2012 04 04 ALRCCity of La Quinta
ALRC Agendas are now
available on the City's Web Page
@ www.la-guinta.org
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
A Regular Meeting to be Held at the
La Quinta City Hall — Study Session Room
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California
APRIL 4, 2012
10:00 A.M.
Beginning Minute Motion 2012-003
CALL TO ORDER
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled
for public hearing. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit
your comments to three minutes.
III. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 4, 2012.
V. BUSINESS ITEMS:
A. Item .................
Applicant...........
Location............
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-863, AMENDMENT
NO. 1
AV Construction, LLC
North Side Avenue 58,
Street
'/4 Miles West of Madison
Request............. Consideration of Architectural, and Unit
Landscaping Plans for Alta Verde Coral Mountain
(Formerly Pasatiempo); Tract 34243.
Action ............... Staff Recommendation for Adoption of Minute
Motion Recommending Approval, with conditions -
Minute Motion 2012-
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
Vill. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS:
A. Planning Commission Update
IX. ADJOURNMENT:
This meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee will be
adjourned to a Regular Meeting to be held on May 2, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Carolyn Walker, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare
.that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Architectural and Landscaping Review
Committee meeting of Wednesday, April 4, 2012, was posted on the outside entry
to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and the bulletin board at the La
Quinta Cove Post Office, 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on Thursday March 29,
2012.
DATED: March 29, 2012
"6&4"
CAROLY ALKExecutive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
A special meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
January 4, 2012 10:02 a.m.
V
CALL TO ORDER
A. This regular meeting of the Architectural
Committee was called to order at 10:0
Les Johnson who led the Committee i
B. Committee Members Present:
Committee Member A
C. Staff present: Planning Director L
Wuu, Assistant Plan ,*Eric Ceja,
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
CONFIRMATIOI'
CONSENT
Staff a if tl
201
s ' ndad by
"` mitted.
Non 0. SENT:
BUSINESEN
AGEN
Lgndscaping Review
by Planning Director
salute.
Rooker
, Associate Planner Jay
ary Monika Radeva.
.x ges to the Minutes of December 14,
mments or corrections it was moved and
ers Rooker/McCune to approve the minutes
hittee Members McCune and Rooker. NOES:
Member Gray. ABSTAIN: None.
A. Site Dw `elopment Permit 2011-919 has been submitted by Lenity
Group, LLC. for consideration of Architectural, Site, and
Landscaping Plans for the La Quinta Memory Care Facility located
on Washington Street, north of Avenue 48.
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in
the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
Department.
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
Mr. Greg Elmore, Project Manager with Lenity Group, LLC., 471
High Street SE, Suite #10, Salem, OR, introduced himself and said
he was available to answer any questions the Committee might
have.
Committee Member Rooker asked if there was a practical need for
the proposed recreational garden/park area located to the north of
the project. He clarified that the windows would have a stucco
pop -out as indicated on the submitted p#os and a 24 inch
overhand around the entire building. ,�
Committee Member Rooker said the ject�!'_ s located in an elite
location and a highly visible lot fro, shmgtreet, and he did
not feel that the proposed p ecwould maftt*,an aesthetical
contribution to the neighbor�od. Fig suggested=fig project be
enhanced prior to approval.= w m`
Committee Member cCune asked •at the built-in outside white
units represented. ittee Mern ��"'o ooker replied those were
air conditioning units aa.''Y m . 'ned that a bit outdated, they
were very feasible for ,e p typ . f facility as each room
could be individually r ul " d would allow for energy
consery "'':: a units t would `t be used at the same time.
Co I Me "er MCCune ed the applicant to try to better
blend in t r in% its to the exterior of the building and
1M -the c.." st t he use of paint and landscaping.
CommittVlem cCune said he agreed with Committee
I
mber Rrrs mment that the roof line was a bit monotones.
wever, elieved that it could be adjusted and the lines could
b ftene � with the appropriate use of landscaping and plant
pale suggested that staff condition the applicant to upsize
all pro d trees to a minimum of 24 inch gallon -trunks.
Committee Member McCune asked that the applicant be
conditioned to enhance the landscape lighting by adding perimeter
and accent lighting throughout the project.
Committee Member McCune asked if the proposed park area to the
north of the project was a shared property with another developer.
Staff replied it was owned by the same developer.
P:\Reports - ALRC\2012�ALRC_44-12WLRC Min_14-12 Draft.doc 2
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
Committee Member McCune asked what the walkways in the
proposed park area would be covered with besides the identified
decomposed granite. Mr. Elmore replied the walkways would be
covered in ground cover and explained the several different options
that had been available for that lot and why the park was best
suitable under the current circumstances.
