9705-099 (CCOM)LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of
Chapter 9,(commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and
Professionals Code, and my License is in full force and'effect.
License # Lic. Class % Exp. Date
f,d7RfK A C8 o1331 RAI
Date Signature of Contractor
i
OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractor's
License Law for the following reason:
( ) I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole
compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for
sale (Sec. 7044, Business & Professionals Code).
( ) 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed
contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business & • Professionals
Code).
( ) I am exempt under Section , B&P.C. for this reason
Date Signature of Owner
WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
( ) I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers'
compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the
performance of the work for which this permit is issued.
-�<) I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by
Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this
permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier & policy no. are:
Carrier Policy No.
t►114.17 UNIT Qt►) I #1t
(This section need not be completed if the permit valuation is for $100.00 or less).
() I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued,
I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the
workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that if I should become
subject to the workers' compensationprovisions of Section 3700 o - f -t - he Labor
jCode, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.
d Date: Applicant
f
Warning: Failure to secure Workers' Compensation coverage is unlawful and
shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to $100,000, in
addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706
of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's fees.
IMPORTANT Application is hereby made to the Director of Building and Safety
for a permit subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth on his
application.
1. Each person upon whose behalf this application is made & each person at
whose request and for whose benefit work is performed under. or pursuant to
any permit issued as a result of this applicaton agrees to, & shall, indemnify
& hold harmless the City of La Quinta, its officers, agents and employees.
2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if
work is not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of such
-permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject permit to cancellation.
I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is
correct. I agree to comply with all. City, and State laws relating to the building
construction, and hereby authorize, representatives of this City to enter upon
t e above-mentioned property for inspection purposes.,
Si nature (Owner/A ent) '- -- - I,,/• �E /. - Date
• BPERMIT# CONTROL#
BUILDING PERMIT 740-4199 5142
DATE'�/Itt+li�7 VALUATION S39,9410.0LOT TRACT
r
DRESS 7"50 A'4 ENIDA LA VONDA JOB SITE
ADDRESS
OWNER
CONTRACTOR / DESIGNER / ENGINEER
CITY 01, LA Qt)RUA
i:ONTR SMAS CONS 17=110rr CO
78-495 CALLS TAMPIC O .
P.O. BOX 1808
LA QUINTA CA 02751
MAO CA 42201
(•7'60' 1417.6070 C ILk
USE OF PERMIT
t t AiM
VW�:.(. t'111C1't.�1t`I i til{ tihNll�lt �TtsNyt iii4 �'llltj:tTlCi iti r►2vSliON.
- If.V '1tttlA't'ED CE.18T 01.I` (XJN.STi!.1JC 1'100
3 fl!►J.i�i1
119kfll#`1' 11011I%N!JAIMA14V.
8UIV1TYTA1,C'ONKM1K I`ON;ANf)VI,ANCIIPCK
�f1t1f?
'i't) AII, i"i".RMIT t+'I:KS 94W NOW
7
RECEIPT
DATE
BY
DATE FINALED
INSPECTOR
INSPECTION- RECORD
OPERATION
DATE
INSPECTOR
OPERATION
DATE
INSPECTOR
BUILDING APPROVALS
MECHANICAL APPROVALS
Set Backs
Underground Ducts
Forms & Footings
Ducts
Slab Grade
Return Air
Steel
Combustion Air
Roof Deck
Exhaust Fans
O.K to Wrap
F.A.U.
Framing
Compressor
Insulation
Vents
Fireplace P.L.
Grills
Fireplace T.O.
