Loading...
PC Resolution 2012-012PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2012-124, APPROVING A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR MULTIPLE PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE CASE NO.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2012-124 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 22nd of May, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing for review of a City -initiated request to consider a General Plan Amendment for a change in land use for multiple parcels from Village Commercial to Major. Community Facilities, located within the La Quinta Village, more particularly - described as: APN: 773101003, 773078008, 773101002, 773078009,773078023,773101001 WHEREAS, said General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Planning Department has reviewed the Amendment and Zone Change under the provisions of CEQA, and has determined that the Amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 11`h, 2012, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Amendment: Finding A The project is consistent with the General Plan The proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the general plan which are not being amended. The Planning Commission Resolution 2012-012 General Plan Amendment 2012-124 May 22, 2012 purpose of the change in land use designations is to bring the appropriate land use designations into conformance with the existing public facilities. Finding B Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed change will not result in a substantial change to existing recreational area, will not result in the loss of existing wildlife habitat, nor will it have an effect on the conditions of the existing surrounding neighborhood due to the fact that all of the subject properties have already been developed as community facilities. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not result in any changed conditions and will therefore have no effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community or surrounding natural environment. Finding C The new designation is compatible with the land use designations on adjacent properties. The General Plan Amendment will bring the properties into conformance with the General Plan and will have no effect on adjacent existing land uses because the properties have already been fully developed as community facilities. Finding D The new land use designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. The new land use designations are suitable and appropriate for the subject properties, as they are all public facilities utilized for education, public services, and public safety. The properties have been previously developed as community facilities such as a museum and public parking facilities. Finding E Approval of the amendment is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing designation was imposed. Approval of the new land use designation is warranted because the existing land uses are better suited to a change in designation to Major Community Facilities over their current designations. Planning Commission Resolution 2012-012 General Plan Amendment 2012-124 May 22, 2012 Finding F The project is in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City has determined that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the public facilities are already constructed and the change in land use designation is consistent and appropriate for the public facilities. No physical change to the environment will occur as a result of the General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment 2012-124 to the City Council for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on the 22ntl day of May, 2012, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Barrows, Wilkinson, Wright, and Chairman Alderson NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Weber ABSTAIN: None ED ALDERSON, Chairman City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: / I :I01-119SON, Planning Director of La Quinta, California