Loading...
2012 10 16 CCCity Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www.la-quinta.org CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, California Regular Meeting TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2012 4:00 P.M. Open Session Beginning Resolution No. 2012-055 Ordinance No. 503 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Council Members: Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Osborne and Mayor Adolph PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CLOSED SESSION — NONE PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATIONS — NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — NONE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 OCTOBER 16, 2012 ie APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2012 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVAL OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH DESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES 2. APPROVAL OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION .OF ORDINANCE NO. 501 AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 3.24 "TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX;" AND ADDING CHAPTER 3.25 "SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS" TO TITLE 3 "REVENUE AND FINANCE" OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE 3. APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE FRED WARING DRIVE MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 201 1-04 4. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 33076-21 MADISON CLUB, EAST OF MADISON, LLC 5. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP NO 34968, MADISON CLUB VILLAS, EAST OF MADISON, LLC 6. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP NO. 34969, MADISON CLUB CLUBHOUSE, EAST OF MADISON, LLC 7. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED OCTOBER 16, 2012 J 8. APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING COMMISSION TO UTILIZE THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS FEBRUARY 27, JUNE 26 AND OCTOBER 23, 2013, 8:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M. 9. RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2012 10. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2012 AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012. 10 002 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 OCTOBER 16, 2012 11. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF LA QUINTA AND INDIO FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE COACHELLA CANAL AT MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 50, PROJECT NO. 2009-02 12. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TY LIN INTERNATIONAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADAMS STREET BRIDGE, PROJECT NO. 2006-06 BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS VETERANS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AREA APPLICATIONS STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT 2. DISCUSSION OF SILVERROCK RESORT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS AND CANAL UPDATE REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (FRANKLIN) 2. CITY COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORTS 3. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS 4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFO EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (OSBORNE) 5. C.V. CONSERVATION COMMISSION (EVANS) 6. C.V. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (ROBERT COX) 7. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (FRANKLIN) 8. C.V.W.D. JOINT WATER POLICY COMMITTEE (ADOLPH) 9. IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE (OSBORNE) 10. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (FRANKLIN) 11. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (HENDERSON) 12. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (EVANS) 13. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (ROBERT TEAL) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DIANE GUNN) 15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (HENDERSON) 16. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY/SUNLINE SERVICES GROUP (ADOLPH) 17. ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES APRIL 4, 2012 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 OCTOBER 16, 2012 003 18. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER A. RESPONSE(S) TO PUBLIC COMMENT B. UPDATE - SERVICE DELIVERY OPTION REVIEW C. OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING UPDATE REPORT 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK A. UPCOMING EVENTS AND CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR B. ANNUAL DINNER FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT VOLUNTEERS 4. BUILDING 8i SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 5. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 AND COMMUNITY SERVICES MARKETING PLAN 6. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS 7. PLANNING DEPARTMENT A. REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 B. STATUS REPORT - PERMITTING PROCESS 8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 9. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT ENDING SEPTEMBER 2012 MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS - NONE RECESS TO THE MEETING OF THE CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE DISSOLVED LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FOLLOWED BY THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE LA QUINTA HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETINGS RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it, is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). PRESENTATIONS - NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "request to speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 OCTOBER 16, 2012•' -' 004 A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to the public hearing. 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 9.5 ACRES WITHIN THE CENTRE POINTE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, GENERAL AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS, A ZONE CHANGE, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AND A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on November 6, 2012 commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Susan Maysels, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin boards at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas and 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, on October 12, 2012. DATED: October 11, 2012 sv - A114- SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California ,t 1 005 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 OCTOBER 16, 2012 Public Notices • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7103, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangement should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 777-7103. A one (1) week notice is required. • If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. • Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 OCTOBER 16, 2012 1 006 ra-1-Y)SA/HA/FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with Desert Classic Charities RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: I STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with Desert Classic Charities for an amount not to exceed $39,000 for the 2013 Humana Challenge Community Events, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City, Desert Classic Charities (DCC), and Humana are partnering to provide healthy, family oriented events the weekend prior to the Humana Challenge Tournament. To be held on January 12 and 13, 2013, these events include the Humana Well -Being Walk, Humana Healthy Fun Fair, and Humana Day. Under the agreement the City will plan, coordinate, and execute the production of the events on behalf of its partners. DCC will reimburse the City for the promotion and production of the events for an amount not to exceed $39,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will incur upfront costs not to exceed $39,000 to stage these events. DCC will reimburse the City for these expenses within thirty days. Per the agreement the City is not obligated for any expenses to produce these events. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In October 2011, representatives from DCC, Humana and the City discussed the golf tournament and the possibility of creating ancillary community events. The events would emphasize health and well-being, and would offer health education opportunities and activity components through community collaboration and planning. 007 The following events were created: • Humana Well -Being Walk - 500 Participants (2012) A five mile roundtrip walk that started at La Quinta Community Park, followed the Bear Creek Trail to the top of the Cove and then returned to the Park. • Humana Healthy Fun Fair - 2,000 Participants (2012) A community event with health -based vendors, live music, active program demonstrations, a kid's fun zone, games and activities, and a rock wall. • Humana Day at the Certified Farmers Market - 1,000 Participants (2012) Humana sponsored the Certified Farmers Market for one day and hosted cooking demonstrations by local chefs, and a "Chopped" style challenge involving the La Quinta High School Culinary Arts program students. These events were managed by the City and supported by other local service providers including Desert Recreation District and Family YMCA of the Desert. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the Desert Classic Charities to provide community events for the Humana Challenge Tournament. Respectfully submitted, r=: -, � Edie Hylton Community Services Director Attachment: 1. HUMANA Events MOU 2013 " 008 ATTACHMENT 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND DESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is made by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a municipal corporation and charter city ("CITY"), and Desert Classic Charities MCC"), a 501.C3 Non -Profit Organization, with respect to the following: RECITALS WHEREAS, it is the mission of both the CITY and DCC to provide recreation, health and fitness opportunities for residents in the community; WHEREAS, the parties wish to assume certain responsibilities in connection with two (2) promotional opportunities as follows: Wellness Walk and Healthy Fun Fair on Saturday, January 12, 2013, and La Quinta Certified Farmers Market on Sunday, January 13, 2013 hereinafter referred to as ("EVENTS"), and more particularly described on Exhibit A. WHEREAS, this document assigns responsibilities for certain tasks to be performed by CITY and DCC; and WHEREAS, CITY and DCC desire to work cooperatively utilizing all available existing Desert Recreation District and CITY assets to maximize the recreation, health and fitness opportunities for residents in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and DCC agree to the following: 1.0 TERM OF MEMORANDUM. 1.1 All Recitals set out above are true and correct. 1.2 This MOU is to remain in effect for 1 (one) year following its execution by the parties to this MOU. This MOU may be terminated at any time by any of the parties to the MOU with a 30 (thirty) day notice to the remaining parties. Should one party elect to terminate participation under this MOU, the remaining parties may continue the meetings and collaboration contemplated in this MOU. This MOU will automatically terminate should a simple majority of parties to the MOU terminate participation with appropriate notice as defined above. 2.0 OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The CITY will provide the services listed on Exhibit B attached and incorporated ("CITY obligations"). 3.0 OBLIGATIONS OF DCC. DCC will provide the services listed on Exhibit C attached and incorporated ("DCC obligations"). 4.0 MUTUAL INDEMNITY AND RELEASE. The City and DCC each hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party and its officers, employees, agents, Page 1 019 009 and authorized volunteers (collectively, "Indemnitees") from and against any and all claims, causes of action, obligations, losses, liabilities, judgments, or damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of litigation (collectively "Claims") arising out of and/or in any way relating to the indemnifying party's activities in the performance of this Memorandum, or to the indemnifying party's acts and/or omissions in providing or administering the same, excepting only those Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. This Agreement is not intended to and specifically does not create joint and several liability. 5.0 INSURANCE. The Parties agree to provide insurance in accordance with the provisions of this Section. 5.1 CITY'S Insurance Obligation. Without limiting the indemnification provisions provided herein, CITY, at its sole expense, shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this MOU and any extensions thereof, a policy or policies of general liability insurance covering all injuries to persons and damage to property occurring in, upon or about the Premises resulting from any actions or omissions of the CITY or any use of the Premises by the City or its invitees in accordance with the terms of this MOU. The policy or policies evidencing such insurance shall be endorsed to name DCC its officials, officers, employees, and agents as additional insured, shall provide that same may not be cancelled or amended without thirty (30) days prior notice to DCC, and shall provide for a combined single limit coverage of bodily injury and property damage in the amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Such policy or policies shall be issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of California and be rated A-/VIII or better by ambest.com. Prior to the Commencement Date of this MOU, and upon renewal of such policies, the CITY shall submit to DCC certificates of insurance and any applicable endorsements evidencing that the foregoing policy or policies are in effect. At the CITY's option, CITY shall be allowed to self -insure the insurance coverage as required above. 5.2 DCC's Insurance Obligation. Without limiting the indemnification provisions provided herein, DCC, at its sole expense, shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this MOU and any extensions thereof, a policy or policies of general liability insurance covering all injuries to persons and damage to property occurring in, upon or about the Premises resulting from any actions or omissions of DCC or any use of the Premises by DCC or its invitees in accordance with the terms of this MOU. The policy or policies evidencing such insurance shall be endorsed to name the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, and agents as additional insured, shall provide that same may not be cancelled or amended without thirty (30) days prior notice to CITY, and shall provide for a combined single limit coverage of bodily injury and property damage in the amount of not less than One Million Dollars 01,000,000)• Such policy or policies shall be issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of California and be rated A-/VIII or better by ambest.com. Prior to the Commencement Date of this MOU, and upon renewal of such policies, DCC shall submit to CITY certificates of insurance and any applicable endorsements evidencing that the foregoing policy or policies are in effect. At the DCC's option, DCC shall be allowed to self -insure the insurance coverage as required above. 6.0 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS. 6.1 In all cases, the language in all parts of this MOU shall be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either party, if being agreed that the parties or their agents have all participated in the preparation of this MOU. 010 Page 2 of 9 6.2 This MOU contains the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any prior oral or written statements or agreements between the Parties regarding the operation of the EVENTS. 6.3 No termination of this MOU shall release either party from any liability or obligation hereunder resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the termination of this MOU. 6.4 In the event either party brings any suit or other proceeding with respect to the subject matter or enforcement of this MOU, the prevailing party (as determined by California law) shall, in addition to such other relief as may be awarded, be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses and costs of suit or investigation as actually incurred (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs incurred in establishing the right to indemnification). 6.5 No waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement shall be a continuing waiver thereof. 6.6 This Agreement is not intended to and does not create any joint venture between the parties and each party remains an independent contractor as to the other. Each party shall bear its own liability and there is no joint and several liability as a result of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and DCC have executed this Memorandum as evidenced by the signatures contained below: CITY OF LA QUINTA By: Frank J. Spevacek City Manager Dated: ATTEST: By: Susan Maysels City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: U2 M. Katherine Jenson City Attorney DESERT CLASSIC CHARITIES By: Dated: ATTEST: Lid APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: a Page 3 of 9 Oil EXHIBIT "A" HUMANA Wellness Walk & Healthy Fun Fair Saturday, January 12, 2013 Walk: 8am-10am Fair: 9am-1 pm 0 0 o�***Do 0• •o I�ESERTI fl GCPEPT�ON b16TRIGT To provide a healthy, fun, community event that encourages wellness through healthy eating and active living. Event Outline Wellness Walk — Anticipated attendance: 500-750 people 1. Route a. Bear Creek Path i. Starting at Calle Tampico & Eisenhower Drive 1. The walk will be an "out and back format 2. Four (4) Rest stops — Not to Exceed $300 a. Avenida Carranza i. Snacks / Drinks b. Calle Ensenada i. Snacks / Drinks C. Calle Chillon i. Snacks / Drinks d. Calle Tecate i. Snacks / Drinks 3. Giveaway items a. To be picked up from the event site after conclusion of the walk. i. Water bottle ii. Cap iii. T-shirt iv. Other? 4. Branding — Not to Exceed $2,000 a. New banner and signage templates currently under development with GMR. 5. Miscellaneous Supplies — Not to Exceed $100 Healthy Fun Fair — Anticipated attendance: 2,000-5,000 people 1. Entertainment a. Two (2) stages (infield & left field) i. Infield 12 Page 4 of 9 0 1. Live music — Not to Exceed $3,000 - Musical act/s will be lively and energetic ii. Left field 1. Youth performers from City and DRD programs a. Youth dance troupes 2. Active demos a. Karate/Taekwondo b. Zumba Fitness b. Information booths — Not to Exceed $5,000 i. Includes table and two (2) chairs 1. Hospitals 2. Local health professionals 3. Health based non -profits 4. Health food stores 5. Community partners C. Kids Fun Zone (center field) — Not to Exceed $5,000 i. Inflatables ii. Game booths 1. Four (4) games iii. Lawn games 1. Tug-o-war 2. Sack races d. Food vendors i. Healthy food vendors e. Fitness Center i. Open during event 1. Free admission 2. Equipment demos 2. Branding — Not to Exceed $3,000 a. New banner and signage templates currently under development with GMR. 3. Logistical Rentals — Not to Exceed $4,900 a. $600 - Generators - Five (5) units - 6.5kw or better b. $800 - Umbrella Tables - Twelve 0 2) tables with market umbrellas C. $3,500 - Stage & Sound System - Infield staging with PA system 4. Miscellaneous Supplies — Not to Exceed $300 5. Overnight Security — Not to Exceed $400 a. One guard 6. Administration and Planning 013 Page 5 of 9 a. 15% of total event cost Budget Summary *Walk Promo Items Wellness Walk Healthy Fun Fair Administration & Planning TOTAL *Provided by Humana $ 2,400 $21,600 $ 3,600 $27,600 In future years, this plan could be replicated in other valley cities such as Palm Desert. HUMANA Day @ Certified Farmers' Market o0 0 0 Q 00 Sunday, January 13, 2013 emo 0 8am — 12:30pm r To promote healthy eating through local growers and producers, slow food demonstrations and community education. Event Outline Existing Farmer's Market 1. Local food growers and producers booths a. Fruits b. Vegetables C. Cut flowers d. Honey e. Eggs f. Nuts g. Herbs h. Bread i. Cheese j. Organic meats 2. Live music a. Local musical artist 3. Food Demonstrations — Not to Exceed $500 a. Popular Local Chefs b. La Quinta High School Culinary Program Cooking Contest 4. Branding — Not to Exceed $4,300 a. Naming Rights i. $1,000 — event renamed for one day as Humana Day @ (j 14 Certified Farmers' Market Page 6 of 9 b. Banners i. $2,300 - New banner and signage templates currently under development with GMR. C. Food Service i. $1,000 — Branded cups and plates 5. Logistical Rentals — Not to Exceed $4,600 a. $1,500 — Kitchen Equipment rentals for food demos b. $2,000 — PA system C. $300 — Chairs d. $800 — Demonstration tent 6. Miscellaneous Supplies — Not to Exceed $300 7. Overnight Security — Not to Exceed $400 a. One guard. 8. Administration and Planning a. 15% of total event cost Budget Summary Events Costs $10,100 Admin & Planning $1,300 TOTAL $11,400 Page 7 of 9 EXHIBIT "B" Responsibilities of CITY Wellness Walk and Healthy Fun Fair a. Plan and organize Wellness Walk i. Secure Temporary Use Permit for Wellness Walk and Healthy Fun Fair ii. Coordinate with La Quinta Police Department on traffic safety plan to get walkers from park site to starting location on Bear Creek Trail iii. Provide distance measurements for each rest stop iv. Secure staff and/or volunteers at start and rest stops V. Provide starting area and rest stop signage b. Plan and organize Healthy Fun Fair i. Coordinate with facility owner for approval of event site ii. Coordinate promotional items for distribution to participants iii. Secure Kids Zone amenities iv. Secure stage and sound system for stage V. Secure healthy food vendors vi. Secure health professional agencies for information booths vii. Locate and acquire logistical rentals as detailed in attached event outline viii. Coordinate with Desert Recreation District to provide free admission to Fitness Center for the day and offer equipment demos, etc. ix. Provide marketing materials for event II. Farmers Market a. Coordinate with facility owner for approval b. Coordinate with Farmers Market promoter C. Coordinate with local chefs for food demonstrations d. Secure High School Culinary program for food competition Ill. CITY agrees to expend an amount not to exceed $39,000 to secure event amenities as detailed in the attached event outline. Expenditures shall be reimbursed by DCC within 30 (thirty) days of submitted invoice or receipt. 4 016 Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT "C" Responsibilities of DCC: I. Wellness Walk and Healthy Fun Fair a. Coordinate with CITY for Humana Challenge branding b. Provide Humana Challenge booths II. Farmers Market a. Coordinate with CITY and event promoter for Humana Challenge branding b. Provide Humana Challenge booths with information and ticket sales III. DCC agrees to provide reimbursement payments to CITY for securing event amenities as detailed in the event outline. Payments must be made to CITY within 30 (thirty) days of submitted invoice or receipt. a. CITY shall be paid a total amount not to exceed $39,000. . 017 Page 9 of 9 / T � s ceityl 5 OF ITY SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 501 Amending Portions of Chapter 3.24 "Transient Occupancy Tax;" and adding Chapter 3.25 "Short -Term Vacation Rentals" to Title 3 "Revenue and Finance" of the La Quinta Municipal Code RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Ordinance No. 501 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: 2- STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: As part of the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget, staff presented the City Council with potential revenue enhancement options. One option was establishing a short-term vacation rental program to improve collection of the ten percent (10%) transient occupancy tax (TOT) required from such rentals. This ordinance codifies the means to improve collection of TOT. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed program could generate $300,000 in new revenue during the first year and as much as $600,000 annually thereafter. The City expended $9,960 for consultant services to assist with the establishment of this program. An additional $5,000 may be required to implement this program. The Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget provides for up to $15,000 to be used towards implementing this program. Once the program is underway, additional funds may be necessary to contract for a 24-hour call -service with the responsibility to receive resident calls regarding short- term vacation rental activity. The extent of and cost for. this service will be known once implementation is underway. 018 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On October 2, 2012, the City Council moved to take up Ordinance Number 501 on first reading. The City Council further moved to introduce Ordinance No. 501 on first reading. Both motions were unanimously approved. ALTERNATIVE: Do not adopt the proposed short-term rental program and direct staff to continue to require registration of rentals and the collection of transient occupancy tax in accordance with the current requirements as set forth in Chapter 3.24. Respectfully submitted, Susan Maysels, City CI c ��� ORDINANCE NO. 501 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 3.24 "TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX;" AND ADDING CHAPTER 3.25 "SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS" TO TITLE 3 "REVENUE AND FINANCE" OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta ("City") has the authority under Article 11, Section 5 of the California Constitution and the City Charter to make and enforce all ordinances and regulations with respect to municipal affairs; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to regulate businesses operating within the City; and WHEREAS, short-term vacation rentals of private residences within the City are subject to the City's transient occupancy tax; and WHEREAS, the City has a substantial interest in insuring that all required transient occupancy tax required to be collected and remitted is in fact collected and remitted on a fair and equitable basis as this tax is an integral part of the City's budget. Renters of private homes utilize the City's infrastructure and services and the failure to collect the required taxes from such renters unfairly shifts the burden of their use to the tax payers of City. The proposed regulations have been narrowly tailors to only address the issues of most concern and to provide a mechanism to insure that taxes are collected and remitted on a uniform basis; and WHEREAS, the City desires and intends to amend the La Quinta Municipal Code to ensure compliance with the City's transient occupancy tax to promote accurate collection; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, said City Council heard and considered all testimony and arguments of all interested persons; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 18`h day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and considered the evidence, written and oral, presented at the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: .I_' 020 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 2 SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are adopted as the findings of the City Council SECTION 2. Title 3 Revenue and Finance of the La Quinta Municipal Code, is amended as identified on Exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING:, The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 16`" day of October 2012, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) 021 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 022 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 4 EXHIBIT A Chapter 3.24 Transient Occupancy Tax Section 3.24.020 Definitions "Hotel" means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for use or occupancy by transients, including but not limited to dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, time-share project or facility, dormitory, public or private club, rental space for recreation vehicles, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof, duplex, triplex, single-family dwelling units, including a "short-term vacation rental unit as defined in Chapter 3.25" except any private dwelling house or other individually owned single-family dwelling house unit rented only occasionally (infrequently) and incidentally to the normal occupancy by the owner or his family; provided, that the burden of establishing that the housing or facility is a hotel as defined in this subsection shall be upon the owner or operator thereof who shall file with the tax administrator such information as the tax administrator may require, to establish and maintain such status. 023 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 5 EXHIBIT B 3.24.060 Registration A. Except for short-term vacation rental units as defined in Chapter 3.25 and noted under item C below, every person desiring to engage in or conduct business as operator of a hotel renting to transients within the city shall file with the tax administrator an application for a transient occupancy registration permit for each place of business. Every application for such a permit shall be made upon a form prescribed by the tax administrator and shall set forth the name under which the applicant transacts or intends to transact business, the location of his place of business and such other information as the tax administrator may require. The application shall be signed by the owner if a natural person, by a member or partner, if an association or partnership, by an executive officer or some person specifically authorized by the corporation to sign the application in the case of a corporation. The transient occupancy registration permit must be in effect at all times while the business is in operation and shall be at all times posted in a conspicuous place on the premises. The permit shall, among other things, state the following: 1. Name of hotel; 2. Name of operator; 3. Hotel address; 4. The date upon which the permit was issued; 5. "This Transient Occupancy Registration Permit signifies that the person named on the face hereof has fulfilled the requirements of the Transient Occupancy Tax Chapter by registering with the Tax Administrator for the purpose of collecting from transients the Transient Occupancy Tax and remitting said tax to the Tax Administrator. This Permit does not authorize any person to conduct any unlawful business in any unlawful manner, nor operate a hotel without strictly complying with all applicable laws, including but not limited to those requiring a permit from any board, commission, department or office of this City. This Permit does not apply in lieu of such other permits which are otherwise required." B. At the time of making an application for a registration permit, the applicant shall pay a registration fee of five dollars for each permit issued. 024 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 6 C. Transient Occupancy Tax Registration Permits issued for the operation of short-term vacation rentals prior to the date of this ordinance shall remain in effect until December 31, 2013. The registration of short-term vacation rentals shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions as set forth in Chapter 3.25. IP 025 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 7 EXHIBIT C Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 3.25.010 Title. This chapter shall be referred to as the "Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations." 3.25.020 Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the use of privately owned residential dwellings as short-term vacation rentals that ensure the collection and payment of transient occupancy taxes as provided in Chapter 3.24, and minimize the negative secondary effects of such use on surrounding residential neighborhoods. B. This chapter is not intended to provide any owner of residential property with the right or privilege to violate any private conditions, covenants and restrictions applicable to the owner's property that may prohibit the use of such owner's residential property for short-term vacation rental purposes as defined in this chapter. 3.25.030 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning respectively ascribed to them by this section: "Applicable laws, rules and regulations" means any laws, rules, regulations and codes (whether local, state or federal) pertaining to the use and occupancy of a privately owned dwelling unit as a short-term vacation rental. "Applicant" means the owner of the short-term vacation rental unit or the owner's authorized agent or representative. "Authorized agent or representative" means the designated agency or representative who is responsible for compliance with this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental. "City manager" means that person acting in the capacity of the city manager of the city of La Quinta or designee. "Good neighbor brochure" means a document prepared by the city that summarizes the general rules of conduct, consideration, and respect, including without limitation provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and other applicable 026 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 8 laws, rules or regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of short-term vacation rental units. "Local contact person" means the person designated by the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative who shall be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week for the purpose of: (1) responding within forty- five minutes to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit; and (2) taking remedial action to resolve any such complaints. "Owner" means the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold(s) legal and/or equitable title to the subject short-term vacation rental. "Property" means a residential legal lot of record on which a short-term vacation rental unit is located. "Responsible person" means an occupant of a short-term vacation rental unit who is at least eighteen years of age and who is legally responsible for ensuring that all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and/or their guests comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. "Short-term vacation rental permit" means a permit that permits the use of a privately owned residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and which incorporates by consolidation a transient occupancy permit and a business license otherwise required by Section 3.24.060 of Chapter 3.24 and Section 3.28.020 of Chapter 3.28. "Short-term vacation rental unit" means a privately owned residential dwelling, such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multiple -family attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings, rented for occupancy for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of thirty consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days; except any private dwelling house or other individually owned single-family dwelling house unit rented only once in a calendar year. "Transient" for purposes of this chapter means any person who seeks to rent or who does rent a short-term vacation rental unit. 3.25.040 Authorized agent or representative. A. An owner may authorize an agent or a representative to comply with the requirements of this chapter on behalf of the owner. ..w. 027 Ordinance No. 501 - Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 9 B. Notwithstanding subsection A, the owner shall not be relieved from any personal responsibility and personal liability for noncompliance with any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short- term vacation rental unit, regardless of whether such noncompliance was committed by the owner's authorized agent or representative or the occupants of the owner's short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. 1 3.25.050 Short-term Vacation rental permit —Required. A. The owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative is required to obtain a short-term vacation rental permit and a business license from the city before renting or advertising the availability of a short-term vacation rental unit. B. A short-term vacation rental permit shall be required to be renewed on an annual basis in order to remain valid. 3.25.060 Short-term vacation rental permit —Application. A. The owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative must submit the following information on a short-term vacation rental permit application form provided by the city: 1 . The name, address, and telephone number, and address of the owner of the subject short-term vacation rental unit; 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner's authorized agent or representative, if any; 3. The name, address, and twenty-four hour telephone number of the local contact person; 4. The address of the proposed short-term vacation rental unit, internet listing site and listing number; 5. Contact name and phone number of the homeowner's association, if applicable; 6. The number of bedrooms and the applicable overnight and daytime occupancy limit of the proposed short-term vacation rental unit; 7. Acknowledgement of receipt and inspection of a copy of the good neighbor brochure; 8. Such other information as the city manager or designee deems reasonably necessary to administer this chapter. B. The short-term vacation rental permit application shall be accompanied by an application fee of $25. it 028 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 10 C. A short-term vacation rental permit application may be denied if the applicant has had a prior short-term vacation rental permit for the same unit revoked within the past twelve calendar months. D. Within fourteen days of a change of property ownership, change of owner's agent or representative, or any other change in material facts pertaining to the information contained in the vacation rental permit application, the owner or owner's authorized agent or representative shall submit an application and requisite application fee for a new short-term vacation rental permit, which must be obtained prior to continuing to rent the subject unit as a short-term vacation rental. E. Transient Occupancy Registration Permits issued for the operation of short- term vacation rentals prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall remain in effect until December 31, 2013. All short-term vacation rentals shall be registered annually thereafter in accordance with Section 3.25.050. 3.25.070 Operational requirements and standard conditions. A. The owner and/or owner's authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit is used in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. B. The number of occupants allowed to occupy any given short-term vacation rental unit shall be limited as follows: Total Daytime** Number, of Total of Overnight* Occupants Bedrooms Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants) 0 — Studio 2 8 1 4 8 2 6 8 3 8 12 4 10 16 5 12 18 6 14 20 7 14 20 * Overnight (10:01 p.m. — 6:59 a.m.) " ' 029 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 11 "Daytime (7:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m.) C. While a short-term vacation rental unit is rented, the owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall be available twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week for the purpose of responding within forty-five minutes to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. D. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit do not create unreasonable noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct, or violate any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. E. No radio receiver, musical instrument, phonograph, compact disk player, loudspeaker, karaoke machine, sound amplifier, or any machine, device or equipment that produces or reproduces any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of any short-term vacation rental unit between the hours of ten p.m. and one p.m. F. Prior to occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall: (1) Obtain the contact information of the responsible person; (2) Provide a copy of the good neighbor brochure to the responsible person; and (3) Require such responsible person to execute a formal acknowledgement that he or she is legally responsible for compliance by all occupants of the short- term vacation rental unit and their guests with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. This information shall be maintained by the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative for a period of three years and be made readily available upon request of any officer of the city responsible for the enforcement of any provision of the Municipal Code or any other applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. G. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall, upon notification that the responsible person and/or any occupant and/or guest of the short-term vacation rental unit has created unreasonable noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation unit, promptly respond in a timely and appropriate manner to immediately halt or prevent a recurrence of ii 30 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 12 such conduct by the responsible person and/or any occupants and/or guests. Failure of the owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person to respond to calls or complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental in a timely and appropriate manner shall be subject to all administrative, legal and equitable remedies available to the city. H. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall report to the city manager, or designee, the name, violation, date, and time of disturbance of each person involved in three or more disorderly conduct activities, disturbances or other violations of any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. I. Trash and refuse shall not be left stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection by the city's authorized waste hauler on scheduled trash collection days. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure compliance with all the provisions of Chapter 6.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) of the Municipal Code. J. No sign, as that term is defined in Section 9.160.130 of Chapter 9.160 (Signs), shall be posted on the premises to advertise the availability of the short- term vacation rental unit. Off -site directional signs are prohibited. K. On -site parking shall be allowed on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only. Recreational vehicles may be parked in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 9.60.130 of Chapter 9.60. L. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall post a copy of the short-term vacation rental permit and a copy of the good neighbor brochure in a conspicuous place within the short-term vacation rental unit, and a copy of the good neighbor brochure shall be provided to each occupant of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. M. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the owner and/or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Municipal Code concerning transient occupancy taxes, including, but not limited to, submission of a monthly return in accordance with Section 3.24.070 of Chapter 3.24 of the Municipal Code, which shall be filed monthly even if the short- term vacation rental unit was not rented during each such month. N. The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that 031 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 13 any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated. O. The standard conditions set forth herein may be modified by the city manager, or designee, upon request of the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative based on site -specific circumstances for the purpose of allowing reasonable accommodation of a short-term vacation rental. All requests must be in writing and shall identify how the strict application of the standard conditions creates an unreasonable hardship to a property such that, if the requirement is not modified, reasonable use of the property for a short-term vacation rental would not be allowed. Any hardships identified must relate to physical constraints to the subject site and shall not be self-induced or economic. Any modifications of the standard conditions shall not further exacerbate an already existing problem. P. The owner and/or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall post the current short-term vacation rental permit number on or in any advertisement appearing in any newspaper, magazine, brochure, television trade paper, Internet website, etc., that promotes the availability or existence of a short-term vacation rental unit in a place or location deemed acceptable by the city manager or designee. In the instance of audio -only advertising of the same, the short-term vacation rental permit number shall be read as part of the advertising. 3.25.080 Recordkeeping duties. The owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall maintain for a period of three years, records in such form as the tax administrator (as defined in Chapter 3.24) may require to determine the amount of transient occupancy tax owed to the city. The tax administrator shall have the right to inspect such records at all reasonable times, which may be subject to the subpoena by the tax administrator pursuant to Section 3.24.140 (Records) of Chapter 3.24 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of the Municipal Code. 3.25.090 Violations. A. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this chapter by any of the occupants, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. B. Permit Modification, Suspension and Revocation. A violation of any provision of this chapter by any of the occupants, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall constitute grounds for modification, suspension and/or revocation of the short-term vacation rental permit 032 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LQ Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 14 and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 2.04.100 (Appeals to Council) of Chapter 2.04. C. Notice of Violation. The City may issue a notice of violation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to 1.01.300 (Notices —Service) of the Municipal Code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by the any of the above parties. D. Administration Citation. The City may issue an administrative citation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citation) of the Municipal Code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from also issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. E. Misdemeanor Citation. The city may issue a misdemeanor citation to any occupant, responsible party, owner(s) or the owner's authorized agent or representative. Every violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment. F. Public Nuisance. It shall be a public nuisance for any person to commit, cause or maintain a . violation of this chapter, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1 .01.250 (Violations public nuisances) of Chapter 1.01 (Code Adopted). 033 Ordinance No. 501 Amendment to LO Code -Short-term Vacation Rental Adopted: Page 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ► ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 501 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 2nd day of October, 2012, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 16th of October, 2012, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-1 15. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 034 T-df 4 4 a" CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Approval to Award a Contract to CONSENT CALENDAR: ✓ Construct the Fred Waring Drive Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 201 1-04 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award a contract to Kasa Construction, Inc., in the amount of $727,729, to construct the Fred Waring Drive Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 201 1-04. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This project entails constructing median island landscape, irrigation and lighting improvements on Fred Waring Drive, from Washington Street to Adams Street. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is included within the Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 through 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) adopted by the City Council on April 5, 2011. The project is programmed to receive funding in the amount of $1,198,604 from a combination of Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds and developer/surety contributions for design, construction, inspection and administration of the project. The City has received funding contributions from Mayer Villa Capri ($183,564), Bella Vista ($100,000), and Starlight Dunes ($102,000). The City's Transportation DIF will make up the difference of $813,040 for a total estimated cost of $1,198;604. The lowest responsive bid was received from Kasa Construction, Inc., in the amount of $727,729 for the construction of the project. Considering expenditures to date for design of the project as well as anticipated construction administration and inspection costs adequate funding is available to support the construction award to Kasa Construction, Inc. 035 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The project is located on Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and Adams Street (Attachment 1). The proposed improvements include the installation of plants, irrigation, and low level lighting within the existing median islands. The landscape palette will be the approved "desertscape" theme for primary image corridors. The City received two (2) sealed bids for the construction of this project on September 6, 2012. A detailed bid comparison summary is provided for the City Council's review as Attachment 2. Kasa Construction, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $727,729. Contingent upon City Council's approval to award a contract to construct the project on October 16, 2012, the following is the anticipated project schedule: Sign Contract/Mobilize Construction (45 working days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES: October 17 - 31, 2012 November 2012 to January 2013 February 2013 This project implements the actions initiated when the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 201 1 /2012 through 2015/2016 CIP. The only alternatives are to not proceed with or reduce the scope of this project. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS The project is 100% funded with locally generated funds (either developer fees or bonds). Therefore, because of the City's status as a Charter City, the project was bid without prevailing wage rate requirements. Respectfully submitted, f imothy oon, P.E. Public Works Di ector/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison Summary 036 CITY OF PALM DESERT Colonel Mitchell Paige School Legend ®LAQUINTA PALM DESERT INDIAN WELLS BERMUDA DUNES (UNINCORPORATED) Horizon ® _ High School ®PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS VICINITY MAP Not to Scale CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 7, 2012 4 fTEM TITLE: Approval of the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate, and Authorization to Advertise for Bid, the Fred Waring Drive Median Island Landscape Improvements, Project No. 2011-04 DEPT. DIRECTOR: STAFF CONTACT: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Bryan McKinney, P.E., Principal Engineer 037 CITY OF LA GUINTA 2011-1-04 ATTACHMENT 2 20 FRED WARING DRIVE MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE KASA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 8 W SIMMONS INC. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE E%TENDED UNIT PRICE EXTENDED EXTENDED 1 Mobilization PRICE PRICE UNIT PRICE PRICE 2 Traffic Control i 1 1 233 47 133 LS LS LS CY SF 315,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $5.00 40.25 315000.00 $20000.00 $5000.00 $1 165.00 $11 763.21 523,000.00 $8,800.00 $1,500.00 532.00 $0.35 323 OOO.lX1 AR 800,00 $1 500.p0 57 456,00 616 496.55 83],500.00 b24200.00 324400.00 330.00 50.14 537500.00 31-201 624400.00 86 990.00 Sfi 598.62 3 Oust Control 4 Fill Material Fine Groom 5 Furnish and Install Irrigation / Electrical 6 Street Crossin Trench and Sleeve 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,540.00 $5,540.00 7 Furnish and Install 2" Depth Decomposed Granite Fines with Stabilizer Color 1 13,89fi SF $0.60 $8,337.60 $1.40 $19,454.40 $0.75 $10,422.DD 6 Furnish and Install 2" Depth Decomposed Granite Fines with Stabilizer Color 2 16,198 SF $0.60 $9,718.80 $1,45 $23,487.1C $1.25 $20,247.50 9 Furnish and Install 2' Diameter California Gold Boulders 35 EA $130.00 $4,550.00 $130.00 $4,550.00 $45.00 $1,575.00 10 Furnish and Install 3Diameter California Gold Boulders 70 EA $220.00 $15,400.00 $160.00 $11,200.00 $80.00 $5,600.00 11 Furnish and Install 4' Diameter Celifornla GoldBouers P4 EA $300.00 $7,200.00 $200.00 $4,800,00 $550.00 $13,200.00 12 furnish anldtl Install Parma-Loc "Asphalt Edge Black 3/16" x 4" x 16' 2,225 LF $4.00 $8,900.00 $9.00 $20,025.00 $5.80 $12,905.00 13 Furnish antl Install 4" - 8" Alaimo Cobble Decorative Rock 10,962 SF $2,00 $21,924.00 $3.50 $38,367.00 $5.50 Sfi0,291.00 Furnish and Install complete irrigation 14 system per plan. (Hot tap service line, water 1 LS $182,602.00 $182,602C0 $210,000.00 $210,000.00 $170,156.00 $170,156.00 meter and backflow preventer by CVWD) Furnish and Install Electrical / Lighting 15 System (Net Including Fixture Cost and 1 LS $109,024.00 5109,024.00 $109,000.00 $109,000.00 $87,500.00 $87,500.00 mark u 16 Furnish and Install Brahea Armata 3' Hi h 8 Eq $500.00 $4 000.00 $300.00 $2 400.00 $]50.00 $6 000.00 17 18 FurnisM1 and Install Brahea Armata 4' Hi h 5 EA $650.00 93 250.00 1500.00 $2 500.00 $800.00 $4 001 Furnish antl Install Brahea Armata 5' Hi h 3 EA $800.00 $P 400.00 $700.00 $2 100.00 $850.00 $2 550.00 19 Furnish and Install Weshingtonia Robusta 10' BTH 12 EA $650,00 $7,800.00 $450.00 $5,400,00 $500,00 $6,000.00 20 Furnish antl Install Washingronia Robusta 2'BTHJ 15 EA $780DO $11,700.00 $550.00 $8,250,00 $550.00 $8,250.00 21 Furnishshand Install Washingtonis Robusta 4' BTH 13 EA 9910.00 $11,830.00 $650,00 $8,450.00 $600.00 $7,800,00 22 Furnish and Install Crematoria Humilis 8 EA $400.00 $3 200,00 $350,00 $2 800.00 $300.p0 $2 400.00 23 Furnish antl Install Acacia Stenophylla 124" Box 18 EA $300.00 $5,400.00 $230,00 $4,140.00 $300.00 b5,400.00 24 Furnish and Install Cercidium Floritlum (24" Box 21 EA $300,00 $6,300.00 $230.00 $4,830.00 $300,00 36,300.00 25 Furnish and Install Pyrus Kawakami (24" Box 17 EA $300.00 $5,100.00 $230.00 83,910.00 5315.00 $5, 355.00 26 Furnish and Install Lagerstroemia Indica "Put Box2] 20 EA $300.00 $6,000.00 $230.00 $4,fi00.00 $2]5.00 $5,500.00 FurnisInstall Chilops'a Lmearis nst "Monws' Box28 15 EA $300.00 94,500.00 $230.00 $3,450.00 $300.00 $4,50000 FurnisInstall 5 gallon Bougainvillea 'Do-L29FurnisInstall 67 EA $25.00 $1,675.00 $20.00 $1,340.00 $25.00 51,8]5.00 5 gallon Caesalphnia WBox24" Pulchernma44 EA $25.00 $1,100.00 $17.00 $748.00 $25.00 $1,100.00 30 FurnisInstall 5 gallon Cassia Nemo31 45 EA $25.00 8112500 $17CO $]65.00 $25.00 $1,125.00 FurnisInstall 5 gallon Dasylirion Wrnis32 33 EA 525.00 4825.00 $17.00 $561.00 $25.00 $825,00 FurnisInstall 10" Diameter Echlns Grusonii 43 EA $50.00 $2,150,00 $30,00 $1,290.110 $150.00 $6,450.00 33 Furnish antl Install ]Cane Minimum Fou uleria S lantlens 63 $95.00 $4,085.00 $70.00 $3,010.00 $300.00 $12,901 34 Furnish and Install 5 gallon Hesperaloe Parviflora 91 EA $25.00 $2,275.00 $17CO $1,54TOO $17.00 $1,547.00 35 Furnish and Install 1 gallon Lantana Camara 42 EA $15,00 $630.00 $8.00 $336,00 $7.00 $294.00 36 Furnish and Install 1 gallon Lantana Montevidensis 76 EA $15.00 $1,140.00 $8C0 $608.00 47.00 $532.00 37 Furnish and Install 5 gallon Leucophyllum Frutescens 64 EA $25.00 $1,600.00 $17,00 $1,088,00 $11.00 $704.00 38 Furnish antl Install 5 allon Salvia Grimpii 27 EA $25DO 1 $675.00 $17.00 $459.00 $11.00 $297.00 39 Furnish and Install 5 gallon Rustle Britmmona 33 EA $25,00 S25.0C $17.00 $561.00 $13.00 $429.00 40 1 Year Maintenance / Plant Establishment 1 EA $12,000,00 $12 000.00 310,000.00 $10 000.00 515 000.00 315 000.00 Subtotal 11[ama 1 through 401: $527189.65 -' 8 78 278t06 8694 068.12 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 1 Furnish Well Li h[Fixture Kim Li brio 1 122 EA 51,000.00 $122000,00 $1,225.00 $14 445000 $1250.00 $152500C Subtotal (AEBitiva Alternate 1 &Items 40: ) $849.169.66 +y+473},}29.0 $746,658.12 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 1 lFurnish Well Light Fixture BK Lightini 122 EA $700.00 125400.00 11, 155.00 $140910.00 $1325.00 4161650.00 Subtotal (Additive Alternate 2 & It... 1- 90: 8612, 589.85 $719,189D5 $]55,708.12 TOTAL $734 689.65 $868 639.05 8908 208.12 038 Ii Indicates Staff correction of the math. Tihf 4 4V a" AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY/SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of the On -Site Improvements for Tract CONSENT CALENDAR: Map No. 33076-2, Madison Club, East of Madison, LLC STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the on -site improvements as specified in the approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) to October 18, 2013 for Tract Map No. 33076-2, Madison Club, East of Madison, LLC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The developer, East of Madison, LLC, requests a fourth additional one year time extension of the SIA to complete items for final acceptance of the on -site improvements. Staff has not received any requests from residents for these improvements and therefore recommends approval of this time extension. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Madison Club (Tract Map No. 33076-2) is located south of Avenue 52, east of Madison Street, and west of Monroe Street (Attachment 1). To date, the City Council has granted the following SIA extensions: • May 15, 2007 extended to December 31, 2007 • February 16, 2010 extended to December 31, 2010 • October 18, 2011 extended to October 18, 2012. 039 In a letter dated July 24, 2012 (Attachment 2), the developer requests an additional one year time extension. The developer has requested time to complete the following: preparing record drawings, setting survey monuments, and completing the punch list items resulting from a final inspection. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request, place the developer in default, and direct the City Attorney to pursue the developer's bonds for these improvements; or approve the request with a different time extension period. Respectfully submitted, imothy Jon s n, P.E. Public orks Di ector/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from East of Madison, LLC dated July 24, 2012 G 4 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TO OCTOBER 18, 2013 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 33076-2, THE MADISON CLUB WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract Map No. 33076-2, The Madison Club, on November 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by October 18, 2012, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved SIA allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of the on -site improvements as required by the approved SIA is extended to October 18, 2013. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on October 18, 2013. If the Subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. 041 Resolution No. 2012- Tract Map No. 33076-2, The Madison Club Adopted: October 16, 2012 Page 2 Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 161" day of October 2012, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 042 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 33076-2 THE MADISON CLUB 33076 V I C I N I r NOT TO SCALE 043 ATTACHMENT 2 — THE — MADISON CLUB July 24, 2012 Amy Wu City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering Dept. PO Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico LA Quinta, CA 92247-1504 RE: Madison Club— Time extension for completion of improvements for Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969 On -site and Off -site. Amy: Due to economic conditions and slower than expected lot sales, East of Madison, LLC (EOM) is requesting a one year extension for the completion of on -site and off -site work associated with Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969. EOM will continue to work diligently to complete Site Improvements throughout the community, and address the interests of its neighbors, local municipalities and other governing agencies. We have commenced the final punch list of all in -tract improvements, and are establishing milestones by which to implement the remaining off -site improvements. EOM proposes to commence the off -site landscape work along Avenue 53 within one (1) year of the requested extension and will then continue to work through the balance of the off -site landscape based on the City of La Quinta's desired sequence of work. Thank you for considering our request for a time extension. EAST OF Jeff PrevostID hitect VP Developt Madison Club DISCOVERY COMPANY (602)920-7183 iorevostOd iscovervlandco.com DEVELOPM&NT OFFICE Mwzv�no Aunxaea:. PO Box I¢82, Lw QvzxTw. CA 922¢7 Srxe ET Annxess: 80-955 Avxxve 52, LA Qvzxrw, CA 92253 T-1760391-5072 Fwx 76o 398-5788 TO44 CITY SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution Approving Amendment No. 7 to the Disposition and Development Agreement Between Successor Agency to La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and CP Development La Quinta, LLC RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: 15 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution approving Amendment No. 7 to the Disposition and Development Agreement entered into by and between the Successor Agency to La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and CP Development La Quinta, LLC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: La Quinta Retirement Residence, L.P. has purchased a 9.5 acre lot from CP .Development La Quinta, LLC to develop a senior retirement community. Therefore, the Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") must be amended to reflect the change in land use from affordable housing to senior residential. This entails deleting the provisions and attachments applicable to affordable housing and modifying the scope of development to include the senior living facilities. DDA Amendment No. 7 is included as Attachment 1. FISCAL IMPACT: The DDA amendment provides the developer shall reimburse the Successor Agency for all costs incurred by the Successor Agency to negotiate, prepare, and process the amendment. The original DDA required the former Redevelopment Agency to provide a $2,520,000 loan to finance the affordable housing construction. Because the affordable housing provisions will be deleted via this amendment, the Successor Agency would no longer be responsible for providing this assistance. f'45 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On December 18, 2003, the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") with CP Development La Quinta, LLC for the sale and development of 50 acres located at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue. CP Development La Quinta has developed what is now known as Centre Pointe, which includes a Homewood Suites Hotel, Applebee's Restaurant, Eisenhower Health Center, and 44 casitas units. La Quinta Retirement Residence, L.P. purchased the 9.5 acre parcel that was originally slated for affordable housing. The parcel, along with an adjacent parcel, was to include a mixture of 27 single family market rate homes and 40 single family, moderate -income affordable homes. The new property owner and developer, Lenity Group, LLC, are proposing to develop a three-story retirement facility, four duplex cottage units, an assisted living facility, and a memory care facility. This requires modifying the DDA provisions relative to the change in land use and scope of development. As noted above, the DDA Amendment deletes the affordable housing funding provision. The proposed senior retirement development does not require Successor Agency financial assistance. The project entitlements were approved by the Planning Commission on September 25, 2012; the City Council is holding a public hearing today. If the project is approved by the City Council, then this DDA amendment must also be approved. ALTERNATIVE: If the City Council approves this project at its public hearing today, then this DDA amendment must be approved to accommodate land use and scope changes. Alternatively, if the City Council chooses to not approve the project, then the Successor Agency is.not obligated to approve the DDA amendment. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Powell Economic Development/Housing Manager Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 7 to Disposition and Development Agreement 046 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment No. 7") is made and entered into as of , 2012 by and between CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic ("Successor Agency"), and LA QUINfA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership ("Developer"). RECITALS: A. On or about December 18, 2003, the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and CP Development La Quinta, LLC (the "Original Developer") entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement (the "Original DDA"), pursuant to which the Agency sold to the Original Developer that certain real property located southeast of the Miles Avenue and Washington Street intersection in the City of La Quinta, California 92253 (the "Property") and the Original Developer agreed to construct, complete, and operate thereon a commercial project containing a medical office/surgical facility, a development containing sanctuary villas, a mid -price suites hotel, a resort -style condominium/casitas development, two (2) sit-down restaurants, and two (2) single-family residential developments, with forty (40) of the single-family homes restricted for sale to income -eligible buyers at a restricted sales price (collectively, the "Original Project"). B. The Original DDA has been amended on six (6) occasions, on or about October 28, 2004, on or about December 7, 2004, on or about November 2, 2005, on or about October 20, 2006, on or about August 23, 2007, and on or about March 19, 2008 (collectively, the "Prior DDA Amendments"). The Original DDA, as amended by the Prior DDA Amendments, is hereinafter referred to as the "DDA", and the Original Project, as amended by the Prior DDA Amendments, is hereinafter referred to as the "Project." C. The Original Developer previously processed through the City Lot Line Adjustment No. 2006-452, which reconfigured the parcels previously designated as "Parcel 6," "Parcel 7," and "Parcel 8" of Parcel Map 31116, in Book 212, at Pages 60-66, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Riverside County Records, into "Parcel A" and "Parcel B". Parcel A has since been sold to Eisenhower Medical Center and medical facilities have since been constructed thereon. D. On or about July 1, 2011, the Original Developer sold Parcel B to Developer for the purpose of Developer's construction thereon of (i) a one hundred thirty-two (132) suite retirement community, (ii) four (4) single -story duplex cottages, (iii) a seventy-two (72) suite assisted living community, and (iv) a thirty-two (32) bed memory care facility (collectively, the "Senior Living Facility)." Parcel B is legally described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. E. On June 28, 2011, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 26 ("ABxl 26") and Assembly Bill 27 ("ABxl 27") from the 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session of the California Legislature. ABxl 26 immediately suspended all redevelopment agency activities, except 1"15610-0061 3052035.3 e0921112 -1- h ^ 7 r �t continued performance of "enforceable obligations," and set forth a process to dissolve redevelopment agencies and end redevelopment in California. ABxl 27 provided a "voluntary alternative redevelopment program," which would have allowed redevelopment agencies to remain in existence and continue redevelopment, if remittance payments were made to cover the State of California's budget shortfall for fiscal year 2011-12 and were made in subsequent fiscal years to cover State costs. A lawsuit was filed, challenging the constitutionality of both ABx 126 and 27. The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of ABxl 26, revising the effective dates of certain provisions, and struck down as unconstitutional ABxl 27. (California Redevelopment Assn. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal At' 231 ("CRA Case"). ABxl 26 is chapter 5, Statutes 2011, First Extraordinary Session, which added Part 1.8 (suspension provisions) and Part 1.85 (dissolution provisions) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code. Under the CRA Case, all redevelopment agencies dissolved February 1, 2012. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 341710), added by Part 1.85 of Division 24, and City Council Resolution No. 2012-002, the City of La Quinta ("City") is the "successor agency" to the former Agency. F. On June 27, 2012, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 1484 from the 2011-2012 Regular Session of the California Legislature ("AB 1484"), which established that successor agencies are separate legal entities from the entities that provide for their governance. As a result of AB 1484, the successor agency to the former Agency is now formally the "City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency". G. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 7, Developer and Successor Agency now wish to modify certain terms set forth in the DDA with respect to Parcel B. Unless defined herein to the contrary, all capitalized terms in this Amendment No. 7 shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the DDA. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: The DDA is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100 entitled "Definitions" is modified to delete the following definitions, in their entirety: Affordable Homes, Affordable Homes Mix, Affordable Housing Component, Affordable Housing Cost, Agency Loan Amount, Buyer Affordable Housing Documents, Declaration, Deed of Trust, Disbursement Schedule, Eligible Buyer, Parcel 7 Residential Development, Residential Development, Residential Development Site Map, Promissory Note, and Unrestricted Homes. 2. Section 100 entitled "Definitions" is modified add the following as new definitions: 882/015610-Ml - !) 8 3052035.3 a09/21/12 —2— e "Senior Living Facility" means (i) a one hundred thirty-two (132) suite retirement community located in five (5) single -story duplex cottages, (ii) a seventy-two (72) suite assisted living community, and (iii) a thirty-two (32) bed memory care facility. "Parcel B" means Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. 2006-452 in the City of La Quinta, California. 3. Section 100 entitled "Definitions" is modified to revise the following definitions: 3.1 To revise the definition of "Phase of Development" by adding as a new Phase of Development to be developed on Parcel B the "Senior Living Facility." 3.2 To revise the definition of "Project" by adding as a new Project component the development of the Senior Living Facility. 4. Sections 400-404 entitled "Agency Loan; Homebuyer Assistance" are hereby deleted in their entirety. 5. The following attachments are hereby deleted, in their entirety: Attachment No. 5, entitled "Disbursement Schedule and Procedures," Attachment No. 6, entitled "Affordable Homes Mix," Attachment No. 7, entitled "Parcel 7 Residential Development Site Map," Attachment No. 9, entitled "Promissory Note," and Attachment No. 15, entitled "Declaration." 6. Attachment No. 8 entitled "Scope of Development" is hereby modified to replace paragraph ILE thereof with the following: "Senior Living Facility: The Project will contain a senior living facility (the "Senior Living Facility"). The Senior Living Facility will include (i) a one hundred thirty-two (132) suite retirement community, (ii) four (4) single -story duplex cottages, (iii) a seventy-two (72) suite assisted living community, and (iv) a thirty-two (32) bed memory care facility. The Senior Living Facility will be developed in a series of one (1), two (2) and three (3) story structures to be built on Parcel B. 7. The effectiveness of this Amendment No. 7 is conditioned on the execution by Developer and the Original Developer of an assignment and assumption agreement, in a form approved by counsel to the Successor Agency, pursuant to which the Original Developer assigns to the Developer and the Developer assumes from the Original Developer all of the Original Developer's rights and obligations under the DDA with respect to Parcel B and the Senior Living Facility. 8. Developer shall reimburse Successor Agency for all of the costs Successor Agency incurs or has incurred to negotiate, prepare and process this Amendment No. 7. 9. The Successor Agency has the authority to issue this Notice pursuant to ABxl.26 and the City's election to be the successor agency to the Agency. The Successor Agency's liability shall be limited, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34173(e), to the sum of '82/015610-0061 3052035.3 a0921/12 -3- 00 property tax revenue it receives pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code and the value of assets transferred to it as the successor agency to the Agency. In no manner whatsoever does the Successor Agency's actions impose any obligation or liability on any funds or revenues in the City of La Quinta General Fund or other City of La Quinta fund or account that is not specifically for and in the name of the Successor Agency. 10. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Amendment No. 7, all of the terms and conditions of the DDA shall remain in full force and effect. 11. In the event of any action between or amongst the parties hereto seeking enforcement of any of the terms and conditions to this Amendment No. 7, the prevailing party in such action shall be awarded, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief, its reasonable costs and expenses, including without limitation its expert witness fees and reasonable attorney's fees. 12. This Amendment No. 7 shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as if prepared by all of the parties hereto. 13. This Amendment No. 7 shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of California and any question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to such law. The Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Riverside, or such other appropriate court in such county, shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any litigation between the parties concerning this Amendment No. 7. Service of process on the Successor Agency shall be made in accordance with California law. Service of process on Developer shall be made in any manner permitted by California law and shall be effective whether served inside or outside California. 14. Time is of the essence of this Amendment No. 7 and of each and every term and provision hereof. 15. A waiver of a provision hereof, or modification of any provision herein contained, shall be effective only if said waiver or modification is in writing, and signed by Successor Agency and Developer. No waiver of any breach or default by any party hereto shall be considered to be a waiver of any breach or default unless expressly provided herein or in the waiver. 16. This Amendment No. 7 may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when this Amendment No. 7 has been signed by all the parties hereto, shall be deemed, an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 17. The. person(s) executing this Amendment No. 7 on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 7 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 7 such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 7, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 7 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which such party is bound. 882/015610-0061 3052035.3 a092 V 12 4- 1 ? 5 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Successor Agency and Developer each hereby represents that it has read this Amendment No. 7, understands it, and hereby executes this Amendment No. 7 to be effective as of the day and year first written above. Date: Ob6tA 2012 Date: 12012 ATTEST: Susan Maysels Successor Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP M. Katherine Jenson Successor Agency Counsel 8821015610-W61 3052035.3 a0921/12 -5- "Developer" LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership By: La Quinta GP LLC, a Washington limited liability company Its: General Partner By: Hawthorn Management Services Corp., a Washington co oration Its: Man<a By: Barton G. Colson Its: President "Successor Agency" CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic L-M Frank J. Spevacek, Executive Director 051 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real properly in the CJty of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of CaUfomia, described as . follows PARCEL B AS SHOWN ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2006452 AS EVIDENCED BY DkuMEN'T RECORDED APRIL 19, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO.2006-02OD726 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PARCEL 8 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 31116, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 212, AT PAGES 60 THROUGH 66, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS, BEING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 8 THROUGH THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1) NORTH 430 56' 44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 152.65 FEET; (2) THENCE NORTH DD" 12' 13' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 790.73 FEET; (3) THENCE SOUTH 890 47' 47' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 239.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING.A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET; (4) THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 450 27' 41"1 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 63.48 FEET; (5) THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 440 44' 32' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 490 06 37" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 8 AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 230 54' 45"1 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 183.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 840.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 250 11' 52" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 7, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 040 02' 08', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 7; "V015610-0061 :t (1 3052035.3 a0921112 -6- V THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 7 THROUGH THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES- (1) SOUTH 160 39' 14" EAST AND NON -TANGENT TO LAST SAID CURVE, AS DISTANCE OF 55.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET; (2) THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 200 41' 22", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 90.27 FEET; (3) THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 040 02' 08' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 333.46 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINES OF PARCEL 7 AND ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 8, SOUTH 50010' 13' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 592.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. `t EXCEPTING THEREFROM AGENCY EXCEPTS AND RESERVES FROM THE CONVEYANCE, HEREIN DESCRIBED ALL INTEREST OF THE AGENCY IN OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (SOD) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO DRILL INTO, THROUGH, AND TO USE AND OCCUPY ALL PARTS OF THE PROPERTY LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (S00) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEROF FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES INCIDENTAL TO THE EXPLORATION FOR AND PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES OR MINERALS FROM SAID PROPERTY OR OTHER LANDS, BUT WITHOUT, HOWEVER, ANY RIGHT TO USE EITHER THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY OR ANY PORTION THEROF WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SURFACE FOR ANY PURPOSE OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, OR TO USE THE PROPERTY IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO CREATE A DISTURBANCE TO THE USE OR ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RECORDED DECEMBER 09, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 04.979137 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 604-630-027-6 30 2035.3 e021„2 -7- 053 SEE SHEET 2 FOR ANNOTATION TABLES —( _ AND NOTES o. PARCEL S R2 54 DETAIL 'A• ACCESS i LANDSCAPE ES . DEDICATED HEREON �.: [LOT 'r a SCALE: 1' - 200' .IIIA MSA Co I I OR I T MOB Rw am Dim Tma emm n PARCEL B R12 `ACCESS 77 AL ACCESS I I SLOT LINE TO BE BELEr IV PARCEL •B• I 9451 AC. PARCEL S NEW ADJUSTED LOT UNE u•a �LQT UNE TO BE DELETED •� ^RT PARCEL 7 .y SEE DEEM FT AT UPPER LEFT yob NE'LY LINE OR 64/54694 NSULTING,INC. LEG Sawa k ASSOCYAM jm 6asnNO LOT LINE TO BE DELERD — — a L. Enmm EMSRNC LOT LINE TO RENNN a RAx Mum a CA NM NEW ADJUSTED LOT LINE NOM a PA CM(B 723-7M.T RESTRICTED ACCESS J.N. 1612 PER P►LBJ•N• 1612 PER z1�60-66-66 882/0156I0-006I 3052035.3 09(21/12 -8- 054 ,r RESOLUTION SA 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FORMER LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND MILES AVENUE WHEREAS, pursuant to authority under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) ("CRL"), on or about December 18, 2003, the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement ("Original Agreement") with CP Development La Quinta, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer"), pursuant to which the Agency conveyed to the Developer certain real property located within the Agency's Project Area No. 2 (the "Property") for the Developer's development thereon of a commercial project containing a medical office/clinic, a boutique hotel, a mid -price suites hotel, a resort -style condominium/casitas development, two sit-down restaurants, and two single-family residential developments, with forty of the single-family homes restricted for sale to moderate - income buyers at an affordable housing cost, all as more particularly described in the Original Agreement (collectively, the "Original Project"); and WHEREAS, the Agency and Developer have amended the Original Agreement on six prior occasions, for purposes of revising, among other things, timelines for and various components of the Original Project (as amended, the "Agreement" or the "Project", as applicable); and WHEREAS, the Developer has sold the portion of the Property designated pursuant to the Agreement to be developed with 40 affordable single-family homes (the "Subject Property") to La Quinta Retirement Residence Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ("LQRRLP"); and WHEREAS, LQRRLP has processed through the City and has obtained the approvals and entitlements necessary to develop on the Subject Property a senior living facility that will include, (i) a 132 suite retirement community, (ii) four single -story duplex cottages, (iii) a 72 suite assisted living community, and (iv) a 32 bed memory care facility; and WHEREAS, as part of the 2011-12 State budget bill, the California Legislature enacted and the Governor signed, ABx1 26, requiring that each redevelopment agency be dissolved; and o55 Resolution No. SA 2012- CP Development La Quints, LLC DDA - Amendment 7 Adopted: October 16, 2012 WHEREAS, an action challenging the constitutionality of ABx1 26 and companion bill ABx1 27 was filed in the California Supreme Court by the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California Cities, and two individual cities; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2011, the Court upheld ABx1 26 and struck down as unconstitutional ABx1 27; and WHEREAS, pursuant to (i) Health and Safety Code section 34171(j), added by ABx1 26 and amended by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted by the California Legislature and signed by the Governor on June 27, 2012, and (ii) City Council Resolution No. 2012-002, the City of La Quinta ("City") is the "successor agency" to the former Agency, and in such capacity acts as the "City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177(i), added by ABx1 26, successor agencies are required to oversee development of properties until the contracted work has been completed; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has negotiated with the LQRRLP a seventh amendment to the Agreement to address the modifications desired by LQRRLP with respect to the Subject Property ("Amendment No. 7"); and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 7 is of benefit to the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein. SECTION 2. That Amendment No. 7 is in the best interests of the citizens of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 3. That Amendment No. 7, a copy of which is on file with the Successor Agency Secretary, is hereby approved, subject to (i) the adoption by the City Council of the City of La Quinta of an Ordinance approving an amendment to that certain Development Agreement entered into by and between the City and the Developer on or about December 18, 2003 (the "DA") that makes conforming changes to the DA. 056 Resolution No. SA 2012- CP Development La Quints, LLC DDA - Amendment 7 Adopted: October 16, 2012 SECTION 4. The Successor Agency Executive Director and Successor Agency Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to (i) make final modifications to Amendment No. 7 that are consistent with the substantive terms of Amendment No. 7 approved hereby, and to thereafter sign Amendment No. 7 on behalf of the Successor Agency, and (ii) take such other and further actions, and sign such other and further documents that require the Successor Agency's signature, as may be necessary and proper to carry out the terms of Amendment No. 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held this 16th day of October, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Susan Maysels Successor Agency Secretary City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON Successor Agency Counsel City of La Quinta, California DON ADOLPH, Successor Agency Chair City of La Quinta, California t 057 Tar 4 4V a" CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time for Completion of the On -Site Improvements for Tract Map No. 34968, Madison Club Villas, East of Madison, LLC RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the on -site improvements for Tract Map No. 34968, Madison Club Villas, East of Madison, LLC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The developer requests an additional one year time extension of the SIA to complete the remaining on -site improvements. Staff has not received any requests for these improvements and therefore recommends approval of this time extension. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Madison Club Villas (Tract Map No. 34968) is located within the Madison Club Subdivision which is located south of Avenue 52, east of Madison Street, and west of Monroe Street (Attachment 1). To date, the City Council has granted the following SIA extensions: • February 16, 2010 extended to November 30, 2010 • October 18, 2011 extended to October 18, 2012. In a letter dated July 24, 2012 (Attachment 2), the developer requests an additional 01 5 8 one year time extension. The developer has requested time to complete the remaining on -site improvements for Villas No. 12 through 19. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request, place the developer in default, and direct the City Attorney to pursue the developer's bonds for these improvements; or approve the request with a different time extension period. Respectfully submitted, othy R ona n, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity.Map 2. Letter from East of Madison, LLC dated July 24, 2012 r�59 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TO OCTOBER 18, 2013 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 34968, THE MADISON CLUB VILLAS WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract Map No. 34968, The Madison Club Villas, on April 16, 2008; and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by October 18, 2012, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved SIA allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of the on -site improvements as required by the approved SIA is extended to October 18, 2013. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on October 18, 2013. If the Subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. n60 Resolution No. 2012- Tract Map No. 34968, The Madison Club Villas Adopted: October 16, 2012 Page 2 Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 161h day of October 2012, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 061 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 34968 MADISON CLUB VILLAS AVE. I 52 TRACT NO. � § I AVE. 54, 34968 AIRPORT BLVD. ;INITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 062 ATTACHMENT 2 -T88- MADI$ON CLUB July 24, 2012 Amy Wu City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering Dept. PO Box 1504 78.495 Calle Tampico LA Quinta, CA 92247-1504 RE: Madison Club —Time extension for completion of improvements for Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969 On -site and Off -site. Amy: Due to economic conditions and slower than expected lot sales, East of Madison, LLC (EOM) is requesting a one year extension for the completion of on -site and off -site work associated with Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969. EOM will continue to work diligently to complete Site Improvements throughout the community, and address the interests of its neighbors, local municipalities and other governing agencies. We have commenced the final punch list of all in -tract improvements, and are establishing milestones by which to implement the remaining off -site Improvements. EOM proposes to commence the off -site landscape work along Avenue 53 within one (1) year of the requested extension and will then continue to work through the balance of the off -site landscape based on the City of La Quinta's desired sequence of work. Thank you for considering our request for a time extension. Respectful ubmitted, EAST OF 1 Jeff Prevost chitect VP Develop t Madison Club DISCOVERY D COMPANY (602)920-7183 iorevost(&d iscovervlandco.com DEVELOPMENT OFFICZ M.n .o Auaaaw. PO Box 1482, LA Qvwai , CA 92241 Smear Anonass: 80-955Avavve 52, LA QvrorA, CA 92253 T.L 760391-507z FAx 76o 398-5788 I 63 AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA /'FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the Time BUSINESS SESSION: for Completion of the On -Site Improvements for Tract CONSENT CALENDAR: Map No. 34969, Madison Club Clubhouse, East of Madison, LLC STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution to extend the time for completion of the on -site improvements for Tract Map No. 34969, Madison Club Clubhouse, East of Madison, LLC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The developer requests a third one year time extension of the SIA to complete items for final acceptance of the on -site improvements. Staff has not received requests from the residents for these improvements and therefore recommends approval of this time extension. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Madison Club Clubhouse (Tract Map No. 34969) is located within the Madison Club Subdivision which is south of Avenue 52, east of Madison Street, and west of Monroe Street (Attachment 1). To date, the City Council has granted the following SIA extensions: • February 16, 2010 extended to November 30, 2010 • October 18, 2011 extended to October 18, 2012. In a letter dated July 24, 2012 (Attachment 2), the developer requests an additional 064 one year time extension. The developer has requested time to complete the punch list items resulting from final inspection and obtain utility agency acceptance letters. ALTERNATIVES: Deny the request, place the developer in default, and direct the City Attorney to pursue the developer's bonds for these improvements; or approve the request with a different time extension period. Respectfully submitted, imothy R. na P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter from East of Madison, LLC dated July 24, 2012 P.65 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TO OCTOBER 18, 2013 FOR TRACT MAP NO. 34969, THE MADISON CLUB CLUBHOUSE WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Tract Map No. 34969, The Madison Club Clubhouse, on April 16, 2008; and WHEREAS, Section 6. Completion of Improvements, of the approved SIA requires that the Subdivider begin construction of the improvements within ninety days and complete the construction within twelve months after the approval of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, failure by the Subdivider to complete construction of the improvements by October 18, 2012, shall constitute cause for the City, in its sole discretion and when it deems necessary, to declare the Subdivider in default of the approved agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 8. Time Extension, of the approved SIA allows for, at the City Council's sole and absolute discretion, an extension of time for completion of the improvements with additions or revisions to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1. The time for the completion of the on -site improvements as required by the approved SIA is extended to October 18, 2013. Section 2. The time extension for completing the improvements shall expire when City offices close for regular business on October 18, 2013. If the Subdivider has not completed the improvements, the City, in its sole discretion and when deems necessary, may declare the Subdivider in default of the Agreement. Section 3. The provided security amount as required in the approved SIA is satisfactory. No additional securities are required. 66 Resolution No. 2012- Tract Map No. 34969, The Madison Club Clubhouse Adopted: October 16, 2012 Page 2 Section 4. All other terms, responsibilities and conditions as listed in the. approved SIA shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 161h day of October 2012, by the following vote, to wit:. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 067 ATTACHMENT 1 TM 34969 MADISON CLUB CLUBHOUSE AVE. 1 52 ��� TRACT N0. � AVE. 54 34969 AIRPORT BLVD. VICINITY M. NOT TO SCALE 068 ATTACHMENT 2 - THE - MADISON CLUB July 24, 2012 Amy Wu City of La Quinta Public Works/Engineering Dept. PO Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico LA Quinta,CA 92247-1504 RE: Madison Club —Time extension for completion of improvements for Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969 On -site and Off -site. Amy: Due to economic conditions and slower than expected lot sales, East of Madison, LLC (EOM) is requesting a one year extension for the completion of on -site and off -site work associated with Tracts 33076-1; 33076-2; 34968; & 34969. EOM will continue to work diligently to complete Site Improvements throughout the community, and address the interests of its neighbors, local municipalities and other governing agencies. We have commenced the final punch list of all in -tract improvements, and are establishing milestones by which to implement the remaining off -site improvements. EOM proposes to commence the off -site landscape work along Avenue 53 within one (1) year of the requested extension and will then continue to work through the balance of the off -site landscape based on the City of La Quinta's desired sequence of work. Thank you for considering our request for a time extension. Respectful ubmitted, EAST OF Jeff Prevost chitect VP Develop t Madison Club DISCOVERY D COMPANY (602)920-7183 iorevost(&d iscovervlandco.com DEVELOPMENT OFFICE M.:., o Anncas:. PO Eox 1489, L CA 92247 ST... T Aoo aase: 80-955 AVEEVE 52, Ls Qmnrw, CA 92253 TEL 760 391-5072 F.- 760 398-5788 ' f i9 ITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Demand Register Dated October 16, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Demand Register Dated October 16, 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: None. FISCAL IMPACT: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION:_? CONSENT CALENDAR: / STUDY SESSION: PIIRLir HF_ARTNG: Demand of Cash City $1,617,866.07 Demand of Cash -Successor Agency of RDA $150,245.00 Demand of Cash — HA $27,547.33 Demand of Cash — HA Comm $0.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Prepaid Warrants: 97321 - 97343 } $166,322.59 97344 - 97366 } $82.084.82 Voids) $0.00 Wire Transfers} $913,173.61 P/R 36687 — 36693} $202,351.12 P/R Tax Transfers } $52,912.79 070 Payable Warrants: 97367 - 97469) $378,813.47 $1,795,658.40 ALTERNATIVES: None. Respectfully submitted, &19461C�- Robbeyn93ird, Finance Director 071 CITY OF LA QUINTA BANK TRANSACTIONS 9/26/12 - 10/9/12 09/27/12 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 09/28/12 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 09/28/12 WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 10/01/12 WIRE TRANSFER - US BANK -DEBT SVC 10/02/12 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 10/02/12 WIRE TRANSFER - TASC 10/04/12 WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK TOTAL WIRE TRANSFER OUT $56,963.74 $9,381.16 $142.50 $578,086.25 $106,182.08 $1,332.60 $161,085.28 $913,173.61 072 wvN o r 2 0 r b N b m I[1 b e w b o q b 0 N NNW r Uf ; r O w v M M w P b M v po oz w rc� wa i do I d w z I zr Z. r Mc w ri r s a • r r r xc »< r � � w w s z owr z Lwr O rQd�r nr MM oo NNv qN.r 00 00 0o POP oo bb NN NN ow NN N If11[1 r WU r NN PP oo vva0 I�No ee 00 mm bob MM .+.+ MO mIIIP 00 I7' . . U r UN r 'r rI bb vv vvm I�vN vv eo 00 NON ww mm bb vv POP NN m Q rZwr bb NN bb PPm mbin ww bb 00 ONo bb oe MP bb wmo NN N r ap r nr W W w wNv MM .-INM ww qP bb MM vet M rf r f• LL r v �} .a w .I .a M M rwOr ww IL r Wf r � d• W r Zr r i r r v w M f� n .+.•� M Ln r w w O O P N NN r r M b .I 00 on v w M MM m .+ Ill No o 0 r b M M vv MM M N b bb M N M b bb M b In W In M M v M Ill Ill In In Ill W In In .+ .I .1 .+.1 Ill Y1 .I N .•� In M 2 r Z r N N .+ M M .I.a Ill Ill M NN w o w M v Inmy w � r � r v v In vv vv v v v vv In r v v v v z or r l I r U r v W e MM 00 OO N N v m m Y r U r W W O O O 0 InO O O O 00 O O Z Q r O O O 00 00 O O O no O w O O 00 O O M W W O M �T m r r r Y I e e O 00 00 O O o 00 o v e O 00 0 0 K W f r N r I N W N N N NN NN N N N NN N N N N NN N N r r O O o 00 0o O O o 00 O O O O 00- o O Y N N N NN NN N N N NN N N N N NN N N W r I- P P P PP 0 P P P qo 0 P P P q P S r a O O O 00 00 O O O 00 O O O O O O U r p \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ O O O 00 00 O O O 00 O O O O 00 O O J r r m r r Q r • r Q rO0. Zr d .d 0 z Z r w ,r 0 P P P w .•r w N v P P P .+ N P f� f� P N O r W .I 0 m mm mm w f� P ma a0 P f� a0 bb t0 P O r S0 , Ifl v v vv mIn Ill v v vv v v v v vv v v U r UZ r 0 e e 00 00 O o 0 o0 0 o 0 0 0o o 0 U r= O O O 00 00 O O O 00 O O O O 00 O O Q r O O O O 00 00 O O O 00 O O O O 00 O O r> N U N z w S w w F Z > W w W N. > L W w Z O n N N K > w O Q W w 0 d 2 U J L J w LL U d O N Z w Q O N Z 0 0 H z w d z w Y a w J W U M Q w w Q Q H J � Q Z W O K Q O U U W a W a0 r K r w O: w a 2 m Y Y Z L > v Z .0w. Y Q /- L W d' Q U Y Q Z 0 K r pL r W 3 U p W J K U 2 z Q Z N OY r ZQ r > p w J Z O W w �- J LL 2 r W 2 r d' O: O w N d' X H m LL N > J z O W Z 0 S w o U UO r U W O N H > W U O 3 S 2 K 3 Q z Ur r m U U J J J S h w Z Q Q Q p O O U U U o fLL r N J Z v N M O N N O O \bwN r C P v I� W rI w v O m b O N N v O O M O J r O O r N N •+ v W b \L WrZZI o (9Q3 r w w J r > W LLLO r r m P e N M v In b t` m P o N Y.000 r b b b f� r r r n n r r r n 0 m m Qp r Y M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M d o Y Y r U l 1� r r r r I� r r r r r f� I� n r f� .+q d'd'r~-IQ r SZ � P P P P P P P P P P P P q P P Rq. . 073 ddUm 10 1 N OtN 1 \ I Y J I � O r•I M O Ifl N M I U Q I O 1 x O 1 N m M m N WNW I UL- 1 M Ill m M Ot 0W I Q m IL s oZ oz M 1 W WW 1 ao a 1 1 z 1 zw z ax I z 1. 1 Z P o N m n Ot b EU O rl p•I 1[1 V e•1 W N O b O b O n z I o W r Z I x W 1 o r QN I N - mm .�.� bb POmr m NN 00 om mm=oMN MNM bb 'T T oo mm -O \ 1 IT oo .r .•r MM rINbO Ill 111 NN PP Oo 000�1mN I()Nm nr �}�} bb bb U W U I U I UN 1 m mm lfl lfl mm MM� o wo NN mm NN O=CNN� ON. (l o bb 00 MM Q I zh11 N mm mm I(1 V'MM mm NN wo NN Oe On No MNb N bb 00 mm - .414. M Wm NM Vv mm OI(l 111 %7'Nn NN�1 nn .•I Ir NN bb H I HLL I �tM C.•IM I I••I O I .•I I = 1 W f r K W 1 z1 1 1 o P O NNN .+ m N O rrrnn rr .•� N M N I(1 W lf1 O m O O o O o o O N N b Illy 4(1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 Il m bb M b M b Ill Ill Ifl m v N N Ill m111 mIll mIll lf1 W m V m M ((1 m 1- 1 N �i r•I .1 r-1 rl M .I 'I N M M M M M Ill m N .0 I••I z 1 z 1 N N W M M M .+ Ill M N .1 .•r N'I .+ '1'1 N M m M m 1 1 M It 01 IT VV Z 1 O r r 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 Y I U r O 0 O o00 0 o e O O0000 00 Ill o o O 2 Q I o 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0000o ee o 0 0 0 m I 1 1 1 11 I .Y M nl r4 ti ti p•I I•M r-1 .-1 rl N ^I'1 M �4 .-1 r4 M Y O O O 000 O O O O 00000 00 O O O O m '•1 rl rl .y'I N ti 'r p•1 r-I rl ri rl r-1'1 �I'I ^I rl N ^I K W F N (7 W 1 1 N N N NNN N N N N NNNNN NN N N N N R' 1 1 rl M e4 '1 rl ^I r-1 rl M .y '1'I ••I'1 M '1 ri rl � rl M 1 I O O O 000 O O O O 00000 00 O O O O Y N N N NNN N N N N NNNNN NN N N N N U 1 W 1 \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ W I H 1 P P P PPP P P P P PPPPP PP P P P P 2 I Q I o e O ee0 O O O O o000o Oe O O o 0 1 O O O 000 O O O0 00000 00 O O O O W 1 .y I•I r-I .i .1 .1 .4 .M .4 'r ti p•1 'Ir-1 .-I .•I .1 .y .y N p•I J 1 I m 1 a } oo t a •z I r 1 ti N F z I m I N N P mmm P .-I P Q O.-1Nmm NP N -P .•I Ot m 1 W r n m mmm m .-1 m m bbbmm nm O 1 xO 1 V Of Ymo m W m m mmmmo mm 0 v m V U 1 U2 I o 0 0 omo 0 0 0 o eoee0 Oe O o 0 0 000 O O O O 00000 00 O O O O Q 10 1 o 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 00000 00 0 0 0 0 I > 1 x u z I a o o LL } H In0 a O M O I 1 z Q 1xi 4 K LL U W O J O z 1 1 H U W O M J } > W 1 1 Q W U U O J 3 I 1 j m H } 1U0 Wi U f W z 0 U a W q Y W W z Q ra z m Q W N W H 0 O S- W M 0 M m H 1 y H H U O U W U Y J �t z 1 o W I Q W W f W W > r+ J w W w I qx I z Y Q J U Q W Q ti O w W N OY 1 ZQ I . U m W W 3 F U f x o W + W Z I W Z I O Q r•1 Q O W Q U Q 1- W W I> Iz F F F F W J W W W (D M Jm 1 W W - W Y. O W W 1- 0 Q z z W Q W W W z z Q U 0 0 N Q I -I UO I I Z W F M W m z O. U w 6 W J Q 01 1 O O Q W W W U 0 (D rr J Q O Y. N +W I IU U p q q o O W W LL LL LL (D W (7 .1 QQ I O hLL I N J z m M Ill b b Ill m n P b O \bV 1 I O M M N N N m P O P M P M m e P�MJ 1 o 0 I N O M o Ill Ill m m m N b v M OMOJ 1 pO r M b V N Ill N \z WIzx1 obQ; 1 W 1 4 J I > q W S LL o I R'QOo 1 1 m m m m m m m m P P P P P P P QyI Y M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M o wD Fz I U r r r n r r r r n n r r r r n I Wo r C y w Q I x z I aac�m U I w 074 M v N I ON O o 0 0 o e o O O r Ill O P O O b 1I1 O O 0 O o rl V O N 0 1 SOo I N e b m r Ill P 0 Ill b M O n N Q N W I U k- i b b Yl ll1 M m N r .+ a m 1 M M ti x o1 2 1 N 1 W W W S' ao a ow Z I Z S' I ZI FI 1 z 0W1 Z I Z W I O 1 Qy. 1 on e00 00 00 00 00 Ifl 111 NMO bn00 00 rr 111111 00 PP =Mo lllYl O \ r 00 Obb o0 00 =r1 � bnVo 00 00 ^I .r vv 00 NN oe0 U I W U I U 1 UN 1 00 Obb � v rr o0 00 NNI TO MP Oo llllll nn om rr PP 100 Q 1 gp Z.. mw a N0 bb mm nn Ill 111 nn�7P lflno�t Ill 111 bb MM 00 rr NN 000 I Qq I bb vNb Ill 111 lfl lfl .+.nM 'IPnm NN rr .... Mr .. F I fLL 1 �v MM .1 N. lit NN 1 HO I MM .i rr I S 1 W H I Z 1 1 IT m ti o o N N N CNN O o N P .r O Nnr o Oo b o 0 o Illll m mom o o Ill .9 O �t lllMM I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 bbb MMM O O b M M b bbb 1' M 411I1 � M r b ILl 111 111 �t �t �t M .+ 111 v v m wwN W I I m Z l M .+.r m " - m Ln m Ln Ln Z Z I ..I M M Ifl rl v M M M .r Ill 111 N �? M .I .+ M 111 m m > > I v V M M �t IT N7 �I �. �t N M �T �t 121 �t �} q �t Z O I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U I M M�1 O N O O � mb O O M N O M ill Ill111 mmm Y U I O 00 O O O O 0 O O O O O O 000 Z 1 Q I o 00 0 0 0 0 000 moo 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Q 1 I nr o .X M M rnn Il1MM o M MMM m 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y 1 O 00 O O O O 000 OOO O O O O O O 000 � 1 W 1 1 1 y 1 1 co W I 1 N NN N N N N NNN NNN N N N N N N NNN =cw - O 00 O O O O 000 000 O O O e O O Y N NN N N N N NNN NNN N N N N N N NNN W 1 f P PP P P P P PPP PPP P P P P P P PPP S I Q O 00 O O O O 000 000 O O e O O O 000 U 1 O \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ O Oo O o O o 000 000 0 o O O o 0 000 J 1 1 W 1 1 Q y .00. a la N 1 Z I W 1 N NM N P �1 �1 �T �i 111 mmm O �t 0 N N �t NNN 0 I W 1 n M o r m ."1 'I P P�'1 m m m m m m n n P n n n O 12O 1 v =0 0 v m O cc= oom 0 111 m m m m Qvm U I UZ 1 0 00 O O O O Oeo 00o O o o O o O o00 c� I 1 0 00 0 0 o e ooe oee e e e o 0 0 000 Q 1 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 > 1 Z U U 0 0 O R Z J K U rr z O m O Z N N (D Z W 1 I (g (g O Z H Z a z o z z 1-I Z 2 f I -I W 2 I-+ 1' Ir W Q O = Ir f- a Z Ir W U S Z 0 U U N O F J Ir r1 (J O W W U Z u U J 2 /- S' N O W Ir K Q E w N 0 Z m z I o J 6' a N Q I -I I -I J W O N W �t I OW I Q J Z Y 1' J Z 3 W N Z Z I Z I 6, W W 0 O Y S U a Q O > N O N O Y 1Z Q I Z U U Z F 1 Ir Y 2 U .+ LL Z I W Z I K m UI W Ir N H N Q Ira 1> W S Z Z W f O W W O a W UI M M Jm 1 f H } O H W Z > J z m z z W 0 2 -% U H 6 O W Z OI U0 1 W Q Z Z W W !9 Q- O 6 J Z z W W w 1 I K W W W W W w O O Y Z Z Z W 6' N � W. I w 2 S S S 2 2 S S 2 Ir Ir Ir > Y \ b 1 K P%m o J l 0 OMOJ 1 00 I o0a31w I r J 1 > O.. W=ILO 1 n m P O N M �i lIl b n m P O nl S'QOO 1 cm wog Z I U 1 n r n n r n n n n n n n r r r n KKI~-Ia 1 22 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P ` 15 O N 1 O o O o o m o EO O w w O n o P b w IWF-I o O P o b�} o n Ill Ill N o M o b 0 o I SO I o M o M �t o b b w O Iq N b N q WNm I Uf W W 1 LL L o oz r w I w I ww W K ao a ow I Z Z I 1' 21w I z or1 z ILw1 p I¢ w 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O m 0 0 wo U o w 0 0 N N N N 0 0 m P n 0 0 P P V N b Iwu. a 00 Oo 000 0o NON 00 a0 oe NN NN oo nMw Oo NN nwm . UQ 1 UZNw I O 0MM Oo0 nB Ill YNN o0o MM ."e Wo bb olofe-.N b0v NNb "mo. I ¢q 1 O .+.+ Ill illo oO MPN PP .�.+ ww ww bb .r lllb F I fLL 1 w MM NNIII NN br ww ww .0 1 0 0 L W w I K W I Z I I M o MMV Nr w w e N b o Om M N e0 I I 1 I 11 0 o NN �t bN M b O b M wM M b MM cc W I I m f I w w NN w .+w w Ill N w Itl P wP w w ww L I Z 1 W N OO N MM Ill wV M w w Illw Ill Ill ww 1[l Ill Z I O 1 I I I I 1 11 Y I U I o O 00 @ o0 0 0 o O. O o 0o O O o0 Z I Q I O O 00 m 00 O O O O O O 00 O O 00 Q M w PP rr M �t M r b' Ill 011l M M 00 m 1 I I I I I I a I o o MM o 00 0 0 0 0 0 o ro 0 o bo m I I w w NN c ww .+ w w .r .1 rl Nw w w Ill 111 I (r I W f y w 1 W I I N N NN N NN N N N N N N NN N N NN O O 00 O 00 O O O O O O 00 O O 00 Y N N NN N NN N N N N N N NN N N NN W I h P P PP P PP P P P P P P PP P P PP x I¢ o 0 00 0 00 o e e o 0 0 00 0 0 0.0 e o 00 0 /oo o O o o e o 00 0 0 00 J m Q a 0. ¢ P .z1 a .a N I I Z IK o �1 mP P �tV P P Vf P N N PQ w PP O I W w w oo m PP m a0 w m r r mP w mm O 12 O I Ill Ill Ill N c V ILl c Vt 0O Ill Ill �1 �t U I UZ I O o 00 0 00 0 o e O O O O o 00 U I� O O 00 O 00 O O O O O O 00 O O 00 Q 1 O O O 00 O 00 O O O O O O 00 O O 00 U Z J J O w IN M Q 0 W w d w l q U U m h Z 4 N Q w w 1 Q W w > U N > p: ¢ I q x 2 w I I Z 2 0W w w x 2 w Z I O 0 Z Z Z N w W N w W O O 0 2 K H LL w J z z U' IL LL H Y O w U f Z N f N t z L U m K J 3 6 H Q O 49 S J a Z Q. W W Q m w 1 C > J W w ¢ pC w W U 3 Z W w .. Z I OW I z J 0w Q d N U W Q a LL > K 1 qL I O Q Q O J R Q LL Z N Q Q N OI ZQ I U N Y X J O Q J 3 U Z w LLZ I W Z I z z 1' W W Z x Z J J w w¢ I> 1 N w w Q J J w N w J W N Q M Jm l 1 m W1- .a Q m O O U q Q Q 0 O a u J 3 O q w Z UO I. w Z Z N N N w X q W L � (7 I K 6 6 Q Q ¢ Q ¢ J O Q Q U W w O N •OG I Y J J J J J J J J J L L L L L L O LL I N JzIll tll Ill b �t M w N M o Ill r r w \mV I K Cb P O Ill P b P m w m w O N �t M O Mas 1 0 m M m b M n M w m N N N Ill P r x W I Z00 Z \ I I O U'Q31W w J I > q . I WLLLo l KKHQ I =Z 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P o1 1LLUm I U 1 IJ v MAN 1 ON n o o O o m m o O o b O M UQ P O O O 0 0 N o O o �f o I 1 III o N o b III M M O N b O o I S O I .•I O O M IT O Ifl N b N N W N W I U h 1 N Ill N M o N ^I n m O O 1 O Z N 1 WI• 1 W d' do d mw Z.ZK I r1 1 z of 1 2 Z W I O QpC I MOOOOOnO00nn ee 00 Oo �i.•1I win OO 00 OO bb no O \ I .•. 00 00 oOm CO10MPnw mm N NONN 00 00 oe �?�f no U IWUI . . . . ..•I000bP U I UN 1 bltl lllO oO.+ILI llIo ml/I OO NN IllNo .•1 �lNnb / MM OO 00 bb OO Q I ZM I PnNlllo llln nNlllP.4 00 00 .+.•IM III IIIMOV 00 00 O Obi m III NN bb NN NN i Fq 1 1/1M.I NIII m IIIM.•1n bN .i .1 1l1 111 'INN .•I 1-IM 00 MPN .n ^I nn mO I HLL I '1N �t bm PP .•1 nlM IS W 1 KW W I 1 Zr V 1 I 1 n'In Ononnoon o M �t �t .+.+NN Ito O IIl N q n 1 1 0o O.•IO.•I00.I .10 0 �? e0 OONN o or -I O �} I o I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I r 11 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 In oYI N III N Ill I/1NNN o M Vq bbbb .+ N e M M b N 1 1 MmMMMMMMMMM M �i MM III I/I 111111 M MlMM o M �t M M W W 1 1 m Y- 1 .n r-I I-1 I -I I-1 r-1 .1 .1 .1 dp ti N N Ifl r-I N N M .i .•I N i Z1 IIIWWWIII W III III M IIIM N ti NN N Ill m 0 41 N N o 1 1 I/l W 111111 lllW lllN ONv N m �t �T CCIAM Vet Il 1l1 V �t 't Z 1 O 1 1 I I r I 1 11 1 1 1 U r N�?.1b n0rl lllm m.-I O o Ill 111 N O Y 1 U I bO�t �tbnmm�bo 0 o IflW =000 o no e O o Ill e 2 Q I nmmmmmtO mClmO O O 00 0000 O 00 O O O O O o 0 1I11 �? N O O .•1 n n .4 M M 1l1 P I m I I r 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I ri ti .-1 .tl .� .I .4 ^1 '1 .•I ^1 I -I .1 .-I NN .•I .r .1 .1 .•I .r } OnO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O O O M � v � v � v v .-I .-I YI .� .n ti I 1 [Y I W r N M W N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NO N N U 1 W 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W I H 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P= P 00 P P P P P 2 I Q 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O on O O O O O no O O O O O U 1 p 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O on O O O O O no O O O O O W 1 .-1 .y .4 .1 .M .n .4 ^1 '1 '1 I••I I-1 r-1 ♦1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .-1 .-1 .Y .. .•1 .y r-I r-1 J m Q Y 1001 Q •Z 1 1 M 1 H Z I K Illb nmPO.IN M�1111 N NN nn.. ..1 cm V P P 0 N 1 W PPPPP000000 ti n nn bb.•1 ..I .•I ow .•I m m m n O IUZI W vet IIIIII Ill Ill Ct It 1 V Z I O OQQOIlll/INWIIIN O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 no 0 o O o o O o O o =in O e m e m O 0 O (J 1 = IO u O O O O O O O O O O O O no O O O O O no O O O O O Q 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 > M ti 1 W W F z LL Q M O O K W Ir U 1 K d o o p 1 U W O J J Z N U 1 1 2 U J Y O O Z Z H [C f Z U O H Q N J F u W u C w .. a z Q H N Z [C H 2 2 H Q U H m rl 1 z f N W W O U U f It Z low, J Q m Z d N W H Y CG z J K 1 pZ 1 O O Q W W W Z 6 CG > 0 N Om 1 Z Q 1 J CC p W W d Q Z W LL Z I W Z I z Q 0 W m Z Z «Q I> p Z N W O q N aM O O M J m 1 I U O O F- U Y Q OC U U .4 Q I I 1-I f• Ir N Z d !J Q U0 1 1 FI f W W H J d J d (9 1 Q Q a w 2 Q Q J O > 0 N .y 1 Z Z z Z 0 O d d d d d z .1 QQ 1 O HLL 1 NJ2 I I n III .+ b n �2 O III O N N N m Il1 N P v7J 1 0 N m O m 1l1 m O .-1 M OMOJ1001 b .I V b b m M. 1 o(ZDQ3 1 WZ .1 J 1 > WLLLO I w n m P O .. N M Ill b n m 1 N N N M M M 10 M M M M M Q CC 1 Y Ix �t �t �t �t V la �t �t IT IT V d f.9>Y I U n n n n n n n n n n n n W O f Z l W O I P P P P P P P P P P P P KKUw 1 ij7 d d1 u 1 o- b TN o 120 1 b N n O N N M Ifl N r N P WNW I OF 1 r M Q In IL s qo Oz W I- W MO 1 a zw I f2 1 1 1= 4 I 1 6 I a r Ik x Ix >« x s r a a O z I 2 SWI O 1 Q[r I mm rr oe Yl uloo rnv mwI PrIOMOom 0e Oo �t �t NPn�TMbNew Oo U I WU 1 rr rn oo PnOr NMb Illm �T MOmOON oo Ill 111 �T �T bPPlfIMmVMm 00 . . . U I UM I M..+ Oo 0o "N, cPm Illob MMnmPP oo NN bb Nlll NMITC.N Illlfl Q I X. I bb NN nn PmNO �TrN MN Mm�TPPM VIM NN nr PST �T nInN V'MN PP Fq I bb �tV �TMr �TmM MM�T MM PST �T �T MM N MP I �-LL I M M MM N M M N N rz MM 1 M O I IS 1 W I 1 w w W I 2 I v1 o Ill M M M c Ill N v v O r m n r .•I M N .� .•I .•I n .+.+.-� .M o N N MIA e0 MMMWp m 'T m OOMN0000 �T I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I N M M m " W MMMb Mb �TNNN M M bbbbbbbb M I M �T M ITM" 1[1 YnMImMM Ill M Ill 1[1 111 111 Yl 111 111 111 111 c I I m F I M In M PmMM PP -MMMMM M M IIIM MAI S M �T IIIV M 2 I M N Ill .+IfIM ItIM M.+ Ill 111 111 tflN m W W .•+bbMlllN MN .