Loading...
13624 (CSCS)f44 ,P.O. BOX 1504 Building 50-929 WAvHMTON STRES78-105 CALLE ESTADO Aririra—z TLA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 w-1"' , Balphs Grocery t:o. I Mailin Address 1100 W. Artesia Blvd. City Zip Tel. Compton, CA 1 90220 1(310)884-2840 Contractor Moorefield Construction, Inc. Address 1950 Sawtelle. Blvd., Suite -295 CQYS Ange3>tsC: VP 9{ 025 1Te!.310 478-8295 State Lic. & Classif. $ 397892 City Lic. # 3235 Arch., Engr., Factel Axchitect. Designer Atte: Jose Alvarez A�d99W S. SUndy Dr. (e14) 826-2100 CityZip Los Angeles, C13. 90025 State Lic. # LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of`.D�ivjs'io,n/ 3� of � the us,iieess and•Professions Code, d my license i in futll o e nd effect. %-4416AM W I . � t OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5,Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that. he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by 'any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). ❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Buisness and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building , or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of�sale.) ❑ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con- struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policyio`.� Company 11)0`160py is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS'COMPENSATIONINSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less.) I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Name Lender's Address This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives -of this city to enter the above- mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip No. 13624 BUILDING: TYPE CONST. III Nit OCC: GRP. B-2 A.P. Number 763--030---04.4 f Legal Description Project Description Grocery Store ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from `Center Line Side Setback from Propeitjy�line��h�� FINAL DATE Issued by: Date Validated Validation: Sq. Ft. 42' 004 Size No. No. Dw. Stories Units New ❑ Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Estimated Valuation $2,436000.00 PERMIT AMOUNT Pla`n'Chk. Dep. 3,000.00 Plan Chk: *Bal. r 2,572.18 ,,Const. 6,411.50 Mech. 616.00 Electrical ` 951.78 Plumbing 717.00 S.M.I. 243.60 Grading .00 Driveway Enc. .00 Infrastructure 55, 503.00 Ar+t$ in Pnbi1c Places 5,840.00 TOTAL 75,852, 06 72, 852, 06 REMARKS 1 ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from `Center Line Side Setback from Propeitjy�line��h�� FINAL DATE Issued by: Date Validated Validation: CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE NO. ELECTRICAL FEES NO. PLUMBING FEES IST FL. SO. FT. ® $ UNITS SLAB GRADE r 2ND FL. SQ. FT."® ' _ BONDING: YARD SPKLR SYSTEM POR. SQ. FT. ® MOBILEHOME SVC. BAR SINK GAR. SO. FT. @ POWER OUTLET ROOF DRAINS CARP. SQ. FT. GAS (ROUGH) DRAINAGE PIPING WALL SQ. FT. OTHER APPJEQUIP. DRINKING FOUNTAIN SO FT ® TEMP. POLE URINAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION $ GROUT WATER PIPING NOTE: Not to be used as property tax valuation FINAL INSP. FLOOR DRAIN MECHANICAL FEES WATER SYSTEM WATER SOFTENER VENT SYSTEM FAN EVAP.COOL HOOD SIGN WASHER(AUTO)(DISH) APPLIANCE DRYER FINAL INSP. GARBAGE DISPOSAL FURNACE UNIT WALL FLOOR SUSPENDED LAUNDRYTRAY AIR HANDLING UNIT CFM KITCHEN SINK ABSORPTION SYSTEM B.T.U. TEMP USE PERMIT SVC WATER CLOSET COMPRESSOR HP POLE, TEM/PERM LAVATORY HEATING SYSTEM FORCED GRAVITY AMPERES SERV ENT SHOWER BOILER B.T.U. SQ. FT. ®c BATH TUB SQ. FT. ® c WATER HEATER MAX. HEATER OUTPUT, B.T.U. SQ. FT. RESID ® 11/4 c SEWAGE DISPOSAL GAR. FIREWALL SQ.FT.GAR ® 3/ac HOUSE SEWER LATHING GAS PIPING PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE DBL TOTAL FEES MICRO FEE MECH.FEE PL.CK.FEE CONST. FEE ELECT. FEE SMI FEE . PLUMB. FEE STRUCTURE PLUMBING ELECTRICAL HEATING & AIR COND. SOLAR SETBACK GROUND PLUMBING UNDERGROUND A.C. UNIT COLL. AREA SLAB GRADE ROUGH PLUMB. BONDING: HEATING (ROUGH) STORAGE TANK FORMS SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK ROUGH WIRING DUCT WORK ROCK STORAGE FOUND. REINF. — 7 r!/ GAS (ROUGH) METER LOOP HEATING (FINAL) OTHER APPJEQUIP. REINF. STEEL GAS (FINAL) TEMP. POLE GROUT WATER HEATER SERVICE FINAL INSP. BOND BEAM WATER SYSTEM GRADING cu. yd. $ —Plus—X$—=$ LUMBER GR. FINAL INSP. FRAMING FINAL INSP. ROOFING REMARKS: VENTILATION FIRE ZONE ROOFING FIREPLACE SPARK ARRESTOR GAR. FIREWALL LATHING MESH INSULATION/SOUND FINISH GRADING FINAL INSPECTION CERT. OCC. FENCE FINAL INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURES/INITIALS GARDEN WALL FINAL N. W, c c9iz N wiz c�F.: P.O. B Building T 78-.105 CA ` Address W L�CNI I`KrT N ST. f C��CCC- wP'1n(MA'QUINTA, C Owner C© Mailing ' 1i Address �' QCT l�^t /—',�Z �S1� 1��/D Ox 1504 APPLICATION ONLY LLE ESTADO ` ALIFORNIA 92253 \\ BUILDING: TYPE CONST.FQLI_Y OCC. GRP SI�•t t� I , Number City Zip Tel'31 U. a,+(o Legal Description Contractor Pro'ect Description Address City Zip Tel.: State Lic. & Classif. Arch., Engr., 4(E - Designer fit Lic. # ddress Tel. 310 " 11390 s, i3uNo 1DR, 6Z6;- 21 ©o' City P Zip State Lic.,# LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of ttie Business and Professions Code, and my license'is in full force and effect. M•r f, SIGNATURE - DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from .the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5,Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, priortoits issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of, the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing .with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that..he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by 'any applicant :for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). 17 I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as. their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Buisness and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided. that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.) I I I, as owner of. the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con. struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.) 1-1 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that 1 have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company n Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed .if the permitsis for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation . or less.) . I certify that in the performance of the work for-Vwhich this permit is issued;'I shalt. not µ employ any person in any manner so as to become'�subject.to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. . Date Owner �. NOTICE TO APPLICANT., If, after making this Certificate of -Exemption you should become- j subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you, must, it i comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revokee . `••, ?Y i jam- "1 1 ' CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY �•� I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency fordthell performance of the, T ' work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Cddb. �•^" Lender's Name Lender's Address r v % This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration it work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that Ihave read',this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all'"city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives -of this city to enter the above- mentioned property for inspection purposes. n S ,Signature of applicant_ Date. - ""'•t 4 Mailing Address City, State, Zip- i APPLICANT ." •'_•"' f.Y,'a C`�'`3.t�. I I I►IMI v v IJJ-T IJ NE--eia` :,��• i.. -BY: t y �Mn t iirnum�S,etback Distances: • -" Front Setback from Center Llne - ^- Sq. Ft. -Size 4 i , q 2. No Stories No. Dw. Units New9' • Add O Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ C, r FINAL DATE AT-' 4�_ INSPECTOR Issued by:—Date—Permit • ; •Valid d by:t Estimated Valuation PERMIT AMOUNT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical. Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. ' Infrastructure .It , TOTAL , ), - REMARKS ." •'_•"' f.Y,'a C`�'`3.t�. I I I►IMI v v IJJ-T IJ NE--eia` :,��• i.. -BY: t y �Mn t iirnum�S,etback Distances: • -" Front Setback from Center Llne - ^- t �• Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line t i r Side Street Setbac'k'from Center Line " Side Setback from%Koperty Line C, r FINAL DATE AT-' 4�_ INSPECTOR Issued by:—Date—Permit • ; •Valid d by:t Validation: -«tick Y. F� DESERT SANDS.UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ` 82-879 Highway 111 NOTICE: Indio, CA 92201 Document Cannot Be Duplicated_ . 619-775-3500 Date 6/15/94 Type of'Permit La Quinta No. 12885 ' Permit-TF- Log ermit#Log Owner Name Ralphs Grocery Company No. 50929 Street Washington- Street City La Quinta Zip 92253 Study Area 125 APN # Tract # Lot # r Square Footage 142004 Type of Development Commercial No. of units Comments At the present time, the Desert Sands Unified School -District does not collect fees on garages/carports, covered patios/walkways, residential additions under 500 square feet, detached accessory structures or replacement mobilehomes. It has been determined the above-named owner is exempt from paying school fees at this time due to the following reason: EXEMPTION NOT APPLICABLE This certifies that school facility fees imposed'pursuant to Government Code 53080 in the amount of .27 X 42 004 or $11,341.08 have been paid to D.S.U.S.D: for the property listed above and that building permits and/or, Certificates of Occupancy for this square footage in this proposed project may now be issued. Fees Paid By Ralphs Grocery Company Telephone 910-826-2100 Name on the check By Dolores A. Ballesteros . Superintendent Fee collected /exempted by Vickie J. Durrett _ Payment Received signature aack�SL: r0uAAL� Check No. 7028324 Collector: Attach a copy of county or, city plan check application form to district copy for al-Lwaivers. R Embossed Original- Building Dept./Applicant Copy - Applicant/ Receipt Copy - Accounting DIST. #•'-COUNTY,OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY `• DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. 4 PLAN CORRECTION', K'y' `� , V F * •f 4 �. • ,+ , sz '- . �� : j - r - �• • _ -. a . . �'r F .� � ti rte. � 2 Plan Check # ,, ` w r , Date O�, DBA G t c� ,� m ��S rn .��`j- 4: Address ��O�.c�al l� Ing O,. �..- y Plans Submitted by J", e 'r- r. t , I-c� �) c1Y r� :' R Phone Owner 4tb�CAddress il6c�.-(;) S21) C, The plans are now approved subject to the conditions listed below and the attached compliance sheet. I Y rA - n l R `�nv� -YF, ^��J' /� �^ f � r : _ ,t"t. 1. � ( fi x� • , - ` �` <<td�S s' �� r' � • - -� " OV�'C . � F --Q �'; � " ' C•�� � a�—� AMn. -P� -S• I ry r ` 1 ►� -t �O Z^�' \��.0_ cq , )o, " .G a 't _. tea, } 'r'e"• i. 't ...7. •i s�a i 4�' Q (6,01-4 tri ; .( J. .` .+ .' "k f, i'3 1.1 .r:'+• •, 4�. •f��r' T. a'„T 1 ` • 6. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS- Contact the Plan Checker fora Preliminary Inspection when construction is approx- imately 80% complete, with plumbing, rough ventilation, and rough equipment installed. Request for inspection should be made at least five (5) working days in advance. �'wr� k. } °«:;PI A FINAL INSPECTION MUST be made upon completion of ALL work Including finished details. APPROVAL to operate shall ' not be granted, or remodeled areas approved to operate, until the facility has passed the FINAL INSPECTION, and :`APPLICATION TO OPERATE" has been corriple'ted and PERMIT FEES have been paid. ' Requesf for inspectiorrshould be maidat lea five (5) working days In advance. PLANS CHECKED BY /�- Q�' r • �' Phone • tl acknowledge the corrections noted herein rid as indica ' on the plans and agree to incorporate them during construction: _.Signature •' `'. ' ta, - .r a r t, Company .Date �/ `2���n DOH-SAN-178,(Rev 1/92) ` r . ' W -OFFICE ; — ' Y -APPLICANT'S - : P -BLDG. DEPL ,.'• - .%4 } a . r •y "."`"""ru JaR�. ,., �„�.�,.,�ow4jY." ►++•+r-�•-�_ .. �e'1�"''2^. f�`� - � .r.�.L. ,--7 `-'.-Z'^.*`��N..:•.r •';= ,,... '.•.'�.s r'r:r a,,,.. �'A ' � ,_..rH 4j F`. �,�� 'r . *.� �'� r,hw �'�I � /`, •�' r �iy ,.� - ly ^.• ri `'F _ r'�. +•r ,' K_ ..`� �.� - = C` . °-..tR.�..,. ' -�'i . ' � � f • yam:—�---�._ r,+�� ' ' '. ,amu i r _ � L ' - � t •<4.`'. e' r s i d fit/ - .: County ,'Rivr r T" NOVEMBER('3 1994 HARTUNG t DATE: M ` TOM r+ •p�p TOM .i` i{i�M: - .-. „ - - ( /y r­.r.w j r < � •� "� , RALH'S. MARKET - 7-`19.94 with the following�� k. shelves on Noeember , .• * stocking r":'•,. Ralph's can start t.. t conditions: e } Y �'� c�,•� Patrolmen shall. have access to •a telephone a�,i 1,� Provide a'24 hour fir�':wateh. r . h ' r} "• ` to be able to report any fire._ _ is limited to SO people, ��i� ' 4 . ,The building 31 % No ^ smoking is permittedin the building. - ,, 4. - , Cardboard boxes and other trash shall> be removed from the store twice�a�f �dayraiid placed 'in non-combustible containers. iri unobstructed at. all times., 5. Exits; stall Tema rY� 'GEN. -FORM (Ro �-••- t ;�'Y! 3 J t;.� • . - / t 1.. ,,.,',.w.-.G.,.,;�.r.eAe n> 3 ^-4.� >•.i` ice. rti :k , . . �s , `� ,'_ ;.`,.....�.,..•--� -. _ r- :� a h.. «.. •*r..rJ-. 'i :;.1�1%-•;: ir,.,,�ri. !-,, Y s { �'a �+-�*r�`-• ,-.k- ._...i._ --K. � Y "!"""• V . `. . "� • � ' ":, �� < s�' •.�.�� � . '- a , s��tr � � u .. r. - i ",�` � ry r y `r • �" + COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY •.09 -DEPARITvEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH W FOOD FACILITY INSPECTION "REPORT Based on an inspection this -day, the items identified below -are violations in structural or operational requirements which must be corrected by the next routine inspection or such shorter period of time as maybe specified in writing. 41,1" As Failure to comply with any time limits for corrections specified in this notice may result in cessation of your fopd facility operation. The Department of Health appreciates your cooperation. Public health protection is everyone s responsibility. ESTABLISHMENT NAME i r< PHONE DAT TIME IN LOCATION w h DISTRICT j REINSPECTION DATE OWNER T, ACTIVITY & SERVICE CODE C =TF MAILING ADDRESS PERMIT RECEIVED BY TIME OUT,, NO. 'N AME: ITITLE: I [ EXP: 'DESCRIPTION OF ITEM VALUEJ PTS LOST REMARK I.:. FOOD: Approved source 4. No spoilage/contamination 4; Not reused J. Properly stored 2; Properly protected !L- 71 I's (A 1"', d'iprs V 4. -A tall-, - Use of suffites 2, Prop arty labeled 2. TEMPERATURE CONTROL: Poten- t!ally,hazardous food below W. EZ above 1400 F 1; Refer thermometer 1;. r:::a LA It M. o2 -'�W Probe thermometer Z; Food properlyt thawed 1; Frozen food maintained frozen or not refrozen - & 3. PERSONNEL; Foodhandler cards J, Personal hygiene S; Clean clothes 2; Food handling ;; Hair restraint 2; No smokinj _3 Clothing storage gmz FM 4 VQe 4. 'WATER & SEWAGE: 'Hot and cold potable water under pressure 7. Liquid waste disposal 3 Plumbing in good repair 2; No cross connections 2. C -e o' I C '(A to I V\E S. EQUIPMENT Maintained in clean condition 16; Maintained to good repair 1-0; Properly protected i; Approved 3. 6. UTENSILS: Proper washing Proper sanitizing 1; Clean 1; No damage 1; Properly stored Testing spaterlail provided JL.