The URL can be used to link to this page

BRES2015-0208r CVOICE (760) 777-7125 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO — --0 D FAX (760) 777-7011 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS (760) 777-7153 BUILDING PERMIT Date: 8/20/2015 Application Number: BRES2015-0208 Owner: Property Address: 55487 SOUTHERN HILLS y BEH PROPERTIES LLC APN: 775200018 16817 232ND PL SE Application Description: PGA/HAMILTON/3429 SQ FT SFD MONROE, WA 96272 ` Property Zoning: Application Valuation: $320,429.70 Applicant: Contractor: MARK HOWARD BEH PROPERTIES LLC 16817 232ND PL SE MONROE, WA 96272 Llc. No.: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am I' nsed rider provisi ns of Chapter I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 o the.8 Hess and P f ssions Code, I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' and my License is in full force and effect. compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the'performance License Class_: Li rise No.: _ of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by te: Contractor: Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit V. is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: ka : OWNER-BUILDE D CLARATION Carrier: _ Policy Number: - I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractor's State _ I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' city or county that requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair compensation laws of California, and agree tha i I should become subject to the any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for the permit to file a workers' compe sation rovisions of Section 3 00 the Labor Code" shall forthwith signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the co ply it se pro isions. Contractor's State License Law (Chapter9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and theDate: Applicant: basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any, applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars w.XRN11N ,: FAILU E TO SECURE WORKER COMPENSATIO COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, ($500).: AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO (_) I, as owner of the property, or my.employees with wages as their sole ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000). IN ADDITION TO THE COST. OF compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. w apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does the work - himself or herself through his or her own employees, provided that the improvements APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold IMPORTANT: Application is hereby made to the Building Official for a permit subject to within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that the conditions and restrictions set forth on this application. he or she did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 1.. Each person upon whose behalf this application is made, each person at whose (_) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors request and for whose benefit work is performed under or pursuant to any permit to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' issued as a result of this application , the owner, and the applicant, each agrees to, and State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta, its officers, agents, and thereon, and who contracts for the projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to employees for any act or omission related to the work being performed under or the Contractors' State License Law.). following issuance of this permit. (� I am exempt under Sec. . B.&P.C. for this reason 2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject permit to cancellation. Date:' Owner: CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ. C.). Lender's Name: Lender's Address: I certify that I have read this application and state that the ab94e information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and st a laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives ofthisAtoterupon the ve• mentioned pr perty or inspection purposes. Dat Signature (Applicant or Agent . 9 FINANCIAL INFORMATION '° AMOUNT '' x ;PAID' ^� .PAID DATE t M F $ r,DESCRIPTION ' ? 'r ""ACC.OUNT.; • s`, ,QTY ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - RESIDENTIAL 270-0000-43201 0 $301.07 $0.00 "PAID BY,,r• ,>:p U 4 ' '„"METHOD ? �" t 'RECEIPT #b ;- a CHECK #f" �. F, CLTD BY Total Paid forART IN PUBLIC PLACES - AIPP: $301:07. $0.00 t A DESCRIPTION n + k.. .r'. =ACCOUNT ' ' + >� , w. �N. QTY AMOUNT ` r. PAID PAID DATE. BSAS SB1473 FEE 101-0000-20306 0 $13.00 $0.00 ' PAID BY ; ; METHOD Y . ',RECEIPT # $°. 'CHECK # w ` CLTD BY.'- Total Paid forBUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION BSA $13.00 $0.00 DESCRIPTION �. _5 r ; •s �� ACCOUNT .r .:' :, ': .-QTYv-1-AMOUNT, 'r r PAID .I, PAID DATE DIF - CIVIC CENTER 252-0000-43200 0 $942.00 $0.00 PAID BY uYt y.. METHOD . RECEIPT# _. 5 " CHECK# °,;, r CLTD BYi °!'x� DESCRIP_TION "' " r` ACCOUNT QTY 'AMOUNT��tt , ;_: f PAID-�� ..x,ye PAID DATE: DIF - COMMUNITY CENTERS 254-0000-43200 0 $129.00 $0.00 4 _PAID,BY `�" ! ^; 'METHOD RECEIPT# "�: CHECKr# ^ ; ::CLTD BY �+°`"'DESCRIPTION 5'`ACCOUNT",` QTY. "•` •AMOUNT• ' « •PAID `' PAID DATE DIF - FIRE PROTECTION 257-0000-43200 0 $433.00 $0.00 , s' -,PAID .BY j"` k- ;•' vMETHOD' 'RECEIPT# t "' • , CHECK# CLTD:BY - DESCRIPTION- a= 'a x ` ACCOUNT;* a QTY �AMO•UNT PAID'`µ{� : -{ PAID DATE DIF - LIBRARIES 253-0000-43200 0 $344.00 $0.00 ` 11 •' rPA1D BY METHOD " "`"'` tf ' RECEIPT # CHECK ` CLTD BY.,� r -- x ".DESCRIPTION �. ACCOUNT; `,• QTY, ''+" AMOUNT`�`x=Y � �=x. PAID' ".k . PAID.DATE DIF - PARK MAINTENANCE 256-0000-43200 0 $40.00 $0.00 PAIDLBYr t' `s METHOD -s�RECEIP.T#t ar CHECK# r.CLTDBY' sfi DESCRIPTION'' *"� ` .tACCOUNT y' ,k ,:QTY is AMOUNTt 'Y : PAID, PAID DATE DIF - PARKS/REC 251-0000-43200 0 $2,048.00 $0.00 ¢ PAID BY' •s= Vii. + ._4r '- h� .RECEIPT# '' CHECK#Ft'` ��CLTDBY�4"`, W DESCRIP.TION ,' ` f,' ; `-"•" 'ACCOUNT moi' QTY '3 'AMOUNT �=` r PAID , �=' PAID DATE DIF - STREET MAINTENANCE 255-0000-43200 0 ' $116.00 $0.00 x';;;` , -'PAID BY,: s •e": , n � `'r METHOD '? ' d ' 'r �„`� RECEIP,T•# CHECK #� % ZCLTD BY .� DESCRIPTION ° ' 7 �E ACCOUNT l s QTY q '' , AMOUNT �^ ;�> PAID �, � y PAID DATE DIF -TRANSPORTATION 250-0000-43200 0 $2,842.00 $0.00 PAID BY ` . f '-'METHOD r r -RECEIPT # k y,t CHECK # . >; :. r CLTD BY:, Total Paid forDlF - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING: $6,894.00 $0.00 i� " ACCOUNT.'' ` AMOUNT. ro PAID"r PAID DATE, ,'DESCRIPTION _QTY TEMP POWER SERVICE 101-0000-42403 0 $24.17 $0.00 >,4PAID BYr :"-,,METHOD METHOD x-= " + RECEIPT,# CHECK.# Y. CCTD,:BY , l : < x � 11 x �. n.'•' DESCRIPTION' rFw,�ts ;e;ACCOUNTx+ ;QTY ;AMOUNT;,,, ° :'-' 'PAID:' PAID DATE z^ r TEMP POWER SERVICE PC 101-0000-42403 0 $16.92 $0.00 "PAID. BY METHOD RECEIPT:# ; CHECK#;5. CLTD BY ` Total Paid for ELECTRICAL: $41.09 $0.00 } DESCRIPTIONS^� °� a,� ACCOUNTa . QTY;+AMOUNT At PAID DATE • 7 RESIDENTIAL, EA ADDITION 1,000SF 101-0000-42403 0 $49.32 $0.00 PAID-BYtt'-u } ' METHOD q " ` Ns c3 RECEIPT # t`K y CHECK # .''' k.CLTD BY.`,' K= ,`.,' ,' M?s DESCRIPTION: :, - a...� ACCOUNT - _ tiCITY- w AMOUNT. -;.°" `• PAID "` PAID;DATE RESIDENTIAL, EA ADDITION 1,000SF, PC 101-0000-42600 0 $20.32 $0.00 s PAID BY, } : Y ' METHOD A ' RECEIPT# CHECK:# CLTD-BY ' T L-R k " 1 �, i aDESCRIPTION i " '.; A00OUNT. QTY r " AMOUNT ' "^ PAID.. �i PAID DATE „�' r. , � . _14 RESIDENTIAL, FIRST 1,000SF 101-0000-42403 0 $145.03 $0.00 METHOD RECEIPT # CHECK # �S' CLTD BY: f k.,. < ` DESCRIPTION °y rt S"A00OUNT QTY; ' AMOUNT' 'PAID DATE RESIDENTIAL, FIRST 1,OOOSF, PC 101-0000-42600 0 $47.86 $0.00 Ail PA66Y� " ° * METHOD "' :RECEIPT # ER.i'. CHECK`# CLTD:BY'w Total Paid for ELECTRICAL - NEW CONSTRUCTION: $262.53 $0.00 y° DESCRIPTION^;;': " r ; *e'°ACCO.UNT x^ QTY AMOUNT "� "' PAID.' PAID.DATE: .` RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING - CUSTOM 101-0000-42408 0 $36.26 $0.00 HOME LOT>7KSF PAID BY t � i i,` >w METHOD 7"' `� a "_ ; RECEIPT #., CHECK # :3 CLTD.BY-, ^ .,. t; Tz ` s DESCRIPTION " " " :;,'ACCOUNT CITY ;`+= AMOUNT,' PAID'PAID DATE. .fro .. RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING - CUSTOM 101-0000-42600 0 $181.29 $0.00 HOME LOT>7KSF PC 'PAID BY .. i`..' g �,' METHOD'r x °-.. RECEIPT#;., a;' #iA. CLTD46Yi'' ,..L x , _ , c'` . ,CHECK c Total Paid forGRADING: $217.55 $0.00 DESCRIPTIONa s.°ACCOUNT CITY ' ' : AMOUNT.;S; PAID, - PAID DATE CONDENSER/COMPRESSOR 101-0000=42402 0 $72.52 $0.00 PAID BY"". �-RE _CEIP T #,I('� C H E C K # 'Ar v CLTD, By,� , X _-A CCOUN OU NT PAID,� PAID:DATE, CON DENSER/CO M PRESSOR PC 101-0000-42600 0 $48.34 $0.00 Y, "PAID B,,:,, :�METHC )D �4',,,�`CHECK .�4CL B DgSdlkii�64��' J CITY AMOUN Tll� j, PAI 6 1;� 1' 11 t, 'I I '.. . -f' 404i D "' EXHAUST HOOD 101-0000-42402 0 $12.09 $0.00 PAID By;�:mq f T E _OD ECEIPT.'#';*,,, R 4, 4-.`ACHECK CLTD B 15HCRIO�'10k"�' QTY, OU NT, 'PAID DATE,1 EXHAUST HOOD PC 101-0000-42600 0 $4.83 $0.00 7- cPAIJ -BY-,q,, 4 D J4� z,,RECEI �,j � 4�.' - -�� By' DESCRIPTION,.,;, zf ACCOLYNT.'v' :e AMO NT ,'�PAID P AID�DATE' FURNACE 101-0000-42402 0 $72.52 $0.00 PAID BY. .;v RECEIPT-#' CHECK Cc, -jCLTD BY.: -'DESCRIPTIO N J� "ACI AM Tz" z "PAID �PAID DATE FURNACEPC 101-0000-42600 0 $48.34 $0'.00 PAID BY." i7 �4:"" '11— 1 �METH OD �iCEI �T D BY!1�1 .,4 DEStlilk ':AC LINT" 'Y� J�'AM OLIN PAI D;:j PAID DATE: VENT FAN 101-0000-42402 01 $48.36 $0.00 P4i'6 'BY 4, WET HOD ::y ` ;.,CHECK # Y, DESCRIPTION A -C C 6 CN f-, Qti; PAID DATEr VENT FAN PC 101-0000-42600 0 $19.32 $0.00 PAID BYr--' !�WE HOD —"�-RECEIPT4 ",CHEC K CLTD BY-,.. Total Paid forMECHANICAL: $326.32 $0.00 1�,DE C I ON 2P, . WIT!_ , , ;t�, , , .... CCOUNT'�'1, A MOUNT, 'PAIDr" PAID DATEi MULTI -SPECIES RESIDENTIAL 0-8 UNITS 2015 UPDATE 101-0000-20310 0 $1,301.00 $0.00 Y MET Oil RECEIPTI#P" ECK CLTD BY Total Paid forMULTI-SPECIES RESIDENTIAL $1,301.00 $0.00 DESCRIPTI 'AA , �'L- �h � -,; At C '. QTY�"4' MOUNT iPAID 114 i;PAID,DATE' NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 101-0000-42400 0 $649.33 $0.00 PAID, 5ECE'PT,#�� C ECK H C LTD.,SY, Total Paid for NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: $649.33 $0.00 ACCOUNT V ;QTY �" AMOUNT �'. ,� PAID, - =� PAID DATE NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK 101-0000-42600 0 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 5/28/15 PAID'BYE �� a! { ` *Y2"•METHODw `� ' "Y - RECEIPT. #,r x ;CHECK#.X` CLTD BY, .+ . .,ter ' , BEH PROPERTIES LLC CHECK R6465 1158 SKH u Z ,DESCRIPTION -a , z `s� i , `i4CCOUNT a w'" CITY c AMOUNT ' ` PAID..' PAID DATE! NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK 101-0000-42600 0 $182.52 $0.00 METHOD .. t i �� RECEIPT#rrt �` ",CHECK # h i!i 9 CLT6BY _. t . _ . 3 ' 1$., Total Paid for NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK: • $1,382.52 $1,200.00 'DESCRIPTION-" ` ;ACCOUNT ` ; QTY '�� : AMOUNT• _`� ' PAID r PAID`DATE .: BACKFLOW DEVICE 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 u PAID.BY'METHOD r ° 4 - RECEIPT # CC F `CHECK:# ` ' ' CLT.D BY.,• / r -. LY,'. >. �.' DESCRIPTION '.r. `i4 ;� r.. c,'AC000NT QTY AMOUNT ,; PAID ��. PAID DATE �"� BACKFLOW DEVICE PC 101-0000-42600 0 $4.83 $0.00 t' , ' .�7�PAIDBY' ;• ` 5„ .'• M t < CLTDZY.`CECETO; DESCRIPTION c:' r ACCOUNT * CfTY _` AMOUNTS? PAID .x+ '-P ID DATE ,, BUILDING SEWER 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 „r E,� PAID BY.'• .; METHOD. RECEIPT,#..;CHECK • # T `* CLTD-BY', :. 'DESCRIPTION.` �� ACCOUNT ^, ` .QTY :';<� AMOUNT ,'- ,` '" PAID;, ''�!'PAID-DATE =' . BUILDING SEWER PC 101-0000-42600 0 $12.09 $0.00 ,K , vPAID BY T,y METHOD ;F -� ° :,` RECEIPT t .4 r CHECK#,,. CLTD.BY ;: . ;DESCRIPTION`'' 'ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT_` PAID�;1 PAID'DATE• �* FIXTURE/TRAP 101-0000-42401 0 $193.44 $0.00 ID'BY " ``'� t.. 'r� tt: * 'METHOD .- J " ' = 'RECEIPT# " f 'CHECK# t CLTD 6Y= r r r DESCRIPTION �� k .} ACCOUNT QTY }AMOUNT.' `e" p' 7PAID.' ' t 'PAID DATE its , FIXTURE/TRAP PC 101-0000-42600 0 $193.44 $0.00 BY. '.�'' : "'r '" �4:METHOD''' F,'' �_ RECEIPT#r'r4�,'.:v ;'„.;CHECK#;��,•,{;,>yCLTD,BY"", .<*PAID .DESCRIPTION k "ACCQUNT `, �' QTY AMOUNTS t r 'RAIDd;`. PAID,IDATE, y GAS SYSTEM, 5+ OUTLETS 101-0000-42401 0 $36.26' $0.00 w ',= PAID BY • r , : j1 y� METHOD '"`� r r�+"11 RECEIPT•#CHECK #} CLTD.BY.:•. , ,: a 3 DESCRIPTION 1 'ACCOUNT "" AMOUNT”` ;,,,:,� *''PAI PAID DATE ,'ry .QTYx GAS SYSTEM, 5+ OUTLETS PC 101-0000-42600 0 $24.17 $0.00 iPAID BY,rMETHOD- RECEIPT# ,,Y '1 " `CLTD BY '. ys� �,-"'CHECK' "' " -. }`; *'ACCOUNT �` ` 4TY FAMOLINT . f' r +^PAID T s'h PAID DATE` „DESCRIPTION , ROOF DRAIN 101-0000-42401 0 $265.98 $0.00 IVIEII�O RIECEIP `CHECK# D-BY�- AC COUN� AMOUNT, PAID -RESCRI06 ROOF DRAIN PC 101-0000-42600 0 $265.98 $0.0.0 'PAID BV"' V,� 4 - I �4 E EIPT, C -XHECK v- CLTb,BY'-. L DESCRIPTION v CITY A.1 D,-V.�,-I, 4 6�b ATE 'P 1 yTat WATER HEATER/VENT 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 BY} RECEIPT CHECK # C C BY ;PAID :,�-METHOD,.,,-, 1CIL�� DESCRIPTION 7,` ` - Z I 'AC "�,k J4. CO.U� PAID s,"Tii�, DATE +i,�f _PAID WATER HEATER/VENT PC 101-0000-42600 0 $7.25 $0.00 4.. 41 ��PA ID METHOD-, RECEIPT # CHE LTD -BY,--- DESCR_IPTION 07 ;ACCOUNT... i QTY, AMOUNTS; J,PAID'DATE -�PAID�� x WATER SYSTEM INST/ALT/REP .101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 .METHOD ,_,!ki 4,,RECEIP ,CHE `. D� BY` c. A ,.. 'DESCRIPTION �' AC 66UNT`�' QTY.: AMOUNT'~" PAID FPAID.DATE WATER SYSTEM INST/ALT/REP PC 101-0000-42600 0 $12.09 $0.00 PAID -BY:',T METHOD RECEIPi#`"` CHECKA ;'�` :% CLTD Total Paid for PLUMBING FEES: $1,063.89 $0.00 DESCRIPTION;,1 ACCOUNT N PAID D DATE -1, -1. i r SMI - RESIDENTIAL 101-0000-20308 0 $41.66 $0.00 PAID:BY 3U if 4 Z�1, METHOD, - # CHECK.#4N-" i CLTD BY, �RECEIPT Total Paid forSTRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION SMV $41.66 $0.00 }:DESCRIPTION ,.,��ACCOUNT,,p,:` ',9TY,,,` AMOUNT':,",`-, P IDDATE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 224-0000-20320 0 $1,837.44 $0.00 ' "PAID BY ",METHOD '0 RECEIRT4 CHECK #`, C LT. D:BYE Total Paid forTUMF - RESIDENTIAL: $1,837.44 $0.00 TOTALS: $14,331.40 $1,200.00 Description: PGA/HAMILTON/3429 SQ FT SFD Type: BUILDING, RESIDENTIAL Subtype: DWELLING - SINGLE Status: APPROVED Applied: 5/27/2015 SKH FAMILY DETACHED Approved: 8/18/2015*JJO Parcel No: 775200018 Site Address: 55487 SOUTHERN HILLS LA QUINTACA 92253 - Subdivision: PM 28805 Block: Lot: 1 issued: Lot Sq Ft: 0 -Building Sq Ft: 0 - Zoning: Finaled: Valuation: $320,429.70 Occupancy Type: Construction Type: Expired: No.Buildings: 0 No. Stories: 0 No. Unites: 0 pplied&)"Approvedt" etails: NEW 3340 SQ. FT. SFD .-THIS PERMIT DOES NOT INCLUDE POOL, SPA, BLOCK WALLS, DRIVEWAY APPROACH, BBQ, -FIRE PIT OR WATER FEATURE. HOME IS FIRE SPRINKLED PER 2013 CRC CODES. Printed: Thursday, August 2,0, 2015 1:01:33 PM 1 of 6 CRWSYSTEMS 83 IP ADDITIONAL SITES CHRONOLOGY pplied&)"Approvedt" lk STAF�NAMEI Printed: Thursday, August 2,0, 2015 1:01:33 PM 1 of 6 CRWSYSTEMS ADDITIONAL SITES CHRONOLOGY 141 ijk6N&6GYTYPE' -� t� lk STAF�NAMEI ION DATE ' ':�u COMPLETION E NOTE JIM JOHNSON 6/11/2015 6/18/2015 NOTE JIM JOHNSON 8/13/2015 8/18/2015 PLAN CHECK COMMENTS FROM CONSULTANT JIM JOHNSON 6/18/2015 6/17/2015 RECEIVED PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - FROM CONSULTANT PHILIP JUAREZ 8/17/2015 8/17/2015 APPROVED 08/17/2015 YOUNG RECEIVED PLAN CHECK PICKED UP STEPHANIE KHATAMI 6/18/2015 6/18/2015 PLAN CHECK PICKED UP BY MIKE PLAN CHECK SENT TO KAY HENSEL -7/24/2015 7/24/2015 STRUC TO YOUNG - DUE 8/7/2015 OUTSIDE PC PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL STEPHANIE KHATAMI 5j27/2615 5/27/2015 RECEIVED Printed: Thursday, August 2,0, 2015 1:01:33 PM 1 of 6 CRWSYSTEMS RESUBMITTAL KAY HENSEL FINANCIAL 7/24/2015 8/7/2015 LTD CALLED MARK HOWARD TO INFORM THAT THE PLANS ARE TELEPHONE CALL JIM JOHNSON 6/18/2015 6/18/2015 ART !N PUBLIC PLACES - 270-0000-43201 0 READY FOR CORRECTIONS $0.00 RESIDENTIAL CALLED MARK TO INFORM HIM PL ANSARE READY TO ISSUE TELEPHONE CALL Total Paid forART IN PUBLIC PLACES - AIPP: JIM JOHNSON $0.00 8/19/201S BSAS SB1473 FEE 8/19/2015 0 m m $0.00 NEED SCHOOL FEE LETTER STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION' CONDITIONS 6NDITION',, DATE.-. DATE 4NOTESIt, READY TO ISSUE DIF - CIVIC CE NTER 252-0000-43260 0 $942.00 8/13/2015 PENDING CHECKLIST DIF - COMMUNITY CONTACTS bb 0 $129.00 $0.00 APPLICANT MARK HOWARD - howmark22@aol.com CONTRACTOR BEH PROPERTIES LLC 16817 232ND PL SE MONROE WA 96272 UWNtK BEH PROPERTIES LLC 16817 232ND PL SE MONROE WA 96272 $0.00 ` _' Printed: Thursday, AugustDlZO151�133nN 2nfhCRWIYSTEMS FINANCIAL INFORMATION LTD DATE -1c ART !N PUBLIC PLACES - 270-0000-43201 0 $301.07 $0.00 RESIDENTIAL Total Paid forART IN PUBLIC PLACES - AIPP: $301.07 $0.00 BSAS SB1473 FEE 101-0000-20306 0 $13.00 $0.00 Total Paid for BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION' DIF - CIVIC CE NTER 252-0000-43260 0 $942.00 $0.00 DIF - COMMUNITY 2S4-0000-43200". 0 $129.00 $0.00 CENTERS - DIF - FIRE PROTECTION 257-0000-43200 0 $433.00 $0.00 ` _' Printed: Thursday, AugustDlZO151�133nN 2nfhCRWIYSTEMS � DESCRIPTION �i-T. D AID' (41 METHOD". DIF - LIBRARIES 2S3-0000-43200 0 $344.bO $0.00 DIF - PARK 256-0000-43200 0 $40.00 $0.00 MAINTENANCE DIF - STREET - 2SS-0000-43200 0 $116.00 $0.,00 MAINTENANCE DIF - TRANSPORTATION 250-0000-43200 0 $2,842.00 $0.00 - Total Paid forDIF -'SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING $6,894.00 $0.00 TEMP POWER SERVICE 101-0000-42403 0. $24.17 $0.00 TEMP POWER SERVICE iOl-0000-42403 0 $16.92 $0.00 PC Total Paid forELECTRICAL: -$41.69 $0.00 RESIDENTIAL, EA 101-0000-42403 0 $49.32 $0.00 ADDITION 1,OOOSF RESIDENTIAL; EA 101-0000-42600 0 $20.32 $0.0o ADDITION 1,OOOSF, PC RESIDENTIAL, FIRST 101-0000-42403 0 $14S.03 $0.00 RESIDENTIAL, FIRS 101-0000-42600 I - 07 $47. 86 $0.00 F 1,000SF, PC Total Paid for ELECTRICAL - NEW CONSTRUCTION: $262.53 $0.00 RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING -CUSTOM 101-0000-42408 0 $36.26 $0.00 HOME LOT >7KSF RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING - CUSTOM 101-0000-42600 0 $181.29 $0.00 HOME LOT >7KSF PC Printed: Thursday, A-~—'--'------- PM --'- CB08WIn,ow ' u ` , Printed: Thursday, August D0,ZOz51lD:33PN 4cf6 CRWYSTEMS "A M 774 7 77 CjTY CHECK 101-0000-42402 0 $72.52 $0.00 SOR CONDENSER/COMPRES 101-0000-42600 0 $48.34 $0.00 SOR PC EXHAUST HOOD 101-0000-42402 iXHAUST H006 PC 10'1-0000-42600 0 $4.83 $0.00 FURNACE 101-0000-42402 0 $72.52 $0.00 FURNACE PC 101-0000-42600 0 $48.34 $0.00 VENTFAN 101-0000-42402 0 $48.36 $0.00 VENT FAN PC 101-0000-42600 $19.32 $0.00 Total Paid forMECHANICAL: $326.32 $0.00 RESIDENTIAL 0- 8 UNITS 101-0000-20310 0 $1,301.00 $0.00 2015 UPDATE Total Paid forMULTI-SPECIES RESIDENTIAL $1,301.00 $0.00 NEW CONSTRUCTION 101-0000-42400 0 $649.33 $0.00 PERMIT Total Paid for NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: $649.33 $0.00. NEW CONSTRUCTION 101-0000-42600 0 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 -S/28/15 R6465 - 1158, CHECK, BEH PROPERTIES LLC' SKH PLAN CHECK NEW CONSTRUCTION 101-0000-42600 0* $182.52 $0.00 PLAN CHECK Total Paid forNEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK: $1,382.S2 $1,200.00 BACKF LOW DEVICE 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 BACKFLOW DEVICE PC 101-0000-42600 .0 $4.83 $0.00 BUILDING SEWER 101-0000-42401 0 $12'.b9 $0 00 BUILDING SEWER PC 101-0000-42600 0 $12.09 �000 , Printed: Thursday, August D0,ZOz51lD:33PN 4cf6 CRWYSTEMS 777 1 - .!�i . 4�_� — -- 't 7777 _7T� 0�. -."_L'.' 'CLTD' �DESCRIPTIOW' CCOUNT -A MOUNT�,�.� 'PAI'D D DATE RECEIPT#. - METHOD;� .-'A*�-OAID BY, BY FIXTURE/TRAP 101-0000-42401 0 $193.44 $0.00 FIXTURE/TRAP PC 101-0000-42600 0 $193.44 $0.00 GAS SYSTEM, S+ 101-0000-42401 0 $36.26 '$0.00 OUTLETS GAS SYSTEM, S+ 101-0000-42600 0 $b.00 OUTLETS PC ROOF DRAIN 101-0000-42401 0 $265.98 $0.00 ROOF DRAIN PC 101-0000-42600 0 $265.98 $0.00 WATER HEATER/VENT 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 WATER HEATER/VENT 101-0000-42600 '0 $7.25 $0.00 PC WATER SYSTEM 101-0000-42401 0 $12.09 $0.00 INST/ALT/REP WATER SYSTEM - 101-0000-42600 0 $12.09 so.00 INST/ALT/REP PC I Total Paid forPLUMBING FEES: $1,063.89 $0.00 SMI -RESIDENTIAL 101-0000-20308 0 $41.66 $0.06 Total Paid forSTRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION SMI: $41.66 $0.00 SINGLE FAMILY 1 224-0000-20320 0 $1,837.44 $0.00 DETACHED Total Paid forTUMF - RESIDENTIAL: $1,837.44 $0.00 TOTALS: $14,331.40 $1,200.00 Printed: Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:01:33 PM 5 of 6 CRWYSTEMS BOND INFORMATION XT -V 'E Z: 7 -R UR REVIEWS kiVIi iY -E.- I .�SENTDATE -4=EDATEJ, DOC 15/12/2015 JIM JOHNSON 55-487 SOUTHERN 55-487 SOUTHERN D HILLS.docx NON-STRUCTURAL - BUILDING .5/27/2015 6/17/2015 6/11/2015 REVISIONS REQUIRED SCHOOL FEES 2015- SCHOOL FEES 2015- 3 WK BUCKET DOC 8/13/2015 JIM JOHNSON 0 YOUNG 5/27/2015. 6/17/2015 6/17/2015 REVISIONS REQUIRED STRUCTURAL - 2 WK 2ND REVIEW - NEW CITY TRANSMITTAL DOC 8/17/2015 ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL BRES 2015-0208 0 LISA7/6/2015 (2nd).pdf . READY FOR APPROVAL LAQ-15-RS-116 LAQ-15-RS-116 7/20/2015 7/9/2015 7/9/2015 LISA NOTTINGHAM HAMILTON FIRE NOTTINGHA -0 CONDITION SPRINKLER.docx SPRINKLER.docx M NON-STRUCTURAL- JIM JOHNSON 7/24/2015 8/7/2015 8/13/2015 APPROVED 2 W KATHRYN - NO CALC BOOKS FROM THE FIRST SUBMITTAL WERE RESUBMITTED. PER THE KATHRYN APPLICANT, WHO TALKED WITH GOUVIS ENG., STRUCTURAL - 2 WK 7/24/2015 8/7/2015 8/17/2015 READY FOR APPROVAL SAMUELS THE BOOK I SENT YOU SHOULD BE CURRENT & ACCURATE. HOPE THIS DOESN'T CAUSE ANY PROBLEMS. KAY BOND INFORMATION &K EA T 'E ATTACHMENTS T DOC 15/12/2015 JIM JOHNSON 55-487 SOUTHERN 55-487 SOUTHERN HILLS.docx HILLS.docx SCHOOL FEES 2015- SCHOOL FEES 2015- DOC 8/13/2015 JIM JOHNSON 0 0208.pdf 0208.pdf 2ND REVIEW - NEW CITY TRANSMITTAL DOC 8/17/2015 KATHRYN SAMUELS STRUCTURAL BRES 2015-0208 0 TRANSMITTAL (2nd).pdf LAQ-15-RS-116 LAQ-15-RS-116 DOC 7/9/2015 LISA NOTTINGHAM HAMILTON HAMILTON, -0 SPRINKLER.docx SPRINKLER.docx Printed: Thursday, August 20, 20151:01:33 PM 6 of 6 cmwsysrEms Y--., ..�.. - � -,�•-r^.-r. z. ._ ��..`-., ,t �;� �i X' � �,:�'Y�� ,�� ... "�-�:�r�n`�7�! �'r"Fr: 5.j..J�;f_� , ��(f ..9.� f t.. ,:i��` _ RD� P.O. BOX 1504! APPLICATION ONLY Building5 C S 9 >-;I f — r�r" )LA 11QUINTACCCALIFORNIA 02253 Address Owner _ �� E• t Cc BUILDING: TYPE CONST. OCC. GRP. Mailing -? -� e— Address '' 1 '� {� iJ tJ �� A.P. Number' ' I City Zip Tel. Legal Description J r �� 922 � a /�/r ? ;'? �i�% % Contractor , Project Description Address City Zip Tel.`t .