2012 10 23 PCPlanning Commission agendas and staff
reports are now available on the City's
web page: www.le-auinta.om
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta
REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2012 AT 7:00 P.M.
Beginning Resolution No. 2012-026
Minute Motion No. 2012-007
CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any
matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and
limit your comments to three minutes.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of the minutes of September 25, 2012
PUBLIC HEARINGS
For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must
be filed with the Executive Secretary prior to consideration of that item.
A person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If
you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence
delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing.
1. Consideration of Site Development Permit 2012-923 submitted by Master
Association of Rancho La Quinta for Development Plans for the expansion of
the Rancho La Quinta Jefferson Street Gatehouse, located at 49-003
Jefferson Street.
2. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit 2012-145 submitted by Tait &
Associates, Inc. for a proposal to allow four (4) temporary metal storage
containers during the 2012 Holiday Season. The containers are to be
located at the Walmart Supercenter — 79-295 Highway 111.
3. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2012-109 submitted by the
City of La Quinta for Amendment to Title 9, Chapter 9.150 of the Municipal
Code to add provisions to allow tandem parking within certain residential
districts.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Planning Commission Work
Program.
CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL
COMMISSIONER ITEMS
1. Report on City Council meetings of October 2 and 16, 2012
2. Commissioner Wilkinson is scheduled to attend the November 6, 2012, City
Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on November 13,
2012, commencing at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle
Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253.
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Carolyn Walker, Executive Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare
that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting was
posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and
the bulletin boards at 78-630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at
51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on October 17, 2012.
DA
TED: October 17, 2012
Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
PUBLIC NOTICES
The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed
for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made.
If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Commission, arrangements
should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week
notice is required.
If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Planning Commission
meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied
to the Executive Secretary for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the
beginning of the meeting.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item(s) on this
agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Planning Department's counter at City
Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours.
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA
September 25, 2012
CALL TO ORDER
A. A regular meeting of the La Quinta
order at 7:01 p.m. by Chairwoman B
PRESENT: Commissioners Ald Weber,
Chairwoman Barr
ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT:
II. PUBLIC
7:01 p.m.
was called to
Wright and
A Director es Johnson, Public Works
rTim Jona Planning Manager David
)iiker
te PI Jay Wuu, Senior Code
once thony Moreno, and
�e olvn Walker.
III. CONFIRMAT F A:.' Confirmed
im
IV. bALEN
ere being noq me r suggestions, it was moved by Commissioners
t/Wilkinson approve the minutes of September 11, 2012, as
su d. Unarn 4 usly approved.
V. PUBLIC
A. Development Agreement 2003-006 Amendment 4, Environmental
Assessment 201 1-617, General Plan Amendment 2011-123, Zone
Change 2011-140, Specific Plan 2001-055 Amendment 3, Tentative
Parcel Map 36405, Site Development Permit 2011-921: a request by
Lenity Group, LLC to consider a recommendation to the City Council
for approval of the development plans for the La Quinta Retirement
Community to be located on Seeley Drive, east of Washington Street,
south of Miles Avenue, within Centre Pointe.
Planning Commission Minutes
September 25, 2012
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of
which is on file in the Planning Department. Staff noted a memo was
distributed to the Commissioners, at the meeting, recommending
changes to several conditions of approval for the Tentative Parcel Map
and the Site Development Permit. A copy of that memo is also on file
in the Planning Department.
Chairwoman Barrows asked if there were any , . stions of staff.
Discussion covered the neighborhood ngs, design styles and
compatibility, pad elevations and conc :r the placement of the
trash enclosures.'
There being no further questio 11110 staff, Chairwor ** ,.,,;Barrows asked
if the applicant would like to
Mr. Dan Roach, Lenity Architect Kettle Court SE, Salem, OR
93701, introduced self and ented on the neighborhood
meetings, saying th' x ;" ors were i or of the development and
happy to see a good "" a t go in. *added information on the
timing of the develop t pha ' "�v expla ion of the placement of
the trash osures, dis 'th the Fire Department as
appropr Ft w
Disc n cove ,V pos ity of the inclusion of solar panels and
the ap t' on it cost; as well as the possible use of
Ip�bulb ow sha' ai d alumnawood awnings.
-
Chair '... t an ws said she would like to see all of the ALRC
recomm ........ tion ,:, rporated into the conditions.
Roach N onded that was acceptable.
a 'i`$Roos, Mainiero, Smith & Associates, Inc., 34-200 Bob
Hop ` e, Rancho Mirage 92270 introduced himself and gave
further explanation on the memo that had been distributed, at the
dais, to the Planning Commission; as well as an explanation of the pad
heights.
There being no further public comment, Chairwoman Barrows closed
the public hearing portion of the meeting and opened the matter for
Commission discussion.
Ewa
Planning Commission Minutes
September 25, 2012
Chairwoman Barrows said she would like to require a condition that all
windows either be recessed or have window coverings and re -opened
the public comment period to allow a response from the applicant and
his representative.
Mr. Roach explained they would be using Low E rated windows as
they were a Title 24 requirement.
Mr. Marvin Roos, explained the trash enclos ,,,Ovias side -loaded which
resulted in a quieter procedure than fron# ing. He also commented
on the distance of the trash enclosurx--nearby residents, and
said they would work with staff on tbl
The public hearing portion of theeting was
There being no further ques or dje i'sion, it we oved and
seconded by Commissioners Al kinson to adopt Resolution
2012-019 recommending approv �f Environmental Assessment
2011-617 as submi animously oved.
There being no furth ues .: discon, it was moved and
seconded ite%,
Commissirs ''Ikinson to adopt Resolution
2012-0 endinal ofeiielopment Agreement 2003-
006,, ; as su ,.. ed. Unanimously approved.
There g n que s or discussion, it was moved and
seconde � mmis Iderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
21 mending roval of General Plan Amendment 2011-
123 bml Unanimously approved.
There bei ono fu - er questions or discussion, it was moved and
econded Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
12-022 Wi ommending approval of Zone Change 2011-140 as
siitteilanimously approved.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2012-023 recommending approval of Specific Plan 2001-055,
Amendment 3, as submitted. Unanimously approved.
There being no further questions or discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2012-024 recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 36405 as
-3-
Planning Commission Minutes
September 25, 2012
submitted, with Conditions 29, 54, and 44 amended as noted in the
memo distributed to the Commissioners, prior to the meeting.