+ > > I v V v vIiv 11v IT IT ITTIfIT IT IT�T J vVvv 4T vvv Ill Z O 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I U I b b M W.c OV mg 9m9mm M N Ill NNNNNNNN O Y U I o Ill O O O O O O 0 o 0 0 CID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z I ¢1 0 0 o === OO Oo oo0op o o e op000eoo 0 Q 1 n Ill M MMn er MIA OMOMM M M M �TbbVMYI �T IfI O m 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 .y .y rl Mry r.l O.4 M.4 MID norCQ 0 0 0 o0 c0 =00 0..IMm. M M Y e o 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 K W I N I 1 M I (� W 1 N N N N N N MIN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N K M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O MID O e O O O' O O O O O O O O O O O O N NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N U I W I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W I f. I P P P P P P 0 P P P P PPP (PI P P P P P P P P P P P P 2 I Q O O O O e O 00 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O O O O W M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M J m a Y'Mo. a •z I a a M F Z I K P N M N P P n m N N N NNN N P M M Ill b n n n P P P P Iw m r M rmm mm rr rrrrn m M M bbbbbmmm m w Ifl =Mo =0 vv MOCCQ a Ill 0 mmQMO=M= m U IUzI o m 0 Moo 0o Oo QOOOQ 0 0 0 000000eo 0 U 1 0 1 o m e O o o O o 0 0 0 Opp O 0 o o O O O O O O O O o ¢ .0 o o e 000 00 00 0000p o 0 0 000p0000 0 Z H U S U M Q Q > M 1 K S M Y Z W O Y M U S M 1 H LL J J M Y. H 1 2 Z S ¢ K Q O U O 1 W M z cr F M q Z S (g I I O U Z W M W O I I J z J Z 2 m M I p• Z U M N f- W V Z 1 OW I M J J M J U m > O U pl I I W q O O Q J W Q N O Y I ZQ I U q Y O O O Q Z q M LL 2 1 W Z I M M l- a a U > Y Y N M Q I> J m W W W W M Jlq 1 m Y. N Y Y 2 2 S Q J J W N Z LL Z coo. Ia > 71 4Q > > > > a a o lg 1 W M O 2 S O O O O 1- F H N 6¢-C 1 o FLL 1 NJS M b b m n Ill YI M M m P \bMN I K IP m P�TOJ I OI N O N N O n' b P M n m IT =MaJ-Mo. v v b b Ill Ic b Ill \ i W 1 zz I 0043 > M J > I I q.. WSLLO V Q O O I I"), �i �t �T �t �T IT V �T �T .c Ill Q K I Y Ict I U n n n r r n n n r n r n wot-z I WOI P 'CPI P M1um1U P P It 078 nVN ON I 1 o O m P o P o o Ill m H e b O ri b O v O O IA b M O M I U Q 1 v v n r b o v M T o o 12 0 1 P In H v P H V O M I[1 M WNW I UI- I M v b M M N Ill Ill M m CD W Q m I N b v H M a n z 0 H 1 WW1' aO a UI W Z I zoe I H 1 Z H 1� Q 1 Ik IN, IN, Y IN IN, 1, llt M[ R • Y OI z IZwI 0 I QN I a 00 NOWIntoPP 0000 on Ill l/l OMbmmOOOOmlllm Mm.+ 00 IQ nMb 00 HH 00b MOV, 00 OOoo 0o Ill l/l OObmMOOOOMMb ONM 00 U I WU I . . U I UN I 00 vv OMV nn nn I OHV 00 vv aOPVVveOnlllb OM VMP 0 0 Q IP ZHI woM Wl(1 VV I-II-Im �Tv PP nP1[1H VV 00 I VNmOlr nIn If11/l I Fq I r1NM �v V V .-I .IM MM N Ill 111 Yl l/l =10 OMM .+N lllP q' HM NVw Nbm I FLL I N N V V vv .IH H N r IM IT I IWH1 S W I 2 1 I I I .r. Ill O NV 0 .I MMM O IN ON o bb V .•I Nv O O vO O I 1 11 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 010 M N b b N V 000 N b C 1 I vv v M Ill 111 M Ill vvV M Ill WWWNWMMMMIf1 Y1 WW M W m I N N 1-1 M H H I(i .-I .4 .4 M r•I H H M .4 .i .1 .i .4 '1 rl H .41Y m Z. Z NN Ill m b 0M NO MMM b Ill IIIW III III III M I[1 I/IW WIII MM N > > I m vv v b vv v �I �t N 2 01 1 I I I I I I U I WN O MM b MMM H Ill Itl 111111111111 �l Qlll V lfl 111 NOV 0 Y UN Ill 111 O o 0o O 0 o O o 0oOOOOOo 00 No QI no O O ooe a moo o O ooMM oM00000 0o No Q 1111/l O b nn n v nnn b M MMMMMnMMMMM rr O m 1 I 1 1 I I 11 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 H M .4 .i H H H H'1.4 14 .i .4 H H H'1 r•I H .4 .1 e-I .-1 .y r4 m .4 .-1 b .i H .4 H 'I M 14 H .4 rl .i H .-1 rI .4 .•1 H 14 .i .M .4 ..� ti .4 OC W H N H W I 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y. .Y .•1 .-1 .4 .1 '1 '1 .•1 '1 H H H .i .4 .4 .1 rI .i ry N H H H H .1 .1 .1 O O O O O O O O o 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U I W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P P P P P P 0 0 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 2 I Q 1 on O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O U Ip I \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Im O O O J I m Q > I O O I Q •Z I a a N F Z 1 NN N o PP P .1 PPP N P nnnnnmPOHlpP br �T O I W I W rn n H me) 01 a0mm r m bbbVVVVnra0 a0 oC H O I SO I vv v t/l vv v 0 Ill=0 v ITvVvvvvvvvvv t Ill/l Ill U IUZI O O O O on e O 00 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 10 I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q .0 no m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I > U U z W W Z W Z W I I N H (Y. H W W Q W I I U O 0 U U 0 Q J IU-I H Z Z W 0 > I I > f 0 H H H - W z W I W H z UI U O N W 1 W 0 H w W O H U W 0 0 z z W W J > H O z Q W O IM J w Q J 0 U Q Q W Z W Q. Z Q W W J U Z S 0 f H U Z J Q U W (L H H U z m O O J M H I OC z H W CD W q W z 0 H W v z NOW , Q 6 Q W Z H Z W 0 !- S 0: I qS I H > Q W O J Q O U N OYIZQI J 2 0 m H O z 1 z H .-I 4 Z I W z I 0. U z X U W O W O z HQ I> Ia W Z W Q 0 H > fA W M J m 1 I Q 1- Q LL N Z F- W Q a .1 Q I ILL OC N LL Z W Q J f m UO I I z z C 6. Q Q q U J z 1 m ON O W W O W W Z Q Q H H W N . W 1 1 0 F- f H 1- F- > > > > > 3 H Q Q 1 o FLL I NJZ I 1 m O M r W M N n Ill H N Ill \bHN I K I O NO Ifl No b Ill NO NOn .1 1 m v M 0 r M v b m O M O J I g 0 1 b b b N Iq b \S W I zZ I o CDQ31 W I J I > WZLLo 1 I w .-I KQOO 1 I O W M W W W W Ili W V V b QZ I Y I � v v v v v v v v v riv 0 { I U I r r n n n n n n r r n r W of z I WOI HQISZI 471 iLILumlU 1 ON r n N O O o e N \ r Y J r O b O O O 1f1 M M U Q r N W r N O m N r v O i SOo r W M b �7 N 111 WNw Uf r N m v .y b Y1 U' W a a om r 0 2 WW W R' ao a W r f- Z z r 6' r Z. r z O r Swr r Qp: r nM1 tf10 nN o0 00 00 eo NN O \ r 00 ObPb 00 00 00 If11B MM U W U r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U r UN r NN N 19 Q r ZH r W W ON.10 bb Vet NN If11[f 6V.V mm � A r NN v .+.y bb t[1 lfl H i M O r S W W r K W r Z � v i r N OOM o o N m b r b OO.y o e M M b N .+ V M I[1 W r Mv" N N N LA N N .•� S r 2 r M MN v M > > V NNQ M M Ifl v v 2 U r M o ov. o 0 o N M Y U r O Ooo 0 0 o e e Z Q r O 000 O O O e O Q r n o o n Itl M e Ifl n m r r � r O VMO O O e O O r K W i r f i r N H W W i N NNN N N N N N e OOO O O O O O U r W r \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ W r f P PPP P P P P P 2 r Q IO 000 O "O O O O 0 000 o O o 0 0 .a .r .r J m Q } O O r Q •Z r a a M r z Z r W r V MVP v b N P V p r W r P bbm .a m M1 m P o rxor v vvv in v v v v U r U2 r o 000 0 0 0 0 0 U r� O 000 O O O O O Q r O O O00 O O O O O r > r r W r r U Y M J > a W w > z a o > N M1 J Ur Q Z Z F H O w W W M U Y w Z Z W F W W W Q O Q O J Q W Z N W 6' v Z r owl ti > W O H d' r i l Q a LL Z U' N O Y rXQ r Q O N 0 z Z Z r W Z I U Z U W H Q r > I Q M Jm r r W G N Z X f9 C UO r r H J O S W 0 S > N O FLL r NJZ r C Ln m N 0 H M \bMM r r W o O P O W 0 v v m N N m X W- Z No W Z r o (9Q3 r w J r > o• W=LLO r M v Ifl b M1 m P 2•000 r b b b b b b b QW r Y v v v a v v v >r U wo n n M1 M1' n n r W Hz r W O r P P P P P P P zo m - xz r a aUc�m U r amiffelf o N b b r o o r o P o N M I V a 1 o I UO I v M o N o P v v m W N K I u 1- 0 I N M N 0 W LL L I N on 1 OZ W f W 1' ao a Ww 1z zz z.+1 z lorl Z I L W I 0 I aN I bb bb QNb"=MNM Oo oO mNv O00 mmNOVPNPP NI[10 r•IP 00 NN O \ 1 mm vv ONPMomNI[1 Oo 00 .aNv rOr OPm�}N.n I-Io.amN r.IP �}�f o0 u I W U I . . u I UN I '1 .I 00 QONVNVMw oo bb w"O vm[ �}MN�t ol(IN PIf1MmOmr Q I Zlr 1 vv MM rlm NbVbmm 0o NN bM0 vl[1P MPbrO OP r01[1Mv vv mm I Fq I NN MM n+�t bblllw PP MM .+ MM.+bP .+O N e rr 1 fLL I mm .+ bN I H O I N N 1 L W CW I W I 2 I .-1 O NNvNNN O O MM �}�T .I .1 .y r1 .�'1P r•Ib Ne-1M.I .-I O 0 o NNMo.noN I-1 v .+.+ MM ooOoou11t1bbb01l1b o N .O M NN000eN N N .I .I bb 'I 'IN ti eeeeelr00 r4 K W Q MM�}�t b'�1M M v vv MM vet �t �f vet v�vvvvv 1[1 v W M m m w m M N N M N N P .'•I 'I '1 .•I M I-1 .r .I .+ M I(1 L 1 Z I c O I CI[ cItlNN b N N W N N N N NI -I 1[1N WNwNWNW b 1 0 I �} N �tvvvvvv v v vv b'It v 2 1 O'I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 u 1 M O MMWOW1f N �} N y vv1[1mvgwNIf11f1 NIf11f1 N N Y V I O O OOOOOom 0 o M0 mW W 010 OO0000000 O O Z Q 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O Ow=O O O O O O O O O O O Q I 1 .+ o .-I 'IM MMMM b I[1 1[1M If11f1 NY11[INMMMMMMMMM b �} m r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I m I 1 N 'I '1 'I 'I '1 'I 'I ^I �1 ^I 14 •1 rl rl rl rl rl rl .y .-1 M N'1 ti'1 ^I 'I M �-1 W H N M W 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 I O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W 1 f N W w O W W W w W W to w W W W It11I11111f11t11t11t11t11f11t11f11f11f1 If1 Ifl x I Q 1 0 0 0 o O o o O o o O On MON I'll 0 o O o o e o 0 0 e 0 0 0 O O 0 0 oe00000 0 0 00 oe o00000000000o O O W .•I .1 .-I .r .1 .9 M .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .-1 .1 .1 .1 rl .1 .1 '1.r .-I .O .1 rl .r .y .� ."I J m Q I y I O O I Q •= 1 a a m I 2 - I K m r rrrrr.- rrrrr.. .+.•1 ...+.+.+.. .. .. .t rrrrrmw 0 0 rw 0w rrrrmmmmmmmmm m r O 12 0 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v u Iuz1 0 0 0000000 0 0 00 00 oe0000eoeeeee o 0 u 1� o 0 00000eo e e o0 00 0000000000000 0 0 Q 1 0 e e e e 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1> I O f M K I -I W Q O M Z W Z I 1 a rr > 2 O W f a Q W S Q Q U W U J Z F K W Q J Q W Z Q 1 L 0 2 I O W C I g L l m Q Q Q O N O Y I Z Q I Q W J 2 1 Y J u .1 LL Z I W ZI 1-I S J U K L W Q 2 M Q I> J W W Q O F O J .1 Jm I J Q z H m U x W z W fa,) 0 1 m f9 Q L u m Q d S x u 1 Q H O K N Q K L O W N • K I u u u z m as O NJZ r v o \b1-IN I K v r b O P M N b m IT q'�tOJ I O M b N .+ r .•I b N \L WIZZI o c763 1 W 1 rl J I > 1 .w LLLO I I v O b r m P O .-1 N M .1' Q O O •QC I Y 1 M M M M M M M M M M wof -Z I U 1 r r r r r r r r r r w O H Z I W 0 1 P P P P P P P P P P aaUmm l u=: + 081 O N N b Ill m P .1 e P b O N N M UQI I W H 1 N b v r .•I n .-� M m b P Ill n �t v 0 1 z0 1 N M P N W N C I U f I '1 'I .n m N Ill m N b r m O o U W 1 d E I W •+ M N N on N m m Oz 1 M Cr wC LLo a IZI Z zW 1• I M I I -I 1� 6 1 .w a • x r� x � � x a r • x o 1 z W p 1 ¢C I NN Obb m111 oe mbv Ill 111 mm obP-IMP .1 .1 .•IPe PP bOb 00 N N O I \ 1 mm M..n vet MM OM bulb.+ bb vvM PP P. M 00 m m U WUI . - U I UN 1 NN Obb �S� rr V'n.. nr .1 .+ Ill.-INnbM mm mrb PP Oft I[1 nn �t v Q 1 $f1 I NN NrIM PP NN vvP PP PP �T IllNono nr r.yP nn N.IM oo m m I Fp I .I .-1 .r .y .-I .� bNm NN Il11ll N .•IM m NN N�}b rr mm O o I Y LL 1 W W .+.+ M M N N MOI NN m m I= W 1 CW I ZI N Ill .•I N O O .1 M o 0 0 o P P NN N Ill 111 r 00 O O MMMMI/l .•I bN N NN �1 I I I I 1 I rl O b .+ b n Ill b O .+ .1 .+ .+ M N M .+ .•1 .+ .•I r-1 C v M Ill I[1 Ill cm Ill W m I M PP N PNmmm Ilt N{[l W J J Z Y Z I N N NN NN .•I N N oo N N .+ .•IN NIll ill N NN N N .1 .+ti o 6 Q > > I v %Tv b' v Z 01 I 11 1 I111 1 1 0 0 U I o 0o M o 00 O o Nl/l o N .�N F- Y U 1 0 00 o e O O O o =Mm lll lLloo a mm Ill 111 O o0 0 Z I Q I o 0o O O 00 O o 0000o O 00 O oo .1 Y N Q 1 O O O '1 O O O O O IlI Ifl IIIM M O Ill 111 v .Xv P ff Y m II 11 W U m mm .1 m .�.+ m N .•I .1 .1 .1 .+ m .+.+ .r .-1 .1 2 W Y M .1 .1 O .� OO .•I O OOOOO .1 OO O OO Q U 2 m N N N .� N .•I .+ N Ill .I .1 .a .1 .1 N .+.+ .I .-1 .1 N \ U Y \ C w Q Y m Z N Q m W N NN N N NN N N NNNNN N NN N NN N J O 00 O O 00 O O 00000 O 00 O 00 m O Q Y N NN N N NN N N NNNNN N NN N NN N U I W \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ W 1 f 1 W Ill a Ill Ill N W W N N N W W Ill W VIM W W W N 2 I Q 1 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00000 O o0 0 00 0 U I p \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 0 00 0 0 00 o e ee000 0 00 0 0o e J 1 1 m 1 a Y .00. a •z I .a a N f nnnn .+ W . r rm r 0 rr m n nrrnm m nn r rr m 0 1 v vv IT vv v v vvv vv v vv v vv v U I 1 uz 0 00 O 0 00 0 o Op000 0 00 0 0o e U I o 00 0 0 00 0 0 00000 0 00 0 0o e ¢ No I o eo 0 0 0o O o 00000 0 0o O o0 0 U Z O C Q Y LL o a w H W U O C C N z O N LL U f LL Q W W Q f f U Y W N UI Q Y z N J Z z U M I 1 m 2 Q 6 m Q C N Q a 2 z C H Q W W /:J O z z W Q r•1 O l9 N Q 1 Fi z W C M 1 C U m Z z C C J z C p o I O W 1 z z W N r1 Q W (D Q Q O Ir W C I p= 1 a r p F- 0 z w u u U 3 a Ill OY I ZQ 1 (g W f p C f .•I LL Z I W Z 1 J W C. N 6 Z Z 2 Z 2 1-1 Q I> J J J Q W 3 Ir O O O O Q .I Jm 1 W J Y J N N N N C w rc z z a w o .. o Uo X w3 ¢ ¢ a = U C C W C z (J I W Q O LL H F ny Y W W W W Q N C 1 z a a m N N f F > > > > N aQl 0 fLL 1 NJ2 I v P M m P m b o b O m Ill m \b1-IN I C Ill O n b o M Ill N Ill P b Ill P �tQDJ 1 0 1 P IB N w P P r P N P n NX W I Z. =043 1 W 1 WZLLo 1 W W b r m P e .r N M C Q O O 1 Ill !n Ill Ill Ill N b b b b b b b QC I Y M M M M M M M M M M M M M l u r r n r r r r n n r r r r woD -Z P P P P P P P P P P P P P ww.4.=Z; jA R(/� oVL aaumlu 1 .110O \ I YJ I o m o w P b o m o N o M u Q r b m O 1 MID I O 1� N 1� w P N M m M P UINW IU~I. •~'. v- O .+ f� w M w w w a m v IL S mm i OZ M w I- W R' II ao a W I z W Iz" m l z w1 Z I zWI q I Qp: I 00 PP Oo mf�Nf�a0m PEOPm 00 mom 00 O I \ I e e mm 0 0 O O O O P P P m w N P C0 P b b 0 m0 = 0 O o N o N 0 0 U W U I U 1 UN I bb mm mm timOO�mwMw ITPMI� 1}�} mMOmwwNmbwM 00 ONN PP b' Q 12w I 00 rr NN OmNwI�NN�T I� mww PP �mN NV �Ta N .I ATM mm oMM PP Fq I ww VAT ATM wbMO w fir w v MN ATM ww w w ww I fLL I N �t Mw wf� I w O I I S W I dW f I Z I v I � I I I I I O O w bbbbbbPb MMM ww w�T f�N�TMmw M ww w O IC O ww.•1 .1 .M w.4O w.yw O 00 OOOmmbbO O 00 O I I I I I I 1 I r 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 11 1 I I I 1 P M w .ywwwr•Iw.•IO w.1 n1 .4 ww w.1 r-10 OOO.Y M w.-1 ' W i v v m Q�Tvv�t �tvV v�T �t m mm 1! a 1T v 1T1 � 1T m mm m m !- I P -.I - m N N N N N N w w N P w w M M N w w w w w w w m M M b S ZI e w N NNNNNNMm IN m .+ ww NMMmmmmm N bb N 2 O I I I I I UI O O b mmmmmmvm mm�T .+ NN mV�Tmmmmb b NN b Y U I O O m m m m m m m e e m 0 0 O o o m O e e e e e e m O e O Z a I O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O mm O O O O O O O O O O Q 0 O m mmmmmmf�M mmM m m r 1 1 I 1 I I r I 1 1 I .1.i2=4=,.yNw 2 =2 .i Y 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O m 1 M m ."1 ."1w.•I .•I .•lw ww wlYw M .i .4 ww.4wwMMw ri ^Iw .y W r N (9 W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U I W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W I f I m O ON tOmmCOmOmm mmm m MN EDi0E0EDtDNN m mm 40 2 I Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N u IQ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\ \\\\\\\\ \ \\ \ P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P W O O o O O mm O O O O .0 O a O O O O o 0 0 0 0 o a O O O J m Q Y I O O I 6 •Z I a .LL I N H I I 2 I w I m m O w w w w w w N M w w w m m m m m m m m m m m m n r m 0 I W I N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m MIA m O I 2 O I P IT V �T V �T �f �T �T �T �T �? �T V �T IT � � W V 4 V W IT IT �T � V IT u I u Z I O o 0 0 o e o e e e e e e e a O e O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u I "> I K O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O a IQ I a o 0 ooe00000 ooe o 00 00000000 0 00 0 I> o z z LL G 0 O w M N w 2 W w Z w H w a' O q Q a Q f w u a t z u 3 o O S J w N N Y W Y O w W 2 K N a Q Q H J f K D Z J W 0 Z w J w w N 1• Q S m w I y I > Y W 0.' Z W 2 I O W I O Z 2 w O J N 0 I O S I J Q Q 2 w w b OYIZQI 0 J 1 D N J F J M LL Z I W Z I N M J S J Q a Z Q wI> I W W O - X m 'w Z O 2 P Jm w w I a 2 u m W O Q I 0.z w O Q U U W 2 w u0 I J Q m LL 2 H UI I Q < w < z O W N S O Q N •K I u u U U f9 2 2 w w -� Z .. as I O fLL I NJZ M w m m \bV 10 M N P b M N N =�t b M m w J I O w (� N w b N" a N O J I NM W I z I P DQ31w I O J I > I w .. III WSLLo I w N M IT m K QOO I v I N N N N N N N N N M M Qy w o Y Y I w W O f Z I W O I P P P P P P P P P P P Mum I SZ I 083. a aum I u I .'� N M O r ON I o m N o P P i0 o r N o O P P M I U.C. mIl1 W F I o r SO I b b N m b b M H b n m N N W N W I U H I b V' p I[1 M 'I H N M M a W a m v N M b y a s b b oz I H � WW ao a W IZ zOC I IzH I 1 7 Q r x IF .t r MI s w a Y ,t t M H I OI Z I S W W I O mm NN Oo PP Pp mm If ti i o �?I oo � P P O \ I Oo nr �t �t Oo 0o vet bb MbONwvv PN �t NMpm Oo �t v �t 0 O u wu1 U I UN v mm IfIW wo eltl mm NNmNVr HM. .� .v bb WO N N Q I ZH I bb bb NN mm bb bb Nm�tV�tM VV" .+M'Ib rn mm N N I Fq I bb �t �t PP HN N bbM MN M M I HO r �v NN r-IHM b b b b I W I I W W W I ZI iI Oo NMN m H O O O O M O O Nb1f1OO 00 M�N O I W m O O M H .rMMHH m �T�1 1[1 c MVMm .+ N Q N N N 4 n N %T�t WMM MNI = I Z r m N Io H o �-r N O e0 1H4 � I I fl W v � �t �t �t �t �1[1 �t Z I O I I I I I I O O U I r O o N O N o b�t00 Now N b !- Y- Y U I b O o o O o 0 O00 00o O I[1 Z Q I m o 0 o O o 0 0mmmmo O0 Oo 00o O o Y M Q H o o P O 1[1 o MmMrr Oo MON I7 1I1 U Y m r I I I W U •+ N n .1 ..I HI -I .1 H.1 H.� .r .rH .1 .q 2 W Y o o O H o o e OOOOo 00 0OO o o U S m r V .r Ifl �t N .�I H H H .+.-r H ^I'1 H I[1 .+ Y \ Z Z m W Q Y � m Z m a H pq U W N N N N N N N NNNNN NN NNN N N J O O O O O O O 00000 00 000 O O Q Y N N N N N N N NNNNN NN NNN N N U I W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\ \\\ \ \ W mmm m m S I Q N N N N N N N NNNNN NN NNN N N P P P P P P P PpPPP PP PPp P P W O o e O o 0 0 0000o e0 OOo 0 0 J m I a I Y pool Q r •2 I a ra I y I z a n H n N. r m m OHHHH mm mmm n m 0 I W Ifl W W N O O N Ifl lfl l[l N N W W W W W rt1 W U I UZ I e e o 0 0 o e mmmmm eO oO0 o e mmmm 0 00 000 O O a r 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o0000 oe 000 0 0 C 2 6 O I W Q K H U H C Z J W W O O Q m I Z U U W W Q W q q Z S R' W 0. Q Q Y N U U W Y Z J O 2 Z W f Q m W 0' F 0 Z q Z m Q S 0- W x S J Q > > U W LL U L U 0 W O M Z Y > H s f F m H I U Z Y. Q CD W J > O a O H Z I o W I H W m 0 Y a W U 3 2 I q2 I W Z m W W N Q U W b O Y I Z Q I p q K H Z 3 m 0 w M LL Z I W 2 1 H K Q 2 W Z W Y. M Y H Q I> N Q 3 J q O Z Q W Q UO I > Q Z 0 O 3 Q Z W H W m J K O R' H a H O N •d' I C N H H H H > > > 3 3 3 Q a I o LL I N Jz r b b b o .n M o N o M b \bHM I y r V o W n N M b p �f n Ifl P n o Na J . 0 m o N b b N n n n I q0 I b b V 'I N .+ b \s wlzzl P fAQ3 I W I o J I > w W SLLo I QyI Y M M M M M M M M M M M M dOYY I (y n n r r r n n n n n n n W O H Z I W O I p P P P P P P P P P P P szI=Z aaUmI u I 084 I CIT SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Request by the County of Riverside Planning Commission to Utilize the Council Chambers for Public Hearings February 27, June 26 and October 23, 2013, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: do STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve request by the County of Riverside Planning Commission to utilize the Council Chambers for Public Hearings February 27, June 26 and October 23, 2013, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of La Quinta periodically receives requests from other governmental agencies to utilize the Council Chamber. An application must be submitted to the City Manager's Office at least three calendar weeks prior to the scheduled event(s). FISCAL IMPACT: In accordance with the Guidelines for Use of Civic Center Facility, deposits and fees are waived for governmental agencies. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The County of Riverside Planning Commission has requested that the Council Chambers be made available for public hearings on the following days in 2013: February 27, June 26 and October 23. The request meets all the requirements of the facility use as contained in the City's Guidelines for Use of Civic Center Facility. A complete application has been submitted (Attachment 1) for the City Council's consideration. 085 ALTERNATIVE: Council may elected not to allow the use of the Council Chambers by the Riverside County Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, Wanda Wise -Latta, xecutive Assistant Attachment: 1. Application 086 ATTACHMENT 1 I, Organization: County of Riverside Plantling connnistsin. Persoa(s) In• Charges Mary Stark Phone: (951) 955-7436 Address:4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside CA 92501 .Facility. Requested: City Council Chambers Type of Event: Public Hearing Private Description of Activity: Plan"Ing Commission Hearings Date(s) of Vast 02-27-13, 06-26-1 6 A. Sire of Group: 50-100 13=E3-13 . Time of Uses Start (a.m./ ) '8:00 Finish ( ./p.m.) 5:00 Total Hours of age x $32.00 /hour — Certificate of Additional Insured Attached: 7 -equ or - City Iaauzance Requested: Fee Paids Refundable Cleaning Deposit Paids Session Roca we $200 ` Council Chambers (up to 53 people) we $300 Council Chambers (54 people plus) . $500 Total Paids The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by the lea and regulations Of the City of La Quiata relating to the use f pub is facilities. Dates � signatur Titles. TLMA Commission SecretarX Deposit Required Fors WA Deposit Returned: Dates..N/� ItDTB : Ths Peaen signing the cppliostien ama the etetuomt of imtoraseion ssuet he sn -:floor of the �ponterl-g aegsnisation. it the gotten is not at-fficer of the orgaailatiea ter which app Lieation is xsee, he/she must pruont written Authorisation cross the group to alga.• 087 cF'y UZ OF 0 SVHVFA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Receive and File Transmittal of Treasurer's Reports as of August 31, 2012 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: n_ CONSENT CALENDAR: "t STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1 /1 /86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Money and Funds. I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet next month's estimated expenditures. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANAYLS I S : Receive and File Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated August 31, 2012 for the City of La Quinta. ALTERNATIVES: None. Respectfully submitted: & fin) Robbeyn tird, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report, City of La Quinta 089 2 ATTACHMENT IO � MEMORANDUM luinta City Council FROM: Robbeyn Bird, Finance Direct0r/Treasurer SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for August 31, 2012 DATE: September 30, 2012 Attached is the Treasurer's Report for the month ending Augst 31, 2012. The report is submitted to the City Council each month after a reconciliation of accounts is accomplished by the Finance Department. The following table summarizes the changes in investment types for the month: ' treat bearing active 37,144,005 39,975,73515,632tificates $ 2,500:000 $ (21,875.000) 0 $ 17,769,005 of Deposit724,000 240,002 $ (50,000) 0 39,941,367 jdeposit Treasuries72,981.334 GovY Sponsored En8,999.015 3.200,000 (484,000) (5,200,000) 4,984 480,000 70,986,318 Imercial Paper11,998,605 3orate Notes 5.000,000 (15,000,000) 694 3,000,420 8,999,709 uaI Funds16,025,086 4,999,025 a 771 ,�,.. ___. 0 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in conformity with the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank Monthly Statement and the Bank of New York Monthly Custodian Report to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. - Finance Director/Treasurer Date Footnote (1) The amount reported represents the net increase (decrease) of deposits and withdrawals from the previous month. (2) The amount reported in the other column represents the amortization of premium/discount for the month on US Treasury, Commercial Paper and Agency investments. (3) The cash account may reflect a negative balance. This negative balance will be offset with transfers from other investments before warrants are presented for payment by the payee at the bank. 694 �90 3 Treasurer's Commentary For the Month of August 2012 Cash Balances — The portfolio size decreased by $27.90 million to end the month at $159.43 million. The major reason for the decrease was due to payments of $25.3 million for the Coral Mountain Apartment project and $370,000 for the Torre Nissan agreement. Investment Activity — The investment activity resulted in an average maturity decrease of three (3) days from the prior month to end the month of August at 31 days. The Treasurer follows a buy and hold investment policy with three (3) Commercial Paper investments maturing and one (1) purchase during the month of August. There was also one (1) Certificate of Deposit that matured for $244,000. and one (1) rollover of $240,000 made. The sweep account earned $25 in interest income for the month of August and the bank fees for the month were $ 1,648 which resulted in a net decrease of $1,623 in real savings. Portfolio Performance — The overall portfolio performance decreased two (2) basis points from the prior month and ended at .29% for the month, with the 'pooled cash investments at .41 %. The portfolio yield should continue to stay at these levels for the near future. At this time last year, the portfolio was yielding .38% which reflects the current interest rate environment. Looking Ahead In the short term, the Treasurer will be investing in short term commercial paper or GSE paper and rolling over bond proceeds and reserves in U.S. Treasury bills or notes. r,91 4 m z Z a� m 'm N a7 0 C 0 N o EEEEEEE EON °c 8a 000000 o$ o a bE oo_ $ c Soo w aR $ $$g o ry o y � O • N M 0 O < M O M N x p O o $ $ pp$ cs ILOH m 0100SNYff.O12 �`.�RiNEE " g $0 O O O MOO M m M de Cl m $ a os ss s amaR §E M M oM M M$o Oo 00 00 0 C1N NC 'N 00 NO$ IV GOOD 'NRl . S mp O S O E a W S x o E .E .� E 6 m m Wm& Z y q G sLLC pE s8 N > YI O 9 C H y 'm W IZL p 5 O m m C e�- 10 2 $ o-' sa E H B a w�3 S Sao 8aJ2 i m E E Sgg m 5 2 `o y Paz x X— _ Wm 2.2 E 8 8 S ❑ @E E $ E �yy 3 ❑ m �`XU ?€ $E m U ` S o mEc EEE ggm i o mm W m E € Ti UM Im F $ c 2 i 8 m y E a E u E m� V E a � a a n U U m U9 o LLLL(LLL am � b S � �WQ c mac' 092 5 2 gGgG�gg�gg� §§§, |!§§§§..6d.6 AIR | RR #§!e n&J Q o93 m miles,,•,-, ./®®44 « !, �|}| r! \ if jJgR/9 § ■ #| � » , [ E 094 e e e e 06 0a O O e ee eee ee N N N O O O O P O O O N m C! O W N O -O O OO O OO O OO N N O O O N N N ry N N N N OO (�NVTI m O= m O a n m W W�W g 0 p m adm �mm mm � oim adm � q 00 00 0 O O 0 p m O p n O O pNj pN 000 000 00 000 00 0000 00 y O O O l� p p P mP N Om 0 0 0 O ma O 0 0 6 O 00 O O 0000 O O O O p mmN n n A m 0 C (Om O N N �pj y 0O m0m O 00 0000 0 O p PP On00 h O - � N a Cj h nj O = N O h � m O N N d E g d c 0 ~LDm 01 E r c �; A E a rrr aaa c m m 2 Ff-.E a m q EEm mew E E E ggg8 m @ a W W J E o U J m ¢ 5 .m WWW E E E 00 O O O E'Sm N C a� m U N m »> UUU UU WWWW $ c e m y m c m U _ O Q m y 4 i Lk � J L U O a C $q tLj mWn IE OOSNa m p�pO N E N q d m L O C 2`o ezl� L rl UJq Wm U9$i Q CCmZ fF m IL a. C m WLL$ — LL O J_mE F 095 n i � 3 �SR S 8�� � €� s 9 ■"w !! �! / 22:�#■ § \ $,. VA ! �! ee 7� . ƒilk { \ �a ! :, `„ ! ,f, , • . §#- ! a I t � 097 a City of La puinta Comparative Rates of interest August 31, 2012 City of La Cu' to FY OB'O9 July Z008 2.09%�•• 1.03% weran 2.77% MaWA ea Three Monty Si4 Monty _vtia Dire Year Tvv Year TOree Monty Au9ust2008 3.18X 1.92% 2.88% 82 il0% 1.88% 2.2g% 2.76% Non- Fnamial WFRa 9ep12008 2.81% 1.92% 2.64% 51 37 1'B 7'8 2. 14% 2.38% 2.18% 2.70% Op 2008 2.86% 2.81% 2.81% 29 1'�X 1.79% 1.96% 2.00% 2.08% 2,78% Nov Z008 2.38% 2.36% 2.36% 0.80% 1./O% 1.72% 1.50% 2,13% 2,77% Oec 2008 LBO% 0.18% 142X 8/ 118 0.15% 0.49% 1.06% 1.25% 207% 2lt% Jan 2009 138X 0.18% 123X 82 0.05% 0.25% OS9% 0.88% 1.45% 0.97% 2S7% Feb 2009 123% 0.18% 1.11% 75 0.15% 035% 0.43%. 0,88% 0.31% 2.35% Mar 2008 f.26% 0.18% 1,11% 84 0.30% 0.50% O.fit% 0.88% 037% 2,05% AW 2009 0.94X 0.18% 085% 54 0.20% OA2% 0,70% 0.88% 0.37% 187% MaY 2009 0.92X 0.18% 0,84% 80 g31Y 033% 0.59% 0,88% 0.28% 1.g2Y, FYOW70 June 2008 0.85% 029% 0,80% 111 0.18% 0.30% 0.0% 0.88% 028% 1.61% July 2008 0.89% 0.30% O65% 111 0.20% 0.35% 0.55% 1.13% 0.28% L53% August 2009 0.84% 0.30% 0.81% 92 0.19% 0.28% 0.p% 1.00% 0.28% 1.38% Sep12009 0.58% 0.31% 0.53% 112 0.18% 028% 0.48% 1.00% 01 % 1.01% Oq 2009 052% 0.31% 0.50% 80 0.12X 0.19% 0.41% 1.00% 0.19X 093% Nov 2DD9 0.56% 0,31% 0.53% 152 O.OB% 0.111% 0.38% 1.00% 019% 0.75% Dec 2009 0.66% OA5% 0.51% P39 0.0/% 0.14% 0,32% 0.75% 0.15% 0,65% 048% 0.15% 043% 179 0.11% 0.20% 0.76% 1.00% 0.16% 081% Fel,W10 Fe62010 0.51% 0.16% 0.0% 172 0.06% 0.14% 0.3/% 0.88% 0.13% 0,57% Mar2010 0.50% 0.16% 047% 1]2 0.13% 0.19% 0,32% 0.88% 0.75%' O,W% Ap 2010 0.52% 0.16% 048% 162 0.15% 0.24% 0.35% t00% 0.20% O58% Wy2010 0.52X 0.16% 0./8X i16 OA5% 0.24% 0.49X 1.00% 0,23% 0.55% FY 10111 June 2010 July2010 0.41% 008% 0,29% 134 0.1]% 0,16% 0.22% 0.22% 0.37% 0.75% 0.32% 0,56% 05fi% August2010 0.50% 041% 0.15% 0.15% 0.47% 119 0.16% 0.20% 0.32% 0.30% 063% 0.83% 0.28% 053% SaP12070' 0.55% 0.15% 0.48% 0.51% 108 107 0.15% 0.19% 0.26% 0,38% 0,25% 0.25% 0.53% 002010 0.55% 0.15% 0.51X 88 0.10% 0.19% 0.27% 0.38% 0.24% 0M% Nov 2010 0.53% 0.15% 0.49% B4 OA3% OAM 0.23% 0.38% 0.23X 0.50% 0.48% Dec 2010 0.57% 0.14% 0.52% 261 0,18% 0.21% 028% 0.50% 0.23% 0.45% Jan 2011 0.51% 0.14% 0/3% 206 0,15% 0.16% 0,19% 0.30% 0.63% 0.23% 046% Fa92017 0.55% 0.77% 0.48% 210 0.15% 0.18% 0.28% 0,63% 054X Mar 2011 Apr 2011 0.54% 0.17X OAS% 218 0.15% 0.17% 0.13% 0.31% 0.83% 0.23% 0.57% MaY 2011 059% OAB% 0.17% 0,17% 0.48% 192 0.05% 0,10% 0,31% 0.28% 0]5% 0.63% 023% 059% June 2011 0.53% 0.00% 0.41% 0.35% 158 0,06% 0,12% 0.20% 0.50% 020% 0.16% 0.59% F1'i1/12 July 2011 0.53% 0.00% 0.35% 113 0.03% 0.f0% 020% 0.38% 0.15% 0.41% 045% August 2011 0.80% 0.00% 0,38% 102 007% 0.02% 0.12% 0,15% 020X 0.14% 0,38% SW 2011 2011 058X 0.03% 0.39% 124 002% 0.05% 006% 0.10% 0.13% OA6% 0.38% N Nev 2011 0.53% 0.52% 0.03% 0.03% 0.35% 117 0.01% 0.06% 009% 0.12% 0,13% 0.25% 0.14% 0.38% Dec 2011 0.48% 0.03% 0.37% 0.35% 86 0.03% om% 0.10% 0.25% 0.15% 0.1d% 0.39% Jan 2012 0.45% 0.03% 0.3/X 74 002% 0.05% 0.06% p.11% 0.73% 0d Fe02012 0.49% 0.05% 0,36% 72 0.12% 0.08% 0.11% US% 0.14% 039% Mar W12 a."% 0.05% 0.34% 94 0.14% 0.1]% 0.25% 0.17% 0.39% Apr2012 0.44% 0,09% 0.35% 81 0.10% Mae 2012 0.W% 0.08% 0.34% 62 0,09% 0.16% 0.19% 025% 020% 03]% FY 12H3 June 2012 July 2012 0.38% 0.41% 0.08% 029% 47 0.10% 0.14% 0.15% 0.79% 021% 025% 0,26% 0.19% 0.37% Au uM 2012 0.41% 0.08% 008% 0.29% 0.29% 112 31 0.10% 0.11% 0,15% nr.- 021% ��.... 0.26% ____. 0.21%- 0.21% 0.36% 0.36% 098 11 N C N e 7 � O � 7 Q C w C N rn Q i U O d) � N tL T 0m 75 ms c � w i � � L N C f6 O 7 O Q !A C y C N 41 C (n � L C (6 E U y o c 0 0 0 N N y Z c m Z N — n I O Q m co to N W W .�.� to O Q N t N Q Q H Co N = V ■ C Q T w 1 C w Ci to O t N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o 0 0 0 O i0 O t0 O LO O TO O O ` to IRS,� IT(h CV)N N 2 S � q O ,t C O O O O O O 00 O O O O G a 0 4 1 I ■ i 1 4 i ■ i t � / I ■ 1 i q ■ 11� 99 12 04 ZP 4"INAL cFM OF'tK4'� AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY A/HA/FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 BUSINESS SESSION: _ ITEM TITLE: Receive and File Transmittal of Revenue CONSENT CALENDAR: 0 and Expenditure Report dated August 31, 2012 and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending STUDY SESSION: September 30, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Monthly and year-to-date revenues and expenditures of the City of La Quinta and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2012. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Receive and File Transmittal of the August 31, 2012 Statements of Revenue and Expenditures for the City of La Quinta and Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2012. ALTERNATIVES: None. Respectfully submitted: Robbeyn Mrd, Finance Director Attachments: 1. Revenue and Expenditures Report for August 31, 2012 2. Investment Summary Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2012 100 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA REVENUES -ALL FUNDS 07MI12012 - 08/3112012 FUNDS ADJUSTED BUDGET RECEIVED REMAINING BUDGET % RECEIVED General $33,053,355.00 $522,548.31 $32,530,806.69 1.60% Library 2,049,957.00 '0.00 2,049,957.00 0.00% Gas Tax Revenue 994,900.00 114.706.80 860,193.20 11.50% Federal Assistance 300,350.00 0.00 300,350.00 0.00% JAG Grant 1,403.00 0.00 1.403.00 0.00% Slesf (Cops) Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Indian Gaming 105,844.00 0.00 105,844.00 0.00% Lighting & Landscaping 960,000.00 0.00 960,000.00 0.00% RCTC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Development Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Crime Violent Task Force 230,347.00 9,984.00 220,363.00 4.30% Asset Forfeiture 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% AS 939 4,300.00 0.00 4,300.00 0.00% Quimby 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00% Infrastructure 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00% Proposition lB 287,307,00 0.00 287,307.00 0.00% South Coast Air Quality 417,100.00 11,718.03 405,381.97 2.80% CMAQ/ISTEA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Transportation 523,300.00 122,160.00 401,140.00 23.30% Parks & Recreation 89,200.00 18.633.00 70,567.00 20.90% Civic Center 127,600.00 21,480.00 106,120.00 16.80% Library Development 35,500.00 4,071.00 31,429.00 11.50% Community Center 13,400.00 1,158.00 12,242.00 8.60% Street Facility 20,000.00 5.192.00 14,808.00 26.00% Park Facility 2,200.00 525.00 1,675.00 23.90% Fire Protection Facility 29,800.00 10,850.00 18,950.00 36.40% Arts In Public Places 99,800.00 34,006.32 65,793.68 34.10% Interest Allocation 0.00 (3,033.39) 3,033.39 0.00% Capital Improvement 102,353,262.00 25,334,310.83 77,018.951.17 24.80% Equipment Replacement 592,124.00 97.470.54 494,653.46 16.50% Information Technology 495,781.00 81.930.00 413,851.00 16.50% Park Equipment & Facility 512,223.00 83,753.84 428,469.16 16.40% SilverRock Golf 4,042,917.00 277,544.03 3,765,372.97 6.90% SilverRock Golf Reserve 69,215.00 - 0.00 69,215.00 0.00% La Quints Public Safety Officer 2,100.00 2,000.00 100.00 95.20% Supplemental Pension Savings Plan 900.00 0.00 900.00 0.00% Measure"A" 412,500.00 0.00 412,500.00 0.00% La Quinta Financing Authority 678,130.00 0.00 678,130.00 0.00% Successor Agency 1.063.271.00 0.00 1,063,271.00 0.00% Successor Agency to RDA Project Area No. 1 16,526.862.00 6.261.70 16,520,600.30 0.00% Successor Agency to RDA Project Area No.2 3,627,301,00 1,036.00 3,626,265.00 0.00% inta Housing Authority 193692,9.3 0 $1, $18094,795. ,,187 $i42514 52 70&_5011TLQ 23.0% % 101 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS FUNDS 0.1U E 07/012012-0 /201 EMAI I Gene BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENT Library $35, 2320.00 ,041, 2. 2 10,8 .7 ,550, 33.03 .7% Gas Tax 1.917,877.00 419,816.00 0.00 1.498,061.00 21.9% Federal Assistance 994.900.00 298,413.OD 165,816.OD 720.64 0.00 0.00 829,084.00 16.7% JAG Gent 1.402.00 0.00 0.00 297,892.36 1,402.00 0.2% 0.0% Sleet (Cops) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% Indian Gaming Indian Gaming Lighting 8 Landscaping 118,308.00 960,000.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.00 O.OD 118,308.00 800,000.00 0.0% RCTC Development Agreement 0.00 ODD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.7% 0.0% CV Violent Crime Task Form 68,490.00 13.674.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.815.29 0.0% 20.0% AS 939 Quimby 307,999.00 12,272.00 2,000.0D 293,727.00 4.0% Infrastructure 9,198,032.00 242.074.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,198,032.00 0.0% Proposition I 287,307.00 21,748.75 0.00 0.00 242.074.00 265,558.25 0.0% 7.6% South Coast Air Quality CMAQ 415,700.00 0.00 0.00 415,700.00 0.0% Transportation 0.00 2,766,145.00 0.00 (23.241.52) ODD 0.00 0.00 2,789,386.52 0.0% -0.8% Parks & Recreation 8,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.0% Civic Center Library Development 236,939.00 9,400.00 33,656.00 0.00 0,00 203.283.00 14.2% Community Center 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,400.00 0.00 0.0% Sheet Facility Park Facility 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.0% 0.0% Fire Protection 4,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.200.00 4,700.00 0.0% 0.0% Arts In Public Places Interest Allocation 536,200.00 16.16 0.00 536,163.84 0.0% Capital Improvement 0.00 102,353,262.00 0.00 25,334,310.83 O.OD 0.00 0.00 77.018,951.17 0.0% 24.8% Equipment Replacement 582,217.00 36,837.51 0.00 545,379.49 6.3% Information Technology 547.849.00 92,432.22 0.00 455,416.78 16.9% Park Maintenance Facility 552,523.00 0.00 O.OD 562,523.00 0.0% SilverRock Goff SllverRock Reserve 3,888,038.00 456,899.53 0.00 3,431,138.47 11.8% LQ Public Safely Officer 0.00 2.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.0% 0.0% Supplemental Pension Savings Plan 12,833.00 12,832.86 0.00 0.14 100.0% Measure "A" Le Qulnta Financing Authority 412.500.00 678,130.00 68,750.00 0.00 ODD 343,750.00 16.7% La Quints Housing Authority 26,181,020.00 25,431.378.13 0.00 0.00 678.130.00 749,641.87 0.0% 97.1% Successor Agency 6,317,655.00 81,014.00 0.00 6,236.641.00 1.3% Successor Agency to Project Area No. 1 55,937,288.00 4.612.534.75 0.00 51,324,753.25 8.2% Successor Agency to Project Area No. 2 23,198,666.00 13,699,SD9.03 0.00 9,499,056.97 59.1% 0 102 a CITY OF LA OUINTA GENERAL FUND REVENUES DETAIL 07/0112012.0813112012 TAXES: Property Tax No Lox Property Tax Distribution Non -RDA Property tax Statutory Tax - LO Statutory Tax - Riverside Cnty Sales Tax Sales Tax Reimbursement Document Transfer Tax Transient Occupancy Tax Transient Occupancy Tax - Mitigation Measures Franchise Tax TOTAL TAXES LICENSE & PERMITS: Business License Animal License Building Permits Plumbing Permits Mechanical Permits Electrical Permits Garage Sale Permits Misc. Permits TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS FEES: Sale of Maps & Publications Community Services Fees Finance Bldg & Safety Fees Bldg & Safety Lease Revenue SMIP Administration Fees Planning Fees Public Works Fees TOTALFEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL - Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Motor Vehicle Code Fines Parking Violations Misc. Fines Federal Govt Grants County of Riverside Grant State of California Grant Fire Services Credit- Capital (10150003375010) FireServices Credit-Oper (10150003375000) CVWD CSA152 Assessment TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTEREST MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Revenue AB939 Mitigation Measures Rental income Advertising Coop Cash Over/(Short), TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND ADJUSTED REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 1,764,800.00 0.00 1,764,800.00 0.000% 3,922,500.00 0.00 3,922,500.00 0.000% 366,000.00 0.00 366,000.00 0.000% 190,000.00 0.00 190,000.00 0.000% 80,000.00 0.00 80,000.00 0.000% 5,987,250.00 0.00 5,987,250.00 0.000% 1,995,750.00 0.00 1,995,750.00 0.000% 441,500.00 48,455.94 393,044.06 10.980% 4,800,000.00 58,460.48 4,741,519.54 1.220% 251,000.00 3,336.53 247,663.47 - 1,330%- 1,457,730.00 30,307.06 1427422.94 2,080% 21,256.530.00 140,579.99 21,115,950.01 0,660% 298,400.00 51,69&50 246,701.50 17.330% 32,300.00 4,901.50 27,398.50 15.170% 188,300.00 41,691.00 148,709.00 22.090% 24,400.00 6,126.00 18,274.00 25.110% 24,800.00 6,645.00 18,155.00 26.790% 25,200.00 5,229.64 19,970.36 20.750% 16,100.00 2,190.00 13,910.00 13.600% 39,900.00 7,211.36 32.688.64 18.070% 649,400.00 125,593.00 523,807.00 19.340% 1,885.00 92.70 1,792.30 4.920% 427,394.00 163,202.45 264,191.55 38.190% 7,800.00 90.00 7,710.00 1.150% 312,588.00 38,806.95 273,781.05 12.410% 73,100.00 12,730.80 60,369.20 17.420% 250.00 0.00 250.00 0.000% 89,522.00 7,88&08 81,636.92 8.810% 320,955.00 7,181.00 313774.00 2.240% 1,233,494.00 229,988.98 1,003,505.02 18.850% 3,315,000.00 0.00 3,315,000.00 0.000% 112,900.00 5,840.34 107,059.66 5.170% 42,900.00 5,047.66 37,852.34 11.770% 152,900.00 9,815.39 143,084.61 6.420% 12,900.00 0.00 12,900.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 5,207.00 0.00 5,207.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 5,248,914.00 0.00 5,248,914.00 0.000% 16,800.00 0.00 18,800.00 0.000% 253,000.00 0.00 253,000.00 0.000% 9,160,521.00 20,703.39 9,139,817.61 0.230% 444,900.00 0.00 444,900.00 0.000% 16,400.00 4,969.95 11,430.05 30.300% 92,400.00 0.00 92,400.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.000% 25,000.00 700.00 24,300.00 2.800% 0.00 13.00 (13.00) 0.000% 158,800.00 5,682.95 153,117.05 3.580% 149,710.00 0.00 149,710.00 0.000% 33,053,355.00 522,548.31 32,530,806.69 1.580% 103 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA / GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT 0710112012. 08/31/2012 ADJUSTED 08131/12 REMAINING BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENTAGE GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE 745,759.00 64,166.87 0.00 681.592.13 8.60% CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 576,536.00 84,479.24 0.00 512,056.78 11.18% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1,149.565.00 239,288.74 0.00 910,276.26 20.82% MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1185277.00 309557.60 0.00 875719.40 26.12% TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3,857,137.00 677,49.45 0.00 2,979,644.55 18.53% CITY CLERK 591032.00 85393.28 0.00 525638.72 11.06% TOTAL CITY CLERK 591,032.00 65,393. 8 0.00 2 ,838.72 11.06% COMMUNITY SERVICES - FINANCE: BUILDING & SAFETY: POLICE: PARKS & RECREATION ADMINIS 990,978.00 SENIOR CENTER 414,564.00 PARKS & RECREATION PROGRA 197,734.00 LIBRARY 1,426,558.00 PARK MAINTENANCE 1,587,298.00 MUSEUM 270,040.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 4.887.172.W 119,862.00 0.00 871,116.00 12.10% 52,347.17 0.00 362,216.83 12.63% 28,849A4 0.00 168.884.86 14,59% 197,845.93 0.00 1,228,712.07 13.87% 211,836.94 0.00 1.375,461.06 13,35% FISCAL SERVICES 968,281.00 141,144.43 0.DD 827,136.57 14.58% CENTRAL SERVICES 308,979.00 34613.44 0.00 274365.56 11.20% TOTAL FINANCE 1,277,280.00 175,757.67 0.00 1,101,502.13 13.76% BUILDING&SAFETY -ADMIN 29C BUILDING 544 CODE COMPLIANCE 1,041 ANIMAL CONTROL 454 FIRE 4,98E EMERGENCY SERVICES 217 CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERA 1,234 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY 8.770 0.00 246,407.73 15.12% 0.00 458,730.85 15.T7% 0.00 887,477.82 14.83% 0.00 401,286.91 11.65% 0.00 4,960,835.32 0.52% POLICE SERVICES 12,743,025.00 38,295.17 0.00 12,704,729.83 0.30% TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 12,743,025.00 38,295.17 0.00 12,704, 29.03 0.3D% PLANNING: PLANNING -ADMIN 832,287.00 96,844.09 0.00 735,442.91 11.64% CURRENT PLANNING 666884.01 100584.61 0.00 566299.39 15.08% TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7,4W 00 197428. fU 0.00 1,301,742.30 13.17% PUBLIC WORKS: _ PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIC 527,256.00 73,509.16 0.00 453.746.84 13.94% DEVELOPMENT & TRAFFIC 627,580.00 85,063.35 0.00 542,516.65 13.55% MAINT/OPERATIONS-STREETS 1,472,683.00 203,510.96 0.00 1,269,172.04 13.82% TRANSFERS OUT 2,094,807.00 2,125.00 0.00 2,092.682.00 0.10% GENERAL FUND REIMBURSEMENTS (5,519,072.00) (936,794.00) 0.00 (4,582,278.00) 16.97% NET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 35,602.320.00 2,041,342.22 10,844.75 33,650,13&03 5.73% L 104 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA 0710MO12-08131/2012 ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL ADJUSTED REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED LIBRARY: County of Riverside 2,D43,357.00 0.00 2,043,357.00 0.000% Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 a000% Interest 6,600.00 0.00 6,600.00 0.000% TOTAL LIBRARY 2,049,957.00 0.00 2,049,957.00 0.000% GAS TAX REVENUE: Section 2105 205,200.00 16,258.16 188,941.84 7.920% Section 2106 128,600.00 11,102.34 117,497.66 8.630% Section 2107 - 273.100.00 32,301.08 240,798.92 11.830% Section 2107.5 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.000% Section 2103 381.800.00 55,045.22 326,754.78 14.420% Traffic Congestion Relief 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.000% TOTAL GAS TAX 994.900.00 114.706.80 880.193.20 11.530% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE REVENUE: CDBG Grant 300,350.00 0.00 300,350.00 0.000% Federal Stimulus 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 300,350.00 0.00 300,350.00 0.000% JAG GRANT Grant Revenue 1,403.00 0.00 1,403.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL JAG GRANT 1,403.00 0.00 1,403.00 0,000% SLESF(COPS)REVENUE: SLESF (Cops) Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL SLESF (COPS) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% INDIAN GAMING Grant revenue 105,844.00 0.00 105,844.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INDIAN GAMING 105,844.00 0.00 105,844.00 0.000% LIGHTING S, LANDSCAPING REVENUE: Assessment 960,000.00 0.00 960,000.00 0.000% Developer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIGHTING S LANDSCAPING 960,000.00 0.00 960,000.00 0.000% RCTC ROTC Funding 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL RCTC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND Mitigation Measures 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 105 07/0112012 - 09/31/2012 CITY OF LA QUINTA ADJUSTED REMAINING % ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE Member Contributions - Carryover 29,952.00 9,984.00 19,968.00 33.330% Grant revenue -JABG 198,595.00 0.00 198,595.00 0.000% CLET Line 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 0.000% Interest 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE 230,347.00 9,984.00 220.363.00 4.330% ASSET FORFEITURE Interest - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.000% State Adjudicated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Federal Adjudicated '0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL ASSET FORFEITURE AS 939 REVENUE: AS 939 Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 4,300.00 0.00 4,300.00 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL AS 939 QUIMBY REVENUE: - Quimby Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Donations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.000% TOTAL QUIMBY 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.000% INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE: Utility refund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% PROPOSITION IB - S81266 Prop I Grant 287,307.00 0.00 287,307.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL PROPOSITION 1 B SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY REVENUE: ' S.C.A.Q. Contribution 41,200.00 11,718.03 29,481.97 28,440% MSRC Funding 375,500.00 0.00 375,500.00 0.000% Street Sweeping Grant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 400.00 0.00 400.00 0.000% TOTAL SCAQ 417,100.00 11,718.03 405.381.97 2.810% CMAQnSTEA State Grants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.000% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TRANSPORTATION Developer fees 441,500.00 122,160.00 319,340.00 27.670% Interest 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 0.000% Donations 80,000.00 0.00 00,000.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 523,300.00 122,160.00 401,140.00 23.340% PARKS It RECREATION Developer fees 89,200.00 18,633.00 70,567.00 20.890% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transferin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 89,200.00 18,633.00 70,567.00 20.890% t.' 106 07/0112012.OB/3112012 CITY OF LA OUINTA ADJUSTED REMAINING % ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED CIVIC CENTER Developerfees 127.600.00 21,480.00 106,120.00 16.830% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL CIVIC CENTER 127,600.00 21.480.00 106,120.00- 16.830% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT Developer fees 35,500.00 4,071.00 31,429.00 11.470% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 000 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT 35,500.00 4,071.00 31,429.00 11.470% COMMUNITY CENTER Developer fees 7,400.00 1,158.00 6,242.00 15.650% Interest 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.000% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER 13,400.00 1,158.00 12,242.00 8.640% STREET FACILITY Developer fees 17,800.00 5,192.00 12,608.00 29.170% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Transfer in 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.000% TOTAL STREET FACILITY 20,000.00 5.192.00 14,808.00 25.960% PARK FACILITY Developer fees 2,200.00 525.00 1,675.00 23.860% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL PARK FACILITY 2,200.00 525.00 1,675.00 23.860% FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY Developer fees 29,800.00 10,850.00 18,950.00 36.410% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY 29.800.00 10,850.00 18.950.00 36.410% ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REVENUE: Arts in Public Places 97,500.00 20,006.32 77,493.68 20.520% Arts in Public Places Credits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Insurance Recovedes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Donations 0.00 14,000.00 (14,000.00) 0.000% Interest 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 0,000% TOTAL ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 99.800.00 34.006.32 65,793.68 34.070% INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND: Pooled Cash Allocated Interest 0.00 (3,033.39) 3,033.39 0.000% Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INTEREST ALLOCATION 0.00 (3,033.39) 3.033.39 0.000% 10l CITY OF LA QUINTA ALL OTHER FUNDS REVENUE DETAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: CVAG CVWD County of Riverside Surface Transportation Funding City of Indio DSUSD IID RCTC Vista Durres Housing LLP SB821-Bicycle Path Grant State of California APP Contribution Developer Agreement Funding Litigation Settlements Transfers In From Other Funds TOTAL CIP REVENUE 0710112012.08/3112012 ADJUSTED REMAINING % BUDGET RECEIVED BUDGET RECEIVED 2,813,649.00 0.00 2,813,649.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,000% 17,913,052.00 0.00 17,913,052.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 698,305.00 51,000.00 547,305.00 8.520% 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.000% 81.028,256.00 25 283 310.83 55 744 945.17 31.200% 102,363,262.00 25,334,310.83 77,018,951.17 39.720% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND: Equipment Charges 584,824.00 97,470.54 487,353.46 16.670% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Sale of Fixed Asset 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.000% Insurance Recoveries 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 7,300.00 0.00 7,300.00 0.000% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 592,124.00 97.470.54 494,653.46 16.460% INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND: Charges for services 491,581.00 81,930.00 409,651.00 16.670% Capital Contribution 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Sale of Fixed Asset 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 .0.000% Transfers In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 495,781.00 81,930.00 413,851.00 16.530% PARK EQUIPMENT & FACILITY Charges for services Interest Capital Contributions TOTAL PARK EQUIPMENT & FAC SILVERROCK GOLF Green fees Range fees Resident Card Merchandise Food & Beverage Allocated Interest Income Insurance Recoveries Transfers In TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE Interest Transfers In TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FUND Transfer In Interest TOTAL LQ PUBLIC SAFETY 502,523.00 83,753.84 418,769.16 16.670% 9,700.00 0.00 9,700.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 512,223.00 83,753.84 428,469.16 16.350% 3,350,773.00 157,876.40 3,192,896.60 4.710% 159,973.00 5,628.00 154,346.00 3.520% 120,000.00 9,360.00 110,640.00 7.800% 311,048.00 15,556.68 295,491.32 5.000% 12,000.00 0.32 11,999.68 0.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 89,123.00 89,122.63 0.37 100.000% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% 4,042,917.00 277,544.03 3,705,372.97 6.860% 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.000% 67,015.00 0.00 67,015.00 0.000% 69,215.00 0.00 69,215.00 0.000% 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 100.000% 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.000% 2,100.00 2,000.00 100.00 95.240% SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION SAVINGS PLAN Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Interest 900.00 0:00 900.00 0.000% TOTAL SUPPLE PENSION SAVINGS PLAN 900.00 0.00 900.00 0.000% MEASURE"A" Measure A Stiles Tax 412,500.00 0.00 412,500.00 0.000% Interest 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% TOTAL MEASURE "A" 412,500.00 0.00 412,500.00 0.000% 108 s CITY OF LA GUINTA OTHER CITY FUNDS ADJUSTED 08/31/12 REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENTAGE LIBRARY FUND INTERESTADVANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% CAPITAL PURCHASES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 1,696,598.00 419,816.00 0.00 1,276,782.00 24.74% TRANSFER OUT 221,279.00 0.00 0.00 221 279.OD 0.00% TOTAL LIBRARY FUND GAS TAX CONTRACT SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 994,900.00 165,816.00 0.00 829,084.00 16.67% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% TOTAL GAS TAX FUND FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND: TRANSFER OUT 298413.00 720.64 297692.36 0.24% TOTAL FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND JAG GRANT TRANSFER OUT TOTAL JAG GRANT 1,402.00 0.00 0.00 1,402.00 0.00% SLESF(COPS) TRANSFER OUT TOTAL SLESF (COPS) FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% INDIAN GAMING FUND TRANSFER OUT 308.00 11IBM! ow 0.00 0.00 118 308.00 0.00% TOTAL INDIAN GAMING FUND LIGHTING 6 LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DIST: REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 960,000.00 160,000.00 0.00 800,000.00 16.67% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL LTGILANDSCAPING FUND RCTC TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL RCTC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FUND CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0.00% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL DEV AGREEMENT FUND CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE OPERATING EXPENSES 68,49D.00 13,674.71 0.00 54,815.29 19.97% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL CRIME VIOLENT TASK FORCE AS 939 OPERATING EXPENSES REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND TRANSFER OUT OUIMBY FUND: CONTRACT SERVICES REIMBURSE DEVELOPER FEES TRANSFER OUT INFRASTRUCTURE FUND CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND TRANSFER OUT 34,884.00 0.00 2,DD0.00 32,884.00 0.00% 73,625.D0 12,272.OD 0.00 61,353.00 16.67% 199480.00 0.0D 0.D0 199490.00 90 0.% TOTAL AB 939 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 8,998,032.00 0.00% TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00% 0.D0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 242.074.00 0.00 0.00 242,074.00 0.0D% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 109 10 CITY OF LA QUINTA OTHER CITY FUNDS ADJUSTED $131/2012 REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENTAGE PROPOSITION 10 - SO 1266 TRANSFER OUT TOTAL PROPOSITION 18 FUND 287,307.00 21.748.76 0.00 265,558.25 7.57% SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 40,200.00 0.D0 ODD 40,200.00 ' 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 375500.00 0.00 0.00 375500.00 0'00% TOTAL SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 0.00 0.00 4TS CMAQ PROJECT EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.DD% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 ODD 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL CMAQ TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% INTEREST ON ADVANCE 19,500.00 0.00 0.00 19,500.00 0.00% CONTRIBUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 ODD 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 2 748 895.00 (23 241.52) 0.00 2 769 886 52 1 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 2;7'B TdSW 7'i8,23f.52�0 2789',3HS.52�-.Bd'� PARKS 6 RECREATION INTEREST ON ADVANCE 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL PARKS 6 RECREATION CIVIC CENTER SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% INTEREST ON ADVANCE 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 0.00% REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 201,939.00 33,656.00 0.00 168.283.00 16.67% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS 0.D0 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00% INTEREST ON ADVANCE 9,400.00 0.00 0.DO 9,4DO.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 ODD 0.0D 0.00 0.00% TOTAL LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL COMMUNITY CENTER STREET FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% INTEREST ON ADVANCE 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,DD0.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL STREET FACILITY PARK FACILITY PROGRAM COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 2200D0 0.00 0.00 2200.00 TOTAL PARK FACILITY RR FIRE PROTECTION INTEREST ON ADVANCE 4,700.00 0.00 0.00 4,700.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 ODD 0.D0 0.00 0.00% TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION DIF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-APP 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00% OPERATING EXPENSES-APP 4,700.00 16.16 0.00 4,683.84 0.34% ART PURCHASES 111,500.00 0.00 0.00 111,500.00 ODO% TRANSFER OUT 400000.00 0.00 0.00 400000.00 0.00% TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CITY OF LA QUINTA OTHER CITY FUNDS ADJUSTED 8131/2012 REMAINING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET PERCENTAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PROJECT EXPENDITURES 101,632,653.00 25.334,310.83 0.00 76,298,342.17 24.93% PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS TO GEN FUND 720,609.00 0.00 0.00 720,609.00 O.DD% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT _ _310_ EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 410,516.00 36,837.51 0.00 373,678.49 8.97% DEPRECIATION EXPENSES 171,701.00 0.00 0.00 171,701.00 0.00% CAPITAL PURCHASES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.D0 0.0D% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OPERATING EXPENSES 363,263.00 89,530.91 0.00 273,732.09 24.65% DEPRECIATION EXPENSES 78,566.00 0.00 0.00 78,586.00 0.00% CAPITAL PURCHASES 106000.00 2901.31 0.00 103098.69 2.74% TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY OPERATING EXPENSES 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00% DEPRECIATION EXPENSES 502,523.00 0.00 0.00 502,523.00 0.00% CAPITAL PURCHASES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE FAC SILVERROCK GOLF OPERATING EXPENSES 3,821,023.00 456,899.53 0.00 3,364,123.47 11.96% TRANSFER OUT 87015.00 0.00 0.00 87015.00 0.00% TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF 11.75% SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE TRANSFER OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTAL SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS TAIL LA QUINTA PUBLIC SAFETY 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00% SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION SAVINGS PLAN CONTRACT SERVICE ENTAL PENSION SAVINGS PLAN 12.833.00 12,832.86 0.00 0.14 100.00% MEASURE"A" REIMBURSE GENERAL FUND 412500.00 68750.OD 0.00 343750.00 16.67% TOTAL MEASURE"A" 18.87% A 1 1 At;t1MENT Z N O C O LL E E Cl) dC4 mEN c > > m 0.9 -Da O r m Ua� G c E a C 0 N � � O C CD to O r00 �Cco V jO 01 0) O N N Q C'j N (D co i r 0+10�� ON 00 M O M O V O N N - O N M N 4p9 N N co O � m O O m N N N O❑❑ A O M N h N N i N w o Z Z 0 O. N Y C m p, m m m U Q ED LL E E c o m c m o ='m m E U U y E J E c °; c ❑ > o U c a Y m c m �Uo¢_ m� O 7 0 Y m O O Z calla A HmmlLL a'Jfq m N m 9 O a m 2 0 aU } 'U m y L 0 O C D X « C v'w v E yC m E m d « E m O C T C E y 5 N O N m N m my E d CL m L y ❑ "' 0 U N � a? FCF C m a C J m O 0 E O 0 m O U nmcr m m c «'> « m `o m o � U m � « c0 Q J m 112 13 CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement, Between the Cities of La CONSENT CALENDAR: Quinta and Indio for the Design and Construction of STUDY SESSION: _ the Coachella Canal at Madison Street and Avenue 50. Project Number 2009-02 PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Amendment No.1 to the Cooperative Agreement, Between the Cities of La Quinta and Indio, for the Design and Construction of the Coachella Canal at Madison Street, Project Number 2009-02, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement subject to any minor modifications approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Cities of La Quinta and Indio entered into a cooperative agreement on July 29, 2009 for the design and construction of the Coachella Canal Bridge at Avenue 50 and Madison Street. The City of Indio is requesting an amendment to add the widening and reconstruction of Madison Street between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 to this agreement. This amendment will achieve better coordination and possible cost savings by designing and constructing these projects simultaneously. FISCAL IMPACT: Approving this amendment will ultimately commit the City to funding an additional $1,442,395, for design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, inspection/testing/survey, contingency and administrative costs for the Madison Street widening and reconstruction improvements between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52. Transportation DIF Funding for both the Avenue 50 Bridge Widening Improvements ($350,000) and the Madison Street Improvements ($575,000) were appropriated within the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 through 2013/2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The street improvements will be constructed in phases. Per the existing agreement, the City would spend $319,942 for required bridge improvements. This amendment requires the City to provide $300,000 for the first phase of the street improvements which will widen the street by one lane within the existing right-of-way. Once the bridge is widened in the second phase, right-of-way will be required on the east side of the street in order to construct the ultimate street improvements in the third phase. Since currently funding only exists for Phases 1 and 2, the proposed amendment specifies that construction of Phase 3 will not be authorized until additional funding in the amount of $1,061,491 becomes available. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In addition to committing to pay for 75% of the Avenue 50/Madison Street Bridge Improvements CVAG has also agreed to pay for 75% of the street widening costs between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52. As lead agency, Indio has hired a consultant to design both projects and has requested the City amend the MOU for the bridge project to include the ultimate street improvements for Madison Street. Staff believes this to be in the best interest of both cities and therefore recommends approval of the amendment. ALTERNATIVE: Staff does not recommend any alternatives to the recommended action. Not approving this amendment would jeopardize CVAG funding for widening both sides of Madison Street between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 Respectfully submitted, n T- thy R J na P.E. Public Works Dir for/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Cooperative Agreement Amendment No. 1 114 C ATTACHMENT AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF COACHELLA CANAL AT MADISON STREET/ AVENUE 50 This agreement constitutes Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement for the Design and Construction of Coachella Canal at Madison Street/Avenue 50 (hereinafter "Amendment No. 1") entered into the 291h day of July, 2009, by and between the City of La Quinta, a municipal corporation and charter city, referred to herein as "LA QUINTA;' and the City of Indio, a municipal corporation, referred to herein as "INDIO." Amendment No. 1 is entered into this day of . 2012. LA QUINTA and INDIO are collectively referred to in this Amendment No. 1 as "Parties." RECITALS (1) INDIO and LA QUINTA previously entered into a Cooperative Agreement for the design and construction of certain Coachella Canal bridge improvements located at Madison Street and Avenue 50. (2) INDIO and LA QUINTA now wish to document a further agreement relating to the design and construction of certain roadway improvements described further below. (3) INDIO entered into a reimbursement agreement with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) on or about August 22, 2007 to design and construct the Madison Street improvements, from Avenue 50 to Indio Boulevard. (4) On or about September 6, 2009, LA QUINTA requested that the segment of Madison Street from Avenue 50 to Avenue 52 be included in the previously approved reimbursement agreement between INDIO and CVAG. (5) Amendment Number 1 to the INDIO/CVAG Reimbursement Agreement was entered into on or about October 21, 2009. Amendment Number 1 extended the southern project limits of work, from Avenue 50 to Avenue 52, obligated and authorized additional CVAG controlled Regional Funds toward the improvements, and included LA QUINTA as a signatory to the INDIO/CVAG Reimbursement Agreement. (6) Amendment Number 2 to the INDIO/CVAG Reimbursement Agreement was entered into on or about June 16, 2010. Amendment Number 2 removed the segment of Madison Street from Miles Avenue to Fred Waring Drive from CVAG's funding obligation. Amendment Number 2 did not affect the Madison Street Segment from Avenue 50 to Avenue 52. it 115 (7) LA QUINTA and INDIO entered into a Cooperative Agreement on or about July 29, 2009 for the design and construction of the Coachella Canal and bridge improvements on Madison Street at Avenue 50. (8) LA QUINTA and INDIO desire to amend the July 29, 2009 Cooperative Agreement to include the Madison Street Improvements, from Avenue 50 to Avenue 52, with the total project now referred to herein as the "STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS," and desire to specify the terms and conditions under which the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS are to be engineered, constructed, financed, operated, and maintained as well as the obligations and responsibilities of the PARTIES. (9) The project limits of the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS are located within both INDIO and LA QUINTA, with Fifty percent (50%) of the project area in INDIO and Fifty percent (50%) of the project area in LA QUINTA. (10) INDIO has secured funding for the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS at Seventy -Five (75%) from CVAG controlled regional funds for eligible roadway improvements. The remaining Twenty -Five percent (25%), plus ineligible roadway costs, is referred to hereinafter as the "Local Share". (11) The total cost (including soft cost and right of way) of the STREET IMPROVEMENTS on Madison Street, from Avenue 50 to Avenue 52, is estimated to be $9,463,861. The cost of the Coachella Canal Improvements were estimated at $2,559,535 in the original Cooperative Agreement. Therefore, the total cost for the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS is estimated at $12,023,397. (12) LA QUINTA wishes to ultimately contribute 50% of the estimated cost of the Local Share to complete the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS. The preliminary estimate of the Local Share of the STREET and CANAL IMPROVEMENTS is $3,522,982. Therefore, LA QUINTA's contribution is estimated to be $1,761,491. (13) INDIO wishes to ultimately contribute 50% of the estimated cost of the Local Share to complete the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS. Therefore, INDIO'S contribution is estimated to be $1,761,491. (14) Due to constraints on available funding, the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS will be constructed in as many as three phases. The first phase will likely include the adjustment of the centerline profile and reconstruction of the median lane and one lane in each direction for a total of three lanes. The second phase will include the construction of the Canal Crossing on Madison 116 Street at Avenue 50 in accordance with the provisions of the Cooperative Agreement, dated July 29, 2009. The third phase will include the balance of the ultimate improvements for a total of five lanes. In order for the third phase to proceed, acquisition of right-of-way would also be needed. However, it has not yet been determined whether that right of way will be acquired. That determination would be made at a future date once all legally required procedures are completed. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the PARTIES agree as follows: Section I of the original Cooperative Agreement is modified to read as follows: LA QUINTA AGREES: (1) To ultimately pay an amount equal to Fifty percent (50%) of the Local Share of STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS costs for design, right of way acquisition, construction, inspection/testing/survey, contingency and administrative costs as described on attached Exhibit "A." (2) To deposit a total of up to $1,761,491which figure represents LA QUINTA's estimated share of the cost of design, potential right of way acquisition, construction, inspection/testing/survey, contingency and administrative costs, as required to complete the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS. LA Quinta has already deposited with Indio $200,000 as part of the original Cooperative Agreement. La Quinta agrees to deposit an additional $200,000 when Phase 1 Construction goes to bid, and $300,000 when Phase 2 Construction goes to bid. The payment of the remaining $1,061,491 shall be based on the phasing of the project and funding availability (see Exhibit "B" for Estimated Cost per Project Phase). Phase 3 construction shall not begin until funding becomes available and all legally required steps are taken. The Parties recognize that Phase 3 may need to be delayed until adequate funding is obtained by LA QUINTA. All phases are estimated costs subject to adjustment based on actual cost of each phase. (3) To issue, free of charge, upon application by INDIO or INDIO's contractor, the necessary encroachment permits for required work within the LA QUINTA street right-of-way. Section II of the original Cooperative Agreement is modified to read as follows: INDIO AGREES: (1) To pay an amount equal to Fifty percent (50%) of the Local Share of STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS costs for design,, right of way acquisition, construction, 117 inspection/testing/survey, contingency and administrative costs as described on attached Exhibit "A." To cause the preparation of the Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) for the STREET IMPROVEMENTS. PS&E is to be prepared in accordance with the standards and practices of INDIO and LA QUINTA and all applicable laws and regulations. (2) To have final design documents and drawings for the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS prepared by or under the direction of a Civil Engineer registered and licensed in the State of California, and that the specifications, each set of plans and any reports shall bear the professional seal, certificate and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their preparation. (3) To apply for a no fee encroachment permit for work within the LA QUINTA street right-of-way, in accordance with LA QUINTA standard permit procedures; provided however, that LA QUINTA agrees to cooperate in the issuance of any required permits necessary for the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS. (4) To retain or cause to be retained for audit by LA QUINTA or other governmental auditors for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment, all records and accounts relating to construction of the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS. (5) Upon completion of the STREET AND CANAL .IMPROVEMENTS, to furnish LA QUINTA a complete set of full-sized reproducible "Drawing of Record" plans and refund any unexpended funds. (6) Notwithstanding items (1) through (5) above, INDIO shall have no obligation to incur costs related to Phase 3 work until LA QUINTA has provided its share of the funding for the work. Section III of the original Cooperative Agreement is modified to read as follows: IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (1) The total cost of STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS is estimated to be $12,023,397. The estimated cost of the LOCAL SHARE, after CVAG (75%) Regional Fund contribution is estimated at $3,522,982. (2) If based upon the construction bids and cumulative change orders, costs for the STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS, exceeds $3,522,982, INDIO, and LA QUINTA shall endeavor to negotiate in good faith to agree upon an alternative course of action. If, after sixty (60) calendar days from the date of bid opening, an alternative course of action is not agreed upon, this Amendment No. 1 shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent and without further action, with ». 118 each agency sharing incurred costs in accordance with the cost shares as set forth in Section I, Article (1), Section II, Article (1), and Section III, Article (1). (3) All contract change orders which individually or cumulatively exceed 15% of the bid price for the relevant contract bid items shall be submitted by INDIO to LA QUINTA for review and approval prior to authorization by INDIO to construction contractor. (4) In construction of said work, INDIO will contract for a representative to perform the function of Resident Engineer, and LA QUINTA may furnish a representative. LA,QUINTA's representative may consult with INDIO representative, but INDIO's decision shall be considered final. (5) Upon completion of all work under this Amendment No. 1, ownership and title to all materials, equipment, and appurtenances installed will be held by the city in which materials, equipment, and appurtenances are installed. Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, all other provisions of the original Cooperative Agreement shall apply to this Amendment 1 to the Cooperative Agreement as well as remain in full force and effect. (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank) %.. 119 CITY OF INDIO CITY OF LA QUINTA City of Indio City of La Quinta Dari Martinez, City Manager Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager 100 Civic Center Mall P.O. Box 1504 Indio, CA 92202 La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dated: By: Glenn Miller, Mayor Don Adolph, Mayor ATTEST: ATTEST: By: By. Cynthia Hernandez, City Clerk Susan Maysels, City Clerk APROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 Roxanne M. Diaz M. Katherine Jenson City Attorney City Attorney �..' . 120 EXHIBIT W MADISON STREET IMPROVEMENTS (AVENUE SO TO AVENUE 52) PREU MINARY ESTIMATE: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST NAG 75%ELIGIBLE LAQUINTA COSTSHARE INDIO COST SHARE 1 Mobilization IS 1 $275,000.00 $275,000.00 $206,250.00 $34,375.00 $34,375.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $183,000.00 $183,000.00 $137,250.00 $22,875.00 $22,875.00 3 Dust Control LS 1 $37,000.00 $37,000.00 $2),)50.00 $4,625.00 $4,625.00 4 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $3),000.00 $37,000.00 $2],]50.00 $4,625.00 $4,625.00 5 Hot Mix Asphalt TON 13,060 $75.00 $979,5W.00 $734,625.00 $122,437.50 $122,437.50 5 Rubber¢ed AC TON 4,240 $90.W $381,600.00 $286,200.00 $47J00.00 $4),)00.00 6 F'Class ll AB CY 11,630 $30.00 $348,900.00 $261,675.00 $43,612.50 $43,612.50 ] Curb and Guider LF 12,465 $12.00 $149,580.00 $112,185.00 $18,697.50 $18,697.50 8 Sidewalk SF 46,840 $4.00 $I87,360.00 ! : $0.OIj S93,680.001 $93,680.00 9 Handicap Ramps EA 10. $2,500.00 $25,00000 $DA0 $12,500.00 $12,50000 10 AC Be0n LF 1,340 - $8.00 $30,720.00 $8,04000 $1,340.00 $1,340.00 11 Driveway Approacls EA 8 $2,500.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 12 Cross Gutter SF 2,760 $10.00 $27,600.00 $20,700.00 $3,45000 $3,450.00 13 4" Decomposed Grande SF 37,100 $1.00 $37,10000 $27,825.00 $4,637.50 $4,637.50 14 Drainage Improvements LS 1 $sw.wo.00 $500,w000 $375,000.00 $62,5mx00 $62,500.00 IS Roadway Excavation CY 24,400 $1500 $366,000.00 $274,500.00 $45,750.00 $45,750.00 16 Cold Plane Asphalt Conaete SF 28,130 $1.00 $28,130,00 $21,07.50 $3,516.25 $3,516.25 17 Err"Dnveway EA 4 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 18 Adjust ED Manhole to Grade EA 1 $500.00 $500.0 $3]5.00 $62.50 $62.50 19 RemoveR2eloczte Fence LF 4,445 $12.00 $53,340.00 540,005.00 $6,667.50 $6,667.50 20 Remove Existing Wall LF 111 $50.00 $5,550.00 $4,162.50 $693.75 $693.75 21 Relocate Signs EA 19 $200.00 $3,800.00 $2,850.00 $475.00 $4)5.00 22 Remove/Replace Drop Inlet EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,m,w $750.00 $125.00 $125.00 23 Remove F isdng Sidewalk SF 648 $O.o $388.80 $291.60 $48.60 $48.60 24 Remove Existing Driveway SF 1,777 $0.so $1,056.20 $799.65 $133.28 $133.28 25 Remove Headwall LF 126 $50.00 $6,300.00 $4,725.00 $782.50 $787.50 26 RBlowte Mailbox EA 3 $250.00 $)50.00 $562,50 $93. 5 $93J5 27 Remove Existing Curb and Guider LF 1,355 $5.00 $6,)]5.00 $5,081.25 $846.88 $846.88 28 Remove Existing Cross Gutter SF 1,404 $0.60 $842.40 $631.80 $105.30 $105.30 29 Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Madison and Avenue EA LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,00000 $187,500.00 $31,250.00 $31,250.00 30 Traffic Signal at me Intersection of Madison and Avenue 52 LS 1 $250,00000 $250,000.00 $18),SW.00 $31,25000 $31,250.00 31 Develop Water Supply L5 4 $36,61].00 $36,61].00 $2],462.)5 $4,5)).13 $4,5)].13 32 Clearing and Grubbing t5 1 $ID,000.00 $20,0. OD $15,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 33 U.S.B.R Facility (See Olson Eng. Estimate for Detail) L5 1 $583,000.00 $583,000.00 $43),250.00 $!727 $72,875.00 34 Adjust Water Valve W Grade EA 17 $250.00 $4,250.00 $3,187.50 $531,25 35 Adjust Sewer Manhole to Grade EA 18 $1,00000 $18'WOOD $13,500.00 $2,250.00 36 Relocate Blow -Off EA 1 $5,000.00 $5p0000 $3,)50.00 $625.003) LANDSCAPE SF 48,000 $5.50 $264,00000 $0.00 $10 $132,000.0038 IRRIGATION 5F ",,000 $3.50 $168,000.00 so.w $0 $84,0000039 Canal Improvements t5 1 $1,800,000.00$1,90,wam SSL42S,'1=W. y} $20 $23],500.00SUSTOTALCONSTRUCTION COST: $],192,669.40 $4,911,232.05 $1,1 $1,140,)18.69 Estimated Soft Carts: Design:1 $857,28200 $609,09900 $124,091.50 $124,091.50 Inspeaion/Testing/Survay: $557,431.88 $418,073.91 $69,678.98. $69.678.98 Ory Admin: $359,633.47 $269,725.30 $4Q954.18 $44,954.16 Right of Way Acquisition: $1,494,000.00 $1,120,500.00 $186,750.00 $186,750.00 Contingency: $1,569,152.51 $1,176,864.38 $19611"06 $196,144.06 TotalFrtimate: $12,030,169.26 58,505,494.44 $1,]62,33].41 $1,762,33Z41 10/11/2012 NAG Contribution (]5%of Eligible Costri):11 $8,505,494.44 City of Indio Contribution (12.5%of eligible costs plus 50%of ineligible costs): $1,)62,33).41 OW of to Quints Contribution (12.5% of eligible Costs plus 50% of ineligible costs): $1,762,337.41 TOUI Conhlbution: $12,03.,169.2) . 121 EXHIBIT `B" COST ESTIMATE PER PROJECT PHASE for MADISON STREET AND CANAL IMPROVEMENTS FROM AVENUE 50 TO AVENUE 52 1. Phase 1 Construction: Street Improvement Design and Construction of Three (3) Lanes of Pavement between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52: $ 2,400,000 2. Right -of -Way Phase: Obtain Project Right -of -Way $ 1,800,000 3. Phase 2 Construction: Design and Construction of the Coachella Canal Improvements: $ 2,559,535 4. Phase 3 Construction: Construction of Remaining Street Improvements to Ultimate Width of Five Lanes $ 5,270,634 Total $12,030,169 'f, 122 CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with TY Lin International for Construction Management Services Associated with the Adams Street Bridge, Project Number 2006-06 RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: _ CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Contract Amendment No. 1, in the amount of $677,311, to the Professional Services Agreement with TY Lin International for Construction Management Services associated with the Adams Street Bridge, Project Number 2006-06. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TY Lin International is currently providing construction management and inspection services for the Adams Street Bridge Project. TY Lin expended a significant portion of the original construction management contract during start-up of construction and then in reviewing allegations by the original contractor in order to protect the City from future claims. Contract Amendment No. 1 (Attachment 1) provides additional funding in the amount of $677,311 for start-up of the replacement contractor as well as to extend TY Lin's services through October 30, 2013. Although construction should be complete by August 13, 2013, project closeout is anticipated to last through October 2013. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment will cost $677,311, with a revised contract total of $1,976,644. While over 88 percent of the funding for this project is provided by Federal Highways Administration to date the approved matching funding through CVAG and the City for the local share of this project is approximately $2.8 million. Including this amendment and construction change orders to date the local J" 123 obligation will be approximately $2.4 million. Additionally, due to the original contractor's abandonment of the work and the delay by the bonding company in hiring the replacement contractor, this project will be subject to liquidated damages in the estimated amount of $472,600 which will be retained by the City at the conclusion of the project. However, because the local approved funding is approximately $400,000 greater than the required local match, regardless of whether or not the City receives liquidated damages, adequate funding is available to support this request. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: FTR International, Inc. (FTR) officially abandoned the project on February 24, 2012. The performance bond company Arch, has taken over the project and retained Granite Construction Company to complete this project. Due to the additional project management work as a result of FTR's abandonment, TY Lin has identified additional construction management work necessary to complete the project through October 2013 (Attachment 1). The work program provided by TY Lin (Attachment 2) outlines the additional construction management work incurred before and after FTR defaulted on this project. In short, additional construction management support was necessary during the start-up of the original contractor, FTR International, that will also be required for the replacement contractor, Granite Construction. Additionally, TY Lin spent a significant portion of the original construction management contract budget reviewing and responding to extensive documentation supporting change order and other requests by FTR which was necessary in order to protect the City from future claims and possible law suits. Staff has reviewed this request and recommends approval of this contract amendment. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS The project is partially funded with federal funds and subject to prevailing wage. ALTERNATIVE: Halting construction in order to negotiate a contract with another construction management firm would jeopardize the federal funding on this project and delay completion of the work unnecessarily. With no other means to continue construction with adequate oversight of the contractor, staff cannot recommend any alternative to approving this amendment. 124 Respectfully submitted, aT. othy R ona s P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Contract Amendment No. 1 2. Narrative of TY Lin charges 125 ATTACHMENT I T"tY ^F dFQu&Z OCTOBER 2, 2012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT: ADAMS STREET BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2006-06 CONSULTANT: TV LIN International Attention: Mark Ashley, P.E. Senior Vice President 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92108 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 1 Pursuant to the terms of the original Professional Services Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the original scope of work and fee schedule for this Agreement. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the Agreement. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE This contract amendment authorizes additional contract funding, in the amount of $677,311, for TY LIN International to continue to provide Construction Management and Inspection Services on the Adams Street Bridge Project through October 30, 2013. TY LIN International's additional work request, dated September 10, 2012, is attached and made part of this contract amendment. Previous Contract Amount Through Contract Amendment No. -0- $1,299,333.00 Add this Amendment $677,311.00 Revised Contract Total $1,976,644.00 The contract completion date is extended through October 30, 2013. Submitted Date: By: Approved By: Date: We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as frill payment the amount shown above. Accepted By: Consultant: Title: Date: 1?6 A 1Y l Hal i M LUgzLu 197 •Lt INTERNATIONAL .;tn:,)ic �9rs; EE atnr315 f SC iei..lu': September 10, 2012 Mr. Timothy R. Jonasson, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: Adams Street Bridge Project — Additional Work Request to Provide Construction Management and Inspection Services on the Adams Street Bridge Project (City of La Quinta Project 2006-06) Mr. Jonasson, TY Lin International (TYLI) respectfully requests an amendment to our contract to complete the construction management and inspection services for the Adams Street Bridge Project. This letter will serve to clarify our request in relation to the original end date of the Project and the recently revised end date according to the Takeover Agreement between the City and Arch Insurance. The parameters for TYLI's existing contract and the original contract with FTR International are as follows: -Through August 31, 2012, TYLI has expended $938,110.59 of the original budget of $1,299,333.60. -Through August 31, 2012, $361,223.00 is remaining in TYLI's original budget. -The original end date for the contract with FTR International is January 24, 2013. -The original contract duration was 400 working days. -Through August 31, 2012, there are 306 days expended on the original contract. -Through August 31, 2012, there are 94 working days remaining on the original contract. -TYLI has estimated that $441,024.00 would be necessary to continue to maintain reasonable efforts from May, 2012 through the original end date of January 24, 2013 (See attached `Forecasted TYLI Budget — Amendment Request'). -TYLI will require an additional $79,801.00 ($441,024.00 - $361,223.00) to provide services through the original end date of January 24, 2013. The parameters of the Takeover Agreement (Agreement) between the City and Arch Insurance are as follows: -The Agreement allows for 380 calendar days from the NTP date of July 30, 2012. -The revised end date, per the Agreement, is August 13, 2013. -The Agreement represents an additional 139 working days added to the contract. An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/DN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, California 92108 1 T 619.692.1920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 w .tylin.com H128 LININTERNATIONAL -TYLI has estimated that an additional $597,510.00 will be necessary to maintain reasonable efforts from the original end date of January 24, 2013, through the revised end date of August 13, 2013, plus additional time for project close-out. TYLI respectfully requests a contract amendment in the amount of $677,311.00 ($79,801.00 + $597,510.00) to complete the construction management and inspection services for Adams Street Bridge Project. The attached Exhibit titled `Forecasted TYLI Budget — Amendment Request' explains the hours expected for each individual to maintain a reasonable level of effort on the project. Subconsultants and ODC's are represented by lump sum. We look forward to continuing to provide construction management and inspection services to the City and will work diligently to deliver a successful project. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, oseph Smith, PE Resident Engineer TY Lin International Attachment: Forecasted TYLI Budget —Amendment Request An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer M/FiDN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, California 92108 1 T 619.692.1920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 w Aylin.com ATTACHMENT 2 LININTERNATIONAL Hair-�.ers lk+rnars( i�iE�Is June 15, 2012 Adams Street Project - Narrative of TYLI Charges TYLI originally planned to staff the project with a full-time inspector, 2/3 time Resident Engineer, and a''/z time administrative assistant. Surveying, public outreach and materials testing and inspection subconsultants would be used as required. FTR's approach to the project resulted in the Construction Management Team having to staff the project with a full-time inspector, full- time Structures Representative, part-time Resident Engineer and full-time administrative assistant. At the beginning of a bridge project it is common for the Construction Management,Team's contract to have a percent complete higher than the actual work completed by the contractor. This is due to start up time, working out project issues and review of all submittals. On the Adams Street project this was the case. However, FTR's approach to the project, and their lack of knowledge of bridge building, quickly resulted in a major divergence between the amount of funds expended by the Construction Management Team and the amount of work completed by FTR (based on payment of work completed as a percentage of the total bid). The following is an explanation of the unorthodox approach that FTR had towards the Adams Street Bridge project which resulted in higher than normal CM charges: RFI's and Transmittals On a project of the size of Adams Street, the Construction Management Team would expect to receive approximately 25 Request for Information (RFI's). By the time FTR abandoned the project, they had submitted the equivalent of 130 RFI's (including resubmittals). The same paperwork barrage occurred with letters and transmittals where FTR repeatedly sought avenues to receive additional funds or ways to put issues back on the City. This unprecedented amount of paperwork had to be addressed and responded to by the Resident Engineer and/or Structures Representative. In addition, the administrative assistant was required to document and record all of the RFI's and letters to coordinate responses and maintain RFI and letter tracking sheets. Embankment and Surcharge TYLI staff was required to teach FTR managers how to construct a bridge while FTR was putting together their CPM baseline schedule. FTR's lack of knowledge of bridge construction was extremely evident when it came time for placement of embankment and surcharge for the abutments. Even though the specifications clearly stated the elevation and time duration of the surcharge, FTR fought the requirement to place embankment for two months. This resulted in multiple arduous discussions about the requirement and the effect it would have on their shoring design and construction. Multiple RFI's and conference calls took place to discuss the issue. Explanations by TYLI and the geotechnical engineer were required as well as the explanation of An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/DN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, California 92108 1 T 619.692.1920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 www.tylin.com 130 LI NINTERNATIONAL r I ¢eery i F i��3nei.i ( ^inn rf5ii the specifications and standard plans. TYLI communicated multiple times with the geotechnical engineer to determine if they would allow a reduction in the amount of fill and the duration of the settlement period. Typical bridge contractors would have simply placed the fill, waited for the settlement and constructed the abutment. This resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. Coordination with Imperial Irrigation District QIDj FTR was adamant about not having any responsibility for coordination with IID and working around IID's transmission lines. The specifications clearly stated that coordination was responsibility of the contractor and that the lines would not be moved. In the interest of partnering with the contractor and IID, and attempting to move the project forward, TYLI staff initiated communication between the two parties, coordinated meetings and tried to resolve the issue. TYLI also went through an extensive exercise to explain to FTR how the piles could be constructed with the lines in place. This effort required numerous all -day meetings resulting in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. Debating Slope Paving Pay Items From the first payment request in July 2011, through their time on the project, FTR debated and protested the specification that covered payment for excavation and backfill associated with the concrete slope protection. FTR never officially submitted a claim on this issue but formally protested every monthly invoice and was preparing to submit a Notice of Potential Claim (NOPC' for approximately $2M. TYLI staff repeatedly disputed FTR's claims and only paid per the specifications. FTR took the unprecedented approach to have the President of the company sit in multiple weekly meetings and request multiple subsequent meetings with TYLI and the City staff This issue continued for 7 months and resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond -what was expected. Debating Every Pay Estimate On a typical project, the owner's staff and the contractor's staff get together on a monthly basis and spend 4 hours maximum going over payment requests and settle on a monthly invoice request. Every month FTR would begin debating payment 2-3 days prior to the end of the period and continue for 2-3 days beyond the period, to a point where almost every invoice was submitted late. This resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. FTR Breaking 67 CV WD Air Vac Line FTR hit and broke a 6" air vac line owned by CV WD. This line was clearly marked by the underground service alert prior to excavation. The geyser resulting from the break destroyed the NE slope that FTR had been constructing for two weeks. TYLI had to spend unanticipated time coordinating with CV WD for repair of the line, discussions and meetings with the designer for a re -design of the line, additional inspection for reconstruction of the slope and an inordinate amount of time debating and responding to excessive correspondence from FTR. TYLI spent significant time disputing FTR's position that FTR was not responsible for the break. Additionally, TYLI monitored FTR's unsuccessful attempt to repair the 6" air vac line over a 2 month period. This resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/DN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, California 92108 1 T 619.692.1920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 w .tylin.com 131 Li INTERNATIONAL Materials -On -Hand Payment TYLI staff visited the yard of FTR's subcontractor, Integrity Rebar Placers (IRB), to inspect materials -on -hand (MOH). The request was made on the last day of the pay period and TYLI accommodated the rushed request. The City paid FTR on the August 2011 payment with the understanding and requirement that the MOH payment would go to IRB upon payment. TYLI learned from IRB that FTR refused to pay the money because IRB would not sign release paperwork. IRB refuted this claim and stated they would sign the appropriate paperwork. Four (4) months later, FTR stated that there was a discrepancy in heat numbers after their inspection of the materials. IRB was forced to release some of the materials on other projects since they were not paid by FTR in a timely manner. TYLI had multiple meetings and discussions with Integrity Rebar and FTR to get this issue resolved. Ultimately, TYLI agreed to re -inspect the reinforcement at Integrity's yard and FTR released payment in January 2012, five months after payment was received by the City. This resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. Debating Construction of CIDH Piles & Tunneling Permit TYLI had multiple meetings with FTR to explain the process of construction of the large diameter piles and the need for a tunneling permit due to the classification of the soil as potentially gassy. FTR fought this issue over several months, and after multiple meetings TYLI coordinated with the City and agreed to pay for the testing of the air within the pile. The inordinate amount of meetings associated with this routine foundation issue resulted in billings by TYLI above and beyond what was expected. Site Visits During Idle time (Including January and February) TYLI has been monitoring the site on a daily basis since FTR officially left the project on February 24, 2012. During this idle time on the project, TYLI has monitored traffic control measures and verified that directional signs are intact and correctly placed, verified that Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) BMP's are in place and operable, and performed an overview of the staging area to include the construction trailers. TYLI staff replaced locks on the trailers, placed safety `mushrooms' on top of reinforcement that was extending from the abutment footing, placed caution tape around the embankment areas and moved barriers to prevent bikes and vehicles from entering the site. TYLI staff coordinated with a fencing company to place fence at the north and south entrances to the site at the top of the channel to prevent people from entering the site. TYLI staff and subconsultant administrative staff retrieved and compiled contract information to allow Arch Insurance to obtain an assessment of the project and the status of FTR billings. TYLI staff met with Arch Insurance representatives at the site for a walk through and to explain the existing conditions and also assisted with the contractor walk- through that was performed with Arch representatives. It is important to note that FTR essentially abandoned the job at the end of December, 2011 with work randomly occurring in January and February. TYLI staffed the project in January and February 2012, with no knowledge of FTR's intention to abandon the project, however, FTR stalled considerably to a point where letters were sent from the City demanding a start date of the next major operation, the drilling of the large CIDH piles. An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/DN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, Califomia 92108 1 T 619.692A 920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 w Aylin.com 132 YLININTERNATIONAL Shop Drawings-Resubmittals TYLI will be required to review 15 shop drawings from the new contractor. Materials Re -Test TYLI subconsultants will be required to re -test concrete pours and create 32 cylinders and couplers and reinforcing bars. Summary In summary, and with the advantage of hindsight of the situation, FTR International gave the impression of a firm that did not have the knowledge and experience to construct the Adams Street Bridge. The constant stalling, bickering and negotiations that FTR staff engaged in almost daily, gave the impression that FTR never intended to expend the necessary resources to construct the bridge. Their actions gave the impression of a company that was having financial challenges from the very first working day of the project. l A-t t Joseph Smith,, PE Resident Engineer TY Lin International An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer WF/DN 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 1 San Diego, California 92108 1 T 619.692.1920 1 F 619.692.0634 1 www.tylin.com 133 • IT /SA/HA/FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Civic Center Campus Veterans Acknowledgement Area Applications RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve the names of veterans to be included on the Civic Center Campus Veteran's Acknowledgment Area. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Each year resident veterans submit applications to participate in the Veteran's Tribute event. These applications are reviewed by staff to assure program requirements are met. Once the City Council approves the candidates, their names, ranks, and date of service are etched into the bronze panels located on the Veteran's Acknowledgement Area sculpture. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of adding the names to the bronze plates will be approximately $400. This includes etching (10 names at $32 per person) and shipping costs. There is sufficient funding in the Art in Public Places budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On September 18, 2001, the City Council approved the criteria for the Acknowledgment Area monuments for veterans, artists and sports figures located on the Civic Center Campus. The criteria for the Veteran's Acknowledgement Area are listed below: 1. 3-year resident of La Quinta (past or present); and 2. Proof of Military Service: Form DD-214 or Notice of Separation. 134 The following classifications are considered veterans: All branches of the military identified by the Department of Veteran's Affairs; reservists who have served a minimum of six (6) years; and merchant marines who have served on Active Duty. There are currently 233 veterans listed on the monument. The following applications have been submitted for consideration as part of the Veteran's Acknowledgment Area: Name Branch of Service Date of Service David E. Hinkle Air Force 1962-1966 Lenard W. Wahlert Air Force 1967-1972 David V. Crouse Army 1969-1970 Brian R. Hoyt Army 1972-1997 Richard A. Moreno Army 1969-1971 Ronald D. Nawrocki Arm 1969-1971 Elias P. Hammam Navy 1940-1946 Ted Hammam Navy 1968-1970 David B. Robinson Navy 1952-1955 Marc E. Souza Navy 1969-1971 Applications and supporting materials are on file with the Community Services Department. Staff will confirm the spelling of names, ranks, and dates with the individual applicants. Staff is planning a special event for Sunday, November 11, 2012, Veteran's Day, at which time those listed as part of the Acknowledgment Area will be recognized, and a certificate will be issued to each of the individuals. ALTERNATIVES: Approve some or all of Veterans Applications received. Respectfully submitted, Edie ylt n Community Services Director 135 AGENDA CATEGORY: I1' SA/HA/FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM TITLE: Discussion of a Memorandum of I Understanding with the Desert Recreation District STUDY SESSION: _ PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct staff to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding with the Desert Recreation District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In an effort to improve services and reduce costs, the Desert Recreation District (DRD) and the City initiated preliminary discussions to provide recreation services in the community. Collaborating to provide these services would: • Reduce the cost of services • Avoid duplication of services • Increase communication and collaboration • Improve the recreation, health, and wellness offerings • Effectively communicate with residents regarding recreation services • Better define the roles of the City and DRD in the provision of recreation services in La Quinta. Staff has scheduled this Study Session to gain City Council and community input on providing shared recreation services with DRD. FISCAL IMPACT: This item has the potential for cost savings for DRD and cost recovery potential for the City. These savings and recovered costs would be identified in the negotiated Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 130 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In May 2012, Kevin Kalman, General Manager of the DRD, discussed the DRD Strategic Plan with.the Community Services Commission. The goals outlined in their plan mirror those in the La Quinta Community Services Master Plan completed in 2007. The goals include a focus on health and wellness services, increased agency collaboration and promotion of services. As part of implementing its Strategic Plan (Attachment 1), DRD then initiated a staffing reorganization plan and posted a job flier to hire a Community Services Coordinator to provide services at DRD's La Quinta facility. Upon discussions with DRD staff, it was determined that this Community Services Coordinator and other responsibilities in La Quinta could be better managed through working together. Further staff discussions with DRD surfaced the following areas of DRD/City collaboration: • DRD and the City would co -brand recreation programs and logos and, brand message on promotional materials including the activities guides, flyers, rack cards, press releases, the GEM, City website, and email blasts on recreation activities. • The City would utilize DRD staff to assist with large special events including Humana Health and Well-being events, City's Community Picnic, and the 4th of July Event. • The City would support the staff at the La Quinta Community Fitness Center. • Staff at the Fitness Center would attend City staff meetings and collaborate on fitness and recreation programs. • Agencies would work together to identify ways that Coral Mountain Open Space Park could be utilized. A portion of funding budgeted for a DRD Community Services Coordinator would be paid to the City for the above mentioned services, thus reducing costs to DRD and to increase revenue for the City. COMMISSIONS/BOARD/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: On September 10, 2012, the Community Services Commission discussed this item and unanimously supports the concept. On September 12, 2012, the DRD Board of Directors addressed this item and unanimously voted to move forward with the development of an MOU with the City. ALTERNATIVES Expand partnerships with other local non -profits or cities to seek additional opportunities for collaboration. 137 Respectfully submitted, Edie ylto Community Services Director Attachments: 1. DRD Strategic Plan it 136 ATTACHMENT 1 0 o�� Imo DESERT RECREATION D15TRICT LEVERAGE. COLLABORATE. PROMOTE. CONNECT. We have a healthy plan for our future. 139 NOW IT'STIME TO MOVE ON IT. We spent months listening, analyzing, researching, strategizing and focusing on Desert Recreation District and the diverse communities we represent.We wanted to find out how we can be better aligned with each community's parks and recreation programs. and services, goals and objectives and fiscal and budgetary needs, while still over -delivering on the expectations of citizens. Based on the extensive findings and a five-year strategic plan, we are making changes to the way we align with our community partners to better respond to the growing and • shifting needs of the people who use and need recreation programs and services. We are also leveraging information systems and technology that will allow us to be more efficient and cost-effective in delivering recreational services throughout our service area. The plan and timeline have been set in motion. The outlook is positive. The opportunities for each municipality partner are exciting as we move forward. Together. OURVISION ISTO HELP EACH COMMUNITY • Provide quality, barrier -free and safe services • Contribute to the overall wellness of citizens • Encourage healthy lifestyles • Promote positive, out -of -school activities • Coordinate and plan for better recreation facilities and trails 140 THIS IS OUR ROADMAP FOR SUCCESS, LEVERAGE RESOURCES Reduced tax dollars and shrinking budgets make it necessary to think differently in order to provide recreational programs and services that are important to the well-being of our citizens. You want residents to enjoy living in your community, thrive, support the local economy and see the city as responsive to their changing needs. Our five-year plan allows us to help you maintain, and even enhance, your offerings while operating as a transparent partner. Eliminate costly duplication • Utilize our staff/services where appropriate • Make projects more manageable • Save funds that can be allocated elsewhere • Increase the perceived value of tax dollars 141 By working as a team, we can implement projects and programs that support our common goals. Targeted marketing within your municipality will help increase program awareness and encourage increased participation. In addition, there Is an opportunity to expand services through unique and different partnerships, such as the Healthy Living program with Eisenhower Medic Center in La Quinta. And the Desert Recreation District Foundation can be better utilized to help support and underwrite funding shortfalls and new programs. Partnership presents new opportunities. • Facilitate plans for recreation facilities and trails • Encourage participation in revenue -producing areas • Generate new revenue streams • Co -brand programs with sponsors 142 PROMOTE HEALTHY LIVING One of the most important shared missions of your local government and the DRD is to influence the obesity epidemic and reverse unhealthy lifestyle trends. It's imperative to maintain core services through a vibrant parks and recreation program that encourages participation.A healthier population reduces the financial strain on community service providers and creates a more robust economy. Let's work together to encourage people to care about their health and that of their children. Quality recreation benefits all. jT+ Personal Fitness, enrichment, relaxation, revitalization, positive and healthy alternatives for youth, improved self-esteem, reduced stress Social Stronger and healthier families, ethnic cultural harmony, reduced anti -social behavior, enriched lives for those with disabilities Economic /�' Productive, healthier citizens, more attractive and profitable Sy'��'-- business climate `@tom 14 CONNECT PERSONALLY We aren't just talking about external changes. We are actually changing our organizational structure to create a direct communication channel between the DRD and your community. Now you can work closely with one DRD Community Service Coordinator dedicated to supporting your city's overall mission, goals, demographics and fitness and lifestyle needs.This allows us to be more proactive and responsive to emerging trends, taking advantage of opportunities to minimize challenges as we evaluate services between DRD and your organization. We're on your team. • Move from functional- to community -specific hierarchy • Establish stronger relationships between DRD and cities • Engage staff with broader range of skills • Maintain program -specific, district -wide specialists (i.e. (;ymnastics) • Identify community voids and opportunities faster • Provide more community -relevant programs and services ' j 144 145 0 DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT The goal of The District is to provide recreational programs that benefit your community. We look forward to collaborating as we raise the bar together. DISTRICT OFFICE Address: 45-305 Oasis Street Indio, CA 92201 Phone:(760) 347-3484 E-mail: info@myrecreationdistrict.com a w.facebook.com/MyRecreationDistrict m 2012-Desert-Recreatibn District.All rights reserved. 1V 1 146 rI� � CIE/ SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Discussion Of SilverRock Resort CONSENT CALENDAR: _ Development Proposals and Canal Update STUDY SESSION: _Z Ij1J_;)_010IIMHI►` 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 3, 2012, the City Council held a Study Session to discuss the future of the SilverRock Resort development. The City Council then directed staff to engage the development community to ascertain interest in proceeding with SilverRock development. The City has also been working with the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD") to identify costs and benefits of replacing the current canal (which is subsiding) with either a parallel canal or an underground conveyance system. This Study Session has been scheduled so that the City Council and community may receive presentation from four development entities that would like to work exclusively with the City to develop SilverRock. Staff will also be presenting an update regarding the Coachella Canal relocation and cost options. Both items will then be scheduled for City Council consideration in November 2012 and January 2013, respectively. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact with this action. Potential fiscal impact could include staff and legal expenses related to negotiating and drafting an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: During a study session on July 3, 2012, the City Council discussed future private development at SilverRock Resort. The City Council affirmed that it still wishes to pursue the original SilverRock Resort guiding principles and directed staff to conduct further discussions with developers interested in and financially capable of fulfilling that vision. 147 Staff subsequently contacted a variety of development entities regarding SilverRock development opportunities. Four development groups expressed acute interest and created conceptual plans. The conceptual plans are generally consistent with the SilverRock Specific Plan; however, future amendments may be necessary. Each group is proposing to be the master developer. Additional detail from each developer is included as follows: • Beverly Park Development Group (Attachment 1) • Discovery Land Company (Attachment 2) • Lewis Group of Companies (Attachment 3) • Meriwether Management Company (Attachment 4) Lowe Enterprises also expressed an interest; however, they are still working on development concepts and are not prepared to make a presentation today. A representative from Lowe will be in attendance. The next step in this process is to review their concepts with the City Council and the community. Then, staff recommends that the City Council consider selecting one firm to initiate exclusive negotiations regarding SRR property disposition and development. This would be scheduled for either the second City Council meeting in November of the first meeting in December. Each presenter has been informed that they have ten minutes to cover the following points: 1. The team's background and prior related experience. 2. Explain why their team is specifically interested in SRR. 3. A general overview of their proposal, including the site plan and rationale 4. Describe how their proposal aligns with projected market demand, and why their team's vision would be most successful. 5. Briefly describe the proposed development timeline. 6. Provide a summary of their team's financial capacity, equity resources and funding strategy. An opportunity for questions and answers will follow each presentation. Regarding the Coachella Canal relocation, staff recently met with CVWD. The two alternative plans (parallel canal and underground pipe) are nearing 75% design completion. Per the City/CVWD canal design agreement, CVWD's consultant will prepare cost estimates for the two alignment options. CVWD will also have a third party prepare independent cost estimates. This process will take approximately 60 days to complete (December 2012). The City will then have 30 days to review the cost estimates and select the preferred canal alignment (January 2013). It is CVWD's goal for the Coachella Canal realignment project to be under construction by summer, 2013, if they can secure required environmental approval. 148 Staff is seeking Council direction with regards to the next step(s) in selecting a developer. Staff is prepared to work with a particular development group via an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement, issue a request for qualifications, or engage additional developers for further discussion. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Powell Economic Development/Housing Manager Attachments: 1. Beverly Park Development Group 2. Discovery Land Company 3. Lewis Group of Companies 4. Meriwether Management Company 149 BEVERLY PARK DEVELOPMENT GROUP August 3, 2012 The City of L.a Quints The Beverly Park Development Group is interested in purchasing the land and development property available at SilverRock from the City of La Quints. We have the ability to pay cash upon close of escrow and are willing to work with the City of La Quints to agree on a fair and reasonable price and terms that will achieve both our objectives If the City of La Quints has a potential price in mind, we are receptive, within reason, to entering discussions on that basis. If the City of La Quints does not have a price, we would propose a fair and neutral process whereby we retain three appraisers: (1) the first would be chosen by the City of La Quints, (2) the second would be chosen by the Beverly Park Development Group and (3) the third would be chosen by the first two appraisers, who would appraise the land at today's fair market value. The value so determined would be the purchase price. We have suggested the appraisal process above so that the City of La Quints can be assured that the final purchase price will be determined fairly and objectively, but we are also open to other alternatives. With respect to the land under the proposed second golf course, the Beverly Park Development Group would prefer to buy the fee interest in the land if the City of La Quints, under its bond agreement, is allowed to sell that property. The same appraisal method as above mentioned could apply to determine the fair market value and selling price for that land. If however, the land may not be sold, the Beverly Park Development Group is willing to enter into a long term lease. As owner or long term lessor, the Beverly Park Development Group would develop the aforementioned land, which it believes would enhance the SilverRock property as well. Our development of the SilverRock property would include the improvement of the existing walls, entry streets, landscaping, and water features. We desire to assist the City's development of its public park requirement and to make all SilverRock grounds commensurate with those of Beverly Park Resort and Spa. These enhancements would include the new clubhouse described in our Development Proposal. As a next step, the Beverly Park Development Group hereby requests a Private Study Session with Staff and Council Members regarding our enclosed Development Proposal. At that session, we would have our design -build team of LZMK Partners and Turner Construction firms present to answer questions about our plans. In addition to the purchase price for the land that will be paid to the City of La Quints, we will also be prepared to discuss with you how this resort project will generate very significant income for the City of La Quints, including the following: More than $168,000,000 in transit occupancy taxes over the first 10 years of operation at an 11% TOT; and More than $21,000,000 in sales taxes at 1% over the first 10 years of operation. 151 We are looking forward to these initial steps in partnership with you to begin to create the number one destination resort in Southern California. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration of our project. Re, a !fully, Bri d e 152 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA � • 0 PRESENTS BEVERLY PARK RESORT AND SPA AT SILVERROCK LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 153 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA Prepared for The City of La Quinta August 2, 2012 Submitted by: Brian Adler Contact: (310) 713-2867 Development Proposal 8/2/2012 154 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I Executive Summary A. Investment Overview B. Key Features C. Development Information D. Investment Parameters. II Property Description A. Regional Setting B. Local Setting C. Property Description D. The Open Space Concept E. Status of Government Approvals III Market Analysis A. Marketing Strategy IV Development Analysis A. Development Costs B. Transient Occupancy Tax & Sales Tax Projections Development Proposal 8/2/2012 155 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA 1 Executive Summary Development Proposal 8/2/2012 16 156 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock _ _ La Quinta, CA A. DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW Beverly Park Resort and Spa Is a proposed ultra-excluslve luxury resort and residential community to be developed on approximately 283-acres in La Quinta (Riverside County), CA. The Property, nestled at the foot of the majestic Santa Rosa Mountains, enjoys views not only of soaring mountains but vistas of lakes, streams, and a one half mile -long water feature. It is bordered on the West by the Mountains, on the East by The Hideaway Country Club, and on the South by PGA West. The Resort hotel, spa, and golf course will be lushly landscaped to reflect the natural purple mountains and sparkling sunlight which have made La Quinta the "Gem of the Desert". Beverly Park Resort and Spa will be an exclusive resort with a luxury 5-Star hotel and residential enclave comprised of 400 premium single rooms; plus 35 two -bedroom suites each with one lock -out room; 1 Presidential Suite; 4 Premium Suites; 25 Wellness Retreat Suites. A Resort Villa enclave comprised of 121 two -bedroom villas each with a one -bedroom lock -out room; 81 three -bedroom villas each with 2 one -bedroom lock -out rooms; 49 three -bedroom villa/pavilions each with 2 one -bedroom lock -out rooms; An additional 13.79-acre site will be an Estate Enclave consisting of \, 50 exquisite villa/pavilion private residences. The Wellness Retreat will be at or above the level of the current world -class spas such as Miravai or Aman Resorts in its 25 V. Wellness Retreat suites. The Retreat will have its own entrance �^ with waterscaping and a bridge creating a tranquil world of its 1 own. Separation will be created through the use of landscaping V. to protect the privacy of Retreat guests, who will stay primarily for one and two week intervals. Not only will Retreat guests enjoy their own private facilities, they will also enjoy the beautiful miles -long hiking trails of the Beverly Park Resort and Spa. Development Proposal 8/2/2012 it 157 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA 8. KEY FEATURES • The Beverly Park Resort and Spa will be unparalleled in the Desert. Beyond the Spa and golf packages, there will be Destination Packages for the resort's emphasis on weddings, convention, and family vacations The Resort will be an incomparable environment, surrounded by a Fazio -type signature golf experience that represents the pinnacle of golf available in the world. • A world -class restaurant and retail component will include restaurants and shops like those available at the Bellagio, Wynn, and Encore Hotels in Las Vegas. • The Boutique component will be the "storefront type' as satellites to many of the same shops that are featured on famed El Paseo Drive twenty minutes away in Palm Desert. These stores will be built and underpinned financially by the Resort Developer/Partners. • Restaurants will likewise be Owner/Developer partnerships that are underpinned by Resort Developer/Partners in order to attract Restaurateur/Chefs such as Wolfgang Puck. • The world -class Spa and Destination Resort amenities will be complemented by onsite activities for Hotel guests and Villa Owners including golf, tennis, swimming, water and beach volleyball, basketball, etc. Horseback riding, hot air ballooning, and trips to nearby Indian Gaming Casinos are among the many activities that will be offered offsite. • A 37-acre public park, in cooperation with the City, may include water features, topiary animal- themed landscaping, and an amphitheater. • The Property includes an existing public champion signature Arnold Palmer golf course and temporary clubhouse. The existing driving range will service both SilverRock and Beverly Park Resort and Spa's golf courses. • A new 30,000 sq. ft. clubhouse next to the driving range will consist of 20,000 sq. ft. dedicated for public use and 10,000 sq, ft. dedicated to the use of Hotel guests and Villa Owners. The SilverRock clubhouse -side will be built consistent with the prescribed and entitled Specific Plan. The Hotel -side of the clubhouse will have a private bar and grill service and the locker room will have Resort Hotel attendants. Development Proposal 8/2/2012 t 158 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock U Quinta, CA C, DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Location La Quinta, Growth Area East of Palm Springs, CA Site Area 283 acres Hotel Premium Rooms 400 at 500 square feet each Hotel Suites 35 at 1,500 square feet each Premium Suites 4 at 2,500 square feet each Presidential Suite 1 at 7,500 square feet Villas 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 3 Bedroom Villa/Pavilions 3 Bedroom Villa/Pavilion Private Enclave Signature Golf Course Retail/commercial Convention Center Development Proposal 121 at 2,000 square feet each 81 at 2,600 square feet each 49 at 3,500 square feet each 50 at 3,500 square feet each 18 championship holes 81,000 squarefeet 120,000 square feet 8/2/2012 159 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SiiverRock _ La Quints, CA DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS Seller Sales Agent/Broker Investment Offered Existing Debt Investment type Total cost of Development Cost per build -able square foot Development Proposal City of La Quinta Joseph Solomon Fee simple None at closing Mixed use Hotel/Resort/Retail/Residential $767 Million $280-300 per square foot 12 1.60 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock L.a Quinta, CA 11 Property Description Development Proposal 8/2/2012 1,61 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock L.a Quinta, CA A. Regionol Setting The SilverRock Resort Specific Plan Area is located approximately 105 miles from the City of Los Angeles and the Pacific Coast and approximately 240 miles from the Phoenix/Scottsdale metropolitan region. The Specific Plan Area is located on the gently sloping floor of the Coachella Valley in the general vicinity of Palm Springs and is located within the corporate limits of the City of La Quinta in Riverside County. The City of La Quinta, a 35.05-5quare-mile municipality located in the southeastern portion of the Coachella Valley, was incorporated in 1982. The City is bounded on the west by mountainous land and the City of Indian Wells; on the east, by the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County; on the north by Riverside County; and federal and County lands to the south. S. total Setting The SilverRock Resort is accessible from Interstate 10 by way of Jefferson Street. The Specific Plan Area is generally bordered by Avenue 52 on the north, Avenue 54 on the south, Jefferson Street on the East, and the Santa Rosa Mountains on the4' west. The Specific Plan Area is bisected by the Coachella " Canal, which flows west from Jefferson Street and then turns a south within the project site. Surrounding uses include The Citrus residential and golf ter, course community to the north of Avenue 52, The Hideaway ;, : „,, _.'v_n„" ="F residential and golf course community to the east of Jefferson Street, and the PGA West residential and golf course community to the south of Avenue 54. C, Property Description The land for the Beverly Park Resort and Spa is slightly irregular in shape and contains approximately 283 acres. It has several physical features besides it being situated in a wind free cove that have a positive effect on its market value: (i) the tract is situated in the line of community growth. (ii) It is generally on an alluvial fan just above the desert floor, level to gently sloping, and provides vistas of the adjacent mountains, desert floor, and the countryside. The topography is quite conducive to a wide variety of development plans, including golf courses and real estate development. The development plan for SilverRock has used the characteristics and qualities of the natural landforms to guide the location of golf and recreation sites, roads, building sites, and open space areas. Golf Course amenities, which serve as open space for SilverRock, are generally Development Proposal 8i2i2012 162 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA located in low lying areas of the site while the higher elevations are generally reserved for club facilities, hotel, and tourist commercial building sites. D. The Open Space Concept 5iiverRock is designed in recognition of the fact that as urban and suburban development takes place, creation and open space becomes a limited and valuable resource. In addition, it is recognized that high -quality projects are designed and planned around an open space/recreation program. Two types of open space/recreation uses are planned for 5iiverRock: golf courses and common open space areas. The majority of the project area is dedicated to open space in the form of two championship 18-hole golf courses, public park space, and '., common open space areas. To further maximize the effect of open space, common open space areas are strategically located throughout the project. These common open space areas will result when resort units are clustered or higher density hotel and commercial uses are developed along golf course areas. Where appropriate to the adjacent villa development, common area pools will be provided. Higher hotel and villa pads make the best use, not only of the golf course frontage, but also of the prevailing breeze and spectacular Coachella Valley mountain views. Development Proposal 8/2/2012 163 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRocic La Quinta, CA E. Status of Government Approvals The Specific Plan for SilverRocic was approved by the City Council of La Quinta on July 18. 2006 by Resolution 2006-083. All the proposed development uses for the Beverly Park Resort and Spa are as of right under the Specific Plan. Under the City of La Quinta Zoning Laws, the Developer is required to submit applications for grading permits and building permits prior to commencing construction activities. SilverRock/Arnold Palmer golf course The existing entrance and sense of arrival at the SIIverRock/Arnold Palmer champion signature golf course will undergo a beautification program. All roads and walls will be brought up to Beverly Park Resort and Spa standards in order to make the entire experience the finest of its type in the Desert. The Arnold Palmer course will also serve as the overflow golf course for the Hotel guests and Villa/Pavilion Owners. This will be on a negotiated basis of rounds between the Resort and the City. Development Proposal 8/2/2012 164 Beverly Park Rcsort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA III Marketing Strategy Development Proposal 8/2/2012 163 ,Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock _ U Quinla, CA A. Marketing Strategy The Developer intends to enter into an exclusive branding arrangement with Starwood Hotels and Resorts to develop the project as a Luxury Collection Resort. The Luxury Collection is a selection of hotels and resorts offering unique, authentic experiences that evoke lasting, treasured memories. For the global explorer, The Luxury Collection offers a gateway to the world's most exciting and desirable destinations. Each hotel and resort is a distinct and cherished expression of its location; a portal to the destination's indigenous charms and treasures. Magnificent decor, spectacular settings, impeccable service and the latest modern conveniences combine to provide a uniquely enriching experience, Today, The Luxury Collection is a glittering ensemble of more than 75 of the world's finest hotels and resorts in more than 30 countries. All are noteworthy for their history, architecture, art, furnishings and amenities, highlighting the rich culture of each property's fabulous surroundings. The Luxury Collection seamlessly integrates local customs and location into the guest experience, while fulfilling every desire with extraordinary service. In addition to promoting the resort through the strategic alliance with Starwood, the Developer Intends to leverage key relationships with internationally renowned publications such as Architectural Digest, Golf Digest, the New York Times Style Magazine and several other Publications to secure feature spreads, layouts and articles which will be blended with strategically placed print ads that will subliminally market the development to the affluent target market. Tastefully created television ads will be developed and broadcast with complimentary programming in the major markets on the West Coast including San Francisco and the Silicon Valley, Los Angeles, Irvine, San Diego and other affluent markets, Development Proposal 8/2/2012 166 _ Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA IV Transient Occupancy Tax and Sales Tax Analysis Development Proposal 8/2/2012 161 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock L,a Quinta, CA A. Development Costs Resort Hotel & Wellness Center (505 Keys) Land Acquisition $ TBD Hard Costs 127,620,000 Furniture Fittings & Equipment 81,120,000 Soft Costs 44,690,935 Resort Villas (632 Keys), Golf Course, Retail, Etc. Land Acquisition $ TBD Hard Costs 339,751,600 Furniture Fittings & Equipment 68,651,000 Soft Costs 84,237,169 Development Proposal 8/2/2012 168 Beverly Park Resort and Spa at SilverRock La Quinta, CA B. Summary of Transient Occupancy Tax & Sales Taxes The attached projections (2 pages)reflect that in the year 2015 the Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") begins and by 2019 reaches stabilization. Please note that by the fifth year of operation from the 505 hotel keys there is a total of $24,015,256.00 received bythe City of La Quinta. In the 632 key Resort Villas TOT also starts in 2015 and in the fifth year stabilizes and produces in excess of $36,292,821.00 for the City of La Quinta. After 10 years of operation the TOT projected to be received by the City will be in excess $158,000,000.00 from combining both Hotel 505 keys and the Resort Villas 632 keys (1137 keys for Beverly Park Resort and Spa ). The projections also reflect 6 categories of sales tax revenues that will add in excess of $21,000,000.00 to the City over 10 years. Development Proposal 8/2/2012 t 169 %a ��"s,s3 sA ffiosoffie ^frg A Rg GRAM., a.� Ng,�m$� Ro a8888$ %ffiB �,RB ffisssr� F A$$FF s>ns>a>ra �AssFN saas^s F $$$F$ xvs:;ss r $AREA xssaa� "`a38 m3 ;o 883$affi A AAAFA 8 GSfi 85, AAA$'$ s�s�an As$sFA s�w�a�a �M�R�P^ FFS WFxs :4FN nIXF �«d8 aF FIX« °."syy!�QsQac$�v�s4gt mo i xFF KNF SQ���eR i gag G.A i «ffiMh��« i 883.5, a 9,Ms S "d MMEoggrqtQ $ « >n Tax A,§,nA oPNNN�M �Op N Y x �UMQ �"ASw»p8 e xFF H�iio� ,:!4xg;; x c azs�ea MH i A a 6 o R 110 ik » snxs sm "a4fi Ama�:s c.:g.: �fhR^BRR «A 61 fig:sx "$as$ 87 9; »cce^ s tR cg s x„ ^qs ms s$$ x$a �nA�k m "xu m Naa„^s» Maa^a5tt N< » OUW <<& z gas a ce7sac s$rse s".n mmEo"a. y C'12Fr,ds& .j-has �aa«ss� rc - Y Ag gsw$s$ :=$>axx e�'«?�sDia x��g$asa ry mxfi$$ m°"'ip s 88 $88888 SA:,S .. r L 6%<6AR t tttatx o 5fr5fi Hy di a MCI! &I� 171 A ADLER DEVELOPMENT G R 0 U P BRIAR' ADLER RESUME Brian Adler is President of Adler Development Group, one of the leading developers on the Westside of Los Angeles, which includes the communities of Beverly Hills, Bel Air, Holmby Hills and Beverly Park. Mr. Adler, as general partner, has completed developing the final phase of Beverly Park, a 325-acre estate enclave in Beverly Hills, which is the finest and last of its kind in the exclusive Westside area of Los Angeles, Beverly Park is considered to be the premier guard -gated enclave in the United States. In directing the development of Beverly Park, Adler was personally involved in every aspect of the project, from the master land planning to all presentations and sales for each buyer, to overseeing the design and floor plans of the estates in his capacity as Architectural Review Committee Member, as well as developing several of the estates in Beverly Park. Overall values of estates in Beverly Park are presently from approximately $20,000,000 to in excess of $100,000:000, Mr. Adler's comprehensive and intimate knowledge of meeting the needs of the discerning estate buyer comes from over 40 years as a leading real estate broker and developer in Beverly Hills, Bel Air & Holmby Hills. I le is a former co-owner of Harlcigh Sandler Realtors and the former Chairman of Merrill Lynch-Sandler/Adler Realty. Adler was also the founder and a principle in Equity Title Company. Adler's brokerage company and its upscale Rodeo Realty division were acquired by Merrill Lynch in 1982. At the time, Adler's company was the leading residential real estate broker on the Westside. The brainchild of Adler, the innovative Rodeo Realty pioneered the $1 million -plus real estate market on the Westside of Los Angeles and set the precedent for marketing to the discerning affluent buyers of the area. Following the acquisition, Adler became Chairman of the Board of Merrill Lynch-Sandler/Adler Realty. Stimulated by the desire to meet new challenges, Adler subsequently chose to refocus his experience and energy toward a new venture. He proceeded to build a residential real estate development company specializing in estate properties. Adler Development Group became the Westsidc's leading developer of residential high -end real estate, raising the bar for discerning clientele on the Westside of Los Angeles. Adler has also just completed La Terrasse, Beverly Hills, a five -story, 20-unit residential condominium building. He was personally involved in all aspects of design, construction and sales in the only new building in Beverly Hills for discerning clientele. Once again, his expertise and high standards for interior and exterior elevations as well as sophisticated high -end finishes have permanently influenced the overall expectations in the market place., 112 firm profile I Cif" !' ' � e U;1 `.-of-r%:ri (, the nation's leading general builder, is committed to elevating Industry standards for safety, collaborative delivery methods, innovation and quality. Our team works in partnership with our clients, design professionals, and trade partners to leverage the talent and expertise of all staff to ensure project success. The Southern California office of Turner Construction Company is a fully integrated, completely staffed construction organization providing all services necessary to manage work undertaken in the region. It is composed of company trained, career oriented individuals with extensive experience. The Southern California organization includes over 250 permanent employees who perform the management, estimating, purchasing, accounting, consulting and operational functions necessary for construction projects of any size. Turner has Southern California offices in Anaheim, Los Angeles, and San Diego. i 041 N 0, i f Ii) N t� I 'Ai.i1F$ Turner provides comprehensive building services to our clients, leading developers, and institutions who recognize the value of a partner who works diligently and creatively to find the best possible solution for each particular project. we set new standards of performance, based on enduring core values that continue to guide our efforts today. Teamwork- We recognize that our primary asset is our people and the relationships that each build with our clients. Therefore our focus on people endures the requisite tools and support to fully serve you and to build the best teams in business. integrity - Business is based on trust, and we remain true to our founding principles of quality, honesty and hard work. our adherence to the highest ethical standards has enabled us to build the strongest client relationships in business today. Commitment - We are committed to your success and are proactive in finding solutions for you that best achieve your goals. This personal attention builds productive, lasting associations. our founder referred to clients as "respected friends." That attitude continues today and inspires us to deliver in every aspect in our business with you. relevant experience TERRANEA RESORT & HOTEL - RQ;;rnp FOB;>c The project consisted of 102 acres of infrastructure and site improvements, which included construction of a 360-room luxury hotel tower, 13 casitas, 10 villas, five bungalows and related public facilities. The project also included construction of a 55,000 sq. ft. conference facility and a 20,000 sq. ft. spa. MIRA MONTE RESORT & SPA n C+t vVe;:s, Preconstruction and general contracting services for the lobby renovation at this hotel, as well as the addition of a new 11,000 sq. ft. ballroom with a small kitchen. The project scope also included associated site work, an event lawn, and a new surface. parking area. IRONWOOD COUNTRY CLUB Pear IJP3e tT, t C.ilJOrn�O Turner provided preconstruction and construction services .for the Ironwood Country Club. The project consisted of a new 48,000 sq. ft. Clubhouse, consisting of a golf pro shop, kitchen, bar and lounge, an expanded golf cart barn, locker rooms, dining, card rooms, outside terraces, administration offices, and an outdoor barbeque area. The 50,000 sq, ft. Sports Center contained a tennis pro shop, lounge, kitchen, fitness/aerobics area, locker rooms, offices, massage rooms, and additional site work. The project also included a 2,200 sq. ft. Spikes Building, which is a halfway house, consisting of a kitchen, dining and lounge area, restrooms, and covered terraces. LISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER ANNENBERG' PAVILION The new, 260,D00 sq. ft. Annenberg Pavilion houses 126 inpatient beds on the second, third and fourth levels with each of the patient rooms fully equipped with the latest monitoring capabilities and state -of- the -art technologies. The ground level houses 34 beds in the critical care units, while the lower level houses the cafeteria, Information Systems, Environmental Services, Nutritional and Materials Management departments. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT P!sir�; SPr%�'gS. {,7;Ijt'>/ni0 The project is a 4,000 sq. ft, tenant improvement and renovation of the Transportation Security Administrative offices area. lunm ..%_ 114 ..,>.. 17 tal Innovation Drive Suite 100 A R C H I T E C T U R E 12MK Partners has built a reputation based on the premise that design solutions should be creative as well as provide long term value. Today, using current technologies to develop timeless, environmentally -sensitive and cost-effective solutions, 1ZMK is one of Southern California's most respected and sought-after architecture, planning and urban design firms. Since 1961, the firm has specialized in residential, commercial and educational design. It has distinguished itself as an innovative problem solver in the design of single and multi- fainlly housing, including affordable and senior communities, as well as in luxury and resort projects. INK has simultaneously proven its talents in the specialized disciplines of commercial and educational facility design. These buildings continue to attract quality tenants and minimize user turnover. 1ZMK Partners offers comprehensive expertise in: Feasibility Studies, Land use Analysis, Master Plans, Educational Facilities, Site Planning, Programming, Design Guidelines, Architectural Design, Construction Documents, and Construction. Services. 1ZMK Partners has received many awards for design excellence from both the architectural community and the building industry. In addition, the firm's work is recognized by frequent publication in industry journals. Although innovation is always one of the company's primary objectives, the team is careful to balance imagination with client needs and cost considerations. As a result, the firm continues to be associated with successful real estate development organizations. Itvlee, eatiloinis 02617 p 949.1561.d600 1949.901.400t w,,w.jt cos pxrtoors. cam P L A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I G N For over two decades, Don has served as the principal in charge of numerous award - winning projects. Don's work is published in a variety of international architectural magazines and books. He has been Invited to speak in Poland, China and Mexico and is currently working on projects in 10 different countries. Don speaks extensively on high density and senior housing at a number of conventions including ULI, NAHB, PCB(, NCOSH, and Multi -Housing World Convention. His civic and professional involvements include being the 1996 Chair of the National AIA Housing Committee and serving as a liaison with the National AIA Construction Documents Committee for three years. He is actively involved with the Building Industry Association and was recently recognized as Volunteer of the Year for HomeAid, which raises moneyto help house the transitionally homeless. He serves on the Board of Directors for HomeAid America, and is a member of the Education Committee for AMAR. Don was inducted as a "Fellow" of the American Institute of Architects in 2009, considered "one of the higuest honors bestowed to a select group of architects by a jury of their peers.' In 2008 Don and his wife, Julie Brinkerhoff -Jacobs, were honored by the Association of Fundraising Professionals as "Fundraising Volunteer of the Year." Don and Julie were also Inducted into the California Building Industry Hall of Fame in San Francisco, CA in June of 2008. Don is NCARB certified and is currently licensed in California, Texas, Illinois, Arizona, Florida, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Hawaii. He holds a Bachelor of Silence Degree in Architecture from the University of Cincinnati. 131 Innov a pion Di ivo suiro 100 hvbio. eahlwnia 9e617 p 949.661.4600 f 949,867.4001 ,v,vv,.jemkpannea.eom A R C H 17 E C 1U R E P L A N N I N G IJ R 9 A N D E S I G N .,141.- 177 In 1991 Eric joined Dorius Architects as Director of Design where he supervised all architectural design activities at the firm. The firm later became 16Z Architecture and Planning in 1994, then later 1ZMK Partners In 2005, His primary responsibilities include the direct supervision of all architectural design activities at the firm, as well as business development and client relations. He brings over twenty five years of design expertise to the firm. His designs have been published in numerous magazines and international professional journals. He has served as Principal -In -Charge for numerous projects including custom homes, multifamily projects, mixed -rise developments, urban Infill projects, residential high rises, resorts, senior communities, golf clubhouses, and a city hall. lies designs have won national and international recognition with awards including the AIA Award of Wit, the Gold Nugget Award, the Builders Choice Award, the NAHB Nationals Award, and the MAME Award. Eric speaks extensively at a number of conventions and conferences including the ULI, PCOC, NAHB, and the BIA, on subjects ranging from trends in residential architecture to high density urban infill design solutions. He has also served numerous times as a judge. for the PCBC Gold Nugget Awards program. Eric studied architecture at the University of Southern California School of Architecture, and has held his Architect license in California since 1991. He Is a member of the American Institute of Architects, and Is NCARB certified. He Is also am ember of the US Green Building Council, and is a LEE Accredited Professional. He is active in fund raising efforts for the American Cancer Society, the YMCA, and Laguna Beach School Power. He volunteer's as coach of the Thurston Middle School surf team, in Laguna Beach. 131 Imlorallon Drive Suite 100 ovine Califarnia 92611 p 940. 861.1,600 1 949.061.4601 vrtmpinkparlrers.com A R C If I T L C 'r U R L P L A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I G N 111 -, 178 With thirty five years of planning and architectural experience, Anastacio has been Involved in numerous award -winning projects. His expertise encompasses a diverse range of building typologies including single•. and multi-familyhousing, and well as mixed -use, resort and hospitality, commercial, educational and institutional projects. His principal leadership and project involvement spans the Middle East, Costa Rica, China, Mexico and the United States. Prior to joining 1ZMK Partners, Anastacio was founder and principal/owner of Anastacio Martinez Associates (AMA),an architectural practice that was operated in Newport Beach, California for a six year duration. As Director of Operations for IZMK Partners since November of 1999, Anastacio is responsible for all aspects of project management, client relations, office management, supervision of design activities, and most importantly, continued growth of the company. In 2005, Anastacio also assumed the role of Director of Architecture, responsible for overseeing the quality control of the construction documents and the construction phase of all projects handled by the Architecture Studio. In April of 2007, he became Chief Operating Officer for the firm overseeing strategic planning such as financial strategies, business development, and legal matters- Cachi is also responsible for the operational and financial activfUes for all satellite offices. In addition, he leads the design and planning teams for our projects In the Middle East. Anastacio is a licensed Architect in California and Arizona since 1985 and is a member of the American Institute of Architects. He attended Stanford University and received a Bachelor of Architecture degree from the University of Arizona. Anastacio frequently speaks on up-and-coming architectural and industry trends. 131 Innovation Dove Suite too ovine. California 92611 IN 949.9614600 1 949, 961.4601 w WW.j ran kPat IN or 6.4 o of A R C H I T E C T U R E P L A N N I N G ll R B A N D C S I G N Emily Xiaowen Dal joined JZMK in 2002, As Director of China Operations, Emily Is responsible for business development, project administration, and design coordination in our China office. Thanks to her professional background and living experience in China, she is an active part of 1ZMK's design team who specializes in finding design solutions that fit in the local culture and context of our China clients. Emily's recent projects vary from luxury residential communities to educational facilities to large scale commerical buildings such as $hoping centers, hotel towers, and mix -use complexes. Jade Valley Villas, Nanjing Medical University New Campus, Oushang Plaza, European City, and Yanlord Towers are just a few of them. Emily attended the Undergraduate Program of Architecture and the Graduate Program of Urban Design with Southeast University In Nanjing, China; and she attended the Doctoral Program of Architecture with Georgia Institute of Technology In Atlanta, USA. Emily is a top -grade licensed architect in China. 131 innovation ntive Suite 100 Irvine.. California 92617 p 90.961.e600 1 9e 9. 061.4 601 wwn.J:mtpxnneis.Con A R C H I T E C T U R E P I. A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I G N u. 180 TEAM PROFILE „ A recent achievement is the high density, urban in -fill project along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China that includes high Ilse residential towers, high -end retail, a marina and a 5-star hotel. Additional projects include the Marassi Beach Clubhouse (exterior designs), the high density award winning Hillside Project (residential) and high -end residential projects in China. Ms. Axmann is a past member of Toast Master International where she held the office of Secretary and Vice President of Membership. She completed her course with an award In public speaking. 181 Innovation otive $vile 100 Iwina, calilornia 92617 p 949.861 4600 1 919.661.a601 www.j: mkpannw$.coin A R C 11 1 T E C 1U R E P L A N N I N G - U R B A N D l' S I G N Hokuli'a Is a world -class golf resort community located on the Big Island of Hawaii. 1ZMK Partners is providing planning and architecture services for the Phase II and Leasehold property areas. Blending the unique site and cultural characteristics with contextual "Island" architecture and community design concepts is a primary design ohlective, www')imyrarinets. cenl Irvine. California A H C H 1 1 F C f U R f Phoenix. Arizona Hmtolulu. Hawaii phone 006 545 2440 P I. A N N I N C LI ir H A N D f. S I G N Borrowing from the overall Nokuli'a (Star of Desire) theme, the Beach Club Village emphasizes connections to Navigation, capturing the spirit and honor of those before us who looked to the stars for guidance and purpose. Celebrating the natural connections and having••. an overall relaxed, elegant character are the r IN1 , primary principles of design for this Village. Most Importantly Is the emphasis on outdoor living. Taking cues from the natural features of Nokuli'a, the site planning and design of 5� the environmental features embraces organic 'rc forms and textures. The site design, grading concepts, view corridot programming, and architectural design all work comprehensively to provide an unparalleled living experience w vrw Izmkpar Ure;S. cam Irvine.. California Phoenix. Arizona Honolulu. Hawaii phone 808,545 1440 A R C H I T E C T U R E P I. A N N I N G 0 R 11 A N 11 E S I G N 183 Hualalai is located on the Kona (oast of Hawaii. Home to one of the world's finest resorts (the Four Seasons), Hualalai has established itself as the premier resort community. Working In collaboration with Edaw, JZMK Partners (led by Ron Krater) developed the residential and recreational master plan and site-speclfic plans for approximately 400 acres adjacent to the resort and existing golf course. Nw irmtpariners cum Irvine. Calilornta Phoenix. Mizona Honolulu, Hawaii phone roe 545,244C A R i; H I T E C T U R( P I A N N I N G IJ R B A N G E S I G N 184 Nestled between an expansive beachfront, a majestic coastal forest and a tranquil river delta, the village of Tinja is approximately 15 kilometers south of the Moroccan tourist capital of Tangier and close to Ibn Battuta International Airport. Its picturesque views of the Atlantic oceanfrontand access along a major coastal route combine withnearby natural features, such as a stretch o, f native forest, farmland, and an ecologically rich estuary to craft a premier destination location. The vision for Tinja is to create an active year-round new community attractive in its design, adaptive to its environment, and sustainable in its growth and development. It will Infuse high quality design, a luxurious lifestyle, and a sense of timelessness. Tinja provides the building block for a dynamic new town. Shops, restaurants and recreation centers will complement hotels, spa facilities, and residential neighborhoods consisting of approximately 2,700 dwellings of apartments, townhomes, riads and villas. Public gathering spaces will be the center of the community. A Town Square, Village Green and other parks create focal points around which Identifiable neighborhoods are established. A series of greenways and linear parks will link neighborhoods and amenities to the active vibrant zones of the community, or to the tranquil and relaxing offerings of the natural environment. 131 Innovation Drive 9uuo 100 IrYWa, California 92617 9 949.861. 4600 1 949.861.4501 vww.I 1"Partner4. com A R C H I T E C T U R E P I. A N N I N G. U R 8 A N D E S I G N 11111__ 185 131 In novelion Drive Swtp 100 kIlAt. C31401eia 92617 p 949.961,4000 A R C H I T E C T U R E F 1. A N N I N G Mnf tdr Finn Sports Club lw� 1 940A6I A601 ww w.jemkpariner A. tom U R B A N D E S I G N 186 AWARDS 2005 GOLD NUGGETS: "Best Detached Community of the Year" "Best community Site Plan 15 to 99 Acres" "Best Single Family Detached Home 3,001 to 3,300 SF" Belcara''s four distinctive floor plans span approximately 2,475 to 3,082 square feet and Include as many as five bedrooms and four and one-half baths. Their rich European heritage Is dramatized by private courtyards and loggias that create an irresistible Interplay between indoor and outdoor spaces. Each plan has its own distinguishing features: an Impressive. entry courtyard, a downstairs bedroom and a secludedmaster suite retreat in Residence One; a fully internalized courtyard and a downstairs master suite in Residence Two; side yard patios and a loggia extending to a detached bedroom and bath in Residence Three; and a convenient downstairs bedroom, an upstairs detached bedroom, a detached studio and a master -suite retreat In Residence Four. Belcara's prices range from $1.1 — 1.6 million. - 11i Innoval ion Dme sure 100 Uvina. Calilornia 91617 p 848. 861.4600 1940, 061. d 601 www. itmkpufnt'stom APCHITECTURE P I. A N N I N G U R B A N D ES I G N 187 The city of Al Ain, best known for Its many parks, palm groves and gardens, attracts visitors and residents alike who seek relief from a busier world. A short distance away from the cosmopolitan life of Abu Dhabi city, the At Ain Palace Hotel, a 240-room facility, will provide a serene environment in which to conduct business, relax with family and (trends and simply enjoy the beauty and tranquility of this exclusive oasis resort destination. Designed with special attention to detail, the Palace of At Ain incorporates several traditional elements of both the U.A.E. in general, and AI Ain specifically. The arrival procession begins at the Royal Rotunda and at the Entry Oasis for regular business guests. Each provides a stunning view of At Ain Palace. The quest enjoys a journey like no other, through dunes and oases to arriveat apalm-grove enclosed pone-cochere: the first of many magical experiences to come. The Royal Suites gate down onto the gardens and courtyards below. The grand reflection pool spreads tranquilly across the view ahead, in the distance, the gardens and their intricately placed pools and fountain carry. the eye to the Palace Golf Course. rat umavauon Wive >uue mu ovine. wurorma Stnv p I av aI—. A R C N I I E C t U R E P L A N N I N G U R B A N 0 E S I G N a y Q la r=e a �t {; � 1 t! t k A First floor Plan 131 Innovation o11ve suite 100 hwine. California 92611 p 949.861.4600 A P C H I I F G 1 11 R€ P 1, A N N I N G Nestled in the northwestern San Joaquin hills, the community of Shady Canyon is a collection of luxury custom homes specifically tailored to each individual residence. This custom residence was designed to create a sense of true traditional Andalusian style architecture. the home sits upon a 29,816 square foot parcel, which is surrounded by natural vegetation and wildlife. Particular emphasis was placed on the indoor/outdoor relationship by creating over 2,000 square feet of Interior entry courtyard surrounded by traditional balconies, wood burning fireplaces and French doors opening to the art gallery, all of which create a true sense of outdoor living while also maintaining the serenity of the natural surroundings. The design was influenced by the homeowner's priceless art collection, which is reflected in the long axial hallways and termination points for the display of paintings and sculptures. The exemplary quality of materials and detailing creates a true sophistication that is unparalleled. t 949. 961,4601 www.ja atti, ar fee, n.aom URBAN D F S I G N it. 189 The Zianisite plan illustrates the configuration of two seven-plex buildings to form a courtyard. The motorcourt forms the heart of two companion buildings and front door entries occur along the outer perimeters. A variety of plan forms are blended into the motorcourt configurations and the diversityof floorplan types widens the market audience. The floorplans consist of traditional two-story townhouses, carriage homes, flats, and three-story townhomes. A passageway between the two.seven-plexes allows entry into the motorcourt. Architecture Is critical in the motorcourt and a variety of primary and secondary roof shapes, In conjunction with projections and balconies, ensures a rich architectural statement. The three-story elements create vital undulation and movement, which is pivotal in replicating the Tuscan hilltop character. A variety of roof forms mixing gables, hips and sheds further intensifies the thematic content of the architecture. Other elements that lend credibiiityto the aesthetic statement Include the thickened wood trim of the windows, the balconies, and the variety of different window forms. In recent years it has become quite desirable to have floor plans designed with a first level master suite, Ziani boasts three out of seven floor plans with the master suite on the ground floor. 131 Innovation Drive suite 100 11090, Cauio,nla 92517 p 949,861.4600 1 949,861. a 601 www.jxmkpatlners,cum A R C N I T I[ C I U R E 1) 1 A N N I N G it R 6 A N D E S I G N Ia 190 Standard Pacific Homes wanted to provide the residents of its upscale seniors community with a facility that captures the spirit of early San Clemente, while providing a variety of contemporary uses. The indoor uses include a lobby, reception area, offices, multipurpose room, Mitten,media lounge, conference room, card room, exercise room, locker rooms, and a billiards room. The courtyard becomes the focal point of the design and also provides additional outdoor programmed uses. The outdoor uses include fireplace and bar, pool and spa, bocce ball, and putting greens. 191 InnOYaHOa Drive suite 100 Irvine, C81091013 92612 P 949.861 4600 r 949,861_4601 www.lxmkgariaers.com A P C H I t E C r U R E P I. A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I (� N ri.._ 191 The Green lantern Inn is a 23-room boutique hotel located on a prominent bluff overlooking the Dana Point Harbor and the Pacific Ocean. The architecture and Ian dsca ping incorporate casual country Mediterranean in fluences. All of the guestrooms have different plans and deck spares. There are numerous outdoor rooms and terrace spaces at the bluff edge, a large great room/lobby with a fireplace in the main Interior space, with a mezzaninelibrary and view deck that is enjoyed by all guests. 131 Innovalion Drive Sni1e 100 Irvine. caliiornia 92617 p D49.861,4600 A R C 11 1 1 E C 'Ili R£ P I A N N I. N G 1949. 861. 4 60 1 wnw.jtmkpartnela. com fl R H A N Q E S 1 G N ri 192 The Headlands property a 70 Room Boutique Hotel with a unique combination of dramatic coastal bluffs, wide sandybeaches, rolling hillsides, elevated plateaus, and cascading terraced slopes, all joining together at the edge of the Pacific Ocean. The design Intent is to create a destination community that reflects the grandeur of this beautiful setting by identifying the appropriate styles, materials, shapes, textures and colors of Its design palette. The Headland's site planning receives its inspiration from the existing terrain. Public and private areas are interwoven with ornamental and indigenous landscaping, public trails and coastal access paths, scenic overlooks, parks, open space and ocean views. The outdoor lifestyle is reinforced in the pedestrian orientation which pervades the design. The natural setting is further emphasized through thescale and use of materials which reflect nature — natural wood, stone, tile and other appropriate elements., ••. •. P' + •t 121 Innovation D111e Sale 100 ovine. Caldmnla 92617 p 949.86L,1600 194 9. 861. C 601 xnw.i<mk0anne,S Coon A R C 11 1 1 E C. T 0 R t P L A N N I N G k R H A N 11 f S I G N 193 Sited on the North Mediterranean Sea in Sidi Abdel Rahman, Egypt, the Marassi Beach Club provides a premier lifestyle and recreational amenity to help define the Marassi Resort master planned community. The elegance ofMediterranean architecture using a stucco finish with color, stone and precast accents is influenced by Arabic architectural details, such as parapets, horseshoe and pointed arches to highlight the building form. The plan is designed to take advantage of views to the Mediterranean Sea by opening the social gathering areas to the outdoors, while adhering to sustainable building practices and maintaining environmental sensitivity to this important site just east of Alexandria. A focal arcade that frames the view to the sea sets up a dramatic sequence of experiential events as you pass through the view portal, down the ceremonial stairs to the lower terrace and beach areas beyond. 191 1n00vaua0 DNve Suite too Ilvlue. Califatma 91617 9 949.861A600 194 9.861.a 601 v NW'j1MkP3nne1s'"M A R C If I T E C T Ii ft E P I. A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I C, N ,r 194 r 0111101131C The property Is bound on all sides by roadways, Xian Ling Avenue to the south Is the regional street connecting the site to Nanjing's Eentral Business District. Across Xian Ling is a large open space preserve with significant hills and picturesque views. The hill on thenorthwest corner gives the property a unique Identity and beauty. At the center of the plan a community clubhouse is proposed. The recreational dub is envisioned to be a key architectural piece within the community. Anticipated uses within the club may include: Indoor pool, badminton, restaurant, community rooms for events, library, small theatre, cafe, Shops, and showroom. 131 Innovation Diive suite 100 Inure. Calitonna 92611 p 94 9.961. 4600 1 9e 0.66 A 6 0 1 wwwj nikpatinerr com A R C It I 1 II; l U R E P L A N N I N G U R E A N D E S I G N 1 195 The Sports Club, along with the Golf Clubhouse, in the City of Parkland will act as the primary hub for this 830-acre residential golf course community. The Sports Club will serve over 800 members, whose average household income is over $120,000 a year. The Sports Club's basic function is to provide the residents with a family oriented community center, which offers facilities for health and fitness, social gatherings and recreation. The Sports Club will feature diverse amenities such as spas and saunas, treatment rooms, banquet rooms, main and private dining rooms, and a tennis pro shop linked to 11 tennis courts including a stadium court, outdoor pools with a tiki bar and a kid's activity area. An events lawn will be used as an outdoor gathering space, which can be tented when necessary. The architecture is meant to convey a sense of an old Florida estate, from its paved motor court and classical proportions and details to its choice of finish materials (smooth stucco plaster and weathered clay tiles). A strong relationship exists between the indoor and outdoor spaces through the sequence of spaces generated by design i4, mnoaauon unve Suite 100 I(VIAt, Cali7olni4l 91617 p 949,961.. 4600 1 949.961.x6 o7 x W.11,.kpuloeie"rom A R C H I I C 1 0 R f P 1, A N N I N G It R R A N N F S 1 6 N 1 sb WHAT IS GREEN BUILDING? Green building Involves designing and building homes to be energy and resource efficient and healthy for occupants. Compared to traditional design and construction, green buildings are made to have less of an impact on file environment. Generally, the homes useless energy, water, natural resources, and provide less exposure to mold, mildew and other indoor toxins. INTRODUCTION TO GREEN RATING SYSTEMS LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a green rating system for the design, construction, and operation of a green building. LEED offers architects, developers, constructors and homeowners an explicit and credible list of principles that may be applied to a variety ofprojects, Build It Green Build it Green is a non-profit professional organlYknijon that promotes healthy, energy and resource efficient buildings inhogornia. some of the services provided by the organs Lion -Include: ofessional e training; workshops; green hotf irs; consumer kpketing; and green building program developInt,fpr local gq�ernments. Build It Green also offers greed. buiidiQ�g ujtlel!des+„ and a rating system that rates homes on eneijit�fi�ihh0,Yesdurce and -water conservation, indoor air quality, and community. Developer Meet consumer demand for green and energy efficient homes Many homebuyers are willing to pay more for these products Developers that provide these amenities are given an edge on their competition Increased marketability Expedited permit review for local building permits Lower inspection fees (in select areas) State green building Hxentives (tax credits for developers) Homeowner • financial. savings • Improve the indoor air quality and occupant's health • Less maintenance • Greater durability May qualify for special 'green' financing • Helping the environment • Higher resale value • More comfortable environment Sources: www.usgb(.org www.builditgreen.org Iat Innovation Drive mile 100 Irvine, California 99611 p 949.861,4600 1 949, 861A 601 www'prexpanne's corn A R C H I T E C T U R E P L A N N, N G U R B A N D E S I G N .41 197 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF THE YEAR - ATTACHED PRODUCT IN AN URBAN SETTING" PCBC/Builder Magazine Vlarmington Homes Concerto Lofts - Los Angeles, (A 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF THE YEAR - ATTACHED PRODUCT IN AN URBAN SETIING" PCBC/Builder Magazine Willlom Lyon Homes 360 - Hawthorne, (A 2011, GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF THE YEAR - ATTACHED PRODUCT WITHIN A SUBURBAN SETTING" PCBC/Builder Magazine Brookfield Homes Coronado - tang Beach, CA 2010 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "BEST CUSTOM HOME - UNDER 5,000 50. FT" PCBC/Builder Magazine JDH Construction Sunset Beach House - Sunset Beach Oahu, HI 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT " BEST PUBLIC/PRIVATE SPECIAL USE FACILITY" PCBC/THE PREMIER BUILDING SHOW Brookfield Homes Keiki 0 Ka'Aina - Oahu, HI 191 Innovaliaa Drive Suite 100 A R C H I T E C T U R E 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "BEST ATTACHED HOUSING PROJECT- UNDER 18 DU/ACRE" P(BC/The Premier Building Show Senderro (ansuuclion Services The Hillside - Austin, T% 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "BEST SINGLE FAMILY DETTACHED HOME - OVER 4,000 SOFT" PCBC/The Premier Building Show Standard Pacific Homes The Tides- Residence Three - Newport Coast, CA 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "BEST ATTACHED HOUSING PROJECT-18 TO 40 OU/A(RE" PCBC/Premier Building Show Brookfield Homes Southland Belcourt at Edenglen - Ontario, CA 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "SUSTAINABLE BUILT GREEN HOME" PCBC/The Premier Building Show JDH Construction Sunset Beach House - Sunset Beach Oahu, HI 2008 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT - "ATTACHED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF THE YEAR" PCBC/THE PREMIER BUILDING SHOW Brookfield Homes Southland Belcourt at Edenglen - Ontario, (A Irvine, California 92617 p 949.861.4600 1 949.861.460! www.j2mkpartners.com P L A N N I N G U R B A N D E S I G N n 198 2011 GOLD NUGGET GRAND AWARD "RESIDENTIAL PROJECT OF THE YEAR" PCB(/Builder Magazine William Lyon Homes 360 - Hawthorne, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET GRAND AWARD "IINFIIL - RE -DEVELOPMENT OR REHAB SITE PLAN UP TO S ACRES' PCRC/Builder Magazine William Lyon Homes 360 - Hawthorne, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET GRAND AWARD "OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL BUILDING" PCBC/Builder Magazine J.H. Snyder Noho - North Hollywood, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "OFFICE/PROFESSIONAI. BUILDING" PCBC/Builder Magazine 1.H,Snyder Noho - North Hollywood, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "AFFORDABLE PROJECT - UNDER 30 OU/ACRE" PCBC/Builder Magazine Brookfield Homes Coronado - Long Beach, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT 'MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT - UP TO 3 STORIES (FOR SALE OR RENT)" P(BC/Builder Magazine Brookfield Homes Coronado - Long Beach, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT -UP TO 3 STORIES (FOR SALE OR RENT)" PCRC/Builder Magazine William tyon Homes 360 - Hawthorne, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGETAWARD OF MERIT "MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT - 4 TO 6 STORIES (FOR SALE OR RENT)" PCOC/Builder Magazine Warmington Homes Concerto Lofts - Los Angeles, CA 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "INFILL, RE -DEVELOPMENT OR REHAB SITE PLAN (UP TO 5 ACRES)" PCBC/Builder Magazine William Lyon Homes 360 - Hawthorne, (A 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT "INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL" PCBC/Builder Magazine EMAAR Marassi Reach Club - Sidi Abdel Rahman, Egypt 2011 GOLD NUGGET AWARD OF MERIT 'INTERNATIONAL ON THE BOARDS SITE PLAN' P(RC/Builder Magazine Yasser Nabil Mivida - Egypt 131 Innovation Drive Suite 100 Irvine, California 9261i n 049$61.4600 A R C H I T E C T U R E P L A N N) N G 1949.661.4601 www.izmkp3,(aets.com U R B A N D E 5 1 G N 1r. 199 Latham & Watkins LLP is in a international law firm and an industry leader in handling development, redevelopment, and construction projects encompassing every real estate asset class. Our lawyers bring to the table an unparalleled ability to navigate through the maze of land use, environmental, and permitting requirements while at the same time mastering the transactional nuances necessary to address the needs of property owners, governmental agencies, lenders, and tenants. We have worked on many of the most significant projects in California and throughout the United States, including the following: Representative Experience Includes: • Dlsneyland.Resort expansion negotiating one of the largest public -private partnership projects in the U.S., the US $3 billion . After years of complex negotiations, Latham attorneys won milestone approvals by the Anaheim City Council for the Disneyland Resort Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a number of plans for the new 486-acre California Adventure theme park. Los Angeles Arena Holdings LLC concerning land use and entitlement approvals for LA Live!, a sports and entertainment district located adjacent to the STAPLES Center and the Los Angeles Convention Center. Latham helped defeat challenges to the Installation of the previously approved signage which is critical to the development of the Convention Center Hotel and LA Live!, which realized long held goals of the City and the Redevelopment Agency to construct a state-of-the-art hotel complement the Convention Center. The project also includes a state-of-the-art movie theatre for Regal Cinemas, 224 residential units, the 7,100-seat Nokia Theater, and more than 520,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and entertainment uses with an ESPN Zone and broadcasting facility and a museum showcasing the Grammy Awards. LA Live! is part of the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District Specific Plan, which was prepared and negotiated by Latham, Los Angeles Arena Holdings LLC and the City of Los Angeles in 2001 to create a sports and entertainment district to support the Convention Center and Staples Center and revitalize Downtown Los Angeles. • Anschutz Entertainment Group in the development of a 54-story mixed -use tower and convention center, including JW Marriott Hotel, Ritz Carlton Hotel, and over 220 luxury condominiums. The representation has included the formation of various ownership entities, obtaining various entitlements and land use approvals, and senior and mezzanine construction financing. • Majestic Realty Company in the development of 600 acres of land for commercial use, Including 4.8 million square feet of built space which would include a National Football League stadium with practice fields and training facilities in the City of Industry, California. Latham represents Majestic in the leasing, financing and permitting and litigation in the project, which received a specific approval from the California State Assembly in its 2009 special session to allow it to start construction on an expedited schedule. • The owner of the "Bakersfield Commons" project in all aspects of entitlement and land use in connection with the development of two million square feet of retail and commercial space and 426 residences spread across 255 acres of former oil production land. .fV. 200 • The developers of Playa Vista, an $8 billion project involving over 1,000 acres, including a first phase of 3,250 homes and 3.2 million square feet of studio and office space and a second phase of over 9,000 residential units, over two million square feet of office space, 560,000 square feet of retail space and 750 hotel rooms. • Paramount Pictures Corporation in connection with its proposed Master Plan for the Paramount Studios site in Hollywood, including redevelopment of up to 1,385,700 square feet of studio -related uses, stage space, production and general office space, support facilities, and retail space. • Loyola Marymount University with respect to the entitlement and development of a Master Plan, replacing one million square feet of buildings with two million square feet of sustainable and state-of-the-art academic, residential, and athletic facilities • G.H. Palmer in connection with obtaining all environmental and land use approvals for the Lorenzo Project — a $250 million mixed -use, transit -oriented development that includes over 1,000 residential units. • Westfield Corporation in the entitlement and development of The Village at Westfield Topanga, which will be an approximately 1,800,000 square foot mixed -use development. • Catelius Development Corporation in connection with the development of its mixed - use project near Union Station in Los Angeles, including construction of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority headquarters. • J. Paul Getty Trust in connection with all land use approvals for the $1 billion Getty Center In Brentwood, California. • Trammell Crow Company with respect to the redevelopment of the 14-acre ABC Entertainment Center, including demolition of office towers and the construction of a 780,000 square feet building. • NBC Universal in connection with the approval of a long-term master plan for its 391- acre Universal Studios site in Los Angeles, California, including 2,900 residential units, a 500-room hotel, and approximately 1.2 million square feet of new studio -related theme park and office uses. • Lowe Enterprises and various affiliates in connection with development, financing and other matters relating to Terranea Resort in Rancho Palos Verdes, California.' • KSL Resorts in connection with various management, financing and other matters relating to La Quinta Resort & Spa in La Quinta, California.` • Lowe Enterprises and Destination Hotels & Resorts in connection with acquisition, development, management and financing of The Resort at Squaw Creek at Lake Tahoe, California.' • Lowe Enterprises and Destination Hotels & Resorts In connection with acquisition, development, fractional interest program and formation of joint venture relating to the resort known as Stowe Mountain Lodge in Stowe, Vermont. • Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (NYSE: SHO) in connection with acquisition, financing and subsequent sale of the Royal Palm Resort in Miami, Florida. • Worked on the financing or development for numerous hotels, resorts and casinos throughout the world, including Wynn Resort in Las Vegas, French Lick Resort & Casino in Indiana, Red Hawk Casino in California as well as a number of Native American Indian Casinos, •Werner handle/ ht' one or more Lm/uon lawyers prior !o joining rhe,firm. 202 ATTACHMENT 2 Rq i Q E V ® U E (/) (\\] c J c � ca � O 203 LL O O O �O tp N O Q O O m m ry o� m o m o u NI N N W V h 01 a' N C 7 N N N N tp N O f C 7 N 'L W a 'N C N O H A A o d W U U V N m m — l7 m as Q O O O Q O Q .LLN.. o v a « o vi o 16 m N r LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O C 0 C 0 N N O O N pp 'i V m N N a Y a a � O D' a O 2 C N w l7 C 0 C_ IQ Y N d O L O F 1a N O « E c V = 0 0 m u v c z jz o E c 2 m Y a l7 0 x E a -aa ` O N C p a K O a c o O � @ m 204 m ao ni m m m q r H A m N d N C q N V1 O1 l0 F m m � w o o Y W q d c m a a 0 W W O rl q L q L � d d O N E °o z a 0 x c q w O o - o Y V1 d F y C N O N Y L � q y _ o w E iv c c U= O O V j c 0 a E c a= m °1 E s oS E v O o a v c h q q o m m L c O "G 0 w u m m �1A U V) V O W d y O W � k n L M lD Q = V oC oa F a3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M1 � Y W �F ee e L a y p� d a o a r x w a m � 9 W a s o s s 0 F a° a° a o a o g � ,`� W 0 0 206 v 0 W U 0 CL a o m m o m m$ o 0 0 �n m m c o N fi n N G 0 0 c ipn O u 1/1 N N 8 N $^ n eo 0 0 0 0 $^ g N N M o m o 0 0 0 0 $ 0 N N T a i z z z z 0 u °o o °o S o u a° p°o C] x a O G °o 0 G m o: tt o a a tt u 0¢ tUi CO G S Q O n O m X m umi S y n c n N X n e n ti m ry N O � N n N N N M N T N m C m .D N .Pi y N Vni N N N N N N e0i N N H N O O p O 0 N N O ry N yrvj N s m m m m m m z i z 2 z z O E o E E. 0 0 a °o p rc u c C m m O a O r d y Q O V O oa Y a U 0 Y Yi O O O O a rc V ry � N O •i O� g O C p O O X G O N C O b C O O n o 0 0 O O 0 0 o e N N N M a m e ry ti } n N N N N p jy N N t m C Y 2 2 2 Z Z Z o E E E E E m o 0 o a o o u v L a v L n a L d a a O Q O x a O V O ab x U 0 Pu Y U O O O 9 C Y ¢ u O Q sF- m _ c 0 N m 4 i N / m X H 0 N cu Q rW L E 0 U 0 Q% U .O L J av V o.« - z oy� goR ice\ ww aJay« My 1� 0 1 ro t t x Ln �sa 0 r � ca s "g ®®®OQOoO®BBe 00®BBe ���. 208 �l x in � � b ► � ti dam., m , g >, OOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAQ0. Z Q r J as 2 w G o R LUN J Q f t!�J-Y•�� >Q f C V! z U N o ,t 209 ATTACHMENT 3 Lewis Land Developers, LLC 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Upland, California 91785 Telephone: (909) 946-7515 / Fax: (909) 931-5510 www.Icwisop.com October 10, 2012 Mrs. Debbie Powell Economic Development / Housing Manager City Manager's Office City of La Quinta dpowelI(o)la-guinta.org (760) 777-7073 Dear Mrs. Powell, The Lewis Group of Companies has been building and developing master planned communities, rental communities, and shopping centers for over five decades. Founded in 1955 by Ralph and Goldy Lewis, we've evolved into one of the most active development companies in the West, all while continuing to be managed by the second and third generations of the Lewis family. We pride ourselves on the reputations we have forged in each of the jurisdictions we have worked in, and we continue the tradition of quality, integrity and stability which is of paramount importance to the Lewis family. Lewis is the largest real estate development company in the Inland Empire and is one of the nation's largest, privately -held real estate development firms. Our half -century experience in the real estate industry has earned us what we call "The Lewis Difference". Collectively, our stability, financial strength, integrity, commitment to quality and innovative approach will enable Lewis to enhance the value of Silver Rock more than any other real estate development company. Many of the Lewis Differences are set forth below: Largest Developer: Lewis is the largest developer and largest master planned community developer in the Inland Empire. Lewis has built more homes in the Inland Empire than any other builder. We built our first home in the Inland Empire in the 1950's. Most Active Developer: Lewis is the most active developer in the Inland Empire. Some of our current development projects include: University Village, a 160 acre mixed -use planned community in Loma Linda; the National Orange Show, a 128 acre mixed -use retail, industrial and office development in San Bernardino; The Villages of Lakeview, a 3,000 acre mixed -use master planned community in Lakeview (unincorporated Riverside County); Renaissance, a 600 210 Silver Rock — La Quinta acre mixed -use planned community in Rialto; The Arboretum, a 550 acre mixed - use planned community in Fontana; Shady Trails, a 200 acre residential planned community; Sierra Business Park, a 4.OMM sf Industrial complex in Fontana; Victoria Gardens, a 150 acre mixed -use Regional Mall in Rancho Cucamonga; Terra Vista, a 1,300 acre mixed -use planned community in Rancho Cucamonga; Park Place, a 350 acre residential planned community in Ontario; Parkside, a 250 acre residential planned community in Ontario; and The Preserve at Chino, a 1,200 acre mixed -use master planned community in Chino. The above list only includes a portion of the Lewis' development projects in the Inland Empire. 3. Local Experience: Our local development experience, strong relationships, financial resources and long term vision has allowed Lewis to develop more Real Estate in the Inland Empire than any other Developer. 4. A 57 Year Old Company: Lewis has 57 continuous years of development experience in the Inland Empire; we have the local knowledge and relationships to help entitle and develop projects quickly. 5. Hands—on Lewis Involvement: Richard Lewis will be personally involved in community relations and outreach and is a resident of La Quinta. Randall Lewis will have a hands-on, leadership role in any land planning, entitlements, and community outreach campaign. In addition, the other members of the Lewis family will have a hands-on role in Silver Rock. 6. Changed the Face of Development in the Inland Empire: Over the past five decades, Lewis has positively changed the face of the West with over 24,000 acres of land developed —representing more than 56,000 single family residences, 9,000 apartment homes, and over 11 million sq. ft of retail, office and industrial space. 7. Local Knowledge: Lewis brings a strong local market knowledge and community commitment to the project. 8. Financial Stability: Lewis is self -financed and maintains over 1.7 billion dollars in assets. This financial strength allows our company to move quickly and affords us greater flexibility when structuring land transaction and ventures. 9. The Lewis Name: The "Lewis' name has great brand name recognition within the community. 10. Expertise: Lewis has developed numerous shopping centers, rental communities, and master planned communities in the Inland Empire and possesses the experience and expertise necessary to complete Silver Rock. 11. Competition: The nature of this project will not compete with any of the Lewis holdings and Silver Rock would be a fantastic addition to our project portfolio. Page 2 of 3 211 Silver Rock — La Quinta 12.Over 400 Employees: The Lewis team of over 420 dedicated and experienced professionals, guided by a second and third -generation, personal involvement, hands-on, and day-to-day Lewis management team, will be responsible for making Silver Rock a reality. 13. Recoanition: The Lewis family has been recognized by members of the United States Congress, California State Senate, California State Assembly and members of local government for outstanding community involvement and contributions. Our local development experience, strong local relationships, financial resources and long-term vision has allowed'Lewis to develop more real estate in the Inland Empire than any other developer. We possess the experience and expertise necessary to complete Silver Rock in the most financially successful manner. In order to make Silver Rock a success for the community of La Quinta, we believe the best way to approach the project is with a tremendous amount of creativeness and flexibility, as projects today encounter numerous obstacles and challenges. Lewis would propose to be the master developer, coordinating and working in conjunction with the City to implement the current Silver Rock Specific Plan. As the master developer, Lewis would seek to partner with a top -tier hospitality development company in order to provide the City with the vision it desires and the best possible outcome for the community and residents of La Quints. Lewis would focus its efforts on any retail or residential component of the vision. We look forward to beginning a mutually beneficial relationship with you, your City Council and most importantly, the members of the La Quinta community. We hope to continue discussions with you on how collectively we can make Silver Rock a very special place for the City of La Quinta. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, od Kyl . eichert The Lewis Companies (909) 946-7594 Page 3 of 3 M. . 212 Lewis Group OF Companies 11A:il - i, ! 1 l E S t, N f( F LJ H ) V ON 11 '1[1- � "'� 11 -11 , i � , I u: , TRUSTED PERFORMANCE SINCE 1955 It 213 VALLEY wnGP.m MNu INLAND m ,yy i.Y ��'��� Bulletin I(u M L bW LA e vd Nl sal Plki�n v,uuaMvm�e �. mm mnxP lw, v wef I,u4 'pia�Uf3 _,.,., u«�.�amrz:c,rr r ra flw 1!5.1`u..sw .:c�•.n.. EDITORIAL ....................... _......... Lewises built, then gave back to communities gw people have left as big a mark on the Inland Valley as Coldy Lewis did. And a very personal mark it was. In a sense, there's a little bit of Goldy inside the homes of tens of thousands of Inland Valley families. Mrs. Lewis, who died Tuesday at 84, was the matriarch and co -Founder of Lewis Homes, the family business that built more than 60,000 houses and apartments in 7bereS aPretty four states since starting good chance, if f with a Claremont tract in you're Yeading 1955. If anyone can be said to have built the Inland this, that YOU Valley, it would be the have lived in a Lai whose company — Lewis bole which switched in 1999 from home building to developing SboQped at R planned communities and Leans Centel', or commercial and industrial used a Lewis- pm'ojedis and is known as the supported civic Lewis Group of Companies — is now ran by the late Ralph facility- and Goldy Lewis' four sons. —hiished March 16, 2006 in the All who knew her and worked with her credit Mre. Lewis for making Lewis -built homes well t her suited to family life -She wouldnt be comfortableafor a build a o live g a family to live in, so she insisted on pantries, bigger closets, good appliances and other touches long before such amenities became popular. She wanted her projects to be "livable communities," complete with schools, parks and green space, before that became a buzzword. The Lewises didnt just build communities, they gave back to them. The Lawns Family Playhouse at Victoria Gardens will open this summer. The Goldy S. Lewis Community Center was dedicated in Rancho Cucamonga s Central Park last year. There's a Lewis Park in Rancho Cucamonga and another in Claremont. Pomona has The Golds, and Ralph Lewis Education Center at Temple Beth Israel. Ontario has the Ralph & Goldy Lewis Library at Colony High School. In fact, themes a pretty good chance, if you're reading this, that you have lived in a Lewis house, shopped at a Lewis center, or used a Lewis -supported civic facility. And that's quite a legacy. Bulletin opinion Section >cmy monn,ed wuh...... nd,b N-M WII, 0.lh eullam. The Lewis 6rupp of Companies Executive Committee Richard A. Lewis • Robert E. Lewis • Roger G. Lewis • l John M. Goodman • Jennifer A: Lewis 0 David L. Linden 0 Leon C. A History of Accomplishment From 1055 Yestertlay... A leading Developer In Me Westero States l r set ,lk k��a la's , As the Lewis Group of Companies begins its 57th year, £ a '' --' many long -tenured employees under the direction of a second and third generation management team continue the tradition of quality, integrity and stability that was of paramount importance to Ralph and Goldy Lewis when they founded their home building firm in Claremont in 1955. Strict adherence to this philosophy has resulted in the development of more than 56,000 homes, 9,000 apartments and 14 million square feet of retail, office, and industrial space. Since 1955, the Lewis organization has developed new communities in California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah totaling in excess of 25,000 acres. In 1999, the Lewis family sold a portion of its business, Lewis Homes, to Kaufman and Broad (KB Home), creating the largest homebuilder in the United States at that time. Today And Tomorrow... Greater Versatility as The Lewis Group Of Companies The Lewis Group of Companies continues today as one of the nation's largest privately held real estate development companies. The Lewis Group focuses on developing mixed -use planned communities and residential subdivisions in California and Nevada, as well as building and owning rental communities, shopping centers, office parks, and industrial buildings. For sale homes built ..................... 56,770 Apartments built ........................ 9,400 Retail, Office, Industrial developed........'. 14,000,000 sq. ft Land developed ......................... 25,000 acres Lots developed and sold to others .......... 17,700 Apartments Owned and Managed......... 7,950 units Investment Property Owned and Managed.. 5,000,000 sq. ft Residential Land Owned or Controlled..... 10,500 acres (development potential) ................. (approx. 44,000 dwelling units) Apartment Land Owned or Controlled..... 235 acres (development potential) ................. 4,400 units Retail Land Owned or Controlled......... 600 acres (development potential) ................. (approx. 6.000,000 sq.. ft.) Office and Industrial Land Owned or Controlled .......................... 600 acres (development potential) ................. 11,000,000 sq. ft. Employees. : ........................... 425 All numbers are approximate as of date of publication and include Joint ventures & partnerships. 1 215 Planned Communities that Create Value reating new master planned communities is far more than a business for Lewis Community Developers, a member of the Lewis Group of Companies. It is a passion. Lewis is dedicated to creating communities that address the highest aspirations of the people who live within them. Quality and vision go hand in hand throughout the planning and development process. Understanding that open space equals peace of mind, parks promote healthful living and recreation centers kindle community spirit, Lewis creates key amenities early in the development process. Assuring A Desirahle lifestyle ends Community Developers designs communities that foster a lifestyle that benefits its residents today and tomorrow. Featuring The Preserve at Chino, Chino, CA everything from parks and amenities that include both indoor and outdoor recreation to bright new schools and abundant shopping nearby, Lewis communities create a friendly hometown environment and the convenience that today's families appreciate. Homebuyers also appreciate the quality and diversity of homes by premier homebuilders, while r 216 planning is carefully crafted to contribute gg , enduring value to its residents. Advantages include new roads and efficient traffic strategies, water conservation programs, and state-of-the-art connectivity which is a must for life today. Mi'p Lewis Community Developers also understands and appreciates that a new community becomes part of the legacy of a city or a region, establishing a a, foundation for ongoing f' . s traditions, forging channels of economic growth and tax ' _ •sr revenue, and enhancing the city's E 1 reputation and viability. Lewis collaborates with local municipalities to assure that the communities we develop complement their vision. Shady Trails, Fammna, CA Stewards of the Environment [riving to be stewards of the land and visionaries, Lewis Community Developers guides the creation of enduring environments that promote a natural balance, preserve biological diversity, and protect valued natural resources. As new priorities for sustainability emerge, Lewis continues to define better strategies, designs, and technologies that demonstrate respect for the natural world and its resources. As we see it, real solutions are those that benefit the land and communities ... now and for generations yet to come. Sierra Lakes, Fontana, CA �. 217 { t: el} �3�i 3. � `, `s!� i€,".' t ,r .�� �i' € 'El• 'i'E !11€ %i it flj �'',.. Lewis Community Developers has either *The Arboretum, Fontana, CA - 550 acres, developed or is developing these major planned 3,800 homes communities, residential subdivisions and mixed -use Sierra Crest, Fontana, CA - 76 acres, 450 homes, parks projects in California and Nevada: *Pinnacle Hills, Fontana, CA - 35 acres, 118 homes Terra Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA - 1,340 acres, over 8,000 homes and apartments, schools, parks, shopping centers, office parks, and a medical center *Victoria Gardens, Rancho Cucamonga, CA - 150 acres, approximately 300 homes, and a 1.3 million square foot regional lifestyle center Harvest, Rancho Cucamonga, CA - 20 acres, 119 homes, recreation center *Etiwanda Estates, Rancho Cucamonga, CA - 10 acres, 33 homes Sierra Lakes, Fontana, CA - 700 acres, 1,850 homes surrounding an 18-hole championship golf course and clubhouse, 62 acres of retail and a 20 acre park Summit Heights, Fontana, CA - 300 acres, 900 homes, and 28 acres of retail Citrus Heights, Fontana, CA - 110 acres, 480 homes Shady Trails, Fontana, CA - 210 acres, over 1,100 *Renaissance, Rialto, CA - 556 acres, 1,750 homes, parks, school and 300 acres of retail, office and industrial land The Preserve at Chino, Chino, CA - 1,125 acres encompassing more than 7,800 homes and apartments, schools, parks, recreation centers and 25 acres of commercial *Chino Airport, Chino, CA - 1,097 acre mixed use project being developed with County of San Bernardino Parkside, Ontario, CA - 230 acres, 1,950 homes, recreation center, a park and 12 acres of retail *Park Place, Ontario, CA - 287 acres, 1,250 homes, recreation center, school, and a park Upland Crossing, Upland, CA - 30 acres, 350 homes, and recreation center Diamond Bar Village, Diamond Bar, CA - 71 acres, 180 homes and 13 acres of retail Diamond Bar South Point, Diamond Bar, CA - homes, parks and a recreation center 30 acres, 99 homes The PreseOe at Chinn, Chinn, CA Shady Traits, Fonrana, CA The Enclave at Eastvale, Riverside County, CA, 112 acres, 490 homes, recreation area, and 11 acres of retail Prado, Riverside County, CA'- 20 acres, 224 homes and a recreation center Villages of Lakeview, Riverside County, CA - 2,800 acres, 11,150 homes, schools, parks, recreation centers, 1,000 acres of conserved habitat and 50 acres of retail and office uses *Harmony, Highland, CA - 1,658 acres, 3,600 homes and commercial being developed for the County of Orange *Serrano Summit, Lake Forest, CA - 99 acres, 608 homes, recreation and civic uses being developed for the Irvine Ranch Water District National Orange Show, San Bernardino, CA - 143 acre mixed use development *Centennial, Tejon Ranch, L.A. County, CA - 11,700 acres, over 22,000 homes and apartments,' schools, parks, a lake, and over 950 acres of retail, office and industrial land Creekside Natomas, Sacramento, CA 233 acres, over 1,500 homes and apartments, schools, parks, and 28 acres of retail Villages of Fairfield, Fairfield, CA - 400 acres, over 2,300 homes, schools, parks, and 13 acres of retail Del Rio Hills, Rio Vista, CA — 500 acres, 2,200 homes, parks, schools and retail Lincoln Ranch, Lincoln, CA — 500 acres, over 2,400 homes and apartments, parks, schools and retail **Waegell Property - The Arboretum, Rancho Cordova, CA - 1,400 acres, over 5,000 homes and apartments and retail Parkshore, Folsom, CA - 33 acres, 300 homes, adjacent to light rail Jepson Prairie, Vacaville, CA - 235 acres, 1,200 homes and a 10 acre retail center *Mather South, Sacramento County, CA - 700 acres, 2,000 homes, educational and recreation uses Heritage Oaks East, Wheatland, CA - 152 acres, 498 homes, neighborhood parks and retail The Orchards, Las Vegas, NV - 600 acres, 4,000 homes and apartments, schools, a park, and retail space The Villages at North Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV - 90 acres, 507 homes Silverado Ranch, Las Vegas, NV - 44 acres, mixed use project including homes, apartments and retail Curti/Caramella Ranches, Reno, NV - 264 acres, 700 homes and 88 acres of mixed use Curti Ranch, Reno, NV - 175 acres, 570homes Somersett, Reno, NV - 21 acres, 100 homes *Damonte Ranch, Reno, NV - 1,750 acres, 5,600 homes and apartments, and 277 acres of retail and industrial land -joint Venture --Contract Participation Tema Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA .p 219 Rental Communities of Distinctive Quality Lewis Apartment Communities, a member of the Lewis Group of Companies, is a leader in the development and management of rental communities in key areas of California and Nevada. The Lewis Group has developed more than 9,000 rental homes to date. Of this total, more than 8,000 remain company -owned. New rental communities are under development or in planning in Chino, Rancho Cucamonga and Riverside County in California as well as Las Vegas and Reno in Nevada. The Lewis Group typically retains ownership of the rental communities they develop. As a result, "a little extra" goes into each community. In-house management keeps Lewis representatives accessible to residents, which results in closer ties and a more appealing, resident -friendly atmosphere. This arrangement also ensures the preservation of high standards of quality and enhances the investment value of the property. Homecoming at Eastnale, Eastoale, CA Antelope Ridge, Sacramento, CA Management Expertise he Lewis Group of Companies manages its entire portfolio of investment properties and has been doing so for more than 30 years. A staff of 265 with offices in Upland, Sacramento, Las Vegas, and Reno manages the Lewis Group's portfolio of single family and rental homes, condominiums, office and industrial parks, and shopping centers. ewis Apartment Communities has been ASWIFI�111, awarded the prestigious National Multifamily Customer Service Award for Excellence for four consecutive years (2007.2010) by CEL & Associates, the nation's largest surveyor of resident satisfaction within the apartment industry. This award recognizes Lewis Apartment Communities for having the best management performance and customer service in the Country amongst manage- ment companies in the same size range. Mi 220 In Tune With bdayl Lifestyles ecognizing shifting demographic patterns and lifestyle changes, Lewis -developed communities often provide specialized amenities attuned to contemporary needs. These include executive business centers, state-of-the-art fitness centers, clubhouses with kitchens and entertaining areas, lush greenbelts, and inviting swimming pools and spas. Cryswl Cove Apamesents, ids Vegas, NV On a more personal level, a full-time Activities Director coordinates programs expressly designed to enrich the lives of today's residents. In addition, a Corporate Housing Program makes completely furnished, full -service rental homes available to employees on temporary assignment, those relocating, and new hires who need temporary housing. This array of programs stems from the Lewis "Service from the Heart" Commitment that encompasses responsive, professional on -site management plus a wide range of service programs. 2012 Santa Barbara,: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 192 2004 �., Homecoming at Terra Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 868 2003 Homecoming at Eastvale, Eastvale, CA 738 2003 Del Mar 11, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 166 2003 Carmel at Woodcreek. West, Roseville, CA 222 2003 Homecoming at Creekside, Sacramento, CA 450 2001 CarmelApartments, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 306 2001 Jamboree, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 358 ,.1995 Mountain View Park, San. Bernardino, CA 6 1990 Antelope Ridge, Antelope, CA 288 1990 Palm Desert. Garden Homes, Palm Desert, CA 9 1990 Pomona Housing Authority, Pomona, CA 25 1990 Del Mar, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 384 1990 Montecito, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 256 1989 Sahara West, Las Vegas, NV 292 1988 Linden Court, Rialto; CA ,180 1988 Crystal Cove, Las Vegas, NV 444 1987 Green Valley Apartments, Chino Hills, CA 152 1987 Green Valley Crest, Chino Hills, CA 81 1987 Park Place, Claremont, CA 12 1987 Village Green, Covina, CA 140 1987 Villa Capri, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 65 1987 Villa Capri/Crest, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 112 1987 .Rosemont Downs, Sacramento, CA 170 1986 Evergreen Apartments, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 393 1986 Sycamore Terrace, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 128 1986 Evergreen Park, Sacramento, CA 258 1986 The Sycamores, Vacaville, CA 264 1985 Casa Sonoma, Calexico, CA 68 1985 Somerset, Loma Linda, CA 104 1985 Mountainview, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 270 1985 Parkview Place, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 152 1985 Reno Houses, Reno, NV 10 1984 Rosewood - Redlands Pines, Loma Linda, CA 136 1982 Los Alisos, Norwalk, CA 48 1982 Palm Desert Garden Houses, Palm Desert, CA 53 1981 San Bernardino Housing Auth., San Bernardino, CA 47 1980 Sunscape 11, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 213 1980 Woodbridge, Sacramento, CA 14 1980 .Duplexes Gramercy Park, Sacramento, CA 11 1979 Boardwalk Apartments, Claremont, CA 18 1979 Park La Verne, La Verne, CA 82 1979 Redlands West, Loma Linda, CA 184 1979 Sycamore Park, Ontario, CA 108 1979 Gramercy Park Duplexes, Sacramento, CA 38 1979 Rosemont Duplexes, Sacramento, CA 62 1978 Alosta Place, Azusa, CA 118 � 1978 Sunflower Apartments, Chino Hills, CA 72 1978 Sunscape, San Bernardino, CA 124 1978 North. Upland Terrace, Upland, CA 62 1978 Rosemont Downs, Sacramento, CA 12 1978 Smoke Ranch Duplexes, Las Vegas, NV 20 1977 Sunscape West, Alta Loma, CA 172 1977 Sunscape, Las Vegas, NV 70 1976 Woodland Duplexes, Woodland, CA 42 So. California Rental Homes, Upland, CA 7 Las Vegas Houses, Las Vegas, NV 94 TOTAL 9,368 -For those communities huilt in multiple phases, the year shown is the year the first phme opened. 221 A leader in Shopping Center Development ewis Retail Centers is one of the largest shopping center developers in California and Nevada. It is also a member of the Lewis Group of Companies and has developed a portfolio of dynamic neighborhood, community, and lifestyle centers totaling over 9 million square feet. This prime space is home to many of the nation's most prestigious retailers. Included are Best Buy, Costco, Home Depot, JC Penney, Kohl's, Lowes, Macy's, Marshalls, RC Willey, Ross, Sam's Club, Target, Wal-Mart, Albertsons, Ralphs, Safeway, and Vons. Looking to the Future Lewis Retail Centers currently has more than twenty neighborhood and community shopping centers in development in California and Nevada. Whether it is a free standing shopping center, a retail project within a planned community, or a redevelopment project, the Lewis Group's strong track record of consistently delivering shopping centers that attract customers, serve retailers, and benefit cities continues to set it apart. Choice Sites fop Betolleps Who Demend the Best ALTA, LOMA SQUARE -1978 •MORNINGSIDE MARKETPLACE -2001 DEVELOPED PROJECTS Anchors: Vin., Rite Aid, Chase Anchors: Ralphs, Chase, KFC/Pizza Hut (Year shown is opening date) 100,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center 88,000 sq. R. Neighborhood Center $aoche.Gl3canl¢11P8S�alitacnia -VICTORIA GARDENS - 2004 Anchors: Macy's, JC Penney, AMC, Bass Pro 1,300,000 sq. ft. Lifestyle Center TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER- 1990 Anchors: Target, Ross, Old Navy, Michaels, HomeGoods, Bally Total Fitness 611,000 sq. ft. Community Center TOWN CENTER SQUARE - 1994 Anchors: Barnes & Noble, Stein Mart, OffieeMax, PetSmart, Pier 1 Imports 226,000 sq. ft. Community Center TERRA VISTA PROMENADE - 1996 Anchors: Home Depot, AutoZone, Old Spaghetti Factory 165,000 sq. ft. Community Center CENTRAL PARK PLAZA - 1991 Anchors: Ralphs, Rite Aid, US Bank 112,000 N. ft. Neighborhood Center 'TERRA VISTA VILLAGE - 1988 Anchors: Ralphs, Fitness 19, Blockbuster 135,000 sq, ft. Neighborhood Center ORCHARD HARDWARE PLAZA - 1981 Anchors: Orchard Supply Hardware, Factory 2,U 169,500 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center TERRA VISTA COMMONS - 2001 Anchors: AT&T. Texaco, McDonald's 13,500 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center HAVEN COURT - 2001 Anchors: CVS, Conroys Flowers 24,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center HAVEN SQUARE - 2009 Anchors: Fresh & Easy, Team Physical 26,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center MILLIKEN COURT -1003 Anchor: KinderCare, Texaco 34,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center P..LanuwdhanCalifo=hI DIAMOND BAR VILLAGE - 2006 Anchors: Target 152,000 sq, ft. Community Center £sniatua,.&aJifscoea HERITAGE VILLAGE -1000 Anchors: Vons, Blockhuster Video 110,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center HERITAGE TRIANGLE -2003 Anchors: Storage West, Wells Fargo Bank 1 11,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center SUMMIT HEIGHTS GATEWAY -1003 Anchors: Kohl's, Marshalls, Staples, PetSmart 260,000 sq. ft. Community Center SIERRA LAKES MARKETPLACE - 2004 Anchors: Lowes, Costco, OfficeMax, Petro 425,000 sq. ft. Community Center SIERRA LAKES VILLAGE -2X6 Anchors: Ralphs, Walgreens 107,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center SIERRA LAKES WEST -1006 Anchor: Home Depot, AutoZone 178,000 sq, ft. Community Center SIERRA LAKES PROFESSIONAL PARK -1008 Anchor: LA Fitness 120,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center Eastsalc, California EASTVALE GATEWAY I & II -2004 Anchors: Home Depot, Vons, Target, Best Buy, Kohls, Staples, PetSmart, Edwards Theatres, Sport Chalet 848,000 sq. ft. Community Center EASTVALE GATEWAY SOUTH -2011 Anchors: Walgreens, McDonalds, Taco Bell, Chevron 164,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center THE MARKETPLACE AT THE ENCLAVE, 2011 Anchors: CVS, AutoZone 104,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Appl • V 1lv C I'f .APPLE VALLEY COMMONS I & II -1007 Anchors: SuperTarget, Ross, Dollar Tree 428,000 sq. ft. Community Center Hgsucria. California HIGH DESERT GATEWAY -2009 Anchor: SuperTargeq Ross, Marshalls 347,000 sq. It. Community Center Ontario. California -MARKETPLACE AT ONTARIO CENTER -1007 Anchors: Sam's Club, Staples 246,000 sq. ft. Community Center THE VILLAGE AT ONTARIO CENTER -2003 Anchor: Kohls 109,000 sq. ft. Community Center Unbind. California MOUNTAIN/ARROW SQUARE - 1979 Anchors: Big 5, Foothill Independent Bank 39,550 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center 224 Baldwin Park. California ga brdral_glySlabfiarala BALDWIN PARK MARKETPLACE - 2004 THE MARKETPLACE AT ONE.ELEVBN - 2013 Anchor: WakMart, Fitness 19 207,000 sq. ft. Community Center 260,000 sq. ft. Community Center Sacramento California NATOMAS TOWN CENTER -2004 Anchors: Safeway, Rite Aid 130,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Vacaville, California REGENCY PARK PLAZA - 1990 Anchors: Fresh & Easy, CVS, In -Shape Fitness 114,000 sq, ft. Neighborhood Center Lac Vr-as,Nevada ORCHARDS MARKETPLACE - 2000 Anchors: Albertson, Blockbuster Video, McDonald's 97,300 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center RAINBOW PLAZA - 1992 Anchors: Home Depot, JC Penney Home Store 278,000 sq. ft. Community Center Ron.. Nevada DAMONTE RANCH TOWN CENTER -2005 Anchors: Home Depot, RC Willey, Office Depot 376,000 sq. ft. Community Center FUTURUPROPOSEO PROJECTS (Year shown is opening date) Ilceastie.S:alifatnia HIGH DESERT GATEWAY 11 -2013 223,000 sq. ft. Community Center Apple Valley California APPLE VALLEY COMMONS 1 & 11 - 2013 300,000 sq. ft. Community Center Addeo nr California ADELANTO TOWNE CENTER - 2014 280,000 sq. ft. Community Center Perris California PERRIS VALLEY TOWNE CENTER - 2013 674,000 sq. ft. Community Center Pialtv,3�aalifsrrll8 'RENAISSANCE MARKETPLACE -2014 674,000 sq. ft. Community Center 90Jxfatis,S�alifutnia PARKSIDE PLAZA -2015 116,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center San Bernardino. California NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW -2015 460,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center Redlands, California REDLANDS VILLAGE-2013 79,000 sq. ft. Neighhorhood Center NLenilnx SaJA0teia MENIF'EE VILLAGE-2013 150,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Ranch. Cucammoea. California DAYCREEK MARKETPLACE - 2013 90,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center MILLIKEN GATEWAY - 2015 100,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center TERRA VISTA COMMONS it - 2015 176,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center Chino Califonnia THE PRESERVE TOWN CENTER - 2016 250,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center 4.laiAlulI.-CAlifpxmia - HIGGINS BUSINESS PARK - 2013 60,000 K. ft. Mixed Use Center Eastvaic. California THE SHOPS AT EASTVALE COMMERCE - 2015 110,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use Center Riverside County VILLAGES OF LA KEVIEW -2018 350,000 sq. ft. Community Center Pomona, California RIO RANCHO TOWNE CENTER -2013 229,000 sq. ft. Community Center Anna California DOWNTOWN AZUSA - 2013 76,000 sq. @. Neighborhood Center Sacramento California NATOM AS TOWN SQUARE - 2015 20,000 sq. fL. Neighborhood Center Fairfield. Catifornia LAUREL CREEK PLAZA -2013 83,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center $.io �jstay'aii€stela DEL RIO HILLS TOWN CENTER - 2015 110,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Lincoln, California LINCOLN RANCH TOWN CENTER - 2015 100,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Rancho Cordova. California THE MARKETPLACE AT TTIE ARBORETUM - 2016 400,000 sq. ft. Community Center laE 4J'38.fl�lNe�_aJ�t SILVERADO RANCH BERMUDA - 2013 22,000 sq. ft. Retail Center Reno, Nevada DAMONTE RANCH TOWN CENTER II -2014 13 L000 sq. ft. Community Center THE MARKETPLACE AT CURTI RANCH 1- 2013 10,000 N. ft, Neighl aluxxi Center THE MARKETPLACE AT CURTI RANCH 11 AND ill - 2015 394,000 sq A. CommurdtY Center *Joint Venture 20 Ml Bayside, Hercules, CA - he Lewis Group of Companies" roots originated with home building. The companies continue to focus on identifying and then acquiring residential land which they subsequently entitle, develop, and sell to merchant or custom homebuilders. Activity includes transactions in the communities of Chino, Diamond Bar, Fontana, Lake Elsinore, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, Riverside County, Brawley, Calexico, Imperial, Fairfield, Sacramento Elk Grove, El Dorado Hills and Hercules, all in California, as well as Reno, Las Vegas and North Las Vegas in Nevada. The LewisGroup has sold lots to: Albert Seeno * The Allen Group . Brookfield Homes * California Pacific Homes • Centex Homes Corky McMillin Cos. * Distinguished Homes *'D.R. Horton • Greystone Homes • John Laing Homes + KB Home' K.Hovnanian Homes • Lennar Homes • Meritage Homes • Morrison Homes * Pardee Homes • Richmond American Ryland Homes • Shea Homes * Standard Pacific • TaylorWoodrow • U.S. Home • William Lyon Homes 226 The Lewis Group of Companies works with major landowners, other developers, financial institutions, and companies in other businesses which also have real estate holdings to manage their real estate and unlock value. The arrangements vary depending on many circumstances. The companies will manage for a fee, put in equity, or joint venture and share in the creation of value and long-term ownership. Throughout the Lewis Group's history we have cherished the many partnerships we have formed: Cities, Counties & Public Agencies: Claremont Unified School District — Purchase and exchange of office building for vacant school site Irvine Ranch Water District — 150 homes, Mission Viejo, CA and 600 homes, Lake Forest, CA Orange County Flood Control District — Entitling 1658 acres, including 3600 homes, in Highland, CA for the County of Orange Redevelopment/Economic Development Agencies: Azusa, Baldwin Park, Claremont, Covina, Loma Linda, Los Angeles County, Norwalk, Ontario, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, Sacramento, Victorville, West Covina, all in California Upland Unified School District — Construction of bus facility in exchange for development site County of San Bernardino — Redevelopment of 1,097 acre Chino Airport with three other partners leodowners: David Valentine — 88,000 sq. ft. Morningside Marketplace, Fontana, CA Kiyan Family — 400 homes, West Covina and Fontana, CA ' Lefetra Family — 150 homes, La Verne, CA National Orange Show — 143 acre mixed use project, San Bernardino, CA PG & E Properties — 150 homes, Sacramento, CA University of La Verne — 375,000 sq. ft. Business Park, La Verne, CA Waegell Family — 5,000 homes and apartments, Rancho Cordova, CA Ramos Family — 1200 homes and retail center, Vacaville, CA Fellow Developers: Carl Ross & Lewis Group — 350,000 sq. ft. Centrelake, Ontario, CA F3 91 Acre 1,000,000 sq. ft. project, Hesperia, CA Di Loreto Construction, Bailey 6f Dutton & Lewis Group — 5,600 homes, Damonte Ranch, Reno, NV W. "Low G,n.r" refers m one m more me ,b,s nf,hc Lew. Gmup of Cmnpn,ucs Forest City F3 Lewis Group — 2,400,000 sq. ft. Victoria Gardens regional lifestyle center and 300 condominiums, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Hillwood & Lewis Group — 540 acres, 1,750 homes and commercial in Rialto, CA and an office park in Rancho Cucamonga, CA LNR 63 Lewis Group — 4,000,000 sq. ft. Sierra Business Park, Fontana, CA McIntyre-Reenders Company & Lewis Group — Eight residential developments in Covina, Diamond Bar, Norco and West Covina, all in California Pardee Homes, Standard Pacific Homes, Tejon Ranch Company & Lewis Group — 22,000 homes, Centennial, Los Angeles County, CA Pacific Coast Capital Partners & Lewis Group — 798 lots in Reno, Sparks and Dayton, NV Sares-Regis & Lewis Group — 246,000 sq. ft. Marketplace at Ontario Center, 226,000 sq. ft. Ontario Commerce Center, both in Ontario, CA, 260,000 sq, ft. Pacific Commerce Center, City of Industry, CA and 196,000 sq. ft. Rochester Business Park, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Saybrook Capital & Lewis Group — Mather South, approximately 700 acres in Sacramento County, CA Storage West & Lewis Group — 100,000 sq. ft. storage facility, Rancho Cucamonga, CA and 80,000 sq. ft. storage facility, Fontana, CA Stratham Group & Lewis Group — 1,200 homes, Ontario, CA and 2,400 homes, Chino, CA Young Homes & Lewis Group - 3,800 homes, Fontana, CA Van Daele Development & Lewis Group — 135 homes, Fontana, CA and 32 homes, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Victoria Gardens, Rancho Cucamova, CA 227 A Tradition of Success in Office and Industrial Development ewis Commercial, a member of the Lewis Group of Companies, has a long history of success in office and industrial development. The Lewis Group has developed 20 office and industrial sites at key locations throughout California and Nevada and several new projects are currently in development. The Lewis organization has been involved in this phase of real estate development for over 35 years. Developed Office PPolecls 1976/78 Rosemont, Sacramento, CA 11,267 sq. ft. 1978/81 Mountain/Arrow Center, Upland, CA 31,650 sq. ft. 1978 North Mountain Professional Park, Upland, CA 71,338 sq. ft. 1985 Palora Plaza & Joy Way, Yuba City, CA 14,734 sq. ft. 1991 Ross Park, El Centro, CA 6,552 sq. ft. 2007 Vintner's Grove Office Park, Rancho Cucamonga, CA* 138,000 so. ft. TOTAL 273,541 sq. ft. Developed lodustrial Projects 1977 Ninth Street Industrial Buildings, Upland, CA 13,800 sq. ft. 1980/84 Arrow Industrial Center, Upland, CA 84,271 sq. ft. 1983 Live Oak Commerce Center, Baldwin Park, CA 76,259 sq. ft. 1986-90 Hacienda/Polaris Business Park, Las Vegas, NV 163,556 sq. ft. 1988 Chino Valley Business Center, Chino, CA 79,456 sq. ft. 1988 Hemet Recreational Vehicle Park, Hemet, CA 212 spaces 1989 Terra Vista Business Park, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 93,109 sq. ft. 1991.95 Oakcrest Business Park, Sparks, NV 164,723 sq. ft. 2001 Ontario Commerce Center, Ontario, CA* 226,528 sq. ft. 2002 Storage West, Rancho Cucamonga, CA* 100,379 sq. ft. 2002 Storage West, Fontana, CA* 80,697 sq. ft. 2003 Pacific Commerce Center, City of Industry, CA* 260,000 sq. ft. 2005 Rochester Business Park, Rancho Cucamonga, CA* 196,000 sq. ft. 2006 Sierra Business Park, Fontana, CA* 3,000,000 so. ft. TOTAL 4,538,778 sq. ft. Office and lodustptal Park land Sales 2004 Centrelake, Ontario, CA* 26 acres 2004 Sierra Business Park, Fontana, CA* 208 acres 2007 South Fontana, Fontana, CA* 290 acres 2008 Olive Grove, Rialto, CA* 30 acres Fulure Office / to lustrial Projects 2012 Sierra Business Park, Fontana, CA* 425,000 2013 Eastvale Commerce Center, Eastvale, CA 4,000,000 2013 Renaissance, Rialto, CA* 4.675,000 2013 National Orange Show, San Bernardino, CA 900,000 2014 Higgins Business Park, Chino Hills, CA 386,000 2015 Wagonwheel, Henderson, NV 310,000 2016 Arboretum, Rancho Cordova, CA 360,000 2020 Villages of Lakeview, Riverside County, CA 150,000 •Ivmt vents Appreciation Expressed by State and National leaders Reeogniton hrom me United States congress; • Certificate of special recognition to the Lewis Group on the occasion of the groundbreaking of Sierra Business Park in Fontana and expressing appreciation for the exemplary dedication to serving the residents of the Inland'- Empire. Congressman Joe Baca Augusr5, 2005 To Goldy Lewis for 45 years of stellar leadership in the real estate development industry. Congressman David Dreier July 1, 2000 Resolutions Pom the California State Senate and Assembly: • In appreciation of Lewis Operating Corp.'s partnership with the League of California Cities and for showing leadership in Democracy through active participation in local governance. Honorable Norma J. Torres, 61 st Assembly District November.3, 2011 • Commending Lewis Operating Corp. on being a 2011 Business Partner of the League of California Cities and for Lewis' continued support of an organization that works to defend local government in California. Honorable Bob Dutton, 31 st Senatorial District - November 3, 2011 • Congratulating Richard Lewis and Randall Lewis on receiving the PAC Medal of Honor from the Building Industry Association of Southern California. Honorable Michael D. Duvall, 72nd Assembly District April3, 2008 • Commending Randall Lewis for facilitating Excellence in Sustainable Community Development and congratulating him on recognition from The Valley Group at their 17rh Annual Award of Excellence banquet. Honorable Jim Battin, 37th Senatorial District November 5, 2005 • Congratulating the Lewis family on the occasion of the dedication of the Ralph M. Lewis Sports Complex in Fontana and applauding the family's dedication to the quality of life in the community. Honorable Nell Soto, 32nd Senatorial District January 31, 2004 • Gratefully recognizing Goldy S. Lewis for her continued work in the field of real estate development and her impressive record of career and civic achievements. Honorable Nell Soto, 32nd Senatorial District June 15, 2000 • Expressing appreciation to Ralph and Goldy Lewis and the family for nearly a half century of contributions to the building industry and to the welfare and improvement of the community on the occasion of being presented the Builders of the Century Award. Honorable Nell Soto, 61 st Assembly District October 1, 1999 • Commending Ralph and Goldy Lewis for being named Builders of the Century by the Baldy View Chapter of the Building Industry Association of Southern California and recognizing the Lewis family's tradition of quality, integrity and stability. Honorable Keith Olberg, 34th Assembly District September 28, 1999 • Congratulating the Lewis organization on its receipt of the 1998 Vision 2000 Award from the Fontana Area Chamber of Commerce for enhancing the community with its Siena Lakes project and for its long and distinguished record of community service. Honorable Bill Leonard, 63rd Assembly District Honorable Fred Aguiar, 61 st Assembly District Honorable Ruben S. Ayala, 32nd Senatorial District Honorable James L. Brulte, 31 st Senatorial District June 11, 1998 • Congratulating Ralph and Goldy Lewis as recipients of the first Lifetime Achievement Award presented by the Baldy View Region of the Building Industry Association of Southern California in recognition of their well-deservedbusiness success and exemplary record of philanthropic endeavors. Honorable Bill Leonard, 25th Senatorial District February 21, 1992 229 Reaching Out To The Community he Lewis Group of Companies recognizes the importance of helping to make the communities where it does business better places to live. As business members and active participants in the community, the Lewis Group believes in getting involved and giving back to the community. A strong emphasis is placed on outreach programs that support and promote healthy communities, education, and youth organiza- tions. The following is a partial listing of some of the achievements and philanthropic activities: Recognition and Awards Building Industry Association of Southern California Baldy View Chapter Builder of the Century — Lewis Family California Building Industry Hall of Fame — Ralph Lewis, Richard Lewis, & Randall Lewis Building Industry Association of Southern California Builder of the Year — Ralph Lewis & Richard Lewis Lewis Family Playhouse at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA Building Industry Association of Southern California Lifetime Achievement Award — Ralph & Goldy Lewis Building Industry Association of Southern California PAC Medal of Honor — Richard Lewis & Randall Lewis Southern Nevada Homebuilders Association Builder of the Year — Robert Lewis & Jennifer Lewis SANBAG 2011 Exemplary Achievement Award Randall Lewis Im _,t. 230 North State Building Industry Association Meritorious Award — Lewis Planned Communities Nevada Business Hall of Fame Robert Lewis Professional Builder Magazine Builder of the Year — Ralph & Goldy Lewis City of Hope Spirit of Life Award Ralph & Goldy Lewis California Business Properties Assn. 2006 Champion of the Industry Award — Randall Lewis Los Angeles Times 2006 "West 100" List Randall Lewis In Business Las Vegas Top 40 Under 40 Jennifer Lewis Los Angeles Times Special Recognition Award Lewis Family Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Shirley N. Pettis Award - Lewis Family Frontier Project 2009 Environmental Steward Award Honoree — Lewis Group of Companies Community Involvement Ralph & Goldy Lewis Hall, USC, Los Angeles, CA Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Lewis Library & Technology Center, Fontana, CA The Valley Group Excellence in Sustainable Chaffey College Fontana Campus Ralph M. Lewis Center Community Award — Randall Lewis Fontana, CA R 231 More Community Involvement Ralph M. Lewis Sports Complex, Fontana, CA Ralph & Goldy Lewis Library, Colony High School, Ontario, CA Ralph M. Lewis Park, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Lewis Family Playhouse, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Rancho Cucamonga, CA Goldy S. Lewis Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Lewis Park, Claremont, CA Lewis Family Park, Las Vegas, NV Randall Lewis Health Policy Fellowship Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA and Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA Ralph M. Lewis Sports Complex, Fontana, CA HomeAid Captain, Leroy Haynes Center for Children and Family Services, La Verne, CA HomeAid Captain, Lutheran Social Services, Transitional Housing, Ontario, CA Founding Sponsor: Healthy Chino, Healthy Fontana, Healthy Ontario, Healthy Rancho Cucamonga, Inland Empire Utilities Agency "Chino Basin Green" and "A Water Wise Garden in Every School" programs Initial Participant: Metropolitan Water District "California Friendly Home" program Scholarships:. Cal Poly Pomona, Chaffey College, Citrus College, Truckee Meadows Community College, UCLA, University of La Verne, UNLV, USC Claremont, CA Hospitals: Major Contributors to San Antonio Community Hospital, Upland; Loma Linda Hospital, Loma Linda; City of Hope, Duarte, all in California, Lou Ruvo Brain Institute and Nevada Cancer Institute both in Las Vegas, NV Community Partner and Major Donor: Public/private partnership with Nuview Union School District and Nuview Youth Sports to develop Mystic Field, Lakeview, CA (Riverside County) Major Donor: University of Nevada, Las Vegas Center for Entrepreneurship, University of La Verne Campus Center Project, Smith Center for Performing Arts, Fender Center for Performing Arts, The UCLA Foundation Pauley Pavilion Renovation Project Support of Youth Organizations: AYSO, Boy Scouts of America, Boys and Girls Club, Campfire USA, Chino Valley Youth Boxing Foundation, YMCA, Students Run LA, The Leaven Las Vegas, NV Fontana, CA L b 23J Tributes from the Communities We serve d 6Your company's genuine interest in what is good for the community in which you are building is very commendable. Your understanding and professionalism in this area have been greatly appreciated and have fostered an excellent working relationship with our staff. Kenneth R. Hunt, City Manager, Fontana, California ra essionals that understands and embraces the 6� The Lewis Group is a team of consummate p f public -private partnership development model. They are engaged in every facet of the community in our economic development initiatives. The Lewis Group is a key and are active participants corporate citizen in Hesperia. f Economic Development, Hesperia, California Steven J. Lantsherger, Deputy Director o outstanding developer, staffed by results -oriented professionals • Its The Lewis Group is an the communities in which it comprehensive approach to planning enables it to ingratiate itself with is developing. Lewis's professionalism and commitment to customer satisfaction has led us to look forward to future partnerships with great anticipation. � Y le valley, California Kenneth J. Henderson, Assistant Town Manager, Apple S of your company's projects has set a high standard in Rancho Cucamonga, and The quality one of which we are all proud. The commitment to quality stems from your company's desire to create the best product and foster good working relationships throughout the development process. Jack Lam, Former City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga, California d 4 It is evident that the Lewis Group takes great pride in its product and attaining a high level of customer satisfaction. The Lewis Group listens to the community's needs and incorporates them into their plans. Your staff is open to ideas and suggestions. The end result is the successful development of a project. $ Glen Rojas, Former City Manager, Chino, California 46Ontario has always enjoyed its relation with the Lewis family and companies - it's a true always partnership. Your long time view and concern about what's best for the community has resulted in projects of the highest quality. 