Committee Member McCune said he was no , posed to having the
park, but expressed that he was concer, ' about the park area
becoming a hang out spot for kids ofrk, particularly, due to
the lack of lighting.
Planning Director Les Johnson ginally th a to the north
would have been left undeve ad, bu due to sta i o erns and
recommendations, the park an int measure that parcel
until the property was built out
General discussion ft
the potential building
ig" ` ,_ size of the two lots and
lots' accommodate.
Committee Member Mc n. P'a s ' ` ere the proposed fencing
u
material be used'9,` Mr. EI re showed on the plans a
courty� area at wouldl a fenced off using those proposed
ee er said he was pleased with the proposed
lands pl: He asked that the applicant identify the type of
granite e u ;:..On the plans. He suggested a gold tone
ittee ember Rooker said he also liked the proposed
Ian i alette. He said he would like to see the rooms locate
on the'i"' rth.side, screened for privacy as much as possible with
landsc ping from the parking in the main entry way. Further, he
noted he would like to see the trellises identified on the south, east,
and west sides to be anywhere from 6 to 8 feet deep with some
architecturally decorative columns.
Mr. Elmore replied it was the applicant's intent to blend in the air
conditioning units with the exterior of the building even though that
was not clearly identified on the submitted plans.
P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC 4-4-12\ALRC Min_1.4-12 Draft.doe 3
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
Committee Member Rooker said the roof to the main entrance at
the front elevation on the north side should be enhanced to better
indicate that that was in fact the front entrance to the building. Mr.
Elmore explained in detail the plans for the entrance area and roof
design.
General discussion followed regarding the architectural design and
layout of the project.
There being no further discussion, it w roved and seconded by
Committee Members McCune/Roo to pt Minute Motion
2012-001, recommending appro� Site yelopment Permit
201 1-919, as submitted with t fol vying reco4` - ndations:
• Replace all 15-gallo e- s w* 24" bo) is on the
landscape plan
• Use a gold to decomposed bite throughout the site
• Extend the wi'` f the prop6'6 trellises, and cover with
landscape vines " `.
• Add more landscape fig rougut sidewalk areas
V �,t
AYES: e Memb McCur and Rooker. NOES: None.
ABSE. Corn ee Memb " Gray. ABSTAIN: None.
B. Site Deve r 2 ,.�'I-922 has been submitted by Robert
` for ' Aga iaW / Torre Nissan of La Quinta for
consi n o%` hitectural, Site, and Landscaping Plans for Torre
Nissan mote �T,ealership, including a separate temporary
torage srtocatat the southeast corner of Highway 111 and
. o Centel(�, ay North /southeast corner of Adams Street and
A ,centerAbrive.
Assist Planner Eric Ceja presented the information contained in
the s ` ff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning
Department.
Committee Member McCune said the use of Tipu tree in the
proposed staggered landscaping in 24" and 36" boxes would
enhance the area. He asked what the temporary parking lot would
be used for.
P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_4-4-12\ALRC Min_1-4-12 Draft.doc 4
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
Mr. Michael Reinhardt, Executive Manager with Torre Nissan, 79-
125 Highway 111, La Quinta, CA, introduced himself and explained
that the parking lot would be used for storing vehicles while being
prepared for display, no sales transactions would occur there, and
the vehicles would be parked in a receptive manner.
Mr. Brent Tally, 79-125 Highway 111, La Quinta, CA, introduced
himself and further explained the dealership operations for the
temporary parking lot. ,r ,
Planning Director Johnson indicatedie % on the plans the
temporary parking lot would be loca l a►*:.,emphasized that the
site was proposed strictly as a to orgy use bring the dealership
expansion project. He explaine�`t did not t the standards
for a permanent lot, what it ` Id be used for, an ",., ow long.
Discussion followed regarding
landscaping, retention basin, f
Committee Member #
construction was expec d f
approximatel" year, an th
for a sh'" d after t
deter a su '` t date to
of itn7°' t m t to run in
ing, PM1'10 treatment,
, etc.
a4kedtaar-��'long the expansion
f" eplied that it would last
reprkinglot would be used
t was staff's objective to
use of the temporary lot, as the use
said he was pleased that the
expansion.
