The URL can be used to link to this page

2013 05 07 CCCity Council agendas and staff reports are now available on the City s web page: www.ia-guinta.org CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, MAY 7, 2013 AT 4:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Osborne, Mayor Adolph PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a 'request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATIONS — NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — NONE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 . MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 May 7, 2013 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. 1 . DEMAND REGISTER DATED MAY 7, 2013 2. OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO, CA, JUNE 2-5, 2013 3. CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT A MODERN ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND CALLE SINALOA, PROJECT NO. 2010-11 4. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DUDEK FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2012-07 5. REAFFIRM ADOPTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA (CSA) 152, AUTHORIZE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS, AND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FOR LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY PARCELS UNDER CSA 152 [RESOLUTION 2013-0181 6. SPECIFICATIONS, BID DOCUMENTS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PROJECT NOS. 2012-03, 2012-04, AND 2012-05 7. CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH VINTAGE ASSOCIATES FOR PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 8. CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH SANTA FE BUILDING FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 9. LEASE OF OLD FIRE STATION NO. 32 TO SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. 10. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM THE LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE 9/11 MEMORIAL [RESOLUTION 2013-0191 11. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY PATRICIA VROOMAN; DATE OF LOSS — MARCH 13, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION 1. ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 11.44.060 PARKS AND RECREATION AREAS, PROHIBITING SMOKING IN CITY PARKS A. TAKE UP ORDINANCE NO. 510 BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING B. INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 510 ON FIRST READING STUDY SESSION 1. ALTERNATIVES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE COACHELLA CANAL WITHIN THE SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1 . CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFO EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Evans) 2. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 3. CVAG ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Franklin) 6. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (Franklin) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (Franklin) 8. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Franklin) 9. JACQUELINE COCHRAN REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY (Franklin) 10. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Henderson) 11. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Henderson) 12. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Henderson) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Henderson) 14. CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Osborne) 15. IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE (Osborne) 16. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Adolph) 17. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Adolph) 18. SO. CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS DELEGATE (Adolph) 19. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Adolph) 20. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES DATED MARCH 13, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 May 7, 2013 DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1 . CITY MANAGER 2. CITY CLERK A. REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF PERRIS TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING SUPPORT FOR $92 MILLION IN STATE FUNDS FOR THE LAKE PERRIS DAM REMEDIATION PROJECT 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. CITYWIDE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE DISTRICT AND PARKS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT UPDATE B. UPDATE ON LAING LUXORY HOMES PM10 FENCE 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. GOLDENVOICE CONCERTS UPDATE MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBER'S ITEMS CLOSED SESSION NOTE: Time permitting the City Council may conduct Closed Session discussions during the dinner recess. 1. CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY, ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (c) (one matter) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION AND DINNER BREAK RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a 'request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 May 7, 2013 1. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1, FISCAL YEAR 201 3/201 4 [RESOLUTION 2013-0201 2. FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THROUGH 2O17/2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM [RESOLUTION 2013-0211 3. ZONE CHANGE 2012-142 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146 TO REZONE AND CONVERT AN EXISTING 15,933 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING INTO AN INDOOR MINIATURE GOLF RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUNE PALMS ROAD AND CORPORATE CENTRE DRIVE. APPLICANT: ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF, LLC [RESOLUTION 2013-0221 4. A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875 FOR APPROXIMATELY 234,450 SQUARE FOOT OF RETAIL AND MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE. APPLICANT: MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. [RESOLUTION 2013-023 AND RESOLUTION 2013-0241 ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on May 21, 2013, commencing with closed session at 3:00 p.m. and open session at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Susan Maysels, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78-630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on May 3, 2013. DATED: May 3, 2013 SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 May 7, 2013 Public Notices • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required. • If background material is to be presented to the Planning Commission during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. • Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Planning Department's counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 May 7, 2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 2013 A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:01 p.m. by Mayor Adolph. PRESENT: Councilmembers Evans, Franklin, Henderson, Osborne, Mayor Adolph ABSENT: None. PUBLIC COMMENT — None. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY, ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (c) (one matter) 2. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, FRANK J. SPEVACEK, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT SILVERROCK RESORT (APNs: 770200026; 776150021 /023; 777060056-059, 061 /062; 777490004, 006/007/012 AND 014). PROPERTY OWNERS/ NEGOTIATORS: BRIAN D. ADLER, BEVERLY PARK DEVELOPMENT; TOM GOLLOPrBISGG`rEM4 LAND ^^.� Y; AND ROBERT S. GREEN, JR., THE ROBERT GREEN COMPANY Prior to convening to Closed Session, City Attorney Jenson announced that Discovery Land Company has withdrawn from consideration regarding the property at SilverRock. COUNCIL RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSIONAT 3:03 P.M. MAYOR ADOLPH RECONVENED THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:02 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION THAT REQUIRES REPORTING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.1 (BROWN ACT). Mayor Adolph led the audience in the pledge of allegiance. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 APRIL 16, 2013 PUBLIC COMMENT Public Speakers: Damaris Gonzalez, Brianna Sloan, Madison Smith, Molly Piza, students from Desert Sands Unified School District promoting an ordinance to ban smoking in public parks. Councilmembers directed staff to prepare an ordinance banning smoking in La Quinta public parks for Council consideration. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA City Manager Spevacek announced that for this meeting, the Study Session item will be taken up before Business Session items to provide background to the SilverRock reports to follow. PRESENTATIONS 1. PROCLAMATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH IN HONOR OF MAY 2013 AS MENTAL HEALTH MONTH Mayor Adolph presented the proclamation to Sandra Neja who accepted on behalf of the Riverside County Department of Mental Health. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Adolph thanked the staff and teachers of La Quinta High School for their work resulting in La Quinta experiencing the highest graduation rate in the Valley — over 95%. Councilmember Henderson requested that a thank -you also be sent to the School Board. All Councilmembers concurred. Mayor Adolph stated that he received a letter from a Valley resident in appreciation of the La Quinta Police Department. Mayor Adolph read a portion of the letter, which stated in part: "The La Quinta Police Department consistently responds in an expeditious manner and is always courteous, professional, and proficient in apprehending suspects." [Letter is on file with the City Clerk.] Mayor Adolph stated that he received an e-mail from a resident expressing her gratitude for "the hard work everyone connected with the city does to keep our community as beautiful as it is." [Letter is on file with the City Clerk.] CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 APRIL 16, 2013 APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Evans/ Henderson to approve the minutes of April 2, 2013 as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2013 AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2013 2. CITYWIDE POLICY CHANGE FROM SUMMARY MINUTES TO ACTION MINUTES 3. EXCUSE BOARD MEMBER DAVID PARK'S ABSENCE FROM THE APRIL 10, 2013 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 4. EXCUSE CHAIRPERSON KATHLEEN FITZPATRICK'S ABSENCE FROM THE MAY 13, 2013 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING 5. AMENDMENT TO THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES BYLAWS REGARDING PREREQUISITES FOR SUBMITTING RESOLUTIONS TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND FOR TAKING A POSITION ON ANY STATEWIDE BALLOT MEASURE 6. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID OF THE SILVERROCK RESORT PARKING LOT AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2012-09 7. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TRAFFEX ENGINEERS, INC. FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER SERVICES 8. Pulled for discussion and a separate vote > > > RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 36405, LA QUINTA RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, LA QUINTA RETIREMENT RESIDENCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP [RESOLUTION 2013-0161 9. REJECT ALL BIDS AND RE -ADVERTISE FOR BID THE CALLE SINALOA AND AVENUE 52 SIDEWALK INFILL IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NUMBER 2012- 08 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 APRIL 16, 2013 10. DEMAND REGISTER DATED APRIL 16, 2013 11. TREASURER'S REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2013 12. RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ENTERPRISE ZONES [RESOLUTION 2013-0171 Public Speaker: Helga Paul, La Quinta — Ms. Paul requested that Council approve Item No. 8 regarding the retirement community project so that the development can proceed. She explained that the problems with the tumbleweeds, dust and sand have increased over the past year for her and all her neighbors living along the wall adjoining this development. Dust control is not being done and no agencies are enforcing the dust control requirements. City Attorney Jenson advised Council that they could add to the motion on this item a condition that all dust requirements be completed and verified by Public Works before the City releases the map and agreements. Councilmembers asked staff to look into the situation, enforce the sand stabilizing and tumbleweed removal requirements, and to report back to Council. Public Speaker: Mark Lowen of Lenity Architecture representing the developer — He stated that the developer would work with staff and Ms. Paul to stabilize and clear the property starting tomorrow. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Henderson/ Evans to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-7 and 9-1 2 as recommended with Item No.12 adopting Resolution No. 2013-017. Motion passed unanimously. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Evans/Franklin to approve Item No. 8 by adopting Resolution No. 2013-016 with an amendment to the agreement's conditions of approval to include a requirement for staff to verify that the soil has been stabilized, tumbleweeds and debris removed, and all PM-10 requirements have been met within the thirty (30) days prior to the recordation of Parcel Map 36405. ANNOUNCEMENT BY MAYOR ADOLPH RE: VOTING ON SILVERROCK MATTERS Mayor Adolph said that in the interest of transparency, he wanted to express his opinion, which is solely his and not that of Council or staff. He said the city has been inundated with e-mails complaining and accusing Council and staff of everything but the Kennedy assassination and he finds this borders on harassment. He is concerned that residents will get the wrong idea. He said that in his twenty plus years of involvement, he has never known Council or staff to give false information about any issue, so to be accused of this time and time again is not appreciated. Recently he received notice from the Fair Political Practices CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 APRIL 16, 2013 Commission (FPPC) about a sworn complaint filed against him by Linda Gunnett. The complaint involved the contention that a conflict of interest exists if he votes on SilverRock issues due to the proximity of his residence in PGA West to the SilverRock property. Mayor Adolph announced that he received a letter yesterday from the FPPC stating that it has closed its file on this complaint without initiating an enforcement action. [A copy of the FPPC letter is on file with the City Clerk.] City Attorney Jenson explained the legal basis for the decision that Mayor Adolph does not have a conflict of interest regarding SilverRock property matters and is cleared to participate in the discussions and voting. She referred to her letter to the FPPC dated April 8, 2013 and its attachments. [A copy of the letter is on file with the City Clerk.] STUDY SESSION 1. SILVERROCK RESORT FINANCIALS Community Services Director Hylton and Golf & Park Manager Howlett presented the staff report, which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Staff responded to Councilmembers' questions regarding the planned use of the capital reserve funds; the average revenue -per -round versus the average cost -per - round calculation; the annual interest on the $5.3 million advance from the city; the history and logic of the advances, and why the loan is still on the books; the increase in the $7 range fee to $10; expense reductions; maximum number of rounds during the high season and shoulder seasons; tournaments; and leasing versus owning equipment. Council debated the pros and cons of beginning to repay the interest due to the city from SilverRock for the loans and advances, and when practical, to begin repaying the principal. Council reached a consensus to reduce capital reserve to 1 % for fiscal year 201 2/13 and deposit the interest repayments into the reserve fund. City Manager Spevacek confirmed with Council that all supported enacting the three revenue alternatives outlined in the staff report. BUSINESS SESSION 1. SILVERROCK RESORT 2013/2014 ANNUAL PLAN Golf & Parks Manager Howlett and Community Services Director Hylton presented the staff report, which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 APRIL 16, 2013 Councilmember Osborne recommended that staff renew its research into the owners of the small parcels along the 151h hole against the mountain. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Franklin/ Henderson to approve the SilverRock Resort 2013/2014 Annual Plan as submitted by Landmark Golf Management, LLC with the following amendment: revisit the marketing plan with the goal of reducing funds spent on local ads, increasing funds spent on the regional drive market, and adding social media marketing. Motion passed unanimously. 2. SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEMENT, LLC Community Services Director Hylton presented the staff report, which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Henderson/ Franklin to approve the five-year Golf Course Management Agreement with Landmark Golf Management, LLC as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. COUNCIL CALLED FOR A SHORT RECESS AT 5:36 P.M. MAYOR ADOLPH RECONVENED THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 5:44 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. 3. SELECTION OF SILVERROCK DEVELOPER City Manager Spevacek announced that the developer, Discovery Land, has withdrawn their proposal from consideration for the property. Community Development Director Johnson presented the staff report, which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Public Speaker: Mark Brownstein, La Quinta — Mr. Brownstein spoke in support of Beverly Park Development Group as developer of the first phase of the SilverRock resort development. Public Speaker: Kay Wolff, La Quinta — Ms. Wolff listed dozens of questions for Council to consider in selecting a developer and deciding what should be built on the property. Public Speaker: John Gamlin, Meriwether Companies — Mr. Gamlin gave a brief description of the company's vision and introduced Robert Green of The Robert Green Company who would develop the hotel component. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6 APRIL 16, 2013 Public Speaker: Robert Green, President, The Robert Green Company — Mr. Green provided Council with his company background and a description of hotel developments done by his company. Public Speaker: Seth Sebastian Hoffman, La Quinta — Mr. Hoffman spoke in support of a 40-acre community park on part of the SilverRock property and suggested that it be developed with 365-day use in mind. He suggested uses such as a community pool, an indoor bike park, covered areas, birding opportunities, trails, and collaboration with the YMCA. Council requested clarification from Meriwether Companies and Beverly Park Development Group on aspects of each company's proposal. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Evans/Franklin to select developer Meriwether Companies/Robert Green, with which to enter into a 90-day negotiation period for the first phase of SilverRock Resort development. Motion passed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Franklin, Osborne, Mayor Adolph NOES: Councilmember Henderson Councilmember Henderson said that she was disappointed that Beverly Park Development Group was not given 90 days to reveal his financial commitments and negotiate terms. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS As La Quinta's representative for 2013, Councilmember Franklin reported on her participation in the following organizations' meetings: • COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Franklin) As La Quinta's representative for 2013, Councilmember Henderson reported on her participation in the following organizations' meetings: • CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Henderson) • LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Henderson) • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Henderson) As La Quinta's representative for 2013, Councilmember Evans reported on her participation in the following organizations' meetings: • CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) • CVAG ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) • GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION (TEAL) INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES DATED JANUARY 9, 2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 APRIL 16, 2013 DEPARTMENT REPORTS Public Speaker: Dick Storbo, La Quinta — Mr. Storbo requests that four -seat golf carts be allowed per AB110 and AB1229. City staff will research these bills to see how they apply to La Quinta. Public Speaker: Fritz Bachli, La Quinta — Mr. Bachli spoke about the odors from California Bio-Mass, Inc. Regarding the green dust fence along Washington Street, Councilmember Evans requested that staff explore fencing options. Councilmember Henderson suggested that staff require the owner to use green stabilizer so its application is very visible. Councilmember Osborne said that "play La Quinta.com" came up as No.14 on a Google search and requested that staff do what's needed to get it moved up on searches. Mayor Adolph requested that Code Officers address the compliance issues with the current owner of the Clark property on Adams Street. MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBER'S ITEMS Mayor Adolph reported that the Senior Inspiration Awards event was very successful. Councilmember Henderson thanked Fire Chief Jodie Gray for meeting with a distressed resident on her day off. Councilmember Franklin asked the new reporter for The Desert Sun to introduce himself; Dave Nyczepir did so. PUBLIC HEARINGS — None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Evans/Franklin to adjourn at 8:14 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 APRIL 16, 2013 T:hw 4 4Quurw IT / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITEM TITLE: DEMAND REGISTER DATED MAY 7, 2013 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Demand Register dated May 7, 2013. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: None. FISCAL IMPACT: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC H A DTNTC: Demand of Cash -City $1,674,710.69 Demand of Cash -Successor Agency of RDA $ 7,049.49 Demand of Cash — HA $ 0.00 Demand of Cash — HA Comm $ 0.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: 1 Between City Council meetings, there is a need to pay some routine bills in order to avoid late fees, or to fund payroll and related payroll taxes. These items are listed below: Prepaid Warrants: 99255 - 99280) 99281) 99282 - 99293) 99294) Voids} Wire Transfers} $147,050.26 $ 4,030.29 $ 19,781.26 $ 1,188.00 $ (510.90) $220,799.99 P/R 36843 — 36845) $145,980.37 P/R Tax Transfers} $ 39,995.80 Payable Warrants Cont'd: 99155 - 99254) $1,103,445.1 1 $1,681,760.18 In addition, listed below are the most significant expenditures being paid on the regular demand register. Significant Expenditures Vendor: Riverside Co Sheriff Tylin International Kasa Construction ALTERNATIVES: None. Respectfully submitted, Account #: Various Amount $892,823.05 401-1762-551.34-04 $ 75,005.85 401-1870-551.45-01 $102,729.20 Report prepared by: Sandra Mancilla, Account Technician Report approved for submission by: Robbeyn Bird, Finance Director Attachments: 1 . Wire transfers 2. Demand Register Report Purpose: Jan -Feb Police Svc. Adams Bridge Proj. Fred Waring Proj. ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA BA TRANSACTIONS 4/10/13 4/23/13 4/12/13 WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 4/12/13 WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 4/12/13 WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 4/16/13 WIRE TRANSFER - TASC 4/19/13 WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK TOTAL WIRE TRANSFER OUT $7,884.85 $43,644.45 $292.50 $906.85 $168,071.34 $220,799.99 PREPARED04/11/2013, 16:45:03 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 63 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK -------------------------------------`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE - REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO -------------------------------------`-----------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------._ NO ',. NAME. NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99255 4404 BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.42-17 - 85.61 85.61 * 85.61 99256 133 CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE PR PR0412 04/12/2013 101-0000-209.49-00 106.00 106.00 * 106.00' 99257 4115 CHECKMATE TELEPHONE EXCHA 001775 04/12/2013 101-5006-426.51-07 179.37 179.37 * 179.37 99258 268 -COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI 001779 04/12/2013 101-7006-431.32-15 125.00 001779 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-07 303.50 001780 04/12/2013 101-3004-451.41-16 170.05 001781 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.41-16 588.26 001782 04/12/2013 101-3006-451.41-16 104.31 - 001783 04/12/2013 101-7006-431.32-15 244.02 001784 04/12/2013 101-7004-431.41-19 6,288.67 001785 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-04 436.04 001786 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-14 475.98 001787 04/12/2013 101-3002-451.41-16 239.86 001788 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.41-16 110.06 9,085.75 x 9,085.75 99259 3044 COMMAND ONE SECURITY 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.30-30 66.00 _ 66.00 x 66.00 99260 6506 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES 001789 64/12/2013 218-0000-421.43-88 44.25 44.25 x 44.25 99261 4899 FG CREATIVE INC 001789 04/12/2013 101-1003-413.55-07 5,000.00 - - 5,000.00 * 5,000.00 99262 940 FUELMAN - 001789 04/12/2013 501-0000-511.43-34 848.23 848.23 ■. 848.23 99263 136 GAS COMPANY; THE 001775 - 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.41-13 73.07 001775 04/12/2013 101-5008-419 41-13 352 25 001775 04/12/2013 101-3002-451.41-13 99264 36 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 001792 04/12/2013 101-7093-431-.56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 _ 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431:56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431,56-52 - _001792 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 - 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 - 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 113.72 539.04 x 13.58 56.84 10.23 10.23- 49.56 57.74 48.39 4.07 21.56 20.50 232.23 539.04 PREPARED04/11/2013, 16:45:03 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM346L CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REPORT NUMBER 63 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99264 36 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-46 23..63 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 10.23 001792 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 16.25 001792 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 20.47 - 575.05 * 575.05 99265 3427 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS. 001792 04/12/2013 101-1001-411.56-02 64.76 001792 04/12/2013 101-1001-411.51-01 47.52 112.28 * 112.28 99266 269 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 001773 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-53 48.76 001774 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-56 2,857.29 001774 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.41-01 387.20 001.775 0.4/12/2013 401-1870-551.45-01 62.87 001775 04/12/2013 101-3004-451.41-01 3,366.94 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-51 5.19 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-52 2,541.48 - 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-54 1,234.43 - 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-59 505.05 ' 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-61 31050.89 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-63 5.19 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-65 - 17.18 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-66 4.11 001775 04/12/2013 101-3005-451.40-62 74.90 001775 04/12/2013 101-3006-451.41-01 753.35 001775 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.41-01 7,104.37 001775 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.41-01 544.25 001.776 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.41-01 644.19 001777 04/12/2013 101-7004-431.41-04 1,010.50 001778 04/12/2013 101-7004-431.41-07 405.93 24,624.07 * 24,624.07 99267. 6883 KASA. CONTRUCTION 001789 04/12/2013 401-1870-551.45-01 102,729.20 102,729.20 * 102,729.20 99268 37 LOWE'S HOME. IMPROVEMENT W 001790 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.43-61 - 21.97 001790 04/12/2013 101-3002-451.43-01 21.49 001790 04/12/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 32.81 001790 04/12/2013 101-7006-431.56-02 162.23 001790 04/12/2013 501-0000-511.43-40 7.67 001790 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 32.79 001790 04/12/2013 101-7006-431.56-02 33.84 001791 04/12/2013 101-5055-422.43-61 107.56 - 001791 04/12/2013 101-4000-341.30-00 54.30- 366.06 * 366.06 99269 40 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 001789 04/12/2013 101-4002-415.41-25 526.44 526.44 * 526.44 99270 2954 NEXTEL GANG TASK FORCE 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.41-22 101.01 PREPARED04/11/2013, 16:45:03 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 3- PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA 9UINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 63 BANK00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------- NO NAME NO NO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99270 2954 NEXTEL GANG TASK FORCE 101.01 ■ 101.01 99271 6509 PARA, LETICIA 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.30-15 100.00 100.00 * 100.00 99272 6568 SPARKLETTS GANG TASK FORC 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.56-02 27.00 27.00 * 27.00- 99273 2938 STAPLES GANG TASK FORCE 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.56-01 190.86 - - 190.86 * 190.86 99274 2816 TIME WARNER -GANG TASK FOR 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421,42-16 57.93 57.93 * 57.93 99275 6720 TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY 001789 04/12/2013 101-5008-419.41-30 642.84 642.84 * 642.84 99276. 63 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT PRO412 04/12/2013 101-0000-209.81-0.0 45.00 45.00 * 45.00 99277 2956 VERIZON CA - GANG TASK FO 001789 04/12/2013 218-0000-421.41-22 446.24 446.24 * 446.24 99278 2290 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 001789 04/12/2013 101-5054-421.41-22 280.04 280.04 * 280.04 99279 68 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 001789 04/12/2013 101-4002-415.41-22 79.99 79.99 * 79.99 99280 753 WIRELESS WATCHDOGS 001789 04/12/2013 101-4002-415.41-25 192.00 192.00 * 192.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 147,050.26 147,050.26 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 147,050.26 147,050.26 PREPAREDO4/12/2013, 10:29:51 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1' PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA 9UINTA, CALIFORNIA - REPORT NUMBER 64 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------- NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99281 5969 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVA 001794 04/12/2013 101-0000-203.10-00 - 4,071.00 001795 04/12/2013 101-6000-343.98-00 40.71- 4,030.29 4,030.29 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 4,030.29 4,030.29 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 4,030.29 4,030.29 PREPARED04/18/2013',. 15:55:17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 65. BANK 00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. WELLS FARGO BANK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT .(NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 98933* 5188 LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES 001538 03/12/2013 101-5054-421.36-50 510.90- 510.90- � VOIDED 99282 15 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 001813 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.43-59 79.08 - 79.08 ■ 79.08 99283 268 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI 001799 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.40-01 934.04 001800 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.40-04 64.85 001801 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.40-09 27.96 001802 04/19/2013 101-3005-451,40-12 2,550.28 001803 04/19/2013 101-5055-422.41-16 116.25 001804 04/19/2013 101-7004-431.41-19 1,621.12 001805 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.40-06 147.82 - 5,462.32 * 5,462.32 99284 5011 DISH NETWORK 001813 04/19/2013 101-5056-425.33-43 54.72 54,72 x 54.72 99285 7026 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARC 001813 04/19/2013 101-0000-203.15-00 233.10 _ 233.10 x 233.10 99286 3427 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 001813 04/19/2013 101-1004-413.53-05 62.13 62.13 ■ 62.13 99287 269 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 001806 04/19/2013 101-5054-421.41-01 118.45 001806 04/19/2013 101-5054-421.41-01 37.87 001807 04/19/2013 101-3002-451.41-01 1,032.13 001808 04/19/2013 101-7003-431.41-01 24.82 001809 04/19/2013 101-7004-431.41-04 2,112.22 001810 04/19/2013 101-7004-431.41-07 1,040.23 - 001811 04/19/2013 101-7004-431.41-04 2,331.39 001812 04/19/2013 101.-7004-431.41-07 1,148.22 7,845.33 * 7,845.33 99288 56 TIME WARNER CABLE.. 001813 04/19/2013 101-5055-422.41-01 57.93 57.93 x 57.93 99289 4621 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 001813 04/19/2013 501-0000-511.43-34 2,731.80 - 2,731.80 * 2,731.80 99290 5228 VERIZON BUSINESS 001813 04/19/2013 101-5054-421.41-22 43.82 - 43.82 x 43.82 99291 2290 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 001797 04/19/2013 101-7004-431.41-04 44.22 001798 04/19/2013 101-3005-451.40-16 40.65 001798 04/19/2013 101-5054-421.41-22 280.11 001798 04/19/2013 101-4002-415.41-22 155.33 520.31 x 520.31 99292 1742 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA 001798 04/19/2013 101-0000-209.45-00 1,266.70 PREPARED04/18/2013', 15:55:17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 65 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK --------------- CHECK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT CNET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99292 1742 VISION SERVICE PLAN - {CA 1,266.70 1,266.70 99293 274 WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CARD 001814 04/19/2013 101-1001-411.51-01 23.91 001815 04/19/2013 101-1002-413.51-01 210.45 001816 04/19/2013 101-1004-413.51-01 171.42 001817 04/19/2013 101-2001-411:51-01 375.00 001818 04/19/2013 101-3001-451.33-04 323.26 001819 04/19/2013 101-5004-424.56-02 196.00 001820 04/19/2013 101-6001-463.51-01 70.00 001821 04/19/2015 502-0000-512.33-52 53.98 1,424.02 1,424.02 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 19,270.36 19,781.26 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 19,270.36 19,781.26 PREPARED04/18/2013', 17:21:52 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,'. CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 66 BANK 00 WELLS FARO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO .NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) .TOTAL 99294 7027 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AIRPO 001823 04/19/2013 401-1813-551.35-07 1,188.00 1,188.00 ■ 1,188.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 1,188.00 11188.00 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 1,188.00 11188.00 PREPARED04/23/2013, 16:51:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM346L - ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99295 2 ACE HARDWARE 001826 04/23/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 4.51 - 001827 04/23/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 65.87 001827 04/23/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 12.93 001827 04/23/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 694.81 778.12 x 778.12 99296 7032 ALEXANDER, ELAINE 001886 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 500.00 500.00 x 500.00 99297 5170 ALSCO INC 001844 04/23/2013 10177003-431.44-07 88.56 001845 04/23/2013 101-7003-431.44-07 88.56 177.12 x 177.12 99298 6857 ALTUM GROUP, THE 001835 04/23/2013 401-1813-551.35-07 600.00 600.00 x 600.00 99299 5016 ALVAREZ,-MARIA ISABEL 001837 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 614.60 614.60 x 614.60 99300 296 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-31 123.24 123.24 x 123.24 99301 3592 ANDERSON COMMUNICATIONS, 001864 04/23/2013 101-5006-426.56-28 899.64 899.64 x 899.64 99302 6856 AUTOZONE 001843 04/23/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 6.47 6.47 x 6.47 99303 18 BANG INC, DAVE 001851 04/23/2013 101-3005-451.56-37 2,501.00 2,501.00 x -2,501.00 99304 3726 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 001867 04/23/2013 101-4001-415.31-13 1,500.00 1,500.00 x 1,500.00 99305 7037 BERGER, CHERYL $ TERJE 001886 04/23/2013 101-5000-322.20-00 20.00 20.00 x 20.00 99306 1499 BEST SIGNS INC 001867 04/23/2013 101-3005-451.56-52 503.58 503.58 x 503.58 99307 300 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-31 51.76 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-31 215.80 267.56 x 267.56 99308 3274 SODDEN,RENATE 001837 - 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 109.90 109.90 x 109.90 99309 21 CARQUEST 001825 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-46 155.34 155.34 x 155.34 PREPARED04/23/2013., 16651:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 PROGRAM: GM34W ACCOUNTING PERIOD - 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,. CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99310 947 CASSEL, LLORA 001837 04/23/2013 101-3003-451.33-43 134.40 134.40 a 134.40 99311 22 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 001864 04/23/2013 502-0000-512.56-22 48.09 - 48.09 x 48.09 99312 4115 CHECKMATE TELEPHONE EXCHA 001864 04/23/2013 101-7003-431.56-52 .74 .74 ■ .74 99313 845 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPAR 001853 ,04/23/2013 101-3001-451.33-13 672.00 '. 672.00 x 672.00 99314 6151 DAVID, MIRIAM 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 472.50 472.50 ■ 472.50 99315 6985 DEAN, ALEXANDER 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 50.00 ■ 50.00 99316 72 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES 001852 04/23/2013 101-4002-415.43-22 578.82 578.82 ■ 578.82 99317 211 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING CO 001876 04/23/2013 101-7001-431.32-07 289.40 001877 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.55-01 400.58 001878 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.55-01 204.38 - 001879 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.55-01 217.46 001880 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.55-01 208.74 1,320.56 ■ 1,320.56 99318 2583 DESERT SUN, THE 001853 04/23/2013 101-2001-411.53-04 49.68 49.68 ■ 49.68 99319 7033 DORHOUT, ARNOLD 001883 04/23/2013 101-3000-342.70-00 35.00 35.00 * 35.00 99320 2585 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 001873 04/23/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 53.29 53.29 53.29 99321 6160 EAST COUNTY CHILD CARE CO 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 200.00 200.00 ■ 200.00 99322 6598 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS 001864 04/23/2013 101-5056-425.33-43 15,000.00 15,000.00 ■ 15,000.00 99323 1474 ESGIL CORPORATION 001864 04/23/2013 101-5002-424.33-28 1,113.28 1,113.28 * 1,113.28 99324 7034 FAAS, ANDREW 001883 04/23/2013 101-3000-342.70-00 35.00 '.. 35.00 ■ 35.00 99325 -6630 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATIN 001853 04/23/2013 101-3005-451.43-59 203.00 PREPARED04/23/2013, 16:51:39 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 3 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,. CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER ----------------------------------------------------------------------- P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99325 -6630 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATIN 203.00 x 203.00 99326 31 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 001864 04/23/2013 101-4002-415.56-27 53.95 53.95 x 53.95 99327 1896 FLAGS A FLYING 001850 04/23/2013 101-3006-451.43-01 135.00 - 135.00 x 135.00 99328 6982 FULTON DISTRIBUTING 001846 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-52 677.45 677.45 x 677.45 99329 7038 GALLEGOS, MARIA 001886 04/23/2013 101-1000-321.00-00 3.00 3.00 x 3.00 99330 6823 HERRIS, NICOL 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 - 35.00 35.00 x 35.00 94331 141 HF&H CONSULTANTS, LLC 001864 04/23/2013 101-1004-413.33-22 735.75 735.75 x 735.75 99332 6341 HONDA YAMAHA OF REDLANDS 001870 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-50 128.48 001871 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-50 353.76 001872 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-50 271.33 753.57 x 753.57 99333 7039 HYUNDAI OF LA QUINTA 001886 04/23/2013 101-6000-322.36-00 100.00 100.00 x 100.00 99334 7036 IOTA GRIFFIN LLC - JIM ST 001886 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.10-00 - 500.00 500.00 x 500.00 99335 6990 IRC INC 001867 04/23/2013 101-1004-413.32-07 104.15 104.15 x 104.15 99336 3184 JOHNSON, LES 001829 04/23/2013 101-6002-463.51-01 70.83 70.83 x 70.83 99337 5714 LA QUINTA FARMS LLC 001867 04/23/2013 101-7006-431.32-15 23,505.98 23,505.98 x 23,505.98 99338 1905 LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEMENT 001841 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.34-10 5,287.00 5,287.00 x 5,287.00 99339 80 LOCK SHOP INC, THE 001835 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.43-01 82.43 82.43 x 82.43 99340 6963 LUNDEEN, MARK 001829 04/23/2013 270-0000-451.74-80 10,000.00 10,000.00 x 10,000.00 99341 4425 MARTIN, PANDARA 001837 04/23/2013 101-3003-451.33-43 273.00 PREPARED04/23/2013, 16:51:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 4 PROGRAM: GM346L - ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67' BANK00 WELLS FARGO BANK ---------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER --•---------------------------------_-------------------------------------. P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO .ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99341 4425 MARTIN, PANDARA 273.00 x 273.00 99342 7035 MATTEUCCI, DEREK 001886 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.10-00 500.00 500.00 x 500.00 99343 6227 MCAULIFFE & COMPANY INC 001864 04/23/2013 101-5008-419.43-88 1,725.47 1,725.47 x 1,725.47 99344 547 HEEDS, WAYNE 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 200.00 200.00 x 200.00 99345 2624 MOWERS PLUS INC 001842 04/23/20.13 101-7004-431.56-52 190.50 190.50 x 190.50 99346 6505 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES IN 001864 04/23/2013 101-5056-425.41-25 151.72 151.72 x 151.72 99347 1065 NIETO, RUBEN 001848 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-43 547.00 547.00 x 547.00 99348 5770 OAKES, JOSEPH A 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 343.00 343.00 x 343.00 99349 41 OFFICE DEPOT 001865 04/23/2013 502-0000-512.56-22 83.97 001866 04/23/2013 101-1004-413.56-01 14.70 001867 04/23/2013 101-4002-415.56-07 434.70 - 533.37 x 533.37 99350 130 ON-TRAC 001874 04/23/2013 101-4002-415.51-31 10.70 10.70 x 10.70 99351 6680 PACIFIC WEST INDUSTRIES 001849 04/23/2013 102-0000-451.43-52 2,940.00 2,940.00 x 2,940.00 99352 7028 PAINTED COVE HOA 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 100.00 100.00 x 100.00 99353 4626 PALM DESERT CYCLERY, INC. 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-34 64.31 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-34 232.20 001829 04/23/20,13 101-5054-421.36-34 26.95 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-34 135.43 001829 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-34 68.62 527.51 x 527.51 99354 7029 PATTON, JANNA 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 50.00 x 50.00 99355 7009 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE .INC 001838 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-40 449.20 001838 04/23/2013 501-0000-511.43-40 1,987.23 2,436.43 x 2,436.43 PREPARED04/23/2013, 16:51:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK. REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 5 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK ----------------`-----------------•_-----------------------------_------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99356 5663 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYST 001840 04/23/2013 101-7001-431.32-07 33.07 33.97 w 33.07 99357 2767 POWERPLAN 001838 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-52 8.93 8.93 z 8.93 99358 43 PRINTING PLACE, THE. 001864 04/23/2013 101-5002-424.53-01 236.52 236.52 * 236.52 99359 325 PSOMAS INC 001837 04/23/2013 401-1870-551.34-04 8,900.00 8,900.00 * 81900.00 99360 7031 RAMIREZ, BRENDA 001884 04/23/2013 101-3000-342.60-00 65.00 001885 -- 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 - 115.00 ■ 115.00 99361 6816 RAMOS, DON D 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 221.20 221.20 x 221.20 99362 254 RASA/ERIC NELSON 001864 04/23/2013 101-7002-431.33-34 190.00 001864 04/23/2013 101-7002-431.33-34 380.00 - '.. 001864 04/23/2013 101-7002-431.33-34 - 285.00 - 001864. 04/23/2013 101-7002-431.33-34 450.00 1,305.00 10305.00 99363 4583 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF 001854 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-01 510,318.61 001855 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-03 82,208.92 001856 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-23 16,964.80 001857 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-22 29,564.80 001858 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-04 98,603.72 001859 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-19 68,173.40 001860 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-13 9,243.20 001861 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-15 9,243.20 001862 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-07 32,650.80 001863 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.36-25 35,851.60 892,823.05 ■ 892,823.05 99364 6246 ROJAS TKD 001837 04/23/2013 101-3003-451.33-43 2,236.50 2,236.50 ■ 2,236.50 99365 45 RUTAN & TUCKER 001888 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 1,287.29 001889 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 8,772.78 001890 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 3,705.38 001891. 04/23/2013 241-9101-705.32-01 86.57 001892 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 5,120.00 001893 04/23/2013 237-9001-702.32-01 2,880.00 001894 04/23/2013 401-1813-551.35-07 1,047.85 001895 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 96.00 001896 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-01 120.00 001897 04/23/2013 401-1815-551.45-01 24.00 PREPARED04/23/2013., 16:51:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 6 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,I-CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK00 WELLS FARGO BANK -----------------------------.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO -- NO -----------NAME -------_---.--- --NO NO - -ACCOUNT---------(NET-OF DISC/RETAIN) -- ----- TOTAL_- 99365 45 RUTAN & TUCKER 001898 04/23/2013 237-9001-702.32-01 4,169.49 001899 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-04 3,326.38 001900 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.10-00 240.00 001901 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.10-00 72.00 001902 04/23/2013 101-1001-411.32-04 948.45 31,896.19 x 51,896.19 99366 5798 SHARK POOLS INC 001835 04/23/2013 101-3006-451.41-16 89.25 89.25 x 89.25 99367 7040 SILLIN, STEVEN 001886 04/23/2013 101-6000-322.28-00 100.00 100.00 x 100.00 99368 4249 SILVERROCK RESORT 001830 04/23/2013 220-0000-431.56-02 162.00 001831 04/23/2013 101-1002-413.56-02 9.00 - 001832 04/23/2013 101-3003-451.56-02 5.00 001833 04/23/2013 101-5054-421.56-02 68.00 001834 04/23/2013 101-0000-203.04-00 49.00 293.00 x 293.00 99369 46 SMART & FINAL 001875 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.56-02 41.74 41.74 x 41.74 99370 463 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 001838 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-52 269.44 '269.44 x 269.44 99371 3537 SQLANO PRESS BOOKS 001829 04/23/2013 101-7002-431.53-04 115.24 115.24 x 115.24 99372 647 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY M 001868 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.41-30 310.85 001868 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.41-30 115.56 426.41 x 426.41 99373 4791 SOUZA, DEBRA'A FEDOR 001836 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.33-43 78.40 _ 78.40 x 78.40 99374 48 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 001828 04/23/2013 101-5001-424.56-01 36.48 001828 04/23/2013 101-4002-415.56-27 98.26 001828 - 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.56-01 34.54 001828 04/23/2013 101-6001-463.56-.01 135.22 001828 04/23/2013 101-3001-451.56-01 52.75 001828 - 04/23/2013 101-3001-451.56-01 6.97 001867 04/23/2013 101-3001-451.56-01 93.14 457.36 x 457.36 99375 6062 STROKE RECOVERY CENTER 001847 04/23/2013 101-3002-451.56-02 600.00 600.00 x 600.00 99376 179 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR. INC 001867 04/23/2013 502-0000-512.43-13 800.00 800.00 x 800.00 PREPARED04/23/2013'., 16:51:39 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 7 PROGRAM: GM346L ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2013/10 CITY OF LA QUINTA,CALIFORNIA REPORT NUMBER 67 BANK 00 WELLS FARGO BANK -----------.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------`-------------------------. CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 99377 53 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 001881 04/23/2013 101-0000-203.05-00 1,837.00 001882 04/23/2013 101-4000-341.30-00 154.00- 1,683.00 * -1,683.00.. 99378 57. TOPS'N BARRICADES INC'. 001829 04/23/2013 101-7003-431.56-46 79.43 79.43 79.43 99379 7030 TORRES, MARGARITA 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 50.00 ■ 50.00 99380 1073 TYLIN INTERNATIONAL 001837 04/23/2013 401-1762-551.34-04 75,005.85 75,005.85 * 75,005.85 99381 5547 US TAEKWONDO TEAM 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 50.00 * 50.00. 99382 6601 VAN FATTEN, SARA 001883 04/23/2013 101-0000-228.30-00 50.00 50.00 * 50.00 99383 2431 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 001828 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-02 97.20 001828 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-02 98.94 001828 04/23/2013 101-7004-431.56-02 48.60 001867 04/23/2013 101-3005-451.56-52 206.10 450.84 * 450.84 99384 3169 VISION INTERNET PROVIDERS 001867 04/23/2013 502-0000-512.33-52 417.15 417.15 * 417.15 99385 7012 VORWALLER & BROOKS INC. 001835 04/23/2013 101-3006-451.43-01 325.00 325.00 * 325.00 99386 6981 WATERLOGIC USA FINANCE IN 001853 04/23/2015 101-4002-415.56-29 226.80 226.80 * 226.80 99387 201 YOUNG ENGINEERING SVC 001864 04/23/2013 101-5002-424.33-28 2,765.00 2,765.00 * 2,765.00 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 1,303,445.11 1,103,445.11 ALL HANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 1,103,445.11 1,103,445.11 PREPARED 04/18/2013, 11:15:29 CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA PAGE 1 PROGRAM: GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 110 GROUP NUMBER 01855 VOID CHECK GROUP - ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/2013 GROUP USER ID SMANCILLA GROUP CREATED BY SMANCILLA GROUP UPDATED BY SMANCILLA TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR SEQ VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS DISC/RETAINAGE WORK ORDER JOB# FACILITIES ID ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100 04/18/2013 001538 00 101-5054-421.36-50 0005188 00 LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES 157509IN 510.90 OTS GRANT 0.0/00/0000 0098933 03/12/2013 N GROUP TOTALS COUNT.. I AMOUNT: 510.90- OF'IK�''9k/ AGENDA CATEGORY: IT SA41A/FAMEETINGDATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE FINANCE CONSENT CALENDAR: 2 DIRECTOR TO ATTEND THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 2013 ANNUAL STUDY SESSION: CONFERENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, PUBLIC BEARING: JUNE 2-5, 2013 RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve authorization of overnight travel for the Finance Director to attend the Government Finance Officers Association 2013 Annual Conference in San Francisco, California, June 2 — 5, 2013. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2013 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) annual conference is being held in San Francisco, California June 2 through June 5, 2013. This conference provides valuable information and training on specific topics and upcoming changes in Government Accounting Standards. In addition, the sessions qualify as continuing professional education to maintain the Finance Director's Certified Public Accountant license. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost is approximately $1,000, which includes air and ground transportation, lodging and meals. Funds are available in the 201 2/2013 finance budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The three-day 2013 GFOA Annual Conference focuses on financial issues affecting local governments. The conference provides education and training for current local government practices as well as any future changes to current practices. In addition, the Finance Director position requires an active CPA license. A minimum of 80 hours of continuing professional education every two years is needed to accomplish this. This conference provides the eligible continuing education hours to achieve this requirement. ALTERNATIVES: Not allow the Finance Director to attend this conference and require the Director to obtain the continuing professional education credits in another manner. Given the acute need to revamp the City's financial system and software, this option would preclude the Finance Director from receiving valuable input that would assist with these endeavors. Respectfully submitted, Report prepared by: Robbeyn Bird, Finance Director Report approved for submission by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachment: 1. GFOA 2013 Annual Conference Registration 107th GFOA Annual Conference • San Francisco, California • June 2-5, 2013 Please remove this registration form, fill it out, and fax it to the GFOA, Fax: (312) 977-4806. OR scan the completed form and e-mail it to: conference@GFOA.org. You can also register online at: www.gfoa.org. 1. Conference/ Preconference Registration 4. Preconference Seminar Registration Please print Or type. If you are faxing this form DO NOT MAIL ORIGINAL. Faxes are Preconference seminar registration and fees are separate from annual conference accepted with credit card payments only. Please affix your mailing label here, and make registration and fees. Check the seminar(s) of your choice: any changes to your record in the spaces provided below. ❑ Reinventing the Revenue Forecasting Process May 31, 2013 • YP day • 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. MI Title/Position Organization/Company City State/Province Zip/Postal Code Country Telephone ❑ The Future is Now: Your New Role as a Finance Pro! May 31, 2013 • YP day • 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. ❑ New Approaches to Capital Asset Management June 1, 2013 • YP day • 8:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. ❑ The New Pension Accounting: What Policymakers Need to Know and How They Need to Respond, June 1, 2013 • YP day • 8:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. ❑ Making a Cost -Effective Financial or ERP System Decision June 1, 2013 • YP day • 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. ❑ Using Electronic Tools to Encourage Public Involvement in the Budget Process June 1, 2013 • YP day • 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. ❑ Get Lean: Making Government Better, Faster, and Cheaper (this is a full -day seminar) June 1, 2013 • Full day • 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. ( _) Check rate below: Each half -day seminar Each full -day seminar Fax Government Member ❑ $160 Government Member ❑ $310 Private -Sector Member ❑ $185 Private -Sector Member ❑ $335 Nonmember Government ❑ $175 Nonmember Government ❑ $430 E-mail Address (REQUIRED) GFOA Membership # (if available) Nonmember Private Sector ❑ $210 Nonmember Private Sector ❑ $455 5. New Member Member Type* Please Check One: Fees Preferred Name for Badge ❑ Indicate if you are substituting for an active member. ❑ Active Government Member ❑ Member Private Sector Name of Active Member Print names) of additional guest(s). Please attach additional names If needed. ❑ Children 12 or Under: Print names) of children) 12 or under. Please attach additional names if needed. Government Member Private -Sector Member Nonmember Government Nonmember Private Sector Student (Full-time, Unemployed only) Retired GFOA members (not currently employed) Full Registration (Postmarked and paid after April 5, 2013) ❑ $475 ❑ $645 ❑ $630 ❑ $920 ❑ $145 ❑ $0 A copy of the confirmation and invoice will be sent as a PDF attachment via e-mail from training@gfoa.org. Please add this address to your allowed senders list. Government Finance Officers Association 203 North LaSalle Street- Suite 2700 -Chicago, Illinois 60601-1210 312-977-9700 - fc, 312-977-4806 - avrvrexffo a.ow *Join the GFOA today and receive $25 off your conference registration fee with a paid new membership. For new membership fee information and an application, please visit www.gyoa.mgor call GFOA at 312-977-9700. All fees payable in U.S. funds except for Canadian governments which may pay membership dues in Canadian funds. Conference Registration: $ Group Discount** Preconference Seminar(s): New member fee: Visit wwwgfoa.org or call GFOA at (312) 977-9700 for fee. $ Discount for paid new member: (-$25.00*) ($ ) Sub Total: $ GFOA San Francisco Fest:#of tickets/adults $40.00 x - #of tickets /children under 18$15.00x - #oftickets /children under 5, Complimentary x = 0 Total Fees: $ **You will receive a 10 percent discount on your conference registration if three or more people from your jurisdiction are attending the annual conference (registrations must be submitted together). This discount does not apply to preconference seminars. ❑ Payment by check: Payable to "Government Finance Officers Association" Send to: GFOA • 3076 Eagle Way • Chicago, IL • 60678-1030 ❑ Payment by credit card, Fax: (312) 977.4806 Send to: GFOA • 203 N. LaSalle St. • Suite 2700 • Chicago, IL • 60601-1210 ❑ Amex ❑ Discover ❑ MasterCard ❑ VISA on Card Number Expiration Date ❑ Bill Me. (Scan and e-mail it to: conference@gfoa.org) P.O. Number: You must include a purchase order number. All billed registrations should be mailed to: GFOA • 203 North LaSalle Street • Suite 2700 • Chicago, IL • 60601-1210 GFOA Fax Number (312) 977-4806 • GFOA Tax ID Number: 36-2167796 Please seethe conference brochure and www.gfm.org forms cancellation and refund policy. See reverse side for hotel registration form. Twy� 4 faQUArw CITY / SAMA HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITEM TITLE: CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT A MODERN ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF EISENHOWER DRIVE AND CALLE SINALOA, PROJECT NO. 2010-11 RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Award a contract to Golden Valley Construction, in the amount of $581,288, to construct a modern roundabout at the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Sinaloa, Project No. 2010-11, and appropriate $464,019 in Development Impact Fee funds. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • The intersection of Eisenhower Drive and Calle Sinaloa (Avenue 52) is currently a four-way stop. Traffic warrants indicate that a traffic signal should be installed to replace the four-way stop. Instead, the City elected to install a modern roundabout. • On March 19, 2013, the City Council approved plans and specifications and directed staff to advertise for construction bids. • Four bids were received; Golden Valley Construction was the low bidder in the amount of $581,288. FISCAL IMPACT: Implementing this project will cost $894,019; $581,288 in direct construction costs and $312,731 in design, decorative light fixture and contingency cost. The Transportation Development Impact Fee (DIF) monies will underwrite this project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The intersection of Calle Sinaloa (Avenue 52) and Eisenhower Drive is the gateway into the La Quinta Cove. As such, consideration was given to improve traffic control with a modern roundabout instead of a traffic signal. Roundabouts significantly reduce serious collisions, reduce traffic noise (from starting and stopping vehicles), and provide for a more aesthetic intersection treatment. On March 19, 2013, the City Council approved the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate, and authorized the roundabout project to be advertised. Council also authorized the expenditure of $30,208.79 for the purchase/preorder of four decorative lights, which were identified for the project and required a long lead time to fabricate. The project was advertised with a base bid area and nine additive alternates. The total estimated project cost was $894,01 9, excluding the entry monument feature, landscape cobble, landscape boulders and median pavers. On April 25, 2013, four sealed bids were received. A detailed bid comparison summary is provided for the City Council's review as Attachment 1. The basis of award for this project is the combined price of the Base Bid Area, plus Additive Alternates 1-9. Golden Valley Construction submitted the lowest responsive overall bid in the amount of $651,560. The award recommendation includes the following items: Base Bid Area: $504,401 Additive Alternate No. 2 — Stamped Concrete Truck Pad: $ 12,944 Additive Alternate No. 4 — Additional 2"-6" Dia. Cobble Stone: $ 2,436 Additive Alternate No. 5 — Furnish & Install 2'-3' Boulders: $ 2,430 Additive Alternate No. 7 — Landscaping and Irrigation: $ 49,600 Additive Alternate No. 9 — Stamped Concrete Median: $ 9,477 Total Award Recommendation: $581,288 The City Council also has the option of awarding two optional additive alternates: Additive Alternate No. 6 — Entry Monument Wall (brass lettering): $28,600.00 Additive Alternate No. 3 — Interlocking Paver Truck Pad: $23,865.50 Additive Alternate No. 3 would replace Additive Alternate No. 2 for an additional project cost of $10,921.15. Contingent upon City Council's approval to award the contract on May 7, 2013, the following is the anticipated project schedule: Project Award May 7, 2013 Sign Contract/Mobilize May 8 — May 31, 2013 Construction (90 working days) June 2013 — October 2013 Accept Improvements November 2013 CHARTER CITY: The project is 100% funded with locally generated Transportation Development Impact and Art in Public Places (APP) funds. As such, the project is not subject to prevailing wage requirements. ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives to the recommended action entail: 1. Elect to enhance the project by constructing an entry monument wall (Optional Additive Alternate No. 6) that would cost $28,600, and appropriate APP funds in the amount of $28,600. 2. Elect to further enhance the project by constructing both the entry monument wall (Optional Additive Alternate No. 6) and installing interlocking pavers (Optional Additive Alternate No. 3) in place of the stamped concrete (Additive Alternate No. 2), appropriate $474,940 versus $464,019 in DIF funds, and appropriate $28,600 in APP funds. Report prepared by: Bryan McKinney, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1 . Bid Comparison Summary Bid Comparison Summery Eisenhower / Celle Sinaloa Roundabout Intersection, CIP 2010 11 Bid Opening Date: April 25, 2013 ATTACHMENT Engineer's Estimate Golden Valley Construction Cooley Construction, Inc Item No Description OTY Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 2 Traffic control 1 LS $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 22,200.00 $ 22,200.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 3 Dust control 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 8,500.to $ 8,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 4 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $ 15000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 8,900.00 $ 8,900.00 5 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Preparation &Implementation 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 6 Sawcut, remove & dispose existing materials per approved design plan 1 LS $ 85,664.00 $ 85,664,00 $ 32,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 73,000.00 $ 73,000.00 Landscape area to be excavated an additional 1' and replace with clean fill material 407 a $ 4200. $ 17,094,00 $ 16.00 $ 6,51200 $ 55.00 $ 22,385.00 8 Construct6" curb only per City Std .#210 1,109 LF $ 25.00 $ 27,725.00 $ 16.00 $ 17,744,00 $ 14.20 $ 15,74780 9 Construct type"C" curb per Qry Std #203 72 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,800.00 10 Construct 6" curb & gutter per City Std .#201 1,097 LF $ 35.00 $ 38,395.to $ 2200 $ 24,134,00 $ 18.00 $ 19,]46.00 11 Construct roundabout rolled curb per detail on design plan 239 LF $ 35.00 $ 8,365.00 $ 20.00 $ 4,780.00 $ 26.00 $ 6,214.00 12 Construct curb amp case "B"per City Std # 250 and detail C on sheet 12 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 1,860.00 13 Construct curb amp case "B"per City Std # 250 and detail D on sheet12 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 1,860.00 14 lConstruct curb transition per Qry Std .#205 55 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,375.00 $ 35.to $ 1,925.00 $ 16.80 $ 924.00 15 Construct sidewalk per ON Std. # 240 (4" depth) 5,099 SF $ 6.00 $ 30,594,00 $ 4,00 $ 20,396.00 $ 3.70 $ 18,866.30 16 Construct dash bin pad (4"depth) 147 SF $ 6.00 $ 88200 $ 5.to $ 735.00 $ 5.80 $ 852.60 17 Construct walkway to existing house (4" depth) 88 SF $ 6.00 $ 528.00 $ 6.25 $ 550.00 $ ].]0 $ 677.60 18 Construct on -site driveway pad (4"depth) 2,108 SF $ 6.00 $ 12,648.00 $ 4,00 $ 8,43200 $ 4.70 $ 9,90760 19 Construct concrete driveway pad within public rightofway(6"depth) 3,642 SF $ 8.00 $ 29,136.00 $ 5.to $ 18,210.00 $ 5.20 $ 18,938.40 20 Construct concrete driveway approach per Qry Std .#221(6"depth) 747 SF 1$ 8.00 $ 5,976.00 $ 5.to $ 3,735.00 $ 5.00 $ 3,735.00 21 Construct trench backFlll and paving per existing street section and dry Std #600, Detail #1 1,819 SF $ 1.75 $ 3,183.25 $ 8.75 $ 15,916.25 $ 5.70 $ 10,368.30 22 Sawcut, remove & dispose exisbngAC/AB max 6"depth 12,530 SF $ 1.50 $ 18,795.00 $ 065 $ 8,144,50 $ 0.86 $ 10,775.80 23 Cold mill 0"- 2" of existing AC pavement 26,016 SF $ 0.45 $ 11,70720 $ 0.45 $ 11,70720 $ 0.38 $ 9,886.08 24 Construct 2" AC base pavement 20 Ton $ 120.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 18].50 $ 3,750.00 $ 215.00 $ 4,300.00 25 Construct 4" AC base pavement 9,925 SF $ 2.90 $ 28,78250 $ 3.15 $ 31,263.75 $ 3.90 $ 38,70 550 26 Construct 2" AC overlay 403 Ton $ 120.00 $ 48,360.00 $ 120.00 $ 48,360.00 $ 104.00 $ 41,912.00 27 Install truncated dome concrete tile per City std #250 174 SF $ 8.00 $ 1,39200 $ 65.00 $ 11,310.00 $ 55.00 $ 9,570.00 28 Construct colored concrete border per detail on design plan, sheet#8 183 LF $ 30.00 $ 5,490.00 $ 25.00 $ 4,575.00 $ 31.00 $ 5,673.00 29 Adustexisting deanout to grade per CV W D Std. 1 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 820.00 $ 820.00 30 Adustexisting MIT to grade per NWD Std. 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,370.00 $ 4,]40.00 31 Adustexisting gate valve to grade per CV W D Std. 2 EA $ 800.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 300.to $ 600.00 $ 850.00 $ 1,700.00 32 Adustexisting storm drain MIT to grade per NWDStd. 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,370.00 $ 4,]40.00 33 Remove & relocate existing mailbox as shown on design plan 6 EA $ 600.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 115.00 $ 690.00 $ 1,380.00 34 Remove existing stop sign & deliver to City yard 3 EA $ 150.00 $ 450.00 $ 150.00 $ 450.00 n$420 $ 252.00 35 Remove & relocate existing Obelisk sign as directed by City Inspector 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $ 840.00 Bid Comparison Summery Eisenhower / Celle Sinaloa Roundabout Intersection, DIP 2010 11 Bid Opening Date: April 25, 2013 Golden Valley Construction CooleyConstruction Inc. $ 6.50 $ 10,51].00 $ ].00 $ 11,326.00 $ 10,51J.00 $ 11,32fi.00 $ 8.00 $ 12,94400 $ 13,944.00 Additive Alternative Bid Item 3 Construct Interlocking pavers truck pad per 50 City Std.# 206 and approved landscape plan 1618 SF $ 25.00 $ 40,450. 00 $ 1475 $ 23,865.50 Total Additive Alternative 3: $ 90,950.00 $ 23,Bfi5.50 $ 290 $ 243600 $ 2,93fi.00 $ 90. 00 $ 2,430.00 $ 2,430.00 $ 28,600. 00 $ 28,600.00 $ 28,600.00 $ 8.00 $ 12,944.00 $ 12,944.00 $ 10.70 $ 17,312.60 $ 17,312.fi0 $ 4.16 $ 3,494.40 $ 3,04.40 $ 68.00 $ 1,836.00 $ 1,836.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 10.00 $ 16,180.00 $ 1fi, 180.00 $ 27.00 $ 43,686.00 $ 43,fi8fi.00 $ 8.00 $ 6,720.00 $ fi,J20.00 $ 135.00 $ 3,645.00 $ 3,fi95.00 $ 21,100.00 $ 21,100.00 $ 21,100.00 TrIStar Contracting I1,Inc. $ 4.91 $ 7,,944.38 $ J,94438 $ 5.82 $ 9,416.76 $ 9,916.76 $ 1280 $ 20, 710.40 $ 20,710.40 $ 450 $ 3,780.00 $ 3,780.00 $ 150.00 $ 4050.00 $ 9,050.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 200000.00 $ 20,000.00 Additive Alternative Bid Item J $ 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ 35,200.00 $ 35,200.00 $ 54,863.00 $ Sq 863.00 including Irrigation stem, Irrigation controller, decomposed [onstructlandscapini, ranite, cobble, shrubs, plants and trees per 54 pproved plan 1 LS $ 39,202.90 $ 39,20290 $ 46,400.00 $ 96, 400.00 Bid Comparison Summery Eisenhower / Celle Sinaloa Roundabout Intersection, CIP 2010 11 Bid Opening Date: April 25, 2013 Engineer's Estimate Golden Valley Construction Item No IDescription I QTY ILJnit lUnit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price 55 180 days landscaping maintenance & plant establishment I 1 I LS $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 Total Additive Alternative J: $ 44,702.90 $ 99,6man Cooley Construction, Inc. Unit Price Extended Price $ 8,100.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 31,700.00 B. W. Simmons, Inc Unit Price Extended Price $ 4,800.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 40,000.00 TrlStar Contracting II, Inc. Unit Price Extended Price $ 12,000.00 $ 12, 000.00 $ 668 33.00 Additive Alternative Bid Item 8 46 1 Construct col or concrete in edia n 1,458 1 SF $ ].00 $ 1Q206.00 $ 5.00 $ 7,290.00 $ 6.40 $ 9,331.20 $ 8.00 $ 11,664,00 $ 5.71 $ 8,325.18 Total Additive Alternative 8: $ 10,206.00 $ ),290.00 $ 9, 331.20 $ 11,fifi9.00 $ 8,325. 18 Additive Alternative Bid Item 9 46a Construct stamped concrete median per City jStd.#720 1 1,458 1 SF $ 9.00 $ 13,12200 $ 6.50 $ 9,47700 Total Additive Alternative 9: $ 13,122.00 $ 9,477.00 Total Additive Alternative Bid Items 19: $ 172,759.90 Total Base Bid Area plus Additive Alternative 19: $ fi95,390.85 Recommended Award Amount: $ 7.00 $ 10,206.00 $ 10,20600 $ 10.00 $ 14,580.00 $ 19,580.00 $ 6.23 $ 9,083.34 $ 9,083.39 $ 14],159.50 $ 121,]SQ20 $ 1]0,519.00 $ 150, 1]3.06 $ 651,560.20 $ 747,665.58 $ ]48,899.20 $ 773,499.50 $ 609,887.70 Tw�t 4 faQmr�rw AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DUDEK FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSENT CALENDAR: 4 SERVICES TO PREPARE THE PLANS, STUDY SESSION: SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN STREET PUBLIC HEARING: IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 2012-07 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Dudek, in the amount of $43,912, for professional engineering services to prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for the Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements, Project No. 2012-07. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • In accordance with the adopted Pavement Management Plan ("PMP"), the following street segments are identified for further analysis and remediation: o Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street o Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Park Avenue o Park Avenue between Calle Tampico and Avenue 50 o Avenue 52 between Washington Street and Cetrino o Avenida Bermudas between Avenue 52/Calle Sinaloa and Calle Nogales • After soliciting a Request for Proposals for design services, staff has reviewed the proposal submitted by Dudek and recommends they be hired to prepare an engineering pavement analysis report, as well as plans, specifications and estimates for repair work. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will result in a PSA for design services at a not to exceed cost of $43,912. These funds are part of the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Capital Improvement Program's PMP funding. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A Pavement Management Update Report, dated August 2012, was prepared by the City's engineering consultant, OMNIS, in order to provide an inventory of City roadways including current conditions, roadway preservation needs, and a roadway improvement funding schedule. As part of the consultant's work, the City is requesting a more in-depth pavement condition report and recommendations on the most cost efficient pavement rehabilitation methods. Specialized testing equipment and a dedicated engineering staff with expertise in pavement repair will be required to produce the report. Staff recommends that Dudek, a qualified engineering consultant, be retained for this work. The City will then use this data to prioritize which street segments should be designed and constructed first. Contingent upon City Council approval on May 7, 2013 to obtain professional engineering services, the following is how the project is expected to proceed: City Council Approval of PSA Authorization to Proceed Engineering Studies Project Design Bidding Process Construction Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES: May 7, 2013 May 8, 2013 May 8, 2013 — June 30, 2013 July 1, 2013 — September 30, 2013 October 2013 December 2013 or January 2014 April/May 2014 Since there is an immediate need to repair these street segments, staff believes this contract approval should not be delayed and is therefore not recommending any alternative action at this time. Report prepared by: Bryan McKinney, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1 . Professional Services Agreement ATTACHMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and Dudek ("Consultant"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services related to the Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements, Project No. 2012-07, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "services" or "work"). Consultant warrants that all services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner in accordance with the standards prevalent in the industry for such services. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations and laws of the City of La Quinta and any Federal, State or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 1.4 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the work to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site of the work and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the work should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the work under this Agreement. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by City, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). Last revised 7-3-12 1.5 Care of Work and Standard of Work. a. Care of Work. Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work performed by Consultant, and the equipment, materials, papers and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of services by Consultant shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Consultant. b. Standard of Work. Consultant acknowledges and understands that the services and work contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Consultant's services and work will be held to a heightened standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.4 hereinabove, Consultant represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the heightened standard of work as set forth in this Agreement. 1.6 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services ("Additional Services") when directed to do so by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforeceable. Failure of Consultant to secure the Contract Manager's written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time due, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, etc. for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Manager. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. 