Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
0306-416 (OFC)
LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION y ` I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that l am_licensed under -provisions of Chapter.9 (commencing with, Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business'and Professionals Code arid my License is in.full force and effect. ' License # r Lie. Class'• 4 Exp. Date ' f r bate —''7 ? (f' Signature of Contracto -''� I <,. !• OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION J/ I hereby affirm under penalty of :perjury that I am exempt from -the Contractor's ;License Law for the following reason: (, )' ' I,. as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole 'compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for '*sale (Sec. 7044, Business & Professionals Code). - I, as owner'of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business & Professionals -Code). O I am exempt under Section B&P.C. for this reason Date Signature of Owner 'WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ( ) I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of.the work for which this permit is issued. • ( ) I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is.issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier & policy no. are: Carrier .S'1'.A,TE MND', _ - Policy No. 1705019-03 (This section need not be completed if the permit valuation is for $100.00 or less). () I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 -'of the Labor /Code, I shall forthwith comply with,those, provis' ions. , Date:" ss vJf i . Applicant > ii ./ _l.� �,,,a . �-- -Warning: Failure to secure Workers' Compensation coverage is unlawful and shall,subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to $100,000, in -addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney' s; fees. k IMPORTANT Application is hereby made -to the Director of Building and Safety fora permit subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth on his application. 1. Each person upon whose behalf this application is made & each person at whose request and for whose benefit work is performed under or pursuant to any permit issued as a result of this applicaton agrees to, & shall, indemnify - & hold harmless the City of La Quinta,Iits officers, agents and employees. 2.'Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if work is' not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will 'subject permit to cancellation. I certify that I have read this application avid state that the above information is 'correct. I agree to comply with all City, and State laws relating to the building 'construction, and hereby authorize representatives,. of this City to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspection purposes., { Signature (Owner/Agen� % - !!..�? '-13 �{% Date '112A.,11111. BUILDING, PERMIT..,.r4 PERMIOrID64 r DATE ;: VALUATION.. '','57 �r r7 LOT • ' r .PA� TRACT ji � �• � .JOB SITE ' ' ' ` '• y'r ; ADDRESS � F,�;i ie�E17.ea�diu' +� 3 •. 711 OWNER CONTRACTOR / DESIGNER / EN (NEER „N w'• 6 T �z �.i .t ?��,T�C a` r. , cc�z� tr�T169CO, W �_ . PALM � :��t� C A 5 2219 . F1 �:1�}?,�wr . � A+ 32'�"91 ; ' _• -(760)345-2626MIA, -3,989 ��•' t r{A� - 't� USE OF PERMIT - •Ci:7S�t.CJ�. `r+ _ . • � � � . • 0014 A-13,2!;5 3Q.1 %'3HXi,>L' 01,00 2 STORY- OFFICE USP, •I'Y,d3i; YN 'j ; f , aline GEODES. .. . PORCHIPATIO O SP1LdWdCd..R 12,774.00 S A/C --'COMFIRCIAL 11,223.00 S? CONTRACT AMOUNT 49;9914.16 L-3 ';•`15 �"�. � E *p�qq��qq•.�� //'��e/�,(w� /•�(n� //'�^ee//'•TT.,�i�pp ���.gg1��y�**��'•�> ��.+�" 77��'•}} . " 'EhMU ED COST QE' ia•4d'd:M1t�. RUCrf10,N' e1 i"46ul+ntio,l�, .� C;ON97RUCTION IRA 101.000-418.000 $212641so PLAN CHECK VEE 1192-i1�10-fi�?�'31t� $d,763 e12 • �: 1 r E DEPOSIT 101-000-439-318 MECta>ANfIr-Al, ?ZZ iv. -000-421-000 $301.Q0 • ' ' '' ELEr M) CAL FRE ` 101.000«420-000 $227,10 PL -U NIRING Per, 101.000-419-000 $49.50 41°1'13,Ot3t3 MOTION FEE - t:;0I.Afid, 100.000441-000 SUMS Cfi --DIN O FEN 101-000,-423-000 $13.150 DEVELOPER IMPACT nnZ$2�r;319.01 ARX IN PUBLIC fid ACM - COW 270-000-445-000 StI.P�^TOT , CON' AND P'1 014 03132, Pr LF33 Ph -FI -PASS ll:'' ` .0000q 4�UXIVAMIT 1' DUE.?'OW 7 �; ... MAR 2004 CITY OF LA QUINTA FINANCE DEPT RECEIPT �, DATE C! BY' DATE F N ED INSPffiqTOR t . �� INSPECTION RECORD OPERATION DATE INSPECTOR OPERATION DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING APPROVALS MECHANICAL APPROVALS Set Backs Underground Ducts Forms & Footings h Ducts Slab Grade % Return Air Steel Combustion Air Roof Deck Exhaust Fans O.K. to Wrap F.A.U. Framing 3 ZZ wc Compressor Insulation twoew y Vents Fireplace P.L. Grills Fireplace T.O. Fans & Controls Party Wall Insulation Condensate Lines Party Wall Firewall - Exterior Lath Z3 O Drywall - Int. Lath 5- Final Final d BLOCKWALL APPROVALS POOLS - SPAS Steel Set Backs Electric Bond Footings Main Drain Bond Beam Approval to Cover Equipment Location Underground Electric Underground Plbg. Test Final Gas Piping PLUMBING APPROVALS Gas Test Electric Final Waste Lines 2 6 :5T— Heater Final Water Piping Plumbing Final Plumbing Top Out Equipment Enclosure Shower Pans O.K for Finish Plaster Sewer Lateral Pool Cover Sewer Connection 0 Encapsulation Gas Piping Gas Test Appliances Am� Final Final 6 Utility Notice (Gas) ELECTRICAL APPROVALS Temp. Power Pole Underground Conduit Rough Wiring Low Voltage Wiring Fixtures Main Service Sub Panels Exterior Receptacles G.F.I. Smoke Detectors Temp. Use of Power / Final 0 Utility Notice (Perm) COMMENTS: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE J�1Fl�sc Desert Sands Unified School District 47950 Dune Palms Road ¢ BERMUDA DUNES r' Date 3/9/04 La Quinta, CA 92253 rn RANCHO MIRAGE Cf N INDIAN WELLS No. 25587 (760) 771-8515 �`y�P11iNooALM DESERT T y ` ` w' ne La Quinta Developers LLC APN # 643-200-021 A dress 77-900 Avenue of the States Jurisdiction La Quinta. City Palm Desert Zip 92211 Permit # . Tract # 29889 Study Area Type Commercial No. of Units 1 Lot # No. Street S.F. Lot # No. Street ; S.F. Unit 1 47080 Washington 11225 Unit 6 , Unit 2 Unit 7 Unit 3 Unit 8 - Unit 4 Unit 9 Unit 5 Unit 10 Comments 2 story office building At the present time, the Desert Sands Unified School District does not collect fees on garages/carports, covered patios/walkways, residential additions -under 500 square feet, detached accessory structures (spaces that do not contain facilities for living, sleeping, cooking, eating or sanitation) or replacement mobile' homes. It has been determined that the above-named owner is exempt from paying school fees at this time due to the following reason: EXEMPTION -NOT APPLICABLE This certifies that school facility fees imposed pursuant to Education Code Section 17620`and Government Code 65995 Et Seq. in the amount of $0.34X 11,225 S.F. , or $3,816.50 have been paid for the property listed above and that building permits and/or Certificates of Occupancy for this square footage in this proposed project may now be issued. Fees Paid By CC/Palm Desert National Bank -Mike Oliphant Check No. 086535 Name on the check Telephone. 760/275=7742 Funding Commercial By Dr. Doris Wilson Superintendent Fee collected /exempted by Sharon McGily-11 Payment Recd $0.00 $3,816.50 Over/Under, , Signature C NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), this will serve to notify you that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest the fees or other payment identified above will begin to run from the date on which the building or installation permit for this project is issued, or from the date on which those amounts are paid to the District(s) or to another public entity authorized to collect them on the District('s) behalf, whichever is earlier. NOTICE: This Document NOT VALID if Duplicated Embossed Original - Building DepartmenUApplcant Copy - ApplicanUReceipt Copy Accounting 'y OF To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager To CDD: 6-25-2003 From: Oscar Orci, Planning Manager Due date: 7-2-2003 R Status: 1 ST review Building Plans Approval (This is an approval to•issue a.Building Permit) The Community Development Department has reviewed the Building Plans for the following project: Description: 11,225 S.F. 2 story office building Address or general location: 47-110 Washington Street Applicant Contact: Dave Prest 779-5393 The Community Development Department finds that: 0 ...these Building Plans do not require Community Development Department approval. ...these Building Plans are approved by -the Community Development Department. o . ...these Building Plans require corrections. Please forward a copy of the attached corrections to the applicant. When the corrections are made please return them to the Community Development Department for review. Oscar Orci, Planning Manager Date * .. .., � �'—'r_'"e•.s+^tl . gyp: r r `F Building & Safety Department C OF Tt�9 ■ Public Works Release to Issue Building Permit To: John Freeland, Senior Engineer Date to PWD: !v' as- 0 3.* From: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager Permit #: A release from Public Works Department is required prior to building permit . " issuance for the following project: Description: I I , �2 Address or 9eneral location: APN and/or legal description: A Applicant contact and telephone number:.�Q.G<2 779-5393 A. T = -• Please do not return this form to Building & Safety Department until released for building permit issuance. For issues delaying or preventing release, please contact applicant directly at the number above. Note: Action required (reply to Building Department or contact Applicant) within five (5) working days from date received by Public Works Department. To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager From: John Freeland, Senior Engineer t The Public Works Department has reviewed the above project and finds that �& ❑ issuance of this Building Permit does not require Public Works ,rN - Department approval. ...issuance of this Building Permit is approved by the Public Works Department.x Jo- n 'eland, Senio ngineer Date•�• p= t Green Sheet (PW revl ).doc — 4/18/03 " + Av, _* 9 w • z`� _ * '` - .: t ii. •..t .. by `4• STATE _ OF CALIFORNIA •_ Y < <, -DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH. - TEMPORARY ' PERMIT TO OPERATE' AN ELEVATOR a z" (Sections 7300-7M of the Labor Code) r . a -- Elevator-Number .77-76 / Date of Inspection ' Void After Location ql [(6 Cc�uSC � = (Z,�: (-`n Street and. Number (Cjty .or Town Load -Permissible p_S'o i) -_ (�� _ , __ S ! Z 'S� fi P. nn�dss���, }y Persons' Ins ec_to Passenger, Preight, etc. •y ,.Machine Type STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ft , DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ' DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH THIS. TEMPORARY PERMIT. OR COPY MUST BE POSTED IN ELEVATOR CAR , ; %EAT_ulFoaEsyr RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT DEQ F1RE PAOifCT/p 'In cooperation with the 4F California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection _ E�gt9E Cpb 82-675 Highway 111, 2nd FI., Indio, CA 92201 • (760) 863-8886 • Fax (760) 863-7072 F�6E September'24, 2003 `' OEPAlITN1ENT . ,,Tom'Tisdale "Fire Chief To: City of La Quinta Building Department Prmudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside Re: Release for Building Permits ` County and the SDP2003-771 / LQ Professional Plaza, Parcel 6 & 7 Cities of: LAQ-03-BP-046 Banning The Riverside County Fire Department hereby releases the above referenced project for issuance of a building .permit at the discretion of the Building Department., Beaumont Calimesa 4.Respectfully, Canyon Lake Coachella FRANK KAWASAKI 4. Chief Fire Department Planner Desert Hot Springs o• Indian Wells .►//� t Indio By '�• Walter Brandes Lake Elsinore Fire Safety Specialist La Quints i Moreno Valley / Palm Desert 4. Perris Rancho Mirage ❖ San Jacinto Temecula , Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable, District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 • HVEMP MAU Oub ta�PROJECTS1BW&nq PCNSDP2003-771 BP Release.doo Marion Ashley District 5 EMERGENCY SERVICES DIVISION • PLANNING SECTION INDIO OFFICE 82-675 Highway 111, 2^d R., Indio, CA 92201 • (760) 863-8886 • Fax (760) 863-7072 1 54eVAlY4 111:4 ,enazs�r,L,�o�-,a ewau.k�►- g e 40� Z1v,J a `iW°` q ~&&VAr,2, sr 9VA, s�iL 14A[C-4 /R�,v,u ! Jj i� is//�/�y �ONO y �i� i�oG�nD�✓ /� �Q wrtc� �i acts AT'r'1L1A'1'1A) CONS'FRUCTION CO. IN( ...:._ 1, ., I _• 0306-4F6..a" cif=Na►fitber : • , POST ON JOB IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE INSPECTOR MUST SIGN ALL APPLICABLE SPACES -JOB ADDRESS 47-110 WASHINGTON STREET COMM -11,223 SQ.FT. "SHELL" BLDG 2 STORY - OFFICE USE, TYPE VN 2001 CODES TYPE OF INSPECTION DATE INSP. TEMPORARY POWER417i SETBACKS U/G PLUMBING / WASTE Z. O U/G ELECTRICAL/ GROUNDING FOOTINGS / STEEL ,GwN CONCRETE SLAB DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE SIGNED ROOF NAIL/ PRE -ROOF. OKAY TO WRAP FRAMING COMBINATION 1Q ROUGH' ELECTRIC ROUGH PLUMBING ROUGH MECHANICAL INSULATION COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE SIGNED INTERIOR GYP. BD. DRYWALL EXTERIOR LATH S GAS TEST SEPTIC ABANDONMENT SEWER CONNECTION -,2• moi" SBPTICd GREASE INTERCEPTOR / V J MASO RY INSPECTIONS FOOTINGS / STEEL BOND BEAM POOL / SPA / WATER FEATURE INSPECTIO S PRE-GUNITE / SETBACKS U/G PLUMBING U/G GAS U/G ELECTRICAL PRE -PLASTER ALARMS / BARRIERS FINAL INSPECTI NS TEMP. USE OF PERMANENT POWER / s— i ELECTRICAL' PLUMBING . MECHANICAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - U S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. FINAL / JOB COMPLETED ABOVE APPROVALS DO NOT INCLUDE RIGHT TO TURN ON UTILITIES OR OCCUPY BUILDINIG CITY OF"LA QUINTA •5� BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT - 777 -7012 Jr INSPECTION REQUEST LINE. :x i 777-7153 LA: gUINTA DEVELOPERS LLC ner-� s •- acts AT'r'1L1A'1'1A) CONS'FRUCTION CO. IN( ...:._ 1, ., I _• 0306-4F6..a" cif=Na►fitber : • , POST ON JOB IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE INSPECTOR MUST SIGN ALL APPLICABLE SPACES -JOB ADDRESS 47-110 WASHINGTON STREET COMM -11,223 SQ.FT. "SHELL" BLDG 2 STORY - OFFICE USE, TYPE VN 2001 CODES TYPE OF INSPECTION DATE INSP. TEMPORARY POWER417i SETBACKS U/G PLUMBING / WASTE Z. O U/G ELECTRICAL/ GROUNDING FOOTINGS / STEEL ,GwN CONCRETE SLAB DO NOT POUR CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE SIGNED ROOF NAIL/ PRE -ROOF. OKAY TO WRAP FRAMING COMBINATION 1Q ROUGH' ELECTRIC ROUGH PLUMBING ROUGH MECHANICAL INSULATION COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE SIGNED INTERIOR GYP. BD. DRYWALL EXTERIOR LATH S GAS TEST SEPTIC ABANDONMENT SEWER CONNECTION -,2• moi" SBPTICd GREASE INTERCEPTOR / V J MASO RY INSPECTIONS FOOTINGS / STEEL BOND BEAM POOL / SPA / WATER FEATURE INSPECTIO S PRE-GUNITE / SETBACKS U/G PLUMBING U/G GAS U/G ELECTRICAL PRE -PLASTER ALARMS / BARRIERS FINAL INSPECTI NS TEMP. USE OF PERMANENT POWER / s— i ELECTRICAL' PLUMBING . MECHANICAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - U S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. FINAL / JOB COMPLETED ABOVE APPROVALS DO NOT INCLUDE RIGHT TO TURN ON UTILITIES OR OCCUPY BUILDINIG TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED DESCRIPTIONOF•' 1 SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER DATE �D•� i SAMPLED AIR TEMP, STEPPE SLUMP TIME IN MIXER r 4 xy PERMIT NUMBER •.r . - '. TANDY'S , • INSPECTION INC. L0. TYPEOFSTRUCTURE' - CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER . • - - • PO BOX 13766 ARCHITECT PALM DESERT, CA 92255 SPECIAL INSPECTION DAILY: REPORT ' OFFICE/FAX 909.769.9717s ++ PAGER 760.776.3339 GENERAL QON � OR ` • � � y a ;, SUB CONTRACTOR � _! _em�A. v! 1111112ri =#A, • TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED DESCRIPTIONOF•' 1 SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER DATE �D•� i SAMPLED AIR TEMP, STEPPE SLUMP TIME IN MIXER r PHYSICAL ADDRESS - xy PERMIT NUMBER , • ". il L0. TYPEOFSTRUCTURE' - CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER . 4^ ��` ''„ f-`�---'� ARCHITECT Y. ENGINEER . G�� GENERAL QON � OR ` • � � y a ;, SUB CONTRACTOR � _! _em�A. v! 1111112ri =#A, • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATKNJS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. r . CC: x .s + INSPEC ORS SIGNATU INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER DESCRIPTIONOF•' 1 SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER' SAMPLED AIR TEMP, STEPPE SLUMP TIME IN MIXER r LOCATION , • _ ol PROCESS WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER . ��j���1ats�1�►17� • MM` �. _! _em�A. v! 1111112ri =#A, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATKNJS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. r . CC: x .s + INSPEC ORS SIGNATU INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER SAMPLE INFORMATION SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBER' SAMPLED AIR TEMP, STEPPE SLUMP TIME IN MIXER r LOCATION WELDING INFORMATION PROCESS WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATKNJS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. r . CC: x .s + INSPEC ORS SIGNATU INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER ' '�.. t '� r' }. • t r FVI , t . _ i 9 ! Est. t�,� p #� Ys*ri iip i.• 1 SAMPLED AIR TEMP '�+ i 't t'�... f Y K },��P�t,Aj' {, •�1 .��'.� f :} _ R t t of ARCHITECT ENGINEER 3 ' Xo � v TANDrS SUBCONTRACTOR PROCESS INSPECTION INC: CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER PO BOX 13766 PALM DESERT, CA 92255 CV SPECIAL INSPECTION DAILY REPORT 9:9,717 OF9,7. PAGER 760..776.776. 3339 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED SAMPLE INFORMATION DATE TICKET NUMBER MD( NUMBER SAMPLED AIR TEMP PHYSICAL ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER E TYPE OF STRUCTURE ARCHITECT ENGINEER Pcv-`T- ��J1145 c Xo � v GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION OF •' 1 - • ! ,L i 9 11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS 8 APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. PECTORS SIGNATURE IMSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER SAMPLE INFORMATION SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER MD( NUMBER SAMPLED AIR TEMP AMPLE. SLUMP SMP MP TIME IN MIXER LOCATION WELDING INFORMATION PROCESS WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS 8 APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. PECTORS SIGNATURE IMSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER FM TANDrS ,- INSPECTION INC. PO BOX 13766 PALM DESERT, CA 92255 SPECIAL INSPECTION DAILY REPORT OFFICE/FAX 909.769.9717 PAGER 760.776.3339 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED- CL�POK� DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED SUPPLIER DATE __ /oc/ cc P a �./o PHYSICAL ADDRESS Qc,e��ctTf1- PERMIT NUMBER JOB NAMEP� eP�u-S _ r�•� +-7 ®I.g Qu l �k®. �I - TYPE OF STRUCTURE Carp ARCHTTE c ENGINEER iCL6 . GENERAL CONTRACTOR . fi efj47-CiZ'2 SUB CONTRACTOR , -Ria 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT i HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. CC: INSPECTORS SIG E -ISG lt INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBERSAMPLED AIR TEMP STEPPE SLUMP lV GT/ o ® �, o • G- i,. �' <:�G- -.cc .rd� LOCATION 4 yq- PROCESS WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT i HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. CC: INSPECTORS SIG E -ISG lt INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER SAMPLE INFORMATION SUPPLIER TICKET NUMBER MIX NUMBERSAMPLED AIR TEMP STEPPE SLUMP TIME IN MIXER LOCATION WELDING INFORMATION PROCESS WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT i HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. CC: INSPECTORS SIG E -ISG lt INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER TANOWS INSPECTION INC. PO BOX 13766 PALM DESERT, CA 92255.3766 SPECIAL INSPECTION DAILY REPORT-, OFPA E/FAX-909:769.971.7 �. PAGER=.760.776:3339 r•�.ti DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED 6/14 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ NORTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 6, 12, 13, & 14/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. , 6/18 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 61 9, & 15/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. 6/21 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF THREADED STUDS TO STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 6, 9, & 1 5/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. 6/22,- OBSERVED COMPLETION OF FIELD WELDING OF THREADED STUDS TO STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ NORTH AND SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 6,. 9, & 1 5/S3.6. ' .. DATE TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMEDJ' FIELD WELDING' , EARTH SYSTEMS #1302 _ C.E.T. #365 22 -Jun -04 PHYSICAL ADDRESS RODGERIO CORDOVA PERMIT NUMBER . .. . '.. _ (47,r1Y1.0,W'ASHINGTON.ST.-- LAQUINTA 0306-41*6 JOBNAME - - TYPE OF STRUCTURE PARCELS 6 & 7 @ LA QUINTA PROFESSIONAL PLAZA COMMERCIAL ARCHITECT ENGINEER PREST VUKSIC YOUNG GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUB CONTRACTOR AFFILIATED WHITES STEEL DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED 6/14 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ NORTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 6, 12, 13, & 14/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. , 6/18 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 61 9, & 15/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. 6/21 - OBSERVED FIELD WELDING OF THREADED STUDS TO STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 6, 9, & 1 5/S3.6. WORK IN PROGRESS. 6/22,- OBSERVED COMPLETION OF FIELD WELDING OF THREADED STUDS TO STAIRWAY SECTIONS @ NORTH AND SOUTH END OF BUILDING. REF. DET'S. 1, 6,. 9, & 1 5/S3.6. _�. - WELDING INFORMATION PROCESS S.M.A.W. - E7018 & F.C.A.W.-'E71T-8 S A' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK,V�J 'r UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; AND TO THE BEST OF MV ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK ~: r INSPECTORS SIGNATU TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS 8 APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. ICC 1111326— CC: ' INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER - ' .. WELDERS NAME CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER RODGER ACOSTA , EARTH SYSTEMS #1302 FERNANDO ALMADA C.E.T. #365 CARLOS COSSIO C.E.T. #660 RODGERIO CORDOVA EARTH SYSTEMS #4061 _�. - WELDING INFORMATION PROCESS S.M.A.W. - E7018 & F.C.A.W.-'E71T-8 S A' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK,V�J 'r UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; AND TO THE BEST OF MV ABILITY I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK ~: r INSPECTORS SIGNATU TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS 8 APPLICABLE BUILDING LAWS. ICC 1111326— CC: ' INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER - u INC. _ • t PO BOX 13766 PALM DESERT, CA 92255-3766, SPECIAL.INSPECTION DAILY REPORT,.., OFFICE/FAX=909.769.9717' PAGER -760.776.3339 TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED• - DATE , SHOP WELDING: WELDERS NAME 11—Jun-04 P � � '` .