Committ 1llam oker said he liked the contemporary design
f the bwl , bu a expressed a concern with the proposed color
ette. He4id the proposed brassy gray might not blend in very
ith t adjacent buildings which were painted in desert -like,
soft `'., w. ones. He suggested the applicant communicate with
the m m .... acturer of the building to inquire about toning down the
brass gray color to a softer, desert -like gray. In addition, he
recommended the use of landscaping to further minimize the impact
of the building.
Committee Member Rooker suggested increasing the number of
palm trees along Auto Center Parkway from two to four.
P:Uteports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_4-4-12\ALRC Min_1-4-12 Draft.doc 5.
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
Mr. Robert Ricciardi, Architect, 75-860 Sarazen Way, Palm Desert,
CA, introduced himself and explained the that the two palm trees
identified on the plans were existing.
Further discussion followed regarding possible landscaping
opportunities on the different site elevations.
Committee Member McCune said it was his impression that the
landscaping for all of the dealerships in the 4 Quinta Auto Center
had been neglected a bit over the lastrs. He noted he
would like to see the dealerships pay attention to the upkeep
and maintenance of the landscaping. ._rTX
Mr. Reinhardt said he was alskfie"''President the Auto Center
Association and in such cape he was in charge `e#, , berlandscape
contractor. He said the is'es �t mentioned had baddressed
and the landscape contractor wa prbcess of re doing the sod
and improving the edging.
Committee Member M id he wad posed to hear that there
was an association b we �!n of tW dealerships that could
address the landscaping i u ` 4
Planni `Direc , Johnson id the City had been working with a
land caonsnt and an renter
itect on some conceptual plans for
improvers Autofrontage along Highway 111.
lame the i` " ments consisted of a package that
addre Sig`3 vehicle display pads, and landscaping, that
would p e c ity along all of the dealerships. However,
what wou m`_' omeut of it at this time was uncertain, due to the
$Upr C t ruling regarding Redevelopment Agencies, as these
i ye t"' would have been funded through, the City's
Re nt Agency.
Generdi" discussion followed regarding the existing landscaping and
the direction the conceptual plans would take.
There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Committee Members McCune/Rooker to adopt Minute Motion
2012-002, recommending approval of Site Development Permit
2011-922, as submitted with the following recommendations:
PAReports - ALRC\2012�ALRC_44-12\ALRC Min_1-4-12 Draft.doc 6
Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee
Minutes
January 4, 2012
• The applicant shall plant an additional two (2) palm trees, to
match existing, along Auto Centre Way North.
• The applicant shall provide additional landscape along the
north -side of the wall that encloses the vehicle repair yard.
The landscape shall include shrubs and trees to screen the
building.
• All pole lighting shall remain as is
lighting pole height or color shall be,
AYES: Committee Members McCu
ABSENT: Committee Member Gray;;
VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WR
VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS:
VIII. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS:
Planning Director
ruling regarding F
City of La Quints
IX. ADJOURN
no
Architectural and
be?held on Febru
on January 4, 20
Respectfully
MONIKA RADEVA
Secretary
improvements to
NOES: None.
None
Johnson gave a bnefi overview "of the Supreme Court's
-develop ment Agencies amd i.the effects that had on the
rid its redeveloprrment projects.
^f,urther busmnos's, it was moved and seconded by
mers 'Rooker/McCune to adjourn this meeting of the
Landscaping Review Committee to a Regular Meeting to
ry, 1, 20,i°'2. This meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m.
P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_4-4-12\ALRC Min_1-4-12 Draft.doc 7
BI # A
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE: APRIL 4, 2012
CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-863,
AMENDMENT #1
APPLICANT: AV CONSTRUCTION, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER: AV CONSTRUCTION, LLC
ARCHITECT: POON DESIGN, INC
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: HSA DESIGN GROUP.
ENGINEER: MDS CONSULTING
REQUEST:, CONSIDERATION OF ARCHITECTURAL AND UNIT
LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR ALTA VERDE CORAL
MOUNTAIN (FORMERLY PASATIEMPO); TR 34243
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE AVENUE 58, '/4 MILE WEST OF MADISON
STREET
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
ZONING
DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
SURROUNDING
ZONING/LAND USES:
NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL;
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(PGA WEST; PUERTA AZUL)
SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; GOLF
COURSE (ANDALUSIA)
EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LION'S GATE
SUBDIVISION)
WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(SANTA ROSA TRAILS SUBDIVISION)
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The purpose of a Site Development Permit is to provide specific design review of a
project's proposed architecture and landscaping. The Architectural and Landscaping
Review Committee's (ALRC) role in reviewing this type of application is to provide
the Planning Commission with a recommendation regarding the design of the
proposed project and its compliance with the City's various development
regulations.
