The URL can be used to link to this page

PP 1991-466 (4)CITY OF LA QUINTA , PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO JUL 2 i9! LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 nrry iip LAOUINTA RESIDENTIAL and PLOT PLANNING & Case No.; * Date Received: 7- 3 ql COMMERCIAL FEE =-- PLAN APPLICATION " a( - .21 In order to process your application in a timely manner, please complete and sign this form. The information which is required to be shown on the plans and submitted with the application is stated on the back of this form. Failure to provide the required informaLE is justification for rejection of the application. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A NON- REFUNDABLE FILING FE OF $ L S �`= AND ✓.; COPIES OF THE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE PLOT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. Name of Applicant Simon Plaza, Inc. Phone 619 - 773 - Mailing Address P.O.Box 461, 78 -611 Highway 111, La Quinta 92253 Street City Zip Code Legal Owner 3S Partnership & Pomona First Federal AddressP•O.Box 1461, 78 -611 Highway 111, La Quinta, CA 92253 Proposed' Use Commercial The net and gross square footage for each proposed use and ,building. Location.of Property (Address if known) F50 sq.ft. Assessor's Parcel Number Parcel Map 18418 in Book 113, Pages 49 & 50 Parcels 2,3,4 5,7 Legal Description of Property (give exact legal description as recorded in the office of the County Recorder) - -,(may be attached) Signature of Applicant Signature of It Date _ i J9 Date Cf IIR 7eff • PH.: 619/773 -2345 FAX: 619/568 -4567 HIGHWAY ONE - ELEVEN at WASHINGTON P.O. BOX 461 78 -611 HWY. 111, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT :: - - -- j Toodf y � IxommArm Im OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1991 ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION FOR PLOT PLAN 91 -466 & VARIANCE 91 -019. REQUEST IS TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH MAY INCLUDE A RESTAURANT /BANK, BOWLING ALLEY (40 LANES), MULTI -STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS, A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE ON THE S/E CORNER OF HWY 111 & WASHINGTON STREET ON +5 ACRES. A VARIANCE APPLICATION HAS ALSO BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC. BACKGROUND: CDPV ulKrGi AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: The Applicant has submitted a development request to build a new commercial center at the southeast corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street. The development has been under review by the City for the past few months and presently the city is waiting for Caltrans comments on the developer prepared traffic study. The Planning Commission will consider the development request on November 26, 1991. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION• 0 The City Council cannot take any formal action on this item. However, if the City Council wishes they can comment on the development request and pass on any comments you might have to staff or the applicant. Submitted by: ' Signature CC #11 /19.F2 /CS Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER h r. V �Z 4 F �Re MEMORANDUM OF T1� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1991 PROJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 & VARIANCE 91 -019 SUBJECT: TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH MAY INCLUDE A RESTAURANT/ BANK, BOWLING ALLEY (40 LANES), MULTIPLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS, A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ONE SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL, AND OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET, BOTH MAJOR ARTERIALS. THE DEVELOPMENT, ON +5 ACRES OF LAND, IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING SIMON MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP ON HIGHWAY 111. A VARIANCE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THE PARKING STRUCTURE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE. APPLICANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC.; PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT ARCHITECT: MERLIN J. BARTH OWNER: 3S PARTNERSHIP & POMONA FIRST FEDERAL EXISTING ZONING: CPS SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE: NORTH: CPS Commercial; Vacant (future One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center) SOUTH: CPS Commercial; Vacant (future Washington Square Commercial Center) EAST: CPS Commercial; Existing Simon Motors WEST: CPS Commercial; Existing Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The proposed +5 acre site is comprised of six parcels. The flat and undeveloped parcels were created by the division of land under Parcel Map 18418 in 1982. The property has frontage on 3 streets with 650 feet along Washington Street, 700 feet along Highway 111, and 180 feet along Simon Drive. MEMOGT.009 /CS -1- E J The site elevation along Washington Street is approximately 60 feet above sea level. The site is improved with street improvements. However, additional widening is necessary on Washington Street to conform with the City's adopted Specific Plan Alignment program. A future raised median island is proposed for both Washington Street and Highway 111. BACKGROUND: The property was subdivided in the early 1980's for the development of Simon Motors Automotive Dealership as well as to establish commercial lots which could be sold or developed with commercial land uses. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: One story 8,000 square foot restaurant /bank (Washington /Highway 111). Two story (plus basement) 60,500 square foot office building (Washington). Four story 35,000 square foot office building (Washington). One story 5,000 square foot restaurant, one story 37,240 square foot Bowling Alley, two & three story 18,150 square feet office building (Highway 111) and two story 12,000 square foot fitness center. Total = +165,000 square feet ARCHITECTURE• The project architect, Mr. Merlin J. Barth, of Anaheim, has prepared a plan which proposes buildings around the outer portion of the site with parking in the center of the facility. A parking structure will be located_ on the east side of the property. The proposed Mediterranean design (Spanish style design motif) is consistent with the City's design guidelines (e.g. the roof, rough stucco exterior, large glass windows, etc.). CIRCULATION /PARKING: The developer has proposed access driveways on each respective public street. The two -way driveway on Highway 111 and Washington Street will service the proposed courtyard guest parking lot (approximately 88 parking spaces). The driveways lead to the five story parking garage (four floors above grade with one subterranean level) located at the southeast corner of the site. The parking garage will house approximately 576 cars. The parking ratio for this project is (165,000/669) one on -site space for every 250 square feet of leasable floor area.' MEMOGT.009 /CS -2- O The developer has prepared a traffic study to address the developmental impacts of the project on abutting City streets, and the cumulative impacts the project may have on the future level of service of Washington Street /Highway 111. Caltrans is presently reviewing the project traffic study. VIEW CORRIDOR: The City's General Plan discusses site views as an important element of projects which have frontage on major streets within the City.. Along Washington Street the policy states that no building greater than one story in height shall be built within 150 feet of the future street property line. This standard has been in effect for the last few years and has been a condition on all of the development cases along Washington Street. The attached plan does not meet this provision, and the developer has requested a waiver from the policy. VARIANCE APPLICATION: The project does not meet the side yard requirements of the CPS Zone District for the east side of the project. The standard states that any building which is higher than 35 feet (up to 50 feet) shall have a minimum property line setback of not less than two feet for each one foot above 35 feet. The proposed parking structure would not conform with this requirement. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: The Planning Commission will review the, project at their meeting of November 26, 1991. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council cannot take formal action on this item. However, if the City Council wishes they can comment on the development request and pass on any comments you might have to staff or the applicant. Attachment: 1. Location Map 2. Reduced Plans MEMOGT.009 /CS. -3- �• 1 0 Trader � I / •..• ��. NJ OX. Co, ` AV j ""mil►' r J, i v IV 1 ' vv % ) 1 n .� Trailer , \� > b)a n Park . weld;;: 7 &Trailer Park Li railer -Park \ i e } R j I -well c a L• wait.. , 0 . b0 , Q c O l O P !� � ` ...y •' r ' I cr+uc CAI 1401 0 O 0 .� • \—V • . so weu Well t . •/ C 2 Z, AL. ' .• 6 TA t 1 �^ e..... LA QUIN O.. AL.IF:.. 6 NE /4 PALM DESERT IS' ADRAt+CLE a N3337.5— W11611/7.5 l 1959 i. PHOTOREVISED 1980 • • DMA 2751 111 HE— SERIES V895 SM 38 ' l Vacant Existing - Traffic Signal l j Vacant land Plata La Quinta Parking - Beef b Brew i i 4 wVacant Building Point Happy Ranch d Q IL Q P Existing Tract Homes Washington Street Frontage Road ti Raised Median CASE MAP CASE Na SIMON PLAZA PROJECT LOCATION MAP Restaurant/Bank- Higher III �-t �• � � � a �0 2 Story Above Ground Office .Complex w/ 1 St, Below Ground r est. Bowl i ng I Center Fitness I I IM11110 CITY OF LA WIMTA PLANNING MPARTMENT I Parking Structure 2 -4 Story Offices r . \\� /o' EXHIBIT r. T� CASE NO. ZITI: 1'LAW p: r C� L , 01 NNW. It =UPC% EF"m urralr.."% f -:::) Fs' fil L EP 2 6 1991 �l - A f A MT, ;Nor EXHIBIT CASE NO i®r :gym is _II 2 1- ;AT i®r _II n FRI) SEP 2 6 1991 r•�'Y QF :�' ItU(NTA TM EPA goof iiii .. ! r 7 - -.- EXHIBIT _CASE NO. = . 1:=.- i r1 rid J � t Y rr30 ' l � ' • Y OFTW& QUILD04a - MTsGf CI P_v.•.T10N - - rT..Ua��Tt *r . i � �� SEP 2 6 1991 'Y'"F'A (;U„ifA • .•� �I I�f ��I r [1 �� +arn.. �.r .. ./� ./► ,J�. dr. i��'�h - EXHIBIT �I RON= t 3 i� �G `4 C f 1 J� tjgt�aht:a�. wara�•na>raei�'... NSawv:a ;� r f , EP 2 6 1991 LJY ..l�r�•�r: a.lt(iiri(A mr_�--m �iEGTIOW d6 Arrt y. EXHIBIT _CASE NO. 1 1 1 M fY1 EXHIBIT CASE NO. . 1!'�J'flfrt : V��.�M r`� •Aw a��.v'w�11a #�� JUL 2 6 1991 rte..... H Al _iYMiwa_ . aw\t��u as��f o, J JUL 2 6 1991 CASE NO. JUL 26 r,l i a I[- ".p. ouii., A -4 J! EXHIBIT CASE NO. 6il-4L Ir =� � 066 � w `~-'-----�''- '------ - -- ------ i - ~04 - ---- EXHIBIT E cc INC 1661 9 z I n r - �JT ON 3SV3 jjqm)(3 1 L sr 'r STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PH* tt4 RLE COR DATE: NOVEMBER- 26, 1991 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 22, 1991) CASES: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 AND VARIANCE 91 -019 APPLICANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC.; MR. PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT ARCHITECT: MR. MERLIN J. BARTH PROJECT ENGINEER: MR. JOHN SANBORN, SANBORN /WEBB, INC. OWNER: ' 3S PARTNERSHIP & POMONA FIRST FEDERAL REQUEST: 1. PLOT PLAN - REQUEST TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH MAY INCLUDE A RESTAURANT/ BANK, BOWLING ALLEY (40 LANES), MULTIPLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS, A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ONE SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL, AND OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. 2. VARIANCE - A REQUEST TO DEVIATE FROM THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE STANDARDS. LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET. THE DEVELOPMENT, ON +5 ACRES OF LAND, IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING SIMON MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP ON HIGHWAY 111. EXISTING ZONING: C -P -S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission continued the case on October 22, 1991, to November 26, 1991, because the Traffic Study had not been reviewed by Caltrans, and our Staff did not have adequate time to examine the initial submittal. The Traffic Study was revised on November 7, 1991, however, since this time the updated final report has not been delivered to the City for final consideration. Staff is therefore unable to present the final report to the Commission because of this delay. It should be noted that this document is one key component of the Environmental Assessment thus the City would be in err to consider the project without this material pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. It should be noted that Caltrans has responded to the initial study but they too have not commented on the revised document as of the writing of this report. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission continue the Public Hearings for Plot Plan 91 -466 and Variance 91 -019 to December 10, 1991. PCST.022 y i Restaurant /Bank Highway I11 rt Ir ngl \ V 2 Story Above Ground Office .Complex w/ 1 St( Below Ground ra 0 � �A 9e0 -re ee Rest. ' Aft "7 Bowl i ng Center Fi tness i I f- i1Y Of. u MANNING OF.I OTA WNT T1 I r Parking Structure i 2 -4 Story Offices BIY .. �� CASE NO.q__j =`_ 31TIr- PLAN t T� r m PH -3 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HIE 060 DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1991 CASES: PLOT PLAN--91-466 AND VARIANCE 91 -019 APPLICANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC.; MR. PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT ARCHITECT: MR. MERLIN J. BARTH PROJECT ENGINEER: MR. JOHN SANBORN, SANBORN /WEBB, INC. OWNER: 3S PARTNERSHIP & POMONA FIRST FEDERAL REQUEST: 1. PLOT PLAN - REQUEST TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH MAY INCLUDE A RESTAURANT /BANK, BOWLING ALLEY (40 LANES), MULTIPLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS, A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ONE SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL, AND OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. 2. VARIANCE - A REQUEST TO DEVIATE FROM THE C -P -S ZONE CODE SETBACK STANDARDS. LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET. THE DEVELOPMENT, ON +5 ACRES OF LAND, IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING SIMON MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP ON HIGHWAY 111. EXISTING ZONING: C -P -S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) BACKGROUND: Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission continue the request to either your November.12th or November 26th meeting. Staff needs the additional time to examine the traffic study (not submitted at time of writing) and hydrology study. Caltrans has' also requested an opportunity review the traffic study. Since this request was noticed in the. paper and mailed to the residents, it is appropriate for the Commission to take public testimony at the meeting, however, no action is warranted. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission continue the Public Hearings for Plot Plan 91 -466 and Variance 91 -019 to November 26, 1991. PCST.022 001 ,�. ��w.�;� r� ��n. Restaurant /Bank Higher 111• Ill ... _ 1 T rc • Rest. . 7' 2 Story Above Ground Office .Complex w/ 1 Story Below Ground C C T� d 9�0 h s A I Bowling I Center I i I Fitness I I 6; a ra S EP 2 6 1991 CITY of u GUINTA PLANNING Of,PARTMENT Parking Structure 2 -4 Story Offices .►°'� EXHIBIT .CASE NO. �I SITE_ I'LAM ��" s a CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLOT PLAN 91 -466 - PROPOSED OCTOBER 22, 1991 SIMON PLAZA GENERAL 1. The development of the property shall be generally be in conformance with the exhibits contained in the file for PP 91 -466, unless amended otherwise by the following conditions. 2. The approved plot plan shall be used within one year of the final approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. "Be used" means the beginning of substantial construction which is contemplated by this approval, not including grading which is begun within the one year period and is thereafter diligently pursued until completion. A one year time extension may be requested as permitted by Municipal Code. . 3. There shall be no outdoor storage or sales displays without specific approval of the Planning Commission. 4. All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not to shine directly on surrounding adjoining properties or public rights -of -way. Light standard type with recessed light source shall also be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Exterior lighting shall comply with Outdoor Light Control CONAPRVL.037 1 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 Ordinance and off - street parking requirements. 5. Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided for all structures and provided with opaque metal doors. Plans for trash enclosures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall contact local waste management company to insure that enclosure size and number are adequate. 6. Decorative enclosures may be required by the City around any detention basins depending on site grading requirements and the color, location, and placement of said fence shall be approved by the Planning and Development Department. 7. Phased improvement plans shall be subject to Planning Commission review. 8. Handicapped parking spaces and facilities shall be provided per Municipal Code and State requirements. 9. As required by the General Plan, Applicant shall provide noise study by qualified engineer to determine impacts on surrounding residential zones and uses. The noise study shall suggest mitigation measures which the City can require concerning the development of the site. 10. The project shall comply with all existing off street parking requirements CONAPRVL.037 2 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 including, but not limited to shading of parking lot areas, bicycle parking spaces, compact parking, handicap parking, etc. 11. Decorative screen walls (i.e. , berms with landscaping, masonry walls, etc.) provided adjacent to street shall be high enough to screen parking lot surfaces and a majority of parked cars from view of the street. Determination of height of walls shall be made after review of landscaping and grading plans by City. 12. Perimeter landscaping planters shall be provided at maximum width possible with all unusable areas adjacent to property lines provided in landscaping. 13. The project shall comply with applicable Arts in Public Places Ordinance. 14. The City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, with the Developer to pay costs, to prepare a mitigation and monitoring plan for artifact location and recovery. Prior to archaeological studies for this site as well as other unrecorded information, shall be analyzed prior to the preparation of the plan. The plan shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society (CVAS) for a two -week review and comment period. At a minimum, the plan shall: 1) identify the means for digging test pits; 2) allow sharing the information with the CVAS; and 3) provide for further testing if the CONAPRVL.037 3 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 preliminary result show significant materials are present. The final plan shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for final review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall have retained a qualified cultural resources management firm and completed the testing and data recovery as noted in the plan. The management firm shall monitor the grading activity as required by the plan or testing results. A list of the qualified archaeological monitor(s), cultural resources management firm employees, and any assistant (s) / representative (s) , shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. The list shall provide the current address and phone number for each monitor. The designated monitors may be changed from time to time, but no such change shall be effective unless served by registered or certified mail on the Planning and Development Department. The designated monitors or their authorized representatives shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of resources. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further grading, excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until appropriate mitigation measures are completed. CONAPRVL.037 4 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 Upon completion of the data recovery, the Developer shall cause three copies of the final report containing the data analysis to be prepared and published and submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 15. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this use, the Applicant shall obtain permits or clearances from the following agencies: o City Fire Marshal o City of La Quinta Public Works Department o City of La Quinta Planning & Development Department o Coachella Valley Water District o Desert Sands Unified School District o Imperial Irrigation District o Caltrans (Department of Transportation/ District 11) Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Department at the time of application for a building permit for the proposed project. 16. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City adopted infrastructure fee program in affect at the time of issuance of building permits. CONAPRVL.037 5 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 17. Final landscaping plans shall include approval stamps and signatures from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioners office and Coachella Valley Water District. 18. A bus waiting shelter shall be provided as requested by Sunline Transit on the Washington Street when said street improvements are re- installed or unless other site locations are permitted by the transit authority (e.g., Simon Plaza) . c 19. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning and Development Department an interim landscape program for the entire site which shall be for the purpose of wind and erosion and dust control. The land owner shall institute blow sand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a.) use of irrigation during construction and grading activities; b.) areas not constructed on during first phase shall be planted in temporary ground cover or wildflowers, and provided with temporary irrigation system; and c.) provision of wind breaks or wind rolls, fencing, and or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with requirements of the Directors of Public Works.and Planning and Development. All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent emission of dust and blow sand. CONAPRVL.037 6 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 20. Construction shall comply with all local and State Building Code requirements in affect at time of.issuance of building permit as determined by the Building Official. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning and Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to a final building inspection approval, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a written report demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval -and mitigation measures. The Planning and Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 22. A parking lot striping plan including directional arrows, stop signs, no parking areas, and parking spaces shall be approved by Planning and Development and Engineering Departments prior to issuance of a building permit. All roof equipment shall be screened from view by parapet walls of building or other architecturally matching materials. 23. All compact spaces shall be clearly marked "compact cars only". 24. That all conditions of the Design Review Board shall be complied with as follows: CONAPRVL.037 7 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 A . The landscape plan shall include an eight foot wide meandering pedestrian /bike trail. The plans shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to submission of the final landscape plan by the Applicant/ Developer. B. The landscape program for Washington Street shall include a variation of planting materials, i.e., Palm trees, accent shade trees, lawn, shrubs, and groundcover. The use of mature California Pepper, Australian Willow, Mesquite, Crape Myrtle, Bottle Trees, and Washington Robusta Palms should be encouraged. Varieties of flowering shrubs such as Texas Ranger, Cassia, Crepe Myrtle, and Dwarf Oleander should be utilized. Native (low water use) plants should be used, and the landscape architect should consult the Coachella Valley Water District's plant material list prior to designing their proposal. Uplighted trees or palms should be considered along Washington Street and Highway 111. Incandescent light fixtures will be required (less than 160 watt) . C. The proposed retention areas on -site shall be landscaped with materials which will support growth even though they are accepting water run- off-from paved surfaces. D . Any proposed parking lot lighting plan shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to building plan check. A photometric study should CONAPRVL.037 8 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 be developed which analyzes the lighting pattern on the project and meets the City's Lighting Ordinance provisions as explained in Chapter 9.210 and 9.160 (Off- Street Parking) . The height of the light poles should not exceed 18 feet in height. E. The Developer shall contribute to the landscape and /or hardscape program of the future median island on Washington Street and Highway 111. F. A one story building height of 28 feet shall be maintained along Washington Street and Highway 111 within 150 feet of the ultimate property line (after street dedication has been included) . G. Decorative concrete entryways . shall be provided for all two -way driveways into the project site. The concrete shall be stamped and colored to accentuate the proposed development. The color, design and location of the concrete shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board during a final plan check review. H. The final plans shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to the submission of the plans to the Building Department for final check consideration. The final plans should include but not be limited to landscaping and irrigation, building, signs, mechanical, etc. CONAPRVL.037 9 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 I. Bike racks shall be provided at convenient areas within the site for usage by bicycle riders. One space for every 50 parking spaces shall be provided as noted in the Off - Street Parking Code. J. The landscape setback on Washington Street shall be a minimum of 20 feet from the new property line. K. All open parking stalls shall be screened by walls, landscape hedges, or a combination thereof to a minimum height of 42 inches. L. A master sign program shall be submitted during final plan check review. CITY FIRE MARSHAL 25. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 gpm for a 3 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based upon all buildings being equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 26. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" X 4" X 2-1/21' X 2-1/211), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any CONAPRVL.037 10 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 adjacent hydrants) in the system. 27.. Prior to issuance of building permit Applicant/ Developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the . water system plans to the Fire Department for review /approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. " The required water system including fire .hydrants shall be installed and operational prior to start of construction. 27. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a. minimum of 25 feet from the buildings) . System plans must be submitted with a plan cheek/ inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 28. Install a supervised waterflow fire alarm system as required by the Uniform Building Code. CONAPRVL.037 11 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 29. Install a Hood Duct automatic fire extinguishing system. System plans must be permitted, along with a plan check/ inspection fee, to the Fire Department for review. 30. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 31. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, #503. 32. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 33. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 34. Install a Class I Standpipe System. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: 35. Applicant shall dedicate public street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the city's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable Specific Plans if any, and as required by the City Engineer, as follows: CONAPRVL.037 12 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 NJ A. Washington Street - Major Arterial, 60 -foot half width between north and south project boundaries; B . Highway 111 - Major Arterial, 60 -foot half width between east and west project boundaries. 36. Applicant shall provide a fully improved landscaped setback area of noted . minimum width adjacent to the following street right of way: A.) Washington Street Frontage Road, 20 -feet wide (westerly side only); B.) Highway 111, 20 feet wide; C.) Simon Plaza, 10 -feet wide. 37. Applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to Washington Street Frontage Road from the project site except for one location as proposed by the Applicant and shown on the attached site plan. 38. Applicant shall have street improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer. Street improvements shall be designed and constructed for all streets within the proposed subdivision and for off -site streets as required by these conditions of approval. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the LQMC and adopted Standard Drawings,and City Engineer and shall include all appurtenant components required by same, except mid -block street lighting, such as but not limited CONAPRVL.037 13 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 to traffic signs and channelization markings, street name signs, sidewalks, and raised medians with landscape improvements where required by city General Plan. Street design shall take into account the soil strength, anticipated traffic loading, and design life. Miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements where joined by the newly required improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the City Engineer to assure the new and existing improvements are appropriately integrated to provide a finished product that conforms with city standards and practices. This includes tapered off -site street transitions that extend beyond tract boundaries and join the widened and existing street sections. The following specific street widths shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted therewith: A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1. Washington Street (limits are north and south site boundaries) Install half width Major Arterial improvements, refer to General Plan Figure VII -2; 2. Highway 111 (limits are east and west of site boundaries) install half width, Major Arterial, street improvements, refer to General CONAPRVL.037 14 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 Plan Figure VII -2. 39. Applicant is responsible for the cost to design and re- construction of the traffic signals at: A. Washington Street at Highway 111 - % fair share responsibility; 40. Applicant shall construct, or enter into agreement to construct, the site grading, off -site public improvements and utilities, and on -site common area improvements before the grading permit is issued. Applicant shall pay cash, in lieu of and equivalent to the respective fair -share construction cost, for those improvements that the Applicant has partial cost responsibility and construction must be deferred until the full complement of funding is available. Payment of cash may be deferred to a future date mutually agreed by Applicant and City, provided security for said future payment is posted by Applicant. 41. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological, and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted with a report submitted for review along with grading plan. The report recommendations shall be incorporated into the grading plan design prior to grading plan approval. The soils engineer and /or the engineering geologist must certify to the adequacy of the grading plan. CONAPRVL.037 is Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 42. The grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 43. The site shall be designed and graded in a manner so the difference in building pad elevations between contiguous lots that share a common street frontage does not exceed three (3.0) feet. The pad elevations of contiguous lots that do not share a common street shall not exceed five (5.0) feet. If Applicant is unable to. comply with the pad elevation differential requirement, the city will consider and may approve other alternatives that satisfy the city's intent to promote and ensure community acceptance and buyer satisfaction with the proposed development. 44. The project shall be graded in a manner that permits storm flow in excess of the retention basin capacity to flow out off the site through a designated emergency overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. Similarly, the site shall be graded in a manner that anticipates receiving storm flow from adjoining property at locations that has historically received flow. 45. Storm water run -off produced on -site in 24 hours by a 100 -year storm shall be retained on site in landscaped retention basins designed for a maximum water depth not to exceed six feet. Off -site water that flows onto the site may outfall to the historic drainage routes provided the discharge does not encroach on the Washington Street, Highway 111 or any other travelway. The CONAPRVL.037 16 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. The percolation rate shall be considered to be zero inches per hour unless Applicant provides site - specific data that indicates otherwise. Other requirements include, but are not limited to, a grassed ground surface with permanent irrigation improvements, and appurtenant structural drainage amenities all of which shall be designed and constructed in accordance with requirements deemed necessary by the City Engineer. The City will consider and may approve other ground cover /slope stabilization plant life in lieu of grass on a case by case basis. The tributary drainage area for which the Applicant is responsible shall extend to the centerline of Washington Street. 46. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect for the landscaped setback area and frontage road separation island. The plans and proposed landscaping improvements shall be in conformance with requirements of the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Coachella Valley Water District and the plans shall be signed these officials prior to construction. 47. Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and approval with respect to the District's Water Management Program. 48. Applicant shall landscape and maintain the landscaped setback area and right CONAPRVL.037 17 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 of way between any street curb and property line. 49. Applicant shall construct an eight -foot wide meandering bike path in the combined easterly parkway of Washington Street and southerly parkway of Highway 111. A standard 6 -foot sidewalk shall be built on Simon Drive. 50. All existing and proposed telecommunication, television cable, and electric power lines with 12,500 volts or less, that are adjacent to the proposed site or on -site, shall be installed in underground facilities. 51. Underground utilities that lie directly under street improvements or portions thereof shall be installed, with trenches compacted to city standards, prior to installation of that portion of the street improvement. A soils engineer retained by Applicant shall provide certified reports of soil compaction tests for review by the City Engineer. 52. Applicant shall pay all fees charged by the city as required for processing, plan checking and construction inspection. The fee amount (s) shall be those which are in effect at the time the work is undertaken and accomplished by the city. 53. Applicant shall retain a California registered civil engineer, or designate one who is on Applicant's staff, to exercise sufficient supervision and quality control during construction of the tract grading and improvements to certify CONAPRVL.037 18 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 compliance with the plans, specifications, applicable codes, and ordinances. The engineer retained or designated by the Applicant to implement. this responsibility shall provide the following certifications and documents upon completion of construction: A. The engineer shall sign and seal a statement placed on the "as built" plans that says "all (grading and grades) (improvements) on these plans were properly monitored by qualified personnel under my supervision during construction for compliance with the plans and specifications and the work shown hereon was constructed as approved, except where otherwise noted hereon and specifically acknowledged by the City Engineer". B . prior to issuance of any building permit, the engineer shall provide a separate document, signed and sealed, to the City Engineer that documents the building pad elevations . The document shall state the pad elevation approved on the grading plan, the as built elevation, and clearly identify the difference, if any. C. provide to the City Engineer a signed set of "as built" reproducible drawings of the site grading and all improvements installed by the Applicant. 54. The Environmental Fees of the State Fish and Game Department and the CONAPRVL.037 19 0 Conditions of Approval Plot Plan 91 -466 October 22, 1991 County of Riverside shall be paid within 24 hours after review of the proposed by the Planning Commission and /or City Council. 55. The final working drawings shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission prior to building permit issuance. Said plans shall include building landscaping, irrigations, signing, addressing, street, mechanical, lighting, utility plans and materials. 56. All required improvements shall be completed prior to site occupancy of the proposed development. CONAPRVL.037 20 �Q w 1 T VI" LH VVIN 1 H � o *PLANNING C0M1,v1ISSI [V COPY OF OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of La Quinta Planning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on October 22, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers, 78 -105 Calle Estado, on the following item: ITEM: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 VARIANCE 91 -019 A.`-_CANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC. Lb, ;ION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON 'J STREET AND HIGHWAY 111 REQUEST: TO DEVELOP A MIXED USE COMMERCIAL COMPLEX WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIPLE STORY BUILDINGS ( +165,000 SQUARE FEET) AND A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE (PLUS .ONE SUB -GRADE LEVEL) PARKING STRUCTURE ON _ +5.5 ACRES ZONED SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL. A VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO VARY THE SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF CPS ZONE DISTRICT. LEGAL: APN: 617 - 020 -020 THRU 025 NORTH HALF OF SECTION 30, T5S R7E The La Quinta Planning and Development Department has previously completed Environmental Assessment 91 -211 on the project. Based upon this assessment, the proposal will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The La Quinta Planning Commission will consider adoption of the Negative Declaration along with the above cited case at the Hearing. Any person may submit written comments on the proposal to the Planning and Development Department prior to the Hearing and /or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the Plot Plan at the time of the Hearing. If you challenge the decision of this Plot Plan in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues that you or someone else raised either at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning and Development Department at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. The proposed Plot Plan file may be viewed by the public Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5 :00 p.m. at the Planning and Development Department, La Quinta City Hall, 78 -099 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. --------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- DO NOT PRINT BELOW THIS LINE PUBLISH ONCE ON OCTOBER 1, 1991 t-c i i': a.� � ' ,' �: ;..•; Y v 1�✓ COPI C DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1991 PROJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 REQUEST: TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL CENTER WHICH MAY INCLUDE A RESTAURANT /BANK, BOWLING ALLEY (40 LANES), MULTIPLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS, A FOUR STORY PARKING STRUCTURE WITH ONE SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL, AND, OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 11,1 AND WASHINGTON STREET, BOTH MAJOR ARTERIALS. THE DEVELOPMENT, ON +5 ACRES OF LAND, IS LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE EXISTING SIMON MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP ON HIGHWAY 111. APPLICANT: SIMON PLAZA, INC.; PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT ARCHITECT: MERLIN J. BARTH OWNER: 3S PARTNERSHIP & POMONA FIRST FEDERAL EXISTING ZONING: CPS SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE: NORTH: CPS Commercial; Vacant (future One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center) SOUTH: CPS Commercial; Vacant (future Washington Square Commercial Center) EAST: CPS Commercial; Existing Simon Motors WEST: CPS Commercial; Existing Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The proposed +5 acre site is comprised of six parcels. The flat and undeveloped parcels were created by the division of land under Parcel Map 18418 in 1982. The property has frontage on 3 streets with 650 feet along Washington Street, 700 feet along Highway 111, and 180 feet along.Simon Drive. The site elevation along Washington Street is approximately 60 feet above sea level. DRB10 /2.F2 /CS -1- � w `- ' 4, y _ The site is improved with street improvements. However, additional widening is necessary on Washington Street to conform with the City's adopted Specific Plan Alignment program. A future raised median island is proposed for both Washington Street and Highway 111. BACKGROUND: The property was subdivided in the early 1980's for the development of Simon Motors Automotive Dealership as well as to establish commercial lots which could be sold or developed with commercial land uses. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: One story 8,000 square foot restaurant /bank (Washington /Highway 111). Two story (plus basement) 60,500 square foot office building (Washington). Four story 35,000 square foot office building (Washington). One story 5,000 square foot restaurant, one story 37,240 square foot Bowling Alley, two & three story 18,150 square 'feet office building (Highway 111) and two story 12,000 square foot fitness center. Total = +165,000 square feet ARCHITECTURE: The project architect, Mr. Merlin J. Barth; of Anaheim, has prepared a plan which proposes buildings around the outer .portion of the site with parking in the center of the facility. A parking structure will be located on the east side of the property. The proposed Mediterranean design (Spanish style design motif) is consistent with the City's design guidelines (e.g. the roof, rough stucco exterior, large glass windows, etc.). CIRCULATION /PARKING: The developer has proposed access driveways on each respective public street. The two -way driveway on Highway 111 and Washington Street will service the proposed courtyard guest parking lot (approximately 88 parking spaces). The driveways lead to the five story parking garage (four floors above grade with one subterranean level) located at the southeast corner of the site. The parking garage will house approximately 576 cars. The parking ratio for this project is (165,000/669) one on -site space for every 250 square feet of leasable floor area. DRB10 /2.F2 /CS -2- m The developer is preparing a traffic study to address the developmental impacts of the project on abutting City streets, and the cumulative impacts the project may have on the future level of service of Washington Street /Highway 111. VIEW CORRIDOR: The City's General Plan discusses site views as an 'important element of projects which have frontage on major streets within the City. The policy states that no building greater than one story in height shall be built within 150 feet of the future street property line. This standard has been in effect for the last few years and has been a condition on all of the development cases along Washington Street. The attached plan does not meet this provision, and the developer has requested a waiver from the policy. A letter for Best, Best and Krieger is attached. Staff has reviewed the letter from Mr. Paul T. Selzer of Best, Best & Krieger, and we recognize their request. However, staff is of the opinion that the project should meet the provisions of the General Plan (even though it is only a policy statement). This document is the City's long range plan to City growth and development. Further deviations from this provision will only lead to additional erosion of the Washington Street Specific Plan. This will be addressed further with the Planning Commission once the case has been forwarded to them for consideration. It is appropriat.e .that .the Design. Review Board comment on this issue. Your comments will be reviewed by the Commission. STORMWATER RETENTION: The on -site storm water retention study from the developer is forthcoming. It should be noted that the site is devoted to impervious materials (buildings and parking). Staff is concerned that the review of this plan will change drastically once the on -site hydrology plan is submitted. The plan will show that the developer cannot meet his 100 year storm requirements on -site, thereby affecting the design scenario, as proposed. Staff would prefer not to act on this case until the preliminary study is submitted for review. VARIANCE APPLICATION REQUIRED: The architect has not meet the side yard requirements of the CPS Zone District for the east side of the project. The standard states that any building which is higher than 35 feet (up to 50 feet) shall have a minimum property line setback of not less than two feet for each one foot above 35 feet. The proposed parking structure would not conform with this requirement. DRB10 /2.F2 /CS -3- ,. r STAFF COMMENTS: 1. The landscape plan shall include an eight foot wide meandering pedestrian /bike trail. The plans should be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to submission of the final landscape plan by the applicant /developer. 