Unanimously approved.
There being no further questions or. discussion, it was moved and
seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution
2012-025 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2011-
921 as submitted, with Conditions 28, 46, an7 amended as noted
in the memo distributed to the Commissio�:Y prior to the meeting.
Unanimously approved.,
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Notice of Public Nuisance Case No A- "`4196: a requesta .Scott Holmes,
President of 92253 Development mpany, C to consi n appeal of
Public Nuisance Determination rey g t ". aintenancarcel 779-
152-012, property located at 78 03y `r`adiz.
Code Enforcement Off ony Moreiti presented the staff report, a
_`
copy of which is on file )il@p 1e" 'ng Depa nt.
Chairwoman Brws aske theme ", „oquestions of staff.
Commis rs dis sed thc3dding code and security of abandoned
properties::?s well the pos ty of including an explanation, in the
Applicatio'f 6 r r elpi residents understand the Planning
Commission
'` the a" pryocess.
'Code En menicer Moreno gave an explanation of how the appeal
process w`a sent ' clients and the City's desire, and preference, to
ork with cents on c�rective measures. He indicated the Commissioner
ments, on �dmg an explanation to the public, would be taken into
There 'o further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows asked if
the applic nt was present and would like to speak.
There being no applicant present, or any further public comment,
Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing portion of the meeting and
opened the matter for Commission discussion.
There being no questions or discussion, it was moved and seconded by
Commissioners Wilkinson/Wright to adopt Minute Motion 2012-006
4-
Planning Commission Minutes
September 25, 2012
upholding. the determination that a public nuisance exists at the
aforementioned parcel/address with reference to Case No. 12-4196.
Unanimously approved.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL:
A. None.
VIII. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A. Commissioner Alderson reported on Council Meeting of
September 18, 2012.
B. Chairwoman Barrows is Schad :to report back bfte October 2,
2012, City Council meeting "•
C. Planning Director Johnson stater nt City Council/Commission
would be held on Ja ry 22, 201 tead of the Fall of the year as
has been the pract1 fast He ented on possible changes
in the format of t $ - nigift and sa rther details would be
forthcoming.
IX: DIRECTOR IT,
A. Upd f LQ 20. eneral .. w review by City Council.
X.
B. -,-,,Update oik�.,...' ` mg Co iofi's 2012/2013 Work Program.
`. ,� being n ', urtheP' business, it was moved by Commissioners
AI n/Wright djourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission
to th8t rag00meeting to be held on October 9, 2012. This regular
meeting binned at 8:28 p.m. on September 25, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
Carolyn Walker, Executive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
-5-
STAFF REPORT PH 1
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2012
CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
APPLICANT: MASTER ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO LA QUINTA
PROPERTY OWNER: TD DESERT DEV, LTD PARTNERSHIP
ARCHITECT: CURTIS SHUPE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT: CURTIS SHUPE DESIGN
ENGINEER: CURTIS SHUPE DESIGN
REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF SITE, ARCHITECTURAL, AND
LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE
RANCHO LA QUINTA JEFFERSON STREET GATEHOUSE
LOCATION: 49-003 JEFFERSON STREET
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATION: THE LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS
DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION
15303 (CLASS 3) OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN THAT THE
PROPOSED PROJECT IS AN EXPANSION OF A SMALL
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)
ZONING
DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
SURROUNDING
ZONING/LAND USES:
NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
EXISTING CVWD WELL SITE
SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL)
PAReports - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\01 REPORT.docx Page i of 4
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
EAST: CITY OF INDIO
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
WEST: GOLF COURSE (GC)
EXISTING GOLF COURSE
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012- , approving Site Development
Permit 2012-923, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Rancho La Quinta Master Association is proposing to expand the existing
Jefferson Street gatehouse. The proposed addition is approximately 408 square
feet, resulting in a 720 square foot gatehouse.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Jefferson Street gatehouse for Rancho La Quinta is located at the western
terminus of Avenue 49 and Jefferson Street (Attachment 1, Sheet 1). The existing
gatehouse, which was approved and constructed in 2003, consists of an office
area and restroom. The expansion consists of an open floor area for the purpose of
security equipment storage. Internal access from the existing gatehouse to the
expanded area is proposed, as well as an access door on the southern building
elevation.
The expansion of the gatehouse will be to the east of the existing structure
(Attachment 1, Sheet 2). An existing paved parking area and landscaping will be
removed. Established resident/guest circulation routes and vehicular stacking
capabilities will not be modified.
The proposed gatehouse expansion has been designed to be consistent with the
architectural style of the existing gatehouse. This includes architectural elements
such as the use of a smooth plaster finish as the primary exterior building material
and the use of concrete "S" the roofing. No roof -mounted mechanical equipment is
proposed. The gatehouse expansion, at the highest ridgeline, is approximately 151-
3" in height (Attachment 1, Sheet 4).
A 5-foot wide landscaped planter area is proposed around the perimeter of the
expanded gatehouse (Attachment 1, Sheet 2). The new planter will be a
continuation of the existing planter area, with the same plants and shrubs
incorporated into the plant palette. All other landscaped areas within the entrance
area will remain as is.
P:\Reports • PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLO GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\Ot REPORT.docx Page 2 of 4
Per La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.090, increases in building square
footage exceeding ten percent from the original approval requires the approval of a
site development permit. The gatehouse expansion will increase the existing 312
square foot building by 408 square feet, or over 130% of the existing building
area.
Staff finds that the overall design of the proposed gatehouse expansion to be
acceptable. The architectural style and layout of the expansion matches the
existing gatehouse. Except for the Jefferson Street setback, the expansion of,the
gatehouse meets all development standards, including property setbacks and height
requirements.
By Code, the required setback from the Jefferson Street property line is 20 feet.
The applicant has proposed an 18-foot setback from the property line. In order to
accommodate the proposed 18-foot setback, the applicant requested Planning
Director approval of a minor adjustment application, which could allow a deviation
of up to ten percent of the required setback. The Planning Director approved Minor
Adjustment 2012-655 on October 12, 2012, which reduced the required setback
from 20 feet to 18 feet, as proposed.
AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW:
Public Agency Review:
This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public
agencies on October 4, 2012. All written comments received are on file and
available for review with the Planning Department. All applicable comments have
been incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval.