When reviewing applications, the ALRC is typically responsible for reviewing site
design, architectural design, and landscape design. Site related items include
exterior lighting fixtures, project entries, streetscape, water features, pedestrian
circulation, and similar amenities. Architectural items for review include building
mass, scale, architectural style, and aesthetic details, including materials, roof
style, and colors. Landscape review includes plant types, plant location and size,
landscape screening of equipment and undesirable views, and the emphasis of
prominent design features. This coordinated review is necessary to promote a
unifying project design, compatibility with other surrounding uses, and aesthetic
consistency with existing architecture and the -level of quality prevalent in the
community. Once reviewed, the ALRC's recommendation will be included in the
staff report presented to the Planning Commission.
In this instance, the project site infrastructure, including streets, common area and
perimeter parkway landscape improvements have all been completed, along with
three existing model units built under the previous architectural approval. Only the
project architecture and individual unit landscaping are being revised by the new
owner. To assist the ALRC in this review, the following background and analysis is
provided.
BACKGROUND
The Pasatiempo project was originally approved as a 70-lot subdivision on
approximately 20 acres, under Tract 34243, by the La Quinta City Council on May
16, 2006. It is located on the north side of Avenue 58, approximately '/4 mile west
of Madison Street (Attachment 1). Shortly thereafter, the project proponent,
Innovative Communities, filed a Site Development Permit (SDP 2006-863) for
consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for three prototypical
residential unit plans for use in Tract 34243. The application was approved by the
Planning Commission on July 25, 2006. Innovative completed the subdivision
improvements and three model units under this approval prior to the housing
2
market crash. AV Construction acquired the site in 2011 and proposes a new
product type for the remaining 67 lots; the existing 3 models will remain and be
marketed with the new product line. Attachment 2 includes several photos of the
site in its current condition, as well as photos of the completed units.
PROPOSAL
Project Overview:
The applicant is requesting consideration of new architectural and individual unit
landscaping plans to complete the 67 remaining lots within TR 34243 (Attachment
3). The site is bounded on the north by portions of the PGA West and Puerta Azul
developments. To the south, across Avenue 58, lies the undeveloped portion of the
Andalusia project; the Lion's Gate custom lots are to the east and to the west is the
Santa Rosa Trails development.
The project proposes four single-family detached unit floor plans:
• Product 'C-3' (Attachment 3; Sheet 02) - Located on 18 lots, this has 2,829
s.f. of living area, with 3 BR and 3 BA, and a two -car garage.
• Product 'J-3' (Attachment 3; Sheet 07)- Located on 13 lots, this has 2,659
s.f. of living area, with 3 BR and 2 BA, and a two -car garage that includes a
tandem space sized for a golf cart or third vehicle. Lots with J-3 units can
also accommodate a 179 s.f. accessory pool structure, which includes a
bathroom and shower.
• Product 'D-3' (Attachment 3; Sheet 12) - Located on 18 lots, this has 2,786
s.f. of living area, with 3 BR and 3 BA, and a two -car garage.
• Product 'Z-3' (Attachment 3; Sheet 17) - Located on 18 lots, this has 2,619
s.f. of living area, with 3 BR and 2 BA, and a two -car garage. Lots with Z-3
units can also accommodate a 162 s.f. accessory pool pavilion, similar to a
detached patio cover.
These units are all single story and do not exceed 20' 2" (J-3 unit); the Z-3 plan is
only 11' 10" in height. While the siting plan (Attachment 3; Sheet 01) shows
swimming pools and pool accessory structures on most lots, pools are intended to
be constructed with all units as a standard feature.
There are three existing model units that were constructed in 2007, as part of the
original Pasatiempo approvals. The applicant intends to incorporate these units into
the overall lot program for the new units, by refurbishing the front elevations'
architectural detailing, materials, colors and changing the existing landscaping to be
3
more in line with the proposed units. The new units will be sold out of a relocated
model complex, north of the existing homes (Attachment 3; Sheet 01).
Landscaping:
The project infrastructure, common area landscaping and other permanent
improvements have all been completed and accepted by the City; the applicant only
proposes landscaping plan typicals for the individual unit front yards (Attachment 3;
Sheet 26). These individual yard plans incorporate a mix of Washingtonia Hybrid and
Sago palms, Desert Willow, Chilean Mesquite and Museum Palo Verde as their
major elements. Various succulents, cacti and ornamental grasses make up the
remainder of the palette. Desert Gold decomposed granite is the primary inert cover,
with both smooth and crushed cobble accents. Most plants used in the palette are
low-water use species, and there are no turfed areas provided.
