The URL can be used to link to this page

2013 11 26 PCPlanning Commission agendas and staff reports are now available on the City's web page: www.la-guinta.org PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2013 AT 7:00 P.M. Beginning Resolution No. 2013-028 CALL TO ORDER 1 . Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the minutes of November 12, 2013. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Secretary prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1 NOVEMBER 26, 2013 you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. Site Development Permit 2013-930, as previously reviewed under Environmental Assessment 2002-457, submitted by Toll Brothers Inc. proposing the construction of 70 single family dwellings within Stone Creek Ranch, a 29-acre tract with 76 single-family residential lots and five existing homes. Location: north side of Avenue 58, ± 1 /2 mile west of Madison Street. 2. Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 and a determination of exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15304.4(e), submitted by Tait & Associates, Inc. proposing to allow the temporary placement and use of five temporary metal storage containers during the 2013 Holiday season for the La Quinta Wal-Mart store. Location: The Centre at La Quinta commercial center, south of Highway 111 between La Quinta Centre Drive and Dune Palms Road, 79295 Highway 1 1 1 . CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL COMMISSIONER ITEMS Report on City Council meeting of November 19, 2013. 2. Commissioner Weber is scheduled to attend the December 3, 2013, City Council meeting. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on December 10, 2013, commencing at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, Secretary of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting was posted on the inside of the north entry to the La Quinta Civic Center at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at 78-630 Highway 1 1 1 , and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on November 22, 2013. Undeliverable PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 NOVEMBER 26, 2013 DATED: November 21, 2013 MONIKA RADEVA, ecretary City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Commission, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Secretary for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development Department's counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 NOVEMBER 26, 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2013 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Chairperson Barrows. PRESENT: Commissioners Blum, Weber, Wilkinson, Vice Chair Wright, and Chairperson Barrows ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Les Johnson, Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Principal Planner Wally Nesbit, Associate Planner Jay Wuu, City Attorney Kathy Jenson, and Secretary Monika Radeva Chairperson Barrows led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of October 22, 2013, as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Conditional Use Permit 201 1-136 submitted by Lowe's HIW, Inc. proposing permanent outdoor display and sales area for the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. Location: Washington Park commercial retail center; 78-865 Highway 1 1 1, La Quinta. Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Chairperson Barrows noted for the record that staff had distributed a Memorandum to the Commission indicating that due to further collaboration with the applicant Condition of Approval No. 15 had been amended. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 7:13 p.m. Mr. Jesus Uccles, Store Manager of Lowe's HIW, Inc., La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, explained the purpose and intent behind the proposal and the types of merchandise to be displayed, and answered the Commission's questions. Chairperson Barrows asked Mr. Uccles if he was in agreement with the amendment to Condition of Approval No. 15. Mr. Uccles replied he was. Public Speaker: None Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:16 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Weber/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2013-024 approving Conditional Use Permit 201 1-136, as submitted with staff's recommendations and amending Condition of Approval No. 15 to read as follow: 15. Permanent improvements shall be added to the trailer sales area in order to indicate to customers that the parking spaces utilized for trailer sales are not for customer parking. Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, painted stripes, permanent bollards, and additional landscaping for screening purposes within the existing landscape planter adjacent to the trailer sales area. Design specifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to trailers being located within the sales area. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Tentative Tract Map 36537 and Site Development Permit 2013-924 submitted by Rembold Properties, LLC. proposing the land division of 41.95 acres and the construction of 230 new single family attached and detached units, and related project amenities and improvements. Location: in the PGA West development, along the north and east side of PGA Boulevard, west of the Stadium clubhouse on the former PGA West resort core site. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Principal Planner Wally Nesbit presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 7:28 p.m. Public Speaker: Mr. Wayne Rembold, Developer with Rembold Properties, LLC., Portland, OR - introduced himself, gave a brief overview of the project, and answered the Commissions' questions. Public Speaker: Mr. Howard Culver, PGA West resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, said the applicant has resolved all issues the PGA West Association and residents had addressed, and was in favor of the project. Public Speaker: Mr. Steve Weiss, PGA West resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, said the applicant has been extremely cooperative and responsive in addressing the residents' comments and concerned, and everyone was very pleased and excited to see this project being built. Public Speaker: Mr. Robert Thorn, CEO Partner of California West Communities, Carlsbad, CA - introduced himself as the project developer, thanked staff for their efforts in cooperation during the application review process, and answered the Commissions' questions. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:37 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wilkinson/Blum to adopt Resolution 2013-025 recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 36537 as submitted with staff's recommendations. Motion passed unanimously. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to adopt Resolution 2013-026 recommending approval of Site Development Permit 2013-924 as submitted with staff's recommendations. Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Wilkinson recused himself from the next item on the agenda because of his involvement with the project. 3. Environmental Assessment 2013-629, General Plan Amendment 2013-126, and Zone Change 2013-144 have submitted by William J. Hammer / Kim M. Hammer Trustees: Hammer Family Trust, proposing a general plan amendment from Low Density residential (up to 4 units/acre) to General Commercial and PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 zone change on 4.35 acres, from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. Location: southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. Principal Planner Wally Nesbit presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 8:00 p.m. Public Speaker: Mr. Hayward Pardue, Representative of the Applicant, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and answered the Commissions' questions. Public Speaker: Mr. Roger Greenwald, Resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and said he was not in favor of the project as he was concerned about possible light pollution and increased noise levels. He said the area is currently very quiet and suggested the proposed commercial center be built in other areas further to the west. He noted there were a lot of residents that were opposed to the proposed project and quoted Mr. Spock from Star Trek that "the needs of the many should outweigh the needs of the few." Public Speaker: Mr. Brett Pecano, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and said even though, Commissioner Wilkinson recused himself, he found it unethical that Mr. Wilkinson was involved with the proposed project and at the same time served on the City's Planning Commission. He stated he never would have purchased a home within the area had he known that a gas station could be built in proximity to his residence in the future. He said the area has always been zoned residential and he was never made aware that it could be rezoned to commercial. Public Speaker: Mrs. Pixie Scott, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced herself, said her residence would be greatly impacted by the light pollution, noise levels, and increased traffic from the proposed future commercial center. She expressed a concern about possible increase in crime as well as the oil and gas from a gas station being mixed in with the dust and dirt, and that air would be carcinogenic. She noted the reasons she chose to purchase her home in Piazza Serena were mainly because of La Quinta's dark sky ordinance, the lack of street lights and the quietness of the area. Public Speaker: Mr. Curt Starweather, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, said the proposed commercial center would have an adverse impact on the safety and serenity of the community and its property values due to the increase in traffic, noise levels, light pollution, and possible crime. He stated that the negative economic impact for the immediate community would be substantially greater than any possible benefit this project could offer. He PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 suggested the proposed project be located at either one of the two commercial sites, already zoned as such, located at the intersection of Avenue 58 and Madison Street. He requested that the Planning Commission deny the proposed project. Public Speaker: Mr. Justin Bert, Senior Vice President with Capstone Advisors, and representative of the owner of the 60 remaining undeveloped lots at Piazza Serena, Carlsbad, CA - introduced himself and said the proposed zoning and general plan designation were not compatible with the surrounding properties, as the area in question was surrounded by low density residential areas on all three sides. Mr. Bert noted that there has been no change in circumstance to warrant a zone change and a general plan amendment. He said during the recent General Plan Update there were no reasons identified to change the existing low density residential zoning for that property and there were plenty of already commercially zoned areas, approximately 70 acres, to the west that would be more appropriate for the proposed project. Chairperson Barrows noted for the record that a comment letter from Mr. Justin Bert, received on November 12, 2013, was distributed to the Commission. Public Speaker: Mr. Charles W. Clendening, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself as the President of the Board of Directors for the Piazza Serena community and said the entire community was in opposition of the proposed project. He said any commercial project in such proximity to a residential development would have an adverse economic impact on property values in an already troubled property market environment that is barely beginning to recover. He noted there already was a convenient store located on Monroe Street. He stated a possible commercial center would destroy the quietness and serenity of the residential community and would increase crime. Mr. Clandening said there was no need for a commercial project in the area and there was inadequate population to support it. He said that residents bordering Avenue 58 were not notified of the proposed zone change and requested that the Planning Commission deny the proposed project. Chairperson Barrows noted for the record that a comment letter from Mr. Clendening, received on November 12, 2013, was distributed to the Commission. Public Speaker: Mr. David V. Crouse, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and said he retired to the Coachella Valley because he truly thought the City of La Quinta was the Gem of the Desert and he liked the quietness and serenity of the community. He expressed concerns regarding the potential increase in traffic and noise, and that the placement of a gas station PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 adjacent to an existing underground power line could be potentially hazardous. He stated that a commercial center at the proposed site was not warranted. Chairperson Barrows noted for the record that a comment letter from Mr. Crouse, received on November 12, 2013, was distributed to the Commission. Public Speaker: Mr. Joe Hammer, property owner and applicant, Indian Wells, CA - introduced himself, briefly described the history of the proposed site and the adjacent vacant land and their existing zoning designations. He said he was unaware the proposed project would be objected to. He noted he spent a lot of time speaking with homeowner from the Andalusia residential community and those residents expressed support for the project. Mr. Hammer explained the proposed commercial center would be very well architecturally designed and he would not build anything that would jeopardize the value of the 17.5 acres of vacant land to the south and additional 40 acres of vacant land to the east that his family has owned for many years. He stated the northeast and southeast corners on Avenue 58 and Madison Street, currently under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside, would be developed as commercial centers in the future. He said the proposed commercial project would be beneficial to the surrounding community and encouraged the Commission to approve the zone change so he would have an opportunity to move forward with the project. Mr. Pardue noted there was a lot of interest from developers for a commercial project in the area. He said the zone change was only the first step of this process and the surrounding residents would have many more opportunities to give their input on the project should it go forward. Chairperson Barrows asked what community outreach was done for this project. Mr. Pardue said the major adjacent communities were contacted and made aware of the proposed project, including Trilogy and Andalusia. Public Speaker: Mrs. Silva Segrist, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced herself, said a future commercial development would not be beneficial to the existing residential community, but instead it would have an adverse impact on property values. She requested the Planning Commission deny the proposed zone change. Public Speaker: Mrs. Kim Hammer, property owner, Indian Wells, CA - introduced herself and said that for many years she resided behind a large commercial center and found it to be an asset and a convenience. She stated the proposed corner was a perfect location for a well thought out and aesthetically pleasing small commercial center and would very much benefit the community. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Public Speaker: Mrs. Pixie Scott, Piazza Serena resident, La Quinta, CA - reiterated her earlier statement that the surrounding residents were not in support of a commercial center in such close proximity to the existing residential community, and would like to keep the area dark, quiet, and serene as it currently exists. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:51 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to adopt Resolution 2013-027 recommending approval of Environmental Assessment 2013-629 as submitted with staff's recommendations. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Weber, Vice Chair Wright, and Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Wilkinson. ABSTAIN: None. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to deny General Plan Amendment 2013-126 and Zone Change 2013-144 as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Vice Chair Wright, and Chairperson Barrows. NOES: Commission Weber. ABSENT: Commissioner Wilkinson. ABSTAIN: None. BUSINESS SESSION - None CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None COMMISSIONER ITEMS 1 . Staff noted the City Council meeting of November 5, 2013 was cancelled. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to adjourn this meeting at 9:16 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, Secretary City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7 NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2013 CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS INC. PROPERTY OWNER: TOLL BROTHERS INC. REQUEST: CONSIDERATION LANDSCAPING PLANS RANCH► PH 1 OF ARCHITECTURAL AND FOR TRACT 30834 (STONE CREEK LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 58, ± 1 /2 MILE WEST OF MADISON STREET RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2013- approving Site Development Permit 2013-930, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval attached thereto. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The construction of 70 homes is proposed in a previously -approved tract, where five homes currently exist (Attachment 1). The proposed architectural and landscaping plans conform to the development standards of the La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code. Staff has worked with the applicant and existing homeowners within the tract to incorporate specific revisions that are agreeable to all parties. BACKGROUND Stone Creek Ranch (TR 30834) was approved in 2003. Architecture and landscaping plans were subsequently approved that same year, and again in 2005 for Toll Brothers after they purchased the tract from the original developer. The 29-acre tract consists of 76 single-family residential lots, five of which have existing homes built by the original developer (Attachment 2 and Attachment 3). One vacant residential lot is owned by an individual and is not a part of this request. Existing PGA West residential areas are located to the north and west of the project. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1_STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (1 ) SCR PC REPORT -final draft.docx Page 1 of 4 PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS Architecture: Five floor plans are proposed, each having three different front elevation treatments referred to as Tuscan, Santa Barbara and Contemporary/Desert Contemporary architectural styles. The Contemporary and Desert Contemporary elevations differ only in that Desert Contemporary incorporates stone facade treatments. The floor plans range from approximately 2,779 square feet to 3,976 square feet. Architectural features vary based on style, but typically include shutters, decorative iron accents, and stone wall facades. Exterior materials consist of stucco walls, stone veneer accents, and various shades of concrete S-tile roofing. Exterior colors vary from light to medium earth tones, with darker trim colors. The proposed units provide less detail and architectural depth than the originally approved Stone Creek units as the five existing homes incorporate high quality design elements, such as mudded two-piece clay tile, exterior plaster finish, exposed rough - sawn roof beams, four-color split face cultured stone veneer, and decorative items such as carriage lantern fixtures, ornamental wrought iron, wooden window shutters and French doors. Based on staff and existing resident concerns with the level of architectural detail between certain models of the proposed units and the existing homes and improvements at Stone Creek Ranch, staff requested that Toll Brothers work with the residents to address the compatibility concerns, specifically related to two-story units and concerns with the Contemporary/Desert Contemporary architectural elevations. Staff requested Toll Brothers provide, in writing, evidence that the homeowners are in concurrence with their proposed plans. As a result, staff has received a letter from Toll Brothers which incorporates correspondence, signed by the homeowners, that sets forth their preferences regarding specific siting and building design parameters related to unit types that may be built (Attachment 4). These include items such as where additional two-story units and certain architectural styles may be sited, upgrades, and accents/finishes. To the extent they are appropriate and enforceable, these items have been incorporated with the recommended conditions of approval and agreed upon by the applicant. The Tuscan and Santa Barbara styles, and color/material schemes will blend with the existing units at Stone Creek as they are consistent in massing, size and basic appearance. The applicant made revisions to the Contemporary/Desert Contemporary style based on resident comments, which are acceptable to the residents and staff, and have been incorporated into the plan review set. The architectural styles and layout of the proposed units are well designed, compatible with the existing surrounding residential communities, and are generally consistent with the development standards in the La Quinta Municipal Code. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1_STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (1 ) SCR PC REPORT -final draft.docx Page 2 of 4 Unit Siting: Building height limitations of the Zoning Code restrict the location of the proposed second story units within the tract. Because there are five existing one-story units at Stone Creek Ranch, new two-story units will be restricted on lots that border these units. Conditions on Toll Brothers prior SDP approval have been incorporated into their preliminary siting plan (Attachment 5; Site Plan Sheet 1). All siting related conditions from the prior approval are being retained, along with additional siting conditions as a result of Toll Brothers' agreement with the existing homeowners. Landscaping: The project infrastructure, common area landscaping and other permanent improvements have all been completed and accepted by the City; the applicant only proposes landscaping plans for the individual unit front yards (Attachment 5; Sheets L-CS through LD-1). These plans incorporate a mix of Tipuana and California Pepper trees (24" box), and Fan Palms as their major elements. Shrubs and groundcover consist of a mix of several commonly used materials such as Lantanas, Red Yucca and Texas Ranger. Desert Gold decomposed granite is the primary inert cover. Two of the five plans allow for small sod areas as an accent. The proposed landscape plans are acceptable, with exception of the use of California Peppers. The ALRB and Planning Commission have previously expressed concern with this tree, as it is prone to wind damage and increased maintenance. Consequently, a condition has been recommended to replace the Pepper tree with an alternative tree type. Staff also recommends tree sizes be increased to 36' box, with a minimum caliper of 2.5", which is consistent with current requirements. Otherwise, the assorted species of plants are functional and low water users, as many are southwest desert species. The landscape palettes complement the architecture and layout of the residential units. COMMISSIONS/BOARD/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: On November 6, 2013, the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board reviewed these plans and recommended approval of the site development permit as proposed and subject to the staff recommended conditions of approval (Attachment 4). The Committee discussed color scheme, enhanced walkway location, and suggested addition of windows in garages and pedestrian doors in stand-alone third car garages. However none of these items were incorporated into the recommended approval. AGENCY & PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on September 17, 2013. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Community Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1_STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (1 ) SCR PC REPORT -final draft.docx Page 3 of 4 Public Notice: Notice of the hearing was posted at three public places along with the project site, and notice was also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Community Development Department has determined that this request has been previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2002-457, prepared for Tentative Tract Map 30834 and which was certified in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by the La Quinta City Council on November 5, 2002. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. Report prepared by: Wally Nesbit, Principal Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson, Community Development Director Attachments: 1 . Project Information 2. Vicinity Map 3. Project Area Map 4. Homeowner agreement letter with signature pages 5. Stone Creek Ranch Site Development Permit Plan Set P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1_STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (1 ) SCR PC REPORT -final draft.docx Page 4 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930, INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR TRACT 30834 CASE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 261" day of November, 2013, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Toll Brothers, Inc. for approval of architectural and landscaping plans for Tract 30834, generally located on the north side of Avenue 58, '/2 mile west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: LOTS 1 THROUGH 38, 40, 42 THROUGH 62, 64, AND 68 THROUGH 76 OF TR 30834 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, after holding the required duly -noticed public hearing on the 51" day of November, 2002, did adopt Resolution 2002-148, certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving Tentative Tract Map 30834; and, WHEREAS, per requirements of the La Quinta Municipal Code, notice of the hearing was posted at three public places (Stater Brothers Market, La Quinta Post Office, and La Quinta City Hall) along with the project site, said notice also having been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: Consistency with the General Plan The proposed Site Development Permit is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as it proposes single-family residential homes within an existing partially -developed residential tract, which is General Plan -designated for Low Density Residential development. Planning Commission Resolution 2013- Site Development Permit 2013-930 Toll Brthers, Inc. Adopted: November 26, 2013 Page 2 2. Consistency with the Zoning Code The proposed units, as conditioned, are consistent with the development standards of the Low Density Residential (RL) district in terms of architectural style, building height and mass, landscaping, setbacks and other development standards. The developer proposes single-family detached residential unit consistent with the existing site approvals. The site development permit as approved will ensure compliance with the zoning standards of the Low Density Residential zoning district, and other supplemental residential standards as established in Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 3. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Community Development Department has determined that this request is an action to implement the development plan and overall project approval for Tentative Tract 30834, which was previously assessed in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 2002-457, prepared for Tentative Tract Map 30834 and which was certified in accordance with CEQA by the La Quinta City Council on November 5, 2002. No changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. 4. Architectural Design The architecture and layout of the units are compatible with, and not detrimental to, the existing surrounding residential land uses, and is consistent with the development standards in the Municipal Code. The units were reviewed by the City's Architecture and Landscaping Review Board (ALRB) and found to be appropriate, in context with the five existing units within the tract, in terms of their architectural style and character, supplemental design elements (stone veneer accents, S-tile roofing, etc.) and compatible unit siting of one and two-story. 5. Landscape Design The proposed project is consistent with and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed individual lot landscaping plans will unify and enhance visual continuity of the existing overall project landscaping for the community. The assorted species of plants are functional and low water users, as many are southwest desert species. The individual unit landscape palettes, as Planning Commission Resolution 2013- Site Development Permit 2013-930 Toll Brthers, Inc. Adopted: November 26, 2013 Page 3 conditioned, complement the architecture and siting of the units, as well as existing landscaped areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case; SECTION 2. That it does hereby approve Site Development Permit 2013-930, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Exhibit A (Conditions of Approval). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 261" day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: KATIE BARROWS, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: LES JOHNSON, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 1 of 13 C;FNFRAI 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2013-930 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approval: • Environmental Assessment 2002-457 • Tentative Tract Map 30834 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire on November 26, 2015 and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Permit) • La Quinta Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Sheet (Public Management Improvement P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 2 of 13 • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-201 3-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010- 0014-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 3 of 13 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Master HOA Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Approval of this Site Development Permit shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 4 of 13 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 12. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 13. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 14. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. PM 10 Plan (Update) 1 " = 40' Horizontal B. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) C. On -Site Precise Grading Plan (submitted to Building Division) 1 " = 20' Horizontal D. Rough Grading/Storm Drain Plan (Update) 1 " = 40' Horizontal E. Off -Site Street improvement/Signing & Striping Plan (Update) P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 5 of 13 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. F. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping Plan (Update) 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. On -Site Precise Grading Plans are required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official, Community Development Director and the City Engineer. On -Site Precise Grading Plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, pad elevations, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. 15. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 16. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 6 of 13 the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. GRADING 17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 18. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 19. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 20. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 7 of 13 either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 21. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1 . All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 22. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 23. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 24. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 25. Stormwater handling shall conform to the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 30834. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 26. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 8 of 13 27. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 28. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 29. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 30. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 31. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 32. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 33. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 34. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 35. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 36. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 9 of 13 Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. 137-2013-001 1 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009- 0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-001 1. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-201 3-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 11T11 ITIFS 37. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 38. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 39. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 40. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 10 of 13 The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. CONSTRUCTION 41. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 42. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 43. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 44. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 45. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Community Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Community Development Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Community Development Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Community Development Director and/or City Engineer. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Community Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the final landscaping plans as approved by the City. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Community Development Director shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 11 of 13 plan. 46. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets", latest edition", in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 47. Front yard landscaping for each dwelling shall consist of, at minimum, 36" box trees (i.e., a minimum 2.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after planting), 5-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. Double lodge poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to brace and stake trees. To encourage water conservation, no more than 50% of the front yard landscaping shall be devoted to turf. A no -turf front yard option shall be provided for each plan type. California Pepper trees shall be replaced with a sturdy, lower maintenance species. MAINTENANCE 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 49. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 50. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 52. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Art in Public Places program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 53. Applicant shall pay the fees as required by the Coachella Valley Unified School District, as in effect at the time requests for building permits are submitted. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doe PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 12 of 13 54. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the Coachella Valley Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee, in accordance with LQMC Chapter 3.34. 55. A fee of $50.00, payable to Riverside County, is due to this office within 24 hours of any City Council approval. This is required by the County to post the Notice of Exemption and offset costs associated with AB 3158 (Fish and Game Code 71 1 .4). A fee of $72.00, payable to City of La Quinta, is due to this office within 24 hours of any City Council approval. This is required by the City to prepare the Notice of Exemption. FIRE DEPARTMENT 56. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 1000 GPM for a 2- hour duration at 20 PSI. 57. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Two sets of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 58. Applicant/Developer shall mount blue dot retro-reflectors pavement markers on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicated location of the fire hydrant. It should be 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 59. Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two family dwellings per the California Residential Code. Contact the Riverside County Fire Department for the Residential Fire Sprinkler Standard. 60. Fire Apparatus access road and driveways shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire Department Standard number 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org). Access lanes will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TOLL BROTHERS, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 13 of 13 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 61. Two story units shall not be permitted on Lots 4 -18, 36-38, 40, 61, 62, 64 and 68. 62. The Tuscan elevation style shall be exclusively used on Lots 36-38, 64 and 68. Homes on these lots shall include additional exterior stone beyond that provided on the approved Tuscan elevations, paver driveways and walkways, concrete S-tile with 20% boost at field eaves, and wood garage doors. 63. Lots 33-35, 40, 69 and 70 are limited to either Tuscan or Santa Barbara elevation styles. 64. No two story plan as approved may be constructed using the Contemporary (no stone) elevation style. All other styles, including Desert Contemporary (stone accents) are acceptable as two-story units. 65. The first model shall be built as a single story unit. 66. All exterior window and slider door frame colors shall be bronze. 67. It shall be disclosed to any and all parties involved in the sale or other transfer of Lots 4 - 9, that said lots are adjacent to an on -going golf course maintenance operation for the PGA West community. P:\Reports - PC\2013\PC 11-26-13\PH 1 STONE CREEK SDP 2013-930\PH 1 (3) SCR PC COAS - final draft.doc ATTACHMENT 1 Proiect Information CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2013-930 TENTATIVE TRACT 36537 APPLICANT: TOLL BROTHERS INC. (ALLEN JANISCH) PROPERTY OWNER: TOLL BROTHERS INC. (ALLEN JANISCH) ARCHITECT: RFT DESIGN (ROBERT TYLER) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: TKD ASSOCIATES INC. (TOM DOCZI) ENGINEER: MSA CONSULTING, INC. (JULIAN DE LA TORRE, P.E.) REQUEST: REVIEW OF ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR STONE CREEK RANCH, TR 30834 LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE 58, '/2 MILE WEST OF MADISON STREET GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: GOLF COURSE AND RESIDENTIAL (PGA WEST) SOUTH: RESIDENTIAL (TR 31249, VACANT) EAST: RESIDENTIAL WEST: GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE AND RESIDENTIAL (PGA WEST) SUBDIVISION/PREVIOUS APPROVAL INFORMATION: THE STONE CREEK RANCH TRACT 30834 WAS APPROVED IN 2003. ORIGINAL ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS WERE GRANTED IN AUGUST 2003, WITH FIVE HOMES SUBEQUENTLY COMPLETED. TOLL BROTHERS PURCHASED 70 OF THE REMAINING LOTS IN 2005 AND WERE GRANTED NEW ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS, WHICH SUBSEQUENTLY EXPIRED WITH NO UNITS HAVING BEEN BUILT The proposed unit characteristics are presented below. there are five floor plans, ranging from 2,779 s.f. (one-story Pasillo) to 3,976 s.f. (two-story Mollino), depending on option choices. all plans utilize three architectural elevations; Tuscan, Santa Barbara and Contemporary/Desert Contemporary. The Contemporary and Desert Contemporary elevations differ only in that Desert Contemporary incorporates stone facade treatments. Several color schemes are provided for each product (Attachment 4). Pasillo product (Attachment 5, Sheets ER4 - F1): • One floor plan - 2BR/2BA/Den, 2,779 s.f. (casita optional) • One story; 19' 6" (Contemporary) • Two car garage in all units Entrada product (Attachment 5, Sheets ER4 — F3): • One floor plan with two-story option — 3BR/2BA/den, 2,983 s.f. (2nd floor living room and BR optional; 3,598 s.f.) • One story at 20'; two story at 26' 4" (both Contemporary) • Three car tandem garage in all units Montana product (Attachment 5, Sheets ER9 — F5): • One floor plan with two-story option — 3BR/2BA/den, 2,980 s.f. (2n1 floor living/bed/game room and BR optional; 3,728 s.f.) • One story at 20' 3'; two story at 27' 10" (both Contemporary) • Three garage spaces in all units (separate 3rd car garage) Mollino product (Attachment 5, Sheets ER16 — F7): • One floor plan with two-story option - 3BR/3BA/den, 3,339 s.f. (2nd floor living/BR/BA optional; 3,976 s.f.) • One story at 22' 6'; two story at 27' 1 " (both Santa Barbara) • Two car garage with optional 3rd car garage or casita Canterra product (Attachment 5, Sheets ER22 — F8): • One floor plan - 3BR/4BA, 3,006 s.f. • One story at 18' 7" (Santa Barbara & Tuscan) • Two car garage with optional 3rd car garage or casita a f ' 1. r 4v- "' � M � r 4 � _ � Tr ♦` • r S 4th-Av- N r s ar o E■'�� . 1L r a PG WEST ' Al • STONE C R E RANCH '60t�i"Av�� +r �rl �ll}t+7 SDP 2013-930 Stone Creek Ranch Toll Brothers Inc. ATTACHMENT Project Area Map Ni ATTACHMENT 4 `Toll 93rotheies America's Luxury Home Builder" Stone CreekRanch To: Wallace H. Nesbit, Principal Phumer October 23, 2013 Commuiiity Development Department City of I.a Qunta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quanta CA 92253 Direct:760-777-7069 Fax:760-777-7011 email: rvnesbi0la-auinta.c, Re: Stone Creek Ranch existing Homeowner approval letter for the Toll Brothers Inc. new home designs & exterior elevations at Stone Creek Ranch To: Planning Dept. & Architectural Review Committee City of La Quinta This letter is in regards to the Stone Creek Ranch existing Homeowner approval letter Revised & Dated September 30, 2013, Toll Brothers (TBI) has read the revised letter and we are in agreement with the conditions outlined in the letter. Toll is amending SDP 2013-930 application to incorporate the concerns of the existing residents, as detailed in the attached revised September 30 letter. The Stone Creek Ranch existing homeowners found no other issues except for what has been outlined and written into the Sept 30, 3013 revised letter. The four existing homeowners have signed the attached revised letter and TBI is also in agreement. Thank You&Inc. tToll Senior Project Manager Stone Creek Ranch 760-770-0707 office # ajanisch(a tollbrothersinc.com 48 Via Noela Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Phone:760-770-0707 Fax:760-770-0766 Wally Nesbit From: Paul Neustaedter <paul.neustaedter@steinbachdodge.com> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 1:32 PM To: Allen Janisch; Wally Nesbit Cc: Chris Stamnes; jaybenzinger@gmail.com; Paul Neustaedter; robert@careermatching.com Subject: Stone Creek Ranch Home Owners Letter Sept 30 2013 Attachments: Benzinger Toll Bros Sept 30 2013 letter final jpg; EnrightToll Bros Sept 30 2013 letter final.pdf; Stamnes Toll Bros Sept 30 2013 letter final jpg; Savannah and Neustaedter Toll Bros Sept 30 2013 letter final.pdf, Stone Creek Ranch HO letter to Toll Bros Sept 30 2013 SIGNED.pdf Hello Wally and Allen, As the home owners of Stone Creek Ranch in La Quinta we submit the attached letter to the City of La Quinta and Toll Brothers. We have agreed as home owners to the attached. On behalf of the home owners in Stone Creek Ranch, Paul Paul Neustaedter President & General Manager Steinbach Dodge Chrysler Ltd. FIXT of Steinbach National Car Rental 174 'a At* Sam 204-326-4461 800-490-5337 204-326-9933 Fax www.steinbachdodde.ca Page 1 of 3 REVISED September 30, 2013 To: Allen Janisch Toll Brother's Inc. Senior Project Manager Stone Creek Ranch Phone: 760-770-0707 email: ajanisch@tollbrothersinc.com To: Wallace H. Nesbit, Principal Planner Community Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta CA 92253 Direct:760-777-7069 Fax:760-777-7011 email: wnesbit@la-auinta.ore Re: Stone Creek Ranch existing Homeowner approval letter for the Toll Brothers Inc. new home designs & exterior elevations at Stone creek Ranch To: Planning Dept. & Architectural Review Committee City of La Quinta To: Toll Brothers Regarding, `This letter is in regards to the Stone Creek Ranch community in which Toll Brothers Inc. (TBI) had purchased 70 of the remaining 76 lots in July 2005. TBI has communicated their desire to start the process to build 5 new home designs with 4 exterior elevations each. This letter also is in regards to the meeting that was held at the city of La Quinta Planning Dept. on Sept 13, 2013 with Les Johnson, Community Development Director, Wally Nesbit, Principal Planner, Allen Janisch, Senior Project Manager for TBI & Robert Tyler, RFT Architecture. Allen also met with the existing homeowners on Aug. 1, 2013 & Aug. 6, 2013 to present the floor plans & exterior elevations. The proposed elevation styles are Tuscan, Santa Barbara, Contemporary & Desert Contemporary. There are 8 exterior color schemes that blend well with the existing homes. Additionally, the proposed front yard landscaping plans have been reviewed resulting in reduction of turf areas per current CVWD specs, providing for more responsible and sustainable landscaping packages." The Stone Creek Ranch Homeowners recently reviewed the floor plans & exterior elevations. During this review process the following changes need to be made by TBI to satisfy our requests: 1) The exterior window & slider door frame colors will be bronze throughout the community. 