�l�: fL y A Ly State Lic. City Sq. Ft. No. No. Dw. & Classif. Lic. # Size Stories Units Arch., Engr., New O� Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Designer Address Tel. City Zip State Lic. # LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. r SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION Estimated Valuation hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter,improve,demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for PERMIT AMOUNT such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contrac- tor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any Plan Chk. Dep. violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). Plan Chk, Bal, r 01, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, avid the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Profes- Const. sions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not appy to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that Mech. such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. I!, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did Electrical not build or improve for the purpose of sale). e, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the Plumbing 'project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply S. M. 1. to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) 1� Grading 0 am exempt under Sec.B. & P.C. for this reason 44 Driveway Enc. •�.. Date Owner•=-' �. Infrastructure WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company ❑ Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM TOTAL M W WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation CONTACT INFORMATION or less). I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ NAME: any person in any manner so as to become subject to Workers' Compensation Laws of California. PHONE: Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT. If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Name Lender's Address This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant N `r Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Date Permit IValidated by: Validation: YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = FINANCE Coachella Valle Vnif ed School District' Valley This Box For District Use Only :,83-733 Avenue 55;:Thermal; CA 92274 DEVELOPER FEES PAID . _(760)-398-5909 — Fax (760) 398-1224 AREA: _ AMOUNT ., - LEVEL ONE AMOUNT: : - :LEVEL TWO AMOUNTi - :MITIGATION AMOUNT: .COMM/IND:AMOUNT: .s DATE: .• .RECEIPT: CHECK: #:' " - INITIALS. ' ` • CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - California Education Code 1.7620) Project'Naine Bruce Hamilton ` ,.. Date-. August 19, 2015 Owner's Name:. : Bruce Hamilton Phone No. :760-272-4691 Project Address: 55-487 Southern Hills,•La'Quinta • Project Description: New SFD — InTGA West — Sunrise Agreeiinerit APN: 775-200-018 Tract #: Lot #'s Type of Development::'.: Residential . XX! ?:: "Commercial Industrial: .: Total: Square FeetofBuilding Area. ...3340: Ceetification.of Applicant/Owners: Theperson signing certifies" that the above information is correct and make's this'statement under penalty ofperjury and further represents that he/she'is.authorizedto gn on behalf 'of the owner/developer:: Dated: August 19; 2015. Signature:..- .. SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS: FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT HAVE BEEN :OR WILL BE SATISFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:. (CIRCLEONE) • Education Code - Gov.tode •; Project. _ Agreement ExistingNot Subject to Fee 17620 65995 Approval Prior to 1%1/87 Requirement Number of Sq.Ft. - -3340 -Pursuant to AB:181: room additions. or closures of 500 . sq: ft. or less are exempt from developer fees.'„Any mobile Amount.per Sq.Ft. homes being. relocated within the same school. district's: Amount Collected $628.00' jurisdiction are_ exempt from "developer fees. Fee per 1986 Sunrise Agreement. .. .. ... ..: Building Permit Application Completed: Yes/No, : By: -:Elsa -F. Esqueda, Director of. Facilities and Maintenance Certificate issued by Laurie Howard, Secretary Signature: -(Ll NOTICE OF 90 DAY•PERIOD FOR PROTEST .OF FEES AND. STATEMENT OF FEES ' Section 66020 of the Government Code asserted by Assembly Bill 3081; effectiveJanuary 1, 1997, requi "res that'this District provide'(1) a'written notice to' the project appellant, at the time of payment of school fees, mitigation payment or other exactions ("Fees"), of the 90 -day period to protest the imposition of these Fees and.(2) the. amount of the fees.:.Therrefore, in accordance with section 66020 of the Government code and other applicable law, this Notice, shall serve to advise you that the 90 -day protest period in regard to such Fees or the validity thereof, commences, with the payment of the fees or performance of any other requirements as described in: section 66020 of the Government code. Additionally, the amount of the fees imposed is as herein set forth, whether payable at_this time or in whole or in: part prior to issuance of a: Certificate of Occupancy: -MIn the latter, the 90'days:starts on the date"hereof.•'This Certificate of Compliance is valid for thirty (30) days from the date'of issuance. Extension will be granted only for good cause, as determined by the School District, and up to three (3)'such: extensions may be granted.'; MV:c/mydocs/devfees/certificate.of compliance fonn.updated 3-2007 11/2010 .. `r Tide 365 DOC # 2014-0267602 07/18/2014 11:25 AM Fees: $24.00 Page .1 of 4 Doc T Tax Paid . RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Recorded in Official Records Title 365 County of Riverside AND WHEN RECORDED MAILLarry W. Ward Assessor, Assessor, County Clerk & Recorder' BEH Properties;:LLC 16817 232nd Place SE Monroe,.WA - 982.72 ""This document was electronically submitted to the County of Riverside'for recording" Order No.: 510.1300841.51 Receipted by: SGOMEZ Escrow No.: FS773 A.P.N.: 775-2007018-8 TRA 020-025 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE IS FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED .GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS"$ 1105, Ocr [ X) computed on full value of property conveyed, or [ ] computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. ( ] unincorporated area ( X ] City of La Quinta FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, KSL Land Corporation, a Delaware Corporation hereby GRANT(S) 49 BEH Properties, LLC the following described real property in the County of Riverside, State of California See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Commonly known as: Vacant Land - Southern Hills (APN 775-200-018-8 TRA 020-025), La Quinta, CA 92253 Dated: June 16, 2014 STATE OF CALIF IA - COUNTY OF SS. On before me, I Notary Public KSL Land Corporation, a Delaware person=P ppeared Corporation who proved to me on the basis,of satisfactory By: Authorized ner evidence to be the person (s) whose name (s) is/are Sam Barton Vice President subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they executed the same in, his/ her/ their authorized capacity(ies), and by his/ her/ their signature (s) on the instrument the person (s), or the NILOA BALAi11R entity upon behalf of which the person (s) acted, . re COnWosion # 1994405 executed the instrument. NOW .y publift - Ce1Momis Rive do county I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the M Comm, t2x fres Oct 18. T016 laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. W ITNESSa Signatu (This area for official notary seal) MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE Order: QuickView_ Doc: RV:2014.00267602-06065 Page 1 of 4 Created By: bowens.m Printed: 7/21/2015 9:02:10 A PST all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. V DOC #2014-0267602 Page 2 of 4 07/18/2014 11:25 AM LARRY W..WARD Recorder P.O. Box 751 , COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Riverside, CA 92502-0751 r ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER (951) 486"7000 . ry ` www.rivmidcacr.wm NOTARY CLARITY Under the provisions of Government Code 27361.7, 1 certify under the penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the .document to which this statement is attached reads as follows: Name of Notary:14 �PF-(. Or a Commission # /OA `'f 405 Place of Execution: ` V/ Date Commission Expires:.0 LT to Date: 'Signature: Print Name: Peggy Layte p. ACR 186Rev. 09/2006 ( ) Available in Alternate Formats Order: QuickView_ Doc: RV:2014 0026760206065 Page 2 of 4 Created By: bowens.rn . Printed: 7/21/2015 9:02:10 PST { all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. IM DOC #2014-0267602 Page 3 of 4 07/18/2014 11:25 AM EXHIBIT A Legal Description The land hereinafter referred to is situated in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of CA, and is described as follows: PARCEL A: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28805, IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON FILE IN BOOK 192, PAGE(S) 84 AND 85 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, MINERALS, NATURAL GAS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN, GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES, METALLIFEROUS OR OTHER ORES, AND ALL PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM ANY OF THE FOREGOING, THAT MAY BE WITHIN OR UNDER THE PROPERTY, AND ALL RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOREGOING, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND OPERATING THEREFOR AND STORING IN AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM SAID LAND OR ANY OTHER LAND, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND MINE FROM LANDS OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY, OIL OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF THE PROPERTY AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES WITHOUT, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, STORE, EXPLORE AND OPERATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE UPPER FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE OF THE PROPERTY AS RESERVED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT/FILE NO. 473130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B; NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS FOR ACCESS, INGRESS, EGRESS, ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER PURPOSES AS SET FORTH IN THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, PGA WEST RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, RECORDED ON AUGUST 3, 7 990 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 28874 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY (THE "DECLARATION"), AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS BY WHICH THE LOT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 ABOVE WAS ANNEXED THERETO(THE "SUPPLEMENTARY DECLARATION") WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE THROUGH STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED UPON THE MAP OF TRACT NO. 25500-3 AS SUCH EASEMENT IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY DECLARATION, AND THE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE STREET ACCESS EASEMENT AREA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY DECLARATION; AND PARCEL C: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS FOR ACCESS, INGRESS AND EGRESS AND OTHER PURPOSES AS SET FORTH IN THE MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR PGA WEST, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECORDED ON JANUARY 22,'1986, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 15569, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY ('THE MASTER DECLARATION"). SUBJECT TO: 1.' CURRENT TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. 2. THE DECLARATION AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION, AND ANY AMENDMENTS TO EITHER OF THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS. AND -THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS. BENEFITS AND BURDENS THEREIN CONTAINED. EACH AND AIL OF WHICH ARE COVENANTS RUNNING WITH THE LAND ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1468 OF THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE FOR THE BENEFIT OF AND BINDING UPON THE PARTIES HERETO AND EACH SUCCESSIVE OWNER OF ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THE LAND AFFECTED THEREBY EXPRESSLY INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS THOUGH SET OUT HEREIN IN FULL. 3. THE MASTER DECLARATION AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR PGA WEST (MASTER ASSOCIATION) BY WHICH THE PROPERTY CONVEYED HEREBY WAS ANNEXED THERETO, AND ANY AMENDMENTS TO EITHER OF THE FOREGOING DOCUMENTS AND THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, BENEFITS AND BURDENS Preliminary Report Created: 06/13/2014 Page 14 510-1300841.51 Order: QuckView_ Doc: RV:2014 0026760206065 Page 3 of 4 Created By: bowens.m Printed: 7/21/2015 9:02:10 A PST The Way Escrow 16262 Whittier Blvd #7 Whittier, CA. 90603 562-650-6917 Phone thewayescrow@gmail.com NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. May 1; 2015. I '! Page Two, Hamilton Custom Home. Review by the Committee is only for Qeneral conformance,with. the Architectural Rules. It is the responsibility of the owner to fully understand and conform to the Architectural Rules Approvals given by the Architectural Committee are good for only six months from the date on the approval_letter. —Af _construction has not commenced within_. six -months -.after _the..project...__. approval date, a new application must be submitted. Upon completion of your project, please; complete ;and' .return The ' Notice of Completion of Architectural Change. For additional information or 'questions, the Board has directed that you contact Joanne Rose, CCAM, Association Manager, 'at 760/610-7750 direct or 760%346-1161. Sincerely, PGA WEST I1 Residential Association Architectural Committee cc: Board of Directors Sunshine Landscape CITY OF LA QUINTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GREEN SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CLEARANCE FOR RELEASE OF BUILDING PERMIT Form updated & effective 9/25/2009. Green Sheet approvals are forwarded to the Building & Safety Department directly by Public Works. Please DO NOT submit the Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) Packet to the Public Works Department until ALL requirements listed below are complete. , Incomplete applications or applications which cannot be processed will be returned to applicant. p 1 J2�e� Date: /Develo er: Tract* No.: Tract Name: Lot No.(s): Address(s): 7 3911mw(.� Phone Number. The following are the requirements for Public Works Clearance to authorize issuance of a building permit from the Building & Safety Department: CUSTOM HOMES: PROVIDE ITEMS #2, #3, #4, #5 & #7 BELOW ❑ TRACT HOMES: PROVIDE ITEMS #1, #2, #3 & #5 BELOW ❑ COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS/OTHER: PROVIDE ITEMS #1, #2, #3, #5 & #7 BELOW ❑ WALLS, SIGNS, OTHER: PROVIDE ITEM #6 BELOW 1. Attach Pad Elevation Certificates in compliance with the approved design elevation for building pad (maximum .allowable deviation of +/- 0.1 foot). Pad Elevation Certificates must be current (within 6 months of current date). If a precise grading plan creates the pad for approval, please withhold green sheet submittal until a Pad Elevation Certificate can be provided. 2. Attach geotechnical certification of grading plan compliance including compaction reports from a licensed Soils Engineer. Recently rough graded residential developments which have' a previously approved geotechnical certification are exempt from this requirement. 3. Attach recorded final map or title information/grant deed showing proposed building locations are legal lots. 4. Complete the attached <1 acre per lot or infill project Fugitive Dust Control project information form, PM10 plan & agreement or provide alternative & valid City approved PM 10 plan set reference number or hard copy plan. PM 10 plans for commercial & residential developments (beyond 1 lot) are submitted separately with grading plans & are subject to additional requirements. A current PM 10 certification.number is required., 5. Attach a copy of the rough or precise grading plan to the Public Works Department showing building location(s).for pad elevation verification. AO flood zone developments will require an approved flood plain development plan. 6. Attach supporting documentation for wall plan, monument, sign, grease trap or special facility installations. 7. Complete and sign the attached water quality management plan (WQMP) exemption form, if applicable. PW approved building construction projects require either a. WQMP or a completed WQMP exemption form. Approved maps/plans may be viewed at the following link: http://www.la-guinta.org/PlanCheck/m search.aspx have reviewed and confirmed the requirements listed above as presented and find the improvements to be sufficiently complete for construction of the proposed buildings/structures/walls/signs on the subject lot(s). Pursuant to my findings, the above project may be released for building permit issuance. This section completed by City staff. Recommended by: Date: Public Works Distribution: ( ) Green Sheet to Building & -Safety ( ) Green Sheet to Planning Department Declined for approval for reason(s) as follow(s), please correct and resubmit: TAChecklists - Forms & Applications\Forms & Applications\GREEN SHEET cover & PM10 less than 1 Acre Revised 10-02.12.doc City of La Quinta - PM 10 Fugitive Dust Control Project Information Construction Phase PM 10 Aoreement (< 1 acre/lot or Infill Proiect) Project Information Project Contractor:��- Project Phase (check one) Cil Construction 0 Demolition Project Name: Project Tract/Lot Numbers: Project Street Address: s` 7(�S "� �i tJ(�Q'�' "1�►t/ �22��j Total Acres in Active Construction (<1 acre per Lot): c5:2Anticipated Ole +151 Start Date: �/�/Anticipated Completion Date: PM10 Contact Information Please note: Dust control is required 24 hours. a day, 7 days a week, regardless of construction status. Person listed below is responsible for dust control during business and non -business hours. Name: l� Title: ©� Company Name: Mailing Address: 0 0 �� 05� City, State, ZIP Code: 22'0 C4 Primary Phone #: 0 Fax #: 24 Hour Emergency Phone#: �j- Cell Phone #: Email Address: Q O L PM 10 Certificate #: C O�2- 3 The above stated nronertv owner for autho ire renresen stivel- Shall act as his/her acknowledgement of dust control requirements and their enforceability, pursuant to SCAQMD Rules 403, 403.1, 401, 402, 201, 203 and PERP; •3 Shall constitute an Agreement to comply' with all project conditions as identified in the approved dust control plan. Acknowledges that dust control is required twenty-four. (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, throughout the period of project performance, regardless of project size or status; Shall ensure that each and every contractor, subcontractor and all other persons associated with the project shall be in continuous compliance with all requirements of the approved dust control plan; ❖ Shall take all necessary precautions to minimize dust; even if additional measures beyond those listed in the dust control plan are necessary., Shall authorize representatives of City/County to enter the property for inspection and/or abatement purposes; :• Shall hold harmless the City/County and its representatives from liability for any actions related to this dust control plan any City/County initiated abatement activities. Signature,of Property Owner or Authorized Representative bate I City of La Quinta - PM10- Fugitive Dust Control Plan (<T acre per Lot or' Infill Project)' This Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall take into account applicable SCAQMD Regulations Rule 403, 403.1, 40.1, 402, 201,.203 and Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP). ❖ WATERING: Continuous watering is required to prevent dust and must occur a minimum of four (4) times daily. Water shall be applied from an adequate sized metered water source to dry soils to, prevent: ■ Visible dust emissions > 20% opacity ■ Visible dust emissions that travel > 100 feet from the source (within site) ■ Visible dust emissions that cross any property line. . EDUCATION: The responsible dust control Individual and key personnel shall attend SCAQMD PM10 class and obtain PM10 certificate number prior to construction activity (training information may be obtained by contacting SCAQMD at (909) 396-2183). CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES: A copy of this approved Fugitive Dust Plan must be kept on site. At least one short-term stabilization method must be used. during off hours. At least one long-term stabilization measure must be used within ten (10) days of ceasing activity. ❖ WEATHER MONITORING: Wind predictions shall be monitored. SIGNAGE: Approved signs shall be installed at a highly visible. location. Please refer to the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Plan Handbook for Construction Signage Guidelines. TRAFFIC: Construction traffic shall not be allowed ,on the pad, unless absolutely necessary: If vehicles operate on pad, pad shall be kept firm and moist through 'hose watering and sprinklers; and a maximum traffic speed of 15mph will be enforced. Fugitive Dust shall be prevented by fencing off site to prevent unauthorized traffic on pad. PARKING: Parking is not allowed on pad. All vehicles must park on street at designated areas only. TRACK OUT: Provide 24 hour 'street cleaning and track out .system as approved by City Public Works inspectors. No dirt on, public or private roads. Track out shall be cleaned up within one (1) hour of incident and at the conclusion of each workday. s• DIRT PILES: Dirt piles shall be limited to 50 cubic yards. and built per California Building Code grading requirements. Piles shall be kept moist or covered with tarp material. Larger dirt piles will require stockpile or grading permit. FENCING: Provide PM10 fencing at perimeter of public roads and where applicable. Wood slat fencing can be installed at rear of property and return 20.feet on either side if HOA restrictions apply. Block walls can replace PM10 fencing during the construction phase: EQUIPMENT: Extra hoses and sprinklers shall be maintained on site. EXCAVATION MEASURES: All areasto be excavated or graded shall be pre -watered. Water shall also be applied during excavation or grading operations. DUMP TRUCKS: Open top dump trucks shall be wet down, moist and covered with a tarp prior to leaving site. INACTIVE SITE: Within 10 days of ceasing of activities, re -vegetate or permanently stabilize as required. o RECORD KEEPING: Fugitive Dust Control Plan records (i.e: self inspection records, -records of use of chemical suppressants, .etc.) shall be maintained for 3 years by, the Property Owner (or Authorized Representative). Property. Owner shall notify the City and SCAQMD within 10_ days of completion of project. