30 to 300 feet) NATURAL RESOURCES: The terrain within the Santa Rosa Mountains Wilderness is rugged with elevations rising dramatically from just above sea level to 7,000 feet. Laced with deep washes and shallow drainages, the area supports a variety of riparian streams which flow year-round. Here, desert and mountain environments blend together to form unique plant habitats, which thrive in riparian oases. The Santa Rosas are strewn with boulders. The steep canyon walls have been eroded by springs and streams. Bear Creek Oasis, Lost Canyon Oasis, GWidelupe Canyon, Devil Canyon and Rockhouse Canyon are all found within this wilderness. Many of these areas provide important lambing habitat for bighorn sheep. The Santa Rosa Mountains support the largest herd of Peninsular bighorn sheep in the United States. Mule deer can be found throughout the coniferous forests growing along the higher elevations of the range. Great horned owl, prairie falcon and golden eagle nest and forage throughout the entire wilderness. Reptiles, including frogs, toads and the desert slender salamander also live in this desert setting. ACCESS: State Highway 74 provides access to the Santa Rosa Mountains from the north and State Highway 86 and surface streets from the east. NONFEDERAL LANDS: Private lands may lie within the wilderness area. Please respect the landowner and do not use these lands without permission. MAPS: Desert Access Guides: USGS 7.5 Quadrangle Maps: Palm Springs -417 Clark Lake North East, Indio, McCain Valley - #19 .. La Quinta, Martinez Mountain, Rabbit Peak, and Valerie. CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management Palm Springs -South Coast California Desert District Resource Area 6221 Box Springs Boulevard 63-500 Garnet Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 P.O. Box 2000 (909) 697-5200 N. Palm Springs, CA 92258 (619) 251-4800 . 264'1 These are not the official congressional maps. For detailed information, please refer to the redrafted legislative maps available in all BLM offices. ATTACHMENT 2 REQUEST THAT CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIFY ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATION December 17, 1999 Request that the City of La Quinta change its position and not support the creation of a National Monument for the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains unless the legislation is changed from the original draft prepared by the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. The legislation to be - prepared by Congresswoman Bono's office should include the safeguards needed to protect the business community and recreational users. We ask the City of La Quinta take the following action: OPPOSE THE DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT UNLESS THE LEGISLATION CONTAINS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: [Numbers of the paragraphs below are keyed to the corresponding text in the attached draft legislation.] (1) A clear statement of the intent of the legislation. It must include wording about Congress not intending that the National Monument interfere in any way with development on the Valley floor and recreation in the mountains. The intent must also prohibit any attempt to impose mitigation on Valley development because of the National Monument creation. (2) The set aside of land for the National Monument would be done to facilitate and assist land development in the remaining areas of the Coachella Valley. 265 National Monument December 17, 1999 Page 2 (3) Before the National Monument Act can be considered by Congress, a precise map and legal description of the boundaries of the National Monument must be prepared and then made available for public comment for a period not less than 60 days. Changes maybe made to the map based on this public review. (4) Boundaries for the National Monument shall exclude (i) any land on the desert floor, (ii) any land within the existing boundary of any City and (iii) any land that is not a minimum 900 feet up or back from the toe of slope. This would remove the boundary from the desert floor and provide some buffer between the Monument and development. (5) There are no buffer zones of any type around the National Monument and the Act is to include wording that says the National Monument designation absolutely will not preclude land uses, lighting and noise of any kind from occurring around and immediately adjacent to the boundary of the National Monument. (6) The existence of a National Monument designation shall not itself constitute an environmental impact when projects are reviewed under NEPA and CEQA. (7) Prohibition against .governmental entities requiring as a condition for development approvals any development impact fees or land dedications to be used toward creation or maintenance of the National Monument. (8) All lands within the National Monument will remain open for all forms of recreational uses subject to reasonable and normal restrictions that might be imposed by the Secretary. (9) During the period of time needed for development of the Management Plan, no restrictions will be placed on development activities inside or adjacent to the National Monument. 266 — —z13 7 National Monument December 17, 1999 Page 3 (IO)Nothing in the Act shall inhibit or curtail government or public utilities from installing, constructing and maintaining public utilities and infrastructure. (I I) All local and regional governmental agencies retain full jurisdiction over local land use decisions and related procedures and hearings. 267 - 03 8 ATTACHED IS A MODIFIED VERSION OF THE DRAFT LEGISLATION PREPARED AND CIRCULATED BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (CVMC). RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE CVMC DRAFT ARE SHOWN UNDERLINED AND BOLD FACED. NUMBERS IN THE MARGIN OF THE DOCUMENT REFER TO ELEVEN ITEMS OF CONCERN DISCUSSED ON THE COVER SHEETS. 263 MODIFIGA IIUNb INSERTED IN C/MC DRAFT PROPOSAL DRAFT OFNATIONAL MONUMENT LEGISLATION(49499) A BILL To establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of California, and for related purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, PREAMBLE SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 1999". SEC.2. FINDINGS. The Congress finds and declares that: (1) The federal lands on the desert slopes of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains possess a wealth of nationally significant recreational and natural features to be enjoyed by current and future generations; - 1 - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-14-99.DOC 269 MOD/F/CA TANS INSERTED /N Cl/Jl/,C DRAf T�_�OPQS,�_- --- _ u40 (2) The mountains, which rise abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, provide a picturesque backdrop for the Coachella Valley communities and support an abundance of recreational opportunities which are an important regional economic resource; (3) As urban development in the valley has significantly increased, the mountains have become a treasured natural resource visited by millions of nearby urban residents and countless visitors from around the world; (4) This area is exceptionally diverse biologically, containing five distinct "life Zenes zones" from Sonoran Desert to Arctic Alpine, and provides habitat for numerous state and federally listed threatened or endangered species, including the peninsular bighorn sheep, the last Bell's vireo, the southwestern willow flycatcher, the desert slender salamander, and the desert tortoise. (5) The unique, natural, cultural, educational, scientific, and recreational values of all or a portion of the area have been recognized nationally through designations such as the Santa Rosa Mountains National Scenic Area, the Santa Rosa Wilderness, the Santa Rosa and Agua Caliente Indian Reservations, and the establishment of the Mount San Jacinto State Park, Philip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Research Center, Department of Fish and Game ecological reserves, and the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. (6) The mountains have special cultural value to the Cahuilla people, containing significant cultural sites, including village sites, trails, petroglyphs, and other evidence of their habitation. (8) The continued economic strength of the region is essential to the objective of this Act. Congress recognizes that private development is an integral part of sustaining the region's strength and the long-term preservation of the environmental resources identified in this Act. One of the primary purposes of this Act is to set aside land to be included in #2) the National Monument in order to facilitate and assist land development in other areas of the Coachella Valley. Nothing in this Act should be interpreted to discourage, prohibitor in any degree inhibit reasonable development, as determined by the appropriate local agencv with land use jurisdiction, of non -federally owned lands outside, inside, adjacent to. or abutting the boundaries of the National Monument. - 2 - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-14-99.DOC 270 641 _. SEC. 3 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL MONUMENT. (a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSES. - In order to preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, educational, and scientific values found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, California, as an enduring legacy of our heritage, and to secure for future generations the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, wildlife, landforms, and natural and cultural resources in these mountains, there is hereby designated the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument. Within the boundaries of the National Monument, there are approximately 280,009 aefes „f-wh:e,, t e 1 Y e a e�r:-q r d- 1—_Laz,d_ acres, which are as generally depicted on a map entitled Boundary Map, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto National Monument," dated Maw-39, 44P (b) MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. -As seen as pFae4eable af4er- the da4 eaaetfnent of this Act, the Sees.-5, shall Included as part of this Act is a map depicting the boundaries of the National Monument and a legal description of such (#3) boundaries. The boundaries of the National Monument and legal description were N description 4for the National Monument a map and legal - 3 - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-I4-99.DOC 27 Secretary, as appropriate, may correct clerical and typographical errors in The boundary of the National Monument-Sueh map federal and state law. The map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management and the Chief of the Forest Service (hereinafter referred to as the "Director and the Chief) in the District of Columbia and at agency offices in Sacramento, Vallejo, Riverside, Palm Springs, San Bernardino, and Idyllwild, California. SEC. 4. MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL LANDS WITHIN THE NATIONAL MONUMENT. (a) MANAGEMENT. - Subject to existing rights, the Secretary shall manage the federal lands within the National Monument consistent with the purpose described in Section 3(a) and Sections 4 and 5 of this Act and all applicable federal law. (b) INDIAN RESERVATION, STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS AND INTERESTS NOT AFFECTED. - The establishment of the National Monument shall not affect any Indian Reservation, State, City, County, special district, or privately owned lands or interests in lands. The Secretary shall have no authority on non-federal lands within the National Monument not already provided by law. (c) NO BUFFER ZONES. - The c�-ens dee-s ifie* im+eaa f - the, designation of this National Monument to lead se by Congress specifically prohibits the creation of any type of protective perimeters or buffer zones around this National Monument. The fact that anv and all activities uses-. uses, lighting and noise of anv kind can be seen or heard from ass anv I_u f 5) area within the National Monument sli 4 absolutely will not, r preclude such activities and/or up to the boundary of this National Monument. -4- NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-13-99.DOC 27" (d) NO IMPACT TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. - The existence of the National Monument shall not itself constitute an environmental impact for purposes of consideration of development projects or other human -related activity under statutory (#6) environmental analvsis schemes including the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.A..§§ 432iet se r the alifQrnl!a nliEg—x mentala uali ct _ _._.. _ _ _ _ h'_�►_ California PublicjResources Code:§§ 21 0 t s g, CIMAa. (e) PROHIBITION OF NATIONAL MONUMENT EXACTIONS. - No (#7) governmental entity, as a condition of project approval for any land development application, may impose development impact fees or require dedication of land to be used towards creation or maintenance of the National Monument. �f (4) DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN. - The Secretary, in cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Department of Parks and Recreation, the University of California through its Natural Reserve System, the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy, the Winter Park Authority, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, the County of Riverside, and the cities with land use and land management responsibilities in these mountains, shall, by not later than four years of the enactment of this Act, prepare a management plan consistent with this Act and with the conservation, enhancement, and protection of the National Monument. The Secretary may from time to time thereafter make such revisions as are necessary to ensure that consistency following consultation with representatives of various governmental entities and other groups listed in this subsection. The management plan shall include provisions authorizing public (#8) access to the National Monument land for, including without limitation, hiking, camping, mountain biking, sightseeing and horseback riding. Until the management plan is prepared and adopted, the fact that it has not been so prepared and adopted shall have no j #9) impact whatsoever upon any activity which may take place either inside or outside the ` boundaries of the National Monument area. _W(o COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS. - The Secretary may, consistent with the management plan and existing authorities, enter into cooperative agreements, shared management arrangements, or special use permits with any person for the purposes of management, interpretation, and research of the National Monument's resources. The Secretary - S - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12.13-99.DOC 27n u44 shall, consistent with the management plan and existing authorities, either revise agreement(s) with the University of California existing as of the enactment of this Act relating to the University's use of certain federal lands within the National Monument as may be necessary to ensure consistency with this Act, or enter into a new agreement(s), to ensure the continuation of the University's and lands research and educational activities within this National Monument. Nothing in this Act or the Secretary's management plan shall inhibit or curtail the ability of government agencies or public utility companies to install, construct. (#1 U) and maintain public utilities and infrastructure as required for the public health, safety and welfare. (h) _ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONTINUED LOCAL AND REGIONAL -- GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION. - Nothing in this Act shall impinge or compromise in (#11) any way the Jurisdiction of local and regional governmental agencies over local land use ` decisions and related procedures and hearings. SEC. 5. LAND ACQUISITION. (a) LAND ACQUISITION. - The Secretary may acquire non -government, privately owned lands and interests therein within the National Monument by donation, by exchange, or by purchase with the consent of the owner thereof. The Secretary may accept, receive, hold, administer, and use any gift, devise, or bequest, absolutely or in trust, of real or personal property, including any income from or interest in property or any funds, for management of the National Monument for the purposes for which the National Monument is established under section 3(a). (b) MANAGEMENT. - Lands or interests therein within the National Monument so acquired by the United States shall, after such acquisition, be incorporated into and managed as part of the National Monument. SEC. 6. WITHDRAWAL; MINERAL DEVELOPMENT. (a) WITHDRAWAL. - Subject to *alit existing rights, mineral development concerns and interests on all Federal lands within the conservation area, including all lands or interests acquired by the United States after the date of enactment of this Act, are hereby withdrawn from all forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws and from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws of the United States, subject to appeal provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.SC.A. §§ 500 et.seq. - f - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-14-".WC REG7 SEC 7. NO CREATION OF ANY CAUSE OF ACTION. approval of anv land use applications which it may consider. SEC 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act. SEC. & 9. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (a) NATIONAL MONUMENT. - The term "National Monument" means the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument designated under section 3(a). (b) SECRETARY. - The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture. (c) THE ACT. - The term refers to the "Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Act of 1999". (d) FEDERAL LANDS. - Public lands defined in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and National Forest Lands as defined in the Creative Act of March 3, 1891, the Act of March 1, 1911, the General Exchange Act of March 20, 1972, the Forest Receipts Act of June 15, 1938, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965. - 7 - NATIONAL MONUMENT TEXT 12-14-99.DOC 275 id CITY CITY MAMA fl E�: 1,151 -200C cc 5 G- S 'cvIC '17g e'r7 Go o tcx- (-u et r, t tu 9 c o -Fo r- the -,;::t r-) -66, 0- 'San �c C-11 t0 0 L) rl t "'I S 4 -6 l'o t-) 0 C,' J--k-7 L) C, A cs e- c) c -Pcl cz s 60 n )Oyj L) �loc io o T /c a5c res /O WOOld -to bE c- V- C o (--s 0 U Ievc 1�1-f Shoe I� be 4=1 here- ev nafvra 27 ft'env Morn 1<5 c c V, C c ri 13 c f wY �. i � � •""tYi R/ �yb39 K�CD ' i i TM N W m 2 N J � N Q'cc aO <mdLx au i + Fxwa Wm>~ U;c o 'amd ma 277 c&h. 4 4a Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Discussion of Fairway Advertising's Proposed PUBLIC HEARING: Amendment to the City's Billboard Regulations RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This matter was before the City Council on October 5, 1999 (Attachment 1), at which time staff was given direction to work with Morris Communications to find out what they could do to make billboard signs more attractive and less of a visual blight. Staff was further directed to research the requirements to modify the current ordinance regulating billboard signs, as well as any associated legal issues. On December 131h, a letter was received from Mr. Edward M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, a division of Morris Communications, identifying seven suggestions relating to outdoor advertising structures (Attachment 2). The suggestions included in the letter are as follows: 1. The number of outdoor advertising structures within the City of La Quinta as of January 1, 1999 be inventoried (Sign Inventory) and capped such that no greater number of such structures may ever exist within the City. 2. The structures within the Sign Inventory may be modified and maintained in such a manner so as to improve their general aesthetics, structural soundness and overall appearance consistent with Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the Council. 278 CCJH.00a 3. Structures within the Sign inventory which are required to be removed for whatever reason may be relocated within the nonresidential overlay of the regional commercial and community commercial zones only. 4. All structures shall be spaced at a minimum of 500 feet from any other structure on the same side of the street, consistent with California Law. 5. The overall height shall not exceed 35 feet above road grade or base of sign whichever is greater. 6. Setbacks for the structures would be as follows: a. Front = 20 feet from street right of way b. Side = 10 feet from property line\ 7. The overall dimension in gross square footage of the sign shall not exceed 378 feet, excluding extended advertising, with the copy. The extended advertising copy ("cut-outs") shall not exceed 25 percent of gross square footage. At the Council meeting of October 5th,. staff identified that off -premise, billboard, outdoor advertising signs are prohibited within the City. They are allowed to be maintained in their current state; however, if removed, they cannot be relocated. This policy has been in effect since May 1, 1984. Some billboards have been relocated due to street widening or actions due to settlement agreements between individual property owners along Highway 1 1 1, the City, and sign companies. The City, in 1998, adopted the Highway 1 1 1 Landscape Design Guidelines establishing standards for the 50 foot setback along Highway 1 1 1. In essence, the Guidelines set out the requirements for the landscaping palette and sidewalk configuration along the entire length of Highway 111 in La Quinta. Within this setback, buildings are not permitted to intrude; however, parking spaces have been permitted to encroach within the setback. In the Fall of 1999, staff completed a photo inventory of the billboard signs along Highway 1 1 1 (Attachment 3). There currently exists 11 billboards along Highway 1 1 1. As can be seen in the photos, most of the structures are located within the 50 foot landscape setback or the right of way needed for Highway 1 1 1 widening. Ten of the billboards range in size from approximately 214 to 338 square feet and one billboard is 537 square feet in size. The proposed revisions would permit a maximum sign of 15.13 by 25 feet which equates to 378 square feet in.size. The proposed revisions would allow ten of the existing 11 signs to be enlarged. Currently, the City of La Quinta does not require the removal of billboards when development occurs along Highway 1 1 1. Any sign removal is between the property owner and the sign company. Under current regulations, if the property owner has the sign removed, the sign could not be relocated within the City. U�)n CCJH.00a 270 The State Legislature will be considering a proposed bill to allow a City to have billboards removed without compensation if the City's amortization process complies with State Law (Attachment 4). The City has sent a letter in support (Attachment 5) of this legislation. The modification of the current regulations would undo years of billboard prohibition within the City and has the potential of affecting the landscape aesthetic the City is now trying to achieve along Highway 1 1 1 . The matter is before you for discussion. Respectfully submitted; Her an iuni Development Director Approved for submission by; Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. October 5, 1999 City Council staff report and minutes. 