Fans & Controls
Party Wali Insulation
Condensate Lines
Party Wall Firewall
Exterior Lath
Drywall - Int. Lath
C4
Final
Final
POOLS - SPAS
—
BLOCKWALL AP ROVALS
steel
Set Backs
Electric Bond
Footings
Main Drain
Bond Beam
Approval to Cover
Equipment Location
Underground Electric
Underground Plbg. Test
Final I
Gas Piping
PLUMBING APPROVALS
Gas Test
Electric Final
Waste Lines
Heater Final
Water Piping
Plumbing Final
Plumbing Top Out
Equipment Enclosure
Shower Pans
O.K. for Finish Plaster
Sewer Lateral
Pool Cover
Sewer Connection
Encapsulation
Gas Piping
Gas Test
Appliances
Final
COMMENTS:
Final
Utility Notice (Gas)
ELECTRICAL APPROVALS
Temp. Power Pole -
Underground Conduit
Rough Wiring
Low Voltage Wiring
Fixtures
Main Service
Sub Panels
Exterior Receptacles
G.F.I.
Smoke Detectors
Temp. Use of Power
Final
Utility Notice (Perm)
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:, �Se't.ember,,21, 1993
ITEM TITLE:
Consider Award of Coritfact for Senior
Center 'Sitework
SUMMARY:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
5
One bid was received on September 16 for the Senior Center sitework in the amount of $392,289 from
James T. Dunphy Company. However, an error in two of the extended amounts of unit prices for Site
Improvements, Items 10 and 11 (Attachment A), changes the actual bid amount to $393,899.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY: -7-&
—
Available in the project budget is $98,207. Total cost, with contingency, is $413,594, therefore, an
additional allocation of $315,387 will be required from the Infrastructure Fund Reserve of $1.1 million
to provide for the contract amount plus contingency.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Award a contract to the James T. Dunphy Company in the Amount of $393,899.
2. Authorize allocation of $31.5,387 from the Infrastructure Find to the Senior Center project fund.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signa.
FRR/ld
Robert. L. Hunt, City Manager
000114W
P
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Frank R. Reynolds, Director of Public Works/Ci.ty Engineer
DATE: September 21; 1993
SUBJECT: Contract Award to Construct Senior Center Sitework
ISSUE:
One bid was received for the referenced project on September 16. The issue for the Council to consider
is the award of a contract to the only bidder.
BACKGROUND:
Tile original bid call for the Senior Center included both the building and the sitework. At the August
3 City Council. meeting, the Council awarded a contract for the building only and directed the staff to
scale down the sitework portion of the project, have it re -advertised, and return to the Council with
bids.
ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT:
The bid opening for the sitework was held September 16, and only one bid was received. That bid was
submitted by James T. Dunphy Co. of Palm Springs in the amount of $393,899. Dunphy also was the
successful bidder on the building portion. of the Senior Center improvements. Dunphy's previous bid
for the sitework was for $567,539 before it was scaled down.
Receipt of only a single bid is disappointing, but in comparing the unit prices contained within that bid
with the unit prices received previously for the site improvements and the Engineer's Estimate of
approximately $350,000, the bid received is considered reasonable.
000113
The following bid totals are itemized on the attached bid sheet (Attachment A):
Base Bid Amount $393,899.00
Elective Additives 237,282.73
Total Bid Amount
The base bid provides the Senior Center with comparable site improvements to that of the Civic Center.
As noted in the Supplemental Staff Report dated August 3, 1993, the budget for the Senior Center
project is as follows:
Infrastructure Funds $1,114,986
CBDG 500,014
$1,615,000
The proposed expenditures already authorized for the building portion of the contract areas follows:
Building Contract
$1,310,159
Design Services (FY 92-93)
87,600
Engineering Services
112,500
Geotechnical Services
6,714
$1,516,973
This leaves a balance in the project budget of $98,207.
Therefore an additional allocation is needed
to proceed with the sitework.
Bid Amount
$393,889
5% Contingency _
19,695
Funds Needed
411,594
Funds Available
98,207
Additional Allocation Needed
$315,387
The Infrastructure Fund is estimated to have a $1.1 million dollar fund balance at the end of this fiscal
year (6/30/94). Therefore, staff is recommending that the Infrastructure Fund be utilized for the
additional appropriation.