1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in Exhibit "D" (the "Special Requirements"). In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2.0 COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with Exhibit "B" (the "Schedule of Last revised 7-3-12 2 Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Forty-three Thousand, Nine Hundred Twelve Dollars ($43,912.00) (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, payment for time and materials based upon Consultant's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Consultant's overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.6 of this Agreement, "Additional Services." 2.2 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional services approved in advance by the Contract Manager pursuant to Section 1.6 of this Agreement, "Additional Services," shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing by both City and Consultant in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Consultant. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) or less of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater amount of compensation for additional services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council. Under no circumstances shall Consultant receive compensation for any Additional Services unless prior written approval for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer pursuant to Section 1.6 of this Agreement. 2.3 Method of Billing. Any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, Consultant shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Consultant specifying that the payment requested is for work performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City will pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City's Finance Department. 3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. Last revised 7-3-12 3 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in Exhibit C (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the forced delay when and if in his or her judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Consultant to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Sections 8.7 or 8.8 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on May 8, 2013 and terminate on May 30, 2014 (initial term). This agreement may be extended upon mutual agreement by both parties (extended term). 4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK 4.1 Representative of Consultant. The following principals of Consultant are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: a. Charles Greeley, P.E., LEED AP It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Last revised 7-3-12 4 The foregoing principals may not be changed by Consultant and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the service required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall be Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer or such other person as may be designated by the City Manager of City. It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and Consultant shall refer any decisions, which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. 4.5 City Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Consultant only from or through action by City. 5.0 INSURANCE 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Consultant's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for Last revised 7-3-12 5 losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. A certificate evidencing the foregoing and naming City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) shall be delivered to and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. The following policies shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A -:VI: Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence) $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 (per claim and aggregate) Workers' Compensation (per statutory requirements) Consultant shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Consultant, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Consultant, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Consultant's performance under this Agreement. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Consultant's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a Last revised 7-3-12 6 provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Consultant shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. All insurance required by this Section shall be kept in effect during the term of this Agreement and shall not be cancelable without written notice to City of proposed cancellation. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. 5.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Consultant hereunder until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Consultant's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Consultant's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. 5.3 General Conditions pertaining to provisions of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. Last revised 7-3-12 7 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to City. Last revised 7-3-12 8 9. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review: 10. Consultant agrees not to self -insure or to use any self -insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein (with the exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self -insured retention, the deductible or self -insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self -insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 13. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 14. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. Last revised 7-3-12 9 15. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 16. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 17. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. 18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 19. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 20. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such.provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. it is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 21. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. Last revised 7-3-12 10 6.0 INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 General Indemnification Provision. a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or subconsultants), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subconsultants of Consultant. 6.2 Standard Indemnification Provisions. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this section from each and every subconsultant or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from Last revised 7-3-12 11 others as required herein, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this agreement or this section. a. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction. Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, Consultant shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City's active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Consultant will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City. b. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1. Applicability of Section 6.2(b). Notwithstanding Section 6.2(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to Consultants who constitute "design professionals" as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City's agents, officers, officials, employees, representatives, and departments ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or subconsultants), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, any subconsultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone that they control. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section 6.2(b), the term "design professional" shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. Last revised 7-3-12 12 7.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS. 7.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. 7.2 Records. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. 7.3 Ownership of Documents. Originals of all drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials, whether in hard copy or electronic form, which are prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement, shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon termination of this Agreement or upon the earlier request of the Contract Officer, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant shall cause all subcontractors to assign to City any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages suffered thereby. In the event City or any person, firm or corporation authorized by City reuses said documents and materials without written verification or adaptation by Consultant for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said documents and materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Consultant from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the completion of this Contract and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 7.4 Release of Documents. The drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. Last revised 7-3-12 13 8.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety and general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to Section 8.7. 8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Consultant sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Consultant requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Consultant. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or Last revised 7-3-12 14 more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section 8.8 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of. termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 8.3. 8.8 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City as previously stated in Section 8.3. 8.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit from the losing party. 9.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 9.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. Last revised 7-3-12 15 9.2 Conflict of Interest. No officer or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which she or he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or general consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry. 10.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section. To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA Attention: Frank Spevacek, City Manager 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92247 To Consultant: Dudek Attention: Frank J. Dudek, P.E. President 605 3`d Street Encinitas, CA 92024 10.2 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties and all previous understanding, negotiations and agreements are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement. 10.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties by an instrument in writing signed by both parties. 10.4 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be Last revised 7-3-12 16 declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 10.5 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by so executing this Agreement the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Date ATTEST: Susan Maysels, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. Katherine Jenson, City Attorney CONSULTANT:DUDEK Date: Ax,, q, zo/3 Last revised 7-3-12 . 17 Exhibit A Scope of Services The Consultant's Scope of Work, dated May 8, 2013, is attached and made a part herewith. Last revised 7-3-12 18 1.1 Preliminary Engineering & Studies PROJECT MEETINGS We will begin the design related work through initiating a pre -design meeting with City staff to formalize the design approach. The meeting will be a review of project technical requirements and goals, design criteria, establish team roles, the communication process, contract management, schedule, and additional administrative tasks. We will meet with City staff during the development of the design and specifically request meetings at 85% completion and 100% completion. At the 85% completion meeting, we request a field inspection with draft plans in hand. At this meeting, any special construction or conflicts will be discussed. BASE MAP PREPARATION With the proposed improvements anticipated to only include asphalt rehabilitation, a traditionally acquired topographic survey (field data and/or aerial photogrammetry) should not be required for development of a project base map. Vertical control will be established based upon existing conditions in the field (top of curb, flown lines, edge of gutter, etc.) Accordingly, Dudek proposes to utilize simple line diagram base map information, showing existing location of surface features (curb, cross gutters, utilities, etc.) that will impact the project. The base map information will be plotted using any available record drawings (as-builts) and aerial imagery from online resources such as Google Earth. Note, if the City has access to alternate topographic data sources, ie. CVAG aerial imagery or topo, these can also be incorporated into the project base map. Following preparation of the initial base map, a Dudek engineer will walk the full alignment to confirm the accuracy of the data. Any field observations or discrepancies will be incorporated into the basemap data. Using the digital and field verified information, Dudek will prepare a final base map for the project area in AutoCAD 2010 format. The base map will include all above ground utilities (manholes, valves, meters, etc.) and surface features. The base map will form the basis for the preparation of all plan sheets at a scale of 1 "=40' for the following segments: 4 t Avenue 52 Washington Street Cetrino 5Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 Calle Nogales, GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION / ENGINEERING PAVEMENT ANALYSIS REPORT Dudek will contract with Geocon West (Geocon) for preparation of the Engineering Pavement Analysis Report and Geotechnical Investigation.. Geocon will perform coring samples within the proposed improvement corridor using a truck mounted drill rig. Approximately 25 - 30 core samples will be taken through the asphalt and base materials to subgrade. In the event the subgrade soils appear to be loose, or otherwise insufficient a California ring sample of the soil will be collected for laboratory testing. R-values of the subgrade soils will be collected on each roadway. The bores will be backfilled with sand and capped within the base and paving zone with cold -patch asphalt. Concurrent with the field investigation and coring activities, Geocon staff will note the pavement conditions in the vicinity of each bore location, describing the distress, measured offsets, depths, spalling, etc. A report will be prepared providing tabulated information of boring location, thickness of asphalt and base, condition of subgrade, condition of asphalt, any samples collected, and laboratory test data, description of roadway distress, severity, and additional comments. The report will also include a discussion of various rehabilitation methods that could be utilized for the roadways, including complete reconstruction, cold mill and overlay, and slurry seal. These methods will be discussed for applicability in various sections of the roadway depending upon the conditions identified during the field investigation. In addition to the scope description above, Geocon's investigationandreport will include the following: • Mark the proposed coring locations and notify Underground Service Alert (USA) to locate and mark all utilities in the proposed investigation area. Further, the Client/City should provide plans or field locations of existingsubsurfaceutilities prior to our exploration. - • Obtain a no fee encroachment permit from the City of La Quinta for the work. • A'bulk soil sample will be collected of subgrade soils within each roadway (total of 6). • Implement. moving traffic control with the drill rig and the follow up truck during the coring and sampling process. • Perform laboratory testing which is anticipated to include: R-value, and in -situ moisture and density determination. The final laboratory testing program will be based on our observations during the field exploration. As an optional task, Geocon can provide additional coring at roadway locations identified by the City. Providing these additional core samples concurrent with the alignment corridor samples has the benefit if saving the City significant time and expense for future street rehabilitation projects. The City will not have to go through a public procurement process of pay additional mobilization costs. Dudek and Geocon have included up to an additional 16 coring locations as an optional scope item for the proposal. UTILITY COORDINATION Using available utility maps obtained from utilities servicing the project area, Dudek will locate and plot the locations of existing utilities and points of connection. Utility agencies and companies will be contacted to determine if they have any plans to construct new or upgraded facilities in the future. Any planned utility upgrades will be plotted and identified as future facilities. Utilities that will require relocation as part of the improvements will be noted on the base map and within the final improvement plans. All existing surface features (manholes, valves, etc.) that may impact the project or require improvements (adjust to grade, install new collars, etc.) will be field identified, plotted on the project base map, and accounted for in the final design documents. Overhead utilities that may impede the project area will be plotted and noted on the plans as "caution, overhead utilities." 1.2 Design Engineering Services FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PREPARATION Dudek will prepare drawings and specifications suitable for public bid. Pavement rehabilitation plans will be prepared at 40-scale to City of La Quinta and .Green Book Standards, based upon the approved base map data showing existing constraints (curb & gutter, cross gutters, etc.) along the alignment, existing utilities based upon applicable utility owners' records, and property line and right-of-way data. The improvements will be design in conformance with the requirements as laid out in the City RFP, as determined during the initial project meetings, and per the recommendations of the Engineering Pavement Analysis Report. Additional details will include pavement construction and rehabilitations details, compaction requirements, limits of construction, signing and striping information based on the latest edition of the California MUTCD, utility adjustments (to grade, new collars, etc.) as. required, and traffic signal loop replacements. General drawings will be prepared including typical coversheet, general notes, abbreviations and symbols, and general details. Additionally Dudek will. provide construction cost estimating during the progression of the project. Engineer's opinion of probable costs (OPC) will be submitted to the City at each submittal. The accuracy of the OPC will reflect the progress of the design project and percentage complete. Bid document preparation will include a detailed project description, bid schedule, and project specification using standard Green Book format for special provisions and technical specification sections. DELIVERABLES AND REVIEWS Preparation of Deliverables includes internal QA/QC prior to each submittal. The project manager will carry out a detailed review of the project team's work including any subconsultant work. Deliverables at 85% and 100% progress submittals will include up to three (3) full-size sets of progress prints (24" x 36"), three (3) sets of technical specifications, and three (3) copies of the current OPC. Any comments from the review meetings will be incorporated into the subsequent submittal and the final submittal will include one copy of signed mylars, final technical specifications, and a copy of the final cost estimate. Electronic copies of the drawings in AutoCAD 2010 format, the project specifications in Word, and the engineers estimate in Excel will be provided. 1.3 Bidding and Construction Phase Services BIDDING SERVICES During the bid phase of the contract, key Dudek team members will attend a pre -bid conference and job walk for potential bidders, respond to inquiries relative to design issues and prepare and furnish the City with any revisions required. The issuance of bid documents, plans and specifications and any addenda shall be performed by the City. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES During the construction phase of the Contract, the Dudek will provide technical oversight, including responding to request for information (RFI's), reviewing submittals, and reviewing change order requests. Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.2 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Consultant under this Agreement is Forty-three Thousand, Nine Hundred Twelve Dollars ($43,912.00) ("Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Consultant in installment payments made on a monthly basis and in an amount identified in Consultants Schedule of Compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Consultant in conformance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement. Last revised 7-3-12 19 Exhibit B Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Project - Segments 1-3, 5&6 - Dudek Fee Estimate 5/3/2013 Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Consultant shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit "A" of this Agreement in accordance with the attached Project Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Last revised 7-3-12 20 Exhibit C Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Segments 1 - 3, 5 & 6 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Ma 12 un 9 '1 ul 7 LAuu 4 'IS e 1 1Sep 29'r ct 27 'Nov 24 Dep 22 Ua,n tQ Feb 16, War 16 fAp __ _ 211312414 15 261-7 18A1 9J �20 31�11�22�3�1w,t25� ST16I27i�..1��3-Q 1p_2_1I 1 �12123L 6�17 28 C8_f. 1 Project Coordination, Meetings & Submittals 94 days' Wed 5/8113'. Mon 9/16113 2 Pre -Design Kickoff Meeting-- _.... 1 day ...... Wed 5/8/13 Wed S/8/13 5/8 3 City Review Draft Geotech Report 1 day Fri 6/7/13 Fri 6/7/13 O 6/7 ,. 4 Review 85 % Check Plans & Specs Final Bid Documents8/30 (Screen Check) Engineering Pavement Analysis Report 1 day 1 day 34 days Fri 7/26/13 Fri 7/26/13 Mon 9/16/13 Mon 9/16/13 Mon 5/13/13'. Thu 6127113 p 7/26 9 6 7 8 Mark Out Field Sampling & Observations 4days Mon 5/13/13 Thu 5/16/13 9 Lab Analysis & Report Preparation - 15 days Fri 5/17/13. Thu 6/6/13 10 City Review & Comment on Draft Report 10 days Fri 6/7/13 Thu 6/20/13 11 Final Report Preparation Base Map Preparation Data Acquisition Base Map Preparation 5 days 25 days 10 days 15 days Fri 6/21/13 Thu 6/27/13 Thu 519/13, Wed 6112113 Thu 5/9/13. Wed 5/22/13 Thu 5/23/13 Wed 6/12/13 ' .. 12 13 14 15 Utility Coordination, Locating 15 days Thu 5/9/13 Wed 5/29/13 16 Prepare constructioni Documents Prepare 85 % Documents City Review & Comment 85 % Check Prepare 100 % Submittal Documents 58 days 20 days 10 days 15 days, Fri WWI Tue 9/17113i Fri 6/28/13 Thu 7/25/13 Fri 7/26/13- Thu 8/8/13 Fri 8/9/13'. Thu 8/29/13 •••�•••• •••� 17 18 19 20 City Review & Comment 100 % Check 5 days Fri 8/30/13 Thu 9/5/13', 21 -Address City Comments in 100% Submittal 5 days Fri 9/6/13 Thu 9/12/13 22 .... Engineers Opinion of Probable Cast 1 day Fri 7/26/13 Fri 7/26/13 23 Revise Costs 1 day Fri 9/13/13 Fri 9/13/13 24 Prepare Final Bid Documents 2 days Mon 9/16/13 Tue 9/17/13 25 Bid Period Services Technical Support 46 days 20 days Wed 10/9/13 Wed 12/11/13 Wed 10/9/13 Tue 11/5113 26 _T7 Bid Evaluation 10 days Wed 11/6113 Tue 11/19/13 28 Award Construction Contract 1 day Wed 12/11/13 Wed 12/11/13 �1 12/11 29 Services During Construction - - 90 days Thu 12/12/13 Wed 4116/14 wuYor'r+•ww••••••uraw.•••rw.�r:� 30 90 days Thu 12/12/13 Wed 4/16/14 1 Task lWAN1111JEEM Split ,..,,,,::, Duration -only Critical Task 0191NMEREEMM_... External Tasks , 3R Manual Summary Rollup Milestone O Project Summary Q"d`tl.a,,.,.-m.v _ ` Manual Summary Project: Schedule - revised for contrac Summary Wm000mwmm2mQ Group By SummTask "o Start -only C - Date: Mon 4/8/13 Rolled Up Task _.. Inactive Task "_ :.. .- Finish -only 7 Rolled Up Critical Task iffillEMMEMOMM Inactive Milestone .. Progress erwm•wi• Rolled Up Milestone 0 Inactive Summary 7 -- v Critical Task b Rolled Up Progress • Manual Task Page 1 Exhibit D Special Requirements None. Last revised 7-3-12 21 �a� Q•cy� F4 Zfv QuIAS CE`� OF'Tk�'94• CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITEM TITLE: REAFFIRM ADOPTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152, AUTHORIZE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS, AND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FOR LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY PARCELS RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 5 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council to reaffirm adoption of the annual assessment for County Service Area 152 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014, authorize Riverside County to continue to levy assessments, and indemnify and hold the County harmless for levying assessments on City parcels EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • The City has an agreement with Riverside County ("County") wherein the County assesses properties within the City for the maintenance and operations of street sweeping, flood control, retention basin and other drainage activities within the City. • These activities are required under the Clean Water Act and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program. • The assessment rate is $9.99 per Benefit Assessment Unit. For Fiscal Year 2013/2014, the assessment rate per parcel will remain unchanged from its original 1997 rate. • Annually, the City Council must adopt a resolution authorizing the County to assess City parcels and holding the County harmless for levying the assessments. FISCAL IMPACT: County Service Area ("CSA") 152 assessments will generate approximately $253,000 during Fiscal Year 2013/2014. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In 1991, the County enacted CSA 152 to provide funding for local jurisdictions to maintain flood control and storm drain facilities. In 1994, the City joined CSA 152 and in 1997, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the Benefit Assessment Unit rate of $9.99. This agreement is available for review in the Public Works Department. The recommended action continues the City's participation in CSA 152 and authorizes the County to levy and collect these assessments for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. ALTERNATIVES: The City receives approximately $253,000 from CSA 152 assessments and this revenue offsets various flood control and storm drain maintenance costs the City incurs in order to comply with Federal clean water and pollution control requirements. Therefore, staff does not recommend any alternatives to this action. Report prepared by: Edward J. Wimmer, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 2013 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING FINDINGS AND REAFFIRMING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SETTING OF RATES FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 TO FUND THE CITY'S STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM AND OPERATE AND MAINTAIN THE CITY'S DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Service Area 152 (CSA 152) was created under the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 54702, et seq.), which authorized local agencies to impose benefit assessments to finance the maintenance and operation costs of flood control and drainage systems, based on the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel; and WHEREAS, under the federally -mandated but unfunded National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program, the City is required to have a valid permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board to discharge water runoff from properties within the boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, street sweeping is a pro -active method of ensuring pro -active maintenance from street runoff into the flood control and drainage systems of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is a co-permittee of Permit No. CAS-617002 with the Coachella Valley Water District, County of Riverside and the incorporated cities therein: and WHEREAS, the City, by its Resolution No. 97-39, adopted on May 20, 1997, authorized Riverside County to levy and establish a Benefit Assessment Unit rate for the 1 997-1 998 Fiscal Year CSA 152 assessments; and WHEREAS, the City by its Resolution No. 97-39, adopted on May 20, 1997, agreed to indemnify and hold the County harmless for levying Assessments on the City parcels under CSA 152; and WHEREAS, the City uses revenues from CSA 152 assessments solely for the purpose of maintaining and operating the City's flood control and drainage system to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and to provide street sweeping within the City of La Quinta; and Resolution No. 2013- CSA 152 Adopted: May 7, 2013 Page 2 WHEREAS, Proposition 218, adopted by voters on November 6, 1996, established new procedures and approval requirements for all existing assessments, unless the assessment is exempt from the new requirements; and WHEREAS, certain assessments that existed on November 6, 1996, are specifically exempt from the Proposition 218 procedures and approval requirements, including assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs and maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: Section 1 . The City Council finds the foregoing recitals to be true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds and declares that the City's CSA 152 charges are assessments within the definition of California Constitution Article XIIID, Section 2(b), in that they confer special benefits upon each parcel of property subject to the assessments. Section 3. The City Council finds and declares that pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 5(a), the City's CSA 152 assessments are exempt from the new procedures and approval requirements of Article XIIID, Section 4, because the City's CSA 152 assessments existed before November 6, 1996, and the assessments are imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs and maintenance and operation expenses for street sweeping, flood control, and drainage systems in the City. Section 4. The City Council hereby reaffirms its adoption of the annual assessment for CSA 152 and hereby determines that the annual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 for CSA 152 is to be set at nine dollars and ninety-nine cents ($9.99) per Benefit Assessment Unit. The method of computation has not been changed nor has the rate of assessment been increased since August 6, 1996. Section 5. The City Council hereby authorizes the County of Riverside to levy assessments under CSA 152 for the benefit of the City. The City agrees that it shall indemnify, defend and hold County and members of its Board, and its officers, employees and agents harmless from (1) any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever and (2) any and all liability of any kind or nature whatsoever that may arise out of or be caused by, or be attributable to the imposition, collection, or allocation of any tax (special or general), assessment Resolution No. 2013- CSA 152 Adopted: May 7, 2013 Page 3 fees or charges, and/or any other revenue generated through City's application of reliance on or use of County Service Area 152. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 71h day of May, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Tw�t 4 faQmr�rw AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY/ SA/HA /FAMEETINGDATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: SPECIFICATIONS, BID DOCUMENTS y AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISEMENT CONSENT CALENDAR: FOR BID OF THE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC FACILITY STUDY SESSION: IMPROVEMENTS TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING: NOS. 2012-03, 2012-04, AND 2012-05 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the specifications, bid documents and engineer's estimate of probable construction costs, and authorize staff to advertise for bid the Miscellaneous Public Facility ADA Improvements, Project Nos. 2012-03, 2012-04, and 2012-05. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • The La Quinta Park, Civic Center Park, and Library require a variety of upgrades in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) many of which could be performed by a general building contractor without a detailed design. • The Miscellaneous Public Facility ADA Improvements Project is intended to hire a general building contractor to address these deficiencies. Award recommendations will be presented in June 2013. • This project is being financed with QUIMBY and Library funds and is not subject to prevailing wage requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: The engineer's estimate to correct these ADA deficiencies is $153,100. A total of $488,207 is budgeted for City facility ADA improvements in the 2012/2013 Capital Improvement Program. The balance of this funding will be used to correct additional deficiencies once the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate are complete. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In 2011, the City conducted an ADA accessibility self -evaluation of its public facilities and commissioned an Accessibility Survey prepared by Disability Access Consultants. These surveys identified the need for certain ADA improvements at the La Quinta Park, Civic Center Park, and Library. The improvements entail both design and facility deficiencies that can be corrected by a Class B General Building Contractor without additional design or engineering, and site deficiencies which require additional engineering. The project specifications and bid documents addressed in this report correct facility deficiencies that can be corrected by a Class B General Contractor. These improvements will include, but are not limited to, installing accessible benches, installing compliant drinking fountains, mounting compliant signage on buildings, installing accessories on doors to make them accessible, adjusting restroom mirrors, toilets, grab bars, dispensers, and counter heights, installing accessible seating, and other incidental items to comply with current ADA standards. The project specifications and bid documents are now complete and available for review in the City's Public Works Department. Contingent upon City Council's approval to advertise for bid on May 7, 2013, the following is the project schedule: City Council Authorization to Advertise for Bid Project Advertisement Project Award Sign Contract/Mobilize Construction (45 working days) Accept Improvements CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: May 7, 2013 May 8, 2013 — June 6 ,2013 June 18, 2013 June 19, 2013 — July 12, 2013 July 2013 — September 2013 October 2013 The project is being funded entirely with locally generated funds therefore the contractor will not be required to pay prevailing wages on this project. ALTERNATIVES: Since this work is necessary to comply with state and federal law and must be performed by a licensed contractor, staff does not recommend an alternative for bidding these improvements. Report prepared by: Bryan McKinney, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Tit!t 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 7 ITEM TITLE: CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH VINTAGE ASSOCIATES FOR THE PARK LANDSCAPE STUDY SESSION: MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 201 3/2014 PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a one-year contract extension with Vintage Associates for the Park Landscape Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 201 3/2014 and authorize the City Manager to execute the extension of agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • City Council awarded a contract to Vintage Landscape for Park Landscape Maintenance Services for a period of one year with a provision allowing the City to extend the contract with up to four one-year extensions. • This one year contract extension would allow a fourth extension of the agreement with no changes to the contract amount. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this contract is . There are no changes to the contract amount as a result of this extension. The funds for this service will be included in the draft Fiscal Year 2013/2014 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On May 4, 2010, the City Council awarded a contract to Vintage Landscape, a division of Vintage Associates, Inc. for the Park Landscape Maintenance Services in the amount of $388,380. This contract was for a period of one year with a provision allowing the City to extend the contract for four one-year extensions, not to exceed a total contract length of five years. On June 15, 2010, City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $121,920 for the Bear Creek Trail and Seasons Retention Basin to be maintained under the Parks Maintenance Contract. These areas had been maintained under the Lighting and Landscape contract. Due to the recreational uses at these facilities, they were moved to the Park Maintenance contract and paid out of the Lighting and Landscape contract. On September 21, 2010, City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 2 for the maintenance of the sports fields at Colonel Paige Middle School under the terms of the May 18, 2010 Joint Use Agreement with the Desert Sands Unified School District. The annual cost for the maintenance is $26,400. On June 6, 2011, City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 3 for a one- year contract extension with no cost increase. On June 5, 2012, City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 4 for a one- year extension and service reductions for a cost savings in the amount of $43,600. These reductions beginning July 1, 2012 included: Discontinue winter park over -seeding <$13,600> Reducing the tree pruning to safety only <$10,000> Reducing the landscape labor by .5 full time employee <$10,000> Eliminate the Desert ARC Program <$10,000> Contract Change Order No. 5 is for a one-year extension with no changes to the contract amount. Vintage Associates has provided excellent service while maintaining costs. ALTERNATIVES: Should City Council choose not to extend the landscape contract, staff would solicit new bids for the City Park Landscape Maintenance Services. Report prepared by: Steve Howlett, Golf & Parks Manager Report approved for submission by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No. 5 CONTRACT: CONTRACTOR: ced4f 4 44" CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 2009-20 Park Landscape Maintenance Services Vintage Associates, Inc. ATTACHMENT 1 Sheet 1 of 1 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES EFFECTIVE JULY 1. 2013: Contract extension for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. ************************************************************************** Original Contract Amount $388,380 Change Order Nos. 1 through 4 $104,720 Add This Change Order No. 5 $0 Revised Contract Total $493,100 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: The contract completion date is June 30, 2014. ************************************************************************** Submitted By: Approved By: Date: Date: ************************************************************************** We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: Contractor: Vintage Associates, Inc. Date: Tit!t 4 4 a" CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITENITITLE: CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH SANTA FE BUILDING FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 8 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Approve Contract Change Order No. 1 with Santa Fe Building Maintenance for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 for janitorial services in the amount of $1 14,556.20. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • Santa Fe Building Maintenance provides janitorial services for City facilities. • The contract provided a one-year term with the option to extend it for three years. • If approved, the contract would extend one year, eliminate services at one facility and allow for a 2% increase in the original contracted amount. FISCAL IMPACT: Total janitorial expenses for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 were $113,990. Funds will be included in the Draft Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Budget in the amount of $114,556.20 of which the General Fund will underwrite $74,739.48 and the Library Fund will be charged $39,816.72. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On June 19, 2012, City Council awarded a contract to Santa Fe Building Maintenance for a one-year term with the option to extend for three additional years. The facilities to be cleaned under the contract include: City Hall, Library, Senior Center, Museum, Public Works maintenance trailer, Fritz Burns pool office, two park snack bars, and park restrooms. Contract Change Order No. 1 (Attachment 1) includes the following: • One -Year Contract extension; • Eliminate services at Police Substation for a decrease of $1,680; and • Increases Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Contract by 2% for an increase of $2,246.20 ALTERNATIVES: Should City Council choose not to extend the janitorial contract with the increase, staff would solicit new bids for the City janitorial services. Report prepared by: Steve Howlett, Golf & Parks Manager Report approved for submission by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Attachment: 1. Contract Change Order No. 1 CONTRACT: CONTRACTOR: ced4f 4 44" CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Janitorial Services Santa Fe Building Maintenance ATTACHMENT 1 Sheet 1 of 1 Pursuant to the terms of the original Contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original Contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013: One Year Contract Extension Eliminate services for Police Substation ($1,680.00) 2% Cost Increase $2,246.20 ************************************************************************** Original Contract Amount $113,990.00 Add This Change Order No. 1 $566.20 Revised Contract Total $114,556.20 By reason of this contract change order the time of completion is adjusted as follows: The contract completion date is June 30, 2014. ************************************************************************** Submitted By: Date: Approved By: Date: We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses for any delays. Accepted By: Title: Contractor: Santa Fe Maintenance Date: Tit!t 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 ITEXITITLE: LEASE OF OLD FIRE STATION NO. 32 BUILDING TO SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a two-year Lease Agreement between Springs Ambulance Service, Inc. and the City of La Quinta for office space within the old Fire Station No. 32 building and authorize the City Manager to execute the Lease Agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The old Fire Station No. 32 is vacant and Springs Ambulance Service, Inc. (AMR) is interested in leasing 1,200 square feet of office space. The space will house one 24-hour crew and two 12-hour crews, working day and night shifts. Two ambulances and four to six personal vehicles will be on site at any given time. FISCAL IMPACT: Per the Lease Agreement, AMR will pay the City $1,500 per month for rent and utilities. The City will continue to maintain the landscaping and pay the utilities for the building. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In February 2013, AMR requested use of the old Fire Station No. 32 building as a staging area and office for their employees. A local, reputable real estate broker provided comparable lease rates in the vicinity. AMR will be responsible for janitorial cleaning and any improvements including ADA upgrades deemed necessary for their use. Improvements to the facility must be approved by the City. The lease agreement expires on June 30, 2015, and allows for a one-year extension. The proposed lease agreement is included for Council's consideration (Attachment 1). AMR does not need use of the garage; therefore the City will continue to use it for storage space. ALTERNATIVES: Approve the lease agreement with modifications. Report prepared by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Report approved for submission by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Attachment: 1. Lease Agreement ATTACHMENT 1 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (the "Lease") is made effective the _ day of May, 2013 (the "Effective Date"), by and between SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., a California corporation ("Tenant") and THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation ("Landlord"). Landlord hereby leases the property described below to Tenant upon the following terms and conditions: 1. Premises. Landlord is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, with a physical address of 78136 Frances Hack Lane, commonly known as Old Fire Station #32 (the "Landlord Property"). The portion of the Landlord Property that is the subject of this Lease is the west office portions of the building, which consists of 1,212 sq. ft. ("Premises"), Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Premises shall not include the garages or storage areas located on the Landlord Property. The Landlord Property is identified on Exhibit "A" and legally described in Exhibit "B," with both such exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Grant of Lease. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord, the Premises, together with the right to use the parking areas located on the Premises, upon the terms and conditions stated in this Lease. 3. Scope of Lease. (a) Landlord hereby leases the Premises to Tenant for the primary purpose of providing ambulance services. (b) Notwithstanding anything in this Lease to the contrary, Tenant shall not park more than two (2) ambulances and six (6) personal vehicles on or around the Premises at any given time. 4. Term. The Term of this Lease shall commence on May _, 2013 and shall end on April 30, 2014, unless sooner terminated as provided herein (the "Term"). 5. Term Extension. The Term of this Lease may be extended for a period of one (1) year with a written amendment to this Lease approved and executed by both Landlord and Tenant. 6. Rent and Operating Charges. Beginning May _, 2013, and continuing throughout the Term, Tenant shall pay to Landlord monthly rent for use of the Premises in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) ("Rent"). Rent shall be deemed to include all charges and costs for gas, water, and electricity. Tenant shall be responsible to pay all other utilities for the Page 1 of 11 Premises directly to the utility provider of such service. All payments of Rent shall be paid by Tenant on or before the first (1st day of each month without notice or demand from Landlord at Landlord's address as provided by Section 23 below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Term of this lease commences on a date other than the first day of the month, the Rent for such initial month shall be determined on a pro-nata basis. 7. Late Charges. If any of the Rent is not received by Landlord within fifteen (15) days after the first IV) day of each month, then, without any requirement for notice by Landlord, Tenant shall pay to Landlord an additional amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for each day that such Rent is delinquent. 8. Custodian and Maintenance Services. As a condition to this Lease, and at Tenant's sole cost and expense, Tenant shall contract with a custodial service company approved, in writing, by Landlord, in Landlord's sole discretion, to perform custodial services on the Premises during the Term. At Tenant's sole cost and expense, Tenant shall contract with an HVAC contractor to provide quarterly inspections and filter changes. 9. Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement on Premises. (a) Tenant shall not do, or permit anything to be done, in or on the Premises, which in any way will (1) increase the rate of fire insurance on the Premises; (2) invalidate or conflict with the fire insurance policies on the Premises or fixtures or on personal property kept therein; or (3) subject Landlord to any liability for injury to persons or damage to property. (b) Landlord shall not be liable under this Lease to Tenant for injuries to Tenant's person or damage to property occurring on the Premises or to any persons entering the Premises related to Tenants thereon, including, without limitation: (1) a loss of property by theft or burglary; (2) damage or injury to person or property on the Premises; (3) any damage or injury caused by action of the natural elements; or (4) damage or injury resulting from (i) the conduct of Tenant, Tenant's contractors, licensees or invitees, whether negligent or otherwise, or (ii) any other act, event or occurrence in or about the Premises other than the grossly negligent or intentional acts of Landlord or Landlord's employees, contractors, licensees or invitees. Tenant shall not make any claim against Landlord for any loss or damage described in this Section. (c) Upon expiration of the Term, or any earlier termination of this Lease, Tenant shall surrender to Landlord the Premises, including all alterations, improvements and other additions made by Landlord or Tenant, in good order, condition, and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted. Tenant shall also remove any partitions or similar improvement made by Tenant to the Premises (e.g., office spaces, modulars) without any Page 2 of 11 compensation due by Landlord to Tenant or, at Landlord's sole discretion, Tenant shall take the necessary steps to return the Premises to the configuration of the Premises as found by Tenant at the commencement of the Term absent any, or at the request of the City some but not all, of such improvements and in good order, condition, and repair. 10, Improvements. (a) Prior to undertaking any alterations, improvements, or installations of fixtures, Tenant shall submit such proposed alterations, improvements, or installation of fixtures, in writing, to Landlord, and shall obtain the prior written consent thereof from Landlord. Any improvements required pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder shall be the sole responsibility of the Tenant. (b) Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, Landlord shall (i) install smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors within the Premises in quantities and locations as determined by the Landlord's Building Official, and (ii) inspect the water heater at the Premises. If Landlord determines, in its reasonable discretion, that the water heater should be replaced, Landlord shall promptly replace said water heater. 11. Tenant's Insurance. (a) Types. Tenant, at no cost or expense to Landlord, shall procure and keep in full force and effect during the Term, insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth below: (i) Comprehensive general liability insurance with respect to the Premises and the operations of or on behalf of Tenant or its agents, representatives, officers, directors, and employees in, on or about the Premises in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit bodily injury, personal injury, death and property damage liability, subject to such increases in amount as Landlord may reasonably require from time to time. The policy or policies shall include that Landlord and its officers, officials, members, employees, representatives, and agents shall be named as additional insureds under such policy or policies, with an endorsement evidencing same, and shall provide that such policy or policies shall not be terminated unless 30 days notice has been provided to Landlord; (ii) Worker's compensation coverage as required by the laws of the State of California together with employer's liability coverage; and Page 3 of 11 (iii) With respect to the improvements, fixtures, furnishings, equipment and other items of personal property located on or in the Premises, insurance against fire, peril, or flood, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief, and such other additional perils, hazards and risk as now are or may be included in standard "all risk" forms in general use in Riverside County, California, for an amount equal to not less than the full current actual replacement cost thereof. Landlord shall be named as an additional loss payee under such policy or policies and such insurance shall contain a replacement cost endorsement. (b) Standard. All policies of insurance required to be carried by Tenant under this Lease shall be written by responsible and solvent insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of California. A copy of each paid -up policy evidencing such insurance (appropriately authenticated by the insurer) or a certificate of the insurer, certifying that such policy has been issued, provgding the coverage required by this Section and containing provisions specified herein, as well as accompanying endorsements, shall be delivered to Landlord prior to the date Tenant is given the right of possession of the Premises or as Landlord may otherwise require, and upon renewals, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of such coverage. 12. Events of Default. (a) An event of default (an "Event of Default") shall occur under this Lease if: M Tenant shall fail to perform any of the terms, conditions or covenants of this Lease to be observed or performed by Tenant and such failure shall continue for more than thirty (30) days thereafter, unless such default is of a nature that it cannot practically be cured within such thirty (30) day period but can be cured within a reasonable time but in no event later than ninety (90) days, and Tenant is proceeding with due diligence to cure such default; or (ii) Tenant's abandonment of the Premises in a manner not otherwise permitted herein. (b) The failure of Landlord to insist, in any one or more instances, upon a strict performance of any of the covenants of this Lease or to exercise any right or remedy contained herein, shall not be construed as a waiver or a relinquishment for the future of such covenant or option. 13. Termination. Landlord and Tenant can mutually agree to terminate this Lease by way of a written document reflecting the parties' mutual desire to Page 4 of 11 terminate. Tenant or Landlord can unilaterally terminate this Lease upon Tenant's locating and securing a new physical location for its operation. Upon any such aforementioned termination, Tenant shall surrender the Premises, in accordance with the provisions contained in this Lease, no later than the effective date of termination, and pay Rent to Landlord, on a pro rated basis, for each day leading up to the termination date. 14. Tenant's Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole expense and with counsel reasonably acceptable to Landlord, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Landlord and Landlord's officials, officers, members, employees, agents, and representatives (collectively, the "Landlord Representatives"), from and against any and all claims (including demands, losses, actions, causes of action, damages, liabilities, expenses, charges, assessments, fines or penalties of any kind, and costs including consultant and expert fees, court costs and attorney's fees) or liabilities (any of the foregoing, a "Claim') from any cause arising out of or relating (directly or indirectly) to Tenant's use or occupancy of the Premises, the conduct of Tenant's business, or from any activity, work, or thing done, permitted or suffered by Tenant in or about the Premises, and shall further defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Landlord and the Landlord Representatives against and from any and all Claims arising from any breach or default in the performance of any obligation on Tenant's part to be performed hereunder, or arising from any act or negligence of Tenant, or of its agents, employees, visitors, patrons, guests, invitees or licensees, including vendors, servicing Tenant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall not be liable for damage or injury occasioned by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Landlord or its designated agents, servants or employees, unless covered by insurance Tenant is required to provide. Tenant's obligation to indemnify shall include Tenant's payment of reasonable attorneys' fees and investigation costs and all other reasonable costs, expenses and liabilities incurred or suffered by Landlord from Landlord's receipt of the first notice that any Claim is to be made or may be made. Tenant's indemnification obligation hereunder shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease until all Claims against Landlord involving any of the indemnified matters are fully, finally, and absolutely barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. 15. Right to Enter. Landlord shall have the right to enter the Premises (a) at reasonable hours upon prior reasonable notice to Tenant (verbal or written) for any purpose permitted or required by this Lease, including to verify Tenant's compliance with the terms hereof; or (b) at any time that an emergency exists, to examine the Premises or to make such repairs and alterations as shall be reasonably necessary for the safety and preservation of the Premises. 16. Landlord Contact Person. During the Term, Tenant shall direct all questions, concerns, and correspondence regarding repairs or other issues relating Page 5 of 11 17. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant shall not have the right to sublet the Premises, or any portion thereof, or to assign or mortgage Tenant's interest in this Lease, or any portion thereof, without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may be withheld in Landlord's sole and absolute discretion. In the case of any such subletting or assignment approved by Landlord, Tenant shall remain fully obligated to Landlord for the performance of all terms and conditions of this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Landlord may, without Tenant's consent, assign this Lease to any governmental entity with jurisdiction over the Premises. 18. Title. No part of this Lease shall be interpreted as conveying any portion of the title to the Premises or the Old Fire Station #32 to the Tenant. 19. Applicable Laws. Tenant hereby covenants and warrants that Tenant shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, including, without limitation, Landlord's rules and regulations, in connection with its operations on the Premises. 20. Governing Law. This Lease shall be construed and applied in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 21. Severability. Any provision or provisions of this Lease which shalt prove to be invalid, void, or illegal shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other provision, and the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 22. Headings. The headings of the various Sections of this Lease are inserted for reference only and shall not to any extent have the effect of modifying, amending or changing the express terms and provisions of this Lease. 23. Notices. All notices, demands, elections, deliveries and other communications between Landlord and Tenant required or desired to be given in connection with this Lease ("Notices"), to be effective hereunder, shall, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease, be in writing, and shall be deemed to be given and received (a) when delivered personally; (b) upon delivery by a reputable overnight courier service that provides a receipt with the date and time of delivery (e.g., Federal Express), or (c) two (2) days after deposit with the United States Postal Service, prepaid, as certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to Landlord: City of La Quinta Attn: Frank Spevacek, City Manager 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Page 6 of 11 With a Copy to: Rutan & Tucker, LLP Attn: M. Katherine Jenson, Esq. 611 Anton Boulevard, 14th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 If to Tenant: Springs Ambulance Service, Inc. Attn-. Tom McEntee CEO East Region 1111 Montalvo Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Either Landlord or Tenant may from time to time designate another address for the receipt of future Notices by a Notice given as provided in this Section 23 to the other party at the address set forth herein, or as last provided by such other party in accordance with this Section 23. 24. Amendments. Neither this Lease nor any term or provision hereof may be changed orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by Tenant and Landlord. 25. Waivers. No waiver hereunder shall be effective except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which the waiver is sought. 26. Successors and Assigns. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, this Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit, as the case may require, of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. 27. Rules and Regulations. Landlord shall have the right, from time to time, to issue reasonable rules and regulations regarding the use of the Premises. When so issued, such rules and regulations shall be considered a part of this Lease. Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant for the violation of any rules and regulations or the breach of any covenant or condition in any lease by any other tenant of Landlord. 28. Entire Agreement. This Lease contains the entire agreement of the parties with regard to the matters set forth herein. Any other agreements, promises or representations, oral or written, between the parties with respect to such matters are hereby superseded and merged into this Lease. 29. Execution of Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Page 7 of 11 Ni, 3 6k#tatW %&4w99tt iN P&f -t is ham-* ,+; aAyn7wlg d byTwnm that the yralvedonehlra borwo�% LawWwo woJ Vw-wm yi aslas zt�a w a psv'ImemAk of Pint srcritune .kvw 4hafl: Landlix'd a7 W Tao -ant shwas v4 tt. Wrluiaucadi ec Mlp Putga® to tr& eh6 iirrt of -�fi* < of, 2N 4+,tli 4E S 7la1-REOF„ vie tm665 heaeCo rmw smu f ?HE ir.ss urT w,t 7a,'m aze<;uardl n) N- gllo iiia d ea U? 00" Nnts 'fim + ektgo mt=�W?. Ure OF LA. QUINTAj By F+'nnk.F i,lrrvacrk.{'.,tPt.esirir�xs AT7ES? APPROVED AS Tul FURM, W. 'XnC7ra i-M .kHAs - ',: Catty #4.11arat y al L',3MD3r" crJrNfgfiwl P� (+,r9,x A r,.e' EXHIBIT "A" OF THE PREMISES Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDLORD PROPERTY Described as follows: That portion of the Southwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, S.B.M., in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at a point which bears N. 000 05' 01 "E, a distance of 30.00 feet, from the Southeast corner of the West 25 acres, of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence Westerly and parallel with the South line of the said SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, a distance of 150.00 feet; Thence Northerly and parallel with the East line of the said West 25 acres, of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, a distance of 150.00 feet; Thence Easterly and parallel with the South line of the said SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, a distance of 150.00 feet; to a point on the East line of the said West 25 acres, of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4; Thence Southerly along the East line of the said West 25 acres of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, a distance of 150 feet, to the point of beginning. Excepting there from: A portion of the Southwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter of said Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, S.B,M., in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of Section 6, said point being 149.00 feet Westerly from the Southeast corner of the West 25 acres of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 6; Thence Northerly and parallel with the East line of said West 25 acres, 1 56, 50 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence continue along said parallel line 23.50 feet to point "A"; Thence Easterly and parallel with said South line 25.00 feet; Thence Southerly and parallel with said East line 23.50 feet; Page 10 of 11 �r Thence Westerly and parallel with said South line, 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 587.5 square feet, more or less. Said property is hereinafter referred as the "Excepted Area". Subject to a non-exclusive access easement reserved by the County of Riverside for itself, its successors, assigns, tenants, subtenants and licensees to provide reasonable access to the Excepted Area: A 20.00 foot strip of land in the Southwest one -quarter of the Southwest one - quarter of section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, S.B.M., in the County of Riverside, State of California, the centerline of said strip described as follows: Commencing at a point on the south line of Section 6, said point being 140.00 feet westerly from the southeast corner of the west 25 acres of the SW 114 of the SW 1/4 of said section 6; Thence northerly and parallel with the east line of said west 25 acres, 30.00 feet to the point of beginning; Thence continuing along said parallel line 126.50 feet to the terminus of this description. Containing 2,530 square feet, more or less. Said property is hereinafter referred to as the Easement Area. The Easement Area is subject to relocation by the City of La Quinta at the City of La Quinta's discretion. The relocated access shall provide reasonably equivalent access for the County of Riverside, its successors, assigns, tenants, subtenants and licensees to the Excepted Area. APN 770-184-005 78-136 Frances Hack Lane La Quinta, California Page 11 of 11 Tit!t 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 10 ITEM TITLE: A DONATION FROM THE LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE 9/11 MEMORIAL STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution accepting a donation from the La Quinta Historical Society for the 9/11 Memorial. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The La Quinta Historical Society (LQHS) desires to make a donation to the City for the 9/11 Memorial at the Civic Center Campus. FISCAL IMPACT: LQHS is donating $2,500 for electrical upgrades and maintenance of the 9/11 Memorial. The donation will be placed in the Art in Public Places Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On February 21, 2012, City Council approved the design, location, and appropriation from Art in Public Places for a 9/11 Memorial at the Civic Center Campus. The project was completed in January with a dedication ceremony on January 23, 2013. LQHS requests the 9/11 Memorial lighting to be on overnight as with the other art on the Campus to reduce potential vandalism. The lighting for the 9/11 Memorial is tied into the walkway lighting, which is turned off at 10:00 p.m. The cost to rewire the electrical lighting is approximately $1,600. LQHS would like the remaining amount to be used for maintenance of the 9/11 Memorial. ALTERNATIVES: As it is in the best interest of the City to accept the donation, staff does not have an alternative action. Report prepared by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director Report approved for submission by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director RESOLUTION NO. 2013 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM THE LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY WHEREAS, on May 7, 2013, La Quinta Historical Society offered a donation to pay electrical improvements at the Civic Center Campus; WHEREAS, the donation was offered to the City of La Quinta and was not given to or limited to the use of any particular employee or official; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of La Quinta to accept the donation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the donation of $2,500 for electrical improvements and maintenance of the 9/11 Memorial at the Civic Center Campus. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 71h day of May, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California Resolution No. 2013- La Quinta Historical Society Donation Adopted: May 7, 2013 Page 2 ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California T4ht 4 4 a" CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITEXITITLE: DENY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY: PATRICIA VROOMAN; DATE OF LOSS: MARCH 13, 2013 RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 11 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: Deny the claim for damages of Patricia Vrooman in its entirety. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A claim was filed by Patricia Vrooman with a reported date of loss of March 13, 2013. It was forwarded to Carl Warren & Company, the City's claims administrator. Carl Warren reviewed this claim and recommends denial. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the claim is approximately $1,010. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS: The claim is for repairs to the claimant's solar panel, which claimant states was damaged by tree trimming operations being performed on Miles Avenue in the public right-of-way by the City's subcontractor. The claim is being tendered to the City's subcontractor, Teserra, so that they may investigate the claim and contact the claimant with the result of their findings. Report prepared by: Terry Deeringer, Human Resources/General Services Manager Report approved for submission by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Tit!t 4 4 a" CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: 1 ITEXITITLE: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 11.44.060 PARKS AND CONSENT CALENDAR: RECREATION AREAS, PROHIBITING SMOKING IN STUDY SESSION: CITY PARKS PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to take up Ordinance No. amending Section 1 1 .44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to prohibit smoking in City parks, by title and number only and waive further reading; and move to introduce Ordinance No. _ amending Section 11 .44.060 of the La Quinta Municipal Code as set forth in said ordinance, on first reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • Currently, the Municipal Code does not specifically prohibit smoking in City parks. • The proposed Municipal Code language addresses this issue by prohibiting this conduct. FISCAL IMPACT: The Police Department and Code Enforcement staff would cite individuals violating this park rule per the Municipal Code. There would be a cost to purchase and install new signs. The costs of the signs would be approximately $500 and purchased through the park maintenance budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: During the April 16, 2013 City Council Meeting, a group of students from La Quinta Middle School asked the City Council to prohibit smoking in City parks. The students are a part of "Club Live," which promotes positive leadership in the community and at school. The La Quinta Municipal Code has no specific language to prohibit smoking in City parks. The amendment will add the following: LQMC 11.44.060 Prohibited conduct generally. Within the limits of any public park or recreation area of the City, no person shall: V. Smoke within the boundaries of the City parks. Administrative Citations would be issued by the Police Department or Code Compliance. Both make regular visits to parks and smoking infractions would be addressed as with any other administrative concerns. The fine for the first offense is $100, second offense is $200, and third offense is $500. Staff is not including the use of drugs or underage drinking in the Park Rules because the actions are illegal and enforceable. Alcohol is allowed in City parks only during permitted functions where criteria are met through the permit process of a Temporary Use Permit issued by the City. ALTERNATIVES: As a Healthy Eating Active Living City (HEAL), staff does not have an alternative action. Report prepared by: Steve Howlett, Golf & Parks Manager Report approved for submission by: Edie Hylton, Community Services Director ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 11.44.060 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SMOKING IN PARKS WHEREAS, smoking in City parks affects public use of the facility; and WHEREAS, the City is required to protect the public health and public safety in and around public areas; and WHEREAS, the City finds that smoking is a potential risk to public health or public safety in and around the City parks and desires to prohibit smoking in these areas. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AMEND SECTION 11.44.060 Prohibited conduct generally The La Quinta Municipal Code Section 11.44.060, Prohibited conduct generally, is hereby amended to add Subdivision (Y), to read as follows: Y. Smoke within the boundaries of the City parks. SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this day of , 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. which was introduced at a regular meeting on the day of 2013, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the day of 2013, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in City Council Resolution No. 2006-115. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on pursuant to Council Resolution. SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Twy� 4 faQmbrw CITY / SAMA HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: ALTERNATIVES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE COACHELLA CANAL CONSENT CALENDAR WITHIN THE SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE STUDY SESSION: 1 PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive the staff report and provide input regarding the Coachella Canal replacement options. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Due to differential settlement in the Coachella Canal (Canal) that has significantly reduced its capacity to deliver irrigation water, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must replace the existing Canal. Replacing the Canal has a significant impact on the Palmer Course at SilverRock, presenting both challenges and opportunities. CVWD has worked with City staff on two alternatives: 1. Construct a new underground pipe system in the Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 parkways (Underground Pipeline Option) and abandon the existing open channel canal system within the golf course. 2. Construct a new open channel canal parallel and west of the existing Canal within the existing CVWD easement (Parallel Canal Option). FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impacts are not restricted to just the design and construction costs, but also include costs to repair the golf course and lost operations income. These impacts include relocating existing irrigation lines, lost revenue due to loss of play during construction, and reconfiguring the golf course once the construction of either option is completed. City and CVWD staffs, as well as RBF, have reviewed and present the following cost estimates using best engineering judgment based on 75 percent complete plans: Option 1 — Underground Pipeline Option CITY CVWD Construction Cost $8,025,000 $3,926,000 Golf Course Impacts* $ 500,000 NA Lost Revenue $ 263,000 NA Totals $8,788,000 $3,926,000 It should be noted that the above cost does not include abandoning the east/west portion of the existing Canal nor the cost to relocate the L-4 Pump station. The cost to relocate this infrastructure is in excess of $1.0 million which would increase the City's cost to approximately $10.0 million. Option 2 — Parallel Canal Option Construction Cost Golf Course Impacts* Lost Revenue Totals CITY $ 0 $1,707,000 $ 781,000 $2,488,000 CVWD $3,926,000 $ 37,000 NA $3,963,000 *Goff course impacts include a 25% contingency and do not include design, construction management or construction survey costs. Neither option includes right-of-way costs for either the new alignment or the acquisition of the underlying property beneath the existing Canal once the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) easement is relocated. Possible funding sources for this project potentially include bond proceeds, Quimby funds, and General Fund Reserves. The use of the bond proceeds is dependent upon the City receiving a certificate of completion from the California Department of Finance. Should the City Council move forward with the Underground Pipeline Option, CVWD staff indicated they would propose to the CVWD Board of Directors that the City would not need to provide funding until after January 1, 2014, in order to allow the City more time to resolve issues with the Department of Finance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On December 18, 2012, the City Council received a presentation regarding the status of the Canal replacement activities. A copy of that staff report is attached (Attachment 1). At the conclusion of that discussion, the City Council directed staff to request a time extension from CVWD; the Council requested that the City have until at least June 1, 2013 to make its determination regarding the preferred relocation alternative. The rationale for this request is that the City would use 2002 Tax Allocation Bond proceeds (issued by the former Redevelopment Agency for SilverRock infrastructure improvements and on deposit with the Successor Agency) to fund the non -operations costs associated with either option. Canal Alignment Options The Parallel Canal Option would involve constructing a new canal approximately 43 feet west of the existing Canal largely within the existing 140-foot wide easement. Within this easement, approximately 47 feet would be required to accommodate the canal structure, approximately 14 feet of clear space on either side of the canal would be necessary for CVWD's access for maintenance of the canal and an additional 10 foot to 15-foot buffer area would be required on both sides of the canal outside the clear space, which could only be landscaped in native plants (i.e., no turf.) The Canal must be replaced due to subsidence. There is no guarantee that the existing canal section will not subside further in the future requiring yet another realignment to this stretch of the canal. Should the City Council select the Parallel Canal Option, the following is the anticipated schedule of events: June 1. 