2) TBI will only build Tuscan elevations, single story only (no second floor option, no contemporary, desert contemporary or Santa Barbara), on lots 36, 37, 38, 64 & 68. 3) TBI will offer the following exterior upgrades for sale to all new buyers: Wood garage doors, paver driveways & walkways, hand troweled stucco finish or smooth stucco finish, Concrete S- tile with 20% boost @ field & eaves & additional stone on the Tuscan & Desert Contemporary homes. Stone Creek Ranch — Home Owners Page 2 of 3 REVISED September 30, 2013 4) The Tuscan elevation homes built on lots 36, 37, 38, 64 or 68 will have the following upgrades included as part of the sales price: Additional exterior stone, paver driveway & walkway, Concrete S-tile with 20% boost @ field eaves, & wood garage doors. (See upgraded Stone Creek Montana plan sheet ER11). 5) Toll has presented a revised elevation of the Entrada plan, the revised contemporary elevation is acceptable and if the Entrada 2nd floor option is sold, the elevation must be either Tuscan, Santa Barbara or Desert Contemporary elevation. No contemporary 2"d floor homes will be sold. 5) All second floor options will have these elevations Tuscan, Santa Barbara or Desert Contemporary (desert contemporary has stone). No 2"d floor contemporary elevations will be sold. (Contemporary has no stone). 7) TBl to build the first model as a single story model. if Toll decides that they build an optional 2nd floor model that 2"d floor model is to be built after the single story model is completed or at the some time, but not prior to. S) Old Ranch Trail South to be Santa Barbara and or Tuscan -style elevations on these additional lots 33, 34, 35, 69, 70, 9) Lot 40 will be sold with either a single story Santa Barbara or single story Tuscan elevation. 10) No peach color garage doors. if they are not wood, the garage doors will be a medium to dark brown color so that homes are highlighted rather than garage doors. The Stone Creek Ranch existing homeowners find no other issues and we believe the proposed homes will complement the existing homes in the community. We also believe that the proposed homes design & variety of floor plans & exterior elevation choices enhance Stone Creek Ranch's natural beauty and the surrounding beautiful mountain scenery. Thank you, The Homeowners of Stone Creek Ranch Stone Creek Ranch — Home Owners Page 3 of 3 REVISED September 30, 2013: Stone Creek Ranch horneowner,approval to this letter and its contents. Store Creek Address '230- 3 4 a c�Q r.e'r. �i rr ; 1 �aX - 30 narpli'/ Name Signature Stone Creek Address Date Name Si nature Stone Creek:AddrM Date Stone Creek Ranch.— Home Owners Paul Neustaedter From: chris stamnes <lgchris@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:40 PM To: Paul Neustaedter Subject: Fw: ----Forwarded Message ----- From: Joe Weibler Sent: Sep 30, 2013 10:41 AM To:'chris stamnes' Subject: n.us..axa :AlapA'.9su,..;sKr..L ......... ..wrs 001 Chris Stamnes (760) 485-1613 HK Lane Real Estate, La Quinta Office www.christinestanmes.com SEP-30-2013 10:42 FROM: 17604350633 TO:12043269933 P.2/2 Stone Creek Ranch homeowner approval Na Page 3 of 3 REVISED September 30, 2013 to this letter and its contents. Stone N Stone Cree c Mature Sto ne Creek Addres Date _ Narn fiw v A- -signr one CreeTome 1 (.Ree R- E- AS+ D to Stine l Creek Ranch — Home Owners Page 3 of 3 REVISED September 30, 2013 Stone Creek Ranch homeowner approval to this letter and its contents. Name Signature Stone Creek Address Date Name Stone Creek Address Date Name Si nature Stone Creek Address Stone Creek Ranch — Home Owners bts mix, a .ej. r - .r •�y4 't'.r•. alb++►� • �'+. T. STONE CREEK RANCH Site Development Booklet City of La Quinta August 19, 2013 ATTACHMENT 5 �►'��_ �=ate^., �t" , CToll `Brothers Ameika's Luxury Nome Builder" �' t• iID i KC INDEX SHEET Site Plan Site Plan for Site Development Permit ................... 1 Stone Creek Existing Homes .................................. 2 Architecture Pasillo ■ Elevations..................................................... 3 5 ■ Roof Plan ...................................................... 6 ■ Floor Plan ...................................................... 7 Entrada ■ Elevations..................................................... 8-13 ■ Roof Plan ...................................................... 14-15 ■ Floor Plan ...................................................... 16-)' j Montana ■ Elevations ............ ........ 18 ,'q ■ Roof Plan ...................................................... 25ra(o ■ Floor Plan ...................................................... 27-A ................................... Mollino ■ Elevations..................................................... 29-3L) ■ Roof Plan ........................................... --....... 35- 3(o ■ Floor Plan ...................................................... 37-3g Canterra ■ Elevations......................................................39-HI ■ Roof Plan.......................................................42 ■ Floor Plan......................................................43 Color Scheme 1-8.................................................... 44 -52- Exterior Lighting Fixtures..........................................53 Landscape Front Yard Landscape / Hardscape plans ................. 5q-logy STONE CREEK R A N C H TI wcs.1.W L...... .... .............. .............. NO dffOMAf UNITS SHALL&E IFA1MM ON LOTS II•ISI................... ]-------- , 1 I !I 1 1 'll I I 'irl 12 6aRGA III 14 I Nouwo I FtiRA[AA I I T7 I comet+. aiG14 • I III C+S,PyRA I I �g ♦\ .- l\ . I L. 1 � � F ,+ `/ to t. nnxlo - - _ _ 19 / al SY !l IT / •./ice I' Ej 49 46 11 r { 1 ' OHE�REPR �OURT - 1 II I fA N. - I I EX Rmi L Iv MIN. FROM YJ•RD MI-0 ILT116E&01q MAOI (ME Ml- NOTE i p_ FRONT Y"D MI" OErAIL NOTE 21 TYPICAL LOT DETAIL SCALE: I'm 2D' DETAIL NOTES: 1 • EXCEPT WHERE NOTED, ALL BUILDINGS ARE SITED TO CONFORM WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACKS SHOWN 2 ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS MAY ENCROACH UP TO TWO FEET INTO ALL YARD SETBACKS. 3- PATIOS UNDER 17 HIGH MAY ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK. .1 — PALO�DEPUCIE "1A _ II_ o III 41 -r ulA ),� vouu,c � 22 24 1 A\\ E'• _ rl I ' \ ��.` �L r'b .. � anrArrA I I. nrRlula ti•w I r. i .a, ri\ ' 1t' 60 - 44 tl .I f - 1 1 I 1 -t l2wpw 1 I61- -- -- Ii'Y 'y1 '• I rl TTl ' Y -! 43 _ I I... A•atlE•+A I _- Ex. M+lU6s Irf(+ III 74 4 W—Q.4.. f 7542 t_ + �! / Ai7iih A%.TNMlA r ,•I 7 L ..., - - T L - �)• 1 II I L L : I 7� �\\. + •L I 1 [ NCITAW4t WRtttLAAr.9T STORY - / )/ 1�J - �I II HID%nl1f7LVLHIU`[ORSAWA L + E - - , 1.' BARiWi,#ITVA1KkJ V G• LOT 72' vW Nr Y.. A AHCE �.. •�. II l ~ III U. VACUITY LOT ��- / / ! N01E. LOt 4R k4,46!lnu0EM, 41pq'T /! [!.q+.�� C..•. Al10 W a HAVE IbIc t?R lw ft ' u - L� _ a•�I __ I rux 'oxm: 3y , 1 _ ' e, -`�!T _'CI�,E,�R TRI�ti. PJEST ,�. "' - _,.. f•' - �_ — �� - F, u:xLraJ O r -- 'E Ue f, M1 - �• {` I rLa r- i 3 S r"Y.i AIA 37 ad a6 + u 32 j C",IF4- rlV:ll.'P[A 1 I ", vSd,s1aA I C44Laxx Rr:^RuWA { 7 CUi k1�R4A er tiulrt eA;3R0 - .I T I --. N AND DB WAI YE1PAAF „,' U1—ETU,CAN44SANTABARBARAELEYAIIONSONLY vo— .._AVENUE58 4 LEGEND EXISTING BOUNDA EXISTING P.U.E SE AND EASEMENTS - EXISTING LOT LINE ----- �� --- -- EXISTING RIGHT 01 • EXISTING IRRIGA01 EXJSIING SEWER • EXISTINGWATER 'I�oisvxx 0' 60' 120' SCALE V-60' IN THE CRY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SITE PLAN FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DATA TABLE ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 762 430-DO) THRU 019; 022, 762.4W-024 THRU 044. 7r•;, Ma DDT THRU 016, AND 742.440.021 THRU 029 LP•GAL DESCRIPTION! TRACT MAr 00.30B34, BEING A PORTION OF IN$ SOUINEASI OF SIC31ON 21, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN 09RHARDIND BASE AND MERIDIAN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GL[6JERAL PLAN OBSIGNATION: I LOW DCHNTY RESIDENTIAL UP TO 4 DU/AC ES0S11NG AHDPR4705PD 20NING OESlGNATIOLE LOW 916"YY RESIDENTIAL RIUSTIHG LAND U'Je I EXISTING 441171!"At HOUSES AND VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOTS - SCHOOL LX4TkCTI I COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFISD SCHOOL PaTRICF PUBLIC LmLJREC ELECTRIC: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ED0.303.7764 GAS; THE GAS COMPANY E00:Y?i3 - WLIFOONE: VIRI COMPANY_ E00.41z-sm WARE• COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76134M-2i61 --- CAM.'TIME WARNER CABLE 740-340.1312 SEWER: COACHFLLA VALLEY WATER LHSMICT 760.31`13-2661 USA: UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT INIG-227.2400 --_._•_. __ NOTE: 1. HOUSE PLAN TYPES AND FRONT ELEVATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN RESPONSE TO BUYER PREFERENCE. 2. WHERE THE SAME HOUSE PLAN IS USED ON ADJACENT LOTS, FRONT BUILDING ELEVATIONS WILL BE VARIED TO AVOID A UNIFORM APPEARANCE 3. DUE TO RESTRICTED LOT CONFIGURATION, A MINOR VARIANCE TO SETBACKS IS REQUIRED ON LOTS S AND 72. L., �M'WAY III 4BTH AVENUE L141 C+ SOTH AVENUE N i 56TH AVENUE Inn R M � +, z C -7? OF Z u :t 5 's CF rsr. QtEpi- s, T,113 PJi3, b AIRPORT ULEVARC PROJECT LOCATION , 5 SBPH AVENUE BACKS. . J BOTH AVENUE WAY VICINITY MAP N N,T.S. PROJECT: TRACT NO.30834 / STONE CREEK RANCH PLAN: SITE PLAN EXHIBIT DATE: _. AUGUST 13.2013 APPLICANT: / DEVELOPER: 7OLL MOTHERS, INC CONTACT: ALLEN JANISCH ADDRESS: 8767 EAST VIA DE VENTURA - SUITE 390 SCOTTSDALE. ARIZONA 85269 TELEPHONE (7601770.0707 FAIL: ARCHITECT: RR DESIGN ARCIORCTUR! I CONTACT: RODERT F, TYLER ADDRESS. 13700 ALTON PARKWAY - SUITE IS7 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 9261E [94191500.8947 PAX: (949)461-0606 TELEPHONE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: T40A5SOC+ATES. INC. CONTACT: THOMAS K. DOCZI ADDRESS: 71.711 SAN JACINTO DRIVE - SUITE C RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE - (760)776.1761 1 FAX: ENGINEER: MSA CONSULTING, INC.I SHEET PLANNLNa In CTVE. ENaDa Lmma ■ LAND SURVEYING 1 34200 BOB HOTS DRIVE Ao ■ RANCHO MDae II CA 92270 of � Tmoee (760) 320-9011 B FAx (760) 323-7893 JULIAN A. DE LA TORRE PE C43880 SHOTS STONE CREEK EXISTING HOMES EXHIBIT a 1100, / IfT a II.►r ' ..�Ilf/•rt � /f 'rigfr ri,r+vrrro' r0 I/ sa{. fw M'iltlilfiallf ram--• �i� yl� I �, ,�.'�r�. rlii��'�l.Y i .7. -Al" r' . R E A T E 0 U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R 0 N M E N T Afl C/DC JE f- mfKT.CONTEMPORAkY I PASI LLO RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 10.0713 SCALE: fR2 CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 D I' 5' I T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 T O C R E A T A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S LEFT ern AHr�H My C 1"51 REAR 0),ch I T �. n�rrrrrtrrr rr�r-errs �ps��k�'° SAS I L LU RIFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 0724.13 SCALE: CAUFORNIA CALIFORNIA In 92618 92270 I' S' 10, T-949.500.8947 T-7607706.0707 ER3 5 75 T O C R E A T E N❑ S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S (V , PAS I LLO ROOF PLAN YyFq�.S] AN STINE CREEK NsClf�l pr u,]F13 r c 4 RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: RI CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA _ 92618 92270 0 5' 10' T-949.500.8947 T-760.77Q0707 wal C R E A T IS QUALITY PHYSICAL AN D. SOCIAL ENVI S ulriVu PASILLO 2779 S.F. OPT. CASITA I U I p i CV go I I ❑��a I ce I w ! -1 LU 0 1' - - I lt=10 I I fr a — � Ile L: c � ;E Al I I I I 0 Q LL 7 OPT. KITCHEN RIFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 0 1- 5' 10' T-949.500.8947 T-760770.0707 Fl E A T IC AI. ANp SOCIAL EN V I R O N Ni E N T5 I C1 ENTRADA 1IOW_CREEK]HISIONS Rf7[x£Slr-anl I'ti��u6iCsirlEk> rF�In-ciao IY)I6 Tmr Ilf;;nT1(_'!s' 137WAVON eKVVY 11 CASWS r'Ift. CALIfOkNbA CAIIK*NLA V2619 92270 Y S I C A! A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S C E NTRADA IF D 5*N TOlE 9R IMER5 r;cai :-r o l an I o `ME E1EVATIONS 18 WAIITONWWY I ¢wlsCIR. IRMNE RANCHO Mimi FAI26 B SC CAi1ECiRMA CktFORNIA 92618 92770 T.9d45wago T;76a77a=—/ ER5 T E 0 U A T SB C/DC ENTRADA RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO 13016 TITLE ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 10.07 13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 T-9d9 500 8947 T-760 770, 0707 /0 T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S �I"W�Rr^r,IrllrlL�7L�i1Y1��1��A�ll�ll lipiijil�%1�%1�ii�hr��IAr,1=�IRyA�ll�l�ri1�%i�AiA�A'Nrp�,jY�A�Mi�i1�A��%i�A�A;AjY%iA�t,�y�•nrA�"'�' Yjillj�ll�y �r='r�s\r'i�s\rir;4=ris\s��i�irifi:\Y\r\rwr r�r\r\i�rRririrArAr^r�r�r rRr�x�r�rir r�r�r�r�ar�r�r�rwti'�'4�r'■"rr:02:* -!\N1,iY\\r>r!\■\!7\7\rir\l�i:!\\1�\>rir\fl\!!i\\i�li\Yii\!\\\�i\M\iiiiri�i�l�li�i�i1\ZI�f/I�l�i!\!\`lillYi�i�i I F FT RIGHT REAR STINE CREED[ E N T RA DA RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 1 1 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07,24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 0 11 5'- l0' T-949.5008947 T-760.770.0707 ER7 11 0 C R EA T E 0 U A L I T' V T M DC REAR MNE COB E N T RA DA RFT DESIGN TOIL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE ELEVATIONS 13700 AITON PKWY 1 I CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE 10.07 13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CAIIFORNIA 92618 92270 0' T-949 500.B947 T•760,770L 0707 ERB /c9- TO CREATE QUALITY P II YS I C. AI AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS LEFT RIGHT ENTRADA N.C7W1 STONE CRER RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 0 11 5 D' T-949 500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 ER 13 1 L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I ENTRADA ROOF PLAN wU ARCj�?� UWC EEK RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07,24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 9261E 92270 05' 10' T-949.500,8947 T-760.770-.0707 R2 14 E A T E 0 U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N 0 S O C I A L ENTRADA ROOF PLAN @OPT. STONE CREED tU KRCyr Ns C 6if51 ar rr,U'� RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA- 92618 92270 r -- T-949.500.8947 T-760.770.0707 _.. 3 15 w T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T M E N T -, 0= O_ F— X 0 [k, LA o Uou N m 3 -M-1111 . A 100 w U ------ O in — 114 I X; r----------1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I LU O I L.L _ X r 1 o ----------- I I i Cie it _ t I x I I I OM J L—I J ..9 Ald ENTRADA 2983 S.F. :. -rma v: 0 O - -- U --Ll�. C�tiT7 Ill" OPT. BATHS !'tip 'La44r w eFw� STOKE CREW[°"` dj, W..uairu �� RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE; 1 ST FLOOR PLAN 13700ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: F2 CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 i? - 51. I'a. T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 16 Ap i 0 C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S ENTRADA 615 S.F. (2ND FLOOR OPT.) AR Na C1M51 uduaF�� ,s STONE CREE1��4c RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: 2ND FLOOR PLAN 13700 ALTON PKVVY 1 1 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA In 9261E 92270 8' 6' 10' T-949.500.8947 T-760.774.0707 F3 /-7 17 NIS rAKIA 111 T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S MONTANA RET DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07,24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 T-949.500.8947 T-760.770Q.0707 fR10 19 lq T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S ANU 71m�� o- N N L ME I ml�l m ip C/DC OPTIONAL STONE ® DESERT CONTEMPORARY ELEVATION ONLY STOME-CRHX- 1 MO N TANA RFT DESIGN 13700 ALTON PKVVY TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 1 1 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 10.07.