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region Documentation of Project Not Requiring a WQMP but Requiring Site Design BMPs and Source Control BMPs by Entitlement Conditions of Approval or Permit Conditions — WQMP Required for the Listed Change of Land Uses or for Changes of Pollutant Stream (All Questions Below Must be Answered "No" To Exempt Project) Yes No Entitlement or construction of new single-family hillside residence(s) that create 10,000 square feet, or more, of impervious area where the pre -development natural slope is 25% or greater? X Entitlement or construction of new single-family hillside residence(s) that create 10,000 square feet, or more, of impervious area where the pre -development natural slope is 10% or greater where erosive soil conditions are known? X Entitlement or construction of new commercial and industrial development(s) of 100,000 square feet or more? Entitlement or construction of new automotive repair shop(s) including body, upholstery, paint, exhaust, tire, transmission, engine or other automotive specialty repair. (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, 7532, 7533, 7534, 7537, 7538, and 75391? X Entitlement or construction of new retail gasoline outlet(s) disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet? X Entitlement or construction of new restaurant(s) (or'potential restaurant shell space) disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet? Entitlement or construction of new home subdivision(s) with 10 or more housing units? x Entitlement or construction of new parking lot(s) of 5,000 square feet or more, or with 25 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to Urban Runoff? Applicant Information Name and Title Company Phone Email Project Information Project Name Type (SFH, Multi -Family, Commercial, Etc.) Location or Street Address Nearest Cross Streets Municipality/County/Zip Code La Quinta Tract Number(s) and/or Assessor Parcel Number(s) Other Location Information Watershed I Whitewater River Source Control BMP Information Size of Project Area (nearest 0.1 acre) Project Area managed with Site Design or Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs (nearest 0.1 acre) Is the project subject to onsite retention by City ordinance or policy? Name of the Entity that will implement, operate, and maintain the Source Control BMPs Contact Name Street or Mailing Address City Zip Code a! M Check Item . To be Performed Source Control BMP Requirements - All Projects Require Non -Structural BMP Source Control Non -Structural BMP (See Appendix H, Section 4.5.2.1) Ongoing Irrigation System and Landscape Maintenance Signature: Ongoing Litter Control Ongoing Drainage System Inspection & Maintenance Print Name: Education/Training for Property Owner, Operators, Occupants, or Employees Activity Restrictions — Prohibition of Debris Blowing/Sweeping/Washing into Street/Storm Drain, Closed Trash Lids, Restriction of Vehicle Washing Title:, Ongoing Street Sweeping at Private Streets and Private Parking Lots Check Item To be Provided Source Control BMP Requirements — Small Sloped Lots, Small Commercial, < 10 Unit Subdivisions, < 5,000 Square Ft. Parking Lots, Etc. Structural BMP (See Appendix H, Section 4.5.2.2) Date: Storm Drain Inlet Stenciling and Signage Phone: ( ) Landscape and Irrigation System Design to Minimize Erosion & Nuisance Runoff Protection of Slopes and Channels to Minimize Erosion Multi -Family Project Use of Community Car Wash Racks Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas to Use Sanitary Sewer Fueling Area (Design & Maintenance) Including PCC Surface, Canopy & Spill Prevention Air/Water Supply Area Drainage (Design & Maintenance) Including Spill Area Containment Trash Storage Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Attached Lids, Storm Water Controls Loading Docks (Design & Maintenance) Including Storm Water Controls, Dry & Frequent Cleaning Procedures Maintenance Bays (Design & Maintenance) Including Indoor Location & Storm Water Containment Vehicle and Equipment Wash Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment Outdoor Material Storage Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment Outdoor Work Areas or Processing Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment CC&R's, Maintenance Agreements or Other mechanisms will be used to ensure the ongoing operation, maintenance, funding, transfer and implementation of the project -specific WQMP requirements. Legal description and plat stamped by Registered Surveyor to be attached to the applicable CC&R or Maintenance Agreement for recordation at Riverside County. (Optional Requirement to be reviewed on a Project by Project basis) BMP Acknowledgement The applicant shall comply with listed BMPs and applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Signature: LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Print Name: Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Title:, Region Board Order No. R7-2008-0001 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ. Date: Phone: ( ) 11 Applicant Certification I certify that I have read this form in its entirety and understand the City's submittal and review process and the Signature: requirements for this form. I understand and agree that if. during the processing of the form, it is determined the Print Name: information contains errors or omissions, clarification and/or supplemental information may be required and the Title: preparation of such information may be considered, in the Community Development Director's judgment, an Date: unreasonable delay and will result in a suspension of processing time limits in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15109. Phone: ( ) Owner Certification certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that I am the property owner of the property that Signaiure is the subject matter of this application and I am authorizing and hereby do consent to the filling of this application and Print Name: acknowledge that the final approval by the City of La Quinta, if any, may result in restriction, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property. Title: Date: Phone: ( ) Building Permit Number. Project Description: SFR Exempt: ❑ (Materials may contain hazardous wastes and are not subject to recycling provisions) Construction Debris Management Plan Plan Submittal Datel 7/16/2015 Job Site Ownei i Number, Street, or PO Box City, State, Postal Code Owner's Phone Number I Owner's E -Mail Address ! Project Manager's Name ' Project Manager's Phone Number Project Manager's E-mail Address i Builder / Contractor Number, Street or PO Box ? City, State, Postal Code Project Square Footage City Approval By 55487 Southern Hills Bruce Hamilton 54777 Inverness Le Quinta, Ca. 92253 760-778-3603 Mark Howard 760-272-4691 howmark22(Mool-com Mark Howard -EI Rancho Homes P. O. Box Palm Desert, Ca. 92255 Date of City Approval 0'7/1(0)1S Materials Product Trash Asphalt Bdck/Block Cardboard Commingled Concrete Drywall Donated / Reuse* Tons Not recyclable Product Recyclable Masonry (broken) Recyclable Plaster Recyclable Scrap Metal Recyclable Tile (floor) Recyclable Tile (roof) Recyclable Wood Recyclable Landscape Debris 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 1.25 0.00 'Describe Items Totals: Recycle Trash 25.011 14.0 RECEIVED JUL B 4 2015 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Projected Diversion: 64.10°/b I understand It is the property owner's responsibility to submit copies of weight tickets or receipts to the District Environmental Coordinator as time hauls occur. I hereby certify that completion, implementation and adherence of the Debris Management Pian (DMP) for the above named project shall guarantee that at least 60% of the jobske waste is diverted from landfilling. The remaining material will be recycled or roused. I will divert, for recycling or re -use, remaining materials generated from the first day of the project through the completion of the project In accordance with this plan. This OMP is Issued in the name of the property owner(s) and shall remain their property throughout the construction and/or demolition project. A contractor serving as agent of the owner may obtain a DMP for the owner. However, the DMP Is still Issued in the name of the property owner(s) and the owner retains legal responsibility for ensuring that the provislons of the DMP are adhered to. The property owner(s) and general contractor shall be kept informed of the diversion progress through bi-monthly reports. If self -hauling, all refuse material from this project site must be taken to an approved recycler or transfer Owner / Developer / Project Manager / Superintendent Date YouNc°' EN61NEERING o A Fill aj Letter of Transmittal a' i " ' To: City of La�Quinta ; Today's Date: 12=17 - i. 78-495 Calle Tampico City Due Date: 1'2,21,-.15, La Quints, CA 92253, " . Project Address:,,! .:55-487,Southern• Hills_ Attn. t-,:Kay,� Jim" Plan Check #. BRES2015 Q208' Submittal:,,;, ®_ 15 4th., . �. ❑ 2nd • i a ❑ -'5th y . [I 3rd .,- ❑ Other:. We are forwarding ; ®:; By Messenger, ❑' ' ti. By Mail ,(Fed Ex or UPS)' -' ❑ <N Your:Pickup.` Includes „ i Descriptions: Includes:` # Of a Descriptions , ' Copies: . 171 Structural'Plans ® 1' Revised Struct Plans 0 Structural .Calculations.- ` Ell' *� -;Revised Struct. Calcs ` ❑ '' F _ Truss'Calcs:' El1 Revised,Truss Calcs': ' Ell Soils Report ❑ Revised Soils Report" ❑� Structural`P/C Comments® ' - 1,'� " "_. App'rovedStructural Plans- . ~. ❑: Redlined Structural Plans ,.. ❑o Approved., Structural'Calcs,' El°'. Redlined.Structural Calcs ❑ Approved Truss Calcs �Redlined.Truss Calcs •: ❑ zApproved'Soils Report ' ❑ Redlined 'Soils Reports ® 1, -Other: Revised Plan Sheets i .'S71:2,'SD-1. :dated 12-,01-15 � w Comments. structural content is approvable. Plan sheet S 1:2 and SDA Dated 12-01-15 shall replace the, . corresponding sheets dated 10-26-15. StructuratPlan Review.Time ='2:75 HR 'Thi+s Mater:i;aI4S,ent fo.r ` i Your Files ❑ ;Per Your R'e`quest r '" :.. u Yor Review. ❑ Approval _ .F • ,. 1, El Checking ' ❑ At the request of `1 Other: ❑' T i} t i, x 'By John W:�.Thompson w - C `ED Office ® (760) _ 772-5107 r r Other ❑'' a �M:, y,y � DEC 19 2095, CITY OF LA QUI A _ COMMUNBY,1V`1! Bin # / City of La Q uin to K Safe Division r Building h, 78-495 Calle Tampico 2`� La Quinta, CA 92253 - (760) 777-7012 v Building Permit Application and Tracking Sheet Permit # Project Address:f" 4B 7 Owner's Name:—/z//w, A. P. Number: 77� . Address: Legal Description: P40=t'l City, ST, Zip: (7,)rtti—rA Contractor: T ele hone: P zz)&, ............. Address: Project Description. City, ST, Zip: Telephone: � � D r[ N tt LJ 1.)t to tet( State Lic. # : City Lic. #.: C—TS /� �AWN Arch., Engr., Designer: /�(� t. j��-i{� Address: 'ZpjZSrC' ACIddCj( S� P(4Mr,,*6 Ow— l.rUf efaJ City, ST, Zip: Telephone: hone: Z '. on trucPe•ti nTY Occupancy: • State Lic. # Pr hPa (circle one): Alter Repair Demo New Add'n J Name of Contact Person: Sq. Ft.: # Stories: # Units: Telephone # of Contact Person: Z7Z, Estimated Value of Project: APPLICANT: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE H Submittal Req'd Rcc'd TRACKING PERMIT FEES Plan Sets Plan Check submitted Item Amount Structural Cales. Reviewed, ready for corrections Plan Check Deposit Truss Calcs. Called Contact Person Plan Check Balance Title 24 Cales. Plans picked up Construction Flood plain plan Plans resubmitted Mechanical Grading plan 2nd Review, ready for corrections/issueElectrical Subcontactor List Called Contact Person Plumbing Grant Deed Plans picked up S.M.I. II.O.A. Approval Plans resubmitted Grading IN HOUSE:- Review, ready for correctionstissue Developer Impact Fee Planning Approval Called Contact Person A.I.P.P. Pub. Wks. Appr Date of permit issue School Fees, Total Permit Fees YOUNG :ENGINEERING-, ' Letterbf Transmittal. To: City of La'Quinta �� Today's'Date. 8-17 15 : Cit °'8-7 78=495 Calle, Tampico a y Due Date. -15:" " La` Quinta; CA'92253. } Project Address: 55487 Southern Hills Attn .�',- Kay ; x Plan'Check # BRES 201.5=0208 +` Submittal ❑; 1si' 4th': ® r:2nd ❑ . 5th; J ❑'"' 3 d ❑ Other: J J Weare forwarding: By Messenger . ❑' By Mail (Fed Ex or UPS) ❑ Your Pickup . k• Iricludes: 410f Descriptions 'Includes # Of Descriptions: '.Copies: cif Copies: ^ r ❑ Structural. Plans ® 1 s Revised• Structural Plans ralCalculation • ' * 0 ® 1 ' St'ructu`s �. evised Struct. talcs R Truss Calculations. Floor 'and Roof• ❑ F Revised Truss , - ;r Soils Report,"" ,. ❑ Revised Soils Report Structural Comrrient List/- 0 ®' 2 4 Approved Structural Rlans' Res onses rb` �. p .. ®: 1"RedlinedStrucfural Plans j,,: T❑ Approved Structural talcs ; ❑ Redlined S,teuctural.Calcs „ s s' ❑ ' Approved'Truss talcs. ❑ " Re, r d�T ss•Calcs -: ❑ ;: . Approved Soils Report s R n,ff Soils ( q4y r:E] to E Other: , Commenfs: ' ! Structural content i a provable s w• r '" �, 4 - .. tA If you have any questions, :p 6NI1JE1/t:ap: Time .5 HR i' F "' . cSent' �• :. T'his Material for ❑' ..Your Files. ® Per Your Request Y urReviewf.t: ❑APp"royal F Checking c + ❑ At the request of Other: ❑ BY,.. Kathryn Samuels , Palm Desert -Office': ®(760) 7..72=5107 < Other : ❑ X r ' 4' , r BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS REPORT s PROJECT: t Hamilton Residence 55487 Southern Hill r LA QUI NTA, CA 92253 Project Designer: Hannouche Architects r 20250 Acacia Street,Suite 145 Newport Beach, CA 92660 y;f (949)261-2070 Report Prepared by: Gangyi Zhou GMEP Engineers i 26439 Rancho Parkway S., Ste 120 . Lake Forest, CA 92630 , CITY OF LA C� BUILDING &SAFETY DEPT. APPROVED FOR CON RUCTION DATE g I8 1Q�S b Number: 63606 f WON Date: 7/14/2015/]� litrhis L p�&�QS NT4The EnergyPro computer program has been,used to perform the calculations summarizom i o I nd is authorized by the California Energy Cotmission for use with both the Residential ande 1 Ouil itn �3�r��nda s. This program developed by EnergySoft, LLC —ysoft.com. SRUCT1� Ener Pro 6.3 by EnergySoft User Number. 8165 606 r it CITY OF �AF ,q BUILDING & QUINTq` ETY DEpT APPROVES FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE EnergyPro 6.3 by EnergySoftJob Number. ID: 63606 . Number. 8165 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Date/Time: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml CF1R-PRF-01 Page 1 of 9 GENERAL INFORMATION " 01 Project Name Hamilton Residence -vb w: rt a• .r r r. r t4 -w t? 9" � 11`1% 02 This building Incorporates feature that require flelil•testing a -- verification by a certifled�HERS rater under the supervision of a CECapproved HERS provider. \)ti. K .M. Fr •a#_.._.__ H Tal r....1i .. M - YI M, _ .. 02 Calculation Description Title 24 Analysis I_- n1. .7 d` OM1, W—J V 1: 1 03 Project Location 55487 Southern Hill ENERGY USE SUMMARY 04 A City LA QUINTA os Standards Version Compliance 2014 06 Zip code 92253 07 Compllance'Manager Version BEMCmpMgr2013-3 (651) 08 Climate Zone CZ15 09 Software Version EnergyPro 6.3 10 Building Type Single Family 11 Front Orientation (deg/Cardinal) 45 12 Project Scope Newly Constructed 13 Number. of Dwelling Units 1 14 Total Cond. Floor Area (FT2) 3340 15 Number of Zones 1 16 Slab Area (FT2) 3340 17 Number of Stories 1 •18 Addition Cond. Floor A"ria 1 N/A 19 Natural Gas Available Yes 20 Addition Slab Areaa(F'2J N/A 21 Glazing Percentage (%) 47.9% COMPLIANCE RESULTSY - 01 Building Complies viitliaCompute%Performance jo '" $—"" "r M! AAR., -vb w: rt a• .r r r. r t4 -w t? 9" � 11`1% 02 This building Incorporates feature that require flelil•testing a -- verification by a certifled�HERS rater under the supervision of a CECapproved HERS provider. \)ti. K .M. Fr •a#_.._.__ H Tal r....1i .. M - YI M, _ .. 03 This building Incorporates one or;�"more Special�Feat�ures sr,ghow�,,below 0A. � K �i�: � k;;, _ k -" I_- n1. .7 d` OM1, W—J V 1: 1 tL! G 'IF -V ENERGY USE SUMMARY 04 05 06 07 08 Energy Use Standard Proposed (kTDV/ft) Design Design Compliance . Margin Percent Improvement Space Heating 1.28 4.11 - -2.83 -221.1% Space Cooling 103.33 101.93 1.40 1.4% IAQ Ventilation .0.85 0.85 0.00 0.0% ' • Water Heating 8.12 4.93 •• 3.19 39.3% Photovoltaic Offset -- 0.00. 0.00 -- Compliance Energy Total 113.58 -111.82 1.76 1.5% Registration Number: 215-N0056727B-000000000-0000 �� Registration Datefl-ime: 2015-07-1507:48:23 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. _ CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance . Report Version - CFIR-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT, FOR APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DATE ____BY ,r CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CF1R-PRF-01 Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Daterrime: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Page 2 of 9 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml REQUIRED SPECIAL FEATURES The following are features that must be installed as condition for meeting the modeled energy performance for this computer analysis. • Ducts with high level of Insulation - • Cathedral Ceiling • Window overhangs and/or fins HERS FEATURE SUMMARY The following is a summary of the features that must be field -verified by a certified HERS Rater as a condition for meeting the modeled energy performance for this computer analysis. Additional detail is provided in the building components tables below. Building -level Verifications: • High Quality Insulation Installation (QII) i • IAO mechanical ventilation Cooling System Verifications: • Verified EER • Verified SEER • Refrigerant Charge • Fan Efficacy Watts/CFM HVAC Distribution System Verfficatlens: • Duct Sealing • Verified low -leakage ducts located entirety In conditioned -spec Domestic Hot Water System Verifications:, r�C 0041 • — None -- - .i R r ' .=71: t C ENERGY DESIGN RATING * I r r % *„ 0% 0101► .0%. w r � . s,; 0% This is the sum of the annual TDV energy consumption for energy US9 components included in the"-perfoimance•compiiancelapp"roach-for 14Standard Design Building (Energy Budget) and the annual TDV energy consumption for lighting and components not regulated by Title 24, Part 6 (such as domestic appliances and consumer electronics) and accounting for the annual TDV energy offset by an on-site renewable energy system. Reference Energy Use: Energy,Design:Ratirig. .�!',,w:,; Margin Percent Improvement Total Energy (kTDV/f2)• 154.04 - - " ; ] 52.28 • ' r, e ' •'�' 1.76 1.1 includes calculated Appliances and Miscellaneous Energy Use (AMEU) BUILDING - FEATURES INFORMATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 a 07 Project Name Number of Dwelling Conditioned Floor Area (sft) Units Number of Bedrooms Number of Zones Number of Ventilation Cooling Systems Number of Water Heating Systems Hamilton Residence 3340 1 3 1 0 - t Registration Number: 215-No056727B-000000000.0000 , Registration Date/Time: 2015-07-15 07:46:23 HERS Provider: CaiCERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CFIR-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 al OF LA U►LDING & SAFETY /N7A, EPT ORCONSTRUCT/ON DATE BY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CFIR-PRF-01 Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Daterrime: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Page 3 of 9 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml OPAQUE SURFACES ZONE INFORMATION 01 02 03 - 04 05 06 07 . Zone Name Zone Type Zone Floor Area Avg, Calling, - HVAC System Name (ftz) Height Water Heating.System 1 Water Heating System 2 Living Area Conditioned ' ' Split Systeml • 3340 10 DHW Sys 1 03 OPAQUE SURFACES 01 02 03 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Name Zone Construction Azimuth Orientation Gross Area (ft2) Window Area (ft2) Tilt(deg) Exterior Wall N Living Area R-19 Wall 0 - specify - 357.5 82 90 Exterior Wall NE Living Area R-19 Wall 45 Front 560 360 90 Exterior Wall E Living Area R-19 Wall 90 - - specify - _ 76 - 0 - 90 Exterior Wall SE jLiving Area R-19 Wall 135 Left 630 80 90 Exterior Wall S J Libing Area R-19 Wall 180 - specify - 50 40 90 . Exterior Wall SW,, `t Q, / Living"Area _,, . . . R-19 Wall 225 Back '862.5 748 90 Exterior. Wall W . '�'\,q Living Area,4--;p% I#"R90g 2�0 t - specify - 143.3 100 90 Exterior Wail NW Living Area A is � R -19)W_ j I Nk3,1�Right?M 365 176 90 Exterior Wall NW 2 ��' GBrage�, tV Garage Ext.Wali VA %�315# ' V Rigfit (y 360 0 90 Exterior Wall NE 2 V GarageA :W r_ jt;Gar1ge Ext Wall 1OS X45 «i Front 1 277.5 0 90 Exterior Wall SE 2 Garage F' 'Garage Ext Wall - 135 Left. 335 0 90 Exterior Wall SW 2 Garage Garage Ext Wall 225 . Back 123 0 90 Interior Surface NW Garage R-13 Wall 360 Interior Surface NE Garage R-13 Wall - 277.5 Interior Surface SE • Garage-' R-13 Wall 335 Interior Surface SW " Garage R-13 Wall 123. Interior Surface Garage»Living Area R-13 Wall 170 ------------ OPAQUE SURFACES — Cathedral Ceilings 01 02 03 04 05 08 09 Ao 11 Name - Zone Type Orlentatio n Area (ft2) Skylight Area (ft2) Ro*RiseRoof (x Roof Roof Roof Tilt Reflectan Emmittanc (deg) ce, a Framin g Factor Roof - Living Area R-38 Roof Cathedral - specify - 3340 15 0 0.1 0.85 0.1 Roof 2 Garage R-38 Roof Cathedral -specify - 851 0 0 0.1 0.85 0.1 i Registration Number: 215-N0056727B-000000000.0000 Registration Date/Tme: 2015-07-15 07:48:23 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 _ HERS Provider: Ca10ERTS Inc. Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 i CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CFIR-PRF-01 Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation DateITime: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Page 4 of 9 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml WINDOWS 01 02 - 03 04 05 06 - 07 08 09 10 Name Type Surface (Orientation -Azimuth) Width(ft) Height (ft) Multiplier Area (ft) U -factor SHGC Exterior Shading F.X. Glass Window Exterior Wall N (- specify -0) 5.0 10.0 1 50.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 2 Window Exterior Wall N (- specify -0) 16.0 2.0 1 32.0 . 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 3 Window Exterior Wall NE (Front -45) -- -- 1 100.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass Window Exterior Wall NE (Front45) -- - 1 80.0 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass 2 Window Exterior Wall NE (Front -45) -- -- 1 60.0 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 4 Window Exterior Wall NE (Front -45) 4.0 10.0 3 120.