• fih 7. FLOORS: Clean 2; Good repair 2. WALLS at CEILING/WINDOWS J& SCREENS: Clean 2; Good repair 1; Light color 1. r 9: L S. TOILET/DRESSING ROOM & HAND LINKS: Good repair 3; Clean 3;: Self-closing doors 1; Hand cleanser Towels 3, Proper dispensers t Toilet -tissue 1, Hand wash sIgns.L- Properly vented 1; Adequate.L 1. 9. LIGHT & VENTILATION: Adequate 73- Exhaust filters 2; Functioning 2; Fixtures protected 1. 'r tA I t --)- JS k kj.;' 0 1,1 I0. PEST CONTROL: No insects No rodents J* No animals or birds Outer openings protected 2 Self-closingIA. outside doors V F r: coo V t, U. J, C CV ICS 11. REFUSE: Properly stored 3, Containers cover*J-I; Ad0 equate &,.Clean.L Surrounding: clean 1. 4. 12. OPERATION: Toxics labeled and separated !L Living & sleeping quarters separated 1; Signs posted 1; Cleaning equipment storage 1, Proper linen storage 1, Spolls area maintained 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . f Y-13 x.r 42 AP (.s C f. -O t,kP& POINTS POSSIBLE POINTS LOST Z TOTAL SCORE A This facility is required by local Ordinance to display a grade card . In a conspicum place selected by thei Enforcement Officer, The grad! card -ohs" not be concealed and can only be removed by the I�flrorcement Orficer.' GRADES REPRESENT THE FOLLOWING SCORE RANGES: A im 100=909 13 22, 89-80 and d = 79-0.r. RIVERSIDE HEMET PERRIS BANNING PALM SPRINGS INDIO BLYTHE. .'-TEMECULA 358-5172 766-2418 657-0738 ' 849-6794 778-2235 342-8287" 922-81 - 58 '.- 694-5022 I DOH-SM029FEVV941 Orig.— Office, 1 st Copy Owner;, 2nd Copy Office 'Page of _Pages. - _ .. ..-. ... ..__. .. _ .," .tip ., �.�„ � .. .:,rc ;,•�s:�rx:.i �.i: �t�.�, .{.•. tL •, • .. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY ' DEPARTMENT OF' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO SAN. FORM # DATE SUBJECT " ... S .. PERMIT •NO. 77 ADDRESS... " INSPECTOR 1✓' V :" ': REMARKS: 42 Pou•r"" �'�or. � J- � In � e 'reCCP:f "s (so e r C &J06 y - a " o c kc Ct. C f :-t k� ,, �i�f Q,• ' N 1 S �. ci'�' C o �v (a: 44 ern �'n� f'.��•-�e�.."CEiVPG I t _ P2yy�� } DEH -SAN -118 (Rev 5/93) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPT. FIRE PROTECTION JOB CARD THIS INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE AT JOB SITE WITH AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS Owner UDate AV '(Issued) Location P Case No. rinkler Company Irw., derground Static Date Inspector ........... Overh d Static Date Inspector Flushate Inspector Final Date Inspector Fire Main Installer Underground ic Date Inspector al Date Inspector HooCl//Ct Installer Final Date Inspector Alarm Installer . Final:... Date Inspector Tank Installer S, •Final Date Inspector FINAL for OCCUPANCY Inspector Date DO NOT OCCUPY THIS STRUCTURE UNTIL 284-159 (4/90) -AFTER FINAL INSPECTION. ANF& ASSOCUTES Consulting Structural Engineers ANF: 94407 October 20, 1994 The Nadel Partnership Inc. 1990 S. Bundy Dr., 4th Fl. Los Angeles, CA 900251 Attn: Jose Alveraz RE:.Ralphs #195 - Structural Inspection ~ La Quinta,.California.. Dear Jose: On Sept. 22, 1994, our office has conducted an on-site visual inspection for the above mentioned project. No sample was collected or on site testing was performed. To the best of our knowledge, all structural work was done according and conforming to our structural plan documents. Enclosed are photos taken during inspection. Please call this office if further assistance is needed. Very truly yours, ANF & Associates v Norman Hon, SE Princip NH/sh CC: Rich Kirklan -Ci'ty of La Quinta ltr/94407.nh 95(1) Telstar Ave., Suite 101 • Flair Commerce Center • El Monte, CA 91731, • Tel: (818) 448-8182 • Fax: (818) 448-8092 3 (&._%)_,.EARTN, SiYSTEMS-CONSULTANTS- , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA _ 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 w (619) 345-1588 Client Name O, " Client Address f Client Phone DATE JOB NO. PROJECT LOCATION/ CONTRACTOR. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. oat AM at PM PRESENT -AT SITE FIELD REPORT CLIEN�REPRES/NTATIVE IGNATURE TECHNICIANS SIGNATURE® 394:0 -.. i 1 FIELD REPORT CLIEN�REPRES/NTATIVE IGNATURE TECHNICIANS SIGNATURE® 394:0 -.. \� 0 N , 3000 DURA-GLIDETWI 3000 BI -PART WITH TRANSOM ELECTRICAL DURA -GLIDE — 117GV.,, A.C. 15 AMP. SERVICE FOR 1-2 OPERATORS. 20 AMP. SERVICE FOR 3-4 OPERATORS. ELEC. SERVICE TO HEADER BY ELEC. CONTR. I V4 CAULKING NOTE: The glazing material in both fixed and sliding panels of all sliding doors shall comply with the requirements in the performance specifications and methods of test for safety glazing materials used in buildings. ANSI Z 97.1-1984 T 3/4 SECTION 1/2 SECTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION STAN -PAY" 1U2 MOPONSENSOR ' INTERIOR PACKAGE WIDTH STAWGUARD�l THRESHOLD SENSOR NOTE: .7 STAN - 1/4" THK. GLASS RAY (STANDARD) INT. EXT. S� SX I Sx, oo EMERGENCY BREAKOUT ON BOTH NOTE: STAN -RAY CONTROL so DOOR OPENING so EME T SWING OUT PANELS AND SLIDING �DOORS. SHOWN. OTHER CONTROLS —4 1 +' 41/2 AVAILABLE: NOTE: 6'-10IV P!, INTERIOR PANELS CLEAR OPENING 11LI I AVAIL. Cli PLAN EXTERIOR PACKAGE HEIGHT INFORMATION FOR SURFACE APPLICATIONS' INDICATES DIMENSION OF CLEAR OPENING WITH DOORS* BROKEN OUT AND STACKED TO PKG. HT. MASONRYOPG. SLIDING DOOR OPG. ACTUAL WITH . WITH . I CAULKING CLEAR OPG. TRANSOM TRANSOM ALLOWANCE UNDER HEADER 305/16 '11'-01/4" T 1/4 6'-101h" BOTH SIDES 3348 = 105" SECTION 3360 = 129" `INCLUDES 112" THRESHOLD3372 = 153" WHEN PACKAGEIf I - . DEDUCT %" PACKAGE WIDTH INFORMATION FOR RECESSED APPLICATION 7—d DOOR PKG. PKG. WIDTH SLIDING DOOR OPG. (SX) DOOR WIDTH (SO)PANEL WIDTH DOOR TRAVEL MASONRY OPENING CAULKING ALLOWANCE 10-3348 48" 305/16 305/16 24" 10'-01/2" 1/4"/Side 10-3360 12'-0" 60" 365/16" 365/16" 30" 12'-01/2" -1/4"/Side 10-3372 14'-0" 72" 425/16" 425/,6 36" 14'-01/2" 1A."/Side 45/e" 4%" 3348 =321h," 3348 321/2" 3360 = 381/2." 3360 = 381/2". 45" 3372 = 441/2" 3372.,= 441/2" SECTION 3348 = 10'-01/2" SX SX 3360 = 12'-01/2" 3372 = 14'-01h" FIN. FL. DOOR DOOR RECESS FOR FLOOR TRACKS WHEN (SURFACE MTD.) STAN -RAY CONTROLS ARE USED 1/2 DEPTH OF RECESS 1/2"� 41/2 .3-kaR -y�SCALE., -FULL:FIN F R -tSSED EC SECTION STANLEY PACKAGE No. -10 T SO PANEL OD ®The Stanley Works 1991 7:1 ��� 4 a Q. ext � 'LIOF T4 Of 14a(n QUt* "ta., 'utlto n � �P tett tuu _ 1-` This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that -at the. t ' ime of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the City regulating 'building construction -or use.- For the following:-, 50-929 Washington Street BUILDING ADDRESS Grocery Store c 13-624 Use Classifi6ation Bldg. Permit No. Group B2 Type Construction� VN Fire Zone Use Zone CP Owner of -Building Ralphs Grocery .Co. '1100 W.. Artesia Blvd. Address' City Compton, CA 90220 Richard. Kirkland By; Date; November 1994 Building OfficAl POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE Expires December 17, 1994 f' -,?SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT City of Ly//.� ( for (date) L� ' v�-(� I Ll P \"r Project Name/Address:'- Inspection Type(s)/Coverage:. �' %A. c r A- V--']"Continuous fit- s [ ✓ ] Continuous [ ] Periodic Time Beginning Inspection: •• C, 0 • N'L Time Ending Inspection: o o - A Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: ' List Tests Made: List Items Requiring Correction, Corrections of Previously Listed Items and Previously Listed Uncorrected Items: s List Changes to Approved Plans Authorized by Architect or Engineer: 4- ' .. .` . 41 Comments: To the best of wledge, work' spec d was i ordance with the building department approved design drawings, -. specification and p "w! abl or sh' pro ' io of the U.B.C. except as noted above. Signed: Date: as Print Full Name: le, in a 1. D., Number: N9 (This report to remain at jobsite with the contractor for review by the building department's inspector upon request.) '-• � T�•_ ' ' 22 a !' - 1 j SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT 9 City of d-�� v :...�� for (date) N ` / q Project Name/Address: 1Cc<�.r�CIS Mc, rlC- fi , 'Inspection Tnx(s)/Coverage:_ ALL e, [ V11"Continuous [ ' ] Periodic Time Beginning Inspection: S = d l/►il Time Ending Inspection: Z C> a AA Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: List Tests Made: 7777 1 List Items, Requiring Correction, Corrections of Previously Listed Items and Previously Listed Uncorrected Items: Comments: l To the best pfgyowledge, wons cted w ccordance with the building department approved design drawings, specifica ns ap ica wo an -p pf isi s of the U.B.C:_except as noted above. - Signed: Date: Print Full Name: I.D. Number: NA -22? 3 (This report to remain at jobsite with the contractor for review by the building department's inspector upon request.) L SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT' City of. �c c,:.for (date) Project Name/Address: '•n �h� rn c P t Inspection Type(s)/Coverage:.— Gs . [tinuous [ ] Periodic Time Beginning Inspection: S, <OcTime Ending Inspection: --t, o Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: v List Items -Requiring Correction, Corrections of Previously Listed Items and Previously Listed Uncorrected Items: List Changes to Approved Plans Authorized by Architect or Engineer:' Comments: To the bes my wledge, wo m pect was in dance with the building department approved design drawings, specific 'ons a is wor , ans ' provis ns the U.B.C. except as noted above. Signed: Date: _"_ D Print Full Name: a I. D. Number: fv (This report to remain at jobsite with the contractor for review by the building department's inspector upon request.) SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT To the be of my ow dge, ork ins ted W4 in accorda.%ce with the building department approved design drawings, specific tion ap cable orkm s ' pro isions of a B.C. except as noted above. —� ) c� Signed: Date: -17 / Print Full Name: e _ I. D. Number: (This report to remain at jobsitc with the contractor for review by the bdildirig departineiiEs inspector upon request) SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT To the best of my knowledge, work inspected was in accordance with the building department approved design drawings, specificati a plicable workm provision of the U.B.C. except as noted above. Signed: e -Date: Print Full Name: ' I.D. Number: (This report to rem ' at jo site , ith the contractor or reviewby the building departtnetit's inspector upon request.) Comments: r To the be of my kn e , wo ns t as in Icor icew' the building department approved design drawings, - specific tions appl• le w ans provi ns of a C. except as noted above. l / Signed: Date: ? 6 r g 7 Print Full Name: G e / I: D. Number: AW 3 (This report to remain at jobsite with the.contractor for review by.the building departmen's inspector upon request..): SPECIAL,INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT City of Cil " ; tiA for (date) . Project Name/Address: 1`�•� �n / I c. C P -� = , ' . Inspection Types)/Coverage:. A 5 0 VNr / [ Continuous [ ] Periodic Time Beginning Inspection:-' e o . f" - Time Ending Inspection: .' o o Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: G, / CJL 1 - c 1 t C.. List Tests Made: List Items Requiring Correction, Corrections of Previously Listed Items and Previously Listed Uncorrected Items: List Changes to Approved Plans Authorized by Architect or Engineer: - To the best owledge, work' spected w in a r e with the building department approved design drawings, specific 'ons d lica wo p visio of th B.C. except as noted above. Sign Date: 7 7— Print q y Print Full Name: I.D.-Number: ��� " Z2Z 3 (This report to remain at jobsite with the contractor for review by the building department's inspector upon request.) ,. SPECIAL INSPECTOR DAILY REPORT (J� c� L City of CSL: i ..c� for (date) " til o? r / / Project Name/Address 2�� :n h S I V \ G. ( ICP Inspection Type(s)/Coverage:. G S n J^ r [Continuous r�,� [ ] Periodic Time Beginning Inspection: = t� 0 ! - Time Ending Inspection: d 0 Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: List Tests Made: List Items -Requiring Correction, Corrections of Previously Listed Items and Previously Listed Uncorrected Items: List Changes to Approved Plans Authorized by ;Architect or Engineer: i To the of my owl dge, work ' spected as in acc a with the building department approved design drawings, specif'�i�q a ca or s 'p ovision of B.C. except as noted above. CSign dDate: ,�— �l "q 7 Print Full Name: 6 P _ r j I.D. Number: �q (This report to remain at jobsite with the contractor for review by the building department's inspector upon request.) Table - ,,Of Contents for Title 24 ' Report Cover. Page .. .. 1 .Table of'Contents.. ..... ... .. 2 , Form ENV -1 Envelope Certificate of'Compliance .. ... 3 Form ENV -2 EnvelopeSummary.' ... ... .... 5 Form ENV -3 Construction Assemblies. . ... .:. .... .. .. 9 Form,MECH-1 Mechanical Certificate "of 'Compliance ..,.. .... 14 Form, MECH-2• Mechanical' Summary ..._. ,.... .. ..... 17 Form.MECH—I Mechanical.Equipment Summary; ..... .. .. ... 20 Form 14ECH-4 Mechanical'Ventilation .. .. 21 HVAC Zone & Space Loads -,Summary ... .. 22 .CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1`of'2). ENV -1 page 3 of 27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET:NO..195 Date: 4/23/1994 :+ Address: NWC Washington and'Calle Tampa Palm'Springs`, California Building Permit No Envelope Designer•: THE NADEL PARTNERSHIP"INC. Checked by / Date l. Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY 24 User 2299 GENERAL INFORMATION Date�of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 35894 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 15 'Phase of,Construction • O New Construction 4 O Addition O Alteration ,Method of-Envelope:Compliance: Prescriptive --Overall Envelope STATEMENT -OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance ' specifications needed td*comply with Title 24, Part 6, Chapter•1 and Title ,'20,.�Chapter.2, Subchapter 4, Article l of the California Code of-Regula— ,tions.. This certificate applies only to building.envelope requirements.. The Principal Envelope Designer hereby.certifies.that the proposed build- ing design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent. with the other compliance forms and=worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the envelope requirements contained in'sections'110;. 116 through 118, and 143 or•149._of Title 24, . Part 6; Chapter 1. Please check one: ' q ,L hereby.affirm that I•am eligible'under the provisions of Division 3 .of the Business and Professions Code ta,sign this document as the person responsible'for its preparation;,and.that I am,a civil -engineer or architect O I affirm that'I am eligible under the exemption to'Divison 3 of the Business and.Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of'the Business and Professions Code to sign this doeument:as.the person responsible for -its preparation;.and that I am a.licensed contractor preparing docu— ments for work that.I have"contracted to perform.' O I affirm that Iam eligible under the exemption to DIivision 3 of the Business and`Professions.Code by Section :of the y` Code to sign,this•'document as the person responsible for its preparation;•and•.f6r the f61lo'wing.reason: ' PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER . THE NADEL PARTNERSHIP INC., (310) 826.