2. Letter from Mr. Edward M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, a division of Morris Communications, dated December 13, 1999. 3. Sign inventory photos 4. Assembly Bill 483 5. City letter of support for AB 483 CCJH.00a r ,% T-,dtt 4 4v Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: October 5, 1999 Discussion of Regulations Regarding Billboards As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL. IMPLICATIONS: None. None. �iUGR 19 I • ATTACHMENT 1 FILE COPY AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: During the September 7, 1999 City Council meeting, Mayor Pena advised that Morris Communications (Fairway Outdoor Advertising) (Attachment 1) has requested that the City Council schedule a study session to discuss the City's outdoor advertising criteria. Staff has researched the history of the City's regulations regarding outdoor advertising, billboards and off premise Signs. The following is a summary of the actions leading up to our current regulations: 1. On May 1, 1984, the City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance for a 45-day period (May 1, 1984 to June 15, 1984) restricting the erection or construction of any outdoor advertising display or outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign within the City of La Quinta (Ordinance No. 53). 2. On June 5, 1984, the City Council continued the Urgency Ordinance prohibiting outdoor advertising displays, structures, and signs from June 16, 1984 to May 1, 1985 (Ordinance 56). 3. On May 7, 1985, the City Council extended the Urgency Ordinance from May, 281 8, 1985 to May 7, 1986. CCJH.00a ( 0 ( ) 5 4. On September 1, 1987, the City Council adopted a new comprehensive set of sign regulations which prohibited off premise signs. An off premise sign was defined as follows: "A structure which bears a sign which is not appurtenant to the use of the property where the sign is located, or a product sold, or a service offered upon the property where the sign is located, and which does not identify the place of business where the sign is located as a purveyor of the merchandise or services advertised upon the sign. Some temporary signs are not defined as off premise signs as used within this chapter." 5. On April 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 281 which created new sign regulations. These regulations continue to prohibit off premise, billboards, or outdoor advertising signs. Throughout all of these regulations, the City chose to permit existing off premise, outdoor advertising, billboards to remain provided they were not structurally altered or abandoned for more than one year. The current regulations dealing with off premise signs, billboards and outdoor advertising were sent to Mr. M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, on September 23, 1999, as well as notifying him that this issue would be on the October 5th City Council agenda for discussion. The matter is before you for discussion. Respectfully submitted, je ry rifrman CcImmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: AL� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Letter from Mr. Peter Scheurmier, Morris Communications Corporation dated September 7, 1999 2 8 ti uo6 CCJH.00a /�p -07-99 TUE 05:31 PM FLORIDA TIMES UNION FAX NO. 904 359 440 ATTACHMENT 1 - M O RR j S September 7,1999 C01 MINICATIUVS c O . . O 9 R T t 0 .. Via Facsimile PETER SCHEURMIER The Honorable John Pena Vice Presfdenl Mayor, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico OUTDOOR La Quinta„ California 92253 131ROM)CUSTI NC Re: La Quinta Sign Ordinance DIRECT MARKE TI NC Dear Mayor Pena: Following our various meetings and conversations, the purpose of this letter is to request a study session with the I.a Quinta City Council to discuss the City's current sip ordinance as it relates to Fairway Outdoor Advertising's continued relationship With your City. Fairway Outdoor Advertising is 'a division of Morris Communications which owns a number of media/informational platforms in the Coachella Valley. In addition to Fwirway, Morris o Ams the seven -station Desert Radio Group, Best Read Guide, Sutiline Buss Shelter Advertising, as well as soon to be launched internet and direct marketing platforms. ONE RTVK&RIDE AVE. JACISONVILLE FLORIDA 332°= I' airway has been a part of the economic fabric of the City of La Quinta for many years. Our signs both inside and outside your City routinely advertise, promote and direct people to La Quinta businesses, including PGA West, The La Quinta Hotel and numerous single- TEL 9oa.359.4579 family home subdivisions. FAX 904.359.4400 r In addition, our various media platforms promote and support La Quinta businesses and events, both commercial and noncommercial, to provide broad -based coverage to scheurmr@tu.infr.uet residents of the Coachella Valley as a whole, as well as the extremely valuable tourist wWW.M4rriacor MtM community. In short, we help residents and wunsts alike find La Quinta golf courses, hotels, restaurants and events, as well as provide vital information to valley residents and newcomers in finding and purchasing new homes. Modern fechnology, design improvements and creative landscaping allow Fairway to minimize visual impacts associated with outdoor advertising while still preserving the economic benefits associated with driving more people to the City of La Quinta. 28 (108 TOE 05:32 PM FLORIDA TIMES UNION The Honorable John Pena September 7, 1999 Page Two FAX NO, 904 359 4400 P. 03 The Morris mandate to its local operating units is to work with and support the local communities in which, and with which, we do business. i t is in this spirit of cooperation that we respectfully request the opportunity to make a presentation before the La Quinta City Council at its meeting on September 21, 1999 to discuss how Fairway and the City can continue the mutually beneficial relationship. Your consideration of this matter is greatly appreciated. ru�aa cc: William S. Moms, TH Will S. Morris, IV Edward M. Scherer, III James Cato Ferguson, Esquire " n •a City Council Minutes 12 October 5, 1999 MOT oved y ou fund and present a suitable plaque to Fred Simon/Simon Motors to honor the alership's 25th anniversary in La Quinta in an amount not to exceed $3 0 from. the Special Projects Contingency Fund. Motion carried unanimo ly. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-143. 7. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO Clo APT 2.70, SECTIONS 2.70.020 (BOARD MEETINGS) AND 2.70.030 (BOAR FUNCTIONS), OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CO RELATIVE TO THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD. Mr. Falconer, Finance Director, advised that the vestment Advisory Board has reviewed the proposed amendments, and has/recommended adoption. MOTION - It was moved by Council Memb s Sniff/Adolph to take up Ordinance No. 336 by title and number only and aive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 336 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING S CTIONS 2.70.020 (BOARD MEETINGS) AND 2.70.030 (BOARD FUNC ONS) OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE RELAT G TO THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD. It was moved by Coun 1 Members Sniff/Adolph to introduce Ordinance No. 336 on first reyNone on carried by the following vote: AYES: Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Council e�oncurred on taking up Study Session Item No. 2 at this time. 2. DISCUSSION .OF REGULATIONS REGARDING BILLBOARDS. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that in May 1984 the City adopted a 45-day urgency ordinance that restricted outdoor signage, and 28Z ,110 City Council Minutes 13 October 5, 1999 continued it until May 1986. On September 1, 1987, the City adopted new permanent sign regulations which prohibited off -premise signs. The ordinance allowed existing signs to remain, but prohibited them from being modified or structurally altered. The current regulations were adopted on April 2, 1996, and continued the same prohibition and limitations on maintenance and relocation of existing signs. Mayor Pena noted that Morris Communications (Foil way Outdoor Advertising) has asked to make a presentation. Peter Scheurmier, One Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida, Vice President of Advertising for Morris Communications, reviewed the company's background and local business efforts through Fairway and Desert Outdoor Advertising, Sunrise Marketing (bus shelter advertising), and Desert Radio Group. He also introduced several members of their company, and advised that they have seven or eight billboards in La Quinta, along with several advertising signs in bus shelters. PGA West and Rancho La Quinta are their largest commercial clients in the valley. They also support many community events in La Quinta, and are currently erecting two billboards (outside of the City) that advertise the La Quinta Arts Foundation. He then played a CD advertising the La Quinta Arts Foundation. He advised that they wish to be a. part of the City's growth, and believe that they provide a commercial benefit to the City. They're )not asking to construct additional billboards, but rather wish to improve the existing signs, and to use modern. technology and landscaping to help mitigate the impact of billboards. He asked that they be allowed to work with staff to find a way to update, remodel, and relocate their current signs. They wish to develop a plan for an acceptable balance of benefits and burdens associated with outdoor advertising that properly serve the City's interest, support the business community, and to possibly propose changes to the current sign regulations to accommodate preserving a good business balance. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that they are not asking for additional billboards, but rather to be allowed to relocate and/or remodel the existing ones, and to some degree, replace them. The existing billboards are not falling down, but they can make them look more attractive and modernistic. He confirmed that it would be appropriate to add "replace" to their list of proposed changes. Mayor Pena asked if they could provide some "before and after" photographs should they be allowed to update the signs. Mr. Scheurmier advised that they could, and stated that they wish to work with staff to find some acceptable things to present to Council. 4; 'llI City Council Minutes 14 October 5, 1999 In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that the current regulations allow maintenance of the signs, but not structural alterations. That would require an update of the sign regulations. Mr. Scheurmier understood that State law allows the City to ignore its own ordinances if it's in the best interest of the City, specifically as it relates to billboards. They would like to have the ordinance brought forward for possible amendment, and to present their "before and after" photographs at the same time. Council Member Adolph advised that he doesn't support billboards or other major signs on buildings because he feels that they destroy the image that the City is trying to establish. He asked if they would be receptive to relocating their signs to areas where they would not be creating problems aesthetically. Mr. Scheurmier didn't see a problem with it as long as they can stay reasonably within the realm of their overall marketing area. Mayor Pena felt the other sign companies might take advantage of an updated ordinance and improve their billboards as well. He wished to have Morris Communications come back to staff with some preliminary design standards for Council to consider. , Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that they would not come back with a request for additional billboards. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the existing billboards are legal non -conforming uses, and that as development occurs, it's up to the property owners to determine whether or not they wish to include the existing billboards in their development design. Council Member Henderson noted that most of the billboards along Highway 111 fall within the 50-foot setback area, and asked if the sign company would have to negotiate with the City or the developer. Ms. Honeywell advised that it's up to the developer whether or not they wish to include the billboard in their sign program, which has to be approved by the City. She advised that the purpose of the ordinance was to eventually eliminate billboards, and it was written as legally tight as possible to encourage the signs to disappear over time, and not to allow them to be updated. Council Member Henderson felt that while the City is waiting for development to occur, the sign companies would probably continue maintaining the existing A22$4' r City Council Minutes 15 October 5, 1999 structures, and the City will have to continue living with aging, unattractive signs. Council Member Sniff felt that the request to update, relocate, remodel, and/or replace the existing billboards is reasonable, .and that it would provide more attractive and modern structures. He suggested looking into the possibility of modifying the ordinance and asking Morris Communications to present the Council with some computer -generated "before and after" photographs. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Scheurmier advised that all but four of the billboards in the City are theirs. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Herman advised that there are 10-12 billboards total Wells Marvin, 79-258 Cetrino Street, felt the billboards are a blight to the City, and believed they will eventually fall down if they're not allowed to be moved. He urged the Council to work toward getting all of the billboards removed, to tighten up the current ordinance, and to improve code enforcement of the current sign regulations. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, agreed, and felt that the size of, the signs should be restricted to no larger than what currently exists. Ed Scherer, 68-300 Perez Road, Cathedral City, of Fairway Outdoor Advertising, advised that their signs are 240 sq. ft. (10Y2' X 22Y2'). In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that currently they can maintain the signs forever just as they are by replacing one post or piece of wood at a time. Council Member Perkins wished to see what type of changes they propose for their signs before he will consider changing the ordinance. He felt with proper landscaping and design, it might be possible for them to come up with something that is more attractive. Mr. Scheurmier advised that their plan is to work with staff to create a series of standards that staff feels would be acceptable to present to Council as a logical step forward. Council concurred on directing staff to work with Morris Communications to find out what they can do to make the signs more attractive and less of a visual nn City Council Minutes 16 October 5, 1999 blight, and to look at what would be required in a modified ordinance, as well as the legalities involved. 1.\ DISCUSSION REGARDING NEW DEVELOPMENT PAD ELEVATIONS. Mr. Speer, Senior Engineer, advised that the three-foot pad elevation ifferential, which has been used since early 1990's, was first used as a mpromise solution at the Sonrisa development before the tract was acquired by the current developer. The three-foot pad elevation differential, when cou ed with the single -story requirement, benefits the builder by providing flexibi 'ty to create sufficient slope gradient for sewer and storm water drainage. It bene 'ts the existing resident by imposing a height restriction that avoids a dominati Dresence by the new structure with resaect to the existina structure. a Municipal Code allows a one-story d Iling is within 50 feet minimum back rd setback is 20 feet foi He then reviewe some sight -line slope heights with differe t roof designs and the cost comparisons r the alternatives setback to 15 feet tend to be more cost whereas the costs for re cing the pad is approximately $9,050/ t, and relc approximately $2,700/lot. ne of the elevations is sewer service. VWD i whenever possible because sewe lift ste increase risk of failure, which als incrf publicity. Another relevant conside tic gets farther away from the mountain p - the horizon and the sight -line slope in m 2-foot high structure when an existing f a common property line, and the new lots and 10 feet for existing lots. comparisons for buildings of varying ackyard setbacks. He then reviewed advising that increasing the backyard effective at approximately $2,400/lot, levations by exporting the,soil offsite sating the soil elsewhere onsite is )roblems related to reducing the pad .quires gravity flow sewer systems :ions increase maintenance costs and 3ses exposure to claims and adverse i is the fact that as developable land cs, the mountain ridge line is closer to my cases is less than 12%. Council Member Adolph noted that in some c ses the three-foot pad elevation differential would allow seven to eight feet o fill on the adjacent property, which is against the natural flow of the ground. felt the natural slope should be followed within reason, and didn't wish to see what happened at Sonrisa happen again. He agreed that no one has the rig to a view, but felt the problem is when developers go overboard with fill to r 'se their property. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Speer b4vised that in the Sonrisa development the pads adjacent to the tract boundary ere raised three feet, but nearly 90,000 yards of soil was exported offsite. The tract could have been designed differently, but the City didn't require it. 280 ul4 ATTACHMENT 2 (FA 1 R WAY ADivision of Morris Communications Corporation December 11, 1999 Mr. Jerry Herman Community Development Director. City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Council Study Session Regarding Billboards Dear Mr. Herman: Via Facsimile: (760) 777-7101 and U.S. Mail This letter is written in follow up to the presentation made by Peter Scheurmier of Morris Communications to the La Quinta City Council earlier this Fall. As you will recall, the Council was receptive to our proposal, in concept, to cap the existing number of billboards within the City, allow Morris to upgrade and improve its existing inventory, and allow for relocation of its structures if necessary to accommodate new development within the City. A copy of Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the council is enclosed for your review. result: At this point, we would like to formally propose the following suggestions to accomplish this The number of outdoor advertising structures within the City of La Quinta as of January 1, 1999 be inventoried (Sign Inventory) and capped such that no greater number of such structures may ever exist within the City; 2. The structures within the Sign Inventory maybe modified and maintained in a such a manner so as to improve their general aesthetics, structural soundness and overall appearance consistent with Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the Council; 3. Structures within the Sign inventory which are required to be removed for whatever reason may be relocated within the nonresidential overlay of the regional commercial and community commercial zones only. 4. All structures shall spaced at a minimum of 500 feet from any other structure on the same side of the street, consistent with California law. 290 FAIRWAY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING • PALM SPRINGS • 68.300 PEREZ ROAD • CATHEDRAL CITY • CALIFORNIA • 92234 , r TELEPHONE 760.324.1828 FACSIMILE 760.324.9270 5. The overall height shall not exceed 35 feet above road grade or base of sign whichever is greater. 6. Setbacks for the structures would be as follows: a. Front = 20 feet from street right of way b. Side =10 feet from property line 7. The overall dimension in gross square footage ofthe sign shall not exceed 378 square feet, excluding extended advertising, with the copy. The extended advertising copy ("cut-outs") shall not to exceed 25 percent of gross square footage. With these changes, we believe the objectives set forth in Mr Scheurmier's presentation to council can be accomplished thus striking a balanced approach in encouraging economic development while maintaining, and improving the City aesthetic standards. We welcome your comments. Sincerely, Edward M. Scherer, III General Manager cc: Peter Scheurmier EMS:slt i01R 291 Presentation to La Quinta City Council Mr. Mayor, Honorable Council Members and Participants: My name is Peter Scheurmier. I am Vice President of Outdoor Advertising, Radio and Direct Marketing of Morris Communications Corporation, a family -owned, multimedia company based in Augusta, Georgia. As a family owned and managed company, we operate under clear mandates. Be an integral part of the communities we serve. 2. Do right by the communities and their businesses. 3. Run an honest and aggressive business operation. Specifically, here in La Quinta and the Desert, Morris does business as Fairway Outdoor, Desert Outdoor, Sunrise Bus Shelters, the seven station Desert Radio Group, SmarTTargeT Direct Marketing, and a soon to be launched internet operation. In the City of La Quinta we have seven or eight billboards, a dozen or so bus shelters, and wide distribution of Best Read Guide. Radio, of course, is everywhere. I'd like to take a moment to introduce you to the folks responsible for fulfilling the Morris mandate here in the desert — Ed Scherer, General Manager of Fairway and Desert Outdoor, as well as the Sunrise Bus Shelters. Bruce Johnson is responsible for the Desert Radio Group, Best Read Guide and SmarTTargeT Marketing. Pat Gleeson is Director of Sales for all Morris media operations. Tom Gardner is Sales Manager of the outdoor advertising company and, by the way, an accomplished fine artist in his own right and one of the La Quinta Arts Festival judges. Lastly, but far from least, Lou Penrose, morning host of 1010 K-News and Morris' Director of Community Affairs. I'm not sure I invited him, I think he's here of his own accord as a newsperson to keep us all honest. We are currently consolidating all our media platforms into a single location and combining their operations for maximum reach of valley residents and visitors alike. Morris has been a part of the economic fabric of La Quinta for a quarter of a century and the years have brought significant economic value to the City of La Quinta. Over 25 "La Quinta'businesses use our media platforms to reach people and direct them to La Quinta. In fact, our outdoor advertising company's two largest clients are PGA West/La Quinta Resort and Rancho La Quinta. 