2. The landscape program for Washington Street should include a variation of planting materials, i.e. palm trees, accent shade trees, lawn, shrubs, and groundcover. The use of mature California Pepper, Australian Willow, Mesquite, Crape Myrtle, Bottle Trees, and Washington Robusta Palms should be encouraged. Varieties of flowering shrubs such as Texas Ranger, Cassia, Crepe Myrtle, and Dwarf Oleander should be utilized. Native (low water use) plants should be used, and the landscape architect should consult the Coachella Valley Water District's plant materials list prior to designing their proposal. Uplighted trees or palms should be considered along Washington Street and Highway 111. Incandescent light fixtures will-be required (less than .160 watt). 3. The proposed retention areas on -site should be landscaped with materials which will support growth even though they are accepting water run -off from paved surfaces. 4. Any proposed parking lot lighting plan should be reviewed by the Design Review Board prior to building plan check. A photometric study should be developed which analysis the lighting pattern on the project and meets the.City's Lighting Ordinance provisions as explained in Chapter 9.210 and 9.160 (Off- street Parking). The height of the light poles should not exceed 18 feet in height, and the lighting contractor should reduce this height if physically possible during review of the project. 5. The developer should contribute to the landscaping and /or hardscape program of the future median island on Washington Street and Highway 111. 6. A one story building height of 22 feet shall be maintained along Washington Street and Highway 111 within 150 feet of the ultimate property line (after street dedication has been included). 7. Decorative concrete entryways' shall be provided for�.all two -way driveways into the project site. The concrete should be stamped and colored to.accentuate the proposed development. The color, design and location of the concrete should be reviewed by the Design Review Board during a final plan check review. DRB10 /2.F2 /CS -4- 8. The final plans should be reviewed Board prior to the submission Building Department for final plan The final plans should include but landscaping and irrigation, buildi: etc. by the Design Review of the plans to, the check consideration. not be limited to ags, signs, mechanical, 9. Bike racks should be provided at convenient areas within the site for usage by bicycle riders. One space for every-50 parking spaces should be provided as noted in the Off- street-Parking Code. 10. The applicant should file a Variance Application if they cannot meet the side yard setback requirements of the CPS Zone District. 11. The landscape setback on Washington Street should be a minimum of 20 feet from.the new property line. 12. All open parking stalls should be screened by walls, landscape hedges, or a combination thereof to a minimum height of 42 inches. 13. A master sign program should be submitted during final plan check review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Design Review Board recommend a continuance of Plot Plan 91 -466 until the preliminary hydrology study can be reviewed. Should the Board disagree with this recommendation, then the Board should condition the project accordingly and forward the case to the Planning Commission for consideration. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Large Plans 3. Reduced Plans 4. Applicants statement for the Variance 5. Letter stamp dated September 9th from 6. Zone District Excerpt (CPS Zone) DRB10 /2.F2 /CS -5- Application Best, Best and Krieger ;. o "J Trader / Pu>< \ i ^\,W r S'... VENUE L�'. i.: r 10 MILES \. --- Wells _ r1o,� i _ �_• C h G poi P n P P eo L Q 0 J V G �ow `b C � ¢¢ �.... •• O .coq',... t 'O_• \' Rte. f C)�� 72 1 \\ �� , ..: / µ{el, ". •i: -.. Trailer Park eld vE well o d� / wei1.. v 'n 1 bo �... O cr I. i 0 . :3T I 32 ° CASE No y l ... •,� 1 - cf � ( \�1`�0 � TAM. _— •dery 50: r Js ej AvENUEa Well well . �', o 41Z O �l 3 _l 0 Q� o.____ LA QUINTA,..! ALIF: HE /4 PALM DESERT 15' CtUADRANCLE e ' a� N3337.5— W11611/7.5 1959 1. PHOTOREVISED 1980 o , r b_ 38 DMA 2751 111 NE— SERIES V895' o Ir !1 I�JtLi!•L R /. Q C3 SJf /.t ti I s n6 •. 11�•fJ '� I11• I . SI M °A/ \ e _ 1 v� 1 ; par. 2 # e /3 ►� 49,, -2,4c Gr li h i EXHrerr , �r F._. 1 CASE NO�► r�N r� � •c� (D 79. J* Ac Ar- AV 46 y \ � r 0.95 05 Ac. AV a,. .� I . SI M °A/ \ e _ 1 v� 1 ; par. 2 # e /3 ►� 49,, -2,4c Gr li h i EXHrerr , �r F._. 1 CASE NO�► r�N r� � •c� (D 79. J* Ac ir I I i I I I i I � S E P 2 6 1991 UTY OF LA Gl, NTA PLANNING KPARTMENT EXHIBIT CASE NO. �l — PLAN —a m a MCI!_ Y'� - RIF I I I . . ........ ID t. p 2 6 19 91 L 1 G i T Yw 77. 7, 7! r Ao EXHIBIT -CASE NO IN i lb ��•n :�.�::t Sri � ..�`y�ItM��iT;=wYww'. 'i:; �� i �. � Cr a �� s os Y �'� �_� ' w O J. S E P 2 6 1991 1 j . - *�-� -�� J"Y ""F '..p. (,U-;-�rA OETARTMEAr EXHIBIT _CASE NO. I - II EEL= tIj IOU SEP 2 6 1991 jv�2;, QiT EXHIBIT CA'SENO.ql-4(J- coo L!n a I- w EXHIBIT CASE NO..JL_�� =- 'L4''r]�vR•.^Latu':.ati Y.1!•nwoe :'6�:x11R.'�lV1Y ,.,?� JUL 2 6 1991 o ff moll, o0 siuK e,� �cesrwwcwuT - ._. �eywt tau .o� CG ttC tb e - !i; f�, s O i w w Air-of j.j FZ JUL 2 6 1991 EXHIBIT -a. CASE NO. ��L w JUL 26 1991 -I-- -- � i-:-_ -- EXHIBIT - ].h CASE NOID EXHIBIT CASE Cml JUL 2 6 1991' �orMMK G�.11L'R 8Jt! }-� ..;r I • �r�rie� _ 1 mac,_._ 1 iMllf • • • • • �11 13 13 11 KrstA�rc.wt ♦ atoms - FLcio� PL..Atl �e 1 �a Y t �� rJ w. r d'7Rro� e=' 2 6 1991 EXHIBIT CASE NO--l- I t-o-/Llf44 e�eWfEX - FOL-44%off, PLAW ol = I 3 Las 4 owe 34 w w. Dear Mayor Pena: As you are no doubt aware, Simon Plaza, Inc. has a design review application pending before the City to allow construction of a restaurant /banking facility, a three story medical office building, a two story recreational facility, as well as an attendant parking structure to service each of the foregoing buildings. This parcel, currently in escrow, is owned by 3S Partnership which consists of Fred Simon, John Sanborn and myself, and Pomona First Federal. In general, the proposed development has been well received by the City staff, as well as many other residents and officials of the City with whom we have shared it. The staff has requested additional information which is currently being assembled and will be forwarded to them promptly. In addition, Simon Plaza and City staff are having ongoing discussions dealing with the City policy, contained in the General Plan, which provides that the City should pursue low density (low level) structures along major arterials. We understand that the City policy is to require one story structures within 150 feet of the property line. It is further our .understanding -that under appropriate circumstances the City Council may modify that.policy if such modification, on balance, serves the interests of the City. I am writing this letter to you because of the long history of discussions and correspondence you, Mr. Simon, Pomona and I. have had with respect to the property and the Washington Street Corridor Plan of the City. The purpose of this letter is to review that history and to point out why we believe a modification PTS15482 BEST, BEST & KRIEGER A FMI%KPS ✓ —C—O .Ap0E114-0'WAL pp.nOA rOp 4 LAWYERS ARTHUR L. LITTLEWORTH• DOUGLAS S. PHILLIPS' WILLIAM O DAHLING. JR, KENNETH R. WEISS 600 EAST TAHOUITZ CANYON WAY GLEN E. STEPHENS' ANTONIA GRAPHOS TERESA J. PRtS1OJKOVK J. CRAIG JOHNSON POST OFFICE BOX 2710 WILLIAM R. D.wOLFE' GREGORY K. WILKINSON VICTORIA N. KING SUSAN C. NAUSS PALM SPRINOS. CALIFORNIA 92263 BARTON C. GAUT' WYNNE S. FURTH MATT H. MORRIS CHRISTOPHER DODSON TELEPHONE 325.7264 PAUL 1. SELZER' DAVID L. BARON JEFFREY V. DUNN MARK R. NOWE (619) DALLAS 14OLIAES* VIRGINIA A. PHILUPS STEVEN C. D.BAUN BERNIE L. WILLIAMSON TELECOPIER (619) 325-0365 CHRISTOPHER L. CARPENTER' EUGENE TANAKA BRAN H. DYE MN ELAINE E. HILL RKHARO T. ANDERSON' ,BASIL T. CHAPMAN ERIC L. GARNER WILLIAM J. ADAMS JOHN 0. WAHLIN• TIMOTHY M. CONNOR DENNIS M. COTA WANDA S. Mc NEIL MICHAEL O. HARRIS* VICTOR L. WOLF JULIE HAYWARD BIGGS KEVIN K. RANDOLPH W. CURT EALY' DANIEL E. OLIVIER RACHELLE J. NICOLLE EUGENIA J. MORE221 THOMAS S. SLOVAK' DANIEL J. McHUGH ROBERT W. HARGREAVES JAMES B. GILPIN OF COUNSEL JOHN E. BROWN' HOWARD S. GOLDS JANICE L. WEIS - JAMES M. KEARNEY JAMES B. CORISON MICHAEL T. RIDDELL* STEPHEN P. DEITSCH CHRISTIAN E. HEARN MARSHALL S. RUDOLPH RICHARD A. OSHINS' MEREDITH A. JURY' MARC E. EMPET SHALRYL WALKER KIM A. BYRENS RONALD T. VERA MICHAEL GRANT' JOHN R. ROTTSCHAEFER PATRICK W. PEARCE CYNTHIA M. GERMANO FRANCIS J. BAUM- MARTIN A. MUELLER KIRK W. SMITH MARY E. GILSTRAP •AO"TTEO r -AW YOWL 1."ADA, ANNE 1. THOMAS' J. MICHAEL SUMMERDUR KLYSTA J. POWELL - GINEVRA C. MARUM WAIT «OTtP . D.C. ca>" Of CLAIw D. MARTIN NETHERY- JEFFERY J. CRANDALL JASON 0. DABAREINER DANIEL C. PARKER. JR. GEORGE M. REYES SCOTT C. SMITH HAYDN WINSTON NGUYEN 0. PHAN WILLIAM W. FLOYD. JR. JACK B. CLARKE DAVID A. PRENTICE PAUL G. GIBSON MICHAEL A. CRISTE' JEANNETTE A. PETERSON KYLE A. SNOW CRAIG S. DYNES GREGORY L. HAROKE BRIAN M. LEWIS MARK A. EASTER CHARLES E. KOLLER OFFICES IN KENDALL H. M.c VEY BRADLEY E. NEUFELD DIANE L. FINLEY CLARK H. ALSOP GEOFFREY K. WILLIS MICHELLE OUELLETTE RAYMOND BEST (3868 -1957) RIVERSIDE (711)686.1190 DAVID J. ERWIN' KANDY LEE ALLEN PETER M. BARMACK JAMES H. KRIEGER 0911.19751 RANCHO MIRAGE (619)568 -2611 MICHAEL J. ANOELSON' ELISE K. TRAYNUM DAVID P. PHIPPEN EUGENE BEST (1893-19811 ONTARIO 0] 4) 989.8581 'A.AOEEtgO -A CO./'OAAT-O. September 5, 1991 --` John J. Pena, Mayor City La ry ;;. ?^ .4. nF11__0D+!r�1T nra? of Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor Pena: As you are no doubt aware, Simon Plaza, Inc. has a design review application pending before the City to allow construction of a restaurant /banking facility, a three story medical office building, a two story recreational facility, as well as an attendant parking structure to service each of the foregoing buildings. This parcel, currently in escrow, is owned by 3S Partnership which consists of Fred Simon, John Sanborn and myself, and Pomona First Federal. In general, the proposed development has been well received by the City staff, as well as many other residents and officials of the City with whom we have shared it. The staff has requested additional information which is currently being assembled and will be forwarded to them promptly. In addition, Simon Plaza and City staff are having ongoing discussions dealing with the City policy, contained in the General Plan, which provides that the City should pursue low density (low level) structures along major arterials. We understand that the City policy is to require one story structures within 150 feet of the property line. It is further our .understanding -that under appropriate circumstances the City Council may modify that.policy if such modification, on balance, serves the interests of the City. I am writing this letter to you because of the long history of discussions and correspondence you, Mr. Simon, Pomona and I. have had with respect to the property and the Washington Street Corridor Plan of the City. The purpose of this letter is to review that history and to point out why we believe a modification PTS15482 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEGI.. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 2 of the City policy with respect to building height, in this case, serves the interest of both the City and the developer. As you will recall, this property was subdivided pursuant to the terms of Parcel Map 18418 in 1982, shortly after the incorporation of the City. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that Map, the 3S Company, and Pomona, the owner of Parcel 6 of that Parcel map were required by the City to make certain dedications of rights of way along. Washington Street and Highway 111 and to improve those rights of way with paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and traffic light modifications. In addition, of course, we were required to install water and sewer improvements to serve not only our property, but also other properties in the area. Those improvements were later installed at substantial expense to us. In early 1986, we became aware that the city was considering an amendment to its General Plan which would adopt as • part thereof the Washington Street Corridor Plan which would have • significant impact upon our properties. As the attached correspondence will attest, we violently objected, and informed the city that we believed that they city could not exact additional rights of way and improvements from us,. and that if it adopted and implemented the proposed plan, it could not count on our project to voluntarily, or as a condition of development, dedicate or improve the-rights of way which. would have been required to implement the plan. We had several meetings with the staff at that time, and went to considerable time and expense in preparing and presenting plans which were alternatives to those set forth in the Washington Street Corridor plan. We were assured that nothing would happen without further discussions with us. Unfortunately, in 1987, and without notice to us, the City adopted a plan which resulted in a proposed widening of Washington. When we became aware of the change, we immediately contacted you and the City Manager, and again reiterated our position that we did not intend to dedicate or improve any addition right of way along either Washington Street or Highway 111; that we had an absolute vested right to develop our property in a fashion consistent with our approved Parcel Map and the zoning applicable to the property at the time we began development, and that if the City really intended to implement its plan for Washington, it should plan on condemning the property, because we would not dedicate it. We also pointed out that with the Washington Street Plan in place, and the set backs required along both Washington Street and Highway 111, the parcel owned by Pomona, and our parcel situated adjacent to Washington Street had become virtually undevelopable, and would result in a claim by us and Pomona that the remainder of those parcels not taken for street expansion had PTS15482 LAW oriiCES or BEST, BEST Q KRIEGE. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 3 been rendered virtually useless resulting in a claim by us and Pomona that the remainder had been taken by inverse condemnation. Thereafter, we had several meetings with both you and the City Manager. At a meeting held on October 1, 1990 with Mr. Kiedrowski, the City Manager, we informed him that we had several potential buyers for the property, but that we were unable to proceed with any one of them until the issue of the Washington Street right of way and set backs had been resolved. He told us, that it was unlikely that the matter could be resolved without specific development plans being submitted to the City, and he encouraged us to prepare a plan which would accommodate the needs of both the city and the owner of the property. He specifically told us that he thought that the matter could be resolved to the satisfaction of both the city and us if each of us was mindful of the concerns of the other. He acknowledged that the right of way issue was of concern to the city, and suggested that if we were willing to compromise with respect to the dedication, the city might very well be willing to compromise with development standards which might otherwise be applicable to the property. He urged us to keep in touch with the City as our plans progressed. Based upon our discussions with both Mr. Kiedrowski and you, we have worked assiduously to plan a development for the corner which will serve the interests of both the City and ourselves. That plan is embodied in the documents which we have submitted to the City for review and approval, and includes the dedication by us of Washington Street to its planned width as desired by the City. It should be noted that in order for us to accomplish the plan, we have agreed to purchase the Pomona parcel so that we can offer the dedication and develop the property as an integrated project. In return, we are requesting that the city policy regarding height in this area be modified. We believe that our proposed development will be a significant asset to the city and will result in a project on this most important intersection at the entrance to the cove in which the city may well be proud. We think that this is truly a win -win solution to our mutual problem. The City gets its right of way, and both we and the city get a quality development with which we may both be very pleased and satisfied. In the event the city is unwilling to modify its policy regarding height in this area, we will have no alternative other than to return to development of our portion of the property within the parcels as set forth in our approved map, and consistent with the applicable zoning ordinance and policies in effect at the time. In such event, we will not be in a position to purchase the Pomona parcel or to dedicate the Washington Street frontage. Pomona will PIS15482 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST d KRIEGE.. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 4 undoubtedly develop its parcel independent of us. Furthermore. we are of the legal opinion that the City may not, in such event, require the dedication as a condition of the development. We believe that this alternative is a lose -lose proposal. The city does not get its right of way, and both the city and we get a development which will not match what we are currently proposing in terms of quality. We hope that we are not left in this position. As always, we remain ready, willing and able to meet with you, the City Council, the Planning Commission and staff at any time to discuss the matter further. If additional information is desired, please give me a call, and we will respond immediately. We are most anxious to have this matter resolved at the earliest possible time. Since 1986, we have entered into agreements to sell the property to three separate buyers. Each one of them has walked away from the transaction because of the uncertainty surrounding the dedication and set back issues. We hope that we can finally put this matter behind us. Thank you for your consideration of this most important matter. Yours very truly, Paul T. PTS /ssk Enclosures cc: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager ✓Jerry Herman, City Planner Gilbert F. Smith, Pomona First Federal Philip M. Pead, Simon Plaza, Inc. Fred Simon, 3S Partnership John Sanborn, 3S Partnership PTS15482 a Mr. John J. Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear John: ��1�lG�f ClC I��LlUlltil;� � PONTIAC Tp� July 22, 1986 I would like to acknowledge your correspondence of July . 18, 1986, in reference to the road design of Highway Ill/ Washington Street Intersection. We are in the process of the final negotiations of selling the property to a developer and it would certainly be beneficial to get some commercial property established on that corner as soon as possible. I am sure that with the interest you have expressed in your letter, once we have a Developer's Plan suitable for submission, we can move ahead for final consideration. I will continue in-my efforts and hope we can get develop- ment started with the City's assistance. Sincerely, SIMON MOTORS, INC. red J. Simon President FJS:mec CC: City Council Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager Larry Stevens, Community Development Director Robert Weddle, City Engineer • ' John Sanborn, Sanborn /Webb Paul Selzer, Best, Best & Krieger Bob Nichols, Pomona.First Federal "The Home of Personal Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78 -611 Highway 111, La Quinta, Califomia 92253 (619) 346 -2345 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (619) 564.2246 July 18, 1986 Fred J. Simon, Simon Motors, P. 0. Box 1461 La Quinta, CA Dear Fred: President Inc. 92253 Pursuant to your request, the Community Development Department has reviewed both of your proposed revisions to the road design at the Highway 111 /Washington Street intersection. The City appreciates your efforts in preparing alternative designs for the area which take into consideration both your concerns about additional right -of -way and community concerns relating to traffic safety. With regards to the designs proposed by Sanborn /Webb, they represent acceptable design possibilities for the Washington Street corridor near the Highway 111 intersection. Each generally provides for adequate capacity. and uses accepted traffic design standards. Each would also be considered as consistent with the adopted Washington Street Specific Plan. You should be aware that it was not the purpose of the Washington Street Specific Plan to select a precise road design and no such design has been determined at this time. The.Specific Plan was intended to provide general design and right -of -way criteria for the corridor and any number of design alternatives, including those prepared by Sanborn /Webb, will be considered in the upcoming phases of plan implementation. While it is premature to select a particular design at this time, please be assured that it is certainly the City's intent to minimize potential right -of -way acquisition to give due consideration to existing improvements, to carefully evaluate impacts on affected property owners and to minimize road improvement costs in the ultimate improvement of this important road corridor. The City is currently preparing a precise alignment study and a financing feasibility study and, following that, experts to prepare improvement plans in its efforts to improve the Washington Street corridor to at least a four -lane condition as soon as possible. In the event that your desire to secure approvals for and develop the Washington Street frontage parcels would occur prior to the completion of these studies, the City will attempt to resolve the Fred Simon, President Simon Motors, Inc. July 18, 1986 Page 2. precise design issues as part of any development application that would be submitted for the affected parcels. It is expected that the general comments on the Sanborn /Webb revisions would provide adequate guidance to prepare site development designs suitable for submittal. In preparing those plans, you should feel free to work with Larry Stevens, Community Development Director, and Bob Weddle, City Engineer, in order to minimize the impact of changes that typically occur through the development review process. It is hoped that this response gives you adequate assurance that we can work in concert in resolving mutual concerns along this very important corridor. I believe that we can achieve our common goals best by continuing to work together. Your interest in resolving any differences and continuing to progress towards mutually acceptable solutions is appreciated. Sincerely, ohn J . en /GY Mayor G JJP:LLS:dmv cc: City Council Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager Larry Stevens, Community Development Director Robert Weddle, City Engineer John Sanborn, Sanborn /Webb Paul Selzer Bob Nichols Pomona First Federa Savings and Loan Association Since 1892 July 3, 1986 Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quin ta, Calif. 92253 Re: Widening of Washington Avenue Dear Mayor Pena: Pomona First Federal has received a copy of the plans submitted on behalf of Simon Motors, Inc. in regard to the proposed Washington Avenue widening. Although this would still have a detrimental affect on our property, it is much more acceptable than the previous action taken by the City. It appears that the Groves traffic study, includ- ing projections for traffic through the year 2035, is more realistic than other reports received by the City. The Plan submitted by Mr. Simons substantially re- duces'the cost to the city and permits property usage which would result in additional taxes for the city. It also renders our property as being immediately usable rather than unuseable as will result under your present plan and would result in a lower acquisition costs. Our Board of Directors has not had a meeting to discuss the amended plan submitted by Mr. Simon, but I feel confident that it will meet with much more approval by the Board than the present plan. Thanking you in advance for consideration of the pro- posed plan by the La Quinta City Council, I remain WGB,JR:ps Very truly yours, WILLIAM G. BERGMAN, JR. Vice Chairman of the Boa d of Directors of Pomona Firs Federal Savings and Loan Association Administrative Offices: 350 South Garey Avenue • P.O. 9o: 1520 • Pcnone. Ca;.Icr- a 9'769 • t7141 623.2323 • 12131 625 -7666 • 1618; 464.7800 • 17141 972.0521 June 26, 1936 Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Qa Post Office Box 1504 , d La Quinta, CA. 92253 4 p5 �} I1 Dear John: icy Enclosed is a work -up that Mr. John Sanborn has completed after visiting with Judith Cox and Larry Allen of the City Council, and Larry Stevens of your Planning Department. The plan submitted to you on June 13, 1986, revised the original plan developed by B.S.I. and your Planning Department, which severely cut the property on the corner of Washington and Highway 111. After submitting our revision and attending the projected traffic study by the Groves, Mr. Sanborn and Mr.. Selzer visited with the three individuals mentioned ab'.pve, and from their discussions, Mr. Sanborn made several additional revisions which show adaquet lanes to accept the traffic patterns as outlined in his correspondence dated June 24, 1986, a copy of which is attached along with revision number 2 by the property owners. I think this plan makes alot of islands are sufficiently wide at six the traffic patterns adaquetly. The property is needed to accomodate the our first revision and therefore les be necessary in acquiring this land. sense because the median feet, and would seperate end results are that less traffic patterns than.on s cost to the City would Even with this revision, Pomona 1st Federal would lose 4050 square feet and 3S loses 6400 square feet, in comparison to the original plan submitted and approve.d by the City Council which would be well over an acre or close to 50,000 square feet." I hope you will all take this into consideration and allow us to discuss this matter with you if there are any additional questions. Sincerely, SIMON MOTORS, INC. aw Fred J. Simon President "The Home of Personal Service" cc • Nichols P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway 1 1 1 , La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 3 ?,04 rn e zer Stevens w Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA. 92253 Dear Sir: �+P l(l(J l((l po�lni�c TRUCKS June 13,, 1986 This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of June 12, 1986, relative to the changes adopted on the corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street, that have taken such a large protion of the land from the East side of the corner, that it renders the parcels owned by Pomona lst Federal, unbuildable. It also severely disects the parcel owned by 3S on the corner of Simon Drive and Washington Street, which again would make it questionable as to whether or not it would be useable as a commercial site. I have submitted a revised plan to you that has been worked up by Sanborn Webb, Inc., which we think works. It also limits the loss of property to the two owners and would reduce substantially, the cost of acquiring the parcels, by the City of La Quinta, in order to do the plan that was originally adopted. We have included a study done by the Groves that was submitted to the City and was accepted by you as a traffic study for Washington Street. It varies quite drastically from the one B. S.. I. is now submitting for the Washington Street corridor. The groves projection, projects considerably less traffic than the B. S. I., and we, for the sake of common sense, can not see Washington Street carrying more traffic than Highway 111 in future years, and that in essence, is what their study and your planner have done with the configurations on the current plan. Our recommendations have many advantageous points that should be taken into consideration. 1) Adequately covers the traffic project for Washington Street. 2) Allows for stacking on the corner. 3) Eliminates severe loss of property by owners of corner. 4) Reduces cost to City tremendously. 5) Logically allows solutions to problem, so we can proceed with developing the corner immediately. 6) With the corner developed, we can begin to bring revenue into the City, rather than taking revenue out of the City's coffers. 7) Continues to solve the problem for the people at "Point Happy ". "The Home of Personal Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway I 1 1 , La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 346 -2345 � t •'fs elf Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA. 92253 Dear Sir: �+P l(l(J l((l po�lni�c TRUCKS June 13,, 1986 This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of June 12, 1986, relative to the changes adopted on the corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street, that have taken such a large protion of the land from the East side of the corner, that it renders the parcels owned by Pomona lst Federal, unbuildable. It also severely disects the parcel owned by 3S on the corner of Simon Drive and Washington Street, which again would make it questionable as to whether or not it would be useable as a commercial site. I have submitted a revised plan to you that has been worked up by Sanborn Webb, Inc., which we think works. It also limits the loss of property to the two owners and would reduce substantially, the cost of acquiring the parcels, by the City of La Quinta, in order to do the plan that was originally adopted. We have included a study done by the Groves that was submitted to the City and was accepted by you as a traffic study for Washington Street. It varies quite drastically from the one B. S.. I. is now submitting for the Washington Street corridor. The groves projection, projects considerably less traffic than the B. S. I., and we, for the sake of common sense, can not see Washington Street carrying more traffic than Highway 111 in future years, and that in essence, is what their study and your planner have done with the configurations on the current plan. Our recommendations have many advantageous points that should be taken into consideration. 1) Adequately covers the traffic project for Washington Street. 2) Allows for stacking on the corner. 3) Eliminates severe loss of property by owners of corner. 4) Reduces cost to City tremendously. 5) Logically allows solutions to problem, so we can proceed with developing the corner immediately. 6) With the corner developed, we can begin to bring revenue into the City, rather than taking revenue out of the City's coffers. 7) Continues to solve the problem for the people at "Point Happy ". "The Home of Personal Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway I 1 1 , La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 346 -2345 Mr. John Pena June 13, 1986 Page 2 All in all, this alternative plan resolves the problem at "Point Happy ". It resolves the problem of traffic stacking. It resolves the problem logically for all concerned and limits the need for acquiring entirely the two parcels affected. I hope you can personally participate and I am asking Mr. Bob Nichols of Pomona 1st Federal, Paul Selzer and John Sanborn of 3S, to personally participate with your Planning Department and your City Council to correct this problem as quickly as possible so that we may proceed to develope the land and bring revenue into the City!! FJS:mer cc: Bob Nichols Paul Selzer John Sanborn Larry Stevens Sincerely, SIMON MOTORS, NC. Fred J Presid A 25, 1906 Cit.; ccuncil City of La Qi:inl--a La Q--linta, C-. 92253 LAW C)rl,iCCS or BEST. NEST C. K R I E G E C C; 0 Ea,,T T b 1- I I Z - W Z C A L. LU M %Y,',Y F, C C C Y. 27:0 t-! f F P I I : 5 S C A L I VO n I A ! A 0 E L E P F 0 Z - C'. E "j." 2 -- ;5 TLLEY 7SZ;'3-r Deer .. ":Pvo-,,- and 1 : of the Council: LE C 3(.7-16 LC!. 1: C V C ') ). t r r Fz C E r 2'L Th's office re✓rcscn4 tl,, 3S Co:7.jFn)- a?d S' -,.on Fc-mily I r T N, are tm- o-.,7nc-f.s 0 Pcrccls 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and Parcel 1';::) 1841.6' rest ectivel-..', arid this letter is written in j;)(!Sed 172S i-- Amendment to the 4 'ton S,,- Corrie, both the City Council and C0- c: J. o r. -. v a F- FubI. -- -- llearinc-s in connect.-on v-ith the City lies edopted t'n..-it t0 C 17 T. ^ 1.0 I-, C- 1'V, neither the 3S C=,.pG nv ., E i.1 r e c e i - ia � n o ,: i c c of ar y Iu` 1 c c. C, C C, C c-'- C - - 0 n t C) t 1, e • ,-- 0 po S Z" to follc,-.,::*.I'.-: '%:o wc.-Y-2 E.-iven L of L J. C 0 c 11 ; nn d , N ,,I I I- C). ., 1 1 - I - - on !-d the so,-�th Sid C, 11, i'� h :I s I, o C. I 1 1 S 1, C, C ell of the I? p C, n t i 1: 0 v ,:iron the Of- vnsM.nc�ton Street w1hile thy' benefi"- C) +j 1s <(.)J(qv t:c) t,'jo o,--n ers of property we s t o! -Oct.; anJ, 17 i t ha S t, 1 L2 S n 1. s s C"., C. r 7, I-, i sot C) C S V L P 1 7 • V j C E C L A., C C'I C L A 25, 1906 Cit.; ccuncil City of La Qi:inl--a La Q--linta, C-. 92253 LAW C)rl,iCCS or BEST. NEST C. K R I E G E C C; 0 Ea,,T T b 1- I I Z - W Z C A L. LU M %Y,',Y F, C C C Y. 27:0 t-! f F P I I : 5 S C A L I VO n I A ! A 0 E L E P F 0 Z - C'. E "j." 2 -- ;5 TLLEY 7SZ;'3-r Deer .. ":Pvo-,,- and 1 : of the Council: LE C 3(.7-16 LC!. 1: C V C ') ). t r r Fz C E r 2'L Th's office re✓rcscn4 tl,, 3S Co:7.jFn)- a?d S' -,.on Fc-mily I r T N, are tm- o-.,7nc-f.s 0 Pcrccls 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and Parcel 1';::) 1841.6' rest ectivel-..', arid this letter is written in j;)(!Sed 172S i-- Amendment to the 4 'ton S,,- Corrie, both the City Council and C0- c: J. o r. -. v a F- FubI. -- -- llearinc-s in connect.-on v-ith the City lies edopted t'n..-it t0 C 17 T. ^ 1.0 I-, C- 1'V, neither the 3S C=,.pG nv ., E i.1 r e c e i - ia � n o ,: i c c of ar y Iu` 1 c c. C, C C, C c-'- C - - 0 n t C) t 1, e • ,-- 0 po S Z" to follc,-.,::*.I'.-: '%:o wc.-Y-2 E.-iven L of L J. C 0 c 11 ; nn d , N ,,I I I- C). ., 1 1 - I - - on !-d the so,-�th Sid C, 11, i'� h :I s I, o C. I 1 1 S 1, C, C ell of the I? p C, n t i 1: 0 v ,:iron the Of- vnsM.nc�ton Street w1hile thy' benefi"- C) +j 1s <(.)J(qv t:c) t,'jo o,--n ers of property we s t o! -Oct.; anJ, 17 i t ha S t, 1 L2 S n 1. s s C"., C. r 7, I-, i sot C) C S V (Jvv colinc - *.l April. l_), 1986 )"'LL! Tv :o 5. The exi < ;tence of the General Plen A- .iend7,ent so significantly clouds the ti '-le to the proper. ti -es o-.:ned by my clients as to r.lal ;e it unmarketable. In view of the foregoing v,_: voul.d respectfully request that the City reopen the He-lrings on this ratter after properly giving notice to each o�:ner entitled thereto in order that we r:1ay have apple opportunity to p:-esrnt evidence and -il.ternati-ves to those plans reco:=. ,ended by the Plann:i-ng Co =nissi -on and apparently adopted by the City Council in its SpLcif-ic Plan Nu -:fiber 86 -007. 1.7hil.e we wish to cooperate with the City in its ndeavors to iT- nprove the area, I am sure you v'ill understand ou,_ concern wl'en ve fo-.:nd out after the fact that after having already dedicated 36 lent along t..ashingtoll Street, five feet along High -ay 111 and installing curbs, stutters, sidewalks and traffic signals all at si €;nificant eypense ar..-} all within the last three years, the City no-..I wisles to tear out all of that work and render valueless at least tvo of tale parcels .•ith Parcel }lap Nu::lber 18418 all without notice to us. In vie-,.7 of the drastic economic effects this is having on our clients ,zt the- present tine, we would respectfully request an early response to this letter. Ban': you for your prompt consideration of this natter. 1ov.rs very truly, li'"ST, BEST i KRIEGER T. elzer P'i S t s cc . Jo'1:1 S -'jorn h1"C (I S.L...D11 bcc: Gilbert Smith, P�^:ona First Federal title. The application shall be placed -on the regular agen- da of the F fining commission as a dis sion matter for the determinati" of the commission. If the- commission approves the waiver, the applicant shall be permitted to file an ap- plication for any required plot plan, conditional use permit or land division. (Ord. 5 51(part), 1982: county Ordinance 348 59.52) 9.88.050 Development standards. The following shall be the standards of development in the C -P -S zones: A. There is.no minimum lot area requirement, unless specifically required by zone classification for a particu- lar area. B. There are no yard requirements for buildings which do not exceed thirty -five feet in height, except *as required for specific plans. Any portion of a building which exceeds thirty -five feet in height shall be set back from the front, rear and side lot lines not less than two.feet for each foot by which the height exceeds thirty -five feet. The front setback shall be measured from the existing street line un- less a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be measured from the specific .plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line ad- joins a street, the rear setback requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line or from an existing adjacent street line unless a specific plan has been adopted in which case it will be measured from the specific plan street line. C. All buildings and structures shall not exceed fifty feet in height, unless a height up to seventy -five feet is specifically permitted under the provisions of Chapter 9.i92 of this title. D. Automobile storage space,shall.be..provided as re- quired by Chapter 9.160 of this title. E. All roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a minimum sight distance of one thousand three hundred twenty feet. (Ord. 5 Sl(part), 1982: county Ordinance 348 §9.53) Chapter 9.90 C -V ZONE (COMMERCIAL VILLAGE) Sections: 9.90.010 G lly. 9.90.015 Purpo 9.90.020 Permitte S. 9.90.030 Accessory u ermitted. 9.90.040 Commercial and ifamily plot plan review required. 9.90.050 Design review require 9.90.060 Development standards. 9.90.070 Subzones. 9.90.071 C -V -C "The core" subzone. 9.90.072 C -V -P "The park" subzone. 9.90.073 C -V -S "South" subzone. 9.90.074 C -V -N "North" subzone. 9.90.080 G V7' ►�`w . ,�-� v • Recording, Requested By And After Recording Return To: BEST, BEST h KRIEGER (PTS) 600 E. 'Tahquitz McCallum Way :A Palm Springs, CA, 92262 O L17 +ig C m ` • • .-� �v CC � � r COVENANTS, CONDITIONS b RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1983, by and between FRED J. SIMON, hereinafter.referred to as "Simon" and POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, hereinafter referred to as ''Pomona". 4 RECITALS 1. The parties hereto each have ran interest in adjoining, parcels of real estate located in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside. State of California, described respectively as follows: A. Parcels 2, 3. 4, S and 1 of Parcel Map 18418 as recorded in Parcel Map Rook .1, Pages through S"O records of Riverside County, California. ( "the Simon Parcels ") B. Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 18418, recorded in Parcel Map Rook // 5. Pages thr,)ugh F �^ (/ records of Riverside Count;, California. ( "the Pomona Parcel ") -1- I- i C. All of the parcels collectively shall i hereafter be referred to as "the Project ". 2. The parties hereto desire :o create a commcn driveway and walkway affecting the above - described adjoining lots owned by there, for the benefit of each of them. ".,4e 3. The parties deem it desirable to create a general plan for the maintenance, protection, use, occupancy, operation and enjoyment of the Project an a first - class shopping, center and for that purpose do hereby establish, adopt and im- pose Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions .end Easements upon all of the parcels for the purpose of enforcing, protecting, and preserving the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Project.. A. CREATION OF EASEMENTS. 1. A non - exclusive easement for walkway and drive- way purposes in favor.of the Pomona.Parcel is hereby created over and across the Simon Parcels, which said easement is delineated "PRIVATE D/W EASEMENT b DRAINAGE EASEMENT" on said Parcel Map 18418, and a non - exclusive easement for walkway and driveway purposes in favor of the Simon Parcels is hereby created over and across the Pomona Parcel, which Raid easement is delineated "PRIVATE D/W EASEMENT & DRAINAGE EASE:ME;ST" on said Parcel Map 13418. 2. The owner of each of the Parcels (Parcels 2, 3. 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Parcel 1-1ap 18418) shall construct driveway, curhs and putters upon the easement locates: on the parcel owned by it at or before such time as a building, is constructed -2- upon the Parcel. All such improvements shall be constructed l ell, in accordance with the requirements from time -to -time estab- L1 lished by the City of La Quinta, California; provided, however, that any improvements so constructed shall not alter or obstru ,7t one freg flow of traffic over said easement. 3. The owner of each of the parcels above described shall maintain the portion of the easement located upon his property; ;provided, however, that the owner of Parcel b shall not pay the cost of maintaining the easement located upon its property, but shall, instead, pay ore -half (1/2) of the cost of maintaining that portion of the easement shown on Exhibit "A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, which is cross - hatched; and, provided further, that the owners of Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 may, by a separate document duly executed by each of said owners, properly acknowledged and recorded, modify their respective obligations with respect to the maintenance of said easement so long as such document assures that the burden of maintaining 0.e entire easement (excluding, one -half (1/2) of the cost of maintaining the cross- hatched area as set forth in Exhibit "A ") shall be borne by the owners of said parcels. (As an example only, the o•,rners of Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 may choose to form an Owner's Asso- ciation which shall be.ohligated to maintain the easement). As used herein, the term " maintenance" shall mean that fr. ;prove- ments constructed thereon shall be kept in good order and repair and free of debris as a result of periodic sweeping. 4. The easements herein created are appurtenant to each parcel above - described (Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5. 6 and 7 of -3- V"' Parcel Map 18418) and for the non - exclusive use of the owners Lb Cof each of said parcels, their guests,, invitees, and the L7 oblignttons herein contained with respect to construction and maintenance of said easements shall constitute covenants which run with the land. 11. USE RESTRICTIONS. 1. Neither the Project nor any part thereof, nor any parcel contained therein shall be used nor shall Any building or other improvement be constructed, maintained or used for any purpose other than the following: retail, office and service. establishments, including without limitation, financial institu- tions, brokerage offices, restaurants, travel and similar agencies, motion picture theaters, clothing and appliance stores, speciality retail shops, supermarkets, drug stores and related or similar establishments. It is the intent of this Declaration to allow any commercial or business use or purpose which F_s common to a first -class shopping center and which is not prohibited by law; provided, however, that automobile service stations and fast food restaurants shall not be considered permitted uses. 2. No sign. s,--mbol, advertisement or billboard shall be displaved, constructed, used, maintained, erected, posted, or permitted on or about any portion of the Project except one or more.signs for each business operating in the Project which ident_Cies the name, business or svmbol of such business, which does not advertise any particala r item of merchandise, (other than as may ue contained in the customary tradename of an u :cupant), which is harmonious to the general exterior archi- tectural treatment of the buildings in the Project which is of -4- a type, size and design commonly found in first -class shopping M centers in California. Nothing herein shall.prevent any owner G LO from placing, "for sale" or "for lease" and /or .elated marketing signs on any parcel which an owner is attempting to sell in a the Project. So luny, as Parcel 6 is used as a bank or savings institution, a time and temperature sign. r,irect.onal signs for n drive -up window and automatic teller machine identification signs shall be permitted on that Parcel. 3. No owner shall pertr.it or suffer an,•thing to be done or kept on his parcel which will obstruct or interfere with the rights of other owners, their lessees, custon,'! s, guests, business invitees, and sublessees or annoy them by unreasonable noises or otherwise, nor will he commit or hermit any nuisance on his parcel or commit or suffer any immoral or illegal act to be committed thereon. Each owner shall comply with all of the requirements of other governmental entities having, juris- diction with respect to his parcel. 4. No rubbish, trash or other waste materials shall be kept c.►-permitted upon any parcel, except in sanitary con - tainers located in appropriate areas screened and concealed from view. No tools or equipment shall be kept or permitted upon any parcel. except within buildings or behind storage walls. 5. Each owner shall maintain his respective parcel and the improvements located thereon in a neat, clean, properly painted, safe, sanitary and attractive manner. 6. No ot,.-T,cr shall do or commit any act which would impede or impair the free flow of vehicular or pedestrinn traffic over the easements described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, -5- to the end that the customers of Lhe businesses established C N on each parcel will have free access to each parcel in the troject. 1. No hedge, tree, shrub, plant or other landscnping shall be planted, nor shall any fence or wall be installed, erected or maintained on any parcel in such a location or of such height so as to unreasonably obstruct the visibility of improvements on any other parcel. C. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 1. The owner of any Parcel in the Project shall . have the right to enforce by proceedings at law or in equity all of the covenants and provisions now or hereafter imposed by this Declaration including, without limitation, the right to prosecute a proceeding, at law or in equity against the person. or persons who have violated or who are attempting, to violate any of the covenants, to enjoin or prevent them from doing, so, to cause said violation to be remedied and /or to recover damages for said violation. The result of every act or omission whereby any of the covenants contained in this Declaration are violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be and constitutes a nuisance and every remedy allowed by law or equity against a nuisance either public or private shall be applicable against every such result and may be exercised by any owner. Tile failure to enforce any of the covenants contained in this Declaration shall not constitute a waiver of the right to enforce the same thereafter. -A breach of the covenants contained in this Declaration ::hal.l not affect or impair the lien or charge of a bonafide mortgnge or deed of trust made in good faith and for value on any parcel; provided, however, that any subsequent -6- owner of such parcel shall he bound by said covenant, whether or not such owner's title was ncquired by a foreclosure, a trustee's tb sale or otherwise. :7 2. The covenants set forth in this Declaration shall run with and bind the Project, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the owner of any land subject to this �. DerI..rntion, their respective legal representatives, heirs, suc- •,�ssorc and assigns, for n term of fifty (50) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, sinless an .instrument signed by the then record fee owners of and beneficiaries of first trust deeds encumbering not less than seventy -five of the land area of the Project terminating said Declaration is executed and recorded. 