Site Design:
The project site layout is already established and fully improved. It is laid out in an
elongated grid, with perimeter lots backing up along all four sides of the project. A
common lot runs north -south through the center of the project, providing a
greenbelt/trail area for residents. Lots backing up to this common area are elevated
above it and include a wrought iron fence with decorative pilasters as separation
along the rear property lines. Valle Verde, a short street segment that connects to
the internal loop street layout, provides access into the tract from Avenue 58.
The applicant proposes no new landscape or other lighting, as these improvements
already exists for the common areas throughout the project site. The only lighting
proposed will be the wall sconce fixtures and recessed CFL downlights that are
part of the individual units (Attachment 3, Sheet 25).
Architectural Design:
The proposed architectural plans reflect a Modernist theme (Attachment 3; Sheets
02 - 25). They appear stark and bland as viewed from the elevations; the renderings
provide a better feel for the architectural concept.
The C-3 unit (Attachment 3; Sheets 02 - 06) incorporates flat roof line parapets
with a central elevated clerestory. This is a one-story unit at a height of 17' 0" to
the clerestory, and 11' 6" to the main building and garage rooflines.
The J-3 unit (Attachment 3; Sheets 07 - 1 1) incorporates a hipped Mission tile roof
with a 4.5 to 1 pitch over the living and dining areas of the unit, and flat roof lines
over the garage and sleeping rooms. This is a one-story unit at a height of 20' 2" to
the hipped roofline and 13' 0" to the flat roof parapet.
a
The D-3 unit (Attachment 3; Sheets 12 - 16) also incorporates a hipped Mission the
roof with a 4.5 to 1 pitch over the garage, and living and dining areas of the unit,
and a flat roof line over the sleeping rooms. This is a one-story unit at a height of
18' 8" to the hipped roofline and 12' 0" to the flat roof parapet. This unit most
closely resembles the existing units in mass, scale and design.
The Z-3 unit (Attachment 3; Sheets 17 - 22) utilizes a flat roof line over the entire
structure. This is a one-story unit at a height of .18' 8" to the hipped roofline and
12' 0" to the flat roof parapet.
Materials to be used (Attachment 3; Sheet 25) include stone veneer, fiberglass
wood windows and entry doors, painted metal fascia and screens, and exterior
walls in cement plaster in a medium sand texture finish. The material/color palette
provides for 6 options; the builder would like to give their buyers a variety of color
options with six different package options. The stone veneer will only be used on
the C-3 and Z-3 units. Individual site walls will be precision block finish for
demising walls, and split -face block for all front site walls except for the D-3 unit,
which will share the unit's color and sand finish.
ANALYSIS
Site Design:
The units, pools and accessory buildings, as shown on the floor plans, comply with
the zoning restrictions for the RL district and Supplemental Residential Regulations
governing pools and accessory buildings.
No analysis of site design is necessary as the project layout is built out. All street,
landscape and other improvements associated with TR 34243 have been accepted
by the City's Planning and Public Works Departments.
The only proposed exterior lighting is related to the individual units and consists of
exterior wall sconces and recessed CFL downlights to be used on the units. This
low-level lighting will confine direct light within the individual lot boundaries. From
a design perspective, staff is recommending that at least one additional exterior
wall sconce model be incorporated.
Architectural Design:
With regards to the architectural style, the Modernist vernacular of the proposed
units initially caused some concern to staff, given the Mediterranean/Spanish-based
architectural styles in the surrounding area. This style is a more simplistic,
minimalist architecture, with little or no embellishments (pop -outs, niches, cornices,
5
etc.) commonly seen in other architectural proposals. The proposed architecture
will stand apart from the surrounding built environment. However, the height,
mass, and scale of the units, the tallest being at about 20 feet high, will
significantly minimize perceived incompatibilities with surrounding styles.
The biggest concern of staff is with compatibility in regard to the three existing
units and their overall streetscape appearance (Attachment 3; Sheet 23), which
were more typical of Spanish or Mediterranean styles of architecture. Based on
discussions with the applicant, staff had requested this streetscape exhibit, which
includes the new units with the existing homes to show how these elevations
would appear in relation to one another. This sheet shows that the existing units
will receive new plaster sand finish and color, lighting sconces, garage and entry
doors consistent with the new units. They will also have certain decorative features
removed (i.e. clay piping and iron work insets, clay wall -coping tiles), toward
consistency with the more minimalist appearance of the new units. Staff had made
additional suggestions which included removal of the decorative edging along the
garage header for the Lot 40 unit, and changing the arched door and windows to
rectangular, consistent with the new units. It was also suggested that some of the
stone veneer be worked into at least one of the existing homes to help further tie
these units in with the new product. As reflected on this sheet, the applicant has
addressed only the Lot 40 garage header, citing cost as the main factor. Staff is
recommending that the following changes be included in the ALRC's action:
A. The arched doors, windows and openings for the existing Lot,40 unit shall be
changed, consistent with those of the new unit types.
