Loading...
2000 02 15 CCTiht 4 4 Q" CALL TO ORDER a. Pledge of Allegiance b. Roll Call Council Members: PUBLIC COMMENT City Council Agendas are now Available on the City's Web Page @ WWW.la-quinta. org City Council Agenda CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting February 15. 2000 - 2:00 P.M. Beginning Res. No. 2000-06 Ord. No. 340 Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CLOSED SESSION - None NOTE: TIME PERMITTING, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONDUCT CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSIONS DURING THE DINNER RECESS. ADDITIONALLY, PERSONS IDENTIFIED AS NEGOTIATING PARTIES WHERE THE CITY IS CONSIDERING ACQUISITION OF THEIR PROPERTY ARE NOT INVITED INTO THE CLOSED SESSION MEETING. PUBLIC COMMENT - 3:00 PM This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 1, 2000. ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. LETTER FROM C.A.R.E. (CURTAILING ABUSES RELATED TO THE ELDERLY) PROGRAM REQUESTING A $1,000 SPONSORSHIP FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING SEMINAR - APRIL 4 AND 5, 2000. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar Items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 15, 2000. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999. 3. APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT TO USE THE FRITZ BURNS PARK RECREATION ROOM FOR SUMMER DAY CAMP. 4. APPROVAL OF SELECTION - "LIVING FOR YOUR 90'S" RECIPIENT. 5. ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT NO. 98-17, AVENUE 50 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF LANDSCAPE SECURITY ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT 23995-1, INCO HOMES. 7. ACCEPTANCE OF THREE GRANT DEEDS CONVEYING RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR AUTO CENTER WAY NORTH TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA - LA TORRE AND SOWELL. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 23773-4, CENTURY HOMES. 9. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE 10-FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RESERVED ADJACENT TO SPANISH HILLS LANE IN PGA WEST TRACT 28603-1, STREET VACATION NO. 2000-041. 10. APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENT (NO. 2) FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CONSULTING SERVICES. Page 2. *� 1 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY SAFETY MANAGER AND A CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ATTEND A TRAINING CLASS GIVEN BY THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, INC., COMMERCE, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 25-26, 2000. 12. ACCEPTANCE OF THE COVERED PARKING AT THE SENIOR CENTER, PROJECT 99-13, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS), A RESOLUTION PRELIMINARILY ADOPTING, CONFIRMING, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS TO IMPROVEMENTS IN PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS), AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION OF STAFF TO BID THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PHASE IV PROJECT. A. RESOLUTION ACTION B. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF KSL's REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIFY ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATION. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM THE PGA WEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO ELIMINATE A REQUIREMENT FOR AN EQUESTRIAN TRAIL ALONG MADISON STREET. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER OF INTENT TO SEEK ANNEXATION FROM THE VILLAGE AT THE PALMS, A GOLF/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WEST OF MONROE STREET AND SOUTH OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO WAIVE THE UNDER -GROUNDING OF UTILITY LINES FOR RANCHO LA QUINTA. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 6. CONSIDERATION OF PROTOTYPICAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DETAILS OF AMENITIES TO BE INSTALLED, PROJECT NO. 98-19, PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION Page 3. 513 7. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO INCREASE THE CITY MANAGER'S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDERS ON THE JEFFERSON STREET PROJECT, PHASE I (HIGHWAY 1 1 1 TO AVENUE 54) TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,000. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 8. CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE CIVIC CENTER ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 9. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 14, CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 10. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 338 A) READ BY TITLE ONLY AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 338 1 1 . SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 339 A) READ BY TITLE ONLY AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 339 I31tg1 1 . CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF FAIRWAY ADVERTISING'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S BILLBOARD REGULATIONS. 2. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL GOALS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 2. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (SNIFF) 3 C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (PERKINS) 4. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (SNIFF) 5. DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (HENDERSON) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES COMMITTEES 7. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (HENDERSON) 8. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORTS AIRLINE SERVICES COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 9 PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION 10. RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DESERT LIBRARY ZONE ADVISORY BOARD 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PENA) 13. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (PENA) 14. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF JANUARY 12, 2000 Page 4. C 15. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JANUARY 11, 2000 16. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FOR JANUARY 5, 2000 17. REPORT OF COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REGARDING POTENTIAL ANNEXATION INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS (VERBAL REPORT) DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. REPORT ON UPCOMING EVENTS 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2000 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2000 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2000 B. YOUTH JOB TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES REPORT 7. FINANCE DIRECTOR A. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999 8. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A. MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2000 9. POLICE CHIEF A. MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY 2000 10. BATTALION CHIEF - None MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION REGARDING PAYMENT OF CITY FEES/SERVICES WITH CREDIT CARD. (ADOLPH) RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PRESENTATIONS 1 . PRESENTATION OF ADAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ART AWARDS. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for a public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. Page 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO SELL REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 52-690 AVENIDA HERRERA BY AND BETWEEN ROSA MONTES AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27519 (ALISO DEL REY) TO ELIMINATE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRING A GOLF COURSE SCREENING ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DUNE PALMS ROAD AND 100 FEET SOUTH OF DESERT STREAM DIVE. APPLICANT: CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES. A. RESOLUTION ACTION 3. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389 RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENT IMPACT; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-064 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRE -ANNEXATION GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FROM COUNTY DESIGNATION 2b 92-5 UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 UNITS PER ACRE); ZONE CHANGE 99-092 RECOMMENDING A CHANGE FROM COUNTY DESIGNATION R-1-9000 TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; AND APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 379 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 117 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET. APPLICANT WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING. A. RESOLUTION ACTION B. WAIVE FURTHER READING AND INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE ADJOURNMENT Page 6. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of February 15, 2000 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce and at Stater Bros., 78-630 Highway 111, on Friday, February 11, 2000. DATED: February 11, 2000 a�7� ._s� JUNE S. GREEK, CMC/AAE City Clerk, City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICE The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. Page 7. C.A.R.E. PROORAM E73_ 520 fired Waring Drive 14 & � Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ph: 760-836-1606 * Fax: 760-836-1608 January 24, 2000 The Honorable John Pena Mayor City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear John: Thank you for your interest as a possible sponsor for our Law Enforcement Training Seminar. On April 4th and 5th, 2000 the C.A.R.E. Program, in partnership with our District Attorney's office and Adult Protective Services, will provide a 2 day P.O.S.T. training on elder abuse, with the main focus being investigation and prosecution. We expect about 250 attendees each day. With the unprecedented growth in senior communities in Riverside County, home to over 258,000 seniors, law enforcement agencies have become witness to the disturbing upward crime trend of abuse and exploitation of older adults. The National Center on Elder Abuse reports that elder abuse is one of the most under recognized and under reported crimes in the United States. Physical, financial, psychological and sexual elder abuse permeates all segments of Riverside County and do not discriminate among race, gender or social class. There is a great need to educate Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice agencies, senior service providers, volunteers and the senior community on "Best Practices" when identifying reporting, investigating and prosecuting elder abuse cases. We have invited several speakers throughout the state of California to come and speak at our conference. They are the leading experts in their respective areas. We need your help to cover the cost for each speaker. We are asking for $1,000.00. Curtailing Abuses Related to the Elderly As a major sponsor you will get a full page ad in the conference work book and be recognized as the sponsor of a particular workshop. We will also put up banners at the conference and the reception. If you would like to discuss other opportunities please call me at (760) 836-1606. I look forward to discussing this with you further. I have also included information about our program. 009 oo-1 Tiht 4 w'*P Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated February 15, 2000 RECOMMENDATION. - BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 39944 - 399491 39950 - 39976) 39977 - 399811 39982 - 39984) 39985 - 398961 Auto Mall Cks1 Wire Transfers) P/R 4469 - 45461 P/R Tax Transfers) Payable Warrants: 39997 - 401231 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City Approve Demand Register Dated February 15, 2000 yohnFalconer, Finance Director 8,662.50 3,827.59 44,058.56 3,387.70 20,461.25 136,210.48 95,992.12 90,906.47 24,490.26 1,849,168.57 $2,277,165.50 $714,047,26 CITY DEMANDS RDA DEMANDS AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR % STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING $714,047.26 1,563,1 18.24 $2,277,165.50 O10 CITY OF LA QUINTA AUTO MALL BANK ACCOUNT TRANSACTIONS 12/1/99 - 1/26/00 CHECK # 2/2/00 1018 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT $136,210.48 TOTAL TRANSACTIONS $136,210A8 Oil 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 1 /27/00 - 2/9/00 2/4/00 WIRE TRANSFER - DEFERRED COMP 2/4/00 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 2/4/00 WIRE TRANSFER - CREDIT UNION 2/4/00 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW, 217/00 WIRE TRANSFER - RDA ESCROW TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $7,106.32 $13,386.48 $6,074.32 $24,825.00 $44,600.00 $95,992.12 012 K ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:28AM 02/09/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 39997 02/09/00 &00732 CALIFORNIA POOLS/SPAS INC 40.00 39998 02/09/00 &00996 JANET BARLOW 3.00 39999 02/09/00 &00997 LUIS BUELNA 35.00 40000 02/09/00 &00998 JOSE DE LA ROSA 35.00 40001 02/09/00 &00999 FAMILY POOL CONSTRUCTION 50.00 40002 02/09/00 &01000 GERARDO MELGOZA 35.00 40003 02/09/00 &01001 JOY SEEMATTER 50.00 40004 02/09/00 &01002 JUDY HARTSON 117.00 40005 02/09/00 &01003 SABBY JONATHAN 35.00 40006 02/09/00 &01004 PAULS AIR COND & HEATING 50.00 40007 02/09/00 &01005 SUN VISTA DEVELOPMENT 1000.00 40008 02/09/00 &01006 TOLL BROTHERS INC 1500.00 40009 02/09/00 &01007 ROBERTO REYES 58.50 40010 02/09/00 ACE010 ACE HARDWARE 1144.46 40011 02/09/00 ALCO50 BOB ALCALA 133.00 40012 02/09/00 ALEX10 STEVE ALEXANDER 1050.00 40013 02/09/00 AME160 AMERICAN DEMOGRAPHICS 99.00 40014 02/09/00 AME200 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SVCS 194.10 40015 02/09/00 AND050 ANDY'S AUTO REPAIR 745.80 40016 02/09/00 ASCO01 A & S COFFEE SERVICE 368.00 40017 02/09/00 ATC010 ATCO MANUFACTURING CO 716.85 40018 02/09/00 ATT075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 807.79 40019 02/09/00 AUT030 AUTOMATED TELECOM 409.11 40020 02/09/00 BAL150 ART BALLOY 966.00 40021 02/09/00 BEI050 R BEIN, W FROST & ASSOC 101338.87 40022 02/09/00 BES100 BEST BUY CO INC 107.73 40023 02/09/00 BOG100 SHARON BOGAN 189.00 40024 02/09/00 CAD010 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 440.52 40025 02/09/00 CAL080 CA SOC MUNCIPAL FINANCE 240.00 40026 02/09/00 CAT100 CATELLUS RESIDENTIAL 45765.12 40027 02/09/00 CEN010 CENTURY FORMS INC 112.07 40028 02/09/00 CLA030 GEORGIA CLARKE 260.40 40029 02/09/00 COA060 COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO 118872.45 40030 02/09/00 COA075 COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 332087.50 40031 02/09/00 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 207.18 40032 02/09/00 COA083 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 301872.46 40033 02/09/00 COL040 COLOR OPTIC LITERATURE 274.95 40034 02/09/00 COM007 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP 1307.01 40035 02/09/00 COM015 COMPUTER U LEARNING CENTR 1087.50 40036 02/09/00 C00050 J P COOKE CO, THE 67.10 40037 02/09/00 COS050 COSTCO BUSINESS DELIVERY 895.24 40038 02/09/00 CPR100 CPRS DISTRICT X 6.00 40039 02/09/00 CRA050 DANIEL CRAWFORD JR 118.25 40040 02/09/00 DES013 DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 109033.10 40041 02/09/00 DES018 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 412.14 40042 02/09/00 DES051 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHL 524828.98 40043 02/09/00 DES065 DESERT TEMPS INC 5222.30 013 H ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:28AM 02/09/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 2 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT 40044 02/09/00 DIE020 D HERNANDEZ DBA DIEGO'S 250.00 40045 02/09/00 DOU010 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HR PHOTO 10.37 40046 02/09/00 DRU100 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP 436.63 40047 02/09/00 EAG100 EAGLE/HOUSEHOLD BANK FSB 67.75 40048 02/09/00 EIS010 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 90.00 40049 02/09/00 EQUO10 DALE EQUITZ 15.00 40050 02/09/00 FIS050 FISHER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 64.65 40051 02/09/00 GRA010 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 479.01 40052 02/09/00 GUM050 BRAD GUMMER 598.50 40053 02/09/00 HER065 ADAN HERNANDEZ 650.00 40054 02/09/00 HOA010 HUGH HOARD INC 65.00 40055 02/09/00 HOL030 HOLMES & NARVER INC 32316.20 40056 02/09/00 HOM030 HOME DEPOT 756.22 40057 02/09/00 H00050 FAYE HOOPER 75.00 40058 02/09/00 IMPO10 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 5681.20 40059 02/09/00 IND030 INDIO SHOE STORE INC 147.56 40060 02/09/00 INL200 INLAND POWER EQUIPMENT CO 95.10 40061 02/09/00 INT014 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF 100.00 40062 02/09/00 JOB020 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 231.84 40063 02/09/00 KEL010 KELLY SERVICES INC 1970.64 40064 02/09/00 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 15893.47 40065 02/09/00 KIV100 KEIKO KIVRIZIS 114.80 40066 02/09/00 KSL053 KSL DEVELOPMENT CORP 63000.00 40067 02/09/00 KUL050 KULI IMAGE INC 232.65 40068 02/09/00 LAQ040 LA QUINTA CHAMBER COMMERC 150.00 40069 02/09/00 LIN050 JAMES LINDSEY 299.84 40070 02/09/00 L00010 LOCK SHOP INC 28.21 40071 02/09/00 LOS050 LOS ANGELES TIMES 33.12 40072 02/09/00 LUC050 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES 529.44 40073 02/09/00 LUN050 LUNDEEN PACIFIC CORP 32216.33 40074 02/09/00 MAU050 BRIAN MAURER PHOTOGRAPHY 393.28 40075 02/09/00 MCDO10 MC DOWELL AWARDS 106.68 40076 02/09/00 MCK010 McKESSON WATER PRODUCTS 223.45 40077 02/09/00 MED100 MEDIA GRAPHICS INTERNATL 9.90 40078 02/09/00 MOM100 MOM'S GAS STATION 766.75 40079 02/09/00 MUN010 MUNI FINANCIAL SERV INC 77.00 40080 02/09/00 NAD100 JACK NADEL INC 685.84 40081 02/09/00 NEX010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2078.41 40082 02/09/00 NIC100 NICKERSON, DIERCKS & ASSC 5100.00 40083 02/09/00 OLI100 OLINN MESSAGE CENTER 79.34 40084 02/09/00 PUB050 THE PUBLIC RECORD 52.00 40085 02/09/00 PUT100 JOE PUTRINO GENERAL CONT 24995.00 40086 02/09/00 RAS020 RASA - ERIC NELSON 990.00 40087 02/09/00 RIV083 RIV CNTY INFORMATION 420.00 40088 02/09/00 RIV120 RIV COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT 59319.59 40089 02/09/00 RIV150 RIV COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 1142.29 40090 02/09/00 RIV351 RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO 15.00 40091 02/09/00 ROB100 ROBINS NEST FLORAL EXPRES 60.88 40092 02/09/00 ROS010 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 20038.14 014 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:28AM 02/09/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER 40093 40094 40095 40096 40097 40098 40099 40100 40101 40102 40103 40104 40105 40106 40107 40108 40109 40110 40111 40112 40113 40114 40115 40116 40117 40118 40119 40120 40121 40122 40123 CHECK DATE 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 02/09/00 NO. SAL050 SAN035 SAX100 SHAO10 SMAO10 SMO010 SOUO.07 SOU010 SPE010 SPRO10 STA045 STA050 STA150 SZE100 TKDO10 TOP010 TRA020 TRA200 TRU010 TTI100 ULT100 ULT150 USC100 USO100 VER050 WAL010 WES010 WIN010 WIS020 XER010 YOU100 VENDOR NAME DAVID SALES SAN DIEGO PARADISE POINT SAXON ENGINEERING SERVICE SHADOW PALMS GARDENING SMART & FINAL DONNALDA SMOLENS SOUTHWEST NETWORKS, INC SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO STEVE SPEER SPRINT STAN'S AUTO TECH STAPLES STATER BROS SHARON SZESNY T.K.D. ASSOCIATES INC TOPS'N BARRICADES INC TRANSAMERICA INTELLITECH STEVEN TRAXEL TRULY NOLEN INC TTI NATIONAL INC ULTIMATE INTERNET ACC INC ULTRA -RESEARCH U.S. COMMUNICATIONS US OFFICE PRODUCTS FREDRICO VERDUGO WAL MART STORES INC WEST PUBLISHING CORP WINSTON TIRES WISE MAINTENANCE & CONST XEROX CORPORATION YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT 25.00 460.98 2310.00 150.00 357.41 336.25 2916.56 380.89 129.92 608.12 248.04 661.88 132.14 324.80 236.25 784.96 140.74 150.00 294.00 8.13 20.00 15.00 2495.71 810.99 25.00 184.62 355.54 1765.75 450.00 1366.83 3482.50 1,849,168.57 015 � Z O O \ C. C. N O 0 a 7 0 m m O W H O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O RC m F F F F E F. F E H E. F H a N O O O O O O O O O O O O m E. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z F Z O O In In O In O In O O O U H O O O fY a 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o w µal o Z F F O E. E O O W H H H H W H O O O O I'+ w U a a w a w a a w a w a a �a w i w �a a �a a - a FFo z a W [Q� a w 2 W a� W Z [Q� ❑ 2 pF pF pF pF Vm� pE vm� pF pE E m W u El O E m o F O O F U O E m o F U O E IS a F 4 a F U O o oy H o. a m a g m a g m a o m a m S a o m x U g a U g a m a m g a g m ❑ a 8 a z H u ❑ W ❑ n w ❑ 9 w ❑ n ❑ w W ❑ ❑ w ❑ w ❑ ❑ w W w w> w> u. w > w> W w> W w> w w> W w W w W w> W w> W m ❑ W m W a a a a a m a lz m {L o w w r o o a w o 0 > z > m i n 10 O H n o O 10 i n H ❑ H H O Z O O In '+ In .'+ OI m - H N r1 V - N In H H O O O In O ❑ •t ri n N n n r1 .� O V H z 7 Pr m W m a O O w F a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ao m w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n a m z H O d ID N ID N 10 N 'S n '7 l0 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 U U t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U H O Z m H F H U7 W 0� m W m E o m m a O Z z a H m O N ❑ g o a a a o wwF o 0 o w W H 4 z 8 In z W ?gE� O a H 4 O m rEF h st M O >+ p w m N qO W 5C m > w yF o ¢ 4 O w O a 4 0 O m w zZ U h a h w [9 h h In a toEl F Z O > N 10 r Q` 0) O O >. r a, 0) O of O O 0• 0+ O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O U F O O O O V H It u O a O a O a O a O a O a O a O a O a O la O 1 fi w r m 01 0 - N - d 0 10 r m ON O 10 ti .-� ti .•� ti .-� .-1 .-1 N N N N N N N E.z 0 0 rn 0 \ N N o w u H m o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 d 0 m o U' aM a m N E N E H N F N H N F N F H N H N F H N E N F N F N F N H N F N F N F H N H H F N F H N E N F N O .-i O� .+ 0• r N O O m O O O U1 O 0. E E �(1 .'t d N d N .'1 m N /'t r'1 r O d �11 O O m .•� r O �'1 d .-1 O O 5 O O �D r O O /'1 O F •-+ d r d l0 to d m �' r d 1(t N N r N N .-� m �' r w m o N d r'1 0 � w o o lo o O 1t d O o m v o d O w 4 a FOa EO2�� w H .4 F a H C) nF a u a n m vl m m m m w m m m m m w m m m m m a o o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w o L) o a u C.1 z cm z O z . a ,r a .. a a a . a .; a .+ a a a .a a .141, a a a .a a a a a a z �' w �' w a w w a a w a w a m w w w w w a w w a w O W a O O 7 O 7 O O O O a O a O w O O m 2 qa I11 fL V] m v! VI y w O m V1 m m U) y y vl VJ V) m V) V1 w w m m N m m V) V7 m m �+ H W W C� W O W H 0 .Z H m N m N r N .+ N �n Y1 r rl O r N lO n N r N n r lO D1 O1 1p l0 N r r r V1 1p d m O O O m O m m m Q� O O+ O� m 4• a, O 0 0 O o O O O1 m m o O O a �D �O �D �O �D �O �O �D �0 - ui ui vi lO in a a m w m a o0 W F a o O n O r r r r r r r o r n r r r o r o o o o o N o W m O o O o N m O o ^! m -1 m e m v m .a m d m d m o o m w N m N m m m m w O o m w o o o 0 O 0 o 0 o o 0+ u O o E r+ o 0 m m n z o 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o ri 'L O M V .'1 .•1 t .'1 d' rt O C O n �f r1 Y r r r r r N O O .r� in in � in vi in ui vi .n v+ u� �n v� .n in in �n in in vi �n in O O U 6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 a w Ems+ a q3q q3q 3QQ 3 q3q p3Q p3Q q3q q3q q3q q3q 3 3 Q3Q 3 q3 q3q ❑3❑ Q3Q q3q 3qq q3q 3pp .,qyy' s m a O o u F u o wz _ > m O a r o o w U a o 0 w u w u a 0 0 w u w u a 0 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a O 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w v a 0 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a 0 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u w u a o 0 w u m O m o o u F m o w r� lO O m O N - - N - � - O - � - �g rl r 0 0 [sty: E 2 al m O S m Q m m m m m m m O W H O 0 O m O m O a O V O 0 O m O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O a F F F F F F F F F E E E E H H F E F F E r4 p O O ko m [.� F a Z O � 0 0 p m pl 0 o rn 0 v ID 0 m vi N r'1 o o m m m -t n m �O r .-+ N r m tD O O m r r• u1 N r O n m m v m W m m W m m m o m ` o a F pE Z .aa E a t F a a Fo Z O w Z O w Z o w Z 0 a Z 0 a Z o w Z o Z F 0 a El o El p w m w a H a.. > a S a 8 S a 8 W W o S 8 N z u m z w u m z w m W W W z w u H z w W w w w z W a iL a o. z W .] 0 .a 0 .a 0 .a 0 .7 0 .,] 0 .] o z a w a W u a W ❑ > _> i > w> O O> � � > W WWWW W W > W 4 W W w W i i > U U W m u U U u u u u U w u U W ❑ H a wm ^� r ri -� a m N O m N ri r N lD m O m N N m N N r m r m to w m �(1 to r v 1' r lr1 r I(1 l0 r d' m m .+ v O m Irl 10 v m 1!1 o m 0 O H ❑ ❑ H H z ul m Vl W Ul m V� m .-+ ry o O o n m � ul A O u'1 ID m r n� N r m r m ry in r In m r w m r (o m o o 0 N z Ft Z a ¢ m w m a ' o0 w E a W O O o a �o w e rl ID v ID io v ID m m d' � o m m O m m r a m r d m o IO m o 0 m O to m O 0 m O to m p to m� o 10 W w m o Lo m - ID m O Z V1 m O m O m O m O m m O n O [� 2 to N IO to O W 10 r r r r ut �O Ul �O w 1!1 o Ul �D VI o Vl to ul to ul m �rl IO �(1 - � Q U O V O. 0 N O N t[t r.l t/1 r'1 O i(t itl .-i irl .-1 i[t •} V .-� �tl .--I � .-I .-1 .-I .-1 .-1 .1 P1 Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W U W U > m W U > m W u > m W u > m W W O u O u W W U W W u W W u W W U m W U m w u W W U m W u o C> a si 0 o 0 0 0 0 Fd o H a U >> a U a z H z H H a w H a w H a w H a w H a w H a w H a w H a w E O E o °� o z_ z z z a W W w W a s €�+ m W m W m m m m m m m m W W m W u- s O O W W u u W W W W W w W ca {a�.37 E ( (a77 E a; W H H ❑ 'i Q w ❑❑❑❑ a w a w a w m Q w w L) c.. w O a w a w a r a cwy a r a a r a u� (❑Wj �❑Ir•1 c o a U w a w w W _ W m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 O .1. a t P4 Q zd a a w a W a w a W N ❑ a s O u O u H o E a H a F o H a E a F a F a n H �z o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n n v r v n n u 0 0 7 Q +. U2 to Wg O N O N O N O N �fl yO O O 4 O O Q .+ O 4 .-+ O 6 r Ho r HO ES r O 4 r HO ES r HO EZ r HO Es r O a r O 4 rn O m O U d Q .4 Ac 9 Z Z m H ON O m O r N 0 O 01 N O W < � N ((J� H 4 W O E. O N H O H F O N F O N E O N F O N H O N H O N E O N F O N E O N F O N' F O N E O N H O N F O N E O N F O N F O O N N E E O Z E �D O O O O n m n n O O . O O O O O lD O O [� i Q z 7 10 r lD 40 O• r 0 O o H m H 0 r N ID 0 O d d 1D N Vt N 0 o r m r O O N O O N m w al d 10 (71 E. m o Cl)E o m w r T O O E G a o z ° O F a W w W w° F a a F 2 W m .u+ O Z> w H a u w u Q a O ❑ z u O aa a o ❑ z �-, -Z z 0 ', -Z z 0z a O z - a o ❑ z �+ u 5 a a m o ❑ z o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m o m o ❑ z u 0 800 a Q z H m w a W W E m W J H m H m pi > U W > E m w w w H w H w H w H w H w H w H w H w H w H w H w H W > W .0 ; > iL m W W ❑ W A z H W ❑ W O N Z M .H.. O Z O Z O Z O - a Z > Z > 2 > Z O Z O Z 5 Z > Z > Ll � fi u w ❑ 7 Z '> Z a v u+ rID N 0 N N r iD r N H m O H N n 0 r r 0 n r 0 w N .-+ lD N - m H m - m H m r 0 w m H m r 0 '+ d %D H ❑ H ❑ Q a H z r- r r+ .� O1 0 .+ D• o 0)d ui .+ N H 0 ..+ m o m o d .+ -y .-+ ip .-. 1D ..+ tD H m 0 - .+ m O - m O .+ m w m m 0 0 E. E a W N N O N O o N O O o 0 O 0 O 0 O O O o O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O o O O O O O O ID m s 5 Z [� N 10 Cl O ID O ID O 0 H O r m O kD O r ID O r l0 O n W O r- ID O r ID O r O r O r O r ID O r W O r �D O r W O r 0 O ID n rn 0 0 ID `y U u H Ifl r1 Ill N m m ID m m ID O ? N 0 N 1f1 O N 1f1 r't I I(1 rl m Ifl d d ID d - I(1 d d 1(1 d - Iff d d m d - Ill - r m - r I - I(1 r1 d - O m \D u Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 u 0 !.L Da w 0, W 04 W >4 a OW >4 a. W a w .a M a a .a D. w z `a H H 0 O u O m a > m a n m M 7 m a O m D. 0 m a 0 m a O m D. f7 m D. O m D. O m a D m a O m w F z .7 W❑ aa, Q a a a w w w 0 u xd c� 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w 0 w m u w a W E Z Q ❑ 0 a 3 30 m m OO' H ��7� H H H n s H �� H . �H nH 5H �H zVV Mw m cn F F F F F F F H 9F H 9F E 9F O .a7 Z O > O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U `E-+ Q u n o Q .� m o W m - 0 W m o w m o O m 0q u H 0q u 0q u 0q u .. 0 u .+ 0 u 0 u .-+ 00q u o u .. 00 u .� 0 u .. 0 u .. 0 u m o 0 .+ u u 019 10 0 0 fwQ+' oz Ul 1I1 Ift N N '!1 1[1 1[1 r1 P1 r'1 n m N o W O � N x U H a4 pq m o N E m 0 N E m 0 N H r o "N F r N F r o N E d 0 N F d 0 N H m 0 N E m 0 N F m 0 N F n 0 N E n 0 N H d 0 N F d 0 N F d d 0 0 N N F F .ti 0 N •� O I0 0' m m m lD m O O r O .r O .+ m d O lD n d rl d n N N M (A T O .+ m r1 0 '+ rl N �. a Ul CJ O N r r m r o N r d r r o 2 z m a m .0 a C a w •t a w a¢ a w m .a .0 a 4 w a w s .4 E m a E+El 4 w m a w .0 o > w a w o a m o w w a o o u o >> a a o x ❑.l E a x F > a a o E u o o ❑ u u u u rn o o o o O > 4 o g z c c4 w❑ {❑a a¢ ai µ❑7 > vmi a > F a F a E a F a Wo CW-� > a w Q > ran µ07 > W > Z N w w ,.. O O O N d O O� U W ❑ p; �n o O n 0 0 O 10 0 0 O o 0 N r, .-� T ry O O r �t1 ID 0 o in fi ;L a: 7. z n �n O ID O ID 0 ID O .n r O u't 0. � U O d ui O ul a •t m w mrc 0 0 o o w E W r O a• O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 o r1 in r in n O in n O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 N O 4• 0 �n Z �-1 Lao, o+ 0 10 o r ti' ID C 0 O 1p o N N m 0 N N m 0 r, N m rt l0 n m kD 0 O � 0 O �O O 0 I0 N N" CO N m 0 O r u co m v 0 w O m I0 0 Q U m 10 O .�-� O N O O\ O O1 O D` O N O N M m lD m M tD u-� �0 O D• 0 0, O N ui d �n O d ry O O O O O O O 7 O d O V O rl O r1 O .-I O r1 O O rl �I �a 0 O a o 0 O w ❑ H w z a w a a w a a w a a w a a w a a w a s w rw d a u 0 o F u w E w o >• w 3 >4 w 3 r w 3 >1 w 3 >� w 3 >• w 3 �• w 3s >. w + 00 a rz+ W. ❑ w a aFZ �a a > s > a > a > a > a > a > a > a > s > .+ u 0 ago a w E+ m a❑ » a 0 a a w > a o u o .0 a w x a s w x c a w x a a w x Q a w x a a w x a a wa x .s a a¢ a w x s w x E- ll, O a u a a u a w o+ s a w 4 a a o g w E a u E z w u a o w cD u a o U u s 0 u U a 0 u u a 0 u u a 0 u u a¢< 0 u u 0 u u 0 u U d 0 u u •s 0 u 0 a 0 u 0 u 0 0 u Ow :J u H ¢ r� o O H u 0 z u 0 u 0 l0 O ¢ o u 0 l0 O a 0 v r O a 0 u o m O ¢¢ 0 v o m O 0 U O m O a 0 U o m O a 0 u o m O a 0 U M m O a 0 u n m O ¢ 0 u p d O a 0 u 00 v u u 020 d Ill l0 r m m O d .'-I d Ill d 1D d d d d 0 0 • Ill rn N N M N � rn ND O W w m U F m m o E. d 0 N F d 0 N F d 0 N F d o N E d O N F d 0 N E d O N H d 0 N F m 0 N E o N E. O N F 0 N F 0 0 N H O N H O N F 0 0 N N H F N CP O H z _F o .-I 1100 d d d .-+ r --1 N --1 d r^j DI 1100 m 0 d .-I � O r o to In m O n O .Ni d Ir(I 100 m � O o d d N 4 U 0 ��? 0 O Ill Nai 0 N INn co m O ID In O m 10 Z m .4 w a p O d N m d N Ln w a a a a a a w a w a w a a s H w a a s O F a s H W W w a C9 Hto O a s a U o z S u z W z Ca w a a w a a a a a w a a a a a❑ a z rn w z w o a u❑ .t z a s z w a z z �c a> a .+ s a a z z �✓ E. E. co w w w > ❑ ElO w > w O w O w O w O w w O w O w > W a O w > 6 a 2 .-I a u dd w u w to .2 a z z O O u u rJ p 2 a .-I O d O d O d O d O Ill O Ill O Ill O Ill I m O .-I I Ol Ol O Ol D1 d "1' H ❑ H p py44 w C N Z .'1 0) fn Ill 1D In Ill Ifl ul Ill Ill In Ill ID In I'1 I') Irl 0 Pt In f1 0 In 0 N ul d 0 ul O O O O d d ul vl W W m a o0 w H ^1 O O O O O d d a W O O O O O O N O m 0 0 O d m m O O 0 N O m d m m O O O O O O O In O O O O O O O O O O r1 n ul ul z O O O O O O O O O O 10 In ID N m O r .-I 0 m N m O 0 I[7 vl m O u u y vl 0 r-I 0 vl .-I r-I 0 In f-I 0 0 d .-i 0 Ill .d r-1 0 O �} .-I 0 Vl rl .-1 0 Ifl rl .-I 0 Vl .-I .-+ 0 Ill N 0 0 .-I 0 0 Ol 0 0 Vl Pl .� 0 Ill N 0 I!"I N 0 0 O Ol N 0 U1 I[1 0 d 0 0 0 0 a a u m a u w a u w � W a w O a W O a w O a W ❑ . a W ❑ a W ❑ a w ❑ a W ❑. a 17 a 0 U w a � m ❑ w ❑ w ❑ w z z z tall .y n .. w W 12-I w m twi7 IZi m n W Izi n I -I n m w Iz. m m w IZi w � w n X H ❑ 0µ, z p .U-1 a z O y4 z 0 0 w fn 11CW w H a Z a o Iy W W. O u m 0 u al m 0 u m m 0 u w m 0 u m m 0 u m m 0 u 5 m 0 u m 0 u n ❑ u a w U H a a W E a w H a cn fn F a H a E.F H+ a It ° a to a m w h E+ w 0 u H m 0 u El m 0 u H n 0 u H n 0 u H w 0 u E+ w 0 u E+ n 0 u a a 0 za ❑ w w ❑ w w ❑ w w ❑❑❑ w w w w w w w w ❑❑ J. [zy ✓1 0 II'1 0 r 0 Ill 0 I[1 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 V O O 0 Ill- ^1 m .--I I-+ Ill I( -� Ill Ill Ill ID 10 5 n r U H U au O 0 u O O O O O O O O O O O O uuu O O O O 0 s O O w ❑ Ow Ow wO Ow Ow ❑❑ 021 12 r m M 0 - N ;- N n V ID n In In 10 v Il1 ID ID ifl N r ID ID In m ID 0 0 Z d O < - I � lD W ID m 0 r N o W U E paq d o N E 0 N H a o N F a O N E+ v O N F d m o o N N E E m O N F m o N E m o N E a O N F m O N F d o N H m 0 N H d 0 N E. m o N H d' O N H m o N E ry o z o a o o o 71 N Il1 o 0 O 0 InID �D O m 'f ul ID m DI ID T m O In O 10 ID r a a O n O r O n n ID In r 0 O O O In ID N ry O O ID n r ID O DI H /r(7 ID N � N N a O w _ aso uC ao �] aoo aA a oa W a oao � 'Cl oa cA oao P� ID O a 0 H a 7 F F a E a F a F o Z sc a a z W ac N F v F u F u F u F v 9F F E uu ra in F rp u�4 El rp u� o w a $ In °❑ Z w a a °o w m 8 a w ao o z pm 8 E+ z w 8 F Z 5 m w w N w z 0 v z 0 U z 0 u E 2 0 u z 0 u E E z z 0 0 u u F `0 u H z o u > Z a U F > O x a E. > j m = > m w O u O E N a v O > ❑ H q > z N x w W L O Z N ul in c1' in N In in �7' In N In In d' In d In 7 In V a` in �1' vl V w d In ID '1' -.t In ul lD d' iD d In ID O ID d' In O m .• In ul ui O m .+ O In r N O n In n N O n r •-� D• DI O 0 D` OI f 11 ✓+ a Z a a m w m a 0 v O D- E, a -r n -> n - d •r n .r v n n .r n .. n u, .+ o O d n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o � n w pq jIn In in In In In In In In In ID o m o O O O ol m n m N1 z o In II'1 0 ul In 0 In 1l1 0 In 1l1 0 In In In 0 0 In In In 0 In Ul 0 Ili rn 0 lD n 0 r n 0 r n 0 r n 0 r Ifl 0 ID 0 ID 0 r 0 r ❑ Q O Ir+ In O In 0 In In O In In In O vi In I� ti O co w O x a of u ul 9.tm,. rn m W aj u ca U O O n ou ul (y Z M u Z N u z N U z N v z N v u z z N N U Z N v Z N ❑ 2 Q a N z U a cc 0 O InQ A O W ul N ❑ Can' I < w N a z P. z W &I 04 w E+ W x W E W F LL x w E+ Pa 0a x E w W E E W z w F 04 z w F N w ❑ z E Z P4 W g x W- m O 0 x m O 0 N a µ7 N E N Z m 5 z o u Z O a Q m a a m O ❑ a W m w a w m w a w rn W a w m w a w m w a a W w m m w w a w m w a W m w W x a w > o > a w w•] 0 w w .] 0 z W H W w x H �y 0 u n n n n u n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 y. u F v N a v W 0 m w ❑ ID 0 m W ❑ ID 0 m w ❑ ID 0 m w o l0 0 m w ❑ ID W 0 0 m m w w ❑ ❑ ID 0 m w ❑ lD 0 m W ❑ ry 0 w N ❑ 0 0 o ❑ 2 ❑ a ❑ -a o a w � o s w 0 m w 0 Ol w !n o w a a 0 022 13 O O Z r m In In m � O n r r n n In r r r r n m m m m m N o W ¢� U F ¢ c1 v IT O O N H H m O N E m O N ElH m o N m 0 N F m 0 N F m 0 N E. v o N m O N F m O N H m o N F m O H m O H m O N F m O N H m o N H ry m O (� `L H OID o O m .-1 O O o In 0 tD 0 ifl ID 0 r v In v m n ry r ID ry ID v o m Q 04 N V .•a O rn f- O In m m O O O vl O O In ID O N tD N N ID O O ul 0 N ID Ill n v a a In a a O O o O N o ID a a • c'7 H a a s E N rl a ¢ n a a E a a aso E to n u7 vl rn rn ID In a a E '+ a a waooG .". O > 7 a r-I a u x O q z E U u O 0 oG lz F a O 0 z r H a a r a a O Im z cr p Z 0 u F ac z [Ei O w H E a y O W 0 H z a m W H a a O p z F a u O o 0 M z u H x F u H x F U H a ��..rr U H x H u a E�-I u H a 0: z H z W �. a CL w > F+ E. Z N W > a r4 w > a W > m 0 w D. > 2 a W > H w Z > u U U u U w [wtyy W n H �`-� H U A'. N O m In rn O to O rn O rn O10 -f In Ill In In H p p H H X H Z m m Z D, D; m lD N O 0 N N -+ Ul N -+ ID a a > m a > W a > M a O 0 O 0 In 10 a z n. ¢ m w w rz 0 o w F (): N N m m Ill Ill O O O v v m O '+ rl In In N v W fp z In N m m O O ,DID ID b m O lD m O ID .•+ N ID m O ID m n O r m n O r irl m O ID O r N ID ID r N ID ID r N w ID w r N o In m O w In m O o m Pl O r m rl 0 r E+ 'y r1 ♦'t Vl In N Ill nl N Ill r't r to O r In tp Ill V' V Ul O N O N r1 In C' v Ifl v v In v 7 In v O Ill ID ID m ID In v In v UN a N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n rFi] rFn rF/) !Fn tFn O U u z q z o H q z 0 q z 0 q z 0 H O z 0 H O z o H z H a H [j H W F w H a a z W < W O Z la E�,, OW F� OW pa 8 [xp W w Ol pzim 0 0 a m w 0 q 0 q 0 w a E s E ac a i a o M z N' o CD o o In In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u E to N j O 0 W 0 O W O O 0 O O 0 O O O 0 O pO 8 O pOp,, S O O O 0 O 0 O z O ry z 023 14 G G O . O K <D m m O N 01 01 O O1 0 w w N CD F m o F 0 F 0 F 0 H 0 H 0 E. 0 0 N F r 0 N H r 0 N H r 0 N F r 0 N H r 0 N F m 0 N E 0 0 N F m 0 N E r 0 N F r 0 N E r 0 (V F C) O E. z F O ul O ut O to O in m 1D O O a � r � 0 0 to 0 rn m m a a o o o a U z v - n v 0 m ~ o F o F 3 vc m w o o O N w a o V] E IL a w E H wfn m x -+ . O .� u H w O O ID n N z Q H i pp \\ wW� S❑ c ocd� o a E+ pp H FF .7 E m pp H pp 0 o a 0- a w H H d w E 4 u a N O p m F H F E a H E pp z F O u z O w 0 > Z H a P4 U F a a m 0 w ❑ a z W a m v� a W a H m w a W a m m a❑ W F a o Z 2 O o Q U❑ d E a E o u z E a o ❑ z Fz 0 \\ 6 O a� 7 H H N U z 7 vJ F a z O M W z O❑ \ a o Z u u b❑ ppcc a o \❑ Z ww a 0 Z m m a❑ W a a o m -- z a O a m s O VJ W W H �n w w m > i m W i pC� W i \ w W i \ w > \ 0 d w > O U O1 w > a 5 V] a N m O U z Cw7 d w wW ❑ w ❑ D, U] w > H 2 H w F > W !L W > VuV O V1 {a7 > U w pW > z H p > z H {p g =� z u'1 m a` to m Ot H w O .-� 1D O m iO ri v a e D• r r �D O O x a ti m w m a o0 w F [G O O O O O N N N N N N N V1 O O 0 W m i O O lD O O 1D O O 1D O O 10 w O O v ID u'1 n o 0 to m O 0 1D x n v lD m O 0 1D m O 0 lD m n W lD m rt 1D W m 0 O 10 ul O 0 10 to 0 0 lD O o 0 r O r rt 1D O r rt 1D [�---II `L Q U N O m .h - O m 1D N O T uJ - O Q, tD - O .r N vl Q O H O H 1 O .ti O .--� N O Ot i O Ot 1N O .-1 O N 10 O r �D N O H O N U d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O W O 0 W U 0 Z m Z m H Z m H Z m Fd Z rn Fd Z rn F-1 Z ul a W a o a H U Z �>>> u a H U Z u a U Z u a H U Z u U z U z F a W > ❑❑❑❑ a F W > a H W > d F W > d E• w ^ o❑ d F W > d H W > q d O u E U a U s d d ¢ d `ad U w m w m w m w m w w m w N z E H m WZ .6-l1 Ed Ed Ed WH 8��83a Q � �u �u '.a+ O' c, til a' O pQ z zzzFd C z Z z d m O 17 N a OL a z 9L a �z a wz :L a wz a4 a wz CG a wz J4 a �z `.4 O ❑ a �4 H a O a O s 'n [ z Q 2 H H H H O O O pL O O O O O O oG O /'1 O H O r1 O 5 > Qu H U H d u o E+ `L H 0 F+ z H 0 H z H 0 E z H N 0 cG O h 0 a w ae O z H a4 O z H ac O z H b4 O z H x O z H x O z H w O z H 9 O > H D4 1fl 0 a to .4 ut 0 a w -f 0 a a O 0 a s 024 15 Z �p r m O •-+ N m O� n < O 01 v� N 10 N N N n n O O Z O O O N o w (� w U F Q m r o N F r o N E r O N E r r o 0 N N E E r o N F r O N F m o N F m 0 N F r 0 N E r 0 N F m o N H r e N E r o H r 0 N ElH r 0 N E r 0 r 0 N F ry p. o �a z O H O n O .-1 O O O •-1 .1 O O N n m N N n a a,T N n l0 •� m n O r m O. N r N 1D •J tD N d a O O O m O� N m •� n m � O. N ry ^ n n lD m N n m .D tD w z U O z = u Z n u Z n u u z Z 5 Q E. f Q [� O E m Q �+ O F Q Z E .9 H H 'L F F m 3 3 u O H E a a - v) a OO a a a y N O O O ,U!y�' W s0!�� S W 4 O W E C. S 5 WWW S w U nRa S Cpps S H DI a M m H aO S pHpffii ,YM,Y,, w w wo 3 E s ac > � > > m 0 a > a > O a > O H a H O H o 0 ❑ O > H O - H a w m O O 1 O O 0 - O m r Ih O) m ID �O rn O m 1d' N r O+ O n K 0 o ry m N 0 m N 0 m N v vi 01 m m n N O. H Gl H x `• a a m Z O �. O r, O •� O O ,..� ,� 0 � ,. ui o l0 vi n r r r n n w m 0 o0 w O O O O O O O, r 0 m O O O O O N m N m W m a y o O n Lo 0 O n tD O 0 n m 0 0 O O n n kD w 0 O It ID 0 0 d 10 a kO y ^+ m O O O o ID 0 In 0 0 0 ID 0 O .+ O r 0 O n O r 0 O r I ID H 0 O 0f r , (D n O r m n O r n O U d' CJ et n .-1 ID •f 1p d' rl LLl 7 r1 N n .-� U V' rJ •+ n N n .-1 n .-� .-i Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ,y O O a W g PG W m W a a VN 0) E. n o U m O m O m W O O m m �a] W H U U E y O O m O m a O m a W ,y m y u m u u m m m u u �+ W a• W u Z u i H F O a O z H a mm Q pq4 Q a 3 s 3 Q w E m H Q :D Q Z H Q z H Q Q Q z H 1-. 0 z .7 O z .7 a 00 m U) s 5 U) W a W u Z U F F 4 ,_, W m ate„ z W 3 o W Z O to U) z 0 N m Nu a Q a v) o e o a dd .7 a QQ .7 a rr�t .7 o a a rQ� QC .i .7 N �i m WWgg 4 h u O a u O s S O a L u 7 a w z o a Q iz m o u u u u u w O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t. C) H u Q u o a a 0 a a 0 a a 0 0 a a a a 0 z a 0 0 z s 0 8 a 0 8 s 0 m O a 0 u a 0 z a 0 Q F 0 o u XXX 0 0 u 0 o u 0 u u x 0 u u x 02.5 16 O O O Z. n N n O� n m D• !'1 O• V 0 m m r O m m D, O+ O O ..a - O N O n O v O ID n O -+ N o W O � y U F d m r O N F 0 N F 0 H m O N E r O N El m o N N m O N H 0 N ElE m O N m m o O N N H F m O N E m o N F m O tV El m O m O N H m o H m O N E m o N N M1 O N F N Z O �n vi vi O N N .+ O O O O O O O O O O v O W i Da Sz n � m n+ �D r N �O r O N r O r lD N O O N •'-' O n O .n•1 O n 0 .-1 O m N �n v O O ul r O o V m v O O V n n N C( a` m H r r 0N m 1Ud U H N FU-1 Ny lU-I H O U' W D• W O 1. 0 '+ w a > m U w U U w w U w U w y U w yHy U w yNy U w Zm U w U w Z iL H a a a ao oa r p d Z .p7 w .Fpa \ \ \ 0 \ 0 �\+ N \ 0 \ \ \ 0 \ aFp a .pa w U E+ 0.i 3 C7 E 04 x m m F 0: 4 y U F a E 0 F m O \ O a m E W F 44 a a E E E Z E z E E z H O a U E EE cc G. O H u m N J4 z O H z 5 w ad U W w O 2 w o: 00. O Z E Ol g z w F x F m O n O Z O z a E W h E u W w h E W r� Ox E+ W H U H w h Ow F W r� O� F W a H w O 4z] Hygo O Z u m m w w o a U w> O m m 5 m w u a 0. 404 0. 0a o, 04 a P. 06 W Q. W 6 m U w p O z w LID o T, m n D\ n r if1 cm)lD n 1 \ w 'D n \ tD n \ l0 n \ 'D n \ n \ n \ n \ N H p d C. 6 m H a z m m n m vi o D 0 D 1 r o 0 o m rn m o rn m rn r r W m 0 oO w E a ca m f 0 w m m n N m n N m -D iD 10 rn 0 O o 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 lD 10 0 O o 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 o O 0 N n 0 O 0 o n m 0 O o Z o U O n O .-1 N O N N u r 10 0 O O O rd in n O 'T n n m 0 m n m 0 0 0 a, m N n m r w 10 0 �D m 1D w 0 0 r r tD 0 �D r r- D O o rn m m lD 0 O m O m lD O w 0 n 0 0 m n u1 u3 0 �D n u'1 n r1 �D ID N 0 U d O .. O H O .+ O �r, Ifs r O .+ O .-+ O .� O v O O -r a H O •r O -t O -? O v O O O a O d' O .-� H O .� CID U a a z s s z fn w c of m a m vui m a¢ of vi EE) m o m m w H W Z o > W m z0FW E a u `n u m JWG m U u a x u x A4 u x 'n u x x u a m u x A4 u x w u x H w U 0 F m W FL 3 m U M m U fH .y n 2u2 U Z U N z W H o w w H H O 0 W H o w H p H O W H O W H 0 C] W H p w a Ell U PW4 W a z - 6 m 4 W W z o m Z ` o0 m m Z 0 m z 0 m Z 0 m 2 0 m 2 0 m 2 o m z O m H a m a It-- w d a m x o 0 z m m U I d o d o m f W z Z x u z x u a x A: u m x w u H x w u H 0: w u H P4 w u H a w u H a w u H m w u h-1 04 w u H z f7 0 a w z o ' 0 0 0 0 z 0 ti 0 n 0 0 z 0 z z 0 cl z o z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 o 0 0 O N U F U H o u U 0 w W 0 p W 0 f O .-. 0 Z z g o C z z Q z z W z U H z E.,� r.i H H 2 z U H z .Ui z H z U H z U H z U H z U H z H a o a 0 2t 17 n LD r m m m r '+ m m O '+ N n a Y1 1 r O O Z m O N N o W r„y g a x u F Q m CO o N F m 0 N F m 0 N E m 0 N H m 0 N E r o H r O N F m o N E. r o N r O (V E. r O N F r o HH r 0 r 0 N H r r r r 0 0 0 0 N N N H E EH N V O O O O O O O O O m m V1 '1I1 O O N O O O Z 10 .mod w .40-+ 0 1D ko r < O o O 0 O 0 O o in N O m o m N �n a W w d m m m w O m m eT ° F H mpp O O F z a 4 wlz C4 w F w „ a w Z z a a F U a w[ U a a a W a ¢ OO a -no s w mug a O a s aH sOO w ❑ a z a go m or� Q w Q �Z Z� ❑mO m❑O acL w F w H u u u wppa ❑ x 5 H a m z w m a u mw u mE a s u E E a O a a v m O ❑ W u m o �-+ a O m 0 o H W w x U z w x U z w x U z m O ❑ z w u C m m O ❑ z w M m O ❑ z W m H 0 ❑ w z w `> V1 m W fA r 0 O ❑ !] z a z '� m W w U' H w O H o Z H 2 z 3 0 0 0 w z Od Od W W ❑ > z w z> w w a a a a a> a F 4 > m> t E �' �' ?, [�/� Q 7 O O a 0 a a z y u w m d a W ❑ a W E+ O d m m W W a O � Z 0 Z w Pp f m � m .i, m .n-��.� m m i N U C, O ON a IO N m m UUUUUUUU W m m W m m W m m W m m m m m m m m W W W W n - Q m - H ❑ m a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a •t m W m m o w F m n u r1 n r u r- n r n '+ C. o o m O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 w z O z [� m O �D m O 10 m O �O m O ID m O 0 ID m O lD N m N tD O O O 0 O ID 0 O 10 O 0 10 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 'y O p 1n m \o N ON � N v C4 .f N .. r7 ,-, �} O m "r N N .-+ O 0 O m N 0 m n 0 m N O m 0 r lO 1 O O m O m m m m U rt O .T O V O .-1 O .+ O �a O ti O n O H O .+ O H K N O O ID O a Ul O C o 0 7 N N 7 O E- O Z °y O O H pk�mJ,� x 5 n a d z z z z o H W F z E+ a O a m a m a m a m o W z w W z w m a ' y a w N a m w w z W m z o a w J4 W U a �4 W U DG W U X w U J4 ac ac 9G W W W w u U U U O u 0 u z U U o 2 w F E. W W W H ,c ❑ 1Za ❑ N 5 H m H m H m H z >+ H z 0 0 W In W z w M w 3 o [L w 3 0 iL m 3 0 P. m 3 0 iL CL W O� m m m w 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 >. a a 4z o a WW ° s ° mmm u u u z C zo m m z0 z0 mmwmm z z z z ma v w p o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a u ON ON ON > m O a a 0 z OH z ON Z 0 O 0 O m s `a d d m m a a 027 m rn o N v u) ID r W m rn vi o �O N rD N to 0 0 E+ Z o W F o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N o 0 0 0 N N N N N fJ N N N N N N E N E N E N F N F N F N E. N E F F E F F N Y a m m o o m o O 0 o 0 o 0 O o o N O o .� ON n o O p `Z m m O O r0 O O r'1 7 � � O .D N l0 C N O N O � O n O vl .n � to O rl .� O (•1 C O m O O O O y �P N m o p u N o: o to 0 o r y0 oO En a a y W° z z z z z w a w u x ac a s m m m a n m v a o a w m m a a a a a > z 0 0 0 0 m 0 m A a o 3 a o u u u u o 18 .- H o rye; a� S y n y 5 w U > w > w z > z z z w > w w3 w a > W W f+yi > > o G;i Leii Lei 0 u a 1 5 5 w a > z z $ f5 m w w z z z z z m a a m m m m m m m UUU u W ❑ to m r- N �f1 O W O m ti Z �, ❑ �+ Z S u Z W u W u w U w u w O o O o O O O O m d' r m to r m to v o o o o O O N N N ❑ z ¢ z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ¢ w w a , 0 o O w E., a w w o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o rn m .n o o o r a .n r e v, r v u, r v m m o o o o o o u, m N M �n N m in .. o.+ o o o to o to o 'o m o to n o w 1 o to o w O. o l0 r I ID in o w .n o w .n o O in o to .ti ry W - o r r3 o r O o r O o to rn o w a,- a,z o o o ID r to C O U O (r m o 0. m G O N r'1 r'1 .'t r'1 V' N N m a vl <r a c to a r Y ul e .-i o .. 0 8 0 .-1 0 - 0 ..-i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W W ryzz -i H r+ 0 N a a a o vi W :4 w G4 W JL w x w rO+ ❑ z z •• z •-� H m z m z n� u u u u u da m w a w a w a w U a a a w a w s 3 F w Eu ¢¢¢ w > w m ¢ a z z z z a� 7 z ¢ z o o E wu w z z w F m m m O U 0 z O z c z 0 z � a " w ., w w m ¢¢ m F H F m m m .y+ r OOd 3 z 3 z 3 O 3 z 3 z m W w W w w O w .d .a ❑ ❑ 3W 3 ¢ a .s a o w m w m `w m w m w m ❑ > > ❑ z z o z o `o, Z o HPP o 0 0 0 o Ua °a 5 2 a m g❑ m' a a & o u¢i m m rn m m rn m m to m m O o o o o o o o o o 0 o O o 0 o r r r o U u o 0 .-. 0 .� 0 .-. 0 o o o o '+ 0 '+ 0 .-+ 0 .-+ o o 0 o _. 0 0 o o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ u m a m m a m m o m m m m m m m m m EOM v) 028 10 r m m r m o .•-I N r+ �f O, l0 r m M O o N z O GN GN 0 N 0 w U F r o r o r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 m 0 m 0 r 0 n O r 0 n 0 r 0 m 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r o r O r o m 0 r 0 (,7 Q N N N N N rJ N (V rJ rJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N d m E H E E+ E H F E F E. E+ E+ E+ F F F E+ E E E E. H H a N u1 O O lD O u1 rn O N m O m t0 ui l0 O Olo r d orn F rn F �T l0 r -r o N r'1 N m O D1 o m D1 N %D lD 1 ID O m m N N m a O a o m Q a ID m N N d m 1n m m O m o lD O cn m m W D1 m0 lD L . N O WmW 3 F H W E+ H O U 0 0� 3 0 0 -4 a a a m z .a �d m u, w w w a a a a d FH Q Q d a M z H ta� W W D, aL m E OO F F OF F 2 �-+ D+ a x w F a m [z m P4 m a m a m C H a C ex U > u > a a s D; m w w w w w m u1 w u In Oa �+ m P6 W W H W F W E4 W F 41 H O p u > u > 0 a w 0 O p m 0 O W p a W s W " O 0 w H w H w H w . w M w .ti w N w H 0 O w M u F O o 0 0 5 z m co z Q z w w z u u u z a a a 0 a a .a a z a rn o z a 0 a� s 0 0 a� t 0 n� 0 a m d w a z o m z o x . �' x w x w x w 04 D. u> D. w D. 13 0 W w 5 D. u. 0 w m 0 a a 0 w a 0 w 0. 0 m w u u u u >>> m m m m m m m m In w v. p a m m WlD ID ID 1n .n v, .n In o l0 o 1n 7 > > W m m O m O N O N O r O r O r cv 1[t N .�-i O cl m m rn m m m m m N Z % O O O O O O 0 O N 0f m l0 r I n D'• N r -a - , m w -� " -J N O N' r N Z O O O O O O N co m �T O O 0 l0 N 4 N N N N N N O 0 O p N N N N N N o O O '.-1 m .-� .+ --I lD .-+ .-1 .-� .�-� -J .� N 1 �L Q Z a a m w m o: o0 w o o 0 o o m m m o o o o o o o 0 o w m m o to o lD m o to 0 lD o o o o o o o co o <r lD a lD r lD o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ol 1f1 Ifl m D1 m rl I -d .-1 -J - .-+ n Z O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O r l0 ID r lD lD lD lD to lD l0 ID ID ID ID to lD to r r r r r r r n r- [� `y 1n v1 ui ul .rl v1 O u1 v1 in o o O o u1 vl 1(1 N O O to O O . .ti . -+ U d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U U U U U U 0 0 _ u u w ul a a 0 0 " " per, 3o3 303 303 30 E"z wz wz E"z 2 Q (Y O O O vl w p H H F E E F u u w = a ' m m w m Fr. >• o 3� r m m - m w w a w w a w a w a w w a w w a w a w a w w It a q 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 E+ 0404 E. F E E w w w w w w w w f+ w z m r7 u? v) v7 u1 Mu) u1 w v7 WWW w u) v) w V1 u) v) u1 v) O r r r r r o 0 O o o N m o o O o 0 0 0 o O a O ?• o O o O O O O O o O o O O O O O O a O 0 O -Ito O o O O o o O O o O o o O o O o O v1 U N U 5 O 0 O o O O O o> O O >> O O W W a4 a a4 D. a H d H Q F Q F a H d F Q F a F Q H Q H Q H C F a u m m uJ m m m cn to m m EG y m m m m m W m m to m 029 20 0 0 z~ m m � .N-I m m m m m N Ol Ol Ol Ol cmi In N O W U• g a U H a m r O fV F r O F H m O N F m O N F r O N E r o N E. r O N r O N F r O- N E m o N H r O N E. r O N F _ r O N F r O N H N of O [ti Z H z K 1D K m O K O 0 w m 0 n 1p 0 Vl r o O r m O N O Ill .'-I r Vl 01 M N m d � 0 � n N K N O In ID r K o 0 c O n O o O .+ rc �r io N O 2 .r ao U z� F Ul In D. In rI W v1 z E E F F a F w [+ E a °a a a a a a °a H z o u vi E z ° F m U H W Q > z �+ a u u a 8 z W U paL F s 8 z W w x U Z a m g w " z m W D. a O ❑ z W 7a � O 0 D: a w Q ❑ z W x Q ❑ z W z Q U E. z Q U H z Q U F o U F 8 8 z � z W a W z w w 8 z W u L) N 8 z 8 z w " m 4. U) w w ❑ > m> z a� a, > a> ul m F>> w x w a w w D. w w a m w a w> w au a> w z> > H u m U p Q C W On n K Ol ri N n .n K O m K m O m m O O n lD K O K N .-i K ul Ol lD Ol O f: ❑ H "� z In o O n D+ O 0 .i n 1 .� In - O In O In . O O r n R( 3 61 ID n In 4 .+ O ❑ t4 a z D. a m w m a Q O W F K O O n n n n o lD O O O O D• .+ 0 0 w m x a Z Ol ul O O ID In .n a` O W m n O r O Ol 0 lD O n ID w O lD ID O ID w O W w O W ID ^1 0 O O ID O vl ID m O r O O r [� z O Q n In N In n In .ti In K In r In " ill n In N O n vl n ul n O Ill In ti O U r( O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 x U z o U 7 rn F U 7 vl F a a W z u z u z" U z 2 U U a El z rn z O H rn F s w In w N o m N a a4 t u x z w a z z w s z z w .4 z z w .4 z z O F z F �d w u[..)7 a4 z o O a w `w a a Q a O o o Z 04 m w w ai N an N F n F F z ,Fa .a " m 5 w O N z o �zy > n 0 H 0 F 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 Q >. u d u w W U) O F O o F O.-4 E a`� F a E. m H m E. a H " > a > ru» 0 0 030 21 m O d O m O z 0 0 a, rn o 10 � N O W U H r O r O r O r O r O r O r O r O m O m O m O m O m O r O r O r O m 0 m 0 r 0 m 0 m 0 m o m O m O t.7 Q a m N E N H N E N E N H N E N F N F N F N E N E N F N H N H N H N F N E N F N H N F N F N H N E N F w N l ID lD Ol O N r In m d N hl n r O � d d Ol lD d d N �O ID Ill O m O lD n ul O Vl ill 01 r In O O � H z O Ol r N m !' r r• lD f N r N r ifl O H m N n H In Ill N Ol In N r O ID O O I'1 ill O d - m O In >r a m o N d In m o �D In r O In N d m ill In Vl lD M Q H � w 3 to Q w a. n n n to0 m m � m a O m E n to a > n a E a a O > u w H w H w H w M m W m w � W n W w H w H w H w H w H O ❑ a w H w H o ❑ a O ❑ g O H z H U t4 - w a CL 1 a w w 6. D. 6. W w 6. w 0. W W U w 0 a 0 w 0 In a 0 o. 0 w 0 w 0 w %� w 0 w 0n a a> 0 8> o a a H a 0 a> 0 m> w a H a H a H a> H n �n n n Inn n rn n In io n n w w n n 3 E H E H �+ w w U W ❑ a m ID ry m o ID N m In O 0 n O r m m i11 N r'1 fP N N N H O lD m N /"1 rn N r N ID O, 7. • (i zE H W 2` O a n s lD O Q O > a �'1 > a If1 > a In > Q r > a fJ > a Q` a f > s Ol > Q rn > a O N O N r T t- T O m In N In N I11 N II'1 N In H Z O O O O ul QI O O ❑ H tL O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m d -? N O 0 0 O N a �a Q1 w m a O O w H a W o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O .+ O O m m 0 O N N 0 O 0 O 0 O rn d rn d m d rn d o O fp O O O O O O O O O O O m O Inm O mn On 0 H H H .-a .� H .� H H .-� .-� n '+ ti m rn rn m Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In H H H r r r H r H r r r H r r r r ti r r lD r r- r` r lD 10 H w wID H H m m O Q O N In d O N in d In .J In d ul d In H u1 m ul n vl .'1 In H In R r1 In N 0 H N In N o N N O N O N O In O In On In In r In n U V H a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H 0 0 H - H H .,+ .. .. .. ..+ .. .. ., H E n Z O U U U U ww PL U �, o to E+ n F n E n H rn EE m F n E+ n E m E+ n E n E+ to H n E Z H H H O U la o V u U u V U u u V U U u u O w ❑o °o ❑o °o ❑o ❑o ❑o °o ❑o °O ❑o �a z o o o to rn to to a m W W W W W W d W W W W W w In �1a w F > In w a w u W U w u W u w u w U w u w u W U W u w u W u w u O E E F E a w E H H F CQ H H H M H H H H H H H H H H V Q'i a z z z z s a w w w w w w w w rw < D a m 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O ❑ w a a a as E n m z n z m z m z w n .J n pz n 0 n 0 n 0 n 5 n 0_ m m 0 n 0 m 0 m 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 a w Q 3 a 3 Q 3 3 ww 3 H 3 H 3 H 3 H 3 H 3 > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O '+ O O O O O O O O O �+ O O O O O O O O O O O u H rJ O n O con O O n O n O n O O n O O O to O 0 m a r� n Z Z z z n Q u 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 W > Q 3 IJ; 3 3 3 W 3 M 3 H 3 M 3 H 3 H 3 031 22 io O r O m O ~ z� 0 O O� O r ry o w V H r o r 0 r 0 4 m F F F a � ry O r o Z E � in m l0 a � o n o m • K � F F z w Fpp a pHo H Z. fIW� pE M K E W E Q a F a a p z 0 7 a o x a❑ u❑ H y W H H W zz W O n n O V U 7 W ❑ w w U w cc l d ❑ a r r O o `ro O> E m w z H ❑ '" o m z O co 00 OE H x a z a d m w m a O ow E w W o l0 O to K 5 cl O z O O O lo ID m o U U ^� 4 O o O W V a W r z z C7 O O z 0. P� w 0 o z a W F m O u U u z z w a s c x u m ' zz z p > o o 0 o o o 0 o H W W O a u x X 3`9 10 2 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 10:32AM 02/04/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39985 02/04/00 ABE001 JAQUES ABELS 150.00 39986 02/04/00 BOB100 BILL BOBBITT 50.00 39987 02/04/00 BUT010 RICHARD BUTLER 150.00 39988 02/04/00 CUN100 DENNIS CUNNINGHAM 50.00 39989 02/04/00 KIR010 TOM KIRK 150.00 39990 02/04/00 MIT150 MICHAEL MITCHELL 50.00 39991 02/04/00 PUE050 MARIA L PUENTE 50.00 39992 02/04/00 REY055 FRANK R. REYNOLDS P.E. 50.00 39993 02/04/00 ROB150 STEVE ROBBINS 150.00 39994 02/04/00 TYL050 ROBERT T TYLER 150.00 39995 02/04/00 WIS020 WISE MAINTENANCE & CONST 19411.25 39996 02/04/00 WRI050 ROBERT S WRIGHT 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 20,461.25 033 24 H C' F 0 o W T H m .WU�W. E W£W E WiW H W�W F W�W H WW E EEW F W�W F WE�7 F WEµ1 F WEµ7 F �i�77 F a a N o 0 0 u 0 0 o c 0 c u 0 0 o 0 a o 0 a O 0 o 0 o o m N c, o a W w ul co v E Fa" Op E pu FO HC o F pu F w O Ep+ F as H w HO Hp E O F E O U pH E p O u F W cc a P FO a F F w u > z .n cz O a •+ 0 w F O z O G H p w O N O t� �+ z 0 �"' O 0 5 0 z w H O m ., {Ea H 8 H z z O H O z Z pa H 8 z z F a wM a O 8 x 0 z z E' `� > u w z> u> H > H a z x Q a 0 ¢ 0 a 0 0 m 0 0 s 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 - H n > wm O N Z < o 2 0 ry 0 Q 0 Q 0 z h 0 ry z h 0 h 0 N yy 0 N h 0 N z h y a a `¢ m w m m O O w a o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O r r o o 0 0 o O o m 0 m 0 rn 0 rn o n m rn z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o+ F W a rn z 0 U n a 5 H Z q a 7 rn x W y m o; F H n a ¢ C m m m a U F F a w a w m a m m a N H W L a s o a i ? c a W n m a 3 o a � ti w a n w p O G O •-- Il1 (1 fl I(1 l(1 N Vl L H 4 u W ¢ m pm m u (z ec F S w a W im O a N H N 3 pHpc� 3 03425 0 3' 2 S ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 11:26AM 02/03/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR PAYMENT NUMBER DATE NO. NAME AMOUNT ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39982 02/03/00 AEP010 AEP 39983 02/03/00 BUI041 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOC 39984 02/03/00 GTE010 GTE CALIFORNIA CHECK TOTAL 190.00 29.00 3168.70 3,387.70 036 27 O !'l U � N U W T H d � N n. O O O O O r a o rn m O Z O a w w w O Z q m N m OD .Zi a C9 Z W F W Z 2 Z W W m .. w_ o e c> W L ID m Z > Z i D rn O O n io ID z a d m w m a 0 O W H a O rJ 0 0 n w o 0 r vi vi v+ 10 D H Z ry O U U C O O O O O U O a in H O z yy 0 a 0 O a c c u c`ti a n, cg a c ^ w w N "' Cw Q ai Hw C7 7 O �z7 > O O O O O p o � O o F 0 0 C U 6 m C9 F C9 EW^ C7 1� V 3"1 28 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 09:49AM 02/03/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39977 02/03/00 CAL040 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE 39978 02/03/00 CAN050 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO 39979 02/03/00 DES067 DESERT VALLEY ALL STAR 39980 02/03/00 PRI050 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 39981 02/03/00 TRA030 TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE CHECK TOTAL PAYMENT AMOUNT 1149.38 511.13 1000.00 41345.17 52.88 44,058.56 038 20 J H Z O 0 0 O j 2 H F H F F F 4 a rn o rn O L� .y N N Ifl f, m T O fJ � F o O Wri RW W t E z a z pp OM ElF y H El ElE W N F E a C7 Z Z H Z E+ Z a m a u a o a o a a❑ > a z o -a In x a o u w W w F1. w E w 'a w .z+ W❑ > > > r«F7 N ,Wi W W ❑ a u y o 4 O Wm L� z rn rn r r � ❑ O Y z Z O ti a .0 m w m a o F 0 a W c o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F Z C p O O O O O O O O O U O O N O O O U '-1 .a W U O U W U w u F o z a a mu� Mn W YZ-1 2 > w a .f H w E Q Q a a > El w a If. 1. 7 (v O El �L ❑ - a U U rn - W Z H w t o .-77 zaz a Ixrn a zw U U o a w E-F w0 0 > n_ o r o 0 C y O O O O U w a a F, 2 U U U ❑ W w F a a m I 039 30 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER 2:47PM 02/01/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** PAYMENT AMOUNT 39950 02/01/00 BECO10 DEBORAH BECHARD 50.00 39951 02/01/00 BLA060 JAN BLAKELY 50.00 39952 02/01/00 CIR010 CIRO'S RESTORANTE 149.28 39953 02/01/00 COA080 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 39.08 39954 02/01/00 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 346.94 39955 02/01/00 HEN010 MICHELLE HENSON 50.00 39956 02/01/00 HUL010 KATHRYN HULL 50.00 39957 02/01/00 INT005 INTERNAL REVENUE SVC-ACS 200.00 39958 02/01/00 IRWO10 JOSEPH IRWIN 50.00 39959 02/01/00 LAQ050 LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES 377.00 39960 02/01/00 LAQ065 LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOC 750.00 39961 02/01/00 LEW010 TOM LEWIS 50.00 39962 02/01/00 MAH100 CYRILLE P MAHFOUD 50.00 39963 02/01/00 MCM210 LESLIE MCMILLAN 50.00 39964 02/01/00 MOU100 DONALD J MOULIN 50.00 3.9965 02/01/00 OLA100 MILTON OLANDER 50.00 39966 02/01/00 OSBO50 LEE M OSBORNE CPA 50.00 39967 02/01/00 PED010 KATHRYN PEDERSEN-NADLER 50.00 39968 02/01/00 PET005 CASH/PETTY CASH 396.79 39969 02/01/00 RAS060 JACKIE RASMUSSEN 50.00 39970 02/01/00 REB050 JOAN REBICH 50.00 39971 02/01/00 REY050 ELAINE REYNOLDS 50.00 39972 02/01/00 RIV040 RIV CNTY DISTRICT ATTORNY 426.50 39973 02/01/00 SHA040 ROSITA SHAMIS 50.00 39974 02/01/00 STJO10 VICTORIA ST JOHNS 50.00 39975 02/01/00 SUP100 SUPPORT PAYMENT CLEARING- 150.00 39976 02/01/00 UNIO05 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 142.00 CHECK TOTAL 3,827.59 0 4b 31 0 0 z 10 10 N m N w x Wu a w F. U Qm [aU'7 H (�C,Ja7]7 H [CaJ77 E µU'77 F (�C�777 F (Uy'7 H (Ca'71 E {tU'j F La. F {�s7 E 0) O E � F F .a 0 z 0 O o in o O 0 ul m N of C m O o+ ri v O r to o O vi m 0 O o O 0 O 0 O o vi 0 O 0 0 O 0 o 0 O o �n 0 O r r 0 O o In p - •-1 N N �') M1 C7 0 O O Z E o O O m N o m O o El d 01 to O Z o O O 0 O O z m H m 0 O Oo 4 m a 0 0 O O O r d U O z > .�oi F o EFp., El z z m m m m m g Ea o� v p W u CT Epo p aa4 E HF O a m » F p E a g Q a F s izi ❑ pN p F a a u > F m F m F m E m pHp F a pE F a pH� pF F Zak tJ o F Zµ11 Ft z H • F M Z7 o Z ❑ W > Z O W > W F W > 9 O R O 1 O O W > W > { a > u m > rn µ W > a > a m w w N p O a w u o o u o o uO 3 O '+ oLn v r o�-, d' M1 v r in V r uO o O o 0 o 0 w 0 0 0 eC ❑ z a z Z z i h h 0 ID 0 r 0 r r ID r a h a h a h , w Q m w m a � u o w F m w O o o O O O O O O N ID O O O N •'1 i!1 O 0 0 N I 4l o O O o O O O O o O O O O O O O o O m Z O• O O+ O r n r'1 lD in d' w �n 0 w in m lD �n O ID Ol o Ol O N m O f't N N r ^� tD F z �n In lD v r m In '+ O O Q U CJ N '-I C N w m lD w N CJ o o in o O 0 V Q O .y O rl O O O to O O O O O O O O n o W 3 0 u 0 u 0 u 0 u U � W s O m u po, f❑f�� �w+ QZQ W > m w a m w w m w a m w w z vpi w m W W o El w F w w w a Q w rJ iil o� cY m 5 a a a a m a F Wz O h U OU W Q W [wi.rz u Q ' N 0 qa �l ya 7 O o >+ U H u Q u > o o U w m 0 O < a m 0 O a u 0 m O Q O u 0 - o O w w 0 O ❑ w w o O O w w c O ❑ w w o O ,Z W m o •-� o a O m v, o O o .-� o a o In O d It a In ID O d G a 041 32 0 0 'y Z. z m o 1p r m 0 � N F 4 a a H S m F H F F F F H F E F H H F E H F H F O ry F Z F z 0 o . O 0 0 . O o 0 . O O 0 . O o 0 . O 0 0 . O o o . O H O . ry O� . o O . r n . H H . � N . Ip r . pI O . o r n H N ff . . . a. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r m 0 O N ca m O cn 0 N z E+ 0 m N O ca 0 N a O m 0 N a O m 0 N 0 Z N O O O O O Ea O 0 u u u tlg5� u .t1Sy� u .tS1y� u �vSy� u �tlSy� S �t/Sy� u++ u u w O ¢OO F >q Hap F > EF �Ep vJ �a ao , p� ( > EF a � > "F a Q u H� ai O F a P (�u�+ a s WWw m a a w a ((a77 u > E+ W a a $ F z W a 8 z W � H a 8 .] E Z a W 8 F a 8 Z W F m 8 Z W � a 8 m Z W m W m W m W m W m W m W m W m W W W m m m H m U W > W W > > z W 2 W > W W > > z W > W W > W W W > H W H W H W H W S W H W H W i H W M H H W W W .n w c H H u H H H u a a a a a a a a a a a u w oo > a w © o 0 o N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N Z H G z .+ L Z Z Z Z Z Z S z a w w a o0 w F a w 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 o 0 m O O O H 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 � o z o rn 0 N 0 0 N 0 am 0 0 m 0 0 m 0 0 Cl 0 N 0 ON 0 0 0 0 n 0 r o o m n 0 o -+ 0 m n 0 o rl 0 0 0 0 n r o v e F z O u N Ifl I2: 1(1 N lfl N t/l Ill N Ifl r Ill �O Ill ID O .-� r 0 n O r N r N r O r ID 1D o O Ill u H H H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O .-I O .-1 O H O H O O O H H H a w a 0 o N 0 o z z .t a u z z w a a b E z a R 0 o W u u u u u u u u u u u r a w¢ o 3 a W a E H m h a z O o a O za Z H W HH W FF W H W E W F W HE W H W Ell a z E a u a 8 E 0 w a % of u m u u ai u u co u vi u m u ai v5i m u u u 0w 0 >+ a u 0 .-+ O aJ 0 O 0 H fJ E 0 O H s O H o 0 N O o o H O w N O O a N 0 O a N O O a N 0 O w N 0 O a N O O N O O a, N 0 O a N In O O 0 O O O a am a 04233 G O F Z N o Y w F ca o µEw7 F { E�77 F EWW E {E�77 F µES F � E�.77 F ��..77 F WEW F WW H m F WE F F rn El rn E. a 0 N a i F z O o O D• 0� ,It O O 10 - O O O m N n d .-i 1D n ID 00 O ID O O O O O O O O O O L� 10 O O O O O N n m ^ 0 d 0 0 0 rl 0 r1 0 u u u rn n E ID Z O W r'i C.9 Z o O O in U z O O O O 0 U' vi z 1D p ID N > d O O C'J z C7 Z O O O CL O v: V1 •+ O N d '+ E 2 o a D W a G7 w W a W a 04 El R E as E > E H d C7 H 4 E H a �• u w 7 2 a a u n >>> LLpp E y N m 4 a4 u 0 >+ Z E w saQd L4 a O Z W EI F z 7 F 0 7 z 9 0 z a z w E.w -1 y 00 0 z W a O p O z F w F z i O O z w m a m +� o04 0 M p w m w ft m m 0: m CL U i o u > a > 0 U x > W a > 0 u 0 u > x > a > w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 Q a � Z i z ¢ a a Q a w m 2 Q m 0 o0 E w x w m L o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y 5 U n % %D O ~ O n n 1p n ID �D O O C• u'1 n w 1D O O n O 0 ifl rn C.O ifl u1 a,o �(1 �n N N 0 0 O � rn O Ul -+ N N O O u N N O 0 Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p E E Q r W In w w p GAL Q v5I U v�� 4 vT1 v v�1 v tz�vL� U U t�� u Wvl En a a0 H H m En Z a u E E O w • a Q u z 0 Q, F F a F a H w Ei w w H W w E w w N w a w Ci W x E z u Q H ac F a o p w W VI Q a O A Z rn Q U V] Q U VI U V] U V] U C/I U cn U U h h W a co D: EoE+ u > a ul p 4 p :. u 0 O w a O EOE-.� W 0 O (O(�� i+l 0 O EO-� W 0 O [O W 0 O 0 0 1 E0 W 10 c q PL O 0 a O �(t O a O d O 0: O d ,yOcl.y' U) O O O 0 043 34 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP5005 CHECK REGISTER CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NO. NAME ***NO CHECKS WERE USED FOR PRINT ALIGNMENT.*** 39944 01/26/00 CAL160 CA PARK & REC SOC DIST XI 39945 01/26/00 HER010 JERRY HERMAN 39946 01/26/00 KIN100 KINER/GOODSELL ADVERTISNG 39947 01/26/00 ULT100 ULTIMATE INTERNET ACC INC 39948 01/26/00 UNU050 UNUM LIFE INS 39949 01/26/00 VER050 FREDRICO VERDUGO CHECK TOTAL 4:53PM 01/26/00 PAGE 1 PAYMENT AMOUNT 20.00 85.01 6776.64 20.00 1510.85 250.00 8,662.50 044 35 z 0 0 1 N o W c H E E E E H F a a 0 m o o In o 0 °P a O O iD O m G w o 0 o a9 � a a E E E W \ N U E •-� H F M El z a =3 a .a a s E a a o a 0 H [ 0 a 0 ¢ ¢ 0 01 0 p 0 0 > % £ 0 \ O z z O 0 E S R; Ll z U z ��pp z o o H z z W W a \ z w W U z W t� F W > E W > W > > > > m p o W a [Uil a s rzi w to m o w w o ¢ U q C O 914 r > w 10 w m m N m H z rn m a o 0 m w m a O6 O w E O, m (fj O if1 OD m O O V1 zy. n ID o ip v ip e 0 o � ri 0 io zN N il1 ^1 O 0 Q, O, U Q O O O O O O O H U !9 U C z z z n VI H w F F u H o m w a w u ¢ > > 0 0 En ¢ a� w z O 0 n a s a w 0 z cud U) m w m z z w o o w a z x c4i w o PQ a :4 cQi E a ru, W z z : W W Ft O G; E+ 7 �' z u h s X z O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G °u D O O O ut E u H x w z z E a z m w ¢ u u m ac at =3 > 041-16 A/P - AP6002 CHECKS TO BE VOIDED 10:19AM 02/01/00 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK ID: DEF PAGE 1 CHECK BK INVOICE VENDOR VENDOR INVOICE NUMBER ID DATE AMT. PAID NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 39094 DEF 10/15/99 267.94 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP OVERNIGHT MAILINGS 39094 DEF 10/15/99 35.00 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP OVERNIGHT MAILINGS 39094 DEF 10/15/99 30.00 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP OVERNIGHT MAILINGS 39094 DEF 10/15/99 14.00 FED010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP OVERNIGHT MAILINGS TOTAL VOIDED 346.94 045 3 w Tityl 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated December 31, 1999 for the City of La Quinta. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. esp c fully su �A�'� J hn M. Falco d, , Finance Director Approved for Submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 047 T4ht 4 4 Q" MEMORANDUM TO: La Quinta City Council FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for December 31, 1999 DATE: January 31, 2000 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending December 31, 1999. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Dept. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: Investment Beginning Purchased Sold/Matured Other Ending__ c 'Cash (1) $596,579 0 $1.469,650 2,066,229 $1 ILAIF $10,889,999 600,000 5.900,000 5.589.999 (5, US Treasuries (2) $18,067,979 3,992,165 0 (25,110) 22,035,034 3, SUS Gov't Agencies (2) $17,670,586 1,945,049 0 49,163 19.664.798 1, Commercial Paper $0 0 0 0 Mutual Funds $5,082,446 0 1 1,937,980 3,144,466 — (1, Total 1152 307 589 _ 6�537 214 7 837 980 1 493 703_ $ 500,526 ,$ "hange ,469,650 300,000) 967,055 994,212 0 937,980) 192,937 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and ins in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. the City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. John M. Falconer i Finance Director/Treasurer Footnote (1) The amount reported in the other column represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury and Agency investments. 0091 C .4 �j Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W _ C .4 ^ 44 A q x c � 8 pi V U U. U U. a0 < m W coS N QQ N jq 4 I L. 1.2 y W o E X jp T N �+1 tV LD NVIIVI, ps 2All E�Z p C W x M � N g P a 2e ♦ de p 8 de Ir 2e ei T de p Op � 2e N 2e � Q Z N E� N't` o F. n t9i t� �i Z g g ape de 2e o 0 A o'e de O Q Z N E E OC L y ° W y� ho Q mU •�T Y b�Fi 3'i E . • o �Qp � a day{ m° e Q qg� � • ��WgW�C gg' N ti e vN Q� Bm B a S g$g,�, 0 Ei JAI > c cod W CL Z=�LA- i G y F rEl (7 s 20ul o r agago ag I R A G Yf wo0 � &9 004 E nn� w O L a Q rn c �U C f9 C_ LL C t0 > y, U U Q C Q E rn c o�_ 0 o >� m Z, � 4) o EE E E >, U cn 0 0 0 0 m GOO } V- CO (6 L6 0 CD C''QQQNNQ mz z z C) Z � CIO V r (p r O 4) CD 0 d) 0} O Q Q Q O O a ar-Zzzooz x O O uj m v N 0) 0) 0) wQ6Q66Q Ozpzooz CO 1` M iaU') Q.co �O p cc act •�to00CVLn00 e- `ttO 0039 c a � W Ci w cn c o >--ZN U-0 as=E � LL O LL N :3 U LL .0 V � U � L c O •- > Z C d Ga. w 0) it, C adQ u=i y C 0 � E 0N— cU� 0 C O E �zUgg»�� C N J0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'C rn rn rn rn OC7AOCA oz0000zz McONl4. �-rNN O 040 O Oco 0 0 Go O . 0OO&OOOt.:ti r-v).00pp p 0 cnm OO(D rP w U) rn c N m 0 0 0 0 0 CL cno00ooa ,6aaan.aLL, O2 0 w w w N F- 0_ coo : :- .- YNcnU)V)cn = 4 t U V a 0 c w N> cUUUU�LL c =zvg��gg2� coo IT C) N I'OOc!MO COMOMCO NOGONN IO OO h C a O O� N � yOj C t oo N Q E ` -0 m p a.cn c a •� c'�� E m c E M a LNNacn c N C C N L O 0 E w-r- 00 N N O w E C 0 �sjc cr. a.a.._.,Q2 (�n•� N �N�pp f�N Oi O Ln O�i.p ��tO ONpi.N ��� Ni W A in m N N w�'e►pri coN iNff r N 4f Ol U r N A r ~ N p��p A O 00 Or 17 » ton to cm » Oaa in » Q � V IA A aj Q�^p a U N g c U. c pm Y. p y LL xY �p Oa'id 9 9C U. C Ca TS d C GOi V C 7 p N Ir LLa•'r !� Y.20. Ea $',`0 d,'3� x�a O E W v _ W �jj 9LL ULL c (L O Na � (D '5:a a mpg cgp 2Fi �, .`-�V).62 � w � � � 3 uC�C9U0c7NcU� co W /Or C ry�S9gagt� UOJy u gFi gN 10- �O <O Y) COsL V Hp 'AO P ; l+f 0 A hA O�I n n •7- ! 2k / !°■■■2° ■ ° !■■asa° ■E■#■■a �2�2tk§ ■ ° !E■#■■! � F ° A ¢ ■ | !I | q A�9 01 1ff rO.-p Ol NQN7{q V O N NA��N0 C. r Uf ^ V' M M N 00 O�ONOA WW AOOtpppO�IVm Q MO !O'f A O O V 1" tN M t r tD 01 N N A CO An ��N.A-'NC R!'i01N�in a „ON M CA ID tip to Aao 40 OOf Uf QOi p pf r)OOOtp 60 tD 0 1f) ap Ln 0 0 V h to p) ram„ O Ct Of i0 �► hOC; C1O0 NMMpt N V ^ � A IV to�SLL Nt�� N O N 13 N O 1fl oo tqptQp VCnto t�0 to R00 iffy 0�0_�j cPc t+Of 0OfN ppD 0�0.O �tO.c tcis b ONi in t0 yYj tff N tD 0100 R r A N t7 P N IR N «OHI w I� OO m pp tp O 00 OD PA, f" (0 pA� O r N rn „ A N �Nr O ,Q V t. NMO Of W) 0) {Vtpp Mto <tn O N < N P. ggo It toff N m In 40 k P1 V N'CNOr Mr,ZN I1 N O V tV aOD OA MOO�pt+AjO A Nmf7 MN� t9 Qf 40 M to A OOA I N A OtAO p ry OaO tNA h 0 a A f N A g t A Cr OD O[�lOP t t O OMD N< 00 �'f f A f A U. f MNrr Nfr�04 V N f N NOScn AOr pp CP C.OW O O A�Le,— A t0 C� O001fi OD O N O N O u Nam" �A ppOOf OrD in 0 MIG Otn lV N f tp LLNN NNM M�QI 10cla O tin 0 N O M Go OD f.- p C N Go 1 f f A q M O eltN O O171OfNOD y M n cn M r 3 .�,. � 0O01tA0n �Onppf N VA►ti0O0 r r r `Q N 07r �� t7r OIV v OI N r qNh TN�NI NM V Op 0010 tV .^ N Off « u ' N t? N t? �Nf ^O N M A r Of OIDOMeN7O O OMp �0�p) tG O Of Q h V O O r A O N E A NV W n t A r r N N N M in U) N .N..,. N t f f C L 9 7 O � C G F- N C N d � 7 N 0 C 0 X y N 0 N 0 R U f��f CCD C u m C t,1 G qC1 m l Y ^ A L N ry p F- t0 a LL C W o c O C N tYJ ~�x> N i- � Y1 d G o�aZ G y OI oxy � W C > S N q C O L 11 0- � 0 LL m N N o f- U) & . N N L w V) i4r) 8 O d z U Cl wz df 40 0 O OD G M O �f w f f 6f N t0 y� N�p L O U C tp u U a C Z 4) 2CL G y C t-5 k CITY OF LA QUINTA CRY CITY RDA RDA FA BALANCE SHEET 12(31199 FIXED LONG TERM FIXED LONG TERM FINANCING LONG TERM GRAND CITY ASSETS DEBT RDA ASSETS DEBT AUTHORITY DEBT TOTAL ASSETS: POOLED CASH 140.312.22 6.031.333.58 (7.476.74) 6,164,169.06 LORP INVESTMENT IN POOLED CASH 705,000.00 705.000.00 INVESTMENT T-BILLMOTESB.OTHER 30.000.000.00 30,000,000.00 AUTO MALL CASH 682,706.14 682.766.14 LORP CASH 103.293.31 103.293.31 BOND REDEMPTION CASH 407,125.57 20.73 407,154.30 BOND RESERVE CASH BOND PROJECT CASH 14,095,484.55 592.845.39 14,688,309.94 BOND ESCROW CASH PETTY CASH 1.000.00 1,000.00 CASH i INVESTMENT TOTAL 30,824,078.36 21,342,217.01 595.397.38 52.7SI,692.75 INVESTMENT IN LAND HELD FOR RESALE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT LORP-ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE INTEREST RECEIVABLE LOANINOTES RECEIVABLE DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS DUE FROM RDA INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE FROM RDA ADVANCES TO OTHER FUNDS NSF CHECKS RECEIVABLE ACCRUED REVENUE TRAVELADVANCES EMPLOYEE ADVANCES PREPAID EXPENSES 60,300.00 60,300.00 RECEIVABLE TOTAL 9.545.070.05 3,503,132.18 8,260,000.00 21,308,202.23 47.154.48 60,900.00 (234,339.28) (16,828.08) 47.719.16 12.268.93 25,691.74 2,868,850.80 127.994.00 785,357.14 741,656.90 6,890,277.20 1.450.370.34 377,110.65 1,896.86 $33.40 978.00 WORKER COMPENSATION DEPOSIT 37,637.00 RENT DEPOSITS UTILITY DEPOSITS 75.00 MISC. DEPOSITS 2,100.00 DEPOSITS TOTAL 39,812.00 8,260,000.00 8,368,054.46 (251.167.36) 47.719.16 12,288.93 2.694.542.54 127.984.00 1,527,014.04 6.890.277.20 1,450,370.34 377.110.66 1.896.66 833.40 978.00 37,537.00 75.00 2,100.00 39.812.00 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 1,289,694.28 15,146,522.00 10,233,508.05 26,669,722.33 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (585,360.27) (505.360.27) AMOUNT AVAILABLE TO RETIRE LIT DEBT 3,395,117.03 3,395,117.03 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR LIT DEBT 1.677.482.02 94,894,916.06 8,260,000.00 104,832,398.08 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 704,334.01 15.146.522.00 1,677,482.02 10,233,506.05 98,290,033.09 8.260.000.00 134,311,877.17 TOTAL ASSETS 41,113,294.42 15,146,522.00 1,677,482.02 24,945,349.19 10,233,506.05 98 290 033 09 6,845,397.38 8,260,000.00 208 411 584.15 LIABILITY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11,999.41 11,999.M DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES 473,591.93 473.591.93 DUE TO OTHER FUNDS 575.00 1,617,134.04 0,305.00 1,527,014.04 INTEREST ADVANCE -DUE TO CITY ACCRUED EXPENSES PAYROLL LIABILITIES 23,227.54 23,227.54 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTS 6,916.18 6.916.18 FRINGE TOED LIZARD FEES 21.740.00 21.740.00 SUSPENSE 130,128.81 130,128.81 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA _ PAYABLES TOTAL 656.179.46 11.999.44 1.517.134.04 9.305.00 2.194.617.94 ENGINEERING TRUST DEPOSITS 198.00 198.00 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY DEPOSITS ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES DEPOSITS 396,564.00 396,564.00 LORP DEPOSITS 15.364.00 15.364.00 DEVELOPER DEPOSITS 1,164,342.24 1,164,342.24 MISC. DEPOSITS 329,985.95 329.985.95 AGENCY FUND DEPOSITS 806,765.71 806,765.71 TOTAL DEPOSITS 2.697.855.90 15.364.00 2,713,219.90 DEFERRED REVENUE 8,270.67 8,260,000.00 8,268,279.67 OTHER LIABILITIES TOTAL 8,270.67 8,2WQ000.00 8,268,270.67 COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE 337,880.86 337,880.86 DUE TO THE CITY OF LA OUINTA 1,327,601.72 8,340,647.34 9,668,249.06 DUE TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE - 12.486.237.00 12,466,237.00 DUE TO C.V. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 10,068,148.75 10,058,148.75 DUE TO DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DIST. BONDS PAYABLE 67,415,000.00 (504.08) 8,260,000.00 75,674,495.92 TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 1,665,482.58 98,290,033.09 (504.08) 8,260,000.00 108,215,011.59 TOTAL LIABILITY EQUITY -FUND BALANCE TOTAL LIABILITY i EQUITY 3,362,306.03 37,750,983.39 15,146,522.00 1,677,482.02 1.532.498.04 98,2W,033.09 8,268,800.92 8,250,000.00 121.391.120.10 23,312,851.15 10.233.506.05 576,596.46 87,020,464.05 41 113 29442 15,148,522.00 1,677,482.02 24,845,349.19 10,233,506.05 98,290,033 09 8,845,397.38 8.260.000.00 208 411 (0.00) (0.00) ( \ CASH i INVESTMENT TOTAL 52,751,692.75 v PREMIUMIDISCOUNT ON INVESTMENT (251,167.361 TOTAL 52,500,525.39 T4ht °f 4aQ" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Request by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District to Use the Fritz Burns PUBLIC HEARING: Park Recreation Room for Summer Day Camp RECOMMENDATION: Approve a request by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District (CVRPD) to use the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room for Summer Day Camp, June 15 through August 18, 2000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: There will be an increase in utility costs. CVRPD has agreed to reimburse the City for 50% of the utility bills during the period of their use. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: CVRPD would like to use the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room to offer a Summer Day Camp program this year, as provided in Attachment 1. CVRPD has used the facility the past two years for the same program. The Community Services Department will be using the facility in the evenings for leisure activities. The use by CVRPD should not impact the City's programs. To ensure that both programs provide a safe and clean environment, an agreement will be made between both agencies containing guidelines for the tidiness of the facility at the end of each day. This arrangement was in effect during the Summer 1999 Day Camp program, and worked to the benefit of both organizations. The use of the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room impacts the utility costs at that site. A request has been made to CVRPD to pay half of the cost of the electricity and water for the site during the period of use. Last year, CVRPD paid 1 /3 of the utilities, however, the Summer Day Camp program uses more electricity and water than other programs. The amount charged to CVRPD for utilities last year was $236.86. An estimated cost for this year's utilities, at 50%, would be approximately $350.00. CVRPD recognizes that by offering the program at the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room, the utility costs will increase. Staff has discussed the payment issue with CVRPD and they agree to this arrangement. The City has received a Certificate of Coverage stating that the City is additionally insured for programs at Fritz Burns Park, including child care programs, as provided in Attachment 2. The current certificate expires March 31, 2000. Staff will ensure that an updated policy is received soon after March 31, 2000 for the current year. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve a request by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District to utilize the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room to conduct a Summer Day Camp program June 15 through August 18, 2000; or 2. Do not approve a request by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District to utilize the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room to conduct a Summer Day Camp program June 15 through August 18, 2000; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. submitted, Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Director Approved for submission by: !!!!Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Facility Use Permit by CVRPD for use of the Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room 2. Certificate of Coverage - CVRPD S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.030.wpd 002 City of La Quinta -�u ATTACHMENT 1 te FACILITY USE PERMIT s° R dFiled byy Amt. of fee $ Community Services Division Deposit $ Applicant Information �vOFTNF° Check/Cash? PefmitAppllCant Coachella Valley Recreation & Park District Receipts« Contact Person James Decker, Rec. Supervisor Phone(760) 347-3484 Contact Address 45-871 Clinton St. Cityjjip Indio, CA 92201 Facility Requested Sports Complex Field Number(s) 'Snack Bar Aestrooms 'Lights 'PA_ 'Bases 'Diamond Prep_ Fritz Burns Community Recreation portable building near City maintenance yard Park Tennis Complex Court Number(s) 'Court Prep Eisenhower Minipark 'Electricity 'indicates need for staff (additional cost) Time and Date Requested Day(s) Monday-— Friday Date(S) June 19 — August 18, 2000me(S)7:00AM — 6:30PM A_cti ft Information Yes No Open to the Public x _ Admission Charged x _ If yes, amount charged $ Adults_ Children $$ 205 per 3 week Fundraising Activity _ x If yes, please explain below session Alcoholic Beverages _ x It yes, go to Council and get ABC permit (3-4 week process) Food and Beverages x _If yes, describe below Amplified Sound _ x If yes, describe below Estimated Attendance Adults Teens Children (under13) 35 Describe Activity/Program and any Special Conditions: Summer Day Camp for boys and girls ages Kindergarten through 8th grade. Youth will bring a sack lunch each day and the District will supply two (2) snacks per day for the youth Day Camp will consist of games, activities, arts & crafts and special events The undersigned has received and understands the rules and regulations for the City of La Quinta facility selected above, and agrees to abide by such rules and regulations. The undersigned agrees to clearly and accurately convey the rules and regula- tions to all members in their party. The undersigned further certifies that the information provided above is true. The undersigned comprehends that this Application will be considered approved only when the indicated fees have been paid, and the Parks and Recreation Manager, or hislher designee, has signed the authorizing signature on this form. Signed Title (Qec. �i-tr)e,�,�'so� Date i�a8�ay�o Community Services Office only Class 1 II III IV (Please circle one) Approval Needed by: Planning_ Police_ Fire_ Finance_ Council_ Current Certificate of Insurance Yes_ No_ Limit Req'd Date Redd Fees and Deposits(per Ci(y of La Quinta Fee Schedule - total hourly or flat fee assessment) Facility Assessment - court, field, or park rental $ Snack Bar Field Lights Announcing System Diamond/Field/Court Prep/ Staff time Restrooms Bases Deposits (Security, Cleanup, Bases, Alcohol) TOTAL DUE $ r— n r— n r— -i r- 11 I I Z 1 I I I I 1 3 114 I I I I I L— J L— J L— J L— J r— n r— n 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 L— J L— J r— -i r— n I ' � I I L— J L— J Fntz Burro Community Park Tennis Comptez Avenue 50 and Bermuda - Rules and Regulations r, -i 1 fJ a I I snack sar Restroom Complex p��g I N I I t^ I City of La Quinta LI Sporft r n I I I 3 1 Avenue 50 and P icDrive L— J L— J _J I. Private events are limited to four hours in durations. 2. The City of La Quinta has priority use of facilities. La Quinta city residents have second priority. All others follow in priority. 3. Deposits are due with the Application. Deposits will be refunded within five days of the end of the event, providing the facility has not been damaged or left in poor condition. 4. Cleanup of facility includes removing all bottles, cans, cups, and paper waste to trash receptacles; moping up spills; leaving equipment in clean condition; removing decorations; taking down chairs and tables; and any other item which has been dirtied or soiled as a result of use. 5. Permits from the Police, Finance, ABC, or another agency may be required for the proposed activity. b. Any advertising (content, wording, format, style, or design) of the proposed program or activity must be reviewed by the City Clerks office prior to public notice. 7. Users are required to review and understand the complete rules and regula- tions packet, provided to each confirmed user. I have read, understood, and agree to comply with the above. Signature �� Date Liability Statement I, (print name) James Decker , as permittee, and the user group (name of user group) Coachella Valley Rec. & Park District , agree to hold the City of La Quinta harmless, and indemnify the City of La Quinta from any and all liability for injury to persons or property occurring as a result of the activity sponsored by the permittee, and said person shall be liable to the City of La Quinta for any and all damages to parks, equipment, and buildings owned or contro;lcd by the City wiliCii result hout dic aclivky of die permittee or is caused by any participant in said activity. All persons exercising any of the privileges authorized does so at his/her own risk without liability on the part of the City of La Quinta for the injuries to persons or property resulting therefrom. I have read, understood, and agree to inform all users in my activity of the above liability conditions of use. j.1 Date Application approved by: Date: Date copy sent to Applicant: 08/U6/99 14:31 Pal CV RECREATION I ��11CAPRI ATTACHMENT 2 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARK AND RECREATION INWRANCE 6341 AUBURN BOULEVARD, SUITE A, CITRUS HEIGHTS, CA 93621 The California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance (CAPK) is a joint powers authority comprised of California special districts. CAPRI was formed pursuant to Government Code sections 6500 and 990.8 and is governed by the joins powers agreement, bylaws and policies and procedures established by the Board of Directi; rs. CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR PARK AND RECREATION I NSU LANCE (CAPRI) This Certificate of Ccverage is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not alter, amend, or extend the coverage provided by the Memorandum of Coverage. Coverage is provided by the California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance in acc,Drdance with its Memorandum of Coverage. This is to certify that the Member District listed below is being 1,�rovided coverage by and through the Memorandum of Coverage for the period of April 1, 1999 through March 31 2000. MEMBER DISTRICT: Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District 45-871 Clinton Street Indio, CA 92201 COVERAGE PROVIDED: General Liability (Occurrence Form) CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Coverage Limits $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONIVEHICLES/SPECIAL '!GERMS for which this certificate of coverage is being issued: For the use of real property for district programs/events: Fritz Bums Park swimm:mg pool, tennis program, and child care. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: Should the coverage provided to the Member District named above be canceled before the ter u of coverage as stated herein the California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance (CAPRI) will ma. 15 days written notice to the certificate holder named, but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligati: )n or liability of any kind upon the California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance. California Association for Park and Recreation Insurance Authorized Representative: Date Issued: S 91 V'6T) 006 Titit 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: 4- ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Approval of Recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Program PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the City of La Quinta's recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award provides an opportunity to recognize and honor outstanding seniors throughout the Coachella Valley. Beverly Montgomery has been selected by a committee formed by the "Friends of the La Quinta Senior Center" as outstanding senior recipient who has met the following criteria: the honoree should be at least 70 years old; reside in the City of La Quinta; demonstrate involvement in community affairs for a lengthy period of time; and personify a healthy and active attitude and lifestyle. Attachment 1 provides a brief biography on Ms. Montgomery. This information will be printed in the program provided at the Senior Inspiration Luncheon. The City of La Quinta has sponsored a table at the Senior Inspiration Luncheon, which will be held on Wednesday, April 5, 2000. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve the City of La Quinta's recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award; or �C)l 2. Do not approve the City of La Quinta's recipient for the "Living for Your 90's" Senior Inspiration Award; or 3. Provide staff with alternate direction. s0mitted, rvitz,,Com%iunity Services Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Beverly Montgomery Biography '0s0`oo2 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.031.