Public Notice:
This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 12, 2012,
and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no
comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written
comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing.
ALRC RECOMMENDATION:
On October 15, 2012, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee'
reviewed these site, architectural, and landscaping plans, and unanimously
recommended approval of the site development permit (Attachment 2).
PAReports - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\01 REPORT.docx Page 3 of 4
The ALRC was generally pleased with the proposal, subject to a condition that the
additional landscaping being provided consist of plants and shrubs that are more
robust and provide contrast to the bare elevations of the expanded gatehouse. A
condition of approval has been added to reflect their recommendation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this project is exempt from
environmental review pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3) of the California
Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project is an expansion of a small
accessory structure.
Respectfully submitted,
---------------- -- p0
JAY WUU, Associate Pla ner
Attachments:
1. Rancho La Quinta Gatehouse Expansion Site Development Permit Packet
2. Minutes of October 15, 2012 ALRC meeting
P:\Reports - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\01 REPORT.docx Page 4 of 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE
JEFFERSON STREET GATEHOUSE FOR RANCHO LA
QUINTA
CASE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
APPLICANT: LENITY GROUP, LLC
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California did, on the 23rd day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider a request by the Master Association of Rancho La Quinta for approval
of site, architectural, and landscaping plans for the Jefferson Street gatehouse
expansion, generally located at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 49,
more particularly described as:
APN: 602-370-025
WHEREAS, the Planning Department published a public hearing notice
in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 12, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal
Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500
feet of the site; and,
WHEREAS, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee of
the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 15" day of October, 2012, hold a
public meeting to review and discuss site, architectural, and landscape plans, the
minutes of said meeting were included in the staff report for consideration by the
Planning Commission; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to
Section 9.216.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site
Development Permit:
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as it
proposes a building expansion for an existing use that is consistent with
the General Plan designation for LDR (Low Density Residential)
development.
Planning Commission Resolution 2012-
Site Development Permit 2012-923
Rancho La Quinta Gatehouse
Page 2
2. Consistency with the Zoning Code
The proposed project is consistent with the requirements of the La Quinta
Zoning Code, in that the building expansion will support existing uses
consistent with those permitted in the Low Density Residential district,
and meets the standards of this district.
3. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this project is
exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3)
of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project is
an expansion of a small accessory structure.
4. Architectural Design
The architectural design of the proposed project, including the
architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural
details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with
surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the
city. The proposed gatehouse expansion is designed to match the style
and layout of the existing gatehouse.
5. Site Design
The site design of the proposed project, as conditioned, will be
compatible with, and not detrimental to, the surrounding development
and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The design of the
expanded gatehouse has a limited impact on existing vehicular and
pedestrian circulation routes.
6. Landscape Design
The proposed project landscaping has been designed so as to provide
visual relief and provide a harmonious transition between the existing
gatehouse and expanded area. Proposed landscaped areas are consistent
with the existing landscaping standards and plant palette.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the
Planning Commission in this case;
Planning Commission Resolution 2012-
Site Development Permit 2012-923
Rancho La Quinta Gatehouse
Page 3
2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Site Development
Permit 2012-923 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject
to the attached Conditions of Approval.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a
Quinta Planning Commission held on this 23rd day
following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
LES JOHNSON, Planning Director
City of La Quinta, California
regular meeting of the La
of October, 2012, by the
KATIE BARROWS, Chairperson
City of La Quinta, California
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
GENERAL
1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La
Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or
proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site
Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense
counsel.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding
and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
2. This permit shall expire on October 23, 2014, unless a building permit has been
finalized and/or a time extension is applied for and granted by the Planning
Commission pursuant to Section 9.200.080 of the Zoning Code.
3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City,
the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the
following agencies, if required:
• Riverside County Fire Marshal
• La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public
Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management
Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement
Permit)
• La Quinta Planning Department
• Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)
• Imperial Irrigation District (IID)
• California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)
• State Water Resources Control Board
The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances
from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of
PAReports - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\03 COAS.doc - Page 1 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when
submitting those improvements plans for City approval.
4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES
stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 at seq. (Stormwater
Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water);
Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. 137-2008-0001
and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and
Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.
5. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the
Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building
permit(s).
6. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for
any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless
specifically identified in the following conditions of approval.
7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the
invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to
review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by
these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any
documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these
conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without
deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a
material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the
invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for
engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any
documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid
in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to
make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval.
STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
9. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060
(Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100
PAReports - PCX201 ZPC_10-23-12\RLG GATEHOUSE EXPANSION103 COAS.doe Page 2 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
(Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and
Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are
proposed.
10. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City -
adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by
the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking
areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California.
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as
"engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refers to persons currently certified or licensed
to practice their respective professions in the State of California.
11. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of
qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the
provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans).
12. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review
and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each
line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum
scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing.
Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is
desired. Note, theapplicant may be required to prepare other improvement
plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and
utility purveyors.
A. Precise Grading Plan 1" = 20' Horizontal
Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not
listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to
commencing plan preparation.
13. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of
the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2010
California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door.
The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building &
Safety Department.
PAReporte - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\03 COAS.doc Page 3 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
14. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on
a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars).
15. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the
improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible
record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City.
Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and
signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness
of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously
submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant
shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of
the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record
Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by
the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of
Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of
mylar submittal.
GRADING
16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050
(Grading Improvements).
17. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes,
the applicant shall obtain a precise grading permit approved by the City
Engineer.
18. To obtain an approved precise grading permit, the applicant shall submit and
obtain approval of all of the following:
A. A precise grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State
of California,
B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional
registered in the State of California,
C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan (if required) prepared in accordance with
LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control).
PAReports - PC1201 ZPC_10-23-121RLO GATEHOUSE EXPANSIONM COAS.doc Page 4 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC
Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit
and Storm Management and Discharge Controls).
All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or
engineering geologist registered in the State of California.
19. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to
prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped
land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such
other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control
Plan.
20. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building, the applicant shall
provide a pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or
surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation.
The pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved
precise grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the
two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the
pad soil.
DRAINAGE
21. Stormwater handling shall conform to the approved hydrology and drainage
report for "Rancho La Quinta, TM 29457" of the underlying development and
Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an
approved manner.
22. Storm water may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback
lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the
setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The
perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped
with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7).
23. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries
and levels in any area outside the development.
P:\Reports - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\03 COAS.doc Page 5 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
24. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention
capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into
the historic drainage relief route.
25. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received
and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief
route.
UTILITIES
26. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110
(Utilities).
27. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all
utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures
including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves,
and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic
purposes.
28. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For
installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply
with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City
Engineer.
The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for
approval by the City Engineer.
LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
29. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance
requirements per guidelines in the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways
and Streets" latest edition, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping
and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-
way.
MAINTENANCE
30. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160
(Maintenance).
PAReports - PC\2012\PC_10-23.12\RLQ GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\03 COAS.doc Page 6 of 7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2012-923
RANCHO LA QUINTA GATEHOUSE EXPANSION
OCTOBER 23, 2012
31. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual
maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, and
sidewalks.
FEES AND DEPOSITS
32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180
(Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the
City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts
shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and
permits.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
33. Gate(s) shall be automatic or manual operated. Install Knox key operated
switches, with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Knox
Company.
34. The minimum dimension for gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a
minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. Any gate providing
access from a road shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway
and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road.
Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate
entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
35. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy by the City of La Quinta Building
and Safety Department, plant and shrub species within the expanded planter
area shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.
PAReporb - PC\2012\PC_10-23-12\RLO GATEHOUSE EXPANSION\03 COAS.doo Page 7 of 7
ATTA[;HMFNT A 1
44JON
a�
d�
6[ E}
03,1111
film g
a
tlF a �
z �.
I A A A� 1 li 1� pit W e
I
4
a
eL
a� wm�ym,r weu `"" ov�sn �..rva.nwn. 9n0R'fn� �I^D �o4au"
5 : 3d wo sauna as"04:6� aao+i$ o wr Y N
$t!>tl
.iP r., ( �i {i i tF {• j�a # F i
�t , .j t i?:}^ z. y �j? 3tii ' •' i tla a # #:JJ F;�i 'lFai t �: _
t#
f'' 77aii#:i iii:iit
#F •tail i r 1 # ii �f'#1} Fjtt :?F'1 }#i #? #F,i#ft F ;ii(#tIF @#z !@ sZi: g
i; iF ;ticii eS 3i :! ed iF#`iF';i$�t#,�# #i�iI
!! !# F S.€f { 77i ? '1 1'(:iii i:'�. ita i }jSfy{.i;'c 3,�F i?;!j'
�i {'iFi ti E�� cif Fi#( tIlea it 1#•i:lii' ``'#3'.I f(,i i'� !�
c1
F#!fill
?7l;,;� FiF
d 4 E ! 1 `!!t{�; #:#i #i ii ad '#ii;' p #iii t i'E#i!'
j #e F afi i iSi#a I F; F,. F ia, diid{ F,I : F 3 !fill > i{i !..#,i# „ t
'G4 41 4-% p p
19
�: i ij C � � � rr_ i !; a!!
4 $ lip
N
��t3pF
1 �_.It — f.'. c v o
� 'YY19$ ayvF`
I if
i
lit
0
it
�l If
#iIt
jai 1 F#y s F 7
i i if
I
liii 0F:9
t
3 dd j�t•a.tt �
1F? fit i
ii•a a 3a
t psi{Iif�i it I � g ., I
Noma ueIA JwIA 19WZ a13 Pue NAH a 04ftllO uw4s uooj"r
jI
i
i t'sll�lzis�i15
¢¢ CjCj f 56
tit = 11,
d i{€ yy1 E gIp 3 ifia551 tt
! t { e ! a 3 { E 5
s
i gt
1fs it
..JI
�4q t?1, lir�
E1 t;i
-,if fill
E I
€�
{ii t€j5 6
i 1;!ixiiii�±€lli�i;,fj !Et !€{;{l
3 azaE 9 �'I:l !E
iilit
�,€
IS;Ejzo
k('
€tl i {� iiltf�ii
;(i€€it€ i�€r{€iiiiEt€ iits�?
€I € I i 1!=it
,
YS ✓ M.e t '
Y64
}•
R
�ww� wxa
�+v�rw�awu
on.ww
Y-V �'PV19 -
.ww.a Iwns.x.dw'm+e.
9nl]�'Ja^fJ .14411�fl fy.s.M
� `
}}
8 8
1
g
a
vnsss
suopsv13 WV&3x3
asnoga oaaalyg uma"ar
=
>
WHS 'a SLL80B
..�.
•.
! J
i 1
i
4
1 {
I5
j
EEG
V-rl
.
•�
_
0-
`p
- g`
i Sp o
_.E-1
4 r yy
^f fo
6\
SSL l3
sitE1�pp
• 9
p!r
_-_ _s.. ♦
;i8fop£ii
{
Ryp
Y3
f
y
fli
8
.suns fY
a ; Y p' h 0
E
0
c
4
A
�i
•v.
i
4
•i
L�-
yui �_ Y4
i JYnI Jc I Oi
�e d�f
- .
. all
}
}
2
t
.
6§
\
-
}� >
3�
v C ,��
.
.
» �
\\\.\
` \ \
� \ �
|
l
11)
}
}
(
Pal
\
-
�>
.y
« !
_
\
-
u 11 in�saa ueld 13 "no4'" 9 ao949 uo�iJor i
- 3dOHS *H SI1H09 _ _ _ ^W°V ! 1 1 x 1 s
I
WHOM
�m,,M0,
2��v
ImLN
M3333
1
MINOR
aaaaa��aaa��
4
Y
}z i
�3�t %� E 23gC '23y
¢¢���• tt t 3e t Pit
x;lx 32: § si
SS g�2_ •� �yy� !E �l�S
tllnJ�€�� 3; 3 � 317t�g
e ;
EE;Jill
Ei SIM M.M.
is
Jim
u �A�? yF�? ?����#c is �•
=' _.
_r gxg ?c5a 3$35g 2{fit a€`pgY7('3
E xx3€a ZSa :,Y3Ii
0
g ` �.+e...,.'� a�n au+"o7+wmo no4 .a '
@A rn�saa aydu0o1oyd "®1191W�3 �ol� aeno4oss� avaryg uoua�a� a Qi
3anxs •a suana
1
mg
119
Im
m o
a
♦aa a ,
) �, 5
ae
a m r #
elf
. rr
6
�frm
t _
j
Ir ,
IIjyi,v t.
m ?
