The URL can be used to link to this page

2011 02 01 CCCity Council agendas are available on the City's web page @ www.la-quinta.org CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Special Meeting TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2011 2:30 P.M. Closed Session / 4:00 P.M. Open Session Beginning Resolution No. 2011-007 Ordinance No. 486 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Council Members: Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, and Mayor Adolph PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CLOSED SESSION — NONE RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. J� City Council Agenda 1 February 1, 2011 PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATIONS — NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — NONE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 18, 2011 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1 . APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2011. 2. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 485, ADOPTING THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 2. 3. ACCEPTANCE OF ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRACT MAP 31202-1, RANCHO SANTANA, DESERT CHEYENNE, INC. 4. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE OFFSITE AND ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR AMENDED TRACT MAP 31732, PALIZADA, KB HOME COASTAL, INC. 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE OFFSITE AND ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR AMENDED TRACT MAP 31733, PALIZADA, KB HOME COASTAL, INC. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF JEFFERSON STREET PARKWAY LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2009-16B. City Council Agenda 2 February 1, 2011 0i 0 2 7. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 2010 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE. 8. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROVISIONS IN THE STATE BUDGET PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF PARTIAL FUNDING FOR AN ADOPTION SERVICES COORDINATOR POSITION AT THE COACHELLA VALLEY ANIMAL CAMPUS. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD SECTION 11 .73.060 (LOCKED STORAGE) TO CHAPTER 11.73. A. TAKE UP ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING 4. CONSIDERATION OF TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE CIVIC CENTER ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION 5. CONSIDERATION OF EARLY REPAYMENT OF THE LOANS FROM THE CITY OF LA QUINTA TO THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION City Council Agenda 3 February 1, 2011 STUDY SESSION - NONE REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (FRANKLIN) 2. BOB HOPE CLASSIC FUND DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE (ADOLPH) 3. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 5. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (HENDERSON) 6. C.V. CONSERVATION COMMISSION (SNIFF) 7. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (ROBERT COX) 8. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (FRANKLIN) 9. C.V.W.D. JOINT WATER POLICY COMMITTEE (ADOLPH) 10. IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE (FRANKLIN) 11. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (FRANKLIN) 12. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON) 13. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORT COMMUNITIES CONVENTION & VISITORS AUTHORITY (EVANS) 14. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (NANCY DORIA) 15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DIANE GUNN) 16. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 17. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH) 18. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 8, 2010 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 5. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 6. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 7. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT A. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 9. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT - NONE CID 04 City Council Agenda 4 February 1, 2011 MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS — NONE RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING NO PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE SCHEDULED, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL ADJOURN AND NOT RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. UNLESS THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE AFTERNOON SESSION THAT HAVE NOT BEEN CONSIDERED 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. PRESENTATIONS — NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS — NONE ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on February 15, 2011, commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. 01-35 City Council Agenda 5 February 1, 2011 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Veronica Montecino, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of February 1, 2011, was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas and 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on January 28, 2011. DATE . January 28, 20111 VERONICA . MONTECINO, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7103, twenty- four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777- 7103. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. V 6 City Council Agenda 6 February 1, 2011 T Fc&t,, 4 U 5 CFhI OF �9sG COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register Dated February 1, 2011 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Demand Register Dated February 1, 2011 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 90365 - 90414} 152,402.89 90415 - 90440} 284,638.43 Voids} (5,321.48) Wire Transfers} 202,798.97 P/R 36265 - 36271 220,080.82 P/R Tax Transfers} 62,028.87 Payable Warrants: 90441-905521 1,624,097.68 $2,540,726.18 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash -City $2,415,551.67 Demand of Cash -RDA $125,174.51 Demand of Cash - HA $0.00 3ohn M. Falconer, Finance Director AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION PUBLIC HEARING 0107 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 1/11111 - 1/25/11 1/11/11 WIRE TRANSFER -TASC 1/20/11 WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 1/21/11 WIRE TRANSFER -ICMA 1121111 WIRE TRANSFER -PERS 1/21/11 WIRE TRANSFER -LQCEA $1,378.57 $124,805.97 $21,860.75 $54,591.18 $162.50 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFER OUT $202,798.97 w O N z Z : N O W r yraO r a ❑ar d .�z � LLQ � W 2 o 00 O O O m m ON N m y O O o O O O o O O O O Of� M O O Itl 1f1 Oaf l(1 MOMONbtiMOP-. ... .VMm M 1I1 I!I e o o Nor o .�N N.-r IfIPMNObP�tNPMbtiO ti wz r O O 1� r O O Imo b O O P P �1 M OrIN MbPorrNOObN.+.•r .1 MIS O O UO � O o O o O O O .y P O O O M O .i lI1 b N ti N O N 0 W f � y J Q J Q J Q J 6 J Q C J Q W W J J Q a U W F 1' r W W f F+ O f W W W f d O x O £ O O W W O O N O LL LL 0 a £ H £ H £ H LLLL H £ F• H ZZ H y U d 0 H K U w w w zz w w K rZ i d' 00 w d wwow U w Z: d w O O d O '+ H O d O J O N N O W W❑ W d N 0 ❑ J ❑ d 0 0 ££ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ FH ❑ Ur um oz NZ Z z U 2 F- z ❑❑ z f Z H 2 QQ Z O WW<< U❑ J U U W F r £ w N W £ w a Q W £ w z W w U' W U❑ U U U U U U£ N J 3 U >> > Q p £d r N > 0 > 0 > > N > W > Hry > > »»» >>Z N N >N Z £ w C £ ❑ „ N Z dv fK i J HH 6•+ riU d' \ K 00 W WNWW WWWWPP PI�W W W W W W d\ N W x W H Sx F 2 » F-aft-rHf F-auxxHl-rF-rH Qti W l f a U m a t-r a a ww awaaaaaal-��raaaaQa p W ❑� 3 Q 3 �� 3 '� ❑O 3N333333NNNN333333 d' OLL b1 M r1 M 00 M O Oo ❑ N ZQ M v 'rP vv�t �Tvv�tvv�ty VAT �t'�ivv�t W M M Om M M MN M P MM X M b O Off} ltl l[1 WIfl N I11 N.�NNNNMMMMMM w V NM v N NO vet v�tv vet �. vet �. vet �. .. V �T . . NIII 1111I11I1 IIIb OIl1 I11mP�vvvvv r O O OO O 0 O 0 Oo op 00000000 NI111I1 IfIo00000 Z o 0 0 00 p o 0 o p o 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 o p o 0 o p o o p 0 o o 0 b 0 O o O O Ob MMMMMMMIlI Ifl lf11f1Wrrrrrr OZ, O MOM Q N o N U o o N o p o 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o N Z ❑ O N ❑ .r .y O .y .� Q'r .� N rl �Y rl rl .r .y rl ^1 .y •i .mil .r .y 'r M ^I .r .a O O w r .i O .a O O Z O O Y o O > O O ❑ O O O O O O o O O o O O o O o O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ f r N N N Q N N \ \ H N £ \ N \ W N N \ \ Y Q l \ \ \ o N v V ry c N v c U ❑ : .r .r Y .y .i Z. . W .y .� .� 0 0 0 o O o r-r o o O WO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y ❑ O O m O K Q O Y W O O Y W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z O O O O J O N O O CO U O o O J O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O m Q N O w O z O N J Q a O N I Z r W ❑ O O N ❑ m 2 2 r > > o d' .£ •O r U a W H O Q a a q' ❑ l Q❑ z a '� LL z f W J J LL � Z � x J .Ni H i d J r d ❑ 0 ON QN w SILO W SNtibI�O.�IOMbI�O�TPONMIlIP Q r OKO � NN Jb ZN LLO.� -+P ZIP UOO UI11 �t �t �i Nllly lflM MMVMVv�t v�T U . Owz r JP Om 3P t+PP J P P O Q P P Q P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P .� Z 2 W P 2 P O P SN i-IN ONN ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN wU mN WN d'N -INN U o o U o U o U o o J O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q >❑ Q o Q O m m O O O 00 O O O O O o O O o O O o O o O o O O N f O o O O O \ J 2 r > o O O O O O O O OOOONOboY \MO1 W w p o o O O N111N NmN .N I MNN.�bVw- .w b,..l MWWNy O(D O (!Q MMOV 'rr rl .BOO NI�PIIIOb J - MOM �MMPMN OIt1M ❑ •• W �tb P ON OI�ONNNNOI�I�bI�MMOI�N WELL.OU M b P mum �1 OW f�v b b❑PIIIP OOOO M.yMMMIfIPMPO d'QO-ZH OW W' PW Pf OWw P❑O OOOOO.ati Qd' 00 : 1 Of bti Illa Q bQ mO W.y� OHOIf10 Mlflb.+ti�O d09 ❑>z Oa M- OfH Om ol� O\\ Od'MOMKKdCOPPPOv•+•'+r� wof r Zz Om pZ ow oUU OW On ONN OQMI�MQ6Q a•+I�I"Cf�.yM MI�Q KCH W�+ OW OQ OW OK O.i .1. o >MNM»»MNNNN.aMMN> ddUl> OK On OK O00 v W 0 0009 N ❑ W N Z m � , Q ❑Q� d �rz � LLQ � W 2 , .i n n fit' �? O O O O n n O O b b O O o O ObbMPI[Im NN . ... ... WZ � P P b b b b O O O O m m b b b b P P b b nbMnMObMb x O, Ill 1/1 M M b b O O O O P P Ifl 1/1 � b b .a •+ M .i .a .r N m .+., U O, N N O o I11 Ill m m ti •+ m m v v a� 0 N v ,r 0 W r Y J J J J J J J J J J U a a Q Q O Q Q O 6 Q 6 a w r N r r r w r r r r r r x O •+ O O O W O O W O O O O r u r\ r r£ r J r r J r r£ r£ r H N f9 J J U U � s z s z a s s a z z z z z ax r❑❑ r ,.., ; O , ❑ .y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z Z r Z w 0 W Z J Z Z Z r Z r Z W r r W w u w £ w b w w w b W d W £ w £ W zxx > > > > W > U' > C9 > U(9 U' Netl eEU dlJ a.i W. z N r r x U S CJ r r r»daxrxr W W W Z Q Q WJJ �F-rWrQ Wo ❑� � O 3 3 6' O K U 3 3 CmmNNNd'N£ d' O LL .., v •+ �t O O �t v �1 N .n .+.+ r, N rp N M P O O O N M O M o M M M MMMObbbb111 ZQ b O b M Ill M lIl M M M bbbbMMMMb W N M � M v v v v M M MMMltly �Tv �t 111 .+c Nc Nc i r N O N O m O m O O O vet �i �i 111 If1 II1111M Z o 0 0 o v O b' O O O Ill lIl I!1 Ill 1I1 lIl III W O �o � o 0 0 o m o m o 0 0 0000000eo o z� M o v o o ., o 0 0 In In In u1 In In In In n Q o 0 o N o 0 0 o N N o00000000 W U ❑ W� o 0 0 o W o 0 0 0 0 o U o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 Y Q z \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ £ \ \ > \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ U❑ , Zit d'c v v c OAT c Kv�t �tvvvv�t ll U W .r Y Q £ um O J O O r O O �"� O 2 O Y O O ❑ O e O O O O O O O m o o Q o 0 o ZO o o a o r o F o o K o 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 O Z, w , H Y H m U W Y Y W r d' d W o m,£ •o , I r o a ❑ Y z a �, o .r ❑, a o z Z U r £ K W d w M w a .. O w ❑ J O r Z a. w O. b P S b N N N P £ n r P U v ON N N N N N N N N N U❑ W 2 w m S b d m N P Z m J b Q m 111 r P Zm W P P P P P P P P P Z S W P N P J P W P Q P W P J P N P r P W P £ N N N N N N N N N .,..Wu W N `+ N O N K N > N O N Q N a N ON W N O N N N N N N N N N O a, » ❑ O ❑ O ❑ O ❑ O W O LL O (A O (.�J O {.J O S O x e O O O O O O O e N r O O O O O O O O o O O 000000000 MPN � jb O O O O O O \MOw O O O O O O O O O O O £ N n o U' 6 � P J O v N W r,M NP n0 Om n b0 O N b mwomOP W E LL O U t . mn OW MN �?P O .Mitt OH OF otilfl llty MNbOm ad' 00 1 IfIM 0.1 oP or Pit o dU' Y ❑>Z , 00 Illy vM bQ ti0 oN bill oM ba bQ obmN.+P OIl1NM WOr £Z ClO . ON OP om On ON OP 00 Om om O�?M1/1 .atitiPr,N a•dr ,y,UJ ,y Cr Ob OP OW OP OO J10 m OM Ob OW OW OPv�T .�, .4 ram, rl rl0 Or, O.a ON Ow O.i oOv OP OK Od' o"NNbbN N�!'b M ❑ W ❑r N 2 � a ❑a d �rz LL Q � W 2 i POmbNHmVNH1[1HV b VOb111P HI211I1 Ifl O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y r ti o b H M N O m r M V M b M b M V r P b r m O o O O O O O O O O O O car, WZ Itl NOmrmmb121 m O o 0 0 0 0 V V m m r r x❑ i b .•� H .-� V M .� I[I O M N V b M N 0 Ifl N V P 1[1 O O N N Ifl 1I1 V V N N .� H UO r •+ NH If1 MMMPMr1lIH r O O M M N H 0 N V rl O W r ❑ Y J J J J J J J J U J r ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ 6 W ¢ 2 r r r r r r r r r x r r� O s LL r r w yU K d' K Z K K d' d' J Z d K W d W O >uuuuuuuu>>>>>>> O d O O O m O O O O O i N d'J N ❑ »»»» ❑ ❑ W O O ❑ ❑ O ❑ HW NZO Z NNNNNNNN Z r Z 2 Z U Z Z w d 2 U Z Qe r \ NN \\ \00 W W Z W U W H W W W H W W > N L d J J J J J N J J J J H S > U U U U U U U U > U > z > m > LL > y > Z > O\ WH Q ¢aaawa¢aarm HHHH HY•I HI'd A 7 N H KV rz H HHHHHHHHHQJ d'd'd'd'd'www J J K w 2 dH HU . wwwwwwd ww- rrrrrrrr s d\ N W W W W W W d W W W W H U U U U U U U U W a U ¢ m aH W� ryrrrrdl-rrr d'd' WWWWWWWW r 3 r L a O ❑ Q❑QQQQ❑aQ¢Q R'd' JJJJJJJJ a d 2 O W d' W S LL z x E Z N x E z x H N W W W W W W W W 3 Q m Z x r d• 00 O LL .•� H H M H r 0 P N N N N N N N N N N N 1f1 H H H V r V r P O O O o 0 H V 1f1 1[1 1[I l(l l[l lfl l!I If1 1Ll lfl lfl b O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O Z Q b b b b b b b b b b b b M H H H H H H H H M w 1I11I1 If1 N I111[11f1 1f1 l[1 N 1I1 m V V V V V V V V V M I!1 �1 P m � X ^+ H H .•� M W MMMMMMMMMMMMIfI MMMMMMMM `� M V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V M O O O e O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O ❑ O e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 OZ. rrrrrrrrrrrro rrrrrrrr o (U.f .. N.a ... .y N.. .y .y ..+.. .�.. Q O O e O o O O O O e o O e O o O o o O o o N o O o o e W U K N W N H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H W H H W H H S Wrlti rl rlti rlM tiHrl rl r-IM rl.-IMr1 .Y rI rIN rl ti MO 0 HN M O W U e O O o O O O O O o O O O r O O O O O O O O o O r O N \ r H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ON N H N Y Q > \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ U \ \ UN \ U❑� K V V V V V V V V V V V V V ❑ V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 2 N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Z \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ON \ H \ \ U H H H H H H H H H .� .-� .� n O .y .y .•� .� .a .r .� .r .i .y .r .+ Z Y H r W O e ❑ O O O O O e O O O O O e O Q O e O O O O O O O O m O O LL O 'L m W O O e O O O O O O O O O O w O O O O e O O O W O S O MO O J O w O Z z 2 H ¢ f H O Z- W U w a f U O U 7 w o W. Z •O . r '-' ' ¢ J LL Y LLIzOz� a J z a z o z w w JQ : dO K O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m P N e H M V N N N P ❑ P N P Z U❑ W Z W P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N M M M M Mo O ❑ b Z N 2 P Q m O m O P f9 m O m W Z 2 x P P P P P P P P P P P P P d P P P P P P P P S P Z P P LL P ¢ P z P V i W U O N N N N N N N N N N N N N E N N N N N N N N ON ON Q N Q N W N "N U 00 J O E \JZ > O O O . \"a w o 0 O O O O O O O � W o o (7Q ❑ .. W N r V W x LL 0 U b N H O V H M r m P H m r P N N N N N N N N b r N o m M N M b m m ❑ O❑ O❑ P W r •'+ Om ad' 00 � OOb rin Hin inrPHPrO NmmO00000 Pr Om MH HH Om b WOr . ZZx' OVHHNHHVHNMNHH OIf1111d'd'd'd'd'd' Op¢q OH Or OH ol[f OH �0311 m m., WH Oo0o0000HOV000 000a¢a6QQ oW oW off OW oo Ow o dMu.> OI[1VMPHbPbIfINrVH Olf M>>>>>> OW Ow' OH Od' OH Ow o 0 O O r r 0 0 MID m O 0 O O y o 0 0 o V �D Ifl 1[1 O O O o 0 o In In O O �N e O O o 0 ur W Z I In N m N r r N N P P m m P P O O O O W w .y O o S O I N N N N N N N N m m N N 2 N N O o U O I N N N N O o .a m' v v v .-I O N v 0 W r a c z N Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q Q N Q Q W r r J r r r r r r w r r Z r r S S O O Q O O O O N O O W O O �•+ O O rU z r r r s r r r Ir r r j r z r w r r J Z I O O r O 6. O 0 0 0 a 0 0 Z U > N I -I O O .y 0. d O z Z O Q O A W O '-' O O O Z O J O O z w z J^I F I U Z Z L Z r Z Z Z z r Z Z ID Z Mr Z Z Z QO z r I N W Z W W Y W W Z W W W b W J W J W W >N Zd I O > Q > W > O > Z > rI > Z > 3 > N > W\ > > Z > O\ W. I Z W N Z O Q O R mNF Q u W Kv ry' J J W r r' ' U I \ U J Q dw w < \ N' S U W O ' I w ' Q.I W I U r r Z r U r S ZZ Z Z o O I K O X Q Z x Q W QQ Q w Q J W 3 J W W d' IN OLL N ro IN IN Ino O M O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZOw I Q 1C w v 1[1 M W In W W v v t[1 v I11 x x w �O N I[1 V 1[1 If1 111 M l[1 a. O .+ N N N v r �t N O N N M ti w O e O z o 0 0 o O O O O v O O 0 0 JOO O O O e O O O w 00 O o O Z V m MID O .� U U Q O O O N O O O O O O O O O K W m .-I .y .y .i .-I -I .r .I .i 2 .a.y Z. .i a O O O o O O O O o QOO Qo 0 \r I N N UN N N N N N N 1NN 2N N y Q I \ \ Z \ \ \ \ \ \ \ L \ \ Z \ Y \ Ui] I Uti ZII4 w N \ \ \ \ W \ 2 \ \ -IN .\a .a N -& Q .'I 0 o U o 0 0 0 o N o o r o Z o o zo ¢ o y Z O o 00 O O O w o O Q o Q O o Q O r O pq 1 o o W o 0 o r o K O o = 0 ? 0 0 = 0 O N Q I Z Z W Q N N z O O it Ir J Y IL d eZU fz.I rI w > Z I W > W r N �t O I QOZ I y Z Q Q a LL I z • Q O r ¢ %� Ci N "I d ^ O U r J .� J I w W N O H J Y Q Q Q I owa I ZN P SN ON Sb d'P OP ylll OP OM�t OP P N U'OWZI Oap QIL rP ZP Lw Qe W wm We Zap Je x ..i IZS IUP YP CP WP JP ZP ZP QP Wl. QPP QP ZP O I wU UN ON ON 3N QN I -IN QN dN dN rNN rN �N 2 p QI>O LO ZO zo Oo wo WO No NO NO woo NO NO r N r I O O o O O O O o O O 00 O O \ J z I > O O � I w O O O O 0 0 o O O O O O \ W, M UIW O O o O O I -I ..IM I N O .+.I N .0< I o0 0 J I o O O W I O e Poo VO IC, N w E LL I O U �1 mN �C I O P W O M O . If1 O O O o m Ow 111 v ¢ 1' O O I b .'I I� M M P r I11 1I1 .r O �D o .+ v d0Y.O>ZI W- m wv WQ M.I �?O No OM M. OOO bo O.-I WOr I ZZ oz O OP am Oe O.n M� ON Ow OMM OM oo 111 2 X w,-I I WN I Q OP OIL OW ON OM ON oN am ovv OAT dam+ 6 iLul> I o7 ON OM Ow O.i am 0. of OV O� ON O O O N N O o f0 [O O O I/1O N O.yM P P P O O bti M1I1 r-�O.�N.i (OPaO Y o o �t �t o o N N o O �t MIlIN NIl1 N P P M M oo Mllt aDNMN.r NIIIM Ur ; wz In In P P r r m ao M M 1flbrNrP ao P P r r a0rrbrbOOMONO 2❑ � r r P P r r �1 �1 III 1I1 �tMr�TMM r r r O O MONIf1 N�TNblllb MM UO � � � M M M M N �t r r rIMN Mr, •+� 0 N v O W f � ❑ � x ti J J J J J N ¢ Q W f H F F r Q O O NN 2 Z O o O O O q OO N x�\coN v N r�F-r��rrF-r�f- ,N., K Z d' Z2ESSLZELZEL S O d O O, d ❑ , q q w Z Z ❑ ❑ wx r2J O N ❑ q dddddddddddd H \NQ Z <O Z Z Z W E W WNQZ W W O W Oq❑OggOqOOqO > U' > dUZ.i3 U' > H > ,-� > KKK d'K KKCCCKC O\ UUUUUUUUUUUU W. Z N Z S `+ \� W N QQQQ¢¢QQQQ¢Q we Fd' J •+ N O ONJJ,-,N Z H d.� tnU , \ K r, K Jd'Q 2•+LL W � QQQQQQQQ6QQQ d\ N� 2 J W H r ZOf(9>F Z NNNNNNNNNNNN Qo G i K Q Q QdQt+3 w d' Z Q >>>>>to>>>>>> W Q LL d H 3 nopo=H »»»»»» d' ❑LL O v 1Il Ill O Pb Nit �1 �t N O .,NMr, II1M OMNII1tirI fO M.+boon N o 00o0oo,rM o1l1b0 ZQo M � M M MOM.+•+r, rI M ,-,b Mr,MMONbbMb W1I. III If. 1I. . I1. . I!. Ill If. �. If. X n.,ti.r ., .n 1I11111IIN NM W b .y .Na M b III III N M M M ,-I O N �t O I111f1V �1'11 �t N O NNM�t �ftitiM Mill 111 .i Z o O O O O 00111000 O O o0000000 o1f11110 O OOOOoO O O 000000000000 0Z1,'tiNMMMIl1111r U ti n .� .9.1 ,-I .1 i U ,-, ,-1 ,r Q O O O O N OOo000 O O OOOOOo000000 Q rlti„'l rltir,ti rr ,-1r„-, r, ❑ ,-I r1 r1 ti rl rl N Q q •-, qW O O F-i0 O WO 000000 O UO d'000NNNNNNNNN NNNNNN N �N QNNNNNNNNNNNN U❑ c Nit c � C � C � c Zit ' C Vv�?vvOvvv�?V�1' O no wo wO ¢o .+000000 Uo ao zO0000000OOOo Y p K Z wo o ,-,o Zo o K000000 2 r+o o N00000000OooO o Cno 30 Q❑o �o OoOOOOO ?O UO moO0000000000 Z, W 0 H ❑ K U C OlQOZI Q W J J Z U LL, 2 ❑ W Rl ❑ Z Z LL tiN, d p N Z O O 2 J,w Q , 0wo . Nb d'b LO ZP QN Nrtiba0P0 NN wap w w mt U.QWZ, XW Wb b ww JP ,-MI IlIUllllb Mb rnb Jrrrrrrr .a ,ZS OP 3P QP JP JP d'PPPPPP d'P NP JPPPPPPPPPPPP ., �WU SN ON ON QN QN WNNNNNN WN WNNNNNNNNNNNN ,-,N o Q,>❑ Ho I-o ❑o >O >o >OOoOOO >O >0 3Ooo0 oo0000000 N r, p O O O o O 000000 O \JZl > NM❑ , p O O O o O O O O O \MOW O o O .Na O OOMMP O ❑ •• W ...,N NI[I IIIO O =MoI 1l 1. eor No a WLLL:OU N KQO, 2C �1 .� No PN NN PW NN�NWMN Qd. pO l 0- bP a0M NW PH N . . . . P . 00 r,P ONNNNNNNNNNNN wc0 .Z>Z, O- Om MP NW IIIQ N, , r , , WOf 2= OZ OM OM OJ Om o11IH00,-," Ob ON Orrrrrrrrrrrr ddU�>� O7 OP Op O> Ow oMr❑Mrr O.-, O.n OMMMMMMMMMMMM 0313 � P w m to Z N m I O a �rz � LLQ � W S O lIl O O CO O O OP y v N O O 00 O O ON Ur i . WZ : N SO I� v N N Iffy o m mo UO � I� rIN v m fOv Z � N a� 0 N v O W � r Q � N J J N J J N U 6 6 \ Q QWx w r r M•+ r rz. 00« NU r r r .yN r (!1 rrri� i.y 1 E 0 0 0 Z 0 o J ZI Y 0 �1N O tl Z- O W O .. O Z * w J .I Z S Z\ 2 r a0 r O W U W NS W Z Wx+k C > Z > d .vi NU; U J WW Jw rJi rJ., z a w w r. mm 0 r O>k p, .. a oo a r»< w > a zE a J r0 O O NN M � FI Z Q M U� w If1 If1 r N N NN o ZoO o 0 00 0 i o 0 00 0 pz, U Q O O 00 N pw� Ko 0 Oo 0 U p y 0 O Z No o MOO 0 m o0 0 MOM O Z�W O a Z 0 1' , Z • O � U' O 3 3 .1 J i y.❑ LL K w ^ a O1'O NIII WP JON WN U�L]W2� Jm Em WIT LLP 2S JP EP �..�NN ON W U W N N 3MO 30 N r O O O 00 O \ J Z > M P rl , yF O \ M O.w o 0 0 0 N Oo ca¢ � J � O •• W W S O U v O M M R'aO , Z. 00 N III III OW Q1' Mm OPN or wog l p>Z ON MY MVm mm, wOr zZ Or =M.W O.. Om (L'R'N WN 00 OW M.y OW OM 01' OPP OK 0*'14 p W or: N Z : N O W 6�O z � ¢ cap d �rz �wx 0 0 OI[IO.+N Oft OaOM1Ob�lbvoaO vaD �i M1�1 N Oo0 O P P O �1N b 0 0 O O O MMMOMONOn�. If. O N N O y Ur. �1W N W O 111 Inb b . . . . .OWNIl. . . . oblflnNO111P O.ynO Pill f0 PU1M1M MI110D '+ . . . O M M Ifl M1 WZ. 11 bn �i n M1 O O NM1tilfl �t .+O.INM1NilI riM 00vM1Mvbb P OMM O M1 Ifl ill xp UO � ti •+ � ^ .IM� M n aO NWV 6� 0 N N N O W J J J y J J J ¢ ¢ Q W r r r r O O O r U r r Y r 0 X Q d' O d d }} d' QQ d' rrr K K O O U Z O ¢ O Z O d'K dd UU O UUU O J o m o aQ WU NN Z Z ddd z Z r d'x Z r z z w m N 2 w WW WNW o0wwm WIC row zz y W W U W > K O dW w > w > > >>>>>x i� . QZri aQ »» > 000 > > N >N O\ Ed W N z J J J y 3 J LL J J N N N N N a \\\ riXs 00 KWr dWr dWr KWr 6r drdrd '#N#N# Kr 6r dWr NNN d i-IU r 4 d\ 1 N, mm > > r'r ### a N W. 0� ww z a aaprrraaaaaaaaaaQaaaaz wow Now 3 d 0 W LLLL r� d 33JNNN333333333333333N d .. o bbNbbbPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPIII i..p Po O 'i '1 ri '•I rl ri '1 rl rl .-� r'1 N rY rl .. O O O IN o N i i . . . . . .r .y ti.r .i �.i .y ti.y .a .-�.i .+.�N Ill lfl 111 b O ZQ M.a O P r-�.y0.•�.y.a vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv�t v� CM vet �? I11 W vv O I11 Ifl UINNNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMO Ill I11111 "' v v W w i �� '.i v N vet �i vet �l �T �t v�1'vv�l �i �f �i �i �t �ivvM1 1111111f1 �t �1 I(1v d'v vv�?�1 J�1 �t �t �T �T �i v.a bbri Q r ��p O O o vv111111111 M O= M MM O O O O O O O= O O o o O O O o b b P O o o z 00 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n O o. CO MM v O MMMwlllillM1M1M1M1M1nnnnnM1M1M1M1M1P oZ - � "'i � ti o00000000000000000000o Zoeo 0 0 z z O O ILO Ci O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O o O O O o O O o N o N N N N O W O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lw N M \ \ \ \ \ \ r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d' . .y Uo i WNN .+ Wti.1.a.0.1.+.�.a .r .1 .a .�.�.y .1 .y .-�.a�n.y .r w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rNNN N N N N d N N W W N N N <N Q N r U o 0 O o o MID o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U vm 0 m 0 y > C WO Y W o O O o O o O O o O O O O O O O O O o O O O N O O O J O Q O O Z W O O O O r o O o 0 o 0 0 0 O O o o O O O O o O o O o O o r O o o O IT,N a� o O J Z. W Ir y Z > Z Q Z ¢ n N d' . z •O . O. Q O Z. w K Z Q O J J O U U 2 LL� Z O K N J z i"i P ri 1 d J 1 K U W LL K SPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPNNNNNP r d'10 t0 OC x?' aP HM1 Q,. NaOaD �P Wti dN (.lbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbu0 a0 EO t0 a0b Wbbb db U , MF]wz. bb zb M 00 00 ~ J M Q O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W M M 0 o O o O Ci pQ.> i W U ❑ M M WO U z U o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O O O o 0 o O o 00o O O O ¢ O O o d o000000000000e00000000 N r� O o0 NMO . p 1 O O O O NaONOobbva0vba0NON�t baON o o O O \MO1W O O O ObN 1110 Mgt 1[IwMnn PaG aO .-I tO OOPNMM1Vb 10 Nri b (ON 00 I/1 I11b apm M.y .rPbnNnnn 0 �a' 0 bM1n000b olno r...+�PovPM1Pn J' .i MM1MIl11f1 I(I .��]'O wnbaD Op ILIbNMnMM1 NW b W Il11fIM mIn P ON OM1bM1ao 00 aDM aDM 00 b�ibbv�t MaO btO b�+ b �1 aD to MO WZLL wx KQO l Of..l � Z�-i .+bb P.i M.-i bnMnri .+M1111f1PMPMM1.+111P tiP.aPno � bOiO(1Z-�i rMi .M�uNDO�PNONM1.iM.aM�NMnbM1�t t[IP0P.0 VOOo'~WUq d fZ9Y L]>Z OOo�.N+ WO rizz 0 O 315 ww"IWrI oNNN1PMPMPMbti�Mi dpUl> 1 00 N O w ❑ H N 2 � N ❑ � Q ❑Q a z WQ �wx � Y U f WE 2 0 U O � Q � N N O N N N O W H ❑ U W 2 F- U H J Z� ¢o H� O\ WNW Q N W i O q� W z O �o ow Z ¢ W a x w H_ O O O Z U Q W O qw� \ F � Y Q U ❑ : W x U Y Z m Ni r Z r W U N O QOZ I Q LL Z Z U. Umwz Q � N Z x z N � W U O oPN � iC N M � � ❑ O Nx �M o W Q J � q •• W z Q O Z� M amr o>z ww. 1 WN O d du i> o O Oo 0 0 o mrOmmONm r �O �D o0 0 00 0 N �O NO o m O V m V o0 0 �OV O O o0 o V V MMmmMNNn V P P o0 0 00 o m mm O �0 b m`Cr mL mU M `D P P mm 0 mm o N U 2 U M M N N N N J J J J J J J O UU O o zx o r o >>>>>> ❑ o c� o xx O xz O x o x o Uc.+ o xx ❑ x ❑ »»» ❑ M z xx ❑ xx ❑ d ❑ d ❑ z z oo z z 000000 z z oo z oo z z z as z W UU W ❑ W W W UU W UU W W W W W W UUUUUUUU > Y > > > H > ~ > 00 UU > NNh1M 3 UU ZZ O zzzwwwwzzz Z2 J J \\ NN m Ow U U U U U U U U J Ow Ow W W M M 0 0 U W W W w W w W W Q 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ## 00 J J J J J J J J J W 00 00 Q N y y ME Z W W W W W W W W Y x 2 x S N 0o rVVVrVrV N oo o0 N N m V V V V V V V V m N N N N V V V V m m m m r M1 V V V V V V V V V V n M1 r M1 V NN VVVVVVVV N NN NN N N `D .+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O on O O �D P NN 0 00000000 o NN NN o o nr PP .+ rrrrrrnn �0 PP PP V V ^�N vv o 00000000 o vv vv 00 NN .-� NNNNNNNN N NN U Z N rl rl n rl N rl rl ."1 rl rl r1 rl cc co O n N N O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N N ❑ N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N K N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ W\\ NN N ONNNNNNNN N NN NN N N V)NN NN O O O M O O O O O O O o O J O O O O O o O O n T r 00 �o ¢00000000 o ao0 00 0 am .=m A .400 z o N o o o o 0 0 o 0 o W o o Z o o o J o W H z W W > U W U 3 N Z J d O 0 Q Z Q z N O J J O U W N J W W N M W P K P P P P P P N N m y U o N Z V m f M H m W n m 3 0r 0m Zn Orn ❑rM1 xN 3M1r o zoo Zo dmo00o0oo x0 zoo woo cor (ao xo0 0 O M M W M = M M M M M M M M O M Q M M W M M N N N M Q M M U om M ❑ O O :cm N O O o O O O o O no J O O J O O J O Jo x 0 0 0o 0 0oo0omoo O o0 00 0 o O O O O 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P P O P r m m O m m r r N r � O N n M N P V m m P m m m N N NNN N y�.M=00�N m mNN �ONN Mm Pm Omm N r N N b m N m v m m m M r V N m �o N N m N N N o r o N m m N m. OZ ONw..NWNN ME m• m. NO VO VNN O , C o z x o N o v N o 0 o N v o 0. O Z Z oo Z¢ ZQ 0 O o 0 o O o o ; v oQ¢ ow oo00o0o00 ow oQQ o0 00 omm o m In O w o m m m m m m m m 0 1• = I n m In O N o N m N N O p o o v w o 0 oz i , N m 0 , n r M ¢ oar d ��z �LLa � W 2 mm Y rl rl M O O NO O rO n O O M M mti o DJ m O o O O brl m wz O . In Ifl P III 1I1 In b b Ill O b ILI If1 Ifl If1 �T � P r b 20 U O Y W 0 2 N U \i N N O W � H � a W, t Me h Y� t M( t MI R i Mt O Y J J J J J U a (D a Oo Z 0 0 00 2 r o 2 o ww o o £ o O o £ o a rU Wry F !- JJ F Nm F F H z O w QQ K HN d' O w d' 00 d' K ❑ d' Q K WN d'❑ J Z QF- 0 a 0>> .i O JK ❑ ❑ III III ❑ dd ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ 2 ❑ v ❑O J.i M do z h z mm z dd z F z z z dd z ❑ z f z m z z\ zVl Qo F d w z w bb w» w z w 0 w ww w K w z w m w W.i Wm yN £d Y > W > NN > wo > W > H > 00 > Q > W > > N > O\ W. KJ £ mm Z H UU > H J W> ❑ M. ww F Q \\ dN I-IU YU N mm UU m F NN w N O \N Z d\ m l Z w QQ I -I r� W m MM W K 2 Q a.i W . L> > 22 LLLL > m ## F- > Y NJ 2 o ❑, 00 Z W W LLLL Z 30 W f U I -I 6' C 00 �-+ M ow 3 �'+ K.. OLL .i .i N O O NN HO NN O .i .r .in O �t NN p.I 00 rl 00 00 o Oo O � O ❑ N H 1I1 Ill b O .i •� ti Z¢ bb o II z bb .Oi v w 111 Ifl ti v v mm X mm N Min M •' O •� •� w vv v mm vv V c IIIIII z v N �v F• ti .� .i m m .i N z 00 O cz 00 O lIt bP O O o 00 o0 0 oO po mm o o rn o 0 0 00 w .i v v .•, .i .+ .i • v v U Z O Owl O O O m O mm O O O O ZOO O O o O r O N N \f i NN N NN NN N N ONN N N W' Y Q \ \ \ U \ \ \ \ \ \ .i \ \ \ \ W \ \ \ U p- .i .i .i Z r .i .i .i .i ti F- .i ti N N m N N N W NN N " O N NN N Z N U N N N N W N N N MN\ WO li o O Om f o O o 0 Z 0 o Z o = o N o 0 0 2 Y Z m O O H O h O O O O Q O WO Z O o m pOO d'O fJOO 00 JaO �O UO0 O W. LLO LLOO K Y d H 0 O F O 0 W H J 2- W 3 0 d m a Q U N IOi Z 1 J D O ❑ Q a Q F~- 3 P d J N U ❑ 0 J 0 ❑ 0 -1 J I d I W Z w U❑ W Z O m m d'OO H b ¢ m m Fi b b Y b J r ❑ m m K b C b H N rib b ..� z2 ❑00 MO HbO LLOO KO 00 WOO QO .i .WU UMM OM NO LLMM QM QM WMM dM dM Z0 WMM O ¢-> p M 0 0 M o Z o 0 000 d 0 d o W o0 0o m oO m 0 ln 0 d IX > O o N F. O 00 0 00 00 O O \ J Z > O O N M p l O O O O O O O O O \MO 1w O O O OO O N£ 10 mc oUQ o0 J NO N rI rI N q.. W 00 NN N O O MN OMN WELL:OC.1 I Nmm III .iMM v v mti b.+ PNN d'QO Z`+ NMM Ovm b III dU' Y ❑>2 Omm M. -i Ul �t �t OMM M-i M~ N cr oz c~ O.ir W O r Z 2 0 0 0 0 2 O M M o n r o z o m o 0 0 o r r Onr' Ov�T oa ow 000 o0 OQ =00ONN OM OIf m 07, oLL O.i.i O.i On ON orr 0)17 v o m� w vP Q L1Q � ¢1P a �rz r i LLQ N � W 2 M Y �t U r W Z � m 2 � N N O N rl N 0 w r a O * > y N* U W* 2 � * rU r* N H A * >N Say w* w ro r M � L1 N r za w o a z x Q w � co r z oz� U U a W O W � Y Q � JA � W 2 U Y Z m D a � Z W I� C � E •O � N O�QOZ� w � 2 J � K a �ozo� - ZS � W U N r o > J � W S LL 00 O W Q O Z" P dUY O>Z- N wor zz o �z... w.. o aaJ�> � o 0j"18 w ❑ N ZI N ❑ W 1 W.0 1 Q ❑a� a �rz :wa :wx f�I�Mb M O o OOoo00M�1 �t �t Ill O o o O I21111111 IL1 O o 0 0 0 o O Y NMIII., M O O OOOOOOMOM[O P P O O �t �t �1V c0 O O UI IIl O O Ur. WZ I '.O M1� N 1I1 III OOOOOM N.ytiti •+ b b o O ��W� "I v v v v P P 2❑ ti rl O N � N N O W r ❑ J J J J J J J J J a a a a a a a w NNy Q ¢ r r r r r r rw0iW O O O D O O O O 2 JJJIr r r r r r N r r r r r r r U £ y o.w LLJ JJJJJJJJJJ L W aaaa � z ¢aaaaaaaaa s } � ❑ z � z } � � Z 0 0❑ a O O r r r r r r r r r r O LL O ❑ O O O !L O O o N o N m ❑ ❑ z Z Z z Z Z z z z Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N Z Z W w W W W W W W W W z w' z tL Z J J J J Z Z K Z Z QO r oo \ W w www'wwwwwww W O W . w �¢QQ w W O W N W > r > x > .. ..., > > r > o > O\ WH l .IZ-�MQ > > xxxxxxxxxx U N wwwlx U (J sln rW : rrr.. ❑ zzznszaxzss ❑ z 0000 ❑ 0 0 AN �.U� X<<W z 0000000000 K w rrrr z w y\ y l wwww ❑ LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLL r 0 .... ❑ �"• ¢.. W wwwr N E ZZzz LL N 2 o ❑, a a a a w Z z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z z w a a a a w z w z• LL r0 Orrr M M lllW �WNN o 10N.M OOOOm.0000 O M O ❑ N pill i .1 .... l ... z ¢ b b b b O �t �t �t �t �i M M N N N N O M M w M W W W M UI c V v l? a .. X vbPn .. .. ..ti n.. .. .. .. ..ti M ..mom N .. W NN..M N MMMMMMMMMM ltl b Illlllllllll v Itl V �t �t lt M �t �T �t V �t �!' �? �t �t �t �t �t �I lI ci �I ll M V I r �tbapM O MMMMM�t �1V�t �t N .. NNNN O M O $ I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0. O O O O (.9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OZ - Illl/IMI Z. rrrrrrrrrr M b MMMM M M ......, r .. ........... ... .. .. ......... .. .. ¢ ooOO ¢o oOOO.00.Oim 0 o OOoo 0 0 0 .. ^I .. .. W.. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. ^. .. .. z.. .. .. .. ... .. .. Ill x o d1 f. N ❑ W MOO. 2 O O O O O O O O O O O O M O > O O O O O O N \ r: N N N N W N N N N N N N N N N N N O N > N N N N N N \ Ya \\\\ MIA \\\\\\\\\\ \ o\ d'\\\\ \ \ UO I Null! N £Ill Illllllllllllllllll/llllll N JIII ON WlllN 11N N N N W N N N N MN N N N N N N N N N N W N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O WO ZO O O O O O O O O Y Z O 00. Um O O o O O o O O o O O o LL O O O O W O O O [q O O O o Q O O O o O o O O O O O -xo Z o Z o 0 0 o Z o o U o F .. Ir W Q J > > J 2 Z ZIW w 0 x tL W J Q w W o O I Q O Z 1 3 O U O W Q M Z O N `. Z Z K ^ N _ J . w w a w Q 01'O 201�bM NIA O.. MI111�PN1t b000 w'.. Ir.. lx� .... P WD aN WA W WNNNN KO ❑P U-❑WZ- wwo,-, N 000 >. Win WooOO. f0 00 ❑ IZS WOOOO No0o0000M O WU UMMMM JM EM £MMMM zM w ❑ O Q > .1000. a o ¢ O o o O o O O O O o ¢ O ¢ o ¢ O o o O ¢ o a O W 00 w N r O o O O o O O O O O o O o o O o O O O O O O O O \ J Z > MPI'. l# O O O O O O O NM7 I O O O O O O O o o O \ M O l W O r O I� OM 0 f9Q I Mblll .�MM bIII ..M � bo W J � Ill b IlIP 001f1 b 111PO .. It �tb � ❑.. w belt bl�bP�tbl� ti O v W E O. O U N N b w'QO 1 Z0 011l-.b❑ .. .. f��t �?�TM Mgt �t �iMM 00 Qd' 00 OMoo. OM m=Vmx=mx Vet 00 ON O.Mo. OM PO M N wag l ❑>Z I OOOPF. bb IlIE£2E£xE£SE III . ON O.1 O0 bb 0. ON M W O r Z Z o W w0 w O# o>> 7>>> J O 7 O O K O N O o b O O O b O O O N O yrCM Wf. 0000¢ OJ OYY}YY}YY}Y oQ Ob Oft t OP ON Ow o aaU •� O."I ..ti> Op] OJJJJJJJJJJ O> ob OnJti.. opt ON oP ® • /� N O W 0r NZ� NOS W � K r•� O � a qQ' a �rz � LLQ �WS O o O o �t �1 O o OOo O q'�?.•�M N O O M M N N O O O o Y r r O o r r O o OOo O 11PMP r O O M M N O O O O W Z N N 111 1f1 N N e O O l(11[1 O .-I rl O b O O O QI l0 N N N O O Sq W W v v b b N q U O � N N M M N N �+ � •+ �t ^ u1 b �t v � � o 0 0 0 Q� a0 m 1/1 111 .a N i O N N O W r Q Q a r a r a a a a a Q w H r r r rZN r K 0 0 ru r r 0 r r r JrK r u r r r r r z r O Y S K LL K r K U K K O K �+ K J 2 LL O J O O D 2 S Q O J O Z O > O 0 O o 0 q O O q U ❑ K O W ❑ q W 0 W q N ❑ Z Q N 0 Z 0 Jti M R' Z 1 Z Q Z W Z LLaa Z Z Y Z Z N Z Z Z '1 Z QO r o W U W W W LL W HHry W N W z W 0 W LL W O W LL W >N Z(L r > W > (9 > > 22= > J W > ry > z > W > F > > O\ W"' U K 3 woo a �"� a Kitt rK j Y O KKK �w r K 3 Q W !LN U. K P r 2 WWW KJJW K W w W J y\ of r M W 0 mom Waar W 3 SSS raar r N U Z W a o M l Z CO Q O W W W Q» Q Z Z W z N w w Q N Z ESE xowm W Q ❑ Q OLL rp M N O .n MMM NNNo N N O � � l(1 lt1 1[1 � ZQ M M b ti MMM bbbM b b �t N O w M M Itl ltl 1 m N m 111 m v W 1[1 Q M tq x w 1t1 b M M NNW MMM .a Ill M M b Ifl $ O O o O 000 OOOo O O O o O ]p � O O O O 000 0000 e O O O O OZ M o r Wr MMM rrro M r r b M (Uj rl N N Mo Zo ti U rl .� r1 rl ti rl ti m Q o MM= 0000 0 0 0 0 O.a N .y N ri K 2 J O O O N K LL N Z.y O .a m 00 W00m ti.y .y .� .� Q.y .a K.•+ Sn N qW� e No O N NNO So O Wo O❑ \r� N ON N N KNNN NN UN N WN WN ❑ W YQ. \ W\ N\ \ U\\\ \\\\ \ x\ \ Z\ O\ z Up1 N UN KN WW W1[NN NNNN N WN N MN um ON M W N NN ON 3N KNNN NNNN N N N ON ON 2 \ >\ r\ O\ \\\ ti\\\ \ W\ \ Z\ W\ z O WO QO O 000 0000 JO =0 z N K r N Z o o r0 z0 yoeo 0000 O o O Wo Wo 2 1q WO WO ZO NO KOeO OOOo q0 JO �O JO N P H Q H U O' LL > W r Q Q J z l W Z N G r W > > J O 0 0 0 Z K W �"� �"� F H Q J ry .i rwi ZIL Q w K K N J Q N J J U z r O O O W J S W W K Q 1 0K0 l WO Nr LLO LL� LLW�W OO brttl rim Yo Z'+ 2ltl SM W UlOWZ: qo 'N "M OD Ub Q'+ U111 U111 S .y I ZS q.r JO WO WO 60 QO <0 .� IWU OM QM QM QM QMMM QNNNN QM SM JM OM OM O Uo Uo U=o U0000 Uo Uo Ue c.f oe Uoe v 0M0 ooeo 0 0 0 I[1 P yy � iC O o O O O NMI � 0 O O O O 00 O O O O .yS 10 O t=Q OPMN O J e b M P ❑ W ..rrr111 m .iN 1I1 N e N WELL - O U I cP b m N KQO 2�+ r= N. 111 MNap OOme ti .y0 M.y b N O QK 00 NO Oft �t0 t0 0rn.. OMMMM v flUY I q>Z Mf+ bM ON Ob tirlrb OPPPP 1f1ti v'+ OM 111r 111 .y b 0 WOr�ZZ OK Orl Oti Ob O�TM�i OMMMM Orl 00 O`O oP Orl o J` OZ Oti ol0 OrINP OMMMM Orl Orl ON Ol(1 Or O LL fLU � > � o> OH oLL Ob O.atiN orrrr oN O.y ob Or o.-� O M p W or- N Z I N O W I Z H O I O 0 1 2 I a qa1 a �rz I I LLQ I W 2 Y 1I. lf. I!. If. H O o e. O O O r P r t0 H I1. O P r r P P O o 00 40 wz I I O O ON O o �0 CWNN= 20 I M M P P O O O O N N O O IDN1f1 H N N N N 0p O O O U01 M M O O N N O O r r r r MV.+ H H N H "' •'I °° O 2 1 n n n n n H P P ¢ I H H N N `D N N H rl O N N N O W f y J J H J a J J J J J J J J U Q Q H Q LL Q Q Q N Q Q Q Q 6 2 O O LL O C O Ift O O 2 O O O J O o O (DO t- w z 0 N I 2' H K J 2 1 O Z UI O Q O O D O O U' O LL O O W 0 O O H 0 1 Z O Z z N z O z 2 z Y H p z z C z N z JH H I J Z Z J Z O Z N Z O Z LLJJJ Z 0 Z Z Z Z Q o f 1 Q W F W Q W Z w z w U w a Q w o w 2 W r w w w w >N SaI U > LL > H > > O > J > WWUU > H > > Z > LL' > o\ wH I H H U w H a <HHU(..ii,.1 (.% w < KO HK I K 0 w J za Q•WHHH U p 2 PII LLN HU F H O YYhf LLLLLL K N LL Q LL\ N I U N 2 F W O NNUULLWLL F M H LL QH W I W W !- O WWwN 7C p W o 0, J p O m W J fLWJJW1'd'w Z W d W W N U LL K W LLLLW WI-Ff I'^ 1 N N N N V V V M H H H F O N Itt r t[1 1[I N o 1f1 o M 1[I 1f1 I111[I O o o V V o 0 ZMO ¢ w 111 I21 M V V M 1I1 I111t11[I V V V M V V V W M M W W N 1[1 I11 M M M M M Itl N M to V If1 V V ul V VVVVVVV V V V �1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I � V O O r V 1I1 IL1 V V V V V N l(1 M O Z O O O O rl I21 0000000 O l(1 O V O O O O O O O O O O f0 OZ o r O m 1[1 MMr rrrr M 111 r ^I U I I H„I 'I rl rl H rl rl H H r'I rl r1 U H N H o H Q O N O U o r O O O O O O O O O O O N .-+ Zlfl JH N UV •+ .•IHHHHHH H W O J 2 H w rH MH WH ti nH N H.•�H.d .a .r .1 H .+ zm NH JH UH •^ p W 1 O o 0. H o o 00 o o O O o O O o o Z o o \F- I ON ON >N N UN N NNNNN NN N ON HN N > Y Q I Z \ \ w \ \ \ \ T \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H \ \ \ 6 U p I H Ifl 2 1[1 W N N Z N W N J 1111111f11f1 1f11f N N < N J 1I1 N q w N O N N N N ON UN LL N N N N N N N N Q N Q N N WN f\ \ n U ZH f.+ HH H F.i rH OHH HHHHH H O.i ZH H N H o Q o 2 0 o U o ? O N O o o O o 0 0 0 w O O o F Y F Z W U O O O O O O O O 0. O O Q (p (J O O O W O O f O O H O O O O O O O O U O Z O O U p. ¢ I H W O N �• � 2 N W O H H J Z Q Z I W H Z U O 0 1 QOz I Q U J O W W Y 3 JV I Z H n q O dH 4! w W o Q I OKO I Wr JN NV N JV 1'H CHVrIH.+HH QN r N S N W O Q N W H H H H H H H 2 0 Z N M o H O Z .y I Z S S H 1' o O H N o r H LL O N o O O o 0 0 0 Z H Z H 2 0 > o ¢ H I W U I O M O M 1' M O M Q M W M W M M M M M M M O M o M J M Z M > o Q I>> I U o U O U O 00 O o q o p o 0 0 0 0 0 o q o o o W o W o W N H I O O O O O O O omo.0M0 O O O O \ J Z I > 1[I P H I jp o O O O O O O O NMO 1 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ M Q I W O O O O .i .•I'I .i N .4 .•I HS 'N 0000eoo H H o U'61 = Ooo Www v o J I r O OWNNMMI r O .•, WELL I OU NV HW V EO NH N �DOOONNI[I I11 .y PN l(10 PO P W<C I ZH N00 Mo O M OH Hr NM�0 �0 �OOOM 000 (OH oP N P ¢y. Opl OH b�D NH OH MZ .+b OVVPPNNV LL (9T worU IIZ> z 21I �O0HH OVO MOH lO(1HH Vo Hff NO WK oOo0 OWP ON40r r40 a0 ap OoHKa NPro Ooo1vM[1 loO[11.M111 VoO 0321 O> N N IIIv o O rIDN 1[I P P eN0 �0 O o .n rl O O O O 00 O O O ur W Z NN P .+ OMm 20 � MrP P ti ti OOM �? M M 0�10 V r r N N O O O O ti0 N N 1I1 UO � V M m � .i N N V O O Nr0 N M M .� •-� III III N.+ M M M p N N 0 w w r � N y J J J \ J J J J J J J J U Q Q 6 r Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 6 w r r r N r r r LL r r r r r x O O O O O O O O O O O O rU r r NNN r U r ❑Q i„i tY H K tiNi-+ 1' N 1' ❑d 1' 6' W K 1' Y d' YY C' K J Z O Q O JJJ O W O yWLL O O O O d 0 as O O .1 0, ❑ £. ❑ aaa ❑ ❑ ❑ 0£ ❑ ❑ J ❑ ❑ ❑ O O ZZZ Z Z aaa Z M Z O W Z Z Q Z Z w Z ww Z Z Qo r l 000 W r W ❑❑O W Z W MYz W W Z W W O W co W W >N £LL FaI-I I -I > S > NNN > a > UmJ > N > 0 > > U > UU > > O\ Wr�l NNN 0 M N r W I WWW HI WWW ••+ Q Z w N ❑ _❑ ❑ LLN f+U I ❑❑❑ Z WWW \ LLOO 6.\ 0. K LLLLLL O Q.I W I UUU W LLLLLL mom S LL iC N MN w o ❑� WWW > 000 Y WQW W w y Z Z Z w w mom O UUU LL LLLLLL !L r r '+ w R' ❑LL r0 rry .. rrr r rrr N N o M MM e 000 M NNN O 000 III o V �? VV O ❑N ..I I III I ICI I Z¢ W MMM N NMM III M NNMI/I N N V M MM M d tititi N NNN x W M N m .+ .'I .+ .y M .'I .+ M M N N N N VNN V VVV V VVV V V N V VV N r . 10 N NNN N MMM V IC O M MM 0 Z ory m mmm 0 mmo o O o 0 00 0 no, orm o opo o MO= o 0 0 o mo 0 OZ I r...y V VVV r .+.+.'I r r o M MM O U I I I I I I I I I I .II ¢ o00 0 000 0o mom 0 0 m o eM o N W Z U .r ..I .+ W ❑ W I N O O O O O O e K O "mmm am O O Z O a. O \ r l > N N N N NNN N NNN H N N N W N N N N y Q I Q \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ❑ \ W \ \ \ ❑ \ U \ \ r \ \ \ \ um. ❑NNN N WNNN NN >NNN WN ZN N WN II N ON W NNN N WNNN 1'N NNN WN I -IN N 1'N NN rIN W o o p o > 0 0 0 I p 0 0 0 3 e ZO o Q M. o 0 0 .. o y r A Z Q O O o o W o 0 o Z O U o 0 o 0. H o W O r 0 o e LL o m "mmm p 0.0O "0 00o d0 ao Y❑o ao IW oo Oo r W J H I O W Z Z I W N U I -I O LL J W P 1' I£ • O I N i-I O W LL Z .a U' Ir W LL o O I Q O Z I Q O U w O b Y 2 K O O W 0 W Q I Owo I NVVV Xr rMV�o ❑r ZNNN QN UV U'.-I OM ZVN WP Z U I❑ W Z I Z 0 0 0 W N N N N N ON . 0 0 e NC O L] P P U o ..I I Z S Q .'I .n .'i ❑ .'I 6' O O r-I ❑ .'I w O .y >MMM WM rrMMM JM OMMM QM ❑M WM i WU i-IM OMM CLM 1' p QI» Wo00 LLO LLo00 LLo LLOOo am 00 00 UFO (Dom am N N r I O 000 0 000 o OOo O O o O Oo O NPuZ•I 7F> \ M d I W o o O o b O O O o o O O O . z .0 e(AQ I N J I N N V ❑ .. W P W E LL I OJ IP PN 0 .IO P P m m rN oN V O d'QO I Z8 PN�Or .yM MVMO .1O P M N �0 eO 0❑P .� 0 ¢y OO P V.NN .-gym OPPN Oo m Nm OM MAD NO �O O.i Or OO JL I❑>Zi mmco 00 OHO m ADO V�O ..r OM .a0 ON Vrl NI-+r VN N LJ WOr i ZZ =mom OHO mmmO oo OrPr om mm O.I 01' OR'O pip (L U I w.. 0000 OM MO.. OU ONNN Ob OM OV 06 OQN oP O p•aU l > I OMMM Or O.-I .i .a OLL ONNN Oft O.i O`D o> O>N Oft O ❑ W N21 N ❑ W I ZIrO I a ❑a� d �Fz I LLQ � W 2 r r O M M o O o O 1f1 ltl 1I1 P �T O O o O (O P n P N ti O O 1[1 y r. . "I . . . . . N N 1f. . N . . . . r1 r. M 1I. 10 �. O O ; W Z OF I I 1[1 N M M b M M O M M M o .+ n W b III l(1 O O CD III M O O 2❑ I M M M b P r n •'� .'I O n M M III 111 r n III M l0 N 1(1 III IIl M N N III III W lI1 QI 0 N � I I N O W H G� >k x � ♦ < � + s a x Y J J J J J J U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q w 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 r H E H H F f 2 0 0 0 0 0 Z w w J Z o o d o 0 o u 0 0 o a o ❑ 0 0 .. O ❑ ❑ ❑ N ❑ > ❑ ❑ ❑ Z 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Z Z w Z n Z N Z Z Z Z J Z JJ Z z d Z Qo I= z w w o w z w w wo w w o w Qa w w .+ W >N Ed I 0 > > f > d > LL > d1-I > > ❑ > UN > Q > N > Z a� UQ ❑ f KK YI-I Z H dN rIU I o Qa K d d ¢. ON M w uu aw w \.. w l nu da V (.9 U Zd' LL N ww dr x z O p ♦_ NN Z O W Qd' w w w JJ ❑Q F" w N QQ H ❑ ❑ JI-I d' ❑ ww WE Z N C LL r0 PP M n N NN o II1 NN NN M l(I Ir b V �i �t o N III W O W lIt N III W o b ❑N ZQ M bb M 10 M bb O M bb bb M M w v III I[1 M M M III W r �t III ILI I!I l(I 1[1 M W N MM I(1 III ^I MM �t III MM MM M O z In Oo 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 ]O o Oo o a0 0 00 0 0 00 0o o O OZ , III nn M .. nr M o rr rr 01 • U Q o CO o O o 00 o r uoo 00 0 > y x d.... ., .. .. .., d.... O.. ❑ w I o E O N O U O O U CC O o d O o U CC LL o 0 \ H I N O N N N Z N N Z N N N N ❑ N N N N O N N YQ I \ U\\ \ I -I\ \ III M Mr.\ \ NMM r\\ \ \ U❑ , III IIIM W III UIII IIIIII III N ZIIIIII JN III W N Z N N N d N J N Z N N N N N\\ U\ \ 2 \ O \ \ \ \ J \ O \ \ \ \ U .. .. ., ., .. 0.. .. .. .. .. .. .., K.. .. d.... M O f 0 0 o W. N O Q O O o o U 0 0 ? 0 0 MO UO z 0 y U U Z O MCC o O F'O omo o O WOO 000 UO 1-10 (p O d'00 O 20 ZO �00 O w0 WOO WOO JO ^O I N O � W Z sZ Z . P w E •O I O w W r K w 0 d O 0 a o Z I U 0 ❑ Z U Q ❑ d G � z O W z Z w ❑ Z f" z U F a-OWOI Z.. f. .+.. Wb a.. w In U l❑ W Z I FI .. Z� .. E P E III M •ZS QO QOO i0 WC 0. CDOO Jr -I d.. p00 JOO F^O d0 .. I WU d'M d'MM ❑M WM LLM rIMM rIM OM ZMM ZMM ZM M p Q I>> U O O 19 10 2 O x O O 2 O MO N O O M O O N H I O o 00 O O O o0 0 0 o0 00 \ J Z I > III P I•'I I �C O O O O O .. .. O o O N10 o O O O O O O O 000 O O O \ oM a I W O O O O p p C E N r O 9Q I N MN J � O Ifl III p •• W P M M OP�i N �t �f III m WSI OU OO M". mO 'y �t n �? d'6O I ZFI o�i raOP rb Nb �Y .. 1111I1 � .. M Vb�t Obb �1ti �1 QK 00, Mr1 Orn MO o0 .+N M.c ON M. o1I . bbN ..b NM 0.. ..C.0 Co0o C. OPW CM OP 000 OPNP oo OV w❑F I EE o� p~ KKM wH oP CNN ON Oti OP 0.. .. C�1' O.. ONN O..Q O.. ' C. d d U 1 > O W 0r NZ NO1 Q qa1 a .rz I LLQ I W 2 0 1I1 0 0 0 o U1 1I1 O o 0 o O m m o 0 0 .I .i o o �0 N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O 99 O n O O Ur 1 W Z `O N N 2 O I .n �0 m m .+ .1 1O V M1 1[1 N P P 1I11I1 O N N O O N l/l M1 v v 2 1 M M .y rl I 0 N N N rl O W r 0 z N1 • t x1 Mt z rt :k � � > 0! W y J J J J J W J N J J J J J J Q W Q Q Q Q Q Z w Q Q W r r W r r r r LL r r r r W r r 2 O O CO O O O XO O \ O P P O O O r1 O O r U r r r Q r z r r O I-1 r N r r N r r r J r r J 2 1 O h O r O O O Jh O W O 00 0 0 0 0 Z h OY O O I O q �+ q O NJ q O J'1 FI I Z w Z z q Z z r 1-I Z LL Z N N 2 J z w Z h z Z QO r 1 W O W W W J W W Zq W O w W U W O W 09 W W >N Zh 1 0 > r > W > W > > Uy > J > » > w > U > zm > > O\ W r1 I Z U 0! mm rK 1 q NQ o NN q hN U H K 1-I z mm Z LL E (0 2 Z Z iC N W U m w O q 1 r Z W QO W 00 r Z m0 W W N rl X h K Uq > UU N Ir OJ 6' OL LL N N O mm O O N I 1 o N lIl M �t �i 1I1 M �D �0 0 Z Q 1 .� III m O w tIl M �t �T X mm W 1I1 .'IM N W v v v V M �t 1II If1 III 1I1 IIf �? �t �1' M mm z o o O o o Ow o nn P O om 0 0 om o NnM1 M1 m OZ I o m o O O O Z O. n M M I11 M M rl N I Vrl '1 rl rl r1 rl .1 rl rl '1 rl N ' Q O O O o O 00 O U00 O O O� O n .r .'I .'1 .-I .rV Itt O � � � .i •'� •� J O W N W o- o N No moo WN N M0o a \r I N N N N N WN NN N NN N y Q 1 \ \ \ \ \ W \ \ \ N \ \ J \ \ \ \ U \ III III III III III III III 111 0!I111f1 UO 1 JI21 111 N NJw W N N N N N ^NN N WNN aN N JN 2 \ \ W\ \ \ Z\\ \ W\\ U1\ \ \\ \ U ..� .+ 2 .y Z .+ Uo o ro Yo zo ro0 jo 0= wo o wo Foo Q Y 2 Z MO O ^O JO WO moo 1-i0 ZOO 70 WO OO U. Q (p O Z O Y O m O r O moo O r O W O O r O J O U O O U O Q 01 Q I ^ W Z h N w O p z W z .a rr 0 > Q O H r z OL Z N OL Z z 1 W z W m N N O W Q r Q P W 1 Z• 0 1 I -I r L Y zz ? U =m m 0 0 1 Q O Z 1 h N O W M1Za U O r Q O J U Q O~ W N W z Q 1 OKO 1 Nit M.1N-1 �t NP QN WM1n Jm zcT WO r1M Po n r1 U 1 Qwz I M OM >m ZM 2.1 WNN 1II qOo 1 v Jo YmP WN r .y 1 Z2 mo UO d'0 2O 1.+ I -I .'I .'1 N1oN.'1 Uoo X. w 1 WU M QM QM OM WMo M QMM QM WM OMM �M 6 p Q 1> O no Im no no Y o Y 0 0 Jo J O O J O J OO J O O J O f N r 1 O O O o O O 00 O 00 O \ J Z I > N M'i 1 O o 0 o O o 0 o O O oQ \ M O I W O o 0 0 o (06 1 No \ �T J 1 W No P M m q •• w P UI P 1f1 m m N N n O .1 o P lIl WELL 1 OU W �? P POO mN NIII m•+�t NBC N KQO 1 Z0 �i P.'I nO r1 V Qm' 00 1 NM r10 P Irn OM1 m o MNo n0 NN 011l .i 00 �T hOY 1 q>Z 1 MN oP M1I1 �t `D `L �D o0. mP .1 No Oc O.�I O.N 10# 0 wor 1 Zz 0�1 00 OP ON On OM1n o.-i O.y .i OAT oo OON Oq O ww. I W. ON ON OM Om OP ONN Om Ohm ON O.� OWIfI OJ O O,L� hhU1> 1 M.ON o.n ON oV OMM O� oJJ o.n ON oWV oW O r ❑ W NZ ❑, N❑I w 0 U � O Q O ¢ I a � � z I Q Iwx m N r v v Y O O rl ti O O O O o O o O M M rl 1I1 In O O If1 �0 r'I N N ur .. W Z I r r m m O o o m 1I1 m o o M M o o e 2❑ I N N m m N N N N N I 0 N p N ti O W r Y J J J J J J J J J J J J u ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a w I- r � � � �-• r N � � f- � �- 2 ❑ 0 a o o a o o z 0 z 0 w o I ❑ z o ❑ ❑ ❑ o .. ❑ ❑ z ❑ ❑ a ❑ Q ❑ Jti H I K Z a Z 0' Z Z C Z Z ¢ Z J Z Z Z z m Z E Z > ¢o r 1 o W 3 w O w w o w W W o w 3 W W w w N Ed I F > ¢ > H > > H > > > > > Q > 2 > NN > f > K\II FW- K K ❑ ❑ O W Q W n1 .. m �•IU I 1' a d' z K z LL z 3 Hd Q .a W I N J N LL N LL O J a 1' LL tJ. W O O I Z ILL > W I -I d rZ-I S' IS -I C' ❑ LL U U ow O K• 00 ❑ LL o .r O N M .+ N .1 I~ -I O V b v O �T o O N 1I1 v O N M M M O M O W M M M O M v p LL x rl rl .-I ti W III 1I1 m N 1I1 �t ltl N M .I .1 .1 F M rl N O M O rl v v O v O N no. o 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 00 0 O Z I M M M N ^� u •+ �" " " o 0 0 0 z N rl '1 r.l w rl ^I Q M rl rl rl rl Owl o 0 o W o 0 o Z o o e o O o 0 \f. I N N N 6'N N N NN N N N NN N UP, III lIt UI eC In N III H m N m Itt 1[1 m W W N N N N N N ZN N N N NN N W ti rl ti .y .+ .y O O O Mo O O LLO C'O O O 00 O Y > H UO Z QO NO O KO O O Wo fo o 00 O m 6'O p0 o Wo Yo o Jmo 30 zO o 00 0 N o Z. W z a z Jo z > o m a O W J W O. QOZ I d J 3 00. Op d Z LL K O U n J 1 0 ti W ww H O q Q N a oKO I r om N�f Wr P Z. N hN d'10 OV Urltl zr U I mwz I I-P 00 OO -IN JP W.a HN Zv Wv FM I-i�N f0 .n IZS KO ❑.+ Wti J.+ JO W-1 NO ❑0 30 WO .n I WU QM UM WM I-iM OM OM OM OM OM M LLMM ZM o Q I>> E O E oe E oe E oe E o0 E oe Elm Z o E o0 Zoe O o0 0 ❑ o N r l O O \ J Z I > I21P1"I I# O O O O O O NM7 I O O O pv O Q p O O O O Orlti O \ M Q I W O O O\ O O O •�E I N I \ eo o UI¢I x WW P Q M .iNv oP ELL I OU III~ '+v r -im mN N 0� ti v VI �1mP MP p'¢0 1 =Ir NO NN ATM Cl= IIIO ti Mr O N �0 .1w 00 1 �?rl N I III r1 00 PO Olfl If1O r�O ADO O =MW O.+ 6 f9Y ❑>Z I yr 00 oti �O rl ol-I NO vN �i0 N�0 r1 W OF• ZZ 00 Orl 00 O# 06' OV o> OM oN O orr Orl (r p.•ly WlyI ON OO Orl OJ OQ OPv QH OHO OTC Ov OXim or I O N O N O N O m O> O)L5 m ❑ W ❑ Z Z I oq W I (r I -I 0 1 a ❑a1 d �rz 1 LLQ � W 2 mm III b b b b o00 o MM b o 0 0 0 Awn M M M M M M o ]C b O O UH I W Z I Om In M M III W v M 1� ••� r1 W w rl r O P P P If1 W b b 2❑ I 01.. M I'm r P P P P bP.. b Ifl IIl m m m m 2N N III .. .. b b IIIbm O b b r M M . I M N IN N O W Q w 3 y J J J NO J J J J J J J J U a a a z2z a a a a a a a a w r H H Z0 2 O O O Qw< 0 a 0 0 00 O O O U o F F F- ZNz f 00 f x 1- 0 I .� ZMZ HO i zIX I -I m o w N K d' O W❑ d' LL K Y d' Z O: 0 N 0 K 0 J Z I o 1 O o O O O\O O> O 6 O " O O O O N O Oa0 O Ix ❑ 0 LLQLL ❑ O H 0 q a ❑ q J O ❑ ❑ L' o J.. H NO Z Q Z Z ❑ Z UI Z Z C Z Z Z ZZZ Z Q Z W Z 2 Z Qo f 1 zo w 3 W N W JZY w w W 0 w w 000 w Z w 3 w b w >N Sd I ON > Q > ❑ > JOL > ZZ > H > w > t. I -I. > U' > O > M > O\ W•. I K QLLE I-12 U d' NNN f+ r d'I11 1-K I Hw K a 2Q❑ N ❑ Q www N 1[1 m dN I-IU I SM Q U JJ ow w r III❑o❑ LL v In N I W Q J Y 1 1 Q.. W I 1-L J m MZZ WLL N LL f z >I- LL # M o 1 wW r. O QQ W Z O UOU d' Y U w WIX d U, UIK hl N OZO 1- d d ❑LL rnr O O V 1-0O ..N .. M -1 M I 0o wOo 00 b O v O 000 N � M ZQ WW M M M MIAM N M M w vv M In vMM MIA M �T MMM M v X .... .+ v P .... .y .y .i N w Min In N tiMM mm W .. II mm MID v v vc� A IIImO v W v f PP N mv�t ..N M O bbb b O IN Z mm o 0 000 0o O o ooM o o In O- r r o IJ U O o O 0. 0 o m m m Z o 0 O Z I rl rl M In rzi III r r IM M M ¢ Mo 0 0 �000 00 0 0 000 ¢M o SM 0 N d d w qw I oo O M eC Co. No o M QM 0 ^bM \ F I U N N N N N N N N N N W N N NNN N N d• N N N X Q 1 Z \ \ \ \ w \ \ \ w \ \ F- \ \ \ \ \ F \ W \ U q I N N III IN In U N III III U' III III I -MO N N III N N II1 U' II1 Z N W NN N N IrNNN d'NN ON N NNN ZN QN ZN 2 Z \ \ \ W \ > \ \ \ ¢ \ \ J \ \ \ \ \ Z \ 0 F \ Q \ M W o 0 o U o o = 0 O N 0 0 0 UI oN O ? O Y z N Z I U O O M O ^ O O O O W.0 U O O O O O J O O N O m ❑ O O O W O N o O O W.0 OO O W O U O O O J O on Zo O z Z U Z I W N d' J O 1- . LL 3 ~ 0 •O 1 Z 6 d d j K LL 3 a w O LL I Z z I U Q Z w U C'! O N H p O ILN Z J 2 .. J I W Z N F. I -I N m O Q r Od'O I a�T �t me I-M F-�tMM LNIN Sm Opt U-.. .. met ;4 •.. U 1 qwZ I NOO WO ZM NN00 dNN 2P UIf1 .. .. .. IL M Zb a I ZS d•.•1 ,.. ;.. MO rr..00 J.. .. NO Xo LLOOo d.. Zo 60 W 1 I w U IQ M M O M K M L' M M M Q M M Q M Q M M M M M W M 0,0 Y M 2 d00 d0 d0 LOOM MOO WO wm d'Oo0 d'O CO K00 N N f I O 00 O O 000 00 Ino Oo0 o O \ J Z I > No"' 1 u o o M o In M o 0 NM❑ I \ M O I W 0 O O O O O O O O O O o ..E I N o UIQI J I M M t t ❑.• W N r ml .N-I rM O M MW N r .�•I WELL I OU .+ N M N.+b ob b Ncc� Pm P �t x<O I Zr. In or v.. b Qd' 001 0 mP Oft mmI w NOM � -I CIO MOoO NM 01` o IN �^cz dU1 Y q>2 I Iftm •'. OM 00 .'IMMM O.. f� O1� MID 00..0 � m OIL IIIO O WOI-1ZZ Om 0.. OM OPPP Ovm 00 OV Oti.'I .I M. 00 On ww .I WI -I 000 0.. 00 O� Cc ONm ON OAT o000 ON O.. ON'0 .0 JL 0.. oMMM ON 0.. 0...... M.. Ob ON o Pv111 m rb M 1I1 III O O r r .-IPm�OrNPN�iOr O M M Y O O o O O O O O O N n �1' ."� m O o O m m .a .i Ifl r .i I!1 111 ILl Itl b Orb m UI N N vb0 o rIn M O O m m b b MMrr.+rMmPPrb b v v wr. WZ O m O m O 111 O l[I Nbr b bo r O O N N m m mONrVM. bM�iM m y �t xM I m m '•r rl r1 ^1 .•I O N ❑ N ti 0 W r Q ❑ Y � W S rU d N y W J Z� O 01 > N L d O ON W M I zIn dN I-IU � O o ❑ � w � z• OLL r O O O 00 � za O W d X m W N N r o Z o 0 o O O Z I o U U � a o rl W + ❑ W I O U p I Ilt W N 2 \ U .1 0 Y 2 0 m o P a� .1 F1 Z I W 0 0 aoz w LL I Z S U I p W Z Q N .a I Zx WO O a I>> N O N r I O O \ J Z I > IflPr i # N M O I p o \Mp�w o M Z I N o U' Q I J W U Ka0 I ZI-I .IP Q K 00 1 O P dg ❑>Z I NII1 Wor ZZ OM d' I Ww'-,00� d du > I J J J J J J J J J a a a a a a a r r r r r r N r r0 0 O O Z U' O O O O 0 O W r M I"1 E w w K K K 2ZS wK K Y C d' ............ O O U a L O O O O d O K O J J J J J J J J J J J J O O ❑ ❑ Z N" O ❑ W ❑ ❑ W ❑ d d d d d d d d d d d d O ❑ z z o w z zZ z z z z r z dddddddddddd z z w W J\r w 00 W a W O w N W »»»»»» w W > > Y a w > > z > U > W > > > N N N N N N N N N N N N W W W W W W W W W W W W Z POW COLD w w r UUUUUUUUUUUU Ilt ❑ OOwx r Z .r H H •r r1 n1 I-i r1 .+.r r1 rr Ilt LL J Y mw U N W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL # W = WU K 6' W Z > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y z xmc.l .+.. s .+ w o0000000000o r O N M o N N v M M O O O O O M O O o O O O v O O m m 1l1m M I!1 111 Ill III M M Ill If. It. M 1I. W . . lf. 1f. ❑ ❑ 1I. v N 1l1 Ill .y M M .•� 1l1 I11 .-� 1I1 1f1 Ifl 1/1 .+ N N N N b b � N c v c o NMN vet m N M MOOmmO.+oO=0- O 0 00000O00000 0 o =MO Oo 0 o O o00000000000 0 O O O O MO ti r1 rl n rl rl .-1 rl rl rl r1 .M rl ••I Mo. rl rl .Y rl N 0 00 0 0 0 000000000000 0 r1 ^1 r1 rl rl ^I 'i .1 rl r1 N M rI r-1 rl ti .-1 rl ti rl rl ILI U rl No. r1 '1 'I rl rl mO=MO=O=NMNO N O O O m O O O O U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N 1/1 III I!1 Ifl U1 III N 1[1 1l1 Ill O I[1 r1 1I1 U N N N N U N N N W N d N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N Z \ \ \ \ Y \ \ \ O \ O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O \ W ❑O 0 00O d00 m LLo Yo LD0000000000OO Fo ¢ d 0 0 0 0 O O U o o 0 O N¢ o O O o O o O o O O o 0 7 o r 0 00o oo No Qo 3o a000000000000 ¢o Q J m Z S Q b w K ❑ > w H W UI m J ❑ U w ELL .. s ❑ � Q r etl d r-� LL N N W o w z QO rrrr xO0 ❑M Z.+ J111m m1111/1P mO.rNmlll Wr >. K N N N r O O Z b NO O N P d O P P m 0 .y P N N N P o Z v J rOm 00 M. Q.IPPO.�.i P.i .a •+Pti 00 Z =M Z M M M M M OM 00 d M r M N N M M M N M M M N M r M 0 N o N o 0 o N O O WO N o WO N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 N 0 000 00 0 0 0 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z .1 �?OmP bIf1M CI Pm PO 1I1 NO r 0 M N b lfl Oltly �t OOb .43,1 vw OMN Om OK 0 0 O P O O O O O N N Oo O a O M Off? o.a .n .y ONN Olft O> oN 0 �1rrbM Mtfl l/1 �t rlbm r rvminrrvmrro m .+Mbrmtivbm.+m m P1l1r POPIIIV PP1f1r v q'ti �ibP�t .+rbv.ab o mrrmmmrmmmrr o vvvvvvvvvvvv O M M M M M M M M M M M M O O 0 0 P M O 1l1 v v O 111 P O O 1l1 O pv.....® 0j� O .1 ❑ w 0 N Z N � W 1 (rH0 1 UI IO�21 Q ❑ Q I a ��z I LL Q W 2 I O no O y b' v rr lfl b b NIIIbMtibt[IObM N OOOO000.0 o P P o O on O urn ....... Wz I O O rM H .+ H NbMl MM.Nmm P om=mN. Ml m m P P 111 w If1M m 2❑ I P P �o Ul v HMNNbNNnCN .-I Ob�1'�ib M1I1 b 111 P P m m �v �` m rl .d r1 .1 O N N N O W F y J W J J J J J Q Q < a U a H a a Q C = o r o 0 0 ❑ z c o o w o 0 �- N LL KKZ U LL H LL' w x w R' LL' J Z O Fz O LL O O 00 0 H ZzU 0 N O Z a O ❑ Za ❑ a ❑ O ZUILL -wUU ❑ ❑ m ❑ ❑ JH H I 2 OJ Z U Z N Z 00 NmW f Z 4- Z Z Z a p N I W U LL W N W W W N J N M W Z wow H N > > > > W Q W Q W W >N YLLI J > > ❑ > ❑ > wm##LLWLLLLLL WQ Q III FK I ❑ U oufH.0 K I ❑❑ LLN HUI LL ❑w J NN aHNNH oN0 K r ZZ NNNNNNHN LL\ N I I W 2ZZZZZWZZZ NJ - LLnMn W JZ U f.9f. l-i UI UI UI <. UI ID Wm❑❑<0LL' -# F- ww o ❑ w 7W w HHHHI-I F'IaHHH w❑JJaOF-��'- a ❑ ww w ❑ �Ur ❑ NNNNNNmwwo WLLooxuNNN 3 < .. N O O O m O o m O P O 0 0 F O O O .�.+ O vet vet Vet Pill �l �l mNNNmNNNN I!1 O ❑ N I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 O O Z Q M N N v b b b b b b b b b b b N N N M N N N N w v MM M III 1I. . . .m1l11I. .UI 1f. . . . . . . . . v . LL x bb M MMMMMMMMMM IfIHHHHNNNN 1I1 M vv W IflV�tvvb'v V�tvv �vVv��vvv v N MM f O HH v MMMMMMMMMM mwwww�ml/ m III m 00 Z p on O OOOOOOOOon mo.o=f11I11fm O o 00 DOI O on O p o O O O o p o O O o o O o n o o O o 0 0 0 0 OZ I O Ubb n rnrnrnnnrn Mm1I1 m 1111111/1 Ifl 111 M o MM u zll I III11111� I111 u H ..., .. .�..... .. ...... ..... ., .....�..I.:, Q o p m o O o 0 o n 0 o O p o O o o O o o m o O z m M no Itl U f z a ❑WI n woo o NNNNNNoNN OOOOOONNN LLo O Om N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL' N N N N W y Y \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O \ \ \ \ 2 U❑ U1I1 e!}Illm If1 U1I1 Ill Ifl l21 m 1l1lllll N Nlllllllllllllllll Ulll W If1N H W Z N N N N Z NNNNNNNNNN N N N N N N NNN N N N N N N - 2 U 1 0.4 ZHH .4 .i .1 .iH H.d .-1 .4H .i .d H.4O. Con Jn •'I on H -to .00 O IN O O O O O O O O O O noon O O O O O OO O O 2 y O O Ul Z 1- o Z O O O O o O O o o O O O O O U O O o O O o O O O a o 0 m H o a o 0 0 < p o o m o 0 noon Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o o Y o 0 W P Q I N J H w J Z z LL K Z F z-W a rr X.M .o� z a a a a o O I Q O Z I H > m O N y u 6 o z .. "I Z a W z � Z ❑ z Y H J .w Z Q I O C O I H m Q N M W N - w w w o o o 0 o 0 0 Q M �T W U I❑ W Z I J �i W b N W M N P P P O O m 0 J 0 0 0 J P P P H H P P P H f 1l1 m P J H H J IZX Z O W o H N O LL P P P m O o 0 0 0 0 ❑ P P P H H P P P H H O P J .+.-I H M M O N N N M W M M ... M M LL' N N N M M N N N M 2 M N N I W u ❑ M W Q M M Q O Q I>> On F o o H o h o O o m o o O o o o H O o O o o O o o O 7 o O O > O O > N H I O O on O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O o \ J Z I > I(1 P H# O o O O o N M❑ I O p p G G p p o O o \ M O I W o H E I N rO Ill �t el m J I Pv wo �m ❑ .. W O WELL I OU M MIl10 N nOMNP01l1mMm0 OnNPPJHPbP M �1m m M Ka0 I ZH Ill Mmo 1I1 1I1rmPbry m�T �1'll1 bHPmOaPbPm V MN H LL (AY I O>Z I OH Or-1 .1 MM OPPPmmPmmmm OMomow o00 Illm Om bvv O O b O b b W O !- I Z Z o r O H O no O H H H H H H H H ." ^ o O 0 o O Z o 0 o 0 o M O ww" WH O� OF-F OM 00O.4H.-IH0000 obbbbKbbbb OM ON LLLLU,> o ❑ b W M r N Z � P w 1 ywO 1 co �o�zr v a ❑a� N a �rz b �LLQ 00 o P�tOrN N Oo o � � p W ObO b wMltly MO y eo o M1MPP�t �? Oo a n r N N Of0O 00 MbN�t bb WZ. N P� 1I1 r r OItI I[I O PN�tN On 2 M 0 0 w M M M M M O y r N [O W N N o M M1 w r b M1 P wMP o P bO UO . NN �? N lfl wit b O O ON�t r v v N P w w q' Q, Hni w N b w w O N N N 0 w H Y J J a Q Q Q Q Z O zzz O O O O U u O r u H w w w > > r N M Z M zz rZi L N N K d' � W � C J , 2 NN 0 UUU O O H O f O U U O w O i W W ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ N ❑ w w ❑ uu Jw UU Z JJJ Z Z U' Z Y Z 6'J 2' Z aO r i ww W JJd0.1 W W w W N W W > N d i » uuu > w W W1'1'W > > J > > U U u > wR' ON Ww l d'K Zz R O JW' pp Mir WW dN U r NN d\ 00 U O Wz 00 Nr zzzzz N U. zzz Qw Ws 6a000 NN ❑ U' ZWZ U'NHrUi p p� Qa JJJJJ WW Z w Q°° Ja W WW aaaaa 0❑ J ❑ nW, NNNN R' MLL .-. rrr bbbb rp rM1 NNNNN nr M OOO �t �t �t �? ❑ N N N b b b b b m m w M N N N b b b b Q MM mmmmm m mmm mm d MM nww.rw ww w N w.+.•� w.rww X ww MMMMM ,n mm M .+ If1MM MMMM w vv vv.r vv in v � vvv vvv.r H vv vVvv� ww �1 O occ MMMM o O O O O o O Do. 00 00000 6I (O O O 000 0000 r O 2 r ti w r n M1 M1 r w .. n O M M1 r n r n M1 i U r Q o O O o O O o O O o O O O O O O O O Y M MO w WOO Ww w Qww.+ w.y ow. MO OoOcO W O O U O o O O O O 00o WNN NNNXNN HNN wN N NNN NNNN O Y Q r 2\ N N N N\\ Q N N >\ \ \\\ \ N\\ W N N N NNN N U N N W N ON N N N Z NNN N 2 ^\\ NNNNN O\N ON �N ZNNN w\\\\ woo w00000 Qoo Qo zo 0000 N0000 Y 2 Z 0.0 Q O O O O o O O w o O o O O O W O o O o m Koo w00000 aoo =o �o U000 w0000 P a i W U Q a N w w r 2 O F Z r W I- N W z O U M P W. 2 •O K M LL K W Z O O a O Z Q a J O J w 6 z u w w J r K Y 0 a a,OWO wmv aOocc+rr ❑r Xr ow.y KOOOo U . ❑WZ : J.y .a HOoOOo L4NN Jlfl ON Sw.•rw aOOOO .� i Z2 Jo0 ZOOwnw m"�"'� „yM WM MMMM MMMMM w i W U O.00 Q M M w MMMM M W M M N O Qr>M >MO >ooaoO 3OO 3O Xo Y000 N, 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ J Z > Nl M=l. a p O O O O N O O Q O O O O O \ M O r W O C�Q r O O J i bM1OVN M a0 .i w ❑ W .� O w w m w t[1 .� M W S o, O U o w M N r MO w Ca❑ISD M.+O MAIL NN NPW OP Om �� mpWPN ad. Do, 0ww �POO OYtO �1N On OO�TMM wof.ZZ ozu oiii.i , om M.C. OO NN yKw Ww 'p 000000 OOO o� 0m o! OOw O.iti.i .Ni 1:04. 0 3 2 9 z Q o Z Z O H � ml- OQ r a= Q\ U 2 N H i r q K 0 d w z z w w a z z N W Z U Q Hd' O F � > M Z Zf r rr N M Q J H W Z O d .. > u u w z W W f E y .+ aQ zo Z q O N u\ Y r o U Q O Q qw \ H =M F Z W U o K N > Z O �+ wJ 03 OVi i J 1 N W Y O W N U Q F W O U Q 2 P q d'U IfIO ,d o mo ~ o H J > O O p a W O Jd •❑ o d o Wy w \ oz o Z qO• o > O r o O .. H � � W o Z Y U W z W ' O N(O . f O O' u O Z ' m UO t p UH O arz 0 aaa' dw > JJJ ww .�JJJ d• O UO �t P N NZZZ +O 1 Y W Y. o v .f Q mow. O N e oXmO o W O N Z N U N = O O O H > K .0 d ow o a w q N J \q H mPl � \J y P 6 mm-Hf 1 wo .\ib oy zOzaQ� mutmulm N W L Q O U O' N K C, Wa d 6 o O »7 QN Z sz Q wwwl rc z dd 000. e. 0330 N Cl m ra v Z Z 0 w 2 r (� W Q W Q m C oz \ � u Z y r o z 0 a w z w m s O m z P y wz m u¢ m or o > o Z Z r o Q J W a r w 1 W W U . QQ O Z q ON y \ OC Ou 1 r 1 r p a ow 2\ r Z2 U Zr W i 1 MO K y > J LL J O S o N Ir WY ob J W N U N ar W O U Q 2 P O OCU PO Q z N r z 2W w 1 o J > 1 00 'J m O O O Q W O > r O as oa \ J0. •q o a o LL y W \ O r 1 O Z r0 O u UU a W, rl tl 1 LL W J 1 W � W N O m U 1 K = Q 1 z LL 1 v Z Y 1 W W Z N m, t 2n of U O Z , N U O o o aaa� awl > JJJ 1 HIq l .1 .