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 2000 LIVING FOR YOUR 90's SUGGESTED RECIPIENT Beverly Montgomery 78-483 Calle Huerta La Quinta, CA 92253 Telephone: 564-3317 DOB: 1929 Age:71 Beverly Montgomery has been a resident of La Quinta for 20 years. She was an original member of the La Quinta Ambassadors Group of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, served on the City Incorporation Task Force, was a Charter President of Soroptimist International of La Quinta, and has served as a volunteer and member of local elubs and organizations including Alternatives to Domestic Violence, Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley - La Quinta Site, the La Quinta Historical Society and the La Quinta Arts Foundation. Beverly has always been active in local organizations and believes in doing for others, especially for those less fortunate. She loves living in La Quinta and is proud to have been here when the City of La Quinta' was chartered. 03 004 T4ht 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: J�- ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Project No. 98-17, STUDY SESSION: Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement PUBLIC HEARING: Project Accept Project No. 98-17, Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project as 100% complete; and Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and Authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $26,418.20, 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion. Adequate funds are available (Account No. 401-668-609-553) in this project's budget to pay the retention to the contractor and close out this project. Since this project is partially funded through federal funding, the project was bid specifying prevailing wage rates. Therefore, there are no Charter City implications. On July 7, 1998, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 1998/99 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The adopted program includes the Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project, Project No. 98-17. The scope of this project called for rehabilitation and overlay of the existing pavement on Avenue 50 from Park Avenue east to Jefferson Street (approximately 4,950 linear feet). Improvements consist of the removal and replacement of existing pavement on the north half and placement of slurry seal on the south half from Park Avenue to Orchard Lane, and removal and replacement of the full section from Orchard Lane to Jefferson Street. T:\P W DEPTCOUNCIL\2000\000215g.wpd During the December 15, 1998 City Council Meeting, the City Council approved a Professional Service Agreement with Keith International Inc. to prepare plans, specifications and Engineer's estimate for Fiscal Year 1998/99 Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Project No. 98-17. On August 3, 1999, the City Council approved the plans, specifications, and Engineer's estimate and authorized staff to advertise Project 98-17 for bid. In addition, the City Council appropriated an additional $79,094.00 from City Infrastructure Funds to cover the additional matching funds required and to balance the revised construction budget. On October 19, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $259,783.00 to E.L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. for construction of Project 98-17, Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements, Park Avenue to Jefferson Street. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to accept this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. A final accounting of this Contract is as follows: Original Bid $259,782.95 Change Order #1(Quantity Variation) $6,630.36 TOTAL: $266,413.31 Amount Paid to Date ($237,763.84) Liquidated Damages $0.00 Total $28,649.47 Retention: $26,418.20 Retention to be Released $26,418.20 Outstanding Progress Payment $2,231.27 Total Remaining Fiscal Commitment $28,649.47 T:\PWDEP7ICOUNCIL\2000\000215g.wpd " O 0 The alternatives availble to the City Council include: 1. Accept Project No. 98-17, Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $26,418.20, 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; or 2. Do not accept Project No. 98-17, Avenue 50 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvement Project as 100% complete; do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and do not authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $26,418.20, 35 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vo Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: rAL Z.i�l/ Thomas P. Genovese City Manager pros 003 T:\P W DEPT\COUN CIL\2000\000215g.wpd T4'yl 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE• • Acceptance of Landscape Improvements and Release of Landscape Security Associated with Tract 23995-1, Inco Homes AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR:-" STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept landscape improvements to Tract 23995-1(Inco Homes) and authorize staff to release landscape security. None. None. The Desert Pride subdivision is located south of Miles Avenue and west of Adams Street (Attachment 1). The original developer (Inco Homes) completed 95% of the landscape improvements and received a 90% reduction in security. Inco later went bankrupt and, in the process, allowed the landscaping to deteriorate. When alerted to the problem, staff contacted the surety regarding the improvements and demanded that the landscaping be brought to a condition suitable for final acceptance. The work has now been completed in accordance with the approved plans and is ready for acceptance by the City. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Accept landscape improvements to Tract 23995-1 and authorize staff to release the landscape security; or 0s"? T:\PWDEP-RCOUNCIL\2000\000215j.wpd 2. Do not accept landscape improvements to Tract 23995-1 and do not authorize staff to release the landscape security; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: /1 Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map e.613 002 TAMD EMCO U NC I L\ 2000\000215j. wpd ATTACHMENT 1 tm T4'1t 4 4 Qum& AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Three Grant Deeds STUDY SESSION: Conveying Right of Way for Auto Centre Way North to the City of La Quinta - La Torre and Sowell PUBLIC HEARING: Accept the grants of right of way for Auto Centre Way North. City staff will complete weekly street sweeping of this street if it is accepted into the City's maintained system. This work will be completed utilizing in-house staff and funded through CSA 152 as part of the City's weekly street sweeping program. A slurry seal would be required approximately every five to seven years with restriping, costing approximately $3,500 for each application. The funding source would be the General Fund as part of the street's regular Pavement Management System. None. Stamko Development is presently completing construction for the La Quinta Auto Center. A secondary access to the La Quinta Auto Center is Auto Centre Way North, which is a right turn in right turn out access only on Highway 1 1 1 . All of the other streets within the La Quinta Auto Center have been dedicated to the City of La Quinta as public streets on a subdivision map; however, Auto Centre Way North was not dedicated as a public street on the subdivision map. Although the Specific Plan originally contemplated that this street would be private, there is flexibility in the Specific Plan text to allow decisions as to the projects internal streets on the question of public or private to be made as development occurred. Included as Attachment 1 is a letter dated February 4, 2000 requesting the City to accept three grant easement deeds conveying the right-of-way for Auto Centre Way North to the City of La Quinta. Included as Attachment 2 are three grant easement deeds executed and notarized by the owners to dedicate Auto Centre Way North as a public street. By accepting the right-of-way, the City will ensure consistent maintenance and vehicle law enforcement within the development. 070 The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the grants of right of way for Auto Centre Way North; or 2. Do not accept the grants and thereby require that this street remain a privately - maintained facility; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Christine Clarke letter 2. Grant of Easement Deed 011 � ? ATTACHMENT 1 THE AUTO CENTRE AT LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION 2205 N. Poinsettia Ave. Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 874-4800 Fax (310) 546-3679 February 4, 2000 Mr. Mark Weiss Assistant City Manager City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mark: The Auto Centre At La Quinta Association, the Sowell Family, LLC, and The Kelly Living Trust and The La Torre Living Trust (the "Owners"), hereby request that the La Quinta City Council in its February 15, 2000 meeting consider the acceptance of Auto Centre Way North (the "Street") for public dedication. Please note that this Street has been built to the City of La Quinta standards for public streets. The three (3) Grant of Easement Deeds that have been executed and notarized by the Owners have been given to Steve Speer on January 20, 2000. If you have any questions, please call me at (310) 874-4800. Very y yours, TINE F. CLARKE cc: Kent Sowell (via hand) Bob La Torre (via hand) Tom Kelly (via hand) Dave Stark (via hand) 0 ATTACHMENT 2 No Recording Fee Required Per Government Code Section 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which rl is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, THE GRANTOR, SOWELL FAMILY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Charter Corporation, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public street and public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described per Exhibit 'A' and as shown on Exhibit 'B' attached hereto and made a part hereof. Executed this 18TH day of JANUARY , 2000, at PALLY DESERT , California. SOWELL FAMILY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company By: Kent -,ftwnl, President 0*i, 6-05 M No Recording Fee Required Per Government Code Section 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, THE GRANTOR, THE AUTO CENTRE AT LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation, hereby grants to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Charter Corporation, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public street and public utility purposes, in, on, under, across and through all that real property described per Exhibit 'A' and as shown on Exhibit 'B' attached hereto and made a part hereof. Executed this 18TS day of _TA74MARV , 2000, at PALM DESERT , California THE AUTO CENTRE AT LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation By: obert N. LaTorre, Secretar By: K n Sowell, V'ce President 1)?4 006 Ll No Recording Fee Required Per Government Code Section 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 GRANT OF EASEMENT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned, THE GRANTORS, THOMAS L. KELLY AND KAREN J. KELLY, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS, AS TRUSTEES OF THE KELLY FAMILY TRUST, U/A DATED OCTOBER 12, 1999, a California Trust, which is also known as THE KELLY LIVING TRUST, and ROBERT N. LA TORRE AND MICKEY P. LA TORRE, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS, AS TRUSTEES OF THE LA TORRE FAMILY TRUST, U/A DATED OCTOBER 12, 1999, a California Trust, which is also known as THE LA TORRE LIVING TRUST, hereby grant to CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Charter Corporation, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for public street and public utility purposes,' in, on, under, across and through all that real property described per Exhibit 'A' and as shown on Exhibit 'B' attached hereto and made a part hereof. PAGE 1 OF 2 1)'7�i 007 Executed this 19TS_ day of JANUARy , 2000, at -PAsit DESERT , California. THOMAS L. KELLY AND KAREN J. KELLY, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS, AS TRUSTEES OF THE KELLY FAMILY TRUST, U/A DATED OCTOBER 12, 1999, a California Trust, which is also known as THE KELLY LIVING TRUST By : ✓ r' Thomas L. Kelly, Tru e By: K ren JU Kelly, f6ustee ROBERT N. LA TORRE AND MICKEY P. LA TORRE, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS, AS TRUSTEES OF THE TORRE FAMILY TRUST,.U/A DATED OCTOBER 12, 1999, a California Trust, which is also known as THE LA TORRE LIVING TRUST By: 'Robert N. La Torre, Tru tee By. Mi ey . La Torre, Trustee PAGE 2 OF 2 076 U08 L' EXHIBIT `.`A" RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION AUTO CENTRE WAY NORTH PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 AND LOT C OF PARCEL MAP 28525-1 AS SHOWN IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 193, PAGES 85 THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCEL 1 OF SAID PARCEL MAP 28525-1 MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 SOUTH 07038'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 364.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22001'28" A DISTANCE OF 30.75 FEET TO A POINT HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 14°22'32" WEST; THENCE ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 NORTH 07038'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 369.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; . THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 SOUTH 82021'04" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP 28525-1 MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 SOUTH 07038'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 364.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; 1 OF 3 009 ?' EXHIBIT "A" RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION AUTO CENTRE WAY NORTH THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22001'28" A DISTANCE OF 30.75 FEET TO A POINT HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 29040'24" EAST; THENCE ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 30.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 NORTH 07038'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 369.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 NORTH 82021'04" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C, SAID POINT BEING THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF A LINE HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 82021'04" WEST, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C SOUTH 82021'04" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 37021'04" EAST A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07038'56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C SOUTH 82021'04" EAST A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 07038'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52038'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C; 2OF3 010 EXHIBIT "A" �► RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION AUTO CENTRE WAY NORTH THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT C NORTH $2021'04" WEST A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID RIGHT OF DEDICATION CONTAINS 25,583 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BEING SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" AND HEREBY BEING MADE A PART HEREOF. 30F3 \\KEITHSC01 \Net-0\40382\SURVEY\MAP\RWDED.doc KII # 40583.000 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF June 30. 1999 DALE KELLEHER DATE Ord THE KEITH COMPANIES - PALM DESERT 760-346-9844 760-346-9368 Oil EXHIBIT "B" P.O.B. T.P.O.B. 1 30PARCEL C - - LOT� HIGHWAy > > 1 P1/ 28525-1 .91' 110.00'� N82'21'04"W 1287.09, � r 1146 18� 55.91' 30,00 .00 ~_ 85.91 All 2'21'04"W 787.96' PARCELS 330.00' B30, 360.00, LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH = 30, T1 N0T38'56'E 25•00' PARCEL A 1— T2 N3721'04'W 35.36' Cr T3 N52'38'S6"E 35.36' O PARCEL B PARCEL 1 Z T4 NOT38'56"E 25.00' PM 28525-1 i '3 t CURVE TABLE PM 19JI85-37 CURVE ' DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT C1 124'59'4T 80.00' 174.53' 153.66' �` n W to PARCEL 2 PM 28525-1 C2 46'04'42" 80.00' 64.34' 34.02' 1-„amp PM 193/85-87 C3 2701'28" 80.00' 30.75' 15.57' i z W o C4 22'01'28" 80.00' 30.75' 15.57' C- z C5 34'52'07" 80.00' 48.69' 25.12' NZ \ JA�9. C 4 CCj —1 P�1Te AUTO CENTRE DRI VE SCALE 1" =100' 0 50 100 200 300 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: `o LAND KELl,- F�o� ,ie Keith Companies Txc W6687 r� -xp.06/30/00 DALE KELLEHER DATE: sr� 41-865 Boordwolk Suite 101, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 346-9844 LS 6687 EXP. 6-30-00 lF °F Tit,, 4 4Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: CS ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Granting STUDY SESSION: Conditional Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision PUBLIC HEARING: Improvement Agreement for Tract 23773-4, Century Homes Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 23773-4, Century Homes. None. None. Tract 23773-4 is located north of Fred Waring, and west of Adams (Attachment 1) and consists of 20 residential lots (Attachment 2). The developer has requested the City Council's conditional approval of the Final Map which will allow 30 days for completion of its processing. As of February 7, 2000, City staff has not received approval of the Final Map from the City's Acting Surveyor; however, it is expected that a technically correct map will be submitted within the time allowed with its conditional approval. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Attachment 3) has been executed by the developer; however, the associated securities have not been received. As a result, City staff has prepared the attached Resolution which provides for conditional approval of the Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The approval is contingent upon receipt, within 30 days (March 16, 2000), of a technically correct Final Map suitable for recording by the County Recorder with all required signatures except for the City Clerk. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215e.wpd Once these items are received, the City Clerk will affix the City Seal to the Final Map and offer the Final Map for recording by the County Recorder. If any of the required items are not received by City staff within the specified time frame, the Final Map will be considered disapproved and will be rescheduled for City Council consideration only after all required items have been received. The developer has demonstrated to City staff that sufficient progress has been made with the documents required for conditional final map approval. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 23773-4, Century Homes; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council granting conditional approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 23773-4, Century Homes; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. ogt Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Tract Map 3. Subdivision Improvement Agreement T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215e.wpd ()$2- 002 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA QUINTA GRANTING CONDITIONAL FINAL MAP APPROVAL OF TRACT 23773-4, AND AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION FOR SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO VALIDATE THE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council conducts only two regular meetings per month and the time interval between these meetings occasionally creates an undue hardship for business enterprises and individuals seeking approval of subdivision maps, and WHEREAS, the City Council as a matter of policy allows a subdivider to have city staff present the map for approval consideration when the requisite items necessary for final map approval are nearly, but not completely, finished thus yielding to the subdivider additional production time for preparation of those items, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has demonstrated to city staff and the City Council that it has made sufficient progress with items required for final map approval, and it is reasonable to expect the subdivider to satisfactorily complete the items, including city staff review time, within thirty (30) days without adversely impacting other ongoing work commitments of city staff, and WHEREAS, Section 66458(b) of the Subdivision Map Act grants the City Council broad authority to authorize time extensions regarding final map approval, or disapproval, upon receiving it for consideration, and WHEREAS, the City Council relies on professional city staff to review all required items for conformance with relevant requirements, and it is therefore appropriate for the City Council to approve the final map subject to review and confirmation of the required items by professional city staff, within a reasonable period of time as specified by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of La Quinta does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. The final map for Tract 23773-4 is conditionally approved provided the subdivider submits all required items on or before March 16, 2000. Section 2. The City Council's approval of the final map shall not be considered valid until the City Engineer has signed the map indicating that it conforms with the tentative map, the Subdivision Map Act and all ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Engineer shall withhold his signature from the map until the subdivider has completed the following requirements to the City Engineer's satisfaction. 083 009 A. Produced a technically correct drawing of the map area that is suitable for recording by the County Recorder B. Has obtained all requisite signatures on the map title page, except for the City Clerk's signature. Section 4. The City Clerk shall withhold affixing the City Seal to the map title page, along with her attesting signature, until the City Engineer has signed the map. Section 5. The time extension for satisfying the requirements of the conditional approval for this final map shall expire when City offices close for regular business on March 16, 2000. If the subdivider has not satisfied the requirements in Section 3, herein, by the expiration deadline, the final map shall be considered disapproved. Disapproval does not deny any rights the subdivider may have under the Map Act to resubmit the final map for approval, or disapproval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dawn Honeywell City Attorney ., mj ATTACHMENT 1 w w cn z 0 0 z_ Q 42nd DARBY ROAD AVENUE STARLIGHT LANE f— w w SITE SKYWARD WAY FRED WARING DRIVE MILES AVENUE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 085 0(�6 t i Cl CURVE DATA �f 1AOIIIf 41141 101ow 7ANMT of Tmw' wvrar "I asp C l 4Y0F aonrtr ltiw - C a 4a06' 171r40• law aw C 4 4aW a7wYr 4aor n or C [ 4a00' 4817W JAW - laor C 0 41w' 4"N11' pir aO,IN NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR ENGINEER'S NOTES ANO BASIS OF BEARINGS. -Q� GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FC[T I i—b . 60 }L OR1[ Amm ORTA IOCM 1141111041 C 7 4w 45WW 7 RM CA 4tw 4nrN' ai74' 17.R' of 4aw' U'YJr [AA' J)-W C 10 4aw' mmlos' "..R' a004' C ll 4aar 401d10' ai0r stir 3 SHEETS1 IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TAAGT MAP NO. 03773-4 BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 5361. P.M.B. 11/78 IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 1B, T. S S, R. 7 E.. S.B.M. DUDEK & ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 1999 PALM DESERT. CA. ADAMS_ STREET 6le S� 24 N COTA'10' [ SKYWARD — T 40S/r — It ("$-A" _ �� WAY —� ----0. IT I T—or '1 lOT COIN[R IE11, 1.1.A NO 'W Mn0 o([D! AECpw[O O[C M , iw Iwo Al CiR. Mq 1M101 ANo Lo-- C0101O1 !'FIT. LLA N0. 21 Nnla4 0771OAL RDAIIOS A p-1� � Orr OI aw OLTNTA 1010lSOE Co1MfT. CA I07 0090 AtCORO[o o[C I000 A[ [B7. N4 40011pp 77B�y WFIC t WCdw[ OF SI MPE 20 COIMTV. CA 4MM' ((4767n) P a0o w,/ 4 � 9 o.:as D •D �T/ Z m z N CITY OF LAQUINTA ATTACHMENT 3 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT 23773-4 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 7th day of February 2000 , by and between Century Crowell Communities , a California Limited Partnership hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider," and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City." RECITALS: A. Subdivider has prepared and filed a final map or parcel map (the "Map") of a unit of land in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, which unit of land is known as Tract No. 23773-4 (the "Tract") pursuant to the provisions of Section 66410, et sec. of the California Government Code (the "Subdivision Map Act"). B. Prior to approval of the Map, Subdivider is required to install or agree to install certain public and private improvements (the "Improvements"). C. The Improvements have not been installed and accepted at this time. D. It is therefore necessary that Subdivider and City enter into an agreement for the installation of the Improvements as provided in Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Improvement Plans. Prior to submittal of the Map for approval by the City Council, Subdivider shall furnish original improvement plans meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct the public and private street, drainage, utility, landscaping, and other improvements required to'be constructed or agreed to be constructed under this Agreement as listed in Exhibit "A", and shall bear the full cost thereof. The methods, standards, specifications, sequence, and scheduling of construction shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement Security. A. One class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "performance security," shall assure the faithful performance of this Agreement including construction of the Improvements, payment of Subdivider's fair share of Improvements which have been or will be constructed by others ("Participatory Improvements"), and payment of plan check and permit fees. A second class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "payment security," shall assure the payment of the cost of labor, equipment and materials supplied to construct the Improvements. A third class of security to be provided by Subdivider, hereinafter referred to as "warranty security," shall serve as a guarantee and warranty of the Improvements for a period of one year following the completion and acceptance of the Improvements. Subdivider shall furnish performance and payment security prior to and as a condition of City Council approval of the Map. Subdivider shall provide warranty security after Improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council and prior to or concurrently with the final release of performance security. Warranty security shall not be required for Monumentation or Participatory Improvements. However, the City may utilize Monumentation Security for performance of or payment for the work in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. As part of the obligation secured by each of the performance security, payment security and warranty security, and in addition to the face amount of each such security, each such security shall include and assure the payment of costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing the obligations thereby secured. B. Improvement security shall conform with Section 66499 of the California Government Code and one or more of the following: 1) A cash deposit with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company, at City's option. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd Page 1of 6 003 2) Surety bonds, of the form specified in subsection 66499.2 of the California Government Code, issued by a surety or sureties listed in the U.S. Department of Treasury Circular 570 (latest version). 3) Certificates of deposit, in City's name, from one or more financial institutions subject to regulation by the state or federal government and having a financial quality rating of "A" or better and a commitment reliability rating of "R-2" or better on the Investment Data Exchange (of the Los Angeles County Treasurer's office). 4) Irrevocable letters of credit, issued by one or more financial institutions meeting the requirements of Paragraph (3), pledging that the funds necessary to carry out the completion of the Improvements are on deposit, guaranteed for payment, and constitute a trust fund which is not subject to levy or attachment by any creditor of the depositor until released by City. Letters of credit shall guarantee that all or any portion of the funds available pursuant to the letters of credit will be paid upon the written demand of City and that such written demand need not present documentation of any type as a condition of payment, including proof of loss. The duration of any such letter of credit shall be for a period of not less than one year from the execution of the agreement with which it is provided and shall state, on its face, that the letter of credit will be automatically renewed until such time that City authorizes its expiration or until sixty (60) days after City receives notice from the financial institution of intent to allow expiration of the letter of credit. 5) A lien upon the subdivided property, if City finds that it would not be in the public interest to require the installation of the Improvements sooner than two (2) years after recordation of the final map or parcel map for which the Improvements are required. The lien shall provide a collateral value of three (3) times the estimated cost of the Improvements and shall include the power of sale of the real property, all buildings and improvements thereon, or that may be erected upon or made thereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reservations, remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof. The collateral value of the property shall be established at Subdivider's expense through an appraisal approved by City. 6) An instrument of credit from an agency of the state, federal or local government, when any agency of the state, federal, or local government provides at least Twenty Percent (20%) of the financing for the Improvements. 7) When Subdivider is a non-profit.organization, security may be negotiable bonds, of the kind approved for securing deposits of public moneys with City or in favor of City, as specified in Section 16430 of the California Government Code, deposited, at City's option, with City or a responsible escrow agent or trust company. C. All securities shall be furnished in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit A. The amount of the performance security shall equal One Hundred Percent (100%) of the estimated cost of constructing the Improvements, including payment of plan check and permit fees, as estimated by the City Engineer or a duly authorized representative of the City Engineer. The amount of Payment security shall equal the amount of the amount of performance security, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A, and shall be furnished as a separate security. Warranty security shall equal Ten Percent (10%) of the amount of performance security except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit A. D. At the time of submittal of security, Subdivider shall pay to City administrative fees applicable to the form of security provided. Administrative fees shall apply to the subdivision (final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map) rather than to individual security instruments. The fees shall be paid separately for each different form and/or source (surety or financial institution) of security initially submitted and for substitution of securities but shall not be required for submittal of warranty security if the warranty security is of the same form and from the same source as the performance security it replaces. Administrative fees for security shall be as follows: 1) For certificates of deposit, bonds and letters of credit as described in Paragraphs 2), 3) and 4) of SECTION 3.B., which require the establishment of evidence of the reliability of the surety or financial institution, the administrative fee shall be One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). 2) For liens on real property as described in Paragraph 5) of SECTION 3.B., for which City will prepare lien agreements and subordination agreements, administer valuation'of the real property and administer the agreements over the life of the lien, all of which require legal assistance and financial advice, Subdivider shall pay to City an administration fee of One Half of One Percent (0.5%) of the estimated cost of the improvements secured but not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). TAPWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd O Page 2 of 6 009 3) For other forms of security listed in Section 3 B, above, there will be no administrative fee. E. Participatory Improvements, if any, are identified in Exhibit A. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place until the Participatory Improvements are constructed and actual costs are known and paid by Subdivider, or until Subdivider pays to City the estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements, and shall guarantee the reimbursement by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost of the Participatory Improvements. Payment security and warranty security shall not be required for Participatory Improvements. Upon written demand from City, Subdivider shall deposit cash with City in lieu of or in replacement of security guaranteeing Participatory Improvements. If Subdivider fails to deposit said cash within 30 days of the date of the written demand from City, City may present a written demand to Subdivider's Surety for payment of said cash and Subdivider's Surety shall pay to City the lesser of: 1) the amount demanded, or 2) the amount of the security. F. Security shall not expire, be reduced or become wholly or partially invalid for any reason, including non-payment of premiums, modifications of this Agreement and/or expiration of the time for performance stated in this Agreement, without express authorization from City unless the surety provides City with sixty (60) days written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. G. Security shall be released in the following manner: 1) Performance security shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance or approval, by the City Council of the Improvements subject to the provisions of paragraph B. 2) The City Engineer may authorize partial reduction of performance security as work progresses, upon application by Subdivider. However, no such reduction shall be for an amount less than Ten Percent (10%) of the total performance security provided for the faithful performance of the act or work. In no event shall security be reduced below that required to guarantee the completion of the act or work or obligation secured, plus Ten Percent (10%). The City Engineer shall not allow more than two partial reductions of security furnished for any improvement agreement. 3) Participatory Improvement security shall be released upon payment by Subdivider of Subdivider's share of the cost or estimated cost of the Participatory Improvements. 4) If City receives no notice of recorded claims of lien, labor and materials security shall be released in full 90 days after final acceptance and/or approval by the City Council, of the Improvements. If City receives notice of any recorded lien, the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 5) Warranty security not utilized during the warranty period shall be released one year after final acceptance or approval by the City Council of all Tract Improvements. However, if at the end of the one-year warranty period, there are one or more outstanding requests by City for performance of work or provision of materials under the terms of the warranty, warranty security shall be retained until the outstanding requests are satisfied or until Subdivider has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City Engineer. 4. Permits Required. Prior to commencing any phase of work, Subdivider shall obtain all permits required for that phase of work and pay all required fees. Work performed under a permit or permits shall comply with all provisions of the required permits. 5. Off -site Improvements. When the construction of one or more of the Improvements requires or necessitates the acquisition of real property not owned by Subdivider or City, Subdivider shall use its best efforts purchase such real property at a reasonable price. In the event that Subdivider is unsuccessful, despite its best efforts, to acquire such real property at a reasonable price, Subdivider may request in writing that City attempt to acquire such real property. City may, but is not required to, agree to attempt to acquire such real property on behalf of Subdivider. If City so agrees, City and Subdivider shall enter a separate written agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Said separate agreement shall provide that Subdivider advance to City One Hundred Fifty Percent (150%) of the appraised fair market value of the real property. Any unexpended portion of said advance shall be refunded to Subdivider. Any additional funds required for acquisition of the real property shall be paid by Subdivider to City upon the conveyance of said real property to Subdivider. In no event shall the failure of Subdivider or City to acquire such real property excuse, waive, or otherwise terminate Subdivider's obligation to construct the applicable improvement pursuant to this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval. T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd 089 Page,3 160 6. Completion of Improvements. Subdivider shall begin construction of the Improvements within ninety (90) days and shall complete construction within twelve (12) months after the approval of this Agreement. Portions of the Improvements may be completed at a later date, as determined by the City Engineer or as set forth in Exhibit A. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the Improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this agreement, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the Improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the Improvements. Said failure shall not otherwise affect the validity of this agreement or Subdivider's obligations hereunder. 7. Force Maieure. In the event that Subdivider is unable to perform within the time limits herein due to strikes, act of God, or other events beyond Subdivider's control, the time limits for obligations affected by such events will be extended by the period of such events. 8. Time Extension. Subdivider may make application in writing to the City Council for an extension of time for completion of the Improvements. The City Council, in its sole and absolute discretion, may approve or deny the request or conditionally approve the extension with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. As a condition of the time extension, Subdivider shall furnish securities, similar in form and substance to those required in SECTION 3 hereinabove, to cover the period of extension. The value of the securities shall be sufficient to ensure the performance of and payment for Improvements that remain incomplete at the time of the extension, and to provide warranty security on completed Improvements. 9. Survey Monuments. Before• final approval of street improvements, Subdivider shall place survey monuments in accordance with the provisions of Sections 66495, et sec. of the Subdivision Map Act and of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Subdivider shall provide the City Engineer written proof that the monuments have been set, evidence of payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor setting the monuments, and intersection monument tie -outs for monuments set in public streets. 10. Final Acceptance of Improvements. At the completion of construction and prior to acceptance of the Improvements by City, Subdivider shall submit a request for final approval by City. The request shall be accompanied by any required certifications from Subdivider's engineers or surveyors, approval letters from other agencies having jurisdiction over and approval authority for improvements required by this Agreement or the Conditions of Approval, and any required construction quality documentation not previously submitted. Upon receipt of said request, the City Engineer or a duly -authorized representative will review the required documentation and will inspect the Improvements. If the Improvements are determined to be in accordance with applicable City standards and specifications, and as provided herein, obligations required by the Conditions of Approval and this Agreement have been satisfied, and Subdivider has provided revised plans as required in Paragraph 11, hereinafter, the City Engineer shall recommend acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council. 11. Revisions to Plans. When the Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Engineer, Subdivider shall make any necessary revisions to the original plans held by City so the plans depict the actual Improvements constructed. When necessary revisions have been made, each separate sheet of the plans shall be clearly marked with the words "As -Built," "As -Constructed," or "Record Drawing," the marking shall be stamped by an engineer or surveyor, as appropriate for the improvements thereon, who is licensed to practice in California, and the plans shall be resubmitted to the City Engineer. 12. Improvement Warranty. Subdivider hereby guarantees the Improvements to City for a period of one (1) year, beginning on the date of final acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, and shall repair or replace such defective work or materials. 13. Release of Security. City shall retain and release securities in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of this agreement. Prior to the release of payment security, the City Engineer may require Subdivider to provide a title report or other evidence sufficient to show claims of lien, if any, that may affect the amount of payment security released. 14. City Right to Cure. If Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder and such obligation has not been performed within sixty (60) days after written notice of default from City, then City may perform the obligation, T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd 0 90 Page 4 1 6 and Subdivider shall pay the entire cost of such performance by City including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing such obligation. In cases of emergency or compelling public interest, as determined by the City Engineer, the requirement for written notice of default and/or the passage of sixty (60) days shall be deemed waived and all other provisions of this Article shall remain in effect. 15. Indemnification. Subdivider hereby binds itself, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, executors, administrators, guarantors, heirs, and assigns, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and assigns harmless from and against any losses, claims, demands, actions, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way connected with Subdivider's performance herein under, including costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. 16. No Modification of Conditions. This Agreement shall in no respect act to modify or amend any provision of the Conditions of Approval. In the event that any requirement or condition of this Agreement is inconsistent with or fails to include one or more provisions of the Conditions of Approval, which document(s) is (are) incorporated herein by reference, the provisions in the Conditions of Approval shall remain in effect and shall control. 17. Severability. In the event that any provision or provisions of this Agreement are held unenforceable, all provisions not so held shall remain in full force and effect. 18. General Provisions A. All notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at their respective addresses indicated hereon. Notices personally delivered shall be effective upon delivery. Notices mailed as provided herein and sent postage prepaid shall be effective upon the date of delivery or refusal indicated on the return receipt. Either party may change its address for notices hereunder by notice to the other given in the manner provided in this subparagraph. B. The terms, conditions, covenants, and agreements set forth herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors of the parties hereto. C. Neither party to this Agreement relies upon any warranty or representation not contained in this Agreement. D. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted with respect to the laws of the State of California. E. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to prompt payment of its reasonable attorneys' fees from the non -prevailing party. F. Any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies provided for hereunder. 991 T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd Page L91 2 Exhibit A SECURITY - TRACT 23773-4 Except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall furnish performance security and labor & materials security prior to agendization of the Map for approval by the City Council. Improvements designated as "Participatory" have been or will be constructed by others. Security for Participatory Improvements shall remain in place indefinitely until called upon or released by City. Monumentation security shall guarantee performance of or payment for the work and shall be utilized or released as specified in Chapter 4, Article 9 of the Subdivision Map Act. As elements of the work are completed, Subdivider may request a maximum of two partial releases of performance security. Partial releases shall be for not less than ten percent (10%) of the total performance security for the tract and shall not reduce total performance security below the amount necessary to complete the Improvements plus ten percent (10%) of the original amount. Partial releases of performance security will be evaluated and may be granted, in whole or in part, by the City Engineer. Requests for partial releases, setting forth in detail the amount of work completed and the value thereof, shall be made in writing to the City Engineer. Labor & materials security shall remain in place until 90 days after all required tract improvements are complete and accepted by the City Council. Improvement Description Performance Labor & Materials Grading $59,415 $59,415 Streets & Storm Drainage 80,093 80,093 Domestic Water 67,617 67,617 Sanitary Sewer 27,432 27,432 Electrical 55,000 55,000 Monumentation 5,500 0 Totals: $295,057 $289,557 09z-� G,13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk SUBDIVIDER: Title: Ed Knight, l+oject Manager Date City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760/777-7075 Starlight-CCC, LLC a California limited liability company Century Crowell Communities, a California Limited Partnership By: Century Homes Communities a California Corporation, its General Partner (909)381-6007 February 7, 2000 Date By: February 7. 2000 Title: Marty Autler, Project Manager Date Reviewed and Approved: City Engineer Date Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date T:\PWDEPT\STAFF\GUZMAN\TRACTS\AGREEMEN.TS\23773-4.wpd 093 Page 6 f CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this 7th day of February , 2000 before me, Doris A. Benoit, Notary Public, personally appeared Ed Knight and Marty W. Butler , personally known to me, to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signature on the instrument the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. [hia arse for Officiel Not—iel S-1 WITNE S my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public * DORIS A. BENOIT COMMISSION 0141764 3 Q p NoVw PUBLIC.CAUFORNIA 3) S * BANBERNARDINOCOMW 1* dpftrj wbn EVW JUNE 13, 2001 (OPTIONAL) TYPE OF DOCUMENT Subdivision Improvement Agreement For Starlight-CCC, LLC Tract 23773-4, Lots 1-20 094 ( 15 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CENTURY HOMES COMMUNITIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION On January 5, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of Century Homes Communities was held at the Corporation's office at 1535 So. "D" Street, San Bernardino, California: SIGNING AUTHORIZATION: RATIFICATION OF PRIOR ACTS WHEREAS, the Corporation is the general partner of Century Crowell Communities, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Century Crowell'); WHEREAS, Century Crowell was formed for the purpose of acquiring land and developing same with single family homes; WHEREAS, the Corporation has determined that it is in the best interests of Century Crowell that ownership in each Century Crowell project ("Project") be vested in a limited liability company or limited partnership ("Project Entity"); WHEREAS, primary responsibility for management of the Projects has been delegated to the corporation's Project Managers, who are Ed Knight, Kenny Felkel, and Marty Butler. RESOLVED, that in connection with the development of any Project, any Project Manager (or Gary Weintraub as Vice President or Assistant Secretary or Tony Scimia as Vice President or Assistant Secretary) is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity, and as general contractor to the Projects, any and all documents in connection with plan checks, permits, entitlements, and all other documents relating to city, county, water district and other governmental agency actions respecting the Projects. RESOLVED, that in connection with the development of any Project, Gary Weintraub, as Vice President or Assistant Secretary, or Tony Scimia, as Vice President or Assistant Secretary, is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as General Partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity, surety bonds, and all documents relating to same, in connection with the Projects. RESOLVED, that Joyce Montgomery is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity and as general contractor to the Projects, all documents as required for the issuance of the DRE Public Report for the Projects. RESOLVED, that copies of these Minutes may be provided to any person or public agency requiring evidence of authorization. ALL SUCH PERSONS OR PUBLIC AGENCIES ARE HEREBY PUT ON NOTICE THAT ALL AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES HEREUNDER ARE SIGNING ONLY IN THE CAPACITIES SET FORTH HEREIN AND ARE NOT INDIVIDUALLY OR PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR ANY DEBTS OR OBLIGATIONS OF THE CORPORATION, CENTURY CROWELL OR ANY PROJECT ENTITY. All Directors were present and unanimously consented to the above. DATE: January 5, 2000 ATTEST: vv l,"% ohn W. Pavelak, -14* Ernest 0. Vincent, Assistant Secretary MydocWatrnmum\corpomt010500.doc 095 u,16 T4'!t 4 4&QK&rw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the STUDY SESSION: City's Intent to Vacate a Portion of the 10' Wide Public Utility Easement Reserved Adjacent to Spanish PUBLIC HEARING: Hills Lane in PGA West Tract 28603-1, Street Vacation 2000-041 Adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the City's intent to vacate a portion of the 10' wide public utility easement reserved adjacent to the southeast side of Spanish Hills Lane in PGA West Tract 28603-1. None. None. State law' gives authority to the City Council to vacate city streets, portions of city streets, or public easements, that it finds are unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes. The statute prescribes a specific procedure under which the vacation may be implemented. The vacation process requires that the City Council adopt a Resolution that declares its intent to vacate the specifically identified parcel of land. The Resolution of Intent must set a date and time for a public hearing to hear evidence offered by any interested person. The public hearing may occur no sooner than fifteen (15) days after the Resolution of Intent is adopted. In accordance with this state law, the proposed Public Hearing date for this vacation is March 7, 2000, which provides a twenty-one (21) day noticing period. 'California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 8300, which is entitled the Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law. %J K) T:\PWOEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215b.wpd The proposed Resolution of Intent contained herewith sets in motion a number of administrative activities that are required to occur prior to the Public Hearing. The activities include posting notices at the proposed easement vacation location and publishing a Public Hearing notice in the newspaper. During the Public Hearing, the City Council makes its decision as to whether or not to approve the proposed vacation. Victor L. Villeneuve is the applicant for the proposed vacation. Mr. Villeneuve represents Steven Walker Homes, the benefitting landowners if the easement vacation is approved. All of the documents describing the proposed vacation area have been prepared by professionals retained at their expense. At the time of map recordation for Tract 28603-1, the City was dedicated a 10' wide public utility easement on both sides of Spanish Hills Lane, as shown on the final tract map recorded May 10, 1999. The surrounding street improvements are being installed by the developer of PGA West, Tract 28603-1 (Attachment 1). Spanish Hills Lane is a private cul-de-sac street within PGA West, with eight lots on the northwest side of the street, but only a single lot on the southeast side, (the applicant's lot is Lot 52). The applicant has contacted some of the potentially affected utility purveyors and received preliminary comment that no existing utility facilities exist on the applicant's side of the street. It appears that the utility companies located their facilities on the northwest side of the street, where the majority of lots are located. The City will contact all utility purveyors to ensure that said public utility easement is not required for current or future facilities. The home builder and applicant, Steven Walker Homes, constructed a 2' x 2' concrete pad footing anchoring a decorative column that supports a patio roof at the rear of the dwelling structure 1.68 feet within the 10' wide public utility easement (Attachment 2). The applicant desires to have the entire 10' wide easement adjacent to their Spanish Hills Lane frontage vacated rather than a small portion of it. Street Vacation 2000-041 is specifically described and shown in Exhibits "A" and "B," of the proposed Resolution and contains a portion of the Spanish Hills Lane 10' wide public utility easement. It appears at this time that the public utility easement is not needed by public agencies or other property owners for access, or improved accessibility, to residential properties. There are no street improvements within the proposed vacation area. The proposed vacation is categorically exempt under Section 15305, and not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On February 4, 2000, staff mailed notices to all potentially affected public agencies, informing them of the proposed easement vacation. No public agencies or utility companies have requested easement retention or provided negative comments regarding this street vacation case at this time. 097 002 TAMDEMCOUNCIL\2000\000215 b. wpd The proposed Resolution declares the City's intent to vacate the subject public utility easement. It is not the final act with regard to the vacation process. A Public Hearing must be held before the vacations can be approved. A Public Hearing is scheduled for March 7, 2000. The Planning Commission has made a General Plan consistency finding approving the proposed street vacation during its February 8, 2000 meeting. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the City's intent to vacate a portion of the 10' wide public utility easement adjacent to Spanish Hills Lane, located within PGA West, Tract 28603-1; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring the City's intent to vacate a portion of the 10' wide public utility easement adjacent to Spanish Hills Lane, located within PGA West, Tract 28603-1; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vo Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Index Map of Tract 28603-1 2. Plot Plan of Lot 52 098 003 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215b.wpd RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO SPANISH HILLS LANE IN PGA WEST TRACT 28603-1. STREET VACATION CASE NO. 2000-041 WHEREAS, the Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easement Vacation Law, commencing with Section 8300 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California empowers City Councils with the authority to vacate Street Right -of -Way and Public Utility Easements within its jurisdiction that are found unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and WHEREAS, the City Council is required by law to adopt a resolution declaring its intention to vacate the subject portion of Right -of -Way at least 15 days prior to conducting a public hearing regarding the proposed street vacation, and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to conduct the public hearing to hear evidence presented by any interested party prior to approving or rejecting the proposed street vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the procedure prescribed in Chapter 3 of the Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easement Vacation Law, the City Council of the City of La Quinta declares its intention to vacate a portion of the public utility easement adjacent to Spanish Hills Lane, more specifically described on Exhibits "A" and "B". SECTION 2. A public hearing will be conducted on the 7th day of March, 2000, at 7:00 P.M. in the La Quinta City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation will be heard. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be published at least fifteen days before the date set for the hearing. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be posted within fifteen days before the date set for the hearing in three (3) public places established by the City Council. 999 004 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215b.wpd RESOLUTION 2000- Page 2 SECTION 5. The Public Works Director shall cause this Resolution and Exhibits "A" and "B," to be conspicuously posted in the proposed vacation area at locations not more than 300 feet apart, as least two weeks prior to the public hearing scheduled for March 7, 2000. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of February 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California /-A11111i9436 JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215b.wpd 10.0 005 EXHIBIT 99A99 STREET VACATION 2000-041 LOT 52 - TRACT NO. 28603-1 THAT PORTION OF THE 10.00 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN LOT AS FILED IN BOOK 279, PAGES 77 THROUGH 83, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS IN RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SHEET 1 OF 2 52 OF TRACT NO. 28603-1, THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 52; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH- EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 52, SOUTH 39'40'00" EAST, 10.00 FEET, TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 10.00 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 50'20'00" WEST, 63.70 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 121.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS, NORTH 39'40'00" WEST, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3737'12`, AN ARC LENGTH OF 84.02 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 7Tl7'1Y WEST, 10.00 FEET, TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 52 AND SAID 10.00 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 131.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 79'17'12" WEST, THENCE NORTH- EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3737'12", AN ARC LENGTH OF 90.93 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 50'20'00" EAST, 63.70 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: � U CHRIS J. BER , L.S. 6 EXP. 12/31 /0 LAND A LS. 6586 Exp. 12-31-M OF' CAI 10, 006 EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 2 OF 2 STREET VACATION 2000-041 LOT 52 — TRACT NO. 28603-1 d 's 10 TRACT NO. 28603--J / •s. 279/ 1-1-�83 1 LOT C 9 EXIST. 10' P.U.E. PER �j • ��s• / TRACT NO. 28603-1 8 TO REMAIN. /�4` EXIST. 10' P.U.E. PER / ,4 P TRACT NO. 28603-1 SCALE 1" =50' i ol • TO REMAIN. N 39' 40' 00' V io.00 LOT E GJ� tio�6 6'S• ,) &ha 52 N .S 10' N 79'17'V►y 1a'_ a LOT H R.S 10/9— 6-08 PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: a CHRIS J. BE H, L.S. &8 DATE EXP. 12/31 /03 TRACT NO, 28603 J 51 50 EXIST. 10' P.U.E. PER TRACT NO. 28603-1 TO REMAIN. I -- — —--L,-- _ HERMITAGE (PRIVATE STREET) //\, J. s� 6 Ls. ssaa 02 Ezp. 12-31-03 Nog C O N o N L rime 9lF E �P MDS 60%CA • x � � 9-WL a quo w" �n-.aa FAA r Dlo m ATTACHMENT 1 I 02 CIO x \ J sw IZI IP °° rz� \ coy iP y E �« 000 it, t, ��■p{�' `� jngj I I I • • O booed � 103 t 1 00 m 3s j� F1. HP aim '� 4,98 412.B °s ATTACHMENT 2 472.2 �� 05* 473. lk C ti' sti �" FL 6 413.9 \ Qi4} 1 e- v O�s;` _ �,��h ll �'��' 413.1 ,�y os ....473: • � ' • . cP .• T b / 472 p• lk Ro O � d •� 2. \sue 1 d �.•GB•••% • j• Q, / �` os '� ����. �•\ •. - s�� ..•.• � gyp. 472. 472. 4X SP 1� i `'c!` r 4 > 472.7 41 472.7 72• . � � ��s ,(. ti19 5R FG y 412G8 \ `�s 1 MI 4-n B # 51 50 s}1�� �^ •. 4 .96 0C sr 472.2 4113 �. FL 47.2 TW I ��$9 •�47•.•5•- / 471.E iF Z =473.2 _z' F— 2B ` 4l2• 3 P=472.7 LAJ c LaJ FF=4728 �P=471.9 P=472.3 473.2 TW 471.2 V 1 Q; W N 470.8 TF f 471.7 �727 6F=471.9 kO 1 A h \51 � 0.5$X 143, 470.5 =g\;t' Ci46 4 11�p ♦O _ T4ht 4:FQ" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: /O STUDY SESSION: Approval of a Professional Services Contract Amendment No. 2 for General Plan Update PUBLIC HEARING: Consulting Services RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to sign a Professional Services Contract Amendment for consulting services to update the General Plan with Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. and approve the appropriation in an amount not to exceed $18,750. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: A total of $251,099 is budgeted in the Community Development Department's Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Contract Services Account (#101-402-605-000) of which $186,549 is designated for the General Plan Update. The amendment to the contract is additional work and requires the allocation $18,750 from the General Fund Reserves (101-000-300-290). CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the conclusion of a November 16, 1999 General Plan Update Public Hearing, the City Council directed staff to provide additional information regarding land use in adjacent jurisdictions and expand the General Plan Update in the Southeast Planning Area from 64th Avenue to 66th Avenue along the entire south length of the Planning Area. The Contract Amendment No. 2 and the consultant's proposed detailed budget for this work is provided as Attachment 1. Ccfb.GPUcontract Amd#2 105 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize the City Manager to sign a Professional Services Contract Amendment for consulting services to update the General Plan with Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. and approve the appropriation in an amount not to exceed $18,750; or 2. Do not approve the recommendation to appropriate General Fund Reserves and to authorize the City Manager to sign a professional services contract amendment with for consulting services to update the General Plan with Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc.; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 3elelopme'k y Hermn, Community De Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Contract Services Amendment No.2 Ccfb.GPUcontract Amd#2 106 AMENDMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 1 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT This is Amendment 2 to the Contract Services Agreement related to General Plan Update consultant services for the City of La Quinta, California executed on April 21, 1999, is made and entered into by and between the City of La Quinta (the "City") and Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc. (the "Contractor") The parties hereto agree as follows: Contractor shall conduct the scope of services related to the 2' expanded Planning area boundary from the Thermal airport to Highway 111 and 64'h Avenue to 66" Avenue for the General Plan set forth below with attached Scope of Work: TASK # Task Description Task 1 Land Use Planning/Analysis $980.00 Task 2 Geotechnical Assessment, Analysis & Report $1,000.00 Task 3 Cultural Resources Assessment & Element $1,950.00 Task 4 Traffic Impact Analysis $6,000.00 Task 5 CAD Drafting and Mapping $5,000.00 Task 6 Miscellaneous Exhibit Preparation $440.00 Task 7 Map overlay of surrounding jurisdictions $300.00 Task 8 City Council Meeting Attendance $3,080.00 TOTAL $18 750.00 1 For the services rendered pursuant to this Amendment, the Contractor shall be compensated by the City the Amendment amount of Eighteen Thousand and Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($18,750.00) with payment upon completion. The method of payment shall be in accordance with the December 20, 1999 Contract Services Agreement. a Contractor shall complete the scope of services in accordance with the April 21, 1999 Contract Services Agreement. v Z_ Q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the dates stated below: CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation ("CITY") Dated: By: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager City Contract Administrator TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH INC., a California corporation ("CONTRACTOR") Dated: I bila) 0 0 3 Title: Il P M. N Z a uU4 r-I L J TERRA NOVA PLANNING &RESEARCH INC, December 7, 1999 Mr. Fred Baker Principal Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Changes in General Plan Planning Area, extension to 66th Avenue Dear Fred: As you know, we have been asked by the Council to expand the Planning Area for the General Plan from 64th to 66th Avenue, along the entire length of the planning area. All the special studies, with the exception of traffic and noise, were complete prior to the expansion of the boundary. These now need to be amended, particularly as regards exhibits and discussions of liquefaction in the geotechnical report. In addition, Terra Nova has expended funds for base map preparation which are now being duplicated to modify the map. We have attended two City Council meetings which were not planned in our original budget. Finally, the exhibits we had prepared for the MEA, General Plan and EIR must now also be amended. The following details amendments to our budget being requested by Terra Nova and sub - consultants resulting from the change in the Planning Area boundary (the items below are listed under the same categories as our original budget). Task/Budget Category City Council Meetings Land Use Planning/Analysis Geotechnical Assessment, Analysis & Report Cultural Resources Assessment & Element Traffic Impact Analysis CAD Drafting and Mapping Misc. Exhibit Preparation Total Budget Amendment Request Amount $ 700.00 $ 980.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 6,000.00 $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 $ 440.00 $14,070.00 to 16,070.00 109 400 SOUTH FARRELL, SUITE B-205 ❑ PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 ❑ (760) 320-9040 u 0'a Mr. Fred Baker December 7, 1999 Page 2 You requested two additional new budget items, listed below: Attendance at monthly City Council Land Use Workshops (7 months, @ $340.00 each) $ 2,380.00 Preparation of a surrounding land use overlay, based on CVAG and City data already available at mapping company. $ 300.00 As you know, work is proceeding on the mapping effort, in order to keep delays to the project to a minimum. Your prompt review of this letter and attachments is therefore requested. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Nicole Sauviat Criste Principal 110 006 zer)�. Ll j ; K—N t)ec.-Of -77 --:—h r:'ul'I 7Y 7'ff `f JZIP c7d Page ft& ASSOCIATES INC. WORK AUTHORIZATION REQUEST TO: Ms. Nicole Criste FROM: Mr. John Kain, AICP TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RKJK & ASSO-IATES, INC. RESEARCHING 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 400 S. Farrell, Suite B-205 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Palm Springs, CA 92262 DATE: December 7, 1909 JOB NO: 0341-96-06 Subject: La Quinta General Plan Update Contract/Authorization to Proceed on additional traffic analysis services in support of the La Quints General Plan Update. The City has expanded the Planning Area to wdend south from 64' Street to 6e by 1 mile and east by 10 miles. Additional RKJK work tasks include (1) definition of traffic analysis zones over the expanded area, (2) extraction of GIS-based land use data for the new zones, (3) coding of link segments and attributes, and (4) analysis of traffic flows within the expanded area. The original budget for RKJK technical support services to the La Quinta General Plan Update was $34,000. Previous invoices for work during the months of May through 4eptember total $1,427.50. The remaining budget of $32,572.50 will not cover the expanded study aea discussed above. An additional $6,000 is needed to address the expanded study area. Your authorization, in the form of a signed copy of this work authorization to increase our total budget from $34,000 to 40,000 will be necessary for us to complete this work. Bill! ig rates for this job will be based upon the attached Exhibit A. After signing this work authorization, please keep a copy for your files and retum the original to our office. If you have any questions, please give me a call at (949) 474- 0809. Sincerely, RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. JJo n in, JAIP I CONTRACT APPROVAL: Approved by: Title: JK;kgd/l0494 Firm: TERRA NOVA PLANN114G r3< RESEARCH INC. Attachment gate: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • GIS • TRAFFIGACOUSTICAL E 14GINEERING 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Phone: (949) 474-0;109 • Fax: (949) 474-0902 07 DenL 0yi;kKJn Jec-d(-77 01:40Pl9 ^Of9 y47ti(4d7dcyd Page Li ._ EXHIBIT A BILLING RATES FOR RKJK & ASSOCIATES, INIC. Compensation for Services The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows: Position Hourly Rate Principal $120.00 Senior Associate $ 95.00 Associate $ 85.00 Senior Engineer/Planner $ 76.00 Engineer/Planner/Senior Designer $ 65.00 Assistant Engineer/Planner $ 55.00 Senior Technician $ 50.00 Engineering Technician Il $ 40.00 Engineering Technician 1 $ 35.00 Engineering Aide $ 30.00 Administrative Assistant $ 40.00 Administrative Aide $ 35.00 Clerical Aide $ 30.00 General (1) Reimbursable direct costs, such as reproduction, supplies, messenger sevice, long-distance tele- phone calls, travel and traffic counts will be billed at cost plus ten (10) percent. (2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work, the above rates may be increased 50 percent. (a) Client payment for profamicnal services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from other panties. (4) Baling statements for work will be submitted monthly. Statements are payable within thirty (30) days of the receipt by client of statement. Any statement unpaid after ihlrty (30) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law. April 20,1999 1,1.2 vU, GBWnfoonirnafionsyserns Post -it- Fax Note 7671 0' 1409106107 To Necolt Cr.y{-a Froo Dtn1St C 1.•-+c C0'O°a"rerrq WcN4 CO' Imo . r FAYtE760,-i-X2.-,.ibP aY0 112 first street redlands, colifornic 92373 (909) 793-9493 fox (909) 798-4430 MEMORANDUM To: Nicole Sauviate Criste, Terra Nova Planning & Research Inc. From: Denise Cline, Aerial Information Systems Date: December 2, 1999 Subject: Project 36400 City of La Quinte General Plan Mapping/Automation Cost Estimate for Additional Work Requested Per our telephone conversation of November 19, 1999, we have reviewed the work requirements to complete the additional tasks requested for the City of La Quinta General Plan mapping project. REQUEST 1 — Tasks to include the following items: • Add approximately 10.5 square miles to the Planning Area • Revise the Exhibit Base with added Planning Area • Map/automate Existing General Plan in added area • Revise Existing General Plan per City Council recommendations « Revise Recommended General Plan per City Council recommendations • Create revised Existing General Plan plot • Create revised Recommended Alternative plot PhotointerpreVmap/automate Existing Land Use in added area • Create revised table for Vacant vs Developed land uses The estimated cost to complete these tasks is $3,000 to $5,000. The actual cost is dependent on the extent and complexity of revisions to the current General Plan database. REQUEST 2 — Tasks to include the following items: • Create a wall -sized mylar overlay plot depicting General Plan land use data for the jurisdictions adjacent to the City of La Quinta The estimated cost to complete this task is $300. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this information (900) 793-94393. AERIAL WRORMATION 8TSTBM6, INC. 112 FIRST 8TRIW REOLANK CA mrt (9 0) 7994423 FAX: (ale) 7f -UN 402 I'a ► 9 009 3i Earth Consultants International To: Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. 400 South Farrel Drive, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, California 92262 Attention: Ms. Nicole Criste Project No. 998108-001 November 19, 1999 Subject: Supplemental, Technical Background Report to the Safety Element of the General Plan for the City of La Quinta Planning Area, Riverside County, California This supplemental is in response to our telephone conversations of November 18 and 19, 1999, regarding increasing the Planning Area for the La Quinta project. This second areal increase extends the planning area south by one mile, from 64"' Avenue to 66" Avenue, and from Adams Street on the west, to the Southern Pacific railroad tracks on the east. As before, we will have no probiem incorporating these additional 10 square miles into our analysis. To address this change in scope we will review the report that we already prepared to make sure that the text is internally consistent and addresses the new area. Where appropriate new text will be developed or changed. The graphics will be re -done to show the new area in the general plan, and to extend the limits of the mapped hazards into this zone. With the exception of the geology and wind hazard maps, the new maps will be simple to update. We estimate that the cost of incorporating and addressing the new area into the Technical Background Report is One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). If this is acceptable to you, please sign the two copies of the attached Supplemental Scope of Work Authorization and send them back to us. We will sign the forms, and send you back an original of the executed contract for your files. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, Tapia onzalez Project Manager 2522 North Santiago Boulevard, Suite B 0 Orange 0 California Q Telephone: (714) 282-6123 (J� Facsimile: (714) 998-0971 tgonzalez@ earthconsultants.com 0 www.earthconsultants.com 92867 114 0 L o CRM TECH 2411 Sunset Drive Riverside, CA 92506 Nicole S. Criste Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. 400 S. Farrell, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, CA 92262 November 19, 1999 COST PROPOSAL AND SCOPE OF WORK Cultural Resources Element City of La Quinta General Plan South Addendum At the request of Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., CRM TECH is submitting this cost proposal and scope of work concerning the research for and the composition of the cultural resources element of the City of La Quinta's south addendum to the planning area for the proposed new general plan. The cultural resources element will provide a comprehensive inventory and summary of existing data on known cultural resources within the addendum area and a one - mile buffer zone around the addendum area. The results will be incorporated into the general plan study already in progress by CRM TECH for Terra Nova Planning and Reseaerch, Inc. Scope of Work In order to achieve the objectives outlined above, CRM TECH proposes to accomplish the following tasks: 1. Update a previously completed historical/archaeological records search at the Eastern Information Center, U.C. Riverside, for a current inventory of known cultural resources within the addendum area. 2. Pursue further historical research on the addendum area using early maps and existing literature in local and regional history. 3. Perform ethnohistorical literature review regarding Native American sites and places within the addendum area. 4. Perform a reconnaissance -level (windshield) field inspection of known cultural resources in order to examine their current conditions. 5. Incorporate findings into in -progress cultural resources study for La Quinta general plan. Cost Proposal I. Records search update $300.00 2. Historical research $300.00 3. Ethnohistorical research $450.00 4. Field inspection $300.00 5. Report preparation $600.00 Total $1,950.00 Tel 909 784 3051 Fax 909 784 2987 Cell 909 315 1157 Payment Schedule The entire amount will be due and payable upon submission of the final report. Project Schedule Start date: Immediately upon authorization to proceed. Completion of study: To be coordinated with Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. Agreement If Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc., agrees to the terms and conditions of this proposal, an authorized signature below will constitute a contract and an agreement to proceed. Respectfully submitted: Bruce Love, Principal CRM TECH Agreed to: Print name and title Signature Date Titit 4 4Qut«tw AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR: February 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the Community PUBLIC HEARING: Safety Manager and a Code Compliance Officer to attend a Training Class Given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., Commerce, CA , February 25 and 26, 2000 Approve authorization for the overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager and a Code Compliance Officer to attend a training class given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Commerce, CA , on February 25 and 26, 2000. The training will be funded from Travel, Training and Meetings Account #101-352- 637-000. The breakdown of estimated expenditures for this class is as follows: • Registration $ 200 • Meals 100 • Travel 100 • Hotel 200 Total $ 600 This course will improve the skills and abilities of the Community Safety Manager and Code Compliance Officer in the performance of their duties and ensure that our Code Compliance Department is operating within all legal requirements. Please see the attached page for course titles (Attachment 1). 117 The alternatives available to the City Council are: Approve authorization for the overnight travel for the Community Safety Manager and a Code Compliance Officer to attend a training class given by Southern California Association of Code Enforcement Officials, Inc., in Commerce, CA , on February 25 and 26, 2000; or 2. Do not approve the request for overnight travel; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Building Ad Safety Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Announcement showing class subjects 002 ad OC W Z ,0 V Q 3 Z W V SD: W N W co W pp- o r ^ . J - ATTACHMENT 1 0 o 0 h W O O 0 .O- C N O 6 U ! CSf 'Q` OCw/) U cc V O d '.. U) E n O V, L.o IL = c�U a)c3r- a) �_ _d N o Q c° �. C °m' m 'M E .s a� cm ia� ��� V o ° -Oc cn v O m co •a) • to �[ C y V "•_' O I� >' N d U Gi T 00 n Q co U) ca C U) co cB s Lj co H9 c ti W (1) a) U) a) a) ccz w ( ) • C C CD.n'. 3 o is D E a) o d cC d Q NO •� CD N • � cm 'C a) E o E c � $ E o >. E U) L.O a) � CL z a 0)� o . S - a) C C d p N a) N a) W T N Lfl •� '� d cc V _ a) O d O ' y.� v N U j W � U a V Q E Q Q vNi co ti E c0 a� a E �o o 7 -p O coCCa. O c� O a) O= LL U J LL m a N ) El co N �' H W F- in � a, �' a) a a) E a) Mno a�i CO vC) O cn O v � a Z cr Cccc a _ C _T z P Q (,� ._ V LL Cn .E :J Li v .0 Lr y J � L ; •" � tl L U r V J _ J V � 11 �1 04 T4'!t 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: 41 ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Acceptance of Covered Parking for the Senior Center - Project 99-13 and Authorization PUBLIC HEARING: for City Clerk to Record Notice of Completion Accept Project 99-13 and instruct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. None. None for this action. The prevailing wage and bonding requirements were waived for the Project to encourage favorable bids. All work for Project 99-13 (Senior Center Covered Parking) has been completed in accordance with the specifications. Accept Project 99-13 and instruct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. All work has been completed to specifications. There is no alternative but to accept the project. Respectfully submitted, Tom Hartung, Direc or of Building & Safety /Apov d for submissi n b . ZAIV-X�� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 1^0 Td4t 4 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the City's Intent to Order the Construction of Certain Improvements and to Form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements), a Resolution Preliminarily Adopting, Confirming, and Approving the Engineer's Report and Appointing a Time and Place for Hearing Protest to Improvements in the Proposed Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements), and Approve the Plans and Specifications and Authorize Staff to Bid the Improvements for the Phase VI Project AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: L Adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring its intention to order the construction of certain improvements and to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements); and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to preliminarily adopt the Engineer's Report and appoint the time and place for hearing protests; and Approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff to bid the Phase VI Improvements project; and Approve the Redevelopment Agency's petition preference for improvements in Area A, Village Commercial Area and in Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, Saguaro Area. All of the costs for the street improvements including curb and gutter, new street surfacing and storm drain, will be funded through the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Project Area No. 1 and No. 2. RDA Project Area No. 1 funding will fund street improvements for the Village Commercial area, which includes Avenida Montezuma around the existing Francis Hack Park, Calle Estado, Avenida La Fonda (from Desert Club Drive to Avenida Bermudas), and the Cove Residential area bounded by Calle Sinaloa, Eisenhower Drive, Calle Tampico, and Washington Street. 121 ` E T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd RDA Project Area No. 2 funding will finance the Westward Ho street Improvements east and west of Jefferson Street, north of the Whitewater Channel, south of Westward Ho Drive and east of Roadrunner Lane including Vista Grande, and improvements to Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro. Improvements are proposed to the existing water system within the Village Commercial area, the Village Residential area, and Westward Ho. These improvements will be funded entirely by Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The other items of work include proposed public sewer in all areas and proposed undergrounding of the utilities within the Village Commercial area, Saguaro, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Westward Ho. In addition, there is a proposed perimeter wall fronting Saguaro, Sagebrush, and Bottlebrush. All costs associated with the construction, bond issuance, debt service, trust agreement, and administrative expense for the public sewer, utility underground, and proposed perimeter wall will be borne by the property owners benefitting from the improvements within Assessment District No. 2000-1 boundaries. These improvements are being partially funded by RDA funds and therefore must be bid specifying prevailing wage requirements. Therefore, there are no Charter City impacts. On July 7, 1998, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 1998/1999 through 2002/2003 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). As part of this program, the Phase VI Improvements were identified as follows: Phase VI A - Village Commercial Area Phase VI B - Cove Area Phase VI C - Westward Ho Phase VI D - Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, and Saguaro The City Council also approved the project entitled "Village Development" which is the completion of a prototypical street (Calle Estado). On August 18, 1998, the City Council authorized the advertisement for Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide design and assessment engineering services in order to complete the Phase VI projects. On December 15, 1998, the City Council awarded the design and assessment engineering services contract to Korve Engineering. On February 2, 1999, City Council approved the conceptual plan for procteding with } obtaining public input toward the improvements for the Phase VI improvements. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCII\2000\000215a.wpd 002 On March 1, 1999, there was a Public Meeting with the Village residential and commercial property owners to discuss the prototypical street and other improvements within the Village and Cove area. On June 22, 1999, the City Council conducted a Study Session to begin the task of reviewing proposed concepts for the prototypical street and the conceptual circulation plan for the Village commercial and residential areas. On August 3, 1999, the City Council conducted a second Study Session to review concepts for the prototypical street and the conceptual circulation plan for the Village commercial and residential areas. On October 19, 1999, the City Council approved the following: the village circulation concept, 28 foot street widths and rolled curb for certain residential areas in the village, a conceptual plan for the prototypical street, Calle Estado; a parking lot plan for the parking lot south of Calle Tampico between Avenida Navarro and Avenida Bermudas; and a streetlight standard to be utilized for the prototypical street. On November 18, 1999, there was a Public Meeting conducted with the residents of Westward Ho in order to discuss the proposed improvements for the Westward Ho area. Approximately 28 residents attended this meeting out of approximately 180 homes. During that meeting, the residents stated their desire for street widths of less than 36 foot curb to curb, and the utilization of a modified rolled curb to maintain the neighborhood's rural atmosphere. The residents also expressed an interest in having overhead utilities undergrounded. According to Bond Counsel and the Assessment Engineer, a petition is required with signatures of property owners that own more than 50% of the land mass in order to form an undergrounding district for utilities. On January 20, 2000, a workshop was conducted with residents of Saguaro, Sagebrush, and Bottlebrush in regard to proposed improvements and assessment district in their area. Approximately 25 residents attended out of a total of 126 parcels in this area and were informed of the proposed assessment for each parcel for sewer, utility underground, and a perimeter wall fronting Washington Street. The estimated assessment was for each parcel was shown to the residents on four identical maps situated around the room. Included as Attachment 1 is a petition/survey form showing the residents' support for the assessment district and improvements. A representative from Korve also visited residents door to door to explain the proposed improvements and assessments and circulated the petition/survey form. lit T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd 003 The petition/survey forms completed for Saguaro, Sagebrush, and Bottlebrush indicate: Sewer Imnrovements TOTAL PARCELS PETITIONS RECEIVED IN FAVOR OPPOSED % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 125 54 42 8 77.8% 14.8% Perimeter Wall TOTAL PARCELS PETITIONS RECEIVED IN FAVOR OPPOSED % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 125 54 40 5 74.1 % 9.3% Underaround Utilitv Conversions % OF LAND % OF MASS LAND TOTAL TOTAL LAND IN MASS TOTAL LAND PETITIONS MASS IN FAVOR OPPOSED PARCELS MASS RECEIVED REPRESENTED FAVOR OPPOSED (TOTAL) (TOTAL) (0) (0) 123 1 605,000 1 54 1 270,000 105,000 50,000 17.4% 8.3% In addition to the proposed assessments, the residents requested that both Bottlebrush and Saguaro end in cul-de-sacs as opposed to connecting with a frontage road. Each street is approximately 1,200 feet long. The current zoning ordinance establishes a maximum distance of 660 feet for a cul-de-sac. Korve Engineers have contacted the Fire Marshall regarding the maximum length of a cul-de-sac. The Fire Marshall's Office indicated that 1,320 feet is the maximum for fire protection. On January 25, 2000, a workshop was conducted for the commercial and residential property owners of the Village. Included as Attachment 2 is a petition/survey form that was circulated during that workshop indicating the business owners' and residential property owners' interest in forming assessment districts for sewer. The commercial property owners also were provided the opportunity for undergrounding utilities in the commercial area. Representatives of Korve have also contacted the commercial and residential property owners that did not attend the workshop to explain the proposed improvements and assessments and circulate the petition. The petition/survey forms completed for the commercial and residential property owners of the Village indicate: Commercial Sewer Imnrovements TOTAL PARCELS PETITIONS RECEIVED IN FAVOR OPPOSED % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 92 18 16 2 88.9 % 1 1 .1 % 124 T:\PWDEM000NCII\2000\000215a.wpd 004 Commercial Underaround Utilitv Conversions % OF LAND % OF MASS LAND TOTAL TOTAL LAND IN MASS TOTAL LAND PETITIONS MASS IN FAVOR OPPOSED PARCELS MASS (0) RECEIVED REPRESENTED FAVOR OPPOSED (TOTAL) (TOTAL) (sf) 127 2,009,154 1 24 1 200,104 1 137,381 1 62,723 1 6.8% 1 3.1 % Residential Sewer Improvements TOTAL PARCELS PETITIONS RECEIVED IN FAVOR OPPOSED % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 270 13 13 0 100.0% 0.0% On January 27, 2000, a workshop was conducted for the property owners in the Westward Ho area. Included as Attachment 3 is a petition/survey form that was circulated during that workshop to ascertain the residential property owners' support for forming an assessment district for public sewers and undergrounding the utilities. City staff and a representative of Korve also met with property owners during the day on January 21, 2000 to circulate the petition/survey forms prior to the meeting. The petition/survey forms completed for the Westward Ho area indicate: Sewer ImDrovements TOTAL PARCELS PETITIONS RECEIVED IN FAVOR OPPOSED % IN FAVOR % OPPOSED 135 70 68 2 97.1 % 2.9% Underaround Utilitv Conversions % OF LAND % OF MASS LAND TOTAL TOTAL LAND IN MASS TOTAL LAND PETITIONS MASS IN FAVOR FAVOR OPPOSED PARCELS MASS (sf) RECEIVED REPRESENTED OPPOSED (TOTAL) (TOTAL) (sf) 127 2,732,883 1 50 1 1,488,718 1,205,374 22,650 1 44.1 % 0.8% During the City Council meeting staff will provide an update of all areas based upon additional petitions received since the preparation of this report. T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd 0©5 The purpose of an Assessment District is to enable the property owners to pay for public improvements in accordance with City and State policies. A bond issue would be sold to raise funds to pay for the public improvements. The bonds are for fifteen years, which would require the property owners to make payments through their semiannual County Property Tax payments. The amounts collected by the County would be forwarded to the City, which in turn would pay the Bond Trustee the annual debt service payments. The yearly payments assessed, for the public sewers, to the property owners in the proposed districts varies per parcel, but on the average, are estimated within the range as follows: Phase VI A (Village Commercial Area) $208.22 - $5,385.25/annually Phase VI B (Village Residential Area) $526.30 - $ 633.57/annually Phase VI C (Westward Ho) $470.39 - $3,292.70/annually Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro) $120.35 - $ 385.41 /annually The property owner may pay the public sewer assessment in one estimated lump sum range as follows: Phase VI A (Village Commercial Area) $1,983.10 - $51,288.05 Phase VI B (Village Residential Area) $5,012.38 - $ 6,034.04 Phase VI C (Westward Ho) $4,463.28 - $31,242.98 Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro) $1,141.84 - $ 3,656.89 The yearly payments assessed, for the utility undergrounding, to the property owners in the proposed districts varies per parcel, but on the average, are estimated within the range as follows: Phase VI A (Village Commercial Area) $219.38 - $5,221.32/annually Phase VI C (Westward Ho) $552.59 - $4,973.33/annually Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro)$191.24 - $ 615.75/annually The property owner may pay the utility undergrounding assessment in one estimated lump sum range as follows: Phase VI A (Village Commercial Area) $2,089.36 - $49,726.84 Phase VI C (Westward Ho) $5,243.31 - $47,189.76 Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro)$1,814.59 - $ 9,237.22 The yearly payments assessed, for the perimeter wall, to the property owners in the proposed district are estimated as follows: Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro) $128.46/annually The property owner may pay the assessment in one lump sum as follows: Phase VI D (Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro) $1,218.75 006 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd The payment would be a lien on the property and the City would be required to commence foreclosure procedures against the property owner who becomes delinquent on a payment. The bonds are not debts of the City from a legal standpoint; however, the City is required to provide administrative oversight for the life of the bond. If the City Council moves forward with creation of the assessment district, the first step is to declare the City's intention to order the construction of certain improvements and perform Assessment District No. 2000-1. The second step is to approve the Engineer's Report and set a time and place for the protest hearing. The resolution establishes the Public Hearing and Ballot Count for April 18, 2000. Although it is not a requirement, it has been recommended by Mr. Bill Marticorena of Rutan and Tucker, Bond Counsel, to hold a public meeting on March 21, 2000, (prior to the public hearing) to provide additional opportunity for community input. This Public Meeting will provide the residents an additional opportunity to address the council with their questions and concerns. Step three would be to approve plans and specifications and authorize bids. A bid opening is anticipated on April 6, 2000. The bid opening is scheduled to occur prior to the April 18, 2000 proposed Public Hearing and Ballot Count. This is to provide actual numbers and to verify the estimate utilized in the Engineer's Report that establish assessments. If the bids are lower than the assessments, the assessments may be adjusted accordingly prior to placement on the tax rolls. If the bids are higher, then the City Council may wish to adjust the costs of the assessment spread and begin the process of a new assessment ballot, or identify other funding to compensate for the shortfall. The bid is structured so the City Council may award all or parts of the bid, or may reject all bids depending on the outcome of the Public Hearing and Ballot Count. The preliminary schedule indicates that Ballots will be mailed to the property owners no later than March 3, 2000. The Public Hearing to count ballots and establish assessments may not occur until a forty-five(45) day time period has ended from the date of the Ballot mailings. The Public Hearing is scheduled for April 18, 2000. With this schedule, an acceptable bid, and a positive assessment vote, Notice to Proceed for construction is anticipated by the end of June, 2000. The City of La Quinta, Redevelopment Agency (RDA) owns thirteen 0 3) lots within the Village Commercial and Residential Area. Of these lots, ten (10) show a proposed sewer assessment totaling $45,287.44, and three (3) lots show a proposed Utility Undergrounding Assessment totaling $40,143.62. Included as Attachment 4 is.a Petition/Survey form for the RDA to indicate the RDA's support for the proposed assessments on RDA property. City Staff is requesting the RDA's preference regarding the proposed assessments. 12, 007 T:\PWDEFRCOUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd The City of La Quinta RDA owns three (3) lots within the Saguaro, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush Area. Three (3) lots show proposed sewer assessments totaling $7,313.78, three (3) lots show a proposed Utility Undergrounding Assessments totaling $7,258.34, and three (3) show proposed Perimeter Wall assessments totaling $2,437.50. Included as Attachment 5 is a Petition/Survey form for the RDA to indicate the RDA's support for the proposed assessments on RDA property. City Staff is requesting the RDA's preference regarding the proposed assessments. The proposed Assessment District is a singular area wide District comprised of four zones identified as follows: Zone A - Village Commercial Area Zone B - Village Residential Area Zone C - Westward Ho Zone D - Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro If more than 50% of the Ballots received within the area wide Assessment District are in favor of the Assessment District, then the City may form the Assessment District for the improvements. Some zones may be overwhelmingly supportive of the proposed Assessment District and some may be overwhelmingly opposed. But if the overall Ballots received indicate over 50% support, then the Assessment District may be formed for all zones. If more than 50% of the overall Ballots received indicate opposition, but some zones show overwhelming support, the Assessment District will fail. The City Council may then decide to direct City Staff and the Assessment Engineer to reconfigure the Assessment Engineers report and begin the process of attempting to form a smaller Assessment District for the zones that originally showed support in the first Ballot. This would increase the costs of the proposed assessments since the soft costs would be spread over less properties. The public sewer and perimeter wall assessment votes are spread to each dwelling unit receiving benefit. The utility undergrounding assessment is based on land mass. This report has been reviewed by Mr. Bill Marticorena and Mr. Stan Wolcott of Rutan and Tucker, Bond Counsel, for the Phase VI Assessment District. The Engineer's Report for Assessment District No. 2000-1 is provided as Attachment 6. T:\PW DEPTICOUNCIL\2000\000215a.wpd The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring its intention to order the construction of certain improvements and to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements); and adopt a Resolution of the City Council to preliminarily adopt the Engineer's Report and appoint the time and place for hearing protests; and approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff to bid the Phase VI Improvements project; and approve the Redevelopment Agency's petition preference for improvements in Area A, Village Commercial Area and in Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, Saguaro Area. or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council declaring its intention to order the construction of certain improvements and to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements); and do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to preliminarily adopt the Engineer's Report and appoint the time and place for hearing protests; and do not approve the plans and specifications and authorize staff to bid the Phase VI Improvements project; and do not approve the Redevelopment Agency's petition preference for improvements in Area A, Village Commercial Area and in Area D, Sagebrush, Bottlebrush, Saguaro Area. or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectf y bmit , gg,Reublsic A. Vogt Works Director/City Engineer Ap rove for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Sagebrush/Bottlebrush/Saguaro Petition/Survey 2. Village Commercial and Residential Petition/Survey 3. Westward Ho Petition/Survey 4. Petition/Survey Form for the RDA Village Property 5. Petition/Survey Form for the RDA Saguaro/Sagebrush/Bottlebrush property 6. Engineer's Report, Assessment District No. 2000-1 .112 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\2000\OOO215a.wpd RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Section 5896 5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, at least 5 owners of more than 50 percent in area of the property subject to assessment for the proposed construction of certain improvements hereinafter described (the "Improvements") have petitioned for the construction in proceedings to be taken by the City Council of the City of La Quinta (herein referred to as the "City") pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (herein referred to as the "1913 Act") and for the issuance of bonds in the proceedings under the Improvement Bonds Act of 1915 (the "1915 Act") (collectively the "Acts"); and WHEREAS, all proceedings required by the provisions of Division 4 of said Streets and Highways Code (being the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitations, and Majority Protest Act of 1931, Streets and Highways Code Sections 2800-3012) (the "1931 Act") will be complied with pursuant to the Alternative Proceeding's provisions of Sections 2960 et seq. thereof; and WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council that an assessment district should be formed to finance the installation of said improvements under the provisions of the Acts; and WHEREAS, the proposed territory and boundaries of such assessment district are shown on a map, which map is designate "Boundary Map for Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI) (herein referred to as "Map"), has been presented to the City Council for approval and is on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, Willdan Associates, the Engineer of Work (the "Engineer of Work"), is competent to make and has filed with the City Clerk the report with regard to the Improvements, which report is required by the Acts to be made and filed; and WHEREAS, before ordering the Improvements, the City Council is required, under the Acts, to adopt a resolution declaring its intention to do so. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: I T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1\REVOrderofConstructionResolution.wpd 010 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity require the construction of the Improvements, as hereinafter described and this City Council hereby declares its intention to order the Improvements and to form an assessment district covering the real property benefited by said Improvements. SECTION 2. The proposed assessment district shall be designated "Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements). SECTION 3. The Map, which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in said proposed assessment district, and the individual zones thereof, is hereby declared to describe the proposed boundaries of "Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements)," and shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. SECTION 4. The Clerk of the City is hereby directed to endorse her certificate on the original of the Map evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution and to file said Map in her office, and to file a copy of said Map so endorsed with the County Recorder of Riverside County, California within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the resolution fixing the time and place of hearing on the formation and extent of the assessment district. SECTION 5. The Improvements which the City Council intends to order are the construction of certain underground utility system improvements, appurtenances, right-of-way improvements, and all appurtenant work in connection therewith in certain streets and other public easements as provided in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 6. Pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California, parcels within the assessment district that are owned or used by any local agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment, unless it can be demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that such publicly -owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit from the Improvements. SECTION 7. Notice is hereby given that serial bonds to represent unpaid assessments, which bear interest at a fixed or variable interest rate of not to exceed twelve percent per annum or such higher maximum interest rate of not to exceed twelve percent per annum or such higher maximum interest rate as may be permitted by law, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided in Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code (the Improvement Bond Act of 1915) and the last installment of such bonds shall mature in not to exceed 39 years from the second of September next succeeding 12 months from their date. The alternate procedure for collecting assessments and advance retirement of bonds as set forth in Part 1 1.1 of Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code shall apply herein. Pursuant to Section 8650.1 of said Code, the City Council may determine to issue said bonds so that other than an equal annual proportion of the principal amount shall mature each year. 131' T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1\REVOrderofConstructionResolution.wpd Oil SECTION 8. The City Council further hereby declares that it is its intention to covenant that, upon default of certain assessment payments due (except under circumstances to be specified in the resolution issuing the bonds or a related resolution), it will commence foreclosure proceedings to be commenced by November 1 of each year, as permitted by Section 8830(b) of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 9. The City Council further declares that it is its intention to create a special reserve fund to provide for the purchase of tax delinquent property by the City and for other advances contemplated to be made by the City under Part 13 of Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 10. The City Council hereby finds and determines that if the assessment proposed herein results in a surplus in the improvement fund to be provided for in the proceedings hereafter taken pursuant to this resolution, after the Improvements are constructed, the surplus shall be applied as a credit on the assessment, unless the City Council hereafter otherwise provides by resolution, all in accordance with the provisions of Section 10427 to 10427.2, inclusive, of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 11. Whenever, in the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 or in the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, a notice, resolution, order or matter relative to said proceedings for the work, acquisitions and improvements in said assessment district is required to be published, the City Clerk is hereby ordered to publish such notice, resolution or other matter in the Desert Sun which is hereby selected by the City Council for that purpose. SECTION 12. The City Council hereby appoints Willdan Associates, as the Engineer of Work, refers to the proposed construction and acquisitions to the Engineer of Work and directs the Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk a report in writing containing the matters specified in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 13. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8769, this City Council hereby determines that the City will not obligate itself to advance available funds from the City Treasury to cure any deficiency which -may occur in the Redemption Fund; provided, however, this determination shall not prevent the City from, in its sole discretion, advancing funds for such purpose as otherwise provided in the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. SECTION 14. The City Council further declares that the bonds issued for Assessment District 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) shall be refundable in accordance with the provisions of the "Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds." T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1\REVOrderofConstructionResolution.wpd SECTION 15. Pursuant to the provision of the authority granted by the Acts, the City Council hereby determines and declares that, in its opinion, the public interest will not be served by allowing any owner of property located within the assessment district to be awarded any contract to be let under this proceeding and said property owners shall not be awarded any such contracts. SECTION 16. The City Council further declares that it is its intention to enter into agreements with certain public agencies and private utilities pursuant to Section 5896.9 of the Streets and Highways Code, regarding the construction and installation of the Improvements, the cost of which shall be assessed upon the real property benefiting therefrom and title to which shall vest, upon completion, in said public utilities. SECTION 17. The Engineer of Record is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a report and take the other actions required pursuant to Section 2961 of the 1931 Act. SECTION 18. Appropriate staff of the City is hereby authorized and directed to take such acts in furtherance of this resolution as may be necessary to accomplish the proceedings initiated herein. The costs of such actions, if any, shall be advanced from the General Fund of the City or the City Redevelopment Capital Improvement Funds. Such advances, if any, shall be reimbursed to the General Fund from the proceeds of bonds to be issued hereunder. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the city of La Quinta at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of February, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: John J. Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California T:\PWDEPT\PROJ ECTS\88Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AsaessmentD2000-1 \REV OrderofConstructionResolution.wpd 013 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dawn C. Honeywell, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 1.34 01.1. 11. T:\PWDEFRPROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1 \REV OrderofConstructionResolution. wpd STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy as adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2000. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 13t T:\PWDEPT\PROJ ECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AsaesamentD2000-1 \REV OrderofConstmctionResolution.wpd 015 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, PRELIMINARILY ADOPTING, CONFIRMING AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND APPOINTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS TO IMPROVEMENTS IN PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta by Resolution No. heretofore adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2000, declared its intention to make the improvements in Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "Assessment District"), therein described; and WHEREAS, the City Council in and by the resolution referred the proposed improvements to the Engineer of Work (the "Engineer"), and directed the Engineer to make and file with the City Council a report containing the matters specified in Section 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has on this date filed with the Clerk of the City his report in writing containing the matters specified in Section 10204 of Streets and Highways Code, including the following: (a) Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements if the improvements are not already installed; (b) A general description of the property necessary or convenient for the operation of the work and improvements and of the property to be acquired as a part of the improvements; (c) An estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements and acquisitions and incidental expenses in connection therewith; . (d) A diagram showing the Assessment District, and zones thereof, and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of land within the assessment district as they existed at the time of passage of the resolution, each of which subdivisions has been given a separate number upon the diagram, and showing the relative location of the parcels of land to the work proposed to be done and the improvements to be made; (e) A proposed assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the improvements distributed and allocated upon the several subdivisions of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from the improvements. 13t_ 016 T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\88Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000.1 \Engineer'sReportResolution consideration and has been fully considered by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. The report, including the plans, specifications, general descriptions, estimate of the cost of acquisitions and improvements and incidental expenses in connection therewith, diagram and proposed assessment, are hereby preliminarily adopted, confirmed and approved. 2. Tuesday, the 21 st of March, 2000, at 3:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, at the Council Chambers of the City Council, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for a public meeting by the City Council on the question of the formation of the Assessment District. 3. Tuesday, the 18th of April, 2000, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, at the Council Chambers of the City Council, located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, is hereby fixed as the time and place for hearing protests to the proposed improvements and/or acquisitions. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913, ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO FILE A PROTEST AS DESCRIBED BELOW. IN ADDITION, EACH RECORD OWNER OF PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED HAS THE RIGHT UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIIIC OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO SUBMIT A BALLOT IN FAVOR OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED WORK, OR ASSESSMENT, OR EXTENT OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, OR TO THE PROPOSED GRADES, MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER. PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. � sq" T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1\Engineer'sReportResolution 017 IF A WRITTEN PROTEST IS FILED BY OWNERS OF MORE THAN ONE-HALF OF THE AREA OF LAND TO BE ASSESSED, NO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, UNLESS THE PROTESTS ARE OVERRULED BY AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF 4/5'S OF THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIRE THE IMPROVEMENTS. BALLOTS WILL BE MAILED TO THE RECORD OWNER OF EACH PARCEL LOCATED WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SUBJECT TO A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. EACH SUCH OWNER MAY COMPLETE SUCH BALLOT AND THEREBY INDICATE THEIR SUPPORT OR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT. ALL SUCH BALLOTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS AT OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 A POSTMARK PRIOR TO SUCH DATE AND TIME WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT IF NOT RECEIVED THEREBY. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CAUSE THE BALLOTS TIMELY RECEIVED TO BE TABULATED. IF A MAJORITY PROTEST EXISTS, THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL NOT IMPOSE AN ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OR A PARTICULAR ZONE THEREOF. A MAJORITY PROTEST EXISTS IF, UPON THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING, BALLOTS SUBMITTED IN OPPOSITION TO THE ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OR A PARTICULAR ZONE THEREOF EXCEED THE BALLOTS SUBMITTED IN FAVOR OF SUCH ASSESSMENT OR A PARTICULAR ZONE THEREOF. IN TABULATING THE BALLOTS, THE BALLOTS SHALL BE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THE PROPORTIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OF THE AFFECTED PROPERTY. 5. The City Clerk is directed to cause notice of the hearing for protests to be mailed in accordance with Section 10301 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Government Code Section 54954.6. J39 n�R T:\PWDEPT\PROJECTS\98Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1 \Eng ineer'sReportResolution 6. The Boundary Map for the Assessment District is hereby approved and the Superintendent of Streets (Director of Public Works) and City Clerk are hereby directed to record said map in the records of the Riverside County Recorder's Office as required by Streets and Highways Code Section 3113. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the city of La Quinta at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of February, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: John J. Pena, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dawn C. Honeywell, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California T:T WDEPT\PROJECTS\88PrjctslPhaseVAssDstkAsseamentD2000-11Engineer'sReportResolution STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF LA QUINTA 1 I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy as adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2000. Dated: June S. Greek, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 140 0 6. T:\PWDEPT\PROJ ECTS\88Prjcts\PhaseVAssDst\AssessmentD2000-1 \Engineer'sReportReeolution ATTACHMENT 1 PETITION FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) AREA D - SAGEBRUSH / BOTTLEBRUSH / SAGUARO We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of La Quinta ( the "C40 pursuant to Part 7.5 of the Special Assessment Investigations, Limitation and Majority Protest Act ("1931 Act'), and Section 5896.5 of the Streets and Highways Code to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District'), and one or more zones of benefit thereof, for the purpose of construction and/or acquiring certain public improvements including, without limitation, sewers, underground utilities, perimeter walls, and the underground conversion of certain overhead utilities (the Project'). A brief description of the Project and an estimate of the total costs of the Project to be financed by the District, broken down by proposed zones of benefit, is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The boundaries of the District shall be those referred to in a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the District, and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the District. By executing this Petition, you are indicating your desire that the City Council commence proceedings to form the District, conduct appropriate legal proceedings and elections relating thereto, and if properly approved, commence the Project and issue bonds for the financing thereof. The District may be formed with one or more zones of benefit and the improvements and the assessments contained in all zones of benefit may or may not be equivalent. By executing this Petition, you are requesting that the improvements described herein, including the utility undergrounding conversion, if applicable, be performed as provided by Streets and Highways Code Section 5896.5. In addition to the execution of this Petition in the place provided herein, please indicate which, if any, categories of improvements you are requesting by checking the appropriate box or boxes. The specific description of the improvements mentioned below and their estimated costs for your zone of benefit can be located on Exhibit A hereto: ❑ Sewer Improvements. ❑ Underground Utility Conversions. ❑ Perimeter Wall. Signature Printed Name Address Telephone Number i4A. 022 ATTACHMENT 2 PETITION FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) AREA A - VILLAGE We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of La Quinta ( the "City') pursuant to Part 7.5 of the Special Assessment Investigations, Limitation and Majority Protest Act ("1931 Act"), and Section 5896.5 of the Streets and Highways Code to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District"), and one or more zones of benefit thereof, for the purpose of construction and/or acquiring certain public improvements including, without limitation, sewers, underground utilities, perimeter walls, and the underground conversion of certain overhead utilities (the Project'). A brief description of the Project and an estimate of the total costs of the Project to be financed by the District, broken down by proposed zones of benefit, is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The boundaries of the District shall be those referred to in a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the District, and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the District. By executing this Petition, you are indicating your desire that the City Council commence proceedings to form the District, conduct appropriate legal proceedings and elections relating thereto, and if properly approved, commence the Project and issue bonds for the financing thereof. The District may be formed with one or more zones of benefit and the improvements and the assessments contained in all zones of benefit may or may not be equivalent. By executing this Petition, you are requesting that the improvements described herein, including the utility undergrounding conversion, if applicable, be performed as provided by Streets and Highways Code Section 5896.5. In addition to the execution of this Petition in the place provided herein, please indicate which, if any, categories of improvements you are requesting by checking the appropriate box or boxes. The specific description of the improvements mentioned below and their estimated costs for your zone of benefit can be located on Exhibit A hereto: ❑ Sewer Improvements. ❑ Underground Utility Conversions. Signature Printed Name Address Telephone Number 14- 7nnc Aln "023 ATTACHMENT 3 PETITION FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) AREA C - WESTWARD HO We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of La Quinta ( the "City") pursuant to Part 7.5 of the Special Assessment Investigations, Limitation and Majority Protest Act ("1931 Act"), and Section 5896.5 of the Streets and Highways Code to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District"), and one or more zones of benefit thereof, for the purpose of construction and/or acquiring certain public improvements including, without limitation, sewers, underground utilities, perimeter walls, and the underground conversion of certain overhead utilities (the Project"). A brief description of the Project and an estimate of the total costs of the Project to be financed by the District, broken down by proposed zones of benefit, is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The boundaries of the District shall be those referred to in a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the District, and shall govem for all details as to the extent of the District. By executing this Petition, you are indicating your desire that the City Council commence proceedings to form the District, conduct appropriate legal proceedings and elections relating thereto, and if properly approved, commence the Project and issue bonds for the financing thereof. The District may be formed with one or more zones of benefit and the improvements and the assessments contained in all zones of benefit may or may not be equivalent. By executing this Petition, you are requesting that the improvements described herein, including the utility undergrounding conversion, if applicable, be performed as provided by Streets and Highways Code Section 5896.5. In addition to the execution of this Petition in the place provided herein, please indicate which, if any, categories of improvements you are requesting by checking the appropriate box or boxes. The specific description of the improvements mentioned below and their estimated costs for your zone of benefit can be located on Exhibit A hereto: ❑ Sewer Improvements. ❑ Underground Utility Conversions. Signature Printed Name Address Telephone Number 141 Wominl a n�� PETITION FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) AREA A - VILLAGE We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of La Quinta ( the "Cito pursuant to Part 7.5 of the Special Assessment Investigations, Limitation and Majority Protest Act ("1931 Act'), and Section 5896.5 of the Streets and Highways Code to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District'), and one or more zones of benefit thereof, for the purpose of construction and/or acquiring certain public improvements including, without limitation, sewers, underground utilities, perimeter walls, and the underground conversion of certain overhead utilities (the Project"). A brief description of the Project and an estimate of the total costs of the Project to be financed by the District, broken down by proposed zones of benefit, is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The'boundaries of the District shall be those referred to in a plat or map on file i� the office of the City Cle.rk which shalt indicate by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the. District,, and shall govern for all details as to -the extent of the District. _ By executing this Petition, you are indicating your desire that the City Council commence proceedings to form.the °District, conduct appropriate legal proceedings and elections relating.ttereto,,and if, properly approved, commence the Project and issuei bonds for -the financing -thereof ' . The :District may be formed with one or more zones of benefit and the improvements' and the: assessments. contained in all zones of benefit mayor. may not: be equivalent.: By executing this Petition; you are requesting that the improvements described herein; ,including -the utility, undergrounding conversion, if 'appli+cable, be :performed as provided by Streets and Highways Code.Section 5896.5. In addition ;to the .execution of this Petition in the place provided herein, please indicate. which, if any, categories of improvements you are requesting by checking the appropriate box or boxes. 'The specific description of the improvements mentioned below °and, their estimated costs for your zone of benefit can be located on Exhibit. A hereto: ❑ Sewer Improvements. .Underground Utility Conversions. Signature AAA PETITION FOR FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF LA QUINTA ATTACHMENT 5 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 (PHASE VI IMPROVEMENTS) AREA D - SAGEBRUSH / BOTTLEBRUSH / SAGUARO We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of La Quinta ( the y`� pursuant to. Part 7.5 of the Special Assessment Investigations, Limitation and Majority Protest -Act ("1931 Act"); and Section 5896.5 of the Streets and Highways Code to form Assessment District No. 2000-1 (Phase VI Improvements) (the "District'), and one or more zones of benefit thereof, for the purpose of construction and/or acquiring certain public 'improvements -including, without limitation, sewers, underground utilities, perimeter walls, and =-the, underground conversion of certain overhead utilities (the Project'). A brief description of the Project and an estimate of the total costs of the Project to be financed by the District, broken down .by proposed zones of benefit, is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The boundaries of the District shall be those referred to in a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of the ten itory included in the District, and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the District. By executing this. Petition, you are indicating your desire that the City Council commence proceedings to form the District, conduct appropriate legal proceedings and elections relating thereto, and if properly approved, commence the Project and issue bonds for the financing thereof.The District may be formed with one or more zones of benefit and the improvements and the assessments contained in all zones of benefit may or may not be equivalent. By executing this Petition, you are requesting that the improvements described herein, including the utility undergrounding conversion, if applicable, be performed as .provided by Streets and Highways Code Section 5896.5. In addition to the execution of this Petition in the place provided herein, please indicate which, if any, categories of improvements you are requesting by checking the appropriate box or boxes. The specific description of the improvements mentioned below and their estimated costs for your zone of benefit can be located on Exhibit A hereto: ❑ Sewer Improvements. ❑ Underground Utility Conversions. ❑ Perimeter Wall. Signature Printed Name Address Telephone Number 5 14 Zone No. o n r Tittv 4 4 Q" AGENDA CATEGORY: //�� BUSINESS SESSION: 0— COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION: Continued Consideration of KSL's Request that the PUBLIC HEARING: City of La Quinta Modify its Position on the Proposed National Monument Designation RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: This matter was continued by the City Council on January 18, 2000 to March 7, 2000 (Attachment 1). The City has received a copy of the draft legislation prepared by Congresswoman Mary Bono's Office on February 2, 2000 (Attachment 2). The draft legislation contained language which specifically stated that the Monument boundaries would be consistent with the Santa Rosa National Scenic Area. A letter was sent to Congresswoman Mary Bono's Office stating the City's concern with this provision and recommended the legislation be modified to reflect the boundaries as depicted on the Map previously prepared and considered by the City Council (Attachment 3). In response to the City's letter, new draft legislation dated February 9, 2000 was prepared by Congresswoman Bono's Office which modified the National Monument boundaries to take into consideration the boundaries as depicted on the Map prepared by the BLM, thereby not relying only on the boundaries of the Santa Rosa National Scenic Area (Attachment 4). The legislation was proposed to be introduced as soon as possible. Us C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-Monument.wpd Staff has prepared the attached Resolution in support of the most recent version of the legislation for Council consideration. The previous Council reports on this matter are included as Attachment 5 in the form of Council Minutes (dated January 4, 2000, and April 5, 1999). FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the legislation and boundaries as prepared; or 2 Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the legislation and boundaries as prepared; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, e-L dJyry Herm n mmuni Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. City Council Minutes of January 18, 2000 2. Draft legislation dated February 2, 2000 3. City letter dated February 4, 2000 to Congresswoman Mary Bono 4. Draft legislation dated February 9, 2000 5. Minutes from previous City Council meetings 147 002 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-Monument.wpd RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains in Southern California contain nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, educational, and scientific values; and, WHEREAS, the magnificent vistas, wildlife, land forms, natural and cultural resources of the mountains occupy a unique and challenging position given their proximity to highly urbanized areas of the Coachella Valley; and, WHEREAS, these mountains, which rise abruptly from the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, provide a picturesque backdrop for Coachella Valley communities and support an abundance of recreational opportunities that are an important regional economic resource; and, WHEREAS, the boundaries of the National Monument consist of portions of the Santa Rosa National Scenic Area and other Federal lands and Federal interests in lands located within the boundaries depicted on the Map entitled "Boundary Map, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto National Monument" as presented to the City Council on January 18, 2000, by the Bureau of Land Management. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does hereby recognize the importance of protecting this magnificent and unique resource and supports the establishment of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument and the boundaries illustrated on the attached Map (Exhibit "A"), in order to preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, and scientific values found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, California, as an enduring legacy of our heritage, and to secure for future generations the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, wildlife, land forms, and natural and cultural resources in these mountains. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ResoCC National Monument.wpd 148 003 City Council Resolution 2000- National Monument AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 143 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ResoCC National Monument.wpd 004 ATTACHMENT I City Council Minutes 10 January 18, 2000 Mayor Pena reiterated this item will b ontinued to February 15. Council concurred to consider B ' ess Session Item No. 8 at this time. BUSINESS SESSION ......... continued 8. CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF KSL's REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIFY ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATION. Community Development Director Herman advised draft legislation is expected to be posted on Congresswoman Bono's website in early February and considered by the Legislative Committee in Washington D.C. in late February. He then reviewed the revised boundary map, noting the boundary line begins at the 200-foot elevation level in the mountain side. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman stated it's his understanding that almost everyone involved is in agreement with the revised map. After a brief discussion, Council concurred to continue its "wait and hold" stance until the draft legislation process is completed. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to continue any action on the matter of the proposed National Monument designation legislation to March 7, 2000. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2000-13. 6. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY PARK NORTH MASTER PLAN. Com ity Services Director Horvitz presented a brief history on the project as outlined fih,.the staff report. Mayor Pena star he and the City Manager recently met with Assemblyman Battin and members o he AYSO Board regarding the need for dedicated soccer fields. He suggested r rring this back to staff to revise the park as a dedicated soccer field with er small components and using the Sports Complex as a dedicated baseball d. City Manager Genovese noted if substantia anges are made the master plan should go back through the conceptual plan proc because the use and, intent of the park is important in the design element. 151 007 ATTACHMENT 2 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 106TH CONGRESS 2D SESSIOA Ho Ro IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mrs. BONO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on F_"W:3111 To establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of California, which shall consist of the existing Santa Rosa National Scenic Area and other Federal lands in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4 (a) SHORT TITLE. —This Act may be cited as the 5 "Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monu- 6 ment Act of 2000". February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 13`' 008 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 011 1 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS. —The table of contents of 2 this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Establishment of Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, California. See. 3. Management of Federal lands iu the National Monument. Sec. 4. Development of management plan. Sec. 5. Effect on existing and historical uses of Federal lauds included iu Monumcut. Sec. 6. Acynisitiou of land. Sec. 7. Local adhrisor , committee. 3 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SANTA ROSA AND SAN 4 JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT, 5 CALIFORNIA. 6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSES. —In order to 7 preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, rec- 8 reational, geological, educational, and scientific values 9 found in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains in 10 the State of California and to secure for future genera- 1 1 tions the opportunity to experience the magnificent vistas, 12 wildlife, landforms, and natural and cultural resources in 13 these mountains, there is hereby designated the Santa 14 Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument (in 15 this Act referred to as the "National Monument"). 16 (b) BOUNDARIES. —The National Monument shall 17 consist of the Santa Rosa National Scenic Area, which was 18 created by the Secretary of the Interior by administrative 19 action in 1990, and other Federal lands and interests in 20 lands located within the boundaries depicted on the map 21 entitled "Boundary Map, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 153 009 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 3 1 National Monument", dated 2000. The 2 boundaries of the National Monument encompass approxi- 3 mately 280,000 acres of land. 4 (c) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS; CORRECTION OF ER- 5 RORS.- 6 (1) PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION. As soon 7 as practicable after the date of the enactment of this 8 Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall use the map 9 referred to in subsection (b) to prepare legal descrip- 10 tions of the boundaries of the National Monument. 11 The Secretary shall submit the resulting legal de- 12 scriptions to the Committee on Resources and the 13 Committee on Agriculture of the House of Rep- 14 resentatives and to the Committee on Energy and 15 Natural Resources and the Committee on Agri- 16 culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate. 17 (2) LEGAL EFFECT. —The map and legal de- 18 scriptions shall have the same force and effect as if 19 included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the 20 Interior may correct clerical and typographical er- 21 rors in the map or legal descriptions and make 22 minor revisions in the boundaries of the National 23 Monument. The map shall be on file and available 24 for public inspection in appropriate offices of the February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 13, 010 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 4 1 Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Serv- 2 ice. 3 SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL LANDS IN THE NA- 4 TIONAL MONUMENT. 5 (a) MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES.- 6 (1) ROLE OF SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.- 7 Except as provided in paragraph (2), the adminis- 8 tration, protection, and development of the National 9 Monument shall be exercised under the direction of 10 the Secretary of the Interior by the Bureau of Land 11 Management. 12 (2) ROLE OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.- 13 Federal lands within the National Monument that, 14 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, are in- 15 eluded in the National Forest System shall continue 16 to be managed by the Secretary of Agriculture act- 17 ing through the Forest Service. Lands within the 18 National Monument boundaries that are acquired 19 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and are 20 surrounded by National Forest System lands, shall 21 also be managed by the Secretary of Agriculture. 22 (b) PROTECTION OF RESERVATION, STATE, AND PRI- 23 VATE LANDS AND INTERESTS. —The establishment of the 24 National Monument shall not affect any Indian Reserva- 25 tion, State, City, County, special district, or privately February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6W20200\020200.007 01� i F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 5 1 owned lands or interests in lands. Nothing in this Act shall 2 be construed to grant the Secretary of the Interior or the 3 Secretary of Agriculture any authority on or over non- 4 Federal lands not already provided by law. The authority 5 of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agri- 6 culture under this Act extends only to Federal lands in- 7 cluded in the National Monument. 8 (c) ExIsTINr RIGHTS. —The management of the Na- 9 tional Monument shall be subject to valid existing rights. 10 (d) NO BUFFER ZONES AROUND NATIONAL MONU- 11 MENT.- 12 (1) IN GENERAL. —The Congress does not in- 13 tend for the designation of the National Monument 14 to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or 15 buffer zones around the National Monument. 16 (2) CONTINUATION OF ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE 17 MONUMENT. —The fact that activities or uses of land 18 outside of the National Monument can be seen or 19 heard from land within the National Monument sliall 20 not preclude such activities or uses up to the bound- 21 aries of the National Monument, and the Secretary 22 of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture may 23 not use the existence of the National Monument to 24 require a landowner to undertake or implement any February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:W6\020200\020200.007 156 012 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 6 1 mitigation measures to reduce the effect of such ac- 2 tivities or uses. 3 SEC. 4. DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN. 4 (a) DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED. —The Secretary of 5 the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall prepare 6 a management plan for the National Monument consistent 7 with this Act and the conservation, enhancement, and pro- 8 tection of the National Monument. 9 (b) CONSULTATION. —The Secretaries shall prepare 10 and implement the management plan in consultation with 11 the local advisory committee established pursuant to sec- 12 tion 7 and with interested owners of private property lo- 13 cated within the boundaries of the National Monument. 14 Such consultation shall be on a periodic and regular basis. 15 (c) COMPLETION; REVISION. —The Secretaries shall 16 complete the management plan within four years after the 17 date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretaries may 18 revise the management plan thereafter as necessary, fol- 19 lowing consultation with representatives of various govern- 20 mental entities and other groups listed in subsection (b). 21 (d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.- 22 (1) GENERAL AUTHORITY. —The Secretaries 23 may, consistent with the management plan and ex- 24 isting authorities, enter into cooperative agreements, 25 shared management arrangements, or special use February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 157 013 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 7 1 permits with any person for the purposes of manage- 2 ment, interpretation, and research of the National 3 Monument's resources. 4 (2) USE OF CERTAIN LANDS BY UNIVERSITY OF 5 CALIFORNIA.—In the case of any agreement with the 6 University of California in existence as of the enact- 7 ment of . this Act relating to the University's use of 8 certain Federal land within the National Monument, 9 the Secretary of the Interior shall, consistent with 10 the management plan and existing authorities, either 11 revise the agreement as may be necessary to ensure 12 its consistency with this Act or enter into a new 13 agreement to ensure the continuation of the Univer- 14 sity's and lands research and educational activities 15 within the National Monument. 16 SEC. b. EFFECT ON EXISTING AND HISTORICAL USES OF 17 . FEDERAL LANDS INCLUDED IN MONUMENT. 18 (a) IN GENERAL. —The establishment of the National 19 Monument shall not be construed to alter the existing au- 20 thorized uses of the Federal lands included in the National 21 Monument. For purposes of this subsection, the Secretary 22 of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall treat 23 a land use as an existing authorized land use if that land 24 use was an authorized use as January 1, 1999, or was February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:W6 N0200\020200.007 J 014 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 1 an historical use of the lands included in the National 2 Monument. 3 (b) HUNTING, TRAPPING, AND FISHING. —The Secre- 4 taries shall permit hunting, trapping, and fishing on lands 5 and waters within the national monument in accordance 6 with applicable Federal and State law. % (c) ACCESS TO STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS. —If any 8 State or privately owned land or any valid mining claim 9 or other valid occupancy is within the boundaries of the 10 National Monument, or if State or private subsurface 11 rights underlie public lands within the National Monu- 12 ment, the Secretaries shall provide the State or private 13 owner, claimant, or occupier and their successors in inter- 14 est such rights as may be necessary to assure adequate, 15 reasonable, and economically feasible access for economic 16 and other purposes to the site concerned. 17 (d) WATER AND WATER RIGHTS. —The establish- 18 ment of the National Monument shall not be construed 19 to authorize or imply the reservation or appropriation of 20 water or water rights or to alter or affect the water rights 21 of local water agencies. 22 (e) MAINTENANCE OF ROADS, TRAILS, AND STRUC- 23 TURES.—In the case of all existing and historical road- 24 ways, jeep trails, and paths located in the National Monu- 25 ment, the Secretaries shall maintain or allow the mainte- February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 9 1 nance of the roadways, trails, and paths to standards ca- 2 pable for sustaining at least the same level of use as in 3 existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 4 (f) GRAzINC.—The Secretaries shall permit grazing 5 on lands within the National Monument at least to the 6 same extent as was permitted on such lands during cal- 1 endar year 1998. The Secretaries shall ensure that per- 8 sons holding grazing permits for lands within the National 9 Monument, their designees, and their successors in inter- 10 est have unrestricted access to buildings, stock tanks, cor- 11 rals, and other man-made structures within their allot- 12 ments that are necessary for their grazing operations. The 13 Secretaries shall guarantee grazing permit holders the 14 right to maintain existing improvements and to create new 15 improvements needed for grazing operations. 16 (g) OVERFLIGHTS. —The Secretaries shall permit air- 17 craft and helicopter overflights of lands and landings with- 18 in the National Monument at least to the same extent as 19 was permitted over such lands during calendar year 1998. 20 SEC. 6. ACQUISITION OF LAND. 21 (a) ACQUISITION AUTHORIZED; METHODS. —State, 22 local government, Tribal, and privately held land or inter- 23 ests in land within the boundaries of the National Monu- 24 ment may be acquired for management as part of the Na- 25 tional Monument only by— m February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:W6\020200\020200.007 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.G. 10 1 (1) donation, 2 (2) purchase from a willing seller with donated 3 or appropriated funds; or 4 (3) exchange with a willing party. 5 (b) PRIORITY FOR USE OF EASEMENTS. —To the ex- 6 tent practicable, the Secretary of the Interior and the Sec- 7 retary of Agriculture shall use permanent or temporary 8 conservation easements as the preferred method to acquire 9 interests in land in the National Monument in lieu of ac- 10 quiring land in fee simple and thereby removing land from 11 non -Federal ownership. 12 (C) VALUATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. —The 13 United States shall pay the fair market value for any in- 14 terests or partial interests in property acquired under this 15 section. The value of the property shall be assessed as if 16 the National Monument did not exist. 17 (d) LAND EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED. —The Secretary 18 of Interior may enter into a land exchange with the Agua 19 Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians to acquire lands held 20 by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians within the 21 National Monument in exchange for lands previously ac- 22 quired by the Bureau of Land Management using amounts 23 made available under the Land and Water Conservation 24 Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601-4 et seq.). The lands February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:W6\020200\020200.007 161 017 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft) H.L.C. 11 1 acquired by the Secretary of Interior shall be managed for 2 the purposes described in section 2(a). 3 SEC. 7. LOCAL ADVISORY COMIV =E. 4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT. —The President shall establish 5 an advisory committee for the National Monument, whose 6 purpose shall be to advise the Secretary of the Interior 7 and the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to the prepa- 8 ration and implementation of the management plan re- 9 quired by section 4. 10 (b) REPRESENTATION. —The advisory committee 11 shall consist of the following members, appointed by the 12 President from nominees recommended by the Secretary 13 of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture: 14 (1) A11 individual with a recognized background 15 in ecological restoration, research, and application. 16 The Secretaries shall make their recommendation to 17 the President for this member from nominees sub- 18 mitted by the University of California or the College 19 of the Desert. 20 (2) A representative of the California Depart- 21 ment of Fish and Game and a representative of the 22 California Department of Parks and Recreation. 23 (3) A representative of the County of Riverside, 24 California. February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:W6\020200\020200.007 162 018 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 12 (4) A representative of each of the following cit- ies: Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, La Quinta, Palm Desert, and Indian Wells. (5) A representative of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. (6) A representative of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. (7) A representative of the local Farm Bureau. (8) A representative of the Building Industry Association. (9) A representative of the Winter Park Au- thority. (c) TERMS.— (1) STAGGERED TERMS. —Members of the advi- sory committee shall be appointed for terms of three years, except that, of the members first appointed, one-third of members shall be appointed for a term of 1 year and one-third of the members shall be ap- pointed for a term of 2 years. (2) REAPPOINTMENT. —A member may be re- appointed to serve on the advisory committee upon the expiration of the member's current term. (3) VACANCY. —A vacancy on the advisory com- mittee shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. 10 019 F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12A [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 13 1 (d) QUORUM. —A quorum shall be eight members of 2 the advisory committee. The operations of the advisory 3 committee shall not be impaired by the fact that a member 4 has not yet been appointed as long as a quorum has been 5 attained. 6 (e) CHAIRPERSON AND PROCEDURES. —The advisory 7 committee shall elect a chairperson and establish such 8 rules and procedures as it deems necessary or desirable. 9 (f) SERVICE WITHOUT COMPENSATION. —Members 10 of the advisory committee shall serve without pay. February 2, 2000 (10:32 AM) F:\V6\020200\020200.007 164 020 ATTACHMENT 3 TUT QaA P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 February 4, 2000 Congresswoman Mary Bono United States Congress - 44" District 155 South Palm Canyon Drive, Suite B23 Palm Springs, California 92262 Congresswoman Bono: (760) 777-7000 (TDD) (760) 777-1227 The City Council adopted Resolution 99-50 supporting designation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument at its regular meeting of April 6, 1999. Subsequently, representatives from your Office met with staff from the Mountains Conservancy, Bureau of Land Management, Bbilding Industry Association and the City, and other public and private parties, to review proposed boundaries and draft legislation. The La Quinta City Council reconsidered this matter at its regular meetings of January 4 and January 18, 2000. At these meetings, the Council considered comments from interested parties regarding the proposed Monument, its boundaries and potential impacts. The Council was advised of the meetings being held with representatives from your office, and the progress being _ made on proposed Monument boundaries consistent with certain topographical characteristics of the mountain terrain (i.e., generally the 200' contour). The City Council approved a minute order on January 4, 2000 "...to rescind the approval given in Resolution 99- 50 and indicate support for the process of input to Congresswoman Bono's Office to develop draft legislation for a National Monument designation to go forward." The City Council continued consideration of this matter at its regular meeting of January 18, 2000 pending preparation of actual draft legislation by your Office. Staff received a copy of draft legislation prepared by your Office on February 3, 2000 and notes that the legislation proposes Monument boundaries consistent with "... the Santa Rosa National Scenic Area ... and other Federal lands and interests in lands located within the .." referenced boundary map. The National Scenic Area boundaries within La Quinta extend beyond those on the boundary map previously being drafted by our respective staffs and include properties below the 200' contour. Accordingly, the proposed boundaries within the new legislation are not consistent with the boundaries previously considered and referenced before the La Quinta City Council. The La Quinta City Council has taken an active interest in legislation promoting establishment of the National Monument as evidenced by actions taken on April 6, 1999 and January 4 and 18, 2000. Staff will forward the new draft legislation to the City Council for consideration at its next meeting. Staff will advise you of any action taken thereto at the earliest opportunity. Thank you for consideration of the City of La Quinta's comments on this matter. Please call me at (760) 777-7100 if you have questions or comments regarding the above. �Sincerely, THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Manager TPG:cw c: City Council 'j GG 022 From: Walter, Linda" <Linda.Valter@mail.house.gov> To: "'douge@ci.palm-springs.ca.us"' <douge@ci.palm-spr... Date: Wed, Feb 9, 2000 11:02 AM Subject: NEW DRAFT As of today, this is the latest draft I have of the proposed monument bill. I would appreciate some quick, initial feedback since Congresswoman Bono would like to introduce the bill as soon as possible. Thanks! LINDA VALTER Rep. Mary Bono's Office 202-225-5330 > <<BONO 12D.PDF>> ATTACHMENT 4 167 023 F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 106TIl CONGRESS 2D SESSION H.R. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTXrIVES `1rs. BONO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee Oil A BILL To establish the Santa. Rosa and San Jacinto :Mountains National ;Monument in the State of California. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of'Representa- 2 tives o 'the United States of'America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4 (a) SHORT 'TITLE. —'Phis Act may be cited as the 5 "Santa, Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains National l2onu- 6 ment Act of 2000". 7 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS. —The table of contents of 8 this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Establishment of Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, California. 168 024 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•%ua%mnanrnn9nonn nna F:\M6\B0N0\B0N0.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 2 Sec. 3. Management of Federal lands in the National Monument. See. 4. Development of management plan. Sec. 5. Effect on existing and historical uses of Federal lands included in Monument. See. 6. Acquisition of land. See. 7. Local advisory committee. 1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SANTA ROSA AND SAN 2 JACINTO MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT, 3 CALIFORNIA. 4 (a) FINDINGS. —Congress finds the following: 5 (1) The Santa, Rosa and San Jacinto Moun- 6 tains in southern California contain nationally sig- 7 nificant biological, cultural, recreational, geological, 8 educational, and scientific values. 9 (2) The magnificent vistas, wildlife, landforms, 10 and natural and cultural resources of these moun- 11 tains occupy a unique and challenging position given 12 their proximity to highly urbanized areas of the 13 Coachella Valley. 14 (3) These mountains, which rise abruptly from 15 the desert floor to an elevation of 10,802 feet, pro- 16 vide a picturesque backdrop for Coachella,. Valley 17 communities and support an abundance of rec- 18 reational opportunities that are an important re- 19 gional economic resource. 20 (4) These mountains have special cultural value 21 to the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla. Indians, con- 22 taining significant cultural sites, including village 169 025 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•%ua%nrnnonn\n9nonn nna F:\M6\B0N0\B0N0.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 3 1 sites, trails, petroglyphs, and other evidence of their 2 habitation. 3 (b) ESTABLISIUMENT AND PURPOSES. —In order to 4 preserve the nationally significant biological, cultural, rec- 5 reational, geological, educational, and scientific values 6 found in the Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains and 7 to secure for future generations the opportunity to experi- 8 ence the magnificent vistas, wildlife, landforms, and nat- 9 ural and cultural resources in these mountains, there is 10 hereby designated the Santa. Rosa. and San Jacinto Moun- 11 tains National Monument (in this Act referred to as the 12 "National Monument" ) . 13 (e) BOUNDARIES. —The National Monument shall 14 consist of Federal lands and Federal interests in lands lo- 15 eated within the boundaries depicted on the map entitled 16 "Boundary Map, Santa. Rosa, and San Jacinto National 17 Monument", dated , 2000. 18 (d) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS; CORRECTION OF ER- 19 RORs.- 20 (1) PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION. As soon 21 as practicable after the date of the enactment of this 22 Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall use the map 23 referred to in subsection (e) to prepare legal deserip- 24 tions of the boundaries of the National Monument. 25 The Secretary shall submit the. resulting legal de- �.7 0 026 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•\Nia\mnonrnmnonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 4 1 scriptions to the Committee on Resources and the 2 Committee on Agriculture of the House of Rep- 3 resentatives and to the Committee on Energy and 4 Natural Resources and the Committee on Agri- 5 culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate. 6 (2) LEGAL EFFECT. —The map and legal de- 1 scriptions of the National Monument shall have the 8 same force and effect as if included in this Act, ex- 9 cept that the Secretary of the Interior may correct 10 clerical and typographical errors in the map and 11 legal descriptions. 'rho map shall be on file and 12 available for public inspection in appropriate offices 13 of the Bureau of Land Management and the. Forest 14 Service. 15 SEC. 3. MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL LANDS IN THE NA- 16 TIONAL MONUMENT. 17 (a) BASIS OF MANAGEMENT. —The Secretary of the 18 Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall manage the 19 National Monument to protect the resources of the Na. 20 tional Monument in accordance with- 21 (1) this Act; 22 (2) the Federal Land Policy and Management 23 Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 24 (3) other applicable provisions of law. 171 - 027 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) P-%x/A\n5,nonn\ngnonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 5 1 (b) DIVISION OF MANAGEMENT RESYONSIBIL- 2 ITIES.- 3 (1) ROLE OF SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.- 4 Federal lands and Federal interests in lands within 5 the National ;Monument that, as of the date of the 6 ena.etment of this Act are administered by the Bu- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 reau of Land Management shall continue to be man- aged by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land :Management. Lands or inter- ests in lands within the National Monument bound- aries that are acquired after the date of the enact- ment of this Act, and are surrounded by lands ad- ministered by the Bureau of Land Management, shall also be managed by' the Secretary of the Inte- rior. (2) ROLE OF SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.— Federa.l lands and Federal interests in lands within the National ;Monument that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, are included in the National Forest System shall continue to be managed by the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Forest Service. Lands or interests in lands within the Na- tional Monument boundaries that are acquired after the date of the enactment of this Act, and are sur- 172 029 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AMA F•%va\mnann\mmnonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 1 1 rounded by National Forest System lands, shall also 2 be managed by the Secretary of Agriculture. 3 (c) PROTECTION OF RESERVATION, STATE, AND PRI- 4 VATE LANDS AND INTERESTS. —The establishment of the 5 National Monument shall not affect any Indian Reserva.- 6 tion, any individually held trust lands, any other Indian 7 allotments, any lands or interests in lands held by the 8 State of California, a political subdivision of the State of 9 California, a, special district, or the Mount San Jacinto 10 Winter Park Authority, or any privately owned lands or 11 interests in lands within the boundaries of the National 12 Monument. Establishment of the National Monument 13 shall not be construed to grant the Secretary of the Inte- 14 rior or the Secretary of Agriculture any authority on or 15 over non -Federal lands not already provided by law. The 16 authority of the Secretary of the Interior and the Sec- 17 retary of Agriculture under this Act extends only to Fed- 18 cral lands and Federal interests in lands included in the 19 National Monument. 20 (d) ExiSTING RIGHTS. —The management of the Na. 21 tional ;Monument shall be subject to valid existing rights. 22 (e) No BUFFER ZONES AROUND NATIONAL MONu- 23 MENT.—The Congress does not intend for the designation 24 of the National Monument to lead to the creation of ex- 25 press or implied protective perimeters or buffer zones, 173 - 020 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•%%iaxngnonn\ngnonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 7 1 whether loea.ted within or outside of the boundaries of the 2 National Monument. The fact that activities or uses of 3 land outside of the National ;Monument, which are con- 4 sistent with other applicable laws, can be seen, heard, or 5 smelled from land within the National Monument shall not 6 preclude such activities or uses up to the boundaries of 7 the National Monument. The Secretary of the Interior and 8 the Secretary of Agriculture may not use the existence of 9 the National Monument to require a person or entity to 10- undertake or implement any exactions or mitigation meas- 11 ures to reduce the effect of such activities or uses. Nothing 12 in this Act shall be construed to change standards gov- 13 erning air or water quality outside of the designated area. 14 of the National ;Monument. 15 1(f) No IMPACT ON AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES AND 16 AUTHORITY. —The existence of the National Monument 17 does not increase or diminish the responsibilities and au- 18 thority of any Federal agency under any other Federal 19 law. 20 SEC. 4. DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN. 21 (a) DE +ELOP.NIENT REQUIRED. —The Secretary of 22 the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall prepare 23 a, management plan for the conservation and protection 24 of the National Monument consistent with the require- 25 ments of section 3(a). 174 030 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•wa%mnonrnr»nann nna F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 8 1 (b) CONSULTATION AND COOPERATION.- 2 (1) IN GENERAL. —The Secretaries shall pre- 3 pare and implement the management plan required 4 by subsection (a) in consultation with the local advi- 5 sory committee established pursuant to section 7, in- 6 terested owners of private property and holders of 7 valid existing rights located within the boundaries of 8 the National Monument, and other interested par- 9 ties. Such consultation shall be on a periodic and 10 regular basis. 11 (2) WINTER PARK AUTHORITY. —The mana.ge- 12 ment plan shall consider the mission of the Mount 13 San Jacinto Winter Park Authority to make aeees- 14 Bible to current and future generations the natural 15 and recreational treasures of the Mount San Jacinto 16 State Park and the National ;Monument. Establish- 17 ment and management of the National Monument 18 shall not be construed to interfere with the mission 19 or powers of the Mount San Ja.einto Winter Park 20 Authority, as provided for in the Mount San Ja,einto 21 Winter Park Authority Act of the State of Cali- 22 forma. 23 (e) INTERIM 1VIANAGEME T.—Pending completion of 24 the management plan required by subsection (a), the Sec- 25 retaries shall manage Federal lands and interests in lands 1715 031 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•xua\ngnonnrnr»nonn nna F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. '0 1 within the National Monument pursuant to management 2 plans in effect for such lands as of the date of the enact- 3 ment of this Act and regulations existing as of that date. 4 (d) COMPLETION; REVISION. —The Secretaries shall 5 complete the management plan required by subsection (a) 6 within three years after the date of the enactment of this 7 Act. The Secretaries may revise the management plan 8 thereafter as necessary, following consultation with rep- 9 resentatives of various governmental entities and other 10 groups listed in subsection (b). 11 (e) COOPERATIVE+' AGREEML+`NTS.- 12 (1) GENERAI, AUTHORITY. —The Secretaries 13 may, consistent with the management plan and ex- 14 isting authorities, enter into cooperative agreements, 15 shared management arrangements, or special use 16 permits with an- y person for the purposes of manage- 17 ment, interpretation, and research of the National 18 Monument's resources. 19 (2) USE OF CERTAIN LANDS BY UNIVERSITY OF 20 CALIFORNIA.—In the case of any agreement with the 21 University of California, in existence as of the enact- 22 ment of this Act relating to the University's use of 23 certain Federal land within the National Monument, 24 the Secretary of the Interior shall, consistent with 25 the management plan and existing authorities, either 176 032 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) vaiF%mnonnxn9nonn and F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 10 1 revise the agreement as may be necessary to ensure 2 its consistency with this Act or enter into a new 3 agreement to ensure the continuation of the Univer- 4 sity's grid lands research and educational activities 5 within the National ;Monument. 6 SEC. 6. EFFECT ON EXISTING AND HISTORICAL USES OF 7 FEDERAL LANDS INCLUDED IN MONUMENT. 8 (a) RECREATIONAI, ACTIVITIES GENERALLY.— The 9 management plan required by section 4(a) shall include 10 provisions to continue to authorize all recreational uses of 11 the National :Monument, including hiking, camping, moun- 12 tain biking, sightseeing, horseback riding, and motorized 13 and mechanized travel, that were authorized on the date 14 of the enactment of this Act on the Federal lands included 15 within the National Monument, as long as such uses are 16 consistent with other applicable law. 17 (b) HUNTING, TRAYYING, AND FISHING. —The ma.n- 18 agement plan required by section 4(a) shall include provi- 19 lions to permit hunting, trapping, and fishing on lands 20 and waters within the National ;Monument in accordance 21 with applicable Federal and State law. 22 (e) ACCESS TO STATE AND PRIVATE LANDS. —The 23 Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture 24 shall provide such access to nonfederally owned land or 25 interests in land within the boundaries of the National I 033 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•Nva\n9nonrnn9nonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 11 1 Monument as may be necessary, to provide the owner of 2 the land or holder of the interest the use and enjoyment 3 of the land or interest. 4 (d) UTIIATI S.—Nothing in this Act or the manage- 5 ment plan required by section 4(a) shall be construed to 6 inhibit or curtail the ability of Government agencies or 7 public utility companies to install, construct, and maintain 8 public utilities and infrastructure within the National 9 Monument, consistent with other applicable Federal and 10 State laws. 11 (c) WATER RIGHTS. —Nothing in this Act, the ma.n- 12. agement plan required by section 4(a), or any action taken 13 pursuant thereto, shall constitute either an express or im- 14 plied reservation of water. Nothing in this Act shall affect 15 any valid existing water right, including any Federal re- 16 served water right; in effect on the date of the enactment 17 of this Act or any water right hereinafter approved pursu- 18 ant to the laws of the State of California. Nothing in this 19 subsection shall constitute a, precedent for any other public 20 lands legislation Congress may enact in the fixture. 21 (f) MAINTENANCE OF ROADS, TRAILS, AND STRUC- 22 TUBES. —In the development of the management plan re- 23 quired by section 4(a), the Secretaries shall address the 24 maintenance of all existing and historical roadways, ,jeep 25 trails, and paths located in the National Monument. Ila 034 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•\ua\nonanrnrononn nna F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 12 1 (g) GRAzIlNG.—Nothing in this Act or the manage- 2 ment plan required by section 4(a) shall be deemed to af- 3 feet existing permits or leases for, or levels of, livestock 4 grazing on Federal lands within the National ;Monument. 