-2100 { (Signature) (Lic. #) (Date) ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate locaton'on-plans of Note Block for -Mandatory Measures:' + . ' CERTIFICATE ''OF ' COMPLIANCE '.(part' 2 [ of 2.* . " r ENV—1 , . page• • 4 • of 27. - Project Name:: RALPHS.MARKET NO. 195 - Date; 4/23/1994 Documentation:. +ADVANCED TITLE 24 ,, ' ,�=` . COM'PLY' 24 User 2299 . OPAQUE,.SURFACES . Const . ; r Note -to'. t Assembly Name Type_ Location/.Comments Field R-11 Stucco Wall Wood r R—O Wall* Interior' -Wood. `I 811,CMU Wall/.Furred (1)" Wood€ 8"RCMU Wall/Furred' (2) Wood R=30* B/U Roof/T-Bar ' Wood FENESTRATION: 'Frame Orient . • Panes Exterior `Shade . OH ! "Type. ,.Type , ,dlazi'ng Right ,(NE) -I - Metal- None_ x Y 1. Single'•Clear Def atilt '(N) ' Front .(E) 1 Metal .None Y- .Single Clear Default (N) Front, ,(SE) 1', Metal ,None - ,,'. }~ Y. "'Single Clear ­Def ault.(N) Skylight 2 Metal None,' -; { _ % N -Double Acrylic . Skylight . a �.:'•rte - ' .. .. e .� _ 3. ry _�. i y. ♦.. Nab - - f.- VVV .. • • f 5. • w . • .l - � Yea I r ` .. .. •. �y. ,^ •,1 , 't. ♦, { ' -♦�•" -, ... -•r.' ter.. .♦'•.�. �.. r'. • y r- ' OVERALL ENVELOPE -METHOD Part 1 of 4 ENV -2 page 5 of 27. Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO: i95• bate: 4./23/1994 Documentation:. ADVANCED TITLE 24. COMPLY 24 .User 2299- . WINDOW "AREA TEST' A. Display,Perimeter 0.0 ft X 6 ft = 0.0 sf-Display Area B. Gross -Exterior Wall•_Area 15897.0 sf X,0.40'= •6358.8 sf 40% Area T C:'Gr.oss Exterior Wal 1 Area 15,897.,0,sf X 0..10 = 1589.7 sf'Min Std Area D. Enter Larger of A or".B �. 6358.8 sf Max,Std Area E. ,Enter Proposed, Window .Area 796.0 sf ' Proposed Area If, E is greater than D.;or less than C, proceed to the next calculation for window - area 'add ustment . .I f not;. go'. to part` 2 of 4. 1. If E is. .greater- than D: - ..' Window D.•Maximum.Standard Area E. Proposed Area Adjustment'Factor N/A' / N/A = NSA 2.. If E is'.less than C: f ' Window * C. Minimum.Standard'Area E: Proposed.Area Adjustment Factor 1589.7 796.0 _ •1.9971 SKYLIGHT-AREA•TEST Atrium'Height R r - 0.0 ft f!Height < 55 ft If Height .>= 55 ft Standard 5% 1 Standard =.10% ` -A. Gross Ekterior 'Roof Area ;.•.35894.0- sf :X 0.05 1794.7. sf Standard Area B. Enter Proposed•Skyl ght Area- •1536.0 sf'•Proposed Area '-If'the Proposed.Skylight Area: is,greater-than the Standard Skylight Area, proceed to`the,next calculation for the skylight area adjustment.-If'not got .to part 2 of 4. . ' 1. If.'Proposed Skylight Area > Standard Skylight Area: Skylight Standard Skylight Area Proposed�Skylight Area Adjustment Factor N/A / N/A • = N/A - OVERALL. ENVELOPE METHOD Part 2 of 4 ENV -2 page,6 of 27 _ Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. .195. Date: 4/23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY 24 User 229.9 OVERALL HEAT LOSS PROPOSED Adj. STANDARD Assembly.Name Area HC _-U-Val UxA Area U -Val' Ux& 8" CMU Wall/Furred (1) 3222.0 17.4 0.354 1142.0 2707.5 0.400, 1083.0 8" CMU Wall/Furred (2) 3288.0- 17.2 0:.364 1195.:6. 3288.0 0.400 1315.2 R70 Wall/Interior 2904-.0 1.6. 0.361 1049.7 2904.0 0.084 24.3.9 8" CMU, Wall/Furred (2), 3288.0 17.2-,-0.364 1195.6 3288.10 0.400- 1315.2 R=,11 .Stucco Wall 52,2. 0 2.-9 0-. 098 51.1 522.0 0.084 43 : 8 R-11 Stucco Wall- 105.0. 2.9 0.09.8 10.3 105.0 .0.084 8.8 R-11 Stucco Wall 105.0 2,.9 0.098 10.3 105.0 0.084 .8.8 R -3Q BYU Roof%T-Bar 32814.0 2,0 -0.-03.2 1040:8.32814.0 0.057 1870.4 Single Clear Default(N) '516.0 NJA 1..2.50 645.0 .1030.5 0.720 742.0 Single Clear Default(N) .140.A N/A 1.250 175-.0 279.6 0.720 201.3 Single Clear Default(N) 1.40•.0 N/A 1.250.; 175.0 279.6 0.720. 201.3 Double Acryliq Skylight 153.6.•0, N/A 0.82;0 1259.5. 1536.0 0.8:50 1305.6 8" CMU Wall./.Furred (1) 194.,0- 17.4 0.354 68.'8: 194.0 0.40.0 77.6. . R=O Wall/Interior 3;6-7.-O,. 1.6 : ;0.361 '132..7 3.6.7.0 0-.0.84 30.8 8" CMU Wall/Furred (1)_ 212.0 17.4 0.354 75..1 212.0 0.400 84.8 R -O Wall/Interior 86.:0. 1..6. 0.361 31.1 86.0 0.084 -7.2- R=3.0 BJU Roof /T -Bar 998:0 2..0 0.032 31.7. 9.98.0 0.057' 56.9 R -O Wall/Inter.ior 137.0 1.6< 0.361 491.5 137.-0 0.084- 11.5 R -O Wall/Interior 32-4..0 1.60.361 117.1, 324.0 0.084 -27.2 R-0 Wald/ -Interior 137.0• 1.6 0.361 49.5' 137.0 0.084 11.5 R._30 B/U Roof/T-Bar 546.0' 2;0 0.032 17.3 546.0 0..057 31.1 Total 8597.2 Total 8650-.4 **,OVERALL HEAT LOSS COMPLIES' PROPOSED UA <= STANDARD UA ** OVERALL ENVELOPE METHOD- Part 3 of 4 ENV-2 page 7 of 27 Project `Name: RALP.HS\ MARKET 'NO. 195' Date: 4/23./199,4 ". Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24. COMPLY 24 User 2299 OVERALL HEAT GAIN` PROPOSED,.. STANDARD :Glazing;WF. Area'. SC H- V OHF Total Area. RSHG Total East 1.08 516.0 0-.94 -9; 0 " 9.0 6.43 -2'25.3,,. 1030..5 0.57 634.4 East 1•.-08 140.0-:0.,94- 9'.0.13'-0-,0.53, 75.*4 2'79.6 0". 57, 172.1 North 0.677 140.0'0.94 .9.0 13,0 0.81 71.6 279.:6 0.88 164.8 Skylight 2.45 15-36.0 0.,63 23:7.0`..8 1536.0 0.50 1881.6 Total .2743.1 Total 2852.9 **,OV'ERALL HEAT GAIN-COMPLIES PROPOSED HG <_'STANDARD HG ** OVERALL ENVELOPE.METHOD Part 4 of 4 ENV -2 page 8 of 27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 Date: 4/23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24. COMPLY'24 User 2299 Window Area,Adjustment'Calculations Adjusted Gross Door Window Adjust .Window Wall Wall"Name' Dir ..Area.Area Area.,, Factor Area Area Frond E 3738.0 51-6.,0 1.9971 1030.5 2707.5 FLeft- E-- 245.:0 140.,D 1.9971 279'46'_ =34.6 Lefty S 3288-.0 0:0 1.9971 0_.0 3288:0 Back2 W 2904.0 0.0 1.9971 0.0 2904.0, - Rightl.. W,', 32818.0 . G.0 1.9971 0.0 3288.0 FRightl N° 245.0`. 140'.0. 1,9971 279.6 -34.6 Front2 E 522.0' 00 1.9971 0.0 522.0 FLeft2 E 105.0 0..0 1..9971 0.0 105.0. 'FRight2 N'. 105.'0 0'0. 1,9971 0.0 105.0 Frontl E .194.'0 0.'0 1:9971 0.0 194.0 Front2_; E:. 367;0 0.:0,: 1.9971 0.0 367.0 Lefts S_ 212.0 0.0' 1'..997.1_" '0.0 212.0 Right2` . ' N 86.0: 0. .0 1.99710._0 86.0 Left2 S. 137.0 0.0. 1..9971 0.0 -137.0 Back2 W:., 324.0 %0`.',0 ., 1.9.971 0.0 324.0 Right2 N 137.,0 0.0 1.997"1 0..0" 137.0 TOTALS. 15.897.0 0.0 796.0 1589.7 14307.3 Skylight Area Adjustment Calculations. Adjusted Gross.:. SkyYt Adjust Skylt Roof ,Roof Name Dir Area Area Factor Area Area R=19 Roof H 34350.0 .1536-..0 • 1.0000 1536.0 32814. 0 R-19 Roof H 998:.0 0".0 1.0000 0.0 998.0 R-19 Roof H: 546:-.-0.. 0.'0 1,0000 0,.0 .546.0 TOTALS 35894`:0 1536.0 1536.0 34358.0 PROPOSE D-'CONSTRUCT ION.,ASSEMBLY ENV-3 _ page 9-of 27 Project *Name:.,`RALPHS ` MARKET-VO., 1.95 • Date : , 4/,23/1994 = Documentation: ADVANCED•'TITLE'24`': COMPLY 24 User.2299 •` COMPONENT DESCRIPTION —Assembly, Name: R-11 Stucco. Wall` "Assembly Type: Wali Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) ' ,, _• Framing. Material: Wood, , • fi4. �. x• ` - Framin .S acin ;�� O.C. g, P g• ; ' µFraming Percents 15.,0'$ • Absorptivity 0.70 ., .,Sketch.of Construction Assembly.-..'' Roughness:'Stucco,. Wood Shingles ASSEMBLY'U=VALUE=. '. y.•' ,t Constructions°tComp,onents, •�.�, Th R-Value a Fr (in)' Cavity Frame Outside Air Film,,. 0.17 0.17 ' 1. Stucco - 0:875 0.17 0'.17 2 : Membrane, Vapor=Permeable Felt ' .. 0.. 010 ' R0.06 0.06 ' 3. Insulation, Mineral Fiber, R-11; }- * 3.560 11..00 3.46 4• Gypsum,or Plaster Board .0.500 ' 0.45 0.'45 5. 7. 9. •Inside Air Filmt *; ^^. q.68 0.68 . _} r Unadjusted R—Values 12.'53 5.00 _ ADJUSTMENT • FOR. . FRAMING'' : • _, (1 /`12.53),x, (0.8,5 + (1 ./ 5..0.0) .x (0.15)-,. = 0.098 s TOTAL•U-VALUE = '01098 •• �' r: _ ' y; ' . x TOTAL R- fi VALUE _ • 10`.2"2 " Weight: .. ." 12 3 lb/sgft z dipacilty:..1, 2.87 ` ...,:Heat } of ;.' x PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV -3, page 10 of 27 J Project.Name: RALPHS MARKET NO..195 Date:,, 4/23/1994 Documentation; ADVANCED TITLE=24+ r• COMPLY 24 User 2299 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION ,;- AssemblyName.:' R-0 Wall/Interior Assembly,Type: Wall Assembly - Tilt: '90 deg (Vertical).',' `-- # ' .. '►* w Framing"Haterial: 'Wood ' Framing -Spacing:-, " Framing'Percerit: 12.0,$ n* r 4 •� Absorptivity �0. T0. ,-,Sketch-of Construction Assembly— 'Roughness: Smooth Piaster,: Metal • ASSEMBLY ,U -VALUE ;� f R=Value.. - Construction. -Components .Frl, (in") -Cavity Frame - Outside• Air' Film _ 4.. 0.. 17, 0.17 1. ,Gypsum or Plaster Board, ', 3 ' 0.50,0 ' 0.45 0.45 2..Air-Space t * 3:500 0.85 3.46- 3,.: Gypsum,'or. Plaster Board., 0.500 0.'45 0.45 4. -6. '7• 9 • M1 Inside Air Film 0.68 0.68 ' Unadjusted R=Values 2.60' y' 5.21 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING r (1 %% <2.60) X. '(0.88)• + ('l.-. 5.21), x: (•0.12)' 0.;361 TO_ TAL U -r -VALUE _ 0.36-1 i - TOTAL R ­ VALUE' 2'.77 Weight. 5.4 1'b/sgft Heat Capacity: 1.56. , ,PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY ENV. -3 page 11. of 27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. '195 Date: 4/23/1994 Documentat on;.ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY 24 User 2299 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION ,, Assembly,.Name:,8" CMU Wall/Furred (1) Assembly Type;.Wa11,, Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical) Fra' ng.Material: Wood ,Framing Spacing c: n O.C. Framing Percent:. 10.0 ..Absorptivity:: 0.70 Sketchy -6i Construction Assembly.:. Roughness: Concrete, Asph.. Shingles ASSEMBLY Ur; -,VALUE Th R—Value ` Construction,Components _- ' :' . Fr (in) ., Cavity. Frame Outside Air* Film 0.17 0:17 1. Conc.Block; Normal Weight -, :,Cone_ ;Filled 8!.000 0.60 0.60 2.,Air Space* 1.500 0.-87 1:49 3. Gypsum or. Plaster Board 0.500 0.45. 0.45 -4. ` 5. 7. ; 9, Inside.Air Film 0,.68 0.68 Unadjusted R=Values 2:77 3.38, ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING. - RAMING/,2.77) ['2.77): x ('0..90), +. (1. / 3.38) x (0:10) _ 0;..354= TOTAL U .VALUE = 0.354 ' TOTAL R -VALUE =. 2.82 Weight : 85.9,lb:%sgft Heat Capacity : -17'.,38 PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION-ASSEMBLY ENV-3 page 12, of .27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO: 195 '.Date:. 4/23/1994 Documentations ADVANCED TITLE 24. COMPLY 24 User '2299 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Assembly Name* 8" CMU Wall/Furred- -(2) , Assembly Type:' Wall Assembly Tilt: 90 deg (Vertical).- Framing.Material: Wood,,'. Framing Spacing:,.":O.C: Framing Percent:'100 $ Absorptivity... .6-70 Sketch of Construction Assembly Roughness Concrete;; Asph. Shingles ASSEMBLY U=VALUE. _ Th R-Value Construction Components Fr (in.) ,Cavity Frame Outside:Air Film- 0.17 0.17 1`,. Conc Block,. ;Normal Weight; >' Conc "Filled. 8:000 0.60 0.60 2. Air Space 24.. 000 0.85. 0.85 3. Gypsum-or Plaster Board. 0..500 0.45. 0..45 4.. 5 7 - $ 9. Inside Air.Film 0.68. 0.68 Unadjusted R= Values 2.75 2.75 ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING , (11 / -2.75), x(0.-9'0) +:.(1 ../ 2;.75),. x (0..10) _; 0.36.4` TOTAL,U-VALUE = 0.364 TOTAL R-VALUE _ 2.75 Weight,:-85,.4 lb/sgft Heat Capacity:'17.21 �= ' PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION -,ASSEMBLY' :_ -' ENV=3 page 13 of 27 Project Namet'RALPHS MARKET NO:' 19.5 -. pate: 4/23/1994 Documentation':;ADVANCED TITLE'24 ,. COMPLY 24 User 2299' COMPONENT DESCRIPTION Assembly Name:.R-30 B/U Roof/T-Bar k - • • • Assembly Type: -Roof Assembly' Tilt: - 6 deg (Horizontal'Roof Framing,Mate_rial: Wood ' •; t. Framing: Spacing: _,�� O.C. Framing;Pereent: :5.0 Absorptivity: 0.70 Sketch of.Construction-Assembly'' Roughness., Concrete--Asph. Shirigles� > , ' ASSEMBLY, ,U-VALUEv Construction `' Th. R—Value Components',,: ,� Fr (in) Cavity Frame :Outside Air Film"70:17 0.17 • � - .' 1. Roofing; Built -Up 0.375 0.33 0.33 ` 2. Membrane,"Vapor—Permeable Felt ,. `0.010 0.0b' 0.06 3 Plywood ,,.., ; . .., '' ., 0.500'. 0.62 r 0.62• -'r '4. Insulation,• Mineral Fiber, R=30 .9.250 30.00 9.16 5. -Air Space * 6.0"00 0'! 80 0.80 '6.Acoustical Tile, Interior --'Finish- ;; 0.5.00 1.43 1.43. r # • Inside 'Air Film,'Y ;. 0.61 0.61 ` _y! h Unadjusted-R—Values, 34.02 R 13.18 t ADJUSTMENT FOR FRAMING, ' '(i /.34•.02)' x (0.95) :+'(1: /13-:18)::x•'(0.05) �- _ .� 0.032 _ TOTAL �U- VALUE 0.032 4.. 'TOTAL R—VALUE = 31.5.3 Wleight:. +.. 6.1 lb/sgft�. • _ Heat .,Capacity,:.,-' 2. '0D CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (.part l of 3) MECH-1 page 14 of 27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 Date: 4/23/1994 Address: NWC Washington and Calle Tampa - Palm Springs, California' Building Permit No Mechanical Designer: G.H.V. REFRIGERATION'INC., _ Checked'by / Date Documentation: ADVANCED`TITLE 24. • COMPLY -24 User 2299 - GENERAL INFORMATION - Date of Plans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 35894 sf Building Type"; Nonresidential Climate Zone: 15 Phase of Construction: l New.'Construction O Addition O Alteration Method of Mechanical Compliance: Prescriptive- Proof'of Envelope;ComWance: O Previous'Permit O Compliance Attached STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE , This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and.performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24,,Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title .20,.Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California.Code of Regula— tions. This certificate applies only to building•mechanical'requirements. The Principal Mechanical Designer hereby certifies that the -proposed build— ing design represented iri this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms :and worksheets, with.the-specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the mechanical requirements contained. in -sections 110 through 115, 120 through'124, 140 through 142,,144 and 145. ' -Please check one: As I hereby'affirm,that I .am eligible under the provisions of Division,3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this'document as the " person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil"engineer ,'mechanical -engineer or.archite.ct. O I. affirm' that I', am' eligible under the exemption to -Division . 3, of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the.Business and Professions':Code to.sign this document as the•person responsible for its preparation; and that.I am'a licensed contractor preparing docu— ments for work that I have'contracted to perform. y O I affirm that`I.am eligible -under -the exemption to Division3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section of the Code to sign this-document.as the person responsible for its ^' preparation; and for the following reason: 'PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL DESIGNER" G.H.V. REFRIGERATION INC. 4I� `t :YY (714)'577-39.50, (Sig at e) (Lic. 4) (Date) 1KECHANICAL.MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate -location on ,plans of Note Block,for Mandatory Measures: . • it t w CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 3) .. MECH-1 page•15 of 27 Project Name ,RALPHS MARKET NO... 195J�Date:'4[23/1094 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 _ COMPLY 24 User 2299 SYSTEM 'FEATURES' ` Note to ♦ - , Field '-.Zone Name Sales Area Mezzanine Offices • -Time-,Control Setback'Contro.l Both' Both # of Isolation Zones n/a " -HP-Thermostat '` n/a Yes ' Electric Heat' V a J 3 .'0 KW Fan-Control + Constant- Volume Constant Volume •VAV Min Position n/a - n/a • Simul. Heat/Cool, n/a�.E n/a ' Heat•Supply Reset` 'Constant Temp d: Constant-Temp Cool Supply Reset Constant-.'Temp. Constant.Temp Ventilation OA Damper Control , Economizer Type., No Economizer No Economizer ..Outdoor Air CFM 8931 a, 150 r Heat Equip Type '• Gas Furnace. Heat Pump Make &'Model No. -.Reznor HCX-400- EMI WCX-12D Cool.Equip Type ,DX -DX _ Make and Model Frigid.Coil FAH-228 Zone Name Empioyee Lounge Time Control Setback Control Botha Vof Isolation Zonesn/a HP Thermostat , Yes,- es, .Electric .Electric Heat 3.0 KW Fan.Control' 'Constant Volume VAVMin Position n/a .: `'Simul'. Heat/Cool n/a, f Heat Supply Reset Constant Temp' Cool 'Supply _Reset C6nstaht:Temp r - Venti'lation *, OA Damper•Control Economizer'Type.. No Economizer ' Outdoor.Air CFM 82 ' Heat Equip Type Heat Pump {. Make &,Model- No'. _ McQuay TSH-041E -Cool.Equip Type DX .. , .