RECOMMENDATION:
I . Award a contract to the James T. Dunphy Company in the Amount of $392,289.
2. Authorize allocation of $315,387 from the Infrastructure Fund to the Senior Center project fund.
n n 4 1 A
ATTACHMENT A
BID
SENIOR CENTER SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 93-07
Bid Items
I).
Grading and Paving
80,260.00
2)
Sewer
13,433.00
.3)
Water Offsite (CVWD Work)
34,416.00
4)
Electrical/Cable/Telephone
8,630.00
5)
Gas Service (provided by The Gas Company)
-0-
0-
6)
6)
Water Onsite
2,705.00
7)
Hardscape and'Landscape
254,455.00•
BASE BID AMOUNT $393,899.00
Alternative Bid Items
1)
Landscape Lighting
53,577.84
2)
Site Hardscape
88,716.63
3)
Entry Walls
49,251.57
4)
Entry Area & Walk Irrigation
6,730.01
5)
Entry Area & Walk Landscaping
39,006.68
ALTERNATIVE BID ITEMS
r
$237,282.72
000 jj�)
ATTACHMENT A
BID
SENIOR CENTER SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 93-07
Bid Items
1) Grading and Paving 80,260.00
2) Sewer a 13,433.00
3) Water Offsite (CVWD Work) 34,416.00
4) Electrical/Cable/Telephone 8,630.00
5) Gas Service (provided by -The Gas Company) - 0 -
6) Water Onsite. 2,705.00
7) Hardscape and Landscape 254,455.00
BASE BID AMOUNT $393,899.00
Alternative Bid Items
1)
Landscape Lighting
53,577.84
2)
Site Hardscape '
88,716.63
3)
Entry Walls .
49,251.57
4)
Entry Area & Walk Irrigation
6,730.01
5)
Entry Area & Walk Landscaping
39,006.68
ALTERNATIVE BID ITEMS $237,282.72
000116
FM
SECTION 1210
i1D SCHEDULE
LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER
STTEWORK IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 93-07
City of La Quints
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quints, CA 92253
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the Invitation to Bid, the undersigned hereby proposes and agrees that on award by the City under this Bid, and in'
accordance with the provisions therein stated, to execute a Contract, with necessary bonds, to furnish and install any and all labor,
materials, transportation, and services for the construction of the LA QUINTA SENIOR CENTER SITEWORK
I111PROVEN ENTS, PROJECT NO. 93-07, in accordance'with the Plans and Specifications therefor adopted and on file with the
City within the time hereinafter set forth and at the prices named in this Bid as follows:
SITEWORK MPROVEh1ENTS
Item Item Description Qty Unit Unit Total
No. Cost
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
IL
Rid Ghadula
1-10.1
GRADING AND PAVING
Site Grading
L.S.
L.S.
S 3, Lf yD l $ 30 t4 YO —
6' Type D. Curb
832
L. F.
$ 5. 3 S S —7 1 7 y"
Type A-6 Curb & Gutter
445
L. F.
S 10. 4 S `S`Zi �=s
Asphaltic Concrete 3"
470
TON
$
Asphaltic Concrete 2 112'
94
TON
$ 3b• cv $_ 33S34 -
3S34Aggregate
Aggregate Base Class II 6 112'
500
C.Y.
S X3.35 S_ 15 "
Aggregate Base Class 11 5"
93
C. Y.
S 13,'5 S_ t, qy I S'
Catch Basin Riv: Co. Std. No. 300 1
Ea.
$ 4Q is - $ y Z l S
Brooks 1818 T12 Catch Basin
3
Ea.
S to 3. D J $_ a, D 19 "
6' A. C. Berm
230
L. F.
$
Handicap Access Ramp
6
Ea.
$
JJ -
--�
opt 1J -S
Rid Ghadula
1-10.1
1.
2.
3.
4.