•IJJJ 1 U0 mu 1 O u NU l 1 r-1 P U I y Q N 2 2 Z 1 W Y I O MOW- N o u1\a¢Q I e .+�SZL b q O o\ w W a r o a ON N N M M 1-1 y .•1 M N4 wz"ww. \M onIr , WO \a mo mo rr , �o .. O(J muwwo 1 rM 1 OW W W , r r •• Z1 w Q=UMMLL 1 Ow S 1 d•Q d 'IJ Q K O m m m 1 zu W MW WWW 1 rq N U' as woo 1 0'IN 31 COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE T-itf 4 4 a" February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Second Reading and Adoption Of Ordinance No. 485 Adopting the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 485 on second reading. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: None. The expenditures for the Fifth Amendment have been budgeted in the Redevelopment Agency's 2010-201 1 budget. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On January 18, 2011, the City Council moved to take up Ordinance No. 485 on first reading. The City Council further moved to introduce Ordinance No. 485 on first reading. The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 485 carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, Mayor Adolph NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None V32 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt Ordinance No. 485 on second reading; or 2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 485 on second reading; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, h 1� Veronica J. M ino�y Clerk D Approved for submission by: CEvnsvt4� oma P. Genove e, City Manager 0 ::33 ORDINANCE NO. 485 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 2 PROJECT AREA NO. 2 - FIFTH AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta ("City" or "City Council") approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 ("Redevelopment Plan"), by Ordinance No. 139 on May 16, 1989, as amended by Ordinance No. 259 on December 20,1994 and Ordinance No. 399 on February 3, 2004, Ordinance No. 403 on March 16, 2004 and Ordinance No. 404 on March 16, 2004; and WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") has initiated proceedings to adopt the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan ("Fifth Amendment") to add approximately 12.42 acres ("Added Area") to the Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 ("Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the California Community Redevelopment Law ("CRL") (California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) permits the adoption of amendments to redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received from the Agency the Report of the Agency prepared pursuant to Section 33352 and Section 33457.1 of the CRL ("Report to City Council") on the proposed Amended and Restated Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 ("Amended and Restated Plan"), which includes a description and discussion of the proposed Fifth Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Manager's Department -Development Services Division has determined that the Fifth Amendment is Categorically Exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15320 (Class 20) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta has submitted to the City Council its certification that the Fifth Amendment conforms to the La Quinta General Plan; and V34 Ordinance No. 485 5' Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 2 WHEREAS, a community meeting was held at the City Council Chambers in City Hall on January 10, 2011, to provide citizens an opportunity to provide input and ask questions of staff regarding the proposed Fifth Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on January 18, 2011 , concerning the adoption of the Fifth Amendment; and WHEREAS, notice of said joint public hearing was duly and regularly published as required by the CRL and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk of the City and Secretary of the Agency; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by first- class mail to the last known assessee of each parcel of land in the Project Area and Added Area, at his or her last known address as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Riverside and were mailed to all property owners, residents, and business in the Project Area at least thirty (30) days prior to the joint public hearing; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with a return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from property in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency has adopted on November 2, 2010 its Resolution No. RA 2010-010 approving and adopting the Report to the Council on the Fifth Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and submitting the Report to City Council to the City Council; and WHEREAS, Section 33457.1 of the CRL, provides that to the extent warranted by the Fifth Amendment, this Ordinance shall contain the findings required by Section 33367 of the CRL; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Report to City Council for the Fifth Amendment, and has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard, and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Fifth Amendment. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 0 7: 3 5 Ordinance No. 485 51" Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 3 Section 1. The purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area including, without limitation, the Added Area annexed by the Fifth Amendment, include but are not limited to accomplishment of the following: a. To remedy, remove, and prevent physical blight and economic obsolescence through implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. b. Improve and/or provide electric, gas, telephone, water, and wastewater facilities to both developed and subdivided undeveloped properties within the Project Area. Address inadequate street improvements and roads that vary in width and degree of improvement as they cross the Project Area. Alleviate inadequate drainage improvements that constrain the development of various parcels in the Project Area, the cost of which cannot be borne by private enterprise acting alone. c. Recycle and/or develop underutilized parcels to accommodate higher and better economic uses, improving the financial viability of the City. Address parcels of property that are inadequately sized for proper usefulness and development and which are held in divided and widely scattered ownerships. d. Promote the rehabilitation of existing housing stock. Increase, improve, and preserve the supply of housing affordable to very low-, low- and moderate - income households. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The finding that the Added Area is noncontiguous to the Project Area and is necessary for effective redevelopment. This finding is based upon the following conditions which are more fully set forth in the Report to City Council: i. The Added Area will be used for the construction and rehabilitation of low- and moderate -income housing; ii. The Added Area is not included as a part of the Project Area for the purpose of obtaining tax increment; and iii. The Agency will not use the power of eminent domain in the Added Area. b. The Fifth Amendment will allow continued redevelopment to occur within the Project Area in conformity with the CRL and in the interests of the public health, safety, and welfare. This finding is based in part, as set forth in the record including but not limited to the Report to City Council, upon the fact 0 '36 Ordinance No. 485 5" Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 4 that the Fifth Amendment will enable the Agency to preserve and enhance existing affordable housing, to develop new affordable housing, and aid the Agency in meeting its affordable housing obligations under the CRL. c. The adopting and carrying out of the Fifth Amendment is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based upon the fact that the Agency will be authorized to seek out and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including but not limited to property tax increment; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance will depend upon the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increment generated by new investment in the Project Area; and that under the Fifth Amendment as proposed, no new redevelopment activity will be undertaken within the Added Area unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity. d. The Fifth Amendment conforms to the La Quinta General Plan including, but not limited to, the Housing Element, thereof, which substantially complies with the requirements of Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code. This finding is based upon the following facts: i. The land uses proposed in the Fifth Amendment conform to the land uses approved in the La Quinta General Plan; ii. The financing mechanisms proposed by the Fifth Amendment establish a mechanism for achieving the goals of the General Plan, many of which may not be implemented, without redevelopment assistance; and iii. The findings of the Planning Commission that the Fifth Amendment conforms to the General Plan. e. The carrying out of the Fifth Amendment will promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City of La Quinta and will effectuate the purposes and policies of the CRL. This finding is based in part, as set forth in the record, including but not limited to the Report to City Council, on the fact that the Fifth Amendment will benefit the Project Area by continuing to provide the Agency the financial resources to correct conditions of blight including but not limited to improving, increasing, and preserving affordable housing opportunities to enable the Agency to meet its affordable housing obligations under the CRL. f. The Agency's authority to initiate proceedings to acquire real property by the exercise of the power of eminent domain expired on or about May 16, 2001, 0 Al Ordinance No. 485 5' Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1. 2011 Page 5 and thus the Agency is not currently authorized to acquire real property with respect to the Project Area by the power of eminent domain and the Agency is not establishing eminent domain authority in the Added Area. g. The Agency has a feasible method and plan for relocation of families and persons who may be displaced, temporarily or permanently from housing facilities in the Added Area. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 139, found and determined that the Agency adopted a feasible method and place for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area, if the Redevelopment Plan should result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area. The Fifth Amendment does not alter the Method of Relocation and will adhere to the Method of Relocation for the Project Area. h. There are, or are being provided, within the Project Area or within areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families or persons who may be displaced from the Added Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the fact that no person or family will be required to move from any dwelling unit in the Added Area, until suitable replacement housing is available. The City Council, in Ordinance No. 139, found and determined that families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to the CRL Sections 33411 and 33411 .1 , and dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income, if any, shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan. The Added Area is noncontiguous to the Project Area and is necessary for effective redevelopment, as set forth in the record, including but not limited to the Report to Council, on the fact that the Added Area is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of taxes and the power of eminent domain will not be exercised in the Added Area. The purpose of adding the Added Area to the Project Area is to preserve and expand the City's supply of affordable housing by substantially rehabilitating and developing affordable housing in the Added Area. k. Inclusion of any lands, buildings or improvements in the Added Area which are not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare is necessary for Q ,J Ordinance No. 485 WAmendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 6 the effective redevelopment of the whole area of which they are a part, and any such areas are not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such areas without substantial justification for their inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that the inclusion of the lands, buildings, or improvements within the Added Area is necessary in order to provide new and preserve existing affordable housing, including housing for low- and moderate -income persons. I. The Added Area is necessary for effective redevelopment, as set forth in the record, including but not limited to the Report to City Council. Thus, an explanation of why the elimination of blight in the Added Area cannot be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone or through other financing alternatives other than tax increment financing does not have to be provided. m. Not less than eighty (80) percent of land in the Added Area has been or Is developed for urban uses or is an integral part of one or more areas developed for urban uses that are surrounded or substantially surrounded by parcels that have been or are developed for urban uses, making the land in the Added Area predominantly urbanized. n. The limitation on the number of dollars to be allocated to the Agency in the Project Area, including, but not limited to the Added Area, are reasonably related to the proposed projects to be implemented in the Project Area and Added Area and/or benefiting the Project Area and Added Area under the CRL, and to the ability of the Agency to eliminate remaining, as set forth in the record, including but not limited to the Report to City Council. The Fifth Amendment is necessary to implement projects to continue efforts to alleviate blighting conditions, including but not limited to, improving, increasing, and preserving affordable housing opportunities to enable the Agency to meet its affordable housing obligations under the CRL. o. The time limits contained in the Fifth Amendment that pertain to the Added Area, are reasonably related to the accomplishment of the work of redevelopment. p. The implementation of the Redevelopment Plan will improve and/or alleviate the physical and economic conditions of blight in the Project Area, including but not limited to, improving, increasing, and preserving affordable housing opportunities. Section 3. The City Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three (3) years from the time occupants of the Added Area are 0 J39 Ordinance No. 485 Wh Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 7 displaced, if any, and that pending the development of such facilities, there will be available housing at rents comparable to any of those in the City of La Quinta at the time of their displacement. No persons or families of low- or moderate -income shall be displaced from residences unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced persons or families at rents comparable to those available at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and otherwise standard dwellings. The Agency shall not displace any such persons or families until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. Section 4. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the Fifth Amendment as hereby approved, the City Council hereby (a) restates its pledge of cooperation in helping to carry out the Redevelopment Plan, (b) restates its request that the various officials, departments, boards and agencies of the City having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area, including, without limitation, the Added Area, likewise cooperate to such end and exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the redevelopment of the Project Area, including, without limitation, the Added Area, (c) reaffirms that it stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan, and (d) re - declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan, as amended. Section 5. The Fifth Amendment is incorporated herein by this reference, and the Amended and Restated Plan, as amended by the Fifth Amendment, is hereby approved as, and declared to be, the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility of carrying out the Redevelopment Plan, as amended. Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the Riverside County Recorder a statement that the Fifth Amendment has been approved in conformity with the CRL. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the statement to be recorded pursuant to Section 7 of this Ordinance to such other parties as may be directed by the Agency. 0�40 Ordinance No. 485 51^ Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 8 Section 9. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after the date of final passage. Section 10. If any part of this Ordinance, or Amendment which it approves, is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of this Fifth Amendment, and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Fifth Amendment if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required bylaw. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 1" day of February 2011, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) .. 0J41 Ordinance No. 485 5' Amendment to Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Adopted: February 1. 2011 Page 9 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1 ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 485 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 18`h day of January 201 1, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 1" day of February 2011, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-1 15. VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on February , 2011 pursuant to Council Resolution. VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California M, 0J42 Twyot 4 Qaba COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of On -Site Improvements Associated with Tract Map No. 31202-1, Rancho Santana, Desert Cheyenne, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Accept on -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 31202-1, Rancho Santana, Desert Cheyenne, Inc. and authorize staff to release the performance security; direct staff to release the labor and materials security ninety (90) days after City Council acceptance of the improvements. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. No public improvements will be accepted with this action. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Tract Map No. 31202-1, Rancho Santana, Desert Cheyenne, Inc., is located south of Avenue 52 and west of Monroe Street (Attachment 1). All obligations of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for the on -site improvements have been satisfied. Attachment 2 indicates the amount of the warranty security. 0.43 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the on -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 31202-1, Rancho Santana, Desert Cheyenne, Inc. and authorize staff to release the performance security; direct staff to release the labor and materials security ninety (90) days after City Council acceptance of the improvements; or 2. Do not accept the on -site improvements associated with Tract Map No. 31202- 1, Rancho Santana, Desert Cheyenne, Inc. and do not authorize staff to release the performance security; do not direct staff to release the labor and materials security ninety (90) days after City Council acceptance of the improvements; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, 4Im othy R. Jo as o , P.E. Public Wor as or/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1 . Vicinity Map 2. Warranty Security Exhibit 0`044 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 31202-1 RANCHO SANTANA HWY 111 HWY 111 JDR.CARREON BLVD w H AVENUE 48TH w (n V) N AVENUE 50TH 0 o Liz 0 z (A fn Z N Q Oui U AVENUE 52ND SITE AVENUE 54TH VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 0'45 ATTACHMENT 2 WARRANTY SECURITY Tract Map No. 31202-1 - On -Site Improvements Development Name: Rancho Santana ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS Performance Security Improvement Description Labor & Materials Current Amount Proposed Reduction WARRANTY AMOUNT Grading $579 110 $579110 90% $57 911 Drainage $139,900 $139,900 90% $13,990 Street I m provements $450 380 $450 380 90% $45 038 Domestic Water $259900 $259900 90% $25990 Sanitary Sewer $248,280 $248,280 90% $24,828 Dry Utilities $148 800 $148 800 90% $14 880 Im ation Relocate & Replacement $181 080 $181 080 90% $18108 Perimeter Walls $199,000 $199,000 90% $19,900 Monumentation $0 $9 300 100% $0 Standard 10% Confingency $220650 $221580 100% $0 Professional Fees Design 10% $242 710 $243 730 100% $0 Professional Fees, Construdion 10% $242,710 $243,730 100% $0 No Plans Contingency 16% $388,340 $389,970 100% $0 Totals $3,300,860 $3,314,760 $220,646 0:46 Tihf 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of the Off -Site and On -Site CONSENT CALENDAR: Improvements for Amended Tract Map No. 31732, STUDY SESSION: Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc. PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) to April 7, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Palizada (Amended Tract Map No. 31732) is located south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 61, east of Monroe Street, and west of Harrison Street (Attachment 1). On April 7, 2006, the City and KB Home Coastal, Inc. entered into a SIA for Tract Map No. 31732. On July 5, 2007, the City and KB Home Coastal, Inc. entered into an Amended SIA for Amended Tract Map No. 31732. Section 6 of the SIA requires: "that the subdivision improvements shall be complete within twelve months after the approval of the original SIA. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this SIA, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of 0;47 the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the improvements.' On April 17, 2007, the City Council adopted a resolution granting a time extension for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements to April 7, 2008. On April 15, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution granting a second time extension for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements to April 7, 2010. In a letter received on January 11, 2011 (Attachment 2), the developer states a re - subdivision of this map (Tentative Tract Map 36305) was proposed as a result of the current housing market conditions and to provide an alternative site layout geared towards an active adult lifestyle. Construction of the improvements has not commenced. The developer requests a time extension to complete the entitlement process and the associated improvement plans for the re -subdivision of this map, Tentative Tract map 36305. Staff has prepared the attached resolution which provides for approval of the third time extension of the Amended SIAs to April 17, 2012. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement to April 17, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc.; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements time as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement to April 17, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, T thy R. Jo ass n P.E. Public Work ass r/City Engineer 0 `43 Approved for submission by: �� Thomas,Pr Genovese, ity Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from KB Home Coastal, Inc. received on January 11, 2011 U49 RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE OFF -SITE AND ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED AMENDED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS TO APRIL 7, 2012 FOR AMENDED TRACT MAP NO. 31732, PALIZADA WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) for Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada, on April 7, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) for Amended Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada, on July 5, 2007; and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved Amended SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the original Agreement; and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by April 7, 2010, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved Amended SIAs allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as required by the approved Amended SIA is extended to April 7, 2012. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on April 7, 2012. If the Subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. 0'50 Resolution No. 2011- Amended Tract Map No. 31732, Palizada Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 2 Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved Amended SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 1" day of February 2011, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 0,151 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 31732 PALIZADA PROJECT 51TE F w AIRPORT BOULEVARD AVENUE 60 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE .11. 0 5 2 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering Dept. 79-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247 Attn: Timothy R. Jonassen, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer RE: Amended Tract 31732 & 31733, Palizada Project at Ave 60 & Monroe Dear Mr. Jonassen: As you may already be aware, as a result of current housing market conditions and to provide an alternative site layout geared towards an active adult lifestyle, KB Home Coastal Inc. has proposed to the City of La Quinta a re -subdivision of the two existing recorded tract maps, Amended Tract Maps 31732 and 31733, into one overall map, Tentative Tract Map 36305. The new proposed subdivision Site Development Permit Plan and Tentative Tract Map have been submitted to the City of La Quinta Planning Department for pre -application review, which comments have been received back from the Planning Department and are currently being addressed internally. We do anticipate that it could be another eight to twelve months before the complete entitlement process and associated final engineering plans are complete. It is proposed that once the new subdivision improvement agreements and related bonds can be prepared and submitted to the City, based on the Tentative Tract Map 36305, these will replace those related to the original Amended Tracts 31732 and 31733 agreements and bonds. For the above stated reasons we ask that the Subdivision Improvement Agreements for the Amended Tracts 31732 and 31733 be extended for an additional two years until April of 201) If you have any questions or concerns please call me direct at 951-691-5235. Sinc a yours, Mike Freeman, VP Land and Forward Planning KB HOME Coastal Inc. KB HOME SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAICOASTAL INC Riverside e San Diego 4 Inland Valley c Orange County o Desert 36310 Inland Valley Drive; Wildomar, CA'92595 PH (951) 691-5300 5 T4hf 4 4 Quha COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of the Off -Site and On -Site Improvements for Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: J STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) to April 7, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Palizada (Amended Tract Map No. 31733) is located south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 61, east of Monroe Street, and west of Harrison Street (Attachment 1). On April 7, 2006, the City and KB Home Coastal, Inc. entered into a SIA for Tract Map No. 31733. On July 5, 2007, the City and KB Home Coastal, Inc. entered into an Amended SIA for Amended Tract Map No. 31733. Section 6 of the SIA requires: "that the subdivision improvements shall be complete within twelve months after the approval of the original SIA. Failure by Subdivider to begin or complete construction of the improvements within the specified time periods shall constitute cause for City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare Subdivider in default of this SIA, to revise improvement security requirements as necessary to ensure completion of 0"54 the improvements, and/or to require modifications in the standards or sequencing of the improvements in response to changes in standards or conditions affecting or affected by the improvements. " On April 17, 2007, the City Council adopted a resolution granting a time extension for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements to April 7, 2008. On April 15, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution granting a second time extension for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements to April 7, 2010. In a letter received on January 11, 2011 (Attachment 2), the developer states a re - subdivision of this map (Tentative Tract Map 36305) was proposed as a result of the current housing market conditions and to provide an alternative site layout geared towards an active adult lifestyle. Construction of the improvements has not commenced. The developer requests a time extension to complete the entitlement process and the associated improvement plans for the re -subdivision of this map, Tentative Tract map 36305. Staff has prepared the attached resolution which provides for approval of the third time extension of the Amended SIAs to April 17, 2012. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement to April 17, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, KB Home Coastal, Inc.; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council to extend the time for completion of the off -site and on -site improvements time as specified in the approved Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement to April 17, 2012 for Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, KB Home Coastal,, Inc; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, thy R. o ass P.E. Public Work irector/City Engineer 0 55 Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from KB Home Coastal, Inc. received on January 11, 2011 0'56 RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE OFF -SITE AND ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED AMENDED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS TO APRIL 7, 2012 FOR AMENDED TRACT MAP NO. 31733, PALIZADA WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) for Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, on April 7, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) for Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada, on July 5, 2007; and WHEREAS, Section . 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved Amended SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the original Agreement; and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by April 7, 2010, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved Amended SIAs allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of the off -site and on -site improvements as required by the approved Amended SIA is extended to April 7, 2012. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on April 7, 2012. If the Subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. 0'J'57 Resolution No. 2011- Amended Tract Map No. 31733, Palizada Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 2 Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved Amended SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 1' day of February 2011, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: 1►101*5 ABSENT: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0�58 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 31733 PALIZADA AMENDS, VICINITY M NOT TO SCALE It 0 59 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering Dept. 79-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247 Attn: Timothy R. Jonassen, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer RE: Amended Tract 31732 & 31733, Palizada Project at Ave 60 & Monroe Dear Mr. Jonassen: As you may already be aware, as a result of current housing market conditions and to provide an alternative site layout geared towards an active adult lifestyle, KB Home Coastal Inc. has proposed to the City of La Quinta a re -subdivision of the two existing recorded tract maps, Amended Tract Maps 31732 and 31733, into one overall map, Tentative Tract Map 36305. The new proposed subdivision Site Development Permit Plan and Tentative Tract Map have been submitted to the City of La Quinta Planning Department for pre -application review, which comments have been received back from the Planning Department and are currently being addressed internally. We do anticipate that it could be another eight to twelve months before the complete entitlement process and associated final engineering plans are complete. It is proposed that once the new subdivision improvement agreements and related bonds can be prepared and submitted to the City, based on the Tentative Tract Map 36305, these will replace those related to the original Amended Tracts 31732 and 31733 agreements and bonds. For the above stated reasons we ask that the Subdivision Improvement Agreements for the Amended Tracts 31732 and 31733 be extended for an additional two years until April of 2012. If you have any questions or concerns please call me direct at 951-691-5235. SinmelA yours, Mike Freeman, VP Land and Forward Planning KB HOME Coastal Inc. KB HOME SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA/COASTAL INC Riverside e San Diego o Inland -Valley e Orange County o Desert 36310 Inland Valley Drive; Wildomar, CA'92595 PH (951) 691-5300 0)60 Tihf 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-1 66 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Accept Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-166, as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $34,679, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The following is a budget summary Project Budget Total $1,279,310 Amount Spent Through January 18, 2011 ($ 781,152) Remaining Anticipated Inspection Costs ($ 10,000) Remaining Project Budget Amount Available $ 488,158 Remaining Fiscal Commitment to Contractor ($ 91,440) Project Budget Amount Remaining After Construction Efforts $ 396,718 Original Construction Contract Amount $ 299,133 Contract Change Order No. 1 & 2 $ 39,647 Contract Quantity Adjustment Change Order No. 3 $ 15,310 New Contract Total $ 354,090 Amount Paid to Contractor to Date ($ 262,650) Total Remaining Fiscal Commitment to Contractor $ 91,440 Total Retention to be Released (Less Maintenance Period) ($ 34,679) Maintenance Period to Be Billed (No Retention Held) ($ 7,300) Contract Amount Remaining to be Billed by Contractor $ 49,461 Adequate funding is available to pay the contractor's remaining billing and maintenance period ($56,761) and retention ($34,679) for project closeout. 0"61 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The project was funded with Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Project Area 2 funding. As such, the project was bid with prevailing wage requirements. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Phase I project, CIP No. 2009-16A, Jefferson Street Wall and Sidewalk Improvements, included the installation of a meandering sidewalk, perimeter walls and/or fencing, and precise grading. Phase I was accepted by City Council on March 16, 2010. This acceptance allowed Phase II, CIP No. 2009-16B, Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, to begin. These improvements were constructed on the east and west sides of Jefferson Street between Westward Ho Drive and Vista Grande Street just North of Highway 1 1 1 (Attachment 1). The proposed improvements included the installation of parkway landscape, and irrigation, perimeter walls and/or fencing and precise grading within the east and west parkways on Jefferson Street between Westward Ho Drive and Vista Grande. A driveway, fencing, and additional planting were provided on the east side of Jefferson Street just north of the bridge facilitating Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) access to the Whitewater Channel east of the bridge. Landscaping was added on the south side of the bridge adjacent to the roadway to soften the appearance of the paved lot at the northeast corner of Vista Grande and Jefferson Street. On April 21, 2009 the City Council adopted Resolution 2009-033 approving the Fiscal Year 2009-2010 through 2013-2014 CIP and making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a). The Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements are included within the adopted CIP and scheduled for funding during Fiscal Years 2009-2010. On August 3, 2010, City Council awarded a contract for $299,133 to Sierra Landscape Co. to construct the Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-16B. On September 27, 2010, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a forty-five (45) working day contract completion time starting October 4, 2010, and ending on December 9, 2010. Contract change orders extended the date to December 24, 2010. The project was deemed substantially complete on December 22, 2010. As per project specifications Section 1500-3.2, no liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended. Contract Change Order Nos. 1 and 2 allowed for the installation of wrought iron fencing at the CVWD channel access area at Vista Grande and Jefferson Street and the installation of electrical conduit for future lighting along the sidewalks and 0 62 landscaping along both sides of the parkway improvements. Contract Change Order No. 3 allowed for a contract quantity adjustment between the bid quantity and the actual quantity installed. The majority of the increase was due to the installation of additional decomposed granite material on the east side of Jefferson Street where the former houses had been removed. This will help mitigate dust and provide a more aesthetically pleasing area next to the homes adjacent to the City owned property. The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Accept the Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-16B as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $34,679, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 2. Do not accept Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-16B as 100% complete; do not authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; do not authorize staff to release retention in the. amount of $34,679, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, imothy . J nas o , P.E. Public Wo s Dir or/City Engineer 0 63 Approved for submission by: Thomas . Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1 . Vicinity Map 0-64 n Legend ATTACHMENT 1 r ,1 I / / Cities I ®� LA QUINTA 1 INDIO I CITY OF INDIO White Water Storm Channel ®PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS I S VICINITY MAP CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Jefferson Street Parkway Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2009-16B APPLICANT: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer 1 • T-,dw44Q" COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the BUSINESS SESSION: Final Coachella Valley Association of Governments' CONSENT CALENDAR: 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) recently completed the 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP) Update (Attachment 1). The 2010 NMTP updates the bikeways and trails plan that was completed in 2001, and includes updated local bicycle plans for each Coachella Valley jurisdiction as well as revisions to plans for regional hiking and equestrian trails. The plan essentially consists of a compilation of multi -purpose trail plans from the various local and regional jurisdictions. For La Quinta, the CVAG plan reflects the General Plan Circulation Element Multi- purpose Trails Plan. The City of La Quinta Bicycle Plan addresses existing and proposed bikeway projects throughout the City's major arterial streets and along the Whitewater Channel corridor (page 76). The projects are prioritized and categorized as Class I, Class II, or Class III bikeways. we The bicycle plans within the CVAG NMTP will make each city and the County of Riverside eligible for Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) funds, and enhance their chances to compete for other funds. In order to qualify for BTA funds, each incorporated city and the County must adopt the plan as their own by resolution. Environmental Assessment This NMTP Update is based on the Circulation Element within the existing City of La Quinta General Plan; thus, it has been previously assessed in conjunction with the Environmental Impact Report (SCH No.: 2000091023) prepared for the City of La Quinta 2002 General Plan, which was adopted by the City Council on March 20, 2002. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would require the preparation of any subsequent environmental evaluation. Planning Commission Review The 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update was presented to the Planning Commission as a Correspondence Item on January 11, 2011. The Planning Commission briefly discussed compliance with the currently in -progress General Plan Update, funding opportunities, and timing. They showed unanimous support of the plan. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The findings necessary to approve the 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update can be made per the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Code as noted in the attached Resolution. There are no issues. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update; or 2. Do not adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 0 67 Respectfully g Director Approved for submission by: iM4&61� Thomas PrGenovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. Final Coachella Valley Association of Governments' (CVAG) Non -Motorized Transportation Plan (City Council only) f ME, RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS' 2010 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS' 2010 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update at their meeting held on the 1" of February, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, reviewed this Plan at their meeting held on the 11`h of January, 2011; and WHEREAS, in September, 2010, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments' Executive Committee adopted their 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the Plan establishes that the adoption of the 2010 Non - Motorized Transportation Plan Update is necessary to improve the public safety, improve the convenience for bicyclists in the City, and receive public funding for future bicycle roadway improvements; and WHEREAS, said Plan is based on the Circulation Element within the existing City of La Quinta General Plan and has thus been previously assessed in conjunction with the Environmental Impact Report (SCH No.: 2000091023) prepared for the City of La Quinta 2002 General Plan, which was adopted by the City Council on March 20, 2002 and no changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would require the preparation of any subsequent environmental evaluation; and WHEREAS, at said Public Meeting, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings of approval to justify a recommendation for approval of said CVAG 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update: That the proposed 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element which encourages the use of continuous and convenient 0 G9 Resolution No. 2011- CVAG 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 2 bicycle routes and multi -use trails to places of employment, recreation, shopping, schools, and other high activity areas with potential for increased non -vehicular use. 2. That the 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare in that the resulting improvements will provide alternatives to automobile transportation that meet the needs of all City residents. 3. The 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update will provide opportunities for the City of La Quinta to apply for and obtain grant monies including Bicycle Transportation Account grant monies and that Bicycle Transportation Account funds are available to those cities that adopt a regional bicycle plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of said City Council in this case; and 2. That it does approve Coachella Valley Association of Governments' 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 1st day of February, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 0 70 Resolution No. 2011- CVAG 2010 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 3 DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California V -12 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 PROCESS 2 PublicOutreach....................................................................................................................... 2 Fieldwork................................................................................................................................. 5 Meetings with Local Jurisdictions........................................................................................... 5 OtherPlanning Efforts............................................................................................................ 5 PLAN ORGANIZATION 7 CHAPTER2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES........................................................................................8 GOAL 1: BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION 8 Goal1 Objectives: .................................................................................................. * .......... 8 GOAL 2: THE PEDESTRIAN REALM 12 GoalObjectives: ................................................................................................... *,*,** ...... - 12 GOAL 3: HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 14 GoalObjectives: ............................................................................................................... - 14 CHAPTER 3 BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN.................................................................................16 BIKEWAY PLAN 20 PROGRAMS 25 SafetyEducation................................................................................................................... 25 Promotion............................................................................................................................. 25 HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS 26 CHAPTER4 LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS..........................................................................................32 BICYCLE RIDERSHIP FORECAST 33 CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER TRANSPORTATION, AIR QUALITY, ENERGY PLANS 33 Local and Regional Bikeway and Transportation Plans ........................................................ 33 Regional Air Quality and Energy Plan Consistency............................................................... 34 BICYCLE CRASH ANALYSIS 34 WHITEWATER RIVER BIKE PATH 35 CITY OF BLYTHE BICYCLE PLAN _ 37 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 37 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 37 Bicycle Parkin 39 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 39 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 40 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 40 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 40 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 40 0,413 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY BICYCLE PLAN 43 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 43 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 43 Bicycle Parkin 45 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 45 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 46 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 46 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 46 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 47 CITY OF COACHELLA BICYCLE PLAN 50 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 50 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 50 Bicycle Parkin 52 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 52 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 53 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 53 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 53 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 53 CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS BICYCLE PLAN 56 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 56 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 56 Bicycle Parkin 59 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 59 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 60 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ................................................ I............... 60 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 60 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 61 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS BICYCLE PLAN 64 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 64 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 64 Bicycle Parkin 65 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 65 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 66 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 66 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities..................................................................:.............. 66 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 66 CITY OF INDIO BICYCLE PLAN 69 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 69 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 69 Bicycle Parkin . 72 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 73 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 73 ii 0,74 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 74 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 74 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 74 CITY OF LA QUINTA BICYCLE PLAN 77 LandUse ......................................................... :..................................................................... 77 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 77 Bicycle Parkin 80 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 81 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 81 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 81 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 82 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 82 CITY OF PALM DESERT BICYCLE PLAN 85 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 85 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 85 Bicycle Parkin 88 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 88 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 89 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 89 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 90 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 90 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS BICYCLE PLAN 93 LandUse............................................................................................................................... 93 Bikeways............................................................................................................................... 93 Bicycle Parkin 97 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................... 98 BicycleAmenities.................................................................................................................. 98 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement................................................................ 99 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities................................................................................. 99 FutureFinancial Needs......................................................................................................... 99 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE BICYCLE PLAN 103 LandUse............................................................................................................................. 103 Bikeways............................................................................................................................. 103 Bicycle Parkin ............ 104 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................. 105 BicycleAmenities................................................................................................................ 105 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement.............................................................. 106 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities............................................................................... 106 FutureFinancial Needs....................................................................................................... 106 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY BICYCLE PLAN 109 LandUse............................................................................................................................. 109 Bikeways............................................................................................................................. 110 111 0,75 Bicycle Parkin 116 Links to Other Transportation Modes................................................................................. 116 BicycleAmenities................................................................................................................ 116 Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement.............................................................. 116 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities............................................................................... 117 FutureFinancial Needs....................................................................................................... 117 CHAPTER5 FUNDING SOURCES............................................................................................123 FUNDING FOR BICYCLE PROJECTS 123 FederalFunding Programs.................................................................................................. 123 StateFunding Programs..................................................................................................... 124 Local Funding ............................................ 127 TRAIL FUNDING 130 FederalFunding Programs.................................................................................................. 130 StateFunding Programs..................................................................................................... 131 CHAPTER 6 PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN............................................................. 134 FUNDING PHASES 134 COST ESTIMATES 135 FUNDING SOURCES 137 OTHER IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS 138 CHAPTER 7 DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES..........................................................139 BICYCLE FACILITIES 139 BikewayDefinitions............................................................................................................ 139 Class I Bike Path Facilities Design Recommendations........................................................ 139 Class 11 Bike Lane Facilities Design Recommendations....................................................... 141 Class 111 Bike Route Facilities Design Recommendations.................................................... 143 Signage............................................................................................................................... 145 Bicycle Parkin 147 DrainageGrates.................................................................................................................. 150 LoopDetectors.................................................................................................................... 150 HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS 151 TrailCross-Sections............................................................................................................. 151 Trailheods........................................................................................................................... 153 TrailAmenities.................................................................................................................... 154 154 Signoge............................................................................................................................... TrailCrossings..................................................................................................................... 156 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT 156 Land Use Planning 157 StreetNetworks.................................................................................................................. 157 RoadStandards................................................................................................................... 161 161 MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES APPENDICES.......................................................... ............................................... ...............163 APPENDIX A: WORKSHOP NOTES 164 APPENDIX B: ORGANIZATIONAL COMMENTS 166 LIST OF TABLES TABLE1: SURVEY RESULTS........................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE 2: BICYCLE CRASH ANALYSIS............................................................................................................ 36 TABLE 3: BICYCLE FUNDING SOURCES....................................................................................................... 135 TABLE 4: RECOMMENDED BIKEWAY SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS.................................................................. 145 TABLES: MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES......................................................................................................... 160 LIST OF MAPS NORTH COACHELLA VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATION TRAIL FACILITIES MAP....... 21 SOUTH COACHELLA VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATION TRAIL FACILITIES MAP ........ 22 SALTON SEA REGION EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATION TRAIL FACILITIES MAP ................. 23 PALO VERDE VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATION TRAIL FACILITIES MAP ................. 24 NORTH COACHELLA VALLEY HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS MAP............................................................. 28 SOUTH COACHELLA VALLEY HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS MAP.............................................................. 29 SALTON SEA REGION HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS MAP....................................................................... 30 PALO VERDE VALLEY HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS MAP....................................................................... 31 CITY OF BLYTHE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP............................................................. 41 CITYOF BLYTHE LAND USE MAP................................................................................................................. 42 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ............................................... 48 CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY LAND USE MAP................................................................................................... 49 CITY OF COACHELLA EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ...................................................... 