2013 July 15, 2013 August 1, 2013 August 6, 2013 October 1, 2013 October 31, 2013 September 1, 2013 December 1, 2013 May 1, 2014 September 1, 2014 October 1, 2014 City and CVWD select Parallel Canal Option RBF and sub consultants begin preparation of redesigned golf holes and irrigation system City's irrigation relocation plans are complete. Parallel Canal plans are complete City advertises irrigation system relocation project for bids Irrigation relocation construction starts Irrigation relocation is complete CVWD advertises parallel Canal project CVWD awards parallel Canal project CVWD parallel Canal project begins. City concurrently advertises for bids golf course restoration project CVWD Canal construction is complete and City's Golf Course restoration project begins Golf Course restoration project is complete The Underground Pipeline Option would generally run west of Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 54. The City would grant an approximate 60-foot wide easement to CVWD for this alignment; once buried and operational, no buildings or large landscaping could be installed on this easement. The existing Canal would be crushed and filled, and the easement would be abandoned. The City would then be responsible for either acquiring or accepting title to the property that this easement traverses. Staff has researched underlying fee ownership of the property this easement traverses and found that the property is subdivided into numerous small parcels; many of the parcels are in the name of defunct corporations, defunct water companies or unknown third parties. In reviewing this option with the various development entities that are interested in SilverRock development, they indicated that this option would improve the aesthetic quality of the Palmer Course golf experience and it would improve the golf hole routing and access for the second golf course. They did not, however, indicate that eliminating the above- ground Canal would have a significant impact on the resort and retail development (in terms of improved ambiance or access). Should the City Council select the Underground Pipe Option, the following is the anticipated schedule of events: June 1. 2013 July 1, 2013 August 1, 2013 September 15, 2013 December 1, 2013 January 1, 2014 March 1, 2014 August 1, 2014 July 1, 2014 October 31. 2014 City and CVWD select Underground Pipeline Option and approve construction agreement RBF and sub consultants begin preparation of redesigned golf holes and irrigation system Plans are complete and pipe supply contract is bid CVWD awards pipe supply contract and bids construction contract CVWD awards underground pipe project Construction starts on pipeline City bids grading and restoration work for back nine holes Underground pipe project construction complete Canal abandonment and golf course restoration projects begin Existing Canal abandonment and golf course restoration projects are completed Funding Uses and Sources The Underground Pipe Option would cost the City an estimated $10.0 million and the Parallel Canal Options would cost the City $2.5 million. Not included in this cost is the potential expense to acquire the underlying property if the Canal easement is abandoned as a result of implementing the Underground Pipe Option. Staff does not have an estimate of this cost; further research is required to identify which entities listed as owners still exist. However, staff anticipates the land value would be minimal due to the limited parcel size and the fact that the property is zoned or designated for public facilities. For the Underground Pipe Option, $263,000 is due to lost revenue from interruption in golf operations. The remaining $9.74 million are capital costs associated with the underground pipe. For the Parallel Canal Option, $781,000 is due to lost revenue from interruption in golf operations. The remaining $1,707,000 is capital costs associated with rebuilding the Palmer course and the associated irrigation system. The City has two funding sources for this project: General Fund reserves and $9.2 million of 2002 Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. General Fund reserves can fund both the operation and capital costs. Per the Tax Allocation Bond indenture (the contract the Successor Agency has with the bond holders), these proceeds are designated for SilverRock infrastructure improvements; they cannot be used to underwrite operation costs. The City cannot access the Tax Allocation Bond proceeds until it receives a certificate of completion from the State Department of Finance. This will occur only after the City and the State resolve their differences over the disposition of the $41.4 million of former Redevelopment Agency loan repayment proceeds that reside in the City's General Fund. This could occur by December 2013. Additional Thoughts The Canal, if left in place, has and will continue to pose numerous challenges in the development of SilverRock. While it would cost more to implement the Underground Pipe Option, this expense would be partially offset with reduced future infrastructure costs for utility crossings, golf cart bridges, vehicular bridges and other structures that are only necessary to cross over or beneath the Parallel Canal Option. From an operations standpoint, having the Parallel Canal Option bisect the property creates inefficiencies in the maintenance of the Palmer course as well. Workers must travel additional distances to get to bridges to cross the Canal, the irrigation system has redundancies to be able to operate independently on either side of the Canal, and players take longer to play the course due to the restricted circulation caused by the Canal. Palmer Design representatives are encouraged that the City is considering relocating the Canal as they feel the course can be much more playable and enjoyable without it in the way (Attachment 2). Finally, the aesthetics of the Palmer course as well as the balance of the site would be significantly improved without the Canal to detract from what many describe as one of the most beautiful properties in the Coachella Valley. For these reasons, staff believes the relocation of the Canal into an underground pipe is a worthwhile expense that will ultimately increase the value of the City's investment. Report prepared by: Bryan McKinney, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1 . December 18, 2013 Study Session Report 2. Letter from Palmer Design dated February 2, 2012 ATTACHMENT r.• 1 t ITY SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: December 18, 2012 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: Alternatives for the Replacement of the CONSENT CALENDAR: Coachella Canal Within the SilverRock Golf Course STUDY SESSION: _ PUBLIC HEARING: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive the staff report and. provide input regarding the Coachella Canal replacement options EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Due to differential settlement in the Coachella Canal that has significantly reduced its capacity to deliver irrigation water, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must replace the existing Canal; replacing the Canal has a significant impact on the Palmer Course at SilverRock, both presenting challenges and opportunities. CVWD has worked with City staff on two alternatives: 1. Construct a new underground pipe system in a new alignment (that generally parallels Jefferson Street) and abandon the existing open channel canal system within the golf course south of the L-4 Pump Station 2. Construct a new open channel canal parallel and west of the existing canal within the existing CVWD easement. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impacts are not restricted to just the design and construction costs, but also include costs to repair the golf course. These impacts include relocating existing irrigation lines, lost revenue due to loss of play during construction, and reconfiguring the golf course once the construction of either canal alignment is completed. The following costs are estimated using best engineering judgment; these cost estimates are subject to revision after the 75% plans have been fully reviewed by CVWD and staff: Option 1 — Jefferson Street/Avenue 54 Underground Pipe Construction Cost Golf Course Impacts* Lost Revenue Totals Option 2 — Parallel Canal Construction Cost Golf Course Impacts* Lost Revenue Totals CITY $8,025,000 $ 500,000 $263,000 $8,788,000 CITY $0 $1,707,000 $781,000 $ 2, 488,000 ,MMArx $3,926,000 NA NA $3,926,000 IWIRAP $3,926,000 $37,000 NA $3,963,000 *Golf course impacts include a 25% contingency and do not include design, construction management or construction survey costs. Possible funding sources for this project potentially include bond proceeds, Quimby funds and General Fund Reserve funds. The use of the bond proceeds is dependent upon La Quinta completing certain milestones in the process of winding down the former Redevelopment Agency. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A portion of the Palmer Golf Course at SilverRock was built within the CVWD/Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) easement for the Coachella Canal. The original Letter of Consent for the installation of the Course within the easement was issued by the United States Department of the Interior on June 24, 2004. A condition of the Letter of Consent was that the City release the United States and its agents (i.e., CVWD) from any liability for damage resulting from the construction, operation or maintenance of any of the works of the United States (i.e., the Coachella Canal). This alleviates CVWD from having to pay for any damage to the portion of the golf course within the BOR easement area arising from the construction or maintenance of the existing or future canal systems. In April 2009 CVWD prepared an Evaluation of Subsidence and Canal Replacement Options that confirmed that the Coachella Canal had settled several feet since it was constructed (except in the area it sits on bedrock within the Palmer Course at SilverRock Resort). CVWD and City staff then began working on several options for repairing or replacing the existing canal which is operating at approximately half capacity. In March 2012 the City and CVWD entered into a canal realignment agreement (Attachment 1) whereby CVWD's consultant prepared 75% design plans and cost estimates for two alignment options which were to either construct a pipeline parallel to Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 or to construct a parallel canal to the west of the existing canal. CVWD was also required to hire a third party to prepare an independent cost estimate for constructing the two options. That effort is nearly complete and the City will be asked in January 2013 to select the preferred canal option. Whichever option is chosen, CVWD plans to be under construction by summer 2013, subject to their Board's approval and environmental clearance. The Letter of Consent and Evaluation of Subsidence and Replacement Options report are all available in the Public Works department for review. Option 1 - Underground Pipe along Jefferson Street & Avenue 54 The proposed underground piping option (Jefferson Street Alignment) starts where the existing canal enters SilverRock just west of Jefferson Street. From there the canal would be undergrounded in a 108 inch diameter pipe which will turn south in the Jefferson Street parkway south to Avenue 54 where it will turn west and remain in the Avenue 54 parkway until it is tied back into the canal at the northwest corner of PGA West. (See first aerial exhibit in Attachment No. 1.) This option does not include the relocation of the existing L-4 Pump station or the east west portion of the existing canal, which is estimated to cost in excess of $1 million. The existing canal section south of the pump station would be abandoned, and removed to the extent necessary by CVWD while the City would have to pay for grading and landscaping the old canal alignment. The pipeline construction could start this summer with no interruption to play until the summer of 2014; at that time the back nine holes would have to be taken out of service for the abandonment and refurbishment of the old canal alignment. Should the City Council select the underground pipe alternative, the following is the estimated schedule of events: January 2013 City & CVWD select Underground Pipeline Option February 1, 2013 RBF and sub consultants begin preparation of redesigned golf holes and irrigation system June 1, 2013 CVWD underground pipe project starts construction October 1, 2013 CVWD underground pipe project completes construction March 1, 2014 City bids grading and restoration work for back nine holes July 1, 2014 Canal abandonment and golf course restoration projects begin September 30, 2014 Existing canal abandonment and golf course restoration projects are completed Option 2 — Parallel Canal Option The second option (Parallel Canal Alignment) would reconstruct an open canal, parallel and west of the existing canal within the current BOR easement. This parallel canal would start approximately a quarter mile south of the L-4 Pump Station and reconnect to the existing canal behind the northwest corner of PGA West. (See second aerial exhibit in Attachment No. 1.) This option would be very disruptive of the Palmer Course since the new canal would be constructed through four of the holes on the back side of the course. An irrigation mainline, two canal under crossings, and two bridges, most of which are in the BOR easement, would have to be relocated before the work is underway. CVWD estimates its work will take 45 working days (nine calendar weeks). The City would need to move its facilities and reroute the irrigation lines before CVWD's canal work in order to insure all landscaping and turf is kept alive during the construction period. Additionally, a follow up restoration contract would be necessary to landscape the old canal alignment and incorporate the new canal into the golf course. Staff estimates the overall construction to take five to six months minimum to accomplish. Should the City Council select the parallel canal alternative, the following is the estimated schedule of events: January 2013 February 1, 2013 March 1, 2013 May 1, 2013 June 1, 2012 August 15, 2012 September 1, 2012 October 15, 2012 City & CVWD select Parallel Canal Option RBF and sub consultants begin preparation of redesigned golf holes and irrigation system City advertises irrigation system relocation project for bids Irrigation relocation construction starts Irrigation relocation is complete and CVWD parallel canal project begins. City concurrently advertises for bids golf course restoration project CVWD canal construction is complete City's Golf Course restoration project begins Golf Course restoration project is complete The Coachella Canal, if left in place, has and will continue to pose numerous challenges in the development of SilverRock Resort. While an additional $6.3 million would be necessary to relocate the channel to an underground pipe in the Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 parkways this expense will be at least partially offset with reduced future infrastructure costs for utility crossings, golf cart bridges, vehicular bridges and other structures that are only necessary to cross over or beneath the canal. From an operations standpoint, having a canal bisect the property creates inefficiencies in the maintenance of the Palmer course as well. Workers must travel additional distances to get to bridges to cross the canal, the irrigation system has redundancies to be able to operate independently on either side of the canal and players take longer to play the course due to the restricted circulation caused by the canal. Palmer Design was encouraged that the City was considering relocating the canal last March as they felt the course could be made much more playable and enjoyable without it in the way. (See Attachment No. 2) Finally the aesthetics of the Palmer course as well as the balance of the site would be significantly improved without the canal to detract from what everyone describes as one of the most beautiful properties in the Coachella Valley. For these reasons staff believes the relocation of the canal into an underground pipe a worthwhile expense that will ultimately increase the value of the City's investment. Respectfully submitted, 4mothy R. J as o , P.E. Public Works Dir for/City Engineer Attachments: 1. 2012 City and CVWD Canal Realignment Agreement 2. Letter from Palmer Design dated February 2, 2012 ATTACHMENT 1 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made on this /3741 day of March, 2012 ("Effective Date"), by and between COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a public agency of the State of California ("District") and CITY of LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city ("City'). District and City are sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS A. On or about December 21, 1920 the Congress of the United States of America ("United States') approved the "Boulder Canyon Project Act" (45 Star. 1057). Pursuant to the Boulder Canyon Project Act, the United States constructed the All -American Canal and its Coachella Branch ("Coachella Canal'). The Coachella Canal is generally that portion of the All - American Canal from Drop 1 to Lake Cahuilla. The purpose of the Coachella Canal is to convey water for urban, agricultural, and ground water recharge purposes. B. The United States, by and through the Bureau of Reclamation ("USBR"), holds title to the Coachella Canal and District operates and maintains the Coachella Canal pursuant to Contract No. Ilr-781 with the United States dated October I3, 1934, as amended and supplemented. C. Ground subsidence has occurred throughout the Coachella Valley at least since the original construction of the Coachella Canal. The Coachella Canal has subsided generally uniformly with the land except a portion thereof between Mile Post ("MP")120.3 and the check drop structure at MP 121.8, which portion is more particularly depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein ("Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal"). This Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal is generally located west of Jefferson Street and extends to a point south of Avenue.54 adjacent to PGA West in the City of La Quinta. D. The Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal results in a hydraulic condition whereby the original flow capacity has been substantially reduced. In order to increase the flow capacity within the Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal, the Parties have determined' that a physical solution must occur, including, but not limited to, the possibility of replacing and/or relocating all or a portion of the Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal. E. District retained the services of GEI Consultants, Inc. ('GEI"), to evaluate the subsidence of the Coachella Canal generally, and the non -subsidence within the Non -Subsided Portion of the Coachella Canal and to perform preliminary engineering for four (4) water conveyance system ("Water Conveyance. System') alignment options and six (6) design/construction options for each alignment. On or about April, 2009 GEI submitted to District its report entitled, "Evaluation of Subsidence and Canal Replacement Options" ("Report"). A copy of the Report is on file in each of the City's and the District's offices. F. The implementation of each of the Water Conveyance System alignment options identified in the Report will require the installation of a new concrete -lined canal and/or new 119/015610-0120 -1- 2301648-2-23-12-ReAimCMD&LQ pipelines, and the demolition and removal of certain existing concrete -lined canal, pipelines and facilities. G. The Parties have selected two (2) Water Conveyance System alignment options identified in the Report as the most viable (each, a "Design Alternative") for further design. The options selected for further design and costs analysis are generally described as the "Parallel Canal" and the "Jefferson Street Alignment Those two options are referred to hereinafter as the "Project Alternatives" and are described further in Exhibit "B". The Parties now wish to provide for (i) the District's retention of an engineering firm to complete the design plans and construction cost estimates for the Project Alternatives; (ii) the District's retention of a construction management finny which firm shall be approved by the City's Public Works Director, to prepare a second opinion regarding the construction costs for the Project Alternatives, (iii) preliminary California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and National Environmental Protection Act ("NEPA") compliance studies, and (iv) the Parties' respective payment obligations for the costs set forth in the foregoing clauses (i) through (iii). NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING RECITALS, WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE, AND FOR OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE PARTIES, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS. 1. Preparation of Design Plans and Engineering Cost Estimates. Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, District shall use commercially reasonable efforts to retain an engineering firm ("District's Engineering Consultanf) to complete design plans ("Design Plans') for each of the Project Alternatives to approximately seventy-five percent (75%) completion ("75% Complete") and to prepare construction cost estimates for the anticipated cost of constructing each of the Project Alternatives ("Cost Estimates") based upon the 75% Complete Design Plans, Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date, the District shall retain a construction management firm, which firm shall be subject to the written approval by the City's Public Works Director, to prepare a second, independent opinion regarding the Cost Estimates for each of the Project Alternatives based upon the 75% Complete Design Plans. Once a Project Alternative is selected, the District's Engineering Consultant shall complete the Design Plans for such Project Alternative to one hundred percent ("100% Completion") so that the selected Project Alternative is ready to bid. 2. CEOA & NEPA Compliance. District shall act as lead agency with respect to compliance with CEQA and NEPA and all other applicable state and federal environmental laws and all requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act arising out of or in connection with the Project Alternatives for compliance with all conditions and mitigation measures which must be satisfied in connection with the same (collectively, "Environmental Compliance"). Environmental Compliance shall include compliance with federal and state laws, rules and regulations regarding Native American remains and cultural resources. District shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, all instruments, documents, reports and other like or kind writings required to be prepared and/or filed by CEQA and NEPA. City hereby agrees to cooperate with the District in a timely manner with respect to District's Environmental Compliance. To the extent commercially reasonable, District shall complete its Environmental Compliance concurrently with the preparation of the Design Plans. 1191015610-0120 -2- 2101648-2-23-12-Redline CV WD & LQ 3. Meet and Confer. The Costs Estimates from both the engineering firm and construction management firm shall be provided promptly to the City upon completion. After both Costs Estimates are completed and provided to the City, the Parties shall meet and confer for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days, during which the Parties shall determine if they jointly wish to pursue the construction of the Jefferson Street Alignment Alternative. The Parties understand that the District will not likely pursue that Project Alternative unless the Parties are able to reach a mutually agreeable cost sharing contract. This Agreement is not intended to require the Parties to enter into any further agreements relating to this matter. Instead, the purpose of this Agreement is to provide cost information necessary for the Parties to determine the feasibility of the Jefferson Street Alignment Alternative. A contract will not exist, and there shall be no obligation on the part of either Party to enter such a contract, with respect to the construction of any Project Alternative unless and until the Parties have executed an agreement approved by their respective legislative bodies regarding the construction of the Project Alternative and containing all essential terms, including the cost allocation for construction costs. In the event the Parties agree to the Project Alternative, in writing, District is authorized to cause the District's Engineering Consultant to complete the Design Plans for such Project Alternative to one hundred percent ("1001/o Completion") so that the selected Project Alternative is ready to bid. 4. Cost Allocation. a. The costs and expenses to undertake any and all pre -construction work whether or not set forth in this Agreement (collectively, the "Pre -Construction Work") shall be home fifty percent (50%) by District and fifty percent (50%) by City. As used in this subsection, the term "costs and expenses" shall only include the costs and expenses to perform the Pre - Construction Work, as follows: i. Costs incurred by District for the preliminary engineering as described in Recital E; ii. The costs to conduct preliminary Environmental Compliance studies for the Project Alternatives; iii. The costs fcr the preparation of the 75% Design Plans for the Project Alternatives and associated Cost Estimates; and iv. The costs for the preparation of the Design Plans to 100% Completion for the preferred alternative. b. The costs and expenses for items 4.ai-iv are projected not to exceed $400,000 ("Current Estimate"). Therefore, the maximum costs and expenses projected to be home by the District and the City are $200,000, respectively. If it appears that the Current Estimate for items 4.ai-iv will be exceeded, or costs not covered by items 4.a.i-iv are identified, the District and City will meet and confer and discuss how the additional costs will be shared. However, the City shall not have any obligation to make any payment beyond the $200,000 unless an amendment to this Agreement is approved by the City Council, which amendment expressly increases the amount to be paid by the City under this Agreement to more than $200,000. u91015610.0120 -3-. 230164&2-23-12-Redline CVWD&LQ Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, each Party shall be responsible for its own staff and overhead costs and expenses, and such costs and expenses shall not be deemed Pre - Construction Work. C. District may obtain a disbursement from the City pursuant to the following process: From time to time, but not more than once per month, District shall provide to City a written disbursement request in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit "C" setting forth City's proportionate share of certain Pre -Construction Work. Said request shall show all Pre - Construction Work that District has funded with such disbursement, itemized in such detail as the City may reasonably require, accompanied in each case by invoices reasonably satisfactory to the City. Within twenty-one (21) days after the City's receipt of a disbursement request, the City shall disburse the City's proportionate share to the District. d. The District agrees to maintain all records relating to the Pre -Construction Work for no less than three (3) years following the completion of the work covered by this Agreement. The District agrees to make such records available for review and audit of the City or its designee, upon thirty (30) business days' written request by the City in accordance with the notice provisions of this Agreement. 5. Notices. All notices, invoices and payments (collectively, "Notices") provided for hereunder shall be in writing and (i) mailed (registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested), (ii) delivered by reputable overnight or same day courier service that provides a receipt with the date and time of delivery, or (iii) hand delivered to the Parties at the addresses set forth below or at such other addresses as shall be designated by such Party and by a written Notice to the other Party in accordance with the provisions of this section. All such Notices shall, if hand delivered, or delivered by overnight or same day courier service, be deemed received upon delivery and, if mailed, be deemed received two (2) business days after such mailing. To City: Notices Delivered by U.S. Mail: City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92247 Attn: City Manager Notices Delivered Personally or by Courier: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: City Manager copy to: Rutan & Tucker, LLP 611 Anton, Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: M. Katherine Jenson, Esq. 1191015610.0120 2301668-2-23-12-Redline CVWD&LQ -4- To District: Coachella Valley Water District 85-995 Avenue 52 Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 Attn: Steve Robbins, General Manager -Chief Engineer copy to: Redwine and Sherrill 1950 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Gerald D. Shoaf, Esq. 6. Entire Agreement. This instrument, together with the exhibits attached hereto and other writings referenced herein, contains the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior agreements between the Parties, oral or written, and any and all amendments thereto. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this instrument shall be of no force and effect, excepting a subsequent modification in writing, signed by the Parties to be charged. 7. Attorney,. In the event of any litigation or other action between the Parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing Party shall be entitled, in addition to such other relief as may be granted, to its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 8. Goveming Law. This Agreement is entered into within the State of California, and all questions concerning the validity, interpretation and performance of any of its terns or provisions or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties hereto shall be governed by and resolved in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principals. 9. Interpretation. The provisions of the Agreement shall be construed as to their fair meaning, and not for or against any Party based upon any attribution to such Parry as the source of language in question. 10. Time is of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and every term and provisions thereof. 11. Assignment. Neither District nor City shall, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign or transfer this Agreement or any obligation, right, title or interest assumed by such Party, except as otherwise provided herein, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Any attempted assignment in violation if this provision is void ab inirio. Subject to the foregoing, the provisions of this Agreement shall apply and bind the successors and assigns of the Parties. 12. . No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except as specifically set forth herein, this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon any individual or entity which is not a party hereto (except the USBR) and the Parties expressly disclaim such third party benefit. 1191015610-0120 2301649.2-23-12-Rain CV WD R LQ -5- 13. Waivers. No delay on the part of any Party hereto in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any waiver on the part of any Party hereto of any right, power or privilege hereunder operate as a waiver of any other right, power or privilege hereunder, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege hereunder, preclude any other or further exercise of any other right, power or privilege hereunder. 14. Authority to Execute. Each individual executing this Agreement hereby represents and warrants that he or she has the full power and authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the named Parties. 15. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one instrument. 16. Default Interest. Any payment not paid when due shall bear simple interest equal to two percent (2%) of the delinquent payment for each month or portion thereof that such payment remains delinquent. 17. Jurisdiction. The Parties agree that any action or proceeding to enforce or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the Federal or State courts located in Riverside County, California, and the Parties hereto consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction over them by any such courts for purposes of any such action or proceeding. 18.. Days. Unless otherwise specified, all references hereunder to "days" shall mean calendar days. [End - signatures on next page] 1191015610-0120 2301648-2-23-12-Redline CV WD & LQ -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year hereinabove written. Date: Me ac-k 13 , 2012 ATTEST: Jul' Fernandez B d Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: REDWINE & SHERRILL By: A=`^ d General Counsel Date: -3-/ S 2012 ATTEST: > 4Ac Susan Maysels Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: RUTAN UCI LP By: i Ca he tie Jens City Attorney 1IM15610-0120 2301648-2-23-12-Rc&iwCV WD & LQ -7- "District" "City" CITY OF LA QU I NTA, a California municipal corporat on and charter city By: `L ,,,L;s Interim City Manager COACHELLA CANAL LEGEND SILVEROCK RESORT SITE PIPELINE ALIGNMENT COACHELLA CANAL SILVEROCK RESORT SITE LEGEND ® PARALLEL CANAL REPLACEMENT SECTION EXHIBIT "B" DESCRIPTION OF THE TWO DESIGN ALTERNATIVES Description of the proposed future construction project The proposed future construction project is intended to correct major flow deficiencies associated with the existing Coachella Canal starting at Mile Post 120.3 and extending south through the PGA West Residential development. The loss of capacity within the existing open canal is the result of differential settlement between the section of the canal on the desert floor and the section of the canal that comes into close proximity with the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Avenue 53 and west of Jefferson Street (the "Non -Subsided Portion"). Due to the grade differences between its subsided portion and Non -Subsided Portion the canal has last over 50014 of the original capacity that it was designed to convey. As a result of work by the District and Agency Staff, two design alternates will be evaluated as a part of this Agreement to correct the flow capacity issues and are described as follows. The proposed underground piping option (Jefferson Street Alignment) generally follows Jefferson Street along the western parkway, starting at the intersection with the Coachella Canal and proceeding south to the intersection of Avenue 54. North of Avenue 54, the proposed circular pipe, with the final diameter to be determined through the preliminary design effort described within the agreement, will bend to the west along the north side of Avenue 54. Fast of the existing canal, the proposed pipeline will curve southward and connect to the existing canal at a newly constructed drop structure located at Mile Post 121.8. This option will require the relocation of the existing L-4 Pump station, which is currently located 0.5 mile west of Jefferson Street, to a location closer to Jefferson Sliver, which will also be the location of an inlet structure for the open canal to closed conduit system conversion. In addition to the above mentioned construction, this option will require the relocation and reconnection of four active irrigation laterals and reconstruction of the drop structure at the lower end to facilitate the lowering of the conveyance system with a new lower outlet elevation. The existing canal section would be abandoned, and removed to the extent necessary, and the surrounding area would be re-established to conform to the existing condition. The second option (Parallel Canal) would reconstruct an open canal, parallel and west of the existing canal within the current canal easement right of way. This parallel canal would start approximately a quarter mile south of the L- 4 Pump Station and reconnect to the existing canal section at the drop structure at Miles Post 121.8. The canal alternative will be designed to accommodate future subsidence by lowering the downstream tie-in at the drop structure to an elevation lower than required to convey existing design flows. This new canal section would require reconnection of one irrigation lateral to the proposed canal section, reconstruction of the drop structure to facilitate the lowering of the outlet elevation, removal and backfill of the concrete canal section and re-establishment of the surrounding area to the existing condition. 10-0120 230164 .2-23-12 EXHIBIT `B" 2301648-2-23-12-Redline CVWD&I.Q 1191015610-0120 2301648.2-23-12-Reaim CVW &LQ EXHIBIT "C" .FORM OF WRITTEN DISBURSEMENT REQUEST ]to be inserted] EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN COMPANY Arnold D Palmer, President February 27, 2012 Dear Timothy R Jonasson and the City of La Quinta, California, It has been brought to the attention of the Arnold Palmer Design Company that studies to shift and/or expand the water canal in its existing alignment or relocate the canal to run North and South along Jefferson Street are under consideration. After a brief study of preliminary studies, materials and concepts our initial thoughts are below. Currently, the existing canal engages the golf course on several holes (10, 11, 12, and 15) by either running parallel or perpendicular to the hole and line of play. While originally designed in this configuration, the intrusion of the engineered canal feature is not ideal and ultimately impacts the natural and artistic aesthetic of the golf course while compromising circulation, functionality and the strategic merits of the golf holes. For example, the narrow approach to the 15'h green is a direct result of the existing canal alignment. Attempts to widen or shift the canal alignment will significantly impact this golf hole and others from a safety, aesthetic, playability and strategic standpoint. While this approach is possible, APDC does not consider this an ideal option. The relocation/realignment of the canal to remove it entirely from the golf course, and potentially align it to run North/South along Jefferson St., is in the best interest of the golf course. This will allow the Silver Rock Golf Course to be free from this constraint and allow ownership and management to rectify some aesthetic, strategic, circulation and functional issues that will, in turn, greatly improve the overall golf course experience. The Arnold Palmer Design Company is interested in continuing to work with the City of La Quinta and the Silver Rock Golf Course to keep the integrity of our Golf Course intact and if possible, improve upon and strengthens our design should canal work impact the golf course. Sincerely, s,�aut�n ft�ucJ Brandon A. Johnson Senior Golf Course Architect Arnold Palmer Design Company Phone (407) 876-1068 • Fax (407) 876-6283 9000 Bay Hill Blvd. • Suite 300 • Orlando, Florida 32819 P.O. Box 52 • Youngstown, Pennsylvania 15696 information(a)arnoldoalmerdesion.com • www.arrioldpalmerdesign.com ATTACHMENT 2 DESIGN COMPANY Arnold D Palmer, President February 27, 2012 Dear Timothy R Jonasson and the City of La Quinta, California, It has been brought to the attention of the Arnold Palmer Design Company that studies to shift and/or expand the water canal in its existing alignment or relocate the canal to run North and South along Jefferson Street are under consideration. After a brief study of preliminary studies, materials and concepts our initial thoughts are below. Currently, the existing canal engages the golf course on several holes (10, 11, 12, and 15) by either running parallel or perpendicular to the hole and line of play. While originally designed in this configuration, the intrusion of the engineered canal feature is not ideal and ultimately impacts the natural and artistic aesthetic of the golf course while compromising circulation, functionality and the strategic merits of the golf holes. For example, the narrow approach to the 15t" green is a direct result of the existing canal alignment. Attempts to widen or shift the canal alignment will significantly impact this golf hole and others from a safety, aesthetic, playability and strategic standpoint. While this approach is possible, APDC does not consider this an ideal option. The relocation/realignment of the canal to remove it entirely from the golf course, and potentially align it to run North/South along Jefferson St., is in the best interest of the golf course. This will allow the Silver Rock Golf Course to be free from this constraint and allow ownership and management to rectify some aesthetic, strategic, circulation and functional issues that will, in turn, greatly improve the overall golf course experience. The Arnold Palmer Design Company is interested in continuing to work with the City of La Quinta and the Silver Rock Golf Course to keep the integrity of our Golf Course intact and if possible, improve upon and strengthens our design should canal work impact the golf course. Sincerely, Brandon A. Johnson Senior Golf Course Architect Arnold Palmer Design Company Phone (407) 876-1068 • Fax (407) 876-6283 9000 Bay Hill Blvd. • Suite 300 • Orlando, Florida 32819 P.O. Box 52 • Youngstown, Pennsylvania 15696 inform ation(aD-arnoldpal merdesign.com • www.arnoldpalmerdesign.com 5/7/2013 City Council Meeting May78, 2013 Coachella Canal Replacement Alternatives Background ➢Existing canal experienced subsidence, which reduced the canal capacity by 50% ➢April 2009 Canal Subsidence Evaluation Report ➢ March 2012 Canal Alignment Agreement ➢ 75% design of two agreed upon alternatives complete 5/7/2013 Underground Pipeline Construction •a F[} W y'{} 6 9E ..r v —fin _ III I Alternative No. 1— Underground Pipe ➢Constructed parallel to Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 within SilverRock Resort Parkway ➢Total Cost = $13,926,000 ➢CVWD Cost = $3,926,000 ➢City Cost = $10,000,000 ➢Golf Course Impacts/Lost Revenue = $763,000 ➢Summer 2014 Construction Parallel Canal Construction C 2 5/7/2013 Alternative No. 2 — Parallel Canal ➢ Constructed west of the existing canal within the existing CVWD easement ➢ Total Cost = $6,451,000 ➢ CVWD Cost = $3,963,000 ➢ Cost to City = $2,488,000 ➢ Golf Course Impacts/Lost Revenue = $2,488,000 ➢ Spring 2014 Construction Alternatives ➢Option No. 2 —Parallel Canal • Less Expensive than Option No. 1 • Improves Playability of Some Holes • Does Not Impact Jefferson Street and Avenue 54 Parkways • Reduced Right -of -Way Cost for City Alternatives ➢ Option No. 1— Underground Pipeline • Reduces BOR/CVWD requirements for future development of SilverRock Resort • Relatively minor damage and loss of play to Palmer Course • Greater time to redesign affected holes • Reduces future infrastructure costs • Reduces maintenance costs • Improves golfer's experience • Improves aesthetics Next Steps ➢By June In • Select preferred canal realignment alternative • Direct CVWDto complete design ➢ By July 2nd — Pipeline Option • Construction agreement with CVWD • CVWD preorders pipe ➢ By August 6rh — Parallel Canal Option • Complete design and bid irrigation relocation project 3 5/7/2013 Summary ➢Annually, Council must take certain actions to levy annual assessments for Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 ➢Assessments fund right-of-way landscape, lighting, median, and parkway maintenance ➢Assessment rate will remain at $35.60 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit; same since 1997 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Fiscal Impacts ➢ Lighting and Landscape District will generate $960,698 ➢ WIII fund 77%of Fy 2013/2014 estimated $2,381,508 cost to maintain landscaping of medians and parkways as well as retention basins ➢ Use $100,000 from County Service Area 152, levied by County for retention basin maintenance ➢ Combined Income is projected to be $1,060,698 ➢ Shortfall of $320,810 covered by General Fund 4 5/7/2013 Intent of Public Hearing ➢Property owners input ➢Testimony regarding any proposed changes Alternatives ➢Adjust Engineer's Report to reflect changes resulting from this Public Hearing Recommended Action ➢Adopt a Resolution confirming the diagram and assessment for Landscape and lighting Assessment District 89-1, Fiscal Year 2013/2014, pursuant to Final Engineer's Report 5 5/7/2013 Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Through 2016/2017 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Completed Projects Washington Street Dual Left Turn Lanes at Avenue 48 > Stabilization of City Owned Properties > Senior Center HVAC Upgrade Project Background > 2012/2013 CIP = $3,460,159 in projects > 2 traffic signal projects returned to Add Project > All other projects completed, in design, under construction, or contracts awarded by end of fiscal year • 3 completed projects • 15 projects in design or construction • 4 projects on hold On -Going Projects ➢ Adams Street Bridge ➢ Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the All American Canal — Indio Lead ➢ Madison (Avenue 50 to Avenue 52) — Indio Lead ➢ Coral Mountain Apartments ➢ Fred Waring Drive Median Island Improvements 0 5/7/2013 Projects In Progress ➢Coachella Canal at SilverRock — CVWD Lead ➢ Eisenhower Drive at Sinaloa Round -A -Bout ➢Highway 111 at Washington Street Intersection Improvements —with CVAG ➢Dune Palms Road Bridge Improvements ➢Adams Street Signal and Street Improvements Projects Returned to Add List ➢Traffic Signals Jefferson at Ave 53 and Avenue 50 at Orchard ➢Miles Avenue and Washington Street Intersection Improvements ➢Avenue 50 and Washington Street Intersection Improvements Projects On Hold or Carried Over ➢Dune Palms Road Street Improvements Projects In Progress (Cont'd) ➢Sports Complex Lighting Rehabilitation and Expansion ➢La Quinta Park ADA Improvements ➢Civic Center Park ADA Improvements ➢Library ADA Improvement Project ➢Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements ➢Westward Ho/Dune Palms Road Affordable Housing Improvements Five Year Draft CIP Overview ➢Draft CIP for Fiscal Years 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 identifies a total of $26,126,483 in capital improvement projects ➢Additional projects listed within next five years total $193,988,708 7 5/7/2013 Five Year Draft CIP ➢FY 2013/14 (Capital Budget) = $19,462,787 • 13 projects proposed, including 10 new projects and 3 recurring projects ➢FY 2014/15 Projects = $1,654,887 ➢FY 2015/16 Projects = $1,661,809 ➢FY 2016117 Projects = $1,442,000 ➢FY 2017118 Projects = $1,905,000 Additional Projects ➢ Estimated Cost = $193,988,708 • Bridge Improvements • Street Improvements • Regional Interchange Improvements • Traffic Signal Improvements • Sound Attenuation Walls • Public Facilities • Park Improvements • Other Miscellaneous Improvements Recommended Action ➢Approve Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 Capital Improvement Program H 5/7/2013 BACKGROUND RadioActive Building y= — Approved in 2003 1:4j r '•—16,OOOsquare feet 43parking spaces Closed in 2011, vacant since then Zone Change 2012-142 and Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 to Rezone and Convert an Existing 15,933 Square -Foot Building Into an Indoor Miniature Golf Recreational Facility PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE • Current zoning - Commercial Park • Proposed zoning - Regional Commercial • A General Plan Amendment is not needed — 2035 La Quinta General Plan — Commercial Park to General Commercial — Consistent with the Regional Commercial zoning designation G 5/7/2013 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Roden roll-themed I8-hole black -light miniature golf course, arcade, snack bar, and parry rooms Open Tuesday through Sunday, and dosed on Monday except for holidays Hours of operation range from 10:00 a.m. to midnight Code requires 63 parking spate _. OTINU I 1 9 \ • Adopt Zone Change 2012-142, subject to Findings; and, • Adopt Conditional Use Permit 2012-146, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT o Hours of operation complement surrounding uses Most Intensive use during periods when other uses are dosed 0 43 existing parking spaces on Mini Golf parcel - Applicant exploring adding eight spaces on Mini Golf parcel Surplus of spaces in to Quinta Valley Plaza lot '= Applicant is working to secure a shared parking agreement for balance of spaces a i- �/� 1 •T Y l� 10 5/7/2013 Third Time Extension for Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 and Site Development Permit 2006-875 for a Retail and Medical Office Development Located at the Northeast Corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive LOCATION BACKGROUND Approved on March 17, 2009 • Extensions granted in 2011 and 2012 Approval included: • Site development • Conditional use permit for: • Grocery store • Drugstore • Convalescent/rehabilitation facility • Tentative parcel map creating ten parcels (five commercialffive medical) DEVELOPMENT • 25+ acre site • 104,000 sf retail center on the west" half • 130,450 at medical office complex on the easterly half 4 E77i,,�•qT-T.Jio �j r ••'S�: P , O�O �Itoelol OF 0 I. 4C+$a?f� L7�,i"�yi•�i4J,i`adY bad;ta*� �_ 11 5/7/2013 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • Minimal Revisions • Incorporate Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee • Applicant accepts the revised conditions RECOMMENDATION • Approve a third time extension to Conditional Use Permit 2007-105, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval; and, Approve a third time extension to Site Development Permit 2006-875, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval. ALTERNATIVES • Deny the two-year time extension • Approve a one-year time extension 12 K;vJ ' ('X;Page I ofI #Vf Ir Subj: Supreme Court Upholds City of Riverside's Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Date: 5/6/2013 1:09:19 P.M. Pack Daylight Time From: mckenzie(acacities.ora To: mckenzie(a)cacities.org CC:: CarriqqDocacities.orci, bismarckO)cacities.ora, espieae1(o cacities.ora, pwhitnell(a)cacities ora LILEAGUE C OFCALIFORNIA ITIES"' TO: Board of Directors FROM: Chris McKenzie, Executive Director RE: Great News in Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Case I wanted to be sure this story we just published in our newsletter. It is very clear from the opinion that the Court relied on the League amicus brief. Supreme Court Upholds City of Riverside's Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance League's Friend -of -the -Court Brief Influences Court's View of Local Land Use Control This morning the California Supreme Court, in a long-awaited opinion rejected a challenge to the city of Riverside's ordinance banning medical marijuana dispensaries. The Court held that neither the state's Compassionate Use Act nor the Medical Marijuana Program limit a city or county from regulating the use of land, and cities and counties retained the authority to provide that medical marijuana dispensaries are not permitted to operate within their borders The Court found support in the League's friend -of -the -court brief to conclude that neither the voters nor the Legislature in adopting the medical marijuana statues intended to impose a "one size fits all" policy on cities and counties with respect to local land use. The League congratulates the city of Riverside for its victory, which represents an important reaffirmation of local land use control. The League thanks Thomas B. Brown and Stephen A. McEwan with Burke Williams & Sorensen for drafting the League's friend -of -the -court brief. Monday, May 06, 2013 AOL: Terry I Henderson The Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities Proposes a Solution foc Govemme... Page 4 of 7 Sign up for our Email Newsletter 0 GO Privacy by 23'SafeSubscribe5m The Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities Proposes a Solution for Governments Struggling With Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction From the Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities Looking for that magic source of funding to maintain your local transportation system? Look no further! The Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities - which includes 16 local/regional governments and transattransportation agencies, as well as over support groups statewide — has laid out a vision for how revenues generated from California's AB 32 cap and trade program could re -shape California's urban and rural landscape through integrated land use and transportation investments that build on regional SB 375 and greenhouse gas emission (GHG) reducing plans with competitive grants for local entities. This opportunity to fund needed transportation system improvements would invest billions of dollars in road and bridge maintenance, transit operations, and bicyclelpedestrian Infrastructure, while leveraging local land use and policy changes needed to complement those investments. This approach of combined land use strategies oo-implemented withlivable community infrastructure in the hearts of communities will yield significant long-term greenhouse gas emission reductions as well as numerous community benefits, such as improved public health, open space and habitat preservation, safe routes to school, and needed support for disadvantaged communities. California faces a sig�hortage in funds to maintain our existing transportation system, and lacks adequate funding to build an active transportation network. The Transportation Coalition has developed a program proposal for a Sustainable Communities Infrastructure Pro ramthat would provide funding for livable community investments to meet the c a enges o increasing eve opment in existing urban and developed areas to meet the requirements of SB 375. This proposal would fund GHG-reducing investments at the local level that implement regional Sustainable Communities Strategies within existing urbanized or developed areas — while also helping local governments meet critical sustainable transportation infrastructure and maintenance needs. Further, it incentivizes integrated strategies that combine land use changes with infrastructure investments at the neighborhood scale to \ achieve greatest long tern GHG benefits. The Transportation Coalition submitted a concept proposal to the California Air Resources Board for inclusion in their and Trade Investment Plan, and the proposal is reflected in legislation as Assembly Bill 574 (Lowenthal►. a emants Pa proposal include: 1. Regional allocation of funds to ensure that every region of the state receives a fair share. 2. Favoring integration of land use strategies and transportation investments to achieve the highest GHG emission reductions. Studies consistently show that combining transportation investments with complementary land use changes significantly increase the GHG emission reduction and co -benefits. 3. Using a competitive process at the regional level, under criteria developed by the state, to prioritize local project proposals that co -implement transportation investments with land use changes that most cost effectively meet the goals of the program and further stimulate innovation and flexibility at the local and regional level. 4. Improved modeling and verification systems for GHG evaluation to ensure effective results. Mayor Krovoza summed up the proposal thusly: "The cities and counties of each region know which projects -- informed by their unique land use and travel patterns - - will be most effective for carbon reduction' The Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities' approach will advance the most effective projects that further integrated regional solutions and respect local needs." http://www.californiacitynews.orgl2O l 3/05/transportation-coalition-livable-communities-pr... 5/7/2013 The Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities Proposes a Solution for Governme... Page 5 of 7 ELIGILBE USES OF FUNDS The Transportation Coalition proposes allocating funds equitably to regional governments under statewide criteria to administer competitive grants to local entities - proposing combinations of investments, including transit service and operating costs, road and bridge maintenance, retrofits for complete streets and urban greening, safe routes to school, and clean technology and other community infrastructure — all integrated with land use modifications tosupport regional plans. WHY PROPOSAL IS UNIQUE The Transportation Coalition's proposal would stimulate local innovation and flebbility to get the greatest GHG reductions and best overall benefits for communities — while cost effectively meeting the goals of AB 32 and supporting other community benefits. The Coalition's proposal is consistent with AB 32, SB 375, and the provisions of AB 1532 and SB 535 — and most equitably and effectively meets the transportation and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals of the state and local communities. Cap and trade revenue is public money resulting from the administration of AB 32, the Global Warning Solutions Act. It must be spent to implement that law. We believe the Transportation Coalition's proposal provides the most public and local community benefits while achieving the most cost effective implementation of AB 32. For the first year Budget allocation the Coalition proposes the state provide funding through the regions for planning and project development focused on this competitive and integrated approach to most effectively reduce greenhouse gases, meet our local and regional transportation needs, and revitalize our communities. Over the life of the program, we believe that allowance revenues related to motor vehicle fuels should be dedicated to reducing emissions from the transportation sector, with a major part of those funds allocated to this sustainable community funding program. The Coalition has commissioned research to identify how to get the best results from such a program and has brought together the local governments and regional agencies responsible for administering our sustainable community programs to create a program concept that will most equitably and effectively achieve the state's short term and long term GHG reduction and sustainable community goals. WANT TO HELP? Over 50 organizations from across the state — ranging from transportation and rail agencies to business and environmental groups — have signed on as supporters of the Transportation Coalition for Livable Communities proposal concept. More details can be found on the Coalition's website, www.transfunding.org — here's how you can get involved! Assembly Bill 574 — Sustainable Communities Infrastructure Program • Hearing on Monday April 22nd at 1:30pm —join us! • Write a Letter of Support — download a template here and email to info@transfunding.oro • Read AB 574 (Lowenthal) and check out the Fact Sheet CARB Draft Cap and Trade Investment Plan • Hearing on Thursday April 25th at 9am —join us! • Join our "Supporters Network" by emailing info(COransfundinp.org • Learn more about our proposal and checkout the Draft Investment Plan ��i•7_1SIIL• ,� _ �. _ _ Califomia Transit Association • California Alliance for Jogs • Natural Resources Defense Council • California State Association of Counties • League of California Cities • Self -Help Counties Coalition • California Association of Councils of Governments • Sacramento Area Council of Governments • Southem Califomia Association of Governments • Metropolitan Transportation Commission • San Diego Association of Governments • Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District • San Joaquin Valley Regional Policy Council • Transportation California • Environmental Defense Fund • California Center for Sustainable Energy COALITION SUPPORTERS County of San Bernardino Western Riverside Council of governments County of Monterey http://www.califomiacitynews.orgl2013/05/transportation-coalition-livable-communities-pr... 5/7/2013 Labor, Charter Cities Clash Over Prevailing Wage I California City News Page 4 of 7 Sign up for our Email Newsletter I GO Privacy by IFSafeSubscribesM Labor, Charter Cities Clash Over Prevailing Wage By John Howard Special from Capitol Weekly Millions of public dollars and thousands of jobs are on the line, but the impact of the prevailing wage on municipal projects is more than the price tag. It's also about the constitution — and fairness. At issue is a requirement that cities and local governments pay the prevailing wage when they build public works projects. The prevailing wage, set by the state's Department of Industrial Relations, is the level of pay for similar work in the locality where the public works project is being built. California has some 121 charter cities, or about a fourth California's incorporated cities, and it's a group that includes the top 15 heavy hitters — such as Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Fresno and Riverside. A charter city, created with the approval of voters, creates its own charter and defines its own system of governance. A general law city is organized according to state law. For years, efforts have been by anti -union groups to persuade the charter cities to exempt themselves from the prevailing wage requirement for public works projects, an option typically not open to general law cities. The prevailing wage, particularly in large cities, often reflects the level of pay of unionized workers in the area with contracts that have been negotiated through collective bargaining. The powerful, non -union Associated Builders and Contractors, a nationwide group with chapters across the country, has long opposed prevailing wage requirements in California and elsewhere, citing high costs and the usurpation of local authority to decide their own costs. "One of the most conspicuous ways for dry governments to reduce spending and increase revenue is to exempt contractors from paying costly state -mandated prevailing wage rates," according to one ABC study. Not surprisingly, labor doesn't see it that way, opposing any drive to pay less for projects built by non -union workers They "urge cities to exempt themselves from prevailing wage and encourage general law cities to become charter cities for the same purpose; according to the California Building and Construction Trade Council, which has some 160 affiliates with 390,000 members. "Middle class jobs with decent wages are the key to California's economic recovery." In the Capitol, major legislation authored by Senate Leader Darrell Steinberg, a Sacramento Democrat, and Sen. Anthony Cannella, a Ceres Republican, would choke off state dollars to charter cities if they don't pay the prevailing wage for public works projects. The bill, SIB 7, is at or near the top of the cities' attack list. http://www.califomiacitynews.orgl2O l 3lO5llabor-charter-cities-clash-over-prevailing-wage.... 5/7/2013 Labor, Charter Cities Clash Over Prevailing Wage I California City News Page 5 of 7 The sties see the prevailing wage issue not only in dollars but in authority. Since a charter city's governance is locally approved and created by law, how can the state override how that lawful entity decides to spend its dollars? "This is a fundamental issue for us," said Dan Carrigg of the League of California Cities. "This is a leverage play to try and compel cities to do something they are not required to do under the constitution. It is a charter city's policy decision whether to pay prevailing wage on projects where it only spends its own money." Too, the cities see the legislation as the progenitor of a larger move to contravene charter cities' authority. "They will use this same leverage play, and withhold every dime of money until you comply with whatever the issue of the day is," Carrigg added. Others agree. In a letter opposing SB 7, the non -union builders and contractors said the bill "extends to a wide variety of local issues including whether (or not) to reform, amend or repeal the prevailing wages" and "seeks to punish a charter city for exercising constitutionally provided rights." For some cities, the legislation stirs little controversy. The impact of SB 7 "would be little to none; said Tim McDermott, the finance director of Santee near San Diego. "Our charter requires that the prevailing wage will be paid, similar to general law cities. It would take a four -fifths vote of the council to modify that. Basically, that trigger has never been pulled and I don't see it having a major impact going forward." During the past two years, Santee has spent about $15 million on public works projects, McDermott added. Wages are a piece of the dispute, but so is transparency. "We don't what charters to exempt themselves from a public contract code that says you have to go to competitive bidding to ensure that the public knows what the real costs are," said Carolyn Hilliard of CIFAC, a Martinez -based, nonprofit group that includes unions, builders and trade groups. The state Supreme Court last year ruled in favor of the city of Vista in northem San Diego County, which built a series of voter - approved public works projects but did not pay the prevailing wage, a move that the city later said saved some $2 million in lower wages. The voters earlier approved the projects, including a civic center complex and fin; stations, in 2006, and the city adopted its charter the following year. Organized labor had fought Vista and had filed a lawsuit, but the Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that Vista was properly exercising its authority as a charter city. "Autonomy with regard to the expenditure of public funds lies at the heart of what it means to be an independent govemment entity," the courrs majority opinion said. In dissent, Justices Kathryn Werdegar and Goodwin Liu said the decision allowed "charter cities to opt out of the constraints of state law." The thrust of SB 7 responds to the court decision. "The Supreme Court said to labor that the decision to require a prevailing wage on local projects is up to the city and not to the state," Carrigg noted. Capitol Weekly has been a must -read in Sacramento since 1988 and its editor, John Howard, has long been a trustworthy figure in the Capitol community. Visit capitolweekly. net for more stories from the Capitol, and follow Capitol Weekly on Twitter (@Capitol_Weekly) for more updates. http://www.californjacitynews.orgt2O l 3/05llabor-charter-cities-clash-over-prevailing-wage.... 5n12013 Informational Item: 20 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13, 2013 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at 4:08 p.m. by Chairman Blum. PRESENT: Board Members Mortenson Blum, Spirtos Park and Donais ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Finance Director, Robbeyn Bird and Senior Secretary, Vianka Orrantia PUBLIC COMMENT — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the Minutes of January 9, 2013 Motion — A motion was made by Board Members Spirtos/Park to approve the Minutes of January 9, 2013. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1 Transmittal of Treasury Report for December 2012 and January 2013 Ms. Bird presented and reviewed the staff reports for the month of December 2012 and January 2013. Motion — A motion was made by Board Members Parks/Donais to review, receive and file the Treasurer's Reports for December 2012 and January 2013. Motion passed unanimously. INVESTMENT ADVISORY MINUTES 1 March 13, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION 1. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Investment Policy and Work Plan Items Ms. Bird presented the draft 2013/2014 Investment Policy and a draft 2013/2014 Statement of Investment Policy according to the Association of Public Treasurers of the United States & Canada (APT) Investment Policy Certification as well as a copy of APT's Investment Policy Certification and the approved 2012/2013 work plan item staff report from the previous year for the Board's review and consideration for the upcoming fiscal year. Ms. Bird advised that the advantage to certifying the City's Investment Policy is additional review certifying the policy is in compliance according to the states government codes. In response to Board Member Mortenson, Ms. Bird advised that the only change to the policy staff is recommending at this time is an increase in LAIF to $50 million and the elimination of the 30% investment limit requirement. Motion — It was moved by Board Members Mortenson/Donais to continue the review of the 2013/2014 Investment Policy. Motion carried unanimously. Board Member Spirtos asked the Board to consider incorporating "serving as City liaisons" as part of the 2013/2014 Work Plan. Motion — It was moved by Board Members Spirtos/Mortenson to continue the review of the 2013/2014 Work Plan Items. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL 1. Month End Cash Reports for January 2013 and February 2013 and the Pooled Money Investment Board Reports for December 2012 and January 2013 Ms. Bird presented the staff reports for January 2013 and February 2013 and the Pool Money Investment Board Reports for December2012 and January 2013. Noted and Filed. . BOARD MEMBER ITEMS In response to Board Member Mortenson, Ms. Bird updated the Board on the Oversight Board's decision to approve the transfer of certain governmental use properties as well the status of the Department of Finance and the State Controller's activities. INVESTMENT ADVISORY MINUTES 2 March 13, 2013 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved by Board members Mortenson/Park to adjourn this meeting at 4:52 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. ;Vianka spec d(ly sub ' ed, Or ntia, Senior Secretary City of La Quinta, California INVESTMENT ADVISORY MINUTES 3 March 13, 2013 Department Report: 2A OFTI TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Maysels, City Clerk DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF PERRIS TO ADDRESS COUNCIL REGARDING SUPPORT FOR $92 MILLION IN STATE FUNDS FOR THE LAKE PERRIS DAM REMEDIATION PROJECT The City of Perris is seeking support from area cities for state funding of the Lake Perris Dam Remediation project. This project was submitted by the State Department of Water Resources (DWR) as part of the Governor's 2013/14 Budget. A presentation by the City of Perris' Public Information Officer is tentatively scheduled for the May 21, 2013 La Quinta Council Meeting. The Perris City Council has requested that La Quinta adopt the attached resolution by May 30, 2013. The Lake Perris reservoir stores water for delivery to the Coachella Valley Water District, the Desert Water Agency and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The lake is also a state park with roughly 600,000 visitors each year (another state report cites 1.1 million as the average annual attendance at the lake). The project is required due to seismic safety risks discovered in 2005, which prompted the lowering of the water level. The DWR indicates that the lake cannot remain at this lower level indefinitely because it is needed as an emergency supply storage facility for the State Water Project and serves as an important recreation area. The project consists of strengthening the dam foundation and reinforcing it with a stability berm, which would allow the lake to return to its previous maximum operating elevation. Construction is expected to begin in 2014 with completion at the end of 2015. DWR's estimated total project cost in the draft budget is $287 million, with the cost to be split between the state (approximately one-third) and the three water agencies that contract with the DWR to receive water from the State Water Project. State budget documents show that the state would fund its $92 million portion with $38 million from Proposition 84 bond funds, but the funding source for the remaining $54 million has not yet been identified. The Coachella Valley Water District supports this project and, along with the other water districts, is obligated to contribute its portion of the funding. [Note: The total project cost from a 2006 study was $488 million, and recent negotiations between the DWR and the water districts have the total cost down in the $140 million range.] The Legislature Analyst's Office has recommended that the Legislature deny the request to begin funding this project in the upcoming budget year because the Legislature needs information about the state's cost for the project, likely funding sources, and a full vetting of the alternatives, which include: 1) reducing the lake's capacity; 2) making the lake a recreation -only facility; and 3) decommissioning the dam. RESOLUTION NUMBER XOM A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF[INSERT YOUR CITY NAME HERE], COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE GOVERNOR'S COMMITMENT TOLAKE PERRIS AND THE LAKE PERRIS STATE RECREATIONAREA, AND URGING OTHER CITIES INSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TO DO THE SAME WHEREAS, the Lake Perris State Recreation Area attracts more than 1.1 million visitors each year, generating tens of millions of dollars of economic activity for Riverside County, the Inland Empire and all of Southern California; and WHEREAS, the Lake Perris State Recreation Area offers visitors a convenient, low-cost destination to engage in a wide assortment of recreation activities, including, fishing, swimming, scuba diving, hiking, bicycling, horseback riding and rock -climbing; and WHEREAS, the Lake Perris State Recreation Area is home to a panoply of plant life, such as brittlebrush, desert encelia, sagebrush, black and white sages, buckwheat, cactus, chamise, penstemon, interior live oak, sugar bush, California poppies, phacelia and common fiddleneck; and WHEREAS, the Lake Perris State Recreation Area offers sanctuary for more than 100 species of birds, including bald eagles, Golden Eagles, hawks, falcons, roadrunners, loggerhead shrikes, larks, California thrashers, California quail, hummingbirds and ospreys; and WHEREAS, California Gov. Jerry Brown has pledged $92 million in funds to assist in the needed repairs of the Lake Perris State Recreation Area Dam, thereby restoring the water level of Lake Perris to its historic level and ensuring its legacy as a recreation gem and flora and wildlife refuge NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of [INSERT YOUR CITY NAME HERE] supports the Governor's commitment to Lake Perris and the Lake.Perris State Recreation Area and urges other cities, communities and agencies throughout Southern California to do the same. ADOPTED, SIGNED, and APPROVED this [INSERT DAY OF MONTH] day of [INSERT MONTH], 2013. Mayor, [INSERT MAYOR'S NAME] ATTEST: City Clerk, [INSERT CITY CLERK NAME] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) § CITY OF [CITY] ) I,[INSERT CITY CLERK NAME] , CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF [CITY NAME], CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution [INSERT NUMBER] was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of [CITY NAME] at a regular meeting thereof held the [INSERT DATE OF MEETING], and that it was so adopted by the following called vote: AYES: [INSERT VOTE] NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk; [INSERT CITY CLERK NAME] Department Report: 3A D OFTI TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND PARKS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT UPDATE Staff continues to work with the residents of north La Quinta subdivisions regarding the need for improved landscape maintenance and/or landscape and irrigation capital improvements. Willdan Financial recommends that the outreach be continued until more feedback is received in order to determine residents' willingness to help support additional maintenance and/or improvements that directly benefit their property before a citywide initiative is undertaken. By getting this feedback first, Willdan believes it may become more apparent as to whether or not a citywide special tax or parks assessment district would be preferred by residents to pay for right-of-way and parks landscape maintenance. Staff will keep the City Council informed on the outcome of the north La Quinta subdivision landscape and lighting workshops, the first of which is schedule with Rancho Ocotillo residents on May 6, 2013. Department Report: D313 OFTI TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Timothy R. Jonasson, Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON FORMER LAING LUXURY HOMES PM10 FENCE Per direction given at the April 16, 2013 City Council meeting, staff estimated the cost of replacing the chain link and green windscreen fence that fronts the former Laing Luxury Homes site on Washington Street with the recycled bollard and cable system used on City lots in The Village, at approximately $25,000. To install this system, the City would likely need permission from the property owner in order to have access behind the sidewalk, which meanders in and out of the City's right-of- way. Since staff has been contacted by the new developer, West Coast Housing Partners, regarding refreshing all plans and submitting the Final Map for a residential project by the end of this year, staff does not recommend moving forward with a fence replacement project at this time. Staff will keep the City Council informed as to when a formal application is made to the City by the new developer as well as any opportunity to incorporate the bollard and cable system into a condition of a future permit. Meanwhile, staff will ensure the existing PM10 fence is maintained properly by the property owner. Department Report: 4A OFTI TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Johnson, Community Development Director DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: Goldenvoice Concerts Update The 2013 Coachella Music and Arts Festival and Stagecoach Music Festival recently concluded. Staff assisted residents with concerns and complaints, observed operations and monitored the festivals all three weekends. A summary of staff's observations is as follows: Traffic and Circulation: As a result of several traffic and circulation changes implemented in 2012 combined with road infrastructure improvements made to Madison Street and Monroe Street, minimal traffic impacts occurred outside of the core area surrounding the festivals. The shuttle service was increased again this year with approximately 30,000 patrons using shuttles during each of the two Coachella weekends (up from 25,000 in 2012). Approximately 7,500 patrons used shuttles during Stagecoach (up from 5,000 in 2012). The drop-off/pick up area and taxi staging area was again located at Avenue 52 and Madison Street. This segment of the operation, which also sees a heavy flow of pedestrian and bicycle traffic heading to and from neighboring La Quinta residences, flowed well again this year. Overall, traffic flow on streets surrounding the venue significantly improved over the past three years with many of the surrounding streets seeing minimal, if any, traffic delays. Hours of Operation: The agreement between Goldenvoice and the City of Indio identified specific ending times for Coachella and Stagecoach, including a noise curfew for the camping area. With exception to an isolated music issue in the camping area the Thursday/early Friday morning prior to Stagecoach, the camping noise curfew time was adhered to and concert ending times were complied with. It should be noted that for Stagecoach, the venue ended much earlier than the ending time identified in the agreement, ending at approximately 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday, and just after 10:00 p.m. on Sunday. Noise: Goldenvoice retained a consultant again this year to monitor the noise level. Noise monitoring devices were established near the four perimeter intersections. Monitoring information from each of the stations was available real time via a webpage. In summary, the monitoring identified that maximum noise level was not exceeded during the three weekends. In addition to monitoring provided by Goldenvoice, staff also conducted spot noise level checks at several locations and times throughout each of the three weekends. Venues were loud at times, particularly during the two Coachella weekends, which resulted in a limited number of complaints that were namely voiced during the late evening/early morning hours. Security: Goldenvoice once again provided financial assistance for additional private security to be established at multiple La Quinta communities in close proximity to the venue. There was a visible presence of private security officers at several of the surrounding gated communities (Rancho Santana, Carmela, La Cantera, Polo Estates, and Mountain View). In addition to the private security, Goldenvoice also provided financial assistance for the addition of La Quinta Police officers during the evening hours. These officers were dedicated to patrolling the La Quinta area neighboring the venue and responding to matters associated with the concerts. Dust: Concerns were again raised with regard to dust impacting neighboring residents, particularly those located in Rancho Santana. Goldenvoice conducted an aggressive watering effort. A significant effort was made to water key roads, driveways and intersections just prior to the "blowout" period at the end of the day. Special Events: In addition to the Goldenvoice concerts, three separate events were held in La Quinta. During the first week of Coachella, the Hugo Boss party was at Lake La Quinta Inn and the H&M Party was at the Mery Griffin Estate. The third event was during the second weekend of Coachella, the Soho House event, which was also held at the Mery Griffin Estate. All three events were approved by the City, with each adhering to the prescribed conditions of approval. No complaints or concerns were brought forth. Summary: Improvements continue to be made that are reducing impacts upon La Quinta residents. The number of complaints received this year is down from previous years. Staff will continue to work closely with Goldenvoice and Indio representatives to further address impacts associated with the concerts. c�M OF TK4'9w AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 201 3 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING CONSENT CALENDAR: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 , FISCAL YEAR 201 3/201 4 STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1 RECOMMENED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council confirming the diagram and assessment for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 , Fiscal Year 201 3/201 4, pursuant to the Engineer's Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • Annually, the City Council must take certain actions in order to levy the annual assessments for Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 ("District"). • Assessments are collected to fund 77% of right-of-way landscape, lighting, median, and parkway maintenance. The assessment rate will remain at $35.60 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), which has been the rate since 1997. FISCAL IMPACTS: The assessment levy ($35.60 per EDU) will generate $960,698. This will fund 77 % of the Fiscal Year 201 3/201 4 estimated $1 ,381 ,508 cost to maintain retention basins and right-of-ways (landscaping and lighting maintenance for medians and parkways). The City will also receive $1 00,000 from County Service Area (CSA) 152, levied by the County of Riverside, to fund retention basin maintenance. The County levies these assessments on City parcels to fund storm water facility maintenance as well as other programs to improve storm water quality within the City. The combined income is projected to be $1,060,698; the $320,810 shortfall will be funded by the General Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On April 2, 2013, the City Council adopted the following resolutions: • Resolution No. 2013-015, approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 in connection with Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1. • Resolution No. 2013-014, declaring intention to levy annual assessments for construction, maintenance, and servicing landscape and lighting improvements within the boundaries of the territory included in the Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, and giving notice thereof. The Engineer's Report must include the following information: 1 . A description of the services to be provided throughout the District; 2. Total costs necessary to provide all services described in the Engineer's Report; 3. A diagram showing the boundaries of the District, including special benefit zones; and 4. An assessment schedule. The final Engineer's Report, for the Fiscal Year 2013/14 assessments, has been completed (Attachment 1) and establishes the maintenance budget and number of benefitting parcels. It projects the following for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 in comparison to the Fiscal Year 201 2/2013 Engineer's Report: Citywide Benefit Zone Number of Local Benefit Zones Number of EDU's EDU Rate District Revenue FY 2012/2013 Yes 6 27,008 $35.60/EDU $961,361 FY 2013/2014 Yes 6 26,986 $35.60/EDU $960,698 In accordance with City Council direction, all property owners, including those within six previously identified local benefit zones, will be assessed at a flat rate. The purpose of this public hearing is to allow affected property owners an opportunity to ask questions of the City Council and staff regarding the District and to provide public testimony regarding any proposed changes. No changes are proposed at this time. Only after the public hearing has been conducted can the City Council adopt assessment fees for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. Should the City Council receive testimony from the public through the end of the public meeting/hearing that warrants a change to the assessment level, the City Council can lower the assessment by a majority vote of the Council, or increase it but only by vote through a property owner ballot. If lowered, the reduction in assessment level would impact the revenues necessary to fund the Landscape and Lighting operational budget for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. If service levels were not adjusted accordingly, the General Fund would be required to make up the difference between the reduced revenue level and the proposed Landscape and Lighting operational budget. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council can direct staff to adjust the Engineer's Report to reflect any changes resulting from the public hearing. Should the City Council direct amendments to the Engineer's Report, an amended Engineer's Report and the impacts of the amendments will be submitted to the City Council for approval at the May 21, 2013 City Council meeting. Upon approval, the City Council will adopt a resolution confirming the assessment diagram and assessments for Fiscal Year 2013/2014, pursuant to the modified Engineer's Report. Report prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1 . Final Engineer's Estimate RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 (PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Council directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an annual report for Fiscal Year 2013-2014. SECTION 2. The City Engineer filed an annual report on April 2, 2013, and the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments within Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 and set a Public Meeting/Hearing date of May 7, 2013 at the La Quinta City Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. Notice of the Public Meeting/Hearing was given in the time and manner required by law. SECTION 3. On May 7, 2013, a Public Meeting/Hearing for which notice was given, was conducted at which every interested person was given an opportunity to object to the proposed assessment in writing or orally, and the City Council has considered each protest. SECTION 5. On May 7, 2013, the City Council found that written protests against the proposed assessment had not been made by owners representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be assessed. SECTION 6. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the annual report of the Engineer of Work and hereby levies the assessment set forth for Fiscal Year 2013-2014. Resolution No. 2013- Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1 Adopted: May 7, 2013 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 71h day of May 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY 442ron] WilLlI:1 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 2013/2014 ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT Intent Meeting: April 2, 2013 Public Hearing: May 7, 2013 *IWI LLDAN Hnancial Services ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT CITY OF LA QUINTA Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 Riverside County, State of California This Report and the enclosed diagrams show the exterior boundaries of the District as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 1 l; t4 day of r , 2013. Willdan Financial Services Assessment Engineer On Behalf of the City of La Quinta By: Stacee Reynolds Senior Project Manager, District Administration Services By: Richard Kopecky R. C. E. # 16742 Q`D L. k10 F� �2 C 16742 EXP - O 4-5 C/VI �F CA1.�F� ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LA QUINTA STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 89-1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached was filed with me on the day of 2013. BY: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, on the day of 12013. BY: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, on the day of 12013. BY: Susan Maysels, City Clerk City of La Quinta Riverside County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS /. OVERVIEW 5 A. INTRODUCTION 5 B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATION 5 A DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 6 A. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIC AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT 6 B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT 6 C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT 7 ////. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 8 A. GENERAL 8 B. BENEFITANALYSIS 9 C. METHODOLOGY 10 /Y DISTRICT BUDGETS 13 A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS B. 2013/2014 DISTRICT BUDGET C. AREAS OF ADDITIONAL SPECIAL BENEFIT 13 14 17 APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18 APPENDIX B - 2013/2014 COLLECTION ROLL 19 WWILLDAN Financial services L OVERVIEW A. INTRODUCTION The City of La Quinta (the "City") annually levies and collects special assessments in order to provide and maintain the facilities, improvements and services within Street Lighting and Landscape District No. 89-1 (the 'District'). The District was formed in 1989 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and authorizes the Agency to annually levy and collect assessments to maintain the services and improvements related thereto. This Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report') describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. The proposed assessments are based on the estimated cost to maintain improvements that provide special benefit to properties assessed within the District. The various improvements within the District and the costs of those improvements are identified and budgeted separately, including expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor Parcel Number ("APN") by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor Parcel Numbers and specific fund numbers on the tax roll to identify properties assessed for special district benefit assessments. Each parcel within the District is assessed proportionately for those improvements provided by the District and from which the parcel receives special benefit. Following consideration of public comments, written protests at a noticed public hearing and review of the Report, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the assessments, the Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 pursuant to the 1972 Act. In such case, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller, and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATION The assessments for the District provide a special benefit to the parcels assessed, and the City utilizes General Fund Revenues to fund improvements and services that are considered general benefit. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 5 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services This District was formed pursuant to the 1972 Act, which permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing for the maintenance of certain public improvements, which include the facilities existing within the District, as those improvements provide a special benefit to parcels. The City Council reviews the current and projected years' costs for the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of the District facilities and sets the assessment for the ensuing fiscal year, which runs between July 1 and June 30. A DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT A. DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AND SPECIFIC AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the boundaries of the City. The Diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries has been submitted to the City Clerk at the City and is included by reference. B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT As applicable or may be applicable to this District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following: • The installation or planting of landscaping. • The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 6 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to: • The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment, • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices, • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments, • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services, • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements, • Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment. The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: • Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT The District improvements are the operation, servicing and maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including, but not limited to, personnel, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services described as follows: 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 7 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services • Landscaping and Appurtenant Facilities include, but are not limited to, landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance and appurtenant facilities, located within the public street rights -of -way, medians, trails, and dedicated street, drainage or sidewalk easements within the boundary of the District. • Lighting and Appurtenant Facilities include, but are not limited to, poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices, controllers and appurtenant facilities as required to provide safety lighting and traffic signals within public street rights -of -way and easements within the boundaries of the District. Maintenance is defined as the furnishing of services and materials for the operation and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of landscaping, public lighting facilities, or appurtenant facilities, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury, and the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. • Servicing is defined as the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. The plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by reference made a part of this report. ///. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT A. GENERAL The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value: 'The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 8 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The formula used for calculating assessments in this District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to apportion the costs based on benefit to each parcel. Properties within the District boundary are found to derive a special benefit from the improvements provided by the District. These properties include single family residential, non-residential, vacant residential and non-residential, golf courses, agricultural and hillside conservation properties, vacant and remote non- residential and rural and estate residential properties. Special Benefits The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed parcel receives special benefit from the improvements maintained and funded by the assessments, specifically, landscaping and lighting improvements installed in connection with the development of these parcels. The desirability of properties within the District is enhanced by the presence of well - maintained landscaping and lighting improvements in close proximity to those properties. The annual assessments outlined in this Report are based on the estimated costs to provide necessary services, operation, administration, and maintenance required to ensure the satisfactory condition and quality of each improvement. The special benefits associated with the landscaping improvements are specifically: • Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the District providing a positive representation of the area. • Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping. • Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, and dust and debris control. • Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well -maintained improvements associated with the properties. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 9 of 19 IWILLDAN Financial Services • Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well -maintained surroundings and amenities. • Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuating noise. The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods, specifically: • Enhanced deterrence of crime — an aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways. • Improved visibility of pedestrians and motorists. • Improved ingress and egress to and from property. • Reduced vandalism, damage to improvements or property, and other criminal acts. • Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss. • Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties. The preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District. C. METHODOLOGY Pursuant to the 1972 Act, the costs of the District may be apportioned by any formula or method that distributes the net amount to be assessed among the assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements. The special benefit formula used within the District should reflect the composition of the parcels - and the improvements and services provided therein - to apportion the costs based on estimated special benefit to each parcel. The cost to provide maintenance and service of the improvements within the District shall be equitably distributed among each assessable parcel based on the estimated special benefit received by each parcel. Equivalent Benefit Units To equitably spread special benefit to each parcel, it is necessary to establish a relationship between the various types of properties within the District and the improvements that benefit those properties. Each parcel within the District is 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 10 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services assigned an Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") factor that reflects its land use, size and development, or development potential. Parcels that receive special benefit from the various District improvements are proportionately assessed for the cost of those improvements based on their calculated EBU. The EBU method assessment for this District uses the Single Family Residential parcel as the basic unit of assessment. A Single Family Residential ("SFR") parcel equals one EBU. Every other land -use is assigned an EBU factor based on an assessment formula that equates the property's specific land -use and relative special benefits compared to the Single Family Residential parcel. The EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefits to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of land use type, size, and development. The following table provides a listing of land use types, the EBU factors applied to that land use and the multiplying factor used to calculate each parcel's individual EBU for each improvement provided in the District. During the formation of the District, a methodology was developed to calculate the EBUs for other residential and non-residential land use parcels, which are outlined below for reference. Every land use is assigned EBUs based on the assessment formula approved for the District. Parcels which have been determined to receive greater benefit than the SFR parcel are assigned more than 1 EBU and parcels that are determined to receive lesser benefit than SFR parcels are assigned less than 1 EBU as reflected in the Assessment Methodology. Land Use Exempt Parcels 0.0 EBU Factor Single Family Residential Parcels 1.0 per unit Non -Residential Parcels 5.0 per acre; 1.0 minimum Vacant Residential Parcels 0.33 per unit Vacant Non -Residential Parcels 1.65 per acre for first 20 acres only Golf Course Parcels 0.50 per acre; 1.0 minimum Agricultural Parcels 0.25 per acre; 1.0 minimum Hillside Conservative Zone Parcels 0.10 per acre Vacant & Remote Parcels 0.825 per acre for first 20 acres only Rural/Estate Residential 1.0 + 0.33 per acre in excess 1 acre Single -Family Residential The City's General Plan allows up to one acre of area for subdivided residential lots. The subdivided single family lot equal to or less than one acre in size is the 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 11 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial Services basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. Parcels less than one acre in size zoned for single-family residential use are assessed one (1) EBU. Non -Residential The factor used for converting nonresidential is based on the average number of typical single-family residential lots of five per acre. Therefore, non-residential parcels will be assessed five (5) EBUs per acre with a minimum number per parcel of one (1) EBU. Vacant Residential Parcels defined as single family residential parcels less than one acre and having no structure will be assessed 33 percent (33%) of a single-family dwelling, or 0.33 EBU per parcel. Vacant Non -Residential Parcels not considered single family residential parcels less than one acre, and having no structure will be assessed based on acreage. The typical development in La Quint@ occurs in increments of twenty (20) acres or less. The first twenty (20) acres of a Vacant Non -Residential parcel will be assessed at a rate of 33 percent (33%) of developed nonresidential properties, or 1.65 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number of EBUs per parcel is one (1) EBU. Any parcel of land greater than twenty (20) acres is considered open space and exempt from assessment until such time as parcel subdivision or development occurs. Golf Courses Properties identified as golf courses will be assessed a rate of 10 percent (10%) of the developed nonresidential properties, or 0.50 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number per parcel is one (1) EBU. Agricultural Properties identified as agricultural will be assessed a rate of 5 percent (5%) of developed nonresidential properties, or 0.25 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. The minimum number per parcel is one (1) EBU. Hillside Conservation Parcels located in areas zoned Hillside Conservation per the City's Official Zoning Map will be assessed on the basis of allowable development within the Hillside Conservation Zone. The parcel will be assessed as one dwelling unit per ten (10) acres or 0.10 EBU per acre or any portion of an acre. Vacant and Remote Non -Residential Parcels (Annexation No. 9) Parcels not considered single family residential parcels less than one (1) acre and do not contain structures, will be assessed based on acreage. The City defines Vacant and Remote Non -Residential as parcels physically separated from City services and not readily able to develop due to difficult access and 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 12 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services utility limitations. The land values are typically one half the value of other Vacant Non -Residential parcels because of the high cost of constructing appropriate access and utility infrastructures necessary. The Vacant and Remote Non - Residential parcels are assessed a rate of 0.825 EBUs per acre or portion thereof, for the first twenty (20) acres, with a minimum of one (1) EBU per parcel. Rural/Estate Residential Parcels of one acre or more in size, but having only one residential unit are identified as Rural/Estate Residential. These parcels will be assessed a rate of one (1) EBU for the first acre and 0.33 EBUs for each additional acre or portion of an acre. Exempt Property Publicly owned property and utility rights -of -way are exempt from assessment, as well as parcels of land shown on the County Assessor's records as Vacant Desert Land, Vacant Mountain Land, Agricultural Preserve and Public Utility owned land. This Report does not propose an increase in the District assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 over or above the maximum rate established. The proposed rate per EBU for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 is the same rate assessed for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. The base assessment rate to be approved for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 is $35.60. The maximum assessment rate per EBU may not increase without a vote of the property owners in the District. Therefore, the assessment is proposed to remain at the maximum amount of $35.60 per EBU. This equates to total projected assessment revenue of $960,697. The City proposes the remaining $420,810 be funded through a General Fund contribution of $320,810 and $100,000 of revenue from CSA 152. N. DISTRICT BUDGETS A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be established and maintained for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. The following describes the services and costs that are funded through the District, shown in the District Budgets. District Costs Personnel — Reflects relevant City Staff salaries, wages and benefits, and also includes Worker's Comp insurance, Stand -By, and Overtime labor. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 13 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial services Contract Services — Includes contracted labor, such as the Riverside County Tax Roll Administration Fees, maintenance and repair of traffic signals, tree trimming, and security service. Rental Services — Reflects funds used for the purpose of uniform rental. Vehicle Operations — Includes the maintenance of fleet vehicles. Utilities — Includes the electric, telephone, and water services. Travel Training & Meetings — Reflects the funds used for the purposes of training and meetings. Information Technology — Includes computers, printers, and other related items and services. Operating Supplies — This item includes plant replacement, safety gear, field materials, and the materials used for the purposes of removing graffiti. Small Tools/Equipment— Includes non -capital small tools and equipment. District Administration — The cost for providing the coordination of District services and operations, response to public concerns and education, as well as procedures associated with the levy and collection of assessments. This item also includes the costs of contracting with professionals to provide any additional administrative, legal or engineering services specific to the District including any required notices, mailings or property owner protest ballot proceedings. B. 201312014 DISTRICT BUDGET For the purpose of estimating costs for the maintenance and servicing, actual costs are used where possible. However, where the improvements are new, or where actual maintenance experience is lacking, cost estimates will be used to determine costs. The Budget of estimated cost of operation, servicing, and maintenance for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 is summarized on the next page in Table 1. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 14 of 19 WILLDAN Financial Services Table 1 Fiscal Year 201312014 Budget Personnel Salanes-Perm anent Full Time;:--77 $59,292 $59,292 Employee Benefits 27,326 27,326 Stand By 1,700 1,700 Stand By Overtime 2,200 2,200 Overtime Total Personnel $90 518 $90 518 Contract Annual Lighting & Landscape Report $15,000 $15,000 Services Civic Center Campus Lake Maintenance Landscape Lighting Maintenance 120,500 120,500 Financial Services Admin. Fee 15,000 15,000 Citywide Maintenance Contract 594,000 594,000 Maintenance & Repair Maintenance & Repair Tree Trimming 15,000 15,000 Janitorial Services Security Service- Corporation Yard 1,350 1,350 Total Contract Services $760 850 $760 850 Rental Services Uniforms $1,320 $1,320 Total Rental Services $1,320 $1,320 Vehicle Facilities Charges Operations Fleet Maintenance 6,809 6,809 Facility & Equipment Depreciation Total Vehicle Operations $6,809 $6,809 Utilities Electric $149,000 $149,000 Phone 400 400 Water 200,000 200,000 Total Utilities $349400 $349400 Travel Training & $530 $530 Meetings Total Travel Training & Meeting s $530 $530 Information Computers Printers and Services $6,009 $6,009 Technology Total Information Technology $6,009 $6,009 Operating Plant Replacement $50,000 $50,000 Supplies Graffiti Removal 10,000 10,000 Safety Gear 400 400 Field Materials 35,000 35,000 Total Operating Supplies $95400 $95400 Small Tools / Non -Capital $250 $250 Equipment Total Small Tools/Equipment $250 $250 Total Landscape & Lighting Budget $1,311,086 $1,311,086 District Public Works Administration $32,093 $32,093 Administration Cit ide Administration 38,329 38,329 Total Di strict Administration $70422 $70422 Total Landsca e & Liahlina Ex enditures $1,381,508 $1,381,508 CSA 152 Revenue $100,000 General Fund Contribution 320,810 Balance to Le $960 698 Total EBU 26,986 Levy Per EBU $35.60 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 15 of 19 WWILLDAN Financial Services The following information was obtained from the Riverside County Assessor's Secured Roll, Assessor's Parcel Maps, and the City's Planning Department. The land use categories were developed to classify the different land use types in the City. Table 2 Agricultural • 22 394.81 93.31 $3,499.80 $3,321.80 98.31 Exempt 2,251 9,464.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Course 289 3,540.72 1,827.36 65,052.28 1,828.36 65,087.88 Hillside Conservation 12 319.03 31.90 1,135.62 31.90 1,135.62 Multi -Family Residential 37 92.81 643.00 22,819.60 635.50 22,623.80 Non -Residential 265 549.78 2,805.40 99,181.60 2,754.95 98,076.22 Rural/Estate 52 108.08 87.67 3,121.50 8Z67 3,120.50 Single Family Residential 19,875 2,431.55 19,841.00 706,304.002 19,874.00 707,514.40 Vacant/ Remote 18 338.97 180.96 6,441.90 180.96 6,441.90 Vacant Non -Residential 258 678.10 681.95 24,275.50 689.35 24,539.12 Vacant Residential 2,449 1,164.70 815.76 29,021.28 805.53 28,657.34 Total 25,528 •r•3.19 27,008.31 $960,675.08$960,696.58 (1)The EBU count in this column reflects the total EBU count for the distnctwhereas, for budget purposes, the EBU count in the previous table reflects only those parcels that are assessable (not exempt). (2) The difference in the "Balance to Levy" figure in the previous table and the land use classification proposed levy in this table is due to the Riverside County even penny requirement for each charged parcel. At the time of the Report there was an decrease in EBU assessed of 21.78 over the prior year estimates. Actual changes will be based on the final County Secured Roll for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. The difference is due to changes in County Land Use Classifications. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 16 of 19 W"WILLDAN Financial services C. AREAS OF ADDITIONAL SPECIAL BENEFIT In FY 2011/12, in conjunction with the review of the District budget, Willdan analyzed several North La Quinta subdivisions that receive special benefits from the District by having their perimeter and entrance landscaping maintained by the District. These maintenance costs include turf, shrub, irrigation, as well as water, electric and plant replacement costs. In order for the City to recover these funds through assessments placed on properties, certain proceedings need to take place. This involves the City Council initiating proceedings through resolution to form a landscaping district under the 1972 Act, and ultimately sending out ballots to the affected property owners in conformance with Proposition 218. Willdan is working with the City to assist in the formation of a new overlapping landscaping district which would be in addition to the current assessment. A separate Engineer's Report detailing the analysis of special and general benefit will be required describing the improvements and properties involved. After approval of the Engineer's Report, the City Council will need to adopt a resolution stating its intention to form the landscaping district and set the time and place for a public hearing. The district will require that the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment outweigh those submitted in opposition to it, with ballots weighed according to the assessment amount 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 17 of 19 WILLDAN Financial services APPENDIX A - DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM The Boundary Diagrams for the original districts have previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the 1972 Act and are made part of this Report by reference. The parcel identification, lines and dimensions of each parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the Assessor Maps of Riverside County for the year in which this Report was prepared and is incorporated by reference and made part of this Report. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 18 of 19 WILLDAN Financial services APPENDIX B - 2013/2014 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Riverside County Assessor Parcel Maps and/or the Riverside County Secured Tax Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared. Non -assessable lots or parcels may include government owned land, public utility owned property, land principally encumbered with public right-of-ways or easements and dedicated common areas. These parcels will not be assessed. A listing of parcels within the District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this Report. Upon approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller, and included on the property tax roll in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. If the parcels or APNs within the District and referenced in this Report, are re -numbered, re -apportioned or changed by the County Assessor's Office after approval of the Report, the new parcel or APNs with the appropriate assessment amount will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. If the parcel change made by the County includes a parcel split, parcel merger or tax status change, the assessment amount submitted on the new parcels or APNs will be based on the method of apportionment and levy amount approved in this Report by the City Council. 20132014 LLD 89-1 Page 19 of 19 Twy� 4 faQmbrw CITY / SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THROUGH 2017/2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 Capital Improvement Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides a five-year program for identifying, scoping, budgeting and scheduling capital projects. • The first year is titled the "Capital Budget" and is based on existing fund balances and projected revenues. Upon adoption, the Capital Budget is then incorporated into the City's operating budget, and funds are appropriated for specific capital facilities, equipment and improvements. • Projects slated for subsequent years are approved on a planning basis only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are incorporated into the Capital Budget. • Those projects designated as "additional projects" do not have identified funding sources through the term of the five-year program or, in the case of Development Impact Fee funded projects, a long-term collection period is required to accumulate funds before the specified project is implemented. • A total of 13 projects are identified for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 costing $19,837,787. FISCAL IMPACT: The Capital Budget will result in an additional $19,837,787 of capital project expenditures, and will be included in the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 operating budget. If the City Council approves the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 operating budget this action will authorize the expenditure of $19,837,787. CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None of the proposed projects identified for funding during Fiscal Year 2013/2014 are proposed to be funded with state or federal funding. Should state or federal funding become available, these projects will be subject to state and/or federal prevailing wage requirements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On March 19, 2013, staff presented the draft CIP to the City Council for review and discussion. Changes to the draft CIP include moving the roundabout projects at Jefferson Street/Avenue 52 and Westward Ho/Roadrunner to the add list and moving the Jefferson Street/I-10 Interchange payments to Fiscal Years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018. The final CIP is provided as Attachment 1 . Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council must hold a public hearing on the CIP and consider its adoption by resolution at the public hearing. Upon its adoption, the 2013/2014 CIP will be incorporated into the City's Fiscal Year 2013/2014 budget. ALTERNATIVES: The City Council may direct staff to modify the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 CIP. If this occurs, the CIP would be scheduled for final approval at a future City Council meeting. Report prepared by: Bryan McKinney, Principal Engineer Report approved for submission by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 CIP RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THROUGH 2O17/2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City of La Quinta ("City") is required to review and approve a Capital Improvement Program ("CIP"); and WHEREAS, the City is required to conduct a noticed public hearing for consideration and approval of the CIP; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing has been given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, specifically, the required notice was published on April 26, 2013 in The Desert Sun; and WHEREAS, the CIP is a five-year planning instrument used by the City to identify capital improvement needs and to coordinate financing and timing of those needs in a manner that maximizes the return to the public; and WHEREAS, the CIP is a statement of the City's goals, objectives and priorities for a five-year plan and the financial commitments required to accomplish those objectives; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 Program proposes approximately $26,501,483 in improvement projects and $193,988,708 of unfunded additional improvement projects over the five-year period, commencing on July 1, 2013 and ending June 30, 2018; and WHEREAS, the amount allocated from the CIP for first -year projects, called the "Capital Budget," proposes $19,837,787 in improvements, as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, there is inadequate funding within the City's General Fund or from other sources to completely and fully fund the improvements identified within the Capital Budget; and WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the public to completely fund all improvements identified within the Capital Budget. Resolution No. 2013- Capital Improvement Plan Adopted: May 7, 2013 Page 2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the La Quinta City Council, as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 Capital Improvement Program, approves the Capital Budget, and authorizes the inclusion of the Capital Budget into the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 operating budget, which appropriates funds for specific facilities, equipment and improvements. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 7th day of May, 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2017/201 �_A FINAL y APRIL 2013 I FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW This document is a statement of the City's goals, objectives, and priorities for a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the financial commitments required to accomplish those objectives. The purpose of the CIP is to provide the City with a long-range program for major municipal capital construction projects based on the systematic development of an accompanying financial plan. The CIP is a five-year planning instrument used by the City to identify capital improvement needs and to coordinate financing and timing of those needs in a manner that maximizes benefit to the public. As each annual budget is prepared, additional projects and priority needs are identified and added to the program to maintain a total five-year plan. The first year of the CIP is titled the Capital Budget and is based on existing fund balances and projected revenues. The capital budget is incorporated into the annual City "Operating" Budget, which appropriates funds for specific facilities, equipment and improvements. Projects slated for subsequent years in the program are approved on a planning basis only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are incorporated into the capital budget. The CIP will be updated annually and can be amended at any time based on revenue availability and changes in project priorities. As such, tentative City Council endorsement of the five-year program is desirable for the effective implementation of the City's goals and objectives. Capital improvements are major projects undertaken by the City that are generally not recurring on a long-term, annual basis. In this sense they are differentiated from Maintenance and Operation (M&O) expenditures for normal City operation. They include design, inspection, testing, project administration, land and/or right-of- way acquisition, construction or modification of buildings or facilities, and public infrastructure construction or modification. The CIP for Fiscal Years 2013/2014 through 2017/2018 includes a listing of projects by fiscal year priority and type of improvement. These projects are presented in summary on Exhibit 1 . The fiscal year a project is scheduled depends on the availability of specific funding sources, operation and program needs, and prior City Council policy. Projects include bridge, street, traffic signals, drainage, landscaping and lighting, parks, and city facilities. Only those projects that have identified funding sources in the five-year period are listed within a fiscal year. I Those projects that are designated as "additional projects" do not have identified funding sources through the term of the five-year program, or, in the case of DIF funded projects, a long-term collection period is required to develop the specified project. The additional projects are presented in summary on Exhibit 2. The identification of additional and/or alternative funding sources will be addressed during the annual review and approval of subsequent CIPs. Each project is described in brief detail including a description of the project, the location of the project, a breakdown of the estimated project cost, the revenue sources proposed to be used to fund the project, and an estimate of the annual M&O costs associated with the capital improvement. The completion of any specific capital improvement project may have a direct impact on the M&O budgets of the General Fund and other funds. An estimate of these future costs is necessary to assess whether there is financial capacity within the operating budget to cover these ongoing costs. All project costs included in the CIP are at current year project estimates. No inflation factors have been utilized in determining costs for projects in Fiscal Years 2013/2014 through 2017/2018. The 2012/2013 CIP identified $3,460,159 in capital improvement projects. Included in the CIP document is a "Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Project Status Report," which lists: one 2004/2005 project returned to add project list, one 2005/2006 project returned to add project list, one 2006/2007 project underway, two 2009/10 projects carried -over, three 2009/10 projects underway, one 2010/11 project underway, one 2010/11 project completed, two 201 1 /12 projects carried -over, four 201 1 /12 projects underway two 201 1 /12 project completed, six 2012/13 projects underway and two 2013/14 projects returned to the add project list. Also included is a "Carryover Project Summary" which provides the life -to -date expenditures for all active CIP projects. Fiscal Year 2013/2014 proposes $19,837,787 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of thirteen projects identified for this fiscal year. Two projects are recurring as part of a long term plan to fill missing sidewalk links and correct ADA deficiencies (199702-Sidewalks-Various Locations) and to install new or upgrade existing handicap access ramps (Project Number 199703-Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations) to comply with the ever evolving ADA standards. One project is recurring as part of implementing the pavement management plan (Project Number 201207-Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements). There are ten new projects proposed to complete the 2013/2014 CIP. These projects include: 201301 - La Quinta Museum ADA Improvements 201302 - Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements 01 201303 - Fritz Burns Park Pool Enhancements and ADA Improvements 201306 - SilverRock Canal Relocation 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 201309 - Highway 1 1 1 Landscape Enhancements (City Entrance Monuments) 201310 - Highway 1 1 1 Landscape Enhancements and Auto Display Pads 201311 - Community Center (Expansion of Senior Center) 201312 - La Quinta Park Portable Restroom 201313 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements Funding for the Quimby funded ADA improvement projects is proposed to be transferred from existing project 200712 — Community Park Acquisition. Fiscal Year 2014/2015 proposes $1,654,887 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of seven projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the sidewalk and handicap ramp recurring projects previously listed, the pavement management plan street improvements previously listed, the Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements previously listed, the Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements previously listed, the second year of the Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements and one new project: 201401 - Sports Complex ADA Improvements. Fiscal Year 2015/2016 proposes $1,661,809 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of seven projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the sidewalk and handicap ramp recurring projects previously listed, the pavement management plan street improvements previously listed, the Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements previously listed, the Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements previously listed, and two new projects, 201501 — YMCA Daycare ADA Improvements and 201502 - City Hall Council Chamber Improvements. Fiscal Year 2016/2017 proposes $1,442,000 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of six projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the sidewalk and handicap ramp recurring projects previously listed, the pavement management plan street improvements previously listed, the Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements previously listed, the Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements previously listed and the first payment of the Jefferson Street Interchange Improvements - 201308. Fiscal Year 2017/2018 proposes $1,905,000 in capital improvement projects. There are a total of six projects identified for this fiscal year. These projects include the sidewalk and handicap ramp recurring projects previously listed, the pavement management plan street improvements previously listed, the Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements previously listed, the Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements previously listed and the second tj payment of the Jefferson Street Interchange Improvements - 201308. There are eighty three Add Projects identified under the current CIP Additional Projects (Add Projects) list that are not scheduled for funding within the next five years. The costs associated with the implementation of these projects are estimated at $193,988,708. Please refer to the detail sheets located under the Additional Projects tab for project specific information regarding these additional projects. There are six developer completed projects currently identified with City Council approved Developer Reimbursement Agreements. The cost associated with these projects is estimated at $3,546,952. Summary information associated with these projects is presented in the Revenue Summary and Expenditure Summary Sections. In addition, detail sheets are presented at the tab labeled Developer Reimbursement Request (DRR). The information presented within this section provides the Council with a status and summary of Developer requested reimbursements for projects eligible for future funding by the Transportation DIF. In accordance with the approved agreements, reimbursement will be made when Transportation DIF funding becomes available. Each of the these projects have been prioritized based on following adopted prioritization criteria and have been ranked from highest to lowest priority for future funding. PTS 'DIF AMOUNT PAID BY DEVELOPER 0 0% of Construction Cost 2 $0 to 25% of Construction Costs 4 25% to 50% of Construction Cost 6 50% to 75% of Construction Costs 8 750 to 100% of Construction Costs 10 Over 100% of Construction Cost PTS ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION 1 Collector 2 Secondary/Modified Secondary 3 Primary Arterial (A or B) 4 Major Arterial/Augmented Major 5 Bride Improvement PTS ZDEFINABLE TRANSPORATION NEED 0 Landscape Only 1 Installed '/2 Median Curb 2 Installed Full Median Curb and Median Island Landscape 3 Improved One Lane of Travel and Installed Median 4 Improved Two Lanes of Travel and Installed Median 5 Improved Roadway to Ultimate General Plan Confi uration 3AGREEMENT LONGEVITY 0 1 Year or Less 1 Over 1 Year but Less than 2 MPTS 2 Over 2 Years but Less than 3 3 Over 3 Years but Less than 4 4 Over 4 Years but Less than 5 5 5 Years or More According to the current Cash Flow Model for Fiscal Year 2013/2014, Transportation DIF funding is not available at this time to reimburse the developers for eligible improvements. At the time funding does become available, staff will return with funding level recommendations for the list of prioritized projects. The following assumptions should be taken into account when reviewing the CIP: 'DIF Amount Paid by Developer — This criterion is weighted by a factor of 2. 2 Definable Transportation Need - only count if improvements are over and above what is normally required. 3 In the case of a point tie between two or more developer agreements, the date the agreement was approved by the City Council will break the tie and establish the priority order. 51 1. The City Council has reaffirmed prior policy to maintain sufficient General Fund emergency reserves, a General Fund reserve for cash flow purposes, and allocation of sufficient funds to cover current contracted and authorized capital improvement projects. 2. Because of increases in ongoing maintenance costs, the addition of completed improvements and the provisions of Proposition 218, the Lighting and Landscape District may not have sufficient funding in the future. The current fund balance and annual assessment revenues are inadequate to cover all future capital and operational cost increases. The alternative would be to continue to defer specific lighting and landscape improvements and/or reduce existing landscape maintenance activities until such time that other revenue sources are available. 5 201309— Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (City Entrance Monuments) Funding: PA1 Bond Proceeds $1,689,000 rr 201310— Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements and Auto Display Pads Funding: PA1 Bond Proceeds $ 2,329,629 201502 — City Hall Council Chamber Improvements Funding: Equipment Replacement Funds $ 201,809 201311— Community Center (Expansion of Senior Center) Funding Source: DIF Community Center and Quimby $ 3,308,725 t A 201301— Museum ADA Improvements Funding Source: Library Funds Funding Available: $ 369,769 i �t1 201303 — Fritz Burns Park Pool Enhancements and ADA Improvements Funding Source: Quimby Funds Funding Available: $ 1,321,000 201308 —Jefferson Street at I-10 Interchange 'H�I� psi: Ir k f N Improvements slsn tic�r'_r<` ` b Funding: TBD ` L 5,315,125 Fy. , r 4�w _�?— �-`drm k�F - ,.ir 201306 — SilverRock Canal Relocation -, 1 r,� �4.- �,j ;S b ¢4 Funding Source: TBD 41 Funding Available: $ 9,900,000 ilk {I C —Citywide Preventative Maintenance .,�� Fn-. 201313 Plan Improvements ;,; �. ' i. .� � ; •� Funding Source: Equipment Replacement Fund AMM 1� 201302 — Miscellaneous Parks ADA E" I it ; {� ,�} , j e r4 t �s Improvements x ` A. if Funding Source: Quimby Funds 1 -,; ;•'' FY 12-13 Funding Required: $71,430 �y -;; s " ► FY 13 14 Funding Required: $133,415 201307 — Citywide Traffic 5i nal '� o- '� i � f'�►, Maintenance Improvements -V� - y�� a ,�? r` �' 201207— Pavement Management Plan Street Developments Funding Source: Measure A Funds `` �� t• • � , � Funding Source: General Fund Legend $235,000 per year --• r �_ $1,000,000 per year. i �.. . LA QUINTk 199703 Handicap Access Ramp Various 199702-Sidewalks—Various Locations i� Locations Funding Source: General Fund n L ;!s 05 + 1 t, Funding Source: General Fund =� 55 000 per year. rnn� 20000 per year. ��s.,. fy 'i a~ •, ,, . I i I 201312 — La Quinta Park Portable Restroom Funding Source: Quimby Funds $ 188,224 201401— Sports Complex ADA Improvements Funding Source: Quimby Funds Funding Available: $ 161,472 201501—YMCA Daycare ADA Improvements Funding Source: Quimby Funds Funding Available: $ 100,000 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FISCAL YEARS 2013/14 - 2017/18 EXHIBIT 1 6 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS AD01 - Avenue 50 Bridge Improvement Spanning the Evacuation Channel AD02 - Washington Street Bridge Railing (Replacement) STREET IMPROVEMENTS AD03 - Fred Waring Drive (Adams St. to Port Maria Road) AD04 - Madison Street (Avenue 52 to Avenue 54) AD05 - Madison Street (Avenue 60 to Avenue 62) AD06 - Miles Ave. Median Curb and Median Island Landscaping (Seeley - Dune Palms) AD07 - PH 3 Washington Street Drainage Improvements (St. Francis of Assisi Parkway Median) AD08 - Avenue 50 (Washington Street to Madison Street) AD09 - Avenue 52 Street Improvements AD10 - Avenue 58 Street Improvements (PGA West south to Madison St.) AD11 - Avenue 62 Street Improvements (Monroe to Madison St.) AD12 - Madison Street Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation (Avenue 54 to Avenue 56) AD13 -Avenida Bermudas Storm Drain Improvement AD14 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Washington Street Intersection) AD15 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Adams Street Intersection) AD16 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Dune Palms Road Intersection) AD17 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Medians West City Limit to Adams Street) AD18 - Miles Avenue Reconstruction (Adams to Dune Palms) AD19 — Miles Avenue and Washington Street Intersection Improvements AD20 - Avenue 50 and Washington Street Intersection Improvements AD21 - Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction (Washington to Adams) AD22 - Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street Roundabout Improvements AD23 - Roadrunner Street and Dune Palms Road Traffic Circle TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AD24 - New Traffic Signal (Caleo Bay and Avenue 47) AD25 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street @ Lake La Quinta Drive) AD26 - New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms Road@ Corporate Center Drive) AD27 - New Traffic Signal (Eisenhower Drive @ Montezuma) AD28 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 50) AD29 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 52) AD30 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 54) AD31 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street at Avenue 54) AD32 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 58) AD33 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 60) AD34 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 52) AD35 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 54) AD36 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Airport Blvd.) AD37 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 58) AD38 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 60) AD39 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 61) AD40 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 62) AD41 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Dunbar) AD42 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street @ Via Sevilla) AD43 - New Traffic Signal (Avenue 50 @ Orchard) AD44 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Avenue 53) AD45 - Traffic Signal Citywide Central Control Unit SOUND ATTENUATION WALLS AD46 - Sound Attenuation Wall (E. Madison at Trilogy) AD24 AD07 7) AD26 A044 , - A,1)01 AD25 ✓r� µ Y . - A066 AD13 ` � AD I AD51 IN z AD64 AD3$ T-I AD21 AD03 AD15 A006 ADS' ADzh ADO,, AD09 I. AD34 AD58 AD47 — AD27 — f t' AD52-56 x ' AD49 ` 'i.` �' A05$ TK 4� '+ 1 `� "A, AD31 tip S \ AD32 1 I�- AD34 �T AD46 Legend • LA QUINTA ADu 0 0250.5 1 1.5 2 Wes 7 AD34 �..c2 AD12 AD36 AD47 AD37 AD41 ADO AD39 AD40 PUBLIC FACILITIES AD47 - City Hall Solar Panels AD48 - Library/Senior Center Solar Panels AD49 - Corporate Yard (Phases 2 and 3) AD50 - Southeast Area Fire Station AD51 - Black Box Theater AD52 - SilverRock Resort Irrigation and Pump Station Replacement AD53 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Infrastructure AD54 - SilverRock Resort Clubhouse - Construction Phase AD55 - SilverRock Resort Phase 11 Golf Course AD56 - SilverRock Resort Entry Feature PARKS AD57 - New Community Sports Park AD58 - SilverRock Resort Passive Park AD59 - Sports Complex Field Improvements MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AD60 - 5 Bus Shelters AD61 - Villiage Area Electric Vehicle Charging Station AD62 - Phase I (Part 2) Golf Cart Routes AD63 - Whitewater Channel Regional Bike Trail AD64 - Calle Estado/La Fonda Mid Block Crossing AD65 - Village Area Parking Structure AD66 - Calle Tampico Mid -Block Crossing AD67 - Calle Tampico Class II Bike Trail (Washington to Calle Rondo) AD68 - Avenue 50 Class II Bike Trail (Washington St. to west of Park Avenue) AD69 - Desert Club Drive Class III Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Avenue 52) AD70 - Eisenhower Drive Class II Bike Trail (Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa) AD71 - Eisenhower Drive Class III Bike Trail (Washington Street to Avenida Fernando) AD72 - Miles Avenue Class II Bike Trail (Adams Street to Dune Palms Road) AD73 -Avenue 52 Class II Bike Trail (Jefferson Street to Coachella Canal) AD74 - Avenida Bermudas Class II Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa, South Side Only) AD75 - Highway 111 Class II Bike Trail (Washington Street to Indio City Limits) AD76 - Jefferson Street Class II Bike Trail (Avenue 58 to Madison Street) AD77 - Madison Street Class 11 Bike Trail (Avenue 60 to Jefferson Street & Ave. 50 to Ave. 52) AD78 - Fred Waring Drive Class 11 Bike Trail (Washington Street to Jefferson Street) AD79 - Avenue 50 Class III Bike Trail (Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street) AD80 - Avenue 58 Class II Bike Trail (Just west of Monroe Street to Monroe Street) AD81 - Avenue 60 Class I I Bike Trail (Monroe Street to Eastern City Limit) AD82 - Avenue 62 Class 11 Bike Trail (Madison Street to Monroe Street) AD83 - Monroe Street Class II Bike Trail (Ave. 54 to Mtn. View Lane & Ave. 58 to Ave. 62) CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FISCAL YEARS 2013/14 - 2017/18 EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 PROJECT STATUS REPORT 2004/05 PROJECT RETURNED TO ADD PROJECT LIST 200407C - Traffic Signal (Jefferson @ Ave 53) 2005/06 PROJECT RETURNED TO ADD PROJECT LIST 200505 - Traffic Signal (Avenue 50 @ Orchard) 2006/07 PROJECTS UNDERWAY 200606 - Adams Street Bridge Spanning the Whitewater River - Construction Phase 2009/10 PROJECTS CARRIED -OVER 200904 - Dune Palms Road Street Improvements - On Hold 200911 - Washington Street Apartments Rehabilitation - On Hold 2009/10 PROJECTS UNDERWAY 200901 - Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the All American Canal - Indio Lead - Under Construction 200902 - Madison (Avenue 50 to Avenue 52) - Indio Lead - Phase I Under Construction 200913 - Relocation of Coachella Canal at SilverRock Resort - CVWD Lead -Under Design 2010/11 PROJECTS UNDERWAY 201011 - Eisenhower Drive @ Sinaloa Traffic Signal or Round -A -Bout - Under Design 2010/11 PROJECTS COMPLETED 201006 - Washington Street Dual Left Turn Lanes @ Avenue 48 2011/12 PROJECTS CARRIED -OVER 201 109 - Westward Ho/Dune Palms Road Affordable Housing Improvements - On Hold 201110 - Washington Street Senior Housing - On Hold 2011/12 PROJECTS UNDERWAY 201 101 - Highway 111 at Washington St. Intersection Improvements - Under Design 201 102 - Coral Mountain Apartments - Under Construction 201 104 - Fred Waring Drive Median Island Landscape Improvements - Under Construction 201 105 - Dune Palms Road Bridge Improvements - Applied for Grant Funding 2011/12 PROJECTS COMPLETED 201112 - Stabilization of City Owned Properties 201113 - Senior Center HVAC Upgrade Project 2012/13 PROJECTS UNDERWAY 201201 - Adams Street Signal and Street Improvements - Under Design 201202 - Sports Complex Lighting Rehabilitation and Expansion - Under Design 201203 - La Quinta Park ADA Improvements - Under Design 201204 - Civic Center Park ADA Improvements - Under Design 201205 - Library ADA Improvement Project - Under Design 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements - Under Design 2013/14 PROJECTS RETURNED TO ADD PROJECT LIST 201304 - Miles Avenue and Washington Street Intersection Improvements 201305 - Avenue 50 and Washington Street Intersection Improvements CITY OF LA QUINTA FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CARRYOVER EXPENDITURE SUMMARY AS OF: 01/31/12 PROJECT NUMBER FINANCE OBJECT NO. PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET PRIOR YEARS fY 10l11 BUDGET FY 10/11 YTD EXPENDITURES TOTAL LIFE TO DATE BALANCE REMAINING 1651 SIDEWALKS VARIOUS LOCATIONS 55,000.00 0.00 55.000.00 0.00 0.00 55.000.00 1652 HANDICAP RAMPS -VARIOUS LOCATIONS 20,000.00 0.00 20.000.00 0.0Q 0.00 20.000.00 200407C 1 745 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - JEFFERSON & 53 174,011 23 5.530.23 168.481.00 0.00 5,530.23 168.481.00 1751 KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE TAX 30.000.00 0.00 30.000.00 8,480.50 8.480.50 21.519.50 2000505 1757 TRAFFIC SIGNAL-AVE 50 & ORCHARD 174.999.74 8.424.74 166,575.00 0.00 8,424.74 166.575.00 200606 1762 ADAMS STREET BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 13.098.120.19 4.536,166.19 8,551.954,00 1.698,309.70 6.234,475.89 6.853,644.30 1767 COSTCOIMPROVEMENTS 375.000.00 0.00 375,000,00 97.59274 97.592.74 277,407.26 1770 EMBASSY SUITES TOT 26,094.00 0.00 26,094.00 32.255.80 32.255.80 6.161.80 200608 1773 SILVERROCK RESORT GOLF COURSE PHASE II 423.994,51 423,994.51 0.00 0.00 423.994.51 0.00 200610 1 774 SILVERROCK RESORT CLUB HOUSE 2,092,238-69 2.092,238.69 0.00 0.00 2.092.238.69 0.00 200607 1775 SILVERROCK RESORT INFRASTRUCTURE 1.521,402-60 1521,402.60 0.00 0.00 1.521,402.60 0.D0 200611 1776 ISILVERROCK RESORT ENTRY FEATURE & ROADS 159,042.91 159,042.91 0.00 0.00 159.042,91 0.00 200709 1781 PHASE 1 - GOLF CART ROUTES 1.687.02 1,687.02 0.00 0.00 1.687.02 0.00 200712 1783 COMMUNITY PARK LAND ACQUISITION 7.570.495.17 16,562.17 7.553,933.00 0.00 16.562,17 7.553.933.00 200901 1803 AVE 50 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS SPANNING THE ALL AMERICAN CANAL 350.000.50 201,252.50 148.748.00 0.00 201.252,50 148.748.00 200902 1804 MADISON - AVE 50 - AVE 52 575,000.00 12,000-00 563.000.00 13,237.50 25.237,50 549,762.50 200904 1806 DUNE PALMS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS 109.361.646 109,361.66 0.00 0.00 109.361,66 0.00 200911 1813 WASHINGTON ST APTS REHABILITATION 18,906.474.11 385.560.11 18,520,914.00 65,431.69 450.991,80 18.455.482.31 200913 1815 RELOCATION OF COACHELLA CANAL AT SILVERROCK 9,256.824.06 63.152-06 9.193.672.00 2,760.50 65.912.56 9.190,911.50 201006 1841 WASHINGTON ST DUAL LEFT TURN LANE @ AVE 48 678,891.17 149,510.17 529.381.00 483,861.32 633.371.49 45,519.68 201007 1842 HWY 111 RIGHT TURN LANE @ WASHINGTON 4,277.00 4,277.00 0.00 0.00 4.277.00 0.00 201011 1846 ROUNDABOUT - EISENHOWER @ SINALOA 430,000.40 104,278.40 325.722,00 50.533.25 154,811.65 275,188.75 - 1852 CORAL MOUNTAIN APARTMENTS 29.190,302.38 3,908,944.38 25.281.358.DD 25.281.357.96 29.190,302,34 0.04 1856 WELL SITE MITIGATION 1.266.875.00 1,266.875.00 0.00 0.00 1,266,875.00 0.00 201 101 1867 HWY 111 & WASHINGTON ST IMPROVEMENTS 776.644.30 5.056,30 771,588.00 38,691.95 43,748.25 732.B96.05 201208 1868 CALLE SINALOA SIDEWALK 255,722.50 1,937.50 253.785.00 10,460.14 12,3W,64 243,324.86 201103 1869 HWY 111 SIDEWALK 3.587.50 3.587.50 0.00 0.00 3.587,50 0.00 201104 1870 FRED WARING MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS 1.204.378.68 60,265.68 1,144.113.00 61.280.73 121,54641 1,082.832.27 201105 1871 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 12.407.999.88 11,408.88 12.396.591.00 1,660.17 13,069,05 12.394,930.83 201106i07 1 1873 FRED WARING & MILES AVE RECONSTRUCTION 2.399.786.00 0.00 2.399.786,00 0.00 0.00 2.399.786.00 1874 TESTA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 9,991,282.00 0.00 9.991.282.00 0.00 0.00 9.991.282.00 1875 DUNE PALMS MOBILE HOME ESTATES ACQUISITION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 201 113 1876 SENIOR CENTER HVAC UPGRADE 14l,583.10 140,864.10 719.DO 210.00 141.074A0 509.00 201 112 1877 STABILIZATION FOR CITY-QWNEO PROPERTY 263.448.28 165.28 263,283.00 165.45B.28 165.623.56 97.824.72 201202 1878 SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING REHAB & EXPANSION 888.875.00 0.00 868,875.00 2,9841 25 2,984.25 B85.890.75 201203 1879 LA OUINTA PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS 237,169.00 0.00 237,169.00 0.00 0.00 237,169.00 201204 1880 CIVIC CENTER PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS 29,759.00 0.00 29.759.00 0.00 0.00 29.759.00 201205 1881 LIBRARY PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS 221.279.00 0.00 221.279.00 0.00 0.00 221,279,00 2.01206 1882 SENIOR CENTER ADA IMPROVEMENTS 287,577,1 0.00 287.577.00 0.00 0.00 287.577.00 201207 1884 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT & SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 1,453,651.60 0.00 1,453.651.00 763.10 763.10 1 452.887,90 201 . 1 1885 ADAMS STREET SIGNAL &STREET IMPROVEMENTS 720,500.00 0.00 720.500.00 3,43225 3,432.25 717,067 75 TOTAL EXPENDITURES: 117,763,334.58 15.193,545.58 102,569,789.00 28,018,761.83 43,212,307.41 74,551,027.17 CITY OF LA OUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project p - Project Description General Fund RDA 1 Housing Bonds RDA 2002 Bonds Quimby Funds APP Funds DIF Community Center DIF Transportation DIF ParkslRec DIF Maint Facility Measure A DIF Fire Other Total 201312014 2014/2015 FY 201312014 SUBTOTAL: 1.075,000 0 13,218,629 3,683.137 0 1,206,191 0 0 0 235,000 0 419.780 19,837,787 FY 201412015 SUBTOTAL: 1.075,000 0 0 294,387 0 0 0 0 0 235.000 0 $0,000 1,854,887 201512016 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 55.000 55.000 201612017 FY 2015/2016 SUBTOTAL: 1,075.000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 235.000 0 261.809 1,661,809 FY 201612017 SUBTOTAL: 1,075.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 317,000 0 50,000 1,442,000 201712018 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 55.000 55,000 199701. 14-01 sn A�... Ram,. V, m 1 —Ml— 20 nnn 20.000 FY 2017/2018 SUBTOTAL: 1,075.