2011 07 19 CCeaf 440"
City Council agendas are
available on the City's web page
@ www.la-quinta.org
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2011 at 4:00 P.M.
Beginning Resolution No. 2011-061
Ordinance No. 491
CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call:
Council Members: Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, and Mayor Adolph
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CLOSED SESSION — NONE
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed
on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to
three minutes.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS — NONE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 JULY 19, 2011 nnl
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 5, 2011
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: Consent Calendar items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved
by one motion.
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JULY 19, 2011
2. RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT DATED MAY 31, 2011
3. RECEIVED AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED MAY
31, 2011 AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING JUNE 30, 2011
4. APPROVAL TO EXCUSE COMMISSIONER MARK WEBER'S ABSENCE FROM
THE JULY 12, 2011 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
5. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE EMERGENCY
SERVICES COORDINATOR TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY
SERVICES ASSOCIATION 2011 ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO,
CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 3 - 6, 2011
6. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE EMERGENCY
SERVICES COORDINATOR' TO ATTEND THE INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF EMERGENCY MANAGERS ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT EXPOSITION IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
NOVEMBER 11 - 17, 2011
7. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY
SAFETY MANAGER, SENIOR CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER, AND TWO
CODE OFFICERS TO ATTEND THE 2011 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ANNUAL TRAINING IN PACIFIC GROVE,
CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 6 - 9, 2011
8. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
488 AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD
SECTION 11.44.100 - DOG PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 JULY 19, 2011 n02
9. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
489 AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO (1)
CLARIFY THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN LANDSCAPED PARKWAYS
§9.50.100, (2) CORRECT AN ERROR REGARDING GUEST HOUSES AND
SECONDARY UNITS §9.140.070, (3) ADJUST THE TIME EXTENSION
PERIOD FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMITS §9.200.080, (4) DELETE
OBSOLETE LANGUAGE REFERENCING GUESTHOUSE EXAMPLES
§9.210.020, AND (5) REVISE DEFINITIONS OF CHILD DAY CARE USES TO
BE CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW §9.280.030
10. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
490 AMENDING TITLE 13 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ALLOW A MAXIMUM CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH OF 1320 FEET
11. AUTHORIZATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE A GRANT OF
EASEMENT TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR AN EASEMENT FOR
ELECTRICAL FACILITIES ALONG AVENUE 52 IN PARCEL 18 OF PARCEL
MAP NO. 33367
12. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE LA
QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION
13. ACCEPTANCE OF MILES AVENUE MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2010-13
14. ACCEPTANCE OF TURF REDUCTION GREEN PROJECTS, PROJECT NO.
2009-18
15. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE FISCAL YEAR
2010/2011 SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, PROJECT NO. 2010-15
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF MAKING A REQUEST TO THE CITY OF INDIO TO
COMPLETE THE NECESSARY STUDIES TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REGARDING FUTURE GOLDENVOICE
CONCERTS AT THE INDIO POLO FIELDS
A. MINUTE ORDER ACTION
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 JULY 19, 2011 V 3
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ELECTING TO COMPLY WITH PART
1.9 OF ABX1 27, THE REDEVELOPMENT CONTINUATION ACT
A. TAKE UP ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE
FURTHER READING
B. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. FOR FIRST READING
STUDY SESSION - NONE
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (FRANKLIN)
2. BOB HOPE CLASSIC FUND DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE (FRANKLIN)
3. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS
4. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS
5. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WORKSHOP/INFORMATION EXCHANGE
COMMITTEE (ADOLPH)
6. C.V. CONSERVATION COMMISSION (SNIFF)
7. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (ROBERT COX)
8. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (FRANKLIN)
9. C.V.W.D. JOINT WATER POLICY COMMITTEE (ADOLPH)
10. IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE (FRANKLIN)
11. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (FRANKLIN)
12. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON)
13. PALM SPRINGS DESERT RESORT COMMUNITIES CONVENTION & VISITORS
AUTHORITY (EVANS)
14. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (ROBERT TEAL)
15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DIANE GUNN)
16. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON)
17. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH)
18. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JUNE 13, 2011
19. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 21, 2011
20. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES DATED
JUNE 1, 2011
21. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 26 AND JUNE 14, 2011
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. CITY MANAGER
A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
B. UPDATE ON THE GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE LA QUINTA PROGRAM
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 JULY 19, 2011 1 .04
2. CITY ATTORNEY
3. CITY CLERK
A. UPCOMING EVENTS AND CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR
4. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 2011
5. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 2011
A. UPDATE ON THE CITY'S 30TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION EVENTS
6. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT - NONE
7. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 2011
8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 2011
9. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 2011
10. FIRE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING JUNE 2011
MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed
on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to
three minutes.
PRESENTATIONS — NONE
PUBLIC HEARINGS
For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed
with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item.
A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear
in support or opposition to the approval of a project. If you challenge a project in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public
hearing.
1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING
AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND AMENDED PLANS TO DEVELOP LA
PALOMA, A 208-UNIT SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50.
APPLICANT: WSL LA QUINTA, LLA
A. TWO RESOLUTION ACTIONS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 JULY 19, 2011 1 ^ 5
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on AUGUST 2, 2011
commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Susan Maysels, Deputy City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare
that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting of July 19, 2011,
was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico
and on the bulletin boards at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas and 78-630 Highway 111,
on JULY 15, 2011.
DATED: JULY 15, 2011
SUSAN MAYSELS, Deputy City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
Public Notices
• The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special
equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at
777-7103, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations
will be made.
• If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council,
arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at
777-7103. A one (1) week notice is required.
• If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council
meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc.,
must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take
place prior to the beginning of the meeting.
• Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any
item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk
counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253,
during normal business hours.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 JULY 19, 2011 1-6
T4tvl 4 4 Q"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Honorable Agency Chair and Members of the Redevelopment
Agency Board \ /
FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director X
DATE: July 19, 2011 CCCJJJ
SUBJECT: Changes to July 19, 201.1 Warrant Register
The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit a revised warrant register
which reflects: 1) a voided warrant to the California Redevelopment Agency
for FY 201 1 /2012 membership services and 2) reclassifying a Landmark Golf
wire from a demand of cash from the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) to a
Demand of Cash of the City. No other changes are being requested.
Staff plans to process a future warrant to the California Redevelopment
Agency to replace the voided warrant, as soon as it is appropriate taking into
consideration the impacts of ABX1 27, the Redevelopment Continuation Act.
007
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Approval of Demand Register Dated
July 19, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Demand Register Dated July 19, 2011
BACKGROUND:
Prepaid Warrants:
92457 - 92478)
92479 - 92489)
92490-92496)
Voids)
Voids)
Wire Transfers)
P/R 36379 - 3640°
P/R Tax Transfers)
Payable Warrants:
92497 - 92604)
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Demand of Cash -City
Demand of Cash -RDA
A;AA M + Demand of Cash - HA
John M. Falconer, Finance Director
1,219,619.06
15,928.07
420,784.48
(150.00)
(23,700.00)
1,330,698.35
332,591.11
127,868.01
899,509.11
$4,323,148.19
$3,892,329.00
$430,619.19
$200.00
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION
CONSENT CALENDAR
STUDY SESSION
PUBLIC HEARING
il:
T 0 P
/- su
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Approval of Demand Register Dated
July 19, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Demand Register Dated July 19, 2011
BACKGROUND:
Prepaid Warrants:
92457 - 924781
1,219,619.06
92479 - 924891
15,928.07
92490- 92496}
420,784.48
Voids}
(150.00)
Wire Transfers}
1,330,698.35
P/R 36379 - 3640'r
332,591.11
P/R Tax Transfers}
127,868.01
Payable Warrants:
92497 - 92604} 899,509.11
$4,346,848.19
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Demand of Cash -City $3,750,051.62
Demand of Cash -RDA $596,596.57
Demand of Cash - HA $200.00
John M. Falconer, Finance Director
BUSINESS SESSION
CONSENT CALENDAR
STUDY SESSION
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF LA QUINTA
BANK TRANSACTIONS 6128/11 - 7/12/11
6/28/11 WIRE TRANSFER -TASC
6/29/11 WIRE TRANSFER - BOND ISSUE COSTS
6/30/11 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA
7/1/11 WIRE TRANSFER - HEALTH PREMIUM
7/1/11 WIRE TRANSFER -PERS
7/1111 WIRE TRANSFER - CJPIA
7/5/11 WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK
7/8/11 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA
7/8/11 WIRE TRANSFER -PERS
718111 WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA
7/8/11 WIRE TRANSFER - PARS PLAN
718/11 WIRE TRANSFER - PARS EXCESS
7112/11 WIRE TRANSFER-TASC
TOTAL WIRE TRANSFER OUT
$1,472.71
$7,000.00
$19,800.00
$112,257.45
$2,351.32 -
$407,151.00
$142,277.38
$10,983.09
$51,642.42
$147.50
$557,315.14
$12,832.86
$5,467.48
$1,330,698.35
.,1 010
10 0 o O
ly o O
I a N 2 I o 0
1 dN0 � Ill .Ni
W I W I••I O � �+
Q X Q 1
IL�r
. LLQ
� W L
� 1
1
1 1
1
1
N
r r. ra n b O �b M O o rM O V V O e o o V V M M P P
. M .
W Z. P P No P n r V p W .•I N V .•I .a N 0 P P - •+ V V N N
SM I er b bN P N N Po P M M b b O o b b M M M M
UO I M M bP V N N M N w r r r r N N .•� .+ M M
Q . N .1 V .. 'I rI ••I .� b b
x
Y
u
.� W
o � _
N . U
m
O
\ I 1
o I
1
W
W U
r Z
Q i Q
p 1 C s • r w � • U + • r x w »<
Y 1 N J J J J J J K J J J J J J
u 1 z a a a a a a r a a a a a a
u r r r r r r
x o 0 o a o 0 o w o 0 0 o z o 0
J N r W r r r r r r
WY w Y N w Q w w Z w w
J 1 Z I Z O O K O W 6 O 2 O I -I z O Z O W O W O O W O O
.r . O. - W a O Q p r w a W 0 J W 0 O a z a L 0 O U O p
J .+ . •. I w z z z 2 z z L z d p z .-I z O z z Z 2 Z
QO r 1 W W " W WJ W W W dQ W r W 2 W d W W W W W
>N Ld 1 Y > > L > UJ > 0 > >U > Q > d > z > > r > N >
all WI-. I r W Q w NQ r a a w
Y w r z 1 1•+ N z z 7 N W
do MU . J Cd' O 0 pS J W O J
d\ N. rI W W w I -I Y Z J r W .-I r Z d d
Qf� W I u rr J Zr I-. Wn K a0 O O K d
e q I Q Q 6 L W rI W
W LL 33 3 NU w LLY LL Z ap d U N
[r
�LL
r 0 O P P .� M M na V V + Ill V N N Itf
rI o .•I ^I O .•+ � o M M e N M N b N
Z Q o .-I .•� .y N .� .n b b .•I .+ b .r M .•I
W b V V N V V W to M V V M V V V
d
X N .+.+ .-1 .•I P M �? ^•I N 111 O ti N
W V M M M Ill .� .� N N N .� N .•� N •+
M V V V V V V V V V V V V V V
1 I
r o V V M N a0 N V V W N V N V N
= o Oo O oO O 0 0 O N o Ill e
. O 00 a 00 O 000 O
OZ. M rr r MW NN W V N V W V
I U I 11 11 I I I I 1 I I I I
a UO o0 r0 0o O 00 e O o O O O
Z rl N .-1 U .-1 ^I ti N .-1 ••I .-I .-1 '1 '1 r1 r-1
1-I
1 �
1 ^ r
W N r1 .•� rl N '1 r•+ .+ .y .•I' .-I r1 N .•I .r 'I
0 W a m 1^I N .y .•� .i r•I .y H /. ."I 2 .-1 .y .r
O W I U o O p e o e o 0 0 r o 0 o O o 0 0
\r 1 rIN NN N NN N NNN NN N N rIN N N
U 0. M aD W l0 e W aD a0 a0 m O a0 a0 p aD N a0 a0 40 aD O
W WO r00 rN Oe O "00O zO o uo 0 0
ON
U . 3b rr dr err Or 1-Ir r Zf� 6r Nr
WOM 'M0O 0 O 00 O JOO .-.O r0 O 70 z w0
I Y U Y W N O r a L O
Z . Z 0 W O e W O S O O Q O N O O Q O UM O Mo 0 QQ
m I QO JOO JO r00 ZO 00 (DM .-IO QO 00 O 00 Mo
Ill a I K J J O N I -I Z u U w u-
Ill w U r
ZIW N > > Y r W H L m H Q 3
M O W LL U
N 0. =0z 1 ti J J d W N J U K u Z N
P J I d• d 2 W W O W
a106OI QP =IT SV UN" >M O Mo WM SM dM NM JM
U I pWZ I I-IP u00 UP 00 OO UOO We r0 r0 We haO Wo
. ZS JN QMM Q.-1 NMM ZM W"o dM xM I-.M JM Mo CM -
.+ ..Wu Jm mom am <m 111 wW Nllllll Llll Wlll illl WW >M 3
O Q.>O QO UOe UM woo (Do Soo I-Io Zo No ro 0
N r I O O 00 O 00 O 00 O O O O M O
\ J Z I > r
rPlr 1 x
O O O OP O O OP O
O M 1 0 O O O O
\ M O 1 W o O V O O O b o O O am O O =W o
0(9 10 we a.Mo . o N
t m
a. w
w J I mr or I »
. W V V o N b
LLL I OU b 0aG n bi b r r PV Mo N NV
am
d'QO . Z.+ . m.•. Mw� b MNN O. N bP ON V' NV PM W
Qd' . Co. I v MON N.I .-INN 0. COO MN
ON MO Ob NNm
V raD
d0Y I p>z I Vb Mmm 0.+ ONP OP MVP ON 011l Ml MM ON Of� O+
WOr I ZZ . 00 011llll OP =VN ON Obb OM Ob OM eM ON OP 1
lr U I WI-. a= Or•o ON OPN eb OVM 00 O.a Ob MP a.Mo olll
ddUl> . 00 OMM Ob 000 00 OVlll 011l OP 00 ON 00 OP
I O p I O O n
W o 0 0
r QNZ I o oaD
I p•NO I W Inn
W IWwOr w wn
Q ^pQ I If1
I LLQ
I W x
I I
I I
I
Y o
U r
W z r m
x m r N
I U O r P
S r
I a I 1(1
.1
I
r I rl r
w I I
O I I
N I
\ I
0
r r
0
W
a * *
*
y J N
U Q W*
N w*
w p w *
J ZI Z*
w O r 0 W
J w w r a
N Qo f r X*
> N I S R r w W*
O\ I Wwr
KO fUp J*
ao wW. z a*
o q1 H*
w
p� J
FO I F
O
O N �
Z Q
W z
a z
X ¢
w �
N
H i
z
ozl
u
U I
Q I
I
I
W
91
p W r
"I I
Y ¢ I
U G I
W
x
U
Y
I Z
r m
W a I
L w I
Z r x
N y l •O I
N O r Q O Z 1
LL I Z
p. w r LL
JrWO
Q r OY.O r
U r zx
Z
I W U
o ¢ r > >
N H I O I
\ J Z I >
n P w r i
O M O r 0
\ M O Iw r O
nS N
o N Q I
J I
p W
W= O
Kr O U M
60 I Zw I[1
a0C p>Z r n
aN>.1 0
" I Z Z
wwI o
W w O
d du r> I e
012
�0O v
W
�QN2i v
ll I r Z N
i LLQ � v
O In O O b b O O M O M If1 W P P O
Y N N O . I!. If. . . IL. N . . O. P P .
Ur
WZ P P O e P P O o ob b CI O P Pv
v o o O a0 M M v v
U0 P M P P r ra0
,
Q I N N W b N
v v v
0
N � \
O �
0
n
o �
W N �
r
a
p ti x CD x a r ..� .� • a r r a
U Q r Q Q Q Y> 6 Q .4w
W r r W r r Z r J J r r r K
2 Z O W O O O O» O O Off+
rc� � w r L
M rNa 0 > K J r Q OO a oO*
J Z Q O Q a 0 lY Z rr O Z *
U O W O r 0 JJ O O \ * OW
.90 >W*wx*
2 Z S Z N Z \Z Z
QO r W W W W rl W 00 W W
>N Sd K > > N > U' > rr > > r >r
O\ r W N 2 C W N N W
Ka0 rr W ae Z J�
d 0 i-a U. CI ^^ W Q
d\ W N aA - S a..1 W W w
J r.
Qf� I N Q w N LLLL CI r O
O O I Q W W Z r
W
d. J
O LL Q
w MO M N r
0 0o e N O
1 ; ap lal W to N v M v 2
X M M + PP N O Q
w am
v v v Q NN w v O
0 0 O N
Z O o o O 00 o O
�O O O O O 00 O O
am O V
� 1
1
� LL
GW N W>O O O QOO O O
\ r. N r N N N X N N N N
UO Ua0 m a0 Zm
.= 0 WQ
W e O UO 00
Z
2 1 \ ^\ \ \ \\ \ Ir\
U �r NM ar r WPN r rr
O U O O O U O O W O Q O
Y Y Z N Z J U
Z Wo MO Qo O QOO CIO o
0 JO Y.O LO O R'O0 QO 20
C1 H I Q N 2 z U S
H W O
0 a0 aS •O r Z U
LL 2O 1 J- Z W a w
P Q . 0wo Sit W. >M r no- 3P No
U P OWZ 1 UO WO 00 UO ZO.n Wo
.+ - ZS QO NO ZO No 4o0 SO 6'0
.a W U 00 WO W o U o r o 0 M o W o
o >a Uo Oo (po rla NOo ro >e
N r O o o e O Oe ea O
>
N e
M"Ml Sb M
0 0 o e o O ob MN
\ M O W o 0 0 0 o o MO a.
t�S N w aO b
O A Q I
J � I O t`
.. W OO l0 O
W L LL O U b w P O P O O b 0 aD b
O v v IL1 .� b .y
Qlr 00 MM NM M.� O.� Pbb Ov =a
wog Olaf Nlll Oft W= 000 Oa0 00
W O r. Z 2 o O o 0 0 o O O o M M am
O I WN of� Or o�tv OAT am
MLLU am a=�> � 00 00 obb eao OP
4 013
1 0.
1 O q
W
I Q N Z I
WN0 I
W I WrnO I
Ur 1 S 1
Q � •qQ 1
Q
1w 2
1
Y
U z 1
W 1
x0
u01
1 S 1
1 Q 1
.e
rl 1
O
N
O 1
M
\ 1
b
O
W
Q
q 1
1
Y 1
V 1'
W
2
!- U
N
H
J Z 1
nl H 1
J .•I 1
Qo f l
> N L d 1
O\ W.
tr o F- 00 1
dM r+U 1
d \ ab 1 Wl
e q 1
w
s
�LL
HO
qN
Z Q 1
W 1 I
x
W
z 1
Z 1
D O 1
02 �
U
Um
w
m
Q W 1
\ H �
Y Q
1 (iq I
W
2
U
Z
W
b Q 1
l z i
Z I W
o O l a O Z l
w 1 Z
J 1 0
u I o W Z I
122
� W U
N f 1 O
\JZI >
M M a 1 O
\ M O W
b L I N
J 1
w w
WZLL 1 OU
0:QO1 ZH
ad0Y IM>z
w O H I Z Z
mm. 1 W.
ddul>
o O OPT Ill 0 o NOIO It O.INOO O1ll0 P O e oo O M1 M1 O O N1/1 M1
0 o Nell .•I ill o o lfl �toNONPe�f ONe Ill O a oo O P p O O �tp M
o O mom p Ill Ill o),Ib.n 11PNOM1 OItM1 N o O oo O W e W Ill NM b
Ill Ill .I WD Ill N N .1OM1NMmMNP.•Ib N b b elll Ill .+ ••I N N M1M O
0 N ITme p b b Pw pMN b 0 0 N N
.1 .1 O b N w .•I N Ill .•I o o _
Obb M1 M M
N O
O O
hi M
Ik • M XXX u u • IK i ! 11t h iK llt
JJ
J QQQ J J W W J J J J J J
Q FFH Q Q WH H Q Q mx 6 Q Z 6 6
W W 0
O ddd O O Qa O z Q
O NN O I -I O N O
m
f wH F Ud F- f NN f F N H
00ww w F-
0C OC W N W 4.4 N (0
ll1 C d d d 0C g WW wW S C C OC
Q O O z 0 3ZOlf d•N O W O JJ 0 z x 0 O O Z
x Z zzz q W z WQI+QI-IM z N z QQ z W z Z z NO z
w Z ZZZ Z d Z NJLL3LLS Z K Z ww Z L Z O Z QN Z
OC W W W W W x W W m W W W W W W U W 0F W
> SLL > W > QQ6Q6Q > 10 > ZZ > N > > Q >
O !iY 000000 N WW 00 w wo
w QQQ 00 NNNNNN w (0 (0 O 0 4
w ddd z wwwww w- q x o a
I -I WWWWWWWWWWWW (0W S d d•W
q Ir
Q qqq > HHY4'x Qa w 01 0:
x o:zoe o 4444
4........+.... ....a r uu w
MMM L 33333LLLLLLLLLLLL3 Ill UU 0! Q JLL
.•I OOo .•1 .-IN �ipNbbbbb b.•I 11 •"�� M1 e MM
e o e o a o 0 0 0 .•I .� .•I .y .. .-1 .� o 0 0 0 0 .+ .� .•
1 1 1
I[1 M1 N M -V o O O o o .1 .i .•I .•1'1 .i �1 O rI .1 N o .9 •-�
V O O O M1 � Q if �i �i 11 11 11 �T �1 11 M1 m W N M .I 12 11
ti Mem ti .n .y .•1 .1 .r N N NN N NN .n .1M M M •+N
Ill o.•I .-1 O III W I/l llIN NNNNN NIII Ill +•+ '+ .'I MN
Ill NMM Ill 11 �t �t q'lf liV�t 1111VI11 W Qv v v �v
M1 OOo M NWIII IIIW IIIMWIII IIINW N .SIN %T Yl Oeo V oOeoolll l/IW WIfINV W ee e o omlll
a0 oeo a0 OOooOOOmmmwaD eo e o 0O
O .+ .•I .•1 M M M M M Ill Ifl -
Ill Ill I/l l/l .e
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
V N .•1 .� .1 � .y .1 r'1 M .y .� .y .'1 .•1 .-0 .4 11 � N r'1 .'I .y .•� .-1
u
>
N
C7 H .-1 .•I .•1 .� .-1 .1 '•1 .4 N .1 .•I .4 .-I .4 J .� c o
O Z O m 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N o N N
W
N H N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ J \ \ \ \ 0l\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ wo \ \ I'll
e 1.1 O e o O W O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O co O O co
M Y M M M M H M M M M M M M M M M M M 2 M M M M M M M
O o N. 0 0 0 O O e o 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 Qd o o e Y O o W O O N
h O Y
fO "mom om WOOOOOM000mOo o Oe wm O Se0 Q
U o 0 0 0 N e J O e o 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 O O e w O O F- O O SO
w W O J x
OL H 0! a F ~ fll Y I-
F N > 2 Z Z 3 O Q m w a Q ^
O w Z d W
O- w J L Z O W
U U W J
W J W
LM1 ftO pO Jb 2NNNNN.�IN NNNNN JM MM I-IM 6M UMM >
m WNNN aP UPpPpPPPPPPPP QP ICNN WN WN PP O
ON O:NNN 00N QNNNNNNNNNNNN 00N >MM WN om NNN Z
Ill mc=/ Qlll 011l lllNWlll N llIWWWIII III 011l >Nq Wlll ON Qelfl W
40 M 0 0 0 um U o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 um U 0 0 q 0 QM W O O (A
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O O O O O
0 o O o NetO o 0 0 0 o e
O O O O Rle Nlllw/l O O O O OPb O
b M1o00Wwm t}11
N N M O O o o v N
.may 'ytiy MMIlo NEOM1
b.+ N.•�.+.I P bNNNNNM1M1ID 1 b M1N N Ill b blip M1
b o .•I o o e b .•� O>>>>> •'I M M •-1 .1 .e 1 v 1 '1.y .•� M .• M .•� M 11 Ill b
WN MNNN N.+ OOOOO OIll If1M1MMNM o.i N.+.e N.+ N•y .e It ap M
OM M(O aOm bP eMey l-I rl M.y rIOPPPN bM OM1M1 .eb MN oNN M O
ON ONNN ON OKOL d'OC d'p POi0O a0P Olt ONN O.I ON OO
Ob Obbb Ob OQQQQQM1M1.'IN NN11 ON Obb Ob Ob
O O O O O O O O O>>>>> N N M M M M M O P O O O O O O O O ••1 O O
014
3
10 0 O O O
W O O O
1 »r l OO O
I d N 0 1 Ill Itl O
W I W70
(� 1 1 Z 1
Q q Q 1
IL :r2
Q
� W S
1
rn
I O o nNnm c O O O O o o O O o o MMeO o o O o 0 o e
Y � O o nMmn n o O o O O o O O O o NNOo o O O O o o O
NN
�M m .b
W Z � Ifl •1 � P� o O O o O O O O O O P P Ill O Ill P P Ill Ill 1[l Ill
20 1 M O O o O N N O e Nlfl n P P N N P P
U O N M Ill I N 111 O o o O n n O O M •-1 e e V b b N N
Q 1 O o .. .. I[l Ill .. .. .. .. N N .� .•�
m m as
Y Y
U U
.. 1 W W
O S S
N 1 U U
0
M
b
O
1
W N
r
Q W
p � w 2 s • • ,« * r s • �
Y J J J J J J J J J J J J
U 1 Q Q Q Q 6 Q Q r N Q Q Q Q
w r r w r r r r r 2 wQ
W r r r r
2 O O O O O O O W ZK O O O O
r U r r 3 r r r r r L 1-1 w r r M r r
Kw
C' w w N w M w
J 1 Z Z O O O O O 2 O O Q QW O O O Z O W O
O W q qp_ O q_ q W q r� p
_ _
i Z Z Z C: Z Z Q Z U Z C. Z J Z
QO 1 r W W O W = W W W W W rrr W W W X W a W
>N Wd 1 ow > I•. > O > > > Q > > OZZZ > 0 > W > C. >
O\ WWl M Ur UU Q N - ZWWW O O
IYo rU 1 0 rIQf11Y W W W Z W 1 WMxxww C: UI N
dM U. m W"IJ w r r Q r JWW W a H r
1\ fA 1 L <w<44 W Q Q w Q Jrrr
Qb W I w wwww q m m Ol m
e p l W C!CICC: Z W W Q w QCmm O O W
W of QCl r..rr � �-• z U QQ W i U
M •
7LL 1 1 ti
r0 1 1 rI
1 O ooOM o M M O M O0=c o O M
ON 1 i l i l 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1
2 6 .. ........ Ill M M 1I1
W 111 �t �}�v � M M V M MMMM Ill n Ill
y
X 1 M .......1 .. M M .•� M �T �t �t �1 Ill .•� Ill
W 1 '1 MMMM 1l1 b b Ill b NNNN N Yl N
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 O O O O O O O Ifl O O O O O t[1 �1 lf1
�O 1 o eoOo m o e m o 000e o m o
oz l nnnn o o .. o In Inlnln In -� In
V
U .y .� ..1 .y .y - .y .•1 QM
Q O o000 o N N N o000 0 o O
LL
� O
W .. .-� .1 .y .. .y .i .� .•1 .•1 .y ep .q .y ^I .i ..
ue
W O .•1 .•1 rq .� .y .•1 .y ON
q W a roe 0 0 r 0 O O o O O O O O o O
N N N N N 09 N N U N N NNNN N N N
YQ 1 \ FI\\\\ 0 92
Uq 1 o gO000 OQo o >o Jo �t too 0 o e
W M MMMM M SM M 1'M OM .. ..MM M M M
2 \ Z \ \ \ \ Z \ r \ \ W \ K \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
U C. b O b b b b O b K b b N b Q b b b b b b b b Q
O MOOOO 1•'IO QO O O UO OOOO O O O =
Y 1 N r r i N rc
Z 1 Q O 0 0 0 0 0 Q o o Q O O o ' LL
o 0 o O o o 0 o 0
m 1 Ze U' oeoo CCo alto LLo ro O o00o SO o wo
Z I W r C: a' J z w W r .V. O J
M 0 1 Z .0. r. M 0 r wI'^ L Q
O O I QOZ 1 n W Z r Z C: J U
LL 12 W J J q U d q Q Q 2
P I C: d IQi nai N 6 U >
J O
Q 1 Wcwo 1 W >M R'bnnn Mo wM 2M OM ^M ^NOM�i wM =M ..n N
U 1 O.W 2 MP W P P P P W P W P p P UP Z P Q M O P P n P OP > P rI
ZN dNNNN L N QN ON ON ON Y....NN ON ZN WN K
wM illllllll M Llll =M Qlfl QM OM ONwIAM um Mlfl Ill w
p Q I> p am " 0 0 0 0 r10 no J O Z O Z O Z e o 0 0 d 0 N o N o >
O O000 o O O O e mmo0 O O o
\ J Z 1 >
o1a
MMn
1 0 o O o 0 o O O O o 0 0 0
\MO I W o 0 0 o O O O O o 0 o O
bL 10 N
=04 . n N
J P
O •• W ..NmP N m
WXW 1 OU n PO..cn M.. N bb 111 P o
W-CO 1 Z�•. b.-1 bm OMn b0 V.
bm V. b.•I P
QC: 001 0.. Nee?� we N.. N.+ 1/1M N.+ n N. N.
Ob..bb Oa bm bm wM bm IO b•-1 bm VP N
WOr 22 ON Oft 111 �t �T OC. ON oN on oN o 0 1 oN oN O
R'w. 1 WTI Ob OOo00 ON Ob ob o0 Ob Obn�Tb O.. Ob Ob O o1�
LLaU . > 1 0o OMMMM oU OO Om Oln oe owMMM 0.. oo Oo O
, OO oPONooO.-�O NN Nit
i W ob . . . . . . . MM M .
»r ,
O . a PP O m . b I[11[1 If1 M
� dy0 � IfINPNn411[1 I[1 ,ti �tv vn
� W S
W N W W W N P N N
(O W b b 1l1 If1 Ifl {(11t11(11111l11t1 O b
Y ••I b b vet �}�?�1vvv�i O o
U r i N N N N N N N N N
L �
sssxsxxxx .�
� N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
O SSZSSSSSS
N � UUUUUUUUU
o �
M �
b
O �
1
W
r OOOCi0000p +�
Q Kd•K KK 4'6'6'R' x
p aaaaaaaaa .• **
Y J J J J y Ik
u a a rrrrrrrrr as w.
W r r MMMMFINMMM rr �'�
S O O 0000pO00p 00 �w
ri W S' y OC UUUUUUUUU OGO O*
.+ O� x O Z z 000000000 on W.
-cc H� S Z O Z f9U'(Bf6U'U'www wo X*
QO r � W S W Y.<444'N.00Y•4 >" X+
> N S LL. K > LL > a Q a Q Q a Q Q Q > r� W
ON Wrr . O LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL �
OCO ra l r W O J
a M N U. a J y y N y y y y y N Z Q
a\ y. >
a b W. W 0 J J J J J J J J J S O
O O J O W W W W W W W W W r
w w S 333333333
�LL a
r 0 � N Itl O .� N ,••� .n M .� .i .•� r
N N O O O O O O O M O O
O y i r
OW W WNWeW W Z
x
v v ..vvvvvvvv co
r b N O.+..NMM11 N.%
Z O O O O O O O e O O O
C O O O O O O O O O O O O
� CZ, M v ONtiN.y .a rnvb
Q O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r4 M r1 ,-1 M r4 r4 r-1 '1 M ,1
a N N N N N N N N N -
u
ULi O o NNNNNNNNN
W M M y N N N N N N N N N
S \ \ y \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
U Q b b W b b b b b b b b b
..o o z000000000
Y Z y Z O y o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
t0 O W o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o e e
b Q LL J 01
N i w W
Z . W J R' O
o O.402: U 3 01
LL � 2 a
P �•+ � LL Z Z LL
J I N O O
a - O. NMNn yna�P e.yN MVW
U'Owz. ZS WN WN
WM WM Jbbbnnnnnn
JNNNNNNNNN
I!1 If1 W M1f11[11f11t11[1 If11t11[1
o Q�» >o >0 3000000000
N r O O O O O O O O O O O O
nnrnrnnnn
O P M x Om ti O O O O O O O O O
MMJ � O I[1 00 OMMMMMMMMM
b L � N �t O aD a0 a0 aD ap ap a0 ap a0
p.. W ••� o MMMMMMMMM
W- Ol.i Oti If1 f0 v000000000
1'aO 1 ZPM inn nooe000000
Q K 1 00.
0. 'NC P N N N N N N N N N N N
Y.O>Z w MNM
O obbbbbbbbb
O r . Z Z MN MO O Ifl Itl lf1 M 1[1 I111I11[1 W
aaU.>� o0 on ov va0tvvmtvvv
016
Mom
W
16N21
W"IrO dI
W I 1
Q I +pQ I
a I�z
I Q
Iw S �
i
o Obrlll 0 e e b b Ill O O w r r Obb N M M e O b b M M
Mbb b
Uf I . . .
WZ I oo Nro M P P N N 1l1 w N N e o nPN P r n w 0 P P r r
2 O I 0 N P rl r �t �t a0 m aD a0 N N .-I .1 P N Ill
U0.
N M M 1l1 r b P It1 w + •+ N N b b
.I
O
N
N
'1 I
\ I
n
o �
i
W I
F I
Q I
I
Y I J J J J J J J J J J J
U Q Q Q Q Q Q 6 Q Q N Q Q
0 0 0 W 0
x F-
2 O O O O S O O f 2 2 M O
F-U f H H F- w H ~ zzz ~ S ~ z Y ~ d ~ O ~
I.N. 4Q6QQ C a 0! J OC 0 d .
w W M QWW w 4 w d w d Ol Q M
J Z fF-HFH O O O O O O W O =Mo O w O O d O
0 1 ZZzzz p Z O 2 O O J p w O O O Z O 0 O O
J.I I FII W W W W W Z O Z O z J z Q Z Z M O P z W z 0 z z W Z
Qe HI w'wwww W Ir W U w Q w W W U W ZWW W J W I -I W w W f W
>N Sd I > f > J > I -I > N > Ir > >NN > U > f > Z > 0 >
ON W" I zZLSS U Q d' J 0""
WN I HwI Kd'www O O } W'J
M. I I-IU I 00000 z O 1- w d wQQ
d\ I N I LL W w w w F O N w Q } O O O f OL s
Q r W I . .. I -I rl 0 O Z m U Q Z z f N W O
O 0 1 zzzzz z J Q J N JQQ O Z d M
J LL
1-O nnnnn M o �t M Nrn o M P .+
I -I O e e o o m M N o 0 1f1 M M It1 Q O
x m
W MMMMM
N �1 o M M MWIII e N �t M
z I MOOOO O Ill o o O COO e o Ill e
ZO I 00000 O O O O O 000 O O O O
OZ I rrnrr M Iq O r .+ MMM O M 1l1 .I
U I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ti I I
U
I Q I 00000 O O O O o moo O O O O
I
W Z
U
Z N p
pW r NNNNN o NO e e Oe0 O 0 0
\ H I N N N N N N W N >> N N N N N N N WN N N N N 2
Y Q.I N N N N N \ ON W N \ \ N N N > N N \ N O
UO I NNNNN JN d'N WN N N NNN W. N N N I -I
w .1 .4.X ^I .4 W. O.I N.+ .� W.
2 NNNNN ON Z\ \ N N N\N N \ \ N U
c.l rrrrr r Sr r r rrr LLr r r n
0 0 0 0 0 No U o K O O o 0 0 e O e O O U O F
r w O
z e o 0 0 0 a N O LL O O O O O O N o a Z O Z O N
I m I NNNNN QO ZO I.10 O O W000 WO WO MO I-10 G
w W 2 > J ~
Z O = Q U Q J S U
b W I Z •O I L LL W O
W U W w U j
M 0 1 Q_Oz I U
ZU p OC F y r1
r-I ILL -I I d I -I N Q d'
W U d Izi O z Q W IA
Q 10MO I 0P 00 KM "a I -I �1 N d.1 Illbr Lb WM F-M On I
U I OWZ I UN�IllMlll QM mm KQ OM Ill zb w
.n IZX N M M M M M > M W M W M U M U M z M M M 3 M 00 00 -co
J
.1 I WU Jlllllllllllllll Jlll slll zm wm 00 Qlflllllll Slll 00 d111 Ot 111 Q
O Q I>> Q O O O O O 40 Q O Q O Q O Q O 0 0 0 0 IA O W O W O W O U
N F I O Ooeoo O O O O O eoo 0 0 0 0
\ J Z I >
M P w I g
.07 I O o 0 0 O O O O O o o O O
NMO I W o O O o O O o O O O O O
rL I N
owQ I
O••
W S LL I O U O P b N b b .I Ill �? �1 �1 0) m r co b 0 O e-I 1l1
OCQO I ZI-I rPOmoo Mo P .IM I/10 PN .I mP ro 00
Q0 OO I .1�}llill XX 00 Nn o.l MM Nit obmP r.t NO PO NM P
woY I O>Z I LL1 SSSis M. OCl 00 1l1'N vb Oobb II1N Ow NN bb Ill A
wwF I ZZ o»»> OK o0 00 om eo OMMM Oo olr oo OP o n1
ML u I >Yn oY>YYY OQ o0 0. Oe Oo OMMM Oo oQ o.+ On o
ddU1> I OJJJJJ O> Ob O.I Ob O1I1 OMMM Ob O> O^1 O111 O
� O O
W
Y O r
� QZz �
U S
a 0¢
a -rz
� LLQ
00 e 0 0 Oo O bP.IM P Pe P O o M M Nv M O o 0 o w w
Y 00 O o O Oo O OONN O PO P O O m m PP P O o o O b b
clr
W z I O r 'N b v Oo Ill Illvvb O wP O O O m m �� M Ill Ill 0 Ill O O
S� � Iflm M O O vM f� M••� b O m P Il1 Ill P P •-�� N N N N N O O
U0.
. v v P .y w Ill v P .+ •+ w b I� M M w w N N Ifl I[l
1
w 1 1
O
N
N
w
r
O
W �
r
a
O
Y O J J J J J J J J J J J
W J r r z r G r r r r r r W r W r
S rU O O Q O r O r O O O
W Wm 2O O O o O w O
r J r
N W w R' W a' W L z r Q a
w z r a' Q a' W a' w W a' u W w w w w z w J a• a w
J Z. OZ O S O we O wJ O JZ O O O O Z 0 a 0 = 0
O I w0 O L O w0 O W= O mW 0 0 0 u O O u O O 0 O
Jw w. aL Z z 00 z rZ Z wW Z O Z> Z z J Z Y Z Z
Qo r. 20 W Z W . I W ra W w W z W Z W W m W LL W W W
>N La W W > > zZ > J QQ > OU• > Z > > > w > > z >
O\ W. rr J Co Q mu W-C w C �'
WN rm W W J ww w) a m W Z 3 W r
a.1 "U . xw 0 wo M: .+ Or N r O 0 W Q
a\ Z. uu a• wx W(L lm mZ R J WQ O Z K
af� W. zZ Y mm ra#a >w 2 W Nu z 0 W
O O 00 ¢ xx aMYY WQ W L w w a
W uu LL W W SZrr YL > M SY 3 a O
W.
M LL
rO NN O NN NNeo Nw o NM
w mm o O O mmNO v O ma o N M
.
Z Q b b P b b b b M M b M
W Illm v mm mmvV My v lf1 vv M v M
IL
x w w w w .a .r N N .•I b w .� �t w. w
W mm o mm 00.-, .-I w -I N Ifl W N M N
�T �t N mm Ill v vv v V v
r Il Lh O MM MMOO 00 O
Z Om O 00 OOOO 00 O O 00 O O 1I1
O O. 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O 0 WOO O O O
02 MM O ONO f�f�OO CO O 41 MM Ill O Ill
c.lIN. r
NN w .•I 0ww w M w
¢ o0 o Oo 0000 00 0 o moo 0 o O
.y .. Z .'I .-I .1 w w Ill Ill Ill Ill Ifl w w w .•� w Ill w
a
r Z
_ 00 Z Z
O .'. .'1 .•I .r .•I .•I .-I .-I .1 .'I .'1 w w .-1 Q .'I .'1 w
OWN -00 LL O 00 N O O N 0 0 e O e 0 (.DM O Z O
\ r. 2 N N N NN N N N N NN N Y N J N N N N .\
Y Q . O \ \ W \ z \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ U \ Q \ \ WI \ \
U O I w NN C m O N N NNNN MN N Z N U N N N N ON
W I rww ao www W.-. O.+ O0.S I U \ \ U \ r \ \ \\N\ \ \ \ f.l• W" \ \ ON
\ J \
i u WON QPP rrnr r 6r rrr mr r or
o[oO rzoo
. . So oo Oeoo Zoo o e uoe we o =e
I Z . ZOO W o O o 0 O o O O w Om O r O woo Z o a W O
Ip I ZOO r O y 0 0 O O O O = O O CDC Q F O WOO w O O O
H U Z W L W O a
Z. W Z S
¢ S N 2 W W W
z r J
M 0. Q O Z. J J r w O Y c u J 2
W W r O
w w w J w
wLL m O LL Z J Q r i
Q I O w O. ,Tv _ W m w v v = 0 0 0 0 O b b .10 O m O M M r m M O N
UIQWZ. wmm ae 0mm ONNNN NN rM MN ViMM ON Sv rr
.1 . Z z . J M M J N C M M a' M M M M 3 M M w" S M Z M M Y M 00 Z M
.1 ..Wu . ainm Qo ¢Il m Qlllll mm Omm Wm 00 Omm mm =Ill �Ifl
p Q.>> I u O O u a• U O O U o 0 0 0 U O O U O U O U 0 0 U O u o U O
N r. O o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 00 O o MO o o O
��'•"• �� O O O O O O
NX
O O O O
meIQ-Z • bNWm NO
J I N m v w N
O •• W
m molno MM a
WELL I OU Ill MO O N-o. /lv NNO l N M NIII I� m illO
Y.QO I Zw O MIS ONw.a NPM PIS hw Obb
Qa' Co. P w0 NOV,Ob O�OWN Om Ill.'I mbb Ill a N.
O>Z I W orI MVM oPPPP obl� MO �t- MYI III It11� vm IN
WOr . ZZ OOw 0.�I OMw OMMMM or-+ ON o! ONN o.P ow ol�
w . OMM ON OMCNN exx O. OL Olr
aaU I >M IS llm ON ON 011l
O
100
W
I i7rl
MOM
W W r O l'J I Z . I
Q ^OQ I
a �rz
X WW I
N N o O p O e O Ill M V Ill N V O O P P O O M M V Ill .•I P m IS
1/1 Ill O O I[l Ill O o .I V O Ill V O Ill,
Ill Ill O O O O V N
ur . . . . .
W Z I M M O 0 N N O 0 O�N�N V P P rl I -I 0 O V V 0 M w N
I S= I O M O M .1 i•I r V QmNOo P Ill Ill N N M O M M N� V VIA %T
I u O I P N N N P P M C N
I S I
Q I o O N M M N N M M
I I
rl ^I
^I 1 I
O ;
N
.Ni I
r
O
W
r
Y J J J J J J J J J J J
U I Q N ¢ v1 ¢ Q Q ¢ 6 Q Q ¢ Q
Ir r w r r r r r r r r r
= 1 U o> o .+ 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0
r U I > r Q r J r r r S r r r 0 r r r ow r
INi N Y. G a.w 1 w J w W d w IZ1 w M X w' W PWI nWI Y.
J I Z I Z O W 0 O O O O O O ¢ O O O O JJ O JJ O
O M M 0 0 z 0 O Z O S 0 = 0 O ¢¢ 0 aLL 0
J .I I-1 I rl z ¢ Z z O Z JJJJJ Z O z Z r Z M z rr z au z
60 r 1 r W S W W W u W Q¢QQQ W rl W rc W 0 W 0 W ZZ W » W
>N S1 I Q > U > Z > J > uuuQu > r > r > > Y > W W > wo >
O\ W.. r X Q ..... u u J O Y.K
W N r W I I••I M r W IMM IX IM Q O W W
a a o rrrrr z u .+ M LLa ww
a\ ti I 1 w o UUUuu r I -I u I .... U.U.
¢ N W I Y r w O W W W W w 0 > W w >> U LL
p z. I-1 a a 00 00
w S Q O a w W W W W r•I U N ¢ W W u u
K•
OLL I ti
r0 P o P .•I NNNNN M b N- r1 .1 PIS
rl � ,r eD ti M Ill Ill Ill Ill 1l1 �i aD o e O O N N
Z Q
W M N M M W W Ill Ill Ill MIA
y
X �t .1 .+ .+ .I Ir I-I'I'I .•� P M .I 'I'I 1111/l
W I N Ill N N M M M M M Ill .•I rl Ill M M .+ .•I
N NN
1 Z O O lil Ill 00000 O O O O 00 00
1 00 I O O O O OOOpO o o e O oe 00
OZI Ill O Ill In r N In r r M Ill .•I M N N v v
u I I I I I
V p .•n r•� rl r1 r1 r1 rl ¢ 0 .••I r1 ra rl rl
o r o 0 opeeo o p 0 op o0
.-� N r•I .� ^I rl �•I r•I'1 .•I ^I rl .i .-1 .-I .-1 rl
yl .y .-1 .I .I .+ .1 r•I ry rl rl .•� u �•I .I 'I '1 ^I U
OWI O O O O O ZO O WO ZOO OO
NNNNN M
\r I N N N N N ON N f9N rINN NN .
Y¢I \ \ \ \ Y\\\\\ \ hr\ Q\ \\ \\ W
uO1 N N N WIN JNNNNN N rN ON N JNN MNN >
W I N �•I U ••I ()'1 M r1 .y r1 N .•I .� Q .•I W N r r1 ¢ ti .•I W .•I .•I I -I
u I \ \ Z\ .+\ LL\\\\\ \ ON 3\ z\ r\\ U\\ r
u r r ..M rr Orrrnr r on xr wr ZNISWOO >00 Q
•O O O M NOOOOO a w r0 MO WOO >00 W
Y u W O K O CIL1' w•
Z Zo O OO �!(.I000o Oo OO O u
0 lre 00 WOO f.l
m we a No ooOMM o Uo No Wo =oo Noo w
0 U. C Y
II1 r¢i I W rl O r 2 N S > W W Z
U r 0 W W S » W
b W I S •O I W W r r W ¢ F" O H p w
M O I QOZ I Y r Z Z J Y 3 ! 2 w
.� Iw•I I Z 6 w N = S w U O N u 0 u \
0
Q I Mwz I N Vlb 1'M 1cm R'OOOOO QM 0 2N O1ll MM rv�t Z
u I ZWZ I ¢M >M ¢M Qlll wNNNNN zM ZO rN ZM Villllll WM111 X
.I I ZS rM >M 1M dM WMMMMM ZM ZM .9m OM SMM 6'MM 6'
.-I ..Wu On O41An Ulm00 UlmOM Wllllll Ylll O On nN ¢Ill Ulll Jllle I-11[ M U.
p ¢I » qo On DO OM OooOeo On 00 WO WO WOO LLOe U.
N -r I O O o O o 00000 O O O O OM eo
\JZI >
�PI-I I p p p p o O O
\MO I W O eO.• o O O o 0 0 0 o O e
I••I rl r1 ^I N
I`S I N U 00OOO ISN.O (7Q 1 00000 N 00
J I n IllN.-INw P 00
WSLL I OU M PN V N VNVNISN PN ON v P POO to P
p•¢O I Zrl M IOW O .•IV NVIl1M.1 f� W0 M. b vM mom MM�t P
¢6' 001 O.-I NZ MV .•Ib OO. NN. MO M. ON VM =NN W
me1 q>Z I Mb bJ OM O.-I ONNNNr•I Ow NP OIL =0 ONN MINNONN 0
WOr I ZZ no OJ MW OW Qwwwwo Ow OIL OP 00 OVV OOp OD o
dLLU1>� I OM 03 ON =W ONNNNN O> ON OM ee mct =Q� 019
i O q
W
Cox
N O I
W.O.
W �
a �rz
� LLQ
� W 2
I O o O N NV q' �t V o O o o �t f� �1 Ill � •� O o O O Ill 111 O e
wr
W Z P O O M M N P •+ •� I� r O O b b P P
O M b
U O : b Ill 111 v IT O O
� I
� I
I
rl I
ti
O
N
N
rI
O
W
r
Q I
p � • r � a r r a r »< »< �
I
Y I J J J J J J 2 J J J J 2 J J
U Q a K Q Q Q Q W 6 Q Q Q O Q Q
2 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0
rll � J r z r LL r r cD r r J r a r r r a r o r
rM I I N r C Y C I -I Dl 1' C K IL K K W S
J I Z I ON 0 U 0 O r O r O O rrr O IL0 O O W 0 I•M O
10 O Q W Z O N O O ZQZ O O O O N O q
J.M rI O r z z Z K Z Z Z Z O Z Z <LL4 Z N Z z X
Z Z Z Z Z
QO r I KO W r W w W Q W 2 W W W \ W W W O W Z W
>N Sd 12 > > 2 > S > > > SNS > J > > > U > Q >
O\ W w W U m Z a N
K N r u I 6 O Q J W M W O w X O >
LL.n I•MU I ZY 2 2 Q 3 W 40-0 w Z Z UI z
a\ 0. QU u Z I S a.Ma W O O w Z
SO U W CD 2 a Sr2 r LL LL W a
o O I O r 6 U Ir O OL W W Q W W Z D!
W S N W hM N � LL >U> Z OC GL W r
K
O LL
r0 fir o W O I� N o00 N e o 1l1 �t
I -I o o �i CD o Ill fit' Ill Q W O o •M M
ON I ti i I i
=Q Iq ltl M M N Ob MMM b O O N b
W ltl Ill �T �t M Ill 111 �T �t Q lt1 .� M M M
LL
X I M M P M •� + �+ N N M .•I
W ..I rM ••I .� M .+ M .+'I .� M �1 �t .+ N
I �? V Ill �t �t �T It tll Itl ll1 �l M M �1 �i
r MM O W b M �f o0o M O O �t �t
= O O O O O MO MO O O O Ill
OI OQ MOO O O O O O O
Z Ill O O O O
O. �•� O f� •+ r I� M M Ill
Q 00 O O O O O 000 O O O O O
'1 rl Ill rM •y nM ^I lIi Ill lit �I rl •-1 '1 '1
7 Z m ^I M '•1 "I N U rl N= M
qW 1-1NN O O O O 'J'O NNO O O O O
\r I N N N N KN N N N N N N
YQ I W\\ \ \ \ \ f0\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \
UM. >NN N N N N N NNN N N N N N
W rM .M .+ .M .M .M 0.
0 N o I� W
WOO R•O o o FO �O wmmm MIO e UO F
Y w Q
Z U o o WO 2 0 o Q o um "MOO
N o Q e a K o 0
m Om > o (DO W o um O o r O O O r O um o O e o ^
M Q I W O O O Ir K O U I -I O U U
Ill I•M I Z O 2 Z r Z O Z N Z Z
Z I W W O ) O N O P Q Z W Ir Ir
b y I M •O I W U' r S Z r O q Q w
M O I a 0 2 I C U
I -I S O O K Ir N LL
LL 1. 2 I (D N 2 U O U Q LL H Z Z 2
M J I R O W
Q I Owo I zwP WM ON OM Wo WM JMMN OM NaD o rat Jet
U I OWZ I `MMM W" wMM Wit lq 111 MM�t wm Wb ^f� .Sill Y1 Y
'M I ZS trMM OM QM OM ZM '-IM WMMM 3M qM wM 0M ZM U
WU 011llll wm011l Zlll wlll wm Illllllll <0 wm wm HO wN O
O Q i> O I LL O O (D O S O .0 Y O Y O J O O O J O J O J O J O J O J
N r l O 00 O O O O O 000 O O O O O
\JZ l >
M
..M I a
MO I O O o 0 o O O O o 0 0 o O o
\MO I W o e o 0 o O O o 0 0 o O o
f S No
o W Q I
J I
WSLL I OU P aD ll1
DL Q O 12 I -I P b M N I� b P M b N n P P a MD
QK OO I a MP Ob ob - OW wo " MN NO NM MN PM o
mm0 OP mo �?.M OM 00 MNVN IIIN bit b� bb I11111 O
WOr I ZZ I ON�t OM ON OP Of� O.M ONbN ON OP OP o0 Obi e
MCu l W" ONN Ob ob oM eM OJ Orl�l� ON 011l OW Oft O.rM o nn
adU I y I /O
.a
.am
� w
co
z.
0z
W W w O .
Z. -C
Q . ^OQ
d .rz
�LLa
C O O N N o O m m P P
m N N P w O p <G P P e O O O O O aD aD O e
WZ NMN m P P NwJ e o obN P 0m O o
2 O� N M w b �i �t m w b e o M M w 1� a C O O e
M
a
O
N
N
i
n
O
W
r
p• w • x • • a • x s �
Y J J J J J J J J J J J
NN Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
W Y r r Ww r r r r r r r r r
2 W O M O O O O O
QZ r O O O O O
rU Y r w r QO r r r r w r r r r r
N x o W MO w wd' d' S d' d• K N K K
J z r O w O \ O O r O O W O O O W O O
n O. S W O O O w o q d• O z w O O r O O O Y O O
J .•� w r " Z z N Z W W Z W Z w W w Z z Q Z z Z w z z
ap r W. W W ro W > W QKw W W m W W w d W W
>N Sd mJ > U > QO > O > Zwr > J > a > > N > M > 0 >
O\ W. i J Q Q > J Q U r Q
KN rrc QUw N dm N m w O Q z 6
L. w x W bbm a K J 3 O m
d\ M. W W W r W W LD w Q a w
Qf� W. ZJr Z SZ Q 2dl 7C r N U x H 0
O O WwQ O QQ r WYY Q Q W Q 0
W LDLLx U ZZ 0 >rr z x O U d O
C •
�LL
F•p nmN Nw m 0 M CIf1 OOo N 1? M O
O m m O O O a �t V V 0N
Ow .1. 1 1 1 1 i
zQ MMb m bM M MMM b C b M b M
W
d
X nPw Mlil w nww n �} w .� P n
W Ifl w M I[1 w w If1 .� w w M N N n w M
r Nom O Mw w OOO M a m 0 m e
= aw 00 O 000 O O m O O
no. man
m 00 O 000 O O O O O O
O Z. M It1 r i-i v M O O O f` I[1 t[I O I[1 O
UU 1 1 1 a 1 n 1 n .-� 1 1 ill1 1 1 n n 1
w w n w .-� .+ w w M
i Q 000 O 0 O 000 O O nO O O O
I[t w It1
2 N
W nww w w.-� w .•�n w n U.� w w rn
O nww w wn .+ tinn w w rn n ..� Un
OW: a== o 00 0 000 0 o Qp e o 00
\r NNN N NN N NNN N N 3N N UN ON
Y Q \ \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Z \ O \
i UO NNN UN NN N NNN N N ON N wN d•N
w
x \\\ w\ \\ \ \\\ \ \ O\ \ a\ \
U om m =r rn n worm n n xr r Ur wr
.O 00 O w000 o e DO O wO y0
Y r W
Z o00 d0 MOM O r000 f..f0 a m0 O WO QO
m OOo Qo Ooo p am= zO O Se a SO 30
M Q U;M3
U K w G Q
ILl w i Z M Q r W J w z r r
Z W w p ; d' w 0 W w W LL W O
b d• i -a- 2 Q ON > J Z z 0 O d W
dP
M. W- Z- p J Mgt z d Q J z W O O
a W
W Y Q M Z ^
Q i Qwz MOM Zm OMCCmm mm rNMM zm ^a OM ON Jm A� U
U OWZ YNNN wl mom 1,, ZMMIt1 WN QW w-o rM QN mf� w
n � W U U M M M d• M um m U M O M M M 3 M a�10 m r M W M X M M LL
n 1 WU Omtf o QW Umm wQ OWm OO Om QW wm wO am
o 0
N Q >> J 0 0 0 MO i O 0 S o zoom MO i o Z o Z o MO Z O O
N O 000 O 00 O 000 O O O O O O
\ J Z 1 >
MPw i¢ O O O O O O O O O O O
nM��O O MN o O
Nmalw o 0 o O e O o O O N
ni .0 m
O f9Q 1 b0 nN M
J b O p
O •• W NN vQ
W=LL . OU NM wMM m bm mPw f� w
OCQO . 2w i W=ON C0 NMM b o N N NO b Mw N v
ad' 00 eo0�1 w� Nil N I mm,-i bl-i m NO o IANNo NM o
dW> . O>Z OOOw �?b o0O lm [ mwl w Nw m bb w m> bb O
wOrIZZ OOOb Ow own oP MCCC op o Oo 0 0> MW, e
pC d'w Ww OQmiC Ow OOO 0. mvvw OP Ob OO Mo oZ OM O
OQmb Ow oNN Ow Obbb Ob OI[1 on OI[1 ow ow 0
021
b I K
.Op
W
I YDrI
I aN21
W W w D 1
U' I Z I
Q I ^pQ I
d Irz
I IW=
1 I
m Om m bN
Y mM1 o O o O n n In 1/1O
ur I . . . .
WZ I �mwM Il1apQ w o o .+ w NOn o P P M M �t
== I Mbwlll M1 b b O O o o wV w M1 M M �f �T mMw M M M N N N
U O I
Z I w w b b w w M M Ill Ill
¢ I O O
N ri
O
N
\ I I
N I I
••I I I
M1
O
W
r
Y J J J J J J J J J J
U ¢ ¢ 6 Q Q Q ¢ N Q Q 6
Nl r r r r v r r r Nz r r r
= O O O O o O N O O X W O O O O
r U NNNN r r r r I r N r r .zmO
00
r r r
w I IWi w w IW-I K J Ww w
J I Z I JJJJ O Q O I O O O O O O W O OLL\ O O O Z
w I 0 1 dddd p Z p m O p N O o p w O r O Z w
Jw I w 1 dada Z Z o Z Z Z N Z J Z Z z z Q
¢p r 1==no W r W O W W N W W d W Zzw W 0W W Z
00
>N zd I N0 > S > N > J > z > U > d > W WZ > w > >
O\ Ww I CA a QMwm > > ZZx N K N r rr l W W W W x w J O w o N N W Z ¢
www
M. wU I UUUU Z w m d 1 1 1 d'p fA Z
d\ N I wwww a Q W PPO r r wwK I w I
WQW I LLLLLLLL W
Z
w 01 > W G=ca w www W
0000 O K dNNN
U U KrcK z in �
C
�LL
r 0 N w w w w w N w n M1 M1 w w N N N M1 In
o00e M O Ill 0000 o M o00 0 O N
qN I IIII I I I IIII I I III I I
ZQ I bbbb w Ill b Illlllll mom
Ill b Ill Ill w
W Y1 Ill Ill I[1 Ill V Ill �t M M M �1 Il1 Itl N N M M �t
d .1 .r w Ill Ill .•I w .•I M . m w 1/1 M M w .� .•I Ill
X I
W I wwww Ill M Illllllll Ill N wwlll ill I11 w
I I
r wwww N P M ,T.mP b MMN N b N
2 I e0o0 O m o w�t N Ill Ooo
Oo I e000 o M1 o M1mmm m o eoo r m o
OZ I NNN� Ill
U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I
U I omw .1 w ..� ..I .+ ..I ..l ..� ti w w w .-I w .•I w
I Q I 0 O O O 0000 O 0 00o e O O
i i N Z
I Z O
W w .1 .•I w .a .•I .1 W w .1 .r .r .•I w w .1 .+ w .•I rl .•I
O w w w w w w w r w w w w d w w w w w w w r w
pw1 NNNN 0 o O 00000 o eoo 0 o Qo
\ r 1 N N N N N UN N Y N N N N ON N N NNNN N N Z N
Y Q I \ \ \ \ \ Z \ \ N \ \ \ \ UN \ W \ \ \ \ \ \
U p 1 N N N N N "N N N N N N N N 6D N N N N N O N
w w w w w w w w N .... U . w K w w w .+ LL w
c.l rM1rn r on wr wnnrM1 wr M1 m 0zm 0
un wn
e000 o wo ro xooee rre o 0 0.
Y r a d W w Y
Z Oo00 a 1.10 UO 00000 WO Ne mmmO O r0
m NNNN O �JO O Y.0000 ZO r0 w(.JO O 20
Ill w 1 r r O UI a[ O w O
Z I W O N d' x Z r r U U
b m I Z • O I d Z O d W W N J w
LL > > LL W
M LL I Z�Z I O
w J I Kd W Q S Z r W N O x N
QIOwoI UbmPn OCb QM Ow wNNNw rM wm SnmP uc rw wo
U I O W 2 1 w o 0 0 o r n 00 r M Z M M M M M m n d n n n Ill n W M
w I Z S I LL M M M M M w M r M Q M M M o 00 -Co J M M M w M w M > M
I WU LLlfllllll m zm ¢Ill Q111 Jllll/lil m mm =m Qlllll m mm mm ww
o -,Wu
I>> O o e o o Om d e d o d 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 W O o o w o mm WO
N r I O NNNN O O O NNNN O O 000 O O O
\ J Z I > b
w M a I O O
\MOIW owwww O 0 e ee e e O o ow
1
n Z 10 o 0 0 e p
01.9¢ I 0000 oe
J I - N b N 0 M M1m N O
q •• W mbOP
WSLL I OU wNb Nm Ob w �? M b m M1OMm M1�t �? bn
KQO I Zw �tON1110 Mm Y1 Ill b P n Nmmm Nit M1 mo
¢[Y I 00 I OMnn."I r'10 O Nn bNM1Nb w N N000 MO N 00 - ^^
dfAY I q>z I oNMMM OP Illw bill ll1P�t �i �t b bm OOOO 011l OL` WOr I ZZ I OmPPP cm 00 Ob OMlil 111111 O OM1 Owww 00 Om OP (J_
ddUl>.w. I O1l1I/1111I11 OM1 Ow off} o www oN ob O�tllllll ow OM1 oP
r 1�
1 o q
W
I Q N Z I
W W.O.
(9 1 Z
Q -qQ 1
d I LLQ 1
I W 2
Y
UI
WE-
Mn,
uol
= 1
Q I
w
w
O
N
N
r-1
r 1 I
O I
1
W 1 1
F 1
Q
q I
I
Y
U
W
2
F U
•N.I
J Z I
w O I
J w w I
> N Z d I
ON W w I
LCN HC I
d\
dwUI
N I
Qr W I
O O I
W
� I
�LL
f O
w
ow
C ¢ Z
W
a
X
W
H
Z
O O I
O 2 I
U
a
1 I
1 W 1
O W I
\ H I
Y Q I
U p I
W
1 S
1 U 1
1 1
Y 1
m
M Q I
W w I
ZIW
b O I Z •O I
M O I Q O Z I
LL I Z
w I d
w J I OC
UOwo
I OWE.
w I Z S
IWU
o Q 1 »
N F 1 O
\J21 >
w M O l \ M o Iw
nZ IN
004
I
• J I
q W
W L o I O_ U
Q Z I 00 I
d 0> I O>Z I
woH ZZ
d y w I W w
d d U I> I
O b M O V O N b O O M m O O O O O O O O O yI 1f1 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P V V '
�} N�}O�•IOnwO•?n ICI ICIm 0000000�fNOb OIC. . . . . . . . . . .1[. ICI b M M
V VmNr.+mboPb ONVVbOommNmOVONOMPNVObemobP P M M `
N MOMbV VICI n ICIV ICI PbbbwNN VICIr PbnVPmVmPNbmPVmMM. V r r
M MN mIf1V ICIM ICI + P NbNNw.a ICI orPVVNV ICIN P m Vwr .1 w w
.1bnNM rICI ICInN P VN I[I V ww w O .+ w
VN wMw rl N M
�.I N
Ik N
)k Ik
Iv
J
J .•I w
J K Q Q
J J
Q ¢
6d
Ww
HO
fH
OH -g6f�gQOQ»O¢-OQ+'qQ�'q6»p6»p¢OQ
N W W J Z
OH O
>U
N O
wwY ZN OJ J¢
Z xx F
\
IL WZd< WHO 2
X. MW
d' N OC
K
O W W W W W W W W W W
OC W ZWO W
z
O O W N 3 J W W Q <WZ Z XZ <ZZ U d'O: Z
w
O W O
g w O
q
p (0\ N Ud dNW
XY ZS 2
Z Z
Z 4<44Q4444Q
Z > ZU Z p
60dU ww2 ON
W d W
W dOKOOdOOKO
W W JOw WOU09 JWd
U[L'JQ
> d >
y
w .i w.rwww w.•Iw
> q WwJOC3>O LLZCZ\OOC\ZOOOC
JZF-mW0¢ CZNWNOJWNNJd'WJJZWWN
ICI QZ¢OZH d'WSZSUWZV2WOCZ6QQZW\
N
NNNNNw. NNN
\\\\\\\\\\
wa'O COdw NW w w>w >WwHHOCwd'N
www wwwww.rw
-Zw F HfJOJOLLww<wwwLLw"WddWHZJ
O
y y y y y y y y y>
r W W w w W W d w O LL W LL Q W W N LL W w W Q Q x W W w
O
LL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
OUdJJKUZNUQ d'Q HOC OCx ¢KNKUUF-d'UZ
d
w MMN�PMY1r 1[I
O/•Iw ��?e1r-1w.-I '1.w ww.i .1 '•1w w.1 .1 ••Iwww.1 .•Iw
M
O O N N O w w w O N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I
11 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I
O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I[I N N N N N N N
M
b b b b b b b b b b
MMMMMMMMMM
.rMMM
. . . .MMMMMMMVIMMMMMM .
M
www.-1 .lwwww.s
. .M. .
a0.1.•Iww.-1 .•I .�Iw wMMMMMMMMM-INNNNNNN
-1
ILI
NNNNNNNNNN
Nw.awww w.Iw w000000000If10000000
NNNNNNNNNN
NQVVV•iVVV�rrnnrrrnni[Irrn nl�rr
V
1 I I I 11 I I I I I I 1
w.lwww w.awww.rN N N NICI .Iw wwNNN
V V V V V V V V V V
W ICI ICIW NWWNNp
Ow.-Iw
0000000000000000000.10000000
O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m e o 0 0 0 0 o
O
I[I ICI ICI UI I. ICI ICIwWWww.rwPPPPPPPPPwPPPPPP.
M M M M M M M M M
M
�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I
I[I ICIONMbbbbwl[IWNWbbb
I
w .I .Iww w.lww
o Oeoo00eoo
.+ww.1.Iwwww^I
0000eooOeoVVVVVVVVV000Oe000
0
w rlw w.-I .1 .aww.-I
ww.1 .Iwww.a .+wNNNNNNNNNV V V V V V V V
w
F
Z
d
O
w
W
pr'1 r•Iw w'l rl eiw w'I
wri rlw wwrlMwwnl rl '•Iw'I rlMww'1 rlMwww'I '•I
r'I
H
w.lwww w.•Iw ww
wwww w.•�.-I.+ww.r.rw w..�.lwww.l .-I .•Iww.-I .r .l
.+
O
Q
LL o 0 e e o 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NNNNNNN N N
N
Z
.
O
C N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N
WwwNMwwwwww
1••Iw.-NNNIINNNN lNNNN.-Ir•Iw
ww.H.•INNN'INN
w
z
w
Nrnrrrrrrrn
nnrrrrrrnnnrrnrrnrrrrnnrrrn
n
O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
j-•
� O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
Z
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
O
Y
N
U
U
U
J
W
W
>.
O
O
H
o
•e
a
N
w
N
K b n m P O w N M V ICI
2 m N M V ICI r m m m P b m V m m P M N m m O N b m w r m
Y V
W
.ICI ICI ICI ICIbbbbbb
QPmmmmmPPPPmmPPPmPP PPPPPPPPP
M M M
KI[1
Q M
M M M M M M
ICI ICI N ICI ICI N N W N N w ICI N ICI W W W M ICI w W W w w W ICI w
2 1[1
w
OC
w tC1 W W w W 0 ICI ICI ICI ICI
LIC o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 e
�
C O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
N O
0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0
e o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O O O O O O O O O
O
W wWWwNwWWM
P P P P P P P P P P
b b b b b b b b b b
N
w-I.1
co
b
M c =QMM O O OOO
mm==MOOM0Om
II1
VMrmPONNVI[I .rw NICIOnNVbrbNMrwNCOP
Vr
m
e
I
Onl[I ICI I[Ib bnnrwbbbnnbbbrrbbbnbbb
b N
V
V O O O O O O O O O O
==Om=cnoo0
O m m m m m m m m m P m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
ON
o N
O
O O O O O O O O O O O
e
p
e NNNNNNN
N
N
w
0
023
r�
r p O
W
I Q N 2 1
W b
W
r W.D.
W
1 L r
Q
Q Q 1
d
. l- z
r LLQ
r W S
Oo
O N
N .�
H O
o m�HHMIII IIIONNHHMPNMP HIl1P ONr
M
n0
n O
00
o H
H M
M O
O ONHP4. .VMVMry Na. 111
b
Po
P o
U
WZ r
If1M
N m
O N
N o
. .a0MOOI/. .
O HNNlt b�tHeHobnPrltHbHHbONb
b
MO
M e
Sp r
OW
M v
v H
,..� �}
�} blil ap PlflbMbaO P YI IIIONHHHr blt 111 111
r
011l
1[l N
L r
N
aDM
N
b
1
N
N
r
0
W
H
Q
�
s
O
�
a
•
r
r
1
J
Q
J N
Q W
u
6
Q
Q H
Q
Q
w
S
z
2
H
O
f
O Z
f
O
H
O
H NNNNNNwwwww NNNNNJN(/1
H
Z
H Y
■.0
N
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W d W W
wwww
N
Y.W
�
�
d•
Q� HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHdHH
K
-C
K. w
J
Z r
ow
O
O J
O
O J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
O
L
O LL
H
Or
H
q
n
G 6ddddWdddWddddWddd6WN dd
A
a
J
Hr
LLL
Z Z
Z "�
z
Z
z
2 6WddWWdddWddddWddddW dd
z
dN
z
z N
.•�
Q o
F r
C
W O
W
W
W > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fA > >
W
U W
W
> H
> W
>
> N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z N N
>
ow
> C
O\
d• N
W H r
H K r
J O
Q f
f
Q
W
LL
O
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W H W W
ow
Z H
H
d H
H U r
a
W
Z
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q U U
J
Q
d\
0.
W>
H
G
7
H ............ H H H H H H H d•H H
S
>
W
Qn
W r
WW
d'
Z
LL
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWLLLL
2J
J
p
q r
H J
K
O
W
LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LLLL LL d LL LL
n a
W
W
LL W
H
Q
Y.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n d
d'
I
Obi
N
11
O
•-i.yr•+.i H.�.�H H.yneHH.�.y .aHHNN.�H
ate
V
1-O
H
r
M O
II1_
O
O
O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O
O n
O
ON
1
it
r
r
r
rrrrrrirrrrirrrirrr
W
It M
Ill
M
M
Ill 1/. 111 Ill Ill tl. Ill Ill Ill I[. Ill Ill Ill Ill I[. Ill Ill Ill Ill Y. .
d
x
HP
H
P
N
0MMMMMHe4 Hlli IllN V'lt ltQVlt ItHHMH
HH
H
W
WH
M
�}
HHHHHHHIll Il1H H.-IN NNNNNNNNbM
MM
Ill
1111
11
11
M
V It It 11 O V' 1. �. Vet 1. 1. t. t. 1. �.
It It
r r
It
r
1
. . . . . . .
I r r r l r r l l r r r l l r r r r l r r
MMMMMMHHHHNNHHHHHHHIi�HH
1}V
b
H
2
1p 1p
00
�}
0
(O
o
a
e
OOOOOOOOOe000000000111 I1100
00
O
D O r
O O
O
O
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O
O
Oz r
Mlll.
r
hlll
M
HHHHHHNMMVlt 11 111 111 111 ill 111 OlflOWbn
r r r
nn
I r
M
r
U
U
H'1
•"1
WH
H
.r r r
HH•-1 rlH Hr'I r'1HHMrl e•1HH-rl M r•1H H'1H ^I
r'1 "r
H
Q
cm
O
S O
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 e o 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 e o
e o
0
H
••IH
r'1
W•"r
H
H•-1 'IH HrIMHHHMHHHrIMHHH'I rIHH
HH
r
Q
w �
HH
Z
aH
r'1
r'1 rMH r'1r'1e'I H••�v'1 r•IH H'1 ••1H Hr4 rlM rOHH'1
Hr'I
d•"I
7 1
HH
LN
.'M
r'IH HrI 'IH ry 'IMHHH'IMHH'I rIHH Hr-1 e-1
r'1 „•�
p W r
OM
e
o
e
O O O O O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
N
OM
U N
U N
N N
N
Y N
N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N
\
Q r
\ \
ON
H \
\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \
N
C N
ps
U0.