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 5 Window Exterior Wall SE (Left -135) -- -- 1 72.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) Openable Window Exterior Wall SE (Left -135) -- - 1 6.0 0.52 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 6 Window'- Exterior Wall S (-specify --180) 4.0 10.0 1 40.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 7 Window kS_-Extedor_Wall SW_(Back-225) 6.8 10.0 1 68.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 8 Window'* _Exted6r-Wall'SW (Back -225) _ 6.0 10.0 2 120.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass 3 Windowo-Exterior Wall SW(BadEu225j 1 �36 Oa 10.0 tib 60.o 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass 4 Window �� Exterior' -Wall St(Ba'dc'225) 10:0# tO.Ow -710 1� ; OO& 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass 5 Window Exterior Wall SWf(Badj�25)A- '*w% r10 6' 1 r,; .'000.0 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) S.L.D. Glass 6 Window - Ex[erior Wall W (- specify" T270)A V_ If 110:0 110.0 �- t1� 1 a` x'100.0 0.43 0.23 Insect Screen (default) • F.X. Glass 9 Window Exterior Wall NW (Right -315) 5.0 10.0 1 50.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 10 Window Exterior Wall NW (Right -315) 5.2 10.0 1 , 52.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) F.X. Glass 11 Window Exterior Wall NW (Right -315) 5.0 10.0 1 50.0 0.36 0.24 Insect Screen (default) Openable 2 Window Exterior Wall NW (Right -315) -- -- 1 24.0 0.52 0.24 Insect Screen (default) Skylight Skylight Roof (- specify -45) 1 15.0 0.52 0.16 Registration Number: 215-N0056727B-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: • 2015-07-15 07:48:23 HERS Provider: CaICERTS Inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 CITY OF LA BUILDING & SAFQUINTA ETY DEPT FOR PR®VC® CONSTRUCTION DATE By CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD t Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Datefrime: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml CF1 R -PRF -01 Page 5 of 9 OVERHANGS AND FINS 01 02 03 04 05 ' OB Construction Name Surface Type Construction Type Framing Total Cavity R -value ' 01 02 03 04 1 06 1 06 07 1 B 1 09 1 10 11 12• 1 13 1 14 • Cavity/Frame: R -19/2x6 Overhang Exterior Walls Wood Framed Wall 2x6 @ 16 in. O.C. Left Fin Exterior Finish: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking Right Fin Window . Left Depth Dist Up Extent Right Extent Flap Ht. Depth Top Up DIstL Bot Up Depth Top Up ''. Dist R Bot Up F.X. Glass 10 0.1 10 10 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F.X. Glass 2, 4 0.1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 ` 0 0 F.X. Glass 4 2 0.1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 F.X. Glass 6 10 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 F.X. Glass 7 t0 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F.X. Glass 8 10 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S.L.D. Glass 3 10 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S.L.D. Glass 4 101 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S.L.D. Glass 5 161A 0.1 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S.L.D. Glass 6 " "` =101 1 X0:1— • —10—,. y,,,,,10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F.X. Glass 9 ' ':%„10 - O:j �0 1900 0”, 0 .�! OM 0 0 0 0 0' 0 F.X. Glass 10 0,-, >-,�0.1 10� dab �0� M 0� OK; r,'J1 � 0 0 0 , 0 0 F.X. Glass 11 �'J 't X 10.1 1 2 t_�y � „00 0 0n' K 0" % 0 0 0 0 0 OPAQUE SURFACE CONSTRUCTIONS` Iz— r- F-% A—J V 1• L-0 V-- 01 02 03 04 05 ' OB Construction Name Surface Type Construction Type Framing Total Cavity R -value Assembly Layers ,j Inside Finish: Gypsum Board • Cavity/Frame: R -19/2x6 R-19 Wall Exterior Walls Wood Framed Wall 2x6 @ 16 in. O.C. R19 Exterior Finish: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking Inside Finish: Gypsum Board Cavity/Frame: R -38/2x12 Roof Deck: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking R-38 Roof Cathedral Cathedral Ceilings Wood Framed Ceiling 2x12 @ 16 in. O.C. R 38 Roofing: Light Roof (Asphalt Shingle) Inside Finish: Gypsum Board • Cavity/Frame: R -13/2x4 R-13 Wall Interior Walls Wood Framed Wall 2x4 @ 16 in. O.C. R 13 Other Side Finish: Gypsum Board Registration Number: 215-NO056727B-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2015-07-15 07:46:23 HERS Provider: CalCERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 0 TY OF LA BUILDING & SAFETYQU 1NT;q P -r, FO P OFjOVE® NSTRUCTION • SATE ��BY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CF1R-PRF-01 Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Dater rime: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015, Page 6 of 9 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml SLAB FLOORS A 01 Jri 02 - 03 04 05 06 Name System Type Distribution Type Water Heater Number of Heaters Solar Fraction (% ) `'5Hw3"0*7"„,,,,, DHW Sys 1 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Name Zone Area (ft2) Perimeter (ft) Edge Insul. R -value& Depth Carpeted Fraction Heated Slab -on -Grade Living Area 3340 314.6 None 0.8 No Slab -on -Grade 2 Garage 851 118.3 None' 0 No BUILDING ENVELOPE - HERS VERIFICATION 01 02 03 04 Quality Insulation Installation (01I) Quality Installation of Spray Foam Insulation Building Envelope Air Leakage ACH @ 50 Pa Required Not Required Not Required, - WATER HEATING SYSTEMS A 01 Jri 02 - 03 04 05 06 Name System Type Distribution Type Water Heater Number of Heaters Solar Fraction (% ) `'5Hw3"0*7"„,,,,, DHW Sys 1 r Standard DHW Heater ,l 1 .0% WATER HEATERS -Ift 40,<� 0, *% f' %--. 01 62'� �� U3 � I _ XOd1 N .OS € Ilk 07 08 Name ' Heater Element Type �+ E R J Tank Type n P,. A"; Tank Volumes (gal) �rJ Energy Factor or Efficiency R Input Rating Tank Exterior Insulation R -value Standby Loss , (Fraction) DHW Heater 1 Natural Gas - Small Instantaneous 0 0.84 199000-Btu/hr 0 0 WATER HEATING - HERS VERIFICATION 01 02 -. 03 04 05 06 07 - - Name - Pipe Insulation Parallel Piping - Compact Distribution Point -of Use Recirculation Control Central DHW Distribution DHW Sys 1 - 1/1' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A e , Registration Number: 215-1,100567278-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2015.07.1507:48:23 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 CITY Or LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. %PROVC® A FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE---.- BY i CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CFIR-PRF-01 Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Date/Time: 08:18, Mon, J6113, 2015 Page 7 of 9 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml HVAC SYSTEMS 01 02 03 - 04 05 06 07 ig4 Zbnaly�Controlled Multl-speed • Compressor Heating System Cooling System Distribution 16 � J . rrw. ..:�, a .� a Floor Area Name System Type Name Ducted Name Ducted System Fan System Served Split System Other Heat/Cool Heating Component 1 Yes Cooling Component 1 Yes Air Distribution System 1 Conditioned Zone 3340 Split Systeml Other Heat/Cool Heating Component 1 Yes Cooling Component 1 Yes Air Distribution System 1 3340 HVAC - HEATING SYSTEMS 01 02 03 Name Type Efficiency Heating Component 1 - ' CntrlFurnace - Fuel -fired central furnace 80 AFUE HVAC -COOLING SYSTEMS 01 02'1+—^—"�,,,, f� owo+ M^ 03 04 05 06 07 Name D Efficiency -' EER g R stem T Jr ig4 Zbnaly�Controlled Multl-speed • Compressor HERS Verification Cooling Component 1system SplitAirCond - Spiit`av bnditionin'g'I � &W 13 a i + an, — r 16 � J . rrw. ..:�, a .� a V * `t1�010 No a'►- wry �W-k .No Cooling Component 1 -hers -cool HVAC COOLING - HERS VERIFICATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 Name Verified Airflow Airflow Target Verified EER Verified Refrigerant Verified SEER Charge Cooling Component 1 -hers -cool Required 350 Required Required Required HVAC - DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 01 02 03 04 05 - 06 07 08 Supply Duct Name Type Duct Leakage Insulation R -value Location Return -Duct Bypass Duct HERS Verification Air Distribution System 1 . Ducts located entirely in Sealed and tested 8 Conditioned Zone Conditioned Zone None Air Distribution conditioned space Systemm 1-hers-ddist 11 Registration Number: 215-No056727B-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2015-07-15 07:48:23 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE BY f ' CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Date/Time: 08:18, Mon, Jul,13, 2015 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057 63606 Hamilton Residence.xml CF 1 R -PRF -01 Page 8 of 9 f HVAC DISTRIBUTION - HERS VERIFICATION '01 02 03 04 05 06 07 DwellingUnit Duct Leakage I Default 0 Required Verified Duct Design Low -leakage Name Verification Duct Leakage Target I%) Verified Duct Location f Return Supply Air Handler Air Distribution System Required 6.0 - Required Not Required Not Required -- 1-hers-dist HVAC - FAN SYSTEMS• 01 02 03 04 Name Type . Fan Power (Watts/CFM) HERS Verification HVAC Fan 1 Single Speed PSC Furnace Fan 0.58 HVAC Fan 1 -hers -fan W HVAC FAN SYSTEMS - HERS VERIFICATION J S _ 01 Ink 02 - - 03 VerifledFanWaft Draw Required Fan Efficiency (Watts/CFM) HVAC Fan 1-hers=fan '- " Required 0.58 ' IAQ (Indoor Air Quality) FANS,F41"_;; 01 i —.� NO0FN♦� '411WX A 1'011400 0 0 3) 1 9 ft_ ' 0 � *0 � � 0S 08 Name tptW CF� H - " RP 0 _ IAQ IAQ Watts/CFM �iYiti41 C# ecovery If 11 IAQA an Ty a ', EffeQctlRveness(%) HERS Verification DwellingUnit 63.4 0.25 I Default 0 Required i Registration Number: 215-N0056727B-000000000-0000 Registration Date/fime: 2015-07-1507:48:23 ' HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015.07-13 08:20:01 CITY OF'A QUIfVTq BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. APPR®VE® OR CONSTRUCTION DATE `_By CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: Hamilton Residence Calculation Date/Time: 08:18, Mon, Jul 13, 2015 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: 15-057'63606 Hamilton Residence.xml CF1R-PRF-01 Page 9 of 9 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT ii 1. 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: Documentation Author Signature: Gary Zhou Company: Signature Date: Gouvis Engineering Consulting Group 2015-07-13 09:11:11 Address: CEA/HERS Certification Identification (if applicable): 4400 -campus Dr Citi/State/Zip: Phone: Newport Beach; CA 92660 949-752-1612 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT IF I certify the following under penalty of pedury, undgr the laws of the State of California: 1. I am eligible under Division 3 of the Businessland Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building desigA identified on this Certificate of Compliance. 2. 1 certify that the energy features and per( ormance specifications identified on this Certificate of Compliance conform to the requirements of Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of, Regulations. ' 3. The building design features or system d6gnfegures ileni d ,oWthisCdnificte of Compliance are consistent with the information provided on other applicable compliance documents, worksheets, calculations, plans aQd,specifications s qrt e to�I heenforcme5.agn_c�jorlpprotljis,builcfing pgpit application. Responsible Designer Name: �Co -�!LalLA" - ponsIl ble besign-er S.igA1ata1ro Lam Jff"w An Mark Howard ffk1 Company: p E: R,S Date ' V E R El Rancho Homes Inc. 2015-07-15 07:48:23 Address: License: PO Box 10389 N/A City/State/Zip: Phone: Palm Desert, CA 92255 760-272-4691 information. 4 Registration, Number: 215-N0056727B-000000000-0000' •Registration Date/rime: 2015.07-1507:48:23 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Residential C6mpliance Report Version - CF1R-10172014-651 Report Generated at: 2015-07-13 08:20:01 .CITY. OF UINTA BUILDING NG & SAFETY DEPT APPROVED 1, .FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE BY MANDATORY MEASURES SUMMARY: Residential Pae 1 of 3 MF -1R Project Name I Date Hamilton Residence 1711412015 NOTE: Low-rise residential buildings subject to the Standards must comply with all applicable mandatory measures listed, regardless of the compliance approach used. More'stringent energy measures listed on the Certificate of Compliance (CF -1 R, CF -1 R -ADD, or CF - 1 R -ALT Form) shall supersede the items marked with an asterisk (*) below. This Mandatory Measures Summary shall be incorporated into the permit documents, and the applicable features shall be considered by all parties as minimum component performance specifications whether they are shown elsewhere in the documents or in this summary. Submit all applicable sections of the MF -1 R Form with plans. Building Envelope Measures: 110.6(a)l: Doors and windows between conditioned and unconditioned spaces are manufactured to limit air leakage. §110.6(a)4: Fenestration products (except field -fabricated windows) have a label listing the certified U -Factor, certified Solar Heat Gain Coefficient SHGC , and infiltration that meets the requirements of 10-111 (a). 110.7: Exterior doors and windows are weather-stripped; all joints and penetrations are caulked and sealed. 110.8(a): Insulationspecified or installed meets Standards for Insulating Material. Indicate type and include on CF -2R Form: §110.8(i): The thermal emittance and solar reflectance values of the cool roofing material meets the requirements of §110.8(i) when the installation of a Cool Roof is specified on the CF -1 R Form. *§1 50.0 a : Minimum R-30 R-19 for Alterations insulation in wood -'frame ceiling orequivalent U -factor. §150.0(b): Loose fill insulation shall conform with manufacturer's installed design labeled R -Value. *§1 50.0 c : Minimum R-13 insulation in 2x4 wood -frame wall R-19 in 2x6 orequivalent U -factor. *§1 50.0 d : Minimum R-19 insulation in raised wood -frame floor orequivalent U -factor. 150.0(f): Air retarding wrap is tested, labeled, and installed according to ASTM E1677-95 2000 when specified on the CF -1 R Form. 150.0 : Mandatory Vapor barrier installed in Climate Zones 14 or 16. §150.0(1): Water absorption rate for slab edge insulation material alone without facings is no greater than 0.3%; water vapor permeance rate is no greater than 2.0perm/inch and shall be protected from physical damage and UV light deterioration. §150.0(q) Fenestration Products. Fenestration separating conditioned space from unconditioned space or outdoors shall meet the requirements of either Item 1 or 2 below: 1. Fenestration, including skylight products, must have a maximum U -factor of 0.58. 2. The weighted average U -factor of all fenestration, including skylight products, shall not exceed 0.58. EXCEPTION to Section 150.0(q)1: Up to 10 square feet of fenestration area or 0.5 percent of the Conditioned Floor Area, whichever is. reater, is exempt from the maximum U -factor requirement. 150.0 r Solar Ready Buildings. Shall meet the requirements of Section 110.10 applicable to the building project. Fireplaces, Decorative Gas Appliances and Gas Log Measures: 150.0 e 1 A: Masonry or factory -built fireplaces have a closable metal or glass door covering the entire opening of the firebox. §150.0(e)1 B: Masonry or factory -built fireplaces have a combustion outside air intake, which is at least six square inches in area and is equipped with a with a readily accessible, operable, and tight-fifting tight-fittingdamper and or a combustion -air control device. §150.0(e)2: Continuous burning pilot lights and the use of indoor air for cooling a firebox jacket, when that indoor air is vented to the outside of the building, are prohibited. Space Conditioning, Water Heating and Plumbing System Measures: §110.0-§110.3: HVAC equipment, water heaters, showerheads, faucets and all other regulated appliances are certified by the Energy Commission. §110.3(c)5: Water heating recirculation loops serving multiple dwelling units and High -Rise residential occupancies meet the air release valve, backflow prevention, pump isolation valve, and recirculation loop connection requirements of §110.3(c)5. 11 §110.5: Continuously burning pilot lights are prohibited for natural gas: fan -type central furnaces, household cooking appliances (appliances with an electrical supply voltage connection with pilot lights that consume less than 150 Btu/hr are exempt), and pool and spa heaters. 150.0(h): Heating and/or cooling loads are calculated in accordance with ASHRAE, SMACNA or ACCA. 150.0(i): Heating systems are equipped with thermostats that meet the setback requirements of Section 11 0.2 c . §150.00)1A: Storage gas water heaters rated with an Energy Factor no greater than the federal minimal standard are externally wrapped with insulation having an installed thermal resistance of R-12 or greater. I §150.00)113: Unfired storage tanks, such as storage tanks or backup tanks for solar water e s e o e in tanks have R-12 external insulation or R-16 internal insulation where the internal insulatio �tt R v i i in o h tank. � APPROVED F FOR CONSTRUCTION' EnergyPro 6.3 by EnergySoft User Number: 8165 QATAca BY Page 12 of 1 • a MANDATORY MEASURES SUMMARY: Residential "(Page 2 of 3 IMFAR Project Name Date Hamilton Residence 1711412015 §150.00)2A: All domestic hot water system piping conditions listed below, whether buried or unburied, must be insulated per TABLE 120.3-A. i. The first 5 feet (1.5 meters) of hot and cold water pipes from the storage tank. ii. All piping with a nominal diameter of 3/4 inch (19 millimeter) or larger. iii. All piping associated with a domestic hot water recirculation system regardless of the pipe diameter. iv. Piping from the heating source to storage tank or between tanks. v. Piping buried below grade. vi. All hot water pipes from the heating source to the kitchen fixtures. §150.00)2: Pipe insulation for steam hydronic heating systems or hot water systems >15 psi, meets the requirements of Standards Table 120.3-A. ` 150.00)3A: Insulation is protected from damage, including that due to sunlight, moisture, equipment maintenance, and wind. §150.00)4: Solar water -heating systems and/or collectors are certified by the Solar Rating and Certification Corporation. §150.0(m)1: All air -distribution system ducts and plenums installed, are sealed and insulated to meet the requirements of CMC Sections 601, 602, 603, 604, 605 and Standard 6-5; supply -air and retum-air ducts and plenums are insulated to a minimum installed level of R-6 or enclosed entirely in conditioned space. Openings shall be sealed with mastic, tape or.other duct -closure system that meets the applicable requirements of UL 181, UL 181 A, or UL 181 B or aerosol sealant that meets the requirements of UL 723. If mastic or tape is used to seal openings reate� than 1/4 inch, the combination of mastic and either mesh or tape shall be used §150.0(m)1: Building cavities, support platforms for air handlers, and plenums defined or constructed with materials other than sealed sheet metal, duct board or flexible duct shall not be used for conveying conditioned air. Building cavities and support platforms may contain ducts. Ducts installed in cavities and support platforms shall not be compressed to cause reductions in the cross-sectional area of the ducts. §150.0(m)2D: Joints and seams -of duct systems and their components shall not be sealed with cloth back rubber adhesive duct tapes unless such tape is used in combination with mastic and draw bands. . 150.0(m)7: Exhaust fans stems have`back draft or automatic dam ers. §150.0(m)8: Gravity ventilating systems serving conditioned space have either automatic or readily accessible, manually operated dampers. §150.0(m)9: Insulation shall be protected from damage, including that due to sunlight, moisture, equipment maintenance, and wind. Cellular foam insulation shall be protected as above or painted with a coating -that is water retardant and provides shielding from solar radiation that can cause degradation of the material. 150.0 m 10: Flexible ducts cannot have porous inner cores. §150.0(n)1: Systems using gas or propane water heaters, whether tank or on -demand, to serve individual dwelling units shall include all the following components : I' A. A 120V electrical receptacle that is within 3 feet from the water heater and accessible to the water heater with no obstructions; B. A Category III or IV vent, or a Type B vent with straight pipe between the outside termination and the space where the water heater is installed; C. A condensate drain that is no more than 2 inches higher than the base of the installed water heater, and allows natural draining without pump assist, D. A gas supply line with a capacity of at least 200,000 Btu/hr. §150.0(o): All dwelling units shall meet the requirements of ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2 Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low -Rise Residential Buildings. Window operation is not a permissible method of providing the Whole Building Ventilation required in Section 4 of that Standard. Pool and Spa Heating Systems and Equipment Measures: §110.4(a): Any pool or spa heating system shall be certified to have: a thermal efficiency that complies with the Appliance Efficiency Regulations; an on-off switch mounted outside of the heater; a permanent weatherproof plate or card with operating instructions; and , shall not use electric resistance heatin ora pilot light. §110.4(b)1: Any pool or spa heating equipment shall be installed with at least 36" of pipe between filter and heater, or dedicated suction and return lines, or built-up connections for future solar heating. 110.4(b)2: Outdoor pools ors as that have a heat pump or gas heater shall have'a cover. §110.4(b)3: Pools shall have directional inlets that adequately mix the pool water, and a time switch that will allow all pumps to be set or programmed to run only during off-peak electric demand periods. 150.0 : Residential pool systems ore ui ment meet the pump sizing, flow rate, pip6g,filters' nd valver-egu4mments of §150.0( Residential Lighting Measures: §150.0(k)1A: Installed luminaires shall be classified as high -efficacy or low -efficacy for con plia ctyifh 0. i a n e with TABLE 150.0-A or TABLE 150.0-B, as applicable. BUILDING & SAFETY -DEPT. 150.0 k 1 C: The wattage of permanently installed luminaires shall be determined ass ec fied b 1 50.0 k 1 D: Ballasts for fluorescent lams rated 13 Watts or greater shall be electronic a d shall - 0 kHz. §150.0(k)1 E: Permanently installed night lights and night lights integral to installed luminairDs or e h st ?9r)9`sT9Irl5dYaYed1ZrWnsume no more than five watts of power per luminaire or exhaust fan as determined in accordance with Section 130.0(c). Night lights shall not be required to be controlled by vacancy sensors. EnergyPro 6.3 by EnergySoft User Number. 