SEWER
6' V. C, P. Sewer 502 L. F. $
4 V.C.P. Sewer 82 L.F. $
6' Cleanout 6 Ea. $
4" Cleanout 1 Ea. f n.'7, 0J
1. • 8" CML/CMC or 8" D.I./P
CML Water Main
2. 6' CML/CMC or D.I.P./
CML Water Main
3. 6' Fire Hydrant Assembly
4. 8" Gate Valve
5. 6" Gate Valve
6. 6' Detector Check Assembly
7. 1' Service
8. 1 1/2' Service
9. 2' Service W/I 1/2' Meter
WATER OFFSITE (CVWD WORK)
780 L.F.
$_ Ill. as-
ELECTRICAL/C A BLE/TELEPHONE
s- :)a �/--
S H a3'
$-
s l,g3z-
f I O S:L
f_ 3 SI
s ylo -
$ `7100 -
1. 4' PVC Schedule 40 Sleeves 1040 a L. F. S i . Dp S- -1 8 D'
2. 2' P.VC Schedule 40 Sleeves 180 L.F. f
63 � >
GAS SERVICE
1. Natural Gas Service 1 L. S. s s �'
t
Bid Schedule U O O 118 1.101
Sa
1 Ea.
$ a 9
3 Ea.
$ - LP `I y `
2 Ea.
$ 5-L6-
1 Ea.
1 Ea.
S ylp-
1 Ea.
1 Ea.
f `[ (o O-
ELECTRICAL/C A BLE/TELEPHONE
s- :)a �/--
S H a3'
$-
s l,g3z-
f I O S:L
f_ 3 SI
s ylo -
$ `7100 -
1. 4' PVC Schedule 40 Sleeves 1040 a L. F. S i . Dp S- -1 8 D'
2. 2' P.VC Schedule 40 Sleeves 180 L.F. f
63 � >
GAS SERVICE
1. Natural Gas Service 1 L. S. s s �'
t
Bid Schedule U O O 118 1.101
WATER ONSITiE
1. 6' Post Indicator Valve I Ea. $
2. 6' C-900 PVC Water Main 95 L.T. $
3. 2' Water Main 95 L. F. $ (o. Do S SZd
o
HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE
1. Site Lighting 1 L.S.
2. Building Patios & Sidewalks 1' L.S. S Q3 'g30 - $ 83 $30
3. Patio Walls and Railing I L.S. S 13 , moo - $
4. Landscape & Irrigation Installation I L.S. S 1 S `1 a (200
5. 90 Day Maintenance Period I L.S. S b SO
La 5 4S5
SITE IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BID ANIO $
g99
NOTE: The estimate quantities listed in the Proposal Bid Sheet(s) above are supplied to give an indication of the work, ut
the accuracy of these figures is not guaranteed and the bidder shall make his own estimates from the drawings. In the case
of a variation between the unit price and the totals shown by the bidder, the unit price will be considered to be the bid.
ALTERNATIVE DESCRIPTION NET ADDITIONS
BID NO.
S'3+ 8 y
1. Landscape Lighting $ S -7 1
2. t Site Hardscape
S?
3. Entry Walls S 49 �LS
4. Entry Area & Walk Irrigation
b3
5. Entry Area and Walk Landscaping $ Do to
a 31, a$a a�
Bid amount of each of the above bid items. must be filled in and completed.
` nn
Name of Bidder
Co�ltif.� t� Q,
RidGbaddo 00011,9
Y
Lam /I
S
�OF7N�v
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:'i August- 3,'1993
ITEM TITLE•
Consideration of-ontract Award, to
Construct- the Senior Center,E
SUMMARY:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
BUSINESS SESSION:___
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
This project is scheduled to be constructed during the 1993-94
fiscal year. The Council authorized a call for bids for this
project at the June 15 meeting. A notice inviting bids was
published July 9 -and July 16 with a bid date of August 2 at 10:00
a.m., the day before the Council meets to consider this item.