N N
UN
"N
N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N
pN
W
^1H
H
JH
r'1
."IH."Ir'I r•�Hr-IMHHHrIH H'I rIMHHrI 'I e•IH
HH
H\
S
\\
Y\
a\
W\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\
ar
U
drn
Jn
Mn
Zr
nnnrrnrrrrrrrnrrrrnnrrr
rr
O
J O O
d 0
O O
H O
W O O o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 e e o 0 0 e o 0 0 e o
0 o
Y
1 Z
J O O
IL
00
W O
J
O O
U
Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O
I
J O
0
J o o
N o
0
O
Q
= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b o
W O
M
Q r
W
a
d
Ifl
H r
z
41
U
-
d
ZrW
z
r
p
'r z
N
H
O
J
z
H
H r IL
d
U
W
N
w
J r N
w
SM
H
LLP
W
J. M PbnMMPlt ltIPPPPMOMPN
WNN
Ne
Q r OKO r
JEO (O
dNN
SM
HM
HM
zb
dHHMMMMHHHM.�.-IH H.-r .s'+.n M.IM H.-1
-IomM
WNN
Nit
U.OWZr
Z
L M M
H M
M
.9m
a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
N M M
Y M
H
S
Hlll 111
Llll
011l
Hlll
Hlll 111 111 111 111 Nt[1OOI[1I[1 OIll IIl NIfI 111 111 111 111 111 111 111
WI[1 I11
Slll
.,Wu
I
N O O
WO
00
WO
o
ry
Q r>>
f r p
O o
0
o
O
O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 e o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 e
e o
0
N J
Z r >
M P
H r*
e
o
\MOrW
nL
r N
o
.p
Ill lllo Nl11111111 Illb NlllHmVlt Mlllb rmnv
v
OWQ
r
bNlfll[1 111 111 lllW Ml[1M HIl1MMHOH�i M11Mo
v
J r
NaOHHHHIl1MnHe011lmn000HWHOH
b
O ••
W
M e
Mb
nP
N
a0rMo00onmMOHnnWMraon oaoO Hlt
N
NP
WELL
r OU
NNH
bH
Vo
r
It 111 111 li lT �t �t baDM b'P a0b0 Ma011 m11 oltPP
Ill
Pb
d•QO
I ZH
PNH
Nlll 111
JM
blll
N.�
OnNaD CD fO WItV NODHn VAIN rr nao lnmHH
Ill Mtn
(00
Qd'
I 00 .
w e
O N
O r
b H
o if b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b
M b P
y r
d Ur
Y O> Z
o
OM
eW
OP
ollllll 111111111111111111111 lllN 111111 Yl 111 ul 111111111111111111 Yl
oblll
eH
woH
l zz
onn
ON
OM
OM
O.-IHH^•IH.1.•IH.�.1�•IH rI �•rH."1 „'I �'I •'I r'I ^�^�."1
OMM
0.1
ff O
MM.-W.
d d
U l> r
Obb
O b b
O N
O N
O Ill
O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
O M M
o
P 1 W
O O
1 W
Cor1
1 QN21
W W 0 1
U1 S1
Q O Q I
d .rz
I LLQ
I W 2 1
'v 0 v o e o 0 0 0 0 e e o 0 0 0 e o o e o o e o v v n In n O e o b n
00000000000 O Oo O o o nONO1l1 b OOObO
Ur 1
WS 1 000 O O o o O ol[l l/l olnvnYl000 .I no O v v mNONv n eo l/ NO
SO 1 Nv O) O o N N bbl/1v bMbYl ltl vl[l O ON O M M WYI III IIIP M bvN lll
UO
¢ 1 r1 r1 N N v .•
M
.1
ti
0
N I
\ i I N
^I I I
\ I
n
O
W
r
a
W I Z r r r W J r W r r r
0 O r W ZJJJ O r O O O
-toZ r OKWW
MW r J6 r! r r
N 1 U Z ..rrr 6L W rrr
N r W W P W U rzZZ W M W Q W W ZZZrr
J 2 1 W O O O O Jr JQUUUJ O W! O i O O
O! 0 0 Ow r O r Ow O W r O L O O E <<<M
J .1 r1 1 r W z z N Z W W N W N r r r W U Z r W z 0 2 Z S L S U U
QO r 1 Qr W W W rd Wr NNNr1-1 W QLL W N W W JJ
> N i d 1 > IL > > U > Z I d Z N W W W Z> > L Q > > > X X X d d
O\ W W Q > O l X 1 O Q d d d O W N J N N Vi N W W W W W
W N r wl 1 J N N U W W S U O U W ! 1 J W W W W Q Q Q
6.. 1.0 1 W QQ> ONOM N rY O 1-1.. I -I r1 dd drr
d\ N 1 1! Z r r W d W r i M n P r W d W Q Q¢ a U 1 1 Z Z
Qn W 1 ZJ /;J Z NOi mwuli-iC Ww LL ! WWWW> ZZZQ¢
O p 1 W 1+ O W rl O Z W W r r r W W Q O Q W W W W> O O O J J
W aY N U dJJSdmNNNdm NJ d W W W WS »-+dd
W
�LL
rO CC b .. OOPOOOOOONN no a bm0 bvvNN
r1 00 �1 o NNI/1NNNNNNIl11/1 NN a I/l Yl 111 mlfl m 111 PooOO
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Z Q CC b Ill N N M N N N N N N b b 00 M M M M M O v v b b
0
W I MM Ifl v vvvvvvvvvWW vv f0 vvvvv. 0MMY11ll
d
X P P -1 ti .•1 .-I .1 .•IP .•1 N N N .•1 .-0 .+ .•I P .•1 .•1 .•1 .... .� .� ...•I .•1
W i .•1 .. M Ill ItIN OO..NNNNMM MM o I/l 111 111 lflO III�OMM
v v v Ill v v v v v v v v v v v Cc N v v v v v v v v v v
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1
r no M M NVInba0vl/lll moo oO O ... O=O =QOMO
$ 00 O N OOOOeIIIIIIIf MC= on O OOOoo 00000
0 1 00 O f0 O O O O O O O O O O O no O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0
OZ I IIIN n .. MMMMI/l Ill III ul lnnn oO o MMMMM MMMnn
(,l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1
¢ no O M O O O O O O O O O O O O on O W O O O O O O O O O O
.� .y .. > v .•1 .•I .� .-0 .•1 .r .a .-I .r .•1 .1 Ill I[1 .•1 O .•1 .•1 '1 .-I .1 '1 .1 .•1 .� 'I
M r
U �
m
W ..1 ...... .....
O W 1 000 o On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 no r 0 r 0 0 0 e e O o 0 0 e
\ r 1 U N N N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N . N N N N N N N N N N
X Q 1 \ \ \ O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W \ Q \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
U O 1 W N N um Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ow N N N N N N N N N N
W O .-I .1 2 .r W .'1 ...... W O N . N N .111 N .•I 11 ... N .•1 ti
> 0 0 On no
O O e o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 no = 0 Z 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 F 0 0 0 0 0
X W W N
Z J o o 00 O U O O O o O O O o O O o ow r o O o o O O o Q o 0 o O O
01 Woo QO 002OOoOOOooOoO (.fOO O 1-1ooOeo UooOeo
U z • w O r O
Ill la -I 1 1 d I•. Q G N _
Z I W d W J 2
M 0 1 Q O 2 W ¢ W J d Q O 6
S Pn Q Z U 0 U W
J I W W 2 r
1PoOOOPOonOo CNN WO r.vvvvv QM�t
Q 1 OWO 1 NNN - b ON
U 1 OWZ 1 NMM ON
M J..NNNN..NNMNN mMM ro Ql/l lfl l/l ltl 111 rNNNN N
W M M n M M M M M Z M M M M M
.. ..Wu 2Ill ill Om=Ill WIl1 Ill III Ill Ifl Yl Il1 i[1 Ill Ill Ill 7mm zo .Ill Ill Ill Ill111 FINWWOW
o I>> r e o r o r 0 r o o e o 0 o e o o e O r o c m W "J' O O O O o > O e o o O
N r 1 O - no 0 0 o e o 0 0 e o o e o o O O 6 e 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0
\ J $ 1 >
M P I x O
O O O O O O O
\ M O I W O o o O O o 0 0
n S 1 N
O Ur¢1 1 nM
J1 I Pb WWNNn..Nlllben .. .. ..MN
O •• W 1 nb MONNOOMbbv.. m
WSLL I OU 1 NPP nN P OOObNMOn1 mo. M MO Mwn " .. .. .. ..Ov
WQO I zC Ono Mn ILl bOOPOOOOOOO.•1 O bn .0mooM I11b
a W 0 0 1 Ono o O o O N N .. N N N N N N N N P no .. O O o 0 0 v P P P P P
wo0 lzz 1 vnn ON 011l 0OooOooOooOo MCP M.
bvvvvv NPPPPP
WOr1Zz 0.1.1 ON o0 oeooe000000e Ovv 00 ovvvvb 011 11
ddU 1 >. M.. olMll obbbbbbbbbbb ONN ON onnnnn =00000
025
o I rc N
Oq a
w
i Cox
or
1 1 �
d N I
W WM01 N
= 1
a ^qQ I In
1 LLQ b
I W S
1 I
I 1
1
1
O b10 Ifl a P O O O ON
Y ob0 v + + o e o eP
Uz . . . .
WZ I Only m v v V v Yl m
So 1 o^IN M M M o e m mltl
U O I N .1 ^I M M N N If1 Itl N
b
rl
N
0 1
N
N 1
rl
r
O I ;
I 1
W I �
I i
Q R
q M Y llt llt Mt i
y J J J J N t
U Q Q (A Q Q W�
S 1 O O hl O O+
f U 1 f H J H Y f f >k
p.
0
Z 0 Z 0 OZ
S
'r Zzz N W *
O I <a=sX J 1 I
.y I s O O 0 U qw+l
scau z Z o z z za+
Qo I f l JJ W W U W Z WX•
>N SLLI yLLLL > > > Q >Wr
O\ WN I KKK d J s
1nl wU arm W w a <•
6\ 1 N I I ZZ
Q r 1 W I Z Q Q N z z O
O I q 1 O J J w O f M
Q. J
LL ¢
H O 1 v N N r r m f
ly 1 000 O O N O
O N 1 1 I H
ZQ vbb Iff N M
W M 1f11f1 M M M Z
X
W M M M tf1 'I N R'
�t v v If1 v v U'
I
Z
Z 000 v O O
o z I r r r .r rl If1
U 1
Q o00 0 0 0
'1 N rl v rl M
1 1
1 ;
1 W 1 ^I ti r'I r4 N r'I
1 � 1 ^1 'I r'1 N •'I N ."I
I \ H I N N N F N N N
I Y Q I \\\ H\ \ \
l U q l N N N N N UN
U. .y >ON�M
U WOQM Ne O f90
Y ¢ z
m IQ-1000 QO NO N.O
M Q I U Y W
W Z I W N K O Z
M O I Q 0 z l Q m 3
.1 w l Z1 W Q N W
Q 1 0=0I QNbb ^•+ ZM ON
U I =WW Z z l Z N N N W M J M Z M
I ZS ZMmm wm JM oM
.n 1 Wm >MWN W0 WOItl
o .,Wu
I>> > o 0 0 30 30
Y o
N 1 O 1 0 0 0 O O O
\ J Z Z I >
M a«+I W
NM O I O O O O O
\ M O I W I o O e o
rs IN
o UI ¢ I
J I
WO I OU 'If1 "+
G'<O I ZM M.M1[t m Yf NP M O
Qy Co. vPaa vQM m
wo+ NV
g I q>2 I NPPP Iq b ov
rlZZ IOIII 0.1 0 0l
ww.lw. IO hl hl hl O r'I O O ^I
d O.0 I> I ONNN Orl opt O'I
IOq
� W
Q N Z
d N 0
W W O
N � ILI
Q +06
a -�z
� LLQ
1
1
O
o O o 0 0
0
o
e
o
e o
0
0
o MO
o b
b 0
o r
r o
0 0
�C
o
0 0000
0
o
e
o
0 0
0
0
0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o O
ul-
w z
Ifl
Ill O O o o
O
Ci
C1
o
O b
b
P
P no
O n
o e
o .•I
.•1 O
O ti
SO
Ill
if1 =%M Ill
O
r
r
O
O P
P
P
P Ve
V b
b b
b M
M Ill
Ill O
I[l
u O I
+
b N N
r
.+
•-I
V
V
b
b P O
P
P
P P
P
rI
rI
.a
O
N I
\ I 1
N I
ti 1
\ I
r
O
W
H I
Y
Q
U
Q
6
Q
Q
Q
Q
6
6
6
Q N
F-
o
2
0
o
0
o Y
o
0
0
0
0
o O
1... U I
H
f
h
H
F
W
f
f
f-
1-• W
F
d
IN -I
C
CC
CC
LC [C
tC
K O z
w
w
w
[C N
K
J I Z I
O 00wN
O
O
O 0
O
O O.
O H
O
O W
O
O
W W W W
0
Q
q u
g
d
O uQ
O z
q
q y
O UI
q
J I M I
rI
z >>>>
Z
Z
d
Z W
Z
M
Z 1-
Z H
Z d
Z Q
2 O
Z
.•I
S
W OPOO
W
W
I -I
W 0
W
S
W JW
w Q
W rI
W W
W J
W
QO H I
>
>
2
>
>
N
> Qd'
> L
> S
> J
> O
> N
>N Zd I
N
>
VI
Y
W.
U
N
O\ W".
d•
JJJJ
OC
W
OK
l0
U
Q
CN F-CG I
W
QQQQ
Ja
v
w
w
u
I.
3
3333
W
w
Q
I I
L
m
O
J
d\ NI
w
W
WWWW
m
K
W
w
JJ
2
L
I
m
lC
Qr W I
L
ZZZZ
w
W
L
CO
Z
W
W
>
>
Q
o 01
W
WWWW
W
I -I
W
>>
>
L
U
W
2
d'KCLC
w
m LL
f0 I
M
MMMM
m
M
O
M
rr
O
Ill
b
O
M
p.I I
o
oo0e
O
O
M
o
00
V
o
rI
M
V
qN I I
ZQ I
I
M
I I I I
MMMM
I
M
I
M
I
.•I
I
M
I
Ill 111
I
M
M
M
•'+
V
M
V
W I
Ill
Ifl Ill Ill N
N
Ill
V
M
Ill Ili
V
Ill
V
d I
X I
O
MMNN
•-I
M
ti
.•I
M M
M
Ill
P
•'I
W I
rI
O o o O
Il1
^I
Ill
^I
^I .•I
.�
.y
.•I
.I
v
.•I
of
v
rrrr
v
v
v
v
vv
In
v
v
F
.n N 1% N
V
O
V
N
CC
o
,
Z
o
000n
a
o
0
0
00
0
0
o
O
o
o
MO.
0
noon
e
o
O
O
o0
O
O
O
O
Ill
o
O Z I
V
P P P P
M
_
b Ill b
.�
.+
.-r
'I .•I
.r
.I
.I
.+
^I
I Q
O
VVOo
o
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
•
O
W
u N N V V
•'I
.'I
U .�
.�
ti .+
Il1
.•l
.+
rI
U
W
O
z
I
K
N
7
-
Zn0"I
.r
.q
n
qW l
WQm
ZNNmom
0
0
WNo
ON
Orl
Wo
N
WNo .
UN
N
\f I
l-N
ZNNNN
N
N
\
UN
N
\
NN
W\\
N
\
KN
O\
\
\
I
H\
W\\\\
Z N N N N
N
N
N
>N
> N
N
N N
N
L N
N
>N
> N
N
uM-Cn
U q I
I W I
N
J r+
d r-I .•I N .1
.•1
.y
y
.'I
.-I .1
N
F
.+
\
W.+
W\
.y
\
2 I
Q\
O\\\\
\
\
w\
\
f-\\
\
rIN
S r
r
N r
r
I U
d r
J r r r r
r
r
N r
r
Q r r
r
30
o
o
rIo
Woo00
e
o
O-
o
Woe
we
YO
Y
z
U
Iro
>
WOOoo
-0
o
Y
F-o
o
W
Uoo
>
rn0
Y0
o
Fo
O'
O
W
ZO
mOoOo
O
o
0
0
OO
no
e
O
r Q I
w
O
Wn0
Z
L
N
2
o " I
L
K
a0 w S• O
Q
Q
w
W
/-
Q
U
W.
0
aW0
o O I Q O Z I
Q
U
Z
LL I Z
Z
z
J
f\9
I-•
w
J
QIOdOI
WN.=
dP
l
zbr
Jo
WM
LLM
WP
3 V
O.n
f Ill
MM
HVM
V
umUIOWz
I-1 .� .•I
Ill
N{O
O V
WO
J. I
o
Xo
WO
.y IZS
Jn
JOOOn
d0
LO
zo
QO
CCOO
o
I-10
QO
QO
HO
.1 -.Wu I
QO
QOOOm
QO
UO
WO
>O
mom
J O
J O-
Z O
MO
2 0
O Q I>> I
U O
U O O O O
U O
U o
U O
U O
won
on
o
O
O
o
O
N O
o
M W O M
0
o
O
e
\ J Z I >
MPM I ae
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
e
O
O
.IMD I O
O
O
o
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
\MoIW
o
e
o
0
r L 10
o W Q I
O ••J I W
[C
W
m
Nr
P
b
M
N
I110
.•IM
If1
WLLLIOU
OW
M
r
rw
MW
PO
P
P
V
OO
b
cQO I zl-I
OO I
IllZ
VO
M
OMMMM
co
V
N>
NO
MO
l
V
O
NV
NV
bP
NO
Vr
o
Q[C
Y I O>Z I
OU
.•IPPPP
Mf
VO
Nr
ON
ON
VOb
MV
OM
.•I .'I
Mo
ON
en
0
w
ww. I zZ
OJ
nPPPP
OJ
OZ
OV
O.-I
U
OII
N
o
O
O 0
027
d M u I>� I
= I
O N N N N
O S
. 0
O .bi
o
O N
r
O b
S
M.
N I C
O O
W
! r I
I -Cox
1
W I W I.0 O I
W I i I
a nOQ I
a �rz I
I LLa
I W 2
I
O a O) e o 00 0 00 0 00 a =c=O=QOOOQQ O O o O o o)b
I Y O b b O O OO o M M bb N 000moubb00 0 W O o O
Url
WZ I P P ao b b 0)A
X=I O 0) 07 r r PV �? n f` OJ OJ b m�?Nb101 �t 0l 0)Nbr v M M i� r .•Ie
UO I 41 v N N nm b P P 00 .•I brbM�lrMMbf`tn M l[1 N N N 0)f0
El
Q � M M .•I .+ � � �- M M b b .•I .1 b_ b M
.~•I I
I
0
N
N
.1
r
O
W
r
Q I
Q • Ik llt llt 11( 1 M[ Ik
r r
Y I I J J J J U J rZ J J J J
u I I a Q a a a a z 4•I a
o aIXa r J (7 r
x I o 0 0 o r s o C a [0JJ o\ o 0
NU r r r r G r iC r U U mFH r ,rll r r r
I -I I C C JJ ..••II III Z C U C C WO
ZI O 0 2Z O O -r 0 wwwwxuuu O O O Ww
OI p 6C 044r=M ONM LLW
rI . z O Z O z z Z z z z 0 z Z z
-cm -1 W W O W W + W OW W Z0 ON0NNSiC W w LL
W W 2
> > W > U > wZ
O\ WI•I I C Y s I W NJJNSLLLLINNN LL ox
1 .•I MU O LL QO N .•IN NNNNNNNNNNN Z r QLi
a\ w l I o!w
rl � .•I � .� ..I ..I .I .1 .+ ..I .-I .1 .•I ..I .4 O W op
C
M O
no N
rl I O rl MM .•I NNIf1bNNNNNNN .•I N .•lo
no I I I I I I I I I I
I 11 I I I I I
=a I M M I. -I M �?V NNMNNNNNNNN .•I b .-10
�fbvVb. .�t �t �. M W M.•I
a
x M .•I .•I .+ N .'1 P .'1 .•I .•I .1 .1 P .•I .� N N N .'1 .'1 .-I �?
W ..I W �� ..I 101 .I Ln to 0 M Ln .•� N N N N N rl to M M
I I I I I I I I I I I I
am
O bm NV1011l1boDV�i101Nlil .�I .•I no
_ e O Oe O oO oeeoo0Y11f11f11f11(1 O o 0O
p l O O 00 O an 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ifl O O O
pZ I .•I M MM O . 1MMMMMMVINMNIII P M f`O
u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
U .y .y .•I .� N O
Q o O' no 0 no e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .•I O O M
.•I .•I .•I .•I Itl .r .•I .r .•I '1 .-I .•I .•I .•I .1 rl .•I .•I M .'1 .•I n
I •
W r .•I .•I .•I .•I n .•I a .'I .•I .r .•I .-I .1 .-I .•I .•I .1 .1 .•Iti .r N .'1 .•I
D W I an 0 0 o Z 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 e o 0 o e U 0 0
\r I ON NN r•IN UNN NNNNNNNNNNN N N rr N.N
Y a I W\ \ \ \ \ 'IN
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ > \ \
U O I 0! N N N N C N C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N
.•I .•I .r .•I O .+ O .'1 .I .1 .•I .� .r .1 .•I .4 .1 .•I .•I .1 N N W .•I .-I
U �r r arr Ur arr nrrrnrrrnrr r zr -rr
W O O J O O N O W O O O o 0 0 0 e o 0 e o 0 o rl 0 0 0 0
Y M
Z W O O J O e O J 0 0 U O e 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 o On I+ no
0 p e O J 0 0 U O W o 0 Z O e 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 o i 0 U 0 0
W
o IQi I = 0 z J LL .•I N Z
z I W W 0 0 Z q1 !L Z Y w
a C I Z • O I RI = J I -I p W
O O I QOZ
LL I z C C O (0 Y O
N r I 1 a a X A Z Z Z Z Q
.r J I C N W C W
a I OCO I O a W1 Jbc alp 0OMM." YN"NNNN0�ODMVb a. -I WZIT= G=M
U IZWZI r iM <M Moo UIM U== JNMNNNNNNNNN On W= JMM
..� I W 2 W J e Q O Moo O Z o Y O O O O O O O O O O O O O o C o J O e
ti ..Wu 41 QO SO Woo 00 So0 CeeOeeOOeOee MO WO Moo
0 a l>> Z d e On Woo o On r O o r o e o o e o o O o 0 0 0 0 > O Moo
0
N r l O O O no O 0 0 0 on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. O on
\ J Z I >
e o 0 o O
.•I M= 1 0 I o O o O O o o O
\ M O I W I p o 0 o O O o
f�i I N I Pt0
o c9a 1 PP
J I MM rt` POOPMI�VMN=00 MN
Z
WELL I OU Ifl bl-I �10 N.+.I P NPP OPNr+Nf�P b101NON �t f• N rl ltlb
Of�f�
CQO I z.•I b b I vti PO)m f` Pbb b101 r11I1M 101 P.-I I�I�MI� Me P
QC 001 O rW OO NMM ^I �? =a= ON�1 .•IN MN. -I b 111 N Ln Mb PO �1 Yet , w^
LL f.OlIO>ZI rl to �? bNa. .I u1W eb Vf`r, noon
OO=9Mw9M O0� OM �1 �•'I OLV
WOr I zz I e eb oN Oft �i O.� O.-I OooOOoOeOOOo o0D op o I I `M/
d I WH I O O.-I O.I OP1� OM O.•I .•I Obbbbbbbbbbb ON OM ON.�
a 0._u l > I
M 1 K
I Y D F I
I Q N Z 1 .•I
a N�1 w
W
UI I L I
Q ^qa I v
IL �rz I o
I a N
rW S
I'
I
V O P
Y a0 O'•I
U Wz 1
1
Lot v rn
uo 1
x 1
al vv
1 0
I N
I I
I
rl 1
O
N
\ I
N
0
W *
H *
¢ *
q * * *
*
JN*
u aw*
W OK*
2 Off*
HU I Hf *
N w*
r N O.*
J ZI w OZ*
W qW*
J.I Ir 1 LL x
W*
QO f1 *
>N xd1 Z >W*
O \ W I I•1
6' N F- w 1' 1 L J *
¢r w1 0*
o q1 p F*
w 1 6
K 1 J
H O I O H
M O O
z ¢4
e
a � z
x v a
W M K
N !!
H O
Z O
�01 O
OZI o
u
U o
Q �1
r
W
ow l Uo
\f I >
Q 1 \
U0 1 S'N
W W rl
S N \
U r
J O
Y Q
m u o
Zlw 1 Z
m I x .0. M
O O I Q O Z I LL
LLIZ
N r•I 1 d 1 Z
~ a l 0= 0 1 q M
U I qwz 1 JNM
l zx JO
WU Mo
o QI» 30
N f 1 O O
\ J Z 1 >
MPhI 1 R
r Ma 1 O O
\ M O N O O
r x NO
o (pQ 1
J 1
q •• 1 W N
wxw 1 OU
0 zao1zor
aoe o N vv
wo.
a1 Z I V'1
lzzo1
KKI WW.00
LL au 1> 1 o-I
029
« (O
W
N
Q
O
1
Z
22 1
WR
xF 1
«
w
Q W
Q m
4
OL
ax
\
�
u
Z
1
N
1
F
q
�
1
1
O
1
a
1
w
�
1
a
W
m
1
x
2
N 1
W Z 1
u 6
O 1
>
Nz P Z
2 f
N
1-1 N 1
V
Q
J 1
f
1
Q
3
W 1
a
>
Y 1
W
f•
J
J
Q
W W
> •�
x F-
Qa
ae
2 q
J N
J \
1
WO
0Q u +
N
xOw
U
«
Zx
QV
ZF
Wu
Oo
OG M
> 1
u
O «
LL J
Oi
O N
«
W Y
o V
J W
1
M f.l
M
x
uQ
1
P
p
w u 1
r o
a
O
Vo
¢
q
N
f
2
0
2 W
w
O
«J
>
OO
0 6
W
O
1
H
O
as
J a
q
eo
a
w N
W
\
O h
M
o
Z
1
O p t
o
1
7 M 1
C
i-N U
N
¢
M 1
F 1
M 1
LL
K J 1
«
o
m v l
1
1
2
Y
«
u
H 1
M
W
MI
2 N m 1
v
x0
0.
u
0 2> 1
M
u O
o
p
u«
o
«
¢ f 1
r
O
awW l
>
.0.
«
WU WO
0
«
u o 1
«
1
N
AN 000 1
Y W Y 1
0
w w w
mp0
0
IP[1
NN333 1
1
O« J J J 1
W 3 1
v
p
w
P
2
«
»
u
Yf
«
O
O 1
O
« 1
> 1
W
^�
«
d
F
O
Q
O
N
ul > > 1
p
N
No
Z OWN
\
o M
«
«
o
z
\M
W21pnWW 1
QZ 1
\Q
Vx
mn !-f 1,
GCO 1
V2
oW
xoOC¢Q 1
0=
d
m ••
ZCulOW& 1
OW
Wx
Cmun.
O«
ON
w<
4
NC
+
ww
CD KKK 1-
as
cDOco 1
1
0,1O
w 0
i
Q �
w
Kw o I
N I
O w �
M �
J W �
Qf
U Q
q
,a
Q�
f �
ZW �
w J
O Q
Y
QQ
J 1
LLN
or
Z
YO
F- O
w ()
U U �
Q
a
D �
o
K
f!
U
W
2
u
q
M
w w N M 1
I PNzz= �
O Owiii
O e N N N�
w
v
w �
C �
W
.: a
o �
N z Y Y
\ � Z MIA:
P M w
w.r wz ww
mOo MOW4 -
= u W W Q.
q •• ZuowK
WZ QDU=
a� m M&M
aw o »>
W O C 000.
WW 0 COCK I
&0 WOO I
W
(O
F- 6
Z Z
� w
O Q
i Q w
C �
u
q
i
C
W
m
i
2 �
N
U Q �
C �
O F
>
Z H
w Q i
J �
W �
a
W W �
Z q
ou
z W_
W U
>
ox
W Y
Mu
W �
S
C U �
o
q �
Z
W
>
1
W �
O Q �
•p i
a
W �
O q �
� w �
O �
K N �
f �
w �
K J �
W w .
m u.
2
F x
ENO
;
oz-
U O
Q Mw
.0.
WWI
uo1
N
W Y
m O K
O
K 3
W
u
o �
0
W
a
O �
0. �
Z I
ICE I
WO I
w 1
F
a
N K
zu
-Co I
W w I
O O
O O
O O
O O
O o
0 0
If1 w
o O
N N
V V
P P
N N
M M M M
P Z P Z P Z P Z
W N N m
N N N N
O O O O
J J J J
i i > >
o c 0 0
w z w z
w O w O w O M O
Z N Z N Z N Z N
C\ C\ C\ K\
ON ON, ON ON
LL.+ LLw LLw LLw
J r J n J n J n
fu (u u 0 V O
ow Om om Om
O m 432 m Ow 02
m m m
N N N N
P P P P
M O M O M o M O
0 0 0 0
O o O O
00 MID 00 O O
O O O O O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
0 0 0 0
0 o e o
M
M
M
M
0
0
0
0
m
0
N
N
M
M
O
e
o
0
n
n
n
r
w
N
N
w
0
o
O
o
o
O
O
e
P
P
P
P
m
�o
v
in
e
e
v
v
v
v
N
N
O
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
P
O
w
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
e
N
N
N
N
\ W
\ W
\ W
\ W
e 0
0 0
e 0
0 0
O J
O J
O J
O J
N3
M3
v3
z
z
z
z
w
z
w
FH
Z Z
00
ua
031
1
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Receive and File Transmittal of
Treasurer's Report dated May 31, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated May 31, 2011 for the City of La Quinta.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in
compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86;
and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money
and Funds.
I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are
available to meet next month's estimated expenditures.
032
Respectfully submitted,
A4 tA
John M. Falconer, Finance Director
Approved for submission by:
D
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report, City of la Quinta
033
2
Titifl44a"
MEMORANDUM
TO: La Quints City Council
FROM: John M. Falconer, Finance Director/Treasurer
SUBJECT: Treasurers Report for May 31, 2011
DATE: June 30 ,2011
Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending May 31, 2011. The report is submitted to
the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Department.
The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month:
Investment
Beginning
Purchased
Notes
Sold/Matured
Other
Ending
Change
LAIF
Certificates of Deposit
US Treasuries
US Gov't Sponsored Enterprises
Commercial Paper
Corporate Notes
Mutual Funds
SubtotalI
$ 31,088,191
969,000
84,921,301
19,985,818
4,998,261
10,063,571
1,380,031
$ 153,406,1731
$ 12,500,000
15,000,000
$ 27,500,000
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
1
1
$ (6,000,000)
(13,000.000)
0
8,851
2.911
(3,399)
(9,839)
0
$ 1,476
$ 37,588,191
969,000
71,930,152
19,988,729
19,994,862
10,053,732
1,380,031
$ 161,904,697
6,500,000
0
(12,991,149)
2,911
14,996,601
(9,839)
0
$ 8,498,524
Cash $ 692,742 1 &3 $ 1,475,554 $ 782,812 1,475,554
Total $ 154,098,915 $ 27,500,000 $ 20,475,554 $ 1,476 $ 161,121,885 $ 7,022,970
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California
Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy.
As Treasurer of the City of La Quints, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated
revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of
La Quints used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York
Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end.
7 V67 Zol l
Date
John M. Falconer
Finance Director/Treasurer
Footnote
(1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from
the previous month.
(2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the
month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments.
(3) The cash account may reflect a negative balance. This negative balance will be offset with transfers from other investments
before warrants are presented for payment by the payee at the bank.
034
3
Treasurer's Commentary
For the Month of May 2011
Cash Balances — The portfolio size increased by $7.02 million to end the month at $161.1
million. The major reason for the increase was $25.7 million received from the County of
Riverside from the second property tax installment. Offsetting this increase was $12.27
million spent on pass through payments to other taxing entities, $4.85 million spent on a
SERAF shift, $1.7 million spent on Police protection, and $1.1 million spent on Capital
Improvement Projects. Capital improvement projects included $336,000 spent on Village land
acquisition, $107,000 spent on the Coral Mountain Apartment project, and $105,000 spent
on the Eisenhower Drive synchronization project.
Investment Activity - The investment activity resulted in an average maturity decrease of
thirty six (36) days from the prior month to end the month of May at 156 days. The Treasurer
follows a buy and hold investment policy with three investments of Commercial Paper made
in the month of May. The sweep account earned $66 in interest income for the month of May
and the bank fees for the month were $ 2,049 which resulted in a net decrease of $1,983 in
real savings.
Portfolio Performance — The overall portfolio performance had a seven (7) basis point
decrease from the prior month and ended at .41 % for the month, with the pooled cash
investments at .48%. The portfolio yield should continue to stay at these levels for the near
future. At this time last year, the portfolio was yielding .48% which reflects the current
interest rate environment.
Looking Ahead
The Treasurer is still concentrating on safety first and foremost. In the short term, the
Treasurer will be investing in Commercial Paper as opposed to short term GSE's and US
Treasury investments and has reduced the LAW RDA Account to zero until the Governor's
budget proposal has been finalized.
035
U
E
E
EE
O
U
N
a
'w
N
E
O
W
61
N
C
C
C
C
C
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
°
O
Z
W
o
c E n
8
0
$ y
d
a°
8
a
m
T
omU
U
U
Q
c
Nn tW/1
U
�
�
272
i3
m
N
p
S] O y
�
da
C
T
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
o
L
c
ct-
N N
m
8.a
co_ 8 co_ 8
_____
co_
N
A a
>
U
N
N
a
v`�>
°
o
ym
E a
p
p E E
N
N
O
f
O
O
O
c E>
d E
M N N N
N
O
�
N
N
O
U
,V�
MVi Wf9
Vi
O
O�
O
Cd�
UO°O
N
o
W E
K
w
w
66ESS
ass
00$00
0..
cN
�
�
N
o0o
fp000
o
g
o
li9
�
O �O OiO
r
S
INN N
O
O
O
O
Q �
Ip
m
w
N
In
M N,N
M
O
O
w
N
e
O O
N
O
O
O O O O
O
0 0
o
a e
e
e
o
o
p,
v o 0C 0
000
0
0
0
�
o$ o 0
o
y o 0
0
0
0
0
`\p
LL O
V
(O
O
ry
d N h p h
O
N O N
O
O
O
O
41
Q Q
q
O
N
N
0
lV
N
0
0
�O
N
O
O
O
" E
.000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0$ o 0
0 0
$ o$
SE
o
o$ao$o
.$0000
�aoc
LL
O
O Op O O O$
N O O O O
O
N O O$
O
O
N
p p
w
N
wa
cm
o p
o n
E
T
c
°
E E
Eid
Q
o
o d
U
Nm
79
Z
CO
O N
°
_U
C t
O
m
>
O
0
O O
N
N
N
d O O
a
Q U O
J
F
LL
N
m H N
8 C
N 0.0
w
Q
c
N O w
E
c
o
N ry°
a `�' m
Z
N
a
v
c
N 3 c
c aON
w
Z
0Op
��
�mU
o
Ym F
J$
Q8
tmU
'EAU
m
Nm
=8 p
oLL'o
aa8m
LLa
CLmi
E
c
°
N
°u
N
O
N
`m U m
m
'2
E U a E
E N d
p U,
c
m
E'c
m E u
c
m
z m 8 m
E
w0
p
U >.
d
c
m°
a
m0
c€E'
ELLxzx
Emwb
tm
FE
�,
V
>,
V
E
uo�
, ,
E
E
dm
>Vpp
_
r
a
N
O
V
U
N O
E
WN°
r
U
U
w
aJ(�r�
EC7�
J
J
a
E � E
c Q I
036
E
Y z
oil
Nz i
zl
Al
a �I$ i 3
vl
Fm,ml
MEN
.a�j
ValF
Jp
I-
l
-'e '�
pbXn
a'X
_EtX�
Ef Xpe#
ee XX�
>20
4io
ii--
iZo�n
>iaomn
_
q
_
Fml^,'i^
vlild
�"n .2
boa
_ ~
-11111
p33j�
0%'m
E'v•.nyE
v�Fii mm
3QI8 a
n-
=
�n $
o11
�
�=
lam
vl
-
g
�
o.
=
nY
h'
gl
;i
;i
j
of
w
w
a
nl
$. o
H MPH
3i
'"
vnx
DOF>
a
MIN
=„
wm
�J�
ii22ii2��
n�v�ary
a9
„
nli
v�
•n ..�«.
=
WHO
c�mzzz.-
2pzl„
Ev
_
V`o
_v
2'V
2"v
S$
_
n
_
_
Ej
_
�ilN
•=n
E>
v3#¢oidXX#oow-
_
�e
uTo
Ya"e�oo
oho
e.$R
Won
ea'e
»
n
L
am
mUo
m
44
--" a
yq�
rlmi
a
rl��
cv90
L
WHO
v,I^31
y
I
>a>rrri
itIMP>
mo;�X�¢'
a�c'oc
&m4
nqo
oS9a
v
¢L
2`¢oadoY
€aaiiry
G<e
oxE
_
o
`Ea
{"
HIM Jz
F
m
'a
037
s
-------------------
------------------
\\\\\\\\\\}
I
Jim
\\\\\\\\\RNA
M
i
!�(%\
(
CL
/(L/ \
E F= E
E E E
_
aa3/ ƒ
�
\Ef
CL
f0v
k
D
�kCo
k
E
S�\/\\
\k
!coo
a
)
()) k
k
!
!
!
.2
!
!
!,
ul
\/
�!§\\
039 8
n admmnrvS
a m��S
n�
e
.
g
F
" F
g ygpg
c
u' E
d 8
�E
8
tltltlE
g�Yta LLsSmJNd
S
eF-
.�
F
g 2E�ag
a go,QA
E��9
�ov'�
aC a�HI
E 2s HIM
3�@S
cE9
U U'V'OQ [IQ N=VWE6 �FN
6
UD
�
Z�N
�
N
--------
e�ss^"ssam
"$Maass
ilk,
—93
09,
'Ak
's
$ spa
zma. �.
z sews"so
ddm- -d
:$m -
$
��sssa-a.s.ss
o�^a�~m�?�
w
aos�sms,�s
^� HUH-9
^sib
as
-m-
ma. mam
edam_ ms
m- _
•
- .nry
gm�mw."a��m
&e�m»»s$am
yry
""aam�d
gm
:eammm»
-E!s Nn.m,o
u�i$n amdm6
�mmP�A$m
g`m^mom $e
g�mmmmmmm
_
�
g- mn
E. m_n.mmn«n
Y--a3rvn:e
'asp„8$$„
g:^m =$mN
g�wN
O
O`•n.
0
Sm9N m��
��
:aR~Nd�wS�^�-^
gFen»
%$
�F
voo$mroe
!!qq _a
dA �$mn
&dmw m$
m_m'nyynmu�
y nd m`alm $d
o
Ervmrv�mmm^
wNa$$8
»
ma
�
_
- nn�
�E»a
ppMary
ism$ ssa
�d^„� �s
�mnandm
edamd
gm-s$w�sas
=ss�sv§§""a
:BEM H
19msIwrs
ag
s=^Qa
-
o$m
».»
w
w
w
maedo
mE-S-6
and
=E�a
BdE�„Fg
Eo2°F
EB
yagd Ez9g
a�EQag"
u„�ayE $So
�g.5
y E�5?
$SE pc55
F UI/iJJM1VUIF
1-(J
I/JJ6UUEF
rUNJJODUEF
^U»JJ6UEr
E
040
/
90
-
=m;.
r
§MH
\\}(\\(
}
'
i\
!\
g41
10
City of Le Dmrta
Comparative Rates of Interest
May 31, 2011
City of La Quim
Average I I Treasury BIIIsINote I I Three
August 20M
494%
5.01%
4.97%
48
4.97%
4.95%
Sept 2N06
4.98%
5,01%
kW%
53
6.00%
5.02%
0dND6
5.00%
5.02%
5,01%
67
4.%%
5.10%
Nov 2006
5.04%
5.03%
5.03%
82.
4.94%
5,13%
Dec 20DO
5.08%
5,04%
SW%
80
490%
5,13%
Jan 2007
5.18%
5,12%
5,16%
64
498%
6,16%
Feb 2007
5.19%
5.13%
5.17%
45
495%
5.18%
Mar 2007
521%
503%
5,15%
67
488%
5,21%
Apr 407
5.20%
5.14%
5.15%
42
484%
5.22%
May 20D7
520%
5.05%
5.16%
32
481%
5.25%
June 2007
5.19%
486%
5.10%
85
481%
5,25%
FY OTm8
July 2007
521%
490%
5.12%
129
4.80%
5.26%
August 2007
5.17%
465%
5,08%
109
459%
5,25%
Sept2007
5.16%
4.86%
5,06%
129
400%
5,23%
W 207
5.11%
4.85%'
5,02%
116
395%
5,14%
Nov 2007
503%
4.83%
4,96%
99
3.34%
4.96%
Dec 2007
4.95%
343%
4.45%
123
3.39%
4,80%
Jan 20M
4.58%
3.33%
4.22%
96
2.31 %
4.62%
Feb 2008
4.12%
324%
3.85%
66
207%
4,16%
Mar2009
4,07%
2.83%
3.67%
74
1.50%
3,78%
Apr2008
3,45%
3.27%
341%
82
170%
3.40%
May 2008
3.14%
3,27%
3,17%
63
192%
3,07%
June 20W
3,09%
1.94%
286%
BO
2.14%
2,89%
FY OBI09
July 2008
299%
1.93%
2.77%
62
170%
1.88%
2,29%
2.75%
2.1B%
2,79%
August 2008
3.16%
1.92%
268%
51
169%
1.89%
2.14%
238%
2.08%
2.76%
Sept 2008
2,81%
1,92%
2.64%
37
142%
179%
1.96%
2.00%
2,13%
2.77%
002008
2.66%
2,61%
261%
29
ON%
1.40%
1,72%
150%
2.07%
2.71%
Nov 200E
2.38%
2.36%
2.36%
64
OA5%
0.49%
1.04%
1.25%
145%
2,57%
Dec 2008
160%
0,18%
142%
116
005%
0.25%
0,59%
088%
OW%
2.35%
Jan 2009
1.36%
0.18%
123%
82
0.15%
0,35%
043%
O88%
0.31%
2.D5%
Feb 2009
1.23%
0,18%
1.11%
75
0.30%
0,50%
0.61%
088%
0.48%
1,87%
Mar2009
126%
0.18%
1.13%
69
0,20%
0,42%
070%
088%
0.37%
1.82%
Apr 209
0.94%
0,18%
085%
54
0,31%
0.33%
0.59%
O.N%
026%
161%
May 2009
0.92%
0.18%
0.84%
80
0,18%
0.30%
0.63%
088%
0.23%
1.53%
June 2009
0.85%
0.29%
0,80%
111
0.20%
0.35%
0.55%
1,13%
0,26%
1.38%
FYO9110
Juty2009
0.69%
0.30%
065%
111
0.19%
028%
0.47%
100%
0.28%
104%
August 2009
064%
0.30%
0.61%
92
0,16%
0.26%
0.46%
1.00%
0.24%
0.93%
Sept 2009
0.56%
0,31%
0.53%
112
0,12%
0.19%
0.41%
1.00%
0,19%
075%
Cot 2009
0.52%
0.31%
0.50%
90
0.08%
0.19%
0,38%
1.00%
0,19%
0.65%
Nov2009
0.56%
0.31%
0,53%
152
ON%
0.14%
0,32%
0,75%
0.15%
0,61%
Dec 2009
056%
0,15%
0,51%
239
0.11%
020%
0,16%
1,00%
0.16%
0.57%
Jan 2010
046%
0.15%
0,43%
179
0.08%
044%
0.34%
0,88%t
0.13%
0.56%
1`e1,2010
0.51%
0.16%
0.48%
162
0.13%
OA9%
0,32%
0,88%
0,15%
0,58%
Maf2010
0,50%
0.16%
0.47%
172
OA5%
024%
0.38%
1.00%
0.20%
0,55%
Apr2010
0,52%
0.16%
048%
162
0,15%
024%
0,49%
1.00%
0.23%
0,59%
May 2010
0,52%
0.16%
0.48%
116
0.17%
022%
0.37%
0.75%
0.28%
0.%%
June 2010
0.48%
0.17%
0.41%
134
0.16%
0.22%
'0.32%
063%
0.32%
0.53%
FY 10111
July2010
0,50%
0.15%
047%
119
0.16%
0,20%
0.30%
0.63%
028%
053%
August 2010
049%
0,15%
O46%
- 108
0.15%
0.19%
026%
0.3B%
025%
0.51%
Sapt2010
0.65%
0,15%
0.51%
107
0.16%
0,19%
0.27%
0,38%
0.24%
0.50%
0012010
0.55%
0.15%
051%
88
0.13%
0,17%
023%
0.38%
0.23%
048%
Nov2010
0,53%
0.15%
049%
84
0.18%
0.21%
028%
0.50%
023%
0.45%
Dec2010
0.57%
0,14%
0,52%
265
0.15%
0,19%
0.30%
063%
023%
0.46%
Jan 2011
0.51%
0.14%
0.43%
206
0.16%
0,18%
028%
063%
024%
0.54%
Feb 2011
055%
0.17%
046%
210
0.15%
0.17%
0.31%
063%
023%
051%
Mar2011
0,54%
0.17%
0.45%
218
005%
0,13%
0.26%
0,75%
0.23%
0.50%
Apr2011
0.59%
0,17%
0.48%
192
0,05%
0.10%
0.28%
063%
0.20 %
0.%%
0.42
11
I
i
i
•
4
i
i
i
i
t
1
,
•
I'
i
1
"43
`F:
`&tr 4 lw4�v
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Receive and File Transmittal of Revenue
and Expenditure Reports dated May 31, 2011 and
Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending
June 30, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION: _
CONSENT CALENDAR: 3
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Receive and File Transmittal of the May 31, 2011 Statement of Revenue and
Expenditures for the City of La Quinta and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter
Ending June 30, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
' \ 4—-KA1
John M. Falconer, Finance Director
Approved- for submission by:
/homas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report, May 31, 2011
2. Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending June 30,
2011
044
CITY OF LA QUINTA
REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 0710112010-0513112011
A 1 1 AL;111VIC1Y 1 I
ADJUSTED
FUNDS
BUDGET
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
General
$37.518,37200
$28.804,352.26
76.80%
Library
2,588,848.00
1,095,76L99
42.30%
Gas Tax Revenue
1,104,000.00
775,253.27
70.20%
Federal Assistance
431,087.00
16,320.00
3,80%
JAG Grant
20,52300
18,589.00
00%
Slesf(Cops) Revenue
100,09000
69.45
0 .10%
Indian Gaming
000
0.00
0.00%
Lighting & Landscaping
%5,300.00
932,166.37
96.60
RCTC
0.00
0.00
0.00%
Development Funding
0.00
0.00
0,00%
Crime Violent Task Force
0.00
0,00
(1
AB 939
54,60000
15.914.20
29.10%
Quimby
95,01
25.995.04
27.40%
_
Infrastructure
1,450.00
1.109.83
76.50%
Proposition lB
577.45500
129,099.37
2240%
South Coast Air Quality
57.424.00
46,891
81.70%
CMAQ4STEA
1,007,105,00
21,104,78
2,10%
Transportation
446,30000
320,864.29
7190%
Parks & Recreation
89.200.00
61.559.00
6900%
Civic Corte,
3,117,60000
3069,20676
9840%
Library Development
35,600,00
24,85000
7000%
Community Center
11,600,00
8,38644
72,30%
Street Facility
15.717.00
9,624.08
62.50%
Park Facility
2,200,00
1.540,19
70,00%
Fire Protection Facility
20,800.00
15,184.16
73.00%
Arts In Public Places
33,925,00
51,270.22
151 A0%
Interest Allocation
0.00
153,162.17
0.00%
Capital Improvement
80,257,058.00
14,086,489.29
17.60%
Equipment Replacement
34,376.00
32,464.98
94.40%
Information Technology
6,295.00
5,240.61
83.30%
Park Equipment & Facility
2,600.00
2,034.30
78.20%
SilverRock Golf
3,652.60700
3,466,956.78
9490%
SilverROCk Golf Reserve
63,429,00
827.84
1,30%
La Quinta Public Safety Officer
2,100.00
2,068.17
98.50%
Le Cana Financing Authority
6,603,455 00
6,594,463.26
99.90%
RDA Project Area Na. 1
86,913,412.00
68,866,462.21
79.20 %
RDA Project Area No. 2
41,618,758.00
38,506,518.71
92.10%
La Quinta Housing Authority
2,519,790.00
2,247,892.77
8920%
$270,167,977.00
$159,409,900.79
Total
045
2
CITY OF LA QUINTA
EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS
FUNDS
ADJUSTED
BUDGET
07MI/2010-00/3112011
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
REMAINING
BUDGET
PERCENT
General
530286,02500
28,559,143.93
922131.98
10,704,749.09
727%
Library
1,803,83B.00
1,176,050,35
000
627,787.65
65.2%
Gas Tex
1,490,702.00
1,478,957.68
0.00
11,744.32
99294
Factual Assistance
431,08700
16,320.00
0.00
414,767.00
3.8%
JAG Gram
20,64300
18,589.00
Dw
2,054.00
900%
Sksf(Copsl Revenue
100,090.00
0.00
0.00
100,090.0)
Dm
Indian Gaming
aw
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.0%
Lighting & Landscaping -
965,3D0.DO
884,86200
0.00
80438.00
917%
RCTC
0,00
0.DO
0.00
0.00
0.0%
Development Agreement
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
CV Violets Crime Task Force
0.00
&W
Dw
000
0.0%
AS 939
486,588.00
275.325,61
2,0D0.00
209,26239
56.6%
Quimby
10,245,761.00
1,907,305.39
0.00
8, 338,455,61
18.6%
IMrastmclure
393,074. D0
0.00
0.00
393,07400
0.0%
Proposition 18
577,45500
142.468,50
0.00
434,986,50
24.7%
South Coast Air Quality
308,106.00
271.032,77
0.00
37.073.23
88.016
CMAQ
1007,105.00
126,911,16
0.00
880,193.84
12.6%
Transponation
4,645436.00
1,165,517,26
0Do
3,479,918,74
25.1%
Paris &Recreation
SAW,00
5,492,56
0.00
4,307.44
56.0%
Civic Center
261,858.00
224,468.01
0.Do
37.389.99
85.7%
Library Development
12,700.00
7,56563
000
5,134.37
596%
Community Center
0.00
0 DID
0.00
0,00
0.0%
Street Facility
654,503,00
647,287.79
0.00
7,215,21
98.9%
Park Fealty
2.91700
1,364.19
0.00
1,552,81
46.8%
Fire PreltcBon
6,DD0.00
3,647.03
0.00
2,352.97
60.8%
Arts In Pubic Places
476,200.00
76,34998
0.00
39985D02
16.0%
Interest Allocation
000
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.0%
Capital improvement
80,257,U60.00
14,086,489.29
1,471,200.00
64,699,37071
17.6%
Equipment Replacement
640,383.00
181
8,611.20
4 '%111.69
29.1%
lmormation Technology
535,752D0
325,24462
0.00
210,507.38
60.7%
Perk Maintenance Facility
560,81500
53,142.54
000
507,67246
9.5%
SiNerRock Goff
3,823,601.00
3,M,641.77
0.00
442,959,23
88.4%
SilverRcc, Reserve
D.00
000
0.00
000
0.0%
LO Pubic Safety Officer -
2,000.00
000
000
200000
00%
La Quints Financing Authority
6.600,456.00
8,5%,8%95
0.00
3,60506
99.9%
Le Quints Housing Authority
1, 128,4X.00
587,271.66
0.00
443,973.08
000
RDA Prgea Area No. 1
112,75 ,575.00
68,462.052A5
5,425.25
44,287,097.60
60.7%
RDA Project Area No. 2
54,855570.00
35,703,594.68
000
Y9,15197&32
65A%
0
046
3
CITY OF LA GUINTA
07/01/2010 - 05/31/2011
GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL
ADJUSTED
REMAINING
%
BUDGET
RECEIVED
BUDGET
RECEIVED
TAXES:
Property Tax
2,269,500.00
1.664,785.70
694.714.30
73.680%
No Low Property Tax Distribution
3,983,630.00
3.772,520.95
211,109.05
94.700%
Statutory Tax - LO
208.473.00
0.00
208,473.00
0.000%
Statutory Tax -Riverside Cnty
82,400.00
76,251.25
6,148.75
92.540%
Sales Tax
4,977,750.00
3,868,574.62
1.109.175.38
77.720%
Sales Tax Reimbursement
1.923,188.00
1,088,006.09
835,181.91
56.570%
Document Transfer Tax
384,300.00
361,510.93
32,789.07
91A70%
Transient Occupancy Tax
4,000,000.00
3,815,1g9.60
184,800.40
95.380%
Transient Occupancy Tax- Mitigation Measures
251,000.00
49,445.96
201,554.04
19.700%
Franchise Tax
1,484,600.00
1.200.744.08
283,855.92
80.880%
TOTAL TAXES
19,554,841.00
15,887.039.18
3,667.801.82
81.240%
LICENSE & PERMITS:
Business License
288,40000
259,428.94
28.971.06
89.950%
Animal License
29,700.00
30,587.50
(887,50)
102.990 %
Building Permits
200,000.00
212,860.22
(12.860,22)
106.430%
Plumbing Permits
25,000.00
27,056.25
(2,056.25)
108,230%
Mechanical Permits
19,000,00
26,376.87
(7,376.87)
138.830%
Electrical Permits
28,000.00
29d02.27
(1,402.27)
105.010%
Garage Sale Permits
15,000.00
15,2500D
(250.00)
101 670%
Mlso. Permits
67000.00
48,651.61
18.348.39
72.610%
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
672.100.00
649,613,66
22.486.34
96 650%
FEES:
Sale of Maps is Publications
4,00000
1, 525.03
2 474.97
38.130%
Community Services Fees
351.550,00
343,43685
8,113.15
97,690%
Finance
550 00
315.00
235.00
57,270%
Bldg & Safety Fees
170,000.00
156,292,10
13,707,90
91.940%
Bldg & Safety Lease Revenue
62,000.00
75.609.31
(13.609.31)
121.950%
SMIP Fees
1,000.00
143.43
856.57
14340%
Community Development Fees
50,000,00
55,415.61
(5,415.61)
- 110.830%
Public Works Fees
165,500.00
128,223.50
57,276.50
69.120%
TOTAL FEES
824,600,00
760,960.83
0,639.17
52.280%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Motor Vehicle In -Lieu
3,314,950.00
1.755,133.70
1,559,816.30
52.950%
Motor Vehicle Code Fines
102.900.00
62,931.12
19,966.88
80.590%
Parking Violations
56.700.00
38,274.43
18,425.57
67.500%
Miser Fines
166,500.00
141,645.94
24.854.06
85.070%
Federal Govt Grants
192700.00
51,827.13
140.872.87
26.900%
County of Riverside Grant
_ 37,500,00
0,00
37, 500.00
0.000%
State of California Grant
25,194,00
2.289.53
22,904.47
9.090%
Fire Services Credit- Capital(10150003375010)
4,235,374.00
3.296,314.66
939,059.34
77.830%
Fire Services Credit -Oper (10150003375000)
4,926,398.00.
3,245,455.36
1,680,942.61,
65.680%
CVWD
16.80000
8,400,00
8,401
50,000%
CSA152 Assessment
297,285.00
29,284.63
0.37
100.000%
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
13,372,301.00
8,919.556.50
4,452.744.50
66.(00%
INTEREST
2,746,148.00
2,434,780,31
311,367.69
88.660%
MISCELLANEOUS
Miscellaneous Revenue
21700,00
27,373.36
(5,673.36)
126.140%
AB939
20,000.00
42.017.51
122, 017,51)
210.090%
Insurance Recoveries
8.29100
11,91448
(3.623.48)
143700%
Assmnt Dist Surplus
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Other Mitigation Measures
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.000 %
Litigation settlement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0000%
Advertising Coop
20,000.00
27,899.00
(7,899,00)
139,500%
Cash Over/(Short)
5000
6417
(14.17)
128,340%
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
70,041,00
109,268.52
(39.227.52)
156.010%
TRANSFERIN
278,341.00
43,133.26
235,20774
15.500%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
37.518.372,00
28,804,352.26
8,714,019.74
76.770%
047
4
CITY OF LA OUINTA
07/01/2010-06/31I2011
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
ADJUSTED
06101/11
REMAINING
BY DEPARTMENT
BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
BUDGET
PERCENTAGE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT:
LEGISLATIVE
665048.00
665.350.13
0.00
99,697.87
5976%
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
45175 00
40,8 A8
0.00
47,106,52
89.57%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1,763, 500.00
1,522,805.38
0.00
240,6W.62
86.35%
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
1,621150.00
128584138
62275
334685.87
79.32%
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
4,501,448.00
3,778,810.37
622.75
722,184.88
79.01%
CITY CLERK
616,15,100
522,255.21
0.W
93,SN,75
79.52%
TOTAL CITY CLERK
616, 154.00
522,255.25
.0.W
9.1598,75
79.52%
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PARKS& RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
1,092,319,W
897,865,45
0.00
194453,55
82.20%
SENIOR CENTER
3 S25,W
314,648.72
2,830.W
67,046.28
WAG%
PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS
318,525.00
169,199.49
2,830.00
148,495.51
53.12%
LIBRARY
1,442,745.W
757,975.81
0.00
584769.19
52,54%
PARK MAINTENANCE
1,174,00700
859,342.08
0.00
304664.92
74.05%
MUSEUM
281,093,00
211864,15
0.00
69228,85
7828%
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES
4,693,214W
3.2 ,895.70
5,660.00
1,466,658.W
68.68%
FINANCE:
FISCAL SERVICES 986,2W,W 854682.86 0.00 133,54734 W,49%
CENTRAL SERVICES 274W0.W 1W,623.37 0.00 - 85,776.63 68,73%
TOTAL FINANCE 1,262,5W,W 11043206.03 0.00 219,323.97 82.63%
BUILDING & SAFETY:
BUILDING&SAFETY -ADMIN
332,=).W
2W,78647
0.00
37,513.53
88.71%
BUILDING
860,W).00
763,347 44
0.00
96,952.55
88.73%
_
CODE COMPLIANCE
945,7W.W
810,450.30
000
135,299.70
85.69%
ANIMAL CONTROL
370,790.DO
305,049.99
000
65.740.01
82.27%
FIRE
4,725,12&W
3,353,272. 83
000
1371653.17
67.70%
EMERGENCY SERVICES
161,550.W
92,575.57
000
68,97443
573
CIVIC CENTER BUILDINGOPERATIONS
115897500
1,034875.02
000
124,099,98
8929%
TOTAL BUILDING& SAFETY
8,554,791. DO
8,854,35].82
0.00
1,9 ,433.W
75.77%
POLICE:
POLICE SERVICES
12,733,306.W
8,021,125.85
0,00
4,712,180. 14
82.99%
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
12,733,W6.W
8,021,125.85
0.00
4,712, 180,14
8299%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -ADMIN
1,414,925.00
1,028,20 Y8
0.00
386, 720,22
72.67%
CURRENT PLANNING
615,50060
4 1,792.77
0.00
180707.23
70.64%
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2,03 .4 5.00
1,462,9W.55
0.00
567,427.45
72,05%
PUBLIC WORKS:
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
638090.00
505.423,38
0.00
132,656.62
81.77%
DEVELOPMENT& TRAFFIC
720,73500
613,39367
000
107,341.33
85.11%
MAINT/OPERATIONS- STREETS
2.247,631.00
1,116,90272
0,00
1,130,728.28
49.69%
MAINT/OPERATIONS- LTG/LANDSCAPING
1721,=).00
1,277,970.58
0.00
*13,05942
74.26%
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
138552000
966,962.35
1584 N
002,708.42
76.29%
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
6,713,666.66
4,4WA1270
15,849.25
2,216,504.07
W.15%
TRANSFERS OUT
5.299, 554.00
4,58JWS2
0.00
716.767.48
198.43%
GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
(7.118 413,00)
(520778367)
000
(1910629.33)
74.64%
NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
39,286,025.00
28,559,14393
22,131.98
10704,749.09
77S1%
ME'
CITY OF LA GUINTA
07/0 V2010 .0513112011
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
ADJUSTED
REMAINING
%
BUDGET
RECEIVED
BUDGET
RECEIVED
LIBRARY:
County of Riverside
2,588.848.00
1.096,079.00
1,492,769.00
42.340%
Contributions
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
0.00
(317.01
317.01
0.000%
TOTAL LIBRARY
2,588,848.00
1,095.761.99
1,493.086,01
42.330%
GAS TAX REVENUE:
Section 2105
228,000.00
169,658,96
58,341.04
74.410%
Section 2106
138,300,00
107.249.91
31,05009
77,550%
Section 2107
303,800.00
225.040.19
78,759.81
74.080%
Section 2107.5
6,000.00
0.00
6,00000
0.000%
Section 2103
427,800,00
273,457.23
154,342.77
63,920%
Traffic Congestion Relief
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
100.00
(153.02)
25302
-153020%
TOTAL GAS TAX
1,104,000,00
775,253.27
328,746.73
70.220%
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE:
CDBG Grant
431,087.00
16.320.00
414,767.00
3.790%
Federal Stimulus
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
431,08700
16,320.00
414.767.00
3.790%
JAG GRANT
Grant Revenue
20,523,00
18,589.00
1,934.00
90.580%
Interest
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL JAG GRANT
20,523.00
18,589.00
1,934.00
90.580%
SLESF(COPS)REVENUE:
SLESF (Cops) Funding
100.000.00
0.00
100,000.00
0,000%
Interest
9000
6945
20.55
77,170%
TOTAL SLESF (COPS)
100,090,00
69,45
100,020.55
0,070%
INDIAN GAMING
Grant revenue
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
0.00
0,00
0.00
0000%
TOTAL INDIAN GAMING
- 000
0,00
0,00.
0000%
LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING REVENUE:
Assessment
966,300,00
932,166.37
33, 13363
96,570%
Developer
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING
965,300.00
932,166.37
33,133,63
96.570%
RCTC
RCTC Funding
1
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Transfer in
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL RCTC
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND
Mitigation Measures
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
0,00
0.00
0.00
0000%
Transfer'm
0.00
0,00
- 0.00
0.000%
TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE
Member Contributions - Carryover
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Grant revenue -JAIB
000
0.00
0.00
0.000%
CLEF Line
0.00
000
000
0.000%
Asset Forfeiture -State Adjudicated
0,00
0.00
000
0,000%
Interest
000
ago
0 00
0,000%
TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE
0.00
000
000
0.000%
AB 939 REVENUE:
AB 939 Fees
000
0.00
0.00
0,000%
Interest
4,600,00
3,41420
1,185.80
74.220%
Transfer in
50,000,00
12,500,00
3750000
25000%
TOTAL AS 939
049
0710112010 - 05/3112011
CITY OF LA QUINTA
ADJUSTED
REMAINING
%
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
BUDGET
RECEIVED
BUDGET
RECEIVED
QUIMBY REVENUE:
Quimby Fees
60.000.00
0.00
60.000.00
0.000%
Donations
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
35,000.00
25,995.04
9,004.96
74.270%
TOTAL QUIMBY
INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE:
Ulilityrefuntl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
1,450.00
1.109.83
340.17
76.540%
Transfer in
000
0.0
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
145000
1,109.83
340.17
76.540%
PROPOSITION 18 - SE1266
Prop 18 Grant
575,785.00
127,851.90
447,933.10
22,200%
Interest
1,670.00
1.247.47
422.53
74.700%
TOTAL PROPOSITION 1 B
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE:
S.C.A.Q. Contribution
48, 900.00
38,402.85
10,497.15
78530%
MSRC Funding
8,224,00
8.224.26
(0.26)
100.000%
Street Sweeping Grant
0.00
0.00
0.00
0000%
Interest
300,00
271.59
28.11
90630%
TOTALSCAO
57424,00
46,899.00
10,525.00
81.670%
CMAQeSTEA
Slate Grants
1, 007, 105,00
21,10478
91.22
2.100%
Interest
0.00
0.00
000
0.000%
Transfer In
0.00
000
000
0000%
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION
1,007,105.00
21,104.78
986.000.22
2.160%
TRANSPORTATION
Developer fees
341,500.00
219,571.53
121,928A7
64.300%
Interest
14,800.00
11.292.76
3,507.24
76.300%
Donations
90.000.00
90,000.00
0.00
100.000%
Transferin
0.00
000
0.00
0,000%
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION
446,300.00
320,864.29
125,435.71
71,890%
PARKS 6 RECREATION
Developer fees
89,200.00
61.559.00
27,641.00
69.010 %
Interest
000
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Transfer in
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.000%
TOTAL PARKS S RECREATION
89,200.00
61,559.00
27,641.00
691
CIVIC CENTER
Developer fees
127,600,00
79,206.76
48,393,24
62.070%
Interest
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,000%
Transfer in
2,990,000,00
2,990,000,00
0.00
100.000%
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER
3,117,600,00
3,069,206.76
48, 39324
98A50%
LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
Developer fees
35,500.00
24.85000
10,65000
70.000%
Interest
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,000%
Transferin
000
0.00
0,00
0.000%
TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
35,50000
24,85000
10.650.00
70.000%
COMMUNITY CENTER
Developer fees
740000
5,180.00
2.220,00
70,000 %
Interest
4,20000
3,206.44
993.56
76.340%
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER
11.600.00
8,386.44
3,213.56
72.300%
�50
CITY OF LA OUINTA
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL
0710112010.0513112011
ADJUSTED REMAINING %
BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET - RECEIVED
STREET FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
Transfer In
TOTAL STREET FACILITY
PARK FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL PARK FACILITY
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY
Developer fees
Interest
TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY
ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE:
Arts in Public Places
Arts in Public Places Credits Applied
Insurance Recoveries
Donations
Interest
TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES
INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND:
Pooled Cash Allocated Interest
Transferin
TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION
12,800.00 8,459.89 4,340.11 66.090%
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000%
2,917,00 1.31l 1,552.61 46 770%
15.717,00 9.824.08 5.892,92 62.510%
2,20000 1.540.00 66000 70.000%
Ono 0.19 (0.19) 0000%
2, 200.00 1,540A9 659.81 70010s,
20.800.00 15,184.16 5.61584 73.000%
OM 0.00 CM 0 000%
20.800.00 15,184.16 5,615,84 73.000%
30,825,00
48,89110
-(18,066,70)
158,610%
0.00
0.00
000
0,000%
0.00
0.00
000
0.000%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
3,100.00
2,378.52
72148
76,730%
33925.00
51.270.22
(17,346,22)
151.130%
0.00 153,162.17 (153,162.17) 0000%
0.00 0,00 0.00 0.000%
0.00 153,162.17 (153,162.17) 0000%
951
1
0710112010 - 0513112011
CITY OF LA OUINTA - ADJUSTED REMAINING %
ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND:
CVAG
1,920,627.00
311.690.11
1.608,936.89
16.230%
CVWD
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
County of Riverside
163,206.00
102,010.60
61,195.40
62.500%
Surface Transportation Funding
9,518,333.00
26,394.12
9,491,938.88
0.280%
City of ndia
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.000%
DSUSD
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.000%
IID
160,160.00
146.679.46
13,280.54
91710%
RCTC
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.000%
Vista Dunes Housing LLP
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
SB821-Bicycle Path Grant
87,300.00
84,472.44
5,827.56
93.320%
State of California
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.000%
APP Contribution
0.00
000
0.00
0,000%
Developer Agreement Funding
578,075.00
46.000.00
532,07500
7.960%
Litigation Settlements
0.00
0.00
000
0,000%
Transfers in From Other Funds
67,829,357.00
13,372,042.56
54,457,31444
19.710%
TOTAL CIP REVENUE
80,257.01
14,086,489.29
66,170, 568,71
291.710%
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND:
Equipment Charges
27,77600
27,776.00
0.00
100.000%
Capital Contribution
0.00
0.00
000
0.000%
Sale of Fixed Asset
000
0.00
000
0,000%
Insurance Recoveries
0.00
0.00
0,00
0 000 %
Interest
6,60000
4,668.98
191102
71.050%
Transfers In
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.000%
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
34,376.00
32,464.98
1,911.02
94.440%
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND:
Charges for services
2.29500
2,295.00
000
100.000%
Capital Contribution
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Sale of Fixed Asset
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
4,000.00
2,945.61
1,05439
73.640%
Transfers In
0.00
0.00
0,00
0000%
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
6,295.00
5,240.61
1,054.39
88250%
PARK EQUIPMENT 8 FACILITY
Charges for services
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000%
Interest
2,600,00
2,034.30
565.70
76.240 %
Capital Contributions
0.00
000
0.00
0.000%
TOTAL PARK EQUIPMENT B FAC
2.600.00
2,034.30
565.70
78240 %
SILVERROCK GOLF
Green fees
3,11145800
2,989,60430
121,653,70
96.090%
Rangefees
117,656.00
95.000.00
22,656,00
80,740%
Resident Card
105,000.00
84,988.00
20012,00
80,940 %
Bob Hope Chrysler Classic
000
0,00
0,00
0.000%
Merchandise
306,49300
297,16448
9, 328.52
96,960%
Food B Beverage
12,000.00
000
12,000,00
0000%
Allocated Interest Income
0.00
0,00
0,00
0000%
Transfers In
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.000 %
TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF
3,652,607,00
3,466,956.78
185,650.22
94,920%
SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE
Interest
1.20000
827.84
372.16
68.990%
Transfers In
62,229.00
0.00
62229.00
0.000%
TOTAL SILVERI GOLF
63,429B0
827.84
62,601.16
1.310%
LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND
Transfer In
2,000.00
2,000,00
0.00
100.000%
Interest
100.00
68.17
31.83
68.170%
TOTAL LO PUBLIC SAFETY
2,100.00
2,068.17
31.83
98 480%
"52
E
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OTHER CITY FUNDS
ADJUSTED
0W31111
REMAINING
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
BUDGET
LIBRARY FUND
INTERESTADVANCE
D.W
O.W
0.00
0.00
CAPITAL PURCHASES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
TW3,838.00
1,176,050,35
0.00
627.787.66
TRANSFER OUT
O.W
O.W
OW
TOTAL LIBRARY FUND
GAS TAX
CONTRACT SERVICES
-
0.00
0,00
000
0,00
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
1.016,184.00
.931,502.W
000
84,682.00
TRANSFER OUT
474 518 00
54] 41111
000
(72 937 68)
- TOTAL GAS TAX FUND
"4g!) 82.00
S93T.
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND:
TRANSFER OUT
431,087.W
16,320.W
414,767.W
TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND
JAG GRANT
TRANSFER OUT
TOTAL JAG GRANT
20,643W
18,589.W
O.W
2,054.W
SLESF(COPS)
TRANSFER OUT
TOTAL SLESF(COPS) FUND
1W,OW.W
O.W
0,00
1WO .W.W
INDIAN GAMING FUND
TRANSFER OUT
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
TOTAL INDIAN GAMING FUND
LIGHTING 3 LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST:
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
965,3W.00
884,W2.W
O.W
8O438.W
TRANSFER OUT
O.W
000
000
000
TOTAL LTGI ANDSCAPING FUND
RCTC
TRANSFER OUT
000
0W
O.W
0.W
TOTAL RCTC
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND
CONSTRUCTION
0,00
0.00
O.W
O.W
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
O.W
0.00
OW
O.W
TRANSFER OUT
O.W
0.00
O.W
0DO
TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT FUND
CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE
OPERATING EXPENSES
0.W
OW
O.W
000
TRANSFER OUT
0,00
ODO
O.W
O.W
TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE
0,00
0,00
000
AS 939
OPERATING EXPENSES
223,10).W
113,26S48
2,WO.W
107,8W.52
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
69,209,00
M."11.00
0,00
5.761.00
TRANSFER OUT
194,279.W
98608.13
O.W
1,670.87
TOTAL AS 939
QUIMBY FUND:
FEASIBILITY STUDY
OW
O.W
0.00
000
REIMBURSE DEVELOPER FEES
0.00
O.W
O.W
0,00
TRANSFER OUT
10.245761.00
1,907,30539
0,00
8,338,455.61
TOTAL QUIMBY
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
CONSTRUCTION
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
393,074 W
O.W
0,00
393,074.00
TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
PROPOSITION iB - SIB 12"
TRANSFER OUT
TOTAL PROPOSITION 1 B FUND
577,455,W
142,468.50
0.00
434.986.50
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
48,9W.W
3107634
000
17,82366
TRANSFER OUT
259206.W
239,956.43
000
19249.5]
TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY
CMAQ
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
0,00
O.W
000
OW
TRANSFER OUT
1W7105.W
126911.16
0.00
880193.514
TOTAL CMAQ
TRANSPORTATION
PROGRAM COSTS
O.W
0 W
0.00
0.00
CONTRIBUTION
0.00
O.W
0.00
0,00
TRANSFER OUT -.