8165 1 10763606 Panp 1.1 (n) MANDATORY MEASURES SUMMARY: Residential (Page 3 of 3 MF-1 R Project Name Date Hamilton Residence 1711412015 150.0 k 1 F: Lighting integral to exhaust fans, in rooms other than kitchens, shall meet the applicable requirements of §150.0(k). 150.0(k)2: All switching devices and controls shall meet the requirements of §150.0(k)2. §150.0(k)3: A minimum of 50 percent of the total rated wattage of permanently installed lighting in kitchens shall be high efficacy. EXCEPTION: Up to 50 watts for dwelling units less than or equal to 2,500 ft2 or 100 watts for dwelling units larger than 2,500 ft2 may be exempt from the 50 percent high efficacy requirement when all lighting in the kitchen is controlled in accordance with the applicable provisions in Section 150.0(k)2, and is also controlled by vacancy sensors or dimmers. §150.0(k)4: Permanently installed lighting that is internal to cabinets shall use no more than 20 watts of power per linear foot of illuminated cabinet. §150.0(k)5: Lighting installed in bathrooms shall meet the following requirements: A. A minimum of one high efficacy luminaire shall be installed in each bathroom; and B. All other lighting installed in each bathroom shall be high efficacy or controlled by vacancy sensors. §150.0(k)6: Lighting installed in attached and detached garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms shall be high efficacy luminaires and controlled by vacancy sensors. §150.0(k)7: Lighting installed in rooms or areas other than in kitchens, bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms shall be high efficacy, or shall be controlled by either dimmers or vacancy sensors. EXCEPTION 1: Luminaires in closets less than 70 square feet. EXCEPTION 2: Lighting in detached storage building less than 1000 square feet located on a residential site. §150.0(k)8: Luminaires recessed into insulated ceilings shall be listed fqr zero clearance insulation contact (IC) by Underwriters Laboratories or other nationally recognized testing/rating laboratory; and have a label that certifies the luminaire is airtight with air leakage less than 2.0 CFM at 75 Pascals when tested in accordance with ASTM E283; and be sealed with a gasket or caulk between the luminaire housing and ceiling. §150.0(k)9A: For single -family residential buildings, outdoor lighting permanently mounted to a residential building or other buildings on the same lot shall be high efficacy, or may be low efficacy if it meets all of the following requirements: i. Controlled by a manual ON and OFF switch that does not override to ON the automatic actions of items ii or iii below; and ii. Controlled by a motion sensor not having an override or bypass switch that disables the motion sensor, or controlled by a motion sensor having a temporary override switch which temporarily bypasses the motion sensing function and automatically reactivates the motion sensor within 6 hours iii. Controlled by one of the following methods: a. Photocontrol not having an override or bypass switch that disables the photocontrol; or b. Astronomical time clock not having an override or bypass switch that disables the astronomical time clock, and which is programmed to automatically turn the outdoor lighting OFF during daylight hours; or c. Energy management control system which meets all of the following requirements: At a minimum provides the functionality of an astronomical time clock in accordance with Section 110.9; meets the Installation Certification requirements in Section 130.4; meets the requirements for an EMCS in .Section 130.5; does not have an override or bypass switch that allows the luminaire to be always ON; and, is programmed to automatically turn the outdoor lighting OFF during daylight hours. §150.0(k)9A: For low-rise multi-family residential buildings, outdoor lighting for private patios, entrances, balconies, and porches; and outdoor lighting for residential parking lots and residential carports with less than eight vehicles per site shall comply with one of the following requirements: i. Shall comply with Section 150.0(k)9A; or ii. Shall comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 110.9, 130.0, 130.2, 130.4, 140.7, and 141.0. §150.0(k)9: For low-rise residential buildings with four or more dwelling units, outdoor lighting not regulated by Section 150.0(k)9B or Section 150.0(k)9D shall comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 110.9, 130.0, 130.2, 130.4, 140.7, and 141.0. §150.0(k)9D: Outdoor lighting for residential parking lots and residential carports with a total of eight or more vehicles per site shall comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 110.9, 130.0, 130.2, 130.4, 140.7, and 141.0. §150.0(k)10: Internally illuminated address signs shall comply with Section 140.8; OR not contain a screw-base socket, and consume no more than five watts of power as determined according to §130.0(d). §150.0(k)11: Lighting for residential parking garages for eight or more vehicles shall comply with the applicable requirements for nonresidential garages in Sections 110.9 1 1�A,"T �1 130.4, 140.6, and 141.0. V 1`� §150.0(k)12A. In a low-rise multi family residential building where the total interior common are in I b ' i e or less of the floor area, permanently installed lighting for the interior common areas in that buil 'ng�� i controlled by an occupant sensor. pp jj�� interior §150.0(k)12B. In a low-rise multi-family residential building where the total common area n a sin'fiiFn, 20 percent of the floor area, permanently installed lighting in that building shall: �R C� i. Comply with the applicable requirements in Sections 110.9, 130.0, 130.1, 140.6, and 1 1.0; afd ii. Lighting installed in corridors and stairwells shall be controlled by occupant sensors th t reduce the lighting piawr in eac space by at least 50 percent. The occupant sensors shall be capable of turning the light fully On a cb%l omjdpsic>ee7 p ingress and egress. EnergyPro 6.3 by EnergySoft User Number: 8165 /D: 63606 Page 14 of 14 Tv Iry x t � � _� �=t�f � . �,,�i fir, ., ..y,, ;.1,.�4sr ��.�, • � �,,ij°c V, 3_ _,w 4 W'Ulia'411 iireidlit �3� .s � ?fit lfl'. # Cr 41 .x.43:.' '{r 11��1��e �., �,,,.y��`• =f '7 Geo -Engi neers and Geol ogi sts ANDMARK 780 N. 4th Street EI Centro, CA 92243 ' Q:• . • • Q` • • • (760) 370-3000 (760) 337-8900 fax February 19, 2015 77-948 wildcat Drive ` Palm Desert, CA 92211 t (760) 360-0665• "(760) 360-0521 fax Mr. Mark" Howard ` BEH Properties, LLC: P.O. Box 10389- Palm 0389Palm Desert, CA"92255 Geotechnical Investigation { ' APNs 775-200-018-8 .; {La Quinta, California CITY OF ( I IV TA� LCI Report No. LP1500 BUILDING &.SAFETY DEPT, - FOR CONS UCTION ' Dear Mr. Howard: t DATE $J�e ' This geotechnical report is provided for design and construction of the pro sed single family' resident located at 55-487 Southern Hills, in La Quinta, California. The subject site is located within " the AREA.3'of the City of La Quinta, Engineering Bulletin #0903. Our geotechnical investigation was conducted in response to your request for our services. The , enclosed report describes our soil engineering investigation and presents :our professional opinions regarding geotechnical conditions at the site to be considered in'the'design and -construction of the project. The findings of this study indicate the site is underlain by Triter -bedded silty sand, sandy silt, and silty clay with near. surface silty sands and sandy silts. The near surface soils are expected to be non - expansive to slightly expansive. The subsurface soils are medium dense to dense in • nature. ' Groundwater was not encountered in the borings during the time of exploration. Severe sulfate. and chloride levels were not encountered in the soil samples tested for this study, but ' the soil is severely corrosive to metal. However, in consideration of general corrosive environment in the vicinity, it is recommended that concrete should use ype HN, cement with a maximum water - cement ratio of,0.5.0` and'a minim``umcompress ve,strength_of 4;000:psi.. ' Seismic settlements of the dry sands have been calculated to be less than 1/4 inch based on the field exploration data. Total seismic settlements are not expected to exceed 1/4 inch with differential settlements°approximately 1/2 of the total settlement. The settlement -from the collapse potential analysis was determined to be approximately 2.8 inches. The residential 'structure• should be ' designed to accommodate an estimated different settlement of a minimum of 1 inch over a distance _ of 40 feet (angular distortion of 1:480). APNs 775-200-018-8 - LCI- Report No. LP 15007 We did not encounter soil conditions that would preclude implementation of the.proposed project provided the recommendations contained in this report, are implemented iri the design and construction of this project: Our findings, recommendations, and application optiows are related only through reading the full report, and are best evaluated with the active participation of the engineer " ,of record who developed them. , ' We -apfindings preciate' the opportunity to* provide our and professional opinions regarding geotechnical conditions at the site:. If you have any questions or comments regarding our findings, please call our office at (760) 360=0665.; ' Respectfully Submitted, r - LauffAUrk Consultants, Inc.iFESRpN M • C No. C 34432 Greg 1VL' C Andra P.E., IVI:ASCE BOFi609-30-15 4_ Principal ginee r CRAL OF CA Distribution: , t Client (4) Y APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ....:..............:...................:.......:..:.............................:.......................................:. Section 1 ....... ......... 1 INTRODUCTION................................:.............................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Authorization Section2.......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION .......... :.......................................................... :...................... 3 2.1 Field Exploration .............................. ........................................................ ..........:.............. 3 2.2 Laboratory Testing..........................................................................................I................. 4 Section3................................................:...............................:....:.......::........................................... 5 DISCUSSION ............................... ..... ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Site Conditions ........................... 3.2 Geologic Setting ............... ....... ............. .......................................................... 5 3.3 Faulting............................................................................................................................ 6 3.4 General Ground Motion Analysis........................................................:.............:........:.... 7 3.5 Seismic and Other Hazards.............................................................:................................ 7 3.6 Subsurface Soil................................................................................................................ 8 3.7 Groundwater ..... ................................................................................................................ 9- 3.8 Seismic Settlement.............................................:.................:...::...................................... 9 3.9 Hydroconsolidation..................................................:..................................................... 10 3.10 Regional Subsidence..:................................................................................................. 10 Section4. ::..................................................................................................................................... 11 DESIGNCRITERIA.........................:.............:......................................................................... 11. 4.1 Site Preparation 4.2 Foundations and Settlements ......... :.......................... ...................................................... 13 4.3 Slabs -On -Grade ..................:............................:...................................:.......................... 14 4.4 Concrete Mixes and Corrosivity................................. .................... ............................... 15 4.5 Excavations....................................................................................................:.....:......::. 16 4.6 Lateral Earth Pressures................................................................................................... 16 4.7 Seismic Design-, .............:......................... 17 Section5................................................:....................:............................:..................................... 18 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES.................................................................. 18 5.1 Limitations.......................::....................................................:....................................... 18 5.2 Additional Services........................................................................................................ 19 APPENDIX A: Vicinity and Site Maps APPENDIX B: Subsurface Soil Logs and Soil Key APPENDIX C: Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX D: Seismic Settlement Calculations APPENDIX E: Collapse Potential Settlement Calculations APPENDIX F: References r APNs 775-200-018=8 LCI Report No. LP15007 Section l INTRODUCTION • 1.1 Project Description This reportpresents the findings of our geotechnical investigation for. the proposed single family resident located of 55-478 Southern Hills, in La.Quinta, California (See Vicinity Map, Plate A-1). The proposed development will consist of one-story single family residences on previously graded. lots.. Arsite. plan for the proposed development was not made available to, us at the time that this - report was prepared. .The structures are planned to consist of continuous wall and column concrete. footings, concrete slabs -,on -grades and wood -frame construction. Footing loads at exterior bearing walls are estimated at 1 to 5 kips per lineal foot. Column loads are estimated to range .from 5 to.40.kips. If structural loads exceed those stated above,. we should be notified so we may evaluate their impact on . foundation settlement and bearing capacity. Site development will include building pads preparation, underground utilities installation, concrete driveways and sidewalks -placement. 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of this geotechnical study was to investigate the upper 51::5 feet of subsurface soil at selected locations within the site for evaluation of physical/engineering properties. From the subsequent field and laboratory data, professional opinions were developed and are provided in this report regarding geotechnical conditions ai this site and the effect„on design and construction. The -scope of our services consisted of the following: ” < Field exploration and in-situ testing of the site soils at selected locations and depths. < Laboratory testing for physical and/or chemical properties of selected samples. < Review of the available -literature and publications pertaining to local geology, faulting, and seismicity. < Engineering analysis and evaluation of the data collected. < Preparation of this report presenting our findings and professional opinions regarding the geotechnical aspects of project design'and construction. LandMark Consultants; Inc: Page 1 APNs 775-20.0-01878 _ . , LCI Report No. LP 15007 ; This report addresses the following geotechnical parameters: r " : V Subsurface soil and groundwater. conditions e s y < Site geology, regional faulting,and seismicity, near source factors, and site seismic; accelerations. ; Liquefaction potential and its mitigation- ' < Ex_ pansive soil and methods of mitigation <' Aggressive soil conditions to metals and concrete Professional opinions with'regard to the above parameters are presented for the following t .• .. -,J w* • "( '(. •' , gid' s .: -• i. r• '. � _' ,�", •.. < Site grading' ana earthwork • �. '� < Building pad and foundation subgrade preparation <. Allowable soil bearing pressures and expected settlements +` <. Concrete slabs =on -grade < Lateral earth pressures < Excavation conditions and buried utility installations - G Mitigation of the potential effects of salt concentrations in native soil to concrete . mixes, and steel'reinforcement < Seismic design parameters. ' Our scope of work for -this report did not include an evaluation of the'site`fo"r the presence of - environmentally hazardous -materials or conditions. 1.3 Authorization Mr. Mark Howard of BEH Properties, LLC,,provided authorization, by.written agreement to proceed, with our work on January 15'2015.. We conducted our•work according to our written proposal dated January 14, 2015. " LandMark Consultants, Inc.Page 2 APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP15007 Section 2 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 2.1 .-Field Exploration Subsurface exploration was performed on February 3, 2015 using 2R Drilling of Ontario California ' to advance. a boring to depths of 51.5 feet below ekisting 'ground surface. The ,borings, were advanced with a truck -mounted, CME 75 drill rig using 8 -inch diameter, hollow -stem, continuous - flight augers.',The approximate boring locations were established in.the field and plotted on the site - map by . sighting to discernable site features. The boring locations are. shown on the Site' and Exploration Plan (Plate A-2). °. A staff engineer observed the drilling operations and maintained a log of the soil encountered and sampling depths, visually, classified the soil encountered during drilling.in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, and obtained drive tube and bulk samples of the subsurface materials at selected intervals.. Relatively undisturbed soil samples were retrieved using` a 2 -inch - outside diameter (OD) split -spoon sampler. or a 3 -inch OD Mod ified•California Split -Barrel (ring) sampler. The samples were obtained by driving the sampler ahead of the auger tip at selected depths. The drill rig was equipped with a 140 -pound CME automatic hammer with a 30 -:inch drop for conducting Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) in accordance with ASTM D1586. ' The number of blows required to drive the samplers the last 12 inches of an 18 inch drive length into the soil is recorded on the boring logs as "blows per foot Blow counts reported on the boring logs represent r the field blow counts. No corrections have. been -a lied for effects oft overburden pressure,. . PP automatic hammer drive energy, drill,rod lengths, line"rs,'and sampler•diameter. After loggi6g:and sampling the soil, the exploratory borings were backfilled with the excavated material. The backfill was loosely placed and was not compacted to the requirements specified for engineered fill. The subsurface logs are presented *on Plate B-1. in Appendix B. A key to. the log symbols is presented on Plate B-2. The stratification lines shown on. the subsurface logs represent' the approximate boundaries between the various strata. However, the transition from one stratum to another may -be gradual over some range of depth: LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page.3 APNs 775-200=018-8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 2.2 Laboratory Testing ' .Laboratory tests were conducted on selected bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples to aid i.n classification and evaluation of selected engineering properties of the site soils.. ThLtests were ` conducted in generalconformanceto the procedures of the American. Society for Testing and . Materials (ASTM) "or, other standardized methods as referenced- below. The laboratory testing iprogram consisted of the following tests: ' < ; Particle;'Size' Analyses (ASTM D422) — used for5,soil classification and liquefaction evaluation. Unit Dry Densities (ASTM D2937) and Moisture Contents (ASTM D2216) —used for in= situ soil parameters. Collapse Potential (ASTM D5333) - used for hydroconsolidatiori potential evaluation., < Moisture=DensiiyRelationship (ASTM D1557) -used for soil.compaction determinations. Chemical Analyses (soluble sulfates & chlorides, pH, and resistivity) (Caltrans. Methods) — used for concrete mix evaluations and corrosion protection requirements. The laboratory test results. are presented on- the *subsurface logs and ori. Plates C=1. through C-4 in Appendix C:>.� - Engineering parameters of'soil strength, compressibility and relative density utilized'for developing design criteria provided within 'this report were obtained from the field 'and laboratory testing program.. f LandMark Consultants,Inc. Page 4 APNs 775-200-01878 LCI Report No. LP 15007 Section 3 DISCUSSION ' 3.1 Site Conditions S.The project site is trapezoid -shaped inplan-view,',is relataivelY flat -lying and consists of approximately 0.2 acres of vacant land:, The site is bounded by Southern -Hills, a paved residential= street to the north, existing single family residential homes to the east and .west, and a golf course to the south. The project site consists of previously graded lots. Adjacent properties are flat -lying and are approximately at the same elevation with this site:'. The project site lies at an elevation of approximately 10 feet below mean sea level (MSL) in the Coachella Valley region of the California low desert. Annual rainfall in this and region is less than 4 inches pe`r year with four months of average summertime temperatures above 100°F. Winter temperatures are mild, seldom reaching freezing. 3.2, Geologic Setting The project site is located in the Coachella Valley portion of ,the Salton Trough physiographic province. The Salton Trough is a geologic structural depression resulting from large scale regional 1 faulting: The trough is bounded on the northeast by the San Andreas.Fault and Chocolate Mountains and the southwest by the Peninsular Range and faults of the San Jacinto Fault Zone. The Salton ' Trough represents the northward extension of the Gulf of California, containing both marine and non -marine sediments 'since the Miocene Epoch. Tectonic activity that formed the trough continues , at a high rate as evidenced by,deformed young sedimentary deposits and high levels of seismicity. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to regional faults and physiographic features. iThe surrounding regional geology includes. the Peninsular Ranges (Santa Rosa and San Jacinto' Mountains) to the south and west, the Salton Basin to the southeast, and the Transverse Ranges (Little San Bernardino and,Orocopia Mountains) to the north and'east. Hundreds of feet to several thousand feet_ of Quaternary fluvial; lacustrine, -and aeolian soil deposits underlie the Coachella Valley. i LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 5 APNs 775-200=018-8 { LCI Report,No. LP 15007 The southeastern part of the Coachella Valley lies below sea level. In the; geologic past, the ancient Lake Cahuilla submerged the area. Calcareous tufa deposits may be observed along the ancient shoreline as high as elevatron 45 to 50 feet MSL along the Santa Rosa Mountains,from'LA Quinta southward.-Lacustrine (lake bed) depositscomprise the subsurface, soils -over much of the eastern, Coachella Valley with!alluvial outwash along the flanks of the valley. 3.3 Faulting V �40 . The project site is located in the seismically active Coachella Valley of southern. California with ' numerous mapped faults of;the San Andreas Fault System. traversing the'region.� The San Andreas, ". Fault System'is comprised of the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault Zones in southern California. We have performed a computer-aided search of known faults or seismic zones that lie within a 62 mile (100 kilometer) radius of the project site .(Table 1): A fault map illustrating known active faults relative. to the site is presented on Figure, 1, Regional Fault Map., Figure -2 -shows the project site in relation to, local faults. The criterion for, fault classification; adopted. by the California Geological Survey defines Earthquake Fault Zones,along active or potentially active faults. An active fault is one that has ruptured,during Holocene time (roughly within, the last'l,l„ 000 yea'rs). A•fault that has ruptured during the last E8 million years (Quaternary time), but has not been proven by direct evidence to have not moved within Holocene ' time is considered to be potentially active..A fault that, has not moved during Quaternary time is considered to be inactive. Review of the„current Alquist=Priolo Earthquake Fault Zon&maps'(CGS, 2000a) .indicates' that the'nearest mapped' Earthquake Fault Zone is -the°San Andreas'.— San Bernardino Mountain fault located approximately 4:8 miles north east of the project site. c f+ ' LandMark Consultants Inc. : ' Page 6 BEH Properties LCI Project No. LP15007. Table 1 Summary of Characteristics of Closest Known Active Faults r Fault Name Approximate Distance (miles) Approximate Distance (km) Maximum Moment Magnitude Mw Fault Length (km) Slip Rate • (mm/yr) San Andreas - San Bernardino (South) 4.7 7.5 7.4 103 ± 10 30 ± 7 Garnet Hill * 5.0 8.1" San Andreas - San Bernardino (North) 7.0 l 1.2' 7.5 103 ± 10 24 ± 6 San Andreas - Coachella 10.2 16.3 7.2 96 ± 10 25.± 5 Indio Hills * 10.7 17.1 t Blue Cut * 12.6 20.2 Eureka Peak 13.4 21.4 6.4 19 ± 2 0.6 ± 0.4 Burnt Mtn. 19.1 30.5 6.5 21 ± 2 0.6 ± 0.4 San Jacinto - Anza 19.9 31.9 7.2 91 ± 9 12 ± 6 Morongo * 20.4 32.7 'Pinto Mtn. 22.4 35.8 7.2 74 ± 7 2.5 ± 2 San Jacinto - Coyote Creek 23.0 36.9 6.8 41 +_' 4 4 ± 2 Landers 26.4 42.3 7.3 83 ± 8 0.6 ± 0.4 San Jacinto - San Jacinto Valley 30.2 48.4 , 6.9 43 ± 4 12 ± 6 Pisgah Mtn. - Mesquite Lake 33.1 52.9 7.3 89 ± 9' 0.6 ± 0.4 Johnson Valley (northern) 35.8 57.2 6.7 35 ± 4 0.6 ± 0.4' S. Emerson - Copper Mtn. 36.1 57.8' -7 54 ± 5 0.6 ± 0.4 North Frontal Fault Zone - Eastern ' 36.8 58.9 6.7 27 ± 3 0.5 ± 0.3 Lenwood - Lockhart - Old Woman Springs 41.4 • 66.3 7.5 145 ± 15 0.6 ± 0.4 Hot Springs * 41.6 66.5 San Jacinto - Borrego 42.2 67.5 6.6 29 ± 3 4 ± 2. Calico -Hidalgo' 42.5 68.0 7.3 95+10 * Note: Faults not included in CGS database. Malley. t a-' Lancaster Clipt Mountains' . almdale�.� <'-• �,, WilfdemessAree `hake _ i V�ctoroillew aa� Havasu City .Hey .Lake Hava t be►Sldeo, LU�Re r .., • . r, r - Al -A ong4A c o r" h�tn, ov ine 3each Mission' " f5 0. IT - CC-a41,SI ' '64s 'E 21111ta Sdt�t i 20 mi>_ :: State Park �,,,� .'+►!'�rdr:. 'r^.., k `'� !�e �,�� S �' �' : ��` r� i ? �{� •,� •� � ` -•j:ei pad � r _ r • .,,te riti Park a 13 �1 • } j a •. �'.�' in f .- .r e �+ 1o'si�ua free r } �� ` � 'ay,�pApj'V�atkr..wrr a .r* �r. •�`"3 ;i { f'- ' R' ,t Desert °al ,- : ` Hemea :fs-' 100.. y rt - Hlyth� j - ri � �.�� .} c, ,��, �.r"moi# �.1 ,.rte S�a�°• - r�fr� � � �� SL 4. ad Escb-.hbido d.'. c �. � : r�. - � �. .� . � - • � � tr✓iltllife Neiu_g a .f bf r r r `}� r ..} . �� .�wx•` ,F $4, j ay Santee' �s= i r f yY r't.. O Irl halon +v _~ • S'' ,SI..r .: .�"' .. a El Centr _ Yurria. 4y t 'sem ,s �' `.�` -• _ --, '-.Mexicali"- a Stamp`-,� ,Tecate St'„� , : o;'Municipality - ti rSan Luis a ` �a Source: California Geological Survey 2010 Fault Activity Map of California http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html# LANDMARK Geo-Engitieers and Geologists Project No.: LP15007 Regional Fault Map Figure 1 ti.i. r r ': ..sfi 'J____ tri ' . r J;. f `: .�•i!'S .µ -iY.' A1MOf0 ! A' . _ �.� jd,Q'Ir"t' �, .ty� y� rj;P� _ _ Y}`Cr�� .,.1 �s �T -., 1W{J },�+�i •;"j 'p�;. �: '�d 62 CR Sp .r"'gR"V`� f 4.1 M $en. �iPa�m �a ,,j!�'h aas t- ailptro"' �,. �" A Thousa - - . ` . �;. + -� N " Ir ej;� ,J�f u .u� ;Spr rings ' 1 =palms " _ �� srvr ow---- Jaci11 oA C ineilwdd-Pi,uDunesVisiad€rE".t��'^'►� xn�?C4ve . r r ;Psim,Deseit� T Indli z�.a ;,fir-` Valley Dake>�� ;,.� �a ?a Communis `Park, - y Coachella - 1. La Qum"& �' ;rc Ct xitp.�'. 7hefmalp �X,� --Mecca #"#s ,N +' -,tc '� �]�► Klh .�_..S ak, ��. ,'�T��'�j} r �+ x11,. Source: California Geological Survey 2010 Fault Activity Map of California http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/f`aultactivitymap.html# LANDMARK Project No.: LP15007 Map of Local Faults Figure S EXPLANATION . ' • Fault traces on land we indicated by solid tines where well located. by dashed fines where appmtdmet y ' located or Interred, and by dotted Wes where concealed by younger, roam or by lakes or bays. Fault baces Before are queded where continuation or existence is uncertain. 0oncealedfaulba in the Great Valley are based on 1 maps of selected subsurface horizons, co locations shown are sppmtdmate and may indicate structural / 4 trend only. All offshore faults based on sesndc reflection profile records are shown as solid ilnes where well 1 defined, dashed where inferred, queried where uncertain. Symbol FAULT CLASSIFICATION COLOR CODE Scale " (Indimtrag RerJmcy of Movement) - Fault along which historic past 2(10 years) dispfacemem has ocaured and is associated with one or more 1 1 1 1 of the f rgowing . f 1 1 i 1 1 . (Also included are e well-defined surface breaks It, (a) a recorded earthquake with surface rupturesom caused by ground shaking during earthquakes, e.g. extensive ground breakage, not on the White VM _ 1 1 fault caused by the ArvWTeteNapl earthquake of 1052). The dale of the associated earthquake is ' IuMcated Where repeated surface rupwres on the same fault have occurred. only the date of the latest 1 1 movement may be indicated, especially if eadia reports are not wall documented as to location of ground i breaks. S EXPLANATION . ' • Fault traces on land we indicated by solid tines where well located. by dashed fines where appmtdmet y ' located or Interred, and by dotted Wes where concealed by younger, roam or by lakes or bays. Fault baces Before are queded where continuation or existence is uncertain. 0oncealedfaulba in the Great Valley are based on Recency maps of selected subsurface horizons, co locations shown are sppmtdmate and may indicate structural / 4 trend only. All offshore faults based on sesndc reflection profile records are shown as solid ilnes where well Time defined, dashed where inferred, queried where uncertain. Symbol FAULT CLASSIFICATION COLOR CODE Scale " (Indimtrag RerJmcy of Movement) - Fault along which historic past 2(10 years) dispfacemem has ocaured and is associated with one or more ON LAND of the f rgowing . f . (Also included are e well-defined surface breaks It, (a) a recorded earthquake with surface rupturesom caused by ground shaking during earthquakes, e.g. extensive ground breakage, not on the White VM _ -VQhsimk timo(o.96ennnotoa colo 1916). fault caused by the ArvWTeteNapl earthquake of 1052). The dale of the associated earthquake is ' IuMcated Where repeated surface rupwres on the same fault have occurred. only the date of the latest _ movement may be indicated, especially if eadia reports are not wall documented as to location of ground i breaks. ' u (b) fault amp slippage - slow ground displacement usually without ac ammm0ng earthquakes.' (0) displaced survey Ones. A triangle to the right or left of the data indoores tenninebon pant of obsmved surface displacement Solid red Mangle Indicates known location d rupbumtemdrebon point Open black Mangle indicates uncertain or w estimated location of rupture termination point . � • Date bracketed by Mangles indmes local fault break =oW e1.eU;naeex sclmerta No Mangle by date indicates an intemedale point along fault break r Fault that exNtis fault creep, slippage. Hadmres indicae linear talent of fault aceP Annotation (seep • with leader) indicates representative locations whore fault asap has been observed and recorded - Square on fault Indicates where fault amp sfippspe has occurred thal has been Mggared by an eaNquake, '�xa onsome Other fault Das of wusebve eartquake indicated. Squares to right and left of date lndcas tam* we is o Mpoints between which triggered map slippage has cc—.d low other continuous or Intermittent Fnu �vg�.�fnruc cayox cats 4:o I between these end points). •____',;;,,.a.. ' Holocene fault displacement (owing past 11,700 years) without historic record Geanorphtc evidence for Holeoene fewh ing includes seg pmnda, scarps shorang little erosion, or the following feawres,in Holocene age deposits: offset eVwm courses, linear amps. snulter dogee, ars triangular faceted spurs. Recenq' • i of faulting offshore is based on the interpreted age of the youngest strate displaced by faulting. _---......a.. Late Ouatemery cult displacement (during past 700,000 years). Geomorphic evidence similar to that described for Holocene faults except features we less distinct Faulting may be younger, but tette of . . younger werlying deposits precludes more accurate age classification. „—_--........a.... Quaternary fault (age undigerentiated). Most tarots of this category show widence of displacement some- - fime during the past 1.6 million years: posstbre exceptions are fault which displace rods of undifererd* sled Pilo-Pleismcene age. Unnumbered Qlatemrry faults were based on Fault Map of CalManl , 1875. See Bulletin 201, Appendb D for source data ----.......a.. Pre-Quatemary fault (older that 1.6 million years) or fault without recognized Quaternary , iI displacement Some fetus am shown in this category bemuse the source of mapping tied was t of recatnatssnce nasm, or was not done with the abject of daring fault displacements. Faults _ in fns category are not necessarily inactive. — r ADDfITONAL FAULT SYMBOLS Ba and ball on dowaMrown side (relative or apparent). • "____,,,,,_,x„ Arrows along fault Indies relative or apparent direction of lateral movement , i__—.......a.. Arnow on fault indicates dredfon A dip . .' _ _. .. La. angle fault (barbs on upper plate). Fault surface generally dips less than 45• but locally may have been suasepuemy steepened. On offslrom faults. barba simply indicate a rweme fault regardless Of steepness .. adip t OTHER SYMBOLS j� Numbers refers, annotations fisted in the appenclices of the accompanying report Annotations include fault name, age Or fault dsplacement and pertinent references lndudng Earthquake Fault Zane maps wherea —L __..a ....... fault has been zoned by the Algals[-Prido Earthquake Fault Zoning Act This Act requires the Stas Geolo- roto as9mx r«I;s a gist to degneate, zones to encompass faults with Holocere displacement Structural discontinuity (offshore) separating differing Neogene structural domains. May Indicate dscom* nuddes between basement rocks. 1+ • B.Wey Seismic Zone, a linear one of seismicity locally up to 10 Ian wide associated with the releasing undnaranthtod atioFmcmmno stop between the Impeded and San Andress faults. . t,60D,000'• FeJb wSvaramy�a4 F9upmm strum olPawoor Q ��. e • - - .6t-0 dro ' Nry tbin�ocrosi� �ie F�po. 1 v �i , 4s comm ' , 4 (Aga of EOM) V.a •Oucmm, rocas wdradm o>6ermgb 26w(wbam mtf Wbvns,2009). Ommrrory ftmOft map.waovabWod usiq coo ' '\y Pedou lb lm smite. .. Years DESCRIPTTON ' Geologic Before Fault Recency / 4 Time Present Symbol of Scale ' (Apprgx) Movement ON LAND OFFSHORE r -VQhsimk timo(o.96ennnotoa colo 1916). � _ --� i Iromaea emaa of Rrpnn laNaaep. , �3• 200'm C' - DS:.<a:onani Cl'✓y1 M;bca.•c =oW e1.eU;naeex sclmerta ,y6y .a tt.o �• � suave d-1C:•renc wa, ' . Fnu �vg�.�fnruc cayox cats 4:o I Fauu: maalvc gnwxa , o9e: • �, a ,;� t 700.ItOD Un9riAeE Owmrmry mJh • moslhJbm Nb w�a�ry stir. FaJt cul sumo of puamrnary ops. � a � t — arlearcoonc pato axm9 , cow met t.mb,o0a y,an:, pesSS'a axpaons are hub a roto as9mx r«I;s a undnaranthtod atioFmcmmno ' . t,60D,000'• FeJb wSvaramy�a4 F9upmm strum olPawoor Q ��. e • - - .6t-0 dro ' Nry tbin�ocrosi� �ie F�po. 1 v �i , 4s comm ' r .ti I / 4 t 1 r ' APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 1 A I y 3.4' General Ground Motion Analysis ' The project site is considered likely to be subjected. to moderate to strong ground motion from earthquakes in the region. , Ground motions are dependent primarily on the earthquake magnitude ' and distance to the seismogenic (rupture) zone. Accelerations also are dependent upon attenuation t by rock and soil deposits, direction of rupture and type of fault; therefore, ground motions may vary considerably in the same`general area. ' CBC General Ground Motion Parameters: The 2013 CBC general ground motion parameters are based on the Risk -Targeted. Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER).' The U.S. Geological Survey "U.S. Seismic Design Maps Web Application" (USGS, 2014) was used'to obtain the site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration parameters: The site soils have been classified as Site Class D (stiff soil profile). Design spectral response acceleration Parameters are defined as the earthquake ground motions that are two thirds (2/3) of the corresponding MCER ground motions. Design earthquake ground motion parameters are provided in Table 2. A Risk Category II.was determined using Table 1604.5 and the Seismic Design Category is 4 D since S i, is less than 0.75. The Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCEG) peak ground acceleration (PGAM) value was determined from the "U.S. Seismic Design Maps Web Application" (USGS, 2013),for liquefaction' and seismic settlement analysis in accordance with 2013 CBC Section 1803.5.12 and ' CGS Note 48 (PGAM = FPCA*PGA). A PGAM value of 0.68g is used for liquefaction settlement' analysis. 3.5 Seismic and Other Hazards ► Groundshaking. The primary seismic hazard at the project site is the potential for strong groundshaking during earthquakes along the 'San Andreas , fault. A further discussion of groundshaking follows in`Section'3.4. P. Surface Rupture. The project site does. not lie within a State of California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or County of Riverside Earthquake Fault Zone. Surface fault rupture is 1 considered to be unlikely at the project site because of the well -delineated fault lines through the LandMark Consultants,. Inc. Page 7 - - • • - Design Response Spectra MCER Response Spectra i 11 1 16-M ff-TTImp PL, BEH Properties . y '` . LCI Project No. LP 15007 . Table 2 1.1 2013 California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE 7-10 Seismic Parameters 0.13 1.00 CBC Reference Soil Site Class: D Table 20.3-1 Latitude: 33.6460 N Longitude: -116.2570 W. 1 Risk Category: 11 ■ ■YYYYY ■■YYYYYI\YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. Seismic Design Category: D 0.8 1 ■ YYYYYt•�\OYYYYYOYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOYYYYY. ■ YYYYYY�'YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. ■.��YYYY��Y��YYYYYYYYYY��Y�YYYYYYY��■ -:Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) Ground Motion 0.9 0.70 1.06 Mapped MCEo Short Period Spectral Response SS 1.500 g Figure 1613.3.1(1) Mapped MCER i second Spectral Response St' 0.634 g Figure 1613.3.1(2) Short.Period (0.2 s) Site Coefficient Fe 1.00 Table 1613.3.3(1) Long Period (1.0 s) Site Coefficient F, 1.50 Table 1613.3.3(2) MCEo Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter (0.2 s) SMS 1.500 g = Fa * SS Equation 16-37! MCEo Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter (1.0 s) SMI 0.951 g = F„ * SI Equation 16-38 Design Earthquake Ground -Motion 0.53 0.79 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter'(0.2#s) SDs 1.000 g = 2/3*SMs Equation 16-39 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter (1.0 s) SDI 0.634 g = 2%3*SM; Equation 16-40 1 • vi Tt, 8.00 sec ASCE Figure 22-12 ` To 0.13 sec =0.2*SDI/SDS �YYYYYY��YYYYYYYYY■ YYYYY\��YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. � � YY YYYY YY\'Y �YY Y � � \�O YY�Y�� YYY Ts 0.63 sec =SD1/SDS Peak Ground Acceleration,-, PGAM 0.55 g _ ASCE Equation 11.8-1 - - • • - Design Response Spectra MCER Response Spectra i 11 1 16-M ff-TTImp PL, 111 141 1.1 0.13 1.00 1.50 ■Y.Y.�YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ ■r----7YYYYYYYYY.Y.YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ 0.63 11 1.50 ■■�S�Y\��YYYYY��YYYYYYYYYYYYYY�YYYYYYY■ ■■YYYY.�YYYYYYYYY��YYYYYYYYYYY��YYYYYYY■ . ■YYYY■ YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYAYYYY. 1 1 ■ ■YYYYY ■■YYYYYI\YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. .YY®YYYYYYY.YO.YYYSYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ 0.8 1 ■ YYYYYt•�\OYYYYYOYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOYYYYY. ■ YYYYYY�'YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. ■.��YYYY��Y��YYYYYYYYYY��Y�YYYYYYY��■ 0.9 0.70 1.06 ■IYYY��Y1\YYYY��YYYYYYYYYYY��YYYYYY��■ ■IYYYYYYY\1YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.1.01 �IYY��Y��YYY��YYYYYYYYYYYY��YYYYYYYY■ 0.63 1 1 11■I�+YYYYY�\YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■1 1 Ir�rYYl\YY�`YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. 1 1 I�iYYYY\'YYY.�YYYYYYYYYYYYYVYYSYYYYYYYYYYY. IlYmmmm �YY\�YYYY�Y��YYYYYYYYYYY��YYYYYY■ 1 0.53 0.79 ■Y��S�Y�YY��YYYYYYYY��YY��YYY��■ 1 ' fYYYYYYi7�YY\�YYY��YYYYYYYYY�v��YYYYYYY■ IiYYYYYYYSYYY,\YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOYYYYYY■ 1 0.53 0.79 IIYYYYYYYYYYY\�YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. YYYYYYYYY.�YYY\�YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ wYYYYYYYa►�YYYY .YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ 1 0.45 0.68 1 • vi mmmmmmmammmmYm" Y�i�iYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. 0.42. 0.63 ■YYYY�YYYYYOY�� ■YYYYYYYYYYYL ■YY �YYYYYY��YYYYYYYYY■ YYYYY\��YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. � � YY YYYY YY\'Y �YY Y � � \�O YY�Y�� YYY Y Y YYY ■ 1 1 1■YYYYYYYYYYYYYtlYYYYY\MOKS7-YYYYYYYYYYYYY■ ■YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYc\�Y.48 ■YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY\�7YYYiYY��_ YYY��_ 002YYYYYYYYYY■.54 �YYOO��Y■ 11 1 1 ■YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY��YYYYYYY��Y�Y�Y. .YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYrYC�YYYYYYYY�� _ �� 1 0.29 0.43 1 YYYYYYYYYYYYYO•YYYYYYYYYYYY�iYOr��YYYYYYY� ■YYYYYYYYYYYSYYYYYYYYYYYYYOYYYYYYYIC�YYI�I�I1 .YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYr • 1 0.40 ■YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY■ ■�YYYYYY��YYYYYY��YYYYYYYYYROMYYYY■ •1 0.24 1 :1 1 1 .34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 .32 1 0.18 1 .27 11 1 . 1 .24 - - • • - Design Response Spectra MCER Response Spectra i 11 APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP15007 Coachella Valley as shown on USGS and CDMG maps. However, because of, the high teIctonic activity and deep alluvium of the region, we cannot preclude the potential for surface rupture on undiscovered or new faults that may underlie the site. , ► Liquefaction. Liquefaction is unlikely to be a potential hazard at the site, since the groundwater is ' deeper than.50.feet (the maximum depth that liquefactionis known to occur). Other Potential Geologic Hazards. ► Landsliding. The hazard of landsliding is unlikely due to the regional planar topography. No ancient landslides are shown"on geologic maps of the region and no indications of;landslides were observed during pur site investigation. ' ► Volcanic hazards. The site is not.located in proximity to any known volcanically active area and - the risk of volcanic hazards is considered very low. ► Tsunamis, sieches, and flooding. The site does not lie near any large bodies of water, so the threat of tsunami,, sieches,. or other seismically -induced flooding is unlikely. ' ► Expansive soil. The near surface soilg�at the project.site consist of silty sand and'sandy.silt which are expected to be non -expansive to slightly expansive in nature. We recommend expansion testing' of the soils- in the upper layer during the rough grading operations to determine the expansive. characteristic of these.•soils. F 3.6 Subsurface Soil _ ' Subsurface soils encountered during the field exploration conducted on February 3, 2013 consist of w dominantly medium dense to very dense inter -bedded, silty sand (SM) sandy silt (ML) and sand/silty sands (SP/SM), to the maximum depth of exploration. The near, surface soils are expected to be non - expansive to slightly expansive in nature. The -subsurface logs (Plate B-1.) depict the stratigraphic relationships of the various soil types. .:.. r LandMark Consultants; Inc. Page 8 APNs 775-200-01,878 LCI Report No. LP 15007 3.7 Groundwater Groundwater was.not encountered in the borings during the time of exploration. According to . Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) readings of groundwater levels from nearby wells, ' r groundwater is located at a depth of approximately 162 to 176 feet below the ground surface in the vicinity of the project site. ' Based on the regional topography, groundwater flow'-is assumed to be generally towards the south- east within the site area. Flow directions may.vary locally in the vicinity of the site. ' Historic groundwater records in the vicinity of the project site indicate that.groundwater has fluctuated between 60 to 105 feet'below the ground surface over the last 60 .years according to a ' report "Coachella Valley Investigation" conducted by the Department of Water Resources, published July 1964. 