1 Greg Devereaux, Former City Manager, Ontario, California and Current CEO of County of San Bernardino, California NEI 234 Lewis Group OF Companies Lewis Community Developers • Lewis Retail Centers • Lewis Apartment Communities Lewis Commercial • Lewis Land Developers • Lewis Operating Corp. Sierra Lakes Land Company • Lewis Investment Company of Nevada CALIFORNIA OFFICES Southern California Regional Office 1156 North Mountain Avenue P.O. Box 670 Upland, California 91785-0670 909.985.0971 RICHARD A. LEWIS, President DAVID L. LINDEN, Vice President, Director of Asset Management LEON C. SWAILS, Chief Operating Officer Northern California Regional Office 9216 Kiefer Boulevard Sacramento, California 95826 916.363.2617 DOUG V. MULL, Vice President, Regional Manager NEVADA OFFICES Southern Nevada Regional Office 5240 South Polaris Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89132 702.891.5260 ROBERT E. LEWIS, President JENNIFER A. LEWIS, Vice President DAVID DIFFLEY, Vice President Northern Nevada Regional Office 1380 Greg Street, Suite 231 Sparks, Nevada 89431 775.331.6900 GIGI H. CHISEL, Vice President TED ERKAN, Vice President, Engineering www.lewisop.com W LJJ LV. Fgl>ry�ry.2012 ATTACHMENT 4 W v :3 a r�l , • rl a ,o ,ter. o � . cn Q� k 237 F i it 3 t i Y q n x r, t { k t � � k fiW 4r Y { h 4 4 rNx y 4 i r }t $ TT k I l I � J P q , F�4Y tY= }4 L �5A7 {j4 x � 6 (� R¢ ✓ t et, i i t F lFi � 6 yt F I t�r x �{ t � i 1 � rt t a - a k� Pr A 23 -64 bp w to —60 N'.. v .. m o G� 'd °r o o 0 41w c�yv'. i (]' ° tr S.i Cy ,u G 2 OD ''� v .ui y Q , ..N R �'. "V v...C,aj u "^ G. ,...v m O. Cl." a� b v 'R rob o b vp .G.: •� .� .S co v .v F4 co v y woo V v U O � r"!. pp. .m1 • � G .0 y 'C a`.IG N � y � b o x "zz f!J i✓4l 0 LLI . •b G v v G O w h ... w �. ro(71 v G ro o v 3 v v a aao v.~00 °G°� x cc a � vo �o� o�� v � n c. 6.�.0 �'o.� ,n.'�,�•ro d v w'5 w o bv' o� v ._ o :: v cv;R v a v c°ro w w n G bb m N a° o m o O.C.' R .> �'^,�? .� W O O .ro " R 'LS auRi T1. OA v .O , of m -bq N O N... ` w" v R bA'0 0 v :. m. y :ro .i .. .p G G.wO w•'' V '�"' A� ""b y . R .. . �, bb ui rr 0! R .. U) its "_ `r.+ .O. 51. .: � C'J i. � v -w >i • y O' w: 'y bON v..v A .... "CY m p G p R it o onR' m; a am o G -+. G v C y y OO. ..A cn N Q) C .,� wo R .y' tlaV' o > o N Ow N N G WU) A" v R;v; wO N O � fa N 'b •� .. yLr y Oci a x �7w R� t V Cv O cn " C7 •R pp v�'o' fq'� G.� v a, v .`p G CD a (U o ti s v.5d3 �¢ a 5 v o Qo 3 a x F. o v G bn -} b N .� w$° v vow w eov U c,Lr, a'v G yo.a v .. .G o. p„b...C, p v o, v; y y� , o .R bc R Ca w �..o R. n $ m"AG : a x ro o o° o >A o•� v eu''c v v• vbc �� ,� "V G'b'"aGi. ^vimaj . O N Obp x v R G O r. Jy vR ENS R o��..c >4•oNO vim,°Q� Gb0m'o'm"°Sioo bri m 4 bHD -'O R in �0v ' N w Ti yew CO'. w +' G G GO' u aom ro v w o.3 � 4G 0 w b w� 6 �'� Cam. 23 C4 N . v O w R.ru 'Ile w x � � 0D �n [ z- 240 bo .w�. .. C bo > . �, o .a A w > '7 .3 .C-C �'w N v. v v 'C .4 0) 9, Q Ow a O Q"p AO w N bA C - O v' p R. >a, w .' O .N..� ccVdd .. r , '.c'...>_ N pp �'.• i0„ 3 . N y '[ •'•+ p O' a� ..:� o C m ..aCi o. b. C o v b a, O ,� r. .. v � ro d v° aao atiFOo >�>�.� �C� v o y v o° v '.b -7o C A0 o °jo 0'0 'b vU T�v' O'A O 'rt>yu3 V oo o c p : O �°V'a oowV ° > a>, w y a v o w R D. C� •� .. .-O+ " N :� C 'b y ii w �" "'> N V...0 Q~ . O y 'C au to tff p C C v . G p ,o''... ©� :'.bon .G na= ° o v.. d a v w' ° bo= o o ° - v m 3 �''3 q c 4 0 ti'.0 .t7 'b0 C Q w..ox I C O O N w C,. e. C cuJ N R w p � w.+ bd C v b0 'Rtl pTLVC ON r, 3a r� �Ubn �a 0'� v 0 0 8 as o o °v c o° r 0 9 U °' ° a, o o ti ff u v'a? v v v 0D ° a d :0 �.�':' y'� a>i ��' "wb°. •� c v E` o ed , C7 a~i 3 r .0 241 (7 242 � ' f f �. 1 � f I�� .' i � x� ; � 'i,. x. sw t }9 ( iA � "� '=3� a r �t",. � 1 mot.., � P r^:� �. .�. �. a.�. 0 ���-�.'. ,l t rc*!:2a y mxk 1 d� a y5 a es • e ►` v�.54 ¥ &< . am: aU «° C Evli F s i c n y $ C•J• �-i� I� Ir ;`^T^^ \ t, ^� F pia ' f (} `j 4�f � W KV .7 s Q L Or(•Sa u V - r__i:. M f Y e V 0: Z ,HIN ♦ O i' Q N i b V im w a s i a ip I J 6 w. N wW W W1 Wy5 .Tl U i UUyQ1<� 1<I{X� }( I ai F � 1� 4 m aQ 6.....66 Z::fi Ui N - b go c r .� N ^1 =;• ut 5D y 251 N z c G n a F i 0 Zj 4 ,* ... 3 �, . ., x w x ,� � �_ r�;� � � - { �� � � � a. � .y � � 0.' � ; � " � V ,« i,�� � r ; � REPORT/INFORMATIONAL ITEM: % RECEIVED 2012 OCT 15 AM 1115 CITY OF LA OUINTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Memo To: La Quinta City Council From: Robert Cox CC: City Manager Date: 10/15/2012 Re: Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District It is once again my privilege to update the Council on the activities and plans of the Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District. I believe we continue to develop into not only a very efficiently run District but an effective service District benefiting the citizens of the Coachella Valley. We have established our District as a respected member and leader within the Vector Control Community. Among other activities, we currently have a Trustee who has been elected as a Southern California Representative to the Mosquito and Vector Control Association of California, our Finance Director has been selected as the Treasurer of the MVCAC and our Scientific Officer has been selected for the Science Committee for the Association. As I know you are aware, this season has been very challenging and active. We have experienced a greater outbreak of vector bome viruses, specifically the West Nile Virus. The numbers and percentages have been considerably higher than in years past. We have had a greater number of positive test findings but have been fortunate to have only two human cases locally with one other case that was contracted from outside the valley. I believe part of the low human numbers is in part because of the proactive procedures of the District. Some of the challenges we have faced can be traced to the receding of the Salton Sea as well as the recent flooding and other problems of standing water, including neglected pools. Our employees have put in a great deal of extra time and effort, juggling schedules, extra work days and hours as well as using our flight contractor a great deal more than normal. Although this has been a heavy hit on our budget, proper planning has enabled us to have the emergency funds available for such events. On'the subject of our budget, we have an extremely dedicated and proficient Finance Department. We also have a group of knowledgeable Trustees on the oversight Finance Committee, of which I have served as Treasurer for the past two years. We continue to function in a very transparent manner and also with a long range plan in hand. For instance, we are now in the first stages of our Lab Expansion project, having selected the architecture and engineering group and with the knowledge that through proper planning we have set aside the funds to pay for this project. This project, like any other major project we undertake, is developed in a very systematic procedure within our Capital Investment Policy and Procedures that has been put in place. 25� A few of the other items that we have developed and/or improved are: • Trustee Manual - to include recommended and required training classes • By Laws - corrected to meet H & S code and State requirements • Personnel Policy and Procedures updates • Travel Policy updates • Purchase and Inventory - a complete computerized accountability system • Investment Policy - yearly review and update • Capital Investment and CIP policies • Strategic Plan - yearly review and update It has been a rewarding year and for those of us who are very involved, it has been a busy year. I have served as Treasurer for the past two years and as such, chair the Finance Committee where we not only review the regular finances but help in the planning for the future. This of course also involves the budget development process and the financial oversight of major projects we have in progress. We also work with the statewide agencies that we are involved with such as LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) and our various JPA's . I have thoroughly enjoyed these past few years and would consider it an honor to continue to serve as the representative from the City of La Quinta. My term expires in December 2012 and I would request that the Council reappointment me for a full term effective January, 2013. Robert G. Cox Trustee, Treasurer of the Board Representing the City of La Quinta Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District • Page 2 258 REPORTSANFORMATIONAL ITEM: 4� MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING April 4, 2012 V A special meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA CALL TO ORDER 10:05 a.m. A. This regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:05 a.m. by Planning Manager David Sawyer who led the Committee in the flag salute. Q C. Committee Members Present: Committee Member Absent: Richard Gray, Kevin McCune, and Ray Rooker None Staff present: Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Secretary Monika Radeva. PUBLIC COMMENT: None CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed CONSENT CALENDAR: Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 4, 2012. There being no comments or corrections it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Rooker/McCune to approve the minutes as submitted. AYES: Committee Members McCune and Rooker. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Committee Member Gray. BUSINESS ITEMS: 0 submitted by AV Con Architectural, and Unit L Mountain (formerly Pasatie side of Avenue 58, 'A mile 863, Amendment NO. 1 has been on, LLC. for consideration of ' aping Plans for Alta Verde Coral Tract 34243; located on the north of Madison Street. ? 5 9 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. Planning Manager Sawyer asked the Committee if there were any questions of staff. Committee Member Gray asked if the project improvements had been completed. Staff replied that they had. There being no further questions of staff, Planning Manager Sawyer said the applicant had prepared a presentation that they would like to show to the Committee. Mr. Andrew Adler, CEO of Alta Verde Group, 315 South Beverly Drive, Suite 208, Beverly Hills, CA, introduced himself and gave a brief overview of the company's history and experience, explained the applicant's intent for the proposed project, and described in detail why the architectural design and features were chosen. Mr. Adler noted that the three existing model homes were being repainted to match the proposed development color palette and some design elements that had been perceived as overly ornate had been removed to make them blend in with the new architectural design. Mr. Adler said all of the proposed homes have basic solar systems installed, therefore, a portion of the roofs were flat. He explained the homeowners would be given the opportunity to upgrade from basic solar to level two, three, and so forth, at the time of purchase, and increase the energy efficiency of the house. Mr. Anthony Poon, Principal with Poon Design, Inc., 315 South Beverly Drive, Suite 206, Beverly Hills, CA, introduced himself and said the architectural style was inspired a lot by the Tuscan Italian style in its simplicity and honesty, speaking with the quality of the materials instead of the use of ornaments. He gave a brief overview of the three different color palettes used, as well as the difference of the front doors, garage doors, window color frames, etc. 2 260 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Mr. Adler said the final product was four types of homes with different facades that did not incorporate a lot of ornate elements, the architecture had been left simple, and the landscaping variety had been used almost as a decorative feature. Mr. Adler explained there were six different color palettes combined with three different landscape palettes which essentially create different type homes. Mr. Adler said general improvements had already been made to the site, expected pre -sale date of the homes was to begin in September of 2012, with actual construction commencing at the beginning of 2013. Committee Member Gray asked if there were any sidewalks around the property. Mr. Adler replied there were existing sidewalks within the development leading to the park area which would also be used as a retention basin. Committee Member Gray asked where the pool equipment would be located on the lots. Mr. Adler replied there hadn't been a particular location selected for the pool equipment as it would have to be determined on a case -by -case basis. If there was an accessory structure, it would most likely be placed on the side of it, and if there were no accessory structure, it would be placed on the side of the landscaping wall. Committee Member McCune asked staff what was the required setback for an accessory structure. Principal Planner Nesbit explained what the code requirements were in terms of size, height, and setbacks. Committee Member McCune asked if the pools would be built as part of the homes. Mr. Adler replied the proposed pools and open pool structures/cabanas would be offered as an option to the homeowners. He explained there would be three different pool types available to choose from and the proposed accessory structures would be in compliance with the City code requirements in terms of height and setbacks. Committee Member McCune asked if the pools would have a spa. 3 .It 261 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Mr. Adler said the spa would also be an option for the homeowner to choose from; however, the spa would be incorporated into the pool, leaving the pool size the same. Committee Member McCune asked about the solar option offered with the homes. Mr. Adler explained that the homes would have base solar system already installed with the inverter located in the garage. Thus, the solar foundation would be in place and it would be up to the owner to decide whether or not to expand upon it. He said provided that the solar tax rebates were still available, it would cover the cost of the upgrade for the homeowner. Committee Member Gray asked if the parapet roof wall would be tall enough to hide the solar panels. Mr. Adler replied it would. Committee Member Gray asked what materials would be used for the pools. Mr. Adler replied it would either be plaster or pebble tech. Committee Member Rooker said he very much liked the project. He expressed a concern regarding the large amount of exposed windows incorporated into the proposed architectural design that were not protected by either an awning or some type of a roof covering which might become an issue during the hot summer months in the desert. He also noted that the proposed French doors, opening outward, on the back of the homes facing the backyards were too close to the pool and suggested that those be replaced with sliders to eliminate any possible functional issues with the lack of space. Mr. Adler said the design team had performed detailed incremental studies on the homes in order to ensure that they meet or exceed the established requirements by fifteen percent in order to receive the solar tax credits available. He explained that the orientation of the homes was designed from east to west so that the majority of the exposed windows were not in direct sunlight during the day. He noted that the windows located on the north and south sides of the homes, which would be directly exposed to the sun, had some type of a window treatment. He explained in detail the different window treatments used and the measures that had been taken in order to ensure compliance with Title 24 requirements. 4 n 26-) Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Committee Member Rooker said he would have liked for the proposed color palette to be a bit deeper and richer. He also suggested the use of a fuller and richer landscaping palette in order to soften the architectural lines and make the homes appear lusher, as he found the proposed landscaping palette to be a bit scarce. Mr. Adler replied he was a big supporter of lush landscaping; however, it was against almost all of the current desert scape mandates and water efficiency requirements. He explained why the proposed landscaping palette was chosen and how it was used to make the homes appear plusher. Discussion followed regarding the overall landscaping of the project, the types of trees and brushes used, the shortcomings of the landscape renderings failing to provide a realistic image of what would be actually installed on site, etc. Mr. Chuck Shepardson, ASLA, President of HSA Design Group, 76- 255 Via Sovana, Indian Wells, CA 92210, introduced himself and said that the selected shrub material consisting of Ocotillos, Agaves, Yuccas, etc., were intentionally selected as they would keep their shape and structure over time in comparison with the use of Bougainvillea type shrub material which would be in the hands of whoever would be handling it. Mr. Adler said that he concurred with the architectural team's suggestion to add palm trees to the proposed landscaping palette to give the project an oasis/resort-type feel. Committee Member Gray asked if palm trees would be installed in the front yards. Mr. Adler confirmed. Committee Member Gray asked if landscaping would be installed in the rear yards. Mr. Adler replied that no landscaping would be provided, but the homeowners would have the option to have the developer install the landscaping in the rear yards as an upgrade and choose from three different landscaping design plans. Committee Member Gray asked what landscaping would be installed at the retention basin greenway. Mr. Adler replied that no changes would be made to it. 5 26 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Committee Member McCune asked if it had been maintained over the years. Mr. Adler replied that recently it had been completely redone. Mr. Russell Jones, Construction Manager for Alta Verde Builders, 71-905 Highway 111, Suite G, Rancho Mirage, CA, introduced himself and gave an overview of the landscaping of the retention basin and the common areas outside and inside the gates. Committee Member McCune asked if the homes facing the retention basin through the rear yards would have a lower back wall than the rest of the homes within the development. Mr. Adler replied that the CC&Rs required that metal fences be installed for the back yards of those homes and that there would be no access to the greenway through the back yards. Discussion followed regarding the treatment for the metal fence and the height and type of retention wall that surrounds the greenway. Committee Member Rooker asked if there was any way to mandate the homeowners to landscape the back yards. Mr. Adler said that such a mandate would not be easily enforceable and explained why. Committee Member Gray asked if any patio area would be provided for the back yards if the homeowners do not select a pool upgrade option. Mr. Adler replied a basic pad would be provided and described its dimensions and finish. Discussion followed regarding different finish options for the concrete for the driveways, the patios, and how those would blend in with the proposed architecture. Discussion followed regarding the height, slopes, and design of the roof lines, drainage lines, etc. Committee Member Rooker suggested to leave the comments made by the Committee on the project merely as comments and not include them in the motion, so that the approval of the project is not contingent upon them. Mr. Adler asked the Committee to consider removing bullet points A and B under recommendation No. 2 of the staff report requesting R 264 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 that the applicant change the arched doors, windows and openings for the existing Lot 40 unit, to make them consistent with the new unit types, and to install a stone veneer treatment on the facade of at least one of the existing units. Mr. Jones said the side walls of the existing units facing the street were currently slump -stone stucco. He noted that those would be replaced with split -face precision block which would help create a similar stone look in between each house. Mr. Adler added that they would like to not have to structurally tear down the existing units and leave them as they were. He explained that metal awnings were being added to the windows and the doors which would hide the existing arches over them. Upon being asked if that addressed staff's concerns, Planning Manger Sawyer noted that staff would like to keep the recommendations as listed in the staff report to ensure consistency within the development. Committee Member Gray asked what color had been selected for the side metal gates of the homes. Mr. Adler said that detail had not yet been finalized, but it would most likely be a soft tan color. The Committee would like the applicant to consider the following comments and suggestions: • Use of sliding doors vs. French doors at rear of units • Possible dog wiring area in common greenbelt • Add better window treatments for sun protection • Deepen/darken the proposed color palette • Add more landscaping and lusher materials to the proposed landscaping palette There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members McCune/Rooker to adopt Minute Motion 2012-003, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-863, Amendment No. 1, as submitted with staff's recommendations, but modifying bullet point A to say: 263 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 "All arched doors, windows and openings on the existing units shall be covered with painted metal screen awnings, consistent in design with those of the new unit types." And delete bullet point B from recommendation No. 2. Unanimously approved. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: Committee Member Rooker said he was not pleased with the status change of the Committee to City employees. Staff explained the reasons that had made the status change necessary. General discussion followed regarding the status change and similar changes that had been implemented in the surrounding cities in the Coachella Valley. Vill. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS: Planning Manager Sawyer gave an overview of the cases that had been presented to the Planning Commission for review and consideration and the actions taken. IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members McCune/Gray to adjourn this meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a Regular Meeting to be held on May 2, 2012. This meeting was adjourned at 11:28 a.m. on April 4, 2012. Respectfully MONIKA RAiDEVA Secretary 8 �60 REPORTSANFORMATIONAL ITEM: -� MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA September 11, 2012 I. CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Chairwoman Barrows. PRESENT: Commissioners Alderson, Weber, Wilkinson, Wright and Chairwoman Barrows. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Les Johnson, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Andrew Mogensen, Assistant Planner Eric Ceja and Executive Secretary Carolyn Walker. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: There being no comments, or suggestions, it was moved by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to approve the minutes of July 24, 2012, as submitted. Unanimously approved. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. General Plan Amendment 2010-121, and Environmental Assessment 2012-622: a request by the City of La Quinta to consider a recommendation to the City Council Regarding the Following; Certification of an Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2010111094), Approval of the Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reduction Plan, and Adoption of the General Plan Update for use City-wide. 267 Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Principal Planner Andrew Mogensen presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. He then introduced Nicole Criste of Terra Nova Planning and Research, the lead consultant on the project who provided further information on the Circulation Element. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Wilkinson commented on: • Population calculations • The minimum of one acre lots for low density and equestrian areas • Traffic circles, their costs, fuel efficiency and safety Principal Engineer Wimmer expanded upon the value of roundabouts and if they could not be utilized in a certain location then a traffic signal would be considered. General discussion followed regarding lifestyle and healthy living comments. Commissioner Alderson commented on: • The safety element of roundabouts • The location of the roundabouts currently constructed Commissioner Wright commented on: • Mixed use as a large part of the plan and its effects on the City • Roundabouts being a good idea but should probably be looked at individually Commissioner Weber commented on: • How the traffic element addresses the southern La Quinta areas • A more detailed explanation of the Harrison Street eight -lane versus four -lane debate • La Quinta's interaction with neighboring communities on the traffic element • Potential impact of various streets; i.e., Madison Street, Avenue 60 and Avenue 62 266 -2- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 • Potential impact of the traffic element on the Travertine Specific Plan • Letter from the Agua Caliente Band Ms. Criste explained the process for the traffic modeling as well as responding to Commissioner Weber's comments. She also pointed out there was one correction for a model in the EIR that was not accurately reflected in the exhibit; regarding Harrison Street currently being proposed by the County as an eight -lane roadway to handle East Valley traffic. She went into detail on the City of Coachella's General Plan and the letter from Endo Engineering. General discussion followed regarding: • Traffic volume and projections reflective of the land use designations • Madison street model peak hour trip volume • Avenues 60, 62 and Jefferson Street future traffic projection Chairwoman Barrows commented on: • The clarification of whether the air quality was mitigatable and SCAQMD's comment on mitigation of air quality • Stating that City is doing everything possible to reduce impacts on air quality • AQMD proposed air quality measures and the City's efforts to address them Ms. Criste explained the types of air quality analysis and why each was utilized, as well as conclusions in the staff report and EIR. She further discussed future emission reductions and directed the Commissioners to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. General discussion followed on: • Mitigation of potential impacts and proposed development • Improvements in technology and reduction of emissions • The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan There being no applicant, as this is a City project, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any public comment. 269 -3- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Mr. Ulrich Sauerbrey, 74-948 Live Oak, Indian Wells, representing Travertine Corporation, introduced himself and read a statement which covered: • Background on his work with the Travertine project • The submittal of a revised specific plan for the project • The engineering challenges and analysis of the infrastructure to serve that area • Two roads, on the former Specific Plan, versus three on the General Plan • The applicant's views on access and circulation being shared with staff and the suggestion of waiting for submittal of their specific plan to address these issues • Advising the Commission that Travertine is actively studying these matters and are engaged with the City, Riverside Fire and other agency staff to evaluate and resolve the challenges of their property. General comments, from Mr. Sauerbrey, included: • The two streets previously mentioned; including the Jefferson to Avenue 62 connection • General description of the previous specific plan • Current status of the project • Hydrology challenges • Ingress/Egress • Submittal of written comments to staff • Reference to an e-mail and response noting a policy, identified in the Circulation Element, allowing for some modifications to be considered by the Public Works Director • Staff's participation in the background and review of this project • Requirements for future changes in the General Plan documents City Attorney Jenson made a point of clarification on comments made, at this meeting, by Mr. Sauerbrey and the public. She stated they would not be included in the Final EIR as the comment period had already closed. The comments could be responded to in staff reports. Mrs. Neeta Quinn — 78-440 Via Sevilla, introduced herself and referred to her letter (in the Commission packet) and asked if the Commissioners had received a copy of her response. 270 4- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Planning Director Johnson stated there were two letters received from residents to which staff responded and were distributed electronically, several hours before the meeting. He then distributed copies of Mrs. Quinn's response to the Commissioners. Mrs. Quinn said she received the response at 5:06 p.m. and did not have adequate time to research and prepare a thorough response. She then commented on her concerns of some of the items in the e-mail: • Opposition to the General Plan and concern with the Sustainable Community section • She read the statement that "the Sustainable Community Element is not a State -mandated element, but is an element that La Quinta believes is important" • She stated she was concerned with its inclusion and reference to the United Nations Agenda 21 and the definition of sustainability from their report of the World Commission on Environment and Development • She asked whose decision was it to have this become a part of the General Plan as the sustainable community element was part of Agenda 21. She read several statements from the United Nations Agenda 21 document • She commented on who had adopted Agenda 21 • She read portions of the United Nations Biodiversity Assessment Report and referenced comments on Page 143 of the Sustainability Community Element • She requested the decision be tabled to allow time for the City to learn about the history of sustainability, where it came from and its association to the United Nations Agenda 21 • She pointed out that Temecula and Rancho Cucamonga had opted out • She was concerned about government intrusion • She noted there was a flyer included in her letter and she would be distributing it throughout the community • She said she would be addressing the Concerned Citizens of La Quinta meeting on September 17, 2012 and the City Council on September 18, 2012. Commissioner Barrows thanked Mrs. Quinn for her comments and said she had never heard of Agenda 21. However, she said what the City was trying to do was make this a more livable community, as well as 271 B1c Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 manage our resources in an intelligent, efficient and cost-effective and economically viable way. She added that approach made sense for the community and had nothing to do with what the United Nations was doing. It was to make La Quinta a better community. There being no further public comment, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for Commission discussion. General discussion followed on: • Concerns of the Planning Commission and Council having to follow government regulations in California • Having a plan for the future • Planning for the basic needs for the community • Education of the public and participation in the updating of the General Plan. • Equestrian areas • Air quality There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2012-015 recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2010- 121, and Environmental Assessment 2012-622 as submitted. Unanimously approved. B. Village Use Permit 2012-046: a request by Michel Despras — Lavender Bistro — for consideration of a Village Use Permit for the expansion of an existing storage building at Lavender Bistro, located at 78-073 Calle Barcelona. Assistant Planner Eric Ceja presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson commented on: • Any concerns from neighbors. • Addition possibly effecting parking Staff responded there were no responses from the neighbors and the addition had no effect on the parking requirements. 272 Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 201'2 There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Mr. Michel Despras, 78-073 Calle Barcelona, introduced himself and said most of the addition was for storage and should have no impact on parking. He then explained why the addition was needed. General discussion followed on: • Landscaping update and additions • The roofline and transition • Compatibility to the current building Chairwoman Barrows asked the applicant if he was satisfied with the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Despras said he was. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any public comment. There being none, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for Commission discussion. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Weber/Wright to adopt Resolution 2012- 016 recommending approval of Village Use Permit 2012-046 as submitted. Unanimously approved. C. Conditional Use Permit 2012-144: a request by LMLQ Properties, LLC for consideration of an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to expand restaurant operations and additional seating at the restaurant located at 47-474 Caleo Bay Drive - northeast corner of Washington Street and Lake La Quinta Drive. Assistant Planner Eric Ceja presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. 273 -7- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Weber commented on: • Hours of operation and evening restrictions • The parking agreement • Outdoor dining Commissioner Wilkinson commented on: • Distance to the nearest residents. Commissioner Alderson commented on: • Location of additional parking • Pedestrian crosswalks and the possible risk of crossing at night • Any comments from the neighbors Staff responded there were no comments from the neighboring residents. There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Mr. Lee Morcus, owner, 47-474 Washington Street, introduced himself, expressed his pleasure in working with City staff, and commented on the improvement of the building. He explained the type of restaurant this was intended to be; primarily dinner but he would like the flexibility of serving lunch if the market demanded it. He explained the Parking Agreement and stated it was planned to be for staff first and valet second; with female staff being escorted at night. He preferred the guests to be parking closest to the restaurant and not across the street. General discussion followed on: • The use of the outdoor patio • The restaurant name • Landscaping improvements • Exterior improvements 274 s- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Commissioner Wright reiterated the concerns about the safety of crossing to the additional parking. Planning Director Johnson responded by explaining the low volume of traffic and the criteria for establishment of crosswalks. Mr. Morcus stated they were considering constructing a small walkway that extended from their parking lot down towards a handicap ramp; which was proposed to go right on to Lake La Quinta Drive (in 2002). They plan to put a small walkway from that ramp to the La Quinta Medical Center property. He will then ask his employees to use the walkway to free up the nearby restaurant parking area. Staff responded they had not seen a plan for the walkway, but the applicant could certainly address this with the Public Works staff. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any public comment. There being no public comment, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for Commission discussion. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Wilkinson/Weber to adopt Resolution 2012-017 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2012- 144 as submitted with the recommendation that the applicant work with staff to address any issues on a mid -block crossing to the adjacent parking area. Unanimously approved. D. Conditional Use Permit 2012-142:, a request by Crown Castle — Susan Makinson - for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for a Single - Pole Distributed Antenna System (DAS) at the southeast corner of the Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 Roundabout. Assistant Planner Eric Ceja presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. 275 a Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 Commissioner Weber asked about the prioritization for co -location on existing poles. Staff explained about the telecommunications ordinance update and how it affected this application. There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Susan Makinson, representative of Crown Castle, 5350 N. 48`" Street, Ste. 308, Chandler, AZ 85226 introduced herself and said staff originally directed them to look for existing verticality and in this location they found several options which were presented in the report. She then offered to answer any questions. General discussion followed on: • Replacement of the current street light and light levels. • Replacement of the street light pole. Commissioner Barrows asked the applicant if they had any problems with the Conditions of Approval and the applicant responded they did not. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any public comment. Shaina Rider — 52205 Desert Spoon Court, in Codorniz — had a question as to why they picked the developed corner as it would have been better, from an aesthetic point of view, to choose an undeveloped corner. Chairwoman Barrows asked for verification of public notification of the meeting and staff responded it had been done and they had received a number of counter visits and phone calls on this site; primarily from Codorniz property owners. Ms. Makinson then expanded on the location, and the cost of locating on that particular site. She explained there were existing underground facilities, and available verticality to utilize on that corner. 270 Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 There being no further public comment, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for Commission discussion. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2012-018 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2012- 142 as submitted. Unanimously approved. E. Conditional Use Permit 2012-143: a request by Crown Castle — Susan Makinson - for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for a Single Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the public right-of-way near the intersection of Avenue 50 and Heatherglen. Assistant Planner Eric Ceja presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. He noted there was a correction of the pole location which was on the west side of Heatherglen; not the east side. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioners Wright and Wilkinson commented on: • Comments from neighbors in Painted Cove and the Estancias. • Aesthetic impacts of pole location. General discussion followed on: • Improving the appearance of this cell tower. • Verticality on Avenue 50 and the inability to locate on IID equipment. • Camouflaging by landscaping. • Reduction of the pole height. • Search for alternate sites. There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Susan Makinson, representative of Crown Castle, 5350 N. 481" Street, Ste. 308, Chandler, AZ 85226 introduced herself and commented on the difficulties with this site. She then explained what was necessary in locating a specific site. She said the anchor tenant was Metro PCS r 277 Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 and they were proposing a multi -tenant network, on one pole, for many providers. She said they did consider a flag pole or alternate sites but were restricted to a specific area. She then explained some of the alternate sites and the problems with each. General discussion followed on: • The 22-foot height limitation • Remaining in the right-of-way • Future applications • Equipment cannot be placed on street lights or signals due to risk and liability. • Preferred sites. Ms. Makinson explained they recently did a small attachment which would fit on the top of the traffic pole that might work. Planning Director Johnson suggested the Commission might consider continuing the matter to allow staff to work further with the applicant. He suggested they keep this option in mind after they complete their discussion. There being no further questions of the applicant, Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any public comment. Ms. Grace Palock - on behalf of the Estancias - 50-001 Orchard Lane read comments submitted by their Homeowners Association Board. She pointed out the notice showed the map in the wrong location and asked why it could not be placed in another location as this site was directly behind their homeowners. Their recommendation was the Commission request additional sites be looked at and suggested the Boys and Girls Club, Jefferson Street, or Avenue 50 where there were street lights. The current site would negatively impact their development. Mr. John Mercer - 79-360 Briarwood said he listened to the applicant talk about what they could do at the roundabout at Avenue 52 and it seemed there were better locations to put this cell tower. He suggested the lights at the Boys and Girls Club and suggested there were plenty of places with light poles, such as baseball fields, and soccer fields available nearby which could be utilized; especially with today's technology. He said it did not seem that one cell phone 216 -12- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 company should have priority versus multiple people who are homeowners since there were better alternatives. Dan Schweizer, Government Relations Counsel for Crown Castle, 2125 Wright Avenue, Suite C-9, Laverne CA 91750 said he wanted to make sure the Commission understood how the DAS system worked; which he then explained. He clarified why this cell tower could not be put on private property. General discussion followed on: • The feasibility of locating the pole on private property • Crown Castle is considered an infrastructure and they have the right to be in the right-of-way • The unit is designed to work with a network • Frequencies Chairwoman Barrows left the public hearing portion of the meeting open to allow the matter to be continued. After further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wright to continue the Conditional Use Permit 2012-12 to the October 9, 2012 meeting to allow time for the applicant to work with staff on alternate locations, construction and installation. Unanimously approved. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS A. None VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: A. None. Vill. COMMISSIONER ITEMS: A. Report on the City Council Meeting of August 7, 2012.. B. Commissioner Alderson is scheduled to report back on the September 18, 2012, City Council meeting. lk 273 13- Planning Commission Minutes September 11, 2012 C. Follow-up regarding Conditional Use Permit 2003-075, Amendment 2, Milan Institute Expansion. IX: DIRECTOR ITEMS: A. APA Planning Conference in October. X. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to the next regular meeting to be held on September 25, 2012. This regular meeting was adjourned at 10:09 p.m. on September 11, 2012. Respectfully submitted, 64& Carolyker, Executive Secretary City of La Quinta, California 280 -14- Department Report: I A Lam •c �^ 1 � �' lurcam� 4J cE`N OF'r'9 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manag� DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Department Report - Response to Public Comments The following public comments were made at the October 2, 2012 City Council meeting: 1. Neeta Quinn, La Quinta, thanked Planning Director Johnson for his letter with regard to the "sustainable community" element in the City's proposed General Plan. 2. David Archer, 79869 Dick Allan Drive, La Quinta, stated in Mark Moran's absence, he would be answering any questions on behalf of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce. it 2:1 Department Report: 16 a, OF TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Project Status Report - September 2012 Activities for Service Delivery Options - Phase 1 On August 7, 2012, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Henson Consulting Group (HCG) to facilitate a municipal services delivery option review. The purpose was to engage professionals from outside of the City to work with the Executive Team to review all City services and operations, and to generate service delivery options for City Council and community consideration. One commitment of this engagement is to provide the City Council with monthly project status reports. This transmittal provides a summary of phase one activities for the month of September. • During the first three weeks in September, the Department Directors worked across departments to prepare detailed suggestions for restructuring departments and reducing costs. HCG provided guidance as needed to individual Directors. • On September 11, HCG met individually with the Department Directors and with the new Finance Director, Robbeyn Bird (her second day of work). Ms. Bird was updated on the key elements of the Service Delivery Options effort and the importance of her role to achieve the desired results. Frank Spevacek and HCG also met to review the City's budget and to assess critical service delivery concerns (information technology needs and priorities, and development service staffing and service options). 282 • On September 23 HCG led a half -day working session with the Executive Team. Topics included: o Trends in local government service delivery. o The status of the City's revenues and expenditures. o Clarifying the Mission, Vision, and Core Values generated by the Executive Team. o The Department Directors presenting two alternative service delivery strategies that encompassed a new organization structure, department staffing alternatives and associated costs. The City Manager, HCG and the Department Directors critiqued these options, and the Department Directors were assigned to refine these strategies, to consider bolder options, and to identify additional cost savings. The Executive Team and HCG are next scheduled to undertake the following: • October 10 - The Executive Team met to review the refined service delivery strategies developed by the Department Directors (as a result of the September 23`d direction), and to further evaluate the levels of service, organization structure, department staffing alternatives, and cost. • October 15 - Three Directors: Public Works, Building and Planning, will travel to Newport Beach and will review how the City of Newport Beach effectively consolidated its customer service counters and increased the number of "over the counter" plan check activities. • October 22 - The City Manager will convene an all hands meeting with City staff to provide an update regarding the service delivery options activities, and HCG will be conducting a staff training seminar on effective meeting management. • October 29 - HCG will be conducting a training session involving the Department Directors regarding on effective communications. The Executive Team will then be meeting to review the City Manager's refinements to the two alternative service delivery strategies prepared by the Department Directors. • The Finance Director, City Manager and HCG will also be assessing the City's information technology systems to identify hardware and software constraints. Regarding the schedule, the Executive Team is on track to present the service delivery options recommendations to the City Council at the December 4, 2012 Council meeting. 283 Department Report: I G c&'.r^F4Q" MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Debbie Powell, Economic Development/Housing Manager-,CQL&� DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Oversight Board Meeting Update Report The Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to La Quinta Redevelopment Agency held a regular meeting on October 3, 2012. Six Board Members were present; one absent. A Public Comment Session was held by the Oversight Board in order to receive public comments regarding the Low -Moderate Income Housing Fund Due Diligence Review ("DDR") pursuant to AB 1484. No public comment was received. AB 1484 requires the DDR be transmitted to the County Auditor -Controller, the State Controller's Office, and the DOF at the same time it is transmitted to the Oversight Board. This is to allow for comment/input from the County Auditor/Controller. The DDR was submitted to all parties on September 27, 2012. The County Auditor -Controller's office contacted staff and indicated they had no further input. The Oversight Board will hold a special meeting on October 10, 2012 to approve the DDR by Resolution. Items considered and approved unanimously by the Oversight Board include: A Resolution of the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to La Quinta Redevelopment Agency approving the Successor Agency Administrative Budget for the Period of January 2013 through June The Oversight Board approved Resolution No. OB 2012-015, as submitted. 284 Informational items included: 1. Update on Department of Finance Review of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for January 2013 through June 2013 2. Update Regarding City and Successor Agency Property Transactions Pertaining to SilverRock Resort, Highway 111 Retail Property and Other Public Properties The Oversight Board had no questions on the informational items. Staff posted the Action Minutes for DOF review on the same day (Attachment 1). The five business -day window for the DOF to call up Oversight Board actions for review has passed; therefore, according to AB 1484, the action is deemed approved by the DOF. Attachment: 1. Oversight Board Action Minutes of October 3, 2012 2u� ATTACHMENT 1 OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION MINUTES Regular Meeting WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2012 at 2:00 P.M. ROLL CALL - Present: Board Members Marshall, Maysels, McDaniel, Nelson, Osborne and Chairperson Pena Absent: Board Member Ellis - Board voted unanimously to excuse Board Member Ellis CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed with one addition from staff regarding future meeting dates. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. A motion was made by Board Members Marshall/Nelson to approve the minutes from the August 8, 2012 Oversight Board meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENT SESSION 1. Receive Public Comments Regarding Low -Moderate Income Housing Fund Due Diligence Review Pursuant to AB 1484 No public comment. BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Successor Agency Administrative Budget for January 2013 through June 2013 A motion was made by Nelson/McDaniel to adopt Resolution No. OB 2012- 015, a Resolution of the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Adopting the Successor Agency Administrative Budget for January 2013 through June 2013. 260 RESOLUTION NO. OB 2012-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 2013 THROUGH JUNE 2013 Motion carried 6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent. FUTURE MEETING DATES Staff indicated that the October 17, 2012, November 7, 2012 and November 21" meetings will be cancelled. However, the Oversight Board will need to hold a special meeting on Wednesday, October 10, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. to approve the Low -Moderate Income Housing Fund Due Diligence Review Pursuant to AB 1484. ADJOURNMENT — 2:18 p.m. A motion was made by Board Members Maysels/Osborne to adjourn. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lori Lafond Oversight Board Secret ry OVERSIGHT BOARD ACTION MINUTES 2 OCOTBER 3, 2012 2 3 7 OCTOBER 16 OCTOBER 17 OCTOBER 18 OCTOBER 25 OCTOBER 27 NOVEMBER 6 NOVEMBER 6 NOVEMBER 7 NOVEMBER 12 NOVEMBER 20 NOVEMBER 21 NOVEMBER 22 & 23 DECEMBER 4 DECEMBER 5 DECEMBER 7 DECEMBER 15 DECEMBER 18 DECEMBER 19 DECEMBER 24 DECEMBER 25 DECEMBER 31 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 3A CITY COUNCILS UPCOMING EVENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING - CANCELLED GREAT SHAKE OUT CVEP ECONOMIC SUMMIT AT ESMERALDA DOCUMENT SHRED DAY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ELECTION DAY OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING - CANCELLED CITY HALL CLOSED - VETERANS DAY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING - CANCELLED CITY HALL CLOSED -THANKSGIVING CITY COUNCIL MEETING OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OVERSIGHT BOARD MEETING CITY HALL CLOSES AT NOON - CHRISTMAS CITY HALL CLOSED - CHRISTMAS CITY HALL CLOSES AT NOON - NEW YEARS EVE 288 October 2012 Monthly Planner 1 2 3 4 S 6 10:00 AM Transp. 3:00 PM City 2:00 PM Over- 12 W PM Mayors Lunch Henderson Council Meeting sight Board 4:00 PM- 6:00 PM CARDF DATES FORUM M Meeting TRILOGY 6:00 PM an Energy GMo-Franklin 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10:00 AM Pub. Sfty. 7:00 PM Panning 2:00 PM SPECI- 11:00AA1 CVCC-EVMS Henderson Commission AL OVER- 12:00 PM EnergylEmimn. 6.30 PM Carnmunily SeM Commgabn SIGHT BOARD -EVANS 6:00 PM League. MEETING Henderson 4:00 PM Imestmem Advisory Board 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3:00 PM City 10:00 AM Romelasenm c� �S�E 9:00 AM Great 9:00 AM c XE rs Council Meeting 2:00 PM Over- Shake Out sight Board 100 PM Historic Purser. Meeting vation Commission -CANCELLED 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00 PM Panning 12:00 PM Salim -Adolph CVEP Economic 7:00 AM - 11:00 Commission Summit - AM Document Shred Day @ City Hall 28 29 30 31 4:30 PM Exec Grate, Adolph September November S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 10/4/2012 289 November 2012 Monthly Planner 1 2 3 October December S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 IS 16 17 IB 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 '26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 30 31 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10:00 AM Tramp. 3:00 PM City 2.00 PM Over- 9:ao AM M'""1 camPuo- Frank, Henderson Council Meetng Sight Board 11:00 AM CVCC-EVANS 6:00 PM IID Energy Cm FranMN Meeting 12:00 PM frergylEmhon. CANCELLED -EVABS ELECTION DAY 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10:00 AM Pub. Sfty- 7:00 PM Palming 4:00 PM Imestmmt 3:00 PM Historic Passer- a:ao AM CVaEvam Henderson Cmmnlssion Advisory Board vatian cammusim 3:00 PM Mtns. VETERANS DAY- Consonsaacy+radlin CITY HALL 6'30 PM Community Servkes Comma n CLOSED 6:00 PM Inagm- TOMORROW Henderson - CITY HALL. CLOSED - VETER- ANS DAY 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 3:00 PM City Council Meeting 10:00 AM Nomm.ssness Conte-0SBORNE 2:00 PM Over- . sight Board Meeting Thanksgiving & Thanksgiving & CANCELLED Day After (City Hall CLOSED) Day After (City HAICLOSED) 25 26 27 28 29 30 4:30 PM Exec Conte: 7:00 PM Pimping 1200 PM Swb"dolph Adolph Commission Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 10/42012 290 December 2012 Monthly Planner . ... . .. . .. .. . 1 2 3 .4 5 6 7 8 10:00 AM Tramp. . 3:00 PM City 2:00 PM Over- 12 DO PM Mayers Lunch 6:00 PM CHRIST- Henderson 6'00 PM IID Energy Council Meeting sight Board MAS TREE Crn. ranwin Meeting LIGHTING 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10:00 AM Pub. Sfty. 7:00 PM PHmrind 4:00 PM ImestmeM 11:00 AM CVCF. EVANs Household Hazar- HeMerow commission Advisory Board 12:00 PM Eneryy/Emirms dous Waste 6:30 PM community, s.rawaecommh.wn -EVANS Collection 6:00 PM Isag1M- Henderson 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3:00 PM City 10:00 AM Homelemnesv BORNE CrnbCouncil 3:00 PM Historic Pear 9:00 AM CVA-Eva. meeting:00 200 I POvvecr- ration cannlission sight Board Meeting 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 7:00 PM Plannbry 1200 PM SmdaM-Adolpb commission Christmas Eve - City Hall Closes at Noon r Christmas Day - City Hall Closed 30 31 4.30 PM Exec Cae: Adolph. November 12 January 13 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 New Years Eve -City Closes at Noon Printed by Calendar Creator Plus on 10/4/2012 291 DEPARTMENT REPORT:) 13 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Maysels, City Clerk DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Annual Dinner for Police Department Volunteer For many years, the City has honored Police and Fire department volunteers with a recognition dinner. Recently, the Fire Department discontinued the firefighter volunteer program so this year's event will focus on the Police Department volunteers. Funds for the event were approved as part of the Police Department budget. The event is held in November every year. Taking into account Council's meeting schedule, election week, and allowing time to coordinate the event, the following dates are offered for your consideration: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 Wednesday, November 14, 2012 Thursday, November 15, 2012 Staff will proceed with the arrangements immediately upon selection of dates by the City Council. 29? Department Report: VERBAL 10/16/2012 3G � T 10 OF TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Maysels, City Clerk DATE: October 15, 2012 SUBJECT: Appointment of a Representative to the Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District The City of La Quinta has had a citizen representative on the Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District (CVMVCD) Board of Trustees since January 2009. Prior to 2009 a Councilmember or former Councilmember represented the City on this Board. The current representative, Robert Cox, was appointed by Council from a pool of three applicants in late 2008 for a two-year term. In late 2010, Mr. Cox was reappointed by Council for another two-year term, which ends January 2013. The Board meets once a month and a stipend of $100 per month is paid to Trustees who attend. During his four years as a Trustee, Mr. Cox missed two meetings, both of which were excused absences. For the past two years, Mr. Cox has served as Treasurer of the Board and Chair of the Finance Committee. Health and Safety Code Section 2022(d) provides that persons appointed to the Board should have "experience, training, and education in fields that will assist them in the governance" of the District. Health and Safety Code Section 2024 states that the "term of office for a member of the board of trustees shall be for a term of two or four years, at the discretion of the appointing authority. Terms of office commence at noon on the first Monday in January." Staff is requesting direction from the City Council regarding the preferred term duration and method for selecting the next appointee. Council may increase the term from two to four years and/or (a) reappoint Mr. Cox, (b) appoint a Councilmember as the City's representative, or (c) direct staff to solicit applications for the appointment. 11 29J DEPARTMENT REPORT: TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Director DATE: October 16, 2012 RE: Department Report — September 2012 Attached please find the statistical summaries for building permits, Animal Control, Code Compliance, and garage sale permits for the month of September. The statistical summaries depict the following highlights: • Year-to-date building permit valuation is $44,663,797 which includes the issuance of 95 building permits in September; • Animal Control handled 355 cases in September; • Code Compliance initiated 217 cases in September; • Code Compliance completed 186 cases in September; • Garage sale permits generated $1120 revenue in September. it 294 OA U a� J.j � LL 0a �Z M Z C J M m C: ... 0 N n m N C4 0_.�ID Ln ( N �N 0 al ( M ^ N N '1 b 00 N N M a CO a O n, A (A in OC N io rl Lf O Ln t0 I N 0 m n m 0 a N l Of N l l M 7 n .l N .+ 10 jjj 00 ; jp !O I M 00 ( M O� n n M O 01 O1 OD n� Of O> v M I N I � 'I 10 1 � �. i l 0o N i .�i .�i ;. .ai "1 14 .4 , E �i i°- y N I p N N ei r4 1 M N M 0 1 M rl M rl M Ian1 w j c M N 0 M O l a( n CA I of 110 , In In a 0 n N w O O a M a l m a 01 0 .� .-. .4 I O O N n a a N kD j a n O 0 0 �0 N N O r. N ti i% I N a F N 0 : .d N 1 7� m( CA n 4 M O N N I a O 0 0 A A N b 1 M iM N I N W rl O N O M M O 4 N N M a s M N M N N M M o E I i - j rn in o a M 0 N Fn n a a� G .oi 0' .+ .Oi .Ni .ai V4 .+ ( "I .Ni "I ( 0 N 0{ M �. -_M In m N n N a Ln ( 00. U. h N a �Dt0 nm a r ni 0% Ch ( .y O In N 0 N b 0 O b b N M M In n \D n I R ( Of ti ( M 'i IB B N,' 10 N I1 M j 7 n j •1 m •o N In I a O` 0% {0 0 b O M n %D a N n Co 1 10 co 0 N G I F 1 _.... It 14 to at In Ol y 1p N a N In n In N .0i CO M � a� a of i o �' � •• � oa i > a o w i_v. 1 0- 2 9 5 0. . . . . r+. . rl . Ul 0 O m . I(. Ol O N <JJ /"� m m O 111 m O� N N Ill O N nl N P O O w m O� lD Ol O IIl N N If1 O O m O AI N m O P w N N r-1 m P I(1 P N p a az� 5 Ol N r O O O N N O O ltl Ol �O O p U1 m M a N M O d od .. q a w a cn F �O ry m N �D r Vl N P r lfl n «l N p p N P w W ' d• aN N N O d N Q ; ' m Ol O O N 111 N l0 N N O O .-I O O rJ O 1p Vl ' ' . . . . rvl Vl Vl . . . . . lD O r P O . W ry W w d .4 W I W I p r 1p l!) p N m m p p r1 O �0 l+t O1 01 O P nF n nN r In vl 0 M H N -I F f F Z ' a oaW F I -I T d q O CJ O Q� n O N ry O N N O Vl P O r O O D aH In Oa rvNN Nnrnmpmorvry lnoo �o a a ..q lnmm ul �o lmm�pno ulr pNo r d N a b a> �O N rl N O m N l0 Vl N P m Ol q\ q Ui d a N N P Al 1l1 m N r w z o• m oON \ O N 4 U mF+ F F of m ' F pQ� NNpmlflr mr�o �o onlmmN m m o a N N N rv� N m u w f N 4 W F w F d O z d w w W W�f H TmF (/1 N�nNN pmvlr Norl �orvnrvpN ul a amd d• w oaw a woo ' w W a 4 F O F O W T w U Q z F W O a O a a r 5 a m a F yy ' 44 ai a s 4 4 H O Q N w x UZ a zua F'Z to w 4 W O ' wo x w awN a aN Z�+ F a W OF U wF Ym o sNz z xu O W f W W F W a ua a 0w0 in oa F w a V a z d wXaaw m oz j F z z z u u u o o a V a oow zzuzaa wz �aa 4 O F F\ H Q O MOO O« a U, a I aoUT ooaaaza>u F p g a f W U H f f 0 w 0 a a W w la wwawawaawwowa.,oHd o •u aaaww�ddaaaaommv,w r a :LOUT U z mz d uaawawaauwdaw.,00d U 4 Q 4 m w w f d d a a a tt W m m cn m City of La Quinta Building Statistics For the period 9/1/2012 thru 9/30/2012 App # I Permit Date I Type Address Job Value Fees Assessed 689 9/7/2012 ADDITION - COMMERCIAL 78-121 AVENIDA LA FONDA 5,2011 204.78 1 5,201 204.78 389 9/12/2012 ADDITION - RESIDENTIAL 57-595 SOUTH VALLEY LN 42,097 708.53 494 9/13/2012 ADDITION - RESIDENTIAL 79-770 CITRUS 46,766 853.39 590 9/17/2012 ADDITION - RESIDENTIAL 77-030 AVENIDA FERNANDO 13,333 329.06 830 9/17/2012 ADDITION - RESIDENTIAL 53-749 VIA PISA 35,000 572.74 916 9/10/2012 ADDITION - RESIDENTIAL 56-965 MERION 30,000 624.17 5 169,196 3,087.89 848 9/24/2012 WALL/FENCE 48-801 SAN LUCAS ST 2,133 54.00 1010 9/4/2012 WALL/FENCE 77-511 CALLE ARROBA 2,500 54.00 1025 9/17/2012 WALL/FENCE 53-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 5,375 81.00 1036 9/11/2012 WALL/FENCE 53-790 AVENIDA ALVARADO 2,000 45.00 1043 9/12/2012 WALL/FENCE 54455 AVENIDA RUBIO 1,429 35.00 1044 9/12/2012 WALL/FENCE 54-255 AVENIDA HERRERA 2,773 54.00 1079 9/20/2012 WALL/FENCE 51-060 MANDARINA 3,275 63.00 1087 9/24/2012 WALL/FENCE 51-983 AVENIDA CORTEZ 2,850 54.00 1135 9/26/2012 WALL/FENCE 53-408 VIA PALACIO 4,216 72.00 1139 9/27/2012 WALL/FENCE 56-235 VILLAGE DR 455 15.00 1140 9/27/2012 WALL/FENCE 78-405 COYOTE CANYON CT 1,125 29.00 11 28,131 556.00 1055 9/17/2012 1 DEMO - COMML/OTHER 53-275 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 01 45.00 1 0 45.00 1045 9/12/2012 JELECTRICAL 51-230 EISENHOWER DR 12,5001 45.00 1084 9/21/2012 ELECTRICAL 79-175 RANCHO LA QUINTA C 1,000 33.50 1129 9/24/2012 ELECTRICAL 54-255 AVENIDA HERRERA 5001 21.56 1130. 9/25/2012 ELECTRICAL 53-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 1,1001 44.25 4 5,100 144.31 1013 9/4/2012 MECHANICAL 79-420 CALLE VISTA VERDE 7,000 39.38 1014 9/4/2012 MECHANICAL 52-435 AVENIDA VALLEJO 12,737 41.25 1016 9/5/2012 MECHANICAL 60-959 FIRE BARREL DR 5,000 41.25 1038 9/11/2012 MECHANICAL 49-040 MARIMBA DR 9,825 50.63 1039 9/11/2012 MECHANICAL 80-272 RIVIERA 17,106 82.50 1042 9/12/2012 MECHANICAL 49-311 AVENIDA VISTA BONII 3,950 41.25 1047 9/13/2012 MECHANICAL 81-230 GOLF VIEW DR 8,941 50.63 1049 9/13/2012 MECHANICAL 79-085 VIA SAN CLARA 6,565 50.63 1050 9/13/2012 MECHANICAL 44-631 LIBERTY AVE 3,700 30.00 1059 9/17/2012 MECHANICAL 49-745 ANACAPA C I R 7,520 39.38 1060 9/17/2012 MECHANICAL 78-730 SANITA DR 4,985 30.00 aye i 29i City of La Quinta Building Statistics For the period 9/1/2012 thru 9/30/2012 1076 9/19/2012 MECHANICAL 55-198 SHOAL CREEK 6,248 39.38 1109 9/24/2012 MECHANICAL 78-725 BOTTLE BRUSH DR 4,500 50.63 1110 9/24/2012 MECHANICAL 78-705 AVENIDA LA FONDA 4,500 50.63 1122 9/24/2012 MECHANICAL 50-035 CALLE ROSARITA 7,250 39.38 1142 9/27/2012 MECHANICAL 55-555 SOUTHERN HILLS 10,000 82.50 1146 9/28/2012 MECHANICAL 53-220 AVENIDA MENDOZA 5,000 50.63 1147 9/28/2012 IMECHANICAL 79-311 TOM FAZIO LN 11,5001 82.50 18 136,327 892.55 1024 9/7/2012 PATIO COVER - RESIDENTIAL 52-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 2,261 89.10 1058 9/17/2012 PATIO COVER - RESIDENTIAL 78-615 FORBES CIR 5,027 133.65 1071 9/26/2012 PATIO COVER - RESIDENTIAL 78-845 LA PALMA DR 1,463 57.75 1096 9/24/2012 PATIO COVER - RESIDENTIAL 60-445 STAGHORN DR 2,979 89.10 1097 9/24/2012 PATIO COVER - RESIDENTIAL 81-656 BRITTLEBUSH LN 3,990 103.95 5 15,720 473.55 1011 9/4/2012 PLUMBING 55-405 FIRESTONE 800 22.50 1021 9/6/2012 PLUMBING 52-050 AVENIDA OBREGON 250 28.13 1023 9/7/2012 PLUMBING 52-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 150 37.50 1037 9/11/2012 PLUMBING 52-140 AVENIDA OBREGON 2,500 30.00 1048 9/13/2012 PLUMBING 48-901 AVENIDA ANSELMO 900 22.50 1057 9/17/2012 PLUMBING 78-257 SCARLET CT 7001 28.13 1067 9/18/2012 1PLUMBING 54-065 AVENIDA CARRANZA 3,0001 30.00 7 8,300 198.76 779 9/7/2012 REMODEL - COMMERCIAL 7474 WASHINGTON ST 400,3501 3,445.64 938 9/24/2012 1 REMODEL - COMMERCIAL 78-370 HIGHWAY 111 13,5001 218.95 2 403,850 3,664.59 931 9/11/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 46-109 ROADRUNNER LN 6,396 197.54 933 9/11/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 80-055 MERION 11,000 207.90 1012 9/17/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 47-646 CALEO BAY 11,383 279.64 1022 9/17/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 53-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 22,000 537.11 1026 9/12/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 45-245 SEELEY DR 2,000 151.76 1028 9/12/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 45-245 SEELEY DR 2,000 151.76 1029 9/12/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 45-245 SEELEY DR 2,000 151.76 1034 9/10/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 78-975 DEL MONTE CT 4,772 118.80 1061 9/18/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 51-595 AVENIDA MENDOZA 400 24.75 1131 9/25/2012 REMODEL - RESIDENTIAL 52-080 AVENIDA MARTINEZ 2,500 73.69 10 64,451 1,894.71 915 9/4/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 61-232 CACTUS SPRING DR 1 25,0001 560.80 1027 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 78-271 DEACON DR 27,0001 567.25 1030 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 57-061 MERION 38,0001 685,23 aye 4 298 City of La Quinta Building Statistics For the period 9/1/2012 thru 9/30/2012 1032 9/10/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 61-805 MESA CT 29,000 588.70 1033 9/10/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 81-249 RED ROCK RD 31,500 635.88' 1054 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 81-020 GOLF VIEW DR 30,000 618,43 1064 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 79-850 TANGELO 27,000 567.25 1065 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 51-090 MANDARINA 25,000 545.80 1066 9/18/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 60-162 ANGORA CT 32,000 620.88 1068 9/20/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 79-100 SHADOW TR 40,000 721.68 1080 9/25/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 53-600 AVENIDA CARRANZA 16,000 412.15 1081 9/25/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 77-655 AVENIDA MONTEZUM 16,000 412.15 1082 9/25/2012 POOL - RESIDENTIAL 53-520 AVENIDA RAMIREZ 16,800 427.00 13 353,300 7,363.20 1056 9/17/2012 RE -ROOF 48-801 SAN PEDRO ST 15,000 30.00 1069 9/18/2012 RE -ROOF 49-803 ADELITO DR 14,477 30.00 1070 9/18/2012 RE -ROOF 49-805 ADELITO DR 14,477 30.00 1074 9/19/2012 RE -ROOF 49-793 COACHELLA DR 8,805 30.00 1133 9/25/2012 RE -ROOF 53-935 AVENIDA VILLA 6,000 30.00 1141 9/27/2012 RE -ROOF 52-565 AVENIDA VALLEJO 1,3001 30.00 6 60,059 180.00 400 9/17/2012 IDWELLING - SINGLE FAMILY DETAC 77-355 CALLE POTRERO 170,964 2,004.99 412 9/14/2012 IDWELLING - SINGLE FAMILY DETAC 53-544 VIA DONA 384,2831 3,481.62 2 555,247 5,486.61 1052 9/14/2012 SIGN 47-150 WASHINGTON ST 1,800 30.00 1053 9/14/2012 SIGN 78-370 HIGHWAY 111 1,200 30.00 1137 9/26/2012 SIGN 44-025 JEFFERSON ST 4,2001 33.00 3 7,200 93.00 796 9/10/2012 SOLAR 49-924 VIA KATALINA 9,5791 51.57 1019 9/13/2012 ISOLAR 60-587 DESERT SHADOWS 01 5,0001 28.13 2 14,579 79.70 860 9/19/2012 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDI 81-095 MUIRFIELD VILLAGE 1 5,8001 133.65 996 9/25/2012 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDI 47-805 CALEO BAY 30,000 497.56 1008 9/25/2012 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDI 47-805 CALEO BAY 3,000 89.10 1031 9/10/2012 STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDI 49-085 VISTA ESTRELLA 2,200 89.10 4 41,000 809.41 1041 9/21/2012 ISPECIAL INSPECTION 49-499 EISENHOWER DR 1 30,0001 100.00 1 30,000 100.00 95 1,897,661 25,274.06 rages 299 9J IN Y7 O N M M O r N r O O It CO f- h M 00 0) Ih Nm N W O N N O F- l0 } O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O Z O O O O O O 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0000000 N V (ND O (O N M O iO M coO O O M—t f,7 M O M (MO 0 O Q N N co 00 N O 7 00 r V O (D m M O CD M O O O M M N Q C U] W co (D O N r n a0 NV) r V V N 7 N (O �09 to V (O M(00 O CO O O N O M N O M O W O N r O O N O n 0 O O M Q M N N N (1CI D O M M O O N r O O N O N N w M r 'V' N O N O7 N N d M (D co r O O O O co N O r _ N N Y V N O LL N O N O O T n rl N V M M (D O O O w O O CO N M N N N r- Zp U W W v% N tdi p H y M F' y Z F- Z c :.. g Z �,_ W w O ~ W d a h w a W g 0 Q f0 d w w a d d 3 Z W IL Q� (D a 2 F a m n U W W 2 F Q N O a w a Q a O a 'r E 2 a J d a 7V w UamQ O O Q aO WO aio NW Wm n A QF OQNA Z c Z E w OE Q dn loa nUn O p O O JW (n0 O O W U Z V) O Y. W J _j W z > m(D0xIO aZ_QQKO. 300 it 0) 75 0 (o0 N N M G M N C O r�� O M co M M M � O�� N La O M< N co co N N (O<� 00 <r M <L q- �m m f"F l0 } 000 O O O 000 O O O O 000000000 O O O O O O O O O Z O O O O O O 000 0000 000000000 O O O O O O O U O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000000000 o 0 0 0 0 o O nLLOO Q N N O N M o cO O 0 O000 M N O O< O O aM0 N in 0 N 'conO co M O OP ' N e- O O c M -=i M M.- N co 00 M O n N<� O O O O M O O(�O coCN La mo w M<N iy C� N�O MNM' owoO r-000 LO w N<OLOiO10 A M T Q N M M r< O N? 0 O M O O O O� coM o^ n Lo aNO N a N N O r '- co O< to GO cO 0 0 0 0 co N M N O i0 r CO ONO 7(OO NO)O orO M N�-- O oOOO V O LOMANM W N M N 0 .- co N rr V t0 r N N < < Cl LL r aD a0 M V' I� V O �n N t0 o < to cn F H a F= > m O O 0 7 O E W y N m C C C Jk C y J y a) a) 'O d ZV E FE- A F- A a y m c E a) mo a) —`° UaJa cc Q >f0 a) (o0 c ¢ _ V Z c NN > j S.c aiF3- �aiF3- at0 �E0 a3a � �QOO QmO QOO QOO_W°)�'« y w E L G F- mQU>N�OOOz¢-jOZ Z O c1F- a 301 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 5 i TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director DATE: October 16, 2012� SUBJECT: Community Services Department Report for September 2012 and the 2012/2013 Community Services Marketing Plan Upcoming events of the Community Services Department for November 2012: Computers *Digital Camera 2 *Basic Computer *Intermediate Internet and Email *Computer Lab Adobe Photoshop Elements, Senior Center Dance *Social Dance Fusion Jazz/ Hip Hop (8 -12 yrs.), La Quinta High School Pre-Ballet/Jazz (3 - 5 yrs.), Fitness Center Dance, Play & Pretend (2.5 - 5 yrs.), La Quinta High School Dance, Play & Pretend (2.5 - 5 yrs.), Fitness Center Beginning Ballet (5 - 10 yrs.), La Quinta High School Ballet/Tap (4 - 6 & 7 - 10 yrs.), La Quinta High School Excursions. Balboa Park San Diego Exercise & Fitness *Morning Workout *Mat Pilates *Zumba Gold *Yoga for Health *Chair Yoga for Seniors *Yoga of Breath & Laughter Pilates Aerobic Dance Meditation, Library Yoga AM, Library Yoga PM, Library Zumba, Senior Center Adult Walks - Tracking Nature - Stories in the Sand, Bear Creek Trail Guided Cove Hikes led by Philip Ferranti 10 3 _j Gymnastics Introductory Gymnastics (4 — 7 yrs.), Fitness Center Introductory Gymnastics (8 -10 yrs.), Fitness Center Free Programs *Quilters *Woodcarvers *Tai Chi Chuan Leisure Enrichment Italian for Everyone, Senior Center Colored Pencil Drawing, Senior Center Cartoon Drawing, Senior Center (5 — 8 yrs.), Senior Center Cartoon Drawing, Senior Center (9 - 11 yrs.), Senior Center Cartoon Drawing, Senior Center (12 - 14 yrs.), Senior Center Martial Arts Karate/ Taekwondo, Senior Center Music Beginning Guitar, Senior Center Second Level Guitar, Senior Center Special Events *Thanksgiving Luncheon Veterans Tribute Special Interest *Intermediate Bridge I *Ceramics *Expressive Landscapes in Acrylic *Creative Drawing *Let's Make Jewelry *Hooked on Loops *Beginning Ukulele Youth Sports Y Rookies (3-5 yrs.), Colonel Mitchell Paige Field Youth Flag Football League, Colonel Mitchell Paige Field *Senior Center class or activity k Community Services Department Attendance Report for September 2012 Summary Sheet Variance Sessions Per Month Program 2012 2011 2012 2011 Leisure Classes 140 152 -12 60 72 Special Events 85 175 -90 2 2 Sports 230 173 57 17 20 Senior Center 493 674 -181 67 72 Total 948 1,174 -226 146 166 Senior Services Senior Center 288 554 -266 14 14 Total 288 554 -266 14 14 Sports User Groups La Quinta Park AYSO 1500 1500 0 11 9 C.V. Barcelona 20 0 20 8 0 Desert Boot Camp 50 50 0 12 10 Sports Complex LQ Youth & Sports Assoc. 200 175 25 15 21 Colonel Mitchell Paige AYSO 250 250 Ol 6 6 C.V. Barcelona 20 20 0 2 9 C.V. Revolution 20 20 0 8 6 Facility/Park Rentals Senior Center (Private Party) 0 200 -200 0 1 (Sunday Church) 375 300 75 5 4 Museum Meeting Room 50 0 50 1 0 Library Classroom 350 350 0 7 7 Civic Center Campus (Private Party) 0 50 -50 0 1 Park Rentals La Quinta Park 150 1001 50 3 2 Fritz Burns Park 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2,985 3,015 -30 78 76 Total Programs 1 4,221 4,743 -522 238 256 Volunteer Hours Senior Center 1 1311 356 -225 Total Volunteer Hours 1 131 356 -225 %. 304 Community Services Department Program Report for September 2012 2012 2011 2012 2011 Participants Participants Variance Meetings Meetings Leisure Classes Microsoft Excel 5 0 5 1 0 Zumba 18 15 3 8 9 Yoga - Morning 5 3 2 4 4 Yoga - Evening 6 7 -1 4 5 Meditation 3 0 3 4 0 Ballet/Tap 4-6 7 7 0 3 4 MS Outlook 5 01 5 3 0 Karate/Taekwondo 4 - 8 (Beg.) 15 20 -5 7 7 Karate/Taekwondo 4- 8 (Inter.) 40 36 4 7 7 Karate/Taekwondo 9 & up 28 15 13 7 7 Dance, Play & Pretend 4 8 -41 41 4 Jazzercise 4 12 -81 81 9 Totals 1401 123 171 601 56 2012 2011 2012 2011 Participants Participants Variance Meetings I Meetings Special Events Fitness Center Anniversary Event 50 0 50 1 0 9/11 Tribute 35 0 35 1 0 Totals 85 0 85 2 0 2012 2011 2012 2011 Participants Participants Variance Meetings I Meetings Sports Open Gym Basketball 94 59 35 11 12 Open Gym Volleyball 92 43 49 4 5 Nature Walk 9 15 -6 1 1 Y-Rookies (youth soccer program) 35 50 -15 1 1 Totals 1 230 167 631 17 19 [Community Services Totals 1 4551 2901 1651 791 75 IV 3 C 5 Community Services Department Monthly Revenue Report for September 2012 Monthly Revenue - Facility Rentals 2012 2011 Variance Library $ 50.00 $ $ 50.00 Museum $ 150.00 $ - $ 150.00 Senior Center $ 1,237.50 $ 2,075.00 $ (837.50) Parks $ 215.00 $ 320.00 $ (105.00) Sports Fields $ 1,104.00 $ 1,399.00 $ (295.00) Monthly Facility Revenue $ 2,756.50 $ 3,794.00 $ (1,037.50) Monthly Revenue Senior Center $ 2,746.50 1 $ 4,272.00 $ (1,525.50) Community Services $ 5,839.00 $ 6,902.00 $ (1,063.00) La Quinta Resident Cards $ 5,400.00 $ 3,780.00 $ 1,620.00 Total Revenue $ 13,985.50 1 $ 14,954.00 $ (968.50) Revenue Year to Date Facility Revenue $ 5,296.50 $ 7,071.00 $ (1,774.50) Senior Center $ 5,074.50 $ 8,481.50 $ (3,407.00) Community Services $ 16,220.00 $ 16,312.50 $ (92.50) La Quinta Resident Cards $ 14,280.00 $ 9,170.00 $ 5,110.00 Total Revenue to Date $ 40,871.00 $ 41,035.00 $ (164.00) ir 3 0 Senior Center Attendance Senior Center Program Report for September 2012 Participation Participation Variance Meetings Meetings 2012 2011 2012 2011 Senior Activities Bridge, Social/Party 183 253 -70 13 14 Monthly Birthday Party 35 45 -10 1 1 Monthly Luncheon (Cruise Cuisinel) 69 84 -15 1 1 Movie Time 28 55 -27 4 5 Putting Action & Wii Bowling 40 5 35 8 4 Senior Activity Total 355 442 -87 27 25 Senior Leisure Classes Exercise 28 49 -21 11 11 Mah Jongg 28 0 28 5 0 Mat Pilates 8 15 -7 11 11 Quitters 31 25 6 4 4 Swing/Latin Fusion 7 5 2 4 4 Ukulele Players 36 24 12 5 5 Senior Leisure Classes Total 138 118 20 40 35 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 493 560 -67 67 60 Senior Services Cool Center 33 119 -86 14 20 FIND 185 260 -75 5 5 LIHEAP 11 11 0 1 1 HICAP/Notary/Legal/Financial/Lobby/Health Screening 32 26 6 8 6 Volunteers 27 29 -2 n/a n/a TOTAL SENIOR SERVICES 288 445 -71 14 12 SENIOR CENTER TOTAL 781 1005 -138 81 72 "' 397 Parks Activities Updates For September 2012 The dog drinking fountain that was purchased for Pioneer Dog Park by Phyllis Lewis through the Adopt -A -Park Program has been installed. The replacement of all of the sports field lights including the tennis courts at Fritz Burns Park has been complete. The youth sports associations will begin their Fall programs during the month of September. The numerous trees and branches that were damaged during the September 9, 2012 wind storm continue to be removed. The landscape contractors have been busy citywide addressing safety and access issues first. The clean-up is expected to continue for a week and an inventory is being made of the trees that will need to be replaced. There has been an increase in thefts of backflow preventers throughout the Coachella Valley. In September, thieves stole the water backflows from Monticello Park and La Quinta Park. CVWD is the owner of the devices and has replaced the backflows at each facility. The thieves also damaged the irrigation and landscape during the thefts and the cost to the City was approximately $400 at each site. A few residents from the La Quinta Cove have inquired about the creation of a community garden. Staff has been researching the idea and has been in communication with the Cities of Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and Indio regarding their community garden programs. Staff will be working with residents of the Cove to create a community garden program and the additional costs that would be associated with the administration and maintenance. New shade covers have been installed at the rest stations along the Bear Creek Trail. A shade cover at Adams Park and a shade cover at Fritz Burns Park have been vandalized. Replacement covers were ordered. La Quints Community Fitness Center Counts for September 2012 Day Memberships Sold Rubys Sold Sapphires Sold Diamonds Sold Walk-ins Sold Daily Counts Daily Totals 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 18 1 2 191 212 5 11 4 188 203 6 10 2 4 175 191 7 1 0 146 147 8 4 1 62 67 9 0 10 8 0 192 200 11 9 1 191 201 12 4 1 185 190 13 3 1 2 173 178 14 5 1 175 181 15 4 1 82 87 16 0 17 12 205 217 18 7 177 184 19 8 2 186 196 20 1 169 170 21 10 1 160 171 22 2 1 2 68 72 23 0 24 7 1 2 1 203 213 25 12 2 198 212 26 5 198 203 27 10 1 2 183 196 28 3 1 157 161 29 4 1 68 73 30 0 31 0 AVG 7.136363636 1.285714286 0 0 1 M824 162.2608696 156.5 TTL 157 9 0 0 27 3732 - 3925 The Gems symbolize the Wellness System Fees Ruby Level = $50.00 Self -Directed Program; One Year -Key Use Sapphire Level = $175.00 All Ruby Level Benefits; Pre -Fitness Assessment Test; Custom Designed Program by Personal Training Staff; Post -Fitness Assessment Test Diamond Level = $295.00 All Ruby and Sapphire Level Benefits; Three Additional Personal Training Sessions • Members Sold is the # of memberships sold that day. • Walk-ins arepeople without membership cards that are paying a daily $5 fee. • Daily counts are the # of Members coming into the center that have had their membership cards scanned by us. • The totals at the end of each row is the total of all of the above transactions for the day. 3�q CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY SERVICES MARKETING PLAN 2012/2013 OUR MISSION "We facilitate active lifestyles through quality recreational and park opportunities." This marks the sixth year the Community Services Department has implemented a comprehensive marketing plan in collaboration with the City Marketing Plan to promote active lifestyles through quality recreational and cultural opportunities. The Community Services Marketing Plan contains a complete listing of print, web, and other media used to promote activities, as well as specific objectives and the marketing efforts this Department plans to undertake during Fiscal Year 2012/2013. The plan sets out to accomplish a direct and indirect communication with residents; keep them informed of important City news and programs; and promote activities and special events, which enhances the quality of life in La Quinta. DELIVERY SYSTEMS Currently the Community Services Department uses the following advertising delivery systems: PRINT MEDIA The Gem. A monthly publication from the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce featuring the "La Quinta City Scene," including news and information directly from the City. • Circulated to all households via United States Postal Service. • Self -serve racks placed in community buildings and other areas. • A publication of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce - www.lgchamber.com. La Quinta/Indio Sun. A weekly, full -color newspaper is a product of the Desert Sun and focuses on the cities of La Quinta and Indio. • Circulated to all households via delivery drivers. • Self -serve racks placed in community buildings and other areas. o A publication of The Desert Sun - www.mydesert.com/laquinta. La Quinta City Report. An annual publication with news and information on exciting City projects, events, and programs. • Circulated to all households via United States Postal Service. • Self -serve racks placed in community buildings. • A publication of the City - www.la-guinta.org 4 311 La Quinta Activities Guide.' A bi-annual publication containing information on classes, programs, events, excursions, facilities, parks, golf, and other City interests. e Self -serve racks placed in community buildings. • Available online and emailed to user list. • A publication of the City - www.la-guinta.org. LQ Active Newsletter. A monthly newsletter produced by the Senior Center that has information on free seminars, classes, special events, movie times, and listing of all the dates and times for classes beginning that month. • Self -serve racks at La Quinta Senior Center. • Available online and emailed to user list. e A publication of the City - www.la-guinta.org. Maps. The City offers four stylized, full color maps. Maps are available for free at City Hall or downloadable on the City's website. • Bicycle map outlining the approved bike routes along City streets. Includes a list of rest stops with shade, benches, and drinking fountains. • Art in Public Places map outlining locations throughout the City of Art in Public Places pieces. • Trails map for the Top of the Cove was developed to show trail directions and information about desert hiking. • Park Map that shows the parks, open space areas and trails within the City. • Historic Place's in La Quinta map shows places of historical interest. • Publications of the City of La Quinta - www.la-guinta.org. Seasonal Ads. The City runs print ads in the Desert Sun, La Quinta Sun, and Desert Entertainer in different seasons to promote multiple programs including City events, Library events, Museum events, Old Town events, Senior Center events, and more. Light Pole Banners. The City uses a series of light pole banners to promote the healthy and cultural lifestyle of La Quinta. • Over 80 banner locations. • Light poles with banners have been installed at Fritz Burns Park, La Quinta Park, and Adams Park for additional promotions. • A publication of the City - www.la-guinta.org. Promotional Items. The City is very active in marketing programs and utilizes promotional items to spread the word. The Department's focus remained on Fitness and Wellness programming, so the promotional items were selected to promote "Healthy Eating Active Living (HEAL) and the Parks Make Life Better (PMLB) themes." Items like: Walking Log Books, Pencils, and Bookmarks are given away. • Over 8,000 giveaway items. • Items imprinted with HEAL & PMLB themes. ' 312 • A product of the City - www.la-quinta.or Flyers. The City has created templates for creating flyers. Templates are very colorful with hues of Green, Blue, Tan, and Orange. Each template includes the Gem Logo, a photo, and all pertinent information about the activity. • Self -serve racks placed in community buildings. e A publication of the City - www.la-guinta.org. Rack Cards. These cards are used primarily for the Museum and Library to promote exhibits and upcoming events. Rack cards can also be used by the Community Services Department to promote City events and programs. • Self -serve racks placed in community buildings. o A publication of the City & Museum - www.la-guinta.org. P►9:I:7LI:107I_t City Website. The City website was re -designed in 2006 to showcase the services in La Quinta. The Community Services Department page has all of its activities listed with a direct web registration link. Links to Programs, Facilities, Parks, Golf, Events, Excursions, Library, Museum, and Senior Center provide users with the right information in just a few clicks. Users have the ability to view the City's parks, add comments and ratings for each one, as well as download important documents, flyers, and pictures from the City. • www.la-guinta.org PlayinLaQuinta.com - The City's tourism website promotes Shopping, Dining, Staying, and Playing in La Quinta. The website hosts links to multiple hotels, restaurants, shopping centers and events. • www.playiniaguinta.com Facebook. This social networking membership website connects the City directly with other members who include citizens, businesses, and other agencies. This site allows the City to post event listings, event photo albums, discussion items; status updates, and program reminders and updates. • www.facebook.com Survey Monkey. This survey based website allows the Department to create surveys for general information or very specific programs. The users follow a link posted on the Department webpage and can simply point -and -click the survey answers, then submit them to us electronically. e www.surveymonkey.com La Quinta Phone Application "app." A Smartphone application that maps out the City and locates nearby restaurants, parks, golf course, shopping locations, and promotes upcoming events. io 313 "Quail Mail." This feature of the City's website allows users to subscribe to the calendar and news listings. Once subscribed, users will receive email updates from the City when new calendar and news items are posted. • www.la-guinta.org MyDesert.com. The City has its own page on The Desert Sun's website. Users can leave comments, pictures, videos, blogs and other creative ways to communicate with each other. • www.mydesert.com/laquinta LaQuintaCove.org. This website is maintained by the La Quinta Cove Association, a neighborhood group that advocates for the largest neighborhood in the City. Users can post news articles, promote events and other programs, post pictures and video, and blog about happenings in the community. • www.laquintacove.org KaBoom.org. This website is a listing and map of playgrounds and other open -space and play spaces around the country. All of La Quinta's parks are listed on KaBoom. The site features amenities listings, photos, map, and user comments and reviews of each play space. • www.kaboom.org MapMyWalk.com. This website is a free user -defined route planner for walking and fitness. The site offers a build -your -own walking map which provides accurate distance for your walk. It also links with the MapMyFitness website which tracks your fitness progress, logs your food intake, and includes social networking functions. There are several user - defined routes in La Quinta including: Bear Creek Trail, Civic Center Campus, and La Quinta Park that were defined by City staff. • www.mapmywalk.com Email blasts. The Community Services Department maintains a large email database and sends out an email blast monthly to promote upcoming events and programs. For a more targeted marketing approach, the City collaborates with many non-profit service providers and their email databases to promote activities. • Non -Profit Service Providers include: La Quinta Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, La Quinta Arts Foundation, La Quinta Historical Society, YMCA of the Desert, La Quinta Cove Association, Friends of the Library, and Desert Recreation District AGENCY PARTNERSHIPS The Community Services Department works with non -profits and local businesses to share in the costs of event supplies, staffing, production, and marketing. Examples of this include: • Easter Egg Hunt — Windermere Real Estate. '° 314 • Community Picnic and Birthday Party - Numerous Non -Profits and local business support. • Distinguished Artists - La Quinta Arts Foundation and Library. • Tails on Trails and Nature Walks - Stewards of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve. • Humana Challenge Month - Humana and Desert Recreation District • 4" of July - Chamber of Commerce, Desert Recreation District, and other businesses. WORD OF MOUTH Speak to past program users at event booths, during activities, and at customer service desks to identify new ways to effectively promote within targeted markets. OBJECTIVES BY DIVISION RECREATION PROGRAMS I SPECIAL EVENTS I EXCURSIONS OBJECTIVE: To provide adult and youth programs, sports programs, and family oriented activities, organize seasonal and holiday events; and develop sports, social, and cultural excursions. • Continue to seek new partnerships for promotion and collaboration of health and fitness opportunities. These shall align with the Healthy Eating Active Living and Parks Make Life Better planned activities such as Humana Challenge Month in cooperation with the Desert Recreation District. o Humana Challenge ■ Continue to improve the partnership with Humana by aligning their brand with existing regional events for sponsorship opportunities. ■ Continue to increase participation and attendance at the Well - Being Walk and Healthy Fun Fair by promoting these events through the established and new delivery systems. o La Quinta Community Fitness Center (Desert Recreation District) ■ Continue to promote health and wellness programs being offered at this location. Some examples include: Full page in Activities Guide, Article in each monthly e-blast, and GEM. 0 4" of July Parade & Fireworks (Chamber of Commerce) ■ Continue to work with the Chamber of Commerce to promote this event regionally through print and web media. • Continue providing information by updating and adding new content to our delivery systems regularly, highlighting new classes and programs, and include facility locations, maps and other information needed for increased user participation. • Continue to expand and increase classes and programs through the established delivery systems. In 2011/2012 the department interacted with over 19,000 participants (a 19% decrease overall from last year's 23,500). This decrease is due to the over 7,000 fitness center users that were not included in the report this year. The department saw increases in other areas 315 such as a 33% in class attendance from 1,500 enrollments to 2,000 and a 27% increase in special events attendance from 8,900 to 11,200 in 2012. • Encourage contract instructors to actively promote their classes to increase user participation and increase revenue. • Identify more effective ways of gathering program evaluations, surveys, and user feedback for evening clasees. e Continue to send out monthly e-mail blast newsletter to all households in the RecTrac/WebTrac database. • Continue to place special/sports event banners at select park locations to promote certain events such as Holiday Events, Y-Triathlon, Community Picnic, and Birthday Party. • Increase Summer Golf Tour participation by mailing out flyers to past participants. Staff also distributed flyers at Lumpy's, Big 5, and Beer Hunter. • Promote new Outdoor Recreation programs including the popular Nature Walks provided by the Stewards of the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve, New guided destination hikes led by Philip Ferranti, Volunteers from Friends of the Desert Mountains, and Cove Neighborhood Association, and the new TREKKERS program offered by Desert Recreation District. • Promote new sports programs including Y-Rookies programs, Y-Triathlon, Desert Youth Olympics, and Disc Golf tournaments. Staff is currently working with the Family YMCA of the Desert and Helix Disc Golf to coordinate new leagues and tournaments in the desert hosted by the City. Promotions for these include flyers and numerous online delivery methods. ILY-11S OBJECTIVE. To provide quality park facilities for exercise and fitness, picnicking, athletics, recreational play, canine interaction and other recreational opportunities for the residents of La Quinta. • Promote the new Adopt -A -Park program using the approved delivery systems. e Maintain the Facilities and Rentals sub -section on the City website to include a listing of all the parks, photos, their amenities, and provide information on- line to check facility availability for rentals. • Continue to use the Kaboom website to review, rate and comment on City parks. Submitted comment and rating information can be used to align park maintenance with objectives listed in the Community Services Master Plan. • Distribute Facility Rental brochures to local non-profit agencies and schools for use of the parks. • Continue to provide the Fred Wolff Nature Preserve brochure to the Stewards group and other local enthusiasts. e Direct online users to the downloadable parks map identifying the City park locations and amenities. • Identify new opportunities to promote City parks using the department's extensive delivery systems. 310 FACILITY RENTALS OBJECTIVE: To provide organizations, groups, and agencies with suitable facilities and amenities to be used for meetings, special events, and private celebrations by contracting use and collecting established fees. e The Facilities and Rentals sub -section on the City website has been updated to include a listing of all facilities and parks, photos, their amenities, and provide information on-line to check facility availability. • Continue to market facility rentals by advertising in print media such as The GEM, the La Quinta Sun, and the La Quints Activities Guide; also market via web media such as City website, La Quinta Cove website, and monthly department email blasts. e Distribute the facility rental brochure at City facilities. SENIOR CENTER OBJECTIVE: To provide services to the City's senior residents such as leisure enrichment classes, special events, and activities, facilitate low to no cost informational clinics and other support services. • Continue to provide information on the City website by updating and adding new content regularly, highlighting new classes, programs and special events and provide important social service information. Educate seniors about the website and provide instruction needed for increased online enrollment. e Increase attendance in classes and programs through the established delivery systems (2011/2012 had an annual participation of approximately 12,500 while 2010/2011 had over 16,000 annual enrollments, a decrease of nearly 22%). • Continue to encourage contract instructors to actively promote their classes/programs to increase participation and revenue. • Continue to actively distribute marketing materials through the department's delivery systems to include the Senior Center newsletter (LQ Active), press releases, activity guides, media articles, websites, etc. • Post mail and email the LQ Active newsletter out to various agencies, media outlets, and senior participants which can also be accessed on the City website. • Identify new programming opportunities for "Baby Boomers" through City partners, surveys, and user feedback. e Coordinate with City partners and other valley Senior Centers to promote activities and programs through word of mouth and targeted marketing mailing lists. 4P 311 MUSEUM OBJECTIVE: To preserve and interpret history and culture in the interest of providing the community with cultural and educational programs, including exhibits, events, lectures, and performances. • Expand programming and events at the Museum to encourage attendance. Current programs include a reading program, First Friday entertainment, lectures, and presentations in conjunction with the exhibits. • Continue to actively distribute marketing materials through the department's delivery systems, including print media, radio, television, mailing lists, rack cards and promotional materials. The Museum will promote activities through the La Quinta Historical Society newsletter, Friends of the Library newsletter, La Quinta Arts Foundation, Cove Neighborhood Association, Chamber of Commerce, Library, Community Services e-mail blast, and other local museums. • Promote the exhibits with the La Quinta Arts Foundation and the La Quinta Historical Society utilizing the established delivery systems and their databases. • Continue to coordinate with Desert Sands Unified School District to promote and educate school children about the resources available to them at the Museum. • Participate in the City's Birthday Celebration in the park. LIBRARY OBJECTIVE: To promote community and culture through educational programs, reading programs, events, lectures, and performances. • Participate in the City's Birthday Celebration in the park. • Continue to host Dia de los Ninos & Dia los Libros/Day of the Child & Day of the Book family -focused event at the Library. • Continue to advertise the Evening with Friends Program offered seasonally. • Promote library events using the department's delivery system and promoting through the County events web based calendar. • Encourage teachers to schedule a class visit for their students at the Library. e Instruct teachers at elementary schools on many ways the library databases can be used in the classroom. e Maintain summer activities for children that encourage library use and reading during the summer months. o Coordinate with Outreach Coordinator to promote new programs, book clubs, and other activities hosted at the library. % 31.8 Community Services Update https://ru.consuuitcontactcordvisualeditor/visual_ editor_preview.j sp?age... From: La Quinta Community Services <communityservices@la-quinta.org> Subject: Community Services Update Reply: communityservices@la-quinta.org Having trouble viewing this email? Click here �Mu�] `u Hot in August! The summer heat is here and the great outdoors are hot -hot -hot! We have a few ideas on how to keep cool this month. Take a swim at Fritz Burns Pool, View the exhibits at the La Quinta Museum, or take a class in the air-conditioned Senior Center or Library. Fritz Burns Pool Now Open Y YJ 4,', 4 The La Quints Pool at Fritz Bums Park offers a variety of classes, programs, and special events for children and adults of all ages. • New Online Registration at www ymcaofthedesert.ora In This Edition Fritz Burns Pool Summer Golf Tour Senior Center Happenings Like us on Facebookg, View our videos on YouG La Quinta Museum 77-885 Avenida Montezuma (760) 777-7170 Ladies of Lincoln's Era Through September 8 Ladies of Lincoln's Era features biographies and photographs of 13 courageous women of the 1860s including 2 spies Rose Greehow and Sarah Emma Edmonds, Mary Todd Lincoln and her personal seamstress Elizabeth Keckley, Harriet Tubman and Sojourner Truth both bom into slavery, women like Clara Barton who were part of the medical profession and more. Try your hand at rolling a bandage, see a lock of Mary Tood Lincoln's hair and find out what a passementerie is. California Pioneers 1 of 5 , Ir.. 3 .L y 8/30/2012 8:28 AM Cormmuity Services Update Imps://W.constvkcontactcom/visualeditor/visual editor previewjsp?age... • New Concessions - a selection of food and beverage Through December 2012 items will now be available for sale at the pool office counter Come and experience pioneer • Be a Lifeguard Day - August 18 - 10am-1 pm life in early California through Admission: $2 (12 & under) $3 (13 & older) artifacts, dioramas, and hands • How are we doing? Please take a moment and on activities! Imagine the complete this survey for us, we really want to know journey westward by viewing a what you think about our programs, hours, and anything twenty-five foot covered wagon else you want to tell us. Survey scene and enjoy teaming Morse code by sending messages to For more into on summer aquatic programs, please call the friends via the working Family YMCA of the Desert at (760) 341-9622 or visit our telegraph system -housed in a webske. mock telegraph office and railroad depot! Guests will be able to view various Civil War artifacts, courtesy of the Lincoln All -In -One WeddingPackage 9 Memorial Shrine, includingthe following kerns: a sword, Civic Center Gazebo / Reception Room Special musket, and a hand signed document by Abraham Lincoln. u_ jr YL La Quanta Library 78-275 Calle Tampico (760)564-4767 The Whodunnit? Mystery Book Club Wednesday, August 15 FREE 10:30am % Family Movie Time ` r Sunday, August 12 FREE µ,is" 1-4pm We now offer the perfect bundle for your upcoming special day - the Civic Center Gazebo / Reception Room wedding package! Reserve both locations and take advantage of our Did you know... special rental discounts. Call the Community Services You can use WebTrac to Department at (760) 777-7090 for rates and availability. register for most programs, classes and excursions that Event Site Amenities the Community Services Beautiful Outdoor Island Gazebo Department offers. WebTrac Spacious Reception Hall is available 24 hours a day / Elevated Stage Area 7 days a week. Large Dance Floor Tables and Chairs Included (in Reception Hall) Register Early... Kitchen available (for nominal fee) Programs often cancel because the minimum - ---- -- ---- -- ------------- - -- - - I enrollment requirements $1 00 Wedding Package Special were not mat. Waiting until the last minute to register is OFF Rent the Civic Center Gazebo and , usually too late, so please Reception Room at the Senior Center as register early. a bundle and receive $100 off total cost! (Minimum 2 hour Gazebo rental and 6 hour Senior Center , Having an event? i We have facilities and parks 2 of 5 320 8/30/2012 8:28 AM Community Services Update https://W.consamtcontact.com/visua!editor/visual editor previewjsp?age... , available for private rentals. rental required. Limit one coupon perrentaI.) Meeting spaces include the La Quints and La LiMuseum Quints Library. For larger Q � social events and parties the La Quints Senior Center, r ----------------------I Civic Center Campus, La , 20% Summer Event Special Quints Park and Fritz Burns Book the Senior Center Multipurpose Room OFF Park are available. Please 777-7090 for for any private party and receive 20% off of call (760) more total hourly room rental fees! information. A savings of up to $200 for an 8 hour rentall (Eeentmusttake place between July l-August 31, 2012. , No minimum hours required. Limit one coupon per rental.) , , 2012 Summer Golf Tour :r w,y. „$ DROP -INS WELCOME! This program allows participants to play at some of the finest courses in the Coachella Valley. Course favorites such as Escena Golf Club, Eagle Falls, Indian Wells Golf Resort, and Classic Club are part of the tour this year. Tour participants may pick and choose which courses they would like to play. Players may choose to play in either single or team divisions; plaques will be awarded to the top finalists in both divisions at the Golf Tour Banquet on August 25. 'Guests are welcome to participate for a fee of $15 per week. July Courses - Register todayl Date Course Shotgun Time Green Fee 8/4 Desert Willow 7:30am $40 3%1 3 of 5 8/30/2012 8:28 AM Community Services Update https://ui.constantcontactcon✓vistialeditor/visual editor_preview.j sp?age... 8/11 Eagle Falls lam $50 8/18 Classic Club 7:30am $50 8/25 IWCC Cove 7:30am $50 End of Tour Banquet FREE for members $25 for guests a J♦y � _ � V s V �i ..'114 I' a La Quinta Park Party Roservo is 4uinta Park or Frih Burns Park W your birthday party and receive S IO tiff a second reservation. CoB us at t7601777-7090 for rotes and rosarvrvaytioonns-. �- is MD Senior Center Happenings... t>. fir � •�j �� l n,+r air � r� b _ r LQ Active Newsletter Do you want to know about what is happening at the La Quinta 4of5 3 •_ `8/30/2012 8:28 AM Comnumity Services Update baps: //ui.consta=ontact.com/visualeditor/vi sual_editor_preview.j sp?age... Senior Center? Take a look at the LQ Active newsletter. Download La Quints Community Services Department 78-495 Calls Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7090 1 communkyservicesCalla-auirda.oro www.la-auinta.or9/communityservices iy T ted E.;,I from l F-i*S9hVMubsatbe' f CorutmttCGnto[t' rty h FREE today This email was sent to communityservices@la-quinta.org by communitvservices(ala-auinta.om I Update Profile/Email Address I Instant removal with SafeUnsubscri rm 1 Privacy Policy. City of La Quinta, Community Services Department 1 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta I CA 192253 .% 3?3 5 of 5 8/30/2012 8:28 AM N; §§ o Qƒ &%# [;®% !& 3 E `xI L6 ,f Ao < k I , ~ 2w L70rudgil m = w u E )E E mcm 'f!§!!!5))a \ r��,e#e,e {t \ E, \\ I S24 e `o I m � m e u E m C Cd '> (0 _ iL t C J � F I RAL- } i L a I m IF t u o E LE d 6 y h S In r IL d� p 2 m v� C c J c N� , l7t p ry C LL K m L C FNF11 3 � The Community Services Department along with instructor Elise Goldner offers Yoga classes. Yoga tones and creates a flexible, strong body. It improves energy, vitality, maintains metabolism, and promotes good cardio health. Yoga also helps to relax and de -stress while teaching focus and encouraging positive thoughts. Register at www.la-quinta.org/register. MORNING SESSION EVENING SESSION Ages: 18 years 8? up Ages: 18 years 8? up Day: Tuesdays Day: Thursdays Time: 8 - 9 am Time: 6 - 7 pm Bring: Yoga Mat, water Bring: Yoga Mat, water Location: La Quinta Senior Center Location: La Quinta Library 78-450 Avenida La Fonda 78-275 Calle Tampico For more information please visit www.la-quinta.org or call us at (760) 777-7090. t. HEALTHY EATING ACTIVE LIVING CITIES CAMPAIGN 3?s The La Quinta Summer Golf Tour is back. This 13-week golf program allows participants to play at some of the finest courses in the Coachella Valley. Course favorites such as Escena Golf Club, Eagle Falls, Indian Wells Golf Resort, and Classic Club are part of the tour this year. Tour participants may pick and choose which courses they would like to play. Players may choose to play in either single or team divisions; plaques will be awarded to the top finalists in both divisions at the Golf Tour Banquet on August 25. *Guests are welcome to participate for a fee of $15 per week. Registration begins on Monday, May 71 DATE June 2 June 9 June 16 June 23 June 30 July 7 July 14 July 21 July 28 August 4 August 11 August 18 August 25 August 25 Terra lago, South Course STARTING TIME 7:30 AM Shotgun Escena Golf Club 7:30 AM Shotgun Mission Hills Country Club, A. Palmer Course 8:00 AM Shotgun Tahquitz Creek, Resort Course Heritage Palms Indian Wells Golf Resort, Celebrity Course Westin Mission Hills, Gary Player Course SilverRock Resort Desert falls Country Club Desert Willow, Fire Cliff Course Eagle Falls Golf Course Classic Club at Palm Desert Indian Wells Country Club, Cove Course End -Of -Tour Banquet — Indian Wells Country Club 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:00 AM Shotgun 7:00 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:00 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 7:30 AM Shotgun 12:00 PM GREEN IF=** $40.00 $50.00(includes lunch) $50.00 $35.00 $30.00 $50.00 $35.00 $40.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Free for members ($25 for guests) ** Weekly course green fees extra. For more information please visit www.la-quinta.org or call us at (760) 777-7090. 3?7 vities Guide Fa112012/WIn4r2012 Paeft q@UVO up 9@d(@V4 Pick up locations listed on the back The NEW Activities Guide is available for WE up at the following locations: W Quinla Civic Center La Quinta Senior Canter 78495 Celle Tamp eo 78450 Avenida La Fonda La Quinla Library La Quinla Museum 78475 Celle Tampico 77885 Avenida Montezuma Silv¢rRode Resort La Quinla Community Fitness Cantor 79179 Ahmanson Lane 77865 Avenida Montezuma President Gerald R. Ford RoFs b Girls Club of la Quinta 49995 Pa Avenue Get your digital copy @ W la-quinta.org/eommunihs¢rviees lllllllllllllllllorjscanjth-ejUR code below. Imi Tustin Larson From: lexi@fgcreative.com Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:48 PM To: Tustin Larson Subject: [FWD: City of La Quints August 2012 Calendar Events] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: City of La Quinta August 2012 Calendar Events From: FG Creative <andrea@fgcreative.com> Date: Fri, August 31, 2012 11:30 am To: lexi@fqcreative.com CITY OF l.A QutNTA (760) 777-7035 • WWv FOR SEPTEMBER CALENDARS CITY OF LA QUINTA SEPTEMBER 2012 EVENTS Events that are new for September are noted with "*". Past events continuing into September are listed as well. Recreation Open Gym Basketball 7:00-9:00pm Tuesdays & Wednesdays President Gerald R. Ford Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta FREE - Mandatory sign -in 330 Shoot baskets or play full or half -court games at the La Quinta Boys & Girls Club. Youth and adults can drop -in for a workout or play just for fun! Participants 13 and under must be supervised by an adult at all times. Open Gym Indoor Volleyball 7:00-9:00pm Thursdays President Gerald R. Ford Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta FREE - Mandatory sign -in Join us for some pick-up Indoor Volleyball. It's FREE to play all you have to do is sign -in when you arrive. Participants 13 and under must be supervised by an adult at all times. La Ouinta Library For more information about all library programs, please call 760-564-4767. *Pre -Beginning Computer Class Thursdays, September 13, 20, 27 10:00 - 11:00am Join us for an interactive series that will teach you the basics of the computer. No previous computer experience required. Registration on the first day of class (only 12 spaces available). *Conversational Spanish Class Wednesdays, September 26 - November 14 5:30 - 7:00pm Experience new techniques and methods to help you learn easier and retain longer through our very own method of learning the language and culture. Regardless of your level of Spanish the course will be customized to your personal or business needs. Registration required. *On -the -Lap Storytime Tuesday, September 25 10:00 - 10:30am This program is for babies and very young children who are just learning to listen to stories and songs. 331 *Preschool Storytime Tuesday, September 25 11:00 - 11:45am This program is for children ages 3 and up who can sit independently, listen to stories and follow our leader Ms Beth. The Whodunnit? Mystery Book Club Wednesday, September 19 10:30am La Quinta Library FREE Mystery lovers gather to discuss a month's titles. Books are available in advance at the library Reference Desk. For more information call (760) 564-4767. Family Movie Time Sunday, September 9 1:00-4:00pm La Quinta Library FREE Join us every 2nd Sunday of each month for a Movie and FREE popcorn for the whole family. La Ouinta Museum *"Creativity in La Quinta Cove" exhibit opens September 22 - December 22, 2012 Tuesday - Saturday from 10:00am-4:00pm La Quinta Museum FREE The exhibit features artists, hobbyists and craftspeople who make their home in the neighborhood surrounding the Museum. The thirty-four exhibitors include painters, photographers, jewelers, and clay artists as well as a wood turner, set designer, quilter, and furniture maker. Come see the creative imagination that abounds in the Museum's backyard. Opening reception with the artists will be Friday, September 21 from 5 to 7pm. 332 Preschool Story Time at La Quinta Museum First Wednesday of each month - September 5 10:00am La Quinta Museum FREE Special story time for children ages 3 - 5 followed by a fun craft! For more information call (760) 777- 7170. Forward email GI',� i rruYJ Email hom � �{/i�CidYtSUI�4r�Q j COrnalarltCOntact r,y R FREE today. This email was sent to IexiCalfocreative.com by andrea(dUcicreative.com I Update Profile/Email Address I Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe'" I Privacy Policy. FG Creative, Inc. 1 74-020 Alessandro Dr., Suite E I Palm Desert I CA 192260 333 PROGRAMS Fiscal Year 3011r2012 TOTALS June-12 Ma -03 April-03 Mar-12 Feb-12 Jan-12 Dee-11 Nov-11 Oct -II 11 Au -11 Ju -11 Leisure Classes `; .:.11 965 117 200 208 175 167 161 130 186 201 152 126 142 Special Events -.:;11285 80 58 3,800 70 60 4055 11180 475 650 175 250 432 Adults orts/O n G ::':: 55 810 418 720 588 826 658 400 264 280 238 173 564 681 Senior Center --12189 510 893 1335 1089 1,388 1,283 1,058 1,140 1356 674 755 708 TOTAL 31 1,125 1 871 5 931 2 160 2 273 3,899 2 632 2 081 244S 1 174 1 695 1 963 La Quints Park Use AYSO 1 8 80 100 1 200 1 300 1 400 1 500 1 700 1 1,400 1 1.500 1 1500 1 1.500 1 180 C.V. Soccer Club C.V. Revolution Desert Boot Camp 500 50 1 50 1 50 50 1 50 50 50 50 50 50 LQ Rub Club -e�150 30 30 30 30 30 LQ Sports 5 Youth -700 1 100 1 150 150 1 1501 150 Col. Paine School AYSO :. 