5 Existing grazing uses shall continue to be governed by ap- 6 plicable law and regulations other than this Act. 7 (h) OVERFLIGHTS. Nothing in this Act or the man- 8 agement plan required by section 4(a) shall be construed 9 to restrict or preclude overflights, including low-level over- 10 flights, over lands included in the National Monument, in- 11 eluding military overflights that can be seen or heard with- 12 in the National :Monument. Nothing in this Act or the 13 management plan shall be construed to restrict or pre- 14 elude the designation or creation of new units of special 15 use airspace or the establishment of military flight train- 16 ing routes over the National Monument. 17 (i) MINERAL WITHDRAWAL. —Subject to valid exist- 18 ing rights as provided in section 3 (d), the Federal lands 19 and interests in lands included within the National Monu- 20 ment are hereby withdrawn from all forms of entry, appro- 21 priation, or disposal under the public land laws, from loca, 22 tion, entry, and patent under the . public land mining laws, 23 and from disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral 24 and geothermal leasing, and mineral materials. February 9, 2000 {9:55 AM) r-•%va%mnonrnn9nonn and F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 13 1 SEC. 6. ACQUISITION OF LAND. 2 (a) ACQUISITION AUTHORIZED; METHODS. —State, 3 local government, Tribal, and privately held land or inter- 4 ests in land within the boundaries of the National Monu- 5 ment may be acquired for management as part of the Na- 6 tional Monument only by- 7 (1) donation; 8 (2) purchase from a, willing seller; or 9 (3) exchange with a, willing party. t0 (b) USE OF EASEMENTS. —To the extent practicable, 11 the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agri- 12 culture shall consider conservation casements as the pre- 13 (erred method to acquire interests in land in the National 14 Monument in lieu of acquiring land in fee simple and 15 thereby removing land from non -Federal ownership. 16 (c) VALUATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. —The 17 United States shall pay the fair market value for any in- 18 terests or partial interests in property acquired under this 19 section. 20 (d) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LANDS AND IN- 21 TERESTS. Any lands or interest in lands within the 22 boundaries of the National Monument that is acquired by 23 the United States after the date of the enactment of this 24 Act shall be added to and administered as part of the Na. 25 tional Monument. Im 038 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•%ua%mnanrnn9nann and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] 14 1 (e) LAND EXCHANGE AUTHORIZED. —In order to 2 support the cooperative management agreement in effect 3 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 4 of Interior -may exchange lands, which the Bureau of Land 5 Management has acquired using amounts provided under 6 the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 7 U.S.C. 4601-4 et seq.), with the Agua, Caliente Band of 8 Cahuilla Indians. The exchanged lands within the bound- 9 aries of the National :Monument shall be managed for the 10 purposes described in section 2(b). 11 SEC. 7. LOCAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. 12 (a) ESTABLISHMENT. —The President shall establish, 13 an advisory committee for the National ;Monument, whose 14 purpose shall be to advise the Secretary of the Interior 15 and the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to the preps. 16 ration and implementation of the management plan re- 17 quircd by section 4. 18 (b) REPRESENTATION. —The advisory committee 19 shall consist of the following members, appointed by the 20 President from nominees recommended by the Secretary 21 of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture: 22 (1) An individual with a, recognized background 23 in ecological restoration, research, and application. 24 The Secretaries shall make their recommendation to 25 the President for this member from nominees sub- i 037 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) G•\va\mnanrnmnonn nna F:\M6\BONG\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 mitted by the University of California, or the College of the Desert. (2) A representative of the California Depart- ment of Fish and Game and a, representative of the California, Department of Parks and Recreation. (3) A representative of the County of Riverside, California. (4) A representative of each of the following cit- ies: Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, La Quinta., Palm Desert, and Indian Wells. (5) A representative of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla, Indians. (6) A representative of the Coa.chclla Valley Mountains Conservancy. (7) A representative of the local Sierra, Club or, if no such representative is available, another recog- nized conservation organization. (8) A representative of the local Farm Bureau. (9) A representative of the Building Industry Association. (10) A representative of the Winter Park Au- thority. (11) A representative of County Service Area 60, Pinyon. (c) TERMS.- 182 038 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•%va%mnonnv»nonn and F:\M6\BONO\BONO.12D [Discussion Draft] H.L.C. 16 1 (1) STAGGERED TERMS. —Members of the advi- 2 sory committee shall be appointed for terms of three 3 years, except that, of the members first appointed, 4 one-third of members shall be appointed for a, term 5 of 1 year and one-third of the members shall be ap- 6 pointed for a term of 2 years. 7 (2) REAPPOINTMENT. —A member may be re- 8 appointed to serve on the advisory committee upon 9 the expiration of the member's current term. 10 (3) VACAN CY. A vacancy on the advisory eom- 11 mittee shall be filled in the same manner as the 12 original appointment. 13 (d) QUORUM. —A quorum shall be eight members of 14 the advisory committee. The operations of the advisory 15 committee shall not be unpaired by the fact that a member 16 ha,s not yet been appointed as long as a, quorum has been 17 attained. 18 (C) CHAIRPERSON AND PROCEDURES. --The advisory 19 committee shall elect a, chairperson and establish such 20 rules and procedures as it deems necessary or desirable. 21 (f) SERVICE WPl'HOUT COMPENSATION. —Members 22 of the advisory committee shall serve without pay. 183 039 February 9, 2000 (9:55 AM) F•wa\n,>nonrnmnonn nna t ATTACHMENT 5 4 City Council Minutes 5 January 4, 2000 After a brief discussion Council concur d to direct staff to schedule meetings on February 7 with the Thermal Co unity Council at either Coachella Valley High School or the Imperial Irriga 'on District Office at 7:00 p.m. and with the Torres Martinez Indian Resery ion representatives at noon. The structure of the Council/staff group will epend on who the tribe and Thermal group want to meet with. 5. CONSIDERATION OF KSL'S REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIFY ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATION. Community Development Director Herman reviewed the new boundary map for the proposed National Monument, advising the boundary is higher than the toe of the slope in some cases and some residential units are within the boundaries of the proposed monument. Bill Havert, 45-480 Portola Avenue, Palm Desert, Executive Director of C. V. Mountains Conservancy, stated the purpose of the legislation is to enhance the likelihood of getting congressional funding to BLM and the Forest Service and for acquisition of lands from willing sellers within the National Monument boundaries. It does not preclude development. He felt any exclusion of lands within city boundaries would leave the National Monument'without any real meaning and believed the legislation should be kept simple and with clear focus to avoid having it die in Congress, which could result in the President declaring it a National Monument by executive order. They are working with Congresswoman Bono's Office and other agencies to work out the issues involved. Jim Kenna, Manager of Palm Springs Office Bureau of Land Management, agreed with keeping the legislation simple and felt it should not include a buffer zone. Steve Robbins, P. O. Box 1058, Coachella, of Coachella Valley Water District, stated the District basically supports the National Monument designation but cautioned that Federally -owned property usually precludes anything taking place on the property, including water reservoirs. They feel it will make everything more difficult to accomplish because of the higher environmental standards it will create, and they encourage the cities to pay careful attention to the boundaries and related implications. 184 1'1 r City Council Minutes 6 January 4, 2000 Dick Welsh, 50-505 Grand Traverse Avenue, voiced concern about property rights and encouraged the Council to make sure all the bases are covered instead of buying into the "simplicity" thing. Jacque Becker, 77-620 California Drive, Palm Desert, was concerned about how the designation will impact 200 acres he owns in the Santa Rosa Mountains. Mr. Herman advised Mr. Becker's property is not within the proposed boundaries. Wayne Hancock, 55-920 PGA Boulevard, of KSL Land Corporation, urged the Council to be concerned about exposure of developable lands adjacent to the proposed National Monument and felt any approved legislation should address what's already happening in the area since the proposed boundaries are adjacent to developable properties. He also encouraged the Council to withdraw its endorsement of the draft legislation and reviewed changes they propose to the legislation as outlined in Attachment 2 of the staff report. John Gamlin, 41-865 Boardwalk, Suite 111, Palm Desert, of Coral Mountain Development, commented on the potential economic impacts of having a National Monument adjacent to developments and referenced the environmental record related to the Eagle Mountain Landfill as a good example of what can happen to a development when there's a National Monument/Park nearby. Katherine Heichel, 44-095 Calico Circle, felt the buffer zone may not be large enough and asked for any future meetings where action is to be taken on this issue to be held in the evenings so more members of the community can provide input. Council Member Sniff encouraged each speaker to forward their comments to Congresswoman Bono's Office and felt any response by the Council should be made after the draft legislation has been received. He suggested a continuance to February 1. Council Member Henderson was concerned about the City being on record supporting something that no longer exists and the possibility of the President declaring it a National Monument based on what the cities approved last April. She also has concerns about the buffer zone and believed it's critical for the map to be a part of the legislation. She felt the City should continue supporting the National Monument designation but not based on what was approved in April. to 041 c City Council Minutes 7 January 4, 2000 Mayor Pena continued to have the same concerns about the legislation he had last April and noted the public is concerned about retaining access to the lands. Council Member Perkins felt the Council should support the concept but withdraw its support given last April. He wants to protect the mountains in a reasonable manner and felt something should be done quickly. Council Member Sniff read portions of the resolution adopted last April and noted it's very generic and does not mention the draft legislation or a map. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to rescind the approval given in Resolution No. 99-50 and indicate support for the process of input to Congresswoman Bono's Office to develop draft legislation for a National Monument designation to go forward. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Adolph ABSENT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2000-05. MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to direct staff to bring back a progress report on January 18, 2000, regarding draft legislation leading toward a possible National Monument designation. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Adolph ABSENT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2000-06. 6. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 337 AN ORDINANCE OF TH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.14, SECTION 3.14.010 OF THE LA .QUINTA CHARTER AND UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO AUTHORIZATION OF SIGNATURES FOR CITY ARRANTS. It was moved by Council Members\Sniff/Henderson to adopt Ordinance No. 337 on second reading. Motion carried y the following vote: AYES: Council Members Henders�gn, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSENT: Council Member Adolph ABSTAIN: None 186 042 r] U City Council Minutes 11 April 6, 1999 In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Hartung advised at approximately 26 windows would be replaced. As for the air conditi ing, the offices would continue to be individually controlled by the individ I sensors in each office. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, noted that the p posed window replacement came up as an option in response to Cou il's concern about the lower windows allowing visibility into the offices. Mayor Pena and Council Member Perkins and after a brief discussion, Council con( issue brought back separately. / had concerns about the windows, on having the window treatment MOTION - It was moved by Cou it Members Sniff/Henderson to approve project plans, specifications, and stimates, deleting the window treatments, for Project 99-03, Various City II Improvements, and locating the 1999 art purchase on the City Hall south wn, and authorizing an expenditure of not to exceed $4,000 from the Art in/Public Places Fund to construct a suitable base for the art piece, and furth authorizing staff to advertise the project and receive bids. In response to Council Meghber Adolph, Council Member Sniff clarified that the "suitable" base would be/as determined suitable by the artist. Motion carried unanimdusiv. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-38. Council Member Snif suggested that staff bring back the window treatment issue with options i cluding windows that open and windows with obscured glass. Council concurred on taking up Item No. 10 at this time. 10. CONSIDERATION OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY REQUEST TO SUPPORT THE DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT. Mr. Weiss, Assistant City Manager, advised that the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy is requesting the City's support of legislation that would designate the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains as a National Monument. The Conservancy feels that the designation may enhance the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) and Conservancy's ability to secure Federal acquisition funds in the future. It may also strengthen the valley's appeal for ecotourism. He advised that the cities of Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells have voted to 187 City Council Minutes 12 April 6, 1999 support the designation, and that the issue is pending in the cities of Cathedral City and Palm Desert. Palm Springs has not agendized the issue. Issues and concerns that have surfaced to date include: potential effect on municipal or undeveloped lands adjacent to the mountains; potential for future requests for additional buffers from the National Monument; potential for adverse impact to ecotourism due to limitations placed on trails or future public access to mountains; and potential loss of local control. The proposed legislation attempts to mitigate these concerns by including language in 4(b) and 4(c) that discourages establishment of buffers and states that the designation will not affect Indian reservations, State, or privately -owned lands or interest in lands. Katie Barrows, 45-480 Portola Avenue, Palm Desert, of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy, distributed a map showing the boundaries of the proposed National Monument, and advised that Cathedral City has now voted to support the legislation. The proposed designation will only affect Federal lands (BLM and National Forest), and will not affect private or municipally - owned lands. Except for the potential for mineral withdrawal of the BLM lands, it's reasonable to say that there will be no change from the National Scenic Area status. Their reasons for pursuing this designation are to gain recognition of the value of our natural resources, and to increase chances for funding, which is needed to acquire lands because of the potential Multi -Species Habitat Plan and some of the conflicts due to the Peninsula Big Horn Sheep issue. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. Barrows advised that the Coral Mountain area is included because it's part of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The boundary line is essentially the same as the National Scenic area boundary, and follows the toe of the slope from the San Jacinto Mountains behind Palm Springs southward to the County line. There's a small portion within the Santa Rosa Mountains Wilderness Area. In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Barrows advised that any changes made after the designation is approved would have to go back through Congress. The Conservancy is currently looking for input to find out if there's support for the legislation and what the concerns might be. They've already incorporated language regarding buffers to address some concerns of the Building Industry Association, and will add language to clarify that local government land is excluded. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Barrows advised that it's not their intention to jeopardize or prohibit the trails from being used. Currently there are some concerns about trail access impacting the Big Horn Sheep, and that law would override this legislation. It will not interfere with existing ownerships of property, and land acquisitions will only take place with willing sellers. ,<. City Council Minutes 13 April 6, 1999 In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Barrows advised that there are only three or four National Monuments on BLM land in the United States. Council Member Henderson didn't have a problem with the proposed legislation. Council Member Sniff didn't see any significant downside, and felt there's a lot of positives. It will help provide funding, which is essential if the Conservancy is to move forward in a meaningful way, and it's compatible to La Quinta's commitment to preserve the mountains surrounding the City. He recommended support of the legislation. Council Member Adolph asked if it would result in better maintenance of the trail system, to which Ms. Barrows responded that they hope so and would be pushing for that. Mayor Pena felt the City has been extremely responsible in conserving its hillsides, and believed this legislation would benefit and strengthen what the City already has, noting that there's a lot of concern about maintaining access to the mountains. In response to Mr. Genovese, City Manager, Ms. Barrows confirmed that there would be no Federally -mandated approval processes to develop within the boundaries, and that any restrictions would only apply to Federal lands. RESOLUTION NO. 99-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS AS A NATIONAL MONUMENT. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 99-50 as submitted. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Barrows confirmed that language would be added to exclude cities, the county, and other local jurisdictions. Motion carried unanimously. 0 LUW Titit 4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Consideration of a Request from PGA West Homeowners' Association and KSL Development Corporation to Eliminate the Requirement for an Equestrian Trail along Madison Street RECOMMENDATIONS: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 3 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The City Council, at its February 1, 2000 meeting, received public comment and a letter from the PGA Weft Homeowners' Association, dated January 24, 2000, requesting the City accept an easement from the developer for the equestrian trail's operation, maintenance and liability along the east side of Madison Street (Attachment 1). Additionally, KSL Development Corporation submitted a letter, dated January 28, 2000, requesting the deletion of the General Plan Equestrian Trail designation along Madison Street (Attachment 2). At the same meeting, the City Council directed staff to address these issues at the Council's February 15, 2000 meeting (Attachment 3). The City's General Plan Circulation Element Policy 3-4.1.6 states that " Agrarian Image Corridors shall incorporate equestrian trails..." Also, the Parks and Recreation Element Policy Diagram specifies that the Equestrian Corridor extends from Avenue 50 along Madison Street to Avenue 58 then turns west along Avenue 58 to the Lake Cahuilla County Park equestrian staging area. State law requires any proposed development application to be consistent with the General Plan therefore, all tracts must have an equestrian trail along its Madison Street boundary. C:\My Documents\WPD0CS\cccd-001.wpd 190 On July 20, 1998, the City Council (Attachment 4) approved Tentative Tract Map 28838 located on the east side of Madison Street, south of Airport Boulevard within PGA West. Specific conditions (Attachment 5) were placed on the Tentative Tract Map requiring installation and maintenance of the equestrian trail Condition Nos. 1O.B, 34.C, and 56. On June 15, 1999, the City Council (Attachment 6) approved Tentative Tract Map 29147 located on the east side of Madison Street, north of Avenue 58 within PGA West. Conditions similar to the previous conditions, 11, 52, 64 and 81 (Attachment 7) were placed on this tract. Lastly, the City Council, at its September 7, 1999 (Attachment 8) meeting, approved under Resolution 99-015, The Greg Norman Course Specific Plan located on the east side of Madison Street, north of Airport Boulevard. The document contains within Section 2.5 Circulation Plan, a map and a cross section of the Primary Arterial, Madison Street, showing the equestrian trail (Attachment 9). Therefore, the request by XSL to delete the requirement for an equestrian trail will require amending the General Plan Circulation and Park and Recreation Elements and the Greg Norman Course Specific Plan. Due to the need to provide equestrian access from the rural residential overlay and low density residential areas to Lake Cahuilla County Park, which is the beginning access point to the mountain trail system, as noted in General Plan Policy 5.4.1.4, staff recommends retaining the equestrian trail along Madison Street. Secondly, as requested by the PGA West Homeowner's Association, staff has contacted other cities and counties to inquire about the maintenance and liability of equestrian and/or multi use trails. Generally, all publically used trails are maintained by the city and/or county. Therefore, staff supports their request and recommends a Tract Map Amendment application be submitted for all maps requesting the elimination of the conditions requiring maintenance of the equestrian trail by the developer or homeowners' association.. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Take no action; or 2. Request the applicant submit General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments for Council consideration to eliminate the equestrian trail policies; or 3. Request the applicant submit Tentative Tract Map Amendments to shift the burden of trail maintenance from the developer/HOA to the City along Madisor Street; or 9 �` CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\cccd-OOI.wpd 002 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Herman munity Development Director Approved for submission by, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from the PGA West Homeowners' Association, dated January 24, 2000 2. Letter from KSL Development Corporation dated January 28, 2000 3. City Council Minutes for February 1, 2000 4. City Council Minutes for July 20, 1998 5. Tentative Tract Map 28838 Condition Nos. 11.13, 34.C, 56 6. City Council Minutes for June 15, 1999 7. Tentative Tract Map 29147 Condition Nos. 11, 52, 64 and 81 8. City Council Minutes for September 7, 1999 9. Greg Norman Course Specific Plan Section 2.5 Circulation Plan Map cross section of the Primary Arterial, Madison Street, showing the equestrian trail A.92 003 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\cccd-OOI.wpd � Cam PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 1516, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (760) 776-5100 FAX (760) 776-5111 January 24,2000 Mr. Tom Genovese City Manager City of La Quinta Dear Mr. Genovese ATTACHMENT 1 On June 28,1999, members of the board of the PGA West Master Association met with City Professional Staff in an effort to establish a meeting of minds on several issues relating to the vast new areas of development to be annexed to said Master Association. The meeting was attended by Jim Murphy (VP), Betty Baskin (Past Pres. & Director), the undersigned (Pres.), John Handel (Professional Management/Monarch Group), Steve Speer (Public Works Dept.), Jerry Herman (Planning Director), and Christine de Iorio (Assist. Planning Dir.). At that meeting, an area of discussion was the City requiring the developer to install an Equestrian Path along the east side of Madison Ave. across all the PGA West frontage. We understand that subsequent to the original concept under which our Association was formed, the City has expanded the use of landscape area between curb and wall (along select public streets such as Madison) to include an equestrian path for the use of the general public of La Quinta as well as surrounding Communities. We expressed our concern regarding substitution of a trail (in addition to walkway) for landscape space and the need for the public to be responsible for Equestrian Paths if installed. Our present two thousand La Quinta property owners are not willing to assume the operation, maintenance, or liability of an equestrian path within the open space we will be asked to own and maintain, nor should we be expected to. An equestrian path does not serve any PGA West properties as none are allowed to keep horses and takes a considerable portion of the landscape space. The limited space between wall and curb bisected by a pedestrian walk and a separate equestrian path creates a residual landscape space divided into three very slim strips, not of sufficient width individually to provide the boulevard ambiance initially contemplated. If the City or other Agency insists that an equestrian path be installed, said City or other Agency so requiring should obviously be prepared to accept an easement for the operation, maintenance, and liability thereof. We had the sense that members of the City team present at the June meeting agreed with our position that we should not be asked to .accept the operation, maintenance or liability of an 19 3 111 PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 1516, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (760) 776-5100 FAX (760) 776-5111 equestrian path. We have in the past accepted Landscape Areas between the outer residential peripheral walls and curbing on 54°i and Madison, said landscape areas similar to those adjacent to other Planned Developments Projects in the City with standard landscape improvements that enhance their individual community. There is nothing in the PGA West specific plan, nor in the disclosure documents given to our present two thousand homeowners, suggesting that they would someday have the obligation to operate and maintain an Equestrian Path adjacent to a public roadway outside their common walls. We therefor suggest that is the City is adamant that such a Path be installed, the City accept an easement from the developer for said path's operation, maintenance, and liability prior to the developer turning over the surrounding area to the Master Association. Certainly you would agree that a limited segment of the City population should not be required to operate such a general public facility. We urge you to take immediate action with the developer to accept a path easement in behalf of the City of La Quinta prior to completion of the landscape work as we do not envision accepting said landscaping for operation and maintenance with such an inclusion. Thank you for your attention to this matter and looking forward to your positive response. Very Truly Yours Robert W. Foulk Pres. PGA West Master Assoc. cc Bill Dodds Alf Board Members Monarch Group Dave Peters 1-9.4 ATTACHMENT 2 KSL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KI City of La Quinta Tom Genovese, City Manager P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 January 28, 2000 RE: Equestrian Trail on the East Side of Madison at PGA WEST Dear Tom: In the past KSL has requested that the City eliminate the requirement of an equestrian trail on the east side of Madison Street adjacent to the PGA WEST community. The surrounding PGA WEST community is not equestrian oriented and it makes little sense to provide an equestrian trail that essentially goes no where. It would, at the earliest, be some distant time before any horses would utilize this trail. The City's general plan requires a "Shady Lane" concept along Madison Street. With the required equestrian trail, sidewalk, and 18" no water zone adjacent to the curb, there is less than 25% of the landscape area for planting. The streetscape looks very austere. We hope that the City will reconsider its position and eliminate the requirement for the equestrian trail along the remaining areas yet to be constructed (eg: Norman and remainder of Madison street south of the Rielly gatehouse). I offer to walk the newly constructed landscape areas with you or anyone on your staff to demonstrate the lack of planting areas resulting from the installation of the equestrian trail. Please advise if I can be of assistance. I can be reached at (760) 564-7164. Very trul y rs, William J. Dodds Vice President WJD: jm cc: PGA WEST Master Association 195 007 ATTACHMENT 3 City Council Minutes 2 February 1, 2000 PUBLIC COMMENT Jim Murphy, 54-580 Riviera, Director of PGA West Master Association, urged the Council to reconsider its requirement for KSL to install an equestrian trail along the east side of Madison Street, stating it severely limits the landscape area and the homeowners association is not willing to assume the liability and maintenance for the trail. He added KSL supports their request and should the City continue to require the trail, they feel it should accept an easement from KSL and assume the responsibility for maintaining it. Council Member Adolph agreed it leaves very little space for landscaping. He also commented the equestrian trail goes across the major entrance to new homes and continues down a sidewalk and handicapped ramp before reaching Avenue 58 where it becomes a safety factor because horses must cross Avenue 58 to reach the Boohoof Trail. He asked that this be directed to staff for a report to Council within the next two weeks. Robert Faulk, President of the PGA West Master Association, advised KSL has agreed to remove the portion of the trail already constructed. Council concurred to direct this matter to. staff for a report back in two weeks. Seth Etin , 78-720 Avenida La Fonda, questioned why the bids were so high on the Calle Rondo rainage Channel Project and suggested the City purchase the building materials and h e a contractor to do the labor. Council Member He erson noted part of the problem is that qualified contractors must meet the City's I al requirements for insurance and bonding. * * * * * * * * * * * Joyce Sivley, 79-775 Westwar o Drive, complimented Senior Engineer John Freeland for his work with the Comm ity on the proposed sewer improvements. She also submitted a petition for formation o an assessment district in the Westward Ho area requested information on the City's s wer subsidy program. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed 196 ATTACHMENT 4 City Council Minutes 12 July 20, 1998 CLOSED SESSION ......... continued 5. Conference with legal counsel pursu to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding existing litigati - La Quinta et al v. REVCO, Case No. CV92-7626RJK. (See Page 20 for announcemen f Closed Session actions.) - None 1. TENTATIVE TRACT 28838 — REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 133.42 ACRES INTO 200 SINGLE-FAMILY AND OTHER COMMON LOTS WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 83-002 AND 90-017 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: KSL LAND CORPORATION. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Ms. di lorio, Planning Manager, advised that this is a request to subdivide 133.42 acres into 200 single-family and other common lots located at the southeast corner of Madison Street and Airport Boulevard, abutting the Nicklaus Resort, and Weiskopf golf courses. The vacant property is zoned residential and subject to the provisions of Specific Plan 83-002 (Amendment No. 3) and Specific Plan 90-017. She advised that the lots range from 12,070 sq. ft. to 32,733 sq. ft. abutting golf course fairways and that an equestrian trail is required along the Madison Street frontage. The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval subject to findings and conditions. In response to Council Member Adolph, Ms. di lorio reviewed the location of the common lots, which will be retained for open space and recreational amenities, and advised that the homeowners association will be responsible for maintaining the equestrian trail along their frontage on Madison Street. Restrooms for the gardeners will be required, but the locations have not yet been determined. 197 009 City Council Minutes 13 July 20, 1998 Council Member Adolph felt it is important to require the restrooms in gated communities and wished to have staff come back with language to that effect, rather than having to add it each time as a condition. Council Member Perkins agreed. Chevis Hosea, 55-920 PGA Boulevard, Vice President of Land and Commercial Development for KSL Land Corporation, advised that they do not have a problem building equestrian trails, but do want to make sure that the trails go somewhere and that a proper maintenance program is in place. Their portion of the trail will be the middle section of a larger trail that could run for several miles and will not be completed until the property to the north is subdivided. In addition, there is some question as to how the Big Horn Sheep issue will affect the equestrian use of the property to the south. They also have some concern about the split rail fencing, which does not go with the rest of their development. He asked that the condition be amended to require them to build a multi -purpose trail (for pedestrian/bike/golf cart use) that would be converted to an equestrian trail once the rest of the equestrian trail has been completed. He further requested that the maintenance of any public -use portion of the equestrian trail be considered the responsibility of the City and not the homeowners association. They are willing to post bonds for the equestrian fence improvements. In regard to the restrooms for gardeners, he advised that they will be centrally located. He asked that Condition No. 32 be amended as they have always used the golf course to capture their storm water, rather than using a retention basin. That would also eliminate the need for Condition No. 38 and the latter part of Condition Nos. 37 and 62, relating to retention basins and quality assurance. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Hosea advised that they usually build unisex restrooms for gardeners on the backside of the mens and womens restrooms at the common pool areas, but since common pool areas do not exist in this development, they will try to design one at the gate entrance and one at the northeast corner wall area. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Hosea advised that a combination of well water and canal water will be used to maintain the water level of the lakes, which will be used to irrigate the golf course. In regard to using reclaimed water, he advised that the front-end costs would make it economically unfeasible for a project this size. In accordance with their agreement with CVWD, they provide one domestic water well for every 400-500 homes. In regard to the conditions of approval related to storm water falling onsite, Ms. di lorio advised that Condition Nos. 32, through 39 could all be deleted,�gg 010 City Council Minutes 14 July 20, 1998 with Condition No. 31 amended to read, ".....according to the approved hydrology plan unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer." Mr. Hosea further asked that they be allowed to use roundabouts as an alternative to installing traffic signals at Madison Street and Airport Boulevard and at the entrance to their project, providing that they can propose a concept acceptable to engineering staff. Council Member Adolph asked what they propose to do with the equestrian trail area along Madison Street. Mr. Hosea advised that they are proposing to build everything, with the exception of the split rail fencing- on the outside of the equestrian trail, which would be constructed if and when the rest of the trail is completed. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that staff has been insistent on this issue because of past history dealings regarding equestrian uses adjacent to residential areas. The intent is to enforce the General Plan policies by getting the equestrian use in place prior to residents moving in and protesting. The applicant is proposing to construct a "multi -use" trail, not an equestrian trail, but staff feels that by labeling it as an equestrian trail, it would eliminate objections in the future by residents who might try to argue that they thought it was a golf cart path. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman advised that equestrian trail signs would eventually be posted, but are not currently required and confirmed that posting of such signs could be an interim alternative to fencing. Council Member Perkins felt if.the trails are not installed and properly identified from the onset of the development, they may never go in because of protests from the residents. Council Member Adolph did not have a problem with the fence being constructed at a later date, advising that the only concerns he has heard are related to keeping the trails clean. Mayor Pena felt signage would be sufficient for now. Council Member Henderson suggested looking at some equestrian -use modifications during the General Plan update and also suggested the possibility of having the equestrian trail be a phase of the project. City Council Minutes 15 July 20, 1998 In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Herman advised that there are a large number of horses in the area and that the purpose of the equestrian trail is to provide them with access to the Boo Hoff Trailhead at Lake Cahuilla. He suggested amending the condition to require KSL to construct the equestrian trail when their properties to the north and south are developed. The trails will then be longer, but still not complete, just as the sidewalk will not be complete. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Herman advised that he is unsure at this time how the Big Horn Sheep issue is going to affect the Boo Hoff Trail. Council Member Sniff felt the equestrian trail should be built up front so that homebuyers are aware of its existence before purchasing their property. Mayor Pena felt it is a matter of how it is phased in, noting that the developer is proposing to construct the trail up front and add the fencing later on. Council Member Sniff did, not have a problem with that as long as the trail is built and clearly identified. Council Member Perkins felt it should be required up front or it will not be done because of residential protests later on. Council Member Adolph felt the trail would not be used until Madison Street is extended through to Avenue 52. There being no one else wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Ms. di lorio reviewed the recommended changes as follows: • Condition Nos. 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 will be deleted and Condition No. 31 amended to read, "The applicant shall comply with provisions of Engineering Design No. 97-03, and the following: storm water falling on site during the peak 24-hour period during a 100-year storm shall be retained within the development according to the approved hydrology plan, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer." • the last sentence in Condition No. 62 will be deleted; • Condition No. 43-C will be amended to require that the fence shall be bonded for and installed at the time of development to the immediate north or south and that signs identifying the equestrian trail shall be installed at the time of the Madison Street improvements; and Zoo 012 City Council Minutes 16 July 20, 1998 • Condition No. 88 will be added to read, "Roundabouts may be considered in lieu of traffic signals at Madison Street and Airport Boulevard and at Madison Street and the development entrance, subject to the approval of the City Engineer." RESOLUTION NO. 98-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 200 SINGLE-FAMILY AND OTHER COMMON LOT SUBDIVISION ON 133.42 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 28838 — KSL LAND CORPORATION). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 98-78 as amended. Council Member Perkins advised that he would support the motion, but was disappointed that total completion of the equestrian trail is not being required up front. Motion carried unanimously. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 98-363 — CONSIDER A MITIGATED EGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, TENTATIVE TRACT 28 7 TO SUBDIVIDE A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 53-UNIT CONDOMINIUM TRAC AP INTO 53 RESIDENTIAL LOTS ON 11.81 ACRES ALONG TORONJA AND AZ AR STREETS WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 85-006, "THE RANCH." APPLICANT: JT HOMES, LLC. Ms. di lorio, Plannin Manager, advised that the proposed subdivision is within the Citrus project of Ranch Specific Plan (formerly Oak Tree West) along Toronja and Azahar street The 53 single-family lots and two lettered lots on 1 1.81 acres will range from 25 sq. ft. to 12,624 sq. ft. and will typically be 55' X 136'. The Planning Corn ' sion has recommended approval subject to findings and conditions. In response to Council Member Adolph, . Vogt, Public Works Director, advised that the applicant's engineering desi will have to comply to an hydrology plan to ensure adequate drainage. Chevis Hosea, 55-920 PGA Boulevard, Vice President of La and Commercial Development for KSL Land Corporation, urged approval of the oject. 20 � 011 ATTACHMENT 5 City Council Resolution 98-78 Adopted: 7/20/98 Page 3 11. The applicant shall create perimeter setback lots, of minimum width as noted, adjacent . to the following street rights of way: A. Madison Street - Twenty feet (20'), from the south boundary of Tract Map 21643 to the south boundary of this Tentative Map. B. Airport Boulevard - Twenty feet along the frontage of this development. Minimum widths may be used as average widths if meandering wall designs are approved. Required setback areas or lots shall apply to all existing and proposed street frontage of the parcel, or parcels being subdivided including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and lots dedicated or deeded to others such as water well and power substation sites. Where public sidewalks or equestrian trails are placed on privately -owned setback lots, t1+a applicant shall dedicate blanket easernea�ts .over the setback lots. 12. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to the following streets from lots abutting the streets: A. Madison Street B. Airport Boulevard Direct access to these streets shall be restricted to those access points as approved by the City. 13. The applicant shall dedicate -any easements necessary for placement of and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, and common areas. 14. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. 15. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media and in a program format acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu choices so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. CONDCCTTM28838(Rei11y)-25 Page 3 40 014 City Council Resolution 98-78 Adopted: 7/20/98 Page 7 30. * The applicant shall comply with the provisions of the Engineering Number 97-03 and the following: 1.1 Stormwater falling on site during the, peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development, and 2.) According to the approved hydrology plan unless otherwise approved by the "City Engineer. UTILITIES 31. All existing and proposed utilities within or, adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 32. In areas where hardscape surface improvements are planned, underground utilities shall be installed prior to construction of surface improvements. The applicant shall provide certified reports of utility trench compaction tests for approval by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 33. The City is contemplating adoption of a major thoroughfare improvement program. If the program is in effect 60 days prior to. recordation of any final map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for any waived final map, the development or portions thereof may be subject to the provisions of the ordinance. If this development is not subject to a major thoroughfare improvement. program, the applicant shall. be responsible for all street and traffic improvements required herein. 34. The following minimum street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Primary Arterial - 1 10' right-of-way) - Construct the east three -quarter's (%) of full right-of-way improvements along the frontage of this Tentative Map, consisting of: half width street improvements (east of centerline) with a six foot (6') wide meandering sidewalk; an eighteen foot (181 wide, raised, landscaped median; and a sixteen foot (16') wide southbound lane adjacent to the west side of the median. 2) Airport Boulevard (Primary Arterial - 110' right-of-way) - Construct the south half M of full right of way improvements along the frontage of this Tentative Map, consisting of: half width street improvements (south of centerline) with a six foot (6') wide meandering sidewalk. The eighteen foot 0 81 wide, raised, landscaped median is deferred for construction by others. B. PRIVATE STREETS AND CULS DE SAC 203 .1) Residential - 36 feet wide if double loaded (building lots on both sides), 32 feet if single loaded CONDCCTTM28838(Reilly)-25 page of City Council Resolution 98-78 Adopted: 7/20/98 Page 8 2) Collector (2:300 homes or 3,000 vehicles per day) - 40 feet wide 3) Cul de sac curb radius - 45 feet I C. + * EQ 1 tFp `I occurs ­___1 1AN TRAIL- The _a applicant shall construct an equestrian trail alon PP q 9 ton "Street frontege ' The f ication and design of the trail shall be by the -C-ity. A' split' rail fence shelf-be''constructed to separate the t tfiatl from, the pedestrian sidewalk and ° perimeter wall in ;e with Rection-'9.140:060 Item E, 3a) :ofAhe Zoning Ordine* strian trail and trail, signs, .except the split rail fence shan Te pry to= -issuance of Certi#icate of -Occupancy f@ .first Bonding for the fence to be installed'shati °be posted prior to final wal. The split rail fence shall be installed at the time development the immediate north or south of this -tract. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 35. Access points and turning movements of traffic shall be restricted as follows: A. Full turning movements shall be allowed at the main gated entrance (Street °Ll located on the east side of Madison Street, approximately one-half mile south of Airport Boulevard. 36. Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings and devices, raised medians. if required, street name signs, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters approved in design and location by the U.S. Post Office and the City Engineer. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 37. The City Engineer may requite improvements extending beyond development boundaries such as, but not limited to, pavement elevation transitions, street width transitions, or other incidental work which will ensure that newly constructed improvements are safely integrated with existing improvements and conform with the City's standards and practices. 38. Improvement plans for all on- and off -site streets and access gates shall be prepared by registered professional engineer(s) authorized to practice in the State of California. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted Standard and Supplemental Drawings and Specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. 39. Street right of way geometry for cuts de sac, knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, #801, and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. C0NDCCTTM28838(Rei11y)-25 Page 8 of 13 City Council Resolution 98-78 Adopted: 7/20/98 Page 11 53. * The subdivider shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing not included in the City's permit inspection program, but which are required by the City to provide evidence that materials and their placement comply with plans and specifications. 54. The applicant shall employ, or retain, California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have -their agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 55. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the plan computer files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -constructed condition. min4 and per maintenance of all i until expressly released fr sal �sponsibiir�y`by 57. Fire hydrants in accordance with Coachella Valley Water District Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection paced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1,500 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 58. Applicant/developer will provide written certification for the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrant(s) are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. 59. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be signed and approved by the registered Civil Engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "Icertify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 60. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. CONDCCTfM28838(ReiUy)-25 205 Page 11 of 13 n1r ATTACHMENT 6 City Council Minutes 17 June 15, 1999 MOTION - It was moved by Council Me hers Sniff/Adolph to table the matter of Specific Plan 83-001 Amendme No. 5 (Century -Crowell Communities). Motion carried with Mayor Pena A ENT. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-77. 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29147, . A REQUEST FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 133 LOTS, A RESIDENTIAL LOT, AND OTHER COMMON LOTS ON 172.88 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 58 IN PGA WEST. APPLICANT: KSL LAND CORPORATION. The Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the proposed tract map creates lots averaging 14,536 sq. ft., and that the Planning Commission has recommended approval, subject to findings and conditions. Council Member Adolph asked if Lots A and J would be gated and used strictly for emergencies, to which Mr. Herman responded yes. isChris Berg, 79-799 Old Avenue 52, of MDS Consulting and representing KSL, advised that they are in agreement with the conditions. They're proposing that the street access points be gated, but there's a possibility that the one on Avenue 58 could be a primary entrance if the tract is not developed by the same developer as the project to the north. In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Berg advised that no pools are planned at this time. There being no one else wishing to speak, the Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 99-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 133 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOT, AND OTHER COMMON LOTS SUBDIVISION ON 172.88 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 58 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29147 - KSL LAND CORPORATION). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 99-79 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Pena ABSENT. 20 OAF I ATTACHMENT 7 Resolution 99-79 TTM 29147/KSL Land Corp. June 15, 1999 Page 3 11. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Madison Street - 20 feet B. Avenue 58 - 20 feet The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 12. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 13. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along those streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map. 14. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 15. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. 16. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the. City's map checker, on storage media and in a program format acceptable to the Ci+-y Engineer. The files shall utilize ,tandard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. 207 P19 Resolution 99.79 TTM 29147/KSL Land Corp. June 15, 1999 Page 10 46. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 47. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 48. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins and common lots. 49. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect and comply with Chapter 8.13 of the Municipal Code. The applicant shall submit off -site landscaping plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City Engineer. 50. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized Nith no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. 51. Perimeter walls and required landscaping for the entire perimeter to be enclosed shall be constructed prior to final inspection and occupancy of any homes within the tract unless a phasing plan, or construction schedule, is approved by the City Engineer. Cw52. The landscape improvements for Madison Street shall be designed to comply with Policy 3 4.1.6 of the General Plan (i.e., Agrarian Image Corridor). 2oa ono 0 • Resolution 99-79 TTM 29147/KSL Land Corp. June 15, 1999 Page 12 61. The subdivider shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing not included in the City's permit inspection program, but which are required by the City to provide evidence that materials and their placement comply with plans and specifications. 62. The applicant shall employ, or retain, California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have their agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the plan computer files previously submitted to the City to reflect the as -constructed condition. MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all required improvements unless and until expressly released from said responsibility by the City. This shall include formation of a homeowner's association or other arrangement acceptable to the City for maintenance of retention basins, common areas and perimeter walls and landscaping. FIRE DEPARTMENT 65. Fire hydrants in accordance with Coachella Valley Water District Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1,000 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 66. Applicant/developer .rill provide written certification for the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrant(s) are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. 209 OPT 0 • Resolution 99-79 TTM 29147/KSL Land Corp. June 15, 1999 Page 14 76. All public agency letters received for this case are made part of the case file documents for plan checking purposes. 77. Applicable conditions of Specific Plans 83-002 (Amendment #3) and 90-017 as amended shall be met prior to building permit issuance. 78. The layout and design of the permanent tract access gates shall be approved by the Community Development Department after review and approval by the Fire Department. 79. The project's Homeowners' Association (HOA) will be organized to administer and maintain common open space, perimeter landscaping, private roads, security, and architectural consistency pursuant Section 12.0 (Phasing and Implementation) of SP 90-017 and as required by SP 83-002. 80. Prior to building permit issuance, housing plans for the tract shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 81. The applicant shall construct an equestrian trail along the Madison Street frontage. The location and design of the trail shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed to separate the equestrian trail from the pedestrian sidewalk and perimeter wall in accordance with Section 9.140.060 (Item E, 3a) of the Zoning Ordinance. The equestrian facilities shall match the improvements being installed for Tract 28838 and be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the first residence. Bonding for the equestrian facilities shall be posted prior to final map approval. ATTACHMENT 8 City Council Minutes 29 September 7 1999 Council Member Sniff stated that he believed adequate signage and cessibility is important. RESOLUTION NO. 99-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF E CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED GATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRO ENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-383 PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 99-036 ROLL/WOODPARK DEVELOPMENT). It was moved by Council Members niff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. 99-110 as submitted. Motion carried u animously. RESOLUTION NO. 99-11 A RESOLUTION OF HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, A ROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 99-036, A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL ELOPMENT ON 36 t ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DUNE LMS ROAD AND HIGHWAY 111 (TROLL/11VOODPARK DEVELOP NT). • It was oved by Council Members Henderson/Adolph to adopt Resolution No. P 99-1 1 as amended, changing eight -foot to six-foot in Condition No. 37-C and de ting Condition No. 68-A (Sign A). Motion carried unanimously. 6. SPECIFIC PLAN 90-015, AMENDMENT NO. 2 - TO APPROVE THE REDUCTION IN DWELLING UNITS FROM 365 TO 320 AND CREATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD, BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET WITHIN THE NORMAN GOLF COURSE. APPLICANT: KSL LAND CORPORATION. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the Specific Plan is located north of Airport Boulevard between Madison Street and Monroe Street, and is within the Norman Golf Course. The amendment reduces the number of allowable units from 365 to 220, and provides for a comprehensive document with development standards for future construction. The Planning Commission has recommended approval subject to findings and conditions, and • has approved Site Development Permit 99-653 for a clubhouse and maintenance facility. 2 1 1` 02.I City Council Minutes 30 September 7, 1999 0 Forrest Haag, 49-999 Eisenhower Drive, of KSL Land Corporation, requested the following changes to the conditions of approval: Condition No. 22 - change 25 feet for Monroe Street to 20 feet; Condition No. 23 - change two residential accesses to three; Condition No. 24-A - delete "approximately 1,000 feet" (they agree the opening to the north should be closed); Condition No. 24-B - add Monroe Street to Airport Boulevard; and Condition No. 26 - change to read, .......1,077 t feet from the centerline of the existing........" In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Haag advised that the tunnel will most likely be under Madison Street, and that it won't affect the layout of the proposed maintenance facility. As for the limited parking facilities, he advised that off -site parking and shuttle service would be utilized if a large golf tournament is hosted. Council Member Adolph felt that it appears that the clubhouse and amenities are designed to accommodate the homeowners and not the residents from the other courses, which is why he felt tunnel access is so important. There being no one else wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 99-112 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SPECIFIC PLAN 90-015 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AIRPORT BOULEVARD, BETWEEN MADISON AVENUE AND MONROE STREET (FORREST HAAG FOR KSL LAND CORPORATION). It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to adopt Resolution No. 99-1 12 as amended, changing the street width for Monroe Street to 20 feet in Condition No. 22; changing the number of accesses to "two" in Condition No. 23; deleting "approximately 1,,000 feet" from Condition No. 24-A; adding Monroe Street to Airport Boulevard in Condition No. 24-13; and changing Condition No. 26 to read, ....... 1,077 t feet from the centerline of the existing......" Motion carried unanimously. 7. ADOPTION OF,, RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN PROPERTIES WCCESSARY TO CONSTRUCT JEFFERSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1 FROM AVENUE 54 TO HIGHWAY 111. The Mayor declared the PUB`.0 HEARING OPEN. 0 ATTACHMENT 9 2.5 CIRCULATION PLAN The proposed circulation system for the Norman Course Specific Plan conforms with the requirements ofthe City ofLa Quinta General Plan - Circulation Element by providing a hierarchy of vehicular traffic -ways with pedestrian -ways segregated within the plan area. The proposed circulation alignment is defined by the proposed golfcourse and ties to existing perimeter streets adjacent to within PGA West and the plan area boundary. The City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element delineates an equestrian overlay which provides for an equestrian trail on the easterly side ofMadison Street. This element is delineated in the Open Space Policy Diagram on page 4-5 of the General Plan and on Exhibit XX, below Secured entries into the residential areas have been located to provide adequate line of sight and optimum traffic ingress and egress from the residential components of the master plan area. Primary Arterial Onsite Collector ` Local Street • • • • • • Equestrian Trail Exhibit 11 Individual driveways are proposed with generous setbacks from entry boulevards, neighborhood loop collectors, and neighborhood streets to further provide safe ingress and egress from the individual residences. 213 2.15 025, i2' ! 14' 1� 13 3' 1 ' Min l2' �. 4 -- +r W. Primary Arterial Typical: Madison/ Airport Onsite Collector Typical: Club Facilities Entry Drive 14' 14' 5' CU.F.. Minimum Local Street 2.17 -Z14 026 Tit�t 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Consideration of a Letter of Intent to Seek Annexation From The Village at the Palms, a Golf/Residential Development Located West of Monroe Street and South of Airport Boulevard RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: A property owner located within the City's Sphere of Influence west of Monroe Street and south of Airport Boulevard is requesting the City to annex their 200 acres (Attachment 1). The general area, south of Airport Boulevard, north of Avenue 58, west of Monroe Street ar)d east of the existing City limits contains a total of 276 acres. Annexing the applicant's property would leave 76 acres remaining in the County. Staff recommends contacting these property owners to see if they would like to be included in this annexation. By including the remaining 76 acres in this annexation it would square the eastern boundary (Attachment 2). If authorized, staff would start the annexation process. The property owners would be required to file a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Environmental Assessment. A public hearing would then be held before the Planning Commission and City Council to determine the land use designation and zoning for the property to be annexed. Following Council authorization, staff would prepare and submit the annexation report and petition to LAFCO for their review and approval. The entire process can take six months to a year to complete. 20 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH. Annexation. wpd FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Authorize staff to begin the annexation process for the property located at the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Airport Boulevard; or 2. Do not authorize staff to begin the annexation process; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Jetry Herrhan C mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by, Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Letter of Intent from The Village at the Palms 216 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH.Annexation. wpd ATTACHMENT 1 V1L�4GE ATT418 PALMS Mr. Jerry Herman, Director Community Development Department CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Bog 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Jerry: REcEivE r-I\ JAA' j 2000 Happy New Year! I hope this letter finds you in excellent health and good spirits! We are doing very well in this new millennium and I wanted to make good on the promise I made you last fall. The Village at The Palms and The Palms Golf Club, all 200 acres of us, would like to formally request annexation into the City of La Quinta as soon as possible. I realize this takes a few steps to accomplish and I am taking the first one, hopefully! I know that the city is in the due diligence process for annexation of acreage out this way and I want to be sure that you are aware we are very supportive of those endeavors. I have spoken with a number of other property owners in the area and they are equally as interested in taking advantage of this wonderful opportunity. If there is something I can do to facilitate your process, please feel free to let me know! Please let me know what my next step should be and what the plans are for getting us into the city. It would be greatly appreciated if you are aware of any economies of saving we might achieve with this process. Thanks for your help and I look forward to hearing from you soon! Regards, e � Terrie Miller Project Director cc: John Pena 81.771 Airport Boulevard. La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone (760) 564-8929 Pax (760) 399-1463 217 u04 ATTACHMENT 2 TW�t °F 4Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Consideration of a Request to Waive the Undergrounding of Utility Lines for Rancho La Quinta RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 1-5- CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The City Council on January 18, 2000, received written correspondence from Rancho La Quinta (Attachment 1) requesting the Council waive the conditions for undergrounding of utilities in the Rancho La Quinta tracts. The City Council directed staff to agendize this matter to determine if there is an interest by the City Council to act upon this type of waiver (Attachment 2). There are approximately 63,400 lineal feet (12.0 mi.) of joint -use 92 Kv power lines in the City of La Quinta. Joint -use means that in addition to the 92 Kv power transmission lines attached to the utility poles that transmit electric power between power substations, the poles also have other utilities attached to them. The other utilities include: telephone, TV cable, and 12 Kv distribution power lines. All of the utilities in the latter category can be undergrounded. The 92 Kv power transmission lines in the first category cannot be underground because Imperial Irrigation District has informed the City that their agency is not equipped to maintain underground power lines with voltage exceeding 34.5 Kv. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH Undergrounding Rpt.wpd 219 The requirement to underground all utilities with voltage less than 34.5 Kv has been a standard requirement. The status of 12.0 miles 92 Kv transmission lines can be broken into four basic categories: 1. 20% of the land adjacent to the 92 Kv transmission line alignment has been developed and the City has no opportunity to obtain underground facilities at developer expense. 2. 9% of the land adjacent to the 92 Kv transmission line alignment is being developed and has the standard condition regarding undergrounding of utilities under 34.5 Kv, but no performance bonds were obtained when the final map was approved to ensure satisfaction of the requirement. 3. 18% of the land adjacent to the 92 Kv transmission line alignment is being developed in phases and the City has opportunity to obtain underground facilities at developer expense in future phases. 4. 53% of the land adjacent to the 92 Kv transmission line alignment remains to be developed. Rancho La Quinta fits into the second category mentioned above. The City .Attorney has determined that granting such a waiver would require the applicant to seek amendments to the Specific Plan and Tract Maps within Rancho La Quinta to eliminate the condition requiring such undergrounding. Section 120.6 Waiver of Chapter 8.030 of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code permits the Council to waive the provisions of undergrounding after making a finding that the application of the undergrounding is unreasonable, impractical and causes undue hardship to the applicant or the public. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Reject the request as submitted by Rancho La Quinta; or 2. Instruct the applicant to prepare and submit the necessary amendments for the Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan and Tract Maps; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 224 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH Undergrounding Rpt.wpd Respectfully submitted, Heftan, Community Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Letter from Rancho La Quinta dated January 5, 2000 2. City Council Minutes of January 18, 2000 221 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH Undergrounding Rpt.wpd v U 3 ATTACHMENT 1 RANCHO LA QUINTA January 5, 2000 COUNTRY C LUB Community Development Department City of La Quinta 48-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Mr. Jerry Herman Dear Sir: In accordance with the City of La Quinta Codes, Chapter 8.03 (Electric Code), Article 120-6, T.D. Desert Development L.P. hereby respectfully requests a waiver of conditions included in the below listed tentative tract map which require certain utility lines to be removed from power poles and placed underground. Tentative Tract 29457 The utility lines in question run along Ave. 48 from Adams Street to Jefferson, along Jefferson from Ave. 48 to our southeastern property boundary (approximately 2/3 ;61e),arO,along Ave. 50 from.pur property boundary directly across Ave. 50 from Orchard sane to,our southwestern boundary (approximately 1/2 mile). The poles in these locations'have both high voltage and low voltage electric lines along with telephone and cable TV lines. The Imperial Irrigation District will not allow us to underground the high voltage lines. Therefore, if we underground the above described utility lines, except for the high voltage electric lines, the power poles and high voltage electric lines will remain overhead and the result will be little or no improvement to the street scene. Undergrounding the Ave. 48 lines would cost over $1,150,000 according to the Imperial Irrigation District. At this rate, the cost to underground all the above mentioned power lines for the entire Rancho La Quinta project would be in excess of $2,000,000. This is an extremely large expenditure for little or no benefit. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Mighael E,Hulme: ralgetMan�gerTroject IVIar}a HOME -OP 222 6 7 8 vt)cJ 79-285 RANCHO LA QUINTA DRIVE • LA QUINTA, CA 92253 • 760-777-7747 • FAX 760-777-7787 City Council Minutes '0 Tj 4�•�_ 1. 2. 3. 1. q ATTACHMENT 2 2 January 18, 2000 LETTER REGARDING DONAP01 OF A TREE AT THE LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER IN MEMORY OF YDEN BOWER. Council concurj:e1d'to consider this request under Business Session Item No. 7. TWO LETTERS REQUESTING WAIVER OF CONDITIONS FOR UNDER - GROUNDING OF UTILITIES IN RANCHO LA QUINTA TRACTS. Council Member Adolph asked if a policy has been established for developers to pay for undergrounding of utility lines once IID.gives their approval, to which Community Development Director Herman responded no. City Attorney Honeywell advised a revision of the conditions of approval requires the tract maps to go back before the Planning Commission and City Council. Council concurred to direct staff to agendize this matter to determine if there is an interest in acting upon this type of waiver. LETiTR REGARDING COMMITTEE ON EXPANSION OF THE HISTORICAL museum. Council oncurred to direct staff to bring back a status report at the next Council eting on the negotiation process before moving forward with forming a sub-com ittee. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JANUARY 18, 2000. APPROVAt OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1999. 223 U06 Ok •�O u �4 OF T1c�AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Prototypical Street STUDY SESSION: Improvements and Details of Amenities to be PUBLIC HEARING: Installed, Project No. 98-19, Phase VI Improvements Continue this item to the March 7, 2000 City Council Meeting. None. None. None. Respectfully submitted, Vbl'sic �R Vogt Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: r1—,4 /e'o�� /. Thomas P. Genovese City Manager 224 T:\PW DEPT\COUNCIL\continuation. wpd T4ty4 4 Qum& COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Approval to Increase the City Manager's Authority to Execute Contract Change Orders on the Jefferson Street Project, Phase I (Highway 1 1 1 to Avenue 54) to an Amount Not to Exceed $100,000 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: / CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve an amendment to the City of La Quinta Change Order Policy; and approve an increase in the City Manager's authority to execute construction contract change orders up to $100,000.00 for the Jefferson Street Phase I Improvements. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: If approved, this increase in the City Manager's authority will better enable staff and contractors to meet construction schedules and save delay and standby costs during construction of the Jefferson Street project. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: During the July 17, 1997 City Council meeting, the City Council adopted a policy regarding the execution of construction change orders. According to the existing policy, the City Manager is authorized to execute construction change orders up to an amount not to exceed $25,000. This is known as a signature change order. Every change order in excess of $25,000 must be brought forward for City Council's approval prior to implementation. Although this method is used by many jurisdictions, there is no current law in the Public Contract Code or the City Municipal Code setting these limitations. During the February 1, 2000 City Council meeting, the City Council expressed concern with the limitations of this policy as it affects Phase I of the Jefferson Street Improvements. Considering the dynamics of the Jefferson Street construction project, the existing limitation may potentially impact project scheduling and increase project costs. 245 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215f.wpd Change orders range from owner requested changes to unforseen conditions encountered in the field. Since many of these changes are not planned, they affect the schedule of the work, and in many cases, must be completed immediately so the schedule may proceed. By the current policy, any changes exceeding an estimated amount of $25,000 must be placed on the City Council Agenda. This could result in a delay in the contract for one to two weeks until the City Council considers the change. This could subject the City to delay claims for contractor standby charges and increase the time for project completion. In order to reduce the exposure for the City, it is recommended that the City Manager's signature authority on individual change orders associated with the Phase I of the Jefferson Street Improvements be increased to $100,000. This authorization will provide the flexibility to enable construction to be completed within the schedule while impacting the budget to the least extent possible. The accumulated amount of change orders will be limited to the amount of contingency appropriated at award of the contract. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the City of La Quinta Contract Change Order Policy is presented as Attachment 1. The proposed amendment adds the following item to the existing policy: W. The City Council may authorize higher Contract Change Order approval authority to the City Manager on a project by project basis. " This project is being completed under a Reimbursement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of La Quinta, City of Indio, County of Riverside, and Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). City staff has contacted representatives from each jurisdiction. According to the Indio City Engineer, the Indio City Council delegates the authorityto the City Engineer to issue and approve any and all Change Orders up to the identified contingency amount which ranges from 10% to 15% of the construction cost of each project. The City of Indio City Council does not require additional approval unless the established contingency budget has been depleted. The cooperative agreement designated the City of La Quinta with the responsibility and authority to deliver all necessary improvements. The Indio City Engineer stated that the City of Indio would not require additional approval over and above that approved by the City of La Quinta. Amendment No. 2 of the Reimbursement Agreement and MOU, executed on July 26, 1999, provides that CVAG will pay 100% of the allowable project costs for the City of Indio's portion of the project. 226 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215f.wpd 1002 The Reimbursement Agreement and MOU states "Lead agency shall have complete control as to the disbursement of the funds. Notwithstanding, the lead agency shall provide CVAG with a monthly accounting with all supporting documents by the 15" workday of each month showing all disbursements..." CVAG's representative informed City staff that CVAG's interpretation is to include all eligible costs up to the stated agreement amount. Amendment No. 2 to the Reimbursement Agreement and MOU allocates a total cost to this project including final design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction at $15,061,660 ($698,437 is for final design engineering services and $14,363,223 is for construction). The amount of the bid awarded for this contract is $6,866,566. According to the CVAG representative, CVAG does not require any additional approval over the amount approved by the City of La Quinta, unless the actual cost exceeds the amount allocated in the budget as part of Amendment No. 2. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an amendment to the City of La Quinta Change Order Policy; and approve an increase in the City Manager's authority to execute construction contract change orders up to $100,000.00 for the Jefferson Street Phase I Improvements; or 2. Do not approve an amendment to the City of La Quinta Change Order Policy; and do not approve an increase in the City Manager's authority to execute construction contract change orders up to $100,000.00 for the Jefferson Street Phase I Improvements; or 3. Provide alternative direction to staff. Respectfully submitted, Chris A. Vogt, rE. Public Works Director/City Engineer Approved for submission by: "Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment 1: Contract Change Order Policy 227 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215f.wpd , 1 I / 3 ATTACHMENT 1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER POLICY PURPOSE: To establish a policy for the execution of construction contract change orders. POLICY: 1) The City Manager is authorized to execute construction change orders according to the following schedule: A. For contracts under $100,000, up to 10% of the contract cost. B. For contracts $100,000 and over, up to $25,000. 2) Under no circumstances shall any contract change orders be approved by the City Manager that exceeds the total budget appropriation for a specific project. 3) Irrespective of the magnitude of a given contract change order, the City Manager is expected to exercise good judgement and present the change order to the City Council if it alters the intent and/or adds or deletes some project activity which might be considered controversial. 4) The City Council may authorize higher contract change order approval authority to the City Manager on a project by project basis. 2.28 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\000215f.wpd 0 `, `.' COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Consideration of an Appointment of Two City Council Members to Serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 9 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Appoint two City Council Members to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee to select Civic Center Art during the La Quinta Arts Festival, and authorize spending up to 10% over the $7,500 amount budgeted, if needed, and appropriate funds. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The sum of $7,500 has been budgeted in the Civic Center Art Purchase Account #101-101-703-899. Authorization to spend up to 10% over the $7,500 available would allow Committee Members discretion in selecting art work that is just above the actual budgeted amount. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. I I-EW K�9101 i! I O7_\ i! I � Since 1989, the City has been selecting art work from the La Quinta Arts Festival (Festival) to be displayed at City Hall. Two City Council Members in conjunction with two Members of the Cultural Arts Commission will view the art work at the Festival, which will be held March 16-191 2000, for consideration of art purchases for City Hall. Historically, the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee has met the first day of the Festival, selected a piece of artwork for the Civic Center, and the art work has been delivered after the Festival. The following City Council members have participated on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee: 1999 Council Members Adolph and Sniff 1998 Mayor Pena and Mayor Pro Tern Henderson 1997 Council Members Adolph and Sniff 1996 Council Members Adolph and Henderson 1995 Council Members Cathcart and Perkins 1994 Mayor Pena and Council Member Sniff The Cultural Arts Commission will select two representatives at their February 10 meeting. Staff will provide a verbal report at the February 15 City Council meeting as to the two Cultural Arts Commissioners selected to participate in this year's selection of art work for City Hall. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Appoint two City Council members to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee to select Civic Center Art during the La Quinta Arts Festival, and authorize spending up to 10% over the $7,500 amount budgeted, if needed, and appropriate funds; or 2. Do not participate in this year's selection of art work for City Hall; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, die HorAzAommunity Services Director Approved for submission by: xg� Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 00121 S:\Community Services\CCReports\CC.029.wpd T4ht 4 4& Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution in Support of Proposition 14, California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 9 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 14, California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City received a letter dated February 8, 2000 from the County of Riverside asking for the City to support Proposition 14, California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 (Attachment 1). The California legislature enacted Senate Bill 3 (Rainey and Burton) last year which was the enabling legislation to place Proposition 14 on the March ballot. The City has previously supported Senate Bill 3 and its predecessor, Senate Bill 2026. The League of California Cities officially supports Proposition 14. The purpose of the pending legislation, scheduled for voter consideration on March 7, 2000, is to authorize $350 million in general obligation bonds for library construction and renovation. If approved by the voters, Proposition 14 will be the enabling legislation for a grant program to construct new libraries and/or remodel 2 3� existing libraries. The City's intent would be to apply for grant funds as appropriate and in accordance with the City Council's direction. The enclosed correspondence from the County provides additional background information. Proposition 14 is scheduled for consideration by California voters on March 7, 2000. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council supporting Proposition 14, California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution supporting Proposition 14, California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submit d, Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst City Manager's Office Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Correspondence from County of Riverside dated February 8, 2000 Slcitymgt\CAROL BENFORD\PR0P0SMTI0N14LIBRARVBOND 02-15-OO.wpd 231 O \/ RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 14 - CALIFORNIA READING AND LITERACY IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 2000 WHEREAS, public libraries are a supplement to the formal system of free public education and deserve adequate financial support from government at all levels; and, WHEREAS, a viable statewide system of public libraries is essential to assist the schools, support children and to serve the general public in all local communities; and, WHEREAS, community public libraries are an important partner in providing a quality education for children and ensuring lifelong learning opportunities for all citizens; and, WHEREAS, the public interest is served by providing adequate resources to properly fund public facilities and services; and, WHEREAS, local public libraries throughout California need additional funding for the construction of new libraries and for the expansion and renovation of existing library facilities to better serve their communities; and, WHEREAS, the California State Library recently conducted a statewide survey which identified a need for over 425 local library projects at a cost in excess of $2 billion; and, WHEREAS, first priority is given to projects which are joint ventures between public libraries and the schools; and, WHEREAS, the California State Legislature and the Governor approved SB3, the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, authorizing $350 million in State bonds to fund grants on a 65% state - 35% local match basis; and, WHEREAS, this measure will appear on the March 7, 2000 statewide ballot as Proposition 14, and, if approved by the California voters, will provide significant funding to address California's public library construction needs. 