292 617 In addition to the commercial side, we try to be good corporate citizens. We have supported many La Quinta events over the years. In fact, today we launched a brand new multimedia campaign on behalf of one of your City's crown jewels. Two billboards at a couple of our most trafficked locations with extensive "on air" support from all radio stations. This is the first non-commercial multimedia project that our consolidated companies have undertaken. In the future, all our resources will be considered in support of community events and causes throughout the Valley. We can do so much more than just a sign here or there, or a few radio spots. Realistically, our combined media platforms can reach everybody in the Valley. The City of La Quinta is rapidly growing both residentially and commercially. We want to stand in support of both you and your business constituents. Our tremendous strength as the Valley's leading out -of -home medium is that we — radio and outdoor and bus shelters — are the last media opportunities to influence a decision. We travel in cars, see signs, hear messages the last thing before we act on where to shop, what to eat, where to play golf and what homesite to visit. I am not here just to blow the Morris horn. We are business people and we want to be doing business with you for many years into the future with our billboard company and bus shelter advertising. By City ordinance, we cannot put up more billboards, which is not an unusual reaction. I am not here to try to proliferate billboards in the City of La Quinta. Our structures in your City are aging, we can repair them for ever, but your current ordinance is so tight, so black and white, that we cannot touch our signs to improve them, so to some degree we both have to live with billboard structures we don't necessarily like. Modern technology, design breakthroughs, and landscaping opportunities can mitigate the visual impact of signs. We are not asking for more signs or more bus shelters — we want to keep what we've got, but be able to remodel to today's standards and relocate to support and further the City of La Quinta's development plans. I am here to seek your support in a business decision and to ask for direction from Council for my company to work with La Quinta city staff to try to develop a plan for an acceptable balance of benefits and burdens associated with outdoor advertising, that properly serves the City's interests and supports your dynamically growing business community, and to possibly propose changes to your current ordinances to accommodate preserving a good business balance. May I respond to any questions? 148 r- 293 ® 2 6 ft. e apex. 338 sq. ft. r t { ` •f �;: :;Ff;� Y S � f l .. '-. .f ..:r.:...:r.. :{..: ....W.:.,.; 4r.. }T:Tr'� :::::?.}':. r:.:: FF.:.r.ri. :,'•,':h:n'S$? 'T'H}"}4F {$.::'Fi.�${: TT :?Ti�•T:r: 'TT:::iTTTi; TT:' : ::: };?:.:�'1.:::: T:..� i}f??:{r�:iiTly +S;}�..: ..-l: {T:jS;kF? Y Ff$i.\.T iF ♦.j :C :':?}. •�� >}� �'t kF �':�? :$1TT. v'.:.. .,(iq!;;:f..�C?S?:i}h"..y '!i+Fjti`:4,+;}.':i 22 ft. --22.5 ft. appx. 2 36.25 sq. ft. X. >ri:•:+�i::�:r� f 'alk>`r:''S�:'<> .�:" ;S�l.�::::�:•l.: �l�.F�nf f� f::'i :F ::;:F'i$ .::.l :%»F: F:>:; 5�lr. r'Y �'S :F.. �': �%2•. F�:�ir nfi:�fr f`/,.F. .�..,F :I.:.F�F.�:�..�S:� : :C�%?F!1:.��:�i"�:' �� f::jg��l�% .�,�'��';�>iJ>,F��': ,,!'; `�Fi�: is Ff;,':':.'•..:;; ;�.: f��hFF f Ali lF lfs.,uf f: . , FfrrFf � I �fFj ///fr � �Fj h � 'n � � ` •� Y l�'� `r��"%i ` S+��—+kC---� ...nrers�-w�M,"er�v� 2 7 f t -7-777- app Lo. ........ L6 ft. LQ ON 23.5 ft. x 23 ft. 20 f $. AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Pagel of 3 ATTACHMENT 4 BILL NUMBER: AB 483 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY 4, 2000 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Wildman FEBRUARY 18, 1999 An act to sepeal Ses-' GA17 amend Section 5412.1 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to outdoor advertising. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 483, as amended, Wildman. Outdoor advertising displays removal compensation: exemptions . The Outdoor Advertising Act prohibits the removal of any lawfully erected advertising display without payment of compensation, as specified. The act exempts from the specified prohibition displays located within residential areas, incorporated agricultural areas, and unincorporated agricultural areas, if the displays meet certain requirements. This bill, additionally, would exempt from the specified prohibition advertising displays located within areas that have been designated redevelopment project areas, parking and business improvement areas, or property and business improvement districts, or areas that have been included in the California Main Street Program, as specified. The bill would also exempt areas that are contiguous to an official state scenic highway, as defined, and areas that are immediately adjacent to a residential area. des-. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State -mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: vse::vN 1. e664!i6i3 541a 94 4h6 $1e16!4i866 ai3d SECTION 1. Section 5412.1 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read: 5412.1. (a) A city, county, -e-r- city and county, or other public agency, whose ordinances or regulations are otherwise in full compliance with Section 5412, is not in violation of that section if the entity elects to require the removal without compensation of any display W% that meets all the following requirements: -- ) 305 (1) The display meets one of the following conditions+Q n as of the date an ordinance or regulation that incorporates the t► http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bilVasm/ab-045 ... /ab483 bill 20000104_amended asm.htm 01/10/2000 AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 2 of 3 provisions of this section either is enacted or becomes applicable to the area and on the date on which a removal requirement is adopted or becomes applicable to the area: (A) The display is located within , or is immediately adjacent to, an area shown as residential on a local general plan ---(a)- (B) (i) The display is located within one of the following: (I) An area that has been designated a redevelopment project under the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code). (II) An area that has been established as a parking and business improvement area under Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code. (III) An area that has been established as a property and business improvement district under Part 7 (commencing with Section 36600) of Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code. (IV) An area that has been included in the California Main Street Program under Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 15399) of Part 6.7 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. (ii) The city, county, city and county, or other public agency has established findings, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record, that removal of the display is necessary to accomplish any of the following: (I) Expansion, renovation, or repair of existing roads, sidewalks, and other infrastructure. (II) Removal of deteriorated buildings from urban lots to make the properties more attractive to private business. (III) Removal or remediation of environmental contaminants from Superfund sites, Brownfield sites, or other contaminated sites. (IV) Installation of transit stops and rail rights -of -way in deteriorated urban areas, older central business districts, and existing neighborhoods. (V) Completion of residential infill construction projects to meet the housing need of low and moderate income households and seniors, and to meet other housing needs. (VI) Upgrading or expansion of existing commercial businesses and public schools. (VII) Removal of visual blights that interfere with the renovation and redevelopment of deteriorated urban areas, older central business districts, and existing neighborhoods. (C) The display is located within an area that is contiguous to a highway that has been designated an official state scenic highway under Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 260) of Chapter 2 of Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code. (2) The display is not located within 660 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of an interstate or primary highway with its copy visible from the highway, nor is placed or maintained beyond 660 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of an interstate or primary highway with the purpose of its message being read from the main traveled way. (a) (3) The display is not required to be removed because of an 3 0 C overlay zone, combining zone, or any other special zoning district whose primary purpose is the removal or control of signs. t13 1 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bdl/asm/ab-045 ... /ab483 bill 20000104_amended asm.htm 01/10/2000 AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 3 of 3 (4) The display is allowed to remain in existence for the period of time set forth below after the enactment or amendment , after January 1, 1983, or for displays affected by the amendments made to this section during the 1999-2000 Regular Session, January 1, 2001, of any ordinance or regulation necessary to bring the entity requiring removal into compliance with Section 5412, and after giving notice of the removal requirement: Fair Market Value on Date of Notice Minimum Years of Removal Requirement Allowed Under $1,999................................. 2 $2,000 to $3,999................................. 3 $4,000 to $5,999................................. 4 $6,000 to $7,999................................. 5 $8,000 to $9,999................................. 6 $10,000 and over .................................. 7 (b) The amounts provided in this section shall be adjusted each January 1 a€teL2 1 r— in accordance with the changes in building costs, as indicated in the United States Department of Commerce Composite Cost Index for Construction Costs. 307 i!32 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/biU/asm/ab_045.../ab-483—bill-20000104—amended—asm.htm 01/10/2000 cj!?i '1�t44Q g;llla P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 April 22, 1999 Assembly Governmental Organization Committee Assembly Member Wesson, Chair Assembly Member Battin, Vice -Chair Assembly Member Ackerman, Member Assembly Member Baugh, Member Assembly Member Cardenas, Member Assembly Member Cardoza, Member Assembly Member Granlund, Member Assembly Member Hetzberg, Member Assembly Member Longville, Member Assembly Member Machado, Member Assembly Member Maldonado, Member Assembly Member Margett, Member Assembly Member Shelley, Member Assembly Member Soto, Member Assembly Member Vincent, Member Assembly Member Wiggins, Member Assembly Member Wright, Member State Capitol Building Sacramento, CA 95814 (760) 777-7000 (TDD) (760) 777-1227 Re: Letter of Support for AB 483 (Wildman) to delete the requirement for cities to pay billboard companies for amortized billboards Dear Assembly Governmental Organization Committee, The City of La Quinta strongly supports the above referenced legislation to delete the requirement for cities to pay billboard companies for the complete value of billboards which are removed. There is perhaps no greater blight to a community than billboards, especially ones that are not wanted by the property owner or city. In many cases, economic development and revitalization efforts are held hostage by not being able to have billboards removed. In La Quinta, billboard companies have demanded millions of dollars per billboard for those billboards which conflict with plans of the private property owner even though these signs were in place on a month -to -month lease. This legislation will help cities in their fight April 22, 1999 Assembly Governmental Organization Committee Page 2 against blight and will bring California in line with the rest of the nation in complying with the Supreme Court decisions upholding the validity of local amortization programs. Billboard companies already have protection under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. Please support AB 483 and allow cities to regulate billboards and other signage. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 01 Thomas P. Genovese City Manager C. Mayor City Council Assembly Member Jim Baffin League of California Cities C.'WV13041WPDO=tE7TERS PO18LLBOARDSO4.1449.wpd 3. AB 1216 (Floyd); AB 1159 (Granlund). Smoking in Bars and Gaming Clubs. League Position: Under review; Opposition anticipated Bill Status: Pending Assignment to Committee Action: Review and send letters. What the Bills Do: Both AB 1216 and AB 1159 would permit smoking in bars, gaming clubs and taverns if certain conditions are met. AB 1216 does not preempt local authority to regulate smoking in these areas, including a total prohibition. AB 1159 appears to preempt such authority. However, the author's office has informed the League that it is not their intent to preempt local authority and that they will amend the bill to remedy the situation. The League has provided the author's office with language to do just that. Background: Existing law in California, Labor Code Section 6404.5, prohibits smoking in most enclosed places of employment. The smoking prohibition was phased in over time and on January 1, 1998, smoking was prohibited in bars, taverns and gaming club areas. Last year, several legislative attempts to repeal the smoking ban in bars failed. AB 1216 and AB 1159 are the latest legislative efforts to permit smoking ban in bars, taverns and gaming clubs. The League is reviewing the specific language of each bill to determine its effect. We anticipate that the League will oppose both bills, consistent with past League positions on similar bills. Interested cities should review AB 1216 and AB 1159 and send their letters to the authors and the League. Once the bills have been assigned to committees, we will notify cities in the Bulletin. Copies of AB 1216 and AB 1159 are available on CityLink or by contacting the State Capitol Bill Room at 916/445-2323. [League Staff: Yvonne Hunter] 4. AB 483 (Wildman). Outdoor Advertising: Removal. League Position: Support Bill Status: Assembly Governmental Organization Committee; No Date Set Action: Send Support Letters to Members of above Committee and the Assembly Judiciary Committee What the Bill Does: Deletes the requirement in state law which requires local governments to fully compensate billboard companies for complete value of billboards which are removed, even if they have been amortized. Reasons for the League's Position: The League supports the ability of cities to regulate billboards and other signage. Background: California law contains some of the most comprehensive protections in the nation against local government billboard removal programs. Billboard removal is a takings issue involving the question of whether or not local regulation requiring the removal of a billboard #11 5 3/19/99 310 constitutes a "taking" of the billboard owner's property, requiring compensation under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. A series of court decisions across the nation have upheld the validity of local amortization programs, which require removal of billboards after four, five and seven-year periods, without requiring compensation. In California, * local government billboard removal efforts are preempted by state law which requires full compensation even if there are amortization programs. This bill will obviously be hotly -contested, and may be amended in various ways. Cities with concerns regarding billboards; should support this effort to return local authority to enact amortization programs. Letters should contain specific local examples of billboard problems, as. well as the levels of compensation demanded by billboard companies for their removal. Known Support: The League. Known Opposition: No letters yet, but billboard companies are sure to oppose. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) [League Staff. Daniel Carrigg] 5. SB 177 (Peace). Public Utilities. Eminent Domain. League Position: Support Bill Status: Pending Hearing Date Action: Please Have Your City Review this Bill What the Bill Does: SB 177 would amend the Public Utilities Act to prohibit a public utility that offers competitive services from condemning any property for the purpose of competing with other entities in the offering of those competitive services. Reason for League's Position: The authority of public utilities, telecommunications companies in particular, under the law is much too broad and can be used to threaten the public property and services of public agencies. This bill reduces the emninent domain authority of telecommunciations companies. Background: The Public Utilities Act authorizes certain public utilities to condemn property. Known Support: City of San Francisco and Building Owners and Managers Association of California. Known Opposition: None. [League Staff: Natasha Fooman] #11 6 3/19/99 311 r REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 14 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Meeting December 8, 1999 I CALL TO ORDER Regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairperson Osborne, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Bulgrin, Irwin, Lewis, Olander and Vice - Chair Mahfoud ABSENT: Board Member Moulin and Chairman Osborne OTHERS PRESENT: John Falconer, Finance Director and Debbie DeRenard, Secretary II PUBLIC COMMENT - None III CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed IV CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of Meeting on November 10, 1999 for the Investment Advisory Board. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Lewis/Moulin to approve the Minutes of November 10, 1999. Motion carried unanimously. V BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for October 1999 Mr. Falconer advised that a revised Treasurers Report has been given to the Board. He further advised the correction was in the formulas, the numbers changed very little. He further reviewed the report and explained the activities for the month. 312 Investment Advisory Board Minutes December 8, 1999 In response to Board Member Olander, Mr. Falconer advised that the Investment Policy does not permit investments for more than two years. He further advised that when the Investment Policy is reviewed each year, Board Members can make suggested changes to the policy. Board Member Lewis advised that the interest rates do not fluctuate that much over two -years and investing for more than two years allows you to take the risk of the market underperforming. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Irwin/Lewis to review, receive and file the Treasurers Report for October 1999. Motion carried unanimously. VI CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. Month End Cash Report - November 1999 Noted and Filed. B. Pooled Money Investment Board Reports - September 1999 In response to Vice Chairman Mahfoud, Mr. Falconer advised that if a Board Member has a specific question, he will contact the State Treasurer's Office or he can give the Board Member the contact name and telephone number. The Board discussed the number of investments that LAIF has in small banks - questioning why they have moved in this direction. Discussion continued with Mr. Falconer suggesting that he supply the Board with a historical spreadsheet detailing investments in small institutions. In response to Mr. Falconer, the Board clarified what banks are considered a small financial institution and those considered large. Discussion ensued with the Board not reaching a consensus on what would be considered a small financial institution. 2 31 002 Investment Advisory Board Minutes December 8, 1999 After further discussion, Vice Chairman Mahfoud suggested that Mr. Falconer contact LAIF for their investment criteria regarding financial institutions. C. LAW Answer Book update for September 30, 1999 Noted and Filed VIII BOARD MEMBER ITEMS - None IX ADJOURNMENT MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Bulgrin/Lewis to adjourn the meeting at 6:15' p.m.. Motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, Debbie DeRenard Secretary 3 314 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /6' COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 1999 I. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room. Chairperson St. Johns presided over the meeting. Commissioner Bechard led the Pledge of Allegiance. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Deborah Bechard Commissioner Mike Davis Commissioner Kathryn Pedersen -Nadler Commissioner Joan Rebich (Vice Chairperson) Commissioner Victoria St. Johns (Chairperson) VACANCY: One MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Michelle Henson STAFF PRESENT: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director Cristal Spidell, Secretary John Freeland, Senior Engineer It was moved by Commissioner Rebich/Nadler to excuse Commissioner Henson from the meeting. Unanimous. II. PUBLIC COMMENT - None III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes for November 8, 1999 Commissioner Pedersen -Nadler clarified her statement about the Sports Complex and the items she brought to staffs attention that needed taken care of. B. Monthly Department Report for November 1999 - Received and filed. It was moved by Commissioner Rebich/Davis to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. Unanimous. V. PUBLIC HEARING -None G:\MyData\CRISTAL\CSC\CSCMIN.12-13.wpd 315 VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Civic Center Campus Staff introduced John Freeland, Public Works Senior Engineer to the Commission. Mr. Freeland updated the Commission on the progress that has been made to the Civic Center Campus project. The Commission viewed a video of water features from Waterworks for ideas for the campus. Tom Doczi, landscape architect for the project, said he has worked with items of this nature (water features) in the past so he is familiar with them. Mr. Freeland said he hopes to send the project out for bids in March, and start construction in May 2000. Phase One should take approximately one year to complete. Mr. Freeland said the City Council has approved a lake with an island and two bridges, a historical plaza, a rose garden, a children's garden, a children's fountain area, and a desert garden area. Mr. Freeland said a gazebo could be put on the island which could accommodate over 200 people. A geyser will be in the middle of the lake to circulate the water and act as a focal point to draw people to the park. A library is also planned for the Civic Center Campus but that is 5 years away. Mr. Doczi suggested a permanent shade structure with picnic table for larger gatherings, as well as a tot lot area for children 2-6 years of age. The Commission discussed the project and supported the tot lot area, water features, and the project as a whole. Council Member Sniff spoke to the Commission about the history of the campus and said that it originally was going to be an amphitheater. Council Member Sniff said that art pieces would be placed throughout the park. Commissioner Rebich/St. Johns made a motion to support the campus project. Motion failed 2-3 (Commissioners Davis/Pedersen-Nadler/Bechard voted no). Commissioner Pedersen-Nadler's concern was that the new park will cost more then what was spent on the pool at Fritz Burns Park. After further discussion and clarification it was moved by Commissioner Rebich/Pedersen-Nadler to support the project including the water features and children's area. Unanimous. B. Census 2000 Committee Work Plan Ms. Horvitz said Census 2000 Forms will be mailed out on April 1, 2000. The City Council has approved a Resolution supporting the formation of a Complete Count Committee on November 16. CVAG has hired a Census 2000 Coordinator, which the City contributed $5,000, to coordinate all the cities in the Valley. The first Complete Count Committee meeting is December 16 at CVAG in Palm Desert and the Commission needs to appoint a representative. It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen-Nadler/Davis to appoint Commissioner Bechard to attend and represent the Commission at the meeting. Unanimous. 