Since the bids will be received subsequent to the preparation of .
this staff report, a supplemental staff report will be made
available to the Council.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
The total budget for the project is $1,512,500. Funds are
available in the FY 1993-94 Budget.
RECOMMENDATION•
The recommendation will be included in the supplemental staff
report to.be issued on August 3, 1993.
Submitted by:
igna
FRR/ld .
Approved for submission to
City Council
Robert L. Hunt, City Manager
-A
1,
TWif 4 4(4j Q*&
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: August 3, 1993
RE: Contact Award to Construct Senior Center
ISSUE
The plans and specifications have been circulated to prospective bidders. The bid results will
be provided to the Council in a supplemental staff report. The issue for the Council to consider
is the award• of contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
BACKGROUND
The construction of the Senior Center is estimated at a total cost of $1,512,500. Included in the
project budget are funds for design and construction of building,. parking, landscaping, lighting,
fixtures and equipment, which includes such items as plumbing and lighting fixtures and heating
and air condition equipment. Within the $1,615,000 CIP Budget are two sources of funding:
The Infrastructure Fund ($1,114,986) and CDBG ($500,014). It should be. noted that furniture
is not included in the bid package. .Bids will be analyzed and the analysis will be presented in
the supplemental staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
The recommendation, will be included in the supplemental report.
/ld
TO:
FROM
DATE:
BUSINESS SESSION NO. 5
MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 3, 1993
RE: Supplemental Staff Report on Consideration of
Contract Award to Construct the Senior Center
ISSUE
Bids were received for the subject project on August 2. The issue for the Council to consider
is the award of a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.
BACKGROUND
The Council authorized a call for bids at its June 15 meeting. In view of the time involved in
publishing the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, getting the contract documents ready for distribution,
and given the summer Council meeting schedule, it was determined that in order to give the
bidders the longest bidding time possible, the bid opening would be scheduled for the day before
the August 3 Council meeting. Provided to tile, Council is the Supplemental Staff Report.
ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT'
Three (3) bids were received from the following firms in the stated amounts:
.lames T. Dunphy Co, Palm .Springs $1,767,109.00
Williams -Hedley Joint Venture, Palm Desert $1,797,172.70
Le Bouef Company, Inc., Anaheim $1,923,944.70
Therefore, the lowest responsible bidder is James T. Dunphy Company, at $1,767,109.00. As
noted in the staff report contained in the Council August 3 packet, the cost had been estimated
at $1,512,500.
It will be recalled that the project was bid according to two schedules, one bid for the building
itself and the second for the sitework. In analyzing the bids received, it is readily apparent that
the sitework portion of the project was significantly underestimated and is the cause for the
discrepancy. The sitework, as proposed, included extensive hardscape and landscaping which
is in excess of that required to make the Senior Center functional. It was an effort on the
desi no's part to tie the Senior Center into the ultimate plan for the landscaping and
improvements for the entire Civic Center site. In view of the costs involved, it now appears to
be more desirable to include those amenities in subsequent phases of the general areas
development. The low bid for the building portion also was submitted by James Dunphy in the
amount of $1,199,570.00, which is more in line with the architect's estimate:
Estimate Bid
Building 1,050,000 1,199,570
Sitework 364,000 567,539
The variation which does exist between the building estimate and bid can be accounted for by
the fact that lumber prices have increases by at least 60% since the estimate was made.
In view of the budget constraints, it appears that there are two.courses of action which could be
taken:
1. Reject all bids, scale down the sitework portion of the project and re -advertise.
2. Eliminate the sitework portion of the project and award a contract for the
construction of the building only. Scale .down the sitework portion and re -
advertise it as a separate project at the earliest opportunity.
Although it was disappointing that only three bids were received, the closeness of the two low
bids would indicate a degree of competitiveness; therefore, it is unlikely that re -advertising
would materially affect the price of the building itself. Further, it would delay the project since
the next Council meeting will not be until September 21, at which time an award would be
considered. I
The better of the two alternatives would be to proceed with the award of the building contract.