750 250 2501 250 LQ Rugby Club 150 30 30 301 30 30 LQ Futbol ;'• 160 20 20 20 20 40 1 40 Y Football Lea ue Practices 1 90 30 30 30 CV Revolution 1 185 25 20 20 20 20 20 20 201 20 Fritz Burns Park AYSO Sports Complex LQ S orts & Youth ,i4 700 300 800 850 850 850 175 175 175 175 175 75 100 LQ Insani a's.'>25 1 1 1 1 25 So Cal Xtreme LQ/PD Youth Football 1 330 50 1 140 J 140 FACILITY/PARK RENTALS Senior Center La Quints Park r3450 200 200 250 250 300 501 1001 1 600 100 100 100 200 Fritz Bums Park .> 300 50 100 50 100 Fritz Bums Park Tennis Courts Cove Oasis Trailhead Civic Center Campus ".28070 1 150 1 600 25,020 1 1001 2,150 150 Senior Carter Proomms Senior Activities 9,0671 574 1 581 1 991 1 741 1 1003 1 871 1 7371 845 1 1,032 1 5691 574 549 Senior Leisure Classes - >' 3,3671 181 1 312 1 344 1 348 1 385 1 412 1 321 1 295 1 324 1 105 1 181 159 TOTAL : 1 755 893 1335 1989 1388 1233 1058 1140 1358 874 755 708 Senior Senior Services 1 4.0991 374 1 255 1 291 1 316 352 2931 264 266 331 1 554 1 374 429 Volunteer Hours I'-r2521 1 79 1 178 1 293 1 222 1 277 1 139 1 162 1 131 1 221 1 356 1 121 342 TOTAL I IUD 1 453 1 433 1 584 1 5381 5291 432 1 426 1 397 1 552 1 910 495 771 LQ Fitness Carter DRD 45915 1 4,147 1 4,298 1 3,913 1 4343 14,250 14,348 1 2,868 1 3476 1 4203 1 3808 1 4,117 1 2,144 334 PROGRAMS bal Year 2010=11 bTOTALS June-11 -17 rt1.11 Mar-11 Feb-11 Jan-11 Dec-10 Nov-10 Oct-00 9e 10 Au -00 Ju -10 Leisure Classes "° 1 512: 179 128 178 167 122 107 60 140 167 110 61 93 Special Events '. -i8903 412 345 4,425 40 85 990 200 1 015 267 744 360 Fitness Center i,.^:7 145 461 604 550 756 607 664 458 649 645 658 539 554 AdultSports/Open G m ::-: `: 5,947 681 885 647 712 304 445 339 241 336 249 575 633 Senior Center ;'14,581 767 1,189 1,515 1,409 1,587 1,521 1,078 1,271 1680 1057 770 737 TOTAL 088 2,500 3,151 7,215 3,084 T 820 2,822 2 925 2,601 843 2 361 889 2,377 La Quints Park Use AYSO 1 8270 100=25 600 800 1,300 1,500 1,500 1500 170 C.V. Soccer Club s.;-225 200 C.V. Revolution V.':,:50 25Desert Boot Cam , .>:-'"M 50 50 50 50 50 50 LQ Ru Club : 610025 25 25 25 LQS orts&Youth :': •'850 100 150 jII LQS orts 8 Youth " 3 800 200 700 800 800 800 60 60 60 60 100 60 100 LQ Insani 25 25 So Cal Xtreme LQIPD Youth Football ,300 150 150 FACILITYIPARK RENTALS La Quints Park 2 250 200 350 350 300 100 50 100 200 200 150 50 200 Fritz Bums Park -;:<800 50 200 50 100 50 160 50 106 100 Fritz Bums Park Tennis Courts 1 100 100 Cove Oasis Trailhead I ,,:>--°- Civic Center Campus 1 21,8621 50 1 500 1 20,037 1 50 1 1 1 1,125 50 50 Senior Center Programs Senior Activities 1 10.9041 552 852 1 1,041 1 938 1 1,163 1 1,063 1 847 1 935 1 1354 1 879 1 664 618 Senior Leisure Classes 1'<3677. 2151 1 337 1 4741 4731 4241 4581 231 1 336 1 3261 1781 1061 119 TOTAL 1 1 531 1 7571 1,1591 1,5151 1,409 1 1,537 1 1,521 1 1,073 1 1 T71 I 1 880 1 1,057 1 770 1 737 Senior Center Free Senior Services I_. 38Y2 1 2641 264 1 3181 251 1 337 1 276 1 208 1 211 1 386 1 347 519 441 Volunteer Hours 1 Mull 1 2701 2001 322 1 337 1 3531 2601 3161 2491 2691 1701 162 193 TOTAL 823. 534 454 640 538 590 538 524 450 055 517 881 834 335 DEPARTMENT REPORT: (. `&t�t 4 4aw V y CFM Or TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robbeyn Bird, Finance Director 2$ DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Credit Card Payments At the October 2, 2012 City Council meeting, a request was made by the City Council to consider implementing and accepting credit card payments at the museum. The City currently has the ability to accept credit card payments; however, it has been the City's policy not to accept credit card payments except through online registrations for Community Services classes. Recognizing that in the City of La Quinta, customer service is a high priority with the City Council, the City Manager, and the staff, Finance staff contacted the vendor currently used by the City for debit and credit card transactions to determine the feasibility of implementing the use of credit cards in multiple locations. For Visa, Mastercard and Discover the transaction fee is 1.8% of the purchase price plus 260 per transaction. Based on sales at the museum for the previous fiscal year, the additional cost of proceeding with the implementation of using credit cards at the museum would be less than $100. Staff will be implementing the new process on or before October 19`h 336 Department Report: aY 0 , t YF.Cy, O��ty SOFT TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Johnson, Planning Direct o DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Department Report for the Month of September 2012 Attached please find a copy of the Planning Department Report which outlines the current cases processed by staff for the month of September 2012. 1 H z W m Q a W 0 U Z Z Z Q J a O a w H Z w 2 H Q a w 0 N O N X W m 2 w H a w to LU Z W H O F- a. m � O U m w m W Y a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m Q U a a a) Y Y_ a) Y Y N Y Y_ N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y_ N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y_ O Y 1+ N Y Y a) Y N Y N Y O Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y W S a)O E E E E E E E E E E E E E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E Y E v 0 0 o n a s a s .0 .0 m a a a s w Z ,000ON,OtoMOOOOOW,OOm dON CM G .- Z Q to Z J O N N W h y _rn IL m °' F- rn " >- « aci * c � v Z _m Y N c 0 U C ` N Y a) d N n. O n' E V ui a) a) a) d a c N O. E d rn M O. a7 N Q a O N N� O != a C c O d Y a) N 0 ma Q . E C a� a) m s E a N a 0 Q E m 0 E N U o 0 a) O O c* o c y a c oC N N o c a) `m `M O° °) E N Y a� N f0 0 >, != '= 'E o m E a H > o c 'a c 0 o a aci E a c a `o a� N .co " Co E —y >> N t 0 o t '• Q= t"> °� o Z .Y 'Y m Z U y U 0 0 a s O c Y 0 a a) tr > .� m a) 0 0 v •� c c 0 0 +° :° a� .c o a) 0. c>> C c c c_ 0 0 tm tT 0 Y m c c E — c c a> O. O () O c E 0 O_ y N a) a) 0 0 7 0 Q U W U' d (n fn Cn 0 W F H H> N N I to U 338 N F- O N U ai Q C. z IL O_ m N W �a LU 00 U f- (D N z_ z 0 z N a J 0 00 0 0 rn N z 0 H (L U U) w cl 'O 0 - v v v v v v v N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 y�j Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 CL w 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7>> 7 7 7 O 7 7 7 7 a y y y y y y y m m y y w m m rn y y m a s 004(M.—N004000�•-0�0�•-0 Qa W z F- D 0 0 QU. y F W a 3 C E E p H � ,. C Y C rn W O Vi y C E y E f0 0 E E C a� m a C a a a O y N Q LL a W CM d N N O. N y {' O O a y rna�Q Y m�� °' w aO yQwM m co Ew00u`m y 10 0= w m N O O d H NIM 'ij 0 E � c � a _O E ma co 0) (A mo zQ 0 �� m > 0 z >> L O Q a L m O. C> f0 C V Y L C N y F— H O. O 0 C C y 0 O] Y N O_ Y C di C d: - C 0 C 0 O O QQUOwiiUicc(A(AW0E-F-�NN F-F- (`) 333 Department Report: -75 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Deborah Powell, Economic Develo nt/Housing Manager Les Johnson, Planning Director/%. DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Status Report - Permitting Process The City's 2012/2013 Economic Development Plan, Action Item No. 8, focuses upon reviewing the current permitting process in an effort to ensure that it is as "efficient and effective as possible." In light of this action item, two months ago the Building & Safety, Planning, and Public Works Directors, and the City Manager and Economic Development/Housing Manager initiated review of the current permitting processes to identify problems and opportunities. This review will focus on the recent permitting experience by a local. Challenges both the applicant and City staff experienced during this process have provided an opportunity for internal assessment as well as open dialogue with the applicant and his representatives in an effort to pinpoint process challenges and afford solutions. As noted in the October 2, 2012 Department Report, multiple commercial broker meetings were conducted this past summer. The interaction with local brokers was initiated by City staff to facilitate the exchange of information. City staff is particularly interested in challenges and successes experienced by retail/commercial clients as they select locations, and work through the City's permitting process to open or expand operations. This information is tremendously helpful as the City works to improve permitting efficiency. The meetings also provided City staff an opportunity to update brokers on this effort. The current service delivery options review will generate recommendations that may change the building, planning and public works processes. Thus, recommendations regarding permit process improvements will be part of the service delivery option recommendations. 11 340 DEPARTMENT REPORT: o `k OF Io c&'�t 4 4 Qu&& MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Aothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: October 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Report for September 2012 1. The City's new "GORequest" citizen relationship management system will allow the staff to use the latest technology to be as responsive to citizens as possible. Citizens can download a free app to their iPhone, iPad or Android phone and submit requests for City services. The system allows citizens to track their requests and receive status updates. In addition to handling requests for service from the public, the GORequest system will be used by the Public Works Department as a work order system that will eliminate paperwork, and more accurately track costs associated with completing work orders. The new system is anticipated to go live in December 2012. 2. During the month of September, crews responded to 47 requests for city service through the City's on-line "request for City service" for graffiti removals, pothole repairs, street signs maintenance, additional street sweeping, debris removal, parks inspection and landscape lighting repairs. 3. The contractor for the Adams Street Bridge Improvement project is currently constructing the bridge falsework. The falsework will support the bridge deck construction. Progress on the project is being tracked at the Adams Street Bridge Project page on Facebook. The new completion date for the bridge is August 13, 2013. 341 4. The City Council will consider an Amendment to the cooperative agreement with the City of Indio for the Madison Street Improvements on October 16, 2012. The project is.anticipated to be advertised for bids by the end of October. 5. The contractor for the Washington Street and Avenue 48 Intersection Improvements has completed the median reconstruction on Avenue 48 as well as the widening of Washington Street and reconstruction of the new sidewalk. New handicap curb ramps have also been constructed. The contractor is currently demolishing the median on Washington Street to construct the additional left turn lane. The project is scheduled to be completed by the end of October. 6. A pre -construction meeting was held on September 11, 2012 for the stabilization of city owned properties project in the Village. Project work started October 10th and should be completed by the end of October. This project includes chemically stabilizing the dirt lots owned by the City as well as installing bollards and cable around the lots to protect them once they are stabilized. These measures are necessary to comply with Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and City dust control regulations. The contactor is currently waiting for delivery of the plastic posts. An agreement has been approved between the City and the La Quinta Arts Foundation to place gravel on the lots between the Library and Old Town. 7. City staff has reviewed and returned comments for the 35% submittal of the Washington and Highway 111 Intersection Improvement project. 8. The consultant for the Comprehensive Fee and Rate Study has completed the draft cost of service analysis, which identifies the City's estimated costs of providing fee -related development services. Outreach meetings with the Desert Valley Builders Association, the Building Industry Association and other stakeholders will be scheduled within the next 60 days. Once staff receives input from these groups the final draft study will be presented at a future City Council meeting. 9. Attached is the proposed construction schedule from the developer for the landscaping improvements on Madison Street, Monroe Street, it 34) Avenue 53 and Avenue 54 associated with the Madison Club development. 10. The department collected the following fees for the month of September 2012: September Major Encroachment Permit $76,466 Minor Encroachment Permit $0 Transportation Permit $147 PM Map/Plan Checking Fees $2,800 Parcel Merger/Lot Line Adjustment $0 Grading Permits $0 Driveway Permit $0 Tentative Parcel Map $0 Tentative Tract Map $0 Tentative Tract Map Time Ext. $0 Total Attachment 9,413 343 UP � \ � yam....... } 775 | � j\))/)\)k/ • z�0, ¥§#) . g f M, «.. .f :. 2;CO =,°?@G§f@\� ,.It, 344 345 DEPARTMENT REPORT: 9 Prepared for 346 1 Fable of Contents • Crime Statistics • Special Enforcement Team Report • Business District Officer Report • Business District Community Service Officer Report • School Resource Officer Report • Traffic Services Report • Community Service Officer Report • Monthly Volunteer Report • Significant Activity Report Ik 341 2 CRY of G ll 1 Ym 3 rc;, C tw m L I� �J L m n z 350 5 ei rl rl ei 'i rl rl 'i rl rl M 0 N N N N fOV N N N N N N N p p p p pO r}p O p p p p pFT m m O O .ti ti N N m m a a V1 Vl m m m m m m m m m m m m v a a m a a a a a m v w m m m m m m m m m m m m ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ It 351 6 NO L m .3 Cr J O oo,000s� �oiM �0.4 Y ,+ _ .F R h OZI w o^ao oo�� �n Vf N t0 Ch. t0 x-I O o I� ; cog s j+f O - o o O-- O m: : OO 117,E o .+ o o a'"ft 1 5tA^ 1 +a ll;k4 Lrl a , o,o to �e :ei r, N 0 L M P"�33•+ �. z oo o N V) .' > CwC K W Q �' W Co r ccx U tz x Woc 352 _ _ s � 4r� � y ' f •r 8 „Y r��_; � t k x Tk � k.v 353 $ la Quints Police SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 Officers from the La Quinta Special Enforcement Team conducted .follow-up investigation of a vehicle bur- glary that occurred last year. The suspect in the burglary was identified through his DNA, which was collect- ed from the original burglary scene. Officers conducted a probation search at the suspect's residence, located in the 52-100 block of Avenida Velasco, La Quinta. The suspect was arrested for possession of a controlled substance and being under the influence of a controlled substance. The suspect was also charged with the burglary. SET officers served a property related search warrant in the 85600 block of Avenida De La Rosa, Coachel- la. The search warrant stemmed from a residential burglary that occurred in the city of La Quinta. No addi- tional property was located during the service of the warrant. The suspect was arrested for residential bur- glary. La Quinta SET officers conducted follow-up investigation of a commercial burglary and strong arm robbery that occurred at a business in the 78900 block of Highway 111, La Quinta. Two suspects were identified and arrested for commercial burglary and robbery. Charges of burglary and robbery were filed with the District Attorney's Office on two additional suspects. Officers conducted a traffic enforcement stop on the area of Highway 111 and Adams Street, La Quinta. During the stop officers obtained probable cause to search the vehicle. Officers located two loaded hand- guns inside the vehicle. One of the guns was stolen from Colorado. Three suspects were arrested for pos- session of a loaded and concealed firearm and possession of stolen property. One suspect was also charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm and violation of parole. SET officers conducted a traffic stop at Highway 111 and Jefferson Street, La Quinta. During the stop the driver was arrested for a felony arrest warrant for robbery. The passenger was arrested for a felony arrest warrant for drug transportation. During the month of September, SET officers completed an enforcement program aimed at reducing crime and creating a better quality of life at the city's parks. During the program, one person was arrested for a felony warrant one person was issued a citation for possession of marijuana and two people were issued citations for sleeping in the park. Officers from La Quinta SET have contacted several subjects within the city of La Quinta which have result- ed in numerous arrests for narcotic violations, thefts, and outstanding warrants. La Quinta SET will contin- ue their pro -active and community oriented policing efforts throughout the city which will result in more arrests of drug dealers, thieves, and career criminals. The goal of La Quinta SET is to improve the quality of life for the residents of La Quinta by reducing crime. 354 0 TYPE OF ACTIVITY # of incidents TYPE OF ACTIVITY # of incidents` LA OUINTA LA QUINTA POLICE '`" Page 2 Significant Activity for September 2012 During the month of September, two new members have been added to the La Quinta Business District Team. Officer Newton has been replaced by officer Kibbey. In late September, Cpl. Reinbolz, from the La Quinta Special Enforce- ment Team, has been moved from Special Enforcement Team tojoin Officer Kibbey in combating the issues that arise along the Highway 111 corridor. In order to better serve the City of La Quinta, Officer Kibbey attended an Informant Management Course as well as a Search Warrant Preparation and Execution Course. Business District Officers assisted patrol deputies regarding a robbery that occurred at Kohl's by identifying all of the suspects involved in the crime. The primary suspect in the robbery was subsequently arrested along with all four of his associates. While at Kohl's, Business District Officers were able to identify two additional outstanding suspects involved in a commercial burglary at Kohl's. Members of the La Quinta Business District team authored a search warrant regarding a commercial burglary at .Target in an attempt to recover the stolen property; however no property has been recovered yet. The suspect in the robbery has been identified and the case will be filed with the Riverside County District Attorneys Orrice. Business District Officers identified a suspect in a theft from Wal-Mart which was confirmed by the Loss Prevention Department at the business. The suspect was also identified as a suspect in a commercial burglary at Target. Officer Kibbey and Cpl. Reinbolz, with the assistance of the La Quinta Special Enforcement Team, conducted a probation search of the sus- pect's residence and attempted to contact him at the location. However, at the time of the probation search the suspect was not home. Members of the Business District team identified a habitual suspect in burglaries from Wal-Mart which was con- firmed by Loss Prevention at the business. The Business District Team is in the process of completing a search warrant for the suspect's residence in an attempt to recover the stolen property and arrest the suspect. Business District Officers responded to Target regarding a female suspect who had been previously identified as a suspect in a commercial burglary at the business. Cpl Reinbolz arrested the female for the current burglary she was commit- ting and questioned her regarding the previous burglary. The female admitted to the previous burglary and both commercial burglary cases will be filed with the Riverside County District Attorneys Office. Business District Officers were patrolling the Highway 111 Corridor when they noticed a vehicle parked in the park- ing lot of AT&T after business hours. Business District Officer's conducted an occupied vehicle check and arrested a passen- ger of the vehicle for two outstanding warrants and possession of a methamphetamine pipe. 357 12 Significant Activity for September 2012 On -Thursday, September 20th , CSO Curia participated in Costco's Annual Employee Safety Fair. Pamphlets were distributed to the employee staff on topics such as Neighborhood Watch, Identity Theft and Child Safety. Mc Gruff "Crime Fighting Dog" was there to take photos with the employee's children. In addition, he distributed coloring books, whistles, slap bracelets, etc. Employees had the opportunity to see what it was like to simulate if they were physically impaired from alcohol while they operated a motor vehicle by wearing "Drunk Goggles". The goggles simulate if one blood/alcohol level would range from .08 to .15 over the legal limit for alcohol consumption. Employees were given a series of field sobriety tests (FST's) while wearing the goggles and understood that simple conditions we take for granted are quickly compromised while being under the influence of alcohol. Officer Philip Curia Community Service Officer If Type of. Activity Number of Incidents Reports q Online Reports 2 Calls for Service 7 Parking Citations 5 Towed Vehicles 0 Business Checks 6 Business Meetings 2 Community Events CPTED Reviews 0 On Thursday, September 27th, CSO Curia conducted'a meeting with the business owners of Old Town La Quinta. The meeting was hosted by Stuft Pizza (78015 Main St.). We discussed a number of topics, such as the Fall Newsletter, Business Watch Program Update, telephone chain, CPTED review of the business, crime statistics over the past six months and also a program called "Nextdoor.com". - In addition Sgt. Pickowitz introduced the new Business District Team that will now consist of Cpl. Reinbolz, Officer Kibbey and CSO Herrera. Sgt. Pickowitz responded to many questions from the business community. Everyone was very encouraged that the La Quinta Police is conducting these important meetings. We discussed the ongoing problem with customers being harassed by panhandlers. The La Quinta Police Department is working with all the property managers in the City of La Quinta to take further action in dealing with this problem. Property Managers have posted trespassing signs to notify the public. The property managers have cooperated with the police by assisting with the prosecution of persons arrested for trespassing. We encouraged the business community to report any problems or crime to the police. CSO Curia continues to patrol all the shopping centers and old town businesses of La Quinta keeping up with compliance of the municipal codes and the handling calls for theft, vehicle burglaries and lost property. 358 Significant Activity for September 2012 Officer Jessica Herrera Community Service Officer Community Service Officer Herrera is a new member of the Business District Team. She is replacing CSO Tom Fowler who retired in August of 2012. Community Service Officer Herrera has been employed with the Sheriffs Department for a little over six years. She started as an Office Assistant for the Indio Station for six months and then was Promoted to a Community Service Officer. In 2006,.she was assigned to the Coachella Community Policing Office for two and half years. Her responsibilities were interviewing victims and witnesses, and writing crime reports. She also performed complex clerical work requiring the application of laws, policies and procedures. She assisted the community with their questions, issues or concerns and directed them to the appropriate services, programs and resources. She provided support to the community by conducting safety and crime prevention meetings for the citizens and youth. CSO Herrera prepared a narrative and statistical end of month report for the Sheriff's Department and Coachella's City members. This report included calls for service for the month, number of crimes, response time, arrests and community programs. In 2009, CSO Herrera was transferred to the Property & Evidence Department. She was in charge of receiving evidence and had to ensure the security and chain of custody in our evidence facility. Her duties also included receiving, identifying, categorizing, preserving and storing evidence appropriately without tainting or contaminating the evidence. She assisted law enforcement personnel, prosecution and defense attorneys with the release of items for court. She also released property and evidence to the public and destroyed evidence when appropriate. With her experience CSO Herrera will be able to bring all her knowledge to the City of La Quinta. She will be working closely with the Business District CSO and Deputies to provide crime prevention to our businesses and residents. This month she has redesigned the end of month report and with the request of the city has created a new statistical chart and graph. She is also in the process of inquiring about updating the Police Department website to make it more user friendly and visually appealing for our residents. She is taking on a new project and is researching a way to provide safety tips as well as communicate with our business and residents through a social network. She is in contact with two representatives from Sharetronix.com and Nextdoor.com. She is exploring which one of these programs will be beneficial and efficient so that we can communicate with business managers and citizens through a social network that will be convenient On Sept 12th, 19th CSO Herrera attended a Crime Free Multi Housing meeting and a CPTED training. Sept 27th, she assisted CSO Curia with a Crime Prevention Meeting for the business owners in Old Town La Quinta. 359 14 La Quints Police MONTHLYSCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT SCHOOLS: La Quinta High School DEPUTY: REBECCA SMITH Reports 13 County Citations 1 Arrests 9 Pedestrian Checks 19 Y.A.T Referral 4 Business Checks 1 D.A. Filings 5 Follow-up 8 Vehicle Checks 6 Public Assist 6 City Park Checks 24 SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 On September 12, 2012, at approximately 1430 hours, I observed several males and one female at the La Quinta Park. I did not recognize the group as normally being in the area. We observed some of the group cross the street and enter the parking lot of the school. At that time I decided to make contact with the group to obtain their identities and reason for being on campus. I knew four of the juveniles from middle school but was unfamiliar with one adult male who had tattoos identifying himself as a gang member from "Campo." The group stated they were here to pick up a freshman. I positioned security around the parking lot so we could observe the group. A few minutes after school let out we observed two males, including one from the group we were watching, start to fight. We were able to detain both males and then I called for additional units to assist with the group that was forming around us as we were breaking up the fight. Deputies arrived and we were able to identify the vehicle the group showed up in and obtain identifying information on the rest of the group who remained at the park. Investigation revealed that the two males were affiliates of rival gangs. A week later I obtained video of the males fighting in the La Quinta Cove prior to school starting. Charges are pending. On September 25, 2012, during lunch I was riding in the school's golf cart with one of my security agents and we came around a corner to see two males standing closely together but based on their body lan- guage they appeared to be close to having a physical altercation. The agents contacted both males and I recog- nized one as a student who we have interacted with multiple times due to his explosive behavior. While the agents were trying to calm him down he bumped one of the agents in the chest with his shoulder. I went over to him and told him he was going to the office and he continued to yell expletives at us. I attempted to place him in handcuffs and the juvenile started to actively fight with us. After a struggle he was placed in handcuff ind placed up against the wall. From that position the male kicked me and tried to slip his cuffs. After the students were in class we brought the male to the office. Investigation revealed he was just involved in a phys- cal altercation with his girlfriend prior to our arrival. The juvenile was booked on four felony and two misde- neanor counts at Juvenile Hall. The case is pending. 15 360 L@ Quint@ Police MONTHLYSCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT SCHOOLS: Summit High School/ Col. Mitchell Paige Middle School/ Horizon Continuation School DEPUTY: CHRISTOPHER TRUEBLOOD Reports 16 Business/Ped/A.Checks/T.Stops 16 Arrests 14 Public Assists 5 D.A. Filings 14 Follow-up 4 Traffic Citations 9 Assist Other Agencies 6 Calls for Service 17 SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY FOR SEPTEMBER 2012 On Monday September 10, 2012 at approximately 1058 hours I arrested four students at Summit High School stemming from a fight in the hallway. A 17 year -old Hispanic male juvenile and an 18 year - old, Jesse Felix Gomez, engaged in a mutual fight in the Summit High School Hallway. A female teacher, Melissa Labayog, intervened and was between the two students when the 17 year -old male struck her in the side of the head from behind knocking her unconscious. While taking that male into custody, a 17 year -old Hispanic female juvenile struck him in the face approximately four times. The 17 year -old males 16 year - old brother attempted to intervene in my arrest and was arrested for obstruction, all of the juveniles in the fight were charged with battery. The juveniles were released to parents and the adult was booked into custo- dy at the Indio Jail. The following day, I learned the teacher had sustained a broken nose, perforated ear drum, partial vision loss and a concussion as a result of the juveniles punch to the right side of her face. I contacted the District Attorney's Office and they are pursuing charges of 245(a)(4) PC — Assault with a deadly weapon against the 17 year -old male as an adult. The teacher will have to undergo reconstructive surgery and has lost 20% vision in her right eye and is unsure when she will be able to return to work. She has raised safety concerns about Summit High School to the Desert Sands Unified School District regarding the amount of violent students that attend the school. The district has in turn authorized a second security agent for the site until further notice. #LA I22540024 On Tuesday September 11, 2012 at approximately 1000 hours I responded to another fight in a classroom at Summit High School. While escorting a student who was detained for fighting, two gang affil- iated students attempted to get the student body to throw things at me and "Rush" me. Those students were detained as well and suspended for five days. As none of the students around responded to their attempts to get the student body to rush me, no criminal charges were able to be filed against them. On this day two 361 16 Page 2 different students were arrested for possession of Marijuana and possession of graffiti tools. The students were suspended and charges were filed out of custody for the aforementioned charges. #LA122550025 and LA122550021. On Monday September 17, 2012 I received a tip regarding a 16 year -old Hispanic male juvenile who had been tagging the entire campus of Summit High School over the past two years the damages were estimated to be approximately $10,000. I began to gather evidence against the juvenile and gained enough evidence to author a search warrant for his residence and arrest him on the charges. On Thursday September 20, 2012 I served the search warrant at 53330 Avenida Mendoza in the city of La Quints at approximately 1530 hours. Inside the residence I lo- cated numerous graffiti tools and evidence linking the suspect to numerous incidents of graffiti within the city. The juvenile was arrested and booked into the Indio Juvenile Hall for felony graffiti. Numerous other reports that had been suspended will be filed out of custody against the suspect now that his moniker has been confirmed. This will continue to be an ongoing investigation due to the number of outstanding open/suspended reports involving the moniker "MOBR". #LAI22610024 On Friday September 21, 2012 at approximately 0900 hours I arrested a 16 year -old Hispanic male juvenile at Summit High School for possession of graffiti tools and threatening a public official. I was supervising passing period for Summit High School when the student began approaching me making hand gestures in the form of a gun. The student continued to make the gesture toward me as he walked past me into the classroom. I called the student back out of the classroom at which point he made the gesture of a gun at me again and made a sound with his mouth as if the guns were being fired while he said "You locked up my homie" (referring to the student I had just served a search warrant on the day prior). The student was found in possession of an etching tool and is currently on proba- tion for graffiti. He was arrested and booked into the Indio Juvenile Hall for 71 PC — Threatening a school official and 594.2(a) PC — Possession of graffiti tools. On Friday September 28, 2012 at approximately 1100 hours I arrested a 14 year -old Caucasian juvenile from Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School for 148(a)(1) PC and 11.56.030 LQMC — Resisting and truancy, near the intersection of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive. A school official had reported seeing the juvenile tru- ant and advised me. I drove to the area and attempted to make contact with the juvenile at which time he fled from me toward southwest community church running into traffic on Fred Waring. I pursued him on foot and witnessed him throw away and unknown item into the bushes during the pursuit. The juvenile was apprehended by a sergeant who was already in the parking lot of the church where the juvenile was running. The juvenile was booked into the Indio Juvenile Hall for the aforementioned charges, a search of the bushes was unsuccessful in locating whatever he threw. The juvenile claimed he had thrown a dead snake he had found. 362 17 La OWN Police MONTHLYSCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER REPORT SCHOOLS: La Quints Middle School, Harry Truman Elementary, Ben Franklin. Elementary, and John Adams Elementary DEPUTY: KERRI HARLAN STATISTICS: Reports 4 Pedestrian Checks Arrests 0 Business Checks Y.A.T Referrals 0 Follow-up D.A. Filings 0 Public Assist SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY FOR SEPTEBMER 2012 I have visited and introduced myself to the Boys & Girls Club, as well as the YMCA located on Park St. X Ave. 50. I advised these local youth organizations to feel free to contact me if they have any concerns regarding a student or group of children. I have assisted with patrolling La Quinta High School, when Deputy Smith or Deputy Trueblood has had other priorities that have diverted their attention. I make sure our presence is known, even though I am not who they are used to seeing. The La Quinta Park on Blackhawk Way has been a sore spot for the community lately. It continues to be a focus so the residents of La Quinta feel comfortable when there. I participated in a search warrant, along with Deputy Smith and Deputy Trueblood. It was successful and resulted in an arrest for Deputy Trueblood. I have attempted to deal with parents calling in to La Quinta Middle School reference rock throwing at the school bus stop, a student acting reckless in the street, and students stepping off the curb near the city bus, although no students were identified. Extra presence on my behalf in the problem areas has seemed to make a difference. The rock throwing issue overflowed on to the campus, where the students were identified and disciplined. No criminal action was needed as no one was seriously injured. The Project Safe Neighborhood program put on by DA Mike Tripp is scheduled for Wed., Nov. 7. This project was coordinated by the school Counselor. In speaking with the Counselor about future programs, we have discussed numerous topics. I will be emailing him about specific speakers to see we canget approval from administration. 363 18 rafflC Team Report SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY REPORT The City of La Quinta received 51 calls for service for Traffig Collisions for the month of July. Of those calls for service, 28 (55%) were documented in written reports. Of those docu- mented collisions, 82% of reports have been entered into the Crossroads Collision Database and provide the following information: The city of La Quinta saw a 27% increase in the number of traffic collisions on public road- ways for August 2012 in comparison to July. Overall, collision activity for 2012 has de- creased 10.63 in comparison 2011. The number of collision resulting in injury has increased by on (33%)in comparison to last month. Hit and Run Collisions have increased 300% for August which has increased our overall MS and Run collisions by 16% in comparison to last year. Overall Bicycle and Pedestrian Colli- sions still remain minimal. Public roadway collision activity was highest on Fridays, with most collisions occurring be- tween the hours of 12.00om and 4.00pm. Unsafe Speed accounted for % of collisions while Unsafe Lane Changes accounted for 7�39 ¢ of collisions for the City of La Quinta. As a result, La Quinta Traffic Services focus their attention toward education and enforcement of drivers who violate these traffic laws and further focus enforcement toward high collision areas. Since it takes a significant period of time to compile data, the monthly Traffic Collision Sta- tistics and Data Report contain only those reports which have been completed. In keeping with all developing trends, traffic services constantly shifts its focus to meet the leading causes of collisions within the city. LA Qu1NTA POUCEi Month of August Table of contents: Significant Activity I Monthly Collisions 2 Traffic Collisions 3 Report Monthly Collisions 4 Stats Primary Collision 5 Factor Primary Collision 6 Factor MOTOR TEAM: • SGT. PICKOWITZ • CPL OLSON • OFFICER SCOTT • OFFICER MOORE • OFFICER PALMER 364 1=12 City of La Quinta La Quinta Police Department Monthly Traffic Collisions Type - Hour - Day Month: August Year: 2012 Type of Traffic Collision" � 1. Fatal Collisions Ttits:Ntorith 0 LastMonth 0 % ` Change To:DateTo This'=Year 0 To Date ' Last Year, 2 %': ' -,,Change -100 2. Persons IGlled 0 0 0 2 -100 3. Injury Collisions 4 3 33 45 48 -6 4. Persons Injured 6 3 100 63 62 2 5. P.D. Collisions 19 12 58 177 194 -9 6. H&R Collisions - Parked 0 1 -100 9 18 -50 7. H&R Collisions - Moving 8 2 300 37 32 16 8. Vehicle vs. Bicyclist 0 0 4 4 0 9. Motor Vehicles in Traffic 17 12 42 156 148 5 10. H.B.D. Collisions 1 3 -67 17 21 -19 11. Vehicle vs. Pedestrian 1 0 6 9 -33 12. Vehicle vs. Object 4 1 2 100 24 46 4L Total Collisions 23 1 15 53 222 244 -9 Type of Traffic Collision 00,00 04 00 07:59 0B..' 11 58 12:00', 15 59 16 00. 19,69„ 20 00•r 25 59= ^ Unk. Total` -• 1. Fatal Collisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. Persons Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. Injury Collisions 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 4 4. Persons Injured 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 6 5. P.D. Collisions 0 1 4 7 4 3 0 19 6. H&R Collisions - Parked 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7. H&R Collisions - Moving 0 1 1 2 2 2 0 8 B. Vehicle vs. Bicyclist 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Motor Vehicles in Traffic 0 1 4 5 4 3 0 17 10. H.B.D. Collisions 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11. Vehicle vs. Pedestrian 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 12. Vehicle vs. Object 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 4 Total Collisions 0 1 1 1 4 1 9 1 5 4 0 23 Type afTrafBc'CQllision. , .' Sup" Mon Tue = 'Wed,' SsAt Totah:>; 1. Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2. Persons I011ed 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3. Injury Accidents 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 4. Persons Injured 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 6 5. P.D. Accidents 0 2 3 0 6 5 3 19 6. H&R Accidents - Parked 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 7. H&R Accidents - Moving 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 B S. Vehicle vs Bicyclist 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Motor Vehicles in Traffic 0 1 3 1 5 4 3 17 10. H.B.D. Accidents 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 11. Vehicle vs. Pedestrian 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 12. Vehicle vs. Object 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 4 Total Accidents 0 2 3 1 1 6 1 8 3 1 23 20 365 City of La Quints La Quints Police Department 1M2 Monthly Traffic Collisions Report Au ust 2012 Current Month New YTD Last nD Chanae Total TIC - Public Highway 19 185 207 -10.63% Fatal Collisions 0 0 2 -100.00% Number Killed 0 0 2 -100.00% Injury Collisions 3 37 39 5.13% Number Injured 4 54 51 5.88% Property Damage 16 148 166 -10.84% Type of Collision Hit & Run 7 34 37 -8.11 % Private Property, 4 37 37 0.00% Bicycle Collisions 0 3 4 -25.00% Number Injured - Bicycle Collisions 0 3 3 •0.00% Vehicle vs. Pedestrian 0 3 3 0.00% Alcohol involved 0 13 18 -27.78% Reports Taken ey Patrol 18 177 229 -22.71% Target Team 2 8 9 -11.11% Traft 2 29 11 163.64% DUTY UNKNOWN 2 6 0 0 Detective 0 1 SRO 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% TOTAL REPORTS 23 222 244 -9.02% Counter Reports 96 DUI Arrests Hit and Run Prfnwv Collision Factors Number % Toml Unsafe Speed 9 39.13% Unsafe lane Change 4 17.39% Unsafe Sterling or Backing 2 8.70% Unknown 2 8.70% Traffic Signals and Signs 2 8.70% Improper Turning 2 8.70% Driving Under Influence 1 4.35% 21 3 6 6 0 0.00% City of La Quints La Quints Police Department Monthly Traffic Collision Statistics Montle: Au us Year. 2012 Primary Collision Factor. Excessive Speed Secondary Collision Factor. Unsafe Tumina Tertiary Collision Factor. Scans and Shams Day of Week When Majority Occurs: Friday Time of Day When Majority Occurs: 12:00 to 16:� Too 3 Locations Where Majority Occur. Rank Location Collisions 1 Fred Waring or / Washington St 3 2 Dune Palms Rd 1 Hwy 111 2 3 77760 Coachella or Eisenhower 1 3 78862 Hwy 111 / Hwy 111 1 3 A St / Duns Palms Rd 1 3 Adams St / N Harland Drive 1 3 Adams St / Westward No 1 3 Ave 481 Dune Palms Rd 1 3 Ave 481 Washington St 1 3 Ave 601 Washington St 1 3 Avenida Fernando / Avenida Obregon 1 3 Avenida Ramirez I Calls Nogales 1 3 Cuddine In Frond Of 78680 Highway 1111 Staples Par 1 3 Dune Palms Rd / Fred Waring Dr 1 3 Eisenhower or / Washington St 1 3 Fred Waring or Palm Royale or 1 3 Hwy 1111 La Quints Center Or (M 1 3 Hwy 111 / Plana La Quints 1 3 Sagebrush Av / Washington St 1 '67 22 k I � k e §� 0 a § � .� , §© � 0 § � 0 0 |, g at It IN _ _._ _ 0. . | :C . Is ■ ■ c k ® k C 2 § CL E� d 2 § § F I It 368 23 � S o c C 0 w � � o $d o d N N C +. C 3 O L7 N N 0 t) 0 � � o g a c Col m N YC m U C LL V o o E 5 c F t07 w N tt MJ Cl m C W d O > m > m IN 1It I N N M " 363 24 La Ouinta CSO • Officer Melinda Lopez • Officer David Kruger • Officer Bridget Delaney Summary of Activity for September 2012 Type of Activity Number of Incidents Burglary Reports 11 Grand/Petty Theft Reports 8 Vandalism/ Malicious Mischief Reports 4 Traffic Collision Response 16 Vehicle Code or Parking Citations 13 Abandoned Vehicle Tagged/Warning 5 Towed Vehicles 7 Lost or Found Property Reports 4 Custodial/Noncustodial Transports 14 Miscellaneous Calls , 33 . 370 25 Community Policing Office Number Citizens on Patrol Number Monthly Volunteer Horns 151 Patrol Hours 101 Hours Year to Date 1,397.5 Y.T.D Patrol Hours 938.5 Hours 4/03 to Present 28,010 Hours 7/06 to Present 9,683 CPO Monthly Visits 66 Neighborhood Patrol 47 CPO Year to Date Visits 694 Business Checks 106 CPO Visits 4/03 to present 19,985 Traffic Collision Response 1 Vacation Checks 5 Miscellaneous Activities 1 Summary of Activity for September 2012 There are currently have ten active volunteers who staff and maintain the Community Policing Office in Old Town La Quints. One These volunteers do a variety of data entry functions as well as assist the community. We have five Citizens on Patrol volunteers serving our community. They continue assisting with patrol and drone car operations in the business district. Volunteers also assist with La Quinta High School football games. There are currently four volunteer applicants going through a background check, future interviews will be scheduled next month. Danese Maldonado Volunteer Coordinator 91 City of 'Gem of the Dosed" SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY REPORT Captain Andrew Shouse Interim Chief of Police Saturday, September 1, 2012 01:45 AM: Officers responded to a disturbance at McDonalds in La Quinta, and arrested Arthur Suarez (30 yrs of Indio) for public intoxication. BEAT 40 Sunday. September 2, 2012 11:30 PM: La Quinta SET Officer Miguel Ramos conducted a traffic stop at Avenida Bermudas and Avenida Montezuma. Nora Garcia (25 yrs of Thermal was arrested for possession of stolen credit cards, possession of drug paraphernalia and violation of probation. Monday, September 3, 2012 5:16 AM: Officers responded to a suspicious person call in the 42000 block of Washington Street, and arrested Edward Andrew Medina (48 yrs of Bermuda Dunes) for possession of methamphetamine. BEAT 40 Tuesday, September 4, 2012 No significant activity Wednesday, September 5, 2012 2:02 AM: Officers responded to disturbance at Wal-Mart, and arrested Anthony Chavez (25 yrs of La Quinta) and Steven Swanson (25 yrs of La Quinta). BEAT 41 4:12 AM: Officers responded to a disturbance in the area of Avenida Bermudas and Avenida Montezuma, and arrested Timothy Kearney (54 yrs of La Quinta) for public intoxication. BEAT 43 Thursday. September 6, 2012 No significant activity 1 372 27 Friday, September 7, 2012 2:11 AM: Officers conducted a vehicle check in the area of Avenida Ramirez and Calle Tecate, and arrested Alex Lopez (20 yrs of La Quinta) for possession of Methamphetamine, possession of heroin, and possession of a loaded firearm. BEAT 43 0436 hours: Officers conducted a vehicle stop in the area of Hwy I I I and Washington Street and arrested Jose De Jesus Jimenez-Prado (24 yrs of Palm Springs) for DUI. BEAT 41 7:30 AM: SET Officers with the assistance of Coachella CAT, and patrol, served a property related search warrant at 85621 Avenida De La Rosa, Coachella. The warrant stemmed from a residential burglary that occurred on 04/29/12 in north La Quinta. No additional stolen property was located; however, Christopher Melendez (21 yrs of Coachella) was arrested for burglary. BEAT 40 12:05 PM: Officers responded to a theft call at Stater Brothers, and arrested Enrique Meza (44 yrs of Indio) for burglary. BEAT 41 Saturday, September 8, 2012 10:47 AM: Officers responded to a reckless driver call at the Beer Hunter, and Susanne Castle (57 yrs of Cathedral City) was arrested for driving on a suspended license and possession of stolen property. BEAT 41 Sunday, September 9, 2012 10:38 PM: Officers responded to a major injury traffic collision in the area of Avenue 50 east of Park Avenue. The collision involved two vehicles, in which, one of occupant was deceased at the scene, and three others were transported to Desert Hospital with life -threatening injuries. BEAT 43 Mondav, September 10, 2012 5:35 PM: Officers responded to burglary call at Wal-Mart (79295 Hwy 111), and arrested Jay Groth (50 yrs of Bermuda Dunes) for burglary and possession methamphetamine and heroin. BEAT 41 Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:10 AM: Officer responded to a disturbance on the 51000 block of Avenida Ramirez, and arrested Jose Valenciano (50 yrs transient) for violation of a domestic violence restraining order. BEAT 43 1:45 PM: Officers conducted a traffic stop at Highway I I I and Adams St, and arrested Jesus Sanchez (33 yrs, of Coachella) for a felony arrest warrant for burglary and a misdemeanor warrant for DUI. BEAT 41 2 1 373 28 9:58 PM: Officers responded to a robbery call at Kohl's, and arrested Cynthia Castro (32 yrs of Indio), Anita Cardenas 25 of La Quinta), Ruth Easley (35 yrs of Coachella), Juan Jose Gaytan (31 yrs of Indio), and one juvenile male for robbery and possession of stolen property. BEAT 41 Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:00 PM: Officers responded to a disturbance call on the 45000 block of Deerbrook Drive, and arrested Adraina Rosas (37 yrs of La Quinta) for a felony arrest warrant for burglary and receiving stolen property warrant. BEAT 40 Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:03 AM: Officers conducted a traffic stop at Seeley Road and Washington Street, and arrested Raquel Zarate (34 yrs of Blythe) for under the influence of a controlled substance. BEAT 40 2:00 AM: Officers conducted a pedestrian check in the area of Dune Palms Road and Corporate Drive, and arrested a juvenile male for a no bail warrant. BEAT 41 6:17 PM: Officers conducted a traffic stop on Dune Palms Road in front of the Dune Palms Mobile Home Park, and arrested Raymond Rodriguez (22 yrs of Indio) for possession of a controlled substance. BEAT 40 Friday. September 14, 2012 2:50 PM: Officers responded to a burglary call at Target, and arrested three male juveniles for burglary and resisting arrest. BEAT 41 11:20 PM: Officers responded to a suspicious person call in the area of Hwy I I I and Costco Drive, and arrested Gonzalo Pinedo (37 yrs of Indio) for public Intoxication. BEAT 41 Saturday, September 15, 2012 1:39 AM: Officers responded to a traffic collision call in the area of Avenue 48 and Dune Palms Road, and arrested Felipe Tello (31 yrs of Indio) for driving under the influence of alcohol and possession of cocaine. BEAT 42 2:00 AM: Officers responded to a disturbance call on the 44000 block of Via Terra Nova, and Victor Ramirez (27 yrs of La Quinta) for a domestic violence warrant. BEAT 40 Sunday, September 16, 2012 4:53 PM: Officers responded to a traffic collision call in the area of Avenida Navarro and Calle Colima, and arrested Thomas Meade (28 yrs of La Quinta) driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs. BEAT 43 3 374 29 Monday, September 17, 2012 9:41 AM: Officers responded to suspicious persons call in the area of Washington Street and Avenue 48, and arrested Patrichia Fay (50 yrs of Desert Hot Springs) for being under the influence of alcohol and toluene. BEAT 42 8:20 PM: Officers responded to a disturbance call on the 52000 block of Eisenhower Drive, and arrested Jasmine Hernandez (29 yrs of La Quinta) for public intoxication. BEAT 43 Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:07 PM: Officers responded to a domestic violence call on the 45000 Desert Fox Drive, and arrested Joseph Aldape (36 yrs of La Quinta) for domestic battery. BEAT 40 Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:18 PM: Officers conducted a pedestrian check at Eisenhower Drive and Calle Colima, and arrested Raquel Clavio (30 yrs of La Quinta) for two felony warrants for grand theft. BEAT 43 2:51 PM: Officers conducted a vehicle stop at Avenida Ramirez and Calle Durango, and arrested Jennifer Carrillo (30 yrs of La Quinta) and Travis Rhodes (27 yrs of La Quinta) for being under the influence of a controlled substance. BEAT 43 Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:39 AM: Officers responded to a vehicle collision call in the area of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive, and arrested Ericka Austin (25 yrs of La Quinta) for DUI. BEAT 40 12:11 PM: Officers respond to a theft call at the Kohl's, and arrested Columbus Bums (57 yrs of Desert Hot Springs) for burglary. BEAT 41 1:08 PM: School Resource Officer conducted an on -going investigation into several vandalisms at Summit High School. The investigation led to the arrest of a 16 year old male student for felony vandalism. With the assistance of La Quinta SET, a search warrant was served at the juvenile's residence on the 53000 block of Avenida Mendoza. During the search warrant, evidence was located linking the juvenile suspect to numerous vandalisms within the city. BEAT 43 Friday. September 21, 2012 9:17 PM: Officers conducted a vehicle stop at Washington Street and Hwy 111, and arrested Yvonne Morales (18 yrs of Indio) for DUI. BEAT 41 10:54 PM: Officers conducted a vehicle check on Hwy I I I and Adams Street, and arrested Christopher Yslas (26 yrs of Desert hot Springs) for two felony warrants and possession of a pipe. BEAT 41 4 6 37-0 30 Saturday, September 22, 2012 2:01 AM: Officers conducted a vehicle stop in the area of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico, and arrested Christian Ernst Lewis-Chalupa (27 yrs of Eureka) for two felony narcotics warrants and possession.for sales of narcotics. BEAT 43 3:56 AM: Officers responded to a disturbance call on the 50000 block of Washington Street, and arrested Maurice Burrell (28 yrs of La Quinta) for public intoxication. BEAT 43 Sunday, September 23, 2012 No significant activity Monday, September 24, 2012 No significant activity Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:00 PM: Officers responded to a theft call at Wal-Mart, and arrested Marvin Keith Gubter (53 yrs of Indio) for possession of methamphetamine and burglary. BEAT 41 Wednesday, September 26, 2012 No significant activity Thursday, September 27, 2012 No significant activity Friday, September 28, 2012 12:38 AM: SET Officers conducted a vehicle stop in the parking lot of Taco De Ojo (78-902 Hwy 111), and arrested Henry Bravo III (18 yrs of Indio), Edgar Machado (19 yrs of Indio), and Synida Mondragon (18 yrs of Coachella) for possession of a loaded/concealed firearm and possession of stolen property. Machado was also charged with violation of parole. BEAT 41 3:30 PM: SET Officers conducted a vehicle stop on Highway I I I east of Jefferson St., and arrested Jose Sauceda (23 yrs of Coachella) for a felony drug warrant and Herman Bustamante (21 yrs of Indio) for a felony robbery warrant. BEAT 41 Saturday, September 29, 2012 12:46 AM: Officers responded to a disturbance call in the area of Avenida Alvarado and Calle 5 31 370 Colima, and arrested Sarah Maruto (19 yrs of Cathedral City) for public intoxication. BEAT 43 9:38 AM: Officers responded to a domestic disturbance on the 78000 block of Spyglass Hill Dr, and arrested Sina Eng (29 yrs of La Quinta) for domestic battery. BEAT 40 Sunday. September 30, 2012 9:40 AM: Officers conducted a vehicle stop on Jefferson St. and Fred Waring Dr., and arrested Willie Earl Thompson (38 yrs of Indio) for an outstanding felony drug warrant. BEAT 40 10:02 PM: Officers responded to a disturbance call at the Beer Hunter Sports Pub & Grill (78- 483 Hwy 111), and arrested Mark Ortiz (30 yrs of Indio) for felony spousal abuse. BEAT 41 6 377 32. oRNIA DEPARTMj �y RESTSy & FIRE PROTEC ,01 CAL FIRE SINCE 1885 *lit r � Cowry F=o IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION John R. Hawkins - Fire Chief 210 West San Jacinto Avenue - Perris, CA 92570 (951)940-6900-www.rvcfire.org 'ROUDLY SERVING THE October 5, 2012 ININCORPORATED AREAS _ IF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ,ND THE CITIES OF Honorable Mayor Adolph Members of the City Council TANNING City of La Quinta IEAUMONT P.O. Box 1504 :AUMESA La Quinta, CA 92253 :ANYON LAKE Ref: Quarterly Report :OACHELLA )ESERT HOT SPRINGS Please find the attached Fire Department Quarterly Report for the City of La Quinta. This report covers the 3`d quarter of 2012. ASNALE 4DIAN WELLS Riverside County Fire Department units responded to a total of 638 calls for service YDIO within the City of La Quinta. These responses are broken down into the following - URUPA VALLEY classifications: AKE ELSINORE • Medical Emergencies 455 AQUINTA • False Alarms - 88 AENIFEE • Structure Fires 4 40RENO VALLEY • Wildland Fires 0 +ORCO • Rescues (vehicle accidents, entrapments) 28 • Other Fires (refuse, vehicle, etc.) 6 ALM DESERT • Public Service Assists (non -emergency assistance) 46 'ERRIS • Fire Menace Standby (fuel spills, gas leaks etc.) 11 2ANCHO MIRAGE tUBIDOUX CSD ;AN JACINTO Below is a summary of various activities and events that occurred in the city in during the third quarter of 2012. EMECULA VILDOMAR • SPECIAL EVENTS IOARD OF IUPERVISORS: O September l l - La Quinta Firefighters attend annual 9/11 Candlelight Ice BUSTER Vigil. event at the Civic Center Campus. DISTRICT 1 OHN TAVAGLIONE • PERSONNEL TRANSACTIONS DISTRICT 2 o Firefighter / Paramedic Kristopher Davis has been promoted to Fire EFF STONE .Apparatus Engineer / Paramedic within the La Quinta Battalion DISTRICT 3 O New Firefighter / Paramedics in the Battalion are: OHN BENOIT ■ Brandon Avner - DISTRICT 4 ■ Morgan Peterson . 4ARION ASHLEY • Ryan Babb DISTRICT 5 371 E LQ Firefighter with Mayor Adolph and local resident at 9/11 Candlelight Vigil 2 Vehicle traffic collision on Ave 50 Vehicle into a residential structure EMERGENCY ACTIVITY o July 5 — Engine 93 from the North La Quinta Station responded to a vegetation fire for structure defense in the Community of Anza, CA. This is another example or our Integrated, Cooperative, Regional Fire Protection System. o August 8 — Residential Structure Fire 80000 block of Via Valerosa, Mountain View Country Club. Firefighters found two golf carts burning inside of an attached garage. Fire damage contained to the garage area with smoke damage in the residence. Damage was estimated at $ 160,000 with a save of approximately $ 720,000 o August 15 — La Quinta Firefighters responded to traumatic injury incident at the construction site of the Adams St bridge. Firefighters found a male patient that had fallen approximately 100 feet from a crane while trespassing on the site. This patient was transported to Desert Regional Medical Center with serious injuries. o August 17 — La Quinta Firefighters responded to a near drowning in the Cove area of the City. Firefighters found a male patient unconscious and with diminished breathing upon arrival. Rapid Advance Life Support was initiated and the patient was transported to JFK Hospital in Indio. Prior to arrival to the hospital, the patient became conscious and was able to converse with paramedics. The patient is expected to make a full recovery o September 10 — La Quinta Firefighters responded to a traffic collision on Ave 50 near Park Ln. Upon arrival firefighters found two vehicles had collided with patients trapped. Tbree patients were treated by LQ paramedics and transported to Desert Regional with moderate to minor injuries. An additional forth patient unfortunately succumbed to injuries on scene. o September 16 — La Quinta Firefighters responded to a two vehicle traffic collision in the intersection of Calle Colima and Avd Navarro. One vehicle had landed into a vacant residential structure. After all patients were assessed, treated and transported, Firefighters secured the building from collapse as a result of the impact made from the vehicle. Respectfully submitted, John Hawkins County Fire Chief By:j�. Pete Blakemore Battalion Chief 380 3 La Quinta City Fire Responses (quarterly Totals dical Emergencies ® False Alarms ®Structure Fire ®Wildland Fires o Rescues ■ Other Fires ■Public Service Assists ■ Fire Menace Standby JULY AUG SEP Totals Medical Emergencies 148 182 125 455 False Alarms 38 30 20 88 Structure Fire 1 3 0 4 Wildland Fires 0 0 0 0 Rescues 7 13 8 28 Other Fires 4 1 2 1 0 6 Public Service Assists 19 1 20 1 7 46 Fire Menace Standby 4 1 2 1 5 1 11 TOTALSI 221 1 262 1 165 1 638 381 4 U\� /)� �#» dkq CdC■ LL k� °c # a ■ � )IL )! I _ C.)0_ } t ;� - - C & cm W ,I 2 { mOr a k � ] > k 2 ) 0 3k �� � 2 ■ 333 6 M ITY SA/HA/FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Approving Proposals and Authorizing the City Manager to Submit Applications to Riverside County Economic Development Agency for Community Development Block Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2013 /2014 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council allocating the use of Community Development Block Grant funds totaling an estimated $175,000 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 to: the Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta Unit for the Fee Waiver/Reduction Program ($30,000); and to the City of La Quinta for public facility improvements along Calle Sinaloa ($145,000). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of La Quinta has participated in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (RCEDA) since 1983. The City has traditionally funded two participants: a Public Service program with the Coachella Valley Boys and Girls Club, La Quinta unit (CVBGC), and a Public Facilities program for the City of La Quinta's Capital Improvement Projects. This year, approximately $175,000 in CDBG funds are estimated to be available to the City. The City received three (3) applications requesting CDBG funding for Fiscal Year 2013/2014: one public facilities request from the City's Public Works Department for infrastructure improvements along Calle Sinaloa ($145,000), and two requests for public service funds from the CVBGC ($30,000), and the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) ($32,762). Historically, the City has funded only one public service agency request. Staff is recommending allocation of the maximum amount of funds available for public services, in the amount of $30,000, to the CVBGC fee waiver/reduction program, as the program has proven to be both effective and meaningful for low- and moderate -income youth within the City. 384 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Upon approval by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of the County of Riverside Urban County CDBG monies, the City will be eligible for approximately $175,000 in funds for the project(s) identified in the Resolution. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The CDBG program is an important source of special program funding for the City of La Quinta. Funding is available annually from RCEDA to participating cities for eligible activities which meet national objectives including: benefits to low- and moderate - income families, the elderly or handicapped; or aid in the elimination of slums or blight. The purpose of this hearing is to provide opportunity to review and comment on all applications, to take public comment, to select and identify proposals, and to reprogram funds if appropriate. Public Services Public service includes child care, recreation programs, and education programs, etc. The maximum amount of public service CDBG funds are limited each year by a program formula. Based upon an estimated fund allocation for Fiscal Year 2013/2014, a maximum of $30,000 is available for public service grants. In addition, RCEDA has set a minimum funding requirement for CDBG programs at $10,000. The CVBGC has requested $30,000 of CDBG funding to continue the membership fee waiver/reduction program. The program provides a fee waiver/reduction for certified low- and moderate -income families of La Quinta students to utilize day care and after school care services provided by the Boys and Girls Club in La Quinta. The fee waiver/reduction allows approximately 115 students to utilize these services. The CVHC has requested $32,762 of CDBG funding for their after school program at Wolff Waters Place. The after school program is administered by the CVHC and provide after school activities, such as computer class, tutoring, and homework assistance to approximately 300 school -age children who reside at the income restricted housing development. Both public service applications propose providing financial assistance to La Quinta students, allowing them to participate in the identified programs. Both of these programs provide great benefit to La Quinta students and their families. Historically, City Council has consistently awarded the public service funds to the Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta. City staff has monitored and audited use of these funds and has consistently observed proper use and benefit often exceeding the number of students originally identified in the application. Thus, staff supports continuing the awarding of CDBG public service funds to the Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta. uo� J g Boys & Girls Club La Quinta Unit un r48 .. $30,000 Fee Waiver/Reduction Program Coachella Valley Housing Coalition $32,732 After School Programs Capital Improvements An estimated allocation of $145,000 is available for capital improvements in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. The City of La Quinta Public Works Department has requested funding for the construction of ADA compliant curb -ramps and sidewalk improvements along Calle Sinaloa, between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive (Attachment 1). The project will improve pedestrian safety within the Cove Residential District and meets HUDs national objectives for the utilization of these funds City of La $145,000 Public Facility Improvement; i.e. construction of ADA Quinta compliant curb -ramps and sidewalk improvements along Calle Sinaloa, between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive Due to the aforementioned program formula that limits the amount of annual allocation that can be distributed to public service programs and services, the vast majority of CDBG funds are allocated to capital projects. However, there is not a program formula maximizing allocation to capital projects. Thus, 100% of the CDBG fund allocation can be distributed to capital improvement projects. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council could elect to not approve public service funding for the Boys and Girl Club of the Coachella Valley La Quinta Unit for Fee Waiver/Reduction Program, and approve public service funding for the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition's After School Programs. Alternatively, City Council could approve both public service funding requests for the Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley La Quinta Unit and the Coachella Valley Housing Coalitions request by providing $15,000 in funds to each applicant. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be distributed at the City Council meeting. ,UD Respectfully submitted, Attachment: 1. Location of proposed public improvements 337 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING PROPOSALS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Funds for FY 2013/2014 will be approximately $175,000 to begin July 1, 2013; and, WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta must submit to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency project applications; and, WHEREAS, a public notice was published on October 1, 2012 announcing the availability of funds, requesting proposals, and public hearing dates; and, WHEREAS, the merits of all proposals were openly discussed and considered; and, WHEREAS, by a majority vote of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, the following proposal(s), or reprogramming(s), were selected: PROJECT NAME 1. Public Facility Improvements along Calle Sinaloa, between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive 2. Fee Waiver/Reduction Program SPONSOR AMOUNT City of La Quinta $145,000 Boys & Girls Club $30,000 La Quinta Unit NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta as follows: 1. That the City of La Quinta does hereby select the above -named project(s) or reprogramming(s), for the use of Community Development Block Grant funds. 2. That the City Council hereby directs the City Manager to prepare and submit the designated applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency in a timely fashion proposing the named activities and use of funds. 338 City Council Resolution No. 2012- Community Development Block Grant Adopted: October 16, 2012 Page 2 3. If there is a shortfall in funding, the City Council directs the City Manager to request the County to increase the City's public service cap in order to fully fund public service approved applications. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 16" day of October, 2012, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor, City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: Susan Maysels. City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 339 ATTACHMENT 1 Area of Proposed Improvement City of La Quinta: RDA Project Area 1 Eisenhower Drive n 01 U) 7 0 a) Avenida Bermudas Desert Club Drive 15 ,- ■ 330 C&tyle 4 4 a" CIT / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of BUSINESS SESSION: _ Resolutions and Ordinances to Approve the Development Plans for the La Quinta Retirement Community, Located on CONSENT CALENDAR: Approximately 9.5 Acres Within the Centre Pointe Commercial Development, including a Mitigated Negative STUDY SESSION: Declaration, a Development Agreement Amendment, General PUBLIC HEARING: 22 and Specific Plan Amendments, a Zone Change, a Tentative Parcel Map, a Site Development Permit and an Assignment of a Disposition and Development Agreement. Applicant: Lenity Group, LLC RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Assessment 201 1-617; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving General Plan Amendment 2011-123, subject to the attached Findings; and, Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council approving Zone Change 201 1-140, subject to the attached Findings; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 36405, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 201 1-921, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval; and Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council approving Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 4, subject to the attached Findings; and, 3^1 Consent to the execution of an Assignment and Assumption Agreement relating to the Disposition and Development Agreement relating to the subject property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The proposed La Quinta Retirement Community is located within the Centre Pointe commercial development. The two-phase development consists of a 123,000 square foot congregate care facility and four independent living duplex cottage units (total 8 units) in the first phase, and a 77,000 square foot assisted living facility/memory care facility in the second phase. The Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee and the Planning Commission have reviewed the proposed development and recommended City Council approval. Minimal concerns were identified with the proposed project as the applicant has provided sufficient operational data and site/architectural enhancements to alleviate much of the staff's concern. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The La Quinta Retirement Community would consist of independent living apartment units facility, duplex cottage units, an assisted living facility, and a memory care facility. This development would be located on a 9.5 acre parcel in the Centre Point development. The main building, the three-story Retirement Residence, consists of studio, one -bedroom, and two -bedroom units 0 32 suites; 146 beds). The four single - story Duplex Cottage units (total of 8 units) are approximately 2,600 square feet each (master bedroom and guest bedroom/den). The two-story Assisted Living Facility includes studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom units (72 suites; 73 beds), and the Memory Care Unit includes private and semi -private suites (17 suites; 32 beds). Detailed information regarding the proposed project can be found in the Site Development Permit packet, Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee staff report, and Planning Commission staff report that are attached for reference (Attachment 1, Attachment 2, Attachment 3). Multiple approvals are required to facilitate this development, which are as follows: • Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program • General Plan Amendment/Zone Change 392 o Increase density from Medium Density Residential (8 du/acre) to Medium High Density Residential (12 du/acre) • Specific Plan Amendment o Amend existing specific plan to be consistent with proposed land use o Propose multiple deviations to development standards • Tentative Parcel Map o Subdivide property into parcels consistent with project financing plan • Site Development Permit o Covers proposed retirement community • Development Agreement Amendment o Amends existing agreement to be consistent with proposed development In addition, the provisions in the original Development Agreement and in the Disposition and Development Agreement, that covers this site, would be assumed by the applicant. If this project is approved both the City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta to the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council will be requested to consent to the assignment of rights and obligations for this 9.5-acre property. The Disposition and Development Agreement and the Assignment and Assumption Agreement are included for review in the Successor Agency's packet as part of their associated staff reports. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change: The project site is currently zoned Medium Density Residential, which permits a density of up to 8 du/acre. The purpose of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is to bring the La Quinta General Plan and Zoning land use designations of the project site into consistency with the proposed density of 10 du/acre. The proposed land use designation, Medium High Density Residential with a maximum density of 12 du/acre, is required (Attachment 4). Specific Plan Amendment: The subject property is located within the Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan, which must be amended in order to accommodate this development (Attachment 5). This action is the third amendment to the Centre Pointe Specific Plan, and includes detailed development principles and design guidelines consistent with the proposed development, including a number of deviations from La Quinta Municipal Code standards. A summary of these deviations is identified in the following table: to 390, I t it �: Lentr�Palnte i AlafiufnwMPrtl'plpatC + r � s,.m dv�lapm�.�'�katularA ry� r 1A�1reIgRMOn`t,Stati+yatU '. s: N�7dmuni 5tl t�MV ' f ( 40 feet (i lI is 28 feet 28 feet •: i;,g� i �. r F ,+, MaKlinUfl�Nutgr045j. 3 2 (min. 145 feetfrom east PL) 2 Yi'Nlltimurtllil Aia r 1,100 square feet 1,200 square feet 1,400 square feet R,,� IN c Idln�{gt Covgrager 70% 60% 60% t., . ty, a ty`'� ^ �' w�r�r.gL�I hl No Standardn/a All units are within 100 feet r,r .. of the nearest guest space , ; pUPi Y P Pin6',� n XI j l' 1 Garage Space + 2 Garage Spaces + 2 Garage Spaces + u^r',,:, i ;". �i; 1 Guest Space 1 Guest Space 1 Guest Space .jlequff�dParkingsu 5.j 234spaces n/a 204spaces Although the applicant has proposed Municipal Code, staff believes that proposed development. Tentative Parcel Map: a variety of deviations from the La Quinta they are appropriate and necessary for the The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into two parcels (Attachment 6)• Parcel 1, at approximately 3.54 acres, will consist of the Assisted Living/Memory Care Facility. Parcel 2, at approximately 5.83 acres, will include the Retirement Residence and Duplex Cottage units. Site Development Permit: Site Design The overall site design is acceptable. The design of the community provides a modest transition from the existing built environment. For example, the visual impact of the three-story Retirement Residence is minimized from the existing residential neighborhood to the east. This building is set back over 180 feet from the closest single-family residences. Furthermore, the Duplex Cottage units and the segments of the Assisted Living Facility closest to the property line have minimal visual impact on the residential neighborhood due to height and landscaping buffers. The height and number of stories of the proposed cottage units and Assisted Living Facility are consistent with what would be required for single-family residential units, and the proposed landscaping buffer provides a visual break between the existing homes and the proposed buildings. The design of the vehicular access points, internal circulation, and parking areas is acceptable. Within the project, all applicable turning radii for large vehicles, 3941 loading/unloading areas, and pedestrian connectivity meet the La Quinta Municipal Code development standards. The main drive aisle for the project has a clear separation between vehicular and pedestrian paths of travel. The proposed walkways that run throughout the community are sufficient as they provide connectivity throughout the project site. Based on the parking requirements in LQMC Section 9.150.060 and the parking analysis done as part of the review process, staff has determined that the proposed parking area design and spaces provided within the La Quinta Retirement Community can adequately accommodate the proposed use. Architectural Design The Desert Contemporary architecture and site layout of the project site is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Architectural articulations enhance the buildings, and the height, mass, and scale of the buildings are appropriate for the location. Landscaping The assorted species of plants provide diversity and character, while reflecting the Desert Contemporary architectural style and providing sufficient screening and accents around the project site. The design complies with open space, shading, and screening requirements. Turf will be placed in pedestrian -oriented locations and will meet the City's water efficiency ordinance requirements. The proposed on -site lighting is consistent with the City's outdoor lighting ordinance. Parking areas will be sufficiently lit.. All lighting has been designed and located to confine light to the project boundary. Development Agreement Amendment: The subject property has an existing Development Agreement (DA), which must be amended to reflect the proposed changes to the project. The proposed amendment to the DA was prepared by the City Attorney's office and requires review and approval by the City Council. ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives for City Council consideration entail not approving the actions required to approve the La Quinta Retirement Community or to refer this project back to the Planning Commission for further consideration of specific items identified by the City Council. 395 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on January 19, 2012. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Planning Department. All applicable comments are incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. SB-18 Native American Tribal Consultation: As per SB-18 (2004) consultation requirements, information regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan was forwarded to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Staff has followed up with all Tribes requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for monitoring in the Conditions of Approval. Neighborhood Meeting: On July 11, 2012, the applicant presented their proposal at a neighborhood meeting. Notices for the informational meeting were sent out to properties within 500 feet of the project site. Approximately ten people showed up at the meeting. Discussions related to the proposed project primarily focused on the proposed building heights and locations, landscape buffering, and on -going dust control problems. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be distributed at the City Council meeting. COMMISSIONS/BOARD/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee: On September 13, 2012, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee reviewed these site, architectural, and landscaping plans, and unanimously recommended to Planning Commission approval of the site development permit (Attachment 7). 390 Planning Commission: On September 25, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project, and unanimously recommended City Council approval of all applications for the La Quinta Retirement Community (Attachment 8). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2011- 617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director is recommending that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program bA adopted. submitted, Planning Director Attachments: 1. La Quinta Retirement Community Site Development Permit Packet (Council Only) 2. Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Staff Report 3. Planning Commission Staff Report 4. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change exhibit 5. Centre Pointe Specific Plan Amendment 3 6. Tentative Parcel Map 36405 7. Minutes of September 13, 2012 ALRC meeting 8. Minutes of September 25, 2012 PC meeting 397 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011-617 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16" day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC to adopt Environmental Assessment 2011-617, prepared for Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 3, General Plan Amendment 201 1-123, Zone Change 201 1-140, Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3, Tentative Parcel Map 36405, Site Development Permit 2011-921, known as the La Quinta Retirement Community, a 9.5-acre retirement community, generally located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25th day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Environmental Assessment, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-019, recommending to the City Council adoption of Environmental Assessment 201 1-617; and, WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that the Planning Director has conducted an Initial Study (Environmental Assessment 2011-617) and has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated (Exhibit A). Therefore, the Planning Director is recommending that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted; and, 398 City Council Resolution 2012- Environmental Assessment 2011-617 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that implementation of the project could result in a number of significant effects on the environment and identified mitigation measures that would reduce the significant effects to a less -than -significant level; and, WHEREAS, in connection with the approval of a project involving the preparation of an initial study/mitigated negative declaration that identifies one or more significant environmental effects, CEQA requires the decision -making body of the lead agency to incorporate feasible mitigation measures that would reduce those significant environmental effects to a less -than -significant level; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department mailed and published a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21092 on the 28`h day of August, 2012 to the Riverside County Clerk; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify adoption of said Environmental Assessment: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared and processed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's implementation procedures. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Environmental Assessment, and finds that it adequately describes and addresses the environmental effects of the project. Based upon the Initial Study, the comments received thereon, and the entire record of proceeding for this project, the City Council finds that there are no significant environmental effects resulting from this project as conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures. 399 City Council Resolution 2012- Environmental Assessment 2011-617 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 2. As conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that no significant impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2011-617. 3. As conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, the project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat. of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of, rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history, or prehistory. 4. There is no evidence before the City that the project, as conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 5. As conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, the project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as no significant effects on environmental factors have been identified under Environmental Assessment 2011-617. 6. As conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, the project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the City will not be significantly affected by the project. 7. As conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, the project will not create environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly, as no significant impacts have been identified which would affect human health, risk potential or public services. S. The City Council has fully considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program and any comments received thereon, and there is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project, as conditioned and subject to the 4'.� 0 City Council Resolution 2012- Environmental Assessment 2011.617 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 recommended mitigation measures, may have a significant effect on the environment. 9. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2011-617 and said assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 10. The City has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). 11. Based upon the Initial Study and the entire record of proceedings, the project, as conditioned and subject to the recommended mitigation measures, has no potential for adverse effects on wildlife as that term is defined in Fish and Game Code §711.2. 12. The location of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council decision is based upon, are located in the La Quinta City Hall, Planning Department, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That Environmental Assessment 2011-617 reflects the independent judgment of the City. 3. That it does hereby adopt Environmental Assessment 2011-617, which includes a mitigated negative declaration and associated mitigation monitoring program for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the Environmental Assessment Checklist, attached and on file in the Planning Department. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16' day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: 4:)1 City Council Resolution 2012- Envlronmental Assessment 2011-617 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 5 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California Y i � EXHIBIT A 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. California Environmental Quality Act Initial Study (as required by Sec. 15063 of the Public Resources Code) To be completed by the lead agency Project Title: La Quinta Retirement Community EA 2011-617 Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project Location: Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Existing General Plan Designation: Proposed General Plan Designation: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Jay Wuu, Associate Planner 760-777-7125 Seeley Drive, east of Washington Street, south of Miles Avenue Assessor's Parcel Number 604-630-027 Lenity Group, LLC 471 High Street, Suite 10 Salem, OR 97301 Medium Density Residential (8 du/acre) Medium High Density Residential (12 du/acre) Medium Density Residential Medium High Density Residential 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) The proposed La Quinta Retirement Community is an approximately 111,000 square foot retirement community located on an approximately 9.5-acre vacant parcel within the Centre Pointe commercial development in the City of La Quinta. The proposed community consists of a three-story, 132-suite retirement facility, four independent living duplex cottage units, a two-story, 72-suite assisted living facility, and a one-story, 32-bed memory care facility. Two development phases are proposed; the first phase includes the retirement facility and duplex units, along with parking and landscaping, and the second phase includes the assisted living and memory care facility. Access into and out of the proposed community is off of Seeley Drive. A restricted fire department access is also located along Seeley Drive. Multiple applications have been filed for the proposed project, including a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit. .1t 4 3 9. 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Parks & Recreation (P) Existing community park South: Office Commercial (0) Vacant, un-entitled land East: Low Density Residential (LDR) Existing residential community West: Office Commercial (0) Existing medical health center Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Coachella Valley Water District 4n4 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Jay Wuu, Associate Planner City of La Quinta Printed name For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, `Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. -4- 4-s 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance 4 �, I&M Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (La Quinta General Plan Exhibit 3.6 "Image Corridors", Project X Cross Section Exhibit) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic X buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and X its surroundings? (Aerial Photograph) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X (Application materials) a) The proposed project site currently has scenic views of the distant San Jacinto Mountains to the west, Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest, and limited views of the Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north and the Indio hills to the northeast. The project site is in an urbanized area and immediate views surrounding the property include an existing residential neighborhood, multiple commercial buildings, and community recreational facilities. There are no Image Corridors adjacent to the project site, as defined by the General Plan. Westward views from the existing single family residential community located immediately east of the project site could be reduced by construction of two and three story buildings. These buildings could reduce the view of the foothills to the west, but would be expected to maintain the views of the peaks above structures. The location of the proposed three story building, over 180-feet away from the nearest existing residential home to the east, as well as the incorporation of a flat roof design, will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. b) No scenic highways exist near the proposed project. The project site is currently a vacant parcel. There are no historic buildings or significant stands of trees or rock outcroppings on the site. Therefore, there will be no impact to scenic resources as a result of the proposed project. c) The project site is located in an urbanized area in the northern portion of La Quinta. Existing surrounding uses include a hotel, medical facility, a single family residential neighborhood, and a public park. The development of the project is consistent with the character of the area, as the mass and scale of the proposed project will be compatible with existing uses. The proposed project will therefore have no impact on the visual character of the area. d) The construction of the proposed project will cause an increase in light generation, primarily from car headlights and landscape lighting. The City regulates lighting levels and does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Furthermore, the type and quantity of lighting used for the community, which primarily consist of low wattage landscape lighting, wall -mounted fixtures, and parking lot lighting, is generally limited, and of low intensity. Impacts will not be significant. . Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the X California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (Riverside County Important Farmland 2008, CA Department of Conservation) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map, Riverside X County Williamson Act Lands 2007, CA Department of Conservation) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X (General Plan Land Use Map; Site Inspection) a) - c) The proposed project is located in an urbanized area of the City. There are no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) resources, no Williamson Act contracts, nor any land zoned for agricultural use, within the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, this project will have no impact on such lands. -7- Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact, Mitigation Impact Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA a X Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation X (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which X exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2003 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X (Project Description, Aerial Photo) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Project X Description, Aerial Photo) f) Generate greenhouse gas emissions either directly or indirectly, that may X have a significant impact on the environment? (Project description) g) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of X greenhouse gases? (Project description) a) The subject property is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring criteria air pollutant concentrations and establishing management policies for the SSAB. All development within the Salton Sea Air Basin, including the proposed project, is subject to the 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (2007 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM,o State Implementation Plan (2003 CVPMJO SIP). -8- 11 410 The AQMP is a comprehensive plan that establishes control strategies and guidance on regional emission reductions for air pollutants that are based, in part, by the land use plans of the subject jurisdiction. The proposed project is consistent with the City of La Quinta's land use designations and is therefore consistent with the AQMP. b) & c) Construction and operation of the La Quinta Retirement Community will result in the direct and indirect generation and emission of air pollutants both locally and regionally. Criteria air emissions and greenhouse gas emissions from construction activities will be temporary, whereas air emissions from daily operation .of the project site will be ongoing for the life of the project. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) was used to project air quality emissions that will be generated by construction and operation of the proposed project. Construction and operational emissions are described individually below. Construction Emissions As discussed above, construction activities result in the emission of air quality pollutants from site preparation, grading, building construction, and off gassing from paving and architectural coating. The site is currently vacant and does not contain pre- existing structures or facilities. Criteria pollutant emissions from construction activities are short term, and will end once construction is complete. Construction of the project will occur in two sequential phases. Phase I will result in construction of the independent living portion of the project to be located on the northeastern portion of the site (approximately 5.86 acres) with an estimated completion date of 2014. Phase II of construction will result in total build out of the project (2017) with development of the assisted living and care center located on the remaining 3.59 acres. The table below shows the average daily emissions of criteria pollutants throughout the entire construction period. The table provides unmitigated emission factors for both Phase I and Phase 11 of construction. Implementation of mitigation measures such as soil stabilization techniques, minimizing speed limits on unpaved roads, use of emission reducing filters, oxidation catalysts, and use of low volatile organic compound paint will further reduce emissions, although it is projected that no thresholds will be exceeded. Additionally, a dust control plan in conformance with SCAQMD Rule 403 will be required. As shown below, emission levels for all criteria pollutants are below established SCAQMD thresholds. -9- 411 Table 1 Construction Emissions for the Proposed Project CO NOx ROG sox PM10 PM25 PHASE I: 2012-2014 2012 50.42 86.76 10.78 0.08 24.54 14.27 2013 62.39 75.61 12.74 0.10 7.83 5.46 2014 41.89 41.42 72.34 0.07 5.05 2.51 SCAQMD Threshold 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds Threshold No No No Nn N. iv.. zuis) 42.SU 70.93 9.09 0.08 23.00 13.26 2016 47.40 51.06 8.41 0.08 9.93 5.35 2017 31.70 28.84 52.30 0.06 3.05 1.66 SCAQMD Threshold 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds Threshold No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod. Values shown represent the average values of summer and winter. See Appendix A and B for detailed tables. Operational Emissions Air quality emissions from operation of the proposed project result from area sources, energy sources and mobile sources. As previously stated, construction of the project will occur in two sequential phases. For analysis purposes it is assumed that operation of the Phase I facility begins 2014, and Phase II in 2017. Because Phase I will be in operation upon the completion of Phase II, operational emissions for Phase II reflect operational emissions of both Phases which represents operation at ultimate project build out. Therefore, build out operational emissions are the combined total of Phase I and Phase IL Table 2 Operational Emissions for the Proposed Project (pounds per day) CO NOx ROG Sox PM10 PM2.5 PHASE I: 2014 Area Source 11.98 0.14 5.11 0.00 0.06 0.06 Energy Sources 0.24 0.56 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.05 Mobile Sources 73.74 41.49 9.14 0.10 11.29 1.43 SubTotal Phase I 85.96 42.19 14.32 0.10 11.40 1.54 PHASE II: 2017 Area Source 7.51 0.09 2.80 0.00 0.04 0.04 Energy Sources 0.15 0.34 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.03 Mobile Sources 13.86 7.80 1.76 0.02 2.54 0.26 Combined Total 107.48 50.42 18.92 0.12 14.01 1.87 SCAQMD Threshold 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds Threshold No No No No No No source: camnmoa version zU i i. i. s. see Appendx A ana is ror aetattea taoles. value shown represents the average emissions from summer and winter. As shown in the table, operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants. The data reflects unmitigated operations, and implementation of mitigation measures is only suggested to further reduce pollutant 10- 412 emissions. These include, but are not be limited to the use of energy -efficient appliances and alternative modes of transportation within the project (walking, bicycles and golf carts). Non -Attainment Historically, the Coachella Valley, which includes the proposed project site, has been classified as a "non -attainment" area for PM10. In order to achieve attainment in the region, the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 Management Plan was adopted, which established strict standards for dust management for development proposals. The region is currently designated as a "serious" non-attaimnent area by the EPA, and federal re - designation for PM10 is pending. The region is also categorized as a non -attainment area for ozone by the EPA; however, this designation was upgraded from "serious" to "severe-15" in May 2010. The proposed project will contribute to an incremental increase in regional ozone and PM10 emissions. However, this impact is not expected to be cumulatively considerable. Project construction and operation emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PMio or ozone precursors, and appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented that will further reduce emissions. The project will not conflict with any attainment plans and will result in less than significant impacts. d) The nearest sensitive receptors to the subject property are within 25-50 feet and include single-family homes immediately east of the site, and a community park immediately north. However, as shown in Tables 1 and 2 above, both construction and operational air pollutant emissions will be below SCAQMD thresholds. The project will generate pollutants associated with household activities and vehicle use, and is not expected to increase the amount of noxious odors to the area. Therefore air quality impacts on sensitive receptors, related to criteria air pollutants and odors, will be less than significant. e) The project will result in the development of 221 retirement and assisted living residential units, and is not expected to create objectionable odors. f) & g) The proposed project will generate greenhouse gas emissions both during the construction phase and during operation at build out. Based on the CalEEMod model, construction emissions will generate approximately 2,723.09 metric tons of CO2 over the construction period of 5 years. Construction related greenhouse gas production will be temporary and will end once the project is completed. Table 5 provides GHG emissions for Phase I and Phase II of construction. -tt- 1413 Table 3 GHG Emissions from Construction of the Proposed Project (metric tons) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Construction Activities: Phase I 2012-2014 1,475.78 0.14 0.00 1,478.81 Construction Activities: Phase II 1,242.16 0.10 0.00 1,244.28 2015-2017 Total 2717.94 0.24 0.00 2,723.09 See Appendix A and B for detailed tables. Values shown represent the total GHG emission projections for construction of the proposed project. Operation of the proposed project will create on -going greenhouse gases through the consumption of electricity and natural gas, moving sources, and the transport and pumping of water for domestic use. Table 4 describes annual (unmitigated) operational GHG generation. Table 3 GHG Emissions from Operation (metric tons/vear) Emission Unmitigated CO2 Source Equivalent Phase I Area 1.76 Energy 292.58 Mobile 1,774.87 Waste 35.21 Water 62.46 Combined Phase I and II Area 2.87 Energy 474.57 Mobile 2,181.01 Waste 72.15 Water 101.59 See Appendix A for CalEEMod output tables. Values shown represent the annual GHG emission projections for operation of the proposed project. As shown in Table 4, operation of the proposed project will generate approximately 2,832 tons of CO2e equivalent annually. Various statewide measures and programs have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions, including new fuel -efficient standards for cars, and increasing renewable energy sources. There are currently no thresholds for greenhouse gases established for individual development projects. The proposed project will be required to abide by statewide measures for reducing greenhouse gases, such as the CalGreen Building Code, which includes energy efficiency standards which are more stringent than previous codes. The proposed project Will also be required to comply with the City's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. This Plan includes a range of reduction measures designed to meet or exceed State mandated reductions in GHG emissions. As a result of these requirements, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions. -12- 414 Mitigation Measures 1. Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper working order and equipped with oxidation catalysts and filters to limit criteria pollutants. 2. Construction activities will be phased, as appropriate, to reduce the simultaneous operation of multiple pieces of construction equipment. 3. To reduce fugitive dust emissions, the applicant shall prepare a dust control plan in conformance with SCAQMD Rule 403, which may include the following: • apply water and/or chemical stabilizers to exposed and disturbed soil areas • cease all construction grading and earth -moving operations when winds exceed 25 miles per hour • spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads, and parking areas • use street sweeper to clean paved roads adjacent to site • reduce vehicle speeds on unpaved roads • wash off trucks before they leave the construction site • cover import/export soils transported to/from construction site 4. Low -emitting architectural coatings and products shall be used in conformance with SCAQMD Rule 1113. 13� Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, X or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (General Plan MEA, p. 78 ff.) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the x California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (General Plan MEA, p. 78 ff.) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct X removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (General Plan MEA, p. 78 ff.) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? .(General Plan MEA, p. 78 ff.) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, X such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 f;.) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or X other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (General Plan MEA, p. 78 ff.) -14- 416 a) — f) The project site is located in a highly urbanized area, and has been significantly impacted by roadway development and existing surrounding development. The site is sparsely vegetated, and isolated, and does not provide significant habitat. The project site is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan boundary, but is not located in or adjacent to a conservation area. It is located in the fee area, however, and development of the site will require payment of the mitigation fee in place at the time that development occurs. This fee is designed to mitigate impacts to locally sensitive species by allowing the purchase of conservation lands in sensitive habitat areas. Therefore, no impacts associated with biological resources are expected to result from implementation of the proposed project. Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as X defined in ' 15064.5? (General Plan MEA) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? X (Archaeological Monitoring Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site, July 2001) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique X geologic feature? (General Plan MEA) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Archaeological Monitoring X Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site, July, 2001) a) The proposed project site is currently vacant land. The previous archaeological monitoring program concluded that previous soil removal operations in the project area had No Effect on any historical resources, and that no further historical/archaeological investigations will be necessary. Therefore, the construction of the proposed project will have no impact on historic resources. t "Archaeological Monitoring Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site," prepared by CRM Tech, July, 2001. "Final Report on Archaeological Mitigation of Project Effects to Native American Cremation Found on Parcel Map No. 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, February, 2001. . q 4 ?. 7 -15- b) & d) Several cultural resource studies were completed for the subject project site 2. The surveys included extensive testing and the excavation of a cremation site. A small number of remains and artifacts were recovered. The work done on the site to date has been comprehensive, but additional resources may be buried within the project area. As a result, to ensure that the potential impacts to cultural resources are mitigated, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present on site during any earth moving activities. Should the monitor identify a resource, he/she shall be empowered to stop or redirect earth moving activities until such time as the resource can be properly identified and processed. The archaeological monitor shall be required to prepare a report at the end of earth moving activities and file such report with the Planning Department within 30 days of completion of monitoring activities for any building on the project site. c) The project site is located outside the boundary of ancient Lake Cahuilla, which is the only locality in the City where potentially significant paleontological resources have been identified. The soils on the vacant acreage are dune sands, which have been deposited on the land in relatively recent times, as a result of Aeolian transport. These soils are not suitable for paleontological resources. Therefore, there will be no impact to paleontological resources as a result of implementation of the proposed project. "Final Report Archaeological testing and Site Evaluation on Parcel Map 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, June, 2000. "Phase I Archaeological Assessment of 54.65 Acres at the Southeast Comer of Washington Street and Miles Avenue," prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, June, 1999. Z "Archaeological Monitoring Report, Miles Avenue Borrow Site," prepared by CRM Tech, July, 2001. "Final Report on Archaeological Mitigation of Project Effects to Native American Cremation Found on Parcel Map No. 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, February, 2001. "Final Report Archaeological testing and Site Evaluation on Parcel Map 26860," prepared by CRM Tech, June, 2000. "Phase I Archaeological Assessment of 54.65 Acres at the Southeast Comer of Washington Street and Miles Avenue," prepared by Archaeological Advisory Group, June, 1999. -16 418 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area X or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (General Plan MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X (General Plan MEA Exhibit 6.2) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (General Plan X MEA Exhibit 6.3) iv) Landslides? (General Plan MEA X Exhibit 6.4) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (General Plan MEA X Exhibit 6.5) c) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating X substantial risks to life or property (General Plan MEA) d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems X where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Project description) a) i. The proposed project is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The site is located approximately 4 miles south of the San Andreas Fault Zone. There will be no impacts associated with fault rupture on the project site. a) ii. The proposed project site is located in a Seismic Zone IV, as defined by the Building Code. As a result, the City implements specially designed building standards which require the reinforcement of structures to withstand strong earthquakes. These '� It 419 standards will be applied to the proposed project, and will assure that impacts associated with ground -shaking are reduced to less than significant levels. a) iii. The project area is not located in an area subject to liquefaction. When the new proposed retirement community submits for grading and building permits, the City will require the submittal of site -specific geotechnical analysis. This analysis will further analyze site soils to assure that foundation design is adequate to support the structures, based on the site -specific conditions. Therefore, impacts associated with liquefaction are expected to be less than significant. a) iv. The proposed project occurs in the northern portion of the City, in an area far removed from the foothills of surrounding mountains. No manufactured hillsides occur in the area. There will be no impact associated with landslides. b) The project area is susceptible to high winds that can cause wind erosion and accumulation. The project will be required to implement a dust control and management plan as part of the grading permit process, which will reduce impacts associated with blowing dust and sand. Once completed, the project will include impervious surfaces and landscaped areas which will stabilize soils. The impacts associated with soil erosion and loss of topsoil will be less than significant. c) The Aeolian soils found on the site are categorized as having a "very low" expansion potential in Table 18-1-B of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. There will be no impacts associated with expansive soils as a result of project implementation. d) The proposed project occurs in an urbanized area of the City where sanitary sewer service is available. As the City will require that the project connect to existing sewer systems, there will be no impacts associated with septic systems. 18- 420 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the roject: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of X hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of X hazardous materials into the environment? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter X mile of an existing or proposed school? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) d) Be located on, a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it X create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) e) For a project located within an airport land use, plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) i) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or X working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency X response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General Plan MEA p. 95 ff) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death X involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Wildfire Susceptibility, Riverside County RCIP) a) — h) The proposed project will consist of a senior living community, and is not expected to store, use or transport significant hazardous materials, beyond those used for janitorial purposes. In the assisted living and memory care section of the facility, requirements imposed by the State of California and County of Riverside for health care facilities will be implemented if required. Impacts associated with hazardous materials are expected to be insignificant as the project is not located within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, and not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project site is located on the Valley floor, and is in a highly urbanized area; there will be no impacts associated with wildland fires. Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (General X Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- X existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan FIR p. III-87 ff.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a X stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the X rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-87 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or X provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (General Plan EIR p. III- 87 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation X map? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or X redirect flood flows? (Master -21- „ 423 Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) 1 1 1 1 1 a) — b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The development of the site will result in the need for domestic water service. The CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate growth in its service area. The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The project proponent will be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction provisions, including requirements for water efficient fixtures, and a low- to moderate -water use plant palette, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the community. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. c)_ d) The project site is located near the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel, a regional flood control facility managed by CVWD. The City will allow discharge of storm flows into the Channel, with approval from CVWD, without retention on the site. The project proponent is proposing to implement such a direct discharge on the project site. CVWD has standards and requirements for such discharge to assure that waters are not polluted when they enter the channel, and the project complies with utilization of a settling basin and dry well. These standards will be implemented for the proposed project, assuring that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. e) — g) The site is not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. -22- 1 424 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Aerial photo; project X description) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, X or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Exhibit 2.1) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? General Plan MEA p.. X 74f.) a) - b) The proposed project will include 124 retirement residences, 72 assisted living residences, and a 32-bed memory care facility on 9.5 gross acres. The units will be built to conform to the Medium High Density Residential zoning requirements, and the proposed density is consistent with the proposed zone. The surrounding area includes a community park, low density residential, a medical center, 129-suite hotel, and restaurant. The project site is currently vacant, and therefore will not divide an existing community. The project's conformance to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will eliminate any potential impact with any applicable land use policy, plan or regulation. The project site is located approximately 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport. The project site falls within Zone E of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Policy Document, which considers residential development below 100 feet in height a compatible use. A less than significant impact is expected. c) The project site is within the boundary of the CVMSHCP, but is not within a conservation area. The proposed project will be required to pay fees in conformance with the CVMSHCP to assure consistency with the Plan. There will be no conflict with the Plan. -23 4^� Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental X Assessment p. 71 ff., Special Report 198, CA Geological Survey) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land x use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff., Special Report 198, CA Geological Survey a) & b) The proposed project site is located in Mineral Resource Zone MRZ-1, which indicates that no resources occur. There will be no impact to mineral resources as a result of the proposed project. _24_ 426 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards X of other agencies? (General Plan MEA p. 111 ff) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or X groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. I I I ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project X vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. I I I ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without the project? (General Plan MEA P. I I I ff.) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. I I I ff.) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project X area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. 11 I ff.) a), b), & d) The proposed project includes the development of retirement, assisted living, and memory care units. Units that face Seeley Drive, Miles Avenue, and Washington Street beyond, may experience elevated noise levels associated with traffic; however proper noise attenuation measures, such as use of double pane windows, HVAC/PTAC units, and proper insulation, will provide for reduced noise levels. To determine which methods are necessary, the City requires the preparation of design -specific noise analysis, which is submitted with building plans. This analysis will include recommendations for construction of the units to assure that interior noise levels do not exceed City standards. Therefore, exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 25- 427 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance will be less than significant. Construction activity may increase ambient noise levels in the vicinity, including those caused by groundborne noise and vibration. Nearby residents may experience short periods of elevated noise levels, but these will occur during the less sensitive daytime hours, and will be temporary and periodic. Construction noise will be regulated by the La Quinta Municipal Code, which restricts construction activity to daytime hours. With the imposition of the City's construction noise standards, impacts are expected to be less than significant. c) The proposed residential project will cause a slight increase in noise levels associated with the running of HVAC/PTAC units, traffic entering and leaving the site, and noises associated with residential living, which will likely marginally increase permanent ambient noise levels above existing conditions without the project. The project site is located in an urbanized area, however, and ambient noise levels associated with the project are expected to be similar to those experienced in surrounding residential developments. Therefore, permanent increases in ambient noise levels are expected to be less than significant. e)-f) The project site is located approximately 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport. The project site does not fall within any elevated noise contour areas. Therefore, there will be no impact associated with airport noise. 26 42� Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through X extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing X elsewhere? (Application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X (Application materials) a) - c) The population increase resulting from the additional residents of the proposed community is minimal, and the project will provide a beneficial impact to the community by providing senior housing. The project is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designations, and therefore has been calculated and accounted for as part of the build out population. The project is proposed in an already urbanized area, and no additional infrastructure improvements that have the potential to induce growth, such as expanded roads, are needed for the proposed project. Therefore, the project will have no impact in regards to inducing substantial populations. The site is currently vacant, and development will displace no one. -27- 4?9 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA) X Schools? (General Plan MEA) X Parks? (General Plan MEA) X Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA) X a) Buildout of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract to the City. Buildout of the proposed project will generate property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The community will primarily be occupied by senior citizens. Senior housing projects do not generate a demand for schools. Therefore, the project will be exempt from the payment of school fees, and will have no impact on schools. The project will be required to pay the City's park fees for development of off -site park facilities. The proposed community will generate a marginal need for parks. However, the project includes recreational facilities, in the form of community common areas, pool area, walking paths, and other recreational amenities, which will address the majority of the needs of the residents. In addition, the City implements Quimby Act requirements, which will require the payment of lieu fees for the purchase of park lands. The added population will not significantly impact existing City parks. -28- 430 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the X facility would occur or be accelerated? (Project Description) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which X might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Project Description) a) & b) The addition of the retirement community will increase the City's population. These residents will increase the demand for the City's existing recreational facilities marginally. The proposed project, however, will include on -site recreational facilities, which will offset this demand, and will also contribute park fees for off -site park development. Thus, impacts associated with recreational facilities are expected to be less than significant. 29- 431 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle X trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (Centre Pointe Updated Trip Generation & Travel Analysis, September 27, 2011) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads X or highways? (Centre Pointe Updated Trip Generation & Travel Analysis, September 27, 2011), c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that X results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible X uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Project description) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (Project description) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, , or programs supporting alternative X transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) a) - b) The City's Public Works Department analyzed the project's potential impacts on surrounding roadways, as required by the City's traffic impact analysis policies, and had no comment. The Updated Trip Generation & Travel Analysis Review' submitted by the applicant concluded an increase of 32 trips per day from the previously -approved traffic impact analysis for the Centre Pointe commercial development 2. The previous study found that all surrounding streets would operate at an acceptable Level of Service, and an increase resulting from this proposed project would not significantly affect these levels. Therefore, the addition of the proposed project will have a less than significant impact roadway capacity or level of service. -30- 432 c) The project is located 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport. The proposed project will have no impact on the airport, or on air traffic patterns at the airport. d) The proposed project will be accessed from an existing street, Seeley Drive. All interior driveways and ingress/egress roads will be designed to meet City sight standards, and provide safe access onto to Seeley Drive. No design hazards will be created by the proposed project. e) Emergency access to the project will occur from two points on Seeley Drive. Implementation of the proposed project will have no impact on emergency access. f) SunLine Transit Agency operates bus service along Miles Avenue, located north of the project site. No change in service is expected, so the new residents will continue to have access to transit services in close proximity to the project site. The proposed project will have no impact on alternative transportation. Centre Pointe Updated Trip Generation & Travel Analysis, September 27, 2011 Centre Pointe Updated Trip Generation & Travel Analysis, January 20, 2003 433 -31- Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General X Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could X cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or X are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's X projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) i) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the X project's solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid X waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) a), b), d), e) The proposed project will have no impact on wastewater treatment requirements. The retirement community will marginally increase the demand on wastewater treatment -32- 434 facilities. However, CVWD has capacity at its plants, and operates within the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No impact is expected. The proposed project adjoins to existing water and wastewater lines. The addition of the proposed community will not significantly increase the demand for water or wastewater treatment, and CVWD has indicated in its management plan documents that it has water available to serve the build out needs of the City. There will be no need for additional facilities. c) The City will allow discharge of storm flows into the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel, with approval from CVWD, without retention on the site. The project proponent is proposing to implement such a direct discharge on the project site. CVWD has standards and requirements for such discharge to assure that waters are not polluted when they enter the channel. These standards will be implemented for the proposed project, assuring that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Also please see Hydrology section, above. f) & g) The City contracts for solid waste disposal with Burrtec, a private contractor. Burrtec transports solid waste generated throughout the City to a transfer station on Edom Hill, west of the City. From that point, solid waste is transported to the Lambs Canyon Landfill. This landfill has capacity to serve the proposed project, and three additional landfills are available to accommodate solid waste in the future. Burrtec is required to comply with all regulations regarding the proper disposal of solid waste. This includes the disposal of household hazardous waste, which is handled through community events, or through the ABOP facility located in Palm Springs. The development of the retirement community will only marginally increase the waste stream. The project will include recycling facilities and programs to assure that the amount of solid waste transferred to local landfills is minimized. No impact is expected. 33- 43� Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant w/ Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a X plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage X of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when X viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental effects .which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either X directly or indirectly? a) The site has the potential to impact cultural resources. The mitigation measures included in this Initial Study, however, will reduce these potential impacts to less than significant levels. Development of the proposed project will occur on a site that has previously been partially developed and that does not provide significant native habitat. The City is a "Permittee" of the Coachella Valley MSHCP, and therefore requires new development to pay mitigation impact fees used to protect and conserve important species and habitat throughout the Valley. The project will be required to pay mitigation fees in conformance with the MSHCP. Impacts related to wildlife habitat and species are expected to be less than significant. b) The proposed project will provide a variety of housing types for City residents, meeting the City's short and long-term General Plan goals and policies. The project will be developed in an urbanized area, as well as on a site that already has been disturbed, and -34- 436 will take advantage of existing infrastructure. Therefore, there will be no impact in regards to meeting short-term at the expense of long-term goals. c) The project will have minimal cumulative impacts on environmental resources. The project will have minimal impacts on air quality, hazards, utilities and public services, however these were found to be less than significant. d) Human beings will not be significantly impacted by the proposed project. The City will impose standard requirements for dust management plans, noise and geotechnical studies for the construction of the project. These studies, and their recommendations, in addition to mitigation measures, will assure that impacts to human beings are less than significant. 3s- 437 XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES.. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. General Plan EIR, 2002. Environmental Assessment 2001-436 b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. 36- 438 1+4 j \ 2k o& . }/ j §� \ b§ 2 \§\ k \ (k wa / 22(k= kd-)\ 2E@�� j/ �/e \ \222ko g �\)\»d }(/��C 4=um)7j2 5K k 2� /\ 7\ 4%l W F a A zm aA U w OV a w 3 .0 F a U � U F 5 'v 5E en .5 L a �z � r z� a0 z� 3 0 'yOyaa F F 5 a 'a u 6D o e'a oo.$ a 5 ae ° o $ ° o och N o C7 5 " � � � v a � 3 � v ° v • v v � '�-' � «' 5 u K � aw°i aKi vdvV° dE'"r a'K :^ A.d3 •S m N 'ocr ,, rl d .G d o o a .0 y .5 o � « O N �.. � U U � ;� �j- N '� .Q F t�tl � y U m F U N 0. ° 3 ° ° u h d y 3° 7° °w ° 3 5 °� o "' y o ° o 0 V 5aaw Uaoc° - a.53 aan 440 W F d a a �U w OV Y N ii W N •� �y T c> iv o-Fi v m 0 o N� .5 0 en .5 L a oz ma z� a o En ca a N �. to m O y U m N O 00 U D T —.ars �A N 0 U c v a t OA Y LY d ��11 p O „ = 5 .5 00 U U A N O > 0 O y [��]/ (Fy P. iC T F C E O N �.'i L d .d 2 �n ✓� L45 to 0 .L 0-0 pQ� = 'o co o .5 .r3 ttl `�'! ttl O N s N 1 �I�.II re o .y .Y N P b❑ O �« 'd U /d� to L fC 1..1 ❑ Cy � O N O U � y •" � N 0 Mal CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2011-123, A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2011-123 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS,, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16" day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC to consider a General Plan Amendment for a change in land use from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential, generally located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25" day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said General Plan Amendment, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution', 2012-021, recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 201 1-123; and, WHEREAS„ the La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2011-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).. The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to this action; and, WHEREAS, per SB-18 consultation requirements, the Planning Department has forwarded information regarding the proposed amended Specific Plan to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission and has followed up with all Tribes 442 City Council Resolution 2012- General Plan Amendment 2011-123 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 2 requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for monitoring in the Conditions of Approval; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings approving said General Plan Amendment: Finding A The project is consistent with the General Plan The proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the general plan which are not being amended. The purpose of the change in land use designations is to bring the appropriate land use designations into conformance with the proposed project. Finding B Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed change will not result in a substantial change to existing recreational area, will not result in the loss of existing wildlife habitat, nor will it have an effect on the conditions of the existing surrounding neighborhood. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not result in any changed conditions and will therefore have no effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community or surrounding natural environment. Finding C The new designation is compatible with the land use designations on adjacent properties. The General Plan Amendment will bring the property into conformance with the proposed project and will have no effect on adjacent existing land uses because the 443 City Council Resolution 2012- General Plan Amendment 2011-123 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 proposed residential/congregate care use is compatible with the surrounding existing single-family residential homes, medical center, and hotel. Finding D The new land use designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. The new land use designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, in that it will allow expansion of the proposed use for residential/congregate care uses. Finding E Approval of the amendment is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing designation was imposed. Approval of the new land use designation is warranted because the density of the proposed community, 10 dwelling units per acre, requires the Medium High Density Residential land use designation, with a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 201 1-123 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16" day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 444 City Council Resolution 2012- General Plan Amendment 2011-123 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M., Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of. La Quinta, California 445 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2011-140, A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR A SINGLE PROPERTY FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: ZONE CHANGE 2011-140 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16" day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC to consider a change in zoning from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential, generally located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25`" day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Zone Change, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-022, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2011-140; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 14, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: Finding A The project is consistent with the General Plan The proposed Zone Change is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the general plan which are not being amended. The purpose of the change in land use designations is to bring the appropriate land use designations into conformance with the proposed project. 446 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2011-140 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 2 Finding B Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Approval of the proposed Zone Change will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed change will not result in a substantial change to existing recreational area, will not result in the loss of existing wildlife habitat, nor will it have an effect on the conditions of the existing surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Zone Change will not result in any changed conditions and will therefore have no effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community or surrounding natural environment. Finding C The new designation is compatible with the land use designations on adjacent properties. The Zone Change will bring the property into conformance with the proposed project and will have no effect on adjacent existing land uses because the proposed residential/congregate care use is compatible with the surrounding existing single- family homes, medical center, and hotel. Finding D The new land use designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. The new zoning designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, in that it will allow expansion of the proposed use for residential/congregate care uses. Finding E Approval of the amendment is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing designation was imposed. Approval of the new zoning designation is warranted because the density of the proposed community, 10 dwelling units per acre, requires the Medium High Density Residential zoning designation, with a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. 447 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2011.140 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 The La Quinta Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the property described as APN: 604-630-027 from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential. The properties for such rezoning are shown and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL The La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 201 1- 617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to this action. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this . Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16" day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: F-,Vd*31 NOES: ABSENT: 448 Ordinance No. Zone Change 2011-140 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 44a City of La Quinta Zone Change 2011-140 EXHIBIT'N' Change from Medium Density' Residential to Medium High Density Residential N WP. 456 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 AMENDMENT 3, FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 AMENDMENT 3 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16`h day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing_ to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC for consideration of an amendment to the existing Centre Pointe Specific Plan in order to accommodate plans for a 9.5-acre retirement community located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 251h day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Specific Plan Amendment, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-023, recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, per SB-18 consultation requirements, the Planning Department has forwarded information regarding the proposed amended Specific Plan to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission and has followed up with all Tribes requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for monitoring in the Conditions of Approval; and, WHEREAS, the La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2011-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because n51 City Council Resolution 2012- Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 2 revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to this action; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan Amendment: 1. Consistency with the General Plan The proposed Specific Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that the design, height, scale and mass of the buildings within the community are compatible with the goals and policies of the General Plan Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Land Use designation. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the proposed specific plan amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare as Environmental Assessment 2011-617 was prepared, and certification of the Environmental Assessment is in compliance with CEQA requirements. 3. Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan amendment incorporates land uses that are compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The design and density regulations specified in the Specific Plan amendment for residential and related recreational facilities are compatible with the existing single-family homes located near the specific plan area and on surrounding properties. 4. Property Suitability The uses permitted in the specific plan amendment, including age - restricted residences and common areas, are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the community is surrounded by similar existing uses such as single-family residential homes and a medical n5? City Council Resolution 2012- Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 center. The current specific plan area is served without adverse impact by all necessary public services and utilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That it does hereby approve Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16"' day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: IkkiPI*1 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) 453 City Council Resolution 2012- Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 454 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 AMENDMENT 3 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3, these conditions shall take precedence. 3. Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2011-617 Site Development Permit 2011-921 Tentative Parcel Map 36405 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Planning Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4. Within 30 days of City Council approval, applicant shall provide five copies of the Final Specific Plan document, as amended by this action, to the Planning Department. The Final Specific Plan shall include all text and graphics except as amended by this action, all amendments per this action, and correction of any typographical errors, internal document inconsistencies, and other amendments deemed necessary by the Planning Director. 455 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405, SUBDIVIDING APPROXIMATELY 9.5 ACRES INTO TWO PARCELS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16`h day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC to subdivide approximately 9.5 acres into two parcels, generally located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25" day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Tentative Parcel Map, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-024, recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map 36405; and, WHEREAS, the La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2011-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to this action; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, 456 City Council Resolution 2012- Tentative Parcel Map 36405 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 2 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did find the following facts, findings, and reasons to justify approval of said Tentative Parcel Map 36405: A. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map 36405 is consistent with the City's General Plan, with the implementation of Conditions of Approval. The project density of approximately 10 units per acre is consistent with the Medium High Density Residential land use designation of up to 12 dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. B. The design and improvements of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 36405 are consistent with the City's General Plan, to provide for adequate storm water drainage, and other infrastructure improvements with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure proper street widths, storm drainage facilities, and timing of their construction. C. The La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 201 1-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. D. The design of Tentative Parcel Map 36405 and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that this issue was considered in Environmental Assessment 201 1-617, in which no significant health or safety impacts were identified for the proposed project. E. The site of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 36405 is physically suitable for the type of development and density of the development. 457 City Council Resolution 2012- Tentative Parcel Map 36405 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 The proposed development plans for the site are congregate care and assisted living/memory care facilities; the land is level and is therefore able to accommodate such uses. F. As conditioned, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map 36405 is consistent with all applicable provisions of the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act. G. As conditioned, the design of Tentative Parcel Map 36421 will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public -at -large, for access through, or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That it does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 36405 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16`" day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 451 City Council Resolution 2012- Tentative Parcel Map 36405 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 45 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 GENERAL 1.. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Parcel Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-guinta.org. 3. This Tentative Parcel Map shall expire two years from the date of City Council approval, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of La Quinta Municipal Code 9.200.080 (Permit expiration and time extensions). 4. Tentative Parcel Map 36405 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2011-617 Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 Site Development Permit 2011-921 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Planning Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: 1 460 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Planning Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air 'Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 6. FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE: Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading, building permit, or encroachment permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7- 2008-0001 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009- 0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project 2 461 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. G. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 3 46) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 8. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 9. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 11. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 12. Prior to acceptance of the final parcel map, the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and execute an CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 "AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY" form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private drive aisles that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 15. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Entry at the Roundabout on Seeley Drive — An additional right of way dedication at the project's entry on Seeley Drive shown as Lot A on the Tentative Parcel Map No. 36405 or as approved by the City Engineer. 16. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 17. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop 5 46" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 18. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 19. The applicant shall show the following perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights -of -way as on Parcel Map 31116: A. Seeley Drive (Non -Conforming Collector) - 20-foot from the Public Right -of -Way 20. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 21. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 22. Direct vehicular access to Seeley Drive is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative parcel map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access, restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 23. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 24. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative 6 465 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 Parcel Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 9�:1��/_\►1�i1:ti\yy[Hl��il9:ii��I���il�►1�� 25. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 26. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 27. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) 1) - Seeley Drive (Non -conforming Collector, 80' ROW): No street widening of Seeley Drive is required along the frontages adjacent to the tentative parcel map boundaries. 2) Other required improvements in the Seeley Drive right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. 7 li 466 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 28. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 29. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 28 feet as shown on the Preliminary Precise Grading Plan or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 30. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil 8 iv 467 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials including the specifications . as identified in the Geotech report prepared for this project dated September 12, 2011 identifying 3.5"a.c./ 4" c.a.b. for low traffic and 5"a.c./ 4" c.a.b for high traffic. 31. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. FINAL'MAPS 33. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1 " = 40' scale. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 9 468 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 34. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 35. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Commercial Precise Grading Plan 1" = 20' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through C to be submitted concurrently. D. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical E. Off -Site Signing and Striping Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. NOTE: D through E to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) 10 46a CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. Precise Grading plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking.lot improvements and ADA requirements. 36. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction. notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 37. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 38. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as - built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said 11 _4 470 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 39. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 40. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Parcel Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 41. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 42. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 43. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or 12 471 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 44. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 45. Depending on the timing of the development of this tentative parcel map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to comply with one or more of the following as a condition to finalizing the parcel map: A. Construct certain off -site improvements required by one of the conditions of approval herein. B. Construct additional off -site improvements not identified in these conditions of approval, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements required by these conditions of approval previously constructed by others. D. Secure the costs for future improvements required by these conditions of approval that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Once development starts, Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, as a condition of obtaining approval of the Final Map, or of obtaining the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 46. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed 13 47) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1/2" x 11" Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. PRECISE GRADING 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 48. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 49. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). 14 It 473 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 50. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 51. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 52. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed 15 474 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 53. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 54. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 55. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the pad elevation by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the pad elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 56. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 57. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Centre Pointe Development and Parcel Map 31116 and as modified for this Parcel Map 36405, or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain 16 475 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. ' 59. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 60. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 61. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 62. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. 63. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 64. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 17 476 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 65. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 66. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 67. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 68. If permitted by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and the City Engineer, when an applicant proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate permit from CVWD and shall execute an indemnification instrument as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Additionally, the applicant shall pay for all costs of sampling and testing associated with the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The applicant is required to construct and provide for the maintenance in perpetuity of the required discharge treatment Best Management Practice facilities per the NPDES Permit Supplement A or as approved by the City Engineer. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative parcel map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions in the final development CC&Rs or other appropriate instrument for meeting these obligations. The 100-year storm water hydraulic grade line shall be 3 feet below the channel lining and 2 feet below the Project Storm HGL or as determined by CVWD and the City Engineer. Additionally, the applicant shall submit verification to the City of CVWD acceptance of the proposed discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, 18 , 4ll CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with the initial submittal of storm drain improvement plans. 69. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 at seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. 117-2008-001. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. 137-2008-001. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 70. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 71. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 19 478 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 72. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 73. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 74. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 75. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 76. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect in California. 77. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 78. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans to the Planning Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 21 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The 20 47a !k CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 79. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash", and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 80. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 81. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Planning Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Director and/or City Engineer. 82. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Planning Director. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public streets. 83. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" latest edition, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. PUBLIC SERVICES 84. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and as approved by the City Engineer. 21 J CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 MAINTENANCE 85. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 86. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 22 4 z31 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921, INCLUDING SITE, ARCHITECTURAL, AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16" day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Lenity Group, LLC for approval of site, architectural, and landscaping plans for the La Quinta Retirement Community, generally located on Seeley Drive, East of Washington Street, South of Miles Avenue, more particularly described as: APN: 604-630-027 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25" day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Site Development Permit, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-025, recommending to the City Council approval of Site Development Permit 201 1-921; and, WHEREAS, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 13`" day of September, 2012, hold a public meeting to review and discuss site, architectural, and landscape plans and recommended to the Planning Commission approval of Site Development Permit 2011-921, the minutes of said meeting were included in the staff report for consideration by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: lk 43 City Council Resolution 2012- Site Development Permit 2011-921 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012' Page 2 1. Consistency with the General Plan The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as it proposes a multi -use retirement community on a property which, if approved, will be General Plan -designated for MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) development. 2. Consistency with the Zoning Code The proposed structures, as conditioned, are consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and the Centre Pointe Specific Plan, in terms of architectural style, building height, building mass, and landscaping. The community is consistent with the La Quinta Zoning Map, as it proposes a multi -unit age -restricted residential community which, if approved, will be General Plan -designated for MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) development. The site development permit has been conditioned to ensure compliance with the zoning standards of the MHDR district, and other supplemental standards as established in Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and the Centre Pointe Specific Plan. 3. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2011-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. 4. Architectural Design The Desert Contemporary architecture and layout of the project site is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Because the existing buildings within the Centre Pointe development near the proposed facility are of a Modern and Mediterranean/Spanish architectural style, the Desert 433 City Council Resolution 2012- Site Development Permit 2011-921 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 3 Contemporary style does not conflict with the surrounding built environment. Enough architectural articulations enhance the buildings, and the height, mass, and scale of the buildings are appropriate for the proposed location. Furthermore, the visual impact of the three-story Retirement Residence is minimized from view from the existing residential neighborhood to the east. The building is set back over 180 feet from the closest existing residence to the east, and review of the eastern property line transition plan shows that the Duplex Cottage units and the segments of the Assisted Living Facility closest to the property line have minimal visual impact on the existing residential neighborhood due to massing, height, and landscaping buffers. 5. Site Design The site design aspects of the proposed community, as conditioned, will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, surrounding development, and with the overall design quality prevalent in the City; in terms of interior circulation, pedestrian access, and other architectural site design elements such as scale, mass, and appearance. The buildings are properly sized with regards to height and floor area, and are situated at engineer -approved locations with regards to vehicular and pedestrian access. 6. Landscape Design The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The project landscaping for the community, as conditioned, shall unify and enhance visual continuity of the community with the surrounding development. Landscape improvements are designed and sized to provide visual appeal. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to blend with the building architecture. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and ,. 434 City Council Resolution 2012- Site Development Permit 2011-921 Lenity Group, LLC October 16, 2012 Page 4 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit .201 1-921 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 161" day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ,. 435 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2011-921 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2011-617 Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 Tentative Parcel Map 36405 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Planning Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall be expire two years from the date of City Council approval, and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.210.010, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Improvement Permit) e La Quinta Planning Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) 1 4 1486 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) e State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES ONE (1) ACRE OR MORE: Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading, building permit, or encroachment permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 at seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7- 2008-0001 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009- 0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. 483 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. G. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. . 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 438 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. .Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit and , execute an "AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY" form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed 489 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA OUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private drive aisles that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 13. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights -of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 14. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Entry at the Roundabout on Seeley Drive — An additional right of way dedication at the project's entry on Seeley Drive shown as Lot A on the Tentative Parcel Map No. 36405 or as approved by the City Engineer. 15. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 16. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 17. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary 5 490 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 18. The applicant shall show the following perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights -of -way as on Parcel Map 31 1 16: A. Seeley Drive (Non -Conforming Collector) - 20-foot from the Public Right -of -Way 19. Where public facilities (e.g., ,sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes. 20. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 21. Direct vehicular access to Seeley Drive is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 22. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 23. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. 25. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust 6 491 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 26. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Seeley Drive (Non -conforming Collector, 80' ROW): No street widening of Seeley Drive is required along the frontages adjacent to the project site boundaries. 2) Other required improvements in the Seeley Drive right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping,' legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. 27. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 28. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: 49? 7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 28 feet as shown on the Preliminary Precise Grading Plan or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. t 493 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials including the specifications as identified in the Geotech report prepared for this project dated September 12, 2011 identifying 3.5"a.c./ 4" c.a.b. for low traffic and 5"a.c./ 4" c.a.b for high traffic. 30. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and .specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 32. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 33. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. 494 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 A. On -Site Commercial Precise Grading Plan 1 " = 20' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan Horizontal 1"=40' C. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through C to be submitted concurrently. D. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical E. Off -Site Signing and Striping Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. NOTE: D through E to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. ., 495 a�� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 Precise Grading plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 34. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 35. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 36. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as - built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 37. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 38. Depending on the timing of the development of this tentative parcel map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be 490 11 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 required to comply with one or more of the following as a condition to finalizing the parcel map: A. Construct certain off -site improvements required by one of the conditions of approval herein. B. Construct additional off -site improvements not identified in these conditions of approval, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements required by these conditions of approval previously constructed by others. D. Secure the costs for future improvements required by these conditions of approval that are to be made by others. E.. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Once development starts, Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, as a condition of obtaining approval of the Final Map, or of obtaining the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. PRECISE GRADING 39. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 40. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 41. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: ,49i 12 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 42. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 43. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in 13 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 44. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the Site Development Permit preliminary grading plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 45. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 46. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 47. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the pad elevation by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the pad elevations shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 48. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 49. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the Centre Pointe Development and Parcel Map 31116 499 iL! CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 and as modified for this Site Development Permit, or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 51. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 52. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 53. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 54. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. 55. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground 15 5JO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 56. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 57. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 58. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 59. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 60. If permitted by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and the City Engineer, when an applicant proposes discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel,, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate permit from CVWD and shall execute an indemnification instrument as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Additionally, the applicant shall pay for all costs of sampling and testing associated with the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The applicant is required to construct and provide for the maintenance in perpetuity of the required discharge treatment Best Management Practice facilities per the NPDES Permit Supplement A or as approved by the City Engineer. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this Site Development Permit excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. If such discharge is approved for this development, CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 the applicant shall make provisions in the final development CC&Rs or other appropriate instrument for meeting these obligations. The 100-year storm water hydraulic grade line shall be 3 feet below the channel lining and 2 feet below the Project Storm HGL or as determined by CVWD and the City Engineer.; I Additionally, the applicant shall submitverification to the City of CVWD acceptance of the proposed discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with the initial submittal of storm drain improvement plans. 61. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.016 at seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.00 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of; the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. i C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. I 17 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 UTILITIES 62. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 63. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 64. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of. utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 65. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 66. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 67. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 68. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect in California. 18 R 5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 69. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 70. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans to the Planning Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 21 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. LED bulbs shall be used for all landscape lighting fixtures. 71. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash", and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 72. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Planning Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Director and/or City Engineer. 73. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Planning Director. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public streets. 74. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" latest edition, in the design and/or installation of all 19 5 A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 75. The applicant shall replace the proposed Cork Oak tree with Virginiana Oak tree on the plant palette. PUBLIC SERVICES 76. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and as approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 77. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 78. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 79. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 80. The required fire flow shall be available from 5 Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 21 /2" x 21 /2") spaced not more than 350 apart and shall be capable of delivering a fire flow 2000 GPM per minute for four hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the construction site. 81. The minimum dimension for gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. Any gate providing access from a road shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing 5-5 20 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used. 82. Directory display boards will be required adjacent to each roadway access to the development. These shall be an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout that shows the name of complex, all streets, building designators, unit numbers and fire hydrant locations within the complex. These directories shall be a minimum of 4' x 4' in dimension. Addressing of buildings and units shall conform to the Riverside County Addressing Policy. Additional information and details may be obtained by contacting the Fire Department Planning staff. 83. Where required, fire apparatus access roads shall have approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible conditions at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. . 84. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall furnish two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. 85. Prior to issuance of building permits, the water system for fire protection must be provided as approved by the Fire Department and the local water authority. 86. Blue dot retro-reflector pavement markers shall be located on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate location of the fire hydrant per standard number 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org) 87. Fire Apparatus access road shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire Department Standard number 06-05 (located at. www.rvcfire.org). Access lanes will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 60 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of 21 5 _j 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 88. An approved Fire Department access key lock box (Minimum Knox Box 3200 series model) shall be installed next to the approved Fire Department access door to the building. If the buildings are protected with an alarm system, the lock box shall be required to have tampered monitoring. Required order forms and installation standards may be obtained at the Fire Department. 89. Display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side of building(s) and/or rear access if applicable. Numbers and letters shall be a, minimum of 12" in height for building(s) up to 25' in height. In complexes with alpha designations, letter size must match numbers. All addressing must be legible, of a contrasting color, and adequately illuminated to be visible from street at all hours. 90. Install a complete commercial fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler system(s) with pipe sizes in excess of 4" in diameter will require the project Structural Engineer to certify with a "wet signature", that the structural system is designed to support the seismic and gravity loads to support the additional weight of the sprinkler system. All fire sprinkler risers shall be protected from any physical damage. 91. The PIV and FCD shall be located to the front of building within 50 feet of approved roadway and within 200 feet of an approved hydrant. Sprinkler riser room must have indicating exterior and/or interior door signs. A C-16 licensed contractor must submit plans, along with current permit fees, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation 92. Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler system(s) with 20 or more heads, along with current permit fees, to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 93. Install a portable fire extinguisher, with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC, for every 3,000 sq. ft. and/or 75 feet of travel distance. Fire extinguishers shall be mounted 3.5 to 5 ft. above finished floor, measured to the top of the extinguisher. Where not readily visible, signs shall be posted above all extinguishers to indicate their locations. Extinguishers must have current CSFM service tags affixed. 22 5 J 7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 94. No hazardous materials shall be stored and/or used within the building, which exceeds quantities listed in 2010 CBC. No class I, II or IIIA of combustible/flammable liquid shall be used in any amount in the building. 95. Exit designs, exit signs, door hardware, exit markers, exit doors, and exit path marking shall be installed per the 2010 California Building Code. 96. Electrical room doors if applicable shall be posted "ELECTRICAL ROOM" on outside of door. 97. Fire Alarm Control Panel room doors if applicable shall be posted "FACP" on outside of door. 98. Fire Riser Sprinkler room doors if applicable shall be posted "Fire Riser" on outside of door. 99. Roof Access room door if applicable shall be posted "Roof Access" on outside of door. 100. Access shall be provided to all mechanical equipment located on the roof as required by the Mechanical Code. 101. Air handling systems supplying air in excess of 2000 cubic feet per minute to enclosed spaces within buildings shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff. 2010 CMC 102. Gate(s) shall be automatic or manual operated. Install Knox key operated switches, with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Knox Company. Building plans shall include mounting location/position and operating standards for Fire Department approval. 103. The Proposed project may have a cumulative adverse impact on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increase in the number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic and population. The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via capital improvements and/or impact fees 23 5 A CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 104. Nothing in our review shall be construed as encompassing structural integrity. Review of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from all applicable regulations. Final approval is subject to plan review and field inspection. All questions regarding the meaning of the code requirements should be referred to Fire Department at 760-863-8886. 105. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provision for the turnaround capabilities of fire apparatus 106. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or developer shall include in the building plans the required fire lanes and include the appropriate lane printing and/or signs. AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 107. Any outdoor lighting shall be hooded or shielded to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. Outdoor lighting shall be downward facing. 108. The following uses shall be prohibited: A. Any use which would direct a steady or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA -approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. B. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. C. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (Such uses include landscaping utilizing water features, aquaculture, production of cereal grains, 24 „ 5,� CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA O.UINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 sunflower, and row crops, artificial marshes, recycling centers containing putrescible wastes, and construction and demolition debris facilities.) D. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. 109. The "Notice of Airport in Vicinity" shall be provided to all potential tenants and purchasers. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 110. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present on site during any earth moving activities. Should the monitor identify a resource, he/she shall be empowered to stop or redirect earth moving activities until such time as the resource can be properly identified and processed. The archaeological monitor shall be required to prepare a report at the end of earth moving activities and file such report with the Planning Department within 30 days of completion of monitoring activities for any building on the project site. 111. No signage is included with this site development permit approval. A separate Sign Permit is required through the Planning Department if the applicant proposes signs for the facility. 112. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. Screening design and materials shall match existing exterior design style and materials, and shall be approved by the Planning Director. 113. All exterior illumination fixtures (Type V) for the carports and eaves shall be installed at locations that are not directly visible by vehicles or pedestrians. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy by the City of La Quinta Building and Safety Department, fixture locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 114. Prior to issuance of a building permit for each building, the applicant shall submit colored building elevations for all buildings for review and approval by 25 510 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY OCTOBER 16, 2012 the Planning Director. One purpose of the elevation exhibits is to focus on final locations of the PTAC units and decorative screens/grates being incorporated into the elevations. Another purpose of the exhibits is to show final locations of additional shade elements/awnings for windows throughout the project. 115. The duplex cottage units shall utilize a varying paint color palette, similar to the other buildings within the community. 116. A gazebo structure and sitting area shall be provided near the putting green area. Location and construction details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Retirement Residences. 117. All trellis, patio cover, and a shade structures shall be constructed of an "alums -wood" -type material. 26 ,v 51.1. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND CP DEVELOPMENT LA QUINTA, LLC. CASE: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2003-006, AMENDMENT NO.4 WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (the "Development Agreement Law") authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property, all for the purpose of strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation and comprehensive planning, and identifying the economic costs of such development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25"' day of September, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said amendment to a Development Agreement, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012-020, recommending to the City Council approval of Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 4; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 16th day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an amendment to a Development Agreement by and among the City of La Quinta and CP Development La Quinta, LLC for property located at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 5, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code regarding this proposal. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site; and, WHEREAS, at said City Council Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approving an amendment to the Development Agreement: 1. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment (Exhibit A) is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and Specific Plan 2001-055, Amendment 4, in that it will 512 Ordinance No. Development Agreement 2003-006, Amendment No.4 October 16, 2012 Page 2 result in promoting residential development in a controlled and logical manner that is compatible with the neighborhood. 2. The land uses authorized and regulations prescribed for the Development Agreement are compatible with the zoning and its related regulations applicable to the property. 3. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment conforms with the public convenience and general welfare by providing for extensive public improvements and conforms to good land use practice by encouraging a long-range comprehensive approach to development of the site. 4. Approval of this Development Agreement Amendment will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare since adequate provisions have been made in previous City approvals to provide for necessary and desirable improvements which are incorporated herein. 5. Approval of this Development Agreement Amendment will not adversely affect the orderly development of the subject or surrounding properties nor preservation of area -wide property values, but rather will enhance them by encouraging planned -phased growth. 6. Consideration of this Development Agreement Amendment has been accomplished pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.250.030, which governs Development Agreements. WHEREAS, all actions required to be taken by the City precedent to the adoption of this Ordinance have been regularly and duly taken. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. APPROVAL. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the amended Development Agreement in the form presented to the City Council concurrent with the approval and adoption of this Ordinance, and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the Development Agreement on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk to record the Development Agreement in the Official Records of Riverside County in accordance with applicable law. 513 Ordinance No. Development Agreement 2003.006, Amendment No.4 October 16, 2012 Page 3 SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. The La Quinta Planning Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 201 1-617 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. Therefore, the Planning Director recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted and the City Council did adopt said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to this action; and, SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of October, 2012, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California Ordinance No. Development Agreement 2003-006, Amendment No.4 October 16, 2012 Page 4 ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) § CITY OF LA QUINTA 1 I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No._ that was introduced at a regular meeting on the 161" day of October, 2012, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the _ day of 201 _, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution 98-109. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 51, Ordinance No. Development Agreement 2003-006, Amendment No.4 October 16, 2012 Page 5 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on 20_, pursuant to City Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 516 EXHIBIT A RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247 (Exempt from Recording Fee per Gov't Code § 27383) AMENDMENT NO.4 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This AMENDMENT NO.4 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment No. 4") is made and entered into as of 2012 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city organized and existing under the Constitution of the State of California (the "City"), and LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited liability company ("Developer"). RECITALS: A. On or about December 18, 2003, the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and CP Development La Quinta, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Original Developer"),. entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement (the "Original DDA"), pursuant to which the Agency sold to the Original Developer that certain real property located southeast of the Miles Avenue and Washington Street intersection in the City of La Quinta, California 92253 (the "Site"), and the Original Developer agreed to construct, complete, and operate thereon a commercial project containing a medical office/surgical facility, a development containing sanctuary villas, a mid -price suites hotel, a resort -style condominium/casitas development, two (2) sit-down restaurants, and two (2) single-family residential developments, with forty (40) of the single-family homes restricted for sale to income -eligible buyers at restricted sales prices (collectively, the "Original Project"). B. The Original DDA has been amended on six (6) occasions, on or about October 28, 2004, on or about December 7, 2004, on or about November 2, 2005, on or about October 20, 2006, on or about August 23, 2007, and on or about March 19, 2008 (collectively, the "Prior DDA Amendments"). The Original DDA, as amended by the Prior DDA Amendments, is hereinafter referred to as the "DDA," and the Original Project, as amended by the Prior DDA Amendments, is hereinafter referred to as the "Project." C. Concurrently with the execution of the Original DDA, the City and the Original Developer entered into that certain Development Agreement dated December 18, 2003, and recorded against the Site on January 5, 2004, as Instrument No. 2004-0005256, in the Official Records of the County of Riverside (the "Official Records"), for among other purposes, esvolscl000al 3127303.2 a0921112 '� identifying the terms, conditions, and regulations for the construction of the Original Project (the "Original Development Agreement"). D. City and the Original Developer have previously amended the Original Development Agreement on three (3) occasions for purposes of modifying the Original Development Agreement consistent with the Prior DDA Amendments, as follows: (i) on or about October 28, 2004, City and the Original Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on November 8, 2004, as Instrument No. 2004-0885063, (ii) on or about November 17, 2005, City and the Original Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 2 to Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on December 19, 2005, as Instrument No. 2005-1045418, and (iii) on or about May 6, 2008, City and the Original Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 3 to Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on June 4, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008-0303530 (collectively, the "Prior Development Agreement Amendments"), The Original Development Agreement, as amended by the Prior Development Agreement Amendments, is hereinafter referred to as the "Development Agreement." E. On or about April 4, 2005, Parcel Map No. 31116, in the City of La Quinta, was filed in the Official Records of the County of Riverside in Book 212 of Parcel Maps at pages 60- 66, inclusive (the "Parcel Map"). The Parcel Map created legal parcels within the Site, including but not limited to "Parcel 8," which was originally designated for development of a sixty (60) unit single family residential development, and "Parcel 6" and "Parcel 7," which were originally intended -for development of medical office buildings. Pursuant to Lot Line Adjustment No. 2006-452, processed through the City by the Original Developer, said "Parcel 6," "Parcel 7," and "Parcel 8" were merged into "Parcel A" and "Parcel B." F. On or about July 1, 2011, CP sold and Developer purchased "Parcel B" for the purpose of Developer's construction thereon of (i) a one hundred thirty-two (132) suite retirement community, (ii) four (4) single story duplex cottages, (iii) a seventy-two (72) suite assisted living community, and (iv) a thirty-two (32) bed memory care facility (collectively, the "Senior Living Facility"). "Parcel B" is legally described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. G. On June 28, 2011, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 26 ("ABxl 26") and companion bill Assembly Bill 27 ("ABxl 27") from the 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session of the California Legislature. ABxl 26 immediately suspended all redevelopment agency activities, except continued performance of "enforceable obligations," and set forth a process to dissolve redevelopment agencies and end redevelopment in California. ABxI 27 provided a "voluntary alternative redevelopment program," which would have allowed redevelopment agencies to remain in existence and continue redevelopment, if remittance payments were made to cover the State of California's budget shortfall for fiscal year 2011-12 and were made in subsequent fiscal years to cover State costs. A lawsuit was filed, challenging the constitutionality of both ABx 1 26 and ABxl 27. The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of ABxl 26, revising the effective dates of certain provisions, and struck down as unconstitutional ABxl 27. (California Redevelopment Assn. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4" 231 ("CRA Case"). ABxl 26 is chapter 5, Statutes 2011, First Extraordinary Session, which added Part 1.8 (suspension provisions) and Part 1.85 (dissolution provisions) of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code. nN0156IM061 3127303.2 e0921112 -2- ., 518 Under the CRA Case, all redevelopment agencies dissolved February 1, 2012. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 341710), added by Part 1.85 of Division 24, and City Council Resolution No. 2012-002, the City is the "successor agency" to the former Agency. H. On June 27, 2012, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 1484 from the 2011-2012 Regular Session of the California Legislature ("AB 1484"), which established that successor agencies are separate legal entities from the entities that provide for their governance. As a result of AB 1484, the successor agency to the former Agency is now formally the "City as Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency" (the "Successor Agency"). I. Concurrently herewith, Developer has submitted and the City has processed, an amendment to the Center Point Specific Plan, also known as Specific Plan No. SP2001-055, as previously amended (the "Specific Plan"), to modify the uses permitted on certain portions of the Site (the "2011 Specific Plan Amendment"), and (ii) the Developer has submitted to the Successor Agency, for approval, that certain Amendment No. 7 to Disposition and Development Agreement ("Amendment No. 7 to DDA") to modify the residential component of the Project to provide for the development of the Senior Living Facility. J. The City and Developer now desire to amend the Development Agreement to modify the description of the Project and certain obligations of the Developer set forth therein. The parties contemplate that, concurrently with the City Council's consideration of this Amendment No. 4, (i) the City Council will consider the 2011 Specific Plan Amendment, and (ii) the Successor Agency will consider Amendment No. 7 to DDA. K. The City Council has determined that this Amendment No. 4 is consistent with the City's General Plan and the Specific Plan, as amended by the 2011 Specific Plan Amendment, including the goals and objectives thereof. L. All actions taken by City have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA"), and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters. M. On 2012, the City Council adopted its Ordinance No. approving this Amendment No. 4. Unless otherwise specified herein, all capitalized terms in this Amendment No. 4 shall have the meaning ascribed in the Development Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and for valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Development Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1.1 To replace Section 3.1(C) with the following: 882015610-0061 rZ 3127303.2 a09a1/12 -3- ;i (C) a retirement living facility ("Senior Living Facility"), to be constructed on Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. 2006-452 in the City of La Quinta; with (i) a 132-suite retirement community; and (ii) four single -story duplex cottages; and (iii) a 72-suite assisted living community; and (iv) a 32-bed memory care facility; 2. This Amendment No. 4 shall not be effective unless and until (i) the Successor Agency has approved Amendment No. 7 to DDA, and the Successor Agency and Developer have executed Amendment No. 7 to DDA, and (ii) Developer and the Original Developer have executed an assignment and assumption agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, pursuant to which the Original Developer assigns to the Developer and the Developer assumes from the Original Developer all of the Original Developer's rights and obligations under the DA with respect to Parcel B and the Senior Living Facility. 3. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Amendment No. 4, all of the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 4. In the event of any action between City and Developer seeking enforcement of any of the terms and conditions to this Amendment No. 4, the prevailing party in such action shall be awarded, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief, its reasonable costs and expenses, including without limitation its expert witness fees and reasonable attorney's fees. 5. This Amendment No. 4 shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as if prepared by both parties hereto. 6. This Amendment No. 4 shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of California and any question arising hereunder shall be construed or determined according to such law. The Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Riverside, or such other appropriate court in such county, shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any litigation between the parties concerning this Amendment No. 4. Service of process on City shall be made in accordance with California law. Service of process on Developer shall be made in any manner permitted by California law and shall be effective whether served inside or outside California. 7. Time is of the essence of this Amendment No. 4 and of each and every term and provision hereof. 8. A waiver of a provision hereof, or modification of any provision herein contained, shall be effective only if said waiver or modification is in writing, and signed by both City and Developer. No waiver of any breach or default by any party hereto shall be considered to be a waiver of any breach or default unless expressly provided herein or in the waiver. 9. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile shall be deemed binding. However, each party agrees to submit their original signature to the other party within five (5) business days after execution hereof. 882101500-0061 3127303.2 a09121/12 -4_ 520 10. This Amendment No. 4 may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when this Amendment No. 4 has been signed by all the parties hereto, shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 11. The person(s) executing this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 4 such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 4, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 4 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which such party is bound. [Signatures on next page] 882/015610-0061 5 1 3127303.2 e0921/12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer each hereby represents that it has read this Amendment No. 4, understands it, and hereby executes this Amendment No. 4 to be effective as of the day and year first written above. "Developer" LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership By: La Quinta GP LLC, a Washington limited liability company Its: General Partner By: Hawthorn Management Services Corp., a WashingtonVIPoration Its: M-"7 Date: QC �S� lie 2012 By: Barton G. Colson Its: President ATTEST: Susan Maysels, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP LM "City" CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city organized and existing under the Constitution of the State of California 2012 By: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager 882/015610-0061 381273031 a09Rv@ -6- � -- � 3�l1» State of County ofaig;ttie C1nX On ©JaA l3 --xo%z before me, W1'n i . COrwS pp� ��� (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared CsY� 6. �D Z; who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personX whose name FSj is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helrkekl+ey executed the same in his/hetltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his4leFAeir signature�gj on the instrument the perso or the entity upon behalf of which the personcted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my handZL dffil Signature �I State of California County of Riverside M before me, NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON ROBIN R. GOINS (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) sa2/015610A061 3127303.2 a0921/12 - -7- �.% EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B Real property in the Qty of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of CalifmWa, desalbed as follows: PARCEL B AS SHOWN ON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO.2006-452 AS EVIDENCED BY DpXUMENT RECORDED APRIL 19, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. ZD06.020D726 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PARCEL 8 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 31116, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 212, AT PAGES 60 THROUGH 66, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS, BEING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 8; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY, EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 8 THROUGH THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1) NORTH 430 56' 44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 152.65 FEET; (2) THENCE NORTH D00 12' 13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 790.73 FEET; (3) THENCE SOUTH 890 4747' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 239.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING.A RADIUS OF 80.00 FEET; (4) THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A.CENTRAL ANGLE OF 450 2741", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 63.48 FEET; (5) THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 440 44' 32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 490 06' 37" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 8 AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 230 W 45", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 183.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 840.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 250 11'52" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 7, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF D40 02' 08", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 7; '821015610-0061 3127303.2 a0921/12 ,. 52 THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 7 THROUGH THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 160 39' 14- EAST AND NON -TANGENT TO LAST SAID CURVE, AS DISTANCE OF 55.87 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET, (2) THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 200 41' 22°, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 90.27 FEET, (3) THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 040 02' 08- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 333.46 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 8, THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINES OF PARCEL 7 AND ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 8, SOUTH 50010- 13- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 592.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM AGENCY EXCEPTS AND RESERVES FROM THE CONVEYANCE, HEREIN DESCRIBED ALL INTEREST OF THE AGENCY IN OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO DRILL INTO, THROUGH, AND TO USE AND OCCUPY ALL PARTS OF THE PROPERTY LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEROF FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES INCIDENTAL TO THE EXPLORATION FOR AND PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES OR MINERALS FROM SAID PROPERTY OR OTHER LANDS, BUT WITHOUT, HOWEVER, ANY RIGHT TO USE EITHER THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY OR ANY PORTION THEROF WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SURFACE FOR ANY PURPOSE OR PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, OR TO USE THE PROPERTY IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO CREATE A DISTURBANCE TO THE USE OR ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RECORDED DECEMBER 09, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 04-979137 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 604-630-027-6 9921015610-0061 3127303.2 n09R1/12 '2' 5 2-5) SEE SHEET 2 FOR _ ANNOTATION TABLES AND NOTES T D. PARCEL S g DETAL 'A' 'Aa& >w :[[[�� (- � . y, . s �. m27 r o ' •13.515 AC, ' PARCEL B �u 10 G/L TO' ACCESS I LOT LINE TO 9E PARCEL 98' I 9.451 AC. PARCEL S PI NEW ADJUSTED LOT UNE R4 <TO J LOT ��' LOT LINE TO Be JJ LOT DELETED PARCEL 8 � �y SEE DETAIL •A• AT UPPER LEFT ea SCALE: 1" 200' OR4/ L8LINE of MSA- Coxsui mNa, INc. LEQFHD MAUIBBM Same t AM=TgL Tire —I E)=ND LOT LINE TO BE DELETED T7iunmo a Cf ■ Lmm Suw ® I EXISTING LOT LINE TO ROM — — 342M Bw Ian Dow ■ RAmm bhLma ■ CA MW NEW ADJUSTED LOT LINE iw.nams CMM $204M • FAx (M 323-7M RESTRICTED ACCESS 882/015610-Ml a -3- 5 -_ 3127303.2 e09/21/12 La Quinta Retirement Community Miles Ave. and Seeley Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 Developer: Architect: Hawthorn Development LLC Daniel Roach Cal #33282 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr. 471 High St SE, Suite 10 Suite 200 Salem, Oregon 97301 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (503) 399-1090 (503) 399-1090 ra37>r1 iri9 De;)S:;(„ra,if a�eF cAUF°� DRAWING INDEX ARCWTECTURAL MI�7T5EEEC-- -�_, _ eaA�eel 191rt= re a.e 517E F'lANTI91Pl2TND�).- TE.PLAL'LfE0tRHPN0) LANDSCAPE. ]--ANNPJ- A_A L. NC=APE FIA&CSOLID!L 111DJ.- ,gPE.0$a1Q '.]AI Ifa44 .5A_I AunsrAPL9MADECLA&__,... _ �... A-ii CTeTFMAV r YUTrJt: R du.lhOPTH F___NDI - _Ae7-E]i18Rif�i.LYaMIQ�C J3AEl,f80t1TN ENDJ - -A.8-EXTEI-eina r Ir uryr.-DEIAlL-4 e.e R�NOEFiAG.eroncvr_TOFE -dew J?€M`.JI'QTETJ2MECTIvP- "JRETInETy_g7..£L11LOWq jFJ _Ev.AniG: 4 C1�rRED. Gl1ILDH'ICvELEYATIC1dE.__ .FETIRECIENY..HtIlLR14C ELEvgil�,_ _Cd ORMJ!LgLDBYv_ELEVALk3bB- _ ICI lfffi�ENT_.Blll W LNG. ELEvA11LiN9 -_A:12a_f�.t%�D.LIIILDIDICtFLEvAnOH�� - _Atx..RE1491 EM r3773F.-E'LAN A1L39ESIBET7Fw7 F11g57 Rdd1x.P.L.11tl�.-�- Ir�.PLO _ .A-'---JW-IINEMENT -FlPPldt'L d-!e __JSETI�e-lEwr..L118D-EI ma a eu IMED - A-11. REII>2FtTEt;L �AL3u r'rlur. --;7( .� A-1G _A55167EG LfvRdG.EACILI/T. PLhY - EISTFD . tJT31_ _A55tflYECiLIXMGEAGtLiT3:-ELlr-y A991flLEQ Lrv.W ELEvdT A -geWY.AGIITY.dP VE-- -21 g]Na EvnT fLGD1@.FLAt1 .A:72_J1561&TEq.LLYAIG.FGtaJQ_Fid P.L AN -_A-Z3 rnTTAGF_1LANS.and ELEVAIlIX6 el_LO)SAGE ".E Fidha.add.l=4EvALCom vau �Arrecs+� E3..9�L.Md..ELEYA7! . .-..A-26_ rrcvr L✓ .rs F� m� d ovADQm&_- DEi -A-21 J.MTIREFII4JT B•t� 9Er�12M8 _ .A2s_4E7AIL5-_ __ — cn3acz _ PRc� �cLuw>E�.aLe�Frr pf_Arf ('fAE-' itrT l.Qdf]k�eu 1 _PRELIi:LC 4An41GPLPHI- .PNYt3(1FF�IE$rF,Lro sl'a 8M El`=AWES RlC_ lofiEfiE14LH 13Nl 4'T"FL"'L67✓ III dr'•'.TLP:_A I SITE VICINITY MIS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROJECT DATA TABLE ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER (BOOK, PAGE AND PARCEL NUMBER) PM31116 - BOOK 212 - PAGES 60-66 - APN 604-630-027-6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TO TIE WIDREfEARFD W 1H16 mM9RNFM IS SiNATED IN 1MECTY Of IAQUIMA COUNII'OFPhfltVCE, STALE oc rauaxWw 0.� R OESW B®AS rg1M2 PMm R/5 EIpvM IXlLOTUNE MT TNEfR N0.2W6952A5 EVI06YQ0 BVDCMiEMREOANED APWL 19, 2006 A9 WSTRIIN1FNr NO 2006UIDOrz60FIXT1O01RKOR05, BEING MGRE PPRilO1WnY DEYJUBE➢A6 TIE CT'DF IAQUBrt0. CO.MIT DF RhflSIDE, SrATEOF CAl1FM.Wq PAACfl B TOr£II[R NTTH T14TfO0.TroN of PAAO:L] gPAR03 MeP rv0 31116, tS SHWrtI er MAa ON FlIELv aDPt 212, AT PAGE fATINgIGH 66, a11U5rvE, OF PAROR M.➢G, N4Ha51DE COUNTY PEC S, BEINGWTE SOUIX IWFOFSECDPV 19, T0'M1T'ABPSSONH, PAHGE]EAST,SBM, MORE POATMMLY DE�ALB®AS FgIp'15: BFLI NW LNG AT TE MOST SOUMFALV CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 6; T4S10=ALONG TIE SOUIHHSTEItLT, EASIFTLT AFD NPiTI&LY BOUIUAAY U.VES OF 541D PARCEL B T,Ib]UM Tt FOUWIING FlVE (5] CgIRSFS: Ill NIXlTH93° 56' 99' FAST,AOiSTNiQOF 152 fi5 FELT; R1 T,erlo=NORTH aw lY lr vh r,ADlsru�aFnB.r3 PtFr; 0I mH,� sourN e9°m 9r vrsr, AacnAA'a: aF zB9 w F¢TTa � RLGVAv1nGaFATavmT WNE, caNCAVE FIaITHFw,TFmv, HaL9ru A RAnws a 6B BB IEfT; (97 TIFN(E NDRTA'r£91ERLY AIOf.G1MfARCOFSAIOOKv�THROIIOIAO3IIRAL AVGU Cf 95°R91", AIi AAC OISTAN(Eg63.90 FEET; (5) TIM[ETNir£MTOSVD CIRVE NORTH 94° q9' 32'v,ESI, A DLSTAVCE OF 9161 FEET TOTHE BEGIN: WG OFA NGMTaY6NTONYE, CONCAVE FlgrnA'A"55TfALY, HAVUiG A PADIUS OF99000 I FfET,A PADIAL UIE PASSING 1HtO.b1YJD PoNn BFAAS SOIIIH SY 06'3T Fl5r; IIQKr KYMp[F]Oty AgK•1F[MCP SA90R11 M'!W'FIMA�GAtaP<SVDrS4a@Lr 1PSu MROtruorygn RPe Nom�eLxLrtq eAtirA1L`6 ]. iP]IILrN A L@ApLNRY V 13•N K', N ARC DISTAME tl 10363 fEEr TOME BEGIM'llNGOPACOMPoU.0 OAtYE, CIXJPAV£ NptTNFSRPLY, HAVING ARMIU90F 090In fFEr, A PADALIINEPA55WG1M0.IXIGH SAiD roINr BFAFSSWIH 25° 1l' S2" HST: rF�r:¢selmn,EsfuvALwuTHf AReawD OlxwEmD oxRv. ,NG o2ar�G suo raeMnLr Iu,E aF P•uai ], nwDlr;NA �mxAvr� DF w° or oe•,wr AneolsTav�aF s916 F�TrDT�rrosT NonTnmLrNORnnYEsr caRrr DF SRroPermr iMML3lgr: nt N[SiGLrLpLyq son NrOl1T/0.911HKt0pMw:ileiL [llgre3« (6) �IIM I6° H 1C HST P3ID NIl4TAVGnrtTO UST SAIDOMYE, ASDSTPME OF 550> FfETTO TIE BEG:NNPlGOFATAVBir WIVE, CONCAVE I',£6TFALY, HAVWGA PADMOF250.00 fEFf, RI T(NCE SgTPfnLY aLOVG 1HEARCOF SND(aRVE, TXi01g1 A CEVIRN ANGIEOF2D' 91 R', PN AAC OISfAVCE OF 902] FEEr; C3ITIIFA�TYM,MTTOSnB3 aMYE 53UM W° BY OB' VrIIT,AOCTM'(E W ]Ale6�>b M AgrTYaE]gtrf90]Ip4LTKlNpx M'.glrH•/6TRLv LLNEtl YLnNG6l M!Q IFANu1G sAm Y.ESIe+LY urvfsoF PARm ] AND AIq,G Sra rfo tlr nquraTAwsonwa�+m•Iee nnrcx i sam. w' ar lr uar. a s'Irn q xsxl IrF lone rcw*o eEGWwwc IX(E411NG 1HEAHAOMACENCY IXQAISfND DESERVES F&NATIE COMMMIQHEAEIN gAtIBE➢ALL WIEAFSTOFIHE IGBICY WOR, GAS, HYptWWdg19J95r SMU MWEW.S OF E4H2V qlD OrvDOWOCIFA L11NRMgS IPu111M'{reA0aff00J rrr3 rppv M p1AFAQ 3pg;ryp WRM ^! 0.a7a 3a pule l`IKLrFN.aLAlin P BT{ANpgprA•Au rAr35P nF3nr{a3vr11vnrArw ww FrV¢39/aDcnl6ml R2T14vNnl5uY/K'nBV IaIA-fWAb,tr NpfaSS r+tlDb]Tn ]a M �oaoWMIF W44W MYW.TyPtl OG, GVIN�RGC�tl99AGM�q K�iMCN LO RIGgR�rTYI TI@ uN4l TTiOIR, NC VR NIY RIGInTO I15E EIIHFATNE SLNFAtF OFTHEVP019OY 0GAVY P(MrIIXIT9tOFvlIIISI FNEMA'�RED15001 FEFTOFTIE9PFI�fOR NfY nIRR"iff OR RIPPo5E5 vAWT50E4HL qt TO IISETHE fROVERtt IN AIM A MNMF]lFS TOO cATEA DLSIIM04vCclOTIE USEOR@WYFBR OFIHE RtOPOItt, AS REYuvED W lHE DEFll FROM IAg11NlA PE9EVELOLIENIPLBKY. PE(DapED o[�f�A D3, 2009 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION (AND PROPOSED IF APPLICABLE) RM - RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION (AND PROPOSED IF APPLICABLE) MHDR - MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN TITLE AND LAND USE DESIGNATION (AND PROPOSED IF APPLICABLE) AMENDMENT #3 FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 EXISTING LAND USE AND PROPOSED LAND USE EXISTING = VACANT / NEW= 132 SUITE CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY, 4 DUPLEX COTTAGES, 72 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY WITH 32 BED MEMORY CARE FACILITY. TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA IDENTIFIED IN SQUARE FEET AND ACRES 411,681 SgFI / 9.45 AC. TOTAL NET SITE AREA IDENTIFIED IN SQUARE FEET AND ACRES 411,681 SgFt / 9.45 AC. TOTAL BUILDING AREA IDENTIFIED IN SQUARE FEET AND PERCENTAGE OF NET SITE AREA 111,188 SgFt / 27% TOTAL PARKING/DRIVES AREA IDENTIFIED IN BOTH SQUARE FEET AND PERCENTAGE OF NET SITE AREA 97,636 SgFt / 23.7 % TOTAL WALK/PATIO/RECREATION AREA IDENTIFIED IN BOTH SQUARE FEET AND PERCENTAGE OF NET SITE AREA 70,748 SgFt / 17.2% TOTAL OPEN AREA IDENTIFIED IN BOTH SQUARE FEET AND PERCENTAGE OF NET SITE AREA 131,343 SgFt / 32.1% IDENTIFICATION OF PARKING RATIOS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE AND PROVIDED RETIREMENT RESIDENCE: .60 SPACES PER 1 BED ASSISTED LIVING / MEMORY CARE: 25 SPACES PER 1 BED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY CITY CODE AND PROVIDED 117 SPACES REQUIRED / 134 SPACES PROVIDED NUMBER OF ADA PARKING SPACES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED 7 SPACES REQUIRED / 8 SPACES PROVIDED GREATEST NUMBER OF STORIES AND SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA PER FLOOR 3 STORY / 46.372 SgFt GREATEST HEIGHT OF ANY BUILDING 42'-0" MAX AT RIDGE OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE AND 35' AT PARAPET WALL (40'-0" ALLOWABLE) OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (PER C TYPE 1-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (PER CBC) ATTACHMENT # 1 TYPE V-A Daniel RoachOCChIfBCY ADDRESS: HIGH STREET SE, SUITE IO HAWTHOR S471 ALEM, SALEM, OREGON 97301 — 503-399-Ig9(1 FAX. 5[13-399�565 TELEPHONE: 3150 Kettle Cart SE SaIm.0regm97301 RETIREMENT GROUP REMOW I O r S033991090 r5033990565 wklftywrl letfire.cgn 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Sulte200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 - - 0 of 36 ' n X ic M z UNR Daniel Roacherchited C-11 I * - * ' 3150 Kahle Court SE Salem, Oregon 97301 NA P5033991090 P5033990565 wleoKyant tedure,anm HAWTHORN`� RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-15 50 Fax (360) 213-1540 PROJECT STATISTICS: nnn irrr An A. TOTAL AREA 9.451 Acres Retirement Site 5.860 Acres Assisted Living Facility 3.591 Acres Retirement Site: 255,278 sq ft Main Building 45,372 sq ft Cottages 13,352 sq ft Poolhouse/Tool Shed 809 sq ft Total Buildings 59,533 sq ft Parking / Drives 85,818 sq ft Patios / Walks 17,562 sq ft Rec. area - impervious 2,280 sq ft Rec. area - pervious 20,330 sq ft Open area 69,755 sq ft Assisted Living Site: 155,639 sq ft Main Building 51,655 sq ft Parking / Drives 11,820 sq ft Patios / Walks 25,068 sq ft Recreational area 5,508 sq ft Open area 61,588 sq ft Parking: Phase 1 and Phase 2 Open Spaces 87 Spaces Covered Spaces 24 Spaces Accessible Spaces 8 Spaces Cottage Garages/Spaces 16 Spaces Total 135 Spaces Total Suites 221 Suites (Parking Ratio = .6 Spaces/Suite) SCALE: 1 " = 40'-0" L r1 0 20 40 80 1204 23.3% 33.6% 6.9% 0.9% 8.0% 27. 3% 33.2% 7.6% 4.4% 16.1% 39.7% N 49'06'37' :9 I — A HORIZONTAL PATH OF TRAVEL Y a�as'2�'•r' !r L�53 t8' r Park I F SUITES 11� K- '16 15 1 ex16T►1G �� HIGH cru WALL �i L 1 ,I 13 IN a PROJECT STATISTICS: PROJECT AREA: TOTAL AREA 9.451 Acres Retirement Site 5.860 Acres 00 Assisted Living Facility 3.591 Acres It. Retirement Site: 255,278 sq ft Main Building 45,372 sq ft a..+ f� Cottages 13,352 sq ft Poolhouse/Tool Shed Total Buildings 809 sq ft 59,533 sq ft 10 Parking / Drives 85,818 sq ft Patios / Walks 17,562 sq ft Rec. area - impervious 2,280 sq ft Rec. area - pervious 20,330 sq ft .� Open area 69,755 sq ft Assisted Living Site: 155,639 sq ft to Main Building 51,655 sq ft Parking / Drives 11,820 sq ft 14 Patios / Walks 25,068 sq ft Recreational area 5,508 sq ft Open area 61,588 sq ft Parking: on Phase 1 and Phase 2 Open Spaces 87 Spaces Covered Spaces 24 Spaces Accessible Spaces 8 Spaces •� Cottage Garages/Spaces 16 Spaces Total 135 Spaces a--z Total Suites 221 Suites N (Parking Ratio = .6 Spaces/Suite) .r ELECTRICAL LEGEND X DFSSlryryyG ATION DESCRIPTION y T METAL HALIDE 9HOEBOX WITH IV POLE I� O W FLUORESCENT LANDSCAPE LIGHT MOUNT AT 24" r: O W4 PATIO LIGHT MOUNT AT W-O" J ® W7 FLAGPO E ILLUMNATOR MOUNTED ON TOP OF FLAG POLE OO M SURFACE MOUNT HID CANOPY FIXTURE O SEE SHEET A-8 FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS L m SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" �t p 0 15 30 60 90 V 4aRY CA MATCHLINE ACILITY ' ne Story) 1' ADA — I I HORIZONTAL ,�1 10 Daniel Roachwhitea HAWTHOR 3150 KeRla Cat SE Salem, Oregon 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP R 503 399 1090 FSW"90565 wW*YQtN ctv 9310 NE Van—ver Mall Dr., Suile200 Vancouver, WA 98662-6210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 23.3% 33.6% 6.9% 0.9% 8.0% 27.3% 33.2% 7.6% 4.4% 16.1% 39.7% :: ,s i I T x% 1 I 'I" , VAMW ----MEMORY -------MATCHLINE------- .� (17 SUITE __ F42�NGtrP. \ �- �' ¢f , CA MA7CHLIN r II -- - � b �.' o @1 . \ FACILITY t� IA wWlyeperEcrAeLc �. )` 1 \b j neStory) 1 I W® yCiOeey PE13 LOrAL I , / , �: I I , is ADA I I I 10 HORIZONTAL 1 PATH l_ I G T jE R4vEL EXISTING 6' - + I K • BTA14E� ECL 0 J _ _ I \ I ` ! - _ W NIGH GhHI WALL _ - r d MIX-mie FAM1bv rr� t I ti h aea+Ivp�rAl�arwee 1jE iCop- OppAALa ww nAca.Enc Locce 1 AND I VOEJKEIP6 , fE451DE1 lift w 'r1F 5.86 Acres Fir ~.` _ O'MIW ream I I . i •. ti .132 SUITE RETIREM T ��- F r PiL $ RESIDENCE }t (Three Story) ` ♦ \�\ Pool rrl+nMe ` i ali�..� - � � �• � �� d _.t--- RASE 1 q • +ALL ��\ �� , `. -�` � - �' � 3 I .n ' Hose .� \ I ems• ~—'fuse — -- I +V ` , EXISTING G' \ ///� p •- EI'1ERGENGT VEHICLE G iE5 HIGH GI'iu WALL pd \•r ACCESS R TE Carport I f r Fir e� IZ \/ r0ex I - �na tali-rRl-F1 T Ib r� , \ t9Elgp0 Q�'yr• -- I 13 J ! II I `=y� p \ Pahl OF Tw EEL. f \ TjO Future Park n Future Building (Surgical) Duplex I LL L �` : `y�• s� ��` Gotta e F m a } • 9liitding a Op Few 0 AGC Ep9 i y F — {rhl�� t � AApATE TwrtAL ' • r ,r3� T`lt�ry �- ` w !•ATM h j o Tu nc Y ' 1 4 lex I Du I Cott e.F I ; of p f tB d nor X SEE SHEET A-1 FOR PROJECT STATISTICS ` dlF4 � , / L1J SCALE: V = 30'-0" ` 3 15 30 60 90 PROJECT NAME LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEETNAME: SITE PLAN (SOUTH END) of EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 f 32 AMENDMENT#3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 20DI-055 / OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 —1 VANCOUVER. WA 98662-8210 i TREPHONE: {S031399.1090 I FAX: [3031399-05d5 ! ` 1 - ARCHITECT: Doniel RooCh Col 433282 Daniel Roacharrhlled ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 HAWTHOR SALEM.OREGON 97301 TELEPHONE: 503-399-IM 1 FAX; $03.399-0565 • 3150Kettle CourtSESalem,0n n97301 RETIREMENT GROUP pr C1, P5033991090 F5033990565 WleltymdirAct to 9310NEVanmuver Mall Dr., SuIte200 REVA1014• iJ� A— 1 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 3JCI �5� Of -, r L, 14 NOTE- REFER TO SHEET A-5 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES. SSC—AILE: tT—= 3-00'i"� __ 15 330 60 D PRo wwe I I A [ll IILJTA MATCHLINE R"'^E' LANDSCAPE PLAN .—.•—• — r----.— �.vwmonie: iutrao. ain DanielRoach^«hII«I HAWTHORI iT� RETIREMENT GROUPor s erg ueow 'oa� sec 6-fEF f IJeEp N � RN1TLRh!!!! yt;iG2 lwEEf ipg Future Building (Surgical) l MATCHLINE 10 13 14 34 NOTE- REFER TO SHEET A-5 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES. SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" Rum FNE97 33 15 30 60 90 PROJECT NAME. LA Q U I N TA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: LANDSCAPE PLAN (SOUTH END) � I 3 2 EXHISIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 {y�f AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: i HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR. SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: S03 399•I= 1 FAX: f 1503 399^O.SM 31 ARCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 Daniel Roach°rchited UJAWTHOR ADDRESS: SALEM,OREG TSE,SUI1 ___ SALEM, OREGON 97301 TELEPHONE: 3150 KW[e Faun SESalem' Oregon 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP r 5033991090 P5033990565 wlenitmclRedve.cam 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite200 REVISION:_ Vancouver, WA 98662-6210 (360)213-1550 F- (360)213-1540 — — - -- 503r399-0565 A--4 5 oF 36 CM.U, COLUMNS WITH STONE VENEER TO MATCH BUILDING 0 �� r� a• .ly 1 ` COL. SEAT WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH —(2) STEPS, 4" RISERS, 16' TREADS EACH MATCH G-I4/'NATURALLT SIDE CALM" COLOR 'IpYT 44/215 C OR 10 FIN. GRADE x. POOL DECK PF CM11 FIRE PIT WALL WITH STONE CAPI EXT STONE VENEER TO MATCH Bu ILOING, FIRE BRICK INTERIOR WITH GAS FIRE RI POURED IN PLACE NATURAL CONCRETE /41• AND RED VOLDAIJID ROCK BACKFILL SEAT AND BACKREST WITH SMOOTH NOTE- 645 VALVE TO BE INSTALLED TROWEL FINISH AND RADIUS TOOLED PER LOCAL CODES. TYPE AND CONTROL EDGES, SLOPE SEAT FOR DRAINAGE, PROVIDE TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS AT d,` METHOD TO BE DETERMINED POINTS OF RADIUS TANGENCY AND AT 22-5 5PACING FIRE PIT LOWER DECK .01 DRAINAGE PLANS • PLAN VIEW FOR -a.. POURED IN RACE NATURAL CONCRETE ns• '.8' SEAT AND BACKREST WITH SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH AND RADIUS TOOLED EDGES, SLOPE SEAT FOR DRAINAGE, PRECAST OR CAST -IN -PLACE NATURAL PROVIDE TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS AT CONCRETE CAP WITH JRN POINTS OF RADWS TANGENCY AND AT �'�p rt CMTc COLUMNS WITH STONE VENEER TO 225' SPACING 6A0!['RClm MgiCN BUILDING SMOOTH FIN15H ON PLASTER ATOP .- BACKRESTWALL.SLOPETOWARDS FINISH GRADE BEHIND WALL r .1� .... STEEL REINFORCING TBD. I i POOL DECK - (2) STEPS, 4" RISERS, 16" TREADS COL SEAT WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH BUILDIL)-'NATURALLY NOTE- TIOHS CUSTOM SEAT AND MOYY 44l2FIFd=>'iT LDu�R OEpC CALM" COLOR 10YY 15 BACKREST CUSHIONS BY OWNER SECTION _—' CMY FjW PIT WALL wfTw 6TONE CAP . EXT STONE VENEER TO MATCH BUILDING. FIRE BRICK INTERIOR WITH GAS FIRE RING AND RED VOLCANIC ROCK BACKFILL PLANTING LEGEND Wont.) GRASSES / PERENNIALS / GROUND COVERS Ag.panthue afrkanue 'Pater Pan' I gal- LOW Dwarf Llly-of-the Nfle Aeprdmtre elatTOr I gal- LOW NW5-FZAI5Ed RENTER WILL Pi 2.8 CAP MITER Cast Iron Plant W 2 DIFFERENT HEIGHTS. _FNERS Bulbine Frut-COme 'Hallmark' I gal. LOW 13' HIGH WILL BE DE51WATED 'B' PT 4.4 POST Orange Bulbine AB A' AND 34" HIGH ON 'HE "e PLAN PT 2.6 W/ z "„6^ Dales gregg❑ I gal. LOW n GALvANIZED BOLTS TrailTng Indigo Bush N 4 MIL PLASTIC LINER Dist— bfcOlor I gal, LOW SECTION - SANDY LOAM TOPSOIL African Iris F W W 6RApE Lantana 'Confetti' I gel- MODERATE � Trailing Lantana Pennlsetum alopecuroTdas'Hameln' I gal. LOW I ,!- PER PLAN Dwarf Fountain Gras. p,T, 4xa I P.S. 2xb Roemarinus, Officinal le Proetratue Trailing Rosemary I gaL LOW Teucrfum chamaedrg. I gaL LOW Germander F—tuce ovina 'Elijah Blue' � - Blue Fee. —From Rooted Cutting. flats a 6" oc- MODERATE Provlde I" fine compost mulch layer I�Gezanta 'Sunburst' Fe ­tad Cuttings MODERATE Sunburst Gazerfa From flats a S" oc. provide I" fine compost mulch layer Annual Flower. by season 4" Pots a 9" oa. WXW -' provide I" fine compost mulch layer RAISED PLANTER = Hybrid Bermuda/Rye-Blue Mix Sod MODERATE d SoLawn area. 1 (PRESSURE TREATED) Detention Basin Seed Mix HHuudree oed I4dlll SCALE: 1/2"=l'-O" Sheap'. Fescue 8�/ 1000 eI_ "Sonora Shine" river rock (1/2" to 3" size) ground cover L--1 3" min- layer over filter rabrlC-available KRC Rock Palm Sppringg Gold or equal local Boulders, 1000-15000 Size range Provfda 20 tone of Desert Gold 16" rubble to be scattered among boulder groupings on site Tn natural pattern- available KRC Rock Note- All shrub bed. to receive a 2-3" layer of "Desert Gold" or equal decorative gravel ground cover-avafleble KRC Rock FIRE PIT 2 Rear Pat:o SGILE, NlG nw .µ era..aaeva Ym WATER USE CALCULATIONS TOTAL 51TE LANDSCAPE AREA - 125,035 S. TOTAL IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE AREA = 105,330 .-L r �iiu►.7_•r..:TFT*'_'. �i�iR.'fiaeTr[Smq���4Fi►_m..� ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE (150) x (20) x (39k2l) x (62) / (140) / (9W)• 541.43 CLF EAAWJ (LOW HTDRDZONE81 (150) x (50) x (41,186) x (,62)1(146) / (.90)• 1623b4 OCF EAAIUI (MODERATE HTDROZaES) (150) x (.10) x (8,943) x (b2) / (14B) / (20)z IM420 CCF EAAW (LAWN HTDROZONES) (150) x (20) x (1481) x (62) / (148) / (.90). 8211 CCF EAAllU (HKaH HTDROZONES) (150) x 020) x (81) x (62) / (14B) = 65 CCF EAALiU (FOINTANS) (15D) x (0) x (16,1W) x (b2) / (148) - 0 CCF EAA➢.1 (PERMEABLEMON-IRWGATED) EAAWU TOTAL(EATAJI 3350b4 CCF EATAWU 3350b4 CCF far leas than MAAWA 3886A5 CCF NOTE- ETo for La OuTnta per (WILD_ = 15_0 Cr1W. WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH AND MOwiDED DMIL WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH AND PRECAST OR CAST-IN-PLAGE CAP TO MATCH BIIILOWJG-ICl_ "ELOORADO TAN' COLOR VTY 61436 MOUNDED CAP TO MATCH ELILDING-ICI, 1NATURALLT CALM" COLOR -WTT 44ar NATURAL CONCRETE CAP NOTE- MASONRY COLLrIN AND WALL Grill C[IIJwS v rH STUNIZ STRICIURAL DESIGN! TO 131 DECORATIVE IROJ OR PAINTED CEMENT BOARD BY ENGINEER PANELS ATTACHED TO WALL WITH SPACERS FOR 6" VENEER TO MATCH BUILDINGBE OFFSET COLOR TO BE IL.I AUTUMN BLI WYR 26/323 5 FT. HK.. BLACK TUBE _ A STEEL POOL FENCE: - 1-11" 5O POSTS B 6'. O.C. a WITH STEEL CAPS - I" x-I/2" TOP AND V V V V M BDTTp1 RAILS N MA:ANRY B" CL FILL - r, V A U J SIB" 50. PICKETS f4" MAX OPENINiI AL WALL FILL ALL CELLS SOLID W/ GROAT STUCCO TO MATCH BIILDWK. EXTERIOR 0 0 0 v ac. VERT. a N' CENTER IN CMU _ }F 1.1 j� _ AND HOCK INTO FOOTING h n v V n v n v n V I H L- 4 W �R 4B^ f. TOP f BOT HOOK (DRIERS 24". TOM ' - - - FINISH GRADE !21CWRSE6 BELOW j, ll t, fi f1' GRADE � a4• �. s cavr MASONRY POOL WALL 3 AND FENCE ELEVATION SECTION A -A SCALE: NTS -A At<a , osTeuvP x".. LANDSCAPE CALCULATJONS SITE AREA 4111 sf- SHNI BEDS: Low water Use (Kc 2 evgJ 35621 ef. Moderate water use (Kc 5 ave.) 41,186 s•f, High water use (Kc B evgJ 1451 af. LAWN: Reaeatfonal lawn (K-1) 5155 T. Trareftlonal/building zones (Kc_1) 14,148 eI_ FOWTAINS (2) (Kc 12) 81 a-L (riot Included In landscape area) PERMEABLE AREAS (non-Irrlgeted), Putting Green (artificial over gravel) 23e,4 e.r. DaterlLTon 5a 1n 4123 e.f. Decomposed GranRe/Redc areas 102135 .1. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 125035 el, % LANDSCAPE AREA 30.4% % LAWN AREA 163% PLANTING DESIGN APPROACH L Planting design shall utilize predominantly drought resistant plants with ImB drought resistant plants being mostly limited to the Budding Entry Zone and areas reoefvfng mc.tly shade. 2_ Law areas shall be Irmited to the TransRTonal and Budding Entry Zones, and area. For active and/or passive recreational me, Hybrid Bermuda turf "I B. Used 3. Plant. with similar cultural requlraslaas shall be placed together Ingroups_ 4_ Trees shall selected and placed to provide shade for partung areas, driv aisles and outdoor patio areas Used by reefdents. 5, Trees and shrubs shell bei placed along property boundaries to provide a buffer between adjacent properues. 6. All refuse enclosures, transformers, above ground equipment etc. shall be so -red with evergreen plant eleterfal per Cfly or La Oufnta requirements. IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH I. A permanent automatic underground Irrigation ay.ten shall be Installed for area. or the project. 2. A "2-wire" system will be proposed with electronic multiple -program capabl controller and rain-sernor. 3_ Drip Creation shell be Used uherever feasible and exclUsNely In Ule Weter Efficient 'Drip Zone'. Trees shell receive multfple enftters or Be on a separate z irrigated with bubblers, 4_ Separate frreatfon hydrozonee shall be designed For plants with similar cu lural requirmmte and by solar orientation. 5_ Areas Irrigated with overhead -irrigation Mall have matched precipitation rated nozzles. Nozzle selection and heed placement shall provide for maxli efficiency with minimal overthrow onto paent vemand adjacent areas. Low a nozzles shall be uulTZed to prevent wind -throw and check valves shall be uuliud to prevent low -head drelmge where applicable. 6. Overhead Irrigation shell utllize pop-up heads excluelvely- PLANTING LEGEND SYMBOLS BOTANICAL NAME SIZE/COND. sesre'� 4 III r_el'>-rr THEME TREES COMMON NAME REGION 6-LOW DESERT rpuene tfpu 36" box NOT RATED -ASSUME Tipu Tree Standard MODERATE Phoenix dactylframa Bare root- C.TJ4. 12-16' MODERATE Date Palm 0 WashTngtonfa FTITFama Bare root- C.T.H. 6-12' MODERATE �:3 California Fan Palm (CA native) Stripped trunks CANOPY / SHADE TREES Oiuercus euber 60" box 4GW Cork Oak Multt-trunk Proeopa glanduloea 'Maverick' 24" box LOW1 ,�r�yyy Thornless Honey Mesquite (5W native) Standard Parkin. -a 'Desert Musam' 24" box LOW' UT Hybrid Palo Verde (SW native) MuIU-trunk SCREENING / ACCENT TREES Acacia aneura 15 gal. LOW Mule. Standard Chllopsfe lnearle 15 gal- MODERATE Desert Willow (GA native) Low -branch Legeretroemfa 'Muskogee' 24" box MODERATE r-� HI Gape Myrtle -lavender Standard Lager.t-seria 'Glendora LLdm3e' 24" box MODERATE Gape Myrtle -white Standard Pa rothamnue epinoea 15 gal- LOW Smoke Tree (CA native) 9tanderd Tra ,arpu. Fortunel Bare root- C.T.H. 6-8" MODERATE Wrndm 11 Patin Chemaamop. humflf. 36" box MODERATE Mediterranean Fan Palm Clump SCREENING / BACKGROUND SHRUBS e all Alyogyne huege10 5 gal LOW Blue Hfbiecus Arbutus unedo 'Elfin King' 5 gaL MODERATE Dwarf 91trawbc 9 Tree Caeealpinla mexlcAn. 5 gaL LOW Mexican Bfrd-of-Paradise Eleegnue purge-'Margirate' 15 gel. LOW 8ilverberry LauccIoNllum frutescens 'Green Cloud' 5 gaL LOW Taxes Sage Nerfum oleander 'Petite Salmon' 15 gal. MODERATE Partite Selman Oleander Plttosporum tobira 'variegate 15 gal. MODERATE Variegated Tobrra Tecomarla capensle 5 gaL. MODERATE cape Honesyeudcle ACCENT / MEDIUM 4 SMALL SHRUBS Agave americans mediopfctm 15 gel_ LOW Medfoplcta varfegated Century Plant Euonymue J. mluoppNia 'Varlegata' 5 gaL MODERATE Variegated Boxleaf Euonymus Gardenia jasminofde. 'vefichli' 5 gaL MODERATE Gardena parvifolia 15 gal. LOW =eraloe Rad Yucca Myrtus commuis 'Compacta' 5 gal- MODERATE Dwarr Myrtle Nandlna domestCe 'Compacta' 5 gaL MODERATE Compact Heavenly Bamboo Phormlum tens. 'Maori Mefden' 5 gaL MODERATE Hybrid New Zealand Flax PTttosporum tobira 'Crane de Mint' 5 gal. MODERATE Dwarf Variagated Tobira 1 Ponfca granatum 'Nana' 5 gal. MODERATE Dwarf Pomegranate Rephlolepte fndica 'Clara' Incchhan Hawthorn 5 gel. MODERATE Rose floribunda 'Iceberg' 5 gaL HIGH Iceberg Rose Rosmarinue orrfcrnalTe 'Irene' 5 gal. MODERATE Rosemary Ro.marfims offfcfrelle 'Tuscan Blue' 5 gal. MODERATE Tuscan Blue Rosemary Selvle leucanths 5 gal. MODERATE Mexican Bush Sege Serra artemisloldee 5 gal- LOW Feathery Samna vh6SQR lilj„ll.° Daniel Roachmhitea U HAWTHOR * 1� 3150 Kettle Carol SF, Salem, Ors9on 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP l £O£CAL1 P 503 399 1090 F5033990565 wMnI1yehbdv.mm 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suile200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax(360) 213-1540 l 1` 13 12 11 10 11 PARKING STALL SHADE LEGEND & CALCULATIONS . PA —I- STALL AREA COVERED BY TREE SHADE ^ ❑ PARKING STALL AREA COVERED BY CARPORT OR GARAGE, PORTION OF PARKING 9TALL151 5HADED BY TREE TREESYMBOL NOTE- REFER TO SHEET A-5 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES. I i PROJECTED TREE CANOPY GROWTH AT 15 YEARS SCALE: 1 " = 40' 9+df7Jw."4iV.+1C�.P.Q IT•°FFSuIe'. ar eNr Lanc sec(,y},+y, nh 50R OF PARKING STALL AREA SHALL BE SPADED BY TREE5 AFTER 15 YEARS GROWTH 5, 3 MAX. OF REQUIRED SPADED STALL AREA MAY BE COVERED BY STRICTURES MM p.w.ceaG eses.naE.C,� .TIC. 20 40 80 120 TOTAL AREA OF PARKING STALLS. 10,121 5F. 50R SHADE REOUIREMENT- 10A635 SF. 13 TOTAL 5HADED AREA PROVIDED- II859 SF. (511) PROJECT NAME: LA Q U I NTA SHADED AREA PROVIDED BY TREES- 6901 SF (6Tf,) EDE EM E 0% 5MIN, OF REQUIRED AMOUNT RETIREMENT COMMUNITY 5HADED AREA PROVIDED BY STRUCTURES- 4985 51-(48.) — — REOUIREMENT- 50 MAX. OF REQUIRED AMOUNT SHEET NAME: NAM SHE SHADE PLAN EXH1WDATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 14 OWNER ( DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: _ 503 3"-)M FAX; 1 503 399 D5fi5 f ARCHITECT.- Daniel Roach Cal #33282 upr9ure �� 34 ��-" •' Of[hlt8(f Daniel Roach HAWTHOR ADDRESS 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM,OREGON 97301 TELEPHONE: 4Q3.394•IDPD FAX: 1 503-399-0565 N7; 11•p-°4-� 3150K°�C�SESam'won97301 RETIREMENT GROUP REVISION: P5033991090 PS033990565 wlent)�hlactu 9310 NE Vancouver Mall or, Suile200 r^ Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 A—ya (360)213-1550 Fax (360)213-1540 _ — 7 of 3i5 'no '00 'oa 'oo 'o,0 'on 'O.o '00. �0,0 ''oB 'e:0 'D.D Oa a ,e 00 'CA 0.0 '00 '00 '00 •0D '0.0 'on '00 00 '0a 'BA '00 '00 '00 '0.0 '0.0 '0A '00 '00 'DO '00 '00 '00 'D0 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 '" �00 '0.a 00 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 'a0 '00 00 '00 '0D '00 '0.0 '00 -'00 'Oa 'OD '00 '00 '00 '00 �'00 '00 ba 'Nr aA bA as h0 a0 bA U b0b0 b0 00 W '0.0 bA ba by 'as '" to 'do Cs a/ aq aA '0a '04 b0 ba as in ba 'm aA 'm 'Do bA 'ad ba a0 bo 'm ae as as bo be Its 'cc 'Oa 'ad a0 •eq '00 be no .0 'ot 'OA a9 'm 'O/ -6A an a" ", 'Ina 'so 'm 'u '00 bn 'a➢ 'no 'am 'am by '01 'GA 'RA aA b0 b0 'aA a0 '60 '00 '0- bD 'On a0 '(la .aa U "Go ba�Yo�yypS�-p- 1. ba a0 an b.0 as is 'm a0 be aA bA an a.a aA •OA aq 'm '9➢ -09 'm 'm 'm '90 'so '9A 'aa 'a0 'q0 'aa 'm 'aq 'qa `.30 'OA '0.a 'Oa 'OQ '04 'to •a0 '00 'to •a0 "00 'Do 'do aA 'm 'aA 'm 'as 'oD aA -bl We. 'Oa 'm CA be '60 'u `Ga` ''40 '0., '0.1 l01 �*_0q'a 0' YA W)i- bo hD 'OD bA "CA 'Do 'so 'to "am an 'go as as 'v0 "oo 'Do '04ao 'oo 'ao 'AA 'aa '04 30 'Do 'm -an 'aa '00 •sa 'Do '00 'as 'ad -m 'DO am 'Do b.A.lan 'aa bA 'aq aA ba as bA 'at '00 b0 aA '60 aA b9 a0 'ad b4 'a0 be '00 "on 'm a0h,t'.'a1 'al •OA1 �!'y� 6r a as as b0 a0 b6 by bA bA 'me bW nA 'so ao 'am by bq '00 bq ho Do 'no as a0 to '06 'OR a b0 b4 'm '40 'so 'a6 :aa •00 '04 b0 'oA Oq bq 0.0 '1F"m as 'ao bA 'm "of '00 'Dv as ba ao 'm 'on 'a0 by bn IRA. .aa 'a 00 A a0 '0D as hl ! Y1' No 'm bD -00 '01 'oo ba '04 'ao 'Dv a0 'M •Oa a0 'aa •ea 'q hp� 6��]3 'an lop Rho '00 ae 'a 'as '60 he ba a! ba 'ao 'Oq [an bl U '06 'aa aA by '04 it 1" 'AO 'An 'm 'm ha 'Do '00 b0 '00 ap 'm b9 'ea Q.9 '0/ a0 OA1aq a0 a6 bQ as aD a,l �•0! '�� a.l 'm •a0 'Otl '0a bd 'OQ '0.a a0 'OQ '9D a0 '0a 'QA b0 '09 0a AQ aI, a�'pp, "/a a6 'ae 'oa 'ae 'ao '0D ae 'oa -an 'atl 'm Ian 'ea 'm aD 'OA by •Ol "m as 00 "Oe '00 'ad 'a0 b0� 'do '09 pA as 'Q0. b6 'AA aD a 1A 'a9 'In "m a%n GO '0A o '63 'Od 'q.l aA 'aa 'aq aq 'aa 'as 'Do 'ea as bq btl 'DO •m 'm 'so 'CA ba 'm 'a9 as 'On '0A '0.0 'OA ba 'Oq 'OA 'no 'Oo 'Go 'u "m 'Oa. 'Do' 'a0 a0 qD DO ba "0.a�.'aq 'm 'so 'Oa ae 'a0 bP bII aA-KeA �'a6 bA .aA GO 'R6 bA 'IA 10 'a,C ba am fF bl -0 '&N'T \ as .� bl 'so 'aa b0 aq 'a0y .'�.'W bA b0 00 aA •04 b0 a0 a0 '00 'm 'pq a0 a0 aS 'At '04 a0 b0 'do '00 '00 '03 '04 l'00 as 'so ba do 'so '0.a '90 '04 '00 •oA 'ov '0,0 '00 '00 'Do .., t ,y� f 'OQ 'eA bA a0P'aa 1.0a \pa a 'LO aq an '0.a bA a0' eb��I bl %0 •a �/'1 ' 1 'al aA :Lp 'aP' 6G' ya aq as 'On 'go a0 bn 'on ao 'ao bD 'DA ba 'a0 'a0 'pq 'm 'Do 'go 'ad 'Da 'a9 'so 'do a0 as 'Do a0 'as aq ago a0 '� L'01 'On 'so /7a 00 bD 'OL aD -Ae. WI `Oa 'm 10 as '00 'Da h0 as '01 •9r )OD •0.a '09 '04 bD as '00 'CA b0 '64 'do 'aq as bn 'so 'aF bn bq 'wo '00 aQ ''Do as 'ao 'ao *am 'aA aA '06 'at 'ad as "OA •0A 'so '\u '00 'so '00 be 'as "40 '00 '0 'OR ba U '00 as a9 'la yal 09 bA a� as a! \h1 a1 h1 "ep '1 'is 'vl I '00 '0o b0 ba b9 bA 'Go bA blr tia 'so ba 'Bebq by be 'Do' b➢ bn ha as 'so bD bn bn 'an '0.0 a0 as 'e4 44 a0 'OR 'e0 �'cc •00 '00 •04 'oa 'O.D '00 1 / 'so '0a� b0 as as bA av 'm 'm be ali� na ee "5-'D,1 + 7l '41 �' a2 al bA 'ob a➢ 'aa he 'm aA 'aa b.e aD '01 L'i16�7e0a-•'d9 h ?5p� o 'ao 'oo 'o Iraq "00 'ov oo en b0 "as 'aa aA 'at 'aa 'ov 'va 'Do •Do 'aD /q� '@a '0 bA 4o pa "OD 'Ds aA ti�-b'3 'Do bA ad 'i%.�' � .•s �'0., 'a 'r3 .0' '7 :la. - '1} - "11a-•a.'-•�""Ca 'b0- [P-aa'�P aO-•aP�aP''o>D✓'0r--4EP--aO-$IF�aR� as 'DO aD as as 00 0.0 ��D 'q0 •00 •q0 •0.q 4D 'a0 'oq � '�•bD aq 'Go 'e0 'oa 'Oa 'Da ba aA (S0 '4A 11a-0.0FbA_h'E�OA •ao b0 h9 'AA. '9a � Pub a1 41 1 -'a''i, ]I ''i .mil F n _}Lr _ •aa-."D0� 3D•'06 aq 'go a•-A1 'me 'so lob 'Do '*a b6 'aa b6 'ae 'co 'pa,�'m -oa 'aa 'aA 'so 'm 'av 'on ba ai ''��� 4 ao bl7 be � r8 rl, $.i- vl 'Do '0., a., ar '0 -'.1 '14 fa '1 I '1.t ! as at OR To 1 �'or Oq S1e ae � oq V. ba 'm 'm ka 'so '00 'so "so ba 'aa /Oo "on 1'0-0 'oA '00 'aA 'm bD 'm 1 J .y F atlfyp/d. '�s ae 'm 'm '0n ao a0 I �6 a •I '+.L' - oa '0a 'm - ao oT' .'q0 'ep "Dpa¢a`; 'm m oD '00 'Da 'oa 'm an '0.0 'aa n faq aA pv 'a.e bA '04 an a4 28gN',�0.0 'qo '0.0 A 14 1 T - .1 'Oq 'So 0..", pe O�r� ;0D a0 OA 'q0 '00 b0 00 '06 aD aq aq'oq'a0'0aaqb0 enp U e i} (Two Story) -- 3e591 Acres (Two Story) atl �a a0 a ''0.0 V.o '00 '00 l t a{0e L� '1 rs YI r '1Crb - T a,001 q ' o ao 00 'qo qv a0 bn ao �'aa •ao 'aq •a� 'Do bo -00 OITr ilolyI'00 _w+�Sq 'o0 '00 'ao a �1,11t •, 72 SUITE ASSISTED LIVING - - D, .q., � •Da, an ,QA as •ea 'a9 'ae "D9 •a, b,. 'ao ae bq '00 'eA ba QD •AO l j .r . 0l0 d7 10 j�3 1 ; 0 (' Lj1Vfis. 1� 1 'oa 'oe 1 as D oo -00 -00 'aa 'I. 'IT ' A h1 -T� rA (Two Story) RESIDENCE Aq�t, A1�', t Ta an •as 'bu aD ea a6 •a6 •m •aA '60 'm ba •m a. aA 'Qe 'nA aA 'De 'a6 'oo 'ao as �\1,oa We '00 -00 -oa , bA iA' r.1 /(J.,/IA 0 }► '1 1 One and Two Story') aq aA '02 '9n iL.ol'1`•P`v O 10.0 ae 'Op ['jqe 'an aq 'q9 '00 WA 'Oa •09 '0o ba 'm '00 a0 '00 a.0 1\oa 'o\.a�i.aLOo .+j0.1 + TI 'Ts ` J '4[ 't ,. 'fie v 0 -40 --- 1 aq a0 ' a( qn .'C q ao ba v9.YJ}p a9 aq '00 '0.0 •60 as a0 'OA 'aD 'on 'a0 '00 '00 'a ` a4 'i01� of '6 'o] a ba ai 1 'IA 7 '1� n •a a 'aD 'oo '00 'oD 'oo Ia0 a1 1 �// 'DO too ea 'aa 'ao "OR 'oo '00 '9a '09 'aa 'a0 'ao ae -04 'Po q Ir(I 1{ '00 '00 a a •m '�� 1 .yLi-Y aA bl b1 a�Ll '1 -•1T •la '0. T 0_a0 .a.l '90 ql bA �4a. a� tP In� D ai bQ 'qQ aq 'an 'm -Oo -09 -Dq 'm 'am 'an 'm 'Go '00 a l\ 1 r.- Al 'no '00.� bA I 1 as •+ -- moo.( a5 W of •afI •fa '1.7 'jA .da al '. Q1�L •ae jan 'q0 'a0 'qa 'qA 'qq 'qn 'aq iv 'ea 'e.0 'oe 'm 'to 'AA '00 00 'oo '00 an l m '1 'D + -i- Y'r. 0 'ai�•a7 ai S.I 'u 'Lr 'i1 Vi� b.l al 'm "e aIL. '0.+ c' -0 lom '00 '00 '00 btl Y➢ 'no 'oa. W'?§ '06 "0o 'so 'so *06 ao '00 �'oo 'oo h!U' 'n�_ L pia '0 • iAt ' T• I'IA ' n 'a ' a^IS it } T a] �i i .'o.l 'm q a0 I 2 ap a 1 F aQy[P IDA a0 bA 'Ds •aA a6 •ae -a0 '}ap/'�'Do 'so '00. -'aq 'aq 'aa as '00 'OA '0.0 ` F1i If -,yT�-+A-� '� J�: �'S 'W 7 Op .A a 'Aq 0 •.0 a I p [oo 'no '00 'o.a b0 'oo '00 _'o.a TO +00 '00 '00 A. A. '00 '0,0 00 '00 '00 a,D y �m , aT 1,t r7 q �i _A r • iAa a ;a }o.D 'DD 'Da 'o.a 'pa 'D.o 'o.o 'oo e'o^'D.D 'o.o 'o.o 'o.o a.o 'o.0 A. 1 I IF �� 1 1 '00 '00 '00 I94 Ipq ' G 1 'ai 1 '1.7 0 �'7 'rb1 _ f, ' ' ]• ' 0 0 fa 0.0 '.o '0.0 0.0 �A.a '0.0 '0.0 -'Oa 'O,P-'o.o 'oA '0.0 •a.0 'a.a '0.0 V: II f4� l 1 '00 'Do '00 '1 A a Tr 1 1 .T 31 is it YA '32 r 110 'OC .aO r0o ''1 un ao '00 '90 '00 as b0 '00 poi-Oq -Ra -oo 'On -0, '0al 'DD hn as 0.7 '7 },a 3e la AI 'as '7.S �- 1 as av 'eo 'qe 'OE' 'eo '0a 'go 'so 'oo 'Co '00 'm 'v6 'aa a0 •Dn 'on V '00, 'no h0 '00 1 a: '1 '1 'aA i 4.a 07 '1.1 `4a Ya iA all ht a0 (One Stogy y) b ," v rag ad bl 'to •ea '4a 'ad 'on 'go W'OA 'as a0 'ea '44 aA '0.a tl '00 '00 J00 '00 r F r F� I }t i.7 0 �'i � }A S7 1 •Q Al 0. 'a➢ 1 '00 ae '00 '00 'm 'so '00 •a0 '00 '00 '0.e 'am '0.0 a0 '00 f,( r 1 'Oa '00 'oo -.A p + 'm 'a1 Y It $1 '6] '!a -Y i + 0 bA IeA aq 0]] Im 4a '04 'so 'an 'so 'as '00 '4A 'so 'Do '46 'oA 'ar.. '00 '00 'oo 'oa '00 pi l 'm b sx T 'r!) 1.7�'rA 'u 'Ls 'll 'l7 1 ao bq I r ke 'aa a�e ee 'aA '07 'ao 'ao bq 'm "Ro *do 'oq -ff4a be '0,0 '00 -00 '0a 1 2.1 .1 '1.2 11•'1.2 '09 '.0 1.6 b.5 '13_. '1.1{' 'aA .1 1 bD--^Al0- *so •aA 'm q 'oq 'D.a o.0 'a,o 00 �Q.o�-on 'a.a 'O.o 'aa 'o.o 'o.o 'o.a 'o.o '0.0 '�o Vo ./ ` [Two Story) I �/ 'ao 'oo 'o.a 'a.0 t 'A Ss 0.7 '1.3 A.2 .o '09 '0.]�'.9 '+ 'D9 9 0A O i •D D [Ia Ia.D 'Dd 'V.-_AA__D.D 'D.a Ra 'DD 'o.o 'D.D 'a_a 'b.a -D.D 'D.�.D joo, $1 {'p / Ill '60 no '00 ja0 � I I q -3.e 1/ 1. 'Dl h7 a1 a7 bA I "0 0,0 IO.O o.0 00 '0.0 'o.o a.0 '0.0 bq 1A,0 '0.0 '0.0 'AA 'p.o 'o.o 'a. .a 'BA! '60 5.0 'u u 'L! ae I 'o.a � bA ti-'oA o -1a100 a.6- AA -0.0 'o.o 'o.o 'awfio 'oo I� qq I LLJ 'oo 'oo O.a 1 P n I LI 1 1 a 'z.e '+i ("1s �L•i 'J.1 ,1 1,9 aA aA la. ' A Y3-�' + a1 aA 'o { _ o.t �Il.a 'a9 -'0.0 'oo 'CA 'on 'o.o goo U.o 'o.o 'a.D 'O.o 'oo 'on 'Lo 'o.o -- (Two Story) J -T,lS '00 '00 Do o 1 '11' 'T 41 an bT 1 bA aA a] a7 ki E.] 1 a0 oa v IOa 'oo 'a.�_'o 6- 1oA• �'o 0-'oA 'ao 'oo 'oo 'ao '0A 'oo 'Q0�'o 'oo I 'oo 'aa aAa a a { LO 1 'Ci .,]Il` T 7A .. 1 'L aA -11A as a7 al ':a y1 ff� p0 '4.o--'DU 'D,a 'o.o,'D.a 'oA 'aa 'oD 'oo 'DD 'Do 'oD '�D.0 'oD '00 'op a p II I �Y 'I,l '+ \ s ..I 'fA 'Qa 'Ql a 'a, a] a= ' r 1 'ot b+ 'o+ 'o+ 'aO 'o.O 1y'33 a!` dV' I jI �/ '0o ,>oa s0o9a 'DA 'oo 'oo-'o.o 'o➢ 'OO 3oO 'o.o Vo '90 IMP '0a '0:0 ' �Rp �'00 'm '15 1;16 '23�� c,.'4[. '3+ '2. '15 '+2 '1.3 '1A ' '01 'a2 " i 'D+ a, '6a '40�7�'-a) ^ ry a�D '1)'aq ,$/ L 0 b:o b.o 'a.a 'oll 'D.o 'o.o '00 '0,0 'oa 'on 'oo 'oo 'oo 'oa 'oo B. '0.a v bd I'm Il ILI •5b - 'T/ '22 •2B '3.2 -24 '26 '29 a,7 •Da •94 a.7 ''di. •! 'a, 4/ LKFC as •a ' /0 0 00 T00 00 00 'oo 0,0 00 '00 '00 '00 10.0 '00 '00 _ (9 7 SUITES.;. 'oA be 'u � u 1a � '(!1 ' 1 a➢ ., a 1 r S 'a9 oa--0v-''os;=ao =aa 'aa,'oo 'aa 'aa 'oo 'aa 'oo 'oa 'oo goo 11 ,a -oe'g o 00 'g hp bd - 'To 1 S 'T3 aF a,7 / ' s a a ad bD 'oo 'oo 'oo 'on �'oo 'oe 'a.a, 'oq `o:e 'oe 'oo 'oo 'oo MATC UNtod� '00 al De D - . 1D '1 0= • ,. 1 , '1�'; ; FACILITY I b a 'Qo aA 'aa as `A Am bA aM,m,T H41N '00 �'00 '00 Qq 'On a0 '01 '0. f '1 A T,0 '! 31�1.iP--L6�'1s '1.Y '< ,. .f 2 ' " a -1 a l 1Am a pe. 'oo `i.O 'o,11r. L.o a.U' "a_o 'oo 'aO 'oa 'o�"'o:o p ( ne Story) »1 '00 '00 a/ I a A F bo al A ..S '1.4 '1.2 '1.3 9 1 1 1] 3 0 3 '2.4 A 0 13 7�' 1 ➢ �ff '00 'Oa '00 '00 'OA 'OA '00 '00 'D.0 '00 '0.0 '00 '00 '00 '00 Zy �z-� ,I ,t ,p LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol L" Oly Calab9 Number D. 01oal Lamp Fie Lumens LLF Watts RECESSELIGHT AT ONE r a -AFG LITHONIAWSLIF GIECASTIALUTEPMINUM ALUMINUM FLUORESCENT 4HM13DTFLL 9D0 005 2241 m HOUSING WING WITH VIES LOUVERED DOOR LITHONIAWSTM MINWTURETRAPEZOID ONE SA -WATT COATED G 29 a F.G. SOM MD ARCHITECURAL CDl] CERAMIC METAL WSTM SOM 3325 061 AS SCONCE, SO -WATT METAL HALIDE, MEDIUM HALIDE, HORIZONTAL ROS MO es DISTRIBUTION, MYDROFORM REFLECTOR CLEAR • FLAT GLOSS LENS 11 RECESSED CANOPY ® 2 19'AFG RUUD MRC4IT LLIGHT 150 WATT MH a." Ms 14o0D 1 011 211 GOT AM LGH {'VERTICAL ONE 0-WATT COATED NI 35 B A F G 50M HRW FFL DOWNUGHT, WHITE tD17 METAL HALIDE, LH14369 es M. 0 BS 60 FAINTED REFLECTOR, VERTICAL BASE UP ® iOW METAL HALIDE Pea TAMP -MEDIUM BASE, WITH FRESNEL GLASS LENS AND WHITE RECESSED DOOR BVH 100M 120R7 Or HID LENSED ONE IDA— COATED ® N2 a 14•Al.q. 0L4 DOWN LIGHT WDHAL4 TRIM ED17 PROTECTED METAL HALIDE, BVHICAM12 O 1]] BL41a ]90a ads Inn VERTICAL BASE UP POS, ® 01 0 9'AFG. SEAGULL LIGHTING ID'DIA CEILING MOUNT 11)13W GUN CGLC IES 900 a.346 0925PKE-16 ® 02 6 9'A F.G PROGRESS LIGHTING IF,— EI_ 14-DIA CEILING MOUNT (2)13W DUNCCLC IES 900 005 14S AMERREl *ALL M TED S O4 33 9'AFG LIGHTING 3000 rIXT (1)13W GU24 mwURE s n100W ie[2250a 085 65 i1 9 zt'-6-A.F G. LITHONIA KAO 260M R3 ITS IVaa Laminae, 250W MH, R3 ReO - 1u1 ONE (1)250 WATT CLEAR HT21 PULSE KAO. OOM_Fi3 085 297 Ra 9A1M START) CuloR Hpusezitle Slidd M HALIDE START ETA{ HA HS PULSE_ _ _( POW 'F P'91€Of3q [PULSE MEETS THENIE LAMP IN HORIZONTAL START)ee FRIENDLY CRRERIAERW POSITION i2 / 21'-6-A F G KAD 2EOM IRSA IpULSE START) a Rv, 2 - MH, _3 eReOeclor, F.1 ONE WATT CLEARR BT2T20 PULSE KAO 250M R3 22500 0 &5 2B0 (20'POLE WITH -6- POLE BASE) CuIafl MEETETHE NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY START METAL HALIDE WAP W HORIZONTAL JPLLSESTA an res CRITERIA POSITION i3 1 21'"A FG KAD 250M R4 HS (PULSE START) Area Lumnaire, 25M LIH, R9 ReIle An.Fu1 ONE (1) 250 WATT CLEAR ST21 PULSE KAO_250M R4 22500 005 280 (2O'POLEWITH Culoll, Hweesee S START METALH .1 HS_(PULSE_ POLE BASE) MEETS THE NIGHTTOAE LAMP IN HORIZONTAL START)— FRIENDLY CRITERIA POSITION BVF 1132TRT V LENSED DOWNLIGHT ONE 32-WATT TRIPLET ® U1 In 9'Ai.r MVOLTfiLR9 WITH WHITE SPLAY, rRESNEL GLASS LENS TUBE COMPACT FLUORESCENT, 6VF126TRT- MVOLT 6LR4, 2400 085 36 VERTICAL BASE -UP POSITION a LITHONIA DMW! AFT WET LOCATION TW032-WATTLINFAR V 13 70'A". 32 ENCLOBURE WI1 H(2) TB. FLUORESCENT TO]35 DMW_2a32 ies 2800 085 Sol (AMPS, 5a%DR HIGH IMPACT ACRYLIC LENS LIGHTWAY PWXI WALKWAY- ONE 11WATi CPF• W fib 2'AFG 9POSTMOUNT /LOURESCENT FLUURESCENT 1vW—la 1200 O05 1H O O LANDSCAPE LIGHT MOUNTAT21 ATION ONE1TALITTCLEAR E[ ONE50-NACLE, W1 2 fi'AF,G. LITHDFIIA FPECIFI ILOODICATION iF1_50e1 TA 3300 095 61 ® TFM SAM TA PSTRbLw10N.3rrffAlsL HIMADNTALFO5ITION res WI CLEAR LAMP 3PECIFICATIDN ONE ]UWATTCLEAR E[ W2 I 6-AFG Lmcd*A TFM ]OM RG FLOODLIGHT, RG DISTRIBUTION, ]OW MH. -1]METAL HALIDE, HORIZONTAL POSITION TFMJOM_RG. es 5700 095 95 WI CLEAR LAMP IlOM1wM'rl o1T1IAX16-310'HPOST 42- ONE 42-SCEN CPF i 9'A.F.G. liAM,TAlM1'Y1 TOP FURURE WHITE FNE CENT TRZP IES 3200 005 4306 O O IH'POLE FIXTURE REFLECTOR HOOD CLEAR TEMPERED HEIGHT 1'1 CLASS JAR LENS ' �' °camp Daniel Roach°rchitect HAWTHOR #•rf �..a H, ' 0 Oil\'," 3150KettleCourtSE,Sakm,Oft.97301 P5033991090 F5033990565 wkWtyarditectunnown RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mail Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 OF 2 NOTE- REFER TO SHEET A-8 FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS. SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 1 F`_ ON 0 15 30 60 90 �D➢ '¢}l1DA I 1 I � 7 '1� - '7- �P.] '22 '28 •32 '24 '26 '29 i bt o4'Do j! 1 I' b 'tJ '•TM • .r •i_f J,iat 1 06 __- - 4 1 Li�I ,111 - ` D. DD 'D1 a )S 'u T i�t}]y 7 -ail i / 'Ix'- ar ha y Iq -Do 'O.OIn 0 'm V.a "oo 'Da 'qz y l __•2 '12➢:IP 3C '• o 'li 'n r 'J •1A h 1 }j-r -a '00 '00 b/ '9AO W i Y a n0 1 bP b1 '11 'U •t.� 'f. ! Jf Yt a a '1] ,1oo oo 4 'Do'oo 'Do 'o,o '� YS v D ih �t _ ' I 1 e 'no 'D.D ba �4 Q to rrp" 4w A .. 1.� a4= 't 11-IS3[ 1.> \ _ o-+/ • "u 'DI 'a� 1 'Do 'oo pp7l)f�'Ja � 1a 1ti.Ka1.a5 '1 'lll a.7 a It 1:97tili '00 4{ ' / •0.t 1 1 ?f 4.1 } DJ a :' 6i D \'I } '0 o e ,a- f(I 3.5 fl r+ by b Jrm by I 9.1 G. 'DD "Bpij q7y $!, VI or ®rrpcaL aFc �j ✓.86 ACreS 'OD 132 SU • �Dq • •D •A ITE RETIREM- T d lh) •, 'a.D 0 +`ye ba � � o�rot h es 1 '➢ d astt• y:RESIDENCE 'D.o �u •.r` ,'- vvv - (Three Story) ar ) ', 'I 1, ,Do 4, 'aA, Is 'Do 'off ' D ']0 'a0 'Do III '0a S1 'I '1.1 -a.a -y.o -Do 'o�'aA Pi - `'1 •u u _ !. ii '7• 'ii '.t U at 'a° bA Ya DA•� 'a° .1 bo'D Da Dq �0 IcaY'rY �- I D, ,'• 1 q f sty/t.fi 1.2 1.1 1.0 'I.] '1s 'In /'o.o 'Do 'oo 'Do b.0 ba ' b.l L , - a:7.. at 1 'to bs �I \ 'oL 01 DD Ea b0 'GA 0 D roa bd V ai '1 �A" /'21 ~� -V Y.1 '111 '22 124 bA .. 4D Dq DD bA 'v`!• 1v�4D rot `7 ••='Ls� 1 D 4A ' ,r . ' ,r -.}� � },t -u 't 'a) DIP b 4 a bt 'OP I /j 'a Aa 'an 0 v D rov`roq'-aai�4]�1._- a 9 b 01 0 b.T-111�' YI. j",6 rA /f '7., A 13V % V bA bA 0. ba 'oa bA �, At 'at, -N1 .0 -Do -oo i,l 4 '0 0 ba DD 'da'. D6 0a Da�` be 'al � t 'a1 'V 'it ' S M i 1 Lacy DA '0.R*LLD bA ° DA 'me b .]t➢ 1°•a 'DA, bew �i.t 4.1 'zD ''B 'oA '0.Q 'OA\.Dq be 9 3a 'na 3a qa "vq\pa h, -h.i y) ~°. It by Ia, all 10 ba h9 ➢ 'Do 'oo 'oo 'oo 'oo ' o 'D, YM k9 'i(I a 'T I ' t. Is U, -go 1av 3➢o w b) b ho P.o Is 4b`IA ht •'1•. IS '1 ',e ,a ba / .6 ' A as bt 'm amba bn aA 'aatiha ba he a 7Le hr iu h 'a➢ h➢ 'a 'D1 ` 'u v r roa '04 ;GA ba to %3 'oil 'DIP 'soU 40 i s ba ' 'aA as bA A bit e Y 1 'd] 4.r ';A i I-1 D11 't ba bq DA rov 'm Dp ' on 'D I. ba bA bo b.D h1 b 9 I •" •Li +1 Ss S{_ KA Jhr �i� •'. u IF ` f 1 Dq Ina 4q Is ba ha baw .a bA ba A 'a0 'o0 '00 'D.0 '0.t ' d 'a '1 '1 ^2 'Yt '>�] YS' i 'I bA L1 'Do '0o 'oo 'oa 'o.a 'oo 'aa DA Da bd bA • ba ` LA 'oo on 'oo '01 u 9a v I _ �� •�' ]t '1 'Lp\ t ba bD b6 '00 Dq 4a ..1 bD Iva I 3 Dn DA D 'oo 'oo 'ip 'at 'o 'ate �' Y}�1 � "��i I hl 'u 'as 4o Da lea as De 've�'Pa UDa bA bP 'Ps as 'oil 'a 'ambe be DD bd 'ot 1altDa s �'ID 'yl 'u ', /, 2 Y 'aa 'aa 'cc 'CA Ica Is roD ba .v U Inc. -bv bA IA is a bal 1e aq D "aa 'to by v it cl :9 •%,q. 'o, T� a7 bt rot/ s 'vA D DA DI 'aa Da DA "aa aP 'aA ro➢➢ DD ro➢ 4D ba Dt�'oD DD ha D ba b0 bD Is ro11 + 'o •. 'PA b6 b.a h VU}I �'/r A 'a)� DD Dl a-0 '04 DA 'aA 'm b0 bA bA 40 'am 4A 'am bA 11D -kb en 1DD ro➢ hD ba ba zv�'°➢ Da: 'vo 'a CL e � •°l f 'ar \A ` P loryl C itt0leb d tIft)a 'cc 'ea a➢ ad b0 'a6 D \bP Is bq bq. 1sn �' as b 'm eD 'Da as . 'm `aq •m D.+I L91ng 2 'al DA De by 'Do qq'�n 'ca ba D 'DP by be Ds by 3d\oD ba roA halba c° Yo ba \\ a v roa he be ' o bA h m as 'va At ba ISC'7I %j;aa*) If 'DO ba bA bA 'aA bP -04 b� 'a► bA bA # OA •DA -so h!1 "°A a9 L 'lP b° b0 FD bA~'�o 'OR bn 'cc 'm Is '00 bD 'to DA roa '00 'o DA DA DA I000 roA b► •0: `l �bA b6 bA ba �➢,0 -01 4a 'so %A hA III is " •u be�bt '3a �w if e1� f :a f DD Da roD '0D >>D m rol 'oa hD 'aA b4 ro/aJoo 'aA 'm rol 'a 'Do 'm 5m7, ID 'cm as ' DD hD D roa 'Da 'da he an 'Do 'm `m ' e 'Da 'oo b.1 �bd ha hA 'm Io ae 'CA aA bt 'DA Io Yd b/d illy as h➢ DA I* 'at 'aD 'on 1xv 1+3. aA hP aA 5w ' aA e aA bn aD 'aD~'aa DA 41 dA b0 b0 hD DA ha '94 'Op `haa " I '04 40 'do 'oil 'm ' D DA DO b0 De bD DO 1t bD DA Da beC.➢ 'es is b➢J roA b.0 I. \_'at SA ba l 0.0 aP '00 b1A b0 '00 DO 10.n pa DA DD bA DA b.0 'ILA bD bA I 'm 10.0 4A bA� •OP b.0 bA �0.0 "DD b ,Di4 .0.0 4A\ OlP 4D 00 "D0 -Dp `4Dn DA �l IS D b0 bP bD ¢D a0 "DP %Y 4a bD Da ao 'co 'pa 'go 'm aD DD bA 'at De roe ha R -it Da b\- so b `b� as bA hb.\�bn br 0.p bA bn\ 1.4 . 'm Da aA bD bD 'm 'Oa 'OLD/ lea '0A ka lla 'va ha b-a ba 'at 'vA DA 'm 'D➢ "CA 'va hD 'aPm 1W 'ne\gyp 'Da 'na'D➢ a0�bo 'm Dv 'm Da D. ' n IS to 'Do roe �reD DA 1 /°11 Dn hq 'M roP Id I.I. rot ba '04 '" ba 'Ra '00 'm 'od 'aa Do 'oa b� D0 I, 'aa�bo oA bA bA�4�q aA 'eo � Lf h 'a°� 4D Do 4a "PP 'P.a PD bA bA Dt bD bA ba 4.0 b0 '6A '00 'OD 4D DA ID ba 40 "oD 'vI DD ro0 DD�'aD DA %o 'a3..4a Is `0 Dq 4D� D roe DA roa"faa /6e 'a6 Da \ ` 'oo 'Da 'oo 'ao 'Do 'o.o '0a 'Do 'Do 'o.o 'oo 'oo 'oa '0.0 'oo 'Do 'oo 'Do 'D9A .o '0o 'oo 'Do 'oo 'DA 'oo 'Do bA b.o `Lo -Do -u D ba bo 'D� bA bq 9y 4A 'PA ao�'P�D 'ad 4P L-+. / - -aI-1• [ 'aA D a 100 'oo '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 00 'no '00 'OA 'Do 'oA '00 '00 'DO 1 ! SU!TE_7 ba gaol 'o.o '0.0 'o.o--b,o 'o.o 'a.¢ 'oo Vo 'Do Vo Vo 'o.o 'DS 'oo 'a.o MEMORY CA 'Do 'Do 'D.o 'no, *oo 'o.o 'o.o 'o.I 'Po -a.a 'o.MATGHLINE D n0 ro0 '00 '00 '00 00 'DO '00 '0,0 -o.o-DO 'DO 'Oa -OA '00 -00 '00 FAC.IL.lTY I b. 140 0 A o0 '0,0 '0,0 '0.0 '0.a -'00 -00 '00 -PO 'Oa '0.0 'Do '00 -00 '00 Iq 0 .B o0 'a0 '0,0 'OD 'oa '00 '0,0 '0,0 'Oa '00 'Oa 'Oa '00 '00 00 4__ '00 'ap �q �.o 'oa -Do'oo 'oo '00 'o o 'oo 'oo 'oo 'o a 'D0 'on 'Do 'Do 'OD 'Do 'no *rD �O.A 'DO '00 '0,a '00 'oa 'o0 'Oa a ° m 00 00 oa'ao 'o,o 'oo '0a 'aq 'oo 'oa 'oo 'ao 'oo P 'Do 'oa- `oo 'Do 'Do 'Do 'oo 'Do 'Do 'Do '00 'oo 'Do 'Do 'Do a 1 a 'aa 'Do 'Do '00 'Do '00 00 '00 '00 '0a '00 OA 00 '00 -00 20 A E° 'Do- 'Do 00 '0.0 =0.0 -'pa 'Oa 'Oa 'oa '00 'a0 '00 '00 '00 'Do r S, -P.o 0 �a '00) 'oo '00 'oo 'oo '00 'oa '0.0 'oo 'o,a 'oa 'a0 'oo '00 'oo b9 9'i �a 'a0 'U.0 lol'DD '00 oo 'oo 'oo '0a 0D 'Do 'a0 '00 'on 'DD x 'oD 'Do Vo 'Do 'Do '0,0 'a,a .'b.o 'Do 'oo 'ao 'aD 'oa 'oo 'oo 9.I '0.a-_Vo--aP-'aa -aD *00 'Do �'0a 0.0 0o '0a 'Do '00 '0.a 1 a '4T a A '00 'ao 'a=o 'oo 'Do 'On_'ao 'Do 'oo '00 'Do 'aa '00 '00 '0.0 0 al ] t ,-^610 0 'aa-� -do 'oo '0.0 'Do 'oA OU-D.a •oo 'ao 'aa 'oo t4 �a 'O.a 'Do 0.0 'o.o '0.0 'd0 'OA 'Di0 16a '00 'a0 'oo 'o0 'a0 '00 1 - �✓ 'D7 PS II 1 a 'Do 'Do '0,0 `Do 'Do o.P -0,0 'OA 00 0.0 '0.0 '00 00 'Do 'Do T 05 D e I 6 'Oo 0.0 q.0r;p0 '0.0 O.a '0.0 ,r. ,DS 'Do '0.0 '00 '0o 'Oa '00 ai I 4 '] f •I] 0. roll 1 10 ID II.. -a. '0.0 '0.0 'Do 'o.9 'ao 'Go '0.0 'OA '00 '00 'Oo '0a- 'Oa 0,0 '0o 'Do 00 �0,0 q)-00 .00 DA .0. 'DO -a. 'o0 1. ro 'Ltl i 1i rf •'1] rotl A 'aa '00 '00 '0,0 '00 '00 '0,0 uA '00 '00 '00 'DA o0 '00 '00 '00 A 'tA 'Ia 1.1 '1 r 6 'Do 'Do 'Do 'Do 'O.a 'no 0.0 - ¢o `on 'oo '00 'Da 'Do 'Do Q '00 'aQ oA 'aa =00_ '00 '0.0 '00 '00 '00 '0.0 00 '00 '00 '00 'a.a 'o.o v 'oo '.a 'o,o •ao�'oo no on 'oo 'oo 'Ra '00 •L rr D 'oo a.a ,'pll.o 'oo '0.0 'o.o 'oo Irfoo 'aIo 'DO 'o0 a 'oo r] �'a 11~'11 "1t '1.1 '11 'LI 'LI`as a o 'on 0.0 O.o joo 'o0 'D.D 'Go 'Do *o.o 'a' 'Do 'oo 'o0 'on 'oo 1 4. 0 fD '00 '0.0 '0.0 DD '0.0 DD '0.0 Q)'a0 '0a '0.0 'Do=ir►ieo 'oo J 1 'ta 'D:a Joo--D.o 'Do -o:D �Da/'aD o.o 'o.o 'o.o '0.000 'o.o DUPI�X '0,1 '0.1 J.'On '[0 'a0 '00 '00 'D1 'oo wIo '0.0 'Oo '0.0 '0. 0,0 '0.0 7 C [ ,,.A is 'aD 'A ,,s o a e r 'oo 'Do 10 'Do 'Do 'oa 'oo- _'0.0 'oo '00 00 'oo '00 'o.o 'oa 'coo 'Oo •f 1 11,'.CPlyl - ') Eilu (din^, •1 00 'oD 16 'oa 'Do -o,o 'oo 'ao -'os '0'oa -0.0 'Do 'o.o 'o.o w ICA 'oo 'o. 1 'Do 'oo D 'no -'d0 'ao 'oo 'o.¢ 'oo '0,0 S 'a.o 'o.a 'o.o 'oIyo 'o.o • /at 'oa 'I. d J 1I '0.1 'Do 0 'on 'Do 'jaz 6o 'to Do 'so 'to ao '00 'oD 'aa '90. -oo 1 3�1�.--1� - 'a5 '0.4 : '0.1 'Oa ' D '00 '00 'AQ "0Q 'm '00 Qq iR"'Oq '00 '00 0.0 j0 '0.0 ro ro 0.3 0.2 'o.l roo 'Be '0a 'D, 'D. 'a0 0 a0- o0J1'.0•�A 'ao 'Oo, OA POa ba QA 'DO '00 '00 'DD '00 'ol 'aA '0.3 0.2 4a DO 'Do 'no O,0 '00 •Io '0.0 '0o '00 'a, 'o.o_ 'aa 0.0 'Do ro0 'a0 'Oa 'a0 00 '90 -00 'at S '00 'Do 'on 'Do 'Do Is 'as � D 'as �m _+a. 'OA 'OD '0'UQ '00 'aa *,L0 00 00 'DD 1 a 1 00 '00I 0.0 '00 'la *oo *Do, 0,0 'DD 'no -Do 0.0 'Do -15 Va 'Da 400 'oo 'DO 'oo e 'oa 'Do 'is '00 'o PZ'aq 'oo 'oD 'on 'oo 1ad oo 'oo 'Do 'ao 'oo 'oD 'ao G J _ 0 Iek I 'OD 00 'la 00 '0,0 '0,0 '00 00 'OIl 00 .4�•a➢ '0.0 '00 '00 '00 '00 '00 Cott e F t ro+l'Al 'Do 'oo 'IS 'no 'oo 'oo 'o0 'Go `on 'Do 'oo 'oo 'o0 'Da Ion 1 Stor au IIJills bq 'D6J'PD 11 hO 'Do 4? 'an D6 jo Isa to hQ Dn'X'do='o.p- 'oo 'o.o 'oo 'oo 'o.o /( 'so Lam 'a6 -oa-0 -oo -ago `o,o 'oo 'ao 'aa 'o,o 'aa 'PP 'o.D 'oa 'ao 'ao 'on 'oo 'am G A ID, Da;q➢ I. 'm by Pq 'o 0 0.o Vo- _o o 'a.a %Q 'gA 4 bA `o.o 'Do 'oo 'Do 'D o 'on ��// bA 2 IT 'q°, �v9 'DO '9a 'P/'I 0a 'm '00 0`JI 0 'b,Q '00 'DO O 0,0 -.a "me '0.0 '00 'OD 'oo 'aD '00 I '&I a0/ pO 'cc 'a➢ Yom '00 0D 'o.0 bAr -a$ '00 'OA 'a0- EOo 'on 'so 0.0 -0.0 'OD 'Oo '00 '00 4D 40 .54 . lala 'm 'a. Is 'o.o 'oo 'a.o 'oo 'D.D 'a.a 'So `oo ro0 0.0 'o.o 'o 'Do 'oo Vo Is .Da 'am DA 'Go '66 'to 00 'Da "so 'DD 'm 'oo "so ba 'o.o 'Do 'oo 'oo '00 'o.o I 'ao la f Go-lle0e 'm bq 4a oo-Do -b.o Vo bo Do '9a 'QD 'a.D 'm 'oo-Sol 'oo 'aa 'oo 'Do 'o.o ror 3 'YO 'OV 'm 'am '9Q '00 'So 'Do oD i0 b0 'cc 'QA 'a0 'cc •14 'O.a 'Ob 00 00 '00 'o.0 _ U ^ o 'QD 'cc DP *so 'to 'oo 'as oo '00 'as 'Go 4o 'OA 'to 'Go 'Da VD, 'OD 'oo '00 '00 'eo Dq he 'cc 'a° 'a° bo 'oo 'Do '.3 2.o -16 to It -am ae -am DQ 'Do 'a0 'aa 'oo 'oo 'eo Ic •D➢ a0 Is to It, 'a➢ It •dLL 'a0 'Oa '0.0 'Go 'a0 '9A 'cc 'm 'oQ '9a 'ao 'Go 'Oa 'on '00 '0o ADD ba 'cc bo 'oo 1D6 be 'ce ae 'oo '0a 'oo 'go ae 'm 'oq "aa 'aD Io 'at '0.0 'o.o 'ao 'oo 'ao 'oo 4D bo a➢ 4A ba '00 'OD 'so 'Go o0 rot '00 '00 %Q 19 '9D "DO '09 'Do '99 'Oa 'DO '0,0 'o0 '00 '00 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE SYmbd L.DII Do, Lalabg Numb« a.Ira[In'.1 Lamp Fie Lumens LLF Watt. D 6 1.6-AF6 UT.-WSLIF RECESST No ALUEl MINUM DIECASTIWI ALUMINUM FLUORESCENT FLUOREONE SCENT 1111213.-L 900 B 1247 m HOUSING WRH VIES LOUVERED DOOR. UTHCNIAWSTM MINIATURE TRAPEZOID ONE 50.WATT COATED G 29 9-A PA MD ARCHNECURAL E01]E, WSTM 50M _ 3325 OAS a5 8CONSOM T HDR:ZONTAL HALIDE, HDRIZONTAL MD es METAL HALIDE, MEDIUM METAL HALIDE, POS Q DISTRIBUTION, ORM EFL C R REFLECTOR CLEAR, FLAT GLASS LENS M ) 1141A RUUD 11-11sr L12- RECESSED CANOPY' IGHT ISO WATT MH MRC417 kxs 14000 O05 215 GOTHAM LGH 0•VERTICAL ONE 50-WATT COATED Nt 35 ■AP.a 50M BRW FFL DOWNUGHT•WHITE ED17 METAL HALIDE, WI43fi9 Ne 3400 1as a. PAINTED REFLECTOR, VERTICAL BASE UP 10 5DW METAL HALIUE Pea LAMP -MEDIUM BASE, WITH FIR SNEL GLASS LENS AND WHITE RECESSED DOOR ® NZ t 19'AFG aVH uvM 12012Y BL4 D"HID LENSED DOWNLIGHT WITH BL4 TRIM ONE 100.'NATT COATED ED'7PROTECTEO METAL HALIDE, SVH 100v_12 0 2T] BL4 es loon 0B5 120 VERTICAL BASE DP PCs ® Os a rAF.a SEAGULL LIGHTING 0925PBLE•15 10'DIA CEILING MOUNT L1113W GU29 CCLC IES 900 OBS 345 ® 02' a FAFA PROGRESS LIGHTING P3762. EBWB 14'OIA CEILING MOUNT 12113W GU29 CCLG IES a.39 .0 5 04 53 aAF'A AMERITEC LIGHTING 3D00 WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE H, 13W GU24 man 1- 900 0.1 65 T1 1 21'-fi' A PG LITHONIA HAD LITH R3 HS Area Luminaie, 250W MH, R3 R.B . 2 OW ONE n)250 WATT CLEAR BT2B PULSE KAO 400M R3 22500 085 297 pO'POLE WITH •6" POLE BASE) (PULSE STARTI Culoa, Housesck"W MEETS THE'NIGHTfIME START METAL HALIDE: LAMP IN HORIZONTAL. _He (PULSE_ STARTI ias FRIENDLY CRITERIA ROB ON a T2 a 21'-6'AF,G (_ E S R3 IPULSE START) MH, R3 ReXaclw,SW Arsa Lumi�ua I , FA ONE R 25DBT2 WATT CLEAR BT29 PULSE RAO_25°M_R3 22500 0D5. 200 t20' POLE WITH LUIOXMEETS THE HAUDE STARTIN PULSE_STA •6' POLE BABE) NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY 111 INTAT LAMP IN HORIZONTAL RTIM= CRITERIA POSITION MD M R4 H5 Area L4 , 250W WATT IS A FAG IPULSE START) URDLSE RO MH, R4 Rellecl«, Furl CLEAR BT20 PULSE CLE R1 T2 HAD 22500 085 2BB 120' POLE WITH •B-POLE SASEI CuloX, HousesWe Sb'�tl MEETS THE NIGHTTIME START METAL HALIDE, LAMP IN HORIZONTAL HS_(PULSE_ (FULSE4 START) vs FRIENDLY CRITERIA POSITION III D 9'AFG 6VF 1132TRT MVOLTILR4 6" LENSED DOWNLIGHT WITH WHITE SPLAY, FRESNEL GLASS LENS. ONE 32-WATT TRIPLE' TUBECOMPACT FLUORESCENT, VERTICAL BASE 6VF 1 IITRT- MVOLT 6LR4i III Oas- 36 -UP POSITION LITHONOIDMW24Fr WET LOCATION TWO 32-WATT LINEAR V 12 10'AFG 32 ENCLOSURE WIrH(2) TB FLUORESCENT TD,]35 DMW 233 ¢s B00 O05 Sfia LAMPS, 5D%OR HIGH IMPACT ACRYLIC LENS O W fiB I "II LIGHTWAY PWXL IPOST MOUNT WALKWAY- FLOURESCENT LANDSCAPE LIGHT MOUNTAT24" ONE 13-WATTCPF- FLOURESCENT IaMscaee res "So 085. 1D WI ) 6"AfG LITHO IA SPECIFICATION FLOODLIGHT, TA ONE Ea -WATT CLEAR E[ -11 METAL HALIDE TFM=TA 3300 095 68 TFM 50M TA DISTRIBUTION, SOW MH, HORIZONTAL POSITION bs WI CLEAR LAMP SPECIFICATION ONE70-WATTCLEAR ELR T W2 1 6"11.G. LITHONIA FLOODLIGHT, RG -17METAL HALIDE, TFM ]OM RG 52DO 0a, 95 TFM]OM RG DISTRIBUTION,]OW MH, HORIZONTAL POSITION Ms WI CLEAR LAMP LIGHTWAYTRZP 21'DIA X1fi- S-11 POST ONE42-WATTCPF- ® O W4 7 Sr AF.G (B'POLE FIXTURE HEIGHT 11 21-U-1T42-2 TOP FIXTURE WHITE REFLECTOR HOOD CLEARTEMPERED GLASS JAR LENS FLUURESCENT TRZP.IES 3300 0B5 43 en 0.31_r1 Daniel Roacharchitect HAWTHOR *Jy IonD 0.•Y--„ tit M50Kodle Court SE,Salem,Ore9Dn97301 RETIREMENT GROUP :lf (ALA P5033991090 PS033990565 w1entyard1tedorawla 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2 OF 2 NOTE- REFER TO SHEET A-8 FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS. SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" III I- FAT`1 0 15� 60 90 TYPE D WET LOCATION STEP LIGHT _qI TYPE N1/N2 HID DOWNLIGHT TYPE T1, T2, T3 PARKING AREA 20'-0" POLE / 21'-6" LUMINAIRE HEIGHT FROSTED BULBS TYPE V CARPORT CEILING LIGHT TYPE G WALL MOUNTED LIGHT TYPE 01 CEILING LIGHT TYPE W PATH LIGHT 2'-0" POLE TYPE Q LANDSCAPE LIGHT TYPE Q2 CEILING LIGHT TYPE W1, W2 FLAG, SIGN TYPE M RECESSED CANOPY LIGHT TYPE Q4 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT TYPE W4 PATIO uGHT 8-0" POLE FROSTED BULBS TYPE T1, T2, T3 PARKING AREA 20'-0" POLE / 21'-6" LUMINAIRE HEIGHT NOTE- REFER TO SHEETS A-6 AND A-7 FOR LIGHTING LOCATIONS. PROJECT NAME' LA Q U I N I A RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: SITE LIGHTING DETAILS EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT N3 For SPECIFIC PLAN 2001.055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER. WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: 503 399-1090 FAX: 503 399.4565 ARCHITECT: i Daniel Roach Cal #33282 _ Daniel Roach°rchitelt HAWTHOR ADDRESS HIGH SE, SUITE IO SALEM, — — -� ���"� SALEM, OREGON 97301 Cy3xu u e:-:.RETIREMENT GROUP TELEPHONE: 503399.109p FAT(: Orxxr 3150 KWla Caax SE, Salem, Oregon 97301 r . OF Ca4% P5033991090 r5033990%S wleNryo mecWre.00m 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 REVISION: Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 E —$%I 11=4m. 10 ce 36 South Rers r � 041aWW[H Daniel Roach°rchitect ¢-y [alto * * 471 High Street SE Sulte 10 Salem, Oregon 97301 F5033991090 F5033990565 OF CdVS SE Perspective on Seeley Drive PROJECT NAME: I LA Q U I NTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: PERSPECTIVE FROM SEELEY DRIVE EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 _ TELEPHONE: =)399-1090 FAX: L5031 399-0565 ARCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 e q q y ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 �� 0\, /n` gvn`l/ N�'D f] SALEM, OREGON 97301 S RETIREMENT GROIP TELEPHONE: M-399-IM FAX: 503349-05d5 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr-, Suite 200 REVISION' Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-154 0 —A-9 11 a 3f, South Perspective on SeeLey Drive _•.-..- ,.fin` - x - %It hu��tri 1 IIf t 4111161 :1 WJW%.Jl ...': SE Perspective on Entry calH. Daniel Roachwchitect 1 A . i T T f._1 " NJ, IMr U-y-11 F 471 High Stree[SE, SURe 10 Salem, Oregon 97301 RETIREMENT c���OUP •� F5033991090 r5033990565 �F CA4�F 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 °ROJECT NAME: �; LA Q U I NTA I RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ;HEETNAME: PERSPECTIVE FROM SEELEY DRIVE -XHIBITDATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 foi-SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER /DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC kDDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR. SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: J5031 399-1090 1 FAX: W3 399-0565 4RCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282' _ 4DDRE55: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGON_ 97301 _ TELEPHONE- _ 1 FAX: 503-399-056,5 TE IS*N:- — - 1- - --- - —9c 12 of 36 n 7ND FLOOR V' oov o 5 CO PARAPET WALL TOEQUIP. BEYOND a v o no __ o v o oo© mo 0 �� •ice;.. .�__�. �ff7, 1 11,17 Min POP= =Z M ELRun will will 0 0 0 0 0 0All 1110 0 0 © o o vo >v© FRONT CORE ELEVATION ~ / SCALE: I' = B'-O" (TYP ALL DR -S TH16 SHEET U—) CORE ELEVATION CONT. *E��K e'-O" (TYP. 4LL DRLLG'S TNI6 SHEET LLONJ MAX. PARAPET a" T UPPERUPPER P� I MINII-I3'U4 PARAPET 3-m" 4 r v .. n lND FLOOR V I5T FLOOR j V 9 s 6 C BACKS CORE BELEVATION I(.. Daniel Roachmhitect HAWTHORN 3150 Kettle Celt SE Sakn Oregon 973M RETIREMENT GROUP p 503 399 1090 r5033990565 w6.11tm ft turecom 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 )JECT NAME: _ ET NAME ILA k-q U I IN I H RETIREMENT COMMUNITY RETIREMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS 161T DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 'NER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN MMOPµENT LLC DRE5S: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 _ :PHONE' fI fmal399.IM FAX: 5Q3 3"43565 :HIiECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 DRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGON 97301 s � iP>tER oawP>:T P.S.CAPE-, (Il 10C_ n iND FLOOR _ 1�FRONT CORE ELEVATION SCALE I'= 5'-0" (TYP ALL Dd 6 THIS SHEET 6ON ) `BACK CORE ELEVATION CONT. V ALE I = E'-9" ITYP, ALL D�'5 THI5 SI-EET 'J.ON: UPPER PARAPET 34'-d Snvlr!ur PARAP'cT� 33'-0` yl _:Oc�q n 2,1D F,CCR v� 0 15T FLOOR CC�� S AC_KCORE ELEVATION o c i PROJECT NAME: LA QUINTARETIREMENT COMMUNITY 'A .B SHEET NAME: RETIREMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS e, K E1111 AMENDMENT 30, ENT 1/ lenity AMENDMENT N3 farP E NT LL PLAN 2i]01-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWIFIORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 architecture VANCOUVER. WA 98662.8210 °w TELEPHONE (so31 399.190KEYPLAN .503 wBiw3W39 M0565 wW aFAX: 503) 399.0565 ARCHITECT: 00,141 Roach Cal 93M t 0.>•tN1e0101 Daniel Roach°Fchifed ADDRESS: 471HIGH STREET SE,SUITEIO HAWTHOR SALEM, OREGON 97301 - TELEPHONE: 503 399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 f'rvc n,r a`, 4T NgftSrreM SE,SWte ttl Salem, Oiepon 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP P 503 399 1090 r5033990565 REVISION: Of CAL1 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr, Suife 200 i� 19 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 0a (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 �—i d OF 36 1 F4-1 fil 1-3 pA& BETdd7 h'P mf m BEAST WING ELEVATION C SCALE :"= B'-0" (TYP- ALL DRLG'S THIS SHEET U.ONJ KEYPLAN rer rral'E9)DOLORS 0 = F.— HEIGHTS PER RAN 1 p I = STUCCO SIDING 6L1D�1tlL COLOR- ICI •40566 "AUrW 3 BLU5H" (269. F EFLECTIVITYI = STUCCO SIDING COLOR: ICI -A0 "ELDO O TAN" (&I% REFLECTIVITY) --c' SIDING ' COLOR: ICI •A0664 'NATURALLT CALM" (44% REFLECTIVITY) = STONE SIDING COLOR: CARAMEL COUNTRY LEDGESTONE(ELDERADO) d VINYL FRMIED INSULATED WMDC W/TRIM COLOR Menufeclu.e:: Mid vel!ey - Ak—d • F'RE-MANUFACTERED ALUMInIUM RAILING Lwj COLOR BLACK 0 r —ING COLOR BROLLN METAL g❑ PTAC COLOR TO MATCH Cyp( 4E COLOR - TYP FLAT ROOF - O. MANUFACTURER SAFNAFIL RL r ENERGY5MART TAN ROOF = TRELLIS - NATURAL WOOD FINISH LW - +cis --=-- _—iEms.—ssrx ::rr= .— ..r_r,.• —.r 1 II�11� I Nis L_.,_- IIIlII� I ■ ■IIIII 11�`�i - - I 1= - -I_� _I I I 'a—= 1L o© W AM v v o OFSOUTH WING ELEVATION 7cue r. re'•�' rrra ru.L omw•s ms s.eer uow rr,'�SOUTH WING ELEVATION \ -- / 5C4LE , I"= B'-0" (TYP. 4LL D—,l THIS SHEET LLONJ t ITT PROJECT NAME: LA QUINTA — M�� Moil � RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: RETIREMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS p EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER / DEVELOP . HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC Tift ADORES; 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 o 3. s a L"J a a e a a TELEPHONE: ^503 399-IM FAX _ 399-065 ARCHITECT; Daniel Roach Cal #33282 Daniel Roachu,hitect ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 " mKnHAWTHORTELEPHONE: 503-399-ID9D FAX: 503-399-0565 • 3150KdtbCaltSESaWnGrew97301 RETIREMENT GROUP r� �F CAtt� F5033991090 F5033990565 wbMlYvciNxture.com 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 REVISION: _ _ j l Vancouver, WA 98662-B210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 13o,30 s L�goe iT v. J.PFa Pda.irRT , " �EAST WING ELEVATION (E s ?LE u, Tina S-7 ,'- SOUTH WING ELEVATION F' - r_'— SOUTH WING ELEVATION GT E7 ! SQL—E - - , '� lenity plw"411 architecture s, e# .t _. 0 471 H'gh 5t-t SESuite 10 S.! ,n, Oregon 97301 �fi' ir,ti��° P5033991090 .503399OMS WMityq—P.com Daniel Roachmh)1ecr 471 H:9h street 5E, 50te'!0 soVzm, Crcgan 9T�01 r5033991090 FE03399 OE65 �A.. a Q KEYPLAN T r$r WJrE61C/7.OR4 • PIRATE r��III .e1G.T8 PER R.w SM - SIcCu:tO4GY tit .- T-'LE706 '.GyTy"N CGLGR .C"AC46] ECpORA.'�TAV' y$SSri CtlLGRK 'dC664 . S:CAE b'G'tiG ac_aa. cede m COMM' S+ Lr. E6Tp:E rELC�CApp/ .'� . v1 4 FR4 _p ]tlk6Ylp ��sW 1� W_m K 4d rd I . 4+r•W CLl"G,2 GCGVH'i'4 LeCl/J4i'a 1AC CC rR • TP ..a•. la FLAT EaBR:n d'AR1 '4t ,. TppLLi6 PROJECT NAME: LA Qj U I NTA L - — —- —- RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: RETIREMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 7ADDRESS: AMENDMENT#3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 J OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC k� 9310 HE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 _ VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: (503) 399-1090 FAX: (503) 399-0565 ARCHITECT: ' Daniel Roach Cal #33282 11 1' tl AA RE-TIRLMEN T (,. ROI.JP ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGON 97301 503-399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 REVISIONI: _ A I Cc 6 of 36 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 PARAPET 34'-4" LO'JIER PARAPET l� V' n 2ND FLOOR V' n IST FLOOR r L WING END ELEVATION HWALK . V- 6--11- rT P. ALL P 15, THIS 51,EET uOW WEST WING ELEVATION $TWISSHEET u UPPER3 LOWER PARAPET v n 2ND FLOOR STIST F� BEAST WING ELEVATION n SCALE = I"= B'-0" (TYP. ALL DRUIG'S THIS SHEET UOfL) BEAST WING ELEVATION SCALE : I"= S'-O" fTTP. ALL DRIK'S THIS SHEET U.ONJ N 7 'L� H ra32a ✓f axe .:. n.n � KEYPLAN Of CALM Daniel Roacharditect HAWTHOR9�) 3150 Kehl. Caurt 56, Salem. Oregon 973M RETIREMENT GROUP e 5033991090 e5033990565 t Isnitprdtatlrecom 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360)213-1550 Fax(360) 213-1540 ICE, MWfffiM Xo1%6 1❑ PARAPET HEIGHT$ PER PLAN 11= STUCCO SIDING COLOR: IGI •A0566 "dllnli'xJ 51-06H"1111 REFLECTIVITY) 18 1 STUCCO SIDING M��••\J4 COLOR IGI •A0661 Wf61% REFLECTIVITY) TAN" fc REFLECTIVITY) 4 = STUCCO SIDING COLOR ICI •A0664 NATURALLY CALM' `AA% REFLECTIVITT/ I O 1 • STONE $IDMG \Ca COLOR CARAMEL COUNTRY LEDGESTONE[ELDERADO) Q' VINYL FRAMED INSULATED WINDOLS W/TRM COLOR Ma .1urar: Mld valley - Alnord O. 1"IGS-MA4IAGrE3�P 4LiCNNtOY RAfL ROLC9 - �•• COLOR BLACK 0 • A-'- COLOR BR— METAL • PTAC COLOR: TO MATCH BLDG, COLOR - TTP. MAC CIMANUFACTURER SAIR A 11_ - OLaT EN RGYSMART TAN ROOD Ftr I "TuRA�SIWOD FINISH �n4.Lh T ti '11-7 2ND FLOGR IS_ T FLOOR E 6 5 �- WING END ELEVATION acnLe . r•. h--m rsYp aLt olvPsa Turk 34EEr uou �I�WEST WING aELEVATION (_ uPPER/� __p'eaF T T3a _, �ILCUER PGeAP=T� n V' 2\D FLOOR lentyarchitecture 471 Hbh Street SE suite 10 Sakm, Oregon 97301 P 5033991 P503399 OS65 Wlenitygfaup— K EAST WING ELEVATION - hClv.E r'. 8-�' •^'?. 4_ GQS O'w�! } =ET YOV t�r07%W?*! I 0 i ,, = . - 7,. s• FLCC (4)"STmWING ELEVATION K9Y T1pTEl•CKG3� I:. PAWP[T w.. _ -12*- $ PER .t w C0.Olb `CI •AAdh6 '1rYT1P"N ' - dill}." •76A 4EaLEGTMrYP 3 P�pv�, C• A Yf�7 h G G Pi='I:VnLL• ��• e aT" aip:uc sin C1r m Gn1in L :&ANT tea: aye •Ec�elxrc�l A'S LATEG lK b is ' m I V lle+-4.atl u7] =PRE-zn*L><dGTEgiL 4.r^'-\V^- L C_16 L6 IL`Ya C,,�� OLwOL = iaY `IG C4 LC4r S4agn raET4 uN UG J fF . frec 6GLm TO `rnTCM SL Lrc [av - 1YP �]7liiii-1-40 .>vfi� PROJECT NAME: LA Q U I NTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: RETIREMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS • (K EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 w J \ AMENDMENT 83 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001 4055 �! w�K" OWNER / DEVELOPER:' HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC - v ADDRESS:' 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 w — VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 �, rxP u.a r1 apt . '✓ TELEPHONE: (5031399-1090 FAX: (5031399-0565 `X` KEYPLAN �F ' ARCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 Daniel Roach°rlhitect HAWTHOR ADDRESS: HIGH STREET SE, SUITE IO SALEM, SALEM.OREGON 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP PHONE: 503399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 an 1Mph s9eet sE, M.ro salon. Dragon 97so1 P5033991090 P503399OS65 REVISION: 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., SuK9 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 11 URRO." A r•ss:e: Daniel Roacharchitect 1 T HAWHOR •� eb ,: :,.,, ;* 471 N19h Street 5E, 5u1b I0 SOW, OM- 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP 'rlF P W3 3991090 r 503 399 0565 OF CA1.�F 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suile 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 SME TYPE SI%e: Sladn AI 615 A2 512 A 552 A 4].5 A 447 A6 406 A 57.3 AS 539 19 539 A10 404 All 477 Al2 429 One Betio m BI 549 B2 378 133 5-3 64 NI 05 5S0 B6 600 B] 594 B8 610 B9 9 BI0 612 BII 635 B12 6 4 B13 56.5 614 600 BIS 510 616 181 B17 539 BI8 01 B19 542 020 A' 021 574 B2'_ 545 B23 66 I'eo Belkaan CI 966 C'2 994 0 974 C4 966 CS 994 C6 1060 Retirement Bui ldi n First Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 16'-0" Ol��ONq C./7991 Daniel Roachorchitect HAWTHORN`� w -11 `t 471 Blyh Street SE, Sub 105d—, On!9o997MI RETIREMENT GROUP e 503 3991090 r 503 399 0565 �F Ch 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-0210 (360)213-1550 Fax(360)213-1540 Retirement Buildi ng Second Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 16'-0" _ a 311**V Daniel Roach°rchited t al�a2 * vxr n:.>..0 T— ♦ "I ligh Strt SE, State 10 Solem, Oregon 91301 .rf ti r 503 3991090 a 503 399 0565 OF CAL�E� HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr-, Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 surm nPE WE . ,$., A I .5 A 517 13 A Jn A .7 A6 NM 17 5 3 A8 539 A9 539 A 10 401 All "I Al2 119 One 0e,troom nl 5.I9 02 579 0] 111 H'I 701 05 580 116 600 07 5% 08 610 0H 9 010 61, 011 635 012 65 013 568 1114 600 015 U 016 - 017 549 018 611 019 2 020 542 IL'1 571 022 -a5 023 661 T—&&, , C1 66 2 MN C3 974 CJ 9Ui C5 9 C6 n 9 � A I I I I 0 0 0 I B= 7fl Sri � V . I 14, 1 L e I � 0 0 0 e a �e i Hatch Pattern Key Patio Area First Floor f i - Deck Area 2nd and 3rd Floor NIXIE APE NMI,. A4 475 AS 447 AL UL A] 573 \a 539 N, 539 \10 401 All 477 --- !0, ' Al2 419 n Jledrmm BII ` .. BI q9 57a ".\ B3 553 ••.� 81TOe`N 1 W ;01 B6 600 LONfW0:1 1 ;I ❑7 594 � BIO 61 II 63 B5 B12 64 BI3 MIN 6W BN 600 ]fit B15 510 BIL ]81 Bla 631 \ Ill,542 �1�r� Lla0 r' e' SM '•,'\ B-10 54? P -� B31 5 74 B22 Sty45 N p� B21 664 I,a BeiFawv Ap Otl � CI Wq C, 994 C3 9]4 Retirement Buitdi n Third Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 16-0" �.]3362 Daniel Roach°rchited HAWTHO N WC ... Ill 471High 5tRe1SE. SLIta105alM.OR9on97301 RETIREMENT GROUP .503 3BB 1090 .503 399 0565 OF �k�l 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 Retirement Buildi n SECTION 'A' SCALE: 1 " = 8'-0" Retirement Building SECTION 'C' SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" Retirement Building — R SECTION ' ✓' SCALE: 1 = 8 0' PROJECT NAME: SHEETNAME: LA Q U I N TA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY RETIREMENT BUILDING SECTIONS EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER. WA 9 1662-8210 TELEPHONE: 1 [5031399.1090 1 FAX: f5031399-056.5 0TLh11B(1 Daniel Roach ARCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 vc ptm9n.Kn ¢ au�u HAWTHOR TELEPHONE: SALEM,OREGON 97301 503ti399-1090 FA%: :.U3J'99-DSd5 -„ ," 4nH1090a SE5u1te1i,5olwn.0Mw97301 RETIREMENT GROUP RVASION- /Fp PS033991090 P5033990565 OF f1L� 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax(360)213-1540 _ — � — 23 w 36 s UPPER P� V L0 �0 3/4'R4PET V &D LNFLOOR 10' V IST FLOOR FRONT CORE ELEVATION_ M et4�e . r.1a•.r rTYr atL r�Meaaa rN1e e.lErfr uex7 ZIPPER PARAPET LOWER PARAPET n 2ND FLOOR V 15T FLOOR L`J ABACK CORE ELEVATION_ '9GW_E 1••16'•6' [YT'A-lY.L 6RV,C'6 TN16 6uECY LL�x.i (J Assisted Living Facility- Daniel RoachBrchitut n»m k 3150 Kettle Coot SE, Salim, Oregon 97301 Of [ALL P 503 399 1090 F5033990565 wiendywcHlecture-m NPPER PARAPET LOWER !1PARAPET 33'-B " 2ND FLOOR A O'-1 3/4" U KEYPLAN HAWTHORIZ RETIREMENT GROUPIP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Sulle 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 KEY MOTEGC0.GRS 1❑ • PARAPET ROCW HEIGHTS PER PLAN 2 SIO— • S-=OO - COLOR: ICI •d0F T11TWW BLUSH" 1261 REFLECTIVITYI E a • 5N000 SIDING COLOR ICI WA0 2 "ELDORADO TAN" (61% REFLECTIVITY) 4 •STUCCO SIDING COLOR ICI •A0664 MJATURALLY CALM" 1441. REFLECTIVITY) = STONE SIDING PAS COLOR CARAMEL COUNTRY LEDGE5TONE(ELDERd00) e VINYL FRAMED INSULATED WINDOW5 W-111 COLOR Marur—L—r: Mid -11 y Almond ALUMN IMANUPACTERED- RAIL ING COLOR BLACK r AIWING COLOR BROJ METAL • PTA C COLOR: TO MATG" M COLOR - TYP, • FLAT ROOF - MANUFACTUI R: 5Ard IL - ENERGYSMART TAN - E5R-1151 EG Al - - TRELLI5 - NATURdL WOOD FN•6W PROJECT NAME: SHEET NAME: LA Q U I N TA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ALF BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER; HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE_ T (50313"-1090 FAX,�(503) 3"-0565 ARCHITECT; _ ADDRESS; Daniel R( ac h C_d_M_ 33282 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM.OREGON 97301 _ S03JW-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 TELEPHONE: REVISION: -- -- — 18 24 or 36 UPPER _ n2ND BOOR _.__ • „ iwi . ■P. , ■, v�4^ n I6T FLOOR �i� •M1 -.1_• e a a a I- + A FRONT CORE ELEVATION SCALE : I°•li'-0' (TTP. ALL DRUKi'9 THIS 9UgET UANI UPPER P T Ln SUER PARAPET � 2ND FL 5T FLOOR a a + a + + a + 1 + { f + + + 1 in, ■ ■ ■ ■ -L M1 �� m1nIIN F � MITt r.-ITIi r,� r� r �: B BACK�CORE _ELEVATION I � I 0 iiiial W, aC AU 1 . F.W-ff (� ALL 4a * i area uOcil o] KEY "PTIES,Car.aKS • PARAPET 1000FHEr6 nb PER PLAN 1L STUCCO SIDMG COLOR. ICI 'A0566 • 11 BLUSH' (26f. REFLECTIVITIVIT TI S STUCCO SIDING COLOR ICI -A"1 2 'ELDORAD0 TAN" (61% REFLECTIVITY) STUCCO OIDING COLOR: ICI -AO664 NATURALLY CALM" (44% FIE"CTVITY) STONE SIDING Sul• COLOR CAPNM CgMTRT LEDGESTONE(ELDERADOI C VMYL FRAMED INSULATED WND018 LVMIM COLOR MaMracwrar: Mid Valby - Almb . PT8•MaMPAGTEN60 ALUM►AM RAILING. COLOR BLACK . AMMG COLOR BROIW METAL. • PTAC COLOR: TO MATCH BLDG AC COLOR -TYP. • ROO F OF - MAYIFACTURER SARNAFIL - FLAT ENERGYSMART TAN - ESR-1151 OIR PKXZ EQUAL TRELLIS - M• NATURAL Lk= FINISH PROJECT NAME: LA Q U I NTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: ALF BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 KEYPLAN AMENDMENT#3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 Assisted Livin Facilit OWNER /DEVELOPER HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR DR., SUITE 200 V_ANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE: (503(399-1090 FAX: C5031399-0565 ARCHITECT: Daniel Roach Cal #33282 lenty � ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 Daniel Roach°r(hitect HAWTHO� .• (.,Sf2ia � SALEM, OREGON 97301 TELEPHONE: 503-399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 architecture `,ru�.r ,< 3750 (aft C.n3E��a,�9T;o1 RETIREMENT GROUP _ _ _ _ _ .w3399HprysO PS503a�990565 wlo`�0arll a n ��OF(•Ai' � REVISION: r� 1 r3U3399 rU90 F5033990565 WkNryadilxtvewm 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suile 200 �� Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213.1550 F. (360)213-1540 FLOOR -111115T 1 WING ELEVATION I..i 5teLE Y• W'-rtt fTT P- OLL 01iuY'6 Tw5 GEET 00m UPPERUPPER P� 12' l" LOWER PARAPET -6' l\ IST FLOOR UERP n LOWER PARAPET to IST FLOOR V WING END ELEVATION .I P ALL ❑Fft6e Twe 3.nT IwHJ lC4E r.lr•-r• nrp. J.LL t�s TNI3 s�+EEr now UF'PEJ 1-10 IIII '.'I_II ... � 11111 111 1 f 111 1 IST FLOOR Q� WING END ELEVATION SCALE :"•I6'-0" (TYP. ALL DRl)s'S THIS SHEET Up1L1 Assisted Living Facilit Daniel Roach°rchitect r•n�u * . 1 ra+ �r•;. • I I , 3150 Keltle Cart SE, Sakm, Oregon 97301 � CALL E6033991090 E9033990566 wkMryordAectveaxn u...RAM. .IEwAob PER MAN I U.2 STllGGO SIDING Io COLOR ICI •d0s66 411rUMN BLUI (26% REFLECTIVITY) • STUCCO SIDING C COLOR: ICI •Am662 ELDORADO TAN" (61% REFLECTIVITY) a • OTUc o 5)09 COLOR ICI •A0664 'NATURALLY CALM" (44% REFLECTIVITY) • STONE SIDING $Ip'Nfa COLOR CARAMEL COUNTRY LED6ESTONE/ELDERAD01 0 VINYL FRAMED INSULATED WINDOWS W/TRIM COLOR: Ma raclure MId Valley - All . P'REJ1ArefACTEAZCP ALU� fWI�P1G LNG GQLML pLAL'.0 iWJViY • AINING COLOR: 15 O METAL • PTAC DOLOR: TO MATCH OLOG AL COLOR - TYP, FLAT ROOF - ❑• MANUFACTURER: - AN -ESP ENERGYSMART TAN - ESR-1151 O A 1lL CF EOUAL „ • TRELLI5 - NdTI1RAL WOOD FINISH PROJECT NAME; LA Q U I NTA MJQ I RETIREMENT COMMUNITY QA SHEET ALF BUILDING ELEVATIONS K E Y P L A N EXHIBIT DATE- JULY 30. 2012 AMENDMENT M3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER/DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: I 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 ll. VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE- 503 399.1090 FA%: (503 399-05G5 j r T T i ARCHITECT: _ ADDRESS• Darnel ROt3_Ch COI M2.82 1 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 H WH 0 OREGON 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP TELEPHONE: _SALEM, _ — 503 399-1m FAX: 503-399.0565 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr„ Suite 200 RHVISION: - Vancouver, VIA 98662-8210 — (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 -- • • •' - 2b � 36 UPPER PARAPET n q1E ; FET 7rID FL R PARAPET L*R PARAPET FIST FLOOR D WINGOELEVATION uA� UPPERUPPER FARA�T ` LOLLER PARAPET FIST FLOOR 19 6� 0 d WING- END ELEVATION E •,i n rnn.n n ✓.EY �WESOCCLQR6 F1 PARAPET RL HENSWT.S PER PLAN T • STUCCO SIDING �1 COLOR: ICI •a05LE tIVIT-) BLUSH' (76:t REFLECTIVITY) I s I COLOR,- 91D ING COOLOR ICI •A M 'ELDORADO TAN ' fbni RERECTINTY) • STUCCO BID MG COLOR ICI -AC664 (J % NATURALLY CALM' r44t REFLEGTINTT/ STONE SIDULS COLOR: GARArEL C�NTRV LEDGESTONE(ELDERADO) VMYL FRAMED INSULATED COLD. W?RM COLOR Me,ureclUer: Mid �--valwy - ati-d Rw+Llg3: [.aoR. al, rac . AUVMG COLOR: BRCWV METAL • PTAC COLOR TO MATCH JLO& COLOR -TYP. rrAc Le I • FLAT ROOF- MA ACTURER: SARIAFIL - PL.AT ENERGYSMART TAN - E51R-151 Oq RDGR EGU.AL n • TRELLIS - NAREL LWOOD FMIBH b WING ELEVATION 1 aca:-B "•u•-C- r'Yd. {LL DPJG6TuiS S+:E6'f uOx1 SWING END ELEVATION SCALE : I'•Ui'-0' (TYP. ALL DRJI.'a'9 THIS `. __ET VAN.) Is* F�arax Assisted Living Facility lenty olruL aral L•mikl Daniel Roach°rchited architecture r 50331090 i5lr.S03399100565 wMNtygnOlmm �7F OF CA41 3150 Kettle C-1 SE Swim OFNM 97301 r5033991090 r5039%0565 wNNryvcMtrtl� KEYPLAN PROJECT NAME: I LA Q U I NTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: • ALF BUILDING ELEVATIONS OWNER / ADDRESS: ARCHITECT: HA W THO R ADDRESS: RETIREMENT GROUP TELEPHONE: 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 REVISION: Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 4360) 213-1560 Fax (360) 213-1540 HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVEWA 98662.8210 503 399.1090 FAX: 5031 3991-0565 Daniel Roach Cal #33262 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGON 97301 503-399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 rxuu1 rLdi i SCALE: 1" = 16'-0" OWNER /DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT tLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE (S03) 3K-1IM I FAX-. M�ID.30.1rn �� Daniel Roachorchitect C333! * ilp ti.M�> 471 High Street SE Salta 10 Won , Oregon 97301 .� r5033991090 F503 399 0565 flF CA'. HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr-, Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 ARCHITECT:I Daniel Roach Cal #33282 ADDRESS: 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGON 97301 MUNITY 28 � 36 Assisted LivimFacility First Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 16'-0" .�A,mato'm Daniel Roachu,hited 471 Blgh Street SE, State 10 Sol m, Oregon 97301 u.n. Apt r 503 3991090 r503 399 0565 f OF CAL�� HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suile 200 Vancouver, WA 98662-6210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 AU'n ed Lining 1L Ill'. TYPE SIZE Stadio ,V 11" A2 410 A3 41a A4 CIS A5 396 AO 4" A7 509 One Bedro BI 545 B2 572 B3 572 134 6" BS 644 Bfi 596 B7 605 BB "0 CI 93, 11e qCw 9L'ITE TYPE SIZE Jul n7_•1• 321 1Z-16 �53 A7-3 2R4 AZ-4 247 rJ I I I L � I I I � Z J 111I11' I --- Fitt' I Assisted Livin Second Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 16'-0" 11 2 rJ I I rJ 1 I I Hatch Pattern Key Roof Below a:.nlrn u.. ng SUITE TAPE SIZE Studio Al 101 —__ A2 410 A3 4I8 A4 J3'_ BLS 79G Ab 16, A7 509 O J j,, Blue ieJr ynn BI 545 B2 572 B3 512 134 b75 B5 6,14 B6 596 B7 fi95 13B 660 1v�o Be lroamBedroam CI 931 Hemar, C'ere SUITE lA'PE SIZE S1ndl0 A7_-I1 321 AZ-Ib '_53 A7-2 314 v-3 2S4 AZA 247 PROJECT NAME SHEET NAME LA Q U I N TA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ALF SECOND FLOOR PLAN EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30, 2012 _ AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 TELEPHONE 503 399-1090 FAX: 399-0 A_R_CHIIECT: _ Daniel Roach Cal #33282 f �� Daniel RoachBr,hitut ADDRESS: 471HIGHSTREET SE, SUITE 10 ry" AUl!11A1Cp C-vxex HAVVTHO SALEM, OREGON 97301 _ TELEPHONE: 503-399-1090 FAk T 503-399-0565 4f,w ,, t 471nlgh 50eet 5E, Su1te 105oleln.Oregon 97301 RETIREMENT GROUP 7lf OF CA��i r5033991090 15033990565 Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 REVISION: — j - — //2 //2 • 1 Van uv Vancouver, WA 9Bfi62-B210 �� L (360) 213-1550 Fax (360)213-1540 30.03 36 Cottage "B" ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" Cottage "B" FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" 5:i1 ROLE PITCH - AFL A ITEGTIIRAL FEATURES •VEr r47rE?Golpti F-111 =PARAPET EIGHTS PER PLAN 2 � . COLOR ICI - c COLOR: ICI •A I E TIVIT ) BLUSH' (26k REFLECTIVITY) � 3 .STUCCO SIDING )��. COLOR: ICI • ELDORADO T—' TAN" (61k REFLECTIYIT"; STUCCO 5VN6 C. OR: !CI •AV66A NATLRALLT DALM' � (441 REELEGTIY T, WokE aD.w g0.,dw G:,YAMEL ca.NTRr. LEC#5'P'.8 1CLCLG1Pa� -ian'C +TE'� "a —.TIED I sw.aa iwrp. � %cW cPLcu. >~4wdew., r.Ie 7 PRE•M \1FAG-EFL"J A6i.-•r042" CCLGf, 9! ABC a aufa v5 =0.W. B. Mc AL 8 —A- CO..OML To MWA' - BL:[ rpq • rr. - vfAC ID 13L• RocIF -A4 A(' I RE i. I!Al -L - YI `IIII iv_ai c ��ry nor T427 I I TRELLIS - VA,uRAL JIOOD F N 5- lentyarchitecture "I Hlph SUMI SE,Sulb 10 Sawr.Onpon 97501 I S. 3991090 F5033990565 wkNlT9rwp.t9m ;o I n UPPER PARAP=T LOVER PARAPET II-9' n FF. V� l�R PLgµ n Fri LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION a [ 1 3 .n a 14 t0 4 uFi'E� LOVER PARAPET -9' n FF— Cottage "B" ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION PROJECT NAME: LA Q U I NTA. RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: COTTAGE" ' Cottage "B" Cottage „B" EXHIBIT DATE: AMENDMENT N3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 AMENDMENT - - - — OWNER/DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC SECTION " A" R SECTION "B" ADDRESS: VAN OVER WA 8 MALLDR.,SUITE200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-B210 SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" TELEPHONE: (503 399-1090 FAX: 5031 399-0565 airditB(Y Daniel Roach ARCHITECT' ADDRESS: Danfel Roach Cd 133282 471 HIGH STREET SE. SUITE 10 �+ 0.WUF01[II r ssru HAWTHOR SALEM, OREGON 97301 # k 'ylE- 1F OF pAY 4A High St[e t SE swe 10 Sol-, ae9an 97M RETIREMENT GROUP p5033991090 r5033990565 9310NEVencowerMailDr., Suile200 Vancouver, coer, WA 90862-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 TELEPHONE: 503-399-1090 FAX: 503-399-0565 REVISION' J - L 31 of 36 5:12 R RTC O d ALL AID ITECTURAL Qv ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1" = &-(r 'AP4 WA836A , MASTOI PA Y HAFI3 . 9IXiOOM .A� � E, l 4-F= 1 =�-WAT , BATH C' L Iv I 1 1 l u'•o• u'•®' _ -JMTK Ij 0.9 IFF I 1 pTAY BEORppY�EH 1 � 4.. - t 8._.. Cottage "F" FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" 5.12 RCCF RICH O ALL AFiCI.'ITECTURAL FEATU-;!=S v'qv Pe!?�P7 Oi�R PFQ_PE' &...=f- - LIM-0k � -I YI I r"1 1"I 1-1 ���� �rrarrrrrrr��la )1 r'rr ii■ � W� �j '�, FRONT ELEVATION i'.4 A).. "Aea-Y-r REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION Cottage ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" Cottage "F" SECTION "A" SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" ayumux Daniel Roachuchitect l' )37C - - A 471 I99h Sheet SE, Suite 10 Salem On 97301 F 503 3991090 F503 399 0565 CBE wiWIDG O" • i•SICo- A PER Fy" ' - 1 • AT4cCO ND'� 6Tf7�kYa W-01%. -W .ACS" 'au'ii h Pl'17 Wp M !C1 •Ay%&p �"-ELL'Ott?O.TdTa• .. 1Q�F ECT Viir. 4" • 6�•G0P 6mhaF CO_OIG V *AM," NIAT RA`Ir CLALM ut RS��c-ylr�, 6 � . STC%z 5 -0'P0'G COL01C U.CA ML COAVq I' a ' • ~r , Ff AAM-ZD LATM IWLVGJOYr W✓IS'4 ATL~ ':mc-b m".� Nip _ Y►1Wj - A+ - ..1 w .A'LN3 COLOR. Q.ACw i p 1 A,J�:NG DOLOR: 9R— PETAL �IL1M.Ya-1 e • ?TAG COLOR: TO h1ATGH BLGG- W DOLOR - TYP. • FLAT ROG - 1a IANLFACTURER: SARJ L - IF+•�Y E\ERGYS`+ART TAN OIL i �� 1 TFSiL3 - 1PELL1, RIGHT ELEVATION Cottage "F" SECTION "B" SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" IIm architecture 411 W9h Strat SE Sint 10 Sent. olOe 97301 '5033991090 F5033990565 wimrxt 9ru — HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUPIr 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360)213.1550 Fax (360)213-1540 =jib "IT-7i6 m0 N N Van Garage ROOF PLAN van uara e FLOOR PLAN Iz! 131 1 FRONT E NATION 2 '� n r� • l� OTTERIOR LDI. H TO r ORER EAI'-EA R: lfrb' SHEATHNG'JV BL' � PdAER I?� $ I I = . LEFT ELEVATION (RIGHT SIDE SIM.) Van Garage ienitY ELEVATIONS architecture 471 A Sew Sulte lO Sokm.Ore9on 97301 r 503399 r5033990565 r1eMlY9mu — 2 REAR ELEVATION Van Gara-e SECTION "A" KET' VOTES/COLORS r� • PARAPET ROOF u 1E'G T VARIES SEE ELEVATION r : 67Xf.Q eD- s COLM ClI-A 4 ^lAT14¢ALLT CALM• fl6?, ffELECTMTY .GARAGE AND STORAGE DOOR COLOR. V •AC664 NAn LT Cd M' 1A611011N f c'.Tnaa k _ YJ, r.V W h F N l OF CALL 0 SECTION CARPORT) SCALE: Daniel Roach°rrhitert 3W XMe Coot SE, Salem, Omm 97301 P503399EM PS033990565 nknitfladXeATure.mm mcJ LP ROO To ATCN MAN E�JILDIK. i YcaLkrw OLEVAT,l ON 6 STALL CARPORT SCALEI'-0" ri OOF PLAN (CARPORT) COLOR OILTOTCW YdLW, V BII!LDAK+ PROJECT NAME: SHEET NAME H A W TH O R RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Suite 200 Vanwuver, WA OB662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 EXHIBIT DATE: OWNER / DES ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: ARCHITECT: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: REVISION: LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY VAN GARAGE / CARPORT JULY 30, 2012 AMENDMENT #3 for SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-M HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR.. SUrrE 200 VANCOUVER. WA 98662-8210 (503)399.1090 ,FAX: (SMI 399.0565 Daniel Roach Cal #33282 471 HIGH STREET SE, SURE 10 SALEM, OREGON 97301 503$99.1090 I FA)Q 503-M-O565 1l 33 d 36 F1, =0'I ANED 30'-OII 1i1111MOM1111 01 EMERGENCY A4 CCESS GATE BOX Z. TUBULAR STEEL FRAME G,4TES � LA6 SGLeJ AT p�Aa CEDAR 4ffi • I'OG 1 4 S-AA-bo SHAPED CORBEL DETAIL 3 (AT TRELLIS ENDi as�:gv�,a,eel, SCALE: I' - I'-0" 4- STAINED CEDAR ,E s a ul,O.C. 6x1D SUS BEAM - , 6x0 -5 BEAM -51-5OJ' DECORATIVE-- 11-. G i(Il Y' LAG SCREW AT EA 4XB B_ IIA`I b •b Rd 9:5- s A,,N TO MA'c. =aav s1EAr..: 2 (A SHAPED CORBEL DETAIL T POOTRELLIS) T, a..,o:P aao4T�wob,noly, SCALE: ".1'-- 4XB STAi\ED CEDAR ii ��• tiG =� BEAMS •' 2"O.C. EXT. STUCCO PER ELEVATIONS 'I.£ATHER E515TANT BARR ER _ 41 4 LAG BOLTS _ - SEp'LANT AROIN-ID ENTIRE (ATTACH OVER - 'NIIDE EDGE OF BEAM PEEL STICKI - _ 6x0 W5 BEAM -- - DECORATIAEE ` 2 x b B'LKG/ - BACKI�ya Fq2 BEAM ANGLE ! / . &. - y f41 114 LAG 6x8 R/5 STAINED BOLTS CEDAR BEAM �. —12' WIDE 5TRIP OF 'SR'PSOJ" DECORATIVE "rOR- FIBER' PEES HLGPC' L•t• c �__i_ 15T'CK FLEXIBLE 7• FLASH VG EXTERIOR 'BEAM' DETAIL 0 GBEAM DETAIL (DAE AND 5TUC0ONITI DON5)TPOOLTRELL'6) I', I'-0" :w,.o:r.e�osnawewvocac 1 SCALE: 1'=1'-0" .oko�P�s.eoroexzoa9 KEY NOTES/COLORS II1❑ = PARAPET I ROOF HEIGHTS -ER P-AN I- 1 2 = 5TLCC0 SIDING I COLOR: ICI •AG56b 'AUTU" BLUSH 126% REFLECTIVITYI ( 3 Sm:CCO SIDING CCLCR ICI •A2662 I I E-DCRADO TAN' ( ' lbl% REF�ECTIV;TYJ I I I I STUCCO SIDING COLD¢ ICI •AL664 NATJRALLY CALM" ftXi (44x REFLECTII'TYI I O I BTO.E BIDMG COLOR: CAR 11- COITRY LEDGESTONE /ELDERADOI y�j • VNYL FRN-IED \SL_ATED +3r'Il Ivl UNDD:Y W/TRIM COLOR: Mdruracwwer Mia IIIIII� I Valley - 4'mrmd I 7 = FRE-MAMA�ACTERED ALJM NU`t I I RAILKs COLOR, COLOR,. BLACK AWJiNG COLOR: BRLJN PETAL I \G ICIIN = PTAC COLOR: TO rATCI L9 1 �pG COLOR - TYP. FLAT RCC= - 1(1I M,W,. ACTURER: SARNAFIL - IIR6 ENERGYSMART TAN Pool House�L�TAT RELLIS RAL WOOD FNIS ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" ti A N Pool House FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" Pool House SECTION "A" SCALE: 1" = 8'-0" a M1FSp11CN Daniel Roach,uhited � k .A 471 HO Street SE Sutle 10 Salem 0re9oa 973N c503 3991090 r 5W 399 0565 for cxt+� .ueq lentyarchitecture 471 Street SE SUIM 10 Salem, Ore9an 47301 c 503399 c5033990565 wleNly9row.can HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr„ Suite 200 V9nwuver, WA 96662-8210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 FRO 4 ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION (RIGHT SIDE SIM.) REAR ELEVATION Pool House ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1 " = 8'-0" I I Y'� I i Section E-E Retirement Residence Section D-D I r Section C-C ,•-, ^�� Three Story Retirement Residence Section B-B Carport Garage One Story Cottage Existing Residence neurement riesiaence r+eUlULVU II_1VI119 vriv .awry - Assisted Living Residence Key Plan --- ------ - -- ® m ® Im Im Im im uu - --- _- = Two Story Existing Assisted Living i Residence Carport Garage I Cottage Retirement Residence Assisted Living One Story Assisted Living Residence Section A -A SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" I I 0 15 30 60 90 Daniel Roach°rthi,ett HAWTHO[ —0.:.-u3150KeftCovl5FSalern.Oregon 9nOl RETIREMENT GROUP ' Of CIA, P 503 399 1090 15033990565 WWftWd*KM. xn 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr„ Suile200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360)213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 Existing Residence COLOR TO MATC- DArac ANYIP)E fl1oI (3) ROWS OF 3x 51LPR'.7163 METAL OF L )X! $YAWED - tl) V • n 9' OLT LOG MATERIAL. NAILED IN ON p4 PT. SOIWALL -h6 L CEDAR MI dCQal AT ilA 5'XC- BOTH $IDES. STARTING FROM COLOR TO MATCH MAIN THE UNDERSIDE OF THE TOP TT� CEDAR IM1d BJILDU 6 WO.GME PLATE RA)NINY DOWN 6 121 5TUD5 EA 5111E FEET ALONGSIDE EACH SIDE DE.— - S L L'ALL CEETE 6 MASONRY OF THE WINDOW - SOLID W/ GROJT C,tlTTER Tg! CEDAR 7X9 % FI'•<' _ _ - = ( 5 HORL a Ae., f • TOP I WALL FP?1lAG - 1 a• PTE GOLLAPF PT OX& COI BOTTOM 140- ARO..ND Y' urgz rrgT 6 FRAciB 6• CURB ENS�DE PER PLAN N W GA[! .N D _! ry a l 501-�('�TA4 P1ML4 WALLS <!TPJ S vERT. • 32' -CENTER i ,F _ Y' CPC SLAD r -N CMII AN HWK INTO TRASM NdSyRE CsATES q e 24• ee FOOTNG SNEATHNG V -_ FMSrI GRADE SCREEN SUPPORT - PLANIS FgVJMPERR2 -- P' ALL I?••D• AZIDrpR p0.Te eT 4• I - -YrY AJL T+[JeT SIDIING ETleF1]`FM WBIr/e d/8 /iT'1PSCM• p[CORAiIv( ROOF PLAN eRAMW6 Y4L6 Rt C.MOaF ENOND TWONDI S SCCIIT 'N-6>!'C-f(e,ACICJ ,TAN TO MATPJ (Il la" x l �' LAG I CEDAR BCAMS BOLT PER MANUF u SECTION �l, OEDAM AM e •y 2A•DL.• p PROVIDE_5 PEGBOARD F•) ON ALL WALLS FOR a G0.1F'M A TOOL AND EOJIFMENT e a STORAGE CS TAINED nwvo D COLUMN DETAIL n 6" PIPE �' 6•. ' TRELLf211�i" x 5" LAG BOLT AT } LAP I : I":I'-0" Tvrtnvxisnrwro -1. 6' 9GIUARE PLATE WELD § t7! ]O' TO ROD PER M4NLP irP. t7iDooftw 1 I I - l.1rTCR(OR TTrIIp.R TO MATCw Heft K r F - _ aE 1L.FF lR-eBfbTNl1 are 6TAWEp CEDAR I"xl" N55 SUPPORT O f5111L. _� a .�- w"N p1A Tlpl ////rr BARRIER TWReI EI PER E E �E�AT ]: PUWELDED i0 MFG D r 1 I 1 eoLT6 - rwl SH END 2f. 2+" M•d• Pr 6X6 CALUIIJ LEpGER� OL%.. eCAEw fA g.ee BEAM JpT11T�� a�� YGLOPE 1 k- I14 + BACKING FOR14 L! is RR?AI"1 z d 41 x - T� !i EI C4 Ge L O rAa WITH Ap FLAE + 2"x4" wee - PLATMiE F 611FATTAm FRAFE 'H"MAX --. [KT. STUCCO Mm iRANSITICN 1D ELEVAlbp 11., u55 CAP DID5 AC PAVNG 1'•l• R9Er TO PORT RPE A0.LA� NDTE, 6LOP! -K;+ o r cfl w5 alert TAl'e• a 5' LAG BIXJ"xl" H55 SUPPORT gELDED TO f"FG I 6• PER MA1lF TYP WELDED i0 MFG CAP H55 PLATE AND 2'+2" FRONT ELEVATION $IDE ELEVATION FIELD INSTALL II FILL) O.rr f!A TO LPROAD FROM.. OP 2'•p• _ T•I• PLATE AND 2"x2' CAP ENDS FLUSH m-Am 64TE AND HNGE5 SgEJ FALL FRPI BUM1D+IG !XT WAIN FLUSH BEAM TO ENV err �• TIP. f3E�PNp AWNING CONNECTION DETAIL TOOL SHED ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR 'BEAM' DETAIL 5ECTIpN GARDEN TOOL AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE CSTONE AND STUCCO GONDITION5) O1YALE• 11/2'.1•.p• ..A.a••LEmvu.YeEne.F4e SCdLE:1/4".I'-O" n�uuruorn.ee LA aezrA-oerAi.xwl_ 'F-'{45" A R.E'. r-+"iC�lidr SGdLE: I"=I'-O" r.ros•onisnmmrauwozzmmm EiCALEI-V6^ 1'-®" T•...wlv�N�tAaA cwaAbTT•L>~a9nTrw �E• DE F1'GIER W! ADJACENT 1 TO tlE ►zLLE.D 11/• �GI TO [ENi T aSE tlPA ATN (3) TIEf FOUNT, OTHER STONE STONE SEAT c f0 NTAIN ELE A f0 +'FAT. • STONE CAP =A• pc, TIP____ IP SEAT 6" CML; STONE LINE OF VENEER WATER TIP A' Qy 6" CMU A COWi� FILL W/ GRAVEL SLAB •4'S WEEP HOLE A5 e 16" - EIU. REO'D FOUNTAIN EDGE USECTION WATER III 0 IND ' CONC T'IFr'Ia2AeS [PP7L SL46 ! M 5 Le191QI TO 111 oCEW A. WA 6' ATER - - L"s .Cr;R&7PE '- 1)) ILI AT 122 A 41iAAIM SECTION *, AOTTC I VALVE, C01MCT TO GrpRt � pS ll • P!R F GUTTER T�{V�I•1�r 1T RYJ RAN l A R BEAM PER STRICT, CEMENT 5RD. OVER BUILDING PAPER FIBI AND STICK LAP OVER BUILDING PAPER 2.6 STUD WALL 5/4, CEDAR TRIM BRO, OVER EXT PLAN B PLYWOOD SHTG FOR PLAN FRP FN15H AT CAN .i CAti•;..5 WASH NTEROR ,Cm .A CONCRETE CURB CdP 6EO STUCCO 51TICeI A D1. A WEATHERA - li" WIDE 6TRIP�OF �'FORTIFIEER PEAL N Ni BARRIER _ STICK FLEXIBLE FLASHNG 3.5 STAINED CEDAR �`--. IN I CUT 6HT'G AROUND BEAM a 12"0. - DECORATIVE �-� ANGLE TO RECE55 6.10 R/S BEAM ! A r. ryx I"w OOr-!•I'i TYI A 1L55R''rSLAr:S) I L4AG SCRE 1 NG fmt ALE I (ATTACH OVLLSER REAL R PEAL AND I 6.0 CEDAR ®X 1IBERGLA55 OR ALUMINUM I^ STI K) �AN n fr TAPERED FLAGPOLE -r-- BAGCRJG FOR ! BEAM I I 1 I EXTERIOR 1 I WALL PER I I I I PLAN EXT SHT'G I FER PLAN —� II _ I 121 'A" z 4" LAG �5CREW5 1 EEIL&NY AT EACH FO DATIDN PER MANUFACTURES SCIIIE II AT EA. )ne �_ - SIDE OF ANGLE RECO'1MENDATION5 (MAY VARY SEAM W/ SOILS AND WIND CONDITION5) , '^STUCCO SYSTEM FLAG POLE STAINED BEAM DETAIL ERIOR'BEAM' CONNECTION DETAIL SET GONE) (AT DECK TRELLIS) TUGGO CONDITIONS)ALE,NpT�SCALE: OLCCsROUND I'zI'-0"CILEEXAT ALE:-0" Tresw.P.Fneeslnwammala NOTE: ALL STAIN TO PD6T5 B€ 'B€NR' COLOR CLIFF ROCK" ela•50. 6•.DC.WITH STEEL CAPS 5/B"so PIMETS MAX, on I" x I -la" AND Bon RAILS 11 ' CONIC ELEVATION �,t• EXTERIOR FOUNTAIN DETAIL CAN WASH a1LpriG (POOL ND ALF FENCE SECTION (FRONT ENTRY) BE STEEL)ALETSCI:24J P�weurHorNice.le olNre.oerNLs�euce I -PAR S -11. u ER FOCI PER !OILS REPORT o FOUNDATION LAYOUT E C�1-:4 TO I_". roan OLtiFLTO.IOI `�' Daniel Roachmhitect � `� c.333e) ✓y, lb W:r • I I tit 3150 Keels Caul SE Salem, Oregon 97301 FAf G:��4 e5033991090 P5033990565 WIenINac*K1M.oeM HAWTHOR RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mail Dr., Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 96662-6210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540 R West Perspective from adjacent property PROJECT NAME: I LA Q U I NTA _ _RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SHEET NAME: PERSPECTIVE FROM SEELEY DRIVE EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 30.2012 AMENDMENT a3 for SPEC71C PLAN 2W1-055 OWNER / DEVELOPER: HAWTHORN DEVELOPMENT LLC ADDRESS: 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DR., SUITE 200 VANCOUVER, WA 98662-8210 _ TELEPHONE 503 399.1090 FAX 503 3P9 05E Daniel Roach architect ARCHITECT: ADDRESS. Daniel Roach COI #33782 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 G V' pirxPPUY � H A W T H 0 �. SALEM,OREGON 97301 TELEPHONE, sa3399-1p90 FAX- 503.399-0565 �f .,,. a • �.„ yPF Of CALI t stso K.M. cam se, sd«n, arom w301 P5033991090 F5033990565 wlwAmdilalwe.ca0 RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr., Sulte200 REVLiION: __ Vancouver, WA 98662-6210 (360) 213-1550 Fax (360) 213-1540- o� V JL GETTY STONE - EMBASSY BLEND lenit xchitecture 471; Nigh Street SE, Suite 10 Solern, Oregon 97301 0503 399 1090 F503 399 0565 w ienitygrcup.com 8 [] NATURALLY CALM t ELDORADO TAN AUTUMN BLUSH STONE: Coronado Getty Stone - Embassy Blend STUCCO: ICI Paints - Autumn Blush, Naturally Calm, Eldorado Tan La QWinta Retirement Community La QuInta, California HAWTHOF RETIREMENT GROUP 93'0 NE Vancouver Men Or., Sulce 200 Vanmuver, WA 99662-8210 (360) 213 1SW Fax (360) 213 1640 TREATMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES H.p NIBER ON PLN! BM MORIMN ro Ns I wATa auwrr uver / nTRATIox arelsl wNNAu evnBe row: evxAa a]wnox / BlAmvrw vux SIIE DEMON wNCEPT SITE DESIGN AND wwemvE IMTURAL AREAO \ -� � -�4 ( BO BMP WXB1NmT BTwE}4 BBGWMI(B MO PNWq LOi PWL9 MDTBIi. BOFN/LI Mm PI.wfW LO}WOTNB MPB F �. -�I W MBIIY GLe 0VmA 1ffi[WgBiPNf.VpB flVlfY Ym B1VP0]Md]MR Pt9B9TYli i. - 'I - / O BI.P 8 RpW'ALMB V BMB18 VIVO! OAWTI!} PM{M B 1VIBIIIG M B]R®f. 80CN.LLlt NO BMWP LOt NO]W MP B M qfV M IA OINf.L lNmlO'Itl TIlmM04 I IBE1 s gm-1 QH 1RD1 � �pq�pp pq ye' @rypp�1 OBry,y' I' OE M611 �PEmW.O IH N.N 1 IK BW . I 7 7 �9M1 T' I / qo I I ... .... 32 BED MEN&Y ,l py gjwyl FF�� FACILITY I loon slo[rl I ,� ffMLL Twel ] r I - PF � PE EPA ITWJ s mw 72".SUITE ASSISTED LIVING I o hwyl m021 Ma RESIDENCE 10 u T. Bbryl ' j Twol Z� R. mllm. tFowo s LEOENO CONTBAIFb —m�rnm pa�N[ MI W[d ®Mwav ud emx/w�[e� �.-4 b-]-B FF IOW PE IDLD nmBo s]oM a 12 SUITE RETIREMENT j RESItNCE !\/ ITMeeBloryl 4 IRaLB OnVI PP IBLB] PE mN LEWAD CONTBIIIEO ABBREVIATIONS a BETTLpp10�BARNµ{V�OLW�.yEU:E L M P 1]]1 (v) (wRl o IJ�a o n 1}R A l 2]2] Sm4 aW 4 SITE DESIGN BEST MANAGEMENT PI SRE WAIN C DEFT 2. MUNIZE DIRECTLY I W. OW ew ee i 1B� IWOPOBEU oawIL [ AIeM 'N /rMID 81) - 10 BMP 1 �`..µ PROPpgON BURP 2 :IRETFNTIBN - Tc,� z 7 \ \ \ VACA" u errn Nr / R' � ,R-aye rT LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITI TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36406 n I TY Ott i 1 < - %-�'t �•. I - ---- I � .� I^`—r -I_-� I r I I_-,-- I - :_ L--;r I��I 11 'i- .� �i I� iG :8C7 1 78$i I i I- ftR SCSS SAS I i$ tBYi fi 8t S4fj I WO � # A 32 BED MEMORY CARE 1 �� I Ion 81ery1 FF 10027 FACLKY F MAI a. I PE BB.E Ipro 910rY1 IOne 9bp P g �m - �' II IPMM Twal A py��gAA / ' y m 80..6 I >, PPIWs] �TS\SUITE ASSISTED LIVN3 rt °a1wy1 PP 911A] ppe 1 RESIDENCE .YE Imo lon aM Two alorrl I I ft .. TAW- / \ j SIOryI x rtwe I ru,eul .. i r•��� A" f�. .. 1 R r`*"v. ��ww� � &� _ \" o �> \ \. / 1__ . _. - E 1" 132 SUITE RETRE RESIDENCE Im�..�lnyl wwe o«r vE mm F rtn«maianl � f \4 t s d N \ �� ABB�VYiIX]B PARRWR TABLE R.10.4«'m 4 . Cµ�i A MF9 AM Fc —�Yu6t'iiGi W�i.'R ewmvY SOME I•�10' ®m�ra V mmn m. meu w MAP MANEPo I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36406 1 CTY LIMIT UNE (TYP.) iJ O,h CCLH YLoi wo O" ITE' OIYV EJF C47Y �A62R �B�RY P.�I® EZ DRM1� lE I 07V OF p CFTY OF LA QFIWA R'L10 MMTY N,T,S, PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CUT (CY) ALL (CY) RAW QUANTITIES 2B,981 8,604 SUBSIDENCE 2,166 884 RAW ADJUSTED 26,815 9,488 SHRINKAGE 1.054 gRR_fw..µ'AT1QH 14.144 14,144 OVER -EX SHRINKAGE 1,572 SUBTOTAL 40,959 28,258 EXPORT 14.701 TOTAL EARTHWORK 40,959 40,959 ASSUMED EARTHWORK ANALYSIS FACTORS THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WERE USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE EARTHWORK ANALYSIS: SHRINKAGE: 10% (AVERAGE VALUE) SUBSIDENCE: 0.2' (AVERAGE VALUE) OVER -EXCAVATION DEPTH: BUILDING PAD - 2 FEET BELOW THE EXISTING GROUND OR FINISHED PAD ELEVATION, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER, AND SHOULD EXTEND 10' BEYOND THE OUTER EDGE OF EXTERIOR FOOTINGS. ALL OF THE FACTORS WERE OBTAINED FROM GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FILE NO. 1964-01 PREPARED BY: EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY WAS PROVIDED BY INLAND AERIAL DISCLAIMER- QUANTITY ESTIMATE MSA CONSULTING, INC, MAKES NO REPRESENTATION CONCERNING THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ON THESE PLANS, EXCEPT THAT ALL SUCH FIGURES, INCLUDING ALL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES, ARE PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES AND FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY TO PREPARE HIS OWN QUANTITY ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR COST PURPOSES_ MSA CONSULTING, INC, SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DEVIATIONS BETWEEN ESTIMATED QUANTITIES AND ACTUAL QUANTITIES AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, �����I ADA PATH OF THE PRELIMINARY ADA PATHS OF ACCESS ROUTES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO ADA COMPUANCE STANDARDS, UPON COMPLETION OF THE PRECISE GRADING AND PAVING PUNS THE FINAL DESIGN AND LOCATION OF THE ADA ACCESS ROUTES WILL BE DEPICTED IN MORE DETAIL AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIRED ADA COMPLIANCE STANDARDS. FEMAI THIS PROJECT IS COVERED BY FIRM PANEL NUMBERS 06065C2231G AND 06065C2233G EFFECTIVE AUGUST 2B, 20DB. THESE MAPS INDICATE THAT THE PROJECT AREA IS DESIGNATED AS ZONE X. INDICATING AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2R ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPUIN. -PROPOSED ACITLR-STONE 'CHECKER BLOCII' P (oE9CNEVOW 0 FO �D 60,00o � TR:;W 26'/30' PROP, OR EX BLOCK WALL (EAST P/L ONLY / ALONG THE 10S•/12S' 6• 10A'/145• 2• WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY P/L A LORETAINING WALL WITH A 42" FENCE ON TOP MAY BE REQUIRED IN CERTAIN AREAS P1—.• SWµE HICKENEO EDGE 12" MINIMUM) SECTION A -A PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD (NO PARKING) 1"=5' O ,5/S`�y�j .•�```1`'1�•��H�°�f���Z�4i�'` �1������i�\`��Qi� EXISTING LA QUINTA DOG PARK REPLACE EXISTING IAINDBDIPr11D W KIND, r E001000 TU9YL4t wraL o PRDT a W PLACE F>RStgJO OROQND� - CREATE DRAINAGE COLLECTION SWALE AND VAR" - 1 1 �•• 2S �S PROPOSED ASSISTED LIVING SUITES DIRECT FLOWS TO THE EXISTING ORAIN I ' PROPOSED AMR -STONE 'CR£CKER BLOCK• ERS INLET AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. PAVWITH DECOMPOSED QRHWE IN VOIDS (DESIGNED TO CARRY 80,000 lb- FIRE TRUCK) SECTION C-C PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD NO PARKING) 1 "=I O• ' RAM --- Al ------- ._ ---- 30' Sidiu DRAIN fi _ww ts• !Y (TO BE CWpA9-E0 N Fm DESNi I} PROPOSED ERDSIOII CONTROL-' "'. `Ca" IPRO+•pSEp EROSION fpNIRpL . wLIm TO SE OE"'ERMWE0 MmWT*N TO RE OET zmo N nNx DE51cM IN FRIµ DESIgM STORM ORNI SECTION D-D PROPOSED TYPICAL OFF -SITE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EARTHEN SWALE 1,=5. COLD BROOK LANE i 1 1 TRH° 2=15 I SI.gRLE FANOUl REWDRV4N4AL TR Ov Rao 209OR =180 DOS Proposed Emergency Knox / -Proposed h 28' Wide rrctmsed PmFcea{, 28' Wide I�BOX Access rste ' Fire Lane Private Storm Drnin Line F're Lane ,re Lim so IF so- - - — ---- - _ OLIP tege F I 32 BED MEMORY CARE rreah I tan Sre i / FACILITY d0'1Ye ) B Wide (One Story) IOM BtaY) lone Story) Fire tarry (Phase Two) Ueteos dCMok N/ Rlr (Above Grorsrm �` / Pro (Two Story> ITwo Story) }r �^ ---- --- - �~ 1~� -u,� , , "� N, � le 72 SUITE ASSISTED LIVING (Two Story) . X. ITt' e" story) ■ / RESIDENCEEXISTING 30' (Oneand Two Slory) 1 J `� �� 3 1 I J SEWER EASEMENT SANITARY IPhe3a Two) / / . J / �J/ // ��� 1 � � / PROPOSED SEWER LINE TO BE -" � 6 q x CONSTRUCTED TO EXISTING STUB -OUT AT WHrTEWATER 1 16 Q / J / e CHANNEL J%f / PPo ad 20, / r (Two Story) / Prgpgeed CVWO Easement PROPOSED 30'STORM // \ / term main DRAM EASEMENr Trash Detector Check ♦ // Enclosure PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LWE IAbove Ground) ♦ r // JJ TTO EXISTING STU"UT O BE CONSTRUCTED TO ' _ \ / / /J / LEGEND' WHITEWATER CHANNEL AT f EXISTING WATER LINE I _ FONT OF CONNECTION ..L__ _ • / / I ■ f // / - EXISTING GAS LINE c' AJ .*— EXISTING JOINT UTILITY TRENCH Pro-- - "�. a• y� SO ._._ / J // / /' - -_ -- EXISTNG C.V.WD. SEWER LINE CVWD Easement XSTING PUBLIC STORM DRAIN LINE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WATER LINEJ------------PROPOSD C.V.W.D. EASEMENT Prgpoeed _ �\ �_ rl'x'\\. - �' n StormLine Drnln ppOPOSED C.V.W.D. SEWER LINE \ _� dACAL�JT >o PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LINE W Lbs ♦ 132 SUITE RETIREMENT O Service •. PROPOSED C.V.W.D. WATER LINE .:very Area GO6`B�®'®S� PROPOSED PRIVATE FIRE LINE t' ndrr ♦ RESIDENCE O Trsnelormer PH 212/60 \\ TO. S995B _ -M PROPOSED WATER METER w/ REDUCED PRESSURE DEVICE Propoud IThrOo StOryl 1 Emergency Water Line (Phase Ono] 1 a.. or On PROPOSED DETECTOR CHECK Easement Po 1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT -r.,F Herres 1 PROPOSED WATER VALVE \ / Proposed Emergency Knox PROPOSED SEWER CLEAN -OUT / Box Aeons. Gate PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASINE3 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN / O PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE / ' • � ('fhTN story) PoW /o Proposed 92' / • _;� \ \ CVWD Easement ❑ PROPOSED BUILDINGS / I ti I / I I I l f ' CI7V OF d1.1 ®MANTA PIONEER PARK 6013-130=005 PH 292/BO 7R. MUS xm Drain Line Proposed - Prlvete Fire Line 28' Wlde 1:11 Lane Proposed Emergency Knox Box. Access Gate Proposed sod Emergency Proposed \ Kirox SOx Access Onto t• SLine , � \ \ � � \ 1 sod Proposed x�e. 1 Water Llne - r so, Wide _ - - '� s + yr Fire Lane EXISTING JOINT UTILITY TRENCH �'� � � — _ / NOTE' EXISTING PUBLIC STORM DRAIN LINES �►� _ 30' Will 1 - -- HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CLEARANCES EMSTNG C.V. IN WATER LINESHALL EXISTING C.V.W.D. SEWER LINE �Y _ Fire Lana MEET CALIFORNIA OF EXISTING PUBLIC STORM DRAM LINE 1 y �,J _ Propgsod Emergency Knox , , ProPosad 20' LProDoeed QVyVp Easement Warts Drain Lila WsW HEALTH SERVICES REQUIREMENTS ARNp COACHEStorm VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. SEPARATION F/QCQ�7T 1 1 1 Bqx Acccaa SetoSFOiwLzM w�-yBOAl - P59 02/60 TLC. �9940 PROPOSED WATER L E POINT OF CONNECTION\ 'Pd EISENNOWFA GADICA'L CEHTER 1 _ D�=630=069 REIM— D• to• ae• tze• rqY 1 � � � / - � l t C• ' SCALE t"-e0' 1/ COLD BROOK LANE I � 1 l �•R��U�a-�'�� ��®�-t,9�=DtdS I I I ������t���� B�ACILLr Fe+i(a�LY RlfJllliB�Yl�L - Y%61(:Y FAO. Z:��28Q �:�3=•'19'-fJ=®1H4 See Shoat .I of 2 I Sae gl�.ct 2 of 2 I 6�fl=C(9�DDOd DJ4���9re0®� Emergency for Cross Section I 804-$43-DC4 A"44$'•9a4 for Cr er Section Proposed Emargeneyl Knox ' �G`w-^•ti9=�"�� }l��w-'°) ilea g� �Wi�^�n,aJ9�02' Vehlcle T6f1. tS11in Proposed -ae' wide i`eox Aaoeaa data 1 2V Wide rProDoesd A Hammerhead Fire Lane A / FT Hydrant Piro Hydran Fir. Laea Turn -Around Proposed Zero Care / 1 r f , I car I 1 `. YLRACaY R��eJ� I 1 l• DUP tago F //•p� af�4'=39=Dad / : / A 32 BED MEMORY CARE A { t I (One Storyl Wide (oA��CILITY) (One Storyl e�Mrn I I f I � I /I �' 6 •♦, Proposed - r 9• 1 (Phase Two) 11 I ♦ Fire Hydrant i I % 1 r111 •�� 4r � I ITwo story) ♦ s ! i 1 l ♦. lat Floor - \♦ Quv OF LA ®IUfHY& II (Two story) 1 ♦ a 51.662 s.f. ♦ r � a \`�\c,• �■ � PIOMEIER PARK 11 1 2nd Floor -+ n + ■ 24,883 61 - ♦ .fr 0 t \ �\ / / PH 292/60 1 f 1 Total - Irm nMU I 1 78.746 set. \, - ♦ / �`` Cie, ♦ I, \ / See Sheet 2 of 2 1 a ♦ / 1 for Grose Section B // ♦♦ / ♦� - if ,' \ `�• / 2a• Wide I 72 SUITE ASSISTED LIVINGS (Two Story) f ♦ i ��� 1 ,�� T r i , \ �� / Fhs LemI RESIDENCE / Story). I 1 Praposad CuvOrae Eniranoo 13 5' / 1f (Three Story) /' i � `. f 1 [One and Tara Story) Va. VMloal Clearance. Sea sheaf �f " / \ l Whose Two) 2 of 2 for Typical Covered Entry ♦♦ � \ \ I 1 Elsvaticn / // \ ♦ r / 1 Se-ti o-y arrr a / / ♦ ♦♦ ' LEGEND \ _ nraDaeed em rgencr Knox }El (Two Story) Apr^' ► ♦ /— y crash EXISTING WATER LINE 8a>: Accoae O►se / p _ a' i I // Enclosure rviceµ EX ST NG FIRE AN \ `4 "topoaad N 0 I f .S, r r / / DNNery \ Zero Car6 /t 1 rr / / / Area - PROPOSEEDWATER D PRIVATE FIRE LINE \ •-a. r ---- / / / b �r-Fropoaad PROPSOED FIRE HYDRANT a, 1 R•. `' a ,, ' _ r /1, r .'�7 Fire Hydrant - - - „4 - - - - - HOSE PULL FROM HYDRANT (180' MAX.) \ Proposed h• / '. f• /�- - - - - - - - - - - HOSE PULL FROM FIRE LANE (150' MAX.) \ Fir* Hydrant •a �� Covered Entrance IS 81 sane / !I _ Vertloal gearanoe. 9ne seat 2 0l 8 •---- - --. proper " k > PROPOSED EMERGENCY KNOW BOX ACCESS GATE _ • -�,` ' R'Le • r - ny El FireHydrarr� c far Typical Covao Entrevaece / . ' DD4Q®�(d1�2 �• / 1 PHn� 292/�® BUILDINGS YR. 2TITS ON-STE GENERAL l ' ACCESS J 32 SUITE RETIREMENT AND EMERGENCY �OQ RESIDENCE \ ) Tranerormef NOTE otctulMw II r +, set Floor 45,372 e.}. $ ! Rnd Floor - 28.288 a t. Gen10 erator nroency - 11 0enorelor FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS VEHICLE TURNING MOVEMENTS AND 1 and Fbor - 98,A33 a.}. /1 poo CIRCULATION - SEE 94TERNAL CIRCULATION PLAN -- _--r 1 Total - 123,693.s, I $ it -1 (Phase one " Propocoo Efe;mrooncy Knox \\ ' ` .'y \ II 5• I 1 sax AccoOAty _ , •,� / P ropo seHyed r r ,, 1i. F / ' ♦♦ / Ftrdrant 11 _ _ _ / Zam (Throe Story) ♦ / Fam / $ �• , yy / i of r A r r / ROJECT NAME LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY Proposed \ = Fua Hydrant a n ��-----_------- /f AP NUMBER• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36405 Pin Lire LAN, EMERGENCY ACCESS AND FIRE HOSE REACH EXHIBIT yr. HIBIT DATE• REVISED JULY 27, 2012 VACAHT q 30' Wide WM / DEVELOPER- HAWTHORN RETIREMENT GROUP oP 9 p o' aa' eo' 120' tso' 1 Pr asad Emar eacy Knox F" Lane A -Pro Deed DpRE$$• 8310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DRIVE, SUITE 200 PHA 292/do \ � � See Sheet 2 of 2 Sax Acceaa Data Fire Hydrant 1 for Cruse S__0an VANCOUVER, WASWING70H 98t182-82TD YR, 999D Prtl 8aed City of La Ou;nts 3landerd No. 227 - �u�� r-.12WIE(R HEDICAL CEF47F.4�° SCALE 1 "=40' p ELEPHONE, 380-2t3-t56D FA%• Sd9-213-f840 • _ � �r30' Yilde' �ooncavla Dr:yeway Appranr-�h� � - � � �®4=R�wr-'D4Q f18E481."CwFR fi."..Bk zARCHITECT, L04TY ARCHITECTURE 1 ML CIE:47M t x 90.ti•"690^DLR9 _ _ DDRES$. 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 1 -M. SM3 / SALEM, OREGON 07301 TELEPHONE. 603-399-1090 FAX• 603-399-0686 REVISION, 1 N(NNEEA, MSA CONSULTING, INC. SHEET PLAtrraso a Cv m 9?MWM aora ■ LAtm Sldevinmoo 1 1. �( a 3' -, 1 •�I` + / 34380 Bole Hoyle Dtmrle a RANow Maude ■ CA 92270 of 0 1 1 1 SHEETS c Ta.m49MR (7W 32O.9B)1 a FAx (760) 323-7893 y JLNJAN A. DE u r0I1RE PC 043850 SHEETS „fil s REBwerruLTrwN.�o,wL a : GOMM6TCIALYVMUN.�UMA]L � DUSTS OR S NOTREOUIREO NOTES: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS'B"CONCRETE. 2 2to, l!@fGM vB REOUIREO BETVEYN ORIVEWAY$%vaom ANY ONE SECTION A -A PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD (NO PARKING) T"=5. OR EK, BLOCK WALL (EAST NLY / ALONG THE RLY AND SOUTHERLY P/L A ETNNING WALL WITH A 42- ON TOP MAY BE REQUIRED UAIN AREAS Rrimolls, Ex. PA APPROVES ti - A 'Y” aruloAnu CHRIS A. VOGT 22 � EXISTING LA O1.IIN7A CITY ENGINEER CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DOG PARK REPLACE DM. NO RCE 44250 APPROACH SNEET I OF 1 ''110�Jp°°G � �• YAlacs PROPOSED ASSISTED TYPiCAL�lRE �G�ESS_ROAD DRivewnr W51L LIVING SUITES N.T.S. �� o rRviEcr wRLtcE 1 o a - • ---- CREATE DRAINAGE COLLECTION SWALE AND DIRECT FLOWS TO THE EXISTING ORAN PROPOSED ACKER-STONE "CHECKER BLOCK" INLET AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. PAVERS WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE IN VOIDS (DESIGNED TO CARRY 80,000 lb- FIRE TRUCK) SECTION B-B PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD (NO PARKING) T"=I0' NOTE, ENTRY CANOPY TO BE SPRINKLED PER NFPA 13. ROUTE SPRINKLER PIPING FROM LOWER ROOF TO SECTION LARGE COLUMN TO UPPER ROOF, NO EXCEPTIONS. fCOVEREC ENTRY CANOPY,' TYPICAL COVERED ENTRY ELEVATION NIT-S COLD BROOK LANE I I WHOLE F& LV RE29DDEM7P&L - 20996 MO. 7 'TRP I I / / 80"U-007 004.an-00a Emergency S®4=q93=000 ! 00"13-002 I 60"13.0811 004-"3-009 604-"3.002 I 008-909 posed Emrgency Knox I I TN. I W S®4=ga31-02q } Hammerhead \ 2B Wlde Flre Lane $*"g L Box Access Gets / Turn -Around posed Zero Curb i ' 0 I // L� _ f ~+d, I / ey lri�r ryq �bC4�OLEFA�JLSf F3E3■DEFI4UAL 4 a• �; L m I 4G�A04 M®. 23059� 32 BED MEMORY CARE TaaBhiour. Y DUP fon s/ tape F tons story) FACILITY (one Story) 2s, Wide (Oea Story) Fire Lane (Phase Two) Pallet t Corse, Rod Te meeparking f SetOtWrp 004-431-022 / Be \ 7R.23S0�i / C 7V OF LA OL<9 NTA (Two Story) (Two Story) PMEEER MARK 4fRi. 3999rE r ��i i ([•., l \ '� / orTV � / � /r , ` y\ L\` 26' Wide Fire Lane // / ` Parking Btal Ol 72 SUITE ASSISTED LIVING (Two Story) �� • / �~ miree story) RESIDENCE r tr,—W (0" and two Story) Two) _ rT` r �lF � o(Phasoo r ��, LEGEND \ TV (Fwa Story) Proposed Emergency Knox Box Access Get. fff---III ��r Proposed rty= Zero Curb I l C-- • LEI N ♦ f :r 1 ■ / agx ` a / Bra • �:= � .l,. aLlt Cw . �., �' — = :c •f/ � ✓ r f Pu'�7i 292/0® - r � R�sinlot _ — wr =� � � �' � �/ r / 4L9. 39990 — arkirr / l 0 — ~ / _ _ _ r r r. • _ _— � > 132 SUITE RETIREMENT O R J PAN tTaur6s )�r r ! * L RESIDENCE N/ / rranency GeAener�etor Red Restrict 1 (Three Story) (Phase One) 1 1 t , , wtiR ►Pr I ParkNg S!d a RypkW i W Pr ppA Emergency Knox Box Aooaae Gate Sall / / 7rldng aw" Story) Pod �- sstl Emerpsnoy AaCyi Gsrs f r fFtl / 30' WideO Fire Lane 0' r0' e0' 120' mo' \ r 30' Wide dAOAM4 Fire LaneSCALE —tell 1"=40' a()q=030=050 \ 1 Proposed Emergency Knox EOSENca®597E6',l NEDoCAL CENTER PMO 212/60 f 11 Box Access Gate 47d. 39995 L Propbaad 30' ConcrMe Odyaway Approaek_ 4 b X EISISIMMWOR WEDICAL CENTEIROA ' L ►A TR.39493 y TWO-WAY TRAFFIC FORWARD IN / BACK OUT \ \ ONE WAY IN / ONE WAY OUT a.5' x 40' VEHICLE (REPRESENTING A FIRE TRUCK, DELIVERY TRUCK. COACH BUS, AND TRASH TRUCK) FRONT TIRES - PATH OF TRAVEL REAR TIRES - PATH OF TRAVEL aBUILDINGS ON -SITE GENERAL CIRCULATION AND EMERGENCY ACCESS / OFF -SITE CIRCULATION AND EMERGENCY ACCESS EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY NOTES SEE ARCHITECT'S PLANS FOR SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS AND TRASH ENCLOSURE AREAS SCREENING OPTIONS. TURNING RADII FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES MEET THE INSIDE RADIUS / REQUIREMENT OF 31' MNMUM AND OUTSIDE RADIUS OF 52' MINIMUM / / / ROJECT NAME, LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY IAP NUMBER- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36405 LAN. INTERNAL CIRCULATION PLAN %We1T DATIR• REVISED- JULY 27, 20t2 WNER / DEVELOPER. HAWTHORN RETIREMENT GROUP DDRESS. 9310 NE VANCOUVER MALL DRIVE. SUITE 200 VANCOUVER. WASHNG:TON 968t32-6210 ELEPHONi 360-213-1550 FAX- Sao-213-1R4o RCHITECT- LENITY ARCHITECTURE WIRES& 471 HIGH STREET SE, SUITE 10 SALEM, OREGION 97301 ELEPFIONE- 503-S99-1090 I FAX. 503-m-0695 MSA CONSULTING, INC. SHEET PLANNRIa ■ Cry ENowEEEEro ■ LA SrmvBma 1 34200 BOB HorE DRrve a RANcHo MutAm ■ CA 92270 7%LEPHONe (760) 320-9811 ■ FAx (760) 323-7893 JULIAN A. DE LA TORRE PE C43880 Ds 1 SHEETS ATTACHMENT 2 BI # A �ot4a" ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.2011-921 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE, LP ARCHITECT: LENITY GROUP, LLC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LENITY GROUP, LLC ENGINEER: MSA CONSULTING, INC. REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF SITE, ARCHITECTURAL, AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LOCATION: SEELEY DRIVE, EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET, SOUTH OF MILES AVENUE, WITHIN CENTRE POINTE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MEDIUM. HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: SURROUNDING . ZONING/LAND USES: MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RMH). NORTH: PARKS AND RECREATION (P) EXISTING COMMUNITY PARK FACILITY SOUTH: OFFICE COMMERCIAL (0) VACANT, UN -ENTITLED LAND EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WEST: OFFICE COMMERCIAL (0) rr EXISTING MEDICAL HEALTH CENTER 527 PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of a Site Development Permit is to provide specific design review of a project's proposed architecture and- landscaping. The Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee's (ALRC) role in reviewing this type of application is to provide the Planning Commission with a recommendation regarding the design of the proposed project and its compliance with the City's various development regulations. When reviewing applications, the ALRC is responsible for reviewing site design, architectural design, and landscape design. Site related items include exterior lighting fixtures, project entries, streetscape, water features, .pedestrian circulation, and similar amenities. Architectural items for review include, building mass, scale, architectural style, and aesthetic details, including materials, roof style, and colors. Landscape review includes plant types, plant location and size, landscape screening of equipment and undesirable views, and the emphasis of prominent design features. Such coordinated review is necessary to promote a unifying project design, compatibility with other surrounding uses, and aesthetic consistency with existing architecture and the level of quality prevalent in the community. Once reviewed, the ALRC's recommendation will be included in the staff report presented to the Planning Commission. PROPOSAL The La Quints Retirement Community, an approximately 9.5-acre senior retirement community, is proposed to be located along Seeley Drive, east of Washington Street, south of Miles Avenue, within the Centre Pointe commercial development (Attachment 1). The proposed community consists of the following.facilities: • Three-story retirement facility . Two-story assisted living facility • Four duplex cottage units • One-story memory care facility Two development phases are proposed. The first phase consists of the retirement facility and duplex units, along with parking and landscaping. The second phase consists of the assisted living and memory care facility. .Project Overview: The project site is currently vacant, with no active entitlements. Located directly to the north of the project site is Pioneer Park. An existing single-family residential neighborhood, Desert Pride, is located to the east of the project site. Vacant, un- entitled property is located to the south of the project site. An existing medical health center is located directly to the west of the project site (Attachment 1, Sheet A-1 - A-2). 2 ,n b The configuration of the La Quinta Retirement Community consists of multiple buildings located along a central drive aisle. The main building, the three-story Retirement Residence, has the following characteristics (Attachment 1, Sheet A-14 - A-16): • Approximately 123,000 square foot congregate care facility • Studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom units (132 suites; 146 beds) • Community dining area, activity/multi-purpose rooms, entertainment rooms • Meals, housekeeping, van transportation, social activities included • Resident: average age 82; ambulatory (medical/nursing care not provided) The four single -story Duplex Cottage units have the following characteristics (Attachment 1,,Sheet A-23 - A-24): • Approximately 2,600 square feet (master bedroom and guest bedroom/den) • Great room, kitchen, laundry room, covered patio, one -car garage • Resident: slightly younger population (main building services also offered) The two-story Assisted Living Facility (ALF) with Memory Care Unit (ALZ) has the following characteristics (Attachment 1, Sheet A-21 - A722): • Approximately 77,000 square foot facility • ALF includes studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom units (72 suites; 73 beds) o Dining area,. activity room, lounge area o Resident: seniors in need of assistance, but not nursing home • ALZ includes private and semi -private suites (17 suites; 32 beds) o Meals, housekeeping, van transportation included o Resident: seniors with memory loss needs (medications/routines) Site Design: There is a single access point identified for the proposed La Quinta Retirement Community: off Seeley Drive, adjoining the, existing roundabout (Attachment 1, Sheet A-1). This access will serve as the primary access for residents, guests, and employees, as well as,for delivery and service vehicles. Vehicular circulation within the community consists of a singular drive aisle that meanders through the center of the community (Attachment 1, Sheet A-0). The majority of parking stalls for the project are located along this drive aisle, as well as access to the cottage units and the service/delivery areas for the Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facility. A Fire Department access is located on Seeley Drive, and gated fire access roads surround much of the perimeter of the property. When not in use by the Fire Department, the access roads will be utilized• as pedestrian -friendly walking areas. A total of .135 parking spaces are proposed, including two community -van spaces, 3 529 eight ADA-accessible spacesr and 24 covered parking spaces. The illuminated steel carport structures are approximately 10'-4" in height, and will be painted to match the buildings (Attachment 1, Sheet A-251. The vehicular drive aisle and parking areas are proposed to be, lit with 21-foot tall pole lights (Attachment 1, Sheet A-8). The parking lamps are 250-watt metal halide lamps that are frosted, shielded, and directed downward. Also included with this proposal are plans for common areas and amenities (Attachment 1, Sheet A-0). These areas include multiple courtyard patio areas, a swimming pool area, a community garden with raised planters, and an artificial turf putting green. A water feature is proposed near the main entrance to the Retirement Residence (Attachment 1, Sheet A-1). The feature consists of a three tiered fountain with a stone base (Attachment 1, Sheet A-28). Architectural Design: Included with this proposal are architectural plans for the main buildings and duplex cottage units, which have been designed to reflect a Desert Contemporary theme (Attachment 1, Sheet A-10 - Al2a). This includes architectural elements such as the use of stucco as the primary exterior building material, the use of flat roofing, stacked stone, metal awnings, and incorporating shades of tan and brown. Additionally, balconies, shade trellises, and other design elements provide architectural articulation to the various building facades. The main building, the three-story Retirement Residence, incorporates varying rooflines, with the height of the building, not including the parapet screen walls, averaging approximately 35 feet in height a4 its highest ridgelines (Attachment 1, Sheet A-10). The mechanical equipment, parapet screen walls average 3-4 feet in height. The height of the single -story Duplex Cottage units, at the highest roof ridgeline, is approximately 17'-2" (Attachment 1, Sheet A-23 - A-24). The Assisted Living Facility with Memory Care Unit is designed with the two-story Assisted Living Facility element situated near the center of the proposed community, and the single -story memory care element situated along the eastern property line, adjacent to the existing single-family homes Attachment 1, Sheet A- 18 - A-19a). The height of the two-story Assisted Living Facility averages approximately 22 feet in height. The height of the single -story Memory Care Unit averages 12 feet in height. Landscaping: Landscaping throughout the project site consists of primarily desert and other low. - to moderate -water use plants (Attachment 1, Sheet A-3 - A-5). Mostly utilized around the buildings are various trees and shrubs, with minimal use of turf, which 4 530 has been limited to a community lawn activity area, areas surrounding the Duplex Cottage units, and adjoining pedestrian pathways. The proposed tree palette includes Tipu trees, Mesquite, Palo Verdes, as well as Date, Mediterranean, and California Fan Palms. The shrub. palette includes Yucca, Birds of Paradise, and Sage, among others (Attachment 1, Sheet A-5).. At two locations. along the project perimeter, a meandering screen wall is proposed (Attachment 1, Sheet A-1 - A-2), Located along a portion of Seeley Drive and the southern property line, the purpose of the walls is to screen views into and out of the rear yards of the proposed duplex units. The screen walls, which consist of block walls with stone veneer, will be approximately X-6" in height. Also included in the development plans are a proposed masonry pool wall and fencing for the memory care facility (Attachment 1, Sheet A-5). The applicant is .also proposing landscape lighting at various locations throughout the project site (Attachment 1, Sheet A-6 — A-8). Walkway lights are to be placed along the numerous pedestrian walking paths throughout the site. Wall -washer lighting fixtures will also be strategically placed on walls throughout the site. ANALYSIS Staff finds the overall design of the proposed La Quinta Retirement Community to be acceptable. Initially, staff had a number of concerns with the site design and architecture; however, the applicant has .sufficiently addressed most of the concerns, as detailed in the analysis below. Site Design: The design of the vehicular access points, internal circulation, and parking areas is generally acceptable. Within the project, all applicable .turning radii for large vehicles, loading/unloading areas, and pedestrian connectivity meet the La Quinta Municipal Code development standards. The main drive aisle for the project has a clear separation between vehicular and pedestrian paths of travel. The proposed walkways that run . throughout the community are sufficient as . they provide connectivity throughout the project site. Staff suggested that the existing Eisenhower Health Center driveway to the west be utilized as a shared fire access road, rather than constructing a new road adjacent and parallel to the existing road. However, an agreement with the Eisenhower Health Center to allow shared use of the driveway could not be reached. Based on the parking requirements in LQMC Section 9.150.060 and the parking analysis done as part of the review process, staff has determined that the proposed parking area design and spaces provided within the La Quinta Retirement Community can adequately accommodate the proposed use. The proposal provides ;g 531 for 135 parking spaces, which does not meet the 208 parking spaces required by the Municipal Code. Staff was primarily concerned with visitor parking and employee shift changes. However, the applicant has provided information regarding the proposed parking ratios based on past experience with this type of land use, which has historically shown that only 20% of independent living residents and 5% of assisted living residents bring vehicles to the community, and that most residents utilize the community van for transportation needs. Furthermore, the applicant has stated that the largest employee shift.change would require 32 parking spaces, which coupled with the number of spaces accounted for residents with cars, result in approximately 90 parking spaces available for guest parking. The applicant also provided staff with addresses of numerous facilities they have constructed with similar unit counts and parking ratios. Through online resources, staff confirmed the parking ratios at the existing facilities, and has concluded that the proposed parking ratio should be sufficient. With regards to the Duplex Cottage units located along Seeley Drive, near the main entrance of the community, staff had some initial concern with the location and layout of the proposed units. In particular, the placement of cottage units in such an isolated location, away from the other cottage units located on the opposite side of the property, was questioned. Also, the layout of the building was oriented in such a way that rear yard areas would be exposed to public view. In response,.the applicant has stated that the proposed layout is operationally successful, and a rear yard screen wall has been incorporated in order to minimize views into and out of the rear yards. Staff remains concerned with the location of the isolated duplex units. Other outstanding site planning details that staff has some concern about include: • Potential odor issues due to the proximity of proposed trash enclosures to Proposed Cottage Duplex units and existing single-family residential homes • Design and adequacy of the proposed service/delivery area for the Retirement Residence Staff recommends that the ALRC discuss these issues. Architectural Design: The Desert Contemporary architecture and layout of the project site is for the most part compatible with the surrounding land uses. Because the existing buildings within the Centre Pointe development near the proposed facility are of a Modern and Mediterranean/Spanish architectural style, the Desert Contemporary style does not conflict with the surrounding built environment. Enough architectural articulations enhance the buildings, and the height, mass, and scale of the buildings are appropriate for the proposed location. 11 532 Furthermore, the visual impact of the three-story Retirement Residence is minimized from view from the existing residential neighborhood to the east (Attachment 1, Sheet A-27). The building is set back over 180 feet from the closest existing residence to the east, and review of the eastern property line transition plan shows that the Duplex Cottage units and the segments of the Assisted Living Facility closest to the property line have minimal visual impact on the existing residential neighborhood due to massing; height, and landscaping buffers: There was initial concern regarding the use of the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioning (PTAC) units throughout the community. In particular, staff believes that use of the PTAC units result in an undesirable aesthetic impact on the architecture of the buildings and noise impact on the existing built environment. However, the applicant has proposed to incorporate decorative screens and grates to minimize the impact of the PTAC units standing out from the building elevations. Also, the applicant has provided information regarding decibel levels of the PTAC units, and noise impact on the existing built environment should be minimal. Other outstanding architectural plan details that staff has some concern about include: • The lack of architectural detail for all building elevations of the Assisted Living Facility/Memory Care Unit • The lack of architectural detail on the rear elevation of .the van garage Staff recommends that the ALRC discuss these issues. Landscaping: The proposed landscape palette is acceptable. The assorted species of plants provide diversity and add character to the proposed buildings. The proposed plant palette reflects the Desert Contemporary architectural style, while providing sufficient screening and accents around the project site, including the parking lot area, .pedestrian circulation areas, and outdoor use areas. Minimum open space, shading, and screening requirements have been met, and the proposed turf installation around the project site is acceptable as it will be utilized in a pedestrian - oriented environment and meets the City's water efficiency ordinance requirements. The proposed water feature can be permitted if it meets the City's water efficiency requirements. Staff has provided a Condition of Approval pertaining to water features, requiring energy efficient pumps and staff review to ensure that there will be minimal water loss due to splashing, evaporation, and compliance with water use calculation requirements. The small-scale water feature located near the main entrance of the Retirement Residence is appropriate in that its placement and scale is..beneficial...to.wards-the-pedestrian atmosphere — -- ------ _.:_._ _._------------- .... ... ......___... 7 533 The proposed on -site lighting is acceptable, as the proposed fixtures are consistent with the City's outdoor lighting ordinance. Parking areas will be sufficiently lit by the strategically -placed poles and carport lights. All lighting will be designed and located so as to confine direct light within the community boundaries. The submitted photometric plan confirms that the project will be properly illuminated, with a lack of excess light and no illuminated hotspots. 6ECOM.MENDATION That the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee recommend approval of Site Development Permit 2011-919 to the Planning Commission, subject to the attached CoNj.tiogs of-Apprc ual: by: Plan sr Attachments: 1. La Quints Retirement Community Site Development Permit Packet 584 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 1. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 2. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and. setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 3. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LOMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 4. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans to the Planning Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 21 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 5. All water features shall be designed to minimize. "splash", and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. f3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 7.. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Planning Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Director and/or City Engineer. 9 535 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011-921 LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY SEPTEMBER 13,2012 8. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in .the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 10 ... 5,0 A l l AC:HMLN 1 3 STAFF REPORT PH # A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 CASE NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2003-006 AMENDMENT 4, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011-617, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2011-123, ZONE CHANGE 2011-140, SPECIFIC PLAN 2001-055 AMENDMENT 3, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 36405, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2011- 921 APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE, LP ARCHITECT: LENITY GROUP, LLC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LENITY GROUP, LLC ENGINEER: MSA CONSULTING, INC. REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY LOCATION: SEELEY DRIVE, EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET, SOUTH OF MILES AVENUE, WITHIN CENTRE POINTE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: THE LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011-617 FOR THIS PROJECT, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OE THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE PLANNING DIRECTOR HAS DETERMINED THAT ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED PROJECT COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, THERE WILL NOT BE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT IN THIS CASE BECAUSE REVISIONS IN THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN MADE BY OR AGREED TO BY THE PROJECT PROPONENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED. THEREFORE, THE PLANNING DIRECTOR IS RECOMMENDING THAT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BE CERTIFIED. PAReports - PC\2012\PC_9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNIM01 LQRC REPORT,docx Page 1 of 10 537 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR) MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RMH) NORTH: PARKS AND RECREATION (P) EXISTING COMMUNITY PARK FACILITY SOUTH: OFFICE COMMERCIAL 101 - VACANT, UN -ENTITLED LAND EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WEST: OFFICE COMMERCIAL (0) EXISTING MEDICAL HEALTH CENTER RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission resolutions recommending to the City Council: • Certification of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Assessment 2011- 617 • Approval of Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 3 • Approval of General Plan Amendment 2011-123 • Approval of Zone Change 2011-140 • Approval of Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3 • Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 36405 • Approval of Site Development Permit 2011-921 subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval.. - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The proposed La Quinta Retirement Community is located within the Centre Pointe commercial development. The community consists of a 123,000 square foot congregate care facility, four independent living duplex cottage units, and a 77,000 square foot assisted living facility/memory care facility. A single access point is identified for the proposed community, off Seeley Drive, adjoining the existing roundabout. PAReports - PC\2012\PC 9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.doex Page 2 of 10 - 538 In addition to the site development plans, multiple applications are included in the development proposal: • Development Agreement Amendment o Amend existing agreement to be consistent with proposed land use • General Plan Amendment/Zone Change o Increase density from Medium Density Residential (8 du/acre) to Medium High Density Residential (12 du/acre) • Specific Plan Amendment o Amend existing specific plan to be consistent with proposed land use o Propose multiple deviations to development standards • Tentative Parcel Map o Subdivide property into parcels consistent with project financing plan Initially, staff had a variety of concerns regarding the site design and architectural style of the La Quints Retirement Community. In particular, the isolated duplex units located near the entrance of the community, the reduced number of parking spaces provided, trash enclosure locations, and the utilization of Packaged Terminal Air Conditioning units were questioned. However, the applicant has provided sufficient operational data and site/architectural enhancements to alleviate all of staff's concern. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The La Quinta Retirement Community, an approximately 9.5-acre senior retirement community, consists of a three-story retirement facility, four duplex cottage units, a two-story assisted living facility,,a one-story memory care facility The main building, the three-story Retirement Residence, has the following characteristics: • Approximately 123,000 square foot congregate care facility • Studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom units (132 suites; 146 beds) • Community dining area, activity/multi-purpose rooms, . entertainment rooms • Meals, housekeeping, van transportation, social activities included • Resident: average age 82; ambulatory (medical/nursing care not provided) The four single -story Duplex Cottage units have the following characteristics: • Approximately 2,600 square feet (master bedroom and guest bedroom/den) • Great room, kitchen, laundry room, covered patio, one -car garage • Resident: slightly younger population (main building services also offered) The two-story Assisted Living Facility (ALF) with Memory Care Unit (ALZ) has the following characteristics: • Approximately 77,000 square foot facility • ALF includes studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom units (72 suites; 73 beds) PAReports - PC\2012\PC 9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 3 of 10 5.3 9 o Dining area, activity room, lounge area o Resident: seniors in need of assistance, but not nursing home • ALZ includes private and semi -private suites (17 suites; 32 beds) o Meals, housekeeping, van transportation included o Resident: seniors with memory loss needs (medications/routines) Two development phases are proposed. The first phase consists of the retirement facility and duplex units, along with parking and landscaping. The second phase consists of the assisted living and memory care facility. The project site is currently vacant, with no active entitlements. Located directly to the north of the project site is Pioneer Park. An existing single-family residential neighborhood, Desert Pride, is located to the east of the project site. Vacant, un- entitled property is located to the south of the project site. An existing medical health center is located directly to the west of the project site. For detailed information regarding building/community characteristics, site design, architectural design, and the landscaping plan, the site development booklet and the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee staff report are attached for reference (Attachment 1 and Attachment 2) Development Agreement Amendment: The existing Development Agreement is being amended to reflect the proposed changes to the project. The amended Agreement has been prepared by the City Attorney's office and requires review and approval by the City Council after recommendation by the Planning Commission. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change: The project site iscurrently zoned Medium Density Residential, which permits a density of up to 8 du/acre. The purpose of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change is to bring the La Quinta General Plan and Zoning land use designations of the project site into consistency with the"proposed density (Attachment 3). The proposed density, using an "equivalent unit density" calculation, results in a density of 10 du/acre. Equivalent unit density, which equates density calculated through number of residents rather than reliance on the term "unit", can be utilized due to the proposed use, a senior retirement community with independent, assisted and memory care units, with a majority of single occupancy units. The expected population for the La Quinta Retirement Community is 252 persons, which calculates to 10 du/acre. Therefore, Medium High Density Residential, with a maximum density of 12 du/acre, is required. The proposed density and subsequent General Plan Amendment and Zone Change P:\Reports - PC\2012\PC_9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITV\01 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 4 of 10 540 will not have an impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. Specific Plan Amendment: The applicant has proposed a Specific Plan Amendment (Attachment 4). This represents the third amendment to the original Centre Pointe Specific Plan, and includes detailed development principles and design guidelines in order to develop the community as proposed. The Specific Plan Amendment also includes details regarding a number of deviations from La Quinta Municipal Code standards. The proposed amended Specific Plan proposes the following deviations from the La Quinta Municipal Code: Proposed CUltria Poirtts ':,' Carkint Centre Palnte La Quints Municipal Code Development Ftand'ard oevelgpment Standard -:'; DeVEl4pment Standard. I' Madmom Structure`Netgtit 40 feet 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Number of stories 3 2 2 (ndn. 145 feet from east PL)- Mlnimum LWIng Area (Single FaplggAttachedl. .. 1,100 square feet 1,200 square feet 1,400 square feet eullding Lot Colierage 70% 60% 60% P.arkligLotDesign.-. No standard n/a All units are within 100 feet :. - -. '-',- ------ of the nearest guest space Duplex Parking _ 1 Garage Space ♦ 2 Garage Spaces + 2 Garage Spaces + _ 1 Guest Space 1 Guest Space 1 Guest Space Required Parking 134 spaces n/a 204 spaces The proposed amendment to the Centre Pointe Specific Plan is acceptable as it ensures that the project can be constructed as proposed. Although the applicant has proposed a variety of deviations from the La Quinta Municipal Code, staff believes that the appropriate justification has been given to consider and approve the requests. For example, the reduction in minimum unit size is requested due to the inclusion of common kitchen and dining facilities. The added height is needed to facilitate the community's architectural design. The relief from the distance -to -guest space requirement is requested as a result of the project's design, due to the fact that all visitors are to enter from the main reception areas. Staff recommends the Planning Commission review the proposed amendment to the Centre Pointe Specific Plan, particularly the multiple requests for deviations from the La Quinta Municipal Code, and discuss any areas of concern. PAReports - PC\2012\PC 9-25-121LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 5 of 10 541 Tentative Parcel Map: The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into two parcels (Attachment 5). Parcel 1, at approximately ,3:54 acres, consists primarily of all the Assisted Living/Memory Care Facility. Parcel 2, at approximately 5.83 acres, consists primarily of the Retirement Residence and Duplex Cottage units. The intention of the Tentative Parcel Map is for financing purposes. The design of the proposed map, as conditioned, generally conforms to the design guidelines and standards of the City of La Quinta General Plan for Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) designated properties, as set forth in the Land Use Element. The proposed site design incorporates street and parcel designs that are in conformance with applicable General Plan goals, policies, and development standards, and will provide adequate circulation, infrastructure, and utilities. Site Development Permit: Site Design The design of the vehicular access points, internal circulation, and parking areas is generally acceptable. Within the project, all applicable turning radii for large vehicles, loading/unloading areas, and pedestrian connectivity meet the La Quinta Municipal Code development standards. The main drive aisle for the project has a clear separation between vehicular and pedestrian paths of travel. The proposed walkways that run throughout the community are sufficient as they provide connectivity throughout the project site. Staff suggested that the existing Eisenhower Health Center driveway to the west be utilized as a shared fire access road, rather than constructing a new road adjacent and parallel to the existing road. However, an agreement with the Eisenhower Health Center to allow shared use of the driveway could not be reached. Based on the parking requirements in, LQMC Section 9.150.060 and the parking analysis done as part of the review process, staff has determined that the proposed parking area design and spaces provided within the La Quinta Retirement Community can adequately accommodate the proposed use. The proposal provides for 135 parking spaces, which does not meet the 208 parking spaces required by the Municipal Code. Staff was primarily concerned with visitor parking and employee shift changes. However, the applicant has provided information regarding the proposed parking ratios based on past experience with this type of land use, which has historically shown that only 20% of independent living residents and 5% of assisted living residents bring vehicles to the community, and that most residents utilize the community van for transportation needs. Furthermore, the applicant has stated that the largest employee shift change would require 32 parking spaces, which coupled with the number of spaces accounted for PAReports - PC\2012\PC 9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\O1 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 6 of 10 1) 5 4 f residents with cars, result in approximately 90 parking spaces available for guest parking. The applicant also provided staff with addresses of numerous facilities they have constructed with similar unit counts and parking ratios. Through online resources, staff confirmed the parking ratios at the existing facilities, and has concluded that the proposed parking ratio should be sufficient. The proposed parking ratios have been included in the Specific Plan Development Standards. Staff initially had some concern with the location and layout of the proposed Duplex Cottage units located along Seeley Drive, near the main entrance of the community. In particular, the placement of cottage units in such an isolated location, away from the other cottage units located on the opposite side of the property, was questioned. Also, the layout of the building was oriented in such a way that rear yard areas would be exposed to public view. In response, a rear yard screen wall has been incorporated in order to minimize views into and out of the rear yards. With regards to the isolation of the units, the applicant has stated that the proposed layout is operationally successful and maintained their desire for units at the proposed location. As the applicant is confident that the isolated units will not prevent the residents from using the amenities of the Retirement Residences, and the relocation of the units would necessitate a significant redesign of the project site, staff has accepted the design as proposed. Architectural Design The Desert Contemporary architecture and layout of the project site is for the most part compatible with the surrounding land uses. Because the existing buildings within the Centre Pointe development near the proposed facility are of a Modern and Mediterranean/Spanish architectural style, the Desert Contemporary style does not conflict with the surrounding built environment. Enough architectural articulations enhance the buildings, and the height, mass, and scale of the buildings are appropriate for the proposed location. Furthermore, the visual impact of the three-story Retirement Residence is minimized from view from the existing residential neighborhood to the east. The building is set back over 180 feet from the closest existing residence to the east, and review of the eastern property line transition plan shows that the Duplex Cottage units and the segments of the Assisted Living Facility closest to the property line have minimal visual impact on the existing residential neighborhood due to massing, height, and landscaping buffers (Attachment 1, Sheet A-27). There was initial concern regarding the use of the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioning (PTAC) units throughout the community. In particular, staff believes that use of the PTAC units result in an undesirable aesthetic impact on the architecture of the buildings and noise impact on the existing built environment. However, the applicant has proposed to incorporate decorative screens and grates PAReports - PC\2012\PC_9-25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 7 of 10 543 to minimize the impact of the PTAC units standing out from the building elevations. Also, the applicant has provided information regarding decibel levels of the PTAC units that indicate that noise impact on the existing built environment should be minimal. Landscaping The proposed landscape palette is acceptable (Attachment 1, Sheet A-5). The assorted species of plants provide diversity and add character to the proposed buildings. The proposed plant palette reflects the Desert Contemporary architectural style, while providing sufficient screening and accents around the project site, including the parking lot area, pedestrian circulation areas, and outdoor use areas. Minimum open space, shading, and screening requirements have been met, and the proposed turf installation around the project site is acceptable as it will be utilized in a pedestrian -oriented environment and meets the City's water efficiency ordinance requrrements. The proposed water feature can be permitted if it meets the City's water efficiency requirements. Staff has provided a Condition of Approval pertaining to water features, requiring energy efficient pumps and staff review to ensure that there will be minimal water loss due to splashing, evaporation, and compliance with water use calculation requirements. The small-scale water feature located near the main entrance of the Retirement Residence is appropriate in that its placement and scale is beneficial towards the pedestrian atmosphere. The proposed on -site lighting is acceptable, as the proposed fixtures are consistent with the City's outdoor lighting ordinance. Parking areas will be sufficiently lit by the strategically -placed poles and carport lights. All lighting will be designed and located so as to confine direct light within the community boundaries. The submitted photometric plan confirms that the project will be properly illuminated, with a lack of excess light and no illuminated hotspots. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on January 19, 2012. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Planning Department. All applicable comments have been incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. SB-18 Native American Tribal Consultation: PAReports - PC\2012\PC_9-25.12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.docx Page 8 of 10 ft 544 As per SB-18 (2004) consultation requirements, information regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan was forwarded to those Tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Staff has followed up with all Tribes requesting information or consultation and placed their recommendations for monitoring in the Conditions of Approval. Neighborhood Meeting: On July 11, 2012, the applicant presented their proposal at a neighborhood meeting. Notices for the informational meeting were sent out to properties within 500 feet of the project site. Approximately ten people showed up to the meeting. Discussions related to the proposed project primarily focused on the proposed building heights and locations, landscape buffering, and on -going dust control problems. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 14, 2012, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ALRC RECOMMENDATION: On September 13, 2012, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee reviewed these site, architectural, and landscaping plans, and unanimously recommended approval of the site development permit (Attachment 6). The ALRC was generally pleased with the site design, architectural style, and project landscaping. In addition to staff's recommended conditions of approval, the ALRC provided the following suggestions: • Provide additional shade elements/awnings on the main building • Utilize a varying paint color palette for duplex units, similar to other buildings • Add a gazebo structure and sitting area to the putting green • Replace proposed Cork Oak tree with Virginians Oak tree • Use LED bulbs for landscape lighting; pick a different path light fixture • Replace wood trellis structures with "aluma-wood"-type materials The applicant is in the process of evaluating and addressing the ALRC's comments. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW P:\Reports - PC\2012\PC_9.25-12\LQ RETIREMENT COMMUNITY\01 LQRC REPORT.doex Page 9 of 10 545 !� �'�) � r•i ei � ,J � _ � 1 '- K N, t � l:', 1 i� 1.. 3 r r i; � L p'; � t v u r1 LJ 1 � _ { i LDR Wit;� P PALES AVENUE f >w QRt� O I)/Y City of La Quinta r General Plan Land Use Map ha n = N EXISTING GENERAL PLAN USE: W c MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL UP TO 8 DU/AC s PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN USE: MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL UP TO 12 DU/AC LEGEND RESIDENTIAL W-W Very Low Denshy RnMar W UP to 2 duhc 1011 Low Den* RegdWM up to 4 dulac ® Medlum Denafty Residential up to 8 durac Meditan High Denft RUMeMW up to 12 dufae High Density ReelderWal up to 18 dulae VILLAGE COMMERCIAL Q Vibp Commerdd -. NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Q Ragland ConermreW 0 Cmmnurray Commeldd Mahood Co v aieiel Ql Tourlet Commerad - bdudrld OMee Cammerdal Major Commmely FacWka Q� Cornwrdd Park PREPARED POL H A WTHOVP` RETIREMENT GR 9310 NE Vanoouvar Melt Dr., Subs2D0 Vencomr, WA 98W-W0 (350) 213.1550 Fax (300) 213-1540 SPECIAL PURPOSED Q Parke and Rea Odr Course Q OPen Space 0 water LOW Dorsky rWAU W e SPECIAL SYMBOLS i i Wpdde Overlay - City Limil •••-- CHy Sphere Plemdng Areal) S_ PlamdM Areal PREPARED BY. IDMSA CGNSU> TING. INC Frameaa a Crm. Smoomm u LOW Smvsmm MM Boo Hope Dam a Aurae Muamo a CA 92278 Tuamm (76% u0*11 o Fax 04a1 M7M 0 _t4 546 r1 L J City of La Quinta. Official Zoning Map 1,. ...M -' MIL VENUE EXISTING ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED ZONING: MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LEGEND RESIDENTIAL wA Very Low Daoity, Residential AL , Low Density Residential Q Cove Residential Q Medium Density Residendial ®-. Medium Hipp Density Residential ltigh Density Residential VILLAGE COMMERCIAL Q Vmegs Commercial NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ._��. Regional Commercial Q Community Commercial d Neighborhood Commercial Q Tourist Commercial Industrial OObeOommercial major Community Facaign Q Commercial Park PREPARED FOR: HAWTHOR[ RETIREMENT GROUP 9310 NE Vancouver MsIl Dc, Sub 2D0 Vancouver, WA 98662.8210 1360) 213.1550 Fax (360) 213.1540 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Q Parp and Recreation Q Ooll Cows. 0 Open Spree Q Floodplain Low Density AgrkuburelEqueaaian Resbantlat SPECIAL SYMBOLS . Equestrian Oveday ---• City Lim ••— City Sphere Plannng Aft 1 - Planning Area 2 PREPARED 9Y: IDMSA CoNsvc,mo, INc. Piw omm ■ Civo. 9moawuan n Was Somme 30M aw RWa Dews a RAlso m Mauna *CA 92270 Tearoom (7601 37A9e11 a FAX (W 323.7693 547 ATTACHMENT 5 City of La Quinta The Centre Pointe Project Amendment #3 for Specific Plan 2001-055 September 17th 2012 Based on Amendment #2 Adopted November 1, 2005 Prepared for La Quints Retirement Residence Limited Partnership 9310 NE Vancouver Mall Dr. Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98662 P1araing Deperl.nent .11 548 U The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Table of Contents Section 1- Project Overview. ---------------...................- ................................. ------ I Section 2 - Design Guidelines Land Use... - - 5 Development Standards- - --------------------------------6 Land Use Area I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Land Use Area II (Deleted)................. ............................................ ........... 8 LandUse Area 1I.........................................................................................10 Deviations 10 Land Use Area III 12 Land Use Area IV 12 SiteConcept......................................................... ............................13 Architectural Character 13 Landscape------------------------------------------------- --------------- -------------------------------------------------- 14 Art in Public Places ................................................................................................. 16 Sustainability Guidelines __............................................... 16 Section 3 - Development Plan Circulation 17 Wind and Erosion Control 18 Drainage and Flood Control .................. ___ --------------------------------- --....................... 18 Utilities 18 Phasing ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Minor Modifications Land Use Area II ............................................................... 10 Appendix A - General Plan Appendix B - General Plan Policies Associated With Land Use Area II ................... 25 Exhibits 30 ................................................................................................................................. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 2 54y The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Introduction & Purpose The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan is an amendment to a previously adopted Specific Plan that established the philosophy and guidelines for the development of the property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street in the City of La Quinta. The guidelines presented within this document are in accordance with the adopted plan and the City's Zoning Code and General Plan. The guidelines reflect the quality and design desired at the site and conforms to the City's overall goal of preserving, maintaining and enhancing the high quality of life La Quinta residents enjoy. Although the Plan is designed to ensure the quality of the development, it also provides a degree of flexibility to allow future development to respond to the changes in society and the economic marketplace of the region which will inevitably occur over the build out period. In cases where the zoning and development regulations are nonspecific within the document, the zoning and development is guided by the City of La Quinta Zoning ordinance in effect at the time. Enabling Legislation • The authority to prepare, adopt, and implement a Specific Plan is granted to the City of La Quinta by the California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, and Sections 65450 through 65457). • As with General Plans, the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing before it can recommend to the City Council the adoption of a Specific Plan or an amendment thereto. The City Council of La Quinta may adopt a Specific Plan and/or amendment to the Specific Plan by either ordinance or resolution. • The Specific Plan is a regulatory document that, once adopted, will amend the Zoning Ordinance, and serve as the Development Code for the Development Site. Upon completion of the Specific Plan adoption process, future development must be consistent with the Specific Plan and amendments thereto. The Property Main access to La Quinta is achieved by traveling south on Washington Street from Interstate 10. The approximate 50-acre subject property is situated at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street, a major entry point to the City. The property is bound by the Coachella Valley Storrmwater Channel to the south, the Del Oro subdivision and vacant residential land to the north and the Inco Century single-family subdivision to the east. The vacant desert land is surrounded by uninterrupted views of the Santa Rosa Coral Reef Mountains and the Little San Bernardino Mountain Range. An aerial photo of the property is provided in Exhibit A. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 3 550 11 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan The Ownership The subject property, consisting of parcel numbers 604-04-12, 604-04-13, 604-04-23 and 604- 04-37 with multiple owners. Development Vision The City has envisioned a development that would welcome incoming tourists, residents and passer-bys into the community of La Quinta. The site serves as the "front door" to the community and should be considered a location that defines the character of La Quinta. The landscape, architecture, design and integrity should reflect the pride and history of the community and shall be developed with the utmost quality and creativity. The design guidelines and development plan described in this document sets the stage for the development of the following: • A commercial component consisting of a resort style hotel, timeshares, condominiums, up -scale restaurants sewing the residents of the community and the guests of the resort and commercial/retail uses. • An office component for the development of a medical -surgical facility. C A senior housing component consisting of congregate care, assisted living, memory care and cottages. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 4 551 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Ip LI Land Use Land Use Plan The property is currently divided into four land use categories: Tourist Commercial, Park, Office, and Medium Density Residential as depicted in the figure below: Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 5 559 The Centre Pointe Proiect SDecific Plan City of La Quinta Approval of this amendment to the Specific Plan would change the current land use to contain approximately 16.2 acres of Tourist Commercial, 9.45 acres of Medium High Density Residential allowing up to 12 dwelling units per acre, 13.5 acres of medical office, 2.70 acres of Park and a .52 acre well site. The figure below presents the revised land use plan for the development. Zoning and Development Standards The following section establishes the zoning and development standards for the four land use areas within the development. These standards shall guide design and development of the landscape, architecture and site within the development area. Land Use Areas I through IV are illustrated in the following fiaure: Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 6 553 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta 40 Land Use Area I The permitted land uses and development standards for the 16.2 acre Land Use Area I area designated as Tourist Commercial (TC) on the Land Use Plan. A. Purpose: To provide for the development and regulation of a narrow range of specialized commercial uses oriented to tourist and resort activity. Representative land uses include a destination resort hotel, timeshares, condominiums, eating and drinking establishments and accessory commercial/retail shops. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the TC Zoning District of this Specific Plan. 1. Resort style hotel with up to three stories, including pool, tennis courts and other hotel amenities. 2. Resort style condominium/casitas*, including pool, tennis courts and other resort amenities. 3. Timeshare with a conditional use permit (CUP). 4. Restaurant uses, with the exception of fast food or drive through facilities. *Resort style condominiums are individual ownership condominiums usually purchased as vacation units or second homes. When vacant, the condominiums may be rented on a nightly or weekly basis, and all such rentals shall be subject to payment of transient occupancy tax (TOT) in accordance with ordinance of the City of La Quinta. The Hotel may provide a program of 40 management services which condominium owners may utilize to facilitate the rental of their individual units and payment of applicable TOT to the City. Tourist Commercial Development Standards Minimum - Maximum building site (acres) 1�lICIPiL.L'CaL.11i^ 16-50 Hotel - Maximum building height (ft.) 40 Hotel - Maximum number of stories 3 Resort Casitas - Maximum building height (ft.) 33* Resort Casitas - Maximum number of stories 2 Structure height within first 150 feet along Washington St. 22 ft Setbacks: Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Washington Street 20 Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Miles Avenue 20 Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Seeley Drive 20 Parking (Resort) 1/unit Parking (Casitas) 1.6/unit AOL Parking (Restaurant) 1/115 sq ft Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 7 554 11 11 The Centre Pointe Protect Specific Plan * Resort Casitas • within the first 60' along Miles Avenue, measured from the south side of the 20' landscape setback parcel, the Maximum height of the Resort Casitas units is 22'; • within the next 60' to 150' along Miles Avenue, the Maximum height of the Resort Casitas units is 26'; the height may be 33' outside the 150' setback. Use Area II The rmitted land uses and development standards for the 9.45 acre Land Use Area II area design ed as Medium Density Residential (RM) on the Land Use Plan. A. Purpose. o provide for the development and preservation of medium density neighborhoods consisting of to 60 single-family detached dwellings on medium and small size lots and/or developments clustered smaller dwellings, such as single-family attached townhome or multifamily dwellin with open space. B. Permitted Uses: The Ilowing uses are permitted in the RM Zoning District of this Specific Plan. 1. Attached dwelling u ' s 2. Detached dwelling un 3. Casitas when attached t main dwelling with or without kitchens 4. Zero lot line units (subject the approval of a conditional use permit) Medium Density Residential (RM) Develtpment Standards Area Requirements: Maximum site (acres) 9 Maximum number of units 60 Single Family Detached Units Lot Sizes Minimum lot size 4,5 Minimum lot frontage 45 ft Building Heights Adjacent to existing residential 20 ft Not adjacent to existing residential 28 ft Maximum stories adjacent to existing residential 1 Maximum stories not adjacent to existing residential 2 Set backs: Front yard setback w/side loaded garage 15 ft Front yard setback w/front loaded garage 20 ft Site yard setback 5 ft Rear yard setback 20 ft in Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 8 t 551) The Centre Pointe Plan aximum lot coverage 60% imum livable floor area for single-family detached excluding garages 1200 sq ft Parki 2/unit within a garage *The are south of Seeley Drive shall contain no less than 40 units available to moderate income in iduals and/or families. Of these 40 units, the minimum house size for 30% of the units can be o less than 1,200 square feet. The remaining 70% of the units must have a minimum dwe ' g size of 1,400 square feet. Two -Story Cou rd Single Family Homes Minimum lot size 2,975 sq ft Minimum lot frontage 35 ft Minimum front yard setb k 20 ft Maximum structure height 28 ft Maximum number of stories 2 Minimum perimeter building/la scape setback (in ft) from Seeley Drive 20 ft Minimum livable floor area 1000 sq ft Minimum common area 30% Parking 2/unit 1 space per unit covered Interior street building/landscaping set ck 20 ft One and Two -Story Single Cluster Cou and Villas Lot sizes Minimum lot size 2,200 sq ft Minimum lot frontage 40 ft Building Heights Adjacent to existing residential 20 ft Not adjacent to existing residential 28 ft Maximum stories adjacent to existing residential 1 Maximum stories not adjacent to existing residenti Building Setbacks Front Yard Facing common area 15 Facing public or private street 20 ft Side Yard 5 ft Rear Yard loft Distance between buildings along common driveways 30 ft Interior street building/landscape setback 20 It Setback from Seeley Drive 20 ft Minimum livable floor area 1,200 sq ft Minimum common open area 30% Parking 2/unit** Streets shall be 32' measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line with no parking on a side of street **Up to 20% of the units may have a single car garage and 1 uncovered parking space. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 gf F 556 The Centre Pointe Proiect Specific Plan 11 Land Use Area II The permitted land uses and development standards for the 9.45 acre Land Use Area II area designated as Medium High Density Residential (RMH) on the Land Use Plan. A. Purpose: To provide for the development and preservation of medium high density neighborhoods (eight to twelve units per acre) with one and two-story single-family detached dwellings on small lots, one and two-story single-family attached dwellings, and one, two and three-story townhome and multifamily dwellings. Note: Average Persons per Household = 2 52: for Senior and Congregate and Care uses 2.52 persons= 1 Dwelling Unit B. Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the RMH Zoning District of this Specific Plan. 1. Single family detached dwellings 2. Single family detached patio homes 3. Duplexes (two units on the same lot) 4. Single family attached dwellings (two units per building with each unit on its own lot) 5. Townhome dwellings (two or more units per building with each unit on its own lot) 6. Congregate living facilities 7. Congregate care facility 8. Residential care facilities 9. Senior citizen residences, subject to section 9.60.200 10.Senior group housing, subject to section 9.60.200 RMH Medium High Density Development Standards Minimum lot size for single-family detached or attached Minimum project size for multifamily projects Minimum lot frontage for single-family detached /attached Minimum frontage for multifamily projects Maximum structure height Maximum height of Architectural features Maximum number of stories Minimum front yard setback (non garage portion of dwelling) Minimum garage setback for single-family detached or attached Minimum interior/exterior side yard setbacks for single family detached and multifamily buildings Minimum sideyard setbacks for single-family attached Minimum rear yard setback Maximum lot coverage Minimum livable floor area for single-family detached excluding garage Minimum livable floor area for multifamily units excluding garage Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 3600 sq ft 20,000 sq ft 40ft 100 ft 40 ft 42 ft 3 min 145 ft of east property line 20 ft* 25 ft** 5/10 ft*** 0' on attached side, 10' on open side 15ft 68% 1200 sq ft 750 sq ft Page 10 557 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Minimum livable floor area for Congregate Living Facility Units (Suites) 250 sq ft Minimum landscape setbacks adjacent to perimeter streets**** 10' minimum at any point, 20' minimum average over entire frontage Minimum common open area**** 30% *Projects with five or more adjacent dwelling units facing the same street shall incorporate front setbacks varying between 20 feet and 25 feet or more in order to avoid streetscape monotony. **Twenty feet if "roll up" type garage door is used. ***For interior setbacks, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is five feet plus one foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of ten feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17-foot building. ****Does not apply to single-family detached if a specific plan is required. Landscaping and open area shall be per the standards of Section 9.60.240. Deviations Proposed Existing LQMC Zoning Designations RMH RM RMH Height 40 28 28 Architectural Projections 42 NA NA Stories 3 min 145 ft 2 2 of east property line Minimum Living Area Congregate Uses 250sgft NA NA Minimum Living Area Single Family Attached 1100sgft 1200sgft 1400sgft Building Lot Coverage 70% 60% 60% Distance to parking 100 ft+ NA 100 ft Duplex Parking 1 garage space 2 garage spaces 2 garage spaces + 1 guest space + 1 guest space + 1 guest space General Parking 134 total spaces N/A 204 total spaces (40 covered) (102 covered) Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 11 556 E The Centre Pointe Protect Specific Plan Land Use Area III The permitted land uses and development standards for the 2.70 acre Land Use Area III area designated as Parks and Recreation (PR) on the Land Use Plan. A. Purpose: To provide for the development open space and recreational opportunities. B. Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the PR Zoning District with approval of this Specific Plan. 1. Open Space 2. Public parks and passive recreation facilities 3. Playfields, unlighted 4. Restrooms 5. Parking lots 6. Entry Monument Land Use Area IV The permitted land uses and development standards for the 13.5 acre Land Use Area IV area designated as Office (0) on the Land Use Plan. A. Purpose: To provide for the development medical office and surgical center. w B. Permitted Uses: The following uses are permitted in the 0 Zoning District with approval of this Specific Plan. 1. Medical Off ices 2. Surgery and Recuperative Center 3. Ancillary related commercial uses such as medical supply, and pharmacy C: Prohibited Uses: 1. Helicopter Landing Areas 2. Emergency Center Office Development Standards Minimum building site (acres) 9 Building Height Zones First 250 feet from the east property line is limited to structure heights of 33 ft Maximum building height within the remainder of the office area (to Seeley Drive) 45 ft First 150 feet along Washington Street is limited to structure heights of 22 ft Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 12 55 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Setbacks Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from Washington Street 20 ft Minimum perimeter building/landscape setback (in ft.) from residential districts 50/15 ft Maximum number of stories 3 Parking 1/250 sq ft Site Concept The Site Concept is presented in Exhibit B of this document. As the gateway to the City of La Quinta, the architectural and landscape design of the site will be developed to enhance the qualities of the City. The intersection of Miles and Washington, due to its prominent location, will be enhanced with landscaping and monumentation to create a sense of arrival to the site. Landscaping along the streets will respond to the existing boulevard character. A landscape buffer will be designed to mitigate traffic noise and will be oriented to preserve views of distant mountains. Sloping berms at a maximum height of 4' from curb height will be planted in layers to restrict the views of parking areas from surrounding streets. Seeley Drive will have a landscaped median and parkways throughout the project. The broad, pedestrian -scaled character of the street will run through the site. In the residential area, sidewalks behind parkway planting will provide access to the neighborhood park. The pedestrian -accessible park will serve as green space for the residents. Architectural Character The buildings constructed on the site should maintain a consistent theme carried out by quality materials and imaginative design consistent with the existing character of La Quinta. Building design shall be unique to the site in that the configuration should take advantage of and preserve surrounding vistas. Additional reference material is provided in Exhibit C of this document. Other salient characteristics of the architectural character are: • The use of simple plaster masses with deep punched openings, arched entryways, and shading elements. • Horizontal and vertical building offsets to create articulated breaks and visual relief. • Wood detailing, tile work and vivid colors at key places along broad plaster masses. • Building integration with indigenous landscaping, such that the architecture appears as an extension and outgrowth of the landscape. • Strategic orientation and configuration of buildings and shading elements to passively heat and cool spaces. • False roofs are prohibited. Flat roofs may be used in combination with other roof forms. The simple yet strong architectural vocabulary for the development should rely on strategically placed key details and the careful selection of landscape materials. The details employed include arcades, balconies deeply recessed openings, low walls, wood detailing and awnings. Resort Uses Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 13 560 C~' The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan The following architectural elements should be incorporated in order to increase building articulation and reduce the scale of the three-story hotels: • Elements such as awnings, balconies roof overhangs, or trellises that protrude from building elevations. o Varying roof plate heights that create a layered or staggered roofline. o Elements such as arcades or balconies that "step" in plan and elevation, creating shadow and depth. • Entries should be articulated with larger openings in the facade, richer building materials and colors, and arcades or portals. • Entry plazas and courtyards should include shading elements such as trellises and landscaping. Congregate Care & Residential Uses The design of the residential component shall incorporate elements that respond to the climate of La Quinta. Such design features include patios, balconies, courtyards, arcades, plazas and paseos. Extended roof overhangs shall be incorporated into building design to provide additional shade. Overall design of the residential component shall incorporate the following guidelines: • Architectural design shall be unique in character, but consistent with surrounding area. • Orientation of structures should consider the climate of the area. • Housing edges should maximize view potential and access to natural open areas. • Porches and balconies should be designed to promote social interaction among community residents and should be an integral component of the buildings architectural style. • Mechanical elements of the building shall be screened from view by walls, fences or landscaping. • Varying house configurations is encouraged to promote variety in the street scene. • Encourage the use of curvilinear streets. Landscape Overall development identity and character is defined and enhanced by the continuity of landscape materials along publicly visible areas. Individual parcel identity can be established through variations in landscaping at major entry points, along smaller streets within the development, and within individual parcel open space areas. The HOA shall maintain all common area landscaping in perpetuity. Exhibits D 1-5 provide general guidance for the development of a final landscape plan for the development. Landscape Concept The landscape architectural theme for the development is to create an identifiable "signature" landscape character for the development. Landscaping is subject to the City of La Quinta water efficient landscape ordinance. Additional guidelines within this document are intended to achieve the following goals: • Create a signature landscape theme defining the character of La Quinta Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 14 .„, 561 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta • Enhance major views by landscape treatment • Utilize drought tolerant landscape • Create hierarchy of theme signage from monumental entrance to individual parcel identity • Create focal points • Utilize tree massing to screen the rear and sides of outdoor service uses (i.e. trash enclosures, etc) • Strategic clusters of dense landscaping to serve as wind barriers The landscape concept shall consist of three zones to maximize water efficiency as well as to keep maintenance at a minimum. The three zones are as follows: • Water Efficient 'Drip Zone'- These areas will receive the least amount of use (e.g., median islands, parking islands, etc.). Plantings in this zone will consist of drought tolerant low shrubs, maximum use ground covers and desert trees. Crushed 'fines' rock and large boulders can be used in addition to ground covers. The irrigation system will be drip. (See Exhibit D-1) • Transitional Landscape Zone - These areas will bridge the gap between zone 1 and zone 3 and generally be seen along the street frontages. Medium shrubs, canopy trees and a limited amount of turf will be used. Turf areas should be irrigated with short flat spray heads that have short radii to reduce the amount of over spray and resulting damage to adjacent hardscape. (See Exhibit D-1 ) • Building Entry Zone - These areas will be located at building entries, courtyards or other recreational facilities that will receive maximum use. Ground covers, shrubs and trees with more abundant foliage will be used to create a cooler, quieter environment for the users of these spaces. (See Exhibit D-1) Streetscape Concept The streetscape concept is the primary landscape influence for the development and is intended to unify the development. The streetscape components consist of meandering sidewalks, identifying street tree patterns, and a bermed edge accented with shrubs, ground covers and rock. Turf areas will be located at intersections where ample space is provided. Shrubs will be used as a screen where necessary. Root barriers for trees shall be used for any tree that is located closer than 6' from adjacent hardscape. Washington Street and Miles Avenue Tree Design The dominant tree along Miles Avenue shall be Prosopis Alba (Thornless Mesquite) planted in informal clusters to follow the meandering walk approximately 50 ft. intervals. The trees should be accented by clusters of Washingtonia filifera (California Fan Palm). Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palm) should be incorporated at significant development entry drives. Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) can be used outside right-of-ways to accentuate buildings or other site enhancements. Landscape lighting may occur at specimen plants or to accent clusters. Seeley Drive Tree Design Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 15 2 56 The Centre Pointe Proiect Specific Plan Seeley Drive should be planted with Tipuana Tipu (Tipu Tree) to lineate the road. Washingtonia filifera (California Fan Palm) shall be used to accent major parcel entries. Significant specimen plants will be accented with uplighting. To supplement this pattern, other species of trees can be used on site. Please refer to the plant palette (See Exhibit E) Development Entries at Washington Street and Miles Avenue Development entries at Washington Street and Miles Avenue shall continue the Phoenix dactylfera (Date Palm) theme from the development entries as mentioned above. Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palm) shall be spaced formally at 25' intervals along the center median. Along either side of the street, Phoenix dactylfera (Date Palm) will occur at 25' intervals and be placed to follow the contour of the meandering sidewalk. (See Exhibit D-2, 3). Parking Areas Parking area landscaping shall be designed to accomplish the following: • Provide shading • Serve as a visual barrier from Miles Avenue, Washington Street and Seeley Drive. Landscaped islands shall be provided at the ends of stall rows to break up parking areas by creating a series of smaller parking pockets. Parking pockets shall be distributed at a minimum of one per 10 parking stalls and should provide a minimum of 10' landscaped width to allow planting and mounding. The landscaped islands shall be a minimum of 9' wide providing a minimum of 6' wide landscape space. Islands shall contain large canopy trees to provide shade. Parking lots shall have 24" box trees (2"-3" Caliper) whose placement shall be such that the mature tree spread will shade fifty percent (50%) of the parking stall area with tree canopies within 15 years. Along Miles Avenue and Washington Street, parking must be screened with a block wall and/or berm (3:1 slope maximum, height of 4' from curb height) with adequate landscaping planted between the property line and the paved parking areas. Shrubs should partially screen cars and aisles, transforming vast parking lots into a series of smaller alcoves. (See Exhibit D-5). Minimum Landscaping Guidelines These development regulations are meant to meet the City of La Quinta water efficient landscape ordinance and to define an appropriate plant palette that will reinforce the unique identity of the development, yet provide flexibility and diversity in planting design. • A limited selection of plant materials used in simple, significant compositions is encouraged. Planting design should be compatible with and compliment adjacent plantings, reinforcing and enhancing the individual architecture and design of the site. • The materials on the Plant Palette (See Exhibit E) have been selected for their contribution to the development theme, their adaptability to climatic and soil conditions and with respect for long term cost effective maintenance. • Detailed landscape and irrigation plans are to be prepared by a landscape architect licensed in the State of California for each individual component of the development. The landscape plans are to be submitted to the City for review. All landscape areas are to be served by a permanent automatic underground irrigation system. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page'16 5 6 3 0 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Art in Public Places Fees generated for the development of this site shall be utilized to provide public art in Land Use Area I and IV. In lieu fees will not serve as a substitute for public art except in Land Use Area II. Sustainability Guidelines In response to the recent California energy crisis the City is taking a proactive role in development by ensuring that energy efficiency standards will be incorporated into this Specific Plan. An energy efficiency plan shall be submitted to the City for approval and shall include the following aspects: orientation, shading, solar paneling and energy efficient products. Circulation The circulation system for the Specific Plan conforms to the requirements of the City of La Quinta General Plan - Circulation element by providing a hierarchy of vehicular traffic -ways with pedestrian -ways segregated within the plan area. A detailed discussion of the technical issues of traffic impact analysis is presented in a site specific report prepared by Urban Crossroads. The traffic impact analysis shall be revised with future Site Development applications to reflect the changes in Land Use Areas as proposed by this Specific Plan Amendment No. 2. The following guidelines shall be implemented to provide a hierarchy of travel options to residents and guests within the development: Construct internal roadways that provide a safe route for development ingress and egress to both commercial and residential areas. • Construct bike paths connecting with the system of bike paths outside the development area consistent with the architectural theme and landscape character. • Construct pedestrian meandering walkways connecting commercial, residential areas with surrounding sidewalks. Walkways shall blend with the surrounding landscape character and provide interconnectivity within the development. Off -site Improvements • The development shall contribute towards a citywide roadway and traffic signal improvement program as a result of infrastructure development fees for the City of La Quinta. These fees shall be paid at the building permit stage of development. • The Public Works Department shall consider the option to install a left turn pocket for southbound Seeley Drive, north of Miles Avenue. On -site Improvements • Construct Seeley Drive from Washington Street to Miles Avenue at its ultimate width as a local street in conjunction with development. • Sight distance at the development entrance should be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans/City of La Quinta sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page,17 6 4 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan • Traffic signaling/striping at Miles Avenue and Seeley Drive should be implemented when warranted in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the development site and shall be financed 100% by resort developer. Wind & Erosion Control The Coachella Valley experiences periods of moderate to high wind conditions. Therefore, windblown dust and sand are a concern during local grading operations. The South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Environmental Protection Agency have instituted a plan in the Coachella Valley to reduce excess PM 10 (small particle dust). These provisions must be adhered to during grading operations. SWPPP/NPDES /PM10 The provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) apply to construction projects over 5 acres in size. The development will require a Notice of Intent (NOI) and NPDES permit containing a Best Management Practices Plan to be filed/prepared. Furthermore, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must also be prepared for the development and submitted to the City of La Quinta. Drainage and Flood Control The drainage plan proposes to collect and convey storm flows via a piped storm drain system to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. This system would be installed in phases starting with the northerly portion of the site (hotel and casitas) including facilities contained within Seeley Drive. If the plans for the remainder of the property (medical office building, residential and boutique hotel) are advanced to the point of knowing where the storm drain(s) would be located, then the entire system may be installed with phase one. If the detailed plans are still undergoing refinement, then one or more temporary retention' basins may be installed to collect the stormwater until those phases are constructed. A feature of the grading and drainage design will be an overflow channel in the event that the storm drains become inoperative. A requirement with the storm drain system will be an intercept to collect nuisance water such as a dry well or sand filter system. With the drywells or alternative intercepts sized appropriately, this type of system eliminates nuisance flow discharges to the channel, provides an emergency overflow through the channel wall and' eliminates surface runoff over the channel wall. Due to the phasing of the development, reciprocal drainage agreements may be necessary. Utilities The infrastructure that will serve the development is described below and is designed to provide a coordinated system of infrastructure and public services to adequately serve the plan area at full build out. The infrastructure and utilities plan identifies standards relative to land use for the plan area and establishes the infrastructure and public service policies. Sewer Plan The development is located within the jurisdiction of the Coachella Valley Water District (CWVD) for sewer service. As shown in Exhibit G, an existing 18-inch sewer main is located along the CVWD channel access road, to the south of the development. Preliminary discussions with Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page ,18 5 65 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta CVWD have indicated that two connections to this existing District facility are appropriate. One sewer service will connect to an existing manhole near the southwest comer of the development (near the intersection of Washington Street and the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel) and extend northward along Washington Street to future Seeley Drive. This line will extend up Seeley and provide service for the proposed restaurant, commercial, hotel, and townhouse developments. The second sewer service will connect to an existing manhole near the southeast corner of the development. This service will extend on site and be used for future single-family residential development. ' Water Plan The development is located within the jurisdiction of the Coachella Valley Water District for water service. As shown in Exhibit H, existing 18-inch water stubs are located at both ends of future Seeley Drive. Preliminary discussions with CWVD have indicated that the developer would be required to complete this 18-inch loop. On -site domestic, irrigation, and fire flow water would be provided from the proposed 18-inch pipe. Electrical Plan Electric service is provided to the site by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). A preliminary discussion with IID has indicated that electrical facilities are located on the south side of Miles Avenue and the east side of Washington Street. Further discussion with IID will be necessary to identify the exact location of these facilities. Service to the development is assumed to be outline. Other Utilities Natural Gas - Natural gas service is provided to the site by the Southern California Gas Company. Based on "as -built' plans, an existing gas main has been identified in Washington Street, adjacent to the site. Further discussion with the Gas Company and a field investigation are recommended to determine the exact location of the pipe. Service to the development is assumed to be routine. However, some cutting and removal/reconstruction of pavement and curb will be required. Telephone - Telephone service will be provided to the development by Verizon. Based on "as - built" plans, existing telephone facilities have been with Verizon will be necessary to accurately locate these facilities and determine the preferred connection points. Service to the development is assumed to be routine. It is likely that some cutting and removal/reconstruction of pavement and curb will be required. Cable Television - Cable Television service will be provided to the site by Time Warner. Based on correspondence with the cable company, empty conduits exist along the south side of Miles Avenue and the east side of Washington Street. The exact location of these conduits is not known. Further discussion with the cable company will be necessary to determine if extension of existing cable lines to serve the development is feasible. Phasing The following diagram illustrates the phasing schedule for the proposed development. A detailed description of each phase can be found in the Fourth Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA). Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 19 " 566 11 11 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Specific Plan Minor Modifications to Land Use Area II The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan and not requiring a Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall have the discretion to refer any suck request for modification to the Planning Commission. • Change in utility and / or public service provider. • A maximum increase of twenty five percent (25%) to the total number of units or twenty five percent (25%) of the density. • Minor changes to landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment, entry design, and streetscape design, which are consistent with the conceptual design, set forth in the design guidelines, contained within the Specific Plan. • Minor changes to the design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature only, and are intended to be flexible in implementation. • Other modifications of a similar nature to those listed above, which are deemed minor by the Community Development Director, which are in keeping with the purpose and intent of the approved Specific Plan Amendment and which are in conformance with the General Plan. Prior to the Planning Director making a written determination as to the substantial conformance of a revised plan in accordance with the standards set forth in the approved Specific Plan Amendment, the applicant shall prepare a written request that addresses the nature of the revisions and how the revised plan complies with the adopted Specific Plan Amendment Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 20 56i The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta standards. The applicant's request shall be accompanied by appropriate graphic and / or technical information that supports the revision(s). Specific Plan Amendments Amendments to Specific Plan Amendments may be requested by the applicant at any time pursuant to Section 65453(a) of the Government Code. Amendments shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the proposed amendment requires supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant(s) are responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA documentation. Modifications to Approved Grading Final grading may vary from the project's approved tentative map. Land Use Element General Plan Land Use Goal 2; Policy 2 and Program 2.2, Policy 4: "The site is greater than 10 acres in size and is located within a land use designation (Tourist Commercial) that requires the preparation of a Specific Plan." Residential Land Use Goal 2; Policy 1, Policy 2, Policy 5 and Program 5.1, Policy 6: The proposed development will add to the broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of this City and feature a senior housing component consisting of congregate care, assisted living, memory care and cottages. The density for the development shall be 12 DU/AC. The specific plan contains development standards including setbacks, and architectural design characteristics. The plan includes attached and detached product offering more opportunity for affordability." Commercial Land Use Goal 1 and 2; Policy 2: "The Tourist Commercial (TC) and Office (0) categories shall provide for a narrow range of specialized uses oriented to tourist and resort activity. The TC category includes destination resort hotels, small boutique hotel units, eating and drinking establishments, accessory retail. The development of hotels and related tourist -oriented uses is highly desirable to provide a future revenue base for the City. The Specific Plan provides standards to guide tourist -oriented development." Other Land Use Goals Goal 1, Goal 2, Policy 4: "The Park (P) category of this Specific Plan shall provide for the designation of an improved public park and recreational facilities in the City. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 21 568 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Circulation Element Traffic and Circulation Policy 2 and Program 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.10, Policy 6, Policy 13.1, 13.2, Policy 14 and Policy 15: "The proposed development has defined improvements which specifically minimize the disruption of established neighborhoods, schools and commercial centers by the creation of Seeley Drive with internal access points for the development at a minimum spacing of 250 between access points, minimal access points on Washington Street and Miles Avenue. Washington Street is classified as a major Arterial and Miles Avenue is classified as a Primary Arterial. The development will not lower established levels of service along either arterial. The Specific Plan identifies design standards for the development and enhancement of streets. The Specific Plan further requires City approval on all future street design. The completed street sections will contain provisions for bicycles and pedestrians to reduce dependence on vehicles for transportation. Open Space Element Open Space Policy 1 and Policy 7: Although the site does not have direct access to hillside areas or other identified areas of preservation there has been the provision of onsite amenities associated with the resort components, the plan also sets aside 2.70 acres of public park space. The Specific Plan recognizes the importance of views and prescribes guidelines to preserve them. Parks and Recreation Element Parks and Recreation Goal 2, Policy 1, Program 1. I, Program 1.3, Program 4.4, Policy 6, In addition to the onsite amenities associated with the resort components, the plan has set aside 2.70 acres of public park space within this project. Guidelines have been outlined in the Specific Plan for the reduction of waste and water efficiency through irrigation methods and select plant species. Natural Resources Element Air Quality Goal 1, Policy 1, Program 2.1, Policy 3, Policy 4: The development is located adjacent to similar uses and is not subject to objectionable odors or emissions. Landscaped setbacks have been incorporated into the plan to separate the uses from adjacent roads and associated impacts. The plan proposes a mixture of uses that could assist in reduced commutes. The plan provides easy access to major roadways thereby reducing vehicle miles traveled to reach major transportation routes. Energy and Mineral Resources Goal 2, Program 1.2, Program 2.1, Program 3.2: The Plan encourages that the buildings contain the up to date energy efficient appliances and solar control to reduce impacts on non-renewable resources. The Specific Plan also encourages the use of active solar, passive solar and other energy conservation opportunities wherever feasible. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 22 56 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Biological Resources Program 1.2, Policy 2, Program 2.2, Program 2.4, Policy 3: The site is located in an area of high sensitivity to various species including the Palm Springs, Pocket Mouse, the Palm Springs Ground Squirrel and others. At the appropriate time, biological surveys will be conducted to determine if any protected species are present. Recommended mitigation will be followed. The site will also participate in the payment of fees for the protection of the Coachella valley fringe -toed lizard. The Specific Plan encourages the use of native and drought tolerant plant materials particularly in the public areas. Paleontological Resources The site is not located in an area of high paleonotolgical sensitivity. Water Resources Policy 1, Program 1.1, Program 1.2, Program 1.3 and Program 2.2: The Specific Plan encourages incorporation of the comments from the Coachella Valley water District regarding water usage and conservation methods. The site contains a well site that is dedicated for the purposes of new domestic supply. The sire will contain on site retention areas that will assist in the recharging of the groundwater supply and flood control. Infrastructure and Public Services Element Infrastructure and Public Services Program 1.1 and Program 4.2: The Specific Plan requires compliance with the regulations of the Uniform Fire Code and encourages safe areas, well lighted parking areas and other security measures promoted by enforcement agencies. Educational Facilities Program 1.1 and Policy 3: The land uses included n the Specific Plan are subject to the payment of an impact fees to offset impacts to the school system. Surface Water and Storm Drainage Policy 2, Policy 3 and Policy 4: The Specific Plan provides for retention basins to be incorporated into the grading and drainage plans of the individual site developments. These retention basins shall be encouraged and to the extent feasible be sited in areas which facilitate recharge of the groundwater aquifer. Adequate on and off -site storm water collection and detention/retention facilities that will contain and convey storm water to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel will be reviewed by the City. Solid Waste Management Policy 1 and Program 1.1: The Specific Plan encourages the wise use of resources and that includes provisions for recycling and use of solid waste management services. Domestic Water Policy 1 and Program 1.1: The project area is adequately served with domestic water and sanitary sewer services by the Coachella Valley Water District. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 23 570 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Public Utilities Policy 2, Program 2.1, Program 2.2, Policy 3, Policy 4, Program 4.1 and Program 4.2: The Specific Plan proposes to that all utilities will be undergrounded. In addition communication facilities that will serve the project will be placed underground. Environmental Hazards Element Hazardous Materials Program 3.1, Program 4.1 and Policy 5: The uses proposed in the Specific Plan will comply with local regulations regarding the transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous materials. The development will also be connected to sanitary sewer system of the Coachella Valley Water District. Geologic and Seismic Hazards Policy 3, Program 3.1, Policy 5, Program 5.1 and Policy 9: The Specific Plan shall require that all structures and foundations be designed and constructed to resist seismic forces in accordance with the criteria of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Although the site is not located in an identified area of unstable soils the development shall comply with City regulations regarding soil compaction tests. The site is located in an area identified as a wind hazards area. Care shall be taken in the placement of buildings and public areas to minimize the wind associated impacts. Flooding and Hydrology Policy 5, Program 5.1 and Policy 6: The site is not located within a flood hazard area but it adjacent to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Partial lining of the channel will protect the embankments and slope areas adjacent to the site. The development will contain its incremental increase in storm runoff on site and only emergency flows will be discharged into the Channel. On site facilities will be designed to address nuisance water. Noise Policy 2 and Policy 3: The Specific Plan has provided setbacks from the major roadways and encourages care when placing structures to that the maximum amount of noise insulation is proved to sensitive receptors. The residential uses are located to the most distant point form the noise sources. Cultural Resources Element Historic Preservation The site is vacant and contains no visible historical resources. Care should be taken during grading and excavation. If resources are encountered, activities should be diverted to other areas until the significance of the resource can be determined. Housing Element Policy 1 .I .8: A housing analysis shall be submitted as part final the final development plan. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 24 5 71 g The Centre Pointe Proiect Specific Plan E city Flooding and Hydrology Goal, Policies and Programs Goal: The protection of the general health, safety and welfare of the community from flooding and associated hydrological hazards. Building design and a reduced demand for vehicle parking reduces the demand for impervious surfaces on our site. This promotes less stormwater runoff and lessens the impact on surrounding stormwater infrastructure. Policy 5: Drainage policies and development standards shall provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and shall be consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. Reduced impervious surface compared with other possible uses along with well engineered on site stormwater detention provides controlled low impact stormwater runoff. That meets or exceeds stormwater management standards. Noise Goal, Policies and Programs Goal: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character, and the mix of land uses provided in the City. The proposed use of a Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facility provides comparatively low noise impact to the surrounding environment. Less traffic as well as lower volume and fewer noise producing elements and equipment promotes a healthy low impact noise environment. General Land Use Goals, Policies, and Programs Goal 2: High quality development which promotes the City's image as the as "The Gem of the Desert" Neighborhood and community compatibility is achieved through careful planning and building design. The wing ends and building center step down from three to two and one story. This arrangement provides for privacy and a gentle change of scale creating a 'residential feel' to the site. Care is taken to maximize the appeal of the building and the site amenities while minimizing the impact to the surrounding community. Program 4.1: The City shall maintain detailed requirements for the preparation of the Specific Plans in its Development Code. The specific plan for this site is being amended to accommodate the development of the proposed Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facility. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 25 5 7 `? The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Policy 5: All land use development proposals shall be consistent with all applicable land use policies and standards contained in the General Plan. The overall intent and design for both the Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facilities will conform to all applicable policies and standards under the La Quinta General Plan. Policy 10: The City shall maintain its "dark sky" ordinance All exterior lighting is for this site is designed to remain on site and adhere to the "Dark Sky's" ordinance while providing a well lit, safe and secure environment for our residents. Residential Goals, Policies, and Programs Goal 1: The maintenance and protection of residential neighborhoods to assure that future housing needs are met Site and building design enables these facilities to blend in to with the surrounding environment while providing two very vital areas within the senior housing segment of the La Quinta community. Goal 2: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City Providing an Independent living Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facilities assists in broadening the senior housing segment for La Quinta. Additionally these facilities provide a practical option for La Quinta seniors that allow them to remain within their local community. Policy 1: The City shall encourage the preservation of neighborhood character and assure a consistent and compatible residential land use pattern. The proposed uses for this site provide both compatibility and a positive transition between the residential uses to the east with the more intense medical use to the west. The residential nature of the design and gradual change in building heights further facilitates this compatibility. Program 1.1: The City shall periodically review land use designation definitions to assure that changes in the community and marketplace are met. These proposed facilities are a vital component in meeting the growing demand for senior housing options in the La Quinta community. Program 1.2: Apply the City's discretionary powers and site development review process consistently to assure that subdivision and development plans are compatible with existing residential areas. The intent of this development is to achieve Neighborhood compatibility through careful planning and building design. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 26 S The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Policy 2: Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. The proposed uses for this site provide both compatibility and a positive transition and buffer that protects the existing the residential uses to the east with the more intense medical use to the west. The residential nature of the design and gradual change in building heights further facilitates compatibility and buffering. Commercial Goals, Policies and Programs Goal 1: A balanced and varied economic base which provides a broad range of goods and services to the City's residents and the region. The proposed development of the Retirement Residence and Assisted Living Facilities meets senior housing needs while providing a stable, balanced employment base for staffing the facilities needed services. The services provided create employment on site as well as demand for goods and support services from the local community. Water Resources Goal, Policies and Programs Goal: The careful management and conservation of the City's water resources. The congregate nature of these facilities along with the energy and resource efficient design allows for lower utility usage in comparison with other residential uses of similar density. Program 1.2: The Building Department shall ensure that all plumbing fixtures in new development and remodeling projects conform to applicable California statutes and codes especially dealing with water saving fixtures. All fixtures and appliances will meet or exceed existing energy saving standards. Policy 2: The City shall continue to promote groundwater recharge efforts. Site design intentionally maximizes pervious surface and groundwater retention and supports groundwater recharge, reducing outflow to the surrounding properties and infrastructure. Education Facilities Goal: Educational facilities and services that are adequate and convenient to all City residents and enhance the quality of life within the community The age specific nature of these segments of the senior housing market assures no direct impact on local educational faculties. Although a positive byproduct often results in a new volunteer base for the neighboring schools for reading, tutoring and adopt a grandparent programs. I - Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 27 57' The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta e Surface Water & Storm Drainage Goal Goal: Adequate defense against the potential hazards associated with stormwater and surface water flooding. Site design intentionally maximizes pervious surface and groundwater retention and reducing outflow to the surrounding properties and infrastructure Policy 3: All new development shall include on -site retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater management facilities to accommodate runoff from the 100-year storm. Site design intentionally maximizes pervious surface and on site groundwater retention therefore reducing outflow to the surrounding properties and infrastructure. Site stormwater design will meet or exceed the 100-year storm standard. Domestic Water Goal Goal: Domestic water facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. The congregate nature of these facilities with common kitchen and laundry along with the energy and resource efficient design allows for reduced domestic water consumption comparison with other residential uses of similar density. Policy 1: The City shall assure that adequate, high quality potable water supplies and facilities are provided to all development in the community As stated above the proposed uses create a lower demand on domestic water resources and infrastructure. I Sanitary Sewer Goal: Sanitary sewer facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. The congregate nature of these facilities along with the energy and resource efficient design allows for lower utility usage in comparison with other residential uses of similar density lowering the demand on sanitary sewer infrastructure. Air Quality Goals, Policies and Programs Goal 1: Land use and development patterns which contribute to the improvement of local and regional air quality. Both facilities provide reduced traffic impact and minimal air quality impact. The private shuttle transportation provides an attractive alternate transportation option that is environmentally friendly. Residents of both facilities are provided this service at no additional cost to the resident. Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Pagg 2$ 5 75 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Citv of La Quinta Goal 2: A reduction in pollution emissions generated within the City. Fewer than 20% of our residents drive and with the private shuttle service the vehicle emissions for this site will be nominal. Policy 4: The City shall encourage growth around activity centers and arterial streets to provide more efficient travel patterns and transit service. The facilities location on Seeley Drive and close proximity to the Eisenhower Medical Center places it in an ideal location for efficient facility provided transportation as well as public transit. Energy and Mineral Resources Goal, Policies, and Programs Goal 1: The efficient use and management of valuable energy resources. The congregate nature of these facilities with common kitchen and laundry along with the energy and resource efficient design and the energy efficient appliances allows for reduced consumption of energy. Program 1.1: Planning and building standards which minimize the consumption of non-renewable energy resources shall be incorporated into City codes. Careful site design for both facilities along with intentional energy and resource saving design allows for lower utility usage and demand on resource sensitive utilities, resulting in lower demand on overall utility infrastructure. Program 1.2: Passive design concepts which increase energy efficiency, such as the use of landscaping materials and site orientation to provide shade and windbreaks, shall be encouraged. Site design is a critical component for both neighborhood compatibility as well as providing passive heating and cooling features for each facility. Each facility is oriented and the landscape is designed to gain the maximum benefit. Program 2.1: Establish building setbacks such that they do not compromise the solar access of adjacent properties. The facilities orientation and ample setback are designed to both respect and protect the solar access for the surrounding properties. 10 Amendment #3 July 30, 2012 Page 29 ;e 570 -Ezlubat ' ' Ll 577 11 Ili 578 The Centre Porte Project Specific Plan Exhibit ___ City of La Quinta I A - 'Exhibit ;: Exhibit B is for illustrative purposes and is subject to modification based upon the development standards in the Specific Plan and applicable Zoning Development Standards. E 579 I AmnCrGPF LANDSCAPE - BERM BUFFER TO PARKING Congregate Care Uses RESTAURANT * THE ABOVE SITE PLAN REPRESENTS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE 580 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit - �- City of La Ouinta--- --_ 131 Wi r7i % rr9l7FTPT",'L- I 531 E 11 0 r rf, Jam,. K(� MSA CONsm.TING, INC— Concept Plan - Medical and Surgical Center Mn¢�no. seurx s Assocuh3 troc—; n..mw . cnv. em�o • Lum avnevn 3621p Bro Ntle DarvaRAN000 Nva%.G 9's2T1 lBrasoxe (7W) )1A901 F. (]M) 321M CENTRE POINTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC AT LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 582 :Exhibit 53s 11 Ll ci lows! � l w ''I MSA Coxsm,m�ra 7xc Conce t Plan -Restaurants Resort, and Resort Casitas >s�.a,�a sflrn . naocnrav, we P , + �a.an,�a° `""mom ' CENTRE POINTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC 362W Bm time Am � QMLBJ Mn� � G 932A '�"� "0Ap � P'� �� R1�89i AT LA OUINTq, CALIFORNIq 584 'Exhibit ' «. 0_ 585 C J 0 Architectural Character Reference Images �urgc, or; hoJ tM:¢rnn�+ orncela�r entry. imU ud rtnm"v.:m. Et IYu-rBm,nK dm.d, Av=mc1 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan —--`--- City of La Cpuinta � e Exhibit C-1 C E Architectural Character Reference Images va.d. r:gc;,tm,1 owl re:@n=P:r,wr alJ sfiU9Ay. •.r Ranruvemblip <snd Iausis<up q; :heee lb"(1. pro: � plots 4wphis �esloce stole n[ huildinr� pn grcodvd pacsoRvav ❑nd 4n:isr Onq shade cou �tti at peal iun..f• N•lil'Jdo.o .h:dn,z 4rN NN.r..d 587 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Ouinta C-2 Ll 538 E MILES STREETSCAPE *WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE *MEANDERING SIDEWALK CITY ENTRY ELEMENT *PALM GROUPINGS, CANOPY *LUSH DESERT LANDSCAPE TREES FOR SHADE WITH ACCENT PLANTS WATER EFFI �^ �•"6a•C.�i .1 Y �lra iE TRIP ZONE' LLf RESORT CASITAS 'RESTAU —�_ INTERIOR STR"" *MEDIAN ISLAND *STREET TREES 9� RESORT `t• WATER EFFIC ��s, "DRIP ZONE° WASHINGTON STREETSCAPE *WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE *MEANDERING LANDSCAPE A� *PALM GROUPINGS, CANOPY TREES FOR SHADE i �1 PROJECT ENTRY ELEMENT *SPECIAL FEATURE *ENTRY MONUMENT *ACCENT PAVING *COLORFUL ACCENT PLANTS N.T.S- WATER EFFI °DRIP ZONE" MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING / CLINIC WELL SITE PROJECT ENTRY ELEMENT *SPECIAL FEATURE *ENTRY MONUMENT *ACCENT PAVING *FORMAL ARRANGEMENTS OF PALMS *COLORFUL ACCENT PLANTS f 1 RESORT \ / CASITAS L kPE G / f a0* Ox. /�� PARK /` TRANSIB ZONE Residential/ Congregate Care LANDSCAPE PERIMETER *MEDIUM HEIGHT TREES WITH TALL SHRUBS FOR SCREENING *LANDSCAPE NOT TO OBSTRUCT VIEWS OF SURROUNDING MOUNTAINS Congregate Care MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING / CLINIC The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Quinta D1 LANDSCAPE *MEANDERING LANDSCAPE A� *PALM GROUPINGS, CANOPY TREES FOR SHADE i �1 PROJECT ENTRY ELEMENT *SPECIAL FEATURE *ENTRY MONUMENT *ACCENT PAVING *COLORFUL ACCENT PLANTS N.T.S- WATER EFFI °DRIP ZONE" MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING / CLINIC WELL SITE PROJECT ENTRY ELEMENT *SPECIAL FEATURE *ENTRY MONUMENT *ACCENT PAVING *FORMAL ARRANGEMENTS OF PALMS *COLORFUL ACCENT PLANTS f 1 RESORT \ / CASITAS L kPE G / f a0* Ox. /�� PARK /` TRANSIB ZONE Residential/ Congregate Care LANDSCAPE PERIMETER *MEDIUM HEIGHT TREES WITH TALL SHRUBS FOR SCREENING *LANDSCAPE NOT TO OBSTRUCT VIEWS OF SURROUNDING MOUNTAINS Congregate Care MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING / CLINIC The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Quinta D1 E U k a/§ � 2 � � � � / _ ƒ � - : ' ¥ k � * . � 5g0 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Q |nta ID-2 u Lj @)p¥ dl® »a§L) DO $ . $6,..=0 $ �� u.... § I §Suu lei In %|} I � �« j ] m � 591 The Centre- Pointe Project Specific Plan EEE{ City of /a Quinla ID-3 11 EAMA 9PPICWW UHOICAPID X4p" YTN Dow IRI "rvN f mm aLOURgo TP 8CA/IM PANAM44 LOT ALTSI MAT(V& W WTCR ZP> =JdT LAMDSCd PL Mir NPN 4 i*00 **j0A17Ar If' VA" TO BCRCZN PA,RUWN ALIGMATIVE W PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONES The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta 592 Exhibit E 4 -f'ALM TREES WITH GFa0UND,C;0VER6 E LII Ll - "- - -- MET rL-AlN VI=Vv a vcwr w n I~tEZDIAN 15LAND LANDSCAPE PALM5 WITH 5ROUNDCOVERS d SEELEY DRIVE STREET SECTION PARKWAY LANDSCAPE U1IT14 TUB OR GROUNOCOVER$ CANOPY -STREET TREE 6. The Centre Pointe Project Specific PBan City of La Ouinta 595 Exhibit ®-5 ;-Exhibit `' 594 Roposed Rsaird Ph'efte im ame t.ortnttau ame low Pairm Are tfum rornrartaafl'aanura Cat Palm 10' - t B' height Rvervx dactyl ifera Date FbIni 20' RT.H. WashiVo3 a fil'ifera California Fan Palm 8' •20' ht. Washirrgtnnia rcbusta Itiutaacan iin Palm 8' ='16' ht. Chonveropshumiilis Mediterranean Fan Frahm 24" -48"box Trees _.. �..__._._ AcAcia salicina Wllow A[a(ja 24` box Citrus sp, Citrus 36' box Ran)Ous txlei 'Majestic amLAV tsrergreen Ash 36" box ,.tacaianda rninogfolia d3carada 36" box RaQapischilen is Chilean Mtesqui to 24" -36" box Fd1us llancea Afrimn Sumac 24" -48" ter S�hinus molle California Riper Tree 24" -48" bcx Sthinustovbinthifolrus aaalian%"Troa 2d"'J911bax Ulrnuspan#oila Rergreen em 2W • 36" box Fi puaeia Tipu Tipu Tnae 24" - 301. tDox Aorents '�' '—y 9ea��carn rewrvata tr ail Raim 15ga1. Cywsrevdute aVo PaIrr 24" lynx Das�irlcn longisdme Mexican GrassTree 5-gal, DaV, iricn vW*leri Desert Q)oon, gal. N1uh1enbergAa rigene Dear Grass 1-gal. BiVainAIlea "Do La La' gaiTmllea 5-gal. Caeealpima putcherrinna F bd Hrd of Paraci+se 5-gal. Carina g-'C3maaaod 8rauty Natal Rum 1-gal, Lassa arternesades Desert C,ms 5-gal. Cassia mernophita Bushy Sena 5-gaL Dodamm msoosa Hopseed Rish 5-g26. Enoele farinose Brittle Bush 1-ga . Furppspedinails Green tsefEveyops 5-0. Hibis usrom-dneNs ChiromHibimis 5-0. L+euoo"lum speoes Tema RmVer 5-. Nandim dornestica Heavenly Bamboo 5-0 Norium oleanda'1i3tite Dawf Oleander 5-gal. Fitta>sperum t, 'Variogata` Variegated Ritosporum 5 9aL 595 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Quirnta E u pErLmane RM M CAliandra inaecluilatera Tema capNisis "r• � • C; ac i- s'CwEenial' rnontewdens's jasmincides tsi� • ia• The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Ouinta 1 5'w- 15<ga1- 15ga1. 1-gal. Fiats 1-gal. @3r Q-C. 1-gal @4' 0.a 1 rgaL 3" =8" dia_ 2" depth 3' 5 596 Exhibit E . Ezhibii =` Ll 0 0 �ti1, z7 '1L 59i aAl 11r" R W fi ,r 1�I,TE a! x f'J'AH U SE-� r.E nUF h s, �« d f F<r-ED suecanDE- 8LA HINGTON STREET r-L` !r r;eu 1 n+c sa:wul- ULiihAAf [710t1) nlTc 2A $([ - J ,.ITTGk ( lilt, q,f WMI �. ('IjIfER n i✓��Lln'. N E �.o.. r�ppRSs ! FM TEE ,o©clxant- MILESAMENV15 I tf' V'. SICCV.MI'. fU{Tt}:AT[ SECT!Ohj r �m_� tITS. ti 20EANOSC,AK 1=' 27` _— ' _ - ��-'0 EAIIFJ-(4PE y 1 r �r N i / JCTId PF'}D LLf J ti E 1' ens rw zSEE Y-.DRIVE tFA e a�,zse LI MCAI+ F - + coN I ,u(rvI;H:.Di''• .1r /VA 1. D INC, S!OPoIALI ONNIVI M nrT!ot) - 9 'A 1DEFIMG' 11 Tsj SIOEIIAI I'. PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL DRIVE 'IdiPl!bl Jid SECIIv4! N,t > The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan Exhibit City of La Quinta F 598 Exhibit;,' 13 =1 0 7 1 � �, � 77 71 599 A TO MANHOLE SEWER PROPOSED ` SEWER q0 The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan City of La Quinta Exhibit , ' E Ll 6.)1 l C jG The Centre Pointe Project Specific Plan lExhibitl City of La Ouinta I H ;'T// iCr i \�\:. I,`. \`:\ ).. c 71 :, .:.i '\.\"+�, \\'`,a "�..` \ \. .�° \.L�:\: ,,...,_ L... ,I \_` v.� CD ''r1,TENTATI 4 _\\ \,I�\ \\l \\ \ I.�\\EX. 1 ,ASSESSORS PARE .\.\, >r, -\ - �\\\ \` \I�� •1 v ..\ �\\ p._J \` \ \� i\ \LEGAL DescRCTxTT- � ) 'I v.,\ T yet { y1 d \ I: �'�RGL�LC'� 0� CE71'fOza^\� ° �\�\G9 x ,z�� p\ d i�v�_��_ 1� __ ��41 _!_ " _ �_ _ _ ��rU f `I \ 0 ,., \ EnBTIxB BExERAI -�/�. zT'C' _- -R _L�.� \IXC9W;NDrt\_ _ �_�I�.-, :i :\\�\I _ _ __ .. .:-� -• N 1 1a W F 610 _ \ PROPOSED GENER ---- MISTING ZONINGF 16 • � � PFOP08ED ZpfN MISTING SPEasx _ � �9 • _ _ _ _ - I. I TOTAL GROSS AS TOTAL NET ACRE _ I I NUMBER OF _ t Pmz cA� oNC - °. _ - _ILD Y �1 NUMBER OF NOOPrI W F O �'4U A '\---\ \ PARCEL T - \ AVERAGE SS OAAI BI EX ACCESS �- �TN� vv / I II I , I� ° 154.323 SF �_. I _ �.. v v`Z)7 r D 4 LL �0 �` \\ / / 3.54 ACRES v \'D L �� vv ADJOINING RECOR 13 GF R/ ® ) --- v v ' - / l V A A _ SC2pOL DISTRICT ��\V A: v I L^ A p A� PUBLIC UTILRIES• � � I 1 li ° IV I A III �V / L - PROPOSED vv \ EASEMENT \ V / ) 1 '_ �� ER. CYIND PIPELINE EASEMENT A i / 'KPER INST, rvG zoDo-Dserra v _ z REC. O D O G.R. A �I % i' I AV _ FOR s6iNE� ONE PORPoses EASEMENT A I II I -' � NOTES ) / / �� A __ 63 AN. 9N V7 A I 0000 Y�I Iv Rd'tu�4%. v��Is i • A EX WATER LINE SNe _ E% 6AS LINE STUV I ppp PROP. PARCEL ONE YX As �T �� ' P,ARC-�'L i i®kS 61ai ®l� T �- NOTE. APECFS( V z �;., / / 254,114 SF i - - `ice___ TV 212/90 PAncos �� PROP. R/W DEDICATION �' I f,� -� - E% BOUNDARY 4 R� ,583. ACRES TUG. 314i1 �� � C>/ / / V ttr� i _ �- a / IF F EX, JOINT UTILITY CGND R / V UO4T OF 4XX - / - &dLIN ®LEE[ (-y IL( \ i 1 / / �- 4• _ _ s ED IX. WATER MAIN _ SIDEWALK F _ .fk r_�STSRM RAT A SEWER RE LINE \ OW®�E2WV�IEI D ,� A \ IX. MrnxOERINa smE \� E% JOINT UTILITY FIBER EX. TER I I,. 2 MQL�QaT \ v \V < vs FSA\ PON PJYI TFFIe l95151A3 '� \ . OPPOSE \ A BO \ 0 0a 02 08 y_ ��� - 'l• r i PION OF THE SOUTHEAST V4 OF IN SIX TOWNSHIP S SOUTH, RAGE 0 BAN BERNAND ID BABE AND MERIDIAN OOESS AID PARKING AM 2 F-Crtv LIM1 LINE J EPP_) M COVOURO OF "'+YgrE, WNE azxD AVENUE v 0 COTT DIF C' C07V or EX QUOIWT& E ONIXOD ITS SHOWN ON THIS IMP, DUCTS AND DRESS AND EGRESS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR IF L L,J)����yy -:.w @x 600NDARr No oe ___ \ _ -/ \. \ �s s'y+,.., cTAmPIc CI N.TS.M N` 26oeD'� `u c, sJs aG _ ( O, aG eo' 1z0' Ifio' ! szuD Aec •EVI A `1 VAL Nh'y / o�zoal z2 - - ^r—_-_ �, \ v3 f Lh:SLSCSL`)OSSSEM NMILDDOCAL CENTER —"� \ '// rL - 1 - v - ' \SCALE 1'-40- GJECT NAME• LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY V / v v /` MAP NUMBER• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36405 {����: 1�b�'✓DD Q�I•C��� �' �� ���LY ) A PLAN TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP \ L O ✓ /"q Y ® ®5 V l� / / v, p E%MBIT DATE JULV 28, PO 2 OWNEfl / DEVELOPERS HAWTHORN RETIREMENT GROUP LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS ?` EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS / - EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE E) EAST _— EXISTING CONTOURS XF,EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 4N) NORTH Q EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA -s..-. EXISTING SEWER E%ISiING SEWER FORCE MAIN (SJ) LW 0.0 SOUTH WEST ASPHALT CONCRETE - < EXISTING CABLE w EXISTING WATER AS ACREAGE ADD ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER o^u --.---- EXISTING IRRIGATION GRAIN LINE p^"�'�^'^-'�"""� EXISTING BOUNDARY -- - - - EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND PARCEL FINE CPS CURB AND CUTTER FEE EDGE OF PAVEMENT -- -- - E EXISTING ELECTRIC - - PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE ESML EASEMENT -- ---- EXISTING GAS PROPOSED CURB E%. EXISTING m EXISTING IRRIGATION PROPOSED EASEMENT SEC. GROUND NAIVE VEGETATION MA%. MAXIMUM -- - EXISTING LOT LINE PROPOSED LOT LINE MIN. MINIMUM - T - EXISTING TELEPHONE - - PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY N0. NUMBER N.T.S- NOT TO SCALE E%. E%. BELL PROPERTY ONE R/w R/W PROP. PROPOSED 20, 20i DUE. PUBLIC V➢On EASEMENT EXISTPO EXISTING 80R/W AND IMPROVEMENTS PER PARCEL MAP 31116 EXISTING R/W RIGHT OF WAY UNPSCARE IANDSCAPE R RAPIDS FISEMENF 12' 22' D' 1 B' 22' 12 PAVEMENT SF SQUARE FEET STO. STANDARD nP. nPICAL Z •- MAX E=Rc RAISENEX, EEX_Ac_ 2z W �2 L:. MAX - iO,.•_ E% MEANDERING ' rt E%_ MEANDERING SIDEWALK SECTION A -A SIDEWALK '- SEELEY DRIVE (EXISTING STREET) (NOT -CONFORMING AI S 98062-8210 471 HIGH MSA CONSULTING, INC. SHED 41 PI-ANNMO P Clm. ENau Wawa E LAND SxAvBrmO ' 34NO Boo HOPE DAWB E RANCHO MuSum m CA 92270 OF TBLeexoNB (760) 320-98H E PAK (760) 323-7893 1 JULIAN A. DE LA TORRE PE C43880 SHEETS ATTACHMENT 6 A I I AUMMtN I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING A special meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA April 4, 2012 I. CALL TO ORDER 10:05 a.m. A. This regular meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee was called to order at 10:05 a.m. by Planning Manager David Sawyer who led the Committee in the flag salute. B. Committee Members Present: Richard Gray, Kevin McCune, and Ray Rooker Committee Member Absent: None C. Staff present: Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit, and Secretary Monika Radeva. II. PUBLIC COMMENT: None III. CONFIRMATION OF THE AGENDA: Confirmed IV. CONSENT CALENDAR: Staff asked if there were any changes to the Minutes of January 4, 2012. There being no comments or corrections it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Rooker/McCune to approve the minutes as submitted. AYES: Committee Members McCune and Rooker. NOES: None.. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Committee Member Gray. V. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Site Development Permit 2006-863, Amendment NO. 1 has been submitted by AV Construction, LLC. for consideration of Architectural, and Unit Landscaping Plans for Alta Verde Coral Mountain (formerly Pasatiempo); Tract 34243; located on the north side of Avenue 58, A mile west of Madison Street. Principal Planner Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. 6 3 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Planning Manager Sawyer asked the Committee if there were any questions of staff: Committee Member Gray asked if the project improvements had been completed. Staff replied that they had. There being no further questions of staff, Planning Manager Sawyer said the applicant had prepared a presentation that they would like to show to the Committee. Mr. Andrew Adler, CEO of Alta Verde Group, 315 S. Beverly Drive, Ste 208, Beverly Hills, CA, introduced himself and gave a brief overview of the company's history and experience, explained the applicant's intent for the proposed project, and described in detail why the architectural design and features were chosen. Mr. Adler noted that the three existing model homes were being repainted to match the proposed development color palette and some design elements that had been perceived as overly ornate had been removed to make them blend in with the new architectural design. Mr. Adler said all of the proposed homes have basic solar systems installed, therefore, a portion of the roofs were flat. He explained the homeowners would be given the opportunity to upgrade from basic solar to level two, three, and so forth, at the time of purchase, and increase the energy efficiency of the house. Mr. Anthony Poon, Principal With Poon Design, Inc., 315 South Beverly Drive, Ste 206, Beverly Hills, CA, introduced himself and said the architectural style was inspired a lot by the Tuscan Italian style in its simplicity and honesty, speaking with the quality of the materials instead of the use of ornaments. He gave a brief overview of the three different color palettes used, as well as the difference of the front doors, garage doors, window color frames, etc. Mr. Adler said the final product was four types of homes with. different facades that did not incorporate a lot of ornate elements, the architecture had been left simple, and the landscaping variety had been used almost as a decorative feature. P.\Reports - ALRC120121ALRC 9-13-12\ALRC Min_4-4-12 Approved.doc 2 6A Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Mr. Adler explained there were six different color palettes combined with three different landscape palettes which essentially create different type homes. Mr. Adler said general improvements had already been made to the site, expected pre -sale date of the homes was to begin in September of 2012, with actual construction commencing at the beginning of 2013. Committee Member Gray asked if there were any sidewalks around the property. Mr. Adler replied there were existing sidewalks within the development leading to the park area which would also be used as a retention basin. Committee Member Gray asked where the pool equipment would be located on the lots. Mr. Adler replied there hadn't been a particular location selected for the pool equipment as it would have to be determined on a case -by -case basis. If there was an accessory structure, it would most likely be placed on the side of it, and if there were no accessory structure, it would be placed on the side of the landscaping wall Committee Member McCune asked staff what was the required setback for an accessory structure. Principal Planner Nesbit explained what the code requirements were in terms of size, height, and setbacks. Committee Member McCune asked if the pools would be built as part of the homes. Mr. Adler replied the proposed pools and open pool structures/cabanas would be offered as an option to the homeowners. He explained there would be three different pool types available to choose from and the proposed accessory structures would be in compliance with the City code requirements in terms of height and setbacks. Committee Member McCune asked if the pools would have a spa. Mr. Adler said the spa would also be an option for the homeowner to choose from; however, the spa would be incorporated into the pool, leaving the pool size the same. Committee Member McCune asked about the solar option offered with the homes. Mr. Adler explained that the homes would have P:\Reports- ALRC12012W1LRC_9-13-12WLRC Min_4-4-12_Approved.doc 3 6 ;5 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 base solar system already installed with the inverter located in the garage. Thus, the solar foundation would be in place and it would be up to the owner to decide whether or not to expand upon it. He said provided that the solar tax rebates were still available, it would cover the cost of the upgrade for the homeowner. Committee Member Gray asked if the parapet roof wall would be tall enough to hide the solar panels. Mr. Adler replied it would. Committee Member Gray asked what materials would be used for the pools. Mr. Adler replied it would either be plaster or pebble tech. Committee Member Rooker said he very much liked the project. He expressed a concern regarding the large amount of exposed windows incorporated into the proposed architectural design that were not protected by either an awning or some type of a roof covering which might become an issue during the hot summer months in the desert. He also noted that the proposed the French doors, opening outward, on the back of the homes facing the backyards were too close to the pool and suggested that those be replaced with sliders to eliminate any possible functional issues with the lack of space. Mr. Adler said the design team had performed detailed incremental studies on the homes in order to ensure that they meet or exceed the established requirements by fifteen percent in order to receive the solar tax credits available. He explained that the orientation of the homes was designed from east to west so that the majority of the exposed windows were not in direct sunlight during the day. He noted that the windows located on the north and south sides of the homes, which would be directly exposed to the sun, had some type of a window treatment. He explained in detail the different - window treatments used and the measures that had been taken in order to ensure compliance with Title 24 requirements. Committee Member Rooker said he would have liked for the proposed color palette to be a bit deeper and richer. He also suggested the use of a fuller and richer landscaping palette in order to soften the architectural lines and make the homes appear lusher, as he found the proposed landscaping palette to be a bit scarce. Mr. Adler replied he was a big supporter of lush landscaping; P:\Reports - ALRC12012\ALRC_9-l3-12\ALRC Min_4-4-12_APProved.doc 4 Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 however, it was against almost all of the current desert scape mandates and water efficiency requirements. ,He explained why the proposed landscaping palette was chosen and how it was used to make the homes appear plusher. Discussion followed regarding the overall landscaping of the project, the types of trees and brushes used, the shortcomings of the landscape renderings failing to provide a realistic image of what would be actually installed on site, etc. Mr. Chuck Shepardson, ASLA, President of HSA Design Group, 76- 255 Via Sovana, Indian Wells, CA 92210, introduced himself and said that the selected shrub material consisting of Ocotillos, Agaves, Yuccas, etc. were intentionally selected as they would keep their shape and structure over time in comparison with the use of Bougainvillea type shrub material which would be in the hands of whoever would be handling it. Mr. Adler said that he concurred with the architectural team's suggestion to add palm trees to the proposed landscaping palette to give the project an oasis/resort-type feel. Committee Member Gray asked if palm trees would be installed in the front yards. Mr. Adler confirmed. Committee Member Gray asked if landscaping would be installed in the rear yards. Mr. Adler replied that no landscaping would be provided, but the homeowners would have the option to have the developer install the landscaping in the rear yards as an upgrade and choose from three different landscaping design plans. Committee Member Gray asked what landscaping would be installed at the retention basin greenway. Mr. Adler replied that no changes would be made to it. Committee Member McCune asked if it had been maintained over the years. Mr. Adler replied that recently it had been completely redone. Mr. Russell Jones, Construction Manager for Alta Verde Builders, 71-905 Highway 111, Ste G, Rancho Mirage, CA, introduced P.\Reports - ALRC\2012WLRC_9-13.12\ALRC Min_4-4-12_Approved.doc 5 6,i Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 himself and gave an overview of the landscaping of the retention basin and the common areas outside and inside the gates. Committee Member McCune asked if the homes facing the retention basin through therearyards would have a lower back wall than the rest of the homes within the development. Mr. Adler replied that the CC&Rs required that metal fences be installed for the back yards of those homes and that there would be no access to the greenway through the back yards. Discussion followed regarding the treatment for the metal fence and the height and type of retention wall that surrounds the greenway. Committee Member Rooker asked if there was any way to mandate the homeowners to landscape the back yards. Mr. Adler said that such a mandate would not be easily enforceable and explained why. Committee Member Gray asked if any patio area would be provided for the back yards if the homeowners do not select a pool upgrade option. Mr. Adler replied a basic pad would be provided and described its dimensions and finish. Discussion followed regarding different finish options for the concrete for the driveways, the patios, and how those would blend in with the proposed architecture. Discussion followed regarding the height, slopes, and design of the roof lines, drainage lines, etc. Committee Member Rooker suggested to leave the comments made by the Committee on the project merely as comments and not include them in the motion, so that the approval of the project is not contingent upon them. Mr. Adler asked the Committee to consider removing bullet points A and B under recommendation #2 of the staff report requesting that the applicant change the arched doors, windows and openings for the existing Lot 40 unit, to make them consistent with the new unit types, and to install a stone veneer treatment on the facade of at least one of the existing units. P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_9-13-12\ALRC Min_4-4-12_Approved.doe 6 6'g Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 Mr. Jones said the side walls of the existing units facing the street were currently slump -stone stucco. He noted that those would be replaced with split -face precision block which would help create a similar stone look in between each house. Mr. Adler added that they would like to not have to structurally tear down the existing units and leave them as they were. He explained that metal awnings were being added to the windows and the doors which would hide the existing arches over them. Upon being asked if that addressed staff's concerns, Planning Manger Sawyer noted that staff would like to keep the recommendations as listed in the staff report to ensure consistency within the development. Committee Member Gray asked what color had been selected for the side metal gates of the homes. Mr. Adler said that detail had not yet been finalized, but it would most likely be a soft tan color. The Committee would like the applicant to consider the following comments and suggestions: • Use of sliding doors vs. French doors at rear of units • Possible dog wiring area in common greenbelt • Add better window treatments for sun protection • Deepen / darken the proposed color palette • Add more landscaping and lusher materials to the proposed landscaping palette There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members McCune/Rooker to adopt Minute Motion 2012-003, recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2006-863, Amendment No. 1, as submitted with staff's recommendations, but modifying bullet point A to say: "All arched doors, windows and openings on the existing units shall be covered with painted metal screen awnings, consistent in design with those of the new unit types. and deleting bullet point B from recommendation #2. Unanimously approved. P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_9-13-12WLRC Min_4.4-12_Approved.doc 7 6 q Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee Minutes April 4, 2012 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER ITEMS: Committee Member Rooker said he was not pleased with the status change of the Committee to City employees. Staff explained the reasons that had made the status change necessary. General discussion followed regarding the status change and similar changes that had been implemented in the surrounding cities in the Coachella Valley. Vill. PLANNING STAFF ITEMS: Planning Manager Sawyer gave an overview of the: cases that had been presented to the Planning Commission for review and consideration and the actions taken. IX. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members McCune/Gray to adjourn this meeting of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee to a Regular Meeting to be held on May 2, 2012. This meeting was adjourned at 11:28 a.m. on April 4, 2012. P:\Reports - ALRC\2012\ALRC_9-13-12\ALRC Min 4-4-12_Approved.doc 8 6]p ATTACHMENT 8 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA September 25, 2012 IV. iM CALL TO ORDER A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta order at 7:01 p.m. by Chairwoman 8 Commissioners Chairwoman B, STAFF PRESENT: 7:01 p.m. was called to Wright and Johnson, Public Works Planning Manager David Jay Wuu, Senior Code Anthony Moreno, and Ir suggestions, it was moved by Commissioners the minutes of September 11, 2012, as approved. Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 4, Environmental Assessment 201 1-617, General Plan Amendment 2011-123, Zone Change 2011-140, Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3, Tentative Parcel Map 36405, Site Development Permit 2011-921: a request by Lenity Group, LLC to consider a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the development plans for the La Quinta Retirement Community to be located on Seeley Drive, east of Washington Street, south of Miles Avenue, within Centre Pointe. Planning Commission Minutes September 25, 2012 Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department. Staff noted a memo was distributed to the Commissioners, at the meeting, recommending changes to several conditions of approval for the Tentative Parcel Map and the Site Development Permit. A copy of that memo is also on file in the Planning Department. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were Commissioner Alderson commented • Possible neighborhood • Matching architectural • Surrounding properties Staff responded on: • The two cor�gwplga +,meetings i neighbors had ' : ty op ito • The developer's emp = bes , heir abili • ra the ne ! inity a on: other of staff. the area. line the developer and the site lines. styles, to the • No _ n of s ding parcel owners and confirmation of eigh od rr win s. • cern the location of the trash enclosures and potential • Clarifttion on the discussion on pad elevations is W Director Tim Jonasson explain the word "pad" was in the conditions of approval, to clarify the applicant had to be one-half foot of the pad elevations of their tentative plan. There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if the applicant would like to speak. Mr. Dan Roach, Lenity Architecture, 3150 Kettle Court SE, Salem, OR 93701, introduced himself and commented on the neighborhood meetings, saying the neighbors were in favor of the development and 612 Planning Commission Minutes September 25, 2012 happy to see a good development go in. He commented on: • Timing of the development phases. • Explanation of placement of the trash enclosures and noise issues. • Involvement with the Fire De pa nt in appropriate discussions. , Commissioner Wilkinson asked the a '_out the addition of solar panels. 5, s.. " Mr. Roach said they had look r� o and it was ng".hh„ luded, at this time, due to cost. c; 6 General discussion followed on: • The feasibilitji ding solar _ how the project needed to remain afforda a • Including solar a later'" '" k • Reit a n of co n e 5 don of trash enclosures and ernativ uding e possibility of requesting rtec b nsitive a hours of pick up. >ws dd%p ited on the ALRC recommendation for and the use of LED bulbs. General'"• '. ussio N lowed on the use of alumnawood awnings, the color palet and w ndow coverings/overhangs/recesses. rrows said she would like to see all of the ALRC s incorporated into the conditions. Mr. Roach responded that was acceptable, Mr. Marvin Roos, Mainiero, Smith & Associates, Inc., 34-200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage 92270 introduced himself and gave further explanation on the memo that had been distributed, at the dais, to the Planning Commission; as well as expanded upon the pad heights. 613 -3- Planning Commission Minutes September 25, 2012 There being no further public comment, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for Commission discussion. Chairwoman Barrows said she would like to require a condition that all windows either be recessed or have window coverings. Chairwoman Barrows re -opened the public g to allow a comment from the applicant. Mr. Roach explained they would b bVn Lo g � rated windows as they were a Title 24 reouirement.: ,E , Mr. Marvin Roos, explained t ash encl%ure was sidaded which results in a quieter procedure ,ding. He also commented on the distance of the trash anfrom nearby residents, and said they could take,00k at theClonwith staff. The public hearing There bein r fi seconde_, 2012 rec 201,T ° t� 7 as sum 006, 1 closed again. pussion, it was moved and i ' ilkinson to adopt Resolution of Environmental Assessment approved. kI sfrns or discussion, it was moved and on Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution ig approval of Development Agreement 2003- submitted. Unanimously approved. further questions or discussion, it was moved and -nmissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution mending approval of General Plan Amendment 2011- I. Unanimously approved. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2012-022 recommending approval of Zone Change 2011-140 as submitted. Unanimously approved. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution °- 614 Planning Commission Minutes September 25, 2012 2012-023 recommending approval of Specific Plan 2001-055, Amendment 3, as submitted. subject to the attached conditions - Unanimously approved. There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2012-024 recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 36405 as submitted, with Conditions 29, 54, and 44 a ended as noted in the memo distributed to the Commissioners piior to the meeting. Unanimously approved. _ There being no further questions r scussr�it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Ald_ - " [Wilkinson'- __adopt Resolution 2012 025 recommending appr of Site Develop. Permit 2011- 921 as submitted, with Con s 28, 4 and 37 and ` d as noted in the memo distributed to th mmers prior to e meeting. Unanimously approved. VI. BUSINESS ITEMS ctWOMEN A. Notice of Public Nuisance se N 196quest by Scott Holmes, President o^perty'dkated evelo nt LC to consider an appeal of Public Nuirminati ding th maintenance of Parcel 779- 152-01 - at 30 Calle Cadiz. Code Enfab a �s nth Moreno presented the staff report, a co ,, of whi - file in jar ning Department. if there were any questions of staff. ented on: ilding code and security. ssibility of verbage being included, in the Application for , so residents understand the Commission will only be ng whether a nuisance exists(ed) or not. Code Enforcement Officer Moreno gave an explanation of how the appeal process was presented to their clients. He added information on how it is the City's desire to meet with applicant's to identify what the issues are and what corrective measures are needed. He then explained why this particular applicant chose to make application for appeal to the Planning G 1.5 -5-