316 G:\MyData\CRISTAL\CSC\CSCMIN.12-13.wpd 00. C. North Park Master Plan John Freeland, Public Works Senior Engineer reviewed the report and asked the Commission for recommendations to the North Park Master Plan for City Council consideration on January 4. Mr. Freeland suggested the Commission could do a needs assessment since the last one was done in 1992 and the current Master Plan is the result of that assessment. Council Member Sniff agreed that another needs assessment should be done and suggested the Commission make multiple recommendations for the North Park for the City Council to consider on January 4. The Commission discussed what they would like in the park. The Commission would like a skate park, lights, a picnic area, a community center, a dog park, open space for soccer fields, a par course around the park, basketball courts, volleyball courts, and restrooms. The Commission would like to delete the pond and streams that are on the current Master Plan, as well as the tennis courts. The Commission would also like to reconfigure the amphitheater so the space is useable. Staff indicated the park would be done in phases, with the first phase being turf and the following phases would include the amenities. Currently, Granite Construction is removing dirt from the property but no grading is being done by the City at this time. Council Member Sniff thinks the park needs to be less aesthetics and more function. Ms. Horvitz said the land behind La Quinta Middle School is being used for soccer practice, and more lighting may be considered at a later time for the Sports Complex. Commissioner Pedersen -Nadler suggested reconfiguring the park master plan for maximum use. It was moved by Commissioner Pedersen-Nadler/Rebich to recommend the City Council consider a skate park, a picnic area, a community center, a dog park, open space for soccer fields, a par course around the park, basketball courts, volleyball courts, and restrooms at the North Park site and delete the pond and streams that are on the current Master Plan. Unanimous. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS A. Parks & Recreation Master Plan Ms. Horvitz informed the Commission that an RFP is going out for a new Parks & Recreation Master Plan. Staff asked the Commission to begin reviewing the current Master Plan which will be reviewed at a later date. Commissioner Rebich asked about the 59,000 population figure. Council Member Sniff said it was a 20 year population projection for La Quinta. This will be on the agenda for discussion next month. B. Invitation to KSL Luncheon on December 17, 1999 - Received and filed. 317 G:\MyData\CRISTAL\CSC\CSCMIN.12-13.wpd U 0 3 VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS Commissioner Rebich asked staff about the Quimby Act. Staff said it was a fund that developers contribute to if their projects consist of 5 or more homes. The developer has a choice to pay a fee and/or dedicate land within the development for subdivisions over 50 houses. The dedicated land is developed into a public park area. If funds are paid, it goes into development of other park sites. Staff will have more information on the Quimby Act at the next meeting. Commissioner Davis would like a list of all the dedicated park sites in La Quinta. Council Member Sniff told the Commission that Miles and Washington Street is a potential park site. Commissioner Pedersen -Nadler received a copy of an article from the Desert Sun that told about Interact's Operation Santa project. Chairperson St. Johns brought in biodegradable doggie bags for the Commission to see. IX. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Rebich/Pedersen-Nadler to adjourn the meeting. Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. NEXT MEETING DATE, TIME AND TOPIC January 10, 2000 7:00 PM La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room • Parks & Recreation Master Plan • Quimby Act • Dedicated Park sites in subdivisions Submitted by: Cristal Spidell, Co mission Secretary 318 G:\MyData\CRISTAL\CSC\CSCMIN.12-13.wpd U 6 4 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /7 MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall Session Room 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 17, 1999 This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order by Chairman Robert Wright at 3:00 p.m. who led the flag salute and asked for the roll call. I. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call. Present: Commissioners Barbara Irwin, Mike Mitchell, Maria Puente, and Chairman Robert Wright. Staff Present: Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Chairman Wright asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of October 21, 1999. Commissioner Irwin asked that reference to "The Tradition" be changed to "Tradition" under Commissioner Items Item #C There being no further corrections, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Irwin to approve the Minutes of October 21, 1999, as corrected. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS A. Interim Archaeological Testing and Mitigation Report for Tentative Tract 28964: located on the north side of 50 Avenue and Jefferson Street. Applicant: Affiliated Construction. Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 319 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -1- �1 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 17, 1999 2. Commissioner Mitchell asked how the burial cremation remains would be handled: Mr. Bruce Love stated they would contact the Indian Tribes to see what they wanted. They had been in contact with Mark Benitiz regarding the remains, but at this point they are not sure the Coroner's Office had any of the remains. It needs to be clarified and once it is they will make arrangements to have them interned and prepare a final report for the Commission. 3. Commissioner Irwin asked if this was the same property as reviewed before and if the boundaries were the same. The previous concerns were the "human- like" remains and whether they had been sent to Riverside for analysis. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated it was a requirement that they be sent to a Zooarchaeologist. Mr. Love stated that at this point they have not been sent to UCLA for analysis, but they have done an extensive survey. Mr. Oliphant stated the previous archaeologist on the project had stated the remains were so fine they were assumed to be human. Commissioner Irwin stated they were reported as being "human -like" and the Commission was very concerned about the disposition of the bones. She was pleased with the report and her only concern is the disposition of the remains. 4. Commissioner Puente stated the area where the remains were found was very large and should be taken seriously. The City needs to know what has happened with the bones that were collected. Mr. Love stated that everything collected by L&L Archaeology had been turned over to them and they had cataloged all the material. The bones will be sent to UCLA and analyzed. Staff stated the analysis would be a part of the final report as the project is conditioned to do so before the first building permit can be issued. 5. Chairman Wright stated this appears to be a very rich artifact area and he is confident with Mr. Love's work. He asked if Mr. Love believed any area should have additional studies. Mr. Love stated that all the areas had been surveyed and material collected, but more artifacts will be found during the grading. 6. Commissioner Puente asked what the Native American's preference has been. Mr. Love stated they traditionally wanted the artifacts collected and analyzed and any remains turned over to them for reburial. 7. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Irwin to adopt Minute Motion 99-027 accepting the Interim Archaeological Testing and Mitigation Report for Tentative Tract 28964, subject to conditions. Unanimously approved. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -2- 3o'a A Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 17, 1999 B. Archaeological Testing and Site Evaluation Report for Tentative Tract 29436; located on the north side of Eisenhower Drive, east of Coachella Drive. Applicant: US Home Corporation. Archaeological Consultant: CRM TECH. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa stated staff was recommending this report be continued to the next meeting. 2. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to continue this to the next meeting. Unanimously approved. C. Recommend to the City Council Participation with the Historical Society in the Design and Cost of a Plaque Recognizing Tradition/Hacienda del Gato as a Historic Resource located at the south terminus of Washington Street and 52°d Avenue. Applicant: La Quinta Historical Society. 1. Commissioner Irwin withdrew due to a possible conflict of interest. 2. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Puente/Mitchell to adopt Minute Motion 99-028 recommending to the City Council financial and other participation in the Tradition plaque, with the dollar amount not to exceed $500.00. Unanimously approved. Commissioner Irwin rejoined the Commission. D. Phase I Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Palm Oasis Trailhead Project: located at the south end of the La Quinta. Cove area. Applicant: City of La Quinta. Archaeological 'Consultant: Archaeological Advisory Group (James Brock) 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Commissioner Mitchell stated, based on the report, this project would not have any impact on cultural resources. 3. Commissioner Irwin agreed and stated the area had been subjected to so many floods over the years that the likelihood of anything being found was unlikely. 321 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -3- U 1 8 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 17, 1999 4. Chairman Wright stated this was a good project and he supported it. He agreed that a lot of excavation work has been done in this area and the probability of anything being found was minimal. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Mitchell/Puente to adopt Minute Motion 99-029 accepting the Phase I Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Palm Oasis Trailhead project. E. Review and Comment on the possible acquisition. use, location and expansion of the Historical Society Museum; located at the southeast corner of Avenida Montezuma and Avenida Mendoza. Applicant: City of La Quinta. L ' Commissioner Irwin withdrew due to a possible conflict of interest. 2. Assistant City Manager Mark Weiss presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 3. Mr. Joe Irwin, representing the La Quinta Historical Society, stated the Society has planned a public meeting on December Td to seek input. As of now the Society has no position regarding the issues mentioned as they had not had time to formulate any ideas. There current vision has been to pay off the mortgage, but have come to realize the City has both the financial and human resources to bring more things to pass than they would be able to. After the public meeting the Board will meet and make a decision. 4. Commissioner Mitchell stated one of the biggest issues has been what to do with the artifacts collected from of the surveys being required. Is the Society going to be a curation facility? Mr. Irwin stated it is part of their vision. Should the plans with the City go forth, they would want to transfer title of the Museum to the City and lease it back from the City. Commissioner Mitchell asked if they would want to work with College of the Desert or the new four year college. Mr. Irwin stated they had given no thought to the matter. Commissioner Mitchell stated he was looking for partners to help out financially. 5. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio asked the Commission to review the staff report and go over each issue. a. Publically owned facility - Commissioner Mitchell stated the Museum should be governed by a government facility as there are State and Federal guidelines to follow in regard to curation. He CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -4- 324 ul� Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 17, 1999 would want to get away from private individuals having any control over the artifacts. Mr. Irwin stated the Board had been talking with the City about an operating agreement to set out guidelines. Commissioner Mitchell suggested a Memorandum of Understanding. Commissioner Puente stated she agrees with Commissioner Mitchell as it is a good idea. Chairman Wright stated the Historical Society has been a great asset to the City. Every fund raiser they have had has been to pay the mortgage and in his opinion it would be better to have a lease back agreement with the City so the Society could concentrate on more important things. b. Moving the Building - Commissioner Puente stated it would require a different and larger building and she would not agree to moving the existing building. Mr. Irwin stated that he recognizes that if the building was moved it would put it at risk. Chairman Wright stated that as to moving the building he would be against it. He suggested that if the Museum were left in its current location the City should consider closing the street. Mr. Irwin stated they are not in favor of moving the building, but if they were to expand the current building, parking becomes a big issue. If the street were closed off and the City could acquire the property next door, it would be of a help. C. Paleontological and Archaeological Finds - Commissioner Mitchell stated he had no comment or concerns. His only concern is in regard to the curation so that the artifacts could be left in the Valley. 6. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated an analysis had been done regarding the parking that would be needed. The City requirement would be one space per 300 square feet. 7. Mrs. Barbara Irwin stated the building was built in 1934 and does not predate the La Quinta Hotel. It had been the administration building for the housing development for the Cove. The two story building next door was the lumber yard for that project. Commissioner Irwin rejoined the Commission. 323 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -5- li e.. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes November 17, 1999 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Irwin/Puente to adjourn this meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission on December 16, 1999. This meeting of the Historical Preservation Commission was adjourned at 3:44 p.m. November 17, 1999. Unanimously approved. Su itted by: y,J S wyer Execu 've Secretary CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\HPC11-17-99.wpd -6- REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /9 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA December 8, 1999 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:08 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di Iorio. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank Reynolds. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of October 7, 1999. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously a0proved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 99-657; a request of RHL Design Group for USA Petroleum for approval of architectural and landscaping plans for a gasoline facility with mini market and automated tunnel car wash located at the northwest corner fo Highway I I I and Dune Palms Road. 1. Associate Planner Leslie Mouriquand presented the information contained in the staff report and noted revised elevations were submitted prior to the meeting, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he did not see where the palm trees were listed on the plant list. Staff noted they were listed under groundcover. 325 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 1 U 2 2- Architectural & Landscape Review Committee December 8, 1999 ' 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated the additional rear detail was an improvement with the windows and other design details. With regard to the towers he did not believe it was a problem. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated that design wise the entry tower architecturally should predominate. The second tower is decorative and does not define any entry or exit while the last defines the exit to the car wash. Because the building is only 14-feet high and the towers other than the entry tower, will be up to nine feet taller than the building, this will appear to be out of portion and unbalanced. They should be integrated into the whole design and not appear as if they are standing by themselves. Staff agrees with the new design as it integrates the two towers into the existing roof and leaves the entry tower as is which is fine because it is the focal of the design. Committee Member Cunningham started he liked the towers because a lot of the buildings along Highway 111 have the long plane loon and this breaks up that linear look. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he likes the applicant's original design and believes it is an attractive building, but he understands staff s issue. 5. Mr. Jim Shively, Project Manager for USA Petroleum, stated they added detail to -the rear elevation and although the towers are lowered it spreads the design out. Their challenge has been to give as much variation as possible under the City's ordinances. They believe the building should stretch and grow as much as possible. He understands staff s desire for a lower profile, but if you drop the towers down, it looks squatty. The tower adds interest. A compromise would be to retain one tower, the large tower, and lower the other for a lower profile. They are willing to do either suggestion. It is not their intention to violate the height regulations. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt stated the pad elevation at the corner sits up fairly high and asked staff what the final grade would be. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio stated it is six feet higher than the street and this will be an issue before the Planning Commission. Staff is recommending a drop in the pad height. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that with the height of the pad the building towers would be up too high. 7. Committee Member Reynolds stated the access off of Highway I I I is a concern to him. Staff stated it is a right in/right out and has been approved as part of the Specific Plan. 8. Committee Member Cunningham stated he liked the look of the towers, but if the building is to be constructed at the pad's current height, they will be too high. Staff stated a recommendation will made to the Planning Commission to require the pad height to be reduced. The Zoning Code for the Highway I I I Corridor allows 22 feet within 150 feet of the right of way. Committee Member Cunningham stated it has balance if one tower is lowered. He would 326 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 2 U 2.9 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee December 8, 1999 prefer to see all three towers as it would add a little spice to the corner. The detail that has been added to the rear has resolved any issues with that elevation. 9. Committee Member Bobbit stated it depends on the final pad height. If the pad comes down, the towers can stay as proposed by the applicant. If the pad is going to remain at four feet above Highway 111, then the towers should be lowered. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 99-022 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 98-657, subject to conditions as recommended with the deletion of Condition # 1. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 99-661; a request of Canaday & Company for approval of architectural and landscaping plans for three new prototype residential units located on the north side of 48`' Avenue, east of Caleo Bay Drive within Lake La Quinta. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Roger Moore, representing the applicant, stated they had no objection to the conditions as recommended with the except of Condition # 1. The new homes have a ten foot plate compared to the existing off -water plans which have an eight foot plate. In his opinion, it will look out of proportion with the existing. He believes the clipped gable -end is outdated. With the new roof line they pick up the feeling of the clipped gable roof. They can add a gable - end over the master bedroom at the rear to change the look, and/or a gable to the front to make it different on the front on the Plan 20 and 10. They do however, strongly object to the clipped gable. They are trying to create interior volume. 3. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if staff s recommendation could be accomplished without the clipped gable. 4. Committee Member Cunningham stated the reason to use the clipped gable is that it was less costly. In the one plan there is a hip along the back. On the second plan it takes care of itself. On the third plan the applicant's suggestion for the rear would solve units having the same problem. He then asked the applicant how close they are from the other houses with the clipped roof. Mr. Moore stated they are across the street from some. None of the water units have clipped gable roofs. The Avante units have a mix of both. The only conflict would be the units across the street. There are a total of 56 3 2 7 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 3 U 2 4 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee December 8, 1999 lots left -for development of these plans. The first three lots off Adams Street would be the models. 