3. This Declaration may be cancelled, changed, modi- fied-or amended in whole or in part only by a written and recorded agreement executed by the then record fee owners and beneficiaries of first trust deeds encumbering not less than seventy -five percent (75 %) of the land area of the Project. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections C2 and C3 set forth hereinabove, any modification, change, cancellation or termination hereof shall require the written consent of the owner of the Pomona Parcel; provided, however, that the owners of the Simon Parcels may impose additional covenants, conditions and restricrions on the Simon parcels without the consent of the owner of the Pomona Parcel, so long as the Additional covenants, conditions or restriction., do not affect the use of the Pomona Parcel or diminish the rights under this Agreement of the owner of the Pomona Parcel or its guests or invitees. -7- .x h S. If any owner defaults in the performance or observation of any of the covenants set forth in this Declaration, and any owner has.obtained the services of an attorney with respect to the defaults involved, the prevailing party shall be r LOLL .led to recover all costs or fees incurred, including, reason -ible attorneys' fees, regardless of whether legal pro- ceedings are instituted. In case a suit is instituted, the prevailing, party shall also be entitled to recover all costs of suit in addition to the aforesaid costs and fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement at Palm Springs, California on the day and vear first above written. , ptIKlAIStA� PO`tONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND YIrGINIA L G1AISTER LOAN ASSOCIATION .�,, tea �rGttlt CMfti'• Rv I r ( 1' l jti yt.Cc�� „� M (t(nrH Avg A 19l�E 1 L By -8- _S..V.iAo`:, C W) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) As. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On / , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary un c nand for said State, personally appeared FRED J. S17.0N, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whooe nmmn is subscribed to the within instrument and acknow- ledged to me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. FM kt we Or�� y 4L itYM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On '1� 0A �`�_ 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Not Pub inn in for said State, personally appeared ! personally known to me or proved — s ac o to be the person who executed the within instrument as the and personally khown to me or proved to me on the basis of satis- factory evidence to be he rso wh executed the within instrument as the Sir. of the corporation that executed the within instrument and a— cknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. 14ITNESS my hand and .official seal. ORKIAl SM VIRGINIA L. GLAISTER 1t)Tri�� I,01gr►11SIM f�11F CWMA I(I ANC.111% MAtv top on Aq A. 19PE 1KV�TI.WC -9- oj CITY Or LC OWNT4 , Oc ME CCUMry a- RMEAMV , 1407E a' CAUFOCV14 .� "CAROL /Y1A..PiY0.1B418 �y /A ffrl^ ? A O/Y/S /Lw v'- ~A'r_rz / OfPA.KE! MAP iYO. S rlr .VECZWAgS OF R / ✓E•vS /OECO!/NTY, !'AUFOiPN /A S /TiGO>E� /NTJNf NE %6 �� qF 5ZCr 1ON .10, T_ S S. /v 7E, X B. B. t M. -' ,^V/z• /'BS YY,EBB ENG '/Y.EFR /NG, /NC, s`" `° • _ _ _ �' % /Y /,..r/a ! `= �.'-�, L• `rte n•wrlt —" I I /,• -rl/ . . 1J .•r .Z •fir /' \ /r� • A[a /OI � !.►1 Wulf! ih0✓/O ay..l�..vcl, Yom.• . i ♦• I /- dlM.Vtea- %A J A'/ Ja ,Y1 M /Y•. i. /C !�I - !/I'M!/� /J %! p/.I.I lO I! IAI:.W.v7.�.}•llwKNllo• J�O+ /Y'•"ollJ 0.r OW •//1.–.-GI ` -' •' le.0 !alp ,Ms !!!J J•"- P+lrnLYKl i •r/- JOl--- •lNI.�/YMOlJ ,,,,. i.i �•. •/ ' • '� • C!. Avast /[ 7 :�- /r,N /pV //M!f .••V aV/_V�J• -!✓ ,I:/ /.N•+P✓J AKM' +l�v /I - BAS /J OF BfA�ViN _ ��" `� 1 A.v Jp ,4/1./1!0 .yv /.-!! �.M.•. •.• -, C% (th >M l/1lly lO.vll i IO O.' /.•O- o ...W+/Il f.IiJr7l rr lro A"— r e, a yea ll � w,la..�+f•re .. /M.Yl..• /i 1.111! t /!J .•!llJl t. +d�GI /O A+1O !�! %O..•�O'n0 J /r!! I /OG /O If _I! JL //•I I I /,• -rl/ . . 1J .•r .Z •fir /' \ /r� • A[a /OI � !.►1 Wulf! ih0✓/O ay..l�..vcl, Yom.• . TWO lb J tl �i M � Exhibii —a ' _ Y/�' /N /TY MAP 50367 e i .T/ N- o•T,./J a•/M.•vl r. /.w.q�q/ lw/I•./ ✓ /1OI /i-I /J I /- dlM.Vtea- %A J A'/ Ja ,Y1 M /Y•. i. /C !�I - !/I'M!/� /J %! p/.I.I lO I! IAI:.W.v7.�.}•llwKNllo• J�O+ /Y'•"ollJ 0.r OW •//1.–.-GI ` -' •' le.0 !alp ,Ms !!!J J•"- P+lrnLYKl i •r/- JOl--- •lNI.�/YMOlJ ,,,,. i.i �•. •/ • 1! ^N! /!.•! .�L•+•!, aw •Y.�lll /!! %ll /11M /.•Y -/!l l�� /.W . :�- /r,N /pV //M!f .••V aV/_V�J• -!✓ ,I:/ /.N•+P✓J AKM' +l�v /I - TWO lb J tl �i M � Exhibii —a ' _ Y/�' /N /TY MAP 50367 e O WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO POMONA RW FOM SAYINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 2869 POMONA, CA. 91769 nor 7 'Pe DEED OF TRUST 9 WITH RIDERS ATTACHED \ THIS DEED OF TRUST Is made this .....» 24T r.. ... ».. .....der of......FE$RUARY 19 83 &Moog the ��AS PER EIQiI A A?'I'AC, R HERETO AND BADE /► PART HEREOF ..... -... .......(herein "Borrower"), POMONA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. (hereto 'Z`eustse and the Beneficiary, POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVIN48 AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a corporation organised and slating under the laws of the United States, whose address Is 899 Noah Gamy Amue, Pomoru, California (herein "Lender"). Boaaowss, In consideration of the Indebtedness berain recited and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and convey* to Trusts@ in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in the County of ........... .. ..... Al1Xl! ii9. 1�F............... ....»... .... ...... ... .,........ state of CalUorniu M PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18410 recorded in Book 113 pages 49 &50 of Parcel Maps. n) JARCELS 1, 4, S AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP N0. 18418 recorded in Book 113 pages 49 &50 Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, CA. (A) THIS DEED OF TRUST IS TO BE EFFECTIVE AS A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED AS A ry FIXTURE FILING COVERING THE FOLLOWING TYPES OR ITEMS OF PROPERTYr AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS; OVERHEAD REEL ASSEMBLIES; UNDERGROUND TANKS AND PUMPING UNITS; FLUID INVENTORY CONTROL. SYSTEM; COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM; FLOOR EXHAUST SYSTEM; BENCHES AND VICESI FRONT END EQUIPMENT; WASTE OIL SYSTEM; OVERHEAD RAIL SYSTEMI PARTS DEPARTMENT FUkNISHINGSI BEIBER LIGHTING FIXTURESI TUBE SYSTEHI CONVEYOR BELT; BODY AND FAINT SHOP EQUIPMENT; INTERCOM SYSTEM FOR SERVICE DISPATCHING; TOGETHER WITH ALL EQUIPMENT OF LIKE KINDS OR TYPES WHENEVER ACQUIRED BY DEBTOR BY WAY OF REPLACEMENT, SUBSTITUTION, ADDITION, OR OTHERWISE, AND ALL ADDITIONS AND ACCESSIONS THERETO. (B) THE ABOVE GOODS ARE OR ARE TO BECOME FIXTURES ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (C) NAME OF DEBTOR IS TRUSTOR ABOVEI ADDRESS OF DEBTOR 18 78 -611 HIGHWAY 111, LA QUINTA. NAME AND ADDRESS OF SECURED PARTY IS THAT OF BENEFICIARY ABOVE. IN THE EVENT THAT THE REAL PROPERTY ENCUMBERED BY THIS DEED OF TRUST SHALL BE SOLD AT TRUSTEE'S SALE UNDER THE POWER OF SALE CONTAINED HEREIN OR SHALL BE SOLD BY JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE, THEN ALL LOTS OR PARCELS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO THIS DEED OF TRUST SHALL BE SOLD AS ONE PIECE OF REAL PROPERTY AND SHALL NOT BE SOLD SEPARATELAY UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY BENEFICIARY AND THEN IN THE ORDER BENEFICIARY SHALL SPECIFY. which has the address of......... ,78 -611 HIGHWAY 111 ...... .LA QUINTA ............... . ........ Iah.Ml .., ...IQhI '" CA 9225] .... .. ....- „ -„ »(herein "Property Address "); Toosrstsa with all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all easements, rights, appurtenances, rent* (subject however to the rights and authorities given heroin to Lender to collect and apply much rents), royalties, mineral, oil and gas rights and profits, water, water rights, and water stock, and all fix- tures now or hereafter attached to the property, all of which, including replacements and additions thereto, &hall be deemed to be and remain a part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust; and all of the fore- going, together with said property (or the leasehold estate U this Deed of Trust is on a leasehold) are hereto referred to as the "Property "I To Sscuas to Lender (a) the repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by Borrower's note dated........ (herein "Note "), In the principal sum of..T.K..VALIr,IO(t SEVEN HUNDRED with interest thereon, providing for monthly Installments of principal and interest, with the balance of the Indebtedness, if not sooner paid, due and payable on ...- A.PAIL...1....19AB ........ ..................; the payment of all other sums, with interest thereon, advanced In accordance herewith to protoct the security of this Deed of Trust; and the performance of the covenants and agreements of Borrower herein contained; and (b) the repayment of any future advances, with Interest thereon, made to Borrower by Lender pursuant to para- graph 21 hereof (herein "Future Advances "). Borrower covenants that Borrower {!o lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property, that the Property 1p mnncumbered, and that Borrower will warrant and de. fend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to any declarations, ease- ments or restrictions listed In a schedule of exceptions to coverage in any title insurance policy insuring Lender's interest in the Property. CALIFORNIA — i to t ramiti — sirs — raw wm we uMiromw aura mw 1111 •IY /•W IM ■ �. a, cy,�. 1�/ .N -. ption to pay the rums secured by ibis I Trust shall r••nllnue unimpaired. Upon errcb ayma►t a a by dorrowa, this Deed 01 Trust and Ow oblipiknn ucu ed b..._j $hall remain In full force and effect as If no aoceteratb occurred. Ise. Aselp�rnewt of Rents Alp -6 d Reealvert Len/vr is Pawsaioa. As addltlonal security nernmder, Borrower bereby amlent to Lender Ilse min of L Prr"My, provided that Borrower shall, prior to acceleration under ansrapb 11 berwf or abut• dooment of the Property, have the right to collect and raisin such rewo u they become due and ayebb. Upon acceleration under perattraph it hereof or abandonment of the Property. Lander. in Ivreoa. by agent or by judicially appointed receiver shall be entitled to enter upon, take posauslon of and manap tM Property and to eoltect the rents of tine Property including those put due. All rents collected by Lender or the receiver shall be applied first to payment of the cosu of management of •he Property and collection of rents. includin but cot limited to. receiver's feek remlums rm receivers bonds and rest unable attor• set's feu, and than to the rams seaweed by lX Dad of True. Leader and rise nodve. shall be IIsWe to aecotnt only for those rents aduall received. 7t. Future Advances. Upon request of Borrower Lander at Lenders option price to fall recosvey"" of the Property by Trustee to Sorrowo.. may mate Future Advances to l;orroww. Such Future Advances. with Into. therms. shall be acnrad by. this Deed of Trust when evidenced by praniaory notcq stating that aid sotto aft eatltred bereby. IL Ret'nwveyance. Upon payment of ail sumo secured by this Deed of Trust, Lender shall requet Trustee to recoavty the Property and s;• d1 surrender this Deed d Trust trend all notes evidencing Indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust to Trusts. True - tee %hall renmvey the Property without warranty and wltbout ebuq to the anon or nacre Ieplly entitled thereto. Such pe. or perwonq +mall pay dl costs of recordation. R any. 27. ltubAtisfe Trostte. Lender at Lenders option, stay from time to lima remove Trustee and appoint a ruce"wr tnww to any Trustee appointed hereunder. Without conveyance of roperty, the ancemor irusPne shall succeed to all Ilya title, power and Out* mnferrad upon the Trustee herein and by eppilcable law. 24. RegwM for NoOM Bomnwx requss I rise Coosa of fbe notla of ttdaull vied mo" of oak be sent to Sorrows addnu -` %rah Is the P.uperty Addreat. IS. ttateasenl of Obiloodi a. Lander may e0at a fa not to exceed 1115 for Ntalabisg the statement of obligation at prorided by Section 2943 of the Civil Code of California. Tx Wrrn= WntotsoP, Borrower hast necuted this Deed elf TxuaR SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF STATXOF CALIFORNIA . ......... ....................... I .... I ............. . ......... . ........ ..County "I On this.. .......... .............. ..day of............ .. ....................19........, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public inand for said State, personally appeared ................................«..»«.........«................................ ............................... ............ ................................ ........................ ................ known tome to be the persona) whose name (a) ....................... ».subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged t hat ............ .......................executed the sumo. WiTNrmmy hand and official seal. Signature: .......................«.................,............. ............................... ttteaaved ter Official wit Nerve lypad t prtatad) My Commission expires: TO TRUSTEE: REQUEST FOR RECONVEYANCE The undersigned is the holder of the note or notes secured by this Deed of Treat. Said note or notes, to• gether with all other indebtedness secured by this Deed of Taut have been paid in full. You are hereby di• rected to cancel said note or notes and this Deed of Trust which are delivered hereby, and to reconve , without warranty, all the estate now held by you under this bead of Trust to the person or persons legally entitled thereto. Dated: ...................................................... .......................................................................... ............................... okam Be► w The Ur* Pamer.,W For load" art liaw..dart •_ _. r.........�... I��I...... Yh/Y. a......t ",elm law.la. oil EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 24, 19R3, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,752,450.00 EXECUTED BY THE SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AS TO PARCEL 1 OF a PARCEL MAP NO. 18418 AND THE 3 -8 COMPANY, A- ARTNERSHIP AS TO PARCELS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18418, 11ERRIN CALLED TRUSTORS, IN FAVOR OF POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A UNITED STATES CORPORATION, HEREIN CALLED BENEFICIARY. POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN - ^SSOCIATiON RIDER TO ADJUSTABLE RATE NOTE AND DEED OF TRUST Pomona First Federal Loan No. Date: FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned ("Borrower') agrees) that the following provisions chali be incorporated Into the deed of trust of evert date to which this Rider Is attached (hereinafter the "Deed of Trust-) as wen as the note which said Deed of Trust secures (hereinafter the "Note'). So long as this Rider shall remain In effect, to the extent that Its provi- sions are Inconsistent with the provisions of the Deed of Trust or Note, the provisions of this Rider shall prevail and shall supersede any such Inconsistent provisions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the provisions of this Rider ate Inconsistent with any other rider(s) executed as part of the same loan transaction. then the other rider(%) shall prevail and supersede any such Inconsistent provisions In this Rider. Dutlag such time that the Dad of Trust or Note, of any pan of tho indebtedness evidenced by the Note are held by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Federal National 14cttbage Association or the Government National Mortgage Association. or their successors, the provisions of this Rider shall be suspended and be of no force or effect. Pomona First Federal (Lender) makes no representation that It will attempt to auign, +r ..refer or sell said Note or Deed of Trust and Is under no obligation to do so. 1. Uniform Deed of Trott Governing [awl !ievembility. Paragraph IS of the Deed of Trust Is amended In Its entirety to read as follows: "IS. Uniform Deed d Trust{ Governing Law{ SeverabWty. The loan secured by this Deed of Trust is made pursuant to the laws of the United States and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, Including the federal laws, rules and regulations for federal savings and loan assoelations and, so long as the Note or any part of the indebtedness evidenced thereby is held by a federal savings and loan aswcintlon, the loan contract between the parties. Including this Deed of Trust. and the Note and any other obligation that this Dad of Trust secures, shall be construed and governed by such laws, rules and regulations. If any paragraph, clause or provision of this Deed of Trust or the Note or any other notes or obligations secured by this Deed of Trust is construed or interpreted by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void. Invalid or unenforceable, such decision shall affect only those para- graphs, clauses or provisions so construed or interpreted and shall not affect the remaining paragraphs, clauses and provisions of this Deed of Trust or the. Note or other notes or obligations secured by this Deed of Trust." 2. Transfer of Property{ Ann.. ptlon. k Paragraph 17 of the Decd of Trust, and as said paragraph Is set forth in the Note, is amended by deleting in its entirety the next to the last sentence of said paragraph. The sentence hereby deleted reads as follows: "Such notice shall pro- vide a period of not less than 30 days from the date the notice Is mailed within which borrower may pay the sum% declared �ue. "Furthet. this Ipwill 1lgted langyge appearin{ !n Sectic rt 3(B)Y life Dote Is deleted in Its entirety as follow %a' Th e at e c Q not as ^an thin 1130 days from the date such not ce • tna a 3. Aeceleratlont Remedies. Paragraph 18 of the Decd of Trust Is amended by deleting certain language which appears In (3). of the first acn- tence of paragraph 18, no language hereby deleted from (3) reads as follows: ".. , not less than 30 days from the date the notice is mailed to Borrower." 4. Borrowers Right to Relnatate. Paragraph 19 of the Deed of Trust is deleted in Its entirety. 3. Reeonveyanee. The second sentence of paragraph 22 of the Decd of Trust Is amended In Its entirety to read as folloWx "Trustee shall reconvey the property without warranty and with reasonable charge to the person or persons legally entitled thereto." b. iratement of Oblilpstion. Paragraph 25 of the Decd of Trust is amended in Its entirety to read as follow%: "25. Statement of Obligation. Lender may collect a fee of 115 0 or such greater maximum amount ns Is allowed by law for furnishing any statement of obligation, beneficiary'% statement, beneficiary'% demnnd , or any other statement regarding the condition of or balance owing under the Note or secured by this Decd of Trust." rill -*+ +_ ! y K B. Notice by Fird Class Man. Section 1 of the Note and Section 14 of the Deed of Trust are amended such that any notice required to be given by certified mail may be satisfied if notice Is given by first class mail postage prepaid. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has executed this Rider to Adjustable Rate Note and Dacd of Trust. SEE. REVERSE. SIDE Snnnwrr norrowrt r c� SIMON FAMILY ARTNERSHIP A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP c ` By Fred S on t- / R Smon� By r Erwoo By •- .z��..' ,tom Fred S Tryon, Jr. 4.4 By Simon Family,Partnership, a General Partnership By Fred J: Simon By� R L.. S n B k -w& Terr r Erwoo / By «�d.Fre Je S mon, Jr. M.D.. L c POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION ADJUSTABLE RATE LOAN RIDER NOTICEt THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE. INCREASES IN THE INTEREST RATE WII'. RESULT IN HIGHER PAYMENTS. DECREASES IN THE INTEREST RATE WILL RESULT IN LOWER PAYMENTS. a THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR A BALLOON PAYMENT AT MATURITY This Rider is made this 24TH day of TERRUARY , 19 83 . and is incorporated into and shall be de 'med to amend and supplement the Deeo ('Trust rust of the same date given by the undersigned (the "Borrower ") to secure Borrower's Note of the x2me date to POMONA FIRST FEDERAL_ SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION (the "Lender ') and covering the property described in the Deed of Trust and located at 78 -611 HIG11WAY 111 LA OUINTA. CA 92233 Property Address MODIFICATIONS. In addition to the covenants and agreements made in the Deed of Trust, Borrower and Lender further covenant and agree as followst I. INTEREST RATE AND MONTHLY PAYMENT CHANGESi RENEWAL OPTION. The pro- visions governing the interest r-fe, changes in the interest rate and monthly payments, and renewal options are set fort:: in Sections 2, 3, 4, and S of Borrowor's Note given to Lender, which provisions are as followst 2. INTFREST. Interest will be charged on that part of the outstanding Prin- cipal which has not been paid. Interest will be charged beginning on the date I receive Principal and will continue to be charged until the full amount of Principal I receive has been paid. Beginning on the date of this Note, I will pay interest at a yearly rate of Fi.FVF.N, percent ( 11.000 ) (hereinafter' the "Initial Interest Rate "). During the initial five (S) year term of this Note, the interest rate that I will pay will change in accordance with Section CAS of this Note. Interest rate changes during said initial. five (S) year term shall occur on the FIRST day of the month beginnin on JUNE. 1, 1933 , an ay on that of the month every three (3) months s erea er. Each date on which the interest rate may change during said initial five (5) year term will be called an "Interest Rate Change Date." The Interest rate that I will pay upon and subsequent to any Renewal Option Date may also change) such interest rate will be established pursuant to Section 4(B) of this Note. 3. PAYMENTS. (A) TIME 4ND PLACE. I will pay Principal and interest at the office of Lender at 399 North Garey Avenue. Pomona. California, or at a different place if required by the Note holder, by making payments every month. I will make my monthly payments on the _ FIRST dny of each month beginning on 14AY i , will nuke these payments until I have paid all of the Principal and Interest and any other charges, described below, that 1 may owe under this Note. I will pay any remaining indebtedness, if not sooner paid. no later than APRIL 1, 1998 , unless I have exercised the Renews Option n accordance with ect on 5 of this Note. (B) LATE PAYMENTS. If the Note holder has not received the full amount of any of my monthly payments by the close of Note holder's normal business hours, twenty (20) calendar days after the date it is due, I will pay a late charge to the Note holder of ten percent (10 %) of ray overdue payment of Prin- cipal and interest. I will pay this late charge only once on any late payment. If I do not pay the full amount of any monthly payment on time, and the payment remains unpaid after a date specified in a written notice to me. the entire Prin- cipal amount and accrued Interest thereon shall at once become due and payable at the option of the Note holder. The date specified shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date such notice Is mailo.d. The Note holder may exercise this option to accelerate during any default by me, even If the Note holder did not exercise this option to accelerate during any prior default by me. I will pay the Note hold r for all reasonable costs and expenses, including. without limita- tion, reasonable attorney's fees, which Note holder incurs In attempting to collect this Note. r (C) PREPAYMENTS. I may make additional payments on the Note on any payment date) provided, however, that the Note holder may charge an additional sum not to exceed six (6) months' advance interest (at the then current interest rate) on the amount prepaid in any twelve (12) month period in excess of twenty percent (201) of the origins' amount of this Notel provided further, however, that I may pay the remaining amount of this Nots In full, without obligation to pay any additional sum, during any ninety (90) day period prior to any Renewal Option Date. (D) AMOUNT`OF MONTHLY PAYMENTS. My initial monthly payments will be In the amount of THENTY 51X 'THOUSAND NINE. IRWRFO SEVENTY TIGi1T AND 1401100 Dollars (U.S, S 26 s Interest rate a pay changes, e ar,ilint of my moo y payments will change correspondingly an that my monthly Ewill always be in an amount adequate to repay the remaining Principal balance of this Note, including interest_ at the rate then in effect, over the remaining term of the 25 -year amortization period. My monthly payment of Prin- cepat and interest is subject to change on each Interest Rate Change Date and additionally on each Renewal Option Date (and, thereafter, pursuant to Section 5 of this Note), based on changes in the interest rate I pay. 1. INTEREST RATE CHANGES. (A) INITIAL FIVE (5) YEAR TERM. Any changes in the Interest rate during the initial five (5) year term of this Note are mandatory and will be based on changes in an Interest rate index which will be called the "Index." The Index Is the 19-60 month maturity Long -T,irm Credit fixed Interest rate quotation pub- lished by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. If the Index ceases to be made available by the publisher or by any successor in Interest to the pub- lisher, then the long -Term Credit fixed Interest rate quotation published by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco for the term that Includes or exceeds a period of five (5) years will be used to set the Interest rate of this Note. To set the new Interest rate effective on each Interest Rate Change Date, the Note holder will determine the change between the "Initial Index" figure and the "Current Index' figure. The Initial Index figure Is TF.N 6 ONF.- ItA1.E percent ( 10.5001), The Current Index figure Is the Index guTi re in eT%c.t on the t rs ay of the month preceding the month In which there Is an Interest Rate Change Date. If the Current Index figure Is higher than the Initial Index figure, the Note holder will add the amount of the change to the Initial Interest Rate. It the Current Index figure Is lower than the Initial Index figure, the Note holder will subtract the amount of the change from the Initial Interest Rate. The result of this addition or subtraction will be the new interest rate and may also result in an increase or decrease In my' monthly payment amount. Notwithstanding the above, the Interest rate I pay during the initial five (5) year term of this Note will always be one -half of one percent (.51) higher than the applicable Index figure. The first Interest Rate Change Date shall be JUNE. 1 1981 , with subsequent Interest Rate Changes occurring every three months there- after. Each new interest rate and cny change in my monthly payment as a result of a change In the interest rate will become effective on the Interest Rate Change Date. If my monthly payment Is to change because of a change in the interest rate, the Note holder will mail me a notice by first class mail, postage prepaid (which may, but need not, be certified or registered). The notice wilt advise me oft (1) the new Interest ratel (2) the amount of my new monthly paymentl and (3) any additional matters the Note holder is required to disclose. (B) SUBSEQUENT FIVE (S) YEAR TERMS. If I exercise the Renewal Option pursuant to Section S of this Note. I will pay interest at the lowest Inter- est rate formula offered by Note holder on the applicable Renewal Option Date for similar types of commercial property loans. The interest rate I pay during any five (5) year Renewal Option period may be fixed or mdy he adjustable, depend - Ing upon the terms offered by the Note holder for similar types of commercial property loans on the Renewal Option Date. S. RENEWAL OPTION. The Renewal Option Date Is the due date of this Note or any five (5) year renewal therenf. Although the remaining Principal balance of this Note and accured interest thereon shall be all due and payable five (5) years from the date of this Note, I shall have the option to renew this loan four (1) consecutive times for five (5) years for each renewal period. I agree that any such renewal shall. be upon such terms as Note holder normally requires and that the interest rate I will pay during any renewal period will he at the lowest interest rate formula then offered by Note holder for simi- lar types of commercial property bans. (Thk area for official notarial aal) CAI. NO. %400430 TO 1N6 CA 17- 1J1 1. fP�.rtnership) STATE OF CALIF NIA . j � L COUNTY OF J. On �% 3 It it, �,�, said te, rsr +pall} peacal i� �TM OtSURANCE ANDTWJS7 •*�+�+� my the undersigned, a No ry Public 'n and for C9 , personally kno to me or C proved to me on the basis of 4tatisf2etory nidence to be LO the +erson w u executed th`, within instrumcnt ax 4-4m partners Of the partnership th.t executed the within instrumcnt, and r-•knowlcilged to me that such executed the %Attic. "I IL partnership 1M.CUM . WITNESS my hand and official seal, BWOE OM � Signature (This area for official notarial «al) CAT. NO. NN00630 TO 1946 CA 17 -621 ' INSURANCII (Partnership) �TM AND TRUST STATE: OF CAI. RN % 1 ^1Vei`aide •now►cewr. COUNTI' OF On March /► , 1983 liefOrc me, the undcrsi fir in nd for * t. i� pub said State, personally appearc,l SIMON, RAW* and' SR. , RA .« TERRI ERWOOD M , personally known its mc'Or C proved to me on the bAsts of xAtisfactory evidence to be L7 the person 8 whO exccutc+l the within instrument as rhrep Of the partners Of the partnership OfHOtK/G� that executed the within inxtrutttent, and Acknowledged to me that such partnership cxecutcd the same. �TJIRYNNJi,CAti�M • WITNESS my hand and Official scat. i\ ly Olnlltl Lrpha Apr, It, 1WS Sigma ture) \ i�� (Thk area for official notarial aal) .M t� C U7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA as. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On March 11 , 1983, before me, the under- signed., a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared FRED J. SIMON, SR., personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person whoso name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in Fact of FRED J. SIMON, JR., M.D., known to mn.to be one of the General Partners of THE SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, the partnership that exacutcd the within instrument on behalf of said partnership, and acknowledged that he subscribed the name of FRED J. SIMON, JR., M.D. thereto as principal and his own name as Attorney in Fact. WITNESS my hand and offical seal. '�1 r OFFICIAL�SI:AL DIANNA CONNERLY NOTARY P0LIC - GAL!fL`Ztd!A RNP510': COUNN My t�+:,m. t•'ires APR ... 1 "T :LATE OF CALIFORNIA ) p COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) L7 On March 11 1983, before me, the under- _.____ signed, a Ngqtaryc• u c .n an or said State, personally appeared FRET' J. SIMON, SR., personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in Fact of FRED J. SIMON, JR.,, M.D.., known to me to be one of the General Partners of THE SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, the partnership that exe,,•-cd the within instrument on behalf of said partnership, said partnership being known to me to be one of the partners of .THE 3S CODTANY, the partnership that executed the same, and acknowledged that he subscribed the name of FRED J. SIMON, JR., M.D. thereto as principal and his own name as Attorney in Fact. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SF.\T, -�?�• , DIANNA CONNERw I .ti•,;; NOTARY PuAiC • C.1U '.::.% coasre `•y�•_.�. � COmr. t�i.t�:FR : !nil . r 6194511694 r CONSULTANTS INC F -687 199 P -002 MAR 17 192 09:34 re- s dI0MY 111 and WASHINGTON STREET The COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE grants t m. :_ ":C;= corporation. all that rea' property v_r;, .. :�••�• :l ::• :4 ::S follows: That portion of that southwest oee- :uar:!' Vv :•a 5:.:•'.:s: .•!- :.t•:1' of Section 19, T. S S., R. T E.. S.B.M., oescrite: is f:" :•s: I coaeoncing at the intersection of _rs s:a:•!•'; ''•t :' ss': i.t.v!- "r with easterly Tina of Washington Street ;EJ :: fee: • "!. Thence H. 69 °22'09 E., along said SC::•e'1� -�''! :' ie:. :• - .'s:!•:e of 26.00 feet to the TRITE .POINT OF BEG'SSING, Thence continuing Y• 69421'09" E., aic^; Sal! s: . ^ :- •e :' ss Section 19, a distance of 103.14 feet to a - pint :! i':e•se: • .'+ .••�s'e• line Of State Highway yo. 111 (110 feat wide;, $a': :i• : :e"; : '. - :�•; :•� t0ecavt soucSttesterly and taring a radius of 232 ?. :: `es:; Thence northwesterly along said sout!•aiiste'1y 141! :` : :3 :� '';'•s. '. . fma an initial radial Tine bearing r. 39°43'21" E.. t-01-4- a ti' !* !-;'s 02.061030, t distance of 95.06 feet; Thence S. 6313S'40"9., a distance of 41,1; fee:; Thence S. 00'21'58' E. Parallel with 114 H.:' --tofelt l:s:O•' :` �+es.'•.% . at right angles from. Said easterly lint of lies !!!gtC!: :: a .'3 :a� :4 :` . ^.i .feet to the true Point of beginning, Subject to an eastmnt for slopes and c:oer ►';'•as +-= '•'-e•: _ _ :sus u granted to tAe State of California by deed reccr'.e6 :411 *.;`z, is No 66831. Riverside County records. Subject to covenants, conditions. •es: ^ic:i : ^s, •es!•.s : : ^s, i :st•e - :s:- and rights-of-way of-record. Said parcel containing approxi�*ateiy 3:.::. :at s:.i•e • :. l STATE OF CALIMMIA ss. tDU!+TT 0? :,V: ?S :C: CDUNR OF RIVERSIDE �� Oa JuM '� )9 3y • Bel me. egg . as Gle k OT-We hair -an, sod : c. ..:s•v -s @card of Supervisors of the County of Immside, Sta 3 California. personally pF&M 7 to Pie to be so person 40 this instrument as the fls ma of the Board of Supervisors of said County, and acknowledged to me that . , tip Costnty of Riverside executed it. MU A. MALOW • Clerk of the Board of Supervisors �► Oep+►b f: +,a t ill 1� 1 l� - • . khan recorded, mail to: Foro. rirst Fodor*). Savings and r*an Association Vast Ofi:.:e box 110 Pomona, California 91769 Attni Jeuquio Palmor �l 1. lit Loan No, 10046992.2 Space Above This Line for Records Use 1, AGRXEMENT TO MODIFY THE TERN! OF NOTES AND DEEDS OF TRUST NOTICE TO OBLIGOR: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS FOR A VARIABLE INTEREST AND A BALLOON PAYMENT AT MATURITY. INCREASES IN THE INTEREST RATE WILL RESULT IN NIGHER PAYMENTS. DECREASES IN THE INTEREST RAT= WILL RESULT IN LOWER PAYMENTS. 1. This Agreement is dated as of March 14. 1985. -The undersigned hold title to the real property, described below, which is encumbered by a Dead of Trust dated February 24, 1983, recorded ira,Y -h v� . 1983. as Instrument No. iamim17� �__, Official Records of Rivnroldn I County, California, of which POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND IRAN ASSOCIATION (herein called "Lender ") is Beneficiary. Said Daed of Trust secures payment of an Adjustable Rate Note Vith Demand Feature in the original amount of Two Killion Seven Hundred Fifty -two Thousand Your Hundred Fifty and NO 1100 Dollars (42,752,450.00). The undersigned agree that the total unpaid principal balance of said Not 16 is %n "gig;_ e w h *hF2AA _ nig L hundred twonty onn t Dollars (U.S. 2.608.8?1.16 ) as of 1_:1,AA , 1988, with interest paid to 3 -1 -88 . 1988. Pursuant to the terms of said Note, the undersigned hereby agree with Lander to the following terms for this loan which shall be in effect during the first of the four (4) five (5) -year Renewal Option periods as specified in said Note. This document is incorporated into aid shall amend and supplement said Note and said Dead of Trust. Except as amended by the terms of this Agreement, said Note and said Deed of Trust remain unaffected, unchanged, and unimpaired. LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE A7rMa D Property Address: IA-All "Job "V III 1� ita� ray 2. This first of four (4) five (5) -year Renewal Option periods shall commence on April 1, 1988, and and March 31, 1993. If I fail to exer- cise the second option to renew this loan as provided in said Note. I will pay any remaining indebtedness, if not sooner paid, no later than April 1, 1993. 01385 03 -11 -88 -1- r ., 3. beginning on April 1, 1019, interest will'be charged on the unpaid Principal amount at a rate of . UJ% per annua (the *Initial Interest Rate'). The interest rate will bhangs during this first five (5) -yeas Renewal Option period in aeeoid .:xe with Section S of this Agreement. 'r Interest rate change* during said five (5) -year period shall occur on the _ first day of the month, beginning on October 1, 190!, and on the first d +y nt the month every six (6) swaths thereafter (the "Interest Rate Change Date'). 4. My first payment at my new interest rate shall be due May 1, 1989. My initial monthly paywnts will be in the amountlif (U.S. i 211-17d-7n ). If the interest rate that r"pay changes, the amount of my monthlp payments will change eorrsspondingly so that my monthly payments will always be in an amount adequate to repay the remaining Principal balance of this Mote, including interest at the rate then in effect, over the .remaining term of the original 25 -year amortisation period. My monthly payment of Principal and interest is subject to change on November 1, 1988, and on the first day of the month every six (6) months thereafter (the "Payment Change Date•). S. A. Any changes in the interest rate are mandatory and will bA based on changes in an interest rate index which will be called the 'Index.* The Index is the monthly weighted average cost of savings, borrowings, and advances made by the Federal Moms Loan bank of San Fran- cisco ("FHU-) to Sleventh District members of the FHI.b, as tabulated and published by the nU (also known as the 11th District Cost of Funds Index). If the Index ceases to be made available by the publisher, or by any successor to the publisher, the lender will set the Note Interest rate by using an index it deems comparable. A. To set the now interest rate, the Under will add 250 basis points (2.50X) to the Current Index. The Current Index is the most recent Index figure available on each Interest Rate Change Date. Not - withstandinl the precedinpt sentence, during this first five (5) -year Renewal Option period, the interest rate I pay will not exceed 13.902 per annum. Each new interest rate will become effective on the Inter- est Rate Change Date and each new monthly payment amount will become effective on the Payment Change Date immediately following the Interest Rate Change Date. C. 7b* Lander will mail as a notice by first class nail, pest - age prepaid (which may. but need not, be certified or registered) on or about each Interest Rate Change Date if the monthly payment is to change because of a change in the interest rate. The.notice will ad- vise as of (i) the new interest rate on Qy loan; (ii) the new amount of my monthly payment; and (iii) any, additional matters the Under is required or desires to disclose. 6. If the Lander does not receive the full amount of any of my month- ly payments by the close of Lander's Normal business hours, fifteen (15) days after the date it is due. I will pay a late charge to the Lender of ten percent (10X) of my overdue payment of Principal and interest. 01385 03.11.88 - 2 - . s a P1 PARCEL 1 OF FAMEL HAP N0. 18410 recorded in Book 113 pages 49 &50 of "Parcel Mans. ARCELS 1, � 4, S AND 7 OF P�CIL MAP NO. 184i8 recorded in nook 113 pages 49 &50 o pArce .ap•� Records u Riverside County, CA. (A% THIS DEED 17 *R'J4T IS TO It.IFETbC I'" AS I! WINANCINR STATEMENT FILED AS A FIXTURE FILING COVERING THE FOLLOWING TYPES OR ITEMS OF MPUTY& AUTOMOTIVE HOISTS{ OVERHEAD REEL ASSE?DLIES; UNDERGROUND TANKS AND PUMPING UNITS{ FLUID INVENTORY CONTROL SYSTEM{ COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM; FLWR LXHAUST SYSTEM= BENCHES AND VICES{ FRONT END EQUIPMENT{ WASTE OM SYSTEM; OVERHEAD RAIL SYSTEH; PARTS DEPARTMENT NURNISHINGS; BEIBER LIMING FIXTURES; TUBE SYSTEM; CONVEYOR BELT; BODY AND PAINT SHOP EQUIPMENT; INTERCOM SYSTEM FOR SERVICE DISPATCHING; TOGETHER WITH ALL EQUIPMENT OF LIKE KINDS OR TYPES WHENEVER ACQUIRED BY DEBTOR BY WAY OF REPLACEMENT, SUBSTITUTION, ADDITION, OR OTHERWISE, AND ALL ADDITIONS AND ACCESSIONS THERETO. (B) THE ABOVE COORS ARE OR ARE TO BECOME FIXTURES ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (C) NAME OF DEBTOR IS TRUSTOR ABOVE; ADC;;ESS 0* ORBTOR IS 7S••fitt HIGHWAY 111, LA QUINTA. NAME AND.ADDRESS OF SECURED PARTY IS THAT OF BENEFICIARY ABOVE. IN THE EVEX7 THAT THE REAL PROPERTY ENCUMBERED BY THIS DEED OF TRUST SHALL BE SOLD AT TRUSTEE'S SALE UNDER THE POWER OF SALE CONTAINED HEREIN OR SHALL BE SOLD BY JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE, THEN ALL LOTS OR PARCELS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO THIS DEED OF TRUST SHALL BE SOLD AS ONE PIECE OF REAL PROPERTY AND SHALL NOT BE SOLD SEPARATELAY UNLESS OTHERWISE PERHITTED BY BENEFICIARY AND THEN IN THE ORDER BENEFICIARY SHALL SPECIFY. Irl . * n e IN WITNUS WHIMF, the dnde=sip»d have hereunto fixed their hand and seal u of the date first above written. Siam Family Partner 1p, A General Partnership .A sY• 7 • cam• .h, Ll Fred Siao r., M.G. The 33 Coupany, A California Partnership Paul T. 5ez- z Johr Sanborn .• rtnership Fred Sim Jr., M.D. Accepted by POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINCS ANC LOAN ASSOCIATION By �C�1e vc�. 1 �,.o1fr. ay �'�• �. Sharon L. Statlor Kevin M:Carthy Its Its • Vioe President Vice President • 01385 03.11.98 3 • a tNW%AL ACKNOMKIDOMOff stag a C& rFd�HU �iysi ►� }es. counts i / t0 (intimsi, 9L MANNA Mt*MY 007W tou" • C"Osr" RIKRSIK Moll of tam soft Alit 2% IM r1N NM OtNR11AL ACKNOWL[OaMRNT sun of CAL I FOQN/A r county of_RllCEtS fb9 ss, 0� Lo MANNA OONNIRIY MANY ►VK1C • CAIKOMMA RIKRSIot ootRlly or cant. M M VII !L IM No a On this 1M . S_ day of �p11L__ _ .11/.rr. b.lore tree, the undets reed Notary Publicc, personally apps red Flew SiMN1 TAI SfMaM 14T"1110 Fat1D.. .T._SINes ?R., R.I. X personally known tome ' i proved to nN on the bats of satisfactory evidence lobe the parson(s) whose nW*S) _AR l____. subactlbed to the within Instrument. Mb acknowNdged that .TNiY ... o■oculed It WI SS Iny hand and oNlclal eat. Notfry'f 14�gnatun NAt�ow� rotAnv AaAewnoN • 12011 Vw*m SMW • PC as AAM • w......tt.ft CA %% A+40ft On this the -S_ day of _ ,c(.PR IL .. _ _. _.. 19 set. Delon me, ..._IH. -AM ._Fo.1._SAL3)__STAT.E ...._.... , the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared X personally known tome proved to me on the basis of Satisfactory evidence to be the persor.(s) whose names) 1iA% - subscribed to the within Instrument, and acknowledged that _TWQ Y_...._ _ executed it. WITN ERS my hand and official 1#81. Notary's Signaluri -- 7M W . NAl""t NOTARY A\MOMAWW4 • 13ot1 V0.MV.W4 • ►o e..4A1s • wneAMdNSA CA eta» . State ofyBL I FORMA County a ; — - -- I85 OF FMAL ZZAL DtANNA CO1AtY 1orAar aK • wUrat0 M w VIOU NO ZL M On this the Z .. day of � PRIs:__ . 19 It. before me, IN AND.- FOIL _SA LU__STATE.. the undersl ned Notary Public, personally appeared FRewSINoN Ttlttl SN+ou X pursonally known to me \\ proved to moon the basis of satisfactory evidence lobe the persons) whose names) AB!i subscribed to the within Instrument, and acknowledged that _.1iFl_! executed it. WI my hand and olllClal eat. • _.._ Notary's Signature 1n1 1"TONM WWAM AMOCtA"04 • M11 Vp"%os • PO e.. AM • w..wr4 N4 CA 1IM4411 .. rn { 1 I _ I ftimium nit ftRkvd 1 i STA 'vB OF CAI.IFOIINIA OuUN.: ov_ Los Angles • o.L�Apr,t A- 19U t)w urdrnlpwnt, a NOM Public In and ler Mil 9fS.._.__ T .brforr me, i sate, a�IY app• rd ■roa f.7 RI'at]Ar i prroonallr known so nw (or pveed in mp on dye book of •adsfactorr • +klenc�•) to b the Iwo plus e•� e toad the wi�hia in•truns•at •• �� ti o =.yd• nr ---won b•i+•If o(dw ca poc a Im thavLn a MrAan.t Kewin •tn .rehr i j pet« llr known to tn• (or p nvd to nw on Ihp ba %k ni .atid•ctorr widener) to be the pmm wlro e•vemW 0%, �. Ww" Instrums•tt sx _Yit:e PrseidtIlL o111CAtfiAt '+ Of oa Mh.lf •f for aorporatlan tlwnln aamcd, AM ackW194- Werd to tnr that this col pas atire 02ecut.d it pursuant to it. 4' CMBELLE d00MN WAN - by -laws or a rwoludoe *(Its board of dlncton• �► vpW�►Al Orti�Ct 0 tosasrotus<ootarrr W lTN M3 air bjml o(fk4I sr•1. 1!r d MIMn Ii11At Oet i,111Q •n•,n„•rj� jjgrabelle GoOnj&rporalkn) rnw Was for llM„w..,.rws+.tl EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED IICRETO AND MADE A PART OF DECD OF TRUST DATED W 01 FEBRUARY 24, 1983, IN T1IE AHOUNT OF $2,732,450.00 EXECUTED BY THE SI)ION FA`IILY PARTNERSHIP, A GEN9.RAL PARTNERSHIP AS TO PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18418 AND THE 3 —S COMPANYs A PARTNERSHIP AS TO PARCELS 2, 3, 4, S AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18418, HEREIN CALLED TRUSTORS, IN FAVOR OF POMMA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A UNITED STATES CORPORATION, HEREIN MLLED BENEFICIARY. Recording Requested By and L' r When Recorded Return to: ij 0 Pomona First Federal s Savin g ` .-�9v . C'7 and Loan Association Q Legal Department �, r ce • a In P.0 ; Box 2889 Z Pomona, CA 91789 s;� N N This space for Recorder's use only SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of March 1983, between FRED J. SIMON and the SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, a General Partnership, (hereinafter collectively called "Lessor ") , and SIMON MOTORS, INC., a California corporation (hereinafter called "Lessee ") . WHEREAS, FRED J. SIMON has sold to the SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP the real property legally described in the attached Exhibit "A" and hereinafter referred to as the "property "; and WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee have or are about to enter into an unrecorded lease whereby Lessor will lease, demise and let to Lessee all of the property (in- eluding{ improvements thereon); and WHEREAS, the SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP has executed, or is about to execute, a loan agreement together with a Deed of Trust and note in the sum of $ 2, 752 , 450.00 , dated February 24, 1983 , in favor of POMONA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, hereinafter called "Lender," payable with in- terest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which Deed of Trust is to be recorded contemporaneously here,vith; and WlIFREAS , it is a condition precedent to obtaining such loan that the Deed of O` 1, r . Trust shall be and remain a lien or charge upon the property hereinbefore described, 0 prior and superior to the lease between Lessor and Lessee, respecting the property; and WHEREAS, the Lender is willing to make such loan provided the Deed of As Trust to secure the same is a lien or charge upon the property prior and superior to the above described lease, and provided that the Lessee will specifically and uzicon- ditionally subordinate its leasehold estate and rights therein to the lien or charge of the Deed of Trust of the Lender. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other valuable con- sideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce the Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is agreed as follows: 1. The Deed of Trust securing the note in favor�of the Lender referred to above and any renewals or extensions of such Deed of Trust and the note secured thereby shall be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property herein described, prior and superior to the above described lease between Lessor and Lessee, 2. The Lessee acknowledges that he hereby intentionally waives, relinquishes, and subordinates the priority and superiority of the lease between Lessor and Lenses in favor of the lien or charge upon such land of the Deed of Trust in favor of the Lender, and that he understands that in reliance upon and in consideration of this waiver, relinquishment, and suhoridination specific loans and advances are being and will be made, and as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered into by third parties which would not be made or entered into but for such reliance upon the waiver, relinquishment, and subordination. The Lessee further acknowledges that the above described lease has by this instrument been sub- -2- • . li . 1 .a t l MW ordinsted to the lien or charge of the Deed of,Trust in favor of the Lender, p 3. The Lesseo hm reby declares that he has personal knowledge ledge of and hereby approves and consents to all the provisions of the loan agreement between the Lessor and the Lender, 4, This agreement contains the whole agreement between the parties her -to as to the Deed of Trust loan, and the priority thereof, over the above described lease' and there are no agreements, written or oral, outside or separate from this agreement, and all prior negotiations, if any, are merged into this agreement. b. This agreement shall inure to the benefit and be binding upon the legal representatives, heirs, devisees, successors, and assigns of the parties. THIS AGREEMENT is executed the year and date first above written. SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP FRED J. SIMON Fred S1 n �Fr� SIMON MOTORS, INC. Ruth Simon Terri Er 061 7;i�e Fred i n, J V J. S CAT. NO. NNOOOV TO 1946 CA 17 -611 �TME INSURANC4 (Partnership) AND TRUST STATF. OF CAIWFORNIA COUNTY OF riverside > SS. On March # , 1983 1 f x mr a un d a N hl' �� and for said State. personally appeared RDJ -S�u� , 5 • , L .I TE RI ERWOOD -- peminally known to me sir prove W me on the lio%is of satisfactory evidence to be the �t�nTnn who executed the within instrument as h of the partners of the partnership 0/►ttWKAL that executed the within instrument. and acknowledµed FAYE IL am to me that such partnership executed the same. WARY Puke-CAN" WITNESS my hand and official seal. �`� x MMY by Cssal. EW% Apr. 1t, 3 Signature a �� (This am for official twtwrial wall 4 � • �l L7' M C STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) f COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On March 1, 1983, before me, the undersigned, .a Notary eublic in and for said State, personally appeared FRED J. SIMON, SR., personally known to me br proved to me on the basis of satisfactory. evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. FAYYEE K IM r, aw n mm STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On March 1, 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said.State, personally appeared FRED J. SIMON. SR., personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satis- factory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the President of the Corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -4— W"" «x FAYE K KM pM ftc • cxlm w t ties `4 r r a M STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) O _ as. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On. *larch 11 , 1983, before me, the under- signed, a Notary Pu c in and ror said State, personally appeared FRED J. SIMON, SR., personally known to me or proved to me on the bA31S of satisfactory evidence, to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in Fact of FRFn J. SIMON, JR., M.D., known to me to be one of the General Partners of THE SIMON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, the partnership that executed the within instrument on behalf of said partnership, and acknowledged that he subscribed the name of FRED J. SIMON, JR., M.D. thereto as principal and ,his own name as Attorney in Fact. WITNESS my hand and offical seal. OFFICIAL SI'Ai, DIANNA CONNERI.1' !,`�•= NOTARY PUMC - CAVrv,•'.'!A My ervm. et; lrce AM O ll? EXHIBIT "A" TO a SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT Parcel 1 of Parcel Map Number.18418 as recorded in Parcel Map Book 3 , at pages yfl• Records of Riverside County, California. lob , C O N T I N E N T A L L A W Y E R S T I T L E C O M P A N Y A Vftlly Owned Subsidiary of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation 1605 Spruce Street, Riverside, California 92507 Telephone (714) 784 -2120 [1110%.Xv CCNI'INE NTAL LAWYERS TITLE 1605 Spruce Street Riverside, CA 92507 Attention: COLLEEN Your No.: 13689 -3 Our No.: 03- 129356 -02 Dated as of January 30, 1991 at 7:30 a.m. IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE IlZSURANCE, CONTINENTAL LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY, a California Corporation hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued as of the date hereof, a Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the Estate or Interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached cover sheet. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. THIS REPORT, ( AND ANY SUPPL 4ENTIS OR A[+ETZ14NIS HE=) IS ISSUE D SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT, IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR CCNMIT R4T SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of Policy of Title Insurance contemplated by this report is: 1. California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy - 1988 (X) 2. American Land Title Association Loan Policy (10- 21 -87) ( ) 3. American Land Title Association Residential Title Insurance Policy (6 -1 -87) ( ) 4. American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (10- 21 -87) ( ) Title Officer, KRIS SMITH ORDER NO.: 03- 129356 -02 �i :121 The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: � A FEE Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: THE 3S CaMPANY, a partnership, as to Parcel 1 PaCNA FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a United States Corporation, as to Parcel 2 The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of Califoarn.ia, County of Riverside, and is described as follows: Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 of Parcel Map 18418 as recorded in Parcel Map Hook 113 at Pages 49 and 50, Records of Riverside County, California. Parcel 6 of Parcel Map No. 18418 as recorded in Parcel Map Hood{ 113 at Pages 49 and 50, Records of Riverside County, California. Said land is located in the City of La Quinta. Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 6,• Ia• !• •'/ Its � ti •' CALIKEMA IN3JRANCE CODE SECTION 12413.1 WHICH WAS EI I=- BY CHAPTER 598 OF THE LAWS OF 1989 (A.B.512) EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990, REGULATES THE DISBURSEMENT OF ESCR M MMS BY TITLE OCMPANIES. Funds received by this Ccnpany via wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Funds received by this Company via cashier's check or teller's check may be disbursed on the next business day after the day of deposit. If escrow funds are disbursed to this Company other than by wire transfer or cashier's or teller's check, disbursement and /or closing may be delayed. Questions concerning deposit and disbursement of escrow and sub - escrow funds and recordings should be directed to your title or escrow officer. a «ter • • • •• I• DAN 491 4 Z r 1001 01-10.10 o • Z• I• I21 1. The charge for a policy of title insurance, when issued through this title order, will be based on the short -term rate. 2. This Company is requiring that the attached "Declaration" be completed by the owner of the Estate described or referred to in Schedule A, immediately prior to the close of this transaction and returned to us for our approval. The purpose of the Declaration is to provide this Company with certain information that cannot necessarily be ascertained by making a physical inspection of the lands. Please contact us in the event you require assistance in completing said Declaration 3. NOTE: Should this transaction involve our Company with a funding in excess of $1,000,000.00 or more, we will require said funds be wire transferred and that our pay -off department be contacted to make arrangements for same prior to closing. Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 i • N u • a• 1 a is .. _. 4. A Statement of Partnership Qn the below General Partnership was recorded as indicated and discloses the following General Partners: Name of Partnership: The 3 S Campany All General Partners are: Paul T. Selzer John Sanborn The Simon Family Partnerhips Recorded: March 17, 1983 as Instrument No. 50372 of Official Records. 5. The requirement that this Company be provided with a full copy of the unrecorded partnership agreement of the below named partnership, together with all supplements or amendments thereto, before issuing any policy of title insurance. Name of Partnership: The 3 S Company Attached, for.your convenience, is "Partnership Agreement Certification ", which is to be signed by the General Partners and submitted with the above agreement- 6. A Statement of Partnership on the below General Partnership was recorded as indicated and discloses the following General. Partners: Name of Partnership: The Simon. Family Partnership All General Partners are: Fred Simon Ruth Simon Terri Erwood Fred Simon Jr. Recorded: March 19, 1980 as Instrument No. 52831 of Official Records. 7. The requirement that this Canpany be provided with a full copy of the unrecorded partrnersh p agreement of.the below named partnership, together with all supplements or amendments thereto, before issuing any policy of title insurance. Name of Partnership: The Simon Family Partnership Attached, for your convenience, is " Partnership Agreement Certification ", which is to be signed by the General Partners and submitted with the above agreement. Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 8. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require evidence, satisfactory to the Canpany, that the vestee corporation named herein: (a) was duly incorporated on Pcmcza First Federal Savings and Loan, the date title was acquired by the said corporation; and (b) is now of good standing and authorized to do business in the state or country where the said corporation was formed. 9. This Ccnpany will require the following to insure a loan or a conveyance from, the entity named below: (a) A copy of the corporation By -Laws or Articles (b) An original or certified copy of the Resolution authorizing the subject transaction. 10. Any interest of the persons) ph own whose possible interest is disclosed by reason of their being shown as owner(s) of said lard on the county secured tax rolls. Name(s): Jamie _ •dson J J. Caron L. Ferro Donald Bauman 11. It is our understanding that based on doc uTients to cane when recorded, title will vest in: SIlMON PLAZA INC., a California corporation Please advise as to the correctness of the above: a) That we have the correct names and spelling; b) That we have the correct status; c) That there are no other or intervening (exchange) parties to this transaction who we have not considered. 12. This Company will require the following to insure a loan or a conveyance from, the entity named below: SIMON PLAZA INC.,. a California corporation (a) A copy of the corporation By -Laws or Articles (b) An original or certified copy of the Resolution authorizing the subject transaction. Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 AT THE DATE HEREOF EKCEPTIONS TO •• E• • h IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED Mme' •' V WOULD AND EXCUJSIONS IN THE POLICY FORM DESIGNATED ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS REPORT • • 1. Property taxes, including any personal and /or property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $303.21 PAID 2nd Installment: $303.21 UNPAID a..m. .. MV15 Code Area: 020 -009 Assessment No.: 617 - 020 -020 -8 Said matter affects: Parcel 2 2. _Property taxes, including any personal and /or general property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $498.86 PAID 2nd Installment: $498.86 UNPAID Exemption: NONE Code Area: 020 -009 Assessment No.: 617 - 020 -021 -9 Said matter affects: Parcel 3 3. Property. taxes, isrludi -ng any personal and /or general property taxes and arty assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $416.48 PAID 2nd Installment: $416.48 UNPAID Exemption:: NONE Code Area: 020 -009 Assessment No.: 617 - 020 -022 -0 Said matter affects: Parcel 4 4. Property taxes, including any personal and /or general property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $313.50 PAID 2nd Installment: $313.50 UNPAID ExaTption: NONE Code Area: 020 -009 Assessment No.: 617- 020 -023 -1 Said matter affects: Parcel 5 Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 5. Property taxes, including any persmal and /or general. Property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $4,170.20 PAID 2nd Installment: $4,170.20 UNPAID m7m.n.1ma Code Area: Assessment No.: 020 -009 617 -020 -024 -2 Said matter affects: Parcel 6. 6. Property taxes, including any personal and /or general property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 1st Installment: $962.28 PAID 2nd Installment: $962.28 UNPAID 3-TT"A INGTAMOM Code Area: Assessment No. 020 -009 617 - 020-025 -3 Said matter affects: Parcel 7 7. Supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to Part 0. 5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the California Revenue and Taxation Code as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occuring prior to date of policy. 8. There is existing on this property a supplemental assessment number (not yet available) for the fiscal year 1990 - 1991 pursuant to Senate Hill No. 813. NOM: There are no amounts available at this time from the County Tax Collector's Office and possibly wa11 not be any at the time you desire to close. 9. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of the State of California. 10. These taxes may be invalid. We will advise you of our findings, if there are any ci-arxges . 11. The effect of any vested or accrued water rights for mining or agricultural purposes, and reservation of right of way for ditches and canals constructed by authority of the United States, as contained an the Patent from the United States of America, recorded October 30, 1913 in Book 6 Page 244 of Patents, Riverside County Records. Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 12. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as reserved in a document Purpose: slopes purposes Recorded: April 5, 1968 as Instrument No. 31462 of Official Records Affects: Northeasterly 15 feet 13. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map shown below. Map of: Parcel Map 9618 Book 60 Page 18 Purpose: drainage purposes Affects: portion of Parcels 2 and 4 PM 113 Pages 49 -50 14, The fact that the ownership of said land does not irclude rights of access to or from the street or highway abutting said land, such rights having been relinquished by the map of said Tract. Affects: State Highway 111 and Washington Street 15. The fact that drainage easements have been offered for public use and public utility purposes by recital on said Map. Said offer was not accepted at the time of recordation of said Map rxor has it since been accepted. 16. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map shown below. Map of: Parcel No. 18418 Purpose: private driveway Affects: portion of herein described properties NO'T'E: The owners certificate of said Map states that "we hereby retain the private easements for private use for the sole benefit of ourselves, over successors, assignees, and Lot owners within this Parcel Map." 17. An easement for the purposes shown below and rights incidental thereto as shown or as offered for dedication on the recorded map shown below. Map of: Parcel Map 18418 Purpose: drainage Affects: a portion of herein described property Omer No.: 03- 129356 -02 18. Covenants, conditions and restrictions (deleting therefrom arty restrictions based on race, color or creed) as set forth in the docxment. Recorded: March 17, 1983 as Instrument No. 50364 of Official Records Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. Among other things, said docuunent provides for: Easements for walkway and driveway purposes 19. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $2,752,450.00 Dated: February 24, 1983 Trustor: Simon Family Partnership, a partnership as to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 18418 and The 3 -S Company, a partnership as to Parcels 2, 3, 4; 5 and 7 of Parcel Map No. 18418 Trustee: Pomona Financial Services, Inc. Beneficiary; Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan Association, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States Recorded: March 17, 1983 as Instrument No. 50374 of Official Records An agreement to modify the terms and provisions of said deed of trust as therein provided Executed by: Simon Family Partnership, a general p; The 3S Company, a California Partnership; Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan Association Recorded: April 14, 1988 as Instrument No. 98665 of Official 20. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions and provisions set forth therein Lessor: Fred J. Simon and the Simon Family Partnership Lessee: Simon Motors, Inc., a California corporation Disclosed by: Subordination Agreement Recorded: March 17, 1983 as Instrument No. 50375 of Official Records Order No.: 03- 129356 -02 - log I •• o. An agreement which states that this instrument was subordinated To: Deed of Trust Recorded: March 17; 1983 as Instrument No. 50374 of Official Records By agreement Recorded: March 17, 1983 as Instrument No. 50375 of Official Records Said matter affects: Parcel 1 21. Water rights, claims or title to water. 22. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection or by a survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. NOTE: An inspection of said land has been ordered; upon its completion we will advise you of our findings 23. This Company will require that a full coy of any unrecorded lease referred to herein be furnished to this Company, Nether will all supplements, assignments and amendments, before issuing any policy of title insurance. IP" IN e1�0.Vyii)0A0 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS: Guardian Bank, ABA NO. 122040427 800 South Figueroa . Leos Angeles, CA 90017 For: Continental Lawyers Title Account No. 002- 703920 Ref: 03- 129356 -02 mct typed: 12 -11 -90 Jsn updated: 2 -5 -91 plats enclosed /N THE C /TY OF L4 OU /NTA , OF :T/7L�►COUNTY OF ,P /YEP3 /OE, STATE OF C'o FO.PN /A P/ L.RVi._/L, / / .�P/ ! D. /.V�18 G.rAPN/C J[•�L! �'•Hn_A. i � 0 OFl",FC CZ /Y1AP /YO. 96/B, P.ER I'D" 60//6, ' 7FS/77FWrR6cORas OF R /YERS /OECvU/Y7CA 1.ep 1, /✓.E.:6 /9B2 ' \1 ,•Mr' /..11. 1t• �'L � � - !/i II' TT , ITN �1'_ STATE HWY• 'YO. iI �I •�- _ r• �1 . t .c. - -' , . .�A %' l� / '. it rr.. -r -. ~•'i"� - _ \ V ; (L. _ • o'• � ii YEYORS NOTES \� .J>;,•: _ - 'I'I i' ie - 'S OFBEAR /N S� r.�,Eef.�•eti..�v� -. '�`' •'t` ... ..- :: ,:•++ rl,... - )p-wdvrwEwEJr111.1le l'/Wf/Y- YI .. -•�` tt „� .. .•ti,' ,..,� : - 'JYOVV 70 /J BASCO Gi'v nvl CAt /FOR/Yi.9 .. \ •, �r ,, f • LOT xs SYSTEM L-ONf 6 i,PS�AI A/✓ CO. aar/.n - - , 7KP /L{f •%YfA�J /LIFM.J /O B'nAOW SFr J7)R ✓ZV LS ,iCNTfJ 41. / P Jfr it USN, rFCCEO 1. J. / —,r ♦ f -� 1 r . I /.' ♦: ,. -avn, l I._r . 7 /CFrfJ FOUNT Md„uM!/YTJ AS VOTED '1 / ' • r• ORESTE \ OR /VE 7,fiD7EJ ?ESTRMTEJ i7CCrS-f ,o,P AL1E0/C,4TE0 A,%47 A. .11 •JO.v1000 f 'EJ TAGGED L.J. /il JfrAr =r CO.o/VE.PS NNe ---Cr OrEO L�7NE.VW /,fE. \• ,.I ' .\ rK lii• � � Jl::; fir. -L L �� 'KENT NOTES I 07 WI-11.01 OAI C,.NA/ S /N jAituo Oi TI,•FYMlfO JT/�rEJ ♦1 \ rr' nr� �, i �� _EO Oft JO, /!/7 //Y BN 6, it:'. I�t LVPArEiYrJ P!C QFF1',!CO. ♦ • ♦• ♦� ,frf,� - _ i.•:. _ ♦ 1 -= n.sENT AGFfEMFNT FDA• J /G/1' rt/A�/'OtIJ Of17✓!EN M'Alhv/✓07DN r, LTD. iv/YO FAfO J /MOi,' f ✓i0E/„C!O BY JOCtrMfivr,�lt'OA10lO ""''' �'•'r .. - ' /_Ilii L 'i„r ,,/.975 AS //YJr P J/7A0 OF O. .I ' iP. iw•i ' - ... ••• TrfR :f A,GNTJ OF /rCFfSt (ECe",f JV"fRtYH JraTE „�•✓Y. /// ' / ` \ - - _ - "' ` _ - /NGTON JTRflr ,.AE Ael leegVIS -,CO BY i .� tRii��nt�.2.. ��•�'TU" \,11r"�t'�t'/1W' fP''i!•' �ift�� t�• i��f'l'�,i+i t` � �.l..tn �1N,, f },t�� ., +�• � ✓R•Cfb A'.1®R, Loo Angeles 03929 Received iCay Y {,,,1913 U 8. Lead Offie* 1 Loe Angelee,Ca1; 4 -1003 �� i Y . 1, ,, I , t C1 +r, �L P '. I 71 1 '11 IS >d. J•. /�L. THE UNITED STATES OP P , TO ALr, TO WHOM THi3E PRESENTS SHALL CGMS, OSEST130 s 12118 AS, a'certlticat• of the Reglater of the Land Office at Los Angeles, California :ban been dep00ited.in tbs. General Land Office, ehor *by .it,appoarn th at. Jpursuent..to. the Act of Congress,of May 20, 1862. "To secure homeeteade to actual,aettlere on the Public Domain ", and the sets supplemental thereto, the claim of Anna Scott Lunbeok, widow of Borman Lunbeok ban been established and duly consummetcd, in conformity to law, for the northeast quarter of section thirty in township five south of range coven east of.tbs San Bernardino Perldian '?x Callfornla, containing one hundred sixty acres, according to the Official Plat c*f the survey of the sold land, returned to the General Land Office •oy the Survey or- 0eneral: {!•' HOW X110V YE , That there in, therefore, granted by the United. States unto the said Claimant the tract of land above dea,cribedi TO HAVE AITD TO HOLD the said tract of lard with the appurtenances thereof, unto the said claimant and to the heirs and aseigns of . the-said claimant forever; aubjoot to any Tested and accrued water :rights for mining,',;' agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to ditchee and reservoire tieed in connection with such water rights, as may be recognised and acknowledged by the local cuetoma, laws, and decisions of courts: and tbere 1s reserved from the lands hereby granted, a right of way thereon for ditches or canals conatru :tad by the authority of the United States, IH TESTIYOL'Y WHERMy, I Woodrow Wilson, Prooldent of the United Lltates of America, have caused these lettere to be made patent, and the seal of the general Lard Office to be bereunto•uffixed. Given under my hand, at the City of Washington, the fourteenth day, of May in the year of our Lord one thousand niro hundred and thirteen and of the Independence of the United States, the one hundred and tbirty- seventh, By the President: Woodrow Wilson. (CE:11MAL LArD OFFICE SEAL) By V. P. LeRoy, secretary. R. I. Sanford, Recorder of the Recorded: Patent number 333677. General Land Office. JUL 21993 C9`V OF �A nN 1. ='132 _ Received for record Oct. 7C, 1913, at 25 min—past 3 0101 o�Yai4.,� Anna.Sa0ttLuw,beolc. Copied In Book Ho. 6. of Patents ` 0 ,pag e.244, records of Riverside County, " California IJ LTese X1.00. 9 Logaa,�,Recorder. 4{,, Y,1,r JY r b .. c � , ., , • r J � of >,,i �'� 3;"�, :_ iAS it J �. ��` �''�, '•d .J.v lsr'ju, Y ii+_v,q'i { tx Y Jy � t_ � r' 1 t 7 F, t I I ;' ;i�rr�S'17 iilf �r :1 ��v Fti n♦ lA� � v 1:_ r ' } � 1 t'1'. rl : '� �� 'i rY, , .• - %di ° - �I. •1 -� r�F1,4V. vh, i! .�.��ft.,, t - JF`� , - h,' u`'�N {�'• *' fi trD , fgF'R <t �y� i.t' h� r. .i 4 r•i -t y ,t• hf. ';ri1'f?i ;� 1 '� �°c � I ♦ `FOi 15,�.�pp � 'r�. I ��l �r�``; � � `' �i I, t �- t r ! y[, °r`4�1 J ,t rl {,4 Y,�,��4{F .1 E, a� i r + 1 w t♦ �b S,�y� .. +.� .. <_! \.fG't�t�+hi �,(r. ? .. .. - ... .. . -, .,. - l�i.'S J.. _. r. Af�Yl. �1.:: f� "�'_`,�.54y��:y��. :'!.'_"\`... •.[•.�r"a!'! .�1'. :=�i.�: .Yi.�. 5:�9n'i.i. . ... � r ,. } 4( �' �,� k� „t';,� 3 .�, i tot Received Msy�.'24.,19 :L a Angeles 03929 -,-Land''Of flie ;Log:, ;Axgoles,Caa 4-1003 THE UNITED STATES OF 'AMIC TO ALT, TO WHOM THFSE PRESENTS SW -..COMB.- GusTlIG j IMICENA.S, a certificate of the Register of the Land Office at LosoAngolso'. Califorcia,Aas beau depoaited.in the General Land Office, vtoreby It appears %bat pursuent'to. tho.Act of Congress of Way 20. 186E, "To)eocure homesteads to actual.settlerm an the Public Domain", and the acts supplemental thereto, tLe claim of Anna Scott Lunback, widow of Borman Lunbook has been established and duly consumutel, in conformity to law, for the northeast quarter of section thirty In township five south of range coven east of.tbe Son BerrArdino Meridian California. containirg one hundred, sixty acres, accoitirg to the Official Plat of the survey of the said land, returned to the General Lama Office 'oy the Surveyor - General: DOW XIICIV YE , That there Is, therefore, granted by the United States unto the said claimant the tract.of land above described. TO EVE AND TO HOLD the said tract of lard with the appurtenances thereof, unto the said claimant and to the hair" and assigns of the said claitrant forever: subject to any vested and accrued water :rights for mining. agricultural, manufacturl?ig, or other purposes, and rights to ditchtie and reservoirs geed in connection with such water rights, be may be recognised and acknowledged by the local customs, laws, and decisions of courts; and tbsie Is reserved from the lands hereby granted, a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOP, I Woodrow Wilson Proaldent of the United litotes of America, have caused those letters to be mud* patent, and the $*&I of the general Lard Office to be hereunto affixed. Given under my band, at the City of Washington, the fourteenth day of May In the year of our Lord one thousand zilre hundred and thirteen and of the independence of the United. States. the one hundred and tbirty-seventh. By the President: Woodrow Wilson, (GENERAL LAND OFFICE SEAL) by Y. P. LeRoy, secretary. 11. W. Sanford, Recorder of the Recorded: Patent number 333677. General I" Office. Received for record Oct. BC; 1913, at 25 min.'....past 3.ololool: P. M. at request of ur Inns 0 0 t t Lwlb**W Copied In Book No. 6 of Pf%tints i',page 244,,rocords of ItIvers'140 county, Pees 41 00 rz xfa, 1 3 'Logan `:,,,Recorder. R)i ot, 01, u %mwigommp Ilan MMW ORIGINAL rx ,TTE) BY o- .3 hwoys" It iip Son L)i*W(J 12 Culifornia 11 4111 -G- 1XWOORMBATT7) AMA MIMI (041%11 11 Mgfv GRANT DEED III Itiv 11 L33.1 compor'.0.4 or he V. xMi-iLiz d Fl"►AJT lie $5.50 1101 It" —f GRANTS V .101AW fn to the STATE OP CALIFORNIA, all that real property in tlw •Amlly State of California, dewrilwl sit L Z I 6 t 'w -V 1 That portion of the Northeast gttarcer of Sect.ion :b, T. 5 S. R. 7 E.i S.A.M., according to United Staten Government Survey proved 1111 15 1876, as described in deed to One Pleven Washington Limited -ecorded July li, 1966 as Instrument No. 70464, lying Northeasterly of the f:il(ming described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of the Soutl. amt. quarter of the North• east inter of said Section 30, distant along said F• t line N.0'17'23 "W., 312,78 feet from a found 6 -inch by 6 -inch Concrete Mor anent set for the East quarter corner of Section ;30; thence (1) frcxs a teng7 _ which bears N.70'24'54"W., along a curve to the right, with a radl)s of 2555.00 feet, through an anggle of 29'16'45" a distance of 1305.65 foot to a tangent line; thence (2) 1,.41'08'09"W., 177b.68 feet; thence (3) along a tamest curve to the left, with a radius of 2320.00 feet, t:hrrnt en angle of 8 56'27 ", a distance of 362.03 feet to the North line of the i4ortin+est q%iarter of iald Northeast quarter of Section 30, distant along aa;ld No-.•th line ".89'3: 12 "E., 169.14 feet from a found Nail and Tin net for flit' North quarter cone: of Raid Section 30, Containing 18,993 square feet. To other with the underlying fez interest, if any, oppurtenant to the above 4VscrNw.d property In and to the adjoining public Mays. PARCEL 2 An easement for alope ones in and to that porticin of the Northeast quarter of Section 30, 7. 8., A. ' E. S.D.H., According to United States Covernmirnt Survey approved July 15 185& as described in deed to One Eleven Washington Limited recorded July li, 1961 as Inst ::usent'No. 70464, lying Ycrtheastarly of the following described line: Beginning at a point an the East line of the f3outheast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 30, distant alo��g said East line N.0'll'23 "W., 296.84 feet from a found 6 -inch by 6 -inch Concrete Monument set; for the S aitheast corner of said Southeast yuarteir of the Northeast quarter; thence (1) from 4 tangent which bears !1.70.32'09 "tl, alongg a curve to the right. with a radius of 2570.00 feet, through an angle of 19'24'00" a distance of 1318,14 feet to a tangent line; thence (2) N.41'03'09"W. 17f4.68 feet; thence (3) along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1305.00 feet, through as angle of 9'22'52 ",' a distance of 3f7.40 feet to. the North line of the Northwest quarter of said Northeast quarter of Section 30, distant along.said North line N.89'32'12 "E., 145.88 feet from a found Nail ,end Tin set for the North quarter corner of said Section 30. Excepting therefrom, Parcel l hereinabove des :ribed.: Containing 51,844 square feet. Reserving unto grantors of the above - described Parce'1 2, their successors or assigns the right at any time to remove such slopes +or portions thereof upon resov1ng the necessity for maintainlag such slopes 1)r portions thereof or upon providing in lace thereof other adequate laterel support, the design and construction of which shall be first approved by the- State Division of Highways, for the protection and support of said highwa ±r. The bearings and distances used in the above descriptions are on the California Coordinate Systems Zone 6. Multiply all dist noes used in the above descriptions by 1.0000174 to obtain ground level d� stances. ll -Riv -1 0 -33.1 It /W 15526 -1,2 3/2/67 II,. ,,,.•...r i•nrl.rr it, Irrtr�n,l. th.t tl.. I t rl • .•n ,..ntrtr.l in Ire �, I rl.�� , ..... 1. ,- brm� ll. .. .. �. �. ! I . rl � ,.. .,., �,� ,.., ,..I .!I .1 „n,rr• I•. ;rnU,n'. fern,,,...��, L,..,, 4444 r•r:m.n, t., .1 I. .,,, I..' , ..I il,. I,.. rr,..n• � ,... r:..� r. ,,, 1...•1,. .t•,nr •�r ,n +intro u., r �.1 .,. I + , i. ., .. l +rrnl 1!,, j;f I r, d,r +.1 ^H: t'r t• h+r 14 i•• , '•u,nr,l ,.{I . +•I.trred in rl.r prr.rttrr r,( .,, •. .. r I�. 7Z&-Z SUBSCRIBING WITNESS ^ i I Starr !u At 10 r1ONIA r� (ry NIT OI 1 1 San Franrinco rte ; (,ItA Nt'(1It(S) � n f n Urcernber .20, 167.. SVAIT. (11' < ?II 11 )K NIA In ., t. l.r. w,., Ih. ,,,re.rlyrt.A. 4 Nn..rr ►. hlk Its «wl Ior $4W Ci tt. ty atnl '.tlratr tv' $ ;In E'r.lnt iar.�+ C «rr, .f tr4.., rt4rw.t4llr .f"004 Fremont...D. to ` p. �V w (1n Januar 5th I68 Irb,rrmr. iltchcock Jr. and ES if rile un.lertr;Ined a Notary Public in and for else Starr 1 a at of Cil,fornit, r •idinK therrin. duly rnrnm,aioned an.I l t r .. .wont, Iterwrnal {� tpitearr.l 1 l • E'renlnnl (I . Ilitchcock, Jr. rM p.rin.rl 0 IM grrrwehlp . 1[ ,hot rw,.r.4 dv .14” k,rrr,..o.el Ond trin.nrb.lp.d to ny 7 s rMl .,wn po —'ehtp y.vur.d d.4 44rrt4, ` WIIWSS Mr Mod 4nd dlkl4l 6044. g d I It known to nit to III, the Ivrton whole name (11 in t„bu ril r.l yr the within imuuntrnt and a, ionwlr•II r,l NIM (Ii11AAY0iJkMslytyllleLM4.�Ir. that lie executed the lime. COM. 1111'. NOy. It I911 -PAl1 IRANCISCO Co. Lu ►ow Prow, Per HMChols, Cr11. 91104 1C'ITNF.SS my hand in,l offilciiaalr�wa�l. ISr,I l IU/tAJ,41}Q f 1� L'W ' 61itA'!. (SCA) y V r11t.DtGAUU L. HAIUUS not,r) 1 _. ...W11. IXP. flay. It IPJI.lAM /o: w I•.t a .:. N.n,r r7 t1'rd nr Pr in r.'ll N.m. l It P"I,.CM f`1%U Srtw. San Irpm lw n, t►lie •111„,1 N.r..r r.lb. I. ..j I., r.a vv. � - N•.l..t hhBr 4..i 1,,. u.: tl.Ir (CFRTII'IC:ATF. OF ACCEPTANCE. GOVERNMENT COIIE, SECTION I7191) 'hem It T-I C-111'r, That Ilse State uI Califnrnia, granter herrin, acting by and Ihtnnrh the tkparunent of I'uldrr W-kt. Ilirrti.,n tat Ilrghwayt. t.rreby arcrrll for public purla,tra else real Im.perty, or interrtt tberrrn, tonrryrd by the wilhm ,Ir,•d and rr•n.ent. In the rrror,larinn theme,(. 1.1 11'11111 tt Will aror, I lure hetrunto wt my hand thin 5 L dar of Fubru.ary 19 tJf3 J V..U,;L .D. 11UJUN o rC of I'ul fic Wmkt istrict ltigl G u 4 l Aj-,unt lliv.. of liighwaya ` Atinrnry in (art END RECORDED n_ri 1MFt-1T «/ M A I •b IJ d. 9.182.0 A lications. Resident and commercial plot plan applications shall be submitte, to the planning and development department and provide the following in- formation and exhibits: A. Complete application form; B. One copy of the preliminary title report or deed of O trust to the subject property; ------------ Sets of the site development plans (number as re- quired by the planning and development department), each set to incorporate the following: 1. Dimensioned floor plan(s) relating to all build- ing layout aspects, showing applicable sales /display, office area, bedrooms, kitchens, hallways, bath /restrooms, etc., for the particular use under review, O 2. Four -point elevations of any and all buildings proposed on the site, delineating any outstanding architec- tural feature(s), relationships to any existing structures and /or other adjacent properties, and listing proposed building materials, finishes, colors, etc., O 3. A detailed site plan delineating all siting aspects of the development (i.e., setbacks, topography, fencing locaitons, locations provided for ground- mounted mechanical and heating /air conditioning systems, parking, accessways, adjacent streets, utilities, drainage, and any proposed signage. O Note: In some instances, a preliminary grading plan may be required if it is determined to be necessary due to topographic considerations and other related site factors. O4. A complete site landscaping plan, showing a listing of quantities, species, location and plant sizes to be incorporated into the final landscaping of the project. .The final approved landscape plan must be stamped "approved" by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office O prior to the issuance of a building permit. D. Two sets of all plans reduced to eight and one -half inches by eleven inches, and submitted on acetate or other O similar format suitable for presentation. E. One eight -inch by thirteen -inch color, material and finish sample board for the building's exterior areas, in- cluding, but not limited to, roof covering, facia boards, tile inlays, stucco finish, wood or other plant -on mater- ials, etc. Colors and materials shall be keyed on at least O one set of architectural elevations. F. One colored elevation of all sides of the build- ings, oriented to public view, in accordance with the mater- ials sample board submitted. A colored swatch (band of color on the drawings) may be substituted for a complete O colored drawing. G. If the application requires a public hearing: A list of the names and addresses of all owners of real property located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property to be considered, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any update issued by the City Assessor. The list must be certified by a title company, architect, engineer, or surveyor. C' 1� PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET CASE(S-): Plot Plan 91 -466 APPLICANT: Simon Plaza, Inc. Mr. Philip M. Pead, Pres. PO Box 461 78 -611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 .Phone: 773 -2345 ARCHITECT /ENGINEER: Merlin J. Barth, Architect 714 - 991 -7191 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to develop a mixed use commercial center which will include offices, a resturant and /or a bank, a medical clinic, and a bowling center (approximately 185,964 square feet) on 5.6 acres in a CPS Commercial Zone District. The property is at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111. ACRES (UNITS /AC.): 5.6 acres GENERAL PLAN /LAND USE: Commercial EXISTING ZONING: CPS Commercial ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: The site is west of the existing Simon Motors automotive dealership and north of the proposed Washington Square project proposed by Birtcher. The site is vacant. Attachments 1. Large Plans 2. Assessor's Map 3. Topographic Exhibit 4. Applicant Form R 5 ` 1 S7s�.t •� � i1 's 416 IN V i � •. 7.I.f1 i I /1• oe tiF� s r I : MoT-° � P v I q Po�2 492?Ac.Gr. 4808Ar, At I I t 0 49.34 Ac_` crac 3 ,�. k, .4 0 Q J j i eJ k ac �,✓. I AE. NI. V i � •. 7.I.f1 i I /1• oe tiF� s r I : MoT-° � P v I q Po�2 492?Ac.Gr. 4808Ar, At I I t 0 49.34 Ac_` o ` 1 a I W:V:� 0 Trailer Tra Well •'A\, Park'''.. \ � '•.? ..... VENUE �. L \., ,...:;: , ~:•'o MMES \� \ �0: Cta O oq OY; �. ` :U • O q.. �.r'. s o 8 72 BM 61 [21 ' arl ° 0 VI Trailer Park \^ 1 = • - - - _ _ - _ - ; Trailer :Park -- 1/ �..A�£NUE I by Z) .. 1. k O" c I cc ENUE J I' 32 U1 0 �y \' ° 6p Q.� , , Sal b Well 50 74 �a AVENUE,",_ �Z Well dr ✓ice -/ o - 2 r a W ° O \�1 ' oWe �� Op ;� o I• ;., far., -= __:_ = -- . y.:. • ..'. • 1. . 1, _ ,O •_ ! (a. •. . ate •. �. LA Oujp;I'A, ALIF.:.::: •.::'-;� t : HE /4 PALM DESERT 15• IADRANbLE I N3337.5— W1161�5/7.5 i 1959 PHOTOREVISED 1980 i + •' a _. 38 a DMA 2751 111 NE— SERIES V895- Ct e n - i �^s ,�. CITY OF LA QUINT` "j�9r�` AIC 1 !DING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL ?, 101 PH.: 619/773 -2345 78-105 CALLE ESTADO A QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 CITY OF LA �)UINTA FAX: 619/568 -4567 ; �� to : � & D �t I — (a(� Case e N No.: 4 Date Received: -7-3 -RI COMMERCIAL FEE -' bLAN APPLICATION gA at_ zl l HIGHWAY ONE- ELEVEN at WASHINGTON P.O. BOX 461 as your application in a timely manner, please 78 -611 HWY. 111, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 form. The information which is required to and submitted with the application is stated cm. Failure to provide the required information ejection of the application. r PHILIP M. PEAD, PRESIDENT 11 BE ACCOMPANIED BY A NON-REFUNDABLE' FILING FEE OF $ ✓ AND .J- COPIES OF THE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE PLOT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. - - Name of Applicant Simon Plaza, Inc. Phone 619 - 773 -23 5 Mailing Address P.O. Box 461, 78 -611 Highway 111, La Ouinta 92253 Street City Zip Code Legal Owner 3S Partnership & Pomona First Federal AddressP•O.Box 1461, 78 -611 Highway 111, La Ouinta, CA 92253 Proposed Use Commercial The net and gross square footage for each proposed use and building. The square footage allocated for sidewalks /walkways, _ 450 sq.ft. Location of Property (Address if known) Assessor's Parcel Number Parcel Map 18418 in Book 113, Pages 49 & 50 Parcels 2,3,4 5,1 Legal Description of Property (give exact legal description as recorded in the office of the County Recorder) -- (may be attached) Signature of Applicant Signature of Date 7 1 9 r Date -7 i BUILDING HEIGHT SUMMARY Washington Street October 24, 1991 PROJECT NAME (Case No. /Case Action) 1.' Palm Royale - TR18915 - Approved by the County of Riverside in 1983. Two story buildings were allowed, however, only t_J_-4& units are within 150 feet of Washington Street. 2. Deane Homes - TR23971 - No buildings greater than one story are permitted on Washington Street (cond. 30). 3. AG Spanos - SP 88012/TR23995 - One story building are required within 150 feet of Washington Street (cond. 32 /TTM). 4. TDC /Transpacific - SP89 -014 - Per CPS Zoning standards with plot plan review and approval (cond. #35). Staff currently is processing Plot Plan (98 (Auto Club) which is for a new one story building at the corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street. No other buildings along Washington Street have been reviewed. 5. Washington Square - SP87 -011 - Per CPS Zoning standards with plot plan review and approval (cond. #5). No development plans have been submitted. 6. Lake La Quinta - TR24230/TR26152 - 75% of the building shall be one story (20 1 ) on Adams and one story ( 20' ) on 48th Avenue (cond. 24) for the residential units. Commercial development is subject to a conditional use permit (cond. 42). Building heights will be determined by the Planning Commission. No development applications have been submitted. 7. Laguna De La Paz - TR 20052 - One story buildingwere constructed for this tract. 8. The Pyramids - SP84 -004 - One story buildings are required within 75 feet of the perimeter property line (cond. 29). 9. Parc La Quinta - TR 21555 - One story buildings were required along Washington Street. The single family homes are built. Note: see the attached map for project locations r � N6; pis �r l� '.1.0 1 1.11 J ; f. . BUILDING HEIGHT SUMMARY Washington Street October 24, 1991 PROJECT NAME (Case No. /Case Action) 1. Palm Royale - TR18915 - Approved by the County of Riverside in 1983. Two story buildings were allowed, however, only t5„� units are within 150 feet of Washington Street. 2. Deane Homes - 43971 - No buildings greater than one story are permitted on Washington Street (cond. 30). Alot� a�,tCGt.�lt2/l 4 2 or'Sf�iE-SFort.� �-w�s aJo�q c�kts�t 5'f'• c�/tA'2C� � 3. AG Spanos - SP 82/T23995 - One story building are required within 150 feet of Washington Street (cond. 32 /TTM). 1`190 4. TDC /Transpacific - S9 -014 - Per CPS Zoning standards with plot plan review and approval (cond. #35). Staff currently is processing Plot Plan — (P8 (Auto Club) which is for a new one story building at the corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street. No other buildings along Washington Street have been reviewed. 5. Washington Square - SP 7 -011 - Per CPS Zoning standards with plot plan review and approval (cond. #5). No development plans have been submitted. 6. Lake La Quinta - TRf24230/T]Sr�6152 - 75% of the building shall be one story (20') on Adams and one story (20') on 48th Avenue (cond. 24) for the residential units. Commercial development is subject to a conditional use permit (cond. 42). Building heights will be determined by the Planning Commission. No development applications have been submitted. 7. Laguna De La Paz - TR 20052 - One story building—were constructed for this tract. 8. The Pyramids - SPj84 -004 - One story buildings are required within 75 feet o the perimeter property line (cond. 29). 9. Parc La Quinta - TR 21555 - One story buildings were required along Washington Street. The single family homes are built. Note: see the attached map for project locations -ro A� > ? Lam , � fy1'0 s PdO (a,4 .�h`� -1 S ' i� -Q.�t r1-f-� �S� � ��- 7 A ALES AVENUE - 24 �— SWE FIOfiMY 111 ;L •L �1 r� CASE MAP m NORTH CASE Na Washington Street Building Height Directory Map SCALE: 0 4J a, a 13 vii DAROY ROAD Q .+) C t0 Farr) wnnw. Iil UVI ALES AVENUE - 24 �— SWE FIOfiMY 111 ;L •L �1 r� CASE MAP m NORTH CASE Na Washington Street Building Height Directory Map SCALE: 0 1 sJ ci.t ,t�oo•t� S4s i7� Q NV 5 �s 6 �.r !r n6 h Z h 3 'il- a .r P� TD �,0 v Por. 2 /3 49&Ac.Or. 4868Ac. AY 1 �NS7 z J G, rx c /7 49.54 Ac? • /". @2,.� 0..7%4cM. HM 7 _ 4' 'r Nt 1� n6 h Z h 3 'il- a .r P� TD �,0 v Por. 2 /3 49&Ac.Or. 4868Ac. AY 1 �NS7 z J G, rx c /7 49.54 Ac? • �. 0 I T Park ��. Well ... I S.. . _ � l �u � � l ) � \( ` ' � : o i ..� �sv �1~�=I. T ' ti :' ," h � b ; • ..o - VEL' U `E . � � � I C�ep; Q ; . 11� • 11 i} I i i ' t • M , n " A O �O YTM Ln ,I � EI��. � IJ S 80 P A - ' l . 1 I G o c 72 678 k lTr ai ler Park Tr ailer :Park e 1 " I EI N NO UQ \ U E n rm We ° . E < v u II i 33'; !31 3S rI� ' 3I n , EP 50 Well 7< A VfNUt O Well tu i h LA QUINTA, <0 ILL NE /4 PALM: DESERT .15'LADRANCLE N3337.5— W1161/7.5 N 21 o iIIi ; ' 1959 PHOTOREVISED 1980 , =_ •` ' a 38 ii DMA 2751 111 NE— SERIES V895" jt II ---- (,P W a n �� n It 0 1T r FT a�eL �,,. I eowuwc cr�rte�c T I I r � I r O � ~S y\ T ,�J.•Mf�.+ j EXHIBIT CASE NoqLzq " SEP 26 199 CITY OF LA DEPARTMENT -5170-- Q9.fl.s6M ©ca i III Q ! . 6s9 � mat; Rv� a T q .� � rtt t'° �'. ,!:j v .i .. .. K:: :Y.r.� h. ... ` t �.� :;�� ... ` e. .. F' i., •�u. .�a.,.r i.: z�. -�. t: .... . -.� - t i .. - ... .... .. r,c',Ja c• , Yom.; -1 �'�•i_.F•? i.? ...,' t.... i.�. .. .ir Y�RA p 6J S EP 2 V 1991 Pll�hl ;! 9£PIIJ7�TCA" _ iii - _- - = -= __ • -_ _ ®� - _.:iii• - — !e ?; _��_ .' :e - - .; .. .....:. ice; _1 -3 nni :uw; ■w soon mall EXR11317 CASE N(Ol� C i s w U C 5 � 4.� T.�� ..3 ' _ '. • � Yrwwf ' s t Nfut�• a�rfY.w �a�.0 [s e•Mwuf b"u "a ""rum I 'SfL'f IOPi A -A EXHIBIT CASE NO. I SEP 2 6 9991 PLANNIM0 O ABTMENT ;� .:�F�, �:� ...... ... i ,`. s .. r. .:. _ .. ... �r -' t t 11' r ru -a • VIE COPY 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 December 17, 1991 Mr. Philip M. Pead Simon Plaza, Inc. PO Box 461 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 & VARIANCE 91 -019 Dear Mr. Pead: As you will recall, the Planning Commission discussed your project at their meeting of December 10, 1991, however, they continued your case in order to allow your development team time to evaluate the following issues prior to your January 14, 1992 meeting. They were: 1. Can the Applicant meet the one story height provision of the City's General Plan on Washington Street? 2. Examine the front yard setbacks on both primary street frontages and their relationship to the project and to abutting properties (e.g. approved projects, existing projects, etc.). 3. Review the on -site parking needs of the project and determine if shared parking arrangements can be allowed. 4. Is the off -site storm water plan, as proposed by the developer, adequate? 5. Is this project too intense for the site? 6. Are the aesthetics of the project adequate for this primary corner of the City? 7. Is the parking structure necessary and if so, can the .project designer reevaluate its bulkiness and location on the property? Can the height of the structure be reduced? 8. Can the architect examine further ways to create "view corridors" through the project which enhance the character of the development? MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 LTRGT.058 /CS -1- EM 'r If you have any design revisions for your project that you would like to make before your next meeting, please submit the material by January 6, 1992. . We would appreciate 18 copies of your plan and the prints should be folded to 8 1/2 x 11- inches. The deadline is January 6th because this Department requires adequate time to finalize your revised Planning Commission Report. Failure to meet this deadline could delay the processing of your project for two weeks. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PLANNING,& DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR e4- Trousdell Associate Planner GT:ccs cc: Mr. Merlin J. Barth; Architect Mr. John Sanborn; Sanborn & Webb LTRGT.058 /CS -2- -r- ► '� R T-itit 4 4a Q" 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 December 12, 1991 Simon Plaza, Inc. c/o Mr . Philip Pead P. O. Box 461 78 -611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 & VARIANCE 91 -019 Dear Mr. Pead : On December 10, 1991, the Planning Commission continued your project to their next meeting of January 14, 1991. Should you have any questions concerning this action, please contact this office. Very truly yours, JERRY MAN J E NNI & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROUSDELL Associate Planner GT : bja cc: Mr. John Sanborn, Sanborn & Webb Mr. Merlin J. Barth, Architect LTRGT.025 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 ,.- (rjt�t 4 s(f-vQ" 00 0 COP7 1 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 November 15, 1991 Mr. Philip Pead, President Simon Plaza, Inc. PO Box 461 78 -611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 & VARIANCE 91 -019 Dear Mr. Pead: The City Council will discuss your project on November 19, 1991. The meeting will begin at 3:00 p.m. and the meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers located at 78 -105 Calle Estado in La Quinta. A copy of the study session report and agenda are attached. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY H PLANNIN //& DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Greg Trousdell Associate Planner GT:ccs Attachment cc: Mr. John Sanborn; Sanborn & Webb, Inc. 3S Partnership; Pomona 1st Federal Mr. Merlin Barth; Architect MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 LTRGT.046 /1tS -4: f� 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRAW ATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 11, P.O. BOX 85406, SAN DIEGO, 9218 6-5408 (619) 688 -6968 November 14, 1 City of La Quinta Planning and Development Department P. O. Box 1504 La. Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Mr. Greg Trousdell PETE WILSON, Govemor -RIV -111 PM 33.1/34.2 Simon Plaza We have reviewed the traffic impact study report for the proposed Simon Plaza development located in the southeast comer of the State Route 111 (SR -111) and Washington Street intersection in the City of La Quinta and have the following comments: On March 14, 1991, a Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR/PR) for improvements on SR -111 between Washington Street and Adams Street was approved by the District. The proposed improvements were designed to accommodate Year 2010 traffic generated by proposed commercial developments north of SR -111, but did not include traffic generated from the proposed Simon Plaza development. A conceptual plan for upgrading the existing four lane highway to a six lane conventional highway through this area was included in that report. ,The traffic impact study report contains several significant differences in the Year 2010 peak hour turning volumes at the SR- 111/Washington Street intersection when compared to those shown in the PSR/PR. Of particular concern is the eastbound SR -111 to southbound Washington Street right turn volume; the eastbound SR -111 through volume, and the northbound Washington Street to westbound SR -111 left turn volume. These volumes, as shown in the traffic impact study need to be resolved since they are approximately twice as high as those in the PSR/PR. The traffic growth rate factors used by the consultant may need to be adjusted at this location. The traffic study includes an intersection schematic for SR -111 at Washington Street (Figure 7) showing eight lanes on SR -111. This is not consistent with the Route Concept Report (RCR) for SR -111 and is probably unnecessary because the traffic volumes assumed in the study may be unable to reach the intersection due to upstream controls. The City may, however, elect to reserve additional right of way to allow for additional channelization on SR- 111 in the vicinity of Washington Street. The developer should be required to mitigate traffic impacts on SR -111 associated with the proposed development. Driveway access location from SR -111 to the proposed development should be prohibited, if possible, or limited to a single opening for right turning traffic only and should be located midway between adjacent intersections. _� � � 1 •- � J City of La Quinta November 14, 1991 Page 2 For future coordination regarding Caltrans standards or right of way requirements, please contact Bob Lowrie at (619) 688 -3211. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please contact Jim Buksa of our staff at (619) 688 -6968. JESUS M. GARCIA District Director I BILL DILLON, Chief Planning Studies Branch cc: C RWest AKosup JBuksa T/P File - _ ,.�,, i `r �. t J To • MI AL MEMO Pate: /a -8-1/ - -- CITY ENGINEER - -- CITY MAOZa F IRE MARSHAL D16 - -- MtOlITY SAFETY - -- 81,)iJ.DjK.DjYISIQN �- RIVERSIDE GO' ":,�Y From & DEVEL ;" fiRE DI"PARTN,T'gT Subject: PROJECT REVEW Case gL� e PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE ANY COMMENTS YOU MAY HAVE ON THE ATTACHED ITEM BY /o- COMMENTS: TfaL iBay LET rum C19-SAIF 'F,T 7Vtt X77/ -! i, • r GuL G .[F- eg 410 4-G 7;2�r /�Gt Z/' J-c� - -- V-L �U i /✓ eW �✓o k (c0 //l. —7 —,. . rd-.m ,ire . 9 46 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - -(619) 564 -2246- FAX (619) 564 -5617 October 24, 1991 Mr. Skip Berg DGI Signs P. O. Box 13530 El Cajon, CA 92022 SUBJECT: SIMON 'PLAZA (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AT WASHINGTON STREET) - PLOT PLAN 91 -466 Dear Mr. Berg: Thank you for submitting your draft sign program last month. We are planning to put your sign program on the Design Review Board agenda of November 6, 1991 at 5:30 P.M., provided I receive the following information: 1. Color samples (plexi -glass chips) . 2. Ten copies of the sign graphics (folded to 8-1/211 X 1411) . 3. One colored sketch of the sign program (e. g. , marker ink or colored pencil) . Please send the information to my attention by October 30th to insure inclusion on the November 6, 1991, Design Review Board meeting: Should you have any questions -- concerning : the ' above, _ please contact_ the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY H�r�.MAN P NNI & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR GR OUSDELL - Associate Planner - GT:bja LTRGT.006 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 T4ht 4 4aaamrw 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 October 23, 1991 Mr. Bill Dillon Chief of System Planning Branch Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 11 PO Box 85406 San Diego, CA 92186 -5406 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466; SIMON PLAZA Dear Mr. Dillon: Pursuant to your letter of September 11, 1991, please find attached a copy of the draft traffic study for the proposed commercial development at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111 in La Quinta. We would appreciate your review of the document at your earliest possible convenience because the project is scheduled for a public hearing on November 26, 1991. If you have any technical comments on the study, please contact Mr. Steve Speer; Assistant City Engineer, at 619 - 564 -2246 or contact Dr. N. Murthy, Transportation Planner at MGA. Very truly yours, JERRY HER14AN PL7ANNING DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR i V, l r Greg Trousdell Associate Planner GT:ccs cc: Philip Pead, President of Simon Plaza John Sanborn, Sanborn & Webb Steve Speer, Assistant City Manager Jerry Herman, Planning & Development Director MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 LTRGT.035 CS -1- 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO —_ LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 October 8, 1991 Mr. Philip M. Pead, President Simon Plaza, Inc. P. O. Box 461 78 -611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 AND VARIANCE 91 -017 Dear Mr. Pead: FAX (619) 564 -5617 This letter is to notify you that we will be unable to place your development case(s) on the Planning Commission meeting of October 22nd, since we have not received your proposed traffic study and hydrology study which meet the needs of our Engineering Department. If the reports were received today, there would not be sufficient time for City Staff to review both documents and generate recommendations to the Planning Commission. In addition, Caltrans would not have sufficient time to review your traffic study. The District 11 staff in San Diego has requested that we allow them adequate time to review and /or comment on your traffic study prior to action by our Commission. Therefore, it is necessary that we notifying you that your cases will be continued to November 26th. This date, however, is subject to receiving comments from Caltrans independent of our Staff review. It might be beneficial to have your traffic consultant, met with, or call Mr. Bill Dillon, Chief System Planning Branch of Caltrans as soon as possible. His phone number is 619 - 688 -6968. Please keep Greg Trousdell, Associate Planner appraised of your progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, dE R HERMAN L ANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JH : bja cc: Steve Speer, Assistant City Engineer Greg Trousdell, Associate Planner LTRGT.001 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 f '0/01/91 17:07 V619 594 3489 SIMON MOTORS 3 October 1, 1991 Mr. Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager City of La Quinta City Hall 78 -105 Calla Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ron, Attached is a memorandum from. Phil Pead to me relative to an agenda for the City of La Quinta Design Review Board meeting which is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, 10%2/91, I agree wholeheartedly with the conclusions that Phil has reached- We have expended a lot of time, effort and money to accozmodate the City on this project. -"-.am bringing the matter to your attention .because I feel you are unaware of what has transpired. The manner in which this information has been correlated leads me to believe- strongly that the Planning Commission is attempting to delay this project without a significant purpose and is bring iin areas of concern that do not need to be discussed or transmitted at this point, let alone transmitting it to the Design Review Board. Areas that we discussed have been worked 0-a diligently and I believe that the transmittal'of. the Staff Report is destructive and underminiisg .the-_ =good :efforts on Thoth our parts. I believe only those areas relative to the Design Review Board should be discussed at the meeting., The property owners are trying to resolve the problems and are very concerned about these events. Messrs Paul Selzer, ;Tohn- 'Sandborii.;,_:Gii Smith, legal counsel foT Pomona First Federal. and I plan to atterLd . the ineet? ng and to vigorously object to the attack being made on this project. The ulterior motives behind this report are undeterminable at this time and I bring it to your attention because I feel you have been up =front with us. Very truly yours, SI1?0 PLA INC. ed J. Simoa, Sr. hairma1 of the Board P.O: BOX 461, 78-611 HVff. 111, LA QUINTA, CA 9253 • PH-: &19r773 -2345 + FAX: 6191568-4567 2002 ,� � � . �, !r `. ,� � � . !r t,� I 1..0/U1/91 17:08 $619 Fa4 3489 SIMON MOTORS TO: Fred J. Simon, Sr. FROM: Philip M. Pead. SUBJ: Design Review Board Staff Report - Simon Plaza Application DATE: October 1, 1991 We received a copy of the Design Review Board Staff Report regarding our application tc the City of La Quinta. I had assumed that the report was written. by Mr. Jerry Herman, since he was the person we have dealt with on a daily basis making adjustments to our plan for Simon Plaza to accomodate his requirements.and those of other City.officials. I was shocked and dismayed to find out that my assumption was erroneous. When I called Jerry Herman to discuss the report, he. stated that he-had not written the report and indicated that he was not fully aware of its contents. He indicated that the report has been prepared by Greg Tro-asdell. I take several exception$ to the contents of the report and indicated as much to Mr. Trousdell when I spoke with him on September 30th. The report is couched in such a negative fashion as to leave everyozze Toth the impression that, in spite of our stated flexibility in working vvith the City, that the City Staff is not in favor of this develonme.nt. Z003 The paragraph "Storm. Water Retention '' states that the hydrology report is forthr-oming from the developer and that Staff would prefer not to act until the report had been received and reviewed. However, in. spite of this statement; Mr. Trousdell states that the report will show that we'are -una"ble to meet the 100 year sto= requirements on -site, therefore drastically changing the plan. Whon I inquired as to hoTga he could make such a statement and arrive at that conclusion without reviewing the hydrology report, he stated that he was editorializing. This is eiactly the attitude and tone that permeates the entire report. The editorializing continues in point six of the Staff comments when it states that a one story building height of 22' shall be maintai -zed along Washington Street within. 150.' of the -ultimate property line. This statement is not city policy. City policy states that no budding greater tnan one story in height shall be constructed within 150' of the property line_ It does not make specific reference to a height restriction. Again, when I challenged this statement, Mr. Trousdell agreed with me and stated that the height would be reviewed.by the Planning Commission- PO. BOX 467, 78-611 HWY. 771, LA C UINTA, CA 92253 • PH.: 6991773 -2345 • FAX: 6191568 -4567 pr r 10/01/91 17:08 $619 564 3489 SIMON_MOTORS Memorandum. to Fred J. Sion, Sr. From Philip M.'Pead Page 2 2004 Further in the letter relating to the View Corridor, reference is made to city policy concerning a'one- story building built within 150' of the "future" street property line. This statement is also incorrect. The city policy mares references only to a street property line and not a "future" street property line. This reference of a "future" street property line, which is made throughout the report, is an attempt, in my opinion, by Greg Trousdell to indicate an agreed dedication of a right -of --way on Washin.gtaa Street.by the developers. Specifically, the issue of dedication was addressed by Mr. Paul. Selzer's letter which was attached and which.states that the owners of the land have not agreed to the dedication in any shape or form.. Since we received the copy of the staff .report, -Mr. Trousdell has received the preliminary hydrology report,. The recommendation made in the report for a continuance for. the review of the plot plan ahould be ignored. -The hydrology report has been completed in reference to the Simon Plaza site. As was indicated by. Mr. Ron Kiedrowski, a larger view shot:id be taken of the matter since the e currnt method of handling - au water is a "bandaid" and the problem is not isolated to the Simo-a Plaza site. Th.e hydrology report shows that the Simon Plaza is only 1.72% of the water problems on this corner. Frankly., _I fail to see what hydrology has to do with the Design Review'Board. Considerable time and expep.se have been incurred in attempting to make this project acceptable to th'e city, so .-that Staff could make a positive recommendation for its development. It was my opzniozz that, after having met on several_ occasions with the Staff of the City of La Quinta, this. had been achieved; It would appear, however, that, in spite of our sincere efforts, this report addressed to the Design Review Board, with its editorializing and incorrect statements as to city policy, is aimed at dissuading both the Design Review Board and Planning Cu=ission from accepting the project -without making severe changes which would prevent any development of the property., In my view, the report to the Design Review Board should have addressed only those items that specifically relate to design and not to address issues of a technical nat -are. I believe the report to be improper and may have.been written with ulterior motives which . I am Lmable. to confirm at this time. It appears that this report lacks the effort.and willingness required of both sLdes, the city and the-developer, to bring this project to fruition. Fred, I believe we should transmit this information to Mr. Ron. Kiedrowskz whc has,.in my estimation, been working with us on a straight fo37t and basis. CC: Mr. Paul Selzer, Esq. Pomona First Federal Mr. John Sandborn Ph lip M. Pea A C STATE OF CALFORNIA - BUSINESS, TRAIv.- JRTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY It DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 11, P.O. BOX 85406, SAN DIEGO, 921W5406 (619) 688 -6968 >EP 13 PETE WILSON, Goverrx September 11, 199%1-0'8TV U� LA quINTA 'I.�iVf�I�G & DEVEMPum nut 1 -RIv -111 Washington Street PP 91 -466 City of La Quinta Planning and Development Department P. O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Mr. Greg Trousdell We have reviewed Plot Plan 91 -466 for Simon Plaza located at the corner of Washington Street and State Route 111 (SR -111). We have the following comments: A traffic study should be prepared for this development which identifies impacts and appropriate mitigation. On March 14, 1991, a Project Study Report/Project Report (PSR /PR), for improvements to SR -111 (PM 33.1 - 34.2) was approved by Caltrans District 11. The proposed improvements were designed to accommodate traffic generated by proposed commercial development north of SR -111 between Adams and Washington Street, as well as the anticipated growth to the year 2010. A conceptual plan for upgrading the existing highway to a six lane conventional highway through this area was also included in this report. Any improvements necessary to SR -111 due to the proposed development must meet Caltrans standards and also be in conformance with the PSR /PR referenced above. Access to this development from SR -111 should be restricted to one driveway located midway between Washington Street and Simon, with right turn in and right turn out only. A bus turnout should be considered, to conform with the bus turnouts being proposed on the north side of SR -111. Additional right of way may be required. We have specified a 30 foot setback to the right of way line from the ultimate edge of the travelled way for the commercial development on the north side of SR -111. Any proposed access or work within Caltrans right of way will require an encroachment permit. Information regarding encroachment permits may be obtained by contacting our Permit Office at (619) 688 -6843. Early coordination with our agency is strongly recommended for all encroachment permit applications. For future coordination regarding Caltrans standards or right of way requirements, please contact Project Engineer Paul Hardin at (619) 688 -6712. aw �I ._4 i City of La Quinta September 11, 1991 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning our comments please contact Jim Buksa of our staff, at (619) 688 -6968. cc: CRWest JBuksa T/P File JESUS M. GARCIA District Director By BILL DILLON, Chief System Planning Branch September 5, 1991 SEP 09 loci John J. Pena, Mayor CID 0b` LM yulff)A City of La Quinta 'TANNING & DEVELOWNT DEPT. P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor Pena: As you are no doubt aware, Simon Plaza, Inc. has a design review application pending before the City to allow construction of a restaurant /banking facility, a three story medical office building, a two story recreational facility, as well as an attendant parking structure to service each of the foregoing buildings. This parcel, currently in escrow, is owned by 3S Partnership which consists of Fred Simon, John Sanborn and myself, and Pomona First Federal. In general, the proposed development has been well received by the City staff, as well as many other residents and officials of the City with whom we have shared it. The staff has requested additional information which is currently being assembled and will be forwarded to them promptly. In addition, Simon Plaza and City staff are having ongoing discussions dealing with the City policy, contained in the General Plan, which provides that the City should pursue low density (low level) structures along major arterials. We understand that the City policy is to require one story structures within 150 feet of the property line. It is further our understanding that under appropriate circumstances the City Council may modify that policy if such modification, on balance, serves the interests of the City. I am writing this letter to you because of the long history of discussions and correspondence you, Mr. Simon, Pomona and I have had with respect to the property and the Washington Street Corridor Plan of the City. The purpose of this letter is to review that history and to point out why we believe a modification PTS15482 BEST, BEST & KRIEGER A PARTNERSHIP INCWDINO PROFE39*0NAL CORPORATION! LAWYERS 600 EAST TAHOUITZ CANYON WAY ARTHUR L. LITTLEWORTH' GLEN E. STEPHENS• DOUGLAS S. PHILLIPS' ANTONIA GRAPHOS WILLIAM D. DAHLING, JR. TERESA J. PRISTOJKOVIC KENNETH R. WEISS J. CRAIG JOHNSON POST OFFICE BOX 2710 WILLIAM R. O.WOLFE' GREGORY K. WILKINSON VICTORIA N. KING SUSAN C. NAUSS PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92263 BARTON C. GAUT' WYNNE S. FURTH MATT H. MORRIS CHRISTOPHER DODSON TELEPHONE 325 PAUL T. SELZER• DAVID L. BARON JEFFREY V. DUNN MARK R. HOWE (619) -7264 DALLAS HOLMES' VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS STEVEN C. DOBAUN BERNIE L. WILLIAMSON TELECOPIER (619) 325 -0365 CHRISTOPHER L. CARPENTER' EUGENE TANAKA BRANT H. DVEIRIN ELAINE E. HILL RICHARD T. ANDERSON' BASIL T. CHAPMAN ERIC L. GARNER WILLIAM J. ADAMS JOHN D. WAHLIN• TIMOTHY M. CONNOR DENNIS M. COTA WANDA S. MCNEIL MICHAEL D. HARRIS' VICTOR L. WOLF JULIE HAYWARD BIGGS KEVIN K. RANDOLPH W. CURT EALY' DANIEL E. OLIVIER RACHELLE J. NICOLLE EUGENIA J. MOREZZI THOMAS S. SLOVAK* DANIEL J. McHUGH ROBERT W. HARGREAVES JAMES B. GILPIN OF COUNSEL JOHN E. BROWN* HOWARD B. GOLDS JANICE L. WEIS JAMES M. KEARNEY JAMES B. CORISON MICHAEL T. RIDDELL* STEPHEN P. DEITSCH CHRISTIAN E. HEARN MARSHALL S. RUDOLPH RICHARD A. OSHINS* MEREDITH A. JURY* MARC E. EMPEY SHARYL WALKER KIM A. BYRENS RONALD T. VERA MICHAEL GRANT* JOHN R. ROTTSCHAEFER PATRICK W. PEARCE CYNTHIA M. GERMANO FRANCIS J. BAUM• MARTIN A. MUELLER KIRK W. SMITH MARY E. GILSTRAP 'ADMITTED IN NEW YORE NEVADA, ANNE T. THOMAS* J. MICHAEL SUMMEROUR KLYSTA J. POWELL GINEVRA C. MARUM WASHINDTON, D.C. COURT OF CLAIMS D. MARTIN NETHERY' JEFFERY J. CRANDALL JASON D. DABAREINER DANIEL C. PARKER, JR. GEORGE M. REYES SCOTT C. SMITH HAYDN WINSTON NGUYEN D. PHAN WILLIAM W. FLOYD, JR. JACK 8. CLARKE DAVID A. PRENTICE PAUL G. GIBSON MICHAEL A. CRISTE• JEANNETTE A. PETERSON KYLE A. SNOW CRAIG S. PYNES GREGORY L. HARDKE BRIAN M. LEWIS MARK A. EASTER CHARLES E. KOLLER OFFICES IN KENDALL H. Mac VEY CLARK H. ALSOP BRADLEY E. NEUFELD GEOFFREY K. WILLIS DIANE L. FINLEY MICHELLE OUELLETTE RAYMOND BEST (1868 -1957) RIVERSIDE (714)686 -1450 DAVID J. ERWIN• KANDY LEE ALLEN PETER M. BARMACK JAMES H. KRIEGER (1913 -1975) RANCHO MIRAGE (619)568 -2611 MICHAEL J. ANDELSON' ELISE K. TRAYNUM DAVID P. PHIPPEN EUGENE BEST (1893 -1981) ONTARIO (714) 989 -8584 •A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION September 5, 1991 SEP 09 loci John J. Pena, Mayor CID 0b` LM yulff)A City of La Quinta 'TANNING & DEVELOWNT DEPT. P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Mayor Pena: As you are no doubt aware, Simon Plaza, Inc. has a design review application pending before the City to allow construction of a restaurant /banking facility, a three story medical office building, a two story recreational facility, as well as an attendant parking structure to service each of the foregoing buildings. This parcel, currently in escrow, is owned by 3S Partnership which consists of Fred Simon, John Sanborn and myself, and Pomona First Federal. In general, the proposed development has been well received by the City staff, as well as many other residents and officials of the City with whom we have shared it. The staff has requested additional information which is currently being assembled and will be forwarded to them promptly. In addition, Simon Plaza and City staff are having ongoing discussions dealing with the City policy, contained in the General Plan, which provides that the City should pursue low density (low level) structures along major arterials. We understand that the City policy is to require one story structures within 150 feet of the property line. It is further our understanding that under appropriate circumstances the City Council may modify that policy if such modification, on balance, serves the interests of the City. I am writing this letter to you because of the long history of discussions and correspondence you, Mr. Simon, Pomona and I have had with respect to the property and the Washington Street Corridor Plan of the City. The purpose of this letter is to review that history and to point out why we believe a modification PTS15482 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEG`.. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 2 of the City policy with respect to building height, in this case, serves the interest of both the City and the developer. As you will recall, this property was subdivided pursuant to the terms of Parcel Map 18418 in 1982, shortly after the incorporation of the City. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that Map, the 3S Company, and Pomona, the owner of Parcel 6 of that Parcel map were required by the City to make certain dedications of rights of way along Washington Street and Highway 111 and to improve those rights of way with paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and traffic light modifications. In addition, of course, we were required to install water and sewer improvements to serve not only our property, but also other properties in the area. Those improvements were later installed at substantial expense to us. In early 1986, we became aware that the city was considering an amendment to its General Plan which would adopt as • part thereof the Washington Street Corridor Plan which would have • significant impact upon our properties. As the attached correspondence will attest, we violently objected, and informed the city that we believed that they city could not exact additional rights of way and improvements from us, and that if it adopted and implemented the proposed plan, it could not count on our project to voluntarily, or as a condition of development, dedicate or improve the rights of way which would have been required to implement the plan. We had several meetings with the staff at that time, and went to considerable time and expense in preparing and presenting plans which were alternatives to those set forth in the Washington Street Corridor plan. We were assured that nothing would happen without further discussions with us. Unfortunately, in 1987, and without notice to us, the City adopted a plan which resulted in a proposed widening of Washington. When we became aware of the change, we immediately contacted you and the City Manager, and again reiterated our position that we did not intend to dedicate or improve any addition right of way along either Washington Street or Highway 111; that we had an absolute vested right to develop our property in a fashion consistent with our approved Parcel Map and the zoning applicable to the property at the time we began development, and that if the City really intended to implement its plan for Washington, it should plan on condemning the property, because we would not dedicate it. We also pointed out that with the Washington Street Plan in place, and the set backs required along both Washington Street and Highway 111, the parcel owned by Pomona, and our parcel situated adjacent to Washington Street had become virtually undevelopable, and would result in a claim by us and Pomona that the remainder of those parcels not taken for street expansion had PTS15482 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEGE. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 3 been rendered virtually useless resulting in a claim by us and Pomona that the remainder had been taken by inverse condemnation. Thereafter, we had several meetings with both you and the City Manager. At a meeting held on October 1, 1990 with Mr. Kiedrowski, the City Manager, we informed him that we had several potential buyers for the property, but that we were unable to proceed with any one of them until the issue of the Washington Street right of way and set backs had been resolved. He told us that it was unlikely that the matter could be resolved without specific development plans being submitted to the City, and he encouraged us to prepare a plan which would accommodate the needs of both the city and the owner of the property. He specifically told us that he thought that the matter could be resolved to the satisfaction of both the city and us if each of us was mindful of the concerns of the other. He acknowledged that the right of way issue was of concern to the city, and suggested that if we were willing to compromise with respect to the dedication, the city might very well be willing to compromise with development standards which might otherwise be applicable to the property. He urged us to keep in touch with the City as our plans progressed. Based upon our discussions with both Mr. Kiedrowski and you, we have worked assiduously to plan a development for the corner which will serve the interests of both the City and ourselves. That plan is embodied in the documents which we have submitted to the City for review and approval, and includes the dedication by us of Washington Street to its planned width as desired by the City. It should be noted that in order for us to accomplish the plan, we have agreed to purchase the Pomona parcel so that we can offer the dedication and develop the property as an integrated project. In return, we are requesting that the city policy regarding height in this area be modified. We believe that our proposed development will be a significant asset to the city and will result in a project on this most important intersection at the entrance to the cove in which the city may well be proud. We think that this is truly a win -win solution to our mutual problem. The City gets its right of way, and both we and the city get a quality development with which we may both be very pleased and satisfied. In the event the city is unwilling to modify its policy regarding height in this area, we will have no alternative other than to return to development of our portion of the property within the parcels as set forth in our approved map, and consistent with the applicable zoning ordinance and policies in effect at the time. In such event, we will not be in a position to purchase the Pomona parcel or to dedicate the Washington Street frontage. Pomona will PTS15482 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST & KRIEGE,. John J. Pena, Mayor September 5, 1991 Page 4 undoubtedly develop its parcel independent of us. Furthermore. we are of the legal opinion that the City may not, in such event, require the dedication as a condition of the development. We believe that this alternative is a lose -lose proposal. The city does not get its right of way, and both the city and we get a development which will not match what we are currently proposing in terms of quality. We hope that we are not left in this position. As always, we remain ready, willing and able to meet with you, the City Council, the Planning Commission and staff at any time to discuss the matter further. If additional information is desired, please give me a call, and we will respond immediately. We are most anxious to have this matter resolved at the earliest possible time. Since 1986, we have entered into agreements to sell the property to three separate buyers. Each one of them has walked away from the transaction because of the uncertainty surrounding the dedication and set back issues. We hope that we can finally put this matter behind us. Thank you for your consideration of this most important matter. Yours very truly, Paul T. PTS /ssk Enclosures cc: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager ✓Jerry Herman, City Planner Gilbert F. Smith, Pomona First Federal Philip M. Pead, Simon Plaza, Inc. Fred Simon, 3S Partnership John Sanborn, 3S Partnership PTS15482 I I " a PONTIAC T =RU CK9 July 22, 1986 Mr. John J. Pena, ?Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear John: V I would like to acknowledge your correspondence of July 18, 1986, in reference to the road design of Highway 111/ Washington Street Intersection. We are in the process of the final negotiations of selling the property to a developer and it would certainly be beneficial to get some commercial property established on that corner as soon as possible. I am sure that with the.interest you have expressed in your letter, once we have a Developer's Plan suitable for submission, we can move ahead for final consideration. I will continue in my efforts and hope we can get develop - .went started with the City's assistance.- Sincerely, SIMON MOTORS, INC. red J. Simon President FJS:mec CC: City Council Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager Larry Stevens, Community Development Director Robert Weddle, City Engineer John Sanborn, Sanborn/Webb Paul Selzer, Best, Best & Krieger Bob Nichols, Pomona First Federal "The Home of Persona! Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway 1 11, La Quinta, Califomia 92253 (619) 346 -2345 WR .1 pl"�5 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 July 18, 1986 Fred J. Simon, President Simon Motors, Inc. P. 0. Box 1461 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Fred: Pursuant to your request, the Community Development Department has reviewed both of your proposed revisions to the road design at the Highway 111 /Washington Street intersection. The City appreciates your efforts in preparing alternative designs for the area which take into consideration both your concerns about additional right -of -way and community concerns relating to traffic safety. With regards to the designs proposed by Sanborn /Webb, they represent acceptable design possibilities for the Washington Street corridor near the Highway 111 intersection. Each generally provides for adequate capacity and uses accepted traffic design standards. Each would also be considered as consistent with the adopted Washington Street Specific Plan. You should be aware that it was not the purpose of the Washington Street Specific Plan to select a precise road design and no such design has been determined at this time. The Specific Plan was intended to provide general design and right -of -way criteria for the corridor and any number of design alternatives, including those prepared by Sanborn /Webb, will be considered in the upcoming phases of plan implementation. While it is premature to select a particular design at this time, please be assured that it is certainly the City's intent to minimize potential right -of -way acquisition to give due consideration to existing improvements, to carefully evaluate impacts on affected property owners and to minimize road improvement costs in the ultimate improvement of this important road corridor. The City is currently preparing a precise alignment study and a financing feasibility study and, following that, experts to prepare improvement plans in its efforts to improve the Washington Street corridor to at least a four -lane condition as soon as possible. In the event that your desire to secure approvals for and develop the Washington Street frontage parcels would occur prior to the completion of these studies, the City will attempt to resolve the MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Fred Simon, President Simon Motors, Inc. July 18, 1986 Page 2. precise design issues as part of any development application that would be submitted for the affected parcels. It is expected that the general comments on the Sanborn /Webb revisions would provide adequate guidance to prepare site development designs suitable for submittal. In preparing those plans, you should feel free to work with Larry Stevens, Community Development Director, and Bob Weddle, City Engineer, in order to minimize the impact of changes that typically occur through the development review process. It is hoped that this response gives you adequate assurance that we can work in concert in resolving mutual concerns along this very important corridor. I believe that we can achieve our common goals best by continuing to work together. Your interest in resolving any differences and continuing to progress towards mutually acceptable solutions is appreciated. Sincerely, ohn J. en Mayor JJP:LLS:dmv cc: City Council Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager Larry Stevens, Community Development Director Robert Weddle, City Engineer John Sanborn, Sanborn /Webb Paul Selzer Bob Nichols Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan Association Since 1892 July 3, 1986 Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, Calif. 92253 Re: Widening of Washington Avenue Dear Mayor Pena: Pomona First Federal has received a copy of the plans submitted on behalf of Simon Motors, Inc. in regard to the proposed Washington Avenue widening. Although this would still have a detrimental affect on our property, it is much more acceptable than the previous action taken by the City. It appears that the Groves traffic study, includ- ing projections for traffic through the year 2035, is more realistic than other reports received by the City. The Plan submitted by Mr. Simons substantially re- duces the cost to the city and permits property usage which would result in additional taxes for the city. It also renders our property as being immediately usable rather than unuseable as will result under your present plan and would result in a lower acquisition costs. Our Board of Directors has not had a meeting to discuss the amended plan submitted by Mr. Simon, but I feel confident that it will meet with much more approval by the Board than the present plan. Thanking you in advance for consideration of the pro- posed plan by the La Quinta City Council, I remain Very truly yours, WILLIAM G. BERGMAN, JR. Vice Chairman of the Boa d of Directors of Pomona Firs Federal Savings and Loan Association WGB,JR:ps Administrative Offices: 350 South Garey Avenue • P.O. Box 1520 • Pomona. Calilornia 91769 • (714) 623 -2323 • (213) 625 -7666 • (818) 964 -7800 • (714) 972 -0521 June 26, 1936 Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA. 92253 nPAr John N FPONTIAC TRUCKS USA . Enclosed is a work -up that Mr. John Sanborn has completed after visiting with Judith Cox and Larry Allen of the City Council, and Larry Stevens of your Planning Department. The plan submitted to you on June 13, 1986, revised the original plan developed by B.S.I. and your Planning Department, which severely cut the property on the corner of Washington and Highway 111. After submitting our revision and attending the projected traffic study by the Groves, Mr. Sanborn and Mr. Selzer visited with the three individuals mentioned ab'pve, and from their.discussions, Mr. Sanborn made several additional revisions which show adaquet lanes to accept the traffic patterns as outlined in his correspondence dated June 24, 1986, a copy of which is attached along with revision number 2 by the property owners. I think this plan makes alot of islands are sufficiently wide at six the traffic patterns adaquetly. The property is needed to accomodate the our first revision and therefore les be necessary in acquiring this land. sense because the median feet, and would seperate, end results are that less traffic patterns than on s cost to the City would Evert with this revision, Pomona 1st Federal would lose 4050 square feet and 3S loses 6400 square feet, in comparison to the original plan submitted and approved by the City Council which would be well over an acre or close to 50,000 square feet. I hope you will all take this into consideration and allow us to discuss this matter with you if there are any additional questions. Sincerely, S IMON MOTORS, INC. Fred J. Simon President \t "The Home of Personal Service" cc • Nichols P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway 1 1 1 , La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 3�3 Rrn e zer Stevens TRUCK June 13, 1986 Mr. John Pena, Mayor CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA. 92253 Dear Sir: This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of June 12, 1986, relative to the changes adopted on the corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street, that have taken such a large protion of the land from the East side of the corner, that it renders the parcels owned by Pomona 1st Federal, unbuildable. It also severely disects the parcel owned by 3S on the corner of Simon Drive and Washington Street, which again would make it questionable as to whether or not it would be useable as a commercial site. I have submitted a revised plan to you that has been worked up by Sanborn Webb, Inc., which we think works. It also limits the loss of property to the two owners and would reduce substantially, the cost of acquiring the parcels, by the City of La Quinta, in order to do the plan that was originally adopted. We have included a study done by the Groves that was submitted to the City and was accepted by you as a traffic study for Washington Street. It varies quite drastically from the one B. S.. I. is now submitting for the Washington Street corridor. The groves projection, projects considerably less traffic than the B. S. I., and we, for the sake of common sense, can not see Washington Street carrying more traffic than Highway 111 in future years, and that in essence, is what their study and your planner have done with the configurations on the current plan. Our recommendations have many advantageous points that should be taken into consideration. 1) Adequately covers the traffic project for Washington Street. 2) Allows for stacking on the corner. 3) Eliminates severe loss of property by owners of corner. 4) Reduces cost to City tremendously. 5) Logically allows solutions to problem, so we can proceed with developing the corner immediately. , 6) With the corner developed, we can begin to bring revenue into the City, rather than taking revenue out of the City's coffers. 7) Continues to solve the problem for the people at "Point Happy ". "The Home of Personal Service" P. O. Box 1461, 78-611 Highway 1 1 1 , La Quinta, California 92253 (619) 346 -2345 A Mr. John Pena June 13, 1986 Page 2 All in all, this alternative plan resolves the problem at "Point Happy ". It resolves the problem of traffic stacking. It resolves the problem logically for all concerned and limits the need for acquiring entirely the two parcels affected. I hope you can personally participate and I am asking Mr. Bob Nichols of Pomona 1st Federal, Paul Selzer and John Sanborn of 3S, to personally participate with your Planning Department and your City Council to correct this.problem as quickly as possible so that we may proceed to develope the land and bring revenue into the City!! FJS:mer cc: Bob Nichols Paul Selzer John Sanborn Larry Stevens Sincerely, SIMON MOTORS, Freda J Presid 1� -"Q 0 FA• ,howl Rio!"' At bps,." K C. �J VKH-EL A. lII•CE I-ADfir Ar C, zz,.: I'-' L. GC-: w. V T T E- A. F-FTEz;5014 L. F.,; C, !,1 •0 TER A "O'C55MIAL CGRPOPM10N April 25, 1986 City Council City of La Quinta La Q,-linta, CA 92253 LAW OFFICES OF FRE BEEyr, BEST & KRIEC3f7F COO EMS TAHOWZ-MICALLUt-i %MY P. U. F-Ox 2710 PALM SPRING5,CALIVORNIA 9226,; TELEPHONE(619;32S• 261 TLLEX 752735 Dear Nayor and blembers of the Council- RWER"Dc C`FFQE RANCHS p,pACE CKOCE HOPE SMnAE P-C"EY: ." 30730 Lot FQ�E C:'A .50TT 2.c R C. mx Jn WN"O ES 0410M WSE.0 COOT bWa- 2e:) #IIZ.IAITTLO This office represents the 3S Company and Simon Family Partncrship who are the owners ol Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and Parcel hap Nnm;:;nf 18415 respectively, and this letter is w.Litten in connection %oitl-., your proposed Washington Soreet Corridor Amendment to the Ceneral Plan, We have been informed thy o both the City Council and the Planning Co=ission have held Public Hearings in connection with the Gelleral Plan Mendment and that tho City Council has adopted that Amandnenl� to ynur. Cenaral Flan. Unfortunately, neither the 3S Company ror the Man Family Partnership received notice of any Public hes7in&7: whoLsoaver. Neolless to say, my clients object vehemently to the proposal on many grounds, incluNng but not linited to the following: Vo L.,ere not given proper notice of the Hearings beforc the Planning Commission nnd City Council; and, The need for additional right-of-way on the east-. si&- , of Washington Suicet and the south sidn of Highwvy M has not been dYMOnStr2ned; and, The burden of the propos& falls entirely upon the owners east of Washington Street while the benefi,,: falls solely to the owners of property west of SLi:ect; nnJ, -property values listed in the study are signific=10 holoy rhoso satforth in effers to purchase previozs?:- rccuivcd by my clianns; and, City Council April 25', 1986 Page T�-.o 5. The existcnce of the General Plan Amendment so significantly clouds the ti ,-.le to the properties o;:ned by my clients as to male it unmarketable. In view of the foregoing w.: would respectfully request that the City reopen the Hearings on this matter after properly giving notice to each owner ent-.itled thereto in order that we may have ample opportunity to present evidence and alternatives to those plans reco- =,ended by the Planning Commission and apparently adopted by the City Council in its Specific Plan Number 86 -007. While we wish to cooperate with the City in its !-..ndeavors to imipr_ove the area, I aril sure you -.'ill understGnd our_ concern when we fo-11.nd out after the fact that after having already dedicated 36 feet along Washington Street, five feet along High-.ay 111 and installing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and traffic signals all at significant- expense arl all within the last three years, the City no,.7 wish s to tear out all of that work and render valueless at least two of the parcels : -ith Parcel Mlap Nu:aber 18418 all without notice to us. I1z view Of the drastic economic effects this is having on our clients at the present time we would respectfully request an early response to this letter. Phan': you for your prompt consideration of this matter. 1ov.rs very truly, LEST, BEST & KRIEGER Y l. T. e er PT Sts cc John Sanborn Fred Sir;-,on bcc: Gilbert Smith, Pomona First Federal MEMBER AGENCIES Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio La Quinta Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Riverside County Mr. Greg Trousdell Associate Planner CITY OF LA QUINTA 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Plot Plan 91 -466 Dear Mr. Trousdell: August 21, 1991 AUG 7 ocrl L� 'lAP1NIPlG & QEUEItI'PIPI4T OEP� Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for the commercial development to be located on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Highway 111. As you may know, SunLine operates Line 19 on thirty- minute headways (fifteen- minute headways during peak hours) along Highway 111, and Line 4 on sixty- minute headways along Washington Street in the vicinity of this project. Beginning in the fall, SunLine will operate Line 4 in the La Quinta area on thirty- minute frequencies during peak hours. We request that bus turnouts and passenger waiting shelters be included in the project. These amenities should be located on Washington Street and on Highway 111. SunLine has suggested standards for bus turnouts and passenger waiting shelters. As an alternative, we would like to see a transfer center on Simon Drive. In this vicinity, SunLine currently has a large volume of passengers utilizing Lines 19 and 4. A project of this size can only increase the number of ridership, therefore, a transfer center would be most advantageous. We request an opportunity to meet with the city and the developer to discuss our needs. We will contact you the week of August 26th to schedule an appointment date that will be convenient for all parties. I apologize for the delay in my response but please be assured we are very interested in this development. Yours very truly, &..4' &'� Debra Astin Director of Planning DA/ kh 32 -505 Harry Oliver Trail -Thousand Palms, CA 92276 .