Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PP 1991-456 (2)
4 CITY OF'LA QUINTA PLANNING i DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 RESIDENTIAL and PLOT PrR i 5 1991 Case No.: Date Received- r, OMMERCIAL FEE . :Z3 PLAN APPLICATION In order to process your application in a timely manner, please complete and sign this form. The information which is required to be shown on the plans and submitted with the application is stated on the back of this form. Failure to provide the required information is justification for rejection of the application. , THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A NON- REFUNDABLE FILING FEE OF $ AND COPIES OF THE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE PLOT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. Name of Applicant THE KOENIG COMPANIES Phone 213) 534 -8060 Mailing Address 2601 Airport Drive Torrance, CA 90505 Street City Zip Code Legal Owner Address Proposed Use —C. P COMMERCIAL The net and gross square footage for each proposed use and building. RETAIL COMMERCIAL - 120,000 S.F. The square footage allocated for sidewalks /walkways, parking, landscappingg and building. ,g�ir3awalks + 26.000 S.F. LDS_CP INCL. RET. BASIN = 80,000 _ PARKING, DRIVEWAYS, LOADING 277,000 Location.of Property (Address if known) 1 5i8 �144 02 —ii5i 835A0 i TUTAL 3 t QDRIuR 769-030-0078 balance of property Assessor's Parcel Number 769 -030 -0 9 769-4)3Q=033=1 Legal Description of Property (give exact legal description as recorded.'• in the office of the County Recorder) -- (may be attached) 0TV U- ALA quINTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT signature of App Signature of Own VG,vA77aeE of Date Date Z i i� 4. 9.id2.030 Applications. Resi,. ntial and commercial plot plan applications shall be submitted to the planning and development department and provide the following in- formation and exhibits: A. Complete application form; 0 B. One copy of the preliminary title report or deed of trust to the subject property; Sets of the site development plans (number as re- quired by the planning and development department) , each set to incorporate the following: O 1. Dimensioned floor plan(s) relating to all build- ing layout aspects, showing applicable sales /display, office area, bedrooms, kitchens, hallways, bath /restrooms, etc., for the particular use under review, O 2. Four -point elevations of any and all buildings proposed on the site, delineating any outstanding architec- tural feature(s), relationships to any existing structures and /or other adjacent properties, and listing proposed, building materials, finishes, colors, etc., O 3. A detailed site plan delineating all siting aspects of the development (i.e., setbacks, topography, fencing locaitons, locations provided for ground- mounted mechanical and heating /air conditioning systems, parking, accessways, adjacent streets, utilities, drainage, and any proposed signage. 9 Note: In some instances, a preliminary grading plan may be required if it is determined to be necessary due to topographic considerations and other related site factors. O 4. A complete site landscaping plan, showing a listing of quantities, species, location and plant sizes to be incorporated into the final landscaping of the project. _ The _final approved landscape plan must be stamped "approved" by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office O prior to the issuance of a building permit. D. Two sets of all plans reduced to eight-and one -half inches by eleven inches, and submitted on acetate or other similar format suitable for presentation. O E. One eight -inch by thirteen -inch color, material and finish sample board for the building's exterior areas, in- cluding, but not limited to, roof covering, facia boards, tile inlays, stucco finish, wood or other plant -on mater- ials, etc. Colors and materials shall be keyed on at least O one set of architectural elevations. F. One colored elevation of all sides of the build - ings, oriented to public view, in accordance with the mater- ials sample board submitted. A colored swatch (band of color on the drawings) may be substituted for a complete colored drawing. O G. If the application requires a public hearing: A list of the names and addresses of all owners of real property located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property to be considered, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any update issued by the City Assessor. The list must be certified by a title company, architect, engineer, or surveyor. �\ J \ �, � ,� 1 " Case Number Fate Received PLANNING i DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A. The following shall be submitted by the Applicant to the Planning i Development Department at the time of permit application unless otherwise modified by the Planning Director: I. Completed sign application obtained from the City. 2. Appropriate sign plans with number of copies and exhibits as required in the application. 63 3. Appropriate fees as established by Council resolution. t$O ;P_ 4. Letter of consent or authorization from property owner, or lessor, or authorized. agent of the building or premises upon which the sign is to be erected. B. Plans Required - Information required - the following information must be shown on the sign plan: I. Sign elevation drawing indicating overall and letter /figure /design dimensions, colors, materials, proposed copy and illumination method. 2. Site plan indicating the location of all main and accessory signs existing or proposed for the site with dimensions, color, material, copy and method of illumination indicated for each. 3: Building elevations with signs depicted (for non - freestanding signs). Applicant Mailing Address Phone: ( ) Name of Business Type of Business. Phone: ( ) Address of Business i J ar Sign Company Name Address Phone: ) Sign Company Representative Type of Signs Proposed: Number Free Standing Wall Mounted Temporary Number Main Trade Sign Directional Sign Offsite Advertising Location of Proposed Signs Assessor's Parcel Number Zone `Overall dimensions of sign (and of copy face if less) Materials Colors Type of Illumination Declared Value or Contract Price Signature of Applicant- Date Signature of Property Ow.ner(s)* Date Date *(Written Authority May be Attached) NOTE: Any false or misleading information shall be grounds for denial of this application. Cnn.r nn� !nn - ,�4 � y„ 1 FMWW,-, & - TO: Ofru of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County CIA County of Riverside P. 0. Box 431 Riverside, CA 92502 Appenclix H Frorn: (Public Agency) CITY OF 1A QUINTA P. O. Box 1504 I a Quinta, CA 92253 ant �0 tc.. Subjece Filing of Notice of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. General Plan Amendment 91 -035, Change of Zone 91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456, (EA 91 -187) Project Title The Koenig Companies n/a State Clearinghouse Number mead Agency Area Code/Telephone xtension (If submiaed to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Northwest corner of Washington Street &. Calle Tampico Project Location (include county) Project Description: Construction of a shopping center consisting of 116,600± square feet of floor area. 71>is is to advise that the City of La Quinta Acts approved the above described project on tea A&ax7 p Req=Vc A4a%7 April 16, 1991 and has made the fotlowing determinations regarding the above described project (Dm) 1. The project C)wW Owill not] have a significant effect on the environmenL 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Repon was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. JU A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measUM3 [$3wose []were not) trade a condition of the approval of the project 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [[)was E3was noel adopted for this projecL S. Findings (Owe-re Qwere not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: City of La Quinta, 78 -105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, CA 92253 (Public Agency) Date received for filing at OPR: -zR Al Principal Planner Date rrle Revised October 1989 6 ATTENTION: i �.. P.O. Box 1504 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 619 -564 -2246 619 - 564 -5617 (FAX) For your information and records. Copies as requested. Receipt. Date: �a�IQ( / Other Ghee -P,- 1 ' 1a:-75 C> f I , '15n -4 r 31545 fV If you have any questions on the above please contact the undersigned. AM, OAXW'o WA I t R A A BJ/FORM.014 Twy/ of 04 G/uu�rw ATTENTION: i �.. P.O. Box 1504 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 619 -564 -2246 619 - 564 -5617 (FAX) For your information and records. Copies as requested. Receipt. Date: �a�IQ( / Other Ghee -P,- 1 ' 1a:-75 C> f I , '15n -4 r 31545 fV If you have any questions on the above please contact the undersigned. AM, OAXW'o WA I t R A A BJ/FORM.014 THE KOENIG COMPANIES 2468 2801 AIRPORT DR., NO. 240 213 - 534 -8080 TORRANCE, CA 80505 18.49M220 APRIL 23, 1991 LFOR Co� NTY OF RIVERSIDE- - - - Ay -1 F g1,275�00 - - - - - - - ONE - THOUSAND _ aV0- F�UN_DUD- c�F��F,u r�y—r =VE -A�,}B _kT ^�i-'I CQ � _ DOLLAR S U�io n Bank I- l. bo- � 9w mi. suoel Lm s, CA vos is IMCE �AiLON_i 11'00 2468(1' 1:1220004961:100 &ov 1 311' y STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESG ES AGENCY > - DEPARTMENT OF FISH AN2i - ;AME N °_ 5433 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT APPLICATION /FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT Lead Agency: _ ( � County/State Agency: _ Project Title: -0P�q Q Project Applicant: Date: 'f—? p/ Document No. 000 ) 00 CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: JUL 5 (9 Q ( ) Environmental Impact Report vl f y ,ur �� : „�s,��po to CANNING 06 $ p Negative Declaration & D a S0 ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (water Resources Control Board On YD�T. $ ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (DFG & CDF Only) $850.00 $ Do4t County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ �S / ( ) Project that requires fee, not paid (enter amount due) $ ( ) Project that is exempt from fees TOTAL RECEIVED $ Signature of person receiving payment (- �Qf FIRST COPY - PROJECTAPPLICANT SECOND COPY - DFG /CEAB THIRD COPY -LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY - COUNTY "_ -4- Notice of ®eterminatfwh llppencox H To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) CITY OF LA QURM 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 P. 0. Box 1504 Sacramento, CA 95814 La Quinta, CA 92253 �/ _ County Clerk County of Riverside R F C S I'V E U L P. 0. Box 431 Riverside, CA 92 502 JUL Subject. � ANNING & DEVEL4pM[ IT DEPT. Filing of Notice of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. G^neral Plan Amendment-91-035, Change of Zone 91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456, (EA 91 -187) Project Title The Koenig Companies n/a State Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency Area Coden'elephone/Eztension (If submiued to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Northwest corner of Washington Street & Calle Tampico Project Location (include county) Project Description: Construction of a shopping center consisting of 116,600± square feet of floor area. 7his is to advise that the City of La Quin to has appmved the above described project on O t.aa kawy [3 RcVmd�k Mawy April 16, 1991 and has made the following determinations regarding the above descnbed project (Daw) 1. The project (Qwill OvviD not) have a signitrcartt effect an the erv�_mna�t. 2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. �A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were Qwem tat] made tt condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations UDwas E3was tat] adopted for this projecL 3. Findings towere Qwere not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final EUt with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: City of La Quinta, 78 -105 Calle Estado, La Ouinta, CA 92253 60tDRiTY C�latt . mlr our�Tir c�.E � OQ Qw� _ �� 4 � � ��� 4 .A1 RgrrP.n.CPt: m--i pal Planner Signawt (Public Agency) Date received for filing at OPR: Trite MAY - 3 1991 r.' I , —11991 WILLIAM E: CONERLY COUNTY CLERK By: � County of Riventide, State of Caf;fomla County of RyvsrA, S of Cdbmi& Revised Ocrobeu 1989 fay ti Q AA3JJ VT;4UO%"OI qat Sal I offvq- -- -14 r C, P.O. Box 1504 Jill 1 19Q1 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 �A I y ur LM vuINTA 619-564-2246 'I -ANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 619 - 564 -5617 (FAX) Date: Aa 1 Q TO: Goc o$ e i y'erOc AP, 45 j �i� tet� Le � Ila Q� ATTENTION: ��p�,yf} -�j►/� ��r'�. PROJECT:1% (d'OV1 MPiln :�YY��'b q'i g� For your information and records. Copies as requested. Receipt. / other C��1�!��'li -Po r ! Dw6a 315 If you have any questions on the above please contact the undersigned. BJ/FORM.014 'A. `wild. C _ 4 y _ r 1�, OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: JULY 21, 1992 AGENDA CATEGORY: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY IN PROJECT AREA NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE RELATING THERETO. (LA QUINTA VILLAGE PROJECT - DEVELOPER: KOENIG COMPANIES). BACKGROUND: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Attached is the necessary resolution for the approval of a ground lease with Koenig Companies - Ralph's Commercial Center. Also attached is the staff report outlining the projects important points. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Under terms of thelease the Agency would lease this site for a five -year term, with annual lease payments equaling $115,000; the total financial commitment under the terms of the lease is $474,000. APPROVED BY: �✓ RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency consider and approve the resolution that authorizes the Chairman and Executive Director to execute all documents, and take all other actions necessary to implement the ground lease. Submitted by: Signature Approved for submission to Chairman and members of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency: R G, iNC . II!' 7 14- 3 6 - 17 4 lJL 15';a_, i4 :50 No .015 P .04 v DATE: July 21, 1992 Alin Fax and Federal Express TO: Murray Wardim Interim Executive Director Thomas P. Genovese, Assistant Executive Director LA QUINI'A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: Drank J. Spevacek, RSQ- *" SUBJECT: GROUND LEASE WITH KOENIG COMPANIES - RALPH'S COMMERCIAL CENTER BACKGROUND At their July 21st meeting, the Agency will be considering a ground lease with the John W. Koenig Companies, a California corporation Clxssor "). The purpose of the ground lease is to have the Agency lease, for a five -year period, approximately 10,000 square feet of property to be used for a public park; th s will facilitate a 75 percent prelease commitment for the Ralph's CommercTat Center to he located at the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. DISCUSSION At their AprH 21st meeting, the Agency reviewed a proposal from the Lessor pertaining to a prop. osed ground lease with the Agency for the Ralph�s Commercial Center. The Lessor is to the final stages of project design and seeking prelease commitments that will lead to the construction of the Center: The Lessor is proposing to build a 116,459 square foot retail commercial center that features a Ralph's supermarket; 29,425 square feet of shop Space; 22,000 square feet of pad buildings; and a 19,300 square foot drug store. The Lessor had preleased the drug store'space; however, with the development of a Pharmor pharrlacv at TDC's Highway 111 project, the potential drug store operator withdrew their eonunitment. The Lessor has been unable to secure other dru$ store operators at this location, given the new Pharmor store combined with the existing Thritlty's drug store located at the Von's Highwav 1.11 center. Given the current financing market, the I e-ssor must achieve 75 percent prelease commitment before his lenders will provide construction and permanent financing commitments. The Lessor has been successful in leasin T a majority of the shop and pad space, but without a drug store operator, they can=not ac sieve the '75 percent prelease m comitment. The users for the shop and pad space include a pizza establishment, a 6,000 square foot dinner house, a Mexictan restaurant, a video store, a cleaning establishment, a hair salon, and the Ralph's grocery store. S,Wl N-6 0,71P, SAMA An,t, CA 92705 -3914, TaItpltune 114/541.1SS5, Fax 714r8!�6 -1748, S.ut Dieu Uly /yEt' /.hl(� I1'4 C . I � : 7 1 .4 - I ?36- 1'4,:' 11,JL 15' " -' 14 : 51 fro Murray Warden Thomas P. Genovese July 21, 1992 Page 2 The ground lease provides that the Agency will lease an approximates , 10,000 square fc -ol site adjacent to the Ralph's rocery store. This site will be improved by the Lessor) with grass lawn planting and out oor furniture; it will be :available for use as a passive public park for the community. Under the terms of the lease, the Aggen.c. would lease this site for a five -year term, with annual lease payments equaling $115,0 0; the total financial commitment under the terms of the lease is $575,000. Lease payments would be made monthly and would commence upon the completion: and opening of the Ralph's grocery store. Under the terms of the ground lease, both the Agency and the Lessor would have the opportunity to sublease the premises to an acceptable commercial user (a new drug store operator, for example) (luring the term of the ground lease. Maintenance of the site improvements would be the responsibility of the Lessor. It has been the Agency's desire to seek the developmentt of commercial uses in or adjacent to the Village of La (�Jnta. Ralph's commercial center would ,achieve this goal by not only providing a convenient grocery store use, but also restaurant and service commercial Uses. Given the tenant mix proposed for the Ralph's commercial center, residents in the vicinity of the Ralph's commercial center will enjoy shopping, dining, and personal service enterprises. We have also reviewer] the projected sales and property tax revenue from this center. Over a ten -year period, the center would generate a projected $1,081,393 in property tax increment revenue and a projected $1,995,15$ in saes tax revenue. RECOMM NDATI N That the Agency consider and approve the resolution that authorizes the Chairman and Executive Director to execute all documents, and take all other actions necessary to implement the ground lease. \1Qryu1nialgrnd4 r � RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY IN PROJECT AREA NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "Agency ") under the provision of the California Community Redevelopment Law, is engaged in activities necessary for the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Area "); and WHEREAS, The John W. corporation (hereinafter Agency desire to enter a disposition of a certain "Property" for uses in a, and Koenig Companies, a California referred to as "Koenig ") and the lease (the "Lease ") regarding the parcel described herein as the :cordance with the Redevelopment Plan; WHEREAS, in order to effectuate the provisions of that Redevelopment Plan, the Agency proposes to lease the Property from Koenig pursuant to the Lease; and WHEREAS, Koenig and the Agency have mutually prepared the Lease which contains all the provisions, terms and conditions and includes all obligations required by State and local law; WHEREAS, a public hearing has been duly noticed and held on the Lease; and WHEREAS, the Agency has duly considered all terms and conditions of the Lease and believes that the use of the Property for a public mini -park for the use of the citizens of La Quinta, all as more particularly set forth, in the Lease, is in the best interests of the City of La Quinta and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents,and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared a staff report pertaining to the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the approval of the Lease and implementation of the Lease terms may have a significant effect on the environment and that such action is in furtherance of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Therefore, the activity is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and a notice of exemption from the provisions of CEQA shall be filed by staff with the County Clerk of the County of Riverside. Section 2. The Agency has received and considered the staff report on the Lease of the Property and, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearing, the Agency finds and determines that: (i) the Lease will assure development of certain commercial uses within the Project Area providing goods and services to the community, tax increment to the Agency, and sales tax to the City of La Quinta; and (ii) the lease of the property from Koenig to the Agency is justified under the provision of the Community Redevelopment Law. Section 3. The lease of the Property by Koenig to the Agency as described in the Lease is hereby approved. Section 4. The Chairman and the Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute all documents and take all other actions necessary to implement the Lease. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1992. Chairman ATTEST: Agency Secretary 07/14/92 1986q/2338/027 -2- day of GROUND LEASE by and between THE JOHN W. KOENIG COMPANIES, a California corporation "LESSOR" and LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, "LESSEE" dated as of , 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. SUBJECT AND TERM 1.1 Purpose of Lease 1.2 Premises 1.3 Exceptions to Leasehold Estate 1.4 Term of Lease 1.5 Date of Lease and Legal Effect ARTICLE II. RENT 2.1 Rent 2.2 Place of Payment; Late Payments ARTICLE III. IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AND USE 3.1 Improvements Provided by Lessor 3.2 Use of Premises ARTICLE IV. LESSOR'S PAYMENT OF EXPENSES ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES AND SITE 5.1 Lessor's Obligations for Maintenance ARTICLE VI. INDEMNITY 6.1 Covenant to Indemnify and Hold Harmless 6.2 Waiver of Subrogation ARTICLE VII. UTILITY CHARGES 7.1 Utility Charges ARTICLE VIII. DEFAULT 8.1 Events of Default 8.2 Legal Expenses and Collection Costs ARTICLE IX. HOLDING OVER 9.1 Holding Over (i) ARTICLE X. QUIET ENJOYMENT 10.1 Quiet Enjoyment ARTICLE XI. FORCE MAJEURE 11.1 Force Majeure ARTICLE XII. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Waiver 12.2 Notices 12.3 Relationship of Parties 12.4 Effect of Invalidity 12.5 Successors and Assigns 12.6 Entire Agreement 12.7 Corporate Authority 12.8 Controlling Law 12.9 Survival of Indemnities and Warranties 12.10 Non - Discrimination ARTICLE-XIII. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE 13.1 New Lease 13.2 Procedure 13.3 Criteria 13.4 New Lease /Option to Extend 13.5 Arbitration EXHIBIT A - Legal Description of Premises EXHIBIT B - Site Map for Ralphs Center (ii) GROUND LEASE ARTICLE I. SUBJECT AND TERM This GROUND LEASE (the "Lease ") is made on , 1992 by and between The John W. Koenig Companies, a California corporation, (the "Lessor ") and the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, a public body, corporate and politic (the "Lessee "). 1.1 Purpose of the Lease. The purpose of this Lease is to effectuate the redevelopment plan ( "Redevelopment Plan ") for the La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") in the City of La Quinta (the "City "), which was approved and adopted on November 29,1983 by the City Council of the City of La Quinta by Ordinance No. 83 -43. This Lease enables the development of the "Site ", (as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) within the Redevelopment Project Area as a commercial center including a Ralphs grocery store and adjacent commercial uses. The purpose for the Lease of the Premises (as defined herein) by the Agency is solely to enable the specific development of the Site. 1.2 Premises. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from Agency, that certain real property indicated on Exhibit B attached hereto ( "Premises "). 1.3 Exceptions to Leasehold Estate. This Lease is made subject to all covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, rights -of -way, easements and all other matters of record or apparent affecting the Premises or the use thereof of record on the date this Lease is executed by Lessee. 1.4 Term of Lease. The term ( "Term ") of this Lease shall be for a period of five (5) years from the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for and the commencement of operation of the Ralphs grocery store located adjacent to the Premises as shown on the Site Map (Exhibit "A "). 1.5 Date of Lease and Legal Effect. The terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease shall become legally binding on the date of execution of this Agreement. ARTICLE II. RENT 2.1 Rent. Lessee shall pay to Lessor for each full calendar year from and after the commencement and continuation of operations of the Ralphs grocery market located adjacent to the Premises as indicated on Exhibit A (the "Site Map for Ralphs Center ") attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and the Completion of the Improvements (defined in Section 3.1) One Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($115,000), such amount to be payable in equal monthly installments of Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighty -Three and 33/100 Dollars ($9,583.33) on the first (1st) day of every month during the Term. 2.2 Place of Payment; Late Payments. Lessee agrees to pay the rental and other charges herein reserved to Lessor at: 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240, Torrance, CA 90505 or to such other person and /or at such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate in writing. All payments shall be made in lawful money of the United States. All payments requiring proration shall be prorated on the basis of a twelve (12) month year and thirty (30) day month. ARTICLE III. IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AND USE 3.1 Improvements Provided by Lessor. Lessor shall improve the Premises with a grass lawn planting and shall provide outdoor furniture suitable for a public passive park use and acceptable to Lessee (the "Improvements "). 3.2 Use of Premises. After completion of the Improvements specified above, the Premises shall be available and open to the public as a mini -park and for no other purposes. ARTICLE IV. LESSOR'S PAYMENT OF EXPENSES Included Expenses. Lessor shall pay all of the costs and expenses (the "Operating Expenses ") in the operation, management, repair and maintenance of the Premises as well as the entire Site during the Term, regardless of whether said expenses or charges are incurred by Lessor or by Lessee directly in the maintenance of the Premises or paid by Lessor to outside contractors. Such expenses shall include, without limitation, the following: (i) property taxes applicable to the Premises, (ii) expenses incurred by Lessor or Lessee in connection with the Premises for general maintenance, gardening, landscaping, repaving, resurfacing, repairs, replacements, painting, lighting, cleaning, trash removal, security, fire protection and similar items whether or not capital in nature and the actual cost of any repair or replacement; (iii) all charges, surcharges and other levies imposed by, and all costs (whether or not capital in nature) of compliance with the requirements of any federal, state or local governmental agency regulating the Premises. 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -2- ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE OF PREMISES AND SITE (a) Lessor's Items. Lessor, at Lessor's expense, shall keep and maintain in first class appearance and in good order, condition and repair as determined by Agency the Premises and the Site and every part thereof and any and all appurtenances thereto wherever located and all other repairs, replacements, renewals and restorations, ordinary and extraordinary, foreseen and unforeseen. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may elect, in its sole discretion, to maintain and repair the Premises and the landscaping located on the Premises and the costs therefor shall be deducted by Lessee from the rent due to Lessor, provided that Lessee shall give Lessor ten (10) days' prior written notice before any such entry onto the Site. Lessor, at Lessor's expense, shall store and cause weekly removal of all trash, garbage and other solid waste on or within the Premises. (b) Standard of Maintenance. Lessor shall keep and maintain the Premises and the Site in a clean, sanitary and safe condition in accordance with the laws of the State of California and in accordance with all directions, rules and regulations of the health officer, fire marshall, building inspector or other proper officials of the governmental agencies having jurisdiction, and Lessor shall comply with all requirements of laws, ordinances and otherwise affecting the Premises and the Improvements, all at the sole cost and expense of Lessor. ARTICLE VI. INDEMNITY 6.1 Covenant to Indemnify and Hold Harmless. Lessor covenants to defend and indemnify Lessee, the City and their respective officers, representatives, agents and employees and save them harmless from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expenses, including attorneys' fees, in connection with the loss of life, bodily injury and /or damage to property arising from or out of any occurrence in, upon or at the Premises or the Site, or the occupancy or use by Lessor of the Premises or any part thereof, or arising from or out of Lessor's failure to comply with any provision of this Lease or otherwise occasioned wholly or in part by any act or omission of Lessor, its agents, directors, stockholders, representatives, contractors, employees, servants, customers or licensees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessor shall not be obligated to indemnify Lessee, the City and their respective officers, representatives, agents and employees with respect tc claims arising from the acts or omissions of Lessee, unless such acts or omissions were caused by or contributed to by Lessor or its agents, directors, stockholders, representatives, 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -3- agents and employees. The terms and provisions of this Section 6.1 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease. 6.2 Waiver of Subrogation. Each party hereto does hereby waive, remise, release and discharge the other party hereto and any officer, director, shareholder, beneficiary, partner, agent, employee or representative of such other party, of and from any liability whatsoever hereafter arising from loss or damage for which property insurance (fire and allied perils) containing a waiver of subrogation is carried by the injured party under such insurance. ARTICLE VII. UTILITY CHARGES 7.1 Utility Charoes. Lessor shall pay all charges for gas, water, sewer, electricity, telephone and other utility services used on or in the Premises and /or the Improvements during the Term. If any such charges are not paid when due, Lessee may pay the same, and any amount so paid by Lessee shall become deducted by Lessee from the rent. ARTICLE VIII. DEFAULT 8.1 Events of Default. The word "default," as used in this Section 8, shall mean and include any one or more of the following events or occurrences: (a) The failure by Lessee to make any payment of rent, additional rent or other payment required to be made by Lessee hereunder, within ten (10) days after the date due. (b) The failure of Lessee or Lessor to perform any term, condition, covenant or agreement of this Lease, excluding the payment of rent and additional rent, and the continuation of such failure for a period of ten (10) days after written notice specifying the same, or in the case of a situation in which the default cannot reasonably be cured within ten (10) days, if Lessee or Lessor shall not promptly, within ten (10) days after receipt of such notice, commence to remedy the situation by a means that can reasonably be expected to remedy the situation within a reasonable period of time and diligently pursue the same to completion within sixty (60) days after the date of giving of such notice; (c) The abandonment by Lessee of the Premises by giving written notice to Lessor that it no longer desires to lease the Premises; (d) The discontinuation of an active grocery store use in the Site for a continuous period of six (6) months or 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -4- more for any reason other than (i) strikes, lockouts or other labor difficulties, fire or other casulaty, condemnation, war, riot, insurrection, act of God, the requirements of any local, state or federal law, rule or regulation or any other reason (except financial) beyond the reasonable control of Lessor or said grocery store, or (ii) temporary closure (not to exceed nine (9) months in the aggregate) due to restoration, reconstruction, expansion, alteration or remodeling of the grocery store. The provisions of Section 11.1 below shall not be applicable with respect to this Section 8.1. 8.2 Legal Expenses and Collection Costs. If either party incurs any expense, including actual costs of collection, reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses of discovery, preparation for litigation, expert witness fees and litigation expenses and costs, in connection with any action or proceeding instituted by either party by reason of any default or alleged default of the other party hereunder, the party prevailing in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable expenses from the other party. ARTICLE IX. HOLDING OVER 9.1 Holding Over. This Lease shall terminate and become null and void without further notice upon the expiration of the Term herein specified, and any holding over by Lessee after such expiration shall not constitute a renewal or extension hereof or give Lessee any rights under this Lease, except when in writing signed by both parties hereto. ARTICLE X. QUIET ENJOYMENT 10.1 Ouiet Enjoyment. Upon payment by Lessee of the rents provided herein, and upon the observance and performance of all of the covenants, terms and conditions on the part of Lessee to be performed hereunder, Lessor covenants and warrants that Lessee may peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the Premises for the Term. ARTICLE XI. FORCE MAJEURE 11.1 Force Majeure. In the event the performance by either party of any of its obligations hereunder is delayed by reason of the act or neglect of the other party, act of God, stormy or inclement weather, strike, labor dispute, boycott, lockout or other like defensive action by such party, inability to obtain labor or materials, governmental restrictions, riot, insurrection, war, catastrophe, casualty, act of the public enemy, or any other cause, whether similar or dissimilar, beyond the reasonable control of the party from whom such 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -5- performance is due, the period for the commencement or completion thereof shall be extended for a period equal to the period during which performance is so delayed. ARTICLE XII. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Waiver. The waiver by either Lessor or Lessee of any breach of any term, condition or covenant contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, condition or covenant on any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, condition or covenant contained herein. 12.2 Notices. All notices, demands or other writings to be made, given or sent hereunder, or which may be so given or made or sent by either Lessor or Lessee to the other shall be deemed to have been given when in writing and personally delivered or if mailed on the third (3rd) day after deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, and addressed to the respective parties at their addresses set forth below: _ 12.3 Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture between the parties hereto, it being understood and agreed that neither the method of computation of rent, nor any other provision contained herein, nor any acts of the parties herein, shall be deemed to create any relationship between the parties hereto other than the relationship of Lessor and Lessee. 12.4 Effect of Invalidity. If any term or provision of this Lease or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Lease shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. No acquisition by Lessor of all or any of the interest of Lessee in or to the Premises or the Improvements, and no acquisition by Lessee of all or any interest of Lessor in or to the Premises shall constitute or work a merger of the respective interest, unless expressly provided for. 12.5 Successors and Assigns. This Lease and the covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding and inure to the benefit of and shall apply to the successors and assigns of Lessor and to the permitted successors and assigns of Lessee, and all references in this Lease to "Lessee" or 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -6- "Lessor" shall be deemed to refer to an include all permitted successors and assigns of such party. 12.6 Entire Agreement. This Lease and the exhibits hereto contain the entire agreement of Lessor and Lessee with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no other agreement, statement of promise made by either Lessor or Lessee, which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No prior agreement, understanding or representation pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Lease may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by Lessor and Lessee. 