4
1165517.26
0.00
3479,918.]4
TOTAL TRANSPORTATIONG�M
413600
PARKS & RECREATION
INTEREST ON ADVANCE
9,BW.00
5,492.56
000
4,307.44
TRANSFER OUT
000
0 W
0.03
0. W
TOTAL PARKS 6 RECREATION
CIVIC CENTER
SERVICES
0.00
2,042.10
0,00
(2,042.10)
INTEREST ON ADVANCE
60,100.00
37,482.91
0.W
' 22,617.09
REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND
201,75B.W
18494300
0W
16,815.00
TRANSFER OUT
0W
000
O.W
0.W
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER
LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM COSTS
0.W
0,00
O.W
O.W
INTEREST ON ADVANCE
12.700.W
7,565.63
O.W
5.134.37
TRANSFER OUT
O.W
O.W
O.W
O.W n 53
TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT
V
10
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OTHER CITY FUNDS
ADJUSTED
OW31111
REMAINING
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
ENCUMBERED
BUDGET
COMMUNITY CENTER
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
DO)
0.00
000
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER
STREET FACILITY
PROGRAM COSTS
0,00
0.00
DW
0.00
INTEREST ON ADVANCE
13,100.00
SN5.IS
0.00
7,214.82
TRANSFER OUT
841403.00
641.402.61
0.00
039
TOTAL STREET FACILITY
PARK FACILITY
PROGRAM COSTS
0.00
000
0,00
0.D0
TRANSFER OUT
291700
1,364.19
0.00
1,552,81
- TOTAL PARK FACILITY
.1
FIRE PROTECTION
INTEREST ON ADVANCE
6,000.00
3,64703
Dw
2,352.97
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0,00
Dw
0.00
TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF
_
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND
MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP
20,OOD.00
15,020.DO
D.00
4,980.00
OPERATING EXPENSES-APP
4,703.00
834.23
0.00
3,865,77
ART PURCHASES
251,500.00
60,495.75
000
191,I)IM25
TRANSFER OUT
200000.00
DOD
0.00
210,000.021
TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES476,20000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
79,335,439.00
13,955,146.97
1,471,200.00
63,9D9,092.03
PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND
921,621.00
131,342.32
Dw
790278 N
TRANSFER OUT
DW
0.00
Dw
0.00
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT_
,
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
OPERATING EXPENSES
460,099.00
181.430.11
8,811.20
269,85769
DEPRECIATION EXPENSES
175,084.00
0.D0
0.00
175,084,00
CAPITAL PURCHASES
5,200.00
5.200.00
0.00
0.00
TRANSFER OUT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
OPERATING EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION EXPENSES
CAPITAL PURCHASES
PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY
OPERATING EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION EXPENSES
CAPITAL PURCHASES
TRANSFER OUT
SILVERROCK GOLF
OPERATING EXPENSES
TRANSFER OUT
SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE
TRANSFER OUT
LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY
CONTRIBUTIONS
273,654.88 0 w
0,00 0.00
59,000.00 48,587.90 0,00 10,412,10
"1, 39100 0.00 Dw 441.391.00
0.00 000 Dw 000
60,424.00 4!TI21 0.00 55,869.36
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE FAG
3,761,372.00 3,380,641,77 000 380,730.23
62,229.00 0.00 0,00 62,22900
TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF 3,823.601A)ID 0,00
0.00 0.00 0,01) 0.00
TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE
TOTAL LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY 2000.00 0.00 0.00 2,0D0.00
054
11
ATTACHMENT 2
r,.
m
C
u
e
O O O
m
a
;
MM
S O
N
�
y
�
N N c 0 m O aOD fOD arnD O A
rloro oa6n
r
N
n� �
�
!WJ
�n�oorapo�w
yoy
O m
O
OI 0 OI O
N V O O Y f
O V
p
w
Q
N
W
�
N
i
O n N M N O O f O N O
rm
.L
Y I n 0
mOM1AOmAmmmfONN r.0 W
O1010g000(m 0)OOY V V �
(Op
p
--mNOI.V VVV�O�NNNyV
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00000000000
a o
a
0000000000 r0000000���
.�
o00000000oo'oom
izzwz
a
J
F
a V O
UrnZ mLL
C
0-oac €a E v
-
aULLE� cciH
U'U
one € 9F- m
m
22
O W W >• n N n N C N N m
rromWm0ccm3`oao
wCO O O r U p w W o L' c m�
=eO fOZ Z'- W O
�^ LLHFI-�UC7 F-2o 2'1LL O fL Jw
a
3cf0 m.
O L
E $ c
m a E
G y m W
E d
m=Eac
= w m N
yf N m
N C
V m L w
E o d
L m C
W
Z mm.E
Y N m
E
m
o a
« m
a
w c o
o E m' C
0
m E d
U a co
`o m a v
N y b
0 m U
N
v �
Q N J
�55
12
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Approval to Excuse Commissioner Mark
Weber's Absences from the July 12, 2011, Planning
Commission Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION: �{
CONSENT CALENDAR: l
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve a request from Commissioner Mark Weber to be excused from attending
the July 12, 2011, Planning Commission meeting.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The La Quinta Municipal Code, Section 2.06.020(B) includes the statement: "A
board or commission member may request the City Council to excuse an absence
after -the -fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from
seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted
by the City Council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above -stated
limitations on absences."
Staff has discussed this section with all Commissions and, in response,
Commissioner Weber has requested of the City Council to be excused from the
July 12, 2011, Planning Commission meeting. The request was made prior to the
Planning Commission meeting and is included for your consideration (Attachment
1).
056
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve Commissioner Weber's request to be excused from the July 12,
2011, Planning Commission meeting; or
2. Deny Commissioner Weber's request; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully subWitted,
ning
Approved for submission by:
d Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Request from Commissioner Weber
057
Monika Radeva ATTACHMENT # 1
From:
Carolyn Walker
Sent:
Monday, July 11, 2011 9:57 AM
To:
Monika Radeva
Cc:
Les Johnson; David Sawyer
Subject:
FW: Absence from Planning Commission Meeting July 12th
Attachments:
AVG Certification.txt image001.png
From: Mark Weber [mailto:mweber@cveza.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 5:26 PM
To: Carolyn Walker
Subject: Absence from Planning Commission Meeting July 12tfi
Carolyn,
I will be attending the July 26'" Planning Commission Meeting, but could you advise Mr. Johnson that I am
unfortunately scheduled to be out July 12'" and will therefore be unable to attend the Planning Commission
Meeting that evening.
I have a trip to Sacramento and a Solar Economic Development recruitment Conference out of town which will
hopefully lead to additional interest in the Coachella Valley, ultimately resulting in companies moving to our
Coachella Valley and more jobs for our community/citizens.
I was hoping the Mayor and City Council would consider another formal excuse for my absence for this
meeting.
As you are aware, I continue to work our Planning Commission actions and remain involved in the items and
activities outside of the actual meeting and will continue to do so.
Regards,
Mark Weber
Manager
Coachella Valley Enterprise Zone Authority
45-125 Smurr Street, Suite A
Indio, CA 92201
Tele: 760.391.5176
Cell: 760.399.7224
Fax: 760.391.5178
"It's another beautiful day in the Coachella Valley!"
Visit us at www.eveza.org
Save our Enterprise Zones. Visit www.6obsandsafecommunities.com to advise your Legislative
representatives today. They need to hear directly from you!
Find us on
Facebook
0'58
Titf 4 4 4"
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the
Emergency Services Coordinator to attend the California
Emergency Services Association 2011 Annual
Conference in San Diego, California, October 3-6, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: 5
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve the overnight travel for the Emergency Services Coordinator to attend the
California Emergency Services Association (CESA) 2011 Annual Conference in San
Diego, California, October 3-6, 2011. (Attachment 1)
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The City of La Quinta will be reimbursed after -the -fact by the Riverside County
Operational Area Training Grant Program for Homeland Security. The up -front costs
associated with the attendance at the training will be funded from the Travel and
Training fund, account #10-5056-425.51-01 (Attachment 2).
• Registration
$500
• Hotel ($159 per day)
$636
• Meals ($50 per day)
$200
• Transportation city
vehicle
Total
$1,336
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None,
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
This training will improve the skills and abilities of the Emergency Services
Coordinator. Training topics include "Finance Recovery," "Volunteer Management,"
"Crisis and Risk Communications," and "All Hazards Preparedness."
059
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the overnight travel for the Emergency Services Coordinator to attend
the CESA 2011 Annual Conference in San Diego, California, October 3-6, 2011;
or
2. Deny the request for overnight travel; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
G g Butler, Buil i and Safety Director.
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Description of training course
2. Riverside County "Funding Acknowledgement' form
' 60
ATTACHMENT 1
California ftergeney Services AAM1110t€e1v
wal Annual C®nferen m
BaiWngr aP Champlanil reams
Keynote Speakers include
Dr. James Reese
"Emergency Response Stress Management"
Richard Sheirer
"Managing the Everyday Incident: From Minor Crisis
Catastrophic Event
Steve Gilliand
"Enjoy the Ride: A Roadmap to Success
Expert Panel
"Japan: What Happened, Nuclear Power in CA and
Lessons Learned"
Training Opportunities
• Finance Recovery Training
■ EOC Section Training: Planning/lntelh not
■ Crisis and Risk Communications
• . Mgt 312 — Senior Officials Workshop for All
Hazards Preparedness.
Breakout Sessions include
■ Moving Beyond Facebook and Witte#r .
• Complete Guide to Emergency Management,
Abridged ;
• Volunteer Management
• Non -Structural Earthquake Integntya
Mitigation
■ Social Media Lab: Let's Boot Up!
• Emergency Management 101'for ��iness
• Animals in Disaster
• Disaster GIS Mappingand Your.:EO
• Developing Your Elevator Speech
• CESA Award Winning Programs: Tips,from the
Best
■ An Emergency Manager and Survivor
Registration Information
Send registration form and payment payable to:
California Emergency Services Association -
Southern Chapter
P.O. Box 630220, Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 520-5854 (phone)
(805) 585-3227 (fax)
tallegrae-cesa.net or www.cesa.net
Credit card payments are accepted from
American Express, Visa or Mastercard.
Awards Luncheon .
The 2011 CESA Awards luncheon is the.
highlight of every annual conference. We .
will be acknowledging and commending
to California's best programs and people in
emergency management community.
Networking Opportunities
Pre -Conference Temecula Tour,
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Welcome to San Diego Hotel, Mixer
Team, 'CESA Clubhouse
Seventh Inning Stretch
Player's Auction and Team Quest
,�oii�fessrscs��Dd#es !
training Day, Monday, October 3, 2011
Conference, Tuesday, October 4 through
Thursday, October 6, 2011
C$niferQ nc¢ Fees
$85 Rib -Conference Temecula Tour
$75- Conference Training Day
$500 Early Bird CESA member
$6p0 EarlyiOrd non-CESA member
$0 Late Registration CESA member
3650 Late Registration non-CESA member
$50 Additional Awards Banquet Luncheon
ticket
418b ld itio[ at pleas k cet r ntire
Go erenoe ,
Meeting Location and Lodging
All conference sessions and trainings are
held at the Crowne Plaza Hotel. When
making reservations at the. hotel, request the
CESA Conference Room rate of $109 which
includes Wi-Fi and Parking. Taxes are not
Included.
Crowne Plaza Hotel: For Reservations:
1-800-593-5447
Visit the CESA website at:
www.ceso.net for the complete
conference brochure!
r�l
gem
Riverside County Fire Department Office of Emergency Services
Riverside County Operational Area
Homeland Security Grant Training Program FY10 Attachment 2
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
Your city has.,agreed to participate in the Riverside County Operational Area Training Grant Program for'Nomeland
Security Grant Program FY10. Because your city will be required to pay for all training/conference expenses up -front
and be reimbursed by the grant after -the -fact, it is necessary for our office to confirm your cities ability to participate in
this program. Once you have read and agree, please sign and return this document to the Riverside County Fire
Department Office of Emergency Services (DES) via fax at (951) 955-8940 or by PDF via email to:
Kathleen. henderson@fire.ca.gov. All forms must be stoned and received In our office no Later than Monday.
1. Your city acknowledges and agrees they have read and understand the Riverside County Board of Supervisors
Travel Policy D-1 (revised August 2010) and the DES `Travel Do's and Don'ts' document which clearly outlines
travel requirements and reimbursement processes.
2. Your city acknowledges and agrees that it is their obligation to contact DES with any questions or concerns
about these policies prior to making any arrangements for travel
3. Your city understands and agrees to pay for ail conference related expenses in advance and that they will be
reimbursed for eligible expenses once the participant returns from the conference and submits all required
documentation to OES. Expenses for attending such trainings`may include but are not limited to: hotel, flight,
conference registration, car rental and per diem.
4. Your city understands and agrees that prior to reimbursement for any travel or conference expenses, all
documentation must be reviewed and approved by DES to insure compliance with Riverside County Board of
Supervisors Travel Policy D-1 and with all grant requirements. Reimbursement to the city for such expenses
may take several weeks to receive.
5. Your city understands and acknowledges that in order to be eligible to attend the WebEOC Conference your
city must either 1) already have and utilize the WebEOC system, or 2) intend to purchase and use the WebEOC
system within the next three years.
6. Your city understands and acknowledges that the baseline for each city is a maximum of one person per city
per course and DES' baseline is a maximum of two persons per course; however, DES reserves the right to
increase these numbers based on total available funding and/or total number of requests to attend a particular
training
IDENTIFIED COURSE
In addition to acknowledging the items listed above, we would also like your city to acknowledge the courses which
have been identified by your full-time, part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator as courses that they
would like to attend or that they would like to send appropriate staff to. Pending receipt of this signed document at
DES, DES will award -funding to your city to attend these trainings/conferences. By signing this your city accepts
financial responsibility for your full-time, part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator or other identified
staff to attend each course listed, unless your specifically identify that a particular course is not approved. Should
you decide to indicate a particular course as not -approved by your city [for this person to attend], please line
through that course and indicate'DENIEW so that we will know that you are not authorizing travel to that course
and subsequently DES will not approve funding for it.
City of La Qulnta:
# to
Avg. Cost per
Training Class/Conference
Date
Location
Attend
Person
Estimated Costs
CESA
10/1 -1016
San Diego
1
$ 1,600.00
1 $ 1600.00
10/12 -
1
IAEM
10117
Las Vegas
1
S 2,200.00
$ 2.200.00
I acknowledge that I have read and understand the items outlined above and thereby authorize the city full-time,
part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator or other identified staff to attend such trainings/conferences.
Signature of Emergency Ser0da Coordinator 15ate Signature of City Manager or Financial Officer Date
"62
T4pf 4 4 a"
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
BUSINESS SESSION: _
ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the /
Emergency Services Coordinator to Attend the CONSENT CALENDAR: T
International Association of Emergency Managers STUDY SESSION:
Annual Conference & Emergency Management
Exposition in Las Vegas, Nevada, November 1 1-17, PUBLIC HEARING:
2011
d*K+]Ptldd4Pl*lelllIIs] ki M
Approve the overnight travel for the Emergency Services Coordinator to attend the
International Association of Emergency Managers Annual Conference (IAEM) and
Emergency Management Exposition in Las Vegas, Nevada, November 1 1-17, 2011
(Attachment 1).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The City of La Quinta will be reimbursed after -the -fact by the Riverside County
Operational Area Training Grant Program for Homeland Security. The up -front costs
associated with the attendance of the training course will be funded from the Travel
and Training fund, account #10-5056-425.51-01. (Attachment 2).
• Registration
$495
+ Hotel ($159 per day)
$636
• Meals ($50 per day)
$200
• Transportation city
vehicle
Total $1,331
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None
063
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
This annual conference will improve the skills and abilities of the Emergency Services
Coordinator. Training will consist of current trends and topics, and information about
the latest tools and technology in emergency management and homeland security. A
concurrent exposition will showcase the leading technologies, products, and services
in emergency management.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNA
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the overnight travel for the Emergency Services Coordinator to attend
the IAEM 2011 Annual Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada; or
2. Deny the request for overnight travel; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
, Building & Safety Director
Approved for submission by:
'Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Description of training course
2. Riverside County "Funding Acknowledgement" form
HE
ep,E�n
ANtVAL
Joy M� / s i„ NON-PROFR
�l L/ .! • � 1 ATTACHMENT 1
Las Vegas! 1�1E�11�1 Fa la hutch. VA
' - - ••••�••�•r' Permit a(i02
a,Mrpnrr M•nnanrn
NOVEMBER 11-17, 2011
201 Park Washington Court
Falls Church VA 22046
Who Should Attend: w .IAEM.wm
n Emergency Managers'•EME%.org
n Homeland Security Officials - - -
n First Response Coordinators
• Contingency Planners - -
• Private Industry Risk Managers -
. Operations Personnel
n Contract Services Providers
Benefits of Attendance: _ EmergencyServices- Coordim for
City of La Quinta
Education and Training: A forum for current trends and topics, PO BOX 1504
information about the latest tools and technology in emergency Ca Quinta, CA 92247-1504
management and homeland security. _ 114un1l1tlirl Bill III lilt
�(l�«un�u�rr�1F�
Collaboration: A place for stakeholders at all levels of
government, private'sector, public health and (elated professions
to exchange ideas on how to protect lives and property from
disasters.
Networking: More than 2,500 leading emergency managers and
homeland security decision makers.
Products and Services: EMEX 2011 showcases the leading _
"achnologies, products and services in emo4'gency management. -
Y
www.IAEM.coni 1
FOR EMERGENCY MANAGERS
FOR EMERGENCY MANAGERS
Headquarters Hotel
Rio All -Suites Hotel
$95/single or double
Reservation deadline: October 11, 2011 -
For reservations, call 1-888-746-,6965 .
Early Bird Registration Fees:
IAEM Members Full Reg Fee........ WV
IAEM Non Members Full Reg Fee .... $595•
('See website for basic reg fee that does not include.
ticket to Sunday night Welcome Reception or
Wednesday Banquet.)
Registration foes increase by $75,Rlter September 1.
Amanda Ripley
Author, The Unthinkable:
Who Survives When Disaster
Strikes —and Why
Amanda Ripley is the author
of The Unthinkable, the
first mass -market book to
explain how the brain works
in disasters. Ms. Ripleys
work is unusual and compelling. She doesn't
just explain what happens in disasters; she
extensively investigates why people do
what they do, and how we can do better,
combining science with storytelling.
As a longtime contributor at TIME Magazine,
Ms. Ripley has traveled the world studying
disasters, natural and man made. She
chronicled Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
from New Orleans, helping TIMEwin two
National Magazine Awards. She covered 9/11
from Manhattan, the sniper attacks in and
around Washington, DC, and from Paris, the
catastrophic 2003 European heat wave which
killed an estimated 50,000 people. Ms. Ripley
has received awards from the Society of
Professional Journalists, the Newswomen's
Club of New York and the Washington
Monthly, among others, and she is a two-
time Livingston Award finalist.
Emergency
Management �Rc ly�irfa
Institute at IAEM - somsuuto sscu exvo-
www.�mex.ere
FEMA Training offerings - -
are a popular add -on to the IAEM Annual To reserve a booth today,
Conference and a great way to maximize visit www.EMEX.org or calf
continuing education. For announcements 703-538-1795 x 1704
and specific courses, see www.laem.com/
Conference
This is the event that brings together
Professional Development _ homeland security and disaster
Hours preparedness suppliers in the
same building, under the auspices
Professional Development Hours IAEM. of the International Association of
awards "Certificates of Attendance" to Emergency Managers (IAEM):
conference attendees thatreflectconference -
participation hours. These hours may
be applied toward the CEM• and AEM Sponsorship Opportunities
programs. Maximize your conference
participation and on -site product,
Conference Justification Toolkit awareness. Flexible sponsor
For ways to convince your boss that you' options are available. Contact
need to attend IAEM 2011, download an Kristine Wise 703-538-1795 x1704,
official invitation, budget -conscious details- or wise@iaem.com
and more. See www.laem.com/Conference.
EMEX Hours (tentative(
Early Bird November 14:6:00pm-8:00pm, <
discount expires November 15:710am-7:00pm,
September 1, 20111 November 16:7:30am-2i00p�
KEYNOTE SPEAKER -
.i�;. combining practical how-to with real -world
' " "a �,,, comedy —has received standing ovations from
"NOVaudiences as large as 13,000.
si
Jason Ryan Dorsey;
The Gen Y Guys
Crossing the Generational
Divide. Leveraging the
Power of GeneratlonsTM for
Your Strategic Advantage
_ Jason Ryan Dorsey
knows the generation.gap
firsthand. His Boomer, mom
keeps checking on him. His Gen Y sister won't
be his Facebook Friend. His Traditionalist
grandfather calls every Sunday —from a
landline. Most important, his generational
strategies and ready -to -use best practices
have created significant breakthroughs for
companies and individuals around the world.
He has been featured as a generational expert
on 60 Minutes, 20120, The Today Show, The
View, and in Fortune Magazine and The Wall
Street Joumal. His unique speaking style —
Gordon Graham
Ignoring Problems Lying.
In Wait: The Ultimate High
Stakes Gamble
Gordon Graham is a 33 year
veteran of California Law
Enforcement. His education
as a Risk Manager and
experience as a practicing
Attorney, coupled with his extensive
background in law enforcement, have allowed
him to rapidly become recognized as a leading
professional speaker in both private and
public sector organizations with multiple areas
of expertise.
Today, Gordon divides his time between study,.
research, writing, speaking, and consulting
in the discipline of risk management. His
innovative programs, based on the values
and beliefs he learned as a child along with
a passion for continuous improvement, are
the standard for any organization that wants.
to improve existing operations and prevent
things from going wrong.
066
rt IRRE'
b
e•=r.
Riverside: County Fire Department Office of Emergency Services
Riverside County Operational Area
Homeland Security Grant Training Program FY10
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
Attachment 2
Your city has. agreed to participate in the Riverside County Operational Area Training Grant Program for Homeland
Security Grant Program FY10. Because your city will be required to pay for all. training/conference expenses up -front
and be reimbursed by the grant after -the -fact, it is necessary for our office to confirm your cities ability to participate in
this program. Once you have read and agree, please sign and return this document to the Riverside County Fire
Department Office of Emergency Services (OES) via fax at (951) 955-8940 or by PDF via email to:
1. Your city acknowledges and agrees they have read and understand the Riverside County Board of Supervisors
Travel Policy D-1 (revised August 2010) and the DES "Travel Do's and Don'ts" document which clearly outlines
travel requirements and reimbursement processes.
2. Your city acknowledges and agrees that it is their obligation to contact DES with any questions or concerns
about these policies prior to making any arrangements for travel.
3. Your city understands and agrees to pay for all conference related expenses in advance and that they will be
reimbursed for eligible expenses once the participant returns from the conference and submits all required
documentation to DES. Expenses for attending such trainings may include but are not limited to: hotel, flight,
conference registration, car rental and per diem.
4. Your city understands and agrees that prior to reimbursement for any travel or conference expenses,. all
documentation must be reviewed and approved by DES to insure compliance with Riverside County Board of
Supervisors Travel Policy D-1 and with all grant requirements. Reimbursement to the city for such expenses
may take several weeks to receive.
5. Your city understands and acknowledges that in order to be eligible to attend the WebEOC Conference your
city must either 1) already have and utilize the WebEOC system, or 2) intend to purchase and use the WebEOC
system within the next three years.
6. Your city understands and acknowledges that the baaeline for each city is a maximum of one person per city
per course and DES' baseline is a maximum of two persons per course; however, DES reserves the right to
increase these numbers based on total available funding and/or total number of requests to attend a particular
training:
IDENTIFIED COURSES
In addition to acknowledging the items listed above, we would also like your city to acknowledge the courses which
have been identified by your full-time, part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator as courses that they
would like to attend or that they would like to send appropriate staff to. Pending receipt of this signed document at
DES, OES will award. funding to your city to attend these trainings/conferences. By signing this your city accepts
financial responsibility for your full-time, part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator or other identified
staff to attend each course listed, unless your specifically identify that a particular course is not approved. Should
you decide to indicate a particular course as not -approved by your city [for this person to attend], please line
through that course and indicate'DENIED" so that we will know that you are not authorizing travel to that course
and subsequently OES will not approve funding for it.
City of La Qulnta:
# to
Avg. Cost per .
TrainingClass/Conference
Date
Location
Attend
Person
Estimated Costs
CESA
1011 -1016
San Diego
1
$ 1,600.00
1 $ 1,600.00
10/12 -
IAEM
10/17
Las Vegas
1
$ 2,200.00
1 $ 2,200.00
I acknowledge that I have read and understand the items outlined above and thereby authorize the city full-time,
part-time or volunteer Emergency Services Coordinator or other identified staff to attend such trainings/conferences.
Date
Signature o— Emergency Servi es Coordinator Signature of City.Manager or Financi I Officer Date
T"df 4 4 a"
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Authorization for Overnight Travel for the
Community Safety Manger, Senior Code Compliance
Officer, and two Code Compliance Officers to attend
the 2011 California Association of Code Enforcement
Officers Annual Training in Pacific Grove, California,
September 6-9, 2011
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION: _
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve the overnight travel for Community Safety Manger, Senior Code
Compliance Officer, and two Code Compliance Officers to attend the California
Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) Annual Seminar in Pacific
Grove, California, September 6-9, 2011 (Attachment 1).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The cost associated with the training will be funded from the Travel, Training
Meetings account # 101-5004-424.51-01. Attendees will be traveling by city
vehicle to the training. Registration fees will include conference fee, meals, and
lodging.
Community Safety Manager
$225.00
Senior Code Compliance Officer
$550.00
Code Compliance Officer II
$550.00
Code Compliance Officer 1
$550.00
Total
$1,875.00
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None
M
This annual seminar provides training that will improve the skills and abilities of the
Code Compliance Staff, as well as continuing education hours necessary to maintain
their certifications. The course offerings cover numerous topics including "How to
Deal with Difficult People," "Officer Safety - Gangs," "Human Trafficking," "Healthy
Homes," "Hoarding," and "Medical Marijuana Concepts." These specific topics, taught
from the perspective of achieving code compliance, are not currently available at other
seminars or locations.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve the overnight travel for Community Safety Manger, Senior Code
Compliance Officer, and two Code Compliance Officers to attend the California
Association of Code Enforcement Officers Annual Seminar in Pacific Grove,
California, September 6-9, 2011; or
2. Deny the request for overnight travel; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
& Safety Director
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1 . Description of training course
069
Attachment I
WA
i
Join us.
2011 CACE0 Annual Seminar
SEPTEMBER 6-9, 2o11 .e ASILOMAR CONFERENCE GROUNDS.
JOIN CACEO FOR OUR 2011 ANNUAL
SEMINAR in beautiful Pacific Grove, CA at theAsilomar.
Conference Grounds!
The Annual Seminar Committee has worked diligently to build a
top-notch educational program, including Dealing with Difficult
People, Fight, Flight or Comply; and Medical Marijuana sessions,
just to name a few!
We also will host the exhibitor showcase for two and one-half
days beginning Tuesday evening and continuing through
Thursday. A diverse group of vendors will be displaying the latest
Innovations and products for code enforcement professionals.
Ahr
Y ih
WHO SHOULD ATTEND? WHY SHOULOYOO ATTEND? t
• Code Enforcement Officers • It's THE conference for Code Enforcement Officers
• Manager, Supervisor and Senior Officers • Experience two fill days of topnotch educational
• building and Safety Personnel - opportunities -
• Public Safety and Health Department Officials • Choose from nearly 16 dosses to most your
• Legal Services and Adminislrotive Support educational goals .
• Elected Officials and PoGeymakers • See the "latest and greatest" at the exhibitor showcase
• Share networking opportunities with peers
• Them's something for everyonel
I I I I 1 1111111111111111 MISSION STATEMENT III 111 J I I I I I I I I 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111
CACEO represents and supports its members by:
- Providing comprehensive code enforcement education, training and certification
Providing legislative advocacy
Facilitating a network for the exchange of information and support
Promoting the image and professionalism of code enforcement
U7JL
nunnnnnnuEnrun�nn�nnurnnuunuu(iuiun�nnnnunniriruniirinunuuuuununnuuun�
GENERAL INFORMATION AND FREQUENTLY
ASKED QUESTIONS
WHERE ISTf9E SErdWAR?
All activities associated with the 2011
Annual Code Enforcement Seminar and
Exhibitor Showcase take place at:.
Asilomar Conference Grounds
800 Asilomar Blvd.
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
HOW DO I REGISTER?
The deadline to pre•register for
the conference is August 26, 2011.
Registrations "made after August 8, 2011
are subject to hotel availability. You have
the option of filling out the attached
registration form at the back of this
brochure or signing up online of
www.ccceo.us.
WHAT W I REOHITER ArMIATHE
AUGUST 20s 20I I DEADLME?
There will be an additional $20 fee For
onsite registration.
WHAT IS THE CANCELLATION
POLICT?
Cancellations must be submitted IN
WRITING and received by CACEO (via
fax, mail or email) no later than August
26, 2011. All cancellations received on or
before August 26, 2011, will be refunded
less a $25 processing Fee. There will be
NO refunds for cancellations made after
August 26, 2011. -
CAN I REGISTER A OVCST?
ARE THERE SPECIAL GROUP RATES
Guests may join you for all meal
AVAILABLE AT THE ASILOMAR
functions during your stay at
COMMENCE GROUNDS?
Asilomor provided you have properly
- Special this year, CACEO will be making all hotel.
registered them as a guest staying
arrangements For the attendees staying on property .
on property. Please note that
at the Asilomar Conference Grounds. Registration
educational sessions are reserved for
fees include Annual Seminar registration, three
those, who pay full conference fees.
nights' accommodations on the Asilomar property
-I
and all meal functions throughout the duration of the.
WHEN CAN I PICK OP MT
seminar. Please note there will be no discounts on
REOISTRATION
- shortened hotel stays..
MATERMLS?
Registration materials, including
badges, tote bogs and an up-to-date
conference onsite guide, will.be
available onsite at the registration
desk during the following hours:
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
5.00 - 6:00 P.M.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Thursday,,September 8, 2011
7.00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Friday, September 9, 2011
7.30 10:00 a.m.
EXI1DRr OR SHOWCASE
The Exhibitor Showcase takes place over two and
one•half days, allowing all attendees the opportunity
to conduct business with exhibitors. Exhibitors ploy
a major part in our ability to offer you quality
educational programs. Please support our exhibitors
by visiting their booths and surveying their products
and services onsite. Check the CACEO website for
an updated list of exhibitors.
Exhibitor Showcase Hours
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
5:00 - 8:00 P.M.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
7:30 a.m. = 5:00 p.m.
Thursday, September 8, 2011
8:00 a.m. - 5too P.M. - -
Agenda is fentative and subject to change.
AGENDA AT A GLANCE
New This year the courses are designed
to fall under one of three categories:
Module A, Officer Safety, and Module
B. Below you will find a summary of the
courses in each category:
MODULE A
- Blight Busters
- Ways to Fund Programs
- NPDES
- Human Trafficking
- Healthy Homes
- Hoarding
OFFICER SAFETY
- How to Deal with Difficult People
- Officer Safety - Gangs
- Officer Safely & Self Defense
Fight, Flight or Comply
MODULE B . .
• Code Enforcement Volunteers
• From Demoralized to Inspired
- CaIEMA SAP
• First Aid
- Field Supervision
- Medical Marijuana Concepts
Tuesday -September 6
REGISTRATION AND RECEPTION
Rogiskaon Fours and Reception:
5:D0 - B:00 p.m. -
Stop by the CACEO registration desk to pick up your Annual Seminar materials and enjoy light
appetizer fare. This is a great opportunity to beat the Wednesday morning crowd and get a jump
on visiting our exhibitorsl _
ilVednesd.my -September 7
Registration Hours - communication styles and techniques are integral
7:00 a.m. - 3.00 p.m. to diffusing difficulty, and success at resolving
conflict depends on this skill. Attendees will have
.T Broakfast _ with a new refocused awareness of identifying
7:30 - 9:00 a.m. and dealing with difficult people.
Exhibitor Showcase Hours
reuirements
MODULE B ,
-7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. - -
Code Enforcement Volunteers -
This session will describe the benefits of includ-
CACEO Welcome
ing volunteers in your enforcement program.
8:30 - 9:15 a.m.
- Additionally, the instructor will provide an out-
line on implementation of the program, training
and su ervision -
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
9:30 - 11:15 a.m. -
;�,;. Lunch
' '
MODULE A
11:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m. - -
Blight Busters
The City of Rancho Cordova's Blight Busters
program is unique proactive series of
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
neighborhood sweeps coordinated with
1:00.- 2:45 p.m. -
Code Enforcement, Building and Safety Staff,
MODULE A
Animal Services, Police, and Sac Metro Fire
Ways to Fund Programs -
and Probation. The goal of Blight Busters'
Attendees will be presented with informational
is to help residents identify and correct
case studies on the funding of Code Enforce -
problems of blight and nuisance that may
ment programs. The information will include
impact safety, property value, and overall
rental housing inspection programs, cost
comfort as they visit a new neighborhood
recovery programs, administrative citations and
each week. Kerry Simpson and Curt Haven
other sources for funding such as state -funded .
will present information highlighting the City
abandoned vehicle abatement.
of Rancho Cordova's oward-winning Blight
Busters Program. A quesfiooan"nswer
OFFICER SAFETY MODULE
.period will follow the presentation.
Officer Safety and Gangs
OFFICER SAFETY MODULE
How to Deal with Difficult People -
This session identifies traits of difficult people
as well as strategies to interview difficult
people while ensuring that safety and -
security is.preurved at off times. Effective
This course will provide common sense
techniques on how to work with gang members
and other dangerous people. The session will
emphasize the recognition of gang members and
the mentally ill that could pose a threat to officer
safety. Additionally the attendee will be provided
techniques often used to gain compliance.
073
1:00 - 4:45 p.m.
MODULE B
From Demoralized to Inspired'
This class will provide the skills
needed to achieve organizational
goals by developing high-
performance teams, teaching all
professionals, from inspector to
manager, how to create, lead, and
be a part of an effective team, while
focusing on information management
in relation to performance
measurement.
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
3:00 - 4:45 p.m.
MODULE A
NPDES
This course will include an overview
of the Clean Water Act, as well as
the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit
program that controls water pollution
by reguloting point sources that
discharge pollutants into waters of the
United States. Additionally the session
will include the establishment of a
"Point Sources" enforcement program
through the issuance of discharge
permih.
OFFICER SAFETY MODULE
Officer Safety and Self Defense
This session will provide students
with key points of officer safety. The
training will include an instruction to
the escalation of force and the use
of pepper spray and self-defense
techniques. Additionally, he will
provide hands on training in easy to
learn self-defense techniques.
Certification Exam Preparation
For those signed up for the
cerfificotion exam on Friday morning,
this 90minute review will help
prepare you for the examination.
BBQ BY THE BAY
5:30. - 8:30 p.m.
r ;>_
Thursday - September 8
Registration Hours
7.00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
si
Breakfast
7:30 - 9:00 a.m. .
Exhibitor Showcase Hours
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M. "
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
8:00 - 11:45 a.m.
MODULE
Human Trafficking "
This training will discuss the legal definition of hu•
man trafficking and the various types thereof. It
will provide the tools to identify human trafficking
and who should be contacted if o code officer
suspects human trafficking when conducting on
inspection. Examples of cases will be provided
along with a O&A session.
8:00 a.m. - 2:45 p.m.
MODULE B
COIF,MA SAP
Students will receive a CaIEMA Certification as a
trained Disaster Evaluator. Instruction will include
identification of the various types of disasters, the
technical level of the evaluator, the contents of
various -reports, generalprocedures for build-
ing safety evaluation, right of entry, posting
classification systems, posting and 6grricade
procedures, changing the posting classification,
aftershock from seismic events, and damage
characteristic common to wood framed, tilswp
and masonry buildings."
8:00 a.m. - 4:45 P.M.
OFFICER SAFETY MODULE
Fight, Flight or Comply
This is a fost•poced four-hour class, in two distinct
halves. The first half explains the human physi
ological responses to stress, from simply lying to
facing a critcof life•threotening event.
The second half outlines specific FFC indicators.
These indicators are divided into seven caF
egories: body posture, hand movements, eyes,
facial, body function, vocal, and proxemics.
Each indicator is explained and its origin and
association with FFC is explained. There are over
50 indicators explained in all. "
Lunch and Award
Presentations
11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m.
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
1:00 - 2:45 p.m.
MODULE A
Healthy Homes
This lass will cover three (3) elements of
water intrusion and mold removal. Ad-.
ditionally, the removal lead -based paint
and how it causes o home to be unhealthy
to the occupants. Students will learn the
regulations and code language that can
be utilized when issuing, a notice to require
. correction of violations.
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
3:00 - 4:45 p.m.
MODULES
First Aid
Every Code Enforcement officer should
know how and when to administer CPR. At-
tendees will be trained its rescue breathing
techniques, and safety concerns to mini
mize exposure to disease. Upon successful
completion of the.haining and testing, the
attendees will receive a cerfificate. "
co w".d en the following page.
- 174
Agenda is tentative and subject to change.
ff -Wriday -September 9
Registration Hours
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
7:30 - 10:00 a.m. -
8:00 - 9:45 a.m.
MODULE B
rev: Breakfast„
Field Supervision
7.30 - 9:00 a.m.
Students will learn real world experience and methods for
the supervision of employees. The instructor will review the
8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
fundamentals of supervision. The information presented
Certification Examination
will focus on the mood for supervisors to be aware that
$150 Exam Fee, Study Guide to be
their job is to plan, organize, control, supervise, direct and
purdmsedSepara*
motivate employees to achieve objectives.
Certification process is divided into three
- -
skill level modules (Basic, Intermediate
8:00 - 11:45 a.m.
and Advanced). Each skill level module
MODULE A
has a specific examination. The Basic
Hoarding -
exominafion has 200 questions concern-
This session will include defining Compulsive Hoarding,
ing 14 subject areas. The Intermediate
Spectrum of Clutter: clinical hoarding scale, age of orn
examination contains 240 questions con-
set, mental illness and hoarding conditions, etiology of
cerning 16 subject areas. The Advanced
hoarding behavior, proposed diagnostic criteria, animal
examination contains 275 questions in 17
hoarding, cognitive behavior of compulsive hoarding,
subject areas. Each examination is limed
dementia hoarding, enlarcad harm reduction and family
and is designed to test your knowledge
intervention. Additionally instruction will include the
of the subject areas. The examination
benefits of health and safety receiverships, evaluation
process allows open book and open
of different legal options, understanding the use of.o
notes. A study guide titled "California
receivership in solving hoarding cases, appointment of a
Code Enforcement Sourceguide" is avail,
receiver and the range of their authority.
able. through LowTech Publishing (www.
-
LawT"hPublishing.com). All the informoo- -
- Break -
lion needed to pass the exam is con
9:45 - 10:00 a.m. -
tained in the 300 pages of the reference
text. A passing score of 80% is requiredfor
certification.
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
The Certification Examination must be
10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
registered for in advance, If you are
MODULE B .
interested in taking the examination,
Medical Marijuana Concepts -
please contact Elizabeth. Cardwell at the
This session will present the issues and restrictions mn -
CACEO office, ecardweWcaceo.us or
nected with the dispensing of marijuana. Information will
916492.2223, to determine whether
also be provided on hours of operation, land use resiric•
you meet qualification requirements
lions, security requirements, and parkingrelated issues.
t,
SAVE THE DATE!
Ya1RAnnual Cade
Egjorcenserst3erntnar
October $y-Ns 2015
Dls:MW19 Paradise Pier Sotef
AnahishM CA
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE:
July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Approval Of Second Reading And
Adoption Of Ordinance No. 488 Amending Title 11 of
the La Quinta Municipal Code to Add Section
11.44.100, Dog Park Rules and Regulations.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 488 on second reading.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
On July 5, 2011, the City Council moved to take up Ordinance No. 488 on first
reading. The City Council further moved to introduce Ordinance No. 488 on first
reading.
The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 488 carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, Mayor Adolph
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
076
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
t . Adopt Ordinance No. 488 on second reading; or
2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 488 on second reading; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
no, CIVIC, City Clerk
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
077
ORDINANCE NO. 488
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ADD SECTION 11.44.100 — DOG
PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS.
WHEREAS, the City wishes to amend the La Quinta Municipal Code to
regulate rules for all dog parks; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La
Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 11.44.100. Section 1 1.44.100 is hereby added to Title 11, the "PARKS
AND RECREATION AREAS" Chapter of the La Quinta Municipal Code, reads in its
entirety as follows:
Section 11.44.100 Dog Park Rules and Regulations.
A. Dog parks are to be used by dog owners (handlers) and their dogs only. All
other activities are prohibited.
B. Dog owners using the dog park are using it at their own risk.
C. The City is not responsible for injuries to people and dogs or illnesses dogs
may contract.
D. The City reserves the right to eject anyone from the dog park at any time for
any reason.
E. Adults must accompany children 12 years old and younger.
F. Dog Park hours are 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
G. Dogs must never be left unattended.
H. All dogs must have current vaccinations and a current City dog license.
Unruly dogs are not allowed.
J. Female dogs in Estrus (heat) are not allowed.
K. Dogs are only allowed in the area that is designated for their weight class.
078
Ordinance No. 488
Adding Section 11.".100
Dog Park Rules and Regulations
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 2 of 4
L. Dogs in small dog areas are to be 25 lbs. or less.
M. Dog owners must clean up after their dog(s).
N. Owners must stop their dog(s) from digging. Any holes created must be
filled by the owner of the dog(s).
0. No smoking, alcohol, or drug use is permitted.
P. No loitering permitted in the designated dog park.
Q. Unauthorized pieces of equipment, obstacles, or apparatus are not allowed in
the designated dog park (skateboards, scooters, bicycles, etc.).
R. No dog food (e.g., dog treats) or human food allowed in the dog park.
S. Glass containers are not allowed in the dog park.
T. Special events or contests are not allowed in the dog park without first
obtaining written authorization from the City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19`h day of July, 2011, by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
019
Ordinance No. 488
Adding Section 11.44.100
Dog Park Rules and Regulations
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 3 of 4
ATTEST:
VERONICA MONTECINO, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
/_1» :ie19 4 e7eF3 1107 3e] 0 i1I A
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
080
Ordinance No. 488
Adding Section 11.".100
Dog Park Rules and Regulations
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 4 of 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ►
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1 ss.
CITY OF LA QUINTA ►
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No.
488 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 5th day of July, 2011, and
was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 19' day of July 2011, not being less
than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof.
I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the
City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-1 15.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on
pursuant to Council Resolution.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
n81
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 1 9, 201 1
ITEM TITLE: Approval Of Second Reading And Adoption Of
Ordinance No. 489 Amending Title 9 of the La Quinta
Municipal Code to (1) Clarify the Location of Certain
Landscaped Parkways §9.50.100, (2) Correct an Error
Regarding Guest Houses and Secondary Units 99.140.070,
(3) Adjust the Time Extension Period for Development
Review Permits §9.200.080, (4) Delete Obsolete Language
Referencing Guesthouse Examples §9.210.020, and (5)
Revise Definitions of Child Day Care Uses to be Consistent
with State Law §9.280.030.
i
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 489 on second reading.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: -1
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
On July 5, 2011, the City Council moved to take up Ordinance No. 489 on first
reading. The City Council further moved to introduce Ordinance No. 489 on first
reading.
The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 489 carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, Mayor Adolph
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
082
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 489 on second reading; or
2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 489 on second reading; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
submitted,
J. Wntecino, CIVIC, City Clerk
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 489
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE, 1) A CLARIFICATION REGARDING
THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN LANDSCAPED PARKWAYS
(§9.50.100), 2) CORRECTING AN ERROR REGARDING
GUEST HOUSES AND SECONDARY UNITS
(§9.140.070), 3) ADJUSTING THE TIME EXTENSION
PERIOD FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMITS
(§9.200.080), 4) DELETION OF OBSOLETE LANGUAGE
REFERENCING GUESTHOUSE EXAMPLES (§9.210.020),
AND 5) REVISED DEFINITIONS OF CHILD DAY CARE
USES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW
09.280.030).
9.280.030).
WHEREAS, the City has found that changes in policies, procedures, and
issues with permitting have arisen as staff implements the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City has, from time to time, made amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance to address changes in circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did
on the 141" of June, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to 1) clarify the location of certain landscaped
parkways (§9.50.100), 2) correct an error regarding guesthouses and secondary
dwelling units (§9.140.070), 3) adjust the time extension period for development
review permits 09.200.080►, 4) delete obsolete language regarding guesthouse
examples (§9.210.020), and 5) revise definitions to be consistent with state law
09.280.0301, and recommended approval of the proposed Amendments to the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the 5t' day
of June, 2011, and considered the evidence, written and oral, presented at the
hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of La
Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Title 9, the Zoning Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code, is
amended as identified on Exhibits "A" through "E," on file in the Planning
Department.
084
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 2 of 9
SECTION 2. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. The City Council hereby
finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. The Zoning
Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the General Plan insofar as it amends the
Zoning Code to be consistent with California requirements for second units;
implements existing City policies that are in conformance with those in the General
Plan; removes inconsistent, conflicting, and incompatible portions of text; and
allows for continued high quality development in the City.
SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Planning Director has determined said Zoning
Ordinance Amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to
Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended
(Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Planning Department has reviewed the
Amendment under the provisions of CEQA, and has determined that the
Amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(13)(3), Review for Exemptions of
the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be severable,
and if any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this
Ordinance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment
shall have been rendered.
SECTION 5. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be
construed as necessary to effectively carry out its purposes, which are hereby
found and declared to be in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect and
be in force 30 days after passage.
SECTION 7. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this
Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by
resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this
Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof
of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta.
Ordinance No. 499
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 3 of 9
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19" day of July, 2011, by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
Veronica Montecino, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta California
086
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 4 of 9
Exhibit "A"
9.50.100 RL district property subdivision development standards, ten acres or less,
located south of Avenue 52.
A. Applicability. The following development standards shall apply to all
subdivisions less than ten acres in size located in the RL district, south of Avenue
52, and west of Monroe.
B. Development Standards.
1. A minimum lot size of twenty thousand square feet shall be required,
unless:
a. The proposed subdivision establishes a minimum of twenty -
residential lots). The open space shall include amenities and features
such as passive open space, trails, play areas or equipment, picnic
facilities, recreational amenities, clubhouse facilities and/or active use
parks. Retention basins may be considered as part of the twenty-five
percent open space requirement provided they are designed as an
integral part of the project, fully landscaped, and accessible for
passive and active use.
b. The minimum lot size within the proposed subdivision is equal to
or greater than the minimum lot size of the residential lots within the
abutting subdivided properties created prior to August 2, 2007.
c. Driveway access should be consolidated with other neighboring
properties.
2. Under no circumstances shall lots be less than ten thousand square feet
in size.
3. A landscaped parkway of thirty feet in depth shall be required on all
pub4e arterial streets.
4. All other development standards of the RL district, including but not
limited to setbacks, building height and parking requirements, shall apply.
C. Official Zoning Map. The city's official zoning map shall identify as an overlay
all properties potentially affected by these provisions. (Ord. 440 § 2, 2007)
087
Ordinance No. 499
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 5 of 9
Exhibit "B"
9.140.070 Low density/agricultural-equestrian residential district.
TABLE 9-10
PERMITTED USES IN THE AGRICULTURAL/EQUESTRIAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Accessory Uses and Structures
Guest houses, subject to Section 9.60.010 M
MA
Second units, "granny flats" and employee quarters, subject
o Section 9.60.090 M
MA
DWI
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 6 of 9
Exhibit "C"
9.200.080 Permit expiration and time extensions.
A. Period of Validity. The period of validity for a development review permit shall
begin on the permits effective date as set forth in Section 9.200.060. The period
of validity shall run unless at ^x^'•^s pursuant to subsection C of this
section.
B. Establishment. A development review permit shall be deemed established if the
following actions occur within twenty-four months of the effective date of the
approval or within such other time period designated by the approval:
1. In the case of a development review permit where ministerial permits are
required, such permits have been issued.
2. In the case of a development review permit where no ministerial permits
are required, the use authorized by the permit has been established. In
circumstances where a certificate of occupancy is required, such certificate
has been issued.
C. Expiration. A development review permit shall expire and be of no further force
or effect if:
1. The permit is not established within twenty-four months of the permits
effective date or such other time period designated by the permit approval,
by state law or by this code; or
2. After establishment, the use or activity for which the permit was
approved is discontinued or abandoned for a period of one year.
D. Time Extensions.
1. Upon application before expiration of the period of validity, the original
decision -making authority may grant an extension to the period of validity for
up to one two years if it finds that such an extension is justified by the
circumstances of the project. The filing of an application for extension shall
stay expiration of the permit until action is taken on the time extension by
the decision -making authority unless the application has been deemed
incomplete and inactive pursuant to Section 9.200.070(B).
2. Projects not requiring a time extension may be constructed in
accordance with the requirements and standards in effect at the time of
permit approval provided the construction complies with all project
conditions of approval and all laws in effect at the time of the permit
approval. However, any project or permit requiring a time extension shall
conform to the requirements and standards in effect at the time the
extension is granted. (Ord. 284 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 1996)
089
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 7 of 9
Exhibit "D"
9.210.020 Conditional use permits and minor use permits.
A. Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit or minor use permit is to
provide for individual approval or denial of land uses requiring such permits under
this code. Uses requiring these permits have potential for adverse impacts on
surrounding properties, residents or businesses. Therefore, when such uses are
approved, conditions are placed on their establishment and operation to mitigate or
eliminate such impacts. For purposes of this section, the term "use permit"
includes both conditional use and minor use permits.
B. Definitions. "Use permit" means a discretionary entitlement under the
provisions of this zoning code which authorizes a specific use or development on a
specific property subject to compliance with all terms and conditions imposed on
the entitlement.
1. Conditional Use Permits. Uses requiring a conditional use permit have
moderate to significant potential for adverse impacts on surrounding properties,
residents or businesses; for example, kennels or animal shelters.
2. Minor Use Permits. Uses requiring a minor use permit have low to
moderate potential for adverse impacts on surrounding properties, residents or
businesses. In most cases, such uses are accessory to a main or principal use
on the property;
fesidenee.
rl 90
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 8 of 9
Exhibit "E"
9.280.030 Definition of terms.
"Child day care home" or "family day care home" means, consistent with Section
1596.78 of the State Health and Safety Code:
a; •ar Lure eme.
(a) "Family day care home" means a home that regularly provides care,
protection, and supervision for 14 or fewer children, in the provider's own
home, for periods of less than 24 hours per day, while the parents or
guardians are away, and is either a large family day care home or a small
family day care home.
(b) "Large family day care home" means a home that provides family day
care for 7 to 14 children, inclusive, including children under the age of 10
years who reside at the home.
(c) "Small family day care home" means a home that provides family day
care for eight or fewer children, including children under the age. of 10 years
who reside at the home.
R91
Ordinance No. 489
Amending Title 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 9 of 9
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1 ss.
CITY OF LA QUINTA 1
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No.
489 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 51h day of July 2011, and
was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 19" day of July 2011, not being less
than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof.
I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the
City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-1 15.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on
pursuant to Council Resolution.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
092
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 201 1
ITEM TITLE: Approval Of Second Reading And
Adoption Of Ordinance No. 490 Amending Title 13 of
the La Quinta Municipal Code to Allow a Maximum Cul-
de-Sac Length of 1320 Feet.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 490 on second reading.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: '
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
On July 5, 2011, the City Council moved to take up Ordinance No. 490 on first
reading. The City Council further moved to introduce Ordinance No. 490 on first
reading.
The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 490 carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Sniff, Mayor Adolph
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
��
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt Ordinance No. 490 on second reading; or
2. Do not adopt Ordinance No. 490 on second reading; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
, CIVIC, City Clerk
Approved for submission by:.
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
N94
ORDINANCE NO. 490
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 13 OF THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH OF 1320 FEET
WHEREAS, the City has found that changes in policies, procedures, and
issues with permitting have arisen as staff implements the Subdivision Ordinance;
and
WHEREAS, the City has, from. time to time, made amendments to the
Subdivision Ordinance to address changes in circumstances; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did
on the 14" of June, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a
Subdivision Text Amendment to allow a maximum cul-de-sac length of 1,320 feet
within Section 13.24.070 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and recommended
approval of the proposed Amendment to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the 51" day
of June, 2011, and considered the evidence, written and oral, presented at the
hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of La
Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Title 13, the Subdivision Ordinance of the La Quinta Municipal Code,
is amended as identified on Exhibit "A," on file in the Planning Department.
SECTION 2. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. The City Council hereby
finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan insofar as it
allows for continued high quality development in the City. Because the amendment
conforms to the design and safety policies within the Traffic and Circulation
Element and the Infrastructure and Public Services Element, the Subdivision Text
Amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General
Plan.
SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Planning Director has determined said
Subdivision Text Amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to
Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended
(Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Planning Department has reviewed the
Subdivision Code Amendment under the provisions of CEQA, and has determined
095
Ordinance No. 490
Amending Chapter 13.24.070
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 2 of 5
that the Amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(B)(3), Review for
Exemptions of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be severable,
and if any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this
Ordinance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall
be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph; subdivision,
section, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment
shall have been rendered.
SECTION 5. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be
construed as necessary to effectively carry out its purposes, which are hereby
found and declared to be in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect and
be in force 30 days after passage.
SECTION 7. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this
Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by
resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this
Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof
of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La
Quinta at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 g`h day of July, 2011, by the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES:
ABSENT:
/s11-13IF11I kiF
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta California
096
Ordinance No. 490
Amending Chapter 13.24.070
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 3 of 5
ATTEST:
VERONICA MONTECINO, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(CITY SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
097
Ordinance No. 490
Amending Chapter 13.24.070
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 4 of 5
Exhibit "A"
13.24.070 Street design —Generally.
F. Cul-de-sacs shall not exceed a distance of six ndFed sixty one thousand
three hundred and twenty feet in length (measured from the centerline of the
intersection to the center of the cul-de-sac) unless provided with improved
emergency access/outlet routes no more than one thousand three
hundred and twenty feet from the end of the cul-de-sac.
Ordinance No. 490
Amending Chapter 13.24.070
Adopted: July 19, 2011
Page 5 of 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ►
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ► ss.
CITY OF LA QUINTA 1
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No.
490 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 5th day of July 2011, and
was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of July 2011, not being less
than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof.
I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the
City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-1 15.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on
pursuant to Council Resolution.
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
11 q9
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Authorization of the City Manager to
Approve a Grant of Easement to Imperial Irrigation District
for an Easement for Electrical Facilities along Avenue 52 in
Parcel 18 of Parcel Map No. 33367
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Authorize the City Manager to approve a Grant of Easement to Imperial Irrigation
District (IID) for an Easement for Electrical Facilities along Avenue 52 in Parcel 18 of
Parcel Map No. 33367 subject to minor revisions by the City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
IID will not be charged for the easement.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
IID is constructing Capital Project P-6688 which is an underground distribution line for
a new underground circuit from their Jefferson Street substation west along Avenue
52 in the SilverRock Resort parkway. The approved design showed the new
underground distribution line to be completely constructed within the City's Avenue 52
right-of-way.
While excavating in the area, the IID contractor discovered that he would not be able
to construct the underground vault in its intended. location (per the construction
drawings) due to an unforeseen conflict with an existing underground conduit bank for
another utility. It was not feasible to construct the vault either above or below ground
at or near the intended location while still remaining in the City's right-of-way.
100
Therefore, IID requested the City grant IID an easement for their vault in the SilverRock
Resort parkway adjacent to the Avenue 52.
Since IID's contractor had already made the excavation for the vault and there was no
other feasible location to construct the IID underground vault, the City Manager
approved the placement of the aforementioned vault and indicated IID should prepare
an easement for these facilities. The vault has been constructed above ground along
Avenue 52 as shown in the attached exhibit (Attachment 1).
Attachment 2 is the letter from IID requesting the easement. IID staff is still preparing
the legal description and plat map for the easement. These documents must be
checked by the City staff. Additionally, language may have to be added to the IID
easement "boiler plate" requiring that IID pay the full costs for relocating the vault
should that be required by the City at some time in the future.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Authorize the City Manager to approve a grant of easement to IID for an
easement for electrical facilities along Avenue 52 in Parcel 18 of Parcel Map No.
33367 and direct staff to record the easement with the County Recorder's
Office when the documents are complete and correct; or
2. Do not authorize the City Manager to approve a grant of easement to IID for an
easement for electrical facilities along Avenue 52 in Parcel 18 of Parcel Map No.
33367 and do not direct staff to record the easement with the County
Recorder's Office when the documents are complete and correct; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
10i
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Exhibit Showing Easement Location
2. Letter from IID dated June 20, 2011
102
ATTACHMENT 1
AT PROPOSED h
TO UN4298s EMPTY - TO UN4298S
sr .o.
N168 N163 , N182
11 TO UN8186 .� PMH-11
I fnuonrLl
TO
THRU
"MA
& BCE
WORK
JN4295S & UN8185V
JOrR MUST
UTRMUST
CUT E4 EM
8"CND'S AND
'CUT EX EMPTY
8'CND'S AND
CONDUIT OR
BRING 7O NEW
UN120D605V
BRING TO NEW
=D.PLEASE
UN1200805V
2 (760)1985828.
.
NEW
-to7
CKT168
103
ATTACHMENT 2
._..'_i.I': ,(!<
Real. Estate Section
(760).339.9239
June 20, 2011
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
Attn: Debbie Powell, Economic Development
Project Manager
P. O. Box 1504
78-495 Ca)le Tampico
La Quinta, California 92247-1504
RE: Request for Easement
Dear Ms. Powell:
The Imperial Irrigation District (IID), in its on -going efforts to improve electrical service, is
requesting La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (LQRA) to grant the III) an easement for an
underground vault. The vault will be installed as follows:
The work includes the installation of an underground vault 6 feet wide by 9.5 feet long. This
vault will be located within LQRA and will increase the reliability and quality of electrical
service to LQRA and nearby citizens in the vicinity in the City of La Quinta. The installation of
the new structure will be at ground level. III) will repair all affected landscape and flatwork as a
result of the proposed work.
The IID hereby requests the execution of the enclosed easement by the appropriate members of
LQRA before a Notary Public. Once the easement is executed and notarized, please return it to
the undersigned for further processing.
Thank you for your time and consideration of these important improvements. Please call me at
(760) 339-9239 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Randy Gray, ✓° ~
Right of Way Agent II
RG/pc
Enc.
114
Recording Requested By
Imperial Irrigation District
AndWhen RecordedMail To:
Imperial Irrigation District
Attn: Real Estate Section
P.O. Box 937
Imperial, CA 92251
APN: 776-150-022
Do ..t y Trenerm lax s FA-118Si3:._S$Ik LOW- �i
__Competed an Fog Yalae ut propnv wnmcd, or
,- Compmal on Full V.W. ke nem & enambrance,
remaining rhucon mtime of v!e
Sigrcurtrc rtf LMluam ot.lyene C)Nmn niey Tas - Fum Tame
Spec= Abo c This Line For Recorder's Use
EASEMENT
The Undersigned hereby grants to the Imperial Irrigation District an casement and right-of-way
in, upon, over, under and across the lands hereinafter described, to erect, construct, change the
size of, improve, reconstruct, relocate, repair, maintain and use facilities consisting of:
1. Underground facilities and appurtenances for the transmission and distribution of electricity.
2. Communication facilities and appurtenances.
The above facilities will be installed at such locations and elevations upon, along, over and under
the hereinafter described easement as Grantee may now or hereafter deem convenient or
necessary. Grantee also has the right of ingress and egress; to, from and along this easement in,
upon, over and across the hereinafter described lands. Grantee has the right to require the
easement be kept clear from explosives, buildings, structures, and materials that Grantee
considers incompatible for which this easement is granted.
The property in which this easement and rigbt-of-way is hereby granted is situated in the County
of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 18 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 33369 IN THE CITY OF LQ QUINTA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON
PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN 224, PAGE 24-39 OF PARCEL MAPS ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER.
The easement in the aforesaid property shall be a strip of land, including all the area lying
between the exterior sidelines, which sidelines shall be 5' feet, measured at right angles, on each
jn5
exterior side of each and every facility installed, the approximate location being shown as Detail
"A" on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Grantor shall not erect, place or construct, nor permit to be erected, placed or constructed, any
building or other structure, plant any tree, drill or dig any well, within this easement.
Grantor shall not increase or decrease the ground surface elevations within this easement after
installation of Grantee's facilities, without prior written consent of Grantee, which consent shall
not unreasonably be withheld..
Grantor further grants to Grantee the right to assign any or all of the rights granted in this
easement in whole or in part to other companies providing utility or communication
facilities/services.
Grantee shall have the right but not the duty, to trim or remove trees and brush along or adjacent
to this easement and remove roots for within this easement whenever Grantee deems it
necessary. Said right shall not relieve Grantor of the duty as owner to trim or remove trees and
brush to prevent danger or hazard to property or persons.
CONDUITS CARRY HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS, therefore Grantor
shall not make or allow any excavation or fill to be made within this easement WITHOUT
FIRST NOTIFYING IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT by calling 1-800-DIGALERT
(Underground Alert), and OBTAINING PERMISSION.
This easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of successors, heirs, executors,
administrators, permittees, licensees, agents or assigns of Grantor and Grantee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor executed this instrument this day of
.2011.
LQ QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
By__
Name/Title:
By
Name/Title:
File#
f06
EXHIBIT 'V
A�
r
T,
SE DETAIL,
AVENUE
52
LOMEANDERI'NG S BW
PROPOSED
VAU Yff
1 -1
MINN
PROPOSED VAULT LOCATION ACCORDING TO CITY OF LA QUINTA
PLAN SET NO, 90036 IMPROVEMENT PLANS TRACT NO. 24890
SIDE WALK TO BE REPLACED AS NEEDED
107
State of California
County of
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ss.
On before me,
Notary Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose
name(s) islare subscribed to the within -instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/hedtheir authorized capecity(ies), and that by
his/herhheir signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
Date of Document
Type or Title of Document
Number of Pages in Document
Document in a Foreign language
Type of Satisfactory Evidence:
Personally Known with Paper Identification
_ Paper Identification
Credible Witnesses)
Capacity of Signer:
_ Trustee
_ Power of Attorney
CEO/CFO/COO
President / Vice -President I Secretary / Treasurer
Other:
Other Information:
Thumbprint of Signer
❑ check here If
no thumbprint
a fingerprint
is available.
in8
T4ht 4 4 QK&Z
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011 BUSINESS SESSION:I y
CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Contract Services
Agreement with the La Quinta Arts Foundation STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Contract Services Agreement (Attachment 1) with the La Quinta Arts
Foundation (LQAF) in the amount of $125,000 to be used for the 2012 La Quinta
Arts Festival and various special events planned in the Village, and authorize the
City Manager to execute the Agreement.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
On July 5, 2011, the City Council authorized the appropriation of $125,000 to be
included in the Community Services Department budget (Account No. 101-3001-
451.80-03) for the 2012 La Quinta Arts Festival to be held March 8 through 11,
2012 and the development and promotion of special events to be planned in the
Village.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The City Council approved $125,000 to be used by LQAF to market the 2012 La
Quinta Arts Festival and for the development and promotion of special events to be
held in the Village. This Agreement includes the following events:
Art Under the Umbrellas at Old Town La Quinta, October 29, November
26, December 3, 2011, January 14, February 11, February 18, March
24, and April 7, 2012 in Old Town La Quinta;
La Quinta Blues and Brews at the Civic Center Campus on November 19,
2011.
109
La Quinta Arts Festival on March 8-11, 2012
The Contract Service Agreement with the LQAF indicates that the city will be
the premier sponsor of the La Quinta Arts Festival and will have the city name
and logo prominently displayed on all the print and web materials used. The city
will also have a full page advertisement in the event program. The LQAF also
agrees to maintain a free Artists Registry for city and developer access to
artists.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Approve a Contract Services Agreement with the La Quinta Arts Foundation
in the amount of $125,000 to be used for the 2012 La Quinta Arts Festival
and special events in the Village, and authorize the City Manager to execute
the Agreement; or
2. Do not approve a Contract Services Agreement with the La Quinta Arts
Foundation in the amount of $125,000 to be used for the 2012 La Quinta
Arts Festival and special events to be held in the Village; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Resq
submitted, ^
Edie Hy t n
Community Services Director
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1. 2011 /2012 Contract Services Agreement
N
110
ATTACHMENT 1
CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made and entered
into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation ("City"),
and the La Quinta Arts Foundation ("Contractor").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires to utilize the services of Contractor as an independent
contractor to promote the City by creating and producing the La Quinta Arts Festival and
various special events and activities (collectively, the "LQAF Events").
Contractor represents that it is fully qualified to perform such services by virtue of
its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees.
City desires to retain Contractor, and Contractor desires to serve City to perform
these services subject to the terms contained herein and all applicable local, state and
federal laws and regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the performance by the parties of the mutual
promises, covenants, and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.0 SERVICES'OF CONTRACTOR
1.1. Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this
Agreement, Contractor shall promote the City by creating and providing the LQAF Events
as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by this reference (collectively, the "services"). Contractor warrants that all services
will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with
the standards prevalent in the industry for such services.
1.2. Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in
accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the
City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent
jurisdiction.
1.3. Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified
herein, Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and
approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this
Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that LQAF Event vendors have
proper permits, licenses, and approvals as may be required by all applicable laws and
ordinances. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and
taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from
or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
1.4. Standard of Care. Contractor acknowledges and understands that the
services under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that consistent
with this understanding. Contractor services will be held to a heightened standard of
quality.
111
Last Revised 07/22/10 - Page i of 15
1.5. Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if
any, are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special Requirements") which is incorporated herein
by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the
provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the
provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern.
2.0 COMPENSATION
For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor shall be
compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" in a total amount of One Hundred Twenty -
Five Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($125,000.00) (the "Contract Sum") to be paid
upon execution of this Agreement.
3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this
Agreement.
3.2. Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement
shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit "C".
Extensions to the time period specified in the Exhibit "C" may be approved in writing by
the Contract Officer.
3.3. Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for
performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended
because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the
fault or negligence of Contractor, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the
public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes,
freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe
weather, if Contractor shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay
notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall
ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services
for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgment such delay is justified,
and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to
this Agreement.
3.4. Term. This Agreement shall commence on August 15, 2011 and terminate
on June 30, 2012. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 7.7 or 7.8 of
this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of
the services, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance.
4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1. Representative of Contractor. The following principals of Contractor are
hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contractor authorized to
act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in
connection therewith:
a. Christi Salamone, Executive Director
b. La Quinta Arts Foundation President
112
Last Revised 07l22110 Page 2 at 15
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation
of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this
Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this
Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to
personally supervise the services hereunder.
The foregoing principals may not be changed by Contractor and no other personnel
may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written
approval of City.
4.2. Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Thomas P. Genovese, City
Manager or such other person as may be designated in writing by the City Manager of
City. It shall be Contractor's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept
informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Contractor shall refer any
decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified
herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract
Officer.
4.3. Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience,
knowledge, capability and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees were a
substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this
Agreement, Contractor shall not subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or
in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In
addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred,
voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Any
attempted or purported assignment or sub -contracting by Contractor without the City's
express written approval shall be null, void and of no effect.
4.4. Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have
any control over the manner, mode or means by which Contractor, its agents or
employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Contractor
shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall
remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as
are consistent with that role. Contractor shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation,
or liability on behalf *of City. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Contractor
agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contractor under this Agreement, and
to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and
interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created
by this Agreement. Contractor shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws
regarding Contractor and Contractor's employees. Contractor further agrees to indemnify
and hold City harmless from any failure of Contractor to comply with applicable workers'
compensation laws.
4.5. City Cooperation. City shall provide Contractor with any plans, publications,
reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be
performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contractor only from or through
action by City.
�13
Last Revised 07i2210 Page 3 of I
5.0 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION.
5.1. Insurance. Prior to rendering any services under this Agreement and
throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall procure and
maintain, at its sole cost, insurance as described herein. All insurance coverage required
by this Agreement shall be placed with insurers authorized to do business in the State of
California with an A.M. Best and Company rating level of A- or better, Class VI or better,
unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk Manager in writing.
5.1.1. Minimum Coverage. Insurance shall include the following coverage:
a. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage "occurrence" form CG 00 01 or its equivalent with an edition date
prior to 2004 and with minimum limits of $1,OOO,OOO per occurrence and
$2,OOO,OOO in the aggregate.
b. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 or equivalent
covering Automobile Liability, including hired and non -owned automobile
liability with a minimum limit of $1,OOO,OOO per accident. If Contractor
owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non -owned and
hired auto endorsement to Contractor's commercial general liability policy.
C. Contractor shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance
complying with California's worker's compensation laws, including statutory
limits for workers' compensation and an Employer's Liability limit no less
than $1,OOO,OOO per accident or disease.
5.1.2. Required Endorsements. Liability insurance policies required to be
provided by Contractor hereunder shall contain or be endorsed to contain the
following provisions:
a. City, its employees, officials, agents and member agencies
shall be covered as additional insureds. Coverage shall apply to any and all
liability arising out of the Services or related to the Contract. Additional
insured status under the general liability requirement shall be provided on
Insurance Services Office Form CG 20 10 with an edition date prior to 2004,
or its equivalent. Additional insured status for completed operations shall be
provided either in the additional insured form or through another
endorsement such as CG 20 37 with an edition date prior to 2004.
b. General and automobile liability insurance shall apply
separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Coverage will not
be limited to City's vicarious liability.
C. Liability coverage shall be primary and non-contributing with
any insurance maintained by the City.
d. Each policy required hereunder, and the associated evidence of
coverage (including the workers' compensation and employer's liability
policies), shall provide that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior
114
Last Revised 07/22i10
Page 4, of 15
written notice has.been given to City. Such provision shall not include any
limitation of liability of the insurer for failure to provide such notice.
e. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this
Agreement shall prohibit Contractor, or Contractor's employees, or agents,
from waiving the right of recovery prior to a loss. Contractor waives its right
of recovery against City.
5.1.3. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall deposit with City
simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement, certificates of insurance
evidencing the coverage required hereunder and all required endorsements.
5.1.4. No Waiver or Obligation. There shall be no recourse against City for
payment of premiums or other amounts with respect to the insurance required to be
provided by Contractor hereunder. Any failure, actual or alleged, on the part of City
to monitor compliance with these requirements will not be deemed as a waiver of.
any rights on the part of City. City has no additional obligations by virtue of
requiring the insurance set 'forth herein. In the event any policy of insurance
required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is
canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the
insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly
reimbursed by Contractor.
5.1.5. Prompt Notice. Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City
of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the services performed under
this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the
right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they
are likely to involve City.
5.1.6. Subcontractors. Contractor shall include all subcontractors, if any, as
insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements
for each subcontractor approved by City. All coverages for subcontractors, if any,
shall be subject to all of the requirements stated.herein unless otherwise approved
in advance in writing by City's Risk Manager.
5.2. Indemnification.
5.2.1. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor
shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its
officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all
liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings,
regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses, or costs of any kind, whether actual,
alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential
damages, reasonable attorney fees incurred by City, court costs, interest, defense
costs including fees of expert Contractors or expert witnesses incurred in
connection therewith and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever
incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of or in any way
attributable in whole or in part to the performance of service under this Agreement.
All obligations under this provision are to be paid by Contractor as the City incurs
them.
115
Last Revised 07i22 110 rla0e 5 of 15
5.2.2. Exception to Contractor's Obligation to Indemnify. Without affecting
the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement or this section, Contractor
shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City as set forth above for
liability attributable to the sole fault of City, provided such sole fault is determined
by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent
jurisdiction. This exception will apply only in instances where City is shown to have
been solely at fault and not in instances where Contractor is solely or partially at
fault or in instances where City's fault accounts for only a percentage of the liability
involved. In those instances, the obligation of Contractor will be all-inclusive and
City will be indemnified for all liability incurred, even though a percentage of the
liability is attributable to conduct of the City.
5.2.3. Contractor Acknowledgment. Contractor acknowledges that its
obligation pursuant to this section extends to liability attributable to City, if that
liability is less than the sole fault of City.
5.2.4. Indemnity Provisions for Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain
executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in
this section from each and every subcontractor, sub tier contractor or any other
person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the rendering of
Services under this Agreement. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such
indemnity obligations from others as required here, Contractor agrees to be fully
responsible according to the terms of this section.
5.2.5. No Waiver; Survival. Failure of City to monitor compliance with the
requirements of this Section 5.2 imposes no additional obligations on City and will
in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. Contractor's obligation to
indemnify and defend City as a set forth herein is binding on the successors,
assigns,.or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement
or this section.
5.3. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contractor
fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and
within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option:
a. Obtain such insurance; or
b. Order Contractor to stop rendering Services under this Agreement
until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; or
C. Terminate this Agreement.
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other
remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for
Contractor's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing
herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contractor
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from
Contractor's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement.
116
Last Revised 07;22190 Page 6 �f 15
6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS
6.1. Reports. Contractor shall, upon the receipt of a written request from the
City to so do, periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports
concerning Contractor's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the
Contract Officer shall require.
6.2. Records. Contractor shall keep such books and records as shall be
necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract
Officer to evaluate such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract
Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times,
including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such
records.
6.3 Ownership of LOAF Events. The parties agree that: (a) this Agreement is a
contract for the performance of certain promotion services by Contractor to City; (b) the
LOAF Events are owned by LOAF and not the City: and (c) City shall have no ownership of
the LQAF Events.
7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT.
7.1. California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as
to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in
relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of
Riverside, State of. California, or any other appropriate court, in such county, and
Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the
event of such action.
7.2. Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the
injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a
claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so
long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service
of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after
service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer;
provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general
welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with
the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this
Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of
any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured.
7.3. Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non
defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a
waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contractor requiring City's consent or
approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval
of any subsequent act of Contractor. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in
writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other
provision of this Agreement.