54 CITY OF COACHELLA LAND USE MAP...........................................................................................................55 CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ....................................... 61 CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS LAND USE MAP........................................................................................... 62 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ................................................... 66 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS LAND USE MAP...................................................................................................... 67 CITY OF INDIO EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP................................................................ 74 CITYOF INDIO LAND USE MAP................................................................................................................... 75 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ....................................................... 82 CITY OF LA QUINTA LAND USE MAP........................................................................................................... 83 CITY OF PALM DESERT EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP....................................................90 CITY OF PALM DESERT LAND USE MAP....................................................................................................... 91 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ................................................. 99 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS LAND USE MAP.................................................................................................... 100 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP ............................................ 105 CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE LAND USE MAP................................................................................................ 106 o ; "l7 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY - NORTH COACHELLA VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIESMAP....................................................................................................................................... 116 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY -SOUTH COACHELLA VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIESMAP....................................................................................................................................... 117 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY - PALO VERDE VALLEY EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES MAP.......................................................................................................................................................118 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY -COACHELLA VALLEY LAND USE MAP ........................................... 119 UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE COUNTY - PALO VERDE VALLEY LAND USE MAP .......................................... 120 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: BIKE PATH BARRIER POSTTREATMENT ....................................... FIGURE 2: BIKE LANE SIGN(CALTRANS)...................................................... FIGURE 3: BIKE LANE STRIPING AND STENCIL .............................................. .........................139 FIGURE 4: BIKE LANE TREATMENT AT INTERSECTION (MUTCD, AASHTO).............................. FIGURE 5: CLASS III BIKE ROUTE SIGN.................................................................................... FIGURE 6: SHARROW STENCIL................................................................................................ FIGURE 7: NUMBERED BIKEWAY SIGN(MUTCD)................................................................... FIGURE 8: CUSTOM CVAG BIKEWAY SIGNS............................................................................ FIGURES 9 AND 10: "INVERTED-U" BICYCLE RACK.................................................................. ................. 140 .................140 ................ 141 .................. 142 FIGURE 11: MULTI -BICYCLE PARKING RACK.............................................................................................. 146 FIGURE12: BIKE RACK............................................................................................................................. 146 FIGURE13: BICYCLE LOCKERS.................................................................................................................. 147 FIGURE 14: BICYCLE PARKING SIGN(CALTRANS)...................................................................................... 147 FIGURE 15: PROPER DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN........................................................................................ 148 FIGURE 16: LA QUINTA STANDARD CROSS-SECTION................................................................................. 150 FIGURE 17: TRAILHEAD FEATURES............................................................................................................ 151 FIGURE 18: TRAILHEAD WITH FULL AMENITIES.......................................................................................... 151 FIGURES 19 AND 20: TRAIL AM ENITIES.................................................................................................... 152 FIGURE 21: TRAIL ETIQUETTE SIGN........................................................................................................... 153 FIGURE22: HIKING SIGN RS-068............................................................................................................153 FIGURE23: HIKING SIGN R-100.............................................................................................................. 153 FIGURE 24: EQUESTRIAN SIGN RS-064.................................................................................................... 153 FIGURE 25: EQUESTRIAN SIGN R-110...................................................................................................... 153 FIGURES 26 AND 27: STREET NETWORK FORMS....................................................................................... 156 FIGURE28: CONNECTED CUL-DE-SACS..................................................................................................... 157 FIGURE 29: TRAIL INTEGRATED NEIGHBORHOOD GRAPHIC........................................................................ 158 FIGURE 30: TRAIL INTEGRATED NEIGHBORHOOD RENDERING.................................................................... 158 Vl • O:IB Approved Caltrans Page(s) Bicycle Transportation Account Requirement Existing and future bicycle commuters 33 37, 43, 50, 56, 63, 68, 76, 84, 92,101, Description of existing and proposed land use patterns 107 42, 49, 55, 62, 67, 75, 83, 91,100, planning maps p Land use tannin 106, 119-120 21-24, 41, 48, 54, 61, 66, 74, 82, 90, Maps of existing and proposed bikeways 99,105,116-118 37, 43, 50, 56, 63, 68-69, 76-77, 84- Description of existing bikeways 86, 92-94, 101, 108 37-39, 44, 50-52, 57-58, 64, 69-71, 78, Description of proposed bikeways 86-87, 94-95,102, 108-113 21-24, 41, 48, 54, 61, 66, 74, 82, 90, Maps of existing and proposed bicycle parking facilities 99, 105,116-118 Description of existing and proposed bicycle parking facilities 39, 45, 52, 58, 64, 71, 79, 87, 96, 102, 114 21-24, 41, 48, 54, 61, 66, 74, 82, 90, Maps of existing and proposed multi -modal connections 99,105, 116-118 39, 45, 52, 58, 64, 71, 80, 87, 97, 103, Description of existing and proposed multi -modal connections 114 Maps of existing and proposed changing and storage facilities 41, 48, 54, 61, 66, 74, 82, 90, 99,105, 116-118 Description of existing and proposed changing and storage 40, 46, 53, 59, 64, 65, 72, 80, 88, 97, facilities 103,114 40, 46, 53, 59, 65, 72, 80, 88, 97,103, Bicycle safety education and enforcement programs 114 Citizen participation 2-5,162-170 Consistency with transportation, air quality and energy plans 33-34 37-39, 44, 50-52, 57-58, 64, 69-71, 78, Project descriptions and priority listings 86-87, 94-95, 102,108-113 40, 46-47, 53, 59-60, 65, 72-73, 81, Past expenditures and future financial needs 89, 98, 104, 115 V71 7 (� :.n. O . 1 9 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) recognizes the value of providing opportunities for local residents and visitors to bicycle for work and recreation, as well as to use off -road trails for hiking, equestrians and jogging. Such opportunities help to reduce auto trips, improve the environment, promote healthy lifestyles and create livable communities. As this Plan is implemented, it will transform Coachella and Palo Verde Valley communities into places where more people use a bicycle to get to work, to school or to the store. It will bring more recreational opportunities to its residents. In the long run, implementation will create a full network of bikeways and trails serving nearly every neighborhood. The Plan will enhance the reputation of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys as tourist meccas. Future tourists may be able to pick up a bicycle at their hotel and ride for fun, to restaurants and even to our spectacular canyons. More children will be able to ride a bicycle safely to school. Our many retirees will experience enhanced lifestyles as their hiking, equestrian and cycling options flourish. The Non -Motorized Transportation Plan updates a plan for bikeways and trails that was completed in 2001. It includes updates of a bicycle plan for each jurisdiction as well as revisions to plans for hiking and equestrian trails. The bicycle plans will make each city and the County of Riverside eligible for Bicycle Transportation Account funds, and enhance their chances to compete for other funds. Cities and the County will also improve their chances of receiving funds for the trails on this Plan. Plans for all of the facilities contained herein provide opportunities to include them along with future development. By having bikeway and trail alignments on the Plan, local jurisdictions will have significant leverage to work with developers to construct them. Since the 2001 plan was completed, constituent organizations have grown to become strong voices in the Coachella Valley. Community groups have requested that their cities and CVAG take a more assertive role in planning and constructing bikeways and trails. In response to these requests CVAG has taken the initiative to develop this Plan. This planning effort follows work completed in 2008 for CVAG and the Southern California Association of Governments that updated maps of existing facilities. The individual bicycle plans for each jurisdiction are prepared to comply with California Streets and Highways Code 891.2 that specifies what must go into a bicycle plan to be eligible for Bicycle Transportation Account funds. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Process The 2001 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan involved extensive fieldwork to measure the curb -to -curb widths of streets. Some of the local jurisdictions adopted that plan and brought in funding as a result. Some added bikeway and trail projects to their plans as well. Since this work follows a well -established progression, it was not necessary to repeat some of the former tasks. This Plan was developed from an outreach effort followed by fieldwork and meetings with local jurisdictions. This report and its maps record the findings. Public Outreach Public Workshops This planning process began with three public workshops. Those workshops were held at the locations and times below: • October 28, 2008 in Palm Desert • October 29 in Blythe • October 30 in Palm Springs The planning consultant presented a slide show describing the process. The consultant also facilitated a mapping exercise and open discussion to learn about where new bikeways, trails and related facilities are needed. Appendix A shows the results of these workshops. Meetings with Stakeholder Groups A series of stakeholder group meetings followed the public workshops. The planning consultant met with, or had other contact with, the following organizations: • Go Bike • Desert Bicycle Club • Coachella Valley Community Trails Alliance • Desert Riders • Various equestrian representatives • Desert Trails Coalition • Riverside County Park and Open Space District • Palm Springs Unified School District • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Desert Sands Unified School District • Aqua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians • Torres -Martinez Band of Mission Indians CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 2 0�1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION • Caltrans District 8 • SunLine Transit Agency • United States Bureau of Land Management • Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy • College of the Desert The stakeholder groups each provided input as to what bikeways, trails and other facilities they would like to see in this Plan. Some mentioned which of these projects they would like to see have priority. The consultant also received and recorded information from stakeholders by telephone and email. Appendix B displays the results of these stakeholder interviews. Survey In March of 2008, CVAG Transportation Ad Hoc Bicycle/Trails Sub -Committee circulated a letter to bicycle interests to ask them what their priorities are for the Coachella Valley. Results of the query were. emailed back to CVAG. Safety topped the list of overall concerns cited by respondents, particularly related to the fairness of being able to share the road with motorists. There was significant interest in a bicycling awareness and safety education campaign, especially related to existing laws regarding sharing the road. Respondents wanted bicycle events to promote the acceptance of bicycles. They also recommended that City and County staff be trained in bicycle route planning, and that General Plan Circulation Elements contain bikeways. Table 1 below displays the ranked requests according to the number of responses received. These results should be viewed as regional priorities. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update ' CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TABLE 1: SURVEY RESULTS mmiazm . bill, 1. Install signs and pavement markings: "Share the Road" 22 2. Identify Highway 111 as the major east -west route 21 3. Provide education for the public and for public officials on bicycling requirements and benefits; stage media events and 20 organized rides; promote bicycling as a visitor attraction - "Bicycle -Friendly Community" 4. Other roads should be improved with dedicated bike Lanes; i.e. Cook St., Fred Waring Dr., Indian Ave., Gene Autry Tr., Varner 19 Rd., Monterey St. (and Highway 74 south), Portola St., Bob Hope Dr., Jackson St., Frank Sinatra Dr., Miles Ave., Country Club Dr., Monroe St., Dillon Rd., Ramon Rd., and Vista Chino Dr. 5. Provide route continuity and inter -jurisdictional connectivity 19 6. The Whitewater River Channel should be improved as an off - road route; All- American Canal; Union Pacific Railroad right -of- 16 way; other mountain bike trails 7. Install bicycle detectors at signalized intersections; post 9 mounted call buttons; countdown pedestrian signals 8. Require bike paths as a standard requirement on development 7 projects; establish a "complete streets" policy 9. Trail maintenance; eliminate hazards 7 10. Enforce automobile speed limits along bicycle routes; enforce 7 bicycle safety laws 11. Adopt CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan; adopt similar language for all jurisdictions' General Plan Circulation Elements; 6 Adopt and "Urban Trails Master Plan" 12. Provide edge stripes along all roads with sufficient width 5 13. Install bicycle racks, lockers or secure storage areas; provide 4 auto parking at off -road trailheads 14. Develop a valley -wide bicycle route map both paper and web- 4 based CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 0 03$3 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Fieldwork The planning consultant conducted fieldwork to assess the feasibility of bikeway and trail alignments suggested by stakeholder groups, and to determine what is needed to create these. Appendix B presents the corridors that were assessed as a result of the public workshops and stakeholder interviews. Other fieldwork was conducted at the behest of local jurisdictions. The fieldwork primarily consisted of taking measurements and recording existing conditions. The consultant took the results of the fieldwork to each of the local jurisdictions for their reaction to these candidate projects. Meetings with Local Jurisdictions The planning consultant met with each of the cities in the Coachella Valley, Blythe and County of Riverside to determine which bikeway and trails they want in the Plan. The consultant brought the projects suggested by the public and stakeholder groups along with results of the fieldwork to help them decide. At these meetings the consultant inquired about all of the other Plan components needed to comply with California Streets and Highways Code 891.2. Additionally, local jurisdictions furnished preferences for project priorities for their individual bicycle plans. The results of the meetings with local jurisdictions determined the projects that are included in this Plan. Although this Plan has been prepared through CVAG, the Plan is intended to be adopted by each city and the County of Riverside as its own. Other Planning Efforts Simultaneously to this planning effort two other plans were created. These looked at specific areas of the Coachella Valley more in depth. The results of these planning efforts were adopted in this Plan to ensure consistency of plans. Whitewater River, Coachella Canal and Dillon Road The Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and the Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District contracted a consultant to develop a plan more detailed than this for the following three alignments in the Coachella Valley: • Whitewater River • Coachella Canal • Dillon Road CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 0"84 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION The plan detailed the alignments, bikeway and trait type and access points for these three corridors. The results are included in this Plan. Hiking and Equestrian Trail Plan for Northern Coachella Vatlev The Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy worked with local hiking and equestrian interest groups to develop a plan for earthen trails in the northern Coachella Valley and in the Coachella Valley Preserve. Some of these trails exist. Others were on former plans, but were not marked on maps very precisely. This trails plan consolidated former plans and used computer -mapping techniques to bring the alignments onto a more accurate map than had previously existed. The results are adopted into this 2009 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update. Riverside County Trails Plan for the Coachella Valley The Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District incorporated an updated Trails Plan into their 2009 County General Plan Update. The bikeways and trails in that plan are included in this Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. City of Indio 2009 Traits Feasibility Study In 2009, the City of Indio conducted a Traits Feasibility Study that planned new bikeways and traits. The bikeways and traits in that plan are included in this Non - Motorized Transportation Plan. Complete Streets Act of 2008 In 2008, the State of California adopted the Complete Streets Act of 2008. The law requires local governments to consider all users in planning for all streets. They must plan for bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users as well as motorists. And they are required to plan for at[ ages and physical abilities. Such accommodations may include sidewalks, bike lanes, crosswalks, pedestrian crossing improvements, wide shoulders, medians, bus bulbs, and audible pedestrian signals, among others. As of 2011, whenever local governments revise circulation elements to their general plans the provisions of this law take effect. By adopting the bicycle plans contained in this Plan into their circulation elements, cities and the County would comply with that part of the law. Assembly Bit[ 32 - The Global Warming Solutions Act In 2008 the State of California adopted AB 32, which requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop regulations and market mechanisms to reduce California's greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020, and by 80 percent by 2050 below 1990 [evels.By adopting and implementing the bicycle plans contained in this Plan into their circulation elements, cities and the County would progress towards these objectives. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 6 0185 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Senate Bill 375 In 2008 the State of California adopted SB 375 aimed at reducing greenhouse gases caused by motor vehicles. It calls on regional governments to, develop plans to reduce sprawl and develop bicycle, pedestrian and transit transportation modes. SB 375 offers cities and developers incentives to develop in a more compact form. By adopting and implementing the bicycle plans contained in this Plan into their circulation elements, cities and the County would progress towards the intent of this law. Cities and the County can also progress towards the intent of this law by adopting "smart growth" strategies in their land use planning to mold new development into a form that makes new neighborhoods walkable and bicycle friendly. Greenhouse Gas Pledge of 2009 At the 2009 international climate change summit in Copenhagen, President Obama pledged that the US would adopt policies to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050 below 1990 levels. Since a large portion of greenhouse gas emissions in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys are caused by motor vehicles, it will be important to convert a significant portion of the daily trips made here to bicycle and pedestrian trips in order to meet our objectives. This Plan can be used as an important step in this direction. Caltrans Traffic Operations PolicV Directive 09-06 Caltrans Traffic Operations Policy Directive 09-06 modifies the California Manual on Traffic Control Devices and provides specific guidance to user -activated traffic signals to detect bicycles and motorcycles. It specifies to the jurisdiction of that intersection, that upon modifying or replacing 50 percent or more of the limit line detectors at an intersection, that at[ travel lanes must be modified to detect bicycles and motorcycles. Plan Organization Chapter 2 reiterates the Goals and Objectives from the 2001 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan that this Plan updates. Chapter 3 presents the entire bikeway and trails plan in both the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. Chapter 4 contains all of the individual bicycle master plans for each jurisdiction along with project priorities and phasing. Chapter 5 describes eligible funding sources. Chapter 6 lays out an implementation strategy. Chapter 7 includes design issues. The Appendix displays results of the public outreach effort and meetings with local jurisdictions on a list of Plan revisions. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 7 0)86 CHAPTER 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES These goals and objectives are taken from the 2001 Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. Since the emphasis of that plan was somewhat different (it contained a pedestrian component, for example) these reflect that. Goals provide the context for the specific objectives and policy guidelines discussed in the Non -motorized Transportation Plan. The goals provide the long-term vision and serve as the foundation of the plan. Goals are broad statements of purpose that do not provide specific action statements, while policy guidelines provide a bridge between general policies and actual implementation guidelines, which are provided in the following sections. As with the Plan recommendations, none of the Goals or Objectives is funded at this time. This Transportation Plan and the goals, objectives, and policy guidelines herein do not mandate any specific action by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments or local jurisdictions. These goals and objectives are meant as guidelines and are not required actions by the jurisdictions. Goal 1: Bicycle Transportation Provide a friendly environment for bicycling in the Coachella Valley and make bicycling an integral part of the transportation network by implementing and maintaining a connected bikeway network, providing for ancillary facilities, and encouraging bicycling as a convenient and safe mode of transportation for all residents and visitors and for those of all skill levels. The following objectives address this goal in detail. More detailed plans for implementation of this goal are contained in the following sections. Goal 1 Objectives: Objective A Implement the Bicycle Transportation Plan, which identifies existing and future needs, and provides specific recommendations for facilities and programs over the next 20 years. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update _r 0''87 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Objective A Policy Guidelines 1. Encourage local agencies to assign a part time bicycle coordinator who could help implement their plans, act as a liaison to the public, and pursue funding for bicycle facilities projects. 2. Ensure compatibility of bicycle planning efforts among local agencies. 3. Encourage local agencies to update their plans periodically as required by Caltrans to reflect new policies and/or requirements for non -motorized transportation funding. 4. Encourage local agencies to coordinate among all municipalities, schools, and community organizations to review and comment on bicycle issues. 5. Encourage local agencies to regularly monitor bicycle -related accident levels, and seek a per -bicycle -mile reduction over the next 20 years. 6. Work with local advocacy organizations and other stakeholders in the process of formulating bicycle master plans for cities in the CVAG region. 7. Encourage public involvement in the planning and implementation process by utilizing workshops, surveys, and other means. Objective B Complete a network of bikeways that is feasible, fundable, and that serve bicyclists' needs, especially for travel to employment centers, schools, commercial districts, transit stations and recreational destinations. Objective B Policy Guidelines 1. Seek funding for bikeway projects through current regional, state, and federal funding programs. Encourage multi -jurisdictional funding applications. 2. Develop and fund destination -based signing system for the bikeway network. 3. Coordinate with local jurisdictions and developers in the Coachella Valley to ensure that appropriate opportunities for bicycle connections are planned, constructed, and maintained. 4. Recognize and accommodate other key activities on shared -use paths, such as pedestrian, equestrian and golf cart uses. 5. Develop a long distance cycling corridor as an alternate to SR-111 to provide for Valley -wide connectivity and for long distance commuting and recreational opportunities for bicyclists of varying skill levels. Such possibilities include the Whitewater River and the Interstate 10 corridor. 6. Provide connections to regional trails and paths that serve adjacent areas, such as Desert Center and Blythe, the Salton Sea Basin, the Yucca Valley area, and the San Gorgonio Pass area. 7. Develop a regional map showing all bikeways in the Coachella Valley and identify major activity centers on it that are accessible via the bikeway network. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 1 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 8. Encourage local agencies to adopt standards for construction of new roadways that incorporate bikeways. Objective C Maintain and improve the quality, operation, and integrity of the bikeway network and facilities. Objective C Policy Guidelines: 1. Encourage local agencies to undertake routine maintenance of the bikeway network and facilities, such as sweeping bicycle lanes and routine surface repair, as funding and priorities allow. 2. Encourage local agencies to ensure that repair and construction of transportation facilities minimize disruption to the cycling environment to the extent practical. 3. Encourage local agencies to ensure that new bicycle improvements do not negatively impact the environment. 4. Provide designs that ensure the safety of bicyclists and others who use shared -use trails. 5. Encourage local agencies to follow Caltrans design standards as minimum standards for bikeways. 6. Encourage local agencies to eliminate hazards such as unsafe drainage grates, poor drainage, dangerous railroad track crossings, etc. 7. Encourage local agencies to establish or incorporate advisory committees that meet regularly and address bicycle issues. Objective D Provide short- and long-term bicycle parking in employment and commercial areas, in multifamily housing, at schools, and at recreation and transit facilities. Objective D Policy Guidelines: 1. Encourage local agencies to consider adopting zoning code ordinances, or other developer requirements, for safe, secure bicycle parking facilities as part of new development projects. 2. Fund and encourage local agencies to install of short- and long-term bicycle parking in the public right-of-way. 3. Encourage local agencies to work with area elementary, middle, and high schools to promote bicycle commuting and to assist in purchasing and siting long- and short-term bicycle parking. 4. Encourage local agencies to consider adopting zoning or developer requirements for clothing lockers and showers in new buildings. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 10 0 189 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 5. Encourage local agencies to require bicycle parking at major events to help mitigate traffic and parking impacts. 6. Fund long- and short-term parking facilities at intermodal centers, such as the two Amtrak stations and at major transit stops. Objective E Increase the number of bicycle -transit trips. Objective E Policy Guidelines: 1. Support and promote bicycle use on the Sunline Transit system in the Coachella Valley. 2. Assist transit providers in maintaining existing bicycle racks and providing lockers in the transit system to encourage bicycle use. 3. Encourage local agencies to consider bike rental opportunities in downtown areas, at key recreation destinations, and other locations where visitors are entering the Coachella Valley. 4. Encourage Sunline Transit to monitor bicycle utilization on transit buses to ensure that adequate capacity is available for users. Obiective F Develop and implement education and encouragement plans aimed at youth, adult cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. Increase public awareness of the benefits of bicycling and of available resources and facilities. Objective F Policy Guidelines 1. Encourage local agencies to develop adult and youth bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement and safety programs. These could be provided at schools, senior centers, and recreational areas. 2. Encourage local agencies to market the health benefits of bicycling. 3. Encourage local agencies to market the natural landscape and climate as incentives to travel by bicycle, especially for visitors and recreational riders. 4. Encourage local agencies to educate motorists as to the rights of bicyclists. 5. Encourage Sunline Transit to educate its bus drivers on how to interact with bicyclists. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 11 0 )90 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Objective G Develop and implement a safety program with the development of shared -use trails. Objective G Policy Guidelines 1. Coordinate with local law enforcement to create a plan to regularly patrol shared - use trails. 2. Fund a call -box system along trails and paths to provide security and a quick response to incidents by appropriate public agencies and services. 3. Encourage local agencies to collaborate with law enforcement on appropriate designs that enhance the safety of trails as they are developed. Goal 2: The Pedestrian Realm Provide a safe, convenient, and friendly environment for pedestrian movement in the Coachella Valley that includes all users of the pedestrian environment, such as seniors, children, persons with disabilities, tourists and others. The following objectives address these goals and provide guidelines for local jurisdictions to follow. More detailed plans for implementation of these goals and objectives are contained in following sections. Goal 2 Objectives: Objective A Implement the Pedestrian Element of the Non -Motorized Transportation Plan, which identifies existing and future needs, and provides recommendations for facilities over the next 20 years. Objective A Policy Guidelines 1. Encourage public involvement in the planning and implementation process by utilizing workshops, surveys, and other means. 2. Adopt guidelines and requirements that encourage developers to plan for pedestrian -friendly designs in new developments and other future needs of the city. 3. Seek funding for projects identified in the Plan. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 12 0'O1 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Objective B Implement pedestrian designs that encourage walking and contribute to a positive walking environment for all people. Objective B Policy Guidelines: 1. All pedestrian facilities and designs should be accessible to everyone and should meet the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2. Sidewalks should be provided in residential and commercial areas wide enough to provide adequate room for comfortable pedestrian movement. 3. Pedestrian activity should be planned and accommodated in denser commercial districts. This will foster a more walkable environment for pedestrians. 4. Commercial office buildings should provide for ground floor retail to attract pedestrian activity. 5. The main entrances to buildings and retail establishments should be pedestrian oriented and located on the street, and parking should be encouraged to be located in the back of or underneath buildings. 6. Architectural design standards should be adopted for commercial, retail, and multi -family residential developments, as well as for commercial signage. Design review boards could also be created to guide these new standards. 7. Design standards should be used as a guide for attractive landscaping and streetscape amenities. These standards should be aesthetically pleasing, consistent, and compatible with surrounding designs and uses. 8. Pedestrian amenities, such as street lighting, bus shelters, street furniture, and refuse receptacles, should be added in retail districts where they are absent. 9. Encourage farmers' markets, arts and crafts, and other events in public spaces. Obiective C Ensure and enhance the safety of pedestrians at intersections and other specific locations. Objective C Policy Guidelines: 1. Intersection designs should include crosswalks, signals where warranted, adequate lighting, and other features that enhance the safety of pedestrians. 2. The number of driveways should be reduced in areas of the city where there is a high level of pedestrian activity, such as in a downtown business district. 3. Street lighting should be considered on new streets. 4. Raised medians should be considered when planning for pedestrian street crossings, especially the crossing of a wide arterial street. This would provide a refuge for pedestrians attempting to cross the street. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 13 0:92 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 5. Consideration should be given to "bulb -out" curbs at intersections to decrease the distance pedestrians need to travel across an intersection. Goal 3: Hiking and Equestrian Recreational Opportunities Provide a safe, accessible, and enjoyable environment for hiking and equestrian recreational opportunities on off -road trails in the Coachella Valley. The following objectives address these goals and provide guidelines for local jurisdictions to follow. More detailed plans for implementation of these goals and objectives are contained in the following sections. Goal 3 Objectives: Objective A Implement the Hiking and Equestrian Element of the Non -Motorized Transportation Plan, which identifies existing and future needs, and provides specific recommendations for facilities and programs over the next 20 years. Objective A Policy Guidelines: Seek funding for projects identified in the Plan. Work through the detailed design and implementation phases of project development. Objective B Implement a Trail Plan that accommodates users of off -road trails and creates an integrated network that enhances trail access and recreational opportunities. Objective B Policy Guidelines: 1. All existing and proposed trails should reflect the needs of existing hiking, bicycling, and equestrian groups, the requirements of governing agencies, and design and planning standards developed by national groups such as the American Hiking Society and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2. Trajlheads should be developed to provide access to the trail network and minimize adverse impacts on surrounding residents and wildlife in the vicinity. 3. Trailheads should include vehicular and bicycle parking as well as restrooms and drinking fountains. Selected trailheads should offer developed staging areas for equestrians and parking for trucks/trailers. 4. Trails should be developed with a minimum of barriers per ADA requirements. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 14 0`93 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 5. A distinct system of trail identification and signage should be developed to identify routes, reveal relative level of intensity, regulated activities, and hours of operation. 6. Existing gaps in the trail network should be closed in order to create a more integrated system of trails that creates more opportunities for recreation. 7. Existing easements should be utilized to fill in gaps in the trail network as much as possible to take advantage of the relative low cost of construction at these locations. 8. Ensure the safety and security of all users of off -road trails in the Coachella Valley. 9. Trails should be designed to protect Big Horn Sheep and other natural resources and wildlife. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 15 0)94 CHAPTER 3 BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Cities in the Coachella Valley have constructed a variety of bikeway and trail types. Until a mapping effort was conducted for the County of Riverside Department of Public Health in 2007 there had never been an attempt to create a set of common definitions for each of these. The updated Department of Public Health map displays existing bikeways in the Coachella Valley for users. In 2008, CVAG and the Southern California Association of Governments contracted out to create a map and to put the map into a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) format that can be modified over time as projects are built and plans are changed. A classification system was devisedas part of these two mapping efforts. The definitions of each classification type are shown below. These are the bikeway and trail class types that show up on the maps in this Plan. Class I Bikeways - Typically called bike paths, they provide for bicycle travel on paved rights -of -way completely separated from any street or highway. These are particularly popular with novice cyclists. .It'3tl f^ NO MOTOR VEHICLES OR MOTORIZED BICYCLES CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 16 V95 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Class II Bikeways - These are often referred to as bike lanes. They provide a striped, stenciled and signed lane for one-way travel on a street or highway. MINIM 1!0�1 Now"S. Class III Bikeways - Generally referred to as bike routes, they provide for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic and are identified by signing, and sometimes stencils. ail � RfJllT Paved Multipurpose Paths - Similar to Class I bike paths, but intended for multiple users (bicycles, pedestrians, roller bladers, other non -motorized users) and do not meet Caltrans bike path standards. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 17 0')'a6 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Sidewalk Paths - Wide sidewalks that can be used by joggers, pedestrians, bicyclists and other non -motorized users. Hiking/Equestrian Trails - Off -road earthen paths intended primarily for equestrians. Hikers, pedestrians, mountain bicyclists and others are permitted, unless signed otherwise. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 18 0)97 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Golf Cart Paths - Paved off-street paths that permit use by golf carts, bicycles and pedestrians. Golf Cart Lanes- Striped lanes that permit use by golf carts, bicycles and equestrians. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 19 am CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Bikeway Plan The planning effort described in Chapter 1 yielded a comprehensive network of bikeways of all types in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The following maps display that network by bikeway type. They also depict bikeways that exist, and those that are planned. Since some of the cities in the Coachella Valley plan their bikeway networks with paved multi -purpose paths, sidewalk paths, golf cart lanes and golf cart paths that link with Caltrans standard bikeways, these are shown on the following maps. They are not shown on the individual bikeway plans for each local jurisdiction since these must use the Caltrans standard bikeway types to comply with Streets and Highways Code 891.2. The following maps illustrate the planned bikeways in a regional format. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 20 J W (n 0 J J CLQcn W Q LLJ [L U W w L z a Q � J U +� ZQ4 O NJ � U X W U Z aft -, All - Y� 514 %OA4Y�tYJG1 ,K MCA:• tta� �, 3avw itivvr lRti �gti M a fdt" t.sv� IJ O 1 10100 u a u EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATIONAL t TRAIL FACILITIES # i z•••N nf`ey�. SOUTH C OACHELLA VALLEY t oa.�. T'S. 2 S � w gg� P Y z #6N9tF G( -wxm Nkt Y K RAk#40 RAG} r, a t [ z1 1 7, xi - r. PALt DT 11 T i'�� ip j ' HI II^ FlILRIf1�CW 4 I � . +S t eh%4{I iYir�tiiE `+U`rD F1ARy ,Mil �d " p# ty n.I IA'j1]g01x'i'jh@rtlk % ?42NRIzx tl .�+1 A .t6L)r(> f � E4Gw F5x1FWAL�Rj MAN t Et10E- 1'l^r/f7W1 a 9+t6UlAI^WEI.IxB tAW � k�l d ' N N d � Logond YmAF sYMa �ixa ar.Lwt ! Xt EVit� 1 wi .1 � I E 1 u bu F t •1 __.... I..JL 3yi2M �.y1.Y.. n sr+C 1 ' ar uen^an . fyypyr vra,e.cp.n R x.. j. f x x P9 0101 U EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATIONAL TRAIL FACILITIES SALTON SEA REGION WYpf R6 a' +'f+t y 1�. 1 f AL# f r 1 i 4a„R.e91 w i F� f 9cti` xY s�#raY_. _ t , l j! 1 ZZ,�. f 'i 1 � a'2YtUi�.+2 f a M t..n`7 „) t f ?ari,n� aFAVi— v�� ♦F i �E 1 0 ' coMVN rw. y i i P',Rj 4" u E r# �` i i i Legend Tra�HnilMs '�+w hrt'Poa rose C4A6S YMYUB - - Cau pyy P[qH •m r6M'k Aia[+M+i ••..v iY_tt+.i»in ®�tab:4l�Aw�^.tMn4!A?M .•••••. OSwza,#M.�i•�ry - - vi�yxf..ian..nwao .. f-wV+:ty: nrenu .-..:v L1Mt�i aq.'a: (mw.. f•WR1 mp. lM kWnr .v a ma��DF:fr Re>.3}+i�r! +n wahN#W.t.WTYm%rtey M N N 01-02 EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE AND RECREATIONAL TRAIL FACILITIES PALO VERDE VALLEY SAE 1 i y� pr r '_✓ wY r_+N ... �..e.✓eOCIi WJ vSk .� � u` M ••• p E P ii acrx a:'e R. . QFN!.Y4kN iRt. 1 1 1 5(AYE N A A1d• l Legend v: [%w4.Ga6 CxWT! nAa. .aw.!^wHl o- m nr w'K7t PaM1 MvuJ -. .•6Y. Wa.+�P'a� � nPSXM 4✓w. LY++a v .r. phM.YrfKHIPt w w�tgrt'2a lan..h .. ...s�pq.iahAywa ..-.. !4at:tRX ."x.Y. <Miwq a�UapCup GaP.'aaY N Q0103 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN Programs Safety Education A bicycle safety education program will be encouraged as part of this Plan and would teach bicycle safety to children, adults, and other groups that encounter bicyclists. A specific curriculum geared for each audience, along with a handbook or other literature, is recommended. • Children. All children in public schools should go through a bicycle safety program before they graduate. This should start at a young age. In addition, bicycle safety should be taught to students who are taking drivers education classes at school. This should be part of the Safe Routes to School programs. Adults. A bicycle safety education component should also be available to adults at employment sites, and on selected weekends for the general public curriculum should educate both bicyclists and motorists. . The safety • Other Groups. Safety education should be taught to others who come in to contact with bicyclists such as motorists, bus drivers and local police. • City and County Staff. Bicycle safety education can be incorporated into existing training and orientations of local jurisdictional staff that work with transportation and planning. It should also include local police departments. Promotion A customized Bicycle Safety, Marketing, and Education Handbook could be developed thatidentifies existing local and regional efforts and presents a standardized approach that can be used by Coachella and Palo Verde Valley communities. Typical marketing strategies include: • Bike Fairs and Races. Events to promote Coachella and Palo Verde Valley bicycle facilities, including fairs and races, can be organized to get people excited about riding and familiarize them with the facilities. Employer Incentives. Local jurisdictions may work with major employers to encourage bicycle commuting by their employees by coordinating promotional CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 25 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN events, and encouraging the provision of bicycle lockers and access to shower facilities. Employers may to choose to give regular commuters new bicycles as an incentive to ride. Bike -to -Work Week could be advertised and promoted as a week where employees are encouraged to bike to work. Some people may start bicycling to work regularly after participating in this annual event. Hiking and Equestrian Trails Our planning effort also produced a comprehensive network of hiking and equestrian trails in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The following maps display that network by those that exist, and those that are planned. Some of the trails are only for hiking or walking, while others are primarily for equestrians. Some of them also allow use by mountain bicycles. Every trail has its own guidelines. Since no one to date has catalogued the permitted uses of each trail, they are shown together. Moreover, some of these trails are narrow, single-track earthen trails, while others are wide and have undergone significant construction to make them flat, smooth and ideal for use. They have fencing, signing and even equestrian parking in some places. Some of these have been improved with surfaces such as decomposed granite. Some of the trails are used, but have not been much improved. Some traverse private land, and others run over public land. Again, since no one has kept track of the different types of hiking and equestrian trails, they are shown together. The maps represent progressively more accurate trail alignments than shown on previous maps because a variety of efforts have been undertaken to show them as precisely as possible. Those in the northern Coachella Valley are now quite accurate as a result of the use of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology by the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. Other proposed trails don't have precise alignments yet because they haven't been planned to that level. Future planning efforts will select exact trail alignments for these. The 2008 CVAG/SLAG mapping effort used aerial photographyto map existing trails. The GIS work performed for this Plan utilized topographical maps to place proposed trails in logical places. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 26 0105 CHAPTER 3: BIKEWAY AND TRAILS PLAN The trails and trailheads shown on the map as proposed in the northern Coachella Valley are conceptual. They are not approved projects. Each of these that move forward will be subject to applicable review and permitting processes including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Projects on lands owned by entities, which are signatories to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP) will be subject to the criteria, and review and approval process stipulated by the CV MSHCP. Thiswill include review by the relevant Resource Management Unit Committee (RMUC) and approval by the Resource Management Oversight Committee (RMOC). Proposed trails on Bureau of Land Management lands will be subject to a separate process. The following maps illustrate existing and proposed hiking and equestrian trails along with trailheads. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 27 0106 N 0107 a P N O `s C O Z 0108 O Nf C O Z u OIP9 EXISTING AND PROPOSED HIKING AND EQUESTRIAN TRAIL FACILITIES PALO VERDE VALLEY � xYHk+F 3Dt N/prE ' � gxµr3wvl Wt �+_„ c N y Legend q BaY Fud". O. UAWTL n% O �— �... • p{pq tPlrmwd.Grv.q .. fWtlf:Y+��T.ikFMw. +M1�M � mtm O uxewr n ... Co N f 9 L N C 0 0 f c 0 .. a 6 CHAPTER 4 LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS This section of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Non -Motorized Transportation Plan contains the individual cities' bicycle plans and Riverside County's bicycle plan for the unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The elements of the plans fulfill the requirements of the California State Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) Design Guidelines Manual Section 891.2. The requirements for bicycle plans include the following: a) Estimated number of existing bike commuters and estimated increase b) Map and description of existing and proposed land use c) Map and description of existing and proposed bikeways d) Map and description of existing and proposed bicycle parking e) Map and description of existing and proposed links to other transportation modes f) Map and description of existing and proposed facilities for changing and storing clothes (amenities) g) Description of safety education programs, efforts by law enforcement and effect on crash rates h) Description of public input i) Description of coordination with other local and regional transportation, air quality and energy conservation plans j) Description of projects and their priorities k) Description of past expenditures and future financial needs Compliance with the 891.2 requirements makes jurisdictions eligible to apply for Bicycle Transportation Account funding. Every year $7.2-million is available. Once a bicycle plan has been approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission, a jurisdiction is eligible to compete with others for funding of specific projects. Those projects identified in each of the plans are eligible for funding, and those given a top priority designation are more likely to receive funds. Each project will be submitted independently by each jurisdiction and will compete against others from around the State for funds. Although each plan is presented individually, the bicycle ridership forecast and bicycle collision data analysis sections of the plans can be found at the end of this introductory section. These two analyses are handled with all the citiesand the unincorporated county areas together in the following two chapter sections. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 32 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Each plan contains all the bikeway projects along with their priority, length and planning level cost estimates. As noted in Chapter Five these cost estimates use average costs per mile. More detailed cost estimates of each project will need to be conducted later on taking into account the particulars of each. The bicycle plans also set a blueprint for jurisdictions to implement policies and actions that can make their bicycling environment friendlier. Bicycling is recognized as a growing mode of transportation in most cities across the nation, and especially in California. Whether for recreational or utilitarian trips, bicycling is becoming more popular. The topography of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys makes for a relatively easy environment for bicycling. Most destinations are accessible over relatively flat terrain. More challenging routes are also available for the more experienced recreational cyclist. The region's climate is very conducive to bicycling in the mild winter months, and during the hot summer months, many bicyclists ride at night when temperatures are more moderate. Bicyclists in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys could benefit from a more bicycle -friendly physical environment to make cycling in the valleys a more enjoyable and efficient mode of transportation for years to come. Bicycle Ridership Forecast This Plan setsan objective to reach 5 percent of all trips to be made by bicycle regionwide. This is the objective for each of the local jurisdictions as well. Although it is recognized that it is an ambitious goal, it is achievable with complete implementation of the Plan. According to the most recent US Census data available (2000) the percentage of bicycle commuters for each jurisdiction follows: Blythe: 0.8% Cathedral City: 0.6% Coachella: 0.0% Indian Wells: 0.0% Indio: 0.5% La Quinta: 0.2% Palm Desert: 0.5% Palm Springs: 1.1% Rancho Mirage: 0.1% Riverside County (includes county): 0.5% Consistency with Other Transportation, Air Quality, Energy Plans Local and Regional Bikeway and Transportation Plans all Since this Plan contains a regional bicycle plan, as well as local bicycle plans for every jurisdiction, by process local and regional efforts are coordinated. Each of the local jurisdictions provided input to this Plan and their comments were incorporated. This CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 33 -10. 0112 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Plan provides local jurisdictions the option to incorporate their bicycle plan into their Circulation Element of their General Plans. This Plan supports regional transportation goals, including those of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) and the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) put forth by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Regional Air Quality and Energy Plan Consistency The Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) delegates its transportation planning to SCAG through its RTP document, which identifies goals and objectives that promote bicycling to reduce air emissions. An emphasis on utilitarian bicycling, including supporting amenities and infrastructure, is an important aspect of meeting these goals. Since this Plan contains bikeways, bicycle parking, links to transit and amenities, it encourages utilitarian cycling and is consistent with the SCAQMD efforts. By encouraging utilitarian bicycling, the Plan will also reduce energy consumption. Since transportation consumes the largest portion of our energy and many trips are within bicycling distance, the potential to reduce energy consumption is great. Bicycle Crash Analysis Table 2following shows the number and rate of crashes (collisions in SWITRS terminology) involving bicyclists in each city and the unincorporated areas in the CVAG region for the three most current years 2006, 2007, and 2008. This information was gathered from the California Highway Patrol's SWITRS website, which provides crash information by jurisdiction. Population data was obtained from the California Department of Finance and from the CVAG website. As the table shows, only one jurisdiction in the CVAG region had a higher bicycle crash rates than the state average -- Palm Springs. Further research would be needed to determine the reasons for this. However, cities that have more cyclists generally have greater numbers of crashes. Further, Palm Springs likely has many tourists cycling that may not be familiar with the local environment.No other discernable patterns emerge from this data. Only Blythe, Indio and Rancho Mirage have bicycle safety education programs. The police in all of the local jurisdictions enforce all traffic laws, including those that impact bicycles. Since no clear crash pattern surfaced from the data, no conclusions can be drawn as to whether bicycle safety education programsor police enforcement has had any effect on the number of bicyclists involved in crashes. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 34 0113 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Whitewater River Bike Path The Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and Riverside County Park and Open Space District plans for the Whitewater River included a concept for a bike path the entire length of the river in the Coachella Valley, with the exceptions of several stretches in Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert and Indian Wells. They concluded that while challenges exist, particularly where private entities own the land along the river, that it may be feasible to put a bike path along the river through some cooperative planning efforts or developer agreements. However, the cities of Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert and Indian Wells prefer to leave such a bike path off their local bicycle plans in these areas so they are not shown there. This reference leaves open future opportunities for landowners to negotiate with cities regarding the bike path. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 35 N Z Q J a W J V } V fa J Q V O J W IL IL x u O O O O O O O O O p 10 O O O O O O O O O O O p n O � N P M c0 O N n P V N M N r�+f N J T Y i6 O O N O O O O O O O O N N w M T Y i0 O O O O O O O O O N R w T i0 O O O O O O O O O N Y R w N w o �_ U C �6 O N i0 v�i ::E O U! 0 N �.., O Q Y t u v m o d E E c n F- �. m u u o a a z » a ea N r a D c m a c O .