•" PERMIT NUMBER -' ; LA QUINTAL 4711D0SWASHINGTONST' -iQUINT-X- • - _ . _ _EARTH SYSTEMS #ES1275 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK B JOB NAME _ , _ . _ _ _ :-'' a TYPE OF STRUCTURE— PARCELS 6 &'7 @ L'A'QUINTA PROFESSIONAL PL°AZA —COMMERCIAL^• s ARCHITECT • r _. 1 j • ^ y - - -' - ENGINEER + , , - .. ,-PREST-VUKSIC , YOUNG GENERAL CONTRACTOR _ ` r -! �- SUB CONTRACTOR . - ..- — . _ . _ _ AFFILIATED - -- - • --• - .WHITES STEEL a x t.1 a 1 � ' i DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED 6/10&6/11 OBSERVED SHOP WELDING OF TS 4X4X 1 /2 COLUMNS FOR STAIRWAY SECTIONS. _SEE,ATTACHED ....STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP WELDING FABRICATION REPORT. SHOP WELDING COMPLETE— WELDING INFORMATION OMPLETEWELDINGINFORMATION — •'— a _ a 'PROCESS •. , — _, .- — - - S:M.A:W. - E7018 WELDERS NAME - -CERTIFYING AGENCY AND CERTIFICATION NUMBER . '... .. _ ISMAELAYAIA� -• �•• - - • •- •.• -_' ' __ EARTH SYSTEMS#ES4001 - - ELOY CRAVES • - _ . _ _EARTH SYSTEMS #ES1275 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK t UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY 1 HAVE FOUND THIS WORK + INSPECTORS SIGNATU E r CIILDI TO COMPLY,WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPEFICATIONS,& APPLICABLE BUNG { < .. LAWS. _... _,._ a .. , _ _; _'ICC 1111326- _ _ F r _ _ cc: INSPECTORS CERTIFICATION AGENCY AND NUMBER -' .. _ a. - w ti .r a. _ _ . • _ _ —.. .µ w._ r •. •. _.ti+W a . ! _, — _. -. r,r. s f.- . ' I STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP WELDING FABRICATION REPORT Fabricated at: WHITES STEEL IStart Date: 6.10.2004 7.Finish Date: 6.11.2004 Physical Address: 47-110 WASHINGTON ST. — LA QUINTA Job Name: PARCELS 6 & 7 @ LA QUINTA PROFFESIONAL PLAZA Contractor: AFFILIATED Engineer: YOUNG ENGINEERING Architect: PREST-VUKSIC PIECE NUMBER ,11A QTY 4 "' ASTM -9 SHAPE . _ A500 B SIZE—' _ . _ _ _ 4x4x1/2 SINGLE . . PASS IW: CJP NDT WELDING DATE REMARKS • COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY 1 B 3 A500 B 4x4x1/2 A COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY '1 C 1 A500 B 4x4x1/2 Aw COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY . 1 D 2 A500 S 4x4x1/2 AW COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY 1 F 3 A500 B 4x4x1/2 Art, COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY 1 G 4 A500 B 4x4x1/4 AQa COLUMNS - BABE PLATES ONLY 1 H 1 A500 B 4x4x1/4 AW COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY 1 K 2 ASOO B [3 4x4x1/4 COLUMNS - BASE PLATES ONLY All material conforms to the approved Fabricatiors Shop Drawings ACC in SINGLE PASS or CJP WELDING coulumns represents acceptable welding and no corrective work required NDT DATES is date Non -Destructive Testing ( Ultrasonic or Magnetic Particle) was performed 03/16/2005 13:40 7603605719 YOUNG ENGINEERING SE PAGE 02 LNC Is GIN1:L'ZZINS I:.Ri, . ii' ..'Vaiueog�.�om_—.. Od Wl&i th, P06 D9ien, `�.e. 11 P.(�60) F.(780) 36a5T1A --- -- March 16, 2005 Tom Hartung Building Official City of La Quints RE: La OU MW PrOfessionad Playa; Washington and 47�h Ave .La Ouinta CA 92253 Dear Tom, We have performed Structural Observation per C.B.C. section 1702 for the above referenced project and find it to be in General Conformance with the approved City plans and calculations. Please note that this letter does riot relieve the City or the Special Inspectors from determining compliance with the approved plans. If you .have any questions please call. Sincerely, y� Jeffrey B. Young,-S.E. !s 3 F{�. 0 r{TO— LAID SURVEYORS FAX NO. 760 564 0279 Feb. 20 200 �1.'.�!i�I1' ,����,fd,, =���I`�����e��3.,iltII'.�1rl�� , ',ii! �.,'';IiI �'"�;3,� t, }}�,�rFIr�ra�'ll?k�'��I�!�vi�'",,st�t.`+4 '' I�i��I,, r�iit' I I �(I i��I�r�tl�;'•�kk�o„' �I��l ti}I�'tr tik�l�'�',� -��Rt������' `.�3'' f . ,„.'. tt+fu1iI'�rt�ll� ! r'• � �t;> , �I!iIrd'''r�°y'.�r •I.'•, '' t!i ',lY,i�! �. � ':rtII .„ •:rjril1 • ' lI�h r,t:r � '- 2000;:5�i!!4�tiIl'�P+��,M PI'2 PSATELANdSURVEYORS&CVENr�lNEERS. cAlfOu9225318:120 CAIIE Es4Ado, Suim 102� LA Qu 0)560271 (800)3636306. e (7611FAX (760) 564,0279 ,li, '.."��er(���'��!'�°;�������� ; t:'�lE���(( ��,•y�,#''� ., c Ijy"c - S, 1 F, 1�•.;! y �i � ����F_1 1I{� �I1I C yyy , L �' � i '� I�� +�L�it ` �� �r1,;.;'���' it.(' i .�i !I'� '�ew i�l �I • '�I r I il. r Il.�. j ,..r p h� 191�I �I��r !, I � l.�i �'�,�u��)yy ,• t. IIN a 11 ., • ,� �t� 1{,• .I �� r I �•.n ,�< .;� ,,.�'{ ,V� � I. ;li 1 '•t I-, i �lYj. I°', ,;r;�I �!i tl'b i '�?_ N' � rt��fi{'', n ,e if t �, iia. iik r.i February 1 .2604 ,4 Mr. Jesse�'limenez FIA A Q'U'INTA 78x495. Ala; Tampico f' a j1, l' ti` I.atr rata, }California 92260. =rrc ,Ip� �'If "•a� I Kg' : i Ft I ' � its �� t � rI "� Ij. • �:.{ + '� ertification-T LIZ+�innta Professional Plaza' ,F , �,�Gi�' A iib •, 1 11 i A �Nt '. a ''alp , ( I . �.� �� '�. i i 811 irf a I' f ' of Pard' I Map 29889 ' r} j,'„lull' �d ► �'` '' ,�, f ,l 1 I V.,J ci lertif _I Thi lett' . is to tl a field serveywas made of the exis gad in ', the Ci of La' tiint3^ I �t, 1 I tr I ; r ' �W, a i, d9t I iei�lrl�inttatrn i .lti y� l ; iJ rl y I I y a jj ti tl I1 I. I `C,ell 6j' i� I!4't ! ” ,�•��i +N ; '• i1 LoC6' 71 o Parcel Ma 29889 was found to tie in conformance vtnth the approved Grradin� IPlar ' r ;, , i !t e !+ P' .; a � �i Il�+p i i "• .�: ' `C � y r � P I ! fotl�'wrag are the'results �bf our survey: I th n a �, � ,I,. � i ,t, �, ,, I ! I �� • �� , �' 'fir' �, �, I. , •t �t f � i �Z *jy} t : LO " "1 L i PLAN GRADE MEAN ELEVATION `{� i # 6 & 174i r!� 'ri 61.80 61..82 to 4 yr If you have ,any questions, please do not hesitate to call. atr�I', !r t ZIIII ii!! s ►�. t h 'sIn ri,i { ! �,�'' � . � ' ti � �� �i� ��il ���E�t i�iptl' �:�;�' I;I� �h t + �M ' • :� ' � � , .. ' ' t, . ( Ken INuasbcum l' 4r;' j tit �IrRtJwAt � � ! I ��•; j1 , ILS'l 2981 I s' t I tr + � ; '' , i. Prt_:itIll I���I� 1I ijl 1 + I °I�i'�� ' �ly��'• ylyyy� I� I � itr ��: i�l ��! 6 �lj Ili •t.�llt� „' Ily,'�I:P ,i ��' I r�. i:� •gni _� �i, 1, �j��.rlt�����Y` yr. � I i �I. i !I ul , r , , t i;�i ,..�tit, l s !.r NO.8288ja� k `� a t ij� •,I Iyy, 11 � r' 't19 � ii yK . Pit +' 13 ''I ,rl, ' i I' �� 'r v I �' ���•� �� ,�� ll�I, kl TITLE 24 REPORT. . Title 24 Re" port, for: - : La Quinta Professional, Plaza-Parcel 6 & 7 - . 41 Washington St. &fh �. La Quinta, Ca 92253 r. -Project Designer: `'2 f Prest Vuksic Architects ek 72-624 EI Paseo #13-6 Palm Desert, Ca 92260 (760) -779-5393 • t � Report Prepared By: Tim Scott H &e H Air Conditioning t'. t 74=9.91 Joni Drive #20 �w Palm Desert, CA 92260-2043. CITY OF LA QUINT ' (760) 340-3088 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPI. FOR CONSTRUID CTION DATE 3I D BY ' S ` Job Number:, .a # •. .. .,Date: . i fir. t . a a: ' 6112103 ,NThe EnergyPro computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is L, , f�uthorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential 2001 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This program developed by EnergySoft, LLC (415) 883-5900. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft Job Number: + User Number: 5533 :e . G TABLE OFCONTENTS Cover Page Table of Contents 2 Nonresidential Performance Title 24 Forms 3 Form ENV -MM Envelope Mandatory Measures 16 Form LTG -4 Tailored LPD Summary and Worksheet 17 Form LTG -5 Room •Cavity Ratio Worksheet 18 Form LTG -MM Lighting Mandatory Measures 1.19 Form MECH-MM Mechanical Mandatory Measures 20 HVAC System "Heating and Cooling Loads Summary 22 Room Load Summary: 24. • - Room Heating Peak' Loads 26 Room Cooling Peak Loads 28 Room Cooling Coil Loads r 34.. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft Job Number: User Number: 5533 PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Part 1 of 3 PERF -1 OJECT NAME This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 5TG �.c 6/12/03 PROJECT ADDRESS 47040 Washington St. & 47th La Quinta 1 The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building eslgn represented in the construction documents and model) d 15 Building Permit #, PRINCIPACDESIGNER - ENVELOP TELEPHONE Prest Vuksic Architects (760) 779-5393 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR H & H Air Conditioning TELEPHONE (760) 340-3088 Checked by/Date Enforcement Agency Use Run Initiation Time: 06112/03 09:39:12 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:3 0 39 This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, of the State Building Code. This certificate applies only to a Building ysing the performance compliance. approach. UdUMENT-ATION-AUTHOR Tim Scott 5TG �.c DATE 10,928 Sq.Ft. The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building eslgn represented in the construction documents and model) d 15 BUILDING TYPE NONRESIDENTIAL 24, Part 6. HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL ❑ HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM . PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION mechanical engineer, electrical engineer or architect. ADDITION [] ALTERATION F] EXISTING + ADDITION Run Initiation Time: 06112/03 09:39:12 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:3 0 39 This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6, of the State Building Code. This certificate applies only to a Building ysing the performance compliance. approach. UdUMENT-ATION-AUTHOR Tim Scott 5TG �.c DATE Iz- 43 The Principal Designers hereby certify that the proposed building eslgn represented in the construction documents and model) d for this permit application are consistent with all other forms and worksheets, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building as designed meets the energy efficiency requirements of the State Building Code, Title 24, Part 6. ENV. LTG. MECH. F] ❑ 1. 1 hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed as a civil engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer or architect. 2. 1 affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code Section 5537.2 or 6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. ❑ ❑ 3. 1 affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pusuant to Business and Professions Code Sections 5537, 5538, and 6737.1. (These sections of the Business and Professions Code ae printed in full in the Nonresidential Manual.) Indicat tion on plans of Note Block fqr Mandatory Measures Required Forms ENV -1 PRI' PFACENVOPE-DESIGNER - N -AME STGNATUR C. N0. ATE r st Vuksic Architects %A)14sl C G- Z O 109.1,9.011t> LIGH MANCE Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures Required Forms LTG -1 PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER - NAME SIGNATURE LIC. NO. DATE 13-4 Is, 03 MECHANICAL COMPLIANUL Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures M CH -1, MECH-2, MECH-3 Requiredorms MECHANICAL DESIGNER - NAME SIG T E LIC. NO. DATE rRINCIPAL I H & H Air Conditioning s(u � 1, , 1 i 0�_ Run Initiation Time: 06112/03 09:39:12 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:3 0 39 3• ,� _, �, . , �. ... (' � , iERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE, OF COMPLIANCE Part 3 of 3 e local entorcement agency should pay special attention o the items specified in this checklist. ese items require special written- justification n en•justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The local enforcement agency determines _ ~ the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Planj Field • r. f 1 s a. • � Y- y r + F The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written_ justification and documentation for their use have been provided by the applicant. � le3 • .. ..' "f 1. ' ' � - ^, ; - '•,.. • Authorized Signature or Stamp un nitlatlon Time: Un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 -,Job Number..' Page:5 of 39 , ROJECT NAME DATE f La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 &'7 -• 6/12/03, Floor Inst. Port. Ctrl:,': at ore Proc." . Area LPD LPD Credits Loans System Name Zone Name Occupancy Type (sgftJ .(Wlst)1 (W/sf)1 HVAC -1 thru 6 • First Floor Comp Bldg Office 5,464 1.180 0.000 1Vt IV., A, I!" : ` + HVAC -7 thru 12 a Second Floor Comp Bldg Office 5,464 1.180 0.000 • .�y,.• y a. '!.. k•.. Y� Y .. i r SY' i f Notes: 1. See LTG -1 (items marked with asterisk, see LTG -2 by others) 2. See LTG -3 3. See LTG Items above; require,special , r documentation 1� , _4.�-_-,�',? e local entorcement agency should pay special attention o the items specified in this checklist. ese items require special written- justification n en•justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The local enforcement agency determines _ ~ the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Planj Field • r. f 1 s a. • � Y- y r + F The exceptional features listed in this performance approach application have specifically been reviewed. Adequate written_ justification and documentation for their use have been provided by the applicant. � le3 • .. ..' "f 1. ' ' � - ^, ; - '•,.. • Authorized Signature or Stamp un nitlatlon Time: Un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 -,Job Number..' Page:5 of 39 , ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Performance ENV -1 DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 Site Assembled Glazing L necK Dox it tsusioing is - iuu,uuu sqa or L r -m anu--iu,uuu sgrs verucai glazing rrsen rvrr-, , �,eruncauon is requireu. Follow NFRC 100 -SB Procedures and submit NFRC Label Certificate Form. # Type Area U -Fac. Act. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location / Comments 1 Window 32 1.190 0 0.67 # Surface Type Framing Type Act. Area U -Fac. Azm. Tilt Solar Gains y/N Form 3 Reference Location / Comments 1 Wall Wood 374 0.065 0 90 IX I R-19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) First Floor 2 Wall Wood 36 0.065 45 90 X I R-19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) First Floor 3 Wall Wood 793 0.065 90 90 X R-19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16)First Floor Single Metal Tinted a o0 440 6 Window 24 X a xFirst Floor Singe eta inte Wall oo Window 80 X a x .First Floor ing a eta inte a oo 8 Window t1.250 56 a x .First Floor Single Metal Tinted a oo 9 Window 24 X a (W.19.2x6.16) First Floor Single Metal Tinted 00 00Roo 10 Window 80 xSecond Floor Single Metal Tinted a oo 11 Window 24 • .190 X a (W.19.2x6.16) Second Floor Singe Metal TintedFirst a oo 12 Window 24 1.250 X a (W.19.2x6.16) Second Floor 11 Wall oo 13 Window 80 1.190 X a (W.19.2x6.16) Second Floor Single Metal Tinted a oo 14 lWindow, 56 -1.119-0 a x .Second Floor Singe Metal TintedFirst a oo 15 Window 24 1.250 X a (W.19.2x6.16) Second Floor Singe Metal Tintea-First a oo X I (W.19.2x6.16) Second Floor MIT-- oo X a (W.19.2x6.16) econ oor Floor WoodXFloor # Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Hgt. Wd. x .Second Floor Left Fin st. Len. HgE Right Fin Dist. Len. HgF 1 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 2 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 3 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 4 None 0.76 8.0 Ll 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 5 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 6.0 0.1 6.0 6.0 Site Assembled Glazing L necK Dox it tsusioing is - iuu,uuu sqa or L r -m anu--iu,uuu sgrs verucai glazing rrsen rvrr-, , �,eruncauon is requireu. Follow NFRC 100 -SB Procedures and submit NFRC Label Certificate Form. # Type Area U -Fac. Act. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location / Comments 1 Window 32 1.190 0 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor Window. 32 f.190 0 0.67 Singe Metal TintedFirst F oor 3 Window 32 _T.T9_0 0 0.67 Singe Metal Tintedfirst /oor 4 Window 43 1.190 0 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 5 Window 56 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 6 Window 24 90 0.67 Singe eta inte First F oor7 Window 80 90 0.67 ing a eta inte First F oor 8 Window t1.250 56 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 9 Window 24 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted irst Floor 10 Window 80 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted irst F Foor 11 Window 24 • .190 90 0.67 Singe Metal TintedFirst Floor 12 Window 24 1.250 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 13 Window 80 1.190 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 14 lWindow, 56 -1.119-0 90 0.67 Singe Metal TintedFirst Floor 15 Window 24 1.250 90 0.67 Singe Metal Tintea-First Floor # Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Hgt. Wd. Overhang Cen. Hgt. xt. xt.i6 Left Fin st. Len. HgE Right Fin Dist. Len. HgF 1 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 2 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 3 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 4 None 0.76 8.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 5 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 6.0 0.1 6.0 6.0 6 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 ---6-.O--O-.T- 6.0 6.0 7 None 0.76 8.0 0.0 6. 0. 6.0 6.0 8 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 6.0 0. 6.0 6.0 9 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 6.0 0. 6.0 6.0 10 None 0.76 8.0 10.0 6.0 0.1 6.0 6.0 11 None 0.76 8.0 2.8 6.0 0.1 6.0 6.0 12 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 6.0 0.1 6.0 6.0 13 None 0.76 8.0 10.0 6.0 0. 6.0 6.0 14 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 6.0 __0.T_6.0 6.0 15 one 0.76 8.0 .0 6.0 0. 6.0 6.0 7 I I Run Initiation Time: 06/12/03 09:39:2 un Code: 055 35952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:6 of 39 r L_ 4 [ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Performance ENV -1 "ZOJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 0P - .• Solar Gains Tilt Y/N Form 3 Reference Location Comments FEAESTRATIOR SIRFACES eirT-;m a.T.mm:mr rIR7��i[IIIlilI1I11�.iiiii.17_fTirFS[11(1III11R�iiii�laii(�l[1Fi7GT7iTai1►1�:iKK�iift[.�i • r QILU rassemuiea viacu,y U Follow NFRC 100 -SB Procedures and submit NFRC Label Certificate Form. # Type , Area U -Fac. Act. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location / Comments 6 Window 32 1.190 180 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 7 Window 32 1.190 80 0.67 Single Meta Tintedfirst Floor 18 Window 32 1.190 180 0.67 Singe eta inte First Floor 19 Window 43 1.190 225 0.67 Single Metal Tinted irst Floor 20 Window 40 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 21 Window 43 1.190 270 0.67 Singe Metal TintedFirst Floor 22 Window 48 1. 90 270 0.67 Single Metal TintedFirst Floor 23 Window 56 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 24 Window 56 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 25 Window 56 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal TintedFirst Floor 26 Window 56 1.190 270 0.67 Singe Metal TintedFirst Floor 27 Window 56 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 28 Window 48 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 29 Window 43 1.190 315 0.67 Single Metal Tinted First Floor 30 Window 16 1.190 0 0.67 Singe Metal Tintedecon F oor EXTEIRIUK ## Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Hgt. Wd. Len. Overhang Hgt. xt. xt. Left Fin Dist. Len. Hgt. Right Fin Mst. I en. H gt. 16 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 17 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 18 None 0.76 8.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 19 None 0.76 8.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 20 None 0.76 8.0 5.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 21 None 0.76 8.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 22 None 0.76 8.0 6.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 23 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 24 one 0.76 8.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 25 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 26 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 27 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 28 one 0.76 8.0 6.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 . 0 9 None 0.76 8.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 30 None 0.76 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 Run Initiation Time: 06/12/63 09:39:2 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Pagel of 39 4 ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Performance ENV -1 OJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 OPAQUE 5URFACES Solar Surface Framing Act. Gains # Type Type Area U -Fac. Azm. Tilt Y/N Form 3 Reference Location / Comments ALI c^eC KIEMflbox it Wnlcc) o �wa���o� -4 � mi4 MF:Pr I nhal rart fiGFA and 10,1J00 grnt eFnrm9 aZing en e I Ica Ion Is requlrec Site Assembled Glazing n # Type Area U -Fac. Act. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location / Comments 31 Window 16 1.190 0 0.67 Single Metal Tinted Second Floor 32 Window __T_6_1_._1_90 0 0.67 Singe Metal Tinted Second Floor 33 Window 27 1. 90 0 0.67 Singe Metal Tintedecond Floor 34 Window 56 1.190 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 35 Window 24 1.250 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 36 Window 80 1. 90 90 0.67 Singe eta Tintedecond Floor 37 Window 56 90 90 0.67 Single eta Tintedecon Floor 38 Window 24 1.250 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 39 Window 80 1.190 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 40 Window 24 1.190 90 0.67 Singe eta Tintedecon Floor 41 Window 24 .250 90 0.67 Singe eta Tintedecon Floor 42 Window 80 1.190 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 43 Window 80 1.190 90 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 44 Window 56 .190 90 0.67 Singe eta ante econ Floor 45 Window 24 1.250 1 90 0.67 Singe Metal Tinted econd Floor ## Exterior Shade Type SHGC in ow Hgt. Wd. en. Overhang Hgt. LF-xt.RExt. Left Fin Dist. Len. Hgt. Rig7t in Dist. Len. gt. 31 None 0.76 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 32 None 33 None 0.76 0.76 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.4 4.0 2.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 34 None 0.76 8.0 7.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 35 None 0.76 8.0 3.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 36 None 37 None 0.76 0.76 8.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 VF_8.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 38 None 0.76 8.0 3.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 39 one 0.76 8.0 0.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 40 None 0.76 8.0 2.8 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 41 None 0.76 8.0 3.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 42 None 0.76 8.0 10.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 None 0.76 8.0 10.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 •43 44 one 45 None 0.76 0.76 8.0 8.0 7.0 3.0 8.