ATTACHMENT # 2
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE
MINUTES
MONDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2012
CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the La Quinta Architecture " " Landscaping Review
Committee was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Plan n meager David Sawyer.
Planning Manager Sawyer led the Committee in Pledge legiance.
{
PRESENT: Committee Members d Gray, Kevin e, and Ray
Rooker
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Man
and Secretary
PUBLIC COMMENT -
10101019ld6/e1
/e111J:T$IT/lw9T;
Planner Jay Wuu,
Motion "' mo as "I by Committee Members McCune/Rooker to approve
the
'itectural aan'ng Review Committee Minutes of September 13,
201 submitted. ��ion p d unanimously.
1. Consider ai � ?ySite Development Permit 2012-923 submitted by the
Master AS tion of Rancho La Quinta for the Architectural and
Landscaping flans for the Expansion of the Rancho La Quinta Jefferson
Street Gatehouse. The project is located at 49-003 Jefferson Street, within
the Rancho La Quinta Development.
Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the information contained in the staff
report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department.
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 1 OCTOBER 15, 2012
Associate Planner Wuu introduced the applicant Jerry Santucci, General
Contractor with Santucci Builders, Inc., 72-529 Beavertail Street, Palm
Desert, CA, and Curtis Richard Shupe, Architect with Curtis Richard Shupe
Design, 72-880 Fred Waring Drive, Suite A-5, Palm Desert, CA, and said
they were available to answer any questions the Committee might have.
General discussion followed regarding the project addressing the following:
• An existing traffic signal in front of the
• No parking of vehicles should occur
ample employee parking lot was pro,
community
• Removal of existing palm trees art
for a final result of having t al
guardhouse and two in the re_
• Existing surveillance and the "'tion of
• Types of surveillance equipme ng id
• There would be no change to the
• Addition of four lant , o match th
• Location of AC units h. `water he
Committee Member -I
design and th
suggested t e of
to soften pact of
match the ting a
perimeter of i x .x
gene
ing.
guardhouse as an
the gates of the
e additio ' new landscaping
m trees a #. front of the
surveilla
for the community
Rooker re ' ce, about the architectural
f vege espe on the south side. He
sses oo stone, and/or additional landscaping
stucco-U. r. Shupe replied the landscaping would
Ted ther as a five -six foot planter around the
�t,.
mooalso provide additional landscaping.
dYto comply with a condition of approval
followed regarding the existing and proposed
Motion ` ,Minutt9otion 2012-005 was made by Committee Members
RookerI�sr mending approval of Site Development Permit 2012-923
as subm! with staff's recommendations and recommending that
augmenting tl�e proposed landscaping be added as a condition of approval.
Motion passed unanimously.
CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None
COMMISSIONER ITEMS — None
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 2 OCTOBER 15, 2012
PLANNING STAFF ITEMS
• Planning Manager Sawyer said La Quinta Retirement Community project
submitted by Lenity Group, LLC. had been presented to the Planning
Commission for review and consideration on September 25, 2012. The
Commission had amended the conditions of approval recommended by staff
by requesting that the Committee's suggestions be added to the conditions
of approval. The project is scheduled to be presented to the City Council on
October 23, 2012.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was ved by
McCune/Gray to adjourn this meeting at 4:23 * Motion
Respectfully submitted,
MONIKA RADEVA, Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
Members
ously.
ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING
REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 3 OCTOBER 15, 2012
PH 2
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2012
CASE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2012-145
REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL TO ALLOW THE
TEMPORARY PLACEMENT AND USE OF FOUR (4)
TEMPORARY METAL STORAGE CONTAINERS DURING
THE 2012 HOLIDAY SEASON
LOCATION: 79-295 HIGHWAY 111 — WAL-MART
APPLICANT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PROPERTY OWNER: WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST
ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW: THE LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS
DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY
EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO
SECTION 153041E] (CLASS 4) IN THAT THE STORAGE
CONTAINERS ARE TEMPORARY AND WILL HAVE NO
EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
ZONING: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL)
SURROUNDING
ZONING/LAND USE: NORTH:
RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL)
SOUTH:
RH (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
EAST:
RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL)
WEST:
RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012- approving CUP 2012-145, based
upon the Findings contained therein and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
CUP 2012-145 Planning Commission Staff Report 10/23/12 Page 1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In August, the Planning Department issued a holiday reminder letter to all major retail
tenants referencing the permit process necessary for any business seeking to utilize
cargo containers for temporary holiday storage. To date, only Wal-Mart has applied for
a Conditional Use Permit for the use of temporary storage containers this holiday
season.
Each proposed container measures 8' feet wide, by 48' feet long, by 8.5' feet high
(Attachment 1). The outdoor storage containers will be located within a paved area at
the southwest corner of Wal-Mart's property and will be screened by a 9' foot high
chain -linked fence with an attached 9' foot high green privacy screen. The four storage
containers are located approximately ninety (90') feet from the edge of the loading
docks. The applicant has stated that the use of the containers will commence upon
approval of the Conditional Use Permit and will be removed by Christmas Day.
ANALYSIS
Public view of the temporary storage containers is limited by the surrounding built
environment and the height of the proposed screening. The property to the west is
vacant, while trees and an existing 8' foot high block wall limits views from the
adjacent Aventine Apartment complex to the south.
The location of the proposed temporary storage containers complies with the sixty
(60') foot building setback clearing area for type-V non -rated structures, as per the
Building Code.
The placement of the temporary storage containers does not affect the traffic pattern
or truck turnaround space for Wal-Mart, as more than adequate space exists between
the storage containers and the loading docks to the east.
The La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this proposal is categorically
exempt from environmental review pursuant to provisions of section 15304[E] (Class
4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as the proposed project is
temporary and will have no effect on the environment.
PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT
This public hearing was advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper on October 12, 2012.
All property owners within 500 feet of the site were mailed a copy of the public
hearing notice as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code. As of this writing, no
correspondence regarding this application has been received. Any correspondence
CUP 2012-145 Planning Commission Staff Report 10/23/12 Page 2 of 3
received following the completion of this report will be presented to the Planning
Commissioners at the hearing.