This option has been discussed with the low bidder, and he is not opposed to going forward on
that basis. In doing so, however, it may develop that some contract change orders will have to
be negotiated to perform certain work integral to the function of the building which originally
were included in the sitework portion of the project (i.e. water and sewer hook-ups). On the
other hand, this may not be necessary if the timing of the scaled-down sitework project can be
coordinated to install certain facilities when they are required. It would be the staff's intention
to make the necessary changes to the sitework as expeditiously as possible and re -advertise so
that an award could be considered either at the September 21 Council meeting or at the next
meeting thereafter. In any event, the sitework will not be allowed to adversely impact progress
on the building.
BUDGET:
Infrastructure Funds . $ 1,114,986
CDBG 500,014
$ 1,615,000
EXPENDITURES:
Building Contract $1,310,159
Design Services (FY 92-93) 87,600
Engineering Services 112,500
Geotech Services 6.714
Balance $ 98,027
* $1,199,570 Base Bid + $48,200 Kitchen equipment + $62,389 - 5% Contingency
Should the Council decide to proceed with an award of the building contract, there are some
additional factors which should be taken into consideration:
Should an award be made, it should be made subject to the approval of the
Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). It is required by EDA
that they review the bids prior to the execution of a contract (because it involves
the use of Federal funds). Since their, concern is with the building only, it would
not seem to be a problem in postponing the sitework.
2. The involvement with Federal money in any project produces contract
administration requirements not normally encountered in a public works project.
It will be absolutely necessary to maintain impeccable records, and toward this
end staff recommends amending Harris and Associates contract to provide
construction management services for the project. Harris has proposed to staff
the project with Michael Errante, the office engineer on the Civic Center project,
at a cost of $12,500 per month. Anticipating a 9 -month construction period, the
total estimated cost would be $112,500.
3. The project will need geotechnical consulting services, and staff has asked Earth
Systems Consultants, the same materials testing firm which provided services for
the Civic Center, to sub►nit a proposal. Their quote is on a time and materials
basis and is estimated at $6,714.
a
4. The low bid for the additive alternate to provide and install kitchen facilities was
$48,200. - In view of the difficulties involved in making the installation
subsequent to the completion of the building, it would be desirable to add this into
the contract at this time.
Additional funding from the Infrastructure Fund may be recovered from the
sitework ($98,000 in available funds). The Infrastructure Fund is anticipated to
have an ending Fund Balance (June 1994) of $1,212,685. Thus the anticipated
additional cost can be accommodated.
RECOMMENDATION
The following recommendations are made' with respect t this project.:
1. Award a contract, subject to the approval of the Riverside County Economic
Development Agency,. for the building portion only to James T. Dunphy
Company in the amount of .$1,199,570.00 plus $48,200.00 for the kitchen
equipment.
2. Authorize an amendment to Harris and Associates contract for office engineering
services in the amount of $12,500 per month.
3. Authorize entering into an agreement with Earth Systems Consultants for
'geotechnical services at an estimated cost of $6,714.
4. Direct staff to scale down the sitework portion of the project and return to
Council at the earliest opportunity.
/]d
oject: La Quinta Senior Center
CONTRACT
BID
SUMMARY
Page of
oject No. 92-6
Igineer's Estimate: $1.1 Million
Design Consultant
Firm: Walling &
McCallum
TKD Associates
d Date: 8/2/93 Time: 2:00
p.m.
Total No. of Bidders: 3
James T.
Dunphy Co.
WilLiams-Hedley
Le 8ouef
Co., Inc.
Palm Springs, Ca
Joint
Venture
Anaheim,
CA
Palm Desert, CA
EM NO. :: DESCRIPTION
::ESTIMATED:
::
UNIT
:;
UNIT
UNIT
::QUANTITY
UNITS
PRICE
AMOUNT
::
PRICE
AMOUNT
::
PRICE
AMOUNT
----------------
TEWORK IMPROVEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------
GRADING AND PAVING
1 ::Site Grading
1 :
L.S.