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 0.1 8.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 Run Initiation Time: 06[12/03 09:39:12 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:B of 39 ENVELOPE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Performance ENV -1 �,-,OJECT NAME DATE Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12103 Sola - _ -F La Quinta Professional .. Gains Tilt Y/N Form 3 Reference Location Comments ME Site Assembled GlazingF11.f16GK DUX II DU11UII1y W IVVIVVU synui %,FP%anu'- w,vw aq IL vcnK.ai y104111y LIMII VOIUI R.a IHAI 10 icywicu. Follow NFRC 100 -SB Procedures and submit NFRC Label Certificate Form. # Type Area U -Fac. Act. Azm. SHGC Glazing Type Location / Comments 6 Window 16 1.190 180 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 7 Window 16 1.190 180 0.67 Single eta Tintedecon Floor 48 Window 16 1.190 180 0.67 Single Metal Tintedecon Floor 49 Window 27 1.190 225 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 50 Window 25 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 51 Window 27 1. 90 270 0.67 Single eta rote econ Floor 52 Window 30 1.190 270 0.67 Single Meta Tintedecon Floor 53 Window 35 . 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 54 Window 35 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 55 Window 35 1. 90 270 0.67 Single Meta Tintedecon Floor 56 Window 35 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tintedecond Floor 57 Window 35 1.190 270 0.67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 58 Window j 30 j 1.190 270 0:67 Single Metal Tinted econd Floor 59 Window 1 27 1 1.190 315 0.67 Singe Metal Tinted econ Floor # Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Hgt. Wd. Len. Overhang Hgt. LExt.RExt. Left Fin Dist. Len-.-R-gt. Right Fin Dist. Len. Hgt. 46 None 0.76 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 0 0.1 4.0 0 47 None 0.76 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 0 0.1 4.0 0 48 None 0.76 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 0 0.1 4.0 0 49 None 0.76 5.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 0 0.1 2.0 0 50 None 0.76 5.0 5.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 51 None 0.76 5.0 5. 2.0 0. 2.0 2.0 52 jNone 0.76 1 5.0 6.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 53 one 0.76 5.0 7.0 .0 0. 0 0 54 None 0.76 5.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 55 None 0.76 5.0 7.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 56 None 0.76 5.0 7.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 57 None 0.76 5.0 7.0 4.0 0.1 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 . 58 None 0.76 5.0 6.0 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 59 None 1 0.76 5.0 5.4 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 Run Initiation Time: 06/12/03 09:39:12 Run Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:9 of 39 -IGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY'.Part 1 of 2 LTG -1 4FOJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7, 6/12/03. f LAMPS RAI I ASTC uminaire Code 'LUMINAIRE DESCRIPTION TYPEWatts DESCRIPTION # Per Lamp DESCRIPTION # (Lamp + Ballas Total Watts # Watts (4) 4 ft Fluorescent T8 Elec F32T8 4 32 Electronic 2.0 104 124.0 12,896 f Subtotal from this Page 12,896 , Lighting Schedule on Plans Shows Exterior Lighting , Meets Total 12,896 Portable Lighting (From LTG -1) ❑ Efficacy and Control Requirement of §130(c) I 'Less Control Credit Watts (From LTG -3) Control Requirements of§131(f) Adjusted Actual Watts 12,896 CONTROL LOCATIO (Room # or Dwg. #) CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL' TYPE (Occupant, Daylight, Dimming, etc.) Use UnIv LUMINAIRES CONTROLLED NOTE ,TO ,;FIELD,- ; g a�a xa' � - n - � � r: ;""�; �''-'uN 'c �� ,F '3a.. .t' �d<`G ,.'�' ,j,1 -s r s uw. •o... q,�� ya �47 9�& s��`�a �s � z �y ° n�. •'c�ta ,�-a � .�3 r -; � � � -�' _'� � � -�- � � ' a � � � �� - ��,. x + � � x. ± +��? roM • �v �-. ,$., t�,E ``' »,a rr'e.�.a� w 1.',.rk���,„`t4�r�tca<^�.'?5'�L.�� "�»�s'�`'..a.- s+ix :"fir . �x c� Y�mi �`. ��. y� �s w ���, . a °�'ri f?.4. �z'� �, � � :.i T,�?s � �+�, 3 �.:� . �a�w��•,"'• Run Initiation Time: un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:10'of 39 LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Part 2 of 2 LTG -1 La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 First Floor 5,464 1 5,464 Second Floor 5,464 1 5,464 6/12/03 ❑A ❑B. ❑C ❑D 00DEFAULT OR ZONE ID (W/sqft) AKhA (SF) I[L)TAL WA 115 (B X C) TOTAL 0 0 FA] a ROOM # PORTABLE, LIGHTING OR ZONE ID Description _ # OF FIXT. o LUMIN. WATTS PER FIXTURE TI, aao. TASK # OF TOTAL TOTAL AREA TASK AREA (SF) WATTS (SF) AREAS (D x E) (C x E) ROOM # TOTAL AREA OR ZONE ID (SF) TOTAL 0 Designer needs to provide detailed documentation that the lighting level provided by the overhead lighting meets the needs of the space. The details include luminaire types, CU, and mounting locations relative to work areas. TOTAL AREA (SF) BUILDING SUMMARY (FROM TABLES 1A+1B+1C) BUILDING TOTAL 10,928 (FROM TABLES 1A+1B) 0 Run Initiation Time: un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro Ti By EnergySoft I User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:I I of 39 First Floor 5,464 1 5,464 Second Floor 5,464 1 5,464 TOTAL 10,928 0 ROOM # TOTAL AREA OR ZONE ID (SF) TOTAL 0 Designer needs to provide detailed documentation that the lighting level provided by the overhead lighting meets the needs of the space. The details include luminaire types, CU, and mounting locations relative to work areas. TOTAL AREA (SF) BUILDING SUMMARY (FROM TABLES 1A+1B+1C) BUILDING TOTAL 10,928 (FROM TABLES 1A+1B) 0 Run Initiation Time: un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro Ti By EnergySoft I User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:I I of 39 ]CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - Performance MECH-1 OJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaia-Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 PVSTEffTr MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SYSTEM NAME NOTE TO : r DHW Heater HVAC -1 thru 6 HVAC -7 thru 12 FIELD TIME CONTROL SETBACK CONTROL ISOLATION ZONES HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? ELECTRICHEAT?, FAN CONTROL VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? SIMULTANEOUS HEAT/COOL? HEATING SUPPLY RESET COOLING SUPPLY RESET HEAT REJECTION CONTROL VENTILATION OUTDOOR DAMPER CONTROL ECONOMIZER TYPE DESIGN O.A. CFM (MECH-3, COLUMN I HEATING EQUIPMENT TYPE HEATING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY COOLING EQUIPMENT TYPE COOLING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY MAKE AND MODEL NUMBER PIPE INSULATION REQUIRED? PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED? HEATING DUCT LOCATION R -VALUE COOLING DUCT LOCATIO R -VALUE -ED CEILING/ROOF SPACE n/a n/a n/a • n/a n/a n/a ' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Gas Fired - 78% Standard Gas 50 gal or Le n/a na Yes Yes n/a Na n/a nla n/a Programmable Switch Heating & Cooling Requir n/a Yes 0.0 kW Constant Volume No No Constant Temp . Constant Temp n/a Air Balance Auto No Economizer 820 cfm } Heat Pump 7.70 HSPF s , Split DX . 12.0 SEER / 10.7 EER Yes Yes Ducts in Attic 4.2 Ducts in Attic 4.2 'No Programmable Switch' ,Heating & Cooling Requir n/a Yes 0.0 kW Constant Volume No No Constant Temp , Constant Temp n/a ' Air Balance Auto No Economizer 820 cfm Heat Pump 7.40 HSPF jSplit DX 12.0 SEER / 10.1• EER Yes . . Yes Ducts in Attic 4.2 Ducts in Attic 4.2 No r � a yf- CODE TABLES: Enter code from table below into -columns above. HEAT PUMP THERMOSTAT? TIME CONTROL S: Prog. Switch O: Occupancy Sensor Y:'Yes M: Manual Timer N: No VENTILATION EK it Balance C: Outside Air Cert. M: Out. Air Measure D: Demand Control ? N: Natural 'SETBACK CTRL. ISOLATION ZONES FAN CONTROL ELECTRIC HEAT? H: Heating C: Cooling B: Both Enter Number of Isolation Zones. I: Inlet Vanes P: Variable Pitch? V: VFD O: Other C: Curve VAV MINIMUM POSITION CONTROL? SIMULTANEOUS HEAT / COOL? HEAT AND COOL SUPPLY RESET? OUTDOOR DAMPERECONOMIZER O.A. CFM - HIGH EFFICIENCY? Auto G: Gravity ' it W: Water N:. Not Required EC: Economizer. Control See Section 144(e)3 _ n er Outdoor it CFM. Note: This shall be n less than Col. H on MECH-3. PIPE INSULATION REQUIRED? PIPE/DUCT INSULATION PROTECTED? SEALED DUCTS IN CEILING/ROOF SPACE ; JIVIECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Part 1 of 2 MECH-2 Motor Location ROJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional` Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. CFM Efficiency Tons PU s Constant Volume Equipment Name Equipment Type Qty. Tot. Qty jGPM 100.0% BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. Pump Control CARRIER 5'0GX060 Constant Volume Draw -Through 2,000 0.60 77.0% 100.0% none JUHW BOILER SUMMARY Energy Factor or Recovery Efficiency Standby Loss or Pilot TANK INSOL. System Name System Type Distribution Type Qty Rated Input (Gals.) _ Vol. Ext. R -Val. Standard Gas 50 gal or Less Small Gas Standard 1 40,000 50 0.52 n/a 12 SYSTEM RATINGS EATIN COOLING— System Name System Type Qty. Output Aux. kW Eff. Output Sensible Efficiency Economizer Type CARRIER 38YRA048C31 Split DX 6 48,000 0.0 7.70 HSPF 48,000 36,96012.0 SEER / 10.7 EE No Economizer CARRIER 50GX060 Split DX 6 57,000 0.0 7.40 HSPF 57,500 44,25012.0 SEER / 10.1 EER No Economizer SUPPLY FAN I F—RETURN FAN System Name Fan Type Motor Location CFM BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. CFM BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. CARRIER 38YRA048C31 Constant Volume Blow -Through 1,600 0.50 77.0% 100.0% none CARRIER 5'0GX060 Constant Volume Draw -Through 2,000 0.60 77.0% 100.0% none Run Initiation Time: U6/91/U3 UV:3y:71 Kun GOoe: 'iuoo4s5yaL EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number. 5533 Job Number. Page: 13 of 39 4 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Part 2 of 2 MECH-2. ROJECT NAME La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 DATE 6/12/03 Zone Name System Type Qty. Min. CFM Ratio Reheat Coil CFM I BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. Type Output Type DOM xnA-tl Room Name Qty. CFM BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. Room Name Qty. CFM BHP Motor Eff. Drive Eff. Run InitiationTime: un Code: 1055435952 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number. Page:14 of 39 MECHANICAL VENTILATION MECH-3 La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 a a© a' a s ©' o o a a AREA BASIS COND. AREA (S F) CFM PER SF MIN. CFM (B x C) 5,464 0.15 820 5,464 0.15 820 OCCUPANCY BASIS NO*GFM MIN. OF PER CFM PEOPLE PERSON (ExF) Total Total DESIGN OUTDOOF VAV TRANS. AIR 'MIN. FER CFM ' RATIO AIR 820 820 820 820 C Minimum Ventilation Rate per Section 121, Table 1-F. E Based on Expected Number of Occupants or at least 50% of Chapter 10 1997 UBC Occupant Density. I Must be greater than or equal to H, or use Transfer Air. Design Outdoor Air includes ventilation from Supply Air System & Room Exhaust Fans. K Must be greater than or equal to (H minus 1), and, for VAV, greater than or equal to (H -J). EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number:. Page: 15 of 39 r ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES,, ENV -MM DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7. 6/12/03 t DESCRIPTION' Designer Enforcement �( §118(a) Installed Insulating Material shall have been certified by the manufacturer to comply with the California Quality Standards for insulating material, Title 20, Chapter 4, Article 3. § 118(c) All Insulating Materials shall be installed incompliance with the flame spread rating and smoke density requirements of Sections 2602 and 707,of Title 24, Part 2. ' �( § 117(a) All Exterior Joints and openings in the building that are observable sources of air leakage shall be caulked, gasketed, weatherstripped or otherwise sealed. [XI § 116(b) Site Constructed Doors, Windows and Skylights shall be caulked between the unit and the building, and shall be weatherstripped (except for unframed glass doors and . fire doors), r i § 116(a)1 Manufactured Doors and Windows installed shall have air Infiltration rates not , exceeding those shown in Table Number 1-E. of the Standards. Manufactured fenestration products must be,labeled for U -value according to NFRC procedures. § 118(e) Demising Walls in Nonresidential Buildings: + s The opaque portions of framed demising walls in nonresidential buildings shall have insulation with an installed R -value of no less than R-11 between framing members: f . { • '4 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533. Job Number: Page:16 of:39 FAILORED LPD SUMMARY and. WORKSHEET Part 1 of 3 LTG -4 i La Qui nta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 —7 6/12/03 1. Watts for Illuminance Categories A -D (from column G) 0 watts 2. Watts for Illuminance Categories E -I (from LTG -4 Part 2) Q watts 3. ,Watts for Display Lighting (from LTG -4 Parts 2 & 3) + Q = 0 watts Public Area Display Sales Feature Floor Display Sales Feature Wall Display 4. Total Allowed Watts (lines 1+2+3) > 0 watts QFZ� D"CPD'" FAA] ROOM NAME irk sfs Froo� eco- oor iminance Categories , TASK/ACTIVITY DSS —Sa eTAGE a ROOM CAVITY RATIO 1.09 1.09 a a FLOOR AREA 0 0 a ALLOWED LPD 0.20 0.20 ALLOWED WATTS (E x F) .0 0 PAGE TOTAL - I QI I 01 BUILDING TOTAL 10,92$ SF WATTS EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:17 of 39 ROOM CAVITY RATIO WORKSHEET (RCR>=3.5) • LTG -5 La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 1 6/12/03 Room Name Task/Activity , Description Room, Length (L) Room Width (W) Koorn Cavity Height (H) Room Cay. Ratio SxHX(L+W)- /(LxW) r Room Name Task/Activity Description Room Area (A) Room Perimeter (P) Room Cavity Height (H) Room Cay. Ratio 2.5 x H x P /A LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES.- LTG -MM NAME La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 TE - 6/12/03 Enf DESCRIPTION Designerorcement �( § 131(d)1 For every floor, all interior lighting systems shall be equipped with a separate automatic control to shut off the lighting. This automatic control shall meet the requirements of Section 119 and may be an occupancy sensor, automatic time switch, or other device capable of automatically shutting off the lighting. §.131(d)2 Override for Building Lighting Shut-off: The automatic building shut-off system is provided with a manual, accessible override switch in sight of the lights. The area of override is not to exceed 5,000 square feet.' , �. § 119(h) Automatic Control Devices Certified: All automatic control devices specified are certified; all alternate equipment shall be certified and Installed as directed by the manufacturer. a �( §11 1 Fluorescent Ballast and Luminaires Certified: All fluorescent fixtures specified for the project are certified and listed in the Directory. All installed fixtures shall be certified. z ' § 132 , Tandem Wiring for One and Three Lamp Fluorescent Fixtures: -All one and three lamp fluorescent fixtures are tandem wired with two lamp ballasts where required by Standards Section 132; or all one and three lamp fluorescent fixtures are specified with electronic high -frequency ballasts and are exempt from tandem wiring requirements. r s �( § 131(a) Individual Room/Area Controls: Each room and area in this building is equipped with a separate switch or occupancy sensor device for each area with floor -to -ceiling walls. L"J § 131(b) Uniform Reduction for,lndividual Rooms: All rooms and areas greater than 100 square feet and more than 0.8 watts per square foot of lighting load shall be controlled -with bi-level switching for uniform reduction of lighting within the room: U § 131(c) Daylight Area Control: All rooms with windows and skylights that are greater than 250 square feet and that allow for the effective use of daylight in the area shall have 50% of the lamps in each daylit area controlled by a separate switch; or the effective r use of daylight cannot be accomplished because the windows are continuously - shaded by a building on the adjacent lot. Diagram of shading during different times of the year is included on plans. [, § 131(f) Control of Exterior Lights: Exterior mounted fixtures served from -the electrical panel inside the building are controlled with a directional photocell control on the roof and a corresponding relay in the electrical panel, or uses an astronomical time clock. a§ 131(e) Display Lighting. Display lighting shall be separately switched on circuits that are 20 amps orless. ' § 130(c) Efficacy of Exterior Lights: Exterior mounted fixtures with lamps over 100 Watts served from the electrical panel inside the building have a source efficacy of at least 60 lumens per Watt, or are controlled by a motion sensor. EnergyPro 3.1. By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page: 19 of 39 MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURESPart 1 _f 2 - MECH-MM JECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 1 6/12/03 DESCRIPTION Designer Enforcement Equipment and Systems Efficiencies §111 Any appliance for which there Is a California standard established In the Appliance Efficiency Regulations will comply with the applicable standard. �( § 115(a) Fan type central furnaces shall not have a pilot light. �( § 123 Piping, except that conveying fluids at temperatures between 60 and 105 degrees Fahrenheit, or within HVAC equipment, shall be Insulated In accordance with Standards Section 123. �( §124- Air handling duct systems shall be installed and Insulated In compliance with Sections 601, 603 and 604 of the Uniform Mechanical Code. ' Controls ` § 122(e) Each space conditioning ,system shall be Installed with one of the following: U '§ 122(e),1A Each space conditioning system serving building types such as offices and manufacturing facilities (and all others not explicitly exempt from the requirements of Section 112 (d)) shall be installed with an automatic time switch with an accessible manual override that allows operation of the system during off -hours for up to 4 hours. The time switch shall be capable of programming different schedules for weekdays and weekends; incorporate an automatic holiday "shut- off' feature that turns off all loads for at least 24 hours, then resumes the normally scheduled operation; and has program backup capabilities that prevent the loss of the device's program and time setting for at least 10 hours If power Is Interrupted; or r] § 122(e)1 B An*'occupancy sensor to control the operating period of the system; or § 122(e)1 C A 4 -hour timer that can be manually operated to control the operating period of the ` system. +o ® § 122(e)2 Each space conditioning system shall be Installed with controls that temporarily restart and temporarily operate the system as required to maintain a setback heating and/or a setup cooling thermostat setpoint. f y § 122(g) Each space conditioning system serving multiple zones with a combined conditioned floor area more than 25,000 square feet shall be provided with Isolation zones. Each zone: shall not exceed 25,000 square feet; shall be provided with isolation devices, such as valves or dampers, that allow the supply of heating or. cooling to be setback or shut off independently of other isolation areas; and shall be controlled by a time control device as described above.. , Y 122 a&b Each 9 stem s ace conditioning s shall be controlled b an Individual thermostat § ( ) � P Y Y that responds to temperature within the zone. Where used to control heating, the control shall be adjustable down to 55 degrees F or lower. For cooling, the control shall be adjustable up to 85 degrees F, or higher. Where used for both heating and cooling, the control shall be capable of providing a deadband of at least 5 degrees . F within which the supply of heating and cooling Is shut off or reduced to a minimum. ` [XI 122(c) Thermostats shall have numeric setpoints In degrees Fahrenheit (F) and adjustable r setpoint stops accessible only to authorized personnel. § 112(b) Heat pumps shall be installed with controls to prevent electric resistance supplementary heater operation when the heating load can be met by the heat pump alone. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:20 of 39 _ 1. MECHANICAL MANDATORY MEASURES, Part 2 of 2 MECH-MM E DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -;Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 DescriptionDesigner Enforcement Ventilation § 121(e) Controls shall be provided to allow outside air dampers..or devices to be operated at the ventilation rates as specified on these plans. § 122(f) Gravity or automatic dampers interlocked and closed on fan shutdown shall, be provided on the outside air intakes and discharges of all space conditioning and exhaust systems. , �J § 122(0 All gravity ventilating systems shall be provided with automatic or read! ly.accessible I -J manually operated dampers In all openings to the outside, except for combustion air ' openings. ' § 121(ol Air Balancing: The system shall be balanced in accordance with the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB) Procedural Standards (1983), or Associated Air Balance`Council (AABC) National Standards (1989); or a § 121(f)2 Outside Air Certification: The system shall provide the minimum outside air as shown on the mechanical drawings, and shall be measured and certified by the installing licensed C-20 mechanical contractor and certified by (1) the design mechanical engineer, (2) the installing licenced C-20 mechanical contractor, or (3) the person with overall responsibility for the design of the ventilation system; or § 121(03 Outside Air Measurement: The system shall be equipped with a calibrated local or remote device capable of measuring the quantity of outside air on a continuous j basis and displaying that quantity on a readily accessible display divlce; or 1XIu § 121(04 Another method approved by the Commission. Service Water Heating Systems § 113(b)2 If a circulating hot water system.is installed, it shall have a control capable of ` - automatically turning off the circulating pump(s) when hot water is not required.. , U § 113(b)3B Lavatories in restrooms of public facilities shall be equipped with controls to limit the I outlet temperature to 110 degrees F. § 113(b)3C Lavatories.in restrooms of public facilities shall be equipped with one of the following: M Outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of M gallons per minute. Foot actuated control valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 0.75 gallons per minute. Proximity sensor actuated control valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 0.75 gallons per minute. )' Self-closing valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 2.5 gallons per minute, and 0.25 gallons/cycle (circulating system). Self-closing valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 2.5 gallons per minute, and 0.50 gallons/cycle (non -circulating system). Self-closing valves, and outlet devices that limit the flow of hot water to a maximum of 2.5 gallons per minute and 0.75 gallons/cycle (foot switches and proximity sensor controls). EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft i . User Number: 5533 Job Number. Page:21 of 39 (HVAC SYSTEM HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY I OJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 SYSTEM NAME FLOOR AREA HVAC -1 thru 6 5,464 Number of Systems Heating System Output per System Total Output (Btuh) Output (Btuh/sqft) Cooling'System Output per System Total Output (Btuh) Total Output (Tons) Total Output (Btuh/sgft) Total Output (sgft/Ton) Air System CFM per System Airflow (cfm) Airflow (cfm/sgft) Airflow (cfm/Ton) Outside Air (%) Outside Air (cfm/sgft) Note: values above given at ARI conditions 6 48,000 Total Room Loads Return Vented Lighting Return Air Ducts Return Fan Ventilation Supply Fan Supply Air Ducts TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 288,000 52.7 Latent 48,000 288,000 2a.o 52'7 227.7 COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK CFM ISensiblel Latent CFM Sensible 8,766 160,030 24,10 7,845 114,461 223,028 0 9,600 8,002 5,723 0 0 820 31,564 13,537 820 37,890 8.5 0 0 8,002 5,723 207,797 37,638 163,796 1,600 189,411 l�l CARRIER 38YRA04BC31 223,028 30,584 9,600 1.76 400.0 Total Adjusted System Output 223,028 30,584 (Adjusted for Peak Design Conditions) TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK Jul 4 pm 189,411 8.5 0.15 ,tan 12 am EATING SYSTEM PSYGHRUME I KIDS (Airstream I emperatures at I Ime of Heating I-eaK) 26.0 of 65.7 of 65.7 of 84.3 of Supply Air Ducts Outside Air W�i 820 cfm 83.7 of Supply Fan Heating Coil 9600 cfm ROOMS 70.0 of 69.4 OF _ I Return Air Ducts 11.0 / 77.6 of OutsideA 820 cfm ' 74.8 / 62.7 of 77.9 / 64.1 °F 77.9 / 64.1°F . 