-Make-and Mode l 'Code Tables .Time 'Control` Ventilation OA.Damper S:Prog Switch '•.B:Air=Balance A:Auto O:Qc,e4•Sensor• C:OA Cert. G:Gravity ; M:Man Timer M:OA'Measure • D:Demand Cont N:Natural - - CERTIFICATE n OF, `COMPLIANCE' (part'3 of 3) MECH-1 page 16 of -2.7 Proj'ect , Name :,- RALPHS MARKET NO. 19 .5 ~ 4/21/1994 ' .Documentation: 'ADVANCED TITLE 24, . ,' J.Dat6: .' COMPLY 24 "User 2299. • DUCT, `INSULATION ,r. ` - '� y Duct. Tape Insul. Note to. System Name Type„ 'Duct Location Allowed. R -Val Field e _ Reznor_ •HCX=400 ' Heating 'Ducts, in Attic Y /'„NJ 4.2 �- Cooling `•Ducts in Attic Y /.. N 4.2 EMI WCX=1'2D' HeatinglFan./-,No •Ducting Y / N 4.2 Cooling Fan / No' Ducting Y / N . 4.2 McQuay TSH -041E,,-' Heating Ducts in Attic -Y /-N 4.2 ;Co.olinq, Ducts ''in Attic- Y / N 4.2 fes` •', '- . _ F •.. R•t - +. 1 .PIPE INSULATION ,• �. Insult'• ;° ' Note to System Name. Pipe Type r Required its Field .• Domestic Hot =Water ! .. Y-/ 'N.. ! `Reznor HCX-400 Y / N . t EMI 'WCX-'12D Y -N. 'McQuay..TSH-U4lE *” *. Y,,/,N 'NOTES TO'FIELD:- For.Building Department Use Only • S - y • ['1 _ � - _ « .. ' fit'•. - MECHANICA°L SIZING -AND -FAN° -POWER MECH-2 page 17 of 27 Project'Name:.RALPHS MARKET NO: 195 Date: 4/23/1994 Documentations ADVANCED TITLE.24 COMPLY 24 User 2299 ` SIZING..AND,EQUIPMENT.SELECTION ' HVAC Zone `Name:. Sales Area Heating System°.Name:, Reznor HCX-400 Cooling System Name: Frigid Coil.,FAH-228 System, Multiplier:. 1 Peak Load.Method:" COINCIDENT' Relative Humidtyi 50A - COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT 1. .DESIGN: ,:;CONDITIONS FOR Palm Springs`. 31 .F 113 F 73 F 2. SIZING' SPACES SERVED BY SYSTEM'. PEAK' Btu/hr 'PEAK Btu/hr Btu/hr Sales Area 12am),,,= 5.22927 (Aug Spm) 807649 116441 TOTAL SPACE ;LOAD. .522927 807649 116441 Duct Gains &fLosses:. 52293 8D765 Ventilation:. ( .8908.C -FM) 369561 .322181 -79597. Return Air Lighting Gain". 0 TOTAL"SYSTEM LOAD.,. • 944781,. 121.0595 36844 3:. SELECTION A. Safety./Warmup: Factor. 1.43 1.21 B. Maximum Adjusted Load 1351037, 1464820 C. Installed Equipment',Capacity 308000 725462 141788 If Line 3—C > Line 3—B.,,' Explain:. ' FAN°POWER'CONSUMPTION No. Efficiency Peak, Conv Peak Supply Fan Description Sys BHP Motor Drive HP, Fact Watts CFM Supply Fan l x 25,.:0.0 /. (0.88 x 1.00) .=.28,.41 x 746" =21193 28250 Totals 23.41 21193, 28250 -FAN POWER 'DEMAND.- 21193 watts . / 28250 cfm _ 0.750 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING,AND FAN POWER MECH=2 page 18 of 27 . Project•Name: RALPHS MARKET NO:. 195 Date: 4/23%1994. Documentation: ADVANCED`TITLE'24.- COMPLY. 24 User ,2299 SIZING•"AND :EQUIPMENT SELECTION, HVAC gone Name: Mezzanine Offices Heatingy S stem.Name• EMI WCX-12D, Cooling System Name: System. '.Multip1 iler: - 3 Peak. Load Method: COINCIDENT Relative. Humidity: 50 COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE' LATENT 1., DESIGN CONDIT3ONS FOR :Palm- Springs 31, F 113,F 73 F. 2.. SIZING SPACES SERVED.BY`SYSTEM, PEAK Btu/ -hr PEAK .Btu/hr Btu/hr Mezzanine Offices (Jan tam°) 16338:: ('Aug Spm) 2287.8 1396 'TOTAL SPACE LOAD- 16338 .22878 1396 Duct Gains: &`Losses•:',1634> . ` -" 2288 Ventilation: ( 150 CFM) _' 6225 5421 -13.41 Return Air Lighting,Gain: - 0 TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD 24197 305.93 55 3.. SELECTION :: A, Safety/Warmup Factor 1.43 1:21 B. Maximum.Adj.usted Load 34602 37018 C. Installed Equipment Capacity' 52921 33052 0 V; If, Line 3--C >, Line 3=B, Explain: ` FAN POWERCONSUMPTION No. - Efficiency, Peak Conv Peak Supply Fan 'Description - Sys BHP Motor. ;' Drive HP' Fact `:- Watts CFM Supply Fan 3'x 0.13./ [0.55 x 1.00] 0.68 x 746 509 300 -Totals, - -:0 i,68 509 900 FAN.POWER DEMAND 509 -watts /.. 900 cfm- = 0.565 watts/cfm MECHANICAL SIZING AND.FAN POWER MECH-2 page 19 of 27 Project Name: RALPHS-MARKET•NO: 195 Date,: 4/23/1994 Documentation•:';, ADVANCED TITLE 24 _ COMPLY• 24 User 2299 SIZING AND.EQUIPMENT.SELECTION -HVAC Zone Name:: Employee Lounge Heating System'Name: McQuay TSH-041R Cooling System Name,: ' System Multiplier: 1 `'Peak Load Method: COINCIDENT Relative Humidity:, 50 A. COOLING HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT 1. DESIGN CONDITIONS FOR Palm '.S rin ;P gs ' 3l�• F - 113 F 73 F 2. SIZING SPACES -SERVED BY SYSTEM - PEAK "Btu/hr -PEAK Btu/hr Btu/hr Employee Lounge (Jan 12am . ) 10805 (Aug 4pm). 1875'1 .764, TOTAL.SPACE LOAD 10805 18751 764 Duct Gains &:Losses:_ 10so 1875 Ventilation: ( 82 CFM) -3406• _,2794 —734 Return.Air Lighting Gain. - 0 TOTAL'SYSTEM LOAD 15291 23420 30 3. •SELECTION A. Safety/Warmup Factor:1.43 1.21 - B.°Maximum Adjusted. Load 21866 28338 C, Installed Equipment Capacity 1894b 16.694 0 If Line 3-C > Line 3-B,:Explain: FAN POWER CONSUMPTION No.. ;Efficiency Peak,. Conv Peak- Supply Fan, Sys` BHP Motor Drive _HP Fact Watts CFM Supply ,Fan _ 1 x 0.13 / [0.55' x 1:,00] -O.'23 x,-746 170 400 .Totals 0.23 170 400 FAN POWER ;DEMAND 470 watts. / - 400. cfm = 0.424 watts/cfm MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUMMARY. MECH-3 page 20 of 27 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 _'., Date; 4/,23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24, COMPLY. 24.User 2299 -',:PLANT EQUIPMENT SUMMARY Fuel Elec ' . _ Total No, Input: Input Output Equipment. Name Equipment Type Sys.;' (JKBtu) (KW) (KBtu) Std Gas 50 gal or Less Gas.Fired 1` 40.0" 0.0 31.2 CENTRAL SYSTEM , SUMMARY Sys No No.i System, Name -System Type" Sys Economizer.Type 1 McQuay TSH -041E - Split Heat Pump 'I No.:Economizer _ 2 EMI WCX-12D Split• Heat ,Pump" 3 No",:Economizer 3 , Reznor HCX-400 Split FAU=A/.0 1 No. Economizer.' CENTRAL.. SYSTEM RATINGS Sys Heating Cooling , 'No' Type Output' ` Aux• KW." EFF' Type Output Sensible EER SEER 1 Heat Pump 12000 .3-.0 6..60 DX- ". 18000 18000 :_ 9.20'.10.D0 2 Heat Pump 10200 ,.. 3:0' 6.8,0- DX' ...-12000 " 12000. 9:20 10.00 3 Gas Furnace 308000 n/a 0.80 DX; 944600 755.680 8.20 n/a CENTRAL FA SUMMARY=.. .: Supply :Fan Return,Fan Sys . Mtr , Dry Mtr Dry No -Fan,, Type,:, Motor - Location . CFM' � BHP Ef f; ' Ef f CFM BHP • : Ef f Ef f 1 Constant, Volume Draw -Through 40,0 0..•13 55_-100: None 2 Constant Volume Draw -Through 300 0'.13 55'" 10 0 None 3, Constant Volume Draw—Through.- = 282150 25.,,q',0 <88 100. _ None ZONAL FAN SUMMARY Zonal Fan Exhaust: Fan ^ Mtr, Dry Mtr Dry Space. Name No - . CFM ^ BHP Ef f Ef f _ No CFM BHP' Ef, f - Ef f None MECHANICAL,VENTILATION • MECH=4'page 21.of-27 Project'Name:' RALPH�S'MARRET NO. i95 Date: 4/23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY. 24 User 2299 VENTI=LATION SUMMARYBY `SPACE : Tran Floor sgft' CFM Min Design sfer :. Space Name T Occupancy' Area /Occ:' /-Occ CFM` CFM CFM Sales Area. Grocery Sales ' 34,350 -,59-'. 15.3 -8931 8931 = Mezzanine ,Offices Office 998 143 21..5. 150- 150, Employee Lounge Office "'546 143 21.5. 82' 82 TOTALS 9163 9163 Note- If Tailored user,must document sgft/.•Occ and/or CFM/Oee values. • HVAC ZONE HEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY. page 22•of'27 Project Name:'RALPHS.MARKET NO. •19.5 Date: 4/23/1994 -.Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24,. COMPLY 24 User,2299 HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone Name: Sales Area - Heating System -Name: Reznor'HCX=400 Cooling_ System Namet. Frigid Coil -FAH -228 System Multiplier,: - 1 Fan Schedule: Day.Fans.STD Peak Load -'Method: COINCIDENT Relative Humidity: 50 % COOLING SPACES'IN THISZONE PEAK HEATING PEAK ,-SENSIBLE LATENT ,Sales Area (Jan 12 am) 52.2927: (Aug '3pm) -807.649-. 116441 TOTAL SPACE LOAD 522927 807649 116441 Duct Gains'& Losses: 52293 8076'5 ventilation:, ( 8908 CFM) 369561322181 -79597 Return, Air •Lighting, Gain 0 TOTAL SYSTEM'LOAD 944781 1210595 36844 SY.STEM.OUTPUT,AT DESIGN CONDITIONS 308000 725462 141788 NOTE: -The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown -represents the minimum size, equipment which will heat or -.cool this::zpne'.during the design conditions indicated. These numbers include -no safetyfactor,,and the.HVAC contractor should oversize .by a reasonable margin to account for variations•in weather conditions and,the pick=up capacity required to-brng,the zone'to temper— ature as a result of -a Setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection -should note that Sensible•and'Latent Cooling Loads are indicated-to.allow.for accurate.comparison with manufacturer's output data. SPACE HEATING -& `COOLING. LOAD SUMMARY page 23 of 27 Project "Name:.RALPHS MARKET N0. 19.5Date:.4/23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24, COMPLY 24 User 2299 SUMMARY, OF PEAK,HOUR LOADS. FOR SPACE Space Name: Sales Area COOLING .DESIGN CONDITIONS `: HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT Peak Hour: Jan 12am Aug 4pm Indoor Conditions: - .70 F .DB 78, F DB 50 $ RH . Outdoor Conditions. 31 F DB, -,1,10,,F :DB 70 F WB LOAD COMPONENT, Quantity Btu/.hr; Btu/hr Btu/hr Wall Conduction _ 1.3644..0 ,sgft-, 184 .4"33- 142723 Window, Conduction 796.0 sgft %3,8805 17115 ' "Door Conduction 0: 0 .sgft 0- 0 Roof Conduction -312814.0;sgft -.40593 27656 Skylight Conduction: '1536,0 sgft 49121. 19292 Floor. Conduction 0.0: sgft 0 0 Slab Conduction 34350.0 sgft. 31836 0 ' Interior ,Conduction 0;. 0 sgft 01' 0 Infiltration ... '. 615 AC/hr 17813_ .8', 0 Solar -Gain. 2332;0," sgft ' 0 154438 Lighting .6;8700:+0 ,watts " 0 ' 184827° Receptacle 34350..0 watts 0 117237 Process 0::0 watts 0 0 :0c'cupants . ., 582..2; occs 0, 145551: 116441 SPACE `LOADS 5229,27 8'08840: -'116441 Heating AirFlbw: 52292,7 Btu/hr %' [ 1.06 x 35-F DeltaT) ] =.14045 cfm Cooling AirFlow: 808840 Btu/hr / [1.06 x 23'F DeltaT:) ]. _ -.33058 cfm . HVAC- ZONE- BEATING & COOLING LOAD SUMMARY page 24, of 27 ' Project Name:•.RALPHS MARKET NO: 195 Date: 4/23/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY.24 User 2299 HVAC ZONE DESCRIPTION HVAC Zone -Name: Mezzanine Offices Heating, System. Name: EMI.WCX-12D Cooling System Name: System Multiplier.: 3 Fan Schedule: Day'Fans STD -Peak Load Method: COINCIDENT Relative Humidity: - 50 $ COOLING ' SPACES IN THIS ZONE PEAK HEATING. PEAK SENSIBLE LATENT Mezzanine Offices (Jan-12am) 16338 (Aug. 3.pm). 22878, 1396 TOTAL SPACE LOAD ,'16338 22878 1396 - Duct Gains & Losses: L 16342258 Ventilation: ( 150 CFM) _6225., 5427 —13.41 Return Air. Lighting Gain 0 TOTAL 'SYSTEM LOAD•'• 24197' 30593 55 SYSTEM OUTPUT AT. DESIGN CONDITIONS 5.2921 33052 ' 0 NOTE: The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD,shown represents the minimum size equipment which' will• heat or. cool- .this zone .dutring the design conditions indicated. -These _numbers include no safety factor, and.the HVAC contractor should oversize by a reasonable margin to.account for variations in,weather conditions and thepick—up capacity regiired to bring the zone to temper— ature as a result of a.setback thermostat. Those responsible for final equipment selection should note that,Sensible and Latent Cooling Loads are, indicated to allow for.:,accurate comparison with•manufacturer's output data. 'SPACE CHEATING & COOLING.: LOAD: SUMMARY k a page 25 of 27. P Project Name:..R* MARKET NO. 195 Date: 4/23/.1994" �- Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 -COMPLY 24 User 2299• s - 'SUMMARY OF -PEAK HOUR LOADS'.FOR SPACE ' Space Named _ , ; " _ Mez zanirie Offices, TCOOLING c<D,ESIGN CONDITIONS HEATING., SENSIBLE LATENT - Peak. Hour:,'- s " Jan 12 am Aug. 4pm " Indoor Conditions: 7.0 F'j DB - 78F DB 50 $ RH Outdoor � Conditions: 31 'F" DB 110 ' F 'DB 70. F WB -• LOAD COMPONENT `' '. Quantity - 'Btu/hr - Btu/hr Btu/hr Wall Coriduction 859.0 s:gft 11999 11195, Window '.Conduction , 0.0 sgft 0.. .0 Door Conduction �,: 0.:0' sgft 0 0,. Roof Conduction * , 998.0. sgft 1235 1143 ` Skylight Conduction' _n0:0 sgft• " , 0 ' 01 ` Floor Conduction' "0.0 sgft j 0 0 . Slab Conduction _ 0.0, sgft 0 a 0 ` Interior Conduction' +0.0 � sgft - 0 t - 0 Infiltration 0:5'AC/hr t:, 3105 + 0 Solar Gain 0.0.'sgft° t, 0 0 ' Lighting 159b.>8 watts 0 ' , 5448• Receptacle'. 998.O.watt D:`' 3406 Process-- 0:0'.watts 0 ¢. 0 Occupants, x ° 7.0. occs'"0 _ . 1745 1396 ' SPACE LOADS, 16338 22937 1396 - , Heating ' _ ,AirFlota: ; ' 3 16338 Btu/hr. :/ [1.06 x 35: F De1taT) j = 439 cfm • 'Cool:ihq; A,irFiow:' ;. - 22937, Btu/hr'/, >{1.06` x' 23 F De1taT)'] _ 937 cfm HVAC ZONE HEATING, &,. COOLING LOAD-SUMMARY, page 26 of 27 Project Names RALPHS MARKET NO. 195Date: 4/23/1994 Documentation ADVANCED:TITLE 24 t COMPLY 24,'User'2299 J HVAC :ZONE DESCRIPTION- .HVAC ESCRIPTION .HVAC Zone Name: • "Employee Lounge 'Heating System Name:. f McQuay TSH=041�E Cooling,$ystem Name:R •. j J System Multiplier: Fan Schedule : f, Day Fans 'STD ' t Peak Load Methods t COINCIDENT Relative Humidity:- 50,% , COOLING. - ,SPACES IN•TH.IS ZONE PEAK',. HEATING j PEAK r SENSIBLE LATENT` Employee Lounge <' (Jan :12am.):-a,10805 (Aug - 4pm) ,' 18751 764 ' TOTAL SPACE.'•LOAD 1080.5 i 18751 - 764 • Duct.4Gains. &• Losses. .i$ 1080 ; y 1875 Ventilations ( 82: CFM). 1340.6 + 2794 —734- . Return :Air Lighting Gain - -0 TOTAL SYSTEM' LOAD r : 15291` 23420 30 SYSTEM OUTPUT AT DESIGN. CONDITIONS# 1;8946. 16694 - • 0 NOTE:' ' The TOTAL SYSTEM LOAD shown' represents • the Iuinihum size- equipment. :which will heat or cool. this 'zone during the design conditions' indicated. •Thesenumbers include no safety factor,,�and-,the.HVAC"contractor should —oversize by a reasonable 'margin to,'account for 'variations in weather ' ` conditions and• the pick-up capacity required; to bring the .zone- .to temper— ature as a result 'of a setback- thermostat*..' Those responsible for .final ' .equipment selection should'note.that'Sensible andt.Latent Cooling Loads are indicated to'allow for-,accurate`comparison•wth.manufacturer_'s:.output data., J- +L. av , moi', ;., -- . ,e •✓1 ••�• F ! i.• • r SPACE HEATING & COOLING LOAD: SUMMARY, page 27 of 27 - Project Name:,.RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 Date: 4/23/1994.,• Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY 24 User 2299 SUMMARY OF.PEAK HOUR'LOADS.FOR SPACE. Space Name: _Employee Lounge COOLING DESIGN-CONDITIONS HEATING SENSIBLE LATENT Peak Hour: -._Jan 12am; Aug 4pm Indoor Conditions: 7'0'F DB 78 F DB 50 $ RH Outdoor Conditions_:,- 31 .F DB 110. F DB* 70 F WB LOAD COMPONENT Quantity Btu/hr Btu/hr Btu/hr Wall Conduction 598.0 sgft 843'U 12327" Window Conduction, 0.0 sgft 0 Q, Door Conduction 0.0:sgft .0 0 Roof Conduction-: 546.0 sgft 675 625 Skylight Conduction 0_0 sgft - 01, -0 Floor :Conduction 0...0, sgft • . _ 0", 0 Slab Conduction .0.0 sgft °0. 0 Interior Conduction• 0.0.'sgft 0:' 10. Infiltration. 