B. A stone veneer treatment shall be employed on at least one of the existing
units, as appropriate for the elevation.
C. Chimney boxes for the existing units shall be changed out, consistent with
those of the new unit types.
Regarding colors/materials (Attachment 3; Sheet 25), while the package infers 6
options, there are limitations in color and material choices within those options. For
example, while there are 6 different (if not distinct) plaster colors, there is only one
accent paint color. The lighting fixtures are the same for each option. The
windows, entry and garage doors are all the same specification and pattern, with
only two color variations. The tile roof material is one specification and provides
three tile color patterns. The stone veneer provides the most variation (three stone
cuts in three colors), but will only be used on just over half of the units. Staff is
recommending that the applicant provide more color choices/variations for review
by the Planning Director.
The project proposes two types of accessory yard structures as options to
homeowners (Attachment 3; Sheet 22). Accessory Structure A is an enclosed
building with a bathroom facility, while Accessory Structure B is similar to a small
9
detached patio, cover, intended more as a shade element. While Structure A is
intended as an accessory pool use, it is designed in a manner that could
accommodate its use as living space. Staff will address this as part of the Planning
Commission staff report.
Landscaping:
In general, the proposed landscape palette for the individual units is consistent with
the existing landscape design throughout the project. While the assorted species of
plants do not exactly match the previously approved palette for the unit landscapes,
they are consistent in type and quantities,. and provide a diversity which
distinguishes the new units within the tract's setting. They also reflect the City's
requirements and policies toward lower water -use landscapes, which are more
restrictive now than when the landscape plans for the original units were approved
in 2006. The use of the new unit landscape plans to replace the existing unit
landscaping will also help to further integrate the existing units into the new project
design. The use of Palo Verdes, Desert Willow and Washingtonia Palms, along with
cacti and succulent accents, properly reflects a Desert Southwestern environment in
context with the proposed architectural style.
Based on this analysis, the proposed project and existing conditions, staff has
developed a recommendation for ALRC consideration. The recommended conditions
relate only to direct responsibilities of the ALRC; several additional conditions
unrelated to ALRC review, such as model complex requirements, accessory
structure limitations, and general permitting items, will be added as part of the
Planning Commission report and review.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee recommend approval of
Site Development Permit 2006-853, Amendment #1, to the Planning Commission,
subject to inclusion of the following Conditions of Approval:
1. The applicant shall submit an expanded materials board, outlining additional
color and material variations for the following: Accent Paint, Garage Doors,
Fiberglass Windows and Entry Doors. At least one additional Exterior Wall
Sconce model shall be incorporated.
2. The herein listed revisions shall be incorporated with the proposed
modification of the existing units. These modifications shall be included with
the building plans prepared for final building permit review, and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of the
first building permit.
FA
A. The arched doors, windows and openings for the existing Lot 40 unit
shall be changed, consistent with those of the new unit types.
B. A stone veneer treatment shall be employed on at least one of the
existing units, as appropriate for the elevation.
C. Chimney boxes for the existing units shall be changed out, consistent
with those of the new unit types.
3. The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for review, processing and
approval to the Planning Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape
Plan application process. Final landscape plans shall include any proposed
and/or required landscape lighting plans/specifications. Exterior lighting shall
be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). Planning
Director approval of final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the
first building permit unless the Planning Director determines extenuating
circumstances exist which justify an alternative processing schedule.
NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the
appropriate City official, including the Planning Director and/or City Engineer.
Prepared by:
Wallace Nesbit, Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Site Aerial; TR 34243
2. Site photos
3. SDP Exhibit package dated 2/13/12, with revised sheets 23 and 24
E
ATTACHMENT 1
SITE AERIAL 4 0 230ft
ALTA VERDE - TR 34243 N CRYGIS
Copyright ® 2006 All Roft Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the
contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products.
i �wfia'
•� s,
�. � f.!