12.7 Corporate Authority. Each individual executing this Lease on behalf of a corporation represents and warrants that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of the corporation, and that this Lease is binding upon the corporation in accordance with its terms. Lessor shall, at Lessee's request, deliver a certified copy of its board of directors' resolution or certificate authorizing or evidencing such execution. 12.8 Controlling Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 12.9 Survival of Indemnities and Warranties. The obligations of the indemnifying party under each and every indemnification and hold harmless provision contained in this Lease shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease to and until the last to occur of (a) the last date permitted by law for the bringing of any claim or action with respect to which indemnification may be claimed by the indemnified party against the indemnifying party under such provision or (b) the date on which any claim or action for which indemnification may be claimed under such provision is fully and finally resolved, and, if applicable, any compromise thereof or judgment or award thereon is paid in full by the indemnifying party and the indemnified party is reimbursed by the indemnifying party for any amounts paid by the indemnified party in compromise thereof or upon judgment or award thereon and in defense of such action or claim, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred. The representations, warranties, and covenants of the parties contained herein shall survive the termination of this Lease without regard to any investigation made by the parties. 12.10 Non - Discrimination. The Lessor, as to the Site, and the Lessee, as to the Premises, covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, its assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or the Premises, as the case may be, or any part thereof, that during the Term, each of the Lessor and Lessee, such successors and such assignees, shall devote the 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -7- Site and the Premises to the uses specified in the Redevelopment Plan and this Agreement for the periods of time specified therein. The foregoing covenant shall run with the land. The Lessee, as to the Premises, and the Lessor, as to the Site, covenants by and for itself and any successors in interest that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site or the Premises, nor shall either party itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Premises or the Site. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. The Lessee and Lessor shall refrain from restricting the use, rental, sale or lease of the Premises and of the Site on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry of any person. All such deeds, leases or contracts shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: 1. In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or herself or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." 2. In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him or her, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -8- age, ancestry or national origin in the leasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee himself or herself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants or vendees in the premises herein leased." 3. In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person, or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, ancestry or national origin, in the sale, lease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the premises, nor shall the transferee himself or herself or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, or vendees of the premises." ARTICLE XIII. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE 13.1 New Lease. During the Term, Lessee shall have the right to assign the Lease to a third party provided that such third party meets the criteria set forth in Section 13.3, below, ( "New Lessee ") and concurrently therewith, Lessor agrees, at New Lessee's request, to enter into a new lease ( "New Lease ") for an additi -onal ten (10) -year term with two (2) five (5) -year options to extend the term as provided in Section 13.4, below and Lessee shall have no liability thereunder or pursuant to this Lease from and after the effective date of the New Lease. In the event Lessor refuses to enter into such New Lease with the New Lessee, and the New Lessee meets all of the criteria set forth in Section 13.3, below, then at Lessee's option the Lease shall be deemed terminated and Lessee shall be released from any and all liability hereunder from and after the date of Lessor's notice of such refusal. Lessee shall have the right to retain any and all consideration arising out of the assignment of the Lease. Lessor shall have the right to all consideration payable by New Lessee under the New Lease. 13.2 Procedure. In the event Lessee procures a New Lessee, it shall notify Lessor in writing of same setting forth in such notice the following: (i) the identity of the New Lessee; (ii) the proposed use of the Premises by the New Lessee; (iii) the number of stores operated by the New Lessee and the business experience of the New Lessee and (iv) the proposed rental and other economic consideration to be paid by the New Lessee to Lessor under the New Lease. Such notice shall also be accompanied by a form of the proposed New Lease. Within fifteen (15) days after service of Lessee's notice, 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -9- Lessor shall either (i) agree in writing to Lessee to accept the New Lessee upon the economic terms and provisions set forth in Lessee's notice, or (ii) refuse in writing to Lessee to accept such New Lessee, stating the reasonable reasons therefor. In the event Lessor agrees to accept the New Lessee, Lessor and New Lessee shall enter into good faith negotiations concerning any issues arising from the proposed New Lease (provided that the economic terms set forth in Lessee's notice shall not be subject to negotiation) for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of Lessor's notice accepting the New Lessee. If, at the expiration of such thirty (30) -day period the parties have been unable to agree on the final form of the proposed New Lease, then any remaining issues shall be submitted to arbitration in accordance with Section 13.5 below. In the event Lessor refuses in writing to accept the New Lessee or Lessor fails to notify Lessee of its decision within such fifteen (15) -day period, then this Lease shall be deemed terminated at the expiration of such fifteen (15) -day period. 13.3 Criteria. The proposed New Lessee shall meet all of the following criteria: 1) minimum net worth of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 2) intends to operate a use which (i) does not violate (as of the date of the assignment) any exclusive rights granted to another tenant in the Site or (ii) does not conflict with the primary use of any other tenant existing on the Site as of the date of the assignment of the Lease, (iii) is compatible with the tenant mix at the Site as of the date of the assignment of the Lease, and (iv) is a retail use commonly found in other like shopping centers in Southern California; 3) operates a minimum of five (5) stores under the same trade name and style as the New Lessee will operate at the Premises; 4) has a minimum of ten (10) years of experience operating the type of retail use the New Lessee will operate at the Premises; 5) will operate the store consisting of at least ten thousand (10,000) square feet of retail space at the Premises; and 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -10- 6) the rent to be paid by the New Lessee is not less than the rent payable by Lessee pursuant to Section 2.1. 13.4 New Lease /Option to Extend. In addition to the foregoing, Lessor shall grant to the New Lessee, as part of the New Lease, and the New Lease shall contain, one (1) ten (10) -year term and two (2) five (5) -year options to extend the Term of the New Lease (each such five (5) -year period being called herein an "Option Period "). The rent to be paid by the New Lessee at the commencement of the New Lease and during each such Option Period shall be mutually determined by Lessor and New Lessee at the commencement of the term of the New Lease and of each Option Period, but shall in no event be greater than the lesser of (i) the increase in the Index (as such term is defined below) using as the base month the month three (3) months prior to the first day of the term (with respect to the initial ten (10) -year term of the New Lease) and the first day of the term of the New Lease (with respect to the first Option Period) and the first day of the first Option Period (with respect to the second Option Period) ( "Base Month ") and using as the comparison month the month three (3) months prior to the commencement of the term of the New Lease or the applicable Option Period, as the case may be ( "Comparison Month "), and (ii) one hundred twenty percent (120 %) of the rent payable during the Term (with respect to the initial term of the New Lease) or the initial term of the New Lease (with respect to the first Option Period), or the first Option Period (with respect to the second Option Period). As used herein, the term "Index" shall mean the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage earners and Clerical Workers, Los Angeles- Anaheim - Riverside Average, Subgroup "All Items" (1982 -1984 = 100). If at any time there shall not exist the Index in the form recited herein, the parties shall substitute any official index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or successor or similar governmental agency as may then be in existence and shall be most nearly equivalent thereto. If the parties are unable to agree on the substitute Index, then the matter shall be submitted to arbitration in accordance with Section 13.5, below. 13.5 Arbitration. In the event the parties are unable to agree on the New Lease, as provided in Section 13.2, or the substitute Index, as provided in Section 13.4, then such matters shall be submitted to arbitration in accordance with the following: Either party may cause the matter to be submitted for resolution by binding arbitration in accordance with the rules and procedures (except those pertaining to selection of 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -11- arbitrators) of the American Arbitration Association applicable to such matters. In the event that either party elects to cause a matter to be submitted for binding arbitration, Landlord and Tenant shall promptly cause to be prepared and jointly execute a submittal letter setting forth the specific issue or issues to be determined by the arbitrator and clearly defining the scope of the arbitrator's responsibility in the arbitration. If Landlord and Tenant are unable to agree on such submittal letter than either or both parties may submit their own submittal letter. Within ten (10) days after the joint execution of the submittal letter, or the submission by either party of their own submittal letter, as the case may be, the parties shall select an arbitrator. Any arbitrator selected hereunder shall be qualified in shopping center management, hold a CSM or CPM certificate, have at least five (5) years' experience operating, leasing and managing retail shopping centers in the geographic area in which the Shopping Center is located, and have the degree of knowledge and expertise in the area necessary to qualify as an expert witness over objection to give opinion testimony addressed to the issue in a court of competent jurisdiction. If the parties are unable to agree upon an arbitrator within ten (10) days after the joint execution of the submittal letter, either party may apply to the then presiding judge of the Superior Court in and for the State of California, County of Riverside, acting in his personal, private capacity to appoint an arbitrator and neither party shall raise any questions as to such judge's full power and jurisdiction to entertain the application and make the appointment. The arbitration shall be conducted and heard promptly after the selection of the arbitrator and the arbitrator shall render a written decision and award, including findings of fact, if appropriate, within sixty (60) days after the arbitration hearing. The decision and award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties, absent fraud or gross error. Landlord and Tenant shall share equally all costs in connection with the arbitration. 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -12- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the day and year first above written. THE JOHN W. KOENIG COMPANIES, a California corporation By: By: "LESSOR" LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic By: Chairman ATTEST: Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel 07/10/92 0617Q/2338/27 -13- "LESSEE" EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES (To Be Inserted) EXHIBIT B SITE MAP FOR RALPHS CENTER (To Be Inserted) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 16, 1991 ITEM TITLE: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE BUSINESS SESSION: OF ZONE 91 -063, AND PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (EA 91 -087) TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CONSENT CALENDAR: FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; CHANGE OF ZONE FROM STUDY SESSION: R -2 *4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLOT PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 116,664 SQ. FT. SHOPPING CENTER AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. APPLICANT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES BACKGROUND: The proposed project consists of a General P1an..Amendment from medium density residential to general commercial, a Change of Zone from R -2 *4000 to C -P (General Commercial) and Plot Plan application to allow the construction of a 116,664 square foot shopping center on the subject property. The Planning Commission considered this request at their meeting of April 9, 1991, and recommended approval as requested. The Plot Plan was approved subject to conditions. FISCAL UdPLICATION: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 1. By Minute Motion 91- accept the Planning Commission recommendation for approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 91 -008. 2. Motion to take up Ordinance 1'91 by title only and waive further reading. 3. Motion to introduce Ordinance rg-7 for first reading. 4. By Minute Motion 91- move to accept report of Planning Commission action on Plot Plan 91 -456. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: r atu #1/15. F6 RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER - •..x.'�.� +�. - .:. .....- .;c:;=d1 sex `.1., �� +.six.: -. . .. � .. ...:..�.c — - CAL LE lrAmplco - a �1 • N NTS ORT SCALE: NTS� t e g .4 Dx in P I x M •1N K '$A i o z v u LA aOM THE KOENG cotes • al O v P t•qrAw u I .. its x� i �tIL a i�. z If I 1 1 r I I � F y 8 i r i • '� E J r� E i ELEVATXM I u w LA OLOM CENTEA I "4F kOENf0 COMCAM" auan#. eraewA + 11131 u. -S"S J r( z h ♦.r l.. �v_r_]n .++- yy.r�s .n .r .v.M�.►: ii.e a ��•� -• �••• V � ... rwr r.� r A � �► ,: Lill i •.• �• Wd t. I" TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 16, 1991 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063, AND PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (EA 91-187) APPLICANT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL, CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -2 *4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLOT PLAN APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 116,664 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER, AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: An Environmental Assessment (EA 91 -187) has been prepared for the above project. Based upon this Assessment it has been determined that the project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment . Therefore a Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. BACKGROUND: Presently the site is zoned R -2 *4000 and designated Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) . The vacant site contains approximately 11.8 acres with dimensions of 700 feet by 736 feet. In order to utilize the property for the proposed shopping center of 116,664 square feet, the General Plan Amendment to General Commercial and subsequent Change of Zone to C -P is needed. The shopping center would consist of a supermarket and drug store along with other retail and commercial shops. Additionally, there would be four pad buildings located adjacent to Washington Street and Calle Tampico. Access is provided to the project through two driveways on each street. The northern Washington Street driveway would be signalized and shared with the property to the north when it develops. The easterly driveway on Calle Tampico would align with the new City Hall driveway and be signalized. The secondary access on each street will be right turn in and out only. MEMOSS.023 591 parking spaces have been provided at a ration of 5.061 per 1000 square feet of building area. The architectural design of the proposed project is Spanish in nature and would utilize exterior cement plaster and ceramic tile accents, wood trellis structures, and a mission tile clay roof . Two tower structures of 50 foot maximum height would act as architectural accents near Washington Street and along the westerly property line. The majority of the store fronts would be provided with a covered colonnade. A conceptual landscaping plan has been submitted for the project. Canopy type trees as well as Date Palms would be the major trees used on the property. Perimeter landscaping is designed to provide a lush look along the street frontage. Design of the landscaping will be modified and refined after this approval through reviews by the Design Review Board. The Design Review Board reviewed this project at their meeting of April 3, 1991, and recommended approval subject to a number of conditions which are listed in the approved Plot Plan conditions. A detailed description of the proposed project is contained in the attached Planning Commission report dated April 9, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission considered this request at their meeting of April 9, 1991, and recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone. Additionally, they approved the Plot Plan subject to conditions. Condition #11 was amended to require that a Noise Study determine the height of the screen wall next to the loading areas for the market and drug store. An additional condition was added allowing the Planning Commission to delete a building pad for parking if during plot plan review of a pad for a .restaurant use it is determined that a deficiency exists. During the hearing Mr. Peter Zelles spoke asking that the land on the south side of Calle Tampico, between the City Hall site and Desert Club Drive be rezoned commercial. FINDINGS: The findings which are necessary to approve this project can be made and. are contained in the draft Resolution for the General Plan Amendment (see separate resolution action on Agenda) and Ordinance for the Change of Zone. MEMOSS.023 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 1. By Minute Motion 91- accept the Planning Commission recommendation for approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 and confirmation of Environmental Determination as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution 91 -008. 2. Motion to take up Ordinance approving Change of Zone 91 -063 by title only and waive further reading. 3. Motion to introduce Ordinance approving Change of Zone 91 -063 for first reading. 4. By Minute Motion 91- move to accept report of Planning Commission action on Plot Plan 91-456. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Planning Commission Staff report dated April 9, 1991 3. Draft City Council Ordinance 4. Planning Commission Resolution 91 -008 5. Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan 91 -456 MEMOSS.023 3 PH -2 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 1991 CASE NOS. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035 CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063 PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (EA 91 -187) APPLICANT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES ARCHITECT: THE NADEL PARTNERSHIP, INC. REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL, CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -2 *4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLOT PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 116,664 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION EXISTING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) EXISTING ZONING: R- 2 - *4000 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: Environmental Assessment 91 -187 has been prepared in conjunction with these applications per the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. The initial study indicated that no significant environmental impacts will occur that cannot be mitigated by in position mitigation measures. These have been recommended as conditions of approval for the plot plan. Therefore, a Negative Declaration of environmental impact has been prepared for this project. SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USES: NORTH - R -1 & 4 -2 *8000; SOUTH - R -2 *4000; EAST - SR; WEST - R -2 *4000 & R -3; ST"FRPT.062 VACANT LAND VACANT LAND TO BE CIVIC CENTER SITE VACANT LAND & SINGLE FAMILY OLDER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE & APPROVED DUNE LA QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN �L DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The project site is 11.87+ Acre site with dimensions of 700 feet by 736 feet. The property is presently vacant and void of any significant vegetation. Power poles run along Calle Tampico and transverse the site from north to south. The property Is made up of one parcel and a portion of a second parcel. The site is relatively flat. APPLICATIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION: 1. General Plan Amendment 91 -035; this application is to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from medium density residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to general commercial. This change is necessary in order to rezone the property to commercial and allow subsequent construction of the shopping center. 2. Change of Zone 91 -063; this change of zone is to allow the zoning to be changed from the present residential R- 2 - *4000 to C -P (General Commercial) as requested by the Applicant. This zoning is necessary in order to allow the construction of the proposed shopping center. 3. Plot Plan 91 -456; this plot plan application would permit the construction of The proposed shopping center. STATISTICAL DATA: LAND: 11.8 ACRES (514,443 SF) BUILDING AREA: 116,664 SQUARE FEET PARKING PROVIDED: 591 STALLS PARKING RATIO: 5.061/1000 SQUARE FEET SITE DESIGN: The project is proposed to consist of one larger modified "L" shaped structure and four pad buildings. The "L" shaped building would consist of a 45,764 square foot market and 19,300 square foot drug store and other shops . The main building would be located adjacent to the west and northern property line. To the rear of the market in the northwest corner would be an 18,000 square foot retention basin. The four pad buildings would vary in size from 5,000 square feet to 6,000 square feet with three pads located along Washington Street and one adjaceni to Calle Tampico across from the new civic center site. While there is a small amount of parking to the rear of the drug store and market which would probably be utilized by employees, the majority of the parking is in the area adjacent to Washington Street and Calle Tampico. CIRCULATION /PARKING : Access is provided from two driveways on each street. The northerly driveway on Washington Street would be a shared driveway with the property to the north when it develops. This. access would be a full turning movement and would signalized for safety. The second access on Washington Street would be located to the south and would be a right turn in and out only. On Calle Tampico there would be a full turning movement driveway located across from the driveway for City Hall. This STAFFRPT.062 2 access would be signalized. The second access would be adjacent to the westerly property line and provide access to the rear of the market, drug store, and a number of the shops. Additionally, it has been designed to be a secondary emergency access for the property to the north. This access would be a right turn in and out only. The majority of the on site parking is angled spaces with one way aisles. Recessed loading docks are provided behind the market and drug store. LANDSCAPING /SCREENING: A conceptual landscaping plan has been submitted for this project. Date Palms would line the vehicular entries on Washington Street and at the main entry on Calle Tampico. The perimeter along the streets would be mounded and provided with canopy trees and lawn. Within the parking lot areas and adjacent to buildings other trees, shrubs and ground cover would be provided. Adjacent to the main "L" shaped structure, Date Palm trees would be spread out within the walkway area. A plaza area is indicated at the southwestern end of the supermarket. The conceptual plans at the present time indicate a fountain surrounded by an open patio area and trees. The architectural elevations for the plans also indicated a wall mounted fountain adjacent to the drug store. The site plan indicates a plaza area in a triangular shape to the east of shop one. However the landscaping plans do not indicate any features other than lawn and trees within this area. The submitted plans indicate low walls for screening of parking lot areas adjacent to the streets. No indication of design of these walls or height has been provided. The purpose of these walls is to screen the parking lot surface and cars from the adjacent street. The landscaping plans do not indicate a sidewalk at this time. An 8 foot wide meandering sidewalk .will need to be provided adjacent to the streets. Along the western property line, a landscape strip of approximately five feet is indicated. This landscape area does widen out somewhat near the market area due to the parking configuration at that point. Along the northern property line landscaping strips of varying widths are indicated with the exception of adjacent to the drug store loading area ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: The architectural design of the proposed project is Spanish in nature and would utilize exterior cement plaster and ceramic tile accents, wood trellis, and a multi- color mission clay tile roof. Two 50 foot high tower structures which would act as architectural accents would be located near the easterly corner of shop building #4 and at the center of building #1. The rear elevation of the proposed center would utilize mission clay tile roofing only at some corners. The balance of the rear walls are exterior cement plaster with some horizonal pop -out treatments at the top of the parapet and at the extension of the bottom of the tile roof. The architecture is similar in concept to the Village at Indian Wells shopping center located at the corner of Cook and Highway 111 which was also built by the Applicant. The majority of the main shop areas will be provided with a covered colonnade. No indication of architecture for the pad buildings has been submitted at this time. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: The Design Review Board reviewed the request at their meeting of April 3, 1991, and recommended approval subject to a number of conditions (see Plot Plan conditions) . STAFFRPT.062 3 11 ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES: As you recall the City recently adopted an Arts in Public Places Ordinance which requires either a development fee for public art to be paid or public art to be displayed on the project site. The development fee is required to be one -half of one percent of the building permit valuation, not to exceed $50,000. Should the Applicant wish to provide public art it must be approved by the Arts in Public Places Committee and comply with the requirements of the Ordinance. At this time the Applicant has not indicated whether he will provide public art or pay the development fee. ANALYSIS: The overall concept of the project is acceptable. However there are a number of items which Staff feels a need to comment on. They are: 1. Parking provided for the site is acceptable provided a large number of high parking users (i.e., restaurants) are not put in. Plans indicate a possible future expansion for the Ralph's market. It will have to be determined whether adequate parking exists at the time of the proposed expansion. 2. Because of the existing residential zoning to the north and west of the project site, the back area of the "L" shaped building will need to be well designed to minimize adverse conditions (i.e., loading areas, trash areas, delivery traffic, etc.). This necessitates screening of loading areas and limitations on delivery times and heavy landscaping and shielding of exterior light sources. 3. Because of the adjacent residential land uses, exterior lighting, especially parking lot lighting, will need to be sensitively treated. Therefore, maximum pole heights should be limited and light sources should be shielded and recessed to eliminate glare and spillover. 4. The off street parking section of the Code requires shopping cart parking lot storage areas. The submitted plan does not indicate these at this time. They will need to be provided by Code in a manner that does not interfere with off street parking spaces. 5. Should the Applicant wish to provide public art on the site, the corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico in the landscaped area would be an ideal location since it is across the street from the new City Hall and near the entry to the Village area. 6. Additional architectural treatment should be provided at the rears of the "L" building to provide an attractive four sided shopping center as required by the Design Review Board. 7. Staff feels that the proposed General Plan Amendment and subsequent Change of Zone to allow the construction of the shopping center is acceptable. It will provide a neighborhood shopping center within close proximity of the Cove and downtown area. This will reduce the need for citizens to drive to the center at Washington Street and Highway 111. This will in turn reduce the traffic impacts along Washington Street. STAFFRPT.062 4 i FINDINGS: The findings necessary to approve this project can be made and are contained in the draft resolutions for the Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment. RECORDATION: Staff recommends: 1. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 91- , recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035, and confirmation of the Environmental Determination. 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 91- recommending to the City Council approval of Change of Zone 91 -063, from R -2 *4000 to C -P. 3. That the Planning Commission approve Plot Plan 91 -456, subject to the attached condition: Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Environmental Assessment 91 -187 3. Comments from various City Departments and Agencies 4. Plan exhibits 5. Draft Planning Commission Resolution recommending GPA 91 -035 6. Draft Planning Commission Resolution recommending CZ 91 -063 7. Draft Conditions of Approval for PP 91 -456. STAFFRPT.062 5 CrTf Or Ll QQIiA ENVIKNMffXfAL 01ECKLIST FORK 2. BACKGRWV 1. Name of Proponent: cze ft 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Zi of LF1 3. Date of Checklist: hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: (i S. Name of Proposal, if applicable: IffA Q(- ($'7 _ x II. ENVIRONMENTAL DQACTS Will the proposal result in: (Explanation of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers is required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or The creation of objectionable odors? overcovering of the soil? _ e. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? JL d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? k e. Any increases in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X _ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach, sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or waters? stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, b. inlet or lake? k g. Exposure of people or property to geologic (3) hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ x 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ e. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate,' either locally or regionally? )c 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? e. Alterations to the course of flow of flood X waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow X of ground waters? S. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ (3) 0 (4) Yes Maybe No h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X is Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ X C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ X S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? _ x c. Introduction of new species of animals into in area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: - a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ 1( 7. Li t and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an X area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of any use of any natural k resources? b. Substantial depletion of any renewable natural resource? _ is 10. Risk of !!e set. Does the proposal involve a risk man explosion or the release of hazardous sub- stances (including, but not limited to, oil. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event X of an accident or upset conditions? _ 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, stdiriibuution, density, or growth rate of the k human population of an area? 12. Housin . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x _ 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional X vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (4) (S) Yes Maybe No c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? �C _ d., Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? _ x e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X _ 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? %C _ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x f. Other. governmental services? 15. Energy Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? i( b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ )� b. Communications systems? c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X 17. Hunan Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? g b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? g 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the o struction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ X _ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recrea- tional opportunities? _ 1( 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially re- duce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? r (S) e IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. -' I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is (required. Date: Signature r Yes Maybe No b. Does the project have the potential to achieve • short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, en- vironmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) — �( d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? — X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. -' I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is (required. Date: Signature r MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.) None are required other than approval of the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone. 9. Natural Resources: No adverse impact is anticipated with construction of this project. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 10. Risk of Upset: No adverse impact is anticipated due to explosion or release of hazardous substances. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 11. Population: It is not anticipated that the proposed project will have an adverse or significant impact on population distribution, density or growth rate in the area. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 12. Housing: With the proposed project there may be an incremental demand for additional housing for employees of the center. However, due to the size of the center any demand would be insignificant. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.) None is required' since there is a large supply of various types of housing within the City and surrounding areas. 13. Transportation/ Circulation: With the proposed project it can be anticipated that there will be a generation of additional vehicular movements within the area and on surrounding adjacent streets. The retail nature of the project will create a need for new parking facilities which will be provided on the site. The project will necessitate improvements of adjacent streets. The site is bounded by Washington Street to the east which is a major arterial and Calle Tampico which is designated as a primary arterial by the General Plan. Presently much of the traffic which would visit the site must travel on Washington Street and Calle Tampico to reach the existing shopping center at Washington Street and Highway 111. Therefore, while traffic volumes will increase in the immediate area it will probably not result in a major impact. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.) ' Compliance with all applicable City requirements regarding street improvements of adjacent streets. 2.) Project shall provide adequate parking per City requirements on site. STAFFRPT.061 3 3.) Sidewalk and bikeway paths shall be provided adjacent to Calle Tampico and Washington Street to allow non - vehicular access to the site. 14. Public Services: The project may create a need for additional fire protection, police protection and maintenance of public roads in the area. However, it is anticipated that any ihcreases in this area will be incremental. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.) Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant will be required. to pay infrastructure fee of $6,000 per acre. This fee will help mitigate impacts as noted above. 2.) Project shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Marshal. 15. Energy: No significant adverse impact is anticipated in the area of energy use and need for additional sources of energy. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 16. Utilities: Except for storm water drainage facilities no significant impact is anticipated in the area of utilities which include natural gas, communication systems, water, sewer, and solid waste. MITIGATION MEASURES: A retention basin will be provided to handle storm water drainage created on the site. 17. Human Health: No adverse impact is anticipated in the area of health hazards. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 18. Aesthetics: Since the site is presently vacant, the construction of buildings and other permanent facilities may partially obstruct view of the mountains surrounding the site. However, due to the size of the proposed construction and size of the site, it is not anticipated that any views will be significantly obstructed. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. 19. Recreation: No significant adverse impacts are anticipated in the area of recreational opportunities. MITIGATION MEASURES: None required. ST"FRPT. 061 4 20. Archaeological/ Historical: Due to the historical nature of the City, there may be an adverse impact created by the construction of the project. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. An archaeological survey of the site by qualified archaeologists will need to be completed prior to activities which would disturb the site (i.e., grading) . Compliance with the results of the archaeological survey will be required. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance: It is not anticipated that there will be any adverse impacts by the project in the areas of plant or animal life, long term environmental goals, cumulative impacts, or impacts on human beings. STAFFRPT.061 5 ESTABLISHED IN 1910 AS A KMILIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1ou • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE 019) MMI DIRECTORS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT RAYWOND R. RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT JOHN W. MtFADDEN DOROTHY M. NICHOLS THEODORE J. FISH Planning Commission City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen: OFFICERS THOMAS E. LEN. GENERAL MANAGER-0I0 ENGINEER January 30, 1991 BERNAMNE SUTTON. SECRETARY OWEN MCCOOK ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER REDWINE AND SKRRILL ATTORNEYS 1AEQ1YE() FEB 0 4 IgQ, CITY Ut- Lsi yu NTA MANNING & DEVELpUrMT 4rPT. Subject: General Plan Amendment 91 -035, Change of Zone 91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456, Portion of Northwest Quarter, Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone A0, depth one foot, on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the curreq regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 55 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. There are existing district facilities not shown on the development plans. There may be conflicts with these facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the district for the relocation of these facilities. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer RF:Imf /el cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health, Bermuda Dunes TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY I i r -, Date: / //I- 4�p/ To:' Attention: Regarding: Q .Palmer has existing plant at this location to serve this project. Palmer will serve this project, but a line extension will be needed, the extent of which will be- determined at the time we receive plans. Existing plant is away. A major ED line extension will be necessary to serve this project. Q Out of our area, will be unable to serve project. Sincerely, Clara Salisbury Account Executive CLS:blt Ctyrsp 41.725 Cook Street, Box 368 Telephone: (61913441312 Palmer CableVision Channel 10 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Telewpier: (619) 3442384 Services of Palmer Communication, Inc. r � SurrLine Transit MEMBER AGENCIES Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio La Ouinta Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Riverside County Mr. Stan Sawa Principle Planner City of La Quinta 75 -105 Calle Estcdo La Quinta, CA 92253 February 26, 1991 MAR 0 4 1991 CITY Ur LA YUINTA PLANNING & 9-Da 1PN!FNT 9EPT. RE: Koenig Company, GPA 91 -035, CZ91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456 Dear Stan: I have received the revised plans for the Koenig Company Project. I was sorry to see that the bus turnout had been removed from the plans. We feel very strongly that a bus turnout will be need at this particular project. Therefore, we are asking that the City ask the developer to reinstate the bus turnout in its original location on Tampico as close to the intersection with Washington as is reasonably feasible. In addition, we ask that a passenger walkway be made available from the bus stop area into the main store. Please keep me informed as to the status of this project. If I can be of further assistance, please give me a call at 343 -3456. Yours Very Truly, SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Debra Astin Director of Planning DA/dc r�. ")`0 , icIoN IAIAA.." . FAX (6191 343-3845 GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF To: City of La Quints Planning Division Re: Plot Plan 91 -456 Koenig Companies RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN 1ACINTO AVENUE • PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657 -3183 RED APR 02 1991 CITY OF LA QUINTA PLANNING & DMOPM DIF- April 2, 1991 With respect to the condition of approval regarding the above referenced Plot Plan, the Fire Department requires the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code and /or recognized fire protection standards: 1. The water mains shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 5000 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi. 2. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2J" x 2} "), will be located not less than 25' or more than 165' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit applicant /developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review /approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 4. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any combustible material being placed on the site. 5. Buildings shall be constructed so that the fire flow required for any individual building or unseparated area does not exceed 3500 gpn. 6. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). System plans must be submitted with a plan check /inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the huilding plans. 0 MO OFF>X 79=733 Courwy Club Drive. Suke F. harm, G 92201 (619) 3428886 • FAX (619) 775.2o72 PLANNING DIVISION 0 RIVERSIDE OFFICE O TEMECU A OFFICE 41002 County Center Drive, Suite 225, Temeavh, G 92390 (714) 694 -5070 • FAX (714) 694.5076 To: City of La Quinta - Planning Div. 4/2/91 Re: Plot Plan 91 -456 Koenig Companies Page 2. 7. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. 8. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet 110, but not less than 2AIOBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 9. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 10. Certain designated areas wi11 be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed. A plan check fee must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building plans are submitted. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Planning & Engineering Staff at (619) 342 -8886. Sincerely, RAY REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By 711r, Tom Hutchison Fire Safety Specialist to GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF TO# City of La Quinta Planning Division RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE • PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657 -3183 RECEIVED FEB 26 190' 01 Y Ur- LA YUiNTWTEs February 279 1991 'LANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. REs General Plan Amendment 91 -035 Change of Zone 91 -063 With respect to the review of the above referenced cases, the proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact on the Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts are due to the increased number of emergency or public service calls generated by additional buildings and human population. This project will contribute to the need for additional fire equipments personnel, and /or a fire station. A funding source should be identified for the portion of the impacts associated with capitol improvements or one -time costs such as land, buildings, and equipment. If the annual costs necessary for an increased level of service are not off -set by the additional County structural tax, an increase in the Fire Department's annual operating budget will be required. All questions regarding the above requirements should be referred to the Fire Department Planning & Engineering Staff. cc B -7 Sincerely, Ray Regis Chief Fire Department Planner By, Tom Hutchison Fire Safety Specialist PLANNING DIVISION O INDIO OFFICE O iSEClilA OFFICE 79.733 Country Club Drive Suite F. Indio, CA 92201 41002 County Cana Drive, Suite 225, Temmuh, G 92390 (619) 3428886 • FAX (619) 7752072 0 RIVERSIDE (714) 691.5070 • FAX (714) 694-5076 APR - 9 1991 CITY Ur LA QUINTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. qlA c� r LA Qo I HTa4 - wrox 9r * CALV--rAv I co P%di p TooYlocD Tatt!'1 N 6 2-0 MD - gm WAL. I . V4WT 4'soao 411 t. t oc' . 19,3oo c� a t %zc�o 3 426 has 15 5P 5, l5 D 35 �' • TZ•�(Y1d�►N6�'XC•� �ttrlNG �A a1JNG jZ-F� O 20/ '000 � •� '7Vtsuc. Are ',Ar • e<-:RVALS I RdMvDgr own GVIW (2A L. T611 c lo ho 5-vi- IC 4-7 4mLs i'm looc, `-�- 11 xa"gfvj=� wq4 !3l -tF%a:% St'�uS Ag�kl►N6 -vt,tL AM GOV-% %Lcr.. Ate '•9.91 , 691 %r LLS �zs I�b C 3�� t �1 The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE RECE,jrcp April 5, 1991 APR 0 8 1991 LnYvrLA °tAPINING � �u'NTA pEyflp Mr. Jerry Herman MT DEn. CITY OF LA QUINTA 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: NWC Calle Tampico and Washington Street - Art in Public Places Dear Jerry, The purpose of this letter is to request a waiver of the conditions imposed by City Council Ordinance 4173 in which chapter 2.65 was added dealing with art in public places. From the site plan and elevation information already presented to the city, we have attempted to design a quality center to be well landscaped in which we'll feature many "user friendly" outdoor public conveniences. We do not have a central atrium or common point of entry such as is found in many office buildings where artwork would be a focal point of that entry. Consequently, we prefer to devote our construction budget to implementing as fully as possible attractive areas for visitors and customers to our shopping center complex. Consequently, a waiver of the Art in Public Places Ordinance is requested. Despite the fact that we are in a redevelopment area, we have not yet requested from the redevelopment agency any other form of assistance. Please let me know what I may do further to pursue this waiver of request. Thank you. Very Truly Yours, J hn W. Koenig 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 • Torrance, California 90505 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLOT PLAN 91 -456 - APPROVED APRIL 9, 1991 GENERAL r,- 1 The development of the property shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for PP 91 -456, unless amended otherwise by the following conditions. 2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the final approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is contemplated by this approval, not including grading which is begun within the one year period and is thereafter diligently pursued until completion. A one year time extension may be requested as permitted by Municipal Code. 3. Approval of this plot plan shall be subject to final approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 and Change of Zone 91 -063. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage or sales displays without specific approval of the Planning Commission. 5. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to shine directly on surrounding adjoining properties or public rights -of -way. Alternative parking lot lighting plans utilizing light pole standards varying in height from 20 feet to 35 feet shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Light standard type with recessed light source shall also be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Exterior lighting shall comply with Outdoor Light Control Ordinance and off - street parking requirements. 6. Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided for all structures and provided with opaque metal doors. Plans for trash enclosures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall contact local waste management company to insure that enclosure size is adequate. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry wall shall be provided adjacent to north and west property lines except within ten feet of street right -of -way line where wall shall be reduced in height to 30 inches. Decorate enclosure may be required by City around detention basin depending on grading and other screening. 8. Future expansion of Ralph's supermarket shall be subject to Planning Commission approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking demand shall be reviewed at that time to insure adequate parking is provided. 9. Handicapped parking spaces and facilities shall be provided per Municipal Code and State requirements. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 10. As required by the General Plan, Applicant shall provide noise study by qualified engineer to determine impacts on surrounding residential zones and uses. Noise study shall suggest mitigation measures which City can require. 11. Screen wall height adjacent to loading docks shall be determined by required Noise Study. Should noise problems from use of loading areas arise, Planning Commission shall retain the right to limit the hours of loading and unloading. Surrounding property owners and residents which could be affected by noise shall be notified of Planning Commission consideration of limitations on delivery hours. 12. The project shall comply with all existing off street parking requirements including but not limited to shading of parking lot areas, shopping cart storage, and bicycle parking spaces. 13. Decorative screen walls provided adjacent to street shall be high enough to screen parking lot surface and majority of parked cars from view of street. Determination of height of walls shall be made after review of landscaping and grading plans by City. 14. Landscaping planters along the north and west property lines shall be provided at maximum width possible with all unusable areas adjacent to property lines provided in landscaping. 15. The project shall comply with applicable Arts in Public Places Ordinance. 16. Meandering six foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on Calle Tampico. On Washington Street the sidewalk shall be a meandering 8 foot sidewalk with sidewalk not touching curb at any point except at driveways and intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. 17. Tower structures shall be a maximum 50 foot height. 18. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, a parcel map or lot line adjustment shall be approved and recorded to separate subject property from properties to the north. 19. The City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, with the Developer to pay costs, to prepare a mitigation and monitoring plan for artifact location and recovery. Prior to archaeological studies for this site as well as other unrecorded information, shall be analyzed prior to the preparation of the plan. The plan shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) for a two -week review and comment period. At a minimum, the plan shall: 1) identify the means for digging test pits; 2) allow sharing the information with the CVAS; and 3) provide for further testing if the preliminary result show significant materials are present. CONAPRVL.009 1 2 � " Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 9, 1991 The final plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for final review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall have retained a qualified cultural resources management firm and completed the testing and data recovery as noted in the plan. The management firm shall monitor the grading activity as required by the plan or testing results. A list of the qualified archaeological monitor(s), cultural resources management firm employees, and any assistants) /representative(s), shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The list shall provide the current address and' phone number for each monitor. The designated monitors may be changed from time to time, but no such change shall be effective unless served by registered or certified mail on the Planning and Development Department . The designated monitors or their authorized representatives shall have the authority to temporarily divert, -redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of resources. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further grading, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until appropriate mitigation measures are completed. Upon completion of the data recovery, the Developer shall cause three copies of the final report containing the data analysis to be prepared and published and submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this use, the Applicant shall obtain permits or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o City of La Quinta Planning & Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Department at the time of application for a building permit for the proposed project. 21. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of building permits. 22. Final landscaping plans shall include approval stamps and signatures from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioners office and Coachella Valley Water District. CONAPRVL.009 3 ,, , , . Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 April 9, 1991 23. Bus turnout and bus waiting shelter shall be provided as requested by Sunline Transit when street improvements are installed. 24. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire site which shall be for the purpose of wind and erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blow sand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a.) use of irrigation during construction and grading activities; b.) areas not constructed on during first phase shall be planted in temporary ground cover or wildflowers and provided with temporary irrigation system; and c.) provision of wind breaks or wind rolls, fencing, and or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with requirements of the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent emission of dust and blow sand. 25. Construction shall comply with all local and State Building Code requirements in affect at time of issuance of building permit as determined by the Building Official. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to a final building inspection approval, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The Planning and Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 27. If shopping carts are placed outside, they shall be screened from view of the parking lot in a manner which is approved by the Planning and Development Director. 28. A parking lot striping plan including directional arrows, stop signs, no parking areas, and parking spaces shall be approved by Planning and Development and Engineering Departments prior to issuance of a building permit. All roof equipment shall be screened from view by parapet walls of building or other architecturally matching materials. Construction of pad buildings shall be subject to approval of a non -public hearing plot plan and approval by the Planning Commission. 29. All compact spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only" 30. That all conditions of the Design Review Board shall be complied with as follows: r CONAPRVL.009 4 I - Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 A. A detailed complete sign program shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of first sign permit. Sign program shall include any center identification signs. B . The architecture materials and colors of the pad building shall be architecturally compatible (i.e., identical architecture, colors, and /or materials) with the main shopping center building. C. Cement plaster texture used on building shall be of a decorative nature and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. D. Additional architectural treatment to the rear of the main building shall be provided in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties and approved by the Planning and Development Department. E. Along the street perimeters, the amount of turf utilized shall be reduced (i.e., eliminate on back sides of slopes, and between sidewalk and curb areas) . F. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific trees, shrubs, and ground covers, and irrigation system type shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of final landscaping plans. G . Additional landscaping planting shall be provided in areas between fronts of main building and parking lot area. H . Water efficient irrigation system including bubblers and emitters shall be utilized wherever possible. I . Landscaping adjacent to north and west property lines shall be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with adjacent residentially zoned properties. J. All planting materials shall be water efficient to maximum extend feasible. 31. The plaza areas as shown on the approved site plan shall be developed into shaded lounging areas with permanent seating provided. Said plans to be approved by the City at the time of landscaping plan review. CITY FIRE MARSHAL 32. The water mains shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 5000 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi. CONAPRVL.009 5 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 33. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" X 4" X 2-1/21' X 2-1/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . 34. Prior to issuance of building permit Applicant/ Developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review /approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department 35. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any combustible material being placed on the site. 36. Buildings shall be constructed so that the fire flow required for any individual building or unseparated area does not exceed 3500 gpm. 37. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). System plans must be submitted with a plan check /inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 38. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. 39. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 40. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 41. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: 42. The Applicant shall dedicate public street right -of -way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 A. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 foot half width; the Washington Street Specific Plan applies; B . Calle Tampico - Primary Arterial, 50 foot half width; the Calle Tampico Specific Alignment applies; 43. The Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Calle Tampico and Washington Street from the site except as specifically provided in these Conditions of Approval. 44. Access locations to the site and the character of the turning movements at those locations shall be as follows unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: A. Washington Street ( 305 feet north of Calle Tampico centerline) , the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with the turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. B . Washington Street ( 750 feet north of the Calle Tampico centerline) , the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. C. Calle Tampico ( the driveway shall align with the Civic Center driveway), the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -141) wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. D. Calle Tampico (the west edge of the driveway shall be 5 feet east of the west site boundary), .the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. 45. The Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback lot of noted width adjacent to the following street right- of- way(s): A. Calle Tampico, 20 feet wide; B. Washington Street, 20 feet wide. 46. The Applicant shall form a merchant's association and obligate the association with the fiscal and operational maintenance responsibility for the maintenance and continued upkeep of the landscape setback lot and parkway area adjacent to the roadway along the segments of Calle Tampico and Washington Street that are contiguous to the site boundary. As an alternative, the Applicant may choose to maintain the above areas. 47. Landscape and irrigation plans for the landscaped lot(s) shall be prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Planning Director, and City Engineer, and approved by same officials prior to construction. CONAPRVL.009 7 ,. , ' t r 1 I Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 48. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and on -site common area improvements before the issuance of a site grading permit. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective construction cost, for those improvements which involve fair -share responsibility that must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash in lieu of construction may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by the Applicant and City Engineer, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 49. The on -site grading plan shall be prepared by a register civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the grading permit. 50. The Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on the Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during grading of the site and construction of the improvements to insure compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant and charged with the compliance responsibility shall make the following certifications upon completion of construction: A . All grading and improvements were properly monitored by qualified personnel during construction for compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances and thereby certify the grading to be in full compliance with those documents. B . The finished building pad elevations conform with the approved grading plans. 51. Storm water run -off produced in 24 hours by a 100 year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless the Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 52. The Applicant shall have a focused master drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm water disposal facilities are needed to protect the site from flooding by off site storm water. If the drainage study recommends the construction of off site storm water disposal facilities, the Applicant shall participate in the cost of the facilities, on a fair share basis. The tributary area to be studies includes all tributary land south of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, east of the Bear Creek Channel and west of Washington Street. CONAPRVL.009 8 � � :� r Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 53. Applicant shall install a trickling sand filter and leach field in the retention basin to percolate nuisance water in conformance with requirements of the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 160 gallons per day per 5000 s . f . of landscaping. 54. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 55. The Applicant shall participate in the cost of the designing and installing street improvements. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and adopted Standard Drawings, and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name signs, sidewalks, and raised medians where required by City General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with City standards and practices. This includes tapered off site street transitions that extend beyond project site boundaries and join the widened and unwidened street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street (Calle Tampico to northerly boundary of site) Install half -width Major Arterial, refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 2. Calle Tampico (Washington Street to westerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Primary Arterial (100 feet right -of -way option) refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 56. The Applicant shall participate in the cost, noted as follows, of designing and installing traffic signals at the following locations: A. Washington Street at Calle Tampico, 25% cost participation. CONAPRVL.009 9 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 B . Calle Tampico, approximately 550 feet west of Washington Street, 50% cost participation. C. Washington Street, approximately 750 feet north of Calle Tampico, 100% initial cost participation subject to 50% reimbursement when adjacent property to north develops. 57. The Applicant shall construct meandering sidewalk in the parkway and landscaped setback lot along Calle Tampico (6 feet wide) and Washington Street (8 feet wide) . 58. The Applicant shall provide a blank easement that covers the entire landscaped setback lots for the purpose of a meandering public sidewalk. 59. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 60. All existing and proposed electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, and are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 61. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 62. The site shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity, caused by a storm event greater than the 100 year 24 hour event, to flow out of the tract through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the tract shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow for those occasions when a storm greater than the 100 year 24 hour event occurs. 63. The Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fe amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 64. The Applicant shall design and construct the parking lot in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code Off - Street Parking Ordinance. If the pad locations are proposed to be utilized by eating establishments, the Planning Commission during Plot Plan review shall consider whether adequate off - street parking exists. If it is determined that additional parking is needed, the Planning Commission may require an unused pad to be converted to off - street parking. CONAPRVL.009 10 • r , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91- 001r A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CONCURRENCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91 -187 AND APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91 -035, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. CASE NO. GPA 91-035 - THE KOENIG COMPANIES WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 9th day of April, 1991, hold a duly- noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of The Koenig Companies to amend the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to General Commercial for a site totaling 11.8 gross acres, located at the northwest corner of Washington Street & Calle Tampico, more particularly described as: APN 769 -030 -007 and a portion of 769- 030 -032 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify the approval of said General Plan Amendment: 1. Traffic impacts caused by the implementation of GPA 91 -035 can be mitigated to a large degree. 2. The request for commercial land use is consistent with the intent of the La Quinta General Plan. 3. This General Plan Amendment application complies with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside Resolution No. 82 -213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5). Mitigation measures can be generated to reduce the impact of General Commercial land uses on the subject property. CS /RESOPC.011 - 1 - t � � � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 91 -035 consisting of a Land Use Map Amendment as described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this 9th day of April, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUE STEDING, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: JERRY HERMAN, Planning Director City of La Quinta, California CS /RESOPC.011 - 2 - � � y � 40 W- i 'It14A * • +-7 35•$a' 0 1 o SINE Met MEDIU DENSI�( � Z "`'` +� RESIDE TIAL TO ® GENER COMMERCIAL i� CASE MAP CASE Na G P A 91 -036 EXHIBIT "A' NTS I r �. ) vA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF— ZONE 91 -063 CASE NO. CZ 91 -063 - THE KOENIG COMPANIES The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Section 4.1 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 (which was adopted by reference by this City Council by Ordinance 5, operative August 29, 1982) and La Quinta District Official Zoning Plan Map 14, as amended, are further amended by rezoning from R -2 *4000 to C -P, the parcel shown and depicted for such rezoning on the map which is attached to and made a part of this Ordinance, and which attached map is labeled Exhibit "A ", Change of Zone 91 -063. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Change of Zone has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution 82 -213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance 5) , in that the Planning Director conducted an initial study and has determined that the proposed Change of Zone will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. G--- )� 0-- Nee) C-1 K-u� SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 16th day of April, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ORDDRFT.002 1 c ;. a' . � 1 , JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California ORDDRFT.002 2 �; �- •- ., tii J S� *W. ti City Council Minutes 7 March 19, 1991 Mr. Herman presented staff report advising that the Planning Commission recommended approval, however he recommended that Council open & close the Public Hearing and postpone the decision until April 16, 1991 when another General Plan application will be acted on. WALLY REYNOLDS, 79 -860 Fiesta Drive, addressed Council and advised that the is speaking for the owner Don Howard and stated that he agrees with the General Plan amendment and annexation. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Sniff /Bohnenberger to continue this matter until April 16, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 91 -43. 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -034 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITY" AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WESTWARD HO DR., BETWEEN THE ADAMS ST. ALIGNMENT AND DUNE PALMS. Mr. Herman requested that this item be continued until April 6, 1991. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger/ Rushworth to continue this item until April 16, 1991. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 91 -44. 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063 AND PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91 -187) TO AMEND GENERAL PLAN FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -2 -4,000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLOT. PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 116,664 SQ. FT. SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLS TAMPICO - APPLICANT: KOENIG COMPANIES. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN MOTION - It was moved by Council Members Bohnenberger /Sniff to continue the Public Hearing until April 16, 1991. Motion carried.unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 91 -45. z 5 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 19, 1991 ITEM TITLE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063. PLOT PLAN 91 -456, AND CONFIRMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91 -187) TO AMEND GENERAL PLAN FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -2 -4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND PLOT PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 116,664 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. APPLICANT: KOENIG COMPANIES BACKGROUND: FILE COPY AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: This item was scheduled for Planning Commission action at their meeting of March 12, 1991. However, prior to that hearing the Applicant requested a continuation of all scheduled hearings. This is to allow time for them to refine their development concepts. The requested continuation is to the April 16, 1991 City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Continue public hearing to the meeting of April 16, 1991. Submitted by: "gnat e CC #3 /19.F3 /CS Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER The ro)ENIG Compa-�-1199- REAL ESTATE REG'E(�i9 MA 0 51991 C'V1•LA 14109A February 27, 1991 Mr. Jerry Herman Planning and Development Director City of la Quints 79 -105 Calls Estado La Quint &, CA 92253 RE: Northwest Corner - Calls Tampico and Washington Street - La Quinta, CA Dear Jerry, The purpose of this letter is to request that the above referenced shopping center project which has been scheduled for review by the Design Review Board, the Planning Commission, and the City Council during the month of March be rescheduled to the following meetings: 1. Design Review Wednesday, April 3 S:30 p.m. 2. Planning Commission Tuesday. April 9 7:00 p.m. 3. City Council Tuesday. April 16 7:00 p.m. I apologize for the need to postpone these hearing dates. However, in order to provide the type product we feel appropriate. the delay was necessary in order to better refine our development concepts. If you have any questions, please be sure and let me know. Very Truly Yours, 4:Koe - J hn W . g 2601 Akpori Drive Suite 240 v Torrance Co6tornio 90505 (213) 534 -8060 • FAX (213) 534 -8220 CALLS rAupxo - — . CASE MAP CASE Na GPA 91 -035 PP 91 -456 CZ 91 -063 LOCATION MAP N N7s ORTH SCALE: NTS - CITY OF LA QuiNTARLE CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of La Quinta City Council will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on March 19, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers, 78 -105 Calle Estado, on the following item: ITEM: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063 PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91 -187) APPLICANT: KOENIG COMPANIES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO a.r REQUESTS: APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R- 2 - *4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) N OR OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE AND PLOT PLAN SFE APPLICATION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 116,664 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER. LEGAL: APN 769 - 030-007 PORTION OF 769 - 030 -032 uut rerpro The La Quinta Planning and Development Department has completed an environmental assessment on the project. Based upon this assessment, the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The La Quinta City Council will consider the adoption of the Negative Declaration along with the project at the Hearing. Any person may submit written comments on the project to the Planning and Development Department prior to the Hearing and /or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and /or the project at the time of the Hearing. If you challenge the decision of these project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised either at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning and Development Department, at or prior to the Public Hearing. The project file may be viewed by the public Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. at the Planning and Development Department, La Quinta City Hall, 78 -099 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. DO NOT PRINT BELOW THIS LINE PUBLISH ONCE ON FEBRUARY 27, 1991 _JA STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 28, 1992 CASE: PLOT PLAN 91 -456 APPLICANT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES PH#3 REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR A PLOT PLAN FOR A-117,000+ SQ. FT. SHOPPING CENTER LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS APPROVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION DURING THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL IN 1991. NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT AT THIS TIME. THEREFORE, NO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION IS DEEMED NECESSARY. BACKGROUND: The proposed project site is approximately 12 acres and would consist of approximately 117, 000 square feet of floor space. This application was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 1991 and accepted by the City Council on April 16, 1991. In addition to this plot plan, a general plan amendment (GPA 91 -035) and a change of zone (CZ 91 -063) were also approved by the City Council on April 16, 1991, in order to facilitate the proposed project. Attached are copies of the approved plans and Conditions of Approval. EXTENSION REQUEST: The Applicant has submitted a letter requesting a one year extension. The Applicant notes that they are continuing to work at finalizing the leasing and financial commitments necessary to construct the project. If this request is approved, the new expiration date will be April 9, 1993. COMMENTS. ON APPROVED CONDITIONS: The Planning and Development Department has circulated this request for comments. The only comment received was from the Engineering Department and pertained to Condition #42. The Engineering Department has requested that the following be added to Condition #42 which pertains to street dedications on Washington Street and Calle Tampico: PCST.054 1 • "Applicant shall executes right -of -way conveyance documents and return them to the City within 30 days after they are furnished to the Applicant by the City." The reason for this request is that street improvements are presently being made to Washington Street and will shortly be made to Calle Tampico. Therefore it is necessary to obtain the right -of -way as soon as possible. ANALYSIS: The Planning Department Staff feels that this request is acceptable. The Applicant is continuing to work on this project and the project is desirable. RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 92- move to approve a one year extension of time for Plot Plan 92 -456 subject to the amendment to Condition #42 as recommended by the Engineering Department. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Plot Plan and elevation plans 3. Conditions of Approval 4. Recommended Amendment from Engineering Department PCST.054 2 H - CALLE UWICO CASE MAP CASENm GPA 91 -035 PP 91 -456 CZ 91 -063 LOCATION MAP N NTS NTS m-'M �N���rrrr :.. . � \ i s e , tb �.v ■ � � I q f I \` s i i . v �• �1 } f I i �w� _1___--__ WArAW l � � | / LA QCIINTA VILLAGE PROJECT: 11 Acre neighborhood shopping center by the developer of Village I and Village III Indian Wells. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico, directly across from planned civic center. TENANT MIX: Ralphs Market 45,764 SF Drug Store 19,300 SF Shops 29,425 SF Pad Bldgs 22,000 SF TOTAL 116,489 SF VICINITY MAP SITE N ^ =4N FUTURE Z gVIC CE/rtER .A 1 1,u: S.F. {• t .11 1.180 S.F. S'1.623 S.F. SMP suwlNO NO.4 IA 11 wo st. ro I 000 Of. 1 1C 1600 S.F. 10 1,600 S.F. N J C 1E A� 1,000 S. IF 44III 1.00o Sy. =I� �.J « 760 0 S.F. : J 1,a60 0 S.F. >« 1.000 IL - -_76o S.F. r� / IM « 760 $s. 1 1r IR n SHOP 9uLDINO ND.1 00o SF e��N �F � 'o�� I uF/ Lu■ {ul 1100 � . • 1100 t a. Leasing Information: SUSANNE CONDON (619) 564- 2270 (213) 534- 8060 THE KOENIC COMPANIES • 2601 Airport Drive Suite 240 Torrance California 90505 SHOPS #4 tt t nir u.q i t ;4 P ■;■ •r is �%• . '/ ,,.,.. ,, � .� BIM .TOP CALLE TAMPICO Traffic Signal PAD D' 5.500 S.F. Fowl AN, i i' N `I Proposed i O Traff+- Slg` I•- W W Q 2 ,0 V 2 2 N G CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . PLOT PLAN 91 -456 - RECOMMENDED APRIL 28, 1992 * Amended by Planning Commission 4 -28 -92 GENERAL 1. The development of the property shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for PP 91 -456, unless amended otherwise by the following conditions. 2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the final approval date ( April 16, 1991) ; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is contemplated by this approval, not including grading which is begun within the one year period and is thereafter diligently pursued until completion. A one year time extension may be requested as permitted by Municipal Code. 3. Approval of this plot plan shall be subject to final approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 and Change of Zone 91 -063. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage or sales displays without specific approval of the Planning Commission. 5. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to shine directly on surrounding adjoining properties or public rights -of -way. Alternative parking lot lighting plans utilizing light pole standards varying in height from 20 feet to 35 feet shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Light standard type with recessed light source shall also be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Exterior lighting shall comply with Outdoor Light Control Ordinance and off - street parking requirements. 6. Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided for all structures and provided with opaque metal doors. Plans for trash enclosures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall contact local waste management company to insure that enclosure size is adequate. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry wall shall be provided adjacent to north and west property lines except within ten feet of street right -of -way line where wall shall be reduced in height to 30 inches. Decorate enclosure may be required by City around detention basin depending on grading and other screening. 8. Future expansion of Ralph's supermarket shall be subject to Planning Commission approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking demand shall be reviewed at that time to insure adequate parking is provided. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 9. Handicapped parking spaces and facilities shall be provided per Municipal Code and State requirements. 10. As required by the General Plan, Applicant shall provide noise study by qualified engineer to determine impacts on surrounding residential zones and uses. Noise study shall suggest mitigation measures which City can require. 11. Screen wall height adjacent to loading docks shall be determined by required Noise Study. Should noise problems from use of loading areas arise, Planning Commission shall retain the right to limit the hours of loading and unloading.. Surrounding property owners and residents which could be affected by noise shall be notified of Planning Commission consideration of limitations on delivery hours. 12. The project shall comply with all existing off street parking requirements including but not limited to shading of parking lot areas, shopping cart storage, and bicycle parking spaces. 13. Decorative screen walls provided adjacent to street shall be high enough to screen parking lot surface and majority of parked cars from view of street. Determination of height of walls shall be made after review of landscaping and grading plans by City. 14. Landscaping planters along the north and west property lines shall be provided at maximum width possible with all unusable areas adjacent to property lines provided in landscaping. 15. The project shall comply with applicable Arts in Public Places Ordinance. 16. Meandering six foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on Calle Tampico. On Washington Street the sidewalk shall be a meandering 8 foot sidewalk with sidewalk not touching curb at any point except at driveways and intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. 17 . Tower structures shall be a maximum 50 foot height. 18. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, a parcel map or lot line adjustment shall be approved and recorded to separate subject property from properties to the north. 19. The City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, with the Developer to pay costs, to prepare a mitigation and monitoring plan for artifact location and recovery. Prior to archaeological studies for this site as well as other unrecorded information, shall be analyzed prior to the preparation of the plan. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 The plan shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) for a two -week review and comment period. At a minimum, the plan shall: 1) identify the means for digging test pits; 2) allow sharing the information with the CVAS; and 3) provide for further testing if the preliminary result show significant materials are present. The final plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for final review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall have retained a qualified cultural resources management firm and completed the testing and data recovery as noted in the plan. The management firm shall monitor the grading activity as required by the plan or testing results. A list of the qualified archaeological monitor(s), cultural resources management firm employees, and any assistant (s) / representative (s) , shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The list shall provide the current address and phone number for each monitor. The designated monitors may be changed from time to time, but no such change shall be effective unless served by registered or certified mail on the Planning and Development Department. The designated monitors or their authorized representatives shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of resources. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further grading, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until appropriate mitigation measures are completed. Upon completion of the data recovery, the Developer shall cause three copies of the final report containing the data analysis to be prepared and published and submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this use, the Applicant shall obtain permits or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o City of La Quinta Planning & Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Department at the time of application for a building permit for the proposed project. CONAPRVL.009 3 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 21. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of building permits. 22. Final landscaping plans shall include approval stamps and signatures from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioners office and Coachella Valley Water District. 23. Bus turnout and bus waiting shelter shall be provided as requested by Sunline Transit when street improvements are installed. 24. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire site which shall be for the purpose of wind and erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blow sand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a. ) use of irrigation during construction and grading activities; b. ) areas not constructed on during first phase shall be planted in temporary ground cover or wildflowers and provided with temporary irrigation system; and c.) provision of wind breaks or wind rolls, fencing, and or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with requirements of the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent emission of dust and blow sand. 25. Construction shall comply with all local and State Building Code requirements in affect at time of issuance of building permit as determined by the Building Official. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to a final building inspection approval, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The Planning and ' Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 27. If shopping carts are placed outside, they shall be screened from view of the parking lot in a manner which is approved by the Planning and Development Director. 28. A parking lot striping plan including directional arrows, stop signs, no parking areas, and parking spaces shall be approved by Planning and Development and Engineering Departments prior to issuance of a building permit. All roof equipment shall be screened from view by parapet walls of building or other architecturally matching materials. Construction of pad CONAPRVL.009 4 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 buildings shall be subject to approval of a non -public hearing plot plan and approval by the Planning Commission. 29. All compact spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only". 30. That all conditions of the Design Review Board shall be complied with as follows: A. A detailed complete sign program shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of first sign permit. Sign program shall include any center identification signs. B . The architecture materials and colors of the pad building shall be architecturally compatible (i.e., identical architecture, colors, and /or materials) with the main shopping center building. C . Cement plaster texture used on building shall be of a decorative nature and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. D . Additional architectural treatment to the rear of the main building shall be provided in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties and approved by the Planning and Development Department. E. Along the street perimeters, the amount of turf utilized shall be reduced (i.e., eliminate on back sides of slopes, and between sidewalk and curb areas) . F. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific trees, shrubs, and ground covers, and irrigation system type shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of final landscaping plans. G : Additional landscaping planting shall be provided in areas between fronts of main building and parking lot area. H . Water efficient irrigation system including bubblers and emitters shall be utilized wherever possible. I. Landscaping adjacent to north and west property lines shall be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with adjacent residentially zoned properties. J. All planting materials shall be water efficient to maximum extend feasible. CONAPRVL.009 5 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 31. The plaza areas as shown o shaded lounging areas with approved by the City at the CITY FIRE MARSHAL n the approved site plan shall be developed into permanent seating provided. Said plans to be time of landscaping plan review. 32. The water mains shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 5000 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi. 33. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" X 4" X 2-1/2" X 2-1/211), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . 34. Prior to issuance of building permit Applicant /Developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/ approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. " 35. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any combustible material being placed on the site. 36. Buildings shall be constructed so that the fire flow required for any individual building or unseparated area does not exceed 3500 gpm. 37. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s) . System plans must be submitted with a plan check/ inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 38. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. 39. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A1OBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. CONAPRVL.009 6 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 40. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 41. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: *42. The Applicant shall dedicate public street right -of -way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: A. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 foot half width; the Washington Street Specific Plan applies; B. Calle Tampico - Primary Arterial, 50 foot half width; the Calle Tampico Specific Alignment applies; Applicant shall execute right -of -way conveyance documents and return them to the City within 30 days after they are furnished to the Applicant by the City. 43. The Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Calle Tampico and Washington Street from the site except as specifically provided in these Conditions of Approval. 44. Access locations to the site and the character of the turning movements at those locations shall be as follows unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: A . Washington Street ( 305 feet north of Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with the turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. B . Washington Street ( 750 feet north of the Calle Tampico centerline) , the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -141) wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. C. Calle Tampico (the driveway shall align with the Civic Center driveway), the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. D. Calle Tampico (the west edge of the driveway shall be 5 feet east of the west site boundary), the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. 45. The Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback lot of noted width adjacent to the following street right -of- way(s) : CONAPRVL.009 7 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 A. Calle Tampico, 20 feet wide; B . Washington Street, 20 feet wide. 46. The Applicant shall form a merchant's association and obligate the association with the fiscal and operational maintenance responsibility for the maintenance and continued upkeep of the landscape setback lot and parkway area adjacent to the roadway along the segments of Calle Tampico and Washington Street that are contiguous to the site boundary. As an alternative, the Applicant may choose to maintain the above areas. 47. Landscape and irrigation plans for the landscaped lots) shall be prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Planning Director, and City Engineer, and approved by same officials prior to construction. 48. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and on -site common area improvements before the issuance of a site grading permit. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective construction cost, for those improvements which involve fair -share responsibility that must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash in lieu of construction may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by the Applicant and City Engineer, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 49. The on -site grading plan shall be prepared by a register civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the grading permit. 50. The Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on the Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during grading of the site and construction of the improvements to insure compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant and charged with the compliance responsibility shall make the following certifications upon completion of construction: A. All grading and improvements were properly monitored by qualified personnel during construction for compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances and thereby certify the grading to be in full compliance with those documents. B . The finished building pad elevations conform with the approved grading plans. 51. Storm water run -off produced in 24 hours by a 100 year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless the Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with CONAPRVL.009 8 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 52. The Applicant shall have a focused master drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm water disposal facilities are needed to protect the site from flooding by off site storm water. If the drainage study recommends the construction of off site storm water disposal facilities, the Applicant shall participate in the cost of the facilities, on a fair share basis. The tributary area to be studies includes all tributary land south of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, east of the Bear Creek Channel and west of Washington Street. 53. Applicant shall install a trickling sand filter and leach field in the retention basin to percolate nuisance water in conformance with requirements of the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 160 gallons per day per 5000 s . f . of landscaping. 54. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 55. The Applicant shall participate in the cost of the designing and installing street improvements. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and adopted Standard Drawings, and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name signs, sidewalks, and raised medians where required by City General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with City standards and practices . This includes tapered off site street transitions that extend beyond project site boundaries and join the widened and unwidened street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street ( Calle Tampico to northerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Major Arterial, refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 2. Calle Tampico (Washington Street to westerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Primary Arterial (100 feet right -of -way option) refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 56. The Applicant shall participate in the cost, noted as follows, of designing and installing traffic signals at the following locations: A. Washington Street at Calle Tampico, 25% cost participation. B. Calle Tampico, approximately 550 feet west of Washington Street, 50% cost participation. C. Washington Street, approximately 750 feet north of Calle Tampico, 100% initial cost participation subject to 50% reimbursement when adjacent property to north develops. 57. The Applicant shall construct meandering sidewalk in the parkway and landscaped setback lot along Calle Tampico (6 feet wide) and Washington Street (8 feet wide) . 58. The Applicant shall provide a blank easement that covers the entire landscaped setback lots for the purpose of a meandering public sidewalk. 59. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 60. All existing and proposed electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, and are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 61. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 62. The site shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity, caused by a storm event greater than the 100 year 24 hour event, to flow out of the tract through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the tract shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow for those occasions when a storm greater than the 100 year 24 hour event occurs. CONAPRVL.009 10 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 63. The Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fe amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 64. The Applicant shall design and construct the parking lot in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code Off - Street Parking Ordinance. If the pad locations are proposed to be utilized by eating establishments, the Planning Commission during Plot Plan review shall consider whether adequate off - street parking exists. If it is determined that additional parking is needed, the Planning Commission may require an unused pad to be converted to off - street parking. CONAPRVL.009 11 T H E C I T Y • LA Qyinta TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: 0 F 9- MEMORANDUM MAR 0 9 1992 Planning & Development Department Fred R. Bouma Associate Engineer March 9, 1992 Request for time extension for Plot Plan 91 -456 We request that the following paragraph be appended to the end of condition #42: "Applicant shall execute right -of -way conveyance documents and return them to the city within 30 days after they are furnished to the Applicant by the city." FRB /frb l:l I Y Ut LA UUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION HLE CUPW TICS OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of La Quinta Planning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on April 28, 1992, at 7:00 P.M. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers, 78 -105 Calle Estado, on the following item: ITEM: PLOT PLAN 91 -456 APPLICANT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. REQUEST: APPROVAL OF ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION ON PLOT PLAN WHICH PERMITS 116,500+ SQ. FT. SHOPPING CENTER IN C -P ZONE. LEGAL: APN 769- 030 -007 AND PORTION OF 769 -030 -032. VICINITY MAP HOG N JOTH. AV N N CALLE TAMF4CO ®o _ wrua CNC Z Con" W 21 DURANW The La Quinta City Council previously adopted a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project. Since no changes have occurred, no further assessment is deemed necessary. Any person may submit written comments on the Plot Plan extension to the Planning and Development Department prior to the Hearing and /or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the Plot Plan at the time of the Hearing. If you challenge the decision of this extension in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised either at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning and Development Department at or prior to, the Public Hearing. The proposed file may be viewed by the public Monday through Friday from 8: 00 A. M. until 5: 00 P. M. at the Planning and Development Department, La Quinta City Hall, 78 -099 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- DO NOT PUBLIC BELOW THIS LINE ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ PUBLISH ONCE ON APRIL 17, 1992 { 1 4 r Y I CITY OF LA Q1 �vTA U �LE,J ; PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of La Quinta Planning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on March 12, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers, 78 -105 Calle Estado, on the following item: ITEM: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91 -035, CHANGE OF ZONE 91 -063 PLOT PLAN 91 -456 (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91 -187) ..,.,. APPLICANT: KOENIG COMPANIES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET $ AND CALLE TAMPICO 3 SITE N REQUESTS: APPROVAL OF -A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL; CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R- 2 - *4000 TO C -P (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ® .o...r OR OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE. LEGAL: APN 769 - 030 -007 PORTION OF 769 - 030 -032 uuE UMACO - The La Quinta Planning and Development Department has completed an environmental assessment on the project. Based upon this assessment, the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the - environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The La Quinta Planning Commission will consider recommendation for the adoption of the Negative Declaration along with the project at the Hearing. Any person may submit written comments on the project to the Planning and Development Department prior to the Hearing and /or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption of the Negative Declaration and /or the project at the time of the Hearing. If you challenge the decision of these project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised either at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning and Development Department, at or prior to the Public Hearing. The project file may be viewed by the public Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. at the Planning and Development Department, La Quinta City Hall, 78 -099 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. DO NOT PRINT BELOW THIS LINE PUBLISH ONCE ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991 HNPC . 009. /CS DATE: PROJECT: 0 APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APRIL 3, 1991 PLOT PLAN 91 -456: APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR 116,664 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER COMPLEX THE KOENIG COMPANIES THE NADEL PARTNERSHIP, INC. NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO The proposed project consists of a supermarket, drug store, retail shops, and pad buildings on a 11.8 acre site. The project is scheduled for Planning Commission review at the meeting of April 9th. A General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone is also scheduled for the same meeting. SUBMITTAL: The Applicant has submitted a site plan elevation plans and conceptual landscape plan for the proposed project. No sign plans have yet been submitted. . Color material samples and colored elevations will be available at the meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The architecture of the proposed shopping center is similar in concept to the Village at Indian Wells shopping center located at the corner of Cook Street and Highway 111. The Applicant also constructed the shopping center to the north across Highway 111. The center is Spanish in nature and would utilize exterior cement plaster, ceramic tile accents, clay tile, wood trellis, and a mission clay tile roof. Tower structures which would act as accents would be located near the easterly corner of shop building #4 and at the center of Building #1. The rear elevations of the proposed center utilize mission clay tile roofing only at some corners. The balance of the rear walls are exterior cement plaster with some horizontal pop -out treatments at the top of the parapet and at the extension of bottom of the tile roof. Staff feels that due to the residential zoning and future uses which are likely to be developed on these properties, that additional architectural treatment should be provided. At the rear of the drug store, market, and shop #1, additional tile roofing should be provided. STAFFRPT.046 ,,1 A conceptual landscaping plan has been submitted for the project. The plans indicates proposed trees to be used. The trees are generally water efficient. The ground covers and shrubs have not yet been identified. Date Palm trees are utilized adjacent to the entries to highlight entrance points and at the front of the main building. The other trees are utilized throughout the site. Mounding is provided adjacent to Washington Street and Calle Tampico. Additionally, a short screen wall is provided adjacent to parking lot areas along the streets. Turf is utilized along the perimeters of the street frontages. In these areas the Applicant indicates that landscaping through the use of trees would be provided to screen the flat wall areas. However, the site plan does not provide adequate planting areas to provide the screening, in the opinion of Staff. Two loading areas will be provided, one for the market and one for the drug store. A screen wall is indicated adjacent to these loading areas. Staff would offer the following comments regarding the project: 1. A detailed complete sign program will need to be approved by the. Design Review Board prior to issuance of the first sign permit. The sign program shall include any identification signs for the shopping center. 2. The architecture, materials, and colors of the pad buildings shall be architecturally compatible (i . e. , identical architecture and/or materials) with the main shopping center buildings. 3. The cement plaster texture used on the buildings should be of a decorative nature. 4. Additional architectural treatment through the extension of the tile roof should be provided around the rear sides of the building in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties. 5. There is a relatively large amount of turf used adjacent to the street frontages. 6. The landscaping will have to comply with all requirements as indicated in the off street parking requirements. This includes the requirement for 50% tree shading of the parking lot area. 7. The off street parking requirements also require established shopping cart storage areas. These will have to be provided on the site. 8. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific tree, shrub, and ground covers should be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of the final landscaping plan. 9. There should be additional landscape planting provided adjacent to the fronts of the buildings. STAFFRPT.046 2 10. .Water efficient irrigation systems including bubblers and emitters should be utilized wherever possible. 11. Landscaping adjacent to the north and west should be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with the adjacent residentially zoned properties. 12. Meandering sidewalks will need to be provided adjacent to Washington Street and Calle Tampico. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Design Review Board review the plans in light of the above comments and if deems acceptable, recommend approval to the Planning Commission subject to all' conditions deemed necessary. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Plot plan, elevation, and landscaping plans STAFFRPT.046 3 - CA.0 L E TA MP/CO ' CASE Na CASE MAP GPA 91 -035 PP 91 -456 CZ 91 -063 LOCATION MAP I a .r= N NTS r r v TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II. PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2 CHAPTER III. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 8 CHAPTER IV. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 9 CHAPTER V. RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION 12 CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSIONS AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 15 APPENDIX A RECORD FILE SEARCH REPORT, and BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REGIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS APPENDIX B RESUME OF PRINCIPAL ARCHAEOLOGIST u r r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A cultural resources survey to identify and assess cultural resources on the 9.33 acres of La Quinta Village Shopping Center property located in the City of La Quinta was undertaken by The Keith Companies Cultural Resources Division. An intensive field reconnaissance found no archaeological resources or historical land- marks to exist on the project property, and none had been previously recorded there. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed development of the La Quinta Village Shop- ping Center tract will have no definable direct or indirect effect on any recognized cultural resources, and no specific planning considerations are warranted in this regard. There are, however, a number of recorded archaeological sites nearby, so this region is considered a sensitive area for archaeological resources. Under CEQA (P.R.C. 21083.2i), the City "may make provisions for archaeological sites accidentally discovered during con- struction." The City may require that an archaeological monitor be retained during the grading operations to evaluate and coordinate the recovery of any significant archaeologi- cal resources uncovered. center ,..sC Diug �.� •:� ,� (619)564 2270 PF -, .... ...... ..:....... �.,� n�E�rc: i0.4fn.7Nif5. �: ••r ct`.1�.1T ., .�.�.. ,. .,....: ;f ..�: ,. .C.c..;C u.. 1NQ1dN :L'ELLS �,'' �• „s. _ CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared at the request of The Koenig Companies. Under their authorization of 22 February 1994, The Keith Companies Cultural Resources Division undertook a cultural resources survey to locate and assess any cultural resources located on their 9.33 acre property, the tract being proposed as La Quinta Village Shopping Center, in the City of La Quinta. This report describes the cultural resources survey of the tract. No archaeological sites or historical landmarks were found to exist on the property. Thus, the proposed development of the tract will have no definable direct or indirect effect on any recognized cultural re- sources, and no specific planning considerations are warranted for known cultural re- sources. There are, however, a number of recorded archaeological sites nearby, so this region is consider a sensitive area for archaeological resources. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (P.R.C. 21083.2i), the City may require that an archaeological monitor be present during the grading operations to coordinate the recover of any archaeo- logical resources uncovered. This report follows the procedures for addressing cultural resources planning considera- tions required under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (P.R.C. 21000 et seqq.) and as amended for archaeology in 1982 (P.R.C. 21083.2), as stipulated in the State C.E.O.A. Guidelines, ADnendix K. " Archaeological Impacts." This report conforms to the procedures recommended by the Society for California Archaeology, "Recommended Procedures For Archaeological Impact Evaluation" (1976), and those recommended by the State of California Office of Historic Preservation, "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR); Recommended Contents and Format" (1989). This investigation also complies with the Federal guidelines (36 CFR 60 and 36 CFR 800) to conform with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89 -665; 16 U.S.C. 470) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91 -190; 42 U.S.C. 4321 - 4327). This cultural resources survey program was conducted by and this report was prepared by Paul G. Chace, Ph.D., Director of The Keith Companies Cultural Resources Division (TKC). Dr. Chace has been certified since 1977 as a member of the Society of Professional Archaeologists (S.O.P.A.). Mr. Brant Brechbiel of The Keith Companies Cultural Re- sources Division assisted in the report production. CHAPTER II PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Location The tract being proposed for La Quinta Village Shopping Center is located at the north- western comer of the intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico, in the City of La Quinta. The project tract is directly north from and across Calle Tampico from the La Quinta Civic Center. This property is a portion of the southeast. quarter of the northwest quarter of the Section 6 in Township 6 South, Range 7 East. The general location is shown in Figure 1, reproduced from the U.S.G.S. La Quinta quad map, edition of 1959 photore- vised to 1980. The project property is an irregularly shaped parcel of 9.33 acres. The tract has a frontage of approximately 687 feet along Washington Street and a frontage of approximately 712 feet along Calle Tampico. The specific boundaries for the tract are shown in Figure 2. The property is bounded on the northern side by an undeveloped tract, with the modern levee deflecting the Bear Creek drainage and protecting the City of La Quinta further to the north. To the east across Washington Street is a walled residential tract. Across Calle Tampico to the south is the recently constructed La Quinta Civic Center. Along the west boundary of the project tract, just off the property, a underground sewer line has been installed by the Coachella Valley Water District. Two panoramic views across the property are shown in Figures 3 and 4, looking south and looking north over the project property. The tract to the west of the project area now is vacant land with a row of tall Tamarisk trees. The U.S.G.S. map of 1959 indicates three buildings then existing where these protec- tive trees remain. The revised 1980 edition of the U.S.G.S. map indicates only a single structure then remained, the southern most building nearest the street. This last building has been cleared from this adjacent property in recent years. Near the trees are several scatters of domestic household debris dating from the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. Probably associated with the buildings that existed to the west, an abandoned water well and metal tank are situated in the north center portion of the project tract. A "PEERLESS PUMP" and four -inch iron discharge pipe are present on a cement pad. The pipe is at- tached to a fifteen -foot long, four -foot diameter metal water tank. The tank has the metal label of the "NATAMCO TANK CO." of Los Angeles, California. The label is stamped to indicate that it was manufactured in 1951. (These water facility features, therefore, are not old enough to be considered of historical importance.) An electrical power pole which provided electrical service to the pump has been abandoned and has fallen over nearby. The water line leadin* from the tank is no longer evident, and if any of the nearby land was ever in agriculture, it is not otherwise evident within the project tract. The proposed site plan for the development of this tract is shown in Figure 5. The pro- posed development plan includes a Ralphs Market and Major Drug Store, plus satellite shops and parking facilities. 2 �,,;, ;u' ✓,�,, (�1 �n ^ ��� i W;owell- `........... \'� �� `✓ i 1 ��I I I iii o C Won I, I `�•_-• . ,, �; � �.�I 1 � �'�:. `'' , it : � , �, - 4 z•.�. a 31- No 32 �I(\ G� r✓' Water � •� • ;` • • t S` u \, water Wen well . U ,. .. o I l / V 11 I� u A 1 n u u p R q O We II II � < 00 . -.... I t Wai9 U R M 3B p at a n II � 6e n 1 I Well �� \: t7 • 3 60 . I . • Ali Pump. MI, o La Ql11IIt8 Or . -. . ll I .I ;W ! `.- I I • II I •I . l �,'(I� �1�� 11! `� ��J� %\���� kk Figure 1. General location of La Quinta Village Shopping Center property, as shown on the U.S.G.S. La Quinta quad map, edition of 1959 photorevised to 1980. Scale 1" l = 2000'. Figure 2. Specific boundaries of La Quinta Village Shopping Center property. D 2 J ti w IA N w Al N 489691384E �1 N el" 00'24'M 186.66 = W 1111.00 a N 11919' 136' E o N _ ee.1a o a N 00'00'24'w z 64.00 N a9959'388E 0 288.80 ►� °o N 99'99'38'H 90' ! = 2110.00 = 9.331 AC. NET N 440513'490E 32.32 N e8908'02'E 712.96 CALLE TAMPICO Figure 2. Specific boundaries of La Quinta Village Shopping Center property. .�. .. .. f.. q:• � ~fit {��i,. '.::Slii. y.. �y"Y -v+Ml� -R� .. r'd S:J,1 ..: :F i.M1 � •� � .. "J S. Figures 3 and 4. Looking south over the project tract toward the intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico with the La Quinta Civic Center in the background, and looking north across the property. IfM.s PAD Y r NOT A PART •�'00°'j' 2-W ACM © M O I km�I U I 940P ND s »J PAD 'C 1 T"IFT Q 94" u. ? M ( \ \�\ � \�\ ��� .ate. -► ® i u.•a u. i A /. " O 1 \�1 +r SHOP — PAD B NO.i � \ \ — s.�eo v. """ r •ir _ r �^ Ji- PAD A ' o ,' Q® .ill 1 1 I T 1• (1 �.f0� t). °o 1 1 O O I �• Ill � I if rw CALLE TAMPICO - I 0 J 40 Figure 5. The proposed site development plan for the project tract including a super- market and drug store, plus satellite shops and parking facilities. Modern Geougg The pro''ect tract is a portion of the wide flood plain formed at an elevation of about +40 to +30 feet (above mean sea level) across the foot of the natural sloping alluvial fan of the Bear Creek drainage. The original community of La Quinta was developed across the gently sloping alluvial fan just above and southwest of the project area. The old northeast- erly trending drainages across the fan were channelized with levees to protect the town area from flooding. Before the community of La Quinta was developed, the project area was within the system of sandy -silty drainage channels flowing along the foot of the fan and southeastwardly onto the desert floor of the Coachella basin, as shown on the U.S.G.S. Indio 30' quad map of 1901, Figure 6. Now, with paved streets and modern drainage systems in place, the project area appears as a nearly level tract on the flat desert floor. The modern Bear Creek levee and channelized drainage now is about 700 feet to the north of project area. Prehistoric Geography For most of the last two millennia, the basin of the Coachella Valley has been inundated by prehistoric Lake Cahuilla, an immense lake that extended about 105 miles in length through the valley basin. This valley basin lake, on the western side of the Colorado River delta, was filled by the river's annual flood discharge. The lake filled the valley basin to a height of +40 above mean sea level and created beachline features at this elevation along the margins of the valley. One such set of natural beachline features is the natural truncat- ed foot along the +40 contour of the sloping alluvial fan of the Bear Creek drainage, and the wide flat flood plain (or lake bottom) just below this contour (where the project proper- ty is located). When Lake Cahuilla filled the valley basin, the lake resources included abundant fishes, wildfowl, marsh plants, etc., which supported many aboriginal villages around the lake's shoreline. About A.D. 1,500 the lake basin dried up rather suddenly when the Colorado River altered its course to the other side of its deltic cone and its flow discharged directly into the Gulf of California. Much of the aboriginal population dispersed. Some people remained and adjusted their life -ways to the local desert resources, occupying settlements in the lake basin and in the surrounding mountains. In historic times these desert people have been known as the Cahuilla Indians. Soils and Biota The soil cover over the project tract is a light gray colored silty sand. This soil now sup- ports various grasses and shrubs, including a few low mesquite bushes. This vegetation cover remains in the southeastern half of the property. The northern and western portions of the tract have been brushed and cleared during recent construction projects, as have the margins of the property along the recently improved streets. While not rich in resources, in prehistoric times after the lake receded, the area might have been harvested for seed foods (such as mesquite beans) and utilized for hunting small animals, particularly cottontails and birds. Ge to The silty sands now covering the project area are alluvium. Beneath the surface soils, some of the finer silts may be lacustrine, having formed in the shallow margins of prehistoric Lake Cahuilla. These soils have weathered and been transported from the surrounding ridges and mountains. These nearby rugged ridges are composed of granitic and metamor- phic rocks. As part of the Santa Rosa Mountains, these rocky highlands form the western side of the Coachella Valley. The drainages along this inland side of the mountains flow generally easterly into the Whitewater River and then southerly into the Coachella Valley basin. 0 CHAPTER III METHODS OF INVESTIGATION The methods employed for this investigation included: 1 a review of previously filed records at the State's archaeological inventory center, 2 a comprehensive field reconnaissance over the surface of project property, and 3 a review of the existing archaeological and historical literature of the region. Previously Recorded Archaeology A review of previously recorded archaeological and historical sites in the region and ar- chaeological reports for the area was conducted at the Regional Information Center of the State's California Archaeological Inventory, housed at the University of California, River- side. This institutional record search was conducted on February 24, 1994. A copy of the records search report is provided as Appendix A. No sites had been recorded on the project property, but a cultural resources survey of the project area had not previously been conducted. However, the available records for the region demonstrate that this is a sensitive archaeo- logical area. Twenty -six sites are known within one mile of the project. These known sites are summarized in the chapter on results. None of these recorded sites are within a quar- ter mile of the project tract. Field Reconnaissance Following the review of previously filed records, the entire project property was traversed on foot in a systematic series of transects to locate and assess any archaeological resources present. The transects were spaced about 15 to 20 meters apart, and the zones between the transects were carefully scanned. Ground visibility was generally excellent, except in the southeastern quarter of the tract. Throughout most of the property, the natural growth had been cleared in recent seasons, and 90% of the ground surface was visible. The natural growth of grasses and shrubs remaining the southeastern quarter of the property covered an estimated 75% to 90% of the ground surface. However, even in this area there were sufficient patches of open ground and exposed areas along numerous animal trails and several roadways to insure that no major archaeological midden deposit was missed. The field survey was conducted on February 23, 1994. A total of two person -hours were ex- pended on the field reconnaissance. Existing Regional Literature An overview of the regional archaeological and historical literature provided the back- ground information contained in the following chapter of this report. This chapter summa- rizes current archaeological knowledge and the cultural traditions represented in the re- gion, as well as unresolved problems of information and interpretation which give signifi- cance to the heritage resources which might be encountered. No reference was found to any published archaeological sites or historical landmarks on the project property. 10 CHAPTER IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HILQTORiCAL BACKGROUND An overview of the existing archaeological and historical literature for the region is pre- sented in graphic form in Figure 7. The past societies that have occupied the western region of Riverside County are represented by cultural patterns in the archaeological record and by historical landmarks. The evidence for the very ancient occupations in southern California, before 9,000 B.C., is meager and controversial. Proposals for a Wisconsin Glacial Age Bi -Polar Tool Tradition, a Paleo- Indian Tradition, and for skeletal remains of Ancient Coastal People have been presented by various scientists. However, the validity and significance of the evidence has been disputed. Many of the chemical dating techniques employed in determining ancient dates have been shown to yield spurious results, and the basic claims for many of these very early finds have been withdrawn. Sites elsewhere in the Americas raise the possibility that very ancient occupation sites could be preserved in favorable geological situations. The San Dieguito Tradition people are recognized as early hunters occupying lakeside and streamside camps. Their camps are common in the deserts to the east and in San Diego County, but they rarely have been recognized in western Riverside County. Their tool assemblages are distinctive, primarily sharp -edged scrapers and long knives. It now seems apparent that this tradition emerged in the Great Basin, but the cause for its apparent late flourishing in southern California and its subse4uent disappearance remain a mystery. The remains of Encinitas Tradition settlements appear about 7,000 B.C. throughout coastal southern California. This society was focused on the gathering of plant foods and shellfish. A diversity of hunting and fishing pursuits were modestly pursued, but little of the equip- ment required is archaeologically preserved. Cobble handstones and milling platforms are the characteristic tools encountered, while sharp -edged tools of flaked stone are few and notably simple. A late phase of this tradition occurs inland, away from the coast, where most camp sites were occupied only after 2,000 B.C. The apparent simplicity of the tech- nology, its persistence, and the many known sites imply a very successful adaptation to seasonal food resources. The specific food utilized, the strategies employed, and the cause of the apparent population shift inland have not been established as yet. The Campbell (Pinto) Tradition people were a society of desert hunters who apparently migrated to the coast. Their campsites exist around lakes, along inland streams, and along the coast from Santa Barbara southward to northern Baja California. Campbell Tradition sites are marked by numerous bones of land or sea mammals, large projectile points typi- cally made in a side - notched style, and a variety of hunting and seed milling equipment. A co- existence in some regions with Encinitas Tradition people seems proven; but the ulti- mate merging, evolution, or extinction of this cultural tradition remains to be investigated. 11 The Shoshonean Tradition appears as one or more migrations of desert peoples who moved towards the coast and developed diverse economies of hunting, gathering, and coastal fishing. People of this tradition occupied the villages along the northern ��d west- ern beachlines of prehistoric Lake Cahuilla. Archaeological sites of this tradition are very numerous and indicate the presence of many populated villages and specialized satellite camps. The cultural remains vary and reflect the particular activities pursued at each loca- tion. Characteristic items are small arrow points, shell ornaments, and mortars for process- . Pottery became a part of this tradition in the Riverside County area. The diversity and flexibility in economies seemingly led to population increases, enhanced trade, and elaborations in social and olitical structures, which, in turn, resulted in increas- ingly greater complexities in archaeological remains. The Hakatayan Tradition emerged along the Colorado River as a society of horticulturists and food gathers. It spread westward into the deserts and into coastal San Diego County, and it may have assimilated with the earlier Encinitas Tradition. The tradition is archaeo- logical characterized by the manufacture of pottery, but it also includes small arrow points and numerous other tools. Some early sites of the tradition occur in Riverside County, but south of Riverside County there are numerous late Hakatayan Tradition villages and satel- lite activity camps with various arrays of equipment, ornaments, and ceramics. The diverse patterns of the seasonal economies with people moving to special activity camps from central villages remain challenging to reconstruct, as are the social interactions with neigh- boring Shoshonean Tradition peoples. Hakatayan and Shoshonean groups appear to have surged northward and westward as the resources of vast Lake Cahuilla, which filled the Coachella Valley, dried up about A.D. 1,500. Even Shoshonean settlements as far north as the Santa Ana River were affected. The Explorer Incidents of the historic period are principally the Coronado expedition and the Cabrillo exploration of 1540 and 1542. The era ends with the exploration party of Portola in 1769 -70 which founded the coastal missions, the 1772 Fages reconnaissance through western Riverside County, and the four parties led by Anza in 1774 -76 establishing a trail across the territory from Arizona to the coast. The full impact of these events on native society and the archaeological record has received scant attention. The Colonial Spanish Mission Era introduced a Hispanic cultural tradition to the region with adobe architecture, agriculture, cattle herding, and new crafts. This historic contact greatly reduced the native Hakatayan and Shoshonean populations, and subsequent ac- counts of the native lifeways are often incomplete or greatly altered. The Mexican Ranch Pastoral Era expanded Hispanic cattle raising and ranch settlements throughout the southern California. Investigations at rural ranch sites reflect diverse populations and demonstrate a mixture of local crafts items mixed with worldly imported goods. The Landless Indian Era reflects the adjustments of shifting settlements and economic pursuits of disrupted native populations following the incursion of Hispanic and An to ranching. Although historically documented, only a few-local archaeological sites of this era have been studied. The Indian Reservation Era is marked with the formal creation of reservations. These lands have provided bases for the continuation into the present of traditional customs. For the ongoing American Development Era with 'ts poly- ethnic society, no single descrip- tion presents a comprehensive depiction. Rapidly changing cultural patterns linked into expanding world- system economies characterize this era. 13 CHAPTER V RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION This survey invest *ation found no archaeological sites or historical landmarks actually located on the La 6uinta Village Shopping Center property. There are a number of ar- chaeological sites recorded in the nearby area, but none of these known sites are within a quarter -mile of the project tract. No sites associated with this property were noted in the literature. The intensive field reconnaissance found no archaeological resources or historic sites in the project area. Previous Archaeological Investigations There are reports on file of 25 archaeological investigations that have been conducted within one mile of the project area, and 26 archaeological site locations have been record- ed in this area. A bibliographical listing of these regional survey reports is provided as Appendix A. Only about half of the land within a mile radius of the project actually has been surveyed for archaeological resources. The recorded archaeoloocal sites known in the nearby region are listed in Table 1; overall, they suggest the following local picture of prehistoric land -use and settlement patterns. This region was intensively occupied in the last millennium, as pottery is typical found in the local occupation sites. No earlier sites representing more ancient traditions have been recognized in the nearby area. Two nearby zones probably represent major lake shoreline settlements occupied when prehistoric Lake Cahuilla existed, one area to the south and one to the northeast of the project property. Several isolated small camps in the desert sand dunes probably represent mesquite gathering camps. The sites recorded as RIV -296, -1179, =2826, -2627, -2828 are close together along the northwestern edge of the old beachline of prehistoric Lake Cahuilla. They probably are different portions of a single large and somewhat dispersed village settlement with several outlying work stations. With the development of the historic community of La Quinta over this same area, other portions of this prehistoric settlement undoubtedly existed but have been obscured. The small camp sites individually recorded as RIV -1180, -1182, -1980, -2997, -2998, -2999, -3000, -3001,.-3002, -3143, -3144, -3868, -3868, -4114 are all very close together in a series of sand dunes just above the northeastern edge of the old beachline of prehistoric Lake Cahuilla. They probably represent an important camping or settlement area for gathering both mes uite and lake resources, as fish bone and shellfish remains are present in a number of these camps. , Additionally, several isolated small camps are known in the sandy dunes well above the old lake shoreline. Typically these camps have pottery sherds, so they too were occupied in the last millennium. These dune camps often are associated with surviving mesquite trees, and mesquite seed pods were harvested as an important aboriginal food. In t& immediate region, no known sites are recorded in the dunes formed in the old lake bottom, but such sites do occur in other regions of the Coachella Valley basin. 14 Table 1. Archaeological Sites Recorded within One Mile of the Project. RIV -151 Camp in sand dunes Pottery and stone tools RIV -158 Camp in sand dunes Pottery by mesquite bush RIV -296 Village above beachline Pottery, stone tools, cremation RIV -1179 Village above beachline Pottery, tools, cremations RIV -1180 Village above beachline Pottery, stone tools, fish bones RIV -1182 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, stone tools, shell RIV -1980 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, cremation, fish, shell RIV -1981 Isolated camp in dunes Pottery, burned rock RIV -1982 Isolated camp in dunes Pottery RIV -1983 Isolated camp in dune Pottery, stone tools, RIV -2826 Bedrock milling station Bedrock mortar & slicks RIV -2827 Village above beach Pottery, stone tools, fish, shell RIV -2828 Bedrock milling station Bedrock metates RIV -2997 Camp in sand dunes Pottery RIV -2998 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, stone tool RIV -2999 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, stone tool RIV -3000 Camp in sand dunes Pottery RIV -3001 Camp in sand dunes Pottery RIV -3002 Camp in sand dunes Pottery RIV -3143 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, tools, food bone, shell RIV -3144 Camp in sand dune Pottery, cremation, burned rock RIV -3321 Isolated camp in dunes Pottery, tools, burned rock, shell RIV -3322 Isolated camp in dune Pottery, stone tools, burned rock RIV -3868 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, shell, tool RIV -3882 Camp in sand dunes Pottery RIV -4144 Camp in sand dunes Pottery, stone tools, shell 15 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No cultural resources were found to exist on the 9.33 acre tract proposed for the U Quinta Village Shopping Center. No archaeological sites previously-had been recorded on the property, and no prehistoric sites or historical landmarks were noted in the literature for the region. There are a goodly number of recorded archaeological sites within the nearby region. It is probable that this property was visited and utilized for gathering and hunting by people from nearby settlements in prehistoric times. However, it was never utilized intensively enough to produce a permanent archaeological record on the land, or else such evidence has been obliterated by subsequent erosion and land alterations. It is being proposed that this tract would be development as a commercial shopping center, as shown in Figure 5. The proposed development plan includes a Ralphs Market and Major Drug Store, plus satellite shops and parking facilities. It is not anticipated that this proposed project would impact any recognized cultural re- sources in the region. Is it .proposed, therefore, that no further specific planning consider- ations to mitigate direct impacts to known cultural resources are warranted. There are, however, a number of recorded archaeological sites nearby so this region is consider a sensitive area for archaeological resources. Under CEQA (P.R.C. 21083.2i), the City "may make provisions for archaeological sites accidentally discovered during con- struction." The City may require that a trained archaeological monitor be present during the grading operations to evaluate and coordinate the recovery of any archaeological resources uncovered. Indirect impacts from the proposed project upon cultural resources in the surrounding region are not anticipated but are possible. Although there are no significant archaeologi- cal sites recorded near the property, unrecognized and unrecorded sites may still exist, particularly in areas yet to be surveyed. However, nearby properties are not subject to effective protective measures in connection with the presently proposed project. It is proposed, therefore, that no further planning considerations to mitigate such indirect impacts are warranted. 16 APPENDIX A RECORD FILE SEARCH REPORT, and BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REGIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS California Archaeological Inventory Eastern Information r.pntpr Dr. Paul Chace Keith Companies 2955 Red Hill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Eastern Information Center Department of Anthropology University of California INYO MONO Rivers:!-,'g, CA 92521 %I RIVERSIDE {44) 787 -5745 Re: La Quinta 9.33 Acre Rush Records Search Dear Dr. Chace: February 24, 1994 RS #1550 We received your request on February 22, 1994 for a cultural resources records search for the property designated "La Quinta 9.33 survey," located in Section 6, T.6S., R.7E., SBBM, near the community of Myoma in Riverside County. We have reviewed our site records, maps, and manuscripts against the location map you provided. Our records indicate that a cultural resources survey has not been conducted on the subject property. Twenty -five cultural resources survey reports are available that are adjacent to or within a one -mile radius of the subject property. These reports are listed on the attachment entitled "Archaeological Reports" and are available upon request at $0.15 /page plus $7.50 per 1/2 hour xeroxing fee. The KEYWORD section of each citation lists the geographic area, quad name, listing of trinomials (when identified), report number in our manuscript files (MF #), and the number of pages per report. No archaeological sites are known within the project boundaries; however, our records indicate that twenty -six archaeological sites have been recorded within a one mile radius of the project area. Copies of the site records are included for your study needs. The above information is reflected.on the enclosed map. Areas that are shad- ed in yellow indicate areas that have been surveyed. Numbers in pencil indi- cate the report number in our manuscript files (MF #). Areas in red show the location of cultural resources, and their corresponding numbers in black represent the state trinomial. In addition to the California Archaeological Inventory, the following were reviewed: A. The National Register.of Historic Places, Vol. I and II, and subsequent Federal Register Listings: None of the properties or sites are listed. Dr. Chace . February 24, 1994 Page 2 National Register Determinations of Eligibility (listed through August 1993): Determinations have been made on the following sites and properties: CA -RIV -3321 Evaluated 01/12/88 Program Ref.: BLM871228C Status 2: Determined Eligible The rest of the sites and properties have not been evaluated. B. A review of early USGS topographic maps of the area, Indio 30' (surveyed in 1901) and the General Land Office plat map (T.6S., R.7E., 1856) indicated no historic features in the project area. The old road to Indian Wells appears on both maps and is located near the subject property. Copies of the maps are included for your information. This statement does not constitute a negative declaration of impact. This statement reports only known archaeological materials on or in the vicinity of the property in question. The presence of cultural resources on the property cannot be ruled out until a systematic survey is conducted. For further information on historic resources, please contact Diana Seider, Riverside County Historian, at (909) 275 -4310. As the Information Center for Inyo, Mono and Riverside Counties, J t is neces- sary that we receive a copy of all archaeological reports and site informa- tion pertaining to these counties in order to maintain our map and manuscript files. Site location data provided with this records search are not to be used for reports unless the information is within the project boundaries. This information is confidential. If you have any further questions, please feel free to phone us at (909) 787- 5745. Sincer ly, W ffit Information Officer enclosures , ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB /Query Printed: 02/24/94 Page: 001 JERTBERG, PARTICIA AND NANCY FARRELL 1980 A STUDY OF LATE PREHISTORIC SUBSISTENCE AND SETTLEMENT PATTERNS ALONG THE NORTHWESTERN SHORELINE OF LAKE CAHUILLA: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SALVAGE PROJECT OF SITES CA -RIV -119, 158, 1180, 1838. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION. SUBMITTED TO COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 143 PP (7), CA -RIV -0119 (8), CA -RIV -1180 (8), CA- RIV -1838 (8), CA -RIV -0158 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0204 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED - EXCAVATION ONLY (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BERRYMAN, STANLEY R. 1977 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EXCAVATION CHANNEL FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY. TOUPS CORPORATION, LA JOLLA CA. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE ( COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT). UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 120 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 33 PP (7), CA-RIV -1180 (8), CA-RIV-0119 (8), CA-RIV -1178 (8), CA-RIV-0208 (8), CA- RIV -1770 (8), CA- RIV-0158 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #0204 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DROVER, CHRISTOPHER 1987 CULTURAL RESOURCES ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION, THE GROVE, LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(S).. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 58 PP (7), CA- RIV-1838 (8), CA -RIV -3321 (8), CA-RIV -3322 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0304 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED - EXCAVATION ONLY (4) ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE 1985 LETTER REPORT: REASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES*ON THE LA QUINTA SCHOOL SITE. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 3 PP (7), CA -RIV -1180 (8), CA -RIV -1980 (8), CA-RIV -1981 (8), CA -RIV -1982 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0304 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED- RECONNAISSANCE ONLY (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BOWLES, LARRY AND JEAN SALPAS 1980 MITIGATION OF THE ATO SITES - PHASE I. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 58 PP (7), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0304 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED EXCAVATION ONLY (4), YES RESOURCES (8) ------------------------------------ 3ST.- J------ 3---- 33' ST-- 3-' 13-- 3-- 3-----== 3-- 33- 3- 'J- 33--- 3---- 3------ 3---- - - - - -- ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB /Query Printed: 02/24/94 Page: 002 BOWLES, LARRY L. 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - NEAR LA QUINTA, COACHELLA VALLEY. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 13 PP (7), 700 ACRES SURVEYED (4), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #0304 (6), UNKNOWN RESOURCES (8) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VAN HORN, DAVID AND M.J. AASVED 1979 SURFACE COLLECTION AND TEST EXCAVATION AT RIV -151 IN LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 100 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 123 PP (7), CA-RIV-0151 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0451 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOLCOMB, THOMAS 1979 RESULTS OF TEST EXCAVATION AND SURFACE COLLECTION OF A PORTION OF CA -RIV -712, NEAR LAKE ELSINORE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (TPM 12990). ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, UCR. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 9 PP (7), CA-RIV -0712 (8), CISMONTANE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (4), LAKE ELSINORE 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0572 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LANDO, RICHARD 1979 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECONNAISSANCE (STAGE II) OF FLOOD CONTROL ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED FOR THE WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. CONTRACT NO. DACW09 -79-M -1034. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: RECONNAISSANCE--WINDSHIELD SURVEY (4), 47 PP (7), BEAUMONT 7.51 QUAD (4), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), INDIO 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #0578 (6), NO RESOURCES (8), NORTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4), RANCHO MIRAGE 7.5' QUAD (4), WHITEWATER 7.51 QUAD (4), UNKNOWN ACREAGE SURVEYED (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JERTBERG, PATRICIA 1981 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SALVAGE INVESTIGATIONS OF CA-RIV -1180, LOCUS H AND OTHER LOCI, ON TENTATIVE TRACT 14325. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 82 PP (7), CA -RIV -1180 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51.QUAD (4), MF #0647 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED - DATA RECOVERY ONLY (4) --------- ---------- -- - - -- ---- ----- - - - - -- ------ --- ------ --- ----- - - - - -- - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- . 1' , • = or_ aaaxr_ aaaaaea�aa_ aaaaa _as.aaaa= _aaaaaaaaaaxaaa =aa_aa_ aria= aasaaeoaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaasa =saaaaaaaaaraaaaaaa ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NAOB /Query Printed: 02/24/94 Page: 003 ===== aa°====______________________________= 0=====________=..--°---° �--°¢--- amaaaam ====a•= ====�aaoa== a ===aaa JERTBERG, PATRICIA 1982 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SALVAGE INVESTIGATION OF CA -RIV -1180, LOCUS 11, ON DUNA LA QUINTA PARCEL. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 68 PP (7), CA-RIV -1180 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0647 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED - DATA RECOVERY ONLY (4) SWENSON, JAMES D. 1979 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 125 ACRES BETWEEN AVENUE 50 AND AVENIDA NUESTRA, EAST OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 125 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 9 PP (7), CA -RIV -1180 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #0647 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SWENSON, JAMES D. 1979 INTENSIVE CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF SELECTED AREAS OF THE PROPOSED LA QUINTA FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,-LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. CONTRACT NO. DACW09- 78- MO9862. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 30 ACRES SURVEYED (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), 6 PP (7), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), MF #0651 (6), NO RESOURCES (8), UCRARU #0474 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SALPAS, JEAN A. 1980 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 82 ACRES OF LAND IN LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(3). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 19 PP (7), 82 ACRES SURVEYED (4), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #0823 (6), NO RESOURCES (8) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCIENTIFIC RESOURCE SURVEYS, INC 1980 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT ON THE VISTA IDYLLWILD PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 465 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 5 PP (7), BEAUMONT 7.51 QUAD (4), CABAZON 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #0838 (6), NO RESOURCES (8), NORTHERN PENINSULAR RANGES (4) .a. :3a� a.a�saaaaoaaacaa == saw--_ acaaa_- aa_- axac=3= �a_- a�asa= a_ �a= aarla- 3asa =saa:a_aas- '- '- �- =xsaam= ass =ee ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB /Query Printed: 02/24/94 Page: 004 SUTTON, MARK Q., AND P.J. WILKE (EDITORS), WITH N. FARRELL, W.I. FOLLETT, C.D. KING, K.K. SWOPE, AND R.M. YOHE II 1986 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT LA QUINTA, SALTON BASIN, SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 149 PP (7), CA-RIV -1179 (8), CA- RIV-2827 (8), CA-RIV -2823 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), DATA RECOVERY ONLY (1), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #1948 (6), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED (4), UCRARU #0777 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WILKE, PHILIP J. 1984 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE BURNS RANCH AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES, LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT, U.C. RIVERSIDE. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 61 PP (7), 580 ACRES SURVEYED (4), CA -RIV -1179 (8), CA -RIV -2822 (8), CA -RIV -2823 (8), CA -RIV -2824 (8), CA -RIV -2825 (8), CA -RIV -2826 (8), CA -RIV -2827 (8), CA- RIV-2828 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #1948 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PADON, BETH 1984 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, RIDGWAY / AHMANSON PROJECT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. LARRY SEAMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 30 PP (7), 600 ACRES SURVEYED (4), CA- RIV-2842 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #2005 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PADON, BETH 1984 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT - LA QUINTA HOTEL AND GOLF CLUB, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. LSA, INC. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 400 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 29 PP (7), CA-RIV-2937 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #2038 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PADON, BETH 1985 LETTER REPORT: ADDITIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY WITHIN THE RIDGEWAY/ AHMANSON (XOCHIMELCO) AND LA QUINTA HOTEL AND GOLF COURSE. LSA, INC. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 160 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 5 PP (7), CA-RIV-2999 (8), CA- RIV-3000 (8), CA-RIV -3001 (8), CA-RIV -2998 (8), CA-RIV -2997 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), MF #2122 (6) � � 1 ARCHEOLOGICAL REPORTS NADB /Query Printed: 02/24/94 Page: 005 DROVER, CHRISTOPHER E. 1986 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED ORCHARD HOTEL COMPLEX, LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 120 ACRES SURVEYED (4), 23 PP (7), CA -RIV -3131 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #2214 (6) DROVER, C.E. 1986 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED LA QUINTA YACHT CLUB PROJECT, LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: 15 PP (7), 40 ACRES SURVEYED (4), CA -RIV -1182 (8), CA -RIV -3143 (8), CA-RIV-3144 (8), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), MF #2251 (6) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JERTBERG, PATRICIA AND NANCY FARRELL 1980 A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SALVAGE PROJECT: LA QUINTA EVACUATION CHANNEL. AUTHOR(S). SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: MF #0204 (6), 13 PP (7), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), CA-RIV -0158 (8), CA-RIV -0119 (8), CA -RIV -1180 (8), CA -RIV -1838 (8) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARKUSH, BROOKE S. 1990 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT CA -RIV -1182, CA -RIV -3143, CA- RIV-3144, CA- RIV-3868, AND CA- RIV -3882, TENTATIVE TRACT 25429, LA QUINTA, CENTRAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH UNIT. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: MF #2251 (6), 95 PP (7), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED (4), COACHELLA VALLEY (4), LA QUINTA 7.5' QUAD (4), CA -RIV -1182 (8), CA -RIV -3143 (8), CA -RIV -3144 (8), CA-RIV -3868 (8), CA- RIV -3882 (8) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHITE, LAURIE AND D.M. VAN HORN 1990 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST EXCAVATIONS AT "JM -1 ", CITRUS GOLF COURSE (TT 24890), LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY. ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES. SUBMITTED TO PRIVATE. UNPUBLISHED REPORT ON FILE AT EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER, U.C. RIVERSIDE, CA 92521. Keywords: MF #3364 (6), 62 PP (7), NO ACREAGE SURVEYED (4), CISMONTANE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (4), LA QUINTA 7.51 QUAD (4), CA-RIV-4114 (8) � l (� APPENDIX B RESUME OF PRINCIPAL ARCHAEOLOGIST � • [ I� ,1 1� %A • `#� PAUL G. CHACE, Ph.D., SOPA Director of Archaeology Technical Services • Archaeological Investigations and Reports • Historic Landmark Assessments • Federal 106 and State CEQA Compliance • Heritage Research and Planning Experience Dr. Chace has 16 years experience directing archaeological programs serving the cultural resource management needs of private developers and government agencies. Prior to joining The Keith Companies, Dr. Chace operated an independent archaeological planning firm, serving as the Principal Investigator and organizing archaeological and historical assessments and legal compliance components for land development projects throughout southern California. Dr. Chace has conducted the archaeological programs required for the Valley Center sewer project, for the Las Montanas resort and housing subdivision in San Diego County, for land subdivisions in Riverside, San Diego, and Los Angeles Counties, for General Plan amendments in San Diego County, for Redevelopment Agency projects in the Cities of Banning and San Buenaventura, and for numerous similar projects. His technical reports and management recommendations, addressing the legal aspects of both CEQA and Federal requirements, have been prepared for the planning, review, and permit processes of various governmental agencies, including the State Office of Historic Preservation, the Water Resources Control Board, and the Coastal Commission, plus various counties and cities. For documentation of historical landmarks and heritage sites, Dr. Chace has assessed historic buildings near Lake Elsinore for a Bureau of Reclamation project. For the Bureau of Land Management, he directed the archaeology investigation and site stabilization of the Army's 1860s Fort Piute which protected the old southern desert road into California. At the 1880s Sepulveda Building in Los Angeles' El Pueblo State Park, he directed the archaeological component study for the building restoration and Historic Structure Report. Dr. Chace also has published scholarly descriptions of historic Chinese temples and Chinese community festivals in California. Dr. Chace is a past- president of the Society for California Archaeology and a member of the Society of Professional Archaeologists. In 1982 -1984 he served on the State Legislature's California Heritage Preservation Task Force. Education • Ph.D., University of California, Riverside • M.A., State University of New York, Oneonta • B.A., California State University, Long Beach continued ... N -S6 -93 0 i V/s ��� ��1 `m �r • ��� ® DistincNye Signage since 19131 46120CALHOUN 9 201 (619)347-3566 5.1155 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 345.1155 CONTRACTORS � I LIC. NO. t (��� JOB LOCATION u DRAWN B DESCRIPTION I" M I t`1 AY �D CAP . 1ST G � This Is an original unpublished drawing, for You P IMPERIAL SIGN. n Is submitted a for your personal use In Oonnectlon with a project Is n planned ho you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It Is not 10 be shown 10 anyone out- side your organtution, nor Is It to be repro - duced, copied a echlWtad in any fashion. MEMBER - GTY LIC. NO. ` CUSTOMERMIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. Q J CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME C CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCA T-011. 14j1 LTFZ WT j �� ✓ I I /OIL ESE V�rlo�1 r�Ts CRP -t)I H!✓T: oPPQ0E STtluo Flo. To FIG' t1 fib: oPn�aLl s� FI� q Ta H,&14 f5 -I?&, w7 �Odf P7 00FY: A a UA I /2� to 2� 5Q c 1-U too J e 5 El; E fO LARGED FUS.-O For- 61 G * w s"fl,u'A1Clo0 DIME0610t4s APPROVED LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION BY C DATE -i [ ST ,Lt A-no� Deq;k L_ NITS pE�.a1 510-0. 1m ^`„ rw ��� 1. ■ Co�� . Distinctive Sign (61 since 1961 INDI0,�IL�ORNIfA 922017. (619) ��3568 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. !N 7I 5 � JOB LOCATION u I DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION I �` I , I D N This is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. n is submitted for your personal use In connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out - side your organization, nor Is It to be repro. duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. MEMBER — C111+1111=sKft011111 CITY LIC. NO. i� 22 / CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. I I F,/,,riJ' 2.2� CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME C m r I E-6 CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE �q ca' SCAL � ....,. . , . . ,, . , . -' .. ,. _.x',r!•a++e, •. �;, -- .fir,-- ,--.,� J� Y I r .e ON � D �tl � rr t�Q�a r —9PV� Q��d� �na�� 1Pegn b Ca a y�9 r�9!. rl $7 pp Fi YDf P-' �y�!dY�g m�dao4 6G�h�Rr @Ig;� ��o q ® •,�, ® Q p n.��b � °re �r e� fl OP ad�pp4 ti`N 6AAWAku . 0� t io �R�ab�aaq�u�q�bt�tiP �eE�b�►�Qq off( e. ��f -i'-y— .� �._E..: r. ,. { '.C.�,,.. '+.��.n,�,i. �G:f° � •:. :ei'-,: �,.,..,� F'b... ,,,,,•s4;''..,�. t;�t,. ,' �,. . "x,,;.�. � .�?.c� - 'e•ri.' yt •Y -7'`E 1. �. .5 '.?' �':�::. ''���� �•y:�• r'r.`.. j1�w�,.. .•1 �,a�y "'e:� :�. -� "-�' �;� .:}.. ••, aFa• ?. -. �re i.. �x.�kr - ���•� efiety+� t..x , � .++r,: : f '2•'�'.• 'r �n •tit •s-�'. [� ":?�:. . J �:�. f•;�;f:: `;� ?'.'�:��. �� -"��•' tr :.1r -' ,��i;;" ": _ !� , . •:;�r+:,.w:�°'' '�S � .,+ �:` ':- s: -�Y'' 'ii�. ; t� ,� � � to - : f' � :,�:; ='a F, i.,�Y.+,`.'y� -, ,. t.; ` " � �,- t�•., :.; � .�_'�7 � , '� �`.', '�:a';�''r � 'c'�'si=.s� -._: tom,„ �.. t; •� L1t7Q.- - i.. j $E1 �1379� a:; !'- r,[1^J"+CfQG�Oq ' - _ r i �Q�` Lai - O�OO' `• �� • f •� ®jL]Ca0Lt0Uc7 +�'"7. szsi. �OfH5cr7O0f7 � f I�6IDr:::6�iF �L�Q��❑ 1 �oc°� own i !�- �i? �* OltOO[]DO— ..... .... � moe3orinu .. •,�� O TE-�5 . OrAada M,&rc'- 4 Ew ► Lo �� [r1_rAI R EF_: Ta MATS4 ri � T� M,&14 F�;)Lp�, w7 �,r-2 � T� bi►� G Sim F� �e� 5e� 1 lM ,�e `�� ® ��q1 Distinctive Signage since 1961 )41 46120 CALHOUN ST. (61913473568 INOIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 345-1155 CONTRACTORS UC. NO. 207 I 'PLO 1' - 1 U N JOB LOCATION �" �� DRAWN BY L,L.� DESCRIPTION T� , ' • ` I T /` ( ^ , I '1�'I�p` IN, J vN I /� 1 1 l�11 I ` I f`+L✓T� L�va��)O( D I M �' �S�I O �� TMa is y original SIGN.iIt is submitted for your personal use in connection with ■ for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. n is ion with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out - aide your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exh ibited in any fashion. � MEMBER % I CITY UC. NO. �i.. 22 -/ CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. G Q CUSTOMER/FtRM NAME CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE ' (1 �O 1 se . `� {ft �■ IMP �_ ■ ���. 7V ®��� Distinctive Signage since 1961 16.120 CALNOUN ST. (619) 317 -36 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. so 13tp •/lY j�� JOB LOCATION !� (%� U I t % DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION ►, �y /� I LW M I �A7 � ON5. �I G This Is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted pr your being plat use to connection with a prOJect being planned to( you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out. side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duce", copied or exhibited in any fashion. –' MEMBER — bldtl4q up und" CITY LIC. NO. n �s "` �./ CUSTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. I Ili % n CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE n �J SCALE / �oT�� G*10ET; 1jffAL OVER- AFL IPO�l PAS Teti TO MV"Trl1 P5I.rxy two cow; ki H I Tp,- Iu,UMiN�r�o� ; F-LuOP-EG6E+1r 5IZ1;. 5'Y' 22' L�1�l 1 1� ® � Distinctive T. (5e since 1961 INDIO, CAtL TORN CALHOUN (619) 345 -1155 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 'LG� ; v '(�/� JOB LOCATION C� U I 7/'� DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION I 'ff , `'� J� G� /� I L.J I '�"� CD G�� • °�I t/ This is y original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out - side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in an fashion. P y — MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. "? 2- �+. "' CUSTOM ERIFIRM ADDRESS / I "' DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. I I ��rJ 3�� �{ ' /�' 1/ r!N CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME � ✓'- 'yI V � 0'' I � I � CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE . F,- � F,�- V �,7I,57� 0�=j N OT_��) cAf510E�T; M�TALov� A�� � N PA�NT'Eb To Mr�•TcN �LDC. :Rerc) IL,UMINA -il0J; F-L'Uop- r-.G6 - 51zE:,; '6'y, 2Z' rl �1 `� ��_ ■ llnc-. lc®� Y Distinctive Slpnape since 1961 INDIO, ,120CANAUNST r.1 %s.s1� CONTRACTORS UC. NO. 20� i 3cp ^ ( l�A t1 1� JOB LOCATION L DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION F12� GTANVIOG S TtUS b an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. His submitted e f« -11 Personal use In you by IMPERIAL SIGN. iN. �kn t to be ho n to by IMPERIAL SIGN. H b not to be shown to arryone out. side your organization, nor Is H to be repro. duced, copied or exhibited In any fashion. MEMBER CNN*Bxli VVKAUDMO CITY UC. NO. 'i, �y CUSTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS WING NO. CUSTOMER APPROVAL WORKMANS�CjOMP.. fNO. I' :/ ✓�� CUSTOMFwE1RM NAME I G G L� I ri J PHONE DATE 4-19 -q4. SCALE r 1 A5 -5��j/.vJ'yU� 6IC-44 ELF 11 61PF-,V I C-M H ETA L ovE1?- A 4 GL.e 19-0h4 61106,64' FI I;II �;N To MATco "ev. �Kc��o�.1p; dPAQ�� STtJc.Go FI t� 1 To MAJ-60 19511L4A 0e . Cory - rug- auolse:� N.o .i2 : To M A�fG¢i Ti l,F i L-W M I Nxna : FI.Uo iz _ �I ��� 1� i• �. �w yw■ CO �a• Distinctive Si na a since 1967 9 g 46-12 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 22017 (6191345 1555 CONTRACTORS LI /C.�,NO. Z✓ ' I J �J` , 1 Y JOB LOCATION �A Q u I "1' A DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION�i �j /� This is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out. side your organization, nor is it Y be repro - duced, copied or exhibited in an fashion. MEMBER 1 Elttrft SIRAsmdaUa CITY LIC. NO. �j � CUSTOMER /FIRM ADDRESS K I AWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. 38°I�- Y L CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME �o �� G GoM P� I S CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE 4 -H _q SCALE �� '5 try _I� T(/Vlrl 6 I G� V L E. \/ ATI � I' IYZ =1� 0�i 4-'s I pa'v I C-M M ETA L- 4V159- BAH GL- 19-04 r 51106,60 F101.�N To. MATC. � bLDC-7- r-AC-K-eff Lwr I ey)t�Ul�i 61-dc.00 H � 1 6�f To MATct 1901111LP �G . U4 F-0 00ry; T�I�auois� Ff�TI'01Z' To MATS TI1a I-W MI. Nmno� ; 1� ���. ®���� Distinctive Signage since 1961 16-120 CALH OUN ST. (619) 347.3566 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 3151155 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 2/_ 20 ! I :J� /? JOB LOCATION LA CX �I j� �i'� DRAWN BY —!-7 � DESCRIPTION j, A,� 't`,) F�G F✓ ��A� I�I�Cf ''ID�1� �'r') �j This is an original unpublished w p created by IMPERIAL SIGN. n a submitted for your personal use In connection with e project being t to bed for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It Is not to De shown to anyone out side your organization, nor le It to be repro- duced, copied a exhibited In any fuhlon. MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. �n CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. ?�� I' �4� ✓��� CUSTOMERlfIRM NAME o CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE t '� ��- I �D� F, r-_ l nil I 51 pFV I E�1Xl �OT�/-?: METAL- ovFF- AOGL'E� I fzo� - 5TH FW 60 To MATCH+ 5L-DG. PACK-GFOUNP : orAaue FIA std To MATGN F-Lt-DG. vr/ , RIO dity LEI�RS . CoP -(: -rdIZ U0145F R-ETAJ tQEF-: To MATER TIC u,tatJWkTIOr -' FL.UOF -5ca�r 4orr;:: F-op pot-P6 A) f5' c, P �E�iai Sign 1� 1n� �A�p�r Distinctive Signage since 1961 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 2201T (6181345 -1� CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 2 07 ` I JOB LOCATION LA �LI' d rk DRAWN BY 1j1j DESCRIPTION FR�� ���� �'�,w �D, +t k � �, j.� i �`+ v N U IN' I This is y original PERI l unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. n Is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out. side your organization, nor is it to be repro- dueed, copied or exhibited In any fashion. — MEMBER — y � CITY LIC. NO. /i �% .!r CUSTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS CO�MPP.. NNO. I I D4' ; 2=J 1� CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME � I�,� CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE I 1 ' () =I �D _ I TD f M ET�L ov�iZ A.IJGI.� (Rod - - TUcZo F 0 To MATER 15L -PG. f�ACK%GFoUNp ' O fAigUE; - STUCCO FIOI SH To m4TGN (zo UTC-p L� . coP�: T'�fRaUoi�� F-ETAI►lEf To M .&TC4 TIi.6- II,�LINjIt�P.T�r�I�; �l.Uo(�SG�� N 11 �r,�a� 5 fOi� �� ■ . 1�� Inc. �� Y " ■ ���ems.% 46-120 Distlnctive Signage since 1961 INDIO, CALIFORNHAOUN ST l619)347-3566 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 2 a7 3co JOB LOCATION � �j� DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION DOUBLE FACED /'± SANDBLASTED SIGN N is an original PR unpublished drawing, creaed by personal s SIGN. n is submitted ted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone oul- side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. CUSTOMER /FIRM ADDRESS A DRAWING N0. WORKMANS COMP. jNO. ' I � J V 1 � ",. Y� f K-OCE A[ P G C� ! � n CUSTOMER /FIRM NAME L3 CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE / _ _ Q, — G�q lU v _I _T SCALE / I AJ L,7 0W PERSPECTIVE VIEW NTs ...�y ,p � ., ' ,yob r Ong';. 95,x, �'� a° � +F:.r � _''4q i 'A t b �^ � .o�'1.• 5 t ''r q..r ti� J... �' � � sa-1, • -��& °rz `� S� �"• � � r✓� 2.>x� � Vt ffr'a��� l�' ��' f1•j ' r • QQG s. .0' .7 =F ,3 3 �`r t NOTES: 5Ar t?bLAhTC-,P SIGN W1 F,15EP LTp- 5. ft)s&6I-Gf ouND; To M4,TcH coFfzi na-7F-- Go L.c� Fz cod(: A,s PEA T�.�.;•�"' SIGN FACE 2'' � �T E� f3OFvEz 1 -df5l� G F," ' RAwdi' V Q SIGN DETAIL in= if —0° �, �1� _J�cr 1Mr �' ���s sssrrA�� �� CO�p . Distinctive Sign (61 since 1961 INDIO, CALIFORNIA It 22017 (619) 34513155 CONTRACTORS //LIIC. NO. �7 j �!/ I / JOB LOCATION _ r `� I DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION �� I � �� �� ��� � �I � � This is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out - side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. MEMBER CITY LIC. NO. 2 /i "� CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. CUSTOM ERlFIRM NAME C � r I r� CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE —� SCAL � c t QMa�pgPa�sta�a a REMO 2N ~' j so t tan>immts�a { \ ` t)AN t3 c3"'� � . ..\i✓- 'ilri-" ��:'`3._. ". %�Q 'i',",r���'aq�� � .Q�� 9l� �� �� ��q0� G�L9J6v�r';�BI�R tsQn c. P/ �� py�i 6ai ,f'til�"ry " tl r 4 mryoQp R6`�,y�jf EA ��' q •:. '. :.gi p ®�� �i�� �® QQ na�pGv ti ' ba'. ��o b�ti�ti�aQg� , Qa 04�Q r'81 f® �OQ�"`��1�'� tt� aG�t®'�6��� . elf' �b 4Qb o a �aq Q a f "p �I) a q Gpo ��gof�d"ioG>4�1c1'4(r�hdJti� �1a�pp�Qgti 0 9N�1� VIP- 0- 4:4!'4` a vrn. 'J-%±k•',::.{. . ': y.tl:S.' . 1'�i t , LRpp ].::d.�-�:fev l.... ' +. •Tr :-vi,Y :a :l, �'t]FC�n 'r. - .�"Kv '•�i•d:' s_: . i ¢{:L': wag xx1..s.. iL. . : <: 7 - 1. �, .. ,:.JSe. . '.:�a.' C.eaa:.: • 1_�:9`, R . : ;Y��'i _�`C'-.•t;. x A 1 y` .. 6yr:, s '2.v"}'.�. eJ. ..`:i�.:' ,. . ��'� V`k ' `.%�3 � •.1• P� %$} •' .° .r;�: { L:.:. .i .:.s...., rc• {X� s •''•r". k •:,',: • - %.m' lya< xc,:. ;:5 -i;: :r ..L; .t. r '!i^^.:C ,fir• 1 ;: {r' ': ;4:., � �. - It•. :�.w 5v.. _: �v ^_:` z..:•1 l +.F�.. �..C'. .c. :'�"�5,� .. .. ri:�,'"..J.. :�xi �• :i' � +y �i:'iF';; �; °,�: "? g F:.j�:, S v'ay3'' �`f- JCStrr.:. :li.: r. ":fi.�.::., :Z 7 - ..r���i.r. G' ,�.-,�a. �� ":+Jti i`�.:; .�:`.. �+..��,; •.. �' ��I •.;t., }�� °fie•.. }� ..'�'_s ' . 1'� . L. .•'rte !- r- 7c-- �I�EV�rio�l rlrs MA-rc4 ��,�oI►�� T� MST F::;)L-p6, v-7 12oUr �0 -rd b W C `6 I G � F1 e�� 661 �� ��a ®�Q'�almy r Distinctive Signage since 1981 46120 CALHOUN ST. (819)347.3588 INDIO. CALIFORNIA ti2201 3451155 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 207 I3L% ` 1 I ��� JOB LOCATION A u DRAWN By L�L.� ✓ DESCRIPTION , I, , I 'A'1�0`'y 5 (G ' �i� I I `jT� LL ,& T(O D 1 I� ` v6I O This is an original unpublished drawing, croalou by IMPERIAL SIGN. n is ion with a for your personal use in connection with a SIGN.t11 being ott to De shown ato by anyone side your organization, or is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. MEMSM — CITY LIC. NO. n �i (` CUSTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS — DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. 1 1545 :5wi4 CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE & •7 -1+ SCALE + ( kt =1-O 41 e� QQ�� 1��,. Ompa Distinctive Sipn (61 since 1961 CALIF CALIFORNIA 2ST, (619) 347-3566 INDIO, RNIA 922Dt 345-1 155 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 20713 Lp _,/ JOB LOCATION I� v� U I 1 `�A - DRAWN BY DESCRIPTION ►, A I LW M I �AI � GAD, �I � This Is an original unpublished drawing. created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted for your personal use Inc you by IM with a project being planned for you DY IMPERIAL SIGN. It is nol to be shown to anyone out - side your organizalion, nor is it to be repro. duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. -- MEMBER CITY LIC. NO. 12.2--b CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WOgKMANS CAMP. NO. A ►'�} CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE GATE Q 9+ U SCALE �I.FV�Tidl� �T� �1OT-f'-'b car,)O ET : H f�FA L, ova- .Af4Gt.E Foo 4 PA Teti To t/�-Tc+ 5Lr"<:v cow: kl H tTp,- Z_ C-_: Six 22� ���°�^ ,v)p ® 1��• COMPan 4(x120 CALHOUN SL n ge since 3%6 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 345 -1155 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. �L�L' -7 i� �� HI JOB LOCATION I� Cc �} I I : !�l DRAWN BY �� --'�' DESCRIPTION f I E�J I t�l V(� G J� may, _ I L M I' 11 F, C) i"1-% .✓� This is an original unpublished drawing, ted created by IMPERIAL SIGN. connection is submitted project your personal g planned for you byIMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out - side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. — MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. �+�' �I"` I f°" G CUSTOMER /FIRM ADDRESS DRAWING NO. WORKKMA�jNS COMMP. NO. I I ✓� „i CUSTOMER /FIRM NAME l �'�I Lf (/ P I P / CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE , SCALE '! 1 v r-,-- � F,:,- \ /�, T l d� rlT�p No �5 GAJfNOE�T; ��TA,OVA- Amt IFLM-1 �AINT�b To MAT�N t3LDG. cam; !J H E rF,- u,UMINTIa� ; 51.ZE�,' Six 22' -" 510/¢� 1� r�� ® Distinctive Signage since 1981 INDIO, CALIFORNIA A 92201 (c,>n 3/5111155 CONTRACTORS LOC. NO. ?�(r(I jJ� ' A 11'' hoe LOCATION 1� Q U I �A DRAWN BY � DESCRIPTION 6 R " - �� ��`''� �1' A /y��� 1`'I This Is y «banal uS SIGN. hhis drawing, �l� �' IMPERIAL SIGN. H c WatMth . a Protect �i^G planned 1« you by IMPERIAL pr jean personal use In connection IMPERIAL SIGN. It Is not to be shown to anyone out. aide your organization, n« is it to be repro. ouced, copied «exhibited In any fashion. —MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. �� - GISTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS WIN6 NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. { 145 3001+ r /^ A rl1S7hMER/FIRM NAME �OG I C f—� ' �j CUSTOMER APPROVAL BONE GATE I �� 4i ` SCALE A rg- 0-- 6' LTR �l �'� LTA kT - • 51c-'r1 ELE\/a ug WRILMAO� - 3' ' {G. • •GYP � Q f31 -Di` � S1eEVi ew �ojj�,-6: H ET►I- OVEN• AtIGLr.- ip-a4 l Sruc.6v FWlbN To HATcfl "C-7, r-oc-K.efolwr: e2p! lug 51-LIc.60 FJ ► I 6�f To MA-FC � Plb%,LILP �G . w foal-?-p Lorfr--f-s• 00PY: - r�Ra►�o�s� (�TN-I.0EIZ.' To MPaTc -H -n LE-, I l-W M A :nOr : FLUO RE��P--�, ������ v Inc. �^a�� Co!�� COMP Distinctive Signage since 1961 INDIO, 6-120 CAL AOUN ST (619)3473-%6 345. 5 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 2o�j I 1 %� , 1 yf� JOB LOCATION (rA `^ ILII 1 DRAWN BY � DESCRIPTION � + `�� 1 � F (6-I ' N r _ CJ This is y Original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN, It is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out- side your organization, nor is it 10 be repro -. duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. MEMBER plilOrna EMCRiC Syn IlttOditll� CITY LIC. NO. /} 7 '3-, J CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS �P I � AWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. I 38°I�- r /^ , ,{ CUSTOMER /FIRM NAME iOG � I G �./r�lv.' I S CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE (� _�� 4-19 SCALE , 1 �J ���/� '5ROW He AL, ovElz 610-:5,6o r L WU UF� ST�Ic.Go cdry - r�l�a�lols� J E�,F, - �. �i: � ►� M I Nino r F�uo (����NT - Jia� :..�, CT`s -•r�- _- - Y s•� •- 1 �-�?'� aF ,� � - _ -, a^x. . 3 • 't+'.{T""..ii``�A� ' 1k� �, '^.x ta=i• � - -.:jt � .� v 4W 61PF'vi F'� �jJ �e, 1 !;'6" �� Distinctive Sipnape since 1 %1 INDIO, CAILIIFORN 092201T. (619) 345-13555 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 20 —J'f�� JOB LOCATION LA QL�If�Tp. DRAWN BY �� DESCRIPTION G�y. �`��O'�� �0����1 f G I N I This is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It Is submitted for your personal use In connection with a project Damp planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It fs not to be shown to anyone out. side your orpanizetion, nor is it to be repro- doted, copied a exhibited in any fashion. — MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS T a O �� _ DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. 11645 3047+ CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME KO 1F.S v CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE '� II LTf2- OT —� It 1L-TR :"T f 51 aT I o t`1 i+_ I 1 (9 11 51PP v ►Fvl NOTF-6: M ETA L ove.F- A 05Lf-' l p-o� - 5Tdcr o F1060 To Ni&TcR bL DG PACK - GROUND : OPAaU& 6TUC-60 f list T4 M,&TGN �DG. Co��; 'f'l�RG7�J015� P-ETAI rAEg To MATCR Tile- 1 U,uf1IfJPx.T10& FL UO�5CaNr �oTE: FOP- Ft�'96 P) f3 , C, D J v i . a UR a 00 O a D 0 1�D T a O �� s. I c aT I o t`1 i+_ I 1 (9 11 51PP v ►Fvl NOTF-6: M ETA L ove.F- A 05Lf-' l p-o� - 5Tdcr o F1060 To Ni&TcR bL DG PACK - GROUND : OPAaU& 6TUC-60 f list T4 M,&TGN �DG. Co��; 'f'l�RG7�J015� P-ETAI rAEg To MATCR Tile- 1 U,uf1IfJPx.T10& FL UO�5CaNr �oTE: FOP- Ft�'96 P) f3 , C, D 1�^�.r;a �� inc . ���pa Distinctive Signage since 1961 INDIO,C 120 CALHOUN 92201 ST. (61%,U7. 1196� CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. 2Q% /� /� `I JOB LOCATION LA e9d 1 dT�. DRAWN BY �j�j DESCRIPTION �y�i o� 5Tk, � I PWG MD► I U �,/� CiH � J �I I 1� V I • '`� '- I V, ' 1 �M1J/�1 This is y original unpublished is drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. n is submitted for your personal use In connection with e SIGN.t being planned for you a IMPERIAL SIGN. It is not to be shown to anyone out. side your organization, nor is it to be repro- duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. - MEMBER - CITY LIC. NO. ^ n ,L l� CUSTOMER/FIRM ADDRESS LAM ITEV �o UTED DRAWING NO. WORKKjMANS COMP. NO. 11 ' /4�..JiJ 1+ CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME y Co � 5 CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE ' � , ') -34 ,51 GO 7L yaT I0� ME l OTF,6: `_ M ETA"L OVER A-0GLF-' i pzo� - STucco FOI'bO To MATER 15LDG. �AcK-GFPLINP ; OrAAUE -STUCCO Fir�tst� Ta MAbTGN P-DG. �o UTED �-ETAI►JEf -: To MATER TILe- � u.0 M IrlaT�ofJ; ��Uo(�5c��l�r 7� `_ z 1l 6O� �� p rlal 51� ��� ar -41 COMP Distinctive T. (6e since 1961 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 220 T. (619) 53565 CONTRACTORS LIC. NO. Q 2 713`° � `�� JOB LOCATION 1AV1 DRAWN BY � DESCRIPTION DOUBLE FACED SANDBLASTED SIGN This is an original unpublished drawing, created by IMPERIAL SIGN. It is submitted for your personal use in connection with a project being planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. II is not to be shown to anyone out. side your organization, nor is it to be repro duced, copied or exhibited in any fashion. - — MEMBER — CITY LIC. NO. �p j CUSTOMERIFIRM ADDRESS A L� DRAWING NO. WORKMANS COMP. NO. I I G✓I 2r2��{ _ ►�/.l�l,F —� f A! . ��} ! ��J. CUSTOMER/FIRM NAME , v �^' 4 r CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE � SCALE Azi PERSPECTIVE VIEW .NTS -W _ _' &.; ..moo � `"tJ}� t jaZ�7a '� �a a+" � � � q' �'yt � � - �••"ti- �vj Aid' i av A. Y g � K C Y3 �✓ a, d 1 �*� t t � k r NOTES: SAO15L -Ahi�p GIGH W1 FAISF -P LT1zS. -ro MATS H coF?(21 Dcr FZ GoLv�Z cod(: A.s PEA T.,;• �)of-De�R; A5 TAT 1� SIGN FEE 2'' SQ �T�L Fob -DER 1`�Ibl fJG r- 3'( RAbI t1S SIGN DETAIL IM IE INS 1'=1'-0v STRUING, YOCCA, CAUN & RAUE A Professional Corporation 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600 Telephone: (714) 725 -4000 Newpor: Beach, CA 92660 -x,441 Fax: (714) 725 -4100 Date. 7/21/92 THE FOLLOWING DOCL,.E. NT INCLUDING THIS COYER SHEET IS 4 PAGES PLEASE DELIVER TO: NAME /COMPANY: Dawn :ioneywe11 r Esc{. FAX NO,: { 6119) 564 -5617 THIS DOCUMENT IS FROM: NAME: Chervi Dow MESSAGE: Revised Koenig rezolut"ion CLIENT NAME /MATTER ,NO,: 2338 -027 IF ANY OF THESE PAGES ARE NOT LEGIBLE OR YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL X714) 725 -4014. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE THIS MESSAGE IS INTE`I)ED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM D15CLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF 'PHIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE, AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA TIME U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU 7016u/9813/00 - �r���il0ri Q I IF, A j. Cix? 111'j1, r RESOLUTION ISO A RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE LEAST; OF REAL PROPERTY IN PROJECT AREA NO, 1 AND AUTHORIZING; THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "Agency ") under the pzovision of the California Community Redevelopment Law, is engaged in activities necessary for the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Area "); and WHEREAS, The John W. Koenig ^ompanies, a California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Koenig ") has an option to purchase a certain parcel of Yard located in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California described herein as the "Property "; and WHEREAS, Koenig and Agency desire to enter into a lease, (the "Lease ") subject to Koenig's purchase of a fee interest is the Property, for uses in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan; WHEREAS, in order to effectuate the provisions of that Redevelopment Plan, the Agency proposes to lease the Property from Koenig pursuant to the Lease; and WHEREAS. Koenig and the Agency have mutually prepared the Lease which contains all the provisions, terms and conditions and includes all obligations required by State and local law; WHEREAS, a public hearing has been duly noticed and held on the Lease; and WHEREAS, the Agency has duly considered all terms and conditions of the Lease and believes that the use of the Property for a public mini -park for the use of the citizens of La Quinta, all as more particularly set forth in the Lease, is in the bRRt interests of the City of La Quinta and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents,and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared a staff report pertaining to the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows; M Section 1. The Agency hereby finds that it can ba seen with certainty that there is no possibiliLy that the approval of the Lease and implementation of the Lease terns may have a significant effect on the environment and that such action is in furtherance of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Therefore, the activity is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and a notice of exemption from the provisions of CEQA shall be filed by staff with the County Clerk of the County of Riverside. Section 2. The Agency has received and considered the staff repo-.,,t on the Lease of the Property and, as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearing, the Agency finds and determines that: (i) the lease will assure development cf certain commercial uses within the Project Area, providing goods and t?ervices to the community, tax increment to the Agency, and sales tax to the City of La Quinta; and (ii) the 'ease of the property from Koenig to the Agency is justified under the p +ovisior. of the Community Redevelopment Law. SeGt7..o_n__ 1. The lease of the Property by Koenig to the Agency as described in the Lease is hereby approved,, provided that (i; if Koenig has not obtained a fee interest in the Property on or before , 1992, the Lease shall be deemed to have automatically germinated as of such date; and further provided that (ii) if Koenig has not, by no later than August 3, 1992, caused to be dedicated, without necessity of payment of any consideration by the City of La Quinta or the Agency, to the City of La Quinta a fee interest (or such other interest as may at the discretion of the City be satisfactory) in that certain real property depicted in Exhibit "A ", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the Lease shall be deemed to have automatically terminated as of such date. Section 4. The Chairman and the Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute all documents and take all other actions necessary to implement the Lease. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 1992. ATTEST: Agency Secretary 07/21/92 1986q/2338/027 Chairman -2- I, i � i � ' ' i �� I , F : I .i, 1 ^ 5 ti�'r 1 � T �i� LL 1 i r. l� � i - l � - 1 1� 07,/15/92 16' 36 $310 �4 8220 WEN I (;OMPAN i E" EXHIBIT -A. CROSS HAMM AREA LDICATES THE R9L PROPERTY WHICH 1 S TH SUBJECT OF THIS INE. Ili �r O A w r V P Ta w w w w a E► yi � o I , 1C \ U o 1 �� ey r� R '7 i nbrlfi r IVA } f � t T H E C I T Y 0 AL LaNinta 1982 - 19d1 Ten Carat Decade May 4, 1992 HLE COH Mr. John Koenig The Koenig Companies 2701 Airport Drive, Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -456 TIME EXTENSION Dear Mr. Koenig: This is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 28, 1992, s, approved your request for a one year time extension for the above plot plan. With approval of this time extension, expiration of this approval will be on April 9, 1993. Attached is a copy of the Conditions of Approval, including #42 which was modified. Please note that prior to construction, many of these Conditions of Approval will need to met as stipulated. Some.of them do require action prior to building permits being issued. `u= Should you have any comments regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner SBS:bja Enclosures cc: Engineering Department LTRSS.164 City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 ♦ 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 _ Phone (619) 564 -2246, Fax (619) 564 -5617 Design 8 Production: Mark Palmer Design. 619 346 -0772 ,- F3 ; 1- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLOT PLAN 91 -456 - RECOMMENDED APRIL 28, 1992 * Amended by Planning Commission 4 -28 -92 GENERAL 1. The development of the property shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for PP 91 -456, unless amended otherwise by the following conditions. 2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the final approval date (April 16, 1991) ; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is contemplated by this approval, not including grading which is begun within the one year period and is thereafter diligently pursued until completion. A one year time extension may be requested as permitted by Municipal Code. 3. Approval of this plot plan shall be subject to final approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 and Change of Zone 91 -063. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage or sales displays without specific approval of the Planning Commission. 5. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to shine directly on surrounding adjoining properties or public rights -of -way. Alternative parking lot lighting plans utilizing light pole standards varying in height from 20 feet to 35 feet shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Light standard type with recessed light source shall also be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Exterior lighting shall comply with Outdoor Light Control Ordinance and off - street parking requirements. 6. Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided for all structures and provided with opaque metal doors. Plans for trash enclosures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall contact local waste management company to insure that enclosure size is adequate. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry wall shall be provided adjacent to north and west property lines except within ten feet of street right -of -way line where wall shall be reduced in height to 30 inches. Decorate enclosure may be required by City around detention basin depending on grading and other screening. 8. Future expansion of Ralph's supermarket shall be subject to Planning Commission approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking demand shall be reviewed at that time to insure adequate parking is provided. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 9. Handicapped parking spaces and facilities shall be provided per Municipal Code and State requirements. 10. As required by the General Plan, Applicant shall provide noise study by qualified engineer to determine impacts on surrounding residential zones and uses. Noise study shall suggest mitigation measures which City can require. 11. Screen wall height adjacent to loading docks shall be determined by required Noise Study. Should noise problems from use of loading areas arise, Planning Commission shall retain the right to limit the hours of loading and unloading. Surrounding property owners and residents which could be affected by noise shall be notified of Planning Commission consideration of limitations on delivery hours. 12. The project shall comply with all existing off street parking requirements including but not limited to shading of parking lot areas, shopping cart storage, and bicycle parking spaces . 13. Decorative screen walls provided adjacent to street shall be high enough to screen parking lot surface and majority of parked cars from view of street. Determination of height of walls shall be made after review of landscaping and grading plans by City. 14. Landscaping planters along the north and west property lines shall be provided at maximum width possible with all unusable areas adjacent to property lines provided in landscaping. 15. The project shall comply with applicable Arts in Public Places Ordinance. 16. Meandering six foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on Calle Tampico. On Washington Street the sidewalk shall be a meandering 8 foot sidewalk with sidewalk not touching curb at any point except at driveways and intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. 17. Tower structures shall be a maximum 50 foot height. 18. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, a parcel map or lot line adjustment shall be approved and recorded to separate subject property from properties to the north. 19. The City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, with the Developer to pay costs, to prepare a mitigation and monitoring plan for artifact location and recovery. Prior to archaeological studies for this site as well as other unrecorded information, shall be analyzed prior to the preparation of the plan. CONAPRVL.009 2 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 The plan shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) for a two -week review and comment period. At a minimum, the plan shall: 1) identify the means for digging test pits; 2) allow sharing the information with the CVAS; and 3) provide for further testing if the preliminary result show significant materials are present. The final plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for final review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall have retained a qualified cultural resources management firm and completed the testing and data recovery as noted in the plan. The management firm shall monitor the grading activity as required by the plan or testing results. A list of the qualified archaeological monitor(s), cultural resources management firm employees, and any assistant (s) / representative (s) , shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The list shall provide the current address and phone number for each monitor. The designated monitors may be changed from time to time, but no such change shall be effective unless served by registered or certified mail on the Planning and Development Department. The designated monitors or their authorized representatives shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of resources. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further grading, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until appropriate mitigation measures are completed. Upon completion of the data recovery, the Developer shall cause three copies of the final report containing the data analysis to be prepared and published and submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this use, the Applicant shall obtain permits or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o City of La Quinta Planning & Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Department at the time of application for a building permit for the proposed project. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 21. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of building permits. 22. Final landscaping plans shall include approval stamps and signatures from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioners office and Coachella Valley Water District. 23. Bus turnout and bus waiting shelter shall be provided as requested by Sunline Transit when street improvements are installed. 24. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire site which shall be for the purpose of wind and erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blow sand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a.) use of irrigation during construction and grading activities; b.) areas not constructed on during first phase shall be planted in temporary ground cover or wildflowers and provided with temporary irrigation system; and c.) provision of wind breaks or wind rolls, fencing, and or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with requirements of the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent emission of dust and blow sand. 25. Construction shall comply'with all local and State Building Code requirements in affect at time of issuance of building permit as determined by the Building Official. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to a final building inspection approval, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The Planning and Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 27. If shopping carts are placed outside, they shall be screened from view of the parking lot in a manner which is approved by the Planning and Development Director. 28. A parking lot striping plan including directional arrows, stop signs, no parking areas, and parking spaces shall be approved by Planning and Development and Engineering Departments prior to issuance of a building permit. All roof equipment shall be screened from view by parapet walls of building or other architecturally matching materials. Construction of pad CONAPRVL.009 4 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 buildings shall be subject to approval of a non -public hearing plot plan and approval by the Planning Commission. 29. All compact spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only". 30. That all conditions of the Design Review Board shall be complied with as follows: A. A detailed complete sign program shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of first sign permit. Sign program shall include any center identification signs. B . The architecture materials and colors of the pad building shall be architecturally compatible (i.e. , identical architecture, colors, and /or materials) with the main shopping center building. C . Cement plaster texture used on building shall be of a decorative nature and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. D. Additional architectural treatment to the rear of the main building shall be provided in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties and approved by the Planning and Development Department. E. Along the street perimeters, the amount of turf utilized shall be reduced (i. e. , eliminate on back sides of slopes, and between sidewalk and curb areas) . F. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific trees, shrubs, and ground covers, and irrigation system type shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of final landscaping plans. G . Additional landscaping planting shall be provided in areas between fronts of main building and parking lot area. H . Water efficient irrigation system including bubblers and emitters shall be utilized wherever possible. I. Landscaping adjacent to north and west property lines shall be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with adjacent residentially zoned properties. J. All planting materials shall be water efficient to maximum extend feasible. CONAPRVL.009 5 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 31. The plaza areas as shown on the approved site plan shall be developed into shaded lounging areas with permanent seating provided. Said plans to be approved by the City at the time of landscaping plan review. CITY FIRE MARSHAL 32. The water mains shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 5000 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi. 33. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" X 4" X 2 -1/2" X 2- 1/211), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . 34. Prior to issuance of building permit Applicant/ Developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/ approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. " 35. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any combustible material being placed on the site. 36. Buildings shall be constructed so that the fire flow required for any individual building or unseparated area does not exceed 3500 gpm. 37. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s) . System plans must be submitted with a plan check/ inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 38. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. 39. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet ##10, but not less than 2A1OBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. CONAPRVL.009 6 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 40. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 41. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: *42. The Applicant shall dedicate public street right -of -way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: A. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 foot half width; the Washington Street Specific Plarf applies; B . Calle Tampico - Primary Arterial, 50 foot half width; the Calle Tampico Specific Alignment applies; Applicant shall execute right -of -way conveyance documents and return them to the City within 30 days after they are furnished to the Applicant by the City. 43. The Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Calle Tampico and Washington Street from the site except as specifically provided in these Conditions of Approval. 44. Access locations to the site and the character of the turning movements at those locations shall be as follows unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: A. Washington Street (305 feet north of Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with the turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. B . Washington Street (750 feet north of the Calle Tampico centerline) , the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -141) wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. C. Calle Tampico (the driveway shall align with the Civic Center driveway), the driveway shall be 42 feet (161- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. D. Calle Tampico (the west edge of the driveway shall be 5 feet east of the west site boundary) , the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. 45. The Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback lot of noted width adjacent to the following street right -of- way(s) : CONAPRVL.009 7 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 A. Calle Tampico, 20 feet wide; B. Washington Street, 20 feet wide. 46. The Applicant shall form a merchant's association and obligate the association with the fiscal and operational maintenance responsibility for the maintenance and continued upkeep of the landscape setback lot and parkway area adjacent to the roadway along the segments of Calle Tampico and Washington Street that are contiguous to the site boundary. As an alternative, the Applicant may choose to maintain the above areas. 47. Landscape and irrigation plans for the landscaped lots) shall be prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Planning Director, and City Engineer, and approved by same officials prior to construction. 48. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and on -site common area improvements before the issuance of a site grading permit. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective construction cost, for those improvements which involve fair -share responsibility that must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash in lieu of construction may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by the Applicant and City Engineer, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 49. The on -site grading plan shall be prepared by a register civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the grading permit. 50. The Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on the Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during grading of the site and construction of the improvements to insure compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant and charged with the compliance responsibility shall make the following certifications upon completion of construction: A. All grading and improvements were properly monitored by qualified personnel during construction for compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances and thereby certify the grading to be in full compliance with those documents. B . The finished building pad elevations conform with the approved grading plans. 51. Storm water run -off produced in 24 hours by a 100 year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless the Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with CONAPRVL.009 8 Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 52. The Applicant shall have a focused master drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm water disposal facilities are needed to protect the site from flooding by off site storm water. If the drainage study recommends the construction of off site storm water disposal facilities, the Applicant shall participate in the cost of the facilities, on a fair share basis. The tributary area to be studies includes all tributary land south of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, east of the Bear Creek Channel and west of Washington Street. 53. Applicant shall install a trickling sand filter and leach field in the retention basin to percolate nuisance water in conformance with requirements of the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 160 gallons per day per 5000 s . f . of landscaping. 54. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 55. The Applicant shall participate in the cost of the designing and installing street improvements. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and adopted Standard Drawings, and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name signs, sidewalks, and raised medians where required by City General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with City standards and practices. This includes tapered off site street transitions that extend beyond project site boundaries and join the widened and unwidened street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: CONAPRVL.009 9 o� Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street ( Calle Tampico to northerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Major Arterial, refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 2. Calle Tampico (Washington Street to westerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Primary Arterial (100 feet right -of -way option) refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 56. The Applicant shall participate in the cost, noted as follows, of designing and installing traffic signals at the following locations: A. Washington Street at Calle Tampico, 25% cost participation. B . Calle Tampico, approximately 550 feet west of Washington Street, 50% cost participation. C. Washington Street, approximately 750 feet north of Calle Tampico, 100% initial cost participation subject to 50% reimbursement when adjacent property to north develops. 57. The Applicant shall construct meandering sidewalk in the parkway and landscaped setback lot along Calle Tampico (6 feet wide) and Washington Street (8 feet wide) . 58. The Applicant shall provide a blank easement that covers the entire landscaped setback lots for the purpose of a meandering public sidewalk. 59. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 60. All existing and proposed electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, and are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 61. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 62. The site shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity, caused by a storm event greater than the 100 year 24 hour event, to flow out of the tract through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the tract shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow for those occasions when a storm greater than the 100 year 24 hour event occurs. CONAPRVL.009 Ott] r Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 April 28, 1992 63. The Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fe amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 64. The Applicant shall design and construct the parking lot in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code Off - Street Parking Ordinance. If the pad locations are proposed to be utilized by eating establishments, the Planning Commission during Plot Plan review shall consider whether adequate off - street parking exists. If it is determined that additional parking is needed, the Planning Commission may require an unused pad to be converted to off - street parking. CONAPRVL.009 11 --. . . ti w; ,2e ems H E C I T Y e La pinta 1982 - 1992 Ten Carat Decade April 8, 1992 Mr. John Koenig Koenig Companies 2601 Airport Drive Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 0 nu CUPW SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PLOT PLAN 91 -456 Dear Mr. Koenig: This is to inform you that your request for a one year time extension has been scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1992, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. This item will be heard as a public hearing item. This is because the Engineering Department wishes to modify Condition of Approval #42, pertaining to street dedication. Since the full dedication has not yet been given to the City, the Engineering Department is requesting that the required dedications be conveyed within 30 days after they are furnished to the applicant. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Stan B. Sawa Principal Planner SBS:ccs cc: Engineering Department City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 • 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 p /� Phone (619) 564 -2246, Fax (619) 564 -5617 LTRS S . 0 8 0 / C S Design & Production: Mark Palmer Design, 619 -346 -0772 �, _ - .. i . G lit. :.;.f �xs.SJ 1 T H E C[ T Y rVW La Quinta 1982 - 1991 Ten Carat Decade TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: 0 F MEMORANDUM Planning & Development Department Fred R. Bouma Associate Engineer March 9, 1992 Request for time extension for Plot Plan 91 -456 its sa 1, ( .0 � j... ...... f MAR 0 9 1992 "!1 .'f UN $.A QUfN'TA We request that the following paragraph be appended to the end of condition #42: "Applicant shall execute right -of -way conveyance documents and return them to the city within 30 days after they are furnished to the Applicant by the city." FRB /frb TRANSMITTAL MEMO Date : 3 -S- lq3- -I CITY ENGINEER -4 CITY MAilAGER X F IRE MARSHAL - -- Ste►" -i-� - ���� �� -- ccI ml I Ty SAFETY - -- � a t�AR 1.0 i99� -7 From: From: G 8L DC :rM �.., •;::.V . ` r Subject : PROJECT REVEW Case: lif - 46 � , �< oen .�-, rl-rq. - PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE ANY COMMENTS YOU MAY HAVE ON THE ATTACHED ITEM BY _mG►;�h I)ollclqQ- COMMENTS: NOCOMf ENT ate- - FIRE i SPECIALI MAR. 1 0 1992 _�, . 9' ' , j The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE February 25, 1992 BAR Mr. Jerry Herman v Planning & Development Director City of La Quinta 78-105 Cade Estado La Quinta, CA. 92253 RE: Shopping Center at NWC of Calle Tampico and Washington Street Dear Jerry: The purpose of this letter is to request a one (1) year extension of the approvals which resulted in General Plan Amendment 91 -035, Change of Zone 91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456 and the Conditions associated with Plot Plan 91-456 as dated April 9, 1991. Included is a fee for $75.00 which I am told is required for any such request for extension. We are continuing to work very hard at finalizing the leasing and financing commitments required to get underway and are encouraged to see the work going on as Washington Street is widened and work continues at your new city office complex. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Very truiy yours, ohn . Koenig sident 4 D JWK/jl 2601 Airpori -Dnve, S.uile 240 • Torronce, C:oliiornio 90505 (310) 534 -8060 • FAX (310) 534 -8220 CITY OF LA QUINTA 005182 W S14i 03 -05 -92 10 MISC, 1 75.00 0013400034010 10 CASH i TOTAL 1 75.00 1 AMOUNT TENDERED 75.00 CHANGE .00 THANK YOU The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE February 25, 1992 Mr. Jerry Herman Planning & Development Director (pity of T.2 Qu nta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA. 92253 Na—MINTA TE6 2 01 OF PLANNING RE: Shopping Center at NWC of Calle Tampico and Washington Street Dear Jerry: The purpose of this letter is to request a one (1) year extension of the approvals which resulted '�t;in General Plan Amendment 91 -035, Change of Zone 91 -063, Plot Plan 91 -456 and the Conditions associated with Plot Plan 91 -456 as dated April 9, 1991. Included is a fee for $75.00 which I am told is required for any such request for extension. We are continuing to work very hard at finalizing the leasing and financing commitments required to get underway and are encouraged to see the work going on as Washington Street is widened and work continues at your new city office complex. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Very truly yours, ohn . Koenig sident JWK /jl O J�'8" H8 i4 TO7A 0 75. 2601 Airpori Drive, SuHe 240 • Torrance, California 90505 (310) 534 -8060 • FAX (310) 534 -8220 AV, 9 May 8, 1991 • ���IV�I {A �S6 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 5642246 FAX (619) 564 -5517 Mr. John Koenig The Koenig Companies 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Dear Mr. Koenig: 0 As you recall the City Council referred your letter to the Arts in Public Places Committee. This Committee met on May 6, 1991, and discussed your request for a waived to the Art in Public Places Ordinance. The Committee, after discussion, decided that; 1) you can propose an art sculpture on your site subject to acceptance by the Art in Public Places Committee; or, 2) pay the Art in Public fee. This fee is estimated to be roughly $20,000. The exact amount would be determined at the time of building permit application. I have included a copy of the Art in Public Places Ordinance, and in particular I refer you to what the Committee would consider as public art. Again, your proposal would be sent to the Art Committee for their review and recommendation to the Council. Very truly yours, ERR ERMAN Planning & Development Director JH : bja cc: Art in Public Places Committee LTRJH.100 0 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 1990 So. Bundy Dr �. Fourth Floor Los Angeles California 90025 213.826 2100 The FAX 213 826 0182 Nadel Partnership Inc. Architecture Planning Interiors city !.4 �l/ //1/l�. �' • ��2 53 attention �, /r %WWyV �. we are sending you: ❑ herewith ❑ tracings ❑ under separate cover prints r3•Z7• Letter c •,ansmifal date Jam' ' z ' & regarding C. ae G,W,7/,P?,y Nadel project no. p0r via: Messenger ❑ blueprinter ❑ mail ❑ specifications ❑ FAX ❑ ups ❑ pick -up ■❑ these are ❑ for your approval ❑ for review and comment Xper❑ your request for use on job ❑ for your files u noz� y i /i 1' �•� �:! �%��� _.iii IMP i1 A If enclosures listed above are not received, notify at once !i �. f:► very truly yours, The Nadel Partnership Inc. Architects by lz� 'low 000"/ '0000 TAI ...... . ------- -- 'o 4,001 ,001I OAZK473� - ovew, a- 7 M " il - �704 - --, WORM 1 111111111 11111111111 ;+.: �, �� t� w TA 1990 So. Bundy Dr. Fourth Floor Los Angeles California 90025 213.826 2100 The FAX 213 826 0182 Nildel Partnership Inc Architecture Planning Interiors to address OF "J ❑ pursuant to our meeting confirming our telephone conversation ❑ please be advised Memoir, idum R4 MAR 2.8 1AC,' C'TV U�- LX VUINI -A '14111, V(; & DEVELOPIONT DEPT. date 0.'a; • 91 time regarding" W AMMW nVAS / . Nadel project no. 9Q • A. Any foregoing confirmation will be assumed to be correct and we will proceed accordingly unless we are notified in writing within five days of any corrections or errors. very truly yours, The Nadel Partnership Inc., Architects bhp Ci I The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER C11I it UkquMTA KAMING & DEVELUMOT DEPT. Leasing has begun on an at the northwest corner the City of La Quinta. end of 1991 with comple Village Shopping Center architecture. exciting new eleven acre shopping center of Calle Tampico and Washington Street in Construction is expected to begin by the tion in the fall of 1992. La Quinta will feature traditional, historic Spanish Ralphs, plus a major drug store, will anchor this 116,000 square foot retail development. The Koenig Companies is the developer.of Village I and Village II at Cook and Highway 111 in Indian Wells. The 1990 Census Bureau has indicated the City of La Quinta is the 3rd largest growing city in the State of California. The most significant feature about this shopping center is its ideal location within the heart of La Quinta. The La Quinta Village Shopping Center is very convenient and accessible to the year -round non - seasonal population. In addition, we will meet the needs of the exclusive PGA West and the La Quinta Country Club communities. The La Quinta Village Shopping Center is 2 1/2 miles from its nearest competition. In the interest of providing tenants with the most accurate and current demographic information, we have compiled the enclosed data. In reference to population and housing development, we have considered only that portion of the city of La Quinta that we believe is our trade area and will provide us with our customers. After compiling our numbers, we feel that a year round, non - seasonal population of aproximately 12,992 people exists within our trade area. There are an additional 12,021 units approved by the city for future development plus 2,546 units currently i-n - pr^ece�ss s�ee4k4ng -city We look forward to discussing the La Quinta Village Shopping Center with you. Susanne L. Condon Director of Marketing The Koenig Companies (213) 534 -8060 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 • Torrance, California 90505 (213) 534 -8060 - FAX (213) 534 -8220 r 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 April 22, 1991 Mr. John Koenig The Koenig Companies 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 FAX (619) 564 -5617 SUBJECT: SHOPPING CENTER AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND WASHINGTON STREET Dear Mr. Koenig: This is to inform you that the City Council at their meeting of April 16, 1991, approved General Plan Amendment 91 -035, Change of Zone 91 -063, and Plot Plan 91- 456 for your commercial shopping center at the corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. The second reading for the Change of Zone will be held at the next City Council meeting on May 7, 1991. The Change of Zone will become effective 30 days after that date. Attached is a copy of the applicable Resolution, and Ordinance, and Conditions of Approval for the Plot Plan. Additionally, we have not yet received the filing fee for the Environmental Assessment which is $285. Due to the implementation of AB 3158, State Law now requires that a filing fee now be made when the Notice of Determination for the Negative Declaration is filed with the County Clerk. This fee goes to the Department of Fish and Game. That fee is $1250 for the Department of Fish and Game and $25 handling fee for the County of Riverside. Therefore, a check for $1275 made payable to the County of Riverside must be submitted to the city as soon as possible. Once we have received this fee the required Notice of Determination will be submitted. Without the Notice of Determination being filed approval of the project is not considered final by State Law. LTRSS.063 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA; CALIFORNIA 92253 ,c . Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Ott+„ YS Sctwv. STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner SBS:bja cc: Shawn Roberts, Nadel Partnership LTRSS.063 a�4 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Ott+„ YS Sctwv. STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner SBS:bja cc: Shawn Roberts, Nadel Partnership LTRSS.063 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLOT PLAN 91 -456 - APPROVED APRIL 9, 1991 GENERAL 1. The development of the property shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for PP 91 -456, unless amended otherwise by the following conditions. 2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the final approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is contemplated by this approval, not including grading which is begun within the one year period and is thereafter diligently pursued until completion. A one year time extension may be requested as permitted by Municipal Code. 3. Approval of this plot plan shall be subject to final approval of General Plan Amendment 91 -035 and Change of Zone 91 -063. 4. There shall be no outdoor storage or sales displays without specific approval of the Planning Commission. 5. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to shine directly on surrounding adjoining properties or public rights -of -way. Alternative parking lot lighting plans utilizing light pole standards varying in height from 20 feet to 35 feet shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Light standard type with recessed light source shall also be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Exterior lighting shall comply with Outdoor Light Control Ordinance and off - street parking requirements. 6. Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided for all structures and provided with opaque metal doors. Plans for trash enclosures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall contact local waste management company to insure that enclosure size is adequate. 7. Six foot high decorative masonry wall shall be provided adjacent to north and west property lines except within ten feet of street right -of -way line where wall shall be reduced in height to 30 inches. Decorate enclosure may be required by City around detention basin depending on grading and other screening. 8. Future expansion of Ralph's supermarket shall be subject ' to Planning Commission approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking demand shall be reviewed at that time to insure adequate parking is provided. 9. Handicapped parking spaces and facilities shall be provided per Municipal Code and State requirements. CON"RVL . 009 e . A - T Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 10. As required by the General Plan, Applicant shall provide noise study by qualified engineer to determine impacts on surrounding residential zones and uses. Noise study shall suggest mitigation measures which City can require. 11. Screen wall height adjacent to loading docks shall be determined by required Noise Study. Should noise problems from use of loading areas arise, Planning Commission shall retain the right to limit the hours of loading and unloading. Surrounding property owners and residents which could be affected by noise shall be notified of Planning Commission consideration of limitations on delivery hours. 12. The project shall comply with all existing off street parking requirements including but not limited to shading of parking lot areas, shopping cart storage, and bicycle parking spaces. 13. Decorative screen walls provided adjacent to street shall be high enough to screen parking lot surface and majority of parked cars from view of street. Determination of height of walls shall be made after review of landscaping and grading plans by City. 14. Landscaping planters along the north and west property lines shall be provided at maximum width possible with all unusable areas adjacent to property lines provided in landscaping. 15. The project shall comply with applicable Arts in Public Places Ordinance. 16. Meandering six foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on Calle Tampico. On Washington Street the sidewalk shall be a meandering 8 foot sidewalk with sidewalk not touching curb at any point except at driveways and intersection of Washington Street and Calle Tampico. 17 . Tower structures shall be a maximum 50 foot height. 18. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, a parcel map or lot line adjustment shall be approved and recorded to separate subject property from properties to the north. 19. The City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, with the Developer to pay costs, to prepare a mitigation and monitoring plan for artifact location and recovery. Prior to archaeological studies for this site as well as other unrecorded information, shall be analyzed prior to the preparation of the plan. The plan shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) for a two -week review and comment period. At a minimum, the plan shall: 1) identify the means for digging test pits;- 2) allow sharing the information with the CVAS; and 3) provide for further testing if the preliminary result show significant materials are present. CONAPRVL.009 conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 The final plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for final review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall have retained a qualified cultural resources management firm and completed the testing and data recovery as noted in the plan. The management firm shall monitor the grading activity as required by the plan or testing results. A list of the qualified archaeological monitor(s), cultural resources management firm employees, and any assistant (s) /representative (s) , shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The list shall provide the current address and phone number for each monitor. The designated monitors may be changed from time to time, but no such change shall be effective unless served by registered or certified mail on the Planning and Development Department. The designated monitors or their authorized representatives shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of resources. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further grading, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until appropriate mitigation measures are completed. Upon completion of the data recovery, the Developer shall cause three copies of the final report containing the data analysis to be prepared and published and submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this use, the Applicant shall obtain permits or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City 'of La Quinta Public Works Department o City of La Quinta Planning & Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Department at the time of application for a building permit for the proposed project. 21. Provisions shall be'made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of building permits. 22. Final landscaping plans shall include approval stamps and signatures from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioners office and Coachella Valley Water District. CONAPRVL.009 \. , I . Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 23. Bus turnout and bus waiting shelter shall be provided as requested by Sunline Transit when street improvements are installed. 24. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire site which shall be for the purpose of wind and erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blow sand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a.) use of irrigation during construction and grading activities; b . ) areas not constructed on during first phase shall be planted in temporary ground cover or wildflowers and provided with temporary irrigation system; and c.) provision of wind breaks or wind rolls, fencing, and or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with requirements of the Directors of Public Works and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent emission of dust and blow sand. 25. Construction shall comply with all local and State Building Code requirements in affect at time of issuance of building permit as determined by the Building Official. 26. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to a final building inspection approval, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The Planning and Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 27. If shopping carts are placed outside, they shall be screened from view of the parking lot in a manner which is approved by the Planning and Development Director. 28. A parking lot striping plan including directional arrows, stop signs, no parking areas, and parking spaces shall be approved by Planning and Development and Engineering Departments prior to issuance of a building permit. All roof equipment shall be screened from view by parapet walls of building or other architecturally matching materials. Construction of pad buildings shall be subject to approval of a non -public hearing plot plan and approval by the Planning Commission. 29. All compact spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only" 30. That all conditions of the Design Review Board shall be complied with as follows: CONAPRVL.009 4 Conditions of Approval, - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 A. A detailed complete sign program shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of first sign permit. Sign program shall include any center identification signs. B . The architecture materials and colors of the pad building shall be architecturally compatible (i.e., identical architecture, colors, and /or materials) with the main shopping center building. C. Cement plaster texture used on building shall be of a decorative nature and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. D. Additional architectural treatment to the rear of the main building shall be provided in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties and approved by the Planning and Development Department. E. Along the street perimeters, the amount of turf utilized shall be reduced (i.e., eliminate on back sides of slopes, and between sidewalk and curb areas) . F. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific trees, shrubs, and ground covers, and irrigation system type shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of final landscaping plans. G . Additional landscaping planting shall be provided in areas between fronts of main building and parking lot area. H . Water efficient irrigation system including bubblers and emitters shall be utilized wherever possible. I . Landscaping adjacent to north and west property lines shall be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with adjacent residentially zoned properties. J. All planting materials shall be water efficient to maximum extend feasible. 31. The plaza areas as shown on the approved site plan shall be developed into shaded lounging areas with permanent seating provided. Said plans to be approved by the City at the time of landscaping plan review. CITY FIRE MARSHAL 32. The water mains shall be capable of providing a fire flow of 5000 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any two adjacent hydrants shall be 2500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi. CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 33. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" X 4" X 2-1/211 X 2-1/2"), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . 34. Prior to issuance of building permit Applicant/ Developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review /approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department 35. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any combustible material being placed on the site. 36. Buildings shall be constructed so that the fire flow required for any individual building or unseparated area does not exceed 3500 gpm. 37. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s) . System plans must be submitted with a plan check /inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans . 38. Install a Fire Alarm System per NFPA 71 that provides for valve supervision and 24 hour monitoring of the waterflow alarm at the automatic fire sprinkler system. Audible devices shall be placed as required for the waterflow alarm to be heard at any point in the building at a minimum of 10 db above the ambient noise level. 39. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 40. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 41. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: 42. The Applicant shall dedicate public street right -of -way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: CONAPRVL.009 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 A. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 foot half width; the Washington Street Specific Plan applies; B . Calle Tampico - Primary Arterial, 50 foot half width; the Calle Tampico Specific Alignment applies; 43. The Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Calle Tampico and Washington Street from the site ,except as specifically provided in these Conditions of Approval. 44. Access locations to the site and the character of the turning movements at those locations shall be as follows unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: A. Washington Street (305 feet north of Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with the turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. B. Washington Street (750 feet north of the Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. C. Calle Tampico (the driveway shall align with the Civic Center driveway), the driveway shall be 42 feet (16'- 12' -141) wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. D. Calle Tampico (the west edge of the driveway shall be 5 feet east of the west site boundary), the driveway shall be 30 feet wide with turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. 45. The Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback lot of noted width adjacent to the following street right-of-way(s): A. Calle Tampico, 20 feet wide; B. Washington Street, 20 feet wide. 46. The Applicant shall form a merchant's association and obligate the association with the fiscal and operational maintenance responsibility for the maintenance and continued upkeep of the landscape setback lot and parkway area adjacent to the roadway along the segments of Calle Tampico and Washington Street that are contiguous-to the site boundary. As an alternative, the Applicant may choose to maintain the above areas. 47. Landscape and irrigation plans for the landscaped lots) shall be prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Planning Director, and City Engineer,. and approved by same officials prior to construction. CONAPRVL.009 7 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 48. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and on -site common area improvements before the issuance of a site grading permit. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective construction cost, for those improvements which involve fair -share responsibility that must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash in lieu of construction, may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by the Applicant and City Engineer, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 49. The on -site grading plan shall be prepared by a register civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the grading permit. 50. The Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on the Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during grading of the site and construction of the improvements to insure compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant and charged with the compliance responsibility shall make the following certifications upon completion of construction: A. All grading and improvements were properly monitored by qualified personnel during construction for compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances and thereby certify the grading to be in full compliance with those documents. B . The finished building pad elevations conform with the approved grading plans. 51. Storm water run -off produced in 24 hours by a 100 year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless the Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 52. The Applicant shall have a focused master drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm water disposal facilities are needed to protect the site from flooding by off site storm water. If the drainage study recommends the construction of off site storm water disposal facilities, the Applicant shall participate in the cost of the facilities, on a fair share basis. The tributary area to be studies includes all tributary land south of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, east of the Bear Creek Channel and west of Washington Street. CONAPRVL.009 a Conditions of Approval PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 53. Applicant shall install a trickling sand filter and leach field in the retention basin to percolate nuisance water in conformance with requirements of the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 160 gallons per day per 5000 s . f . of landscaping. 54. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. 55. The Applicant shall participate in the cost of the designing and installing street improvements. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and adopted Standard Drawings, and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name signs, sidewalks, and raised medians where required by City General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with City standards and practices. This includes tapered off site street transitions that extend beyond project site boundaries and join the widened and unwidened street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street (Calle Tampico to northerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Major Arterial, refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 2. Calle Tampico (Washington Street to westerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Primary Arterial (100 feet right -of -way option) refer to La Quinta General Plan Figure VII -2. 56. The Applicant shall participate in the cost, noted as follows, of designing and installing traffic signals at the following locations: A. Washington Street at Calle Tampico, 25% cost participation. CONAPRVL.009 9 Conditions of Approval - PP 91 -456 - April 9, 1991 B . Calle Tampico, approximately 550 feet west of Washington Street, 50% cost participation. C. Washington Street, approximately 750 feet north of Calle Tampico, 100% initial cost participation subject to 50% reimbursement when adjacent property to north develops. 57. The Applicant shall construct meandering sidewalk in the parkway and landscaped setback lot along Calle Tampico (6 feet wide) and Washington Street (8 feet wide). 58. The Applicant shall provide a blank easement that covers the entire landscaped setback lots for the purpose of a meandering public sidewalk. 59. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 60. All existing and proposed electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, and are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 61. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 62. The site shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity, caused by a storm event greater than the 100 year 24 hour event, to flow out of the tract through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the tract shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow for those occasions when a storm greater than the 100 year 24 hour event occurs. 63. The Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fe amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 64. The Applicant shall design and construct the parking lot in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal .Code Off -Street Parking Ordinance. If the pad locations are proposed to be utilized by eating establishments, the Planning Commission during Plot Plan review shall consider whether adequate off -street parking exists. If it is determined that additional parking is needed, the Planning Commission may require an unused pad to be converted to off - street parking. CONAPRVL.009 10 r � f April 5, 1991 :y ± 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 Mr.. John Koenig The Koenig Companies 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO (PP 91 -456) Dear Mr. Koenig: This letter is to inform notify you that the Design Review Board at their meeting of April 3, 1991, recommended approval of your submitted plan subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed complete sign program shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of first sign permit. Sign program shall include any center identification signs. 2. The architecture materials and colors of the pad buildings shall be architecturally compatible (i.e., identical architecture, colors, and /or materials) with the main shopping center building. 3. Cement plaster texture used on building shall be of a decorative nature and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Additional architectural treatment to the rear of the main building shall be provided in those areas that would be most exposed to adjacent properties and approved by the Planning and Development Department. 5. Along the street perimeters, the amount of turf utilized shall be reduced (i.e., eliminate on back sides of slopes, and between sidewalk and curb areas). 6. A preliminary landscaping plan indicating specific trees, shrubs, and ground covers, and irrigation system type shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to preparation of final landscaping plans. 7. Additional landscaping planting shall be provided in areas between fronts of main building and parking lot area. LTRSS.057 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 � S s 8. Water efficient irrigation system including bubblers and emitters shall be utilized wherever possible. 9. Landscaping adjacent to north and west property lines shall be heavily planted to provide screening and buffering with adjacent residentially zoned properties. 10. All planting materials shall be water efficient to maximum extend feasible. This project has been scheduled for Planning Commission review at the meeting of April 9, 1991, at 7:00 P.M. At that time the Planning Commission will consider the recommendation of the Design Review Board regarding PP 91 -456 in addition to your request for a General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone. You should plan to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR &'=00� ep - STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner SBS:bja cc: Shawn Robert, Nadel Partnership LTRSS.057 1 The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE REGE'iiicD April 5, 1991 APR 0 8 199, ell YVrLA V?LANNlNG & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Mr. Jerry Herman CITY OF LA QUINTA 78 --105 Calle Estado La Quanta, CA 92253 RE: NWC Calle Tampico and Washington Street -- Art in Public Places Dear Jerry, The purpose of this letter is to request a waiver of the conditions imposed by City Council Ordinance #173 in which chapter 2.65 was added dealing with art in public places. From the site plan and elevation information already presented to the city, we have attempted to design a quality center to be well landscaped in which we'll feature many "user friendly" outdoor public conveniences. We do not have a central atrium or common point of entry such as is found in many office buildings where artwork would be a focal point of that entry. Consequently, we prefer to devote our construction budget to implementing as fully as possible attractive areas for visitors and customers to our shopping center complex. Consequently, a waiver of the Art in Public Places Ordinance is requested. Despite the fact that we are in a redevelopment area, we have not yet requested from the redevelopment agency any other form of assistance. Please let me know what I may do further to pursue this waiver of request. Thank you. Very Truly Yours, JJn W. Koenig 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 • Torrance, California 90505 (2131 534 -8060 • FAX (2131534-8220 " 7r ' �' � j �wP � ,�_ _. � �� � � TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: e T41tif 4 4(V a" PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT April 4, 1991 APR 0 1 1991 tali V Ut- LA YUINYA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT Plot Plan 91 -456, The Koenig Companies Northwest Corner Calle Tampico at Washington Street The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject plot plan and determined that certain improvements, dedications, and special requirements are necessary to comply with the City's General Plan and Municipal Code to assure orderly development at the proposed location. The Engineering Department therefore recommends the following comments be submitted to the City Council for consideration as Conditions of Approval for this land division. 1. The Applicant shall dedicate public street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: a. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 -foot half width; the Washington Street Specific Plan applies; b. Calle Tampico - Primary Arterial, 50 -foot half width; the Calle Tampico Specific Alignment applies; 2. The Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Calle Tampico and Washington Street from the site except as specifically provided in these Conditions of Approval. 3. Access locations to the site and the character of the turning movements at those locations shall be as follows unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. Washington Street (305' north of the Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 30' wide with the turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. b. Washington Street (750' north of the Calle Tampico centerline), the driveway shall be 42' (16'- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. c. Calle Tampico (the driveway shall align with the Civic Center driveway), the driveway shall be 42'(161- 12' -14') wide with no restrictions placed on the turning movements. 0 v e i 0 PP 91 -456 April 4, 1991 Page 2 d. Calle Tampico (the west edge of the driveway shall be 5' east of the west site boundary), the drveway shall be 30' wide with turning movements limited to right turn in and out only. 4. The Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback.lot of noted width adjacent to the following street right of way(s): a) Calle Tampico, 20 -feet wide; b) Washington Street, 20 -feet wide. 5. The Applicant shall form a merchant's association and obligate the association with the fiscal and operational maintenance responsibility for the maintenance and continued upkeep of the landscape setback lot and parkway area adjacent to the roadway along the segments of Calle Tampico and Washington Street that are contiguous to the site boundary. 6. Landscape and irrigation plans for the landscaped lot(s) shall be prepared in conformance with requirements of the Planning Director, and City Engineer, and approved by same officials prior to construction. 7. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and on -site common area improvements before the issuance of a site grading permit. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective construction cost, for those improvements which involve fair -share responsibility that must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash in lieu.of construction may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by the Applicant and City Engineer, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 8. The on -site grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the grading permit. 9. The Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on the Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during grading of the site and construction of the improvements to insure compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant and charged with the compliance responsibility shall make the following certifications upon completion of construction: PP 91 -456 April 4, 1991 Page 3 a. )all grading and improvements were properly monitored by qualified personnel during construction for compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances and thereby certify the grading to be in full compliance with those documents. b.) the finished building pad elevations conform with the approved grading plans. 10. Storm water run -off produced in 24 hours by a 100 -year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basin(s) designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. The basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless the Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage ammenties all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. 11. The Applicant shall have a focused master drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer to determine what storm water disposal facilities are needed to protect the site from flooding by offsite storm water. If the drainage study recommends the construction of offsite storm water disposal facilities, the Applicant shall participate in the cost of the facilities on a fair share basis. The tributary area to be studied includes all tributary land south of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, east of the Bear Creek Channel and west of Washington Street. 12. Applicant shall install a trickling sand filter and leach field in the retention basin to percolate nuisance water in conformance with requirements of the City Engineer. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 160 gallons per day per 5000 s.f. of landscaping. 13. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. A statement shall appear on the final subdivision map that a soils report has been prepared for the tract pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. PP 91 -456 April 4, 1991 Page 4 14. The Applicant shall participate in the cost of the designing and installing street improvements. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC and adopted Standard Drawings, and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited.to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name _signs, sidewalks,, and raised medians where required by City General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. The minimum structural section for residential streets shall be 3" AC over 4" Class 2 Base. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with City standards and practices. This includes tapered off -site street transitions that extend beyond tract boundaries and join the widened and unwidened street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street ( Calle Tampico to northly boundary of site) - Install half -width Major Arterial, refer to LQ General Plan Figure VII -2. 2. Calle Tampico (Washington Street to westerly boundary of site) - Install half -width Primary Arterial (100' right of way option) refer to LQ General Plan Figure VII -2. 15. The Applicant shall participate in the cost, noted as follows, of designing and installing traffic signals at the following locations: 1. Washington Street at Calle Tampico, 25% cost participation. 2. Calle Tampico, approximately 550' west of Washington Street, 50% cost participation. 0 PP 91 -456 April 4, 1991 Page 5 3. Washington Street, approximately 750' north of Calle Tampico, 100% initial cost participation subject to 50% reimbursement when adjacent property to north develops. 16. The Applicant shall construct an meandering sidewalk in the parkway and landscaped setback lot along Calle TampicoVand Washington Stree 17. The Applicant shall provide a blank easement that covers the entire landscaped setback lots for the purpose of a meandering public sidewalk. 18. The Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and comment with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 19. All existing and proposed electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, and are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 20. All underground utilities shall be installed, with trenches compacted to City standards, prior to construction of any street improvements. A soils engineer retained by the Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 21. The site shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity, caused by a storm event greater than the 100 -year 24 -hour event, to flow out of the tract through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the tract shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that has historically received flow for those occasions when a storm greater than the 100 -year 24 -hour event occurs. 22. The Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the City as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fee amount(s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the City. 23. The Applicant shall design and construct the parking lot in accordance with the L.Q.M.C. Off - Street Parking ordinance. 0 s 42/28/91 11.45 $213 534 8220 KOENIG COMPANIES 1 The K(OHNIG Companies REAL ESTATE Februrgry 27, 1991 Mr. Jerry Herman Planning and 0evelcPment Director City of La Quinta 78 -1^05 Calle Erstado [,a Quinta, CA 92253 IkXALIYL FEB 2 8 999' CITV u- LA QUINTA PLANNING & DEVELONINT f T. ICE: Northwest Corner - Calle Tampico and W8shington Street - La Quinta, CA Dear Jerry, W The purpose of this letter -iS to regUe5t that the above referenced slapping center project which has been scheduled fcir review by the Design Review Board, the Planning Commission, and the City Council during the month of March to rescheduled to tho following meetings: 1. Design Review Wsdr)esday, April 3 5:30 P - m . 2. Planning Commis ion Tuesday, April . 3 '/:CO p�,rn. 3. City Council Tuosday, April 16 7:00 p.m. I. apologize for the noed to postpone these hearing dates, However, in order to provide the type product we. feel appropriate, the delay was necessary in order to better r ^efine our development concepts. If you have any gQestions, please be sure and let me know. Very Truly Yours, Ci hr W . KQe g ,�- 4.. Y OW Extended Page 1,1 2601 Airporr Drive, Suite 240 v Torrance, ColifornO 90505 (2l3l ,5,34 -8060 • FAX (2131534 -8220 /rte t The KOENIG Companies REAL ESTATE February 14, 1991 Mr. Jerry Herman Planning Department CITY OF LA QUINTA 78 --105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Proposed shopping center NWC Washington Street and Calle Tampica Dear Jerry: RECEIVED FHB 15 1991 CITY tit- LA gUINTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Enclosed is a Commercial Plot Plan Application for the above - referenced shopping center development together with the required fee of $835.00. The site plans and elevations are being sent under separate cover by the project architect, the Nadel Partnership. If you need anything further please let me know. We are still anticipating being on the agenda for the March 6 meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Ver Truly Yo rs, 1 W. Koe iig 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 • Torrance, California 90505 (213) 534 -8060 • FAX (213) 534 -8220 I 3. 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 5642246 February 11, 1991 Mr. John Koenig The Koenig Companies 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 240 Torrance, CA 90505 SUBJECT: SHOPPING CENTER AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALL_E_ TAMPICO AND WASHINGTON STREET (GPA 91 -035, CZ 91 -063, P P 91 -456) Dear Mr. Koenig: The Planning and Development Department Staff has reviewed the preliminary elevations you submitted on February 4, 1991, and would offer the following comments: 1. The general concept of the submitted plan is acceptable. 2. The maximum building height allowed in the proposed C -P -S Zone is 50 feet. Should you desire additional height, Staff would need to know this at the time of submission. 3. In as much as this property is located adjacent to the entrance to the downtown Village Specific Plan area, we would like your project to conceptually conform with the goals and intent of the Specific Plan. 4. We would like to see a plan which provides "pedestrian scale" and outdoor areas which would lend themselves to social gatherings and leisurely seating. 5. The tower structure interior should be finished if it will be visible from ground level through openings. 6. The Washington Street Specific Plan requires that structures within 150 feet of the right -of -way shall be limited to one story. 7. The sides and rear elevations of the proposed structures should be finished in an architectural style that matches the front elevations. 8. All pad buildings should be architecturally compatible to the center. LTRSS.041 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 A- ;19- ( 1t 9. Another comment which relates to the site plan layout pertains to pads "C" and "D". These building pads should be combined into one pad and placed in the area which is shown as parking between the two pads. The combined building should be placed diagonally near the corner of the street intersection with a substantial landscape setback from the street provided. We would suggest that you informally submit your site plan prior to the plot plan application being filed. This will allow us to minimize any major problems. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR �• Stan B. Sawa Principal Planner SBS:bja cc: Nadel Partnership LTRSS.041 1 !d, �-A A a- n U-2 Skylight Barrel Tile Clay Roofing Stucco To Match Center Texture To Match Center -Exposed Beam Tails Metal Frames +20' W/ Clear Glazing , _4 tc I! ii 01, ' j I 2 7 IL 7 w t> h-j" If 11 -Zn '.1 A -if Y n "i "T -r, J, -Itj�`-�4,' 16U j IJ IL v, ra TVI J, Fag, F%Trl -1 M/A`flf�l I fj I f A U 1 1-1 ELL �vIAIAIUWN -PIN 6 41 1 771 T T� 'T. f ------ v S SY OUSU-4 66 0 0 U 8, I/) < Z U C) < 0 C) ca Z 0 :_O Z C 0 N S U L T A N T 0 �-A A a- n U-2 Skylight Barrel Tile Clay Roofing Stucco To Match Center Texture To Match Center -Exposed Beam Tails Metal Frames +20' W/ Clear Glazing , _4 tc I! ii 01, ' j I 2 7 IL 7 w t> h-j" If 11 -Zn '.1 A -if Y n "i "T -r, J, -Itj�`-�4,' 16U j IJ IL v, ra TVI J, Fag, F%Trl -1 M/A`flf�l I fj I f A U 1 1-1 ELL �vIAIAIUWN -PIN "IM R ULt .3" _4 J V i e %mv F r o On + 14' T +3' Window Sill Scale: 1/8"=1' -OU V "�r w rrorn (_.ia.H.,e "IM R ULt .3" _4 J V i e %mv F r o On + 14' T +3' Window Sill Scale: 1/8"=1' -OU V "�r ,vcale: 1/8"=V-0" D R A W I N G < 66 0 0 U I/) < Z U C) < 0 C) ca Z 0 :_O Z C 0 N S U L T A N T 0 0 Z Z < 0 -A U X < < c0i _13 A CL Uj C) Z 0 < I W o < < -4 T ----T T_ zK l am. _ < L.0 ce > < < < uu CO 0 Z .'k 0 ,vcale: 1/8"=V-0" D R A W I N G 66 0 0 U I/) Z U C) < 0 C) ca :_O 0 C 0 N S U L T A N T c0i _13 I W T "A S C A L F -1 E T I D R A W N A T� P R 0 `33.1 /4/ t IJ i. T M, "RIZA-29 M v `11 T VI 2 MEER. mmIg CIF REQUIRED) FINIS14 AND TEXTURE TO MATCH BASE TO REMAIN OIZAK RATEK!'KOOF 5CA15k 1- EXISTING5. COLOR TO MATCH SEE" 0676011- STANDARD CRAY OR=. COLOR 4 PATTERN M41TE 5HADOK FIELD VERIFY COLOR MATCH. To MATCH Exisnw VERIFY IN FIELD. SCALE, lord a EASTINU MAUPHts SOU 111 ELCIEVATION (PARTIAL) z COLUMN BAS VV 250'4) M-5. 02 LINE OF (E) ASPHALT WNC. C4 (E) CONCRETE FOOTING 04 INSTALL (N) 6X6 Imo'. POST, So DET. ------- _4 L J EXISTWG COLUAN FOOTING 3 VERIFY PilOrN IN FIELt)_-y LINE OF (E) CONC. COLUMN ELI. 8�_ - 8" { Ems. CURB, MOYJ I' R. ROUNDED COINER AS REO'D. AT ALL IL CORNERS. EXT. rEm, PLASTER ON EXP. MTL. LATH OVER `tF FM- _ 2 LAYERS f, T PAPEIR5, rf?. F -LER -131XV6. :4L LINE OF PLA6TEREJ2 tvIOULVIN&I emovi 'OUIRK"CORNM STONE, T — R *VW CORNER 0 -5/4" STONE PAVERS, ON AS REQV. ALL EF;* I" MORTAR SETTING BED SRI OVER E)Qw. MTL. LATH OVER FELT PAPER OVER, CENTERLINE OF &X6 516" EXT. &RAM PL` AOM M. C4LUMN TYP, OVER :2X4 SIMS WALE4 COLLM PLANVIEW IRE-USE Z e"vh TRELLIS@ 48° O.C. NEA SCROLL CUT TO X MATCH EX15TIN67 % RE --U5E (E) ML7AL ANj6LE5 AND DOLTS OF TRELLIS -USE (E) COLUMN MEMEM PRIME AND FAINT RE TO CAPS AND BOLTS. AN&LM AID 500 -5 VERFY CONDITION OF CONNECTOR k, MATCH 101000 STAIN COI-OR. ', ? PRIOR TO IN5TALLI ATION. 5Lom RE-USE (E) 6X14 100. 10'-11" A.F.F. 5M. VERIFY CONDITION Cf BEAM 4 SADDLE 1VTOP nATE CONNECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REPLACE AS NEEDED. IXM. SHIM ALL AR4XNV Iz' INSTALL (N) 24 (9A,661, SWEET ,,,�- KrLl. COLUMN CAP T16HT TO VNDM51DE OF SADDLE --2.yb K7TRlFM REAM CONN.. MITER ALL CORNERS AID SOU)MI, ALL JOINTS AND SADDLE INITH CAULKIN6 ALL )OP4XIND To 7, SHEA114IN6 5:ALE: x. Twills EXT Oe-l. PLASTM. ON EXP wt. LATH OVER 2 LAYtft OF-FMT PAPERS OVER 3/8' EXT. GRADE `PLYAOW OVER 2X45TUDS, TYP, «_ - 4" 0 51EMI-ROUND ?MV TRIM OVER IX Y400D MK*, NAtLep To 2XELK-6. HOOP FILL BLKI(5 0:124" OL. VERT. IZ 3/4! eTONE PAVERS OVM I MIN, MORTAR SETTING BED OVM EXP. MrL, LATH 4 80:*. PAPM. STONE PA\/M5 TO MATCH EXISTING SEALMT AS R50'0. >< !�M VET A-1 0 A.C. PAVING 1L 7 mc7m Twu cmuw 6 -WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL A HEREIN CONS PLICATED, USED OR Dl� w THE WRITTEN CONSENT �Of THE ARCHITECT t "THE NA DEL' PARTNERSHIP INC ALL RIGHTS' 'RESERVED ALL DRAWINGS AND ND UNPUBLISHED, WORK OF THE ARCH! AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DU '>CLOSED TH I OU COP (E) N /03REVIATVNS: I KvIx EXISTIN65 + A_ J 4 I �'. w z— — — — — — — — -- 4- :2 _0 L4-- AX I t x ARM r/z r --l") '7;q t7- L 2 7= JIM [4= W FIELD VERIFY b COLUMN C•ITION e L W 711 X z A�` W CE) �DJACMTGHOP BLO No, I c NOW '-,DATE ©B" NO =SHEET s, ee S M I/aft o PARTI& TH m f BUILDING PEPARIMENT, RE SUE, iMI'TTAL XX XX-XX eUjLDIt4G DEPA"ENT I5YE31A -X 2 2 2 PLOT DATE' 09-24 O"'ER jtt4ANT116�E , r, 3, 1 PLAN KEY NOTE51 &ENERAL TE5: Z COLUMN TO BE REMOVED. FOOTING, TO BE REMOVED TO 6' BELOA TOP OF A.C.PAVIN6. PATCH AND REPAIR I. ALL VOK MATERIALS, METHODS, ETC. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL WVMI* BUILDINC, CODES, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS oM AGENCIES. A.C. PAVIN6 FLUSH MTN EX15T]Wv. OONSTRI)OT (N) COLUMN STRUCTURE PEIR VETS. 5 and 6, TYP. FOR FOUR PLACES (FIELD VERIFIED) 2. THE 6ENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL DIMENSIONS aid CONDITIONS THEREON WORE COMMENCINS THE VOW. REVISl REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES AND OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS TO THE 05 (E) CANOPY COLUMN TO REMAIN ARCHITECT, PRIOR TO PROCEMIN6. LINE OF (N) (oXD TIRELL15 MEMBER 0 46" OL., ABOVE NOTE- CUT THESE MEMBER FROM EXI5TIN6 6X6 RAFTER. 5. REMOVE AND PROPER-Y 019POSE OF ALL CONSTRXTION DEOR15 FROM 517E. RE46E (E) 6X14 TRELL15 BEAM, IF UNDAMA6EP. FIELD VERIFY 13EAM CONDITION PRIOR TO RE•USE. PARKIN& STALL STRIPRN6 TO REMAIN RE-STRIPE AS REOUIREV, (E) 6X14 TRELLIS BEAM, ABOVE, TO REMAIN. TRELLIS FRAMING TO M REI'VVED. REUSE AS MANY FRAMING' MI; R5 AS PO! IME. Z 0 (E) CONCRETE WE EL STS. TO REMAIN. { �, (E) N /03REVIATVNS: I KvIx EXISTIN65 + A_ J 4 I �'. w z— — — — — — — — -- 4- :2 _0 L4-- AX I t x ARM r/z r --l") '7;q t7- L 2 7= JIM [4= W FIELD VERIFY b COLUMN C•ITION e L W 711 X z A�` W CE) �DJACMTGHOP BLO No, I c NOW '-,DATE ©B" NO =SHEET s, ee S M I/aft o PARTI& TH m f BUILDING PEPARIMENT, RE SUE, iMI'TTAL XX XX-XX eUjLDIt4G DEPA"ENT I5YE31A -X 2 2 2 PLOT DATE' 09-24 O"'ER jtt4ANT116�E , r, 3, 1