Prepared by:
U "
ANgAIEW J. MOGENSEN, AICP
Prirfcipal Planner
ATTACHMENTS
1. Site Photographs
2. Plan Set
CUP 2012-145 Planning Commission Staff Report 10/23/12 Page 3 of 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING THE USE OF
FOUR (4) TEMPORARY METAL STORAGE CONTAINERS
DURING THE 2012 HOLIDAY SEASON
CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-145
APPLICANT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did, on the 23rd day of October 2012, hold a duly noticed Public
Hearing to consider a request by Tait & Associates, Inc. to allow four
temporary outdoor metal storage containers from October 23, 2012 through
January 15, 2013, to be located on the southwest side of the existing Wal-
Mart store, for the storage of holiday merchandise at 79-295 Highway 1 1 1,
more particularly described as follows:
APN: 600-340-027
Parcel 1 of Tract Map 30420
WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit 2012-145 is consistent with
Specific Plan 97-029, as the proposed use of storage containers is temporary
and accessory to a primary use approved and authorized under the existing
Specific Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the temporary use of storage containers is categorically
exempt from environmental review pursuant to provisions of Section
15304[E) (Class 4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in
that the proposal constitutes a minor temporary use of land having no
permanent effect on the environment; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be
heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings
pursuant to Section 9.210.020 of the Zoning Code to justify approval of said
Conditional Use Permit:
1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed temporary use is
consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan in that the
property is designated Regional Commercial which is consistent with
the temporary use proposed by this application.
Planning Commission Resolution 2012-
Conditional Use Permit 2012-145
October 23, 2012
2. Consistency with the Zoning Code: The proposed temporary use is
consistent with the development standards outlined in Section
9.100.120 (Outdoor Storage and Display) of the Zoning Code because
merchandise will be stored in enclosed metal containers which have
been screened and placed away from traffic and pedestrians at the
rear of the building.
3. Compliance with CEQA: The La Quinta Planning Department has
determined that this application is categorically exempt from
environmental review pursuant to provisions of Section 15304[E]
(Class 4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The
proposal constitutes a minor temporary use of land having no
permanent effect on the environment.
4. Surrounding Uses: Approval of the Conditional Use Permit will not
create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and
general welfare or be injurious to, or incompatible with, other
properties or land uses in the vicinity in that they are temporary and
will be placed in areas away from customer and delivery traffic and
public views. The adjacent properties are designated and zoned for
commercial use within the Centre at La Quinta Shopping Center.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the Planning Commission for this Conditional Use Permit;
2. That it does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2012-145 for the
reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval;
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta Planning Commission held on this 23rd day of October, 2012, by the
following vote, to wit:
I_\'1 *-3
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Resolution 2012-
Conditional Use Permit 2012-145
October 23, 2012
ABSTAIN:
KATIE BARROWS, Chairwoman
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
LES JOHNSON
Planning Director
City of La Quinta, California
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012-
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-045 WAL-MART
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED
October 23, 2012
GENERAL
1. The use of this site shall be in conformance with the approved exhibits
contained in Conditional Use Permit 2012-145, unless otherwise amended by
the following conditions.
2. This Conditional Use Permit allows a total of four (4) temporary metal storage
containers to be located at the southwest corner of the property at 79-295
Highway 1 1 1, to be used for the storage of holiday merchandise between until
.January 15, 2012.
3. The storage containers and screening enclosure shall be removed and the site
shall be cleared of all materials and restored to its original condition no later
January 15, 2012.
4. All containers shall be kept at least 60 feet away from the building at all times.
Any storage containers or materials which are placed within the 60 foot
building clearance area or obstruct a fire access lane shall be relocated upon
notice from the Fire Marshal or Code Compliance.
5. The outdoor storage area shall be maintained and kept clean of debris at all
times. Graffiti or vandalism shall be removed or repaired within 48 hours of
notice.
6. All stored materials shall be secured within the enclosed metal storage
containers.
7. The applicant/property owner agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any
claim, or litigation arising out of the City's approval of this project. This
indemnification shall include any award toward attorney's fees. The City of La
Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion.
PH 3
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2012
CASE NO.: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2012-109
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE; SECTION 9.150, PARKING, AND SECTIONS
RELATED THERETO
LOCATION: CITY WIDE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: THE LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS EXEMPT PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 2.6, SECTION 21080 OF THE PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT STATUTES, AND SECTION 15061(B)(3), REVIEW FOR
EXEMPTIONS OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES. THE LA QUINTA
PLANNING COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER THIS
DETERMINATION, ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT, AT THE HEARING.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012 = _, recommending that the City
Council certify the environmental determination, and recommending adoption of
Amendments to the La Quinta Municipal Code; Section 9.150, Parking, and
Sections related thereto.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In June of this year, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal regarding a
proposed tandem garage for a new home in the La Quinta Cove. The Commission
did not uphold the Director's determination that a tandem garage parking
configuration was not permitted, and directed staff to revise the Code to more
definitively address tandem garage parking throughout the City.
The proposed amendments to Section 9.150, and other related Sections of the
Zoning Code. are intended to clarify when and where tandem parking is allowed.
These amendments consist of:
• Incorporation of a tandem parking definition;
• Allowance for tandem garage parking designs to satisfy minimum parking
requirements for the Cove, and as excess parking in all zoning districts; and,
• Changes to clarify residential garage dimensions for tandem parking design.
ANALYSIS:
Exhibit A of the proposed Planning Commission Resolution summarizes the
proposed changes to the Municipal Code that relate to the addition of tandem
parking allowances. The proposed changes are focused on permitting the use and
design of tandem parking to meet minimum parking requirements in the Cove
Residential (RC) zoning district, and to clarify that tandem parking arrangements
can be employed for a residential use for any parking provided above the minimum
parking requirements.
In addition to the primary revisions affecting Section 9.150, minor language
changes are needed in other Municipal Code sections related to the proposed
amendment:
• Section 9.50.090.A, relating to RC District development standards, has been
revised to specifically cite the parking standards contained in Section 9.150;
this is simply to clarify the governing Section.
• Section 9.60.060.B.1, relating to Garage and Carport setbacks, now includes a
provision that a tandem garage may not be designed as a side -entry garage
when located along a street frontage.
• Sections 9.150.040.B.1, 9.150.060 (Table 9-1 1), 9.150.080.A.3, and
9.150.080.13.11 have been revised to specify when tandem parking is permitted
and the development standards applicable to such parking. Generally, in -line
tandem parking in a garage, when proposed to meet minimum parking
requirements, is permitted only in the RC district and must be in a garage. In all
residential districts, tandem parking may be employed when parking in excess of
the minimum required parking is proposed/provided.