7.4. Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and
remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of 117
Mast Rev,sed 01 22 10 Psge 7 Of I b
the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or
remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other
rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
7.5. Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may
take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover
damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain
injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this
Agreement.
7.6. Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. This section shall govern any
termination of this Agreement. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contractor. Upon
receipt of any notice of termination, Contractor shall immediately cease all services
hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer.
Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the
notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in
accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the
Contract Officer.
7.7. Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party
arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party.
8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION.
8.1. Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City
shall be personally liable to Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event or any
default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contractor or to its
successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
8.2. Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee
participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal
interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is,
directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contractor
warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or
general consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3. Covenant Against Discrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for
itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that
there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons
on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry or
disability in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to
insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment
without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin,
ancestry or disability.
9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1. Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication
either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in 118
Last Revised 07i22110 Page 8 of 15
writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set
forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the
change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours
from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.
To City:
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Attn: Thomas P. Genovese
78-495 Calle Tampico
P.O. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92247-1504
To Contractor:
LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION
Attn: Christi Salamone
78150 Calle Tampico, Suite 215
La Quinta, CA 92253
9.2. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the
parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and
superseded by this Agreement.
9.3. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement.
9.4. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual
consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties.
9.5. Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences,
clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or
unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences,
clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable
and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder.
9.6. Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties
hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to
the provisions of this Agreement.
119
Last Revised 07/22,10 Pag.. 9 of 'i5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates
stated below.
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CONTRACTOR:
a California municipal corporation
0
THOMAS P. GENOVESE,,City Manager
Dated:
ATTEST:
VERONICA J. MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
La Quinta, California
190
Last Revised 07122i10 Page 10 Gi I
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Promote the City by providing the following LOAF Events for Fiscal Year 2011-2012
Season:
La Quinta Arts Festival (the "Festival"): A four -day outdoor fine arts festival to be to be
held March 8 through 11, 2012 at the La Quinta Civic Center Campus.
Marketing services for the above include an extensive marketing plan provided to the City
wherein the name "City of La Quinta" and the official City logo will be prominently
displayed as a Premier Sponsor at all times. Said coverage may include, but is not limited
to: newspapers, magazines, radio and television advertising, as well as billboards, fine art
posters (excluding Festival Commemorative Poster for retail sale), and high quality program
commemorating the event and the City of La Quinta as a Premier Sponsor.
Contractor shall provide a link to the City of La Quinta's website on Contractor's website.
Contractor will send out email blasts promoting the events and activities and share the
information with the city to send out additional email information.
The City will receive a full page in the Festival's 2012 program. Graphic design may be
provided by LOAF at request of the City.
Banners will be provided by Contractor and placed in various locations throughout the City.
The Planning Department will review the placement of the banners and approve the
locations. The Public Works Department will install and remove the banners in the Village.
If banners are installed at various intersections throughout the City, Old Town, and the
Civic Center Campus it will be the responsibility of Contractor.
Contractor will promote the following additional LQAF Events:
Art Under the Umbrellas at Old Town La Quinta, October 29, November 26, December 3,
2011, January 14, February 11, February 18, March 24, and April 7, 2012.
La Quinta Blues and Brews. Collaborating with La Quinta Community Services
Department, LQAF will provide a one -day community event featuring live music with food
and drink amenities at the Civic Center Campus on November 19, 2011.
Artists Registry. Contractor will provide an Artist Registry available to the City and local
Developers at no charge. Such Registry will provide access to local and regional artists
that voluntarily elect to be listed and provide direct contact information. The City may
access such Registry to solicit proposals for the Art in Public Places Program and may seek
support by Contractor for expertise regarding artist selection.
191
Lest Revised 07/2210 Page t t of 15
The following tickets will be provided to the City Manager's office:
ARTISTS FESTIVAL RECEPTION
Ten Tickets for the City Council and spouses.
Five Tickets for the Community Services Commission.
Five Tickets for Key Staff involved in event development
ART FESTIVAL
Ten Tickets for the City Council and spouses.
Ten Tickets for the Community Services Commission and spouses.
Ten Tickets for staff involved in event development.
Fifty tickets for distribution by the City Manager.
LA QUINTA BLUES AND BREWS
Ten Tickets for the City Council and spouses.
Five Tickets for the Community Services Commission.
Five Tickets for staff involved in event development.
122
Last Revised 07i22f'O Page 12 of 15
Exhibit B
Schedule of Compensation
Payment for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be
compensated in an amount of One Hundred Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars 0125,000.00),
payable upon execution of this Agreement.
193
Last Revised 07r22110 Page 13 of 15
Exhibit C
Schedule of Performance
Contractor shall complete all services within the term of this Agreement.
124
Last Revised 07M.;10 Page 14 of 15
Exhibit D
Special Requirements
None.
125
Last Revised 07i22It0 Page 15 of 75
T-af 4 4 a"
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Mlles Avenue Median Island
Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2010-13
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: (3
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Accept Miles Avenue Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project Number 2010-
13, as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the
Office of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of
$11,613 thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The following is a budget summary:
Project Budget Total $ 152,941
Revised Contract Total ($1 17,175)
Previous & Remaining Anticipated Inspection Costs ($ 11,485)
Design Costs I$ 18,800)
Project Plans & Specification Costs ($ 722)
CVWD Irrigation Meter Costs 1$ 3,251)
Project Budget Amount Remaining After Construction Efforts $ 1,508
Original Construction Contract Amount $ 115,811
Contract Change Order No. 1 $ 1,364
New Contract Total $ 117,175
Amount Paid to Contractor to Date (Includes Pending Invoices) ($104,512)
Total Remaining Fiscal Commitment to Contractor $ 12,663
90 Day Maintenance Period (No Retention Held) I$ 1,050)
Total Retention to be Released ($ 11,613)
Contract Amount Remaining to be Billed by Contractor $ 0
126
Adequate funding is available to pay the contractor's remaining billing ($0) and
retention ($11,613) for project closeout.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
The project was funded with Redevelopment Agency Project Area No. 2 funds.
Therefore, prevailing wages were required on this project.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On December 7, 2010, the City Council adopted a Resolution of the City Council of
the City of La Quinta making certain findings pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds toward the Miles Avenue
Median Landscape Improvements; appropriating funding and approving the inclusion of
the Miles Avenue Median Landscape within the Fiscal Year 2010/201 1 CIP; approving
the PS&E; and authorizing staff to advertise the project for bid.
On December 7, 2010, the Redevelopment Agency adopted a Resolution of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Quinta making certain findings pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33445(a) and authorizing the expenditure of funds
toward the Miles Avenue Median Landscape Improvements.
Since half of the project lies within the City of Indio, the Indio City Council also made a
finding allowing the use of RDA funds during its December 1, 2010 meeting.
On March 1, 2011, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute contract for
$115,811 to Marina Landscape Inc., to construct the Miles Avenue Median Island
Landscape Improvements, Project Number 2010-13.
On April 7, 2011, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a Forty Five (45) working day
contract completion time starting April 11, 2011, and ending on June 13, 2011. The
project was deemed substantially complete on June 6, 2011. As per project
specifications, no liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended.
Contract Change Order No. 1 was issued to allow for the removal of buried asphalt,
the installation of one additional irrigation bubbler at each palm tree, as well as a
contract quantity adjustment between the bid quantities and the actual quantities
installed.
The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in
compliance with the plans and specifications.
127
Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City
Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a
Notice of Completion.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Accept the Miles Avenue Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project
Number 2010-13 as 100% complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of
Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to
release retention in the amount of $11,613, thirty-five (35) days after the
Notice of Completion is recorded; or
2. Do not accept Miles Avenue Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project
Number 2010-13 as 100% complete; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Timothy R. Jon s n, P.E.
Public Works Di for/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Pi G/
Thomas P. Genovese, City .Manager
Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map
198
�?9
Tmr4ra4
COUNCIL/RDAMEETING DATE: .IUIV 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of the Turf Reduction Green
Projects, Project No. 2009-18
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Accept the Turf Reduction Green Projects, Project No. 2009-18, as 100% complete;
authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County
Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $28,344, thirty-five
(35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The following is a budget summary:
Project Budget Total (less Personnel costs) $369,751
Revised Contract Amount ($283,444)
Remaining Anticipated Design Costs ($ 5,000)
Previous & Current Inspection, Testing & Survey Costs ($ 49,025)
Plans, Electrical Repairs & Striping 1$ 4,845)
Project Budget Amount Remaining After Construction Efforts $ 27,437
Original Construction Contract Amount $ 268,557
Contract Change Order No. 1-3 $ 16,855
Contract Quantity Change Order No. 4 $ (1,968)
New Contract Total $ 283,444
Amount Paid to Contractor to Date (5141,387)
Total Remaining Fiscal Commitment to Contractor $ 142,057
Total Retention to be Released 1$ 28,344)
Contract Amount Remaining to be Billed by Contractor $ 113,713
Adequate funding is available to pay the contractor's remaining billing ($1 13,713) and
retention ($28,344) for project closeout.
130
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
The project is funded with AB 939 and RDA Area 1 funds. As such, the project was
bid with prevailing wage requirements.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The project included turf removal and landscape improvements at the following
three areas:
Civic Center Campus and City Hall Landscape
Eliminating approximately 43,000 square feet of non -usable turf;
Reducing the annual usage of potable water by approximately 643,000 gallons;
Eliminating excess water and overspray from the streets and gutters;
Reducing areas requiring winter over -seeding; and
Creating consistency throughout the landscape of the Civic Center Campus.
Police Substation Landscape
Eliminating approximately 6,800 square feet of non -usable turf;
Reducing the annual usage of potable water by approximately 181,000 gallons;
Eliminating excess water and overspray from the streets and gutters;
Reducing areas requiring winter over -seeding; and
Creating a "Demonstration" landscape for residents to consider using for their homes.
Fire Station #70 Landscape
Eliminating approximately 23,900 square feet of non -usable turf;
Reducing the annual usage of potable water by approximately 798,840 gallons;
Eliminating excess water and overspray from the streets and gutters;
Reducing areas requiring winter over -seeding; and
Creating a "park like" area for pedestrians, cyclists, and golf cart users.
On December 4, 2007, the City Council approved a Cooperative Landscape Water
Management Program to develop a partnership with the Coachella Valley Water District
(CVWD). Included in the cooperative program with CVWD is the continuation and
expansion of the City/CVWD Weather Based Irrigation Program and a Cooperative
Landscape Water Management Program which contains five main components:
1. Water management opportunities on City properties;
2. Water management opportunities in single-family homes;
3. Water management opportunities for homeowner association properties;
4. Water management opportunities on golf courses;
5. Public relations opportunities.
131
On March 4, 2008, the City Council adopted a Resolution agreeing to participate in the
Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Energy Conservation and
Resource Sustainability Program. The resolution is part of the energy conservation
action plan adopted by the CVAG executive committee and provides an opportunity for
CVAG jurisdictions to join in the regional conservation goal of reducing valley -wide per
capita energy consumption by 10 percent by the year 2012.
On December 15, 2009, the City Council reviewed the preliminary designs for the turf
reduction landscape plans at the Civic Center Campus, City Hall, the Police Sub -
Station, and Fire Station No. 70. The designs included the removal of 142,500 square
feet of turf from all four sites that would save an estimated 3,764,438 gallons of
potable water each year. The City Council concluded the Study Session by directing
staff to 1) not eliminate as much turf; 2) remove turf from slope areas along Avenida
La Fonda; 3) reduce the cost of the landscape improvements; 4) create a more "park
like" setting for the Fire Station; and 5) investigate using artificial turf as an option for
the landscape areas.
The revised landscape designs included the changes that were directed by City Council
with the exception of artificial turf.
The revised designs for the Turf Reduction Green Projects eliminate 73,700 total
square feet of turf from the four sites. Most of this turf is located along the streets at
each facility. The total estimated water savings for the perimeter turf reduction is
1,622,840 gallons per year.
This project has positive environmental impacts such as the very significant reduction
in water usage and reducing the amount of grass that has to be mowed and annually
reseeded, thereby ensuring a permanent reduction in the waste stream. Another
positive result will be to reduce fertilizer and pesticides needed to maintain the turf this
providing for healthy organic soil. In addition, air quality is improved from using lawn
mowers less time, which will reduce pollution caused from fossil fuel consumption.
On March 16, 2010 City Council reviewed the landscape plans and approved the Turf
Reduction and Landscape Plans for the Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Green Projects.
In July 2010, the landscape plans for the fire station were revised to accommodate the
expansion of the Verizon cell tower located at the corner of Avenue 54 and Madison
Street.
On August 3, 2010 City Council approved the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's
Estimate and authorized staff to advertise for bid the Turf Reduction Green Projects,
Project No. 2009-18.
On December 2, 2010, five (5) sealed bids were received for the construction of this
132
project. Staff recommended the project be awarded to the lowest bidder, Rock
Bottom, Inc., in the amount of $ 268,557.
On December 7, 2010, City Council awarded a contract and authorized the City
Manager to award a contract for $268,557 to Rock Bottom, Inc., to construct the Turf
Reduction Greens Project, Project No. 2009-18.
On January 27, 2011, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a sixty (60) working day
contract completion time starting January 31, 2011, and ending on April 26, 2011.
Contract Change Orders extended the project until May 31, 2011. The project was
deemed substantially complete on May 27, 2011. As per project specifications Section
1500-3.2, no liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended.
These improvements were constructed at the City of La Quinta Police Substation
located near the intersection of Avenida Bermudas and Calle Estado, the La Quinta
Civic Center Campus located between Avenida La Fonda and Calle Tampico, just west
of Washington Street, and the City of La Quinta Fire Station No. 70 located at the
corner of Madison Street and Avenue 54.
Contract Change Order Nos. 1-4 allowed for the modification of the landscape layout,
installation of fencing and gates at the police station, the painting or color coat of
masonry walls, concrete repairs, and the modifications for ADA access to the police
station gate and parking area, as well as quantity adjustments between bid quantities
and actual quantities installed.
The project's construction effort is now deemed to be 100% complete and is in
compliance with the plans and specifications.
Prior to filing the Notice of Completion, staff must receive authorization from the City
Council to approve this project as 100% complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a
Notice of Completion.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Accept the Turf Reduction Greens Project, Project No. 2009-18 as 100%
complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office
of the County Recorder; authorize staff to release retention in the amount of
$28,344, thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion is recorded; or
2. Do not accept the Turf Reduction Greens Project, Project No. 2009-18 as 100%
complete; or
133
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Timothy R. Jo son, .E.
Public Works D ctor/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map
134
TTACHMENT 1
Legend
COME LA QUINTA
INDIO
CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS
AND CITY HALL
POLICE SUBSTATION
FIRE STATION #70
SILVER ROCK
RESORT .
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: .December.7, 2010
OF INDIO
THE HIDEAWAY
GOLF COURSE
PGAWESTC.C. '
A r a i ! (I
ITEM TITLE. Approval to Award a Contract to Construct the Turf Reduction
Greens Project, Project No. 2009-18
APPLICANT: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer
135
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to
Construct the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Slurry Seal
Program, Project No. 2010-15
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: 15
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Award a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc., in the amount of $869,460, to
construct the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. 2010-15,
and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The project is included within the Public Works Department Operational Budget for
Fiscal Year 2010/2011. The line item for this project has an unspent amount
available of $917,711 (Account Number 101-7003-431.34-04) from the original
budget amount of $955,106.
As with the last slurry seal project the current effort includes a base bid area and
two Additive Alternates. A vicinity map is provided at Attachment 1. The basis of
award is the lowest combined price of the Base Bid Area plus Additive Alternates
Number 1 and Number 2. American Asphalt South, Inc. submitted the lowest
responsive bid in the combined amount of $1,109,944.
Staff is recommending the City award a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc.
to construct Base Bid Area 1 and Additive Alternate 1 in the amount of $869,460.
The work associated with Additive Alternate 2 will be reconsidered in next year's
Slurry Seal Program.
As illustrated, adequate funding is available to support Staff's recommendation.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
136
The project is 100% funded by the City's General Fund. As such, the project will
be advertised for bid as a non -prevailing wage improvement and may result in a
cost savings to the City.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In 2003, the City Council directed staff to implement an Annual Pavement
Preservation and Maintenance Program (PMP) maintaining an average PCI rating of
80 or better. The PMP is a citywide survey that provides a current inventory of the
City's streets, along with an analysis of the existing condition and preservation
recommendations. The PMP was last updated in November 2007. • This year's
project will slurry up to 5,141,955 square feet of street surface and restripe the
streets after the slurry seal is applied, if the base bid area and additive Alternates
are awarded in total. In addition the project will refresh the existing striping
citywide on all major, primary and secondary arterials, and collector streets.
On June 7, 2011, the City Council approved the plans, specifications and
engineer's estimate of probable construction costs, and authorized staff to
advertise for bid the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. 2010-
15.
On June 7, 2011, the City received eight (8) sealed bids for the construction of
this project. A detailed bid comparison summary is provided for the City Council's
review as Attachment 2. American Asphalt South, Inc. submitted the lowest
responsive bid in the amount of $1,109,944, which included the base bid area,
plus Additive Alternates 1 and 2. Staff is recommending the City award a contract
to American Asphalt South, Inc. to construct Base Bid Area 1 and Additive
Alternate 1 in the amount of $869,460.
Contingent upon the City Council's approval to award the construction contract on
July 19, 2011, following is the project schedule:
City Council Awards Construction Contract July 19, 2011
Construction (30 working days) July - September 2011
Accept Improvements October 2011
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Award a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc., in the amount of
$869,460, to construct the Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Slurry Seal Program,
Project No. 2010-15, and authorize the City Manager to execute the
contract; or
137
2. Do not award a contract to American Asphalt South, Inc., in the amount of
$869,460, to construct the Fiscal Year 2010/20.11 Slurry Seal Program,
Project No. 2010-15; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Timothy R. Jotaiso , P.E.
Public Works LWector/City Engineer
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Geno--L
vese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map
2. Bid Comparison Summary
138
0
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
Base Bid Area 1 includes the city wide striping of Major Arterials, Primary Arterials,
Secondary Arterials and Collector Streets in the public Right of Way. For a Complete list
of city streets see Appendix C.
1.9
v
e!
8
8
8
S
8$$
8^
8
8 8_
8
t
t(
$$
8
8
8 $p
8 R
8 8
8
8
8
$
8
@Cp
s
8 E
8
8
Y�YYYO
R
7777
F
CF
S
F
R
ZZ
�gg
2
&
g
S$
Rp
8 S
�
L 4 1
I
i
•��L2
L �
L�
�
L L
'Fa
isg
��{
a 2 2
N.
a
9
§
1.1[11e4I#II
•.e
q`
!�
4i
L+6'
#�b
$fie
Y` Li 'a �
� � �! ��:�
^
��;
Li
140
REPORTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Is
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
MINUTES
June 13, 2011
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at
5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Fitzpatrick.
Commissioner Leidner led the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Commissioners Blakeley, Engel, Fitzpatrick, Lawrence, and Leidner
STAFF PRESENT: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director; Steve. Howlett, Golf
& Parks Manager; Angela Guereque, Senior Secretary
PUBLIC COMMENT - None.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Director Hylton asked that the Study Session item be moved to the beginning of
the meeting.
Motion - It was moved by Commissioners Leidner/Blakeley to confirm the agenda
as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
PRESENTATIONS - None.
STUDY SESSION
1. Discussion of the Lighting and Landscape Assessment District, Park
Assessment District, Utility Tax, and User Fees as Possible Strategies for
Cost Recovery of Parks Maintenance
Tim Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer presented a PowerPoint
covering the background, strategies, etc. of Special Taxes, Park Assessment
Districts, User Fees, and the Landscape & Lighting (L&L) District.
Commissioner Leidner asked if a new tax is approved, would that, be in addition to
the current L&L District Assessment currently being paid. Director Jonasson stated
there would be an additional tax assessed for the parks above the L&L District
Assessment.
141
Community Services Commission Minutes June 13, 2011
-2-
Director Jonasson stated that outreach is critical for any of these
assessments/special taxes/fees to pass.
Chairperson Fitzpatrick asked how the City can be sure that the funds will not be
restricted on the expenditure toward Capital Improvement projects. Tom
Genovese, City Manager, stated that the City has programs in place to fund Capital
Improvements projects.
Director Hylton presented the User Fee portion of the PowerPoint and explained
that more than 40% of sports field users are non-residents.
Chairperson Fitzpatrick and Commissioner Leidner stated that User Fees should be
looked into as a way to fund a portion of park maintenance.
City Manager Genovese presented the cost recovery strategies for Utility User,
Sales, and General Taxes.
Director Jonasson stated that this item will be presented to City Council in August
2011.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of May 9, 2011 Minutes
Motion — It was moved by Commissioners Blakeley/Leidner to approve the minutes
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR - None.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of Adding Dog Park Rules and Regulations to the La Quinta
Municipal Code
Steve Howlett, Golf & Parks Manager presented the staff report.
Commissioner Engel asked how the rules would be enforced. Manager Howlett
stated that Code Compliance and Law enforcement can enforce the rules once they
added to the Municipal Code.
Commissioner Engel stated that the rule requiring a City Dog License may
discourage use of the dog parks by tourists/visitors.
Commissioner Engel suggested that "Dog Owner" be changed to possibly "Dog
Handler."
142
Community Services Commission Minutes June 13, 2011
-3-
Commissioner Leidner asked what the description of spectator pertained to.
Manager Howlett stated that this rule is to try to keep the dog parks from
becoming social spaces.
Commissioner Leidner suggested adding a container with dirt and a shovel for the
patrons to use to fill up holes that their dogs dig.
Motion - It was moved by Commissioner Lawrence/Blakeley to recommend the
addition of Dog Park Rules and Regulations to the La Quinta Municipal Code.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. Consideration of Cancelling the August 8, 2011 Community Services
Commission Meeting
Director Hylton presented the staff report.
Motion - It was moved by Commissioner Leidner/Blakeley to elect to cancel the
August 8, 2011 Community Services Commission Meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. Monthly Department Report for April 2011
2. Monthly Department Report for May 2011
COMMISSIONER ITEMS
1. Report from Commissioners Regarding Meetings Attended.
2. Calendar of Monthly Events
PUBLIC HEARING - None.
OPEN DISCUSSION
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioners Leidner/Lawrence to adjourn the Community
Services Commission meeting at 6:50 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
143
Community Services Commission Minutes
4-
June 13, 2011
NEXT MEETING INFORMATION:
A Regular Meeting of the Community Services Commission to be held on July 11,
2011 commencing at 5:30 p.m. in the City of La Quinta Study Session Room, 78-
495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253.
itted by:
Community Services Senior
144
REPORTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEM:
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
A Regular meeting held in the Study Session Room
at the La QuintaCity Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
April 21, 2011
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was called to order at 3:00
p.m. by Chairman Wright.
IV
V
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Maria Puente, Peggy Redmon,
Archie Sharp, Allan Wilbur, and Chairman Robert
Wright
Absent: None
Staff
Present: Planning Director Les Johnson, Planning Manager
David Sawyer, Community Services Director Edie
Hylton, Assistant Planner Yvonne Franco, and
Secretary Monika Radeva
PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
CONSENT CALENDAR:
It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Redmon/Wilbur to approve
the minutes of March 17, 2011, as submitted. Unanimously Approved.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. CLG Grant Update:
145
Historic Preservation Commission
April 21, 2011
Planning Manager David Sawyer said the dead line for the 2011
Certified Local Government Grant (CLG) was today, April 21, 2011.
He said the city submitted two applications: 1) Digitization of the
Historic Resources Survey, and 2) Completion of .the Historic Context
Statement, including the digitization of the survey's context
statement, web page development on the City's existing website, etc.
He explained the terms of the application and that the City was
offering to provide 40% of the cost and the grant would provide 60%,
and that the City's portion would be in staff time.
B. 2011 California Preservation Conference:
Planning Manager Sawyer said the 2011 California Preservation
Conference was scheduled for May 15-18, 2011, in Santa Monica,
CA.
General discussion followed regarding the travel arrangement, the
accommodations, classes, meals, etc.
Planning Director Johnson said the Commission would not be
attending the 2012 California Preservation Conference, as it was not
included in the budget. He explained that there were numerous local
opportunities, such as seminars, classes, and conferences that would
allow the Commissioners to satisfy the CLG requirements and remain
certified. He said staff would inform the Commission Members of
these opportunities and the City would cover the costs associated
with attendance.
General discussion followed regarding the classes and conferences
held locally. Staff said that attending these events would also be a
wonderful way for the Commissioners to establish contacts with other
local organizations within the Coachella Valley, who shared the same
passion towards historic preservation.
Planning Director Johnson said the annual three-day Planning
Association Conference scheduled for October 2012 was to be held in
the City of Rancho Mirage. He noted one of the key topics would be
historic preservation and he asked the Commissioners' participation if
their scheduled allowed for it.
Discussion followed regarding the importance of historic preservation
in land use planning, the architectural historic sites within the City of
La Quinta as well as the archaeological sites.
146
F
Historic Preservation Commission
April 21, 2011
C. Historic Plaques and Tour Brochure Update:
Planning Manager David Sawyer gave an update on the Tour Brochure
and explained .that when it was ready to be released, it would tie in
with the City's thirtieth anniversary next year as well as with the
historic plaques project which was being processed by the Community
Services Department.
Planning Manager Sawyer introduced Ms. Linda Williams, President of
the La Quinta Historical Society, who talked about how the decision
for the historic plaques came about. She explained that each plaque
would consist of two 12"x12" ceramic Spanish tiles, side by side,
surrounded by a wrought iron, angle iron frame with several
decorative scrolls. The first tile would have an 11 "x1 1 " ink rendering
with watercolor of the building and the second tile would contain text
giving historical information and the date it was built. The plaques
would be done by a local artist, Kathy Dunham. Six sites have been
selected to initiate the project:
• La Quinta Historical Society Museum
• SilverRock Resort Clubhouse (formerly Rancho Xochomilco)
• La Quinta Resort Hotel
• El Ranchito Restaurant
• Cove casita (La Quinta Palms Realty)
• The former Desert Club (Fritz Burns Park)
Ms. Williams talked about the approval process, the location of the
plaques, the permissions needed to be obtained as some of them
would be placed on private properties, their visibility and accessibility
to visitors, maintenance, etc.
General discussion followed regarding the sites and their history, the
artist's renderings, where the plaques would be located on each site,
historic casitas in the city that might be eligible for recognition, etc.
Community Services Director Edie Hylton said the historic plaque
project was being funded partially from a contribution made by the La
Quinta Museum and partially by funds provided from the Art in Public
Places fund. She noted that the images of the sites being recognized
were original renderings by a La Quinta artist. She explained that the
images would be digitized onto the tile and protected by UV and
graphite coatings.
3 147
Historic Preservation Commission
April 21, 2011
Commissioner Sharp suggested there be a plaque that referenced the
Indian village that existed within the La Quinta city limits. Ms.
Williams said in order to get the plaques in time for the fall of 2011,
the latest by the beginning of 2012, and have it coincide with the
City's thirtieth anniversary; a decision had to be made to go only with
the six plaques listed above due to time constraints. However, more
plaques could be made in the future.
Chairman Wright asked about the costs associated with the project.
Community Services Director Hylton replied that the cost for all six
plaques including the artist's work was $5,800.
Planning Director Johnson wanted to clarify that the plaques were
educational in recognition of the city's landmarks; however, the.
plaques did not mean that the sites were being formally designated as
historic. He said though no action was required by the Commission,
staff wanted to obtain the Commission's approval and suggestions.
He said the project would be presented to the City Council on May 17,
2011, for review and consideration to obtain the necessary funding
from the Arts in Public Places fund.
The Commission Members unanimously agreed that this was a
wonderful project and a great way to spread the word about the city's
history.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None.
VII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: None.
Vill. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS: None
IX. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wilbur/Sharp to adjourn this Meeting of the Historic
Preservation Commission to the next meeting to be held on May 19, 2011.
This meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission was adjourned on April
21, 2011, at 3:44 p.m. Unanimously Approved.
A3 'tt by
Monik Radev
Secretary
MO,
4
REPORTSANFORMATIONAL ITEM: 210
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURE & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
June 1, 2011 10:00 a.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. This regular meeting of the Architecture and Landscaping Review
Committee was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Planning Manager
David Sawyer who led the Committee in the flag salute.
B. Committee Members Present: Jason Arnold, Kevin McCune, and
David Thorns
Committee Member Absent: None
C. Staff present: Planning Manager David Sawyer, Associate Planner
Jay Wuu, and Secretary Monika Radeva.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of April 6, 2011.
There being no comments or corrections it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Arnold/Thoms to approve the minutes as submitted.
Unanimously Approved.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Site Development Permit 2003-762, Amendment 1, a request
submitted by WSL La Quinta, LLC. for consideration of
Architectural, Site, and Landscaping Plans for La Paloma, a 208-unit
senior living community located at the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Avenue 50.
149
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
June 1, 2011
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in
the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
Department.
Committee Member McCune said he reviewed the plans extensively
and was very pleased with the project and the proposed desert
contemporary architectural style. He said RGA Landscape
Architects, Inc. had done an outstanding job with the plant palette
selection. He suggested the applicant use synthetic turf for the
putting greens to avoid maintenance issues, but he thought that
natural turf should be used for the proposed courtyards.
Committee Member McCune commended the applicant for choosing
to use LED lighting, and he said he found the proposed water
features to be adequate and in line with the City's water
conservation efforts.
Committee Member McCune said he found the proposed project to
be beautiful and was very much in favor of it.
Committee Member Arnold said he was also very pleased with the
proposed plans and was in agreement with staff's recommendations
and Committee Member McCune's comments, as stated above, and
was very much in favor of the project as well.
Committee Member Thorns commended staff for the well -written
staff report on the project, he said the report was very informative.
He also commended the project architect as he found the proposed
desert contemporary architectural style to be well -welcomed in the
City of La Quinta.
Committee Member Thorns asked if there was exterior access to
the proposed courtyards, from the outside of the buildings..
Mr. Greg Irwin, Partner of IPA Irwin Partners Architects, 245
Fischer Avenue, Suite # B-2, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, introduced
himself and said the courtyards were not accessible from the
outside, but the doors were aligned in such a way that one could go
through the building from one side directly to the other.
Committee Member Thoms asked how the turf in the courtyards
would be maintained if there was no exterior access. Mr. Irwin said
2 150
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
June 1, 2011
the floor surface used in the hallways of the buildings allowed for
lawn mowers and other equipment to be pushed through the
building into the courtyard.
Committee Member Thorns suggested the applicant use artificial
turf in the courtyards to avoid maintenance issues and water
overspray on the concrete.
Ron Gregory, President of RGA Landscape Architects, Inc., 74020
Alessandro, Suite E, Palm Desert, CA 92260, introduced himself
and clarified that the applicant was proposing the use of natural turf
only in the main courtyard, as it was much cooler in the summer
and the turf would be more actively used. He noted that artificial
turf would be used in the remaining courtyards. He assured the
Committee that the applicant was aware of the difficulties involved
with maintaining the natural turf and was prepared to deal with it as
best as possible. He noted the turf would be kept minimum 18",
maybe 24" away from the buildings, and very low -arc sprinkler
heads would be utilized, to minimize the overspray of water.
General discussion followed regarding the advantages and
disadvantage of the use of natural vs. synthetic turf.
Committee Member Thoms suggested the applicant reconsider the
proposed locations of the trees for the covered parking areas
located on the east, as some of them might potentially interfere
with the parking spaces. Mr. Gregory said the suggestion would be
taken into account when finalizing the landscaping plans.
Committee Member Thoms asked what material would be used for
the property line wall on the north side of the project. He noted the
proposed wall would create a trapping space between the wall and
the existing residential fences. Mr. Irwin said it would be a block
wall and explained that the existing fences were not consistent in
material and setbacks; therefore, in order to create a nice clean look
for the project, a new wall would have to be built. He explained the
residents could tear down their existing fences and the proposed
wall would become the new consistent property line.
Committee Member Thorns asked if the residents would have to
absorb the demolition costs. Mr. Irwin replied the residents would
have pay to have their existing fences torn down, however, they
3 151
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
June 1, 2011
would not be incurring any of the cost associated with building the
new proposed wall. He said the applicant had scheduled a meeting
with the residents to discuss any issues and/or concerns.
Committee Member Thoms suggested the applicant remove the
proposed water feature for the front courtyard. He encouraged the
use of decorative paving to enhance the concrete image of the
walkways and the courtyard. Mr. Gregory replied it was the
applicant's intention to use decorative pavers, however, the details
and materials had not yet been selected.
Committee Member Thoms suggested the fascia of the carports be
painted in one of the darker and stronger colors selected for the
buildings to make it stand out and to expand the color palette
throughout the entire project.
Committee Member Thoms said when traveling north on
Washington Street, the project is visible from a birds point of view
for part of the way. Therefore, he suggested that any equipment
located on the roof be completely screened. Mr. Irwin replied that
all equipment located on the roof would be completely screened and
that it was the applicant's intent to make the screening an
architectural element to the buildings as well.
Committee
Member
Thoms asked staff to consult
with the traffic
engineer to
find out
if a U-turn could be allowed
on Washington
Street from
Avenue
50 while traveling southbound.
He said there
was a left
turning
lane currently existing, but
no U-turn was
allowed.
There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members Thoms/McCune to adopt Minute Motion 2011-
004, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2003-
762, Amendment 1, with staff's recommendations. Unanimously
approved.
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: None.
VIII. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS:
B. Discussion Regarding Summer Meeting Schedule
159
4
Architecture and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
June 1, 2011
The Architecture and Landscape Review Committee unanimously agreed
to go dark in the month of July 2011.
IX. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee
Members McCune/Thoms to adjourn this meeting of the Architecture and
Landscaping Review Committee to a Special Meeting to be held on June 22,
2011. This meeting was adjourned at 10:38 a.m. on June 1, 2011.
Respect ully bmitted
v
MONIKA R DEVA
Secretary
5 153
REPORTSANFORMATIONAL ITEM: Zl
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
April 26, 2011 7:03 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to
order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Alderson.
PRESENT: Commissioners Barrows, Weber, Wilkinson, and Chairman
Alderson. Commissioner Quill had informed staff he
would be late.
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Les Johnson, Planning Manager
David Sawyer, Associate Planner Jay Wuu, and
Executive Secretary Carolyn Walker.
IL PUBLIC COMMENT:
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
There being no comments, or suggestions, it was moved by Commissioners
Weber/Barrows to approve the minutes of March 8, 2011 as submitted.
Unanimously approved.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Final Landscaping Plan 2010-053; a request by Levitan Development
for consideration of final landscaping plans for the Desert Express Car
Wash located on the east side of Washington Street, approximately
780 feet north of Fred Waring Drive.
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department.
154
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked staff to point out the center access
point from the neighboring property as it did not show on the Power
Point slide. Staff responded the plans given to the Commission were
showed the access and were the correct plans.
Commissioner Wilkinson commented on sustainability and walkability
yet there was no connection shown. He wondered why it was not
included.
Planning Director Johnson said it had been staff's recommendation to
have that access point established, but there was strong objection
from the neighboring property to the south. They were not in support
of that connection.
General discussion followed on the reasons for this connection.
Commissioner Wilkinson commented on the photometric study and the
inconsistency of lighting throughout the project.
Planning Director Johnson. responded it was quite bright in a few
places and suggested the Commission could recommend re-
consideration of the lighting plan by directing staff to go over it with
the applicant and make any necessary corrections.
Commissioner Wilkinson had concerns about the possible monetary
consequences, to the applicant, if the electrical had already been
pulled, and then changes were made. He added it appeared the plan
needed a few more light poles with less intense lights.
Staff said that the site was not yet paved and explained why staff
was bringing this before the Planning Commission at this particular
time.
Commissioner Quill joined the Commission at 7:18 p.m.
Chairman Alderson asked staff, if the project was approved, would it
be possible for staff to convey Commissioner Wilkinson's concerns to
the electrical engineers.
Planning Director Johnson suggested that a condition be added
155
-2-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
directing staff to re -visit this to ensure better distribution of lighting
throughout the site.
Chairman Alderson suggested they set it aside, momentarily, and
possibly come back with a motion later in the meeting.
Commissioner Barrows asked for clarification on the comment that the
480 watt lighting was not desirable.
Planning Director Johnson said in this sized project it was a pretty
powerful individual light fixture and that was why the photometric
showed readings at 20 in certain locations.
Commissioner Barrows asked if there would likely be any concerns,
about the lighting, from the residents in the vicinity.
Planning Director Johnson said no, and explained the photometric plan
showed the light dropping off very quickly, going west, and fixtures
no higher than 20 feet with the throw of the light having a minimal
effect on the adjacent residential community to the west.
Commissioner Weber asked about the north side wall and the
landscaping changes proposed. He commented on the fencing that
was preventing egress to that area, as well as the maintenance
arrangements.,
Staff responded there would be wrought iron gates and decomposed
granite (dg), or other ground cover, to fill in the planter area.
Commissioner Weber commented on the lack of space to do anything
meaningful, but the trees next to it provided some softening.
General discussion followed on the subject of ingress/egress to the
site, the Council's decision, and the applicant's position on the
possibility of a future connection if the opportunity became available.
Planning Director Johnson said the Council did not support making a
connection between this and the Mayer Villa Capri project, and the
condition was removed. Subsequently, this applicant has removed
that connection and designed the project accordingly; since the
adjacent property owner was not under any obligation to require the
connection.
156
-3-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
Chairman Alderson had concerns about a maintenance program being
required for elimination of any debris that collected behind the
wrought iron gates.
Chairman Alderson asked Commissioner Barrows if she had concerns
about the placement of the barrel cactus.
Commissioner Barrows suggested they wait to discuss that with the
landscape architect, as the placement could be part of a strategy to
keep people from walking in that area.
Commissioner Barrows then asked about the intensity of the lighting
and the hours of operation.
Staff suggested the applicant provide those answers.
Commissioner Barrows had concerns about the view heading north on
Washington. She asked how the landscaping would be modified in
terms of whether there were going to be some trees added to soften
the mass of the car wash and the office building behind it.
Planning Director Johnson explained the applicant's plans to achieve
softening of the direct view heading northbound on Washington; as
well as information on the aesthetics of the fabric Canopies.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked what the canopy colors were.
Planning Director Johnson said they were to be beige and
complementary to the building colors.
Commissioner Quill asked if Condition No. 107 (having to do with
ingress/egress to the south) had been removed.
Planning Director Johnson said yes, from the standpoint of the project
to the south. Mayer Villa Capri was not conditioned to provide for
that access.
Discussion followed on:
• What was stated in Condition No. 107
• The effect of the Council's decision
• What the applicant planned
157
M
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
• Possible modification of conditions
• Possible options if neighboring project ownership changed
Commissioner Quill said he was in favor of retaining Condition No.
107 as the access was a very smart thing to do. He commented on
the City Council's decision of not conditioning the connection as a
poor planning choice for connectivity opportunities. He did not
understand why the condition was left in if the client was not required
to do it.
Planning Director Johnson said staff could schedule a hearing for
consideration of removing the condition, if the Commission felt
strongly about it.
Discussion followed on:
• If the condition was not removed, was it required?
• Staff's position for not removing the condition.
• What was currently at the site?
• The Council's comments, and subsequent decision, on the
connection.
Commissioner Barrows said her understanding of retaining that
condition was that as long as it didn't create a problem for the
applicant and, if things changed with the design, it would not create a
huge impact to the applicant, then there's not a huge impact to the
applicant if it turns out that that access point could be developed in
the future.
Planning Director Johnson said that was correct, even though the
burden of responsibility to make that connection should rest with the
property to the south at a future date. He suggested the applicant
address this further as to how they feel about a future connection.
But staff is in full support of making that connection. We were
perplexed as to why the property owner to the south was in such
strong objection to provide a connection that would be a great benefit
to their retail establishments.
Chairman Alderson said any additional questions, on this matter, could
be asked of the applicant and suggested the Commissioners move on
to other topics.
158
-5-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
Discussion then followed on the various positive and negative points
of including Acacia trees versus Robustas in certain areas of the
landscaping.
There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Alderson opened
the public hearing portion of the meeting and asked if the applicant
would like to speak.
Mr. Richard Wasserman, representing the applicant (Levitan
Development), P 0 Box 5909, La Quinta 92248, introduced himself
and offered to answer the Commissioners' questions. He gave some
background on the principals of the property to the south and added
he had tried communicating with them countless times and they
would not respond about shared interests on the two properties. He
commented on the lack of success he had on the possible mitigation
of mutual dust control issues. Out of the many times they had tried to
work with that owner, they had not had a lot of success.
Mr. Wasserman continued on the subject of the entrance to the south.
He said they had two issues; 1) the underground storage containment
system at that location, which would end up in the middle of the
drivable road, and 2). the lack of good visibility when going from
south to the north. Those issues would probably mitigate that from
being practical, taken as after -the -fact.
Commissioner Weber asked the applicant if the connection could be of
benefit to their project and if they would be amenable to making that
connection if it made sense in the future.
Mr. Wasserman said yes, but then mentioned the disparities in the
elevation of the adjacent property which he believed to be in excess of
six feet.
Commissioner Weber said it did not appear there was a six foot
elevation difference there now.
Mr. Wasserman expanded upon the height differential.
Commissioner Weber asked if he was agreeable to looking at
solutions.
159
WOE
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
Mr. Wasserman said yes; especially if they could mitigate the traffic
issues of crossing traffic on to the property.
Chairman Alderson asked about the hours of operation.
Mr. Wasserman said 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., in the winter, and 7:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m., in the summer as they changed seasonally.
General discussion followed regarding the drainage plan; including the
applicant's comment that the drainage plan was included in the civil,
and not the landscaping plans.
Planning Director Johnson said staff had not provided the Commission
with the civil plans, but if there was a concern, staff could work with
Public Works to re -visit this issue, when the civil plans were reviewed,
and make sure that adequate drainage was provided in those areas.
Chairman Alderson brought up the issue of the four trees on the north
side and said he would like to discuss the matter with the landscape
architect.
Mr. Wasserman said the landscape architect was available to address
the Commissioners' issues.
Chairman Alderson said the Commissioners had commented on re-
introducing the four trees that had been removed as a vehicle to
soften the elevations of the two buildings from the south heading
north. He suggested putting a slender tree, with a canopy on it that
would stand above the car wash and not have a ball on it so big that it
would be confined by the footing of the adjacent fences. A tree like
that might be advantageous to soften the elevation of the building.
Commissioner Quill suggested a Robusta palm tree.
Mr. Wasserman said he understood conceptually, but they were in a
hole relative to the northern property which would almost make this
impossible; especially with the existing trees and walls, to have any
trees in that area.
Discussion followed regarding:
160
-7-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
• Height differences between the properties
• The neighboring wall
• The garden wall
• Concerns about the footings if trees were planted
• The softening effect of adding more trees
Mr. Wasserman suggested the Commissioners visit the site to look at
the situation as it might resolve some of their concerns.
Chairman Alderson asked Mr. Wasserman to confirm there would be
wrought iron fence (gates), on either end, with ground cover between
the north wall and the building.
Mr. Wasserman said they were probably going to put in a large
aggregate to maintain a nice fresh look. He added this would allow
the water to flow through properly and they would be able to maintain
the drainage system that runs through there. The gates, on both
sides, are there to help mitigate any problems of people going through
there. He said they would love to include plants there, but it is an
extremely small area and does not receive any light throughout the
day.
Chairman Alderson and Commissioner Barrows agreed that it would be
difficult to grow anything in there.
General discussion followed on the ground cover and maintenance of
that area.
Commissioner Barrows said she had a question for the landscape
architect.
Chairman Alderson thanked Mr. Wasserman.
Mr. Wasserman asked if he could return to the podium, after the
Commissions' discussion with the landscape architect, as he had
additional issues to address.
Chairman Alderson said he would be brought back.
Mr. Paul Sturwold, 43-310 Alabama Street, Palm Desert, landscape
architect, introduced himself and offered to answer any questions.
-g-
161
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
Commissioner Barrows said she could not tell, by the legend, if the
trees on the south side of the building were Mediterranean Fan Palm
or Washingtonia.
Mr. Sturwold said they are somewhat similar, but they were both
palms. He then described the layout and plant palette.
Commissioner Barrows asked if one of the conditions of approval
recommended the two Mediterranean Fan Palms on the south side of
the building be replaced with Washingtonias.
Staff said yes.
Commissioner Barrows then commented on softening the southern
exposure by including some taller trees, possibly palms.
Mr. Sturwold said they were also after that effect; however, there
was a fine line between hiding the building and softening the view.
General discussion followed on the possibility of adding more palm
trees.
Mr. Sturwold commented that once the Acacia Salicinas got going
they would help soften the view.
Commissioner Barrows said she did not think they would have enough
height to achieve the proper effect since it would be hard for a tree to
grow in the five foot stretch between the building and the wall.
Mr. Sturwold said yes it would be hard to do, but palms would be a
good substitution. He added he did not think they were necessary
since the project would derive a lot of benefit from the adjacent
property and their huge mesquite trees.
Mr. Sturwold added that the barrel cactus were meant to be a desert
statement and were basically to be kept in the island area, away from
traffic. So, with that placement he didn't know if it was a concern.
He added most people try to stay away from Barrel Cactus.
Commissioner Barrows said the Golden Barrel is a little better than
some, but possibly those could be relocated. She then asked if the
Texas Ranger and Oleanders could be replaced with more native
162
IVII
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
materials and commented on the lack of use of native flora.
Mr. Sturwold said there was always room for substitutions, but he
made those plant choices because of maintenance issues. He has
been in the desert for 26 year and had a pretty good feel for what
worked and what didn't.
Commissioner Barrows said that was a fair point.
Mr. Sturwold said if there was the possibility of bringing in a good
native plant that works, he would welcome bringing it in.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any other questions of Mr.
Sturwold. Hearing none he asked Mr. Wasserman to return to the
podium.
Mr. Wasserman returned to address the lighting issue. He explained
where the lighting would be and where/why there were hot spots on
the photometric study.
General discussion followed on the lighting plan, specific lighting
areas, type and height of light fixtures and off -site spillover.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any more questions of the
applicant.
There being none he asked if there was any public comment. There
being none, Chairman Alderson closed the public hearing and opened
the matter for Commission discussion.
Commissioner Quill commented that he appreciated the fact that the
applicant had flipped the building, as previously requested by the
Commission, and that they had worked very hard to put in the
additional access to the south of this project. He agreed with
Commissioner Barrow's comment on utilizing native plants and added
this was a nice looking car wash, but he did not feel it was in the right
location.
General discussion then followed on addressing each Commissioner's
concerns, in the conditions, and the proper framing of the motion.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
163
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Weber to adopt Minute Motion
2011-001 recommending approval of Final Landscaping Plan 2010-
053 as conditioned in the staff report with the following revisions:
a. Whenever possible, native Colorado desert species be
incorporated into the landscaping.
b. Planning Staff will revisit the Drainage Plan to ensure proper
drainage will occur.
C. Planning Staff will revisit the photometric study and lighting
plan to ensure that the lighting is appropriate and balanced for
the project.
d. Condition No. 107 shall remain as is.
Unanimously approved.
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS:
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
A. Thank you letter submitted to Council, by Ed Alderson, on behalf of the
Commissioners who attended the Planners' Institute. General discussion
of the Conference followed.
B. Invitation from the Coachella Valley Water District for their Water
Awareness Tour on May 20, 2011. Chairman Alderson commented that
the tour was very worthwhile and encouraged other Commissioners to
attend.
Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Report of the City Council Meetings of March 15, 2011, April 5,
2011, and April 19, 2011. General comment on pertinent agenda
items from the various meetings. Staff advised the Commission of a
Special Meeting on June 14, 2011, at 3:00 p.m., for interview and
appointment of new commissioners. (Two Planning Commissioners
are up for consideration.)
B. Commissioner Barrows is scheduled to attend the May 3, 2011, City
Council meeting.
164
-11-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 26, 2011
C. Commissioner Weber commented on the Riverside County Planning
Commission's recommendation for approval of the Thermal
Motorsports project and its impact on La Quinta and the Coachella
Valley.
IX: DIRECTOR ITEMS:
A. Planning Director Johnson advised the Commissioners of the following
items being heard by the City Council in May: 1). Mayer Villa Capri
time extension on May 3, 2011, and 21. Eden Rock second time
extension on May 17, 2011.
B. Planning Director Johnson advised the Commissioners that SCAG, for
the third consecutive year, will have their annual meeting here at the
La Quinta Resort, on May 5 and 6, 2011. He added that it was quite
an honor to have that large of an event in our community. He
encouraged the Commissioners to attend.
X. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved by Commissioners
Weber/Wilkinson to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission
to the next meeting to be held on May 10, 2011. This meeting was
adjourned at 8:37 p.m. on April 26, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
CarolynWe ker,Executive Secretar
Y
City of La Quinta, California
-12-
165
REPORTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 2-I
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
June 14, 2011 7:03 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to
order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Alderson.
PRESENT: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman
Alderson.
ABSENT: Commissioners Weber.
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Les Johnson, City Attorney Kathy
Jenson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Planning
Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Andrew
Mogensen, Associate Planner Jay Wuu, and
Executive Secretary Carolyn Walker.
Il. PUBLIC COMMENT:
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
There being no comments, or suggestions, it was moved by
Commissioners Wilkinson/Barrows to approve the minutes of April 26,
2011 as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Wilkinson and
Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Quill,
and Weber. ABSTAIN: None.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Environmental Assessment 2010-610, Specific Plan 2004-
071,Amendment No. 1, Site Development Permit 2003-762
Extension No. 4, and Amendment No. 1; a request by WSL La Quinta,
LLC, for consideration of development plans for La Paloma, a 208-unit
166
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
senior living community located on the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Avenue 50.
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department.
Commissioner Quill joined the meeting at 7:07 p.m.
Planning Director Johnson stated staff had just a received a letter,
from MSA Consulting, and needed time to review the changes
requested in the letter. (Copy distributed to the Commissioners). He
recommended the Commission take public testimony and continue the
item to the next meeting to allow adequate time for Planning and
Public Works staff to review and adequately respond to the request.
Chairman Alderson noted the suggestion and asked if there were any
questions of staff.
There being none from other Commissioners, Chairman Alderson
asked for clarification on the height of the towers and what the client
was requesting.
Staff responded the client was asking for 36-feet, instead of 28-feet,
on the one tower feature, which would be the highest projection.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any violations with parking.
Staff responded there were no violations and commented on carports
and proper shading for parking areas without carports.
Chairman Alderson commented on the north property line and the new
fence planned. Staff said the plans called for a new wall spanning the
entire northern property line. Where there were fences or existing
walls, it would be up to the property owners to work out an
agreement with La Paloma to tear down and replace those walls.
There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Alderson opened
the public hearing portion of the meeting and asked if the applicant
would like to speak.
Mr. John Rimbach, President of West Living (WSL La Quinta, LLC),
5796 Armada Drive, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92208, introduced
2_ 167
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
himself and said they were the owners of the site, and then gave
some background on acquisition of the property. He explained the
previous plans and said they were ' now designing this project as a
straight rental project with a full continuum of care, residential -based
care from independent living, assisted living, and a small
Alzheimer/dementia component. They have eliminated the nursing
home component from the prior project plan. The project is now
deemed to be more affordable and more economically viable, than the
previous project plans. He then explained the licensing requirements
and said his development team would come up to answer questions
and give further details on the project.
Chairman Alderson asked Mr. Rimbach about the new plan for rental,
instead of sales, of the units. He then asked about the monthly rates
on the units. Mr. Rimbach explained the continuum of care within the
project and said the monthly rates had not yet been established.
Gregory Irwin, Irwin Partners Architects (IPA) 245 Fischer Avenue,
Suite B-2, Costa Mesa CA 92626, introduced himself and said they
had spent a lot of time looking at what was previously approved and
tried to create a project that would make them better neighbors than
what was previously approved. He had one correction, noting the
tower entry piece was actually below the height limit. The difference
between the roof and what would make it an architectural projection
was off. He then explained further why it was still within the actual
height limit.
Chairman Alderson asked about the color palette and the blue element
shown, which was actually clear glass and not an additional color
element. Mr. Irwin confirmed it was glass.
Discussion followed on the color palette, the garage doors and the use
of opaque glass.
Mr. Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, 34-20 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho
Mirage, CA - introduced himself and said they had been the project
engineers on this property since 1987. He then gave some
background on the property. He commented on the letter they
submitted saying it actually was only about four comments, because
some of the items were just notations. He understood the staff's
need to review the letter since there were concerns from their
southern neighbor, UHC, who had a representative present to discuss
Im
-3-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
it from their perspective. He then commented on the following letter
points:
• Driveway alignment on Avenue 50
• Left in/left out movements
• Improvements on Avenue 50, east of their proposed entry
• Direct discharge into the evacuation channel
• A U-turn lane southbound on Washington
• A uniform wall on the northern boundary
• Dropping the site and including a retaining wall.
General discussion then followed regarding dropping the site,
importing fill, and the design of the retaining wall.
Mr. Roos also stated the letter requested that the site development
permit approval be for two years, rather than one, and explained why.
Mr. Ron Gregory Project Landscape Architect with RGA Landscape
Architects — 74020 Alessandro Drive, Palm Desert, CA — introduced
himself and commented on the earlier statements made regarding the
multitude of fountains within the project, as well as the mention of the
lawn area. He explained how they have to figure water calculations,
as required by the State, the Water District, and the City. He said
they have to use a water factor for different types of plant materials,
and that is also used for fountains. He explained how the factors
were utilized for any body of water as well as all landscaping. He
continued by saying water, and especially in smaller recirculating
water features, will be very important to people who will be living
there. So, he hoped that would be taken into consideration. He told
how a question was brought up, at ALRC, regarding the use of turf for
the putting green and the pool area. The turf that is being used on the
putting green is all faux turf, and will require no water. The turf that
is being used in the pool area is real turf and is cooler. Faux turf is
actually as hot as a paved surface would be. He added that even with
the use of real turf, they still fit within the maximum water use
guidelines. The rest of their landscaping was all water -efficient and
desert -type material.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked about recovering the condensation off
of air conditioning and using it to fill fountains, etc.
Mr. Gregory said their firm was currently working on two projects
4 169
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
taking that into account and the problem was that it was
extraordinarily expensive.
General discussion followed regarding the recovery of air conditioning
condensation and various components of LEED certification.
General discussion followed on faux turf versus real turf, and under
what circumstances their individual uses are appropriate.
Commissioner Barrows asked for Mr. Gregory's comments on why
more native species are not being used and gave some examples of
non-native species that are used frequently in their place.
Mr. Gregory gave anecdotal evidence of projects he was currently
working on using native species. He said one of the problems with
native plants was that some of them had a very short shelf life. A
plant such as brittle bush requires a fair amount of maintenance and
doesn't tend to last as long as some of the non-native species. The
other problem was that the native plants typically put on a great show
in late winter and early spring, then they weren't at their best the rest
of the year. He said they were trying to introduce more of them,
especially as they are being encouraged to do so in the pursuit of
higher LEED scores. He added there was a problem with finding a
sufficient quantity of native plants for projects of this size.
Commissioner Barrows said this project seemed like a really good
opportunity to use native plants. She then asked about the water
features and commented on staff's recommendations that the smaller
water features seemed appropriate but they were concerned about the
entry water feature. The entry water feature only provided an
aesthetic benefit and no other usage, such as folks walking over and
sitting around the feature. She asked for Mr. Gregory for his
perspective on that feature.
Mr. Gregory said, at first, he didn't understand what was meant by
more than just an aesthetic feature, but he now understood about
people gathering around and enjoying the benefits of the water
feature.
General discussion followed on:
What other purposes the water feature could/should serve.
s 170
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
• The current design of the water feature
• Additional discussion of the recycling of air conditioning
condensation and its possible uses.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any more questions of the
applicant.
There being none he asked if there was any public comment.
Mr. David Pendergrass, representative for James A. Shirley
Construction Co., 5462 Jurpe Avenue, Riverside CA - introduced
himself and commented on how much he appreciated the fact that
staff, and the developer, worked with him to have an opportunity to
competitively bid on a project like this. He said it was just such a
difference from what he had previously experienced in other
communities. He wanted to take the opportunity to say thank you
and added that it was good that the City apparently was working with
local contractors and because of that his firm supported a project like
this.
Chairman Alderson said it was very good to hear that local people
were being considered.
Mr. Mark Irving- Urban Housing Communities, 2000 East Fourth
Street, Suite 205, Santa Ana CA 92705 - introduced himself and said
he was at the meeting for several purposes. First, he was
representing the owners of the property to the south of this project,
who were also part of the specific plan originally approved in 2004.
He stated they were still under that specific plan.
He continued, with his second point, saying he was at the meeting to
try to protect the left in on their property, currently within the specific
plan. The ingress into the property would be on Avenue 50;
otherwise they just have right ins and right outs. So, it is very
important to make sure they maintain that. Third, his firm was in
support of the applicant's project. Fourth, they were asking staff to
review the condition of approval regarding realigning the driveways
and providing ingress and egress. He said they were supportive of
that effort. Fifth, he agreed with the location and use of the entry
fountain. He explained a similar situation where the fountain acted as
a noise buffer and he agreed with the current design.
171
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
Chairman Alderson asked if there was any further public comment.
There being none, Chairman Alderson did not close the public hearing
since the matter was going to be continued. He suggested a
continuation of two weeks to allow time for staff to review this as the
letter had not been received until late afternoon on the day of the
meeting..
Planning Director Johnson asked the Chairman if either he, or any of
the other Commissioners, had any items for staff to discuss with the
applicant, prior to the continued meeting, to bring them forward so
staff would have that opportunity.
Chairman Alderson said he would like staff to clarify the alignment of
the driveways and confirm whether the project on the south was still
included in the specific plan.
Commissioner Quill commented on several items:
• This was a more viable project than the previous one.
• He agreed with the approval of the Site Development Permit for
two years, instead of one.
• There should be real turf where there is a recreational
component (i.e., swimming pools).
• He agreed with Commissioner Barrows' comments regarding
the use of native species.
• He agreed with direct discharge, into the channel, if there were
no issues involved, it was done under an SWPPP, and the
water was cleaned up as it went out.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to continue the public
hearing recommending approval of Specific Plan 2004-071,
Amendment No. 1, to June 28, 2011.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows,. Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 201 1-103; a request by the City of La
Quinta for consideration of the following amendments to the La Quinta
Municipal Code: A clarification regarding the location of certain
landscaped parkways (§9.50.100), Correcting an error regarding guest
172
-7-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
houses and secondary units (§9.140.070), Adjusting the time
extension period for development review permits (§9.200.080),
Deletion of obsolete language referencing guesthouse examples
(§9.210.010), Revised definitions of child day care uses to be
consistent with State Law (§9.280.030), and Extend the maximum
permitted cul-de-sac length to 1320 feet (§13.24.070), to be effective
City -Wide.
Principal Planner Mogensen presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Quill had no questions but commented on the positive
nature of the change for the permitted cul-de-sac length going from
660 to 1320 feet.
Chairman Alderson said he had no further questions, but did mention
staff did a good job of analysis in clearing up these items.
There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Alderson noted
the City was the applicant and asked if there was any public
comment.
There being none, Chairman Alderson closed the public hearing and
opened the matter for Commission discussion.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
201 1-004 recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment
2011-103 as submitted in the staff report.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2011-005 recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment
2011-103, cul-de-sac amendment as submitted in the staff report.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
-8- 173
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: None
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Discussion of the recent City Council Meetings. It was decided the
meetings of June 7, and June 21, 2011 would be discussed at the
next regularly scheduled Commission meeting.
B. Commissioner Wilkinson is scheduled to attend the June 21, 2011,
City Council meeting.
C. The new City Council Meeting Attendance Schedule will be included in
the June 28, 2011, packet.
D. A brief discussion of the. Summer Schedule was held. It was decided
it would be discussed further, and date(s) chosen, at the next regularly
scheduled Commission meeting.
IX: DIRECTOR ITEMS: None
X. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved . by Commissioners
Wilkinson/Barrows to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to the next meeting to be held on June 28, 2011. This meeting
was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. on June 14, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn Iker, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
174
f
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 19, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Making a Request to the
City of Indio to Complete the Necessary Studies to
Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act
regarding Future Goldenvoice Concerts at the Indio
Polo Fields
RECOMMENDATION:
As deemed appropriate by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
No direct fiscal implications; however, previous concerts have provided indirect fiscal
benefit to La Quinta in the form of increased tenant occupancy tax and sales tax
revenues. If the future concerts are cancelled, some revenue to the City may be lost.
These benefits have not been quantified.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Over the past several years, numerous concerts (most notably the Coachella Music and
Arts Festival) have been held at the Indio Polo Fields. Land use matters associated
with the Indio Polo Fields, which consists of the Empire and El Dorado Polo Grounds,
are governed by Conceptual Specific Plan 94-10-4 (Specific Plan). The City of Indio
adopted the original Specific Plan in March, 1995. It identifies numerous land uses for
the 640± acre area, including residential, resort and equestrian uses. The Specific Plan
also includes a section addressing requirements applicable to special events, such as
concerts. A special events permit is required in order to hold special events.
An environmental assessment was completed for the Specific Plan. The assessment
175
concluded the adoption of the Specific Plan was exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based upon the theory that the impacts associated
with the Specific Plan had previously examined in the environmental impact report
(EIR) prepared in 1993 for the Indio General Plan. In 1998, the City of Indio amended
the Specific Plan, and again determined that the amendment was exempt from CEQA
for the same reasons as the original adoption of the Specific Plan, namely, that the
environmental impacts had been adequately assessed in the 1993 EIR prepared for the
Indio General Plan. The 1994 environmental assessment was general in nature, and
did not include information relative to large special event concerts. Based upon all of
the documentation provided by Indio to date, it appears that no CEQA review has been
conducted that specifically addresses the Indio Polo Field concerts.
In addition to the Specific Plan, a Development Agreement (DA) between the City of
Indio and Alexander Haagen was entered into in July, 1995. An amendment to the DA
was approved in February, 2006, which included additional property included in the
Specific Plan but not a part of the original DA. The DA does not grant the property
owner any entitlement to hold concerts at the Polo Fields.
As stated above, a special event permit is required for concerts at the Polo Fields. The
issuance of a special events permit is a "project" that is subject to CEQA. Historically,
special event permits for the concerts have been considered on an annual basis. The
Indio City Council is the decision making body for such permits. The Specific Plan
identifies review process guidelines that require addressing "issues of traffic, noise,
auto circulation, parking and access and similar matters."
Concerts at the Polo Fields began at the site in 1993. In 1999, the first "Coachella
Valley Music and Arts Festival" was held at the polo fields. The original "Coachella-
fest" was a two-day (Friday/Saturday) concert series that had approximately 25,000 in
daily attendance. The Coachella-fest did not return in 2000.
In 2001, Coachella returned as a one -day concert with approximately 25,000 in
attendance. In 2002, the festival returned to a two-day format (Friday/Saturday). The
event continued as a two-day concert series between 2002 and 2007. In 2003, the
festival permitted on -site camping at the Polo Fields. The event continued to grow in
popularity and by 2009, Coachella had reached its event capacity and limited daily
attendance to 80,000.
In 2007, a second music festival, "Stagecoach", was added to the weekend preceding
Coachella-fest. The Stagecoach festival has typically averaged an annual daily
attendance of 50,000.
In October of 2009, a one-time 3-day concert was held with over 40,000 in
attendance each day.
According to a website relating to the events, in 2011, Goldenvoice LLC, the concert
176
promoter, sold approximately 55,000 tickets for each day of the Stagecoach event,
and approximately 75,000 tickets for each day of the Coachella-fest. In 2011, a third
festival was added between the Coachella and Stagecoach weekends. The festival,
titled "The Big 4", was a one -day concert series featuring four heavy-metal bands that
saw approximately 45,000 in attendance.
A few weeks following the conclusion of the 2011 concerts, Goldenvoice announced
that two Coachella-fest events would be held on succeeding weekends in 2012.
Goldenvoice informed Indio and La Quinta city staff that Stagecoach would continue to
follow Coachella-fest and that no additional concerts were being proposed.
Comments were received from numerous La Quinta residents during and following the
2011 concerts. The residents expressed concerns regarding noise, traffic, security and
hours of operations. All comments submitted to La Quinta staff were forwarded to
City of Indio staff for their consideration. As a result of the comments received, in
mid -June Indio staff scheduled a meeting for July 21 with La Quinta staff and
Goldenvoice to discuss in detail all comments received and the ability to mitigate
impacts.
Several residents also contacted La Quinta City Council members regarding this matter.
As a result, on the July 5th City Council meeting, under the "Mayor and Council
Member Items" portion of the agenda, the Council discussed the complaints about the
concerts. The discussion focused upon whether at a future Council meeting, the City
Council should consider whether a letter should be sent to the City of Indio requesting
compliance with CEQA for future concerts at the Polo Fields. During the July 5
meeting, Indio Council Member Torres, Indio Police Chief Ramos and several La Quinta
residents addressed City Council regarding this matter. The City Council directed the
City Manager to schedule this matter for business item consideration at the July 19
City Council meeting and, in the meantime, to meet and confer with the Indio City
Manager regarding this matter.
Two meetings were held on July 11 specific to the Indio Polo Fields concerts. First,
city staff met with representatives from Goldenvoice (Paul Tollett and Skip Paige). The
meeting primarily consisted of discussing concerns raised by residents and
Goldenvoice's plan to address and mitigate the impacts associated with its concerts.
Both representatives identified a strong willingness to fully consider and address all
comments received and emphasized the importance of being a good neighbor.
Later that same day, city staff met with Indio representatives regarding the Polo Fields
concerts. In response to the comments received from La Quinta and Indio residents,
Indio City Manager Martinez explained during the meeting that Indio staff and
Goldenvoice representatives were in the process of meeting with neighboring
residents. He provided a brief summary of a meeting recently held with Indio residents
north of Avenue 50. Mr. Martinez stated that they are early in the process of
scheduling meetings with multiple La Quinta communities close to the Polo Fields,
177
such as Rancho Santana, La Quinta Polo Estates, Mountain View Country Club,
Hideaway and Madison Club, as well as conducting community meetings for all
interested parties to attend. He expressed a strong desire to work closely with La
Quinta and Goldenvoice staff in an effort to fully address impacts associated with the
concerts.
If the Council's desire is to request that Indio comply with CEQA, the recommended
action would be to authorize the City Manager to submit a letter to the City of Indio
requesting such compliance prior to the issuance of any further special event permits.
This letter would need to be submitted prior to the date that the Indio City Council
considers the special use permits for the 2012 concerts. If the City of Indio proceeds
to issue the special event permits without first complying with CEQA, the City of La
Quinta would need to decide whether or not to pursue a CEQA challenge in court.
If the Council's desire is to work with the City of Indio and Goldenvoice to try to
reduce the impacts of the concerts on area residents outside of the context of CEQA,
then the Council may wish to direct staff to continue to work with Indio and
Goldenvoice and to report back to the Council at a future date.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
1. Direct the City of La Quinta staff to meet with the City of Indio Staff and the
representatives of of Goldenvoice, LLC to address the impacts of the concerts
at the Indio Polo Fields on La Quinta residents and to report back to the City
Council regarding the outcome of the efforts; or
2. Direct the City Manager to send a letter to the City of Indio requesting the City
of Indio to complete the necessary studies to comply with the California
Environmental Quality Act regarding future concerts at the Indio Polo Fields; or
3. Provide alternative direction to the City Council.
Respectfully su)fmitted,
John Planning Director
Approved for submission by:
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
178
AGENDA CATEGORY:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: JUIv 19. 2011 BUSINESS SESSION: 9-
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an Ordinance Electing to CONSENT CALENDAR: -
Comply with Part 1.9 of ABX1 27, the Redevelopment STUDY SESSION:
Continuation Act —
PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to take up Ordinance No. _, an ordinance of the City of La Quinta
determining it will comply with the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program
pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code in order to
permit the continued existence and operation of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency,
by title and number only and waive further reading.
Motion to Introduce Ordinance No. , an ordinance of the City of La Quinta
determining it will comply with the V_oluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program
pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code in order to
permit the continued existence and operation of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency,
on first reading.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Adoption of the proposed Ordinance will commit the City to remit certain annual
payments to the County auditor -controller for ultimate distribution to certain school
entities and special districts. If the City adopts the proposed Ordinance to participate
in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program, the City becomes obligated to
make the payments, but the legislation permits the Agency to reimburse the City for
the payment amount if the City and Agency enter into an agreement for that purpose.
RSG has estimated that the payment for the 201 1 /2012 Fiscal Year would be
$19,500,000. One-half of the payment would be due on January 15, 2012, and the
second half would be due on May 15, 2012. The payment in subsequent years would
also be due in two installments, payable on January 15 and May 15. The amount of
these payments would vary, depending upon that annual increase in the assessed
values of both Project Areas. The subsequent payments would begin in fiscal year
179
2012/2013; RSG projects that this payment would be $4,659,618. These figures are
estimates. On August 1, 2011, the Department of Finance will notify the City of its
fiscal year 2011-2012 remittance amount. The City will have 15 days to appeal the
calculation.
For the 2011 /2012 payment, the legislation allows the Agency to use up to 100% of
the amount the Agency would have deposited for 201 1 /2012 into its Low and
Moderate Income Housing Funds (the "Housing Fund") to make the payments if the
Agency finds that it has no other funds available. It is estimated that the 20% set
aside fund for 2011-2012 will be $13,602,880.
As the legislation now stands, there is no obligation to repay the Housing Fund.
However, the President Pro Tem of the Senate has stated that he intends to pursue
clean up legislation that would require that the Housing Fund be repaid. If such a
requirement were imposed, the Housing Fund would have to be repaid from either the
Agency's future non -housing funds or from the City's General Fund. Apart from the
201 1 /2012 Housing Fund deposit, no affordable housing funds may be used to
reimburse the City for the initial 201 1 /2012 payments or any of the subsequent
payments. Thus, the Agency's existing fund balances in its various affordable housing
accounts may not be used to reimburse the City for the payments. The Agency may
use any of its non -housing funds to reimburse the City for the payments with the
exception of the tax exempt bond proceeds.
The Finance Department has identified the means that the City and.Agency could
utilize to make the $19,500,000 payment for 201 1 /2012. The proposal would be to
use the 2011/2012 Housing Fund deposit of $13,602,880 and $5,897,120 of non -
housing tax increment funds designated for SilverRock improvements. RSG's tax
increment cash flow projections indicate that there is sufficient capacity in the Project
Area No. 1 and Project Area No. 2 non -housing funds to make subsequent years'
payments.
RSG has evaluated the fiscal implications of both adopting and not adopting the
proposed ordinance. If the ordinance is adopted, wherein the City/Agency would
participate in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment Program, the City/Agency
would make a total of $164,201,034 in payments (assuming 2% average annual
growth rate of assessed values). This amount entails the $19,402,144 payment for
2011-2012, and a projected $144,701,034 in subsequent years' payments. On a net
present value basis (utilizing a 6.5% discount rate) this total amount is $86,457,201.
The time period for this calculation is fiscal year 2011-2012 to 2039-2040, the end of
Project Area No. 2. During this period, the Agency would have the capacity to receive
(on a present value basis and utilizing a 6.5% discount rate) an additional
$44,900,000 of non -housing funds (after deducting current bond debt service
payments and additional pass -through payments to local schools), and $103,500,000
in Housing Fund deposits (assuming the current law is not modified).
RSG has worked with the Finance Department to identify the Agency's cash assets
(cash on hand and bond proceeds that could be reallocated to the State), and with a
Is 180
local real property appraiser to value the Agency's land assets. Based upon the
Dissolution Act legislation, if the City/Agency elected to dissolve, then all funds and
undeveloped lands would be subject to liquidation. Per the Dissolution Act, the
Agency's non -housing and Housing Fund cash, non -allocated bond proceeds, and land
that the Agency purchased but is not yet developed or the subject of a third party
agreement, is to be liquidated. The land assets would include the vacant properties
reserved for affordable housing development, the Highway 1 1 1 commercial property,
the Village properties, and the vacant land at SilverRock Resort. These assets total a
projected $100,008,073; the chart below identifies these assets:
Land
Asset Value
Non -housing $ 37,964,157
Housing 3,000,000
Total $ 40,964,157
Non -Housing Project Funding
PA1 8,637,657
PA2 2,417,324
Total $ 11,054,981
Housing Project Funding $ 9,059,253
2011 Bond Proceeds
PA 2 Non -housing 2,417,277
Financing Authority 25,512,405
Total $ 27,929,682
Total - Land/Assets $ 89,008,073
In Question
SRR Canal Funds* 11,000,000
* Tax Exempt Bond Funds
may be redeemed in 2012
Grand Total $ 100,008,073
While the City holds title to the land assets, the Dissolution Act provides that the State
may seize all land assets that were purchased since January 1, 2011, and all land
assets that were transferred to the City since January 1, 2011. It appears that the
.,« 181
Washington Street Apartments may not be subject to liquidation since it is an
operating affordable housing development and given the Federal rent restriction
covenants recorded against the property, this development must continue to operate
as an affordable housing development for another 20 years. Thus, this asset would
have limited liquidation value. Further, the Dissolution Act provides that the City or
the Housing Authority may continue to operate affordable housing properties.