0.5 AC/hr 1699 0 Solar. Gain 0.0 sgft 0` . 0 Lighting 873..6 •watts 0 2981 Receptacle 546.0Vatts, .-0 0. 1863 Process 0.0 watts U 0 Occupants.: 3..8-occs 0 955 ..7-64 SPACE` LOADS, 10805-., ° ' 18.751. 764 Heating AirFlow.: 108015 Btu/hr / { 1.-06 x .35 F,,, DeltaT) ]' _ 290 cfm Cooling A rFlow:.- 18751' •Btu/tir / -(1.06 x 23 F DeltaT). ] _ 766 cfm Table Of Contents for Title ------------------- 24 Report. . Cover Page ..................... ..................................:........ i Table of.Contents._...............`................................°... 2 Form ENV-1 Envelope Certificate of Compliance .::...................... 3 Form ENV-2 Envelope,Summary ... ....`....:.... ........ .............. 5 Form ENV-3 Construction Assemblies........°.`.......................... 9 Form MECH-1 Mechanical.Certificate'of.Compliance ...................... 14 . Form 1 MECH-2 Mechanical Summary ... ............................ 17 Form MECH-3 Mechanical Equipment.Summary ...... . .................. 20 Form MECH-4 Mechanical Ventilation •... -••r••••.••••• 21 HVAC Zone & Space'Loads Summary ........ .;....•:••••••••••••.•••.. 22 Form LTG-1 Lighting Certificate of.'Compliance ..... ... ........ 28 Form LTG-2 Lighting Compliance.Summary..••••••••••• •••••••••• •••• 30 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 1 of 2) LTG -1 page 28 of 30 f 'Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 I'Date: 5/5/1994 Address: NWC Washington and Calle Tampa ------------------- -- Palm Springs, California :Building Permit No Lighting -------------------- Designer:Checked by / Date 0 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 COMPLY 24 User 2299. ---------- 2'-- GENERAL INFORMATION Date ofIPlans: Building Conditioned Floor Area: 35894 sf Building Type: Nonresidential Climate Zone: 15 Phase of Construction: O.New Construction 0 Addition 0 Alteration Method of Lighting Compliance: Prescriptive STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ` This Certificate of Compliance lists.the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title -24, Part 6, Chapter 1 and Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4, Article 1 of the California Code of Regula- tions. This certificate applies only to building lighting requirements. The Principal Lighting Designer hereby certifies that the proposed build- .ing.design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with -the specifications, and with any other calculations.submitted with this permit application. The.proposed building has:been.designed-to meet the lighting requirements contained in sections 110,"119, 130 th.rough,132 and .146 or 149. Please check one: O I hereby affirm that.I'am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer electrical engineer or architect. o'.I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to.Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code.to.sign t.his..document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing docu- ments for work that I have contracted to perform.. 0 I affirm that I am eligible:_under the -exemption, -to Division 3 of the Business and..Professions,Code by Section _______ of the _______________ Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its ---------- preparat.ion;.and for the.following reason:----------------------------- PRINCIPAL LIGHTING DESIGNER --------------------------------- (Signature) (Lic #) (Date) LIGHTING MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures: ________ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (part 2 of 25 LTG -1 page 29 of 30 Project Name: RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 :Date: 5/5/1994 Documentation: ADVANCED TITLE 24 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCOMPLY 24 User 2299 INSTALLED LIGHTING.SCHEDULE No of, Watts/', Ballast.. Bal lasts/ No of 'Note to Name Lamp Type Lamps Lamp ----------------- ------ ------ ----------------- ------ ------ Type ---------- ---------- Luminaire Fixt. --------- ----------- --------- ----- Field ------ - -- ------------ = - -- - --- -----------------.------, ------ -- ---------- -- - - ----- - --------- -------------------- ----- ' ---- ----------------- ------ ------ ----------------- ------ ------ ---------- ---------- --------- ----- -------------------- ------ . MANDATORY AUTOMATIC CONTROLS`' - Control Note to Control Location , ID Control°Type ------------------------.--------------- ------------------------------------- Space Controlled ---------------------- ---------------------- Field _ CONTROLS FOR CREDIT Control Note to ` Control Location. 'ID Control t. Type Space Controlled Field x.i. LIGHTING COMPLIANCE SUMMARY LTG -2 page 30 of 30 ------------------------------------------- Project Name:. RALPHS MARKET NO. 195 ------------------------------ !Date: 5/5/1994 Documentations. ADVANCED.TITLE 24 " ICOMPLY'24 User 2299 ACTUAL LIGHTING POWER , No of Watts Total Name Description Lumin per Default Watts If.not CEC Default va-lue, please provide supporting documentation. ALLOWED LIGHTING POWER BY, SPACE Allowed Floor LPD Total Tailored Space Name Occupancy Area (w/sf)_(watts) (watts) Sales -Area Grocery Sales Area 34350 2.000 68700 0 Mezzanine Offices Office 998', 1.600 1597 0 Employee Lounge _ Office 546 1.600 874 0 TOTALS 35894.1 1.983 7.1170 0 * Note: Tailored Allotment requires supporting documentation on form LTG -4. PROJECT NAME kkPAL_�; (_ r �, V G ,v, /_O `j DATE 2 J _-91 77 CT ADDRESS G_A v (,C/ TA �- DATE OF PLANS r Bu1ldlny PaimlYt;` Cf�ackad by/paf4.::::::.: ;:. `: ` 'e.e«o�;�w :; PRINCIPAL DESIGNER - LIGHTING TELEPHONE DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR LEN F/�c.J �,�" ,t. TELEPHONE S �►-a�-t 1'c GENERAL •- • DATE OF PLANS BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA BUILDING TYPE 19 NONRESIDENTIAL HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL HOTEUMOTEL GUEST ROOM PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITION ALTERATION METHOD OF LIGHTING COMPLETE BUILDING AREA CATEGORY ® TAILORED PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE This Certificate of Compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and'6 of the Cal'Ifomia Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building lighting requirements. The Principal Lighting Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building design repreresented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the lighting requirements contained in sections 110, 119, 130 through 132, and 146 or 149. ' __)Se check one: (j 1 hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a civil engineer, electrical engineer or architect. I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section 5537.2 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor preparing documents for work that I have contracted to perform. F] I affirm that I am eligible under the exemption to Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by Section - of the Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and for the following reason: (PRINCIPAL LIGHTING SIGNER -Nom . ! / "r. (SIGNATURE / l UC. ,NrO& 24 DATE — 3 —q f LIGHTING MANDATORY Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory Measures INSTRUCTIONS• APPLICANT For detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential 6nual published by the California Energy Commission. -1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. LTG -2: Required for all submittals. LTG -3: Optional. Use only if lighting control credits are taken. LTG -4: Optional. Use only if Tailored Method is used. Parts 2 and 3 used only if applicable. N0nrosk1sntW Compfiarwe Fonn O.ownDa 1991 PROJECT NAME DATE. z1•:is'C' :ffamii LF '-�i'�CZY�, tisk: r-- rSs••.. YC ��.... e ...�+e!" '• ..SA�+.�:,...r�L«xW r_• P�.'C' y« I94- 4 ••W+••w, •:-y "_• 1 • .�X'� iY7..r `YY .�.. �'•r :%;i o'. ,. ....•9 �"..%,rV�'����:�T.�',%�.7" `•».+••.Y..;-.,,+ ^'..SLS+ BALLASTS LUMINAIRE NAME CONTROL TYPE J NO. OF ^ (ROOM i) (Auto Time Switch, Exterior;, etc.). , o®® SHE INIMEMO Provide Supporting, Documen 4;s=M=;.Zx� CONTROL LOCATION CONTROL CONTROL TYPE EONMTI�OL LOCATION • or Dwg. f) ^ (ROOM i) IDENTIFICATION'^AN-- (Auto Time Switch, Exterior;, etc.). , SPACE CONTROLLED NonresidentialCompliance Form I� December 1991 EONMTI�OL LOCATION • or Dwg. f) CONTROL IDENTIFICATION F CONTROL TYPE (Occupant, Daylight, Dimming, etc,) ` LUMINAIRES CONTROLLED TYPE .r Of LUMIN. a_0Ew:M4'X' ' NonresidentialCompliance Form I� December 1991 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Lighting Part 2 of 2PROJECT NAME 12,ALf:pf+ G, LTG -1 -iv v/ ., LUMINAIRE NAME (99• Type -1. Type -2. etc.) L M LO R S I. GG SS KK CONTROL LOCATION (Room N) CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL TYPE (Auto Time Switch. Exterior. etc.) 0 ' ©®a ■■■ CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL TYPE (Auto Time Switch. Exterior. etc.) Provide Suppoftg Docurrwntatlon SPACE CONTROLLED ' ©®a Provide Suppoftg Docurrwntatlon SPACE CONTROLLED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - Lighting .,JECT NAME INSTALLED LIGHTING SCHEDULE LAMPS LUMINAIRE NAME TYPE NO. OF (•g. Typal. Type -2, etc.). I F H LAMPS WATTSA.AMP LL ME] El - El 2 El z 32. ❑ .❑ D ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ a❑❑ 000 oat o a cloa CONTROL LOCATION (Room N) CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL LOCATION (Room M of Dwg. •) ........................ CONTROL IDENTIFICATION CONTROL TYPE (Auto Time Switch. Exterior. etc.)' CONTROL TYPE (Oocupant, Daylight, Dimming, eta.) BALLASTS TYPE NO. / LUMINAIRE S E• O• 0❑❑ El ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ El. ❑❑ F-1 1111 ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ o:D❑ ❑❑❑ N Provide Supwft Dqmm LUMINAIRES CONTROLLED TYPE • OF LUMIN. PROJECT NAME DATE �,Icw_r lg?r 1 --5- — 3 —%.4 LUMINAIRE NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF LUMINAIRES ALLOWED WAITS 577 g 1464.1 19. 84 ,v7_ of -WO, 2 X4 .7A Ai a- A -d 6 -7— rd if Ad"T " a SUBTOTAL FROM THIS PAGE PLUS ' SUBTOTAL FROM CONTINUATION PAGE LESS CONTROL CREDIT WATTS (FROM LTG -S) If "Of U*Ing the CEC Default -ADJUSTED ACTUAL WATTS Vb C. Value. please support(ng doaumentatlon.� 1 _3 37 BUILDING CATEGORY (From table 2-53M) WATTS PER SF COMPLETE BIDG. AREA ALLOWED WAITS TOTALS AREA ALLOWED (SF) WATTS AREA WATTS TAILORED Ej PERFORMANCE TOTAL ALLOWED WATTS (From LTG -4 or from computer rurj Nonrooldential Compllaws Form December 19911 PROJECT NAME IGATE Hr BUILDING CATEGORY (Fran table 2-6SM) WATTS PER SF CEC DEFAULT ALLOWED WATTS LUMINAIRE NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF WATTS PER LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRES (Including Ballast) y N• RE] ..00 -�I ❑ M' 0 �❑ EI D N0 Q z'8ti TOTALS f' 8q 2 S�? I 'L s z s -g i �y 33 ��0 �Z d " 3 Sg SUBTOTAL FROM THIS PAGE V d PLUS SUBTOTAL FROM CONTINUATION PAGE LESS CONTROL CREDIT. WATTS (FROM LTO -S) • n not uelnp the CEC Default vawe, Pl"" Provide oupportim dooiwtaADJUSTED ACTUAL WATTS BUILDING CATEGORY (Fran table 2-6SM) WATTS PER SF COMPLETE 8106. AREA ALLOWED WATTS AREA CATEGORY. (From table 2-69N) WATTS PER $F AREA (SF) ALLOWED WATT$ TOTALS TAILORED PERFORMANCE TOTAL ALLOWED WATTS (From LTO -4 of from o w nand L Lsldendal CompNana Form Deo«aber IM C-_...� • C .. c. . PROJECT NAME GATE :K-:-i�1 LUMINAIRE NUMBER OF WATTS PER LUMINAIRE NAME DESCRIPTION LUMINAIRES (Including Ballast) CEC DEFAULT ALLOWED WATTS ' Y N• oo o o 00 Do 00 00 00 00 �y - YT I (0 7 - /Zd -Z, "X AcA TOTALS SUBTOTAL FROM THIS PAGE ALLOWED WATTS PLUS SUBTOTAL FROM CONTINUATION PAGE��'� LESS CONTROL CREDIT WATTS (FROM LTG -9) n not uapp tIM CK DolaW vab^ paaaa provW oupportft doounaetatlon ADJUSTED ACTUAL WATTS AREA CATEGORY (From table 2-65N) WATTS AREA PER SF CSF) ALLOWED WATTS TOTALS L �-•�b .,,..��.s �.�.�........a .�.�..i..-a r�"�""f'r"'�"�;--i'_...»_....�.._........t.=�'..L'..."'.rY::r`=-:s•?f?:,:ct:l'�'t ::r�=.E'-"t;r:'.w �:re�:,:e - C.L�... �:...ar.�= K'.:. u. ��... .{ . • .a . , �•i �:-�•:^:i�•r.:e:: :�... ..��..._..........t.�;r r.»»;, ��•..•r �' -r:r...._:._,.�..—.�.-.:;::i :W.:: x-s�°°:i, ��_ ........ .. i::: ..z'.-'.. .�.a_ --:�::e;.-s::i�•:r.:�z::.W. »t3t�.. .:.:r::"".y :�riii:.._ :.z:. - ..�ir:�v ._':`_.t::i .TAILOREDPERFORMANCE TOTAL• _ LTQ-4 or from computer nW 3 si::ti_•• i'i;;c.�:r`Sa :z. :4i �.:. .�,•�. 1 crag � � 0Ir_ '= ':. .. +�: � ..r.. �• �.%..»»»r ,� }- -•f -.::� ,aa... a'i�• � •3 �::`:���. �•a ,:::: = • ;..yam s: '.�-:�Y...e:::�....5:....=..�C..»..�... »..1 r� _ ••�� YTYS�: �y.�a•1 i YyP sri ,�-:'•i:;�.�i�:•r..= •1:-•"yir';s=; - _ V.-•-r:.x.. .��... �i ».`n:» _ :.i:::� s..r �.��».•-',;'."._ c.-.y Y.:.'{_...r.'»Wic�c��`�::•L=a:,:: �r._`�a'::�z� Illuminance.1. Watts for Watts • •Categories r Watts3. • DIsPlay Public Area DisplayLmn:� Sales Feature Wall Display r 4. Total Allowed Watts (line . s 1+2+3) Watts .. i�eAti�•,Car., aa..��'•., `-.'�.t..+�},•.,'�g • • r •, .�s�i' : •��� :.�...�r._.»..�•� � ...�::i ?.`_:::.—..:� - TASK ACTIVITY FLOOR ALLOWED, AREA WATTS AV 44 PAGE TOTAL BUILDING TOTAL OF WATTS © p L� 1 L . I • s �� C � _ ..•ft:'wJ•�',raG:l�rn'T-A��.•.•L �.L 'L•.d..t::.����.s 1•r� u� ,-.. F�=.3 �:4�r. 9��-��1�•:��: �•C:3�•���+T w::'3::'T`•.. �.`. �,::.':�.: _`L--�rsn.�. PROJECT NAME 0 TASK / ACTIVITY 0 © 91 'Enter Mounting Hslpht or Throw Olat�nca if eppllcabl�. ID F 0 R] ALLOTTED WATTS ALLOTTED WATTS DESIGN WATTS TASK AREA ALLOWED AWAn8D LUMIN. Dist. ALLOWEDof) LPD (D x E) LPD (E x F) CODE M WATTS(Min. G or K)32.2 TOTAL AREA PUBLIC DISPLAYS—J SF 206 J =i 9 -IA mmmmy, PAGE TOTAL r BUILDING TOTAL-------&-. nA + ALLOTTED WATTS DESIGN WATTS TASK / ACTIVITY Throw TASK Mtg. AREA ALLOWED ALLOWED WATTS DESIGN LUMIN. WATTS/ ALLOWED Dist. Hot. ( af) LPD (D x E) CODE QTY. LUMIN. WATTS WATTS (H x 1) (Min. F or J) TOTAL AREA PUBLIC DISPLAYS—J SF PAGE TOTAL r BUILDING TOTAL-------&-. nA ALLOTTED WATTS DESIGN WATTS TASK / ACTIVITY Throw TASK Mtg. AREA ALLOWED ALLOWED WATTS DESIGN LUMIN. WATTS/ ALLOWED Dist. Hot. ( af) LPD (D x E) CODE QTY. LUMIN. WATTS WATTS (H x 1) (Min. F or J) TOTAL AREA PUBLIC DISPLAYS—J SF PUBLIC J TOTAL �— DISPLAY AREA x 0.1 _ MAXIMUN Nonrssldantlel Compllxraa AREA PUBLIC DIBPLAY8 (8F) WATTS Form D�cembsr 1991 w TASK / ACTIVITY ---------- 10-0(4, -D Ii f'La L. -tem .b. n.» �•"z.:.: e 138 � � . • r�_�'-i. ' e a TOTAL AREA FLOOR DISPLAYSF GROSS BALES: TOTAL AREA —���—� TOTALZ. f./fL� ��� x �•� _ ¢6 MAXIMUN AREA FLOOR DISPLAYS (SF) WATTS. N B © o 0 0© o o J ALLOTTED WATTS DESIGN WATTS TASK ALLOWED AREA CAT. 0 LUMIN. WATTS/ DESIGN ALLOWED ( ef) LPO (WDA I E) CODE QTY' LUMIN. WATTS WATTS (H x 1) (MIM F or J) TOTAL AREA WALL DISPLAYSI SF GROSS SALES WALL AREAX TOTAL D — �� MAXIMUN AREA WALL DISPLAYS (SF) WATT8 Nonresidential Compllenoe Form Deo�mHer 1991 � i y .;` , • ,vim:, ; _ - Earth Systems Consultants Buena Engineers.Division �+ Southern California . 79-81113 Country club Drive Bermuda Dunes; CA 92201 (619) 345-1588 (619) 328-9131 FAX (619) 345-7315 April 27, 1994" B7 -3119-P2 - 94-04-765 Rich Development Company 796 West Ninth Street San Pedro, California 90731 Attention: Tab Johnson Project: LaQuinta Village Shopping Center. Calle Tampico ,& Washington Street LaQuinta, California Subject Geotechnical Engineering .Report Addendum Ref: Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Buena Engineers, Inc. dated July 25. 