5. Committee Member Cunningham received clarification that 56 lots would be built with the proposed three plans. 6. Committee Member Bobbitt asked what staff would do with the proposed roof type to achieve the clipped gable roof look. Staff showed examples. 7. Committee Member Cunningham stated he did not see a problem in the development. Some of the units will have clipped gables and some will have the shape developed by the original developer as well as the other developers. He approves of the hipped roofs. He does agree that on the rear roof of the house it should be more articulated. Committee Member Bobbitt stated that without something to look at it is hard to visualize the difference between the two. Discussion followed as to what the units would look like. 9. Committee Member Bobbitt stated it would be a lot of work to change the plans. Staff stated Condition # 1 could be deleted. 10. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 99-023 approving Site Development Permit 99-661, as recommended with the deletion of Condition # 1. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None V. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to the next regular meeting to be held on January 5, 2000. This meeting was adjourned at 10:53 a.m. on December 8, 1999. Respectfully submitted, T SAWY , Executive Secretary City La Ouinta, California C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRC12-8-99.wpd 4 o2 328 TQ. DEPARTMENT REPORT: 1,A 5 Gehl OF pS4 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: January 18, 2000 RE: Department Report — Response(s) to Public Comment The following is the response to public comments made at the January 4, 2000 City Council meeting: 1. Mr. Richard Petri, 78-810 Sunbrook Lane, addressed the City Council regarding landscaping along Miles Avenue, between Adams Street and Washington Street. • Mr. Petri's concerns are addressed in the Public Works Department Report included in this packet. 329 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3 - A JANUARY 18 JANUARY 19-23 JANUARY 27 FEBRUARY 1 FEBRUARY 4 FEBRUARY 7 FEBRUARY 15 FEBRUARY 24 MARCH 3 MARCH 7 MARCH 16-19 MARCH 21 CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING (12:00 PM - TORRES MARTINEZ GROUP) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING (7:00 PM THERMAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL) CITY COUNCIL MEETING CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE CITY COUNCIL MEETING LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 330 MARCH 23 CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD MARCH 31 MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE APRIL 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27 CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD MAY 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 23-25 ICSC CONFERENCE IN LAS VEGAS 331 January 2000 Monthly Planner Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 01 /12/2000 332 February 2000 Monthly Planner 2 3 4 5 2:00 PM City Council Meeting 6 7 8 9 �0 11 12 12:00 PM Coun- 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC 7:00 PM Cultural cil Mtg/Torres- Mosquito Pena Arts Commission Martinez Abate. -Perkins 5:30 PM Invest- :7:00 PM Council 7:00 PM Plan- ment Advisory Mtg/Thermal ning Commis- Board Comm. Council sion Meeting I 13 15 l�6 17 �8 19 10:00 AM CVAG 9:00 AM CVB- 3:30 PM Historic l Public Safety Henderson Preservation Perkins 2:00 PM City Commission 12:00 PM CVAG Council Transp-Perkins Meeting 7:00 PM Commu- nity Services Commission VDDIIRB 5 DDI 20 21 22 123 24 25 26 President's 7:00 PM Plan- 12:00 PM CVAG Day ning Commis- Human/Com- (Holiday) sion Meeting Adolph 4:00 PM DRRA Airp-Henderson 27 28 29 2:30 PM RCTC Budget -Pena January March S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 2 3 4 9 10 11 16 17 18 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 01/12/2000 26 27 28 29 30 31 333 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4—A _ �� lIG1�uGu 5 G�hf OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety -,--/I. DATE: January 18, 2000 RE: Monthly Department Report - December 1999 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of December. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $250,424,059, which represents an issuance of 2,939 building permits through December; • 2,680 animal control cases have been handled through December; • 2,038 code compliance cases have been initiated through December; • 11 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in December. 334 i Con W r .. U N N J N � C4 U CO F V] dx F Ln q N O N n W O O Vi 01 N r 00 �o ram. eV N F U� A F. az FO Q � zF O ^� O 00 00 V 00 O 1n In N 00 O n �D in O r� v .� 0, W) n M M r. z ON C, O m N M O 00 N 00 00 en h cr, M 00 z O 00 [ ^ N G7 eNri e4 r4 N ri O� 00 R O ON O N %. ON W �D aH a H a s W O kn O M kn 0000 N O r 000 000 O C O O � r Gz, W W O p- U a, C; n t- M M •� 00 .� o o o� W tn -■ .: .: .. 00 r FZA F Up .a 00 in en M O O O 00 00 O O O O O O tO tn \O �n W r 0 O �O 0 O — .� t - N �O N N 00 OD � DD N kn In W 00 R 00 .r 1n � O� M N e.e r O Qom,wl Q A a oo �o enn kn .. ao v en00 ao 0 n 0 o -. .. n .. N 00 V r w r to A M e} "i 00 R O O 00 n O O^ N o0 I O I O z F en�' IO eF �O O� D\ n ...i o0 O N 00 M O\ O \O ON O (4 " W) N 00 R N O M N M N en �O N n ON 1n N U N as le 0\Ln N r: N Q�. F G7 F n o N o In �o N M o O o V4 N O In o 0 O 0 M 0 0 o n 1n o 00 z O e+1 M cl 00 Z 00 le �•-� �• N 00 e4 en for i / N M ON N A O O r oo 7 -+ 1n n en.. N O �, 01 — v \0 N ON \.O M r+ N tn o0 ..r N wa z z w N ] a z r .. Nc to N M a M v V w o A a r W z o 0 owo ON N v' F. e4a Q F N O ^, q v, F 0 c a M o� �Z`''a ;ap �z""WN nVo�o.7oa�aa N Gti F W W W 002 335- ANIMAL PICKUPS MONTHLY: Dogs Alive —_54 Dead JCL Oats Alive II — Dead 5 Other Animal Alive 5 Dead 2_ Alive —7.0— Dead 43— TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 113 ►I�`fi► /� 411U►NI:TOaRMOO:4801:in11D[I)5IuI:1DoI' L'II YEAR TO INCIDENTS DATE: HANDLED: 476 Bite reports 116 158 Animal trap set ups 62_ Cruelty to Animals Investigations VIOLATIONS: No owner Contact Dogs at large 10 Noise disturbance 0 Defecation removal 0 License violation 0 Other 0 Monthly Total 10 YEAR TO DATE 214 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: 240_ Warnings 3 0 0 1 -M Vicious Animal Restraining order YEAR TO MONTHLY DATE: Special hour patrols Zoning Violations Lost & found reports Animal Rescue Outside agency assistance City hall reclaims Other TOTALS Citations —LL 0 0 1 0 2044 TOTAL YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: _2 9 3 -M 0 4 _31 398 2_ 33 3 -1-7 1I A02 �2_ 360 75 1.196 336 003 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: DECEMBER,1999 ABATEMENTS: YEAR TO DATE: Nuisance Abatements Started 43 882 Weed Abatements Started 5 213 Vehicle Abatements Started 74 897 Dwelling Abatements Started 1 46 TOTAL STARTED 123 2,038 TOTAL COMPLETED 150 1,825 Home Occupation Inspections 1_ 89 Business Licence Inspections 6 4_ Public Service 345 5,769 Garage sale permits Issued 201 1,485 forms\councilceo 3��4 rnrnrnrnrnrnrncnrnrnrn rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn mrno)rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrno) p.-aoot.- COcoODOMOO IANONO�OOOr�-c` —INNNNNC�NNNNN O a ¢r W Z UW LU Ofz2 � O a W U 17) W C��_' Ow ZLIJ<OLLJUP W _jwz �W)�0 J}zW(n d Q-i U W r U 0 w � Z .°IQOO�w»4¢�'w0 BM(Lo <mmmKwu 0NCO04000� I I-t�CD 00)coMO00 T OCON 0.-0)O V CO CO V0ON CO t(?.-OCMN00 G C vTr-M — — , v N a— t-- toCOI-000Ot�cOCO I-h BOO 0000000000 _IcD CO CO CD � CD cD 0 co cD O r— rl- r .r_co vr-ivr— I �r- CL a O� 04 04 O 04 O 04 O O O I N N N N N N N N N N N prnaNiONi 04 m04 TimCDrn mm m w N I¢a¢¢¢¢¢¢aaa �UUUUUUUUUUU rrrrrrrrrrr zzzzzzzzzzz �vavooaoovav �'gg��gg3gg�g W > 0 � a 0 0 r w = W o v U O N Z Ox QU%Oo S � � �W00 U_ W> _WPP .-¢OJ_v_�¢-cFOcnun -atnU>OWZ0==WW "D000tnrntnotn000 �IU')00r- gGoo�CCO0)a0 tLO Ul) q V1,) 00N. No P_ 0*0 0r0 w W 0 z O Q � z O f OU Q J Q�UZ z W>Z ¢ Z QWz¢ U0 W 2 -- zJm�•O ra 5�YUzO wWOWUrZWU Z 10 WQW Z 0¢U Wwwo:=mmW O ¢mPEF-��WZ�O , w =)Lc3z tthau r W -)m NDjLU0-0=Z— U maa3ozgNo(j)P DOtiO n O—CDON0 C(DU')cO cDtoOCOCOcDO ILOU)LOtOANLOLONLOU)U) 00000000000 338 005 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 6-Pr 4 • " MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 18, 2000 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of December. PAMonthly Department Report.wpd 330 F- z W Q a w 0 z W E 0 W W F— CD CG C O U cr) cc m W W 0 Z O U Q N � N �-0 o 0 U Q. N r— N N Q. U a U Q c E cc CL O > -C p > cn O O O O O z O CL O E co o a a� +, U v � CD d rn LLI o C a E > t U C Cl) N O +r O N O O N N O N N O O N +� O C O O U +}cC_CC_C_C_ +�C� C C C E C C C C C N C c0 ++ 0 }i .O C O N O O 7 O 7 7 7 O 7 7 Q E CD cn cn cn N cn U cn cn cn N N Q N C +r M O I Q CL _ (n (D L O U O 00 00 C � 04 W cn + N cn C O m N C a CL U Cl)U co a d Cl)coO L O ii C> cn Q Lri Q CL o a Q a� Q CD p` Q o N a) m > cn �_ N N a`) U ca a rn C U += O '� Q_ N> p C C Nco d LLG ftL!i 0 J CC G CO O G U LL O U) U (n p m (n 2 N a Q T 340 UU4 a _C c L L co O Q ° p� L w CD O O C C UU y V N N �� C U Ocy) N rLN CL U > 7 O C +, CLo _ O N N N rLCV CL U U > >p O L Q. aQ O O CV a U a) CM 3'' O L a) L cn O - (o L +' N a) +-' � O C O }' co r, O C "O C C OIt Na '` 0 J Q Cn Lo a)}N ° °L- a) ) O= -° Y) COCQM c Oo Qa ° o a O Co a' c a E ' a) cm O a) 0 > c>'��orno o co° oa) ac > c a) E cm c O OO O N cn3�, ai 4- 4°- O co =a °° -p O= L W >� O O U �°co�oa, co • L 'a O O > Co ca75 >> d7 cn c 5 C, C a) co U p U p O�-0— —v a) > N - O of 0 ° c O co N ,4 1\ O L C a CO O N O O U co O i +' ,� E ao 00 M +r *J � _ a) -0 L> J L O +, LO coo "O N r— C coN � O L� CO O N +' t N 0 co E +' D O i -0 N � a) "a CL C U C co a) — p c 0� N O> }' o L O w O• W tm c C cn .� E U � O ,° >� M 0 O C O -0 p E "O vi CL 3 C t- O_ co CC O Q. E C° to "p 4) C °' O O +' N' O C i=+ O co c 0 a)a) o cA t O E � ° U 0 C co a) cA E f° O a +� cn cUo E c " c� > O ° 'C7 cn U co -p N — N N •— -p Q •N n +.,' a) a) L O C O O M a) C _O cn CD "O "p "p C C N E N c C O' CD C N U c zA co o O >� O. O- -C co CL >� C +, Cn ° a co n N 7 +r E ° O O y 0 cca c a) cn O .0) "- O O co > a) `— Co O ns O > 2 O a) ip O O cn > "O +) > O () N a) Cl) 4-- a) +j Co C U +' i Q N N 00 C O Q L _O M a) O C O O a) 'O � co +' cn cUo of E C .N C C 00 O O O Q) cn> .00 a U O t O -p L ++ L +, N p 0' I— O "� 0 0 N E Ct p C aCO co 3 N O N C O L a) ' O� p +J "O O E J +, > O 0 N 0) -p > '+� ++ vi 0 C O 3 Oi - E a) C LO 5' C cn Cl S E C 7 > a) C O' 7 a) a) a) O U p O X cn — E cn O Q co O_ a) -Q a) O a) 0= �`. 0 O U N' � N a) L 0) in cn F- L a) p CA 0= U M 0 +, 0= O (n C� H 00 � Qom C. ~ C� Cr) lf) C L N M +� co Q C O pj = O W E a 0 0 0 O CD M °7S d a)0= ° O cfl C LO +� Oa) c ON aiU � CO ' p C7 dj D_ cr d7 N >, 0-)co N 0 co � a- N- ~ C�. C7 w c U 0 1- 0 U N I- F- 341 u j M > > 0 0 Q a Q Q M� .-N U U a_U > o> CL CL a Q O• Q M CN N U U �U 0 0 N U N .a c O> cn E CO CD F— C 0 a) O E NQ �M U aZ O > 0-o Q a Q C.4 QC a) n o 0 00 Q o > Q o Q a Q 00 j[t Q(L a) -a +.' C C O O Q a) O (n .0 > c cn n 0 +-' '*- a) � o� n3 �, c a) � m >• L� ca CD c0 N a) L7 C N Q - U <a E ai � c _rn cn C t ` O O +J O LE n a) a) > 4+- . •a) co c > 0- OC O M d "O LL O L U � > ccO U= CO C 0 +J .O CD O > C CO c O J O Q — _ _ cn E cn 0 c0 C� C O cm L O }' ) •� ` 41 O c C >• a) CD — O �cc N a- +J O O •� O 'C E •O O 7 O OUP m LJ O. ca m C C a3 O �-0 XE +`+ 2 ` (n c U O .O O +' +- F- a) O co O. ' O CD � L7 O "O "d U .� a) U p 'O +' c -c O a) = a) cn cc0 �C ccv �' O cn 0 Ur C +J O ' ; N cn c rn m ,� N O as +., c rn t n 7 O +.� E U m -a a) E E U 'O +�+ 0 a � C O. O O m n .� a) co � F- N E c E t > °� c > >Q" E c cc m CD > o E N oM0 Q c o C }' O +, L -o 0 0 7 C Z a) O +� a) �� c o C O C N E :� O` O O m C m COj N n O_ C (n cn E a) o +.� cv � +1 .� M C 0 a M 4— m Q U) C C -C O E O C m O M C N M O c0 c0 :2 O C7 O 'O 0 +1 1 O 4- O Q 3 O> +' -p C c_ cca Co (O N -a V a) C C i cv }' Q f° c Q O L D O m CL U, a) > In� O > cop a 0 d v p p Q p 0 E� C o +, fn N C > O N> C +-' cC C OU O —_ O- O N Co " C Q "O I\ M > cc OL O c J Q N CO `�— C O a) O cn CL - C O -O CL CO .� p cn V• O (7 Co E o c6 o cn c0 L L O L O c Q ` O m 0 00 L ` 0 0 -0 ` L O .0 c 0 ,� o O C c O m LO O a) C o ++ cd cn a) 4••• o o L { + W- cn 0 � cn 00 O +.., U cn +., O a) m cn +J > i J C a) cn +, O_ cn > a , cn E + 'a.., c +J cn m a) > cn O .0 0 0 00 O O c 0 L- O O O J O "O cn Q) <On O � a) �' +a .0 7 C O O � � � � t 0 ` 0 O C O a) 0 O D N _ m °co 1� > m�-Q mm O O m �' o= ° O E 0 +r U) �c �' of m of N o U O C N � m � O It O C N00 ca m a) > J C a)in cep cn c co O CL (n O E a) c (n w a) Y Ud QD U O cnN U vi CY) N ca (vj J F— 0 4-1 ^ C r, E d' (O d7 J Y CO C r' O OU co '` Ec N M N N 0 a) O m -C 0) (7 O m 00i a) C +1 �( o. 0r) � om o 00 CL ocn �� 3 H U 1— (n 0 0 (n 2 (n a a Q (n Z) a Q 42 a 604 z 0 H 00 Lo r- U it Q C 00 �j0 U cr Q C 00 j0 N N U N Q CL o (1) Lo ca a o >- cn a >, op c . 0 O ai nj O U o o � d Q o_ j ca -j L c E c N o E c +� c o Z o O o Z �- U = - �"' o L C L +' , N E O -p O .0 c 0 Q. !E(n +O. O N 5 0) L = a) 0)vJ Q � Q C c t is 0 con' 7 U 00 UO v— U C-) M U N O — "O CD a) a0 'Q _ ca +1 O !E +J N t O > � ca L to H ca t f— i y Co + L O o Q oC H 4— O C C O N ca O L ++ Co o od cc+' U > C -p > C U Cl)O �+_ O CDO O O CDL a-.— +J Q — O fa U Q O a�� Q N ate' N Q. ocU) U J J L U > .Y > o ca o 0 > E -0 U) +co cn (0 'c E 0 Cl o 0 cn (n U cn Wn 0 O (L W F- Q F- U) H 0 W O a J a W 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) a) o m +� 0 O M 0 0 o a L\ N N T— E O Ca e- O m U m s L rn as a) o c rn o 0 M a� a) rn a) N U)N 00 Ln \ � \ 0 N d r a� m E m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p V O r 00 M r- Ln Ln a) LO O 00 LD M O 0 m s r t, a� E E 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 Lit 00 LA a) Ln C M U) O ai 0 V r = � O O N i,,, O C �,,, O O O LL7 n O O O O ^ O O y O C y O O O y O O 0 E M in a0i �° 0 00i 'a aD 00 n d M LO O U Q � yr v> � V w J W N � �L v = O C ai d s O J `L Y N a m '� o CL 0 p c o a c _ r ,- a y = O O Lu a0 0' CL �. C r R 'd G� -0a a C C) a N a O 1° s IM 0 m Lcts t a c0 m E a F- cy0 M 0 0 L O p R d a) � � w C d d .0 d 00 OC OC C7 Q w W Lu N p C7 Lu r c a UN M c0i rn J Cr U U. C > 0 La LL N N 0) LO O Or U Z = O r r C_ = 'C y C_ 'C b. LO (Ao o cc v0- 0 E E e=o o I- 2 2 a a U a O 34,4 VU0 a. DEPARTMENT REPORT: G' A U S of tNYO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Marni Kunsman, Recreation Supervisor VIA: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Direct DATE: January 18, 2000 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Community Services Department Report for the Month of December 1999 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2000: Feb 2 *Nabisco Championship Putting Contest Feb 4 *Free Eye Check and Mobil Solutions from the Braille Institute Van Feb 5 Introduction to Chinese Tea, Cultural History & Tasting, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club Feb 5 Golf, The Simple Truth, Golf Lessons, La Quinta Golf Ranch Feb 7 *Estate Planning Seminar, Two Sessions Feb 8 Weight Loss & Nutrition, Health Class, La Quinta Senior Center Feb 9 Start Your Own Internet Business, Evening Seminar, La Quinta Senior Center Feb 10 *Healthy Cooking Class Feb 11 First Annual Sweetheart's Dance, La Quinta Senior Center Multipurpose Room Feb 13 Adult Soccer Winter/Spring League Begins, La Quinta High School Feb 14 *Free Putting Contest Feb 14 *AARP Mature Driver's Course Feb 15 *Free Hearing Consultations Feb 16 Start Your Own Internet Business, Evening Seminar, La Quinta Senior Center Feb 17 *Valentine's Dance, Monthly Luncheon Feb 23 Low Impact Aerobics Classes, Session II, La Quinta High School Feb 26 Intermediate Microsoft Excel, Computer Seminar, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club Feb 29 *Leap Year Celebration Luncheon and Dixieland "Live" Music Feb 29 Women in Transition, Health Class, Session I, La Quinta Senior Center Feb 29 Ballroom Dance Lessons, Session II, La Quinta High School * Senior Center Program, Class or Event 3 4 j T4'y,, 4 4 Q" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of December 1999 Summary Sheet Program 1999 1998 Variance Meetings Per Month 1999 1998 Leisure Classes 149 62 87 16 8 Special Events 4162 4200 -38 3 2 Adult Sports 433 900 -527 12 9 Senior Center 1496 1508 -12 102 77 Program Totals 6240 6670 -490 133 96 Information/Referrals Senior Center 817 921 -104 12 15 Total 817 921 -104 12 15 Sports Complex Use AYSO 1100 600 500 10 10 Total 1100 600 500 10 10 Total Programs 8157 8191 -94L 1551 121 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 821 883 -62 Meals on Wheels 56 65 -9 Community Services 39 0 39 Total Volunteer Hours 916 948 -32 Monthlv Revenue Senior Center $ 4,316.00 $ 4,173.00 $ 143.00 Community Services $ 887.60 $ 1,168.00 $ (280.40) Rental Income $ 900.00 $ 2,145.00 $ (1,245.00 Total Revenue $ 6,103.60 $ 7,486.00 $ (1,382.40) Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $29,936.00 $18,347.66 $11,588.34 Community Services $27,762.10 $22,054.00 $5,708.10 Rental Income $4,035.00 $9,755.00 -$5,720.00 Total Revenue to Date $61,733.10 $50,156.66 $11,576.44 Community Services Program Report for December 1999 1999 1999 1998 1998 1999 1998 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Low Impact Aerobics 12 60 7 14 46 5 2 Beg. Computers Mon. 10 20 0 0 20 2 0 Beg. Computers Tues. 9 18 8 24 -6 2 3 Int. Computers Wed. 9 27 8 24 3 3 3 Mastering Excel 10 10 0 0 10 1 0 Introduction to Horses 3 6 0 0 6 2 0 Golf Short Game 8 8 0 0 8 1 0 Totals 1 611 1491 231 621 871 16 8 1999 1999 1998 1998 1999 1998 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events South Coast Plaza 12 12 0 0 12 1 0 Treelighting Ceremony 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 1 1 Breakfast with Santa 150 150 200 200 -50 1 1 Totals 1 41621 41621 42001 4200 -381 31 2 1999 1999 1998 1998 1999 1998 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Basketball M/T 73 73 0 0 73 6 0 Adult Soccer League 80 240 180 540 -360 3 , 3 Adult Co-ed Volleyball 40 120 60 360 -2401 3 6 Totals 1931 4331 2401 900 -5271 121 9 Senior Center Attendance 1999 1999 1998 1998 e istered Totalegistered Total Meetings Participants Participation articipants Participation Variance 1999 1998 Senior Activities Bridge, ACBL 209 209 221 221 -12 4 4 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 357 357 363 363 -6 11 11 Creative/Reminisce Writing Clubs 30 30 32 32 -2 7 3 Golden Tones 108 108 53 53 55 8 5 Ice Cream Social 9 9 35 35 -26 2 4 Monthly Luncheon 102 102 106 106 -4 1 1 Movie Time 47 47 20 20 27 8 6 Putting Tournament 16 16 0 0 16 1 0 Seminars 57 57 26 26 31 4 4 Television Viewing 33 33 59 59 -26 n/a n/a Tennis 136 136 34 34 102 15 3 Senior Activity Total 1104 1104 949 949 155 61 41 Senior Leisure Courses Ceramics 13 25 12 30 -5 3 3 Computer 8 8 40 40 -32 2 7 Computer Tutor 6 6 0 0 6 2 0 Dog Training Class 3 7 0 0 7 3 0 Exercise 30 275 44 444 -169 17 17 Golf Clinic 4 12 0 0 12 3 0 Senior Leisure Courses Total 64 333 96 514 -181 30 27 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 9 9 17 17 -8 2 3 Bridge Lessons 14 14 16 16 -2 3 2 Painting 13 13 10 10 3 2 3 Quilting 13 13 0 0 13 2 0 Tap Dance 10 10 2 2 8 2 1 Senior Leisure Classes Total 59 59 45 45 14 11 9 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1227 1496 1090 1508 -12 102 77 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 24 24 26 26 -2 2 2 Ambassadors 81 81 83 83 -2 n/a n/a Blood Pressure Check 26 26 57 57 -31 4 5 FIND Food Distribution 391 391 418 418 -27 5 5 Hearing Consultation 4 4 6 6 -2 1 1 Information/Referral/Outreach 282 282 313 313 -31 n/a n/a Medicare Consultation 5 5 3 3 2 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 4 4 15 15 -11 0 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 817 817 921 921 -104 12 15 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 1 2044 2313 2011 2429 -116 114 92 Page 3 3 4; COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Reports dated November 30, 1999 and Investment Summary for the Quarter ending December 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: DEPARTMENT REPORT: r7- uAto AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the November 30, 1999 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. I certify that the Quarterly Investment Summary accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City investment policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Dept, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Ily su John M. FalcorYer, Finance Director A rov d for subm' Sion y: T omas P. Genovese City Manager 349 Attachments: Revenue and Expenditures Report, November 30, 1999 Quarterly Investment Summary, December 31, 1999 3 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 FUNDS BUDGET RECEIVED REMAINING BUDGET % RECEIVED General Fund Revenues $11,728,871.00 $5,057,728.67 $6,671,142.33 43.1 % Library 200,000.00 378,720.96 (178,720.96) 189.4% Gas Tax Revenue 395,400.00 175,278.35 220,121.65 44.3% Cmaq/lstea 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Federal Assistance 250,400.00 0.00 250,400.00 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 2,806,700.00 0.00 2,806,700.00 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 1,100.00 48,872.55 (47,772.55) 4443.0% Local Law Enforcement 0.00 137.28 (137.28) N/A Lighting & Landscaping 764,400.00 32,658.14 731,741.86 4.3% Quimby 31,000.00 28,276.82 2,723.18 91.2% Infrastructure 1,497,500.00 694,482.68 803,017.32 46.4% Village Parking 1,600.00 235.32 1,364.68 14.7% South Coast Air Quality 25,244.00 5,918.66 19,325.34 23.4% Lq Public Safety Officer 2,200.00 2,058.74 141.26 93.6% Interest Allocation 0.00 320,694.91 (320,694.91) N/A Capital Improvement 41,075,898.69 3,995,991.70 37,079,906.99 9.7% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 1,486.29 (1,486.29) N/A Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 1,022,889.00 989,664.74 33,224.26 96.8% Arts In Public Places 302,700.00 119,426.63 183,273.37 39.5% Transportation 0.00 218,811.60 (218,811.60) N/A Parks & Recreation 0.00 148,170.64 (148,170.64) N/A Civic Center 0.00 211,942.93 (211,942.93) N/A Library Development 0.00 87,082.72 (87,082.72) N/A Community Center 0.00 39,331.45 (39,331.45) N/A Street Facility 0.00 7,340.98 (7,340.98) N/A Park Facility 0.00 2,779.50 (2,779.50) N/A La Quinta Financing Authority 697,670.00 476,691.34 220,978.66 68.3% RDA Project Area No. 1 17,061,398.00 2,147,076.05 14,914,321.95 33.4% RDA Project Area No. 2 6,314,469.00 461,932.25 5,852,536.75 22.7% Total $84,190,439.69 $15,652,791.90 $68,537 647.79 18.6% 3� 0 v' CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS 07/01/1999-11/3011999 FUNDS BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED REMAINING BUDGET % EXPENDED General Fund Revenues $12,786,956.12 $4,947,214.89 $17,225.00 $7,822,516.23 38.7% Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Gas Tax Revenue 395,400.00 164,750.00 0.00 230,650.00 41.7% Cmaq/Istea 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% N/A Federal Assistance 130,000.00 0.00 0.00 130,000.00 0.0% Proposed Assessment District 2,806,689.00 0.00 0.00 2,806,689.00 0.0% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 0.00 2,286.56 0.00 (2,286.56) N/A Local Law Enforcement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Lighting & Landscaping 777,105.31 318,500.00 0.00 458,605.31 41.0% Quimby 235,000.00 0.00 0.00 235,000.00 0.0% Infrastructure 7,561,424.25 862,038.90 0.00 6,699,385.35 11.4% Village Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A South Coast Air Quality 5,700.00 3,690.57 0.00 2,009.43 64.7% Lq Public Safety Officer 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.0% Interest Allocation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Capital Improvement 41,056,898.69 3,995,991.70 25,239.42 37,035,667.57 9.7% Lq Norte Capital Improvement 0.00 125,584.39 0.00 (125,584.39) N/A Urban Forestry 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.0% Equipment Replacement 889,923.00 24,335.25 0.00 865,587.75 2.7% Arts In Public Places 413,958.87 168,706.98 0.00 245,251.89 40.8% Transportation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Parks & Recreation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Civic Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Library Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Street Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Park Facility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A La Quinta Financing Authority 1,206,421.78 468,397.50 0.00 738,024.28 38.8% RDA Project Area No. 1 24,210,797.49 7,435,446.07 0.00 16,775,351.42 30.7% RDA Project Area No.2 11,977,632.39 219,899.89 0.00 11,757,732.50 1.8% Total $104,466,906.90 $18 736 842.70 $42,464.42 $85 687 599.78 17.9% 11. 