23?. 003 Resolution 2000- February 15, 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1 . The City of La Quinta hereby supports Proposition 14 - California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 151h day of February 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOH,N J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney C:\MyData\WPDocs\RESOLUTIONS\PROPOSITION14LIBRARYBOND 02-15-OO.wpd 23 l FEB-08-00 TUE 12:57 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 ATTACHMENT 1 River -ride Couraty Executive Office Fcbniary 8, 2000 Mr. Mary Weiss Assistant City Manager P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mark: The Board of Supervisors voted can January 3, 2000, to support the passage of Larry Parrish County Executive 0tricer of 2000, If approved by the voters, this bond act will authorize local libraries to apply for state grants or between $50,000 to $20,000,000 for the construction, remodeling and repair of library facilities. If received, these grants can provide up to 65 l of the total funding for approved projects. The local match required is only 35 %. Since the City of La Quinta is considering the construction of a new library, the City may want to consider supporting Proposition 14. I am enclosing the following information that you may find useful.' 1) Copy or the Board action supporting Proposition 14, 2) A brief informational sheet about Proposition 14, 3) A sample resolution supporting Proposition 14, 4) A list of Proposition 14 supporters, and 5) Copies of articles from California Libraries (including one about Riverside County)_ If you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact me directly at (909) 955-1111. I am also willing to speak to your Council about Proposition 14. Sincerely, r�Cl"l Gary M. Ch stmas County Librarian Enclosures 234 Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center 4080 Lemon :street • 12th Floor • Riverside, California 92501 + (909) 955-1100 0 FAX (909) 955-1105 006 02-08-00 12:53 RECEIVED FROM:1 P.g2 FEB-08-00 TUE 12:58 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. 1 SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA w� U) v th C r- U U ■ FROM: COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE SUBMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 State Legislative Platform P. 03 4�"yI r + O ^I � 1 RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the Board approve the Inland Empire and Riverside County Legislative Platforms and receive and file the San Bernardino County Legislative Platform and direct the Executive Office and the County's Sacramento representatives to advance the legislative proposals contained therein. BACKGROUND: Each year, the Board of Supervisors adopts a legislative platform to guide the legislative advocacy efforts in the upcoming year. During 1999, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties consolidated their legislative representation in Sacramento to raise the visibility of the Inland Empire at the State level. The 20OU Legislative Platform is comprised of three sections: The Inland Empire Legislative Platform, the Riverside County Legislative Platform, and the San Bernardino Legislative Platform. The Inland Empire section contains legislative proposals to address issues common to both counties. The Riverside and San Bernardino sections are specific to each county. Adoption of the 2000 Legislative Platform will allow the Boards' legislative representatives to advance their policy/legislative agenda(s)_ BARBARA DUNMORE Administrative Manager FINANCIAL DATA: N/A CURRENT YEAR COST $ ANNUAL COST S NET COUNTY COST IN CURRENT YEAR BUDGET: YES/ NO/ BUDGET ADJUSTMENT: YES/ NO/ FOR FY: SOURCE OF FUNDS: C.E.O. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE prev. Agn. ref. FORM 11 V4ay. 9190) 02-08-00 12:53 Executive Dist. ALL AGENDA NO. s 007 0 RECEIVED FROM:1 p.03 FEB-08-00 TUE 12:58 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 P. 04 _- - )NLA At, FMP,/RE LEGJS_ TI �/ = PLA rQRM Proposition 14, The California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 ISSUE: Proposition 14, if passed by the voters, would enact the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 which would authorize $350 million in general obligation bonds fore library construction and renovation. The act establishes priority projects as joint use projects that are constructed on or adjacent to public schools. Second priority would be joint use projects that are not on or adjacent to school property and lastly, all other library projects. POSITION: Support Proposition 14 on the March 7, 2000 ballot. BACKGROUND Existing law establishes the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988, which authorized the issuance pursuant to State General Obligation Bond law of bonds in the amount of $75 million for the purpose of financing a library construction and renovation program. These funds have been completely expended for 24 authorized projects. Over $100 million of project applications did not receive funding under this bond act. Last year, the State Library performed a public library facilities need assessment and found that there is a statewide need for 425 projects totaling $2 billion. During the 1999 Legislative session, the Legislature enacted SB 3, the enabling legislation which authorized Proposition 14 to be placed on the March 7, 2000 ballot. Senate Pro Tempore John Burton, principal co-author of SB 3 has stated, "We are long overdue in allowing the people to have a voice in the destiny of their libraries. Libraries are the cornerstone of the education system, without which the system fails." The Riverside and San Bernardino County Boards of Supervisors support Proposition 14. This measure would begin the important process of expanding access to reading and literacy programs in California's public education system and access to public libraries for all California residents. 2 3 r) 23 008 02-08-60 12'53 RECEIVED FROM:1 p.gq. FEB-08-00 TUE 12:58 PM RIV 00 EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 P. 05 Proposition 14 The Statewide Bond For Literacy and Libraries On the !March 7, 2000 Statewide Ballot Proposition 14, slated for the March 7, 2000 ballot, provides $350 million in bond money for building new libraries, repairing existing facilities, upgrading telecommunications and electrical systems, improving study conditions, and creating a safe, comfortable environment for library users_ What is Proposition 14? As California's population continues to climb, library visits have skyrocketed statewide. Many communities have no local library, and others have facilities that are old, worn and out-of-date. In 1998, the State Library surveyed public libraries to determine construction and renovation needs. The survey identified 425 needed projects at a cost of approximately $2 billion. This prompted the introduction of Senate Bill 3, which passed both houses of the State Legislature with solid bi-partisan suppon, and was signed by the Governor. This $350 million bond measure - now called Proposition 14 - is on the March 7, 2000 Statewide ballot. What Are the Major provisions of Proposition 14? • Authorizes libraries to apply for state grants of between $50,000 and $20,000,000 for the construction, remodeling or repair of library facilities. • Establishes first priority funding for joint -use projects where there is a cooperative agreement between libraries and schools. • Provides up to 65% in state bond funding for approved projects, with a required 35% local match. What Can Proposition 14 Funds Be Used for? • site acquisition • new building construction • remodeling/renovating existing public library facilities, or convening other facilities to public libraries • upgrading telecommunications and electrical systems to accommodate technology • purchasing of furniture and equipment 237 009 02-@8-0@ 12:54 RECEIVED FROM:1 p.95 FEB-08-00 TUE 12:59 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 Sample Resolution Proposition 14 — California. Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000 WHEREAS, public libraries are a supplement to the formal system of free public education and deserve adequate financial support from government at all levels; and WHEREAS, a viable statewide system of public libraries is essential to assist the schools, support children and to serve the general public in all local communities; and W.IM-MAS, community public libraries are an important partner in providing a duality education for children and ensuring lifelong learning opportunities for all citizens, and WHEREAS, the public interest is served by providing adequate resources to properly fund public library facilities and services; and WHEREAS, local public Iibraries throughout California need additional funding for the construction of new libraries and for the expansion and renovation of existing library facilities to better serve their communities, and WEI REAS, the California State Library recently conducted a statewide survey which identified a need for over 425 local library projects at a cost in excess of $2 billion; and WI-IIrREAS, first priority is given to projects which are joint ventures between public libraries and the schools; and WHEREAS, the California State Legislature and the Governor approved SB3, the California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2000, authorizing $350 million in State bonds to fund grants on a 65% state — 35% local match basis; and WHEREAS, this measure will appear on the March 7, 2000 statewide ballot as Proposition 14, and, if approved by California voters, will provide significant funding to address California's public library construction needs; NOW, TFIERET�ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE (NAME OF AGENCY) that the (name of agency) endorses Proposition 14 on the March 7, 2000 ballot, encourages voters in the (city/county) to vote in favor of this measure and directs the (city/county) Clerk (or appropriate officer) to forward a copy of this Resolution at the earliest possible date after its adoption to the (California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities, the California Contract Cities Association or Independent Cities Association., school association, etc, — as appropriate). 02-08-00 12:54 RECEIVED FR0M:1 2a3 010 FEB-08-00 TUE 12:69 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 P. 07 Proposition 14 List of endorsements (Partial List) 21-7100 Alameda Boys and Girls Club Alameda City Council Al;aineda County Board of Supervisors Alameda County Democratic Party Alameda County Library Foundation Alameda County Moyor's Conference Alameda County Office of Education Alameda Frcc Library Board Alameda Free Library Foundation Alaineda Unified School District Board Albany Library Board American Association of Retired Persons (HARP) American Association of University Women of California Aincrican Canyon City Council American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) B,aynet Belvedere -Tiburon Library Agency Benicia City Council Berkeley City Council Board of Directors of the Castro Valley Chamber of Commerce Board orTnLglc cs of the Alhambra Public Library Calabasas City Council California Chamber of Corrunerce California City Librarians Association California County Librarians Association California Faculty Association California Federation of Teachers California Labor Fc dcration, AFL-CIO California Library Association California School Boards Association California School Finployces Association Californi�l Stalc Council of Service Employees California State Association of Counties (CSAC) California State SbcrifFs Associalion (CSSA) California State Student Association (CSSA) California Teachers Association Calisloga City Council Crrnrrpboll Cily Council Castro Valley Democratic Club Castro Valley Library Advisory Committee Citizens in Action for Local Libraries (CAT.I,) City Council, City of National City City Council, City of Redondo Bc;lch City of Buellton City of Monrovia City of Morgan Hill (:ity of Rcdondo Beach City of Santee Coalition for Adequate School Housing Congress of California Scniors Contra Costa County Democratic Party Contra (Asti Taxpayers Association Demos Democratic Club of Hayward District Council of Iron Workers of the State of California and Vicinity Engineers & Scientists of CA, Local 20 Fremont Library Advisory Commission Fresno Area Library Council Fresno Chamber of Commerce Friends and Foundation of San Francisco Public Library Friends of the Alhambra Library Friends of the Auberry Library Friends of the Berkeley Public Library Friends of the Canyon Hill Library (FOCAL) Friends of the Castro Valley Library Friends of Castroville Library Friends of Corse Madera Library Friends of the Covina, Public Library Fricnds of the Davis Public Library Friends of the Dublin Library Friends of the Eastlake Library Friends of the Fairfield & Suisun City Libraries Friends of the Fresno County Public Library Friends of the Glendale Public Library Friends of the Hayward Public Library Friends of the Library, El Dorado Hills Branelt Friends of (lie Manteca Library Fricnds of the Marin County Frcc Library Friends of the Pack�rrd Library of Yuba County Friends of the Palo Alto Public Library Fricnds of the Pasadena Public Library Friends.of the Redwood City Library Friends of the Reedley Library Friends of the Sacramento Public Library Friends of the S,in Benito County Free library Fricnds and Foundation of the &In Francisco Public Library Friends of the, Sxnvi Cruz Public Library Friends of the Santa Monica Public Library Friends of [lie Sausalito Lib Tnry Friends of the Yuba County Library Friends of the Vacaville Library Friends of Vallejo Public Library 1• lerton Public Library Gcnctcch, Inc. Glendale City Council Glendale Chamber oC Commerce Group 4 Architcclure, Rcscarcli ,+- Planning, inc. Hayward Democratic Club 23� Oil 02-0B-00 12:55 RECEIVED FR0M:1 P•07 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:00 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. I P. 08 Kern County Friends of the Library, Tebalchapi and Fraz-icr Park Branches Library 2000, Alaineda Library Friends of San Diego County, Inc - Lodi Public Library Lodi Unified School District Long Bcacli Public Library Foundation Los Angeles City Council Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Los Angeles Counly Library Commission Los Angcics County Democratic Party M-Mcra County Friends of the IATary Marin County Library Foundation Monterey City C(mricil Monterey Public I.ibr)ry Napa City -County Public Library Founda don Napa County Board of Supervisors Oceanside City Council Oceanside Public Library Palos Verdes Library District Board of Trustees Penninsula Library Foundation Riverside County Board of Supervisors Rolling Readers USA, Inc_ Rtlndlell's Country Corncr Workshoppe San Benito Counly Board of Supervisors Saar Bernardino County Board of Supervisors San Bruno City Council Santa Cnt? Board of Supervisors San Diego Taxpayers Association San Dicguito Union High School District San Francisco Public Libraary Commission San Francisco City/County Board of Supervisors San Lorenzo Unified School District San Luis Obispo City-Counly Library San Mateo Public Library Board of Trustees Sin Mateo Public I .ibrary Foundation Santa Clair County Board of Supervisors Service Ewployccs Inlernational Union, 1-mil 1280 Solano County Board of Supervisors Solano County Library Advisory Council South Bay Cities Council of Govenunents South San Francisco Friends of the Library Stale Building and Construction Trades Council of California), AFL-CIO Stockton City Council Stockton Chamber of Cornincrcc The Board of Libmry Commissioners of the Los Angeles Public Library The San Jose Public Library Foundation I- kith Valley Friends of the Library Vacavillc Unified School District/Library District Board Vacaville Library Commission Vallejo City Council Vallejo Library Advisory Board West Hollywood City Council Whinier Chamber of Commerce Whittier City Council Woodland City Council Yourrtville Town Council U.S. Senator Barbana Boxer Lt, Gov. Cruz Buslxmante Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin Stale Treasurer, Phil Angelidcs Johan Mebs, Member, Board of Equaliraliori Sen. Richard Alarcon (D) Sen, Deirdre Alpert (D) Senator Wes Cbeslbro (U) Sen. Jim Costa (D) Sen, Torn Hayden (D) Sen, David Kelly (R) Sen, Richard Polnnco (D) Sen, Richard Rainey (R) Sen. Admn Schiff (D) Sen. Jolm Vasconcellos (D) Assernblyinember Elaine Alquist (D) Assembly Member Dennis Cardona (D) Assernblywontaa Susan Davis (D) Assemblywoman Helen Thomson (D) Councilnrcinber Marry Mathis, San Diego Councilmcmbcr Jolur Rundlett, Suisun Councilwoman Mischa Slade, Vacaville Juan Alvernaz, Vice President, Tracy Fc cral Bank, Castro Valley Jcanee Amos, Library Director, El Dorado County Alfred Bonnet, Library Consultant, California Swic Library Alan Bersin, Superintendent, San Diego United School District Don Brown, President, CA Organization of Police and Sheriffs Stephanie Beverage, Librarian, City of Alhambra Maurice. Caaldcron Dale Carlson, Vice President, Pacific Exchange Joseph Cislowski, Library Commissioner, Comity of Los Angeles, Wcsi Hollywood Library Committee Linda Crowe, President, California) Library Association James Dam, President, Library of California Board Ray Dezember, Businessman Gail Dryden, President, League of Women Voters of California Victoria Fong, Library of Cali fornia Board member Jack Fonuair Libraarian, San Diego Community College District Fred Gaines, Calabasais Library Cortunissioncr Becky Hcins, Ccrtii"ied Public Accouni nt John Kallenberg, Library of California Board member Joiiinc Kennedy, Library of Califortua Board mcmbcr Donna Linton, Alameda County Assistant County Administrator Mario Machado, Broadcaster Fred Main, California Chamber of Cormucrce Judy Nadlor, Mayor of Santa Clam Ruth Nagler, Coordinator, Pennisula Library System ZQ0. 912 02-08-00 12:55 RECEIVED FROM:1 P.08 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:00 PM RIV 00 EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. I P. 09 Mary Panickcr, Library of California Board Mcmber 1-arry C. Rcider, Kern County Superintendent of Schools Pctcr Joscph Roscnwild, Librarian, County of Los Angeles Public Library Larry 1✓_ Reider, Kcrn County Superinwndcat of Schools Leslie Rothwell, Principal, Castro Valley High School Ruth Shminon, Whittier Collcgo Trustee Both Shedden, Wetland Construction, Owner Paula SLnpson, City of Monterey Carol Starr, Librariaq County of Marin Susan Slci ibauser, Library of California Board member Susan Swisher, Serra Cooperative Library System Sally Tuttle, L.ibrnry of California Dick Walcrs, Providence Associates, Inc. Lois Wellington, President, Congress of CA Seniors Calvin Wilhite, Toxicologist, State of California Peg Yorkin, Chair, Feminist Majorily Foundation Caprice Young, Los Angcics Unified School District, Board of Education Membcr r_1.1 i 241 02-08-00 12:56 RECEIVED FROM:1 P•09 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:01 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 P. 10 � , s � )9�& 0 California Libraries January 2000 A publication of the California Library Association Vol. 10, No. 1 March Ballot Initiative Public libraries in California Stand to gain $350 million in new funding for library renovation and for new construction. Proposition 14, The California beading and Literacy improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Mond Act of 2000, will be put to voters on March 7, 2000. To be eligible to vote in the March election, California residents must he registered as voters no later than February 7, 2000. The last statewide bond issue was in1988, when Californians approved $75 million in state bonds. The 1968 bond issue funded 241lbrary projects, which hardly began to address the need at that time_ In 1998, the State Library surveyed public libraries to determine facility needs. They were able to document 425 needed projects, Lit a cost of $2 billion. As a result of the study, Senator Richard Rainey, along with Senators John Burton and Dede Alperr, sponsored 5133, a $1 billion bond measure, during the last legislative session. With the active participation of many CLk inernbers, and the hard work of CLA lobbyists Michael and Christine Dillon, S133 became f roposl- tion 14 with a renegotiated fu riding level of $35o million. The need for new and renovated libraries is well known to the library community, Like many other community services, libraries have not been able to keep up with population growth in California. As a result, there are neighborhoods and communities, where population has grown significantly, that do not have a local library. This lack of access makes it difficult for children and people with limited mobility to take advantage of important library services. Other communities rely on old library structures, sortie built prior to 1930. These older facilities need to be expanded, made more efficient and upgraded to provide for technology. The numerous projects identi- fied in the Slate Library survey shows the state's library infrastructure needs to be addressed now to bring California libraries into the. 21st Century. Bond proponents see Proposition 14 as an investment in literacy and learning, as well as libraries. They note that public libraries traditionally serve as centers of lifelong learning and literacy. f.ibrarles provide a safe plate for students to learn and complete homework assignments, and for adults to gain practical skills through a variety of adult learning opportunities_ Since the bond can fund 6S'Yo of each approved project with state funds, available local funds can be freed up to extencl library hours, buy more books, expand reading programs, increase library visits to local schools, or offer more adult learning opportunities_ The proposed bond act. • Authorizes grants to any city, county, city -county, or district that is empowered to own or maintain a local public library. • Gives first priority to joint use projects in which the agency operating the library and one or more school districts have a cooperative agreement. Second priority is given to all other projects. • Requires a 35 percent local rnmcla of the project cost, which creates a state and local partnership in funding each of the approved projects. Chants could he used for site acquisition, new building construction, renovating existing public library facilities or other facilities for their conversion to public libraries and purchase of necessary furniture and equipment- The minimum grant application is $50,000 and the maximum is S20,000,000. Grants will not be We to be used for adminiStraLive costs, gooks or other materials, ongoing operating costs, preparing (cnrrthm ed d ti page 2l ) Contents Letter to the Editor 2 President's Message ....... 3 Joint Use ........................ 4-5 People ..................... 5 Conference Highlights 7-15 Calif. Ctr. for the Book ... 16 Executive Sr Assembly Highlights ...................... 17 t.egiNotes ....................... 19 Master Calendar ............. 24 .24�. �1 02-98-00 12:56 RECEIVED FROM:1 p.lg FEB-08-00 TUE 01:01 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 P. 11 California Library Association President Linda Crowe BALIS/PIS/SVLS 2-S Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402-4000 President F.lect Cindy Me diavilla 49121mlayAvenue Cuiver City, CA 90230 Immediate Past President ,Anne Campbell National City Public Library 200 E 12th Strect National City, CA 91950-3314 '1rCaS11rCr Susan Kildretl) San Francisco Public Library 100Larkin Sthlair1 Cs al'ylc)or San Francisco, CA 94102 ALA. Councilor Sandra Reubcn County of Los Angeles Publ i c Ubrary 7400 E, lmp(-rW Highway Downey, CA 90252 Executive Director Susan Ncgreerl California 1.ibraryAss0ciatiorl 7171C Street, Su 1 to 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 vxisrcc�i� la-netof� EditorCalifornia Libraries EleanorMitchell UCLA Box9514S0 Los Angeles, CA 90095.1450 (310) 206-3S93 Fax: (310) 206-9312 Ptrlli`cheXrr*hraryaec Lc4ii Research 6r Publications Cornmittec Chair Mary lang univ. ofthe pacific Uhrary 3601 Pacific Ave Stockton, CA 95211 Production Staff Chd stie Braziei cbruzicl c-On-net. org CutifonnoUvwki (109lr7S28)isput1bhrd mnnrhly o cept b1monrhly.li ly/At,g ,and Nov/Dec for A $tIhscrlptt[rn of S 1().00 Per yNar fnan tn�rnlrers d[ae�lry the C:ahCuntie Llbiary Assuciatinaa, 717 K bcl ccr, 5[IiIC 300, Sacrarnentu, CA 9$81.1.3477- Pohodical: pusuge paid al Sdcr:Imento, Caltrornla, Pply-MM rFR:.Srnd nddrugs than geo to Cotilumin r ibrarhn ,717KSLtui, Su i i c's00, S � rr,[men to. r,A y581 a-3a 7:. Ucadiine: 10th Of the prcee11inp• month. Phan adJn-,� articlr•. [ur the'ruwYlvtler lu d ac CLA Ot[ lcc. l'tlrl[18I aubmheieLlS: L' n idil »turcltnr0rds dr MS word roe a on 3 I /T d it l maid hard copy; photoswel corned film] ire it brrenrrmH) .10MM Isin Latilnmiruibrtri(r ore not rufiyrighR'[7 nnlc;cpthCrwi:C nuq'[1, and vlay be rcpflfkt%A will) pcn1Li1UOn of CLAandavlhnr, Colt to ct the CIA off lie for Lrforni a tiiru on adv ltilingmlm. Letter to Editor Dear Editor: Proposition 14 offers a great opportunity to Public Iibraries to plan for the future. There has been much discussion about "joint use" libraries. 1 would encourage illy colleagues to think in broad terms about this definition. Our definition Of joint use is different in different communities to accurately reflect the interests of our citizens. This may mean a technology plan with school districts, homework centers, land leases for county library operation or even a true joint use library. Contrary to popular belief, the San Diego County Library is not urban, but a suburban -rural system, stretching from the An73-60Trego desert to the Mexican border, to the Pacific Ocean and north to the Riverside/Orange County lines. Two communities-- Descanso and 11otrero—have what could be termed "joint use" libraries, Funded by either Titic I1 or Commu- nity Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, these libraries are located on land leased from the Mountain -Empire School District, Operated by the San Diego County Library, these branches are "county libraries" in every sense of the word, yet they also provide a level of library service to the rural elemen- tary schools on whose campuses they reside. Do they follow a traditional pattern? "No." Does it work? "YY.St." As a library dirNCtnr with 23+ years of experience, my instinct and intellect told me to avoid mixing uses; yet it works —despite the obvious concerns. A second example is the "soon -to - begin -construction" of a true joint use library in the small (I3,000-popula- tion) community of Solana Beach. The present county library is located in a cramped storefront of about 3,800 square feet, with the distinction of having One of the most active children's programs in the county library system. The community has long wanted a new library but it was beyond our county library budget. Last year, Ilse San Dieguitio Union High . School District applied for Proposition 203 funds, offering; a challenge to the county, city and cOmmtrility to raise the remaining funds needed to build a r1CW Cn111ML111ity-school library. Much discussion and research resulted. A trip to Scottsdale, Aiu.ona, was made by all members of the Solana Beach (ity Council, all members of the school board, the chief -of -staff to this district's county supervisor, and myself, to visit that city's joint -use libraries so that everyone could see for themselves how such a library would operate. The pros and cons were laid out on the table at that visit, and all agreed that the Scottsdale model was working well. The Proposition 203 funds were awarded and the school district offered an additional $540,000 towards Construction. Tile city council then stepped to the plate with another $820,000, The board of supervisors offered SI00,000. Within a two - month period, notwithstanding; the Ob- stacles, COr111)ronlise and C01ltrOVCrsy, the con1111unity raised the $800,000 needed to provide the remaining funds to complete the 10,770 square -foot project. Library administration was presented with the challenge of crafting an opera- tional agreement with the school district that would work for both parties. After several meetings we haninlered oilt an agreement. 1`he rcault: the county library will operatL the building with county -paid staff. In this agreement thL biggest con- cerns resulted in 110TH parties holding the line; on less important issues both parties compromised. As a lifelong librarian (and somewhat of a skeptic), I was doubtful. But an enthusiastic community and a willing school district and city have convinced llle that this is what they want and that it WILL work in Solana Bei7ch because the COMM - nity Wants it. As we edge towards March 7, 2000, and the opportunity to see an adcitional $350 million in state bon(l funds available to construct new public libraries, I urge illy colleagues to think broadly about the definition of "joint use". As the county librarian for a 4,000 square -mile system with 31 branches and the need to upgrade and improve nearly of tlicin, 1 intend to approach this possible funding with a broad brush- I expect that the San Djtcgu County Library will hL a fierce advocate for funding, from Proposition 14_ Some of our applica- tions may be considered joint use if the community so desires, and SoniL will reflect the traditional lihr[an' lllodcl. lt9trrilt'rr Crntrclr Sign Di(Y? ('atrrrty 1AP),0rialr Califooda Libraries 9 Jrlflunry2000 .249 015 r 92-08-00 12:56 RECEIVED FROM:1 P.11 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:02 PM RIV 00 EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO, 1 Joint Use P. 12 What is Joint Use? Proposition 14 has brought renewed hope for rebuilding public libraries in the state. However, even positive legislation can raised issues and concerns. The one that is currently causing some angst among the profession surrounds the issue of joint use. In considering applications for Prop 14 revenues, the bond bill states, "first priority shall be given to joint use projects in which the agency that operates the library and one or more school districts have a cooperative agreement." What does this mean? We don't know at this point. The language in the legislation is intentionally vague and was intended to be that way by the Governor who wanted this requirement in the bill, According to his staff, he envisioned it to have a broadly defined scope. His goal is to improve student reading scores as well as their overall educational experience and he sees public libraries as a partner in that prU Ce 55. 7 he California Public Library Construc- tion and Renovation Board will define the ternis "Joint use projects" and "cooperative agreements" during the regulation -setting period that will follow the passage of Prop 14. The Board will consist of the State Librarian, the Stale'l'reasurer, State Finance Director, an appointee of the Governor, an Assembly member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly, and a Senator appointed by the Senate Rules Committee. It is up to us to participate in that process. We are the experts who can provide substantive, compel- ling and persuasive ideas for those defini- tions- We need to be thoughtful as well as creative. In being creative, we should look at programs we currently provide that could be included in those definitions. Here are a few ideas of what joint use might entail and we encourage you to think of others and send them to this newsletter: • 1'he traditional concept of a joint use school public library facility that is located on, or adjacent to, a school site (Chula Vista). • An agreement between the schools and the public library for automation services (1\'atiol)al City), • An agreement in which a school district issues the blinds for a new public library facility vvith the understanding the library will electronically link to school sites and provide materials in the collection that help serve the educational needs of the students and staff while serving the California Libraries • January 2000 02-08-00 12:57 RECEIVED FROM:1 needs of the community as a Whole (I .ivermore). An agreement between the school district and the public library in which the public library operates the districts' libraries as school libraries (EI Segundo. See related story below). A contract between a school district/ library district and a county for the county library to operate tine district library (Solano County), An agreement to provide class visits and library instructions to students. It is up to us to participate in the regulation -setting hearings and persuade the Board members that successful joint use cooperative agreements between public schools and public libraries can take many forms. That participation will snake it easier for thent to establish regulations with the broadest possible interpretation of these ternis. ]11t7 gal C,t "Todd Whittaker Ptihlic Library Ann Cott.sittedtt Solano Courtly Library El Segundo: A "Joint Use" Success Story On I)ecernbcr 3, )991, the El Segundo Unified School l.)istrict and the City of El Segundo entered into a library System Affiliation Agreement that placed the school district's three school libraries, as branch sites, under the administration of the El Segundo Public Library. initially, there was no budget for honks, neither library catalog was online, and the school library collections were sadly worn and outdated. After the affiliation agreement was in place, community and business donations and funds from bosh agencies began pouring in, supporting both the collections and the implementation of online systems. Innopac tisas iristallcd, and the public library began ordering and processing materials for the main library and all three branches. The affiliation was not without c]]a1- len9c-s. One practical and inirnediate concern was how io grapple with tw() different purchasing systems_ Even moue (Cortfitrtrtd or ? past, j) 016 2 4.4 P.12 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:03 PM RIV 00 EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. 1 P. 13 A "Joint Use" Success Story (continued horn page 4) critical was the need to address the concerns of teachers and the PTA when the public library staff started weeding and discarding large numbers of books from antiquated school library collections- However, within a couple of years, teachers and parents began seeing the school libraries' collections grow with new books and encyclopedias; comput- ers sparked the interest of the children_ As the school libraries became DIOTe attractive to teachers and students for class visits, the corrullitinent on both sides for this joint venture to work became Stranger_ After eight years, the annual funding level is approximately $200,000, including funds provided by tiie city of E1 Segundo and the school district. Nine part-time library Clerks and one Lull-tin'7e library assistant cataloger are the paid City staff operating the branches. The school district pays for a district librarian and a circulation cicilo improvements continue to find support: the middle school library was completely remod- eled last year and another new elementary school and library will be constructed this year_ Other funding sources play an impor- tant role in the success of the venture. Over 565,000 was recently raised by the Friends of the ),,I Segundo Public Library and the School District's PTA for the core collection of the new elementary school library. In addition, a grant from the Californla Department of Education for $77,000 was awarded to the school libraries last year to upgrade computer leChnology &rid update rCfCrellce materials for the libraries. The joint ventltre works well in El Segtando, 'Ihe public/school library system is small enough to be managed well. The community cares enough about the quality of educatiotl for its children to maintain ad- equate funding to keep Ihe library collection rnoclern and The libraries fully operational. There is an approved five-year school library plan by the school hoard for additional staffing and improved services_ School libraries are alive and doing very well in FI SegLindo thanks to this partnership between the City and the school district. Debris 131-iYltlon El suslaido'Act i?(q Direl for Joint Use Riverside County library System - joint Use Projects The Riverside County Library System (RCLS) provides library service, through 24 library facilities and 2 bookmobiles, to approximately 800,000 residents spread across a 7,000 square mile area. There are 18 school districts and three community college districts within the RCI.S service area. In order to increase the level of service provided to both county residents and students, RCLS has entered into a number of joint use agreements with schools. For RCLS these joint use projects between educational institutions and public libraries have proven to be an efficient and flexible way to increase library service with a minimal increase in costs. For example, in September 1999, a 6,000 square foot shared -use library opened in Hamilton High School in Anza, a rural commllnjty of around 5,000 people. This facility, a joint venture with Hemet Unified School District, serves as both the high school and Public library. school personnel operate the library during school hours, while county staff operate the library after school and on weekends. All library users have access to the separated school and public library coilcclions every hour the library is open, dramatically increasing service hours and collection size at no additional cost to either the county or the school. Policy issues are dealt with by having school policies apply during the school day and county policies prevail at all other times. In the spring of 2000, the San Jacinto Public library (a RCLS facility) will begin to share a new 11,000 square foot library with San Jacinto High School, Urider the operat- ing arrangement, this facility will have an integrated collection, as well as a united cataloging and circulation systern_ Staffing, for both the school and public library, will be provided by the public library. As in Anza, the library and all of the collection will be open to any library user_ This allows RCLS to triple the service hours for San Jacinto residents and the school to increase access for students, for virtually the same amount of money retluired to operate two separate facilities, Both RC:I.S high school joint use library facilities are located at the perimeter of the their campuses, easing both the schools' concern for security and the Public's unease about entering the school campus. (colitirttlejail page 21) 017 California Libraries • Jarlirary 2000 02-08-00 12:58 RECEIVED FROM:1 245 P.13 FEB-08-00 TUE 01:03 PM RIV CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE FAX NO. 1 P. 14 March Ballot Initiative (continued from page 1) the grarit application, procuring matching funds or charges for financing the project. Joint use guidelines will be developed with input from the library community. Proposition 1.1 has widespread support. It was placed on the ballot with ovenwhelm- ing support from both Republican and Democratic state legislators as well as the Governor. In addition to CLA, the League of Wornen Voters of California, Congress of California Seniors and the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs are so enthusiastic about Proposition 14 that they signed ballot arguments- The California Teachcrs Associatlon and Lt. Governor Cruz 13ustaniante have also weighed in with their endorsements, finally, a recently conducted poll by Godbe Research and Analysis showed that after voters heard the measure's key provisions, Proposition 14 received strong support from voters statewide - A campaign committee has been formed to organize support for Proposition 14. Californians for Literacy and Communities Libraries is working to educate voters on the benefits of this bond act. The campaign steering committee is chaired by James Dawe, a San Diego attorney and a long- time library advocate who is the current president of the Library of California Board. The campaign eommitrce will working to in- crease and diversify support for Proposition 14 over the coming months. CLA members interested in learning more about Proposi- tion 14 or about the campaign, may contact the campaign committee at 916-737-9331. Ann (;ousineau Legislative Committee Chair Riverside County Library System - Joint Use Projects (continued from page S) Tk�o RCI.S locations (Mecca and Hibhgrove) have public libraries located on elementary school campuses. Key advan- tages to this type of facility are: 1) increased use of the public library for classroom visits and other school related activities, and 2) greater contrrittnity awaMless of and involve- ment in public library programs. The location of the facilities is such that the increased use of the public library does not hinder the security of the elementary school campus. Computer use agreements are in place between RCI.S and two school districts. At Desert Sands Unified School District in the Coachella valley, the district provides 15 personal computers for after -school use at the R(-LS libraries in Palm Desert, Indio, and I.a Quinra. Although intended for student use, the general public is welcome to use the computers when students are not. Mean- while, In Jurupa Unified School District, which serves the unincorporated county area near the city of Riverside, the district pro- vides student trainers at the Robidoux Library to assist public library users Willi basic internet and personal computer instructions. Under these two partnerships. both public library users and students benefit. Again, by working with the school districts, both the county and school district are able to significantly enhance educational and library services with a minimal Increase in cost. The College of the Desert and the Palm Desert Public Library (a RCLS facility) share a large 40,000 square foot facility. The collec- tions are housed in different parts of the library', but there is a common circulation system and union catalog (which has both Dewey and LC classification systems.) Each library also provides for its own reference and associated public service staffs; however, the county staff operates the circulation sys- tem for both, Getz- Cirri.stmas Rhperside Comity Library SY.stem 21 Oil? California Libraries • Iiamary 2000 02-08-00 12:58 RECEIVED FROM:1 246 P.14 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: /40 ORDINANCE NO. 338 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9.100.1400) AND (5) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2000-064 CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 1 ST day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding an amendment to the Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 25th day of January, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding an amendment to the Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations: and, WHEREAS, said request has complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (as amended), and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the project could not have any significant adverse effect on the physical environment; therefore, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3); and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify the recommendation for approval of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment: 1. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not adversely affect the development of the areas as specified by the General Plan for the City. 2. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will further the intent of the goals and policies of the General Plan. 3. There will be no significant impacts from this Zoning Ordinance Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: 248 "ze Ordinance No. 338 Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations Adopted: February 15, 2000 Page 2 SECTION 1. Section 9.100.140 (1) and (5) of the La Quinta Municipal Code is hereby amended for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance and as setforth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. Said Zoning Ordinance Amendment request has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council this 151h day of February, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 249 Ordinance No. 338 Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations Adopted: February 15, 2000 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 250 Ordinance No. 338 Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations Adopted: February 15, 2000 Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" 9.100.140 Temporary Outdoor Events. Temporary outdoor events include, but are not limited to pageants, fairs, carnivals, large athletic, religious or entertainment events, and large neighborhood or community gatherings in temporary facilities. Such activities may be permitted in compliance with the following provisions: 1. A temporary use permit shall be approved by the Community Development Director for gatherings of 50 or more. The temporary use permit may be referred to the Planning Commission as a Business Item at the discretion of the Director. 2. Applications for permits or certificates required by this Section shall be referred by the Community Development Director to other affected City departments or other public agencies for review and comment. 3. The following findings shall be made by the decision -making authority in conjunction with approval of a temporary use permit: a. The event will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community in the area of the proposed event. b. There is adequate area to conduct the event and to accommodate the anticipated attendance. C. Sufficient parking will be provided for the anticipated attendance. d. Food service operations, medical facilities, solid waste facilities, sewage disposal methods and potable water service have been provided. (Approval by the health officer may be required.) e. Fire protection plans and facilities have been provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal f. Security plans and facilities have been provided to the satisfaction of the Sheriff. g. Public roadways providing access to the event are capable of accommodating the anticipated traffic volumes in a reasonable and safe 251 Ordinance No. 338 Temporary Outdoor Event Regulations Adopted: February 15, 2000 Page 5 manner with minimal disruption to local traffic circulation. 4. Activities conducted on property owned by or leased to the city and public road rights -of -way may require an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Director. 5. The event shall not exceed ten consecutive days. Events recurring more than four times in a calendar year are not considered temporary and shall not be eligible for approval under this Section. Provided however, fine art and craft shows may be approved for ten calendar days in each month, except during City sponsored fine art events. 6. A cash bond or other guarantee for removal of the temporary use and cleanup and restoration of the activity site to its condition before the event within seven days of the event's conclusion shall be required. 7. Other applicable permits such as building, electrical, health and tent permits, shall be obtained by the applicant. 9. Signs for the event shall be allowed as follows: a. Maximum of one temporary banner per street frontage, not to exceed 32 square feet. b. Maximum one temporary portable sign on- or off -site on private property, not to exceed 55 square feet. C. Maximum 30 off -site temporary directional signs, 9 square feet in area, subject to the provisions of Section 9.160.060, Paragraphs C through H with the exception of Paragraph E. d. Maximum 15 bunting signs, with maximum size to be approved by the Director of Community Development. e. Posting period, locations, and related details shall be as approved in the temporary use permit for the event. f. Other signs and advertising devices, such as pennants, flags, A -frame signs, are prohibited. 252 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 339 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.65.090(B) OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Chapter 2.65, Section 2.65.090(B) of the La Quinta Charter and Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.65.090 Development Fee. B. All residential structures whose Project Costs is in excess of $200,000 will be charged a Fee hereunder equal to the greater of: 1 . 1 /4 of 1 % for that portion of Project Cost in excess of $200,000; or 2. Twenty Dollars ($20.00). SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall within fifteen (15) days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council this 15th day of February, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Z53 Ordinance No. 339 Art in Public Places Adopted: February 15, 2000 Page 2 JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 2454 Tjht 4 4 Qum & COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Discussion of Fairway • Advertising's Proposed Amendment to the City's Billboard Regulations RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: This matter was originally before the City Council on October 5, 1999 and continued at the request of Fairway Advertising to January 18, 2000, and now to this meeting. The Council Minutes and staff report for January 18th are included as Attachment 1. The matter is before you for discussion. Respectfully sytbmitted, rry Herrhan immunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 253 1. January 18, 2000 City Council Minutes and staff report C:\Mv Documents\WPDOCS\CCJH-Billboards.doc 4 ATTACHMENT 1 F-j City Council Minutes 0 After a brief discussion, Council concurred to the La Quinta Senior Center to select one Council. / January 18, 2000 this matter to the Friends of ent for recommendation to MOTION - It was moved bZnior embers Sniff/Henderson to refer the matter of the "Living For Yonior Inspiration Award Program to the Friends of the La Quintsenter to select one recipient for recommendation to Council.ed unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2000-12. Council concurred to consider Study Session Item No. 1 at this time. 1. DISCUSSION OF FAIRWAY ADVERTISING'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S BILLBOARD REGULATIONS. There were no changes to the staff report as submitted and on file in the City Clerk's Office. Mayor Pena stated Fairway Advertising has requested this item be continued but public comment will be taken. Christine Clarke, 2205 N. Poinsettia Avenue, Manhattan Beach, of Stamko Development Company, commented on the sensitivity of this issue and asked Council to consider selecting a few Council Members and staff to meet with the property owners of the land where the signs are located before discussing it in a study session. Bill Gage, 16897 Algonguin, Suite A, Huntington Beach, of Dunlap Company, agreed with Ms. Clarke and referenced problems they are having getting Fairway Advertising to remove a sign on their property. He asked to be included in any discussions on this matter. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, commented on the visual 'blight of advertising signs and suggested the City support the pending State legislation which will give cities the right to remove such signs without financial burden. Ed Scherer, 68-300 Perez Road, Cathedral City, General Manager of Fairway Advertising, stated he is looking forward to working with the City and developers on this issue. CZ11? City Council Minutes 10 January 18, 2000 Mayor Pena reiterated this item will be continued to February 15. Council concurred to consider Business Session Item No. 8 at this time. BUSINESS SESSION ...\ ..... continued 8. CONTINUED CONSI ERATION OF KSL's REQUEST THAT THE CITY OF LA QUINTA MODIF ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED NATIONAL MONUMENT DESIGNATJON. Community Development irector Herman advised draft legislation is expected to be posted on Congres woman Bono's website in early February and considered by the Legislativ Committee in Washington D.C. in late February. He then reviewed the revised undary map, noting the boundary line begins at the 200-foot elevation level in a mountain side. In response to Council Member Sn f, Mr. Herman stated it's his understanding that almost everyone involved is in greement with the revised map. After a brief discussion, Council con urred to continue its "wait and hold" stance until the draft legislation procesk is completed. MOTION - It was moved by Council Me bers Sniff/Adolph to continue any action on the matter of the proposed Natio I Monument designation legislation to March 7, 2000. Motion carried una imously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 2000-13. 6. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY PARK NORTH MASTER PLAN. Community Services Director Horvitz presented a b 'ef history on the project as outlined in the staff report. Mayor Pena stated he and the City Manager recently et with Assemblyman Battin and members of the AYSO Board regarding the nee for dedicated soccer fields. He suggested referring this back to staff to r ise the park as a dedicated soccer field with other small components and using the Sports Complex as a dedicated baseball field. City Manager Genovese noted if substantial changes are made the master plan should go back through the conceptual plan process because the use and intent of the park is important in the design element. �a7 T4ht 4:&Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: January 18, 2000 Discussion of Fairway Advertising's Proposed Amendment to the City's Billboard Regulations RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: FILE COPY AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: This matter was before the City Council on October 5, 1999 (Attachment 1), at which time staff was given direction to work with Morris Communications to find out what they could do to make billboard signs more attractive and less of a visual blight. Staff was further directed to research the requirements to modify the current ordinance regulating billboard signs, as well as any associated legal issues. On December 13th, a letter was received from Mr. Edward M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, a division of Morris Communications, identifying seven suggestions relating to outdoor advertising structures (Attachment 2). The suggestions included in the letter are as follows: 1. The number of outdoor advertising structures within the City of La Quinta as of January 1, 1999 be inventoried (Sign Inventory) and capped such that no greater number of such structures may ever exist within the City. 2. The structures within the Sign Inventory may be modified and maintained in such a manner so as to improve their general aesthetics, structural soundness and overall appearance consistent with Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the Council. 253 005 CCJH.00a 4 3. Structures within the Sign inventory which are required to be removed for whatever reason may be relocated within the nonresidential overlay of the regional commercial and community commercial zones only. 4. All structures shall be spaced at a minimum of 500 feet from any other structure on the same side of the street, consistent with California Law. 5. The overall height shall not exceed 35 feet above road grade or base of sign whichever is greater. 6. Setbacks for the structures would be as follows: a. Front = 20 feet from street right of way b. Side = 10 feet from property line\ 7. The overall dimension in gross square footage of the sign shall not exceed 378 feet, excluding extended advertising, with the copy. The extended advertising copy ("cut-outs") shall not exceed 25 percent of gross square footage. At the Council meeting of October 5th, staff identified that off -premise, billboard, outdoor advertising signs are prohibited within the City. They are allowed to be maintained in their current state; however, if removed, they cannot be relocated. This policy has been in effect since May 1, 1984. Some billboards have been relocated due to street widening or actions due to settlement agreements between individual property owners along Highway 1 1 1, the City, and sign companies. The City, in 1998, adopted the Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines establishing standards for the 50 foot setback along Highway 111. In essence, the Guidelines set out the requirements for the landscaping palette and sidewalk configuration along the entire length of Highway 111 in La Quinta. Within this setback, buildings are not permitted to intrude; however, parking spaces have been permitted to encroach within the setback. In the Fall of 1999, staff completed a photo inventory of the billboard signs along Highway 111 (Attachment 3). There currently exists 11 billboards along Highway 111. As can be seen in the photos, most of the structures are located within the 50 foot landscape setback or the right of way needed for Highway 1 1 1 widening. Ten of the billboards range in size from approximately 214 to 338 square feet and one billboard is 537 square feet in size. The proposed revisions would permit a maximum sign of 15.13 by 25 feet which equates to 378 square feet in size. The proposed revisions would allow ten of the existing 11 signs to be enlarged. Currently, the City of La Quinta does not require the removal of billboards when development occurs along Highway 111. Any sign removal is between the property owner and the sign company. Under current regulations, if the property owner has the sign removed, the sign could not be relocated within the City. CCJH.00a 259 a"O 6 The State Legislature will be considering a proposed bill to allow a City to have billboards removed without compensation if the City's amortization process complies with State Law (Attachment 4). The City has sent a letter in support (Attachment 5) of this legislation. The modification of the current regulations would undo years of billboard prohibition within the City and has the potential of affecting the landscape aesthetic the City is now trying to achieve along Highway 1 1 1. The matter is before you for discussion. Respectfully submitted; L — H�V-4j,'— l rry Her an mmuni Development Director Approved for submission by; Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. October 5, 1999 City Council staff report and minutes. 2. Letter from Mr. Edward M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, a division of Morris Communications, dated December 13, 1999. 3. Sign inventory photos 4. Assembly Bill 483 5. City letter of support for AB 483 CCJH.00a 2 G 0 00 Titf 4 4 Q" COUNCIURDA MEETING DATE: October 5, 1999 Discussion of Regulations Regarding Billboards As deemed appropriate by the City Council. J, ei ► None. None. January 18, 2000 ATTACHMENT 1 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: During the September 7, 1999 City Council meeting, Mayor Pena advised that Morris Communications (Fairway Outdoor Advertising) (Attachment 1) has requested that the City Council schedule a study session to discuss the City's outdoor advertising criteria. Staff has researched the history of the City's regulations regarding outdoor advertising, billboards and off premise Signs. The following is a summary of the actions leading up to our current regulations: 1. On May 1, 1984, the City Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance for a 45-day period (May 1, 1984 to June 15, 1984) restricting the erection or construction of any outdoor advertising display or outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign within the City of La Quinta (Ordinance No. 53). 2. On June 5, 1984, the City Council continued the Urgency Ordinance prohibiting outdoor advertising displays, structures, and signs from June 16, 1984 to May 1, 1985 (Ordinance 56). 3. On May 7, 1985, the City Council extended the Urgency Ordinance from May 8, 1985 to May 7, 1986. CCM.Wa 008 4. _ On September 1, 1987, the City Council adopted a new comprehensive set of sign regulations which prohibited off premise signs. An off premise sign was defined as follows: "A structure which bears a sign which is not appurtenant to the use of the property where the sign is located, or a product sold, or a service offered upon the property where the sign is located, and which does not identify the place of business where the sign is located as a purveyor of the merchandise or services advertised upon the sign. Some temporary signs are not defined as off premise signs as used within this chapter." 5. On April 2, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 281 which created new sign regulations. These regulations continue to prohibit off premise, billboards, or outdoor advertising signs. Throughout all of these regulations, the City chose to permit existing off premise, outdoor advertising, billboards to remain provided they were not structurally altered or abandoned for more than one year. The current regulations dealing with off premise signs, billboards and outdoor advertising were sent to Mr. M. Scherer, III, General Manager for Fairway Outdoor Advertising, on September 23, 1999, as well as notifying him that this issue would be on the October 5Ih City Council agenda for discussion. The matter is before you for discussion. submitted, Airy H#iman Cqtnmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: homas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: _ 1. Letter from Mr. Peter Scheurmier, Morris Communications Corporation dated September 7, 1999 r - 262 009 CCJH.00a 3 -99 TUE 05:31 PM FLORIDA TIMES UNION MORRIS September 7, 1999 CO111JJIYJC TlUNS c•....0•rs*- Via Facsimile PETER SUMMER The Honorable John Pena Vice President h1ayor, City of La Quinta 7$495 Calle Tampico OUTDOOR La Quinta, California 92253 BRt).1DC.+1�1'J tC Re: La Quinta Sign Ordinance DIRECT NURKET) NC Dear Mayor Pena: FAX NO. 904 359 440 October 5, 2000 _ ATTACHMENT 1 Following our various meetings and conversations, the purpose of this letter is to request a study session with the La Quinta City Council to disciiss the City's current sign ordinance as it relates to Fairway Outdoor Advertising's continued relationship %%ith your City. l:air%vay Outdoor Advertising is a division of Nforris Communications Avhich owns a number of mediaVinfortmational platforms in the Coachella Valley. In addition w Fairway, Morris owns the seven -station Desert Radio Croup, Best Read Guide, Sunline Buss Shelter Advertising, as well as soon to be launched internet and direct marketing platforms. 0'Q !JV 6j"IDI AVE. JACISONVILLC PLORID, _SN_ ' Fairway has been a part of the economic fabric of the Cin, of La Quinta for many years. Our signs both inside and outside your City routine]y advertise, promote and direct people to La Quinta businesses, including PGA West, The La Quinta Hotel and numerous single- TEL 904.359.4579 fatntily home subdivisions. FAX 904.359.4400 In addition, our various media platforms promote and support La Quints businesses and events, both commercial and noncommercial; to provide broad -based coverage to xhenrmr@tu.infi.net residents of the Coachella Valley as a whole, as well as the extremely valuable tourist rww.morrisewm.tom community. In short, we help residents and wunsts alike fluid La Quinta golf courses, hotels, restaurants and events, as well as provide vital information to valley residents and newcomers in finding and purchasing new Homes. Modern technology, design improvements and creative landscaping allow Fairway to minimize visual impacts associated xrith outdoor advertising while still preserving the economic benerits associated with driving more people to the City of La Quints. 263 010 TUE 05:32 PM FLORIDA TIMES UNION The Honorable John Pena September 7, 1999 Page Two FAX N0, 904 359 4400 P. 03 The Morris mandate to its local operating units is to work with and support the local communities in which, and with which, we do business. it is in this spirit of cooperation that we respectfully request the opportunity to make a presentation before the La Quinta City Council at its meeting on September 21, 1999 to discuss how Fairway and the City can continuo the mutually beneficial relationship. Your consideration of this matter is greatly appreciated. rvz�:1t1 cc: William S. Morris, TH Will S. Morris,lV Edward A Scherer, Al James Cato Ferguson, Esquire 264 011 City Council Minutes 12 October 5, 1999 MOT ove y o fund and present a suitable plaque to Fred Simon/Simon Motors to honor the alership's 25th anniversary in La Quinta in an amount not to exceed $3 0 from the Special Projects Contingency Fund. Motion carried unanimo ly. MINUTE ORDER NO. 99-143. 7. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO 2.70.020 (BOARD MEETINGS) AND 2.70.030 LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD. Mr. Falconer, Finance Director, advised that the reviewed the proposed amendments, and haSA CF,:"PT 2.70, SECTIONS IOAR FUNCTIONS), OF THE CO RELATIVE TO THE ivestment Advisory Board has r.ommended adoption. MOTION - It was moved by Council Membpfs Sniff/Adolph to take up Ordinance No. 336 by title and number only and aive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 336 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING S CTIONS 2.70.020 (BOARD MEETINGS) AND 2.70.030 (BOARD FUNCTIONS) OF THE LA QUINTA CHARTER AND MUNICIPAL CODE RELAT G TO THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD. It was moved by Coun d Members Sniff/Adolph to introduce Ordinance No. 336 on first reading. M ion carried by the following vote: AYES: Co cil Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: ne ABSENT: one ABSTAIN: None Council doncurred on taking up Study Session Item No. 2 at this time. 2. DISCUSSION .OF REGULATIONS REGARDING BILLBOARDS. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that in May 1984 the City adopted a 45-day urgency ordinance that restricted outdoor signage, and 265 012 City Council Minutes 13 October 5, 1999 continued it until May 1986. On September 1, 1987, the City adopted new permanent sign regulations which prohibited off -premise signs. The ordinance allowed existing signs to remain, but prohibited them from being modified or structurally altered. The current regulations were adopted on April 2, 1996, and continued the same prohibition and limitations on maintenance and relocation of existing signs. Mayor Pena noted that Morris Communications (Fbe, way Outdoor Advertising) has asked to make a presentation. Peter Scheurmier, One Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida, Vice President of Advertising for Morris Communications, reviewed the company's background and local business efforts through Fairway and Desert Outdoor Advertising, Sunrise Marketing (bus shelter advertising), and Desert Radio Group. He also introduced several members of their company, and advised that they have seven or eight billboards in La Quinta, along with several advertising signs in bus shelters. PGA West and Rancho La Quinta are their largest commercial clients in the valley. They also support many community events in La Quinta, and are currently erecting two billboards (outside. of the City) that advertise the La Quinta Arts Foundation. He then played a CD advertising the Le Quinta Arts Foundation. He advised that they wish to be a. part of the City's growth, and believe that they provide a commercial benefit to the City. They're Pot asking to construct additional billboards, but rather wish to improve the existing signs, and to use modern technology and landscaping to help mitigate the impact of billboards. He asked that they be allowed to work with staff to find a way to update, remodel, and relocate their current signs. They wish to develop a plan for an acceptable balance of benefits and burdens associated with outdoor advertising that properly serve the City's interest, support the business community, and to possibly propose changes to the current sign regulations to accommodate preserving a good business balance. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that they are not asking for additional billboards, but rather to be allowed to relocate and/or remodel the existing ones, and to some degree, replace them. The existing billboards are not falling down, but they can make them look more attractive and modernistic. He confirmed that it would be appropriate to add "replace" to their list of proposed changes. Mayor Pena asked if they could provide some "before and after" photographs should they be allowed to update the signs. Mr. Scheurmier advised that they could, and stated that they wish to work with staff to find some acceptable things to present to Council. 266 013 City Council Minutes 14 October 5, 1999 In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that the current regulations allow maintenance of the signs, but not structural alterations. That would require an update of the sign regulations. Mr. Scheurmier understood that State law allows the City to ignore its own ordinances if it's in the best interest of the City, specifically as it relates to billboards. They would like to have the ordinance brought forward for possible amendment, and to present their "before and after" photographs at the same time. Council Member Adolph advised that he doesn't support billboards or other major signs on buildings because he feels that they destroy the image that the City is trying to establish. He asked if they would be receptive to relocating their signs to areas where they would not be creating problems aesthetically. Mr. Scheurmier didn't see a problem with it as long as they can stay reasonably within the realm of their overall marketing area. Mayor Pena felt the other sign companies might take advantage of an updated ordinance and improve their billboards as well. He wished to have Morris Communications come back to staff with some preliminary design standards for Council to consider. Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that they would not come back with a request for additional billboards. In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the existing billboards are legal non -conforming uses, and that as development occurs, it's up to the property owners to determine whether or not they wish to include the existing billboards in their development design. Council Member Henderson noted that most of the billboards along Highway 111 fall within the 50-foot setback area, and asked if the sign company would have to negotiate with the City or the developer. Ms. Honeywell advised that it's up to the developer whether or not they wish to include the billboard in their sign program, which has to be approved by the City. She advised that the purpose of the ordinance was to eventually eliminate billboards, and it was written as legally tight as possible to encourage the signs to disappear over time, and not to allow them to be updated. Council Member Henderson felt that while the City is waiting for development to occur, the sign companies would probably continue maintaining the existing 267 014 r City Council Minutes 15 October 5, 1999 structures, and the City will have to continue living with aging, unattractive signs. Council Member Sniff felt that the request to update, relocate, remodel, and/or replace the existing billboards is reasonable, .and that it would provide more attractive and modern structures. He suggested looking into the possibility of modifying the ordinance and asking Morris Communications to present the Council with some computer -generated "before and after" photographs. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Scheurmier advised that all but four of the billboards in the City are theirs. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Herman advised that there are 10-12 billboards total. Wells Marvin, 79-258 Cetrino Street, felt the billboards are a blight to the City, and believed they will eventually fall down if they're not allowed to be moved. He urged the Council to work toward getting all of the billboards removed, to tighten up the current ordinance, and to improve code enforcement of the current sign regulations. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, agreed, and felt that the size of the signs should be restricted to no larger than what currently exists. Ed Scherer, 68-300 Perez Road, Cathedral City, of Fairway Outdoor Advertising, advised that their signs are 240 sq. ft. (10Y2' X 22%'). In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Scheurmier confirmed that currently they can maintain the signs forever just as they are by replacing one post or piece of wood at a time. Council Member Perkins wished to see what type of changes they propose for their signs before he will consider changing the ordinance. He felt with proper landscaping and design, it might be possible for them to come up with something that is more attractive. Mr. Scheurmier advised that their plan is to work with staff to create a series of standards that staff feels would be acceptable to present to Council as a logical step forward. Council concurred on directing staff to work with Morris Communications to find out what they can do to make the signs more attractive and less of a visual 2 ru8 01 City Council Minutes 16 October 5, 1999 blight, and to look at what would be required in a modified ordinance, as well as the legalities involved. DISCUSSION REGARDING NEW DEVELOPMENT PAD ELEVATIONS. Mr. Speer, Senior Engineer, advised that the three-foot pad elevation ifferential, which has been used since early 1990's, was first used as a mpromise solution at the Sonrisa development before the tract was acquired by the current developer. The three-foot pad elevation differential, when cou ed with the single -story requirement, benefits the builder by providing flexibi 'ty to create sufficient slope gradient for sewer and storm water drainage. It .bene 'ts the existing resident by imposing a height restriction that avoids a dominati presence by the new structure with respect to the existing structure. a Municipal Code allows a 22-foot high structure when an existing one-story d Iling is within 50 feet of a common property line, and the minimum back rd setback is 20 feet for new lots and 10 feet for existing lots. He then reviewe some sight -line slope comparisons for buildings of varying heights with diff ere t roof designs and backyard setbacks. - He then reviewed the cost comparisons r the alternatives, advising that increasing the backyard setback to 15 feet tend to be more cost-effective at approximately $2,400/lot, whereas the costs for re cing the pad elevations by exporting the,soil offsite is approximately $9,050/ t, and relocating the soil elsewhere onsite is approximately $2,70, "c ne of the problems related to reducing the pad elevations is sewer service. VWD requires gravity flow sewer systems whenever possible because sewe lift stations increase maintenance costs and increase risk of failure, which als increases exposure to claims and adverse publicity. Another relevant conside tion is the fact that as developable land gets farther away from the mountain p ks, the mountain ridge line is closer to the horizon and the sight -line slope in m y cases is less than 12%. Council Member Adolph noted that in some c es the three-foot pad elevation differential would allow seven to eight feet o fill on the adjacent property, which is against the natural flow of the ground. felt the natural slope should be followed within reason, and didn't wish to see what happened at Sonrisa happen again. He agreed that no one has the rig to a view, but felt the problem is when developers go overboard with fill to r 'se their property. In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Speer bOvised that in the Sonrisa development the pads adjacent to the tract boundary ere raised three feet, but nearly 90,000 yards of soil was exported offsite. The tract could have been designed differently, but the City didn't require it. 269 0.10: January 18, 2000 ATTACHMENT 2 I(FA 1 R WAY A Division of Morris Communications Corporation December 11, 1999 Mr. Jerry Herman Community Development Director City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Council Study Session Regarding Billboards Dear Mr. Herman: DKZ Via Facsimile: (760) 777-7101 and U.S. Mail This letter is written in follow up to the presentation made by Peter Scheurmier of Moms. Communications to the La Quinta City Council earlier this Fall. As you will recall, the Council was receptive to our proposal, in concept, to cap the existing number of billboards within the City, allow Morris to upgrade and improve its existing inventory, and allow for relocation of its structures if necessary to accommodate new development within the City. A copy of Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the council is enclosed for your review. result: At this point, we would like to formally propose the following suggestions to accomplish this 1. The number of outdoor advertising structures within the City of La Quinta as of January 1, 1999 be inventoried (Sign Inventory) and capped such that no greater number of such structures may ever exist within the City; 2. The structures within the Sign Inventory may be modified and maintained in a such a manner so as to improve their general aesthetics, structural soundness and overall appearance consistent with Mr. Scheurmier's presentation before the Council; 3. Structures within the Sign inventory which are required to be removed for whatever reason may be relocated within the nonresidential overlay of the regional commercial and community commercial zones only. 4. All structures shall spaced at a minimum of 500 feet from any other structure on the same side of the street, consistent with California law. 2,o FAIRWAY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING • PALM SPRINGS • 68.300 PEREZ ROAD • CATHEDRAL CITY - CALIFORNIA • 92234 O 7�.y TELEPHONE 760.324.1828 FACSIMILE 760.324.9270 5. The overall height shall not exceed 35 feet above road grade or base of sign whichever is greater. 6. Setbacks for the structures would be as follows: a. Front = 20 feet from street right of way b. Side =10 feet from property line 7. The overall dimension in gross square footage of the sign shall not exceed 378 square feet, excluding extended advertising, with the copy. The extended advertising copy ("cut-outs") shall not to exceed 25 percent of gross square footage. With these changes, we believe the objectives set forth in Mr Scheurmier's presentation to council can be accomplished thus striking a balanced approach in encouraging economic development while maintaining, and improving the City aesthetic standards. We welcome your comments. Sincerely, Edward M. Scherer, III General Manager cc: Peter Scheurmier EMS:slt 2�1 AM Presentation to La Quinta City Council Mr. Mayor, Honorable Council Members and Participants: My name is Peter Scheurmier. I am Vice President of Outdoor Advertising, Radio and Direct Marketing of Morris Communications Corporation, a family -owned, multimedia company based in Augusta, Georgia. As a family owned and managed company, we operate under clear mandates. Be an integral part of the communities we serve. 2. Do right by the communities and their businesses. 3. Run an honest and aggressive business operation. Specifically, here in La Quinta and the Desert, Morris does business as Fairway Outdoor, Desert Outdoor, Sunrise Bus Shelters, the seven station Desert Radio Group, SmarTTargeT Direct Marketing, and a soon to be launched internet operation. In the City of La Quinta we have seven or eight billboards, a dozen or so bus shelters, and wide distribution of Best Read Guide. Radio, of course, is everywhere. I'd like to take a moment to introduce you to the folks responsible for fulfilling the Morris mandate here in the desert — Ed Scherer, General Manager of Fairway and Desert Outdoor, as well as the Sunrise Bus Shelters. Bruce Johnson is responsible for the Desert Radio Group, Best Read Guide and SmarTTargeT Marketing. Pat Gleeson is Director of Sales for all Morris media operations. Tom Gardner is Sales Manager of the outdoor advertising company and, by the way, an accomplished fine artist in his own right -and one of the La Quinta Arts Festival judges. Lastly, but far from least, Lou Penrose, morning host of 1010 K-News and Morris' Director of Community Affairs. I'm not sure I invited him, I think he's here of his own accord as a newsperson to keep us all honest. We are currently consolidating all our media platforms into a single location and combining their operations for maximum reach of valley residents and visitors alike. Morris has been a part of the economic fabric of La Quinta for a quarter of a century and the years have brought significant economic value to the City of La Quinta. Over 25 "La Q'businesses use our media platforms to reach people and direct them to La Quinta. In fact, our outdoor advertising company's two largest clients are PGA West/La Quinta Resort and Rancho La Quinta. 019 In addition to the commercial side, we try to be good corporate citizens. We have supported many La Quinta events over the years. In fact, today we launched a brand new multimedia campaign on behalf of one of your City's crown jewels. Two billboards at a couple of our most trafficked locations with extensive "on air support from all radio stations. This is the first non-commercial multimedia project that our consolidated companies have undertaken. In the future, all our resources will be considered in support of community events and causes throughout the Valley. We can do so much more than just a sign here or there, or a few radio spots. Realistically, our combined media platforms can reach everybody in the Valley. The City of La Quinta is rapidly growing both residentially and commercially. We want to stand in support of both you and your business constituents. Our tremendous strength as the Valley's leading out -of -home medium is that we — radio and outdoor and bus shelters — are the last media opportunities to influence a decision. We travel in cars, see signs, hear messages the last thing before we act on where to shop, what to eat, where to play golf and what homesite to visit. I am not here just to blow the Morris horn. We are business people and we want to be doing business with you for many years into the future with our billboard company and bus shelter advertising. By City ordinance, we cannot put up more billboards, which is not an unusual reaction. I am not here to try to proliferate billboards in the City of La Quinta. Our structures in your City are aging, we can repair them for ever, but your current ordinance is so tight, so black and white, that we cannot touch our signs to improve them, so to some degree we both have to live with billboard structures we don't necessarily like. Modem technology, design breakthroughs, and landscaping opportunities can mitigate the visual impact of signs. We are not asking for more signs or more bus shelters — we want to keep what we've got, but be able to remodel to today's standards and relocate to support and further the City of La Quinta's development plans. I am here to seek your support in a business decision and to ask for direction from Council for my company to work with La Quinta city staff to try to develop a plan for an acceptable balance of benefits and burdens associated with outdoor advertising, that properly serves the City's interests and supports your dynamically growing business community, and to possibly propose changes to your current ordinances to accommodate preserving a good business balance. May I respond to any questions? 273 020 '„ 3 � v 22 ft. rry f - rt . ` 1i i n spot ,net : : v� �� �` 4165. : K - :.._ CT1 S r f F Y Y / ....M,. r//,,s / ✓ u F • i*', r _ 21 ft. ,,, . 23.5 ft. Ln l F y F 1 . M FFF ....P F / S is : f 16.5 ft. ft. \m -Rip, �;.. LD a 1 M 6 ` 44— r) L ) aPPX.214K 7Ms M z Ell ' �ti sq. ft. 20 ft. ., AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED BILL NUMBER: AB 483 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY 4, 2000 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Wildman FEBRUARY 18, 1999 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 4 An act to &' Res4io- `" " amend Section 5412.1 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to outdoor advertising. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST January 18, 2000 AB 483, as amended, Wildman. Outdoor advertising displays removal compensation: exemptions . The Outdoor Advertising Act prohibits the removal of any lawfully erected advertising display without payment of compensation, as specified. The act exempts from the specified prohibition displays located within residential areas, incorporated agricultural areas, and unincorporated agricultural areas, if the displays meet certain requirements. This bill, additionally, would exempt from the specified prohibition advertising displays located within areas that have been designated redevelopment project areas, parking and business improvement areas, or property and business improvement districts, or areas that have been included in the California Main Street Program, as specified. The bill would also exempt areas that are contiguous to an official state scenic highway, as defined, and areas that are immediately adjacent to a residential area. law Pasift-1110--its aft entl4_9� r vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State -mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: `bss=issi _, s6et9 9i3 54�a 6€ 4he &"Ri ses am1 SECTION I. Section 5412.1 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read: 5412.1. (a) A city, county, -.e*— city and county, or other public agency, whose ordinances or regulations are otherwise in full compliance with Section 5412, is not in violation of that section if the entity elects to require the removal without compensation of any display wk4,e tha t meets all the following requirements: 2 Qv 5. (a) (1) The display meets one of the following conditions as of the date an ordinance or regulation that incorporates the 032 hup://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab-045 ... /ab483 bill 20000104 amended_asm.htm 01/10/2000 AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 2 of 3 provisions of this section either is enacted or becomes applicable to the area and on the date on which a removal requirement is adopted or becomes applicable to the area: (A) The display is located within , or is immediately adjacent to, an area shown as residential on a local general plan IRS as bhla �08449R baseman applinals-le ke the -*Go, (B) (1) The display is located within one of the following: (I) An area that has been designated a redevelopment project under the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code). (II) An area that has been established as a parking and business improvement area under Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code. (III) An area that has been established as a property and business improvement district under Part 7 (commencing with Section 36600) of Division 18 of the Streets and Highways Code. (IV) An area that has been included in the California Main Street Program under Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 15399) of Part 6.7 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. (ii) The city, county, city and county, or other public agency has established findings, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record, that removal of the display is necessary to accomplish any of the following: (I) Expansion, renovation, or repair of existing roads, sidewalks, and other infrastructure. (II) Removal of deteriorated buildings from urban lots to make the properties more attractive to private business. (III) Removal or remediation of environmental contaminants from Superfund sites, brownfield sites, or other contaminated sites. (IV) Installation of transit stops and rail rights -of -way in deteriorated urban areas, older central business districts, and existing neighborhoods. (V) .Completion of residential infill construction projects to meet the housing need of low and moderate income households and seniors, and to meet other housing needs. (VI) Upgrading or expansion of existing commercial businesses and public schools. (VII) Removal of visual blights that interfere with the renovation and redevelopment of deteriorated urban areas, older central business districts, and existing neighborhoods. (C) The display is located within an area that is contiguous to a highway that has been designated an official state scenic highway under Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 260) of Chapter 2 of Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code. (2) The display is not located within 660 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of an interstate or primary highway with its copy visible from the highway, nor is placed or maintained beyond 660 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of an interstate or primary highway with the purpose of its message being read from the main traveled way. --ter— 6 286 (3) The display is not required to be removed because of an overlay zone, combining zone, or any other special zoning district 0 whose primary purpose is the removal or control of signs. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bUYasm/ab-045 ... /ab483 bill 20000104 amended asm.htm 01/10/2000 AB 483 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 3 of 3 --((a) (4) The display is allowed to remain in existence for the period of time set forth below after the enactment or amendment , after January 1, 1983, or for displays affected by the amendments made to this section during the 1999-2000 Regular Session, January 1, 2001, of any ordinance or regulation necessary to bring the entity requiring removal into compliance with Section 5412, and after giving notice of the removal requirement: Fair Market Value on Date of Notice Minimum Years of Removal Requirement Allowed Under $1,999................................. 2 $2,000 to $3,999................................. 3 $4,000 to $5,999................................. 4 $6,000 to $7,999................................. 5 $8,000 to $9,999................................. 6 $10,000 and over .................................. 7 mt_ (b) The amounts provided in this section shall be adjusted each January 1 a€-&* Janwaey 1-r-s9Q�— in accordance with the changes in building costs, as indicated in the United States Department of Commerce Composite Cost Index for Construction Costs. 287 034 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bifl/asm/ab-045 ... /ab483 bill20000104 amended asm.htm 01/10/2000 TAVI 4 4 January 18 P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 April 22, 1999 Assembly Governmental Organization Committee Assembly Member Wesson, Chair Assembly Member Battin, Vice -Chair Assembly Member Ackerman, Member Assembly Member Baugh, Member Assembly Member Cardenas, Member Assembly Member Cardoza, Member Assembly Member Granlund, Member Assembly Member Hetzberg, Member Assembly Member Longville, Member Assembly Member Machado, Member Assembly Member Maldonado, Member Assembly Member Margett, Member Assembly Member Shelley, Member Assembly Member Soto, Member Assembly Member Vincent, Member Assembly Member Wiggins, Member Assembly Member Wright, Member State Capitol Building Sacramento, CA 95814 (760) 777-7000 (TDD) (760) 777-1227 Re: Letter of Support for AB 483 (Wildman) to delete the requirement for cities to pay billboard companies for amortized billboards Dear Assembly Governmental Organization Committee, The City of La Quinta strongly supports the above referenced legislation to delete the requirement for cities to pay billboard companies for the complete value of billboards which are removed. There is perhaps no greater blight to a community than billboards, especially ones that are not wanted by the property owner or city. In many cases, economic development and revitalization efforts are held hostage by not being able to have billboards removed. In La Quinta, billboard companies have demanded millions of dollars per billboard for those billboards which conflict with plans of the private property owner even though these signs were in place on a month -to -month lease. This legislation will help cities in their fight RM 035 April 22, 1999 Assembly Governmental Organization Committee Page 2 against blight and will bring California in line with the rest of the nation in complying with the Supreme Court decisions upholding the validity of local amortization programs. Billboard companies already have protection under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. Please support AB 483 and allow cities to regulate billboards and other signage. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Thomas P. Genovese City Manager C. Mayor City Council Assembly Member Jim Battin League of California Cities ,,.N.V*d 289 036 3. AB 1216 (Floyd); AB 1159 (Granlund). Smoking in Bars and Gaming Clubs. League Position: Under review; Opposition anticipated Bill Status: Pending Assignment to Committee Action: Review and send letters. What the Bills Do: Both AB 1216 and AB 1159 would permit smoking in bars, gaming clubs and taverns if certain conditions are met. AB 1216 does not preempt local authority to regulate smoking in these areas, including a total prohibition. AB 1159 appears to preempt such authority. However, the author's office has informed the League that it is not their intent to preempt local authority and that they will amend the bill to remedy the situation. The League has provided the author's office with language to do just that. Background: Existing law in California, Labor Code Section 6404.5, prohibits smoking in most enclosed places of employment. The smoking prohibition was phased in over time and on January 1, 1998, smoking was prohibited in bars, taverns and gaming club areas. Last year, several legislative attempts to repeal the smoking ban in bars failed. AB 1216 and AB 1159 are the latest legislative efforts to permit smoking ban in bars, taverns and gaming clubs. The League is reviewing the specific language of each bill to determine its effect. We anticipate that the League will oppose both bills, consistent with past League positions on similar bills. Interested cities should review AB 1216 and AB 1159 and send their letters to the authors and the League. Once the bills have been assigned to committees, we will notify cities in the Bulletin. Copies of AB 1216 and AB 1159 are available on CityLink or by contacting the State Capitol Bill Room at 916/445-2323. [League Staff: Yvonne Hunter] 4. AB 483 (Wildman). Outdoor Advertising: Removal. League Position: Support Bill Status: Assembly Governmental Organization Committee; No Date Set Action: Send Support Letters to Members of above Committee and the Assembly Judiciary Committee What the Bill Does: Deletes the requirement in state law which requires local governments to fully compensate billboard companies for complete value of billboards which are removed, even if they have been amortized. Reasons for 'the League's Position: The League supports the ability of cities to regulate billboards and other signage. Background: California law contains some of the most comprehensive protections in the nation against local government billboard removal programs. Billboard removal is a takings issue involving the question of whether or not local regulation requiring the removal of a billboard #11 5 3/19/99 2�d 037 constitutes a "taking" of the billboard owner's property, requiring compensation under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. A series of court decisions across the nation have upheld the validity of local amortization programs, which require removal of billboards after four, five and seven-year periods, without requiring compensation. In California, * local government billboard removal efforts are preempted by state law which requires full compensation even if there are amortization programs. This bill will obviously be hotly -contested, and may be amended in various ways. Cities with concerns regarding billboards, should support this effort to return local authority to enact amortization programs. Letters should contain specific local examples of billboard problems, as. well as the levels of compensation demanded by billboard companies for their removal. Known Support: The League. Known Opposition: No letters yet, but billboard companies are sure to oppose. (See Committee membership after Legislative Activities in this Bulletin.) [League Staff- Daniel Carrigg] 5. SB 177 (Peace). Public Utilities. Eminent Domain. League Position: Support Bill Status: Pending Hearing Date Action: Please Have Your City Review this Bill What the Bill Does: SB 177 would amend the Public Utilities Act to prohibit a public utility that offers competitive services from condemning any property for the purpose of competing with other entities in the offering of those competitive services. Reason for League's Position: The authority of public utilities, telecommunications companies in particular, under the law is much too broad and can be used to threaten the public property and services of public agencies. This bill reduces the emninent domain authority of telecommunciations companies. Background: The Public Utilities Act authorizes certain public utilities to condemn property. Known Support: City of San Francisco and Building Owners and Managers Association of California. Known Opposition: None. [League Staff. Natasha Fooman] #11 6 3/19/99 291 T44 4 XP Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: Discussion of City Council Goals RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: Discuss City Council goals for Fiscal Year 2000-01. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: No direct fiscal implications will result from this action. Staff proposes to develop programs to implement selected goals and will identify cost projections as part of the economic development program, capital improvement program, and budget process. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: At the February 16 and March 16, 1999 City Council meetings, the City Council held Study Sessions regarding Council Goals for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. As the Council may recall, the table provided last year included four categories for each City Council goal. The categories were as follows: • Economic Development Plan; • Capital Improvement Plan; • Budget; and • Other/Comments The goals that could be attributed to one of the components of the Strategic Planning Process (i.e., Economic Development Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Annual Budget) were incorporated into those documents for Fiscal Year 1999- 2000. A copy of the 1999-2000 City Council Goals is included as Attachment 1 for reference and discussion purposes. 292 Staff has placed this matter on today's agenda to give the City Council an opportunity to identify priority goals for Fiscal Year 2000-01 as a precursor to this year's budget process. Once goals are identified, staff will integrate the stated goals into this year's Economic Development Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, and the City Budget. Respectfully submitted, r Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. 1999-2000 City Council Goals 293 002 ATTACHMENT 1 rn � y °) v u, C C o o c m o c Z U cn c c o W c c *' c C E Q N CD C `�- 0 m C o cco a)co co ` O y ` L ` a W c c m'� c o° c _ E -0 : o C C +� co �- U A U >. >` (n y O O c4� c c— U c *' C c `O E C c U N O a) N c O N N � A N cn •� N .'" O V v U U +_ m U CL ti 0 U U co'a coi U W J m 'J Z .0 c .c C _I W 4= o :t o Z W Z J ,0 o -0,� c 0-� Va 0. a c� U 0 1 U c U a ° c 4° o U a U U � U W O a a p- w a U W W m C 4-J O 0 O c Q. cN cn o E a) -o c LL Y m E L. 0)L- U a) cv -p •— .— m 0_ N O c a c '- 'c N O °' coo o• E c �' a E o O C .c C .c m N > 0 U cp L O > � co O tm 2 m N 2 O O a > U p J O ton O O= U U U m N M c} LA (6 294 00 Z W W c c c c c F— ++ 0 c c c c c C .. a E U .a a) CD I— a rn ca c c � o U m m J a _ � — � � O CD -j Z U W iZ Z W O Q O a H U W 0 Z ` o 'M a L aa) a. (1) O � J 0- m LLI CO)+• c W W o ci 0 V cn M 0 � c CD � U ,� CD = m � c o m 0 c o U J � ��ccc mC �4" �� a aE��' �E ~�-° °�� �� o E .2_ N Q U c Q 4 F a O Q c p c c� cC X N(D p m U c p 0 :c Q U U a) N o U .� N N t iL ` O N� cn N m� > > 0 C c j O uU) �o oU') Qo ° v� Qa O N (M d L6 29a 00 y Z W O a)cr- W c C C O c c c L ti L L L ►.. U U U L- +, (D m " � (D (D 4, am (D a) L- +r . a) a) " +, a) a) 'a a co -0 N 'a 05 rn U ik cnrn� CW7 cc c ��N c'a cc�c c cl o U p, m o� U a, m o V m m o L U C, m o v Q, m y D m a) ,C N L t CD ,C a) ` L a) C CD L .0 aa) ) C ` C a ) .0 ` C J .fl > -Q > -C : -C > > _ _ _ O J Z Q Z F- W Z O a0a U U a U Z c (� W +j c o 5 S Gf.Z L O a Q ZOJ �- OWE' �av U (0W c c o W W O 0 U U E o L E L O ( o o C o o E a a +' c -0 ° a0 a� ccvU o V L y=. Q E aEi o� Q a� o j Q c o _ m o +� 0 0 c 0 +� - ,o m a� m CL Q C7 o U C cco ++ o a n +r - m +� a) '�v Z c �, m CoX a) c L wQ 6 Q L C >> m E` C E m d� ca m N L- C "a > c Co 0CU UC ILJt-U CU Q ccn UU C7 (6 06 o) O •-- N eM I- r- I — 1 N N N N 296 006 CD E (n N F- W (moo '0 O cc to c ix c W c c o c _ > > a F- 2.+� N O j c U U o Z U .c W C7 f/1 tm c N c n .c N CA c .n .c 0 .n .c U (U O r- U Q) tC O r- U Q) w Cl).0 N a) .c O 0 ,c a) :3 O U J W a�Z += _ o L Z D ~>a o O Q 0 N V (> a c c U H U H c V W o : c 0 Z ° �DaQ . Z O � a- co a. a) OJ W awn WW c o 0 o 0 0 U U c a' E •3c +� o E NL- 0c 0oN N C N •0 ca N coi a +a-' aci ` cE o oo ` p a c E m 0 �_ . ° cv y E c W N C G m X U .0 cn m. o c E -v > > y > a) c Q ((aa •- c a) N rn x p O —� U O co U O O c oC N O S U s (n (5.9 O CC w "` 97 N N N N N N m M m VA m t H �a G a`) Z m -o C w c CW E 0 (D G O %- '0 C V O N N c�0 7 M N N .E .r i W c 'FD c c c c 0 c = 7 C p > > > 'a O O E 7 om E O C co C C C C C O Q N O O 0 F y O C >> > > U 7 U = > N Q O O "O 7 U LL U U CL> U W J m O F- c c c J z W J` c O` c C c O Z W Z O` CU > J -p .� m -p myo a� a� a� G. Q- d o- V �' V C — c C — C — U c c G. ° c 0 ° c c 4 c O U O U C U C.) N U Z C C U W c o Oa .o ... � .►_ L z O J N CL a) a) CL C W W p O � p 0 p U U E � � � rn rn c 'n. c E o 'E U c o co N C sa a (n � c��o 00co _o a co c o c ca 'v E > CD F- Q C cn U 0 C) lM M M cM M eM d • LAWV• W CD Cl) rQ^ V J_ Z V w Z ~ W Q O QOa v U a V � ci w a Z 0 Z O a w W W G J O 0 N N co N N c y c M c M c _c 0.0 •` O -0 r_ 07 M 'C C U 0) c0 '� - .n L a� o E ` O ° N w .o m `O E CL y— N E U 2 N O OC c U MM �r- o � c ` �p 3: ` O .O .° (u � ° coo 'cc o c o 'cv o w c w � c c U O U c U U ° 2= o C7 aci N E -p E M O V C `�- O N aC �Wui U U O � C CD E w 4- O Y N O 0 U c c L O 4)a co-o o w in c c O ° U It Oo It E 299 I�- W c� C O � T U `m CD W c c H . C 4- c a� a� U U W G m J F- J Z LLJ Z W Z O QOa V V a V W O a Q Z O W a W W 4 +r +� c +� c 0 °' C co Q °) c� _ c J O Ea v) O� O t '- N 7 N d m C7 O co + , �ca roea�� y C E C -c d>Ui= CL ,ul LO LO v CL of rn (6 M O U) J Q O J_ U Z Z) O i V O CL co co a Al 300 010 City Council Goals for 2000-2001 From City Council Meeting of 2/15/2000 Councilman Adollh 1. Concentrate on the Commercial Development on Highway 1 1 1. 2. Concentrate on development of Hotels and Motels in the Miles/Washington Avenue corridor. Councilman Perkins 1. Control the uses permitted for future development of commercial property on Highway 111. Mayor Peria 1. Move forward with the development of the Library. 2. Provide affordable golf facility for the community. 3. Increase the number of playing fields in city parks. 4. Increase Code Enforcement area. 5. Look at expansion of the City Hall. 6. Look at increases in Public Safety staff and services such as Ambulance service. 7. Look at the City's General Plan regarding the quality of development required. Mayor Pro Tern Sniff Additions to his list: 25. Increase office space and storage space in the civic center. 26. Do a Highway 1 1 1 Master Plan process. 301 T4'!t 4 (Pa�rw MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Thomas Genovese, City Manager Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Dawn Honeywell, City Attorney FROM: Council Member Terry Henderson DATE: February 15, 2000 SUBJECT: Council Goals for 2000-2001 1. Signage - both permanent and temporary for Village commercial. 2. Continue obelisk programs. 3. Permanent program to maintain art at Washington. 4. Investigate if we can get relief at 52 and Washington; hard left 52 onto Washington. 5. Ongoing: A. Library improvement B. Museum improvement C. Infrastructure improvement 6. Lot next to Mini Park. Mini Park inside of Saguaro -Sagebrush area. 7. Set permanent date for joint meeting of Planning Commission and Council. 302 T4ht 4 4 Q" MEMORANDUM. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Thomas Genovese, City Manager Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager Dawn Honeywell, City Attorney FROM: Mayor Pro Tem Stanley Sniff S�—S DATE: February 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Council Goals for 2000-2001 1. Complete all the improvements in assessment districts, civic center campus, etc. Village - implement and complete. 2. Highway 111 cleanup (trailer parks). 3. Our new library plans/financing on civic center campus. 4. Purchase and enlarge La Quinta Historical Society Museum. 5. Work with other valley cities for transfer station. 6. Insurance for former City Council Members who have served at least two full terms. 7. Financial support for La Quinta Arts Foundation and La Quinta Chamber of Commerce. Visitor's Center??? 8. Build another mini park. Establish a program to build one new park each year for 10 years. 9. Annexations - large and small. 10. Sound walls - Montero Estates, etc. 11. Push, push, push for commercial development, hotels, motels and retail!!! 303� Council Goals 2000-2001 cont. 12. Promote "Shop La Quinta," "Visit La Quinta," Dine La Quinta," "Live La Quinta." 13. Ambulance service. 14. Public -private partnerships (where feasible). 15. Promote and implement property upgrades - commercial and residential. 16. La Quinta Civic Awards Program. 17. Purchase Nickelson property for a "La Quinta Village Tower Project" (restaurants, stores, parking). 18. Building of parking lot on our Montezuma, Bermudas, Navarro property. 19. Purchase the property located at Calle Tampico and Eisenhower (NE corner). Build some commercial along Tampico with balance of property to be a complete "La Quinta Senior Village" - affordable housing with attractive amenities - fun; secure; affordable; a limited professional area for doctors, lawyers, investment counseling, etc. 20. Continue to build general fund. 21. Purchase, if reasonable, the apartments at the corner of Tampico and Eisenhower and rebuild - affordable "live -shop" concept. 22. A directional (and enhanced) sign program that is clear in daylight, illuminated at night and consistent throughout the City - remember "La Quinta Means Business". Business must be actively supported and promoted - they win, we win. 23. Northern park - build and name. "La Quinta Park"? Multiple fields - soccer, baseball, community center. 24. Find way to upgrade trailer parks (Dune Palms and Miles). 304 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD Meeting January 12, 2000 CALL TO ORDER Regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairperson Osborne, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Irwin, Lewis(5:47), Moulin, Mahfoud(5:43), Olander, and Chairman Osborne ABSENT: Board Member Bulgrin OTHERS PRESENT: Ken AI -Imam, Conrad & Associates, John Falconer, Finance Director and Debbie DeRenard, Secretary II PUBLIC COMMENT - None III CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed IV CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of Meeting on December 8, 1999 for the Investment Advisory Board. Chairman Osborne advised that he was not present at the December meeting and the minutes need to be changed to reflect Vice Chairman Mahfoud as calling the meeting to order. Board Member Moulin advised that the minutes need to reflect that he was not present at the meeting in December. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Irwin/Moulin to approve the Minutes of December 8, 1999 as corrected. Motion carried unanimously. 305 Investment Advisory Board Minutes V BUSINESS SESSION January 12, 2000 A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for November 1999 Board Member Irwin noted the decrease in the investment in LAIF. Mr. Falconer advised that on the December "snapshot" report it indicates the LAIF investment amount is down 5'/2 million to 6 million dollars. He further advised that the investment is well below the required benchmark set forth in the Investment Policy. In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. Falconer advised that on page five the column - Expected Maturity Value will be changed to reflect the par value amount for the securities purchased in November. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Irwin/Olander to review, receive and file the Treasurers Report for November 1999. Motion carried unanimously. VI CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. City of La Quinta FY 98/99 Audited Financial Statement Mr. Falconer introduced Mr. Ken AI -Imam of Conrad & Associates who will present the Audited Financial Statement to the Board. Ken AI -Imam presented the audited financial statement advising that the purpose of the audit is to ascertain whether the financial statements of the City are in 100 percent compliance. He further advised that the auditing profession has set forth specific procedures when performing audits for local governments and entities. He explained that his firm has developed an investment compliance checklist that subjects the City's investments to compliance in 43 different areas. 2 306 002 Investment Advisory Board Minutes January 12, 2000 In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. AI -Imam advised that the investment in LAIF is verified directly by Conrad and Associates with the LAIF Investment Office in Sacramento. Even though the firm reviews the statements from LAIF that is sent to the City they do not rely upon the statements - the investment is confirmed directly with LAIF. In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. AI -Imam advised that his firm services 35 cities in California and in regards to mark -to -market only one city out of 35 makes an entry in their general ledger each month to adjust their investments to market value. Most of the cities just show cost in the treasurer's report and at the end of the year, they will present the market value in the financial statements. The accounting standard states that if there is a big difference between market value and amortized costs - then it has to be shown on the financial statement. In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. AI -Imam clarified that some municipalities do account for investments on a mark -to -market. Mr. Falconer advised that if the City did account for investments on a mark -to -market, the gain or loss would have to be spread across all thirty funds. In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. Falconer advised that the new reporting standard goes into effect in the year 2002/03. He advised that the City will still be required to prepare the current statements, but in addition the City will need to prepare some consolidating statements. Mr. AI -Imam advised that it will look a little different, but it will have the exact same data that is reported under the current accounting standards. There will just be two additional schedules in the front of the report. In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. AI -Imam advised that as it relates to cash investments there were no audit test exceptions. He further advised there were no audit adjustments made or proposed in this area and he had no disagreements. He further advised that the only comment made regarding cash and investments was in that all local 3 307 0Oq Investment Advisory Board Minutes January 12, 2000 governments are struggling with the very strict 30-day timeline in the state government code that requires municipalities to reconcile accounts, bank and investment statements and do the allocations to all the funds and prepare a treasurers report for the City Council within 30 days of the end of each quarter. Virtually none of the firms' clients can make this deadline. As auditors the firm is required to communicate when an exception is made against the Government Code. This has been communicated to the Finance Director, but the firm does not consider this to be a material instance of a noncompliance, it is a very difficult objective to accomplish in the State Government Code. Mr. Falconer advised that in addition to the Treasurers Report, Staff submits to the City Council an investment summary that lists the investments and pooled cash that the City has on hand each quarter. In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. Falconer advised that the thirty - day period is hard to accomplish due to the fact that the City does not receive the bank statements or the fiscal agent statement until the middle of the month. He advised that he prepares an investment summary report for the City Council and will include it in the IAB agenda packet in February. Board Member Moulin advised that the comments by Mr. AI -Imam give him a lot of comfort and he appreciates his firm attending the meeting. Mr. AI -Imam advised that the City of La Quinta's Investment Committee, the City Council and Staff have done a very good job raising the standards for the City of La Quinta. There are no weaknesses that need to be attended to at this time. The firm is satisfied with the internal controls of the City. B. Month End Cash Report - December 1999 Noted and Filed. 4 308 004 Investment Advisory Board January 12, 2000 Minutes C. Pooled Money Investment Board Reports - October 1999 Board Member Irwin advised that in response to Pat Beal's comments regarding investing in small banks in order to spread money to local banks, he advised that he disagrees with her comments and feels that the rate that LAIF earns investing in small banks benefits the small banks because they can pick up 10 - 15 basis points which are in the banks favor and goes against the State. LAIF is getting less than market yields by investing in local banks and there is to some extent a safety issue. Mr. Falconer advised that it was described to him by LAIF that they were able to get a higher yield on some collateral CD's compared to what they would have received on a T-bill or T-note. This was one of the reasons given for investing in small banks. In response to Chairman Osborne, Mr. Falconer advised that the time frame on the CD's ranges from six months to one year. Board Member Lewis advised that he is not real concerned over the safety issue, but he found their reasoning behind reverse repurchase agreements to be interesting. He advised that he feels that this is "classic yield chasing." Anytime you start to chase yields, you leave yourself open to problems. He further advised that his personal opinion is that LAIF is becoming a less attractive investment vehicle. He suggested rolling some of the commercial paper over and reduce the reliance on LAIF. In response to Chairman Osborne, Mr. AI -Imam advised that it is not the firms' roll to comment on investment strategies of LAIF. He further advised that the firm encourages their clients as a part of their internal control to look at LAIF's investment policies and practices and make sure it's consistent with the agencies' investment policies. In response to Board Member Olander, Mr. AI -Imam advised that a lot of his clients have 40 to 50 percent of their investments with LAIF. He advised that this isn't a guideline. As a rule of auditors they do not comment on investments. He further advised that he is not sure that all his clients have been as conscientious as the City of La Quinta - Investment Advisory Board asking the right questions and looking at LAIF with the scrutiny that's warranted. 5 309 nnt.,i Investment Advisory Board Minutes January 12, 2000 Board Member Lewis advised that he's still comfortable with LAIF to an extent, but less comfortable than he was previously. Chairman Osborne advised that he feels LAIF is a necessary investment vehicle for the City in regards to liquidity. At the City's standpoint of having less than twenty percent invested in LAIF there is not a need for concern, but he feels that LAIF's percentages in certain investments are growing in the wrong direction from where they were one year ago. Board Member Irwin suggested investing more with money market funds and banks in the context of liquidity and buying shorter term paper. Mr. Falconer advised that from Staff's standpoint a large amount of bond proceeds are already invested in mutual funds. He further advised that currently the City could be fine investing in these mutual funds but when the City issues future assessment bonds (which the City is planning on in the future), the City will have five million dollars come in and this will all have to be re-evaluated. He advised that LAIF also has same day. liquidity and they do not have to meet the SEC requirements of money market funds. He advised that he would be hard pressed to meet the 20 percent for mutual funds as set forth on the Government Code. In response to Board Member Irwin, Mr. Falconer advised that 30-day commercial paper would be a lot of work and does not give same day liquidity without market risk. He further advised that if the City had to write an emergency check it would be a problem. He further advised that he doesn't recommend the total elimination of LAIF as an investment vehicle. Board Member Moulin advised that as the City grows, Staff is going to have to devote more time in actively managing the investment portfolio. VIII BOARD MEMBER ITEMS - None In response to Board Member Moulin, Mr. Falconer advised that historically the Board begins review of the investment policy in March. 1.1 310 6nf Investment Advisory Board Minutes January 12, 2000 Board Member Moulin requested that at the time the Board begins to review the Investment Policy he would like the document that he prepared regarding San Bruno, Santa Rosa and Oceanside brought back to the Board. IX ADJOURNMENT MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Lewis/Moulin to adjourn the meeting at 6:23 p.m.. Motion carried unanimously. Submitted by, Debbie DeRenard Secretary 31.1 007 REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: /6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA January 5, 2000 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:00 a.m. A. This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Committee was called to order at 10:02 a.m. by Planning Manager Christine di Iorio who led the flag salute. B. Committee Members present: Bill Bobbitt, Dennis Cunningham, and Frank Reynolds. C. Staff present: Planning Manager Christine di Iorio, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Executive Secretary Betty Sawyer. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of December 8, 1999. There being no corrections, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 99-664; a request of Tiburon Homes, LLC for approval of architectural plans for three new prototype residential units located on the north side of Airport Boulevard, east of Madison Street within the Norman Golf Course. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report and noted revised elevations were submitted prior to the meeting, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Committee Member Cunningham asked if the applicant had anything to say. Mr. Peter Jacobs, representing Marvin Homes, asked for an amendment to Condition #1 as there was no way they could have the landscaping plans submitted for approval prior to pulling building permits. He asked that the condition be reworded to be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Their landscaping plans had not been drawn as of yet and would have to go the CAMy Documents\WPD0CS\ALRCI-5-00.wpd 312 Architectural & Landscape Review Committee January 5, 2000 approval process with KSL, the Homeowners' Association, ALRC, and Planning Commission and they could not do this prior to wanting to pull building permits. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated he had no objection and asked staff if there was any internal check system to monitor this. Staff stated it would be better to require the approval prior to final inspections. 4. Committee Member Bobbitt stated he had no problem as long as the landscaping plans were approved prior to installation. Staff stated that requiring them to submit their plans prior to final inspection of the first residential unit would meet that requirement. 5. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 2000-001 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 98-664, subject to conditions as amended: a. Condition #1: modified to stated prior to approval of ALRC and Planning Commission before final inspection of the first residential unit. Unanimously approved. B. Site Development Permit 99-665; a request of Steven Walker Homes for approval of architectural plans for three new prototype residential units located on the north side of Airport Boulevard, east of Madison Street within the Norman Golf Course. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Mr. Hans Anderle of Bassenian Lagoni Architects, went over the design elevatiops for the Committee. 3. Committee Member Cunningham stated that the rear elevation did not have much architectural detail, but, in his opinion, that is better. He approved of the designs as submitted and stated that being on the Norman Course it allows the architect more freedom for design by not having to meet the compatibility issue. 4. Committee Member Bobbit asked if the rear landscaping would be maintained by Homeowners' Association (HOA) or homeowners. Mr. Dan Beal, Project Manager for Steven Walker Homes, stated it would be the responsibility of the homeowner. C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ALRCI-5-OO.wpd 2 313vU' Architectural & Landscape Review Committee January 5, 2000 5. Committee Member Bobbitt asked if the sideyard had landscaping or was it drainage purposes. Mr. Beal stated if would be landscaped with a five foot high wall. 6. Committee Member Cunningham asked the depth of the lots. Mr. Beal stated they were 170 feet. They will be offering a rear yard pool as more than 80% of the homebuyers were requesting the pool. 7. Committee Member Reynolds asked the location of the lots in comparison to the Tiburon houses. Mr. Beal identified the location on the map. 8. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Reynolds to adopt Minute Motion 2000-002 approving Site Development Permit 99-665, as amended: a. Condition #1: landscaping submitted to ALRC and Planning Commission for approval prior to final inspection of the first residential unit. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None V. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None VI. ADJOURNMENT: ' There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Cunningham/Bobbitt to adjourn this regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to the next regular meeting to be held on February 2, 2000. This meeting was adjourned at 10:27 a.m. on January 5, 2000. Respectfully submitted, T . SAWYER, Executive Secretary Ci La Quinta, California VU3 C:\My Documents\WPD0CS\ALRCl-5-00.wpd 3 314 -r-Q DEPARTMENT REPORT: i - A o • V - S OF �ti TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager DATE: February 15, 2000 RE: Department Report - Response(s) to Public Comment The following is the response to public comments made at the February 1, 2000 City Council meeting: 1. Ms. Audrey Ostrowsky, P.O. Box 351, addressed the City Council regarding Federal funds for sewer improvements and an explanation of a Closed Session item. • No additional response was necessary as correspondence has previously been sent to Ms. Ostrowsky regarding Federal funds for sewer improvements and the City Attorney advised Ms. Ostrowsky regarding the Closed Session item. 2. Mr. Jim Murphy, 54-580 Riviera Drive, and Mr. Robert Faulk, President of PGA West Master Association, addressed the City Council regarding the equestrian trail along the east side of Madison Street. • No additional response was necessary as the City Council referred this matter to staff, and an item regarding this matter has been placed on the February 15, 2000 City Council Agenda. 3. Mr. Seth Etinger, 78-720 Avenida La Fonda, addressed the City Council regarding the Calle Rondo drainage channel project. • Staff is in continued contact with Mr. Etinger regarding the project's status. 315 4. Ms. Joyce Sivley, 79-775 Westward Ho Drive, addressed the City Council regarding the proposed sewer improvements and the City's sewer subsidy program. • Staff spoke with Ms. Sivley during the Council Meeting and answered her questions regarding the sewer subsidy program. 5. Mr. Mike Smith, 78-467 Calle Orense, addressed the City Council regarding a sound wall for Montero Estates. • Staff sent correspondence to Mr. Smith on the current status of a sound wall for Montero Estates. 3Ira 002 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3-A CITY COUNCIL'S UPCOMING EVENTS FEBRUARY 15 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 24 CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD MARCH 3 MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE MARCH 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 11 CITY ANIMAL RABIES CLINIC MARCH 13 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - RIVERSIDE DIVISION MEETING IN THE COURTYARD MARCH 16-19 LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL MARCH 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 23 CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD MARCH 31 MAINSTREET MARKETPLACE APRIL 4 C17Y COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27 CULTURE IN THE COURTYARD 317 MAY 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 16 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 23-25 ICSC CONFERENCE IN LAS VEGAS JUNE 6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 20 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 318 February 2000 Monthly Planner �Mdrfft I 2 �00 3 4 5 2:00 PM City Council �o Meeting Me i 1 6 17 8 9 10 ill 12 12:00 PM Coun- 7:00 PM C.V. 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM cil Mtg/Torres- Martinez Mosquito Abate. -Perkins Pena 15:30 PM Invest- Energy/Envi- Sniff 7:00 PM Council 7:00 PM Plan- ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural i Mtg/Thermal ning Commis- Board Arts Commission I Comm. Council sion Meeting ill i 13 14 15 16 17 19 12:00PIVICVAG 9:00AMCVB- 3:30 PM Historic Transp-Perkins Henderson Preservation 7:00 PM Commu- 2:00 PM City Commission nity Services Council Commission Meeting D 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 President's 7:00 PM Plan- 14:00 PM DRRA Day ning Commis- Airp-Henderson (Holiday) sion Meeting 27 28 29 12:30 PM RCTC Budget -Pena January M March a8 16:00 PM CVAG- M S M T W T IF S T IF S S M T W T F S M T Exec Com-Pena 2 3 4 2 3 1 8 5 6 7 8 6 7 1 2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 5 6 7 9 10 11 16 17 18 3 1 4 1 5 12 13 14 15 1 19 20 21 22 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 3 4 1 1 1 23 24 25 8 9 26 27 28 29 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0 1 30 31 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 02/09/2000 26 27 28 29 30 31 315 March 2000 Monthly Planner I OM&UM 2 12:00 PM February April Mayor's Lunch S M T WT F S S M T W T F S 1 2 T 4-5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 9 10 16 17 1 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 2223 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 16 10 2:00 PM City 9:00 AM RCTC- 12:00 PM 9:00 AM Animal Council Pena Energy/Envi- Rabies Clinic Meeting 5:30 PM Invest- Sniff ment Advisory 7:00 PM Cultural Board Arts Commission 12 i13 14 15 16 17 18 10:00 AM CVAG 7:00 PM C.V. 3:30 PM Historic Public Safety- Perkins Mosquito Preservation Abate. -Perkins Commission i 12:00 PM CVAG Transp-Perkins 7:00 PM Plan- ning Commis - St. Patrick's 7:00 PM Commu- sion Meeting Day nity Services Commission 19 120 21 122 23 24 25 9:00 AM CVB- 12:00 PM CVAG Henderson Human/Com- 2:00 PM City Adolph Council 14:00 PM DRRA Meeting Airp-Henderson 26 27 28 '29 30 31 2:30 PM RCTC 7:00 PM Plan - Budget -Pena ning Commis- '6-00 PM CVAG- sion Meeting Exec Com-Pena li Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 02/09/2000 '10 38� DEPARTMENT REPORT: q' A o • U _ I ti� w5 OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tom Hartung, Director of Building & Safety T4- DATE: February 15, 2000 RE: Monthly Department Report - January 2000 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and business licenses for the month of January. The reports depict the following highlights: • Year to date building permit valuation is $18,950,991 which represents an issuance of 279 building permits through January; • 236 animal control cases have been handled through January; • 168 code compliance cases have been initiated through January; • 14 new licenses were issued to La Quinta based businesses in January. 321 ccoo L CN rn 00 o N o r r 00 LU V Q r O r U N CD N g� N a v J m � � N co O 4. x r V Z F- o LL> N �o C6 N r Q O 0 O o O LO N O o M r Cl O LO ti O r O r (D O r O N N O O o 00 O O O O Uf Q � O h co O N O I� M 0 O co O_ 00 N O O LO co I- CD co N L � L j tOC) ONO V O N Wr m 00 LO O N M 1- 00 LL M Cl V O c0 O O Cl r O O LO N N N O O O O m O r 00 Cl O O O 0 O Ih O 0 Lt7 = I-- r h O O r I- m o N O I- m LO CD Cl 00 O O Lc) I- co W M w t- CD NV v 0r cM co 0) CD d v_ Ln Ln 00 r 0 N M N co O 1� c N M co M � Cl O O Co O O O O O Cl O o O O Cl O O O V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O co r O O O Ln cD O o 11- O o O Cl N M N Q LM I� O O N 00 M v LO co 0 M o O O O M d' O � Z r T ti O Ln Ln N r- cM N I- O N r LL% Z Q O O O J LO O) 0 CA r CDr LLi LO r 0 N co LO C4 r O d H } Q g cc J O O O O O o O O Cl O O O O O O O N O M O O O CD O O O O O (D O O O I- OO CR U. i r O 00 co O O o o r O o O M O o M 00 r- d Z Z Q M CD r 00 co O O M 00 M cn C� o Ln m N I� O co r CA -- CA CA O_ r r 00 d h r r N 00 O O Z O O r N W CD 000 C7 00 H O O O � O Co O O Cl O O O O O Cl O O lD m Vi N O M O O O O O O O O O cD O O O Il 00 r O 00 cD O O O O r O O o co O o Cl) CO r 0= M r co O 00 Cl) O cM I- CD CA 0 V zco 00 O CM M CD 0 N Cl r r 0 O r r 00 t7 V ti r r N r 00 O N O 0) O O co 00 r M CO r O O r N o M r M �' co CD O O r CM N N CO CCV) 0 0 — W N 0 O 00 O h O N r N co r O O LO 0 0) CA 93 O r d LN N Q Z W r ar 0 0 0 00 CA 0 p 00 O ~ Cl N LO r N CD CL p W r r 0 N d= r Z) Q W Z Q Q 2 J O Q Z Q W Q J Z w Q Q Q Q Z z w z z c9 lai oUC a O LL 1 W Z Z w Q pp (n J J O W W W W co W J t 2 0 m ~ V 2 � O W U O a Q tZ z Z D m O � m O Oo LU U W -1 O O m W Q Q Z O W W F- O in U m W 12 a a O a (D U I W I W H 322 002 ANIMAL PICKUPS MONTHLY Dogs Alive Dead Cats Alive Dead Alive 0_ Dead __ 7 TOTAL ANI Alive _ 50 Dead 25_ TOTAL ANIMALS REMOVED 75 ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT FOR: _January, 2 N YEAR TO INCIDENTS DATE: HANDLED: __-43 Bite reports __1__4 Animal trap set ups ---i Cruelty to Animals Investigations VIOLATIONS: No owner Contact Dogs at large _24 Noise disturbance _1 Defecation removal 0 License violation —0 Other -0 Monthly Total —25- YEAR TO DATE --25 TOTAL MONTHLY INCIDENTS HANDLED: 23-6 - Vicious Animal Restraining order YEAR TO MONTHLY DATE: Special hour patrols Zoning Violations Lost & found reports Animal Rescue Outside agency assistance City hall reclaims Other TOTALS Warnings Citations 1� 9 4 4 1 _12 1 _l 17 �2 -_17 _-22 TOTAL YEAR TO DATE INCIDENTS HANDLED: 2a6- -2— _2__ _ 4 -A- 0 _0 1 6 --9- 0 18 -3$ 0 —A __1 19 -1G_ l6 _2Z 97 323 003 CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR: January, 2000 ABATEMENTS: YEAR TO DATE: Nuisance Abatements Started 51 5.1_ Weed Abatements Started 12- _ _12— Vehicle Abatements Started -_5__ Dwelling Abatements Started �Q _ 20— TOTAL STARTED 168 __1.6$___ TOTAL COMPLETED 229 _229 Home �ation Inspections Business License Inspections _-13— 13 Public Service_1.4— _314 (_age salmipermits Issued 113 113 324 OC�4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000080000 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y to f� O O a to, a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z Z w 2 a_ CYU w O w O IL p j U 7 Z W Z 0 w 0 xx ¢ zza N ~ J rU_� a0�v' 'nv � W Ux�Y)0O g W W w w Z CL w Z yO OU0E03w0-F-Q J�Q�wC7¢UJp u a Z} a W O w p U wZZ) W dD�r ¢z wOppO VwQQ=mzZ)>z IU OO QOa aO¢22x(nUUfn❑�Ux� N GO 0 0 0) m W 00 m 0 M arovornrnoco IT 0) N Lp�NqNQ N � rn C t� i O 1z ; ;zr ;z a��2��,^.��rr� .000000000000000 I t0 (0 (O co 0 0 0 w 0 0 w 0 0 w a MLC) 0 0 0 LO LO LO LO 0 to U) U) LO 0 aNNNNNNNN N N NN Cl N rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn0)rnrn0) m U U, I¢ ¢ ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ d d ¢ ¢ ¢ a U U U U U U U U U U U U U U F<I¢-F HFd-F¢-�F¢"-H4d F F¢-F¢-H •'zzZZZZZzzzzzZZ 7D»DD»D»7» M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �'ggggg!sggg3gngg Z g 0 2< W QQ 0 W w w 0❑ W W Q D ¢ F- ¢ W m z¢ W w 3 Z H<W l a}F-❑af w V wmMZ§adorn 28xQ ry O O Lo to In U) O !9 Cn M 0 ail f- O O LO O 0 M A Oi w N N N 0� 0A rl W U) Lo LL U) Lo� LL7 V IN sco 00 O U LL Y Z Q ¢ U O � 5 M U } a w O wmw In z U UO� W Z CD Z > z 0 U O Z O w J Z w LL~ P LLI F- W W Z ZR LU fn U)�w w❑U?2 w;¢ ::)�Ir a7Mww0 ZWLZF-- ¢ U o O¢ W J d�- z 3w O O Zd w j N EU�F¢WMWWw ZZj=wwO�wwZ—w0Ow- UIi00 gzMm=Z)wUOww¢vw Qw O LLZ)x a¢mUU❑❑ W Iiac(nF- O coI— 0 1- to c0 N ro O V c0 a0 V O� M a0 Z =, CO T 0) OOi 00 O 000 O 00 CO T O m O w 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Z 32) k3 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 6'A c&t�p 4 4 " TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: JERRY HERMAN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2000 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY Attached please find a copy of the Community Development Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of January. 32G PAMonthly Department Report.wpd z W F— Q a W z W E O J W W 0 z CD CG G O V O P: C.) O H a U Cl) -p C � +r a� a 0 U O O a) a) a) a) a) a) a) O a) a) a) ++ +J 4, _ ++ ++ _ ++ +J +1 � ++ + V 4� : +J _ +� t E E E E E E E E E N E E E cn 7 7 O O 7 7 7 O 7 O 7 O O N (n cn cn cn w cn V) U) cn U) U) N M .- M O N CO i- O CY) N r— L O �- N C N 0O C a) H c -I.-a) E LL -� (n E y _i c N O +-� c ai c o +� E O (D E U) Q U y a) cn c a) Q- Q cn Al-�, E U c a) L Q > ' O E cn o a cn U UO E c > CL LL U I _oj H U w 0 U)N w 3 I7 0 0 A U O C co > ca o a CO V w OC w p 0 p N� N U p O Q Op0 CV U a) O .0 > C c a V 0 0 M O N NNN� C� r- v- N a U U U p 0 N O NN Nn N M a U C cn 0 U) +J Q) a) �O +O N c p +� co n p y- a) N p C. O O O 4' 0 E N a) E �, _O O J a co LO a) a) M C O a 0 co 4- L, a Q Cn a) M O L -O C '� O cy)0 CL Q i �= O 'C ) o O O LT O C) > 'c a) Cl)cu O a) 0 0) O >_ c �- L> co +_ co O 070 4- g O co a) c O O "- 0 a) N> co a) O C a) i a) C O a) '� N N cl)co ,� +' LL_ C C L - co C Q s =p O }, _ +- O' 0 0 Cp O C O O U C a a) U +' C) C Q O ca n3 coo E ++ cco U o �' co v 4- E cc o� 0 co Cu M Oo .►- CL -c°0 O rn mc E O 0 4- N a) C O �_ O >, -i O O a C LO co "O C co O CO= cca 4 N V O Ec v a ai °� CO cco a) c`v o O E m CN m cow cn CN c c �� Q•�^ 4- rn°t cn C N�d >O- E Oa C v) — O O 'L7 C O E a) c c a) r- a) Q "a .0 0 � N � O L U +.� r- E 00 cn a) F— a) "D ' c N G� c CO a L co co 'O r- +� 4-- C �— a) c� C C E t� a a) co L >, p) cn C r- >. — _ O C r- a >� +-' C U) O _O m cn O- co CL +J co C a) O O 0 r- O fn a) .� C O E> O r- C ca O _ c> (o _ O 2 a) � O C C a) a) 07 N n a) +j o c ca a) �° -p >� Cc O C U c N a) a °r - C O C n > o c L 00 LL O M 0 N O a) cv O O O •N O- ++ �.- co Vj co E c cn O O 0 a L >' � co E p T 5 0 c _ � cn 0 0 cn O _ a) a) C O cu- U 0 0 Q N O cn O N 2 a`) OC �+ - "O to Q)= io C U 0 E 0 0 LO- cL'`> a) c� a>p ) "O- O > a u a>oacr = >EC .0—o co OO S E (n aN aO= U E C O a) O CC a) co cn —E Cn X a) a co a _8 a) E Cr � 0 U C�cn cm in N �� O M U 4- -a CC I= cc CD 00 ? rn to a CL ca ~ N C") = Q r— 0 w _ d) c .- � rno c O N Cn(na co N0 O M°� d O Q _ O c O O(f) L- V L- a) �V 0) CL 0) r- > > rn Q< a) N Q M v N ^ C N C CD 3 0- N_) 0U~ C7Nw F~—U HU � K1 003 U ti > p a a 0 N r- �- U a c a U .2 W a) �� O 0 4' C 0 O 1;: c�0 U cu ;� (1) o a� p o C) C O c�0 U Q m > O > C_ a QC �Q 1 00 LA � U r Qa (D > O > C1 a Q� �Q 00 Lo V- r- U .- Qa 00 N� N r- N U CV Qa 0 00 N� -- CN N U r Qa a) > O C_ Q ' 000 CN � CV M N ` U r- N QCv Q a) O N c0 >% c W a) m c a) rn c a) C- a) a) C- L[) c0 oo 0 c O _ -0 m +- c +=' a) C7 a. = a) > > O O O i N (� CO +J w O c0 ' a L N c0 U p f0 cc >• '� c O O > J O C2 Q U c0 J c0 > C O c�0 � C L a) CL C c0 L- C C O c�0 W O 'p O .� cC0 E ) N a) O C.) Lc c0 a Co O p) a) c -Neo L 0 0r N E a V) �m � +J sO r- c C-C a) � + m �'c o) p ++ d U 0 0 0 C H O O a) O a O N O C 'C a .c I O E a) ca a "p M c o o >- L- +� a) O ++ w a) C) > 3 O C a cn a) > M N m c c0 p c c0 a) a c� a) > C t -p Q C O _p _� E c c0 _ Q C 7 _� Q Q 'a O O c cu M C c0 -a a) >, C a to -a C c0 p v�i c a) N L, W 4� C � O cn C p a) "a a c0 c0 a N v C L � O ,� O O rn L O 0 Mco > c aa) a) 7 CC N coc0O *O+ O � � 0 , > a) >a O > cO C O > N "a !E +,N U !E p 0 O O c mLO C n C n C (1) 'a M c- c0 = F- Cf) C0 +_ C OccC- c0 M c Vo7 c M M � LC .� C 0.O 0 0 Cc00 a o 0 a -C p Oa O O `. p O� Z+O a U a o p > E _ c0 C) ca *' *' U �' ca *' U +, � O` aO p y O J W a) = -a O c0 O a) a) O a) a) a) `+- a) N J ) C O CT U) a) CT E O .a � O a o] L CL c0 � 0. a a a) c0 a j N t a -C a) a) cr cc O O a C p O CC Ca U a) "O o: a C- a �' �' C- Qom' a) or C1 ac w cn a) orCO = U) +-C a) O oc C-0 c W am Q U +; J` O En j > O i 00 ma o U) o o a) o ,� 00 M'� E (n a) N N (n V- U d o N L Cn U) r a C; N c0 Z F " a) a. Ln a) Cfl CO Cfl N CD (3 J Y C m CO CO .�, CO ' o r Co LO c0 00 L CO 0 co c co O i CY) a) a) C C) coEN a) 06 r(-D C M M E a) N CA c0 a 00 0 cn C7 0 q-oE a Q. Q 0 cn 00 cn U 0 cn 0 cn F— Nt O O � M a O 00 O M U M Q CL O o �- U N C C O coo � 2 Q CC Q 2 0) a) a) +, C co -a C Vj -0 cCC d cu O 2 ".-CL o O Q 4 O co O E C U) U C C Cc0 U M CO -p C ►-- _ O 0 N C N E U M N M C 'a) -0O w- y O U Q C C O 'Q O O N. O � y ca U a) a) a) U y 'D 'co 0 p O -0 C U 1 C p -j CO -a CL -C N a) 4- CA m M m++o C co 0 d O y— U o U ° ttom — a� N O > v +� co > CL j O U) 7 L- Q a) CL-O t Q a " C a) CC .� Q C C Q m O .E Q O O Q U 0 5 co O n- c0 O w O 0 O E N co O d7 co O co d co (j O N 00 00 � N N N C CL H H U tn 3.30 a 005 O IL W Q L� r U W I O cc a J Q W CL 0 o O 0 O 0 0 0 :: a p O N O O O O ^ M n dU 3 d O co m O CO N N to N n O M G1 m y a E0 �° 3Q -00, OR 3E cQ c V O r O qt d' O t0 N N O pp O M O O OR 4) °' c o E£ o of off° o o 0 0 t9 O 0)O M O O O U v�i a 0 C y O O 0 O 0 O It O O or- E M N d O aai coO n 0 M CD N O J LV L � MM�• 11 N w y s d V O J t a C N Y. L a0 "' a (D c oCL b. a c E •o o, c c m a ep O C L o W v C 0 i V ° c a m 0 c o a a o 2 ao s tm c r- t cco a v O E a Q m _ M O O 0 O O) 0 O d c G1 aci m m m m a CD 0 m s V• Q W W W N 0 a W d co U o ma Y U A? m N d a o O Z ti c y -W O ++ O +° c O c O L L� 1- U C O. C. •� C ,� aC- U E E oC a U a O U 331. a nos DEPARTMENT REPORT: &'A � 02Ti4444" v S FcF OF TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Marni Kunsman, Recreation Supervisov, 0_ VIA: Dodie Horvitz, Community Services Directo DATE: February 15, 2000 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Community Services Department Report for the Month of January 2000 UPCOMING EVENTS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O00: March 2 *Stroke Screening March 4 Neighborhood Pet Show, Fritz Burns Park March 4 Golf, The Simple Truth, Golf Lessons, La Quinta Golf Ranch March 6 Beginning Computer Classes, Session II, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club March 8 Start Your Own Internet Business, Evening Seminar, La Quinta Senior Center March 8 Fun Art for Everyone, Session II, Fritz Burns Park Recreation Room March 8 Intermediate Computers, Session II, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club March 9 *"Fraud Prevention" Seminar March 9 *Healthy Cooking Class March 10 *Scrapbook Workshop March 11 Introduction to Chinese Tea, Cultural History & Tasting, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club March 11 Mastering Microsoft Word, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club March 15 *"Life Review" Seminar March 16 *St. Patrick's Day, Monthly Luncheon March 18 Beginning Microsoft Excel, Computer Seminar, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club March 20 *Free Legal Consultation March 21 Acupuncture, Traditional Chinese Medicine, La Quinta Senior Center March 21 *Free Hearing Consultation & Hearing Aid Check March 23 *Second Annual Putting Tournament, two-day Tournament March 22 Start Your Own Internet Business, Evening Seminar, La Quinta Senior Center March 23 Culture in the Courtyard, Civic Center March 27 *Mature Driver's Course March 27 Low Impact Aerobics Classes, Session II, La Quinta High School March 30 *"What's That Ringing in My Ears?", Seminar March 30 *"Gold Country" Musical Play 332 * Senior Center Program, Class or Event Tit,, 4 4 Q" Community Services Department Attendance Report for the Month of January 2000 Summary Sheet Program 2000 1999 Variance Meetings Per Month 2000 1999 Leisure Classes 265 87 178 20 9 Special Events 15 10 5 1 1 Adult Sports 380 734 -354 11 10 Senior Center 2464 2162 302 145 110 Program Totals 3124 2993 131 177 130 Information/Referrals Senior Center 1034 899 135 17 15 Total 1034 899 135 17 15 Sports Complex Use AYSO 1100 600 500 16 10 Total 1100 600 500 16 10 Total Programs Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1 787 778 9 Meals on Wheels 47 58 -11 Total Volunteer Hours 834 836 -2 Monthly Revenue Senior Center $14,228.00 $ 6,705.75 $ 7,522.25 Community Services $ 9,541.60 $ 6,715.00 $ 2,826.60 Rental Income $ 1,305.00 $ 1,208.00 $ 97.00 Total Revenue $ 25,074.60 $14,628.75 $10,445.85 Revenue Year to Date Senior Center $44,164.00 $25,053.41 $19,110.59 Community Services $37,303.70 $28,769.00 $8,534.70 Rental Income $5,340.00 $10,963.00 -$5,623.00 Total Revenue to Date $86,807.70 $64,785.41 $22,022.29 333 002 Community Services Program Report for January 2000 2000 2000 1999 1999 9nnn 1000 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Low Impact Aerobics 16 64 11 11 53 4 1 Beg. Computers Mon. 10 20 9 18 2 2 2 Beg. Computers Tues. 10 20 10 20 0 2 2 Beg. Computers Wed. 10 20 10 20 0 2 2 Beg. Computers Th. 10 20 0 0 20 2 0 French Conversation 28 56 0 0 56 2 0 Mastering Excel 10 10 0 0 10 1 0 Mastering Word 9 9 0 0 9 1 0 Beg. Ballroom Dance 13 26 8 18 8 2 2 Int. Ballroom Dance 10 20 0 0 20 2 0 Totals 126 265 48 87 178 20 9 2000 2000 1999 1999 2000 1999 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Special Events Culture in the Courtyard 15 15 10 10 5 1 1 Totals 15 15 10 10 5 1 1 2000 2000 1999 1999 2000 1999 Participants Total Participation Participants Total Participation Variance Meetings Meetings Adult Sports Open Basketball M/T 60 60 14 14 46 8 6 Adult Soccer League 80 320 180 720 -400 3 4 Totals 140 380 194 734 -354 11 10 33.1 001 Senior Center Attendance 2000 2000 1999 1999 e istered Total a aster Total Meetings Participants artici Participants arUcipation Variance 2000 1999 Senior Activities Ballroom Dance 11 11 0 0 11 1 0 Bridge, ACBL 266 266 319 319 -53 4 4 Bridge, Duplicate/Social 531 531 434 434 97 121 10 Creative/Reminisce Writing Clubs 29 29 45 45 -16 8 4 Golden Tones 92 92 55 55 37 7 4 Ice Cream Social 14 14 26 26 -12 2 2 Monthly Birthday Party 42 42 30 30 12 1 1 Monthly Luncheon 98 98 97 97 1 1 1 Movie Time 61 61 29 29 32 8 4 Putting Contest 7 7 0 0 7 1 0 Seminars 62 62 64 64 -2 4 4 Television Viewing 46 46 40 40 6 n/a n/a Tennis 192 192 47 47 145 12 4 Tennis Social 17 17 7 7 10 1 1 Senior Activity Total 1468 1468 1193 1193 275 62 39 Senior Leisure Courses Ballroom Dance 14 29 21 83 -54 3 4 Ceramics 13 36 10 40 -4 3 4 Computer 98 142 68 90 52 19 19 Dog Training 3 3 0 0 3 1 0 Exercise 63 432 62 306 126 16 15 Spanish Lessons 20 55 41 119 -64 4 3 Senior Leisure Courses Total 211 697 202 638 59 46 45 Senior Leisure Classes Arts and Crafts 18 18 26 26 -8 4 4 Bridge Lessons 107 107 198 198 -91 6 9 Computer Tutor 19 19 9 9 10 7 2 Golf Clinic 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 Painting 35 35 28 28 7 4 4 Quilting 45 45 0 0 45 4 0 Tai Chi 22 22 0 0 22 4 0 Tap Dance 34 34 24 24 10 5 3 Yoga 17 17 46 46 -29 2 4 Senior Leisure Classes Total 299 299 331 331 -32 37 26 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 1978 2464 1726 2162 302 145 110 Senior Services A.A.R.P. "55 Alive" 52 52 42 42 10 2 2 Ambassadors 93 93 83 83 10 n/a n/a Blood Pressure Check 43 43 59 59 -16 4 4 Bono's Mobile Office 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 FIND Food Distribution 440 440 372 372 68 4 4 Hearing Consultation 18 18 5 5 13 2 1 Information/Referral/Outreach 309 309 277 277 32 n/a n/a Legal Consultation 13 13 4 4 9 2 1 Lifeline Stroke Screening 42 42 42 42 0 1 1 Medicare Consultation 20 20 5 5 15 n/a n/a Share Meetings/Sign-up 3 3 10 10 -7 1 2 TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 1034 1034 899 899 135 17 15 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 30121 3498 2625 3061 437 162 1 Page :3JZ) VV4 La�(�,LTQ o DEPARTMENT REPORT: (-6 5 G�h1 OF 954 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY C UNCIL FROM: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTO DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2000 SUBJECT: YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP At the November 16, 1999 City Council meeting, a discussion occurred regarding the possibility of a Youth Community Services Group whereby young people in La Quinta could provide community service and receive a modest compensation, as outlined in Attachment 1. Staff has researched the existing programs available to the youth in La Quinta as well as throughout the Coachella Valley. This information is provided as Attachment 2. The various Coachella Valley and Inland Empire programs are available to all youth of the community. The City of La Quinta also offers youth community service and work experience opportunities. The Community Services Department participates in Job Fairs at La Quinta High School and other community events such as Y.E.M.P. (Youth Education Motivational Program). The Recreation Aide position, offered by the Community Services Department, requires a willingness to work and basic skills such as record keeping and mathematic skills. The Community Services Department currently employs five high school students as Recreation Aides, at a rate of $6.00 per hour, and they work an average of 10 hours per week. When the Community Services Department has a need for Recreation Aides, a recruitment is conducted at La Quinta High School and through the Desert Sun classified ads. For assistance at special events, staff recruits volunteers from La Quinta High School. When the student requests, staff will provide a letter of recognition, to be used as a reference with a job application. Volunteers are often recruited for the Recreation Aide positions. Staff is not aware of a grant program that is available to local agencies to offer a Youth Community Service Program. Attachments: 1. City Council Minutes dated November 16, 1999 2. Youth Job Training Opportunities Memorandum dated January 26, 2000 SACommunity Services\CCReports\YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICE GROUP.wpd 336 ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Minutes 9 November 16, 1999 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING A YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICE GROUP. Council Member Sniff noted that there are few jobs available for teenagers in the City, and wished to see a La Quinta Youth Community Service Group formed for high school -age students to do community service work for a modest compensation. He suggested a shirt and cap that would identify them with the program. Mayor Pena advised that the County already has substantial funding in place for those types of employment opportunities through the Workforce Development Program. Council Member Sniff wished to have staff look into the possibility of producing a La Quinta-oriented program. Council Member Perkins agreed with looking into it, and noted that there might be grants available for it. 4. DISCUSSION REGARDING A RACETRACK AROUND THE TENNIS COMPLEX. Council Member Adolph advised that he recently heard a conversation about a racetrack being put around the tennis complex for car racing, and was concerned about the noise factor should such activity take place. Council Member Henderson felt that any such activity would not take place without some notice. Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council reconvened and recessed to and ,until 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT Carter Childs spoke about the recent increase in dog license fees for unaltered dogs. He felt $75 would be hard for some families to pay, and asked Council to rethink the issue. 337 003 ATTACHMENT 2 Q" MEMORANDUM TO: DODIE HORVITZ, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR FROM: MARNI KUNSMAN, RECREATION SUPERVISORy� DATE: JANUARY 26, 2000 SUBJECT: YOUTH JOB TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES The following is job training, education and placement opportunities located within the Coachella Valley and the Inland Empire. INLAND EMPIRE JOB TRAINING CORPS The Job Corps, which is federally funded, falls under the Department of Labor and is an all- inclusive approach to training young people in skills required to get and keep a job. The Job Corps offers vocational training, GED, High School Diplomacy and College Training. Participants have the opportunity to commute to employment locations or they can live on the San Bernardino campus in a dorm where meals, medical and dental care, allowances, job placement, and even child care is provided. The approach for this agency is an aggressive training for those who choose to make a life altering decision. At the Job Corps there are many rules which include no drugs, alcohol, violence or gang activity while participating in the program. The only eligibility for participation is to be between the ages of 16-24, be from a low income environment, come from an area that has conditions that keep individuals from getting an education or a job, and be able to benefit and complete the training which one can obtain from the Job Corps center. The center provides the following vocational trades: Building & Apartment Maintenance, Landscaping, Electrical, Clerical, Optical, Certified Nurses Aid, Tile Setting, Surveying, Welding, Carpentry and Culinary Services. REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM The Riverside County Regional Occupational Program (ROP), offers career preparation training to high school students who are residents of Riverside County. ROP offers training in over 40 career areas based upon current and future labor market demands and availability of state funds. Programs are limited to training in those occupations where there is a reasonable expectation of employment and where there is sufficient student interest and need. 333 004 ROP classes are open to students 16 years of age and older. Priority is given to high school seniors and then juniors, followed by persons 16 years of age or older. ROP has no tuition fee. Instruction through ROP does not guarantee job placement. However, the job placement level is high. The Regional Occupational Program is presently offering a summer program for Coachella Valley residents. Summer job opportunities are for youth 14-21 years of age. The program includes paid work experience, on the job training and job placement assistance. Participants for this program must be economically disadvantaged. RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY & THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD The Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Economic Development Agency (EDA) and Workforce Development Board (WDB) have partnered with other governmental and community - oriented agencies and private enterprise to develop and implement an innovative Workforce Development System. Three Workforce Development Centers opened in Riverside, Indio and Palm Springs. Soon to come are more centers throughout the county. These centers are a local answer to a national call for developing a comprehensive Workforce system. The U.S. Department of Labor has been awarded $4.45 million in Welfare to Work competitive grant funds to the program. The EDA and WDB also received $1.5 million in State of California One -Stop grant funds to further the scope of services offered through the Riverside County Workforce Development system. The following is a list of youth employment opportunities provided by the EDA and WDB: Youth Programs: Over 780 youth served between the ages of 16-21, countywide. The purpose is to provide permanent, unsubsidized jobs working a minimum of 20 hours per week. Summer Youth Employment and Training Program: The Hire -A -Youth Program serves western Riverside County and Operation Teamwork serves the eastern county. More than 650 young people were placed in their first jobs by working with many agencies. Learn & Earn Program: A new program recently implemented, provides positive work experiences for at -risk youth. Youth ages 16 and older are placed into non-traditional jobs with an adult mentor involved. Legislative Intern Program: This program provides the placement of low and moderate income college students into internships working with the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and Youth Commission. 331 005 School -to -Career Program: This is a national movement to enhance the education system by emphasizing the link between education and career. A coordinator has been recently hired at the Workforce Development Center in Riverside to begin this program. The Riverside County Office of Education chose to fund this position for the Economic Development Agency due to the successful interaction with local businesses. DESERT SAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (La Quinta High School) Career curriculum and job training is required to be provided throughout district schools. The La Quinta High School participates in the following job training, career educating related activities. Arts Communication & Technology Pathway: This program is for those students interested in a career or educational opportunities in the Fine Arts, Writing, or Computer Arts and Imaging. Pathway teachers in this field will teach a variety of art classes aimed at enhancing the students' cultural appreciation to studio art skills. The student's Senior Year will include a portfolio of works, and performance -based work. Upon competition of all requirements students, will receive a Certificate of Achievement. Internships with community organizations and businesses are coordinated and encouraged. In order for students to get started, they must select a Teacher as an Advisor, outline a four-year plan, apply to the Pathway program and enroll in the "Passport to Culture" class during Intercession. Culinary Institute: The La Quinta High School has developed a Professional Food Service Program. This institute is composed of food courses, a professional food course, an Internship and several general classes designed to enhance the student's knowledge. Students interested in high paying careers in the culinary field, should consider the Institute in their educational plans. The Internships provided are in a professional kitchen such as the Marriot or Hyatt. For students to get started they need to consult a counselor to make arrangements for the courses. Educational Pathway: This is designed for students interested in a career in education. This program will be monitored for successful competition of high school and admission into college. College tours and opportunities to tutor for pay will be available, as well as Internships where students will learn more about becoming a teacher. Students will receive important scholarship information to help with the cost of college as students obtain a degree or teaching credential. Students are required to sign up with a counselor and then they will be contacted regularly for trips, guest speakers and tutoring/Internship opportunities. Health Career Academy: This program is presently unfunded and follows the California Partnership Academy Model: A Technical course integrated with three Academy courses. The Academy is a grade 10 program consisting of an introduction to Health Science, Academy English II, Academy Human Biology and Academy Algebra. 344 006 Students enrolled complete their 6 period day with classes "outside" the Academy such as P.E. and Driver Education/Health. The Academy will offer Internships at local Medical Facilities as well as grade 12 academic subjects within the Academy. The Academy's foundation is it's business partnerships with local medical establishments who work with staff and students to create a highly affective Academy Program. These include: Dr. Steele, JFK Memorial Hospital, Desert Cardiology, Desert Orthopedic Center and the College of the Desert. Students interested in applying should obtain a counselor and apply. Public Service Academy: In accordance with local businesses and community partners, this Public Service Academy has been established for La Quinta High School students grade 10-12. The program will focus on Police, Fire and Court Services training and instruction. As with all California Partnership Academies, the program's technical courses will be combined with academic courses to form a three-year sequence of classes for Academy students. Students interested in a career in Public Services should consider enrolling in the academy and contact a counselor for guidance. CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS The California Conservation Corps (CCC) has recruitment centers throughout California. The center serving our population is located in San Bernardino. To join, participants must be 18-23 years of age, not on probation or parole, willing to work hard and must be a California resident. The CCC hires year -around full time employees to work 40 hours per week. There are residential locations for work, as well as nonresidential facilities. All employment opportunities are in the areas of Natural Resource projects. Some participants may be called upon to fight fires or floods. The CCC is a one year open entry, open exit program. The CCC also provides education so participants can obtain their GED or high school diploma if they do not currently have one. 341 007 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 11- A T-itif 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: February 15, 2000 CONSENT CALENDAR: Transmittal of Revenue and Expenditure Reports dated December 31, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Transmittal of the December 31, 1999 Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta. Respectfully subm John M. Falcon4, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese City Manager Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report, December 31, 1999 342 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 07/01/1999-12/3111999 REMAINING % REVENUE SUMMARY BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED PROJECT AREA NO. 1: DEBT SERVICE FUND: Tax Increment 10,532,422.00 739,222.69 9,793,199.31 7.02% Allocated Interest 0.00 14,704.12 (14,704.12) N/A Non Allocated Interest 0.00 223,022.11 (223,022.11) N/A Interest Advance Proceeds 358,636.00 179,316.00 179,320.00 50.00% Transfers In 1,739,297.00 1,109,185.69 630,111.31 63.77% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 12,630,355.00 2,265,450.61 10,364,904.39 17.94% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Litigation Settlement Revenue Loan Proceeds Transfers In TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: Tax Increment Allocated Interest Miscellaneous revenue Non Allocated Interest LQRP-Rent Revenue Home Sales Proceeds Sewer Subsidy Reimbursements Rehabiliatation Loan repayments Transfer In TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND: Allocated Interest Home Sale Proceeds Non Allocated Interest Transfer In TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 0.00 5,540.97 (5,540.97) N/A 125,000.00 (41,015.59) 166,015.59 -32.81 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 981,937.00 0.00 981,937.00 0.00% 1,106,937.00 (35,474.62) 1,142,411.62 1.05% 2,633,106.00 184,805.67 2,448,300.33 7.02% 200,000.00 24,807.42 175,192.58 12.40% 0.00 179.99 (179.99) N/A 0.00 174,125.25 (174,125.25) N/A 341,000.00 225,422.32 115,577.68 66.11 % 150,000.00 266,266.27 (116,266.27) 177.51% 0.00 32,476.77 (32,476.77) N/A 0.00 314.40 (314.40) N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 3,324,106.00 908,398.09 2,415,707.91 27.33% 0.00 (71,920.52) 71,920.52 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 (71,920.52) 71,920.52 N/A 343 0OR LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROJECT AREA NO, 1: DEBT SERVICE FUND: SERVICES BOND PRINCIPAL BONDINTEREST INTEREST CITY ADVANCE INTEREST - ERAFLOAN PASS THROUGH PAYMENTS TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: PERSONNEL SERVICES LAND ACQUISITION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: PERSONNEL SERVICES ASSESSMENT SUBSIDY PROGRAM LQ RENTAL PROGRAM LQ HOUSING PROGRAM BUILDING HORIZONS REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX 07/01/1999-12131/1999 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED 221,000.00 10,249.00 0.00 210,751.00 4.64% 1,352,660.00 1,352,660.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 3,345,284.00 1,688,708.79 0.00 1,656,575.21 50.48% 358,636.00 179,316.00 0.00 179,320.00 50.00% 0.00 174,095.98 0.00 (174,095.98) N/A 6,084,577.00 602,433.60 0.00 5,482,143.40 9.90% 981,937.00 0.00 0.00 981,937.00 0.00% 12,344,094.00 4,007,463.37 0.00 8,336,630.63 32.46% 8,950.00 4,148.46 0.00 4,801.54 46.35% 169,409.00 30,935.52 0.00 138,473.48 18.26% 85,000.00 70,740.00 0.00 14,260.00 83.22% 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00% 594,619.00 298,991.58 0.00 295,627.42 50.28% 3,903,987.36 456,872.12 0.00 3,447,115.24 11.70% 4,801,965.36 861,687.68 0.00 3,940,277.68 17.94% 3,900.00 1,815.08 0.00 2,084.92 46.54% 169,451.00 41,827.87 0.00 127,623.13 24.68% 253,000 120,734.34 0.00 132,265.66 47.72% 125,000 185,118.82 0.00 (60,118.82) 148.10% 1,011,151 756,388.09 0.00 254,762.91 74.80% 210,000 172,700.00 0.00 37,300.00 82.24% 258,954.00 131,799.51 0.00 127,154.49 50.90% 1,739,297.00 1,109,185.69 0.00 630,111.31 63.77% 3,770,753.00 2,519,569.40 0.00 1,251,183.60 66.82% LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND PERSONNEL 5,700.00 2,334.75 0.00 3,365.25 40.96% SERVICES 57,401.00 14,774.40 0.00 42,626.60 25.74% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A HOUSING PROJECTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TRANSFERS OUT 3,230,884.13 525,922.36 0.00 2,704,961.77 16.28% TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 3,293,985.13 543,031.51 0.00 2,750,953.62 16.49% 344 nn4 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE SUMMARY PROJECT AREA NO, 2: DEBT SERVICE FUND: Tax Increment Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Interest Advance Proceeds Transfer in TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Developer Agreement Transfers In Proceeds from City Loan TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: Tax Increment Developer funding Allocated Interest Transfer in TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND: Allocated Interest Non Allocated Interest Transfer in TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 07/01/1999-12/31/1999 REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 4,247,033.00 239,416.55 4,007,616.45 5.64% 0.00 4,122.00 (4,122.00) N/A 0.00 157.36 (157.36) N/A 435,712.00 217,854.00 217,858.00 50.00% 338,841.00 206,377.50 132,463.50 60.91 % 5,021,586.00 667,927.41 4,353,658.59 13.30% 20,000.00 10,822.02 9,177.98 54.11% 0.00 14,250.44 (14,250.44) N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 190,425.00 0.00 190,425.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 210,425.00 25,072.46 185,352.54 11.92% 1,061,758.00 59,854.14 1,001,903.86 5.64% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 20,700.00 38,441.22 (17,741.22) 185.71% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 1,082,458.00 98,295.36 984,162.64 9.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 (19,200.14) 19,200.14 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 (19,200.14) 19,200.14 N/A r 34y n05 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXPENDITURE SUMMARY PROJECT AREA NO, 2: DEBT SERVICE FUND: SERVICES BOND PRINCIPAL BONDINTEREST INTEREST CITY ADVANCE INTEREST - ERAFLOAN PASS THROUGH PAYMENTS TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL DEBT SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: 07/01/1999 - 12/31/1999 REMAINING % BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENDED 74,350.00 4,675.00 0.00 69,675.00 6.29% 152,340.00 152,340.00 0.00 0.00 100.00% 607,009.00 305,041.21 0.00 301,967.79 50.25% 539,878.00 217,854.00 0.00 322,024.00 40.35% 0.00 15,931.88 0.00 (15,931.88) N/A 3,472,320.00 77,204.38 0.00 3,395,115.62 2.22% 190,425.00 0.00 0.00 190,425.00 0.00% 5,036,322.00 773,046.47 0.00 4,263,275.53 15.35% PERSONNEL 5,300.00 2,432.83 0.00 2,867.17 45.90% SERVICES 124,426.00 19,929.13 0.00 104,496.87 16.02% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 128,000.00 2,500.00 0.00 125,500.00 1.95% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 174,307.00 89,935.58 0.00 84,371.42 51.60% TRANSFERS OUT 1,773,004.22 128,183.64 0.00 1,644,820.58 7.23% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 2,205,037.22 242,981.18 0.00 1,962,056.04 11.02% LOW/MODERATE TAX FUND: PERSONNEL 3,300.00 1,419.52 0.00 1,880.48 43.02% SERVICES 449,674.00 11,471.85 0.00 438,202.15 2.55% LQ HOUSING PROGRAM 536,000.00 3,700.00 0.00 532,300.00 0.69% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 364,346.00 175,382.16 0.00 188,963.84 48.14% TRANSFERS. OUT 1,481,053.00 206,377.50 0.00 1,274,675.50 13.93% TOTAL LOW/MOD TAX 2,834,373.00 398,351.03 0.00 2,436,021.97 14.05% LOW/MODERATE BOND FUND PERSONNEL 2,600.00 1,012.31 0.00 1,587.69 38.93% SERVICES 47,774.00 10,315.12 0.00 37,458.88 21.59% REIMBURSEMENT TO GEN FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A TRANSFERS OUT 1,881,526.17 (433,552.49) 0.00 2,315,078.66 -23.04% TOTAL LOW/MOD BOND 1,931,900.17 (422,225.06) 0.00 2,354,125.23 -21.86% onF �..01 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 6- A � oz v 5 y�CFM OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Chris A. Vogt, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: February 15, 2000 RE: Public Works/Engineering Department Report for the Month of January 2000 Attached please find the following: 1. Summary of Citizen Request reports received; 2. Summary of Graffiti reports received; 3. Plan Check Applications received; 4. Encroachment Permits received; 5. List of Capital Improvement Project status; 6. Maintenance Report. Chris A. Vogt Public Works Director/City Engineer 347 T:\PWDEPT\COUNCIL\2000\0002Dept.wpd 0 0 0 0 U) L11 �•y LU V w Z W N H U W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W F- F- !- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F-- F- F- F- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMMMM(OI�I�MONra•NMLO�OOrOe-r �/y;00000000���\���N \NNN N E, 000 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 000 p 0 0 0 Q O 0 Q 0 p 0 0 0 Q p 0 0 Q O coo off d3 oZf o� � dS a� � aZf o�j o�S o�S oiS o� o2i dS d3 o�S dS off o� o�J F- F- F- F- 2 F- F- F- F- F- F•- 2 F- F- N v c c cm N ISD ++ O V Y W C (D CO C ++ N O '° N 7 O W Z O E (0 (0 Y U•CU L CD 0 cc O C y a @) O 4-- i +� adf L O 0 p U a_ +- 0)° O 7 Y O m e `p !Z C O >, CD c U` U � O L c0 c_ C +J +`+ +' O O) C) y N � C O +O y h +`, h N E cO L +1 L Z .r, fn y CP 41 \ c0 O) c O W C= W z i O O? 3 C ++ y L O O L� 7 0 N 0 U V d c .0 ._ y m O �- L o� f, O x c o O c +-� c o o a� CO s 0 rn@ a N Y _O O) L d O a) N m 0 v� a y C E co O CaJ C > C V Ln c0 — O -p c >. ° C r C O +� C cc L� E C ° rnm > a'�Q`n 0 0) cLoa B O' Q°°o__`m-o co y j cu c� 00) Y a+ co E 0 O a m N +� y cm c 0 m •` fC E0 C 0 N C cn E m C V y cm c c 1 c p U) m m c coo O 3 0 N y u- Q O +,,, y N O" C L O) � cn C ,•. O E y O m In E O L E cn m O_ > N> y O m to CM c y L@> c0 > U C y co c0 a� +, L c 0 LA E O Q .E Q � Q Q c0 0. CU 0 0 m0 y f/1 a� N @Z�m>>mVmozS m N �0 Q n `G ca�o2f O W C �+'aL y ✓� "�� > cc_) Q C ° U "O c Z> .: W c c 7 a C6 C Q Q M w +O G c C E ova o @ (D df ° o � E � co 0 o � ° 0 t ° 5 rn (moo ° � ° °� c ° r c O C c r- v= v- _C V >� L N 0 L 0 •+•, c V y -. , L m •- L E E to y M -a O 0 to >� c0 > +� � W ++ a M a M CO m O ++ c0 m �:2 ,F-0 c°n2�d0W03:U') F-2iQ UOOWU C m CO 0) O a)U p 0 U y N v° c cO y >' cop> m c O N O f0 N C p e V j L c C Z c N O 6 c cc Q C N c N N O M c0 O > L > C > L i C C U Y O co ++ i p M m h i ++ i 0) @ -CU Q c c0 L M m L m m m F- > L F- ,,. cO c0 c0 c0 O O c0 m c0 0 7 7 7 f0 f0 O f0 @ (0 W C C c c CO c c C c u, y y c cm c ycm 0) c C tm c O N O a0, N N 2 N 0 0 .° N d L '00 0 co N N l9 L L L L O L L L L L L +1 L L L \N \N \(D \N \� \O \N `N \N \� `@ \� `O \N \@ \N \O \O `N LL 1= cc cc u LL ' LL ILL —) cr IL cc cc cc LL 0000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M r- N N O r r r N M Ct d' M M O r r " O 00000000 r r r r r r r r r r N N N O O O O 010 010 01010 010101010 0101010 O O O r N M ct Ln q* M W N N M O r N M r M M It Ln 00 t It d' lid, O 0't It et It w w m w 0 O m w It 0 0 co Ict It Ict LO et d' � It d' LO LO w It It N 0 It W It I'd, It N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N gu G 001. a; c 0 t a a� d H II J W H ai c I a E 0 U d 0 U II W O O U E .o c �E v Q II Q c a, E a 0 a> 0 F 0 a O 0 0 M 0 CL LU LL. Ll. a cr 0 000000000000 000000000000 O LO, O Lc; 0 0 0 Lti LA 0 0 L6 LO O LO m M I- LO o0 0 ltN 0 000000000000 000000000000 000LO0000000 Ln NCOCN N[FN-t(OM'R M v> 4Y 4> 4? 4> 4) 4Y 4Y 4} 4> 4Y N 00000000000 0 ,0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 LO00000(OLO00CD 4} �;p11 i > 4Y 4} 4). N N 4} 4Y 4} 4) 4> x c O c m L C E 0 c U c 0 L = y 0 co U 0 C' 0 y U0 0 +O+ +0+ U .� O 00 >� N Q Z cn O 0 0 0 0 0 O N co O O U c6 CL co O °0 3 y�U)m y'aNci� a > co >' 0 m a U 0 c co fo y 0 C 0 6 2 3: i I 111 21 ICILLI 0 U E a a co o E o `: U co H a. O E.y �OiLa`.. co 0 0 a, E O LD c m rn w co (noQQinr,'mM oQ (DN00a)Nqe0LOMtt N N N N M (O M M 0 M M MMMMM00MM00MM N N N N N N N N N 00000000000 00000000000 00000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N MMLOLONMMM00�� 0000NN 00000000000 34 UO3 O O O N C W W U W N Z O H Q U J a a Q Y U w 2 U Z Q J a 3�0 GU4 0 O M F- cr w p_ F- Z w 2 U Q O U Z Lu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 (D N Q) 2222-»2�222 O O O O O O O O T T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N LO a— r LA LO Ln r r 00 In Ln �'- M N N M M M T T r r M 0—T00000000 O O O O O 0 CD C O N 00 00 Co CDd' cco L 60) Co U (D Ccm"N 3 U O E a 0 o Z c > t c 3. c v, ° O vi CL a.02 �a o U c• Nap E O _N M c> N v 0 E LO (0—U 3 N N Cq M-0 O N E r ao (DEEO"T~�T'MN L L L O �� N w- = Lo i LL a Q. N U O M O D N 0 .r 7 C- L (�°�a��E_C LnUF c r- c o fA Li co vi > L O LO M+`'. N N N `� ECo mm—m C ya CO y> C co N N a •O O L >>m cacc 0 co i J O O U U rn o w m 4) E E E E E E E E U E c fA y y y N N h N C. N 7 U a� L E = N U J � -Op J Y ca ca N U 00)i M C7 E 0 oLi Co Ci � 0 � m ~ > UUc)UUUXco WU) 'gr LO (D I- 00 O O T N It Lo N N N N N T T T r r T T T T T T M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N CO LO LO T r T N Cf CO LO CO O O O r r T r r T N N T T r T r T r T r r r O O 0000000 O O 351 G0 5 MONTHLY PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY Capital Improvement Projects F/Y 1999/2000 Januaa 2000 Project Name/No. Contract Complete Complete Scheduled Amount last to Date Construction Month Start/Completion City Entrance Monuments 98-05 $257,100 20% 85% August, Feb, 2000 Award 5/18/99 1999 Miles Ave/Washington St. $1,310,649 0% 100% Sept 21, Mar 12, 1999 Imprvmts / 98-07 Award 6/22/99 '98 Washington St. Widening/ Ave 50 $2,428,700 16% 54% Sept, 1999 March, 2000 to Village Ctn. 98-09 Award 6/22/99 Rondo Drainage Channel, 98-11 Eng Est. 0% 0% Mar 2000 Jun 2000 $218,082 Parc La Quinta Electrical Under $126,430 0% 100% Jan 1999 July 1999 grounding 98-14 Various Citywide Street $236,793 1 % 33% Sept 1999 Jan 2000 Improvements, Signals, 98-15 Award 9/7/99 Fritz Burns Park/ Bear Creek Bike $219,807 0% 60% July 1999 July 2000 Path Retrofit/rest stops 98-16 Avenue 50 Pavement $259,783 90% 90% Dec 1999 Feb 2000 Rehabilitation 98-17 Award 10/19/99 Ave 50 Median Landscape 99-01 $210,000 0% 100% July, 1999 Sept, 1999 Award 5/18/99 Jefferson Street Improvements $6,876,876 0% 0% Feb, 2000 Jan, 2001 HWY111 to Ave 54, 99-05 Award 6/29/99 Tampico, Sinaloa & Ave 52 $346,211 0% 0% Jan—2000 2000 March, 2000 35^ T:\PWDEPT\CIPDIV\MPSSMST_REPORT\0001 Mpsmst.wpd Revised 217100 LU6 milli 1111111ll1l11111111111111111111111���11�11 3111�����11111111111111111111111111111111�1���1 9��IIIIIIIII��IIIIIiii�I��11111111111��11111ii�� ��IIIIIIIIIII�ii�I���iii111111111111111��111iiii�� �iiii11�1�11111����1�ii��11111111111111111���ii�� .