If the Council chooses to participate in the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment
Program, an appropriation for the 201 1 /2012 payment and required findings will be
brought before the Agency Board at its August 2, 2011 meeting.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On June 29, 2011, Governor Brown signed several budget trailer bills to implement the
State Budget for Fiscal Year 2011/2012: ABX1 26 (the "Dissolution Act")
immediately suspends all new redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness,
and dissolves redevelopment agencies effective October 1, 201 1; and ABX1 27 (the
"Continuation Act") allows redevelopment agencies to avoid dissolution under the
Dissolution Act if their host cities/counties elect to comply with the alternative
redevelopment program described in Part 1.9 thereof. As applied in La Quinta, the
Continuation Act would require the City to commit to making certain payments
beginning in January of 2012, but would allow the Agency to transfer funding to the
City for the purpose of making the payments. For the initial year payments, the
transfers can come from the Agency's 2011-2012 housing funds. There is no
obligation to repay the housing fund for the amounts used.
In the event the City does not elect to comply with the Continuation Act, the Agency
will be limited to performing its current contractual obligations, and as of October 1,
2011, the Agency will be officially dissolved. The City, as the Agency's "successor
agency" (if the City elects to be the successor agency) would take over performance
of the Agency's current contractual obligations. In that event, the City's actions as
the successor agency would be monitored by an "oversight board," comprised of
seven members, of which only one member would be representing the City's
interests.' The basic function of the successor agency would be to liquidate the
Agency's assets and pay off its debt.
Assuming there is sufficient Agency funding to make the anticipated payments, the
1 The members of the oversight board would include two members appointed by the Riverside County Board
of Supervisors, one member appointed by the Mayor of the City, one member appointed by the County
Superintendent of Education, one member appointed by the Chancellor of California Community Colleges, one
member appointed by the largest special district taxing entity, and one member appointed by the Mayor, representing
the former employees of the Agency.
182
City Council may adopt an ordinance declaring the City's decision to comply with the
Continuation Act in order to enable the Agency to resume its redevelopment activities.
If such an ordinance is introduced on July 19, 2011, the second reading of the
ordinance would occur on August 2, 2011. Pursuant to the new legislation, the
Agency's powers would be restored as of the date that the ordinance is enacted,
which occurs upon its second reading. Thus, the Agency's powers could be restored
as early as August 2, 2011, if the recommended action is taken.
Redevelopment reform legislation will likely be passed in the near future that further
restricts redevelopment activities for revived redevelopment agencies. At this juncture,
it is not possible to outline what those reforms might include. Based upon the draft
legislation that had been discussed both prior to and since the adoption of the budget,
the reform legislation may prohibit the use of Agency funds for projects such as golf
courses. In addition, funding of affordable housing may be more strictly regulated.
The City Attorney's office has prepared the attached draft ordinance ("Draft
Ordinance") for the purpose of making the election for the Agency to continue in
existence. The Draft Ordinance is intended to preserve the City's and Agency's rights
should any of the legal challenges to the Dissolution Act and Continuation Act
succeed. The Draft Ordinance is based upon a model ordinance released recently by
the California Redevelopment Association ("CRA"). The CRA and the League of
California Cities (the "League") each plan to file a lawsuit challenging the Dissolution
Act and the Continuation Act. It is anticipated that the litigation will be filed prior to
the July 19`h Council meeting.
There are many uncertainties relating to the decision to move forward with an "opt in"
ordinance at this juncture. First, although the Draft Ordinance is based upon the CRA
model ordinance and is written in a way that is intended preserve the City's and
Agency's rights, should there be a successful challenge to the Dissolution Act and
Continuation Act, there is at least some risk that by adopting the Draft Ordinance, the
City could be barred from rescinding its commitment to make the payments. It would
also likely be difficult to seek a return of the payment made prior to the ruling.
Second, the payment obligations in the Continuation Act are imposed directly on the
City, and not on the Agency. As such, if the funds were not available from the
Agency, the City would be required to make the payment out of its general fund or
permit the Agency to be dissolved. RSG and the Finance Director have indicated that
there are or will be sufficient RDA funds to meet the RDA's existing obligations and
the anticipated payments. It is possible that short term general funds loans may be
required in the future for the City to be able to make the payments
There are also obvious risks associated with not "opting in" prior to the deadline.
These risks includes loss of existing Agency funds, loss of all future Agency funds,
loss of Agency property, and an unwinding of various City -Agency transactions.
The law firm of Goldfarb and Lipman has circulated a very complete summary of the
4 183
new legislation, including the "opt in" procedures and the consequences of not electing
to continue. A copy of that summary is attached hereto as Attachment 1.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Motion to take up Ordinance No. _, an ordinance of the City of La Quinta
determining it will comply with the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment
Program pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety
Code in order to permit the continued existence and operation of the La Quinta
Redevelopment Agency, by title and number only and waive further reading; and
2. Motion to Introduce Ordinance No. _, an ordinance of the City of La Quinta
determining it will comply with the Voluntary Alternative Redevelopment
Program pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety
Code in order to permit the continued existence and operation of the La Quinta
Redevelopment Agency, on first reading; Do not adopt an ordinance declaring its
the City's intention to comply with Part 1.9 of ABX1 27;
3. Consider this item at a subsequent City Council meeting;
4. Provide staff with alternative direction.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie Powell
Economic Development/Housing Manager
Approved for submission by:
A4 /� - 4f,4� ..-
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Goldfarb and Lipman Summary
1 184
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING IT WILL COMPLY WITH THE VOLUNTARY
ALTERNATIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PURSUANT
TO PART 1.9 OF DIVISION 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE
CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND OPERATION OF THE LA
QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta ("City") approved and
adopted (i) the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Project Area No. 1 ("Project Area No.
1 " or "Project Area No. 1 Redevelopment Plan," as applicable) on November 29, 1983,
by Ordinance No. 43; and (ii) the Redevelopment Plan for La Quinta Redevelopment
Project Area No. 2 ("Project Area No. 2" or "Project Area No. 2 Redevelopment Plan,"
as applicable) on May 16, 1989, by Ordinance No. 139, as amended on December 20,
1994, by Ordinance No. 259, on February 3, 2004, by Ordinance No. 399, on March
16, 2004, by Ordinance No. 403, and on March 16, 2004, by Ordinance No. 404; and
WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is engaged in
activities to execute and implement the Project Area No. 1 Redevelopment Plan and
the Project Area No. 2 Redevelopment Plan (collectively, the "Redevelopment
Plans") pursuant to the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law
(Health and Safety Code § 33000, et sec.) ("CRL"); and
WHEREAS, since adoption of the Redevelopment Plans, the Agency has
undertaken redevelopment projects in Project Area No. 1 and in Project Area No. 2
(collectively, the "Project Areas") to eliminate and prevent blight, to improve public
facilities and infrastructure, to renovate and construct affordable housing, and to
enter into partnerships with private industries to create jobs and expand the local
economy; and
WHEREAS, over the next few years, the Agency hopes to implement a
variety of redevelopment projects and programs to continue to eliminate and
prevent blight, stimulate and expand the Project Areas' economic growth, create
and develop local job opportunities, improve and expand affordable housing, and
alleviate deficiencies in public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California
Legislature has recently enacted and the Governor has signed, companion bills
11 185
Ordinance No.
Election re Alternate Redevelopment Program
Adopted: August 2, 2011
Page 2
ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, requiring that each redevelopment agency be dissolved
unless the community that created it enacts an ordinance committing it to make
certain payments; and
WHEREAS, specifically, ABX1 26 prohibits redevelopment agencies from
taking numerous actions, effective immediately and purportedly retroactively, and
additionally provides that redevelopment agencies are deemed to be dissolved as of
October 1, 2011; and
WHEREAS, ABX1 27 provides that a community may participate in an
"Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program," in order to enable a
redevelopment agency within that community to remain in existence and carry out
the provisions of the CRL, by enacting an ordinance agreeing to comply with Part
1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code; and
WHEREAS, the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program requires that
the community agree by ordinance to remit specified annual amounts to the county
auditor -controller; and
WHEREAS, under the threat of dissolution pursuant to ABX1 26, and upon
the contingencies and reservations set forth herein, the City shall make the Fiscal
Year 2011-2012 community remittance, currently estimated to be Nineteen Million
Five Hundred Dollars ($19,500,000), as well as the subsequent annual community
remittances as set forth in the CRL; and
WHEREAS, the City reserves the right to appeal the California Director of
Finance's determination of the Fiscal Year 2011-12 community remittance, as
provided in Health and Safety Code Section 34194; and
WHEREAS, City understands and believes that an action challenging the
constitutionality of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 will be filed on behalf of cities, counties
and redevelopment agencies; and
WHEREAS, while the City currently intends to make these community
remittances, the remittances shall be made under protest and without prejudice to
1B6
Ordinance No.
Election re Alternate Redevelopment Program
Adopted: August 2, 2011
Page 3
the City's right to recover such amounts and interest thereon, to the extent there is
a final determination that ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 are unconstitutional; and
WHEREAS, the City reserves the right, regardless of any community
remittance made pursuant to this Ordinance, to challenge the legality of ABX1 26
and ABX1 27; and
WHEREAS, to the extent a court of competent jurisdiction enjoins, restrains,
or grants a stay on the effectiveness of the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment
Program's payment obligation of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, the City shall not be
obligated to make any community remittance for the duration of such injunction,
restraint, or stay; and
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California,
does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. Participation in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment
Program. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34193, and based
on the Recitals set forth above, the City Council hereby determines that the City
shall comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety
Code, as enacted by ABX1 27.
Section 3. Payment Under Protest. Except as set forth in Section 4,
below, the City Council hereby determines that the City shall make the community
remittances set forth in Health and Safety Code section 34194 et seq.
Section 4. Effect of Stay or Determination of Invalidity. City shall not
make any community remittance in the event a court of competent jurisdiction
either grants a stay on the enforcement of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 or determines
that ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 are unconstitutional and therefore invalid, and all
appeals therefrom are exhausted or unsuccessful, or time for filing an appeal
therefrom has lapsed. Any community remittance shall be made under protest and
without prejudice to the City's right to recover such amount and interest thereon in
187
Ordinance No.
Election re Alternate Redevelopment Program
Adopted: August 2, 2011
Page 4
the event that there is a final determination that ABX1 26 and ABX1 27 are
unconstitutional and therefore invalid. If there is a final determination that ABX1
26 and ABX1 27 are unconstitutional and therefore invalid, this Ordinance shall be
deemed to be null and void and of no further force or effect.
Section 5. Implementation. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs
the City Manager to take any action and execute any documents necessary to
implement this Ordinance, including but not limited to notifying the Riverside
County Auditor -Controller, the Controller of the State of California, and the
California Department of Finance of the adoption of this Ordinance and the City's
agreement to comply with the provisions of Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the Health
and Safety Code, as set forth in ABX1 27.
Section 6. Additional Understandings and Intent. It is the understanding
and intent of the City Council that, once the Agency is again authorized to enter
into agreements under the CRL, the City will enter into an agreement with the
Agency as authorized pursuant to Section 34194.2, whereby the Agency will
transfer annual portions of its tax increment to the City in amounts not to exceed
the annual community remittance payments to enable the City, directly or
indirectly, to make the annual remittance payments. The City Council does not
intend, by enactment of this Ordinance, to pledge any of its general fund revenues
or assets to make the remittance payments.
Section 7. CEQA. The City Council finds, under Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4), that this Ordinance is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in that it is not
a "project," but instead consists of the creation and continuation of a governmental
funding mechanism for potential future projects and programs, and does not
commit funds to any specific project or program. The City Council, therefore,
directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of
Riverside in accordance with CEQA Guidelines.
Section 8. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that
constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located
at the City Clerk's office located at 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California
9225. The custodian for these records is Veronica Montecino.
Section 9. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity
shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be
given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it
Ordinance No.
Election re Alternate Redevelopment Program
Adopted: August 2, 2011
Page 5
would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular
portion thereof.
Section 10. Certification; Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once
within 15 days of adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published within the City of La Quinta, and shall post a certified copy of this
Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City
Clerk in accordance with Government Code § 36933.
Section 11. Date of Revival of Powers. Pursuant to Health & Safety
Code Section 34193(a), the Agency shall continue to exist and carry out the
provisions of the CRL as of the date of enactment of the Ordinance, August 2,
2011.
Section 12. Effective Date. Except as provided in Health & Safety Code
Section 34193(a), this Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and
after the date of final passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta
City Council held this 2nd of August, 2011, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DON ADOLPH, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
VERONICA MONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk
It 189
Ordinance No.
Election re Alternate Redevelopment Program
Adopted: August 2, 2011
Page 6
City of La Quinta, California
APROVED AS TO FORM:
M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
190
ATTACHMENT 1
goldfarb
li p.m a n
attorneys
Oakland Los Angeles San Diego
tY OF ENACTED STATE
LEGISLATION
ING REDEVELOPMENT
AND ABX 1 27)
Y6,2011
posed cleanup legislation and
Lipman intends to update this
to get the most up-to-date
510 836 6336
213 627 6336
619 239 6336
191
oldfarb & lipman
Table of Contents
PART A. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE....................................................I
I. Introduction and Overview of Redevelopment Restructuring
Acts 1
II. Potential Litigation................................................................................2
III. Additional Potential Redevelopment Legislation.................................3
PARTB. DISSOLUTION ACT...........................................................................5
I.
Introduction...........................................................................................5
II.
Suspension of RDA Activities and Preservation of RDA Assets
andRevenues.........................................................................................5
III.
Permitted and Required RDA Activities Prior to Dissolution..............7
IV.
Treatment of Agreements between a RDA and its Sponsoring
Community or Other Public Agency/Public Entity ..............................8
V.
Dissolution of RDAs/Creation of Successor Agencies .......................10
VI.
Transfer of Housing Functions of Former RDA.................................10
VII.
Role of Successor Agencies................................................................11
VIII.
Oversight Boards.................................................................................13
IX.
Role of County Auditor-Controller.....................................................14
X.
Payments from Trust Fund..................................................................14
XI.
Miscellaneous......................................................................................16
PART C. ALTERNATIVE VOLUNTARY REDEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMACT................................................................................17
I. "Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program" Opt-In..................17
II. Sources and Uses of Remittances........................................................17
III. Calculation of FY 2011-2012 Remittances.........................................19
IV. Calculation of FY 2012-2013 Remittances.........................................20
V. Calculation of Remittances for FY 2013-2014 and Beyond...............21
VI. Sanctions for Failure to Make Remittances........................................22
VII. Miscellaneous......................................................................................22
PART D. KEY MILESTONES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
REDEVELOPMENT RESTRUCTURING ACTS .............................23
I. Milestones Related To Voluntary Program Act..................................23
II. Milestones Related To Dissolution Act..............................................25
i
990051\1M9994.4 1 192
PART A. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
I. Introduction and Overview of Redevelopment Restructuring Acts
Governor Brown has now signed several budget trailer bills to implement the State
Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-2012 that was approved by the Legislature and
sent to the Governor on the evening of June 28, 2011.
Among the signed trailer bills are two addressing redevelopment that significantly
modify the California Community Redevelopment Law (the "CRL"): ABx1 26
(the "Dissolution Act") and ABxl 27 (the "Voluntary Program Act"; and together
with the Dissolution Act, the "Redevelopment Restructuring Acts").' If upheld
against anticipated constitutional challenge, the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts
will fundamentally alter the future of California redevelopment.
Working in tandem:
(1) The Dissolution Act first immediately suspends all new
redevelopment activities and incurrence of indebtedness, 2 and dissolves
redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") effective October 1, 2011; and
(2) The Voluntary Program Act then allows RDAs to avoid dissolution
under the Dissolution Act by opting into an "alternative voluntary
redevelopment program" (the "Voluntary Program") requiring specified
substantial annual contributions to local school and special districts. If all
RDAs were to opt -in to the Voluntary Program, these contributions would
amount to $1.7 Billion for FY 2011-2012 and appear intended to amount to
$400 Million in each succeeding year (subject to certain adjustments
described below).
' The Governor signed the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts before midnight on June 28. The Redevelopment
Restructuring Acts were chaptered by the Secretary State on June 29 as Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of the 2011-2012
First Extraordinary Session. On June 30 the Governor signed the main budget bill (SB 87) and certain other budget
trailer bills acted upon by the Legislature. Under these circumstances, there is uncertainty among legal experts as to
whether the effective date of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts is the date the Governor signed the acts (June
28) or the date the Governor signed the main budget bill to which the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts are related
trailer bills (June 30). It is the view of the California Redevelopment Association that the Redevelopment
Restructuring Acts became effective on the date the Governor signed the main budget bill.
Z It is highly questionable under the 'contract clauses" of the Federal and State constitutions whether the Dissolution
Act could be retroactive to 12:01 a.m. of its effective date, thereby purporting to render invalid contracts entered into
by a RDA earlier in the day on which the Dissolution Act becomes effective.
193
990051\1\999994.4
Following this Part A overview, this summary describes the Dissolution Act (Part
B) and the Voluntary Program Act (Part C), and concludes with a schedule of key
dates set forth in the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts (Part D).
II. Potential Litigation
The California Redevelopment Association ("CRA") and the League of California
Cities (the "League") have strongly indicated their intent to challenge in court the
validity and constitutionality of the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts on
numerous grounds, including that the acts violate the following provisions of the
California Constitution:
• Article XIIIA, Section 25.5 , which prohibits city or county property tax
from being used for schools;
• Article XIIIA, Section 1, which prohibits the transfer of property tax to
transit districts;
o Article XIII, Section 24, which prohibits the Legislature from restricting the
use of taxes imposed by local governments for their local purposes;
• Article XIIIA, Section 25.5, which prohibits indirect allocation of tax
increment to schools, transit districts and fire protection districts;
e Article XVI, Section 6, which prohibits the transfer of city or county
revenues to schools and transit districts and fire protection districts as an
unlawful gift of public funds;
• Article XIIIB, which prohibits the use of property tax to fund state
mandates;
• Article XVI, Section 16, which requires all tax increment to be used to repay
indebtedness incurred by the redevelopment agency to carry out its
redevelopment projects; and
• Article XIIIA, Section 25.5, which prohibits city and county property tax
from being transferred to special districts without a 2/3 vote.
11 •'
990051\1\999994.4
CRA and the League will petition to have their lawsuit heard initially by the
California Supreme Court to accelerate the ultimate court decision, and to seek a
court "stay" or injunction to prevent the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts from
being operative pending the final court decision on the merits of the lawsuit.
Goldfarb & Lipman will monitor and provide client advice regarding the major
steps in this anticipated litigation.
Given the complexity and magnitude of impact of the Redevelopment
Restructuring Acts, it is also highly likely that these acts will engender litigation
from individual RDAs regarding the constitutionality and applicability of various
provisions of the acts to the litigating RDA's individual situation.
III. Additional Potential Redevelopment Legislation
The Voluntary Program Act itself states the legislative intent to enact legislation
later in the current legislative session to address the RDA special payment formula
for fiscal years after the FY 2011-2012 Budget, as described further below.
In addition, at the time of Senate passage, the President Pro Tern of the Senate
outlined a series of "clean-up" provisions to the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts
that he intends to pursue later in the 2011 legislative session, including:
e Provide mechanisms for RDAs that would not otherwise be able to opt -in to
the Voluntary Program to avoid dissolution by spreading their FY 2011-12
payments over multiple years;
• Provide for redevelopment plan time extensions for RDAs that opt -in to the
Voluntary Program to partially offset the financial impact of the Voluntary
Program;
• Require RDAs to repay any Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds used
to make payments under the Voluntary Program; and
• Focus eligible expenditures of RDA funds to projects that encourage infill
development and improve the jobs/housing balance.
Other potential clean-up provisions have also come to light during our review of
the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, some of which are noted in the following
analysis.
195
990051\1\999994A
Finally, separate from the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts, but also important to
the future of California Redevelopment for those RDAs that opt -in to the
Voluntary Program and continue to operate, the following key bills have been
introduced in the 2011 legislative session:
• SB 450 (Lowenthal), which would enact major reforms to the affordable
housing provisions of the CRL;3 and
SB 286 (Wright) and AB 1250 (Alejo), similar legislation that would
address major CRL reforms related to non -housing redevelopment activities
and the adoption of future redevelopment plans.4
Goldfarb & Lipman will continue to carefully monitor and provide timely
information regarding the progress of these various legislative actions that could
affect the CRL for RDAs that choose to opt -in to continued existence under the
Voluntary Program.
' SB 450 was passed out of the Senate on June 2, 2011 by a 39-0 vote. SB 450 was passed out of the Assembly
Committee on Housing and Community Development on June 29, 2011 by a 7-0 vote and has been sent to the
Assembly Committee on Appropriations.
4 SB 286 is being held in the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance and AB 1250 has been sent to the
Assembly Committee on Rules.
4196.
990051\1\999994.4
PART B. DISSOLUTION ACT
I. Introduction
As detailed in this Part B, the Dissolution Act:
• Immediately suspends and prohibits most redevelopment activities;5
• Dissolves RDAs as of October 1, 2011 (unless a RDA opts into continued
existence under the Voluntary Program);
• Creates successor agencies ("Successor Agency" or "Successor Agencies")
and oversight boards ("Oversight Board" or "Oversight Boards") to continue
to satisfy enforceable obligations of a former RDA, and administer the
dissolution and wind down of each dissolved RDA; and
Establishes roles for the County -Auditor Controller, the Department of
Finance and the State Controller's Office in the dissolution process and
satisfaction of enforceable obligations of former RDAs.
II. Suspension of RDA Activities and Preservation
of RDA Assets and Revenues
Upon effectiveness of the Dissolution Act, a RDA is generally no longer
authorized to:
• Incur new indebtedness or other obligations or restructure existing
indebtedness and other obligations;
• Make loans or grants;
• Enter into contracts;
• Amend existing agreements, obligations or commitments;
• Renew or extend leases or other agreements;
This suspension will become permanent on the dissolution date of October 1, 2011 for RDAs not participating in
the Voluntary Program, and will be lifted for RDAs that opt -in to continued existence under the Voluntary Program
upon enactment of the Sponsoring Community's opt -in ordinance (see Part C.1). See also footnotes 1 and 2.
197
990051\1\999994.4
• Transfer funds out of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund;
• Dispose of or transfer assets;
• Acquire real property in most circumstances;
• Prepare, adopt, amend or merge redevelopment plans;
• Approve any program, project or expenditure;
• Prepare or amend implementation plans, relocation plans or other
planning documents;
• Cause development or rehabilitation of housing units;
• Join a joint powers authority;
• Form or join a separate legal entity;
• Bring a validation action in connection with issuance of revenue bonds;
• Commence an eminent domain proceeding;
• Prepare a draft EIR;
• Undertake various affordable housing activities;
• Accept financial assistance; or
• Increase employee compensation, bonuses or number of RDA employees
and officials.
According to the Dissolution Act, this suspension and prohibition of most
redevelopment activities is intended, to the maximum extent possible, to preserve
the revenues and assets of RDAs so that those assets and revenues that are not
needed to pay for enforceable obligations may be used by local governments to
fund core governmental services including police and fire protection services and
schools.
Oj
990051\1\999994.4
III. Permitted and Required RDA Activities Prior to Dissolution
Until October 1, 2011 (when RDAs are dissolved unless they opt -in to continued
existence under the Voluntary Program), a RDA is authorized to:
• Make scheduled payments on and perform obligations required under its
"Enforceable Obligations,"' which include:
o Bonds;
o Loans borrowed by a RDA;
o Payments required by federal or state government or for employee
pension obligations;
o Judgments or settlements;
o "Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract that is not
otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public policy"; and
o Contracts for administration or operation of the RDA.
• Set aside reserves as required for bonds;
• Preserve all assets and records and minimize RDA obligations and
liabilities;
• Cooperate with its Successor Agency and auditing entities (as described
below); and
• Avoid triggering defaults under Enforceable Obligations.
In addition, during this suspension period the Dissolution Act requires each RDA
to:
• Prepare an Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule setting forth
specified information about the RDA's Enforceable Obligations;
• Adopt the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule at a public meeting;
• Post the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule on the RDA's or its
Sponsoring Community's website;
e With a minor exception that may be a drafting error, "Enforceable Obligations" are defined in the same way
during the suspension period described in this section as during the post -dissolution period discussed in succeeding
sections.
7 199
990051\1\999994 4
• Transmit the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule by mail or
electronic means to the County Auditor -Controller, the State Controller
and the Department of Finance;
• Designate an RDA official to whom the department may make
information requests;
• Prepare a preliminary draft of the initial Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule and deliver the such schedule to the Successor Agency; and
• Produce documents associated with Enforceable Obligations upon
request of the State Controller or Department of Finance.
The Department of Finance may review a RDA action or Successor Agency action
pursuant to an Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule or a Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule, and such actions will not be effective for three
business days, pending a request for review by the department. If the department
requests a review of a given RDA action, the department shall have ten days from
the date of its request to approve the RDA action or return it to the RDA for
reconsideration.9
IV. Treatment of Agreements between a RDA and its Sponsoring
Community or Other Public Agency/Public Entity
With limited exceptions, the Dissolution Act expressly states that Enforceable
Obligations to be paid by Successor Agencies do not include agreements, contracts
or arrangements between a RDA and the city, the county or the city and county
that created the RDA (the "Sponsoring Community"), and that such agreements,
contracts or arrangements are invalid and not binding on Successor Agencies.
These provisions do not apply to the following agreements, which may be deemed
Enforceable Obligations and binding upon Successor Agencies:
' Notification providing the Website location of the Payment Schedule will suffice to meet this requirement.
' It is unclear whether the reference in the Dissolution Act to the "department" is intended to refer to the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (which is the normal meaning of that term in the CRL) or,
more likely, to the Department of Finance which is the department to which responsibilities are given under the
Dissolution Act.
9 It appears difficult to reconcile the Dissolution Act's requirement that RDAs continue to pay scheduled
Enforceable Obligations with the provision that payments under a Payment Schedule are not effective for 3 business
days.
99005 N \999994.4
g 200
A duly authorized written agreement entered into at the time of issuance, but
in no event later than December 31, 2010, of bonds, notes, certificates of
participation or other similar indebtedness, and solely for the purpose of
securing or repaying such indebtedness;
• A written agreement between a RDA and its Sponsoring Community that
provided loans or other startup funds for the RDA that was entered into
within two years of the formation of the RDA; or
• A joint exercise of powers agreement in which the RDA is a member of the
joint powers authority.10
Beginning upon effectiveness of the Dissolution Act, the State Controller is
directed to review,RDA activities and determine whether an asset transfer has
occurred after January 1, 2011 between the RDA and its Sponsoring Community or
other public agency.
If the State Controller determines that such an asset transfer did occur and the
recipient has not contractually committed such assets to a third party to expend or
otherwise encumber those assets, such assets will be ordered returned to the RDA
or Successor Agency for payment of recognized obligations or distribution as
property taxes.
In any instance where the Oversight Board has found that early termination would
be in the best interest of the taxing entities, the Dissolution Act directs Oversight
Boards to ensure that Successor Agencies terminate any agreement between the
former RDA and any local public entity within the same county that obligates the
former RDA to provide funding for debt service obligations of such local public
entity or for the construction or operation of facilities owned or operated by such
local public entity.
10 However, upon assignment to the Successor Agency by operation of the Dissolution Act, the Successor Agency's
rights, duties and performance obligations under that joint exercise of powers agreement will be limited by the
constraints imposed on Successor Agencies by the Dissolution Act.
.1 9 201
990051\1\999994.4
V. Dissolution of RDAs/Creation of Successor Agencies
For each RDA that has not opted in to the Voluntary Program, under the
Dissolution Act, as of October 1, 2011:
• The RDA will be dissolved; and
• A Successor Agency will be created for each RDA.
The Successor Agency will be the Sponsoring Community of the RDA unless it
elects not to serve in that capacity. In that case, the Successor Agency will be the
first taxing entity submitting to the County Auditor -Controller a duly adopted
resolution electing to become the Successor Agency.
The actions of the Successor Agency will be monitored, and in some cases
approved, by the Oversight Board as described in Section VIII below.
All assets, properties, contracts, leases, records, buildings and equipment of former
RDAs would be transferred to the control of the Successor Agency, except as
described in Section VII below for affordable housing assets.
VI. Transfer of Housing Functions of Former RDA
The Sponsoring Community may elect to assume the housing functions and take
over the housing assets of the former RDA, excluding amounts in the former
RDA's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund,11 along with related rights,
powers, liabilities, duties and obligations.12
If the Sponsoring Community does not elect to assume the former RDA's housing
functions, such housing functions and all related assets would be transferred to the
local Housing Authority (or Department of Housing and Community
Development, if there is no local Housing Authority).
The entity that assumes the housing functions of former RDA will be able to use its
inherent powers (not limited by the Dissolution Act's restrictions on Successor
" Clean up legislation has been proposed, but not yet introduced, to reverse this provision so that existing Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund deposits would be transferred to the Sponsoring Community (as was the case in the
predecessor bill to the Dissolution Act).
12 However, in what is believed to be inadvertent drafting, the Dissolution Act makes it less clear how the former
RDA's housing assets, such as property, would be transferred.
N ,0 202
990051\1\999994.4
Agencies) to fulfill housing obligations and will be able to exercise Redevelopment
Law housing powers to fulfill such obligations.
The Dissolution Act requires Successor Agencies to repay amounts previously
borrowed from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (i.e. to make SERAF
payments in prior years), repayment of which had been deferred as of the effective
date. These repaid funds would presumably be paid to the entity that assumes the
housing functions of the former RDA.
The Dissolution Act requires Oversight Boards to direct Successor Agencies to list
amounts owed to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund on the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule.
VII. Role of Successor Agencies
The Dissolution Act requires a Successor Agency to perform the following
functions.
A Successor Agency is required to make payments and perform other obligations
due for Enforceable Obligations13 of the former RDA, which include:
• Bonds;
• Loans borrowed by the RDA (including amounts borrowed in past years
from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund);
• Payments required by federal or state government or for employee
pension obligations;
• Judgments or settlements; and
"Any legally binding and enforceable agreement or contract14 that is not
otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public. policy" (at Oversight
Board direction, a Successor Agency may terminate existing agreements
and pay required compensation or remediation for such termination).
" With a minor exception that appears to be a drafting error, "Enforceable Obligations" are defined in the same way
during the post -dissolution period described in this section as during the suspension period discussed in Section III
above.
1° See Section IV above regarding the exception that most contracts between a former RDA and its Sponsoring
Community will be void and will not constitute an Enforceable Obligation.
"i> 203
990051\1\999994.4
To facilitate this payment of Enforceable Obligations, a Successor Agency is
required to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for each six month
period of each fiscal year, including identifying the funding source for all
Enforceable Obligations of the former RDA.
A Successor Agency is required to dispose of the former RDA's assets or
properties expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing value (proceeds to
be distributed similar to normal property tax proceeds)."
A Successor Agency is required to effectuate the transfer of housing functions of
the former RDA to its Sponsoring Community (or applicable Housing Authority or
the Department of Housing and Community Development).
A Successor Agency is required to wind up all other affairs of the former RDA.
A Successor Agency is required to prepare administrative budgets for Oversight
Board approval and pay administrative costs. Subject to the approval of the
Oversight Board, the Successor Agency's annual administrative costs will be an
amount up to five percent of the property tax allocated to the Successor Agency for
FY 2011-12 and up to three percent of the property tax allocated to the Successor
Agency each succeeding fiscal year; provided, however, that the annual amount
shall not be less than $250,000 for any fiscal year (or such lesser amount as agreed
to by the Successor Agency).
15 The Oversight Board may direct the Successor Agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed
and used for a governmental purpose to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements
related to the construction or use of such asset.
12
204
99005 1 \1\999994.4
VIII. Oversight Boards
An Oversight Board is generally intended to supervise the activities of the
Successor Agency. The Oversight Board has a fiduciary responsibility to holders
of Enforceable Obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of
property tax and other revenues as described in Section X below.
The Oversight Board of the Successor Agency will consist of 7 members appointed
by/representing:16 17
• County Board of Supervisors (two members);
• Mayor (one member);
• County Superintendent of Education (one member);
• Chancellor of California Community Colleges (one member);
• Largest special district taxing entity (one member); and
A former RDA employee appointed by Mayor/Board of Supervisors (one
member).
The Dissolution Act requires the Oversight Board to direct the Successor Agency
to determine whether contracts, agreements or other arrangements between the
former RDA and private parties should be terminated or renegotiated to reduce the
Successor Agency's liabilities and to increase net revenues to the taxing entities.
The actions of the Oversight Board of each Successor Agency will in turn be
overseen by the Director of the Department of Finance and may be subject to
disapproval or modification.
Oversight Board actions will not be effective for three business days pending a
request for review by the Department of Finance. If the department requests a
review of a given Oversight Board action, the department shall have ten days from
the date of its request to approve the Oversight Board action or return it to the
" Different rules apply for the composition of the Oversight Board for the former RDA of a city and county (i.e., the,
City and County of San Francisco).
" Commencing July I, 2016, all of the Oversight Boards for the various former RDAs in a particular county will be
consolidated into a single county -wide Oversight Board of specified composition.
205
13
990051\1\999994.4
Oversight Board for reconsideration. The Oversight Board has specified
obligations with respect to maintaining a Website and providing specified
notification to various state officials.
IX. Role of County Auditor -Controller
The Dissolution Act requires the County Auditor -Controller to:
By March 1, 2012, conduct an audit of former RDA assets and liabilities,
including pass -through payment obligations and the amount and terms of
any RDA indebtedness, and provide the State Controller's Office with a
copy of such audit by March 15, 2012;
• Annually determine the amount of property tax increment that would
have been allocated to the RDA and deposit that amount in a
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (the "Trust Fund"); and
Administer the Trust Fund for the benefit of holders of former RDA debt,
taxing entities that receive pass -through payments and distributions of
property taxes, as described in Section X below.
Actions of the County Auditor -Controller will not be effective for three business
days pending a request for review by the State Controller. If the department
requests a review of a given County Auditor -Controller action, the department will
have ten days from the date of its request to approve the County Auditor -Controller
action or return it to the County Auditor -Controller for reconsideration.
X. Payments from Trust Fund
The Dissolution Act requires the County Auditor -Controller to allocate moneys in
the Trust Fund established for each former RDA as follows:
To pay pass -through payments to affected taxing entities in the amounts
that would have been owed had the former RDA not been dissolved;
e To the Successor Agency to enable the Successor Agency to pay
Enforceable Obligations of the former RDA, including bonds;
To the Successor Agency to pay for administrative costs under the
administrative budget approved by the Oversight Board; and
14
206
99005 1 \1\999994.4
Any remaining balance in the Trust Fund, to school entities and other
local taxing entities as property taxes.
If a Successor Agency determines, and the County Auditor -Controller and the
State Controller verify, that the Successor Agency will not have sufficient funds to
pay all amounts above, then the deficiencies shall be deducted in the following
order from the Trust Fund payments to:
• School entities and local agencies (as normal property taxes);
• Administrative costs of the Successor Agency;
• Pass -through payments to school entities and local entities that have been
subordinated to the payment of Enforceable Obligations;
• Enforceable Obligations payable by the Successor Agency; and
• Non -subordinated pass -through payments to school entities and local
entities.
The Dissolution Act allows statutory pass -through payments received by school
districts, community college districts and offices of education between FY 2011-
2012 and FY 2015-2016 to be used for land acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, remodeling, maintenance or deferred maintenance of educational
facilities.
15
207
99005 h 1 \999994.4
XI. Miscellaneous
The Dissolution Act clarifies that community development commissions may
continue their housing authority and other local community development functions
(other than redevelopment) unaffected by the Act.
The Dissolution Act provides that a former RDA's obligations to its employees
pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement become Enforceable Obligations of
the Successor Agency. An employee's civil service status and classification remain
the same for a minimum of two years.
The Dissolution Act includes a provision lengthening the period to challenge RDA
actions taken after January 1, 2011 from ninety days to two years.
The Dissolution Act requires that any action contesting the validity of portions of
the Dissolution Act or challenging acts taken pursuant to the Dissolution Act be
brought in the Sacramento County Superior Court.
If any legal challenge to invalidate a provision of the Dissolution Act is successful,
a RDA shall be prohibited from issuing new bonds, notes, interim certificates,
debentures or other obligations, whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise
pursuant to the financing provisions of the CRL.
The Dissolution Act appropriates $500,000 to the Department of Finance for
allocation to the State Controller, State Treasurer and Director of Finance to
undertake the duties listed above.
If a RDA is dissolved pursuant to the Dissolution Act, the Sponsoring Community
may not establish a new RDA until all debts of the dissolved RDA have been
retired by the applicable Successor Agency, and the Sponsoring Community has
enacted an ordinance agreeing to make the payments required under the Voluntary
Program.
16
wool
1
990051\1\999994.4
PART C. ALTERNATIVE VOLUNTARY
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ACT
I. "Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program" Opt -In
To avoid being dissolved and to lift the suspension of new redevelopment activities
and indebtedness under the Dissolution Act, a RDA and its Sponsoring
Community may elect to continue operating under the current CRL if they make
specified substantial payments ("Remittances") to their County Auditor -Controller
beginning in FY 2011-2012 and in all succeeding years the RDA's redevelopment
program continues to operate.
To avoid dissolution, by November 1, 2011, the RDA's Sponsoring Community
must enact an ordinance in which it agrees to comply with the Voluntary Program
by making the Remittances and must notify the Department of Finance, the State
Controller and the County Auditor -Controller of its agreement to comply with the
Voluntary Program.
If the Sponsoring Community does not enact such an ordinance before October 1,
2011, but intends to do so by November 1, it must, prior to October 1, indicate that
intention by adopting a non -binding resolution of intent and notifying the
Department of Finance, the State Controller and the County Auditor -Controller.
Once a Sponsoring Community enacts the appropriate opt -in ordinance, its RDA
will no longer be subject to the provisions of the Dissolution Act and may
immediately recommence normal redevelopment activities under the CRL, such as
entering into contracts, disposing of assets and incurring new indebtedness and
obligations.18
II. Sources and Uses of Remittances
The Remittances are technically required to be made by a RDA's Sponsoring
Community on behalf of the RDA. Remittances may be made from any available
funds of the Sponsoring Community, including funds made available by its RDA,
as follows:
e A RDA and its Sponsoring Community may enter into an agreement
whereby the RDA transfers. a portion of its tax increment to the
Sponsoring Community in an amount not -to -exceed the required annual
18 if the Sponsoring Community subsequently fails to make a required Remittance, its RDA will then become
subject to the Dissolution Act again and will be dissolved (see Section VI. below). 209
17
990051\1\999994.4
Remittance for the purpose of financing activities within a redevelopment
area that are related to accomplishing the RDA's project goals;19
For FY 2011-2012 only, a RDA will be exempt from making its full
deposit into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (and not
required to repay unmade deposits 20), but only to the extent that it makes
a finding that there are insufficient other monies to meets its debt and
other obligations, current priority program needs or its obligations to
reimburse the Sponsoring Community for that year's Remittance;
• The Remittances payable by a Sponsoring Community and its RDA
participating in the Voluntary Program are due in equal installments each
fiscal year by January 15 and May 15; and
By November 1 of each year commencing in 2012, a Sponsoring
Community must notify the Department of Finance, the State Controller
and the County Auditor -Controller of the Remittance amount for the
applicable fiscal year. Those entities may audit and verify the
Remittance amount, and if it is determined that a Sponsoring Community
has miscalculated the Remittance amount, the next Remittance amount
will be adjusted accordingly. County Auditor -Controller costs for
overseeing this process are subject to reimbursement by the Sponsoring
Community.
Remittances received by the County Auditor -Controller from a participating
RDA/Sponsoring Community are to be distributed as follows:
o Through a special district allocation fund, a minor portion of FY 2011-
2012 Remittances (and thereafter 15% of annual Remittances) would be
distributed to special districts that provide fire protection services to the
participating RDA's project area(s) and transit districts that serve the
participating RDA's project area(s); and
19 The Voluntary Program Act does not provide an exemption for amounts paid by a RDA towards Remittances
against any dollar cap limitations on the participating RDA's receipt of tax increment.
20 See Part A.11 regarding the President Pro Tem of the Senate's intention to require RDAs to repay any Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund proceeds used to make payments under the Voluntary Program. 210
18
990051\1\999994.4
Through the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund, the balance of all
Remittances would be distributed to school entities21 that serve the
participating RDA's project area(s).
III. Calculation of FY 2011-2012 Remittances
The Voluntary Program Act is designed to generate $1.7 Billion for FY 2011-2012
if every Sponsoring Community/RDA agrees to participate in the Voluntary
Program.
The formula for calculating each Sponsoring Community/RDA's FY 2011-2012
Remittance is similar, but not identical, to the formula used to calculate each
RDA's share of the statewide $1.7 Billion Special Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund ("SERAF") obligations in FY 2009-2010.
For FY 2011-20.12, the Voluntary Program Act formula works as follows:
• First, each participating RDA's share of statewide net tax increment22
revenue for FY 2008-2009 is determined and multiplied by $1.7 Billion
(the "Net Tax Increment Share");
Second, each participating RDA's share of statewide gross tax increment
for FY 2008-2009 is determined and multiplied by $1.7 Billion (the
"Gross Tax Increment Share"); and
e Third, each participating RDA's Net Tax Increment Share and Gross Tax
Increment Share are averaged to determine the Sponsoring
Community/RDA's Remittance for FY 2011-2012.
By August 1, 2011 the Department of Finance is directed to specify the required
Remittance amount for FY 2011-2012 to each Sponsoring Community and the
County Auditor -Controller. The Sponsoring Community may appeal the amount
of the Remittance to the Director of Finance by August 15, 2011 on the basis that
the information in the FY 2008-2009 State Controller's Annual Report was an
error or the percentage of tax increment necessary to pay for tax allocation bonds
2' For FY 2011-2012, such Remittances would count against the State's Proposition 98 obligations (thereby
providing State general fund relief), but for FY 2012-2013 and beyond, such Remittances would not count against
the State's Proposition 98 obligations.
22 Net tax increment means the RDA's gross tax increment less various forms of pass -through payments and
required debt service payments in FY 2008-2009 (the SERAF formula did not net -out debt service payments for this
portion of the formula).
19 211
990051\1\999994.4
and interest payments have increased by 10 percent or more over the percentage
calculated pursuant to the State Controller's FY 2008-2009 Annual Report. The
Voluntary Program Act then provides for the Director of the Department of
Finance to resolve such appeals by a specified date.
IV. Calculation of FY 2012-2013 Remittances
The Voluntary Program Act appears to be designed to generate $400 Million if
every Sponsoring Community/RDA agreed to participate in the Voluntary
Program. However, the FY 2012-2013 formula is complex and appears to be
incorrectly drafted, thereby requiring a certain degree of good -faith interpretation.
The formula may be intended to require an RDA to increase its Remittance to
account for the State budget impact of having to backfill foregone school entity
property taxes attributable to new non -housing RDA obligations or indebtedness
incurred on or after November 1, 2011.
For FY 2012-2013, each participating Sponsoring Community/RDA must make a
Remittance equal to the sum of the following two amounts:
• Amount 1 equals the Sponsoring Community/RDA's:
(FY 2011-2012 Remittance amount) x (23.52%23) x (FY2012-2013 Adjusted Tax Increment)
(FY2011-2012 Year Adjusted Tax Increment).
For the purpose of calculating Amount 1,
"Adjusted Tax Increment" for a given fiscal year means the RDA's total tax
increment minus the amount of debt service or other payments for new non -
housing fund payable debtor obligations incurred by the RDA on or after
November 1, 2011.
• Amount 2 equals:
(Net School Share) x (New Debt Service) x (Percentage Factor)
For the purposes of calculating Amount 2,
"Net School Share" means the school entities' (defined as "school districts,
community college districts, the educational revenue augmentation fund, and
23 This percentage reflects the ratio of $400 Million to $1.7 Billion.
20 12
990051\1\999994.4
county superintendents of schools") "share of the property tax increment revenues,
less any pass -through payments to school entities, that would have been received
by the school entities in the absence of redevelopment";24
"New Debt Service" means the debt service or other payments made by the
RDA in FY 2012-2013 for new non -housing fund payable debt or obligations that
are displayed on a RDA's statement of indebtedness for the first time after the
statement of indebtedness filed on October 1, 2011;25 and
"Percentage Factor" means 80%, or such lesser percentage as may be
determined by subsequent legislation, it being the stated intent of the legislature
under the Voluntary Program Act to enact legislation setting forth reduced
percentages that will apply to bonds issued for the purpose of funding projects that
advance the achievement of statewide goals with respect to transportation, housing,
economic development and job creation, environmental protection and remediation
and climate change, including, projects that are consistent with the Sustainable
Communities Strategies developed pursuant to SB 375.
These definitions also apply to Amount 2 for Remittances for FY 2013-2014 and
beyond; see Section V below.
V. Calculation of Remittances for FY 2013-2014 and Beyond
For FY 2013-2014 and beyond, each participating Sponsoring Community/RDA
must make a Remittance equal to the sum of the following two amounts (terms
used below have the same meaning as defined in Section IV above):
• Amount 1 equals the sponsoring community/RDA's:
(Remittance amount for the previous fiscal year) x (Current Fiscal Year Adjusted Tax Increment)
(Previous Fiscal Year Adjusted Tax Increment)
• Amount 2 equals:
(Net school share) x (New Debt Service) x (Percentage Factor)
Z" This definition appears to combine concepts of percentage shares and absolute dollar amounts in a technically
incompatible fashion, and would benefit from clarification through clean-up legislation.
" This definition appears to be inconsistent with the operative provision regarding the Amount 2 payment in the
preceding sentence of the Voluntary Program Act, which refers to "debt or obligations issued or incurred on or after
November 2, 201 L" Clarification of this apparent inconsistency would be appropriate.
21 213
99005 N \999994.4
VI. Sanctions for Failure to Make Remittances
If a Sponsoring Community/RDA fails to make a Remittance, the RDA will
become subject to the Dissolution Act and will be dissolved. In addition, by
participating in the Voluntary Program, the Sponsoring Community agrees that,
upon failure to make a timely Remittance, any agreement between the Sponsoring
Community and its RDA to receive RDA funds will be assigned to the State. As a
result, upon a failure to make a timely Remittance, amounts that the Sponsoring
Community might otherwise have received under an agreement with its RDA will
then become payable to the State for purposes of mitigating the fiscal impact to the
State related to the failure of a Sponsoring Community to make required
Remittances.
Any new debts incurred by the RDA or obligations entered into by the RDA on or
after January 1 of the calendar year preceding the year the Sponsoring
Community/RDA fails to make a Remittance would be subject to the same
limitations and sanctions set forth in the Dissolution Act.
VII. Miscellaneous
If any legal challenge to invalidate a provision of the Voluntary Program Act is
successful, a RDA shall be prohibited from issuing new bonds, notes, interim
certificates, debentures or other obligations, whether funded, refunded, assumed or
otherwise pursuant to the financing provisions of the Community Redevelopment
Law.
If a RDA is dissolved pursuant to the Dissolution Act, the Sponsoring Community
may not establish a new RDA until all debts of the dissolved RDA have been
retired by the applicable Successor Agency, and the Sponsoring Community has
enacted an ordinance agreeing to make the Remittances required under the
Voluntary Program.
22
214
99005 1 \1 \999994.4
PART D. KEY MILESTONES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
OF REDEVELOPMENT RESTRUCTURING ACTS
I. Milestones Related To Voluntary Program Act
• By August 1, 2011: Department of Finance ("DOF") notifies Sponsoring
Community of 2011-2012 Remittance amount.
• By August 15, 2011: Sponsoring Community may appeal the amount of
2011-2012 Remittance to DOF director.
• By September 15, 2011: DOF director notifies Sponsoring Community and
County Auditor -Controller of the decision on the appeal, unless director
extends deadline to October 15, 2011.
• Before October 1, 2011: Sponsoring Community adopts a non -binding
resolution of intent to opt -in to Voluntary Program if unable to adopt
ordinance to that effect by October 1, 2011, and notifies DOF, State
Controller and County Auditor -Controller of adoption of resolution. This
action delays the dissolution of a RDA until November 1, 2011.
• November 1, 2011: Sponsoring Community enacts ordinance to opt -in to
Voluntary Program, and notifies DOF, State Controller and County Auditor -
Controller of adoption of ordinance. (December 1, 2011 if DOF director has
extended time for decision of appeal of Remittance amount.)
Commencing January 15, 2012 and May 15, 2012 and every January 15 and
May 15 thereafter, the Sponsoring Community shall pay one-half of the
Remittance amount for the applicable year. County Auditor -Controller
notifies the DOF director of any failure to make the payment within 30 days
of due date.
November 1, 2012 and each November 1 thereafter, Sponsoring Community
notifies DOF, State Controller and County Auditor -Controller of Remittance
amounts for each fiscal year.
II. Milestones Related to Dissolution Act
Upon effectiveness of the Dissolution Act: State Controller commences
review of RDA asset transfers after January 1, 2011.
23
215
990051\1\999994.4
• Upon effectiveness of the Dissolution Act: Redevelopment activities
suspended except for limited specified activities.
• No specified date: State Controller may order the assets improperly
transferred by a RDA to its Sponsoring Community after January 1 to be
returned to the RDA (or to its Successor Agency).
e No specified date: RDA informs DOF of a designated contact person and
related contact information for the purpose of communicating with the DOF.
• In August 2011: Sponsoring Community decides whether to serve as a
Successor Agency by resolution.
• Within 60 days after effectiveness of the Dissolution Act: Agency adopts at
public meeting an Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule for obligations
through December 1, 2011. Posts schedule on website and delivers it to
DOF, State Controller and County Auditor -Controller.
• September 1, 2011: Sponsoring Community that elects not to serve as a
Successor Agency files a copy of resolution to that effect with the County
Auditor -Controller.
• No later than September 30, 2011: RDA prepares a preliminary draft of the
initial Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and provides it to the
Successor Agency.
• September 30, 2011: The existing terms of any memorandum of
understanding with an employee organization expires, unless a new
agreement is reached with a recognized employee organization prior to that
date.
• No specified date but prior to October 1, 2011: Sponsoring Community
decides whether to serve as successor housing entity by resolution.
• October 1, 2011: RDA is dissolved if its Sponsoring Community has not
enacted an ordinance opting in to Voluntary Program. (November 1, 2011 if
Sponsoring Community adopted non -binding resolution of intent before
October 1, 2011.)
• October 1, 2011: Successor Agency created.
216
24
99005 1 \1 \999994.4
• October 1, 2011: RDA agreements with Sponsoring Community void (with
limited exceptions).
October 1, 2011: All dissolved RDA assets (including properties, contracts,
leases, books and records, buildings and equipment), except housing assets,
transferred to Successor Agency. RDA delivers Enforceable Obligation
Payment Schedule to Successor Agency. Transfer of RDA housing assets
(excluding existing Housing Fund balances) to successor housing entity.
• On and after October 1, 2011: Successor Agencies permitted to make
payments only as listed on Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule.
• From October 1, 2011 to July 1, 2012: Successor Agency prohibited from
accelerating payments or making any lump sum payments that are intended
to prepay loans unless such accelerated repayments were required prior to
October 1, 2011.
• By November 1, 2011: Successor Agency prepares initial draft of
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the Enforceable Obligations
of the former RDA, subject to review and certification by external auditor as
to accuracy.
• No later than December 1, 2011 and May 1, 2012, and each December 1 and
May 1 thereafter: Successor Agency reports to the County Auditor -State
Controller if the total amount available to the Successor Agency is
insufficient to fund the specified payments in the next six-month fiscal
period. County Auditor -Controller notifies State Controller and DOF no
later than 10 days from the date of that notification from the Successor
Agency.
• December 15, 2011: Successor Agency submits first Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule to State Controller and DOF for the period of January 1,
2012 to June 30, 2012. Successor Agency prepares new Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule for each six month period thereafter for
approval by Oversight Board. Approved Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedules are posted on Successor Agency website and submitted to DOF, .
Controller and County Auditor -Controller.
• Commencing on January 1, 2012: Successor Agency may pay only those
payments listed in the approved Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
Statements of Indebtedness are no longer recognized for dissolved RDAs. • 217
25
990051\1\999994.4
• By January 1, 2012: Oversight Board elects and reports name of chairperson
and other members to DOF.
• No specified date but after formation of Oversight Board: Each Oversight
Board informs DOF of a designated contact person and related contact
information for the purpose of communicating with DOF.
• January 15, 2012: Governor appoints persons to unfilled positions on
Oversight Board (or any member position that remains vacant for more than
60 days).
• No later than January 16, 2012 and June 1, 2012, and each January 16 and
June 1 thereafter: County Auditor -Controller transfers from the
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund of each Successor Agency into the
Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund of that Successor Agency, an
amount of property tax revenues equal to that specified in the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule. Successor Agency makes payments on listed
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule from those funds.
• By March 1, 2012: County Auditor -Controller completes audit of each
dissolved RDA.
e By March 15, 2012: County Auditor -Controller provides the State
Controller copy of all audits performed on dissolved RDAs.
• By October 1, 2012: County Auditor -Controller reports specified financial
information to the Controller and DOF.
• January 1, 2013: California Law Revision Commission drafts a Community
Redevelopment Law cleanup bill for consideration by the Legislature.
• July 1, 2016: Consolidation of all Oversight Boards into one county -wide
Oversight board in each county where more than one Oversight Board was
created.
• After July 15, 2016: Governor appoints persons to unfilled positions on
county -wide Oversight Board (or any member position that remains vacant
for more than 60 days).
26
218
99005 1 \1 \999994.4
Department Report: IA
Qum&
i
�N OF T
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Managerl�
L (
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Department Report - Response to Public Comment
The following public comment was made at the July 5, 2011 City Council meeting:
1. Jack Shannazarian, 45155 Sunberry Court, Boy Scout Troop 377 - Bermuda
Dunes, explained he is working on an Eagle Scout project to provide 150 school
supply kits for students at Las Palmitas Elementary School in Thermal. He
requested the City's support and donations.
Mayor Adolph and Council Member Henderson stated they would give the
information he provided to the organizations they are involved with for their
support. Council Member Evans stated JFK Hospital would be able to provide
150 plastic bags for the kits. Council Member Franklin suggested he contact La
Quinta Senior Center staff for additional assistance.
?I9
Department Report: 113
04
to Fib
�FM oe t9
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Thomas P. Genovese - City Manager
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Update on Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program
This report provides a quarterly update to La Quinta "green" activities for the
period April 2011 through June 2011.
City-wide Green Publicity, Projects, Outreach and Activities
The City of La Quinta served as a citrus collection site for Hidden Harvest's
expanded citrus recovery program. Hidden Harvest collects excess citrus to donate
to agencies that feed the hungry. The City's collection site for Hidden Harvest's
citrus recovery program collected 28,800 pounds for 2011. Rancho La Quinta also
donates citrus to Hidden Harvest and donated 77,800 pounds of citrus! The
Hidden Harvest citrus .recovery program has been a success and the City will
continue to be a citrus collections site in the future. The citrus recovery program
runs from January through April.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant
The City was allocated $180,700 in Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block
Grant (EECBG) funding focusing on energy efficiency retrofit measures for
municipal buildings, including City Hall, the Library, and Senior Center. City staff is
planning additional energy efficiency retrofits in this Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 using
EECBG funding. To date the City has spent $49,467.14.
220
Updates of Utility Programs
Partnership with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)
The City and the CVWD established a Water Waste Helpline (1-888-398-5008)
which is intended to allow individuals to report violations contributing to water
waste. City and CVWD personnel have been trained to ensure calls are responded
to in an efficient manner. The phone number for the helpline is also available on
the City's after-hours phone directory. As calls are received at CVWD, CVWD staff
members are dispatched to the location for follow-up. For after-hours calls and on
weekends, calls are responded to the following day or Monday. From April 2011
through June 2011, there were five calls related to broken spray heads, broken
sprinklers, leaking valves, and broken bubblers.
The City Municipal Code currently has a provision which prohibits allowing water,
including irrigation water, from flowing onto a right of way (street). This provision,
when combined with the CVWD/City Water Waste Helpline Program, helps to
reduce water waste.
The City and CVWD Cooperative Landscape Water Management Program continues
to provide La Quinta residents with incentives to replace their turf with drought
tolerant landscape. From April 2011 through June 2011, two homes and one
homeowners association (HOA) completed turf conversions. From April 2011
through June 2011, 22 Weather Based Irrigation Controllers (WBIC) were installed
in La Quinta homes.
Funding for the City/CVWD Weather Based Irrigation Clock Rebate Program
("Smart Controllers") is available for Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 thus allowing the
program to continue to be a successful program by producing substantial water
savings for La Quinta residents.
In addition, CVWD provided interactive, educational games at the La Quinta Day of
the Child event on April 16`h; an informational booth at the La Quinta Community
Picnic on April 301h; an information display at the La Quinta Home depot vendor fair
on May 14`h; and classroom presentations at Adams Elementary and Ben franklin
Elementary Schools.
Partnership with Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
III) Home Energy Audits continue to be a great way to assist La Quinta residents to
save on home energy costs providing no -cost and low-cost energy efficiency
recommendations to homeowners. From April 2011 through June 2011, there
were 32 audits conducted and 64 Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) bulbs were
provided resulting in 2,080 kWh potential annual energy savings. If the
homeowners were to implement the recommended energy retrofits, an additional
221
12,736 in kWh potential annual energy savings could be realized. In addition, IID
offers an Energy Star Rebate program. From April 2011 through June 2011, 83
rebates totaling $24,254 have been issued to La Quinta residents resulting in
50,289 kWh potential annual energy savings.
IID will be implementing a Small Business Direct Install Pilot Program (DI Program)
in La Quinta. IID and City staff will be meeting to discuss program implementation
and program goals and objectives. The DI targets small businesses with a monthly
energy demand of 100 kW or less, per customer; the operational costs reduction,
local job and small business retention, energy efficiency program awareness and
public perception improvements are some of the expected benefits. Program
objectives include:
• Recognize and address the conservation needs of a small business customer
• Improve competitiveness of small business customers through reduced energy
related costs
• Increase customer awareness of energy efficient business practices to include
improvements in operations and maintenance methods
The direct installation of the selected energy efficient measures (EEMs) will meet
IID's energy efficiency and demand reduction requirements. The program will
promote IID as a service provider and possibly serve as a link to other available
energy efficient programs. The IID will collaborate with the selected Contractor
regarding potential candidates and anticipates coordination with other public
agencies during the term of this program.
The Energy Efficiency Measures shall include:
• Lighting - fluorescent lighting, occupancy sensors, lighting timers, LED signs
(Open, Exit)
• Refrigeration - occupancy sensors for vending machines, door closures, door
gaskets, strip curtains, and LED lighting for reach in coolers
• Other - window film, appliance timers, programmable thermostats and other
cost-effective measures specific to the business operations
Partnership with Southern California Gas Company (Gas Company)
The City and Gas Company continue to meet to discuss new ideas for program
outreach. Gas Company staff has simplified and emphasized the programs and
incentives available to La Quinta residents by providing useful links. This
information may be found on the City's "Green" webpage. Please visit
http://www.la-quinta.org/index.aspx?page= 638 for additional information.
From April 2011 to June 2011, 40 rebates totaling $2,247 were paid to La Quinta
residents for storage water heaters, energy star dishwashers, energy star clothes
222
washers, high efficiency commercial fryers, and central gas furnaces through the
Energy Efficiency Rebate Program. In addition, 1,341 Therms (a unit of measure
for natural gas) were saved. That's equivalent to 7.3 metric tons of CO2; and
greenhouse gas emissions saved equivalent of removing 1.5 cars from the road and
natural gas savings equivalent of using natural gas for 2.6 homes.
Waste and Recycling
Staff continues to meet and work with Burrtec Waste and Recycling (Burrtec) and
Hilton, Farnkopf & Hobson (HF&H) Consulting with regard to waste and recycling
management services. Burrtec and HF&H have been cooperative and valuable
partners in providing City staff with waste management data and providing quality
customer service.
The Sharp's Program allows La Quinta residents to properly dispose of used
needles and syringes thereby protecting themselves, their families and the
community. The program is completely confidential and is FREE to La Quinta
residents. From April 2011 to June 2011, 40 "sharps" containers were received
from La Quinta residents for proper disposal.
On Saturday, April 9, 2011, a Used Oil/Filter Exchange Event was held at the City
of La Quinta AutoZone. During this event, La Quinta participants recycled 60%
more used oil filters than in the previous year (79 last year to 126 this year). The
filters recycled during the year at the La Quinta AutoZone store increased by 133%
which was the largest increases by any city in the Coachella Valley!
On Saturday, April 16, 2011 from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., the City, in partnership
with Burrtec Waste & Recycling Services and Best Buy, held a FREE Document
Shred Day to the residents and businesses of La Quinta. Participants were limited
to three file boxes per vehicle and over 85 vehicles filled a truck with over 2.6 tons
of material, resulting in over 30 pounds per vehicle. The next shred day event will
be held in October 2011.
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 at the City Hall parking lot, Riverside County Waste
Management and City of La Quinta held a FREE household hazardous waste (HHW)
collection event. There were 241 participants and over 9,800 pounds of household
hazardous waste (HHW) including, paint, fluorescent tubes, oil filters, batteries, and
e-waste. Participation continues to be steady thus decreasing the amount of HHW
that is currently mixed in with other solid waste streams.
City residents are able to dispose of household hazardous waste at Riverside
County's Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility at 1100 Vella Road, Palm
Springs (Saturdays only from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.). The Coachella Valley
Transfer Station located at 87-011 Landfill Road (near Coachella) accepts Anti-
223
freeze, Batteries, Oil, and Paint (ABOP) on Mondays through Fridays from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to noon.
The Burrtec Waste and Recycling facility, at 41-800 Corporate Way in Palm Desert,
is open to La Quinta residents for free disposal of batteries, fluorescent bulbs and
tubes, all electronics, oil and oil filters Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to noon. La Quinta residents may also
dispose of green waste (up to 500 pounds per trip) on Monday through Friday from
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (Saturdays 8:00 a.m. to noon).
Conclusion
The City has been very pro -active in developing programs, training staff and
reaching out to La Quinta residents to ensure reduction in water and energy
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Please visit the City's "Green"
webpage http://www.la-guinta.org/Index.aspx?page=574 to obtain additional
information on what the City is doing to "go green". Staff will continue to make
significant efforts to meet the City Council's expectations to protect the
environment and maintain a "Green and Sustainable La Quinta."
224
JULY 19
AUGUST 2
AUGUST 16
SEPTEMBER 5
SEPTEMBER 6
SEPTEMBER 20
OCTOBER 4
OCTOBER 17
DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3A
CITY COUNCIL'S
UPCOMING EVENTS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL - DARK
CITY HALL CLOSED - LABOR DAY
CITY COUNCIL- DARK
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2 2-5
July 2011
Monthly Planner
2
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10:00 AM Trani
3:00 PM City Council
Meeting
ID:OOAM-ALRC
Grand Opening Wellness
Center
Henderson
Independence Day
CITY HALL CLOSED
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
10:00 AM Pub. Shy
7:00 PM Planning
9:00 AM RCTC
9:30 AM Animal Campne-
ranklin11:00
9:00 AM CVA-Evans
Henderson
Commission
Henderson
AM CVCC Stilt
3:00 PM Mms.
4:00 PM Investment
12:00 PM Energyl
Consversancy Franklin
Advisory Board
Envimn: Sniff
5:30 PM Community
Services Commission
6:00 PM League
Henderson
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1000 AM TransP-
Henderson
3'.00 PM City Council
Meeting
i 000 AM Homelessness
Cmte: Franklin
3:00PMHistoric Preset -
12:00 Pln HCRCFranklin
vation Commission
2:00 PM Cochran
Regional Airport -
Franklin
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
10:30 AM RCTC Budget
7:00 PM Planning Commis
12:00 PM Sunline Adolph
9:00 AM LAFCO-
Henderson
lion Cancelled
Henderson
6:00 PM Exec Came.
Adolph
31
June Auonst
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7 S 9 10 11 12 13
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31
Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/11/2011 1226
August 2011
Monthly Planner
.-
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
10:00 AM Transp
3'. 00 PM City Cooncil
Meeling
W00 AM -ALRC
12: 00 PM Mayor s Lunch
Henderson
6'.00 PM no Energy
Corte -Franklin
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
10:00 AM Pub. Sty
7:00 PM Planning
9:00 AM RCTC.
11,00 AM wcC-Snip
Henderson
Commission
Henderson
12:00 PM Energyl
530 PM Community
Services Commission
4:00 PM Investment
Environ Sniff
6:00 PM League
Advisor y Board
Henderson
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3:00 PM City Council
Meeting - CANCELLED
10'.00 AM Homelessness
Cmle:Franklin
3.00 PM Historic Preset.
0:00 AM CVA Evans
Ph1 HICK Franklin
yalielt Commission12:00
2:00 PM J.Cochran
Reg Airport -Franklin
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
10:30 AM RCTC Budget
7:00 PM Planning Commis
12:00 PM Sunline Adolph
9:00 AM LAFCi
Henderson
Sion Cancelled
Henderson
28
29
30
31
10 00 AM Transp:
Henderson
July September
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 1 2 3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 II 12 13 14 15 I6 II 12 I} 14 IS IG 17
17 I8 19 20 21 22 29 23 _ IS 19 20 21 22 23 24
24 25 26 27 23 30
31 i 25 26 27 28 29 30
Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/11/2011 227
September 2011
Monthly Planner
1
2
3
August October
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 1
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 It 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
28 29 30 31 30 31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10:00 AM Transp
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CANCELLED
10'.00AM-ALRC
930AMAnimalCanlpus-
Franklin
Henderson
11:00 AM CVCC-Sndf
12:00 PM Ear l
Envirm. Sniff
Labor Day
(CITY HALL CLOSED)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
10:00 AM Pub. Sfty
7:00 PM Planning
9:00 AM RCTC
3:00 PM Historic Preser
9:00 AM CVA-Evans
Henderson
Commission
Henderson
valion Commission
3:00 PM Mtns.
4:00 PM Investment
Comsversancy Franklin
Advisory Board
5.30 PM Community
services Commission
6:00 PM League -
Henderson
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3. 00 PM City Council
Meeting
10'.00 AM Homelessness
Cmle.Franklin
9:00 AM LAFCO
12:00 PM HCRC-Franklin
Henderson
25
26
27
28
29
30
10:30 AM RCTC Budget
7:00 PM Planning Commis
12:00 PM Sunline Adolph
Henderson
lion Cancelled
6:00 PM Exec Crude.
Adolph
Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 7/11/2011 228
DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4
T,vf 4 a-&IRQ"
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the gity Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Building & Safety
DATE: July 19, 2011
RE: Department Report — June, 2011
Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control,
Code Compliance, and garage sale permits for the month of June. The statistical
summaries depict the following highlights:
• Year-to-date building permit valuation is $20,752,797 which represents an
issuance of 141 building permits in June;
• Animal Control handled 444 cases in June;
• Code Compliance initiated 201 cases in June;
• Garage sale permits generated $1600 revenue in June.
229
w .+ T4 N O n N In I N a N o i n
C O 74 ••I N N j 10 Of ro N 10 M N a
Q O1 i 01 ( In It N I Ln M P N a M
M rl I% O IO w M w •0 w
aN. rl 1 N M a IO Ifl j M N M a( N
> o
o i i
ja in of ' li m rl w a o .•i i ro n
q o O N 01 O M M i 01 M O I N 0( m
C
id~i U.r1 N toa N C.N n._ n 1+f... O..
In
F m a N P m( N N o' w In N( N a' M
C a 01 a n In O H M M I% O1
a 01 N( T•1 10 ' 00 H N M a 00
In O n IO r1 N i MOl
O 0 00 ; N N N n1
Z a 1 n N 01 01 1� M I O In N co
0
� Ip M � OD i M O I ; I� i ; � Of 1 ;
-4 2 M N j rl M ••I cl M N ll� a( 00 In
-.__
liLL
..
0 N tf
....._.__ ...___
t0 P M M( M N O
ui
o a ar {
v 104.1 N: 0 N N 7 d M N _M._i O M( 'i .4 .d M
J C i P N O O1 O1 ! a! �. at
n
m r 1 .1 j 0 o 1 N Na �) I n
N 0 N 1 QI .+ %6 N
07 N M Ol I% I 94 M ! O ( In
i� ( I%
— -r— r—
o ml.�i o1 e°Dv!a� cc
(no _
d am( D M j M In I M n i N
U.
I �._No
)
Io ar A a '° o o d t o d
a I z; rn i l a. rn!
230
g p O O d b m m N m Y O O VI O-N O O m
r1d 00 pN Yr dNNO t'1N ON 00 q
I m I min N m0 r0r rI FObY Y O m
I W I mill p YN'10ggOr r O b 0 V
1 W I .i m N timNogloN mrl rv.l m
1 W I ry r'1 �-1 Y n1 O 'r N t7
a l q r O q N r4 O b m N N O N O N
') �a'
I w4. I .. ri b
I a' I m 1�1 b r ri O rl q N N rl r1 `L
ei N N P q N b
a � ^
❑a
.ON
..a
la
Iw
I a w
r
N NH
r� r� 'I
mw
a
I m I M rl O rl r N 1�1 O N N m g N 1'1 O 1+1 r4 O O
a
a
Y r'1 Y10 mr oNNmfio 00 m Ill oo rl
I w o r4 O1CO b q r�O N N r O p O b N O O N
a rl w I m I r m t"1 N q Yf r 1I1 N Ul N O t7 O Y O D N
Z \ ry Y
Opw
b F
U 6 W ' Q O N N O O If1 IIl r O O m g b O COO O Y
.pa a ❑a OON OI1 df`tONryP m OOOq Y
a F w
O m b Ifl m rl O b 11 m
a a Nt( ri 0111 W. p Mb rN mYr qr'I N b
m. NV N N Vf ry N rl �'1 N rl O
Q \4io l a ON
l N N dl'1 N ti p
0. �
W..mla
ubFla-1 E
I -I rl a I m
F ❑Sm F I Ylm M r'Igry O1p NO N1+1 IllON NNd q
N U P W: I I� i rl nl m N ri IO N T r1 d
N
F a ❑ � � � a
m �nml
w gg
F TmF I I m r Ym.�.+gry ob N Y lon rob.INd ..
waa anal
m oawllal
aWoal
W
z m
a z
w a
❑ a
r a
a m
M ❑ H a
mnF s ww 4 wFa
m . 0 �..� z �u..
UgH
M l u lO a> mw 1 ami M 'H
oa z .o,uW.auz.�j. u.zmgmg,w N o.z. on 00Wa �
a F pGp lOIqaMO E4,0H FPELoatai dgwz
o u aS Pam2 amma a C o Ulto NF
r �� xwoux o z [mrz
H d IO-1C W muRm Ufal ma W.O.oOa
u la 1 °�mu❑wsaaaaaamwwmw�
231
m
@
O
tF
N
O
NO
�
04
MO
n
V
ty
t0
M
V
N
(D
f-
tp.
OON
O
N.
(OOOD
f0
UO
�O
M
f�fO
N
co
A
co
O
Y
N
1
M
UA
M
N
H
a)
Y
U
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
�w
o00
0
0
0
0
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0000
0
0
0
�M0
�
CDO
NCO
aMDN
O
�
�
�
O
�
OON
co
N
OO
�
•f'
Q
N
N
N
N
t 0
0
N
O
o
O
a D
N
t 0
V)
0
0
0
0
0
001
N
N
N
N
e
NNO
N�
O
co
NO
r
v'
NTT
oo
of00
10
v�
d'^
Q
co
N
a
M
CO
�O
W
O
�Na
MfO�
OO
OOO�i
N
IT
Mco
`V
V
1O
O
M
N
00
�
OOO
v
W
N
0
N
N..N
V
! 7
a)
M
LL
M
N
O
N
1-
0
O
I h
0
co
co
O
N
M
OD
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
N
o
v
in0
N
0
r
P!
y
C
O
O
O
OMCL
OEW
m
w
C
C
C
Y
C
a)
J
m
N
=
a)
V
IL
E
EH
Ea
Eyi
�E�
o
Y3
meO
c
YH
10
F
co
E
:°-
p
U
I
a1
E
1�
N
(D
E=
m
0
Q
O
a
aa)
Q
aci
u
J
>
p
�+
t
d
a)
>
N
C
N
>
C
Q>
O
'
D
l0
d
C
Q
O
O
m
d
C
Q
U)
H
a)
—
W
j
O
a1
C
Z
O
l0
_N
C—
N
>
C
J
�QO
¢00
d
Q❑
QOLU
Z
w
m—
m
o._
C
L-
v
w
d
acat�
Q
as
wL+
O
O
O
Q
C
Fn
C
V
O
0
0
`_"
O~Q
JO
O
OZQJOF
O
C
ZO
U
F
F
V
N_j00
F
C
<
Z
5;
H
232
Y�
N
N
Q
Q.