+ L O O. N R L N N O O c O Z V 0115 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Blythe Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 21,329 (California Department of Finance), Blythe is a small residential city located in the Palo Verde Valley adjacent to the Colorado River. The City is located among a grid network of arterial streets that connects to the surrounding agricultural unincorporated areas. Some of the main arterial streets within the City include Chanslor Way, Hobsonway, 61h, 10th and 141h Avenues, De Frain, Lovekin, and Intake Boulevards, Broadway, and Main and 7th Streets. Most of Blythe's destinations are located in the downtown area along Hobsonway, Main Street, and Broadway. Land Use The map on page 42 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Blythe. The City consists primarily of low to medium -density residential and agricultural land uses. Commercial uses are located primarily along Hobsonway. Future low -density residential is planned for the undeveloped northeastern portion of the City. Agricultural uses are planned for the future in many areas in the east and northwestern portions of Blythe. Bikeways Existing The City of Blythe currently has no existing bikeways. Proposed Blythe has proposed 29 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 41 0116 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Blythe Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From o Length (mi.) Estimated Cos 1 Colorado River Northern city limit Southern city limit 8.7 $8,700,0 II Hobson Way estern city limit Eastern city limit 9.3 $465,00 II th Ave. De Frain Blvd. Eastern city limit 0.5 $25,00 II Chanslor Way Ehlers Blvd. to Main St. El Dorado St. to Olive Lake Blvd 1.4 $70,00 III Chanslor Way ain St. El Dorado St. 1.1 $22,00 I De Frain Blvd. th Ave. estern city limit between 8th Ave. and 10th Ave. 2.8 $2,800,OOC II Lovekin Blvd. 8th Ave. Southern city limit 3.3 $165,00 II 6th Ave. estern city limit Eastern city limit 2.5 $125,00 It ells Rd. De Frain Blvd. th Ave. 1.3 $65,00 Public bicycle parking program $25,00 City of Blythe 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos III 14th Ave. Western city limit 7th St. 1.1 $22,00 II 14th Ave. 7th St. Intake Blvd. 1.0 $50,000 II Intake Blvd. 10th Ave. Seeley Ave. 3.0 $150,00 II Broadway 10th Ave. Southern city limit 2.1 $105,00 II 7th St., C&D Blvd. 110th Ave. 1-10 Freeway 1.7 $85,00 II Barnard St. AZ&CA Railroad 2nd St. 0.4 $20,00 Corridor III Barnard St. Lovekin Blvd to AZ&CA 2nd St. to Tesoro Ln. 1.1 $22,00 Railroad Corridor 8th Ave. at AZ Et CA .25 miles north of Chanslor 2.1 $2,100,000 I C Canal Path Railroad Corridor Way I Quail Run Palo Verde Community Wells Rd. 1.4 $1,400,0 College CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 30 0117 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Blythe 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos I AZB:CA Railroad Corridor Northern city limit Southern city limit 3.2 $3,200,0 II Main St. Chanslor Way 14[h Ave. 1.0 $50,00 II 2nd St. Chanslor Way Hobson Way 0.5 $25,00 11 8th Ave. Western city limit Eastern city limit - 1.8 $90,000 11 Olive Lake Blvd. 10th Ave. Hobson Way 1.5 $75,00 III 7th St. I-10 Freeway Southern city limit 0.5 $10,00 11 10th Ave. Western city limit Olive Lake Blvd. 4.2 $210,00 I 7th St. 10th Ave. Hobson Way 1.5 $1,500,00 11 Arrowhead Blvd. Riverside Ave. Southern city limit 0.8 $40,00 11 Hwy 78/11eighbours Blvd. Northern city limit Southern city limit 1.2 $60,00 11 Riverside Ave. Neighbours Blvd. to Arrowhead Blvd. Intake Blvd. to Olive Lake Blvd. 2.0 $100,00 The map on page 41 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existin Blythe has no existing bicycle parking facilities that have been identified. Proposed The City of Blythe has no requirements for bicycle parking in new buildings.The City will apply to fund a public bicycle parking program at retail and civic locations as well as at all schools. Part of this program will include shelters to shade bicycles from the sun. Links to Other Transportation Modes All Palo Verde Valley Transit buses have bike racks. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 39 1 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Amenities Although Blythe has no existing shower and clothing locker facilities identified, the City may pursue these facilities in the future, but none are planned now. The City of Blythe has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The Blythe Police Department has been providing bicycle safety education to K-8 students at the schools. Every year every student attends either an assembly or a class where this education is provided. Occasionally, the Police Department holds bicycle rodeos to give children practice on their bicycles outside. In the rodeo setting parents also learn about bicycle safety. The Police Department also gives free bicycle helmets to any child that needs one. In addition, Blythe has won a federal Safe Routes to School grant, part of which will be used to enhance the bicycle safety curriculum starting in 2010. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities The City of Blythe has not identified any past expenditure for bicycle facilities in the past five years. Future Financial Needs The City of Blythe has the following future financial needs: Top Priority Bikeways: 30.9 miles, $12,437,000 2nd Priority Bikeways: 13.9 miles, $3,954,000 3'd Priority Bikeways: 18.2 miles, $5,360,000 Total: 63 miles, $21,751,000 Public Bicycle Parking: $25,000 Total Capital Financial Need: $21,776,000 Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 19.7 miles, $62,410 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 4V 011.9 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 41 OL�o CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS W U) D CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 42 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Cathedral City Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 52,447(California Department of Finance), Cathedral City is a residential city that has undergone much residential development over the past 20 years. The City has a network of arterial streets that connects to its two neighboring cities, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Some of the arterial streets include Date Palm and Cathedral Canyon Drives, Vista Chino and Ramon Roads, and Dinah Shore and East Palm Canyon Drives. Most of Cathedral City's destinations are located along the arterial street network. Land Use The map on page 49 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Cathedral City. The City consists primarily of medium- and low -density residential with some existing retail and office uses located along East Palm Canyon Drive, Ramon Road, and Date Palm Drive. Some industrial uses are located along Perez Road. Future residential, industrial and commercial development is planned near the 1-10 freeway, and both commercial and residential development is planned for areas in the northern part of the City. Bikeways Existin Cathedral City currently has one Class I and six Class II bikeways. The following table provides their location and length. They total 10 miles in length. City of Cathedral City Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage Whitewater Wash (south bank) Cathedral Canyon Dr. East of Date Palm Dr. 0.7 II Vista Chino Rd. Ventura Dr. Date Palm Dr. 2.0 II 30th Ave. Landau Blvd. Santoro Dr. 1.5 II Palm Dr. Varner Rd. .25 miles north of the 1-10 Freeway 0.6 II Landau Blvd. Vista Chino Rd. Ramon Rd. 2.3 II Cathedral Canyon Dr. Ramon Rd. Highway 111 2.4 11 Victoria Dr. Date Palm Dr. Plumley Rd. 0.5 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 43 0122 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Proposed Cathedral City has proposed 16 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Cathedral City Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost Palm Springs city limit I Whitewater River to Ramon Rd.; Date Palm Dr. to Rancho 2.8 $2,800,000 Landau Blvd. to Miragecity limit Cathedral Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon II Dr. Western city limit Cathedral Canyon Dr. 1.3 $80,000 II Date Palm Dr. Varner Rd. Perez Rd. 5.5 $275,000 II Perez Rd. East Palm Canyon Dr. Date Palm Dr. 1.1 $55,000 Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 City of Cathedral City 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From o Length (mi.) Estimated Cos 1 1-10 parallel path Western city limit city limit 4.6 $4,600,0 II 30th Ave. Santoro Dr. a Vail Dr. 0.5 $25,00II Landau Blvd. JEastern Vista Chino ihalyo Rd. 1.7 $85,00II Varner Rd. Western city limitastern city limit 4.6 $230,001 Long Canyon Path Northern city limit10 parallel path 1.8 $1,800,000 City of Cathedral City 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos 1 Palm path Dr. parallel 1-10 parallel path Varner Rd. 0.9 $900,00 II Mihalyo Rd. Palm Dr. Da Vail Dr. 4.5 $225,00 II Ramon Rd. Western city limit Eastern city limit 2.0 $100,00 11 Gerald Ford Dr. Date Palm Dr. Eastern city limit 0.5 $25,00 II DaVall Dr. Mihalyo Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 2.9 $145,00 II IMcCaltum Way Landau Blvd. DaVall Dr. 2.0 $100,00 II Imountain View Rd. Northern city limit Varner Rd. 0.2 $10,00 The map on page 48 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 44 0 01n3 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Parking Existing Cathedral City has identified several locations where bicycle parking facilities exist They are listed below. • City Hall • Several racks in the Downtown area • Cathedral City Marketplace Shopping Center • Golden Mile Shopping Center • Canyon Plaza Shopping Center • Cathedral City High School • Rio Vista Elementary School • 30th Avenue Soccer Park (north side of 301h Avenue east of San Eljay Ave.) Proposed The City has proposed that future bicycle parking facilities will be sought by working with developers to provide them on a case -by -case basis. Cathedral City will also apply for funding under the BTA program to assist employers in providing bicycle parking for their employees. Specific locations identified for proposed bicycle parking include the following: • Cathedral City Senior Center • Along Highway 111 east of Date Palm Dr. in front of stores and other businesses Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City or are planned in the future. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 45 0124 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility Type 32 Vista Chino Landau Blvd. 161 TB FS Bike Rack 32 Vista Chino Landau Blvd. 167 WB FS Bike Rack 30 11l E. Palm Cyn Dr. Monty Hall Dr. 235 WB FS Bike Locker 32 Date Palm Dr. 30th Ave. 274 SB FS Bike Rack 32 30th. Ave. Date Palm Dr. 278 WB FS Bike Rack 30 Date Palm Dr. Ramon Rd. 517 SB FS Bike Rack 30 Ramon Rd. Date Palm Dr. 596 WB FS Bike Rack 111 Palm Canyon Dr. Van Fleet Ave. 687 EB NS Bike Locker 'Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection Bicycle Amenities Cathedral City currently has identified one shower and locker facility at City Hall that may be used by employees who bicycle to work. No other facilities have been identified, and none are planned in the future. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The City of Cathedral City has no bicycle safety education program at this time. The Cathedral City Police Department enforces all traffic laws, for bicycles and motor vehicles as part of their regular duties. They ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic laws and make the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of enforcement depends on the availability of officers. The Police Department also responds to particular needs and problems as they arise. In addition, the Police Department dispatches a fleet of bicycle -mounted officers during special events in the City. These officers have had special training in bicycle safety and assist in enforcing traffic laws. The Police Department also strictly enforces helmet laws, especially among young bicyclists. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Cathedral City received $315,000 from Bicycle Transportation Account funds for the Whitewater River bike path. All bike lanes have been funded by developer conditions. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 46 0125 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Future Financial Needs The City of Cathedral Cityhas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 10.7 miles, $3,210,000 • 2°d Priority Bikeways: 13.2 miles, $6,740,000 • 3.d Priority Bikeways: 13 miles, $1,505,000 • Total: 36.9 miles, $11,455,000 • Bicycle parking program: $25,000 • Total Capital Financial Need: 11,480,000 • Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 10.8miles, $34,214 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 47 0126 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Legend 81ryU P." CLM& STATUS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY 4 "1 ?" * * -T I T i, , N,b , " CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 48 0127 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 48 0127 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE N a nxa as 1 ///VVV orneo CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update L3unow� M 01''8 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Coachella Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 41 , 000 (California Department of Finance), Coachella is a small residential city in the southeast corner of the Coachella Valley. The City is located among a grid network of arterial streets that connects to its neighboring cities, Indio and La Quinta, as well as to points south along SR-86 and Highway 111, which lead to the Salton Sea and the Imperial Valley. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Grapefruit Boulevard/Highway 111, Harrison Street, Avenues 50, 52, and 54, and Van Buren and Tyler Streets. Most of Coachella's destinations are located along the arterial street network. Land Use The map on page 55 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Coachella. The City consists primarily of low -density residential, commercial, and industrial land uses. Most of the industrial uses are located along the Southern Pacific railway corridor, and most of the retail commercial is located along Harrison and 6th Streets as well as along Grapefruit Boulevard/Highway 111. Future commercial development is planned near the 1-10 freeway and east of the Whitewater River. A square -mile section of southwestern Coachella is zoned for agricultural uses. Bikeways Existing The City of Coachella currently has only one bikeway facility. It is a Class II bikeway 0.5 miles in length located along Calhoun Street between Avenues 48 and 49. Proposed Coachella has proposed 40 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 50 0129 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Coachella Top Priority Projects From To Length (mi.) Estimated CostGrapefruit Blvd. Indio city limit Southern city limit 4.4 $220,000 LCtassStreet/Path Harrison St. Grapefruit Blvd. Southern city limit 2.2 $110,000 Shady Lane Orchard St. Ave. 52 0.5 $25,000 Ave. 52Western city limit SR-86S 3.3 $165,000 7th St. Tripoli Way Grapefruit Blvd. 0.5 $25,000 II 6th St. Harrison St. Grapefruit Blvd. 0.5 $25,000 11-1 1st St. Harrison St. Grapefruit Blvd. 0.3 $6,000 1 East side of Shady Ln. Ave. 54 9th St. 1.5 $1,500,000 II 5th St. Vine Ave. Grapefruit Blvd. 0.1 $5,000 II Vine Ave. 1st St. Shady Ln. 0.5 $25,000 II Industrial Way Enterprise Way Polk St. 0.3 $15,000 II Polk St. Industrial Way Ave. 54 0.8 $40,000 Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 City of Coachella 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos West side of UPRR corridor Northern city limit Southern city limit 4.4 $4,400,000 II Enterprise Way Ave. 52 Ave. 54 1.0 $50,000 II Ave. 51 Harrison St. Jackson St. 1.3 $65,000 II Shadow View Blvd. Dillon Rd, Tyler St. 1.2 $60,00 III Bagdad Ave. Douma St. Grapefruit Blvd. 1.1 $22,00 III SR-86S Expressway Dillon Rd. Southern city limit 5.2 $104,00 II Frederick St. Mitchell Dr Ave. 54 2.7 $135,00 II Ave. 48 Jackson St. Coachella Canal 1.3 $65,00 II Ave. 49 Jackson St. Grapefruit Blvd. 2.4 $120,00 T11 Ave. 50 Western city limit Coachella Canal 5.2 $260,00 Extending from north end of Frederick Ave. 48 Mitchell Dr. 0.3 $300,00 I Coachella Canal Western city limit (Harrison St.) Southern city limit 4.1 $4,100,00 Connector to Whitewater River Grapefruit Blvd. Whitewater River 0.6 $600,00 I Whitewater River Indio city limit southern city limit 5.1 $5,100,000 I Midblock between Ave. 51 and Ave. 52 Van Buren St. Frederick St. 0.5 $500,00 Connector to Coachella Canal Industrial Way Coachella Canal 0.1 $100,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 51 0130 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Coachella 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Dillon Rd. SR-86S Ave. 44 1.7 $85,00 II Mitchell Dr. Grapefruit Blvd. Van Buren St. 0.6 $30,00 II Ave. 54 Western city limit Whitewater River 3.2 $160,00 II Calhoun St. Ave. 49 Southern city limit 0.8 $40,00 II Van Buren St. Ave. 48 Ave. 54 3.0 $150,00 II Polk St. Ave. 48 Ave. 52 2.0 $100,00 1 Tyler St. Dillon Rd. Vista del Norte 0.5 $500,00 II Vista del Norte Tyler St. Coachella Canal 0.6 $30,00 It Tyler St. Ave. 48 Ave. 50 1.0 $50,00 III Tyler St. Ave. 50 Ave. 52 1.0 $20,00 II Ave. 48 Tyler St. Coachella Canal 1.6 $80,000 II Tyler St. Grapefruit Blvd. Southern city limit 1.2 $60,000 II Airport Blvd. Whitewater River Eastern city limit 0.2 $10,00 11 Ave. 44 Harrison St. Dillon Rd. 1.1 $55,00 II Connector to 1-10 Ave. 50 1-10 1.1 $55,00 II Pierce St. Northern city limit Southern city limit (Ave. 55) 0.2 $10,00 The map on page 54 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existing The City of Coachella has no existing bicycle parking facilities that have been identified. Proposed The City plans to put bicycle racks at all schools, in City parks and along 6th Street. The City presently has no requirements for bicycle parking in new buildings. However, the City is considering enacting requirements. Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City or are planned in the future. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 52 0131 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position' Facility Type 91 Harrison St. Grapefruit Blvd. 304 SB FS Bike Rack 90 / 91 Harrison St. Ave. 50 356 SB FS Bike Rack 90 Vine Ave. 5th St. 361 NB FS Bike Rack 90 Vine Ave. 4th St. 452 SB INS Bike Rack 90 7th St. Orchard St. 968 NB FS Bike Rack 'rosition refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection Bicycle Amenities There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The City of Coachella has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. However, the City is considering enacting requirements for showers and clothing lockers in industrial parks. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Coachella has not had a bicycle safety education program. However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health and the Palm Springs Unified School District, has won a Federal Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in Coachella. The program will likely start in Federal Fiscal Year 2010-2011. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities The City of Coachella has not identified any past expenditure for bicycle facilities in the past five years. Future Financial Needs The City of Coachellahas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 14.9 miles, $2,161,000 • 2nd Priority Bikeways: 36.5miles, $15,981,000 • 3rd Priority Bikeways: 19.8miles, $1,435,000 • Total: 71.2 miles, $19,577,000 • Bicycle Parking Program: $25,000 • Total Capital Financial Need: $19,602,000 • Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 17.1 miles, $54,173 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 53 0 1'3 2 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS © w w Ix CL a W tL AIM kit'¢ a aq g QQ m t.% j X 1 I uj i I . a£9as1310 au o-= g i k t f UdMl �5H3}.4t L t?kt3Ut �ry a f �,• }.i^ ryl F t �° "1 N°S t ¢. �'"2YId3]1�D "16 .. Y ! •i ri�K3liVJ M1tl4-A�l}?' 3YItldY33Yfi'3 j . ot °aw rn :I `sNryke !i'k i ri�,aaruy k 1 w!'sup,w s aseao ° x@ 7� uficaam 1 � x � t E x Al �� -�' � K� a o .ioNs{a*iw � 37� Mdr✓rtMra ` � t � i e ' q ��i }g; qqq ,y Rwar iX r � Tav emll�t� t i5 p11av1' 4 # M r E a XSk]3fY+'tU*- .,y,, �q tFCfJNttb Olt ' tgVb'1NJt1 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 54 • 0133 CHAPTER 4LOCAL Bc�«e PLANS § ■ Da Non -Motorized Tr_mokmPl Update | 5s 0134 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 26,552(California Department of Finance), Desert Hot Springs is located in the northwestern corner of the Coachella Valley. The City has a small network of arterial streets that connects to the surrounding unincorporated areas. The City's main arterial is Palm Drive, which serves as the primarily link to the 1-10 freeway and Palm Springs to the south. Other arterials include Pierson Boulevard, Hacienda Avenue, West Drive, Mission Lakes Boulevard, and Two Bunch Palms Trail. Most of the City's destinations are located along Palm Drive and Pierson Boulevard. Land Use The map on page 62 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Desert Hot Springs. The City consists primarily of low density residential and resort spa hotel uses. Commercial office and retail uses are located along Palm Drive and Pierson Boulevard. Some industrial uses are located in the south central part of the City. New residential development has sprung up and more is planned in the western and northern parts of Desert Hot Springs. Bikeways Existing Desert Hot Springs currently has five bikeway facilities: two Class II and three Class III bikeways. They total 8.1 miles in length. The following table provides their location and length. City of Desert Hot Springs Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage II Pierson Blvd. Indian Ave. Cholla Dr. 1.8 II Palm Dr. Camino Companero Camino Aventura 0.5 III Little Morongo Rd. Pierson Blvd. southern city limit 1.8 III Palm Dr. Mission Lakes Blvd. Camino Campanero 2.5 III Mission Lakes Blvd. Little Morongo Rd. Palm Dr. 1.5 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 56 0135 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Proposed The City has proposed 28 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Desert Hot Springs Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost II Pierson Blvd., Miracle Hill Rd. Sierra Blvd. to Indian Ave. Cholla Dr. to Desert View Ave. 5 $250,000 II Indian Ave. Northern city limit Pierson Blvd. 2.2 $110,000 II West Dr. Northern city limit Southern city limit 3.0 $150,000 II Worsley Rd. Northern city limit Southern city limit 2.2 $110,000 III Mountain View Rd. Desert View Ave. Camino Campanero 1.3 $26,000 II Palm Dr. Two Bunch Palms Trail Camino Campanero 0.5 $25,000 II 8th St. West Dr. Blind Canyon 0.2 $10,000 II Hacienda Ave. Cholla Dr. Long Canyon Rd. 3.6 $180,000 II Two Bunch Palms Trail Little Morongo Rd. Hacienda Ave. 2.9 $145,000 I Blind Canyon Southern city limit to Cholla Dr. Just west of Cholla Dr. to new schools north of Mission Lakes Boulevard 0.9 $900,000 Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 City of Desert Hot Springs 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos I Flood control channel Blind Canyon Verbena Dr. 0.7 $700,00 North side of Hacienda Ave. Long Canyon Corsini Elementary School 0.3 $300,00 II Atlantic Ave. 5th St. Pierson Blvd. 0.3 $15,00 II Ocotillo Rd. Ironwood Dr. Two Bunch Palms Trail 0.3 $15,00 III Ocotillo Rd. Hacienda Dr. Ironwood Dr. 0.3 $6,000 III Mesquite Ave. Hacienda Dr. Ocotillo Rd. 0.4 $8,000 II Cactus Dr. Palm Dr. Two Bunch Palms Trail 2.1 $42,00 III Verbena Dr.,Ambrosia Dr., San Ardo Rd. Two Bunch Palms Trail 8th St. 2.0 $40,00 III 8th St. West Dr. Verbena Dr. 1.0 $20,00 I Mission Springs Park Park Lane through the park Camino Campanero just west ofAvenida Descanso 0.3 $335,33 III Little Morongo Rd. Augusta Ave. Pierson Blvd. 1.7 $34,00 1 Mission Creek Mission Lakes Blvd. Pierson Blvd. 1.2 $1,200,000 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 57 0236 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Desert Hot Springs 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Mission Lakes Blvd. Wo rsley Rd. Verbena Dr. 4.1 $205,00 III PalmHwy)(Tweynine Palm Hwy) s northern city limit southern city limit 2.1 $42, III Santa Cruz Rd. northern city Limit West Dr. 1.1 $22,00 III Desert View Ave. West Dr. Mountain View Rd. 2.0 $40,00 I Desert View Ave. Miracle Hill Rd. ountain View Rd. 0.5 $500,00 I ountain View Rd. Desert View Ave. IHacienda Ave. 0.2 $200,00 The map on page 61 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existin The City of Desert Hot Springs has no existing bicycle parking facilities that have been identified within the city. Proposed The City will initiate a bicycle parking program to put bike racks at: • All schools • Wardman Park • Mission Springs Park • Tedesco Park • City Hall • In downtown The City currently has no requirements for bicycle parking in new buildings. Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 58 0137 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility Type 14 Palm Dr. Two Bunch Palm Tr. 1 NB NS Bike Rack 14 Palm Dr. Hacienda Ave. 2 NB NS Bike Rack 14 Palm Dr. Hacienda Ave. 5 SB FS Bike Rack 14 Palm Dr. Buena Vista Ave. 483 SB NS Bike Rack 14 Palm Dr. Buena Vista Ave. 621 NB NS Bike Rack 14 West St. Pierson Blvd. 763 SB NS Bike Rack 14 Palm Dr. Two Brunch Palm Tr. 765 SB FS Bike Rack 14 Hacienda Ave. Don English Wy. 859 WB FS Bike Rack -rosition refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection Bicycle Amenities There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The City has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Desert Hot Springs has not had a bicycle safety education program. However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health and the Palm Springs Unified School District, has won a Federal Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in Desert Hot Springs. The program wilt likely start in Federal Fiscal Year 2010-2011. The Desert Hot Springs Police Department enforces all traffic laws, for bicycle and motor vehicles as part of their regular duties. They ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic laws and make the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of enforcement depends on the availability of officers. The Police Department also responds to particular needs and problems as they arise. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities The City received an SB 821 grant for $69,000 which they matched with City funds to widen 8th Street for new sidewalks and bike lanes. The City received a $195,000 SB 821 grant for the bike lanes on Pierson Boulevard. The City will use its own funds to add bike lanes to Palm Drive from Camino Aventura to Camino Idilio. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 59 0 138 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Future Financial Needs The City of Desert Hot Springshas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 21.8 miles, $1,906,000 • 2Id Priority Bikeways: 10.6 miles, $2,715,330 • 3'd Priority Bikeways: 10 miles, $1,009,000 • Total: 42.4 miles, $5,630,330 • Bicycle Parking Program: $25,000 • Total Capital Financial Needs: $5,655,330 • Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 4.1 miles, $12,989 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 60 E39 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS I ¢• 2. F i. i y �'m7rntxa, aT r � i1V N5'k3 'a 3 I iS 3lffiXG^ ".� i lApy �3MN4+Ns�tiM6N tB �.9W3.'g• y... .. 3 L3N S r_ 2` N3IA1 ..... , i"N H3U°114 Si, S �1 �J� s CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update as 61 0140 DUiR LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS i �\ 2 RL Da Non -Motorized Tr_RrU lan Update m CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Indian Wells Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 5,093(California Department of Finance), Indian Wells is a city primarily of residential, resort, and golf course communities. The City has a small network of arterial streets that connects to its two neighboring cities, Palm Desert and La Quinta. The City's main arterial is Highway 111, which is the primary east -west arterial through the City. Other arterials include Fred Waring Drive, Cook Street and Eldorado Drive. Most of Indian Wells' destinations are located along Highway 111. Land Use The map on page 67 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Indian Wells. The City consists primarily of low density residential, golf course communities, and resort uses with some existing commercial office and retail uses located along Highway 111 and at the Tennis Stadium near Miles Avenue and Washington Street. The City has no industrial uses. Future commercial development is planned near Highway 111 and Miles Avenue. The southern mountains are zoned as undeveloped land. Bikeways Existing Indian Wells currently has several existing bikeways. They include Class II and III facilities. They total 4.9 miles in length. Existing bikeway facilities are listed below. City of Indian Wells Existing Bikeways From To Mileage Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. Fairway Dr. 1.1 rClassStreet/Path Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Just north of Fairway Dr. 0.9 Eldorado Dr. North of Fairway Dr. Fairway Dr. 0.1 II Miles Ave. Warner Trail Washington St. 0.9 III Fairway Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 1.0 III Rancho Palmeras Dr. Highway 111 Fairway Dr. 0.5 III Miles Ave. Highway 111 Warner Trail 0.4 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 63 .++ 0142 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Proposed One new bikeway projectisincluded in this Plan. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our Local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Indian Wells Top Priority Project Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost III lWarner Trail Fred Waring Dr. IMiles Ave. 1 0.4 1 $8,000 The map on page 66 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existing The City of Indian Wells has no existing bicycle parking facilities that have been identified, and none are planned in the future. Proposed There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The City of Indian Wells has no requirements for bicycle parking in new buildings. Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # I Direction I Position' I Facility Type 111 Hwy. 1 t 1 Indian Wells Ln. 544 EB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Indian Wells Ln. 564 WB FS Bike Rack 'Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 64 oiO CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Amenities The City of Indian Wells has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Indian Wells currently has no bicycle safety education program. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities All existing bikeways have been funded with general funds. Future Financial Needs The City of Indian Wellshas the following future financial needs: • Total: 0.4 miles, $8,000 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 65 ..n. 0144 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS t tt � aun&'Fa�n � tawomr � V V) ll!J K mam ism eAti {§ t13 0 31vt �z & F Q �„Lu mnr`rarian uaroasa '`'J7� t ✓arrrux s'1`" t'S j a......... .❑aorta m.-.a � Z of It it .may 1• W I( 3 Y ,E ail t7 il.�'°vods a` "°reaneaxa id $aaka /� ¢217 P;. T "t8.%r1.3Aws ,.A. tntct 9 0 a a a i gg "•i nbbTll�rt+6,a 3fJ Y 1 1 1 t j( ijamnaemwa m pj qfe to F rp; e m fi +91a1'.a ud c � �` +zttv�awf vaxana ' ," .,i¢t atava .'+. �.y„�, � .. •'a�t� _�" f '_.i erg, uw�v:-�. �M3fifYl BbifsY LV-ASCR Q u � �(Ef :(: t� tl)M1SFd - � i H] 9Y14 - � 41 � Pt.Ia•MOYi� : � 1a6113V Mn3Nl x' M t J ui tr5aa6v to ygjp �' 7ll'!' _d{ S M1 4MPllfl6 (• ,.._ Q' ter• Al � ni roaaartsna,kt iwx+rip � ��5� i U< ryx;Wiacani $5r arsoti��d�o. �nwwrxr�. is AW . �t ,'` • :- xrvpura g � i � F Ti + . rnrrs#aruxem-,- :. +e'er . _._..__— t p aA..�u Nemrua E t y�{+5 rc� a ' ox� �pC vu�,y.utvsrmi�I Aaxh'la g Ya r s } - ....r It .a C CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 0145 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CITY OF INDIAN WELLS GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 67 .» 0146 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Indio Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 82,230(California Department of Finance), Indio is a residential and industrial city that has undergone much residential development over the past 20 years. The City has a developed grid network of arterial streets that connects to its two neighboring cities, La Quinta and Coachella, as well as to the surrounding unincorporated areas. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Jefferson, Monroe, and Jackson Streets, Avenue 42, Avenue 46, Avenue 48, Avenue 50, Highway 111, Fred Waring Drive, Indio Boulevard, and Dillon Road. Most of Indio's destinations are located along the arterial street network. Land Use The map on page 75 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Indio. The City consists primarily of medium- and low -density residential with industrial uses being located along Indio Boulevard and the Southern Pacific rail corridor. Commercial office and retail uses are located along the Highway 111 corridor, along Indio Boulevard and on Jackson Street north of 1-10. Future commercial development is planned north of the 1-10 freeway, and residential development is planned in most other undeveloped areas that are not within the Indio Boulevard industrial corridor. The area in the northern part of the City that was recently annexed is currently shown as zoned for very low -density residential and agricultural uses. Bikeways Existin Indio currently has several existing bikeways. They total 18.9 miles in length.Existing bikeways are listed on the following page. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 68 0147 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Indio Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage II Jefferson St. Indio Blvd. Ave. 50 4.0 1 Jefferson St. Ave. 38 Ave. 39 0.5 II Madison St. Indio Blvd. Fred Waring Dr. 0.6 II Madison St. Miles Ave. Hwy. 111 1.0 11 Clinton St. Miles Ave. Hwy. 111 1.0 II Monroe St. Ave. 40 1000' N of Ave. 42 1.0 II Calhoun St. Doctor Carreon Blvd. Ave. 48 0.5 II Ave. 41 Monroe St. Jackson St. 1.0 II Ave. 42 Jackson St. Golf Center Pkwy. 1.0 II Doctor Carreon Blvd. Bristol St. Calhoun St. 0.4 II Fred Waring Dr. 600' E of Jefferson St. Madison St. 0.9 II Golf Center Pkwy. Ave. 42 Ave. 43 0.5 11 Jackson St. 1000' N of Ave. 41 800' N of Ave. 42 0.5 II Jackson St. 1-10 Ave. 44 0.6 11 Jackson St. Hwy. 111 Doctor Carreon Blvd. 0.5 II Ave. 40 Madison St. Monroe St. 1.0 II Ave. 46 Madison St. Aladdin St. 0.8 II Miles Ave. Clinton St. Dune Palms Rd. 2.0 II Gore St. Ave. 41 1000' N of Ave. 42 0.3 II Golf Center Pkwy. 1-10 Hwy. 111 0.9 Proposed The City of Indio has 50 proposed bikeway projects to be included in this Plan, including top priority projects and other long-term projects. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 69 0143 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Indio Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost I Whitewater River Western city limit Eastern city limit 5.5 $5,500,000 II Miles Ave. Clinton St. Monroe St. 0.5 $25,000 11 Ave. 46 Shields Rd. Madison St. 0.5 $25,000 II Indio Blvd. Jefferson St. Dillon Rd. 5.1 $255,000 II Jefferson St. Ave. 39 Varner Rd. 0.9 $45,000 II Monroe St. 1000' N of Ave. 42 Ave. 42 0.2 $10,000 II Monroe St. Ave. 49 Ave. 52 1.5 $75,000 III Monroe St. Ave. 42 Ave. 49 3.5 $70,000 II Jackson St. 800' N of Ave. 42 1-10 0.5 $25,000 III Jackson St. Ave. 44 Hwy. 111 1.0 $20,000 II Jackson St. Doctor Carreon Blvd. Ave. 52 2.5 $125,000 II Oasis St. 1000' N of Doctor Carreon Blvd. Ave. 48 0.7 $35,000 III Oasis St. Indio Blvd. Hwy. 111 0.4 $8,000 III Civic Center Dr. Oasis St. Indio Blvd. 0.4 $8,000 III Requa Ave. Monroe St. Indio Blvd. 1.3 $26,000 II Fred Waring Dr. Jefferson St. 600' E of Jefferson St. 0.1 $5,000 II Gore St. 1000' N of Ave. 42 Ave. 42 0.2 $10,000 11 Dune Palms Dr. Miles Ave. Westward Ho Dr. 0.5 $25,000 III Westward Ho Dr. Dune Palms Rd. Jefferson St. 0.5 $10,000 11 Ave. 43 Calhoun St. Golf Center Pkwy. 0.25 $12,500 Bicycle Parking Program $50,000 City of Indio 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Fred Waring Dr./Ave. 44 Madison St. Dillon Rd. 5.2 $260,00 II Doctor Carreon Blvd. Highway 111 to Bristol St. Calhoun St. to Van Buren St. 2.2 $110,00 II Clinton St. Indio Blvd. Miles Ave. 0.7 $35,000 II Ave. 39 Adams St. Jefferson St. 1.0 $50,00 III Ave. 45 Market St. Jackson St. 0.4 $8,000 III Market St./Dillon Ave. Ave. 44 Emerald Ave. 1.3 $26,00 III Palo Verde Ave. Ave. 44 Ave. 45 0.5 $10,00 II Ave. 40 Varner Rd. Madison St. 2.5 $125,00 II Ave. 50 Jefferson St. Eastern city limit 3.3 $180,00 II Varner Rd. Jefferson St. Ave. 42 0.8 $40,00 II Ave. 42 Varner Rd. Jackson St. 2.5 $125,00 11 Ave. 48 Jefferson St. Jackson St. 3.0 $150,00 III Arabia St. Highway 111 Ave. 48 1.0 $20,00 II Golf Center Pkwy. Ave. 43 1-10 0.8 $40,00 III Miles Ave. Monroe St. Oasis St. 0.8 $16,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 70 0149 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Indio 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects (Continued) II Ave. 38 Adams St. Madison St. 2.0 $100,00 II Adams St. Ave. 38 Ave. 40 1.0 $50,00 II Madison St. Ave. 38 Ave. 40 1.0 $50,00 II Burr St. Indio Blvd. Fred Waring Dr. 0.8 $40,00 II Madison St. Fred Waring Dr. Miles Ave. 0.5 $25,000 II Madison St. Hwy. 111 Ave. 52 2.5 $125,00 III Kenner Ave. Ave. 44 (via Saguaro St./Adobe Rd.) Jackson St. 1.0 $20,00 II Ave. 45 Jackson St. Golf Center Pkwy. 0.6 $30,00 III Ave. 45/Van Buren St./Cabazon Rd. Golf Center Pkwy. Dillon Rd. 1.9 $38,00 III Date Ave. Jackson St. Indio Blvd. 1.7 $34,00 III Calhoun St. Hwy. 111 Doctor Carreon Blvd. 0.5 $10,00 III Van Buren St. Indio Blvd. Ave. 48 0.5 $10,00 II Ave. 52 IMadison St. Jackson St. 1.0 $50,00 City of Indio 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path IFrom ITo Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Eastside Dr. Madison St. Monroe St. 1.0 $50,000 The map on page 74 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existing Indio has identified locations where bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below. • City Hall • Indio Fashion Mall • Riverside County Administrative Center Proposed The City will add bicycle parking at: • All parks CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 71 0150" CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS The downtown transportation center The City Planning Code requires bicycle parking at all new commercial development. This is also a standard condition of approval on each development project. Links to Other Transportation Modes Indio is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. An Amtrak and Greyhound multi -modal transit station is planned for Indio on Indio Boulevard near Jackson Street. No park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City or are planned in the future. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility Type 111 / 80 Hwy. 111 Dr. Carreon Blvd. 93 EB MB Bike Rack 80 Towne St. Bliss Ave. 96 SB NS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Monroe St. 100 WB MB Bike Rack 80 Monroe St. Hoover St. 107 NB FS Bike Rack 80 Monroe St. Fred Waring Dr. 321 SB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Clinton St. 333 WB MB Bike Rack 80 Ave. 48 Jackson St. 374 WB FS Bike Rack 80 Requa Ave. Park St. 389 WB NS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Monroe St. 550 EB FS Bike Rack 80 Ave. 44 Smurr St. 790 WB NS Bike Rack 80 Ave. 44 Jackson St. 798 EB NS Bike Rack 111 1110 90/91 Hwy. 111 Flower St. 835 EB FS Bike Locker 'Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection Bicycle Amenities There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The City will add amenities at a new park between Market Street, Avenue 44 and Dillon Avenue. Indio also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance that provides credit to developers that preserve two percent of the gross floor area for showers and clothing lockers, as one of 26 TDM options. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 72 ..,, 0151 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The Indio Youth Task Force funds bicycle safety education that is delivered by the City Police Department. At least 100 children are trained annually. This program is expected to continue indefinitely. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Indio has not received any grants for bikeways. However, it has striped bike lanes along with the striping of selected streets. Future Financial Needs The City of Indiohas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 26.1 miles, $6,314,500 • 2Id Priority Bikeways: 41.0 miles, $1,777,000 • 3rd Priority Bikeways: 1.0, $50,000 • Total: 68.1 miles, $8,141,000 • Bicycle Parking Program: $50,000 • Total Capital Financial Needs: $8,191,500 Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 6.0 miles, $19,008 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 73 0152 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 74 133 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Legend GnrSfApbn cf�a fbf �c Nml. awtc 6EM :. MmMxNI Rtkfdun. 4s+xeaMwa. ap}e..43iR+a+if cm� ewtatea o:vaesbne ua�fvkl. +I+SY nmti� (v iF�� R�} pyayCmw'/M4RLL+L �?p..ry 63aSieaxw+. AA WaYCY4 uu"a"u 6vvw.ti od Lw.u� .YY. y.�Laau..-(YaM �trliaf ixti[xa �f'�YSM fmuvfn ti .; ae«aeeuvv co teem -,-_,;S Wu. cep baw.iaav a. Wei°°vp wbpaG Sxwr'-:.'tysbrSrrtle swac4....rz..e.aan TL.. I``i�� At t AkB1]NCaw 14aiek✓�a I 4 kl .. r1'. vav WbYIib4va1. I piptlMYviNMY1Wi;. �fN�\ A5 O G}5 65 i CITY OF INDIO GENERAL PLAN LAN© USE CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update `" yM 75 0154 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of La Quinta Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 43,778(California Department of Finance), La Quinta is a residential and resort city in the southern portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is located among a grid network of arterial streets that connects to its neighboring cities, Indio, Indian Wells, and Coachella. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Fred Waring Drive, Miles Avenue, Highway 111, Avenues 48, 50, 52, and Washington, Madison, and Jefferson Streets. Most of La Quinta's destinations are located along the arterial street network. Land Use The map on page 83 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of La Quinta. The City consists primarily of low- and medium -density residential, commercial, and golf resort land uses. Most of the retail and office commercial uses are located along or near Highway 111. A new retail center, called the Village District, has been built near the Civic Center. The La Quinta Cove in the west part of the City is where medium -density residential is located, and many golf course communities are located in the central and southern parts of La Quinta. Undeveloped areas are currently zoned for low -density residential in the valley areas and agricultural or open space in the hills. Bikeways Existing La Quinta currently has many existing bikeways. They total 34 miles in length.Existing facilities are listed below. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 76 0155 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of La Quinta Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage I Bear Creek Eisenhower Dr. Calle Tecate 2.7 II Miles Ave. Washington St. to Adams St. Dune Palms Rd. to Jefferson St. 1.2 II Westward Ho Dr. Adams St. Jefferson St. 1.0 II Ave. 48 Washington St. Jefferson St. 1.5 II Ave. 50 Just west of Park Ave. Vista Montana Rd. 1.9 II Calle Tampico Eisenhower Dr. Calle Rondo to Park 1.4 II Calle Sinaloa/Ave. 52 Eisenhower Dr. to Jefferson St. Coachella Canal to Monroe St. Z 9 II Ave. 54 Jefferson St. Monroe St. 2.0 II Airport Blvd. Madison St. Monroe St. 1.0 II Ave. 58 Madison St. Just west of Monroe St. 0.7 II Ave. 60 Madison St. Monroe St. 1.0 II Catle Tecate/Avenida Bermudas Avenida Diaz Calle Sinaloa 2.2 II Washington St. Eisenhower Dr. Ave. 52 1.5 II Eisenhower Dr. Ave. 50 Avenida Montezuma 0.6 II Park Ave. Ave. 50 CalleTampico 0.5 11 Adams St. Hwy. 111 Ave. 48 0.6 II Dune Palms Rd. Westward Ho Dr. to Whitewater River Hwy.111 to Ave. 48 0.8 II Jefferson St. Northern city limit Ave. 54 4.8 II Madison St. Ave. 54 Ave. 60 3.1 II Monroe St. Ave. 52 to Ave. 54 Mountain View Ln. to Ave. 58 2 6 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 77 u 0156 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Proposed La Quinta has proposed 17 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of La Quinta Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost I Whitewater River Washington St. Jefferson St. 1.7 $1,700,000 II Calle Tampico Washington St. Calle Rondo 0.3 $15,000 II Ave. 50 Washington St. to just west of Park Ave. Via Montana to Madison St. 0.6 $30,000 III Desert Club Dr. Calle Tampico Ave. 52 0.4 $8,000 II Eisenhower Dr. Avenida Montezuma Calle Sinaloa 0.2 $10,000 III Eisenhower Dr. Washington St. Avenida Fernando 1.0 $20,000 Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 City of La Quinta 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Miles Ave. Adams St. Dune Palms Rd. 0.5 $25,00 II Ave. 52 Jefferson St. Coachella Canal 0.4 $20,00 II Avenida Bermudas southbound only Calle Tampico Calle Sinaloa 0.4 $20,00 II Hwy. 111 Washington St. Indio city limit 1.7 $85,00 II Jefferson St. Ave. 59 Madison St. 3.9 $195,00 City of La Quinta 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Madison St. Ave. 50 to Ave. 52 Ave. 60 to Jefferson St. 3.8 $190,00 II Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 1.5 $75,00 III Ave. 50 Eisenhower Dr. Washington St. 0.8 $16,00 II Ave. 58 Just west of Monroe St. Monroe St. 0.3 $15,00 II Ave. 6 Monroe St. Eastern city limit 0.2 $10,00 II Ave. 62 Madison St. Monroe St. 1.0 $50,00 II Monroe St. ve. 54 to Mountain View Ln. Ave. 58 to Ave. 62 2.5 $125,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 7a O1r.? CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS The map on page 82 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existin La Quinta has identified locations where bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below. Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley La Quinta Village District One Eleven La Quinta shopping center La Quinta Plaza shopping center Most major shopping centers along Highway 111 La Quinta Resort and Club Riverside County Fire Department Library Sports complex at the end of Park Avenue La Quinta Park Fritz Burns Park La Quinta Museum All schools 4 rest stops along Bear Creek path Proposed La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.50.160 requires bicycle racks at new nonresidential developments. The requirements vary according to the land use. Specific locations for proposed bicycle parking include the following: La Quinta Senior Center City Hall CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 79 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City or are planned in the future. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Lines) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position` Facility Type 70 Adams St. Hwy. 111 84 SB FS Bike Locker 7o Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico 87 NB AS Bike Rack 70 Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico 88 SB FS Bike Rack 70 Washington St. Calle Tampico 298 NB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 1t1 Washington St. 547 CB- FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Adams St. 561 WB FS Bike Locker 111 Hwy. 111 Adams St. 571 EB FS Bike Locker 70 Calle Tampico Washington St. 869 WB FS Bike Rack 70 Adams St. Hwy. 111 891 NB NS Bike Rack 'Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the Intersection Bicycle Amenities Four locations have been identified that provide these showers and clothing lockers for employees and/or patrons. These are listed below. Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley La Quinta Resort and Club Riverside County Fire Department La Quinta Fitness Center City Hall La Quinta also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance that requires developers to preserve two percent of the gross floor area for showers and clothing lockers. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The City of La QuintaPolice Department holds an annual bicycle safety fair for youth. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 80 0159 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities All existing bike lanes have been constructed from development exactions.Some trails, such as the Bear Creek Trail have used a variety of public funds. Future Financial Needs The City of La Quintahas the following future financial needs: Top Priority Bikeways: 4.2 miles, $1,783,000 2nd Priority Bikeways: 6.9, $345,000 3rd Priority Bikeways: 10.1, $481,000 Total: 21.2 miles, $2,609,000 Bicycle Parking Program: $25,000 Total Capital Financial Needs: $2,634,000 Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 4.2miles, $13,306 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 151 0160 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS EXISTING AND PROPOSED al BICYCLE FACILMES guy CITY OF LA QUINTA m � iIiaii 4 '35�}3 'v'Ne PCS'dARO �pp-T�gF �t 88 Gy I pAF4 Cdt - i11H Niir. t- kx �y Earn NIE G.mmlmE; -' bJEAY t t 9a4+ fjj � 91CN q t L) NIMH+E .A♦5 � -r i ,��i .3 � h s 1.\ g tt2t 4br y #WTAE 4F Legend t t earreF. emsab. mush wnsnp ! 'L'�irr+wa �g c -�VYU IG-Ra Fli Gkb iL fnuq Aflb t EI - •. wul5 rm e+�rvuaW Timitek�elr puling � E � . ��(]aaY0.'Wy Wf..G169 �."'RfT4aW:tcS.w ; r1 - f 12 wulvgdtm.PrN+M ®.,#wLWa 4 kl z Wi�l:RbGbsAt66Mi t-] � p ry (1nnGr@i'ax Rvm Ryw.� P1Fa6�R �.IgI!Nit4 ~ *' �r 81 YYI. AtG �xtstfdhxYMaa •3 ��VneNY dStttax[. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update U 0161 A 5 00 �AneU CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS L%90d n 6dMHA1 PIdn ldM WdIU IPU� %quiC. %CA6 .,.. AwwW i�eC� T�sa//obi CaawYr,eu+. Yp, 4tYi Y+tiLaat [iT{+Y}ia.;aoWIM6Aum Cawnl+'�'=,llmil.`+�w F+,+4e� ':'.i CdN4tXl$ MM4aewMMINA*1 -j4Y�e AACN k: .�' i^e [A AP.. £t'yi 4M Utn nryR�tl�wieryiaee' WtiMM1i ii:!. Vu. �i CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAID LAND USE �PYM onset"W CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 83 0169 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Desert Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 51,509(California Department of Finance), Palm Desert is a multi -faceted community with College of the Desert, regional retail, government agencies, residential and resort uses. The City has a grid network of arterial streets that connects to its two neighboring cities, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells, as well as to the surrounding unincorporated areas, such as Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Gerald Ford, Frank Sinatra, and Fred Waring Drives, Hovley Lane, Monterey and Portola Avenues, Cook Street, and Highway 111 and SR-74. Most of Palm Desert's destinations lie along the arterial street network. Land Use The map on page 91 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Palm Desert. The City consists of low density residential, civic buildings, regional retail centers, and resorts uses with most of the commercial uses located along Highway 111, Monterey Avenue and El Paseo. Some industrial uses are located along Cook Street. College of the Desert is adjacent to the civic center and enrolls students from around the Coachella Valley. Palm Desert also has art galleries and the Living Desert Reserve. Future industrial and commercial development is planned near the I- 10 freeway in the north of the City, and residential development is planned for the north central and eastern areas of Palm Desert. The University of California Riverside and the California State University San Bernardino are developing extension campuses at the intersection of Cook Street and Gerald Ford Drive. Bikeways Existin Palm Desert currently has many existing bikeways. They total 54.8 miles in length. Existing bikeways are listed in the following table. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 0163 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Desert Existing Bikeways th From To Mileage re Dr. Monterey Ave. Portola Ave. 0.9 r. %PacificAve. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 0.9 rd Dr. Monterey Ave. Cook St. 2.0 e. Gerald Ford Dr. College Dr. 0.3 II College Dr. Portola Ave. Frank Sinatra Dr. 1.4 II Technology Dr. College Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 0.1 11 Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Ave. Tamarisk Row Dr. 3.3 II Tamarisk Row Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 1.4 II Country Club Dr. Monterey Ave. Washington St. 5.1 II Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Lane East 1.0 II Hovley Lane West Monterey Ave. Portola Ave. 1.0 II Hovley Lane East Cook St. Washington St. 3.1 II Magnesia Falls Dr=H74 Monterey Ave. Deep Canyon Rd. 1.5 II Fred Waring Dr. Ave. Deep Canyon Rd. 0.8 II Haystack Rd.Portola Ave. 1.3 II Mesa View Dr.Portola Ave. 0.8 II Hwy. 74Palowet Dr. 3.1 II San Pablo Ave.g Dr. Hwy. 111 0.5 II Portola Ave. Dr. Country Club Dr. 2.4 II Portola Ave. Fairway Dr. Mesa View Dr. 1.8 II 35th Ave. Monterey Ave. Dinah Shore Dr. 0.7 II Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 3.0 II Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Hwy. 111 1.0 II Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Hovley Lane East 2.0 II A St. Monterey Ave. Gateway Dr. 0.3 II University Park Dr. College Dr. Cook St. 0.5 II Park View Dr. Hwy. 111 Monterey Ave. 0.8 III California Dr./ Ave. of the States Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. 2.1 III Florida Ave., Elkhorn Trail California Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 1.0 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 85 0164 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Desert Existing Bikeways (continued) III Fairway Dr. Portola Ave. Cook St. 1.0 III Warner Trail Ave. 42 Fred Waring Dr. 1.0 I Whitewater Channel Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 0.5 II Michigan Dr. Warner Trail Ave. of the States 0.4 II Painters Path Edgehill Dr. El Paseo 0.3 III De Anza Dr. San Carlos Ave. Alessandro Dr. 1.0 III Deep Canyon Rd. Hwy. 111 Fairway Dr. 0.5 III El Paseo Hwy. 111 (west) Hwy. 111 (east) 1.9 III Grapevine St. Hwy. 74 Portola Ave. 1.2 III Idaho St. Michigan Dr. Hovely Ln. (east) 0.1 III Plaza Way Hwy. 111 El Paseo 0.2 III San Gorgonio Way Monterey Ave. San Carlos Ave. 0.5 III San Pablo Ave. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 0.5 III Shadow Mountain Dr. Hwy. 74 Portola Ave. 1.6 Proposed Palm Desert has proposed five bikeway projects to be included in this Plan divided into top priority projects and other long-term projects. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Palm Desert Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost Mid -Valley Bike Path (SPRR corridor) Western city limit Eastern city limit 7.0 $7,000,000 1 Palm Valley Channel Western city limit Painters Path 2.7 $2,700,000 Signing of the routes of Palm Desert Map $75,000 City of Palm Desert 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects /Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos ld Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 1.0 $50,00 ftt erey Ave. Gerald FordDr. South of Shadow Ridge Rd. 0.6 $30,OOC ola Ave. Country Club Dr. Magnesia Falls Dr. 1.5 $75,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 86 0165 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Although not shown on the maps, or in priority tables, a bike path along the Whitewater River is a potential future project for the City. Much of the land along the River is privately owned and constructing a bike path there would require negotiation or a developer agreement for this to happen. The map on page 90 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities Bicycle Parking Existin Palm Desert has.identified several locations where bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below. City Halt College of the Desert California State University San Bernardino extension campus University of Riverside extension campus The Living Desert Several locations along El Paseo Monterey Shore Plaza shopping center Entrepreneur and Enfield Lanes Post Office Hovley and Washington Street Waring Shopping Center Palm Desert Town Center All schools All parks Proposed Bicycle parking will be added at College of the Desert as proposed by the College. Bicycle parking will also be added at the Portola Community Center. The City also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance that requires bicycle parking at 5 percent of auto parking spaces at new commercial developments. Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update ui 0166 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Lines) Street Cross Street Slop # Direction Position' FacilityType 50 Country Club Dr. Monterey Ave. 52 EB FS Bike Rack 111 Town Center Way Hahn 65 NB NS Bike Locker 111 50 Town Center Way Hahn 67 SB NS Bike Locker 32 Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. 205 WB FS Bike Rack 111 50 Hwy. 111 Desert Crossing 536 EB NS Bike Rack 111 Monterey Ave. San Gorgonio Wy, 778 NB NS Bike Rack 70 Harris Ln. Washington Sl. 839 WB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Monterey Ave. 873 EB FS Bike Rack 32 Dinah Shore Dr. Shoppers Ln. 938 WB FS Bike Rack `Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) or the in[ersecuon Bicycle Amenities Showers and clothing lockers will be available to bicycle commuters at College of the Desert. The City of Palm Desert Transportation Demand Management ordinance requiresnew nonresidential developments to preserve two percent of the gross floor area ratio for employee locker and shower facilities. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The Police Department has a bicycle safety education program. Theyhave a full time Public Information Officer that promotes bicycle safety issues to anyone who is interested. Generally, the Department gives theprogram to elementary students grades 4 through 7. They provide basic information about safe riding techniques and the vehicle code. Parents are encouraged to attend so they can support the safety message to their children. The Police Department gives out helmets to students that do not have one. The officer provides a helmet instruction course, and shows safety videos whenever someone wants to view them. They typically show the videos at the Police Station. The Police will visit schools to show the videos as well. The Police also put on a public safety fair once a year. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update uu 0161 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Palm Desert is applying to become recognized by the League of American Bicyclists as a 'Bicycle -Friendly Community." The League has certified instructors in Palm Desert who plan to go to schools to host bicycle safety education events. The Palm Desert Police Department enforces all traffic laws, for bicycles and motor vehicles as part of their regular duties. They ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic laws and make the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of enforcement depends on the availability of officers. The Police Department uses targeted enforcement to encourage motorists and cyclists to share the road. The Police Department also responds to particular needs and problems as they arise. In addition, the Police Department dispatches a fleet of bicycle -mounted officers in the City. These officers have had special training in bicycle safety and assist in enforcing traffic laws. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Palm Desert received $2.3 million in Congestion Management and Air Quality funds for the Mid -Valley Bike Path along the right-of-way next to the railroad track parallel to I- 10. The City has funded bike lanes from its own General Fund, as well as from other funds. Since 2001, approximately 23 miles of bike lanes have been added. The Police Department receives a grant that supports the cost of presentations at elementary schools. Future Financial Needs The City of Palm Deserthas the following future financial needs: Top Priority Bikeways: 9.7 miles, $9,700,000 2°d Priority Bikeways: 2.5, $155,000 Total: 12.8 miles, $9,930,000 Signing of the routes of Palm Desert Map: $75,000 Total Capital Financial Needs: $10,005,000 Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 10.2 miles, $32,314 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 89 0163 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 90 0169 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE � �yy Mv;, x des ^ _ ;h 'r« ttit J -x to vs s nzs ox + vuk� g€ i49�nd #fi[ auur.: ecM 5 trO+R+^blAw:]tuw fP raa N1/CYW+x. fr rj`:`•�41m M.+vM � i�CAttux.GAR tleY)tMr tl: j�fvW Yuu ivewuu ie:.a Wa'WAiW �M t F. ... .... ....