Entry gate
Looking norm
ALTA VERDE CORAL MOUNTAIN
A\/ CONSTRUCTION, LLC tAGUNtn.cn
SMEM6ER 2011
11
View of lom looking north
EAging residence- will be re -painted and re4andscaped to match new schemes
ALTA VERDE CORAL MOUNTAIN
AV CONSTRUCTION, LLC hAo>R9&CA
2oli
12
Usting residence- will be re -painted and reaandscaped to match new schemes
F)dsong residence- will be re -painted and re -landscaped to match new schemes
ALTA VERDE CORAL MOUNTAIN
AV CONSTRUCTION, LLC wGLROA ca
2011SEPTEWW
13
is
m
F
p! pppp p t p j�
............ .......... .....
r
vs 3nn3m
� sM
g • 31
@@ 3a
N.
c
c
p
mN
a
Eo
n
mo
00
!2
DO'
a!
z
0
z
jo
0�
>
u
<
i
<i
S
J
0_
0 "O
n
<
U
.16
0
f
— ' — — — — — — — — — — — --- - -
ul
0
0
N
0
i•J
0
0
N
0
50
I
•so
4}
El $j?
1 ai Jill
0
w
E�
O
r�
r—
r—
Pr
a
Ci
N
CD
i
J
0
D
EN
F
s
m'
a^
m N
� o
ono
o Z
m E
s °1N"
0
mm
WON
Ny'
N
LO
E�
m
m
c
m N
O
Eo
2
m
2 m
p
—
m
o
vE
m
"° o
m�
W
w0�
= m
ina
O
p
N
C
:7
� O O
I
u,
.... _fit.
,s
!
1
!
r
Or
�; bs
ICCV
�x
j'.
V
r—
E�
m
dw
°Eo
m N
o
a
a_
>
W
m r
m E
m
m
W x n o
= m
W WNn
NOL
0_
b
N
•
L2
N
a
��I M
�M
E�
i
N
O O
Sa,
;;g
a
log
LL
a
8A
su�<
m �
W
oil
O O
2.1;
tog
W
_
s6�
N
0
a
m
Q Zz
O
W 60
M
< �<
r 0 0
�
< oS
N
04
r
F
W�
p
@_pH
53 3
§iYe$
FHHH�
d�
ad
PH
u
w
<<
O
z�
C
F
i
~
K
W
J
QO
W
Q
V n
JJ
6
;4
70 SERIES WALL
701304Q-EL-DB-WA=071564
SPECIFICATION FEATURES p2 p7 12 PROJECT: Coral Mountain in La QUinta
Dimensions
15" H X 6" W X 4" D
Lamps
2-Quad 13 / 4Pin
Material
Paintlok
Finish
POWdercoat Bronze
Lens
White Alabaster
Label
Wet Location
Weight
7lbs
Voltage
120
Description
70 Series Flush Mount Wall
SPECIFIER:= , CLS
EVERGREEN LIGHTING oWWW.EVERGREENLIGHTING.COM
1379 Ridgeway St. • Pomona, CA 91768 *PHONE: (909) 865-5599 *FAX: (909) 865-5539
MADE IN USA o Information appearing hereon is proprietary and confidential and may not
be used without the permission of Evergreen Lighting.
Lmon® '
[TypeL I G H T I N G ctLH99PICA - IC AIRTIGHT HOUSING 09 #
4" COMPACT FLUORESCENT HOUSINGS
FFATURE(S):
®.
r- 9 7/8" -7
7 3/8" 7 7/8" (.
c �
_1-4114" !— 121/4"
This Housing is now available as ENERGY STAR, please consult In n for up to date
Energy Star ordering. 277V Not available for 13W magnetic. Outer Box is not required for
13W & I BW
SPECIFWATION Ceiling cut-out: 4 112'
CFL 13W DTT
18W/26W TTT
Application: General purpose recessed downlight housing for low to medium height ceilings
for residential and light commercial applications, A variety of trims, compatible styles and
finishes are available to achieve the proper d6cor and illumination.
Housing: Pre -wired housing adjusts up to a I 1/2"ceiling thickness, Integral thermal
protector to gguard aggainst improper lumping and installation. Trim is secured with torsion
wing springs/stoncluA coil springs.
Mounting: Housing suitable for new construction installations only, supplied with (21 24"
adjustable hanger bars with 90 degrees repositioning ability. Hanger bars equippedd with
nail -less install 3/4" serrated barbedstuds and with captive nails, for faster and easier
secure mounting in wood joists. Set -screws lock into position and prevent shilling after
installation. Earthquake structural cable compatible for drop panel ceiling or any other
mounting that requires direct support from structural ceilings.