�II�����IIIIIIIIIIIii'i11111111��1111111111��ii�� �II��I�I��I����IIIIiii111111111111��111111111137 .9�i111111111��I�111iiiii�11111111111111���11iii�� .91111�I�IIIIIII���i�ilii11111111111111111������� r U Q) D) C/) a U) E Lu 75 Z 0 a) 2) E CL -0 0 E E CL 1i51 [>ID 2el (U 0 1 Q w -6 >W. w m :3 0- E C0 (9 a- Q_ CL I I I �5 W. �5 •w Department Report No. g - n POLICE REPORT Inside this issue: 3anuary Significant Activ- ity Report School Resource Officer Reports for December/ 3anuary December Crime Statistics Summery La Quinta Target Team 3anuary Report Special points of interest from the Crime Statistic Summary: • Since year-to-date statistics on Homicides includes at- tempts, the number is mis- leading. In actuality, La Quinta had NO homicides this year — the two listed were attempts. • Good News — All Part One Crimes are down for month AND year-to-date. • Bad News — Vandalism re- mains a number one prob- lem. Reported incidents are up 39% from last year. Thanks to the Traffic Team, DUls are down significantly. Extra kudos are due when you consider statistics in- clude a Y2K holiday season. Also injury T/Cs continue to decline with a 37% decrease over 1998 totals. DEC 1999/7AN 2000 Under the Influence Drivers are Dangerous — 'Inside and Outside Their Vehicles A recent research study per- formed by the International Association of Chiefs of Po- lice (IACP), states that roughly half of all traffic stops that result in use of force, involve subjects who are un- der the influence of either drugs or alcohol. The study indicates that dur- ing incidents using force, offi- cers are injured 4.2% of the time, while suspects are only injured 2.7% of the time. Part of the reason for the high rate of officer injuries may be that officers are gen- erally limited by Department Policy and Procedure to no more force than is reasona- bly necessary in overcom- System described below ing resistance. Your av- has been a great deterrent erage DUI has very few to the otherwise violent limits. The Mobile Video DUI subject La Quinta Police Department Mobile Video System Update Under Public Law 104-208 the City of La Quinta used Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds to purchase three (3) mobile video systems for use in its police units. Those systems were installed in mid-1998 in 3 of the La Quinta units. The vendor pro- vided initial training and following the ap- proval of a protocol for their use, they be- came operational in late 1998. In 1999 the plan of having all La Quinta PD units equipped with the systems took a positive step forward with inclusion in the FY 1999/2000 LLEBG proposal. If approved at the LLEBG public hearing it is antici- pated that the entire La Quinta PD fleet will be operational by the fall of 2000. The video systems are in -car mounted cameras that are either manually activated or auto- matically activated when the units emer- gency lights are activated. The cameras are equipped with most common video fea- tures like zoom, wide angle, etc. They cap- ture audio and video data related to spe- cific incidents. They are an extremely help- ful tool in DUI enforcement and prosecu- tions. 355 LA QUINTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Significant Incidents / Highlights JANUARY, 2000 CALLS FOR SERVICE 01/01(Sat) 53 01/12 (Wed) 43 01/02 (Sun) 36 01/13 (Thu) 63 01/03 (Mon) 32 01/14 (Fri) 57 01/04 (rue) 45 01/15 (Sat) 37 01105 (Wed) 42 01/16 (Sun) 42 01/06 (Thu) 36 01/17 (Mon) 33 01/07 (Fri) 33 01/18 (rue) 44 01/08 (Sat) 35 01/19 (Wed) 34 01/09 (Sun) 29 01/20 (Thu) 42 01/10 (Mon) 36 01/21 (Fri) 39 01/11 (rue) 29 01/22 (Sat) 34 TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE: 874 (Averaging 40 calls per day for the reporting period) (Includes self -initiated activity and citations issued) 1 35f SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY O1/01 Deputies responded to a large volume of "shots fired" calls and illegal fireworks during the early hours of the morning. O1/02 Nothing notable. O1/03 Report of a burglary in the 53-000 block of Ave. Villa. Car stereo stolen from a vehicle. O1/04 A 44 year old female, La Quinta resident arrested for residential burglary in the 52-000 block of Ave. Alvarado. Report of a vehicle burglary in the 44-000 block of Cristol. Victim was sleeping in his RV trailer and was awakened by an unknown suspect who had broken into his truck and stole tools. Non -injury traffic accident at Dune Palms and Fred Waring. Primary collision factor (PCF) of failure to yield the right of way. A 42 year old Palm Desert man was arrested for possession of a loaded firearm at Darby Rd. and Moore Circle. Suspect was a convicted felon. Arrested out of a traffic stop. Non -injury traffic accident at Washington St. and Fred Waring Dr.. PCF of failure to stop for red signal. Deputy Wedertz, La Quinta High School Resource Officer, identified several high school students involved in several crimes of graffiti in/around the high school and La Quinta area. O1/05 An 18 year old Hispanic male was arrested at Ave. Obregon and Calle Monterey for a felony, no -bail theft warrant. O1/06 Nothing notable. O1/07 Nothing notable. O1/08 A 26 year old Indio man was arrested for possession of a loaded firearm at Miles Ave. and Los Manos. The subject was arrested after he followed an unmarked sheriffs unit driven by a female deputy on her way to a surveillance operation, in the city of La Quinta. The suspect followed the deputy and unmarked unit and flashed his lights several times to pull her over. When back-up officers were in position, the suspect was stopped and found to be in possession of the firearm. The suspect explained his actions by saying he thought the deputy was a fiend of his. O1/09 A 53 year old Indio man was arrested for a felony DUI warrant at Ave. 53 and Monroe. O1/10 Members of the "Coachella Valley Narcotic Task Force" (CVNTF) arrested a 28 year old La Quinta resident in the 51-000 block of Ave. Obregon. CVNTF Officers conducted a probation 2 357 search at the suspects residence and seized over a pound of marijuana. 01/11 Nothing notable. 01/12 A 15 year old male juvenile was arrested for possession of stolen property out of a probation search at his residence in the 53-000 block of Ave. Alvarado. 01/13 Report of a commercial burglary at the La Quinta Auto Mall construction site. Several large electrical panels valued at $3000.00 each were stolen. A felony arrest warrant was served in the 51-000 block of Ave. Herrera. A 20 year old La Quinta man was arrested on a theft warrant. Report of an unknown Hispanic male annoying two La Quinta juveniles in the area of Ave. Bermudas and La Fonda. The suspect tried to lure the juveniles to him but they fled. 01/14 Report of Suspicious Circumstances" at La Quinta High School when a partial piece of a human tongue was found in the boys restroom. Area hospitals were checked_ for the victim but no similar injuries were reported. A 16 year old male was arrested at the high school for possession of marijuana. A 25 year old La Quinta female was arrested for a felony warrant for burglary at Victoria and Adams. Unattended death reported in the 51-000 block of Ave. Rubio. A 26 year old La Quinta man was found deceased. No signs of foul play. Further investigation is being done by the Coroner's Office. Minor injury traffic accident at Washington St. and Darby Rd.. Complaint of pain only. PCF of speeding. An 18 year old Indio man was arrested for kidnaping with intent to commit rape. Crime occurred in the 50-000 block of Washington St.. Victim was able to escape from the suspect after he attempted to drag her behind a commercial business complex. Victim was not seriously injured. 01/15 A 31 year old La Quints man was arrested for spousal abuse in the 54-000 block of Ave. Obregon. 01/16 A 19 year old male was arrested for a felony arrest warrant at Adams St. and Fred Waring Dr.. 01/17 Minor injury traffic accident reported in the 54-000 block of Ave. Madero. A 45 year old Palm Springs woman feel asleep while driving and collided with a parked car. PCF of failure to maintain a direct course of travel. A 29 year old La Quinta man was arrested in the 46-000 block of Dune Palms for being a 3 135 "Parolee -at -large", and domestic battery. 01/18 M'uior injury traffic accident in the Plaza La Quinta parking lot. A 67 year old Desert Center resident stepped out from between two parked vehicles and his arm was struck by a passing vehicle. Victim complained of pain after he was knocked to the ground. Report of a hit and run traffic accident in the parking lot of 78-670 Hwy 111. A witness was able to capture the license plate of the fleeing vehicle. Follow-up investigation revealed the suspect/driver who admitted to the accident. He was also arrested for three arrest warrants with bail amounts totaling $400,000.00. 01/19 Report of a possible shoplifting and brandishing of a weapon at 79-900 Hwy 111 (Home Depot). Two males suspected of concealing store property, brandished a knife at a store clerk then fled out of the store and got into a vehicle and drove northbound on Jefferson St.. 01/20 Non -injury traffic accident at Eisenhower and Coachella Dr.. PCF of failure to yield right of way. An 18 year old La Quinta man was arrested for DUI at Eisenhower and Durango. La Quinta Deputies assisted Indio Police in the pursuit and arrest of a vehicle theft suspect in the area of Wes Ave. and Dune Palms Dr.. After fleeing from the stolen vehicle, the suspect was later found and arrested in a house under construction on Horseshoe lane. Report of felony spousal abuse in the 50-700 block of. Washington St.. A 26 year old La Quinta man struck his wife in the face with his fist and fled before the arrival of deputies. Victim suffered a broken nose and was transported to JFK Hospital for treatment. The suspect later turned himself into officers and was arrested. 01/21 Nothing notable. 01/22 Two Nebraska state residents arrested for public intoxication at Eisenhower Dr. and Calle Hildalgo. 4 359 Riverside County Sheriffs Department La Quints Target Team Monthly Report January 2000 The following is a summary of the Target Team activities for the month of December. Ongoing investigations 5 Parole searches 2 Arrests/Filings 4 Consent searches 20 Vehicle stops/checks 26 Meetings 1 Business contacts 15 Recovered stolen property $0 Investigation assists 3 Citations 2 Arrest warrants served 1 Surveillance 2 Arrest warrants attempted 1 Property checks 3 Programs 2 Civil commitments 0 Pedestrian checks 35 Bicycle time 0 hours Crime prevention hours 4 Training hours 0 Bar checks 12 Illegal drugs seized small amount Back-ups 10 of possible methamphetamine oil Follow-ups 4 Search warrants 1 Total Mileage: 772 Probation searches 2 1 360 Arrests and Filings Arrests and Filings: LQ resident arrested for a burglary warrant. Indio resident arrested for felony false imprisonment and (2) counts of felony sexual battery. Indio resident arrested for DUI. Rancho Mirage resident arrested for DUI of drugs. Noteworthy accomplishments: The Target Team assisted with a traffic accident investigation and after a DRE evaluation was conducted, it was determined that the driver was driving under the influence of illegal drugs. The Target Team participated in the La Quinta P.D. Y2K program and assisted patrol with calls for service and traffic problems associated with the New Years Holiday. The Target Team drafted and conducted a surveillance program in reference to the numerous reports of theft, occurring at the new construction sites in the North La Quinta area. No persons were arrested during the program, however, many citizens were contacted and instructed on how they may be able to better protect their property from theft. The Target Team investigated a report of a sexual battery, which was deemed to be a false imprisonment and sexual battery case and is still under investigation in reference to a possibility of a second victim being involved. The suspect is in custody with a $50,000.00 bail set. Additional information: The Target Team will be on vacation from 01/16/00 thru 01/25/00 Prepared on 01/24/00 by: Dep. E. Price 92273 Dep. T Brewster #2297 2 361 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT January 2000* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL Deputy: Stephen Morton RSO Grant Funded Position 9 Reports 6 Arrests 5 Citations 20 Pedestrian Checks 1 DA Filing 1 Traffic Stop HIGHLIGHTS: Five Arrests were for truancy violations and one Arrest for vandalism of school property. I conducted several truancy checks in the City of La Quinta and assisted the Probation Department in conducting a student check. I attended a Student Attendance Review Board (SARB) meeting at the Desert Sands Unified School District Office. I attended several eighth grade classes and spoke to the students about the United States Constitution and the Fourth Amendment. I attended a forty -hour Basic School Resource Officer course presented by Corbin & Associates. *Actual reporting period covers January 3 2000 through January 28, 2000 SROs attend patrol briefings, participate in investigations with juvenile suspects, and attend the numerous school -related committee meetings. Their Knowledge of student activities is invaluable to police efforts in juvenile crime prevention and apprehension. 362 CITY of LA QUINTA MONTHLY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT January 2000* SCHOOL: LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL Deputy: Randall Wedertz City Contract Position 13 Reports 1 Felony Arrest 3 Misdemeanor Reports 5 Citations 4 Traffic Stops 7 Pedestrian Checks 4 DA Filings HIGHLIGHTS: On December 17, 1999, 1 conducted surveillance at the La Quanta High school, with the assistance of Deputy Morton (LAMS SRO), and Desert Sands School District security. We were attempting to apprehend and identify the subjects responsible for the recent vandalism occurring at the high school and area surrounding the high school. No one was identified during this time, but on 1-4-00 1 followed up on a tip I received and identified one of the subjects involved in the recent vandalism occurring on campus. The subject had his graffiti moniker written on notebook paper and a black marker used on and around campus. The subject admitted to the vandalism and the case was submitted for filing with the District Attorney's office. I initiated a probation search on a student enrolled at LQHS, and located stolen property belonging to a La Quinta Middle School student. The student was arrested and booked into Juvenile Hall for possession of stolen property. I issued citations to five high school students for truancy, all students were returned to La Quinta High school. I Received information of a partially severed tongue in the boys restroom. I went to the restroom and located a 2"-3/4" inch tip of a human tongue in the restroom sink. I did not locate any students inside the office reporting an injury to their mouth. checked with all the local hospitals -- no reports of anyone receiving any injuries to their tongues. I was able to follow a blood trail to Westward Ho Dr., in front of the school, at this time this case is still open. DEP. R. WEDERTZ #2346 " Actual reporting period covers December 17, 1999 thru January 14, 2000 363 CITY OF LA QUINTA DECEMBER CRIME COMPARISONS CRIME DECEMBER 99 DECEMBER 98 YTD (99) YTD (98) *HOMICIDE 0 2 2 4 *RAPE 0 3 8 18 SEX CRIMES (FEL) 1 4 19 21 SEX CRIMES (MISD) 1 0 15 18 ROBBERY 1 1 16 14 ASSAULT (FEL) 4 10 95 113 ASSAULT (MISD) 15 18 213 190 BURGLARY 42 34 366 394 *VEHICLE THEFT 10 12 94 100 *THEFT (FEL) 28 11 177 135 THEFT (MISD) 52 32 339 307 VANDALISM (MISD) 28 35 411 295 DOM. VIOLENCE 3 7 108 139 NARCOTICS 13 9 111 67 DUI 3 8 73 107 T/C NON -INJURY 50 13 410 348 T/C INJURY 3 15 43 68 T/C FATAL 0 0 1 0 TRAFFIC CITATIONS 288 211 2975 2953 * STATISTICS INCLUDE ATTEMPTS 365 z w Q z � O W � 0 w� U U LU J � Ory U � W m Q W LLJ 0 Z (3) 00 CF) 0) U C) 0 0 ■ ❑ c LL w F=- h w O O O O O O Lid � M N m J Q Q w co co w LL U W w a. 366 z W � rn N W LL m W a U w LLJ z C) cn o W <ry U o Lli J � U w H Zry o Q 0 W Q J L cM CV - n w x w x x g M m c J a w a 9 367 z w z a o Q�. Q w a o W >- U g Om a W Qm LLI Z w 0) co 0) cr) U U 0 0 In 0 W a� a U Ln o o LO o N N r- r' W J U_ J F- O 0 i J Q U W U Q H Z W N W w 363 z w Z> F- CL w 0 W Nm ' ^ V / W � W V Irl- W m 2 Ld U W Q } m U. W 'n F- co N N r- 3619 z W W U N W LJ� U) Qw O CL u) W J J QLL U w 0 UZ 0 0 CL J � CL 0 U Q � rn zW m w U n( W V � Q J O 00 CF) 0) U U 0 0 ■ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' CO IT N O 00 CO 't N r- T- r- � rn Zw m W � W U W F- r) N W L.L. U Q � W U) W w 0 0 LL U) w J U � J o z � o Q a � o z C) W � o Q ~ J w r U) ca O 01) 0) CO �fi N O 00 C� �t N O r- U J Q 3 71, w m G U 0 F- U Q U LL Q F_ 1 0 z O t,L a. 2 0 U 000 CO Iq N O 00co 00 0d' N r r r r r } X Z U H } Z z 0 z U H Z 0 H CU U U. 9 CITY OF LA QUINTA DISPATCH INFORMATION / DECEMBER 1999 TYPE OF CALL RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES) NUMBER OF INCIDENTS CODE 1: ROUTINE 8 968 CODE 3: EMERGENCY 6 1 3t,3 ` 4 e(AQutHtw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 A Joint Public Hearing Between the City Council and Redevelopment Agency to Approve an Agreement to Sell Real Property Located at 52-690 Avenida Herrera by and between Rosa Montes and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: / Approve an Agreement to sell the property located at 52-690 Avenida Herrera by and between Rosa Montes and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency maintaining an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $85,000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Agreement would result in the following fiscal impacts: Resale Proceeds. The Agency will receive approximately $50,600 in cash proceeds from this transaction generated by the new mortgage loan and down payment less closing costs. A new second trust deed of $29,950 will be placed on the property in favor of the Agency. Property Rehabilitation Costs. None. All property rehabilitation costs have been funded by rent revenue. BACKGROUND: In August, 1995, the Agency acquired 50 single family homes as a result of the bankruptcy of Coachella Valley Land to protect the Agency's investment in the homes, to prevent a pending foreclosure action, and to maintain the units as very low income rental units. The Agency cost to acquire the 50 housing units averaged $86,500 per unit. On February 17, 1998, the Agency authorized the sale of up to two (2) units per year and directed staff to first make the units available to the existing tenants and then to other eligible very low income households. Because many of the tenants are now receiving work training as a requirement of their State and County assistance, their CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh-2CC rpt for property sale.wpd 3-74 economic situation is improving. The proposed sale is the third unit to be sold to an existing tenant. The sale of this property will result in recorded covenants to insure the property will remain affordable to a very low income household for thirty (30) years. Property Resale. The sale transaction would be structured as other Agency affordable housing projects, wherein the existing Agency -funded silent second trust deed would cover the difference between the market sales price and an affordable first trust deed mortgage. The proposed purchaser qualifies in the very low income category. If the Agency authorizes the sale of this unit for the market value of $85,000, the buyer will make a down payment of 3% of the purchase price and obtain a $52,500 mortgage (the maximum loan she can obtain). The Agency would convert $29,950 of its existing equity in the property into a second trust deed loan. Prior to the sale, this unit will have been substantially rehabilitated and therefore, can be counted toward the Agency's inclusionary housing requirement. A Summary Report is attached (Attachment 1) as required by State Law. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Approve an Agreement to sell the property located at 52-690 Avenida Herrera by and between Rosa Montes and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency maintaining an affordable housing unit in Project Area No. 1 for a purchase price of $85,000; or 2. Do not approve an Agreement to sell the property located at 52-690 Avenida Herrera by and between Rosa Montes and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, f Herm9h munity Development Director Attachment: 1 . Summary Report Approved for submission by: l Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 315 UO2, SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ROSA MONTES February 15, 2000 INTRODUCTION This document is the Summary Report ("Report") for a proposed property sale involving the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and Rosa Montes ("Buyer"). The purpose of the Sale Agreement ("Agreement") is to facilitate the sale by the Agency of a single-family dwelling to the Buyer. This Report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code ("California Community Redevelopment Law") and presents the following: • A summary of the proposed transaction. • The cost of the sale to the Agency. • The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed, determined at the highest and best uses permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan. • The estimated value to be conveyed, determined by the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the Agreement. • An explanation of why the sale, pursuant to the Agreement, will assist in the elimination of blight. SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property ("Property") is a 3-bedroom, 2-bath single-family dwelling located at 52-690 Avenida Herrera within La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. THE TRANSACTIONS PROVIDED FOR BY THE AGREEMENT The Agreement will facilitate the sale of the Property to the Buyer, who will subsequently occupy the dwelling. The sales price is $85,000, comprised of approximately $2,550 in the Buyer's down payment, $52,500 from the Buyer's first trust deed mortgage, and $29,950 of the Agency's equity in the Property which will be converted into an affordable housing second trust deed loan. This second trust deed will include covenants to insure that the Property will remain affordable to a very low-income family for a minimum of 30 years. The monies required to fund the Agency's second trust deed were expended in August, 1995, when the Agency purchased this unit in order to secure its investment in an Affordable Housing Agreement with Coachella Valley Land. A portion of these purchase monies will be repaid to the CAMy DocumentsMPDOMSummary report 52-690 Herrera.doc 1 376 v64 Agency through the Buyer's down payment and first trust deed mortgage; the remaining funds will stay in place to fund the Agency's second trust deed mortgage and closing cost contribution. The Agency will receive approximately $50,600 from this transaction. History of Property This Property is currently a part of the Agency's Rental Property Purchase Program. In May, 1998, the Agency offered this Property to the Buyer who subsequently expressed an interest in purchasing the Property. Since that time, the Buyer has been approved by First Pacific Financial for a mortgage up to the amount of $52,500. The Buyer is a very low income household. The Cost of the Sale to the Agency The Agency will have approximately $107,750 invested in the Property through its cost to purchase the unit and to remedy deferred maintenance items which existed at the time of purchase. The sales contract provides for a purchase price of $85,000. Under this proposed transaction, the Agency's investment will be treated as follows: Agency Purchase Price: $86,500 Total Cost to Qualify Unit as Substantially Rehabilitated (funded from rent revenue): 21.250 Total Agency Investment: $107,750 Buyer Down Payment: $2,550 Buyer First Trust Deed Monies Paid to Agency: $52,500 Agency Affordable Housing Second Trust Deed: $29,950 Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Highest and Best Uses Permitted by the Agency's Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project No. 1 provides that the Property shall be used for low -density residential development. The Agency's consultant commissioned a real property appraisal to determine the current market value of a typical Agency owned rental property. The appraisal, dated April 13, 1999, indicated a current fair market value of $85,000. The Agency owned rental unit sold in August, 1999 was also appraised at a market value of $85,000. This value coincides with other similarly sized units in the Cove. Estimated Value of the Interest to be Conveyed, Determined at the Use With the Conditions, Covenants, and Development Costs Required by the Agreement The Agreement provides that the Property will be sold at the current market value of $85,000, which reflects the fair market value. C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\Summary report 52-690 Herrera.doc 2 v 0 J 377 Explanation of Why the Sale of the Property Pursuant to the Agreement will Assist in the Elimination of Blight The Agreement provides for the sale of the Property and the recordation of affordability covenants that will insure its continued affordability to a very low-income household for 30 years. Thus, the transaction will insure the continued affordability of a single-family dwelling to a very low-income household. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\Summary report 52-690 Herrera.doc 3 006 St T4ht 4 4 Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Continued Public Hearing on Tentative Tract Map 27519 (Aliso Del Rey) to Eliminate a Condition of Approval Requiring Golf Course Screening Along the South Boundary Located on the East Side of Dune Palms Road and 100 Feet South of Desert Stream Drive. Applicant: Century -Crowell Communities AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 27519 (Revision #1), subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval. None. �3IWAVi5114[q_"%I Is]► None. On February 1, 2000, the City Council continued this project to February 15, 2000 to allow the applicant additional time to negotiate purchasing portions of the La Quinta Golf Ranch for development of single family housing units. On January 5, 1999, the City Council, on a 5-0 vote, adopted Resolutions 99-06 (EA) and 99-07 (TTM) approving a 70 single family lot subdivision on this site (Attachment 1). The conditions of approval require the developer to work with the owner of the golf school to the south to provide security screening along the south Tract boundary to protect future residents from stray golf balls. 399 A Srcc Tr 27519Rev - 39 Prototype houses for the project were approved by the Planning Commission on April 13, 1999 under Site Development Permit 99-648. The single story houses range in size from 1,500 square feet to more than 2,000 square feet. Project Request The vacant site is located to the south of the Topaz development on the west side of Dune Palms Road. Vacant properties to the east of the site, across Dune Palms Road, are in the City of Indio. The applicant requests elimination of the golf course screening required along the south boundary of the Tract because their firm is in the process of acquiring 7.65 acres from the La Quinta Golf Ranch to the south to develop 30 single family houses under Tentative Tract Map 29563 and Site Development Permit 99-662 (Aliso Del Rey ll). Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission considered this revision request at its meeting of November 23, 1999, and by a 4-0 vote recommended approval by adoption of Resolution 99- 079, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2). Condition 93 was modified to read: "The requirement for Golf Course screening along the south property line shall be deleted upon the close of escrow of the purchase of the La Quinta Golf Ranch property by the applicant and closure of the Golf School. Proof of the close of escrow shall be supplied to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of any of the houses in the Tract (Condition 93 is now Condition 92)." Public Notice This revision request was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 11, 1999, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the Tract boundaries as required by the Subdivision Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code and Charter. Written Correspondence On January 31, 2000, the Community Development Department received a letter from the applicant requesting changes to their original request which was heard by the Planning Commission last year (Attachments 3 and 4). The Community Development Director will address these new issues at the Public Hearing. A Srcc Tr 27519Rev - 39 Findings necessary to approve this request can be made and are contained in the attached Resolution. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 27519 (Revision #1), subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval as attached; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the subdivision map condition change request; or 3. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, ry Her mmunity Development Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Reduced Tract Map Exhibit 2. November 23, 1999 Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) 3. Letter from Century Homes dated January 31, 2000 4. Tract Phasing Map A Srcc Tr 27519Rev - 39 381 r V0% RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27519 (REVISION #1), A REQUEST TO ELIMINATE THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRING GOLF COURSE SCREENING ALONG THE SOUTH TRACT BOUNDARY OF A 70-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 17.6 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DUNE PALMS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 100-FEET SOUTH OF DESERT STREAM DRIVE CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27519, REVISION #1 APPLICANT: CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 21 st day of December, 1999, 41h day of January, 2000, 1" day of February, 2000, and 151h day of February, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider the request of Century -Crowell Communities to eliminate the Condition of Approval requiring golf course screening along the south tract boundary of a 70-lot single family subdivision on 17.6 acres generally located to the west of Dune Palms Road, approximately 100-feet south of Desert Stream Drive, more particularly described as: Assessor's Parcel Number 604-061-009; Portion of SE 1 /4 of the SW 1 /4 of Section 20, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of Riverside, California; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 23`d day of November, 1999, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of Century -Crowell Communities to eliminate the Condition of Approval requiring golf course screening along the south tract boundary of a 70-lot single family subdivision on a vote of 4-0 adopted Resolution 99-079, subject to conditions. The site is WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 5th day of January, 1999, on a 5-0 vote, adopt Resolutions 99-06 (EA) and 99-07 (TTM) approving a 70-lot single family subdivision on 17.6 acres generally located to the west of Dune Palms Road, approximately 100-feet south of Desert Stream Drive; and 382 A:\ResoCcTr27519X.wpd (39) V 4. Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract 27519 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 24t' day of November, 1998, recommend to the City Council certification of Environmental Assessment 98-370 and approval of Tentative Tract Map 27519 by adoption of Resolutions 98-082 and 98-083; and WHEREAS at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following Mandatory Findings of approval for Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1: Finding Number 1 - Consistency with General Plan/Zoning Code A. The property is designated Low Density Residential (LDR) allowing residential development of 2-4 units per acre. The project is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Element (Chapter 2.0) because less than four dwellings per acre are proposed (i.e., Policy 2- 1 .1.5). The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan Circulation Element. B. The RL District (Low Density Residential) permits single family housing, provided lots are 7,200 square feet or larger. Proposed lots exceed the minimum size allowed pursuant Section 9.30.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. Detached single family houses will be built as allowed. Conditions insure compliance with City Code requirements. C. Decorative open perimeter fencing shall be constructed for the development consistent with Policy 3-4.1.14 of the General Plan, including opening view fencing to lessen the effect of the walled community and its relationship with adjacent properties. Finding Number 2 - Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act A. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was certified by the City Council on January 5, 1999, by adoption of Resolution 99.06, concluding that the project will not significantly affect the environment, provided Mitigation Monitoring is completed (EA 98-370). No changed circumstances or conditions exist that would trigger a new environmental assessment for this revision request. 383 A:\ResoCcTr27519X.wpd (39) Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract 27519 Findina Number 3 - Site and Landscape Design A. The proposed site design conforms with the design guidelines identified in the General Plan, Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance and provides a harmonious transition between other residential properties that abut the site. B. The proposed common landscaping will be privately maintained. The landscape design complements the surrounding residential areas in that it enhances the aesthetic and visual quality of the area. Existing mature landscaping along the north Tract boundary shall be retained and maintained by the HOA. C. The previously developed site is physically suitable for Tentative Tract Map 27519 in that the topographic relief of the project site is relatively flat and soil type is suitable for residential development. D. A common retention basin is proposed to contain on -site stormwater. The design of the subdivision, as conditionally approved, will not cause serious public health problems because they will install urban improvements based on City, State, and Federal requirements. E. The proposed private streets provide direct access to each residential lot. New off -site improvements will benefit both existing and future developments in the immediate area. Finding Number 4 - Site Improvements A. New improvements required for this project will be compatible with existing improvements to the north in the Topaz development. No adverse impacts have been identified based on letters of response from affected public agencies. Infrastructure improvements will be extended to serve the project if not readily adjacent to the site. B. A stormwater basin ensures off -site properties are not impacted from seasonal storms. C. The Tract design will not conflict with existing public easements, as the project has been designed around, and in consideration of these easements. D. A Condition of Approval requiring screening along the south side of the Tract will ensure outdoor safety to future residents from stray golf balls. However, if the driving range is replaced with a residential subdivision, this condition will no longer be applicable. 384 Uu� A:\ResoCcTr27519X.wpd (39) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 27519 (Revision #1) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on the 15`h day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 385 A:\ResoCcTr27519X.wpd (39) V RESOLUTION 2000- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 27519, REVISION #1 CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES FEBRUARY 15, 2000 1. Upon City Council approval, a memorandum noting that the City Conditions of Approval for this development exist and are available for review at City Hall shall be recorded against the property with Riverside County. 2. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map, or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 3. Tentative Tract Map 27519 (Revision #1) shall comply with the requirements and standards of § § 66410 through 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). 4. This Map shall expire on January 5, 2001, unless an extension of time is applied for, and granted by the City Council. 5. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. §1161C vv8 CondCCTT27519X - 39 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent received from the CWQCB prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 6. All easements, rights of way and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary to facilitate the ultimate use of the development and functioning of improvements shall be dedicated, granted or otherwise conferred, prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or a waiver of parcel map. Conferrals shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant easements to the City for emergency vehicles and for access to and maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements located on street, drainage or common lots or within utility and drainage easements. 7. Prior to approval of a final map, parcel map or grading plan, the applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 8. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners. 9. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 10. Dedications required of this development include: A. Dune Palms Road - 44' half of 88' right-of-way. B. On -site streets - 37' right-of-way. C. Applicant shall dedicate a 10' easement for pedestrian access to and from the proposed City park site located adjacent to the southerly west boundary of the proposed development 387 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #{1 February 15, 2000 Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for entry drives, dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant interim easements to those areas within 60 days of written request by the City. 1 1. The applicant shall dedicate utility easements as necessary to provide 10' of width outside of street and sidewalk improvements along both sides of all private streets 12. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Dune Palms Road - 10 feet Setbacks shall apply to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels, well sites and power substation sites. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 13. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to the following property from all frontage except entryways shown on the approved tentative map or as approved by the City Engineer: A. Dune Palms Road B. Proposed City park site. 14. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 15. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. 16. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media and in a program format acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. 388 V10 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. 17. Improvement plans submitted to the City for plan checking shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." All plans except precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, gates and entryways, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include landscape improvements, irrigation, lighting, and perimeter walls. Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 18. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 19. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. 20. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 389 v I i CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 21. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. Estimates for utilities and other improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, tract improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 22. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (plot plans, conditional use permits, etc.), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 23. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections or otherwise withhold approvals related to the development of the project until the applicant makes satisfactory progress on the improvements or obligations or has made other arrangements satisfactory to the City. 24. Graded, undeveloped land shall be maintained to prevent dust and blowsand nuisances. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 25. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 26. The applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report with the grading plan. 390 ul2 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #t1 February 15, 2000 27. The grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and shall be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 28. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. If compliance with this requirement is impractical, the City will consider and may approve alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 29. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications, stamped and signed by a California registered civil engineer or surveyor. The certifications shall list approved pad elevations, actual elevations, and the difference between the two, if any. The data shall be organized by lot number and shall be listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 30. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the development. 31. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 32. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual -lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2'/2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet all individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 33. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. 391 U13 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 34. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 35. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the basin plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 36. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1 . Maximum retention depth shall be six feet for common basins and two feet for lot -by -lot retention. 37. Nuisance water shall be retained on -site. A trickling sand filter and leachfield of a design approved by the City Engineer shall be installed to percolate nuisance water. The sand filter(s) shall be designed to infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft (of landscape area) and to accommodate surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. 38. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriff's Department), retention basins shall be visible from the adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 39. Existing and proposed utilities within or adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 40. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. 41. The City is contemplating adoption of a major thoroughfare improvement program. Any property within this development which has not been subdivided in accordance with this tentative map 60 days after the program is in effect shall be subject to the program. 42. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) 39 U14 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Dune Palms Road (Secondary Arterial): Construct 32 foot half of 64 foot (curb face to curb face) improvement plus 8-foot sidewalk. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Entry drive design shall be approved by the City Engineer, and shall conform with the following criteria: A. The entry drive shall have stacking space outside the Dune Palms Road right-of-way for a minimum of three vehicles. B. Drive shall be designed to allow U-turns for rejected vehicles without interference with an open exit gate. 2) Applicant shall construct a 10' wide minimum, gated pedestrian access to the proposed future city park site at the southerly west boundary of the development. 3) Residential - 36 feet wide if double loaded (building lots on both sides), 32 feet if single. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 43. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 44. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 45. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by California -registered professional engineer(s). 46. Street right of way geometry for cuts de sac, knuckle turns and corner cutbacks shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, #801, and #805 393 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. U 15) CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 47. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 48. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections are as follows: Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5 "/6.50" 49. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 50. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 51. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 52. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the City 394 Engineer. i CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 53. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 54. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 5-feet of curbs along public streets. 55. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, common basins and park areas shall be designed with grades and turf grass surface which can be mowed with standard tractor -mounted equipment. 56. The applicant shall ensure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above -ground utility structures. 57. The applicant shall construct perimeter walls and required landscaping to enclose the entire perimeter prior to final inspection and occupancy of any homes within the tract unless a phasing plan or construction schedule is approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 58. Landscape berms shall be used throughout the parkway landscaping as required by Section 9.60.240(F) of the Zoning Ordinance. 59. Mature trees shall be installed along Dune Palms Road (e.g., minimum 1 .75" to 3" diameter trunk width per tree type). Vandal proof ground mounted lighting shall be used periodically to accent the parkway trees. Shrubs shall be clustered to form distinctive design themes. 60. Front yard landscaping for future houses shall consist of a minimum of two shade trees (15 gallon with 1 " diameter trunk) and 10 five -gallon shrubs. Three additional 15 gallon trees shall be required for corner lot houses. All trees shall be double staked to prevent wind damage. Trees and shrubs shall be watered with emitters or bubblers. The developer is encouraged to use plants that are native to this area and drought tolerant. 61. Landscape and irrigation improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy of the house. The developer and subsequent property owner shall continuously maintain all required landscaping in a healthy and viable condition. 62. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 395 63. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other licensed professionals, as appropriate 1 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 64. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans and specifications. Where retention basins are installed, testing shall include a sand filter percolation test, as approved by the City Engineer, after required tract improvements are complete and soils have been permanently stabilized. 65. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans which were signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. 66, The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all required improvements unless expressly released from said responsibility by the City. 67. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. 68. The applicant shall comply with the terms and requirements of the Infrastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 69. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall pay a fee of $100.00 per acre for disturbing the habitat area of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. 70. Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall pay school mitigation fees to the Desert Sands Unified School District based on the State imposed fee in effect at that time. The school facilities fee shall be established by Resolution (i.e., State of California School Facilities Financing Act). 71. Prior to final map approval by the City Council, the property owner/developer shall meet the Parkland Dedication requirements by payment of in -lieu fees as set forth in Section 13.48 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. V13 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 72. Fire hydrants in accordance with CVWD Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1,500 g.p.m. for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of the streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 73. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer will furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans will conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system will meet the fire flow requirements. Plans will be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company wit the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department.". 74. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. 75. A temporary water supply for fire protection may be allowed for the construction of the model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 76. The minimum dimensions for fire apparatus access roads entering and exiting this project shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20-feet in each direction and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. 77. Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the traffic lane(s) serving that gate. All gates providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 40 feet from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop with obstructing traffic on the road. 78. Gates shall have either a secondary power supply or an approved manual means to release mechanical control of the gate in the event of loss of primary power. 79. Install Knox key operated switches, series KS-2P with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Knox Company. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval of mounting location/position and operating standards. Ordering forms are available at the Fire Department. The form must be authorized and signed by the Riverside County Fire Department personnel for the correctly coded system to be purchased. 80. Operation of the Knox key switch shall simultaneously open and control the gates 3 9 7- for both directions of travel. U19 CondCCT"T27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 81. Phased improvements shall be approved by the Fire Department. 82. Applicant/developer will provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrants are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. 83. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, the property owner/developer shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Department demonstrating compliance with those Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures of TTM 27519 and EA 98-370. Mitigation monitoring of the project site during grading is required. 84. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit, or ground disturbance, mitigation measures as recommended by the Cultural Resources Assessment and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for the site shall be completed at the applicant/developer's expense. This consists of having an archaeological monitor on -site during grading and earth disturbance operations. A final report shall be submitted for acceptance by the HPC prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of the first building. 85. All agency letters received for this case are made part of the case file documents for plan checking purposes. 86. Permanent tract identification signs shall be approved by the Planning Commission (i.e., Business Item). 87. Prior to final map approval, proposed street names shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Three names shall be submitted for each proposed private street. 88. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department for review a copy of the proposed Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the project. Approval of the CC and R's by the City Attorney is required. 89. The prototype house plans for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 9.210.010 (Site Development Permit) of the Zoning Ordinance. 90. Open fencing shall be constructed along Dune Palm Road adjacent to the retention 398 basin pursuant to General Plan Policy 3-4.1.14. In lieu of open fencing, a combination fence consisting of a low-level masonry wall with tubular steel fencing 0 CondCCTT27519X - 37 Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 27519, Revision #1 February 15, 2000 on top may be permitted, submitted to the approval by the Planning Commission. Rear yard walls constructed for Lots 1 and 2 shall be decorative (i.e., masonry block with stucco coating) and include pilasters spaced at 30-foot intervals. 91. The existing mature Eucalyptus trees on the north side of the retention basin and Lots 38 through 42 shall be retained in good condition, and not a danger to health and safety. Prior to final map approval, a landscape maintenance easement shall be established behind Lots 38 through 42 to maintain the existing Eucalyptus trees. The Homeowners' Association shall be required to maintain the trees in the landscape maintenance easement. 92. The requirement for Golf Course screening along the south property line shall be deleted upon the close of escrow of the purchase of the La Quinta Golf Ranch property by the applicant and closure of the Golf School. Proof of the close of escrow shall be supplied to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of any of the houses in the Tract. 399 021 CondCCTT27519X - 37 • ! JDWI . "_ _.... ��. Attachment 1 VMS 7 IOU >s { Dune Palms Road. r— toy _1 i at: all ZZ o% Lu w TM W " i i : 1 a" I`— Z < N e i A♦��� s " i • =� s Z i Z 1sit i : W � I _ aall i i _ �. • 61' a:: ;� ►i =w:a \ � � ••� 1 1�1 4 no 22 Cr Attachment 2 MINUTES HLE Copy PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA November 23, 1999 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. A. This meeti of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by 4Honeywell, rk who asked Commissioner Abels to lead the flag salute. B. missioners Jacques Abels, Richard Butler, Steve Robbins, Robert Tyler, n Tom Kirk. C. Jerry Herman, Community De pment D' ctor, City Attorney Dawn Planning Manager Chri di Iorio, Se or Engineer Steve Speer, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and ecutive Secret etty Sawyer. II. IIJBLIC COMMENT: None. IW TION OF Tim AGENDA: CONSENT A. 049rman Kirk asked if there wjPage corrections to the Minute ovember 9, 1999. Commissioner Tyler ask2, Item 3 be ed by deleting the word "not" at the end of the firsce. There bem*P11further changes, it was moved and seconded by Comms Robbins er to approve the minutes as corrected. Unanimously appro Department Report: None. V PU IC HEARINGS: A. request of Century -Crowell Communities for a recommendation of approval to eliminate a Condition of Approval requiring golf course screening along the south boundary of a 70 single family lot subdivision on 17.5 acres 1. Commissioner Butler excused himself due to a possible conflict of interest and withdrew from the dias. 401 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC11-23-99.wpd 1 r U24 Planning Commission Minutes November 23, 1999 2. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff requested that a change be made to recommended Condition #93 as follows: "The requirement for golf course screening along the south property line shall be deleted upon the close of escrow of the purchase of the La Quinta Golf Ranch property by the applicant. Proof of the close . of escrow shall be supplied to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of any of the homes in this Tract." 3. Commissioner Robbins stated that removal of the condition for screening based on the "close of escrow' does not guarantee the golf school will go away just because it is owned by someone else. Staff stated that is true, but it is staff s understanding the developer would close the school. The condition would be modified to state that no Certificates of Occupancy would be issued until the school was closed. 4. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mrs. Marty Butler, representing Century Crowell Communities, stated they supported the conditions as. submitted. 5. Mr. Gary Hopkins, owner of the La Quinta Golf Range, stated he concurred with the conditions, but questioned what would happen if the sale did not go through and homes were sold without the owners having knowledge that the Golf School could potentially remain. The escrow to purchase the school is to close in June, but if the sale does not go through and people see a screen being constructed at a later date, they do not want to have homeowners upset with them. The potential buyers should be notified that if it falls out of escrow, a screen will be installed. Chairman Kirk asked staff to address this issue. Ms. Butler stated they would issue a disclosure to all property owners and a copy would be given to staff. 6. There being no further discussion, Chairman Kirk closed the public hearing and opened the issue for Commission discussion. 7. There being no discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Tyler to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 99-079 recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 27519 Revision #2, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as amended. a. Condition #93: The requirement for golf course screening along the south property line shall be deleted upon the close of escrow of the purchase of the La Quinta Golf Ranch property by the applicant and 04 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC11-23-99.wpd 2 r P- nning Commission Minutes vember 23, 1999 closure of the Golf School. Proof of the close of escrow shall be supplied to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of any of the homes in this Tract. ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Butler. Commissioner Butler rejoined the Commission. B. Revised Tentative Tract Ma 2p 9147; a request of KSL Land Corporation for approval to increase the number of single faTily lots from 133 to 152, add other common lots, and remove a private street to 72.88 acres 1. Chairman Kirk ened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning M er Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff re , a copy of which is on file in the Community Development 2. SenijrEngineer Steve Speer went over the Public Works Department reEMeo ded revisions to the Conditions of Approval: Condition 437.A.1; #37.A.3; #38.A.*00 3. Cked if there were an uestions of staff. Commissioner Tyler asked staff if the lots were still a ve the minimum square footage required by the Specific Plan. Staff sta this was true. 4. Chairman Kirk asked if the applican ould like to address the Commission. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulti representing the applicant, stated they concurred with all the conditions revised. He requested that Condition #70 have the word "residential' ad d at the beginning of the sentence. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked a applicant to show on the map the changes proposed. Mr. Bergh did so. 6. There being no further discussion, Chairman Kirk closed ublic hearing and opened the issue for Commission discussion. 7. There being no discussion, it was moved and secised by Commissioners Butler/Abels to adopt Planning CommissResolution 99-080 recommending to the City Council approval of ReTentative Tract Map 29147, subject to the Findings and Conditions ofval as amended. a. Condition #5: Delete b. Condition #36: Delete 403 CAMy Documents\WPD0CS\PC11-23-99.wpd 3 IJ26 CENTURY HOMES Century Crowell Communities January 31, 2000 Mr. Jerry Herman Director, Community Development Department City of La Quinta RE: TRACT # 27519 Dear Jerry: HAND DELIVERED Attachment 3 in •w 0 � E. I would like to modify our request to revise Condition #93 of Tract 27519. At the time that I applied for the request our company was in escrow to purchase the La Quinta Golf Ranch. It would appear that the purchase will not be completed but we would like to pursue a modification of the Condition that would allow for similar circumstance. We request that the golf course screening on the south property line be deleted at such time that the La Quinta Golf Ranch either sells the property for future development or ceases to extend the Conditional Use Permit it operates under. We would also request that the golf course screening be provided prior to the issuance of building permits on Lots 1-20 and not at time of building permits. This is requested because we intend to build on the far north boundary of the property which is a great distance from the golf driving range, to be exact our models are 600 ft due North of the driving range and our first phase closest house is 500 ft. North. If you account for the angle of the driving range to our property these distances become even greater. We look forward to building this subdivision and intend to comply fully with all of the terms and conditions noted by the City of La Quinta. Sincerely Yours, MARTY W. BUTLER Project Director 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 • San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 381-6007 • FAX (909) 381-0041 404, U I a voa Sfv7 vd �n�na f s 0 n 'r tV o �a ;?n #a t v • to ^ � � a xa a e > 1� ji- 4 i - M-L i� xN w tM to t, lh W RIM l0 n m B x V tP N In In N X x N P USIA ONIJYVO r e K N �N 1e N N N Attachment 4 2 N [ ry uu m 0.0 `t b— Off, Vbb Mvti „nn oouo°t°eb° EI°E x o o.nharl in CL F-4 e- s o In N to O 1 t� d' 1 Ln CV) Lr) c'M O 1 1 N CM N r-1 to V) N i-� 4-) 4-) O 'O O J J J II IF it N f+M N tN 0 to fO M t t t Cl. a a 40�. u28 TAt!t 4 w'*PQu&rw COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 15, 2000 Public Hearing on Environmental Assessment 99-389 Recommending Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact; General Plan Amendment 99-064 Recommending Approval of a Pre -Annexation General Plan Designation from County Designation 2b (2-5 units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 units per acre); Zone Change 99-092 Recommending a Change from County Designation R-1-9000 to Low Density Residential; Specific Plan 99-040 Recommending Approval of Development Standards and Design Guidelines for a Residential Development; and Approval of Tentative Tract Map 29323 to Allow the Development of 379 Residential Units on 117 Acres Located on the Northwest Corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Applicant: Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering RECOMMENDATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: y3- Adopt a Resolution of the City Council upholding the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99- 064, Zone Change 99-092, Specific Plan 99-040 and Tentative Tract Map 29323. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The subject property is currently located outside the City limits, at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. The applicant has requested annexation into the City of La Quinta. Prior to annexation, the City requires that the CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh.016.wpd 400 General Plan designation and Zoning be established to City standards. In addition, the applicant has filed applications for a Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map to establish design standards for the development, and subdivide the 117 acres, respectively. The General Plan and Zoning designations proposed by the applicant are for Low Density Residential development. The Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map allow 379 dwelling units on 117 acres, resulting in an overall density of 3.23 units per acre. The proposed General Plan and Zoning designations are compatible with surrounding development in the area, which is characterized by single family residences, either in traditional neighborhoods or around golf course development. Project Request The Tentative Tract Map subdivides the land into three planning areas which are envisioned in the Specific Plan to allow three types of residential development. Planning Area 1 would result in 132 residential units on lots averaging 4,840 square feet. Specific deviations from City standards proposed in this planning area are discussed further below. Planning Area 2 includes 129 residential units, on average lots sizes of 9,333 square feet. Planning Area 3 proposes 118 homes on lots averaging 10,923 square feet. The Specific Plan includes design standards, road standards and landscaping standards for common areas. The proposed project significantly reduces the City's zoning standards within its Planning Area 1. Planning Area 1 proposes significant deviation from the City's standards,, including lot size; minimum dwelling unit size; front, side and rear setbacks; lot frontage; and maximum lot coverage. Each of these deviations is discussed below. Lot Size Planning Area 1 proposes the subdivision of 15 net acres into 132 lots. The average lot size within this area is 4,840 square feet. The Specific Plan states that open space areas are provided around the planning area to allow common recreation. No specific amenities are proposed or required. Lot C, which surrounds the Planning area on three sides, totals 6.25 acres, and is primarily provided to satisfy on -site retention requirements. Although lot sizes in this planning area are much smaller than the City standard, the residential product described in the Specific Plan is typical of many residential country club products provided in the City and elsewhere in the Valley, but does not provide the typical recreational amenities. Private recreational amenities will be limited or impossible to construct on 4800 square foot lots. The Specific Plan does not mandate common area amenities, but states that further details will be provided in the Site Development process. Without a mandate in the Specific Plan for specific amenities, they are unlikely to be constructed. Staff recommends that Specific Plan Condition #72 be included, which requires the addition of specific recreational amenities to the Specific Plan text, thereby insuring that future merchant builders will adhere to minimum standards. 407 v 021 CAMv Documents\WPDOCS\ccih.016.wad Minimum Dwelling Unit Size The Specific Plan proposes that minimum dwelling unit size in Planning Area 1 be reduced from the Zoning Code required 1,400 square feet to 1200 square feet. The Planning Area is not proposed for either low income or senior housing, both of which could justify a reduction in standards. Staff therefore recommends the inclusion of Specific Plan Condition #69, which requires that the dwelling unit size be increased to a minimum of 1400 square feet, to conform to the City's standard. Setbacks Within Planning Area 1, the Specific Plan allows for reductions in front setbacks from 20 feet to 15 feet; rear setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet; and side setbacks from 5/10 feet to 0/10 feet. The proposal in this area is to allow zero lot line construction, with a mandated 10 feet on one side of each home, resulting in a 10 foot separation between houses. In order to achieve the size of units contemplated and recommended above, such standards are necessary. Lots are generally 45 feet in width, and 100 feet long. In order to construct a 1800 square foot house (the largest proposed in the Specific Plan), plus a garage, the house will have to be 35 feet wide and 65 feet long. With a 15 foot front setback, as proposed, the house would have up to 20 feet of rear yard. Lot Frontage As discussed above, the construction within Planning Area 1 is proposed to be on very small lots. Based on Exhibit H-a of the Specific Plan, each home would have a 20 foot driveway, a 10 foot side yard setback, and approximately 10 to 15 feet of house frontage on a lot. Lot Coverage As discussed above, in order to provide for up to 1,800 square feet of living space, plus a garage, on a 4840 square foot lot, increased lot coverage is required from the Zoning Code of 40% to 45%. As currently planned, the largest home could not be sited on lots less than 4,900 square feet in size. As depicted on the tentative tract map, the majority of the lots in Planning Area I are 4,500 square feet in size. These lots can accommodate a house of 1,625 sq. Ft (plus a 400 square foot garage) at 45% lot coverage. As stated in the setback section above, the rear yard of a house in this Planning Area will be approximately 20 feet in depth. After deduction of the patio areas, the usable rear yard is likely to be about 10 or 12 feet deep. This area will not allow for significant private recreational amenities, thereby supporting the need for common area amenities as discussed above under Lot Size. Site -specific design issues can be further reviewed and refined through the Site Development Permit process for individual planning areas, which will be required. 408 31 CAW Documents\WPDOCS\ccih.016.wgd Western and Northern Boundary Wall The Specific Plan proposes to simply abut the existing residential walls which occur behind the homes at Bermuda Dunes Country Club. No new wall construction is proposed on these boundaries. The location of these existing walls, based on examination of Exhibit A of the Specific Plan, is not continuous. In addition, some of the homes appear to have either constructed fences or nothing at all on their rear property line. Since neither•the location or condition of the walls is clearly established, and since this project is envisioned as a planned integrated community, a Condition of Approval has been added (#70) to require amendment of the Specific Plan to include a continuous wall on the western and northern boundaries of the project. Circulation The City Engineer will allow only right -in, right -out and left -in turning movements for the proposed project entry ways, in conformance with City General Plan and Zoning ordinance standards. The project will be required to widen adjacent portions of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street to their ultimate rights -of -way. The proposed project includes private roadways ranging from 41 feet in width to 33 feet in width. The City Engineer has expressed a concern regarding the narrowing of any street which provides ingress or egress for 100 or more homes. Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Condition #7 has been added which requires that Sandy Point Drive, South Beach Drive, White Cloud Drive, and Spanish Wells Drive be constructed to a minimum of 41 feet paved width. These modifications can be made to the Final Tract Map, subject to City Engineer's review and approval. In addition, the Fire Department has requested restricted parking on the narrow residential streets, in order to ensure that their equipment can travel through these streets. Condition of Approval #71 has been added which requires amendment of the Specific Plan to reflect restricted parking. Site Development Permits and additional California Environmental Quality Act review will be required for development of each of the planning areas. In addition, no signage is proposed within the Specific Plan. Further review of project signage will occur at a later date. Public Notice: This map application was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on December 8, 1999. All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public hearing notice as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Public Agency Review: All written comments received are on file with the Community Development Department. All applicable agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case. 409 , A CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh.016.wpd Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this item on December 14, 1999, (Attachment 1) . The public hearing was continued with the recommendation that the applicant modify the Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map increasing the size of the smallest lots and provide recreational amenities. The Planning Commission at their meeting of January 25, 2000 and the City Council at their meeting of February 1, 2000, continued the public hearing as the applicant requested additional time to revise the plan. The applicant subsequently requested that the Planning Commission consider the original proposal, and that no changes would be made to the applications. In their deliberations on February 8, 2000 (Attachment 2), the Planning Commission felt that the deviations from the City's existing standards were significant, and that these deviations would negatively impact the quality of the development. Of particular concern was the lack of common area amenities associated with the smaller lots in Planning Area 1. The Planning Commission was also clearly disappointed that the applicant had made no effort to address the issues raised at the first hearing on the matter in December. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of all applications. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council upholding the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-092, Specific Plan 99-040 and Tentative Tract Map 29323; or 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council Certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 99-389; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 99- 064; and Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading, and move to introduce Ordinance No. _ on first reading approving Zone Change 99-092; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 9.9-040, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; and Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map 29323, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; or 4 1- 0 � v CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh.016.wpd 3. Return the applications to the Planning Commission for further consideration; or 4. Continue the request and provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Herman munity Development Director Approved for submission by, -Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Minutes of December 14, 1999. 2. Planning Commission Minutes of February 8,2000 3. Specific Plan 99-040 Document (Large document -Council only) 4. Tentative Tract Map 29323 (Map -Council only) CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\ccjh.016.wpd 411 QUU RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DENYING THE CERTIFICATION OF A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, A PRE -ANNEXATION GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION, A ZONE CHANGE FROM COUNTY DESIGNATION TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES OR A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW 379 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 117 ACRES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-064, ZONE CHANGE 99-092 SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of la Quinta, California did on the 151h day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-092, Specific Plan 99-040, and Tentative Tract Map 29323, for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 141h day of December, 1999, 25th day of January, 2000, and the 81h day of February, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-092, Specific Plan 99-040, and Tentative Tract Map 29323, for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering; and, WHEREAS, the City Council on February 8th, 2000 found reasons to deny the project in that it is not consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan for development in the City of La Quinta due to small lot sizes and lack of recreational amenities; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the above reasons to justify denying said applications: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council for this project. 2. That it does hereby deny Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-092, Specific Plan 99-040, and Tentative Tract Map 29323 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. 41 90 0 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ResoCCd Sand Harbor.wpd Planning Commission Resolution 2000-005 Sand Harbor - Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering February 8, 2000 PASSES, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 413 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\ResoCCd Sand Harbor.wpd RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE. DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-064, ZONE CHANGE 99- 092, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 AND SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 99-389 APPLICANT: WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 15th day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an Environmental Assessment prepared for General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-062, Tentative Tract Map 29323 and Specific Plan 99-040, ("the proposed project") generally located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 14th day of December, 1999, the 25th day of January, 2000, and 81h day of February, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider an Environmental Assessment prepared for General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-062, Tentative Tract Map 29323 and Specific Plan 99-040, ("the proposed project") generally located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as follows: APNs 609-380-022 and 609-380-023 WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970"(as amended; Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study (EA 99-389) and has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because appropriate mitigation measures were made a part of the assessment and included in the conditions of approval for Specific Plan 99-040, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify certifying of said Environmental Assessment: 414 U City Council Resolution 2000- Environmental Assessment 99-389 1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 99-389. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 3. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified by the Environmental Assessment. 4. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed subdivision. 5. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. 6. There is no evidence to show that State mandated school fees will not be adequate to address impacts to school facilities, in that the proposed project as proposed, does not affect the current land use as it would be assessed at time of development, whether or not the project was implemented. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitutes the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 99-389 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum on file in the Community Development Department. 4.1 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\SP99-040 ccreso EA.wpd U JL City Council Resolution 2000- Environmental Assessment 99-389 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEN, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM:. DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California CAMy Documents\WPDOMSP99-040 ccreso EA.wpd JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 416-ul1 ,Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Sand Harbor Specific Plan (SP 99-040) General Plan Amendment 99-064 Change of Zone 99-092 Tentative Tract 29323 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Christine di lorio 760-777-7125 4. Project Location: Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Wade Ellis 41-865 Boardwalk, #212 Palm Desert, CA 92211 6. General Plan Designation: Riverside County: 2B, 2-5 units per acre Proposed La Quinta: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: Riverside County: R-1/9,000 Proposed La Quinta: RL, Low Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Pre -annexation application to establish General Plan designation, Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Maps for vacant lands located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Specific Plan will establish standards for the development of 379 dwelling units on 117 acres. 9. Surrounding Lane Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings. Lands to the north and west are developed single family residential neighborhoods. The Bermuda Dunes Golf Course is also located to the north. Lands to the south are vacant, and lands to the southwest are developed as single family dwellings. Lands to the east are partially developed with a golf course and single family residential. 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Local Agency Formation Commission 41 i PACHRISTI\envirAlist sp 99-040.wpd Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning X Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing X Biological Resources X Utilities and Service Systems X Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Aesthetics X Water Hazards X1 Cultural Resources X Air Quality X Noise Recreation Mandatory Finds of Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature Printed Name Date For 418 013 PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd Evaluation of Environmerital Impacts: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the reference information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analysis are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. See the sample question below. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7) This is only a.suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different ones. PACHRISTI\envirAlist sp 99-040.wpd 419 U 4 3 Sample question: Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1,6) (Attached source list explains that 1 is the general plan, and 6 is a USGS topo map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (General Plan Land Use Map) Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies X adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (General Plan EIR, p. 4-1 ff.) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (General X Plan Land Use Map, Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to X soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established X community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population X projections? (General Plan Master Environmental Assessment, p. 2-32 ff. ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly X (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension or major infrastructure)? (General Plan Goal 2-3, Objective 2-3.1) 420 01- PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? X (Aerial Photograph, Exhibit A of Specific Plan) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35) X b) Seismic ground shaking? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan X EIR, Exhibit 4.2-3, page 4-35 and page 4-30 ff.) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (General Plan EIR, page X 4-30 ff.) e) Landslides or mudflows? (General Plan EIR, page 4-30 ff.) X f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions X from excavation, grading, or fill? (Southland Geotechnical, Geotechnical Investigation, June 24, 1999) g) Subsidence of the land? (Southland Geotechnical, X Geotechnical Investigation, June 24, 1999) h) Expansive soils? (Southland Geotechnical, Geotechnical X Investigation, June 24, 1999) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (General Plan, page 8-7) I X IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and X amount of surface runoff? (Specific Plan p. 19 ff., Tract Map 29323) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such X as flooding? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.3-1, page 4-53) PACHRISTI\enviccklist sp 99-040.wpd `! n i ' U �� Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface X water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Specific Plan document, p. 19 ff.) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (Specific Plan document, p. 19 ff.) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (General Plan EIR, page 4-51 ff.) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct X additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (General Plan EIR, page 4-55 ff.) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (General X Plan EIR, page 4-55 ff.) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (General Plan EIR, page 4- X 57 ff.) i) Substantial reduction in the arhount of groundwater otherwise X available for public water supplies? (General Plan EIR, page 4- 57 ff.) V. AIR QUALITY Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or X projected air quality violation? (General Plan EIR, page 4-171 ff.) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (General Plan EIR, page 4-171 ff.) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (General Plan MEA, page 5-33 ff.) A� d) Create objectionable odors? (Specific Plan project description) X AJ4 PACHRISTI\envirAlist sp 99-040.wpd Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (RKJK & Assoc., X Traffic Impact Analysis, November 23, 1999) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or X dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (RKJK & Assoc., Traffic Impact Analysis, November 23, 1999) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? X (Specific Plan Site Plan) d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? (Specific Plan, X p. 17) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (Specific X Plan, p. 17) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative X transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Specific Plan p. 17) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (General Plan MEA) X VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats X (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69, and page 4- 71 ff. ) b) Locally designated species (e:g., heritage trees)? (General X Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69, and page 4-71 ff.) 423 v18 PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, X coastal habitat, etc.)? (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4- 69, and page 4-71 ff.) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? X (General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.4-1, page 4-69) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (General Plan EIR, X page 4-71 ff.) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (General X Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient X manner? (General Plan MEA, page 5-26 ff.) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource X that would be of future value to the region and the residents of IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous X substances (including, but not lirnited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or X emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA, page 6-27 ff.) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X (Specific Plan Project Description) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (Specific Plan Project Description) PACHRISTI\envir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd X. XI. XII Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or X trees? (Specific Plan Project Description) NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Douglas Eilar & X Associates, Acoustical Analysis, August 5, 1999) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Douglas Eilar & X Associates, Acoustical Analysis, August 5, 1999) PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) b) Police protection? (General Plan MEA, page 4-3 ff.) c) Schools? (General Plan MEA, page 4-9) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (General Plan MEA, pages 3-3, 4-7) e) Other governmental services? (General Plan MEA, page 4-14 X ff.) UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (General Plan MEA, page 4-26) X b) Communications systems? (General Plan MEA, page 4-29) X 4�5 PACHRISTI\enviccklist sp 99-040.wpd Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (General Plan MEA, page 4-20) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (General Plan MEA, page 4-24) e) Storm water drainage? (General Plan MEA, page 4-27) f) Solid waste disposal? (General Plan MEA, page 4-28) MMM g) Local or regional water supplies? (General Plan MEA, page X 4-20) XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (General Plan Exhibit X CIR-5) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (General Plan EIR, page 5-12 ff.) c) Create light or glare? (Specific Plan p. 26) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Paleontological Lakebed X Determination Study, Community Development Department) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Archaeological X Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) c) Affect historical resources? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) MMM 426 v21 PACHRISTI\enviccklist sp 99-040.wpd Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Mitigated Impact Impact d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would X affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential X impact area? (Archaeological Associates, Archaeological Assessment of TT 29323, August 31, 1999) XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or X other recreational facilities? (Specific Plan Project Description) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (General Plan, Exhibit PR-1) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare to endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to X the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directory or indirectly? X 427 r PACHRISTI\envirAlist sp 99-040.wpd XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analysis and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. f' 428 PACHRISTI\envir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd Addendum to Environmental Checklist, EA 99-389 I. a) The proposed project is not currently within the City's jurisdiction. The County General Plan designation, however, and that sought by the applicant as part of this application, are consistent. Differences between the two general plans relating to the intent of the land use designations are insignificant. Through the annexation process, the project will be assigned a City designation, which is compatible with existing development both under County and City jurisdiction. II. a) The proposed project is not currently within the City's jurisdiction, nor was it analyzed for future annexation in the existing General Plan. As such, the project area, and the 948f people it will generate at buildout were not previously analyzed by the City. However, the land use designation assigned this site by the County is compatible with the proposed land use designation, and the additional population would therefore have been analyzed under County plans. The project is not likely to significantly impact population projections for the region. Ill.a), b) & c) The City is located in a seismically active area. The proposed project is located in a Zone IV groundshaking zone. The project site is not within a liquefaction hazard area. The City has implemented provisions in the Uniform Building Code for seismically active areas. The project will be required to conform to these standards. A geotechnical investigation was performed for the proposed project'. It recommends specific foundation and soil compacting requirements which will mitigate the impacts of seismic activity. These mitigation measures will ensure that impact from seismic activity will be reduced to a level of insignificance. Ill.f), g) & h) The project falls within a blowsand hazard zone, and is composed of potentially unstable soils. Construction of the project will be subject to City Engineer review, the preparation of dust control plans, and the mitigation measures contained in the geotechnical study cited above. The recommendations contained in this study, and continued City review of the project, will reduce the potential impact from erosion of soils to a level of insignificance. All earth moving activities shall be coordinated to ensure that the mitigation measures contained under section XIV (Cultural Resources) of this addendum shall be properly implemented. IV.a) & b) The construction of structures on currently vacant lands will reduce the amount of land available for absorption of water into the ground, and has the potential to increase surface runoff. The City will require the retention of the 100 year 24 hour storm on -site, and the Tentative Tract Map has been prepared to reflect the "Geotechnical Investigation -Tentative Tract 29323 La Quinta, California, Southland Geotechnical, June 24, 1999. PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd 13 429 �,� construction of a number of retention basins. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project proponent shall submit hydrologic analysis to the City Engineer for review and approval which will demonstrate that the planned retention basins are sufficient to retain the 100 year storm. This will reduce the potential hazard associated with increased runoff to a level of insignificance. V. a) The Coachella Valley is currently in a non -attainment area for PM10 (particles of 10 microns or less). The proposed project will result in 379 single family dwelling units. The primary long term air quality impact caused by these units will be from the operation of automobiles; short term impacts are also likely from construction activities. The proposed project shall implement the following mitigation measures to mitigate impacts to air quality. 1. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction 'personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Construction parking shall be configured to minimize traffic interference. 5. Construction of improvements on Fred Waring and Jefferson shall be scheduled for off-peak traffic hours and shall minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. 6. Cut and fill quantities will be balanced on site. 7. The project shall submit a PM10 Plan to the City which includes adequate provisions for fugitive dust and wind erosion control, both during and after grading operations. The PM10 Plan shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of any grading permit on the site. 8. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 9. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on -going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. P:\CHRISTI\envir.cklist sp 99-040.wpd 430 u 2' 14 10. All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion until the site is constructed upon. Pad sites which are to remain undeveloped shall be seeded with either a desert wildflower mix or grass seed. 11. Landscaped areas shall be installed as soon as possible to reduce the potential for wind erosion. 12. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site. 13. Construction roads other than temporary access roads shall be paved as soon as possible, and once paved shall be cleaned after each work day. All unpaved roads shall be posted with a 15 mile per hour speed limit. 14. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 15. All buildings on the project site shall conform to energy use guidelines in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 16. The project proponent shall comply with all applicable SCAQMD Rules and Regulations. VI. a), b), d), & e) A traffic impact analysis was prepared for the proposed Specific Plane. The analysis included existing conditions analysis, trip generation forecasts, and future traffic volumes. The total estimated traffic generation is estimated to be 3,627 daily trips, of which 284 are expected during the morning peak hour, and 382 during the evening peak hour. The improvements required with or without project implementation include the signalization of Jefferson Street at both Country Club Drive and Miles Avenue, and the widening of Fred Waring and Jefferson to their ultimate rights of way in the vicinity of the proposed project. The traffic impact analysis includes the following mitigation measures, which shall be implemented as part of the development of the project site: 1. The project proponent shall improve both Jefferson Street and Fred Waring Drive, along their entire property boundary, to their ultimate 120 right of way (half width) in conjunction with the first phase of development. 2. Sight distances shall be reviewed to conform with City of La Quinta standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscaping and street improvement plans. "Tentative Tract Map No. 29323 Traffic Impact Analysis (revised)," RKJK & Associates, November 23, 1999. PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd 431u26 15 3. The project proponent shall participate in the City's traffic mitigation fee program. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, and the planned improvements associated with the implementation of the City's General Plan, all project related roadways will operate within acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better) at project buildout. The project is therefore not expected to have a significant impact on the circulation system. The Specific Plan includes an interior trail system. The trail system interfaces with the interior street system at a number of locations. In order to ensure that no significant hazard occurs to pedestrians using the trail system, the project proponent shall be required to install stop signs and crosswalks at all intersections between the trail and a paved roadway. The stop signs shall be for pedestrian traffic. VI I. a), b) & c) The site occurs within an area designated as potential habitat for the Giant Sand Treader Cricket in the General Plan. In conjunction with the first application for Site Development Permit; the project proponent shall submit a focused survey for Giant Sand Treader Cricket to the City for review and approval. The survey shall include mitigation measures, if necessary, and a mitigation monitoring program. The project also occurs in the mitigation fee area for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard. The project proponent shall be required to pay the fee in effect at the time of issuance of building permits to mitigate impacts to this species. Should the project, or any portion of the project, occur after implementation of the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan, any mitigation required by that plan shall be applied to the project, or any portion of the project. X. a) & b) A noise analysis was prepared, and subsequently amended, for the proposed project'. The project area lies in a currently impacted noise corridor. Residential dwelling units are considered sensitive noise receptors. The City's General Plan requires that exterior noise levels for any portion of a residential lot not exceed 60 dBA CNEL, and that interior noise levels not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. The study found that varying heights of walls were needed to mitigate exterior noise levels along Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. The study also recommended the elevation of certain pads to mitigate noise levels. Finally, the study requires the preparation of additional analysis to recommend mitigation measures for interior noise levels for any home to be constructed with a second story which has a full or partial view of either Fred Waring or Jefferson. In order to ensure that noise levels are mitigated to meet City standards, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. "Acoustical Analysis Report," Douglas Eilar & Associates, August 15 & November 29, 1999. A 3 2- r� w PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd 16 1. In conjunction with Site Development Permit application for any phase of development which includes homes with a partial or full view of Fred Waring or Jefferson, a noise analysis based on final pad elevations shall be prepared which demonstrates that both exterior and interior noise levels shall meet or exceed City standards. 2. The design and location of the outer perimeter wall shall conform to the recommendations of the November 29, 1999 amendment to the noise analysis, and shall combine a six foot block or slumpstone wall, constructed to City standard, with adequate berming to achieve the needed heights shown on the table labeled " Barrier and Berm Heights at Perimeter Lots to Achieve 60 CNEL." XI. a) - e) The proposed project is not expected to result in substantial adverse impacts to public services. The residences within the project will impact the school system, and such an impact must be mitigated through the imposition of school fees. XII. a) - g) The proposed project is served by local utilities and water and sewer districts. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall be required to demonstrate, through "will serve" letters, that all services are available to the site. No significant impact to service providers is expected from this project. XI I I.a) The proposed project occurs along one of the City's Primary Image Corridors. The General Plan requires a setback of 20 feet, which the project has proposed on its map. The implementation of the setback requirement will lower the impact to scenic resources to a less than significant level. XIV. a) The site occurs above the recorded shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla, as mapped on City maps. No significant impact to paleontologic resources is expected from this project. XIV.b), c), & d) A site specific Phase I cultural resource study has been completed for the proposed project'. The study found a potentially significant sites within the project boundary. Site CA-RIV-6349 was found to be potentially significant, and necessitate further study. The following mitigation measure shall therefore be implemented: 4 "An Archaeological Assessment of Tentative Tract 29323...," Archaeological Associates, August 31, 1999. 433 PACHRISTI\envincklist sp 99-040.wpd f) ! 17 ki40U In conjunction with the first Site Development Permit application for the project, the project proponent shall submit, for review and approval by the City, a comprehensive Phase II archaeological investigation, performed in conformance with City standards. The Phase II study shall include mitigation measures, and a mitigation monitoring plan. 2. An archaeological monitor shall be on site during any grubbing, earth moving or excavating activity. Should a resource be identified by the monitor, he or she shall be empowered to halt or redirect grading activities while the resource is properly identified and studied. The monitor shall file a report with the City of his or her findings, including disposition of any resource identified. 434 PACHRISMenvirAlist sp 99-040.wpd 18 RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ASSIGN PRE -ANNEXATION LAND USE DESIGNATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO 117 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET. CASE NO.:GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-064 APPLICANT: WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of a General Plan Amendment to assign a pre - annexation land use designation of Low Density Residential to 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 14th day of December, 1999, 251h day of January, 2000, and 81h day of February, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of a General Plan Amendment to assign a pre -annexation land use designation of Low Density Residential to 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APNs 609-380-022 and 609-380-023 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council on did make the following mandatory findings to approve said General Plan Amendment: 1. The General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and supports the development of a range of housing opportunities. 2. The General Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The General Plan Amendment is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports -the development of a range of housing in an integrated community. 4. The General Plan designation is compatible with the parcels on which it is proposed, and surrounding land uses as an extension of existing residential uses 435, in the vicinity. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\SP99-040 ccreso GPA.WPD Planning Commission Resolution 2000-_ General Plan Amendment 99-064 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 99- 389 assessed the environmental concerns of the General Plan Amendment; and, 3. That it does approve General Plan Amendment 99-064 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. , PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEI A, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney 4 3 City of La Quinta, California v 3 CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\SP99-040 ccreso GPA.WPD ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE ASSIGNING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION TO 117 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 99-092 WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 151h day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of a Zone Change to allow the pre -zoning of 117 acres, pending annexation to the City, at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearings, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and surrounding development and land use designations, ensuring land use compatibility. 2. The Zone Change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and cpnform with the City's standards and requirements. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of a range of housing in an integrated community. 4. The Zone Change, to be effective upon annexation of the property, supports the orderly development of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. To rezone a portion of land generally located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as APNs 609-380-022 and 609-380-023, from County designation R-1- 9000 to Low Density Residential (RL) to become effective upon annexation to the City of La Quinta, as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\Ord ZC 99-092 Wade Ellis.wpd 437 ti Ordinance No. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. This Zone Change has complied with the requirements of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended) and adopted by City Council Resolution 83-68, in that the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed Zone Change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by Resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this day of , 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM:. DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney 4 3 City of La Quinta, California CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\Ord ZC 99-092 Wade Ellis.wpd APPROXIMATELY 1941 ' EXHIBIT A ----------- I N � W W J ~ Q I LDR z � o o w CA_ I l� I s i i i i FRED WARING DRIVE SAND HARBOR PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 43 f� 3.4 RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 379 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 117 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET. CASE NO.: SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 APPLICANT: WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of February, 2000, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of development standards and design guidelines to allow the subdivision of 379 residential units on 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 14th day of December, 1999, 25th day of January, 2000, and 8th day of February, 2000, hold duly noticed Public Hearings for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of development standards and design guidelines to allow the subdivision of 379 residential units on 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APNs 609-380-022 and 609-380-023 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Specific Plan: 1 . The Specific Plan, once annexed to the City, is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and supports the development of a range of housing opportunities, as conditioned. 2. The Specific Plan will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. 3. The Specific Plan is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of a range of housing in an integrated community. ..l CAMy DocumentsMPDOMSP99-040 ccreso SP.WPD City Council Resolution 2000- Specific Plan 99-040 4. Development of the proposed Specific Plan is compatible with the parcels on which it is proposed, and surrounding land uses as an extension of existing residential uses in the vicinity. The project will be further reviewed through the Site Development Permit process, allowing for use -specific mitigation at that time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with the Conditions of Approval for the proposed project; 3. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 99- 389 assessed the environmental concerns of the Specific Plan; and, 4. That it does approve Specific Plan 99-040 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 151h day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 441 U 3 0 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\SP99-040 ccreso SP.WPD City Council Resolution 2000- Specific Plan 99-040 APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\SP99-040 ccreso SP.WPD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFICPLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 GENERAL 1. The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This tentative map and any final maps thereunder shall comply with the requirements and standards of §§66410 through 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside County Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District • Myoma Dunes Water District • Coachella Valley Water District • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 443 A3 PACHRISThSP99-04000A.doc Page 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 4. Final maps under this tentative map shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of final map approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a'final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street - The remainder of applicant's 60-foot half of a 120- foot right of way. 2. Fred Waring Drive - The remainder of applicant's 60-foot half of a 120- foot right of way. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential: 37-foot width. Width may be reduced to 33 feet with parking restricted to one side and 29 feet if on -street parking is prohibited provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant makes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the restrictions. 2. Collector: 41-foot width. Collectors consist of Bodega Bay Dr., South Beach Dr., White Cloud Dr. from Spanish Wells to Sandy Point, and Spanish Wells Dr. and Sandy Point Dr. from Bodega Bay to White Cloud. 444 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 2 a' CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 C. CULLS DE SAC 1. Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset); Public - 45-foot radius, Private - 45.5-foot radius. 8. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 10. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 11. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 12. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Jefferson Street - 20 feet. B. Fred Waring Drive - 20 feet. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 13. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 14. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on 445 the approved tentative map.. A PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 15. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 16. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those, properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners 17. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval of this tentative map by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 18. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. 4 4 6 ,j 4. PICHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 20. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 21. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 22. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, at the time of approval of the a map, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 23. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 24. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. 447 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 5 42 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 25. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., *retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the .City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 26. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 27. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 of the LQMC (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation)'are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 448 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 6 i.l CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 29. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. The limits given in this condition are not an entitlement and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 31. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Fugitive Dust Control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 32. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 33. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 34. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. • The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 449 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 35. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual -lot basins or other retention schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2Y2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 36. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 37. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 38. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 39. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Maximum retention depth shall be six feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 40. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leachfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 41. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriffs Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 42. The tract shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water from any well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 43. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 40 PACHRISTI\SP99-04000A.doc Page 8 U 4 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 44. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 45. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 46. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial, Option A) - Construct 51-foot half of a 102-foot improvement including 7-foot half of a 14-foot median, plus six-foot sidewalk. 2. Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial, Option B) - Construct 39-foot westbound travel way (between curbfaces), full 18-foot median (subject to reimbursement for the south half as funds become available), plus eight -foot sidewalk. 3. Traffic Signal at Fred Waring & Jefferson - Necessary modifications to accommodate the improved roadway sections. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential: 36-foot travel width. Width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side and 28 feet with on -street parking prohibited if there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant provides for perpetual enforcement of the restrictions by the homeowners' association. C. CULS DE SAC 2. Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset). Public .Streets: 38-foot curb radius; Private Streets: 45-foot curb radius. 451 PICHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 47. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 48. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 49. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 50. Knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 51. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 52. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5/6.50" PACHRISThSP99-04000A.doc Page 10 45' l CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 53. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 54. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 55. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Fred Waring Entry Drive - Sixty nine -foot divided roadway (between outside curbfaces) centered approximately 690 feet east of the westerly track boundary - Left and right turns in, right turn out. B. Jefferson Street Entry Drive - Sixty nine -foot divided roadway (between outside curbfaces) located at the north end of the tract's Jefferson Street frontage right turns in and out allowed. Left turn in allowed with appropriate median improvements and a right -directed egress drive. LANDSCAPING 56. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 57. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of Myoma Dunes Water District and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved fgr5 3 construction until signed by the City Engineer. 44 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 11 -' �� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 58. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 59. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 60. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 62. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on - site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. 454 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 12 v 4 j CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 FEES AND DEPOSITS 65. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 66. Any Site Development Permit applications submitted to the City for review shall substantially conform to the text and exhibits contained in the Specific Plan. 67. Following City Council review and approval of the Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit amended documents which reflect all the Conditions of Approval included in the City Council's approval. The final Conditions of Approval shall be appended to the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan cover shall be amended to read "Adopted date." Copies of the final document shall be provided to the Community Development Department, City Engineer and City Clerk. 68. The Specific Plan shall be amended to require that only roll -up garage doors shall be allowed for any home in the project area, unless a minimum garage setback of 25 feet is provided. 69. The Specific Plan shall be amended to increase minimum unit size in Planning Area 1 to 1,400 square feet, in conformance with the City's standards. 70. The Specific Plan shall be amended to include the construction of a continuous perimeter wall on the northern and western boundaries of the proposed project. Such a wall shall be of slumpstone or painted block construction, in conformance with City standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Site Development Permit process. 71. The Specific Plan shall be amended both textually and graphically, to allow parking on one side of streets of less than 36 feet in width. Parking may be allowed on both sides of streets of 36 feet or more in width. 72. The Specific Plan shall be amended to include specific recreational amenities, including pools, spas, volleyball and basketball courts, etc. on the elevated portions of retention basins shown on Exhibit H-c, subject to approval of the Community Development Director. 455 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- SPECIFIC PLAN 99-040 - SAND'HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 FIRE DEPARTMENT: 73. Fire hydrants in accordance with CVWD Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm for a two hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 74. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lots. 75. A temporary water supply for fire protection may be allowed for the construction of the model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 76. Gate entrance/exit openings shall be not less than 16 feet in width. All gates shall be located at least 40-feet from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Gates shall be power operated and equipped with a Fire Department override system consisting of Knox Key Operated switches, series KS-2P with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of Knox Company. Gates shall have either a secondary power supply or an approved manual means to release mechanical control of the gate in the event of loss of primary power. 77. Any and all portions of the proposed project shall be subject to the mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 99-389. 456 PACHRISTRSP99-04000A.doc Page 14 U 5 1 RESOLUTION 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF 117 ACRES INTO 379 RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND JEFFERSON STREET. CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 APPLICANT: WADE ELLIS/WARNER ENGINEERING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15th day of February, 2000 hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of a Tentative Tract Map to allow 379 residential lots on 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 14t`' day of December, 1999, 25th day of January, 2000, and 8tn day of February, 2000 held a duly noticed Public Hearings for Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering for review of a Tentative Tract Map to allow 379 residential lots on 117 acres located at the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street, more particularly described as: APNs 609-380-022 and 609-380-023 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1 . The Tentative Tract Map, once annexed to the City, is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan, and the Land Use Map for the General Plan and supports the development of a range of housing opportunities, as conditioned. 2. The Tentative Tract Map will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, as it has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development, and conform with the City's standards and requirements, as conditioned. 3. The Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the City's Zoning Ordinance in that it supports the development of a range of housing in an integrated community. 45'7 CAMy DocumentsUPDOMSP99-040 ccreso TTM.WPD U 5 t"-) City Council Resolution 2000- Tentative Tract Map 29323 4. Development of the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the parcels on which it is proposed, and surrounding land uses as an extension of existing residential uses in the vicinity. The project will be further reviewed through the Site Development Permit process, allowing for use -specific mitigation at that time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby require compliance with the Conditions of Approval for the proposed project; 3. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion that Environmental Assessment 99- 389 assessed the environmental concerns of the Tentative Tract Map; and, 4. That it does approve Tentative Tract Map 29323 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 15th day of February, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: 453 DAWN C. HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California"" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 GENERAL The subdivider agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack,.set aside, void, or annul the approval of this tentative map or any final map thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This tentative map and any final maps thereunder shall comply with the requirements and standards of §§66410 through 66499.58 of the California Government Code (the Subdivision Map Act) and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading, construction or building permit, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: • Fire Marshal • Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Improvement Permit) • Community Development Department • Riverside County Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands -Unified School District • Myoma Dunes Water District • Coachella Valley Water District • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) The applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approval of the plans. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit. For projects requiring project -specific NPDES construction permits, the applicant shall submit a copy of the CWQCB acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent prior to issuance of a grading or site construction permit. The applicant shall ensure that the required Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan is available for inspection at the project site. 459 P1CHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 1 U CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 4. Final maps under this tentative map shall be subject to the provisions of the Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of final map approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 5. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights required of the tentative map or otherwise necessary for construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 6. The applicant shall dedicate or grant public and private street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. 7. Right of way dedications required of this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1. Jefferson Street - The remainder of applicant's 60-foot half of a 120- foot right of way. 2. Fred Waring Drive - The remainder of applicant's 60-foot half of a 120- foot right of way. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential: 37-foot width. Width may be reduced to 33 feet with parking restricted to one side and 29 feet if on -street parking is prohibited provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant makes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the restrictions. 2. Collector: 41-foot width. Collectors consist of Bodega Bay Dr., South Beach Dr., White Cloud Dr. from Spanish Wells to Sandy Point, and Spanish Wells Dr. and Sandy Point Dr. from Bodega Bay to White Cloud. 40 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 2 J J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 C. CULLS DE SAC 1. Public or Private: Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset); Public - 45-foot radius, Private - 45.5-foot radius. 8. Right of way geometry for knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 9. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 10. If the City Engineer determines that access rights to proposed street rights of way shown on the tentative map are necessary prior to approval of final maps dedicating the rights of way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights of way within 60 days of written request by the City. 11. The applicant shall dedicate ten -foot public utility easements contiguous with and along both sides of all private streets. The easements may be reduced to five feet with the express concurrence of IID. 12. The applicant shall create perimeter setbacks along public rights of way as follows (listed setback depth is the average depth if meandering wall design is approved): A. Jefferson Street - 20 feet. B. Fred Waring Drive - 20 feet. The setback requirement applies to all frontage including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements for those purposes. 13. The applicant shall dedicate easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 14. The applicant shall vacate abutter's rights of access to public streets and properties from all frontage along the streets and properties except access points shown on the approved tentative map.. 461 v5i PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 15. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements or written permission, as appropriate, from owners of any abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments are to occur. 16. If the applicant proposes vacation or abandonment of any existing rights of way or access easements which will diminish access rights to any properties owned by others, the applicant shall provide approved alternate rights of way or access easements to those properties or notarized letters of consent from the property owners 17. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval of this tentative map by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAP(S) AND PARCEL MAP(S) 18. Prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete map, as approved by the City's map checker, on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. If the map was not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these conditions of approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 19. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and landscape architects, as appropriate. Plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" media in the categories of "Rough Grading," "Precise Grading," "Streets & Drainage," and "Landscaping." Precise grading plans shall have signature blocks for Community Development Director and the Building Official. All other plans shall have signature blocks for the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for construction until they are signed. "Streets and Drainage" plans shall normally include signals, sidewalks, bike paths, entry drives, gates, and parking lots. "Landscaping" plans shall normally include irrigation improvements, landscape lighting and entry monuments. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls. 462. UO� PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Plans for improvements not listed above shall be in formats approved by the City Engineer. 20. The City may maintain standard plans, details and/or construction notes for elements of construction. For a fee established by City resolution, the applicant may acquire standard plan and/or detail sheets from the City. 21. When final plans are approved by the City, the applicant shall furnish accurate AutoCad files of the complete, approved plans on storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The files shall utilize standard AutoCad menu items so they may be fully retrieved into a basic AutoCad program. At the completion of construction and prior to final acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall update the files to reflect as -constructed conditions. If the plans were not produced in AutoCad or a file format which can be converted to AutoCad, the City Engineer may accept raster -image files of the plans. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 22. Depending on the timing of development of the lots or parcels created by this map and the status of off -site improvements at that time, the subdivider may be required to construct improvements, to reimburse others who construct improvements that are obligations of this map, to secure the cost of the improvements for future construction by others, or a combination of these methods. In the event that any of the improvements required herein are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, at the time of approval of the a map, reimburse the City for the cost of those improvements. 23. The applicant shall construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations, or furnish an executed, secured agreement to construct improvements and/or satisfy obligations required by the City prior to approval of a final map or parcel map or issuance of a certificate of compliance for a waived parcel map. For secured agreements, security provided, and the release thereof, shall conform with Chapter 13, LQMC. Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 24. If improvements are secured, the applicant shall provide estimates of improvement costs for checking and,approval by the City Engineer.. Estimates shall comply with the schedule of unit costs adopted by City resolution or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's schedule, estimates shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. 463 PICHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 5 5 71 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies. Security is not required for telephone, gas, or T.V. cable improvements. However, development -wide improvements shall not be agendized for final acceptance until the City receives confirmation from the telephone authority that the applicant has met all requirements for telephone service to lots within the development. 25. If improvements are phased with multiple final maps or other administrative approvals (e.g., Site Development Permits), off -site improvements and common improvements (e.g., retention basins, perimeter walls & landscaping, gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first phase unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each phase shall be completed and satisfied prior to completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the phase and subsequent phases unless a construction phasing plan is approved by the City Engineer. 26. If the applicant fails to construct improvements or satisfy obligations in a timely manner or as specified in an approved phasing plan or in an improvement agreement, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits or final building inspections,. withhold other approvals related to the development of the project or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 27. This development shall comply with Chapter 8.11 of the LQMC (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall furnish a preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report and an approved grading plan prepared by a qualified engineer. The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on final maps (if any are required of this development) that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 464 P:\CHRISTI\SP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 6 05 J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 29. Slopes shall not exceed 5:1 within public rights of way and 3:1 in landscape areas outside the right of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall endeavor to minimize differences in elevation at abutting properties and between separate tracts and lots within this development. Building pad elevations on contiguous lots shall not differ by more than three feet except for lots within a tract or parcel map, but not sharing common street frontage, where the differential shall not exceed five feet. The limits given in this condition are not an entitlement and more restrictive limits may be imposed in the map approval or plan checking process. If compliance with the limits is impractical, however, the City will consider alternatives which minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 31. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Fugitive Dust Control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.16, LQMC. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 32. The applicant shall maintain graded, undeveloped land to prevent wind and water erosion of soils. The land shall be planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 33. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide building pad certifications stamped and signed by qualified engineers or surveyors. For each pad, the certification shall list the approved elevation, the actual elevation, the difference between the two, if any, and pad compaction. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Engineering Bulletin No. 97.03 and the following: 34. Stormwater falling on site during the peak 24-hour period of a 100-year storm (the design storm) shall be retained within the development unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 46 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 7 0 V 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 35. Stormwater shall normally be retained in common retention basins. Individual -lot basins or other retertion schemes may be approved by the City Engineer for lots 2Y2 acres in size or larger or where the use of common retention is impracticable. If individual -lot retention is approved, the applicant shall meet the individual -lot retention provisions of Chapter 13.24, LQMC. 36. Storm flow in excess of retention capacity shall be routed through a designated, unimpeded overflow outlet to the historic drainage relief route. 37. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be retained on site or passed through to the overflow outlet. 38. Retention facility design shall be based on site -specific percolation data which shall be submitted for checking with the retention facility plans. The design percolation rate shall not exceed two inches per hour. 39. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. Maximum retention depth shall be six feet for common basins and two feet for individual -lot retention. 40. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. In residential developments, nuisance water shall be disposed of in a trickling sand filter and leachfield approved by the City Engineer. The sand filter and leachfield shall be designed to contain surges of 3 gph/1,000 sq. ft. (of landscape area) and infiltrate 5 gpd/1,000 sq. ft. 41. In developments for which security will be provided by public safety entities (e.g., the La Quinta Safety Department or the Riverside County Sheriffs Department), retention basins shall be visible from adjacent street(s). No fence or wall shall be constructed around basins unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 42. The tract shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water from any well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. UTILITIES 43. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within the right of way and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electrical vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 466 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 44. Existing aerial lines within or adjacent to the proposed development and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. Power lines exceeding 34.5 kv are exempt from this requirement. 45. Utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing, improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of trench compaction for approval of the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 46. The applicant shall install the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses. (Public street improvements shall conform with the City's General Plan in effect at the time of construction.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Jefferson Street (Major Arterial, Option A) - Construct 51-foot half of a 102-foot improvement including 7-foot half of a 14-foot median, plus six-foot sidewalk. 2. Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial, Option B) - Construct 39-foot westbound travel way (between curbfaces), full 18-foot median (subject to reimbursement for the south half as funds become available), plus eight -foot sidewalk. 3. Traffic Signal at Fred Waring & Jefferson - Necessary modifications to accommodate the improved roadway sections. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1. Residential: 36-foot travel width. Width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side and 28 feet with on -street parking prohibited if there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors and the applicant provides for perpetual enforcement of the restrictions by the homeowners' association. C. CULS DE SAC 2. Use Riverside County Standard 800 (symmetric) or 800A (offset). Public Streets: 38-foot curb radius; Private Streets: 45-foot curb radius. 467 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 9 t 62. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, turn knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features contained in the approved construction plans may warrant additional street widths as determined by the City Engineer. 47. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 48. The applicant may be required to extend improvements beyond development boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 49. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC, adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 50. Knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. . 51. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations which convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue for street sweeping. If a wedge curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be vertical (1/8" batter) and a minimum of 0.1' in height. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to normal curbing prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 52. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using Caltrans' design procedure (20-year life) and site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows (or approved equivalents for alternate materials): Residential & Parking Areas 3.0" a.c./4.50" c.a.b. Collector 4.0"/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.5"/6.50" 468 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 10 A 4-, t��if CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 53. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 54. The City will conduct final inspections of homes and other habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the tract or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. 55. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Fred Waring Entry Drive - Sixty nine -foot divided roadway (between outside curbfaces) centered approximately 690 feet east of the westerly track boundary - Left and right turns in, right turn out. B. Jefferson Street Entry Drive - Sixty nine -foot divided roadway (between outside curbfaces) located at the north end of the tract's Jefferson Street frontage right turns in and out allowed. Left turn in allowed with appropriate median improvements and a right -directed egress drive. LANDSCAPING 56. The applicant shall provide landscaping in required setbacks, retention basins, common lots, and park areas. 57. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. The applicant shall submit plans for approval by the Community Development Department prior to plan checking by the Public Works Department. When plan checking is complete, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of Myoma Dunes Water District and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner prior to submitting for signature by the City Engineer. Plans are not approved for4 6 construction until signed by the City Engineer. PACHRISThSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323 - SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 58. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 18 inches of curbs along public streets. PUBLIC SERVICES 59. The applicant shall provide public, transit improvements as required by Sunline Transit and approved by the City Engineer. QUALITY ASSURANCE 60. The applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 61. The applicant shall employ or retain qualified civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, surveyors, or other appropriate professionals to provide sufficient construction supervision to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings. 62. The applicant shall arrange and bear the cost of measurement, sampling and testing procedures not included in the City's inspection program but required by the City as evidence that construction materials and methods comply with plans, specifications and applicable regulations. 63. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all public improvement plans which were signed by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As - Constructed" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. The applicant shall revise the CAD or raster -image files previously submitted to the City to reflect as -constructed conditions. MAINTENANCE 64. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous, perpetual maintenance of all on - site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant shall maintain required public improvements until expressly released from this responsibility by the appropriate public agency. 474 PACHRISTRSP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 12 tj CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2000-_ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 29323.- SAND HARBOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FEBRUARY 15, 2000 FEES AND DEPOSITS 65. The applicant shall pay the City's established fees for plan checking and construction inspection. Fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan checking and permits. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 66. Following City Council review and approval of the Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit amended documents which reflect all the Conditions of Approval included in the City Council's approval. The final Conditions of Approval shall be appended to the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan cover shall be amended to read "Adopted date." Copies of the final document shall be provided to the Community Development Department, City Engineer and City Clerk. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 67. Fire hydrants in accordance with CVWD Standard W-33 shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm for a two hour duration at 20 psi. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in the middle of streets directly in line with fire hydrants. 68. The required water system including fire hydrants will be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lots. 69. A temporary water supply for fire protection may be allowed for the construction of the model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 70. Gate entrance/exit openings shall be not less than 16 feet in width. All gates shall be located at least 40-feet from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Gates shall be power operated and equipped with a Fire Department override system consisting of Knox Key Operated switches, series KS-2P with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of Knox Company. Gates shall have either a secondary power supply or an approved manual means to release mechanical control of the gate in the event of loss of primary power. 71. Any and all portions of the proposed project shall be subject to the mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 99-389. 471 P:\CHRISTI\SP99-040-TT29323 COA.wpd Page 13 U ATTACHMENT 1 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 3. Commissioner Butler asked staff where they would want a clip d gable added. Staff stated that instead of having a hip roof, the gable oof would continue out and be clipped on the ends on one of the plans. ommissioner Butler stated he was opposed to the clipped gable roof and t ought there was enough detail as proposed. 4. Mr. Roger Moore, with Canady and Company, state e had nothing to add and concurred with staffs recommendation. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked if the Homeowners' Association had reviewed and approved the plans. Mr. Moore stated t ey had approved the plans. 6. There being no further discussion, airman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing opened the issue for Commission discussion. 7. There being no discussion, it w moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to ado/P�evnnit99 t Planni Commission Resolution 99-085 approving Site Development 1, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as recomROLL CALL: AYES: CoAbels, Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOBSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. D. Site Development PermA 99-653 Amendment #1; a request of Forrest Haag for KSL Land Corporation for pproval of revised site, architectural and landscaping plans for golf course mainte ce facility for the property located on the north side of Airport Boulzandthe en Madison Street and Monroe Street within the Norman Golf Cour 1. rmed the Commission that the applicant had requested a e to January 11, 2000, to allow them time to redesign the building configuration. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Robbins/Tyler to continue this item to January 11, 2000. Unanimously approved. E. Environmental Assessment 99-389, General Plan Amendment 99-064, Zone Change 99-092 Specific Plan 99-040. and Tentative Tract Man 29323; a request of Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering requesting Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, approval of a Pre -Annexation General Plan Designation from County Designation 2b (2-5 units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 units per acre), Zone Change from County Designation of r-1-9000 to Low Density Residential, a Specific Plan for development standards and design 4) U U CAMy Documents\WPD0CS\PC12-14-99.wpd 8 472 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 guidelines for a residential development; and Tentative Tract Map to allow '379 residential units on 117 acres, to be located on the northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. 1. Chairman Kirk opened the public hearing and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Robbins asked about the condition for a north boundary wall. Staff stated the condition should be Condition #70 of the Specific Plan. 3. Commissioner Abels stated the lots appear to be 4,500 square feet on the map and not 4,800 as stated in the staff report. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated there are some lots that are larger which create a higher average, but the majority are 4,500 square feet. 4. Commissioner Butler stated he agrees that the average lot size is 4,800 square feet is misleading as most of the lots are 4,500 square feet. 5. Commissioner Tyler asked for clarification on the entrances as staff had stated they would be allowed a right out and the staff report states it will have a left turn in at both driveways. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated the Public Works Department has indicated a left turn in would be allowed at both entrances. Commissioner Tyler suggested Condition #55.A. contain the same wording as Condition #55.B relative to the right turn out. Senior Engineer Steve Speer stated that on Jefferson Street the City will only have a half median as the City only controls half of the street. On Fred Waring Drive the City can construct a full median. That is why the right directed egress drive is not required. The City will be able to get the hook turn in the median and it will be a positive barrier in that regard. Whereas on Jefferson Street there .is a need to get the cars going right far enough as the City will only have a half median. Discussion followed as to how the City would build a half median. Commissioner Tyler asked if there was an opportunity to recover some of the cost (Condition #46.A.) of the signals at Fred Waring Drive and Jefferson Street. Staff stated there was none. 6. Chairman Kirk asked if this area was within the City's Sphere of Influence. Community Development Director Jerry Herman stated it was not. 7. Chairman Kirk asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission. Mr. Mike Smith, Warner Engineering representing the applicant, stated the only concern they were hearing from the Commission was in regard to the CAMy Documents\WPD0CS\PC12-14-99.wpd 9 47 3 U '" 9 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 smaller lot sizes. The first project layout for this site had been for a commercial corner and staff rejected this plan. The lot sizes were determined from a market study. The tract was previously approved with over 400 lots of the same size and they could not find a builder to build it so they conducted a survey to see what the demand was and this was the result. In regard to the amenities, the developer would rather wait to let the builders determine what they want. They would like to request deletion of Condition #72 and allow the Homeowners' Association to decide what they want and what they want to pay for. 8. Commissioner Tyler asked what the strip of land was between their project and Jefferson Street. Mr. Smith stated it belonged to Christine Clarke and it was not economically possible to purchase the property for the few lots that could be developed on it. It could be used as an open space retention basin for the property to the north. Commissioner Tyler stated there would be a sidewalk to nowhere until the property to the north is developed. He then asked for an explanation of the emergency exits. Mr. Smith stated there is an existing road at the west end that dead ends. They will put their road through and construct a Fire Marshal crash gate as an extra gate and on the well site there is an opportunity to gate both ends and the Fire Marshal could go through the well site. Commissioner Tyler stated that off Fred Waring Drive at Port Maria, which is a gated entrance, it will require approval from the Bermuda Dunes Country Club. Mr. Smith stated the road exists and should not require any approval from the Bermuda Dunes Country Club. 9. Commissioner Butler stated that in Planning Area 1, the City's minimum lot size is 7,200 square feet and he does not like the smaller lot size. He does like the project and the concept. If the lots were 7,200 square feet there would be no issue. Commissioner Butler stated his concern was that once the lot sizes are approved, the developer no longer has a concern or control, it is then up to the individual merchant builders. 10. Mr. Chuck McKeown, 1782 The Woods Drive, San Diego, speaking for the applicant, stated that when this project was initially put together it was when the City was suffering under the depression of 1982. They had 400 lots all the same size and could not obtain financing for so they had to come up with an alternative plan. They designed the program for a number of users that are not being satisfied by the current market. The lot size of 4,500 square feet was selected to keep the homes small for people who are either single men or women, who want security, ease of care, maintenance of the home as well as for retirees. They are across the street from US Homes and less than a mile from Sun City and many of the people they will attract do not want to pay the high association fees and do not care about the recreational amenities C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\PC 12-14-99.wpd 10 67,n �u 4�� Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 of a golf course. He went on to give a history of the development in the area. Finally, they will have CC& R's contained in their architectural guidelines to control what is built. 11. Commissioner Abels stated a merchant developer could purchase the whole project without any stipulations. Mr. McKeown stated the square footage and architectural standards will be stipulated. Commissioner Abels stated his biggest concern is the small lots and the type of builder that will build on them. Mr. McKeown stated they contemplated having a senior project and found that most people do not want to be in a senior project only. They would follow any conditions the City would like to place on the project to maintain the guidelines desired. The starting price range for the zero lot homes should be $150,000 up to about $185,000. The higher end houses should start at about $225,000 up to $300,000 based on the market projections today. 12. Commissioner Abels stated his concern was that with the smaller lots there is nothing in place to prevent a builder from building a less than desirable project. Mr. McKeown stated they originally thought about have a senior project, but have since found out that projects that are senior restricted are beginning to suffer because people do not want to be in an age restricted project. They would appreciate any recommendations the Commission or staff could give them regarding guidelines to keep the integrity of the project. 13. Mr. Warren Bachtel, 42-645 St. George Drive, Bermuda Dunes, a member of the Annexation Committee for the Bermuda Dunes Council, stated they were not opposed to the project, but are opposed to piece -meal annexing of the area at the request of a property owner. The City needs to annex the entire Bermuda Dunes area, or none of it. He thought they should appear at this time and let the City know they are in the process of making application to the County to remain a County Community of Interest. 14. Commissioner Tyler stated the City is not out soliciting annexation of this area. It is responding to property owners for annexing. Mr. Bachtel stated they are aware of this as they have maintained communication with the City. They want to remain a viable area and be annexed as a whole and not piece- meal. 15. Mr. Jay Steele, 79-745 Kingston Drive, which backs up to this project, stated he had no objection to the project. He currently is serving on the Fact Finding Committee for the Bermuda Dunes area to determine what the residents of Bermuda Dunes want. The residents have made it clear that they do not want to be piece-mealed apart. They would therefore ask the Planning CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC12-14-99.wpd 11 47 ) Q ! .1, Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 Commission to postpone annexation of this area until such time as they have an opportunity to finish their fact-finding study to determined what the will of the residents is and then they can approach the appropriate city for annexation. 16. Commissioner Abels stated this Commission has nothing to do with the annexation. The Planning Commission will only review the validity of this proj ect. 17. There being no further discussion, Chairman Kirk closed the public participation portion of the hearing and opened the issue for Commission discussion. 18. Commissioner Tyler stated he was disappointed by the quality, or lack thereof, of the Specific Plan document itself. Planning Area I does not measure up to the lifestyle of La Quinta. He does not believe a lot of conscious effort went into the development of the document as some of the information is outdated. He generally likes two-thirds of the plan, however he does not believe they should lower the City's design standards for the purpose of annexation of any parcel. The minimum requirement is established by the RC Code which defines the lot sizes and setbacks and should be applied to Planning Area I of this proposal. An area that should be responded to is the safety of the City's school children to provide turnouts not only for Sunline, but school buses and seniors. The reference to Coachella Valley Water District should be changed to Myoma Dunes Water District. He likes the open space and retention basins. Most gated communities have a restriction regarding the parking of recreational vehicles, the Specific Plan states it will rely on the City's requirements. This will not work on the smaller lots. He suggested they designate an area for "RV" parking. 19. Commissioner Butler stated he concurred with Commissioner Tyler's statements as he too has a problem with the smaller lots and cannot agree that zero lot lines for 132 units will make it any better of a project. The absorption on the smaller units has not proven to be true on the projects he is aware of. Zero lot lines does not make him feel any better about the project. Having lots of 7,200 square feet does not detract from what they are trying to achieve within their project. If the applicant would make these corrections, he would have no objection. 20. Commissioner Robbins stated he concurred with what has been stated. He can understand the developers plan, but as a Commissioner he is not here to just approve something to sell, but to protect the community and what the v CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC12-14-99.wpd 12 t 47 6 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 community stands for. Therefore, he cannot support the lots as designed. He does not see enough controls written into the Specific Plan that would guarantee the type of development they are proposing. 21. Commissioner Abels stated he too agrees with the statements made by the other Commissioners. 22. Chairman Kirk stated he too agreed with the statements made, but also agrees that one third of the project is not acceptable. He didn't review the remainder of the project due to the concerns raised on the one third. A zero lot line could be a good project if developed with a golf course or other recreational amenities and that is not occurring here. He would like to hear from the developer in regard to the two options that appear to be before the Commission; rejecting the project as proposed and let the City Council address it; or have the applicant come back and respond to the issues raised by the Commission. 23. Commissioner Tyler asked if the applicant could also take into consideration the contours of the site and develop the project to retain some of the contours. 24. Mr. Mike Smith stated they did try to retain some of the contours with the use of the retention basins. They could also increase the size of the lots, but it would defeat the purpose of the project as the market they are trying to reach do not want that amount of yard to maintain. 25. Commissioner Tyler asked staff to verify that the RC Zone required 7,200 square feet. Staff stated that for Low Density Residential yes and for Medium Density Residential it is 5,000 square foot lots. They are proposing a Zone Change to Low Density Residential, but it is the Specific Plan that allows them a certain density and they are within that density requirement. The overall density fits the Low Density Residential averaged over the entire site, but not by Planning Areas. 26. Chairman Kirk asked if the minimum lot requirement for Low Density Residential was 7,200 square feet. Staff stated that was true, but this project is applying under a Specific Plan which gives them flexibility to have varying lot sizes. 27. Commissioner Butler asked if there was a method of approving the project with a stipulation that Planning Area I meet the standards they are looking for. Planning Consultant Nicole Criste stated Planning Area I could be conditioned to be consistent with Planning Area II which would bring Planning Area I to City standards in a Low Density Residential designation. She then asked for clarification regarding the lot size, as to whether C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\PC12-14-99.wpd 13 477 I Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1999 Commissioner Butler found the other exceptions to City standards in Planning Area I acceptable or should all of the City's standards for single family development on 7,200 square foot lots be applied. Commissioner Butler stated that if they increase the lot sizes to 7,200 square feet, then the Commission does not need to be concerned because the other issues become mute. Planning Consultant Criste stated that was not true. If you raise the lot size only, the Specific Plan still governs. The way the Specific Plan is written, the recommendation needs to state that it meets all City standards for the RL District. Chairman Kirk recessed the meeting at 9:35 p.m. and reconvened at 9:40 p.m. 28. Mr. Smith stated they would like to request a continuance, but at the same time they would like to know what the objection is to the zero lot line and smaller lot sizes. Can they work with staff to resolve the objections. 29. Chairman Kirk stated the lot size is the problem. The zero lot line is not an issue; they should be paired with amenities of some kind. 30. Commissioner Tyler stated that the City started with 50 X 100 foot lots and the Cove is an example of what can happen with the smaller lot sizes. The City has progressed beyond this and now has a minimum 7,200 square foot lot size and he would hesitate to go backwards. 31. Commissioner Butler stated that with the smaller lots and no amenities, the developer has no control over what will happen down the road. To protect the City he would propose staying with the minimum 7,200 square foot lot. Mr. Smith stated they would have to give up the open space and incorporate more houses. 32. Chairman Kirk stated that it would be better to weave medium density into the community. 33. Commissioner Robbins stated that with some amenities he could be convinced to go with the smaller lots. 34. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Tyler/Robbins to continue this application to January 25, 2000. Unanimously approved. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: None VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: CAMy Documents\WPD0CS\PC12-14-99.wpd 14 �•, tJ7� ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 2000 emergency exit and the need for the City to work with them to come up with a solution. With 50 homes it is simple, but with 300 there is a need for access and exits. They do understand the exit that is used for construction is not a viable at it is near a corner, but there could be a right turn at this location. They also understand that the exit onto Calle Tampico could be a dangerous left/right turn, but could be a right turn to separate the traffic which needs to be done. They are working with the project to make -it work fo., everyone, but will make a more formal presentation at the nextarsng. 9. Th� Ring no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Cotni€ s oners AbelsButler to continue the public hearing on Tentative Patel Map 29613 to February 22, 2000. Unanimously approved. 99,4092. Specific Plan 99-040. and Tentative Tract Map 29323; a request of Wade Ellis/Warner Engineering requesting Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, approval of a Pre -Annexation General Plan Designation from County Designation 2b (2-5 units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2-4 units per acre), Zone Change from County Designation of r-1-9000 to Low Density Residential, a Specific Plan for development standards and design guidelines for a residential development; and Tentative Tract Map to allow 379 residential units on 117 acres, to be located on the northwest corner of Fred Wari Drive and Jefferson Street. t 1 V-5 C:\My Documents\WPDOCS\PC2-8-20.wpd 3 479, Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 2000 1. Chairman Kirk informed everyone that the public hearing was open and asked for the staff report. Planning Manager Christine di Iorio presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. City Attorney Dawn Honeywell clarified that staff was not ;nding the larger lot size, this was a requirement of the Planning Commissioner Robbins agreed that Laguna de la Paz has the smaller lots, but it also has extensive amenities that this project does not have. Therefore, by eliminating Condition #72 it is not the same project. Without the amenities there is nothing to balance the allowance of the smaller lots. Mr. Smith stated there is enough room to add these amenities if the property owners want them. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC2-8-20.wpd 4 7 i1 - 480 Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 2000 6. Chairman Kirk stated that he did not know of any homeowners' association that has come back after the master developer has completed the project and added the amenities. Mr. Smith stated that Laguna de la Paz has just upgraded their amenities. If the homeowners want them, they will build them. 7. Commissioner Abels stated the lots at Laguna de la Paz werq,E:built before the current City standards. Mr. Smith stated thezshow they were constructed in 1990. 9. Chairman Kirk questioned why a section of the project was not being required to provide a block wall on the northeastern boundary. Mr. Smith stated the project was gated and it would have a wall completely surrounding the project. Planning Consultant Nicole Crist clarified the Specific Plan will require the integration of existing walls to provide a continuous wall. 19i 7 r.w 7 CANly Documents\WPDOCS\PC2-8-20.wpd 5 481 Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 2000 Chairman Kirk stated that his concern was that as the condition read, it would only cover two and a half of the sides of the project. Staff stated that was because the Specific Plan does specify walls on the other two sides of the proj ect. 10. Commissioner Abels asked what would happen if the City did not annex the area. Mr. Smith stated it would be processed through Riverside County. It is the owners preference to be annexed into La Qu to `l e precedent had been set by the areas to the west and the no of Fred Waring that already had been annexed into the C:" 15. Ccirn XUioner Butler stated he understands the applicant believes there is a In �- br the smaller houses, but he sees it turning into a rental property as investments for people. You are trying to accommodate the seasonal buyer and his concern is what happens to that property for the remainder of the season. The market in the north La Quinta area is absorbing slowly the individuals wanting the smaller house, but they are not lining up to get into a gated community. He could not support it unless it is brought up to at least the minimum City standards. If the applicant does not want to upgrade the lot sizes nor provide the amenities, and even though there is space provided to allow for those amenities in the future, they are shown on the map as retention basins. The way it is presented he cannot support it. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC2-8-20.wpd 6 A2 48rj, Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 2000 16. Commissioner Robbins stated he concurs with what has been stated. Rather than single family homes this project should have been condominiums with units of 1,400 square feet. There would not have been any issues. It isn't different than a condominium project. The problem he has is the absolute lack of amenities that should go with this project. He could potentially support the project with an amenity package. Otherwise with the smaller lots and no amenities he cannot support it. 17. Commissioner Abels stated he coulc riot suppa#�°Yt T the changes were ii made according to the recommends#,.? he coin# „supported it. Mrr Smith suggested approving the prop with sta£`irecoded condit*s. 3ripm, q fie believes this would be a black mark on Lpotir1e'"as it is situated at the entrance to La Quints. reed to'"me community facilities it would be a plus. He that this is not an application the Commission should :r`bles stated he is concerned that the Commission had given the opportunity to revise the plan and they have declined to do moved and seconded by Commissioners Abels/Butler to recommend the project as submitted. CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Butler, Robbins, Tyler, and Chairman Kirk. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. CAMy Documents\WPDOCS\PC2-8-20.wpd 7 �j