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 780,000 0 50,000 1,905.000 TOTAL FISCAL YEARS 2013114 THROUGH 2O17118: 5,375,000 0 13,218,629 4,078,074 0 1,208,191 0 0 0 1,802,000 0 821,589 28.601,443 Additional Projects 10 CITY OF LA OUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AO55 - SllverRock Resort Phase it Golf Course 21,060,000 (6) 21 060,000 SUBTOTAL ADD PROJECTS: 0 0 0 385,376 0 0 30.787.217 7J30,537 2,936,290 0 2198,500 150,550,788 193,988,708 DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS (APPROVED) DRA1 - Toll Brothers Tract 30357 (Ave 50 1/2 Median and Median LS - Jefferson to Madison - Part of SUBTOTAL DEVELOPER DIF REIMBURSEMENTS: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,546,952 0 0 0 0 0 3.646.962 GRAND TOTAL (1311447118, ADD PROJECTS AND DRA): OTHER REVENUE SOURCES (1) Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) (2) Slate Transportation Program (STP) (3) Stale Gas Tax Revenue (4) Bike Lane Account ISLA) (5) Slate Measure "A" Funds 5,375,000 4,463,450 0 1,206,191 34.334,169 7,130,537 2,936,290 (6) To Be Determined (TBO) (11) County of Riverside (16) Developer Contribution (7) Developer Bonds (12) CDBG (17) RZH Recreation Grant (8) City of Indio (13) County Library DIF (18) Department of Parks and Recreation (9) Park Equip Replacement Fund (14) City Library Fund (19) SR2S Grant (10) County Fire Credit Fund (15) RCTC (20) Equipment Replacement Fund 2.198,500 151,372.377 224.037.143 (21) City of Indian Wells (22) 4% Tax Credits (23) AOMD Mitigation Funds 11 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Project # Project Description Administration Engineering Construction Inspection Professional Contingency Other Total 2013/2014 ous 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations 282 1,411 14,109 1,376 1,411 1,411 20,000 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1,000,000 201301 - La Quinta Museum ADA Improvements 5217 26087 260867 25435 26087 26087 369,780 201302 - Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements 1008 5039 50391 4913 5039 5039 71,429 201303 - Fritz Burns Park Pool Enhancements and ADA Improvements 47373 94746 947463 92378 18949 120091 1,321,000 201306 - SilverRock Canal Relocation 150000 220000 7500000 316875 120000 893125 9,200,000 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 1000 232000 2000 235,000 201309- Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (City Entrance Monuments) 34000 127163 1271628 123984 63581 68644 1,689,000 201310 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements and Auto Display Pads 84884 169767 1697670 165523 84884 126901 2,329,629 201311 - Community Center (Expansion of Senior Center) 118656 237312 2373122 231379 47462 300793 3,308,725 201312 - La Quinta Park Portable Restroom 6750 13500 135000 13163 2700 17111 188,224 201313 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 1793 3586 35861 3496 717 4546 50,000 FY 2011/2012 SUBTOTAL: 476,740 942,492 16,299,411 1,081,805 394,711 1,642,628 0 19,837,787 201412015 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 777 3,880 38,800 3,783 3,880 3,880 55,000 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations 282 1,411 14,109 1,376 1,411 1,411 20,000 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1,000,000 201302 - Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements 1,882 9,412 94.120 9,177 9,412 9,412 133,415 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 1000 232000 2000 235,000 201316 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 1793 3586 35861 3496 717 4546 50,000 201401 -Sports Complex ADA Improvements 2,278 11,391 113,913 11,107 11,391 11,391 161,471 FY 2012/2013 SUBTOTAL: 33,012 69,680 1,271,303 128,439 46,811 105,640 0 1,654,886 2015/2016 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 777 3,880 38,800 3,783 3,880 3,880 55,000 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations 282 1,411 14,109 1,376 1,411 1,411 20,000 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1,000,000 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 201316 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 1000 1793 3586 232000 35861 2000 3496 717 4546 235,000 50,000 201501 - YMCA Daycare ADA Improvements 201502 - City Hall Council Chamber Improvements 1411 7237 7055 14474 70547 144744 6878 14113 7055 2895 7055 18346 100,001 201.809 FY 2013/2014 SUBTOTAL: 37,500 70,407 1,278,561 129,146 35,958 110,238 0 1,661,810 2016/2017 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 777 3,880 38,800 3,783 3,880 3,880 55,000 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations 282 1.411 14,109 1,376 1,411 1.411 20.000 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1,000,000 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 1000 232000 2000 235.000 201308 - Jefferson Street at 1-10 Interchange Improvements 82000 82,000 201316 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 1793 3586 35861 3496 717 4546 50,000 2017/2018 FY 2014/2015 SUBTOTAL: 28,852 48,877 1,145,270 108,155 26,008 84,837 0 1,442,000 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations 777 3,880 38,800 3,783 3,880 3,880 55,000 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations 282 1,411 14,109 1,376 1,411 1,411 20,000 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1.000,000 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements 1000 232000 2000 235,000 201308 - Jefferson Street at 1-10 Interchange Improvements 545000 545,000 201316 - Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements 1793 3586 35861 3496 717 4546 50.000 FY 2016/2016 SUBTOTAL: 28,852 48,877 1,608,270 108,155 26,008 84,837 0 1,905,000 SUBTOTAL FISCAL YEARS 2013/2014 THROUGH 2O17/2018 604,957 1,180,332 20,602,815 1,555,701 529,497 2,028,181 0 26,501,483 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 12 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Project # Project Description Administration Engineering Construction Inspection Professional Contingency Other Total AD01 - Avenue 50 Bridge Improvement Spanning the Evacuation Channel 94.000 376,000 2,622,600 291,400 376,000 3,760,000 AD02 - Washington Street Bridge Railing (Replacement) 39,000 78,000 780,000 76,050 97,305 1,070,355 STREET IMPROVEMENTS AD03 - Fred Waring Drive (Adams St. to Port Maria Road) 101,826 203,651 1,328,825 198,560 203,651 2,036,513 AD04 - Madison Street (Avenue 52 to Avenue 54) 43,130 86,260 862,600 84,104 86,260 1,162,354 AD05 - Madison Street (Avenue 60 to Avenue 62) 110,117 220,234 2,202,341 170,681 405,506 3,108,879 AD06 - Miles Ave. Median Curb and Median Island Landscaping (Seeley -Dune Palms) 45,838 91,678 916,779 71,050 112,535 1,237,880 AD07 - PH 3 Washington Street Drainage Improvements (St. Francis of Assisi Parkway Median) 41,000 82,200 822,000 80,145 106,650 1,131.995 AD08 - Avenue 50 (Washington Street to Madison Street) 47,275 94,550 945,500 92,186 94,597 1,274,108 AD09 -Avenue 52 Street Improvements 98,268 196,535 1,965,350 191,622 196,536 2,648,311 AD10 - Avenue 58 Street Improvements (PGA West south to Madison St.) 256,804 513,609 5,136,094 398,048 630,456 6,935,011 AD11 - Avenue 62 Street Improvements (Monroe to Madison St_) 330,015 660,030 6,600,302 511,523 150,158 8,252,028 AD12 - Madison Street Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation (Avenue 54 to Avenue 56) 48.000 120,000 1,200,000 117,000 120,000 172,370 1,777,370 AD13 - Avenida Bermudas Storm Drain Improvement 10,210 20,420 204,200 19,910 63,148 317,888 AD14 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Washington Street Intersection) 36,640 73,280 732,800 71,448 91,418 1,005,586 AD15 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Adams Street Intersection) 34,418 68,836 688,360 67,115 85,873 944,602 AD16 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Dune Palms Road Intersection) 32,240 64,480 644,800 62,868 80,439 884,827 AD17 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Medians West City Limit to Adams Street) 32,030 64,062 640,618 62,461 80,829 880,000 AD18 - Miles Avenue Reconstruction (Adams to Dune Palms) 20,923 41,845 418,451 40,799 20.923 30,280 573,221 AD19 - Miles Avenue and Washington Street Intersection Improvements 19638 39276 392765 38295 30000 77996 597,970 AD20 - Avenue 50 and Washington Street Intersection Improvements 2150 6000 43000 4193 4300 59,643 AD21 - Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction (Washington to Adams) 70150 140300 1403000 136793 70150 192386 2,012,779 AD22 - Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street Roundabout Improvements 25000 40000 742500 97500 20000 75000 1,000,000 AD23 - Roadrunner Street and Dune Palms Road Traffic Circle TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS 18,628 44,000 440,000 42,900 11,000 43,472 600,000 AD24 - New Traffic Signal (Caleo Bay and Avenue 47) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD25 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street a Lake La Quinta Drive) 21.500 43,000 321.425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD26 - New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms Road @ Corporate Center Drive) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD27 - New Traffic Signal (Eisenhower Drive @ Montezuma) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD28 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 50) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD29 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 52) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD30 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 54) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD31 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street at Avenue 54) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD32 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 58) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD33 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 60) 21.500 43.000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD34 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 52) 21,500 43.000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD35 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 54) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD36 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Airport Blvd.) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD37 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 58) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD38 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street 9, Avenue 60) 21,500 43,000 321.425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD39 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 61) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430.000 AD40 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 62) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD41 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Dunbar) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD42 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street @ Via Sevilla) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD43 - New Traffic Signal (Avenue 50 @ Orchard) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD44 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Avenue 53) 21,500 43,000 321,425 33,325 10,750 430,000 AD45 - Traffic Signal Citywide Central Control Unit 55.000 110.000 935.000 1.100,000 AD46 - Sound Attenuation Wall (E. Madison at Trilogy) 7,000 14.000 140,000 13,650 17,465 192,115 PUBLIC FACILITIES AD47 - City Hall Solar Panels 50,000 950.000 1,000,000 AD48 - Library/Senior Center Solar Panels 50,000 950,000 1,000,000 AD49 - Corporate Yard (Phases 2 and 3) 236,650 59,711 4,721,000 460,298 541,735 6,018,794 AD50 - Southeast Area Fire Station 163,154 326,308 3,263,080 318,150 326,308 4,397,000 AD51 - Black Box Theater 60,000 300,000 2,047,500 292,500 60,000 240,000 3,000,000 AD52 - SilverRock Resort Irrigation and Pump Station Replacement 45,630 228,150 1,557,124 222,446 45,630 182,520 2,281,500 AD53 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Infrastructure 18,278,533 1,722,293 2,222,314 22,223,140 AD54 - SilverRock Resort Clubhouse - Construction Phase 508,240 1,836,000 18,911,699 775,000 1,655,571 1,725,500 (3) 25,412,010 13 CITY OF LA QUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Project # Project Description Administration Engineering Construction Inspection Professional Contingency Other Total AD55 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course 421,200 2,106,000 15,589,665 1,468,935 1,474,200 21,060,000 AD56 - SilverRock Resort Entry Feature 71,800 351,000 4,289,739 322;262 559,423 5,594,224 AD57 - New Community Sports Park 200.000 750.000 16,725,000 400.000 125.000 1.800,000 20.000,000 AD58 - SilverRock Resort Passive Park 100,000 750,000 7.725,000 400.000 125,000 900,000 10,000,000 AD59 -Sports Complex Field and Lighting Improvements 111,023 555,113 3,677,620 541,235 111,023 555,113 5,551.127 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AD60 - 5 Bus Shelters 12,500 62,500 420,313 60,937 18,750 50,000 625,000 AD61 - Villiage Area Electric Vehicle Charging Station 4,117 15,000 150,000 14,625 7,500 14,596 205,838 AD62 - Phase I (Part 2) Golf Cart Routes 25,000 50,519 505,186 49,256 25,259 25,518 680,738 AD63 - Whitewater Channel Regional Bike Trail 85000 170000 1700000 165750 170000 2,290,750 AD64 - Calle Estado/La Fonda Mid Block Crossing 5,000 8,537 85,370 6,616 9,748 115,271 AD65 - Village Area Parking Structure 150,000 750,000 5,043,750 731,250 225,000 600,000 7,500,000 AD66 - Calle Tampico Mid -Block Crossing 4,500 15,491 154,906 15,103 3,500 21,500 215,000 AD67 - Calle Tampico Class II Bike Trail (Washington to Calle Rondo) 750 1,500 15,000 1,463 1,500 20,213 AD68 - Avenue 50 Class II Bike Trail (Washington St. to west of Park Avenue) 1,500 3,000 30,000 2.925 3,000 40,425 AD69 - Desert Club Drive Class III Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Avenue 52) 400 800 8,000 780 800 10,780 AD70 - Eisenhower Drive Class II Bike Trail (Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa) 500 1,000 10,000 975 1,000 13,475 AD71 - Eisenhower Drive Class III Bike Trail (Washington Street to Avenida Fernando) 1,000 2,000 20,000 1,950 2,000 26,950 AD72 - Miles Avenue Class II Bike Trail (Adams Street to Dune Palms Road) 1,250 2,500 25,000 2,438 2,500 33,688 AD73 - Avenue 52 Class II Bike Trail (Jefferson Street to Coachella Canal) 1,000 2,000 20,000 1,950 2,000 26,950 AD74 - Avenida Bermudas Class II Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa, South Side Only) 1,000 2,000 20,000 1,950 2,000 26,950 AD75 - Highway 111 Class II Bike Trail (Washington Street to Indio City Limits) 4,250 8,500 85,000 8,288 8,500 114,538 AD76 - Jefferson Street Class II Bike Trail (Avenue 58 to Madison Street) 9,750 19,500 195,000 19,013 19,500 262,763 AD77 - Madison Street Class II Bike Trail (Avenue 60 to Jefferson Street & Ave. 50 to Ave. 52) 9.500 19,000 190,000 18,525 19,000 256,025 AD78 - Fred Waring Drive Class II Bike Trail (Washington Street to Jefferson Street) 3,750 7,500 75,000 7,313 7,500 101,063 AD79 - Avenue 50 Class III Bike Trail (Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street) 800 1,600 16,000 1,560 1.600 21,560 AD80 - Avenue 58 Class II Bike Trail (Just west of Monroe Street to Monroe Street) 750 1,500 15,000 1,463 1,500 20,213 AD81 - Avenue 60 Class II_Bike Trail (Monroe Street to Eastern City Limit) 500 1,000 10,000 975 1,000 13,475 AD82 - Avenue 62 Class II Bike Trail (Madison Street to Monroe Street) 2,500 5,000 50,000 4,875 5,000 67,375 AD83 - Monroe Street Class II Bike Trail (Ave. 54 to Mtn. View Lane & Ave. 58 to Ave. 62) 6,250 12,500 125,000 12,188 12,500 168,438 SUBTOTAL ADD PROJECTS 4,319,464 12,877,475 147,212,295 11,695,413 1,244,485 14,914,076 1,725,500 193,988,708 DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTAGREEMENTS (DRA) DRA1 - Toll Brothers Tract 30357 (Ave 50 1/2 Median and Median LS - Jefferson to Madison - Part of AD 11) 627 972 (2) 627,972 DRA2 - Lennar Homes Tract 29323 (Fred Waring Drive Median LS - Part of AD04) 586,670 (2) 586,670 DRA3 - Innovative Communities Tract 34243 (Ave 58 Street Improvements - Part of AD13) 130,800 (2) 130,800 DRA4 - Madison Club Tract 33076 (Ave 52 1/2 Street and Median and Median LS - Madison St to 1/2 Mile east of Madison St - Part of AD12) 669,920 (2) 669,920 DRA5 - ND La Quinta Partners Tract 29894 (Ave 52 Median IS Landscape - Part of AD12) 1.344.690 (2) 1.344,690 OS SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 3,546,962 3,546,962 GRAND TOTAL (13114-17118, ADD PROJECTS AND DRA) OTHER EXPENSE CATEGORIES (1) CVAG Reimbursement (2) Developer Reimbursement 4,924,421 14, 057, 807 167, 815,110 13, 251,114 (3) FF&E Owners Items (4) Land Acquisition 1,773,982 16,942,257 5,272,452 224,037,142 (5) Loan Payoff (6) Non -Profit Developer Fee 14 Prelatl Prq.1O.. - CITY OF LA OUINTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSE SUMMARY TOTAL ADDITIONAL PROJECTS: $2,99SA10 GRAND TOTAL OPERATING COSTS: 10 $0 10 f0 WIGAI0 15 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of sidewalks at various locations. The new sidewalk sections are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O , !:^-,., . -;] Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014; 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 il Revenue Amount Total 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06130/11 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 777 777 777 777 777 3,885 Engineering 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Construction 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000 Inspection 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 18,915 Professional 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Contingency 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2 .14 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 16 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of handicap access ramps at various locations. The new handicap ramps are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013I20-t 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 011 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 10: 201 2014/2015 2015/2016 201612017 2017/2018 Total Administration 282 282 282 282 282 282 Engineering 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Construction 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 Inspection 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 Professional 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Contingency 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Aperopriation 06/30/11 20, : 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% _ _ j Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 17 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Description The project will slurry seal and reconstruct roadways within the City in accordance with the future recommendations developed by the Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 25,000 25000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,006 Engineering 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Construction 742,500 742500 742,500 742,500 742,500 3,712,500 Inspection 97,500 97500 97,500 97,500 97,500 487,500 Professional 20,000 20000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Contingency 75,000 75000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.000,000 1.000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 �0.. 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 lu CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201301 - Museum ADA Improvement Project Description This project will construct ADA improvements at the Museum based on the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 10; 3 20 4 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City Library Fund 369,780 369,780 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 369,780 0 0 0 0 369,780 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance AIO Appropriation 06/30/12 IM 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 5,217 5,217 Engineering 26,087 26,087 Construction 260,867 260,867 Inspection 25,435 25,435 Professional 26,087 26,087 Other: Contingency 26,087 26,087 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 369,780 0 0 0 0 369,780 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30112 013 20 4 2014/2015 2016/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 19 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Parks Project: 201302 - Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements Description This project will construct ADA improvements at Various City Parks based on the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 20 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 71,429 133,415 204,844 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 71.429 133,415 0 0 0 204,844 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A10 Appropriation 06/30/12 20 3 0 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,008 1,882 2,890 Engineering 5,039 9,412 14,451 Construction 50,391 94,120 144,511 Inspection 4,913 9,177 14,090 Professional 5,039 9,412 14,451 Other: Contingency 5,039 9,412 14,451 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 71,429 133,415 0 0 0 204,844 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06/30/12 120 4 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016I2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 20 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Project: 201303 - Fritz Burns Park Pool Enhancements Description The expansion of the Fritz Burns Pool aquatic facility would include additional amenities such as a water feature, spray pad, water slide, shade structures, changing areas, pool chillers and new fencing. The original 25 yard pool and wading pool were built in 1997, and are no longer enough to entertain children and attract families to the pool facility. The new enhancements would attract users to increase participation levels, increase physical activity at the pool, and increase the number of resident pool party rentals and expand the event opportunities. It is anticipated that the exposure of the improved facility would also increase participation in the pool's traditional aquatic Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O CategoA ro riation 06/30/12 24 20t 2014I2015 2015l2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other. Quimby 1,321,000 1,321,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1.321.000 0 0 0 0 1.321,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/0 Appropriation 06/30/12 201412015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 47,373 47,373 Engineering 94,746 94,746 Construction 947,463 947,463 Inspection 92,378 92,378 Professional 18,949 18,949 Other: Contingency 120,091 120,091 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,321,000 0 0 0 0 1.321.000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06130/12 0. 3 20 4 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 1,200 1,200 1,200 1.200 3,600 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 21 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201306 - SilverRock Canal Relocation Description This project will fill in the existing canal that crosses the SilverRock Golf Course and repair any damage done to the adjacent golf course in the course of the construction. Additionally, this project may also upgrade and/or revise the existing holes adjacent to the canal to improve playability. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 RDA 2002 Bond Proceeds 9,200,000 9,200,000 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: TBD 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 9,200,000 0 0 0 0 9.200,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 150,000 150,000 Engineering 220,000 220,000 Construction 7,500,000 7,500,000 Inspection 316,875 316,875 Professional 120,000 120,000 Other: Contingency 893,125 893,125 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 9,200,000 0 0 0 0 9,200,000 Operatinq Costs Prior Balance A1O Category Appropriation 06130/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 22 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Re -wire Projects Description This project will fill re -wire the traffic signals at two intersections each year. The wiring at many of the intersections is old and starting to fray, which can cause a failure the traffic signal. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 Z0; 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 0 2 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Engineering 0 Construction 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 185,000 Inspection 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Operatinq Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 20,1 20 4 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 23 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201309 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (City Entrance Monuments) Descrietion The proposed improvements will enhance the city entrance monuments and adjoining landscape, irrigation and low level lighting in accordance with the recommendations presented within the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines, dated January 20, 2011. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: PA1 Bond Proceeds 1,689,000 1,689,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1,689,000 0 0 0 0 1,689,000 Expense Amounts Cate o Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 201512016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 34,000 34,000 Engineering 127,163 127,163 Construction 1,271,628 1,271,628 Inspection 123,984 123,984 Professional 63,581 63,581 Other: Contingency 68,644 68,644 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,689,000 0 0 0 0 1,689,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 24 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201310 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements and Auto Display Pads )escrption 'he proposed improvements will enhance the landscape, irrigation and low level lighting on the south Highway 111 parkway adjacent t( ie La Quinta Auto Park. The existing planting and lighting will be removed and replaced, existing irrigation system will be modified, nev auto display bads will be installed, and new Auto Center ID signs will be installed. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance AIO CategoA ro Appropriation 06/30/12 2M2� 2014I2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: PA1 Bond Proceeds 2,329,629 2,329,629 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 2,329,629 0 0 0 0 2,329,629 LA VGIIaC M111V V II W 7 Cate o A ro riation O6I30112 Qi3i2 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 84,884 84,884 Engineering 169,767 169,767 Construction 1,697,670 1,697,670 Inspection 165,523 165,523 Professional 84,884 84,884 Other: Contingency 126,901 126,901 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 2.329,629 0 0 0 0 2,329,629 Clnwralinrl C:nefc Prior Balance A/O Categog Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot J Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 25 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201311 - Community Center (Expansion of Senior Center) Description Design and construct approximately 5,000 sq. ft. of new recreational space to be added to the current Senior Center facility. The space will consist of a fitness area, classroom space for fitness classes and leisure enrichment programs, additional restroom facilities and an updated reception area with increased visibility of customers. The outdoor area will be enhanced with improved seating, shade and herb and small vegetable gardens the users will maintain. The facility will also be implemented with Wi-Fi, updated finishes and furnishings and complete the ADA requirements. Revenue Amounts New Aperopriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 0 3.2 .141 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 1,206,191 1,206,191 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 2,102,534 2,102,534 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 3,308,725 0 0 0 0 3,308,725 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 118,656 118,656 Engineering 237,312 237,312 Construction 2,373,122 2,373,122 Inspection 231,379 231,379 Professional 47,462 47,462 Other: Contingency 300,793 300,793 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 3,308,725 0 0 0 0 3,308,725 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30112 2 ; _ 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,006 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Staff will be presenting new fees at a future date for cost recovery of the General Fund operation costs for the additional space. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 26 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201312 - la Quinta Park Portable Restroom Description Purchase and installation of a pre -fabricated restroom at La Quinta Park (similar to the one at Colonel Mitchell Paige). Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30112 4. 20 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 188,224 188,224 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 188,224 0 0 0 0 188,224 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06130112 M 201412015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 6,750 Total 6,750 Administration Engineering 13,500 13,500 Construction 135,000 135,000 Inspection 13,163 13,163 Professional 2,700 2,700 Other: Contingency 17,111 17,111 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 188,224 0 0 0 0 188,224 Operatinq Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 M0,,11120141 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 2,050 2,050 2,050 2,050 8,200 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Based on heavy demands during youth sports events. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 27 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201313 -Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements )escription teplacement of HVAC units at several older City owned facilities as part of the City's Preventative Maintenance Plan and Facilities kssessment. Many HVAC units are atlover useful life. Newer systems are more energy efficient resulting in energy cost reductions in tho 3eneral Fund. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Batance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 F276T97 ,'. 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 tx ense Amounts Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 8,965 Engineering 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 17,931 Construction 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 179,305 Inspection 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 17,482 Professional 717 717 717 717 717 3,586 Other: Contingency 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,547 22,731 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,001 250,000 f)naratinn Cncts Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2 , _ 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations iescription 'his annual project provides for the construction of sidewalks at various locations. The new sidewalk sections are selected fror ie prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 201312014 2015/2016 201612017 2017I2018 Total General Fund 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 011 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275.000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 777 777 777 777 777 3,885 Engineering 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Construction 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000 Inspection 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 18,915 Professional 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Contingency 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Oneratina Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 20l3/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 29 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of handicap access ramps at various locations. The new handicap ramps are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Categog Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2016/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100A00 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 282 282 282 282 282 282 Engineering 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Construction 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 Inspection 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 Professional 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Contingency 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Cate o Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 'Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 30 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Description The project will slurry seal and reconstruct roadways within the City in accordance with the future recommendations developed by the Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,006 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 25,000 25000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,005 Engineering 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Construction 742,500 742500 742,500 742,500 742,500 3,712,500 Inspection 97,500 97500 97,500 97,500 97,500 487,500 Professional 20,000 20000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Contingency 75,000 75000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30111 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 25-Apr-13 31 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Parks Project: 201302 - Miscellaneous Parks ADA Improvements Description This project will construct ADA improvements at Various City Parks based on the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total 0 General Fund Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 71,429 133,415 204,844 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 71,429 133,415 0 0 0 204,844 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,008 1,882 2,890 Engineering 5,039 9,412 14,451 Construction 50,391 94,120 144,511 Inspection 4,913 9,177 14,090 Professional 5,039 9,412 14,451 Other: Contingency 5,039 9,412 14,451 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 71,429 133,415 0 0 0 204,844 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Categoa Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 24-Jan-12 32 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements Description This project will address the annual traffic signal maintenance needs city-wide, including upgrades to the signal equipment and re -wiring intersections that need it. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235.000 1,175,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Aperopriation 06/30/12 201312014 = 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Engineering 0 Construction 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 1,160,000 Inspection 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235.000 235.000 1,175,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 201612017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 33 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201313 -Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements Description Replacement of HVAC units at several older City owned facilities as part of the City's Preventative Maintenance Plan and Facilities Assessment. Many HVAC units are allover useful life. Newer systems are more energy efficient resulting in energy cost reductions in the General Fund. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O CateQory Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 M 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50.000 50,000 50.000 50,000 250,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 = 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 8,965 Engineering 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 17,931 Construction 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 179,305 Inspection 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 17,482 Professional 717 717 717 717 717 3,586 Other: Contingency 4,546 4,546 4.546 4,546 4,547 22,731 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 50.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50.001 250,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance NO Cate o Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 34 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201401 -Sports Complex ADA Improvement Project iescription his project will construct ADA improvements at the Sports Complex based on the prioritized improvements recommended as part of th ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 201712018 Total General Fund _0_6/30/12 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 161,472 161,472 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 161.472 0 0 0 161,472 tx ense wmounrs Prior Balance A/O Cate o Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 2,278 2,278 Engineering 11,391 11,391 Construction 113,913 113,913 Inspection 11,107 11,107 Professional 11,391 11,391 Other: Contingency 11,391 11,391 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 161.471 0 0 161,471 Onaratina Cnstc Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 35 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations )escription 'his annual project provides for the construction of sidewalks at various locations. The new sidewalk sections are selected fror ie prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New AEeropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance AIO Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 201612017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 011 55,000 55,000 55,000 55.000 55,000 275,000 ense Amounts Administration Engineering Construction Inspection Professional Contingency Other: Expense Amount Total nnPrafinn Cncts Prior ropriation U (lance A/O 06/30/11 2013/2014 2013/2014 777 777 3,880 3,880 38,800 38,800 3,783 3,783 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 0 55,000 55,000 IBM 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total 777 777 777 3,885 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000 3,783 3,783 3,783 18,915 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 0' 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Prior Balance A/O CateLoEy Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 201312014 201612017 201712018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% _ Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 36 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations lescription 'his annual project provides for the construction of handicap access ramps at various locations. The new handicap ramps arl elected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Exoense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 282 282 282 282 282 282 Engineering 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Construction 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 Inspection 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 Professional 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Contingency 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Ooeratina Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 37 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Description The project will slurry seal and reconstruct roadways within the City in accordance with the future recommendations developed by the Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Revenue Amounts New AeproEriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Cateaory Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1.000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.000.000 5,000,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Approeriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 r 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 25,000 25000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Engineering 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Construction 742,500 742500 742,500 742,500 742,500 3,712,500 Inspection 97,500 97500 97,500 97,500 97,500 487,500 Professional 20,000 20000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Contingency 75,000 75000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000.000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.000,000 5,000,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2.t61_ 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 M CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements )escription 'his project will address the annual traffic signal maintenance needs city-wide, including upgrades to the signal equipment and re-wirin itersections that need it. Revenue Amounts New Agpropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06/30112 2013/2014 2014/2015 =201612017 2017/2018 Total General Fund Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 235.000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 Amounts Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 BENZ= 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Engineering 0 Construction 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 1,160,000 Inspection 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 Onpratinn Cnstc Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017I2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 39 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201313 -Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements Description Replacement of HVAC units at several older City owned facilities as part of the City's Preventative Maintenance Plan and Facilities Assessment. Many HVAC units are attover useful life. Newer systems are more energy efficient resulting in energy cost reductions in the General Fund. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance AIO Category Appropriation 06130112 201312014 2014/2015 1W512016i2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Ether: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Expense Amounts Cateqory Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 8,965 Engineering 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 17,931 Construction 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 179,305 Inspection 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 17,482 Professional 717 717 717 717 717 3,586 Other: Contingency 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,547 22,731 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.001 250.000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/0 Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 all CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201501 -YMCA Daycare ADA Improvement Project Description This project will construct ADA improvements at the YMCA Daycare based on the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 100,000 100,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 se Amounts Category Appropriation 06/30112 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,411 1,411 Engineering 7,055 7,05tg Construction 70,547 70,547 Inspection 6,878 6,87E Professional 7,055 7,05,r Other: Contingency 7,055 7,05E Operating Costs Prior Balance AIO Category Appropriation 06/30/12 201312014 2014/2015 2016/2017 201712018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 41 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201502 - City Hall Council Chamber Improvements Description City Council Chambers refurbishment program to include replacing acoustical panels, upgrading lighting, and replacing carpeting and upholstery. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Funds 201,809 201,809 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 201,809 0 0 201,809 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016I2017 201712018 Total Administration 7,237 7,237 Engineering 14,474 14,474 Construction 144,744 144,744 Inspection 14,113 14,113 Professional 2,895 2,895 Other: Contingency 18,346 18,346 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 201,809 0 0 201,809 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2016/2017 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 42 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of sidewalks at various locations. The new sidewalk sections are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 5777777741 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2013/2014 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total Administration 777 777 777 777 777 3,885 Engineering 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Construction 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000 Inspection 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 18,915 Professional 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Contingency 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275.000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2013/2014 2016/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 43 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of handicap access ramps at various locations. The new handicap ramps are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 011 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30111 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 16120 , 2017/2018 Total Administration 282 282 282 282 282 282 Engineering 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Construction 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 Inspection 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 Professional 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Contingency 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 _ 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 E CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Description The project will slurry seal and reconstruct roadways within the City in accordance with the future recommendations developed by the Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Revenue Amounts New Appropriation bX Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 ;; 2017/2018 Total Administration 25,000 25000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Engineering 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Construction 742,500 742500 742,500 742,500 742,500 3,712,500 Inspection 97,500 97500 97,500 97,500 97,500 487,500 Professional 20,000 20000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Contingency 75,000 75000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Cateaory Appropriation 06130/11 2013/2014 201412015 2015/2016 M, , 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 �5perating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 45 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements lescription 'his project will address the annual traffic signal maintenance needs city-wide, including upgrades to the signal equipment and re-wirin itersections that need it. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 201512016 201712018 Total General Fund Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235.000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 tx ense Amounts Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total Administration 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Engineering 0 Construction 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 1,160,000 Inspection 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,176,000 nnam inn rnefe Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201308 - Jefferson Street Interchange Description The project will reconstruct the interchange on Jefferson Street at Interstate 10. The City of Indio is serving as the Lead Agency on behalf of CVAG, the County of Riverside and the City of La Quinta. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 82,000 545,000 627,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 82,000 545,000 627,000 Expense Amounts Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 82,000 545,000 627,000 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 82,000 545,000 627,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/201611 r2, 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete The Jefferson Street Interchange Improvements are currently estimated to cost $55,000,000. CVAG has committed to funding 75% of this amount. The Cities of La Quinta, Indio, and the County of Riverside are responsible for the remaining 25% (Local Share) currently estimated at $13,750,000. The 25% Local Share is distributed 0.50% to the County of Riverside, Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 24-Jan-12 47 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201313 -Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements )ascription teplacement of HVAC units at several older City owned facilities as part of the City's Preventative Maintenance Plan and Facilities kssessment. Many HVAC units are attover useful life. Newer systems are more energy efficient resulting in energy cost reductions in the 3eneral Fund. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation bX Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Cate o Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Exoense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30112 2013/2014 2014I2015 201512016 JI 2 201712018 Total Administration 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 8,965 Engineering 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 17,931 Construction 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 179,305 Inspection 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 17,482 Professional 717 717 717 717 717 3,586 Other: Contingency 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,547 22,731 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,001 250,000 Oneratina Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 oAt7�2017/2018 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 24-Jan-12 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199702 - Sidewalks - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of sidewalks at various locations. The new sidewalk sections are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017M Total General Fund 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0111 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Approeriation 06130/11 2013/2014 2013/2014 2016/2016 2016/2017 Total Administration 777 777 777 777 777 3,885 Engineering 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Construction 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000 Inspection 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 3,783 18,915 Professional 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Contingency 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 3,880 19,400 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 275,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 201312014 2013/2014 2015/2016 2016/2017 �._ Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% r•.. M. Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 199703 - Handicap Access Ramp - Various Locations Description This annual project provides for the construction of handicap access ramps at various locations. The new handicap ramps are selected from the prioritized improvements recommended as part of the ADA Transition Plan Report Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 20116/201117�M Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 11 Revenue Amount Total 0 D 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017M Total Administration 282 282 282 282 282 282 Engineering 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Construction 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 14,109 Inspection 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 1,376 Professional 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Contingency 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/20175WAISM Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 50 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: 201207 - Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements Description The project will slurry seal and reconstruct roadways within the City in accordance with the future recommendations developed by the Pavement Management Plan (PMP). Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O 11111111VTotal Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 Total Administration 25,000 25000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Engineering 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 Construction 742,500 742500 742,500 742,500 742,500 3,712,500 Inspection 97,500 97500 97,500 97,500 97,500 487,500 Professional 20,000 20000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Contingency 75,000 75000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 1,000,000 1,000.000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/11 2013/2014 201412015 2015/2016 2016/2017 t3 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 25-Apr-13 51 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201307 - Citywide Traffic Signal Maintenance Improvements Description This project will address the annual traffic signal maintenance needs city-wide, including upgrades to the signal equipment and re -wiring intersections that need it. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30112 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 M Total General Fund Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/O Appropriation 06/30112 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 M Total Administration 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Engineering 0 Construction 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 232,000 1,160,000 Inspection 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 1,175,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 Total I General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 24-Jan-12 52 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: 201308 - Jefferson Street Interchange Description The project will reconstruct the interchange on Jefferson Street at Interstate 10. The City of Indio is serving as the Lead Agency on behalf of CVAG, the County of Riverside and the City of La Quinta. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 82,000 545,000 627,000 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 82,000 545,000 627,000 Expense Amounts Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 201412015 2016/2016 2016/2017 M Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 82,000 545,000 627,000 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 82,000 545,000 627,000 Operating Costs Prior Balance A/O Category Appropriation 06/30/12 201312014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 WOM0,34 Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete The Jefferson Street Interchange Improvements are currently estimated to cost $55,000,000, CVAG has committed to funding 75% of this amount. The Cities of La Quinta, Indio, and the County of Riverside are responsible for the remaining 25% (Local Share) currently estimated at $13,750,000. The 25% Local Share is distributed 0.50% to the County of Riverside, Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 53 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facilities Project: 201313 -Citywide Preventative Maintenance Plan Improvements Description Replacement of HVAC units at several older City owned facilities as part of the City's Preventative Maintenance Plan and Facilities Assessment, Many HVAC units are attover useful life. Newer systems are more energy efficient resulting in energy cost reductions in the General Fund. Revenue Amounts New Appropriation by Fiscal Year Prior Balance A/0 CateporL Appropriation 06130/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 J0FMZ0,J= Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure Equipment Replacement Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby Funds 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Expense Amounts Category Prior Balance A/0 Appyopriation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 Z Total Administration 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 1,793 8,965 Engineering 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 3,586 17,931 Construction 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 35,861 179,305 Inspection 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 3,496 17,482 Professional 717 717 717 717 717 3,586 Other: Contingency 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,546 4,547 22,731 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,001 250,000 Overatinq Costs Prior Balance A/O CateQory App ro riation 06/30/12 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 R_:, Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Fixing ADA non -compliant improvements is not expected to increase operating costs over what is existing. _ ] Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD01 - Avenue 50 Bridge Improvement Spanning the Evacuation Channel Description Design and construct a new 4 lane bridge on Avenue 50 spanning the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Kevenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 1,347,208 1,347,208 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 2,412,792 2,412,792 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,760,000 0 3,760,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 94,000 94,000 Engineering 376,000 376,000 Construction 2,622,600 2,622,600 Inspection 291,400 291,400 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 376,000 376,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,760,000 0 3,760,000 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 55 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD02 - Washington Street Bridge Railing (Replacement) lescription 'repare the Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) and replace the existing bridge railing on Washington Street at thl Vhitewater River with the La Quinta decorative bridge railing. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 535,177 535,177 Other: City of Indian Wells 535,178 535,178 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,070,355 0 1,070,355 Categog To Be Determined Total Administration 39,000 39,000 Engineering 78,000 78,000 Construction 780,000 780,000 Inspection 76,050 76,050 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 97,305 97,305 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 0 0 0 1,070,355 0 1,070.355 Oneratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 56 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD03 - Fred Waring Drive (Adams Street to Port Maria Road) Description The proposed improvements include the installation of half a median island and median island landscape and irrigation, and low level lighting between Adams St. and Port Maria Road Revenue Amounts Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 2,036,513 2,036,513 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 ether: Developer Bonds 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,036,513 0 2.036,513 Exuense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 101,826 101,826 Engineering 203,651 203,651 Construction 1,328,825 1,328,825 Inspection 198,560 198,560 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 203,651 203,651 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,036,513 0 2,036,513 Onarafinn Costs Categog To B_ a Determined Total General Fund 5,000 5,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,000 0 5,000 Additional Comments: Operating costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Project Costs were updated following the completion of the widening improvements between Washington Street and Adams Street. The project costs will updated in the DIF during the next DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 57 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD04 - Madison Street (Avenue 52 to Avenue 54) iescription 'he proposed improvements include the installation of median island landscape and irrigation between Avenue 52 and Avenu, 4. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 1.162,354 1,162,354 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,162,354 0 1,162.354 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 43,130 43,130 Engineering 86,260 86,260 Construction 862,600 862,600 Inspection 84,104 84,104 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 86,260 86.260 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,162,354 0 1,162,354 Oneratinn Cncfs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 23,760 23,760 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 23,760 0 23,760 Additional Comments: Operating costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented in the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. This improvement has a pending Developer Reimbursement Agreement (DRA) with the Madison Club, in the amount of $2,030,887. As of March 2009, two travel lanes and median curb have been constructed. The median landscape and irrigation improvements are pending. The costs presented above have been adjusted to reflect the cost of the median landscape and irrigation improvements only. DRA improvements are tracked as separate ADD projects. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD05 - Madison Street (Avenue 60 to Avenue 62) Description The proposed improvements include the installation of two lanes and paved painted median between Avenue 60 and Avenue 62. The improvements also include 1,350 LF of full width widening on the east side adjacent to Trilogy. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 3,108,879 3,108,879 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,108,879 0 3,108,879 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 110,117 110,117 Engineering 220,234 220,234 Construction 2,202, 341 2,202,341 Inspection 170,681 170,681 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 405,506 405,506 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 0 0 0 3,108,879 0 3.108,879 nnPratinn Cnstc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project costs are updated as presented in the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. This project has a pending Developer Reimbursement Agreement (DRA) with Travertine Development, in the amount of $1,563,733. The DRA improvements have not been constructed. Printed: 23-Apr-13 M01 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: AD06 - Miles Avenue Median Curb and Median Island Landscaping (Seeley - Dune Palms) Description Construct median island curb and install landscaping, irrigation and lighting from Seeley Avenue to Dune Palms Road (1.65 miles) Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 922.062 922,062 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Developer Bonds Median Curb 315,818 315,818 Other: TBD Landscape 0 Other: TBD Median Curb 0, Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,237,880 0 1,237,8801 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 45,838 45,838 Engineering 91,678 91,678 Construction 916,779 916,779 Inspection 71,050 71,050 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 112,535 112,535 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,237,880 0 1.237,880 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 39,000 39,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 39,000 0 39,000 Additional Comments: Developer Bonds available in the amount of $315,818. Operating costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Project costs are updated as presented in the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Drainage Improvement Project: AD07 - Phase 3 Washington Street Drainage Improvements (St. Francis of Assisi Parkway Median) )escription the project will remove and replace the frontage road adjacent to the St. Francis of Assisi Church with a retention basin. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Developer Bonds 0 Other: 1,131, 997 1,131,997 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1.131,997 0 1.131.991 Exoense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 41,100 41,100 Engineering 82,200 82,200 Construction 822,000 822,000 Inspection 80,145 80,145 Professional 0 Contingency 106,552 106,552 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,131,997 0 1,131,997 OnAratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The project will result in the addition of 3.5 acre-feet of storm water capacity. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD08 - Avenue 50 (Washington Street to Madison Street) )escriotion -he proposed improvements include the installation of median island, median island landscape, irrigation and electrical, fron Vashington St. to Jefferson St.; and the installation of half a median island, median island landscape, irrigation and electrical an( he adjustment of the centerline profile to implement urban drainage concept for future widening of the south side, from Jeffersoi it. to Madison St. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 1,222.008 1,222,008 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Developer Bonds 52,100 52,100 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,274,108 0 1,274,108 Expense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 47,275 47,275 Engineering 94,550 94.550 Construction 945,500 945,500 Inspection 92,186 92,186 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 94,597 94,597 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,274,108 0 1,274,108 O Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 30,000 30,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Additional Comments: 1. The proposed median improvements are not included between the La Quinta Evacuation Channel and Park St. 2. The project also includes the construction of a new outside lane adjacent to Polo Estates. 3. Park Avenue to Orchard - Developer bonds are available for the south side. 4. Operating costs for future median island landscape and lighting are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. 5. Project costs have been reduced to reflect TD Desert Tract 25429 Developer Reimbursement Agreement $186,900 DIF and $45,000 Developer Bonds; and to reflect Toll Brothers Reimbursement Agreement $ 627,972. Developer Reimbursement Agreements are tracked as separate Additional Projects. 6. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented in the September 16, 2008 DIF. 62 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD09 - Avenue 52 Street Improvements Description The proposed improvements include the installation of median island, median island landscape, irrigation and electrical, and the adjustment of the centerline profile to implement urban drainage standards for the future widening of the north and south sides, from Jefferson St. to Madison; and the installation of half a median island, median island landscape, irrigation and electrical, and the adjustment of the centerline profile to implement urban drainage standards for future widening of the south side, from Madison Street to 1/2 mile east of Madison Street. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 2,648,311 2,648,311 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,648,311 0 2,648,311 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 98,268 98,268 Engineering 196,535 196,535 Construction 1,965,350 1,965,350 Inspection 191,622 191,622 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 196,537 196,537 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,648,311 0 2,648,311 Onaratina Casts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 5,900 5,900 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,900 0 5,900 Additional Comments: Operating costs for future maintenance of the median island landscape and lighting improvements are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 2008 DIF update. Project costs have been reduced to reflect the improvements constructed by the Madison Club Tract 33076 ($669,920),by the Greystone Group Tract 33220 ($183,340), and by the ND La Quinta Partners Tract 29894 ($1,344,690). In addition, the Toll Brothers Tract 30357 have an approved Developer Reimbursement Agreement (DRA), in the amount of ($112,723), for improvements that have not been constructed as of March 2009. Developer Reimbursements Agreements (DRA) are tracked as separate Additional Projects. Printed: 23-Apr-13 63 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD10 - Avenue 58 Street Improvements (PGA West south to Madison St.) Description This project proposes to realign and construct Avenue 58 from PGA West south to Madison Street. The project was formerly known as the Jefferson Street extension. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 5,569,743 5,569,743 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Developer Contributions/Bonds 1,365,268 1,365,268 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 6,935,011 0 6,935,011 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 256,804 256,804 Engineering 513,609 513,609 Construction 5,136,094 5,136,094 Inspection 398,048 398,048 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 630,456 630,456 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 6,935,011 0 6,935,011 Oneratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Coral Canyon LLC Tract 33444 has a pending Developer Reimbursement Agreement (DRA) which will affect this project. The pending agreement anticipates the developer will ultimately be reimbursed from both the Transportation DIF and from prior developers. The City has also amended the street typical section for this improvement. The pending developer agreeement and the street section amendment will be addressed and incorporated into the next DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD11 - Avenue 62 Street Improvements (Monroe to Madison St.) )escription 'his project proposes to widen Avenue 62 from 2 to 4 lanes between Monroe Street and Madison Street. The improvement iclude the crossing over the CVWD Dike. Revenue Amounts Gate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 5,952,644 5,952,644 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: Developer Contribution 2,299,384 2,299,384 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 8,252,028 0 8,252,028 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 330,015 330,015 Engineering 660,030 660,030 Construction 6,600,302 6,600,302 Inspection 511,523 511,523 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 150,158 150,158 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 8,252,028 0 8,252,028 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 165, 2008 DIF Update. The project funding includes a commitment from Shea Homes at Trilogy in the amount of $2,050,000 and other adjacent developers in the amount of $249,384. Printed: 23-Apr-13 65 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD12 - Madison Street Median Island Landscape Rehabilitation (Avenue 54 to Avenue 56) )escription "he proposed improvements include the preparation of the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) tc ehabilitate the landscaping and irrigation within the median islands on Madison Street from Avenue 54 to Avenue 56, Tht nedian islands are 18 feet wide and approximately 5,280 feet long. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 1,777,370 1,777,370 RDA PA #2 Low/Mod 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,777,370 0 1,777,370 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 48,000 48,000 Engineering 120,000 120,000 Construction 1,200,000 1,200,000 Inspection 117,000 117,000 Professional 120,000 120,000 Other: Contingency 172,370 172,370 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,777,370 0 1,777,370 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 20,000 20,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 20,000 Additional Comments: Operating costs for future maintenance of the parkways is calculated at $.025 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD13 - Avenida Bermudas Storm Drain Improvements )escription the project will upgrade the drainage capability at the intersection of Avenida Bermudas and Calle Tampico. The mprovements include the construction of a Maxwell IV drywell, and the installation of a 30" RCP storm drain to carry storrr eater from the southwest corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas to the existing storm drain near the KSL parking lot. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 317,888 317,888 RDA PA #2 Low/Mod 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 317,888 0 317,888 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 10,210 10,210 Engineering 20,420 20,420 Construction 204,200 204,200 Inspection 19,910 19,910 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 63,148 63,148 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 317,888 0 317,888 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 67 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD14 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Washington Street Intersection) >escription 'he proposed improvements will enhance the public right of way at the intersection of Washington Street and Highway 111 i accordance with the recommendations presented within the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines, date anuary 20, 2011. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 1,005,586 1,005,586 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,005,586 0 1.005,586 Cate o To Be Determined Total Administration 36,640 36,640 Engineering 73,280 73,280 Construction 732,800 732,800 Inspection 71,448 71,448 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 91,418 91,418 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,005,586 0 1,005,586 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 4,150 4,150 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 4,150 0 4,150 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 •: CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD15 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Adams Street Intersection) Description The proposed improvements will enhance the public right of way at the intersection of Adams Street and Highway 111 in accordance with the recommendations presented within the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines, dated January 20, 2011, Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 944,602 944,602 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 944,602 0 944,602 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 34,418 34,418 Engineering 68,836 68,836 Construction 688,360 688,360 Inspection 67,115 67,115 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 85,873 85,873 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 944,602 0 944,602 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,500 3,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 0 3,500 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 •• CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD16 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Dune Palms Road Intersection) lescription 'he proposed improvements will enhance the public right of way at the intersection of Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 i ccordance with the recommendations presented within the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines, dated Januar 0, 2011. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 884,827 884,827 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 884,827 0 884,827 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 32,240 32,240 Engineering 64,480 64,480 Construction 644,800 644,800 Inspection 62,868 62,868 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 80,439 80,439 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 884,827 0 884,827 r1nar2finn Cnc4c Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,300 3,300 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,300 0 3,300 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 we, CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD17 - Highway 111 Landscape Enhancements (Medians West City Limit to Adams Street) Description The proposed improvements will enhance the median island landscape, irrigation and low level lighting in accordance with the recommendations presented within the Highway 111 Corridor Landscape Design Guidelines, dated January 20, 2011. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 880,000 880,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 880,000 0 880,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 32,030 32,030 Engineering 64,062 64,062 Construction 640,618 640,618 Inspection 62,461 62,461 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 80,829 80,829 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 880,000 0 880,000 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,300 3,300 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,300 0 3,300 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 71 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD18 - Miles Avenue Reconstruction (Adams Street to Dune Palms Road) iescription 'he project will reconstruct the eastbound and westbound number 1 (center) lanes from Adams Street to Dune Palms Road. Th nprovements include new AC pavement and base material, striping, crack seal, and slurry seal as needed. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 573,221 573,221 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 573.221 0 573,221 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 20,923 20,923 Engineering 41,845 41,845 Construction 418,451 418,451 Inspection 40,799 40,799 Professional 20,923 20,923 Other: Contingency 30,280 30,280 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 573,221 0 573,221 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 72 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD19 - Miles Avenue and Washington Street Intersection Improvements Description This project will widen Washington Street to provide southbound dual left -turn lanes on Washington Street north of Miles Avenue, widen Miles Avenue to provide a separate westbound right -turn lane and right -turn overlap phase at Washington Street and install interconnnect on Washington Street from Miles Avenue to Channel Drive to tie the signals at Miles Avenue and Washigton Street, Miles Avenue and Seeley Drive, Fred Waring Drive and Palm Royale to the La Quinta Aries System. These signals are currently connected to the Palm Desert System. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 597,970 597,970 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 597,970 0 597,970 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 19,638 19,638 Engineering 39,276 39,276 Construction 392,765 392,765 Inspection 38,295 38,295 Professional 30,000 30,000 Other: Contingency 77,996 77,996 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 597,970 0 597,970 OnFaratina Cnsts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 73 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD20 - Avenue 50 and Washington Street Intersection Improvements Description This project will remove the crosswalks on the north and west sides of the intersection to eliminate unsafe pedestrian movements. The crosswalk striping will be removed and barriers will be placed on the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection to prevent pedestrian crossings. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 59,643 59,643 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 59,643 0 59,643 Cate o To Be Determined Total Administration 2,150 2,150 Engineering 6,000 6,000 Construction 43,000 43,000 Inspection 4,193 4,193 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 4,300 4,300 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 59,643 0 59,643 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot. Printed: 23-Apr-13 74 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: AD21 - Fred Waring Drive Reconstruction (Washington Street to Adams Street) Description The project will reconstruct the eastbound and westbound number 1 (center) lanes from Palm Royale to Adams Street and all eastbound lanes from Washington Street to Palm Royale. The improvements include new AC pavement and base material, striping, crack seal, and slurry seal as needed. Revenue Amounts General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: To Be Determined 2,012,779 2,012,779 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,012,779 0 2.012,779 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 70,150 70,150 Engineering 140,300 140,300 Construction 1,403,000 1,403,000 Inspection 136,793 136,793 Professional 70,150 70,150 Other: Contingency 192,386 192,386 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,012,779 0 2,012,779 Onaratinn Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete Operating Costs are calculated at $0.25 per square foot Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 75 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: AD22 - Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street Roundabout Improvements �escnpbon -his project will upgrade the existing roundabout at Jefferson Street and Avenue 52 to function as a two-lane modern roundabout Revenue Amounts General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: To Be Determined 1,000,000 1,000.000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 25000 25,000 Engineering 40000 40,000 Construction 742500 742,500 Inspection 97500 97,500 Professional 20000 20,000 Other: Contingency 75000 75,000 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 ODeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year. Printed: 24-Jan-12 76 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvements Project: AD23 - Roadrunner Street and Dune Palms Road Traffic Circle Iescrption 'his project will study the feasibilty of placing a roundabout at the intersection of Roadrunner and Westward Ho. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Measure A 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Quimby 0 Other: To Be Determined 600,000 600,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 600,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 18,628 18,628 Engineering 44,000 44,000 Construction 440,000 440,000 Inspection 42,900 42.900 Professional 11,000 11.000 Other: Contingency 43,472 43,472 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 600,000 Onaratinn Cnctc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additions Comments: Project Status: Percent Complete It is not anticipated that these improvements will increase the operating costs over what is existing Shading represents the current Fiscal Year, Printed: 24-Jan-12 77 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD24- New Traffic Signal (Caleo Bay & Avenue 47) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 W CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD25 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street @ Lake La Quinta Drive) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. snue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 215,000 215.000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: Developer Contribution 215,000 215,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430.000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 79 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD26 - New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms Road @ Corporate Center Drive) )escription >repare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 nnaratinn CnOn Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0' 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 W CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD27 - New Traffic Signal (Eisenhower Drive @ Montezuma) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430.000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD28 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 50) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 107,500 107,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 322,500 322,500 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,750 3,750 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,750 0 3,750 Additional Comments: The City of Indio owns three corners or 75% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated as presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 M CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD29 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 52) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 322,500 322,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 107.500 107,500 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 11,250 11,250 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 11,250 Additional Comments: City of Indio owns one corner or 25% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD30 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 54) )escription )esign and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430.000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratinn Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 0 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD31 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Avenue 54) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430.000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321.425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 nnaratinn Cnsta Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to refect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD32 - New Traffic Signal (Madison @ Avenue 58) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total. 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to refect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 M. CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD33 - New Traffic Signal (Madison Street @ Avenue 60) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430,000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430.000 Cate o To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex ease Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Ooeratina Costs Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to refect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 a CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD34 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 52) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. inue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 107,500 107,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: City of Indio 322,500 322,500 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430.000 0 430.000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321.425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430.000 0 430.000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,750 3,750 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3.750 0 3,750 Additional Comments: City of Indio owns three corners or 75% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to refect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 :: CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD35 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 54) fescription Irepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 215,000 215,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 215,000 215,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Categor y To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: County of Riverside owns two corners or 50% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to refect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD36 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Airport Blvd.) iescription 'repare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 215,000 215.000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 215,000 215,000 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Categog To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Onaratinn Cnatsa Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: County of Riverside owns two corners or 50% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 M CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD37- New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 58) description 3repare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 215,000 215,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 215,000 215.000 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430.000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7.500 Additional Comments: County of Riverside owns two corners or 50% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 91 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD38 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 60) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 430.000 430,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21.500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43.000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Operating Costs Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000 Additional Comments: Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 F01K CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD39 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 61) Tescription 'repare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 322,500 322,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 107.500 107,500 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33.325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430.000 0 430,000 Onaratinn Cnc}c Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 11,250 11,250 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 11,250 0 11,250 Additional Comments: County of Riverside owns one corner or 25% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 93 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD40 - New Traffic Signal (Monroe Street @ Avenue 62) Description Prepare traffic signal warrant analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 107,500 107,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: County of Riverside 322,500 322,500 Other: To Be Determined 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430.000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,750 3,750 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,750 0 3,750 Additional Comments: County of Riverside owns three corners or 75% of the proposed signal. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD41 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Dunbar) Description Prepare Signal Warrant Analysis, design and construct new traffic signal. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0, Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 107,500 107,500i DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 Other: County of Riverside 107,500 107,500 Other: City of Indio 107,500 107,500 Other: Developer Contribution 107,500 107.5001 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 3,750 3,750 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,750 0 3,750 Additional Comments: The project is shared with the City of Indio (25%) and the County of Riverside (25%). The remaining 25% will be contributed by the adjacent developer. Project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 95 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD42 - New Traffic Signal (Washington Street at Via Sevilla) Description Prepare Signal Warrant Analysis and construct traffic signal at intersection of Washington Street and Villa Sevilla. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 215,000 215,000 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: Indian Wells 215,000 215,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430.000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: The project is shared with the City of Indian Wells (50%). Project costs have been updated as presented within the September 16, 2009 Transportation DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD43 - New Traffic Signal (Avenue 50 @ Orchard) iescription 'repare Signal Warrant Analysis and construct traffic signal at intersection of Avenue 50 @ Orchard. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 298,750 298,750 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: developer contribution 131,250 131,250 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10.750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Onaratinn Cnsts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 97 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD44 - New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street @ Avenue 53) Description Prepare Signal Warrant Analysis and construct traffic signal at intersection of Jefferson Street @ Avenue 53. Revenue Amounts Category_ To Be Determined Total _ _ General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 342,500 342,500 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: DeveioperContribution 87,500 87,500i Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,OOO1 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 21,500 21,500 Engineering 43,000 43,000 Construction 321,425 321,425 Inspection 33,325 33,325 Professional 10,750 10,750 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 430,000 0 430,000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 M CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD45 - Traffic Signal Citywide Central Control Unit Description Design and install a Citywide Central Control Unit that will enable all City owned traffic signals to be controlled from the Civic Center. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 394,130 394,130 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: TBD 705,870 705,870 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1.100,000 0 1,100,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 55,000 55,000 Engineering 110,000 110,000 Construction 935,000 935,000 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 1,100,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Project costs were updated as presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF Update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD46 - Sound Attenuation Wall (E. Madison at Trilogy) Description Design and construct sound attenuation wall. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 192,115 192,115 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 192,115 0 192,115 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 7.000 7,000 Engineering 14,000 14.000 Construction 140,000 140,000 Inspection 13,650 13,650 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 17,465 17,465 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 192,115 0 192,115 Onaratinn Cnctc Category _ To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The costs have been updated as presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 iteIf, CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD47 - City Hall Solar Panels Iescription 'he proposed improvements include the installation of photo voltaic solar panels on the parking structures at the La Quinta City Hall. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DiF - Fire 0 Other: To be Determined 1.000.000 1,000,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1.000.000 0 1,000,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 50,000 50,000 Construction 950,000 950,000 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other; Contingency 0 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Oneratino Costs Categog To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-1.3 101 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD48- Library/Senior Center Solar Panels Description The proposed improvements include the installation of photo voltaic solar panels on the parking structures at the La Quinta Library and Senior Center. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To be Determined 1,000,000 1,000,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1.000,000 Cate a To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 50,000 50.000 Construction 950,000 950,000 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 0 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 Operating Costs Categog To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 102 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD49 - Corporate Yard - Phases II and III lescription 'hase II of the Corporate Yard includes the construction of the Administrative Offices and Crew Spaces. Phase III includes th onstruction of Maintenance Shops and Departmental Storage Facilities. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Phase II Phase III General Fund 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 1,002,498 1,933,792 2,936,290 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 1,897,276 1,185,228 3.082,504 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 2.899,774 3,119,020 0 6,018.794 Category To Be Determined Total Phase II Phase III Administration 112,500 123,550 236,050 Engineering 59,711 59,711 Construction 2,250,000 2,471,000 4.721,000 Inspection 219,375 240,923 460,298 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 258,188 283,547 541,735 Other: 0 Ex enseAmountTotal 0 0 0 0 2,899,774 3,119,020 0 6,018,794 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The costs presented have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 103 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD50 - Southeast Area Fire Station lescription nprovements include site acquisition, design and construction of new fire station in southeast area of La Quinta. Revenue Amounts Cate o _ _ To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 'DIF - Fire 2,198,500 2,198,500 Other: County of Riverside 2,198.500 2,198,500 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 4,397.000 0 4.397,000 CategoryCatogary To Be Determined Total Administration 163,154 163,154 Engineering 326,308 326,308 Construction 3,263,080 3.263,080 Inspection 318,150 318,150 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 326,308 326.308 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 4,397,000 0 4,397,000 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The project costs have been updated to reflect the costs presented within the September 16, 2008 DIF update. Printed: 23-Apr-13 104 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD51 - Black Box Theater Description The proposed improvements include the construction of a 7,500 square foot City owned theater within the Village area. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 3,000,000 3,000,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 0 3.000,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 60,000 60,000 Engineering 300,000 300,000 Construction 2,047,500 2,047,500 Inspection 292,500 292,500 Professional 60,000 60,000 Other: Contingency 240,000 240,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 Operatinq Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Construction of the future theater facility is anticipated in the year 2020. Operating costs will be calculated when specific information is available. Printed: 23-Apr-13 105 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD52 - SilverRock Resort Irrigation and Pump Station Replacement )escription 'he project will reconstruct the irrigation system and pump station at the SilverRock Resort Golf Course. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 2,281,500 2,281.500 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,281,500 0 2,281,500 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 45,630 45,630 Engineering 228,150 228,150 Construction 1,557,124 1,557,124 Inspection 222,446 222,446 Professional 45,630 45,630 Other: Contingency 182,520 182,520 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,281,500 0 2,281,500 Ooeratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The useful life of the municipal golf course irrigation system and pump station is estimated at 35 to 30 years. This future improvement will be implemented at the time the existing facilities begin to fail due to age. Printed: 23-Apr-13 `jet: CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD53 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Infrastructure Description The project includes the preparation of the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and the construction of the SilverRock Resort Phase II Infrastructure Improvements. Improvements include, but may not be limited to, on site sewer, water, dry utilities, CVWD irrigation lines, golf cart bridges, CVWD well site land acquisition and well site, and the payment of fees and/or permits. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 22,223,141 22,223.141 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 22.223,141 0 22,223,141 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 18.278,534 18,278,534 Inspection 1,722,293 1,722,293 Professional 0 0 Other: FF&E/Owner Items 0 Contingency 2,222,314 2,222.314 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 22,223.141 0 22,223,141 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 550,000 550,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 0 550,000 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 107 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD54 - SilverRock Resort Clubhouse - Construction Phase )escription -he project includes the preparation of the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and the construction of the SilverRocl tesort Clubhouse. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 25,412,010 25,412,010 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 25,412,010 0 25,412,010 CateRor y To Be Determined Total Administration 508,240 508,240 Engineering 1,836,000 1,836,000 Construction 18,911,699 18,911,699 Inspection 775,000 775,000 Professional 0 0 Other: FF&E/Owner Items 1,725,500 1,725,500 Contin enc 1,655.571 1,655,571 Ex erase Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 25,412.010 0 25.412,010 Onwrnfinn r:ncfc Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 550,000 550,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 550.000 0 550.000 Additional Comments: The annual operating costs of the permanent clubhouse were extracted from the "Evaluation of SilverRock Resort Golf Course Capital Improvement Options" prepared by Economics Research Associates (ERA), dated January 18, 2005. Printed: 23-Apr-13 W CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD55 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Golf Course Description The project includes the preparation of the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and the construction of the second 18 hole municipal golf course at the SilverRock Resort. Revenue Amounts Categog To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 21,060,000 21.060,000 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 21,060,000 0 21.060,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 421,200 421,200 Engineering 2,106,000 2,106,000 Construction 15,589,665 15,589,665 Inspection 1,468,935 1,468,935 Professional 0 0 Contin enc 1,474,200 1.474,200 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 21,060,000 0 21,060,000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 1,550,000 1,550,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,550,000 0 1,550,000 Additional Comments: The annual operating costs of the 2nd golf course were extracted from the "Evaluation of SilverRock Resort Golf Course Capital Improvement Options" prepared by Economics Research Associates (ERA), dated January 18, 2005. Printed: 23-Apr-13 109 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD56 - SilverRock Resort Phase II Entry Feature/Roads Description The project includes the preparation of the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and the construction of the SilverRock Resort Phase II Entrance Feature and Road Improvements Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 5,594,224 5.594,224 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,594,224 0 5,594,224 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 71,800 71,800 Engineering 351,000 351,000 Construction 4,289,739 4,289,739 Inspection 322,262 322,262 Professional 0 0 ,Contingency 559,423 559,423 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,594,224 0 5.594,224 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 1,550,000 1,550,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,550,000 0 1,550,000 Additional Comments: The annual operating costs of the 2nd golf course were extracted from the "Evaluation of SilverRock Resort Golf Course Capital Improvement Options" prepared by Economics Research Associates (ERA), dated January 18, 2005. Printed: 23-Apr-13 110 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Park Improvements Project: AD57 - New Community Sports Park Descri tion Prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and construct a 40 acre Community Park as defined within the City General Plan. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Quimby 385,376 385,376 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 7,130,537 7,130,537 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 12,484,087 12,484,087 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,000,000 0 20,000,000 rx ense Hmounxs Category To Be Determined Total Administration 200,000 200,000 Engineering 750,000 750,000 Construction 16,725,000 16,725,000 Inspection 400,000 400,000 Professional 125,000 125,000 Other: Contingency 1,800,000 1,800,000 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,000,000 0 20,000.000 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 100,000 100,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 111 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Park Improvements Project: AD58 - SilverRock Resort Passive Park Description Prepare the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate (PS&E) and construct a 40 acre passive park at the SilverRock Resort. The Dark will be located at the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52. Revenue Amounts Categog To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Quimby 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 10,000,000 10,000,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Exuense Amounts CategoEy To Be Determined Total Administration 100,000 100,000 Engineering 750,000 750,000 Construction 7,725,000 7,725,000 Inspection 400,000 400,000 Professional 125,000 125,000 Other: Contingency 900,000 900,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Onaratino Costs CategoTo Be Determined Total General Fund 75,000 75,000 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 112 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Public Facility Project: AD59 - Sports Complex Field Improvements Description The proposed improvements include upgraded baseball/softball fields and multi -purpose fields Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 DIF - Fire 0 Other: To Be Determined 5,551,125 5,551,125 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,551,125 0 5,551,125 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 111,023 111,023 Engineering 555,113 555,113 Construction 3,677,620 3,677,620 Inspection 541,235 541,235 Professional 111,023 111,023 Other: Contingency 555,113 555,113 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 5,551,125 0 5,551,125 Operatinq Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: The future upgrade of the field lighting may result in cost savings as a result of the installation of a more energy efficient system. Operating costs will be calculated when project specific information is available. Printed: 23-Apr-13 113 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD60 - 5 Bus Shelters Description Construction of 5 non -advertising bus shelters on Highway 111. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 625,000 625,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 625,000 0 625,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 12,500 12,500 Engineering 62,500 62,500 Construction 420,313 420,313 Inspection 60,938 60,938 Professional 18,750 18,750 Other: Contingency 50,000 50,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 625,000 0 625.000 Oneratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 2,500 2,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,500 0 2,500 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 114 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD61 - Village Area Electric Vehicle Charging Station fescription 'he proposed improvements include the installation of 5 electric vehicle charging stations within the Village parking lot. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To Be Determined 205,838 205,838 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 205,838 0 205,838 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 4,117 4,117 Engineering 15,000 15,000 Construction 150,000 150,000 Inspection 14,625 14,625 Professional 7,500 7,500 Other: Contingency 14,596 14,596 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 205,838 0 205,838 Onaratinn Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 115 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Street Improvement Project: AD62 - Phase I (Part 2) Golf Cart Routes )escription 'he proposed improvements include the installation Golf Cart travel lanes on various streets within the City. Revenue Amounts General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 680,738 680,738 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 680,738 0 680,738 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 25,000 25,000 Engineering 50,519 50,519 Construction 505,186 505,186 Inspection 49,256 49,256 Professional 25,259 25,259 Other: Contingency 25,519 25,519 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 680,738 0 680,738 oneratinn Cnsts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 116 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD63 - Whitewater Channel Regional Bike Trial lescription ,00perate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and adjacent Cities to develop a Regional Bike Trail on thi ;outh side of the Whitewater River the length of the City's east/west boundaries. Revenue Amounts Categog To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 2,290,750 2,290,750 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2,290,750 0 2,290,750 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 85,000 85,000 Engineering 170,000 170,000 Construction 1,700,000 1,700,000 Inspection 165,750 165,750 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 170,000 170,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 2.290,750 0 2,290,750 Onpratinn Cnnfn Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 117 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD64 - Calle Estado/La Fonda Mid Block Crossing Description The proposed improvements will install a mid -block pedestrian crossing between Calle Estado and La Fonda. Improvements include decorative interlocking pavers, landscape and irrigation, and site furnishings. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 115,271 115,271 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 115,271 0 115,271 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 5,000 5,000 Engineering 8,537 8,537 Construction 85,370 85,370 Inspection 6,616 6,616 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 9,748 9,748 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 115,271 0 115,271 Operating Costs Cateaory To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: This project was originally programmed to receive funding during Fiscal Year 2007/2008. The project was removed from the capital budget in Fiscal Year 2009/2010 due to unresolvable right of way issues. Printed: 23-Apr-13 iS&I CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD65 - Village Area Parking Structure Description The proposed improvement will install a 300 space parking structure within the Village area. Revenue Amounts General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 7,500,000 7,500,000 Other: 0 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 150,000 150.000 Engineering 750,000 750,000 Construction 5,043,750 5,043,750 Inspection 731,250 731,250 Professional 225.000 225.000 Other: Contingency 600,000 600=0 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 7.500.000 0 7,500,000 Operating Costs Cateciory To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Operating costs are unknown at this time. Printed: 23-Apr-13 119 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD66 - Calle Tampico Mid Block Crossing )escription the proposed improvements will install a mid -block pedestrian crossing on Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Avenida 3ermudas. Improvements will include a flashing signal type crossing. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 215,000 215,000 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 215.000 0 215,000 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 4,500 4,500 Engineering 15,491 15,491 Construction 154,906 154,906 Inspection 15,103 15,103 Professional 3,500 3,500 Other: Contingency 21,500 21,500 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 215,000 0 215,000 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 7,500 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 120 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD67 - Calle Tampico Class II Bike Trail (Washington to Calle Rondo) Description :,onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Calle Rondo Revenue Amounts Cateqory To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 20,213 20,213 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,213 0 20,213 Categog To Be Determined Total Administration 750 750 Engineering 1,500 1,500 Construction 15,000 15,000 Inspection 1,463 1,463 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 1,500 1,500 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,213 0 20,213 Oueratino Costs CateUory To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 121 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD68 - Avenue 50 Class II Bike Trail (Washington St. to west of Park Avenue) )escription 3onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Avenue 50 from Washington Street to just west of Park Avenue and between Via Montana anc Madison Street Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 40,425 40,425 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 40,425 0 40,425 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 1,500 1,500 Engineering 3,000 3,000 Construction 30,000 30,000 Inspection 2,925 2,925 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 3,000 3,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 40,425 0 40,425 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 122 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD69 - Desert Club Drive Class III Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Avenue 52) )escription ;onstruction of a Class III Bike Trail on Desert Club Drive between Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 10,780 10,780 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 10,780 0 10,780 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 400 400 Engineering 800 800 Construction 8,000 8,000 Inspection 780 780 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 800 800 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 10.780 0 10,780 Oneratinn Cnsfc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 123 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD70 - Eisenhower Drive Class II Bike Trail (Avenida Montezuma to Calle Sinaloa) lescription ;onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Eisenhower Drive between Avenida Montezuma and Calle Sinaloa Revenue Amounts Cateaory To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 13,475 13,475 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 13,475 0 13,475 Categog To Be Determined Total Administration 500 500 Engineering 1,000 1,000 Construction 10,000 10,000 Inspection 975 975 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 1,000 1,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 13,475 0 13,475 Onaratinn Cnctc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 124 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD71 - Eisenhower Drive Class III Bike Trail (Washington Street to Avenida Fernando) Description Construction of a Class III Bike Trail on Eisenhower Drive between Washington Street and Avenida Fernando Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 26,950 26,950 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 1,000 1,000 Engineering 2,000 2,000 Construction 20,000 20,000 Inspection 1,950 1,950 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 2,000 2,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Ooeratino Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 125 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD72 - Miles Avenue Class II Bike Trail (Adams Street to Dune Palms Road) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on Miles Avenue between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 33,688 33,688 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 33,688 0 33,688 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 1,250 1,250 Engineering 2,500 2,500 Construction 25,000 25,000 Inspection 2,438 2,438 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 2,500 2,500 Other: 0 Ex ease Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 33,688 0 33,688 Oneratlna Costs Catego!)! _ To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 126 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD73 - Avenue 52 Class II Bike Trail (Jefferson Street to Coachella Canal) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on Avenue 52 between Jefferson Street and the Coachella Canal Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 26,950 26,950 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 1,000 1,000 Engineering 2,000 2,000 Construction 20,000 20,000 Inspection 1,950 1,950 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 2,000 2,000 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Operatinq Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 127 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD74 - Avenida Bermudas Class II Bike Trail (Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa, South Side Only) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on the south side of Avenida Bermudas between Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 26,950 26,950 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 1,000 1,000 Engineering 2,000 2,000 Construction 20,000 20,000 Inspection 1,950 1,950 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 2,000 2,000 Other. 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 26,950 0 26,950 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 128 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD75 - Highway 111 Class II Bike Trail (Washington Street to Indio City Limits) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on Highway 111 between Washington Street and the Indio City Limits Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 114,538 114,538 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 114,538 0 114,538 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 4,250 4,250 Engineering 8,500 8,500 Construction 85,000 85,000 Inspection 8,288 8,288 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 8,500 8,500 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 114,538 0 114,538 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 129 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD76 - Jefferson Street Class II Bike Trail (Avenue 58 to Madison Street) )ascription ;onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Jefferson Street between Avenue 58 and Madison Street Revenue Amounts Cateaory To Be Determined Total I General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 262,763 262,763 Other: 0 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 9,750 9,750 Engineering 19,500 19,500 Construction 195,000 195,000 Inspection 19,013 19,013 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 19,500 19,500 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 262,763 0 262,763 OnRratinn Cnstc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 130 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD77 - Madison Street Class II Bike Trail (Avenue 60 to Jefferson Street & Ave. 50 to Ave. 52) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on Madison Street between Avenue 60 and Jefferson Street and between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 256,025 256,025 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 256,025 0 256.025 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 9,500 9,500 Engineering 19,000 19,000 Construction 190,000 190,000 Inspection 18,525 18,525 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 19,000 19,000 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 256,025 0 256.025 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 131 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD78 - Fred Waring Drive Class II Bike Trail (Washington Street to Jefferson Street) lescription :onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and Jefferson Street Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 101,063 101,063 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 101,063 0 101,063 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 3,750 3,750 Engineering 7,500 7,500 Construction 75,000 75,000 Inspection 7,313 7,313 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 7,500 7,500 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 101,063 0 101,063 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 132 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD79 - Avenue 50 Class III Bike Trail (Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street) )escription :onstruction of a Class III Bike Trail on Avenue 50 between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 21,560 21,560 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 21,560 0 21,560 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 800 800 Engineering 1,600 1,600 Construction 16,000 16,000 Inspection 1,560 1,560 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 1,600 1,600 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 21,560 0 21,560 Oneratina Costs Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-I3 133 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD80 - Avenue 58 Class II Bike Trail (Just west of Monroe Street to Monroe Street) )ascription ;onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Avenue 58 from just west of Monroe Street to Monroe Street Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 20,213 20,213 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,213 0 20,213 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 750 750 Engineering 1,500 1,500 Construction 15,000 15,000 Inspection 1,463 1,463 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 1,500 1,500 Other: 0 [Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 20,213 0 20,213 Oneratinn Cnsts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 134 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD81 - Avenue 60 Class II Bike Trail (Monroe Street to Eastern City Limit) )escription ;onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Avenue 60 between Monroe Street and the Eastern City Limit Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 13,475 13,475 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 13,475 0 13,475 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 500 500 Engineering 1,000 1,000 Construction 10,000 10,000 Inspection 975 975 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 1,000 1,000 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 13,475 0 13,475 Oneratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 135 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD82 - Avenue 62 Class II Bike Trail (Madison Street to Monroe Street) Description Construction of a Class II Bike Trail on Avenue 62 between Madison Street and Monroe Street Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 67,375 67,375 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 67.375 0 67,375 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 2,500 2,500 Engineering 5,000 5,000 Construction 50,000 50,000 Inspection 4,875 4,875 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 5,000 5,000 Other: 0 Ex ense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 67,375 0 67,375 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 136 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Miscellaneous Improvement Project: AD83 - Monroe Street Class II Bike Trail (Ave. 54 to Mtn. View Lane & Ave. 58 to Ave. 62) )escription ,onstruction of a Class II Bike Trail on Monroe Street between Avenue 54 and Mountain View Lane and between Avenue 58 an kvenue 62 Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 0 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: To be determined 168,438 168,438 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 168,438 0 168,438 Category To Be Determined Total Administration 6,250 6,250 Engineering 12,500 12,500 Construction 125,000 125,000 Inspection 12,188 12,188 Professional 0 Other: Contingency 12,500 12,500 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 168,438 0 168,438 Ooeratina Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Printed: 23-Apr-13 137 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA1 - Toll Brothers Tract 30357 Description Installation of 1/2 median island and median landscape on Avenue 50 from Jefferson Street to Madison Street. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 627,972 627,972 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 627,972 0 627,972 tx ense Amounrs Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 627,972 627,972 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 627,972 0 627,972 Clnoratinn Cnctc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD9. Printed: 23-Apr-I3 138 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA2 - Lennar Homes Tract 29323 )escription Aedian Landscape on Fred Waring Drive. Revenue Amounts Cateqoy To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 586,670 586,670 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 586,670 0 686,670 Expense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection ❑ Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 586,670 586,670 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 586,670 0 586,670 r7nwratinn r:nctu Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD04. Printed: 23-Apr-13 139 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA3 - Inovative Communities Tract 34243 Description Avenue 58 Street Improvements. Revenue Amounts Cats o To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 130,800 130,800 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 130,800 0 130,800 t:x ease Amounts Categog To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 130,800 130,800 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 130,800 0 130.800 Operating Costs Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD11. Printed: 23-Apr-13 140 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA4 - Madison Club Tract 33076 Description 1/2 Street Improvement, Median Island and Median Island Landscape on Avenue 52 from Madison Street to 1/2 Mile east of Madison Street. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 669,920 669.920 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 669,920 0 669,920 tx ense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 669,920 669,920 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 669,920 0 669,920 Oneratinn Cncts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD10. Printed: 23-Apr-13 141 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA5 - ND La Quinta Partners Tract 29894 lescription 9edian Landscape on Avenue 52. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 1,344.690 1,344,690 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,344,690 0 1.344,690 Expense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 1,344,690 1,344,690 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 1,344,690 0 1,344.690 Oneratina Costs Cate o To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD10. Printed: 23-Apr-13 142 CITY OF LA QUINTA: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DETAIL Project Type: Developer Impact Fee Reimbursement Project: DRA6 - TD Desert Development Tract 29283 )ascription ledian Landscape on Avenue 50. Revenue Amounts Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Infrastructure 0 Project Area 1 0 Project Area 2 0 DIF - Transportation 186,900 186,900 DIF - Parks & Recreation 0 DIF - Civic Center 0 DIF - Library 0 DIF - Community Center 0 DIF - Maintenance Facility 0 Other: 0 Other: 0 Revenue Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 186,900 0 186,900 rx ense Amounts Category To Be Determined Total Administration 0 Engineering 0 Construction 0 Inspection 0 Professional 0 Other: Developer Reimbursement 186,900 186,900 Other: 0 Expense Amount Total 0 0 0 0 0 186,900 0 186,900 Onarafinn Cnctc Category To Be Determined Total General Fund 0 Other: 0 Operating Cost Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Additional Comments: Improvements included within the Developer Agreement were previously part of AD9. Printed: 23-Apr-13 143 T4hf 4 4 a" CITY SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 ITEM TITLE: ZONE CHANGE 2012-142 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146 TO REZONE AND CONVERT AN EXISTING 15,933 SQUARE - FOOT BUILDING INTO AN INDOOR MINIATURE GOLF RECREATIONAL FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUNE PALMS ROAD AND CORPORATE CENTRE DRIVE. APPLICANT: ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF, LLC. RECOMMENDED ACTION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 3 Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council approving Zone Change 2012-142, subject to the attached Findings; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2012- 146, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit would allow an indoor miniature golf recreational facility and family entertainment center in the Regional Commercial zoning district. The subject property is an existing commercial building located at 46-805 Dune Palms Road (La Quinta Valley Plaza)• Only interior tenant improvements are required to accommodate these uses and no significant alterations to the building exterior and site are proposed. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject property and building was approved by the City Council and constructed in 2003. The approval consisted of an approximately 16,000 square foot commercial retail building located on a one -acre parcel with 43 parking spaces within the La Quinta Valley Plaza (Attachment 1). RadioActive was the tenant until the business closed in 2011; the building has been vacant since. Zone Change/General Plan Amendment: The property is currently within the Commercial Park zoning district. The applicant is proposing Regional Commercial zoning (Attachment 2). A General Plan Amendment is not necessary as the La Quinta 2035 General Plan identifies a land use designation of General Commercial for this site, which is consistent with the Regional Commercial zoning designation. The La Quinta Valley Plaza includes both Regional Commercial and Commercial Park zoning, with most of the development having Regional Commercial zoning. This is namely due to the Plaza abutting two highly -traveled roadways, Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. A change in zoning from Commercial Park to Regional Commercial would be compatible with the surrounding land uses and commercial functions that are designated Regional Commercial. The 2035 General Plan now permits a variety of uses that were prohibited in the Commercial Park zone in the Regional Commercial zone. These uses, including dry cleaners, professional and medical offices, and restaurants, among others, are more in line with the uses and development patterns of the La Quinta Valley Plaza. Conditional Use Permit: The La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.80.040 requires a conditional use permit for miniature golf/recreation centers located within the Regional Commercial zoning district. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing building into an indoor miniature golf recreational facility and family entertainment center, entitled Rock n Roll Mini Golf (Attachment 3). The facility would include a rock 'n roll-themed 18-hole black -light miniature golf course, arcade, snack bar, and event/party rooms (Attachment 4). Business hours would be Tuesday through Sunday, closed on Monday except for holidays. Hours of operation would be from 10:00 a.m. to midnight. Private parties, corporate events, field trips, and other family gatherings may also take place during normal business hours. Staff has concluded that the Rock n Roll Mini Golf establishment will be able to operate at the proposed location with minimal impacts on the other existing surrounding uses. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial for the proposed location, as well as the permitted land uses stated in the approved Specific Plan for the La Quinta Valley Plaza. La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.150.060 requires that miniature golf courses provide three parking spaces per hole, plus the spaces required for additional uses on the site, resulting in the need for 63 parking stalls. As previously noted, the subject property currently provides for 43 parking spaces. However, additional unused parking exists within the La Quinta Valley Plaza. Current uses within the La Quinta Valley Plaza are primarily daytime; only a limited number of businesses are open after 7:00 p.m. and on the weekends. It is anticipated that the peak business time for Rock n Roll Golf will be when most of the La Quinta Valley Plaza businesses are closed. A shared parking study was completed in 2011, which identified that peak parking demand for the Plaza, which is 1:00 p.m. on weekday afternoons, a surplus of 11 spaces existed. During the peak operating hours of the Rock n Roll Mini Golf establishment, after 4:00 p.m., a surplus of nearly 60 parking spaces existed. As a result of the peak/off-peak relationship of operating hours between the Rock n Roll Mini Golf business and the existing businesses, an ample amount of parking spaces exist within the La Quinta Valley Plaza to accommodate Mini Golf customers and employees while also leaving sufficient parking for the other neighboring businesses. Therefore, based on this parking analysis, staff has determined that the 43 existing parking spaces located on the Rock n Roll Mini Golf parcel combined with the surplus of parking spaces available within the La Quinta Valley Plaza can accommodate the proposed use. The applicant is currently working with the owners of the La Quinta Valley Plaza to secure a shared parking agreement to address the shortage of 20 spaces. A condition of approval has been added requiring this agreement be established prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and to revisit the parking status within six months of business opening. The applicant is also exploring the potential of adding eight parking spaces in the service area at the rear of the building, thus reducing the number of spaces required in the parking agreement from 20 to 12. ALTERNATIVES: The alternative actions available to the City Council include denying the request, referring the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration, or discussion and incorporation of any adjustments deemed appropriate in order to approve the proposal. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on December 5, 2012. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Community Development Department. All applicable comments have been incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2013, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the City Council hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At their regular meeting of April 9, 2013, the La Quinta Planning Commission, on a 5-0 vote, recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed project (Attachment 5). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the proposed use is within an existing facility, and the change of zone will not result in an intensification of land use on the approximately one -acre parcel. Report prepared by: Jay Wuu, Associate Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Proposed Zone Change Exhibit 3. Rock n Roll Mini Golf Conditional Use Permit Packet 4. Rock n Roll Mini Golf Business Plan 5. Minutes of April 9, 2013 Planning Commission Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable. Mayor and Members of VIA: Frank J. Spevacek, City FROM: Les Johnson, Planning DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 - Indoor Miniature Golf Recreation Facility - Amendment to Condition of Approval Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 includes a condition addressing assurance of adequacy of parking being provided for the proposed use (condition of approval #7). As currently written, this condition requires a shared use parking agreement between the applicant and the adjacent property owner(s). Further discussion with the applicant late last week resulted in Staff conducting further research of the proposed use as well as consideration of parking requirements from other cities. Based upon the additional research conducted, Staff believes that the on - site parking stalls identified by the applicant will adequately serve the identified use despite the City's minimum parking space requirements. However, the City's Municipal Code does not allow for deviation beyond what is specified. Thus, Staff is recommending language change to this condition, which would read as follows: 7. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Rock n Roll Mini Golf, the applicant shall compete one of the following: a. A shared parking agreement shall be obtained between the property owners of the Rock n Roll Mini Golf parcel and the La Quinta Valley Plaza property owner's association for a minimum of twenty (20) parking spaces. A copy of this agreement shall be provided to the Community Development Department, or b. Complete a parking analysis identifying the existing on -site parking will adequately serve the proposed land use as provided for in La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9. 150.050B. Said parking analysis shall be conducted by a qualified individual or firm approved by the Community Development Director. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2012-142, A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR A SINGLE PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL PARK TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL CASE: ZONE CHANGE 2012-142 APPLICANT: ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 71h day of May, 2013, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC to consider a change in zoning from Commercial Park to Regional Commercial, generally located on the southwest corner of Dune Palms Road and Corporate Centre Drive, more particularly described as: APN: 600-390-023 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 91h day of April, 2013, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Zone Change, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2013-002, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change 2012-142; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2013 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public Hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings recommending approval of said Zone Change: Finding A: Consistency with General Plan The zone change is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan, which are not being amended. The purpose of the change in land use designation is to make the property's land use designation consistent with adjacent and nearby properties. Finding B: Public Welfare Approval of the zone change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare in that the proposed change will not result Ordinance No. Zone Change 2012-142 Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC May 7, 2013 Page 2 in a substantial change to an existing recreational area, will not result in the loss of existing wildlife habitat, nor will it have an effect on the conditions of the existing surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zone change will not result in any changed conditions to the exterior of the building and will therefore have no effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community or surrounding natural environment. Finding C: Land Use Compatibility The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties because the proposed miniature golf recreation center use is compatible with the surrounding existing restaurants, medical offices, and commercial retail businesses. The zone change will bring the property into conformance with the proposed project and will have no effect on adjacent existing land uses Finding D: Property Suitability The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the property is within an existing commercial shopping center and is adjacent to similarly zoned properties. Finding E: Changes in Circumstance Approval of the zone change is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing zoning was imposed. The La Quinta Valley Plaza, which incorporates both Regional Commercial and Commercial Park zoning along with a Specific Plan, has developed through the years primarily with uses consistent with the Regional Commercial land use/zoning. This is due to the fact that the development abuts two highly -traveled roadways, Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. When Corporate Centre Drive is developed to its full capacity, the plaza, including the proposed Rock n Roll Mini Golf parcel, would have the visibility and functions of a regional commercial center on three road frontages. Thus, a change in zoning from Commercial Park to Regional Commercial for the subject parcel would be compatible with the surrounding properties, land uses, and commercial functions, which are already designated Regional Commercial. Furthermore, with the recent adoption of the updated General Plan, the land use designation of the property changed from Commercial Park to General Commercial. A variety of uses that were prohibited in the Commercial Park zone are now available as part of the Regional Commercial zone. These uses, including dry cleaners, professional and medical offices, and restaurants, among others, are more in line with the uses and development patterns of the La Quinta Valley Plaza. Ordinance No. Zone Change 2012-142 Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC May 7, 2013 Page 3 Many of the uses that were permitted in the Commercial Park zone but are now prohibited as part of the proposed Regional Commercial zone are industrial -related uses, which are inconsistent with the development of the plaza, and are also subject to additional restrictions in the La Quinta Valley Plaza Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, that it does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 The La Quinta Official Zoning Map is hereby amended by rezoning the property described as APN: 600-390-023 from Commercial Park to Regional Commercial. The properties for such rezoning are shown and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL The Community Development Department has determined that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Chapter 2.6, Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code, California Environmental Quality Act Statutes, and Section 15061(b)(3), Review for Exemptions of the CEQA Guidelines, and pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1) in that the proposed use is within an existing facility, and the change of zone will not result in an intensification of land use on the approximately one -acre parcel. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4: POSTING The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 71h day of May, 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: Ordinance No. Zone Change 2012-142 Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC May 7, 2013 Page 4 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING ZONING: COMMERCIAL PARK (CP) PROPOSED ZONING: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (CR) NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - Regional Commercial ® Community Commercial cry Neighborhootl Commercial cT TomcA Commercial Oi Industrial — Cfrice Commercial MC Major Community Facilities cc I Commercial Park CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146, PERMITTING A MINIATURE GOLF/FAMILY RECREATION CENTER CASE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146 APPLICANT: ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF, LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 71h day of May, 2013, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC to allow the conversion of an existing 15,933 square foot building into an indoor miniature golf recreational facility, generally located on the southwest corner of Dune Palms Road and Corporate Centre Drive, more particularly described as: APN: 600-390-023 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 91h day of April, 2013, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a recommendation on said Conditional Use Permit, and after hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2013-003, recommending to the City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit 2012-146; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2012 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to Code to justify approval of Conditional Use Permit 2012-146: Finding A: Consistency with General Plan The land use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City's General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage a full range of retail, office, resort, and institutional businesses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. City Council Resolution 2013- Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC May 7, 2013 Page 2 Finding B: Consistency with Zoning Code With approval of the proposed zone change, the use is consistent with the provisions of the zoning code. As conditioned, the use of the site as miniature golf recreation center will have minimal impacts on the surrounding land uses as the use is contained within the existing building, and will conform to the development standards applicable to the use. Finding C: Compliance with CEQA Processing of this Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. The La Quinta Planning Department has determined that this project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project is less than five acres, is an existing urban infill development located on a previously graded and partially improved parcel, and is consistent with the current General Plan policies, zoning regulations, and zoned land use. Finding D: Surrounding Uses As conditioned, approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity. The proposed use is completely contained within an existing building, there is adequate parking available for the use, and the other properties within the commercial center have been developed with similar commercial retail uses. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta. California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case; and 2. That it does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 7<h day of May, 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: City Council Resolution 2013- Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 Rock n Roll Mini Golf, LLC May 7, 2013 Page 3 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146 ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF MAY 7, 2013 C;FNFRAI 1. The applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of La Quinta, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel at its sole discretion. The City of La Quinta shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), including LQMC Chapter 9.210.020. 3. Any expansion of this use or substantial modifications to the approved floor plan shall require an amendment of this conditional use permit. Minor modifications to this Conditional Use Permit shall be considered by the Community Development Director in accordance with LQMC 9.200.090, and may require notification of surrounding property owners prior to such approval. All other amendments shall be processed in accordance with LQMC 9.200.100. 4. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary permits and/or clearances from the following agencies: • Fire Marshal • Sheriff's Department The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. PARKING/CIRCULATION 5. No on -street public parking outside the Rock n Roll Mini Golf parcel and La Quinta Valley Plaza parking lot may be reserved for customer parking. All on -street public parking areas shall remain available for public use. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2012-146 ROCK N ROLL MINI GOLF MAY 7, 2013 6. Roadways/traffic aisles to structures and activities in and around the business shall be maintained accessible to emergency vehicles at all times. 7. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Rock n Roll Mini Golf, a shared parking agreement shall be obtained between the property owners of the Rock n Roll Mini Golf parcel and the La Quinta Valley Plaza property owner's association for a minimum of twenty (20) parking spaces. A copy of this agreement shall be provided to the Community Development Department. The Conditional Use Permit shall be re -visited to make sure the designated parking is adequate and has not impinged upon any of the neighboring retail businesses. This review shall occur within 6 months of the business opening. MISCELLANEOUS 8. No signage is included in this Conditional Use Permit approval. A separate Sign Permit is required through the Community Development Department if the applicant proposes signs for the business. The applicant shall comply with the Radio Active Sign Program, unless a letter of request to annul the Program is submitted. 9. Hours of operation shall occur only on the days and times specified in the Conditional Use Permit, which are based on the Business Plan provided to the City by the applicant. Changes to these hours that do not conflict with normal business hours of the other tenants in the La Quinta Valley Plaza may be approved by the Community Development Director. 10. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to review and monitor the operation of this facility and modify Conditions of Approval regarding hours of operation, occupancy, and other operational conditions. ATTACHMENT # 1 r� MV '�-� ",;fir• • y � � ®�_.;..• .�_r �` /,. r P � � ��i + I � . ' �. ' ` - ` O u. r • �. a +��`--ti � / ar r V' - R F� r A •_� �` � ' Project Site a, s. ry• M• J M;S tr- M Ta ��ilta••'•� .••. :�` t"" rt��`� x'�!•rf !'.•/ t �} � EXISTING ZONING: COMMERCIAL PARK (CP) ATTACHMENT # 2 w mwww��- � PROPOSED ZONING: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (CR) wmww�� NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - Regional Commercial - Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial - Tourist Commercial Industrial - Office Commercial Major Community Facilities pCommercial Park ATTACHMENT H 3 SHAN<Z BLAC<LIGHI NINIGOLF siwwgD HD DR-�L.. _ INDEX SHEET AI INDEX SWEET P2 EX15TiNG SITE PLAN P3 PROP05ED FLOOR PLAN PROJECT DATA DESERT PALM MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC -APN s 400-390-023-3(400K/PAGE: PMB93/85) -LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED PARCEL "A' OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 02-Sll APNt14-020-049 GRANT DEED PER DOCUMENT NO.32,1124 RECORDED JUNE 14,2002 COUNTRY OF RIVERSIDE PROJECT 15 A PART Or ADOPTED SPECIFIC PLAN 99-03s NO CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS ARE PROPOSED UNDER THIS PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN -GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION COMMERCIAL PARK -EXISTING ZONING COMMERCIAL PARK -PROPOSED ZONING GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1 t�l 01 -SPECIFIC PLAN TITLE ! CEO' SP 99-014 -EXISTING LAND U8! COMMERCIAL PARK 0 -TOTAL SQUARE FEET/ACRES iivwsiCIO County 7LMA GI S lij i; 9 Of9 Fcyt/ 43 6L0 9Q.FT. / 1.0 ACRES OF SITEBAUREA AREA (EX1971HG) t PERCENTAGE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 15T FLOOR IAREA,12,898 SQ.FT. ` 2ND FLOOR AREA: _ 3,035 50.FT. - 34.5 Y. TOTALAREA: 15,43350-FT. 0 T_ -TOTAL PARKING AREA (EXISTING) t PERCENTAGE % -me OF SITE AREA 13.264 SQ.FT. PARKING 1EX13TINGW43,640 SQ.FT. SITE- SOAX -TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (EXISTING) t PERCENTAGE OF SITE 3,0 • . - s 43.5L0 SQFT�LANDSCAPE SITE - 21.8% 12.09T SQ.FT. La a Riverside County TLMA GISINICkj I �� AERIAL MAP -TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA (EXISTING) t PERCENTAGE OF SITE AREA 2.306 SQ.PT.HARDSCAPE{EXISTING)/ 43.540 SQ.FT. SITE - 5.3% n 1 w, -IDENTIFICATION OF PARKING RATIOS K PITCH t PUTT, PAR THREE / MINIATURE GOLF COURSES 3 SPACES PER HOLE, PLUS THE SPACES REQUIRED FOR r I ADDITIONAL USES ON THE SITE, I .7j FIRST FLOOR - fMMIATURE GOLF) 18 HOLES X 3 = 34 PARKING SPACES - 2ND FLOOR AREA - fOFF!CE AREA) s 1 SPACES PER 250 50,FT, 2,010 50.FT. / 250 = 8.0 OR 9 PARKING SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED - 44 PARKING SPACES TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED - 43 PARKING SPACES t �+ -NUMBER OF ADA PARKING SPACES REQ, t PROVIDED ADA PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 2 ADA PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 1 -GREATEST BUILDING HRIGHTs EXISTING 21'-0' -OCCUPANCY TYPE. B 151 NOT TO SCALE -BUILDING TYPES TYPE VS (FULLY FIRE SPRMKLED) A+ohittoturt Planning €n prior Damign it ROBERT H. RICCIARDI ARCII[TECT ROBERT H. RICCIARDI N.C.A.RB. 76-400 GErRALD MRD DR, 9iiM 115 PALU DESERT, CALIFORNIA 922€i TELEPHONE 781, 610-50338 PAX 78¢J 5€0-5037 ND. DATE ftm.0" ATENANT WROYDANT SHANKZ BLACKLIGHT MINIGOLF nxt-1T �`ONAL190R 16_005DIXf PA#_h* . LA CUNTA. tALFOWJA M53 T: t INDEX SHEET A w _ `� ''Lp1 w� csnae� . �1.+SITa.- /V >> ; "E MW txl5 I INU 5i i t rLAN SCALE 1/19" . P-0" w 5 �-.� 7r ROBERT H. RICCIAR➢I ARCHITECT RABM R. R=JARDI M.C.&Ra 75-400 GERAM FORD DR "IR6 115 PAW AFSUM, CALi T M1A 22211 TELEPHONE 7b0% 610-501" PAX 784/ 610-5037 DA7s AEYOIDIIS PADWT A nWA?ff AWO4Om,T SHANKZ BLACKLIGHT MINIGOLF MSO- 47 EDM SOMO111(K ALWWA, 7452M CAP" 46-605 DUNE PALMS FID. LA CA)M . CALJFOAPSA 02253 7RIE EXISTING SITE PLAN NOY.9OM "� G P2 8a � art' C=fl15� n "mum �Mh .o 04 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN_ LA151 INCH 1=HZj I tLCVf'1I IVN ow" Wr- nr 94 OWT04 DOOMS i--l- 7l . 44 wwl"M1 T 1HIMJOi 60of »valwa R THMUOM q4 lwo w 67RM11� neq�e reAun 0 poomm" KW MAL REA 161 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 6c"w.?r ,ra.�.. ..... .r. "* it ROBERT H. RKUNARDI ARCHITECT ROBM It RKKAAW Nr-% -L 73-M 6FAAW FM OR. OURS 116 PALM DPSOM CALFOFM QW1 TVJP"O O mwe1a�m FAX 7w rAeam GENERAL NOTES 18 Hole Shama Golf Area: Approx. 4014 SF Themes: Rock and Rol! (Props to be determined) Props: 8 Lockbox: 1 Arches: 2 Challenger Props: 4 Entrance Arch: 1 SHANKZ BLACKLIGHT MINIGOLF N o-per ftm0m 45-M DUNE PALL PD. uar�rtA, cxtus� "TU PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR. EXISTING SECOND FLOOR & EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 110Y.