'v J CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL TAXES: Property Tax No Low Property Tax Distribution Document Transfer Tax Sales Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Electrical Permits Mechanical Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: General Government Fees Finance Fees City Clerk Services Fees Community Services Fees Bldg & Safety Fees Community Development Fees Public Works Fees TOTAL FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Off Hwy Vehicle License Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc Fines AB939 CSA152 Assessment Historical Preservation Grant Sunline Transit CVAG County of Riverside -Grants State of California -Grants TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue Cash Over/(Short) TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFERIN TOTAL GENERAL FUND REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 502,300.00 91,686.47 410,613.53 18.25% 433,900.00 38,451.86 395,448.14 8.86% 222,000.00 93,525.75 128,474.25 42.13% 2,305,600.00 767,899.44 1,537,700.56 33.31% 3,050,000.00 655,905.86 2,394,094.14 21.51 % 381,900.00 83,407.28 298,492.72 21.84% 6,895,700.00 1,730,876.66 5,164,823.34 25.10% 110,800.00 41,324.40 69,475.60 37.30% 8,100.00 2,724.50 5,375.50 33.64% 412,500.00 572,891.68 (160,391.68) 138.88% 86,700.00 96,698.75 (9,998.75) 111.53% 68,000.00 101,031.40 (33,081.40) 148.58% 35,800.00 52,007.00 (16,207.00) 145.27% 44,200.00 24,790.00 19,410.00 56.09% 766,100.00 891,467.73 (125,367.73) 116.36% 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00% 50.00 21.65 28.35 43.30% 1,000.00 244.30 755.70 24.43% 124,210.00 48,119.20 76,090.80 38.74% 298,400.00 343,106.70 (44,706.70) 114.98% 107,800.00 83,600.78 24,199.22 77.55% 271,100.00 333,195.43 (62,095.43) 122.90% 802,610.00 808,288.06 (5,678.06) 100.71 % 910,900.00 435,492.75 475,407.25 47.81% 250.00 232.62 17.38 93.05% 14,400.00 19,915.32 (5,515.32) 138.30% 22,300.00 8,419.87 13,880.13 37.76% 4,600.00 1,478.43 3,121.57 32.14% 91,100.00 38,870.91 52,229.09 42.67% 109,200.00 127,984.00 (18,784.00) 117.20% 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 471,111.00 471,111.00 0.00 100.00% 55,000.00 41,413.84 13,586.16 75.30% 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00% 1,693,861.00 1,144,918.74 548,942.26 67.59% 1,464,000.00 474,578.63 989,421.37 32.42% 55,600.00 4,886.12 50,713.88 8.79% 0.00 426.17 (426.17) N/A 55,600.00 5,312.29 50,287.71 9.55% 51,000.00 2,286.56 48,713.44 4.48% 11,728,871.00 5,057,728.67 6,671,142.33 43.12% 353 �U0 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11130/1999 ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL LIBRARY: County of Riverside Interest TOTAL LIBRARY GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107.5 Interest TOTAL GAS TAX CMAQ/ISTEA REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 200,000.00 376,111.58 (176,111.58) 188.06% 0.00 2,609.38 (2,609.38) N/A 200,000.00 378,720.96 (178 720.96) 189.36% 123,200.00 55,372.20 67,827.80 44.94% 89,200.00 39,600.51 49,599.49 44.40% 172,500.00 74,382.43 98,117.57 43.12% 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 100.00% 5,500.00 923.21 4,576.79 16.79% 395,400.00 175,278.35 220121.65 44.33% CMAQ/ISTEA Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL CMAQ/ISTEA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant 250,400.00 0.00 250,400.00 0.00% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 250,400.00 0.00 250 400.00 0.00% PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Assessment Bond Proceeds 2,806,700.00 0.00 2,806,700.00 0.00% TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRIC 2,806,700.00 0.00 2,806 700.00 0.00% SLESF(COPS)REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 0.00 48,372.24 (48,372.24) N/A Interest 1,100.00 500.31 599.69 45.48% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 1,100.00 48,872.55 (47,772.55) 4442.96% LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE: LLEBG Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Interest 0.00 137.28 (137.28) N/A Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL LLEBG 0.00 137.28 (137.28) N/A LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment 764,200.00 32,805.00 731,395.00 4.29% Interest 200.00 (146.86) 346.86 -73.43% TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 764,400.00 32,658.14 731,741.86 4.27% QUIMBY REVENUE: Quimby Fees 20,000.00 26,573.80 (6,573.80) 132.87% Interest 11,000.00 1,703.02 9,296.98 15.48% TOTAL QUIMBY 31,000.00 28,276.82 2,723.18 91.22% 3�J51 0 � 7 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Infrastructure Fee Interest TOTALINFRASTRUCTURE VILLAGE PARKING REVENUE: Interest TOTAL VILLAGE PARKING SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: S.C.A.Q. Contribution Interest TOTAL SCAQ LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG Funding CVWD County of Riverside State of Ca- Office Emer. Services RCTC Funding IID SB300 Funding Surface Transportation SB821-Bicycle Path Grant APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Transfers in From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE LQ NORTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Prepayment Bond Proceeds Interest TOTAL LQ NORTE CIP REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 1,066,500.00 613,746.24 452,753.76 57.55% 431,000.00 80,736.44 350,263.56 18.73% 1,497,500.00 694,482.68 803,017.32 46.38% 1,600.00 235.32 1,364.68 14.71 % 1,600.00 235.32 1,364.68 14.71 % 21,244.00 5,744.68 15,499.32 27.04% 4,000.00 173.98 3,826.02 4.35% 25,244.00 5,918.66 19,325.34 23.45% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.00% 200.00 58.74 141.26 29.37% 2,200.00 2,058.74 141.26 93.58% 0.00 320,694.91 (320,694.91) N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 320,694.91 (320,694.91) N/A 12,138,823.50 1,899,197.09 10,239, 626.41 15.65% 1,753,171.00 0.00 1,753,171.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A (29,834.40) 0.00 (29,834.40) 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00% 67,000.00 0.00 67,000.00 0.00% 1,741,308.00 0.00 1,741,308.00 0.00% 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00% 372,610.00 168,746.98 203,863.02 45.29% 799,956.02 377,498.76 422,457.26 47.19% 24,152,864.57 1,550,548.87 22,602,315.70 6.42% 41,075,898.69 3,995,991.70 37,079,906.99 9.73% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 1,486.29 (1,486.29) N/A 0.00 1,486.29 (1,486.29) N/A 355 v 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) URBAN FORESTRY Grant Revenue Interest TOTAL URBAN FORESTRY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.00% FMP Equipment Charges 510,578.00 510,783.00 (205.00) 100.04% Interest 41,200.00 7,770.74 33,429.26 18.86% Transfers In 471,111.00 471,111.00 0.00 100.00% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,022,889.00 989,664.74 33,224.26 96.75% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: * Arts in Public Places Deposits 275,500.00 113,767.58 161,732.42 41.29% • Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Interest 27,200.00 5,659.05 21,540.95 20.81 % TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 302,700.00 119,426.63 183,273.37 39.45% • These amounts are deposits and are treated as liabilities and not as revenues. TRANSPORTATION Developer fees Interest TOTAL TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION CIVIC CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees Interest TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 0.00 218,480.07 (218,480.07) N/A 0.00 331.53 (331.53) N/A 0.00 218,811.60 (218,811.60) N/A 0.00 147,936.00 (147,936.00) N/A 0.00 234.64 (234.64) N/A 0.00 148,170.64 (148,170.64) N/A 0.00 211,610.81 (211,610.81) N/A 0.00 332.12 (332.12) N/A 0.00 211,942.93 (211,942.93) N/A 0.00 86,945.00 (86,945.00) N/A 0.00 137.72 (137.72) N/A 0.00 87,082.72 (87,082.72) N/A (� 3 5 03 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL (continued) COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees Interest TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER STREET FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY Developer fees Interest TOTAL PARK FACILITY REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 0.00 39,269.00 (39,269.00) N/A 0.00 62.45 (62.45) N/A 0.00 39,331.45 (39 331.45) N/A 0.00 7,329.89 (7,329.89) N/A 0.00 11.09 (11.09) N/A 0.00 7,340.98 (7,340.98) N/A 0.00 2,776.00 (2,776.00) N/A 0.00 3.50 (3.50) N/A 0.00 2,779.50 (2,779.50) N/A 35w c 013 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999-11/30/1999 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 398,100.00 124,325.07 0.00 273,774.93 31.23% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 579,250.00 213,661.79 0.00 365,588.21 36.89% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 811,650.00 361,487.82 0.00 450,162.18 44.54% PERSONNEL/RISK MGT 438,750.00 97,434.18 1,125.00 340,190.82 22.21% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2,227,750.00 796,908.86 1,125.00 1,429,716.14 35.77% FINANCE: FISCAL SERVICES 490,250.00 180,011.54 0.00 310,238.46 36.72% CENTRAL SERVICES 489,246.00 215,975.34 0.00 273,270.66 44.14% TOTAL FINANCE 979,496.00 395,986.88 0.00 583,509.12 40.43% CITY CLERK 347,150.00 130,928.86 0.00 216,221.14 37.72% COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 231,970.00 PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 565,569.00 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS 67,750.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 865,289.00 POLICE BUILDING & SAFETY: 3,186,149.00 78,915.55 0.00 153,054.45 34.02% 197,347.99 0.00 368,221.01 34.89% 22,095.40 0.00 45,654.60 32.61 % 298,358.94 0.00 566,930.06 34.48% 687,150.30 0.00 2,498,998.70 21.57% BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN 189,150.00 80,191.46 0.00 108,958.54 42.40% CODE COMPLIANCE 434,193.00 158,244.95 0.00 275,948.05 36.45% ANIMAL CONTROL 163,602.00 52,959.60 0.00 110,642.40 32.37% BUILDING 362,873.00 206,409.68 0.00 156,463.32 56.88% EMERGENCY SERVICES 46,900.00 23,378.77 0.00 23,521.23 49.85% FIRE 20,000.00 5,833.57 0.00 14,166.43 29.17% CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS 1,141,853.00 801,706.53 0.00 340,146.47 70.21% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 2,358,571.00 1,328,724.56 0.00 1,029,846.44 56.34% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ADMIN 561,300.00 143,452.66 0.00 417,847.34 25.56% CURRENT PLANNING 919,049.00 219,022.02 0.00 700,026.98 23.83% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,480,349.00 362,474.68 0.00 1,117,874.32 24.49% PUBLIC WORKS: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 183,350.00 66,294.49 0.00 117,055.51 36.16% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 670,710.00 254,474.94 0.00 416,235.06 37.94% MAINT/OPERATIONS - STREETS 1,257,024.00 298,167.31 5,700.00 953,156.69 23.72% MAINT/OPERATIONS - LTG/LANDSCAPING 1,074,503.00 470,179.34 10,400.00 593,923.66 43.76% CAPITAL PROJECTS 155,005.00 84,349.84 0.00 70,655.16 54.42% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 3,340,592.00 1,173,465.92 16,100.00 2,151,026.08 35.13% TRANSFERS OUT 1,674,921.34 947,397.72 0.00 727,523.62 56.56% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (3,673,311.22) (1,174,181.83) 0.00 (2,499,129.39) 31.97% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 12,786,956.12 4,947,214.89 17 225.00 7,822,516.23 38 69% 330 Oil CITY OF LA QUINTA OTHER CITY FUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY LIBRARY FUND: PROJECT EXPENDITURES GAS TAX FUND: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND QUIMBY FUND: TRANSFER OUT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 07/01/1999 - 11/30/1999 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 395,400.00 164,750.00 0.00 230,650.00 41.67% 235,000.00 0.00 0.00 235,000.00 0.00% 130 000.00 0.00 0.00 130 000.00 0.00% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 5,700.00 3,690.57 0.00 2,009.43 64.75% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 5,700.00 3,690.57 0.00 2,009.43 64.75% CMAQ/ISTEA TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00% LLEBG FUND TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A SLEF (COPS) TRANSFER OUT 0.00 2,286.56 0.00 (2,286.56) N/A LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 764,400.00 318,500.00 0.00 445,900.00 41.67% TRANSFER OUT 12,705.31 0.00 0.00 12,705.31 0.00% FAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND TOTAL LTG/LANDSCAPING FUND 777,105.31 318,500.00 0.00 458,605.31 40.99% INFRASTRUCTURE: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 203,910.00 84,962.50 0.00 118,947.50 41.67% TRANSFER OUT 7,357,514.25 777,076.40 0.00 6,580,437.85 10.56% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 7,561,424.25 862 038.90 0.00 6,699,385.35 11.40% PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TRANSFER OUT 2,806,689.00 0.00 0.00 2,806,689.00 0.00% 3553 CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/1999 - 11/30/1999 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REMAINING % BY DEPARTMENT BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED TRANSPORTATION Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A PARKS & RECREATION Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A CIVIC CENTER Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A COMMUNITY CENTER Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A STREET FACILITY Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL STREET FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A PARK FACILITY Program Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A Transfer Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TOTAL PARK FACILITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 40,139,523.47 3,970,113.20 25,239.42 36,144,170.85 9.89% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 917,375.22 25,878.50 0.00 891,496.72 2.82% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 41,056,898.69 3,995,991.70 25 239.42 37,035,667.57 9.73%_ ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 41,548.87 160.00 0.00 41,388.87 N/A CIP EXPENSES 372,410.00 168,546.98 0.00 203,863.02 45.26% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 413,958.87 168,706.98 0.00 245,251.89 40.75% LQ NORTE (97-1) CIP FUND PROJECT EXPENSES 0.00 125,584.39 0.00 (125,584.39) N/A URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TRANSFER OUT 11,000.00 0.00 0.00 11,000.00 0.00% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 889,923.00 24,335.25 0.00 865,587.75 2.73% 360 013 City of La Quinta Quarterly Investment Summary - Footnote 1 December31, 1999 of U.S. Treasury U.S. Treasury U.S. Treasury Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Local Agency Investment Fund Less %Attributable to RDA Less % Attributable to Financing Authority Total City Pooled Investments Treasury Note Treasury Note Treasury Note Discount Note Note Note Note State Pool Maturity Date Per Value Market Value Amortized Cost 31-Oct-99 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,026,185 31-May-00 4,000,000 4,016,250 4,043,728 30-Nov-01 4,000,000 3,975,000 3,981,618 01-Aug-00 5,000,000 4,730,700 4,837,122 23-Mar-00 5,000,000 4,995,050 5,006,202 21-Jan-00 3,000,000 2,998,125 3,000,083 27-Jun-00 5,000,000 4,869,950 4,870,722 Next Day 517,036 517,036 517,036 NextDay 5,072,963 5,072,963 5,072,963 $35,589,999 $35,175,074 $35,355,659 (6,725,453) 7,477 Footnote 1 - The Quarterly Investment Report does not include the City of La Quinta checking account, sweep account, Housing Program account or petty cash account $28,637,683 361 01 DEPARTMENT REPORT: g— A' � oz V S OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: January 18, 2000 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of December 1999 Attached please find the following: 1. Summary of Citizen Request reports received; 2. Summary of Graffiti reports received; 3. Plan Check Applications received; 4. Encroachment Permits received; 5. List of Capital Improvement Project status; 6. Maintenance Report; 7. Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico Traffic Signal Warrant Memorandum; 8. Inco Homes - Coldbrook Lane Landscaping Memorandum. �v Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer 36 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2000\0001 Dept.wpd a) N 0 U) W D 0 LU Mc Z W N J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 00 CY) a) CY) 07 On d] cF) c3) 0) a) a) a) 0) o) a) a) cF) 07 0) On M M M M M M M O O O a) O M a) a) a) 0) a) M O 0)' 0) a) a) a) 07 0) CA 07 a) CA 0) CF) 07 On 0) a) CA 00 0) a) I� �— �MNNN MC'9MM0000O0000 MI*- M 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0— 0 0 0— -- N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ca 0 0 co 0 d S co 0 00 co co C6 o 0 0 0 c a 0 0 f— H P 0 c O c0 mft FU— O O) N C U •� 0 O _C L .— � d ' +O co O 0 0 f0 +, 0 E c0 U J +, O 0 7 m 0 0 0) N O a� a 3� 0 0 0 L c 0 Q) CO O o O 0 -0Z 'O Q a y c C O _ _O — > C U) D _00 O _ y C L 0 -00 - Q J m 0 Q CM 0 00 L c0 U y L N "d V ?` O "0 O Q +' Q> c 2 C` m c 0 y cm L y C O O -CFL= fDcm f0 c:O_ m Nco C 0 0 �C ++ ; C c w CD '` N -0 O 00 Y O "0 CO O N O 0) O a y >' C O U c0 = C N = L 0) 0 to -0 @ C ` '+. C — y L f0 0 L y U c0 V > O N += N N 0 Y_ c 0 N f6 C f6 N 0 O c0 '++ U 7 ++ 0 C 'C c0 0 IC 7 L Q) 0 U y> (0 +J O 0 _ co 0) 0 -0 C C L +� p CL C y y❑ 0 L i= O y = 0 +0+ y 0 O U >O C = .. f0 dS a O 06 U co ` O d N= N fd m o2f 7 L 0 0 L D O L O N "0 0 c>>6 0 O) C C o �ma = = o m °�❑L FU > �� 0 c ,� > c CO: � @ rn co 0 0 L } 0 ti +0+ L y 0 0 0 0 L dS ❑ y LO O +J O aCD y, 0 0> CO a�� o_ pm a� cm pm €.; >> n a �J U) >� > cc Z >>mad._ a> J J 0 U CA Cn N y + f6 L O 0 C f0 C: 0 + + + O 0 'p 0 > 0 N DO CA C c C 0 (� C N y U) co = 75 0 O 0 v ��U� 0mUUUOC 0 0 0 7 O mU 0 mLU L L L ❑ ., � 2 L @ 0 J a C m Y Y Y Y J ell �EEs O (O h O N !A N 7 O co •a 7 U N U y U y U O a a>i a>i c a U w - 0 I 0 1 0 U U U N U y 0 0 0 Coco 0 C 0 0 O c 0 C C � C= 0 0 0 C C C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 _ c�0 _ c�0 _ +@ [. f6 C (0 +0, f0 CO f0 f0 > > > > > U > > > > > U U U > > > > -� cr iaao�o�n00cD 'r rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn 0) ma)CD0)m0) mmCnmma)cnm0)m0) mmCD rn rnrnrnrnrnrn rnrnrnrnrnrna)rnrnrnrn rnrnrn NNN MMMMCOCOOOOOOOOOM CMI�M 0 000000 00000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w N M d M Ln -ct M CO LO O N Cfl M [t Lo CO M N 00 00 O O M O M d' O c'o LO Lo M M �t d' d' 0 CM M �t LO �t m Lo m I Itt LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3f3 t/ u 4 c 0 L n 0 aD N I I J W H N c C a E O U c 0 m C Q II c E n 0 N > d 0 C 0 C n O rn rn F- CC O a w cr- U- LL Q 0 36 Il 003 N 0 W W U W Z 0 H Q J a a a Y W Z Q J a O O N cn H W aa_ r Z W 2 U Q O cc U Z W L L L L L L L L L L L L L O O O O O O O O _O _O _O _O _O _O _O _O _O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N r N N N N T N N N N N N T M LA LA 00 T LA Lp LO LA LA U) M LO O LO O O T T cV M T CV T N m T T Q T M T N N M M T N I— r N N N N CO N M N't ,I T T O O O T O O O O T T O T O T O O O O O O O I� O O O f_: O I 10 N N ti 0 69 EA 64 69 69 64 E; C U C E L L > C N .c C cu ca O _ _x L L E Q� L 0 E c co c c - 06 Co U)�m 3a)u)Em �3 c N •V O— O 0 0 O O V O O O N Y a) O co ;t .V O 3 0 ( N O +L O L L a O C N L a C T O N cL° co U) L O fn N Lo m E C s F� O Y N (9 O 0) � 06 7— cA > L O (o C L a +O+ N O m co jd OA� M �—� .O LO in 02S C� y co O >+ N y W T y E L' I L cn `— C a 0 M N c0 O cn o T �U h co _ I m 0 N •C '� U T v7 (n W W cm p O E 'c = �` O O O T ES /N (�0 L T V VI .� •� T W IL 2 O Q mQ Z� O O)O CU M, cp COW Q M�� c>>°U' ILO LO =3�Q OZ2QZ0W >M 00 O LO > Ln O (o l(i 00 LIB clco) t Q O 0— Co co O I-- 0 0 u t m c D E O to 00 NNNco a)N aN 000m t co a N ►-��Lnu-Lo Lo F- tiLoQ�a � co i c X > U) C U X f0 U o M Q O 0) O p O L co 0) 4) O L O j� cow E E> E E Eye E E rnN E O co COY cOn cOn � VOi to m cOn U cu ccoo C O cn U E O 2U UUU cZ5 c�.co J- 0 U)E cn cnm� 0 W C EJ� m m m O UC7U °CDU c °p°d = Z . O y U) c cu m cUpL Opp UUU-aU cO Lo W u) � p O O O 0 O O ccu E Y U U U- U) U) U) p U) F- 0 -:5 O -�t Lo 1-- 00 O O T N M� o r- O O T N M :++0 O O M O O O O O O O O O T T T T ;.. O O O O O T T T T T T T T T T T T M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)O 0)i' O O O 0) O O O O O O O O O O O O O T T T T T T T T T - T T T T T T T O O O O O T T T T ,-- T T T N N M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 360 U05 MONTHLY PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY Capital Improvement Projects F/Y 1999/2000 December 1999 Project Name/No. Contract Complete Complete Scheduled Amount last to Date Construction Month Start/Completion City Entrance Monuments 98-05 $257,100 0% 65% August, Feb, 2000 Award 5/18/99 1999 Miles Ave/Washington St. $1,310,649 0% 100% Sept 21, Mar 12, 1999 Imprvmts / 98-07 Award 6/22/99 `98 Washington St. Widening/ Ave 50 $2,428,700 0% 38% Sept, 1999 March, 2000 to Village Ctn. 98-09 Award 6/22/99 Parc La Quinta Electrical Under $126,430 0% 100% Jan 1999 July 1999 grounding 98-14 Various Citywide Street $236,793 0% 32% Sept 1999 Jan 2000 Improvements, Signals, 98-15 Award 9/7/99 Fritz Burns Park/ Bear Creek Bike $219,807 0% 60% July 1999 July 2000 Path Retrofit/rest stops 98-16 Avenue 50 Pavement $259,783 0% 0% Dec 1999 Jan 2000 Rehabilitation 98-17 Award 10/19/99 Ave 50 Median Landscape 99-01 $210,000 0% 100% July, 1999 Sept, 1999 Award 5/18/99 Jefferson Street Improvements $6,876,876 0% 0% Feb, 2000 Jan, 2001 HWY111 to Ave 54, 99-05 Award 6/29/99 Tampico, Sinaloa & Ave 52 $346,211 0% 0% Jan. , 2000 March, 2000 T:\PWDEPPCIPDIV\MPSSMST—REPORT\9912Mpsmst.wpd 3 67 Revised 114100 0106 mi ' W1 13111111 111111ia1111111111111111i111111111111i111 �milli 1IIIIIIIIIII11 ad ad 1111Ilia 21 �IIIIIIIIIIIIii11111111111111111111111111111ii1�1 "I 11111'�1 ICJ 1� 111� I� 11111111111111 It 11111111111111 '1111111111111��11111111111111111111111111111111 -3111111111111111111i�'1�1111111111111111111111111 �1111111111111111111ii11111111�1��111111111111�1 �1111111111111111111111111111�1111111111111iiii�1 "1 RI :�1111111111111111�11ii1111111111111111111111i111 ��11111111111111111111111111111111111111111iiiill - 3111111111111�111111111111111111111111111111111 ��11111111111111111111�111111111��111111111111 �111111111111111111111111111111��111111111111� WI 1 .