O
n
(14
w
Cl)
N
Cl)
t0
t0
O
Ih
f0
V
CN
(O
LO
Ih
�O
0
'CO
O
O
�
N
N
It
N
10
N
n
O
In
�-
WO
f0
0
r
r
U)
Go
r
O
H
N
Y
w
0
00
z
o
0
�
o0
�
o
0
Q
o
0
00
7
hN
�N
co
N�
Y
(O
Lo
I��O
r
p
7
N
N
CaD
N
O
I-
M
co
(O
O
�
T
O
O
A
m
N
f0
0
V^'
�
co
�-
�-
N
t0
1,01T
co
O
00
V
M
W
�
M
�O
N
Q
V
co
Y
co
M
N
W
t0
N
co
N
Of
N
w
M
N
Cl)
N
CO
n
a
N
r
W
M
N
`CN
O
0)
N
N
N
N
V
N
0)
0
N
N
M
LL
M
O
O
M
N
N
n
M
O
M
QOO
N
7
U
th
Q
W
CL
y
Z�
g
Z
H
W
C
A
y
Z
LL'
W
W
C
j
W
2
O
>
NFZy
j
O
LL
m
Z
d
K
W
W
LU
Z
m
-o
O
v
v
Q
v
0
v
G
U
'O
J
a
LL
W
Q
Q
N
U
�:
U
O
O
J
Q
F
C
Z
WO
N
N
4
.O
N
a
V
d
v
d
y
U
LL
y
v
d
y
K
U
W
Q
��E
CL
Q
Z
e�E
arE
J�E
ZEE
w
W
rE�VOQp
y
ayU
O
NtnU
O
O
W
«�
<nU
O
U
O
O
G
JfnU
SR-
O
.9.'3
O
FFU
O
N
Z
rA
O
O
C.)
LL
W
y
J
=fnU
JgyO
z
3
>
m
00x
gIRI
m'
233
DEPARTMENT REPORT: S
cF'y OF
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Community Services Department Report for June 2011
Upcoming events of the Community Services Department for August 201 1:
Aquatics Adult Lap Swim, Pool
Swim Meets, Pool
Free Swim Night, Pool
Open/Recreational Swim, Pool
Morning/Evening Swim Lessons, Pool
Computers Intro to MS Outlook, Senior Center
Use a Digital Camera, Senior Center
Excursions Fun in Huntington Beach
Exercise & Fitness *Morning Workout
*Mat Pilates
*Core Stability Ball
W.E.L.L. Morning Walks, Civic Center Campus
Tai Chi Chuan/Qi Gong, Fitness Center
Yoga AM, Library
Yoga PM, Museum
Jazzercise, Senior Center
Zumba, Senior Center
Free Programs *Quitters
*Woodcarvers
Leisure Enrichment Hawaiian Culture & Hula (9-13 yrs; 14 & up), Senior Center
Martial Arts Karate/ Taekwondo, Senior Center
Special Events *Annual Back to School Luncheon
Moonlight Movies, Old -Town 234
Special Interest *Mature Driver
Sports
Summer Golf Tour Desert Willow, Fire Cliff Course
Marriott's Shadow Ridge
Eagle Falls Golf Course
Classic Club at Palm Desert
Tour Banquet, Bellatrix Restaurant at Classic Club
*Senior Center class or activity
235
Program
Community Services Department
Attendance Report for the Month of June 2011
Summary Sheet
2011 2010 Variance Sessions Per Month
2011 2010
Leisure Classes
179
91
88
86
77
Special Events
412
387
25
3
. 5
Sports
681
447
234
23
24
Fitness Center
461
668
-207
26
26
Senior Center
767
941
-174
73
86
Total
2,500
2,534
-34
211
218
Senior Services
Senior Center
264
306
-42
10
16
Total
264
306
-42
10
16
Sports User Groups
La Quinta Park Use
AYSO
100
200
-100
13
13
LQ Sports & Youth
1001
0
100
21
0
C.V. Revolution
25
0
25
3
0
Sports Complex
LQ Sports & Youth
200
300
-100
18
26
LQ Insanity
25
0
25
14
0
Facility/Park Rentals
Senior Center
Private Part
0
0
0
0
0
(Sunday Church
300
750
-450
4
8
Museum
Meeting Room
0
0
0
0
0
Library
Classroom
350
150
200
7
3
Civic Center Campus
Private Part
0
50
-50
0
1
Park Rentals
La Quinta Park
200
200
0
4
4
Fritz Burns Park
50
50
0
1
1
Total
1,350
1,700
-350
85
56
Total Pro rams
4,114
4,640
-426
3061
290
Vnluntaar Hours
Senior Center
1 2701
2031
67
Total Volunteer Ho
031
67
236
Community Services Program Report for June 2011
2011 . 2010 2011 2010
Participants
Participants
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Leisure Classes
Acrylic Painting
10
2
8
3
4
Dance And Cheer
8
0
8
4
0
Microsoft Excel
10
0
10
4
0
Computers - Inter.
6
0
6
5
0
MS Outlook
6
0
6
1
0
Tai Chi Chuan
4
6
-2
91
5
Zumba
10
23
-13
9
9
Yoga - Morning
8
7
1
4
4
Yoga - Evening
10
0
10
4
0
Ballet/ Tap 4- 6
5
0
5
1
0
Karate/ Taekwondo 4- 8
23
0
23
9
0
Karate/ Taekwondo 8 -11
36
0
36
9
0
Karate/ Taekwondo 11 & up
151
01
15
9
0
Self Defense
10
01
10
1
0
Jazzercise
12
11
0
7
13
BodySculpting/ Core Workout
6
6
0
7
9
Totals
179
561
1231
861
44
2011 2010 2011 2010
Participants
Participants
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Special Events
Moonlight Movie @ Old Town
300
235
65
1
1
Dodgers Game Excursion
56
0
56
1
0
My Fair Lady Excursion
56
0
56
1
0
Totals
412
235
177
3
1
2044 gnin 2011 2010
Participants I
Participants
Variance
Meetings
Meetings
Sports & Fitness
Fitness Center
4611
668
-207
26
26
open Gym Basketball
400
348
52
13
19
Open Gym Volleyball
80
69
11
5
4
W.E.L.L. Walking Club
8
0
8
1
0
Golf Tour, Golf Club at La Quinta
45
41
4
1
1
Golf Tour, Rancho Mirage C.C.
48
0
481
0
Golf Tour, Escena Golf Club
49
40
9
1
1
Golf Tour, Shadow Hills Golf Club
51
39
12
1
1
Totals
1142
1205
•63
49
52
Communit Services Totals 61 2371 1381 97
237
Monthly Revenue Report for June 2011
Monthly Ravan„a _ Fneility Rantals 2011 2010 Variance
Libra
$
$
$
Museum
$
$
$
Senior Center
$
900.00
$
2,437.50
$
1,537.50
Parks
$
210.00
$
200.00
$
10.00
Sports Fields
$
395.00
$
480.00
$
85.00
Monthly Facility Revenue
$
1,505.00
$
3,117.50
$
1,612.50
Monthly Revenue
Senior Center
$
2,131.00
$
2,204.50
1 $
73.50
CommunityServices
$
6,769.00
$
2,966.00
$
3,803.00
La Quinta Resident Cards
$
4,060.00
$
7,080.00
$
3,020.00
Fitness Cards
$
2,305.00
$
825.00
$
1,480.00
Total Revenue
$
15,265.00
$
13,075.50
$
2,189.50
Da..an„a Vaar rn nnta
Facility Revenue
$
50,968.50
$
63,493.00
$
12,524.50
Senior Center **
$
53,521.50
$
73,830.00
$
20,308.50
CommunityServices
$
64,595.00
$
51,138.50
$
13,456.50
La Quinta Resident Cards
$
88,815.00
$
42,450.00
$
46,365.00
Fitness Cards
$
9,325.00
$
7,570.00
$
1,755.00
Total Revenue to Date
$ 267,225.00
$ 238,481.50
$
28,743.50
' Decrease in Senior Center facility revenue due to late payment by church user group.
**In 2010, the City received a $10,000 donation from David Orme's Trust which was used
to update the Senior Center computer lab.
7.3a
Senior Center Attendance
Senior Center Program Report for June 2011
Part ici ation
Partici at!on
Variance
Meet n s
eat en s
201
2 10
2011
2010
Senior Activities
ACBL 2 99ers'
124
196
-72
4
5
Bridge, Social/Pa
209
358
-149
16
15
Monthly Birthday Party
50
45
5
1
1
Monthly Luncheon Hawaiian Luau
88
97
-9
1
1
Movie Time
63
56
71
5
4
Puttinq Action
18
22
-4
4
5
Senior Activity Total
552
774
-222
31
31
Senior Leisure Classes
Acrylic Landscape Painting
7
0
7
1
0
Exercise
40
31
9
12
13
Mat Pilates
15
7
8
4
5
Quilters
49
29
20
5
4
Sketch/Draw
12
8
4
3
4
Ukulele Players
70
46
24
8
6
Watercolor
7
10
-3
3
2
Yoga for Health
9
4
5
4
4
Yoga for Seniors
6
0
6
2
0
Senior Leisure Classes Total
215
135
80
42
38
TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS
767
909
-142
73
69
Senior Services
Cool Center
54
22
32
13
9
FIND
159
241
-82
4
4
HICAP
6
4
2
2
2
Le al Consultation
7
5
2
1
1
LIHEAP
9
11
-2
1
2
'Notary/Financial Consults
2
0
0
2
0
Volunteers
27
27
0
n/a
n/a
TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES
264
310
-80
10
9
SENIOR CENTER TOTAL
10311
1219
-222
$31
78
New ACBL Bridge group - This group is smaller than the original ACBL group.
239
Parks Activities Updates
For June 2011
The slide at Velasco Park has been replaced. The new slide is blue and is
more durable and resistant to graffiti and vandalism.
Two playground spin cups that are located at La Quinta Park Playground and
the Fritz Burns Park Playground were vandalized. These two features are
being replaced by the manufacturer at no cost to the City.
A couple of concrete panels and curb sections around the playground were
replaced at Monticello Park. Some of the mature mesquite trees had started
lifting a couple of the sidewalk panels. Instead of removing the trees, it was
determined to replace small sections of concrete. Monticello Park does not
have any shade structures and the mature trees provide needed shade for
the enjoyment of the facility. Monticello Park is located on Monticello and
Fred Waring Drive, one block west of Jefferson Street.
The interactive water feature at La Quinta Park now operates from 9 a.m. to
9 p.m. The operation was extended from 7 p.m. because of the longer
daylight hours and higher temperatures. The water feature is very popular
and is used continuously throughout the day.
Additional safety surfacing material was added to the playground areas at
Monticello Park, La Quinta Park, and Desert Pride Park. Each month, staff
monitors the amount of material that is in the playgrounds. Every couple of
years, it is necessary to order additional safety material to insure the safety
surface remains above the minimum levels.
The City has changed suppliers for dog bags and dog bag dispensers. Due
to the increased popularity of dog companionship and usage at the three City
dog parks, costs for the dog bags have increased substantially over the past
two years.
?- 4
DEPARTMENT REPORT:
a
04��a�w
Fy OF T
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Edie Hylton, Community Services Directo
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Update on the.City's 30" Anniversary Celebration Events
Staff is beginning the preliminary efforts to plan and promote the 30" Anniversary
events to be held in 2012. For the 25`" Anniversary, the Celebration Committee
established by City Council was responsible for planning the City-wide activities
and events. This year, staff is coordinating efforts among the following
organizations to promote and celebrate the 30`" Anniversary. Special Events will be
developed by the following:
• La Quinta Historical Society
• La Quinta Chamber of Commerce
• La Quinta Arts Foundation
• Desert Cities Charities .
• La Quinta Library and Museum
• Community Services Commission and staff
The Community Services and City Marketing staff will be coordinating periodic
communication meetings to share information and to obtain details from each of
the groups regarding their event plans.
To date, the events included in the 301" Anniversary promotion include:
Blues and Brews
• Art Under the Umbrellas
• Adult and Youth Nature Hikes
• Evenings with Friends of the Library
• Humana Challenge Golf Tournament
• Desert Classic Concours d'Elegance
• La Quinta Hot Rod & Custom Car Show
• La Quinta Arts Festival
• A Taste of La Quinta 241
• California Pioneers Exhibit and Lectures
• Historic Tours of La Quinta
• Talent Showcase at the La Quinta Senior Center
• Community Picnic and Birthday Party
• SilverRock Resident Golf Tournament
As part of the City's marketing agreement, Furino/Greene Creative will promote the
events that are being planned. No additional marketing dollars will be expended
aside from those approved by City Council as part of the City's Fiscal Year
2011/2012 budget. Attachment 1 is a preliminary marketing plan for the 30'h
Anniversary the City Council's review. A special graphic has been designed that
integrates a 30`h Anniversary icon into the City's existing marketing logo. The
marketing materials will have the graphic integrated for the events that are
planned.
Attachment: 1. Preliminary Marketing Plan
242
ATTACHMENT 1
Promoting 30`" Anniversary via City Marketing Plan:
1 . Palm Spring Life Advertorial (October 2011) - Acknowledge upcoming year
as 30'h Anniversary for City of La Quinta (promote any activities confirmed to date)
2. 2012 City Calendar - 30" Anniversary theme weaved into calendar; to be
completed and mailed November 2011
3. Community Services Activities Guides - Feature 30' Anniversary logo and
planned events in August 2011 and February 2012 issues
4. Local Advertising Campaign - Promote 30" Anniversary events as part of
City's local advertising purchases in The Desert Sun, La Quinta Sun, Desert
Entertainer, and local radio (December 2011-April 2012)
5. New City TV Spots - Use 301" Anniversary logo on new City 30-second TV
spots; produce by November 2011
6. The Gem - Chamber monthly publication, "City Scene" pages; December
2011-April 2012 (calendar of 30' Anniversary events)
7. City Newsletters - Winter 2011/2012 issue to feature full calendar of 30'
Anniversary events; Spring 2012 to feature City's 30th Birthday Party & Picnic
8. City Websites - Promote 30`" Anniversary events on City's government .
website/Community Services page (click on 301" Anniversary logo for listing of
activities); promote 30`" Anniversary events on City's tourism website
(www.PlayinLaQuinta.com)
243
Page 1 of 3 6/24/11
9. Facebook Posts - Use "La Quinta, California" Facebook page to create
excitement, and post information about 30`h Anniversary events (December 2011-
April 2012)
10. City App - List 30' Anniversary events on City's iPhone app, which also
runs on the iPad and iPod Touch
11. Press Releases - Various press releases will be issued regarding 30`h
Anniversary festivities; first release to be issued in December 2011 or January
2012
12. E-mail Blasts - Issue monthly Community Services and La Quinta Museum e-
mail blasts beginning in January 2012; encourage partners to promote the events
in their monthly e-mail blasts
13. La Quinta Museum - Send monthly e-mail blasts promoting the California
Pioneers Exhibit and La Quinta Pioneers; La Quinta Historical Society will promote
the Historic Walking Tours and programs through their newsletter to members
14. SilverRock Resort - Promote the Resident Golf Tournament to be held in late
April 2012; this would be promoted at the golf course and through e-mail blasts to
resident cardholders
Promoting 30t" Anniversary via Partnerships & Major Events:
1. 30" Anniversary Logo - Graphic under design (same gem logo incorporating
"30" Anniversary"); provide key partners and major event organizers 30"
Anniversary logo for use during late-2011 and 2012 (e.g., Historical Society, Arts
Foundation, Chamber, Humana Challenge Golf Tournament, Concours d'Elegance,
County of Riverside, CVA)
2. La Quinta Historical Society - Activities and tours will be planned in
collaboration with the La Quinta Museum; they will be promoted in the La Quinta
Historical Society newsletter, La Quinta Museum e-mail blast, The Gem, and press
releases
3. La Quinta Arts Foundation - Promote 301h Anniversary via Arts Foundation
efforts and activities such as website, e-mail blasts, Blues & Brews, Art Under the
Umbrellas, and La Quinta Arts Festival
• Festival Program Ad - Acknowledge 301h Anniversary in Mayor's welcome
letter and full -page, color ad in La Quinta Arts Festival program guide for 2012
(part of City sponsorship) .244
Page 2 of 3 6/24/11
4. Chamber of Commerce - Promote 30`" Anniversary via Chamber efforts and
activities such as The Gem (feature article in January 2012), Chamber directory, e-
mail blasts, website, Chamber car show, an enhanced Mayor's State of the City
program, and Taste of La Quinta
5. Humana Challenge Golf Tournament - Acknowledge 30' Anniversary in
Mayor's welcome letter and full -page, color ad in the program guide for 2012;
weave 30`h Anniversary theme into two editorials City receives as part of
sponsorship
6. Desert Classic Concours d'Elegance - Acknowledge 30`h Anniversary in
Mayor's welcome letter and full -page, color ad in Concours d'Elegance program
guide for 2012 (part of City sponsorship)
2.45
Page 3 of 3 6/24/11
DEPARTMENT REPORT:
4 ZP Qu&&
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council �
FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City EngineerA-X/
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Report for June 2011
Attached please find the following:
1. Citizen Service Request Summary;
2. Encroachment Permit and Plan Check Services Summary;
3. Capital Improvement Plan Status Update;
4. Monthly Summary of Public Works Tasks;
— L4W4--:��2 Y��-
Timo y R. Jonasson
Public Works Director/City Engineer
246
Y
K
f
7
F N
2 Y
W J
f F
5 CL f
J III
N N
N W W
LL 7 2
0 am
3 w —
U V V
7K
aw
N
Z
F
U
247
U)
W
} U
J
ul
U)
NY
U
W
J 2
N H U
Z
=0g
2 a
R
W
C
O
CD
O
lti
M
O
S
N
N
{p
N
ids i, ,Ri
mnipl x
.
WH
ky
iMM:
Q
IL
Epa o
o
W
fi dV. N
W
112.
LL
1k.i
'I1Wmi
UR° ' 'G J
W
Z
QZQ
t5 'xr °i'
i+N.N-
J
a
MR RQ
?�;3k§,
f
OAT � R �•
d
CO
Ins
.12
1
-,� z
:..:.
O
a
P�,RIm. O
n:- F
.,., r
li'''x,i5M
O
N
J
O
CL
a
a
Q
O
0
a
a
0
N
948
O.
a) 0 o I-
ca 0-0 a)
O
> Z CO-)
0 >.O
00-0 0 N a) M a)
4) ca m cm -0 -5:t
04
OL D CL 0 c m OM
E CL .0
cc c 0 0 0
M
0
R 0 4) 0 C14
M
tm
cc M U co m
PM CD cc
C
a) co ca 0) C (D
-�;
C U)
I U 4) o c
ffi , - ' % >� 0
c 00 E I I
Egg- in cm 0 o ED L: m 0 u 0
0 0 �: r-
0 r Co >
IM c Lo x D 0 a) _j
0 m CL c c m C U) a) 0 cm 0) �
9mr,
< o a) c m 0 0 cc c
0 L)
=I "m -CON-
u c > 0
o 0 m cm 0 0 m
0 c I
0 L) 0 CL (D L) > o 5 11
Umw 0 0 C, , . m
m 0 0 C (D 0 E, -- d) 0 CL
m > mo = 0 r m
C (D Co c 0 0
0 CL r o a) MIS
o 4) 0 c 0 tl- 0 r CD
L) 'r, 0 0 a) I =) m — 0
= 0 u a) iffl. c o
4 Ml,�� 0 CN 0
m o 4) m
C E m r� 0 (D <
E >
" 3: 0
C tm 't U a) — 0 a) c
0 o m
t"i" C 0 3:
ie-I
LU 0 LL
>
0 0 0
HIRE
M ca 0 r r
C ma E o M o .2 o o
0 0 > m <
IL 0
0 'a a E >
m LU 0 CL o 6
LL �: 0 4) 0 U) 0 (D flp,7-
m 0
(0) ai 0
cr m a) m 0 :3 0 0 CL o > ca 0)
CL .0 3: 1 r_
LL 0 +;
E c cc E L) N
a) m
+; H
'a U) E CL CL
0) 0) 0 a) 4) 0) a) 0 n- .- — < m
0 *vi I c r- 0 > a (D E D
o " 1 4) &
co LU 0) a) r 4) m 00 4) o m 0 C , w. = � r
'40) 0 < cc in U) 0 L) -i CO3 L) CN L) o to
Lu
Co
n 04 2
0 0 (D 0
C 10 m
�-R
cts 2 u)
M.1 _j LU M rg
cn Z - HIM
IL >
z L)
HE
LU CD
Li 0
LU LL. CL
0
V
4 'WE
RN CO
p, u
co
Mv,
ffm� U I
LU C6
U)
m
Ln
4A
CD M
La
E CM
O.
r —
> >
ain (D 0.
4 ca
E
Ic
ui C6
n Im
0 010 . v; o '02) 5 E E
cc Ic N 2
L w 04 w U)
�'0
y:'•wt@;YYU0NA°�O�TOm�_0;
(14cy��wUSVYVN7N`CmWNN0CNNOd"+
y
Na3ccm
dc
p'�YYUO3
°
�
°°rn
N
0)0
NNCo
OL
ON
M
CL
-
U
Y2W7n
yCV
0Nd
N�nOO�cN�tn.xoYUCCOy�CmI'II
N
p
mCC
O CO
��
Co
-CW
-0N
CNCm
UCcoN
U
C
CQ0)U
NU0)'Y'0
!�d��L,�U�N�_''
COO
C
.
tU6�
C
C°
O.Q.=rYaY`C7E�3+
In-0C
1
co
muz
cU
U^°'7NUyN
CN7N>U
NU
WC
OWO
'aO
�
F°d
`
•LO,L�'N'Ya�Y+YN
N�NNVa)L
yn
w"�'QYa.aN7OyOC�+.++f
N
��y,,
�V
O.N
a`
�°x
NCdO
N°
0C
yNE
°
UcoN
co U)
C
{6 N
N
N U)�
1
C=.YU_3yO_N7
U
°
C°0
O�QN
N
� C
N
0C O
-
(DUd0�C7Qy
V�cm
.'�y�«�
c0
vc�°.aNC
°7EN>t°o`Nc•�a'd°E
c01
L.Y�_UN
�%
C•
QmOJ
L
Ny
00E
p
NVON
dENCi+
.OU
O
C
C
0Co•`C
NONQOC
UOU
0)CO
ON
7��NN
O'O 0C
Co
03N
l
°
ma(D0
C.0p
-
cc
(
L O
O U
N>
YCpOmC
N
N-j
�
0
o
UUFOw-V-��•vlNuNO�>_-w0+
UUUyC«Y.Oo
,
UGFOMO�r��_���oVYCcUCpON�aI�II
�
.
Vo
)
�•LVF�mQL�Ui«�E
n�OO�'-•7mee.�.OyVQmo.YYC
I
.�F�O�wSLm«YC
•
N °•
N
M C?
a 0
CL.
co
L
_>
,F 7 (Yj
E E
O
C
N
7
N
Y
7
U
O
U
C
N Y
C M N
y 0
E
0
F
M
a O@
r
U
N
a
N
m
0~
C
!0
�.
C'
U N
j O
O C +`+
U U
N
O
C Y=
C
7�
y«
L
N
L
7
Vr
O N
C
.,a�'
W�
�
U p C
?
0
�.
N.
l0
CL
�`+
y
'y
R
Z
N N
O U
f0 l6
p.
N
>. N
N O
U
C
tp N
�
d a
O.
.��ra
0
.0
.O
S
C
f0 m
O) L�
N
lL
U
L
�Fi51�
C M N`
cc
n
Y
C
a
U V N
�°
U
N
R�
CF
Y
Y
C�
co
f�
O`
j
�'
N y
U
a s
d O~
(0
C
¢
W.�
gima
p
CM W
O to
E f0 y
C
a C�
y j
C W
C
y
�
�`p
C
U V'
OU
y
U-
p\�"'i.
O
N
O
r
C
U
0
U >,
W In ��
�'
°
.7..
C U
'° C
N C f`0
m `p
°>��
N Y
Q
N
«
>.
Skiff;
N
O;
N
•�,
Y
p S
L
U N?
N
N
O A
0
a
m
a
'•��o��OC
"yda+Op'+'•
0.t�rOCcoO
t••yJF
.NCOC�•NmuUcri
CNTWO
!UoQ•U�v.�w«C0mOc+,
Y
U
•��2��L'��YA00
Bw�L�L..,aCN�CaN3y_d-,.j
0
CNC3
MNNaQ(4�U>
67
�.�LQ'aYcN°o-'
OLULNCc0�.N
O
N
F>cca�
,.�.'_�•YCN��C�N
O�O
C?
CO7NC
L
yN
CUNCoO
NE°oa
0
ao a�.0N
o�
5H
mo?
°._dpY'cU�N�CcN°O3OCdUENO
cl
y0CCN-0�Co
o>
Q•��NOrCoQc.,.
a @
iNQpNCE
)
OEO
�Z
>dL
am�>I-
mUo
aiv
cL)m
to
L�•OC7,
o.yo
U) o
a)0)0o
O
E
NM
? 47
O)
NZN
C7U
E
*0
E(O
cE
Cpp)OC
•L~KQOON�.00��aVC
O�Oyp3doO
0
a)d
ao)
Lca)aoNU
O
O
C01NmW=y0�
0O'O
U)
�OOON•��fr3OO+«C
todp)
m
>
0)
�ao
�°
m°
m
Nd�mam
0�HU•L,.0
04
0
.0yLowl0V0C
Em
jWC3
p
SyyUa)a,oyW
Ejpd
p
E
u
0
y-0WN'a
a)o
cwo
o�vc0
MN -0
L O
N
����N
O,r N0)mp>
0)0
N
00.
l0
O
dC
-0`�
C U
.mrni��c
WC0
w
00)d�mou
fnya
doQc°�o
rn
oo°a�yooN
ccpy3 Va)0)0o�oad
L)a
IF
Ea)o
01
UW U
:O
dLr-d
a)CpC
O
N
aOa)D'mttya
NUNpLLEa
0
a)m
pC
-°
Cm
ccaiod@
�o
YmEnor(DaaO
m
U E
3La0aU
Q
N
m
m
�OO•'Q��1MN_OO�«Nm�NNOccCfHr0N0I•
N
0
N
m
0)
co
co
rl
N
M
IL
N
N
OD
LLY
li
M
t?E
«'yf�'NUcdE'_p+.
W
W
Or
E00
•�cWm
W F
Eo
•
JOo_
N O U
C N
N Ci
4 C
O
N
O
L �._L
pO-
dL
C to Om
�.,=
_
U
v F
d�
N N—
L a
N
N N
L
0 y�
L
NLo
aaD 3 °
dZ
;go
m
7 N
L��
c�"�
.00 N O
N
yL+
N
�
d
"N
N�
N
1O
++ U—
� m �'
C
>a'v'�
y
a� �'cn
W
i0
0v
.O On
W 7
N C
aN+ N
N ++
N
C
n. o�
N d Y
'a `cN'
m� 3 �
d
�
N 'O
'O
> N N
O.
O
Z N O
�
dv �
=~ 3
3 �N
� c o,V
E �,
aXi
O �
0,
a �
0
C>
.&
N .O
V
�
f0 y n. �
�
V-
O
O �
� � N �
N N
y
C�.1
Wa
M H
>� N
N
N>
C�
L�
�
CN
N
N
C@
d C
U rn
m
L 'U
7
O N
0
N
C>�
�.
f
y C
N�
cU•�
N ccpv'c
m
U
'y
O> C
Y
C
N>
G
l0 U
N m N U
f0
a+ U y?,,
OU Nei
f07U
NN�OF'O
�U
m
m
H
F
m
~
O
I
I
O
�
O
O
a
a
0
0
r 3
c � o
0 G
o r
»_
5 � q
r
o
do
.2«�
ca
'O
Z
®
N W
W O
W C
�G
NN
NU1 W
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF PUBLIC WORKS TASKS MONTH OF: June, 2011
Employee's Hourly Labor Breakdown
Crew#1
Crew #2
Crew #3
Maint. Mg.
Code
Activity
5 Men
4 Men
3 Men
1 Man
Total
1000
Policing/Inspection
43
98
3
8
152
1001
Pot Hole-Repair/Patching
2
16
0
0
18
1002
Crack/Joint-Repair
0
0
0
0
0
1003
Pavement Marking/Legends
0
0
0
0
0
1004
Pavement Marking/Striping
0
6
0
0
6
1005
Curb Painting
0
0
0
0
0
1006
Other Traffic Controls
12
46
0
0
58
1007
Curb & Gutter Repair/Cons[
0
0
0
0
0
1008
Other Concrete Repairs/Const.
6
5
0
0
11
1009
Street Sign Install (New)
0
3
0
0
3
1010
Street Sign Repair/Maint
99
15
0
7
121
1011
Debris Removal
43
44
0
5
92
1012
Right of Way Maint.
12
21
67
0
100
1021
CLEAN Catch Basin Inlet/Outlet
3
8
0
2
13
1022
Rondo Channel Outlet/Vault
0
0
0
0
0
1022A
Desert Club Outlet/Vault
0
0
0
0
0
1023
S.D./ D.W./C.B. Repair/Maint.
0
0
0
5
5
1024
Gutter/Median Sand Removal
0
0
0
0
0
1025
Street Sweeping (Machine)
0
179
0
0
179
1026
Street Sweeping (Hand)
0
0
0
0
0
1027
Sidewalk/Bike Path Cleaning
0
0
0
0
0
1028
Dust Control
0
0
0
0
0
1029
Flood Control
0
0
0
0
0
1031
Parks/Retention Basins Inspection/Clean-L
3
21
118
1
143
1041
Irrig/ Weeding, Shrubs & Tree Trimming
29
0
218
7
254
1051
Landscape/irrigation Contract Managemen
0
0
23
18
41
1052
Lighting/Electrical Contract Management
0
0
25
18
43
1061
Small Tools Repair/Maint.
0
0
0
0
0
1062
Equipment Repair/Maint.
0
0
0
0
0
1063
Vehicle Repair Maint.
3
3
2
0
8
1081
Trash/Litter/Recycable Removal
0
0
26
0
26
1082
Vandalism Repairs
0
5
0
0
5
1083
Graffiti Removal
255
112
40
13
420
1084
Maint. Yard Building Maint.
32
8
4
11
55
1085
Seminars/Training
0
26
0
4
30
1086
Special Events
0
8
2
4
14
1087
Citizen Complaints/Requests
138
70
2
0
210
1088
Meeting
8
24
12
33
77
1089
Office (Phone, paper work, reports, Misc.)
41
34
15
68
158
SUBTOTAL
729
752
557
204
2242
1091
Over Time
3
7
22
0
32
1094
Jury Duty(
0
0
0
0
0
1095
Sick Leave
27
14
14
0
55
1096
Vacation
8
0
9
0
17
1097
Holiday
36
34
24
0
94
1098
Floating Holiday
0
0
0
0
1099
Worker Comp/ Bereavement/ STD
200
0
0
0
200
SUBTOTAL
274
55
69
0
398
TOTAL HOURS
1003
807
626
204
2640
TOTAL MILES
4914
41031
33871
213
12617
?54
Department Report:
04
i-
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Les Johnson, Planning Directow
DATE: July 19, 2011
SUBJECT: Department Report for the Month of June 2011
Attached please find a copy of the Planning Department Report which outlines the
current cases processed by staff for the month of June 2011.
1 255
W LL
g0
F a
� W �
Q � �
0
W Z N
0 W W
U Z
Z D
Z Q
Z a
W
IL
LU
Z
H
0
a
m
D
U
U)
W
W
Y
m
'D
"D
-D
"D
m
m
m
U
'D
"D
"D
'D
'B
'D
"O
"D
"D
"D
'D
'D
'D
Q
W
0)
0)
(D
(D
0)
a)
N
N
N
N
0)
0)
N
N
(D
a)
N
N
0)
a)
N
a)U
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
E
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
M+
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
t+
t+
4+
M+Y
Y
Y
=
V
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
O
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
m
a
a
a
a
a
W
Z
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
0
7
7
7
0
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
0
7
7
z
a
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
J
a
000,0�
c,
OOOON-00,m00,W
am
Z
Q
CO
Z
O
J
Ul
he
WN
O
a
o
~
Cl)
a
}
N
C
Y
Y
Y
c
m
E
c
aci
m
E
Y
a)
a
~
N
N
0
E
E
N
f6
_
v
a
a�
d
a�
m
a
E
v
.O
W
y
D
N
a
C
C
N
N
a
OI
l6
yN
N
a
N
CO
O
C
Y
Q
a�
c
m
a
E
E
a
d
y
N
Q
Q
a
E
Q
Y
N
G%
E`
CC
>.
CO
•>
N
N
E
L
U
N
Y
U
N
N
Q
Y
co
7
Y
N
N
C:
N
C
f0
a
N
4)
(\A
C
N
W
D
j
a
O
>,
N
i=
a
O
o
G1
E
(0
a
H
N
C
a
c
fO
o
-o
a
Q
o
Y
..
a�
E
6
o-
m
o
w�
>,
N
m
o
0
o
Q
E
c
o
v
N
'6
c>
o
Z>>
m
L
U
y
c—yE
`---a
O
a
C
o
'>
��
°c
°
c
ymmacm
c
c
'c
a
>
c
c_°
O
E'
tm
a)
0)
c
E
'�
7
a
Q
O
N
0
C
C
iL
47
O
0
D
a
d
a
in
+=
in
a
u>
Y
cn
N
H
N
►-
N=
F-
>
0
n�
0
ry
cn
U
W
'56
LC
}
O
N
U O
Q M
Z W
O z
N Z)
U)
O
O O
U p
Ur N
Z_
Z }
O
N
N
Lr)
r
N
z
O
H
a
E:
U
M
W
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
a
o
0
o
o
D
p
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0 N
N
y,�
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
W
`
:ttY
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
O
O
a
-0.0a
.0-0
-0a.0
.0
a-0.0a
-0.n
¢
aC
o
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
IL
a
d
CL
O
M
O
•-
O
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
N
Q
Q
W
N
O
H
Q
O
J
O
Q
LL
p
W
W
N
W
IL
H
O
Y
c
E
y
U
m
'E
O
W
�'
cc
UE
:
E
E
m
a
m
a)
m
LL
Q
W
rn
a)
m
a�
a
c
a
a
m
mcn
c
O
V
N
d
N
M
a)
Q
C
m
CC
Q
cn
Q
Q—
O
75
Q
LU
C�
LU
d
Q
co
U
U
N
a)
m
G
m
O
c
U
c
c
N
O.
O
m
m
d
N
ID
c
(Dv
m
o
*=
o
a
E
a
I-
y
c
o
O
O
o
a
E
c
a
�>
Z
>>>
c
U
Z
U
0
10
N
o
•Y
'Y
U
J
J
.t'
o
J
f0
a
O
:�
+,,,
m
m
a)
O)
CE
C
Q
Q
'O
>
.>
N
U
m
Y
Y
a)'El
0
CM
Q
U
0
w
iL
(D
(n
(n
U)
(A
F
H
>
N
N
H
F-
25 7
Department Report:
LA LINTA P,@LICF
Served by the Riverside County Sherffs Departnerrt
Police Department Monthly Report
June 2011
Prepared for
r
u
258
11
La Quinta Police Department
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY REPORT
Captain Raymond Gregory
Chief of Police
Wednesday, June 1,2011
3:30 PM — Officers were dispatched to a report of an assault with a deadly weapon at Avenida Montezuma and
Eisenhower Drive. Andreas Montemayor, 44, of Cathedral City threw rocks at the victim striking her in the head.
Montemayor fled the scene but was later located and arrested. He was booked into the Indio Jail for assault with a
deadly weapon, misdemeanor domestic battery, and violation of a restraining order.
Thursday, June 2, 2011
11:00 PM -- Officers conducted a traffic stop on Hwy I I I and Madison St. and arrested Desideriu Faji, 51, of Indio
for DUI.
Friday, June 3,2011
12:01 AM — Patrol officers conducted a traffic stop at Eisenhower and Calle Sinaloa and arrested Kevin John Weddle,
21, of Indio for DUI.
Saturday, June 4, 2011
19 5:00 AM -- Officers conducted a vehicle check on Ave. 52 and Madison St. A male adult in the vehicle, Martin
Nunez (42 of Indio), was arrested for providing false personal information to a police officer and seven arrests
warrants. Nunez was booked into the Indio Jail.
11:15 AM — Officers responded to the 47600 block of Wind Spirit Dr. regarding a domestic disturbance. Kelly
Renaud, 45, of La Quinta was arrested and transported to Indio jail for spousal abuse.
12:30 PM -- Officers responded to the 79300 block of Desert Stream in reference to a mentally unstable subject.
Officers determined that she was not a danger to herself or others and she was allowed to remain at the residence.
Sunday, June 5.2011
11:16 PM — Officers responded to the 45200 block of Seeley Drive regarding a domestic disturbance. Boyd Beghtol,
39, of La Quinta was arrested for domestic battery and booked into the Indio Jail.
Monday, June 6, 2011
12:25 PM — The Business District Officer issued a citation to a problem transient, Cota Wetterson, 47, of Indio for
panhandling in front of a business located in the 78900 block of Highway 111.
1:52 PM — A juvenile, 17, of Indio was arrested by the Business District Officer for shoplifting at a business located in
the 79200 block of Highway 111.
4:44 PM — Officers responded to the 54400 block of Avenida Rubio in reference to a domestic disturbance. The
victim was assaulted by the suspect, Charles Campbell, 50, of La Quinta. The suspect fled before officers arrived. The
investigation is ongoing.
259
7:20 PM — Traffic Services Officers attempted to make a vehicle stop at Blackhawk Way and Dune Palms Drive. The
driver, Michael Reinholz, 55, of La Quinta failed to yield. A brief vehicle pursuit was initiated and ended at Jefferson
and Fred Waring. Reinholz refused deputies commands and was forcibly restrained. He was arrested for DUI and
felony evading.
Tuesday. June 7.2011
4:00 PM — Officers responded to the 51600 block of Avenida Rubio in reference to a domestic disturbance. Laura
Weiss, 47, of La Quinta was arrested for felony spousal abuse, assault with a deadly weapon and criminal threats.
Weiss was transported and booked into the Indio Jail.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
1:26 AM — Officers conducted an occupied vehicle check at the intersection of Monticello and Dandelion. Cesar
Duran, 29, of Coachella was in possession of burglary tools. Cesar was arrested for possession of burglary tools and
booked into the jail.
8:00 PM — Traffic Services Officers conducted a traffic enforcement stop at Avenue 52 and Desert Club. Miguel
Esparza, 31, of La Quinta was arrested for a misdemeanor warrant for driving under the influence, issued a citation
and released.
Thursday. June 9, 2011
9:30 AM — Officers arrested Carlos Canez, 28, of El Centro for grand theft. Canez had stolen rims from a vehicle at an
automobile dealership in the 79200 block of Highway I I 1 in early May 2011. Canez was identified when he attempted
to sell the stolen rims on Craig's List.
Aft 7:03 PM -- Special Enforcement Team Officers responded to the 52100 block of Avenida Rubio and arrested Raul
Carmona, 34, of La Quinta for parole violation.
7:08 PM -- Officers responded to Ave 48 and Washington in regards to a report of an attempted sexual assault at a
business. A male juvenile, 17, of Coachella was found inside the ladies restroom at the location. The juvenile
attempted to assault a female customer in the restroom. An extensive search of the area was conducted and the
juvenile was taken into custody after fighting with officers and was arrested for burglary, attempted sexual assault, and
resisting arrest.
Friday. June 10, 2011
9:47 AM -- Officers responded to the area of Calle Durango and Avenida Vallejo regarding a disturbance. Manuel
Torres, 31, of La Quinta was arrested for a felony domestic violence warrant and booked into the Indio Jail.
10:53 AM — Officers responded to the 79900 block of Hwy I I I in reference to a shoplifter in custody. Abel
Adrianzen, 58, of Indio was arrested for burglary and booked into the Indio Jail.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
1:40 PM — Officers responded to the 48000 block of Via Hermosa in reference to a report of a death. An adult female,
70, was found deceased. The investigation is on going.
Sunday. June 12, 2011
3:12 PM -- Officers responded to a burglary in the 42800 block of Washington Street. Carl Carron, 19, of La Quinta
was arrested for possession of stolen property and booked at the Indio Jail. James Hart, 25, of Anaheim was not at the
Ah location and is believed to be in possession of a stolen weapon.
IF
260
11:08 PM --Officers responded to a domestic disturbance in the 52000 block of Avenida Obregon. Gustavo Alonso
Montes, 25, of Indio was arrested for felony spousal battery.
Monday, June 13,2011
7:26 AM -- Officers responded to the 52000 block of Eisenhower Drive in reference to a domestic disturbance. Luis
Mancilla, 50, of La Quinta had physically assaulted his wife. Mancilla was arrested for felony domestic violence and
booked into the Indio Jail.
9:30 AM — Officers were dispatched to the 78600 block of Siena Ct. regarding a theft. Investigation revealed the
suspect, Elsa Torres, 43, has been stealing money and services from the victim, 83, for more than a month.
Tuesday, June 14,2011
7:05 AM -- Officers responded to the 48300 block of Bighorn Dr. in reference to a report of unknown trouble.
Arriving officers found an elderly female in the front yard bleeding from the head. CDF responded and transported
the female, 73, to JFK hospital for treatment. The injury was determined to be accidental.
11:20 AM — SET Team Officers responded to the 78700 block of Bayberry Lane and arrested Charles Hahn, 44, for a
felony drug warrant. Hahn was booked into the Indio Jail.
2:47 PM — SET Team Officers conducted a traffic stop at Jefferson and Avenue 50. John MacKight, 21, of North
Shore ran from the vehicle. After a short foot pursuit he was taken into custody and arrested for possession of a
controlled substance and violation of probation. He was booked into the Indio Jail.
8:34 PM — Officers were dispatched to the 53700 block of Avenida Navarro regarding an animal cruelty incident. The
suspect, a 17 year old juvenile from La Quinta, was seen throwing a cat over a fence. Animal Control Officers
responded and took possession of the cat. The juvenile was released to his parents.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
2:39 PM -- Officers responded to the 78900 block of Highway I I I to a report of a shoplifter in custody. Diana Juarez,
28, of Desert Hot Springs was arrested and booked for shoplifting.
2:43 PM -- Officers responded to a major injury traffic collision inside of the Madison Club. A motorcycle collided
head on with a full sized pick-up truck. The operator of the motorcycle was ejected from his motor cycle and received
serious injuries. He was airlifted to the hospital where he was listed as stable but in critical condition in intensive care.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
6:50 PM -- Officers arrested Shawn Madden, 30, of La Quinta for being under the influence of a controlled substance
during a pedestrian check at Dune Palms Road and Highway 111. Madden was booked into the Indio Jail.
Friday, June 17, 2011
2:45 PM — Officers were dispatched to a report of a bank robbery in the 78400 block of Highway 111. Investigation
revealed a male adult entered the bank, gave a teller a note, and demanded money. The suspect fled the bank on foot.
No weapon was used or seen and nobody was hurt.
4:40 PM -- Officers responded to a report of a fraud in the 49400 block of Eisenhower Drive. Security discovered a
room had been rented with a stolen credit card. Kurt Anthony Livesay, 47, of San Pedro, was arrested for a DUI
warrant. Larry Duran, 44, of San Pedro was arrested for violating a restraining order. Connie Lynn Braden, 43, of San
Pedro was arrested for possession of drug paraphernalia. Livesay, Duran, and Braden were booked into the Indio Jail.
11:30 PM -- Officers investigated a vandalism call in the 52600 block of Avenida Martinez. Officers arrested Nicole
Smith, 25, of La Quinta for felony vandalism. Smith was booked into the Indio Jail.
261
RL
Saturday, June18,2011
2:45 AM -- Officers investigated a possible DUI driver in the area of Calle Tampico and Washington St. Araceli
Quezada, 23, of Indio was arrested for DUI. A female passenger, Adelaida Hernandez, 23, of Coachella was arrested
for public intoxication. Both subjects were transported and booked into the Indio Jail.
9:02 AM -- Officers responded to the 50900 block of Washington Street in reference to a theft and arrested Ronni
Lynn Sheahan, 52, of La Quinta for commercial burglary. Sheahan was booked into the Indio Jail.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
2:35 AM -- Officers arrested Darby Dooda Hanson, 24, of La Quinta for DUI and Tyler Justin Kahan, 29, of La
Quinta for public intoxication during a traffic stop at Eisenhower Drive west of Washington Street. Both Hanson and
Kahan were booked into the Indio Jail.
7:40 AM -- Officers conducted a vehicle stop on Avenida Vallejo and Calle Sonora and arrested Mario Pena
Delafuente, 45, of La Quinta for possession of narcotics. Delafuenta was booked into the Indio Jail.
4:05 PM -- Officers responded to a traffic collision at Avenue 50 and Washington St, involving a vehicle and a
bicyclist. The bicyclist was traveling north on Washington and pulled out in front of the vehicle. The bicyclist was
transported to Desert Hospital with serious injuries. The driver of the vehicle was uninjured.
4:34 PM --Officers were dispatched to the 52100 block of Avenida Carranza regarding a report of a domestic dispute.
Francisco Leyva, 28, of Indio had a no bail warrant for a parole violation. Leyva was arrested and booked at the Indio
Jail.
6:59 PM -- Officers responded to the 52000 block of Avenida Herrera in regards to a runaway juvenile. The juvenile
uphad a no bail warrant and was taken to juvenile hall at the request of Child Protective Services.
9:48 PM -- Investigators responded to a domestic violence call in the 47700 block of Dune Palms. Jorge Romero, 28,
of La Quinta was arrested for felony child abuse.
Monday. June 20, 2011
11:59 PM — SET Team Officers responded to a man with a gun call at Eisenhower Dr. and Calle Sinaloa. Officers
went to the suspect's residence in the 79500 block of Avenue 42, Bermuda Dunes and conducted a parole compliance
check. Officers located a handgun at the location. Russell Sorling, 25, of Bermuda Dunes was arrested for being a
felon in possession of a firearm and possession of ammunition. Tyler Dahhar, 21, of Palm Desert was arrested for
being under the influence of a controlled substance. Both suspects were booked at the Indio Jail.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
12:28 AM -- Officers were dispatched to the 79200 block of Highway I I 1 regarding a theft in progress. Justice
Tausaga, 19, of Palm Desert was arrested and booked for shoplifting.
12:30 AM -- Officers conducted a traffic stop on Washington St. and Simon Drive. Walter C. Morales, 28, of Palm
Desert was arrested for DUI and resisting or delaying a peace officer.
7:05 PM — Officers reported that a missing hiker had been found. Gary Edward Sloan, 67, of Hemet had started a hike
in the southern portion of the La Quinta Cove at about 7:30 a.m. A resident who saw Sloan start his hike noticed
Sloan's car was still parked near the trailhead near Calle Tecate and Vallejo about 2:00 p.m. and became concerned
due to the 110 + degree heat. CHP helicopter flew over the area but didn't find Sloan. Supervising officers called in
Desert Search and Rescue who found Sloan in good health near the Bear Creek Trail, taking shelter in the shade.
262
8:30 PM — SET Team Officers conducted a traffic stop at Highway111 and Simon Drive. The driver, Nicholas
Aeilers, 32, of Coachella was arrested for a parole warrant. He was booked into the Indio Jail.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
No Significant Activity
Thursday, June 23, 2011
1:31 PM -- The Business District Officer arrested Cort Watterson, 37, of Indio at a business in the 78400 block of
block of Highway I I I for panhandling.
Friday, June 24, 2011
No Significant Activity
Saturday, June 25, 2011
No Significant Activity
Sunday, June 26, 2011
2:46 PM -- Officers responded to the 51400 block of Calle Jacumba in regards to a domestic disturbance. Mercedes
Benitez, 27, of Palm Desert was arrested for being under the influence of a stimulant. Benitez was booked at the Indio
Jail.
7:57 PM -- Officers responded to the 49400 block of Eisenhower Dr. in regards to an individual trespassing. Security
had detained Eduardo Espinoza, 22, of Cathedral City for being on the property without permission. Further
investigation revealed Espinoza was in possession of stolen property and marijuana. In addition, Espinoza was found
to be on parole for burglary. Espinoza was arrested for possession of stolen property, trespassing, possession of
marijuana and a parole violation.
9:27 PM — Officers responded to the 78600 block of Vileta Dr. in regards to an attempt theft of a trailer. The trailer
was parked in the driveway of the residence and the victim was alerted to the attempted theft when the trailer alarm
activated. After hearing the alarm the victim found the hitch lock for the trailer had been cut.
Monday, June 27, 2011
3:49 PM — The Business District Officer arrested Marty William Rodriguez, 20, of La Quinta for burglary and check
forgery in the 78-800 block of Hwy 111.
7:30 PM — Officers conducted a traffic stop at Avenida Bermudas and Calle Hildago. Sherry Owens, 60, of Indian
Wells was arrested for DUI. She was booked at the Indio Jail.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
10:15 AM —Officers responded to a report of a missing person in the 78800 block of Zenith. An adult male, 27, of
La Quinta told his mother that he was going to ride his bike and would be back soon. Officer's made contact with
several of the subject's friends who told them that the subject would take off from time to time. One of the friends said
that the subject gave him a letter three weeks ago that stated he was going to Texas. The missing man was entered into
the NCIC system. Officers called the area hospitals and jails without locating the man.
12:11 PM -- Officers responded to a suspicious person call in the 52700 block of Avenida Martinez. A male had
jumped over a wall at a residence. Arriving officers located a juvenile matching the suspicious person and detained
Adft him. Other officers found that a rock had been thrown through a back bedroom window with the window left partially
IV open. The suspect admitted to breaking the window and gaining access.
263
8:00 PM -- La Quinta SET Team Officers served a warrant in the 78700 block of Bayberry Lane and arrested Charles
Hann, 45, of La Quinta for a felony burglary and possession of stolen property warrant. He was booked into the Indio
Jail.
9:33 PM -- La Quinta SET Team Officers conducted a traffic enforcement stop at Jefferson and Avenue 50. Tanya
Fordham, 43, of Indio was arrested for DUI and was booked into the Indio Jail.
11:03 PM — Officers responded to the 43100 block of Palm Royal and arrested Daniel Russell Lipscombe, 20, of La
Quinta for domestic battery.
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
5:33 AM — Officers responded to the 49500 block of Coachella Dr. regarding a sexual battery that had just occurred.
Investigation revealed that a 68 year old female was out for a morning walk when an unidentified male ran up behind
her, knocked her to the ground and sexually assaulted her. The subject then ran away.
7:53 AM — Officers conducted a vehicle check in the La Quinta City Park located at Francis Hack and Avenida
Bermudas. The occupant, Trevor Andrew Guzman, 23, of Palm Springs was arrested and booked for possession of
cocaine and ecstasy capsules.
5:27 PM -- La Quinta SET Team Officers conducted an occupied vehicle check in the 78900 block of Highway 111.
Joseph Martinez, 28, of Desert Hot Springs was arrested for a misdemeanor domestic violence warrant. During a
search incident to arrest Martinez was found to be wearing shorts stolen from a business at the location. He was
booked for the warrant and commercial burglary.
Thursday, June 30, 2011
4:57 AM — Officers conducted a pedestrian check on Desert View and Desert Crest and arrested Andres Rojas, 23, of
La Quints for a felony possession of stolen property warrant.
9:00 AM — Officers conducted a follow-up interview at the Indio Station related to a past residential burglary.
Officers arrested Luis Miguel Granillo, 43, of Desert Hot Springs for possession of stolen property. Additional
burglary charges will be sought against the suspect.
264
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Business District Deputy Report
June 2011
Deputy Tracey Newton
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY
Traffic Citations is
Panhandling Citations 2
Business License Citations 4
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
I investigated an act of vandalism at Dune Palms and Highway 111. A retail location
had been defaced with graffiti. I spoke with the property manager and scheduled an
appointment to discuss options to reduce crime in the business center.
I assisted a patrol deputy with collecting evidence at a vehicle burglary which
occurred at a retail parking lot. Fingerprints were located on the vehicle and submitted to
CAL ID for processing. '
I arrested a subject at a retail store for shoplifting. The subject attempted to leave the
store with several electronic items and was detained by security. The subject, a juvenile,
was issued a citation and released to his mother.
I assisted deputies with a business license violation at a retail center. Three subjects
were contacted at the scene. Two solicitors were found to have their business licenses
revoked (Nu Creation Outreach); the third solicitor did not posses a business license
(Disabled Veterans). All three subjects left the area without incident. La Quinta Code
Enforcement was notified about the violation.
I was dispatched to a theft which occurred at a retail store. A subject fled the store
after removing money from a donation container. La Quinta SET deputies located the
subject at Dune Palms Road and Avenue 48 The subject was positively identified as the
person who fled the store and was arrested for burglary.
While on routine patrol in the business district area, I located a shopping center which
had been vandalized with graffiti in approximately ten different locations. Based on
265
information received from La Quinta SET deputies, I was able to identify a suspect. The
report was submitted to the DA's office for review and filing of the charge of vandalism.
The very next day, I located a second shopping center which had been vandalized with
graffiti in approximately seven different locations. Based on prior information received
from the previous incident, I determined it was the same suspect. The report was also
submitted to the DA's office for review and filing of the charge of vandalism.
I was dispatched to a robbery which occurred at a local bank. During the investigation
a suspect was identified and follow up was conducted. The suspect was located in the
state of Nevada and is currently being held and awaiting extradition back to California.
I was dispatched to a fraud which occurred at a local bank. A suspect was attempting
to cash a fraudulent check. The suspect was detained and transported to the Indio Jail.
I assisted La Quinta Code enforcement with a business license violation at a local
business. Two subjects became uncooperative and left the scene. The two subjects were
contacted at a nearby business and were each issued a citation for soliciting without a
business license by code enforcement. The subjects had a revoked Nu Creation Outreach
license.
BUSINESS/COMMUNITY EVENTS
I attended a retiree ceremony for the City of La Quinta, held at the La Quinta City
Hall.
I attended the Resort Communities Security Association meeting, held at Desert Falls
County Club.
On June 8, 20111 attended a business meeting held at La Casita Restaurant. Several
businesses within the shopping center attended.
OBSERVATIONS:
The month of June has had an increase in business code violations, especially with Nu
Creation Outreach, based out of Oakland, CA. All subjects that have been contacted were
issued citations.
266
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Traffic Services Team Report
June 2011
Traffic Services Team
Sgt. Crounse Cpl. Olson
Dep. Reynolds Dep. Scott Dep. Wiggs C.S.O. Delaney
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
The City of La Quinta has seen an increase of 10.81 % of collisions on public
roadways for the month of June. When all collision activity is counted, the residents and
visitors throughout our city have also seen a decrease of 44% for the month of June, in
comparison to May. There has also been an increase of 22.73% in the number of Hit and
Run collisions for the current year when compared to last year, although, Hit and Run
Collision are down 50% when compared to last month.
Ah
mr Public roadway collision activity continues to be greatest during the weekdays, with
Wednesdays and Fridays accounting for over 50% of the total activity. Our highest
collision activity (66% of those collisions) occurs between the hours of 11:00 am and
5:00 pm.
With our continued focus on occupant restraints, the City of La Quinta has seen a
decrease of 33% in the number of injuries resulting from collisions for the month of June.
Vehicles Failing to Yield the Right -of -Way. Unsafe S eed, and Failing to Obev
Traffic Signs or Signals are the top three primary collision factors (66.67%) for the City
of La Quinta. As a result, La Quinta Traffic Services focus their attention toward
education and enforcement of drivers who violate these traffic laws.
Since it takes a significant period of time to compile data, the monthly Traffic
Collision Statistics and Data Report contain only those reports which have been
completed. Often times collision investigations require further investigative attention and
are forwarded to the La Quinta Traffic Team. Traffic Services dedicates their time to
conducting proactive enforcement while also following up on investigative leads to solve
crimes. As a result, some investigations are pending and current collision data is not
complete. The most current data is attached for informational purposes.
In keeping with all developing trends, traffic services constantly shifts its focus to
meet the leading causes of collisions within the city.
267
Sgt. Alan Norhtrup
Deputy Christian Bloomquist
Deputy Jason Chancellor
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Special Enforcement Team
June 2011
Lt. Jason Husky
Summary of Activitv
Deputy Josh Reinbolz
Deputy Stephen Davis
Deputy Jesus Borrego
e of Activi
# of Incidents
4
T e of
Search Warran
# of Incidents
3ecks/Sto
s
40tations
113
Probation/Parohes
iMisd.
15
Checks
35
Arrest Warrant
626
Arrests/Filin -
16sued
10
Arrests/Filin s
23
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
Members of La Quinta SET responded to a business on Washington Street in La
Quinta in reference to the sexual assault of a female customer. La Quinta SET, along
with La Quinta Patrol Officers, quickly and efficiently set a perimeter and began
searching for the suspect. SET Officers located the suspect, however, the suspect ran
from officers and attempted to evade arrest. Because of the strong presence of patrol
officers and SET members, the suspect was unable hide. The suspect was arrested for
sexual assault and taken to Indio Jail.
La Quinta SET Officers responded to a robbery at the Bank of America in La Quinta.
SET officers worked in cooperation with Indio Station's Investigative Unit with
interviewing several witnesses and conducting follow-up investigations. During the
investigation, video surveillance was recovered. SET members looked at the images of
the bank robber and were able to identify the suspect. The suspect is a known probationer
who lives in the city of La Quinta. During the investigation, a second person of interest
was also identified. This person was seen on video surveillance earlier in the day at a
separate location, along with the main suspect.
Officers from La Quinta SET responded to both of the bank robbery suspect's
locations in the La Quinta Cove area. During the operation, one of the suspects was
gTiant
PMLIJ
AML detained and questioned. During the questioning, the subject was found to be in
IV possession of illegal narcotics. He was arrested and booked into Indio Jail.
La Quinta SET assisted Indio Investigations with the service of a search warrant for
the suspect's residence in the La Quinta Cove. Evidence linking the suspect to the bank
robbery was located. However, the suspect who actually robbed the bank had supposedly
fled the state. Based on the identification made by La Quinta SET, an arrest warrant was
issued for the main suspect. In the last week of June, the suspect was located and arrested
by the FBI in Las Vegas, Nevada.
SET Officers responded to a man with a gun call that occurred in the La Quinta Cove.
Officers identified the suspect who allegedly had been waving a handgun in the air while
driving a vehicle. SET Officers responded to the suspect's residence in Bermuda Dunes.
and conducted a parole compliance check. Officers located the suspect and a handgun at
the location. The suspect was arrested for being a convicted felon in possession of a
firearm and possession of ammunition. A second subject at the location was arrested for
being under the influence of a controlled substance. Both suspects were booked at the
Indio Jail.
Members of the La Quinta SET conducted a follow-up investigation involving a
firearm stolen from a residence in north La Quinta. During the initial investigation, patrol
officers described a person of interest, but were unable to locate or contact the subject.
SET Officers conducted their investigation and identified the subject and discovered he
41 was a probationer who lived in Anaheim, CA. SET Officers coordinated with the Orange
County Probation Office and arranged a probation compliance check. During the
compliance check, the suspect was interviewed and confessed to stealing the firearm and
transporting it to Orange County where he sold the gun. SET Officers worked in
coordination with the Orange County Probation Department and the Anaheim Police
Department and conducted two probation compliance checks and a business check in
effort to recover the firearm. The suspect was subsequently arrested and booked into
Riverside County Robert Presley Detention Center in Riverside, CA. The gun was not
located.
Officers from La Quinta SET were patrolling the Highway 1 I I La Quinta Business
District corridor and conducted an occupied vehicle check in front of Kohl's. During the
vehicle check it was discovered one of the two occupants had an active arrest warrant.
The subject was removed from the vehicle and detained for the warrant. During a search
of the subject, Officers noticed he was wearing several additional items of clothing with
price tags still attached. Further investigation revealed that the subject had just committed
a commercial burglary at the nearby Kohl's. The stolen clothing and additional stolen
property was recovered from the vehicle and returned to Kohl's. The suspect was arrested
for commercial burglary and the active arrest warrant.
La Quinta SET worked in partnership with the La Quinta Motor Unit and La Quinta
School Resource Officers in orchestrating the traffic control and ensuring public safety
Ah during the La Quinta High School Graduation, Summit High School Graduation, and
269
Horizon High School Graduation. During the operation, no major traffic collisions and no
major incidents occurred during the ceremonies.
Officers from La Quinta SET aided the Coachella Valley narcotics Task Force in
serving a search warrant for a residence in the La Quinta Cove area. During the service of
the warrant, evidence was located that linked the suspect to a home invasion robbery in
the city of Indio. Illegal narcotics were also located inside the residence. La Quinta SET
Officers were involved because the particular residence where the search warrant was
being served has been linked to other crimes in the city of La Quinta. La Quinta SET
regularly monitors residences and subjects who are known to be involved in crime and
makes every effort to keep crime out of our city.
Members of the La Quinta SET have contacted several subjects within the city of La
Quinta which have resulted in numerous arrests for narcotic violations, thefts, and
outstanding warrants. La Quinta SET will continue their pro -active and community
oriented policing efforts throughout the city which will result in more arrests of drug
dealers, thieves, and career criminals in order to improve the quality of life for the
residents of La Quinta. This continued hard work by La Quinta SET has kept the crime
rate in La Quinta very low compared to other surrounding cities in the Coachella Valley.
11
?%0
U
Officer R. Smith
La Quinta High School
CITY OF LA QUINTA
School Resource Officer Report
June 2011
Summary of Activi
Type of Activity
Criminal Reports
Number of
Incidents
1
Arrests
1
Y.A.T. Filin s
0
City Park Area Checks
4
Vehicle Checks
18
Pedestrian Checks
15
County Citations
1
Public Assist
4
Investi ations Follow-u
2
District Attorney Filings
1
Home Visits 0
Business Checks 3
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
I was contacted by a school district security agent who advised me that a student
confided in him telling him that the juvenile was in possession of a taser. The agent took
possession of the taser and then provided it to me. I contacted the juvenile who stated
that he received the item from another male, not in attendance at the high school, but he
wanted to get rid of it because he thought he would be in trouble. The juvenile was
arrested for being in possession of the item on school grounds and released to his mother.
The case is pending with the District Attorney's Office.
On Thursday, June 2°d, the 2011 seniors graduated at La Quinta High School. The
graduation proceeded smoothly and there were very few issues from a law enforcement
perspective. My sergeant and I worked with the school to open up the freshman baseball
field to fit the overflow parking which greatly assisted with parking issues that have been
encountered in the past. The traffic plan was well implemented and people appeared
happy with our assistance. We were also able to obtain the assistance of the Post 503
271
Explorer's from our station, many of which are LQHS students as well. They assisted
with the traffic plan and aided security with crowd control at the end of the ceremony.
Overall, we did not have to issue any citations and no one was arrested. All in attendance
made it safely.
272
11
CITY OF LA QUINTA
School Resource Officer
June 2011
Officer D. Alexander
La Quinta Middle School Franklin Elementary School
Truman Elementary School Adams Elementary School
Summary ofActivity
Type of Activity
Number of Incidents
Reports
3
Arrests
3
Business Check
0
District Attomey Filings
2
Traffic Stops
0
Y.A.T. Referrals
0
Home Visits
0
Follow-up Investigations
1
Vehicle Checks
0
Public Assist
10
Pedestrian Checks
4
Traffic Citations
0
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
La Quinta Middle School
During the month of June I arrested three juveniles for the following, vandalism of school property
and misappropriation of lost property. I also conducted an investigation regarding a reported
child endangerment which I later determined to be unfounded.
Adams Elementary
No significant activity to report.
Franklin Elementary
No significant activity to report.
Truman Elementary
No significant activity to report.
273
11
CITY OF LA QUINTA
School Resource Officer Report
June 2011
Officer C. Trueblood
Summit High School Paige Middle School Horizon School
Summary ofActivity
Type of Activity
Number of Incidents
Reports
3
Arrests
I
Assist Other Departments
0
Pedestrian Checks
0
Vehicle Check
4
Area Checks
0
Traffic Citations
I
City Municipal Code Citations
0
Follow-up Investigations
3
Calls for Service
2
SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY
I investigated a report of battery at Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School. A
seventh grade student reported that his math teacher had forcibly pushed him out
of class. The student did not have any visible injuries and no medical attention
was required. The victim stated he and the teacher got into a verbal argument in
class at which time the teacher grabbed him, stood him up, led him to the door
and shoved him out the open door. I issued the teacher a citation with a notice to
appear and released him at the school. I interviewed members of the class that
witnessed the event and they corroborated the statements of the victim. I filed
charges of Child Endangerment against the suspect out of custody.
School ended on June 9, 2011 and after that date all School Resource Officers
went to a patrol position for one week. The other week was spent doing preparation
work and logistical work for the upcoming La Quinta Police Cadet Academy. On
June 27, 2011 the Cadet Academy began and has a nearly full class of 48 cadets at
this time. Some cadets chose to drop out of the academy within the first week and
were replaced with alternate applicants
274
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Business District
Community Service Officer
June 2011
C.S.O. Philip Curia
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY
I have contacted twenty-two business centers in the area of La Quinta representing
Centre La Quinta, Centre Point, Dune Palms Plaza, Dunes Business Park, Gas Stations in
La Quinta, J. Paul Building, Jefferson Plaza, KMS Property Management, La Quinta
Valley Plaza, La Quinta Professional Plaza, One Eleven Shopping Center from Simon
Road to Adams and One Eleven Shopping Center from Simon Road to Washington St.,
The Pavilion at La Quinta, Point Happy, Washington Plaza (Washington St.), Plaza La
do Quinta Shopping Center, Shops on Highway I I I & Washington St., Shops on Calico
Bay Drive, La Quinta Village Shopping Center, Washington Park (Washington St.
Shops), and Washington Plaza (Highway I I I and Adams St.), La Quinta Village
Shopping Area and The Shops on Calle Tampico.
This represents about 292 businesses in the Highway I I I corridor ,Washington Street
and downtown area. There have been several first business meetings that have started in
April and will continue until all the businesses in La Quinta have had their first business
meeting with our officers. We have and will continue to stress the importance at these
meetings for businesses to recognize when there are suspicious circumstances, vehicles
and persons in and around these businesses to contact the La Quinta Police immediately.
At each meeting we are discussing the following topics:
Crime Prevention For Commercial Businesses. What can you do?
Counterfeiting- Do you know what to look for?
Open Forum- An opportunity for the businesses to share their crime prevention
technique and their business needs.
Statistics of crimes taking place in the business community area.
Ah
Several businesses have offered their operation to host many of these meetings.
275
We then ask all the businesses attending to complete a worksheet giving us details
pertaining to their business. We asked them for the name of their business, hours of
operations, manages names and contact telephone numbers as well as a 24 hour contact
number, their alarm response company and what type of camera, alarms they have in
their businesses.
In addition to the worksheet, we ask each business to fill out a business layout of their
operation. Here the businesses describe the entrance and exit doors as well as the location
of rooms around the business. This information together with the worksheet will aid our
department should a potential disaster or other life threatening situations should occur at
that business.
I will continue to contact the remaining businesses in the downtown La Quinta area.
Once all the businesses have had their first meeting, we will start our second set of
meetings, which will consist of training the business owners and staff in how to
recognize a criminal activity and what their role is in helping us fight crime in our
business community. In addition to this training, we will hand out to every business, a
decal which shows that business participates in a " Business Watch Program ". The decal
states the business reports all suspicious activities to their fellow merchants and to the
La Quinta Police Department.
We will begin to set up each Business Community Area with block captains, who will
help with the organization of each business center in the fight against crime.
It is our intention to conduct at least two business meetings in each business
community center as well as continually monitor and patrol the areas of our business
community.
In addition to my time working with the business district, I was asked to teach our
Explorers at the Indio Sheriff Station CPR and First Aid. These young men and women
want to be prepared to save someone's life in the course of their involvement with the
Sheriff Department. I certified eleven members of the Explorer's post on June 22 and
June 29, 2011 in CPR and First Aid through EMS Safety Services Inc. EMS Safety
Services donated the materials and I donated my time to get these Explorers certified.
2l6
Lli
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Community Service Officer Report
June 2011
Patrol C.S.O. Artesia Diaz
Patrol C.S.O. Melinda Verdugo
Traffic Services C.S.O. Bridget Delaney
Business District C.S.O. Philip Curia
Summary of Activitv
Type of Activi
Number of Incidents
Bur lary Investigations
7
Grand Theft Reports
2
PettyTheft Reports
4
Vandalism/Malicious Mischief Reports
7
Traffic Collision Response
17
Vehicle Code or Parking Citations
34
Abandoned Vehicles Tagged/WarningTaggedNVarning
7
Towed Vehicles
0
Lost or Found Property Reports
5
Stolen Vehicle Report
0
Custodial / Non -Custodial Transport
1 g
Miscellaneous Calls
61
11
277
Danese Maldonado
Volunteer Coordinator
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Citizens On Patrol
Community Policing Office
Monthly Volunteer Report
June 2011
Summary of activity
Community PoliCinq Office
Number
Citizens On Patrol
Number
Monthly Volunteer Hours
210
Traffic Control / Collision
0
Hours Y.T.D.
1,046
Business Checks
87
Hours 4/03 to Present
21,070
Community Events
3
CPO Monthly Visits
96
Courtesy Notifications
0
CPO Y.T.D. Visits
595
Miscellaneous
0
CPO Visits 4/03 to Present
17,866
Neighborhood Patrol
46
Vacation Checks
57
Patrol Hours
71.5
Y.T.D. Patrol Hours
572
Hours 7/06 to Present
6,671
I
CA rate for value received for volunteers is $16.24 - 2010 totals to May = $16,264 savings.
Total savings since 2003 = $379,431.
CA rate for value received changed and is now $23.29. Totals since January 2011 = $37,567.00
Total savings since 2003 = $478,601.00
We currently have 12 active office volunteers who staff and maintain the Community
Policing Office in Old Town. These volunteers do a variety of data entry functions as well
as assisting community members who enter the office.
We currently have 10 Citizen on Patrol volunteers serving our community. Two new
Amok applicants have been approved and will begin training in June.
IV
278
Department Report:
LA UNTA PiLICE
Served by the PJverside County Sherirs Depart
Crime Statistics Summary
May -- 2011
Prepared for
u
279
U
9
10
11
12
13
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Crime
Com arison
-- May
CRIME
May
May
YTD 2011
YTD 2010
2011
2010
ATED ASSAULTS
8
6
25
20
RY
38
40
195
203
RY - VEHICLE
31
13
137
88
IC VIOLENCE
F
18
13
77
83
E
0
0
0
1
ICS VIOLATIONS
18
35
111
117
ROBBERY
3
1
22
7
ROBBERY - CAR JACKING
1
0
1
0
SEX CRIME FELONY
1
7
9
21
SEX CRIME MISDEMEANOR
0
1
4
3
SIMPLE ASSAULTS
10
5
45
28
THEFT
59
61
283
321
VEHICLE THEFT
7
4
24
28
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Average Response Time
May 2011
TYPE OF CALL
RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES
NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
EMERGENCY
4.95
4
ROUTINE
9.02
1,369
. Data from Riverside Co. Sheriffs Department Data Warehouse, Average Response Time Report.
w
Crime Distribution Table
May-1 1
% of Total
May-10
% of Total
1
AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS
8
4.12%
6
3.23%
2
BURGLARY
38
19.59%
40
21.51%
3
BURGLARY -VEHICLE
31
15.98%
13
6.99%
4
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
18
9.28%
13
6.99%
5
HOMICIDE
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
6
NARCOTICS VIOLATIONS
18
9.28%
35
18.82%
7
ROBBERY
3
1.550/6
1
0.54%
8
ROBBERY - CAR JACKING
1
0.52%
0
0.000%
9
SEX CRIME FELONY
1
0.52%
7
3.76%
10
SEX CRIME MISDEMEANOR
0
0.00%
1
0.54%
11
SIMPLE ASSAULTS
10
5.15%
5
2.69%
12
THEFT
59
30.41%
61
32.80%
13
VEHICLE THEFT
7
3.61%
4
2.15%
Total
194
95.88%
186
96.77%
CITY OF LA QUINTA
May
2011
Crime Distribution
70
59
60
50
38
40
30
18 18
20
8
10
7
10
—
p
�—
0
0
°,
z
a �a
ma
.gym
m
H�n
K
C)
m
O
a
a
a
y
281
KI
KI
Month to Month Crime Comparison
May
70
5961
60
50
My 01
3840
40
31
May 0110
30
20
13
16
3
18
10
8
31
10
wd
0
"�"'�
"�
m'<
�""
m
n •
m
a'S
S
w�
Year to Date Crime Comparison
May
350
300
250
19303
200
p YTD 2011
150
137
❑ YTD 2010
1117
8
100
—
7783
45
50
0
F
1 10 9 43
�
0
a
o
x
A
282
1
Month to Month Calls for Service Comparison
May 2011
2 May-11
11 May-10
3,000 2,768
2,000 ,4----�-1,3
1,015
-4
1,000
0
Total Non -Criminal Crirrrnal
Year to Date Calls for Service Comparison
January -- May
t7 YTD 2011
v YTD 2010
15,000 11,85
10,000 281�6 502
5,578 >_, taxi
5,000
0 sir
Total Non -Criminal Criminal
283
Department Report 10
City of
La Qu i nta
Fire Department
Quarterly Report
April 1 through June 30, 2011
Presented by: Pete Blakemore
Battalion Chief
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION
John R. Hawkins - Fire Chief
210 West San Jacinto Avenue — Perris, CA 92570
(951)940-6900 —www.rvcfire.org
PROUDLY SERVING THE
UNINCORPORATED AREAS
July 7, 2011
OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AND THE CITIES OF:
Honorable Mayor Adolph and
Members of the City Council
BANNING
City of La Quinta
BEAUMONT
P.O. Box 1504
CALIMESA
La Quinta, CA 92253
CANYON LAKE
Ref: Quarterly Report
COACHELLA
It is my pleasure to provide you with the second Quarterly Fire Department Report for 2011.
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
This report summarizes activities and responses made by the Riverside County Fire
EASTVALE
Department within the City of La Quinta.