29,500.00 :
29,500.00
:.
16,000.00 :
16,000.00
:
5,500.00
5,500.00
2 ::611 Type D. Curb
880 :
L.F.
8.90
7,832.00
:.
8.50
7,480.00
:
6.30
5,544.00
3 ::Type A-G Curb S Gutter
575
L.F.
10.00
5,750.00
:.
9.50
5,462.50
:
7.60 :
4,370.00
4 ::Asphaltic Concrete
470:
TONS
34.30
16,121.00
:.
29.50
13,865.00
33.00
15,510.00
5 ::Aggregate Base Class II
573 :
C.Y.
13.00
7,449.00
:_
11.40
6,532.20
:.
27.50
15,757.50
.6 ::Catch Basin Riv. Co. Std. #300
1 :
EA.
4,000.00
4,000.00
:_
4,200,00
4,200.00
3,080.00
3,080.00
7 ::Brooks 1818 T12 Catch Basin
3
EA.
640.00
1,920.00
:_
700.00
2,100.00
:
659.00
1,977.OD
13 ::611 A.C. Berm
55 :
L-F_
7.80
429.00
:.
7.00
385.00
:
17.20 :
946.00
14 ::Handicap Access Ramp
5
EA_
165.00
825.00
::
550.00
2,750.00
::
604.00
3,020.00
SEWER
1 ::6" V.C.P. Sewer
502 :
L.F.
20.00
10,040.00
:.
17.50
8,785.00
26.90
13,503.80
2 ::411 V_C.P_ Sewer
82 :
L.F_
15.50
1,271.00
:.
15.00
1,230.00
:.
19.20
1,574.40
3 ::611 Cleanout
6 :
EA.
220.00
1,320.00
:.
425.00
2,550.00
901.00
5,406.00
4 ::4" Cleanout
1 :
EA_
165.00
165.00
:.
400.00
400.00
::
879.00 :
879.00
WATER OFFSITE (CVWD WORK)
• 1 ::811 CML/CMC or 8t1 D.I.P./
CML Water Main
890
L.F.
27.90 :
24,831.00
:.
17.50
15,575.00
:
19.20
17,088.00
2 ::611 CML/CMC or D.I.P/
CML Water Main
18
L.F.
22.00
396.00
25.00
450.00
27.50
_
495.00
3 ::611 Fire Hydrant Assembly
2
EA.
2,790.00
5,580.00
:.
2,465.00
4,930.00
:
2,710.00 :
5,420,00
4 ::811 Gate Valve
2
EA.
615.00 :
1,230.00
:.
800.00
1,600.00
:.
879.00
1,758.00
5 ::611 Gate Valve
3 :
EA.
500.00
1,500.00
:.
725.00
2,175.00
:_
797.00
2,391.00
6 ::611 Detector Check Assembly
:
1
EA.
3,350.00
3,350.00
:.
1,475.00 :
1,475.00
1,620.00
1,620.00
7 ::111 Air b Vacuum Relief Valves
2
EA.
670.00
1,340.00
:.
885.00 :
1,770.00
972.00 :
1,944.00
8 ::111 Service
1
EA.
390.00
390.00
:.
605.00
605.00
665.00
665.00
9 ::1 1/211 Service
IEA.
558.00
558.00
:,
725.00 :
725.00
:_
797.00
797.00
10 ::211 Service w/1 1/211 Meter
1 :
EA.
725.00
725.00
:,
865.00 :
865.00
:.
950.00
950.00 :.
ELECTRICAL
1 ::ELECTRICAL SERVICE
1
L.S.
22,000.00
22,000.00
::
17,771.00
17,771.00
::
11,000.00
11,000.00
GAS SERVICE
1 ::Natural Gas Service
1
L.S_
0.00
0.00
:.
