Loading...
1988 06 15 TTC Minutes MEMORANDUM cinr of u- nuiNTa TO: Ron L. Kiedrowski, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: June 22, 1988 SUBJECT: Technical Traffic Committee The regular meeting of the Technical Traffic Committee was held at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 15, 1988. Present were: Members: Sgt. Betty Beyer, Sheriff's Department Roger Hirdler, City of La Quinta Dick Barrera, Riverside County Ron Friedli, Sheriff's Department Gene Marshall, Caltrans, San Diega Frank Reynolds, City of La Quinta Staff: Bob Weddle, City Project Engineer Jerry Coffey. City of La Quinta Old Business: Speed Survey - Mr. Reynolds reported on the results of the traffic speed survey, indicating that t:he matter had been taken to the City Council for a revision to the existing ordinance which would enable speed limits to be set by resolution. Traffic Study - 50th and Park Avenues. Draft copies of the report were distributed. It was noted that the study indicated that access to Lot 194 in the Duna La Quinta tract would not be a problem an<i that a signal at 50th and Park will be required when the demand arises. Mr. Reynolds outl::ned the developments which will affect the intersection the continued expansion of the school and sports complex facilities, the subdivision, the expansion of the La Quinta Hotel, and the construction of a hotel at PGA West. TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 22, 1988 PAGE 2 Mr. Barrera said that perhaps now is the tirne: to put in the signal, but Mr. Reynolds questioned tkie lack of warrants and informed the group that the subdivision will be for lot sales, with the result that it would be at least two or three years before buildout. Mr. Barrera asked if the Cit!,~ has a Signal Mitigation Fee and was informed that we do not - we have the infrastructure Fee. Jefferson and 50th. - At the May committee meeting we were advised by Mr. Cantu that the County was reviewing the situation at this intersection and would be coming to this meeting with a recommendation. Apparently there was a communications problem because Mr. Barrera was unaware of any review by the County. He said he'd provide a response within two weeks. New Business: Washington and 52nd. Mr. Reynolds explained that subsequent to the development of the accident pin map the City Council directed the staff to "prioritize" intersections, with the idea of developing mitigation measures. As noted in the May committee meeting the initial one to be looked at is Washington and 52nd. A video tape depicting the approaches to the intersection from all three legs was shown and the existing traffic control devices and markings were pointed out. The ensuing discussion brought out two significant factors. First, of the 16 accidents which have occurred at this intersection in the past three years, ten have taken place during hours of darkness. Second, the most common cause of the accidents was failure to yield the right of way. As a result the discussion led to the suggestion that illuminating the intersection may be of benefit. Both the County and Caltrans have established warrants to justify lighting, and Mr. Marshall and Mr. Barrera agreed to furnish the City with. copies of those warrants. Upon their receipt the situation will be evaluated. engttc.m6 ~I,~I~,. TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 22, 1986 PAGE 3 ~'II With respect to the failures to yield, this intersection was likened to the intersec;t.ion of Monterey and Frank Sinatra in the Rancho Mirage - Palm Desert area, a high incident intersection where it is felt that Frank Sinatra traffic misjudges speeds on Monterey. It was suggested that: perhaps the addition of a sign be added to the Washington stop sign which says Cross Traffic Does pilot Stop" would be helpful. It was noted that this type of sign presently exists on 52nd at Monroe and :Jackson. There was also some discussion about replacing the present dead end signage with barrier rail:> in an attempt to make the condition more app+srent to southbound Washington traffic. City staff wall take these suggestions under advisement and .implement those which do not require Council action. Obregon - The problem, as outlined by Mr. Reynolds, is that a) complaints have been received from citizens regarding the proliferation of stop signs on Obregon and 2) Sunline has requested that most of them be removed since this street is their northbound route through the Cove. The City Council referred the matter to the Committee for a recommendation. Mr. Reynolds gave a brief summary of how things got the way they are. For many years there were no stop signs in the Cove, and Obregon, Eisenhower and Bermudas were the primary north-south thoroughfares. Several years ago the City Council went through a formal designation of "through" streets, Obregon was one of them. Subsequently, due to speeding complaints from residents along Obregon, the Council determined that all east-west streets and Eisenhower and Bermudas should be "through" streets, except that the east-west streets would have stops at Montezuma, Obregon, Eisenhower and Bermudas. This has had the effect of maN:ing every intersection on Obregon a 4-way stop. engttc.m6 ~,~;~~;r TECHNICAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 22, 1988 PAGE 4 I ~~I;~~ A video tape was shown of Obregon throughout rtiost of its length, and it was apparent that whi:Le~ in the upper Cove it looks like any other north-south street, in its lower reaches it gives the appearance of being narrower because of fewer vacant lots and encroachments of vegetation, fences, rock borders, etc. In some cases these could give rise to sight distance problems at certain intersections were Obregon to be opened up to through traffic. Mr. Barrera stated that if the Council considers it to be a collector street, then it slhould be designated as a "through" street and the stop signs removed. However, the circulation element of the General Plan does not show it as a collector. Mr. Reynolds noted that Obregon fits the definition in the Vehicle Code as a residential street and is posted accordingly for 25 mph. However, he has confirmed with the Sheriff's Department that if it were to be redesignated as a through street and the stop signs removed, the 25 mph could not be enforced with radar in the absence of an engineering and traffic survey. He expressed the opinion that if the stop signs were removed, a speed survey would probably determine that a minimum 35 m.ph would represent the 85th percentile. Zt was the consensus of the members of the Committee that the decision to remove stop signs or allow them to remain does not involve technical considerations. Therefore, since it is k~eyond the purview of this committee, a recommendation can not be made. FR/lmm engttc.m6