(619) 343 -3456 • FAX (619) 343 -3845 A Public Agency August 14, 1991 Mr. Jerry Herman Planning & Development Director City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Plot Plan 91 -466 Dear Jerry,,, r 1 IJ j 'I.ANNING & DE'1ROPKU DEPT I appreciated the time you took to meet with Fred Simon and myself regarding the proposed development on the corner of Washington and Highway 111. As you had indicated at our meeting, your staff would review our application and notify us of any follow -up require- ments. I have just received a letter. from Greg Trousdell outlining a number of points regarding the project and would welcome the opportunity to discuss these items with you at a meeting on August 28th at 10:00 AM. I look forward to meeting with you at that time. Yours sincerely, SIMON P ZA, INC. Philip M. Pead President PMP /ww cc: Fred Simon Tom Thornburgh Merlin Barth r P.O. BOX 461, 78 -611 HWY. 111, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 • PH.: 619/773 -2345 • FAX: 619/568 -4567 J GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF To: City of La Quinta Planning Division Attention: Greg Trousdell Re: Plot Plan 91 -466 Simon Plaza, Inc. With respect to the condition of the Fire Department requires the accordance with La Quinta Munici RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIDE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE • PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 (714) 657 -3183 August 13, 1991 ��M I AUG 15 Igo, V ua- Llh WINTA 'UNNING & DEVEto approval regarding the above referenced WIn, following fire protection measures be provided in pal Code and /or recognized fire protection standards: 1. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 gpm for a 3 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. Fire flow is based upon all buildings being equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 2. A combination of on -site and off -site Super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6" x 4" x 2J" x 2} "), will be located not less than 25' or more than 165' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit applicant /developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review /approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed /approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and operational prior to the start of construction. 4. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The 'post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). System plans must be submitted with a plan check /inspection fee to the Fire Department for review. A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. PLANNING DIVISION CA INDIO OFFICE ❑ TEMECULA OFFICE 79 -733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201 41002 County Center Drive, Suite 225, Temecula, CA 92390 (619) 342.8886 • FAX (619) 775 -2072 (714) 694 -5070 • FAX (714) 694 -5076 ❑ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501 (714) 275 -4777 • FAX (714) 369 -7451 printed on recycled paper 4. City of La Quinta 8/13/91 Re: PP 91 -466 Page 2. Simon Plaza, Inc. 5. Install a supervised waterflow fire alarm system as required by the Uniform Building Code. 6. Install a Hood Duct automatic fire extinguishing system. System plans must be submitted, along with a plan check/ inspection fee, to the Fire Department for review. 7. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet 410, but not less than 2A1OBC in rating. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 8. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, §503. 9. Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 10. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 11. Install a Class I Standpipe System. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed. A plan check fee must be paid to the Fire Department at the time building plans are submitted. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Planning & Engineering Staff at (619) 342 -8886. Sincerely, RAY REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By /er" ///'� Tom Hutchison Fire Safety Specialist � _ ` f} AT ER ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY '01STRIC� COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E. LEVY, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT 12, 19 91 OWEN McCO BERNARDINE SUTTON, SECRETARY August JOHN W. McFADDEN g OK, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH File: 0163.1 Planning Commission City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen: AUG 16 19G1 �a e r � LM qUo�9Ta Subject: Plot Plan 91 -466, Portion of NortheMING &DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Quarter, Section 30, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone X on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 55 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, C -,kc- �-r�'c' V Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer RF:lmf /e8 cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79 -733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY r 4gES POSTS W rn N � 2 � f1 � U.SMAIL rn United States Postal Service FP 7/ The United States Postal Service requests that the final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and the Public Works Department. 6Z��- 1 000 0 � 0 O , 00� Tihf 4 78 -105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 564 -5617 August 2, 1991 Mr. Philip M. Pead, President Simon Plaza, Incorporated PO Box 461 78 -611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 91 -466 Dear Mr. Pead: Thank you for submitting your Design Review application to our department earlier this month. We are required by Government Section 65943 to notify your that your preliminary application is incomplete for the following reasons: 1. A preliminary hydrology report is needed to identify storm water problems created by the development of this project. The study should analyze the site development problems and prescribe mitigating solutions to contain both future nuisance water and storm water on -site. 2. A traffic study is needed which is based on no left turn movements into or out of your project and the study should also examine a no right turn . lane at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street. Contact Mr. Steve Speer, Assistant City Engineer, for specific information dealing with peak hour traffic and the Washington Street Specific Plan (86 -007). 3. A filing fee of $266.80 for. your environmental work is needed. 4. Two more sets of gummed property owner labels are required. One set was submitted. 5. The landscape plan did not take into account the ultimate right -of -way dedication on Washington Street, and the current plan has trees in the City's public right -of -way. LTRGT.006�LING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - _17f�-QLIINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 ,w► 11�,; 4:. %' 6. Please prepare cross section drawings which delineate the relationship of the proposed building to all existing streets which border the perimeter of the site. We would like both east /west and north /south views through each proposed building complex and the plans should disclose all proposed building appearances (e.g. pedestrian arcades, building overhands, store -front locations, etc.) 7. The floor plan drawings. are too rough, could you please be more descriptive with your plans. These plans will be used to evaluate your proposed on -site parking requirements and to examine pedestrian corridors. The plans should be folded to 8 1/2" x 11" and one reduced copy is required. 8. A master sign program should be submitted which identifies both the proposed sign graphics and the types of signs to be installed. The concept should also include written text. It might be beneficial that your architect meet with a sign contractor if he does not have the time to prepare a plan for your project. 9. The Fire Marshal would like to see a list of the proposed type(s) of construction which will be used for each building (e.g. Type V -1 Hour). He needs this information to calculated the fire flow demand and examine other fire safety matters. It might also be helpful to indicate which buildings will be sprinklered. 10. The City's General Plan states that the City should pursue low density (low level) structures along major arterials. The City's policy is to require one story .structures within 150 -feet of the property line. Your proposal, as submitted does not meet this policy requirement; and presently, your 4 story office building is approximately 10 -feet from the new property line and the two story office complex is approximately 30 feet. The minimum requirement is 20 -feet for major. streets and 50 -feet for Highway 111. The CPS Zoning Standards require any building which is higher that 35 -feet (up to 50 -feet) shall have a minimum property line setback of not less than two feet for each one above 35 feet. (e.g. 50 -feet = 30 -foot setback).. Your project does not meet this requirement on the east property line nor at the intersection of Simon Drive and Washington Street. In summary, your plans are deficient. Please have your architect examine these design problems. We are presently circulating your .proposal with our other local public agencies, and we look forward to their written responses in a few weeks. We will forward any negative comments we receive to your office. LTRGT.006 /CS -2- ..r P When we have received all the necessary information for your file, we will schedule your case for .review by our Development Review Committee. We will notify you of this meeting once your file has been deemed complete. Thank you for your efforts thus far, and if you have any questions on your application, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN PUNNING '& DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Greg Trousdell Associate Planner GT:ccs cc: Mr. Merlin J. Barth, Architect 3S Partnership and Pomona First Federal LTRGT.006 /CS -3- n v w i 'r► 4tit 4 4 Qawrk 1 78-106 CALLE ESTADO — LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92263 • (619) 664 -2246 FAX (619) 664 -6617 FROM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIVISIOONN DATE: /: ubYC y Manager ,��Fl�ste Management /t��rincipal lic works /Engineering v�e�eral Telephone l-anner(s) _ F Marshal (OdN�� t/ yFra er Cable Vision Associate uilding & Safety Transit Planner(s) _ecrrial r of Commerce _!::5149,14ne altrans (District II) Assistant Agricultural Commission P�ner Irrigation City of Indian wells s-11anning _hern California Gas C� ty of Indio Director Sands School Dist. S Postal Service Coachella Valley School Dist. � !II . .Riverside County: �`�°�'`" CV Archaeological Society Planning Department Property l�UG 1 Eyrironmental Health Owners Association TRheriff s Department LA QUINTA CASE NO(S): i CITY O� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Anu S7_ 'C� �/ V /ems 1 �A � J �P /9 ��'�� I/`! / 1 ( ✓.J /� %J �-'7C.0 /� YTJ I.�: PROJECT LOCATION: - )Cu7_WZ5,S i The City of La Quinta Development Review Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the above referenced project(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect to: 1. Physical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, and /or services; 2., Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would miti- gate any potential adverse effects; b) or should apply to the project design; c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and 3. If you, find that the identified impacts effects on the environment which cannot please recommend the scope and focus of may be helpful. Please send your response by GU.S -T maps /plans if not needed for your files. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE meeting at La Date: IV61 Contact Person: 7el-6- 11,U L Ng k_ by: Comments m e Date a0 �� will have significant adverse be avoided through conditions, additional study(ies) which and return the Yod are invited to attend the Quinta City Hall scheduled for: Time:_ x_-�A p.s _lL Title: Ti t le Phone:) W- /J/I- Agency /Division Jc � L 4 4 QUM& 78-105 CALLE ESTADO — LA OUINTA. CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564 -2246 FAX (619) 5645617 FROM /: PLANNING i DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DATE: 1 1V C y Manager �iFl�ste Management /�:frincipal lic Works/Engineering v�Sp rat Telephone I-anner(s) f Marshal (o�o�9 t/ tea er Cable Vision Associate wilding & Safety / _!:�-SiiqLline Transit Planner(s) �Ch r of Commerce a trans (District II) Assistant Agricultural Commission P er _ utrial Irrigation City of Indian Wells anning hern California Gas gJty of Indio Director sert Sands School Dist. vTS Postal Service Coachella Valley School Dist. Riverside County: CV Archaeological Society Planning Department Property ironmental Health Owner's Association lEryu;heriffIs Department �; LA QUINTA CASE NOW : %�� i � �-! �� r T� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Al%�us S AUG 6 99c9 fe^_- S.lo C9� 0( R i��VMKV A 'L��INIPIG & D Vt6WL4CATION: S r ie :v4+ The City of La Quinta Development Review Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the above referenced project(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect to: 1. Physical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, and /or services; �t/otiE 2. Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would miti- gate any potential adverse effects; b) or should apply to the project desigia;c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and 3. If you find that the identified impacts will have significant adverse effects on the environment which cannot be avoided through conditions, please recommend the scope and focus of additional study(ies) which may be helpful. ^/p,t.4!5- Please send your response by 71JV6o S`T �6 , ON I and return the maps /plans if not needed for your files. You are invited to attend the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE meeting at La Quinta City Hall scheduled for: Date: /Vo s� /�S �a � Time: Q� Contact Person: �,�j -�s�_ uSD,- Title: Comments made by: `� O Title: �. Date: Phone: - 77 Agency /Division fir• 0 F, � 6� of p� 78-106 CALLE ESTADO — LA OUINTA. CALIFORNIA 82263 - 1618) 664 -2246 FAX (618) 664 -6617 FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DATE: qbY C y Manager ��Fla�s�e Management /t�6incipal lic Works /Engineering vie eral Telephone kanner(s) _ F Marshal(N u�);/ er Cable Vision Associate uilding & Safety / un ne Transit Planner(s) _A:fCFrial r of Commerce a trans (District II) Assistant Agricultural Commission P er Irrigation City of Indian Wells anning Ehern California Gas Cjty of Indio Director Sands School Dist. vVS Postal Service Coachella Valley School Dist. Riverside County: CV Archaeological Society Planning Department Property Eryyironmental Health Owner's Association l-theriff's Department LA QUINTA CASE NO (S) : �� / Z -4,J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 7L�_uE s7_ %� 'l% /nI� i`1G %U //7G,� U-S-e- PROJECT LOCATION: 7WeAS r The City of La Quinta Development Review Committee is conducting an initial environmental study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the above referenced project(s). Attached is the information submitted by the project proponent. Your comments are requested with respect to: 1. Physical impacts the project presents on public resources, facilities, and /or services; 2. Recommended conditions: a) that you or your agency believe would miti- gate any potential adverse effects; b) or should apply to the project design; c) or improvements to satisfy other regulations and concerns which your agency is responsible; and 3. If you find that the identified impacts will have significant adverse effects on the environment which cannot be avoided through conditions, please recommend the scope and focus of additional study(ies) which may be helpful. Please send your response by +Gus. — /S, l,�-ql and return the maps /plans if not needed for your files. -You are invited to attend the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE meeting at La Quinta City Hall scheduled for: Date: /L/o% ,�s�/�F�fa� Time: Contact Person: Title:�eSocf}7,� %��,h•�.. °t�` Comments made by: t, mss Title: 6�xoTN Date: /Z'`// Phone: Agency /Division 44 MEMORANDUM F �h OF TO: STAN SAWA, PRINCIPAL PLANNER FROM: JERRY HERMAN, PLANNING DIRECTO DATE: JULY 25, 1991 SUBJECT: THE SIMON APPLICATION Issues that need to be addressed on this project or information needed are: 1. Cross sections going east, west, north, and south. 2. Traffic study based on'the no right turn lane at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street. Contact Steve Speer for more specific information dealing with peak hour traffic and the Washington Street Specific Plan. 3. A hydrology study regarding the storm water created by the project. 4. A landscaping plan taking into account the ultimate right -of -way dedication. The current plan has trees in our right -of -way. MEMOJH.115 *************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * DATAQUICK INFORMATION NETWORK REPORT * * * Riverside *************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Prepared for: JOHN MEJAY & ASSOC JOHN MEJAY Provided by: Continental Lawyers Title Sales Rep . 1605 Spruce St. Prepared by: SHELLEY REYNOLDS Riverside, Ca. 92507 * Farms - 5 line : records 1 to 31 * * * - -- Search Criteria - -- * Parcel Number 617020017 OR 617020019 TO 617020025 OR 617020028 OR 6170510* * 27 TO 617051029 OR 617052001 OR 617052003 OR 617052021 OR 6* * 17052024 TO 617052031 OR 617040006 OR 604050002 TO 60405000* * 8 OR 604050011 OR 604050016 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 matching properties were found ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by of Continental Lawyers Title Copyright (c)1991 Dataqu_ Information Network (714 :75 -0771 Page 1 Prcl:604- 050 -002 Site: Ownr:TYNBERG,PETER L Mail:1599 VIA NORTE *PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 12/89 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $780,818 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 8.45 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -003 Site: Ownr:WASHINGTON,ADAMS LP Mail:2377 CRENSHAW BLV STE 300 *TORRANCE, CA 90501 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 01/89 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $2,950,543 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 12.16 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -004 Site:78520 HIGHWAY 111 *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:WASHINGTON,ADAMS LP Mail:2377 CRENSHAW BLV STE 300 *TORRANCE, CA 90501 Use:MISC. COMMERCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 01/89 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $1,095,865 Imp: 77% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 19,166 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604 -050 -005 Site:78483 HWY 111 *LA QUINTA CA 92253 Ownr:MARUKO INC Mail:614 W 6TH ST *LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 Use:MISC. COMMERCIAL Ph: Xmpt:. Tfr: Date: 07/90+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $922,684 Imp: 66% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0006 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.10 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -006 Site: Ownr:ONE ELEVEN INV CO Mail:P 0 BOX 6030 *NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $75,245 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 11,761 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -007 Site: Ownr:ONE ELEVEN INV CO Mail:P 0 BOX 6030 *NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 09/86 Loans: Yb: Sgft:* Assed: $9,232 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 12,196 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -008 Site:78425 HWY 111 *LA QUINTA CA 92253 Ownr:MARUKO INC Mail:614 W 6TH ST *LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 Use:MISC. COMMERCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 07/90+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $5,725,121 Imp: 80% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0003 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4.07 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -011 Site: Ownr:DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERT Mail:5795 FISCHER RD *RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $112 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3,484 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:604- 050 -016 Site: Ownr:ONE ELEVEN INV CO Mail:P O BOX 6030 *NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $222,882 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0005 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 34,848 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- Copyright (c)1991 Dataqui Information Network (714 ,75 -0771 Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -017 Site: Ownr:WASHINGTON,ADAMS LP Mail:2377 CRENSHAW BLV STE 300 *TORRANCE, CA 90501 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 01/89+ Loans: $2,500 Yb: Sgft: Assed: $7,038,000 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 49.54 A -------------------------------------- =--------------------------------------- Prcl:617- 020 -019 Site:78611 HIGHWAY 111 *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:SIMON FAMILY PARTNERS Mail:78611 HIGHWAY 111 *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:MISC. COMMERCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 03/83 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $2,592,576 Imp: 88% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0001 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 3.90 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -020 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 1461 *FRESNO, CA 93716 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 02/88+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $41,410 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0002 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 23,958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -021 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 1461 *FRESNO, CA 93716 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 02/88+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $70,016 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0003 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 40,510 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -022 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 1461 *FRESNO, CA 93716 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 02/88+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $57,971 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0004 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 33,541 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -023 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 1461 *FRESNO, CA 93716 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 02/88+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $42,914 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0005 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 24,829 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -024 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 110 *POMONA, CA 91769 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: $545,000F Date: 12/88 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $613,757 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0006 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.01 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 020 -025 Site: Ownr:DAVIDSON,JAMIE L Mail:P 0 BOX 1461 *FRESNO, CA 93716 Use:VACANT COMMRCIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 02/88+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $137,771 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: P -0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1.83 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 040 -006 Site:46135 WASHINGTON ST *INDIO, CA Ownr:KIERNAN,EARL R &FLOREN Mail:13420 NEWPORT AVE STE H *TUSTIN, CA 92680 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 04/78 Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $160,471 Imp: 32% Phone: Tr: 00000 -00 Lot: -0000 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 17.77 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- Copyright (c)1991 Dataqu_ Information Network (714 175 -0771 Page 3 Prcl:617- 051 -027 Site:78510 SINGING PALMS DR *LA QUINTA,. CA 92253 Ownr:ORME,DAVID E Mail:78510 SINGING PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: 564 -4640 Xmpt: HOME Tfr: $109,500 Date: 12/82 Loans: $79,500 Yb: 78 Sqft: 1,600 Assed: $125,775 Imp: 75% Phone:564 -4640 Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0025 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 051 -028 Site:78550 SINGING PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:FIORE,ROBERT Mail:78550 SINGING PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: $95,000 Date: 11/86 Loans: $93,420 Yb: 78 Sqft: 1,600 Assed: $97,630 Imp: 72% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0026 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 051 -029 Site: Ownr:HUERTA,WILFRED &DOREEN Mail:29580 POPPY MEADOW ST *CANYON COUNTRY, CA 91351 Use:VAC RESIDENTIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: $32,000F Date: 12/88 Loans: $22,000 Yb: Sqft: Assed: $30,600 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0027 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -001 Site:46290 CAMEO PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:VANDORN,JAMES E &SHERR Mail:46290 CAMEO PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: HOME Tfr: Date: 08/84 Loans: Yb: 78 Sqft: 1,920 Assed: $99,694 Imp: 69% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0006 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4,356 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -003 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:VACANT MISC Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89 Loans: Yb: Sqft: Assed: $15,080 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0008 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl :617- 052 -021 Site:46405 WASHINGTON ST *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:PRICE,KENNETH F &BECKY Mail:46405 WASHINGTON ST *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: $79,000 Date: 12/86 Loans: $79,874 Yb: 82 Sqft: 1,832 Assed: $82,773 Imp: 74% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0002 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -024 Site:46285 WASHINGTON ST *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:WEBER,WAYNE W &AUDRY M Mail:46285 WASHINGTON ST *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: HOME Tfr: Date: 08/88 Loans: Yb: 72 Sqft: 1,872 Assed: $48,443 Imp: 87% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0005 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 9,147 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -026 Site:46370 CAMEO PALMS DR *LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:SINGLE RESIDENCE Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: 33 Sqft: 2,188 Assed: $151,238 Imp: 90% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0003 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 9,583 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -027 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:VAC RESIDENTIAL Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: Sqft: Assed: $110 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0003 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 435 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- Copyright (c)1991 Dataqu. Information Network (714 .75 -0771 Page 4 Prcl:617- 052 -028 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:VACANT MISC Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $12,926 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0004 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 9,147 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -029 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:MISC STRUCT ONLY Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $9,318 Imp: 76% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0004 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 1,306 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Prcl:617- 052 -030 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:VACANT MISC Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $13,646 Imp: 0% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 8,276 --------------------------------------------------- 7 -------------------------- Prcl:617- 052 -031 Site: Ownr:TOSTI,F B &MARLENE M Mail:4712 E AVENUE R12 *PALMDALE, CA 93550 Use:MISC STRUCT ONLY Ph: Xmpt: Tfr: Date: 06/89+ Loans: Yb: Sgft: Assed: $7,357 Imp: 80% Phone: Tr: 02043 -00 Lot: L -0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 871 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 617-02 I-R A 020. C2 N //2 SEC. 30, 7.5S, R. 7E n+w, MAP �S FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 020 -G09 too�_T 6 02G -042 604 60 .r.,.. I u.r, ,..,..� / 20 24 1,...�. ,• .r, .,•,.. I,... 29 ti CL O 23 O \ CEO J:AVA,r r 400 - oa. ti r _ °1 �Z/ ` \ ` \ r9a O,Q��q /4 14.69 �l olq rE"� Y� ♦ AC M. .I � ` . O Y O.l,ACA.. - �• pp�91 ► , r Q /9 �o SJ. JOIr. M • / 6 ` w at C I oe l r� � w � J 06 /4.4J/et APP AI I ` ` + Pe. 2 3/ Ex. O7 R.•I /B /IC. S 1.11 •., 1- w•M �' [`11 f.• ...,.,4 Ai t,`x •�.• ' r ••t Dort ay.r Ja.Ja urr Ar Ja A,.. rs I I 2 '10' MOP ,,,,,a „ „ PM. 60 118 PCICO .AFB », o.6akt PM 113149 -50 ° 184 18 Jvn o Y•a •. LILJ' .l OA M. R/S /s /SS, z5143, MO 40/d2 -8i, 4116 -7 - 60'Rar 0..mJr .:SSESSOR'S MAP 09 617 Ff. 02 CVCNO.1 /N, R/M XJ- R/Y - /el• 0, MtP62/ -F 31691 4119 R/S 5/39, 7130, 7/91, 0/74,39/598 RIVERSIDE COMM, CAUF � 4 , x n APRIL 1967 617-04 T. C. A. 020 -003 BK. 6/3 i ,e 1 I ,vr. ft. 'Jll S 1 !♦ f t 'L IUJl i POR E 112 NW 114 SEC. 30. T. 5S, R. 7E OA7A.G4.O PLAT, MB.40181 -83, 4116 -7 60'Ra. per ins1. R/S 5136, 7/91, 11189 31691 4159 ASSE'SSOR'S MAP SK. 617 PS 04 RIVERS /DE CWN",, CAUF APR IL 1967 0 14 0 617-05 T. C. A. 020 -003 0 POR. E 112 NW 114 SEC. 30, T. 5S, R. 7E - - WASH /N6FON - - : - : - - STRE£'T s _ ~ O e ^� h CAMEO PA M DRIVE 04 1 = .= ti y .` �� r N O Gp oJ\v J• r k ; h ,4 N .....a . a. ,• t O O O, O �i�ttttlJ MB. 4116 -7 Tfoc12043 •gym, - „v,n � h Ea a I M.C. 4WG /-GYJ //Ocl L /// iu LLT,: q/S IJ/!9, MiI611 -f A/S S /S6, 7 /9t ASSESSOR'S MAP ex 617 AS. OS RIVERS/OE COUNTY, awo �. APRIL 1967 i 1 t;roo-Af 2 5 SJfJ•S � ��7�� "..rte @2 Ac M O �� e Q Poi 3 I r .p 0.93 At Ys nary[ y � • � \ � OHO 02C O. SSAC.N�. Par. 3. 9OAc. Ni / \ 1 • q r , �� j i P suo acct _ -- A Po/.2 It OMCA _ ,� _ , I •' 0 0 4922Ac. Gr o- 4808Ac. M! IILY_ RC( � 6�A0(Y J rx c /7 49-54 Ac r . I i 25 -/9 -4 617-05 T. C. A. 020 -003 / ° - /OO, I FOR E 112 NW 114 SEC. 30, T. 5S, R. 7E 02 ,i„•,!t v /io /i( .n /iar TN. "43 s rotor os� M. riir — WASH /N6-PON — — — : — — STREET — — ti N ,Y O O O � �� I! I �,n O �• O • ° N N CAMEO PA M _ _ DRIVE Q �O il- I :< �.,... - L M. B. 4116 - 7 Tract 20 43 r- n t* rs M. B. 4081-83 Tract 2117 DA iA :RIS 11189, MAP 621 -F R/S 5/36, 7/92 ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 617 P8. 05 RIVERS10£ COUNTY, CAL /F. APRIL 1967 ,k je MIS A(AP 6 FOR ASSESSA/ENr PURPOSES ONLY POR. 3112, SEC. 19, T- 5S.,R•7E. C. V.C. W.D. srORM O 4A OL/IMU m a �3 - ciry •� t rR.q 075- per. 3 Paz Z . T. R -A. Oa, -003 • •`` /9 F . /8 = 3 O Z.00Ac 2.33Ac. ' c •°. 9.43A[.r o' Z. o m .v .A. r4a/S, ZZ7 C 4� LqL Br •J6 G w ^ , 2DOAc /NV C /Ty L/N/rS O/AN M•E�Ly. C/rY 4 is < 195 Ae r DIrA: RIG /J 7 R! /I J, "Z$/" A SSESA7R'S MAP BK. 604 PG 05 RIVERS /OE COUNTY, CALIF I � (I � , e 1 1 ss1 h � � In�kol ms's I � ��Q C Q Q O i 0 , �N vQnh �. ZO• ob it � �.o•. .n• IL � }.�Y -09 I . 6 7 i • .'� 006tAe is ••sf f YAO. O.R. IJWIM aaJ *lvJrR. tI/77i rr/rt /I/ � �' �Sw OOR. Jt !/k, sec. itcOR. Jt /h, sec. U 6/3- 77 rR.A. 016 -04Q 604-05 020 -OOZ 020 -ow 020-010 020 - O-v 075 -004 075 -0 /Z 020 -043 000 -042 M1 A� I Z MA 04V -03? 1r4tI7 rt /It � A� � c A 6/7 02 a.. New Q70- - K t0 4rr• 9 PAf. 124147- 49 Parcel Map 19028 PM. 160187- 88 Porce / Mop 22596 NOV 1989 JPH C. o - �Ev� B m —.m C v a 0 T>';— r m mu`oa� \AC.� o O 9 0 O O pe 00 O � J 1 M1 A� I Z MA 04V -03? 1r4tI7 rt /It � A� � c A 6/7 02 a.. New Q70- - K t0 4rr• 9 PAf. 124147- 49 Parcel Map 19028 PM. 160187- 88 Porce / Mop 22596 NOV 1989 JPH � � � � Z� � � L\- Z- Nfw �4 -�1wvw �H~L 4 ww J raN II i � n III �MH p z n� , 116 "m FE ons m ,l VIII � n. — 11111111111 — ®9 as E-. a 3 _ w m w ® i w � O x L t � t WA <� Zi !7 1® c � x cs® DD r- b 00 H � 3 dam 3 w sAE CAE =� Is4i�i4i4? 33��33�3 4i @��g8i3 3�9 �3�� atl t3 � ;51 Hill n6t :oae8e 9 araa3ee4o: � aao t, kF1.11.11 �1� 1-144-3 r \ z. I 1.; l �E Ci ��•/ as �M'� � ed j A a q,;? s?' 1 ' i I m 2MOLPLeu un n IBM . �. wrr �rpa - ,Zw s r wa R 4.O�M +•- � �I�a.w we..- -wM1ar Mww R/,w,a�� W M� sws.rr iii° w icy ym Bs �, Y y W r .s�•w .r...� IM ♦.'w o'+Y l�ww'HTJ m� Q� [`�VId aRbOd OOF " -, '" -{- Ma tj 110(' gro,aw4p) fa rrb W6A v A ,Ca q,,4,1 5:113- 413 -018 617- 0 ?0 -01.0 CVO%'D P.O. Brix 1058 Ccachella, CA 92236 513- 770 -01 ?. Desert Ou tt�oor Adver tisin T -- 5795 Pox Srrina Blv Riverside, CA 92507 - - 613 - -7n -017 One Eleven Inv. Co. C/o Burnett Dev 500 E. Cordcva Pasadena, CA 613-770 -018 One Eleven Inv. Co c% Services P. o. Box 4 E1 Tcro, CA.. 92630 91101 - 61 -3- 770 -0- n One Eleven Inv. Co. 21791 Lake Forest Dr. 200 El Toro, California . 92630 Y 617 - 020 -017 Bora Farner Foci ties CcrT, 2no S. Michigan Ave. Chicago, Illinois 11.E e- j0AW.*- Y1 V Co. P 0, box & r-> 6e -aeJ& 16.4- —r - 1-- C'JV V" i 617 =02 0 -022 617 - 020 -023 Simcn Motors Inc. 78611 Pial -way 111 La nuinta, CA 92253 I)2t 1111onc �( James Caron 1 Hidden Valley Read Dr. Rollirx7 Fills Estates, CA a 90274 13q II �►�t�rIO�KL 1J� I I f�r:� 604 - 050 -002 Peter L T-- y_nber-g 1599 Via Norte Palm Springs, CA 92262 604 - 050 -003 604 - 050 -004 Adams -Lp- Washington - - - - -- Adams -Lp- Washington - 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Torrance, CA 90501 Torrance, CA 90501 604 - 050 -005 617- 052 -026 604- 050 -006 617- 052 -027 604- 050 -007 - -Wayne -W - -& Audry -Weber - Maruko_Inc- —_._ Tosti One- Eleven Inv -Co --- One -E -1 -even Inv -Co 4712 E Avenue 614 W 6th St 4712 E Avenue P 0 Box 6030 La Quinta, CA 92253 P 0 Box 6030 93550 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -008 _- F - -B -& Marlene Tosti — 604- 050 -011 604- 050 -016 Tosti Mar -uko -Inc 4712 E Avenue Desert Outdoor- - Advertis - -+ One Eleven Inv Co R12 614 W 6th St Palmdale, CA 5795 Fischer Rd Palmdale, CA P 0 Box 6030 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Riverside, CA 92507 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617 - 020 -017 617 - 020 -019 617 - 020 -020 - Adams-Lp- Washington - - - -- - - -- Simon -- Fami- l-y -Partner shi - -- Jamie - -L - Davidson - - - - 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 78611 Highway 111 P 0 Box 1461 Torrance, CA 90501 La Quinta, CA 92253 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -021 617 - 020 -022 617- 020 -023 Jamie -L -David -son -- Jamie -L— Davidson - - -t- Jamie -L Davidson P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -024 617- 020 -025 617 - 040 -006 - - Jamie - -I, - Davidson- -- - - Jamie -L- Davidson- - - - - -- i - -Earl R - Kiernan - - -- -- P 0 Box 110 P 0 Box 1461 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Pomona, CA 91769 Fresno, CA 93716 Tustin, CA 92680 617 - 051 -027 78510 Singing Palms Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -001 ---- James -E -- Vandorn- -- 46290 Cameo Palms La Quinta,.CA Dr 92253 617 - 051 -028 617- 051 -029 Robert -Fiore Wilfred & Doreen- Huerta 78550 Singing Palms Dr 29580 Poppy Meadow St La Quinta, CA 92253 Canyon Country, C 91351 617 - 052 -003 617- 052 -021 F -B- -& - Marlerie-- Tosti- Kenneth F .& Becky Price 4712 E Avenue R12 46405 Washington St Palmdale, CA 93550 La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -024 617- 052 -026 617- 052 -027 - -Wayne -W - -& Audry -Weber - -- F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 46285 Washington St 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 617 - 052 -028 617- 052 -029 i 617- 617 -052 -030 _- F - -B -& Marlene Tosti — F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 �/` �L \� c�J � �, �� -, ��i ��a1 �� %� _, 1�� a��; �i 1599 Via Norte_ 6-17-052- 003- --- 2377` Crenshaw �BlvvSte 3 2377JCrenshaw1BlvUSte 3 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Torrance, CA 90501 Torrance, CA 90501 604 - 050 -005 R12 604- 050 -006 604 - 050 - 007___ Palmdale, CA - --- Maruko Inc -- - �-- -One- Eleven - Inv - -Co ___ -_ _ - One Eleven Inv Co _ 614 W 6th St Wayne W & Audry Weber P 0 Box 6030 P 0 Box 6030 F B & Marlene Tosti Los Angeles, CA 90017 Newport Beach, CA 926581 Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -008 93550 604 - 050 -011 604 - 0_50 -016 Maruko--Inc- - - Desert Outdoor Advertises One Eleven Inv Co Tosti 614 W 6th St 4712 E Avenue R12 5795 Fischer Rd P 0 Box 6030 4712 E Avenue R12 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Riverside, CA 92507 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617- 020 -017 A ams -Lp -- Washington - -__ 617- 020 -019 + 617- 020 -020 Simon Family Partnershi Jamie L Davidson 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 78611 Highway 111 P 0 Box 1461 Torrance, CA 90501; La Quinta, CA 92253' Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -021 617- 020 -022 0.20 - 023_ -- --- - - - - -- Jamie L- -Davidson _ - __6.1.7_- Jamie L Davidson Y Jamie L Davidson P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 .Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716. Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -024 I 617 - 020 - 025__ ____. -___— {_ __617- 040 - 006 - - - Jamie L Davidson Jamie L Davidson Earl R Kiernan P 0 Box 110 P 0 Box 1461 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Pomona, CA 91769; Fresno, CA 93716 Tustin, CA 92680 617- 051 -027 David E Orme 78510 Singing La Quinta, CA ____6.1_7=051_-028----- - -- 617 - 051 -029 Robert Fiore Wilfred & Doreen Huerta Palms Dr 78550 Singing Palms Dr i 29580 Poppy Meadow St 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Canyon Country, C 91351 _ 617 - 052 -001 _. 6-17-052- 003- --- - -- -- James E Vandorn F B & Marlene Tosti Kenneth F & Becky Price 46290 Cameo Palms Dr 4712 E Avenue R12 46405 Washington St La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 La Quinta, CA 92253 617_0.5.2 -0.24 - t- 617 - 052 - -02 -6 -- Wayne W & Audry Weber F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 46285 Washington St 4712 E Avenue R12 j 4712 E Avenue R12 La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 _61- 7- 052-028— —617=05-2029- -- 617 = 052 -030 F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 All wig , 0 604 - 050 -002 Peter L Tynberg 1599 Via Norte Palm Springs, CA 92262 604 - 050 -005 Maruko Inc 614 W 6th St Los Angeles, CA 90017 604 - 050 -008 Maruko Inc 614 W 6th St Los Angeles, CA 604 - 050 -003 604- 050 -004 Adams Lp Washington Adams Lp Washington 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 31 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Torrance, CA 90501 Torrance, CA 90501 604- 050 -006 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 Newport Beach, CA 604 - 050 -011 604 - 050 -007 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 92658 Newport Beach, CA 92658 --4 Desert Outdoor Advertis 5795 Fischer Rd 90017 Riverside, CA 92507. 604 - 050 -016 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617- 020 -017 617 -020 -019 1 617- 020 -020 Adams Lp Washington Simon Family Partnershi Jamie L Davidson 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 78611 Highway 111 P 0 Box 1461 Torrance, CA 90501 La Quinta, CA 92253 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -021 617 - 020 -022 617- 020 -023 Jamie L Davidson Jamie L Davidson Jamie L Davidson P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno,__ CA 93716 _- 617- 020 -024 617 - 020 -025 617- 040 -006 Jamie L Davidson Jamie L Davidson Earl R Kiernan P 0 Box 110 P 0 Box 1461 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Pomona, CA 91769 Fresno, CA 93716 Tustin,_CA -92680 617 - 051 -027 617 - 051 -028 617- 051 -029 David E Orme Robert Fiore Wilfred & Doreen Huerta 78510 Singing Palms Dr 78550 Singing Palms Dr 29580 Poppy Meadow St La Quinta, CA — 92253 La Quinta, CA 92.25- 3_.- _Cany_on- Count r -y -; -C 91351 - 617 - 052 -001 617 - 052 -003 617- 052 -021 James E Vandorn F B & Marlene Tosti Kenneth F & Becky Price 46290 Cameo Palms Dr 4712 E Avenue R12 46405 Washington St La Quinta, YCA 92253 - - -- Palmdale, -_CA 9.3.550 -,—La- Quinta, C -A -- --- 92253 -- 617 - 052 -024 Wayne W & Audry Weber 46285 Washington St La Quinta, CA 92253 617- 052 -026 617 - 052 -027 F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 -,Palmdale -, -CA 93550 -4 Palmdale, —CA 935-50— 617- 052 -028 617- 052 -029 617 - 052 -030 F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 i 4712 E Avenue R12 ��` ��. ,�,.. �. -L° .�-- a �" !. ,.�, ; �� -��.. 604 - 050 -002 604 - 050 -003 604 - 050 -004 Peter L Tynberg - -- 15-99 Via- Norte - - -- - - Adams Lp Washington - - - Adams Lp Washington _p 9 Palm Springs, CA 92262 2377- Crenshaw Blv Ste 3+ Torrance, CA 90501 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Torrance, CA 90501 604 -050 -005 604- 050 -006 604 - 050 -007 Maruko Inc One Eleven Inv Co__ Eleven Ins 614- W -- 6th -St t-- _ P__0 Box-- 60_36____ - __One -Co P 0 Box 6030 -- Los Angeles, CA 90017 Newport Beach, CA 92658, Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -008 604 - 050 -011 604- 050 -016 Maruko Inc - -- 14 -6th - - -- — Desert Outdoor Advertise_ _ One Eleven- Inv -Co- - - -- -- - W St 5795 Fischer Rd P 0 Box 6030 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Riverside, CA 92507 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617 - 020 -017 617- 020 -019 617- 020 -020 Adams Lp Washington _ - -- Simon - _Family- Partnershi-r -- -- -Jamie L- Davidson— - 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 78611 Highway 111 P 0 Box 1461 Torrance, CA 90501, La Quinta, CA 92253 Fresno, CA 93716 617- 020 -021 617- 020 -022 617- 020 -023 Jamie L Davidson Jamie__L- Davidson - - - -- - -+ - -- Jam- ie -L -- Davidson --- -- - P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716! Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -024 617 - 020 -025 617- 040 -006 Jamie L Davidson _Jamie -L-- Davidson - -- P 0 Box 110 Pomona, CA 91769 P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716' 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Tustin, CA 92680 617- 051 -027 617- 051 -028 617- 051 -029 David E Orme ,- 78510 Singing Palms Dr - Robe -r-t - Fiore- - t 78550 Singing Palms Dr - Wilfred & Doreen Huerta 29580 La Quinta, CA 92253: La Quinta, CA 92253 Poppy Meadow Canyon Country, C St 91351 617- 052 -001 617- 052 -003 617- 052 -021 - James_E Vandor.n -- 46290 -- + -- F -B - &- Marlene -Tost -t- -- _ Kenneth F & _ Becky Price Cameo Palms Dr 4712 E Avenue R12 46405 Washington St La Quinta,.CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 i La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -024 617- 052 -026 _Wayne- W- &- Audry- -Weber F --B -& Marlene - Tosti 46285 Washington St 4712 E Avenue R12 La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 61_7 - 052 -027 _ F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 t 617- 052 -028 617- 052 -029 __617- 052 -030 ---- F -B - &- Mar - lease - Tosti �F -B -& Marlene Tosti F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 I 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 ; Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 l4® s s..a,�r. v' wivw,nrnm vecettsct kt ® EBrcH r MIR C A NAM 10 EON== Imo.. . 'CL''1 '.�' \►.• `4►J sic oy 'sJ Mm Ho N 111 Nu� Y 1111 11 �� MEM a o IM o, c o 0 milli[ 101 YOIf�YA 4' YM�IIIIII'GY \L01 vrceitsca �-- ®wserru r aessa o ' F�s L__ T, m d i v, v i MINISIMID n W HTRRfl .L X11 TUTIBAAA n pa�n.nen�ru .n reenoe we nrcnwrc o ` ' � | uIll I I mosommon AIm."Y " YMYM61 tvinm it, cjI ! ®WEgrim T Bvill Q � C/ t l I 4 J \\ tdiLl-f-, F� � �s C ua monsoon niiiiiIii 8TRU It Kld&9m r�aruaae MW �t AY7MW .n rYUals 1�1FtNlt 1111111 oil 111-1-j 1. 1. wx�ave u' vpvueiw'er.exw P9C911CCL r r - ws�riK I� IPC811ECy - - REErtH T BUIR a e e � Q �a ©o pollcl vlwronl 101 YOUI`IA 4' VNYN�N1'CY �IM1 9BCE1dEC�6 '� I o m S L 7H 1 �r H Z � i ui�O .m_ S JCZE: CIE b'�i� +A A'If' MMI X111■ � � _- ;1111' IICmI IIIIIIIII I:Illlli' IIJI IItl: 1111 um 1111nI• 1 unnm mom .un uu ,NINE, .IW: 1®nl IIIIIIIII 1:11111111 1.1.1.1 Illf 11011 – •�• "• �' ��• y� �I rlm l Imnn nnlm " iminrl Ml - '�.m� Ir ®I Ilmnn anon I uumll nu :nen Imnn. umm :nmm an T� IS ' �ianr. - lunn7� -- -- rnrinLm:• nnnu bi , u,nvm -0 :;r�l. 1!lillll' Illinll I mll I1'�1 OIL I�;�;;I "� O a ue � E+ Ss3 C s �s ®a ©e •- �,n.� -,� ,,,;; _ _� 1 �� ■�� ■SAO IM �OttnA U' vwvw[i�'CV wM VICE U ®uzs�rt� r BBBS� milli 1 nwr�n Wei AU .MVwn�•awa vscatlscz ®w��rcH r e►��e 0 11M! ll�! 701 YOfE�YA LL' INYMfIII'h IAM veca►acca Slug ® WZYMN r $asaa �.w DD 5 H O L W �m w YOS�v�u• vwHnw•amw -19ilill AIR vecettici 0 111010 0ri t o6 1a, ` F.1 I 9 DI' ::�YuiDl►lY PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION I, V CITIFY THAT ON n 19 A CRIED PROPERTY MOBS LIST WAS PREPARED BY OUR COMPANY, CONTINENTAL LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY, PURSUANT TO THE APPLICATION RE UIREMENM FURNISHED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DERAR'M4T. THE SAID LIST IS A �� I`�� I� � � ��ul• • ► • � .I►IDIGs�•��Y.�I�.`: 1:_ 1D.N �i�• "J'JiNY : ►It • /Y.ID�; PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN M" FEET OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THE APPLICA- TION AND IS BASED UPON THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS. I FURTHER CITIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FILED IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST • � • 91• I• DI's. � ••'•�- � •'- DI• •,• IS• I •' • �• GROUNDS FOR REJDCTION OR DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION. I NAME: KIRSTEN DEUEL TITLE /REGISTRATION: CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE /SPECIAL PROJECTS PHONE NO: (714) 784- 2120.OR (714) 781 -7000 DIRECT LINE ADDRESS: 1605 SPRUCE STREET / RIVERSIDE, CA. 92507 SIGNATURE DATE :1 / CASE NO. X14 %SID I ?I '012� ag �w' ii 604 - 050 -002 Peter L Tynberg I' 1599 Via Norte Palm Springs, CA 92262;1 I' 604 - 050 -005 Maruko Inc 614 W 6th St 4 Los Angeles, CA 90017) 604 - 050 -008 Maruko Inc 614 W 6th St Los Angeles, CA 90017 617 - 020 -017 Adams Lp Washington 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Torrance, CA 90501] 617 - 020 -021 Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -024 Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 110 Pomona, CA 91769 617- 051 -027 David E Orme 78510 Singing Palms Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -001 James E Vandorn 46290 Cameo Palms Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -024 Wayne W & Audry Weber 46285 Washington St La Quinta, CA 92253 t 617 - 052 -028 F B & Marlene Tosti I� 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 i I I 604 - 050 -003 11� Adams Lp Washington 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3'11 Torrance, CA 90501) I, 604 - 050 -006 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -011 Desert Outdoor Advertis 5795 Fischer Rd Riverside, CA 92507 617- 020 -019 Simon Family Partnershi 78611 Highway 111 La Quinta, CA 92253 617- 020 -022 Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -025. Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716! iI 617 - 051 -028 Robert Fiore 78550 Singing Palms Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -003 I �I F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550)1 I 617 - 052 -026 F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 �I Palmdale, CA 93550 l 604 - 050 -004 Adams Lp Washington 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Torrance, CA 90501) 604 - 050 -007 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -016 One Eleven Inv Co P 0 Box 6030 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617- 020 -020 Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -023 Jamie L Davidson P 0 Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 040 -006 Earl R Kiernan 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Tustin, CA 92680 617- 051 -029 1 Wilfred & Doreen Huerta' 29580 Poppy Meadow St Canyon Country, C 91351 617 - 052 -021 Kenneth F & Becky Price 46405 Washington St La Quinta, CA 92253; 617 - 052 -027 F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550) 617 - 052 -029 II 617- 052 -030 F B & Marlene Tosti II F B & Marlene Tosti 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550; '( Palmdale, CA 93550, �� " o� �� ---, � �, r �� s `�� 9� �� /�� • f T � `'� �� s T �� . o�� '`�� , �� .1�� \ c � Q� 617 - 052 -031 I i I i I4c** ij it it ii i� ii J I� i� I I � T6. 4 On sr- L -L od-l� LtNN, nt& 604 - 050 -002 604- 050 -003 ; 604 - 050 -004 Peter L Tynberg _; Adams Lp Washington Adams Lp Washington 1599 Via Norte 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 Palm Springs, CA 92262 � Torrance, CA 90501 I Torrance, CA 90501 604 - 050 -005 i 604 - 050 -006 604 - 050 -007 Maruko Inc One Eleven Inv Co ( One Eleven Inv Co 614 W 6th St P 0 Box 6030 P 0 Box 6030 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Newport Beach, CA 92658 604 - 050 -008 604- 050 -011 604 - 050 -016 Maruko Inc i Desert Outdoor Advertis- -�-One Eleven_Inv Co __ 614 W 6th St 5795 Fischer Rd i P 0 Box 6030 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Riverside, CA 92507 Newport Beach, CA 92658 617 - 020 -017 617- 020 -019 1 617 - 020 -020 Adams _Lp Washington- _ _ Simon Family Partnershi -j- _Jamie - -L- Davidson- 2377 Crenshaw Blv Ste 3 78611 Highway 111 P 0 Box 1461 Torrance, CA 90501 La Quinta, CA 92253 I Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -021 617 - 020 -022 617 - 020 -023 Jamie L Davidson Jamie_L_Davidson- Jamie_L- Davidson_ P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 P O Box 1461 Fresno, CA 93716 Fresno, CA 93716 i Fresno, CA 93716 617 - 020 -024 617 - 020 -025 I 617 - 040 -006 _Jamie L_ Davidson , Jamie _L_Davidson__------f_Ear-1 -R- Kiernan - - - -- - -- P 0 Box 110 P 0 Box 1461 13420 Newport Ave Ste H Pomona, CA 91769 Fresno, CA 93716 1 I Tustin, CA 92680 617 - 051 -027 617- 051 -028 617- 051 -029 David- E_Orme Robert -Fiore -- -- -1- - Wil- f- r -ed -& Doreen- Huer -ta- 78510 Singing Palms Dr' ! 78550 Singing Palms Dr 29580 Poppy Meadow St La Quinta, CA 92253 La Quinta, CA 92253 Canyon Country, C 91351 617 - 052 -001 617- 052 -003 617- 052 -021 - __James_ -E Vandor.n - - ---- F- B- &- Ma -r -l- ene- T -osti- Kenneth -F - &- Becky- -P-rce = 46290 Cameo Palms Dr 4712 E Avenue R12 46405 Washington St La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 I La Quinta, CA 92253 617 - 052 -024 617- 052 -026 617- 052 -027 -- Wayne- - W-- &- Audr-y- Weber- -- F-- B- &- Ma- r -lene - T- osti - - -- -- - -F- B-- &- Ma -r -l- ene - Tosti - -- - - 46285 Washington St 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 La Quinta, CA 92253 Palmdale, CA 93550 j Palmdale, CA 93550 617- 052 -028 617- 052 -029 i 617 - 052 -030 - -- - F B - &- -Ma -r- lene- T- osti - -- -+ ---- F- B- &- Ma-r -l- ene-- Tost-i -F -B- &-- Marlene- -Tosti -- - - -- - 4712 E Avenue R12 4712 E Avenue R12 1 4712 E Avenue R12 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 Palmdale, CA 93550 Mr. Greg Trousdell Planning Department City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Greg: January 6, 1992 i n JAN 0 8 1992 pp�� CITY OF tom, OpUNTA (y P�Id'63JPING 0UikRTtye Ft:�l't We are submitting eighteen copies of the new drawings for the Simon Plaza development folded 82" X 11 ", which consists of: Site Plan dated 12 -20 -91 Bowling Alley /Fitness Center Curly's Bowl Jonathan's Restaurant Opthalmologist Office Parking Garage dated 12 -30 -91 Office Building on Simon Drive with view of . Parking- Garage dated-12-30 =91. Medical ;.Office Building '.on.Washin� ton ' S't . dated-.12-20-91. Floor`Plan for Medical O'ffice.Building dated 12- 20 -91. Cross Section of Elevations dated 12- 30 -91. It is extremely important to point out that we have made very significant changes as requested by the Planning Commission. Please note that another floor has been eliminated from the Parking Garage which was requested by the commissioners. The parking structure has been reduced from an original 192,000 square `feet to 168,000. square feet to currently 132,000 square feet. Other reductions have been made as follows: Bowling Alley originally planned for 41,000 square feet reduced to 37,000 square feet. Fitness Center originally planned for 20,000 square feet reduced to 17,000 square feet, currently 12,000 sq.ft. Medical Office Building on Washington Street originally planned for 80,000 square feet, reduced to 61,000 square feet, currently reduced to 37,000 square feet. Office Building on south end of Parking Garage originally planned for 36,000 square feet, reduced to 34,000 square feet, currently reduced to.17,900 square feet. Pad Building on corner originally planned for 9,000 square feet, currently reduced to 8,000 square feet. Family style restaurant, -named Jonathan's originally - planned for 4,000 square feet increased to 5,000 sq.ft. The Opthalmologist Office originally Dlanned for 6,000 square feet has not changed. P.O. BOX 461, 78 -611 HWY. 111, LA OUINTA, CA 92253 • PH.: 619/773 -2345 • FAX: 619/568 -4567 •`� '-� ,. 1 1. .. Mr. Greg Trousdell January 6, 1992 -2- We also eliminated the bridge between the Medical Office building and Parking Garage to give an unobstructed view of the mountains from Highway 111 as requested by the Planning Commission. We have made adjustments in the Parking Garage by reducing it to two stories above ground and one below. We shall also be showing new renderings that will give you a better perspective of how all this will show the view through the project and the landscaping at eye level. We have reduced the leaseable square footage from our last submission of 165,000(+ or -) square feet to 139,000 (+ or -) square feet-, a reduction in building square footage of 22,000 square feet or 16%. The Parking Garage has been reduced by 33,000 square feet, making a total square footage reduction of 55,000 square feet from out last submission to you. We feel this is a major achievement while still trying to keep this project viable. We hope the Planning Commission will view our continued efforts and cooperation favorably and give us the affirmative vote to proceed with this project. ENCLOSURES 18 Sincerely you #, SiMON PLAZA,,XNC, ilin ead res idef (Prepa d by Fred J. Simon, Sr. in Mr. Pead'-s absence) . i t a `J LIO -k s V C1 1 \ I John F Ken. nedy Memorial Ho spit; October 21, 1991 HAND DELIVERY Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Proposed El Mirador Medical Complex Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital is concerned that the potential impacts of Desert Hospital's proposed expansion into a La Quinta residential neighborhood have not been fully explored and that Desert Hospital has not offered sufficient assurances to guarantee that the proposed expansion will not in the long run result in deterioration of not only the surrounding residential neighborhood, but also the provision of health care services to the eastern Coachella Valley. For these reasons, as more fully elaborated below, we respectfully request that Desert Hospital's application for general plan amendment and zone change be denied. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN OR THE WASHINGTON STREET SPECIFIC PLAN Over the last few years, this Council has worked very hard to develop a well- thought -out, comprehensive, coherent plan for the development of the City that is contained, in part, in the La Quinta General Plan and the Washington Street Specific Plan. The central concept of those plans is a separation of commercial development, which is to be concentrated along the Highway 111 corridor, and residential development, which is planned for the Washington Street corridor. Such a separation of-commercial and 47 -111 Monroe St., Drawer LLLL, Indio, California 92202 -2588 • (619) 347 -6191 A National Medical Enterprises Health Care Center Fully accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 2 residential developments serves the dual purpose of creating a more vital, concentrated commercial development, and protecting residential neighborhoods from traffic, noise, and other disruptive impacts of commercial uses. This Council has been particularly careful to design Washington Street and adjacent land uses to minimize congestion and to ensure unimpeded ingress and egress to the Cove area. Important elements of that plan are to not allow commercial development along Washington Street and to restrict the number of signals. This Council has been firm in denying other developers signalized access to Washington Street that have not fit within the general plan guidelines and the siting of commercial projects too close to the Washington Street corridor. Now, Desert Hospital threatens to compromise the integrity of the General Plan and the Washington Street Specific Plan by siting a large commercial development, with signalized access, on a very conspicuous site in the heart of the Washington Street low- density residential area. Approval of such a project will be a first step in spreading commercial development piecemeal throughout the City, will destroy the continuity of the surrounding residential neighborhood, and will significantly deteriorate the traffic - service characteristics of Washington Street. The traf f is impacts of the proposed project alone require that the project be denied. Washington Street, and especially the Washington Street /Highway 111 intersection, is already subject to considerable congestion. At full build -out, the E1 Mirador project envisions approximately 1,000 employees who will contribute substantial additional traffic to Washington Street and other arterials that are designed to primarily accommodate traffic generated by residential uses. Patients and their families, parents bringing children to the child care facility, and delivery trucks, can all be expected to generate considerable additional traffic. It can also be expected that the facility will generate considerable traffic at night due to shift changes and visitors. Such additional night traffic is not desirable in a residential neighborhood. Concerns regarding traffic are highlighted by the problem of access to the site. The project, as approved by the Planning Commission, calls for a signalized access directly onto Washington Street. The planning staff had originally opposed direct access as it does not comply with general plan guidelines regarding signalization along Washington Street. Instead, staff proposed access via an extension of Washington Street frontage road. The frontage road access was incorporated into the staff's proposed mitigation measures and presumedly served as a basis for staff's City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 3 finding that the project would not result- in significant unmitigated traffic impacts. Now that the Planning Commission has changed the project to include direct access to Washington Street, the conclusion that there will be no significant impacts is called into question. Staff reports that quarter mile spacing of signals will require that the posted speed limit be reduced from 45 miles per hour to 35 miles per hour. Such a reduction will slow traffic and exacerbate congestion. The traffic study itself has undergone several revisions and the final report has become available for review only within the last few days. Effective public review of the traffic study has therefore not been possible. THE POTENTIAL OF HELICOPTER OVERFLIGHTS HAS NOT BEEN SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED The E1 Mirador project threatens additional serious impacts on the Washington Street residential area. A primary concern is the possibility of noisy and disruptive helicopter overflights. Despite the recent deletion of the helipad from the proposed project, the issue of the helipad has not been laid to rest. A helipad may still be necessary "if required by state or federal law." To our knowledge, the circumstances under which federal or state law may require a helipad have not been fully explored. Given the highly disruptive impact a helipad would have on the community, at the very least it should be determined what possibility there is that such a requirement would be imposed. By approving the E1 Mirador project, the City may be placing itself in the position of being unable to deny or control the use of the helipad in the future. The experience of the City of Palm Springs with Desert Hospital's helipad in that city is instructive in this regard. As you may be aware, the Desert Hospital expansion in Palm Springs includes a heliport. During the public hearing for the Palm Springs expansion, it was repeatedly asserted that the City of Palm Springs was preempted by state and federal law from denying the heliport use, and from mitigating adverse noise impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods by restricting the number, timing or direction of helicopter overflight. The fact is that once a helipad is in place, neither Desert Hospital nor the City will have the ultimate say in regulating its use. city of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 4 THE EL MIRADOR PROJECT THREATENS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS Palm Springs' experience with Desert Hospital is also illustrative regarding the potential long range impacts of such a facility on a residential neighborhood. Ten years ago Desert Hospital was a community hospital that was accommodated on an aesthetically pleasing, campus -like parcel that fit in well with the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Subsequent expansions have extended the hospital far beyond its original boundaries and into the surrounding residential neighborhoods. High density development will consume most of the site's open space. Some residential streets have_ been or will have to be upgraded and signalized to accommodate the additional traffic. Some streets will actually be closed. Helicopter overflights have become a significant source of irritation for the hospital's neighbors. In short, the hospital has pursued an expansion program that has resulted in a complete transformation of a quiet residential neighborhood and generated considerable resentment among its neighbors. There is no guarantee from Desert Hospital that the facility proposed for La Quinta will not generate the same inexorable pressure to expand, especially if the facility has the effect of reducing or eliminating services provided by JFK Memorial Hospital. The City Council should not place the Washington Street residential area in jeopardy of a similar expansion program. Neither the General Plan nor the Washington Street Specific Plan contemplate or accommodate the proposed E1 Mirador project. If the project is approved, other developers, including JFK Memorial Hospital will seek to locate commercial parcels on cheaper residential sites. The question arises as to how the City can refuse other commercial efforts to locate in residential areas once a precedent is set by Desert Hospital. THE EL MIRADOR PROJECT ADDRESSES DESERT HOSPITAL'S NEEDS - - NOT THOSE OF THE LA QUINTA COXXUNITY Unlike the longstanding commitment of John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital to the healthcare needs of La Quinta, Desert Hospital and its affiliate view this expansion as a method to funnel funds back to Desert Hospital from outlying areas and to meet contractual commitments it has to large insurance groups. Desert Hospital's announced strategy for expansion includes contracting with large preferred provider networks and insurance plans such as FHP. Now, having already committed itself to such ventures, Desert Hospital must provide the service required by such large groups to specified geographical locations. In fact, it is our understanding City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 5 that Desert Hospital is contractually obligated to expand its facilities into La Quinta. Of course, Desert Hospital would rather characterize its move as an altruistic desire to provide health care access to the citizens of La Quinta. How much more convincing this would have been if the decision had been made before Desert Hospital had contracted to do so. Unfortunately, health care facility decisions based on the ever shifting economics of reimbursement rates and third party payor pressures are seldom long term commitments. The City Counsel should, therefore, seriously examine whether Desert Hospital is concerned about the ongoing health care needs of La Quinta or whether it will simply abandon the project to accommodate the latest changes in insurance group contracting. THE DESERT HOSPITAL VENTURE IS POTENTIALLY ILLEGAL The E1 Mirador project is structured as a joint venture between affiliates of Desert Hospital and physician investors who will, be in a position to refer patients to the facility. It is common knowledge in the health care industry that arrangements of this type have come under increasing scrutiny by federal regulators as having the. potential to violate Medicare fraud and abuse and anti - kickback statutes. In fact, new regulations were issued on July 29, 1991, to provide eleven "safe harbors" for physician -owned enterprises. Unfortunately, the ownership structure of this project does not fall within any of the safe harbors, thereby exposing physician investors to potentially severe penalties (including fines up to $25,000 and /or imprisonment up to 7 years and exclusion from the Medicare program) and the City of La Quinta to the risks of potential collapse of the venture. Desert Hospital's own offering literature most probably acknowledges this potential risk and anticipates the repurchase of investment units by the participating physicians. Even if the investor physicians are willing to take such risks, however, the City of La Quinta should not, unless Desert Hospital will guarantee continued operation of the facility as represented. THE NATURE AND BENEFITS OF THE EL MIRADOR PROJECT HAVE BEEN MISCHARACTERIZED Desert Hospital has attempted to anesthetize opposition by claiming that the E1 Mirador project is a "tax- supported project" that will provide low -cost health care to the La Quinta community. To the contrary,. the E1 Mirador project will be neither tax supported nor low cost. The E1 Mirador project is a commercial venture by Desert Hospital and limited partner physicians. In a recent article that appeared in the Desert Sun, Peter Bergman, City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 6 Desert Hospital's Chief Financial Officer, is quoted as saying that the E1 Mirador project will provide eastern Coachella Valley residents with access to "the only tax - supported hospital in the area." This statement is misleading. Desert Hospital is supported to a small extent by property taxes paid by the residents of its hospital district, which does not include the City of La Quinta. Use of those tax funds to support operations outside of the hospital district would be inappropriate, if not illegal. In fact, the E1 Mirador project does not rely on tax funds at all. The project is structured to be largely financed by, and produce a profit for, its limited partners. Desert Hospital's contribution to the project is also structured to produce a profit for Desert Hospital. If anything, the project could drain local health care dollars out of the community, in the form of profits paid to limited partners and Desert Hospital in Palm Springs. Desert Hospital has not explained how its E1 Mirador project will offer "low -cost services ". In Palm Springs, notwithstanding that Desert Hospital is operating within its tax supported district, the Hospital charges rates similar to those of JFK and Eisenhower for similar services. Desert Hospital's aggressive expansion project will have to be financed by debt and limited partnership investment, which must be repaid by higher health care cost. THE EL KIRADOR PROJECT MAY KEAN REDUCED AVAILABILITY OF HEALTHCARE FACILITIES FOR THE EASTERN COACHELLA VALLEY As you may be aware, John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, as well as Desert Hospital, Eisenhower Hospital and the healthcare industry generally, has experienced serious financial stress in the last few years. Aggressive attempts by health insurers to cut health costs have resulted in less than expected utilization of hospital facilities, especially acute -care beds. Consequently, there is currently an excess of acute -care capacity in the area. Desert Hospital currently has 350 licensed beds. For the most recent twelve month period, Desert has run a census of about 200 patients per day or an occupancy rate of about 57 %. Even during the "peak" winter months, Desert's highest census during February was 240, or 68% occupancy. On the average, there are 440 patients hospitalized per day in the three Coachella Valley facilities or about a 60% occupancy. JFK, which is the nearest hospital to La Quinta, runs an average of occupancy of 60% on its 130 beds. The entry of Desert Hospital into the eastern Coachella Valley market will exacerbate the problem. It can be expected that. JFK Memorial Hospital will compete with the E1 Mirador project for scarce health care dollars and patients. Percentage utilization of City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 7 facilities will drop further, necessitating that patient charges be increased to finance the debt load. Increased competition for scarce healthcare dollars and patients may have additional deleterious impacts. It is entirely possible that the eastern Coachella Valley cannot support two viable acute -care facilities. If JFK is forced to reduce its services or to fold, residents of La Quinta, Indio, Coachella, Thermal and the eastern Coachella Valley will be left without convenient acute -care facilities. It is likely that Desert Hospital would attempt to fill that gap by expansion of its La Quinta facility, an expansion that the current site cannot accommodate without significant additional intrusion into the surrounding residential neighborhoods. If, to the contrary, the E1 Mirador project proves to be unprofitable and uncompetitive, La Quinta could be left with a "white elephant" in a prime residential area. There would be considerable pressure to convert the facility to some other commercial venture which would be even more inappropriate for the site. Desert Hospital has offered no guarantees that the facility will continue to provide health care services, even if it proves to be unprofitable, or that the City of La Quinta, like the City of Blythe, will not eventually be pressured into contributing substantial amounts from its general fund to prop up a failing health care provider. Desert Hospital has also provided no guarantees that it will be willing or capable of reconverting the site to a residential use. DESERT HOSPITAL'S AGGRESSIVE EXPANSION EFFORTS IN PALM SPRINGS, LA QDINTA AND ELSEWHERE, CALLS INTO QUESTION ITS ECONOMIC VIABILITY Aggressive expansion projects like Desert Hospital is currently pursuing in Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and La Quinta have proved unsuccessful in other California communities. Hospitals have found themselves unable to sustain the burden of excessive financing and have had to divest themselves of subsidiary operations. This process of rapid expansion and collapse places the health care system at risk. Careful study of Coachella Valley health care needs is necessary to prevent a similar occurrence here. Also, contrary to representations made by Desert Hospital, the E1 Mirador project may result in a net tax -base decrease for the City of La Quinta. The land on which the project is to be built is owned by Desert Hospital, a nonprofit corporation that will not pay property taxes. Thus, the City's property tax base will be diminished, not increased, by the E1 Mirador project. Furthermore, the project's projected retail sales of medicines and medical equipment will come largely at the expense of other businesses City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 8 established within the City of La Quinta. There is no guarantee from Desert Hospital that the E1 Mirador project will generate sufficient additional taxes to offset the extra demands the project will place on the City's services. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IS NEEDED We are particularly concerned that the El Mirador project is proposed to be adopted without a comprehensive analysis of the associated impacts that would be provided by an environmental impact report. The California Environmental Quality Act requires that environmental review encompass the overall long -term impact of a project. It also requires that a project be reviewed in its entirety. Thus, the environmental analysis may not split a project into two or more segments. Such splitting or "piecemealing" of the "whole" of a project, results in submerging environmental considerations, each with minimal potential impact on the environment, which cumulatively may have disastrous consequences. Desert Hospital's master plan for the E1 Mirador project includes future phases which will include a 100 acute care bed hospital and 15 to 20 additional beds for post- operative recovery, for a total building build -out of 320,000 square feet. Yet despite this known future use, the initial environmental study identifies the project as a 78,000 square foot out - patient care facility and fails to assess the environmental impacts of the proposed future uses. Such foreseeable uses will impact the environment in the areas of affordable housing, cumulative growth, noise, air quality, public health and employee safety, aesthetics, traffic and public services. The determination that the project's impacts could be mitigated to a level of insignificance was based on an environmental assessment of only phase 1. Of particular concern, as noted above, is the helipad. The initial environmental study does not analyze the probability that a helipad will be required or the extent of the potential impacts if the helipad is eventually required. The growth- inducing aspects of the project should be evaluated with respect to compliance with PM10 mitigation, a problem of particular concern to the Coachella Valley. The environmental analysis lacks supporting data to determine the significance of the project's visual impact, especially the visual impact of future phases. The problem of transportation of hazardous materials (such as liquid oxygen and bio- wastes) has not been addressed. Site review apparently has not been done to determine the presence of Milk Vetch, which is a candidate for federal endangered species listing and is often found in sand dune areas such as the project site. City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 9 Finally, there is no supporting data which would allow the City to make a finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan's housing element. The housing element itself may not comply with planning and zoning law requirements in that it fails to properly identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs and fails to provide an adequate statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives and scheduled programs for preservation, improvement, funding source and development of housing, especially low and very low housing. The housing element's consistency with the overall framework provided by the General Plan has not been established. If a court were to subsequently determined that the housing element is inadequate, not only the E1 Mirador project, but all developmental projects within the City of La Quinta, would be put on hold pending the adoption of an adequate housing element. In sum, the potential impacts of the E1 Mirador project have not been adequately studied and addressed. The City of La Quinta should, indeed is legally required to, fully study and address those impacts before approving this Project, which may have a dramatic long range impact, not only on the residential community within which it is sited, but also on the provision of health care services in the eastern Coachella Valley. The environmental documentation should be redrafted to include analysis of the entire Project. Otherwise, there is no basis to conclude that potential impacts of the Project have been mitigated to levels of insignificance. THE EL MIRADOR PROJECT AND THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE REQUIRED FOR ITS APPROVAL SHOULD BE DENIED For its part, JFK Memorial Hospital has provided acute care facilities to the City of La Quinta and the eastern Coachella Valley for many years. JFK Memorial Hospital has demonstrated its commitment to the citizens of La Quinta by establishing physicians in the City who have provided high quality health care. The community of La Quinta has always been considered as part of our coverage area, and we have highly valued our relationship with the City. Desert Hospital's aggressive expansion, through its E1 Mirador limited partnership, raises serious questions as to its ability to guarantee future operations of the planned facility, as well as questions concerning the impact of the planned facility or an expanded facility on the residential area in which it will locate. City of La Quinta City Council Members October 21, 1991 Page 10 Given the numerous unanswered questions regarding the viablity and impacts of the El Mirador project, we respectfully request that Desert Hospital's application be denied. Very truly yours, JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL '-Pw '[J Barry. olf Chief ExecutiCffi PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 2. nd 3. (76 .11 LY& 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ill 12, 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. , r PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. 1 1 1. • 1 1 1; 1� 1' L I I 1�7 19. r�e,�� v w`� `► (� 20. Ovn /Z - G ZI ry) U"o z.Q PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank. you. Name and Address Phone 6471- 6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 i OL T) iv C?- C IS E-A" /1- 0 W fX-, W� We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 3 . G Cw J-1361-,-1 S3 1-3b Ave (JcZRsco 4 5. 14. 15. 16 17 18 19 20 b-t-% • . . N I . _ - _ - - W We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone ' Ila t 2. 3 . 3 - �SS ��1� !/qLL iF J c . 4 - u .. SC — m lc' 4. 6. Y\c, -3 y 7 7 7. G. 8. 9. 10. re � Oat, & 7l� S 1 X�4)40"Wa "��35(k 12. 33 A- 3 -3v 13 . I �. QM c.c�t °c q -J -3 his 14. e 6� o o� ►'� 5 4 VtA 5r. q --b l 37 15. l '73Y75 14 -O 13 i6. L �� t3o.� ,r4 !t 5� &3 l/, WO)J- 17 . - 18 . 3 8S L 19 . 2 0. n1Ur�, _ ter h _ J3_ -Ave- arrn rez We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 9. 10. 11. 12/ 14. 16 17. 18. 19, 20. C/9 -R/-Z Iq� �7/ r-& — /9 '- ✓,4- nJe-r� o -7 °7 0 56Y -y3 2. e�.aJ1� OVER RIM 6. PAP 7. 6; 0 .i�71T \�r 9. 10. 11. 12/ 14. 16 17. 18. 19, 20. C/9 -R/-Z Iq� �7/ r-& — /9 '- ✓,4- nJe-r� o -7 °7 0 56Y -y3 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address ,, Phon wel lo. G✓ S 2 6 6 t ��. ter. c t S G �t — 36 11. !/I L1U1 � -4,�o _A - 1 z, (hD -- — "( 6 7 7_ 12- l� , - sue'- `7'Fs oQ „� 6'1 13. 6-3 - F 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 VC-t-/'4 S UFZ - Pz U6 t �� We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. '0 ((i Z - Zo"+/2C -`z! J /pile r PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone ---7- Z��O - 1. 10 Ze01� 41 75 Z, a "L21-1, C'P- 2 .. 3.1�1.�nuPl -4A,/IA! -e 4. 5. 6. J_� V' 7. 4AIU i v ` 1 8. " Cam- 5 Z-SS (- 9. 10�' 12. AD 14. 1 ,�Illz H 1 t' . - 1 S _7 IJi 74 3 539 G/I 20. We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Addre s kit R �� Phone �n �- �� sG y��L) 1. 'l VVL� / /�/ �T_� �� -27'S klE MP�T1uF2 2.1 annlSe,(A _)' Vt PnArA yca. nQf LD Q. 3 4 0 r 6 • �f"►�!1 %l c�1jz c�i r�x, ^J JS�r ��r/L /Z l2 �cs f. �u l / �LLn(!t ��1 / Z7��+ 7 1 %�iT ^4 �? Sr, 7,Z r /f Y& iceaf 4R,-K!2 rif/. 8. 10. C�r+1� -tom J �� %. c� &2"1 "kA 11. �n °Gc%r, tJ Vj d� 7 W -5- 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. eA- � (o PETITION. We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1 . JO 3. 4. 5. 10. 11J 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17: 18. 19. 20. Z2- 1. I-'T _/ ��- 7 d/ W �KcfS -rE-K K i ' I . PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed El Mirador Medical Plaza physician office/outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address,\ Phone 3. 5. 71 6. 14c, 7 02, 7 7t;)7 8 7 10. 12. 771 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. . [JAM PETITION o We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake. La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name a d Address on 2 2. 3. 4. A�A 5. >4 2�Z/� 9. 10. 0Q�171- 7 12. ��!Y�' C ! ��/ 41 K/-Z"�; 13 . 2J� u C� u ct � 14.— 15. 16. 17. ✓ _ ��2 T Yo3d ��s:3 M QA.!l #C9G1j We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south'of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone `T 3� • `T 3� PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This Facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone( / 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 .' 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 2 . P Me �/ A- q lo 4. f 5. y- 5 (� 6. cry u -r r 0 7. s . IWJ Sl S 9. 10. W CILI 42 J 7 11 - 12. oz 3 p G 3 Ilk1 vdz 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility AJILmh will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address 1. 2. Phone 3 . cJ E• 'v-- S `?�t� : ( \3 A 6S7�"' S(j'k '3c� 4. A L/F OA)',2Aryz q S&Y- 63 5 3 6• \(i 1lfIR_ IICtn- -O iii\ A110 0, QrYo-i\7 n X'-I.,i -o�C 7. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 1 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. G � j J'F ,�Lf -Sz�l y sb 9/ �t J PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south.of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. I / - /9b ?'�a S._ - (03Z� 53 'dp?S � J 'J3 K2ZS3 2253 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Rb Phone i 2 . 64 194 3. tic . , O W 7Z q g VI-4 �a - 15-(0'f- a 132 ;76- 5. rA (21' Z_ 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. I PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed El Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 2. 5. W 7. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Fail 7 �► I I - i_,W. . . ray a PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address 1. 2. Phone PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quints to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of 5t. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank -you. Name and Address Phone 2. 3 . `i j4s� a L 6? 2 4,, ,�G'� e� SrYe- 5- �e ✓ %e�� f 10. 11. 13. 14 15. 16. 17C. 18. 19. 20. C, \_9�� s$ i. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office / outpatient services.development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. G- ti-(I� 1V- D I� PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name d Address Phone 1. - Vim, �S, ��%` 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. S�( -� u � Xax6- mac - y a,)� 8. I 12 . c D 0. Z f 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in pur growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ill 12. 13 14, 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. f`i�l��lII +i We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1 2 3 4 5 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1. 2. 3. 6 2 Z 7 8 . NL �3 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 M Mirador Medical Plaza p physician office /outpatient services d development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of S St. Francis of Assisi C Church and across from Lake La Quinta i in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide c convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed i in our growing community. Thank you. Name an Address P Phone 1 i l�t� i , l PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in.our growing community. Thank you. Name d A ress Phone 6 9 Y 2. �L �'3 0 7� C•� -��- �`6 �l -.s5a 4. 416 5. dn- 7 . 8. ^� 10. 500,1"a 11. 3.2. 14 . rV (,ec1 /'vt�Zi L L) 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 12a"( We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Nam and Address // ) �J Phone 2. 3._ 4. 4�1 aj mt-� 5. d �92�SS 6. 0 7. -2 - 2 S spy- . 10 . 12. 52 -7gJ c�-/le o S-& I/ ,3�� 13. 14. �Z- - 16. W 111'1h J16' 17. _ • 5i /,/ G — 3 20. �, `� �rir� ,>A^. ,AV 5Z - 0912 VALLa A PC PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone F L &LY 2. 3. S �° r U FW 4. 5 6. 7. UA 8 - 5 o o A ve a o3,,Zy 9 � qty � / - �'G off} ✓�� f c° G4� �✓`7 ��y-C� .3 � 9 10 . � 2 5 G,c� • 2 � 11. 1 �S gzzS_. 12 . � � � r 14 . Ike 15. �D lZ l - 7�, U� A �CR A 16. 19. 20. J E Sc C Kok .. L)i O )- ,3 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address , Phone 2. 3 . 4. ! 'z �i 5. J USN l�lti 6. WA 12FAWK&WA rr 11. -1S�U �. n 12 • r �% t 13. 14 17. 1 ' 20. rMiMm We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quints to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 . ,,,c ,, S "-:� -S' 1 -.. /a// I SFq - /S -/'< 10. 11. 12. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CI We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name 'and Address �� Phone 2 . Vk 3 . `\ 4 5. S 7! 373 6. ./ j) 8. 1 . 17. 18. 19. 20. v 0 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 2 . 4(. 5. 6G 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.. 18. 19. 20._ OR i i ,MWAPF Mir, F., �-fflffffks= FOUROME 7 t - PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed El Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone A err. ) /Az, 7 • WEL�CL� ' • V�. y M.� 12. 13. 14. 15.'' 16. 17.� 18.� 19. 20._� �n 4 -0508 V-70 Z �sy � / n. , -,A A t',X �C' / -�Or PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located o Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and i across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This +, facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare 1 services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you: Name and Address Phone 1.� 9'D 2. 0-Y 4. 5. 6. 5 8 . -qq 360 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. / a 47,1. Coo S_ Z/, ,c--) �`- y9lJs�YI.�i__t A/4 -- 5a 3Sl 2i/S- j/1-D -°b PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name d d d r ; Phone 4. 5. A L A,,, ,�. 53 - Coo A--v t v q 12 .c1 �9 !-� S 3 b v E M n 13. 6;4r 14. 15.E 16. 19. 20. ?90�- 1-11179 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Na 1 2 3 4 5 i 6. , / n 5' S' - q 7. �%t1 -�C 53 - 6,90 A 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. / 6. 7 8 0 / 9 (0. 11 G '" - s c -� ` •� � .� � / `-� / GC' 2-rc � v yr �L.C�� ---� -� 12. , 'So ka-/e 13 15. 16. 51 °� 35- l 1 U 17. 18. 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 3. 4. - r .. • / a� SO i fiV AolLedbo L-4�. C8 1 V 12V ,/ ins / i ;4.17t/A, (L 17' 01.411,1,6-3 6 4-M�-j 18 tU- L ! Rr� 6 •. rndif-- We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Nam 1. 2. 3. VV4 eJW 4. '7LI )'JW'2 , 42A.�LQ 5, �3�f1/ vr�LL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' L V 21 M We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Nam d Address Phone 1 LAI_e-__'� --A) 2. ACV C_� v lef u� 8. 9 . .� - 10. 12. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20. = P1� �S a �- �' 7`fl ��' Va t PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name nd Address / Phone 1 � -�� -✓ � -02 3 2 r 4 . 5. ' 6 6. Q/ 70 8. o o �r�� 64 //,)J,4 9.- lo. 11. � 12 / -12 L _ u 14 ' 14 i T `Ti - % Sao - Z6 Oj 17. 18 • r / I- C� 7l 19. 20. PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address ��g Cam" 2 J Phone 1. 3. — (o 4. 5 . 0 rrt � V — -7 6 41 , 7 c r r S L A 5i -5 s4 5(0 q — � aY a -7 c, --it s �,:i1�a- >,_1:7 11 69 13. 14. 15. 1 1 1 1 2 - Z &Sej Cy ��G3 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Addres Phone 1. CO 4. 5. 6j 7Q 8. 9P 10. 11.. 12.' 13, 14. 15. 16. 17\ 18. 19. 20.1 1 OF .. �► Awl FAR /i�''� � ,NO W41A � .s r0n.v niff—Ams JIM 40, I EA W 1 y07-/� �e3 2W^ 5�?61 • PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed E1 Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 1. - RQ 7 fiiif, i 2. fn, 5- - cut, - 3 5 b /J 4 ., �L �'� CC�� %7 Ccba /kq I j 5. --.. L ^C' of o 7 _ . i ��i.� / / i ✓� i / ✓i. �..� / iii. / RAM MM A J,,// • %�� /a. .._ is r . �= �. �' �� '� /�� _ �L =� - -_ Lei.... �/ - l• 9 PETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed El Mirador Medical Plaza physician office/outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing. community. Thank you. Name and Address Phone 77 oc b/- 67 s- 6. At 19. 20. VAN aW�M - -� • , qV rA I _a WAIMI.M. M I 'W ---- -- • IF �r V 4 RETITION We the undersigned, respectfully petition the City of La Quinta to approve the proposed El Mirador Medical Plaza physician office /outpatient services development, that would be located on Washington Avenue south of St. Francis of Assisi Church and across from Lake La Quinta in La Quinta, California. This facility which will provide convenient, comprehensive healthcare services which are needed in our growing community. Thank you. Nje/ Address Phone . o�o �(r�a�a ✓rgn�a 1/ �� r 4. 5 6. 7, 8, 9. 10, 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 0 C T — 2 1 —9 1 M 0 N 1 5: 1 2 L.cxk a Or- W ---9 o OR Q. 02.'02 Honorable Mayor and City. Council: I/We wish to the proposed General Plan Amendmnt: 91 -037, Zone onmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for orposing these land use issues are: I. There is abundant Goffnerci.al land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissicned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Connurity. Sincerely, .� om. I o�-- � < �C T � p /} _ - Q9�.c,� �Gt�rt -��C� (Name appearing an property rolls (La Quinta property or address (Actual mailing address) FPOM MORGAN WARD RLTP MORGAN WARD, REALTOR [3 LAND -- RANCHES -- RESIDENTIAL --- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES "/v r/ Aee P n_ BOX 688 . LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 • BUS. !619) 564-0060/ RES. (619) 564 -0076 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta,for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, 771f C 6£S ame appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) ITO Smoke 'E74ee 4c� ea., aw, 225 SO. M IC VRIV6 #G; R0. BOX 9020 PALM SPRINGS, CA 92283 (819) 223 -2835 FAX 323 7595 . 4 ! , 9v9�ECT City o4 LaQu i.nt.a ESCROW: P.d.Box 1504 LaQuinta, Ca.92253 HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL: Pteaae . be adv"ed that I hereby pnotut Generc t Ptan Amendement 91-037, Zone Change: 91- 065,Envitorvneatt A ,33eesment: 91 -210, as I Jee.e the City hays -su4is c:eni Zand apptoptiateey zoned .bon the {ac iR i ty p topoaed by De.eett Ho sp tak . The Duty hays enough t,,�a".4'c and o-then, pn.obteu 61 aannee t ion. with .the Wae6ungton Street pupeh tiers 0-6 it t pxe6en.t.ey 6tands . I feet no action dhoutd be taken on -thi.6 p.tcoject untie att the pnopen studio and deteumZnatiou have been made. Re ,6pec wy,�a 8 395 Singing Pa &6 Drive La 2ui ta, Ca.92253. 9TE -G2 OCT 21 '91 16 :27 KESSLER & K.ESSLER Honorable Mayor and City Council: P.2'2 I/We wish to protest the proposed General plan Amendment: 91 -037 Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Cc=.v— ercial land available at other sites in the City of .La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Cammnity. ' Sin ely, n n (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quints property or address) (Actual mailing address) SO 1 d S �rA l b,V�o �GI LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this 'could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your 'serious consideration of these issues. Sinc y, A LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment, 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning-to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property.' 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, d- �Q_ I TAT October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds.. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline w.':iie operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, A�jM� T October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If-it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this-purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas.' I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, . rJ . October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely;_ % c/ October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena' and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project.when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Honorable Mayor & City Council October 21, 1991 City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: General Plan Amendment #91 -037, Zone Change #91 -065 Applicant- Desert Hospital Honorable Mayor & City Council: As a former Planning Commissioner, I am extremely disappointed by what appears to be a direction change regarding Washington Street. In 1984 the Washington Street corridor was studied by Staff, the Community, the Planning Commission and the City Council. After two years and tens of thousands of tax dollars, a Specific Plan was adopted for Washington Street. I realize better than most of our local citizens that Specific Plans are, by design, dynamic. Yet, the premise behind the Washington Street Specific Plan was to move traffic from the Cove & the Village, down Washington St. toward Highway 1 1 1 and Interstate 10, with as little interruption as possible. When Adams Street was closed off, it left Washington Street as our only North -South major arterial, that is within our direct control. (As you know we share Jefferson Street with the City of Indio.) Desert Hospital's project will create a major traffic problem on a Street that is already experiencing traffic problems. As you consider the Desert Hospital project, I urge you to leave Washington Street uncluttered. My final issue with the proposed Desert Hospital project is the site that they have chosen. The conversion of R -1, low density residential will, in my opinion, discourage the use of Commercial land. With abundant Commercially Zoned land available, if the Council approves the proposed zoning, it will be sending the wrong message to potential Commercial Developers. In summary, I am asking the Council to deny the General Plan Amendment and the proposed Zone Change. Sin .rely; u is Moran P.S. I have attached my comments on EA 491 -210. I feel the report is inadequate. 6 •��. �� 4 •4 ....4 •4 4!.4 c :. !! 4 I feel a full EIR should be required on the entire project. In reviewing EA91 -210, I have the following comments and possible changes that need to be made (These comments are taking the whole project into consideration): Item #6 (Noise) b States maybe, should be Yes - helipad and emergency vehicles not addressed. Item #7 (Light & Glare) States maybe, should be Yes. Item # 10 (Risk of Upset) States maybe, should be Yes. Item #13 (Transportation /Circulation) a. States maybe, should be Yes. b. States maybe, should be Yes. c. States maybe, should be Yes. d. States maybe, should be Yes. Item #14 (Public Service) c. "States no should be maybe- Project at buildout will have 1,000 employees, per Peter Bergmann. That many employees will have an impact on the schools. Item #21 (Mandatory Findings of Significance) a. States no, should be maybe. 