56.1 / 55.0 of Supply Fan Cooling Coil 9600 cfm k Return Air Ducts Y Supply Air Ducts 56.8 155.3 of s2.6% R.H. ROOMS 74.0 / 62.4 of EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:22 of 39 1 HVAC SYSTEM HEATING AND COOLING LOADS SUMMARY OJECT NAME DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 SYSTEM NAME FLOOR AREA HVAC -7 thru 12 5,464 Number of Systems Heating System Output per System Total Output (Btuh) Output (Btuh/sgft) Cooling System Output per System Total Output (Btuh) Total Output (Tons) Total Output (Btuh/sgft) Total Output (sgft/Ton) Air System CFM per System Airflow (cfm) Airflow (cfm/sgft) Airflow (cfm/Ton) Outside Air (%) Outside Air (cfm/sgft) Note: values above given at ARI conditions 6 COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK CFM ISensiblel Latent I Sensible 57,000 Total Room Loads 8,82 Return Vented Lighting Return Air Ducts Return Fan Ventilation 820 Supply Fan Supply Air Ducts 154,301 24,10 6,920 .101,900 42,000 0 62.6 7,715 5,095 0 0 57,500 31,728 12,582 820 38,030 45,000 0 0 28.8 7,715 5,095 !M1I I TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 190.1 HVAC EQUIPMENT SELECTION 201,459 36,683 150,120 2,000 2,000 CARRIER 50GX060 257,071 46,654 224,925 2.20 417.4 6.8 Total Adjusted System Output 257,071 46,654 224,925 (Adjusted for Peak Design Conditions) 0.15 TIME OF SYSTEM PEAK Jul 4 pm Jan 12 am HEATING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRICS (Airstream Temperatures at I Ime of cleating reaK) 26.0 of 66.6 of 84.2 of 84.2 of O~ Supply Air Ducts Outside Air 820 cfm'' Heating Coil Supply Fan 83'8 °F 12000 cfm ROOMS 70.0 of 69.6 OF I <—, Return Air Ducts COOLING SYSTEM PSYCHROMETRIGS (Airstream Temperatures at Time of Cooling ea 111.0 / 77.6 of 77.1 ! 64.1 of 57.0 / 55.9 of 57.0 155.9 of aQ� Supply Air Ducts Outside Aire 820 cfm 57.6 / 56.2 of Cooling Coil Supply Fan 12000 cfm 53.9% R.H. ROOMS • 74.6 1610 of 74.0 ! 62.8 of Return Air Ducts ek EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number. Page:23 of 39 ROOM LOAD SUMMARY ,wWROJECT NAME La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 DATE 6/12/03 STEM NAME HVAC -1 thru 6 FLOOR AREA 5,464 IROOM LOAD SUMMARY ROOM COOLING PEAK COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK ZONE NAME ROOM NAME Mult. CFM SENSIBLE LATENT CFM SENSIBLE LATENT CFM SENSIBLE First Floor irs oor 1 8,875 162,031 24,133 8,766 160,030 24,101 7,845 114,461 PAGE TOTAL 8,766 160,030 24,101 7,845 114,461 TOTAL 1 8,766 160,030 24,10111 7,845 114,461 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:i of 39 ROOM LOAD SUMMARY _ DATE La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 FLOOR AREA HVAC-7'thru 12 . 5.464. ROOM LOAD SUMMARY ROOM COOLING PEAK COIL COOLING PEAK COIL HTG. PEAK ZONE NAME ROOM NAME Mult. CFM SENSIBLE LATENT- CFM SENSIBLE LATENT CFM SENSIBLE .Second Floor Second Floor 1 8,821 154,301 24,101 8,821 154,301 24,101 6,920. 101,900 r k Y 5 PAGE TOTAL , 8,821 154,301 24,101 6,920 101,900 TOTAL 8,821 154,301 24,101 6,9201. 101,900 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: Page:25 of 39 ROOM HEATING'PEAK LOADS sect Title Date a Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 Room Information Design Conditions 1 Room Name First Floor Time of Peak' Jan 12 am Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 26 OF Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 70 OF Conduction Area U -Value pT of Btu/hr ' R-19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) 2,432.8 X 0.0655 X 1 44.0 = 7,006 Single Metal Tinted 1,215.2 X x X x X x X x X X X X x x x X x X x x X x x x X x' x X x X X X X X X X x x interior ig 1.1900 X x X X X x x x x x X x X x x X x X x x X X X X X x X X x r X x X X x x X X x another 44.0 _ = = = = = = = = o c _- o _. _ = c = c 63,628 s Single Metal Tinted 96.0 1.2500 44.0 5,280 Slab -On -Grade perimeter 435.0 44.5 19,358- I Items shown with an asterisk (") denote conduction Infiltration. -F_ 1.00 x 1.064 x Schedule Air Sensible Fraction through an 5,464 x rea ��q.00ex surface to 0.50 / 6] t rpgp.Total: oT 95,272 TOTAL HOURLY HEAT LOSS FOR ROOM 114,46111 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 1 Job Number: + Page: 26 of 39 ROOM HEATING PEAK LOADS qoject Title Date a Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 16/12/03 Room Information Design Conditions Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jan 12 am Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 26°F Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 70 OF ;onduction Area X X X x X xX x. x X x X x x xx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x X X x. 9.00 x HeIght U -Value X X - x X x x x X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x X x x x x AT of = = = = _ = = = = _ = = _ = = = = = _ = _ = = = = _ = = = Btu/hr R-38 Roof (R.38.2x14.16) 5,464.0 0.0280. 44.0 R-19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) 2,670.0 0.0655 44.0 7,689 Single Metal Tinted 978.0 1.1900 44.0 51,208 Single Metal Tinted 96.0 1.2500 44.0 5,280 R-19 Floor (F.19.2x8.16) 5,464.0 0.0491 44.0 11,801 r f 1 r • Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior Infiltration: 1.00 x 1.064 x' Sc a ule Air Sensib a Fraction surface to another room. 5,464 x Area Ing 0.50 / 60] ACH Page Total 0 pT 1 82,711 19,189 TOTAL HOURLY HEAT LOSS FOR ROOM 101,900 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Job Number: - Page:27 of 39 r- DOOM COOLING PEAK LOADS olect t meDate La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 5 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature log Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74(� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 77 Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) ingle Metal Tinted Single Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) ingle Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted ,Single Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Area 373.7 472.0 197.7 36.0 793.0 169.5 96.0 280.0 440.0 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value 0.0655 1.1900 1.1900 0.0655 0.0655 1.1900 1.2500 1.1900 0.0655 Orientation Area SGF SC x X x X x x x x x DETD 1 = = = = = = = = = 37.5 23.3 23.3 35.9 36.6 23.3 23.1 23.3 35.7 (North) 32.0 X x X X X X X X x X 40 x x x x x x X X x X 0.746 (North) 32.0 40 0.746 (North) 32.0 40 0.746 (North) 43.3 28 0.746 (East) 56.5 26 0.746 (East) 24.0 26 0.746 (East) 80.0 26 0.746 (East) 56.5 26 0.746 (East) 24.0 26 0.746 (East) 80.0 26 0.746 Page Total Weighting Factor x 0.845 = X 0.845 = X 0.845 = X 1.096 = X 1.776 = x 1.776 = X 1.776 X 1.776 = x 1.776 = x 1.776 = Page Total Btu/hr 917 13,077 5,478 85 1,901 4,696 2,773 7,758 1,027 37,712 . Btu/hr 807 807 807 991 1,946 827 2,756 1,946 827 2,756 14,470 Sched. Weighting Btu/hr Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor fights 1.00 X 5,464 X 1.180 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Waft X 0.999 = 21,985 Occupants � x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/occ. / 10 sgft/OCc. X 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Waft X 1.00 = 0 rocess f 1.001 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Waft x 1.00 = 01 Infiltration: L _ 1_00 x _ 1.064 X 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 / 6� x 38 = 16,572 Schedule X Senstb e rea CellingHeightJJJ Q Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 162,031 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/OCC. / 100 sgft/OCC. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process f 1.00 X 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sqft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 • Infiltration: I 1.00 x L 4771 x 5464 x 9.00 x 0.50 /60� x 0.00396 = 7741 schedule Afr Late t rea a mg Height Qyy Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,133 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 28 of 39 4 ROOM COOLING PEAK LOADS oject Title Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORWATM DMIGN CONDITIONS Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 5 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 109 OF Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 741: Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 77 Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Single Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Area X X X X X X X X X U -Value X X X X X X X X X 55.7 0.0655 728.7 0.0655 96.0 1.1900 5.7 0.0655 26 0.746 (East) 56.5 26 0.746 (East) 24.0 26 0.746 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room.' Solar Gain 3 D4 1 2 3 4 25 1 22 Orientation Area SGF SC (East) 24.5 x x X x x x x X x x 26 x x x x x x x x x x 0.746 (East) 24.0 26 0.746 (East) 80.0 26 0.746 (East) 56.5 26 0.746 (East) 24.0 26 0.746 (South) 32.0 26 0.746 (South) 32.0 26 0.746 (South) 32.0 26 0.746 (Southwest) 43.3 84 0.746 (West) 40.0 220 0.746 DETD 1 48.5 = 57.1 = 23.3 = 51.8 = Page Total Weighting Factor x 1.776 = x 1.776 = x 1.776 = x 1.776 = x 1.776 = x 1.203 = x 1.203 = x 1.203 = x 0.719 = x 0.463 = Page Total Btu/hr 177 2,721 2,660 19 5,577 Btu/hr 827 2,756 1,946 827 746 746 746 1,939 3,032 14,409 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x o:sss = 21,985 Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 ,)Btuh/occ. I 100 sgft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 eceptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess fl o x 5,464 x o.000 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = o Infiltration: L 1.00 x 1.064 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 / 60� x 38 = 16,572 Schedule Air Sensible Area Ceiling Heightp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 162,031 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain ccupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/oCc. / 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Infiltration:1.00 x 4771 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 /6G1 x 0.00396 = 7741 Schedule Aii Laten rea Ceiling HeightpW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,133 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page:29 of 39 ROOM COOLING PEAK LOADS oject TitleDate La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 5 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature log � Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74'� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 77 9: Conduction Area U -Value DETD 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain Orientation Area SGF SC (West) 43.3 X x X X X x x X X x 220 X X x X X x X x x x 0.746 (West) 48.0 221 0.746 (West) 56.0 227 0.746 (West) 56.0 227 0.746 (West) 56.0 227 0.746 (West) 56.0 227 0.746 (West) 56.0 227. 0.746 (West) 48.0 227 0.746 (Northwest) 43.3 181 0.746 Page Total Weighting Factor x 0.462 = X 0.462 = X 0.459 = X 0.459 = X 0.459 X 0.459 = X 0.459 = x 0.459 = X 0.425 = X = Page Total Btu/hr 0 Btu/hr 3,288 3,653 4,351 4,351 4,351 4,351 4,351 3,729 2,488 34,913 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00 X 5,464 X 1.180 Watts/sqft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 0.999 = 21,985 ccupants 0 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. / 10 sgft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 eceptacle 1 u x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: IF" 1_00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x g 9.9 0 x0.50 / 60] xhedule Air Sensible Area edm e Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 162,031 Sched. I Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/OCC. / 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 • Infiltration: 1.00 x 4771 x 5464 X 9.00 x 0.50 /60� x 0.00396 - 7741 Schedule A'iTten Area .1 ng e g pW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,133 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 30 of 39 ROOM COOLING PEAK LOADS ofect Title Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak ,Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 1111: Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 741: Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 Conduction -38 Roof (R.38.2x14.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) ingle Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall •(W.19.2x6.16) Single Metal Tinted Single Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Area 5,464.0 438.0 379.0 36.0 713.0 574.5 96.0 24.5 488.0 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value 0.0280 0.0655 1.1900 0.0655 0.0655 1.1900 '11.2500 1.1900 0.0655 X X X X x X X x X , DETD 1 = = = = = = = = 60.6 37.4 24.5 38.6 39.4 24.5 23.7 24.5 38.5 Orientation Area SGF SC (North) 16.0 x x x X x x x X X X 36 x x X x x x x x x X 0.746 (North) 16.0 36 0.746 (North) 16.0 36 0.746 (North) 27.0 36 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 Page Total Weighting Factor X 0.941 = x 0.941 = x 0.941 = x 0.924 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = Page Total Btu/hr 9,272 1,072 11,055 91 1,841 16,757 2,839 715 1,228 44,868 Btu/hr aoa 404 4041 670 1,946 827 2,756 1,946 827 2,756 12,940 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sqft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.000 22,000 ccupants 01 0 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/oCC. / 10 sqft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 01 0 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 0 rocess IF" 1.00{ x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt�I x 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1_00 x _ 1064 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 160J xhedule A r Sensiti a rea ei ng e g C p Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Btu/hr Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/oCC. / 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sgft X 1 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process f 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Infiltration: I 1.00 x 4,771 x 5464 x 9.00 x 0.50 /s] x 0.00394 = 7,709 schedule Air Lafent Area e I ng eig pW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 31 of 39 ROOM COOLING PEAK LOADS La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION Ur-bit3N CONDITIONS Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 111 9: Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74:� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 9: Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Floor (F.19.2x8.16) Area " U -Value 72.0 901.0 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain 0.0655 0.0655 0.0655 0.0491 Orientation Area SGF SC (East) .24.5 x X x x x X X X X x 35 . X X X X x x X X x X 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35 0.746 (Southwest) 27.0 98 0.746 4 DETD 1 52.9 = 59.1 = 52.6 = 32.41 = Page Total Weighting Factor x 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = x 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 0.981 = X 0.981 = x 0.981 = x 0.558 Page Total Btu/hr 249 3,487 76 8,678 12,491 Btu/hr 844 827 2,756 2,756 1,946 827 410 410 410 1,103 12,287 Sched. Weighting Btu/hr Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor fights 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sgft x 3.41 BtuhlWatt x 1.000 = 22,000 ccupants x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/OCC.• I 10 SgftIOCC. X 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00) x 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess f1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sqft X 3.41 BtuhlWaft�1 X 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: L _ 1_00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 / 661 x ScCeiling38 = 16,572 hedAirule Sensi6 a rea a ng e g J p Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 x[A5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. if 100 sgft/OCc. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x X 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process 1.00 x X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413�1Btuh/Watt = 0 • Infiltration: _ 1.00 x 4,771 x 5464 X 9.00 x 0.50 / 60� x 0.00394 = 7,709 Schedule AirL.ten Area eating Height C JJ pW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 * By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 32 of 39 OM COOLING PEAK LOADS jlllp Ioject Title Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pn Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 1111: Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74c� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 1: Conduction Area 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value Orientation Area SGF SC (West) 25.0 x x x X X x X X X x 204 x x x x x x x x X X 0.746 (West) 27.0 204 0.746 (West) 30.0 141 0.746 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 (West) 35.0 204 0.746 (West) 35.0 204 0.746 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 (West) 30.0 204 0.746 (Northwest) 27.0 133 0.746 Page Total Weighting Factor 0.412 = 0.412 = 0.427 = 0.427 = 0.412 = 0.412 = 0.427 = 0.427 = 0.412 0.435 = Page Total Btu/hr 0 Btu/hr 1,563 1,689 1,350 1,575 2,189 2,189 1,575 1,575 1,876 1,167 16,750 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor. Btu/hr fights 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Wafts/sgft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1:000 = 22,000 ccupants 1 00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. / 10 sgft/occ. X 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x e 9.9 0 x 0.50 / 60 x Q 38 = 16,572 Schedule X Sensible Area et m e Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Btu/hr Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. / 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sgft x 1 3.4131 Btuh/Watt = o Process 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Infiltration: 1 00 x 4,771 x 5464 x �9.00 x 0.50 / 60 x 0.00394 7 709 • —Sch� Ai► Laten eae nC TIf g Re T Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 33 of 39 4 ROOM COOLING COIL LOADS ect Title La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 r Date 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 111 OF Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74c Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Single Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) ingle Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted -19 Wall .(W.19.2x6.16) Area 373.7 472.0 173.2 36.0 793.0 265.5 96.0 304.5 440.0 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value 0.0655 1.1900 1.1900 0.0655 0.0655 1.1900 1.2500 1.1900 0.0655 Orientation Area SGF Sc X X X X x x X x X DETD 1 = = = = = = = = = 37.0 24.3 24.3 38.2 39.1 24.3 23.4 24.3 38.0 (North) 32.0 X X X x X X x X X X 36 X X x X X x x x x x 0.746 (North) 32.0 36 0.746 (North) 32.0 36 0.746 (North) 43.3 36 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) . 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 351 1 0.746 Page Total Weighting Factor x 0.909 = x 0.909 = x 0.909 = x 0.883 = X 1.409 = X 1.409 = x 1.409 = X 1.409 = x 1.409 = x 1.409 = Page Total Btu/hr 905 13,635 5,003 90 2,027 7,670 2,812 8,796 1,094 42,033 Btu/hr 7811 781 781 1,026 2,079 883 2,943 2,079 883 2,943 15,179 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00- x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 0.999 = 21,983 ccupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/OCC. / 10 sgft/occ. X 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1.00 = 0 rocess 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Waft x 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 / 60 x 38 = 16,572 Schedule Air Sensible Area CeilingHeightp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 160,030 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/occ. if 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = o Process r 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 BtuhlWatt = 0 • Infiltration: 1.00 x 4,771 x 5464 x 9.00 x0.50 /6 0� x 0.00394 = 7,709 Schedule Air Latent Area a ng HeightC pW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 34 of 39 ROOM COOLING COIL LOADS F La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 I 6/12/03 Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 111 � Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 7g � Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Area 55.7 X 728.7 X 5.7 X X� X X X X X 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value 0.0655 0.0655 0.0655 Orientation Area SGF SC (East) 24.5 X x x x X x X X X X 35 X X x X x X X x x X 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (South) 32.0 35 0.746 (South) 32.0 35 0.746 (South) 32.0 35 0.746 (Southwest) 43.3 112 0.746 (West) 40.0 226 0.746 DETD 1 52.4 = 58.5 = 52.1 = Page Total Weighting Factor x 1.409 = x 1.409 = x 1.409 = X 1.409 = x 1.409 = X 0.936 = x 0.936 = X 0.936 = X 0.540 = x 0.395 = Page Total Btu/hr 191 2,792 19 3,002 Btu/hr 901 883 2,943 2,079 883 782 782 782 1,945 2,660 14,640 Sched. Weighting Internal'Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00 x 5,464 X 1.180 Wafts/sqft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 0.999 = 21,983 Occupants : 1 '00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/OCC. / 10 sqft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 1 UU x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess 1.00i x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 x 1.064 x 5,464 x 9.00 X 0.50 / 60 x 38 = 16,572 Schedule AiSniblArea Ceiling Reightp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 160,030 Sched. Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Btu/hr ccupants 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. / F 100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Wafts/sgft X 1 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 X _ 4,771 X 5 464 x 9.00 x 0.50 /6 1 X 0.00394 = 7 709 Schedule Air Viten rea a ng e g �W Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 35 of 39 ROOM- COOLING COIL LOADS oject Title . Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM 4 DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name First Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 1111: Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74C� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 1: Conduction Area U -Value DETD 1 Btu/hr 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Page Total Items shown with an asterisk (") denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain Orientation Area X x x x x X X x X x SGF X x x x x x x x x x SC WeightingFactor x x x x X x x x x x = = = = = = = = = I = 20 (West) 43.3 226 0.746 0.396 11 (West) 48.0 226 0.746 0.396 12 (West) 56.0 226 0.746 0.401 13 (West) 56.0 226 0.746 0.401 4 (West) 56.0 226 0.746 0.401 15 (West) 56.0 226 0.746 0.401 16 (West) 56.0 226 0.746 0.401 17 (West) 48.0 226 0.746 0.401 19 (Northwest) 43.3 155 0.746 0.407 . Page -Total Btu/hr 2,883 3,200 3,776 3,776 3,776 3,776 3,776 3,237 2,029 30,228 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights _ 1_001 x 5,464 X 1.180 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 0.999 = 21,983 ccupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/OCC. / 10 sqft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle .x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sqftx 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1,0 = 0 rocess 01 O'x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1,0 = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x �9.00 x 0.50 / 60] x 38 = 16,572 Schedule Air Sensible Areaee nC�li g Height 4 Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 160,030 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants , 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. /F 100 sgft/OCc. =F 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 1 3.4131 BtuhlWatt = o Process 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Infiltration: 1 00 X _ 4,771 X 5464 X 9.00 X 0.50 / 60 x 0.00394 = 7,709 Schedule Air Latent Area celling HeigntQW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 36 of 39 L0 ROOM COOLING. COIL LOADS oject Title La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 1 Date 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 111 Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74c� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 c� Conduction -38 Roof (R.38.204.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Single Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) ingle Metal Tinted ingle Metal Tinted Single Metal Tinted -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) Area 5,464.0 438.0 379.0 36.0 713.0 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value 0.0280 0.0655 1.1900 0.0655 0.0655 1.1900 1.2500 1.1900 0.0655 Orientation Area SGF SC (North) 16.0 X X X X X X X X X x 36 X X X X X X X X X X 0.746 (North) 16.0 36 0.746 (North) 16.0 36 0.746 (North) 27.0 36 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 DETD 1 60.6 = 37.4 = 24.5 = 38.6 = 39.4 = 24.5 23.7 = 24.5 = 38.5 = Page Total Weighting Factor. x 0.941 = x 0.941 = x 0.941 = X 0.924 = X 1.320 = x 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = x 1.320 = x 1.320 = Page Total Btu/hr 9,272 1,072 11,055 91 1,841 16,757 2,839 715 1,228 44,868 Btu/hr 404 404 404 670 1,946 827 2,756 1,946 827 2,756 12,940 Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btu/hr fights 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sqft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.000 = 22,000 ccupants01 0 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/occ. / 10 sgft/occ. X 1.00 = 16,392 eceptacle01 0 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt X- 1.00 = 0 rocess 01 0 x 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sqft X 3.41 Btuh/Watt X 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1.00 x _ 1.064 X 5,464 x 9.00 X 0.50 / 60 x 38 = 16,572 IF"hedule Air Sensible Area CeilingHeightp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 X 5,464 X 300 Btuhlocc. / 100 sgftlocc. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process 1.00 x . 5,464 x 0.000 Wafts/sgft x 3.413�BtuhlVVatt = o • Infiltration:_1.00 x 4,771 x 464 5 x 9.00 x 0.50 /6G1 x 0.00394 = 7709 Schedule AiTtent Area Ceiling HeightpW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number. 5533 Page: 37 of 39 OOM COOLING COIL LOADS ect Title_ Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM AT N -- DESIGN CONDITIONS D Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 pm Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 1111: Indoor DryBulb Temperature 741�: Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 Conduction -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Wall (W.19.2x6.16) -19 Floor (F.1 9.2x8.16) Area X X X X X X X X X U -Value X X X X X X X X I X 72.0 0.0655 901.0 0.0655 22.0 0.0655 5,464.0 0.0491 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain Orientation Area SGF SC (East) 24.5 x X X x x X X x X X 35 x X X X x x X x X X 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 80.0 35 0.746 (East) 56.5 35 0.746 (East) 24.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35 0.746 (South) 16.0 35, 0.746 (Southwest) 27.0 98 0.746 DETD 1 52.9 = 59.1 = 52.6 = 32.4 = Page Total Weighting Factor x 1.320. = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = X 1.320 = x 1.320 = X 0.981 = x 0.981 x 0.981 = x 0.558 Page Total Btu/hr 249 3,487 76 8,678 12,491 Btu/hr 844 827 2,756 2,756 1,946 827 410 410 410 1,103 12,287 Sched. Weighting Btu/hr Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain f Factor fights 1.001 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.000 = 22,000 ccupants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/oCC. / 10 sgft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 Receptacle 01 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft .x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 rocess 01 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.41 BtuhtWatt x 1.00 = 0 Infiltration:. _ 1_00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 X 9.00 X 0.50 / 60 X 38 = 16,572 Schedule Air Senst a Area Ceiling Heightp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Occupants 1.00 x 5,464 X 300 Btuh/oCC. /100 sgft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft x 1 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process I� 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sqft X 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 • Infiltration: I_ 1.00 x _ 4,771 x 5464 x 9.00 x 0.50 /6] x 0.00394 = 7709 schedule Air Latent) Area e I ng e g pW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 38 of 39 1 ROOM COOLING COIL LOADS ect Title Date La Quinta Professional Plaza -Parcel 6 & 7 6/12/03 ROOM INFORMATION DESIGN CONDITIONS Room Name Second Floor Time of Peak Jul 4 prn Floor Area 5,464 Outdoor Dry Bulb Temperature 1111: Indoor Dry Bulb Temperature 74c� Outdoor Wet Bulb Temperature 78 Conduction Area 1. Design Equivalent Temperature Difference (DETD) Items shown with an asterisk (') denote conduction through an interior surface to another room. Solar Gain U -Value DETD 1 Page Total Btu/hr Orientation Area x x x x x x x X X XF SGF x X X x x x X x X X Sc Weighting x x x x x x X X X x Factor = = = = = = = = = = Btu/hr (West) 25.0 204 0.746 0.412 1,563 (West) 27.0 204 0.746 0.412 1,689 (West) 30.0 141 0.746 0.427 1,350 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 0.427 1,575 (West) 35.0 204 0.746 0.412 2,189 (West) 35.0 204 0.746 0.412 2,189 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 0.427 1,575 (West) 35.0 141 0.746 0.427 1,575 (West) 30.0 204 0.746 0.412 1,876 (Northwest) 27.0 133 0.746 0.435 1,167 Page Total 1s,75o Sched. Weighting Internal Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain Factor Btulhr fights. 1.00 x 5,464 x 1.180 Watts/sgft x 3.41 BtuhMatt x 1.000 = 22,000 ccupants 00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/occ. / 10 sgft/occ. x 1.00 = 16,392 eceptacle. U x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.41 Btuh/Watt x 1:00 = 0 rocess _ 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft x 3.a1 Btuh/Watt x 1.00 = 0 Infiltration: 1_00 x _ 1.064 x 5,464 x 9.00 x 0.50 / 60] x 38 = 16,572 Schedule XI Sensib a Area Ceiling HeIght AUHp Fraction TOTAL HOURLY SENSIBLE HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 154,301 Sched. Btu/hr Latent Gain Frac. Area Heat Gain ccu' ants 1.00 x 5,464 x 300 Btuh/occ. /100 sqft/occ. = 16,392 Receptacle` 1.00 x 5,464 X 0.000 Watts/sgft xj 3.4131 Btuh/Watt = 0 Process • 1.00 x 5,464 x 0.000 Watts/sgft X 3.413 Btuh/Watt = 0 '`• Infiltration: FF_ x�l x x x / 60� x _ �09 1.00 4,771 5 464 9.00 0.50 0.00394 7 709 L_Schedule Air Latent)Area Cening ReigntpW Fraction TOTAL HOURLY LATENT HEAT GAIN FOR ROOM 24,101 EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft User Number: 5533 Page: 39 of 39 r' '•f Earth Systems Southwest 79-81 1 Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 (760)345-1588 (800)924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 April 11, 2001 File No.: 08119-01 011-04-716 Mc Dermott Enterprises P.O. Box 163 Palm Desert, California Attention: Mr. Colin McDermott Project: Proposed Commercial Development La Quinta, California Subject: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Dear Mr. McDermott: We take pleasure ,to present this Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the proposed - commercial development to be located ed on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 47 in the City of La Quinta, California... tThis report presents our findings and recommendations for site grading and foundation design, incorporating the information supplied to - our office. The site is suitable for the proposed.- development. roposed -development. The recommendations in this report should be incorporated into the proposed- design roposeddesign and construction. This report should stand as a whole, and no part -of the report should be excerpted or used to the exclusion of any other part. 1 This report completes our scope of services in accordance with our agreement, dated March 5, 2001 and authorized on March 7, 2001. Other services that may be required, such as plan review - and grading observation, are additional services and will.be billed according to the Fee Schedule ' in effect at the :time services are provided. Unless requested in writing, the client is responsible to distribute this report to the appropriate governing agency or other members of the design team. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our,professional services. Please contact our office if there are any questions or comments concerning this report or its recommendations. Respectfully su - EARTH SY WEST �G S. 'Craig S. CE 38234 m CE 3823 tr EXP. 0=1105 � 0� ' CM1. �SER/kah/cs AP of cP Distribution: 6 ott Enterprises 1NTA File ' 2/BD File TABLE OD7CONTENTS . Page - ' -z Section 8 1.1 l� - . � INTRODUCTION � ,....,~,,,_.~.,_..,,...^^,,,.^,..^,~..~..,.~.~~.,^,........,,,..~~.,...~~.,.,-_..~� Project ��*��u'''.'-.--1 ' ��c Description ............... ..--------_------.-_-------.----..l ' l.3 and Scope m{\�ork.---_-------..----..-------.-----�2 - ^ Section 2 2.1 2-2 METHODS ODrINVESTIGATION ..................................................................... -..---.--- Field �xpuuuu—_----,-------� ----------.3 �wou��uuy��uu'og----_------------.-.------'---.----.-.3 . 3 . � ���xm�� � 3.1 DISCUSSION u�x.m� ~ Soil Cooditio-_x� ^ ` � � ----..,.--.� .--.....--.-.---^------.----.---.* 4 � ^ � `- 3.2 . 33 ^ � 3/4 cuo�uu�u��r---.---._.---------.-_-.---'-----.-_.---./4 m�vu��u`u�xuu�----.--.-.--.-----.---------------.-.`-.../4, ��cw��pi�I�azu�du ` � '-=,- ---.-.-.----.-......--------------.-^.----5 � � ^ 3'4.1 Seismic Hazards ........................ �.................................................................. 5 ~ . 3.4.2 Secondary Hazards ........... --.----.---.----'-.--.---.�-.-.,.6 3'4.3Site Acceleration and Seiuoz�.(�me{�oieot8----.----.......................7 Section4 ~~~-~~~~~~` . '~~~~~~~`~~~~-~~~^...~~~~r~~~~~~~.' - � - Section,5 D�O � RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... SITE ����(�I�u��D�(� �/�,����rau�r�� ---.---.--.------_.-------l0 5l ��� ' . �/�"cu�po/uu�-u�ouo��.�-------------------.--------l0 5.2 Excavations and Utility Trenches ........................................................................... ll ^ ' 53 Slope Stability of Graded Slopes .......................................... ................................... ll STRUCTURES................ ..............................................----.------------J2� . � - 5/4 . ru .~_._.____�..:_____._________.____.__.~__..}2. ' 5� 5� . . � ........................................... ' \�ol� o��uuuu� ----....._-----..--_---.-----------.�---..l4 . ' 5.7Mitigation . of Soil muConcrete ---..'....----.---'------..l5�'`� . 5.0 SeismicDesign- Criteria ....................... .................................................................. l5 _ 5.9 Pavements ..... --------------''---'--'''�---------'----'l6'' . . Section 6 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES .......................................... `. 17 ' ' �l . .uuuo�uu�yuu�x�ao/uoo� oo�Tin`�n+i`�n _--'-----~.---..------.---.------.l7- ^ ' . 6.2 Additional Services ................................................................................................ l8 -- REFERENCES ~.~....,.--~_.~, '..^,.....,,....^.^,'.,^^....^.^......^.^..^.^.,^.^.�.....,..^.^.^^,,,...^^^.^^,,.^.^.^ �� . ��� - . Site Location 0�un --, � _ . Location Map Table l Fault Parameters 2008International Building C(IBC) Seismic Parameters ' Looamf- '-_-~..~.~. DB Laboratory Test Results . . . . .` EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST � ^ April 11, 2001 --1 - File No.: 03119-01 01-04-716 Section 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description This Geotechnical Engineering Report has been prepared for the proposed commercial development to be located between Washington Street and Caleo Bay, and south of Avenue 47 in the City of La Quinta, California. ' Thero osed new buildings will consist of one and two-story t p< p g ry s ructures. We understand that the proposed structures will be of wood frame and stucco construction and will. be supported by ' conventional shallow continuous or pad footings. Site development will include site grading, building pad preparation, underground utility installation, street and parking lot construction, and concrete driveway and sidewalk placement. Based on existing site topography, site grading is ' expected to consist of fills not exceeding approximately 5 -feet. We used maximum column loads of 50 kips and a maximum wall loading of 2.5, kips per linear ' foot as a basis for the foundation recommendations. All loading is assumed to be dead plus actual live .load. The preliminary design loading was assumed based on our understanding of the construction type and number of supported floors. If actual structural loading exceeds these assumed values, we would need to reevaluate the given recommendations. 1.2 Site Description The proposed. commercial development is to be constructed on 'the irregular p g shaped parcel as shown on Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A. The site is currently vacant of structures. Evidence of past development of the site is apparent. Miscellaneous construction debris is present throughout the site. A closed depression (approximately 5 feet in depth) of unknown origin is located near the southwest corner of the site and is within the footprint of the proposed 4000 -ftp office ' building. A buried concrete slab was encountered while drilling in the southeast portion of the site (see Boring B-1). A review of historic aerial photos shows that past development of the site' was apparently concentrated in the southern portion of the site. . The site is relativelyflat with minor surface variations of 1 t o 3 feet, except in the area of the closed depression that was approximately 5 feet in depth. A sparse to moderate growth of weeds ' and brush including some trees cover the site. The site is generally bounded by 47`h Avenue to . . the north, to the east by Caleo Bay, to the south by- vacant land and to the west. by Washington Street. The elevation of the site is approximately 60 feet above mean sea level. Underground utilities are believed to exist along g the site boundaries and may encroach wrtlun the proposed areas for building and development. Presumably abandoned on-site underground ' utilities associated with past development are also assumed to exist on the site.. These utility lines may include, but are not limited to, domestic water, telephone, electrical, sewer/septic (including septic tank, leach lines and/or seepage pit or cesspool) and irrigation lines. EARTH SYSTEMS"SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 2 -.. File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose for our services was to evaluate the site soil conditions and to provide professional opinions and recommendations regarding the proposed development of the site. The scope of work included the following: ' ➢ Aeneral reconnaissance g of the site. ➢ Shallow subsurface exploration by drilling 5 exploratory borings to depths ranging from 29 to 51.5 feet. ➢ 'Laboratory testing of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings. ➢ Review of selected published technical literature pertaining to the site. ' ➢ Engineering analysis and evaluation of the acquired data from the exploration and testing programs. ➢ A summary of our findings and recommendations in this written report. This report contains the following: Discussions on subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. ➢ Discussions on regional and local geologic conditions. Discussions on geologic and seismic hazards. ➢ Graphic and tabulated results of laboratory tests and field studies. Recommendations regarding: • Site development and grading criteria, ' + Excavation conditions and buried utility installations, • Structure foundation type and design, • Allowable foundation bearing capacity and expected total and differential settlements, • Concrete slabs -on -grade, • Lateral earthressures and coefficients, , • Mitigation of the potential corrosivity of site soils to concrete and steel reinforcement, • Seismic design parameters, • Preliminary pavement structural sections. Not Contained In This Report: Although available through Earth Systems Southwest, the current scope of our services does not include: ➢ A corrosive study to determine cathodic protection of concrete or buried pipes. ' ➢ An environmental assessment. ➢ Investigation for the presence or absence of wetlands, hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air on, below, or adjacent to the subject property. ' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 3 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 Section 2 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 2.1 Field Exploration Five exploratory borings were drilled to depths ranging from 29 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface to observe the soil profile and to obtain samples for laboratory testing. The borings were drilled on March 8, 2001 using 8 -inch outside diameter hollow -stem augers, and powered by a Mobile B61 truck -mounted drilling rig. The boring locations are shown on the boring location map, Figure 2, 'in Appendix A. The locations shown are approximate, established by pacing and sighting from existing topographic features. Samples were obtained within the test, borings using a Standard Penetration (SPT) sampler (ASTM D 1586) and a Modified California (MC) ring sampler (ASTM D. 3550 with shoe similar to ASTM D 1586). The SPT sampler has a 2 -inch outside diameter and a 1.38 -inch inside diameter. The MC sampler has a 3 -inch outside diameter and a 2.37 -inch inside diameter. The samples were obtained by driving the sampler with a 140 -pound automatic hammer dropping 30 inches in general accordance with ASTM D 1586. Recovered soil samples were sealed in containers and retumed to the laboratory. Bulk samples were also obtained from auger cuttings, representing a mixture of soils encountered at the depths noted. The final logs of the borings represent our interpretation of the contents of the field logs and the results of laboratory testing performed on the samples obtained during the subsurface investigation. The final logs are included in Appendix A of this report. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types' although the transitions may be gradational. 2.2 Laboratory Testing Samples were reviewed along with field logs to select those that would be analyzed further. Those selected for laboratory testing include soils that would be exposed and used during grading, and those deemed to be within the influence of the proposed structures. Test results are presented in graphic and tabular form in Appendix B of this report. The tests were conducted in general accordance with the procedures of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other standardized methods as referenced below. Our testing program consisted of the following: ➢ In-situ Moisture Content and Unit Dry Weight for the ring samples (ASTM D 2937). ➢ Maximum density tests were performed to evaluate the moisture -density relationship of typical soils encountered (ASTM D 15577-91). ➢ Particle Size Analysis ,(ASTM D 422) to classify and evaluate soil composition. The gradation characteristics of selected samples were made by hydrometer and sieve analysis procedures. ➢ Consolidation (Collapse Potential) (ASTM D 2435 and D 5333) to evaluate the compressibility and hydroconsolidation (collapse) potential of the soil. ➢ Chemical Analyses (Soluble Sulfates & Chlorides, pH, and Electrical Resistivity) to evaluate the potential adverse effects of the soil on concrete and steel. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 4 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 Section 3 DISCUSSION 3.1. Soil Conditions' The field exploration indicates that site soils consist primarily of medium dense, interbedded silty Sand, Silt and Sand (Unified Soil Classification Symbols of SM, ML, and SP -SM, respectively). The boring logs provided in Appendix A include more detailed descriptions of the F soils encountered. The soils are visually classified to be in the very low expansion category in accordance with Table 18A -I -B of the Uniform Building Code. ' In and climatic regions, granular soils may have a potential to collapse upon wetting. Collapse (hydroconsolidation) may occur when the soluble cements (carbonates) in the soil matrix dissolve, causing the soil to densify from'its loose configuration from deposition. Consolidation ' tests indicate 2.2 to 3.6% collapse upon inundation and are considered a moderate site risk at depths of 17.5 feet in Boring 4 and '10 feet in Boring 3, respectively. The hydroconsolidation potential' is commonly mitigated by recompaction of a zone beneath building pads. However, due to the depth of the potential hydroconsolidation, removal and recompaction to a depth of 20 ' feet is not economically reasonable. Therefore, alternative foundation recommendations 'are offered for your consideration. .. 3.2 Groundwater Free groundwater -=was not =encountered' -in- the, borings during exploration. The depth to groundwater in the area is believed to be in excess of 100 feet. Groundwater levels may fluctuate with precipitation, irrigation, drainage, regional pumping from wells, and site grading. The absence of groundwater levels detected may, not represent an accurate or permanent condition. , 3.3 Geologic Setting Regional Geology: The site lien within the Coachella Valley, a part of the Colorado Desert geomorphic province. A significant feature within the Colorado Desert geomorphic province is the Salton Trough. The Salton Trough isa. large northwest -trending structural depression that extends from San Gorgonio Pass, approximately 180 miles to the Gulf of California. Much of ' this, depression in the area of the Salton Sea is below.sea level. The Coachella Valley forms the "northerly portion of the. Salton Trough. The Coachella Valley contains a thick sequence of sedimentary deposits that are Miocene to recent in age. Mountains ' _ surrounding the Coachella Valley include the Little San Bernardino Mountains on the northeast, foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains on the northwest, and the San. Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains on the southwest. These mountains expose primarily Precambrian metamorphic and Mesozoic granitic rocks. The San Andreas Fault zone within the Coachella Valley consists of the Garnet Hill Fault, the -Banning Fault, and the Mission Creek Fault that traverse along the, y northeast margin of the valley. Local Geology: The project site lies at an elevation of about 60 -feet above mean sea level inAhe ., lower part of the La Quinta Cove portion of the Coachella Valley. The La Quinta Cove is situated on an alluvial wedge between two granite mountain spurs of the Santa Rosa Mountains. . " EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST ` ' April 11, 2001 -5- File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 The waters of ancient Lake Cahuilla once covered the project site. The sediments within the cove consist of fine to coarse-grained sands with interbedded clays, silts, and gravels of aeolian (wind-blown), alluvial (water laid), and lacustrine (lake bed) origin. The site is located near the boundary between the lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake Cahuilla, and alluvial deposits from the Santa Rosa Mountains to the south. 3.4 Geologic Hazards Geologic hazards that may affect the region include seismic hazards (ground shaking, surface fault rupture, soil liquefaction, and other secondary earthquake -related hazards), slope instability, flooding, ground subsidence, and erosion. A discussion follows on the specific hazards to this site. 3.4.1 Seismic Hazards Seismic Sources: Several active faults or seismic zones lie within 62 miles (100 kilometers) of the project site as shown on Table 1 in Appendix A. The primary seismic hazard to the site is strong groundshaking from earthquakes along the San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults. ' The Maximum Magnitude Earthquake (Mmax) listed is from published geologic information available_ for each fault (CDMG, 1996). The Mmax corresponds to the maximum earthquake believed to be tectonically possible. Surface Fault Rupture: The project site does not lie within a currently delineated State of California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart, 1994). Well -delineated fault lines cross through this region as shown on California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) maps (Jennings, 1994). Therefore, active fault rupture is unlikely to occur at the project site. While fault rupture would most likely occur along previously established fault traces, future fault rupture could occur at other locations. Historic Seismicity: Six historic seismic events (5.9 M or greater) have significantly affected the Coachella Valley the last 100 years. They are as follows: • Desert Hot Springs Earthquake - On December 4, 1948, a magnitude 6.5 ML (6.OMW) earthquake occurred east of Desert Hot Springs. This event was strongly felt in the Palm Springs area. • Palm Springs Earthquake - A magnitude 5'.9 ML (6.2MW) earthquake occurred on July 8, 1986 in the Painted Hills causing minor surface creep of the Banning segment of the San Andreas Fault. This event was strongly felt in the Palm Springs area and caused structural damage, as well as injuries. • Joshua Tree Earthquake - On April 22, 1992, a magnitude 6.1 ML (6.1MW) earthquake occurred in the mountains 9 miles east of Desert Hot Springs. Structural damage and minor injuries occurred in the Palm Springs area as a result of this earthquake. ' • Landers & Big Bear Earthquakes - Early on June 28, 1992, 1a magnitude 7.5 Ms (7.3MW) earthquake occurred near Landers, the largest seismic event in Southern California for 40 years. Surface rupture occurred just south of the town of Yucca Valley and extended some 43 miles toward Barstow. About. three hours later, a magnitude 6.6 Ms (6.4MW) earthquake occurred near Big Bear Lake. No significant structural damage from these earthquakes was reported. in the Palm Springs area. • . Hector Mine Earthquake - On October 16, 1999, a magnitude 7.1MW earthquake occurred on the Lavic Lake and Bullion Mountain Faults north of 29 Palms. This event while widely felt, no significant structural damage has been reported in the Coachella Valley. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Aril 11 2001 April � -6- File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 Seismic Risk: While accurate earthquake predictions are not possible, various agencies have conducted statistical risk analyses. In 1996, the California Division of Mines and Geology �. (CDMG) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) completed the latest generation of probabilistic seismic hazard maps for use in the 1997 UBC. We have used these maps in our evaluation of the seismic risk at the site. The Working Group ' of California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP, 1995) estimated a 22% conditional probability that a magnitude 7 or greater earthquake may occur between 1994 to 2024 along the Coachella segment of the San .. Andreas Fault. The primary seismic risk at the site ' is a potential earthquake along the San Andreas Fault. Geologists believe that the San Andreas Fault has characteristic earthquakes that result from rupture of each fault segment. The estimated characteristic earthquake is magnitude 7.4 for the Southern Segment of the fault. This segment has the, longest elapsed time since rupture than any other portion of the San Andreas Fault. The last rupture occurred about 1690 AD, based on dating by the USGS near Indio (WGCEP, 1995). This segment has also ruptured on about 1020, 1300, and 1450 AD, with an average recurrence interval of about 220 years. The San Andreas Fault ' may rupture in multiple segments producing a higher magnitude earthquake. Recent paleoseismic studies suggest that the San Bernardino Mountain Segment to the north and the Coachella Segment may have both ruptured together in 1450 and 1690 AD (WGCEP, 1995). 3.4.2 Secondary Hazards Secondary seismic hazards related to ground shaking include soil liquefaction, ground deformation, areal subsidence, tsunamis, and seiches. The site is far inland so the hazard from tsunamis is non-existent. An existing residential development that includes a man made lake is located immediately southeast of the project site, therefore, hazards from seiches (water sloshing) should be considered a slight site risk. Soil Liquefaction: Liquefaction is the loss of soil strength from sudden shock (usually earthquake shaking), causing the soil to become a fluid mass. In general, for the effects of liquefaction to be manifested at the surface, groundwater levels must be within 50 feet of the ground surface and the soils within the saturated zone must also be susceptible to liquefaction. The potential for liquefaction to occur at this site is considered negligible because the depth of groundwater beneath the site exceeds 50 feet. No free groundwater was encountered in our exploratory borings. 14 ----addition, -the- -project -not-lie within the Riverside County liquefaction study zone. . Ground Deformation and Subsidence: Non -Tectonic ground deformation consists of cracking of the ground with little to no displacement. This type of deformation is .generally associated with differential shaking of two or more geologic units with differing engineering characteristics. Ground deformation may, also be caused by liquefaction. As the site is relatively flat with consistent geologic material, and has a low potential for liquefaction, the potential for ground - deformation is also considered to be low. The potential for seismically induced ground subsidence is considered to be low to 'moderate' at the site. Dry sands tend to settle and densify when subjected to strong earthquake shaking. The amount of subsidence is dependent on relative density of the soil, groundshaking (cyclic shear EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April11, 2001 - 7 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 strain), and earthquake duration, (number of strain cycles). Uncompacted fill areas may be susceptible to seismically induced settlement. Slope Instability: The site is relatively flat. Therefore, potential hazards from slope instability, landslides, or debris flows are considered negligible.- Flooding: egligible:Flooding: The project site does not lie within a designated FEMA 100 -year flood plain. The project site may be in an area where sheet flooding and erosion could .occur. If significant changes are proposed for the site, appropriate project design, construction, and maintenance can minimize the site sheet flooding potential. 3.4.3 Site Acceleration and Seismic Coefficients Site Acceleration: The potential. intensity of ground motion may be estimated from the horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA), measured in "g" forces. Included in. Table 1 are deterministic estimates of site acceleration from possible earthquakes at nearby faults. Ground motions are dependent primarily on the earthquake magnitude and distance to the seismogenic (rupture) zone. Accelerations also are dependent upon attenuation by rock and soil deposits, direction of rupture, and type of fault. For these reasons, ground motions may vary considerably -in the same general area. This variability can be expressed statistically by a standard deviation about a mean relationship. The PGA is an inconsistent scaling factor to compare to the UBC Z factor and is generally a poor indicator of potential structural damage during an earthquake. Important factors influencing the structural performance are the duration and frequency of strong ground motion, local subsurface conditions, soil -structure interaction, and structural details. Because of these factors, an effective peak acceleration (EPA) is used in structural design. The following table provides the, probabilistic estimate of the PGA and EPA taken from the 1996 CDMG/USGS seismic hazard maps. Estimate of PGA and EPA from 1996 CDMG/USGS Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps Equivalent Return Approximate Risk Period (years) PGA (g) .1 EPA (g) Z 10% exceedance in 50 years 475 0.50 0.45 Notes: 1. Based on a soft rock site, SB/c and soil amplification factor of 1.0 for Soil Profile Type Sp. 2. Spectral acceleration (SA) at period of 0.3 seconds divided by 2.5 for 5% damping, as defined by the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC,-1996). 1997 UBC Seismic Coefficients: The Uniform Building Code (UBC) seismic design are based on a Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) that has an earthquake ground motion with a 10% probability of occurrence in 50 years. The PGA and EPA estimates given above are provided for information on the seismic risk inherent in the UBC.design. The following lists the seismic and site coefficients given in Chapter 16 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 8 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 1997 UBC Seismic Coefficients for Chapter 16 Seismic Provisions p t, Reference Seismic Zone: 4 Figure 16-2 Seismic Zone Factor, Z: 0.4 Table 16-I Soil -Profile Type:- - Sp _..r Table 16-J cSeismic Source Type:. • - _ A - Table 16-U Closest Distance to Known Seismic Source: 9.6 km = 6.0 miles (San Andreas Fault) tNear Source- Factor -;-Na - 1.02 Table 16-S Near Source Factor, Nv: 1.23 Table 16-T Seismic Coefficient, Ca: 0.45 = 0.44Na Table 16-Q Seismic Coefficient, Cv: 0.79 = 0.64Nv Table 16-R Seismic Zoning: The Seismic Safety Element of the 1984 Riverside County General Plan establishes groundshaking hazard zones. Thep roject area is mapped in Ground Shaking Zone BIB Ground Shaking Zones are based on distance from causative faults and underlying soil types. The site does not lie within the Liquefaction Hazard area established by this Seismic r Safety Element. These groundshaking hazard zones are used in deciding suitability of land use. 2000 IBC Seismic Coefficients: For comparative purposes, the newly released 2000 International Building Code (IBC) seismic and site -coefficients are given in Appendix A. As of the issuance of this report, we are unaware when governing jurisdictions may adopt or modify the IBC provisions. i - i 1 - EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 9 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 Section 4 CONCLUSIONS The following is a summary of our conclusions and professional opinions based on the data obtained from a review of selected technical literature and the site evaluation. General: ➢ From a geotechnical perspective, the site is suitable for the proposed development. The recommendations in this report should be incorporated into the design and construction of this project. Geotechnical Constraints and Mitigation: ➢ The primary geologic hazard is severe ground shaking from earthquakes originating on nearby faults. A major earthquake above magnitude 7 originating on the local segment of the San Andreas Fault zone would be the critical seismic event that may affect the site within the design life of the proposed development. Engineered design and earthquake - resistant construction increase safety and allow development of seismic areas. ➢ The project site is in seismic Zone 4 and about 9.6 km from a Type A seismic source as defined in the Uniform Building Code. A qualified professional should design any permanent structure constructed on the site. The minimum seismic design should comply with the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code. Ground subsidence from seismic events or hydroconsolidation is a potential hazard in the Coachella Valley area. Adherence to the grading and structural recommendations in this report should reduce potential settlement problems from seismic forces, heavy rainfall or irrigation, flooding, and the weight of the intended structures at least within the upper 5 feet of finish grade. Due to the potential long-term settlement due to deep saturation of soils susceptible to hydroconsolidation, special considerations should be given to the foundation slab -on -grade system. Please refer to the "Foundation" section of this report for additional discussion and recommendations. ➢ The soils are susceptible to wind and water erosion. Preventative measures to reduce seasonal flooding and erosion should be incorporated into site grading plans. Dust control should also be implemented during construction. Other geologic hazards including ground rupture, liquefaction, seismically induced flooding, and landslides are considered low or negligible on this site. ➢ The upper soils were found to be relatively loose to medium dense Silty Sand and Silt and are unsuitable in their present condition to support structures, fill, and hardscape. The soils within the building and structural areas will require moisture conditioning, over excavation, and recompaction to improve bearing capacity and reduce settlement from static loading. Soils can be readily cut by normal grading equipment. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 10 File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 Section 5 RECOMMENDATIONS SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING 5.1 Site Development - Grading A representative of Earth Systems.Southwest (ESSW) should observe site clearing, grading, and the bottom of excavations prior to placing fill. Local variations in soil conditions may warrant increasing the depth of recompaction and over -excavation. Clearing and Grubbing: Prior to site grading, the existing vegetation, trees, large roots, pavements, foundations, non -engineered fill, construction debris, trash, abandoned underground utilities, and other deleterious material should be removed from the proposed building, structural, and pavement areas. The surface should be stripped of organic growth and removed from the construction area. Areas disturbed during demolition and clearing should be properly backfilled �. and compacted as described below. Building Pad Preparation: Because of the relatively non-uniform and under -compacted nature of the majority of the site soils, we recommend recompaction of soils in the building areas. The existing surface soils within the building pad and foundation areas should be over -excavated to a minimum of 48 inches below existing grade or a minimum of 36 inches below the footing level (whichever is lower). The over -excavation should extend for 5 feet beyond the outer edge of exterior footings. The bottom of the sub -excavation should be scarified; moisture conditioned, and recompacted to at least 90 % relative compaction (ASTM D 1557) for an additional depth of 12 inches. Moisture penetration to near optimum moisture should extend at least 24 inches below the bottom of the over -excavation and be verified by testing. Auxiliary Structures Subgrade Preparation: Auxiliary structures such as garden or retaining walls should have the foundation subgrade prepared similar to the building pad recommendations given above. The lateral extent of the over -excavation needs only to extend 2 feet beyond the face of the footing. Subgrade Preparation: In areas to receive fill pavements, �' p , p nts, or hardscape, the subgrade should be scarified; moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction (ASTM D 1557) for a depth of 12 inches below finished subgrades. Compaction should be verified by testing. Areas subjected to traffic loads should be prepared in accordance with Section 5.9, "Pavements." Engineered Fill Soils: The native soil is suitable for use as engineered fill and utility trench backfill provided it is free of significant organic or deleterious matter.; The native soil should be placed in maximum 8 -inch lifts (loose) and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction: (ASTM D 1557) near its optimum moisture content. Compaction should be verified by testing. Imported fill soils (if required) should be non -expansive, granular soils meeting the USCS classifications of SM, SP -SM, or SW -SM with a maximum rock size of 3 inches and 5 to 35% passing the No. 200 sieve. The geotechnical engineer should evaluate the import fill ' soils before hauling to the site. However, because of the potential variations within the borrow source, import soil will not be pre -qualified by ESSW. The imported fill should be placed in lifts �. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 11 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 no greater than 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to, at least 90% relative compaction (ASTM D 1557) near optimum moisture content. Shrinkage: The shrinkage factor for earthwork is expected to range from 15 to 20 percent for the upper excavated or scarified site soils. This estimate is based on compactive effort to achieve an average relative compaction of about 92% and may vary with contractor methods. Subsidence is estimated to range from 0.1 to 0.2 feet. Losses from site clearing and removal of existing site improvements may affect earthwork quantity calculations and should be considered. Site Drainage: Positive drainage should be maintained away from the structures (5% for 5 feet minimum) to prevent ponding and subsequent saturation of the foundation soils. Gutters and downspouts should be considered as a means to convey water away from foundations if adequate drainage is not provided. Drainage should be maintained for paved areas. Water should not pond on or near paved areas. 5.2 Excavations and Utility Trenches Excavations should be made in accordance with CalOSHA requirements. Our site exploration and knowledge of the general area indicates there is a potential for caving of site excavations (utilities, footings, etc.). Excavations'within sandy soil should be kept moist, but not saturated, to reduce the potential of caving or sloughing. Where excavations over 4 feet deep are planned, lateral bracing or appropriate cut slopes of 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) should be provided. No surcharge loads from stockpiled soils or construction materials should be allowed within a horizontal distance measured from the top of the excavation slope, equal to the depth of the excavation. Utility Trenches: Backfill of utilities within road or public right-of-ways should be placed in conformance with the requirements of the governing agency (water district, public works . department, etc.) Utility trench backfill within private property should be placed in conformance with the provisions of this report. In general, service lines extending inside of property may be - backfilled with native soils compacted to a minimum of 901/o relative. compaction. Backfill operations should be observed and tested to monitor compliance with these recommendations. 