� Ft. i �W.nvAMM. KwtM �YmnPlx•lrhab 1NY# ��U`e b++rra -4eyYNur+ �iLa�rs �'. f» 1NMM rr]Weowwv� �qaV� y, k.Wennn CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 91 0170 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Springs Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 47,601 (California Department of Finance), Palm Springs is a major tourist destination city with resorts and golf communities as well as an established residential base. The City has a developed grid network of arterial streets that connects to Cathedral City as well as to the surrounding unincorporated areas. Some of the main arterial streets in the network include Vista Chino, Ramon Road, North, South, and East Palm Canyon Drives, Sunrise Way, Farrell Drive, Racquet Club Road, and Indian Canyon Drive. Most of Palm Springs' destinations are located along the arterial street network, especially along Palm Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives in the downtown retail district. Land Use The map on page 100 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Palm Springs. The City consists primarily of medium- and low -density residential with many resort uses near the downtown area. Commercial office and retail uses are primarily located along Ramon Road and North and East Palm Canyon Drives, especially in the downtown area. The City is home to Palm Springs International Airport, and many industrial uses are located near the airport site. The far northern part of the City contains utility uses, which includes a wind farm for renewable energy. Future residential development is planned in the northern part of the existing developed area of the City. The College of the Desert plans to open a new campus near the Whitewater River and Indian Canyon Drive. Outlying areas are planned for very low density residential, such as on Indian reservation land, and undeveloped land. Bikeways Existin Palm Springs currently has numerous bikeways. The City has designated several loop routes in the central portion of the City primarily geared toward the tourist visitor. These loop routes consist of Class I, II, and III facilities. They total 28.2 miles in length. Existing bicycle and trail facilities are listed below. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update VL 0171 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways From To Mileage Tahquitz Creek Calle Palo Fierro to Sunrise WayyMesquite Sunn Dunes Rd. to Farrell Dr. 1.3 riassStreet/Path Dr. El Cielo Rd Demuth Park Rd. 0.3 Demuth Park Rd. Mesquite Ave. Class I Bike Path 0.5 Tahquitz Canyon Way Calle El Segundo Civic Dr. 1.7 II Sunny Dunes Rd. Camino Real Sunrise Way 0.6 III Sunny Dunes Rd. Belardo Rd. to Camino Real Sunrise Way to Class I bike path; Compadre Rd. to El Cielo Rd. 0.9 III Compadre Rd. Just north of Sunny Dunes Rd. Sunny Dunes Rd. 0.1 II Museum Dr./ Belardo Rd. Alejo Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Way 0.5 II Golf Club Dr. W Ave. East Palm Canyon Dr. 0.8 III Vista Chino Cerritos Dr. Gene Autry Trail 1.0 III Tachevah Dr. North Palm Canyon Dr. Avenida Caballeros 0.6 III Tahquitz Canyon Way Belardo Rd. Calle El Segundo 0.4 III Ramon Rd. Cahuilla Rd. El Cielo Rd. 2.2 III Mesquite Ave. Camino Real Farrell Dr. 1.2 III La Verne Way South Palm Canyon Dr. Sunrise Way 1.1 III Belardo Rd./Cahuilla Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Way Sunny Dunes Rd. 0.3 III Indian Canyon Dr. Tachevah Dr. Camino Parocela 1.6 III Calle Encilla Alejo Dr. Ramon Rd. 0.5 III South Palm Canyon Dr./ East Palm Canyon Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. Camino Real 1.2 III Camino Real Riverside Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. 2.0 III Toledo Ave. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr. 0.9 III Murray Canyon Dr. Camino Real Toledo Ave. 0.6 IN Manzanita Ave./Deep Well Rd. Mesquite Ave. East Palm Canyon Dr. 0.7 try Trail Ramon Rd. East Palm Canyon Dr. 1.6 r./Alejo Dr./Civic Dr. TamariskRd. Tahquitz Canyon Way 1.3h Dr./Via Lola/ del Corto/Camino Sur/ Centro/Camino Norte/./Stevens Rd./ Vista/ FViaMonte Camino del Norte/ Stevens Rd./Rose Ave./ Crescent Dr. /Patencio Rd. / Chino Dr./Belardo Rd./Alejo Dr. North Palm Canyon Dr./ Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr./te Alejo Dr. 2.4 III Cahuilla Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Way Ramon Rd. 0.5 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 93 0172 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage I Palm Canyon Wash Gene Autry Trail Landau Blvd. 1.2 III Sunrise Way Sunny Dunes Rd. to Tahquitz Creek La Verne Way to East Palm Canyon Dr. 0.2 Proposed The City of Palm Springs has identified 47 proposed bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California, as well as discussions with local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Palm Springs Top Priority Projects Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost Whitewater Wash 1-10 Fwy. Cathedral City city limit 11.5 $11,500,000 Tahquitz Creek Path Calle Palo Fierro Tahquitz Canyon Visitor Center 0.6 $600,000 Avenida Caballeros San Rafael Rd. Tamarisk Rd. 1.8 $90,000 III Avenida Caballeros Tamarisk Rd. Ramon Rd. 1.2 $24,000 Calle Palo Fierro Sunny Dunes Rd. Riverside Dr. 0.1 $2,000 Camino Real S. Riverside Dr. Calle Palo Fierro 0.2 $10,000 Crossley Rd. Ramon Rd. Ave. 34 1.0 $1,000,000 Crossley Rd. Ramon Rd. Ave. 34 1.1 $50,000 Ave. 34 Crossley Rd. Whitewater Wash 0.5 $500,000 Paseo Dorotea Ramon Rd. Camino Parocela 0.1 $5,000 Tachevah Dr. Indian Canyon Dr. Avenida Caballeros 0.5 $25,000 II East Palm Canyon Dr. South Palm Canyon Dr. Eastern city limit 3.7 $185,000 II Mesquite Ave. Manzanita Ave. to Farrell Dr. El Cielo Rd. to Dinah Shore Dr. 3.5 $175,000 Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 —___._...... CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 94 01 13 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Palm Springs 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos III Racquet Club Rd. North Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr. 1.8 $36,000 II Belardo Rd. Ramon Rd. South Palm Canyon Dr. 1.0 $50,000 It Baristo Rd. Avenida Caballeros El Cielo Rd. 1.5 $75,000 II Gene Autry Trail I-10 Freeway Vista Chino 2.3 $115,00 II Indian Canyon Dr. Ave. 20 San Rafael Dr. 3.2 $160,00 II Vista Chino Gene Autry Trail Eastern city limit 0.7 $35,000 III Vista Chino Indian canyon Dr. Cerritos Dr. 1.3 $26,000 III Mesquite Ave. Farrell Dr. Compadre Rd. 0.2 $4,0 00 III Tamarisk Rd. Avenida Caballeros Farrell Dr. 1.1 $22,000 III palm Canyon Dr. Palm Springs city limit Ramon Rd. 5.0 $100,00 II South Palm Canyon East Palm Canyon Dr. Murray Canyon Dr. 1.5 $75,000 I Murray canyon S. Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon Wash 1.8 $1,800,000 I Palm Canyon Wash S. Palm Canyon Dr. Gene Autry Trail 4.9 $4,900,000 III Alejo Rd. Indian Canyon Dr. Sunrise Way 1.0 $20,00 III Calle El Segundo Alejo Rd. Ramon Rd. 1.0 $20,00 III Dinah Shore Dr. Beginning of bridge over Whitewater River Eastern city limit <0.1 <$2,000 II El Cielo Rd. Ramon Rd. Escoba Dr. 1.0 $50,000 III El Cielo Rd. Tahquitz Way Ramon Rd. 0.5 $10,00 III Farrell Dr. Alejo Rd. Tahquitz Canyon Way 1.5 $30,00 III Tachevah Dr. North Palm Canyon Dr. Farrell Dr. 1.0 $20, 000 III San Rafael Rd. Indian Ave. Sunrise Way 1.0 $20,000 City of Palm Springs 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos I Mission Creek I-10 Fwy. Whitewater Wash 2.4 $2,400,0 OC III Ramon Rd. El Cielo Rd. Eastern city limit 2.0 $40,00 III Sunrise Way Whitewater River Alejo Rd. 2.6 $52,000 II loth Ave. Diablo Rd. Indian Ave. 2.0 $100,00 II Dillon Rd. Diablo Rd. Eastern city limit 1.7 $85,00 II Araby Dr. East Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon Wash 0.4 $20,00 II Barona Rd. East Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Canyon Wash 0.7 $35,00 III Escobar Dr. East Palm Canyon Dr. El Cielo Rd. 0.3 $6,0 III Garnet Ave. Western city limit Eastern city limit 2.9 $58,00 III Hwy. 111 Snow Creek Rd. Palm Springs city limit 2.3 $46,000 III Salvia Rd. I-10 Fwy. Just east of Gene Autry Trail 1.3 $26,000 III San Rafael Rd. North Palm Canyon Dr. Indian Ave. 0.7 $14,00 II Tipton Rd. I-10 Fwy. just west of Whitewater Canyon Rd. Road end just north of Hwy. 111 2.6 $130,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 95 0114 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS The map on page 99 shows existing and proposed bikeways and parking facilities, schools, and attractions, which primarily include shopping centers, government buildings, and other retail districts. Bicycle Parking Existin Palm Springs has identified several locations where bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below. • Sunrise Park Demuth Park Many locations Downtown • Ruth Hardy Park • Sunrise Marketplace Shopping Center • Smoke Tree Village Center Shopping Center City Hall and other City buildings • Desert Hospital • Leisure Center Police Department • Palm Springs Mall • Riverside County Administrative Center • Palm Springs International Airport • Main Branch Library • Amado Park Desert Inn Fashion Plaza Mall • Starbucks Cafe Plaza Parking Lot Department of Motor Vehicles • Lower Tram Station • Office building on the southeast corner of Ramon Road and Paseo Dorotea Proposed The City proposed to add new bicycle parking to the following locations: • The new College of the Desert campus (just southwest of where Indian Ave. crosses the Whitewater River) • Rimrock Shopping Center • Springs Shopping Center CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 96 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS The Plaza at Sunrise Gene Autry Plaza At shopping plaza at northeast corner of Vista Chino and Indian Canyon Palm Springs Convention Center Shopping area along Arenas Road just east of Indian Canyon Dr. The City currently has no requirements or plans for bicycle parking in new buildings. Links to Other Transportation Modes Palm Springs is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. These state-of-the-art bike racks can carry up to two bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. An Amtrak station near Indian Canyon Drive in the northern part of the City currently exists, as does a Greyhound bus station near the downtown area. Bicycle parking is planned at these locations. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position" Facility Type 111 E. Palm Cyn. Dr. Gene Autry Tr. 15 EB FS Bike Rack 24 Tahquitz Cyn. Way Civic Dr. 29 WB FS Bike Rack 14 / 30 Palm Cyn. Dr. Baristo Rd. 128 SB FS Bike Locker 111 24 Tahquitz Cyn. Way Farrell Dr. 182 WB FS Bike Rack 14 Gene Autry Tr. E. Vista Chino 490 SB NS Bike Locker 24 Avenida Vista Chino 496 NB FS Bike Rack Caballeros 24 Vista Chino Avenida 609 EB FS Bike Rack Caballeros 14 Gene Autry Tr. Vista Chino 614 NB FS Bike Locker 111 Palm Cyn. Dr. Gene Autry Tr. 667 WB FS Bike Rack 14 / 30 Baristo Rd. Farrell Dr. 780 WB MB Bike Locker 14 / 24 Baristo Rd. Farrell Rd. 889 EB INS Bike Locker 30 'Position refers to the near side (NIS) or far side (FS) of the Intersection Bicycle Amenities Shower and clothing lockers exist at Sunrise Park. The new College of the Desert Campus will have bicycle amenities. The City currently has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 97 0176 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Palm Springs has not had a bicycle safety education program. However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health and the Palm Springs Unified School District, has won a Federal Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in Palm Springs. The program will likely start in Federal Fiscal Year 2010-2011. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Palm Springs had one project funded with SB-821 funds in 1996. This project was for a Bike Lane and Signage Project for all City bikeways in the amount of $79,000. In the early 1990s Palm Springs received $383,000 from Measure A and SB-821 funds for a bicycle bridge over the Palm Canyon Wash. Future Financial Needs The City of Palm Springshas the following future financial needs: Top Priority Bikeways: 25.8 miles, $14,166,000 2nd Priority Bikeways: 33.4, $7,568,000 3`d Priority Bikeways: 21.9, $3,012,000 Total: 81 miles, $24,746,000 Bicycle Parking Program: $25,000 Total Capital Financial Need: $24,771,000 Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 22.7 miles, $71,914 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 98 0177 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 99 01 l3 w CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS us ®A� CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 100 0179 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS City of Rancho Mirage Bicycle Plan With a year 2009 population of 17,180 (California Department of Finance), Rancho Mirage is made up of primarily resort communities. The City has a grid network of arterial streets that connects to the neighboring cities of Cathedral City and Palm Desert, as well as to surrounding unincorporated areas. The City's main arterial streets include Highway 111, Da Val( and Bob Hope Drives, Monterey Avenue, Ramon Road, and Dinah Shore, Gerald Ford, Frank Sinatra, and Country Club Drives. Most of the City's destinations are located along Highway 111. Land Use The map on page 106 shows the current and future land use patterns in the City of Rancho Mirage. The City consists primarily of low- and very low -density residential and resort uses. Commercial office and retail uses are located along Highway 111. Golf communities are located throughout the City. Bikeways Existing Rancho Mirage currently has several existing bikeways that are listed in the following table. They total 16.6 miles in length. City of Rancho Mirage Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage I Whitewater River Frank Sinatra Dr. Kelly Ln. 0.6 II Country Club Dr. Morningside Dr. Monterey Ave. 2.0 II Morningside Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 1.0 II Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Clancy Ln. 4.7 II Gerald Ford Dr. Los Alamos Rd. Monterey Ave. 2.0 II La Paz Rd. Thompson Rd. Los Reyes Dr. 0.3 11 Los Alamos Rd. Gerald Ford Dr. Sunny Ln. 0.4 II Los Reyes Dr. Sunny Lane La Paz Rd. 0.4 II Monterey Ave. Dinah Shore Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2.1 II Ramon Rd. Western city limit Bob Hope Dr. 1.7 II Sunny Ln. Da Vail Dr. Los Reyes Dr. 1.2 II Thompson Rd. La Paz Rd. Frank Sinatra Dr. 0.2 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 101 01 0180 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Proposed The City has proposed 10 bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed below. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from our local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity of the project. City of Rancho Mirage Top Priority Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost II Frank Sinatra Dr. Hwy. 111 Monterey Ave. 3.4 $170,000 II Bob Hope Dr. Clancy Ln. lHwy. 111 0.8 $40,000 City of Rancho Mirage 2nd Priority Project Estimated Cost Bicycle Parking Program $25,000 City of Rancho Mirage 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos Southern Pacific Northern city limit Eastern city limit 0.7 $700,00 Railroad Northern city limit to Bob Hope Dr. to eastern city 1.4 $1,400,00 I Whitewater River Frank Sinatra Dr. limit II Country Club Dr. Hwy. 111 Morningside Dr. 0.6 $30,00 II Da Val[ Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 1.0 $50,000 II Gerald Ford Dr. Plumely Rd. Los Alamos Rd. 1.5 $75,00 II Dinah Shore Dr. Da Val[ Dr. Monterey Ave. 3.1 $155,00 III Magnesia Falls or Hwy. 111 Park View Dr. 0.8 $16,00 Joshua Rd. The map on page 105 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking and amenities. Bicycle Parking Existing The City of Rancho Mirage has bicycle parking the following locations: City Hall The River shopping center The library CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 102 0181 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Eisenhower Medical Center Albertson's at the SW corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue Whitewater Park Monterey Market Place Pavillion's shopping center at the SW corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Bob Hope Drive At the activity center at the SW corner of Dinah Shore Drive and Monterey Avenue Proposed New bicycle parking will be added by the property owners at the intersection of Dinah Shore Drive and Bob Hope Drive, and at the Casino at the intersection of Ramon Road and Bob Hope Drive. The City also requires bicycle parking by ordinance in new office and commercial developments.One bicycle rack is required for every 40 auto parking spaces. Links to Other Transportation Modes The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the City, or are planned. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations in the City. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position' Facility Type 50 Bob Hope Dr. Hospital 582 NB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Mirage Cove Dr. 643 EB FS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Rancho Las Palmas Dr. 650 EB NS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Rancho Las Palmas Dr. 659 WB NS Bike Rack 111 Hwy. 111 Mirage Cove Dr. 663 WB FS Bike Rack 31 Dinah Shore Dr. Shoppers Ln. 1 939 EB FS Bike Rack 'Position refers to the near Side (NS) or far sioe (FJ) or toe intersection Bicycle Amenities There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The City currently has no requirements for bicycle amenities. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 103 018? CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement Rancho Mirage has a bicycle safety education program for students at one local public school and two private schools. The Sheriffs give these upon on request. They consist of a short verbal instruction portion, followed by bicycle rodeo instruction outdoors on bicycles. The program has been in place for about 12 years. The Rancho Mirage Police Department enforces all traffic laws, for bicycles and motor vehicles as part of their regular duties. They ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic Laws and make the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of enforcement depends on the availability of officers. The Sheriff Department also responds to particular needs and problems as they arise. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities All previous bikeways have been funded by General Funds from the City, or from development impact fees. The City does not keep direct records of these. Future Financial Needs The City of Rancho Miragehas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 4.2 miles, $210,000 • 2nd Priority Bike Parking: $25,000 • 3`d Priority Bikeways: 8.1 miles, $2,426,000 Total: 11.3 miles, $2,636,000 • Total Capital Costs: 12.3 miles of bikeways, bicycle parking, $2,661,000 • Annual Class I Bike Path Maintenance: 2.7 miles, $8,554 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 104 0183 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 105 0184 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS La9dHtl 6mWWf Vlan land vela 10411 Eom«: &aM ' - AmvvtiM Yt3LCmYta ivx•W.tt1YP fn S4W [ar.V pmvart {`l(�µ a-rva iiN:O'W tImSG'i. Cuav,�a+YtW/CtlSY� WbhRWRm4aV �i tWs.VivV Hw0':awvNMyMtOM t. W 9lYSamaH rgmersggrt•p ; tp,MrvMiAd SMmNrt �-" RM'Satmrrl ®ktaTkim4N S�Mew!: uum+�a�'dWuu:4 I CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update xun [Au—" ++MM1�memewti�r. 106 0185 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Unincorporated Riverside County Bicycle Plan For the purposes of this Non -Motorized Transportation Plan, areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys that fall outside existing city boundaries are referred to as unincorporated Riverside County. In the Coachella Valley, this area is bounded by the Little San Bernardino Mountains and Joshua Tree National Park to the north, the Santa Rosa Mountains to the south, Verbenia Avenue to the west, and the hills just east of Indio and Coachella. Some of the main arterials in this area include SR-62, SR-111, and SR-86, Dillon Road, Monroe, Van Buren, Fillmore, and Pierce Streets, Avenues 52, 54, 58, 62, and 66, and Airport Boulevard. According to the CVAG website, the area has a population of 84,478 (2010). The Palo Verde Valleyis bounded by the Main Diversion Dam to the north, the Imperial County line to the south, the Colorado River to the east, and the Palo Verde Mesa to the west. In this area, some of the main arterial streets include SR-78 and US-95, Hobsonway, 41n 6`n 10`n, 14`n, and 181n Avenues, and De Frain, Neighbours, Lovekin, Intake, and Olive Lake Boulevards. Most of the roads in the unincorporated areas are two-lane rural roads with pavement widths that vary between 24 and 28 feet. Some roads have paved shoulders, but most do not. State highways, such as 111, 62, 86, 78, and US-95 tend to have widened shoulders. Land Use The maps on pages 119 and 120 show the current and future land use patterns in the unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. Most of the unincorporated areas have existing agricultural or open space land uses. There are several small urbanized areas that include some commercial, industrial, and residential uses. Some of these small locations are labeled on the map and include Thousand Palms, Bermuda Dunes, Thermal, Mecca, North Shore, Ripley, and Mesa Verde. There is a large area of medium- and low -density residential land uses located in North Palm Springs and Sky Valley. Some commercial uses are located along SR-111 south of Thermal, and industrial uses are located in North Palm Springs, north of Rancho Mirage, and near Thermal. The checkerboard pattern of land use and zoning corresponds with the pattern of Indian reservation land in the western part of the Coachella Valley. Indian land is zoned for low -density residential and the alternating mile squares are zoned for agricultural or open space uses. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 107 0186 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bikeways The County of Riverside currently has one existing bikeway facility. It is: County of Riverside Existing Bikeways Class Street/Path From To Mileage II Palm Dr. Desert Hot Springs 1-10 Fwy. 3.0 city limit Riverside County has proposed 85 bikeway projects included in this Plan. The projects are listed below by priority. County of Riverside Top Priority Projects Coachella Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost Whitewater Canyon to Unincorporated county gap I Whitewater River Palm Springs city limit; between Indio and 35.1 $35,100,000 unincorporated county Coachella; Coachella city gap in Palm Springs limit to the Salton Sea I Salton Sea Trail Whitewater River Cleveland St. 6.3 $6,300,000 SR-62 to Diablo Rd. to II Dillon Rd. Just west of Indian From Grapefruit Blvd. to SR- 31.3 $1,565,000 Avenue to Coachella 86 city limit I-10Fwy. to Snow Creek III SR-111 Rd; gap between Palm Coachella city limit to 20.8 $416,000 Springs city limit in Parkside Dr. northwest II Indian Ave. Palm Spring city limit Desert Hot Springs city limit 1.8 $90,000 II Ramon Rd./ Rancho Mirage city Palm Desert city limit 9.8 $490,000 Washington St. limit II Ave. 52 La Quinta city limit Coachella city limit 0.5 $25,000 III Hwy. 86S Airport Blvd. Imperial County limit 16.6 $332,000 1 1-10 parallel Whitewater River Garnet Ave. 1.0 $1,000,000 I Palm Canyon Wash South Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Springs city limit 0.5 $500,000 I Long Canyon Wash Joshua Tree National Cathedral City city limit 5.2 $5,200,000 Park I Mission Creek Desert Hot Springs city Palm Springs city limit 4.9 $4,900,000 limit I Coachella Canal Coachella city limit Parkside Dr. 16.0 $16,000,000 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 108 0187 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS County of Riverside Top Priority Projects, Coachella Valley (continued) Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost I Southern Pacific Railroad Cathedral City city limit Ramon Rd. 2.8 $2,800,000 I Blind Canyon Mission Creek Desert Hot Springs city limit 0.7 $700,000 II Varner Rd. Da Vail Dr. Indio city limit 11.0 $550,000 II Fred Waring Dr. Clinton St. Indio city limit 0.4 $20,000 II Miles Ave. Clinton St. Indio city limit 0.3 $15,000 Bicycle Parking Program $10,000 Palo Verde Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cost I Colorado River Clark Ranch Rd. to Blythe city limit Blythe city limit to Imperial County line 22.2 $22,200,000 II US-95 north end of Palo Verde Valley Blythe city limit 5.2 $260,000 II Hobsonway, Blackrock Rd. Mesa Dr. Blythe city limit 2.0 $100,000 II Riverside Ave. Arrowhead Blvd. Blythe city limit 1.5 $75,000 County of Riverside 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects Coachella Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos Mid -way between I Monroe and Jackson Ave. 52 Ave. 54 1.2 $1,200,00 Streets Mid -way between I Jackson and Van Buren Ave. 58 Ave. 64 2.0 $2,000,000 Streets I Midway between Polk St. Ave. 60 Ave. 65 3.0 $3,000,000 and Fillmore St. II Ave. 20, Worsley Rd. SR-62 to Diablo Rd. Indian Ave. to MountainView 9.4 5470,00 Rd. 50 Coachella city limit Pierce St. 1.5 $1,500,099Ave. 51 Jackson St. Just west of Van Buren 0.8 $40,OOCAve. LIAve. 58 Monroe St. to Fillmore St. to 4.9 $245,00 Harrison St. Buchannan St. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 109 0188 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS County of Riverside 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects (Continued) Coachella Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos 1 Ave. 58 SR-86 Buchanan St. 1.6 $1,600,000 II Ave. 60 La Quinta city limit Lincoln St. 8.6 $430,00 1 Ave. 60 Polk St. to Whitewater River Pierce St. to Lincoln St. 3.1 $3,100,000 II Ave. 61 Whitewater River Coachella Canal 4.1 $205,00 1 Ave. 61 Lincoln St. Coachella Canal 1.5 $1,500,00 I Ave. 63 Harrison St. Fillmore St. 3.0 $3,000,00 II Ave. 63 Harrison St. Fillmore St. 3.0 $150,00 11 Ave. 64 Monroe St. to Van Buren St. Pierce St. to Coachella Canal 11.7 $585,00 I Ave. 64 Harrison St. Pierce St. and to Ave. 66 5.5 $5,500,00 II Ave. 65 Polk St. to Pierce St. Lincoln St. to Johnson St. 3.0 $150,00 Ave. 65 Polk St. Pierce St. 2.0 $2,000,00 11 Ave. 66, Box Canyon Rd. Jackson St. Just east of Coachella Canal Rd. 13.2 $660,00 I Ave. 66 East of Tyler St. to Polk St Whitewater River to Lincoln St. and to just east of Coachella Canal Rd. 8.6 $8,600,ODC 11 Ave. 68 Polk St. to Fillmore St. Buchannan St. to Arthur St. 7.0 $700,00 II Ave. 69 Fillmore St. Pierce St. 1.0 $50,00 II Ave. 70 Harrison St. to Cleveland St. Vander Veer Rd. to Coachella Canal 13.1 $655,00 I Ave. 70 Arthur St. Cleveland St. 1.0 $1,000,0 II Ave. 74 Fillmore St. Pierce St. 1.0 $50,00 II Ave. 81 Johnson St. Pierce St. 3.0 $150,00 II Ave. 82 Ave. 81 Johnson St. 2.0 $100,00 II Ave. 84 SR-86S Johnson St. 0.8 $40,00 II Cleveland St. SR-111 Salton Sea north shore 0.6 $30,00 It Railroad Ave. Cabazon Haugen Lehman Way 3.9 $195,00 II Tipton Rd., Whitewater Cutoff SR-111 1-10/SR-62 connector 1.1 $55,00 It Wall Rd., Garnet Ave. West end of Garnet Ave. Ave. 20 1.1 $55,00 II Fillmore St. Airport Blvd. to Ave. 58 SR- 111 to Ave. 74 9.9 $495,00 I Fillmore St. Ave. 62 to Ave. 64 Ave. 65 to Ave.66 1.5 - $1,500,0 11 1000 Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 4.7 $235,00 11 Clinton St. Fred Waring Dr. Indio City limit 0.1 $5,0CJ II Desert Cactus Dr. Airport Blvd. Ave. 58 0.7 $35,00 III lHarrison St. Ave.54 lAve. 86 18.2 $364,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 110 01619 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS County of Riverside 2nd Priority Bikeway Projects (Continued) Coachella Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Jackson St. Ave. 52 to Ave. 60 Ave. 64 to Ave. 66 5.0 S250,0013 II Johnson St. Ave. 62 to Salton Sea Trail Ave. 81 to Ave. 84 6.1 S305,00 II Lincoln St. Ave. 60 Whitewater River 4.9 $245,00 I Lincoln St. Ave. 60 Salton Sea Trail 5.0 $5,000,00 II Little Morongo Rd. Desert Hot Springs city limit Ave. 20 1.7 $85,00 II Long Canyon Rd. Desert Hot Springs city limit Dillon Rd. 1.5 $75,00 II Monroe St. Ave. 62 Ave. 64 1.0 $50,00 III Mountain View Rd. Desert Hot Springs city limit Dillon Rd. 0.2 $4,00 II Pierce St. Ave. 52 to Ave. 60 Ave. 66 to Harrison St. 11.9 $595,00 1 Pierce St. Ave. 52 to Ave. 60 Ave. 62 to Ave. 64 5.0 $5,000,OOC 1 Ave. 58/Ave. 61 diagonal path Ave. 58/Hwy. 86 Ave. 60/Ave. 65 diagonal path 2.5 $2,500,OOC I Ave. 60/Ave. 65 diagonal path Ave. 60 Ave. 63 2.5 $2,500,OOC II Airport Blvd. Monroe St. Buchanan St. 7.8 $390,00 1 Connector between 1- 10 and Hwy. 62 1-10 Fwy.. Hwy. 62 2.4 $2,400,000 I SR-86 parallel Dillon Rd. Ave. 86 10.9 $10,900,000 III Hwy. 62 Dillon Rd. to Desert Hot Springs city Limit Desert Hot Springs city limit to 2.7 miles north of Desert Hot Springs city limit 5 2 $104,00 Palo Verde Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos I Ave. 6 Blythe city limit C&D Blvd. 2.0 $2,000,0 11 Ave. 6 1 mile east of De Frain Blvd. Olive Lake Blvd. 3.5 $175,00 11 Ave. 10 Neighbours Blvd. Blythe city limit 1.8 $90,00 II Ave. 14 Neighbours Blvd. Just west of Lovekin Blvd. 2.9 $145,00 II Ave. 18 SR-78 Intake Blvd. 5.0 $250,00 II Intake Blvd. Seeley Ave. Ave. 18 1.0 S50,00 1 AZ & CA Railroad Northwest end of Palo Verde Valley Blythe city limit at Ave. 8 20.5 $20,500,00( 1 Main Canal Ave. 8 Colorado River 10.1 $10,100,00 11 C&D Blvd. Ave. 6 to Ave. 10 Blythe city limit to Ave. 18 3.8 $190,00 I Canal Path Neighbours Blvd. Blythe city limit 1.0 $1,000,0 II LovekBlvd. Ave. 4 to Blythe city limit Blythe city limit to Ave. 18 18 3.8 $190,00 II Hwy.78 1-10 1Ave. 18 1 2.8 $140,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update ill 01 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS County of Riverside 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Coachella Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos It Mountain View Rd. Dillon Rd. Cathedral City city limit 2.5 $125,00 II Ave. 54 Monroe St. Van Buren St. 2.0 $100,00 1 Ave. 54 Harrison St. to Tyler St. And Coachella city limit to Grapefruit Blvd. 1.3 $1,300,00 I Tyler St. Ave. 54 Airport Blvd. 1.0 $1,000,0oc 11 Tyler St. Ave. 54 Airport Blvd. 1.0 $50,00 I Tyler St. Ave. 64 Ave. 65 0.5 $500,00 11 Tyler St. Ave.60 Ave. 66 3.0 $150,00 II Ave. 62 Monroe St. Coachella Canal 11.0 $11,000,000 1 Ave. 62 Monroe St. Coachella Canal 11.0 $550,00 11 Hammond Rd. Lincoln St. Ave. 70 3.9 $195,00 11 Van Buren St. Coachella city limit Ave. 66 5.7 $285,00 II Buchanan St. Airport Blvd. Ave. 62 3.0 $150,00 1 Buchanan St. Airport Blvd. Ave. 60 2.0 $2,000,000 II Grant St. Ave. 62 Hammond Rd. 3.5 $175,00 1 Grant St. Ave. 62 Hammond Rd. 3.5 $3,500,000 11 Grant St. SR-111 Salton Sea Trail 1.7 $85,00 I Grant St. SR-111 Salton Sea Trail 1.7 $1,700,00 11 Hayes St. Ave. 64 Ave. 70 3.0 $150,00 11 Hayes St. SR-111 Salton Sea Trail 0.8 $40,00 I Polk St. Ave. 62 Ave. 66 2.0 $2,000,00 II Polk St. Airport Blvd. Ave. 70 7.0 $350,00 1 Dale Killer Rd. Ave. 64 Ave. 66 1.0 $1,000,0 II Dale Killer Rd. Ave. 64 Ave. 66 1.0 $50,00 11 Garfield St. Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail 3.5 $175,00 1 Arthur St. Ave. 66 Ave. 70 1.8 $1,800,000 II Arthur St. Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail 2.7 $135,00 1 Lincoln St. Ave. 66 Ave. 68 1.0 $1,000,00 II Lincoln St. Ave. 66 Ave. 68 1.0 $50,00 11 Ave. 68 Hayes St. Arthur St. 2.0 $100,00 11 Ave. 70 Lincoln St. Cleveland St. 6.0 $300,00 I Ave. 70 Arthur St. Cleveland St. 1.0 $1,000,0 I Cleveland St. Ave. 70 Salton Sea Trail 0.5 $500,00 11 Cleveland St. Ave. 70 SR-111 0.5 $25,00 II Vander Veer Rd. Coachella Canal SR-111 1.8 $90,00 II Parkside Dr. Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail 2.5 $125,00 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 112 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS County of Riverside 3rd Priority Bikeway Projects Palo Verde Valley Class Street/Path From To Length (mi.) Estimated Cos II Ave. 4 Blythe city limit US-95 2.5 $125,00 II Ave. 8 Blythe city limit Olive Lake Blvd. 2.1 - $105,00 II Seeley Ave. SR-78 Intake Blvd. 5.0 $250,00 II Arrowhead Blvd. Ave. 10 to Riverside Ave. I-10 Fwy. to Ave. 18 3.3 $165,00 II De Frain Blvd. Blythe city limit Ave. 18 2.3 $115,00 The maps on pages 116, 117, and 118 show existing and proposed bikeways and parking facilities. Most of the projects are proposed on rural two-lane roads with pavement widths of 24-28 feet. There are three primary options for improving these roads and upgrading them to accommodate bicycle lanes or establishing Class III routes. These options for rural roads are listed below. Designate the routes as Class III facilities with signage and provide safety signage advising motorists to the presence of bicyclists on the road. Accelerated maintenance schedules could also be implemented along these routes. Widen the roadway to 36-40 feet to include either wide shoulders for a Class III bikeway or to install Class II bike lanes. When the surrounding areas is developed, incorporate bike lanes or wide shoulders for a Class III facility into the design of the roadway so that the road is widened to a sufficient width to accommodate a bicycle facility. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 113 92 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Bicycle Parking Existin The County of Riverside has no existing bicycle parking facilities that have been identified. Proposed The County of Riverside proposes bicycle parking facilities at all parks, schools, high - density residential areas, and at all public buildings. Links to Other Transportation Modes The unincorporated areas of the County in the Coachella Valley are served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine racks hold two bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No public transit operator currently provides transit services in the Palo Verde Valley. No transit stations or park -and -ride facilities currently exist in the unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at selected bus stop locations unincorporated portions of the CVAG region. These are presented in the following table. Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility Type 32 Ramon Rd. Shelter Dr. 427 WB FS Bike Rack 32 Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 429 EB FS Bike Rack 91 Lincoln St. Gardenia Ct. 867 NB NS Bike Rack 91 Duros Mobile Home Park Pierce St. 967 NB FS Bike Rack 91 Lincoln St. 63rd Ave. 979 NB FS Bike Rack *Position refers to the near side (NS) or tar side (FS) of the intersection Bicycle Amenities There are currently no bicycle commuter related showers or clothing lockers. The Countycurrently has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings. Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement The Countycurrently has no safety education program at this time. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 114 0193 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities Only one Class II bicycle facility exists in the unincorporated parts of Riverside County and is located in the Coachella Valley along Palm Drive between the Desert Hot Springs city limit and the 1-10 Freeway. There are no records as to how this was funded. Future Financial Needs The County of Riversidehas the following future financial needs: • Top Priority Bikeways: 195.9 miles, $98,638,000 • 2"d Priority Bikeways: 294.2, $106,882,000 • 3`d Priority Bikeways: 112.6miles, $32,285,000 • Total: 602.7 miles, $142,671,000 • Bicycle Parking Program - Coachella Valley: $10,000 • Total Capital Financial Need: $237,775,000 • Annual Class Bike Path Maintenance: 220.4 miles, $698,227 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 115 0194 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS Lu •i q j S ii _ w i �u 0+� x"7 assrrn z 1� i � IXIANi1 RYM CL ! 'w ia. `' •• 1 > TR ix t uJ i a ww) pi -�1 i ;;ems 11. Cca U. IF W tops a. Q i aHlwJ.N3 r J' �i 8v�i �a w sviiv^nevY F+' &�TL3UY81 1Ri Ht1APo{{A +L t < i t6 �... Litl.'n�A ATo't3f1MNt@16 j�j m willI �' w a r j zz i a v ay2u 2 0IT 4q�nlAM g ' vtl'ryt4roas �__ • x g,i � vx oa awlmx-a1. flrF*' �rcauir '' 3 i' >! 'h [Arxly lot rvKM� .}.§r7vAvlc'r I; TiotiY�Eur ,v-- Y1�FW3AA<` I - ; i i❑� t'Finai;xr phi ii �iarrr$' '{il {!"1 AT �v an " i T' 1 i 2 � J }R1+'ua+vs K �"3M }:1LE5'r'"��jtnij `TOki r 'N�.11 6^ ° ��W ++s++✓�rrnus IF j 1 iF] ...»lP+juy{, � III im aAswsr«�S sid ., i Y .y5t ,• f]L 4GLLWJE9ty lixa 4 �" � s i = 4, AGO U13 m'mr ry Fr�#� ts'avt } CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 116 0195 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 117 0196 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES UNINCORPORATED COUNTY PALO VERDE VALLEY f trxn a y 2 u xa� 4d i Yj £9?NN �y t'.tY.iSt° iFtVER � t 1 �:... .. i g.'. Y3lH AVE 4 'S _,2UiN6LE �.j 16i HAUL ""-ti'> _ iAYNN11 sr�rnurt' a a: kYAAbE � o wxr. 6tr+;r�s ycM 2 �� arntx i` 2 + �,� aisrx5+e CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update a o� xs s jjN ekyel fuFisfq ttiCyeL PoRlnp ctAsa xiarva �-�.an>,e u (y��iitpi PaiC�, �£>ugP>W, w i_ar:. Pa. m.-a itmaP Wc}<M Pa51n9 r.r u.. sevL®. ee.x �.'.w'-wuctssar — LM1�i iFa'Nktms.Prymd �xuKw.0.>Y m..r L1a>hbapM IbAa Cx=n/ ,��a nv�enuaw«wne°v> tIK,YNMnasSai �GM�y#wtiu. [}>UN6141� 118 0197 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 119 0198 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS L.g"d c ... vwx ., .w;u✓:wr�w«.xtss � 4••�•.vnaro.. k�� vim.. M m6wA P'r.MY ksS N+.aeBY uPrutw 1[6Gif- •4 E .' Rrx t6u-^aw .. tm tia*m+'4'aer iP+ry xewa ASP �`., favfr muYa . li4Y ' fn.wrtn � t rvT3avi.ar wF x �..•wrsrvty� i:_. W+o hnax:mr I n aex ( �As^Rx..4vww smx+t CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 120 01.99 CHAPTER 5 FUNDING SOURCES Funding for Bicycle Projects A variety of potential funding sources, including local, state, regional, and federal funding programs, may be used to construct the proposed bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Most of the Federal and State programs are competitive, and involve the completion of extensive applications with clear documentation of the project need, costs, and benefits. Local funding for projects can come from sources within jurisdictions that compete only with other projects in each jurisdiction's budget. A detailed program -by -program of available funding programs along with the latest relevant information follows. Federal Funding Programs SAFETEA-LU The Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) sets the framework for spending federal transportation revenue. SAFETEA-LU expires with the federal fiscal year in 2009, and Congress will adopt successor legislation with new funding programs and guidelines. Many of the programs described in this section may remain. Federal funding through SAFETEA-LU will likely provide some of outside funding for Coachella Valley region projects. SAFETEA-LU currently contains three major programs that fund bikeway and/or trail projects; Surface Transportation Program (STP), Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA), and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) along with other programs such as the National Recreational Trails Fund, Section 402 (Safety) funds, Scenic Byways funds, and Federal Lands Highway funds. SAFETEA-LU funding is administered through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). An annual Call -for -Projects competitive allocation process determines project funding. A local match by local jurisdictions is often required for receipt of funds. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 121 02�0 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES Safe Routes to School(SRTS As of 2006, a new federal Safe Routes to School program offers grants to local agencies and others for facilities and programs. Bikeways, sidewalks, intersection improvements, traffic calming and other projects that enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety to elementary and middle schools are eligible. Safety education, enforcement and promotional programs are also eligible. Caltrans administers this grant and releases the funds in multi -year cycles. Approximately $46-million wasspent statewidein 2008 SRTS-funded projects. The funds are distributed to each Caltrans district according to school enrollment. District 8 (Riverside and San Bernardino Counties) received approximately $6.5 million. Local jurisdictions, school districts and other agencies compete for these funds. This program will have to be reauthorized with the upcoming federal transportation bill. The appropriate contact person for this program is Carol Green at (909) 383-6322 and carol—green@dot.ca.gov. State Funding Programs Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 (SB 821) TDA Article 3 funds —also known as the Local Transportation Fund (LTF)—are used by cities within Riverside County for the planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is responsible for administering this program and establishing its policies. These funds are allocated annually on a competitive basis to both cities and the County of Riverside. Local agencies apply to RCTC for these funds.ln 2009 over $1 million were distributed by RCTC. TDA Article 3 funds may be used for the following activities related to the planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities: • Engineering expenses leading to construction. • Right-of-way acquisition. • Construction and reconstruction. • Retrofitting existing bicycle facilities to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Route improvements such as signal controls for cyclists, bicycle loop detectors, rubberized rail crossings and bicycle -friendly drainage grates. • Purchase and installation of bicycle facilities, such as improved intersections, secure bicycle parking, benches, drinking fountains, changing rooms, rest rooms CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 122 •4. 0201 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES and showers adjacent to bicycle trails, employment centers, park -and -ride lots, and/or transit terminals accessible to the general public. The appropriate contact person for this program is MarthaDurbin at (951) 787-7141 and mdurbin@rctc.org at RCTC. Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) The State Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) is an annual statewide discretionary program that is available through the Caltrans Bicycle Facilities Unit for funding bicycle projects. Available as grants to local jurisdictions, the BTA emphasizes projects that benefit bicycling for commuting purposes. Agencies may apply for these funds through the Caltrans Office of Bicycle Facilities. Applicant cities and counties are required to have an approved bicycle plan that conforms to Streets and Highways Code 891.2 to qualify and compete for funding on a project -by -project basis. The cities within the CVAG region and Riverside County may apply for these funds through the Caltrans Office of Bicycle Facilities. A local match of 10 percent is required for all awarded funds. Every year $7.2-million is allocated for bicycle projects statewide. Of this amount, $315,000 was allocated to the City of Cathedral City for the design and construction of a Class I bikeway along the eastside of the Whitewater Channel from Vista Chino Drive to 30th Avenue, and a Class II bikeway on 30th Avenue from the terminus of the Class I bikeway along the Whitewater Channel to Landau Boulevard. The appropriate contact person for this program isKen McGuire at (916) 653-2750 and ken. mcguire@dot.ca.gov. Safe Routes to School(SR2S) The Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program uses allocated funds from the Hazard Elimination Safety (HES) program of SAFETEA-LU. This program, initiated in 2000, is meant to improve school commute routes by improving safety to bicycle and pedestrian travel through bikeways, sidewalks, intersection improvements, traffic calming and ongoing programs. This program funds improvements for elementary, middle and high schools. A local match of 10 percent is required for this competitive program, which allocates over $20-million annually, or $40 million to $45 million in two-year cycles. Each year the state legislature decides whether to allocate funds to the program or not. The appropriate contact person for this program is Carol Green at (909) 383-6322 and carol_green@dot.ca.gov. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 123 021012 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES Office of Traffic Safetv (OTS The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) seeks to reduce motor vehicle fatalities and injuries through a national highway safety program. Priority areas include police traffic services, alcohol and other drugs, occupant protection, pedestrian and bicycle safety, emergency medical services, traffic records, roadway safety and community -based organizations. The OTS provides grants for one to two years. The California Vehicle Code (Sections 2908 and 2909) authorizes the apportionment of federal highway safety funds to the OTS program. Bicycle safety programs are eligible programs for OTS start-up funds.City agencies are eligible to apply. The appropriate contact person for this program is Kevin Yokoi at (916) 509-3024 and kyokoi@ots.ca.gov. Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEMP) EEM Program funds are allocated to projects that offset environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities including streets, mass transit guideways, park-n-ride facilities, transit stations, tree planting to mitigate the effects of vehicular emissions, off -road trails, and the acquisition or development of roadside recreational facilities. The State Resources Agency administers the funds. The appropriate contact for this program is Laurie Heller at (916) 651-7593 and Laurie.heller@resources.ca.gov. AB 2766 AB 2766 Clean Air Funds are generated by a surcharge on automobile registration. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) allocates 40 percent of these funds to cities according to their proportion of the South Coasts population for projects that improve air quality. The projects are up to the discretion of the city and may be used for bicycle projects that could encourage people to bicycle in lieu of driving. The other 60 percent is allocated through a competitive grant program that has specific guidelines for projects that improve air quality. The guidelines vary and funds are often eligible for a variety of bicycle projects. In fiscal year 2007-2008 local jurisdictions received the following amounts from the AQMD. • Cathedral City - $62,244 • Coachella-$45,966 • Desert Hot Springs - $28,120 • Indian Wells - $5,903 • Indio - $92,140 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 124 ...1. 0203 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES • La Quinta - $49,079 • Palm Desert - $59,422 • Palm Springs - $55,965 • Rancho Mirage - $20,237 • Unincorporated Riverside County - $642,912 Local Funding Measure A In 1998 voters approved Measure A, Riverside County's half -cent sales tax for transportation. Funds are allocated to each of three districts: Western Riverside County, the Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde, in proportion to what they contribute. In 2002, Measure A was extended by Riverside County voters to fund transportation improvements through 2039. In addition to major highway projects, over a half -billion dollars has improved local streets and roads in Riverside County. Between 1990 and 2006 cities and unincorporated county areas in the Coachella Valleyreceived $119.6 million and cities and unincorporated county areas in the Palo Verde district received $14.2 million.Thirty-five percent of Measure A funds are distributed to cities with the remainder being administered by CVAG. Non -motorized transportation projects are not included in a specific category of funding under Measure A. Individual projects can be included by each city under the Local Streets and Roads program's allocation of funds. Local Streets and Roads funds are remitted to the local jurisdictions on a monthly basis. In order for individual projects to receive these funds, cities must provide an annual Maintenance of Effort certification and five-year capital improvement plan/program (CIP) that lists projects that will be funded under Measure A. Projects not included in the 5-year CIP would not be eligible for Measure A funding. Approximately $180-million of Measure A funding is available annually countywide, which may or may not include those for on -street bicycle facilities. Oftentimes, bicycle lane (Class II) projects are included as part of larger roadway projects and would not be called out specifically as a bicycle project. The Riverside County Transportation Commission administers Measure A funds. The appropriate contact person for this program is Shirley Medina at smedina@rctc.org. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 125 0204 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES As part of Measure A, an innovative Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee or TUMF was created. Under the TUMF, developers of residential, industrial, and commercial property pay a development fee to fund transportation projects that will be required as a result of the growth the projects create. CVAG administers the TUMF. The TUMF program does not have a specific category set aside for non -motorized transportation projects, although local jurisdictions may use these funds to implement such projects. Eligible projects must be included in the city's Circulation Element of its General Plan. Approximately $100-million of Measure A funding are available annually countywide, which may or may not include those for on -street bicycle facilities. Oftentimes, bicycle lane (Class II) projects are included as part of larger roadway projects and would not be called out specifically as a bicycle project. The appropriate contact person for this program is Allyn Waggle at CVAG at awaggle@cvag.org. Redevelopment Agency Funds Redevelopment Agency funds are tax increments derived from taxes on property within redevelopment areas. They must be spent on improvements in the designated redevelopment area. New Construction Future road widening and construction projects are one means of providing bike lanes. To ensure that roadway construction projects provide bike lanes where needed, it is important that an effective review process is in place to ensure that new roads meet the standards and guidelines presented in this master plan. Developers may also be required to dedicate land toward the widening of roadways in order to provide for enhanced bicycle mobility. Impact Fees and Developer Mitigation Impact fees may be assessed on new development to pay for transportation projects, typically tied to vehicle trip generation rates and traffic impacts generated by a proposed project. A developer may reduce the number of trips (and hence impacts and cost) by paying for on- or off -site bikeway improvements that will encourage residents to bicycle rather than drive. In -lieu parking fees may also be used to contribute to the construction of new or improved bicycle parking facilities. Establishing a clear nexus or connection between the impact fee and the project's impacts is critical in avoiding a potential lawsuit. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 126 0205 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES Benefit Assessment Districts Bike paths, lanes, parking, and related facilities can be funded as part of a local benefit assessment district. However, defining the boundaries of the benefit district may be difficult since the bikeways will have citywide benefit. Business Improvement Districts Bicycle improvements can often be included as part of larger efforts of business improvement and retail district beautification. Similar to benefit assessments, Business Improvement Districts (BIDS) collect levies on businesses in order to fund area -wide improvements that benefit businesses and improve access for customers. These districts may include provisions for bicycle improvements such as bicycle parking or shower and clothing locker amenities. Parking Meter Revenues Cities can fund various improvements through parking meter revenues. The ordinance that governs the use of the revenues would specify eligible uses. Cities have the option to pass ordinances that specify bicycle facilities as eligible expenditures. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 127 . 0206 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES Trail Funding Federal Funding Programs Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCD Act) (amended in 1981) provides states with funding to units of general local government that carry out development activities in areas of economic need. Annually each State develops funding priorities and criteria for selecting projects. HUD's role under the State CDBG program is to ensure State compliance with Federal laws, regulations and policies. Eligible activities include construction or reconstruction neighborhood centers and recreation facilities. The Department of Urban Housing and Development administers the program. The appropriate contact person for this program is Loreta Monzon at (714) 796-5577 and toreta.p.monzon@hud.gov. National Park Service Rivers. Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program (RTCA) The RTCA program provides technical assistance to its project partners, which may include a state or local agency, tribe, non-profit organization, or citizens' group. Rivers and Trails staff help with building partnerships to achieve community -defined goals, assessing resources, developing concept plans, engaging public participation, and identifying potential sources of funding for conservation and outdoor recreation projects, including greenways and trails. The program does not give grants or loans, but providesstaff with extensive experience in community -based conservation to work with local organizations and agencies to develop projects. The appropriate contact people for this program at the National Park Service are Jim Donovan at (323) 441-2117 and jim_donovan@nps.gov and Anne Dove at (323) 441- 9307 and anne_dove@nps.gov. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 128 0207 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES State Funding Programs Proposition 84 - Statewide Park Program The Statewide Park Act will award grants on a competitive basis to the most critically underserved communities across California for the creation of new parks and new recreational facilities. The creation of new parks in neighborhoods where none currently exist will be given priority. These new parks will meet the recreational, cultural, social, educational, and environmental needs of families, youth, senior citizens, and other population groups. Cities, counties, districts with a park and recreation director, joint power authorities, or nonprofit organizations are eligible to apply for these funds. The appropriate contact person for this program is Sherri Mediati at (916) 651-1218 and smediati@parks.ca.gov. She is with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. State Urban Parks and Healthv Communities Eligible applicants: Urbanized or heavily urbanized local agencies or community based organizations within these jurisdictions. "Urbanized or heavily urbanized local agencies" include cities, counties, or a city and county, or special districts as determined by the Department of Finance according to the latest verifiable census data pursuant to subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 5621 of the Public Resources Code (PRC). Eligible projects: Acquisition and / or development of properties for active recreational purposes. "Active recreational purpose" means an activity that requires athletic fields, courts, gymnasiums, or other recreational venues for youth soccer, baseball, football, basketball, tennis, or swimming, or any activity the department identifies as meeting this definition. "Acquisitions only" projects must already contain developed facilities / venues that can be used for active recreational purposes. The appropriate contact person for this program is Sherri Mediati at (916) 651-1218 and smediati@parks.ca.gov. She is with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 129 1 1: CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES Per Capita Grant Program The Per Capita Grant Program is intended to maintain a high quality of life for California's growing population by providing a continuing investment in parks and recreational facilities. Specifically it is for the acquisition and development of neighborhood, community, and regional parks and recreation lands and facilities in urban and rural areas. Eligible projects include acquisition, development, improvement, rehabilitation, restoration, enhancement, and the development of interpretive facilities for local parks and recreational lands and facilities. Per Capita grant funds can only be used for capital outlay. The appropriate contact person for this program is Sherri Mediati at (916) 651-1218 and smediati@parks.ca.gov. She is with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Roberti -Z'Berg-Harris (RZH) Grant Program - Proposition 40 Funds for this grant program are to be allocated for projects pursuant to the Roberti- Tberg-Harris Urban Open Space and Recreational Grant Program and are to be used for: • High priority projects that satisfy the most urgent park and recreation needs, with emphasis on unmet needs in the most heavily populated and most economically disadvantaged areas within each jurisdiction. • Projects for which funding supplements --rather than supplants --local expenditures for park and recreation facilities and does not diminish a local jurisdiction's efforts to provide park and recreation services. Block grants allocated on the basis of population and location in urbanized areas. • Need -basis grants to be awarded competitively to eligible entities in urbanized areas and in non -urbanized areas. Eligible projects include: • Acquisition of park and recreation lands and facilities • Development/rehabilitation of park and recreation lands and facilities • Special Major Maintenance of park and recreation lands and facilities • Innovative Recreation Programs CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 130 CHAPTER 5: FUNDING SOURCES The appropriate contact person for this program is Sherri Mediati at (916) 651-1218 and smediati@parks.ca.gov. She is with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Land and Water Conservation Fund States receive individual allocations of LWCF grant funds based upon a national formula, with state population being the most influential factor. States initiate a statewide competition for the amount available annually. Applications are received by the State up to its specified deadline date. Then, they are scored and ranked according to the project selection criteria so that only the top -ranked projects (up to the total amount available that year) are chosen for funding. Chosen applications are then forwarded to the National Park Service for formal approval and obligation of federal grant monies. Interested applicants should call or write the California Department of Parks and Recreation to request application information.The appropriate contact person for this program is Sherri Mediati at (916) 651-1218 and smediati@parks.ca.gov. She is with the California Department of Parks and Recreation. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 131 0f iI CHAPTER6 PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Funding Phases Chapter 3 identified the bicycle projects planned by each local jurisdiction in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The steps that need to be followed by each jurisdiction to reach implementation through grant funding are: 1. Formally adopt this Plan 2. Identify the projects from the priority project lists to apply for funds to construct 3. Follow through with design and construction when funds are awarded 4. Identify the next priority round of projects and repeat the process The projects in Chapter 4 have been categorized into three priority groups with the first group being the highest priority - those that should be funded in the first phase. These priorities were set to according to completion of a regional network. Second, these priorities were based largelyon comments of the cities and the County. In cases where the local jurisdictions did not express a priority, the Consultant prioritized them by considering the following criteria: • Preferences expressed by local cyclists at the public workshops, at the stakeholder meetings, and through personal contact • Priorities established in the March 2008 survey Destinations served such as city centers, colleges, schools, parks, transit centers, etc. • Employment density • Population density • Connectivity and completion of a network • Improvement of program that serves an immediate safety need • Current availability and/or suitability of right-of-way • Likelihood of attracting large numbers of users • Connectivity with the regional bikeway system Links to other transportation modes • Cost and likely cost effectiveness CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 132 0211 CHAPTER 6: PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Cost Estimates This Plan uses planning level cost estimates. These reflect typical costs of different types of bicycle facilities as experienced in cities around California as well as in the Coachella Valley. As local jurisdictions move forward to fund and implement projects they will need to examine the particulars of each project and produce more specific cost estimates. Costs can vary significantly. The cost to construct Class I bike paths vary on factors such as: Existing grading and need for new grading Existing pavement Whether they will be lighted or not Crossing treatments Fencing, etc. The costs typically range from $500,000 to $2 million per mile. For the purposes of this Plan, $1 million per mile will be used. The costs to construct Class II bike lanes vary based on: The need to sandblast and restripe the whole street or not If one or two stripes will be used The frequency of stencils and signs If widening is needed or not, etc. Class II costs typically range from $10,000 to $100,000 per mile. For the purposes of this Plan, $50,000 per mile will be used. Class III bike routes usually simply consist of signs. Bike route signs generally cost about $250 installed. Sharrow stencils can be used and increase the cost significantly, but will be used only on streets with on -street parking. The cost of Class III bike routes depend primarily on: Whether sharrows will be used or not How many signs are posted Whether destination signs are posted along with bike route signs Class III bike route costs generally range from $5,000 to $30,000 per mile. For this Plan, $20,000 per mile will be used. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 133 0212 CHAPTER 6: PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The cost of bike racks varies significantly depending on the type of rack. Good inverted-U racks generally cost about $250 each installed. Bicycle lockers also vary on the type. Sturdy lockers cost close to $2,000 each installed. The cost to maintain bike paths varies according to the landscaping and irrigation needs. The County of Riverside Regional Park and Open Space District typically incurs a cost of five cents per square foot per mile per year for sweeping and pavement maintenance. Bike paths with lots of landscape and irrigation can cost up to 30 cents per mile per square foot per year. For the purposes of this study, we will assume that bike paths are built with 12 feet of pavement and we will use the basic cost of five cents per square foot per year. This will be 60 cents per linear foot, or $3,168 per mile. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 134 0213 CHAPTER 6: PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Funding Sources Chapter 5 describes in detail each funding source that can be tapped for bicycle funds. Each local jurisdiction will enhance its chances of obtaining these funds by becoming familiar with each funding source, the guidelines, typical grant size, grant cycle, etc. It will also help for local jurisdictions to establish contact with the person at each agency that manages each source to learn of their preferences, etc. Table 3 below synthesizes the funding sources into a matrix with pertinent information. TABLE 3: BICYCLE FUNDING SOURCES SAFETEA-LU Yes Yes Yes Cattrans/ RCTC N/A Safe Routes to School $46 million statewide in (SRTS) Yes Yes Caltrans 2008 (multi -year cycle) TDA Article 3 (SB 821) Yes RCTC / Local $1,367,095 statewide Bicycle Transportation Account(BTA) Yes Yes Cattrans $7.2-million statewide Safe Routes to Yes Yes Caltrans $40-45 -million statewide School (SR2S) in two year cycles Office of Traffic Safet Office of Traffic (OTS) Funds Yes Safety (OTS) N/A Environmental Enhancement and State Resources Mitigation Program Yes Yes Agency / $10-million statewide (EEMP) Cattrans AB 2766 Yes SCAQMD See info on each local jurisdiction in Chapter 4 Measure A Yes RCTC $180-million countywide' Transportation Unifor Yes Yes RCTC / CVAG $100-million countywide' Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Notes: Caltrans is the California State Department of Transportation RCTC is the Riverside County Transportation Commission SCAQMD is the South Coast Air Quality Management District There is no specific category of local funding for non -motorized transportation projects CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 135 -ir 0 ? 14 CHAPTER 6: PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Other Implementation Mechanisms Bicycle projects can be implemented by means other than identifying funding. Indeed, many of the bikeway projects in the Coachella Valley have been installed by other mechanisms as described below. • Installing bicycle lanes along with street repainting or resurfacing Local jurisdictions regularly repaint and resurface their streets. By painting bike lanes simultaneously the marginal cost of the lanes over the remainder of the vehicle lanes is minimal. This makes efficient use of the striping equipment on the street. Some cities restripe as often as every two years. Using this method, all of the planned bike lanes in a city could be constructed in two years without outside funding needed. Installing Class II and Class III bikeways along with street widening and construction of new streets Local jurisdictions can cost-effectively add Class II and Class III bikeways as new streets are constructed or as streets are widened. This also allows these bikeways to go in with little marginal cost. A significant portion of the bike lane miles in this Plan will likely be constructed this way. This is especially true in developing parts of the Coachella Valley between Coachella and the Salton Sea. Identify opportunities to implement projects along with new development Just as streets are added with new development, treating bikeways the same will trigger their construction at the same time. It will be important for the local jurisdictions to follow the Plan and require the bikeways (Classes I, II and III) to be built as new neighborhoods develop. These three options give the Bicycle Master Plan significant added value. After local jurisdictions adopt the Plan they can seek these opportunities to complete the identified bikeways. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 136 0215 CHAPTER 7 DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Bicycle Facilities Bikeway Definitions The following section summarizes key operating and design definitions. Bicycle: The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) (1999) definition of a bicycle is "every vehicle propelled solely by human power which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels, except scooters and similar devices. The term 'bicycle' also includes three- and four -wheeled human - powered vehicles, but not tricycles for children." Class I: Referred to as a bike path, shared -use path, or multi -purpose trail. Provides for bicycle travel on a paved right-of-way completely separated from any street or highway. Other users may also be found on this type of facility. Class II: Referred to as a bike lane. Provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle travel on a street or highway. Class III: Referred to as a bike route. Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic. The following guidelines present the recommended minimum design standards and other recommended ancillary support items for shared use paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. Where possible, it may be desirable to exceed the minimum standards for shared use paths or bike lane widths, signage, lighting and traffic signal detectors. These guidelines cover basic concepts. The Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000, and the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities contain more detail standards and guidance and should be followed. Class I Bike Path Facilities Design Recommendations 1. All Class I bike paths should conform to the design guidelines set forth by Caltrans. 2. Class I bike paths should generally be designed as separated facilities away from parallel streets. They are commonly planned along rights -of -way such as waterways, utility corridors, railroads and the like that offer continuous separated riding opportunities. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 137 ,•1. 02 16 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES 3. Both AASHTO and Caltrans recommend against using most sidewalks for bike paths. This is due to conflicts with driveways and intersections. Where sidewalks are used as bike paths, they should be placed in locations with few driveways and intersections, should be properly separated from the roadway, and should have carefully designed intersection crossings. 4. Bike paths should have a minimum of eight feet of pavement, with at least two feet of unpaved shoulders for pedestrians/runners, or a separate tread way where feasible. Pavement width of 12 feet is preferred. 5. Multi -use trails and unpaved facilities that serve primarily a recreation rather than a transportation function and will not be funded with federal transportation dollars may not need to be designed to Caltrans standards. 6. Class I bike path crossings of roadways, other than at intersections, should be carefully engineered to accommodate safe and visible crossing for users. The design needs to consider the width of the roadway, whether it has a median, and the roadway's average daily and peak -hour traffic volumes. Crossings of low -volume streets may require simple stop signs. Crossings of streets with Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of approximately 15,000 should be assessed for signalized crossing, flashing LED beacons, crossing islands or other devices. Roundabouts can provide desirable treatment for a bike path intersecting with roadways where the bike path is not next to a parallel street. 7. Landscaping should generally consist of low water -consuming native vegetation and should have the least amount of debris. 8. Lighting should be provided where commuters will likely use the bike path in the late evening. Some cities in the Coachella Valley have Dark Sky Ordinances that may prohibit some bike path lighting. Those include Indian Wells, La Quinta, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. 9. Barriers at pathway entrances should be clearly marked with reflectors and be ADA accessible, as shown in Figure 1 (minimum five feet clearance). CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 138 0217 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Barrier Post Striping 3m Po9f +ery`y YOq mm YeRmv wlib' Figure 1: Bike Path Barrier Post Treatment 10. Bike path construction should take into account vertical requirements and the impacts of maintenance and emergency vehicles on shoulders. Class 11 Bike Lane Facilities Design Recommendations The following guidelines should be used when designing Class II bikeway facilities. These guidelines are provided by the Caltrans Highway Design Manual Chapter 1000, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the Caltrans Traffic Manual. 1. Class II Bike Lane facilities should conform to the minimum design standard of 5 feet in width in the direction of vehicle travel adjacent to the curb lane. Where space is available, a width of 6 to 8 feet is preferred, especially on busy arterial streets, on grades, and adjacent to parallel parking. 2. Under certain circumstances, bike lanes may be 4 feet in width. Situations where this is permitted include the following. • Bike lanes located between through traffic lanes and right turn pockets at intersection approaches. See Figure 4. • Where there is no parking, the gutter pan is no more than 12" wide, and the pavement is smooth and flush with the gutter pan. • Where there is no curb and the pavement is smooth to the curb. 3. "Bike Lane" signage, as shown in Figure 2, shall be posted after every significant intersection along the route of the bike lane facility. Directional signage may also accompany this sign to guide bicyclists along the route. If a bike lane exists where parking is prohibited, "no parking" signage may accompany bike lane signage. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 139 0218 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figure 2: Bike Lane Sign (Caltrans) 4. Bike lanes should be striped with a solid white stripe of width at least 4 inches and may be dashed up to 200 feet before the approach to an intersection. This design of a dashed bike lane allows for its dual use as a right -turn pocket for motor vehicles. 5. Stencils shall also be used within the lane on the pavement that read "bike lane" and include a stencil of a bicycle with an arrow showing the direction of travel. See Figure 3 below. Figure 3: Bike Lane Striping and Stencil 6. Bike lanes with two stripes are more visible than those with one and are preferred. The second stripe would differentiate the bike lane from the parking lane where appropriate. 7. Where space permits, intersection treatments should include bike lane 'pockets' as shown in Figure 4. 8. Loop detectors that detect bicycles should be installed near the stop bar in the bike lane at all signalized intersections where bicycles are not reasonably CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 140 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES accommodated. Signal timing and phasing should be set to accommodate bicycle acceleration speeds. Please see Figure 4. 0 � t� ��pnaenatlp t pn�m e�e� v�r�d�mlene is EEEiS Mi Presem.Wa dfim9�wldDt Ll t PoGifiJF.%Vh'E PlattEal mvNaY edge. NOTTO SCALE SOURCE: LunbLwG A Assn ]alas bssW ah s994 AASNTO G ift W IM INS Www d Skyck FaiNes, see8 Mani on Urvtorm Trelle Gamd ., P'.. Mfleytle 3 ptlep�an PUS, ana aner Marewa�. Figure 4: Bike Lane Treatment at Intersection (MUTCD, AASHTO) Class III Bike Route Facilities Design Recommendations Bike routes have been typically designated as simple signed routes along street corridors, usually local streets and collectors, and sometimes along arterials. With proper route signage, design, and maintenance, bike routes can be effective in guiding bicyclists along a route suited for bicycling without having enough roadway space to provide a dedicated Class II bike lane. Class III Bike Routes can be designed in a manner that encourages bicycle usage, convenience, and safety. There are a variety of other improvements that can enhance the safety and attraction of streets for bicyclists. Bike routes can become more useful when coupled with such techniques as the following: • Route, directional, and distance signage • Wide curb lanes • Sharrow stencils painted in the traffic lane along the appropriate path of where a bicyclist would ride in the lane • Accelerated pavement maintenance schedules • Traffic signals timed and coordinated for cyclists (where appropriate) • Traffic calming measures CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 141 02. 0 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES The following design guidelines should be used with the implementation of new Class III Bike Route facilities in the CVAG region. Proper "Bike Route" signage, as shown in Figure 5, should be posted after every intersection along the route of the bikeway. This will inform bicyclists that the bikeway facility continues and will alert motorists to the presence of bicyclists along the route. Directional signage may accompany this sign as well to guide bicyclists along the route. Figure 5: Class III Bike Route Sign This Plan recommends using the sharrow stencil as a way to enhance the visibility and safety of new Class III Bike Route facilities. The stencil should be placed outside of on -street vehicle parking to encourage cyclists to ride away from parked cars' open doors. They should also be placed at one or two locations on every block. M,. axecaf wuw.x Figure 6:Sharrow Stencil CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 142 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES A numbered bike route network may be devised as a convenient way for bicyclists to navigate through the valley much the way the numbered highway system guides motorists efficiently through the roadway network. This could be used on all classes of bikeways. An example of a numbered bikeway sign is shown in Figure 7. Figure 7: Numbered Bikeway Sign (MUTCD) Destination signs add value to bike routes and assist cyclists to develop a mental map of the route system. Arrows pointing to "Downtown," "Tedesco Park - 1.5 miles" or "College of the Desert" should be a standard part of the bikeway network. Destination signs should be placed at the intersection of bikeways to notify cyclists where each bike route goes. Signage Bikeway signage should conform to the signage standards identified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD, 2003) and the Caltrans Traffic Manual. These documents give specific information on the type and location of signage for the primary bikeway system. A full list of applicable on -street bikeway signage from the MUTCD is shown in Table 4. CVAG may want to add its own logo to give the bikeway signage a distinctive local flavor as shown below in Figure 8. These samples were developed for the 2001 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 143 0222 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES SIM.0 Ca1X 1.-Oapeament of Tanaponetbn om: M45 MUTCR ft.E ;Notes �nnnn000©oaonn a13=0® ®namomnnonono® Cdoro Boras.na -Wh.1 •Greenti.) vei BuxarouM. wnXyBoXwnw) CALTRANS CUSTOMIZED it. BIKEWAY SIGNS FOR COACHELLA VALLEY 61M. or Gilbrnl.- DBpertm.M of Tnnalwrbtlen MUTCOMUTCO N NuniOel: KoM nnanoan©annnn manna®®000ao®om Win©©®®m©®naoo® WPM eoiaeraM Lep-G.IftB u.) @aokWaana-WXX.(MI4CXV.1 CALTRANS CUSTOMIZED alter BIKEWAYSIGNS FOR COACHELLA VALLEY Figure 8: Custom CVAG Bikeway Signs CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 144 0223 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES TABLE 4: RECOMMENDED BIKEWAY SIGNAGE AND MARKINGS • • Bike Lane Ahead: Right Lane At beginning of bike lanes B on N/A 113-16 Bikes Only W R3-17 For motorists at a bikeway Wl l-15 with Bicycle Crossing crossing B on Y N/A W11-15a At the far side of significant B on Bike Lane arterial intersections W R81 Dl l-1 STOP Ahead Where a STOP sign is obscured B, Y W17 W3-1 on Signal Ahead Where signal is obscured B,R,G YW41 W3-3 Pedestrian Crossing Where a pedestrian walkway B on Y W54 W11A-2 crosses a bikeway At intersections where access Won G7 D1-1b(r/l) Directional Signs to major destinations is G G8 D1-1c available Right Lane Must Turn Right; Where a bike lane ends before B on R3-7 Begin Right Turn Here, Yield an intersection W R18 R4-4 to Bikes Bicycle Parking Bicycle parking is not standardized in any state or municipal code. However, there are preferable types of secure bicycle accommodations available. Bicycle parking is a critical component of the network and facilitates bicycle travel, especially for commuting and utilitarian purposes. The provision of bicycle parking at every destination ensures that bicyclists have a place to safely secure their mode of travel. Elements of proper bicycle parking accommodation are outlined below. Bike racks provide short-term parking. Bicycle racks should offer adequate support for the bicycles and should be easy to lock to. Figures 9 and 10 display a common inverted-U design that does this. Figure 11 depicts a multi -bicycle rack that works well.Figure 12 shows an innovative concept in which the bike rack itself looks like a bicycle. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 145 0224 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figures 9 and 10: "Inverted-U" Bicycle Rack Figure 11: Multi -Bicycle Parking Rack Figure 12: Bike Rack 2. Long-term parking should be provided for those needing all day storage or enhanced safety. Bicycle lockers offer good long-term storage, as shown in Figure 13. Attendant and automated parking also serves long-term uses. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 146 0225 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figure 13: Bicycle Lockers 3. Bicycle parking should be clearly identified by signage, such as in Figure 14. Signage shall also identify the location of racks and lockers at the entrance to shopping centers, buildings, and other establishments where parking may not be provided in an obvious location, such as near a front door. "0 Figure 14: Bicycle Parking Sign (Caltrans) 4. Bicycle parking should be located close to the front door of buildings and retail establishments in order to provide for the convenience, visibility, and safety of those who park their bicycles. 5. Bicycle lockers should have informational signage, placards, or stickers placed on or immediately adjacent to them identifying the procedure for how to use a locker. This information at a minimum should include the following: • Contact information to obtain a locker at City Hall or other administrating establishment • Cost (if any) for locker use • Terms of use • Emergency contact information CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 147 02ILI6 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES 6. Bicycle lockers should be labeled explicitly as such and shall not be used for other types of storage. 7. Bicycle racks and storage lockers should be bolted tightly to the ground in a manner that prevents their tampering. Drainage Grates Care must be taken to ensure that drainage grates are bicycle -safe. If not, a bicycle wheel may fall into the slots of the grate causing the cyclist to tumble. Replacing existing grates or welding thin metal straps across the grate perpendicular to the direction of travel is required to make them bicycle -safe. These should be checked periodically to ensure that the straps remain in place. Grates with bars perpendicular to the roadway must not be placed at curb cuts, because wheelchairs could also get caught in the slot. Figure 15 shows the appropriate types of drainage grates that should be used. ao c+.na fli Figure 15: Proper Drainage Grate Design Loop Detectors Loop detectors at signalized intersections should be designed to detect when a bicycle rides or stops over them. Loop detectors at the signalized intersections of minor streets (minor arterials or collectors) should have priority when retrofitting existing detectors where the minor approaches do not call a green phase during every signal cycle. However, in the long run all signalized intersections should provide Loops of other detection device to detect cyclists to provide for enhanced seamless travel. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 148 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Hiking and Equestrian Trails Trail Cross -Sections The Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District has developed some excellent Trail Development Standards that provide design details on different types of trails. Their Trail Development Standards include Class I bike paths as well as the following sub -categories of hiking and equestrian trails: • Combination Class I Bikeway/Regional Trail in urban and rural settings • Regional Trail in urban and rural settings • Regional Trail in Open Space Areas • Community Trail They include separate standards for each of these. The difference between Regional Trails and Community Trails relates to who will maintain them. Regional trails in urban and rural settings will be maintained by the Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District or by the Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency. Regional trails in open space areas will be maintained by the Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District or by the agency adopting the open space into its system. The Riverside County Regional Park and Open -Space District will maintain community trails in open areas until a local entity can be established. Community trails along roads will be maintained by the Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency until a local entity can be established. Their standards also detail materials, easements, fencing, paving standards and other features. This document refers readers to these Trail Development Standards. The City of La Quinta uses its own standard cross section for multipurpose trails. Figure 16 shows their standard. This standard represents a theme that other jurisdictions may want to adopt. Or they may want to adopt their own or the County's. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 149 on8 f CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES STREET RAY PARKWAY 20'.LANDSCAPED SETBACK . - 1Y MIN. TRAIL EASEMENT VARIABLE 10' MIN. �w r J � ]B" HIGH PVC "SPLIT" RAIL FENCE NTH TWO RAILS - ICHRIS A. VOGT CITY ENGINEER RCE 44250 0 W 0 o SIDEWALK a 1% _ _ 2,y� - P.GC. CURB AC. DIKE STANDARD 260 SHEET 1 OF 1 Figure 16: La Quinta Standard Cross -Section CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 150 02''9 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Trailheads Trailheads provide a place for trail users to park a car, trailer or .bicycle to begin a hike or ride on a horse. Typical features include: Auto parking o Equestrian trailer parking o Bicycle parking Signs to the trail Maps Interpretive signage G Horse corral Drinking trough Restrooms Refuse receptacles o Drinking fountains Figure 17: Trailhead Features Not all of these are needed at every trailhead. The features depend on the use of the trail, where it is, etc. Figure 18 depicts a full -feature trailhead. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 151 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES ` Figure 18: Trailhead with Full Amenities Trail Amenities Trail amenities enhance the user's experience. They provide conveniences that are sometimes necessary, and other times simply accommodating. Trail amenities attract users and enhance the overall experience. The following amenities can be added to trails where needed. Benches and rest areas o Drinking fountains Maps Landscaping • Lighting • Fencing A t Figures 19 and 20: Trail Amenities Signage Trail signage provides critical information for users. Good signage is important to safe trail use, informed trail use and convenience. Signage performs the following tasks: G Directs users to the trail Directs users to crossing trails Instructs users as to where trails go Provides distances of destinations along the trails Instructs users as to the type of use that is legal and what is not (hiking, horseback riding, mountain bicycling, walking dogs, etc.) CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 152 n 02� CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Instructs users as to who has the right-of-way and who yields to whom Provides information about maintaining the environment, rules on protecting habitat, areas that are off limits, etc. Provides interpretive information about the geology, cultural history, etc. Figure 21: Trail Etiquette Sign Local jurisdictions may want to adopt standard signage for hiking and equestrian trails. The California Manual on Traffic Control Devices designates the signs shown as Figures 22 to 25 below. Figure 22: Hiking Sign RS-068 Figure 23: Hiking Sign R-100 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 153 0�32 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figure 24: Equestrian Sign RS-064 Figure 25: Equestrian Sign R-110 Trail Crossings Trail crossings of streets present the most difficult challenge of designing safe and functional trails. Wherever trails cross streets utmost care should be used in designing the crossing. The following should be considered: 1. Ideally, trails should cross streets in separate locations from intersections. 2. Trail crossings should be treated like intersections with the appropriate crossing devices as warranted by the location. The design needs to consider the width of the roadway, whether it has a median, and the roadway's average daily and peak -hour traffic volumes. Crossings of low -volume streets may require simple stop signs. Crossings of streets with Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of approximately 15,000 should be assessed for signalized crossing, flashing LED beacons, crossing islands and other devices. Roundabouts can provide desirable treatment for a trail intersecting with roadways where the trail is not next to a parallel street. 3. Signage should warn motorists in advance of trail crossings. 4. Trail crossings should be marked on the pavement with zebra -stripe crosswalks. Advanced stop bars and advanced yield bars are desirable. 5. Trail crossings at right angles are easier to design than those at angles. 6. Where feasible, grade separated crossings are preferred. 7. Where equestrians are expected, push buttons for user -activated signals should be located at equestrian height. 8. Proper curb ramps.should be constructed at the crossings. Design Guidelines for New Development New development presents terrific opportunities to incorporate bikeways and trails into new communities. Challenges abound trying to retrofit existing streets that weren't build with adequate curb -to -curb width for bike lanes, as well as trying to add bike paths and trails without through rights -of -way. New development can be built with bikeways and trails as part of the circulation system and community form. Today's real estate market has dramatically slowed development, but it will likely CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 154 0'' 3 3 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES rebound in coming years. This section will present means to integrate bikeways and trails with new development. Land Use Planning Land use planning that adheres to smart growth principles provides opportunities for people to travel on bicycle, on foot or on trails. Mixing land uses brings origins and destinations closer to one another so that people can travel between them by non - motorized means. Compact land use that builds up more than out does the same. Comprehensive land use planning integrates parks and greenways so that bikeways and trails can be built in. Street Networks Street Networks Conducive to Non -Motorized Travel Bicyclists and pedestrians fare best in neighborhoods with well-connected streets that have small blocks. Such street networks bring many origins and destinations within walking and bicycling distance. They also spread traffic among more streets so that fewer wide, high-speed streets that discourage bicycling and walking are needed. Many destinations can be accessed along quiet, direct streets. In contrast, neighborhoods that have disconnected streets, cut -de -sacs, and walls force people to take longer, indirect routes that involve travel along high-speed arterial roads that are inhospitable to non -motorized users. The graphics below in Figures 26 and 27 contrast these two neighborhood types. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 155 023� CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Not This... This Figures 26 and 27: Street Network Forms Designing with Cut -de -Sacs As described above, connected street networks are preferred. However, where cut - de -sacs are used they can be made to work with bikeways and trails. In order for this to function, the ends of the cut -de -sacs need to be connected to the bike paths and trails that run in between. This can actually give bicyclists and trail users an advantage over motorists for short trips. Figure 28 illustrates this design. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 156 0235 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figure 28: Connected Cut -de -Sacs Integrating Trails into the Street Network The best way to integrate trails into new neighborhoods is to integrate them into the street network. This way the trail right-of-way receives the same treatment as another street with appropriate street crossings. Every section of street blocks would have one of its streets in the north -south, and one in the east -west direction designed as a bikeway and trail. The ideal cross-section would include a bike path and a parallel hiking/equestrian trail. The ultimate crossing of two-lane streets would be an appropriately sized roundabout. This would allow users to yield and continue on without stopping. Crossings of multi -lane streets should include the suitable treatments with crossing islands, flashing LED beacons, zebra -stripe crosswalks and/or signals where warranted. The graphics following in Figures 29 and 30 illustrate how this concept would work. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 157 0236 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Figure 29: Trail Integrated Neighborhood Graphic Figure 30: Trail Integrated Neighborhood Rendering CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 158 0237 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Road Standards New collector streets and streets higher on the hierarchy should include bicycle lanes. This means that the curb -to -curb cross section of these types of streets should have bike lanes included. Ideally 6' wide lanes should be used as a minimum with 7' or 8' bike lanes on wide, high-speed arterials. By including bike lanes in such road standards they will be built along with the new roads. Maintenance Guidelines It will be important to maintain the entire bicycle and trail facilities in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The frequency of this maintenance will vary significantly depending on the usage, weather, landscaping and other factors. The following presents some general guidelines. • On -road facilities such as bike lanes and bike paths need regular sweeping and painting. They should be maintained along with the street. • Bike racks need painting every five to ten years. Those with rubberized coating need replacement approximately every 10-15 years. Bicycle lockers should last a long time and maintenance should be done as needed. • Maintenance for off -road paths presents more of a challenge than on -road facilities because the maintenance won't be done as an incidental part of other maintenance. Well-built concrete pavement can last as long as 40 years and stay in good condition so long as it doesn't have much motor vehicle usage. But paths need regular sweeping, the frequency depending on adjacent vegetation and sand, as well as the frequency of strong winds that can blow sand onto paths. CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 159 0238 CHAPTER 7: DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES The following table presents some general maintenance guidelines. The actual frequency can be determined as local agencies gain experience with these facilities. TABLE S: MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES tem Shoulder and grass mowing Estimated Frequency: As needed Trash disposal As needed Pothole filling As needed Bollard replacement As needed Irrigate/water plants Depends on plant material; best to select drought -tolerant Graffiti removal As needed Fountain/restroom cleaning/repair Weekly cleaning / Repair as needed Pavement sweeping As needed; depends on adjacent landscape Weed control As needed Tree, shrub, Et grass trimming/fertilization 6 months- 1 year Sign replacement/repair 5-7 years Repaint lanes and pavement stencils - paint 2-4 years and at the time of pavement sealing/repaving Repaint lanes and pavement stencils - thermoplastic 7-10 years and at the time of pavement sealing/repaving Maintain irrigation lines/replace sprinklers As needed Lighting replacement/repair As needed Maintain furniture As needed Pavement sealing/repaving 7-10 years CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 160 0239 APPENDICES Appendix A - Workshop Notes Appendix B - Organizational Comments CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 161 0240 APPENDICES Appendix A: Workshop Notes October 28 - Palm Desert Issues 1. Cook Street - elimination of bike lanes: Palm Desert wants additional vehicle lane in both directions. Is it possible for the city to add a lane in one direction on Cook Street and a lane in the other direction on Portola Avenue to keep bike lanes on Cook? 2. Recommend uniform signage Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Jefferson Street corridor - include bike lanes on new bridge and south to PGA 2. Dillon Road bike lanes 3. Connection between Miles Avenue/bike path and Eldorado Drive through Indian Wells Golf Course as a substitute for SR-111 4. Portola Avenue between Magnesia Falls Drive and Fred Waring Drive 5. Bike path opportunity along rail corridor pipeline October 29 - Blythe Issues 1. Important to implement existing plans 2. Adjust map to show new multipurpose path along north side of 141h Avenue from 71h Street to Williams Road 3. Adjust map to eliminate future bike path along 7th Street canal between Hobson Way and 14`h Avenue Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Conduct field work on new multipurpose path along 14`h Avenue to adjust map 2. Conduct field work to investigate feasibility of bike path along 7th Street Canal south of Hobson Way October 30 - Palm Springs Issues 1. Planning needed between Ramon Road and SR-111 2. North/south routes in all cities suggested 3. SR-62 needs better shoulder maintenance 4. Better education needed for both motorists and bicyclists CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 162 APPENDICES Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Better connection between Tahquitz Creek and Whitewater River 2. Dune Palms and Adams Street could be candidates for "road diets" 3. SR-86 CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 163 APPENDICES Appendix B: Organizational Comments Go Bike Issues 1. College campuses are important locations to serve 2. Airport Boulevard could be a good corridor for workers in the industrial area 3. Extend the Palm Desert Railroad bike path into other cities Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Mecca 2. Avenues 62 and 66 3. Grapefruit Boulevard 4. Railroad corridor 5. Palm Springs to Desert Hot Springs corridor 6. Hacienda Avenue 7. Pierson Boulevard 8. Cabot's in Desert Hot Springs for trailhead Desert Bicycle Club Issues 1. Ensure that new Jefferson Street bridge includes bike lanes 2. Cook Street bike lane elimination 3. Share the road signs would help 4. "Sharrows" may be good in some locations 5. SR-111 has safety issues along its entire length 6. Ramon Road at 1000 Palms Canyon Road: signage needed to alert motorists 7. La Quinta should remove "bicycles use sidewalk" signage 8. Dillon Road should have low priority 9. Maintenance is very important 10. Fred Waring Drive's lack of bike lanes and vehicle speed 11. Lack of good/safe connections between Palm Springs and Cathedral City 12. Need valley -wide signs Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Frank Sinatra Drive on Rancho Mirage/Palm Desert boundary; will bike lanes fit? 2. Whitewater Wash bike path CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 164 0^43 APPENDICES 3. Hovely Lane as a substitute for SR-111's loss of bike lanes; connectivity very important 4. Can Highway 111 be striped if it doesn't have space for bike lanes? 5. Ensure that Jefferson Street overpass has bike lanes 6. Fred Waring Drive from San Pablo Avenue to Eldorado Drive Coachella Valley Trails Alliance Issues 1. Cook Street bike lane elimination 2. SR-111 should have bike lanes the whole way 3. Don't want trails closed 4. Whitewater and Coachella Canal should have paths 5. Connectivity is very important 6. Cross Valley bikeways and trails are needed Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. SR-111 the whole way 2. Need better connections between Palm Springs and Cathedral City 3. 615C Avenue from Whitewater River to Coachella Canal 4. Coachella Canal 5. Whitewater River 6. Cleveland Street from SR-111 to Salton Sea north shore path 7. Parkside Drive from proposed Salton Sea north shore path to Coachella Canal Desert Riders Issues 1. Bike paths/lanes and trails should complement each other and provide better access between the two 2. Look at trail plans completed in Desert Hot Springs Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Palm Canyon - trail continuity issue 2. Whitewater Trail in North Palm Springs may be better further south because of wind 3. Need trail along canal to new school near Cleveland Street and the Salton Sea CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 165 •.a. 0944 APPENDICES Issues 1. They want trails that are being planned incorporated into the CVAG plan 2. Maintain equestrian uses 3. Maintain all disciplines, such as the Arenas, 3-Day Course 4. Developers are required to dedicate easements in Life Style Corridors in new development in the Santa Rosa area, etc. 5. They would like a new horse arena 6. Don't need posted rail fences; even a 5'-wide pass through is adequate 7. Traitheads need to have parking large enough for horse trailers. Some are too small today. They also need a hitching rails and water troughs. 8. Show existing trailhead at Lake Cahuilla Equestrian Campground on maps 9.. They need signage to campground, and from the campground to the trails 10.Prefer that trails be integrated into new development over trails directly next to roads 11.Connectivity is very important Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Need a new trailhead just north of Avenue 58 @ Harrison Street 2. Need a new trailhead for Coachella Preserve 3. Need parking for Willis Palms Trail in Coachella Preserve 4. Incorporate plans for changes in the Travertine development 5. Extend trail along Madison Street from Avenue 58 to Avenue 62 and Lake Cahuilla Desert Trails Coalition Issues: 1. Consider how to coordinate trails on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land in areas that are not in a conservation area. BLM weighs needs for trails against habitat conservation. A Memorandum of Understanding is needed on BLM land to establish a trail. Riverside County Park and Open Space District Issues 1. The County has a list of priority trails 2. The County advocates bike paths and trails in Joshua Tree 3. Most trails are north -south; east-west/cross valley trails are needed CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 166 Ot 0?45 APPENDICES 4. All trails have to be maintained 5. Will require trails in new development Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. 62nd Avenue 2. Airport Blvd bridge 3. Vista Santa Rosa 4. Thermal 5. Mecca 6. North of 1-10 along Coachella Canal 7. Along Lake Cahuilla corridor southeast to fish facility Palm Springs Unified School District Issues 1. The City of Desert Hot Springs is developing a Master Plan for Parks that includes walking paths and a bike path 2. It was suggested that bike paths be developed near schools Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Tahquitz Creek 2. Corsini Park could serve as a "back way" into Joshua Tree National Park via Long Canyon Coachella Valley Unified School District Issues 1. Need good bikeway connections to all schools 2. New schools will be built and will need good bikeway connections Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. To Mt. Vista School in Indio from Avenue 50/Coachella Canal 2. Calhoun Street between Avenue 49 and Avenue 50 3. Frederick Street from Avenues 49to 52 4. 7th Street near Palm View Elementary School 5. Connection between Palm View Elementary and Bobby Duke Middle School 6. Connection between Avenue 53/Shady Lane and Bobby Duke Middle School 7. Church Street between Polk Street and Grapefruit Boulevard Desert Sands Unified School District CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 167 0246 APPENDICES Issues 1. Need good bikeway connections to existing and planned schools 2. Need to connect new school on Avenue 39 Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Jefferson Street from Avenue 38 to Avenue 40 2. Avenue 40 between Monroe Street and Jefferson Street 3. Avenue 47 from Harrison Street to the Coachella Canal 4. Avenue 48 from Harrison Street to the Coachella Canal 5. Tyler Street from Avenue 50 to Vista del Norte 6. Adams Street and Francis Way from Varner Road to Washington Street Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Issues 1. They usually cooperate with cities and let them take the lead on bikeway and trail planning 2. They don't want trails entering the Indian Canyons without users going through the entrance gate Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Reroute planned trail along Palm Canyon to go through the entrance gate 2. Add bike path along Palm Canyon and route through entrance gate Torres -Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians Issues 1. There are plans for a 5,000-acre development on the Riverside/Imperial County border. They would like bikeways to connect. 2. They want connections to the Whitewater River Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. They marked up a map showing roads they would like bike lanes on. These included the following. 2. 681h Avenue from SR-111 to Lincoln Street 3. Lincoln Street from 68th Avenue to the Whitewater River 4. 701h Avenue from Lincoln Street to Harrison Street 5. Pierce Street from 66th Avenue to Harrison Street 6. 69th Avenue from Pierce Street to Filmore Street 7. 74th Avenue from Pierce Street to Filmore Street CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 168 0247 APPENDICES 8. 68th Avenue from Filmore Street to Polk Street 9. Polk Street/Martinez Road from 66th Avenue to 70th Avenue 10. Middleton Street from 66th Avenue to Harrison Street 11.Monroe Street from 62"d Avenue to 64th Avenue 12.64t" Avenue from Monroe Street to Van Buren Street 13.Jackson Street/66th Avenue from 64th Avenue to Van Buren Street 14. Painted Canyon needs a trail Caltrans District 8 Issues 1. Nearly all of the state highways within built-up areas have been, or soon will be, relinquished to the local jurisdiction. 2. Caltrans uses a standard that incorporates an 8-foot shoulder on rural highways. This is usually suitable for bicycles to ride on. 3. Caltrans keeps a list of state highways that bicyclists are permitted to ride on. All of the state highways that are candidates for bikeways in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys permit cyclists. Those are: o SR-111 o SR-62 o SR-86S (except for a small segment between Dillon Road and 1-10) (need to confirm) o SR-78 (Palo Verde Valley) o US-95 (Palo Verde Valley) Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. SR-111 2. SR-62 3. SR-86S 4. SR-78 5. SR-95 SunLine Transit Issues 1. Bike lockers requested at SR-111 and Flower, Town Center, Monte Hall, Baristo Road CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 169 APPENDICES 2. All buses have bike racks; newer buses have bike racks with capacity for three bikes Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. SunLine Transit will send a prioritized list of bus stops to add lockers and/or racks United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Issues 1. The cities have no jurisdiction over federal lands 2. Jim Foote marked up the map to remove proposed trails that either exist or likely never will Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Bump and Grind Trail should be opened by the City. There is a fence on Magnesia Falls Drive/Desert Drive west of SR-111 to trails. Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy They are creating a plan for earthen trails in the northern part of the Coachella Valley. They will send their plan when it is ready. (Sent and incorporated.) College of the Desert Issues 1. Need direct bicycle access to college campuses in Palm Desert and new campuses in (East Valley Campus) Mecca and Palm Springs (West Valley Campus). 2. Need bicycle parking, showers and clothing lockers. Streets or Corridors to Investigate for New Bikeways or Trails 1. Indian Avenue 2. Add bicycle parking to East and West campuses 3. Add showers and clothing lockers to East and West campuses CVAG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan Update 170 Tit�t 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Opposing CONSENT CALENDAR: 91 Provisions in the State Budget Proposal to Eliminate Redevelopment Agencies in California STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution opposing provisions in the State Budget Proposal to eliminate redevelopment agencies in California. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: It is important to remember that four major items must be taken into consideration when analyzing the fiscal impact of the Governors proposal to eliminate the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency on June 30, 201 1: 1) the City was incorporated after passage of Proposition 13 and as a result the amount of property taxes that are received from the County of Riverside are less than cities that were incorporated before Proposition 13; 2) 80% of the cities boundaries are in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency so this proposal has a significant impact on the City and over 10% of the City is in the Riverside County's Thermal Redevelopment Agency so less than 5% of the City boundaries are not in a Redevelopment Agency; 3) the taxpayers will not see their property taxes reduced; and 4) the proposal will take away the tax increment property tax revenues that is generated in this community for much needed capital and housing projects, that will directly benefit the residents and visitors of this community. As an example, the Governors proposal would take $1.7 billion in property tax increment generated State-wide in FY 2011 /2012 and use it for State purposes. A similar take of $2 billion in FY 2008/2009 resulted in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency making a $23.5 million payment to the State of California. Funding goes toward repaying the debt service, pass through payments to other governmental 0'_50 entities such as the Desert Sands Unified School District, Coachella Valley Unified School District, Desert Community College District, and the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, and housing commitments which provides for affordable housing projects within our community for those who would otherwise not afford to live in La Quinta. Additionally, it is projected that this proposal would result in another $20 million take. Quite simply the General Fund cannot afford another $10 million borrowing which is why the voters in the State of California enacted Proposition 22 to prevent this from happening again. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Last November, California voters approved Proposition 22, once again reaffirming the message they have sent to California again and again: local funds should remain local and pay for services and programs in their own communities. An overwhelming 61 % of voters elected to stop State raids of local government funds, including redevelopment funds. In doing so, they prohibited the state from requiring a community development agency to remit property tax to or for the benefit of the state or any jurisdiction directly or indirectly. This proposal will destroy local economic development, including hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in local economic activity throughout California. In fact, in La Quinta, California, abolishing redevelopment will destroy many public works and housing projects, including: major roadway construction and reconstruction throughout the City; storm drain improvements; construction of a fire station in the southeast section of the City; improvements, expansion, and upgrades to City facilities; new public facilities (fire station, parks); major infrastructure projects that will facilitate commercial development; bridge improvements; and single and multi- family affordable housing projects. These projects are proposed to generate over 2,300 construction -related jobs, generate millions of dollars in local economic activity, including over $14 million in State and local revenues, and facilitate further economic and community development. Redevelopment is an essential tool for the state's economic recovery. Redevelopment, which has been around since the 1950s, is a tool for building communities that in turn grow the State overall economy. It builds and improves communities, spurs job growth and taxes and is the most significant provider of infrastructure, urban development and affordable housing in the state. The City recognizes that this represents one of the toughest state budget proposals in history. The City has reduced its workforce and implemented other cost cutting 0'51 measures over the past two fiscal years to maintain a balanced budget. More than $4 million in General Fund expenditure reductions were made consisting of reductions in all departments to balance the budgets in FY 2009-2010. Staff will be presenting an all funds mid -year analysis of FY 2010/2011 revenues and expenditures at the February 15, 2011 meeting to the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency. Cities and counties throughout the State of California need to send a strong message that taking local funding — particularly funding that creates such a great number of jobs and fuels economic growth is not the way for the state to solve its fiscal problems and will only make the cities' and state's economic situation worse. Therefore, the City Council of the City of La Quinta strongly opposes provisions in the State Budget Proposal to eliminate redevelopment agencies in California. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1 . Adopt a resolution opposing provisions in the State Budget Proposal to eliminate redevelopment agencies in California; or 2. Do not adopt a resolution opposing provisions in the State Budget Proposal to eliminate redevelopment agencies in California; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Bret M. Plumlee Assistant City Manager -Management Services Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager 0252 RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE STATE BUDGET PROPOSAL TO ABOLISH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES IN CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, as part of its fiscal year 2011-12 State budget proposal, the Governor has proposed permanently abolishing California's more than 400 local redevelopment agencies; and WHEREAS, this proposal represents more of the same misguided and illegal State budget raids of local government funds that voters have repeatedly sought to end, most recently in November 2010 when an overwhelming 61 % of voters elected to stop State raids of local government funds, including redevelopment funds; and WHEREAS, this proposal will bring very little financial benefit to the State. According to the State Controller's Office, redevelopment agencies have more than $87 billion in bond and other contractual obligations that legally must be repaid before revenues are available to any other purpose. In fact, according to the State Department of Finance's own budget documents, there will be zero State savings in future years from shutting down redevelopment; and WHEREAS, this proposal will destroy local economic development, including hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in local economic activity throughout California. In fact, in La Quinta, California, abolishing redevelopment will destroy many public works and housing projects, including: major roadway construction and reconstruction throughout the City; storm drain improvements in several major roadways; construction of a fire station in the southeast section of the City; improvements, expansion, and upgrades to City facilities; new public facilities (fire station, parks); major infrastructure projects that will facilitate commercial development; bridge improvements; and single and multi- family affordable housing projects. These projects are proposed to generate over 2,300 construction -related jobs, generate millions of dollars in local economic activity, including over $14 million in State and local revenues, and facilitate further economic and community development; and WHEREAS, it is important to remember that four major items must be taken into consideration when analyzing the fiscal impact of the Governors proposal to eliminate the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency on June 30, 201 1: 1) the City was incorporated after passage of Proposition 13 and as a result the amount of property taxes that are received from the County of Riverside are less than cities that were incorporated before Proposition 13; 2) 80% of the cities 0153 Resolution No. 2011- Opposition to State Budget Proposal - RDA Abolishment Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 2 boundaries are in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency so this proposal has a significant impact on the City and over 10% of the City is in the Riverside County's Thermal Redevelopment Agency so less than 5% of the City boundaries are not in a Redevelopment Agency; 3) the local taxpayers will not see their property taxes reduced; and 4) the proposal will take away the tax increment property tax revenues that is generated in this community for much needed capital and housing projects, that will directly benefit the residents and visitors of this community.; and WHEREAS, the Governors proposal would take $1.7 billion in property tax increment generated State-wide in FY 201 1 /2012 and use it for State purposes. A similar take of $2 billion in FY 2008/2009 resulted in the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency making a $23.5 million payment to the State of California. Funding goes toward repaying the debt service, pass through payments to other governmental entities such as the Desert Sands Unified School District, Coachella Valley Unified School District, Desert Community College District, and the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, and housing commitments which provides for affordable housing projects within our community for those who would otherwise not afford to live in La Quinta. Additionally, it is projected that this proposal would result in another $20 million take; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that this represents one of the toughest state budget proposals in history. The City has reduced its workforce and implemented other cost cutting measures over the past two fiscal years to maintain a balanced budget. More than $4 million in General Fund expenditure reductions were made consisting of reductions in all departments to balance the budgets in FY 2009-2010. Staff will be presenting an all funds mid -year analysis of FY 2010/2011 revenues and expenditures at the February 15, 2011 meeting to the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency. Cities and counties throughout the State of California need to send a strong message that taking local funding — particularly funding that creates such a great number of jobs and fuels economic growth is not the way for the state to solve its fiscal problems and will only make the cities' and state's economic situation worse.; and WHEREAS, throughout California, redevelopment activities support 304,000 jobs annually, including 170,600 construction jobs, contribute over $40 billion annually to California's economy in the generation of goods and services, and generates more than $2 billion in state and local taxes in a typical year; and WHEREAS, eliminating redevelopment will take away one of the few tools local governments have to comply with state requirements to plan for more 0254 Resolution No. 2011- Opposition to State Budget Proposal - RDA Abolishment Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 3 compact urban development supported by transit -oriented development, housing, jobs and infrastructure; and WHEREAS, eliminating redevelopment will destroy the development of affordable housing in California. Redevelopment agencies are the second largest funder of affordable housing, behind only the federal government, responsible for over 98,000 units of affordable housing since 1993; and WHEREAS, shutting down redevelopment agencies is a violation of multiple State and Federal constitutional provisions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: La Quinta formally opposes the Administration's proposal to abolish redevelopment in California. THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: La Quinta authorizes its council and city staff to communicate its opposition to this proposal to the Governor, the Legislature, business groups, and citizens. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 1 st day of February, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 0255 Resolution No. 2011- Opposition to State Budget Proposal — RDA Abolishment Adopted: February 1, 2011 Page 4 ATTEST: VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CIVIC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0256 w,q 4 .fwQw«Z COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Partial Funding for an Adoption Services Coordinator Position at the Coachella Valley Animal Campus RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: The maximum cost to the City of La Quinta to fund the position would be $20,000 for one year. This cost could decrease depending on the participation of other cities. There is no budgeted appropriation in the FY 2010/201 1 to pay for the first six months of this service. An appropriation from available General Fund unallocated reserves would be required (101-0000.290-00.00) In addition, funds would have to budgeted during next year's FY 201 1 /2012 budget process to pay for the other six months. Sufficient Funds for the unbudgeted expenditure exist in Account # 101-0000-290.00-00. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: On October 7, 2003, the City of La Quinta entered into an agreement with Riverside County for animal shelter services which were to be provided at the Coachella Valley Animal Campus upon the facility's completion which occurred in January 2006. The agreement is included as Attachment 1. The term of the current agreement with the County is set to expire on January 16, 2012. In March of 2010, the County informed the City that at the end of the current contract term (January 16, 2012), the cost for the shelter service would be increased from approximately $74,000 to $113,017 a year. On November 16, 2010, the City Council considered the options available for shelter services and decided to continue to contract with the County and renew the contract in January 2012. The cost associated with the renewed contract and considered by the City Council on that date ($113,017) included funding for the Adoption Services coordinator. In December 2010, funding for the position of Adoption Services Coordinator at the animal campus was eliminated. The cost for the position is approximately $60,000 annually. Prior to the elimination of the position, the coordinator arranged adoptions for 165 La Quinta animals during the 2010 calendar year. At the January 2011 Animal Campus meeting, Palm Desert Councilmember Finnerty requested that the participating cities agree to fund and reinstitute the eliminated position. Included as Attachment 2 is a letter from the County's Department of Animal Services discussing the position and the funding needed to re -instate the position. La Quinta's portion of the funding would be $15,000 for one year assuming that Rancho Mirage, Indian Wells and Palm Desert would also fund $15,000 each. To date, Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage have agreed to fund up to $20,000 for the position. Indian Wells is scheduled to consider the item on February 3, 2011. It should be noted that since the proposed cost of the new contract with the County, which begins in January of 2012, includes the Adoption Services Coordinator, approval of the item by the City Council today would fund the position between now and January of 2012. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Agree to fund up to $20,000 for one year for an Adoption Services Coordinator at the Animal Campus; or 2. Agree to fund an amount less than $20,000 for an Adoption Services Coordinator; or 3. Do not agree to fund the position; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 0"_58 Respectfully submitted, tom - Tom Hartung, Director of Building and Safety Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Current Contract with Riverside County for Shelter Services 2. Letter from the Department of Animal Services r. 01159 CL-1`� y COACHELLA VALLEY ANIMAL CAMPUS CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES ATTACHMENT 1 This CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES (this "Contract") is entered into as of 10/ 7 , 2003, by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California (the "County"), and the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation ("the City"). RECITALS A. Pursuant to an indenture, lease agreement and related documents, the Riverside County Palm Desert Authority (the "RCPDFA") and the County are cooperating in the financing and development of the Coachella Valley Animal Campus (the "Facility"), which is located at _(address pending)_ Rio del Sol, Riverside County, California. B. The County will lease the Facility from the RCPDFA and operate and manage the Facility and provide certain animal shelter and care services and enter into contracts with cities that wish to use the Facility in the performance of their public duties. C. The City wishes to utilize the services at the Facility for a six year period and has agreed to pay the County a portion of the costs of operating the Facility, to appoint a representative to an oversight and policymaking body for the Facility (the "Animal Campus Commission"), and to undertake certain other actions as provided in this Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the County and the City agree as follows: COUNTY SERVICES County shall operate the Facility as a first class animal shelter that provides the services described on Exhibit A "Scope of Services" which is incorporated herein by this reference. 2. TIME OF COMPLETION [PRELIMINARY ONLY, Based on tentative construction completion date] The term of this Contract shall begin on [December 1st, 2004] and end on [December I st, 2010], unless extended or terminated earlier as provided below. 0''_60 12395.0001\721700.2 COPYOCT 2 8 2003 3• 0 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT A. Compensation. The maximum amount payable to the County during the first year of the term under this Contract is $ 70,223.00 (the "Annual Compensation"). Thereafter yearly, the Annual Compensation to County for shelter services may be increased in an amount not to exceed the December to December Consumer Price Index (CPI) published for Riverside County or actual shelter operating budget, whichever is less. Additional services above and beyond what is listed as shown in Exhibit A may be added to the scope of services only when such increase is mutually agreed upon between County and City pursuant to a recommendation by the Animal Campus Commission as set forth in Section 9.01 of the Bylaws of the Coachella Valley Animal Campus. B. Method of Payment. Payment shall be made according to the schedule and terms described on Exhibit "B", "Payment Schedule", which is incorporated herein by this reference. All expenses of County are included in the amounts payable pursuant to Exhibit B, and no expenses shall be reimbursed separately." 4. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSON The City agrees to appoint a representative to the Animal Campus Commission, a California non-profit corporation, and to cause its representative to participate diligently in the oversight of the operator, operation budget and this Contract. 5. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT County shall not assign this Contract, or any part thereof, without the prior express written consent of the City. NO PERSONAL LIABILITY No member, official or employee of the City shall be liable personally to County or any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to County or any successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Contract. INDEMNIFICATION A. County shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including, without limitation, any fines imposed by administrative or regulatory bodies, and costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with: (a) the negligent or willful misconduct of County or its 12395.0001\721700.2 0261 officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers; (b) County's performance of its obligations and conduct of its agents hereunder; or (c) County's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement; except such loss or damage which was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. B. City shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify County and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including, without limitation, any fines imposed by administrative or regulatory bodies, and costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with: (a) the negligent or willful misconduct of City or its officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers; (b) City's performance of its obligations and conduct of its agents hereunder; or (c) City's failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement; except such loss or damage which was caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the County or its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. C. The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against County under this Section because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Contract. The hold harmless, indemnification and duty to defend provisions of this Section shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described herein. INSURANCE A. County must procure and maintain, at its own expense, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under this Contract by the County, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. B. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage must be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 00 01 01 96). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00 01 12 93 covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). (3) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employers Liability Insurance. (4) Professional Liability Insurance appropriate to the County's profession covering all negligent acts, errors and omissions. 12395,0001\721700.2 0 -26 2 C. Minimum Limits of Insurance. County must maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of $1,000,000 for bodily injury by accident and $1,000,000 per person and in the annual aggregate for bodily injury by disease. (Required only if County has employees). (4) Professional Liability Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence. D. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed $ E. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City and its respective commissioners, members, officers, agents and employees are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the County; and liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the County. (2) For any claims related to this Contract, the County's insurance coverage must be primary insurance as respects the City and its respective commissioners, members, officers, agents, and employees. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City and its respective commissioners, members, officers, agents or employees shall be excess of County's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) The certificates of insurance shall provide that the respective insurance policy shall not be terminated without first _ providing thirty (30) days' written notice to the City of such termination. 12395,0001\721700.2 0263 F. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. Insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its respective commissioners, members, officers, agents and employees for losses arising from work performed by County or for the City. G. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A. M. Best's rating of no less than ANII. H. Verification of Coverage. County must furnish the City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements evidencing coverage required by this clause. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements may be on forms provided by the City. All certificates and endorsement are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements demonstrating the coverage required by these specifications at any time. REPORTS AND INFORMATION At such reasonable times and in such reasonable forms as the City may require, the County shall furnish the City or its designated representative such statements, records, reports, data and information about the services provided at the Facility and any field services provided by the County in the City as the City may reasonably request. County shall respond in writing within thirty (30) days to any such request. 10. CONFLICTS No employee, agent, contractor, officer or official of the City, or the County, who exercises any functions or responsibilities with respect to this Contract or who is in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to it, shall obtain a personal or financial interest in or benefit from any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for himself or herself or for those with whom they have family or business ties, during his or her tenure or for one year thereafter. 11. NONDISCRIMINATION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND MINORITY AND WOMAN -OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES A. There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person, or group of persons, on account of race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry, sex, age, marital or domestic partner status, sexual orientation or disability in the performance of this Contract. County will ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry, sex, age, marital or domestic partner status, sexual orientation or disability. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training, including apprenticeship; and provision of any services or accommodations to clients or the general public. 5 0264 12395.0001\721700.2 B. County will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by it or on its behalf, state it is an equal opportunity employer. C. County will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Contract so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. 12. TERMINATION After a period of 5 years, either party may terminate this Contract without cause upon provision of a written notice of a minimum of 12 months in advance prior to the effective date of such termination. 13. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Notices All notices, demands, consents or approvals required under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when delivered personally or by facsimile transmission or three (3) business days after being deposited in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to the City: CITY OF LA OUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La uinta, 9 53 Attention: Tom Hartung If to County: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 82-675 Highway 111 Indio, LA 20i Attention: Michael O'Connor or to such other addresses as the parties may designate by notice as set forth above. B. Time of Performance (1) Time is of the essence in the performance of all the terms and conditions of this Contract. (2) All performance and cure periods expire at 5 p.m., Pacific Standard Time, on the applicable date. (3) A performance or cure date which otherwise would be a Saturday, Sunday or City holiday shall be extended to the next City working day. b 12395.00W721700.2 Q? 65 C. Successors and Assigns This Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the City and the County. Where the term "County" or "City" is used in this Contract, it shall mean and include their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that the City shall have no obligation under this Contract to, nor shall any benefit of this Contract accrue to, any unapproved successor or assign of County where City approval of a successor or assign is required by this Contract- D. Modification. Waiver and Amendment Any modification, waiver or amendment of any of the provisions of this Contract must be in writing and signed by both the City and County. Entire Contract This Contract represents the complete agreement between the parties as to the matters described herein, and there are no oral understandings between County and the City affecting this Contract not set forth herein. This Contract supersedes all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings between County and the City with respect to the subject matter hereof. F. Severability If any provision of this Contract shall be determined to be illegal or unenforceable, such determination shall not affect any other provision and all such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. G. Governing Law This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. H. Headings Titles of parts or sections of this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting its provisions. Attorneys' Fees In any action or proceeding arising out of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 12395.0001\721700.2 0266 J. Authority The undersigned represents and warrants that he or she has full power and authority to enter into this Contract and to bind the County in accordance with its terms. K. Designated Representative The initial designated representative for the City for this Contract is: Tom H a r t u n o The initial County designated representative for this Contract is: Michael O'Connor L. Venue All proceedings involving disputes over the terms, provisions, covenants or conditions contained in this Contract and all proceedings involving any enforcement action related to this Contract shall be initiated and conducted in the applicable court or forum in Riverside County, California. M. Captions and Headings The captions and headings contained in this Contract are provided for identifications purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading. iN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and County have executed this Contract as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision ofjhe State of California APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Counsel Mayor, 1 12395.0001\721700.2 corporation. 0>61 OCT 2 a 1r,11 3• "/ Attest, City Clerk, City of La Quinta APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: 2 City Attorney 123950001\721700.2 9 .,�, 0: SCOPE OF SERVICES Hours of Operation for Shelter: Monday: 10 AM to 4 PM Tuesday: 10 AM to 4 PM; Wednesday: 10 AM to 4 PM Thursday: 1 PM to 7 PM Friday: 10 AM to 4 PM Saturday: 10 AM to 4 PM Sunday: Closed Government Code Holidays: Closed HOUSING Indoor/Outdoor Kennels Shelter of stray dogs and cats Large animal holding facilities (if requested by City) Disposal of dead animals Euthanasia services Accept owner turned in animals Quarantine of animals suspected of rabies or dangerous to the public 24 hour, 7 day a week access to facility for all city field animal control officers ADOPTION SERVICES Adoptions Grooming facilities Licensing of animals (optional service, if selected by City) Reclaim of lost or impounded animals Vaccination of incoming animals Website program and access Promote and assist in low cost - no cost spay/neuter services Vaccination clinics Micro chip implant services Facility Features for Adoptions: Puppy rooms Specialty kennels Get acquainted rooms Outdoor exercise area 10 12395.0001\721700.2 '.« Q.)69 PAYMENT SCHEDULE ANIMAL CAMPUS - OPERATIONAL BUDGET FOR THE FOLLOWING JURISDICTIONS: Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Coachella, and Riverside County ANNUAL ALLOCATION FOR JURISDICTIONS For O erations of Animal Shelter Jurisdiction Annual Allocation Allocation Percentage Desert Hot Springs $ 71,465 12.84 % Cathedral City 90,482 16.26 % Rancho Mirage 28,825 5.18 % Palm Desert 109,599 19.69 % Indian Wells 4,604 .83 % La Quinta 70,223 12.62 % Coachella 31,320 5.63 % Riverside County 150,000 26.95 % TOTAL $ 556,518 100 % Above Based Upon: Estimated Budget: $ 556,518 Method of Payment: In order to operate the Facility, it is preferred that all payments be made annually, due and payable on or about July 1". A jurisdiction may, however, choose to pay in quarterly installments, of equal amounts, with the first payment beginning on or about July I" and payments made thereafter quarterly (or about, October 1, January I and April 1). Checks shall be made payable to the County of Riverside. 11 12395.0001\721700.2 0'' 7 III* SPDEPARTMENT QP AmNim Saw= Riverside Cuuety Community Vaal:h A;,,^ncy City of Palm Desert City of Indian Wells City of Rancho Mirage Dear City Partners: City of Desert Hot Springs City of Coachella City of La Quinta ATTACHMENT 2 Department of Animal Services Rohert Miller, Director January 20, 2011 City of Cathedral City Riverside County's Department of Animal Services recently was required to reduce its department budget, and additional budget reductions are required in the coming fiscal year. For some time, the County of Riverside has greatly supplemented the costs at the Coachella Valley Animal Campus, including providing an adoption partner coordinator. This position was defunded this year, causing some understandable concern among our city partners. Although our remaining staff has done a great job of filling in and coordinating transfers to animal rescue groups, I recognize that some cities are interested in restoring the position and funding it out of their own budgets. The duties associated with that position included but were not limited to: • assisting potential adopters seeking to adopt pets from the CVAC; • coordinaturg the adoption of shelter animals; • performing inspection of adoptive homes/rescue facilities; • coordinating spay/neutering of animals for outreach adoptions; • transporting animals to outreach events; and • acting as point of contact for rescue groups (adoption partners) and coordinating the adoption of shelter animals to adoption partners, while developing and maintaining relationships with existing or new partners. The starting cost of this position is approximately $60,000 annually including salary and benefits. Depending on the number of cities participating, the costs associated to each jurisdiction that chooses to participate will be proportional. For example, if three cities participate, the cost per city would be 1/3 or $20,000.00. For four cities the ratio would be '/ per city or $15,000.00. Riverside County Community Health Agency DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES - Administrative Offices 6851 Van Buren Blvd. Riverside, California 92509 (951) 358-7387 r FAX (951) 358-7300 TDD (951) 358-5124 I welcome the opportunity to talk to you about funding this position and bringing this service back to the constituents and animals served by CVAC. Any opportunity for funding such a critical function would be of great interest to the Department and I appreciate your interest. Please feel free to contact me and thank you for your interest in saving the lives of homeless pets in the Coachella Valley, RPM:BW:ld Sincerely, Robert Miller Director Riverside County Community Health Agency DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES - Administrative Offices 6851 Van Buren Blvd. Riverside, California 92509 (951) 358-7387 FAX (95'1) 358-7300 1'DD (951) 358-5124 Tdw°F4Q" COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: C2-1 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines and direct staff to proceed with the design phase of the Highway 111 Median Island Landscape Improvements (Adams Street to Jefferson Street), Project 2009-03. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The median island landscape improvements between Adams Street and Jefferson Street are currently identified and approved for funding within the City's adopted CIP. Funding is available in the amount of $1,321,624 for this work. The available funding is budgeted to come from the Transportation DIF for the purpose of installing landscape, irrigation and lighting improvements. Using the design guidelines as the basis for the design of these items, the estimated cost is $1,000,000. In addition to the installation of the improvements the increase in annual operating cost to maintain the new improvements is estimated to be $6,000 per year. If approved by the City Council the attached design guidelines would be utilized for all new and rehabilitation projects within the Highway 111 corridor. Future public improvements would include rehabilitating the existing median island landscape between the westerly City limits and Adams Street, installing new landscape within the median islands between Adams Street and Jefferson Street, rehabilitating the entry monuments at each end of Highway 111 as well as enhancing the corner landscape and pedestrian crosswalks at each of the major intersections. No funds have been budgeted for future projects at this time. Future private improvements would include improvements to the parkways which would be done as part of new development, redevelopment or when the property owner chooses to make landscape improvements. It is important to note that the design guidelines do not suggest removing and 0273 replacing all of the parkway landscape but rather, enhancing the existing landscape by adding the unique La Quinta landscape identity features. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: The project is fully funded with locally generated development impact fees. The project will be advertised as a non -prevailing wage improvement which may result in a cost savings to the City. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: In 1997, the City established design guidelines to assist with the design of parkway landscaping along the Highway 111 corridor. The guidelines were created in an effort to provide consistency and continuity in landscaping design while also ensuring that such guidelines would not stifle design creativity. Several projects along the corridor were designed and developed in accordance with the guidelines (i.e. Washington Park, Centre at La Quinta and Pavilions). The guidelines also focused upon water efficiency, minimizing nuisance water, creating community identity, providing seasonal color and minimizing maintenance requirements. Highway 111 serves as one of the City's primary "gateway" corridor and serves as the City's core for commercial development. Within the City of La Quinta, Highway 111 extends from the bridge at the City of La Quinta/Indian Wells boundary to Jefferson Street (approximately 2 miles). Caltrans relinquished its interests on Highway 111 within the City of La Quinta in December 2007. The City now has the opportunity to update its' Highway 111 guidelines in order to create a sense of place which identifies the City's unique character. As part of the capital improvement program to complete landscaping in the Highway 111 median islands, it was determined appropriate to revisit the existing design guidelines. The primary objectives were similar to what was identified in 1997, with emphasis upon water efficiency consistent with the current Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and City standards, seasonal color, establishing identifiable character representative of La Quinta, minimizing maintenance requirements and improving views of scenic vistas and commercial establishments. Attached for the. City Council's consideration is the amended Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines (Attachment 1). These design standards are intended to serve as a template for Highway 111 landscape development, as well as, the future rehabilitation of existing parkway planting that front along the highway. The median island design included in these proposed standards will create an example for property owners to refer to when they initially prepare development plans or propose to modify parkway and median improvements. o��r4 With the approval of the proposed design guidelines the City could have a unique, recognizable landscape identity which is not yet evident on Highway 111. The objectives of the guidelines are as follows: 1. Create a unique landscape identity for the Highway 111 corridor which will differentiate La Quinta from other desert cities through the use of iconic "La Quinta" plants, as well as with seasonally flowering trees and shrubs that will be unique to La Quinta. This unique identity will include: a. Pockets of Italian Cypress and seasonally flowering shrubs that imitate the iconic landscape of the La Quinta Hotel. b. Citrus and Date Palms, which are reflective of La Quinta's agricultural heritage. c. New entry monuments, way -finding signage and pedestrian oriented lighting which characterize the California Mission Style architecture prevalent throughout the city. 2. Reduce water consumption while maintaining a sophisticated landscape theme. 3. Reduce the use of turf in new construction and encourage removal of turf during landscape renovations. The addition of artificial turf will be an option, and will be used within the new median islands. 4. Create a recognizable landscape hierarchy which clearly identifies the primary Highway 111 intersections at Washington Street, Adams Street, Dune Palms Road and Jefferson Street over other signalized intersections. 5. Create a way finding sign program which facilitates locating major shopping venues and attractions. 6. Minimize maintenance requirements and provide a set of written guidelines for maintenance of plantings, with the goal of retaining and emphasizing the resort character of La Quinta. 7. Retain existing landscape character and forms where practical. 8. Emphasize that tree plantings at their mature size and location will have precedence over individual building signage. It is understood that monument and way -finding signs are to serve as the primary commercial identification as viewed from Highway 111. V 75 Specific to objectives 1, 5 and 8, the design guidelines have focused upon the balance of creating a unique identity for the corridor that is representative of La Quinta while also considering the ability for those visiting the city's commercial core to visually connect with the shopping centers and anchor tenants lining the corridor. City Council Study Session Review On October 19, 2010, the City Council received a presentation and discussed the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines. Following discussion the City Council provided several key comments to staff. The following is a summary of the comment provided followed by a response and any action taken: • The proposed directional/way finding signs appear to be hard to read and should be designed so the signs are easy to read during the day and at night. The signs should not be designed in a manner that creates an unsafe condition with drivers stressing to read the signs. The directional/way finding signs have been redesigned to allow for a larger area for the sign face. The dimension of the sign face is now presented to be 4' wide by 5' tall. The proposed type face/lettering also increased to 51 /2" which is the same size as the lettering size presented on the Village Way Finding Signage. The directional/way finding signs will be internally illuminated and back lit with LED fixtures. • The Landscape Design Guidelines should create a unique identifiable corridor that does not appear to be cluttered, light standards and fixtures should be uniform at human scale, permanent static vertical features should be included with open areas incorporated. The Landscape Design Guidelines have been adjusted to create a unique landscape identity for the Highway 111 corridor within the City of La Quinta. Iconic "La Quinta" plants, seasonally flowering trees and shrubs, along with artificial turf presented in appropriately selected open space will create this unique identity. • The proposed planter pots are susceptible to vandalism or theft. The proposed icon pots will be a fiberglass composite material that is treated with anti -aging graffiti coating. The proposed pots will be 18" high with a 60" diameter. Once filled with colorful flowing shrubs or accents the pots will be too heavy to move without heavy duty equipment. • The City's entry monument should be same on both the east and west end of the corridor. 011.16 The Landscape Design Guidelines have been amended to recommend updating both of the City Entry Monuments on Highway 1 1 1. • The directional signs are gaudy. The Landscape Design Guidelines have been amended to reflect different choices in the tile treatment of the pedestal base. • The design guidelines should include rocks with color and shape that are indigenous to the area. The Landscape Design Guidelines have been amended to include the use of boulders that are indigenous to the area. • The design guidelines should consider the application of artificial turf where appropriate. The Landscape Design Guidelines have been amended to include the use of artificial where appropriate. Architecture & Landscaping Review Committee At the request of City Council, the City's Architecture & Landscaping Review Committee considered the "Draft" Landscape Design Guidelines at their December 15, 2010 meeting and provided the following comments for City Council consideration: • Western median island needs to have icon, or entrance sign, stating "You are entering La Quinta." • Add citrus trees to the Home Depot entry feature, as well as some tile detail on the tower, possibly in natural colors. • Focus more on (pedestrian scale) light fixtures, rather than bollards, due to maintenance issues. • Consider greater use of L.E.D. and solar light fixtures. • Consider using stamped concrete, in a dark brown color, instead of artificial brick along Highway 1 1 1 . • Use larger than 15-gallan Italian Cypress. • The City's maintenance contract for Highway 111 should be very definitive in its specifications for proper maintenance of the plants, especially the shrubs and cypress, to eliminate "hedging" when these plants are maintained improperly. Also, stated the contractor should be held accountable when the specifications are not followed. • Include the use of more succulents, where possible, in to prevent hedges as previously mentioned. 0277 • State a color for decomposed granite (DG), such as Brimstone or a Desert Gold, instead of Palm Springs Gold, for substantial cost savings. (Palm Springs Gold is only available from a single supplier.) • Minimize real turf and replace with artificial turf, in appropriate locations. • Do not encourage the use of the Pindo Palm variety. • Mow curbing on real turf should be 6 x 6 mow curb with no. 3 rebar, to allow machine installation, for cost savings. • No mow curbing needed where there is synthetic turf with decomposed granite (DG) next to it. • Decomposed granite (DG) shall be wetted and tamped when installed, instead of "wet and rolled." • Consider use of Baja or Dos Rios rock (earth tones), instead of Salt River Rock. • Make sure a sample of the Date Palm is submitted before it is planted. It is staff's belief that the comments received from the Architectural & Landscape Review Committee are consistent with the intent of the amended Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines and that details such as plant spacing, plant size and maintenance concerns can best be addressed during review of the actual landscape improvements plans. If approved by the City Council, the attached Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines will be used as the basis for the development of detailed landscape, irrigation and lighting plans for the median islands on Highway 1 1 1 , between Adams Street and Jefferson Street. Once completed, these medians will serve as the "as built" example for the remainder of the corridor for future development projects and landscape renovation projects. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines and direct staff to proceed with the design phase of the Highway 111 Median Island Landscape Improvements (Adams Street to Jefferson Street), Project 2009-03; or 2. Do not adopt the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines and do not direct staff to proceed with the design phase of the Highway 111 Median Island Landscape Improvements (Adams Street to Jefferson Street), Project 2009-03; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 0278 Respectfully submitted, U� imothy R. Jo as n, P.E. Public Works irector/City Engineer Approved for submission by: Thomas . Genovese, City anager Attachment: 1 . Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines O")IJ ATTACHMENT 1 HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES Prepared for CITY OF LA QUINTA 1128111 Prepared by: RGA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 74020 Alessandro, Suite E Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 568-3624 (760) 773-5615 Fax www.rga-pd.com 0280 Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines HIGHWAY 111 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 OBJECTIVES PAGE 2 PLANT PALETTE NARRATIVE PAGE 3 PLANT PALETTE PAGE 4 PLANT PHOTOS PAGE 5 SCHEMATIC PLAN NARRATIVE PAGE 6 OVERALL SCHEMATIC PLAN PAGE 7 CONCEPTUAL MEDIAN ISLAND — PLAN VIEW PAGE 8 CONCEPTUAL MEDIAN ISLAND — PHOTO SIMULATION PAGE 9 PARKWAY RE -DESIGN — PHOTO SIMULATION PAGE 10 PARKWAY RE -DESIGN — CROSS SECTION PAGE 11 PRIMARY CORNER TREATMENT; PLAN PAGE 12 REVISED ENTRY MONUMENT — PHOTO SIMULATION PAGE 13 PROPOSED WAYFINDING SIGNAGE — CONCEPT & SIMULATION PAGE 14 LIGHTING NARRATIVE PAGE 15-18 LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 19 PARKWAY LIGHTING PHOTO SIMULATIONS PAGE 20 PROPOSED ICON POTS — CONCEPT & SIMULATION PAGE 21 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE NARRATIVE PAGE 22-34 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS PAGE 35 APPENDIX Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines L.. 1 OBJECTIVES These design guidelines are intended to serve as a template for Highway 111 landscape development as well as the rehabilitation of existing landscapes that front along the Highway in La Quinta. The median island design included in these design guidelines will create a built environment in the Highway 111 corridor for property owners to refer to when they prepare their parkway improvements. La Quinta has a unique, recognizable landscape identity which is not yet evident on Highway 111. The existing "core" La Quinta landscape theme will be introduced into the Highway 111 corridor through these objectives: Create a unique landscape identity for the Highway 111 corridor which will differentiate La Quinta from other desert cities through the use of iconic "La Quinta" plants, as well as with seasonally flowering trees and shrubs that will be unique to La Quinta. This unique identity will include: Pockets of Italian Cypress and seasonally flowering shrubs which borrow from the La Quinta Hotel (which is the most iconic La Quinta landscape). b. Citrus and Date Palms, which are reflective of La Quinta's agricultural heritage. c. New entry monuments, wayfinding signage and lighting which characterize the California Mission style architecture prevalent throughout the city. 2. Reduce water consumption while maintaining a sophisticated landscape theme. 3. Prohibit or significantly reduce the use of turf in new construction and encourage removal of turf in landscape renovations. The addition of artificial turf will be an option, and will be illustrated in the new median islands. Create a recognizable landscape hierarchy which clearly identifies the primary Highway 111 intersections at Washington Street, Adams Street, Dune Palms Road and Jefferson Street over other signalized intersections. 5. Create a wayfinding sign program which facilitates locating major shopping venues and attractions. 6. Minimize maintenance requirements and provide a set of written guidelines for maintenance of plantings, with the goal of retaining and emphasizing the resort character of La Quinta. 7. Retain existing landscape character and forms where practical. Emphasize that tree plantings at their mature size and location will have precedence over individual building signage. It is understood that monument and wayfinding signs are to serve as the primary commercial identification as viewed from Highway 111. 0282 Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines PLANT PALETTE This plant palette is an integral element of the La Quinta Highway 111 image. By using the plants listed in the palette, a consistent resort quality character will be emphasized. It is, therefore, very important that all new plants to be installed along Highway 111 be selected from this palette. The deciduous trees on the plant palette are to be used within planting designs so that they are located in the midst of evergreen trees and shrubs which flower while the deciduous tree is defoliated. Plant substitutions will not be allowed without written approval from the City. 0233 Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA HIGHWAY 111 PLANT PALETTE 'kPT b*j':'�%^y'::f ° /ANICALWIME v r .x ` COMMON W1ME : 5 �' 8b CALIPER- - BTANOILR05 LNT MII7URE SREHIW� REMARKS TREES: ACACIA SMALUI SWEET ACACIA 24"BOX ACACIA ANUERA MULGA TREE 24"BOX CITRUS CITRUS 24"BOX VCAL /4'HT 20 X20' CUPRESSUS ARFZONICA ARIZONA CYPRESS 15 GAL-24'BOX PARKINSONIA'DESERT MUSEUM' OR -AZT THORNLESS PALO VERDE HYBRIDS 24"BOX 1"CAL /T HT 30'X 30' MULTI PARKINSONIA PRAECOX SONORAN PALO VERDE 24"BOX 1"CAL T HT 30'%30' MULTULOW BRANCH STANDARD PALMS: BUTIA CAPITATA PINDO PALM 24"BOX 24"BTH MIN 10,X 10, 24"BTH MIN BRAHEA ARMATA MEXICAN BLUE PALM 24"BOX 24"BTH MIN 5-15'X 540' 24'BTH MIN CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM 24"BOX TA'CLUMP 5-20'X5-15' MULTI PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA DATE PALM 20-W HTS 49 X 15' SHOVEL CUT WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 6-16 HTS 6tl X 15, SKINNED WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM 3-16 HTS 1W X 10' SKINNED ACCENT PLANTS: AGAVE SPECIES AGAVE 5-15 GAL 35X36 CUPRESSUS S.'STRICTA' ITALIAN CYPRESS 15 GAL-24'BOX 15 GAL5-T HT 24'19-11'HT MAX W OF TOTAL TO BE 15 GAL DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON 5-15 GAL 1 6X5' ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 12 IT DIA 2 X 2 FOUQUIERIA SPELENDENS OCOTILLO 6HIT 10CANE MIN OPUNTIA BASILARIS BEAVER TAIL CACTUS 7HT 10 PAD MIN 7X6' SHRUBS: CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA RED BIRD OF PARADISE 5GAL 6-19X6-0tl CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 5GAL 46'X5' CASSIA SPECIES SENNA 5GAL 68'%8-1tl CHAMELAUCIUM SPECIES WAX FLOWER 5GAL C. U. DANCING QUEEN- LAVENDER AND PINK DANCING QUEEN 5GAL 6X6' C. CILIATUM'SCADDAN'-WHITE SCADDAN 5GAL 3'X4' C. MY SWEET SIXTEEN - RED AND WHITE SWEET SIXTEEN 5GAL 55 X55' DALEA PULCHRA INDIGO BUSH 5GAL 5'X5' EREMOPHILA SPECIES EMU BUSH E. VALENTINE VALENTINE 5GAL 4'X45' E.WINTERGOLD WINTERGOLD 5GAL 45'X6 E. SUMMERTIME BLUE SUMMERTIME BLUE 5GAL 1656 E PINK BEAUTY PINK BEAUTY 5GAL 6A'X6-9' DALEA SPECIES D. SIERRA GOLD SIERRA GOLD 5GAL B'X3' D. FRUTESCENS BLACK DALEA 5 GAL 4' X 5' HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA REDYUCCA 5GAL 4'X3' JUSTICIA CALIFORNICA CHUPAROSA SEAL 6%12' LAVENDULA SPECIES L. STOECHAS SPANISH LAVENDER SPANISH LAVENDER SCAT. 3' X 3' L DENTATA FRENCH LAVENDER FRENCH LAVENDER 5GAL 3' X 3' LEUCOPHYLLUM SPECIES TEXAS RANGER L. CIMMARON CIMMARON 5GAL 3'X3' L. THUNDERCLOUD THUNDERCLOUD 5GAL 3'X3' L. LYNN'S LEGACY LYNINS LEGACY 5 GAL S X 5' L. LAEVIGATUM CHIHUHAN SAGE 5GAL 4'X 5' ROSEMARINUS OFFICINAUS ROSEMARY'TUSCAN' 5GAL 35'%35' SALVIA SPECIES S LEUCANTHA MEXICAN SAGE 5GAL 4'X4 S. CLEVELANDII CLEVELAND SAGE 5GAL 4'X4' S. GREGGII AUTUMN SAGE 5GAL 3'XX INERT MATERIAL: DESERT GOLD DECOMPOSED GRANITE MINIMUM 2" THICK, WETTED AND COMPACTS ANGULAR GRANITE BOULDERS INDI ENOUS BOULDER -SURFACE ELE T GRADE. CONCRETE MOWSTRIP CONCRETE BY LM SCHOFIELD. COLOR TO BE LA QUINTA QUARRY RED OR EQUAL. SEE CITY OF LQ STANDARD PLAN 720 (SEE APPENDIX). 4 WV. v 0 i OVERALL SCHEMATIC PLAN AND ENLARGEMENTS The following plan provides an overall view of Highway 111 in La Quinta and also acts as a reference map for the more detailed illustrations included in these guidelines. The plan indicates the location of primary intersections and wayfinding signage and establishes the extent of the medians and parkways covered by the guidelines. The enlargements referenced on the plan include: • Conceptual median island, plan view and photo simulation • Parkway redesign, photosimulation and cross section • Primary corner treatment, plan view • City entry monument, redesign, photosimulation and cross section • Proposed wayfinding signage and photosimulation • Parkway lighting and day and night photosimulations Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 5 (!\ �!]( � q§)qƒ jje Rggg ge! �• •r !M-1 ;] ,|� (|,! .: §)[ ! WIN m 1q©! §\) k ) 0288 i a ro Pa Iw� W V 0 V a �I 028 L d Q d Q w IM ON 0291 c .a O . E c c cu � = O O W m O C U D O >N O > cu �- _I Lw SM 8 4-1 13 II1*4 U C uO o ✓ .O 10 i J c E r •X p o to N N _ o c 'hYYtl'WrbY9d' O a% rr n 000 a °c � a v Q 10294 LIGHTING NARRATIVE The lighting included with these guidelines is for accent plant material and to provide illumination of sidewalks, wayfinding and entry signs. This lighting is low maintenance, energy conserving and in accord with the dark sky ordinance. There are two types of lights included in these guidelines: A. Accent Lights Accent lights are installed flush with grade and include a half shield to control glare. Accent lights are for illumination of selected plant material, such as palms and specimen plants and signage. Accent lights shall be Kim "Light Vault" LTV71 (see attached specification sheets). Two lights per palm and canopy tree; one per accent. B. Pole Mounted Lights Pole lights are intended to illuminate walkways. The lights are 12 feet tall, as measured from grade to the top of the lamp fixture. Pole lights shall be Sternberg E350LED fixtures post -mounted, with one fixture per post. Each fixture shall have an output of 1970 lumens and 34 watts with a frosted lens (see attached specification sheets). Spacing will be a minimum of 50' o.c., alternate sides of walk. 02y� Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 14 IaM UGHTDIG Type: Job: Fixture Catalog number: Lightvaule LTV71 120 / 277Volt Composite Housing / 18 watt LED revision 8/3/09 - Ih,71.lxdf Fixture Options: Approvals: I 'ft"r nbda Option rn.'emd arsrmh.'eil Ordm:A cryumtrly brim Gmrae Date: with6Vnre 5� rop, 2 Page- 1 of 3 Specifications Lens Ring: Cast bronze with natural finish. (optional brushed stainless steel lens ring is also available.) right captive 5/*' blackened stainless steel hex -socket cap screws. Lens: Tempered clear soda linite, She thick flush with lens ring, slightly cnnvncd. Lens Gasket One-piece molded silicone, U-channel wraps completely around lens flange. Composite Housing: High temperature, compression rinolclerl fiberglass impregnated, 3/-a min. wall conrI(x15ite. Charcoal gray. No top lip to tnp dirt and moisture. Molded -in solid brass knurled inserts to receive socket base screw5. Separate driver and splice compartments, individual cast aluminum internal covers, wth silicone gaskets. Two 3/a' NPT in bottom, 24 cu. in. splice area. Body and driver modules epoxy bonded. Optical System: 18 LED emitters configured in a circular array, mounted on yoke providing ±150 vertical adjustment and 3400 horizontal rotation, Imking screws. Available in "Cool White" (approx. 5000+K). LED Driver. 2 electronic dwa rs, rated 12 watt and 6 watt. Available in 120V input. -401. starling temperature. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized. Wiring: Anti -siphon barrier on wiring to and from splice compartment. All components wire linked for ground, quick-elisctnnect for removal of optical system. Distribution: SPLON 'Sr' for spot distributon.; specify "NF" for narrow flood distrihttion. 9 nth '• i�B!m� nail^,�� I.9n,a © Grade �— 340° Optical Adjustment c (2) 3W NPT emm�l --- 10' Dih _ iatnmei i 1 i.uur<i'` a ill w NIIEmI IgRKRL tQ1T1 ORDERING INFORMATION Fixture Mode ❑ LTV7ISP / 18LED120 ❑ LTV7ISP 118LED277 Fixture Mode O LTV71NF 118LED120 ❑ LTV71NF I 18LED277 16 LED 277 ,TT Tom^ Lamp Watts Lamp Tyrm Lm Volts LED : Light Emitting Daces Wattage I Max Amps 18W / .2 18W / .09 Wattage I Max Amps 18W / .2. 18W / .09 18 Emitters LED 18 Watt �"— Listings and Ratings UL cUL 1598' IP68 Rated � 25C Ambient 'suitable (or wet locations KIMUGWP1n PESOPcS W Pnl1T iOGHNJGE SFECiMAiIi-&Vn' iouT NO710E ® 2009 KIM LIGHTING • PO BOX 6WISO. CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL, 626MB-5656 - FAX 62W69.2695 S617609215 0296 15 lam UGHTfiNG Lightvault' LW71 120 / 277Volt Composite Housing / 18 watt LED revision B13/09 • Ih,74-if Type: Job: Page: 2 of 3 17 Optional Features Brushed Stainless One-piece standard brushed stainless steel replaces Steel Lens Ring standard lens ring. includes glass lens gasket and mounting -- Cat. No. ElSS50 screws, g:-® ❑ SS60 (AssaNtledi May be ordered separately. To order assembled with fixture, add ❑ No Option to fixture Cat No. - Example: LTV71/xxWoo ootxlSS60 Half Shield Lens ring for directional glare control toward the viewer. One - bronze, replaces standard lens ring. Includes glass Cat. No. El HS60 piece cast 9. ❑HS50 (AssernblaM lens gasket and m venting screws. No Option / 'r_CVY Rock Guard Lens ring for lens protection in vandal prone areas. Cat. No. ❑ RG60 One-piece cast bronze. replaces standard lens ring. Includes ❑ RG60 glass lens gasket and mounting screws. ❑ No Option May be ordered separately. To order assembled with fixture, add to fixture Cat No. - Example: LTWlM20/RG50. =e5 Replaces standard lens ring. r_ Trim Ring For hush mounting of fixture in concrete pad or pawing. Brass Cat. No. ❑ TR50 ring clamps to housing with stainless steel screw. 1.1 No Option 1 -+ 9'/.' Din I- GIa 5mi Photocell Sensor Built-in photocell sensor is mounted in the center of the LLD board. Consult factory for environment Cat. No. ❑ A-PC2 limitations and operation settin6 . ❑ No Option NOTE: Available for LED modal LTV711120. Colored LEDs Consult factory for color options. 0? 02009 KIM LIGHTING - Ro BOX 60060, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626l966&5666 -FAX 62M69Q695 97 16 Lightvault`' LTWI 120 / 277 Volt Composite Housing / 18 watt LED MM UC&ffwG revision 1113tt19 • Itv71.Pdf Type: Job: Page: 3 of 3 Optional Features o- a Colored Lenses Cat. No. {See right) ❑ No Option Lens Accessories Cat. No. (See right) 0 No Option Molded colored glass lens, replaces standard clear glass lens in fixture. (See color samples on page 26 of Lightvault catalog.) May be used in combination with HL hex cell Louvers, Si -spread or PL prismatic lenses. Cat. No. Color Description 0RT50 Rose Warms metal halide color. Deepens high pressure sodium color to pink/orange. ❑AM60 Amber Warms metal halide color. Deepens high pressure sodium color to yellow/orange. ❑ RD60 Red Deep color accent_ Best used with high pressure sodium lamps. ❑ BF60 Blue Deep color accent Best used with metal halide lamps. U GR60 Green I t color accent. Blue shift with metal halide lamps. Yellow shift with high pressure sodium lamps. HL - Hex Cell Louver. Constructed of hex cell aluminum louvers faith a cell dimension of '!+" W x ''A" D, pmducin6, a 450 cutoff angle, mounted in a circular frame, finished in baked high -heat Flat black, May be used in combination with colored lenses. Inserts behind lens into lens gasket. Not for use in combination with SL spread or PL prismatic lenses. Cat. No. ❑ HL50 Hex Cell Louver PL - Prismatic Lens: Softens lamp distribition. Best with Floccl lamps. Inserts behind lens into lens gasket. Not for use in combination with HL50 louver. Cat. No. [1 PL60 Prismatic Lens St. - Spread Lens: Creates an oval beam pattern. Best with spot lamps. Inserts behind lens into lens gasket. Not for use in combination with HL50 louver. O Cat. No. ❑ SL60 Spread Lens 02909 NIM LIGHTING • PO BOX R486, CITY OF INDUSTRY. CA 91716-0080 - TEL 626M68-5rA 6 • FAX 626r369-2695 ml ro wle 0298 17 IF-7s3 qcC*TERNBE'MG Architectural Luminaires LUMINAIRE DESIGN • The luminaire shall be a medium scale_ architectural design fixture provided with LED light sources and roof mounted, down -lighting optics. • The luminaire shall be 17"diameter and 26 t/2" overall height. • The luminaire shall be supplied with line -ground, line -neutral and neutral -ground electrical surge protec- tion in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 guidelines. • The luminaire shall be U.L. or E.T.L. listed in U.S. and Canada. • The E350 is available with or without Flat or sag lens. • The F,360 is ofTered with a clear or frosted acrylic, tapered cylindrical body lens. POST FITTER • The fitter shall be heavy wall, cast aluminum for high tensile strength. • The titter shall have an inside diameter opening sized to fit a 3" round pole or tenon. • The fitter shall secure to the pole or tenon with set- screws. DRIVER • The LED driver shall be securely mounted inside the fixture roof for optimized driver performance and longevity. • The LED driver shall be supplied with a quick -dis- connect electrical connector on the power supply, pro- viding easy power connections and fixture installation. 36OLED E36OLEDFA LIGHT SOURCES • The luminaire shall use high output, high brightness LEDs. • The LEDs shall he mounted in arrays, on printed circuit boards designed to maximize heat transfer to the heat ,rink surface. • The LEDs shall be attached to the printed circuit board with not less than 90% pure silver to insure optimal electrical and thermal conductivity. • The LEDs and printed circuit boards shall be protected from moisture and corrosion by a cont'ormal coating or I to 3 mils. • The LEDs and printed circuit board construction shall be environmentally friendly and 100% recyclable. They shall not contain lead, mercury or any other hazardous substances and shall be RoHS compliant. • The LED life rating data shall be determined in accordance with IESNA LM-80-08. LIST NO. OPTICS E35EL LED EU. The lumiishall b nare e provided with individual acrylic reracor, y tics applied to LED RO P ry' refractor. type optics PP SERIES each LED. opaansl D ffu Lena Malta* LED Red Moe@ea ova' Open Bow Peal w Ann Flier 3'KvFA LED Roof Mawtert Opaq Frosted or Clean BWI Lens Arm Fates Y S:pId 0r'r0r9 HUP ONA a 0 V 0 8 R 0300 0 =°=o _ O 0 3° o o H ` C N - N ch ° 3m'�o a,Em`° E � _N s° N V y N N O o -a V O 2 4 IF O 2 E E a N N ° c °�� U °oays�_u,rn = m rn o V aEi ° " 3 n O O) 6 p _O 'O G Tn cO) `0E� V �°� ooa2)oo 3 d 1: V H Y 00 V o c 3 s �2 ao a off, Cn -0 �m�og� 02oH0005Q3 -O N _ O w 6 N os=U E C a� ° o rnr- yU- o° O a o ;,O o o cs E N �H U.G V _ 70 V H �n-OQ-9 0 a e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03A LANDSCAPE / MAINTENANCE NARRATIVE Good landscape maintenance is essential to the integrity of the resort character of Highway 111. These landscape maintenance guidelines will keep the irrigation system functioning efficiently, the plant material properly pruned, the view corridor free from debris and, most importantly, keep the resort quality of the landscape intact. Part of the resort quality in the landscape is the selective use of shrub masses. The shrubs located in the median islands are not to be hedged, and should not be trimmed with power hedge trimmers. Shrub masses located in the parkways will not be hedged unless that was the original design intent. Shrubs which are not part of a hedge will not be trimmed with power hedge trimmers, nor will they be trimmed into geometric shapes, as the intent of the landscape theme is to maintain the natural form of shrubs and ground cover. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 21 0302 MAINTENANCE STANDARDS 1.01 PART 1 - GENERAL This section describes parameters for permanent maintenance of the landscape. Insurance. Licenses, Permits The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall possess all insurance, licenses and permits required to perform the landscape maintenance. A. Licensing Requirements In accordance with Division Il, Chapter 9 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California, providing for the licensing of contractors, the Contractor shall possess a valid C-27 landscape maintenance license or Class A Contractor's license. In addition, the Contractor shall possess a valid chemical applicator's license to include pest control or must subcontract to a licensed contractor. 1.02 SCOPE OF WORK These specifications establish the standard for maintenance of the landscaping along the Highway 111 corridor in the City of La Quinta. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, tools, services and special skills required to perform the landscape maintenance as set forth in these specifications and in keeping with the highest standard of quality and performance. Maintenance of these areas shall include maintenance of plant materials and irrigation system. Maintenance of plant materials shall include, but is not limited to, mowing, trimming and edging, pruning, fertilization, aeration, weed control, cultivation, pest control, tree surgery, thatching and plant replacement. It is the intent of these specifications to provide plant material maintenance methods to keep the site in a state of growth and repair. Irrigation maintenance shall include system operation adjustment and all necessary repairs needed to keep system operation at peak efficiency. A. Emergency Numbers The Contractor shall provide to the City, at all times throughout the duration of their contract, emergency telephone numbers which can be called for emergency conditions at any time that the Contractor's representatives are not immediately available at the job site. An alternative number shall be provided in case no answer is received at the first number. The emergency number shall be used to contact a responsible representative of the Contractor who can take the necessary action required to alleviate an emergency condition which threatens to cause damage to any property. PART 2 - EXECUTION 2.01 TURF GRASS AREAS (Where they occur) A. Mowing Mowing of lawn areas shall be done once a week, except when weather precludes mowing. Bermuda grass shall be mowed at a cutting height of 3/4" - 1". Rye grass shall be mowed at a cutting height of 1-1/2" - 2". Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 22 0303 A power driven rotary mower with a grass catcher attached to remove clippings shall be used to mow turf. Blades shall be kept sharp at all times. B. Edging and Trimming Edging shall be accomplished with a power edger each time the turf is mowed. Clippings shall either be vacuumed or blown off walks. The turf around tree wells, sprinkler heads and other objects shall be trimmed by hand clippers or a power weedeater. (Contractor to provide weedeater guard on all trees when weedeaters are used.) Chemicals may be used for this purpose only with the approval of the City Maintenance Engineer. C. Aerification Turf grass shall be aerified once a year during the first week of August, one week prior to fertilization. Aerate all turf areas, removing 1/2"x2" cores of sod with an aerator machine at a maximum of 6" spacing. Any areas that show excessive compaction shall receive additional treatment as required to alleviate this condition and allow for proper water penetration and minimal runoff. At the discretion of the Contractor, the cores may either be dragged to break them up or removed. D. Fertilization Apply fertilizers as indicated in Fertilization Section 2.05 of these specifications. E. Watering A regular deep watering program shall be accomplished to give the best results. The established turf should not be kept wet but should dry out somewhat between waterings. Allow lawns to dry before mowing. Thatching (only if not overseeding) Thatch all Bermuda lawns once a year in early September in accordance with the following methods: 1. Verticut entire area using a thatching machine set to soil line conduct. Verticut twice in parallel directions. Pick up debris at the completion of this operation. 2. Mow with rotary mower at regular cutting height. G. Overseeding of Perennial Rye In mid -October (or when the evenings are consistently cool), the following overseeding services should be performed: Perennial rye to be applied at a rate of 20 pounds per 1,000 square feet. 15-15-15 fertilizer to be applied per manufacturer's recommendations. H. Refurbishment of Turf Areas Lawn areas that thin out due to shading effect of maturing trees, or dying back due to sogginess, will be reseeded with an approved grass seed to restore thinning areas. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 23 0304 Weed Control Contractor shall maintain a weed -free lawn at all times by either chemical, mechanical means or by the water management program. The Contractor shall be especially careful if applying chemicals to control weeds because of possible damage to the lawn. Before such applications are made, the turf should be well established and in a vigorous condition. J. Disease Harmful Insects and Rodent Control Maintain areas free of pest and diseases including rodents, snails, insects, etc. See Sections C, D and E of the Additional Work in All Areas section. 2.02 ADDITIONAL WORK IN ALL AREAS A. Standard Practices for Trees Shrubs and Other Woody Plant Maintenance/Pruning ANSI A300 (6-30-93) 1. Trees shall be pruned to reduce hazards, improve structure, maintain natural aesthetics, maintain health or satisfy a specific need such as: Removing diseased, dead, dying, decayed, interfering and obstructing branches. Before pruning, the primary objective should be carefully defined. a. The purpose of utility pruning is to remove branches in order to prevent loss of service, present damage to equipment, avoid impairment and to uphold the intended safe usage of the utility space. b. The purpose of pruning trees other than for utility purposes is to provide hazard reduction, maintenance, aesthetic pruning or specialty pruning as defined in this standard. 2. To obtain the defined objective, the growth cycles of individual species as well as the type of pruning to be performed should be considered. 3. Before beginning to work and while work is being performed, a qualified Arborist shall visually inspect each tree for structural and plant health problems. If a condition is observed that requires additional attention, the person doing the inspection should inform an immediate supervisor or the tree owner of such conditions in writing. 4. Tools used in making pruning cuts shall be kept sharpened to result in final cuts with a smooth surface and secure remaining adjacent bark. a. Anvil -type pruning tools shall not be used to prune either trees or shrubs. When using a hook and blade -type hand pruner, lopper or pole pruner, the hook portion of the cutting head should be positioned on the outside portion of the branch to be removed. b. The use of climbing spurs is not an acceptable work practice for pruning operations on live trees. Climbing spur use is permissible on tree removals and in emergencies where an aerial rescue must be performed. Use of climbing spurs is a generally acceptable work practice for pruning operations on certain palm species and trees where limbs are greater than throw -line distance apart and only when alternative methods for accessing the crown are impractical. Climbing spurs should be removed when the climber has ascended and tied into the tree. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 24 0305 C. Equipment and work practices that will damage the bark and cambium should be avoided. 5. When removing a lateral branch at its point of origin on the trunk or parent limb, the final pruning cut shall be made in branch tissue as close as possible to the trunk or parent limb, without cutting into the branch collar or leaving a protruding stub of branch tissue. a. When reducing the top or length of a branch, prune to a lateral branch at least one-half the diameter of the portion being removed. The cut should approximately bisect the angle formed by the branch bark ridge and an imaginary line perpendicular to the lateral branch cut line. b. Before a branch is reduced, the ratio of live wood in the branch to leaf surface should be considered carefully. Generally, not more than one-third the total leaf surface area of any branch should be removed. C. When removing a dead branch, the final cut shall be made just outside the collar of live tissue. If the collar has grown out along the branch stub, only the dead stub should be removed. The live collar shall remain intact an uninjured. d. To prevent damage to the parent limb when removing a small branch or branch with a tight crotch, the final cut should be made from the bottom of the branch up. e. Tree branches shall be removed in such a manner to not cause damage to other parts of the tree or to other plants or property. All branches too large to support with one hand shall be precut to avoid splitting or tearing of the bark. Where necessary, ropes or other equipment should be used to lower large branches or stubs to the ground. f. All cut limbs shall be removed from the crown upon completion of the pruning. Under no condition shall any severed or partially cut branch be left in the canopy of a tree after the tree worker leaves the job site. 6. Wound dressings and tree paints are not recommended for routine use when pruning, except when specified by the Arborist or Landscape Architect for disease, borer, mistletoe, sprout control, or cosmetic reasons. a. If wound dressings or paints are used for cosmetic or other reasons, then materials non -toxic to the cambium layer shall be used, and only a light coating shall be applied to the wound surface. Asphalt base coatings shall not be placed on tree wounds. b. When tracing bark wounds, a qualified person shall remove only damaged or loose bark, disturbing a minimal amount of live tissue. C. Cavities shall not be filled or treated if the boundary reaction zones are disturbed. 7. Pruning of trees shall only be performed under the supervision of an Arborist by qualified tree workers, who through related training and/or on the job experience, are familiar with the practices and hazards of arboriculture, and the equipment used in such operations. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 25 0306 a. This standard shall not take precedence over safe work practices. b. All applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), American National Standards, such as ANSI Z-133, as well as state and local regulations shall be complied with. 8. Tree/Shrub Pruning Types: a. The following pruning types are the general categories of pruning used on all species of trees. The user should include one or several of these types at any time an any particular tree or trees or any part of a tree, depending on the desired results. 1). Hazard Reduction Pruning. Hazard reduction pruning is recommended when the primary goal is to reduce the danger to a specific target caused by visible defined hazards in a tree. This pruning shall consist of the removal of dead, diseased, obstructing, split and/or broken branches 2 inches (5.0 cm) in diameter or greater. The removal of such described branches is to include those inside the crown of the tree. Limbs susceptible to failure from dense or heavy foliar masses should be thinned. 2). Maintenance Pruning. Maintenance pruning is recommended when the primary goal is emphasis on Hazard Reduction Pruning, tree health and structure. Maintenance pruning shall consist of the removal of dead, dying, diseased, interfering, obstructing, split and broken branches and girdling roots. The removal of such described branches is to include those within the crown of the tree one inch in diameter or greater (2.5 cm). 3). Aesthetic Pruning. Aesthetic pruning is recommended when the primary goal is emphasis on maintenance pruning, tree health, structure and overall appearance. Aesthetic pruning shall consist of the removal of dead, dying, diseased, interfering, obstructing, split and broken branches 1/2 inch (1.25 cm) in diameter or greater. Selective thinning may also be accomplished within the entire tree or any specific branch, as needed. The main difference between maintenance and aesthetic pruning is that the branch diameter to be removed is smaller, thus a much finer job, and selective thinning is incorporated. 4). Shrub Pruning. All non -hedge shrubs, free standing shrubs, and desert plants (Desert Spoon, Texas Ranger, etc.), shall be trimmed selectively by hand. Gas powered trimmers are prohibited from use on shrubs. b. Specialty Pruning: 1). Crown Reduction or Crown Shaping. Consideration should be given to the ability of a species to sustain this type of pruning. Crown reduction is the reduction of the top, sides or individual limbs by the means of removal of the longest portion of a limb to a lateral no less than 1/2 of the total diameter of the original limb or no more than 1/3 of the leaf surface. In most cases, Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 26 one of the 3 previously mentioned pruning types will accompany this procedure. 2). Crown Cleaning. Crown cleaning shall consist of one or more of the following items: dead, dying, or diseased branches, weak branches and watersprouts. 3). Crown Raising. Crown Raising shall consist of the removal of the lower branches of a tree to provide clearance. 4). Crown Restoration. Crown restoration pruning should improve the structure, form and appearance of trees which have been severely headed or vandalized. 5). Crown Thinning. Crown thinning shall consist of the selective removal of branches to increase light penetration, air movement, and reduce weight. 6). Vista Pruning. Vista pruning consists of primary and selective thinning to allow a specific view of an object from a predetermined point. 9. Young Tree Pruning: a. At Planting. When a young tree is planted, the following material shall be removed: All deadwood, any broken or split branches, in addition to any branches that are competing with the leader. Develop a central trunk or leader by removing double or multiple leaders and vigorously growing upright branches competing with the leader. b. Between three and four years. At this tree growth stage, begin the development of a strong scaffold branches structure by identifying the primary scaffold branches. To make improvement to the structure, remove branches which are crossing or interfering with the scaffold branches. These scaffold branches should be properly spaced. For deciduous shade trees which will reach or exceed 40 feet in height at maturity, the recommended spacing between primary scaffold branches is about 18 inches. For smaller species, 6 to 8 inches should be the recommended spacing. C. Between five and seven years. During the juvenile growth stage, the following woody plant tissue should be removed to continue the development of good structurally sound scaffold branch system with a central trunk/leader. All dead, interfering, split, and broken branches should be removed. Branches with narrow angles shall be removed from the trunk or canopy. Lower branches shall be raised (under - clearance) so as not to interfere with human needs where appropriate. 10. Utility Pruning. The purpose of utility pruning is to remove branches in order to prevent the loss of service, prevent damage to equipment, avoid impairment and to uphold the intended safe usage of the utility space. a. Due to the specialized nature of pruning trees near electric utility lines, only a qualified line clearance tree trimmer or qualified line clearance Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 2 03J8 tree trimmer trainee should be assigned to line clearance work as per ANSI Z133.1, 29 CFR 1910.331-335, 29 CFR 1910.268, and/or 29 CFR 1910.269 (publication pending). Utility Crown Reduction Urban/Residential Environment 1). Urban/residential pruning cuts should be made according to Section 2.03.A hereof. 2). A minimum number of cuts should be made to accomplish the purpose of utility pruning. The natural shape of the tree should be considered. 3). Trees directly under and growing into the facility/utility should be pruned by removing entire branches or by removing branches that have sprouts growing into or, once pruned, will grow into the facility/utility space. 4). Trees growing along the side and growing into or toward the facility/utility space should be pruned by removing entire branches. Branches that, when cut, will produce sprouts that would grow into facilities and/or utility space should be removed. 5). Limbs should not be cut at the edge of a pre -established clearing limit. That is, all cuts should be made a nodes. Cuts at the top of branches between nodes should be avoided. C. Utility Crown Reduction Pruning Remote/Rural Environment 1). Utilities must often maintain facilities/corridors at remote locations in forests. The trees in these locations are not usually considered as individual specimens but rather have value by being part of a whole forest. In such locations, it may be appropriate to use a mechanical pruning method. 2). Cuts should be made close to the main stem, outside of the branch bark collar. 3). Precautions should be taken to avoid stripping or tearing of bark or excessive wounding. 11. Emergency Service Restoration During a declared emergency, utilities must restore service as quickly as possible in accordance with ANSI Z133.1, 29 CFR 1910.331-335, 29 CFR 1910,268 and/or 29 CFR 1910.269 (publication pending). At such times it may be necessary, because of safety and the urgency of service restoration, to deviate from the use of proper pruning techniques as defined in this standard. Following the declared emergency, corrective pruning should be done as necessary. 12. Referenced ANSI These standards are intended to be used with the following American National Standards. When these referenced standards are superseded by a Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 2 0309 revision approved by the American National Standards Institute, Inc., the revision shall apply: ANSI Z133.1 For Tree Care Operations - Pruning, Trimming, Repairing, Maintaining, and Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush - Safety Requirements. 13. Referenced Federal Regulations. a. Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 29 CFR 1910.331-335, subpart S - Electrical Safety -Related Work Practices. b. Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 29 CFR 1910.269 Telecommunications. C. Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 29 SFR 1910.269, Electrical Safety -Related Work Practices (publication pending). 14. Appendixes/Glossary of Terms ANVIL -TYPE PRUNER - Pruning tool which has a sharp blade which cuts onto an anvil -type metal cutting surface. (See Hook and Blade -Type Pruners.) ARBORIST - A professional possessing the technical competence through experience and related training to provide for or supervise the management of trees and other woody plants in the residential, commercial and public landscape. BOUNDARY REACTION ZONE - A separating boundary between wood present at the time of wounding and wood that continues to form after wounding. BRANCH - A secondary shoot or stem arising from one of the main axes (i.e., trunk or leader) of a tree or woody plant. BRANCH COLLAR - Trunk tissue that forms around the base of a branch between the main stem and the branch. As a branch decreases in vigor or begins to die, the branch collar becomes more pronounced. BRANCH SIZE - A minimum or maximum diameter size of branches to be removed should be specified in all pruning operations. This establishes how much pruning is to be done. BRANCH BARK RIDGE - Raised area of bark in the branch crotch that marks where the branch wood and trunk wood meet. CALLUS - Tissue formed by the cambium layer around a wood site. CAMBIUM - Dividing layer of plant cells that forms sapwood (xylem) to the inside and bark (phloem) to the outside. CLIMBING SPURS - A sharp pointed devise affixed to the climbers leg used to assist in climbing (aka gaffs, hooks, spurs, spikes, climbers). CLOSURE - The process of wound -wood covering a cut or other tree wound. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 2 O31Q CROTCH - The point of attachment between a branch and another branch, leader or trunk of a woody plant. CUT - The exposed wood area resulting from the removal of a branch. DECAY - Degradation of woody tissue as caused by certain biological organisms. FACILITY - Equipment or structures used to deliver, or provide protection for the delivery of an essential service such as electricity. FALSE CROTCH - Loops of rope or a pulley device used to support a load - line or a climbing line. GIRDLING ROOTS - Roots located above or below ground whose circular growth around the base of the trunk or over individual roots applies pressure to the bark area, ultimately restricting sap flow and trunk/root growth, frequently resulting in reduced vitality of the plant. HEARTWOOD - The inactive xylem (wood) that provides structural support; found beneath the sapwood. HOOK AND BLADE PRUNER - Pruning tool which has a sharpened blade which overlaps a supporting hook (see Anvil -Type Pruners). LATERAL - A branch or twig growing laterally from the parent branch or stem. LEADER - A dominant upright stem, usually the main trunk. There can be several leaders in one tree. LIMB - Same as branch, but usually larger and more permanent. MYCELIUM - Mass of fungus tissue growth, often found under bark or in rotted wood. OBSTRUCTING - To hinder, block, close off, or be in the way of; to hinder or retard a desired effect or shape. QUALIFIED TREE WORKER - A worker who, through related training on-the-job experience, is familiar with the hazards of pruning, trimming, repairing, maintaining, or removing trees, with the equipment used in such operations, and has demonstrated ability in the performance of the special techniques involved. QUALIFIED TREE WORKER TRAINEE - Any worker undergoing on-the-job training who, in the course of such training, is familiar with the hazards of pruning, trimming, repairing, maintaining, or removing trees with the equipment used in such operations, and has demonstrated ability in the performance of the special techniques involved. Such trainees shall be under the direct supervision of qualified personnel. REMOTE/RURAL - Areas associated with very little human activity. SAPWOOD - The active xylem (wood) that stores and transports water and stores carbohydrates; a wood layer of variable thickness found immediately inside the cambium, comprised of water -conducting vessels and living plant cells. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 30 0311 SHALL - As used in this standard, denotes a mandatory requirement. SHOULD - As used in this standard, denotes an advisory recommendation. TARGET - A person, structure or object which could sustain damage from the failure of a tree or portion of a tree. THINNING - The removal of branches to open up or reduce the crown. TRACING - Shaping a wound by removing loose bark from in and around a wound, usually resulting in an elliptical shape with no pointed apex. URBAN/RESIDENTIAL - Locations normally associated with human activity such as densely populated areas including public and private property. UTILITY - An entity that delivers a public service such as electricity and communication. UTILITY SPACE - The physical area occupied by the utility's facilities and the additional space required to assure its operation. WOUND - The opening that is created any time the tree's protective bark covering is penetrated, cut, or removed, injuring or destroying living tissue. Pruning a live branch creates a wound, even when the cut is properly made. XYLEM - Wood tissue; usually, active xylem is called sapwood, inactive xylem is called heartwood. B. Loss or Damage to Plant Material by Contractor Shrubs, trees and plants damaged or killed due to the Contractor's operations, negligence or chemicals, shall be replaced at no cost to the Owner. C. Disease and Harmful Insect Control Monthly inspections shall be made for evidence of disease and/or harmful insects. If evidence of such is found, a report shall immediately be submitted to the Landscape Architect. The report shall include: Exact location(s) where disease and/or harmful insects are prevalent. 2. Contractor's opinion of the type of disease and/or insect. 3. Contractor's recommendations for control and elimination of disease and/or harmful insects. D. Pest Prevention and Control The Contractor shall be responsible for detection, prevention, elimination and control of diseases, harmful insects and weeds in the turf, shrubs, trees and groundcover areas. The Contractor shall select and supply proper materials and licensed personnel and obtain necessary permits to comply with all city, county, state and federal regulations or laws. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 31 0312 2. Contractor will assume responsibility and liability for the use of all chemical controls. Pests and diseases to include, but not limited to, all insects, mites and other harmful organisms. 3. Chemical controls to include necessary use of herbicides and plant growth regulators. Mechanical means, as well as chemicals may control pests. E. Rodent Control The Contractor shall be required to hire, as subcontractor, a professional who is in business strictly for the purpose of controlling rodents. The Contractor shall be responsible for overseeing the subcontractor to assure the control of all rodents, as required in all landscaped areas. Clean Uv 1. The Contractor shall be responsible for keeping the entire area, including hardscape areas, free of debris such as papers, bottles, cans, glass, dirt, etc. Debris shall be removed Monday, Wednesday and Friday of each week. The Contractor shall be responsible for trash removal from the sites. 2. Contractor shall remove all debris resulting from the maintenance operations and dispose of it off -site. All grass clippings deposited on roadways or walks shall be picked up after each mowing or trimming operation. 3. All debris resulting from any of the Contractor's operations shall be removed and disposed of legally at the Contractor's expense. No debris will be allowed to remain at the end of the workday. 4. All walkways will be kept clean and care shall be taken not to create unnecessary hazards to the walking surface. 5. Unless otherwise indicated or directed, the Contractor shall provide a general clean-up operation at least once a week for the purpose of picking up debris which may accumulate from use of the area, windblown debris, dropped twigs or branches, leaves or paper in the landscape area. G. Irrigation System (Computer Controlled) 1. Operation a. The water schedule will be established and programmed by the City's landscape maintenance supervisor. Application rates will be based on the amount the planting areas are capable of receiving without excessive runoff. The irrigation system's schedule shall be reviewed with the City. b. In determining rates of application, soil type, topography and weather conditions will be taken into consideration. The project is equipped with an automatic system which provides for repeat cycles. Applying water over short periods of time will allow for proper infiltration and thereby minimize runoff. C. Sprinkler heads shall be kept clear of overgrowth which may obstruct Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 32 0313 maximum operation. d. Contractor will avoid manual activation of automatic valves. e. Contractor will keep system in operation by valve or head adjustment to keep all systems operating at manufacturer's recommended operating pressures. This shall be accomplished by valve throttling and pressure gauge. f. Contractor will be responsible for hand watering any areas not provided with an irrigation system, or any area resulting from the physical breakdown of the irrigation system. 2. Maintenance a. The Contractor shall be responsible for the cost of cleaning, repair, adjustment and replacement of irrigation system components, with the exception of irrigation controllers and backflow protection devices. b. The Contractor shall be responsible for the cost of cleaning, repair, adjustment and replacement of all items listed in the foregoing paragraphs in addition to the following: Pipe Pipe Fittings Remote Control Valve Wiring Remote Control Valves Manual Control Valves Quick Coupler Valves Sprinkler Heads Valve Boxes C. Replacement of any item shall be with an item of identical design, unless otherwise specified in writing by the City. 1). The following specifications are provided for replacement of plastic pipe and plastic pipefittings: a) Plastic pipe shall be polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Schedule 40, Type 1, Grade 2 (PVC 1220). b) Plastic pipefittings and connections shall be PVC Schedule 40. 2). The Contractor shall inspect and examine the irrigation system while water is on twice per month. 3). Any part of the system not functioning normally shall immediately be cleaned, adjusted, repaired or replaced. 4). Contractor shall be responsible for adjusting height of risers necessary to compensate for plant material growth. 5). Automatic controllers will be kept locked at all times Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 33 0314 2.03 MISCELLANEOUS A. Inspection The Contractor shall be responsible for notifying Owner upon discovery of damage to facilities (i.e. drinking fountains, lighting poles and fixtures, etc.) which could be a potential health and safety hazard or could be an inconvenience to the general public. B. Inspections will be made by the Contractor on a weekly basis and/or at the request of the City. 2.04 FERTILIZATION A. General Fertilizers shall be dry, pelletized formation, as specified. Application shall be in accordance with indicated rates and times. B. Method of Application In making application of fertilizer granules, caution shall be taken to contain these materials in the planting areas. Avoid use of cyclone spreaders which tend to throw material into paved areas, etc. Use gravity flow spreaders when possible to keep material contained in planting areas. C. Timing of Application When climatic factors may cause problems of general containment of fertilizer materials, adjustment of the fertilizer schedule may be necessary. Avoid application of fertilizers prior to forecasted rainy weather, etc., which might affect stability. After fertilizer application, monitor watering schedule to eliminate runoff of fertilizer materials in solution. D. Trees and Shrubs Agriform 21 grams plant tablets shall be applied to trees and shrubs that require supplemental feeding. Annual fall feeding shall be done in accordance with the rates indicated. Place tablets 6 to 8 inches deep. PRODUCT ANALYSIS TIME RATE PER 1,000 S.F. 20-10-5 As required 1 gal plant - 1 tablet 5 gal plant - 2-3 tabs mature trees - 1 tab per 1/2" of caliper PART 3 - CLEAN UP Contractors shall remove all debris associated with his work from the project site on a daily basis. Contractor is responsible for providing proper debris receptacles, or disposing of debris off site. All receptacles or off site disposal must conform to state and local codes. Contractor is responsible for identifying any waste associated with his work which may be deemed as being "hazardous" as defined by the EPA, and disposing of it per EPA regulations. Highway 111 Landscape Design Guidelines 34 -� O3i5 APPENDIX ),"EXPANSION FELT WITH REMOVABLE WOOD CAP. EXPANSION JOINT TO SE AT 40'O.C. ALONG PATTERN JOINT OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. I FT MINIMUM AT EDGE I MIL CLEAR POLYETHELENE SHEETING 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE EXPANSION JOINT WEAKENED PLANE JOINT @ 10- O.C. ALONG PATTERN JOINT. STAMPED PAVING i- MEDIAN CURB 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE PAVING -CURB INTERFACE STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE PAVING WITH RUNNING BOND BRICK (4"x 6') PATTERN, PERPENDICULAR TO CURB FACE. ROUNDED TOP, MINIMUM 4- DEPTH, Z- RADIUS AT EDGES (INTEGRAL COLOR, L.M. SCOFIELD, C-32, LA QUINTA QUARRY RED OR EQUAL.) FOR CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS SEE CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. 200, 7; 2 90,% COMPACTED SUBGRADE REVERSE'V- CONTROL JOINT TERMINATE STAMPED CONCRETE WITH A REVERSE "S" PATTERN TRANSITION TO LANDSCAPED AREA .PLAN VIEW PATTERN DETAIL DEPARTMENT OF PU13LJC WORKS ENGINEERING.DIVISION I LOW= =I APPROVED BY: STAMPED CONCRETE FOR U 5 I�wn,m5� E`y of TtT4'9��v COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Title 11 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to Add Section 11 .73.060 (Locked Storage) to Chapter 11.73 RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: 2 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Motion to take up Ordinance No. _, by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. _, on first reading amending the La Quinta Municipal Code to add Subsection 1 1.73.060 (Locked Storage) to Chapter 1 1.73, Title 11. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The City of La Quinta (City) does not have any provision in its municipal code requiring the locked storage of spray paint aerosol containers. Instead, the City has relied on California Penal Code Section 594.1(a)(1), which makes it unlawful to sell etching cream or spray paint to anyone under age 18. (Signs are clearly posted at La Quinta retail stores that sell aerosol paint informing people of the Penal Code Section). The La Quinta Police Department (LQPD) has conducted research to determine the need of passing a municipal code provision mandating locked storage of aerosol containers of spray paint by retailers. Data was gathered from the cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert, where the municipal codes require locked 0317 storage of aerosol paint containers. Statistics for graffiti incidents were gathered for the last five years for those two cities and the results were compared to the graffiti incident data for La Quinta in the same time period. The purpose of the comparison was to determine if mandatory locked storage of spray paint has a direct correlation to the number of graffiti incidents in each city. LQPD's 42-page report is available in the City Manager's Office for review. LQPD related that although its study did not conclusively determine that requiring retail establishments to have a locked storage area for aerosol paint containers was directly or solely responsible for deterring graffiti incidents, a similar requirement in the City's municipal code would certainly lower the probability of persons obtaining aerosol spray paint for vandalism purposes. Staff, in conjunction with LQPD, recommends that Council consider adopting a municipal code requirement similar to Palm Desert and Indian Wells that mandates locked storage of aerosol spray canisters. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the Council include: 1 . Motion to take up Ordinance No. , by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. _, on first reading amending the La Quinta Municipal Code to add Subsection 11.73.060 (Locked Storage) to Chapter 11 .73, Title 1 1; or 2. Do not introduce an Ordinance amending the La Quinta Municipal Code to add Subsection 11.73.060 (Locked Storage) to Chapter 11.73, Title 11; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, Bret M. Plumlee Assistant City Manager -Management Services Approved for submission by: i,a2� Thom P. Genovese/ City Manager 0318 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ADD SECTION 11.73.060 — LOCKED STORAGE — TO REGULATE THE SALE OF AEROSOL SPRAY PAINT. WHEREAS, the City wishes to amend the La Quinta Municipal Code to require retail businesses that sell aerosol spray paint to keep said paint locked securely; and WHEREAS, the City has received a recommendation from the La Quinta Police Department that the City adopt the proposed ordinance to help deter graffiti; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to prevent easy access to minors and to deter graffiti, locked areas should be required for any business that sell aerosol spray paint. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La' Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 11.73.060. Subsection 11.73.060 is hereby added to Title 11, the "PEACE, MORALS AND SAFETY" Chapter of the La Quinta Municipal Code, reads in its entirety as follows: Section 11 73 060 Regulation of the Sale of Aerosol Spray Paint. Any retail business that sells aerosol spray paint shall be required to contain such paint in securely locked areas. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta at a regular meeting thereof held on the _`h day of 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 0319 Ordinance No. 2011- Locked Storage Spray Paint Adopted: , 2011 Page 2 of 2 DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: VERONICA MONTECINO, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 0320 i COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Two City Council STUDY SESSION: Members to Serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $10,000 has been budgeted in the Civic Center Art Purchase Account No. 270.0000.451.74-80. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Since 1989, with the exception of 2004 and 2005, the City has been selecting artwork from the La Quinta Arts Festival ("Festival") to be displayed at various City facilities. Two City Council Members, with assistance from two Community Services Commission members, have viewed the artwork at the Festival for consideration of an art purchase. Historically, the Art Purchase Committee has met the first day of the Festival to select art for the City and deliver it to the City after the Festival. Mayor Adolph and Council Member Evans participated on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee in 2010. Should the City Council decide to participate in purchasing artwork this year from the Festival, the Community Services Commission will be asked to assist this year's Civic Center Art Purchase Committee made up of the two City Council representatives. 0321 The Festival will be held from March 10 - 13, 2011 at the Civic Center Campus. The Art Purchase Committee may wish to meet prior to the start of the Festival to discuss particular locations and suitable artwork during the opening hours of the Festival. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Appoint two City Council members to serve on the Civic Center Art Purchase Committee to select Civic Center Art during the La Quinta Arts Festival; or 2. Do not participate in the selection of artwork from the La Quinta Arts Festival; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. Respectfully submitted, '4""Edie Hylto Community Services Director Approved for submission by: 4Q201��_� Thom P. Genovese, City Manager 0322 AGENDA CATEGORY: COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: February 1, 2011 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Early Repayment of the Loans from the City of La Quinta to the La Quinta STUDY SESSION: Redevelopment Agency PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDATION: As deemed appropriate by the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Staff has conducted a financial analysis of the outstanding loans agreements between the City and the RDA. Currently, $41.38 million is owed by the Agency to the City. Based upon the Governor's recent proposal to eliminate all Redevelopment Agencies within the State of California on June 30, 2011, staff has some concern that these existing loan agreements might not be honored by the Legislature. Early repayment of the loans would ensure the likelihood that both principal and interest would be repaid and not get left in limbo if the Legislature abolishes Redevelopment Agencies or temporarily suspends any of their powers. However, the City would lose the benefit of the Agency's interest payment. If the City Council and the Agency Board decide on February 1, 2011, that the loans should be repaid at this juncture, the Agency would pay the City $35,898,734 of the $41.38 million. This would consist of $22,000,000 from Project Area 1, and $13,898,734 from Project Area 2. The portion of the debt that would not be paid at this juncture would be the loan the City made to the Agency for the acquisition of the 10 acres of property south of Highway 111 and east of Dune Palms. That loan agreement would be paid off when that property is sold. With the reduction of principal, the amount of future interest earnings on these loans in future years would be reduced. The City would not receive approximately $1.4 million in interest payments this fiscal year if the loan is paid off on February 1, 2011 and would not receive up to $3.38 million per year in subsequent fiscal years. 03'_' 3 CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Since its creation, the Agency has entered into a variety of loan agreements with the City. Many of those agreements have been paid off. Others still exist. The total amount of debt owed by the Agency to the City is $41.38 million. All of the existing loan agreements pre -date the Governor's January 10, 2011 unveiling of his plan to eliminate redevelopment agencies. As the Council is aware, this proposal would eliminate all Redevelopment Agencies state-wide, including ours, in five months, effective July 1, 2011. As a result of this proposal, staff wishes to ensure that the City is able to recoup the $41.38 million in loans that the City has made to the Agency. Unfortunately, staff cannot predict what the Legislature will do in response to the Governor's proposal. If the Legislature honors all contracts that pre -date the Governor's announcement, the loan agreements would not be in jeopardy. However, if the Legislature took an action that affected contracts entered into before that date, disputes about the enforceability of the loans/and or the legislation would no doubt arise. Also, it is certainly possible that the Legislature could temporarily suspend one or more of the powers held by Redevelopment Agencies. Because of the uncertainty that such legislation could create, staff wanted to provide the City Council with various options regarding the City -Agency loans. It is important to note that if the entire $41.38 million could be repaid on February 1, 2011, the General Fund would not receive the entire $3.38 million in interest earnings budgeted in FY 2010/2011 and would receive no interest earnings in future fiscal years. Based upon the current yield of the portfolio of one half of one percent or 0.5% the interest earnings on these funds would yield $207,000 or a reduction of $3.17 million. This $3.17 million decline in interest earnings to the General Fund would have to be addressed in future budgets. 0324 2 The outstanding loans and interest payments are as follows: Project Area No. 1 Loan Outstanding Principal 6,000,000 10,000,000 6,000,000 22,000,000 Annual General Fund Rate Interest 7.00% 420,000 7.00% 700,000 10.00% 600,000 1,720,000 Project Area No. 2 Loan Outstanding Annual General Fund Principal Rate Interest 9,378,966 7.00% 656,500 10,000,000 10.00% 1,000,000 19, 378, 966 1,656, 500 41,378,966 3,376,500 Sources for Repaying the Project Area No. 1 Loans If the Council or Agency desires to repay the $22 million in outstanding loans, staff would propose the: following actions, which, if approved, would be incorporated into the mid -year budget report to be presented at the February 15, 2011 meeting: • Have Project Area 1 repay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (SERAF) payment of $4,855,193 instead of Project Area 2; • By repaying the PA 1 loans on February 1, 2011 the Agency would save $716,000 in interest earnings that could be used for debt service principal repayment; • Eliminate $26,139,193 in the Capital Improvement Program appropriated for SilverRock Resort projects. This would leave approximately $9.0 million 0325 3 available for SilverRock projects after the elimination and leave $5.96 million for SilverRock canal project improvements. As a result of these actions, the entire Project Area No. 1 outstanding loan of $22 million could be repaid on February 1, 2011. Sources for Repaying the Protect Area No. 2 Loans Unlike Project Area No. 1, the entire $19,378,966 cannot be currently repaid at this time. One component of the Project Area No. 2 debt is the $9,378,966 loan of December 4, 2007. This loan was made to reimburse the low and moderate income fund for approximately 10 acres the Agency purchased south of Highway 111 and east of Dune Palms that is to be used for a future auto dealership(s). The principal on the loan was to be paid off over an eleven year period. Unfortunately, the loan principal was not able to be budgeted for due to: (1) the fact that the Agency has not yet sold the property; (2) a negative fund balance existed in the Debt Service Fund No. 2 as reported in the Comprehensive Audited Financial Report (CAFR); and (3) the State SERAF payment of $4.85 million was mandated to be paid by the Agency after the loan was approved and budgeted for in PA 2. If the Council and/or Agency desires to have the loans paid off early, Staff is proposing the following actions to repay as much of the loan as possible which, if approved, would be incorporated into the mid -year budget report to be presented at the February 15, 2011 meeting: • As previously reported, have Project Area 1 repay the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (SERAF) payment of $4,855,193 instead of Project Area 2 which would allow for the payment of $3,898,734 of principal through FY 2010/2011 on the $9,378,966 leaving an outstanding balance of $5,480,232 (Attachment 1) . The remaining balance of approximately $ 950,000 would go toward the repayment of the other $10 million in PA 2 loans; • By repaying the PA 2 loans on February 1, 2011 the Agency would save $690,000 in interest earnings that could be used for debt service principal repayment; • Use $412,000 in unused funds from the Washington St. Simon Drive Drainage Improvements to repay the other $10 million in PA 2 loans; 03 n6 4 • Eliminate the Hwy 111 Dedicated Right Turn lane at Washington St, which may qualify for CVAG funding in the future and use the $260,000 in available funding to repay the other $10 million in PA 2 loans; • Eliminate the sidewalk and handicap funding of $35,000 and use the available funding to repay the other $10 million in PA 2 loans; and, • Transfer $7,653,000 from Debt Service No. 2 to the General Fund to repay the balance of the $10 million loan. As a result of these actions, $13,898,734 of the PA No. 2 outstanding loan of $19,378,966 could be repaid on February 1, 2011 leaving a balance of $5,480,232 on the Financing Agreement pertaining to the 10 acres on Highway 111. Due to the Governor declaring a fiscal emergency on January 20, 2011, the State's lawmakers have 45 days or March 15t to address the states fiscal troubles. The City Council may want to defer immediate action to repay the loans into the future and allow the City Manager/Executive Director to execute the repayment if events, in his opinion, are warranted. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives available to the City Council include: Authorize the City Manager to take the steps necessary to effectuate the early repayment of the loans between the City of La Quinta and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Project Areas 1 and 2 if he determines it is in the best interest of the City to do so; or 2. Approve early repayment of loan agreements between the City of La Quinta and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Project Areas 1 and 2 and direct the staff to incorporate the above recommendations into the February 15, 2011 mid -year budget report; or 3. Direct staff to continue to monitor the situation and report back to the City Council; or 4. Provide staff with alternative direction. 0321 6 Respectfully submitted, John M. Falconer, Finance Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachment: 1. December 4, 2007 Financing Agreement Analysis 0323 N ATTACHMENT 1 12J42007 Financing Agreement (Retluction) Annual Rate Beginning Pnnciml Ending Interest FY 20072008 2ntl OV 122007 9,378,968.W 9,378,966,00 ].00% 47,651.20 3M Otr MIQ008 9,378,96600 9,378,966.00 700% 164,131.91 481 QV 6302008 9,378,9%.00 9,378,966.W 7.00% 164,131.91 4th Otr 61302008 9,378,966.00 (48$201.31) 8,890,764.69 375,915.01 FY 200WON 1st Otr 90108 8.890,76489 8,890,764.69 7.00% 155.588,38 2ntl OV 12L!W8 8,890,764,69 8,890,76d69 7.00% 155,588.38 3r8 OV 3212009 8,890,784.69 8,890,7134.69 7.00% 155.588.W 4th ptr 6302009 8,890,764.69 8,890,764.69 7W% 155,588.38 4th Otr 61302008 8,80.764.69 (852,633,27) 8,038,13142 622,353.53 FY2Wg2010 1st OV 92009 8,03$131.42 8.038,13142 7,00% 140,66720 2nd QV 122W9 8.038,13142 8,038,131.42 7.W% 140.W7,30 3M ph 3312010 8,038131.42 0,035,131.42 7.00% 140,667.30 4th Otr 6/302010 8,038,131.42 8038,131.42 7,00% 140,W7.30 41h QV W02010 8,038,131.42 (852,633.27) 7,185,498,15 W2,669.20 FY 2010=11 1st Ov 92010 7,185,498A5 7,185,498.15 7.00% 125,746.22 2ntl Otr 122010 7,185,498,15 7,185,498. 15 7.00% 125,74822 3M Otr 3/312011 7.185,498,15 7,185,498,15 7.00% 125.746,22 41h pv 8302011 7,185,498,15 7.185.498.15 7.00% 125,746.22 40, Otr 6/WI2011 7,185,498.15 (852,633.27) 6,W2,86487 W2,98487 FY 20112012 1st ptr 92011 6.332,864,87 6,332,864,87 7.00% 11D,825.14 2ntl OV 122011 6,332,864.87 6,332,864.87 ]00% 110.825.14 3M Otr 3312012 6,332,864.87 6,332,86487 7,00% 110,825,14 4th ptr 613012012 6,332,864.87 6,332,864.87 7,00% 110,825.14 41h OV 630/2012 6,332,864.87 (852,633.27) 5,480,23160 443,3W.54 FY 20122013 1st QV 92012 5,480,231.60 5,480,231.60 7.00% 95,904.05 2ntl OV 1=112 5,480,231.60 5,480,231.60 7.00% 95,904.05 3M OV MUM* 5.480,23160 5,480,231.60 7,00% 95,904.05 4th QV 6/30R013 5,480,231.60 5,4W,231 W 7,00% 95,904.05 4th OV 613041013 5,480,231.60 (852,633.27) 4,627,598.33 383.616,21 FY201M!314 lstptr 92013 4,627,596.33 4,627,598.33 7,00% 80.982.97 2nE OV 122013 4,627,598.33 4,627598.33 7W% 80,982.97 3M Otr M151014 4,627.598,33 4,627,598.33 7.00% 80,98297 41h OV 6/302014 4.627,598,33 4,627,598,33 7.00% 80,982.97 41h QV 8302014 4.627.598.33 (852,633,27) 3,774,985.05 323,931.88 FY 20142015 1stM 92014 3,774,965.05 3,774,965.05 7.00% W,WI,89 2ntl QV 122014 3,774,955,05 3,774,965.05 7.00% %,W1.89 3M QV 3312015 3,774,95,05 3,774,965.05 700% 66.051.89 4th Qv 8302015 3,774,965,05 3.774.96505 7,00% 66,06189 4th ptr 6I302015 3,774,965.05 (852.833.27) 2,922,331.78 26Q247.55 FY20152016 1st Otr 92015 2,922,Wl.78 2,922,33178 7.00% 51,140,81 2ntl OV 122015 2.922.331,78 2.922.331.78 7.00% 51,140.81 3r8 OV 3I312016 2,922,331.78 2,922,331.78 7,00% 51,140,81 4th Otr WOQ016 2.922,331,78 2,922,331,78 ].00% 51,140.B1 41h QV 6302018 2,822,331.7E (852,633.27) 2,069,698.51 204563.22 FY 20162017 1stW 92015 2,069,698.51 2,059,598.51 7W% 36,21972 2ntl OV 122016 2,0E9,698.51 2,059,698,51 7.00% 36,21972 31-c! OV W12017 2,069,698.51 2,0,39,698.51 7.00% W,21972 41h OV 6302017 2089.698.51 2,059,898.51 700% 36,21972 4th OV 6W2017 2,069,698,51 (852.633.27) 1,217,06524 144878.W FY20172018 1sl O1r K017 1,217085.24 1,217,065.24 7.00% 21,29864 2ad OV 122017 1,217,06524 1,217,065,24 7.W% 21.298,64 3M OV 3312618 1,217,065.24 1,217,065.24 700% 21,2986,1 4th OV M=018 1,217,065.24 1,217,06524 7,00% 21,29864 4th OV 61302018 1,217,065.24 (852,633,27) 364,431.96 85.194.57 FY 20182019 13tpV 92018 364,431.96 364431.96 7.00% 6,377,56 2.d OV 122018 364,43193 384,431.98 7W% 4,526,01 2ntl Otr 1220113 354,431.96 (3 ,431.96) OW 10,903.57 (9,378,966. W ) 03 9 \ � - \ § 7 f § / ! ! § ! § f ! ! . .} . . . . !: § f \ ( ) ! § \ \ ( \ \ \ \ \ 0c m REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: . /ES INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING December 8, 2010 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Investment Advisory Board was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairman Park followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Mortenson, Blum, Park and Spirtos ABSENT: Board Member Rassi STAFF PRESENT: John Falconer, Finance Director, Vianka Orrantia, Senior Secretary and Bryan Gruber, Lance Soll & Lunghard LLC, Audit Manager II. PUBLIC COMMENT - None III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA — Confirmed as amended. At the request of Board Member Spirtos, Mr. Falconer suggested that Section VI. Item A be the first item of discussion. Board concurred. At this time Section VI, Item A was discussed. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of Meeting on November 10, 2010 for the Investment Advisory Board MOTION — It was moved by Board Members Spirtos/Mortenson to approve the minutes of November 10, 2010. Motion carried unanimously. V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasury Report for October 2010 Mr. Falconer presented and reviewed the staff report for the month of September, advising the Board that the balances decreased slightly by $2 million with the yields remaining unchanged and the average maturity decreased by 19 days as a result of the investments getting 0331 closer to maturity, the monthly payment to the Sheriff's Department, the semi-annual debt service payment and capital improvement expenditures. Mr. Falconer also advised that page 4 currently reflects an overage of the maximum allowed by Medium Corporate Term Notes. Mr. Falconer further advised that the portfolio was experiencing unrealized gains of approximately $217,000. Mr. Falconer advised that due to the upcoming maturities in Treasury Bills, that he was considering reinvesting in three month treasuries which would result in a decline in the portfolio by approximately three to four basis points. In response to Board Member Spirtos, Mr. Falconer clarified that page 9, Column YTD Forecast; Forecasted Favorable (Unfavorable) 8.85% is reported for the Redevelopment Agency. In response to Chairman Park, Mr. Falconer advised that Riverside County Sheriff's office is scheduled to be paid on a monthly basis but they are behind on their billing by four months. In response to Board Member Blum, Mr. Falconer advised the City is invoiced monthly by the County of Riverside for police services based upon the actual service provided with some costs shared with other cities. In response to Board Member Blum, Mr. Falconer summarized for the Board the costs of building and running the firehouses in the City limits. In addition Mr. Falconer clarified the difference between a Charted City and General Law City. MOTION — It was moved Board Members Blum/Mortenson to review, receive, and file the Treasurers Report for October 2010. Motion carried unanimously. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL A. City of La Quinta FY 09/10 Audited Financial Statements Mr. Bryan Gruber of Lance Soil, & Lunghard, LLP, Audit Managers presented the Audited Financial Statement for year ending June 30, 2010. Mr. Gruber advised the Board that the audit is conducted in phases; the interim audit is conducted during the fiscal year with the focus on internal controls of the City related to the City's cash and investments balances, in addition to the controls in place, the 0332 2 investments balances, in addition to the controls in place, the purchasing of investments and the testing of transactions and backup to verify that the controls are functioning correctly, (which also includes a series of tests in other areas). The next part of the audit is conducted after the fiscal year end and the focus of the audit at that time are the City's cash balances that are reported in the financial statements, which are reviewed through a series of tests including independent third party confirmations in addition to auditing the information of the financial statements, which also includes the City's cash and investments. As a result of the audit there are two forms of communication, the first is a report of internal controls and compliance, which there were no noted material weaknesses or issues of non-compliance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The first letter issued to the City is in accordance with auditing standards and various other standards that is related to this particular communication. As a result of the final report issued to the City is the independent auditors report (the financial statements), which is an unqualified opinion, which is the best opinion that could be received in a financial audit. Mr. Gruber advised of the footnote listed on page 42, which relates to cash and investments, this footnote provides an overview of the City's cash and investments balances, the various risks that are related to the City's investing activities and also provides the City's position, and to the policy if applicable to the various risks. One potential risk to the City is the interest rate risk, a risk that changes in market interest rates that adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Mr. Gruber advised that the City is provided with a table that schedules the maturity of the City's cash and investments balances, at this time approximately 90% of the portfolio will mature within one year or less. Mr. Gruber also advised of an risk to the City's portfolio, that being credit risk, which is a risk that an issuer will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment, the City's investments are disclosed by credit rating, either standard or poor at the end of the year, with the City's current rating at AA or better. Another risk to the City is the concentration of credit risk; under GASB 40 it is a requirement that the auditors report any investments that are more than 5% of the portfolio. Reported at this time was securities held with Federal Home Loan Bank. The final risk to the City is custodial credit risk, the risk that in the event of failure of depository financial institution government the City would not be able to recover its deposits; currently the City has not been exposed to any custodial credit risk. 0333 3 Mr. Gruber advised that on page 3, the City provides a management discussion and analysis which provides an overview of the financial statements and position of the City. Mr. Gruber also advised that the City implemented a new statement, GASB Statement 54 which changes the classification and the appearance of the fund balance in the financial statements. GASB Statement 54 was issued to provide more transparency and make it more apparent the constraints on fund balances. As a result of GASB Statement 54, the report on fund balances has changed somewhat. In response to Board Member Mortenson, Mr. Gruber advised that this year there were no recommended changes to the current internal controls. General discussion ensued amongst the Board, staff and Mr. Gruber in regards to the Fiscal Year June 30, 2010 Comprehensive Financial Annual Report. The Board at this time thanked Mr. Gruber for his attendance and reporting of this year's financial report. Noted and Filed B. Month End Cash Report - November 2010 Mr. Falconer advised that the interest rates to date have been stable, but recently shown a slight increase, as a result there has been a decline in LAIF to .45% basis points. Noted and Filed C. Pooled Money Investment Board Reports - September 2010 Mr. Falconer advised that average portfolio has increased by $4 billion in comparison to last year's portfolio. Mr. Falconer commented that if Treasury Bills interest rates begin to increase, LAIF might not be able to sell Treasuries and report a gain. Board Member Mortenson advised the Board of the comment made by Councilmember Henderson and her sentiments in regards to LAIF. Noted and Filed 0334 51 D. November 9, 2010 Joint Meeting Minutes with the City Council Due to the fact that meeting minutes were not available at this time, the joint meeting minutes will be distributed at the next scheduled Board meeting. VII. BOARD MEMBER ITEMS - None Vill. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Members Mortenson/ to adjourn the Investment Advisory Board meeting at 4:44 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Subm' Vianka Orrantia Senior Secretary 0335 5 Department Report: I -A a, OFT TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bret M. Plumlee, Assistant City Manager, Management Services/%% DATE: February 1, 2011 SUBJECT: Department Report - Response to Public Comment The following public comment was made at the January 18, 2011 City Council meeting: 1. Hal Seay, 52-795 Avenida Obregon, requested a change to the City Council minutes of January 4, 2011 and stated his comments should reflect that the car was in the driveway, not at the curb. 0336 Department Report: t7-A �a �•c �cEM OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The Honorable Chairman and Member of the Planning Commission FROM: Les Johnson, Planning Direct r DATE: February 1, 2011 SUBJECT: Department Report - General Plan Monthly Update The holidays were a busy time for the General Plan Update. Staff has been following up to incorporate the Council's discussion and feedback from their December 7' meeting discussing the land use map and goals. At this point, staff has also completed a first draft of most of the General Plan elements. The few remaining elements to be written (Traffic and Circulation, Economic Development, Land Use, and Air Quality) are generally reliant on special studies expected to be completed in the corning months. In December, members of the General Plan Technical Advisory Committee took the opportunity to review a complete Public Infrastructure and Services chapter. Staff is currently implementing their suggestions into a revised draft. The chapter incorporated the new layout and formatting for the General Plan, providing a better sense of the overall appearance and how the document will work. Also last month, staff hosted a Scoping Meeting for the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the meeting was to provide other public agencies, utilities, and interest groups the opportunity to discuss their areas of concern or interest with the General Plan. Representatives of the City of Coachella and County Supervisor Benoit's office attended the meeting. Discussion topics primarily focused on planning cooperation within the Sphere of Influence. The next few months will see the completion of most remaining draft General Plan elements, further Chapter reviews by the Technical Advisory Committee, and the completion of a number of outstanding special studies, including the City's Comprehensive Traffic Impact Analysis and updated Traffic Forecast Model. 0337