3.8 Seismic Settlement „ An evaluation, of the non-liquefaction seismic settlement potential was performed using the relationships developed by Tokimatsu and Seed (1984, 1987) for dry sands. This .method is an t empirical approach to quantify seismic settlement using SPT blow.counts.and PGA estimates from ' the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis... ' . The soils beneath the site consist primarily of medium dense to dense silty., sands and loose to " medium dense sandy silts. Based on the empirical relationships, total induced settlements are. estimated to be on the order of 1/2 inch in the event of a MCE earthquake. Thexesidential structure should be designed to accommodate an estimated different settlement of a minimum of 1 inch over a distance of 40 feet (angular distortion of 1:480). ' The computer printouts for the estimates of induced settlement are included in Appendix D. LandMark Consultants, Inc. _ Page 9 APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 ' 3.9 Hydro -consolidation, - ,. In arid. climatic regions, granular •soil's have a potential to collapse upon wetting. This collapse (hydro -consolidation) phenomena is the result of the lubrication of soluble cements (carbonates) in the soil matrix causing the soil to densify from its loose configuration during deposition. ' Collapse potential test (Plate C-3) performed on relatively undisturbed "sample from the site indicated a slight risk of collapse upon saturation. In general, the soils consist of dominantly medium dense to ' very dense inter -bedded silty sand (SM), sandy. silt (ML), and 'sand/silty sands , (SP/SM) to ,the maximum depthr'of exploration. The settlement from the collapse potential analysis was determined to be approximately 2.8 inches to a depth of 29 feet. The computer printout fof the. estimate of collapse potentialsettlement is included in Appendix E of this report .3.10 Regional Subsidence The project is located in the Coachella Valley which has experienced up to 12 inches of regional subsidence between 1996 and 2005 (USGS, 2007). The risk of regional subsidence at the'project site -is considered moderate.:The•project site is located in Riverside County designated area of. active . ' subsidence (Plate A-5). +, - - LandMark Consultants, Inca Page 10 t ' APNs 775-200-018!.81.' LCI Report No. LP 15007 ' Section 4 DESIGN CRITERIA 4.1 Site Preparation 'Pre -grade Meeting: Prior to site preparation, a meeting should be held at the site with as a minimum, g � P P � g .. the owner's representative, grading contractor and geotechnical,engineer in attendance. Clearing and Grubbing_ All surface improvements, debris and vegetation including,grass, trees; and ' weeds on the site at the time of construction should be removed from the construction area. ,Root balls should be.completely excavated. Organic stripping should be hauled from the site and not used" as fill. Any trash, construction debris', concrete slabs, old pavement, landfill, and buried obstructions such as oldfoundations and utility lines exposed during rough grading should be traced to the limits ' of the foreign materials and removed. Any excavations resulting from site clearing and grubbing should be dish -shaped to the lowest depth of disturbance and backfilled with engineered fill. Building Pad Preparation:. The exposed surface soil.withm the proposed building pad areas should. be removed to 36 inches below the lowest foundation grades, extending five feet beyond all exterior wall/column lines (including adjacent concrete areas). The exposed sub -grade shall be.saturated to a ' minimum depth of 48 inches and compacted with a vibratory steel drum roller to achieve a minimum compaction -of .95% of the maximum dry density. Moisture penetration.and compaction should be ' verified prior to construction of the engineered fill pad. After achieving the recommended compaction, the engineered building pad may be constructed by 1 placing the removed soils in uniformly -moisture conditioned to at least 2% over optimum moisture, ' and re, compacted to at least 90% of ASTM D1557 maximum density The on-site,soils are suitable for use as compacted fill and utility trench backfill. ,Imported fill soil r if re uired should similar to -onsite soil or non -expansive, granular soil meeting the USCS classifications of SM, SP -SM, or SW -SM with a maximum rock size of 3 inches. The geotechnical engineer should approve imported fill soil sources before,hauling material to the site. Native and imported materials should be placed in lifts no greater than 8.inches in loose thickness, uniformly moisture conditioned to ±2% over optimum moisture, and re -compacted to at least 90% of ASTM D1557 maximum density. a LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 11 ' APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 tIn areas other than the building pad which are to receive concrete slabs and asphalt concrete pavement, -the ground surface should be over -excavated to a depth of 12 inches, uniformly moisture ' conditioned to ±2% of optimum moisture, and re -compacted to at least 90% of ASTM D 1557 maximum- density. Trench Backfill: On-site soil free,of debris, vegetation, and other deleterious matter may be suitable ' for use `as utility trench backfill. Backfill within roadways should be placed in layers not more that 6 inches in thickness, uniformly moisture conditioned to ±2% of optimum moisture. and mechanically ' compacted to a minimum of 90% of the ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density except for the top 12 inches of the trench which shall be compacted to at least 95%. Native backfill should only be placed and compacted after encapsulating buried pipes with suitable bedding'and pipe envelope material. Pipe envelope/bedding should either, be clean sand (Sand Equivalent SE>30) or crushed rock when encountering groundwater. A geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to encapsulate the crushed rock to reduce the potential for in -washing of fines into the gravel void space. Precautions should be taken in the compaction of the backfill to avoid damage to the pipes and structures. Moisture Control and Drainage: The moisture condition of the building pad should be maintained ' during trenching and. utility installation until concrete is placed or should be rewetted before initiating delayed construction. If soil drying is noted, a 2 to 3 inch depth of water may be used in ' the bottom of footings to restore footing. subgrade moisture and reduce. potential edge lift. ' Adequate site drainage is essential to future performance of the project. Infiltration of.excess irrigation water and stormwaters can adversely affect the performance of the subsurface soil at the ' site. Positive drainage should be maintained away from all structures (5% for 5 feet minimum across unpaved areas) to prevent ponding and subsequent saturation of the native soil. Gutters and ' downspouts may be considered as a means to convey water away from foundations.. If landscape irrigation is allowed next to the building, drip irrigation systems or lined planter boxes should be ' used. The subgrade soil should be maintained in a moist, but not saturated state, and not allowed to dry out. Drainage should be maintained without ponding. LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 12 r, APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No. LP15007 Observation and Density Testing: All site preparation and fill placement should be continuously observed and tested by a representative of -a qualified geotechnical engineering firm. Full-time r, observation services during the excavation .and scarification process is necessary to detect undesirable materials or conditions and soft areas that may be encountered in the construction area. The geotechnical firm that provides observation and testing during construction shall assume the. responsibility of "geotechnical engineer of record." and, as such, shall perform additional tests and. investigation as necessary to satisfy themselves as to the site conditions and the recommendations'for site development. Auxiliary Structures Foundation Preparation: Auxiliary structures such as free standing or retaining walls should have the existing soil beneath the structure foundation. prepared in'the manner recommended for.the building pad except the preparation needed only to extend 18 inches below and beyond the footing. } 4.2 lFoundations''and Settlements Shallow column footings and continuous wall footings are suitable to support the structures provided. they are founded on a layer of properly prepared and compacted soil as described in Section 4.1. The foundations may be designed using an allowable-sso �beare iiiig;pssure of-1;800-psf! The allowable soil pressure may_be'ihcreased by20% for each -foot of embedment_depth in'excess of,18 inches -and by one -third -for short term loads induced by winds or seismic events. The maximum allowable soil pressure at increased embedment depths sliall not:exceed,2___3sp�f. All exterior and interior foundations should be rembedded-a -miniin6ir--'of-.l-$`-inches below the building support pad or lowest adjacent final grade, whichever is deeper.; Continuous wall footings should have a mini`mumwidth-of-12 inches: Column footings should have a minimum width_of24 'inches -and should not be structurally isolated. Recommended concrete reinforcement and sizing for all footings should be provided by -the structural engineer. Resistance to horizontal loads will be developed by passive earth pressure on the sides of footings ' and frictional resistance developed along the bases of footings and concrete slabs. Passive resistance to lateral earth pressure may be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure of 220 pcf to resist t LandMark Consultants,,Inc. Page 13 APNs 775-200-018=8 LCI Report No. LP 15007 lateral loadings. The top one foot of embedment should not be considered in computing passive' resistance unless the adjacent area is confined by a slab or pavement. An allowable friction ' coefficient of 0.31 may also be used at the base of the footings to resist lateral loading. ' Foundation movement under the estimated static (non -seismic) loadings'andstatic site conditions are estimated to not exceed 3/a inch with differential movement of about two-thirds of total movement for ' the loading assumptions stated above when the subgrade preparation guidelines given above are followed. Foundation movements, under the seismic loading due to dry, settlement are provided in ' . Section 3.8 of this report. Foundation -movements under the collapse potential settlement" are provided in Section 3.9 of this report. The residential structure should be designed to accommodate ' an estimated different settlement of a minimum of 1 inch over- a distance of 40. feet (angular distortion of 1:480). 4.3 Slabs -On -Grade . L Concrete slabs and flatworks should be a (minimum of-_4'_inches-thick. Concrete floor slabs may ' either be monolithically placed I with the foundation or dowelled after footing placement. The. concrete slabs may be placed on granular subgrade that has been compacted at least 90% relative ' s compaction(ASTM D 1557) and moistened to near optimum. moisture just: before the concrete placement. To provide protection against vapor,or water transmission through the slabs, werecommend that the slabs -on grade be underlain by a layer of clean concrete sand at least'4 inches thick. To provide additional protection against water vapor, transmission through the slab in areas where vinyl or other. moisture -sensitive floor covering is planned; we recommend that a 10 -mil thick impermeable plastic membrane (visqueen) be placed at mid -height within the sand layer. The vapor inhibitor should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. We recommend that at least a 2 -foot lap be provided at the membrane edges or that the edges be sealed.. . Concrete slab and flatwork reinforcement should consist of chaired 'rebar slab reinforcement (minimum of No. 4 bars at 18 -inch centers, both horizontal directions) placed.at slab mid -height to ' resist potential swell forces and cracking: Slab thickness and steel reinforcement are.minimums LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 14 APNs 775-200-018=8 ,LCI Report No. LP1.5007 ' only and should be verified by the. structural engineer/designer knowing the actual; project loadings. The construction. joint, between the foundation and any mowstrips/sidewalks placed adjacent to foundations should be sealed with a polyurethane based non -hardening sealant to prevent moisture migration between the joint: _ Control joints should be provided in all concrete slabs=on-grade.at a rnaximum spacing (in feet) of 2. to 3 times the slab thickness (in inches) as recommended by American Concrete Institute' (ACI) guidelines. All joints should form approximately square patterns to reduce randomly oriented contraction cracks. Contraction joints in the -slabs. should be tooled at the time of the pour'or sawcut " (/a of slab depth) within 6 to 8. hours of concrete placement. Construction (cold) points in foundations and area flatwork should either be thickened butt -joints with.dowels or a'thickened. keyed -joint designed to resist vertical_ deflection at the joint: All joints in flatwork should be sealed to prevent moisture, vermin, or foreign material intrusion. Precautions should be taken to prevent . curling of slabs in! this and desert region .(refer to ACI guidelines). All independent concrete flatworks should be underlain by 12 inches of moisture conditioned and compacted soils. All flatwork should be jointed in square patterns and at irregularities in shape"at a ' maximum spacing of 10 feet or the least width of the sidewalk. 4.4 Concrete Mixes and CorrosNity Selected chemical analyses corrosivity were conducted on bulk samples of the near surface soil ' from the project site (Plate C-4). The native soils tested were shown to have low leveWbf sulfate ion - concentrations 455 m ' and low levels of chloride ion concentrations. (35 m .-Resistivit ( PP ) PP ) Y: . *determinations on the. soil indicate very severe potential for metal loss because of electrochemical + • corrosion processes. However; iri consideration of general corrosive environment. in the vicinity, a minimum of 4,000 psi - concrete of Type UfV Portland Cement with a maximum water -cement ration of 0.50 (by weight) should be placed in contact. with native soil on this 'project (site work including sidewalks, driveways, patios, and foundations). LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 15 APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Report No, LP 151007 A minimum concrete cover of three (3) inches is recommended around steel reinforcing or embedded components (anchor bolts, -hold' -downs, etc.) exposed to native soil or landscape water (to 18 inches ' above grade). The concrete should also be thoroughly vibrated during.placement. ' Landmark does not practice corrosion engineering. We recommend that a qualified c'or'rosion engineer evaluate the corrosion potential on metal construction materials and concrete`at the site. 4.5 Excavations All trench excavations should conform to CalOSHA requirements for Type C soil. The contractor is , solely responsible for the safety,of workers entering trenches. Temporary excavations with depths of , 4 feet or less may be cut nearly vertical for `short duration. Temporary slopes should be no steeper than 1 5:1- (horizontal:. vertical). 1. Trench excavations•deeper ihan'4 feet will require shoring;or slope inclinations in conformance to CAL/OSHA regulations for Type C soil.. Surcharge loads of stockpiled.soil or construction materials . should be set back from the top of the slope a minimum distance equal to the height of the slope.'All permanent slopes should not be'steeper than 3:1 to reduce wind -and rain•erosion. Protected slopes with ground cover may be ,as steep as 2: L However, maintenance with motorized equipment may not be possible at this inclination. 1 4 4.6 Lateral Earth Pressures ' Earth retaining structures, such as retaining walls., should be designed to, resist the soil pressure imposed by the retained soil mass.' Walls with granular drained backfill may be designed for an assumed static earth pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid weighing 40 pcf for unrestrained (active) conditions (able to rotate 0.1 % of wall height), and 51 pcf for restrained (at -rest) conditions. These values should be verified at the actual wall locations during construction. ' LandMark Consultants; Inc. Page 16 ' APNs 775-200-018-8 LCI Rep ort- LP15007 ' Section 5 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES. 5.1 Limitations The findings and professional_ opinions within'this report are _based ori current information regarding the proposed single family residences located at 55-487 Southern Hills, in Za Quinta, California. ' The conclusions and professional opinions of this report are invalid if: < Proposed building(s) location and size are changed from those shown in.this'report < Structural loads change from those state_ d or the structures are relocated. The Additional Services section of this report is not followed. The Subject report is used for adjacent or other property. < Changes of grade or groundwater occur between the issuance of this report" and construction other than those anticipated in this report. < Any other change that materially alters the project from that proposed at the.time this ' report was prepared a Findings and professional opinions iri this report are based on selected',points of field exploration, geologic literature, laboratory testing, and our understanding of the proposed project. Our analysis of data and professional opinions.presented herein are based on the assumption that soil conditions do riot vary significantly .from those found at specific exploratory locations.'• Variations in soil" conditions can "exist between and beyond the exploration points or groundwater elevations may change.",, If detected, these conditions may require ' additional studies; consultation, 'and possible . design revisions. . a This report contains information that maybe useful in the preparation of contract specifications. *' ' However, the reporiis not worded is such a -manner that we recommend its use as a construction SP document without proper modification. The use of information contained in this ' report for bidding, purposes should be done at the contractor's, option and risk. ' This reportwas prepared according to the generally accepted -geotechnical engineering standards of practice that existed in Riverside County at the time the report was prepared. No express or implied warranties are made in connection with our services: This report should be considered'invalid for" periods- after two years from -the report date without a review' of the•validity of the, findings and. LandMark Consultants; Inc. 1, - Page 18 -APNs 775-200-01M ' LCI Report No. LP15007 professional opinions by our firm; because; of potential changes in the Geotechnical Engineering Standards of Practice. The client has responsibility to see that all parties to the project including, designer; contractor, and ` subcontractor are made aware of this entire report. The use of information contained in this ieport for bidding purposes should be done at the contractor's option and risk. r- ' 5.2 Additional Services We recommend that ,a qualified geotechnical, consultant be retained to provide the tests and 'observations' services during construction. The geotechnical engineering firm providing such tests and observations shall become the geotechnical engineer'of record and assume responsibility for the r Project. .. r.The professional opinions presented in this report are based on the assumption that: < ° Consultation during development of design and construction documents to check that the' geotechnical professional opinions are appropriate for the proposed project and that the geotechnical professional opinions. are propeily, interpreted and incorporated into. the r 'documents. - < LandMark Corisultants,'Inc. will have the opportunity to review and comment on the '- plans and specifications forthe project prior to the issuance of such, for bidding. _ . < Continuous;observation, inspection, and testing by the geotechnical consultant of record during site clearing, grading, excavation; placement of fills, building pad and subgrade ' preparation; and backfilling of utility trenches. < Observation' of foundation excavations and reinforcing steel before concrete placement: < Other consultation as necessary during design and construction. f ' We emphasize our review of the project plans and specifications to check, for compatibility with our - professional opinions and conclusions. Additional information concerning the scope and cost of these services can be obtained from our office. LandMark Consultants, Inc. Page 19 • I r I r r s APPENDIX A' ' P - w �'NOp"'m c «4iTV TY2 cA,ranoln .1 .<�•, k w �. srl• 62 ll j S is Q` mm SPENDS ;A' .. ys)�J. � .. C(! � .. J l� _ c I f J NAMONAL' _§ E ,i ..•.o c /�.� "' ^ •%� L swim• N f Awa; MONUMENT 5 AHO cpqC E ' F - ° Q A..� ' i t 4f /- - —TA -FILL 4b+Toy Mla, flit, A D € �C� 46r mfr \4 . wv •1 _ - 7 / €� F ,r F y� .A 31) JPALMfl RINGS' e yTMOWN pR: NPAIM1, i--- ...a a .n span Bm.Ra AE1 .A CAUENTE INDIAN t CATHED R%1L-' s M. > / —.T CI�y I 1(7'(`� E Fnnl c SN.t:. D E `4 I T Jp 4v fIW j r+"'� Itl` C A • = 9' \Q / 'RVAEION 7> pp• E d+ a ^e. - p^r' f •' Fn. n� '#' '^tipa \ ` 3 ' ae - oA. Q9' • A - _ .a v . a yrs ..t ic& I - 3}�o A\ o Na y�` 6E�lUDA D1RtE a� v , ` `*� cnr �> t . ° �.�,�.�. ' AlM Fy ¢ -.I� _Y o�ectShe t j .'� ;t � � � wv:w s°dns � �.r• v�I. D�F� Ini n M1 A � V" INDIO +�_NF..N. a nr. ��' ci p R i �•��p� �r�4.e l�'� efrFbw.,, ' — R. � • '+=�aWE (u• s. .• m t E�n.w raw• �. /'e.�� n.�ri:•«L MIa. 7a...; � � r F� ooN NIa �\ /7RAM16 PEAL v°��. J � 5C .• �} a .'ftob2Z* cm Elc.l '..1 WILDERNESS ;3 +�1 � �"f`'i'`�!�+!l:Yd'IC'%.�.W.:��11 `dT�ti �s�i{�\'^�•v/....-.� Jas ate' -'•.% �:. n. STATE GAM ALPWI `440REST = a v P 7 TpII 1. REFUGE aD (�s, +�.r�i,��.L:I. �� i I• A4/Ay c T Iia 5a M n. �• R°II r SANiA ROSH INDIAN,�f'°°" T 1 ESERVATIONj .