• Section 9.280.030, relating to Definition of Terms, has been amended to add a
tandem parking definition.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
This request was published in the Desert Sun newspaper on October 12, 2012. To
date, no comments have been received. Comments were not requested from any
2
public agencies or other City Departments, due to the narrow scope of the
amendment and perceived unlikelihood that these changes will affect any other
departments or agencies.
STATEMENT OF MANDATORY FINDINGS:
Findings to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance amendments can be
made and are contained in the attached Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2012- , recommending approval
of Zoning Code Amendment 2012-109 to the City Council.
Prepared by:
Wallace Nesbit
Principal Planner
3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2012 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2012-109; FOR
AMENDMENTS TO THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO
SECTION 9.50.090 (RC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS);
SECTION 9.60.060 (GARAGES AND CARPORTS); SPECIFIED
SECTIONS WITHIN CHAPTER 9.150 (PARKING); AND, SECTION
9.280.030 (DEFINITION OF TERMS)
CASE NO.: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2012-109
APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did on the 23rd day of October, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing
for review of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend certain Sections of the La
Quinta Municipal Code as identified by Title of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, said Zoning Ordinance Amendment has complied with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63) in that the La Quinta Planning
Department has reviewed the Amendment under the provisions of CEQA, and has
determined that the Amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(B) (3),
Review for Exemptions of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department published the public hearing
notice in the Desert Sun newspaper on October 12, 2012, as prescribed by the
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard,
said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings
recommending approval of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment, to the City Council:
1. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the General Plan, particularly Goal 2 of the
Residential Goals, Policies and Programs, in that allowing tandem parking will
facilitate a broader range of housing types, through greater flexibility in siting
units on residential lots and design options for individual homes.
2. Approval of the Zoning 'Ordinance Amendment will not create conditions
materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and will have
no impacts on the public health, safety and welfare, as the amendments do
not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of
public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety and
welfare considerations.
3. The Zoning Ordinance Amendment has been determined to be exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed changes to the
Municipal Code will have no effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the
Planning Commission in this case.
2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 2012-109, as set forth in attached Exhibit A and
titled "Final Draft Tandem Parking Amendments", to the City Council for the
reasons set forth in this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta Planning Commission, held on the 23' day of October, 2012, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
KATIE BARROWS, Chairwoman
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
LES JOHNSON, Planning Director
City of La Quinta
EXHIBIT A
FINAL RECOMMENDED TANDEM PARKING AMENDMENTS
AMEND 9.50.090.A, RC district development standards; Requirements, to add
9.50.090.A.19, as follows:
A. Requirements:
19. Parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 9.150 Table 9-11
(Parking for Residential Land Uses).
AMEND 9.60.060.B.1, Garages and carports; Setbacks, as follows:
1. In the RVL district, the minimum garage or carport setback shall be thirty feet.
In all other residential districts, the minimum setback for front -entry type
garages or carports shall be twenty-five feet if a standard "pivot" type garage
door is used, twenty feet if a "roll -up" type garage door is used, and twenty
feet for a carport. For side -entry type garages, the minimum garage setback
shall be twenty feet in the RVL district and fifteen feet in all other residential
districts. A side -entry garage designed as tandem parking, when permitted
under this code, shall not be located along any street frontage.
AMEND 9.150.040.B.1, Parking location and accessibility; Accessibility, as
follows:
1. All required off-street parking spaces shall be designed, located, constructed
and maintained so as to be fully and independently usable and accessible at all
times.
AMEND 9.150.060 Spaces required by use, as follows:
Table 9-11 Parking for Residential Land Uses
Land Use
Minimum Off -Street Parking
Requirement
Additional Requirements
Single-family detached,
single-family attached and
duplexes
2 spaces per unit in a
garage, plus 0.5 guest
spaces per unit if no on-
street parking is available.
In a garage, tandem parking
habitable that Fnay
F99Fn
be fOF
sleeping
used
kitehen, ba hFOO..
hallway, dining
F88FA, OF
living
may be used to meet the
&Vsway length
above -stated minimum
shall
required parking in the RC
9.60.060. For all single
family residential zones
district only.
except RC, parking in
excess of the minimum
required may be tandem
AMEND 9.150.080.A.3, Parking facility design standards; Parking Layout and
Circulation, as follows:
A. Parking Layout and Circulation.
3. Tandem parking shall be permitted only in mobile home parks/subdivisions,
as driveway guest parking and parking that exceeds the minimum required
for single-family detached, single-family attached and duplex residential
uses, and where valet parking is provided. In the RC residential district,
tandem parking may also be employed to meet minimum required parking
when located within a garage meeting the standards in Section
9.150.080. B.1 1.
AMEND 9.1 50.080.B. 11, Parking facility design standards; Parking Facility Design
and Dimensions, as follows:
B. Parking Facility Design and Dimensions.
11. Residential Garages. Minimum interior dimensions in residential garages
(wall-to-wall) shall be based on providing ten feet in width pefi� and
twenty feet in depth, per required vehicle parking space. (Fsr- example
two eaF gaFage shall be minimum twenty feet wade by twenty feet deep.)
This applies to design of all required garage parking spaces, whether in a
tandem parking or side -by -side configuration.
AMEND 9.280.030 Definition of terms, to add the following definitions:
Parking, tandem. "Tandem parking" means any off-street parking space(s), or
arrangement of such spaces, configured in such a manner such that one or more
spaces is not directly accessible to a street or other approved access without
traversing any portion of another space.
Tandem parking — see "Parking, tandem".
BI 1
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: LES JOHNSON, PLANNING DIRECTO
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2012
SUBJECT: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FY 2012/13 WORK PROGRAM
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with information on the key work
program items the Planning Department is currently working on or will be working on
during the current budget cycle (FY 2012/2013).
A Draft Work Plan with items the Planning Commission will be involved with has been
attached for your review. When finalized, a copy of this Work Plan will be brought
before the City Council
Staff will be prepared to provide a verbal summary of each of the listed program items
and answer any questions you may have.
We look forward to the opportunity to discuss these items with you during the meeting.