>b1! .,+r• P3 pow ATTACHMENT # 4 BUSINESS PLAN Rock 'N' Roll Mini Golf The Business Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf is a Family Entertainment Center featuring an indoor miniature golf course with a Rock and Roll theme. Including video games, redemption games, private parry/function rooms and other activities. Host birthday parties, corporate/teambuilding events, field trips and other family gatherings. Family Entertainment is a highly profitable industry that has been growing rapidly over the past several years. This is due largely to a trend within the country to return to family values. The initial profit centers will be the miniature golf course, video arcade and party rooms. Marketing There are over 500,000 full time permanent residents in The Coachella Valley. One of the interesting facts about the miniature golf business is the breadth of the customer base. While families with children may act as an anchor, seniors teens, and corporate customers add significant income. In addition the Desert Resorts within the Coachella Valley experiences a large increase in seasonal population most are aware of the golfing opportunities here. A variety of fun promotions will keep the business profitable year round. Management Managing Member: Hal -La -Rae Gallagher Ms. Gallagher is an Executive with Fantasy Springs Casino. She works in tourism, marketing and promotions. Previously she had overseen the department of floor gaming, machine operations as well as guest hospitality. Member: Jody Erdahl Mr. Erdahl is an Electrical Contractor. Operating his own company with an expertise in animatronics since 1995. Golf Consultant: Glen McGihon Mr. McGihon is the Golf Pro Emeritus at The Vintage and The Reserve Country Clubs and serves as the consultant on all golf related operations. Keys to Success A high trafficked site near the center of the population. Friendly, happy employees providing a superior golf experience. A safe, clean environment the community will be proud of. Having fun while delivering a quality product. Company Summary Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf is a Family Entertainment Center with a world class Rock and Roll Themed design and layout. Miniature golf is not golf in miniature. However, miniature golf does have a lot in common with regulation golf. To be interesting miniature golf holes must have the contour changes found on a regulation green, which cause the ball to break and turn as it rolls toward the cup. Undulations and banking give the game an element of challenge and fun. The anchor of Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf is Polystyrene Fabrication and Polystyrenes Mold Casting of several Rock `N' Roll graphics and design. Unlike miniature golf course of old windmills and standing bears are not found on these custom themed Mini Golf course. Modem Miniature golf courses are visually appealing with graphic art and Animatronics. The golf course is being designed and built by Art Attack. They are experienced experts in miniature course design, theming, course construction and installation. They will also be supplying Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf all the required golfing clubs, golf balls and inventory. Hours of Operation: Tuesday -Thursday noon-1 Opm Friday - noon -midnight Saturday loam -midnight Sunday l0am-IOpm Monday- closed except for holidays Number of Employees: 6 Products and Services Miniature Golf: The primary attraction is the world class 18-hole miniature golf course, where participants have fun for only $9.00 per round. The challenge in miniature golf is to make the course interesting to play. Interesting shots bring repeat business. Undulations, banking, the size of the greens, the position of the cups, the intermixing of easier holes with more difficult holes to prevent back-up on the course and hundreds of other Iittle refinements, which come only from experience. On a well -designed course, a player is rewarded for a good putt without being overly penalized for a poor putt. If you hit the putt correctly it will go in the cup. If you hit it poorly it may take two or three putts to get it in the cup, but you are not "out of play" or holding up the group behind you. Players take about one hour to complete a round of golf. The course can easily accommodate up to 100 players per hour during peak times. These numbers are common on weekend evenings during the "season". Video Arcade: The video arcade has a mix of popular games for children of all ages. The games vary in type and skill level. Some are physically oriented; others focus on hand eye coordination. The most profitable games issue tickets that may be redeemed for prizes. The arcade will be operated on a 50 — 50 split with a regional arcade company. In a national survey of Family Entertainment Companies "FEC" operators, respondents reported coin -operated games, both redemption / skill and video, were the second top attraction and revenue source, behind birthday parties. While FEC operators may have different attractions, all of them have video and/or redemption games. Food Service: A small snack bar will serve fountain drinks, hot dogs, chips, and other related items. The food area will also provide space for birthdays and other private events. We have contracted with an outside source for Food Services and Catering. Customers will walk through the food service area to and from the miniature golf course. As the customers walk off the 180' hole they will find hot dogs, chips, other snacks and fountain drinks, as shown above awaiting them. The food service is a profitable portion of the business. Market Segmentation Our market segmentation scheme is fairly straight forward. The Miniature Golf Club of America and the Association of Fun and Relaxation both have excellent market research and have highlighted the following target audiences. Individuals: There are over 500,000 people living within the Coachella Valley. The typical miniature golf customer ranges in age from six to sixty-four, with a family income over $39,900. This large swath of society provides a broad customer base in Riverside County. Families: With young children enjoy the outings. Miniature golf is one of the few activities teenagers find acceptable to do with parents. This is demonstrated in research, which shows that children 5 to 18 years old, with at least one adult, represent the largest single audience at 35.9%. (According to the Association of Fun and Relaxation annual report). Teens and Young Adults: age 15 to 24, will make outings a date or a group event. We note here that teens fit into two separate market segments. They may enjoy an outing as part of a family unit or independently as part of a peer group. Adults: Age 25 to 54, find the recreation enjoyable, with or without children or grandchildren. Seniors: Age 55 to 74, find the gentle form of recreation refreshing, whether alone or with grandchildren. There is literally no age limit to our golf demographic. Private Groups: Using FEC's range from children's birthday parties to gamily get togethers. Groups are particularly desirable because they can be scheduled in advance, guests of the party may decide they would like to hold the same event themselves and groups are low cost, high profit events that require little or no additional staffing. Organizations: Using the centers may be Church Groups, Civic Organizations, Office get togethers, Customer Appreciation Events or Corporate Parties. While the prime time for individual customers is evening and weekend, the wide group customer base allows Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf to schedule available hours for maximum facility utilization particularly during the "season". The goal is to get the customer in the door, keep them entertained and get them to come back! Competition Direct competition for identical facilities is not found in the Coachella Valley. While there are competitive miniature golf courses in the Los Angeles and Bakersfield area, they are well outside the Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf market. There is one local miniature golf course in Palm Springs however it is outdoors and in our opinion does not qualify as competition. History has proven there are two types of businesses that thrive in depressed economic times. These two categories of businesses are alcohol and family entertainment. As far back as the depression of the early 1930's, the family entertainment industry has performed well in prosperous times and in economic downturns. Marketing Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf will be positioned as a relaxing worry -free environment where friends and families enjoy time together. This unique new facility will draw return visitors to the attractive, clean, safe setting. Carefully designed advertising and promotions will accurately target the target market segments. While fun and excitement are the main draws that bring customers in the door, the value pricing and excellent location are also important factors. Rock `N' Roll Mini Golf pricing is designed to appeal to all levels of the economic spectrum. A game of miniature golf will only be $9.00 per person. Children under 5 free with an adult_ This price is lover than a movie and the experience lasts as long. As well we provide "event or party" settings. The arcade games will operate with tokens. Free tokens can be given to each participant at a birthday parties, corporate event, each golf game, or other marketing promotions at our location or anywhere within the community at large. Tokens are also available for sale. INDUSTRY GROWTH 2O08-2010 ��N'a x� � -r �',� 7 � .Y.A �•=r`�yt _ .1 r ' M:-3� Y •~42�� t s /` • ^-S iy � - _ 7�.7..%raL" !i er g _ .0 � ,t a e Div � w 3y :ti..: _ - uL�.{�.�i , :«.a i� •' r t., at'.-t�%�:i"i Cr 2003 1 0 0 0 2 2009 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2010 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 FL 2009 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2009 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2010 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 GA 2008 1 0 0 0 0 0 l 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2010 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 IN 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2009 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 2010 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 MA 2008 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 2009 1 '5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2010 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 MD 2003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 w 2009 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2010 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 NY 2008 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2010 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 OR 2009 1 -+ 1� 0 0 0 0 2 2009 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2010 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 PA 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2009 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2010 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 RI 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 l 2009 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2010 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 PROVIDED BY THE MINITURE GOLFCLUB OF AMERICA �� }. `:: '�.�� b �t �� -.._ �. ,�,� ,. � - ��. a �� , I � ~ ��_ � �__ . � � - �� ''� .. -vim' acv.M#1� `.. k'.%e'. a �;,� � _ Y T .M. r �{ � .� �ru�v� �. �. �f,.'ti �, h•'1 ATTACHMENT # 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 9. 2013 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Chairperson Barrows. PRESENT: Commissioners Alderson, Chairperson Barrows. ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Community Develop Manager David Sawyi LLP, Associate Plann, Weber, Wilkinson, and Secretary Monika Radeva. Wright, and Les Johnson, Planning ko with Rutan and Tucker, ssistant Planner Eric Ceja, Commissioner Weber led the Commiss+on in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA -.Confirmed" 40, APPROVAL OF MINUttS Motion �A motio s made ,and seconded by Commissioners Weber/Alderson to approve. the Planning gmmission Minutes of February 12, 2012, as submitted with a:. correction on "Pe ##4, under Adjournment, to reflect that Charwoman Barrows was in attendant>ce, and Vice Chairman Wright was absent. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Zone Change 2012-142 and Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 submitted by Rock N Roll Mini Golf, LLC., proposing to rezone and convert an existing 15,933 square -foot building into an indoor miniature golf recreational facility. Location: Southwest corner of Dune Palms Road and Corporate Center Drive. Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 APRIL 9, 2013 Chairperson Barrows asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Alderson asked staff if there had been any feedback received from the adjacent property/business owners in favor of or in opposition to the proposed changes. Staff noted that the public hearing was published in the paper and anyone within five -hundred feet radius of the parcel was notified ten days prior to this hearing and no comments, written or verbal, had been received. Also, the applicant had done outreach and could further report on that. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:10 p.m. Mr. Jody Erdahl, Vice President of Rock N Roll Mini Golf, LLC., 43-115 Moore Circle, Bermuda Dunes, CA, introduced himself and said he was available to answer any questions the Commission might have. Commissioner Alderson asked for an explanation on what the applicant meant by redemption games in his proposal. Mr. Erdahl replied redemption games were when the player redeems a ticket for a prize. Commissioner Alderson said the proposed tenant improvements were quite substantial and asked what the target opening date was and if the sale of alcohol would be permitted on the premises. Mr. Erdahl replied September of 2013 and that no alcohol would be sold. There being no further questions or discussion, Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:12 p.m. ow Commissioner Weber thanked staff and the applicant for including a business plan of the proposed .operation making it easier for the Commission to gain a better understanding of what exactly was being proposed. Commissioner Wright said he was pleased to see that such use will be coming to the City of La Quinta giving entertainment variety to the youth in the city. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Weber to adopt Resolution 2013-002 recommending approval of Zone Change 2012- 142 as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Alderson/Weber to adopt Resolution 2013-003 recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit 2012-146 as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 APRIL 9, 2013 T4hf 4 4 a" AGENDA CATEGORY: CITY SA / HA / FA MEETING DATE: May 7, 2013 BUSINESS SESSION: ITEM TITLE: A THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONSENT CALENDAR: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875 FOR AN STUDY SESSION: APPROXIMATELY 234,450 SQUARE -FOOT RETAIL AND MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ON PUBLIC HEARING: 4 APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE. APPLICANT: MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a third time extension to Conditional Use Permit 2007-105, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval; and, Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving a third time extension to Site Development Permit 2006-875, subject to Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The approved project consists of a commercial/medical office complex located on approximately 25 acres at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive. The project was originally approved by the City Council in 2009. The applicant is requesting a third time extension with a two-year, rather than a one-year extension. A single condition of approval has changed, which reflects the recent implementation of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee. The applicant agrees with the revised conditions of approval. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: General On March 11, 2013, the applicant applied for a third extension of time for the proposed office development. Unlike the first two time extension requests, the applicant has requested a two-year time extension. La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080D provides for granting an extension to the period of validity for up to two years. The project was originally approved by City Council on March 17, 2009 (Attachment 1). The first time extension was approved on May 3, 2011 and the second was granted on May 15, 2012. This third extension, if approved, will extend the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Site Development Permit (SDP) to March 17, 2015. Project Description The approved project is a commercial and medical office complex (Attachment 2). Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. currently owns the entire site; however, the medical complex would be developed and owned by a different party (Mayer Villa Capri, L. P. would sell this parcel for development with the permitted uses). The approximately 104,000 square -foot commercial complex will be constructed on the existing westerly 12.3-acre parcel, while an approximately 130,450 square -foot medical office complex is proposed on the eastern 12.7-acre parcel. While the projects are separate, there will be vehicular and pedestrian connection provided between them. Tentative Parcel Map Extension A Tentative Parcel Map 35088 was also approved by City Council along with the CUP and SDP on March 17, 2009, proposing to divide the existing two lots into 10 parcels (Attachment 3). The map's original expiration date was the same as the CUP and SDP (March 17, 2011); however, Assembly Bills 333 and 208 have automatically extended the expiration date an additional four years. Revisions to Conditions of Approval As with the prior extension requests, there are no changes proposed to the project. Staff -recommended revisions to the conditions of approval are minimal and limited to updates based on changes in codes, procedures, and other requirements. All referenced conditions relate to their renumbered format, as reflected in the recommended conditions. Riverside County Fire Department conditions are not included as they were not included in the original approval and will be addressed when complete building plans are reviewed. The applicant agrees with the updated Conditions of Approval. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative actions include denying the two-year time extension and approving a one-year time extension, or discussion and incorporation of any adjustments deemed appropriate in order to approve the proposed time extension request. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on March 15, 2013. All written comments received are on file and available for review in the Community Development Department. All applicable comments are incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2013, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be distributed at the City Council meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Community Development Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project have been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2008-582 prepared for this project. In addition, an Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 17, 2009. None of the circumstances that would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 have occurred. Report prepared by: Jay Wuu, Associate Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson Community Development Director Attachments: 1 . Original City Council staff report and excerpt of minutes for the City Council meeting of March 17, 2009 2. Previously -approved plan exhibits 3. Approved Tentative Parcel Map 35088 RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A THIRD TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A CONVALESCENT/REHABILITATION FACILITY AS PART OF A MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX AND 10,000+ SQUARE FOOT RETAIL STORES LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON AND FRED WARING DRIVE CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105 EXT. 3 APPLICANT: MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 71h day of May, 2013, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a third extension of time for a Convalescent/Rehabilitation facility as part of an 130,450± square foot medical office complex and 10,000+ square foot retail stores as part of a 104,000± square foot commercial complex, located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive, more particularly described as: APN: 609-070-053 and 609-070-054 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 171h day of March, 2009, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2009-027, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 3''day of May, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2011-032, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a time extension for Conditional Use Permit; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 151h day of May, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2012-023, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a second time extension for Conditional Use Permit; and, WHEREAS, the applicant, on the 111h day of March, 2013, applied for a third time extension; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment Resolution 2013- Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 2 of 4 2008-582 prepared for this project for which an Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, nor has any new information been submitted which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review in accordance with Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice for this request in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2013, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of the Conditional Use Permit time extension: 1. Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that the project site is designated as General Commercial, which is intended to be developed with commercial uses similar to the Convalescent/Rehabilitation and retail uses proposed herein. These commercial/medical uses will therefore help achieve the goals and uses of the General Commercial designation. 2. Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 is consistent with the La Quinta Zoning Code in that it is conditionally permitted under the Community Commercial ("CC") zoning designation. The project's proposed uses are consistent with the uses identified in the CC district and have been designed and is conditioned to comply with the development standards of the CC district and other Zoning Code requirements such as parking, setbacks, building heights, and landscaping. 3. Processing and approval of Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Community Development Department has determined that the time extension request has been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2008-582 prepared for this project for which an Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the Resolution 2013- Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 3 of 4 preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. 4. Approval of Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or be injurious to or be incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity in that the commercial use is self-contained in a building that has been designed to be compatible with the adjacent medical office buildings and commercial complex surrounding the property. Furthermore, it is a significant distance from nearby residential and school uses and will not create conditions, such as noise, odors, traffic, etc,. that will be detrimental to adjacent properties. The use of 10,000+ square foot retail buildings will not be detrimental to the surrounding existing and proposed land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta. California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; 2. The Environmental Impact Report for the project was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, nor has any new information been submitted which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review in accordance with Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and 3. That it does hereby approve a third time extension to March 17, 2015 for Conditional Use Permit 2007-105, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 71h day of May, 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Resolution 2013- Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 4 of 4 ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105 EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Cela\Ia:7a\I 1. The use of the subject property for a convalescent/rehabilitation facility as part of a medical complex shall be in conformance with the approved exhibits and conditions of approval contained in Conditional Use Permit 20073-105 Extension 3, Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3, Tentative Parcel Map 35088 and Environmental Assessment 2006-582, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire on March 17, 2015 and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 3. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta in the event of any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's approval of this project. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. The City shall promptly notify the developer of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A THIRD TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AND A MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND FRED WARING DRIVE CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875 EXT. 3 APPLICANT: MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 71h day of May, 2013, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a third extension of time for a 104,000± square foot retail complex and 130,450± square foot medical office complex on 25+ acres located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive, more particularly described as: APN: 609-070-053 and 609-070-054 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 17`h day of March, 2009, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2009-026, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a Site Development Permit; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 3''day of May, 2011, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2011-033, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a time extension for a Site Development Permit; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 15`h day of May, 2012, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and approved by adoption Resolution 2012-024, a request by Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. for approval of a second time extension for a Site Development Permit; and, WHEREAS, the applicant, on the 11`h day of March, 2013, applied for a third time extension; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the request has been assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2008-582 prepared for this project for which an Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, nor has any new information been submitted which would trigger the Resolution 2013- Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 2 of 4 preparation of a subsequent environmental review in accordance with Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice for this request in The Desert Sun newspaper on April 26, 2013, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of the Site Development Permit time extension: 1. Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, in that the project site is designated as General Commercial, which permits and anticipates the retail and office uses as proposed. The commercial uses will therefore help achieve the goal and permitted uses of the General Commercial designation. 2. Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 is consistent with the La Quinta Zoning Code in that it proposes commercial uses permitted under the Community Commercial ("CC") zoning designation. The project's proposed uses are consistent with the uses identified in the CC district and have been designed or are conditioned to comply with the development standards of the CC district and other Zoning Code requirements such as parking, setbacks, building heights, and landscaping. 3. Processing and approval of Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Community Development Department has determined that the time extension request has been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2008-582 prepared for this project for which an Environmental Impact Report was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. 4. The architectural design of Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3, including, but not limited to the architectural style, scale, building mass, Resolution 2013- Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 3 of 4 materials, colors, architectural details, roof style, and other architectural elements, are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. The proposed Desert Contemporary architectural style, which incorporates flat roofs, stone veneer, metal canopies, and earth tone colors, is internally consistent in architectural design and materials used throughout the project site. 5. The site design of Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3, including, but not limited to project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian amenities, and other site design elements will be compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. Although the multiple access points along Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive may present some circulation issues, a number of traffic -related mitigation measures to reduce circulation impacts were included as part of the environmental review of the project. 6. Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 landscaping, including but not limited to the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials is designed and conditioned so as to provide relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, and provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses. The project will serve to establish an overall unifying influence, enhance the visual continuity of the project, complement the surrounding project area and comply with City and Coachella Valley Water District water efficiency requirements, ensuring efficient water use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta. California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; 2. The Environmental Impact Report for the project was certified on March 17, 2009. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed, nor has any new information been submitted, which would trigger the preparation of a subsequent environmental review in accordance with Section 15162 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and 3. That it does hereby approve a third time extension to March 17, 2015 for Resolution 2013- Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. Adopted: Page 4 of 4 Site Development Permit 2006-875, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 71h day of May, 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DON ADOLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENSON, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The Site Development Permit shall expire on March 17, 2015 and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 3. Site Development Permit 2006-875 Extension 3 shall comply with all applicable conditions for the following related approvals: Tentative Parcel Map 31876 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 2 of 30 • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • Sun Line Transit Agency • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley • State Water Resources Control Board The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.1 70 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2008-0001 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 3 of 30 B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Master HOA Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 6. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 8. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 4 of 30 easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant shall submit an "AUTHORIZATION TO REMOVE GRAFFITI FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY" form located at the Public Works Department Counter prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 9. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 1 1 . The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial, 1 20' ROW) — The standard 60 feet from the centerline of Washington Street for a total 1 20-foot ultimate developed right of way except an additional variable right of way dedication on Washington Street: a) at the intersection of Fred Waring Drive to provide for three southbound through lanes (existing), a dual southbound left turn lanes to eastbound Fred Waring Drive (existing), a three foot wide raised median, three northbound lanes consisting of a 13-foot wide inside lane, a 12-foot wide middle lane, a 13-foot wide curb lane and a 9-foot wide RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 5 of 30 parkway as approved by the City Engineer, and b) a 1 2-foot deceleration/right turn only lane at the Southerly Entry to extend south toward the intersection of Fred Waring Drive to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS and as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned conditions, the applicant or his design professional shall properly align said improvements with existing laneage to the south of the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive intersection as required by the City Engineer. 2) Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial, 1 20' ROW) — The standard 60 feet from the centerline of Fred Waring Drive for a total 1 20-foot ultimate developed right of way except an additional variable right of way dedication on Fred Waring Drive: a) at the intersection of Washington Street to provide for a 1 2- foot parkway, 12-foot deceleration/right turn only lane, three westbound through lanes, a dual westbound left turn lanes to southbound Washington Street, and a raised median as approved by the City Engineer. The proposed right of way shall be measured 75 feet north of the centerline of Fred Waring Drive as shown on the approved Site Plan for this Site Development Permit and as approved by the City Engineer. b) for a deceleration/right turn only lane at the westerly most driveway on Fred Waring Drive to provide measured 87 feet north of the centerline of Fred Waring Drive for a length of 248 feet plus storage length and a transition taper of an additional 150 feet (or length as approved by the City Engineer) to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. c) for a deceleration/right turn only lane at the easterly most driveway on Fred Waring Drive as approved by the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 6 of 30 3) Palm Royale Drive (Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 27131 - Collector Street, 72' ROW) — Street right of way has been dedicated with recorded Parcel Map 27131. No additional right of way is required to comply with General Plan street widths, except an additional variable right of way dedication 1) at the northerly limits of the Parcel Map of 44 feet from the centerline to align with Palm Royale Drive right-of-way at the Desert Sands Unified School District boundary and to transition as required to 36 feet from the centerline at the Rome Drive intersection and 2) on Palm Royale Drive at the Fred Waring Drive intersection measured 42 feet west of the centerline to accommodate one left turn lane, one through lane and one right turn lane and as conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 12. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement 13. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Site Development Permit prior to approval of grading, dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 14. The applicant shall offer for dedication a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all public streets. Additional on -site utility easements shall be dedicated for this Site Development Permit approval as required by the utility purveyors. 15. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 7 of 30 A. Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Palm Royale Drive (Collector Street) - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the associated Final Map. 17. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street, Fred Waring Drive and Palm Royale Drive from lots with frontage along Washington Street, Fred Waring Drive and Palm Royale Drive is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Plan, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final parcel map. 18. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 19. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 20. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial; 120' R/W): RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 8 of 30 Widen the east side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Site Development Permit boundary to its ultimate width on the east side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. The east curb face shall be located fifty one feet (51') east of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) at the intersection of Fred Waring Drive to provide for three southbound through lanes (existing), a dual southbound left turn lanes to eastbound Fred Waring Drive (existing), a raised median, three northbound lanes consisting of a 13- foot wide inside lane, an 12-foot wide middle lane, a 13- foot wide curb lane and a 9-foot wide parkway as approved by the City Engineer, and b) a 1 2-foot deceleration/right turn only lane at the Southerly Entry to extend south toward the intersection of Fred Waring Drive and as approved by the City Engineer. Pursuant to the aforementioned conditions, the applicant shall submit plans and construct improvements south of Fred Waring Drive to align with and safely transition to the improvements in a) and b) above as required by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Washington Street right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, d) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5 feet of the perimeter wall RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 9 of 30 at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. Said sidewalk shall be separated from curb a minimum distance of 1 foot. e) Reconstruct the existing 14 - foot wide raised landscaped median at the Primary Access Drive Aisle on Washington Street to provide for left turn movement into the Primary Access Driveway while restricting left turn movement out of the Primary Access Driveway and left turn movement out of Calle Las Brisas on the westerly side of Washington Street as approved by the City Engineer. f) Design and construct traffic signal interconnect improvements along the project frontage to include conduit, pull boxes and other appurtenances for the interconnection of the traffic signals. g) Establish a benchmark in the Washington Street right of way and file a record of the benchmark with the County of Riverside. h) Relocate the Sun Line Transit Agency Bus Stop and Shelter as required to incorporate the Sun Line Transit Agency requirements within the proposed deceleration lane. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the property boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 2) Fred Waring Drive (Major Arterial; 120' R/W): Widen the north side of Fred Waring Drive along all frontages adjacent to the Site Development Permit boundary to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. The north curb face shall be located fifty one feet (51') north of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) at the intersection of Washington Street to provide for a 1 2- foot parkway, 12-foot deceleration/right turn only lane, three westbound through lanes, a dual westbound left turn lanes to southbound Washington Street, and a raised RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 10 of 30 median as approved by the City Engineer. The proposed right of way shall be measured 75 feet north of the centerline of Fred Waring Drive as shown on the approved Site Plan for this Site Development Permit and as approved by the City Engineer. b) for a deceleration/right turn only lane at the westerly most driveway on Fred Waring Drive to provide measured 87 feet north of the centerline of Fred Waring Drive for a length of 248 feet plus storage length and a transition taper of an additional 150 feet or length as approved by the City Engineer. c) For a deceleration/right turn only lane at the easterly most driveway on Fred Waring Drive to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Fred Waring Drive right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: d) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, e) An 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that either touches the back of curb or approaches within five feet of the curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5 feet of the perimeter wall at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. Said sidewalk shall be separated from curb a minimum distance of 1 foot. f) A 14 - foot wide raised landscaped median along the entire boundary of the Site Development Permit plus variable width as needed to accommodate 1) a raised median for the dual left turn pockets for the eastbound traffic of Fred Waring Drive to southbound Washington Street and left turn RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 11 of 30 in movements at Palm Royale Drive. g) Reconstruct the raised median at the shared drive aisle at Parcels 5 and 10 for a left turn deceleration lane with a left turn out restrictor for a length and taper up to the dual left turn lanes at the Fred Waring Drive and Washington Street intersection as approved by the City Engineer. h) Modification of the existing traffic signal at the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive intersection as required by the abovementioned improvements and as approved by the City Engineer and the City of Palm Desert. Applicant shall submit plans and fees required for the City of Palm Desert concurrent approval. i) Class II Bike Lane as approved by the City Engineer. 3) Palm Royale Drive (Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 27131 - Collector Street, 72' ROW): Widen the west side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Site Development Permit boundary to its ultimate width on the west side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. The west curb face shall be located twenty four feet (24') west of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) Transitional street width required from 32 feet at the northerly boundary adjacent to the Colonel Mitchell Page Middle School to 24 feet at Rome Drive as approved by the City Engineer. b) A deceleration/right turn only lane on Palm Royale at the Fred Waring Drive intersection. The west curb face shall be located thirty two (32') west of the centerline and length to be as approved by the City Engineer to extend from the Access Drive across Rome Drive to Fred Waring Drive. to accommodate one left turn lane, one through lane and one right turn lane, Other required improvements in the Palm Royale Drive right-of-way RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 12 of 30 and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs, d) 6-foot wide sidewalk with a planter next to the curb. e) Class II Bike Lane to connect with the existing Bike Lane to the north and as required by the City Engineer. f) The applicant is responsible for 25 % share of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Royale Drive and Fred Waring Drive to be installed by the City of La Quinta with the CIP 2007-06 Project. Additionally, the applicant is responsible to design and construct all traffic signal interconnect equipment including pull boxes, conduit and other appurtenances along the project frontage for the interconnection of this traffic signal with the existing traffic signal at the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive intersection. g) The applicant shall install interconnect/loop conduits as required. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the parcel map boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 21. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Major Arterial 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 22. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 13 of 30 The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 23. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Washington Street 1) Primary Access Drive (between Parcel 1 and 2): Right turn movements in and out and left turn movements in are permitted. Left turn movement out is prohibited. 2) Secondary Access Drive (northerly end of Site Development Permit): Right turn movements in and out are permitted. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. B. Fred Waring Drive 1) Service Access Drive: Right turn movements in and out and left turn movements in are permitted. Left turn movements out are prohibited. 2) Westerly most driveway: Right turn movements in and out turn movements are permitted. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. 3) Secondary most easterly Access Drive: Right turn movements in and out are permitted. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. C. Palm Royale Drive 1) Access Drive across Rome Drive: Full turn movements are permitted. 24. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 14 of 30 25. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 26. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 (Parking). In particular, the following are conditioned with this approval. A. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to better evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. E. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with egress drive aisles a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. F. Drive-thru aisles shall be a minimum of 12 feet along straight away portions and increased to a minimum 14 feet at bends (to accommodate turning movements). The minimum dimensions shall be paved roadway surface. Additionally for the drive-thru proposed at Building 10, a seven - car minimum stacking capacity is required from the order window to the drive-thru entrance off of the east -west drive aisle or as approved by the City Engineer. Additionally, the applicant shall construct signage and pavement markings to prevent vehicles blocking this east -west drive aisle as approved by the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 15 of 30 G. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. Site Plan dated January 14, 2009 requires additional revisions based on Public Works Department plan review of said Site Plan. 27. General access points and turning movements of traffic to off -site public streets are limited to the access locations approved for Parcel Map No. 35088 and these conditions of approval. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 16 of 30 by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 32. The applicant is required to eliminate parking stalls along the main entry drive aisle along the Primary Entry off of Washington Street up to Building 5 as shown on the Site Plan dated January 14, 2009 and as approved by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant is required to redesign the parking lot layout between Buildings 4 and 5 as required by the City Engineer. 34. The applicant is required to address the westerly edge of the westerly parking stalls adjacent to Office Building 11 as approved by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refers to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 35. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 36. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. SWPPP 1" = 40' Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 17 of 30 E. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical F. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal G. Washington Street/Fred Waring Drive Traffic Signal Modification Plan 1 " = 20' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. H. Traffic Signal Interconnect Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal I. Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal NOTE: E through I to be submitted concurrently. Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1- foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. The applicant shall prepare an accessibility assessment on a marked up print of the building floor plan identifying every building egress and notes the 2010 California Building Code accessibility requirements associated with each door. The assessment must comply with submittal requirements of the Building & Safety Department. A copy of the reviewed assessment shall be submitted to RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 18 of 30 the Public Works Department in conjunction with the Site Development Plan when it is submitted for plan checking. In addition to the normal set of improvement plans, a "Precise Grading" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official and the City Engineer. "Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 37. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la-guinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 38. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 39. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 40. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off - site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 19 of 30 required by the City. 41. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Site Development Permit, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 42. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured through a SIA, prior to the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 43. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements required for development of this project, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Site Development Permit. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 20 of 30 D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these means, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the first building occupancy. In the event that any of the improvements which this project is conditioned to provide required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the project's proportionate share of the costs of such improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 44. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off -site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule adopted by City resolution, or ordinance. For items not listed in the City's unit cost schedule, the proposed unit costs shall be approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1/2" x 11" reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1/2" x 11" Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. Ce1:TAI91101N9 45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 46. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 21 of 30 the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 47. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.1 6, (Fugitive Dust Control), LQMC, and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES stormwater discharge permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), LQMC. E. WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform to the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a soils engineer, or by an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 48. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 49. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the back slope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 22 of 30 exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1 . All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1 .5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 50. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the Site Development Permit, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 51. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 52. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus five tenths of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Site Plan for this Site Development Permit, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance review. 53. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 54. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site plus offsite RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 23 of 30 water to the street centerline tributary area during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. Retention volume requirements are documented in the MSA October 15, 2006 Hydrology Report to equal 8.18 acre-feet. 55. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-1 6 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 56. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 57. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blow off water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 58. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 59. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 60. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 61. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 24 of 30 62. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 63. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 64. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001 . a. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001 . b. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2008-001 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. c. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. i1rrurrixy 65. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 25 of 30 66. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 67. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. CONSTRUCTION 68. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. Temporary occupancy permits, for the purpose of allowing fixture interior improvements will be allowed. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 69. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 70. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots areas. 71. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians and retention basins shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 72. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for preliminary approval by the Community Development Department and green sheet sign off by the Public Works Department. After plan checking has been completed by the Community Development Department, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the Community Development Director, however landscape plans for landscaped median on public streets shall be approved by the both the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. Where City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 26 of 30 approval is not required, the applicant shall submit for a green sheet approval by the Public Works Department. Final irrigation and landscape plans for on -site planting shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of first building permit. Final plans shall include all landscaping associated with this project. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by both the Community Development Director and/or the City Engineer. 73. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Community Development Director. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public streets. 74. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 51h Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 75. In both the medical complex and commercial complex diamond shaped tree planters and/or regular planters shall be provided between head of parking spaces and buildings or in adjacent sidewalks to provide code required parking lot shading and soften the buildings appearance. PUBLIC SERVICES 76. The applicant shall provide and/or modify public transit improvements as required by Sun Line Transit Agency and as approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 77. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 78. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, and sidewalks. The applicant will prepare and submit documentation that "runs with the land" for approval by the City Engineer and City Attorney for this continuous and perpetual maintenance obligation. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 27 of 30 FEES AND DEPOSITS 79. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits), LQMC. These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 80. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the Development Impact Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 81. The applicant shall pay the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee, in accordance with Chapter 3.34 of the Municipal Code. 82. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation fee program (TUMF) in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). MISCELLANEOUS 83. The commercial complex and medical office complex projects may be considered separate projects for plan checking purposes. 84. An exterior lighting plan (parking lot, carports, walkway, building, landscaping) shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval prior to issuance of first building permit. A photometric study for the parking lot shall be included with the lighting plan complying with Zoning Code Section 9.100.150. Parking lot fixture height shall not exceed 20' above parking lot grade. Side shielding of fixtures shall be provided on all perimeter parking lot fixtures and any other fixture that may glare onto adjacent residential properties, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Carport lighting shall be recessed and not readily visible from the side view. Parking lot lights shall be dimmed or partially turned off to "night mode" within one hour of closing. Dimmed lights shall be at a level to maintain safety. 85. Sign programs for each complex shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval and comply with the requirements of Zoning Code Chapter 9.160. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 28 of 30 86. The parking lot perimeter shall be screened from view of public streets through the use of +3' berming and/or 3'-6" high decorative masonry wall to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 87. Prior to submission of first plan check of architectural, improvement plan, precise plan or grading plan, the applicant shall submit the plans to the Fire Marshal for their review and approval. 88. Height, design and location for all trash enclosures and loading screen walls shall be approved by the Community Development Director during plan check of working drawings. 89. The carport design for the medical complex shall be compatible in design, material and color to the approved buildings. Preliminary design plans for the carport shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. The Community Development Director may approve the plans or have the discretion to forward them to the Planning Commission for consideration as a business item. 90. Medical complex buildings 1 1 , 12, 13 and 15 shall be architecturally consistent (including design, material and color) with approved building 14. Preliminary plans for buildings 11, 12, 13 and 15 shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. The Director may approve the plans or have the discretion to forward them to the Planning Commission for consideration as a business item. 91. Height of Buildings 11 and 12 shall be no higher than 22' (except limited tower elements) as stipulated in the Image Corridor requirements. 92. The medical complex water feature shall be re -designed to be more water efficient, use less energy, and be more interactive with the general public, pedestrians, and other people using the facilities. The final plans for the water feature shall be included in the final landscaping plans submitted to the City and shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as a business item prior to approval by the Community Development Director. 93. The two story high windows of the medical complex shall be provided with solar protection for summer sun to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 94. A sample or detailed photographs of the roof equipment screen material for the medical complex shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 29 of 30 approval at the time of working drawing plan check. 95. The planters in areas adjacent to the school building grounds shall be heavily planted with canopy trees (minimum 36" box, 2.5" caliper) to provide a visual screen of the commercial complex. All planters along north property line shall be a minimum 10 feet wide to accommodate trees and planting. 96. Design and location plans for all cart returns within the parking lot shall be approved by the Community Development Director. 97. Plans for building 1 of the commercial complex shall be architecturally compatible the other commercial complex buildings. Preliminary plans for the building shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. The Director may approval the plans or have the discretion to forward them to the Planning Commission for consideration as a business item. 98. A palette of designs, colors and materials for the awnings by tenant shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of first commercial complex building permit. The developer shall consider providing "awnings by tenant" as part of initial construction. 99. The proposed water feature at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive shall be removed and, in its place, an art piece shall be explored, as part of the City's Art in Public Places Program. 100. All mechanical equipment shall be screened to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 101. All applicable requirements of CUP 2007-105 Extension 3 and TPM 35088 shall be complied with. 102. All mitigation measures contained in the Final Environmental Impact (EIR) Report for EA 2006-582 shall be complied with. Said EIR is on file in the Community Development Department of the City of La Quinta. 103. Adjacent to the east side of Building 13 of the Medical Complex, substantial landscaping shall be provided to screen and soften the building 104. The applicant shall consider eliminating parking spaces in each complex to provide additional pedestrian -friendly outdoor public spaces and a pedestrian scale fountain(s). Areas provided shall be included in the final landscaping plans. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, EXTENSION 3 MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Recommended: May 7, 2013 Page 30 of 30 105. The applicant shall, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, comply with all recommendations contained within the Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management Study for the Washington Street and Highway 111 Corridors. ATTACHMENT # 1 0 c&t�t 4 e(P QK&M �y OF COUNCHJRDA MEETING DATE: March 17, 2009 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolutions for: 1) Certification of Environmental Impact Report for Environmental Assessment 2008-582, Adoption of Findings Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, Adoption of Statement of Overriding Consideration, Adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Program for an Environmental Impact Report, 2) Approval of Site Development Permit 2006-875 to Allow a Retail Complex and Medical Office Complex on 25 + Acres with Approximately 234,450 t Square Feet of Building Area, 3) Approval of Conditional Use Permit 2007-105 and 4) Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 35088 to Divide the Site into 10 Parcels (with 5 Lots for Condominium Purposes) for Property Located on the North Side of Fred Waring Drive, between Washington Street and Palm Royale Drive Applicant: Mayer Villa Capri, L.P. RECOMMENDATION: AGENDA CATEGORY: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2007121009) including adoption of CEQA Findings and Statement of Facts, and Statement of Overriding Considerations for Environmental Assessment 2006-582. 2. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2006-875, subject to Conditions. 3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2006-105, subject to Conditions. 4. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 35088, subject to Conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None 64� CHARTER CITY IMPLICATIONS: None BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North: CO (Commercial Office), CC (Community Commercial) / vacant land and public middle school South: RL (Low Density Residential)/ country club development East: RL (Low Density Residential)/ Single Family Residential and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) well site West: Commercial and residential development in the City of Palm Desert Property Description and History: The property is located on the north side of Fred Waring Drive between Washington Street and Palm Royale Drive in north La Quinta (Attachment 1). The vacant site consists primarily of sand dunes and desert shrubs. A curb and sidewalk exist along Washington Street. Power poles and overhead lines also exist along the northern two-thirds of Washington Street. Improvements to Fred Waring Drive in front of the project and at the intersection with Palm Royale Drive, including signalization and raised center medians and curbs, are presently being completed. The subject property was divided into the existing 2 parcels by Parcel Map 31876 in 2003. In early 2004, Mayer Villa Capri proposed a residential subdivision consisting of 48 single family lots on the easterly 15 acre parcel. Additionally, at that time a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Community Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial was proposed for the westerly 10 acre parcel. Those applications were recommended for denial by the Planning Commission on March 23, 2004, and eventually withdrawn by the applicant prior to City Council review without any further public hearings (Attachment 2). A lot line adjustment in 2007 revised the westerly lot to 12.3 + acres and the easterly lot to 12.7 + acres. •1 5 4 Surrounding the project site to the east is the Bella Vista single family residential subdivision and a CVWD well site across Palm Royale Drive, with Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School and vacant commercial land (proposed for a self-service car wash) located to the north, a commercial office complex and Desert Breezes residential project in Palm Desert to the west across Washington Street, and Palm Royale Country Club to the south across Fred Waring Drive. The middle school to the north has installed a steel picket type fence adjacent to their play yard areas along their common boundary with the subject property. PROPOSAL: A commercial complex and medical office complex are proposed to be developed on the subject property. Mayer Villa Capri currently owns the entire site; However, the medical complex is proposed be developed and owned by a different party. The 104,000± square foot commercial complex will be constructed on the existing westerly 12.3+ acre parcel, while a 130,450± square foot medical office complex is proposed on the eastern 12.7+ acre parcel. While the projects are separate, there will be vehicular and pedestrian connection provided between the two via east -west drives and a common north -south drive adjacent to the projects common boundary connecting to Fred Waring Drive. Commercial Complex The commercial complex will consist of a market with attached retail shop spaces, a freestanding drugstore, and six additional freestanding retail buildings (Attachment 3). The 39,709 square foot market is in the northeast corner of the commercial center site with the 12,900 square foot freestanding drugstore proposed at the southwest corner. In accordance with the permitted uses identified for Community Commercial zoning district, both of these buildings require conditional use permit approval as they exceed 10,000 square feet. Four freestanding retail shops are located near Washington Street, with the two remaining freestanding shops along Fred Waring Drive. The connected shops extend from the east side of the market and run south adjacent to the east property boundary. Though shown on exterior elevations and the landscaping plans, signs will be reviewed under a separate sign program to be considered at a future date. Retention of on -site storm water will occur in three small basins as well as an underground retention system proposed underneath a portion of the parking lot. The three basins will be landscaped with low water use plants and covered with decomposed granite. The basins are located east of the drugstore, east of the market behind the attached shops, and north of Building 9. The underground retention system is just north of the building 9 basin in the parking lot. 643 Parking and Circulation: The commercial complex proposes two driveways along the Fred Waring Drive frontage and two driveways along the Washington Street frontage. The easterly driveway on Fred Waring Drive will be shared with the proposed medical office complex to the east. Offset east -west drive aisles will connect to this driveway and provide access between the commercial and medical complexes. The northern -most driveway on Washington Street, adjacent to the north boundary of the site will provide right -in and right -out access and is intended primarily to provide access for market delivery vehicles. This driveway runs along the north and east commercial complex boundaries and heads south connecting to Fred Waring Drive, essentially separating the commercial complex from the medical complex. It is anticipated that large market delivery trucks will enter the site from the northern -most Washington Street driveway, back into the market loading dock, and pull forward and exit onto Fred Waring Drive. This Fred Waring Drive driveway will provide right -in, right -out and left -in access. The southern -most driveway and main entrance on Washington Street will permit right -in, right -out and left -in access and will lead incoming traffic to the center of the commercial complex. The westerly most driveway access on Fred Waring Drive will also serve as a primary customer access to the commercial complex and will permit right -in and right -out access. The majority of customer parking is located in the center of the site between the market and drugstore. Parking is provided at a ratio of one space per 250 square feet of building area as permitted by City Code for centers of this type. The following is a summation of the parking: Parking required: 415 spaces Parking provided: 507 spaces (including handicap and 24 compact spaces) A preliminary pedestrian ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) circulation plan has been submitted to the Public Works Department to show how access to the various buildings can be achieved. In addition, pedestrian connectivity to the meandering sidewalks along Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive as well as within the project is identifed in several locations, such as at the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive intersection as well as between buildings 2 & 3, 8 & 9, and 6 & 7. Pedestrian connectivity is also provided to the medical office complex to the east. Architecture: The commercial complex is designed in a desert contemporary style of architecture, utilizing flat roofs, square edges at corners, pop -outs and recesses, varying colors of smooth plaster walls, stone veneer on towers and walls, metal canopies and 644 trellis', awnings and curved roof towers. Exterior plaster colors include up to five shades of tan to brown plus a deep green. Metal work and accents will be dark brown with the stone veneer multi earth tone colors. Curved metal roofs, where used, will be standing seam metal in a clear anodized aluminum color. No architectural plans have been submitted for retail building 1 located along Washington Street. This building will require separate review at a later date. Retail Shops: Building heights are proposed at primarily 20' for the retail shops, but some areas vary slightly. Tower structures are shown on these buildings which are several feet higher than the adjacent building walls (the highest tower being 26'-6"). These buildings utilize vertical and horizontal planes of varying colors and depths. Pop -out columns and soffits create the appearance that the windows and doors are recessed into the suite. All of these retail buildings have at least one freestanding perforated steel shade cover provided over walkway or entry areas. Along shop fronts the plans allow for awnings over most windows, which are to be decided on by the tenant when they move in. In certain areas steel trellises will be provided over windows and doors. Market: The market, located at the northeast corner of the commercial complex site, is proposed with the same architectural style, colors and materials as the retail shops. The building storefront uses smooth exterior plaster and stone veneer accents. The remaining sides are primarily exterior plaster and integral color precision block, proposed in two colors. The market height varies to a maximum 29'-6" for a small portion of the building at the entry. Much of the balance of the building varies from approximately 24' to 26' in height. A covered two lane drive -through pharmacy window is provided on the northwest end of the building. A screened delivery dock and trash enclosure is provided at the rear of the building. Drugstore: A drugstore is proposed near the intersection of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and has been designed consistent in architecture, colors and material with the other buildings in the center. The primary building height is 22' with towers extending up to a maximum 27'-6" at the store entry. A covered two lane drive -through pharmacy window is provided on the east side of the building. A screened delivery dock and trash enclosure is located on the north side of the building. Medical Office Complex The proposed medical office complex will consist of five freestanding buildings on 645 12.7+ acres, with the northern three buildings proposed to be two stories and the southern two buildings closest to Fred Waring Drive proposed at one story (Attachment 4). Specific design detail has only been provided for one building (building 14) at this time. The total building square footage of the complex will be 130,450 square feet, with the center two-story "flagship" building (building 14) being the largest at 44,850 square feet. Signs will be reviewed under a separate sign program at a future date. A convalescent/rehabilitation facility is proposed to be located in the "flagship" building. The facility will provide elective surgeries, primarily for joint repair and similar operations and would include a maximum of 50 private suite rehabilitation rooms, capable of accommodating both long and short term rehabilitation patients. In addition to the beds, the facility will include a dietary/cafeteria space, one or more gym/rehabilitation rooms, therapy pools and nursing stations. The operating room in the facility is designed for elective outpatient surgeries. Total staffing is not yet known. It has yet to be determined if the facility will use all of the building space. If it does not, other medical offices will occupy the balance of the building. This facility requires a Conditional Use Permit in the Community Commercial zone, which has been applied for and is included in your review. The applicant has identified that in addition to the convalescent/rehabilitation facility the balance of the buildings in the complex are expected to contain sports medicine outpatient surgical facilities, medical office space, dialysis, orthopedic offices, family practices and various other specialists. Retention of on -site storm -water will be provided in a large basin at the northeast corner of the site and in an adjacent underground retention system underneath a portion of the parking lot. The unfenced basin will be landscaped with low water use plants and covered with decomposed granite. Parking and Circulation: The medical complex will have one driveway along the Palm Royale Drive frontage and two driveways along Fred Waring Drive, the westerly one being the aforementioned drive to be shared with the commercial complex. The easterly Fred Waring Drive driveway, which will provide right -in and right -out access, leads to the front door of the "flagship" medical building where a circular drive with an entry water feature in the center and drop off area and several close handicap parking spaces are shown. The circular drive intersects an east -west drive that provides access to Palm Royale Drive to the east and the commercial complex to the west. The driveway on Palm Royale Drive will be a full turn access and align with Rome Drive to the east. Rome Drive provides access to the adjacent Bella Vista residential neighborhood. 