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 1 92618 92270 0 1 510' T-949.500.8947 T-760770..0707 ER11 O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E FMI LEFT ca o RIGHT (i itewAwAwAwArewAwAwAwAaAwRwlawAwAwAwA iwAw^:AwAwArAaAwAWAwAwA. .A.AwAwAwA iw e,re,r,.rereaerµrArArI..! AwArAe�yrA+ - irawAwwwAwaYArawArArAwArArararArArAre■AierererererA�AwAreWs" wwAYAr-AAwAwAwAY :f n� rAr,4wA,wArAAArAr AAA sArew rw,RryN�4s' .w1�11rJ5�lira�AyA�'IMF'�Ir,are.rrr/iw/4rrirwrwA/ItiiM�rArxrxrAY/Y! >KA Ar Arerer,arer,arerAti:er rArArerAaRrArArArAr�ywAwArArArAwAr�e�C� �16AYArAwArArArAl�larwrRr,�14rA,rA#ArA,rAyrerialerMr,er,N,r,�gr/�ryMie �i aArAr,/yr/yrAlellAf ■/�rr*r/�;�A.0ohwAwlatiAwe. own. NrNrArAwArArerAi+.r�r.wsr-r- r-r-r-r-:►r�r-r�r-r �res►eirRw�ww�w�w� _ LIE 11 REAR� � iidF19 h S1'ONF_CREEI[ °��`�� MONTANARFTDESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO:13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 ,i 10' T-949.500.8947 T-760.770L.0707 ER12 21 gl T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I L E N V I R O N M E N T S iiMA�A�iAr1A�I�.44 — —� AMj4rA rA ■AaiAytAllly+� •j��ly=i�/y�A��A�iR�Ai�II" _ _ ra'l:ilaf ��'ri ri7ir�y�y�'!'a 1 1 001 0 T 00 MO NTANA n ARry� Il�,cs~Ia1 •� P�I{-0FIi ,� NONE CREEK RFT DESIGN TOIL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 072413 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 0 i ` 5' 0 T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 ER13 22 T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P III Y I A L. E N V I R O N M E N T S LEFT i RIGHT .w,;tz tirte7��r STGNE CREEK Mu C LNif Rm:1lJF11 �-' MONTANA RFTDESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07,24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 9201E 92270 T-949.500.8947 T-760,770-.0707 24 �� A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S DC REAR MO NTANA -- - $ice CREEK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 10.07.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CAUFORNIA 92618 92270 0 11 10 T-949.500.8947 T-760 770-.0707 ER15 90 4 I A L E N V I R O N M E N cti.fl ARC�jf a e l"51 MONTANA ROOF PLAN tFi5�Y RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKYVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24, 13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 119 T-94000,8947 T-760.770,0707 R4 25 T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S i_ __----------------------------- — --a—_ --_ _—__ _----- _— _--_ _-- — — — — — - I I I I I I I I N _ I L L:V I I I N I � I ! I ! I j LL:b y Ll:ti — - - 1 _ I I j II' I I A I I I I I I I N o -------------------- CONCRETE TILE ROOF I j l K,JZ or(TYP.) SEE COLOR j I _ BOARD FOR SPEC. I I I I I I / N I ��•� I � N ------ I L I 1 II� I � I L l:b � I 1 _ Ll•ti { jl G I ! —i��[. bGb _ . I G L L:b I I j ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I G { 1 ! 1 G 1 p 1 I I ,ry4t'» AR,^Jlfy� MONTANA ROOF PLAN @ 2ND FLOOR OPT. } ��r IMME-CRUK RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700ALTON PKYVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 0724.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 F" T-949.500.8947 T-760.7760707 26 N D S 0 C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S r-r __ Naudo oilddsi n n C �I = n= n= n= n _ n „o-,oa MONTANA 2 980 S.F. L yji ARCfyjx ,' {cy nib RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: FIRST FLOOR PLAN 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA - 92618 92270 0 0' T-949.500.8947 T-760.770.0707 tl 27 F O C R E A T E 0 IJ A L 1 o Y P Ii Y S C A t. A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M F N T S aar � v��L�liif.�n RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: 2ND FLOOR PLAN 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: F5 CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 C: - 10, T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 i , r �� 'lr►try i '� - 4 �^�1L +3r.,F. '� �r.�.R „Fa t f !�i 4�� 1�6�•-4 s ' �; "''' - a •fir r � � '�. 5'�.�'1►'t�►ti �,�'";f�,+��,"''�;ti"-� f � M��,-�aa�p'• *.. - MW MW It— S Mµ i r M h ,e li r .r �J y' - - - l'1.�....•�4�•....�-..— •T•w �` #'✓!" r ° �-fie: i� View FF oil v IV " of !01 � 10 C R E A T E Q U A L I I Y P H M S I C A L A N D 5 0 C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T T 5B MOLLINO STONE C8FFK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT Na. 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 1370D AITON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 100713 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA - 92618 92270 0 I' 3 T-949500.8947 T-760770-0707 fR18 5 T n P C C A T C n 11 e I 1 T V 6 U v e 1 f AND SOCIAL ENV TS ---------------------------------- LEFT RIGHT MOLLINO U!n ------------------ ST�I��REEK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 10.07.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 0 1' — 10 T-949.5008947 T-760.770-.0707 DC REAF T O C R E A T E U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N 0 S 0 C I A L E N 1 E N T S l �i !%�lXiXiiR! iiAiAllfR.! !�lAiAi� ;ysi2.l1. J LEFT RIGHT STONE CREEK MO L L I N O RFL DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR- IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE; 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 6 1, 10 T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 ER21 34 D�� I T � (-I-) I W MOLLINO ROOF PLAN STONE CREEK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 0724.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 T-949.500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 R6 35 K TO CR E A T E 0 U A L I T Y PPIYSICA L AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS 1 q4n ARriIFy, r` MOLLINO ROOF PLAN @ OPT.4;; 4 STONE GREEI[ on coall RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 1" 5' I0 T-949 500 8947 T-760.7M.0707 R7 36 16U T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S 0 10 .,ta-.se MOLLINO 3339 OPT. BATHS ykti �ueG�,�7� P� S.F. STONE -CREEK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO; 13016 TITLE: 1 ST FLOOR PLAN 13700ALTON PKWY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07,24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 T-949.500 8947 T-760770..0707 F6 sal T O C R E A T E 0 U A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L E N V I R O N M E N T S I MOLLINO 637 S.F. (2ND FLOOR OPT.), ua,> ffgNE CRff.K chi RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: 2ND FLOOR PLAN 13700ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA rm 92618 92270 0 I- t1€. T-949.500 8947 T-760.7706.0707 F7 38 ?�6 L EN VI#1ONMEN TS DC-1 CANTERRA STOAHREEK RFTDESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECTNO 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKWY I I CASSIS OR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE 1007 13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 01_ 92618 92270 ;l ' �f0' T 949 500 8947 T 760 770 0707 ER22 9 T C/DC CANTS RRA m STONE CREEK u RFF DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE. ELEVATIONS 13700ALTON PKWY I I CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 1007.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 ;i 'i' t' 10 T-9495008947 T-760.770�.0707 ER23 t�Q T O C R E A T E Q U A L I T Y P 11 Y j I C A I V I R O N M E N T El 0 El � -1 7R ��El 10 RIGHT LEFT REAR CANTERRA 41 �y5 r`Rryrr w.eaw� TIE CREEK RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ELEVATIONS 13700 ALTON PKVVY I 1 CASSIS CIR. IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE:07.24.13 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA _ 92618 92270 0 1 II ER24 T-949.500.8947 T-760770-.0707 �1 A L I T Y P H Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L IE ::ONCRETE TILE ROOF TYP.) SEE COLOR 30ARD FOR SPEC. r� CANTERRA ROOF PLAN STIN Cliff 4 RFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: ROOF PLAN 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR, IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 07.24.13 SCALE: Ro CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 92618 92270 1 5 D' T-949.500.8947 T-760,770-0707 /? 1 42 \� UJf V Y S I C A L A N D S O C I A L ENVI RON MENTS CANTERRA 3006 S.F. FIN AllCrrrj , Tnu RIFT DESIGN TOLL BROTHERS PROJECT NO: 13016 TITLE: FLOOR PLAN 13700 ALTON PKVVY 11 CASSIS CIR IRVINE RANCHO MIRAGE DATE: 072413 SCALE: CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA p"_ 92618 92270 a r 10' T-949 500.8947 T-760.770-.0707 F8 43 �o IN ME CITY OF LA 4UIRITA. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OFCALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURAL COLOR SCHEMES EXHIBIT ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOFTILE _ BEL AIR 4689 STUCCO (PRIMARY) PERFECT GREIGE SW 6073 STUCCO ACCENT I SPALgNG GRAY SW 6074 STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE (,P C ELEV GARRET GRAY SW 6075 STONE VENEER CORONADO STONE O DC ELEV. COUNTRY RUBBLE _ ANTIGUE CREAM WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR C1M JIBE 1 C/R I11NE CI® ill RIi1ElS ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOF 113E CAPISTRANO 3636 STUCCO GREEK VILLA (PRIMARY) SW 7551 STUCCO ACCENT I - KEYSTONE GARAGE DOOR SW 7504 STUCCO 2 V ILO STONEE SB SB ELEV BREVITY BROWN SW 6068 STONE VENEER r CORONADO STONE 6 T ELEV. COUNTRY RUBBLE .T LORADO WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE CIlll ICU[ 6 T/11 ITME MEEl TII1111TIM um ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOFTKE BEL AIR 4687 STUCCO (PRIMARY) BASKET BEIGE SW 6143 STUCCO ACCENT I BURLAP SW 6137 STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE @ C ELEV �i DAPPER TAN SW 6144 STONE ACCENT+� �' - CORONADO STONE ® DC D_Ey l � COUNTRY RUBBLE �m ANTIQUE CREAM WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR COLOR SCIE E 2 C/DC ITDIE MEET 1111MITlaa a= ROOF TILE tI EAGLE ROOF TILE CAPISTRANO I 3636 STUCCO - - - MEXICAN SAND (PRIMARY) SW 7519 STUCCO ACCENT 1/ GARAGE DOOR KAFFEE SW 6104 STUCCO ACCENT 2 j— j ILO STONE @ SB ELEv � Sw WdO95DS STONE VENEER CORONADO SIONE 01 ELEV SO% VOTERRA vILLA SD%VERONA VILLA WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE iK11 aaE11E 1 T/al STME C1EEl 1111111ml 1LSR ROOF TILE - - EAGLE ROOFTI E BEL AIR 46M STUCCO (PRIMARYJ TONY TAUPE SW 7038 STUCCO ACCENT SMOKEHOUSE SW 7040 STUCCO ACENT2 ILO STONE @ C ELEV BREVITY BROWN S W 6068 STONE VENEER CORONADO STONE ID DC ELEV. COUNTRY RUBBLE PHOENIX WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR Nul ICIENIE 1 C/IC Till mm an w 1. I La .l ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOF 117E CAPISTRANO 3773 STUCCO — HOPSAC (PRIMARY) SW 6109 STUCCO ACCENT 1/ GARAGE DOOR KAFFE SW 6104 STUCCO ACCENT 2 COBBLE BROWN ILO STONE @ SB ELEV SW 6082 STONE VENEER CORONADO STONE a I ELEV. 50% VOTERRA VILLA 50%VERONA VILLA WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD ® BRONZE HIM I T/0 STONE CIRI Till amt LL1NC B L 1 wr ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOFTILE BEL AIR 4687 STUCCO SANDS OF TIME SW6101 STUCCO ACCENT KAFFE swdla STUCCO ACCENT 2 TANBARK ILO STONE AT C ELEV SW 606E STONE VENEER CORONADO STONE O DC ELEV. COUNTRY RUBBLE PHOENIX WINDOW FRAMES STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR CRII THEME 4 C/x ITINE MEEK 1El IIDTlEl1 ROOF TILE EAGLE ROOF TLE CAPISTRANO 3773 STUCCO ANTIQUARIAN (PRIMARY) SW 0045 STUCCO ACCENT I/ GARAGE DOOR OTTER SW 6041 57UCCO ACCENT 2 SENSATIONAL SAND ILO STONE @ SB ELEV SW 6094 STONE VENEER CORONADO STONE @ T ELEV COUNTRY RUBBLE - `` LORADO WINDOW FRAMES �. STANDARD BRONZE Pill ailE1TE I T/Sl STONE MEET Till MITIEla No ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT I / GARAGE DOOR STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE @ SB ELEV STONE VENEER @ T ELEV WINDOW FRAMES 0 Will SCM I T/Sl STNE Cum TILL OMNI EAGLE ROOF TILE CAPISTRANO 3773 ANTIQUARIAN SW 0045 OTTER SW 6041 SENSATIONAL SAND SW 6094 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE LORADO STANDARD BRONZE m 45 ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 / GARAGE DOOR STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE @ SB ELEV STONE VENEER 0 T ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES Clill SCENE 7 T/Sl STONE ClEft TOLL 111TIMS BAN EAGLE ROOF TILE CAPISTRANO 3773 HOPSAC SW 6109 KAFEE SW 6104 COBBLE BROWN SW 6082 CORONADO STONE 50% VOTERRA VILLA 50%VERONA VILLA STANDARD BRONZE m �Ao ROOF TILE STUCCO 1PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 / GARAGE DOOR STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE Q SB ELEV STONE VENEER 0 T ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES M EAGLE ROOF TILE CAPISTRANO 3636 MEXICAN SAND SW 7519 KAFFEE SW 6104 TOASTY SW 6095 CORONADO STONE 50% VOTERRA VILLA 50%VERONA VILLA STANDARD BRONZE LR ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 / GARAGE DOOR STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE SB ELEV STONE VENEER T ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES uAll r MIN SCENE I T/Sl STME ClEft T111 111TIER: witi EAGLE ROOF TILE CAPISTRANO 3636 GREEK VILLA SW 7551 KEYSTONE SW 7504 BREVITY BROWN SW 6068 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE LORADO STANDARD BRONZE ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE AT C ELEV STONE VENEER 0 DC ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES EAGLE ROOFTILE BEL AIR 4687 SANDS OF TIME SW 6101 KAFFE SW 6104 TANBARK SIN 6061 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE PHOENIX STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR COLN SCM A VIC STME CIR TOLL 111TIN: ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 STUCCO ACENT 2 ILO STONE @ C ELEV STONE VENEER 0 DC ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES EAGLE ROOFTILE BEL AIR 4689 TONY TAUPE SW 7038 SMOKEHOUSE SW 7040 BREVITY BROWN SW 6068 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE PHOENIX STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR RM SCM 3cnc UNC181 TOLLNT138 uo m[ I i m ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE @ C ELEV STONE ACCENT @ DC ELEV WINDOW FRAMES EAGLE ROOFTILE BEL AIR 4687 BASKET BEIGE SW 6143 BURLAP SW 6137 DAPPER TAN SW 6144 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE ANTIQUE CREAM STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR COLOR SCNHE s C/6C $To[ Cin TILL 111TIMS m ROOF TILE STUCCO (PRIMARY) STUCCO ACCENT 1 STUCCO ACCENT 2 ILO STONE @ C ELEV STONE VENEER 0 DC ELEV. WINDOW FRAMES EAGLE ROOFTILE BEL AIR 4689 PERFECT GREIGE SW 6073 SPALDING GRAY SW 6074 GARRET GRAY SW 6075 CORONADO STONE COUNTRY RUBBLE ANTIQUE CREAM STANDARD BRONZE GARAGE DOORS TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COLOR Clio INNE I C/C ITNECIM nun ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING EXHIBIT P5736-129 Category: outdoor ROOT Type Outdoor Lighting Finish: Architectural Bronze Style Corit� rnhinar;+lvloderri Family: Anson MSRP/Retail 1 10 EXTERIOR LFIITN6 FIXTURE C/DC ELEVATMN GENERAL INFO SKU: P5875.20WB Category: Outdoor Family: Ashmore Finish: Antique Bronze Width: 8.30' Height: 16.5f8" Lamp Quantity: one Lamp Type: OU•24 Wattage: 25 Energy Efficient Energy Star Compliant EXTMM LIEN M FIXTURE T/SB ELEVAM LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR: TRACT NO. 30834 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA SHEET INDEX: OWNER / DEVELOPER L-CS COVER SHEET TOLL BROTHERS, INC L-1.0 FRONT YARD PLANTING TYPICALS 11 Cassis Circle Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 L-1.1 FRONT YARD PLANTING TYPICALS (760) 770-0707 Fax: (760) 770-0766 L-1.2 FRONT YARD PLANTING TYPICALS L-2.0 FRONT YARD LIGHTING TYPICALS L-2.1 FRONT YARD LIGHTING TYPICALS L-2.2 FRONT YARD LIGHTING TYPICALS LD-1 PLANTING DETAILS VICINITY MAP: NOT TO SCALE I r pE 10 halm �� a 4 �¢, La Quin Indian MA �n Wells WEST q} 4Y r •1A Stone Creek Rancho Ranch Mirage Important Notice - Underground Service Alert sates u7Nmr d o. e...,..