La Quinta Planning Commission
2012/13 Work Program
Philosophy
The general purpose of the Planning Commission is to carry out the powers and duties
as prescribed in the Planning and Zoning Laws of the State of California and the City of
La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, as well as the La Quinta Municipal Code and other local
ordinances.
Core objectives of the Planning Commission are:
• To serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council on identifying matters
pertaining to planning and zoning;
• To coordinate with staff on review and approval of the City's General Plan;
• To consider new development applications;
• To consider design review of new developments; and
• Development of specific plans.
ITEM
2012/13 Work Program Items
Zoning Code - General Plan Consistency Update
Parking Regulations
Parking Improvement Area in the Village Commercial District
Temporary Sign Ordinance
Permit Efficiency and Process Streamlining
PAGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 1 1 P a g e
2012/2013 Work Program Items
WORK ITEM:
Zoning Code -
General Plan Consistency Update
Parking Regulations Update
Parking Improvement Area
in the Village Commercial District
Temporary Sign Ordinance
Permit Efficiency and Process
Streamlining
OBJECTIVE:
Review and revise, as determined, the City's
Zoning Code and bring it into consistency with
the 2012 General Plan Update.
Review and revise, as determined, the City's
Parking Regulations.
Explore and consider the establishment of a
Parking Improvement District for the purpose of
providing public parking in the Village commercial
area.
Review and revise, as determined, the Temporary
Sign regulations as discussed at the March 20,
2012, Council meeting.
Review and revise, as determined, Title 9 of the
Zoning Code to facilitate a streamlined application
process for review of development permits.
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 2 I P a g e
Zoning Code - General Plan Consistency Update
Completion Date: June, 2013
Participants: Planning Commissioners
Suggested Resources: Planning staff, consultant staff, and City Clerk's office.
Steps to Completion: Staff and selected consultant staff will review the Zoning
Code, for consistency with the soon to be completed 2035
General Plan; scheduled to go before the Council in December,
2012. Proposed amendments will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission for recommendation to Council. City Clerk's
office will update and codify the La Quinta Municipal Code to
reflect the changes.
Staff Time: 120-150 hours dependent upon needed corrections and extent
of effort.
Fiscal Commitment: $25,000 included in FY 2012/13 budget. Staff and
Commission time.
Staff Role: Provide information, prepare draft amendments, and implement
changes.
Planning
Commission Role: Provide direction to staff and recommendation to City Council.
Reference: La Quinta Municipal Code Title 9.
La Quints Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 3 1 P a g e
Parking Regulations Update
Completion Date: March, 2013
Participants: Commissioners
Suggested Resources: Planning staff, Public Works staff, and City Clerk's office.
Steps to Completion: The current parking regulations were adopted in 1996. The
update will take a comprehensive look at both parking supply
and design requirements of the current regulations in
comparison to today's industry standards as well as local
community goals and needs. Planning Commission to review
and make recommendation to Council. City Clerk's office
would update Chapter 9.150 of the La Quinta Municipal Code
to reflect the changes.
Staff Time: 40 - 60 hours dependent upon amount of research needed to
compare current application versus future needs.
Fiscal Commitment: Staff and Commission time.
Staff Role: Provide information, prepare draft amendment, and implement
changes.
Planning
Commission Role: Provide direction to staff and recommendation to City Council.
Reference: La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.150.
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 4 1 P a g e
Parking Improvement Area in the Village Commercial District
Completion Date: May, 2013
Participants: Commissioners
Suggested Resources: Planning staff, Public Works staff, and City Clerk's office.
Steps to Completion: Parking in the Village Commercial District has been and
continues to be a major concern for businesses in that area.
Currently, parking regulations for various types of land uses
are primarily the same in the Village as they are throughout the
City, with an exception that within the Village District,
applicants have an option to participate in an individual parking
agreement with the City. Historically, such agreements are
negotiated on a case by case basis allowing the applicant to
pay a parking space in -lieu fee in place of providing a required
physical parking space. The challenge with this process is
maintaining a fair and equitable formula for participation due to
fluctuating costs over time. An alternative to addressing this
on a case by case basis is the establishment of a parking
improvement district where the procedures for participation
and associated benefits are established in a set formulated
manner in order to meet the goals identified in the formation of
the district. This work item is to explore and consider the
framework for the establishment of such a district and to then
receive Council direction on further action. Planning
Commission to review and make recommendation to Council.
Staff Time: 60-80 hours dependent upon amount of research needed to
compare current application versus future needs.
Fiscal Commitment: Staff and Commission time.
Staff Role: Provide information and alternatives.
Planning
Commission Role: Provide direction to staff and recommendation to City Council.
Reference: La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.150.
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 5 1 Page
Temporary Sign Ordinance
Completion Date: January, 2013
Participants: Commissioners
Suggested Resources: Planning staff and City Clerk's office.
Steps to Completion: Earlier this year, Council directed staff to implement an Interim
Sign Program allowing businesses to display merchandise and
utilize A -frame signs in front of their businesses for a period
not to exceed 12 months. Council also directed staff to look
into potential permanent adjustments to the Code in order to
provide additional signage options and opportunities for
businesses. Planning Commission to review and make
recommendation to Council. City Clerk's office will update
Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to reflect the changes.
Staff Time: 20-30 hours dependent upon research into the effectiveness of
the new signs as well as any Code Compliance issues.
Fiscal Commitment: Staff and Commission time
Staff Role: Provide information, prepare draft amendment, and implement
changes.
Planning
Commission Role: Provide direction to staff and recommendation to City Council.
Reference: La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.160.060.
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 6 1 P a g e
Permit Efficiency and Process Streamlining
Completion Date: May, 2013
Participants: Commissioners
Suggested Resources: Planning staff, Public Works staff and City Clerk's office.
Steps to Completion: As part of a City-wide effort to enhance customer service and
improve efficiency and expediency in the City's development
review and permit approval process, the Zoning Code will be
reviewed for potential changes to achieve this objective.
Proposed amendments will be presented to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation to the City
Council.
Staff Time: 40-60 hours.
Fiscal Commitment: Staff and Commission time.
Staff Role: Provide information, prepare draft amendments, and implement
changes.
Planning
Commission Role: Provide direction to staff and recommendation to City Council.
Reference: La Quinta Municipal Code Title 9.
La Quinta Planning Commission 2012/13 Work Program 7 1 P a g e