0.00
0.00
:_
2,750.00 :
2,750.00 :.
)ject: La Quinta Senior Center
CONTRACT
BID
SUMMARY
Page of
No. 92-6
ive
jineeN s Estimate: $1.1 Million
Design Consultant
Firm: Walting &
McCallum
TKD Associates
I Date: 8/2/93 Time: 2:00
p.m.
Notal No_ of Bidders: 3
James T.
Dunphy Co.
W1 liams-Hedley
Le Bouef
Co., Inc.
Palm Springs, Ca
Joint Venture
Anaheim,
CA
Palm
Desert, CA
:M N0. :: DESCRIPTION
::ESTIMATED:
::
-:.
UNIT
'
UNIT
-UNIT
= ::QUANTITY : UNITS
PRICE
AMOUNT
PRICE
AMOUNT
-.
::
PRICE
AMOUNT
WATER ONSITE
1 ::6" Post Indicator Valve
2 ::6" C-900 PVC•Water Main
1 :
95
EA.
950.00
950.00
:.
900.00
: 900.00
181.00 :
181.00
3 ::2" Water Main
95
L.F.
11-00
1,045.00
:_
18.00
; 1,710.00
:
31.40 :
2,983.00
L.F.
5.60:
532.00
:.
3-00
: 285.00
:.
29.00 :
2,755.00 :.
HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE
1 ::Site Lighting
2 ::Building Hardscape
1 :
1
L.S.
94,800.00
94,800.00
:.
68,886.00
: 68,886.00
:
85,700.00 :
85,700.00
3 ::Patio Walls•& Railing
1
L.S.
L.S.
27,240.00
9,240.00 :
27,240.00
9,240.00
:_
69,266.00
8,282.00
: 69,266.00
76,100.00 :
76,100.00
4 ::Site Hardscape
1
L.S.
._
83,195.00 :
83,195.00
:.
:.
96,000.00
: 8,282.00
: 96,000.00
:
9,100.00 :
157,500.00 :
9,100.00
157,500.00
5 ::Entry Watts
6 ::Landscape Irrigation
.1
1
L_S_
50,775.00
50,775.00
:_
16,800.00
: 16,800.00
18,500.00 :
18,500.00
7 ::Landscape Installation
:
1
L.S.
L.S.
126,000.00
23,900.00
126,000.00
23,900.00
:.
::
29,642.00
112,931.00
: 29,642.00
112,931.00
:
35,200.00 :
135,900.00
35,200.00
8 ::90 Day Maintenance Period
I
L.S.
1,340.00
1,340.00
:.
1,200.00
1,200.00
:
:.
:
1,980.00 :
135,900.00
1,980.00 :.
::SITE IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BID AMT.::
567,539.00
:.
525,582-70
::
649,844.70
---1- BUILDING CONSTRUCTION (BASE BID)=======1=====L.S.1,199,570.001,271;590.001,274,100.00
____
-
SITE IMPROVEMENTS - TOTAL BID
567,539.00
::
525,582.70
::
649,844.70
BLDG. CONSTRUCTION TOTAL BID
1,199,570.00
::
1,271,590.00
::
1,274,100.00
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
1,767,109.00
::
1,797,172.70
:;
1,923,944.70
ALTERNATES
1 ::Kitchen Equipment
2 ::Dual Glazing
48,200.00
:.
55,320.00
:.
46,000.00
3 ::Occupancy Sensors
14,350.00
3,100.00
:.
:.
8,100.00
6,380.00
:
8,750.00
4 ::A/C Unit M_Z. Controls
7,420.00
:.
11,800.00
:
:.
2,430.00
12,744.00
5 ::Demand Control ventilation
4,100.00
:
1,969.00
:.
12,000.00
6 ::Vinyl Wait Covering Finish
9,400.00
:.
1,845.00
:.
7,436.00 ::