INDIAN WELLS
From April 1 through June.30, 2011, units responded to a total of 664 calls for service
INDIO
within the City of La Quints. These responses are broken down as follows:
JURUPAVALLEY
LAKE ELSINORE
• Medical Aids 514
• False Alarms 51
LA QUINTA
• Structure Fires 7
MENIFEE
Wildland Fires 3
MORENO VALLEY
• Rescues (accidents, entrapments) 34
• Other Fires (vehicle, refuse, etc.) 11
PALM DESERT
• Public Service Assists 37
PERRIS
(Non -emergency assistance)
RANCHO MIRAGE
• Fire Menace Standby 7
(Fuel spill, gas leak etc.)
RUBDOUX CSD
SAN JACINTO
By comparison, there were a total 712 calls for service during the same period of time in
2010. This equates to a decrease of approximately 6.8 % in calls for service.
TEMECULA
WILDOMAR
Below is a summary of various activities that occurred in the City during the second quarter
of 2011.
BOARD OF • SPECIAL EVENTS
SUPERVISORS: • On April 23, 2011, Fire Explorers from the La Quints Post participated in their
BOB BUSTER first fire muster. This event was hosted by the Murrieta Fire Explorers. This
DISTRICT I event is based on firefighting methods both old and new. One of the key
JOHNTAVAGLIONE benefits of participating in this event is building on Teamwork of the Fire
DISTRICT 2 Explorers.
JEFF STONE
DISTRICT 3 • On April 27, 2011 La Quinta Firefighters participated in 31 Cent scoop night at
JOHN BENOIT the La Quinta Baskin -Robbins store. This event is an annual event held at
DISTRICT4 Baskin -Robbins ice Cream parlors nationwide. The Baskin -Robbins
MARION ASHLEY Corporation donates $100,000 to the Nation Fallen Firefighters Foundation
DISTRICT 5 during this event. This Foundation assists families of fallen firefighters.
285
School kids enjoy
the end of year water
day
Fire Extinguisher
training to a local
business
Truck Company
personnel performing
vertical ventilation
• On April 30, 2011, La Quinta Firefighters assisted with the Annual Muscular
Dystrophy Association "Fill the Boot" event. In this event, Firefighters with the
assistance of the La Quinta Kohl's store were on hand to accept the gracious
donations of La Quinta residents to support the MDA and all of their efforts.
June 7, 2011 Local elementary schools enjoy the annual water day put on by local
Firefighters.
• Cal -FIRE crews from the Oak Glen Conservation camp provided clean up services to
the city. Over a period of 5 days, these Firefighting crews worked with City staff to
clean up the old dump site at the top of Cove. Their efforts removed several tons of
trash that has been dumped years ago. This is another one of the benefits of the
Regional Fire Protection delivery system that the city enjoys.
• FIRE PREVENTION / PUBLIC EDUCATION
• May 31, 2011 La Quinta Firefighters provided fire extinguisher training to staff at
Embassy Suites La Quinta.
• EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
• April 14, 2011: Single Family dwelling structure fire 78000 block Via Carmel
(Rancho La Quinta Country Club). Fire detector activation and monitoring system
provided early detection and response. Approximately loss of $ 10,000 and a save of
$1 million.
• April 16, 2011: Single Family fire 80000 block Calle Azul. Fire confined to laundry
room area with smoke damage throughout. Approximate loss of $ 20,000 and a save
of $ 200,000
• May 2, 2011: Single family fire (unoccupied) 57000 block Calle Azul. This was the
second fire to the same residence in two months. Cause is under investigation.
• June 15, 2011: Single Family fire 53000 block Eisenhower Dr. Fire confined to attic
above master bedroom. A family of 7 was displaced as a result of this fire. American
Red Cross provided assistance to the family. Approximate loss of $ 53,000 and a save
of $ 250, 000.
Respectfully Submitted,
John Hawkins
County Fire Chief
By.?IV-----
Pete Blakemore Battalion Chief
"i•
La Quinta City
Fire Responses
Quarterly Totals
:al Emergencies
® False Alarms
® Structure Fire
IM Wildland Fires
❑ Rescues .
® Other Fires
® Public Service Assists
® Fire Menace Standby
April
May
June
Totals
Medical Emergencies
193
137
184
514
False Alarms
19
17
15
51
Structure Fire
1
2
4
7
Wildland Fires
0
1
2
3
Rescues
18
7
9
34
Other Fires
3
1 4
1 4
11
Public Service Assists
1 13
7
17
37
Fire Menace Standby
4
1
2
7
TOTALSI
261
1 176
237
1 664
287
m
50
40
30
20
10
La Quinta City
Fire Responses
Quarterly Totals
Quarterly Comparisons
02010 ■2011
AN
e9 s
e�>b
�Os
41.
s 2� ea
�9sssf s�'aby
s
Second Quarter
2010
2011
Medical Emergencies
512
514
False Alarms
90
51
Structure Fire
6
7
Wildland Fires
2
3
Rescues
41
34
Other Fires
14
1 11
Public Service Assists
30
37
Fire Menace Standby
17
7
TOTALS
712
664
7wnm 1
2A8
-
!IL
20
_
79
0
}
)2
0
■-
z
! §
-
■
�
§
�
�$
«
k
f
%
k
�
*
B
�
�
�
~
k
k
�
J
�
�
K
.
�,
.�
|§
)!
t
o]
\_
/J
2f
�g
o/
!W
!§
�§
§,W
E
mE
§E
§E
289
LK elm, I Z,=
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Tom Genovese, City Manage
FROM: Les Johnson, Planning Director�j%L/
DATE: July 19, 2011 (/
SUBJECT: Changes to the Recommended Conditions of Approval -
Site Development Permit (SDP) 2003-762, Amendment 1
The recommended conditions of approval for Site Development Permit 2003-762
Amendment 1 distributed as part of the July 19 City Council Report did not include
three changes. These changes were requested by the applicant, drafted by the
Public Works Department, and adopted by the Planning Commission at their
meeting of June 28, 2011. Therefore, please consider the following as part of the
Planning Commission recommendation for SDP 2003-763, Amendment 1:
1) Replace Condition 52 in its entirety in the SDP 2003-762 Amendment 1
Recommended Conditions of Approval and replace it with the following:
"52. If permitted by CVWD and the City Engineer, when an applicant
proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the La Quinta
Evacuation Channel, the applicant shall execute an indemnification
instrument as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Additionally,
the applicant shall pay for all costs of sampling and testing associated with
the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the
City's NPDES Permit or other City or area -wide pollution prevention program,
and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such
discharge. The applicant is required to construct required discharge
treatment Best Management Practice facilities per the NPDES Permit
Supplement A but at a minimum shall install a CDS Unit or equal system as
approved by the City Engineer. The indemnification shall be executed and
furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or
building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators,
assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative parcel
map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded
for public use. If such discharge is approved for this development, the
v 200
applicant shall make provisions for meeting these obligations. The 100-year
storm water hydraulic grade line shall be at elevation 48 feet or as
determined by CVWD and the City Engineer.
Additionally, the applicant shall submit verification to the City of CVWD
acceptance of the proposed discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly,
into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel with the initial submittal of storm
drain improvement plans.
2► Replace Condition 25 A 1) g) in its entirety of the SDP 2003-762 Amendment 1
Recommended Conditions of Approval and replace it with the following:
"g) Establish a Class II Level II benchmark in the Washington Street right
of way and file a record of the benchmark with the County of Riverside."
3) Replace Condition 25 A 2) d) in its entirety of the SDP 2003-762 Amendment 1
Recommended Conditions of Approval and replace it with the following:
"d) A 12-foot wide raised landscaped median plus variable width as
needed along the entire project boundary to accommodate a left turn lane for
the eastbound Avenue 50 traffic into the project entry on the north side and
for dual left turn lanes for westbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of
Washington Street and Avenue 50. Interim and ultimate improvements shall
be as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall be responsible for
50% of the cost to design and construct said raised landscaped median. "
" 291
�T
F
U
OF'r1'9
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: July 1 9, 201 1
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of
Resolutions Approving an Extension of Time and
Amended Plans to Develop La Paloma, a 208-unit
Senior Living Community Located at the Northeast
Corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50.
Applicant: WSL La Quinta, LLC.
RECOMMENDATION:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION: _
PUBLIC HEARING: f
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment
1, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; and,
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2003-762
Extension 4, and Site Development Permit 2003-762 Amendment 1, subject to the
attached Findings and Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Zoning:
Medium High Density Residential (RMH)
General Plan Designation:
Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
4." , 292
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses:
North: Medium Density Residential (RM) — Existing Residential Community
South: Medium Density Residential (RM) — Vacant, Un-entitled Land
East: Major Community Facilities (MC) — La Quinta Sports Complex
West: Low Density Residential (RQ — Existing Residential Community
Environmental Consideration:
The City of La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this request has been
previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2003-470 which
was prepared for Specific Plan 2004-071, which was certified on December 23, 2004.
No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the
preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code
Section 21166. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is necessary for this
action.
General Background:
The La Paloma senior living community was originally reviewed and approved by the La
Quinta City Council in 2004. The original project encompassed both the northeast and
southeast corners of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and included multiple
entitlements, including: a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2003-074), a Site
Development Permit (SDP 2003-762), a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2003-091),
Zone Change (ZC 2003-1 12), and a Specific Plan (SP 2004-071) .
At the time of the first time extension request in 2007, the portion of the project area
south of Avenue 50 was removed from the project. The permits associated with the
southeast corner have expired. A second time extension request was approved on
October 7, 2008. A third extension request was approved on January 19, 2010,
extending the life of the site development permit to September 18, 2010. On July 6,
2010, the applicant(the new property owner/developer) submitted the subject
applications to amend Specific Plan 2004-071 and Site Development Permit 2003-
762. The amended plans include a revised architectural style, site design, landscaping,
and business model. The applicant submitted a fourth time extension on September
14, 2010.
Project Overview:
The applicant is requesting consideration of revised plans for La Paloma, a 208-unit
» 293
full -service senior living community located on the northeast corner of Washington
Street and Avenue 50 (Attachment 1, Sheet T). Located directly to the north of the
approximately 14-acre project site is an existing single-family residential neighborhood.
Another existing single-family residential neighborhood is located to the west of the
project site, across Washington Street. Vacant, unentitled land is located to the south
of the project site, across Avenue 50. The La Quinta Sports Complex is located east
of the project site, on the other side of the approximately 240-foot wide La Quinta
Storm Water Evacuation Channel
La Paloma is intended to be an age -restricted residential setting where housing, 24-
hour supervision, and basic/personal care and health -related services are provided. The
community will offer programs and services such as dining, housekeeping, and
laundry, as well as on -site social and recreational activities. A variety of on -site
amenities will be provided to residents. Outdoor amenities include a pool, putting
course, dog park, and gardening areas. Indoor amenities include a library, computer
center, activity rooms, salon, and fitness center. Daily scheduled and on -call
transportation services to local dining, shopping, and appointments will also be made
available for residents.
The previously -approved project consisted of 216 independent and assisted living units
with 18 dementia care and 20 skilled nursing beds within multiple buildings situated on
two parcels. The new configuration of the La Paloma community consists of a main
building which contains 117 independent living, 54 assisted living, and 17
Alzheimer/dementia units. Along the perimeter of the project site are 20 detached
cottage units (Attachment 1, Sheet C-1).
The two-story main building has the following characteristics (Attachment 1, Sheet
Al):
• One -bed and two -bed Assisted Living and Alzheimer/dementia units
• One -bed, two -bed, and one/two-bed+den Independent Living units
• Units that include kitchens, bathrooms, and covered patios
• Community dining areas, exercise rooms, theater, and activity rooms
The 20 one-story cottage units have the following characteristics (Attachment 1,
Sheet A19 - A21):
• Two -bedroom and two-bedroom+den units
• Great rooms, kitchens, laundry rooms, and covered patios
• Two -car garages .
Architectural Design:
Included with this proposal are architectural plans for the main building and cottage
units, which have been designed to reflect a Desert Contemporary theme (Attachment
1, Sheet A3 — A6). This includes architectural elements such as the use of stucco as
the primary exterior building material, the use of flat roofing, stacked stone, metal
awnings, and incorporating shades of tan, gold, gray, and blue. Additionally,
balconies, shade structures, and other design elements provide architectural
articulation to the various building facades.
The main building incorporates varying rooflines, with the height of the building, not
including the uninhabitable tower feature, averaging approximately 25 feet in height at
its highest ridgelines (Attachment 1, Sheet A3). The uninhabitable tower is an
approximately 1 1-foot tall architectural projection, which results in a maximum
structure height of 36 feet. Including all units, interior circulation areas, and ancillary
uses, the main building for La Paloma totals approximately 306,000 square feet
(Attachment 1, Sheet T).
The height of the cottage units, at the highest roof ridgeline, is approximately 12'-6"
(Attachment 1, Sheet Al — A21). The square footage of each of the three cottage
floor plans ranges from approximately 1,650 square feet to 1,720 square feet
(Attachment 1, Sheet T).
Included with this proposal are plans for various common areas throughout the La
Paloma site (Attachment 1, Sheet L-1.00). These areas, primarily courtyards within
the main building, include a shaded swimming pool, bocce ball court, outdoor dance
floor, putting green, active -use turf areas, and numerous gardens, fountains, and shade
structures.
Site Design:
There are two access points identified for the proposed La Paloma community
(Attachment 1, Sheet A-2). Access from the west will be from a driveway on
Washington Street. This access will serve as the primary access point for the
vehicular entry courtyard, drop-off area, and main.lobby. Access from the south will
be from a driveway on Avenue 50. This access will serve as the primary access for
residents, employees, and delivery and service vehicles. The Washington Street
access consists of right -in, right -out turning movements, while the Avenue 50 access
point will allow left -in, right -in, and right -out turning movements, with left -out
movements prohibited.
Vehicular circulation within the La Paloma community consists of a singular two-way
drive aisle that meanders around the perimeter of the property, surrounding the main
building (Attachment 1, Sheet A-2). The majority of parking stalls for the project are
located along this drive aisle, as well as access to the 20 cottage units and the
loading/unloading area for the main building. A total of 246 parking spaces are
proposed, including one bus space, eight ADA-accessible spaces, two covered ADA-
.�M 295
accessible spaces, two ADA-accessible van spaces, and 113 covered parking spaces.
The illuminated steel carport structures are approximately 9'-6" in height, and will be
painted to match the buildings (Attachment 1, Sheet A3).
The applicant is also proposing landscape lighting at various locations throughout the
project site (Attachment 1, Sheet L-7.00 - L-7.04). Up -lighting of the trees around
the project site are to be done with canopy tree accent lights and palm tree accent
lights. Walkway lights are to be placed along the numerous pedestrian walking paths
throughout the site. Wall -washer lighting fixtures will also be strategically placed on
walls throughout the site. The main vehicular drive aisle and parking areas are
proposed to be lit with 18-foot tall pole lights (Attachment 1, Sheet L-7.02). The
parking lamps are High -intensity Discharge LED lamps that are shielded and directed
downward.
The applicant also proposes multiple water features (Attachment 1„ Sheet L-1.04).
One feature is proposed to be placed within the planter located in the center of the
main entrance vehicular courtyard. Other features are located within the community
courtyard areas and also along the drive aisle. The features are all similar,
incorporating a cascading stone -veneered fountain and a concealed basin covered with
pebbles.
Landscaping:
Landscaping throughout the project site consists of primarily desert and other low- to
moderate -water use plants (Attachment 1, Sheet L-5.00 - L-5.04). Mostly utilized
around the buildings are various trees and shrubs, with minimal use of turf, which has
been limited to two active use lawn areas (Attachment 1, Sheet L-1.00). The
proposed tree palette includes Acacia, Citrus, African Sumacs, as well as Date Palms
and Mediterranean and California Fan Palms. The shrub palette includes Agave, Yucca,
Birds of Paradise, and Lantana, among others (Attachment 1, Sheet L-5.02).
The landscaped areas that run along Washington Street and Avenue 50 are proposed
to be landscaped with numerous trees, shrubs, and groundcover (minimum 24 box
trees, minimum 2.5 caliper size measured six inches above grade; minimum 5 gallon
shrubs/groundcover) (Attachment 1, Sheet L-1.01 - L-1.02). A meandering sidewalk
runs throughout the landscaped area along Washington Street and Avenue 50, with
pedestrian access into the project located at the vehicular access points.
The project perimeter also incorporates a wall/pilaster combination screen wall
(Attachment 1, Sheet L-1.04). The wall will be approximately 6'-8" in height, and
consists of a cement plaster finished wall with stone veneer accent pilasters. Each
pilaster also includes a hooded down -light bar. Along the western property line, the
wall construction will be combined with landscaped berms. A uniform perimeter
masonry wall with no pilasters will be constructed along the northern property line.
„p 296
Along the east property line, abutting the La Quinta Storm Water Evacuation Channel,
a low flood control wall is proposed to be constructed.
Specific Plan Amendment:
The applicant has proposed a Specific Plan Amendment (Attachment 2). This
represents the first amendment to the original La Paloma Specific Plan, and includes
detailed development principles and design guidelines in order to develop the
community as proposed. The Specific Plan Amendment also includes the removal of
the parcel on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 from the
proposed La Paloma development plans, and details a number of deviations from La
Quinta Municipal Code standards.
The proposed amended Specific Plan proposes the following deviations from the La
Quinta Municipal Code (Attachment 2, Page 27):
Le' Qtdlltd 341WCIPdi Salo
to Paloma : :
i G�#eId ment5tarlderd;
DeveM mettttafitl�'d.
12 feet
Rear.�,etbaek..
15 feet
(building average no less than 15 feet
C�arag5e#6 adt
20 feet
5 feet or less
"
20 feet or more
Equivalent Unit Net Density:
'
12 du/acre
2.85 persons/unit
.Unit Iswe '
750 square feet
675 square feet
"
Strpctuw4lidghi
28 feet
36 feet
.
for maximum 40' x 40' tower element
3 feet
5 feet
Aficttttegtural M4CtionS
above maximum structure height
above maximum structure hei ht
,Pat'k�tglxr#.Geigtti
All units are within 100 feet
No Standard
Of the nearest guest space
Vehicular directional signs
Vehicular directional signs
8
Maximum Area: 3 square feet
Maximum Area: 6.8 square feet
Using an Equivalent Unit basis for determining the project density, the maximum resident population based on available beds is 261
persons and the maximum staff shift is 52. Using the City standard of 2.85 persons per single-family home, the equivalent density is 110
........ ,..72c—imh.ro
Furthermore, the proposed amended Specific Plan removes the land uses "Restricted
Senior Housing" and "Licensed Memory Care Facility" from "Permitted Use —
Conditional Use Permit" and adds them to "Residential Permitted Uses" (Attachment 2,
Page 25). This ties the uses within La Paloma to the Specific Plan, and eliminates the
need to maintain a Conditional Use Permit for the property.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission considered these requests at its meetings of June 14, 2011
a., 297
and June 28, 2011 (Attachment 3). At the June 14 public hearing, the applicant
submitted a letter to staff outlining objections to eight of the recommended conditions
of approval. These objections primarily involved timing of permit expiration, future
street dedications, establishment of benchmarks, turning movements, and drainage.
The public hearing was continued to the June 28 Planning Commission meeting in
order to allow staff to address the objections. Prior to the June 28 meeting, the
applicant collaborated with the Planning, Public Works, and Fire Departments regarding
the requested changes, and the attached recommended conditions of approval were
revised to reflect these discussions.
At the June 28 public hearing, the discussion points primarily focused on the
recommended conditions of approval, particularly street improvements and the
relationship with the property owner to the south of Avenue 50. Also, the potential
allowance of a U-turn on Washington Street at Avenue 50 was discussed, as well as
the use and viability of the water feature located within the main entrance vehicular
courtyard.
On a 4-0 vote, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of
the Specific Plan Amendment and Site Development Permit Extension and
Amendment, with two added conditions of approval (nos. 116 and 1 17) regarding the
removal of the main entrance water feature and requirement for an updated plant
palette containing more frequent use of Colorado Desert native plants.
Neighborhood Meeting
On June 1, 2011, the applicant and the development team for La Paloma presented
their proposal at a neighborhood meeting. Notices for the informational meeting were
sent out to properties within 500 feet of the La Paloma property (Attachment 4). Two
people showed up to the meeting. Both attendees were representatives of the
property on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. The Planning
Department has not received any written or verbal comments regarding the proposed
project.
Public Notice
This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 8, 2011, and mailed
to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been
received from adjacent property owners. Any written. comments received will be
handed out at the City Council hearing.
SB-18 Native American Tribal Consultation
298
As per SB-18 (2004) consultation requirements, information regarding the proposed
Specific Plan was forwarded to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List
provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Staff has followed up with all
Tribes requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for
monitoring in the Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The Findings needed to approve a time extension to the Site Development Permit and
amendments to the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit can be made as noted
in the attached Resolutions.
The alternatives available to the City Council include:
1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2004-071
Amendment 1, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of
Approval; and,
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development
Permit 2003-762 Extension 4, and Site Development Permit 2003-762
Amendment 1, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of
Approval; or
2. Do not adopt Resolutions of the City Council approving the time
extensions; or
3. Provide staff with alternative direction.
, Planning Director
Approved for submission by:
( 11-� / A eKv
Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
Attachments: 1. La Paloma Site Development Permit Packet
2. La Paloma Specific Plan
3. Minutes of June 14, 2011 and June 28, 2011
» 299
Planning Commission hearings
4. Neighborhood Meeting notice
3 0.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2011-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN
2004-071 AMENDMENT 1 FOR LA PALOMA, LOCATED
ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON
STREET AND AVENUE 50
CASE: SPECIFIC PLAN 2004-071 AMENDMENT 1
APPLICANT: WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on
the 1 g`" day of July, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request
by WSL La Quinta, LLC for approval of an amendment to the existing La Paloma
Specific Plan in order to accommodate plans for a 208-unit senior living community
located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more
particularly described as:
APN: 646-070-016
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California did, on the 28th day of June, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing,
as continued from the regularly -scheduled Public Hearing on June 14, 2011, to
consider a recommendation on said Specific Plan Amendment and, after hearing
and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission
Resolution 201 1-006, recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan
2004-071 Amendment 1; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice
in The Desert Sun newspaper on ,July 8, 2011 as prescribed by the Municipal
Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500
feet of the site; and,
WHEREAS, per SB-18 consultation requirements, the Planning
Department has forwarded information regarding the proposed amended Specific
Plan to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the
Native American Heritage Commission and has followed up with all Tribes
requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for
monitoring in the Conditions of Approval; and,
WHEREAS, the La Quinta Planning Department has determined that
this request has been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental
Assessment 2003-470 which was prepared for Specific Plan 2004-071, which was
certified on December 23, 2004. No changed circumstances or conditions are
M 301
City Council Resolution 2011-
Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 2
proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21 166; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section
9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan
Amendment:
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed Specific Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and
policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the design, height, scale and
mass of the buildings within the community are compatible with the goals
and policies of the General Plan Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
Land Use designation.
2. Public Welfare
Approval of the proposed specific plan amendment will not create
conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general
welfare as Environmental Assessment 2003-470 was prepared, and
certification of the Environmental Assessment is in compliance with
CEQA requirements.
3. Land Use Compatibility
The proposed Specific Plan amendment incorporates land uses that are
compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The design and density
regulations specified in the Specific Plan amendment for residential and
related recreational facilities are compatible with the existing single-family
homes located near the specific plan area and on surrounding properties.
4. Property Suitability
The uses permitted in the specific plan amendment, including age -
restricted residences and common areas, are suitable and appropriate for
the subject property in that the community is surrounded by similar
existing uses such as single-family homes. The current specific plan area
is served without adverse impact by all necessary public services and
utilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
M 332
City Council Resolution 2011-
Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 3
1 . That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City
Council in this case; and,
2. That the City Council does hereby approve Specific Plan 2004-071
Amendment 1 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 1 g`h day of July, 2011, by the following
vote, to wit:
Uvi*51
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Veronica J. Montecino, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney
Don Adolph, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
.'Q 303
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SPECIFIC PLAN 2004-071 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta
("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding
to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan Amendment.
The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and
shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment 1 shall be developed in compliance with
these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any
conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of SP 2004-0071
Amendment 1, these conditions shall take precedence.
3. Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment 1 shall comply with all applicable conditions
and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals:
Site Development Permit 2003-762 Amendment 1
In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of
these approvals, the Planning Director shall determine precedence.
4. Within 30 days of City Council approval, applicant shall provide five copies of the
Final Specific Plan document, as amended by this action, to the Planning
Department. The Final Specific Plan shall include all text and graphics except as
amended by this action, all amendments per this action, and correction of, any
typographical errors, internal document inconsistencies, and other amendments
deemed necessary by the Planning Director.
304
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762, TIME EXTENSION 4
AND AMENDMENT 1, INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL, SITE,
AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR LA PALOMA
CASES: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762
EXTENSION 4 AND AMENDMENT 1
APPLICANT: WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on
the 1 gth day of July, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request
by WSL La Quinta, LLC for approval of a fourth extension of time and an
amendment to architectural, site, and landscaping plans for a 208-unit senior living
community located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50,
more particularly described as:
APN: 646-070-016
WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice
in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 8, 2011 as prescribed by the Municipal
Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500
feet of the site; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California did, on the 28th day of June, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing,
as continued from the regularly -scheduled Public Hearing on June 14, 2011, to
consider a recommendation on said Site Development Permit Extension and
Amendment, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did
adopt Planning Commission Resolution 201 1-007, recommending to the City
Council approval of Site Development Permit 2003-762 Extension 4 and
Amendment 1; and,
WHEREAS, the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee of the
City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 151 day of June, 2011, hold a public
meeting to review and discuss architecture, site, and landscape plans, the minutes
of said meeting were included in the staff report for consideration by the Planning
Commission; and,
.�R 305
City Council Resolution 2011-
Site Development Permit 2003-762, Extension 4, Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 2
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section
9,210.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site
Development Permit Extension and Amendment:
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the La Quinta
General Plan, as it proposes a multi -unit age -restricted residential
community, which is General Plan -designated for MHDR (Medium High
Density Residential) development.
2. Consistency with the Zoning Code and La Paloma Specific Plan
The proposed structures, as conditioned, are consistent with the
development standards of the City's Zoning Code and the La Paloma
Specific Plan, in terms of architectural style, building height, building
mass, and landscaping. The community is consistent with the La Quinta
Zoning Map, as it proposes a multi -unit age -restricted residential
community which is General Plan -designated for MHDR (Medium High
Density Residential) development. The site development permit has been
conditioned to ensure compliance with the zoning standards of the MHDR
district, and other supplemental standards as established in Title 9 of the
La Quinta Municipal Code and the La Paloma Specific Plan.
3. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this request has
been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment
2003-470 which was prepared for Specific Plan 2004-071, which was
certified on December 23, 2004. No changed circumstances or
conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of
subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code
Section 21166.
4. Architectural Design
The architectural design aspects of the proposed La Paloma community
provide interest through use of varied roof elements, enhanced building
and facade treatments, and other design details which will be compatible
with, and not detrimental to, surrounding development, and with the
overall design quality prevalent in the City.
396
City Council Resolution 2011-
Site Development Permit 2003-762, Extension 4, Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 3
5. Site Design
The site design aspects of the proposed La Paloma community, as
conditioned, will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, surrounding
development, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City, in
terms of interior circulation, pedestrian access, and other architectural
site design elements such as scale, mass, and appearance. The main
building and cottage units are properly sized with regards to height and
floor area, and are situated at engineer -approved locations with regards to
vehicular and pedestrian access. Furthermore, the visual impact of the
two-story main building is minimized from view from the existing
residential neighborhood to the north as the two-story portion of the main
building is located a minimum of 75 feet from existing single-family
homes on the south side of Saguaro Road, and the highest part of the
main building, the uninhabited tower feature, is set back over 150-feet
from the northern property line.
6. Landscape Design
The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and
plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics
established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. Additionally, the
assorted species of plants, which are taken from the approved plant list in
the La Paloma Specific Plan, provide diversity and add character to the
proposed community. The project landscaping for the proposed
community, as conditioned, shall unify and enhance visual continuity of
the proposed community with the surrounding development. Landscape
improvements are designed and sized to provide visual appeal. The
permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species
to blend with the building architecture.
7. Time Extension
The applicant has been diligently working on amending the previously -
granted entitlement in an effort. to improve compatibility with existing
surrounding development, improve architectural quality, enhance project
hydrology, as well as improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Due
to the extent of work necessary to prepare plans in accordance with the
proposed amendments, a two-year extension from the date of
amendment approval is identified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, as follows:
••a 307
City Council Resolution 2011-
Site Development Permit 2003-762, Extension 4, Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 4
1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City
Council in this case; and,
2. That the City Council does hereby approve Site Development Permit
2003-762 Extension 4, granting a two-year time extension to July 19,
2013, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval; and
3. That the City Council does hereby approve Site Development Permit
2003-762 Amendment 1 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution,
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 19th day of July, 2011, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Veronica J. Montecino, CMC, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
(Seal)
Don Adolph, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
.a 3�g
City Council Resolution 2011-
Site Development Permit 2003-762, Extension 4. Amendment 1
WSL La Quints, LLC
Page 5
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney
.� 309
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
GENERAL
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta
("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding
to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit.
The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and
shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with the requirements and standards
of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"),
and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC").
The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site
at www.la-quinta.org.
3. The Site Development Permit shall be expire two years from the date of City
Council approval (July 19, 2013), and shall become null and void in accordance
with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.210.020, unless a building permit has
been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080.
4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City,
the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the
following agencies, if required:
• Riverside County Fire Marshal
• Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works
Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit)
• Planning Department
• Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department
• Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD)
• Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)
• Imperial Irrigation District (IID) p 310
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA O.UINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
• California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)
State Water Resources Control Board
• SunLine Transit Agency (SUNLINE)
• South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD)
The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances
from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of
improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when
submitting those improvements plans for City approval.
5. A California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who
then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's
("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and
Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number, prior to the issuance of a grading
or building permit by the City.
6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES r
discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 at seq. (Stormwater Management and
Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County
Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board —
Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2008-0001 and the State Water
Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-
00 1 4-DWQ.
A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land
that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1)
acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses
more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a
Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water
Resources Control Board.
The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater
Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for
use in their SWPPP preparation.
B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for
inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance
of all improvements by the City.
311 _
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best
Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)):
1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control).
2) Temporary Sediment Control.
3) Wind Erosion Control.
4) Tracking Control
5) Non -Storm Water Management.
6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control.
E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of
project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by
the City Council
7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Infrastructure Fee Program and Development Impact Fee program in effect at the
time of issuance of building permit(s).
8. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for
any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically
identified in the following conditions of approval.
9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the
invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to
review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these
conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or
instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This
obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and
Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the
Conditions of Approval.
10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the
invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering
and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or
instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time
noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such
payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
PROPERTY RIGHTS
11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements
and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of
the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to
dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for
maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements:
12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals
from the master developer or the HOA over easements and other property rights
necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development
not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that
access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master
development.
13. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights -of -way in
conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific
plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer.
14. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development
include:
A. PUBLIC STREETS
1) Washington Street (Major Arterial, 120' ROW) - The standard 60
feet from the centerline of Washington Street for a total 120-foot
ultimate developed right of way except for:
Additional right-of-way is required on Washington Street north of
Avenue 50 to provide for the realignment of Washington Street to
accommodate the dual left turn lanes for southbound Washington
Street to eastbound Avenue 50 as approved by the City Engineer.
A. An additional variable right of way dedication for a
deceleration/right turn only lane and bus turnout at the
proposed primary project entry measured seventy-six feet (76')
east of the centerline of Washington Street and length as
conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
(Condition of Approval No. 23A(1)(b)1.
2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial, Option B 100' ROW) - The standard 50
feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 for a total 100-foot ultimate 313
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
developed right of way except for:
A. An additional right of way dedication of 10 feet for a right turn
only lane at the Avenue 50 intersection with Washington
Street (a total of sixty feet (60') north of the centerline of
Avenue 50) and length as conditioned under STREET AND
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS (Condition of Approval No.
23A(2)(a)).
15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and
left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved
construction plans.
Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall ,include in the submittal packet
containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street
geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the following design
aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane
widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The
geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering
studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and
auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project
and the associated landscape setback requirement.
16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-
of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to
approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of-way, the applicant shall
grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City.
17. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights -
of -way as follows:
A. Washington Street (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L.
B. Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial) — A minimum 20-foot from the R/W-P/L.
The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall
design is approved.
The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to,
remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes.
__314-
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks,
the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on
the Final Map.
18. At locations where the onsite finished grade adjacent to the landscaped setback
lot has an elevation differential with respect to the arterial street top of curb
exceeding 11.0 feet, the applicant shall comply with, and accommodate, the
maximum slope gradients in the parkway/setback area and meandering sidewalk
requirements by either: 1) increasing the landscape setback size as needed, or 2)
installing retaining walls between the sidewalk and the back of the landscaped
area as needed.
19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the
placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox
clusters, park lands, and common areas.
20. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street and Avenue 50 from lots with
frontage along Washington Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those
access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise
conditioned in these conditions of approval.
21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as
appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading,
retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur.
22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any
portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development
Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer.
STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060
(Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100
(Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section
13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed.
24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will
convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and
residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is
approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a
minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to
standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 3 15
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with
the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.)
A. OFF -SITE STREETS
1) Washington Street (Major Arterial; 120' R/W):
Widen the east side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the project
boundary to its ultimate width on the east side as specified in the General
Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or
reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and
convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban
arterial design standard. The east curb face shall be located fifty-one feet
(51') east of the centerline, except at locations where additional street
width is needed to accommodate:
a) The applicant shall construct a concrete bus stop pad
equipped with night lighting, bench, and trash receptacle north
of the primary entry drive on Washington Street as approved
by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. Bus turnout
shall be provided if required by SunLine Transit for the bus
stop.
b) A deceleration/right turn only lane with bus turnout
incorporated as part of the lane (if approved by SunLine
Transit and the City Engineer) shall be provided at the
Washington Street Primary Entry. The east curb face shall be
located sixty four feet (64') east of the centerline and length
to be determined by a traffic study prepared for the applicant
by a licensed traffic engineer per Engineering Bulletin # 06-13
or as determined by the City Engineer.
c► The east curb face shall be located fifty-six (56') east from the
centerline of Washington Street to accommodate the dual left
turn lane on southbound Washington Street at the Avenue 50
intersection.
Other required improvements in the Washington Street right-of-way and/or
adjacent landscape setback area include:
d► All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb,
gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. a 316
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
e) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk
shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave
and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either
touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the
curb at intervals not to. exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk
curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at
each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to
assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall
meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5
feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to exceed 250 feet.
f) Extend the existing raised median on Washington Street north
of Avenue 50 to line up with the curb face on the south side
of the primary entrance to prevent southbound Washington
Street traffic from making illegal left turns into the project
entrance on Washington Street as approved by the City
Engineer.
g) Establish a benchmark in the Washington Street right of way
and file a record of the benchmark with the County of
Riverside.
2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial - Option B; 100' R/W):
Widen the north side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the project
boundary to its ultimate width on the east side as specified in the General
Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or
reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and
convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban
arterial design standard. The north curb face shall be located thirty-eight
feet (38') north of the centerline, except at locations where additional
street width is needed to accommodate:
a) A right turn only lane on Avenue 50 at the Avenue
50/Washington Street intersection. The north curb face shall
be located forty eight feet (48') north of the centerline of
Avenue 50 and deceleration length to be determined by a
traffic study prepared for the applicant by a licensed traffic
engineer per Engineering Bulletin # 06-13 or as determined by
the City Engineer.
,� 311
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
Other required improvements in the Avenue 50 right-of-way and/or
adjacent landscape setback area include:
b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb,
gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs.
c) 6-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk
shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave
and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either
touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the
curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk
curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at
each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to
assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall
meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5
feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to exceed 250 feet.
d) A 12-foot wide raised landscaped median plus variable width
as needed along the entire project boundary to accommodate
for a left turn lane for the eastbound Avenue 50 traffic into
the project entry on the north side and for dual left turn lanes
for westbound Avenue 50 traffic at the intersection of
Washington Street and Avenue 50.
The landscaped median improvements are eligible for reimbursement
from the City's Development Impact Fee fund in accordance with
policies established for that program.
e) In the event the left turn pocket for eastbound Avenue 50
traffic into the project entry is constructed prior to the
construction of the off -site improvements associated with the
development on other side of the street, the applicant shall
widen the south side of Avenue 50 along the project boundary
to its existing southerly right-of-way to maintain the currently
existing two eastbound through lanes on Avenue 50 (minimum
24 feet) as approved by the City Engineer.
The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure
they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control
devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and
sidewalks).
,N 3la
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks,
bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved
construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by
the City Engineer.
The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned
above.
B. INTERNAL STREETS
1) Construct internal streets per the approved Site Development Permit
Preliminary Grading Exhibit and as approved by the City Engineer.
Minimum street width shall be 26 feet except at the entry
accessway. On -street parking shall be prohibited except in
designated parking stall areas. The applicant shall make provisions
for perpetual enforcement of the No Parking restrictions.
2) The location of driveways shall not be located within the curb return
when possible.
C. KNUCKLE
1) Construct the knuckle to conform to the lay -out shown in the Site
Development Permit, except for minor revisions as may be required
by the City Engineer.
26. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design
procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength
and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural
sections shall be as follows:
Residential/ Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b.
Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b.
Primary Arterial 4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b.
Major Arterial 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b.
or the approved equivalents of alternate materials.
27. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the
time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete.
M 3 -19
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design
procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent
(less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test
results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production.
The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are
approved.
28. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the
following:
A. Primary Entry (Washington Street): Right turn movements in and out are
allowed. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. All right -turn -out
only driveways shall have a splitter median island located in the driveway
throat that adequately channelizes the exiting right -turn vehicles turning
onto the arterial street to eliminate illegal left turns. The splitter island shall
be designed in conformance with design concepts approved by the City
Engineer.
B. Primary Entry (Avenue 50): Right turn in and out and left turn in
movements are allowed. Left turn movements out are prohibited. All right -
turn -out only driveways shall have a splitter median island located in the
driveway throat that adequately channelizes the exiting right -turn vehicles
turning onto the arterial street to eliminate illegal left turns. The splitter
island shall be designed in conformance with design concepts approved by
the City Engineer.
29. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings
and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks.
Mid -block street lighting is not required.
30. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted
standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City
Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be
stamped and signed by qualified engineers.
31. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County
Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by
the City Engineer.
PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS
.p 320
32. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
particular the following:
A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall
design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150.
B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is
required including accessibility routes between buildings.
C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to
evaluate ADA accessibility issues.
D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be
shown on the Precise Grading Plan.
E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a
minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking
stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or
as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking
stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls.
Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts,
dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features
shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths
and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer.
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer,"
"surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice
their respective professions in the State of California.
33. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of
qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the
provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans).
34. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and
approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line
item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale
specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may
be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note,
the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here
pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors.
./' 321
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan
B. PM 10 Plan
C. WQMP
1 " = 40' Horizontal
1 " = 40' Horizontal
(Plan submitted in Report Form)
NOTE: A through C to be submitted concurrently.
D. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1 " = 30' Horizontal
E. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan
1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4'
Vertical
F. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal
The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s)
(drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and
berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area.
G. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan
1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical
NOTE: D through G to be submitted concurrently.
(Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable)
H. Off -Site Median Landscaping Plans 1 " = 40' Horizontal
Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed
above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to
commencing plan preparation.
All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all
existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project
limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions.
All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit
Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue
RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans
and/or as approved by the Engineering Department.
n 322
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
"Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall &
Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of
cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions.
The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of
the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2010
California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door.
The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building &
Safety Department. A copy of the reviewed assessment shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department in conjunction with the Site Development Plan when it
is submitted for plan checking.
"On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface
improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters,
building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA
requirements.
35. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for
elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design
Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-
quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look
for the Standard Drawings hyperlink.
36, The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a
storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars).
37. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the
improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible
record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each
sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed
by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the
drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to
the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or
retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that
the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However,
if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and
reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a
letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal.
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS • M 32.3
38. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements on Washington Street and Avenue
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
50, the applicant deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and labor &
Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements
required on Washington Street and Avenue 50.
39. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the
development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely
manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to
halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals
related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the
improvements.
40. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and
the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required
to:
A. Construct certain off -site improvements.
B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of
its costs by others.
C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are
considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map.
D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others.
E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require.
Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant
shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction.
In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are
constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map,
or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of
such improvements.
41. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant
shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -
site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for
checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the
unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance.
.,0 324
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall
be approved by the City Engineer.
Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be
approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's
detailed cost estimates.
Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V.
improvements.
(;RAKING
42. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050
(Grading Improvements).
43. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer.
44. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain
approval of all of the following:
A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of
California,
B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer
registered in the State of California,
C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter
6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and
D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC
Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit
and Storm Management and Discharge Controls).
E. WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California.
All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or
engineering geologist registered in the State of California.
The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an
amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust
Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of
La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer.
45. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent
wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall
either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion
control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan.
46. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating
terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F)
except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope
shall not exceed 3:1 - anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the
backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed
2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet
adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is
within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of
way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall
be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18")
behind the curb.
47. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's
approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the preliminary grading plan,
unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these
Conditions of Approval. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant is advised
of the Coachella Valley Water District letter dated May 24, 2011 to the Planning
Department stating the development may set the finish floor elevations at a
minimum of 47 feet MSL with the condition that the development be protected by
means of a flood wall along the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The flood wall
shall be certified by a geotechnical engineer with the top of the wall at a minimum
elevation of 52 feet AMSL as required by CVWD.
48. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot
higher from the building pads in adjacent developments.
49. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining
properties and the lots within this development.
50. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site
by more than plus or minus half'of a foot (0.51 from the elevations shown on the
approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the
proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
finding review.
51. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall
provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or
surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation.
Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved
grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any.
Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The
data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at
different times.
52. If permitted by CVWD and the City Engineer, when an applicant proposes
discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the La Quinta Evacuation
Channel, the applicant shall indemnify the City from the costs of any sampling
and testing of the development's drainage discharge which may be required under
the City's NPDES Permit or other City- or area -wide pollution prevention program,
and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such
discharge. The applicant is required to construct required discharge treatment
Best Management Practice facilities per the NPDES Permit per Supplement A but
at a minimum shall install a CDS Unit or equal system as approved by the City
Engineer. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to
the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding
on all ,heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the
land within this tentative parcel map excepting therefrom those portions required
to be dedicated or deeded for public use. The form of the indemnification shall be
acceptable to the City Attorney. If such discharge is approved for this
development, the applicant shall make provisions for meeting these obligations.
The 100-year storm water HGL shall be at 48 foot elevation + or as determined
by CVWD.
Additionally, the applicant shall submit verification to the City of CVWD
acceptance of the proposed discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into
the La Quinta Evacuation Channel with the initial submittal of storm drain
improvement plans.
53. Since the preliminary rough grading plans previously submitted to the Public
Works Department did not demonstrate how storm water would be adequately
discharged into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel during major storm events
327
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
resulting in possible flooding of the site, the applicant is hereby notified that
future site modifications may be necessary including, but not limited to building
and street reconfiguration and additional improvements to the existing drainage
facilities. Verification of the proposed storm water retention system is subject to
review and approval by the Coachella Valley Water District and the City Engineer.
If in the event, the proposed retention capacity or pass through storm water flow
is found to be inadequate during final design, the Applicant shall revise what is
currently proposed in the preliminary hydrology study and make adjustments to
the site layout as needed to accommodate the increased retention/detention or
pass through capacity required to satisfy safety issues of the Public Works
Department and CVWD. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant may be
required to construct additional underground and above ground drainage facilities
to convey on site and off site stormwater as well as stormwater from adjacent
terrain by the La Quinta Evacuation Channel that historically flows onto and/or
through the project site. Any proposed channels that convey stormwater shall be
lined to protect against erosion as required by the Public Works Department and
CVWD.
54. If the development is not able to discharge storm or nuisance water from the
project into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design
Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary
Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No.
06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically,
stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the
development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm
shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest
total run off.
55. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per
approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology
Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and
Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design
Requirements.
56. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches
per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant
provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City.
Engineer.
57. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water
328-_
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
(through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or
adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a
requirement for development of this property.
58. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved
by the Planning Director and the City Engineer.
59. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be
according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary
Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed
3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally,
retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin.
60. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback
lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the
setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The
perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped
with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7).
61. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries
and levels in any area outside the development.
62. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention
capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into
the historic drainage relief route.
63. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and
retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route.
64. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff
per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 at
seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean
Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB)
Region Board Order No. 137-2008-001.
E. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and
Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the
NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and
maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order
�. 3Z�=_
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
No. R7-2008-001.
F. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-
CRB) Region Board Order No. 137-2008-001 utilizing BMPs approved by the
City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which
incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration
as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River
receiving water, as applicable.
G. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP
Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and
operation of stormwater BMPs.
65. The applicant shall install suitable facilities along the easterly boundary of the
project to preserve CVWD access and prohibit access to the right-of-way of the
La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Additionally, the applicant shall work with CVWD
to construct a perpetual maintenance access to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel
as required by CVWD and approved by the City Engineer.
UTILITIES
66. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110
(Utilities).
67. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all
utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures
including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves,
and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic
purposes.
68. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development,
and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground.
All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are
exempt from the requirement to be placed underground.
69. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For
installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with
trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer.
The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for
approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance
•' °� � � -3 30
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances.
70. Utility easements in favor of CVWD shall be clear of .any obstructions including
overhead obstructions.
CONSTRUCTION
71. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the
buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -
maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control
devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in
residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness,
the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten
percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City,
whichever comes first.
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
72. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping
Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans).
73. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians,
retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape
architect.
74. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent
irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape
regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape).
75. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a
recommendation to the Planning Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be
consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding
lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if
deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The
illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final
lighting plan submittal.
76. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash", and use high efficiency
pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. They shall be
included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code
Chapter 8.13.
":_ 331__
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
77. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view behind
the parapet. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment
shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match
the adjacent buildings.
78. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and
approval to the Planning Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan
application process. Planning Director approval of the final landscape plans is
required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Director
determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative
processing schedule.
NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City
official, including the Planning Director and/or City Engineer.
79. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance
requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all
landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street
right-of-way.
80. All trees located within the project site shall have a minimum trunk caliper of 2.5
inches.
81. Final field inspection of all landscaping materials, including all vegetation,
hardscape and irrigation systems is required by the Planning Department prior to
final project sign -off by the Planning Department. Prior to such field inspection,
written verification by the project's landscape architect of record stating that all
vegetation, hardscape and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance
with the approved final landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
82. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the
requirements of the Planning Director. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with
no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public
streets.
PUBLIC SERVICES
83. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine
Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer.
N 332
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
MAINTENANCE
84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160
(Maintenance).
85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance
of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and
stormwater BMPs.
FEES AND DEPOSITS
86. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees
and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for
plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be
those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits.
87. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the Coachella Valley Multi -
Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Habitat Conservation Plan
Mitigation Fee, in accordance with LQMC Chapter 3.34.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
88. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering a fire flow
4000GPM per minute for four hours duration at 20 psi residual operating
pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on
the construction site.
89. Approved accessible on -site super fire hydrants shall be located not to exceed
200 feet apart in any direction. Any portion of the facility or of an exterior wall of
the first story of the building shall not be located more than 150 feet from fire
apparatus access roads as measured by an approved route around the complex,
exterior of the facility or building.
90. The minimum dimension for gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a
minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. Any gate providing
access from a road shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway
and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road.
Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate
entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used.
91. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall furnish
two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review
N 333--
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
and approval. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall
confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are
signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented
to the Fire Department for review and approval.
92. Prior to issuance of building permits, the water system for fire protection must be
provided as approved by the Fire Department and the local water authority.
93. Blue dot retro-reflectors pavement markers on private streets, public streets and
driveways to indicated location of the fire hydrant. 06-05 (located at
www.rvcfire.org)
94. Fire Apparatus access road shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire
Department Standard number 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org). Access lanes
will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Access roads shall have an
unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes
will be designed to withstand the weight of 60 thousand pounds over 2 axles.
Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus.
Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather
driving capabilities.
95. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be
provided with approved provision for the turnaround capabilities of fire apparatus
96. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be
designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or
developer shall include in the building plans the required fire lanes and include the
appropriate lane printing and/or signs.
97. An approved Fire Department access key lock box shall be installed next to the
approved Fire Department access door to the building. Required order forms and
installation standards may be obtained at the Fire Department.
98. Display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side of building(s)
and/or rear access if applicable. Numbers and letters shall be a minimum of 12" in
height for building(s) up to 25' in height. In complexes with alpha designations,
letter size must match numbers. All addressing must be legible, of a contrasting
color, and adequately illuminated to be visible from street at all hours.
99. Should any portion of the building be deemed "mixed occupancy" the sprinkler
system shall be designed per referenced standard NFPA13R 7.2.4.1 through
7.2.4.2 per the CBC.
334--- -
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
100. The PIV and FCD shall be located to the front of building and a minimum of 25
feet from the building(s). Sprinkler riser room must have indicating exterior and/or
interior door signs. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with
current permit fees, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to
installation.
101. Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler system(s) with 20 or more
heads, along with current permit fees, to the Fire Department for review and
approval prior to installation.
102. Install a portable fire extinguisher, with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC, for every
3,000 sq. ft. and/or 75 feet of travel distance. Fire extinguishers shall be
mounted 3.5 to 5 ft above finished floor, measured to the top of the extinguisher.
Where not readily visible, signs shall be posted above all extinguishers to indicate
their locations. Extinguishers must have current CSFM service tags affixed.
103. No hazardous materials shall be stored and/or used within the building, which
exceeds quantities listed in 2010 CBC. No class I, II or IIIA of
combustible/flammable liquid shall be used in any amount in the building.
104. Exit designs, exit signs, door hardware, exit markers, exit doors, and exit path
marking shall be installed per the 2010 California Building Code.
105. Electrical room doors if applicable shall be posted "ELECTRICAL ROOM" on
outside of door.
106. Fire Alarm Control Panel room doors if applicable shall be posted "FACP" on
outside of door.
107. Fire Riser Sprinkler room doors if applicable shall be posted "Fire Riser" on outside
of door.
108. Roof Access room door if applicable shall be posted "Roof Access" on outside of
door.
109. Access shall be provided to all mechanical equipment located on the roof as
required by the Mechanical Code.
110. Air handling systems supplying air in excess of 2000 cubic feet per minute to
enclosed spaces within buildings shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff.
2010 CMC
,n 335,_
5 '.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2011-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2003-762 AMENDMENT 1
WSL LA QUINTA, LLC
JULY 19, 2011
111. Gate(s) shall be automatic or manual operated. Install Knox key operated
switches, with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Knox
Company. Building plans shall include mounting location/position and operating
standards for Fire Department approval.
112. Nothing in our review shall be construed as encompassing structural integrity.
Review of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from
all applicable regulations. Final approval is subject to plan review and field
inspection. All questions regarding the meaning of the code requirements should
be referred to Fire Department at 760-863-8886.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
113. Approved Cultural Resource Monitor(s) be present during all ground disturbing
activities. Experience has shown that there is always a possibility of encountering
buried cultural resources during construction related excavations, or
archaeological testing/data recovery. Should buried cultural deposits be
encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the
Monitor shall notify a Qualified (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and
Guidelines) Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation
plan for submission to the City and the Agua Caliente THPO.
114. Additionally, in accordance with State law, the County Coroner should be
contacted if any human remains are found during earthmoving activities. If the
remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted. The NAHC will make a
determination of the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The City will work with the
designated MLD to determine the final disposition of the remains.
115. A sign permit shall be submitted for staff approval for proposed monument signs
specified in Specific Plan 2004-071 Amendment 1.
116. As part of the Final Landscape Plan review process, the applicant shall submit a
revised plan for the main entrance vehicular courtyard depicting either the removal
of the water feature within the drive aisle or relocation of the water feature with
an enhanced interactive design.
117. As part of the Final Landscape Plan review process, the applicant shall submit a
revised plant palette that reflects an increased use of Colorado Desert native type
species of plants and shrubs.
..« 336
Ol
c 0 V
la "Ed
Eaw
o m :g
aCa
c
J c�3
t
N
3
sszu ,waaln nwo n ,M ..o.r s aaan9 unOwlox.
' ew0led el
E
I !
► 4 � , ! 1. '�
1a
tit,ii f si yi !9 ! I,
�Iii pi194�i u g i f;ll�il 3! !,i'll
}t: �f
5iIli9[ I [ t [ 1, .M If lI It; Ia9ll, li1J� l [ J1119.
1 , 9 199191
�� [ If J��ylt[t,tt+[,tet[ 'dill �eaiiiii�li[Ia
`�-° 11 �9�1199(tfl9ti99919 � �199l91}[991111ii,I91
S33 e�ee.ii�c� ati: _xa as r. xx9:::a99a9995
I
L
it l6 sls9;;;s:;;;;;sa6s slsaza;;9;;
e'. ............... ......... ..�!
i .. .......l', .... .EI!
®;tt jj ggj ;tto-j ;;jj 6
3 9 ,
j I[
11 �a.�1�1199; 99t1az�9 Q=�ala9l:9[Il
-�337
(-.
gUT
i
E1LGt
I,:
f
It
ctral�l
�ryl�
u '
gA'I
4
�0�:
■li�yt'
�
�
ill➢
`'
�
s
i
f.
a 338
R
117 19 t..'E
339
� .Na9dE�sseeee€
IB', �P:aS�MGe
jf
" P!
i�
r
g.
� r
i
nl
ssi
mi
�I
-" 340
��`�;.
�.,'
v�i
�l
341
o <
O x 3
�9 P
o89 T
ta
i
S�ts�
audPti
I
9
'" 348
,� 349
VA
�;A� vvv, Ay iiilll
„ mnk
,�\
PFd3JAPIAAY PLANTING PLANWEST H�#
LA QWfW
350
a
N 351
WIL
w7wel W,,.,
°
0
°poi o„ i
I lli: jlj Yiile4i �� `9"I`P8ii1`PU`ifiiti`9`19i`iPq R1`IOIi 6
tiff,
I
i�l1l� (��j� ' 1,11 i i i�j� i �i, ,�iil 1�I�� ',������il il�i �� � 9 �I I �' �l i i t
i� it t1111,1 � �, �'� �� � �
I
I �.l w11>• i Yf �.............-.11..................
�R 'tfE :iWlifiif9iip11flififRiSii66fiiilflfiKifi f i l l t}!!
HIM,s' i � �s
ry —PRB_ MWARY PLAN NO PLAN
u�a LNM
.M 352
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y
wr ;.
1 m 1 O 1
I II —
'
I I I
I I'I e
—
I
-
I
I IRI a N• c
I I I
1 I I
i
I I I � 1 �•• Om �\ � v-
I I �
zv
—
I
11p
I I I
I I'
i � I
i
l-
a PREUMNARY PLANTWO PLANWEST LlVWA 88eE€E€
lifeLA QWUA, CA
53
.•." 354
PFIEUMJARY PLANTING PLAN
WEST LIVING
LA (XWjk CA
7 ----------i-----------=-------------------
=t=====__!
_==
II
C ! •.PPP
:as
yc
CL
--
t
'
CF
Rt
LP FLCPR
e
Va $ vPRB.A&*W LMHnW PLANwwruvm
$ s s • uawrACA .!
» 356
4�$ voVINMyl a t� a g
p ri
Bi NV-ld `JNUI-Dn AH`dNWENd 4VIlJ8�
p e
a5'�i 1
9
1
�
A�\�A��A\\�-
a v 1. -
-IA- I
\,
fA I
a
_ - a
I
r. T
ac..-... _--._
r t
-------------------------------------I-------- -L.
----------------------- ---------------�.
-----------
351
V� v �v vvv VAv A
IM
1` `ll A,
MIQW
In
vA\vICJ
vvv �
\
\vq vvv A v vV AV v \ � 4
v°��Av\..♦ d:
o AVv` \Vy V
vtea v�p vv v y v q :
r e •��PREUMNARY LK*fr rG PLAN H �
4
wEsr LJYWG . v LA OLWA CA
•-" 358
zr!V
; " v
7
MAP Tl�
PFOAGRAW LJGHTM PLAN
LA OLWrAk CA
m WEW LNM
359
IWO IVINM V1
ONW-1 lS3M
NV-W ONLU-0-1 AHVNIVII-SUd
I;, 1 511 15 1
61 6 10 11
I lid- 11
44 woo ill I
-1 T
Is
"i 'lloblilh ia
-bill
13 El
H
----------------------
-----------------------------
I I
I I I u V r c
I II ee !Zq e
I I I c c cl vi
I II ee: ti .�•
I II z�vA ay.
I i iJ: cl . � ` `A v �•
I I rj III L � vvv v
I I
I I II
I i
I I I
PFEOu NARY UGHTWG PLAN �gWEST LWM
V S
LA OUKrA, CA
361
362
0
b JNLAn 1s3M , ® g
Nv'ld �w-FJn Aumvin3ud _. __ a J'
363,
I til} i fEli
isi "fPtfifr li {if af.
€E� RII 1i{ E{Ei I! �'!€�I€
Jill
fit
}[{'SEE it {# Hi { .,'ii s €{ Ii {}1N {' • - m 1' ii i" �t ! 1{�'
,
{{tt°
![._i lull E [ fi''It�R'E it € fi €fb� iI
€ E€{ {€ trF � li E� [ r} [€ ��� i t iiii€i ii. ([ �I • _
E'= lif I� f E�inF
€[' }E 9i€ �}}j ai t E 1� ii r°}'p a . I i ' E'• r': i i 'i�l'I,f�t[ }..� i ��}��[
tit
!E +
'®i P
fL>,
?id Etf'!qq iri}if
{1[ 1i'ai
ird I' ,
ii�§i �taE Hi
f;E
{! E it j' IIF! is
tit sn: a E' E# ii'1
• 'j1E$ i�i €d+y t{{°iih � ` (�,E,, Efl rE I'i j f{1e � I i �
7 ,a? 4§5 i°rdi IE!+ !,7
i dr a}f t fit i3; €1€dc € , I ' Rf 't} it `'� ' Iif. '
}it
e„r,..1FE Ri' x+palu
'(:1{lifttI
•1, �%t � Re { �s IEie{'IIp ,lis°i €+? 8
i i{IeIE i{ [ C 77 1i a a iil' i°d G
' d fte lE PE !I`i 1 [i #
{f{ff{EEi €I� �, S i; I f if
Oi
s' 9
tii r�tfi { �
m j,f'i tlf to
t r { fl I i €fIt fittf�i ' {f,' •
1';{E}EEf?ifE ei E'tij + °` Si;o f ff
}i f•i ii Eti I # {r � d �- � H E'` 49r,1� i 9 N
7{$ F .i
{ f € € 3ii • { a A 9y
E ra rit'#'} ii � E
[lZZ
tii} 1
INizarII,I [�E}
jig i ' 4�
If :;-P: { cg,.ysiiGlP,j� ji!{ t € IL�..I
I fill
Lit
v
!i
2 E IEJ� ii I Hit ig fill
it C#i srla! II i!
€ i €ii i UM
R S t 1 { fd &a
mill
iif[ ¢ {ffig
YO
v PRELEMNMY ucmnNG PLAN
0 8 p3g EEp g MG6.T t E LJr/M g
LA CWTA, CA
Itli eF
Is
CeieF 1 �'
y•yf
—
'aW
I
i
u t a 9
[,eI'EI�,IIIItFI a� it iFa]cgF ' a ;1IP! { ��{1i
t{ff �I � a i flf=lffl �
9 Nai H:'i1 I„0930
I --
P,jPF e `tPE;i
1I
ifE 1 t46i
1
IF+Q1
n
.II11ii�E�
i
peer
rtllE�l
e
I!{p1
Jill
lilifl�
flf
3
I
16
I +M1 ' �1►EII
FII
I I,
it
(Is
'I
f
KII
halit
�i
3E1
I
'9i44.
P
4
R
a
PF&R-M MW UG Mn PLAN III;
CAD S WEST Uvm
� � [ . , • u amlrn cn �
.11 365
4" V9 bINM tll o ' 0
VNW'11S3M o
If
y7
E
UP.
i es
"'
a
Q
a
a
s
lg:
g fl( !
e g {!it S�:
.c. l�4ga hffldp!`` �'!I
G A z.ids 3'1� 1 t
g �3f �igfsaa!lii
u: as
t s „
C `a
v
-
m
Oi'• : w
' O
4f
O^ p y E 3 E t O
e
_ Bp i 3 6a
g�x Iti a`a� u� so
" 366
W
§|pmrA
\ § |h(" Qm$| $'\ /4/m r|s�
:$§% f § \; #|
\[
�
§ �a p \
| �„ §!\• � /--
� ..,!
s ).\ , ..§ . �
� � ■■ \ �
/ ]
|
3 $wR#
.0
(
vii,111�
\ \\
\\§
§ . �• a-;r � §§)|
ON
| �
__ PFEUMNARY LJGHTNG PLAN |
LA MOM. CA
WEST M .
®v�n�vm.o
33
� 3
i i
i �
i
FS2L6 %"nI1RJ %uyip e3'q suaYY 91aa45 �1Ew�3+YM
ewoled el
..11 369
�
% � \; |
M�. ~ \
'! 370
L
L��iinil�ll
I
a 371
FSIZ6 ¢Iub111e]eluyipWOlv,aans �e�wwmM
ewo ed el s 3
372
, 0,�
La veinIlpgyllAil.
j
V 1 ri wMOQmSbeetQA�v�s'AY.�a1�Qe�h Ctllfarte 9l]5) �I I Yisi
i 4W.4ei
» 377
locee n'omrn
CSR6 elw^I!RJ ¢lump eS'q anuuy 91aaAS'pl•uMeM
RWOled e1
ay
o�
�s
•„M
378
I
4 e
La Paiwna _ j , , _
M 379
WM-
®Illlll���a
Illllllr
I
''
MA
380
'.e'
91w15 uo1W14RM
eIW� 'Oed
tt
3
f4i6 MwoARJ
ewoEe-V-o.,,s.
Erl
No
y 381
f fV3Ff:F Fan a't i=:"-ffiEiF`[lFFaF•Vtt
t
iis�titi:iei Faoiiiffitd cc:t
f:Flfi $fd" g7ECie!
39 9 9 4
ff iff:rsESFs F,eEfffffEsafera; si
::IeYf:IFrSiiS I: s46ffi9if S:2VPB9 t
! e i
!
i
CYr EFrP 41!eV iFFriPE fF i EifiE4E 3
E L'ttF� Eli' [e tP
t
c ;
44 E
!
is Fas 6 f is Ei FEES FF,ff it
t
uEF ErE iE?fY'z4f sEiYrafG 1a E3 3
t�
F11
:S
La i>t l ��I1 II � � m�v�l
0:
N 3:82
u
ca
n
M 383
t-
z
ewoled el�
°�
H
u
F
��IIIIIi���
385
L Patom
R YMl11L.IIY tiN 6...YB to
(wYO GyO
386
Y A i 3 a s � asaza m+oxm •+�nWOa ++s aeyeM
d �m
�:ae el
387
j-ems •WE
aa
u��u u►��u f
C,iP OEl P
o
O_c7 u
ra
i n_( )o
❑( )r�
✓G
OP
O�>
oc7
orb❑
GP
e o0
------- --------
CU
b
e
9
n
MIA
n
n 388
p 389
.a 390
e i la Pais I
H( - ` l a wulMm� wen & A. W. b0Mr+Catiruri.4E51 7 sell
laillill-illilh lil� � �Im
17 s
gg 2 f a A j [4u nWomnn: Dn'os r.�.rs
ewoledel���.,
b
n 393
La Pal�
WIM�Im Shoe[ 6 Acme W. In rlkl OIIIaiXs 1RiV E
•x uo.u. u�.smf..e. o..
.." 394
2
��
(SZi6 nrv+olll� nlN�nwa'.Y 3 nv15 uol1tllVsoM
�.
�
,
`b
4 !'•
gwOly
ewoled el*i!
E
I
r
396
3®
C
T't
Ilk
39
4
llill:j
3®IIIIII'IIM, _I=
398
ESZL6 AuaNP�n,4W el'OS anIwY9 �S,a1a,14�Mim
�R�ewoied
el
�:�
i5;e,a
e 399
ATTACHMENT 2
LA PALOMA
Specific Plan
City of La Quinta
Specific Plan No. 2004-071
Amendment No.1
March 2011
Prepared For:
• O
A%C
F' WESTliving
WEST SENIOR LIVING LA QUINTA, LLC
6005 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 215
Carlsbad CA 92011
(760) 496-7440
Prepared By:
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 Bob Hope Drive
Rancho Mirage, California 92270
(760) 320-9611
400
LA PALOMA
Specific Plan 2004-071
Amendment No.1
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
Purpose...........................................................................................1
Executive Summary ........................................................................ 2
TheProcess....................................................................................3
Relationship to Other Agencies....................................................... 3
Relationship to General Plan........................................................... 4
11. SPECIFIC PLAN
Project Description........................................................................14
Art in. Public Places.......................................................................15
Infrastructure Phasing...................................................................16
GradingConcept...........................................................................16
Erosion Control.............................................................................16
SWPPP / NPDES / PM 10............................................................17
Hydrology......................................................................................19
FloodControl ................................................. .............................19
On Site Storm Water Design.........................................................19
Nuisance Water.................:...........................................................19
Utilities.......................................................................................... 20
lll. LAND USE PLAN
LandUse....................................................................................... 25
Development Standards................................................................ 25
Residential Development Standards ............................................. 26
Deviations requested from Zoning Ordinance ............................... 27
Additional Development Standards ............................................... 28
Specific Plan Minor Modifications.................................................. 28
Specific Plan Amendment............................................................. 29
Modifications to Approved Grading Plan....... ................................. 29
Parking.......................................................................................... 29
Carports........................................................................................ 30
Fencingand Walls......................................................................... 30
Lighting......................................................................................... 30
i
401
IV. - CIRCULATION
Overview......................................
Off Site Circulation .......................
On Site Circulation .......................
Public Transportation ...................
V. LANDSCAPE
............................................... 33
............................................... 33
............................................... 33
............................................... 33
Landscape Concepts.................................................................... 36
Signage......................................................................................... 36
General Architectural Theme ........................................................ 36
ii
is 402
r
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Vicinity Map.....................................................................................:
5
Exhibit 2
Aerial Photograph.............................................................................
6
Exhibit 3
USGS Map.......................................................................................
7
Exhibit
Site Plan...........................................................................................8
Exhibit 5
City Zoning Map...............................................................................
9
Exhibit 6
City General Plan Map.............................................:.....................
10
Exhibit 7A.
Site Photos I..................................................................................:11
Exhibit 7B
Site Photos 11..................................................................................12
.
Exhibit 8
FEMA Map....................................................................................
13
Exhibit 9
Preliminary Grading Plan...............:..............................................
18
Exhibit 10
Preliminary. Hydrology Plan..........................................................
22
Exhibit 11
Existing Utilities............................................................................
23
Exhibit 12
Preliminary Water and Sewer .......................................................
24
Exhibit 13
Wall Fence and Monument Exhibit ...............................................
31
Exhibit 14
Lighting Plan.................................................................................
32
Exhibit 15A
Washington Street Cross Sections ...............................................
34
Exhibit 15B
Avenue 50 Street Cross Sections .................................................
35
Exhibit 16
Plant Palette.................................................................................
37
Exhibit 17
Overall Landscape Plan...............................................................
38
Exhibit 18
Typical Cottage Landscape..........................................................
39
Exhibit 19
Washington Street Plan View Landscape ....................................
40
Exhibit 20
Avenue 50 Plan View Landscape ................................................
41
Exhibit 21
Architectural Perspective ........................ :.....................................
42
Exhibit 22
Main Building Floor Plan 18S Floor .................................................
43
Exhibit 23
Main Building Floor Plan 2nd Floor ................................................
44
Exhibit 24
Main Building Elevations..............................................................
45
Exhibit 25
Cottage Al Floor Plan and Elevation ...........................................
46
Exhibit 26
Cottage A2 Floor Plan and Elevation ...........................................
47
Exhibit 27
Cottage B Floor Plan and Elevation .............................................
48
Exhibit 28
Monument and Directional Sign ...................................................
49
iii
n 403
APPENDIX
Appendix One .......................................................... General Plan Analysis
Appendix Two..........................................Adopted Resolutions/Ordinances
Ordinance No. 411
Zone Change 2003-112
Resolution No. 2004-149
Environmental Assessment 2003-470
Resolution No. 2004-150
General Plan Amendment 2003-091
Resolution No. 2004-152
Specific Plan 2004-071
iv
404
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
SECTION I INTRODUCTIONr, ,
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Specific Plan is to set forth the detailed development
principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a 14 +/- acre
site located at the northeast comer of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the
City of La Quinta. (Exhibit 1 — Vicinity Map). The project is designed and will be
managed as a multi -unit premier senior community. The community will consist
of independent living, assisted living and memory care units. Approval for the La
Paloma development on a 20 acre site has been acquired pursuant to the
adoption of Resolution 2004-152 for Specific Plan 2004-071 on December 7,
2004. This Specific Plan Amendment proposes development standards only for
the northerly 14 acre site and removing the south 7 acre site of Avenue 50 from
the Specific Plan. The project as previously approved will remain as a senior
retirement community. The south parcel will revert to the underlying standards for
the Residential Medium (RM) zoning. The owner/applicant is not the owner of the
south parcel and has no control or influence with respect to what may be
proposed or developed in the future..
This Specific Plan is intended to meet the requirements for a Specific Plan as set
forth in State law and City of La Quinta regulations. The State authorizes cities
and counties to adopt Specific Plans as appropriate in implementing their
General Plans. Such a plan is to include the detailed regulations, conditions,
programs, and any proposed legislation that is necessary for the systematic
implementation of the General Plan. The Specific Plan provides the linkage
between the General Plan (and the general goals and policies of the City) and
the detailed implementation of that plan with tools such as zoning ordinances,
subdivision ordinances, and the like. The Government Code (Section 65451) sets
forth the minimum requirements of a Specific Plan and states:
"A Specific Plan shall include a text and diagram or diagrams which
specify all of the following in detail:
The distribution, location and extent of the uses of land, including
open space, within the area covered by the plan.
2. The proposed distribution, location and extent an intensity of major
components of public and private transportation, sewage, water,
drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential
facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the
plan and needed to support the land uses described by the plan.
3. Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and
standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of
natural resources, where applicable.
-1-
March 2011
405
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
4. A program of implementation measures including regulations,
programs, public works projects, and financing measures
necessary to carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)."
The establishment of specific performance, design, and development standards
is set forth to guide the development of the subject property in such a way as to
implement the General Plan while maintaining some flexibility to respond to
changing conditions which may be a factor in any long term development
program.
The document also acts to augment the City's Zoning Ordinance by providing
particular design guidelines, a tailored list of allowable, conditionally allowable,
and prohibited uses for the site, and unique development standards. The site
plan, architectural and landscape illustrations in the Specific Plan establish a
design theme with detailed perspectives. These illustrations are conceptual and
do not constitute precise pre -construction drawings.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
La Paloma is a proposed full service retirement community located on
approximately 14+/- acres on the northeast corner of Washington Street and
Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (Exhibit 2 — Aerial Photograph). The General
Plan designation of the site is RMH/Medium High Density Residential (pursuant
to the adoption of Resolution 2004-150). See Exhibit 6 — General Plan Map. The
Zoning designation is RMH/Medium High Density Residential (pursuant to the
adoption of Ordinance No. 413). See Exhibit 5 Zoning Map.
The project site fronts Washington Street which is designated by the City's
General Plan as a major arterial, and abuts Avenue 50 designated as a primary
arterial. The site is vacant and generally flat and has been grubbed and leveled
in the past. The site was previously entitled for single-family subdivision in the
early 1990's but the entitlements lapsed.
Property to the immediate east is the CVWD evacuation channel. Further east on
the far side of the channel is the City Park and Sports Complex as well as the La
Quinta Middle School and single family residences. Surrounding property to the
North is subdivided and mostly developed with single family residences & directly
west across Washington is La Quinta County Club. Property to the south is
vacant and zoned for Medium Density Residential. Site photos are illustrated on
Exhibits 7A and 7B.
The project will operate as a multi -unit residential community catering to older
adults desiring access to various on -site services. Programs and services such
as dining, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, social and recreational activities
are provided on -site. La Paloma will utilize a "supportive living" approach to provide
services in a home environment, blending in the latest knowledge and expertise from the
-2- March 2011
to 406
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City ar La Quinta
Amendment No.1
various long-term disciplines (Exhibit 4 Site Plan). Additionally the project site will be
environmentally responsible and will take steps both during and after construction to
insure minimal impact to the surrounding neighborhood and a positive long term impact
on those that will. reside and work at La Paloma. Residents of La Paloma will be
charged an entry fee based on the unit type selected and a monthly fee that will be
determined on the service needs and desire of the patient. There will be no
independently owned units within the project.
The Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan.identifies the site as
having no significant issues constraining, the property.
THE PROCESS
The purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a detailed plan for a selected area
within the City for the purpose of implementing the General Plan. The Specific
Plan outlines and directs all facets of development for the site. The standards of
development delineated in this Specific Plan create a link between the General
Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the Specific Plan is intended to
carry out the goals and polices contained in the La Quinta General Plan in an
orderly fashion.
The project will require approvals from the City of La Quinta for amendments to
the Site Development Permit and to the Specific Plan. Each of these
applications shall be consistent with the previously approved Specific Plan
document. In addition the City will review the building construction documents
which must also be consistent with the Specific Plan and . Site Development
Permit approvals.
The project and the various applications that are necessary to complete the
entitlement process shall be consistent with the ordinances, policies, and
regulations of the City of La Quinta unless otherwise approved within this
Specific Plan.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AGENCIES
In addition to the approvals and actions on the part of the City, permits will be
needed from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for connection to water
and sewer lines. Other infrastructure extensions or connections will be required
by the Imperial Irrigation District for electrical power, Verizon for telephone
service, Southern California Gas Company for natural gas, and Time Warner
Cable for cable TV service.
Coachella Valley Water
Avenue 50. They contrc
landscape of its property
District controls a portion of the slope area adjacent to
I any drainage into the channel. and any alterations or
-3-
March 2011
407
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City d La Quinta
Amendment No.1
A skilled nursing facility component was previously proposed and would have
required State approvals. This component has since been eliminated and State
OSHPOD approval is no longer necessary.
The assisted living and Alzheimer/dementia segments of the community will be
licensed by the California State Department of Social Services as Residential
Community for the Elderly (RCFE).
RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL PLAN
All development within La Paloma Specific Plan shall be consistent with the
provisions of the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed General Plan Land Use
for the site is shown in Exhibit 6.
Among the important provisions of the General Plan that will be implemented
upon the development of La Paloma include:
• Land Use - The General Plan suggests that the appropriate locations for
Medium High Density Residential Uses include areas where planned
community facilities, major vehicular transportation system access,
appropriately sized utilities, commercial services and employment uses are
easily available, and where adjacent development is compatible.
• Land Use - Medium. High Density Residential Uses should be located close to
park/open space uses such as neighborhood and community parks, schools
or other recreational facilities.
• Land Use - Medium High Density Uses can be used to buffer lower density
residential uses from commercial facilities and arterial roadways.
• Circulation - The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines the design
and location of required street improvements to complete the transportation
system in the City. La Paloma will complete the unfinished portions of two
important links in the City's circulation network: Washington Street and
Avenue 50. Possible improvements may be sidewalks, bicycle links, bus
stops, and signal improvements.
• Roadway Image Corridors - In addition to roadway improvements, the project
will implement special roadway corridor improvements which will evoke the
unique identity and character sought by the City of La Quinta. Washington
Street is identified as a Primary Image Corridor and Avenue 50 is shown as a
Secondary Image Corridor.
• Water Quantity and Quality -The Specific Plan outlines the use of drought
tolerant planting and irrigation techniques and incorporates a grading concept
designed to detain stormwater on site.
• Infrastructure - The Specific Plan incorporates plans to complete the
infrastructure that lies adjacent to the project site.
4 - March 2011
SIT
h /
i
ill HIGHWAY I I I
. AVENUE 48
CUTY OF
LA allDMTA
SAGEBRUSH
PALM DRIVE
. 0
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
Q ' EXHIBR 2
o,a�„
4vFiN
sa6CON�UL
Aerial Photograph Exhibit410
Lci Poloma
Specific Pion
Mmsm ,®�,G�
m� °0®• r� t� m'v0
ASH
It •
Date Palm Drive? .. ••,,` `
1� II � � _ �OpL .•
(/•'^�, + aid
lr _
EXHIBIT 3
ter..
Ntsn C0NSUL7yjG• INC United States Geological Survey
waoi�seuen,uoa.awo�men.cwmti Lo PC11omC1
11B 00 ' "" cam 329.7U3 Specific Plan
411
WASNINGlIX19iPEEl
I� tp€E 1'E�E.11
I Ev����I1 9�}SRA
63635656 p 1&£SkS
�5.6 E''d y Si'3SS
I egeeay.
HIM
''1Bv":k�
. i
E
n
o a o
n
&
°
g
B
0,
~�
m
D
Y H
N
EXHIBIT 4
MSA CONSULTING. INc
lump a Ci9. bm®o a Ym Mamw
Site P ! CI Pl
LG7 POIOITO
Specific Plan
WW bBsl mn.t.®roo .G faTA
TM�A9D9p1iPiCM 'm
412
4
w�z
s sz
€ill.§
�
3-
A
EXHIBIT 5
IV
MSA CONSULTING, INC
Existing Zoning M a p
Lcr F'GtlomC!
Specific Plan
waaa m.wrv..�u�.Imum.GW=
TMmE"'�'b°'91p'n.:t�maam�
413
rm BE100 BEOUBEBEz OMER o
S
i. a.
^ N R jo F
3 y y 9 p& 9
q$
n p o 5 m m m y_
eq- $ m E o H K W
yY
O v@
qg3@
E 'E d 0 C n
Qq
n- n Z
to
x
u-
i j
rn
s 3 o s z
E N e
S E
K K
E
EXHIBIT 6
Lo Polomc.::p
EXHIBIT TA
QV
MSA CONWLT!jll. INN Existing Site Photographs (1 ofe..mo.a.n.. x DWH Da .a;�o� .CAWM LcJ Polomo naeos-5
(MMm.F..cMm = Spaclffc Plan 4
N.
0
a
0
0
0
2
>
>
0.6
>m
z
z
m
z
>
EXHIBff 76
re
rN *Co wG, INc
Existing Si e Photographs (2 of 2)
RcAcDor-"c3 I
F Spt--clfif-- Pic3n
I
�CWMD.M-P-CMMM
416
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City d La Quinta
Amendment No.1
SECTION Ill. SPECIFIC PLAN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of a 14 acre parcel located on the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. The site is currently
vacant but has been cleared and grubbed. It was previously approved for the
development of a single family tract of houses (Tentative Tract Map 26148) in the
late 1980's and the approval was extended into the early 1990's. However the
entitlements were allowed to lapse. The project site abuts a mostly built out
established tract of single family homes which take access from Washington
Street at Sagebrush Avenue.
La Paloma is a proposed full service retirement community complex that will offer
208 living units to older adults. There will be 117 units of independent living, 20
cottages, 54 units of assisted living and 17 dementia Alzheimer units for
residents to choose from. The project will have one and two story buildings with a
maximum height of 25 feet. Cottage units are spread around the outside of the
project to reduce the height at the edges of the property. The independent living
section will act similar to a hotel with a formal drive to the front drop off area. The
operation of La Paloma will be a residential setting that provides and coordinates
housing, basic and personal care services, 24 hour supervision, social activities
and health related services to all 3 unit types. The project is designed and will be
operated to accommodate individual resident choice of activities and interest, as
well as, personal and health care needs.
Using an Equivalent Unit basis for determining the project density, the maximum
resident population based on available beds is 261 persons and maximum staff
shift is 52. Using the City standard of 2.85 persons per unit, the equivalent
density is 110 units, or 7.85 units per acre.
A full scale of on -site amenities will be provided to residents. Outdoor activities
will include a pool, putting course, dog park, gardening areas, a covered bar and
barbeque with dancing area. Indoor amenities will consist of a library, computer
center, activity rooms, billiards, salon, fitness center, bistro, wine bar and dining
room. Nutrition, diet and exercise consulting will also be available. Daily
scheduled and on -call transportation services to dining, shopping, and
appointments will be made available to serve residents needs. The assisted living
will have its own dining room and activity spaces. The dementia portion of the
community is a secured setting with electronically controlled ingress and egress.
The building will have an enclosed garden and a large great room for activities
and dining that will include a country kitchen for both staff and residents. The
assisted living and Alzheimer/dementia segments of the community will be
licensed by the California State Department of Social Services as a Residential
Community for the Elderly (RCFE).
- 14 - March 2011
418
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
The complex will have a.staff of approximately 96 full time equivalent employees.
La Paloma will run a three -shift operation to provide around the clock coverage
care for residents. The largest shift will consist of 52 people and will staff the
community during the normal weekday period (business hours). During the
evening shift the number of employees will drop to approximately 32 people while
approximately 12 will work overnight shifts. Staff positions will include
administration, trained nursing staff (RN/LVN), housekeeping, dining services,
building and grounds maintenance.
La Paloma will be an environmentally .sustainable community that will help
facilitate and encourage health and wellness for•residents and employees. The
project will create community connectivity through access to public
transportation, and encourage carpooling of employees. Recycling 'within the
project through the use of collection bins will also be encouraged. Water and
energy efficiencies will be implemented through out the project by using high -
efficiency, low flow rate plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated appliances.
Architectural features, such as color, materials, and shading devices will also
reduce the projects energy demands. Landscaping will meet or exceed CVWD
water budget requirements.,
Parking for the facility is primarily located directly off the perimeter drive. The
perimeter drive is proposed to provide fire and safety equipment access as well
as servicing to the complex. The site plan complies with required • landscape
setbacks on both Washington Street and. Avenue. 50 and employs a single
vehicular access from each street to the, site. These standards are consistent
with the adopted image corridors established in the General Plan. The site is
irregular in shape and the development is constrained by the shape, as well as
the additional street dedication on Washington to comply with the General Plan
and the staff request for additional right-of-way to accommodate a dedicated right
turn lane. The project proponent previously dedicated full General Plan Right -of -
Way for both streets.
The two story buildings are, located a minimum of 75 feet from the existing single-
family homes located on the south side of Saguaro Street.
The proposed cottage locations require a minor variation from the 15 foot
setback to the rear of the housing units by asking for a minimum setback of 12 '/v
feet but the overall average meets the Zoning Ordinance requirement.
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
The, requirement for Art in Public Places will be satisfied in accordance with
Chapter 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
- 15 - March 2011
419
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING
The infrastructure improvements required in conjunction with this development will all be
installed and completed prior to occupancy of the facility. All of the adjacent
infrastructure improvements adjacent to the site will be improved with the initial
development of the property.
GRADING / DRAINAGE / FLOOD CONTROL
The site will be mass graded and it is anticipated that there will be an export of material
from the site, as the property on the south side of Avenue 50 is noticeably low. There
may be an opportunity to equalize the two sites and minimize the number of truck trips
needed. Due to the sensitivity of the neighbors along Saguaro Street, the building pad
elevations will be established at an elevation of 47 feet, which ranges from level with up
to 5 feet lower than the adjacent homes to the north of the campus site. Overall it is
anticipated that approximately 15,000 cubic yards of export material will be moved from
the site. Stormwater, including that from a 100-year event will be stored on site in
underground retention facilities. As an alternative, a regional assessment could be
undertaken to determine the feasibility of discharging flows into the channel after first
flush. To do this the City and CVWD would have to see an analysis that showed there
was adequate capacity in the channel when the subject property was discharging storm
flows.
Due to the adjacent Evacuation Channel, CVWD has noted that the channel water
surface elevation is established at 48 feet (above sea level). They will require that the
site development plan and street improvement plans for Avenue 50 are designed and
constructed to contain a water surface elevation of 50 feet in order to maintain channel
integrity. The Preliminary Grading Plan is shown in Exhibit 9.
EROSION CONTROL
The grading operations shall include adequate provisions for wind and water erosion
control. both during as well as after grading operations have ceased. The details of
erosion control shall be included in the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and PM 10 Plan.
Prewatering - The site shall be prewatered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset
of grading operations.
During Grading - Once grading has commenced, and until grading has been
completed, watering of the site and/or other treatment(s) determined to be
appropriate shall be ongoing.
Post Grading - All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion for the term
that the area will remain undeveloped. Wherever feasible, final landscape and
irrigation shall be installed as soon as feasible after grading operations have been
completed.
- 16 - March 2011
-0-'' 4 2
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City d La Quinta
Amendment No.1
SWPPP/NPDES/PM 10
Since the Coachella Valley, experiences periods of moderate to heavy wind
conditions, wind-blown dust and sand is a concern with mass grading operations,
especially those in excess of five acres in size. Because of health concerns, the
Environmental Protection Agency has instituted a plan in the valley to curb
excess PM .10 (small particle dust). The City also participates in the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program. The City of La Quinta requires
SWPPP, NPDES and PM 10 plans to control the wind and water born erosion
associated with such grading operations. The project will comply with the City's
requirements relative to these programs.
- 17 - March 2011
M 421
uoid Sulloads
col
MF13[ tm0 •.a • lusaxc (on) u.
u�JId u1pt�J� I�u1l,UlIaJd
a......r m.!•�+.o•mo.a.
Dxi'orur'MsxoD VSNI
61181HX3
;�I€ Is�i(� _ r •.� §"uz�
' a-- -07 7 i i �l,Py: �r i 4 a �. �, 1 9f �• - f i
ili!
i11 elp i iayl�el. Ieilgag q l Y� lifflii43r1�s6i91fiillil I:I�a a P!!i b = i # � $1 20.
8t�6;I
p qgp ittp ii i i i e! 5
, t l9Sii e a i as 9e ai�li i!� N I I I I I I i ' '•• � .1lile �aildll� g ! 1
leig;€ lvffli I S
g��T i o �. °� � o.,� . e I J � ! � ' � �l31➢4L��ltie
n C
i r r
�I
It4
R r
�I
it S a
lag R
cit
I�
.F
i
It
OM—
K
r
4?_2
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1.
HYDROLOGY
La Paloma lies in a Zone X Other Areas flood zone as determined by FEMA,
Community Panel Number 06065C-2241G, revised August 20, 2008. Zone X
includes areas to be outside the 500-year event. There are no tributary flows
that have to be accommodated in the development of the site. Exhibit 10.
FLOOD, CONTROL MASTER PLAN
The stormwater drainage system in the City of La Quinta is administered by the
CVWD. Generally speaking, the system consists of improvements to the natural
drainage channels that run through the City. There is an existing storm drain
located in Washington Street that collects storm water and conducts that flow into
the adjacent evacuation channel via a storm drain in Avenue % Water collected
in the evacuation channel then feeds into the Whitewater River and ultimately to
the Salton Sea.
ON -SITE STORM WATER DESIGN / PWQMP
The City of La Quinta in conjunction with the CVWD requires each development
to include provisions for handling storm water attributed to the site. The design
storm which creates the worst case scenario is a 100-year, 24-hour event. Each
development project must either retain the 100-year storm on site or discharge
into an approved storm water system after first flush containments have been
removed. The initial storm water design concept for La Paloma is to retain the
storm water on site in underground chambers. A Preliminary Water Quality
Management Plan will be submitted as part of the Site Development Permit,
showing how the first flush containments will be collected and removed from the
storm water prior to percolation or dewatering.
NUISANCE WATER
Nuisance water attributed to the project will be collected and directed to the
underground retention areas if that is the final method chosen for handling
stormwater. If a direct discharge approach is proven feasible, nuisance water will
be directed to one or more dry wells which will, also handle first flush capture and
treatment prior to being discharged into the evacuation channel. The amount of
nuisance water is expected to be reduced due to the use of water efficient
landscape and irrigation materials.
- 19 - March 2011
423
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
UTILITIES
La Paloma is well served by utilities and is situated in a corridor planned for a
relatively intense scope of urban development. Utility extensions will be minimal
with most utilities existing at the perimeter of the site. Some upgrades will be
required by the individual utility companies providing service to the property.
Several overhead utility lines exist along Washington Street, Avenue 50 and
along the evacuation channel. It is the intent of the development to underground
all of the adjacent overhead utility lines with the exception of the transmission
lines following the alignment of the evacuation channel, as required by the City of
La Quinta and regulated by the Imperial Irrigation District. Exhibit 11.
Street improvements implementing the project conditions of approval will be
installed concurrently with the construction of the project and will be completed
prior to occupancy of the facility.
SEWER PLAN
Sanitary sewer facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. Sewer mains are
located on the west side of the site in Washington Street, in Avenue 50 and also
in the Evacuation Channel at the southeast corner of the site. Sewage will flow
by gravity to the main. No upsizing of facilities will be required. The on -site
sewer system will be private (see Exhibit 12).
WATER PLAN
Water facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. An 18" main exists in
Washington Street and there is also an 18" main in Avenue 50. The on -site
water lines will be connected into the existing infrastructure network in at least
two places to avoid "dead-end" lines.
CVWD WELL SITE
No well site is being required for this site. The nearest well is located outside the
site near the northeast corner of the site.
ELECTRICAL PLAN
The Imperial Irrigation District provides electric facilities in the City of La Quinta.
The District indicates that the design of the electrical service will depend on final
load calculations for the overall project. The District will require the installation of
underground facilities throughout the project. Existing power poles located on
Washington Street, Avenue 50 and the north property line will also be under -
grounded as allowed by I.I.D.
- 20 - March 2011
424
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quints
Amendment No-1 _
OTHER UTILITIES
Natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. The nearest
facility is a' 6" line located in Washington Street. The project 'site will
independently connect into the gas line.
Television cable service is provided by Warner Cable with the nearest facilities
located in Washington Street at Saguaro Drive abutting the site.
Telephone service will be provided by Verizon. Existing facilities exist in both
Washington Street and in Avenue 50. Verizon expects to serve the project from
these locations.
Waste disposal service is provided by Burrtec Waste Industries. The project also
proposes to implement recycling 'facilities within the project through the use of
collection bins, and instructions to occupants and employees on their use.
Waste and recycling materials will be collected on site by employees and brought
to the central service area located near the main kitchen area. Burrtec trucks will
have a one -stop point of collection for all waste and recycling materials.
- 21 - March 2011
425
D
L
L
ll�
lmlp:llmll
.111 ME
MESE
m
EIS
EE1E
Uffm
AIR%
EXHIBff 10
a
MSA CoNsuLTwo. lNr-
Preliminary Hydrology Plan
Lc:3 Rc:slorric3 I
SplB(--ifl4-- Plan
426
EN,IWWATRN
EX WWERFDRMt
- _jExx�wsu ry—WA—MING
=.=�IHEPlI6iJE_._ EX_1E1IMIOIaE
F_q
1 �I
.ff
OI CAB
o I
s1101p, \
ON \,
a
Ny
w� � ^\ EXHIBIT 11 \ \ \
/n MSA coN,TIN6• INC Existing Utilities
weoae,a.,m,,,R ®,Bm.o,asm,F Lco PcBlomcB
"'g°° 00 MOM - Fm CMM 3M � specific Plan
427
Uold '�;lc>ads
r�wo�o,� 01
rat4a mr3:.a . m� rort.v.�t 1,,
W2D6q•�•.O3m..•..®.W�BGEp[ "W\
UDId JGM2 S puD Ja;D/y� oulwgaJd
m+..wvn•.®maa o•o...�
JNj 'DNIL7ILSN0,7 t75`jAj
\ \ Z L 1181HX3
s
NOOf
v.�
Lj
y—�.—�—•._� � �l-NIOYI'ViyNNa�M L M
�.._ � �vii1W1+/�lldi�r�� 1 n' �WVW 3J-` i�Qi 9•Xi '
NOLLO3NNOO iO 1MOd 1 ""a31tlM.81'X3
ll VM O35Od044
0
z
z
z0
O
z_
0_
O
0
a
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City d La Quinta
Amendment No.1
SECTION III LAND USE PLAN
LAND USE
The land use designation for the site is medium high density residential (RMH).
This designation will facilitate the proposed continuing care retirement community
complex.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The uses and development. standards will generally be in accordance with the
provisions of the La Quinta Zoning and General Plan- regulations. Should conflict
occur between the regulations and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan and
supporting text shall prevail. The following proposed development standards are
applicable to the La Paloma Specific Plan and are meant to augment Section
9.40 of the City's Municipal Code.
RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES
RESIDENTIAL PROHIBTED USES
Senior group housing 7 or more persons
Guesthouses
Restricted Senior Housing
Non commercial keeping of, hoofed
animals or fowl.
Licensed Memory Care Facility
A ricultural Uses
Attached or detached casitas
Parking of recreation vehicles
Garages and carports
Patio covers, decks, gazebos and outdoor
terraces
Fences and walls
Clubhouses and swimming.pools, spas and
cabanas
25 - March 2011
429
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City d La Quinta
Amendment No.1
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Minimum lot size for single-family detached
or attached
3600 sq. ft.
Minimum project size for multifamily projects
20,000 sq. ft.
Minimum lot frontage for - single-family
detached or attached
40 ft.
Minimum frontage for multifamily projects
100 ft.
Maximum structure height
28 ft. (36' for entry tower only)
Maximum number of stories
2
Minimum front yard setback (non -garage
portions of dwelling)
20 V
Minimum garage setback for single-family
detached or attached
25 ft.
Minimum interior/exterior side yard setbacks
for single-family detached and multifamily
buildings
5/10 ft.
Minimum sideyard setbacks for single-family
attached
Ton attached side, 10' on open side
Minimum rear yard setback
15 ft. / 12 ft. requested
Maximum lot coverage
60%
Minimum livable floor area for single-family
detached excluding garage
1400 sq. ft.
Minimum livable floor area for multifamily
units excluding garage
740 sq. ft.
Minimum landscape setbacks adjacent to
perimeter streets 3
10' minimum at any point, 20' minimum
average over entire frontage
Minimum common open area
30%
- 26 - March 2011
430
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
Projects with five or more adjacent dwelling units facing the same street shall incorporate
front setbacks varying between 20 feet and 25 feet or more in order to avoid streetscape
monotony.
Twenty feet if "roll -up" type garage door is used.
2 For interior setbacks, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is five feet
plus one foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum
setback of ten feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level
or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17-foot building.
3 Does not apply to single-family detached if a specific plan is required. Landscaping
and open area shall be per the standards of Section 9.60.240
DEVIATIONS REQUESTED FROM ZONING ORDINANCE
1. For the rear setback of the single story cottage units, the minimum
setback shall be 12' but each building shall average no less than 15'.
2. Garage setbacks from the driveway shall be 5' or less or 20' or more.
3. Since the project mixes active, assisted and memory care type of units,
the density calculation is being made on an Equivalent Unit basis using
the City's 2.85 persons per unit average to calculate the net density.
Thus every 2.85 persons in residence equal one unit.
4. Due to the inclusion of common kitchen and dining facilities to serve the
residents, individual units are proposed at 675 square feet of.livable
whereas the standard for multi -family units in the Zoning Ordinance is a
minimum of 750 square feet.
5. Architecturally integrated parapets up to five feet in height are proposed
(all structures to otherwise meet height standards).
6. One entry tower element may be allowed up to 36 feet in height. Such
element shall be a maximum of 40' x 40' in dimension.
7. As the nature of La Paloma includes Assisted Living and Memory Care
units and all visitors must enter the complex at the main reception area
the parking arrangement may not meet the normal City requirement of
100 feet maximum distance from parking spaces to a unit entrance door.
8. Due to the multiple use and activity centers on the La Paloma campus,
the signage program is requesting slightly larger sign faces (6.8 sq. ft. per
face rather than the ZO permitted 3 sq. ft.) in order to facilitate traffic
movement.
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
- 27 - March 2011
431
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
General Requirements:
(A). Architectural projections such as roof overhangs, chimneys, awnings and
canopies may encroach a maximum of two feet into any required setback
provided such projections are no closer than three and one half feet from
any property line.
(B). Masonry walls or decorative fencing a maximum of six feet in height shall
be used along the perimeter property line and public streets.
(C). No patio cover, trellis, gazebo, arbor, similar structure or combination
thereof shall cover more than fifty percent of the rear area required
setback.
(D). The minimum setback for front entry type garages or carports shall be
twenty five feet, if a standard "pivot" type garage door is used, twenty feet
if a "roll up" type garage is used and twenty feet for a carport.
(E). Swimming pools and spa water surfaces shall not be closer that 5' to any
side/rear property line and no closer than 10' to front property line or main
structure.
(F). Screening of common parking areas shall be provided in all residential
projects.
(G). Roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment including but not limited
to air conditioning and heating shall be screened and an integral part of
the roof design. Screening parapets will be a maximum of five feet.
Modifications and Amendments
Specific Plan Minor Modifications
The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan not requiring a
Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director. The Planning Director shall have the discretion to refer any such requests
for modification to the Planning Commission.
Change in utility and or public service provider.
a A maximum shift of ten percent (10%) of the total number of various unit
types provided the total number of units or density for the entire Specific Plan
area does not exceed that established in the Specific Plan Amendment.
Minor changes to the landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment,
entry design, and streetscape design, which are consistent with the
- 28 - March 2011
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
conceptual design set forth in the design guidelines, contained within in the
Specific Plan.
■ Minor changes to the design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual
in nature only, and are intended to be flexible in implementation.
■ Other modifications. of similar' nature to those listed "above, which are
deemed minor by the Planning Director, which are in keeping with the
purpose and intent of the approved La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment
and which are in conformance with the General Plan.
Prior to the Planning Director making a written determination as to the substantial
conformance of a revised plan in accordance. with, the standards set forth in the
approved La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment, the applicant shall prepare a written
request that addresses the nature of the revisions an dhow the revised plan
complies with the adopted Specific. Plan Amendment standards. The applicants
request shall. be accompanied by appropriate graphic and or technical information
'that supports the revisions.
Specific Plan Amendments
Amendments to the La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment may be requested by the
applicant at any time pursuant to Section 65453(a) of the Government Code.
Amendments shall be processed to pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code
for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the proposed amendment requires
supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the, applicant(s) are. responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA
documentation..
Modifications to Approved Gradina Plan
Final grading may vary from the projects approved tentative map within the following
restrictions: ,
1. Finish grade elevations may vary by,up or down .5 feet within the first 50 feet
adjacent to. the northerly property line an d1.0 feet up pr down elsewhere,on the
site.
2. Final grading plans may be altered due to 'minor changes` in building
configuration, door locations, parking lot revisions, CVWD _requirements and
changes in ADA paths of access.
Parkina Reauirements
The City of La Quinta Zoning Ordinance prescribes a total of 1 space per unit (.5 spaces
per unit primary parking and .5 spaces per unit for guest parking) for senior housing
projects. The Ordinance further requires one parking space per each four beds in
convalescent hospitals, nursing homes and the like. These standards cover- parking
needed both by the residents as well as the staff for the facility.
29 - March 2011
;. 433
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City or La Quinta
Amendment No.1
Using the current city standards the required parking would be 197 spaces for the
various independent and assisted units and 6 spaces for the memory care unit. The
total parking provided is 246 spaces which leave an excess of 32 spaces to help with
peak periods of parking overlap during shift changes, occasional visitor spikes during
holidays and the like. The applicant is comfortable with these ratios based on extensive
experience with this land use type.
Carports /Garages
Flat roof carports shall be utilized on the project site. The previous site plan was
approved with some carports abutting the single family area to the north. The revised
site plan has relocated the carports to the south side of the perimeter drive and is now a
minimum of 105' setback from the adjacent single family. The standard for covered
parking is '/2 spaces per senior unit. The project proposes 113 carport spaces and 20
garage spaces which meet the 97 spaces requirement.
Fencina and Walls
The service areas shall be effectively screened from view by masonry walls of the same
or complementary materials as the main building walls. A uniform perimeter masonry
wall shall be constructed along the northerly property line of the northern parcel.
In those areas where existing masonry walls are present and in good condition, the walls
will be stuccoed and painted to match. In areas where there is either no wall or a wood
fence, a new 6 foot high masonry wall will be erected. If requested by any of the
property owners abutting the project, the perimeter masonry wall may be up to 8 feet in
height (see Exhibit 13). A combination of solid walls and view fencing may be used along
the street and channel frontages. Parking areas may be screened from view from the
street by either solid walls or landscape materials. A minimum six foot high, decorative
masonry wall will be necessary along both public streets to reduce the noise levels
impinging on the residential uses, thereby exceeding the Zoning Ordinance Standards.
Liahtina
On -site lighting shall be designed to be consistent with the City's "Dark Sky"
ordinance. Vehicular entries from both Washington Street and Avenue 50 shall
be lighted in a manner that will make them apparent and stand out at night.
Pedestrian walkways and entries shall be lighted using either decorative fixtures
or landscape lighting. See Exhibit 14.
All lighting shall be designed and located so as to confine direct light within the
project boundaries (including landscape buffer areas located along Washington
Street and Avenue 50.) Landscape lighting is preferable to area light standards.
30 - March 2011
434
UnId 014100aS
UVJOIt7d O.j -
twsm00 wd -U* (w w
omvo•aat ...�a.me.oe000c
4lglux3 4uownuow puo 'aoueA 'IIDM
=oN vS
�w Vjp
E L 1181HX3
° x ;
80<°
of
l.i.T.\
I
Z�
gllall
p .
vi
OWy(
f
R
435
uold Z>!dl0edS
owo�od o1
ur>Id
mu+acaw•.a.msoacau�a�
asuw•�nm.a...m.oe�eeoac
mo�.m..V
o vsw
trL UlIHX3
Z�
436
La Paloma Specific Plan 200"71 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
:SECTION IV CIRCULATION
La Paloma proposes to develop the adjacent street system in a manner
consistent with the.City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation. The property is
located on Washington Street, designated by the City's General Plan as a Major
Arterial requiring a half street of 60 feet. The site also abuts Avenue 50
designated as a Primary Arterial for which the General Plan calls for a half street
of 55 feet.
OFF -SITE CIRCULATION SYSTEM
The existing conditions around the site include partial improvements on both
abutting public streets. The General Plan standards for improvements which will be
required in conjunction with this project are consistent with other recent road
improvements for both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The construction of the
required improvements will continue the process of implementing the adopted
General Plan Circulation Plan.
Expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median and sidewalk/bike path improvements are
planned for the project's two street frontages. Signal upgrades may be required in
addition to relocation to the ultimate improvement location.
Exhibits 15A and 15B show the proposed cross sections for the streets affecting the
project.
ON -SITE CIRCULATION SYSTEM
The 14 acre site will be serviced by a perimeter drive which has two basic
functions: fire department access to all buildings and service vehicle access to
the projects delivery area located on the north side of the facility. The nature of
the operation of this complex will entail approximately five delivery trucks per day
,with all deliveries being scheduled during normal working hours (9:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m)
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Bus turnouts and shelters may be required as a part of the project's public street
improvements pursuant to requirements of Sunline Transit and the Public Works
Department. Prior to issuance of building permits for individual Site Development
Permits, applicants shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan
to the Public Works and Community Development Departments. The plans shall
address capital improvement and operational standards as set forth in the City's
TDM Ordinance. Any transit related improvements required by the Sunline Transit
Agency as a condition- to development will not constitute compliance with the plan
submittal requirements.
K*l
March 2011
431
z
V1
=�o
0
N
�-I
m
m
m
H
m
m
n
H
0
Z
Z
m
X
D
EXHIBIT 15A
e
a
n
c
F�
�il�
/`II
MSA CoNwLmNo, ixc
Washington Street Cross Sections
Lco Polor"cl
Specific Plow
� Cw jmw • p- (M �" m
438
mrub
m—
�Z�
� C 4
m
Ml
T
z
a5
EXHIBIT 15B
DI
m
?Z
N C
m
2
qr%
MSA C0Nsmrua6, INC
,�.�.�.. a m®... �.....�
Avenue 50 Street Cross Sections
M10.bm.no..-R. kft. .Ck9m
T � (M "°°°" F" (UM UW94 '
Lci Pc3lOma
Specific Plan
439
uold o!dlC)adS
rowojrod col
a44al�d ��-+�Id
uusawFu..a•,Qa�nuD®Rw
Ru`r„°r.wemY"°'Ra'as"°°ou`
SOD vs'K"a
9l 1191HX3
NI4iQY0
iTMNiMQrLTMMiI/YIII®i
ON Q/{iMNi1NlORMimliFlYi NI _
_[�afwm,Qoo .sarF wa®atv aFo,wFm,r DYFUMA
aMwMmni'u LDODJ®era{as ad
--
r
--
�
"to,
i
,FuwoYC Q„�gws,r®Qn O.f DHDtYDYraQORr Fell••
__ - -
I we,
r
v"aw �Q
v RQ
r {m
Q
R
Ca
rQ••wF ®FFwf,rt•DDObOQt ri
- .. wruenvoruoora,a amfaa{Qylrr m 11
Muinw„auti �awoFwrmn Fn
FYFRpIUWRJQ QIpDY(lq 0a
�-ao,
---gym,
m,
� �� -m,
r"oa
Y v,
r wi-{-e
o
trro{r tlwD•�uYDmetln ao
Dnoon to•ou•Rwoow F]f
-' �anrarnm .,ar,otaufv�en Y nr
-_.waeso _- aea{vr _F✓'/,`
.._ aQRaoMvrw--Q�Qir•ownwrm I
YTQIMOM �.WDMWYVIIMMgC{___�"/�1��\•I' I
-- I
-wot
T- ee�
w
-rsnr�_ma
-oQ,nr� _ma
'llRnr m{
rtnl-Te
r-Fm
rMM
f -R
ITO
_ —
_ms
�r_Ol ��
rsre.-•--_ YtWIWIgiN Yl
mO
--"m{�_l-ml-i__M
f ml
O
R
MCl1TJM{-]ILIMO]INBaNNQYY- -NY
-_----_YLNUYOfG'--.-_`-___XfM1YiMQl➢IL�-_LL
____- iYelFJDI YMIORfIQIAlIi _9
�iwrwM. QoiO�FTM lF
—IQ1Q911/IRi R•Wli®NFL{Y _{Y
-�rra{aw•ano -'- aww�wR{wn11r �r
wo,Qumvv�FerRo __.ri�wm,rmtaQwnre,"st
f ml �
�--m•
_
m•
r te,�=D
—7-me
"'--t--me
i /Ol
i of
®
jm
a
-m,�r-o,
me
(rm
�r-MI
r'ml
�t
�•
R
Q
aR{rlQ wwiaaravpQ.laaFwlr -_.rY
--M1Q,QB1{WR OWFOQ{QI -W
-=ioaitlr,auwr -. Qrw,mFa, -._a•
a{,o,r� --=vwaarwwro, - ,Q
--T..mO
-ma�
-----•-m4
_(-bl
rm,_�®
RQ
P Oi,
___rwD,® aiDtiYmeQw-w
_RAQ,I OY _JQImLiMT•RJ'DYiiQ1 -Yil
11Y11WMY YYQOMYiT,Q-NI
--{,[FRna DWlla]QIiYWIbt QllWV9Q, -n
- a{aaw.MRn -_-LG'•IFI'JMlll/l -an
--nt tew vx aw R,rFDnn wnwm� Fn
'_mo
�
i Q
_
I� m9�e
I me
m•
__ _mv
m•
rlvl
e-aQ�o
r w
Q
a
—_ _. Kiev
ma
-r •vl
(rsn
a
•
-. ivavn,oioaoo_r_uvvaourwnuxmm -W1
_amauoivrxDl {morlm{r Fr
-mr�
'-T09 �
iFm
-(_YR1-. T
(rO1
I •.YOI_�
a
_..--rsurofQ.---1Yll4llole{�oIF{{{+ AM
----'/31110j1-.--_MOlM4iMIBo1 N
______NWXAIQY{O _�_-_.y_IIIYM�VIIOYYwa
� _ � IQIeiWtQYgalll YlG'N 0
MRV II® ,QCiQ101f4r -/1
-__HLLRNONfYR1 QQr01 M11fpRU-b
-iQM1�000�1 -_ 91Y_QO,YMYXl6--IIC
M0IDJMIT1111 Ylp{WJYQp9 m
_ __ _ _ _N,i YQY -•- YaIOBIIY,D ID
_ YIQIrO-YN\y91YQV'YYyp-Ia0
iT'aMID1® YM1arYAKJ YN
D
) O
mY
__ ml
--_ _m� -i-I
--ml'I(110'1
__ _ 1100
" _ml
A
I R
atl
1.
I a, Ol
Zol
� P RQ
a
t
1
M
_gym•
mt
(FOI
r"am
I Cl
_ _
YiIJNWYL -QY{IW� - PJ
-wuaveum wm{wvemr w
-. _mQnau v,viwumvw�aw -oa
_- __rmwnuloF _.--. .Ylvnvnr{va{--b
- ao{w,�no-aybQllDlm.QYYQFF 'FQ
__OgIYF,l1FDll —_-.Y_t_W_IILL1Q'IYFr _-M .
_ BOMmJRIa --�YIR�FlF M
®Y{Ill®O 1OY,QQM@E{'. RO
mol '— urFlaMl-Yw
`DMYWWiO _ ----------- Or/
-_ smBIU-lq*O
m•
Q
_
T- eo• �
T-m•
_-�.-.mf
-- .-ml
1 mf �
-i mi
v"tru
vm,
�iFOI
({OI
� OI
(-{ol
r•ql
---
�a
s
•
1.Or�_-
I R
� •
Q
I ma
m•
ma
- ,-
M
_MFM T I 1WD1
4ml
F
IfOt M,I_Q,OrfO _ VIGIYQOIOeM i_
�mvnQ wa
jI� f-m, �o
_�—,rrwvnQ MOfYWIfD){ -
-=•
� -_ Fmwrallaml - O{IFaaDFMe--
aat4s FaJ\�
dY{1FC1 �ON+N y
v P-m
P W1--�F
Q
,a¢M MHIYY m
9RIll1,MRl�__MY,d[NMO[O _
-QOUM�'1-,-OlM
(-aOl
- ---�1®YML itO09Y,�O�{IW
R
FnuvnQTar
4oFIDoITrG{ �
TT s:rrn
avowvmT�osw
�r w_J_{
r �m
i rol
�
ww F{,o _
, _ iJMO'lH„I,iNl,iaa _wvalwuvamaRF,IQRIIn I
- umr�n ®noa� auoQ�mnnnwrFaPi '.
,vRaast� nwwaw •Y
1
o
s?
av_nwolTm�w
r of
0
Ftr•eoQ easx
� r o�
Q
- -_
- •n,,.warm6 __ _ ,rtiome,,uor _
- N11olL� - -—vrn{aYolol`,w
aron{voi 1 mvaouf
�r g
�
� •
CN3D31 11Kk
l
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 - City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
SECTION'V. DESIGN GUIDELINES";.
LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS
The landscape concept follows a "lush oasis" theme while emphasizing water
efficient materials exhibiting color and form. A planting palette is shown in Exhibit
16. Entry areas are treated with a formal layout of Date Palms and Shoestring
acacias with a feature fountain at each that will utilize re -circulated water and
concealed basins to conserve water. Perimeter areas are treated more informally
and include mounding with random massing of shade trees such as Palo Verde
and Thornless Cascalote with groupings of shrubs such as Texas Ranger,
Bougainvillea and Lantana to soften the 6' perimeter plaster wall with ancient
pilasters that will match the contemporary architecture.
Courtyards are each treated individually with separate themes and activities to
differentiate spaces. Overall courtyards may be treated with a more lush plant
palette due to shaded conditions brought about by the multi story buildings. Lawn
is limited to usable active areas, in an effort -to keep water use to a minimum. The
landscape concept is shown in Exhibit 17.
SIGNAGE
Project identification signs are anticipated at each entry. The signage will be
consistent with City of La Quinta sign ordinance requirements except for slightly
larger directional signs at each entry. Such` signs shall be architecturally
integrated with the wall and landscape designs and limited to one project
identification sign on each frontage with no more than 24 square feet of sign face
per sign. Other minor signs will be consistent with City or state/federal
requirements. See Exhibit 28 for main project signs and directional signage.
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL THEME
The project will feature a desert contemporary theme in shades of tan, gold, gray
and blue. Stucco will be the primary exterior building material. The project will
have one and.two story buildings plus architectural projections at the entry area.
Stone elements will be incorporated at the project entry and at each primary
entry to the building. The stone element will also be utilized for low seating areas,
fountains and shading devices. The simple palette of materials will enhance the
desert contemporary architecture style. All the materials are selected for their
ability to withstand the extreme temperatures in the desert. See Exhibit 21.
-36-
March 2011
441
R
4L�e�
Icy(
5(/j
mP i. i
t'
�,l
^
t L •
id
1 � �
J
R
f;,
,� � i; , �
l
,, ,• r :;
L
3 1
r �
•
a
MEE
•
..
�1
Il..m.
R ir
s A
S:
j
_
y y
2
I
m
2 P C
y A n
k
y+
t
.,
t
.�y
k
3 eN
N
I- Nw
n
o
!
Jit
:ar
0.4
Oop s
i
t !
i
� `*.L la Palom a �.
1 e{ WaNirptm SUret 9lre- ' U Wx "Orina 93353
P
ancre. raema •
EXHIBIT 21
i€ itrisl
euom
FN to. o... coNsue.mmm . m'jomir smeo
Architectural Perspectives
Lo Paiomco
specific Plan
�aao ea eu. m... �..�•�m.®.amlo
m�nem>avo�•p..amas�J
Elm
>
>
A
p e tAi
A
Z D 2 ,
P
2
2 P C
P A
�
m
P
T
m
A
y
D
A.
v yiiii::-.t �, l� Evgs pF Sije: i3gr.t••.it�
1If fixi a tii
a;g}sgssti6� gt €ascglslygl�§t$ it
d i�itlki a€!.S y83723a "i i;.
ia..--_C___..__' t..__'__..__e.......
95E5 ke l9 E3l �� v:S C5ttit: Ciii[!]i5 41
:3Bt3 t:l CC:G12�e.2Y[d.:6Yiidtti:3 _
a
1fggiEai�!`:itE,�`e�g
a i§iil�
t. v
i
:�t� itSi3tt Ei 5eif4ti it,![ dl 6in sEC, ;
' �3lS6�1814 jt'lif
1M18; I tP I
i t
agl iY61Afl1i4,aAil
a;'�
it
• `��d;'3�i'ii9€cygg gtrx���lyi�
� I
Ir'
- Ci e£•CSr:e?+8'?3; i1E3 1e 9:.F jjj 3
I
!.i Y
il!
it
0
0
i
La Patom
wasmrotm kM1lf aA.e�we W.tnQmm� ewuomw vusi lCIP.fl9
EXHIBIT 22
MSA CONMLTMO, INC Main Building Plan - 1 st Floor
4uAnw . ay. mmmaY . I.m tm..Ym
YYmtl ee•su.iLt4Y. wt>o 1m.A.a oaA La Pc3lomc3
Tn CMR,MANNA 'P.ic mYa46l Spacific Plan
441
>
ago
a
o v 0
j?
Z
U$
y
i
_
Z~
_
11 M
x
J
<->
La Faloma
so vzzv
ANN
EXHIBIT 33
448
MSA CONSULTING, INc
Main Building Floor Plan - 2nd Floor
Lc3 Pc3lomo
Specific Plcin
umo as m. m.. •f,®�m.m.a mso
m:m tmW mosm • F.. owe msm
2
4�
'�I
aA
a
MEN
MIL
f
l
y = y
z9
F'
N
o
i I
N
5
O\�`I
W€.
�a'l
:r-r;,
k
; L6 Paloma
wa iqo See @lven e50 aQWmat darn 9U53
pa.u. YL-SA4Mmmtleb. Ln 19
Iy
LnflM UOIDY
1 z
EXHIBIT 24,
CONSIMMNO.INC
Main Building Elevations
Ramaa9"•wwa@"m ®.avmQ
MAC.,
VV 'Ru("MMM
La Pcilomco
Spaciflc Plan
44c,
a
MEN
a
O A
i n x
A �
_
y Z •
=2
_ 9
to
2 —I
z c>c
n A
m
n
T
V
m
r j
n
N
N Viii. II
m i
La Paloma
WaWngion Sow E tense W, u Wnu California 92259
w�i upa.:e. ut.msum.w .s, �. rm
un,eM, uamm
EXHIBIT 25
MSA CONSULTING. INC
Cottage "A I" - Floor Plan and Elevation
Lci Poiomo
Specific Ptan
FAVIN
,nro,sm,m,,�m,mm,Gvr„
+*� • "� m^a
450
La Patoma
Wav NtonStreet4,.ewWQWCalM nia9253
w4 Q ,., .1 - . .—. .,. .11, 3.
EXHIBIT 26
MSA CoNsuLmNa, INN
Cottage "AT- Floor Plan and Elevation
ov
T� CM 32MM - Pm CMD) 3MI93
Lci Pc3ic::>mc3
Sp4ag--Iflc Plan.
ZI
1
451
Da
Z
[
1
la Paloma
e L
waLuagmn Sven a Al 50 to Qnnu Calll^mla 93153
EXHIBIT 27
ID.,,�,A,,,,
n.MSMSA Coxs[n ruaa, INC
om ®woo . 0 w.mo
Cottage "B" - Floor Plan and Elevation
®�a,�
TM� � •"•�°0 a'A°3
Lco Polomco
Specific Plcm
452
K7e
\k|
m
1
r% MSA CoNsuL7v4o, INC
Monument and Directiona I Sign Exhibit
v (70 no'm - (M 3w
L4--s.
1 1 SPOCKIC P IC3n
453
APPENDIX ONE
GENERAL PLAN ANALYSIS
454
La Palma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN POLICIES
The General Plan of the City of La Quinta includes Goals, Policies and Programs that
were deemed by the City necessary to properly implement the plan. Following is an
evaluation of the key policies and programs (in Italics) that affect the development of the
subject property and project compliance.
LAND USE ELEMENT
Land Use Goals, Policies and Programs
Program 4.2. ° For approved Specific Plans, the Director of Community Development
shall have the ability to determine the substantial conformance in the
Specific Plan, and waive the need for a Specific Plan Amendment under
the following circumstances".
• When changes in the land use allocation within the Specific Plan are less than
5%.
■ When no new land use is proposed,
• When the off -site circulation pattern and turning movements will not be altered by
the proposed changes.
The La Paloma Specific Plan provides methods for alterations to the Plan that conforms
to the guidelines of the General Plan.
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Traffic and Circulation Goals, Policies and Programs
Program 2.2 Review new and redevelopment projects along Washington Street,
Adams Street and Highway 111 with the intent of limiting, access and
aligning and or consolidating access drives in a manner which minimizes
conflicting turning movements and maximizes the use of existing and
planned signalized intersections.
Program 4.2 When reviewing development proposals, consult and coordinate with the
SunLine Transit Authority and solicit comments and suggestions on how
bus stops and other public transit facilities and design concepts, including
enhanced handicapped access, should be integrated into project
designs.
-1-
455
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
Policy 13.1 Primary Image Corridors in the shall include: Washington Street, Jefferson
Street, Highway 111, Fred Waring Avenue and Eisenhower Drive from
Avenue 50 to Washington Street.
Policy 13.2 Secondary Image Corridors shall include: Miles Avenue, Dune Palms Road,
south of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, Adams Street, south of
the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, Avenue 48, 50 and 52 and
Eisenhower Drive, south of Calle Tampico to Avenida Bermudas.
Policy 14 In order to preserve the aesthetic values on the City's streets, minimum
landscape setbacks shall be as follows:
Highway 111: 50 feet
Other Major Arterials & Collectors Streets: 10 feet
Policy 15 The City shall maintain building height limits along Primary, Secondary, and
Agrarian Image Corridors in its Development Code.
The La Paloma Specific Plan provides for controlled access to the perimeter streets.
The Access points are in compliance with the policies on intersection spacing. The Plan
also provides for the improvements and construction of pavement, curb, gutter, median
and sidewalk/bike path plans to Washington Street and Avenue 50.
NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Air Quality Goals, Policies and Programs
Program 5.4 SunLine Transit Agency shall continue to review site plans for new
development to assure adequate and properly located bus turnouts, bus
lanes and other mass transit facilities, where necessary.
The La Paloma Specific Plan intends to accommodate Public Transportation pursuit to
requirements by SunLine Transit and the Public Works Department.
Water Resources Goal, Policies and Programs
Program 4.2 The City shall continue to coordinate with CVWD in its review of projects
which impact drainage channels.
The La Paloma development has on -site water lines that will connect into the existing
infrastructure in two places to avoid "dead end" lines.
2 456
La Paloma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1,
NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Surface Water & Storm Drainage Goal
Policy 3 All new development shall include on -site retention/detention basins and other
necessary stormwater management facilities to accommodate runoff from the
100-year storm.
The La Paloma project intents to retain on -site 100% containment of.100-year storm
flows and nuisance Water'.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ELEMENT
Geologic and Seismic Hazards Goal, Policies and Programs
Policy 2 Development in areas subject to rockfall, landslide, liquefaction and or other
associated hazards, as depicted in the MEA, shall be required to prepare
detailed geotechnical analyses whichr include mitigation measures designed to
reduce potential hazards below levels of significance.
Policy 4 The City shall coordinate and cooperate with the Coachella Valley Association
of Governments (CVAG) to identify and implement methods to reduce the
hazards associated with fugitive dust and blowing sand.
Policy 5 To minimize the hazards associated with ground shaking and other seismic
events, all new structures shall be built in accordance with the latest version of
the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and or International Building Code.
The La Paloma Specific Plan will abide by the SCAQMD requirements in the
development of the project. A Geotechnical investigation was performed by .Earth
Systems. Construction shall conform to the recommended measures and standard
construction practices.
Flooding and Hydrology Goal, Policies and Procedures
Policy 5.1 At the discretion of CVWD, new development shall continue to be required to
construct on -site retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater
management facilities that are capable of managing 100-year stormwater
flows. New development immediately adjacent to the Coachella Valley. Water
Stormwater Channel shall continue to have the option of discharging the 100-
year stormwater flows directly into the stormwater channel.
The La Paloma development will have underground on -site storage retention.
IBM
457
La Palma Specific Plan 2004-071 City of La Quinta
Amendment No.1
Noise Goal, Policies and Procedures
Policy 2 New or redevelopment projects proposing sensitive receptors and located on
arterial roadways whose CNEL levels are expected to exceed the City
standard at buildout (see Table 8.2) and who do not propose mitigation shall
be required to prepare a noise impact analysis to mitigate noise levels to
meet or exceed City standards.
A Noise Study was prepared by Urban Crossroads. The development will comply to the
recommended measure and standard construction practices.
CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Program 3.2.1 Require all proposed project sites to be surveyed by a qualified
archaeologist, historian, and or architectural historian, as appropriate,
to identify any potential cultural resources that may be affected, unless
the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that such survey is
unnecessary.
-4- 458
APPENDIX TWO
ADOPTED RESOLUTIONS / ORDINANCES
459
ATTACHMENT 3
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
June 14, 2011
CALL TO ORDER
7:03 P.M.
A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to
order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Alderson.
PRESENT: Commissioners Barrows,
Alderson.
ABSENT: Commissioners Weber.
Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Les Johnson, City Attorney Kathy
Jenson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Planning
Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Andrew
Mogensen, Associate Planner Jay Wuu, and
Executive Secretary Carolyn Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT:
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA:
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
There being no comments, or suggestions, it was moved by
Commissioners Wilkinson/Barrows to approve the minutes of April 26,
2011 as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Wilkinson and
Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners Quill,
and Weber. ABSTAIN: None.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Environmental Assessment 2010-610, Specific Plan 2004-
071,Amendment No. 1, Site Development Permit 2003-762,
Extension No. 4, and Amendment No. 1; a request by WSL La Quinta,
LLC, for consideration of development plans for La Paloma, a 208-unit
senior living community located on the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Avenue 50.
9M
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department.
Commissioner Quill joined the meeting at 7:07 p.m.
Planning Director Johnson stated staff had just a received a letter,
from MSA Consulting, and needed time to review the changes
requested in the letter. (Copy distributed to the Commissioners). He
recommended the Commission take public testimony and continue the
item to the next meeting to allow adequate time for Planning and
Public Works staff to review and adequately respond to the request.
Chairman Alderson noted the suggestion and asked if there were any
questions of staff.
There being none from other Commissioners, Chairman Alderson
asked for clarification on the height of the towers and what the client
was requesting.
Staff responded the client was asking for 36-feet, instead of 28-feet,
on the one tower feature, which would be the highest projection.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any violations with parking.
Staff responded there were no violations and commented on carports
and proper shading for parking areas without carports.
Chairman Alderson commented on the north property line and the new
fence planned. Staff said the plans called for a new wall spanning the
entire northern property line. Where there were fences or existing
walls, it would be up to the property owners to work out an
agreement with La Paloma to tear down and replace those walls.
There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Alderson opened
the public hearing portion of the meeting and asked if the applicant
would like to speak.
Mr. John Rimbach, President of West Living (WSL La Quinta, LLC),
5796 Armada Drive, Suite 300, Carlsbad, CA 92208, introduced
himself and said they were the owners of the site, and then gave
some background on acquisition of the property. He explained the
461
-2-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
previous plans and said they were now designing this project as a
straight rental project with a full continuum of care, residential -based
care from independent living, assisted living, and a small
Alzheimer/dementia component. They have eliminated the nursing
home component from the prior project plan. The project is now
deemed to be more affordable and more economically viable, than the
previous project plans. He then explained the licensing requirements
and said his development team would come up to answer questions
and give further details on the project.
Chairman Alderson asked Mr. Rimbach about the new plan for rental,
instead of sales, of the units. He then asked about the monthly rates
on the units. Mr. Rimbach explained the continuum of care within the
project and said the monthly rates had not yet been established.
Gregory Irwin, Irwin Partners Architects (IPA) 245 Fischer Avenue,
Suite B-2, Costa Mesa CA 92626, introduced himself and said they
had spent a lot of time looking at what was previously approved and
tried to create a project that would make them better neighbors than
what was previously approved. He had one correction, noting the
tower entry piece was actually below the height limit. The difference
between the roof and what would make it an architectural projection
was off. He then explained further why it was still within the actual
height limit.
Chairman Alderson asked about the color palette and the blue element
shown, which was actually clear glass and not an additional color
element. Mr. Irwin confirmed it was glass.
Discussion followed on the color palette, the garage doors and the use
of opaque glass.
Mr. Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, 34-20 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho
Mirage, CA - introduced himself and said they had been the project
engineers on this property since 1987. He then gave some
background, on the property. He commented on the letter they
submitted saying it actually was only about four comments, because
some of the items were just notations. He understood the staff's
need to review the letter since there were concerns from their
southern neighbor, UHC, who had a representative present to discuss
it from their perspective. He then commented on the following letter
points:
3 462
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
• Driveway alignment on Avenue 50
• Left in/left out movements
• Improvements on Avenue 50, east of their proposed entry
• Direct discharge into the evacuation channel
• A u turn lane southbound on Washington
• A uniform wall on the northern boundary
• Dropping the site and including a retaining wall.
General discussion then followed regarding dropping the site,
importing fill, and the design of the retaining wall.
Mr. Roos also stated the letter requested that the site development
permit approval be for two years, rather than one, and explained why.
Mr. Ron Gregory - Project Landscape Architect with RGA Landscape
Architects - 74020 Alessandro Drive, Palm Desert, CA - introduced
himself and commented on the earlier statements made regarding the
multitude of fountains within the project, as well as the mention of the
lawn area. He explained how they have to figure water calculations,
as required by the State, the Water District, and the City. He said
they have to use a water factor for different types of plant materials,
and that is also used for fountains. He explained how the factors
were utilized for any body of water as well as all landscaping. He
continued by saying water, and especially in smaller recirculating
water features, will be very important to people who will be living
there. So, he hoped that would be taken into consideration. He told
how a question was brought up, at ALRC, regarding the use of turf for
the putting green and the pool area. The turf that is being used on the
putting green is all faux turf, and will require no water. The turf that is
being used in the pool area is real turf and is cooler. Faux turf is
actually as hot as a paved surface would be. He added that even with
the use of real turf, they still fit within the maximum water use
guidelines. The rest of their landscaping was all water -efficient and
desert -type material.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked about recovering the condensation off
of air conditioning and using it to fill fountains, etc.
Mr. Gregory said their Firm was currently working on two projects
taking that into account and the problem was that it was
extraordinarily expensive.
-4- 463
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
General discussion followed regarding the recovery of air conditioning
condensation and various components of LEED certification.
General discussion followed on faux turf versus real turf, and under
what circumstances their individual uses are appropriate.
Commissioner Barrows asked for Mr. Gregory's comments on why
more native species are not being used and gave some examples of
non-native species that are used frequently in their place.
Mr. Gregory gave anecdotal evidence of projects he was currently
working on using native species. He said one of the problems with
native plants was that some of them had a very short shelf life. A
plant such as brittle bush requires a fair amount of maintenance and
doesn't tend to last as long as some of the non-native species. The
other problem was that the native plants typically put on a great show
in late winter and early spring, then they weren't at their best the rest
of the year. He said they were trying to introduce more of them,
especially as they are being encouraged to do so in the pursuit of
higher LEED scores. He added there was a problem with finding a
sufficient quantity of native plants for projects of this size.
Commissioner Barrows said this project seemed like a really good
opportunity to use native plants. She then asked about the water
features and commented on staff's recommendations that the smaller
water features seemed appropriate but they were concerned about the
entry water feature. The entry water feature only provided an
aesthetic benefit and no other usage, such as folks walking over and
sitting around the feature. She asked for Mr. Gregory for his
perspective on that feature.
Mr. Gregory said, at first, he didn't understand what was meant by
more than just an aesthetic feature, but he now understood about
people gathering around and enjoying the benefits of the water
feature.
General discussion followed on:
• What other purposes the water feature could/should serve.
The current design of the water feature
• Additional discussion of the recycling of air conditioning
condensation and its possible uses.
-5- 464
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any more questions of the
applicant.
There being none he asked if there was any public comment.
Mr. David Pendergrass, representative for James A. Shirley
Construction Co., 5462 Jurpe Avenue, Riverside CA - introduced
himself and commented on how much he appreciated the fact that
staff, and the developer, worked with him to have an opportunity to
competitively bid on a project like this. He said it was just such a
difference from what he had previously experienced in other
communities. He wanted to take the opportunity to say thank you
and added that it was good that the City apparently was working with
local contractors and because of that his firm supported a project like
this.
Chairman Alderson said it was very good to hear that local people
were being considered.
Mr. Mark Irving- Urban Housing Communities, 2000 East Fourth
Street, Suite 205, Santa Ana CA 92705 - introduced himself and said
he was at the meeting for several purposes. First, he was
representing the owners of the property to the south of this project,
who were also part of the specific plan originally approved in 2004.
He stated they were still under that specific plan.
He continued, with his second point, saying he was at the meeting to
try to protect the left in on their property, currently within the specific
plan. The ingress into the property would be on Avenue 50,
otherwise they just have right ins and right outs. So, it is very
important to make sure they maintain that. Third, his firm was in
support of the applicant's project. Fourth, they were asking staff to
review the condition of approval regarding realigning the driveways
and providing ingress and egress. He said they were supportive of
that effort. Fifth, he agreed with the location and use of the entry
fountain. He explained a similar situation where the fountain acted as
a noise buffer and he agreed with the current design.
Chairman Alderson asked if there was any further public comment.
There being none, Chairman Alderson did not close the public hearing
since the matter was going to be continued. He suggested a
-6- 465
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
continuation of two weeks to allow time for staff to review this as the
letter had not been received until late afternoon on the day of the .
meeting.
Planning Director Johnson asked the Chairman if either he, or any of
the other Commissioners, had any items for staff to discuss with the
applicant, prior to the continued meeting, to bring them forward so
staff would have that opportunity.
Chairman Alderson said he would like staff to clarify the alignment of
the driveways and confirm whether the project on the south was still
included in the specific plan.
Commissioner Quill commented on several items:
• This was a more viable project than the previous one.
He agreed with the approval of the Site Development Permit for
two years, instead of one.
• There should be real turf where there is a recreational
component (i.e., swimming pools).
He agreed with Commissioner Barrows' comments regarding
the use of native species.
He agreed with direct discharge, into the channel, if there were
no issues involved, it was done under an SWPPP, and the
water was cleaned up as it went out.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to continue the public
hearing recommending approval of Specific Plan 2004-071,
Amendment No. 1, to June 28, 2011.
AYES:. Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2011-103; a request by the City of La
Quinta for consideration of the following amendments to the La Quinta
Municipal Code: A clarification regarding the location of certain
landscaped parkways (§9.50.100), Correcting an error regarding guest
houses and secondary units (§9.140.070), Adjusting the time
extension period for development review permits (§9.200.080),
Deletion of obsolete language referencing guesthouse examples
-7- 466
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
(§9.210.010), Revised definitions of child day care uses to be
consistent with State Law (§9.280.030), and Extend the maximum
permitted cul-de-sac length to 1320 feet (§13.24.070), to be effective
City -Wide.
Principal Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the staff report, a copy
of which is on file in the Planning Department.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Quill had no questions but commented on the positive
nature of the change for the permitted cul-de-sac length going from
660 to 1320 feet.
Chairman Alderson said he had no further questions, but did mention
staff did a good job of analysis in clearing up these items.
There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Alderson noted
the City was the applicant and asked if there was any public
comment.
There being none, Chairman Alderson closed the public hearing and
opened the matter for Commission discussion.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2011-004 recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment
2011-103 as submitted in the staff report.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Barrows/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2011-005 recommending approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment
2011-103, cul-de-sac amendment as submitted in the staff report.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
-8- 461
Planning Commission Minutes
June 14, 2011
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS: None
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None
Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Discussion of the recent City Council Meetings. It was decided the
meetings of June 7, and June 21, 2011 would be discussed at the
next regularly scheduled Commission meeting.
B. Commissioner Wilkinson is scheduled to attend the June 21, 2011,
City Council meeting.
C. The new City Council Meeting Attendance Schedule will be included in
the June 28, 2011, packet.
D. A brief discussion of the Summer Schedule was held. It was decided
it would be discussed further, and date(s) chosen, at the next regularly
scheduled Commission meeting.
IX: DIRECTOR ITEMS: None
X. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, it was moved by Commissioners
Wilkinson/Barrows to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning
Commission to the next meeting to be held on June 28, 2011. This meeting
was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. on June 14, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn Walker, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
9 468
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
June 28, 2011 7:03 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to
order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Alderson.
PRESENT: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson; and Chairman
Alderson.
ABSENT: Commissioner Weber:.
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Les Johnson, City Attorney Kathy
Jenson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Planning
Manager . David Sawyer, "Associate Planner Jay
Wuu, and Executive Secretary Carolyn Walker.
II. PUBLIC COMMENT„
III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR:
There being no',,comments, or suggestions, it was moved by
Commissioners Battows/Wilkinson to approve the minutes of June 14,
2011 as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson
and Chairman Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner
Weber. ABSTAIN: None.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Continued Environmental Assessment 2010-610 Specific Plan 2004-
071 Amendment No 1 Site Development Permit 2003-762,
Extension No. 4, and Amendment No. 1; a request by WSL La Quinta,
LLC, for consideration of development plans for La Paloma, a 208-unit
senior living community located on the northeast corner of
Washington Street and Avenue 50.
469
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
Chairman Alderson reminded the audience that the public hearing was
opened at the last meeting and left open. He then asked for the staff
report.
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department. Staff pointed out the
revised conditions memo submitted by the Public Works Department
distributed to the Commissioners prior to this meeting.
Commissioner Barrows asked staff to provide ;a brief overview of the
changes.
Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer said the Public "Works Department
amended three conditions:
• Condition 52 - clarified that there would be two; elements to
the CVWD permit, an indemnification agreement and that the
developer would be required to cover any costs associated with
sampling any stormwater, if so required by the Water Quality
Control Board.
• Condition 25.a.1.g. changed the required benchmark from
Class 1, Level I to a Class Il, Level II benchmark, deemed to be
more appropriate for this project.
• Condition 25.a.2.d - clarified that the applicant would only be
responsible for fifty percent of the raised landscape median
improvements along Avenue 50 and language was added
allowing for interim improvements.
Chairman Alderson asked staff to show the area in question on the
plans and staff did so.
Chairman -Alderson asked if these improvements would involve the
entiresoutherly portion of the project. Staff confirmed it was the
southerly frontage of the project. He said the applicant had requested
a left turn in and therefore the median would be constructed in a
manner that would accommodate that. He noted staff was in support
of the left turn in improvement.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked if that was where the retaining wall
was located. Planning Director Johnson replied it was not and he
470
-2-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
pointed out on the plans where the retaining wall was located.
Principal Engineer Wimmer added that it was not yet known whether
or not the retaining walls would be needed. He explained the
applicant was to take a second look at the situation to determine if the
retaining walls would be required from an engineering standpoint. He
noted it was not staff's intent to require very expensive retaining walls
for an interim improvement.
Chairman Alderson thanked staff for the answer and said he would
address the issue with the applicant to find out whether anything had
been determined.
Planning Director Johnson said: Attachment 6 to the staff report
discussed in detail, all of the ':amendments to the conditions of
approval. He noted three of :the conditions had already been
addressed with the memo by Public, Works. He explained the rest of
the amendments to the conditions of aipproval:
• Condition 3 — amended to make the Site Development Permit
valid for two years after City Council approval.
• Condition 14 — identified that Public Works would address the
dedications and right-of-way at the appropriate time during the
development process.
• Condition $ — maintained that a left out movement on Avenue
• Cond'a on 34` — maintained that the applicant must provide a
plan profile,for the `on -site street improvements; this did not
apply to interior driveways.
Principal Engineer 'Wimmer explained Condition 34 was meant in
particular for the storm drain on -site improvements and most likely
there would not be any need for a plan profile
Planning Director Johnson said this would conclude the response to
the original letter that was submitted to the Commission two weeks
ago, as the rest of the amended conditions were revised according to
Fire Department requirements.
Discussion followed regarding water pollutant removal systems.
411
-3-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
There being no further questions
opened the public hearing portion
applicant would like to speak.
of staff, Chairman Alderson re -
of the meeting and asked if the
Mr. Roger Green, Vice President of Development for West Senior
Living, 5796 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, CA, introduced himself and said
he was attending on behalf of Mr. John Rimbach, President of West
Living (WSL La Quinta, LLC), who was here for the last meeting, but
was unable to attend this evening.
Mr. Green thanked staff for their time and effort over the last two
weeks to get the conditions of approval modified and amended.
Mr. Green said he would like to clarify Condition 25 stating that the
applicant would not be responsible for; .any median improvements
related to the property to the south of the project. He noted that the
way the condition was currently worded was acceptable. He asked
Mr. Marvin Roos if he had anything to `add.
Mr. Marvin Roos, MSA Consulting, 34-200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho
Mirage, CA, introduced himself and said he would like to reiterate Mr.
Green's comments on commending staff for their time and efforts on
trying to workout the conditions of approval. He noted the conditions
were clarified as best as possible.
Mr. Roos said that a possible U-turn on southbound Washington Street
was requested`. by `the applicant and discussed with staff. Staff's
response was`that in an effort to maximize the intersection capacity, a
U-turn would not be.acceptable due to an existing right -turn overlap,
which would have" to. be eliminated in order to allow for the U-turn.
He asked that this issue be revisited at a later time when the project is
built out, so that the actual impact on traffic and street capacity could
be realistically measured.
Mr. Roos said that the applicant was supportive of staff's report and
Mr. Green's comments and would like to answer any questions from
the Planning Commission.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any questions. There being no
further questions he asked about the storm drain. Mr. Roos replied
the usage of the storm drains would be further explored and explained
the procedures that would have to be followed. He noted that the
41?
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
only reason the site plan would change was if a surface retention
system would have to be utilized.
Commissioner Barrows expressed a concern about the entry water
feature and inquired about its design. She explained the Commission's
position regarding water features and said the water feature at the
proposed location would only serve an aesthetic function as residents
would not be able to enjoy it. She suggested the water feature be
placed next to the entrance way or at another location where it could
be really appreciated.
Mr. Roos replied the water feature was a re -circulating vertical
fountain dropping water and explained its design: He said the
proposed location was the area where residents would be waiting to
take the bus and the element of water would enhance their
experience. He noted the Commission's, comments would be taken
into consideration and the applicant would not have any objections if
the Commission chose to add a condition that the entry way be
revised.
Commissioner Barrows thanked Mr: Roos for the explanation.
Mr. Mark Irving" Urban Housing Communities, 2000 E. Fourth Street #
205, Santa Ana, CA 92705„ introduced himself and said he was a
representative of, the owners `of r the property to the south of the
project. He said he was supportive of the project overall. He asked
for clarification on Condition 25a2d regarding a median being built and
asked for assurance that their right to implement a left turn -in would
be preserved, otherwise that would result in devaluation of the
property. He noted there were no objections to the proposed
widening of the road as there were no overall perceived impacts to
'their property. He said there was a significant amount of slope and
asked that it be taken into consideration in relationship to any retainer
walls.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked to see the area where the left turn -in
would be located.
Commissioner Quill said that the owner of the property to the south
would have to dedicate a right-of-way when the site was being
developed.
473
-5-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
Chairman Alderson said the left turn -in would have to be brought forth
for consideration at the time the property on the south was being
developed. He explained the Commission would take note of his
comments and concerns, however the Commission was not in a
position to provide any absolute assurance.
Mr. Irving said he understood that an assurance from the Commission
would not be possible. He noted that Planning Director Johnson
provided a letter stating that staff has acknowledged their position and
though nothing could be promised at this time, an effort would
certainly be made in the future to accommodate their request.
General discussion followed regarding .possible ways the street and
median improvements could be implemented, one of which included
building out the median to its ultimate intended use with the left turn -
in lane in place at this time. City Attorney Jenson explained that this
approach might require the City to advance the costs associated with
the improvements and.to have to seek reimbursement at some time in
the future and explained the difficulties'` associated with that. Further
discussion followed regarding possible reimbursement agreements, the
parties involved, and how they could be implemented.
Discussion followed regarding the currently available right-of-way
which- was not` sufficientto implement the required street
improvements.
Mn Roos said 'that they were able to reach an acceptable interim
'solution for the improvements with the Public Works Department. He
explained staff's concem that the full implementation of the street and
median improvements at this time would result in a left turn -in access
that was not clearly' identified.
Chairman Alderson asked if there were any more questions of the
applicant. There being none he asked if there was any public
comment. There being no public comments, he opened the matter for
Commission discussion.
Commissioner Wilkinson asked how the wording on Condition 25 was
corrected and if both parties were satisfied with the corrections made.
City Attorney Jenson replied Mr. Green would be responsible for
certain interim improvements unless he entered into an agreement
474
Ms
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
with the City stating he would not be responsible.
Mr. Roos said the wording was corrected as best as possible under
the circumstances.
Commissioner Quill asked the Public Works Department why a U-turn
lane could not be accommodated on Avenue 50 while traveling
southbound on Washington Street.
Staff replied that a U-turn lane could be accommodated. The issue
was that the traffic light could not support it due to the current right -
turn dedicated green arrow while traveling northbound on Washington
Street. Because the intent was to maximize the signal operation a U-
turn could not be accommodated.
Planning Director Johnson said this, use had,.,been discussed and the
prevailing opinion was to possibly give the U-turn signal a try when
the project was developed and measure the impact it would have on
the right -turn lane traffic exactly, in order, fo, determine for which one
there was a prevailing demand.
Commissioner Barrows asked if the Commission needed to address
this issue as. a Condition of 'approval. Staff replied there was no need
for a condition at this time.
Chairman . Aldersom commended the developer for the professional
presentation he presented and "for the well-done specific plan. He said
`he was very much. in favor of the project.
Commissioner Quill asked for clarification on Commissioner Barrows
comments on the proposed water feature.
Commissioner Barrows said she would like to see the proposed water
feature,in the circular drive either eliminated or re -located to a different
location where the residents would be able to enjoy it. She also said
she would like to see the use of native Colorado Desert species
incorporated into the plant palette, or some other type of native
species.
Commissioner Quill said the Commission had set a precedent for water
features in the past. He explained that usually the Commission would
like to see the use of water features in places where they could be
_�_ 475
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2011
enjoyed and appreciated by patrons and residents, and enhance the
ambiance of the area. This particular water feature provided neither in
the proposed location and was merely an additional expense. He
noted he would be in favor of a water feature located by the
recreation center area or the sitting area, but in the drive area it was
simply a waste of energy and water.
Chairman Alderson suggested the Commission condition the applicant
to propose an alternative treatment for the circular"turn around and to
include Mr. Gregory's comments from last week regarding working
with staff on using an alternative landscape planting material.
There was no further discussion and it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Quill/Wilkinson to approve Resolution 2011-006
recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 2004-
071, Amendment 1, subject the conditions submitted, with the
following revisions:
AYES: Commissioners; Barrows, Quill,Wilkinson, and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. , ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
There was no further discussion and it,Was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Quill/Wilkinson to approve Resolution 2011-007
recommending to the City Council approval of Site Development
Permit 2003-762, Extension 41, and Site Development Permit 2003-
762, Amendment 1, ,subject to the conditions submitted, with the
folloving revisions:
a. As part of the final Landscape Plan review process, the
applicant shall submit a revised plan for the main entrance
vehicular courtyard depicting either the removal of the water
feature within the drive aisle or relocation of the water feature
with an enhanced interactive design.
b. As part of the Final Landscape Plan review process, the
applicant shall submit a revised plant palette that reflects an.
increased use of Colorado Desert native type species of plants
and shrubs.
AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Quill, Wilkinson, and Chairman
Alderson. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN:
None.
476
ATTACHMENT 4
our proposed development located on 14+/- acres at
ton Street and Avenue SO in La Quinta. We are processing
ill service senior community that will consist of independent
y care units.
v . . s .
acquaint '
jWU
the northeast corner of Washinc
errfitlements with the City,for a 1
Ynt i nrn inui4ar4 4n n44anr1
the La QI
you with
AA _. F