+ w m+n 7o rNrl q�uara W+Jn' ke ed m✓rn a aTaml ti Em.s" A M wk fa ipr aA ya LLWrp�1 Me1Aa nt u�pyWei �M Ypl tlll iWi tl ,�+IW�YR-I&a Ho wlfp � Mm p aN m mod ulcecm of iprh m Ieh p+0.K. CNN aepAl s� han a. oqe rleyymce of KEY MAP: NOT TO SCALE pi Arn. mm Ranch COVER SHEET yo oAi4 . MY! 3WIfUEEN 4ANG1+ 11�711!m eev.+e 5NCEl aa' n-1-1a Iwr�rve nm omwww. us o w.. AY ialllllllt•! 'J30 Rely! ,..ecNl. �y kYFi I'K7c TIM L-CS •1-R SY "L t �ii O r�l BOD/'ll-l: lnl., + + PLAN 1 PASILLO ��r`—,tr STREET NOTE: ALL TURF AREAS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 6' WIDE. Go"vNriqu ulle'EeW 4w- MIL h-IRR?fmi NU F-AY a W1 LY.ElvauwA Pu^y uv"chen vuilrplsl' M M rgwed to G.>Ume we mY mrp'aIr s1xrnNllllr b EL vAil'vnI '>MeP aN [a.rR Mca"rtrclr:. N IM1I paM.t INLJrrL NM r I'e revs vnJ Pei 1Y ",p II h eNtF^.rI .Mtl b1 meat lu OpIY r�tiNEuir �d 1 b fades k" dr.J wua I,Nn m9 luu4uElim mmncla nnlw mYr+1 In advent v�'Y a ouJ yr'mn�ma�i wA w Vw ¢raktt�nt.alrs] WbItlY nh.g Av�i I�I.31 I.yflyu a u e...1Yi perms IMRZIflEILdiOlICE UadEr � `Alen M ierl'Itl t h 4smIIWr � o Iy Nrs H -fgTis RVIJ Y kwd IdF1 t 14ed I.Cv¢�AP M 4 wH PV lrr SL IS! tt,4F[wM .nrtN .m IVMggreW Sn�ee M l 1011 Ifd1 d t AU-31l-Tge M .+. W PLANT LIST FOR PLAN I "PASILLO" T— Quantity Symbol Scientific Name common Name I Planting Size 2 O Tlpuene Tlpu TI u Tree 24"-Box Multi tr. Pa Im Quentlt Symbol Sclentlflc Name Common Neme�Fiantlnq2 Chemeerope humllle MedlLerraneen 21100.9 tools TobUatA Mexican fen e Quantit Symrb-�ol Sclentlflc Name Common Name Planting Slze 14 V Carl -a g.'Boxwood Beauty' Boxwood Beauty 5-Gel fl wo"raioe pavl Flora Red Yucca 5-6e1 11 Lantana montevidensle Purple Lantana 5-Gel 9 Leucophyllum rrutescens Texas Ranger 5-Gal CO 2'-4' Dla. Granite. Boulders By Bouthwest Boulders 1 Stone Desert Gold 3/5" minus decomposed granite by Southwest Boulder J Stone - 2" depth In all shrub planters NOTE: GONTRAGTOR TO VERIFT PLANT QUANI II ItS. SEE SHEET LD-1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES PLANT LIST FOR PLAN 2 "ENTRADA" Tree Quentlty Symbol Sclentlflc Name Common Name Plantln Size 2 1 Tlpuana Tlpu I T(pu Tree 24"-Box Multi Oe I - Quantity Symbol Scientific Name common Name Plantln Slze 2 chamaerope humllle Mediterranean fan palm 24"-Box 2 UkaHingtonla fobueta Mexican ran palm V-10' Ht. Sh ub Quentlt Symbol 9clentlflc Name _ Common Name Planting Size 20 carieea Q. 'Boxwood Beauty' Boxwood Beauty 5-Gel 6 Leucophyllum Frutescene Texee Ran.. er 5-Gel 9 Hae ara loe avirlora Red Yucca 5-Gel Quenllty Symbol SClentl Flc Name Common Name Planting Slze 20 Lantana montevideneis Fur le Lantana 5-Gal _ 2'-4' Dla. Granite Boulders By Southwest Boulders J Stone Desert Gold 315" minus decomposed granite by Southwest Boulder J Stone - 2" depth In all shrub planters NOTE: GONTRAGTOR TO VERIFT r'LANI GalAN I I I Ito. -I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND HAVE APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE IRRIGATION PLAN. - TREES, PLANTS, WALLS, SIDEWALKIL AND PERMANENT STRUCTURES OF ANY MIND SHALL NOT BE PLANTED, INSTALLED OR BUILT IN OV WD AND USSR EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-0P WAY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING AN ENCROACHMENT POWI T FROM CV WD NO TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF CV WD IRRIGATION, SEWER AND WATERLINES 0 If_2 SCALE: 1/8'-1'-O' ItEv ©w NO _ DATE TYPE 1 9Y I Ins waLG: twm eI�T*no. R.rNnerumlvl DAM 94"1 LIPIIIST ofea aRtit now sr. TITS awmw. Y: AV L-imalI lttw PLPIWB 1 SHEET NO I�e L-1.0 PLANT LIST FOR PLAN 3 'MONTANA' Tree Quantity I Symbol scientifrc Name Common Name Planting Size Schlnus Molle Callrornla Pepper 24"-Box MuN tr NOTE: ALL TURF AREAS TO BE A MINIMUM OF Palm b' WIDE. Dwli4lr emee[Cs apnR Ual w omwb�re vie dly'wuyled re+IVre4eli � tM e � dlrrltl W 1taN r' ��lup � FoktL kk�§•p �Id�xF�pTme urs preNrp INI tlh4 rrtirYwnnl. IAdI k mad{ to q®Ir eanlirwYr and net yr kll:d 1� apeW�IIB'YhyM1pH1� pie opnd�dlim MlrsStvr luNlnr rgrwn en dalvm hinpllr mA hde Iprrmn� d�rl,�tlon 1w Pap 1,„irmrih9 IhRlly vh a � .re. rr/grin W Idld7r pral�ap. mpoftarIt Nath - Un4ormand Sg&c Alffj Spey, lyTryul r d n. w.ral tw wire ac ttt Idpllwr duynr w rp.N I>r n o prAT b YehrM' dl M rsH. rp pp y4 ad karYpdga ymr an ,2 1 5min iilli Tle.l. ea el 1.1mq-]17•7EN to M+q 6* Alm nu N Quenllly bol Scientific Name Common Name Planting 51ze 2 -hamaerope humllle Mediterranean fan palm 24"-5ox I Waehingtonla robueta Mexican fan palm 1,4, - 6' Quantity bol Baientifrc Name Common Name Planting Blze 23 Carlssa Q. 'Boxwood Beauty' Boxwood Beauty 5-Gel 2 a Hibiscus rose-slnansis Chinese hibiscus 15-6al If, Leucophyllum Frutescens Texas Ranger 5-Gel rr��pvdr,� y 5ymbol 5cienlrrrc Name Common Name Planting Size r Q I Lantana monLevidensre I TrawrIe lanlana 5-Gal r�pp 14 brld Bermuda "TIFGREEN 320" 7-4' Dla, Granite boulders By Southwest 5oulders Desert Gold 3/0" minus decomposed granite by Southwest Boulder t Stone - 2" depth In all shrub planters NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANT QUANTITIES. SEE SHEET LD-1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES Aa- 1 f y�� r -_r PLAN 4 �;rMOLLINO <.� III 'r 0 PLANT LIST FOR PLAN 4 'MOLLINO' T— Quantfl mbol Scfentrrlc Name Common Name I Planting Slze I O Schinus Molle California Pepper 24"-15ox Multi tr. QuantlLy Symbol Sclentrrlc Name Common Name Planting 51zIr, 2 Chamaerops hulnihe Mediterranean ran palm 24"-Box Mu 2 lUeehinglonra robuete Mexican fen palm V-l2' HT.. ri,,,H Quenllly Symbol Bcfentrrlc Name Common Name Planting Size 21 Hesperaloe pavirlora Red Yucca 5-Gal 11 Carfesa g.'Boxwood Beauty' Boxwood Beauty 5-Gal 5 Carfeea 9.'TuttleP Natal Plum 5-Gel 12 Hemerocallre hybrid DaTlfly 5-Gal I Beaucernea racurvata Elephant Foot Tree 3' HT. Multi tr. Elv— Thevetra peruviana Yellow oleander 15-Gel Leucophyllum rruteecens Texas Ranger F Gal Ly S mbol Bclentlflc Name Common Name Planting 51ze r3- d Lantana montevidensis Trailing lantar 5-Gal SOD Hybrid Bermuda "TIFGREEN 32B" 2'-4' Dla. Granite boulders EIj Southwest 5oulders Stone Desert Gold 3/0" minus decomposed granite by Southwest Boulder I $tone - 2" depth In all shrub plantere NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANT QUANTITIES, 1HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRRERLAOF THE ORDINANCE AND HAVE APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE IRRIGATION PLAN.• TREES, PLANTS, WALLS. SIDEWALKS. AND PERMANENT STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND SHALL NOT BE PLAITED, INSTALLED OR BUILT IN CV WD AND USSR EASEMENTS OR RKIHIT-0 WAY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM CVWD NO TREES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF CV WD IRRIGATION, SEWER AND WATERLINEe O 8 16MMMMEAMMMMY 32 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" STONECREEK RANCH TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANE)SCAPE LA QUINTA CALJFOKNIA NO DATE WK we "IeliSy- ROXIKREa1 RrIR'Yt offifff till! TSIaeLPLAKTNQI Som wNR EMM IQe w US 101N UMIIIS _ Ias RmS- FY i STw NO. � . ,75—W T .ILuclMi, a dleU rgrfn R.I H ectpd++ae drh gnv i} a aplbf cefaNutllu. N'di'eR [all4 1 nxF • p IaYep b aaaea ads mdaaryYxe Ialpxl.l�ll b W aqe maser anq - ttw I � lur er u,e palNl i,eua+a Irony eI � Tana tletl gapnlf. tAek Ih11 IegJsvnl d Le w6 !a mNl rmMtrrrMr ux net 1+kMw lr dlalln Mir nvbp lippa, a+ia uwxixua mrbslMIN YEp. b Ja4+i FJver,Nr x,tl Irdtl PaAawriW Irvlaeaa ft. T Mrtl tll IWctp wlmemtt A .ark en Klh Fu I, nLgrBy WHIR(0W Yam 1 da a prariiVid Imoorlont Notice - Underground Service Alert .*001$xM217 • qA1'bBaK,>+bM LL.eILriAe'leYAefyGaadM+t mr.alwCP.mlH„a Y�ME.w4 0w .kM iruAIM NI-=b1rfAM -4e CURB STREET PLANT LIST FOR PLAN 5 'GANTERRA' Tree Quantity I symbol I Scientiric Name Common Name Planting Size I 1 0 1 SChfnUS Molle California Pelvl2er 41'- Multi Lr Pa Im Quantity Symbol scientfric Name Common Name Planting Size 2 # Chamaerops humllfe Mediterranean ran Ivaim 24"-Box Multi tr. Shrub Quantity Symbol Scientfrfc Name Common Name Planting Size I Nesperaloe pavrrlora Red Yucca 5-Gal 15 Carfsea g.'Boxwood Beauty' Boxwood Beauty 5-Gal 8 Hemerocallfs hybrid Daglly 5-Gal 1 Thevetla peruviana Yellow oleander 15-5al Multr Trunk 11 Leucophyllum frutescens Texas Ranger 5-Gal Vine / Groundcover ouantitw sigmboi scfentlrfa Name Common Name Planting Size 6 (D Lantana 'New Gold' Yellow lantana 5-Gal 2'-4' Dla. Desert Chocolate Boulders Desert Gold 3/8" mine decomposed granite by Southwest Boulder / Stone - 2" depth In all shrub planter& NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANT QUANTITIES. SEE SHEET LD-1 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES -1 HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND HAVE APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE IRRIGATION PLAN. - TREES, PLANTS, WALLS, SIDEWALKS. AND PERMMJENr STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND SWILL NOT BE PLANTED, INSTALLED Oft BUILT IN CV WD AND USSR EASEMENTS OR RIGHT -OF WAY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING AN ENCROApIMENT PERNIM FROM CV WD NO TRESS TO BE tGCJ TED WITHIN 10 FEET OF GV WD IRRIGATION, SEWER AND WATERLINES r� 16 SCALE-8 =1'-0" mSN$R SIMI Mnana _ TrMa nAM 10rha 001Ta KVKSE aala]tTEt /IMYfMBM 0-aaa& Tim DIMMIM W tnaKmmK taE Pia1M- tY NQ - TMw L-1.2 al�ls ELECTRICAL NOTES 5ETBACK NOT I ELECTRICIAN IS TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND I LOCATE LIGHT FIXTURES A MIN, OF 4'-0" FROM EDGE OF TREE DOCUMENTS, ETC. AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED APPROVALS AND PERMITS. 2, LOCATE LIGHT FIXTURES 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF PALMS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, ELECTRICIAN 15 TO SIZE AND S. AT ALL TIMES A CONSCIOUS EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO CIRCUIT ALL ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. (I.E. LIGHTS, PUMPS, POOL PLACE LIGHT FIXTURES IN PLANTER BEDS INSTEAD OF LAWN AREAS EQUIPMENT, TIME CLOCKS, IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS, E7C.J IS TO PROVIDE BUILTS. 4. THESE MEASUREMENTS AREA 5UPERSEEDED ONLY WHEN S. ALL MATECTOR A S. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMANBHIP SHALL CONFORM 70 ALL GOVERNING CODES FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT CHANGE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I 4, COORDINATE ALL WORK, ESPECIALLY SLEEVING, TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING WITH IRRIGATION, CONCRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED. 5_ LIGHTING CONTROLLERS WILL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS 6, ELECTRICIAN 15 TO CONFIRM EXACT TREE LOCATION 50 AS TO INSURE PROPER "1 ALL JUNCTION BOXES WITHOUT A LIGHT FIXTURE WILL BE RUT IN A CARBON BELOW 8. JUNCTION BOXES ON WALK LIGHTS ARE TO BE 6' TO 8" ABOVE FINISH GRADE MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX THESE NEED TO BE 6" MIN AWAY FROM 9. LIGHT FIXTURES LOCATED WITHIN (10) TEN FEET FROM EDGE OF WATERFEATURES ARE TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A GFCI PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS PLAN 10. THE DESIGNER SHALL IN NO WAY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE METHODS AND MEANS OF INSTALLATION, SAFETY IWON, OR ABOUT THE SITE, PERFORMANCE OF WORK II. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE FIXTU;05 AT NIGHT TO ELIMINATE GLARE AND INSURE OPTIMUM LIGHTING EFFECT. 12. ALL WIRE SHOULD RUN PARALLE TO HARD SURFACES, SUCH AS 510EWALKS, 15. ALL MATERIALS AND AORMAN5HIP SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING CODES AND ORDINANCES AND ACCEPTABLE 5TANCAR175 OF PRACTICE 14, COORDINATE ALL AORK, ESPECIALLY 5LEEVIN6, TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING WITH IRRIGATION, CONCRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING SLEEVES 15. ALL 120 VOLT OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE 16 THE LIGHTING PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND 15 NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT LOCATION OF CABLE RUNS. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL RUN WIRE5 TO BEST SUIT FIELD CONDITIONS AN AS -BUILT PLAN 19 TO BE COMPLETED AND LEFT WITH THE CANER. r --- --� Ilr � I ° ) } a h SOD f 3 aq - �{ PLAN 1 PASILLO STREET STREET { T cl LIGHTING SCHEDULE BYR60L OTY. FIXTURE COMMENTS Model: 15143 AZT, 8.5 W 4 60' wide flood LED TREE FLOOD LIGHT Electrical: 12V /'y 2 Model: 15132 AZT, 45 W C a 1 60' flood '�•J' ACCENTS LED ACCENT LIGHT Electrical: 12V Model: PR 8erlee Canriruatbn conhoat. ogre.. Thal h, oaordonoa .Hh garardy ..mlw tanelrvdlon T r TRANSFORMER pocllm, aanetWmn canlracla A be requ to — W. oM aamplete «aponebfily tar A to onetime dxtg we — of rnrrlmotw of the pr.).4 i Vj wfoty of d p o Eleetrl': Ik 12V aW prowy,, awl Ihb re Vem,t " be made to Wly amWm4y oM not to ftKod to. normal w kg home. a,W emrLa t'en °anlroetar Vkher W— to defrod i*-Ify oW hold — NOTE: COnetraetor w varl tlYggM.a yqlaaRlltl� loafore ordering. deeign prv-&ono hdmine.om ony oM d Way, red or d" F cam, IW Wlh the prrlor . d na,w m wt proi., .„any lWt, ma,g Ir a W. neggmee of d d , Llghte available Lrrnurah fnJ kICEA L, GHTIW. Fdr contact Chuck Hoc~ at (160) 945-0999 caIli any que.tI_ plea.. (BIB) 519-0241 �f0f°"b"d' chuckochea lee Incr-om gpggkarrt Nal�g�Xq�ound $CrS�C ICI$] WHM rk ^+•s'tr� 14+L, to tad Won u '1'and to —V .d N 01 1. w Ik NW 4i , Or pmw -r1 dial rr.0 d I-+�R-)y)-1 fn Mrq darn Wte: Tu ,k W. LIGHTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL OTY. FIXTURE COMMENTS Modat. WWI AZT." W 4 60' wide flood LED TREE FLOOD LIGHT Electrical: 12V Model: 15132 AZT, 45 W ACCENTS 2 60' flood LED ACCENT LIGHT Electrical: 12V Mod _. ■ I Elacterllcaaa. l: 12V TRANSFORMER NOTE: CaMtr5mor to v Tryy IIcqNM++p quantlll.e barore—dering_ Ltphl. aVallai�Fa eh qh CICa10ER LIGHTING. fior aify q tldea please contact CFYGk Wmovor at f160) 9A9'-0999 Y.IU (4) 515=461 eiurJc9th.alantnctadn b 32 SCALE: 1/8'-1'-O' REY001,1,. ND DATE TYKE 9Y �aa lava. lr[tlIYr�LwfW5y1 wt�it9flt YNOMKLW G'IC YNW tywtwp I'"t wR@IN[C{'1! law.nwm afF mtskum 1 Sfl&T NO.. L-2.0 J as� lz�,Z9 t�I'ZS' Ise PLAN 3 "« tom.. MONTANA .O I I J a tD � C W,,o(. I 11 T L k•' LTC-sI—ITINC� SCHEDULE 1M00L C2TY. FIXTURE COMMENTS Model: 15143 AZT, 0.5 W 2 60' Wide flood LED TREE FLOOD LIGHT Electrical: 12V (. p (D 2 Model• 15132 AZT, 45 W 60' flood ACCENTS LED ACCENT LIGHT �.1 Elaclricel: 12V Modal: PR Serlee T TRANSFORMER Electrica I: 12 V NOTE: Conetrector to verify lights gUantltlee before ordering. Llghte avallable Uhough KIGHLER LIGHTING. For any que9Llo Please contact CYuck Hoover at (160) 945-0999 cell: (61$) 519-0241 chuckmchse lee Ine,com cmbuW wIr"Iw' m Vint 4 aourdwmi +11% wody —W srN Lw Inerllrw wmvmtii wnumlx Y w rent ro>mm�r,m ow o.,�y.in ,.yrxwlly-kr g4.db .o'dlbal fobs Iln awn. W wn fyr W'w plo}cl .alydrp air e+ Y H n d,d pm: 1}} I9el 1Nr irq��wn�1 Mdl W nuM [u e(K!y IMiwtlr: o-+l ny1 w lynid 1A Wwr sdnrcel WIMP w,I Dial Wnr4upllM tmnntwr Ir11 pW Lela�4 ui(y and rdd bdoeyl PulaehilB LmN.