1) Project has potential to degrade quality of environment (air, noise, light & glare and hazardous waste). 2) Eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre history (archaeological artifacts) See University of California Riverside letter. b. States no, should be maybe. Potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals. States no, should be maybe (air, noise, light & glare and hazardous waste). c. States no, should be yes (air, noise, light & glare and hazardous waste). d. States no, should be yes. DETERMINATION - Should be: I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and a Environmental Impact Report is required. :l QUESTIONS ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES ON INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL. STUDY (STAFF RESPONSE) #8 -Land Use(s), page 028 No discussion of impact on existing commercial property, the vacant 30 acres of R -1 land to the south of this project or impacts on Laguna de la Paz residents. #10-Risk of Upset, page 029 Radiation, disposal of hazardous materials, including but not limited to; needles, blood, human tissue, etc. #I 1- Population, page 029 Helipad will have an impact, as well as additional emergency vehicle noise. # 13- Transportation /Circulation, page 030 Make sure all mitigation measures are in place. #I 8-Aesthetics, page 032 Height of buildings -make sure view of Santa Rosas are protected. #21- Mandatory Findings, page 033 DETERMINATION - Should be: I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and a Environmental Impact Report is required. Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, r , f / "k(j X� (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) .., .. .. ,.. .. _.,. ....,..: h::. �... �_ �.. �:-.,._..., r: J.. uin: .....,.�1..:.iu...�.�•.�- ii�'�e y��._...:..�� lsut!FtT�t ATTENTION LAGUNA DE LA PAZ HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY BALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Laguna De La Paz, I would like to coo on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital prQ]ect on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: I. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely,.. �AYv% ww- Z� lY ATTENTION LAGUNA DE LA PAZ HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL . OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Laguna De La Paz, I would like to coo on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 7 -� 7 , Iz- �- �� Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. since 7' yi'j - (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) ATTENTION LAGUNA DE LA PAZ HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Laguna De La Paz, I would like to coo on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little ,notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such• as this_ could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) �. C (Actual mailing address) t -..► Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Since y, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) �[X(I) V15-rA CrCL-o ��I Qur ,Jr-�q (A qZ2.S3 10 %18/91 09:53 $619 564 3489 6 �6 A Members of the City Council City of La Quinta City Hall 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear City Council Members: SIMON MOT RS 004 a� 04W nI,�� C�(16( 44 , IWET = PONTIAC TC%UCXS October 17, 1991 A couple of days ago l received devastating news regarding Desert Hospita? building -near the Catholic Church on WashinC, Street in the City of La Quinta. The planning Commission has approved, by a vote of 3 to 2, the rezoning of residential property to commercial zoning and approved a General Plan Amendment which permits a- 80,000 square foot office building to be built by Desert Hospital. This decision, subject to City Council. approval, has a most disastrous affect on commercial property values along Washington Street and Highway 111. Prospective buyers and developers of commercial property have had their property values dowrig aded to a serious extent. The decision will allow prospective developers to search for residential or agricultural land zoning and then appeal to the City to have-the property rezoned for commercial use. This move by the Planning Commission affects all commercial property values in the City of La Quinta. The impact has been immediately felt when prospective buyers state that they are no longer interested in looking at commercially zoned property because they can locate residential property which the City has set a criteria that they are willing to rezone for commercial use; thereby invoking a monumental loss for those of us who have purchased commercial property at commercial prices. The commercial property has suffered serious losses by such a decision if approved by the City Council. I strongly urge all members of the City Council to consider the consequences of going along with this decision. I express nay strong opposition to this practice as a landowner of commercial property and as the second largest taxpayer in the City of La Quinta. Respectfully, SIMO; MOTORS, C. f' Fred J. S, on, Sr. "The Home of Pemonal Service" Preside P.O. Box 1461,78-611 Highway 1 11, La Quinta, CaUfomia 92253 (619) 346-2345 October 20, 1991 Mayor Pena & City Council City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Honorable Mayor and City Council: We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land issues are: There are plenty of commercial land sites available in La Quinta for this project. There is so much traffic on Washington Blvd. now we could not handle that much more. Washington is the only main artery into La Quinta. We moved here because it was a quiet area and a heliport and hospital would radically change that condition. I feel 'we would want to move out of the area as there would be a lose of our property value due to this condition. Sincerely, �4 ep John W. and Louise E. Bain Laguna de la Paz 48 -101 Via Hermosa L8 Quinta, CA 92253 Lot 21 MB 144 -076 TR 20052 -1 Kil Z 0 d 7lld 0 0 = Z 0 T 6 'T Z 'O T pa�'ric 41� fe D c� ti ,� a�� " � -'V ;ice �� `1'• *_ *•1 7 OCT \ 1 OCj�1 VFp c�FA� Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1.. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. S" c rel (Name appeariqo)pr;C rty rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) � � �✓�. ;ice � fGt l�• �' /-C -Ud ��r � � I �a c, L-,tc, o9Le lCr l a z 744 Walter and :46ita TreOtger ,Caguna �e �'a Taz 48127 C'alle cSeranas ,Ca Quinta, C9 92253 U&4 1 RFCEl VF d 4et Z' got c>>-y CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) k 40 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this .project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, v C� (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) A Oct F� CZ FRk Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, / It (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RE CE, VEt) OCT 21 1991 CITY CLEPX Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Commmity. Sincerely,��GsIGC/z'D (Name appe ring on p operty rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) exr- RECE1 VL OCT 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I /nIe wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing o property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) Harry A. Bonas 49 -250 Marimba Ct. La Quinta, CA 92253 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) L. 0 RECeT�EQ OCT 7 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in . the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincere `� � is � ✓� � -�:� , �'�- �'�``�.' (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) ki RECEIVED OCT 21 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, GV (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) . Ilk RECEIVED OCT 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Si'ncer;ialy, � r (Name appearing on property rolls) Thomas (La Qui.nta property or address) 46 -365 (Actual.mailing address) Same. F :" Mary Louise Siersma Cameo Palms Drive 0 a .CE1vED OCT Z 11991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Qui.nta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, f (NW6 on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) �,4 RECEIVED OCT 21 Jul CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, C. C" ZA 79925 'wC'w Dr. SCR 92253 (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) aECEIV�° DO21A CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, , (Name appearing on property.roll (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) e. v�c�� l � L C� c EC) C v61 S J,'- RE CE, OCT Z F X991 CrTy CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Comminity. Sincerely, ( appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) _l RECEIVED OCT 21 1901 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) /� -X37 j� `i%�'i�`�,� zpa'�14" Z' /- ?0 '*-Z' -7 -1/ RECEIVED OCT 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City-Council:. wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone �e: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, G (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) R FCEI VF O OOj ? I /91 C /TyetE Ak Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, /�% • Grp /� C (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) CRARLES R. MADISON M -121 Vista Cie10 La Quinta, Ca. 92253 419 -564 -1 RECEIVED OCT 21 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91- 065, Enviroimiental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. The location of.the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. J W c�,: cl 1c• ;.� �� "'� :. C'(A 0 A full EIR needs to be commissioned in orders to assess the true impact of this pro ect on the Community. LL 4+w% < vn C s�v d- JL C +k •, c t �t r c�.0 , c, ' "(s ►^'` �`1i 4-1 {ti Sincerely, OuAjz'(t -e"kUW ry% wV"'f (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) % 71E- 1117a vrc� (a r C�r LUf; RFcFIV� D ocr ciry C�IeF Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, �. (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RL'a C�� QED Oct t > 19st CITY C��RK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) '14e 7 0 e4- �-- RECEDED act 11 i991 CITy CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. 1e Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) a .CE1vED OCRZ110 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/* wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: ✓ 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. N_X 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) 1 D h ' c`" CA V` e Ma Quinta property or address) Gt b $6 S` loco t de, (Actual mailing address) �ui�a� RECEJVEp OCT Y 1 $9, CITY CLEFJK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other . hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, Y&-�ff � --(Name appearing on property rolls) -'(La Quinta property or address) /(Actual mailing address) 6 3 V (_&- S-3 �+0 V C 1 ? 1 io, 1� PtE'lK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sinq ,,erely�/�� (tdame appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) C /7- Honorable Mayor and City Council: RLOCEIVEO I CT 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendn -ent: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Since ely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) lee Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RFc� C /TY X991 c4,Rk Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in .the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) / (La Quinta property or address) 16 (Actual mailing address) Z r3 6 RFc�,V ? > 1sit clr) CLFA k Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely ( appea ng on property rolls) (La Quinta/property or address) (Actual mailing address) act y 10 CITY CLERIC Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) P�SCEIvep 11, 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RLL- C�1 veo OCT 2 1 1991 CITY CLERk Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the. Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) 48226 CALL6 rLC ePU l -AS, c,4 X12253 RECEIVED O G i 21 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerel (Name ap ing on property rolls) aQEG /YIO�� 1�.E'O/�.277E -5 ( La Quinta property or address) �, v /11 �/,oy�cEGS (Actual mailing address) RECEIVED U C I 21 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. sincerel , ( aring on property rolls) (La Quanta property or address) (Actual mailing address) 13411 E�I��f�i►s�. QF� C0PVRD6 J G Ro Ve C 9- (&4 3 1�A`1MaC\)rJ -7. 7&).� -L- RECEIVED OCT 2 t 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual miailing address) RECEIV90 CC Z i 1991 CITY CLER9 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) Ile i-D •r dip �� .�`� 1�A > Ci �`Q��::� � I,p� ' - Gordon r 18582 E Via Bravo Ave Vi,Ua Park CA 92667 RECe VE D Oct 11 1991 CITY C�FR k October 18, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council: We wish to _protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR need's to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, Francis M. Servas /Grace M. Servas 48-101 Vista ielo 1 1 C La Quinta, CA 92253 Mailing Address: 31882 Paseo Labranza San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 PeC' set I l9yj C/2 YC F Rk Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) ( La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RECEIVED 0C1 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely,1�,,Q,� rulg- v (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) ReceI VEo QCT 21 101 C�rY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan N7ex dment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) AI /- I L/ ti 170 -3c.,x I -)erg' L c�pLL/�� Cam, 9 2-03E RECEIVED OCT 111991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely r� (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) FI-4w (Actual mailing address) � -1/ CEO QED ocr 11 1991 CJTy CkeRK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We Irish to protest the proposed General Plan Amend-ment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. cerely, _ MR. & MRS. JOSEPH CALISE (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) 78 -515 Via Melodia LaQuinta, Calif. R6C I VEo Oct 2 1991 CI T y CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, �/G r/i�?.'[', I/ TT1! �i-� (Name appearing on property rolls (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RECEIVED 1 C T 2 1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. . 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the. Community. Sincerel Y - i (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RECEIVF. 15 OCT 21 NI CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sinc rely,�� (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) KEN'Nu -";1 E'C "!JAFD SDRABIAh 75 -;G5 F;EGI -A DNiVE kA QUINTA, Q.ALiFQRNIA 92253 a ec G�� G4ERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. )< The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) y� ?� 19,u4 p/-v l ms )DQ 4,4 Z2,6-3 RECEIVED OCT 2.1 1991 CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: /1Z 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. /----'2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. �3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) RECEDED OCT 21 JM CITY CLERIC Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quints for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or-address) (Actual mailing address) e Xa 3-C r ic R'cCEl QED Oar ? 1 1991 Cl T Y C�ERK Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, Zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Sincerely, Roman K1 mkiewic - (Name appearing o p' rty rolls) (La Quinta pro " or address) (Actual mailing address) Dorothy A. Klimkiewicz PROPEERTY OWNED: 48141 Vista Cielo La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Mailing Address: Royal Carrizo, Box 151 -D Mt. Center, Ca. 92561 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your,serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, T October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, tv `''L; j3 -930 0 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change. 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 10/21/91 07:41 FAX 213 437 6982 COAST RADIOLOGY 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish Chanae:.9 1. 2. 3. Sincerely, .o protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone •065, Environmental Assessment: 91- 210.1, Our reasons for opposing use issues are: There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Conm it�. i L (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quints property or address) (Actual g address) �� AvY� JZ�/Ll °b�.t Imo( �-1 a ct V %5 i-� uyam. . q��3 OCT- 21 -'91 07:56 ID:PALM DESERT POST TEL NO:619- 773 -5400 #864 P01 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We - wish to protest the proposed General plan Amendment:_91-037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Comwnity. �+r1.�0i�. ��ft'��s Il�btr0�►��f.�.K Ib�� fJ�41.��i. -4�C Sincerely, (� A?. (Name appearing on property rolls) [fj gc f� ��. ,pop /"c d) AL. (La Quinta property or address) ��ee (Actual mailing address) �., Qvuut- (2r4. 456W53 SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017;10 -21 -91 ; 9:15AM ; ti 5645617;# 2 A. G, SPANOS CONSTRUCTION, INC, ►448 FRARe RQQ 0 O OW, CA- PORNIA 921 De TELEPHONE Gala 283-3984 October 21. 1991 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: RE: General Plan Amendment 91.037 Zone Change 91-065 Environmental Assessment 91 -210 We believe we have been good corporate citizens of La Quinta. While we are generally reluctant to speak out in opposition to private development, we feel compelled to protest the above referenced actions in this instance. At considerable expense, we pioneered the immediate upgrade of a significant portion of the Washington Street commercial area as part of our Lake La Quinta mixed use project. The major infrastructure improvements came at no small expense nor sacrifice. Given our pioneering investment, we believe it would be inappropriate to radically change the zoning in the area. The success of our commercial property, as well as commercial property along Highway 111, depends on a solid residential base. To remove so much residential in the immediate area is unwise and counter - productive to your general plan goals of a balanced community. Sincerely, Ray Hanes for A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc. Lake La Quinta RH:cam Oct. 21 '91 X3:18 0000 MAGANA CATI CART ET AL Honorable Mayor and City Council: I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Mange: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -2: these land use issues are: TEL213 -785 -9143 PAGE 02 nendment: 91 -037, Zone . Our reasons for opposing 1. There is abundant Commercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be ccm- nissi.oned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Comninity. incerely, (Name appearing on property lls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) ROBERT M. and HELEN B. READY Property Address: Ma illay Address: 48 -241 Calle Floristas La Quinta, CA 92253 571'J r'alibrook Avenue Woodland Hills, CA 91357 -4228 ATTENTION LAGUNA DE LA PAZ HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Laguna De La Paz, I would like to coo on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as describes: in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the,property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, (J 1 J U� �d WE 1 1 r 1 i 11I 3 ATTENTION LAGUNA DE LA PAZ HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Laguna De La Paz, I would like to coo on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Pomona Federal Savings and Loan Association 'Y October 21, 1991 Members of the City Council City of La Quinta City Hall 78 -105 Calle Esstado Yea Quinta, Ca 92253 8ubjeat3 00tober 210 1991 City COUnail Meeting Public Roaring Items #2 & #3 Dear City Council Members: Pomona First Federal (PFF) just become aware of the proposal to thethe establishment of a hospital and related facilities near the Catholic Church on Washington Street in the City of La Quinta. It is PFF's understanding that this will require both a zone change and general plan amendment to change the permitted uses from low density residential to office /medical or such other designation required for a hospital. As the owner of the corner parcel of commercial land at the south- east corner of Hwy 111 and Washington Street, PFF wishes to express its deep concern over the devastating effect this proposal would have on the pro erty values not only for its parcel but for all properties currently zoned for commercial use on Hwy ill and in the Washington Street corridor. When PFF purchased its parcel several years ago, the purchase price already reflected the dedications required on both Hwy 111 and Washington Street which when combined with its key commercial location at the gateway to La Quinta made the property quite valuable. However,. if the current proposal is approved, any party wishing to develop a commercial parcel site on Washington Street need only find some residential property and seek a zone and /or general plan change which will have a very depressing effect on the value of existing commercial property, including PFF's parcel. It also should be noted that with new commercial property develop- ments along Washington Street, instead of low density residential use, this may have the effect of significantly increasing the traffic flow which could_ result in the City seeking additional street widenin on Washington Street at Hwy Ill which likely would come directly Irom PFF's parcel at that corner. This would effec- tively make PFF's -parcel undevelopable and unsaleable at any price. PFF therefore requests that the City Council decline to, approve these two items.. very truly yours, Gilbert F. Smith Senior Vice President GFS:pjs General'Counsel Admin*mdo We": 360 South GOO P. Q tam[ 150 • ib~&, C 0omia 91780 * (714) 623.2323 • (800) 332 -4733 PETER MURRAY AND ASSOCIATES R E A L E S T A T E October 18, 1991 City Council City of La Quinta . P.O.Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: General Plan Amendment and zone change requested by Desert Hospital October 21,1991 City Council Meeting The La Quinta Planning Commission recently approved a general plan amendment and zone change in favor of Desert Hospital for a High Tech Medical Facility named El Mirador. I congratulate the La Quinta Planning Commission for its foresite and its ability to leave petty politics and special interests in the wake of their decision. I have seen renderings of this fine project and consider the acute care facility an opportunity to diversify this community. This state- of- the-art medical facility will provide in excess of 750 jobs. This will be a major employment opportunity for many in this city. Not to mention the boost in economic growth and retail sales from the influx of medical staff and employees from out of the area to be employed by this facility. Members of the city council -.take a look at what industries are currently supporting this community. We cannot survive on golf and art alone. Please support this project. Take this knocking opportunity and run with it. . Sincerely;-- Pe er Murray 78-060 Calle Estado • P.O. Box 5132 • Le Quinta, CA 92253 • (619] 5641165 • FAX: (619) 564 -0369 FROM EQUINART -NORMA Honorable Mayor and City Council: 10.21.1991 9 +50 P. 1 I/We wish to protest the proposed General Plan Amendment: 91 -037, zone Change: 91 -065, Environmental Assessment: 91 -210. Our reasons for opposing these land use issues are: 1. There is abundant Coml ercial land available at other sites in the City of La Quinta for this project. 2. The location of the zone change will increase traffic and other hazards on Washington Street. 3. A full EIR needs to be commissioned in order to assess the true impact of this project on the Community. Si rely, (Name appearing on property rolls) (La Quinta property or address) (Actual mailing address) . LAKENOR- AUTO - SALVAGE TEL No.1 -213- 944 -4687 00 .21,91 9:19 P.01 V tobur 21r 1991 Fax to 619- 564-5bl'1 Attn. : Kerry, City Council Secretary Flom Hcrb Lieberman, Resident 77 -210 Ave. Fernando, La Qunita Ca. subject City Council consideration of The E1 Mirador Med. Plaza Honorable Members of the City Council.; As a resident of the City of La Quinta 1 am pleased to lend my name in support of the establishment of the El Mirador Mcdical Plaza in the City of La Quinta. I feel this complex will be an asset in many ways and wiJJ offer vital services to our community, create jobs for our residents and bring continued respect to the careful development process of our City. I. trust that the City Council along with our Planning Department will establish the reasonable conditions which will insure this project will blend its Style and Decor with the existing beautiful St. Francis of Assisi Church so as to compliment each other as well as future projects that will be created. This will allow the creation of a pleasing effective Con-miunity Service Corridor Entrance to the City of La Quinta. 1 respectfully request tho City Council and fellow residents to Welcome the L1 Mirador Medical Plaza to the City of La.Quinta and Participate in every possible way to insure its success and stable foundation in our city. very Respectfully, Herb ieberman October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it causes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 0 Vtc-TOR[+ A, ��Q I October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. a A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these Issues. Sincerely, L October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amen&w t 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, yt C, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: e The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident. of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility, will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it coupes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it causes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it coupes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. e The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. e A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, ti October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quanta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it canes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these Issues. Sincerely, r October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. Y urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you an October 21, Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �,� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident . I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amen&w t 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear ,Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quanta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quanta 78105 Cane Estado La Quanta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident . f would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project an Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and En virolunen tal Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facallty wall Increase traffic an an already congested Washington Street • A hospital an Washington Street Is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consaderataon of these Issues. Sincerely. October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident . I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91- 210): My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • -The East Coachella valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. a A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it coupes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these Issues. Sincerely October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-065; and Environmental Assessment 91- 210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic an an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these Issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quanta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident . I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: C The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. DThe location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �� M Awl LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendments' 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The _location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. S'_Incerely, c October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, eor f1'/i October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Lear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely,,. October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, S� ?75 &el? ` a � 2-z53 October 18,. 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, " tz� ? 2,2- 5-3 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for.your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, sat /,�zr lu /64 /v Tiff x-14 14 9-12- 7- 1NEZ- qI Z ZS� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members:. As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of�the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 5�- -2is VF,,v/o -A i/�vZ A cA 70' -x-03 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of_ these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Lear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78 -105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned citizen, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: *The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. *The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. *A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, AST LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The _location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 61) 3�� Al LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment-,,91-037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, lJ - l i, d 1/ rt.a q C, cx' t-4., CA, 9 -1- 2 S 3 A qw-P SV LA QUINTA HOMEOWNERS NOTICE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 1991 7:00 PM LA QUINTA CITY HALL OPEN FORUM October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of LaQuinta 78105 Calle Estado LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment/ 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: 1. The City adopted a General Plan designating this property as RESIDENTIAL. I purchased my home under the assumption that the zoning as described in the General Plan would remain intact. I strongly object to the arbitrary zone change of the property. Ample property is appropriately zoned and available for commercial use. I feel it is unfair and poor public policy to amend the existing General Plan, changing RESIDENTIAL zoning to COMMERCIAL zoning, with little notice to or input from the existing residents. 2. A decision such as this could have an adverse financial impact on the surrounding residential property. 3. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested area of Washington Street and bring other unwanted problems to the area. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. S e , �Q Q,u�,,•. Pte.. 9za.5"3 'L� � r \ p October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: A c e 49E,e%c3 SAL As a concerned resident of Ira -eta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: 7U PG 5 t ✓ti v91J`7 As a concerned resident of4,a -Qty , I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members:: As a concerned resident of � eA 'e, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zane Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it canes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: ?AC- e�4 Otis 41,4, r As a concerned resident of Le -Q&ip ay I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, G October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: A e eqj 2�.c5 L�y As a concerned resident of 7 would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. It The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: ^c a43A!v J 046" As a concerned resident of-Le Q I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project areas follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, r --,A October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of u�I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, l� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: C� -E-/t'2' _eat As a concerned resident of.& - Qoirrta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, , October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: 7 ►e- e44 "o U '4� As a concerned resident of ta- Qwlata, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, i October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: rrn e. easy -a y �� c` As a concerned resident of L- -@rre, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quanta 78105 Calle Estado La Quanta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. e A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it canes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - e The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it canes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, -7 y a Manvu.s� 'dF !S J October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Iyu-c"'o ko-OW-1 4-W q � October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, � � o ow October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095;. and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My, reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility, will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, C October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility, will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility, will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City, of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095 and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, � A October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. .The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, / 1 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle EEstado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 =037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sin rely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: Oe sc.-)�- 1,10 .1?1-1471 As a concerned resident of Le-Quinte, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095;. and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members, As a concerned resident of Le Quint I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: �N D As a concerned resident of I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, p October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, A, . L 1 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City, of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095;- and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility, will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Palm Desert, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, '�y October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, ( , 0a�— lJ� 6Zhi� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calla Es tado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pens and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo1.}ows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these _ issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, ( 6m) 3 �p October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project areas follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, &S- MR. 6 MRS. JOHN M. SUMNER 78 -700 Runaway Bay Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (619) 345 -2462 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and City Council Members: As a concerned resident who faces possible annexation to the city of La Quinta, we would like to let you know our concerns regarding the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -201). Not only do we feel that the Coachella Valley has a sufficient number of hospital beds many of which remain unfilled on a daily basis, We are also convinced that this project will not show to the residents of La Quinta that the City Council is concerned with the controls on health care costs. Further the proposed hospital on Washington street is too close to existing residential areas and we feel that the approval of the re- zoning request will establish an unfair precedent and further prove to the residents of La Quinta that the City Council does not value residential land. Please, we ask that you vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21, 1991. Thank you for your consideration of this vital issues. Sincerely, CCJ��oh��nuu M. & Nancy H. Sumner cc: Desert Hospital October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: o The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 9�11d, Dry October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. e The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, V Y/V October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - e The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, v October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident . I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amenolment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. pip , , !01 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local r e s i d e n t. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it coupes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: - • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned local resident. I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. e A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, . 9�mf�'- October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �-P �j October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, J October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo-Y ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge _you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, z a"k October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, —;;t. f mss. � S'�oss G[r�r. October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, s-/- aoa 4 zz�� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident•of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Since rel October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �O` ch October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, L) V" CA October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �3 a , October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calla Es tado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. . * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. # A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. 1 Si c -rely, t _ X77 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as foL}ows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As,a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, LIA,ewl 6e� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will-increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincer y, 2281 1 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo-Y ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Ll / - ? Y 0 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4 ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, G� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quints 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo-Yows: *. The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Si erel October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91- 095;,and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo ;lows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic .on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincepely,, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo-Yows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincere , October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo14ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving- Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues, Sincerely, 'Ar"( 46'1`1�e47 90'� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-095;' and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo ;lows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital-beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �� October 18, 1991 0 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol.4ows The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 2 Zo I MR. i MRS. JOHN M. SUMNER 78 -700 Runaway Bay Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (619) 345 -2462 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and City Council Members: As a concerned resident who faces possible annexation to the city of La Quinta, we would like to let you know our concerns regarding the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -201). Not only do we feel that the Coachella Valley has a sufficient number of hospital beds many of which remain unfilled on a daily basis, We are also convinced that this project will not show to the residents of La Quinta that the City Council is concerned with the controls on health care costs. Further the proposed hospital on Washington street is too close to existing residential areas and we feel that the approval of the re- zoning request will establish an unfair precedent and further prove to the residents of La Quinta that the City Council does not value residential land. Please, we ask that you vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21, 1991. Thank you for your consideration of this vital issues. Sincerely, CJohn M. & Nancy H. Sumner l� - cc: Desert Hospital October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calla Es tado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, r� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4 ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, I October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. $ind rely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91- 095;,and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo ;lows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital- beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, "bones( I \ C- �( Yo CC, �P'J %CLC,,s b<< ( CPS October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in.increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street.. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, 169,X00 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as foL4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 'RD I �trctioCa ��I October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quints 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4 ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -09.5; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will. decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street.. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 0 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calla Es tado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4 ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quints 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of , I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo14 ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project- when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 5 9\449i r-,k,2 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quints 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. ' Sincerely, 6 �v— X33 7/�2i_PhoJj�% /�� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095 ;. and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, G October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quints, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the .proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as foa ;lows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital- beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-095;, and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fa ;lows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital-beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before, . you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 53- a0 1.A quin+6 , C�1,gaa5� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91-210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned prof Ia- Qtdnta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Cs I 1 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: e,�62-� As a concerned I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned re ld—t of ' a ^uln -ta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -065; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210) . My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: • The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. • The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. • A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sinc rely, October 18, 1991 F. The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fol4ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, �tL� October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of La Quinta, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91-095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fa ;lows * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital-beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo14ows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital -beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, 0 October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Coachella,Q& would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (.General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October 21. Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues'. Sincerely, / GHIGV'J 7 4S-497- l w� S i -'mod % # vie wc CIO I-2a 7t/43 M ff c, 4 o October 18, 1991 The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as follows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you to vote against this project when it comes before you on October,21.'- Thank you for your serious consideration of these issues. Sincerely, October 18, 1991 G The Honorable Mayor John Pena and Members of the City Council City of La Quinta 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: As a concerned resident of Indio, I would like to go on record as opposing the proposed Desert Hospital project on Washington Street (General Plan Amendment 91 -037; Zone Change 91 -095; and Environmental Assessment 91 -210). My reasons for opposing this project are as fo-Yows: * The East Coachella Valley has no need for more hospital beds. The percentage of bed occupancy of the three existing hospitals serving Coachella Valley will decline while operating costs increase. This can only result in increased healthcare costs for all valley residents. * It is unclear if this proposed facility will be tax supported. If it is supported by taxes, I am opposed to my taxes being used for this purpose. * The location of the proposed facility will increase traffic on an already congested Washington Street. * A hospital on Washington Street is too close to existing residential areas. I urge you on October issues. Sincerely, t vote against this project 2 Thank you for ur se when it comes before you Ls consideration of these Q, a'�'