�111�11111111111111ii'1111111111�1�11111�11111111 • 111111111111111ii1111ii1111111111111111111111iiiill -3111111111111�111111111111111111111111111111111 �1111111111��11111111111111111111111111111ii1�1 �111111111111�111111111111111�1111111111111�1�1 1 w1 . �1111111111111ii111ii1111111111111111111111111ii11 �1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 -3111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ��1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 �1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 T4tyl 4 4 Q" MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members /� FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer L,�/" DATE: January 18, 2000 SUBJECT: Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico Traffic Signal Warrant During the December 7, 1999, City Council Meeting, City Council requested the status of the traffic signal warrant analysis at the intersection of Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico. An analysis was completed back in May 1999 and it was determined that the intersection of Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico met five warrants for a traffic signal. Although the warrants have been met, that traffic signal was not identified in the Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). That signal will be included in the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 CIP for design and installation sometime after July 2000. This signal design and installation will take place along with the improvements of Phase VI if the City Council so desires. Therefore, an economy of scale may be achieved due to the signal project being bid as part of the larger project and the signal may be coordinated with the ultimate curb return plan for Avenida Bermudas as it intersects Calle Tampico. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. CAV/acs cc: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager John Freeland, Senior Engineer 363 r:-99— uo.' Page 1 of 1 T4'!t 4 4a QumAu MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer Gv` - DATE: January 10, 2000 SUBJECT: Inco Homes - Coldbrook Lane Landscaping During the January 4, 2000 City Council Meeting, Mr. Richard Petri, a resident in the Inco Development, located south of Miles Avenue and east of Washington Street, voiced his concern regarding the entrance landscaping to the development off of Coldbrook Lane. Mr. Petri stated that the area needs to be maintained and watered, and the plant material is dying. The Inco developers were conditioned to complete the landscaping along Miles Avenue and Coldbrook Lane as part of the conditions of development. The landscaping was not completed per the plans and has never been accepted into the City's maintenance system. On May 16, 1995, bonds were reduced for this landscaping, since the work was complete. However, since the tract was not complete, the landscaping was not accepted into the City's maintenance system. Inco Homes did not properly maintain the landscaping and subsequently filed bankruptcy. Mr. Petri contacted the City after Inco went bankrupt and voiced his concern regarding the deteriorated state of the landscaping. City staff was working with the Surety company, Insco/Dico, in order to have the final conditions completed through the remaining bonds. In order to attempt to preserve landscaping that was in place, the City reactivated the water meters to provide irrigation and prevent further deterioration. During the week of January 3, 2000, City staff met with representatives of Insco/Dico to discuss the completion of the landscaping. Insco/Dico wishes to complete the landscaping and turn over the maintenance to the City. However, there is insufficient funding through the bonding to complete the landscaping exactly per plan. This is due to bond reduction for work completed prior to the bankruptcy of Inco Homes. City staff is working with the job superintendent representative of Insco/Dico in order to redefine the required work and complete the project as close to the approved plans as possible so the City may take over maintenance of the landscaping. It is anticipated that the Insco/Dico landscape contractor will begin restoration work within the next two weeks after City staff and Insco/Dico can redefine the work. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. CAV/acs 3 00 ltiJ� Page 1 of 1 Department Report No. q - A POLICE REPORT Inside this issue: December Significant Ac- tivity Report School Resource Officer Reports for November/ December November Crime Statistics Summary La Quinta Target Team De- cember Report Special points of interest from the Crime Statistic Summary: Just a reminder that the statistical summary figures include "attempts." For instance, the November Homicide statistic was in reality an attempt homicide. A year-to-date comparison in the major felony (Part 1) crimes Indi- cates either a decrease or very little change. • While not as high as last month, misdemeanor thefts are above recorded averages. • Historically, Burglary statistics seem to climb in November. Year- to-date is still considerably lower for 1999. Vandalism is again a major con- cern as it continues a sharp in- crease. Target team members will be dedicating a portion of their time to investigations and appre- hension programs. NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 1999 La Quinta Police Joined Residents in Celebrating a Safe New Year With all the plans in place and Officers deployed, Y2K may have actually had an impact on illegal activity. Perhaps it was the high visibility of police units... DUI checkpoints... bicycle patrols... neighborhood contacts ... the media hype ... or, just good plan- ning. Whatever the rea- sons, the sirens were quiet and our residents seemed to enjoy one of the safest holiday seasons ever. Chief Deputy Steve Bloomquist Leaves the Desert January 12th marked the last day of 'desert' duty for Chief Deputy Steve Bloomquist. He has been transferred to West River- side County Sheriffs Op- erations. Chief Bloomquist has served as the Sheriffs executive administrator for eastern county operations for the past two years. Chief Deputy Neil Lingle, past commander of the Palm Desert Station and ad- ministrator for Coroner Op- erations, has returned to the desert to fill this position. LA QUINTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Significant Incidents / Highlights DECEMBER 1999 CALLS FOR SERVICE 12/1(Wednesday) 39 12/17 (Friday) 40 12/2 (Thursday) 42 12/18 (Saturday) 41 12/3 (Friday) 42 12/19 (Sunday) 33 12/4 (Saturday) 45 12/20 (Monday) 43 12/5 (Sunday) 32 12/21 (Tuesday) 55 12/6 (Monday) 36 12/22 (Wednesday) 38 12/7 (Tuesday) 42 12/23 (Thursday) 62 12/8 (Wednesday) 42 12/24 (Friday) 36 12/9 (Thursday) 52 12/25 (Saturday) 23 12/10 (Friday) 47 12/26 (Sunday) 28 12/11 (Saturday) 26 12/27 (Monday) 49 12/12 (Sunday) 40 12/28 (Tuesday) 41 12/13 (Monday) 46 12/29 (Wednesday) 33 12/14 (Tuesday) 39 12/30 (Thursday) 51 12/15 (Wednesday) 37 12/31 (Friday) Unavailable 12/16 (Thursday) 53 TOTAL CALLS: 1233 (Averaging 41 calls per day for the reporting period) (Includes self -initiated activity and citations issued) SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY 12/01 A fifteen year old, female juvenile was committed to Mental Health for evaluation after she made threats to kill herself 12/02 On -going investigation by the Coachella Valley Community Services District Team resulted in the recovery of several items of stolen property in the 51-600 block of Ave. Velasco. Original burglary occurred in Thermal. District Team members received information from an informant that led them to the stolen property on Ave. Velasco. Report of a burglary in the parking lot of Home Depot. A cell phone was reported stolen from a trailer in the parking lot. Phone belonged to Home Depot. Suspect arrested for shoplifting and being under the influence of a narcotic at Wal-Mart. 12/03 Probation search was conducted by the La Quinta Target Team in the 52-900 block of Ave. Vallejo. Two suspects were arrested for possession of narcotics for sale. Search was part of a multi- agency/multi-jurisdictional program. 12/04 Attempt vehicle theft occurred in the 52-000 block of Ave. Navarro. Report of a burglary in the 53-000 block of Ave. Juarez. Unknown suspect(s) entered an unsecured garage and stole two mountain bikes. 12/05 A 36 year old Indio resident was arrested for possession of a controlled substance at the La Quinta Car Wash. 12/06 A 33 year old La Quinta resident was arrested for possession of a controlled substance (Marijuana) and an active misdemeanor warrant. Same was arrested out of a vehicle stop. Non -injury traffic accident at Hwy 111 and Plaza La Quinta. Vehicle versus pedestrian. Primary collision factor of 21954(a) CVC (Pedestrian in the roadway). 12/07 Nothing notable. 12/08 Subject arrested for DUI at Eisenhower Dr. and Washington St.. 12/09 Two subjects arrested for burglary at Wal-Mart after they were detained by security for stealing cigarettes. One was a 33 year old Thousand Palms resident and the other was a 29 year old Desert Hot Springs resident. The 1000 Palms resident was also detained on a parole hold. 12/10 Attempted vehicle theft occurred in the 52-300 block of Ave. Herrera. 12/11 Nothing notable. 12/12 A 45 year old La Quinta resident was arrested for a felony warrant for Grand Theft. 12/13 Report of the theft of a firearm from a vehicle at the La Quinta Car Wash. An unloaded .22 caliber pistol was stolen from the victims vehicle while it was being washed. 12/14 Grand theft of tools from a vehicle reported in the parking lot of the Beer Hunter on Hwy 111. Several tool boxes and tools were stolen from the bed of the victims truck. Non -injury traffic accident at Washington St. and Miles Ave.. Three vehicle, rear -end collision. Primary collision factor of speeding. Non -injury traffic accident reported at Hwy I I I and Adams St.. A vehicle turning westbound onto Hwy I I I was hit broadside by a vehicle southbound on Adams St.. PCF is unknown. Both parties claim the light at the intersection was not functioning properly. No independent witnesses. 12/15 Nothing notable. 12/16 Subject was arrested at Wal-Mart for robbery after he took merchandise from the store and assaulted the store employees when they attempted to detain him. He was also arrested for possession of a deadly weapon. F4 37 12/17 Nothing notable. 12/18 A 25 year old Indio resident was arrested for violation of parole at Calle Tampico and Eisenhower Dr.. He was arrested after a traffic stop where he provided false information and identification to the deputy conducting the stop. A 26 year old La Quinta resident was a passenger in the same vehicle and was also arrested for possession of a controlled substance. A DUI checkpoint was conducted on Hwy 111 in front of Eagle Hardware Store. One Rancho Mirage resident was arrested for DUI. 12/19 A vehicle burglary was reported in the 52-000 block of Ave. Alvarado. Golf equipment was stolen from the rear of a locked Jeep. 12/20 A stolen vehicle was recovered at Ave. Alvarado and Calle Durango. The driver and sole occupant fled on foot from Deputies. An Indio resident was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon after he struck a co-worker with a large heavy-duty electrical cord. Same occurred at a construction site at Sunnybrook and Bayberry Dr.. Victim sustained a one inch laceration to his forehead and was transported to JFK for treatment. 12/21 Minor injury traffic accident reported at Ave. Martinez and Calle Nogales. A 37 year old Palm Desert resident failed to stop at the stop sign and struck a La Quinta man who was riding his bicycle. 12/22 Two Palm Desert residents were arrested for theft at Wal-Mart. Both were booked for burglary. 12/23 Nothing notable. 12/24 Subject arrested at Wal-mart for burglary. Same subject also had three active warrants for shoplifting. 12/25 Nothing notable. 12/26 Grand theft of pool equipment reported in the 45-000 block of Deerbrook. 12/27 Seven counts of malicious mischief reported in the 54-000 block of Ave. Herrera. A total of seventeen tires were cut/slashed on seven different vehicles at four different residences. Total damage estimated at $1350.00. 12/28 Vehicle theft occurred in the 78-800 block of Via Carmel. A silver, 1998 Mercedes was stolen. Suspect is the son of the victim. A 34 year old Palm Desert resident was arrested for a felony warrant. 12/29 A 36 year old Cathedral City resident was arrested for embezzlement of funds from the La Quinta 313 McDonalds, on Hwy 111. Suspect was due to make a deposit of restaurant daily receipts, but embezzled a portion of the money and deposited the money in her personal account. 12130 A 25 year old La Quinta resident was arrested for a felony warrant at Wal-Mart. Warrant was for possessing stolen property A 38 year old La Quinta resident was arrested for felony possession of a controlled substance after a traffic stop at Hwy I I I and Dune Palms Dr.. 12/31 A 34 year old Indio resident was arrested at Lake Cahuilla for possession of a controlled substance and an active warrant. A 25 year old passenger in the same vehicle was also arrested for an active felony warrant. Traffic accident, minor injuries, DUI related, occurred on Calle Tecate and Ave. Herrera. The driver was transported to Desert Hospital for unknown injuries and a passenger in the same vehicle sustained a minor hand injury. Vehicle burglary occurred on Simon Dr. and Hwy 111. Two suspects forced entry into a Cadillac parked on Simon Drive but fled when an employee who was driving by, stopped to investigate the flashing lights on the vehicle. Suspects fled to the parking lot of Eagle Hardware and got into a, waiting vehicle. Report of a "Found Child" in the area of Calle Sonora and Avenida Velasco. A small two year old juvenile wandering the streets, was found by a private citizen. The mother was located a short time later. The juvenile had walked away from the yard of his residence. Subject arrested for DUI and possession of a controlled substance at Eisenhower Dr. and Calle Tampico. 4 34 Fdverside County sheriff k Department La Quinta Target Team Monthly Report December 1999 The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of December. Ongoing investigations 3 Parole searches 2 Arrests/Filings 10 Consent searches I0 Vehicle stops/checks Q2 Meetings Y. Business contacts 104 Recovered stolen property $150.00 Investigation assists 3 Citations 26 Arrest warrants served 0 Surveillance 1 Arrest warrants attempted 0 Property checks 2 Programs 3 Civil commitments 1 Pedestrian checks 5 Bicycle time 60 hours Crime prevention hours 3 Training hours 0 Bar checks 4 Illegal drugs seized 7 grams of Back-ups 5 meth Follow-ups _ 6 10 grams of Search warrants 1 marijuana Probation searches 2 Total Mileage: 540 i 37 Arrests and Filings ♦ LQ resident arrested for possession and sales of methamphetamine (meth). ♦ Q resident arrested for possession and sales of marijuana. ♦ LQ resident arrested for possession of marijuana. ♦ Ariz. resident arrested for a vehicle code violation. ♦ Indio resident arrested for strong arm robbery and carrying a concealed weapon. ♦ Indio resident arrested for burglary. ♦ Indio resident arrested for petty theft/ shoplifting. ♦ Indio, juvenile, resident arrested for petty theft/ shoplifting. ♦ Indio Hills resident arrested for DUI. ♦ Cathedral City resident arrested for DUI, drugs, causing a traffic collision. Noteworthy Accomplishments ♦ The Target Team utilized the patrol bikes for several days during the Christmas holiday shopping season, in order to deter any thefts or other problems occurring in the La Quinta business area parking lots. During this specialized patrol time, several theft incidents were handled or on -sited due to the Teams close range. Several vehicles were stored for excessive registration expiration problems and 25 citations were issued for various parking and vehicle code violations. ♦ The LQ Target Team and Palm Desert Target Team made several arrests during a joint search warranu! probation search operation. The arrests made included possession of drugs for sale, under the influence of drugs, parole and probation violations and possession of dangerous weapons. ♦ The Target Team attended a follow-up meeting in reference to the Crime Free Multi -Housing program being dratted for presentation to the City of La Quinta. ♦ The Target Team assisted patrol with calls for service and traffic problems. ♦ The Target Team, Traffic Team and the California Highway Patrol participated in a DUI informational checkpoint. Approx. (8) suspected intoxicated drivers who were tested, (11 of which was arrested for DUI. ♦ The Target Team arranged an informational display at the La Quinta Open House. The display consisted of informational handouts, recentiv acquired computer equipment, the K-y equipment and the patrol 'Dike equipment. 3�� CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT December 1999 LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy Stephen Morton (RSO Grant Funded Position) 7 Reports 6 Arrests 6 Citations 1 Pedestrian Checks 4 Cases filed with the District Attorney 3 Traffic Stops HIGHLIGHTS: One arrest was for truancy, two arrests were for battery on school grounds, two arrests were for vandalism to school property, and one arrest was for possession of marijuana on school grounds (approximately one gram). I spoke to the eighth grade class about laws concerning sex crimes and sexual harassment on school campus. I coordinated the "Bikes for Kids" program for the Variety Club of the Desert. Twenty-nine students from schools in the Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts received bicycles for their good grades and outstanding citizenship. Actual reporting period covers November 19, 1999 through December 17, 1999 SROs attend patrol briefings, participate in investigations with juvenile suspects, and attend the numerous school -related committee meetings. Their knowledge of student activities and characteristics is invaluable to police efforts in juvenile crime prevention and apprehension. 3(7 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT DECEMBER 1999* LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy Randall Wedertz School Resource Officer 12 Reports 4 Arrest 4 Citations 5 Traffic Stops 8 Pedestrian Checks 3 DA filings HIGHLIGHTS: Attended 24 hour drug abuse recognition course at the Palm Springs Police Training Center. Filed case with District Attorney's office, reference student threatening school employee. Took a report of a burglary to school employee's vehicle, briefcase taken, no suspects in incident. Issued citations to four students for truancy, returned students back to school. Arrested four students for fighting on campus. All four students were taken to the Indio Station where they were released to their parents. Report taken for vandalism occurring at the high school, unknown subjects spray painted buildings, walls, etc. -- approximately $400.00 dollars in damage. DEP. R. WEDERTZ #2346 "Actual reporting period covers November 19, 1999 through December 17, 1999 w CITY OF LA QUINTA NOVEMBER CRIME COMPARISONS CR jME NOVEMBER 99 NOVEMBER 98 YTD (99) YTD (98) *HOMICIDE 1 0 2 2 *RAPE 2 1 8 15 SEX CRIMES L 0 1 18 17 SEX CRIMES SD 3 3 14 18 ROBBERY 1 0 1S 13 ASSAULT (FEL) 8 13 91 103 ASSAULT ISD 13 17 198 172 BURGLARY 34 35 324 360 *VEHICLE THEFT 4 11 84 88 *THEFT (FEL) 16 9 149 124 THEFT MISD 31 20 287 275 VANDALISM ISD 44 30 383 260 DOM. VIOLENCE 5 26 105 132 NARCOTICS 6 8 98 58 DUI 5 5 70 99 T/C NON -INJURY 32 38 360 335 T/C INJURY 2 4 40 53 T/C FATAL 0 0 1 0 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 201 250 2687 2742 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 380 z W Q z CL o L1J � a W ° U U LU U Ory ^ W LL m W 0 Z z C� Q J � M co N N T- O tf) O LL LL W F- A W H m LL H J Q N N a W cc to ir xU W N W 38-. c rL w U. w oli 2 0 m LL J 4 a w m m N w UX W U w a I O O O 0 0 0 �' M N z 0 F- D m w F- U) 0 W CU a) LU �M W L W 0 Z Q J LL W H = N 38 z Q o co N N T- O �A O w w O w c9 a U W J LLI O O x N F7 384 P'la w W U F-- W `d' N O 00 CO d' N CO J Q U a E 3� rn zW m W � W � o � z LL. U Q^ � w w 0 o WJ U J o 0 Z � o Q a H � z ° U w 0 0 O Q ~ J w r CO co CO F— O 00 0) 0) 0 0 38US z w Q LL LL Q U W < 0 ~ O W 0 UU) cr- 0 a a o Q W z CO w D 'o Cy z Q J O LO O � O L O M N N I- T- z U H Z Z z Z O U U LL LL 9 H 3 8 ,' Presented by: Department Report 10-A City of La Qu"inta Fire Department Quarterly Report Doug McKain Battalion Chief 3fi? James M. Wright Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside County and the cities of: Beaumont rr Banning Calimesa .; Canyon Lake Coachella Desert Hot Springs 4. Indian Wells Indio Lake Elsinore La Quinta Moreno Valley Palm Desert r,. Perris 4• Rancho Mirage San Jacinto 4. Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Tom Mullen, District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department gfForestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (909) 94046900 • FAX (909) 940-691 O January 6, 2000 Honorable Mayor Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Ref: Quarterly Report Attached please find the Quarterly Report of Fire Department statistics for the City of La Quinta for October 1 through December 31, 1999. The report depicts the following highlights: Riverside County Fire Department units responded to a total of: Attachments • Medical Aids • False Alarms • Building Fires • Vegetation Fires • Automatic Ringing False Alarm • Other Fires (vehicle, refuse, etc.) • Public Service Assists (non -emergency assistance) • Fire Menace Standby (fuel spill, gas leak etc.) 229 16 8 0 35 16 18 G1 Respectfully submitted, James M. Wright Fire Chief Battal on Chief 383 October 27, 1999 October 26, 1999 La Quinta City Fire Department Major Incidents Responses Multiple Palm Tree fires La Quinta Country Club Golf Course Medical Aid Washington and Ave. 50 Construction Accident - Worker fallen into hole December 3, 1999 Vehicle Fire Ave. 53 and Madison Total Loss to vehicle December 10, 1999 Structure Fire 52000 Block of Eisenhower Dr. Bedroom fire and contents LOSS $10, 000.00 SAVED $100, 000.00 November 11, 1999 Medical Aid Skydiver down Dune Palms and Westward Ho 250 200 150 100 50 Ell La Quinta City Fire Responses Yearly Totals Yearly Comparisons ❑ 1999 ■ 1998 co C 'a EL Q LL Q N U 3 � LL U 2 N � N L LL U_ 0 U cu A � LL UO cy Q a)(n ' n c M cmcu o ca E(n o' 1999 1998 Medical Aids 229 222 False Alarms 16 7 Structure Fire 8 14 Vegetation Fires 0 0 Ringing Alarms 35 56 Other Fires 16 19 Public Service Assists 18 10 Fire Menace Standby 6 7 TOTALS 328 335 1/6/00 11J V . La Quinta City Quarterly Report Volunteer Responses Month Responses on Responses Medical i Costs Sleep -Over Costs October-99 105 56 $ 362.32 $ 30.00 November-99 137 34 $ 428.25 $ 90.00 December-99 109 67 $ 539.00 1 $ 150.00 TOTALSI 351 1 157 1 $ 1,329.57 $ 270.00 Medical Aid Costs Sleep -Ovens Costs TOTALS COSTS PERCENTAGES M October-99 ■ November-99 0 December-99 ■ October-99 ■ November-99 O December-99 0 Medical Aid ■ Sleep -Over 3� 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Quarterly Totals Quarterly Totals m U) vca Q fC E w Q CU U- i� m .5 ''-W^ Y J a U- C o m cm ccU- Q cm c a L M N Q Q� C ca co cQ U_ a N LL ® October-99 ■ November-99 0 December-99 October-99 November-99 December-99 Medical Aids 72 83 74 False Alarms 4 5 7 Structure Fire- 1 2 5 Vegetation Fires 0 0 0 Ringing Alarms 7 20 8 Other Fires 2 9 5 Public Service Assists 2 10 6 Fire Menace Standby 1 3 2 TOTALSI 89 1 132 1 107 0 33 W 70 50 40 30 20 10 9 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown IN Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Other Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Public Service Assists ■ Fire Menace Standby October-99 October-99 Medical Aids 72 False Alarms 4 Structure Fire 1 Vegetation Fires 2 Ringing Alarms 7 Other Fires 2 Public Service Assists 2 Fire Menace Standby 1 331Y 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown M Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Other Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ■ Public Service Assists ■ Fire Menace Standby November-99 November-99 Medical Aids 83 False Alarms 5 Structure Fire 2 Vegetation Fires 9 Ringing Alarms 20 Other Fires 9 Public Service Assists 10 Fire Menace Standby 3 39 ) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 La Quinta City Fire Responses Monthly Breakdown ® Medical Aids ■ False Alarms ❑ Structure Fire ❑ Other Fires ■ Ringing Alarms ® Public Service Assists ■ Fire Menace Standby December-99 December-99 Medical Aids 83 False Alarms 5 Structure Fire 2 Vegetation Fires 9 Ringing Alarms 20 Other Fires 9 Public Service Assists 10 Fire Menace Standby 3 La Quinta AYSO Region 443 Actual / Projected number of players Partial Short Sided 1999/2000 - Actual Division 1,2,3 63 Division 4 98 Division 5 113 Division 6 148 Division 7 70 Girls 35 36 90 72 37 Total 98 134 203 220 107 �l%lB�M 18-Jan-00 All Short Sided 2002/03 - Projected Boys Girls Total 95 53 148 150 54 204 173 138 311 225 109 334 107 56 163 Total Players 492 270 762 750 410 1160 La Quinta AYSO Region 443 Actual / Projected number of teams Partial Short Sided All Short Sided 1999/2000 - Actual 2002/03 - Projected Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Division 1,2,3 5 2 7 7 4 11 Division 4 8 4 12 14 5 19 Division 5 10 8 18 19 15 34 Division 6 16 8 24 32 16 48 Division 7 14 8 22 21 11 32 Total Teams 53 30 83 93 51 144 La Quinta AYSO 18-Jan-00 Soccer Field / Team Statistics Current Field Information Projected Field Information (2000/01) Current Team Players Future Team Players Field Size Size per Team Field Size Size per Team Division 1,2,3 100 x 60 11 v 11 14 110 x 70 11 v 11 14 Division 4 106 x 55 11 v 11 14 90 x 45 9 v 9 11 Division 5 100 x 55 9 v 9 11 80 x 40 7 v 7 9 Division 6 60 x 35 7 v 7 9 50 x 25 5 v 5 7 Division 7 30 x 15 3 v 3 5 30 x 15 3 v 3 5 La Quinta AYSO Number of Fields Required Actual Projected 1999/2000 2002/03 Division 1,2,3 1 1 Division 4 1 2 Division 5 1 3 Division 6 2 3 Division 7 3 4 8 12 All the above fields need lights. SOCCER - AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORG. NSTC Page 1 of 2 Tuesday, January 18, 2000 Everyone Plays • Balanced Teams • Open Registration • Positive Coaching • Good Sportsmanship Links Short -sided Games--> AYSOWorld Index MEMBERWorld Index Resource Index education ayso.org volunteerservices (a aysoorg Midwest Office Pala i �nnrn Airheads Candy "all" Laundry Detergent First USA FoxSportsWorld Networks Gatorade Metrocall Nutella Peosi Random House Publ. SCORE Spalding SunnyDelight CORPORATESPONSOR Dannon Water Kwik Goal Outdoor Products World's Finest Chocolate WHAT IS SHORT -SIDED SOCCER? Short -sided soccer is about what is best for young soccer players. It's for AYSO coaches, referees, administrators, spectators, and anyone else concerned with the development of 5 to 12 year old soccer players. WHY SHORT -SIDED SOCCER? Because young players need special consideration. Little research or attention has been given this critical period in the development of the under-12 year old players, but most educators agree the early learning experiences are the most important and result in the result in the most retention. Traditionally, youth soccer programs are viewed from an adult perspective, using the 11-a-side game as a reference. But we need to remember these important points about young players: ■ Children must be treated as children, not as mini -adults. ■ Children are essentially self -oriented and only relate naturally to a friend or two, not to grougs of six or more. ■ Children cannot sustain prolonged activity and function best with frequent rest periods. ■ Children have a limited span of attention, so frequent activity changes are necessary. ■ Children focus best when learning activities are fun. Almost 70 percent of AYSO coaches are first-time coaches -parents with little free time. Short -sided soccer is a way to ease adults into coaching as well as to ease children into playing. Be creative and remember, children play games to have fun. Short -sided games help ensure children have fun and at the same time, maximize their learning opportunities. InPlay Article on short -sided games, Click here GUIDELINES: • U-6 SHORT -SIDED GUIDELINES 393 http://www.soccer.org/resource/shortgam.htm 01/18/2000 SOCCER - AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORG. NSTC Page 2 of 2 • U-8 SHORT -SIDED GUIDELINES • U-10 SHORT -SIDED GUIDELINES • U-12 SHORT -SIDED GUIDELINES TOP American Youth Soccer Organization • National Support & Training Center Hawthorne, California, USA 1-800-USA-AYSO Copyright 1999 All Rights Reserved TERMS OF USE • CONTOCT US 330 http://www.soccer.org/resource/shortgam.htm 01/18/2000 T4ht 44vQ" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Public Hearing to Consider Adopting Proposals and Authorizing the City Manager to Submit Applications to Riverside County Economic Development Agency for Community Development Block Grant Funds for FY 2000-2001 ellyli ITAW I I' •� AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: I Adopt a Resolution of the City Council allocating the use of CDBG funds totaling an estimated $124,000, for FY 2000-2001 to the Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta Unit for the Fee Waiver/Reduction Program ($30,000), and to the City of La Quinta for public facility improvements, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Americans with Disabilities (ADA) handicap ramps improvements on Desert Club ($94,000) within Redevelopment Project Area 1. Upon approval by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (H.U.D.) of the County of Riverside "Urban County CDBG" monies, the City will be eligible for approximately $124,000 in funds for the project(s) identified in the Resolution and application submittals. None. The CDBG program is an important source of special program funding for the City of La Quinta. The CDBG program is administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). Each year funding is available from EDA to participating cities in the County for eligible activities. Eligible activities must meet national objectives which include benefits to low and moderate income families; the elderly or handicapped; or aid in the elimination of slums or blight. There are seventeen specific project categories that are eligible for funding (Attachment 1). Public services is one of the specific project categories eligible for CDBG funding. The list includes child care, recreation programs, and education programs, among others. All public service activities must show benefit to low and moderate income persons. The percent of CDBG funds allowed each year for these activities are limited by formula. The maximum allowable dollar amount this year is $30,000 for La Quinta. The City proposes to allocate the maximum allowable dollar amount ($30,000) for public service activities to the Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley, La Quinta Unit, to continue the Membership Fee Waiver/ Reduction Program. The program provides a fee waiver/reduction for certified low and moderate income families, living in La Quinta, to utilize day care and after school care services provided by the Boys and Girls Club in La Quinta. An estimated amount of $94,000 is requested to be allocated to the City to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA handicap ramps improvements on Desert Club Drive. Last year, the City Council approved this CDBG project as a multi -year project. The project meets the national objective of eliminating slums or blight. The project meets the criteria for eligibility of eliminating slum or blighting influences as documented in the City Redevelopment Plan Project Area 1. The project also meets the criteria for the handicap benefit category for handicap persons by providing ADA approved sidewalk handicap ramps. This category identifies physically challenged persons among specified groups presumed to be low and moderate income persons. The purpose of this hearing is to review and comment on all proposals, to take public comment, to select and identify proposals, and to reprogram funds if appropriate. The Council's final decision on the use of funds must be reached at the close .of tonight's public hearing in order to meet EDA and HUD submittal deadlines. The City will submit "Entitlement Funds Project Application Forms" to EDA. EDA submits, for all participating cities in the CDBG Urban County program, a "Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and projected Use of Funds" to HUD for final approval of CDBG funds for FY 2000-2001 . The City received one citizen suggestion (Attachment 2) to allocate the monies for bus stop shelter improvements. The City received the following grant applications for funding and copies of the requests are available in the City Clerk's Office: -;•"V AIM14REV • Agency Amount Purpose City of La Quinta $94,000 Public Facility Improvement; curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA handicap ramps improvements on Desert Club. 40 u02 PUBLIC SERVICE REQUESTS: Agency Amount > Purpose La Quinta Clients Proposed to Serve' Desert Aids Project $11,000 Comprehensive In -Home 22 care and case management Boys & Girls Club $30,000 Fee Waiver/Reduction 136 La Quinta Unit Program Community Access $7,500 Housing Referral Services: Disabled La Center Housing and self advocacy Quinta residents training FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council allocating the use of CDBG funds totaling an estimated $124,000, for FY 2000-2001 to the Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta Unit for the Fee Waiver/Reduction Program ($30,000), and to the City of La Quinta for public facility improvements, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk, and Americans with Disabilities (ADA) handicap ramps improvements on Desert Club ($94,000) within Redevelopment Project Area 1; or 2. Approve funding alternative eligible requests submitted; or 3. Provide staff with alternativ(3 direction. Respectfully submitted, rry Hekman immunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 40 , uu3 1 . Eligibility Activity Categories RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING PROPOSALS, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Funds for FY 2000- 2001 will be approximately $124,000 to begin July 1,2000; and, WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta must submit to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency project applications; and, WHEREAS, a public notice was published on December 17, 1999, announcing the availability of funds, requesting proposals, and public hearing dates; and, WHEREAS, the merits of all proposals were openly discussed and considered; and, WHEREAS, by a majority vote of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, the following proposal(s), or reprogramming(s), were selected: PROJECT th�14E SPONSOR AMOUNT 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta as follows: That the City of La Quinta does hereby select the above named project(s) or reprogramming(s), Community Development Block Grant funds. 2. That the City Council hereby directs the City Manager to prepare and submit the designated applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency in a timely fashion proposing the named activities and use of funds. 3. If there is a shortfall in funding, the City Council directs the City Manager to request the County to increase the City's public service cap in order to fully fund public service approved applications. 40v 004 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 1 8th day of January, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 404 vU ATTACHMENT # 1 1. Acquisition 2. Disposition 3. Public Facilities and Improvements 4. Privately -Owned Utilities 5.. Clearance 6. Public Services 7. Interim Assistance 8. Relocation 9. Loss of Rental Income 10. Removal of Architectural Barriers 11. Housing Rehabilitation 12. New Housing Construction 13. Code Enforcement 14. Historic Preservation 15. Commercial or Industrial Rehabilitation 16. Special Economic Development 17. Special Activities by Subrecipients CCM.uo v07 ATTACHMENT 2 UeceA. 18, 1999 P aurNT RECEIVED DEC 2 0 1999 w T 0. 15oa 2. e ,.", & . 92253 D". Q&-m, �n aao�wriae t . & at!f t.. aecei Qe F.Paoa.Pn. J . & cD a j n, .t f $130,000.o0, ° & '-� L4 cait. aL4tr J..&L"' at, a. aa ca& &4.t X.1t A..fa"aaec�� aeaX j iiaAe .,,.,„od'," ,,& Wff $aL,& niXiru� a� tL Tuia at um &ail ", aria doze J..& L Ljk..Aj 1a. p axea a a ir►ctiue %a. canaaewxian an. di,4 ma t.'m J " mj a,Q. ca. Q a."nek. wea — kw,4?azCea 4 &44 dW4.,J iayi & 4"' 4 ana in need f G,91 " & +QeaAei 4mer &- c 79740 OLA,,a 21 Odors, Cam.. u 0 8 T4ht °F 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 A Joint Public Hearing Between the City Council and Redevelopment Agency to Approve an Agreement to Sell Real Property Located at 53-495 Avenida Herrera by and between Corrine Gutierrez and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: pZ Approve the Agreement to sell the property located at 53-495 Avenida Herrera by and between Corrine Gutierrez and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency maintaining an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $85,000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Agreement would result in the following fiscal impacts: Resale Proceeds. The Agency will receive approximately $48,650 in cash proceeds from this transaction generated by the new mortgage loan and down payment less closing costs. A new second trust deed of $34,450 will be placed on the property in favor of the Agency. Property Rehabilitation Costs. None. All property rehabilitation costs have been funded by rent revenue. BACKGROUND: In August, 1995, the Agency acquired 50 single family homes as a result of the bankruptcy of Coachella Valley Land to protect the Agency's investment in the homes, to prevent a pending foreclosure action, and to maintain the units as very low income rental units. The Agency cost to acquire the 50 housing units averaged $86,500 per unit. On February 17, 1998, the Agency authorized the sale of up to two (2) units per year and directed staff to first make the units available to the existing tenants and then to other eligible very low income households. Because many of the tenants are now receiving work training as a requirement of their State and County assistance, their CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-2CC rpt for property sale.wpd 4 0 9 economic situation is improving. The proposed sale is the third unit to be sold to an existing tenant. The sale of this property will result in recorded covenants to insure the property will remain affordable to a very low income household for thirty (30) years. Property Resale. The sale transaction would be structured as other Agency affordable housing projects, wherein the existing Agency -funded silent second trust deed would cover the difference between the market sales price and an affordable first trust deed mortgage. The proposed purchaser qualifies in the very low income category. If the Agency authorizes the sale of this unit for the market value of $85,000, the buyer will make a down payment of 3% of the purchase price and obtain a $48,000 mortgage (the maximum loan she can obtain). The Agency would convert $34,450 of its existing equity in the property into a second trust deed loan. Prior to the sale, this unit will have been substantially rehabilitated and therefore, can be counted toward the Agency's inclusionary housing requirement. A Summary Report is attached (Attachment 1) as required by State Law. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an Agreement to sell the property located at 53-495 Avenida Herrera by and between Corrine Gutierrez and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency maintaining an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $85,000; or 2. Deny the request to approve an Agreement to sell the property located at 53- 495 Avenida Herrera by and between Corrine Gutierrez and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, rry Horman immunity Development Director Attachment: 1. Summary Report Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager 40'002 ATTACHMENT 1 SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CORRINE GUTIERREZ January 18, 2000 INTRODUCTION This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for a proposed property sale involving the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Corrine Gutierrez ("Buyer"). The purpose of the Sale Agreement ("Agreement") is to facilitate the sale by the Agency of a single-family dwelling to the Buyer. This Report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code ("California Community Redevelopment Law") and presents the following: A summary of the proposed transaction. The cost of the sale to the Agency. The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed, determined at the highest and best uses permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan. The estimated value to be conveyed, determined by the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the Agreement. An explanation of why the sale, pursuant to the Agreement, will assist in the elimination of blight. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property ("Property") is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath single-family dwelling located at 53-495 Avenida Herrera within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. THE TRANSACTIONS PROVIDED FOR BY THE AGREEMENT The Agreement will facilitate the sale of the Property to the Buyer, who will subsequently occupy the dwelling. The sales price is $85,000, comprised of approximately $2,550 in the Buyer's down payment, $48,000 from the Buyer's first trust deed mortgage, and $34,450 of the Agency's equity in the Property which will be converted into an affordable housing second trust deed loan. This second trust4 7 ,9 uU4 deed will include covenants to insure that the Property will remain affordable to a very low-income family for a minimum of 30 years. The monies required to fund the Agency's second trust deed were expended in August, 1995, when the Agency purchased this unit in order to secure its investment in an Affordable Housing Agreement with Coachella Valley Land. A portion of these purchase monies will be repaid to the Agency through the Buyer's down payment and first trust deed mortgage; the remaining funds will stay in place to fund the Agency's second trust deed mortgage and closing cost contribution. The Agency will receive approximately $48,650 from this transaction. History of Property This Property is currently a part of the Agency's Rental Property Purchase Program. In May, 1998, the Agency offered this Property to the Buyer who subsequently expressed an interest in purchasing the Property. Since that time, the Buyer has been approved by First Pacific Financial for a mortgage up to the amount of $48,000. The Buyer is a very low income household. The Cost of the Sale to the Agency The Agency will have approximately $107,750 invested in the Property through its cost to purchase the unit and to remedy deferred maintenance items which existed at the time of purchase. The sales contract provides for a purchase price of $85,000. Under this proposed transaction, the Agency's investment will be treated as follows: Agency Purchase Price: $ 86,500 Total Cost to Qualify Unit as Substantially Rehabilitated (funded from rent revenue): 21,250 Total Agency Investment: $107,750 Buyer Down Payment: $ 2,550 Buyer First Trust Deed Monies Paid to Agency: $ 48,000 Agency Affordable Housing Second Trust Deed: $ 34,450 Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed Determined at the Highest and Best Uses Permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 1 provides that the Property shall be used for low -density residential development. The Agency's consultant commissioned a real property appraisal to determine the current market value of a typical Agency owned rental property. The appraisal, dated April 13, 1999, indicated a current fair market value of $85,000. The Agency owned rental unit sold in August, 1999 was also appraised at a market value of $85,000. This value 41 coincides with other similarly sized units in the Cove. uu5 Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed. Determined at the Use With the Conditions. Covenants, and Development Costs Required by the Agreement The Agreement provides that the Property will be sold at the current market value of $85,000, which reflects the fair market value. Explanation of Why the Sale of the Property Pursuant to the Agreement will Assist in the Elimination of Blight The Agreement provides for the sale of the Property and the recordation of affordability covenants that will insure its continued affordability to a very low-income household for 30 years. Thus, the transaction will insure the continued affordability of a single-family dwelling -to a very low-income household. laquinta\lghp\rental housing\53-495 herrera summary report 4 1 t 1 .L U06