5 06 Parking for the medical complex is required at the convalescent hospital requirement of one space per four beds for the 44,850 square foot convalescent/rehabilitation facility and one space per 200 square feet of the first 2,000 medical office square footage plus one space per 175 square feet of the balance of the medical office square footage over 2,000 square feet. Using these ratios, the parking required and provided is: Parking required: 483 spaces Parking provided: 717 spaces (including handicap and six compact spaces) The site plan was originally designed for the entire project to be medical offices only. This requires more parking than a project with a convalescent facility. When the 44,850 square foot convalescent/rehabilitation facility was added to the project, the parking lot plan was not revised. Therefore, a large number of excess parking spaces remain. They are provided in case the convalescent/rehabilitation facility leaves and the space is converted back to medical offices. The applicant has also noted that a similar convalescent/rehabilitation facility in Rancho Mirage provides two parking spaces per bed, which would increase the required parking from 13 to 100 spaces for this 50 bed facility. Buildings proposed for office use require a minimum thirty percent of the parking spaces be covered by a carport or trellis. The plan proposes 30% of the spaces be covered, with carports located near each building. However, the majority of the carports are located north and west of the central building. Architecture: Architectural plans for the medical complex buildings focus on and are limited to the main "flagship" 44,850 square feet two-story building. This medical building is designed in a desert contemporary style of architecture utilizing similar architectural features as the retail complex. Exterior colors and materials will be consistent with those proposed in the commercial complex. Metal work and accents, including a curved standing seam metal roof over the tower feature, are to be clear anodized aluminum color, with a stone veneer face on the tower. Entries are provided on all four sides of the building with the main entry facing Fred Waring Drive where the water feature and circular drive are shown. On the south side of the building, following the curve of the circular drive and adjacent to the front door is a covered arcade over the sidewalk. The building parapet is proposed at 30' high, which is lower than the 40' maximum height allowed in the Community Commercial zone. Inside of the parapet wall and mounted to the roof will be a painted louvered equipment screen which will add an ,. G47 additional four feet of height to the structure. This screen is set approximately 10 feet behind the exterior walls of the building. In addition to providing a necessary screen for the roof equipment, the applicant has also identified that the screen is designed to be an integral architectural feature of the building. A tower (with the curved metal roof) over the north and south building entries will have a parapet wall height of 30 feet, screen wall height of 34 feet, with a maximum height of 43 feet at the entry tower. Plans for the carports have not been submitted, but the applicant has indicated they will be compatible with the desert contemporary architectural style and materials used for the medical buildings. The applicant has submitted a rendering and cross section drawings to show the relative relationships between the northeasterly two story medical office building (Building 13) and the four closest homes that back up to Palm Royale Drive north of Rome Drive. The drawings indicate the 34 foot high (including mechanical screening) office building would vary from approximately 198-238 feet away from the back wall of the neighboring homes to the east. Because of the height of the existing rear yard perimeter wall of the homes and their lower pad grades along Palm Royale Drive the first three homes north of Rome Drive should not see the future two story medical building across the street. As one moves north (from the fourth home north of Rome Drive and beyond), due to the lower perimeter wall height, the building will be seen. Landscape Design (both complexes) A landscape plan for the entire site has been submitted showing specific trees and shrub types (In Attachments 3 and 4). The plan includes a plant palette with sizes for the project. Trees are shown at 24" to 36" box size (with a minimum 2" caliper), with Date Palms at 14' and Mexican Fan Palms at 25' high. Shrubs are shown at 15, five and one gallon sizes (some grasses at one gallon) with groundcovers at five and one gallon size. The landscape design is desertscape in nature with no use of turf indicated. Decomposed granite or gravel will be used in all planters for groundcover. Additionally, landscape plan details are provided for the area around buildings 2-4 of the commercial complex (Attachment 3) and the area around the proposed medical building entry with its proposed water feature (Attachment 4). Along the Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive perimeters an 8' wide meandering sidewalk is shown. Along Palm Royale Drive, a 6' wide sidewalk is shown with a 6' wide planter located between the sidewalk and curb. At the corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive a fountain -type water feature is proposed. Planted retention basins are shown at the northeast corner of the medical complex site adjacent to Palm Royale Drive, and in the commercial 648 complex to the east of building 10, to the southeast of the market and in the triangular area north of building 9. In front of the medical complex "flagship" building's main entry, south of the circular driveway, an oblong shaped waterfall style water feature is proposed surrounded by planting and the circular drive. Decorative paving is also proposed in the circular drive area of this entry and at the aisle crossing to the south in the main driveway leading to Fred Waring Drive. Water fountain and paver details have not been provided to date. Exterior Lighting (both complexes) Typical parking lot lighting will be provided for both commercial projects. This will consist of standard box fixtures on a pole. Lighting will be provided for the carports in the medical complex. No specific fixture details or photometric plans have been submitted to date. Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map proposes to divide the existing two lots into 10 parcels (Attachment 5). Five parcels would be created for the commercial complex with five parcels for the medical complex. In the commercial complex the market and drugstore will each be on a separate parcel with the balance of the three retail buildings on the remaining three parcels. Street perimeters are shown as part of the parcel they are adjacent to and not as common parcels. Each of the five medical complex buildings will be on an individual parcel. The interior parcel lines between the parcels will run down the middle of the driveways surrounding the buildings. The retention basin at the northeast corner of the site and street perimeters are included within the parcels versus being identified as common area lots. The applicant has indicated that all or some medical buildings may be sold as condominiums. Therefore, the five medical complex parcels are identified for condominium purposes. PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW Staff transmitted a copy of the applicant's project request to responsible public agencies. All agency comments received have been made part of the Conditions of Approval for this case to the extent they are applicable. PUBLIC NOTICE The proposed project applications were advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on 649 February 13, 2009 for the February 24, 2009 Planning Commission hearing and on March 6, 2009 for this City Council hearing. One written comment was received prior to the Planning Commission hearing (Attachment 6), and to date none have been received for the City Council hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Draft Environmental Impact Report A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared, consistent with CEQA requirements (previously passed out to the City Council). The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency and has the authority for preparation and certification of the DEIR. The DEIR includes a detailed project description and a description of the environmental setting of this project. The DEIR addresses the topics of Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Soils and Geology, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services and Utilities, Recreational Resources, Transportation and Traffic. Potentially significant impacts were identified with respect to Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Noise, and Transportation. With the adoption of the mitigation measures proposed in the Draft EIR, the majority of the project impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels. However, a number of traffic impacts and temporary air quality impacts (during the construction phases) remain significant after mitigation measures are required. A number of traffic related mitigation measures are included in the DEIR to reduce impacts associated with the proposed project (page III-111 of the DEIR). However, even with these mitigation measures some impacts cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels. Those are: 1. In 2010 the implementation of the proposed project will result in traffic impacts which cannot be mitigated (page M-12 of the DEIR). This is due to the fact that street improvements, such as adding a turn lane, cannot be feasibly accomplished at the following intersections: A. Washington Street at Hovley Lane B. Adams Street at Fred Waring Drive C. Washington Street at Miles Avenue D. Washington Street at Highway 111 E. Washington Street and Avenue 48 2. In 2020 cumulative impacts associated with build out of the General Plan standards will be unmitigatable. To mitigate these impacts widening Washington Street from Hovley Drive to Avenue 48, Fred Waring Drive west 650 of Washington Street, and Highway 111 east of Washington Street to eight lanes would need to be done. This is not deemed feasible due to existing development along the streets. CEQA requires an alternatives analysis as part of the EIR process. Four alternatives were identified for consideration in the DEIR: 1) No Project (required); 2) General Plan Build Out/All Retail Development; 3) Reduced Intensity Alternative; and 4) Alternate Land Use Mix Alternative. Analysis of each of these alternatives is detailed in Section V of the DEIR. Only the no project alternative would result in significantly fewer impacts. However, traffic impacts with this alternative would still be significant and unavoidable due to regional traffic growth and cumulative projects in the area. This alternative would not accomplish any of the applicant's project goals. The other alternatives would achieve some of the applicant's project goals, but all would result in significant and unavoidable traffic impacts. Additionally, any of the development alternatives would result in short term grading and construction air quality impacts. CEQA allows public agencies to make findings to approval projects, despite the fact that certain potentially significant adverse environmental impacts identified in the DEIR are not mitigated to a level of insignificance. To do so, the Agency must state in writing the reasons to support its action based upon the EIR and any information in the public record. Such a written statement is called a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) and requires Council consideration and adoption should the Council wish to approve the project. Final EIR and Comments Received on the Draft EIR The DEIR was circulated for public review as required by CEQA with the comment period ending February 27, 2009, three days after the February 24 Planning Commission hearing. Therefore, comments on the DEIR received by the deadline, including at the Planning Commission hearing are included in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (Attachment 7). The Planning Commission considered the information in the DEIR in making its recommendations to the City Council. Certification of the FEIR is an action to be considered by the City Council. The following comments were received from agencies and interested parties during the public review period: 1. Riverside County Fire Department 2. Coachella Valley Water District 3. Time Warner Cable 4. Native American Heritage Commission 5. Riverside County Transportation Commission 6. The Robert Mayer Corporation 7. Department of Toxic Substances Control 651 8. Regional Water Quality Control Board Responses to these comments have been prepared and are part of the Final Environmental Impact Report. The Fire Department provided several general comments pertaining to fire planning, services and requirements, as well as one correction to the DEIR text pertaining to fire standards. Comments from the Coachella Valley Water District only include two corrections to the DEIR text pertaining to water resources. The applicant questioned the air quality mitigation measure (MM 3) requiring all structures within the proposed project shall demonstrate energy efficiency which exceeds the standards of Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code by 20%. This mitigation measure was included in the EIR to address greenhouse gases and global warming. Although there are no thresholds established for greenhouse gases as of yet, the City is required to work towards reducing its greenhouse gas emissions 1990 levels. While no uniform threshold of significance has been officially adopted in California, numerous proposed thresholds have been developed. The greenhouse gas emission from this project [7.458 metric tons of combined carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year at build out, not including construction emissions] would be above some of the lower thresholds and below some of the higher proposed thresholds. The suggested thresholds of significance range from a low of 900 metric tons per year of CO2e (the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association suggested threshold) to a high of 38,477 metric tons per year (the San Joaquin Valley Pollution Control District adopted standard). The SCAQMD has adopted a threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year, but requires the inclusion of construction emissions amortized over 30 years. The City has not adopted a specific numeric threshold. However, City Staff and its environmental consultant believe that the CO2e emissions from the operation of this project are large enough that they warrant specific reduction efforts. Currently, the site produces no CO2e emissions as it is undeveloped. The project as proposed will increase greenhouse gas emissions, and although the impact is not been labeled "significant," this in part is because La Quinta had not adopted a numeric threshold. For this reason, reductions should be applied wherever possible to meet the State mandated targets. The 20% reduction is consistent with guidelines being published, and other legislation and programs being implemented in California to reduce greenhouse gases. As there is no threshold established, the 20% recommended an alternate mitigation measure is recommended as follows: "Unless determined to be an unreasonable hardship by the City Planning Director, all structures shall exceed the minimum standards set forth in the 2007 California Energy Code (Title 24, 652 Part 6/ by 20%. if it is determined by the Planning Director that compliance with this measure creates an unreasonable hardship, the measure may be reduced to the highest level determined feasible by the Planning Director but in no case shall it be reduced below the minimum standard set forth by the California Energy Code in effect at the time of building permit submittal. " Staff envisions including a similar standard in the General Plan during the next update. This revision will allow the project to be constructed even if the 20% reduction in energy consumption is not reached as long as it shown that a valid attempt has been made. This change in the mitigation measure would not significantly change the intent of the measure, would not represent a significant change in the analysis or conclusions of the EIR, and would not require recirculation of the document. Other comments were general or standard in nature and are included as noted items. CEQA Findings and Statement of Facts The California Environmental Quality Act and particularly the CEQA Guidelines require that: "No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects on the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid, or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives identified in the final EIR." In short, CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or alternatives, where feasible, to avoid or mitigate significant environmental impacts 653 that would otherwise occur with implementation of the Project. Project mitigation or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying the project lies with another agency. For those significant effects that cannot be mitigated to a less -than -significant level, the public agency is required to find that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment. The Guidelines state in Section 15093 that: "If the specific economic, social, technological, or other benefits of a propos[ed] project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable." The required CEQA Findings and Statement of Facts for the Proposed Project are incorporated into the City Council Resolution for the Final Environmental Impact Report 2008-582 as Exhibit "B." Benefits of Implementing the Proposed Project and Statement of Overriding Considerations CEQA requires the City as Lead Agency, to balance the benefits of the proposed Project against its unavoidable significant adverse impacts, and to determine whether the Project related significant impacts can be acceptably overridden by the Project benefits when the impacts and benefits are compared and balanced. The proposed Project is anticipated to cause Project specific or contribute to cumulative unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts as described the EIR. The required CEQA Statement of Overriding Considerations is incorporated into the City Council Resolution for the Final Environmental Impact Report 2008-582 as Exhibit "A." The benefits of the proposed Project resulting from the implementation of the proposed Project, as detailed in Exhibit "A," outweigh the Project specific and cumulative unavoidable adverse environmental effects. The benefits from approving the proposed Project, as outlined below and in Exhibit "A", can be considered by the City Council in performing the balancing test with those unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts previously described. The following benefits can be found to outweigh and make acceptable the unavoidable significant adverse impacts of the proposed Project as described in the Final EIR, this document and other information in the record. Each benefit can constitute an overriding consideration warranting approval of the Project, independent of other benefits, despite each and every unavoidable impact. Expansion of retail, commercial and service opportunities - Implementation of the Project will enhance the retail and service experience for costumers and clients, and attract new businesses to the City, which will promote investment and create new employment opportunities within the City of La Quinta. The Project will add 654 to the total square footage of community retail and medical office space in the City needed to achieve the benchmarks in the Economic Development Plan; the Project anticipates building 104,000 square feet of retail and 130,450 square feet of medical office space. Enhancement of retail and service experience and expansion of employment opportunities - The Project will enhance the quality of life in the City of La Quinta by enhancing the retail and service experience as well as promoting investment and creating new employment opportunities in La Quinta associated with retail and medical office businesses. Sales tax revenue and fees - The Project would generate development that will contribute to future sales tax revenues and Development Impact (DIF) Fees for the City of La Quinta. The DIF Fees will contribute to implementation of the public infrastructure improvements included in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Expansion of and proximity to professional services - The Project will provide opportunity for additional conveniently located professional services in La Quinta. The rehabilitation facility will allow opportunity for La Quinta residents to utilize such services locally. In conclusion, the benefits identified, collectively and individually, outweigh the unavoidable, Project specific and cumulative significant unavoidable adverse impacts. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission considered this request at their meeting of February 24, 2009 (Attachment 8). One person from the Bella Vista neighborhood spoke. The resident lives on the east side of Milan Court, which is one block east of Palm Royale Drive and commented that he felt his view to the west would be detrimentally affected by the construction of the medical complex. The major concerns brought up by the applicant focused upon the recommended conditions of approval that called for Building 13 of the medical center to be limited to one story rather than two stories as proposed, the requirement for a city entry sign at the Fred Waring Drive and Washington Street intersection and the requirement for tower height of the drugstore be limited to not exceed 26 feet. The applicant also expressed concern with the mitigation measure identified in the DEIR relevant to greenhouse gas emissions. The measure as written in the DEIR requires all structures within the proposed project demonstrate energy efficiency exceeding the standards of Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code by 20%. The applicant identified that this measure would be financially infeasible. The Planning Commission raised a number of issues pertaining to the proposed project. Those issues included energy efficiency, especially with regard to the G55 extensive glass use in the medical complex, water use from the corner fountain and medical entry area water feature, the feasibility of the recommended city entry sign on the corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and replacement with public art, the lack of a deceleration lane into the medical complex on the easterly Fred Waring Drive, lack of public gathering areas and pedestrian scale, in general, as well as in conjunction with the medical complex water feature and concerns brought up by the applicant pertaining to the recommended conditions. After closing the public hearing and deliberating, the Planning Commission ultimately concluded that two stories for Building 13 and the extra tower height for the drugstore was acceptable and have included this in their recommendation to the City Council. Since the DEIR comment period did not conclude until after the Planning Commission meeting, the Commission did not take action specifically on the applicants request regarding the greenhouse gas emissions mitigation measure. With regard to the medical center water feature the Commission concluded that it should be re -designed to be more water efficient, use less energy, and be located to where it could be in immediate proximity to pedestrians. To enhance pedestrian friendliness the Commission has made a recommendation for the removal of some of the excess parking spaces in order to provide additional public area in both complexes. The Commission concluded that the condition for a city entry sign should be deleted as the sign is best suited for the southeast corner of this intersection. Commissioners recommended the fountain proposed for the same corner of the project be replaced with a public art piece. Due to the heavy traffic on Fred Waring Drive, the Commission felt a deceleration lane should be added for the easterly medical complex driveway and has recommended this to the City Council. This would result in two of the three driveways along Fred Waring Drive having deceleration lanes. The other is for the westerly driveway serving the commercial complex. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of all applications, on 5-0 votes for the Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map and 4-1 with Commissioner Weber voting no on the Site Development permit. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT On September 18, 2007, during a Study Session item discussing the traffic impacts of development projects to the Washington Street and Highway 111 corridors, City Council directed staff to complete two items: 1) optimize traffic signal operation at Highway 111 and Washington Street, and 2) commission a 656 report to study alternatives for improvements to the northern portion of the Washington Street Corridor. The City's takeover of Highway 111 has allowed greater flexibility coordinating signals on both Highway 111 and Washington Street. However, improving the northern portion of Washington Street has required coordination with Palm Desert, Indian Wells and Riverside County as all have jurisdiction over this roadway. Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) has agreed to participate in this project by funding 75% of the cost of a corridor study. On March 17, 2009, City Council will be asked to consider the award of a consultant services contract for the study of Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) for the Washington Street Corridor. This study will develop and evaluate TSM/TDM alternatives to reduce travel delays either through: a) a more effective use of existing capacity, b) adding capacity (if feasible), c) traffic signal synchronization, d) encouraging motorists to use transit, car/van pooling, etc., e) encouraging motorists to travel at less congested times, and/or f) encouraging pedestrian and bicycle alternatives. The TSM/TDM Study will identify options to address existing and anticipated congestion along the Washington Street Corridor. Since the subject project is located within a critical link in this corridor, The Public Works Department recommends the following condition of approval be added to the recommended conditions of approval for the tentative parcel map and site development permit for the subject project: The applicant shall at a minimum establish and administer a transportation demand management plan in accordance with LQMC 9.180 — Transportation Demand Management. In addition, the applicant shall, as directed by the City Engineer, implement all TOM programs identified in the Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management Study for the Washington Street and Highway 111 Corridors. Since it would have been inappropriate for them to consider a condition of approval on an item that had not yet been considered by City Council, this condition of approval was not included in the agenda packet for the Planning Commission meeting of February 24, 2009 when the Commission considered the Mayer Villa Capri project. For your consideration, this condition has been included as Condition #102 in the recommended Site Development Permit Resolution and Conditions of Approval and as Condition #82 in the recommended Tentative Parcel Map Resolution and Conditions of Approval. 657 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES: The Findings, as noted in the attached Resolution, required by the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and CEQA, can be made, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. The City has identified all of the adverse environmental impacts and feasible mitigation measures which can reduce potential adverse environmental impact to insignificant levels where feasible, or to the lowest achievable levels where significant adverse unavoidable adverse environmental impacts remain. The findings have also analyzed three alternatives to determine whether they are reasonable or feasible alternatives to the proposed Project, or whether these alternatives might reduce or eliminate the significant adverse impacts of the proposed Project. The Final EIR presents evidence that implementing the proposed Project will contribute to significant adverse impacts which cannot be substantially mitigated to an insignificant level. All feasible alternatives and mitigation measures are recommended for adoption or identified for implementation by the City and other agencies where appropriate. The City finds that the Project's benefits are substantial as outlined, and that these benefits justify overriding the unavoidable significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed Project. The City further finds that the benefits, when balanced against the unavoidable significant adverse impacts, outweigh these impacts because of the environmental, social and economic benefits which accrue to the City. The alternatives available to the City Council include: 1. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council certifying an Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2007121009) including adoption of CEQA Findings and Statement of Facts, and Statement of Overriding Considerations for Environmental Assessment 2006-582. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Site Development Permit 2006-875, subject to Conditions. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Conditional Use Permit 2006-105, subject to Conditions. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Parcel Map 35088, subject to Conditions; or 2. Do not adopt the Resolutions approving the Project; or 3. Provide staff with alternative direction. 558 Respectfully submitted, Les J nson, Planning Director Approved for submission by: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of March 23, 2004 3. Commercial Complex plans 4. Medical Complex plans 5. Tentative Parcel Map exhibit 6. Letter received via e-mail 7. Final Environmental Impact Report 8. Draft Planning Commission Minutes for the Meeting of February 24, 2009 City Council Minutes 15 March 17, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF 30.2t ACRES INTO 94 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LOTS (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31434 - MONROE DATES, LLC) It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Franklin to adopt Resolution No. 2009-024 as amended (amending the conditions to allow a 15-foot wide setback on Lots 24 and 25 and the play station amenity to be optional). City Attorney Jenson clarified the amended amendments are to Condition Nos. 81 and 88. Motion carried with Mayor Adolph absent. 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR: 1) CERTIFICATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2008-582, ADOPTION OF FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION, ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT; 2) APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875 TO ALLOW A RETAIL COMPLEX AND MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX ON 25+ ACRES WITH APPROXIMATELY 234,450 t SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA; 3) APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105; AND 4) APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 35088 TO DIVIDE THE SITE INTO 10 PARCELS (WITH 5 LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FRED WARING DRIVE BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET AND PALM ROYALE DRIVE. APPLICANT: MAYER VILLA CAPRI, L.P. Principal Planner Sawa presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Kirk, Public Works Director Jonasson explained one deceleration lane into the commercial site was proposed, and the Planning Commission added a condition to require an easterly deceleration lane into the medical facility. He explained the traffic study did not meet the 50-vehicle threshold during peak hours, which was established when the project was first brought before the City Council. Planning Director Johnson further explained the concern of the Planning Commission was with patrons to the medical complex entering on the first entrance and the potential for rear -end accidents; and the truck routing would be from City Council Minutes 16 March 17, 2009 Washington Street, unloading at the back side of the building and exiting at the center drive isle to Fred Waring Drive. In response to Council Member Kirk, Principal Planner Sawa confirmed the Planning Commission determined the view impact was not as severe as staff's assessment. Planning Director Johnson stated the applicant will initially install the core infrastructure, driveways and perimeter improvements for both sites. Public Works Director Jonasson stated standard language to ensure bonds are in place for the improvements and subdivision improvement agreement. In response to Council Member Franklin, Planning Director Johnson explained the number of parking spaces allocated for the medical building is just under the requirement for all five buildings to be medical offices. Mayor Pro Tem Henderson asked staff to explain a reference regarding Title 24 on Page 24. Planning Director Johnson explained it is a response to the AB 32 Greenhouse Gas Emissions provision and was identified as a mitigation measure in the draft EIR. He stated language has been added to provide some flexibility because Title 24 requirements are expected to increase in August 2009; it also provides flexibility to address a hardship on an administrative level. Mayor Pro Tem Henderson expressed caution on these issues as AB 32 and SB 275 are under serious consideration for suspension for a period of time. Planning Director Johnson suggested the applicant talk with the local electric provider as programs are available to assist in compliance with the legislative requirements. The Mayor Pro Tem declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 7:57 p.m. Larry Burrows, representing Mayer Villa Capri, stated the property is two separate parcels; the retail center is an asset the Mayer and Gordon family will manage for years to come, and the medical buildings are a part of a partnership with Mayer and Medical Real Estate Development. He noted it is in their best interest to make sure the perimeter improvements are completed. He stated they are in agreement with the condition related to the Title 24 issues. Marvin Roos, of MSA Consulting, reviewed parking for the medical building site, landscaping, and the elimination of the water feature in front of the building. He also reviewed pedestrian access between the projects, food court areas at the retail site, the extended deceleration lane, raised median on Washington Street, and increased size of the pedestrian plaza. He stated City Council Minutes 17 March 17, 2009 61 parking spaces have been eliminated but the project is still in excess for medical use. In response to Council Member Kirk, Mr. Roos explained the wall height depicted in the view shot is six feet. Regarding the lane study, he confirmed they are seeking three entries from Fred Waring Drive and are aware of the full access constraints. As for adding another deceleration lane, he voiced concern about eliminating 30 more parking spaces. He noted the City policy for requiring deceleration lanes is based on 50 trips per hour during peak hours; and stated one entrance is estimated at 40 trips per hour and the other is estimated at 12 trips per hour. Council Member Kirk inquired about visibility of the rear elevation of the market, and would the applicant be willing to add some vertical elements. John Vuksic, the architect, stated the rear elevation will be visible from the middle school. He questioned the vertical treatments bringing anything to the project but is willing to consider it. Council Member Kirk requested the architect point out the unique elements of the project. Mr. Vuksic stated there are several layers to the buildings and strong shading elements throughout the complex. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henderson, Mr. Burrows stated the two water features have been eliminated. In regard to Title 24, he stated the developer is in agreement with the policies, and do not anticipate a significant impact to the project. Mayor Pro Tem Henderson asked if the City has imposed the 20% requirement on other projects, to which Planning Director Johnson responded, "Yes." Ian Rhodes inquired about traffic and suggested a roundabout be installed. Scott Arthur voiced concern about the amount of traffic the project will produce, and stated there is already a considerable amount of traffic on Palm Royale Drive. He questioned why traffic for this project is not kept on the main thoroughfare and expressed safety concern for children walking in the area; he suggested moving the entrance to the rear of the property. There being no additional requests to speak, the Mayor Pro Tem declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:31 p.m. Council Member Kirk requested staff address the suggestion for a roundabout, and moving the entry north on Palm Royale Drive. City Council Minutes 18 March 17, 2009 Public Works Director Jonasson stated the roundabout might impede on the traffic signal at Palm Royale Drive; and moving the driveway to the north would not be a problem but would entail major changes to the site plan. Council Member Kirk stated the environmental analysis indicates traffic cannot be mitigated but does not include Palm Royale Drive and Fred Waring Drive. Planning Director Johnson reviewed the intersections that cannot be mitigated, which does not include Palm Royale Drive and Fred Waring Drive. Council Member Kirk conveyed empathy for traffic in the neighborhood but feels the citywide benefit of the project outweighs the impacts to the neighboring communities; and noted the buffer of office buildings is good for the neighboring residents. He stated the Planning Commission recommendation for a deceleration lane is appropriate; this is not a pedestrian project because few people will be walking to the project but he appreciates the minor modifications for pedestrian use. He referenced the lack of trees in much of the parking areas, and suggested more pop -outs and shade closer to the buildings on the medical office site. Council Member Sniff agreed the project needs more covered parking and shade trees, but otherwise supports the project. Council Member Franklin concurred with Council Member Kirk's comments. Mayor Pro Tem Henderson stated she feels the 20% standard of Title 24 is a little excessive and suggested a compromise of 10%. She also conveyed a desire for some type of water feature. Council Member Kirk stated the Planning Commission has been very sensitive regarding water efficiency issues as directed by the City Council as long as a project is meeting its target. He is not opposed to directing staff to approve a pedestrian -scale water feature. Council Member Sniff stated he agrees with the judicious use of water. Council Member Kirk stated he supports the Planning Commission's recommendation of 20% for Title 24, noting it is likely to be higher in the near future. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Henderson, Planning Director Johnson confirmed the 20% is based on the current Title 24 and would not increase with any changes in August. City Council Minutes 19 March 17, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE VILLA CAPRI PROJECT (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 35088) IS RECOGNIZED AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE; RECOGNIZING THE OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS TO CERTAIN SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; AND RECOGNIZING THE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED BUT CAN BE REASONABLY AND SUBSTANTIALLY MITIGATED IF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2006-582 — MAYER VILLA CAPRI, LP.) It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Franklin to adopt Resolution No. 2009-025 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Adolph absent. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AND A MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FRED WARING DRIVE BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET AND PALM ROYALE DRIVE. (SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2006-875 — MAYER VILLA CAPRI, LP.) It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Franklin to adopt Resolution No. 2009-026 as amended (requiring additional shade in the medical complex parking areas as approved by the Planning Director and a pedestrian -scale water feature also to be approved by the Planning Director and subject to the water efficiency ordinance). Motion carried with Mayor Adolph absent. RESOLUTION NO. 2009-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONVALESCENT/REHABILITATION FACILITY AS PART OF A MEDICAL OFFICE COMPLEX AND 10,000+ SQUARE -FOOT RETAIL STORES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FRED WARING DRIVE BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET AND PALM ROYALE DRIVE. (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-105 — MAYER VILLA CAPRI, LP.) It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Franklin to adopt Resolution No. 2009-027 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Adolph absent. City Council Minutes 20 March 17, 2009 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBDIVISION OF 25t ACRES INTO TEN PARCELS (FIVE FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FRED WARING DRIVE BETWEEN WASHINGTON STREET AND PALM ROYALE DRIVE. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 35088 — MAYER VILLA CAPRI, LP.) It was moved by Council Members Kirk/Franklin to adopt Resolution No. 2009-028 as submitted. Motion carried with Mayor Adolph absent. The City Council meeting was recessed. The City Council meeting was reconvened. Mayor Pro Tern Henderson suggested Study Session Item No. 3 be continued to the April 7, 2009 meeting. STUDY SESSION ....... continued 2. DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 THROUGH 2013/2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Public Works Director Jonasson presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Henderson, Public Works Director Jonasson explained the identification of $2.2 million for Jefferson Street is included with Add Project No. 12; the on -going maintenance is not identified and the funding source is to be determined. He stated the east side lots are in a better situation because the old par 3 course behind it can possibly be incorporated into the City's lots. Mayor Pro Tern Henderson stated she agrees with moving the mid -block crossing project out of the capital budget but does not want it totally removed. Engineering Consultant Nickerson stated staff has calculated the annual operating costs for the parkways on Jefferson Street at $12,000. Council Member Sniff stated the proposed Capital Improvement Program is ambitious, and asked if funds are on hand and readily available to complete the projects. Public Works Director Jonasson explained there are sufficient THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY 442ron] WilLlI:1 WASHINGTON & FRED r c�1\1 --\'f E R (A XT, r'EN Th'R PR F$1-V ux$IC ATTACHMENT # 2 (1 OF 2) WARING 0 m z N 0" THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I Ir I I II I� I I I ti I I j w W u7 {, ` � I oI I , U) I �1 Il£ I 3 IL I l I WATER _ FEATURE 1 z J1 ° MAR APT mo I ornm I I � 11 II ISri11/.UP RGGn ISTA]I3. (tAR9f7.. r I�.M V.PWHI 1 I 11 II I � f { DRY m ANW �1 W n_0 RIP Rom zi.cs L.trahnac .+t»sY Nlcw i4NRtT _—------- . — — — — --------�.—�—�7bN1 OLIC -SIGN T1YEEi Ay AGITxA SAIALI BY!£R ACACIA 2[ BOX MULTI COO GEABALPM CFCAI-AOO CABCALOTE MBox IM71 AST ACAOA SIINOrHY A SHOESTRING ACACIA MBOX STANDARD COAL Comm roELl7 A01E7AP DST MUSEUM PALO VEDE BF BOX ILL71 F"a cool u PAAE= FKVWR pE001 So1ORAN PALO VE DE LMILE LEAF ASH 7B' BOX SO BOX MLT mun u LA BM PQCA GAPE MYRTLE 2f Box MULTI TPU TT4WLiV TFu 7NO TIES BB' BOX STANDARD PALAEY y, CH CHAMAERM H ASJB L®IIBSMIEAN FAN PALM of BOX 1iB PD PNOEM DACMfE1A DATE PALM M' NT. SHOVEL pR WR WAS NOIaMA ROBUSTA MDaaANN PAN PALM 19 HR. SGN® 0 O LAROE SHRUBS IL BOUK)MN J.EAU JOLN BOUOAKALEA 6GAL CN CAMBIA NEMOrH A ■EHY Sli A S GAL aO CALBALRL7NBA U PUB RED NO OF PARADE S GAL LFO Latmoom f W m PNRF9OB6.OTIN CLOID'O®1 CLOUD TM B GAL TP 11404ERA PBPTAANA YELLOW GLEAM" s GAL a a •a ►®BY BHUBS Boo BOIGYYM1IEA+DON U LA• BOUGAKAJAA S GAL BA BOIgYfRJbV1iABT® 11. BdgAIMARA SGAL CAC CAIFORMGA RAJA FARY DUSTER 5 GAL am EIIORIA M VNIER GOLD' ED OLEN S GAL EB I EBAORA RACEMOBA EASIER EGG BUSH S DAL LPR PI LCOPRYWY LANOMA UE 7N0 BRAVO' W O BIAWO• TM a GAL LFT LEUDORMLY CA = M'MSMHi aaD"MMDEI aalD' TM S GAL WED MU LE BOM OMIOSA BAMBOO MU1LY S GAL II I 1MILBEI BOA CABINS TELL MST, 7EGAL MDT' TM I GAL SO P PENSGBI EETACEIY'CUPFEW RRLE FOUNTAIN GRABS S GAL meRISM A EO SEIFOR IS CORAL FOUNTAN S GAL SIP R6LA PE NI LLAB IRA BiL 5 DAL DRYSTREAM VAD- 0 Ls I"*"' IVP ROOM N1JO V. pDIRGOA) vw.naw OFIM ►AGAO u sFltev.vr team F.i g s • . SMALL SAL SHALSS SALEYA MI LTRADATA CEMENT MARGOLD 1 GAL R FLILLA BRONANA RATF REIA S GAL BO GALVIA OIE07 AUrU N SAOE S GAL ACCENT 81UU1B6 AAC AGAVE ALBNCMLA CBOWR• PLANT 6 GAL AO AGAVE 09tFLORA AGAVE I GAL AN AGAVE PALIM AGAVE S GAL AVB ALOE VHU WABSADENS0) L� IONAL ALOE B GAL DL DASYLFION LQA098)MY MEN GRASS TREE R`A S CAL DE DASYLVI O N WHEELM OESEIT'OCK S GAL SO EOINOSACTIB GFROM GOLDEN 9AR 9_ CACTLO C DIALElB1 FI FDUOIItA WLEDES OCOTLLO St HT. 7CAME UK M NI'ELIALDE PARYR.O I® YUCCA BA GAL In HElEALOE PARIFL.O&A'7ELLOW YELLOW YUCCA BGAL NA NOLKA LRAO.AMA BEAR GRASS BGAL OB ONIIIRA BASLA0 BEAVE1TAL CACTUS BARE ROOT YR YUCCA IIOSTRATA YUCCA SGAL YIR YUOA NmA YUCCA ! oLL EBPALH IVKES NK 9000Vf&LEA SA BANA KAISC BOUOMAILEA S GAL WPM TO WAIL O GALLAN3 A AIAEGULAIERA INL POWDER rJT M GAL SW TO WALL - CM M MACRO►TI A YE LOW OROM WE S GAL WIRE TO WAIL srr v:` GRDLBOOOVSk :1 -. ASP ASPARAGUS S70OSP A WARAOLA PEIIN :CAL AL CB CHBSA G'BOXWOOD 8EAUIT NATAL PLW S GAL ' - Ocle A G •OWN CARIM CARPET NATAL RUIN 1 GAL -i 'd DC DALCANTATA FA lBBA GOLD SGAL NORTH LAM LANTAM MONTEVDEM98 PARE PRO&LA7NTUN 1tYL SCALE' 1•a50• LNG LANDITIEW GOLD' IA SPREADING YELLOW LANTNN I GAL GRAPHIC SCALE iCRY1 OEBd ROUA, PROM SOUTHWEST BOLDER AND STORE 10o-540-70 7W73VOM SEE PLAN FOR SIZES GRAVE NOUN GOLD - r-C - COVES AREA CDI/LOMY. MOM SOUINMINT BOULDER AND REIE DO DESERT SIFT Decompo ® OANTE 1M ISAS WI TP pm - 7 DEM PACE N AL PLANING UEAB UM!'m OIIEISSSE NOTED co m PG YS o LANDSCAPE APCME= NC 74020 ALES ATDW. BLYTE E PAW DESERT, CA 92M ow)Swam FAX GYM 773-SM EAUL lsm u.-Pdc _. In w U J Z Z � J U zc LL c� U w'' g VJ Z Z Lu w Fcc U— SPECFICATK*M SHEET BOOK❑ PRO.). MIM Fr DRAWN AB CHECKED PRW NO F106" DATR 02/13/011 SCALES T-SO-O' ItVEION& LS PER ARCH OL10.07 12V PER CTVL OLnV7 �•, FM CTVL 011/.07 (fY PER CNL TLW.07 PER ARCH V-17.07 aLV 1E8 UPDAM D21GAD GNBFLAN dffT FRO• Sp-1 TABLE AND CHAIRS TYP ,PROPOSED SHADESTRUCTURE BY ARCHITECT TYP. PROPOSED AWNING BY ARCHITECT TYP. MEDIUM_ SHRUB GROUND COVER SMALL_ SHRUB MEDIUM ACCENT SHRUB I r SEE SP-1 FOR PLANT PALETTE NORTH SCALE: l'—TO' GRAPHIC SCAM ao w %c a o _ / J Ira' I z+� ► .I� KEY MAP LANDOCME AFK;H 7S. Ha 74M AlJES&AM70 SLATE E PALU DEMW CA 92200 (m) dM-042A FA% 0e0) 77YSO15 E-WL rq'rDi'P+ W U z O F-- J� =a U U� QQ O ww z� 0 z Q 3 W Ir LL SPE A'"TK)NS SHEET❑ BOOK PRO./. MDR. RP DRAWN KC CHECKED PROJ. NP RCO24 DATE, 12/19107 OCALE+ T-io-w Fff= NS Q PER CIVIL. OL26.07 0 BHECT MD SP-2 ,®,.. RHM RnN wv \ 1 / i'-- muaxeRR �-er� `:\�, REIK RFIMr - -- -------- ---------- - � u Cmtl,rmo. rrr+u ssa rspr� VM, cwr wauurr! u r auWrr q w auupgbnnn "Villa Capri' SITE PLAN Mayer Corporation Exhbit Date: February 13, 2W9 omca e.:r» - = .-A f,3 `4r 1 �:mav 1 I i ' =-�- I --. 0 Whim P I "Villa Capri' Mayer Corporation _ x te—., te—., uup�W u FP!JwEl�Jiiw�i�0i W 1NAU r� _ FMxn •• FL Iff — s PREIIMINNRY GUDNG rrwanu emla�n xulauon m� 0 r I,I �jr--__-t 11 n II 1 r �ea,r�►. ' I � II II p I gin r� Jr 1 = c 1I I II � I m+ua, m 4 I 11 ..on o' mwn * I II I I L 1 II III I Fl 1 II I I I a - - _ II \� L��JI II I la a � ! II i II III raw ei ��il II u,� �406' m I 11 II I II y D� y I IJ + II I ❑ I L •• R I I BULDMG 2 1 1 I I II 6Apt180emu Fr. 1 4 I I rmne* i��il I I mwL m. II I I LJ 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I 4 1 I I I 1 i 1 �� I ❑ i l --t ------ I Ll kl1 11 BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLAN Q- SAM SOL SCALE: O-M WASHINGTON & FRED WARING 0 I BUILDING 3 FLOOR PLAN �g smo eqA SCALE: PREST VUKSIC BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1AY'•Td' I I I I BUILDING 3 WEST ELEVATION -- _ SCALE' 11b't1'4r rn BUILDING 3 SOUTH ELEVATION COURTYARD SCALE BUILDING 3 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 3 NORTH ELEVATION sCA a tml,'•c SCALE *Ws V - I I I 1 I I I BUILDING 2 WEST ELEVATION _ aCAI.E•+nrYra I I BUILDING 2 NORTH ELEVATION COURTYARD SCALE1!SIT-T BUILDING 2 SOUTH ELEVATION BCALE IM' r ' KEYNOTES ❑j vRR[� casnmuasau w9l>Ff ..E16UHalE �j es¢rrE,x ca�lsz Jva,crlA, esLa srnm Mo Mono ca+ad ❑> iauarEct ooaesmee.�n8«s®ueraxrane ©P �6.em aMsd+mlaLGM'w" O ,-k © waarn arm a,imnc ❑p .per reuAr Q aa1 F d>�U DOMMr+6N 50EMUcam rae �a s>�u►sr © Max. p MIfK gMrllY_Y.CFYCif/RMIOD�DRbI ❑p a�svpesuoe o�sepss FINISH SCHEDULE .O nss rMs+tsr� -caws FlRMe aao aus .O ms wu,t � - cane ono wwl nm © wa .MFxLW®I.cAacolfwIDlrNK p MR RYAI uI -mmwwE Ml © nn wrutm�-rm.wmnuLnw Q MM L,NI Lonos - ranee cane. a.a o¢n PRESTAKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING ��Nr , J .11 elipplipulIT .14NN6 It, INAN, n., WILDING li NOT(I'll KLE1'1'1,10K %T CIMMITYUM SIGN SIGNAGE 111 11 DING n :1 VART %Tl().% N 110Y F14011 Rlltll'l'l%r CFVrFR III ILDINC :1 S01 T11 AT rc)i7tM-Al l) P R E S T - V U K S I C WASHINGTON & FRED WARING C r� N rl, E, R I I 11111.111\G :1 NORI'll r:I.K\`.\TION - VIF;11 MOM NORTH Rp:ltvlrli I-;NlrIt\VCI•: O111.11156 _ A :1 ISKSI KLF:\.1TI(1\ - %IF.%V F'It11\I If;19111]'GIOS RI7:1•: KI' III 11.11"G t ROCTH 9I.10AVuN' - \IKh 11Itp11 8.VRIIIXC.Tp% RTUR11 KXTIC\SCI; WASHINGTON & FRED WARING CENTER PREST VUKSIC - i { anlGer 1 Iesvlr,m� 1 r 1 1 Y• 1 1 Y 1 i i I 1 I I 1 ' ' 1 I I I I Ar_. 1__1__r__-1 � I 1 t Y Y �' 1 1 ' I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 -Y 1 i 1 1 i I 1 1 1 I 1 ! I 1 I Ope.M I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 { 1 i -- 11 1 El } 1 9 ' 1 r 1 i 11 I 1 I i 1 � I - 1 1 , t 1 _ i ❑ I 10'.O I 1 I 1 1 1 IIIIL. WAN00.L1 I ®" ii-nx Ix mw. Yd I rA>F� 1 ------------ BUILDING 2 ROOF PLAN 0 BUILDING 3 ROOF PLAN (0 5A001w a SCALE 118ft7 W 5,000 eq R SCALE IA%11'4r PREST 1lUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING iJ T� , �_� -I I r , e AW M tv4oxm. Oft ar wMa.m. BUILDING 3 BUILDING SECTION A SCALE.- 1s•=1'-w I I I I I BUILDING 2 BUILDING SECTION B --- SCALE. lffi vV' ,Mkl DN WOf�RFYC- +n BUILDING 3 BUILDING SECTION C BUILDING 2 BUILDING SECTION C SCALE: IIE•-r-0' SCALE va+ra WASHINGTON & FRED WARING �� ,J ;�, �� PREST VUKSIC K I BUILDING 4 FLOOR PLAN 6.245 •VL SCALE IMIT-T rMl PREST VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING J BUILDING 4 SOUTH ELEVATION � ® 4 BUILDING 4 EAST ELEVATION or-#M lM%l • Q 4 Q Q Q Q i i i i i i BUILDING 4 NORTH ELEVATION BCILLe:,A•OW Q BUILDING 4 WEST ELEVATION SCAM,re•.,w WASHINGTON 8c FRED WARING KE"OTES FINISH SCHEDULE ❑j �� BFIliMM 9CnM RlSIl6EE i1gI5OfDILE RILPII IIIRN-ta[R PoP.Yt tllMO1W! 0 Ar4VV1 bM, UAlaTEElLV5CRi5 Ao lQ�IHI V1fR MlINIMi&.CQALRROI�IYU. E81 WLLMMAL DDDR iNtAE.1Ei HSSII XEMEfoR fdDR o rm EMPN LVlO9i-COIRL DSP o1E91 D1160 4 SLQE l98if.HR IWShcIPE. taaR O"A."K �1E WI®1•taIXt 44CDf" PAtIElO! lE1X E5iw� "A (] MR RWN LAPEII -GaLOR 11MDrtIcW11N10 5�SAL tb.TiA61E'AR,WAN A.M IFAE QM (]MR DDN Fotl1E05 •cdort CDRAL pAY DFcI! AAN59Ymw �B Td SIEEL aR{lS SFF fIISNA®LLE KRCOICR �f WER:i BEM. EEE RlDI Ki®alEEak f[lae ® 6' • i1E8 RBE, EEE ETd511 YIEPAE fGRc.QAt Q �R0.1 V EEIMGE Doan'AE{16H EpE00.E wa ® !' AYNE1RCiET R4FIL bt ❑V D,*.. EEcm O Lam' ptaDEl�lgl CflBR�IH PAQp Rm14 6� M�AI EdlpLE ® 1�'!�� R@Bl1 SIN MF®RL4l t�RMil fOl01EE O a,A«+;sunnEraEroaEw G{fIAACD®rtBl ❑b PMslu EI BYRE 5DE w PREST VUKSIC- i "\X5a++=VV BUILDING I SOUTH ELEVATION — VIEW FROM SHOPPING CENTER IIIJILDING .1 NORTH ELEVATION — VIEW FROM SERVICE ENTRY "UILDING d {PEST ELEVATION — VIEW FROM SHOPPING CEN'I'EFd nUILDING 1 EAST ELEVATION — VIENY FROM 11"ALMART WASHINGTON & FRED WARING CENTERpREsr vuKsic r� BUILDING 4 BUILDING SECTION A SCAM 191i'm Q Q Q Q Q Q i i i i i i caw e•w .- BUILDING 4 BUILDING SECTION B V.&L. 1f -110 o\—v I,� r�� , PREST-VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING � �� k H TF ,; C'1 BUILDING 4 ROOF PLAN' 5.245 iq.S SCALE: 1M"=1'4r I WA HINGTON & F ED ARIN PREST VUKSIC W � S R -, T WASHINGTON 8c FRED WARING FLOOR PLAN V 50 MARKET scM-E: sr32-yra P R E S T V U K S A R C H 11 C a a n u n o w f!c ;q�' Irk �� •___' �� N M u o o n SOUTHWEST NORTHWESTINN WASHINGTON & FRED WARING NORTHEAST ELEVATION sau. mr•ry SOUTHEAST ELEVATION •GYE vm ra MARKET KEYNOTFA �' ro"i awnr.w.®.wwc� Ja wwa :rr o� G� n� � �.irr.uoraerorm.eA ti+w�..w�►N. w.v rrwN..e. ryr af«f..� wirr�werv� Nr�. pirNq�wamrfiYfY/t.e«�N PRESTAKSIC F �-, �i : � . J �r I a4i[a� MCI l WASHINGTON & FRED WARING Nri NORTHWEST ELh:VATION PRELIMINARY ma4.g4Aif.4q �Ilgb ry�hAV.IYpeYYYrt{YbY W i�M Olgt rsf1E[«Y�w(Yiw�W WYGiYf� W 1 waM W �.r�ai•I�4bi4eMx.e PREST VUKSIC NORTHI.AST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION i�'9aVfM��Mww nJyaAY wM1iW.� MMiMalwlensew/ o�IewVrYlirwslaYOwp NMMa aw.wrb...�. uw�aM..rrna..a PREST.VUKSIC� WASHINGTON & FRED WARING PRELIMINARY A w f ------------------------ I \ FL I I II Le� 6, a o I o Il- — -1I— T — — — — -T!— — 7 — —Ij- — -7!� � I . _ , , I 12 - Z I Y-01[a7a f� IT—.—TI---I-�-----TI---R---I�--Tf— IT--II--�----�1---I--II---TI— — I--I7IT— QI.T—T-1 _T! T-7I--�——Tf 71 I II — il—--Tf----_TI—— T(---IT---fIJ T_ - -7! — —.IT -- -- — — _71— — 1T —_ — 1- - - i; Lr __ .- ❑ _ . — -a -- .__ — __ _Fj .- - _IT .-_ li — F -__I 1 I, , —ca�Yr rctr3 sa+�s -�� for t L—�LF54v �%M fo0� • vxie ax.t� rm u-[c c;�r,v mw ENTRY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN Rn Dat+p n mp,[gltd gPtsl VJek /.�dixb. k, w a drytr vsm[eWi Nst rrgMood W+h1�Ot MatAy NHvPan c dWal.JrnWFred"rUONUCAky_e pdabd,ra N c�pm�mauuKaFMt wakad,ica iY E SCALE: IM'-T-0' PREst vUKSiC 1M1'ASHINGTON & FRED WARING MnaKer ROOF PALM 0 SCALE3 z V 4, WASHINGTON & FRED WARING MARKET PREST-VUKSIC BUILDING 6 FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 8-16,137 oq.8. BULDING7-6,BIBoglL SCALE: 118=1'-0' WASHINGTON & FRED WARING : �� , PREST VUKSIC �Ilil k I':I I I I, i /' 1 J 1 t I Ilbl"Wot111 1 \ I BUILDING 7 ' Ii ! RYg6FgOd_ � � 1 I 1 r teaI -- 1� Bi' 1 Y 1 U KM ' lCAle er lDWlf 1 I M 1 1 1 �E-111e slaw � IIQ Rq6 }ICl1M w BUILDING 7 FLOOR PLAN 110 BINLOM07- 6,61E sq.fL -- SCALE: Var-T- " PRESTNUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING BUILDINDG 7 EAST ELEVATION BUILDINDG 6 EAST ELEVATION SCA .v "'.w SCALE:IMM4r BUILDINDG 6 WEST ELEVATION BUILDINDG 7 WEST ELEVATION _ _ SEALE: 71C'1W SCALE: LEb1-0' KEYNOTES FINISHSCHEOULE p pig`acrsPwamenm,EhtlDMEEE14EHgP,EOENf OM..plMwr-aanr rmwwAoxu! p°aP°en� bP,HIlfI6dECIliECD OO »ewww�-uaolaEEuowuoeE pua,u�culom„wrE1EtHIBIE®LLEEMmuv ©rEeeur,.EeE-oawoEaueeiaYe ❑1 llOE lHf8t.1A1 W11lDiOE:EglI.0Y6tl�EPYI QQ n�E wn+uim.ramrMwe w, E.TFIM to asaE p �xne,00.wwe�am�Au2�aarE ©inewux wei.raaE.amnua,We © msEVNEa�s-raau wEr vr�e p a. sPe. wfllq EEEiMNEOEiIiF rw mlO! p .r ElEE4 �wuaaa, EOBYFk! waE p .• I S� E$eawawnewera ftlq[ p winenirle.ME uateEE wwEoaur',we �P 1•AlINE11EL1EIlE�FAL ❑Y PR/'Ifffi6 �p Y�� CGB�PMMSD EMNI@IiI91 EHtAlE vE.�eeoEmeo Prmneo wxnneuweue mPca<P Q ItiOliiMRliEf#RV V ¢G1 M1p0[DElbl O PH RIO<IIU[t SALYR PREST VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING B_UILDINDG 7 NORTH ELEVATION SMA' W—V BUILDINDG 6 SOUTH ELEVATION ata.E 1W.10 O Q I BUILDINDG 7 SOUTH ELEVATION ICAO W-- ❑j �p�'lRN tDl.ONY.xawptlFE�Mfa C9LE Qj �.n��mlRa4r�wrtttuMwv..e 0t N%LDO.FYLoo]I.IIR>FF� 6ftIIilf WO41R �iLZ o..M1lsavN Qf I�W�RltOL..MI<m®�fE.t�fli Q uv�6�®G�Pn D OM e� al .at48wu.totwt.ueaau o.e �OE41fFRM G®YF Iw [¢a p. ��uv.s.camus.ww.o�..a pp rra.mwue ntE. pu vmu•rzmt p ��°a°'m.erewlm�.we�t�u pp n.oc .ea.oa.•au.,rwwmw�x p ne.ua.e..oe..n.e Q .1R rau a�oxtll Qe nw•.tn1l<tel.mm wEvm� pF .IwwNluM.m?�IOM1bW �... .O .Ia NY p.IM-M tat46.iRf BUILDINDG 6 WEST ELEVATION BUILDINDG 7 WEST ELEVATION IGtO:1M•TP DWE: 1p'.t•{f WASHINGTON & FRED WARING PREST VUKSIC :rep src�a FEE=GOV R ht 1 I �A7E GOrF ... BUILDING 6 & 7 SOUTH ELEVATION — VINE FROM PARKING LOT BUILDING 6 SOUTH ELEVATION AT COURTYARD BUILDING 7 NORTH ELEVATION AT COURTYARD P R E S T V U K S I C WASHINGTON & FRED WARING CENTER R C 1 F C I S '4 lam- F7LL'� 1 f �. ..,a L7� I.�f:- ?�?t1. Lt� �J.,.? ELI a. sum - IL .. 'Li r �� 111l1111\II If A' i •!S1 NIA%%77%IY - 7` -11`.%1. 1:LIAATION %/ NIM111: NFIII PTlUKK PREST•VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING c i.� r1�.i� I : � � ; I . > BUILDING SECTION A BUILDING 7 acw.e uxra 1 Q2 � � I e 4 C BUILDING SECTION B BUILDING 6 BUILDING SECTION C BUILDING 6 s�,er-roscx� ur-, c I I I I I I I I I n 'I) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PARTIAL BUILDING SECTION D BUILDING 6 SME +Vnwr Al,a.. ' � m BUILDING SECTION D BUILDING 7 SCALE U! Nr WASHINGTON & FRED WARING J r PREST,VUK,SI, , C WASHINGTON e 1 r'r 1 - 300 g� 1 ! 1 / 1 II 1' II /* 2 v< o o o a a i ------ -- -----------. I 1 1 - --1 _. w tow ' ' ' ' --- 1 1 1 I p� 1 1 1 1 MIMfO.frt ; 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 & FRED WARING BUILDING 6 ROOF PLAN iat�.q.n ecuE ts*ra - - - _ . - - - - - - D PREST VUKSIC o o o a a i ------ -- -----------. I 1 1 - --1 _. w tow ' ' ' ' --- 1 1 1 I p� 1 1 1 1 MIMfO.frt ; 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 & FRED WARING BUILDING 6 ROOF PLAN iat�.q.n ecuE ts*ra - - - _ . - - - - - - D PREST VUKSIC air------�� &------- - - - - -- 93 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 M1� 1 1 l I 1 1 1 1 � O ' 4 I V 1 111 41-1 I 1 1 i 1 1 1 p<. 1 1 r 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; ^ � 1 1 1 1 fr_-J------------- — --1 i ply#-----_-"'..�.__J'j 1 l yl 1 1 1, 1 I 1 1 jll 1 1 I1� 1 1 1 1 t 1 I RlIMII I ; 1 'IOU i1 ,1 1 ,Ital iae I , 1 1 1 I 1 ' IIS[ NNpO 1 i 1 -- �rleee.rowa, �� 111p! COKR I 1 1 {3 � o ------ BUILDING 7 ROOF PLAN_ 8Aw mq.a scua tJe+Jra PREST'VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING N 1, H I F 1 S m J BUILDING 9 FLOOR PLAN BUILDING 8 FLOOR PLAN S.DUDMp SCALE: 1/S'=11-T 5,00D egfl SCALE: VV-V.V PREST-VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING --: �'jNP , ► F BUILDING 8 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 9 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: IAS+Y-0" SCALE W-.*4r BUILDING 9 SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 8 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 11W=1'-T _ _ SCALE: tr-1'4r I BUILDING 8 WEST ELEVATION COURTYARD SCALE 1 BUILDING 9 EAST ELEVATION COURTYARD SCALE 115••n'-0' WASHINGTON & FRED WARING 4J�, Q - 4 BUILDING 9 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 11W-1'4r I I i I $$ 4-$ s��s�e®m�aa�e® :r-m . - BUILDING 8 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: f/5'�lYf KEYNOMS F114MH SCHWULE � �vAta+e�xc��eearntswwm3urtana+vxnuF Q mc�rtan+uuei-racx�rrxua eaowr� O re xaD, u3an on,»IQRR no o IiR PAN U00 CMM NPFM NNL➢W 3pNtuw wxW.,wimSet RYJISMlEfQt[ofDR 0MRRLPNLIY®I.G0.RFGHPG®OW N❑IN ygg4-rx„e 10", 01M CIUNN DNIA4 MTIENSL�fEEfPE oMO eu,a IA3a •[0.ac TlKME TDl Q IAbmmuva-C WMIIC,ULT © S,a�3R.waDAL e,nO@D RVE ILIEdR © "%C „HW«-ratR C-X"I DWM © muk 3,cDl® n.,006c amftmfbw O ac 6,� DE,LtlL6EE f}Ft6pHAE(gf taQt � 3�.61%. Nit6EE Rex xNezEE raNcaa O 6', S1kH 1NL 6ff,feH 6OFAlE SCRC<lW O ROEPfi q DXK ME RNII K4MEFER © 3'AYW, PM TIEYM Q STEEL MI ❑N a1c+s•ecEb ®�� LBfBIIrINRY.®Eie1�SEE Rex EOEULLE flw•u,ueorz cevE rrevu,m Ratsa Rex SaFou.E «tt Eolcrt Il 6ll/DM s/n IEUL3 W0-W OWZED Ras, O PEESTAN)R:SN 61YCIIIE PREST VUKSIC [[5:7 N r 1 F 0 BUILDING D WEST ELEVATION AT COURTYARD WILDING A & 0 NORTH FlYVATION - VIFN FROM sHOrpwr CI:VTF.R BUILDING 9 EAST ELEVATION AT COURTYARD PREST-VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING ("ENTER A R C H I T E C T S BUILDING fl FAST ELEVATION — VIEW FROM SERVICE. ENTRANCE BUILDING fl & fl SOUTH ELEVATION — VIEW FROM FRED WARING A,xwa1 TUN -` BUILDING II WEST ELEVATION — VIEW PARKING LOT PREST VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING CENTER A R C H T E C' T S i i %II1 '.)n Gi A"G sr Ap"m BUILDING 8 BUILDING SECTION A SCALE: 1M'+1'-0'• I I su f T"- BUILDING 9 BUILDING SECTION B SCALE- I I I BUILDING 9 BUILDING SECTION C BUILDING 8 BUILDING SECTION C SCALE: IM511-0" SCALE. 10111"VV WASHINGTON & FRED WARING r,, -o Vm P R E S T V U K S I C :t rs % a a--------- a-------- B i ASiteDIM 1 1 1 I ' I 1 1 i �wetcnu 1 i 1 I � I i 1 1 1 rU`----_`-'--`-r----'--'---___-'I 1 1 ra► 1 rtasauow I I I I I 1 I r ' I 1 1 i,__L-_ 1 1 Armen 1 1 A Adl BUILDING 9 ROOF PLAN BUILDING 8 ROOF PLAN 6A66 pAL SCALE: 10"'4r 5.m 84JL - - SCALE: 116b11-0' WASHINGTON & FRED WARING V _�Nr, PREST VUKSIC hts ftseiC h ooWgNod b/Pres, V*Wk diecb, br, W is co tf seo,2*CVBmee bmW 9dieWAsaicorwaweh.gWesd and W&-q i. u aub ca kyd* m ks cad Was 1c fr4mowadofPmdVumaMd ,Ma (.0 SCALE: 1/S'=1'-W WASHINGTON & FRED WARING �� DRUG STORE PREST VUKSIC NORTH ELEVATION SCAM: lMr-/'-I' EAST ELEVATION SCALE:118'=1'd1' SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8'-1'-0' KEYNOTES 16 EXIERCR Er60 VTN & WIN MBI, 5E PNISM SCFEOLE FOR COLOR T rec COaM JONF, CAWT BELOL 5OFFTS AID 'J HoLLOL rETAL ODOR r FRAFE SEE FRbN SCEDILE FOR COLOR SORE NVMA • MR NAR66'rk., COLOR CFAMA "AN PATTERN: LEC¢STOFE .53 AJAL L4N2M`RCNT, RA70AL A40DIZFD FRAFE 1 CLEAR 3' DIA COLLM M3 STEEL TR' LS, SEE FMSH SCIEDILE FAR COLOR J Am STEEL BE.W, SEE FMW SOTEMU FOR COLOR 6N0 STEEL U61. BEE rAW 6C1EDLtE FOR COLOR U MtAL ROLL LP SERVICE DOCK SEE FMW SC EVW FOR iJ 3' AUM M WAM REVEAL FM CAVOPT FWX-56 L�"-II F10 ORUR cvw FIN DASMO Fw. SEE FMIESL 4nu LJ 6'AN'OM H.G7 MAL AM ✓ C.'_AR RMIXED F)ftW NOT Lao f]I6 PLYLDDD C c*I FtraASp4 idb1PRMNdifiHdtllxk,bc,WISN*da mI6CVSbeebcMa[IBNa7eWa mofflodIk mW d"iI V WM CA. Any DMarLse it parMMotut ft mmres6 Rn w6retRdRMt YAWc/RdrUct InC FINISH SCHEDULE © rM RAN LARir1 • CCLM FMAR IYYO NA13 �o rM PAN LAM • COLOR: RITORD NALL ra3 © tM RALFF LAMflI • COLOR: DEEP 69EN G40 M:R PAN LAJfE31- COLOR WANE 1*1 O KP. RAIPr LAM • COLOR TRAorTaw TNw O I M D.M WSARTS -'CO-OP. CORAL CLAY DM115 WASHINGTON & FRED WARING DRUGSTORE PREST AKSIC SOUTH WEST F:J.MV MOM ��vnQaN+'�4nwve� �.ti~,asantr mm h wl;tcbwl+tM Ma[aNmmco WxMya W Fq N�+ip b U Onu U lry Qe iee i pMbkd WW fe n," Wf wwtclp" VAuAwftrAvx WASHINGTON & FRED WARING DRUG STORE I PREST VUKSIC ?:kHT VA,E ' kl'l0N �ws,.njaay�MgRW vetWaaeawc.aerakr ura Ncusuwema • t+lwoa ®raw+n.Mpunav rrmnyrum++uayrre.apnwdr +copra .�.mnav4aw.crc+�rc PREST WASHINGTON & FRED WARING c .� DRUGSTORE vUK1. 1 BUILDING SECTION A SCALE 11fr= '-W eu wvee w.K Nvu a fA k BUILDING SECTION B SCALE: 718'=1'4r mc*ftCMbabcae*wx,,aowra re FmdWAVhl.m*QkAly rrwbpaA0ie0AMbwW gftmwdFmdvd*wAmklmL WASHINGTON Bc FRED WARING � DRUG STORE PRESi�VUKSIC 0.5 — — — V 14 ' iJry O TOP V — — T WASHINGTON & FRED 14`AP.ING KEYNOTES �j 10 DMRYJR CEM3fr OT14 EYWW FMK SEE R%H 50MU FOR COLOR O q5 SHEET mTA CRTTROL JOM, CARRf BFI M SOMTS AND MOM CORERS �3 HOLLOW FVAL DOOR 4 FRA1¢, 5EE FF W SCEDIILE FOR CRLR A❑ P LE71[BLL DY- KRRE�STRE. COLOR, CVABLB UFITAL 5❑ IXUAL OLM5TOREFRom, NATAk RXDRDD FRim 4 CLEAR © 3' DIA COLu" ❑1 W STEEL. TR ELLt5. SEE FKA KMOLLE FOR COLOR © lb 51EEL BEAR, 9EE FFL,H Sd®LLE FOR COLOR S� 6xD MEL TUBE. 5EE FMEN FOCWDLILE FOR COLOR O aIAL POLL LP SERVICE DOOR 5EE FWA4 6CIEDILE fOR II OR 3' ALL IKM TEGLET REVEAL ® STEEL CANOPY F Q'+C•rb' RECESS Q W EMRIOR CV -ENT 97N DASED FKSR GEE FVLSH 6REDAi FOR COLOR 5TADFG %AT 4'ETAL ROOF W 6.P LR A17DM FWA4 ® NOT LWD r BOLTAF ROOM G 0 F'L1L OD COMET _ TOE TWi dw%iswffQ bVPmd V1llaChtAnb. Wt, 8Dd 001" E .9s E4 tw U15m CVS b brbu* Stft Nol*aAamerd wwkjnw Fred "In La Rlira CA Any diver we is ps4bW wNwt N w,-w. rtibl aorsaidFtBA Vnitic AidJllCts, la. ROOF PLAN SCALE: PREST-VUKSIC r[j-j DRUG STORE = - TYPICAL SHADE CANOPY PREST VUKSIC WASHINGTON & FRED WARING ATTACHMENT # 2 (2 OF 2) n 9 m z N PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH BUItGHARD LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP B D G at AR CHIIfc15 - nm ■+N ce.e rnf ,o B U -R G• H A R f? rune, can:,n+,nu DISIG` GRUP LA QUINTA Pi 7, SF.fNITif!! THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK aETAG rJ,LrD P ISm1R. M'ftm, ,a7-0 1 1 Tial6 V.PWiI "owl lIVr,- 1 ,I, IL ,ICY L -COVPAA-ERED�5 PPLARKING % - =•T� OFFICES ril n �s r, usNnDDTt ]143 L/. (eOXOOd) •.Anr, (4�w1 WNW W� .Y — _ ��.-- - A ► - — — — — — — — MAN Fib WMiN— _�-- —_ --- CI - - .PY l�°EE AJY ACAW,iAAYAI BMMT ACADIA 2t BOx MULTI WO CEA6NJ*M CAOA.ACO CAOCALOTE 20 BOX MULTI ! AV siillIi am ACAW$I9lD"fi LA OY91CDIm HMM DEsfw muB GHOSYTRM ADAM DEMM IAEW ►ALO VE DE waox W BOx STANDAD MULTI w OFFICOM PAAEDDx 8091x1AN PAD VEDE *6 BOX MULTI PM FRAM" 0160O LITTLE LEAP AM w wx MULTI - v-• Li LAUSNMOM/A IDIMA OWE MYRTLE 20 wx MULTI TPu T1IWLATru TPUITIM wBGx STANDARD J PALA16 CTN OVAIhuion FAALE A®ITBHYEM FAIPAA 2f BOX PO J'pK DACTfuMRA RATE PAW wHT. ■gVaO/[ ' MR WARANtlTORLA RONJPTA LE76CAMFA"PAW I6IN. 03M 0 LARDS MCC FL DOIJOAM1J.EA LAJOLLK BOWNMLEA 6GAL ON CA65A NBDPYSA MAW SE NA 6 GAL OV CAERALRM PM.CHERFM 1® BM OF PARAOM 6 GAL LTG LEUOORMl1W FpNESCEB 50FIM CLOD'OFMM CLOW TM 6GAL 11. T1llIN POWYLV A YELLOW CLEAN" 6 GAL ► ED W SHFAM POD POWVNLM VM LA LA' BOUDANAA6A EVC BOUGMOLLEA TASBHPIT :GAL GAL CALLWORM CALPO 9rA BAA FATLY DUSTER 6 GAL Blow 'WINTER OOLDP EFENOPH AM'WMC 9W 5DAL BE EFEUOPHLA RACEMOSA EAME R E00 BSN 6 DAL LRN A/ LBICOPKYLLM LOYWAE WO MAVU NO EXAM TM 6 GAL LW LFUDONMLY CA OCM •IMP®N ODID'IMP93M GLOW TM 6 DAL M® M/LCll61W DMDBA BAM1100 MJNLY 6 GAL LA91 WCAMMIROR A CALA6 'COALwr IFEGAL LSST Tu I GAL MSC PBPETM WrASM'OSVEW FUME FOUNTAIN OR" 6 GAL ME M� BIA EOMN L6ETFO COAL FONTAN 60A- mr PLI11APBISLLAM pualm 5GAL DRYSTRIAM al LAMDSAPE 7,020 ALES&VI FWX $M E PALM =MIT. CA *7R60 I760J sw=4 FAx Cleo) 77-1-sft E+AAL Tw*w-vJ 1 w xW " U Dal -i• 1 -2L-Z- ff S6 I If �e 1 1 I l SHEET❑ BOOK Y....__— PAOJ. AIOR RP DFLAW AB .. � _ors-�--- • SMALL GAL SHMEB SALEYA MLTRADIATA DE61f IIAIPOOLD IOAL w RJ611A EVIOI/ANA YAW MM , A 6 GAL SO &ALMA O EO01 AURM 9AM 6 GAL ACCENT SFMMM AAC AGAVE AMBWANA cewm m" 16 GAL AO AGAVE OEMNF LORA AGAVE I GAL AN AGAVE PALM RI AGAVE 5 GAL AVB LO AE A81A O AMADOMM 1 EMNAL AL M 6 aAL DL GASaNON LONOESIAAI IEFCAN GRABS TREE 6GAL DYY DAMMION WHOMM DINIM LPOON 6 GALL EC Nd1ACACTB QRUMO I GOLDBARNS CARPEE EN Ir DIANEVIM FS FOUCUENM ItLBOBB OCORLO 6<HT. 7 CANE IN M N8ITALOEPARVFT.OVA FED YUCCA I" IEE9MLOE PARVRW�'TELCW YELOW YUCCA S:GAL GAL NA NOMA MDROCARFA BEM OIM99 5GAL OB ORMIN BAN.AR6 MAYEIRAL CACT16 BARE ROOT YT YUCCA ROSFMTA YUCCA 5OAL YLR YUCCA FIODA YUCCA A OAL ESPAUBVW $ PMK BOUOAIA J" 8AFGARA KARJST SOUOAS aj" 6 GAL TIME TO WALL CI WIWDRA NAEOI&AT RA PINK PONDER PUFF 6 GALL AP4 TD WALL ON rJ�UM WCROFERA YELLOW OMM VPE 6GAL GAPE TO MALL alOUDOOV9p AF ASPARAOIS SIMMER AWAMOM IEN 6 GAL coCAIEA G Tm FOAWCMAITT NATAL PLUM AT S GALL - COC CAMBIA G'O®N CARPET NATAL PLUM IGAL Fe. DC DA.EA CANTATA ®WY4 OOD 6 GAL LAM LANTANA MONIEVDHEE PURPLE TO G OG LANTANA I GAL LNG LANTANA NEW GOLD PREADSD YELLOW LANTANA I ML EDRB CFMA ROAN FMM SOMMW 5OUIDE1 AND SIDE LOO-Mo-MT 79RMom E M.M FOR 9m OUTTi MOAN aOD - T-! - DOM AMA 001PLBIl3Y, FROM 80UI MW 6OLCM AND STONE DO D®O mrErDECOl0®OMNIE air 1MS w/IQ FNEB- r DEPTK RACE N ALLRAMwA AFEA MM ormBWW NOrm PROAJ. NO R0624 DATES O2/13100 SCALE: r-SO'-w REYAMONe 1Q PER ARCH MID 07 © PER CMS_ O1.ILO7 © rM CM- OLI7.O7 PEFi CNL nmo7 PER ARCH 12.17.07 ® PER UPDATED MUMSITE PLAN SFEEi NOA pol SCALE: 1'=50' GRAPHIC SCALE Sp-1 ®' NIO SD 2S n Is !J M. ......... r✓ !� H H H 1 �r E., 4w 1 �1 `1 y .. WALL �S ENHANCED r' f�w1 0• '� ? PAVING yF l7 � Sr Riw-,p. L I �� ANNEEMIL ' . t*7M60 '&� GROUND COVER 9 MEDIUM SHRUB ACCENT SHRUB MEDIUM ACCENT SHRUB ROUSED PLANTER TTP. x4=., L SMALL \ SHRUB NORRi SCALE: 1'-10' GRAPHIC SCALE w ca a s o ley �.�< <;,� • �� _ �' -., DATE PALIA TYP. i I r 4i �l .I O i ., SEE SP-1 FOR PLANT PALETTE KEY MAP 7 7 9C.APE APAIVEem NC. 74020 ALESSA DW SME E PALL DEN3rr G 92M veal ea-" FAA Oe0) 77b-W E-MAL r0-9..-yd— I.L W U O Z 8 a-w �U U� Q� �g 00 � � < VJ 0 Z Q 3 cr F LL SPECFiCAT10N9 BFEEi❑ BOOK ❑ Pf10J. LIM RP ORAWN KC' C1ECKPD PROD. No FM2,4 DATE, 1211SM7 SCALE r-ler-W FEUSIOMS' n, UUrffr No SP-3 COBBLE ACCENT PLANT TYP. — 1 PRECAST CONCRETE CAP TYR--v FRONT VIEW A. FOUNTAIN STONE TILE PRECAST CONCRETE CAP STONE VENEER l B. CORNER FOUNTAIN SPILL WAY TYR — BOU LDER TYR MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM TYR MEDIUM ACCEN 1� SHRUB TYR GROUND COVER STONE VENEER STONE TILE WALL — STUCCO WALL T REAR VIEW MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM TYP. pi tic K:. NDRrr1 SCALE: 114'-1' GRAPHIC SCALE aaaaaaaa� aaa� � v • r r o -A. FOUNTAIN B. CORNER 0 FOUNTAIN KEY MAP LAfDeCAPE ManECTa NC. 74M AIESUNDRO, SLM E PALM WNW, CA 222W pao) Sea-x24 FAX 9e0) 773-5M -MAL rC—w7 do LL W U z O z (0 a z 0- = 0 �d O ILw/ vzg / z I� 4 w cr LL SPECIFlCATIONS SHEErO BOOK PRw. r4OR RP DRAWN KC C*eCKECa 12/16107 PROD. NO, R0624 DATE, SCALE: 114•-t-W R£NSpNS rno SP-4 x�u Rnu ------------ 3 �. uvwaov O� R ___________ _—_ _ _______________— _____________..._____ owve� "Villa CaprT SITE PLAN Mayer Corporation Exhibit Date: February 13, 20D9 �m ti 1 Deco VMSIIY MM 1 Lin, IvEdGm Bill �- ' � ♦ I ' I � �Sr � � .�_ J:,� TALI L � ^� , �,. I. � �.✓ ' `11' � - - " �."�,� , = `A �L fI � , y � I Lam: , ^I,., u`. Iry Inj f -. ...'k' `•rill SHEET INDEX n pErtnr'Ecr� �xw-w- N011lll n �: me iacKtn ewn� as elm Ms�x M A£idAL M CPS11W PEF51 i Au OYERALI e11E n.w AI$ PROiieeMaL111z�+r� eirE A Are AS! FAT LE1R1. ROAR FLW Ali OECQa LcV ROQx RNJ AS! FG[.4 PLAN AAl O3CIl"m MIEVATgtl 41 6XilFNGR WXVAT - C0.0R AU EXTEf 11E Al4 AAA ExTem— EIEVAr" COLOR AOJ BWLDlG ffcTIL fb PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTH & SHEET INDEX LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP g D G ARCHITECTS -•••-•-•• at11111 MSOM ill SO111 111 6 l I' � H n1((�1; IpI Milli k, [OIIIOIMIS f151f 11 G M1 111. f LA QUINTA P2 N,,,.... 1R(Hill[i� SM swwa loos s� �'l r NO, 7MM41.10 VIEWLINE SECTION RESIDENCE 4 _ _ VIEWLINE SECTION RESIDENCE 3 VIEVNNE SECTION RESIDENCE 7 VIEWLINE SECTION RESIDENCE 1 \` \ 13VALA 7I,u0 fif. o svIJ _ 751ONY KEY PLAN O i SCE t) M 1 I RIESWENCE f' n 03 1 REfID6110E 11 Sd _p LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE D U C H A It D DESIGN CROUP g DG a+ l LA QUINTA A1.11 ARCHITECTS lllll IIYY IIA1 fYlll 111 Y11111[, WUIIIYIIIAIIIII BlR'GHAlD UISIli� I�R(ILP LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE at LA QUINTA I KEYNOTES OI cam xAB O 6TEEL STRk:T11RA1 C " Ol FETAL IiLMFD OCrO 1OR WALL O LED GTOlE. GEE EMER ELEVATIDNG Oa R PUN LW.6 R1019 ABOVE O W CD=HE GE! EMfB110R ELEVATY * 0 6T01@RGM DCVIaASDaY.-G , GEE r.R.WIN LL A— Oi L:ANCpT ABO.£, SEE Ei%E9BOR ELEVAT AND 1V\ F'LA1N O " 04ADE ABOVE. WE DaERM ElEVAT1 AND RDOF RAN O I° 4WL% w ME AL COLT NORTH FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1W a Tff BURGHARD DESIGN GROUP BDG ARCHITECTS •R'G•I� E1111 NA 1014 HITS 111 MINIM, CAEIPoINIA 13111 IRnm Enaw Um lnna..1 ii I' R U IIISIG N G£it P A2.1 a sffrusa NooG tCf lftiI KEYNOTES I Oi � M- fN92lt AL MM �a e�FL sTRucnrrAL rtLlrTl p rs=Tx rRaeo EXIE]tlgt IULL Oi LEDff]e 6TPd<eEE E%fEWOR FLEVdTKM O ROCF ORAL' LIES R AW4 Oi SSLOW ✓ M SIN FIRE EaATI * Oi 6T016i07llf DOORNSOdS STSMI, a E%1Ei0At ELEVATIGNe Oe CANOPY AEOVE, SeE F%IERIpt ELEVATION YL 1OxF PL.W Oi PERFORATED 6W &IAOE OMM tOo S T ALiOVE SEE EM m FLEVATI ATO ACOF PLAN O IB�OF 490.£. EEF. E]RERM ELRVAT A.D IRJLF PLdN O BI1RT CdNOPT I¢aLF BELOW EFE FXIERK E ATI O anveo EFS-PNRAED PETAL SQPR Na SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP g D G at ARCHITECTS ••• •••• mll EON Iola MM III R U R G H A R D MINIM, [AIIICIMIA91516 DESIGV GRbE.P LA QU I NTA A2.2 eaNII�,-. �wIIIRI,IN C I . . �kHfT•f(1 0 NORTH I KEYNOTES Oi PETAL PARAPET Y LDPEY, GEE EXIE E.11-1 A5 Ot GTN M6 GER1 PETAL WD ,GEE GF3EIP.01 NGIE 4 (D cl. 1 I- lNLT-w Lml ft MTEK GEE C�H1l' tiOIE O4 BOYRENT GC,r&LM IGR.L Os MNGGI®! �G4 lff l]f1ERlOR pEVATIRE Os LEE W GIALL RAMW LE� O GG CMATEON vi 1 GRAM / Ovelw"w ORMI Oi "TER DIVBmIOR ORICT2T Op GL MOA I N1iN FEIER CONE GTRIP O RDs NATDN O LO IIGN M ELPVATM GNOFE Gl1GL O wV WITG D ma'-w T PLA� ROOF PLAN SCAM ve - YO LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP B DG ARCHITECTS at "",'NOR Eoµ ERTE TE1 C UL •R 6 H .A R U GIFH� GNTGEIIIA 11511 D I S I,\ G R G E� P LA QUINTA A2.3 -GI�as G�.,R.II1 ...... iR(IlliE[1i a �TrA�ec aooG SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION KEYNOTES O on®eae MLu?T AND IMTSlN➢ LTL (!Po). CPL DT61D1 AL M A Mf= BY Cf T S A LAID PEDDLE yf ( �a LTONE SH♦$iRALA bm nB ,r a MATETaLL LP 0s aO STATON' !VM CLEAR AMODIgD 19ANL LH ROR PLAM Alm IlEtl E' Q/ MATERWL LKBO CalAl O T£TLL PAR , CmwN fPE NEt'I £ QJ Fl41EFLAL LEOBID BELaS O PIE-ET_mM mE •S*acFz 'L LEE IIBT E' Q1 TTATERLL LESBD lE1Gm Q PfiN'NS4m ]'x4• ALVVAI, STag3RTTT DOOR am rd.wYa LrLTEM. Cl-AZMG TO M MMILAIED U IEa1fLS BT TMEaa ooTN A DdIiC Clear /Lao-E> wlnu OT 6PAIE O — Oi ]• NICN METLL RE&M WAAL . SEE nEM V O w S IECEYED ALOB.T, LEE 1r8 v QT I'IA1 LE BELOW O M.ANT® BALL AC .. L•E IT@T'c' QT MTE E LELEiID BELOW O � EaB'T7D1T LC@IT, L ITEM 'A' M MTEIBAL LECE10 BELOW O wNT TRFI SEE B t CM MaTEAAL LE M> _ O P/✓£aiIMED IETAL fJHOPY WE ITEM E' W MAl13LA1 Lrlm BF—M O SLANTm CCUeM Oa.ETa FM W TO MATCH CANOPY. LEE nel E c T T96LL MIND BELOW O CIRA� PI��WEO MEfLL SGiR, LEE LEc010 BOOR MOOT: PI/N A1ID 116•I E' aT MAIFRILL LGCda BELOW O PIEfSSMED 1 AL A Tm=wzu. iF.Al11FE, SSE IT'J4 F ON MATw_ � Q m MATERIAL LEGEND 0 POPLAR ILLAtO. NAIL - RLLPN LAISEM 0' TLosa® AU- "I . RALRI LAIAEN 0 reE C.'am aA+w - TfA1.FM LAIRQI O A�". TAKAIE,,W, - TlALJiI LAIIf�N O CLEAR Army LLU4 - UL ALWL M An O riwLL MA, - ou+I EOWI®S O[ TursxLn czrr4N. TW] - RCLPN LAMM Ox :. STa N3FER MANlAGTIIEIIARlIOTi (Gd N41 A CCTPNTT. MCJ COLLRIPAITETN C4fARB IMAM DRTLTAOG LFDf�RLTp� EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCAM We c 10 LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GRDUP BD at ARCHITECTS 71M EA I WAy HIT T u1 & U R G•II A R 0 ElSIIIE, OANISIEIA I. 0 E S I G LA Q U I NTA A4.1 "BIm,N1 {Rcni�lri� FRONT ELEVATION RRM-EEMMIDN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DSIGN GROUP B D G al ARCHITECTS •• ••-• lf9{N f N{NN {q 101 1 f Iq C. U R C H A R [} YFNIM, UUIOIN6ftfff UISICC CROUP LA QUINTA A4.2 �RCHIIICI� r seNa�elx moN 9 s EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION KEYNOTES Oi E'Yt1@EOR YBIAATOI AIa FNLLRY'. a 61.V (EPD]. EFe era1EM m rwYs+cTUFa R1T oRrvlr and eAro FrsaLE TRx1uYE Oi ATONE FACM sm nw w' m 14TE!!4L mov eYELOW Oi aTAlDN' NEAM PFEAE%ED FETAL IW70F NYTN CLE4i ARIL012m RYWaµ SEE ROOF PLAN bW REN E' ON FIATERSIL LEEBO BF101Y O FNFTAL PARAPET C_wE mA ITEf1 £ a T4TEiWAL LEttm BFLOO OS PIEfFa510 METAL swot mK SEE rtat T. m MATEFI4 LEfBD BELOW O P - Rmwp 1•K4. 44FNM STCI®# w DOOR AD GI.ALf eY61EFL f�Aill' TO BE YIBi./+TED A5 i£pIJ� BT TRLE-]4 NRTN A DAIK BRIT fLOWfJ RNBI Oi WAIN O aPAIE O ]• INf�! FETAL /EC1ET IEL'EAL .SEE R@1 C' LN FMTEYEAL LE6BD s A. O 14• eOIYE FELTiNS® ACGENT, EEE REM 'C ON FWTERW. 1.E000 Bsou '0' ELANTm NW.L IrmR, eEE � e oN wte3wlL LEBBo BELOW O LW�9NED EOR9'ENT Wn K eEE IT1 :A' oN MATM LEf�1D eELou O FOYI t3RL SEE RQ1'C W FYT3EAL LEA BELAY O PRE-RNESNEO FNRAL CJIEJPT . EEE fTEM E' ON MAT3t10L LEftTO mOW O RLMifED COLYYI C FIYGI w MATCM CANOPY. EEE REM £ m MATEIBAL LEEPC! pELCLI Q aNatn PIPE-waaN© FETAL eaFR, eFE EECRo rLaaz R05 PLAN AND REM E' ON FNTEFEAL LEL�O OFlOW O PIF-fi0[i� FETAL ARGNRECTIFIL F T w_ RARE R T. ON MA .a Me. B _ MATERIAL LEGEND O PORN! 15 A , W3 - RALM LAIEEN O ' IalT01® NALL T133 - RI.LPfI LAINQN Q DEEP fd'®1. G1Er0 - RALRI LI11ET1 O ice'.' TAKANE° T - 2tLFM1 LNNYEN O CLEAR AIYOIgD ALIK - ID AWIt OR KAN1ffR O LORAL _AT - G3a1 FOW3TAa O FY1S$iD COITILRL T112 - RALPN LAIIGEN Qx aroma: wEtx ;� �a FYNiACTEE: NARCSTCRE taa. uAlBnn rurANr, Irr;/ .. a.YBLB BNTAN DRTETADC LEDfBaTCNE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCAM VW RY-W LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP g aG al A I C H I T I C T S •. •. 21"1 RAIN Rou N SIM 1N1 F ll I L H A R S} Nook uWlonulnuR UESIGC LRGI P LA QUINTA A4.3 ', E.m'- ;RCHIii[i� RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE D SIICN GROUP g D G eRCHIiFCiS •••� at Hill ..V. 1414 tnn ur 1; l' k C H A G D ■mm, utrrcuunH. UFSIGI GRilIP LA QUINTA A4.4 m.mw,p n� I f T Q I BUILDING SECTION - A BUILDING SECTION - B BUILDING SECTIONS SCAM Ve -TO LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP g D►G ARCHITECTS ••• at11/11 MAN loA4 Will 111 N L+ V.(I -llllll, 1A11 'NIA 1A111 LA QUINTA >A5.1 a 1WIBAYB zoos A Exterior Walls Smooth Plaster Color. Ralph Lauren NA23 Poplar Island E Metal and Accents Color. Clear Anodized Alum US Alum. or Kawneer B Exterior Wak Smooth Plaster Color. Ralph Lauren TH33 Rufford Hall F Exterior Walls Smooth Plaster Color. Dun Edwards DEC719 Coral Clay C Exterior Walls Smooth Plaster Color. Ralph Lauren GH60 Deep Green G Exterior Walls Accents Color. Ralph Lauren TH32 Mayfield Common D Exterior Walls Smooth Plaster Color. Ralph Lauren TH37 Takahe H Exterior Walls Stone Veneer Manuf: Harristone Color. Chablis Uintah Pattem Ledgestone LIVING WATERS MEDICAL -PROFESSIONAL CENTRE DESIGN GROUP B � G ARCHITECTS MATERIALS BOARD at IV"uw am w { K G• .� It D �emc, arrow gun R E SIGN' I G\ G R O I. P LA QUINTA .�'�' pm"°.�' ..... .(F z6(HIl(� 7f �IP� y0i ATTACHMENT # 3 .'+5 k � Y'. i I i� I - _ _' I .- � `' �� y�.,,'�"} ` \� � ,', � •. ` i-''T �- 7 -�� WM�.�JNrli'JOOr ,,fy �'� J� �.• SY yti� , 1k,��' ; OdM Wn9NFOFGV�tliM� ?' P, + �• f �r �^ �- - ' S - ,t e` 1 �� TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.35MB � ( � I � L - ,! �i � '`1'• +�l l �� 1 � •Y � o1Ti�t�i�afuo "` .. •11{ t , It Ilk 'A , to aP 4tfd{@IfFy �' f I � Ir i 4 t1 •� L_� \ ... .i t .�1:� �u�t ' i..,-•i �.oK 4 3,,. .1j ar - 1 .�`'� \ \� •• C, '. T , `mm ae.o xnwra mA J 1 { ��+` ti Falb � � • 1� ' .+¢� �� - f-��..r �'� • t i � -` _ _ .. _ _ � - - -- - -" - `` , c" '-•`.s. , < ,�.... f-,� w�wwlrrclQnrst�? �. �.«.. _.•. ...r. � _ - _- - - -ANI SITE PLAN I PARCEL MAP OVERLAY d _Y ^scnpan� Camun{!~. ca