5.3 Slope Stability of Graded Slopes Unprotected, permanent graded slopes should not be steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) to reduce wind -and rain erosion. Protected slopes with ground cover may be as steep as 2:1., However, maintenance with motorized equipment may not be possible at this inclination. Fill slopes should be overfilled and trimmed back to competent material. Slope stability calculations are not presented because of the expected minimal slope heights (less than 5 feet). April 11, 2001 - 12 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 STRUCTURES In our professional opinion, the structure foundation can be supported on shallow foundations bearing on a zone of properly prepared and compacted soils placed as recommended in Section 5.1. The recommendations that follow are based on very low expansion category soils. 5.4 Foundations Footing design of widths,. depths, and reinforcing are the responsibility of the Structural Engineer, considering the structural loading and the geotechnical parameters given in this report. A_minimum_footing depth. of _12 inches below ,lowest adjacent :grade should be maintained fors one-story structures and -15 -inches below_ lowest adjacent grade should be maintained for two- story structures. A representative of ESSW should observe foundation excavations prior to placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. Loose soil or construction debris should be removed from footing excavations prior to placement of concrete. Conventional Spread Foundations: Allowable soil bearing pressures are given below for foundations bearing on recompacted soils as described in Section 5.1. =A_llo_wable-:b_earng- pressures -are net (weight of footing and soil surcharge may be neglected).. ➢ Continuous wall foundations, 12 -inch minimum width and 12 inches below grade: 150.0 psf for dead plus design live loads Allowable increases of 250 psf per each foot of additional footing width and 250 psf for each additional 0.5 foot of footing depth may be used up to a maximum value of 2500 psf. ➢ Isolated pad foundations, 2 x 2 foot minimum in plan and 18 inches below grade: 2000 psf-for dead plus design live loads Allowable increases of 250 psf per each foot of additional footing width and 350 psf for each additional 0.5 foot of footing depth may be used up to a maximum value of 2500 psf. A one-third (1/3) increase in the bearing pressure may be used when calculating resistance to- ' wind or seismic loads. The allowable bearing values indicated are based on the anticipated maximum loads stated -in Section 1.1 of this report. If the anticipated loads exceed .these values, the geotechnical engineer must reevaluate the allowable bearing values and the grading requirements. Minimum reinforcement for continuous wall footings should be tw6,-No..4 steel -reinforcing bars, one placed -near the top and one placed near the bottom of the footing: This reinforcing is not intended to supersede any structural requirements provided by the structural engineer. Grade Beam and Structural Flat Plate Foundation Alternate: An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf may be used in design of an alternate foundation system. A modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 pci may be used with an expected differential settlement of up to 1 -inch in a 25 -foot span (1/300). Expected Settlement: Estimated total static settlement, based on footings founded on firm soils as recommended, should be less than 1 inch. Differential settlement between exterior and interior bearing members should be less than 1/2 -inch. These numbers might increase by a factor of 2 to account for potential deep-seated hydroconsolidation. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST r 1, April 11, 2001 -13- File No.: 08119-01 .01-04-716 Frictional and Lateral Coefficients: Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction on the base of the foundations and by passive resistance of the soils acting on foundation walls. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 of dead load may be used. An allowable passive equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pcf may also be used. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Passive resistance and frictional resistance may be used in combination if the friction coefficient is reduced to 0.23 of dead load forces. A one-third (1/3) increase in the passive pressure may be used when calculating resistance to wind or seismic loads. Lateral passive resistance is based on the assumption that any required backfill adjacent to foundations is properly compacted. 5.5 Slabs -on -Grade Sub rade: Concrete slabs -on -grade and flatwork should be supported by compacted soil placed in accordance with Section 5.1 of this report. Vapor Barrier: In areas of moisture sensitive floor coverings, an appropriate vapor barrier should be installed to reduce moisture transmission from the subgrade soil to the slab. For these areas an impermeable membrane (10 -mil moisture barrier) should underlie the floor slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to help protect `it during construction and to aide in concrete curing. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. Low -slump concrete should be used to help reduce the potential for concrete shrinkage. The effectiveness of the moisture barrier is dependent upon its quality, method of overlapping, its protection during construction, and the successful sealing of the barrier around utility lines. Slab thickness and reinforcement: Slab thickness and reinforcement of slab -on -grade are contingent on the recommendations of the structural engineer or architect and the expansion index of the supporting soil. Based upon our findings, a modulus of subgrade reaction of approximately 200 pounds per cubic inch can be used in concrete slab design for the expected very low expansion subgrade. Concrete slabs and flatwork should be a minimum of_A:inches thick. We suggest that the concrete slabs be reinforced with a minimum of No -3, ars centers, both horizontal directions, placed at slab mid -height to resist swell forces and cracking. Concrete floor slabs may either be monolithically placed with the foundations or doweled after footing placement. The thickness and reinforcing given are not intended to supersede any structural requirements provided by the structural engineer. The project architect or geotechnical engineer should continually observe all reinforcing steel in slabs during placement'of concrete to check for proper location within the slab. Control Joints: Control joints should be provided in all concrete slabs -on -grade at a maximum spacing of 36 times the slab thickness (12 feet maximum on -center, each way) as recommended by American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. All joints should form approximately square patterns to reduce the potential for randomly oriented, contraction cracks. Contraction joints in the slabs should be tooled at the time of the pour or saw cut (1/4 of slab depth) within 8 hours of concrete placement. Construction (cold) joints should consist of thickened butt joints with one- half inch dowels at 18 -inches on center or a thickened keyed joint to resist vertical deflection at the joint. All construction joints in exterior flatwork should be sealed to reduce the potential of moisture or foreign material intrusion. These procedures will reduce the potential for randomly oriented cracks, but may not prevent them from occurring. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST 11 .1 April 11, 2001 -14- File No.: 08119-01 . 01-0.1-716 Curing and Quality Control: The contractor should take precautions to reduce the potential of. curling of slabs in this and desert region using proper batching, placement, and curing methods. Curing is,highly effected by temperature, wind, and humidity. Quality control procedures may be used including trial batch mix designs, batch plant inspection, and on-site special inspection and testing. Typically, using 2500 -psi concrete, many of these quality control procedures are not required. 5.6 Retaining Walls The following table presents lateral earth pressures for use in retainingwall design. The values are given as equivalent fluid pressures without surcharge loads or hydrostatic pressure. '.f Notes: - 1. These values are ultimate values. A factor of safety of 1.5 should be used in stability analysis except for dynamic earth pressure where a factor of safety of 1.2 is acceptable. 2. Dynamic pressures are based on the Mononobe-Okabe 1929 method, additive to active earth pressure. Walls retaining less than 6 feet of soil need not consider this increased pressure. 'x Upward sloping backfill or surcharge loads from nearby footings can create larger lateral pressures. Should any walls be considered for retaining sloped backfill or placed next to foundations, our office should be contacted for recommended design parameters. Surcharge loads should be considered if they exist within a zone between the face of the wall and a plane projected 45 degrees upward from the base of the wall. The increase in lateral earth pressure should be taken as 35% of the surcharge load within this zone. Retaining walls subjected to traffic loads should include a uniform surcharge load equivalent to at least 2 feet of native soil. Drainage: A backdrain or an equivalent system of backfill drainage should be -incorporated into the retaining wall design. Our firm can provide construction details when the specific application is determined. Backfill immediately behind the retaining structure should be a free - draining granular material. Waterproofing should be according to the designer's specifications. Water should not be allowed to pond near the top of the wall. To accomplish this, the final backfill grade should be such that all water is diverted away from the retaining wall. Backfill and Subgrade Compaction: Compaction on the retained side of the wall within a horizontal distance equal .to one wall height should be performed by hand -operated or other ' lightweight compaction equipment. .This is intended to reduce potential locked -in lateral pressures caused by compaction with heavy grading equipment. Foundation subgrade preparation should be as specified in Section 5.1. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Lateral Pressures and Sliding Resistance Granular Backfill Passive Pressure 300 pcf - level ground Active Pressure (cantilever walls) 35 pcf - level ground Use when wall is ermitted to rotate 0.1% of wall height At -Rest Pressure (restrained walls) 55 pcf - level ground Dynamic Lateral Earth Pressure Acting at mid height of structure, 21H psf Where H is height of backfill in feet Base Lateral Sliding Resistance Dead load x Coefficient of Fri ction: 0.50 '.f Notes: - 1. These values are ultimate values. A factor of safety of 1.5 should be used in stability analysis except for dynamic earth pressure where a factor of safety of 1.2 is acceptable. 2. Dynamic pressures are based on the Mononobe-Okabe 1929 method, additive to active earth pressure. Walls retaining less than 6 feet of soil need not consider this increased pressure. 'x Upward sloping backfill or surcharge loads from nearby footings can create larger lateral pressures. Should any walls be considered for retaining sloped backfill or placed next to foundations, our office should be contacted for recommended design parameters. Surcharge loads should be considered if they exist within a zone between the face of the wall and a plane projected 45 degrees upward from the base of the wall. The increase in lateral earth pressure should be taken as 35% of the surcharge load within this zone. Retaining walls subjected to traffic loads should include a uniform surcharge load equivalent to at least 2 feet of native soil. Drainage: A backdrain or an equivalent system of backfill drainage should be -incorporated into the retaining wall design. Our firm can provide construction details when the specific application is determined. Backfill immediately behind the retaining structure should be a free - draining granular material. Waterproofing should be according to the designer's specifications. Water should not be allowed to pond near the top of the wall. To accomplish this, the final backfill grade should be such that all water is diverted away from the retaining wall. Backfill and Subgrade Compaction: Compaction on the retained side of the wall within a horizontal distance equal .to one wall height should be performed by hand -operated or other ' lightweight compaction equipment. .This is intended to reduce potential locked -in lateral pressures caused by compaction with heavy grading equipment. Foundation subgrade preparation should be as specified in Section 5.1. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Lateral Pressures and Sliding Resistance Granular Backfill Passive Pressure 300 pcf - level ground Active Pressure (cantilever walls) 35 pcf - level ground Use when wall is ermitted to rotate 0.1% of wall height At -Rest Pressure (restrained walls) 55 pcf - level ground Dynamic Lateral Earth Pressure Acting at mid height of structure, 21H psf Where H is height of backfill in feet Base Lateral Sliding Resistance Dead load x Coefficient of Fri April 11, 2001 - 15 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 5.7 Mitigation of Soil Corrosivity on Concrete Selected chemical analyses for corrosivity were conducted on samples at the project site. The native soils were found to have moderate to severe sulfate ion concentration (0.10 to 0.20%) and moderate chloride ion concentration (0.09%). Sulfate ions can attack the cementitious material in concrete, causing weakening of the cement matrix and eventual deterioration by raveling. Chloride ions can cause corrosion of reinforcing steel. The Uniform Building Code does not require any special provisions for concrete for these low concentrations as tested. The Uniform Building Code requires for severe sulfate conditions that Type V Portland Cement be used with- a maximum water cement ratio of 0.45 using a 4,500 psi concrete mix (UBC Table 19-A-4). A minimum concrete cover of three (3) inches should be provided around steel reinforcing or embedded components exposed to native soil or landscape water (to 18 inches above grade). Additionally, the concrete should be thoroughly vibrated during placement. Electrical resistivity testing of the soil suggests that the site soils may present a very severe potential for metal loss from electrochemical corrosion processes. Corrosion protection of steel can be achieved by using epoxy corrosion inhibitors, asphalt coatings, cathodic protection, or encapsulating with. densely consolidated concrete. A qualified corrosion engineer should be - consulted regarding mitigation of the corrosive effects of site soils on metals. 5.8 Seismic Design Criteria This site is subject to strong ground shaking due to potential fault movements along the San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults. Engineered design and earthquake -resistant construction' increase safety and allow development of seismic areas. The minimum seismic design should comply with the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 using the seismic coefficients given in Section 3.4.3. The UBC seismic coefficients are based on scientific knowledge, engineering judgment, and compromise. Factors that play an important role in dynamic structural performance are: (1) Effective peak acceleration (EPA), (2) Duration and predominant frequency of strong ground motion, (3) Period *of motion of the structure, (4) Soil -structure interaction, (5) Total resistance capacity of the system, (6) Redundancies, (7) Inelastic load -deformation behavior, and (8) Modification of damping and effective period as structures behave inelastically. Factors 5 to 8 are included in the structural ductility factor (R) that is used in deriving a reduced. value for design base shear. If further information on seismic design is needed, a site-specific probabilistic seismic analysis should be conducted. The intent of the UBC lateral force requirements is to provide a structural design that will resist collapse to provide reasonable life safety from a major earthquake, but may experience some structural and nonstructural damage. A fundamental tenet of seismic design is that inelastic EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 -16-- File.No.: 08119-01 ' 01-04-716 yielding is allowed to adapt to the seismic demand on the structure. In other words, damage is allowed.. The UBC lateral force requirements should be considered a minimum design. The owner and the designer should evaluate the level of risk and performance that is acceptable. . Performance based criteria could be set in the design. The design engineer has the responsibility to interpret and adapt the principles of seismic behavior and design to each structure using experience and sound judgment. The design engineer should exercise special care so that all . components of the design are all fully met with attention to providing a continuous load path. An adequate quality assurance and control program is urged during project construction to verify that the design plans and good construction practices are followed. This is especially important for sites lying close to the major seismic sources. Pavements �Since no traffic loading were provided by the design engineer or owner, we have assumed traffic r loading for comparative evaluation. The design engineer or owner should decide the appropriate traffic conditions for the pavements. Maintenance of proper drainage is necessary to prolong the service life -of the pavements. Water should not pond on or near paved areas. The following ,. table provides our preliminary recommendations for pavement sections. Final pavement sections . recommendations should be based on design traffic indices and R -value tests conducted during ' grading after actual subgrade soils are exposed. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDED PAVEMENTS SECTIONS R -Value Subgrade Soils - 50 (assumed) Design Method — CALTRANS 1995 - Notes: 1. Asphaltic concrete should be Caltrans, Type B, 1/2 -in. or 3/4 -in. maximum -medium grading and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the 75 -blow Marshall density (ASTM D 1559) or equivalent. . 2. Aggregate base should be Caltrans Class 2 (3/4 in. maximum) and compacted to a minimum of 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum dry, density near its optimum moisture. 3. All pavements should be placed on 18 'inches of moisture -conditioned subgrade, compacted to a minimum of 90% of ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density near its optimum moisture: 4. Portland cementconcrete should have a minimum of 3250 psi compressive strength @ 28 days. - 5. Equivalent Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) may be used instead of Caltrans specifications for asphaltic concrete and aggregate base. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Flexible Pavements Rigid Pavements Asphaltic Aggregate Concrete " Base Portland Aggregate Cement Base Traffic Index Pavement Use Thickness Thickness Concrete Thickness (Assumed) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) 4.0 Auto Parking Areas 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Drive Lanes 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Notes: 1. Asphaltic concrete should be Caltrans, Type B, 1/2 -in. or 3/4 -in. maximum -medium grading and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the 75 -blow Marshall density (ASTM D 1559) or equivalent. . 2. Aggregate base should be Caltrans Class 2 (3/4 in. maximum) and compacted to a minimum of 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum dry, density near its optimum moisture. 3. All pavements should be placed on 18 'inches of moisture -conditioned subgrade, compacted to a minimum of 90% of ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density near its optimum moisture: 4. Portland cementconcrete should have a minimum of 3250 psi compressive strength @ 28 days. - 5. Equivalent Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) may be used instead of Caltrans specifications for asphaltic concrete and aggregate base. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 - 17 - File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 is Section 6 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.1 Uniformity of Conditions and Limitations Our findings and recommendations in this report are based on selected points of field exploration, laboratory testing, and our understanding of the proposed project. Furthermore, our findings and recommendations are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those found at specific exploratory -locations. Variations in soil or groundwater conditions could exist between and beyond the exploration points. The nature and extent of these variations may not become evident until construction. Variations in soil or groundwater may require additional studies, consultation, and possible, revisions to our recommendations. Findings of this report are valid as of the issued date of the report. However, changes in conditions of a property can occur with passage of time whether they are from natural processes. or works of man on this or adjoining properties. In addition, changes in applicable standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a -period of one year. In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of structures are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report are modified or verified in writing. This report is issued with the understanding that the owner, or the owner's representative, has the responsibility to bring the information and recommendations contained herein to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project so that they are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. The owner, or the owner's representative; also has the responsibility to take the -necessary steps to see that the general. contractor and all subcontractors follow such recommendations. It is further understood that the owner or the owner's representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. As the Geotechnical Engineer of Record for this project, Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) has striven to provide our services in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering, practices in this locality at this time. No warranty or guarantee is express or implied.. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and the Client's authorized agents. ESSW should be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design.and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. If ESSW is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. Although available through ESSW, the current 'scope of our services does not include an - environmental assessment, or investigation for the presence or absence of wetlands, hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater or air on, below, or adjacent to the subject property. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST t . April 11, 2001 -18- File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 6.2 Additional Services This report is based on the assumption that an adequate program of client consultation, - construction monitoring, and testing will be performed during the final design and construction phases to check compliance with these recommendations. Maintaining ESSW as the t geotechnical consultant from beginning to end of the project will provide continuity of services. The geotechnical engineering firm ,providing tests and observations. shall assume the responsibility of Geotechnical Engineer of Record, Construction monitoring and testing would be additional services provided by our firm. The r; costs of these services are not included in our present fee arrangements, but can be obtained from our office. The recommended review, tests, and observations include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: a Consultation during the final design stages of the project. • Review of the building and grading plans to observe that recommendations of our report have been properly implemented into the design. • Observation and testing during site preparation, grading and placement of engineered fill as required by UBC Sections 1701 and 3317 or local grading ordinances: • " Consultation as required during construction. �t -000- Appendices as cited are attached and complete this report. " EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST April 11, 2001 _19- File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 REFERENCES Abrahamson, N., and Shedlock, K., editors, 1997, Ground motion attenuation relationships: Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 1, January 1997 special issue, 256 p. American Concrete Institute (ACI), 1996, ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Parts 1 through 5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000, ASCE Standard 7-98, Minimum Design Loads for. Buildings and Other Structures. Blake, B.F., 2000,FRISKSP v. 4.00, A Computer Program for the Probabilistic Estimation of Peak Acceleration and Uniform Hazard Spectra Using 3-D Faults as Earthquake Sources, Users Manual. IBoore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal, T.E., 1993, Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from Western North American Earthquakes: An 'Interim Report; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-509, 15 p. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal, T.E., 1994, Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report, Part 2, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-127: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1997, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117. California Department of Water Resources, 1964, Coachella Valley Investigation, Bulletin No. 108, 146 pp. Department of Defense, 1997, Soil Dynamics and Special Design Aspects, MIL-HDBK-1007/3, superseding NAVFAC DM 7.3. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), 1986, Foundations and Earth Structures, NAVFAC DM 7.02. Envicom Corporation and the County of Riverside Planning Department, 1976, Seismic Safety and Safety Genera_ 1 Plan Elements Technical Report, County of Riverside. Ellsworth, W.L., 1990, "Earthquake History, 1769-1989" in: The San Andreas Fault. System, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1515, 283 p. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1997, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1 — Provisions and Part 2- 1- Commentary. Hart, E.W., 1994, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California: California Division of Mines and �? Geology Special Publication 42, 34 P. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition. International Conference of BuildingOfficials, 2000, International Building Code, 2000 Edition. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST _ April 11, 2001 - 20 -File No.: 08119-01 01-04-716 . Jennings, C.W 1994 Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geological Data Map No. 6, scale 1:750,000. Petersen M.D. Bryant, W.A. Cramer C.H. Cao T. Reic , ry hle, M.S., Frankel, A.D., Letnkaemper, J.J., McCrory, P.A., and Schwarz, D.P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: California Division of Mines and Geology Open -File Report 96-08. Prakash, S., 1982, Soil Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company Proctor, R. J., 1968, Geology of the Desert Hot S . prings Upper Coachella Valley Area, California Division of Mines and Geology, DMG Special Report 94. Reichard E.G. and Mead J.K. 1991 Evaluation of a Groundwater ater Flow and Transport Model of the Upper Coachella Valley, California, U.S.G.S. Open -File Report 91 -4142. - Riverside CountyPlannin Department, 1984 Seismic Safety Element of the Riverside County General Plan, Amended. Rogers, T.H., 1966, Geologic Ma of California - Santa Ana Sheet California Division � P ivision of Mules and Geology Regional Map Series, scale 1:250,000. Sieh, K., Stuiver, M., and Brillinger, D., 1989, A More Precise Chronology of Earthquakes .... q Produced by the San Andreas Fault in Southern California: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 94, No. B1, January 10, 1989, pp. 603-623. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), *1996, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary. Tokimatsu, K, and Seed, H.B., 1987, Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due To Earthquake ' Shaking, ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, August 1987. Van de Kamp, P.C., 1973, Holocene Continental Sedimentation in the Salton Basin, California: A Reconnaissance, Geological Society of America, Vol. 84, March 1973. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 1995, Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994-2024: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 379-439. ' Wallace, R. E., 1990, The San Andreas Fault System, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1515, 283 p. :� EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Calco Bay Commericial 08119-01 , ' Table 1 X Fault Parameters & & Deterministic Estimates of Mean Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) ' Fault Name or Seismic Zone Distance from Site (mi) (km) Fault Type UBC Maximum Magnitude Mmax (Mw) Avg Slip Rate (mm/yr) Avg Return Period (yrs) Fault Length (km) Date of Last Rupture (year) Largest Historic Event >5.5M (year) Mean Site PCA (g) Reference Notes: (1) (2) (3) (4) (2) (2) (2) 5) 6) San.Andreas - Banning Branch 6.1 9.8 SS A 7.1 10 220 98 6.2 1986 0.37 San Andreas - Southern (C V +S B M) 6 9.6 SS A 7:4 24 220 203 c. 1690 0.41 San Andreas - Coachella Valley 6 9.6 SS A • 7.1 25 220 95 c. 1690 0.37 San Andreas - Mission Crk. Branch 6 9.7 SS A 7.1 25 220 95 6.5 1948 0.37 Blue Cut 14 23 SS C 6.8 1 .760 30 - 0.16 San Jacinto (Hot Spgs - Buck Ridge) 17 27 SS C 6.5 2 354 -70 6.3 1937 0.12 Burnt Mountain 17 28 SS B 6 4 0.6 •5000 20 1992 7.3 •1992 0.11 Eureka Peak 18 29 SS B 6.4 0.6 , 5000 19 1992 6.1 1992 0.10 San Andreas - San Bernardino Mtn. 18 29 SS A 7.3 24 433 107 1812 7.0 .1812 0.17 San Jacinto -Anza 21 34 SS A 7.2 12 250 90 1918 6.8 1918 0.14 San Jacinto - Coyote Creek 21 34 SS B 6.8 4 175 40 ( 968 6.5 1968 0.11 Morongo 28 46 . SS C . 6.5 0.6 1170 23' 5.5 1947 0.07 Pinto Mountain 30 48 SS B 7.0 2.5 500 73 0.09 Emerson So. - Copper Mtn. 32 51 SS* B 6.9 0.6 5000 54 -- 0.08 Landers 32 52 SS B • 7.3 0.6 5000 83 1992 7.3 1992 0.10 . Pisgah -Bullion Mtn. -Mesquite Lk 34 55 SS B 7.0 0.6 5000 88 1999 7.1 1999 0.08 San Jacinto - Borrego Mountain 35 57 SS B 6.6 4 175 29 6.5 1942 0.06 San Jacinto -San Jacinto. Valley 36 58 SS B 6.9 12 83 42- 6.8 1899 0.07.. Earthquake Valley 40 64 SS B 6.5 2 351 20 0.05 Brawley Seismic Zone 42 67 SS B 6.4 25 ` 24 42 5.9 1981 0.04 Johnson Valley (Northern) 43 69 SS B 6.7 0.6 5000 36 -- 0.05 ' North Frontal Fault Zone (East) 44 70 DS B 6.7 0.5 1730 27 0.06 Elsinore - Julian. 44 71 SS A 7.1 .5 340 75 0.06 Calico -Hidalgo 45 72 SS B 7.1 0.6 5000_ 95. 0.06 Elsinore - Temecula 47 76 SS B 6.8 5 240 42 . 0.05 - Lenwood-Lockhart-Old Woman Spgs 49 78 SS B 7.3 0.6 5000 149 0.06 Elmore Ranch .50 81 SS B 6.6 -1 225 29 1987 5.9' 1987 0.04 Elsinore -Coyote Mountain 51 83 SS B 6.8 4 625 38 _ 0.04 San Jacinto - Superstition Mountain 54 86 SS B 6.6 5 506 23 c. 1440 -- 0.04 San Jacinto - Superstition Hills 55 88 SS B 6.6 4 2.50 22 1987, 6.5 1987 0.04 North Frontal Fault Zone (West) 56 90 DS B 7.0 1 1310 50 0.05 Helendale - S. Lockhardt 56 91 SS B 7.1 0.6 5000 97 0.05 San Jacinto -San .Bernardino 58 94 SS B 6.7 12 100 35 6.0 1923 0.04 Notes: '1. Jennings (1994) and CDMG (1996) ' 2. CDMG & USGS (1996), SS = Strike -Slip, DS = Dip Slip 3. ICBO (1997), where Type A faults: Mmax > 7 -and slip rate >5 mm/yr &Type C faults: Mmax <6.5 and slip rate < 2 mm/yr 4. CDMG (1996) based on Wells & Coppersmith (1994), Mw = moment magnitude 5. Modified from Ellsworth Catalog (1990) in USGS Professional Paper 1515 _J 6. The estimates of the mean Site PGA are based on the following attenuation relationships: • J f. Average of: (1) 1997 Boore, Joyner & Fumal; (2) 1997 Sadigh et al; (3) 1997 Campbell (mean plus sigma values are about 1.6 times higher) Based on Site Coordinates: 33.707 N Latitude, 116.293 W Longtude and Site Soil Type D < ' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST - 4 0.05 1.2 1.0 Caleo Bay Commericial rn 08119-01 ' Table 2 1.00 2000 International Building Code (IBC) Seismic Parameters 1.00 0.70 0 •ia Seismic Category,D 0.80 0.75 . Table 1613.3(1) ' Site Class Latitude: 0.67 D 33.707 N Table 1615. 1.1 1.00 Longitude: -116.293 W 1.10* 0.55 " Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) Ground Motion 1.20 Short Period Spectral Reponse Ss 1.50 g Figure1615(3) 0.46 1 second Spectral Response S1 0.60 g Figure1615(4) Site Coefficient Fa 1.00, Table 1615:1.2(1) Site Coefficient FV 1.50 Table 1615.1:2(2) 1.70, 0.2 SMS SMI 1.50 g 0.90 g = Fa*SS = F„*Si _._ Design Earthquake Ground Motion 0.0 Short Period Spectral Reponse SDS 1.00 g = 2/3*SMS 1 second Spectral Response SDl 0.60 g = 2/3*SM1 To 0.12 sec = 0.2*SD,/SDS Ts 0.60 sec = Sp,/SDS Period Sa 2000 IBC Equivalent Elastic Static Response Spectrum T (sec) (g) 0.00, 0.40 0.05 1.2 1.0 1.00 . rn 0.20 co 0.30 1.00 0.8 1.00 0.70 0 •ia 0.80 0.75 . a� 0.90 0.67 0.6 1.00 0.60- 1.10* 0.55 " Q 1.20 0.50 IM 1.3Q 0.46 0.4 1.40. 0.43 1.50 0.40 Q. 1.60 0.38 1.70, 0.2 1.80: _._ 0.0 0.05 0.65 0.12 1.00 . 0.20 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.70 0.86 0.80 0.75 . 0.90 0.67 1.00 0.60- 1.10* 0.55 " 1.20 0.50 1.3Q 0.46 1.40. 0.43 1.50 0.40 1.60 0.38 1.70, ''0.35 1.80: 0.33 ' Earth Systems Boring No.:B - 1 Southwest 79-311 B Country Club Drive. Bcmwda Dunes, CA 92201 SILTY SAND: Light olive, loose, damp, fine grained, concrete slab encountered at —4 inches Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development Phone 760) 345-1538 FAX 7601 345 7315 ' 0 17 5 10 15 ' 20 25 30 ' �35 40 45 S0 55 ' Boring No.:B - 1 SILTY SAND: Light olive, loose, damp, fine grained, concrete slab encountered at —4 inches Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 ML 85 Drill Type: Mobile B-61 w/ Autohammer Boring Location: See Figure 2 SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp Logged By: Karl A. Harmon U. . Sample yP Type Penetration _ SM Description of Units Page l of 1 s u Resistance $ u p y •�' v Note: The stratification lines shown represent the a q 3 0 (Blows/6") damp, fine grained, some SP -SM q .. c U approximate boundary between soil and/or rock types Graphic Trend oF" M n g 93 2 damp, fine to very fine grained, lenses of silt and sandy silt and the transition may be gradational. Blow Count Dry Density ' 0 17 5 10 15 ' 20 25 30 ' �35 40 45 S0 55 ' SM SILTY SAND: Light olive, loose, damp, fine grained, concrete slab encountered at —4 inches 7,11,18 ML 85 7 SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp 7, 10, t 1 SM SILTY SAND: Light olive,. medium dense, dry to damp, fine grained, some SP -SM 7, 9, 15 93 2 damp, fine to very fine grained, lenses of silt and sandy silt , 6, 11,12 medium dense to dense, lenses of SP -SM 6, 9, 16 86 2 , 7, 12, 13 Y` SP -SM SAND: Light olive, dense, dry damp, fine to medium grained, some silty sand TOTAL DEPTH: 30.0 feet No Groundwater or Bedrock Encountered Boring No.'B - 2 Earth Systems Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 t� Southwest 79-5I I B Country Club Drive. Bemruda Dimes: CA 92201 Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 Phone 760) .45-1533 FAX (760) 345-73 15 Boring No.'B - 2 Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Calco Bay Commercial Development SP Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 Drill Type: Mobilc B-61 w/ Autohammer Boring Location: See Figure Logged By: Karl A. Harmon w Sample Type Penetration _ j Pa e Description •of Units g 1 of l s u Resistance 8 � vc q R •= v Note: The stratification lines shown represent the q n (Blows/6") rn 2approximate 0 boundary between soil and/or rock types Graphic Trend 0C3 V) l q 'and the transition may be gradational. Blow Count Dry Density SP -SM SAND: Light olive, medium dense, damp, fine j grained 4,8, 10 100 l 4, 5, 7 F ML SANDY SILT: Light olive, medium dense, dry to damp, some silty sand 10 ' _ SM SILTY•SAND: Light olive -gray, medium dense, dry � - i 3, 5, 9 77 1 to damp, fine to very fine grained, some SP -SM - ! 15 5, 7, 7 lenses of silt ' 20 f 5, 10, 12 ' 25 f , 3,5,7 . 30 , ' TOTAL DEPTH: 29.0 feet No Groundwater or Bedrock Encountered 35 40 45 50 55. a Earth Systems 1 ^� Southwest 79-811 B Cowttry Club Drive, Bermuda Dunes, CA 93361 PI 7601345 1"3 F • tone 3 .L\ (760) 34a-, 3I Boring No.:B - 3 ML Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 SM Drill Type: Mobile B-61 w/ Autohammer Boring Location: See Figure 2 Logged By: Karl A. Harmon Sample SILTY SAND: Light olive, loose to medium dense, Types Penetration � "yL� „ o y � Description of Units Page 1 of I B. u Resistance g � q � •o � Note: The stratification lines shown represent the q Y o o (Blows/6") S rn �+`' o approximate boundary between soil and/or rock types Graphic Trend a, C1 Z-1 ML q U and the transition may be gradational. Blow Count Dry Density ML SILT: Light olive, loose, damp SM SILTY SAND: Light olive, loose to medium dense, dry to damp, fine grained, interbedded layers of 7, 9, 11 sandy silt ML SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp to moist, lenses of silty clay 3, 7, l0 79 12 SM SILTY SAND: Olive, medium dense, damp, fine grained, interbedded lenses and layers of silt 5,7,8 ML SANDY SILT: Light olive, medium. dense, damp, some silty sand 4, 7, l2 80 7 SP -SM SAND: Light olive -gray, mediumm dense, dry to damp, fine grained, some SP -SM 4; 7, 10 SM SILTY SAND: Olive, medium dense, damp, fine to very fine grained, some SP -SM 6, 11, 17 , El4, 7, 9 damp to moist ML SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp, some very 4, 10,20 fine sand i SM SILTY SAND: Light olive -brown, medium dense, damp, fine to very fine grained, some'sandy silt 6, 7, 12 SP -SM SAND: Light olive -brown, dense, damp, fine grained 8, 18,30 TOTAL DEPTH: 51.5 feet No Groundwater or Bedrock Encountered Earth Systems Southwest 79 -SI IB Countm Club Drive, Bermuda Dunes. CA 92201 Phone 7601 345-1533 FAN 17601 345-7315 Boring No.:B - 4 SILTY SAND: Light olive -brown, medium dense, Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 Drill Type: Mobile B-61 w/ Autohammer Boring Location: See Figure 2 Logged By: Karl A. Harmon Sample Types Penetration _ ML Description of Units Page I of I n v Resistance SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp, q •y n°, ° Note: 'tile stratification lines shown represent the p Y F o n o (Blows/6") vi 3 L c approximate boundary between soil and/or rock types Graphic Trend c1 En 5, 7, 8 q � j and the transition ma be gradational. Y S>� Blow Count Dry Density SM SILTY SAND: Light olive -brown, medium dense, dry to damp,. fine to very fine grained, lenses of silt 4, 4, 5 ML SILT: Light olive, medium dense, damp, 8, 11, 12 79 3 interbedded with sandy silt and silty sand 5, 7, 8 SM SILTY SAND: Light olive, medium dense, dry to' damp, fine to very fine grained 3, 8, 13 ML 79 5 SANDY SILT: Olive, medium dense, damp, some clayey silt lenses, some silty sand ML SILT: Olive, medium dense, damp -to moist, trace 7, 9, 12 very fine sand 6, 8, 12 108 2 interbedded lenses of sandy silt and silty sand SM x SILTY SAND: Light olive -brown, medium dense, damp, fine to very fine grained 4, 6, 9 TOTAL DEPTH: •34.0 feet No Groundwater or Bedrock Encountered .'0760)345 Earth Systems Boring No.:B - 5 SM Southwest- 79-811 B Country Club Drive, Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development . Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger Phone(760)315-1588 F 731c Boring No.:B - 5 SM Drilling Date: March 8, 2001 Project Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development . Drilling Method: 8" Hollow Stem Auger File Number: 08119-01 Drill Type: Mobile B-61 w/ Autohammer Boring Location: See Figure 2 Logged By: Karl A. Harmon fine grained, lenses of SP -SM, clayey silt layer @ Sample Type Penetration B Description of Units Page 1 of 1 n v" Resistance 6.5. ft. p •= Note: The stratification lines shown represent the 13 S o (Blows/6") ai �,� 2 c approximate boundary between soil and/or rock types Graphic Trend C3 rn 2 8, l5, l5 A V and the transition may be gradational. Y 8m Blow Count Dry Density SM SILTY SAND: Gray; medium dense to dense, dry, fine grained, lenses of SP -SM, clayey silt layer @ 6.5. ft. 8, l5, l5 100 3 ML SILT: Olive -brown, medium dense, damp to moist; interbedded sandy and clayey 4,7,9 ' SM a SILTY SAND: Olive -brown, medium dense, damp, fine to very fine grained, some sandy silt 4, 6, 10 87 2 4, 6, 9 , SP -SM SAND: dense, dry to damp, sample lost 5, 12,20 ML SILT: Light olive, dense, damp, some very fine sand 10, l2, 14 6, 18,26 87 3 Light olive -gray, interbedded sandy and silty, some silty sand ML SANDY SILT: Light olive -gray, dense, damp, some very fine silty sand 6,12,12 - TOTAL DEPTH: 40.0 feet No Groundwater or Bedrock Encountered - k File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 UNIT DENSITIES AND MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM D2937 & D2216 Job Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Q La , Develo mentuinta P .. Unit Moisture USCS Sample Depth Dry Content Group r Location (feet) Density (pcf) (%) Symbol B1 5 85 7 ML •� B1. 15 93 2 SM BI 25 86 S1V1 B2 2.5 100 .2 1 SP -SM B2 12.5 77 1 SM B3 10 79 12 ML B3 20 80 7 ML B3 30 91 3 SM { B3 40 85 6 ML B3 B4 50 104 1 SP -SM .` 7.5 79 3 ML B4 17.5 79 5 ML rB4 27:5 108 2 ML .T B5 5 100. 3 SM , ' B5 ' 15 87 2 • SM B5 35 87 3 'ML r r 1 { +. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D-422 Job Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quinta Sample ID: 131 @ 1-4' Feet Description: Silty Sand: fine, grained with trace gravel (SM) ' Sieve Percent Size Passing 90 1-1/2" 100 70 Y. • 1 100 a. 50 3/4" 100 30 . 1/2" 100 10 .. ' 3/8" 99 0 #4 99 ' #8 98 #16 98 0 /o Gravel: 1 #30 #50 97 :91 % Sand: 74 % Silt: 19 #100 43 ... % Clay (3 micron): 6 #200 25 (Clay content by short hydrometer method) ' 100 90 80 70 Y. • 60 a. 50 c a� a 40 30 . 20 10 ' 0 Y. • 1 100 File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 ,. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D-422 Job Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quinta 60 CLO Sample ID: B3 @ 5' Feet Description: Silty Sand: fine grained (SM) . Sieve Size % Passing By Hydrometer Method: 3" 100 Particle Size % Passing ' 2" 100 53 Micron 30 30 ' 1-1/2" 100. 22 Micron 9 1" 100 ' 13 Micron 7 3/4" 100 7 Micron 5 1/2" 100 5 Micron 4 3/8" 100 3.4 Micron 4 ; - #4 100 2.7 Micron 4 #8 100. ' 1.4 Micron .2 , #16 100, #30 100 %Gravel: 0 #50 .99 % Sand: 61 #100 84 % Silt: 35 #200 39 % Clay (3 micron): 4. 100 90 80 T 70 �,t 60 CLO a 50 40 30 20 '10 ` 0 + r T �,t File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D 2435 & D 5333 Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quinta ' Initial Dry Density: 71.0 pcf B3 @ 10' Feet Initial Moisture, %: 12.2% Silt (ML) Specific Gravity (assumed): 2.67 Ring Sample Initial Void Ratio: 1.347 Hydrocollapse: 3.6% @ 2.0 ksf /o Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram ,2 . I � 1 0 . -1 r. S -3 w -4 Z ° -5 U u -6 L a. -7 -8 -9 -12 . r. S , File No.: 08119-01 April 1. 1, 2001 CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D 2435 & D 5333 ..Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quir to Initial Dry Density: 79.0.pcf B4 @ 17.5' Feet. - Initial Moisture, %: 5.1% „ Sandy Silt (ML) Specific Gravity assumed 2.67 , . h' ( ) Ring Sample Initial Void Ratio: 1.111 Hydrocollapse: 2.2% @ 2.0 ksf % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram � 2 ' 1 -2 - -4 s U u L d -,7 -10 ' -12 File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 iMAXIMUM DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D 1557-91 (Modified) Job Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quinta Procedure Used: A Sample ID: B1 @ 1-4' Feet Preparation Method: Moist Location: Native Rammer Type: Mechanical _ Description: Brown; Silty Sand: fine grained with trace gravel (SM) Sieve Size % Retained Maximum Density: 111 pcf 3/4" 0.0 Optimum Moisture: 11% 3/8" 0.0 #4 0.3 140- i y A _ 135 <----- Zero Air Voids Lines, ' sg =2.65, 2,70, 2,75 130 , I. 125 ' 120 I I • A A 115 .. 110 105 I 100 0 5 10 15 20 25'. .. Moisture Content, percent } - EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST File No.: 08119-01 April 11, 2001 ' SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES Job Name: Caleo Bay Commercial Development, La Quints 'Job No.: 08119-01 Sample ID: B-1 B-2 Sample Depth, feet: 1-4 1-4 P P pH: 7.6 7.7 Resistivity (ohm -cm): 128 175 Chloride (Cl), ppm: 930 910 Sulfate (SOA ppm: 1,013 1,988 Note: Tests performed by Subcontract Laboratory: 4 Soil & Plant Laboratory and Consultants, Inc. 79-607 Country Club Drive. { ` Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Tel: 760 772-7995 General Guidelines for Soil Corrosivity ; Chemical Agent Amount in Soil Degree of Corrosivity Soluble 0 -1000 ppm Low Sulfates 1000 - 2000 ppm Moderate 2000 - 5000 ppm Severe > 5000 ppm Very Severe Resistivity 1-1000 ohm -cm Very Severe 1000-2000 ohm -cm Severe 2000-10,000 ohm -cm Moderate . 10,000+ ohm -cm Low Test Summary/ Footings .Inspected - - - Test : 'No:' .• Location '�✓ Elev. :Dry Density Moist -%. % Relative Compaction . Ref. Max pcf: Moist: 5. Z, 9 112- Z_ 1)4 �7, v 9q, /07.0 5; J 9 �� ,U -7 �2l Comments Field.Tech..,. Super. or Agent -24 hour- notice" requested to schedule.Field Technician.` -hank you for the. opportunity:to be.of service: -,