Ballast: Electronic Class P 60Hz Ballast with Inherent thermal protection. For Double Twin
Tube (DTI) or Triple Twin Tube Lamps (!TT). Sound A rated. Micro -Processor controlled.
Min. sterling temperature -10°C. Accessible from above or below the ceiling. Contact -
factory for detailed technical information on ballast specifications. Note: For dimming
applications must use compatible dimmer switch. Consult specific ballast manufacturer for
up-to-date compatibility list.
Socket. Thermo -plastic socket UL Listed rated for high temperature and provides nickel
plated contacts. Either accepts 2-Pin lamps for use with magnetic ballast or 4-Pin lamps
with electronic ballast selection.
Junction Box:16 ggauge prb-wired galvanized steel Junction Box, 32 cubic -inch for a
maximum of IS) #12 AWG wires. Furnished with (7) 3/4" and (4) Romex knock -outs. Strain
clomps ro install or remove covers for easy access and ground wire. Equipped with safety
standard fining for flex -conduit.
u
0
Insulation Contact: IC noted housing rated for direct contact with law to medium density'
loosefill blown and rolled insulation.
'n Safety labels: ETL/CETL listed for through -branch wiring (8) No.12 AWG 90'C and suitable
for damp locations. NYC approved: Calendar #41937.
Emergency Option: Emergency back-up operates one lamp for a minimum of 90 minutes at Emergency Option: Emergency bock -up operates one lamp for a
750 Lumens in case of ower outage. Unit is remotely mounted. h includes battery, minimum o190 minutes at 750 t caeca in core of power outage. Unit is
p remotely mounted. It induces battery, diarger, and lest switch with
charger, and test switch with indicator light. Consult Factory{or 1300 Lumen Package. indicator light. Consult Factory for 13DO Lumen Package.
Label: E.T.L. Listed Cabal: E.T,L. Usted
ORDERING
ORDERING EXAMPLE : LH99PICA-26E-27
..
s• o
LH99PICA 'Blank :13W Magnetic (No Box)
Blank:None
E :13W IC Airtight (No Box)
-27 :120V/277V
-26-120D:26W 120V Dimming'
-EM :Emergency
-26E :26W
-1326UE :13W/18W/26W 120V/277V IC Airtight
-ISE :18W Magnetic (No Box)
' 120D option dimmable with most incandescent or Powerlins dimmers.
Tel: 323.904.0200 Product specifications subject to
change without notol). www.l°on.cont �:��!!�
` LNIC.One
I L 1 6 N T I N G
UM - ALBAM TRIM
L. 4" LINE VOLTAGE TRIMS
11
�- 3 5/811--
SPECIFICATION
120V SOW Max R20/PAR20 MED E26
Application: A perfect choice to illuminate a shower of bath. With its small aperture and
incandescent light source, these trims produce a strong vibrant light that fully illuminates the
shower and bath areas without drawing attention to the source.
Gasket Supplied with gasket to prevent light leakage and unsightly heat streaks on ceiling
surface.
Mounting Steel pressure springs mounted on trim to ensure positive retention inside
housing.
Ring Finish: Die -Formed Aluminum Trim Ring Available in White, White (Plastic), Black,
Chrome, Gold, Natural, Copper and Mocha.
Label: U.L. Listed, E.T.L. Listed
ORDERING
II��F��®
LR922 PW
:White (Plastic) Blan
W
:White -WL
B
:Black
C
:Chrome
G
:Gold
N
:Natural
CO
:Copper
MO
:Mocha
FEATURE(S): ® yl
Note: WoHcye limilalions on 00mpo6ble hems mesa be met.
ORDERING EXAMPLE : LR922B-WL
Tel: 323.904.0200 Product spectOcatltms subject to change without notice.
� � I �O ��o SIY]WAI.QUYAJXOW
[eRbYJ Y.WVfeOYI 1 4�g
e:
N
_ ➢ ! itt �$yy 2
i hYi ! tillii
ttH ii # t @ ii�t iEi IlltFf G�If 1 +�lll13� �t'd
< Lli 1; tt i si ��l►tl �tH ;t�t�ilf 3.�i1 }i - �`
OO(D�0 E 0 1' iJda
----------------
1,9
-- 1
Xr
�-
YU
-- — — — �EO ® 17
" O O
S.5[egq i e e . e . . . . s
db gm
ti w v— ,It�fl�lfi �ile! e= e i yl Ie �t it a ee ]i i
�1.klE 1:t