>• Gml my oM WI FN11} latl a Yle�nl M mn�xtllm Wlrc 7 xrbawln � III m Ihb prJpµ ertrt{.Viq ILpiny rang bm, ew nr. nry:7we d J+rq� prolvaionpL Imoortont Notice - Underground Service Alert Unw dref ' IN W'gll I&W.0c k IF TinakiD bd.+tl Ym*N l I LI W "v- lu prw aY Nct ... bx: z im GAIT d l lmll"7_ W I&N dtF erxr ra d'y ELEGTRIGAL NOTES 1. ELECTRICIAN 15 TO PROVIDE ALL NECE55ARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONE DOCUMENTS, ETG- AND OBTAIN ALL REOUIRED APPROVALS AND PERMITS 2, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY GONTRAGTOR, ELECTRICIAN 15 TO' GIRGUIT ALL ELEGTRIGAL REQUIREMENTS 54OWN ON PLANS, (I,E, LIGHTS, F r--, rciv� E(XIPMENT, TIME GLOGKI 5, RRIGATION CONTROLLERS, ETC.) CONTRACTOR 15 TO PROVDE AS GUILTS, 3. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING CODES AND ORDINANCES AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE. 4, COORDINATE ALL WORK, ESPECIALLY 5LEEVING, TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING WITH IRRIGATION, CONCRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED. 5. LIGHTING CONTROLLERS WILL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO IRRI6ATION CONTROLLERS WHENEVER P055151_E, 6. ELECTRICIAN I5 TO CONFIRM EXACT TREE LOCATION 50 AS TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION OF LIGHT FIXTURES -, ALL JUNCTION BOXES WITHOUT A LIGHT FIXTURE WILL BE PUT IN A CAR50N! BELOW GRADE. S. JUNCTION BOXES ON WALK LIGHTS ARE TO BE 6" TO S" ABOVE FIN15H 6RADE MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX, THESE NEED TO BE 6" MIN, AWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE DECKING, 9. LIGHT FIXTURES LOCATED WITHIN (10) TEN FEET FROM EDGE OF HATERFEATURE5 ARE TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A GFCI PER ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS PLAN AND PER LOCAL AND COUNTY CODE5. 10. THE DESIGNER SHALL IN NO WAY BE HELD RE5PON510LE FOR THE METHODS AND MEANS OF I145TALLATION, SAFETY I WON, OR ABOUT THE SITE, PERFORMANCE OF WORK OR TIMELINC55 IN WHICH WORK 15 PERFORMED. 11THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE FIXTURES AT NIGHT TO ELIMINATE GLARE AND INSURE OPTIMUM LIGHTING EFFECT 12. ALL WIRE SHOULD RUN PARALLE TO HARD SURFACES, SUCH AS SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND WALLS, WHEN POSSIBLE. 11. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMAN5HIP SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING GODE5 AND ORDINANCES AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, 14, GOORDINATE ALL HORK, ESPECIALLY 5LEEVING, TRENCHING AND BAGKFILLING WITH RRIOATION, GONGRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REOUIRED, THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FLACIN6 SLEEVES UNDER THE HARD SURFACES, USING A I -INCH PIPE MINIMUM. 15, ALL 120 VOLT OUT51DE ELECTRICAL OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE 6FI AS PER NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. Ib. THE LIGHTING PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND 15 NOT INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT LOCATION OF GABLE RUNS, THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL RUN WIRES TO BEST SUIT FIELD CONDITIONS. AN AS -BUILT PLAN 15 TO BE COMPLETED AND LEFT WITH THE OWNER. 0 02 ih�r r PLAN 4 MOLLINO 111 lki 11 r-= — — �[FJ\OI jI r �- I a1', e L ICsHTINCz SCHEDULE s rMaOL GFTY FIXTURE COMMENTS Model: 15143 AZT, 65 W 3 60' wide flood LED TREE FLOOD LIGHT E lectr ice I: 12 V ,r^� Model: 15132 AZT, 45 W ACCENTS [ ] 2 60, flood LED ACCENT LIGHT Electrical: 12V Model: PR Series T I TRANSFORMER Electrlca k. @V NOTE: Ccnetraetor to usury lights gUarullse before ordering. Llghte avalleble through KIGHLER LIGHTING. For any c etlone please contact CFuck Hoover at (160) 545-0599 cell: (010) S15-0241 cFuckacheeleelnccom SETBACK NOTES I., LOCATE LIGHT FIXTURES A MIN, OF 4'-0" FROM EDGE OF TREE 2. LOCATE LIOHT FI XTURE5 I'-O" FROM EDGE OF PALMS. B. AT ALL TIMES A GON5CIOU5 EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO PLACE LIGHT FIXTURES IN PLANTER BEDS INSTEAD OF LAWN AREAS O 5 I6 52 4.. THESE MEASUREMENTS AREA 5UPERSEEDED ONLY WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT CHANGE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SCALE: IFS" = I'-m" STONECREEK RANCH TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE LA QUINTA GWFORNU Nt! TAME M! ffrm l�N i wwymm 1yMV&rdm7/1ar1" wft Wry MoLm R1k M'k6'IRIRy� miiiiiii,iiii MM1 Ty4I DOW"" SV wm 1 1m IU>ALt1R fVn � 3F$T NO: InWx L-2.1 L� I TRIGAL NOT I. ELECTRICIAN 15 TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DOCUMENTS, ETC, AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED APPROVALS AND PERMITS, 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, ELECTRICIAN 15 TO SIZE AND CIRCUIT ALL ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON PLANS. (I.E. LIGHTS, PUMPS, POOL EQUIPMENT, TIME CLOCKS, IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS, ETC.) CONTRACTOR 15 TO PROVIDE AS BUILT5. B. ALL MATERIALS AND WORMAN5HIP SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNIN6 CODES AND ORDINANCES AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE 4 COORDINATE ALL HORK, ESPECIALLY SLEEVIN6, TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING WITH IRRIGATION, CONCRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED. 5 LIGHTING CONTROLLERS WILL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS WHENEVER P0951BLE 6 ELECTRICIAN 15 TO CONFIRM EXACT TREE LOCATION 50 AS TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION OF LIGHT FIXTURES. "1 ALL JUNCTION BOXES WITHOUT A LIGHT FIXTURE WILL BE PUT IN A CARSON BELOW GRADE. b. JUNCTION BOXES ON WALK LIGHTS ARE TO BE 6" TO e" ABOVE FINISH GRADE MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX. THESE NEED TO BE 6" MIN, AWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE DECKING 9 LIGHT FIXTURES LOCATED WITHIN (10) TEN FEET FROM EDGE OF WATERFEATURES ARE TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A 6FCI PER ELECTRICAL EN&INEER5 PLAN AMID PER LOCAL AND COUNTY CODES 10. THE DESIGNER SHALL IN NO WAY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE METHODS AND MEANS OF INSTALLATION, SAFETY IN/ON, OR ABOUT THE SITE, PERFORMANCE OF WORK OR TIMELINESS IN WHICH WORK 15 PERFORMED. 11. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RE5PON51BLE FOR ADJJ5TING THE FIXTURES AT NIGHT TO ELIMINATE GLARE AND INSURE OPTIMUM LIGHTING EFFECT. 12. ALL WIRE SHOULD RUN PARALLE TO HARD SURFACES, SUCH A5 51DEWALKS, DRIVENAYS AND HALLS, WHEN POSSIBLE. 13.. ALL MATERIALS AND W0RMAN5HIP SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING CODES AND ORDINANCES AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE 14. COORDINATE ALL WORK, ESPECALLY 5LEEVIN6, TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING WITH IRRIGATION, CONCRETE AND MASONRY SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING SLEEVES UNDER THE HARD 5URFACE5, U51NG A I -INCH PIPE MINIMUM. 15 ALL I20 VOLT OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE GFI AS PER NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. le, THE LI6HTIN6 PLAN 15 DIAGRAMMATIC AND 15 NOT INTENDED TO SHON EXACT LOCATION OF GABLE RUNS. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL RUN WIRES TO BEST SUIT FIELD CONDITIONS. AN AS -BUILT PLAN 15 TO BE COMPLETED AND LEFT WITH THE OWNER. SETBACK NOTES I. LOCATE LIGHT FIXTURES A MIN. OF 4'-0" FROM EDGE OF TREE 2 LOCATE LIGHT FIXTURES 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF PALMS 5. AT ALL TIMES A CONSCIOUS EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO PLACE LIGHT FIXTURES IN PLANTER BEDS INSTEAD OF LAWN AREAS. 4 THESE MEASUREMENTS AREA SUPER5EEDED ONLY WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT CHANGE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CWWYSWI emh awm Ihd N eh Oa"T OkWW-AIWti 49[Liaa ronOWelea cehbogp. �� k HµtW It Oe4� ail Wd OMPNIM rsfrtmAlll W pll i!e rbem�n Yrtrq the (pate O4 «1wYdnbn OI Nr -pl. -6AY 15Otl11 N' M pvua vef awellf bal Ih6 �ea4erxel flrl Ue else to 41tT pelNaualy ud rel w \eltr! W re�J eplaq true, via tgUealYe epwu�ar bVn Knn raveaa-Irol mtl Intl derrbt ferhuCiO4hmr M O[o�ra:�a¢ pn lWilk w9I* yllon. --I enh>I9n eral®emY y�y.,,, mrG(tti! H to Earlr.m 4e+�s u @I Nrl IIee4H t 4�►' W `x1.GM a Teed h rude' W a WC In pe. AI ■.t ge�euoua Y;raal x1 fart: we xixe we+ tt�in/w b -Mil }71-'�¢ Ita s+uW STREET LICsHTINC; SCHEDULE SIMBOL OTr.. FIXTURE C:OMMEt4 T5 Model: 15143 AZT, 85 W I 60' wide flood LED TREE FLOOD LIGHT E leclrlce I: 12 V Model: 15132 AZT, 45 W ACCENTS 2 60' flood LED ACCENT LIGHT ( D Electrical: 12V Model: PR Serlee T TRANSFORMER Electrical: 12 V NOTE: Cone LrAcLOr to verify lighle gluanli Llee baroreB e ordering. Lights through at{ (T160) 94ICHLER L5.0999 calol:r(81 ) SuIS-0241 please clacl Chuck Hoover chuck.chea lae lnc.com 1 , 5 SCALE: 1/8" = I' -m" STONECREEK RANCH TYPICAL FROM YARD LANDSCAPE IA QUlhrrA GWFORNIA RVA50m - NO DATE TYR In -. ee6%� tRt>ti�Of(IIIII.1 MYI1ET Tfl1,R T9Ylu4Il.rM11116PfAI rvat p1m �1-117! lFe7rM1'iYV! m m ITr" tut Hlr1!1!. !WI Rw Not L-2.2 �n ¢ •tN Wi tw NueF 9a •1 -LIq•Fry( !F[ ii1Rf Ile earn ulnw• [i¢ were Y eeYµL _ ICR,C N•1IVC �N+1Ya"y�Y�iR��R a iery RFaa e J„iLi \R[A�1Re riP e F RrMI Yl�• A TREE PLANT 4 DETAIL �FR+I�+eRAve � l ALL CAVITISS AND VOIDS SLOPED GRADE AAE TO BE BURIMP rl !�' PINI#16RADE frTAIN A MINIFaJM OP d' ClELOW r'�HInH eR.Arae - —ALL CAVITIES AND VOIDS LEVEL GRADE ARE To BE EuRleo NOTe BOULDERS IN CL 5TERS ARE TO BOULDER PLACEMENT DETAL BE SET AT VARIED HeIsHT5 pF, GENERAL PLANTING NOTES I. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LICENSED AND CARRY ALL NEGE55ARY WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND BONDS REQUIRED BY THE STATE, 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR, PAY FOR, AND OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. 5_ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH ALL RELATED TRADES. 4. WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIAL ARE EXPECTED TO BE OF THE HI&HE5T STANDARDS AND QUALITY. 5. ALL WORK 15 SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 6. PRIOR TO BEeINNIN& WORK, THE SITE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS, WEEDS, OR ROCKS &BEATER THAN 2' DIAMETER WITH FINI5H-&RA0IN& COMPLETED. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EXI5TIN6 PLANT MATERIAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE IN ORDER TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL EX15TINO CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. -1. GRADE AT PLANTERS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FINISHED &BADE OF ADJACENT HARD50APE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON 6RADIN6 OR BERMINC PLAN, 6. TREAT PLANTED AREAS, DECOMPOSED &RANITE AND GRAVEL AREAS WITH PRE -EMERGENT WEED AGENT PRIOR TO, AND AFTER, C PLAGIN& LANDSCAPE TOPPING AND AS PER MANUFACTURER'S 5PEOIFIGATION5 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PLANTS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ANY CHAN&ES OR SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AT THE TIME OF DELIVERY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE DELIVERY INVOICE TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR HIS REVIEW. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE rULL, HEALTHY, SHAPELY, D15EA5E-FREE, AND INSULT -FRCS. Vell%, OF A SIZE THAT 15 BTANDARD FOR THE NURSERY IM71.[STRY, AND PER THE PLANT LE6E1ho ALL PLANTS ARE SUBJr-f-T TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL. II BEFORE EXCAVATION, PLANTS IN CONTAINERS SHALL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON PLANTING PLAN. OHNER'5 REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE NOTIFIED 56HR5 IN ADVANCE AND SHALL SHE LOCATION OF ALL PLANTS IN THE FIELD AND SHALL INDICATE THE EXACT P051TIONS BEFORE ACTUAL PLANTIN& OPERATIONS PROCEED w LL1VMHAR R AN4 cRPPC IN L•YRI r.•s'tF[ R•M4 R�P�CL RR MIX 1FLn�R/.GNCRLL[ TCRIM 1R •URW4 4IIPNVLCR WVNW[O NAGwP4[ B PALM PLANTING DETAL rreen 4eP4L LA" ARC• v.w RFnp••r-ewwP ,srfiCR Routp �1MFNtt+i Aoterµ�PcoVC4 ll4'IUY-RnN •T O a. __ ANp'•' wRRiMC•F � BEND -A -BOARD DETAIL 12 ALL LARGE PLANTS SHALL BE HANDLED HITH CARE U51NO THE NECESSARY PROPER EQUIPMENT THE CONTRACTOR HILL BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE ALL DAMAGED PLANTS 15, CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD PLANT TABLETS TO ALL PLANT MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTAINER SIZE 14. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IN HOLES AS PER PLANTINe DETAIL (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) TREE AND SHRUB ROOT CROWNS SHALL BE SET FLU5H WITH THE ADJACENT FINISH GRADE ALL SHRUBS TO HAVE BELOW &RAPE HATER RETENTION BASIN WITH GRADUAL 2" SHALE. ALL TREES TO HAVE BELOH CRAPE HATER RETENTION BASIN WITH A 5" GRADUAL SHALE IN PLANTER BEDS AND 2" IN TURF AREAS HATERBASIN TO BE LARGE ENOUGH 50 THAT THERE IS NO HATER RUN-OFF. 15 ALL HOLES SHALL BE THOROUGHLY PRE-SOAKED HITH WATER AND ALLOWED TO DRAIN PRIOR TO PLANTING. 16 ALL SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL BE BACKFILLED HITH 100% NATURAL SOIL. 1-I CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WATERING BASINS AROUND ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 16. TREES (ONLY IF STAKING 15 REOUIRED) 15-SALLON OR LARGER ARE TO BE STAKED HITH 2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE STAKES, 2 PER TREE. REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR PLANTING, STAKING, AND SILYING. 19 ALL TURF AREAS (WHERE APPLICABLE) ARE TO BE GRADED SMOOTH, ROLLED, AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRE5ENTATIVE BEFORE PLANTIN&. 20. ALL BOULDERS (WHERE APPLICABLE) SHALL BE 5ET INTO SOIL 55% OF BOULDER SIZE. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL DE5R15, PLANT BOXES AND CONTAINERS, MATERIALS, SUPPLIES OR EQUIPMENT, LEAVING THE 51TE IN A CLEAN CONDITION UPON COMPLETION OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION 22. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE INSTALLATION FOR A 90-DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HEED ALL PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A NEAT AND GLEAN APPEARANCE; MAINTAIN IRRIGATION AND L119HTIN& 5Y5TEM5 (WHERE APPLICABLE) IN A LIKE -NEW CONDITION; AND APPLY A UNIFORM FERTILIZER APPLICATION AT 50 DAY5, 60 DAYS, AND 90 DAYS, AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN PROPER &ROHTH FOR ALL PLANTING 25. ACCEPTANCE OF LANDSCAPE IN5TALLATION AND MAINTENANCE HILL BE DETERMINED BY THE OHNER'5 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL DEAD OR DAMAGED PLANT MATERIAL WHETHER CAUSED BY OTHER TRADE ACTIVITY AND/OR NATURAL CAU5E5 AT NO EXTRA COST TO OWNER 24. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES., C 6HiUB PLANTNO DETAIL wuR►. i• .*wr e A' rY i F SWALE DETAL w W3W PALM TREE PLANTING NOTES I. Palms Shall be planted using established planting procedures. RcPer to palm tree planting detall. 2. Palm troe root balls shall be trimmed or cut to ensure recovery From transplanting shock. 5. Palm trees must be In a healthy condition at time of dellvery. Palm trees determined unhealthy or damaged at time of delivery or Instollotlon shall be rejected by contractor and replaced by subcontractor at his expense. 4. All palms shall be cleaned of excesslve dead and ragged fronds or frond Stubble. Gut fronds should be cut to a maximum length of 6". 