`LoL'04 011 ��+tt SANTA ROSH WILDERNESS FFF ��1 tttl I \ I I It Geo-Engineers and Geologists • Au urt Blvd. 4L H � !Aup°ri 91r `� e m. c.nwra a" _ rr� sa:5 2 I 5 ¢• �i A.rnue ...\ W A \A- 16 rc Vicinity Map Plate A-1 9 40! off 9 40! 9 u •;' .fn . �z� -� r4 117 a -SLS' 21, Map Sole: 1:3,320 if printed on A portrait (8.5'x 11") sheet NlebErs N 0 45 90 180 270 kFeet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer wadnates: WG584 IRI, mil �yl IIILG Geo-Engineers and Geolog_11 ists • USDA Soil Conservation Soil Service Map Plate A-3 Soil Map -Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey_ 2/4/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION ` Area of Interest (AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys'that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. _ O Area of Interest (AOI) a' ®, Stony Spot - � Warning: Soil Map -may notbe valid at this scale. Solis • Soil Map Unit Polygons Very Stony Spot - Enlargement of map's beyond the scale of mapping can cause ' Wet Spot.. misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line= svr Soil Map Unit Lines placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting ;} other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale: Soil Map Unit Points ' z-. - Special Point Features .• Special Line Features - - Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map LO)' Blowout Water Features measurements. Borrow Pit Streams and Canals Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Source 'http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Transportation Soil Survey URL: - � Clay Spot - �..+. Rails - Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Closed Depression ry Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator X Gravel Pit Routes projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts' ,y US distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the - 4 Gravelly Spot Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. ` Landfill Local Roads r . product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Lava FlowThis Background the version date(s) listed below. Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, Mine or Quarry California ' Area Data: Version 7, jSep 9, 2014. Miscellaneous Water _Survey water Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 _ Perennial or larger. til ' • Rock Outcrop Date(s) aerial images were photographed:. - May 2, 2010-1un.3, Saline Spot' .. 2010. Sandy Spot y „ , ':'. 'The orthophoto or other base map on, which the soil lines were - t compiled and digitized probably differs from the background n severely Eroded spot _ imagery displayed on these maps. As 6 result, some minor shifting ' Sinkhole of map unit boundaries may be evident. bT j Slide or Slip ; oa . Sodic Spot s �. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey_ 2/4/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, Calffomia•(CA680) Mao -Unit Symbol . --r — ~ —Map UnitName-`4~ �- •--�---,-Acres°in-AOI:---- , P rcent•of•AOI. Is Indio very.fine:sandy loam 49.7 94.7% w Water 2,8 5.3%_ Totals for Area of Interest 52.5 100.0% MF. j -N33-40 51tv 1 N. Copyright 4) 1999 DeLonnc Yarmouth, I(100 Reference: USGS Topographic Map Site Coordinates La Quinta, CA Quadrangle "Lat: 33.6458 N Scale 1:25,000 Long: 116.2571 W LANUMARK s Geo -Engineers rGeologists , Plate Project NO.: LPI 5607 Topographic Map A-4 .i 9qq ' 3G Q' ,. . r. D. r.i.i .\a••t f' IFl • '� 'P •J'• •.I q'r '• + � j1�• - _ •�••. 1��•�Z � .•i _ !fir .. � .. • 'r �: s: s r• 4, •, t ' - • ` ( r1� - si. {'al++: t• •ll.f`�Fpp� "+i LZr'1e �i?•�� . . � '+ '� i r,, , -r. ��B! 1 1.x+I1iD7U. V_ I'•r - u •J} •-�Y. .. :,� r , .C,1wL r y♦ .. xJf f,�r � I. } i♦.7.� . ! ::r } R tet• .f '�' � �� '!`!I � AVENU N]J GORY ' rte � �, it 1 V •• , �f r J �r. .rV -4f t1ny, i �',•� n � i. •ect ' ,;"�3`� � "; ° � �� o � ' r ,: P��. Site � ` J t•! ;1J r{ tti�4 � ,. ' n i , l �i,Y'•1J� 2 off"' "'� . t x• � x + + ♦" n . _ r � r n j -N33-40 51tv 1 N. Copyright 4) 1999 DeLonnc Yarmouth, I(100 Reference: USGS Topographic Map Site Coordinates La Quinta, CA Quadrangle "Lat: 33.6458 N Scale 1:25,000 Long: 116.2571 W LANUMARK s Geo -Engineers rGeologists , Plate Project NO.: LPI 5607 Topographic Map A-4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY GIS oAk' �.c✓4.: Ryy�(E8� C -^i.'- R4� ♦ �� +V r .x - ,.a� , v,. ,;# t a*. '-`. `_.�._ ...�.. ".W `�"�' 4. LaOuint 80UTHERN HYLLS J r " 1......r" �� •, 1 [, iy .. ,/t, � �� .. ,}_tel _ � � ��. 0 442 feet Riverside County TLMA GIS ,I ± Selected parcel(s): 775-200-018 SUBSIDENCE FISELECTED PARCEL INTERSTATES% HIGHWAYS I _i CITY [ PARCELS ACTIVE 'IMPORTANT' Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on.this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. LANDMARK Riverside County �I Geographic Information System (GIS) Plate Project No.: LP15007 Subsidence A-5 � � i ' �. •, � ,� . , •�i .. r� CLIENT: BEH Properties METHOD OF DRILLING:'CME 75 w/autohammer PROJECT: APN 775-200-018-8 - La Quinta, CA DATE OBSERVED: 2/3/2015 LOCATION: PGA West Country Club LOGGED BY.- J. Lorenzana FIELD LABORATORY LOG OF BORING NO. B-1 a LL } O a n> i (n t z , SHEET 1 OF 2 F Z W a r 'z o _ F -Lu O Lu a Z ~ ~ j z LL w a .U' DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL w m g �¢ o, o ~ o o z a o z o a ~ :' a ❑ U y m. a 2 U o ,.. o U � •a a SILTY SAND (SM): Yellowish brown, dry. • 36 62 SANDY SILT (ML): Yellowish brown, dry, dense. 1.4 107.4 10 12 SILTY SAND (SM): Yellowish brown, dry. 2 14 15 52 i dense 2.1 106.3 20 11 SANDY SILT (ML): Yellowish brown, very moist. , 19.7 r f, 72 25 36 dense ` 13.7 104.4 30 6 SILTY CLAY (CL): Yellowish brown, moist. 7 35 T T 56 SILTY SAND:(SM): Yelloish brown, dry, dense, with traces of gravel. 4.5 124.6 40 TTT 20 SILTY SAND (SM): Yellowish brown, dry, loose. 4.9 15 SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A TOTAL DEPTH: 51.5 ft . DEPTH TO WATER: N/A PROJECT NO.: LANOMARK:PLATE LP15007 Geo -Engineers and . B-1 CLIENT: BEH Properties METHOD OF DRILLING: CME 75 w/autohammer PROJECT: APN 775-200-018-8 - La Quinta, CA DATE OBSERVED: 2/3/2015 LACATION: PGA West Country Club LOGGED BY: J. Lorenzana FIELD LABORATORY LOG OF BORING NO. B-1 a LL o Z a z z •. SHEET 2 OF 2 U LL J O U a H - rF F j LL w 0 Ix 0 V H 'i C9 z w g a o o DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL o o a a z o 'o lxxx SILTY SAND/SANDY SILT (SM/ML): Yellowish brown, moist, loose. 45 26 devise t 16.5 99.3 50 Id 22 f SILTY CLAY (CL): Yellowish brown, moist. Y 23.4 80 55 , 60 65 70 75 - 80 SURFACE ELEVATION: N/A TOTAL DEPTH: 51.5 DEPTH TO WATER: N/A PROJECT NO.: LANDMARK. PLATE LP15007 Geologists B-2 DEFINITION OF.TERMS PRIMARY nivi.RIANS SYMHnLS SECONDARY DIVISIONS t GRAIN SIZES • • Silts and Clays Sand Gravel Cobbles Boulder Fine Medium . Coarse Fine Coarse 200 40 10 4 3/4" 3" 12" Sands, Gravels, etc. : Gra4els Very Loose • n: a• GW Well graded greveIs, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Loose 4-10 Clean gravels (less n ri r Dense iii GP Poorly graded gravels, or gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Very Dense than 5%fines) Stiff More than half of 8-16 Ell GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures, nonplastic fines 1632 coarse fraction is Over 4.0 Larger than No. 4 1.. sieve Gravel with fines Coarse grained soils More GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines ' than half of material is larger that No. 200 sieve$ands Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no finesClean sands (lethan P�rlY graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines 5 % fines) More than half of sands, sandsilt mixtures, nan plastic fines is coarse fraction issmaller than No. 4Silty Sands with finesieve Clayey sands, sand -day mixtures, plastic fines Silts and clays IILII ML Inorganic silts, clayey silts with slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravely, sandy, or lean Gays Liquid limit is less than 50% Fine grained soils More : ' :I OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity . than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve Silts and clays I I I I MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous silty soils, elastic silts CH Inorganic Gays of high plasticity, fat Gays Liquid limit is more than 50% �.. - .�. OHOrganic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts Highly organic soils rW PT Peat and other highly organic soils t GRAIN SIZES • • Silts and Clays Sand Gravel Cobbles Boulder Fine Medium . Coarse Fine Coarse 200 40 10 4 3/4" 3" 12" Sands, Gravels, etc. Blows/ft' Very Loose 04 Loose 4-10 Medium Dense 1030 . Dense 3050 Very Dense Over 50 US Standard Series Sieve } Clear Square Openings Clays & Plastic Silts Strength " BlowsHt Very Soft 0-0.25 0-2 Soft 0.25-0.5 24 Firm 0.5-1.0 4-0 Stiff 1.0-2.0 • 8-16 Very Stiff 2.0-4.0 1632 Hard Over 4.0 Over 32 Number of blows of 140 Ib. hammer falling 30 inches to drive a 2 inch O.D. (1 3/8 in. I.D.) split spoon (ASTM D1586). *` Unconfined compressive strength in tons/s.f. as determined by laboratory testing or approximated by the Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D1586), Pocket Penetrometer, Torvane, or visual observation. Type of Samples: I + Ring Sample Standard Penetration Test IShelby Tube • Bulk (Bag) Sample .Drilling Notes: 1. Sampling and Blow Counts Ring Sampler - Number of blows per foot of a 140 Ib. hammer falling 30 inches. Standard Penetration Test -Number of blows per foot Shelby Tube -Three (3) inch nominal diameter tube hydraulically pushed. 2. P. P. = Pocket Penetrometer (tons/s.f.). 3. NR = No recovery. 4. GWT -T =Ground Water Table observed.@ specified time. LANDMARK Plate Project No.: LP14133 Key to Logs B-3 o W SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Fraction Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine 100 90 80 1,171 11 IfillM L 70 °A iv 3 60 c N YI a 50 . aOJ 40 30 r1 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 r Particle Size (mm) LANDMARK Geo -Engineers and Geologists Plate Project No.: LP15007 Grain Size Analysis C-1 1 j!i,�� I {ill; { (ISI'' � ► ' 1 ! � { �(I I i `#►Ij � ll)� I; Il�i�l 4 'i��l I �{!► �hl,� ' !,III I � t i t, i�i:i � i l !iii i I� j ,III��s iii`! ► I II:_I��_: 'i1 I ' I•a I --O--B-1 0-3 ft 1 I - .. ..11 IL F- I -------------„"-.--..I —Curves of 100% saturation forspecific gravity equal to: 2.75 2.70 2.65 LANDMARKM Geo -Engineers and Geologists •eet No.:11 a 1 1 1 1 CONSULTANTS,LANDMARK BEH'Properties, LLC PROJECT: APN 775-11 1 • NO: 11 1 15 --COLAPSE POTENTIAL ' �■■■■■■■sae■■■■■■■ve■■■■■■■e ate■■■■■re��■■■■■ee�■■■■■■ee o■®■■■■■ems e■■■■e■■e�■e■■■■■■e ' NONE ■-■■■■1e®��■�■■■ee�■■■�■■■e MENO■INEE! ee��.�■■■■■e�■■■■■■ee �■■■�■■■ems■ii■■■■��■■■■■■■1 ®O■■■■■■ems■��■■■ee�■rr■■■t1 �■.■■■■■ee�e■■■■■■els■■i■■■■1 ' �e■■�■■■■ �■■■■■■■ear®■■■■■e Results of Test Initial Final Sample Location: B-1 @ 15 ft. Dry Density (pc Q: 1. Soil Type: Silty Sand (SM) Water Content 2.9 16.8.: Overburden Pressure, • •: 1.65 ksf Void Ratio 0.549 1 , Saturation • 102.6 LANDMARK -1,... . Geo -Engineers and Geologists • • • 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. CLIENT: BEH Properties PROJECT:.APN 775-200=018-8' ;- JOB No.: LF15007 DATE: 02/13/15 '. ------------=------------------`----------------------------=-------------------------- ----_ -------------- ----------'- --=--=--- t. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------;-------------;-----------------------------� CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ----------------- ----------------------------- Boring: -13-1 a ''Caltrans -Sample-Depth, q:%. 0-3 Method OH: 7.1 + 643, , Electrical Conductivity (mmhos):. N/A i 424 Resistivity (ohm -cm): 780 " 643 Chloride (CI), ppm: • 35 422 Sulfate (SO4), ppm: 455 " " ` 41� --------------- ----------------------------------------- ,-------------------------------------------------------:-------:----------------;---------------------------- General Guidelines for Soil Corrosivity. - Material Chemical Amount in. Degree of ' Affected Agent Soil (ppm) Corrosivity Concrete •- Soluble 0-1,000 Low - t Sulfates 1,000 - 2,000 Moderate - 2,000 - 20,000 Severe , r _ ?20,000 Very Severe Normal �''' 'Soluble 0-200 Low Grade ' Chlorides 200-700 Modeiate Steel 700-1,500 Severe >'1,500 Very,Severe ' Normal Resistivity 1 -1,000, evere Very Severe' - Grade 1,000 - 2,000 " Severe Steel 2,000 - 10,000 - Moderate - > 10,000' Low LANDMARK Geo -Engineers and Geologists • LP1500T Plate C-4 Seismic Settlement Calculation Project Name: APN 775-020-018-8 = Project No.: LP15007 Location: a-1 Maximum Credible Earthquake ` - 7.6 Design Ground Motion 0.68 g , Total Unit Weight, 100 pcf Nc Water Unit Weight, 62.4 pcf 16.1 Depth to Groundwater 60 ft -Hammer Effenciency 90 - y ' Rod Length • 3 , Mod. Cal SPT � DEPTH ; (ft.) THICKNESS (ft.) Susceptible - O -PRESS NI(60) Fine Content Nn60)cs p Gmax Shear Strain Gam- eff E15 Enc Settlement (in.) TOTAL (in.) 62 5 5 1 0.25 74.7 72 95 0.168 834 2.92E-04 4.53E-05 4.68E-05 0.01 12 10 5 1 0.50 21.8 14 25 0.335 756- 1.43E-03 1.10E-03 1.13E-03 0.14 ; 52 15 5 1 0.75 88.1.. 14 94 0.503' 1441 4.36E-04 6.81E-05 7.04E-05 0.01 1 l 20 5 1 1.00 174 72 26 0.670 1083 1.56E-03 1.15E-03 L 18E-03 0.14 36 25 5 ' 1 .1.25 53.7. 72 69 0.838 1682 6.46E-04 L45E-04 .1.50E-04 0.02 6 30 5 0.1 1.50 8.3 80 15 1.005 1105 t - 56 35. � 5 1 ,.1.75 71:8 36-- 91 = 1.173 2179 5.59E-04 -9.05E-054,- 9.34E-05 0.01 20 ' 40 5 1 2.00 24.0 15 28 1:340 1565 1.36E-03 9.22E-04 9.52E-04 0.11 26 45 5, 1 2.25 29.4 "' 36 . - 40 1.508 .•1882 9.08E-04' 3.92E-04 . 4.05E-04" 0.05 22 50 5 0 2.50 23.6 80 33 1.675 1862 0.48 - _ ti �- REFERENCES -"t ., - ,... t:- ,. . • . '. - �.., ,,. :. _ ,� - - - _ _ (1) Tokimatsu�and Seed, 1984. Simplified Procedures for the Evaluation of Settlements in Clean Sands: - (2) Seed and Idriss, 1982. Ground Motion and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, EERI Monograph.. , (3) Youd, Leslie, 1997. Proceeding of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils (4) Pradel, Daniel, 1998. JGEE, Vol. 124, No. 4, ASCE *. • (5) Seed, et. al., 2003, Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework. University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report 2003-06, 71 p. �, .. , . �- ,} r • _ r Hydroconsolidation Settlement•Calculation .Project Name ' APNs 775-200-018-8 ;- Project -No.: LP15007 f _ - ,+ cation: B1 Lot 1 �, } - _ .� .- �.. s • 5 y 3 'Load f : 2000 lbs` .Footing Width 2 ft• _` .- ' �''• ;? + ` , r' Footing Length 2 ft. Footing Depth - 1:5 ft - . _ti .� ... y�. ,< f .;>=t - _ _ s _ - - Weigff of Footing • 900 lbs n_ 'r -Bearing Pressure ,725YIb/ft2 Stress Initial. Caused by Total -Threshold Thickness. _ v `Derisit . vertical'' Footing vertical •' colla se H drocoila se ". x', Wetting Settlement - -Y ' 9 P Y P g Depth (ft) (ft) Depth (ft) , (Ib/ft3) • stress: •: Load: . �� stress '.stress Coefficient . Coefficierit '.. (ft) _ .. -oro,-I: .. oor z or Qi` ` ..Cw - r a; 6' r 1.5 9.0 7.5. .- 3.75 , 107 561.75 60 622 200'. (0.012 0.85 ~' .0.038 � r` t rr a 9.0 -"- 19.0 - 10.0 12:50 106 1484 6i r ;'{.' '1490 200, ..'r',4 0.012- 0.85 0.089 19.0 29.0 ";.=10.0 -22.50 '';. 104 2496, 2 - ..,2498 200. r 0.012 0.8 0.105 29.0 - 34.0 '5.0' 30.00 90 2835 = f 1 2836 200` ' 0 . - 0.7 0.000 34.0 - 47.0 13.0 39.00 100 4050 1, 4051 ,200'- ^ 0.a 0.6 0.01.00 _ 47.0 51.5 •4.5 47.75" 90 .4432.5, 0 .°� 4433 Y 200,; } ' 0. 0.5 _e 0.000:. �. 0.0 0.0 0.0• 1.50 • ; 0 0 250. •- 250 i '• 200 0 t 0 0.000 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' -1:50 0 , =0 ; 250 . -.x.250.'. •200, - 0 = 0 0.000 ` t ' . i- `'�' `f �`.,• i r a �' iA - r .� a i1` ,*. 'f, ,, -.ark,. -4 5 • • TotaI Y- , - :0.23 - It • .. ' • ` r ' S r.. �+u Sy f s�, + t i, v t' + ce ''"t x� Y f til .a 2.8 in ^ � •, v • •.` -.r i. Q_,y� �y-' _ ` 'a- s -r` .� ,., r.C•► "� '� t ., L w .i j; a - ' i a � . '.. - _ ,; .ut*:; - - i.�� 1"i "y � -c _. ce �A=', 7�' - .. :�•. 's X11-' �• - ._�-r �-' ., ,-, .. a , - . � ^+ , ..r* 1 p' 9*y. e -�-. .. • •n -'.Er,. -.,, 'q ..~yam .. -. _r X .i •f - .. ' REFERENCES Arango I., 1996, Magnitude Scaling Factors for Soil Liquefaction Evaluation_ s: ASCE ' Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 122; No. 11' Bartlett ; Steven F. and,,Youd, T. Leslie, 1995, Empirical Prediction of Liquefaction- ` ' Induced Lateral pread: Spread:'ASCE Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 121, No. 4. ' Blake,•.T. F., 2000, FRISKSP - A computer program for the probabilistic estimation of seismic hazard using faults as earthquake sources. ' Bolt, B. A.,,'1974, Duration of Strong, Motion: Proceedings 5th World Conference on ` Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy, June ' 1974. ' Boore,.D. M:, Joyner, W. B., and Fumal, T. E., 1994, Estimation of response spectra and. -peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Reports 94-127 and 93-509. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., and Fumal, T. E.,'1997, Empirical Near -Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground ' Acceleration, Peak - Ground Velocity, and Pseudo -Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra: Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No.i1, p. 154-179. ' Bray, J. D., Sancio, R. B., Riemer; M. F. and Durgunoglu, T., (2004) Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine -Grained Soils:' Proc. 11th Inter. Conf. in Soil Dynamics, and Earthquake, Engineering .and' 3`d Inter. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical - Engineering'., Doolin, Kammerer, Nogami, Seed, and Towhata, Eds.,, Berkeley, CA, Jan. 7-9, V.l, pp. 655-662. ' Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 1991, NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations of new buildings, Parts 1, 2 and Maps: FEMA 222, January 1992 ' ' California Building. Standards Commission 2007 2007: California Building' Code. g California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Vol. 2 of 2. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1996, California Fault Parameters: available at http://www.consrv.ca: og v/dm shezp/fltindex.html California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1962, Geologic Map of California Santa Ana Quadrangle Sheet: California Division of Mines and Geology, Scale,, ' 1:250;000. , Cao, T., Bryant, W: A.,, Rowshandel, B., Branum, D., and Wills, C: J., 2003, The revised ' 2002. California probabilistic seismic hazards maps: California Geological " Survey: hILtp://www.consei-vation.ca.gov/cgs/rghrh/psh hrh/psha. Department .of Water Resources ' (DWR), 1964, Coachella Valley Investigation: Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No. 108. .'Ellsworth, W. L.;• 1990, Earthquake. History, 1769-1989 in: The. San Andreas Fault System, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1515, 283 p. International Conference of Building Officials -(ICBG), 1994, Uniform Building'Code, 1 '1994 Edition: International- Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1997, Uniform ' Building Code, ' 1997 Edition. Ishihara, K. (1985), Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes;Proc. II Int. Conf.- rOn - Soil Mech. And Found, Engrg., Vol. 1, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam,' The Netherlands, 321-376: Jennings; C. W., 1994, Fault activity map of California and Adjacent, Areas; California. Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Geologic Map No. 6. Jones, L. and- Hauksson,�E.; 1994, Review of potential. earthquake"sources m" Southern' 'Applied Technology Council, Proceedings of ATC 35=1. • Joyner, W. B. and Boore, D. M., 1988, Measurements, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion: ASCE Geotechnical. Special Pub. No. 20. ' Mualchin, L. and Jones, A. • L., 1992, Peak acceleration from maximum credible earthquakes in California (Rock ,and Stiff Soil, Sites): California -Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Open File Report92-01. Naeim, F. and'Anderson, J. C., 1993, Classification and evaluation of earthquake iecoids for design: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute,-NEHRP Report..' National Research Council, Committee of Earthquake Engineering,1985, Liquefaction of . ' Soils during Earthquakes: National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. Norris, Robert M., Robert W. Webb, .1976, Geology of California: University of ' ' California,. Santa Barbara. , Porcella, R. L., Mattliiesen, R. B., and' Maley, R. P., 1982, Strong -motion data recorded ' in the United'IStates: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1254, p. 289- 318. , Robertson, P. K., 1996; Soil Liquefaction and its evaluation based on SPT and CPT: in ' unpublished paper presented at' 1996 NCEER Liquefaction Workshop rte„ Seed, Harry B., Idriss, I: M., and Arango.I., 1983, Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data: ASCE Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 109, No. 3. ' Seed,,Harry B., et al, 1985, Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations: ASCE Geotechnical Journal,- Vol. 113, No. 8..ie y Sharp, R. V., 1989, Personal communication, USGS; Menlo Park, CA... ; Stringer, S: L., 1996, EQFAULT.WK4, A computer program for the estimation of deterministic site acceleration. 1,10 ' Stringer, & L. 1996,�LIQUEFY.WK4, A computer program for the Empirical Prediction of Earthquake -Induced Liquefaction Potential. 'Structural, Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), 1990, Recommended lateral R force requirements and commentary. Tokimatsu, K. and Seed H. B.,'-1987, Evaluation of settlements 'in sands due to earthquake shaking: ASCE Geotechnical Journal, V. 113; no. 8. , U.S. Geological Survey (USGS);-.1990, The San Andreas Fault System, California, Professional Paper 1515. - - _ r ' U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1996, National Seismic ,Hazard Maps: available at' http://gldage.cr.usgs.gov , , Wallace,.. R:• E., 1990, The San Andreas Fault System, California: U.S.,. Geological Survey Professional Paper.1515, 283 p. ` tWorking Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 1988,,Probabilities of large earthquakes occurring in California . on the San- Andreas Fault:. U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report,88i398. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 1992, Future: s hazards'in southern California, Phase I Report: California Division of Mines and ?` ' Geology. � Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), 1995, Seismic hazards in 'southern California, Probable Earthquakes, 1994-2014,. Phase' II Report: Southern California Earthquake Center. Youd, T. Leslie and Garris, C. T., 1995, Liquefaction induced ground surface disruption:. ' ASCE Geotechnical Journal, Vol.•'121`,- No: 11: ,