5. Galled out heights OF palms shall be THE HEIGHT FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO BOTTON OF LIVE FRONDS b. Palm trees to bo properly Hatered In and Bo11B properly tamped around the root halls When ph ntima, Ie,nving no Valois OF loll around root balls -l. Palm trees Bh011 be planted Yert.Golllj, unle55 noted QtflerWF$e. 8. Trunks should be roucjh v Ith Frond bases s1:111 securely ottached 9. Trunks may not be totally skMnodunless noted to 40 so, 10. Trunk bases may 120 9kinnea to a maximum height of W 4' (talldr trees b'). 11. Sklnneed areas' above the Et" level "111 zee Occepted, at the cilroctlon OR the Londscape Architect. 12. Care should be exercised In the cabling during transport and planting so as net to darnaae or loosen bark. 15. Severe craG.king or hales in the basal trvni4 area Will not be acceptable. 14. On, InitialNotering w1tl be performed bg aj1b"ntractor, Basin HIII be left on each palm so SLAa rLuant Hollering can too pef fermod by others. Basin Is to k3e removed during finlsh grading.. 15. Subcantrootor to Untle Prond tops (60) days after planting. 16. Palm trees shall Co planted a minlmum of 16" allay From bullding eaves. 11. it Is r.c.Dimmended any palm tree planted Hlthln 5' of any walk, Hall or structure bn plantocl Nith Deep Root root. kaarrler to a depth of 2' minlmum to protect agalnst root damage. IB. Washingtonlo robusto trunks are to hove a minlmum cilometer of 14" measured 4' high on trunk above Plnlsh grade. NOTE: NO PALM TREE SHALL BE OUT OF THE ORIGINAL GROUND FOR MORE THAN (45) HOURS PRIOR TO RELOCATION AND PLANTING. STONECREEK RANCH TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE LA QUNTA CNIFORNIA PLANTING DETAILS �NO BATEREVISIM WK r "N4R eRlA�RYM RR1111 "Ills 1 �NLR 9RR FCFi i+1AR11! B4idRMlIIR! bum" r -+ r rorMlki�k Fr � Na LD-1 (0/ c% 4 Zfv - 5 Qumz G F MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Les Johnson, Community Development Director DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Site Development Permit 2013-930 Stone Creek Ranch — Toll Brothers, Inc. Attached as part of this memorandum, please find correspondence received regarding the subject site development permit application. The correspondence was received by the Community Development Department after the staff report was completed and packets were delivered to the Planning Commission. November 25, 2013 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: November 26, 2013 meeting I would like to be able to briefly speak at this meeting as this project is directly adjacent to my house. I am very happy that the project will be completed. Hopefully it will eventually cut down on the dirt from the vacant lots that we have been enjoying for the last seven years. Plus I am just happy that La Quinta is growing again. We have no major reservations regarding this project. Most of the 76 lots would not affect us at all. But there are approximately 5 to 6 lots that will directly affect us. They run along Coral Mountain Court and those homes would look down into our back yard. Unless they are regraded, those lots have been substantially built up with dirt, effectively reducing the size of the privacy wall on the Stonecreek Ranch side. I would ask for some consideration regarding the setback of those homes, the location of windows for privacy, and the elevation. We had an agreement with the project manager on the original Stonecreek Ranch. We allowed them a fire gate with access through our property, so that they would not have to find a second exit somewhere else. We were told that regarding these few lots that directly abut our property that the homes would be one story and that when built our privacy would be considered. This was a verbal agreement. We are just asking for the same consideration at this time. Sincerely, i Ianiff� r%136'hm Ph 57715 Coral Mountain Court La Quinta, CA 92253 760-899-7297 RECEIVED NOV 2 5 2013 aTy v LA QUIMTA O MMUF M DEVEUPMENT PH 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2013 CASE NUMBER: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2013-1 54 APPLICANT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC. PROPERTY OWNER: WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL TO ALLOW THE TEMPORARY PLACEMENT AND USE OF FIVE (5) TEMPORARY METAL STORAGE CONTAINERS DURING THE 2013 HOLIDAY SEASON LOCATION: 79295 HIGHWAY 111 - WAL-MART RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2013- approving Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 with a Category 4(e) CEQA Exemption, based upon the Findings contained therein and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In September 2013, the Community Development Department issued a holiday reminder letter to all major retail tenants referencing the permit process necessary to utilize cargo containers for temporary holiday storage. To date, only Wal-Mart has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for this purpose, and proposes five (5) bins at the rear portion of the store site, southwest of the loading docks. BACKGROUND The La Quinta Wal-Mart has historically needed excess inventory storage capacity during peak sales periods and has requested temporary facilities for that purpose in the past. The last request was for a one-year CUP to allow four storage bins, which was granted on October 23, 2012 by Planning Commission. Wal-Mart has requested an approval term of 5 years for this CUP to mitigate the annual cost of filing fees (See Attachment 1 and 2 - Project Information Sheet and Site Photographs). CUP 201 3-1 54 Planning Commission Staff Report 11 /26/1 3 Page 1 of 3 PRPOSAL & ANALYSIS With exception of the number of containers requested, the application replicates CUP 2012-145, approved by Planning Commission on October 23, 2012, for four (4) containers. Each container is 8' feet wide, by 48' feet long, by 8.5' feet high (Attachment 3). The containers will be located within a paved area at the southwest corner of Wal-Mart's property and will be screened by a 9' foot high chain -linked fence with an attached 9' foot high green privacy screen. The five storage containers are located approximately 84 feet from the edge of the loading docks. The applicant has stated that the use of the containers will commence upon approval of the CUP and will be removed by January 15, 2014. Public view of the temporary storage containers is limited by the surrounding built environment and the height of the proposed screening. The property to the west is vacant, while trees and an existing 8' foot high block wall limits views from the adjacent Aventine Apartment complex to the south. The location of the containers complies with the sixty (60') foot building setback clearing area for type-V non -rated structures, as per the Building Code. Adequate space exists between the storage containers and the loading docks so as not to affect the traffic pattern or truck turnaround space in the general area. The Applicant has requested a 5 year approval term. The Municipal Code does not specify an expiration period for a CUP; however, the PC may impose a time limitation on establishment of the use, and/or may establish an expiration date on the use permit itself. Staff recommends an approval term to allow for two holiday periods, as the current CUP process for these types of temporary storage uses is under review. AGENCY & PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Agency Review: All comments and conditions from last year's request remain applicable, and have been incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: Notice of the hearing was posted at three public places along with the project site, and notice was also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be provided at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that this proposal CUP 2013-154 Planning Commission Staff Report 11 /26/13 Page 2 of 3 is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to provisions of Section 15304, Class 4(e) (Minor Alterations to Land) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as the proposed project is temporary and will have no effect on the environment. Report prepared by: Wally Nesbit, Principal Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson, Community Development Director Attachment: 1. Project Information Sheet 2. Site Photographs 3. Plan Set CUP 2013-154 Planning Commission Staff Report 11 /26/13 Page 3 of 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING THE USE OF FIVE (5) TEMPORARY METAL STORAGE CONTAINERS DURING THE 2013 AND 2014 HOLIDAY SEASONS CASE NO.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2013-154 WITH A CATEGORY 4(E) CEQA EXEMPTION APPLICANT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 261" day of November 2013, hold a noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Tait & Associates, Inc. to allow five temporary outdoor metal storage containers from November 27, 2013 through January 15, 2014, and from October 31, 2014 through January 15, 2015, to be located southwest of the existing Wal-Mart store, for the storage of holiday merchandise at 79295 Highway 1 1 1 , more particularly described as follows: APN: 600-340-027 Parcel 1 of PM 30420 WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 is consistent with Specific Plan 97-029, as the proposed use of storage containers is temporary and accessory to a primary use approved and authorized under the existing Specific Plan; and, WHEREAS, per requirements of the La Quinta Municipal Code, notice of the hearing was posted at three public places (Stater Brothers Market, La Quinta Post Office, and La Quinta City Hall) along with the project site, said notice also having been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.020 of the Zoning Code to justify approval of said Conditional Use Permit: 1. Consistency with the General Plan: The proposed temporary use is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan in that the Planning Commission Resolution 2013 - Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 Walmart Adopted: November 26, 2013 Page: 2 property is designated Regional Commercial which is consistent with the temporary use proposed by this application. 2. Consistency with the Zoning Code: The proposed temporary use is consistent with the development standards outlined in Section 9.100.120 (Outdoor Storage and Display) of the Zoning Code because merchandise will be stored in enclosed metal containers which have been screened and placed away from traffic and pedestrians at the rear of the building. 3. Compliance with CEQA: The La Quinta Community Development Department has determined that this application is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to provisions of Section 15304[E] (Class 4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposal constitutes a minor temporary use of land having no permanent effect on the environment. 4. Surrounding Uses: Approval of the Conditional Use Permit will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or be injurious to, or incompatible with, other properties or land uses in the vicinity in that they are temporary and will be placed in areas away from customer and delivery traffic and public views. The adjacent properties are designated and zoned for commercial use within the Centre at La Quinta Shopping Center. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and correct, and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission for this Conditional Use Permit; SECTION 2. That it does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission held on this 261" day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Planning Commission Resolution 2013 - Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 Walmart Adopted: November 26, 2013 Page: 3 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: KATIE BARROWS, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: LES JOHNSON Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2013 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2013-154 TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. NOVEMBER 26, 2013 Page 1 of 1 GENERAL 1. The use of this site shall be in conformance with the approved exhibits contained in Conditional Use Permit 2013-154, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. This Conditional Use Permit allows a total of five (5) temporary metal storage containers to be located at the southwest corner of the property at 79295 Highway 1 1 1 , to be used for the storage of holiday merchandise for the following periods of time • November 27, 2013 through January 15, 2014 • October 31, 2014 through January 15, 2015 Conditional Use Permit 2013-154 shall expire on January 16, 2015. 3. The storage containers and screening enclosure shall be removed and the site shall be cleared of all materials and restored to its original condition no later than the end date of January 15 of each approval period. 4. All containers shall be kept at least 60 feet away from the building at all times. Any storage containers or materials which are placed within the 60 foot building clearance area or obstruct a fire access lane shall be relocated upon notice from the Fire Marshal or Code Compliance. 5. The outdoor storage area shall be maintained and kept clean of debris at all times. Graffiti or vandalism shall be removed or repaired within 48 hours of notice. 6. All materials stored within the containers shall be secured. 7. The applicant/property owner agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, or litigation arising out of the City's approval of this project. This indemnification shall include any award toward attorney's fees. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select its defense counsel in its sole discretion. ATTACHMENT 1 Project Information Sheet APPLICANT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPERTY OWNER: WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: THE LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15304[E] (CLASS 4) IN THAT THE STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TEMPORARY AND WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. ZONING: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USE: NORTH: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) SOUTH: RH (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) EAST: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) WEST: RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) SITE INFORMATION: 19.12 ACRES APN: 600-340-027 EXISTING RETAIL STORE AT 79295 HIGHWAY 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT 2 - Site Photos Above: Looking West 7A Above: Looking North Below: Looking SW ION SITE PLAN u r l 1 ^ r' tC,:Dt t®1 t... 1 t;;T-zDi t ZD4 t®r 1C 1 1 } ` 0— ;> o r. r d f�A o EXISTING WALMART BUILDING I I f AREA OF WORK RE: 2/A-1.0 (N 8' WIDC x 48' G x 8'-61 HIGH )R 0,GE TRA�LERS, TYPICAL] OF 5) 84'4" (N) 9' HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE WITH 24' WIDE GATE AND 9' HIGH PRIVACY SCREEN. APPROX. SIZE 47' WIDE x 52' LONG. RECEIVED OCT 2 4-2013 CITY OF LA QUINTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT WESTWARD HO DR IA QUINTA HIGH F u' 11.1 SCHOOL p PROJECT 11 SITE HWY 111 x Q { AVENUE AR ELSENHOWER DR I SM I SITE LOCATION MAP I A NOTE: PHOTOS INDICATE EXAMPLE OF PROPOSED TRAILERS WITH NO FENCING. FENCING WITH PRIVACY SCREENING TO BE ADDED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. NORTH 21 ENLARGED PLAN 11CALf'.:t-21' 3 1 PROPOSED STORAGE TRAILERS SCALE: NTB 89 O O In OMm�'s W W } O IPA owe 3 Ln Ham= �ZNm Q.J^a �3 g D 3 � fir ti/ m D NA" N0 RYLAN EETS