1991; ' Job No. BT 3119-P1. Report No. 91-07-778 INTRODUCTION This addendum report was prepared to address the revised building locations and configuration and `to provide supplemental recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed shopping.. center complex., It is our understanding that the anticipated loading is higher than that indicated in the referenced report. Column loads of up to 100 kips and wall loading of up to 6.0 kips per linear foot are expected for the Ralphs building. The referenced Geotechnical Engineering Report was prepared by our firm based upon the original shopping center, configuration, The revised configuration includes a Ralphs market, two (2) shop" buildings and four (4) satellite. building pads. Improvements have been made to Washington Street and Calle Tampico since the production of the referenced report however, the conditions on the remainder of the project site appear unchanged. FIELD EXPLORATION: Three (3) additional borings were excavated in the areas_ indicatedon the revised site plan .included in a transmittal. we received from Sean Robert with The Nadel Partnership dated March 23, 1994. The borings were excavated. on. April 18, 1994 - using eight (8) inch diameter hollow stem augers powered by a CME 45B drilling rig. Samples were- obtained - within the- borings with a two and one-half (2.5)* inch diameter ring sampler (ASTM' D 3550). Samples were obtained - by driving the the sampler with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer dropping approximately thirty (30) inches, the number of blows required to drive the sampler one foot was recorded. The boring logs �1_ire attached and the approximate boring locations are indicated on the attached plan:' -',. April 27, 1994 B7 -3119-P2: 94-04-765 LABORATORY .TESTING Samples , were returned to the laboratory for further classification and testing. The in-situ moisture content and unit dry, weight for the ring samples were determined in accordance with ASTM D 2937. Consolidation tests were performed on several of the samples in general accordance with ASTM D 2435. Hydrometer Analysis was performed in accordance with California Test Method . No. 203' for classification purposes. �. SOIL CONDITIONS: As indicated by the borings, the site . soils are composed primarily of fine sandy, clayey silts overlying very fine, to fine grained silty sands. The field exploration and laboratory testing indicate that the surface soils are very `loose with .the ring samples indicating. relative compaction as low .as seventy-one (71) percent of maximum density. The soils were found to be dry throughout. Consolidation testing indicates ,that the site soils are susceptible to settlements due to the introduction of moisture and. the additional loading of structures. As .expected, the ,soil conditions encountered are 'very similar to those encountered during.. our ' initial' site investigation. SITE PREPARATION: Based upon the- results of our recent investigation, it is our, opinion that the recommendations for site grading as included in, the referenced report remain applicable with the following exceptions. It . is, standard policy for Ralphs to. require compaction to at , least ninety-five ' (95) percent relative compaction throughout the building pads for their stores. This degree of compaction should be obtained throughout the Ralphs building pad .and should not be necessary' for the remainder of the building pads. In addition, we recommend that the overe'xcavation depth for the Ralphs building pad be increased by one (1) foot due to the higher than expected foundation loading .for the Ralphs building. . In summary the footings for the Ralphs building pad should be supported by at least six (6) feet, of soil compacted to a minimum of ninety-five (95) percent of .maximum density. - The remainder of the building foundations should be supported by, at least five (5) ,feet of soil compacted to - a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum: density. Based upon our experience during the ,grading of the LaQuinta Civic Center project site just south of this' projectsite, it appears that the shrinkage and subsidence estimates provided in the referenced report may be somewhat low. A shrinkage estimate of thirty (30) percent may be ° more accurate and subsidence. of three -tenths (0.3) to five -tenths (0.5). of a foot may occur at the bottom of the building pad excavations. STRUCTURAL. CONSIDERATIONS: The allowablebearing values recommended, in the referenced report remain applicable for. the design and contruction of the foundation systems for the °proposed Ralphs bulding as well as the remainder of the proposed shop buildings and satellite buildings. April 27, 1994 B7 -3119-P2 94-04765 The site "soils are slightly expansive.• with expansion testing indicating Expansion Indices in the: "low" category in: accordancewith UBC Standard No. 29-2. Based upon, this, a minimum slab thickness. of three and. one- half, (3.5) inches is. recommended. The corresponding minimum slab. reinforcement is 6x6-10/10 welded wire mesh. Appropriate slab thickness. and'` reinforcement" is dependent on anticipated loading as well, as several other factors and should be determined by the. project Structural Engineer. A vertical modulus of subgrade reaction of approximately 150 tcf (tons per ' cubic foot). should be appropriate- for use by .the Structural Engineer in slab design. Geologic. and Seismic Hazards: The geologic and seismic hazards as outlined in' the referenced report remain valid and should be considered ' in in the design and constructions of the proposed structures as well as. the associated site " improvements: Pavement Design: _ As requested, the surface soil. was sampled for R -value determination to .be used in pavement. design: Laboratory testing " was performed in accordance with California Test Method No. 301F. Testing resulted in. an R -Value of 32. The following asphalt pavement design sections are, based upon a design R -Value" of 30 and traffic indices. of 4.0 and. 6.0 as requested by Sean Robert of The Nadel Partnership. Traffic Index = 4.0 1 Use 3.0 inches of Asphalt on 4.0 inches of Class II base- material Traffic Index = 6.0 " Use 3.0 inches of Asphalt on 8.5 inches of Class II base material or, Use 3.5 inches of Asphalt on 7:5 inches of Class II base material or. Use 4.0 inches of Asphalt on 6.5 inches' of Class 'II base material The given design sections are- based upon pavement confined by curbs. subgrade should be compacted to at least ninety (90) percent relative compaction and base material should be compacted to at least ninety-five (95) percent relative compaction. It should, be noted that a considerable amount of grading is anticipated- on the site therefore the . composition of . the- site soils and the corresponding R -Value could change. R -value should be reevaluated after rough grading and the pavement sections should be adjusted accordingly. It"_ is our understanding that decorative pavers are proposed for . the driveways. Based upon standard design procedures provided by. the National Concrete Masonry Association, the, pavers should be underlain by approximately ., eight (8) inches of Class II base 'material as well as. the usual approximately two (2) inches of clean sand bedding, material." Suppliers of concrete pavers , should be consulted in establishing the design criteria for areas where pavers will be utilized prior to final design. r.artn systems %.vasuuaMs �.. ,a � APPROXIMATE BOAINO IOCATIOHS — Ei�/S%/NFA 0 kx'11;; .�:: R:•� + -:►�►� ... . i 4rAl (' •.� r . �Z•�l t TOO • '� .f�•sa � j Al Calle Tampico Shopping Center Date: 4/19/94 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. "9 ' FileNo. B7 -3119-P2 a •- E DESCRIPTION o Me m o ' REMARKS (3 Co c3 .0 to c o cc E 0 BI: Brown clayey. sandy ML - silt - 20 88.2 2.0 76 Y s 5 28 87.8 4.3 76 - B1 interbedded with sand lenses . F At: Gray brown slightly SM clayey silty very fine 1 0 to fine sand. - 27 Scattered thin silt layers 15 26 61: Brown. clayey sandy, ML silt 20 28 Al: Gray brown slightly SM Scattered thin silt layers _ clayey silty very fine to fine sand 81: Brown clayey sandy ML 25 27 silt A.1 9 4-5 7. . Relatively undisturbed Total'Depth = 26' ring sample No Free Water . - No Bedrock 30 ® No recovery 35 40 .45 - Note: The stratification " ..lines represent the - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 transitions may be -gradual.. t Calle Tampico Shopping Center Date: 4/19/94 Location: Pet Plan BORING NO. 10 File No. 87-3119-P2 DESCRIPTION o o m " REMARKS o a° . 0.1 B1:. Brown clayey, sandy ML silt " 12 85.5 4.6 74 5_ 35 90.7` .3.4 79 s - Al: Gray brown slightly SM ' ._ clayey silty very fine 10 to fine sand } - 32 91,1 1,7 79 Scattered thin interbedded - silt :layers 15 24 -.Relatively undisturbed. Total Depth = 16' ring- sample - No Free Water 20 0_ No recovery; No Bedrock 25 30 35 40 45 - Note: The stratification - lines represent the - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 transitions may be gradual. Calle Tamaico ShoDoina Center Date:' 4/19/94 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 11 File No. B7 -3119-P2 a $0DESCRIPTION m 2L 3 c a a m o m REMARKS Q -0cc E 0 81: Brown clayey sandy ML _ r - silt _ 9 A 1 : Gray brown slightly. SM 81.9. 1.6. 71 Thin interbedded silt layers silty very fine il _clayey 5 to fine sand 22 1.0 44 93.5 3.0 82 131 layer 3" thick 15 18 93.3- 1.8 8.1 - Relatively undisturbed Total Depth a 16' ring sample.. No Free Water No Bedrock 20 C No recovery 25 - 30 35 40 45 Note: The stratification - lines represent the - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 - transitions may be gradual. uuu uuuwuunwownuun u.: ouuutuuuuneuuuut tui utttuuttuuutu���ntn t.0 uuuutuuuwnuuuu use Ht=t; July 40, 1 YY I 67=3119-P 1 z 91-07-778 The Koenig Companies 2601. Airport Drive;. Suite 24&'. : '. Torrance, California 90.505 Project: Calle Tampico Shopping Center La Quinta, California Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report _ Ref: - Geotechnical. Engineering. Reportby Buena Engineers, Inc. dated July 26, 1991; Job No. 67-3303-P1; Report No. 91-07-780 -Presented herewith is our Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the proposed commercial -shopping center .and adjacent residential development to be located in the City of La Quinta, California. This report incorporates the tentative information supplied to our office and in accordance with the, request, recommendations for. general site development and foundation design are provided. This report was p prepared to stand as a whole, and no part of the report should be excerpted or used to exclusion of any other. part. This -report completes our" scope of services in accordance with our agreement. Other services which may be required, such as plan review and grading observation are additional services and will be' billed according to. the Fee Schedule in effect at the time'services are provided. Please contact the undersigned if theren"are any -questions concerning this report or the recommendations included herein. Respectfully submitted, BUENA ENGINEERS, INC. Reviewed and Approved, 02 Hogan R. Wright Brett L' Anderson, P.E. Staff Engineer v No. C045389 R. Layne Richins i.:` Exp. C-30-83 Staff Geologist PC CIVIL SOF cAuF°Ec' SER Copies: 6 - The Koenig Companies 1 - P. S. File 1 -VTA File " BERMUDA.DUNES BEAUMONT BAKERSFIELD LANCASlF4 rcn� roe July; 25, 1991 -1 B7 -3119-P1 91-07-778 INTRODUCTION This Geotechnical Engineering: Report has been prepared for the proposed commercial shopping center and adjacent, residential development to be located in the City of La Quinta, California. A It is assumed that the commercial structures will be of lightweight single story construction. 'It. is assumed, that the buildings will be supported by normal continuous or pad footings. B. Structural considerations 'for building column.. loads, of .up to 50 kips and a maximum wall loading of 3.0 kips per linear foot were. used as a basis for recommendations related to the construction of the commercial buildings.- C. uildings:C. These are, estimated` values since. -foundation plans were not. available at the time of production of this report. If design loading is to exceed these assumed values, it will be necessary to reevaluate. the given recommendations. D. All- loading is assumed to be dead plus reasonable live load. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our services was to evaluate the site soil conditions, and to provide conclusions and recommendations relative to the site and the proposed development. The scope of work includes the following: A A general reconnaissance of the site. B. Shallow subsurface exploration by drilling: C. Laboratory. testing of selected soil samples obtained from - the exploratory borings drilled for this project. D. Review of selected technical literature pertaining. to .the site. E. Evaluation of field and laboratory data relative to soil conditions. F. Engineering analysis of the data obtained from the exploration and testing programs. G. A summary of our findings and recommendations in written report. Contained. In This Report Are: = A Discussions on regional and local geologic and soil conditions. B. Graphic and/or tabulated results of laboratory tests and field studies. July 25, 1991: -2 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 C. Discussions and recommendations relative to allowable foundation bearing capacity, recommendations for' foundation design, estimated total: and differential settlements, lateral earth pressures, site grading criteria, geologic and seismic hazards._ Not Contained Ln This Report: A. Our scope of services did not include any environmental assessment or investigation to determine the presence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater or air, on, below or around this site. SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located at the 'northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street in the City of La Quinta, California. A The site is presently' vacant with moderate desert brush,. weeds and scattered debris. B. The site is fairly level throughout. There -are existing, underground utilities along the streets. FIELD EXPLORATION . Exploratory borings were drilled for observing the. soil profile, and obtaining samples for further analysis. 12 B. C A total of twelve (12)'borings were drilled. for soil' profiling' and sampling to a maximum depth of fifty, (50) feet below the existing ground surface. Eight (8) borings were drilled in the .commercial shopping center area. and four (4) in the residential development area. The borings were drilled on June 21 and June 24, 1991, using an eight (8) inch diameter hollow -stem auger powered by, a CME 45-B drilling rig. The approximate boring, locations as indicated ,on the attached plan in Appendix. A, were determined by pacing and sighting: from existing streets and topographic features. The boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. Samples were secured within -the borings with a two and one-half (2.5) inch inside diameter ,ring sampler (ASTM D 3550, shoe similar to ASTM D 1586). The samples were obtained by driving the sampler . with a one hundred forty (.140) pound hammer, dropping thirty (30)' inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler one foot was recorded. Recovered soil samples were sealed in containers and returned to the laboratory for further classification and testing. Bulk disturbed 'samples of the soils were obtained from cuttings developed during excavation of the test borings. The bulk samples July 25, 1991 -3 B7 -3119-P1 91-07-778 were. secured for classification purposes and represent a mixture of soils within the noted depths., D. The final logs represent our interpretation of the contents of the field logs,."and the results of the laboratory observations and tests of the field samples. The final logs are included in the appendix A of this report. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types although the transitions.may be gradual. LABORATORY TESTING After a visual and tactile classification in- the field, samples were returned to the laboratory, classifications were checked, and:a testing program was established: A Samples were reviewed along with field logs to determine which would be further analyzed. Those chosen were considered- as representative of soil which would be exposed and/or used in grading and those deemed within building influence. B. In-situ moisture content and unit- dry weights for the core samples were. developed in" accordance with ASTM D.2937. C. Settlement and hydroconsolidation potential" was evaluated from the results of consolidation tests performed. in! accordance with ASTM 2435. D. The relative strength characteristics of the. subsurface soils were determined, from the results of direct shear tests. Specimens were placed in contact with water at least twenty-four (24) hours before testing, and were then sheared under normal loads ranging from 0.5 to 2.0kips per square foot in general accordance with ASTM -D 3080. E. Classification tests consisted of: Expansion Index (UBC Standard No. 29-2), Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture (ASTM D 1557) and Hydrometer: Analysis (California Test .Method 203). F. Refer to Appendix B for tabular and graphic. representation. of the test results. SOIL. CONDITIONS As determined by the borings, site soils were found to consist primarily of sandy silts and silty fine sands with interbedded silt layers. The boring logs in Appendix A contain a more detailed description of the soils encountered. A The soils were found to be fairly loose throughout. Ring samples indicate relative compaction as low as seventy (70) percent of maximum density. " • July. 25, 1991 -4-� B7 -31.19-P1 91-07-778 B.. The near surface soils,were found to bequite dry and. consolidation testing indicates a, susceptibility to large _ settlements due to the addition of water and loading. C:: Clayand silt contents of the -soils exhibit low plasticity. Exparision' tests indicate the sandy surface soils to be in the 'very low'',to 'low' expansion categories in accordance with Table 2 in Appendix B of r this report. Refer to section'. F of .the structures section for specific explanations and requirements dealing with expansive soil. E. Soils should be readily cut by- normal grading- equipment. GROUNDWATER 1 f Free groundwater was not encountered in `any of the -borings. The depth, to groundwater in the area. is generally in excess of forty ,(40) feet. Fluctuations in. groundwater � levels may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature and other factors. x REGIONAL GEOLOGY ; The project site is located in the southern Coachella Valley near, the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains: The `Coachella Valley is part of the tectonically active Salton Basin. This basin is a closed, intemally, draining. trough that has. been filled with a complex series of continental clastic materials during Pleistocene and"Holocene time (Van'de Camp, 1973). The San Andreas riff zone dominates ,the geology ;of the. Coachella Valley. The Banning and Mission Creek faults, which are parts of the San Andreas system are responsible for earthquakes. recently felt in the Coachella Valley. Other regional faults -that have produced events felt in the Coachella Valley are the San Jacinto, Imperial and Elsinore faults (see figures l & 2). Based upon the historical and prehistorical record, the Coachella Valley segment of the San Andreas fault system is- likely' to generate a magnitude seven (7.0) or. greater earthquake within the next fifty (50) years. The potential for a -magnitude seven (7.0) earthquake within the next fifty (50) years is estimated by.Seih (1985) as Migh`<50%-90%). LOCAL GEOLOGY The, project is in an area that has once been covered; by Ancient Lake Coahuila. Lithologic units observed consist chiefly of Quaternary lake deposits. The boring logs in Appendix -B.contain specific descriptions of the soils encountered on site. The 'project site -is, approximately seven and= five'tenths- (7.5) miles. southwest of the San Andreas fault system. -'Figure,3 shows the project site in relation to the local geology. t • - .. T.soft Z ,i., •: , + o�"� 36• 2 + „c \'• .?, Isesets O CerO�O ��! • I Y - GaRLCCR . Bo►eryt.ea - Tott 1SE :e ocM Beet . r ,fi Bs•uo.. PINE LeT�aO- BJt: t Lancaster' SA ra YN soy 0 Santo Bertxro a+� q�,✓s `' Vent✓a �sRi L 1 ea::e Sen Berro.arto T.tstt-N+te Porus 3e , Sone Rose b\/ Sent a C►vt Is. T l�► + Parov iii f• • • RI.p stet S1, Peres ��y Owers Low [ts•trt^Sz' 9 Ce " Soma -••• \ f• f _ � pro .. oyA�. • • \ 4 ITE Oceo-s-it Ber+ego ' c� •rte 12t• 120' sow + e/+ t .t 'J'O,P ' . f 8re.kT 3S• " 1 , �►eTewre ... O. � ! � SEI CWw• �� y Son O;ego T �• ��e;i1L0'�" aos + Cnse�ees. J., .may o' so foo ria s,n • .. 9C tti�4 Cent, ue• a7' u6• a�• I Base map of,south•era California-r-egion with major faults . - - ,Fault Map of Southern California Figufe 1 r t - BUfNA; ENGINEERS, INC. 1927 (6) •°9iSApp \\ tone Pine \ 1546 (6.3i _ I � ,CAino Lch Sokers/4/0;. ,.. 1 " 1952(7.7,6.4,6.1,6.1) ."Scher 1 /� ,N,oiorc. 1947(6221; °Son. o S 16 (6 i Borslcw` _ ��tSorncn • n: o—7f cpr— o -a le J 1941(6.0) •. \ �,`, 1925 (63) �.. \ , .•. 198G(5-9) Son2er.-crCino' OLcs.4rye/e • ' 1948(6.51 s 1923 (6'/e.; 91 1933 (6.3; ` 1937(6.0: \ 1554(6.21 (. 1964 (6:4=crrf90 % ?row/er r�\ ° 1942(6. 51 iS4067) 1915 ( 61/4 6 N ° —re.+ — e c.l 1934 (6.5, 1934 (7.0 1915 (7.1) f • .. � . 1935(6.01 '' � 0 /00 Miles Ens,nee� 1^956(6.8,6:1,6.3,6/017 .4; I/ IS;0(6.C1.� 1954 (6.3 .6 01 Earth 0u'akes of'.magnitude 5.9 and •��-'zic Epicenter Map of greater in the Southern California Southern California Region, 1912 — 1972 (including the' Figure 2 North Palm. Springs Earthquake), From Nileman et al `(19.73);'.. $VENA ENGINEERS, INC. nATr., /LY`J/yl rig c Nn. �-t Vit' -�•� \_'•.,'; v� i.•C� .�` ::.C:\��'��:•. �, .,,,-•��' ''�, i "�, ,,. .` +'' _ a.v, 'tir_C-„r ,��. `: i'a�•i S,L`gr -- y4='i'i: �;'� -tel-' �� %�� w `�1_'�.. -}''• e�' `I:: ' 'I �,'• ��r".', • ? ' _ � �'` r•• ' •� .: -, r4tP_: ; .'f - tea..—�`�y — • ,�, ��\._ �'f8'i� .w e -: ct c/ •• f= •>' -?• y ` _ �:^i;�-�:;< <�` - �� l•. - c '•:.:• ' 1� Fit=';�•�. P-.?�,_��y,(`:- ;� ,. ^ 'r .�� .•/T�• i1�.!' .:.� 'i - •.t • •. M .-..iJ� `^'iy�^ ;is . F. ;, \ Ct.1 i• "`\�.. i �., `• ' } ' -�►� -\i•\ -�� iiv��:.� ���� '!.\��,\ =.Ili �. Litz %cc� •` '�' ! �. f •.i ,fir :' Y �`-T•• !. �,.�f I•i C.:ca :r • •v:-44zr •ice`!; - - �`. i : is --`: ��`r�� '� F --•� 1� IAM V: 'A ;�;�:-'i ;^}'e:=y�r - `ice i� (� �1 i '• �- .^�',.: •' ( '1• _ :; ` ?•T'.-1 c �� '{ � ►.. ;;._ 'E`.} ! '—i—�i�c.■In cc vs c•C31-s ► r tom, !-'..1. .'',1��-- �:.� = `•r= C': �., Ory ..' ':� _ ?1' t ii•lw �%CitLE tbGr may. I y '' SJ� -`'%s;..'� � ; %',� ise3si s �:f • � t .-.� � [ . -• . ,� I. I k l �_ ` s.... Yjt , I' i'L.� - .'tee �•�/:�• .'�. ',<`''::�— -'1__ ;_:I:{ t etc_:r.e w� nir.c o•� _� :.i •�fl': `f 4.T.t '\ i �f,�iJJ,.' - ...•-:�' •� .,..,i:• - jr •t �♦ I. M. -,��>� f'e•!�'•Y.�S•1'• �C _ � _ • :.. = :� _ =:; :'��- �` •.. �.1.. I �� i f.:rr! ii �I• ^� :-i .\:F: ? b' �' *, rt_ r ic: , `fir, c.:c _sca s'-`ra .t•e•�-s; t 'e `--;,t�ei�f:'��r�i-�";;��.:5.• •L:J�-'a• �/i •'•�,c'--'rr I! '_i,. :ti�.�,.'1--i�C.I•i'i:t'tt:t j i'1 I r•t'�' �/. } •-_'��t,,,T !`-�•'d. ♦ 'f'tc. i �•.��^ �.w:• ir- .i.ri c.�: -._�fr t::� �S'•i_.• •� i 1 j �•!t lam' f�.i•T�^� Wit.•• �`�t: e� '� ,�• � •�' .%S ','i`.' ' ?.►;,:.Ci,i.� 1�...�.�='�=1::: `i ;. ��� 1(` Via.. i��i-• .s'; . C�� `t • 7 _e • 1.�, i t: it -_=:`; .:.t iii ��?.i ��' '•' .• : L:t !- :.• t •'�5.. •v 1: •.L{!i•� e�:�\ :tr. r'1.��?:1� �:•• ••��\'; _�?�" ,.-.t•_�•. i!'�-ti.: r.:i.•' •_:!-_ .1.:-. `•it'. :1:�•+,a�.�s I.:�. lot. •r.• i—�, hA 15, �' �,••�! *=�•••�''y}F b4j� .�: 'L{�a.!i�:2:•�' •�.�r.t��-^ittiT���/ �+�..;' • `.�:5.�-��,', '�i;=-P— ��' .V,r •''� • ,^• ^:�'Li�(/ Zfir.hr�"\•� „'' �.'.,`,;y..-�.f ��:+. -i:.•ji��-..}G�:=. :L% f ��i.•y `• =�-: • _.� I ��� -OF ^tfrl:.'��L�i �• :.' _'•-:�'.y-:? '�' ' ?% •_� �'�: �. :�•.ft-.-.t-`b+Rc.:S�:Sc•::.4w• .� -�� ,:-�' `%; `�J' .t'�.�' '.. _ ••�•,�•.� �F..�•�. .,•� �.s' 1 'r.• ti :3^ • F:_��,. .. r, '.Cc =Li• ::'I�: •..• V._ '� yr' •i. ��• ••-.- 'S• is `r••,:��"�• \z.�_��T t�':tj'fA':.yy��:,=�,l ..-�_ . ':t:.: • ��i .r�.i• 'lfJi*4- S„\� ✓ 'y'7�*.=t�._�.i�..� ;jt•:9�.-;�: •,�.^"%- �!��-_r• •tea^c ! �;:�% �Ct .=� �^+'=��:;.:� i- •'.1��'-•• •.� •+'`'- � i� �� ;. • moi,_, ��_�c, I� • j`� :..� ;� � -' �J.�ni' `. � a�._=`�- gas+: r! ,�t Jc� f '�%i_ •1.' =',7 -L • :� ,i �, ��'`°,. .:"moi ., � •- ..� '.x. ::: r��t. L'.• ., •r` �, Ipl. =a;;�_' e. - ec•ctwo:ri.�- MAP OF PROJECT SITES ,crth "`�} 3�'n RELAII0N TO LOCAL GEOLOGY ' ';' }� ~`i - '''t' i•" ioY :• SANTA ANA MAP SHEET kale 1: 250000 ~.: '' t�}�S :."'�* 3 FIGURE •:'a:=''= °` �`�� BUENA ENGINEERS, INC �._ =,; r ,,elf a unuf-Slly-F'1 'July 25, 1991 -5- 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS . A . Primary SeismicHazards:. Primary seismic geologic hazards -that -may affect any property in,. the seismically active Southern California area include: 1 Fault Rupture: a. The project site is not located in any Alquist-Priolo special study zones. Nor are any ' faults mapped through or adjacent to the project area. At the time. of. drilling no surface -expression of faulting was observed. b. Fault- rupture would most likely, occur along. previously established traces. However, fault' rupture may occur at other locations not previously mapped. 2 Ground Shaking: a.: Strong, ground motion is the.seismic hazard most likely to affect the site during the life of the intended structures. Using methods developed by Seed and Idriss (1982) and modified by Krinitzsky (1988) the following table was :compiled, for. anticipated, accelerations which may be experienced during an earthquake of the project site. TABLE_ 1 Estimated ; Maximum Maximum Repeatable Approximate Design'- Acceleration Acceleration Ground" Distance to Earthauake in Rock. i it Accelerations Proiect Site San Andreas: 7.5 5og ..38g ` .25g 7.5 mi.° San Jacinto 6.5 .20g .16g . .1 Og 18.O mi. Richter Magnitude, Maximum Probable" Ploessel & Slosson 1974 a b. Because of the alluvial sedimentary nature of the soils on site, ground shaking characteristics, are expected to include low frequency: vibration with relatively. high amplitudes. Duration of shaking could be from. fifteen 0 5) -., ..,,to thirty-six (36) seconds: The project .area is mapped in Ground Shaking Zone III C as designated by the County of Riverside, California. Ground Shaking Zones are based on distance from causative faults and soil types. c: "-- The project is mapped near- the Riverside County Liquefaction- Study Zone; :however, no groundwater was --observed in our borings. B7 -3119-P1 91-07-778 B. Secondary Seismic.Hazards: Secondary seismic geologichazards 'that may affect the project site area include settlement, liquefaction and ground lurching. 1. Settlement-, whether- seismically .related or not, is considered a potential hazard in this, area. Historic records report significant episodes of settlement in the Coachella Valley area due to seismic forces and/or heavy rain fall and. flooding. 2 Liquefaction is the loss- of soil strength as a result of an increase in pore water pressure due to cyclic seismic loading. Conditions for liquefaction include relatively' high water table, (within 40' of surface),. low relative densities of the saturated soils and susceptibility of the soil to liquefy based on grain size. No. free groundwater was encountered in our exploratory. borings. 3. Ground lurching is generally associated with fault rupture and liquefaction. Because of the sites distance from any known 'active' faults, the. possibility of ground lurching; affecting the site is.considered low: 4. Other secondary seismic: geologic hazards that may result from. an -earthquake include tsunamis (tidal waves) and seiches. - (waves oscillating in an, enclosed area, Le`.,: storage tanks, lakes).. Based on the project sites geologic .location and topography, it is our opinion that the probability of the above hazards affecting the property are negligible. C. Non -Seismic.: Hazards:. Other geologic hazards that could affect the project site include landslides, flooding and, erosion. 1. No evidence of past landsliding was observed at the site nor are any known landslides, mapped in or around the project site. The subject property. is not at the immediate base of any steep hills. and is located on relatively flat ground. 2. Flooding and erosion are always a consideration in arid regions. The properties flat topography -suggests this is an area of. deposition. No gullies or rareas of active erosion were observed on site. increased erosion, either fluvial .or aeolian, may occur as a result of construction activity. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following is a summary of our conclusions and professional: opinions based on a. "review of selected, technical literature and. the site investigation.. July 25, 1991:-7- _ - 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 A The primary geologic hazard relative.to site development is severe ground shaking from earthquakes originating on nearby faults. The site is located in Southern. California which is -an active seismic area. In our opinion, a major seismic event originating .on the San. Andreas fault zone would be the most likely cause of significant earthquake activity at'the`site within the estimated design life of the proposed development.. B.: Settlement due to seismic factors or flooding. is a potential hazard in the Coachella Valley area. C. Areas of alluvial soils may be susceptible- to erosion. Preventative measures to minimize seasonal flooding and. erosion should be incorporated into site grading plans. D: Fluvial erosion may affect the site during construction: E. Other, hazards including. liquefaction, lurching, landslides, tsunamis and seiches are.considered negligible: F. It is our opinion that the upper'native soil will not provide uniform or adequate support for the proposed structures. without the-. recommended sitework. To decrease the,.potentialfor consolidation and. to provide a more uniform and firm bearing support for the proposed structures, we recommend constructing recompacted soil, mats beneath all foundations, and slabs -on - grade. G. The project site is in. seismic Zone 4.as defined in'Section 2312 (d) 2. of the Uniform Building Code: H. It is further recommended that any permanent structure constructed on the site be designed by a qualified professional who is aware of the site's seismic setting. L Adherence to the following grading recommendations should limit potential. settlement problems ,due to seismic forces, heavy rainfall, flooding and the weight of the intended structure J. It is recommended that Buena Engineers, Inc. be retained to provide Geotechnical. Engineering services during - site development; excavation, grading, and foundation construction phases of the work. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications and recommendations, and to allow design changes in. the event that. subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. K. Plans and specifications should be provided to Buena Engineers, Inc. prior to grading. 'Plans should include the grading plans, foundation plans, and foundation details. Preferably; structural loads should be. shown on the foundation plans. July 25, 1991 -8- 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING Prior to any construction operations; areas to be graded should be. cleaned of vegetation and other deleterious materials. Appendix C, 'Standard Grading Specifications' contains specific suggestions for removal and disposal of deleterious substances and, as such, forms `a part of these Site Development and Grading Recommendations. A. Site Development - Grading Site grading and the bottom of all excavations should be observed by a representative of Buena Engineers, Inc.. prior to placement of fill. Local variations in soil conditions may warrant increasing the depth of recompaction and/or overexcavation. 1. Prior to site grading any existing structures; stumps, roots, foundations, pavements, leachfields, uncompacted fill, trash piles, and any abandoned underground utilities should be removed -from the proposed building and paving areas.. The top surface should be stripped of all organic growth and non- complying fill which, along with other debris; should be removed from the site. 2 4. Depressions resulting from these removals should have debris and loose soil removed and be filled with suitable fill soils compacted as recommended. herein. No compacted fill should 'be placed unless the underlying' soil has been. observed by Buena Engineers, Inc. In order to help minimize potential settlement problems associated with structures supported on a non-uniform thickness of compacted fill, Buena Engineers, Inc. should be consulted for site grading recommendations relative., to backfilling large and/or deep depressions resulting from removal under item one above. In general, all proposed construction should be supported by a uniform thickness of compacted soil. Testing -showed the surface soils are quite loose and susceptible to large settlements due to the introduction of water, and the additional loading, `of.structures. To control differential settlement and to produce a more uniform bearing condition we recommend that the structure be supported by a recompacted soil mat.. Compaction is to be verified by testing. 5. Building areas should be overexcavated to a.depth of. four (4) feet, below original grade or the bottom of footings whichever is greater. The exposed surface should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted so that a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density is obtained to a depth of one (1) foot. The .previously removed soil and any fill material should then be placed in eight (8) inch layers in a loose condition at a near optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of July 25, 1991 -9- 87-3119-P1 91-07-778_ ninety (90) percent of maximum density. The intent is to have at least five (5) feet. of soil compacted to a minimum of ninety percent of maximum density compose the building pad beneath the footings. Compaction is to be verified by testing. 6. These grading. recommendations apply to building areas and at least five (5) feet beyond building limits M 7. Auxiliary structures including freestanding or retaining walls should have the existing soils beneath the structure;pcocessed as per items five (5) and six (6), above. The grading requirements apply to three (3) feet beyond the footings. If plans for auxiliary structures and walls are provided for our review, these recommendations may be revised. 8. Itis anticipated that during grading'a loss of approximately one tenth .(. l) of a foot due to stripping, and a shrinkage factor of about twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) percent for the upper five (5) feet of soil, may be used for quantity calculations. This is based on compactive effort needed to produce an average degree of compaction of approximately ninety-three (93) to ninety-four (94) percent and may vary depending on contractor. methods. Subsidence is estimated between one - tenths (.1) to three -tenths (3) of a foot. Site Development - General. }' i 1. The -following" general recommendations .listed in. -this section are in addition to those listed in the 'Grading' `section A above. 2. All rocks larger than eight (8) inches in greatest dimension should be removed from fill or backfill material. 3. Import soil used to raise site grades should,' be. equal to or better than on-site soil in strength, 'expansion, and compressibility characteristics. import soil will not be prequalified by Buena Engineers, Inc. Comments. on the; characteristics of import will be given after the material is on the' project, either in- place -or in stockpiles of adequate quantity, to complete the project. A Areas around the structures should be graded so that drainage is positive. and away from the structures. 'Gutters and down . spouts. should be considered as a way to convey water out of the foundation area. Water should not be :allowed to pond on or near pavement sections. 5. Added moisture within previously compacted fill could result in a number of reactions at the surface depending upon the amount of moisture increase, the in-place density of the soil, in- situ moisture content and soil type. Although the soil could in reality be expanding, collapsing, moving laterally due to the phenomenon 'creep', the result is usually movement and will July. 25, 1991 710- 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 most likely manifest itself visually in structural slabs and street areas as cracks, (horizontal, lateral or vertical displacement). 6. The apparent cure to the problem is to not introduce excess. moisture into fill material once in. place. To help minimize: increased .moistureInto the fill material,, site drainage and landscape is critical. Site drainage should be in the form of roof gutter, concrete brow ditcher, ribbon gutters and gutters, storm a drain nd other drainage devices. Landscaping should. be such that water is not allowed to pond. Additionally, care should be taken so as., not to over water landscaped areas. 7. The Recommended Grading. Specifications included in Appendix C are general guidelines,. only. and should not be Included directly into project specifications without first incorporating the site specific recommendations contained in the Site Development. Grading section .of this report. Chapter 70o f the Uniform Building. Code contains specific considerations for grading. and. is considered a part of the general guidelines. 8. It- is recommended that` Buena Engineers, Inc., be retained to provide soil engineering. services during construction of the grading, excavation, and foundation phases of the work. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications. or recommendations and to allow design changes in the 'event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. C. Excavations 1. All excavations should be made in accordance with applicable regulations. From our site exploration and - knowledge of the general area, we feel there is a potential for construction problems involving caving of relatively deep site excavations (i.e. utilities,. etc.). Where such situations are encountered, lateral bracing or appropriate cut slopes should be provided. 2. No- surcharge loads should be .allowed within a horizontal distance measured from the top of the excavation slope, equal to the depth of the excavation. D. Traffic Areas 1 Curbs and streets should be provided with one (1) foot of subgrade compacted 'to ninety (90) percent of maximum . density.: 2. On-site parking should be ,provided with one (1) foot of subgrade compacted to ninety (90) percent of maximum density. July 25, 1991 11- 87-3119-P1 91-07-778 3. Final preparation- of: subgrade will depend on paving section designs, 4. Sidewalks should be provided with one .(1) foot of subgrade compacted to ninety (90) percent of maximum density. E. Utility Trenches L Backfill'of utilities within road right-of-way shouldbe placed in strict conformance with the requirements of , the governing agency (Water District, Road, Department, etc.). 2 Utility trench backfill within private property. should be placed in strict conformance with the provisions of this.report relating to minimum compaction standards. In general, service lines extending inside of property may be backfilled with .native soils compacted to .a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density. 3. Backfill operations should be observed and tested by Buena Engineers, Inc.,. to monitor. compliance with these recommendations. STRUCTURES Based upon the results of this evaluation, it our opinion that the structure foundation can be supported by compacted soils placed as recommended above. A Foundations If is- anticipated that foundations wilt be placed on firm compacted soils as . recommended elsewhere in. this report., The - recommendations that follow .are based on' 'very low' expansion category .soils. 1. Table 2 gives specific recommendations for width, depth and reinforcing. Other structural. considerations may be more stringent and would govern in any case. A minimum footing depth of twelve (12) inches below lowest adjacent grade for one (1) story structures and eighteen (18) inches for two (2) story structures should be maintained. 2. Conventional Foundations: Estimated bearing "values are given below for foundations on. recompacted soils, assuming import fill (if required) to be equal to or better than site soils: a. Continuous foundations of one (1) foot wide and twelve (12) inches below grade: vvwVV %01 %.A . i. 1800 psf for dead plus, reasonable live loads. H.' 2400 psf for wind and, seismic considerations.. 3. Allowable -increases of 200 psf per one (1)' foot of additional footing width and 300 psf for each additional six '(6) inches of footing depth may be used. The maximum allowable bearing will be 2500 psf: The allowable bearing values` indicated have been determined based upon anticipated maximum loads indicated in the 'Introduction' section of this report. If the, Indlcated loading - is exceeded then the allowable bearing values and the grading requirements must be 'reevaluated. by r, the soil engineer. ' 4. Although footing reinforcement may not be required per. Table 2;:. nominal reinforcement should .be considered to reduce•the potential for cracking ,due -to .temperature: and shrinkage stresses and in order to span surface- imperfections. Other requirements that are more stringent -due to, structural loads will x govern: 5. Soils beneath footings and slabs should be premoistened prior to placing,. concrete. 6. Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction on floor slabs and'' foundations and by passive, resistance of. the soils acting on foundation stem walls. Lateral capacity is based partially on the assumption that any required backfill adjacent to K foundations and grade beams is properly. compacted. 7. Foundation excavations should:be visually .observed by the soil engineer during excavation and prior 'to placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. Local variations in conditions may warrant deepening of footings. 8. Allowable bearing values: are net (weight of footing and soil surcharge may be neglected) and, are applicable for dead plus reasonable live loads.. • B. Slabs -on -Grade y 1. Concrete slabs-on-gradeshould be 'supported by compacted structural 'fill, placed in accordance with applicable sections of. this report;: 2. In areas of moisture sensitive floor coverings, `an appropriate vapor barrier should be installed in order to ,minimize vapor July 25,1991 -13 137-311.9-P1 91-07-778 transmission from the subgrade soil to the slab. We would. suggest that the floor slabs be. underlain by a four (4) .inch thick layer of gravel or by an impermeable membrane as a capillary break. A suggested gradation for the gravel layer would be as follows: Sieve Size Percent Passing 3/4' 90 - 100 No. 100 0 3 ����,;---------- .= ..._ If a membrane isused, a low -slump concrete should be used to help minimize shrinkage. The membrane should be covered with two (2) inches of sand to help protect it during. construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the. concrete. 3. Reinforcement- of . slab -on -grade is contingent upon the structural engineers recommendations and the expansion index of the supporting soil. Since the mixing- of: fill soil with native -so! ' I could change the expansion index, additional tests should bconducted, during rough grading to determine the expansion index of the subgrade soil: Additional reinforcement due to the expansion index of the site soil should be provided as recommended . in Section G ..below. Additional reinforcement may also,be required by the structural engineer. 4. -It -.is recommended. that ' the , proposed '"perimeter slabs (sidewalks, patios, etc.), be designed relatively independent of foundation stems (free-floating) to help mitigate 'cracking due to foundation settlement and/or expansion. C. Settlement Considerations.. 1. Estimated settlement, based on footings founded- on firm 'soils .as recommended, should be less than one O inch*'Differential settlement between exterior and interior bearing members should be less than one-half 0 /2) inch. 2.: The majority of settlement should 'occurduring construction. D. frictional and Lateral.Coefficients 1. Resistance to lateral loading 7may be .provided by friction.' acting on the base of foundations; a coefficient of friction .of .46 may be used for dead load forces. 2: Passive resistance acting -on the sides of foundation stems equal to 300 pcf of equivalent fluid weight,, may be included for resistance to lateral, loading., July 25, 1991 -14- 87-3119-P1 91-07-778 3.. Passive resistance of soils against grade beams and' the frictional resistance between the floor slabs and the supporting soils may be combined in determining the total lateral resistance, however the friction factor should be reduced to .33 of dead load forces. 4. A one4hird (1/3) increase in the quoted passive value may be used. for wind or seismic loads. E. Retaining Walls 1, For cantilever retaining walls backfilled with compacted native soils, it is recommended that .an equivalent. fluid pressure of thirty-five (35) pcf be used for well drained level backfill conditions: Z The lateral earth pressure to be resisted by the retaining walls or similar structures should be increased to allow for surcharge loads. The surcharge considered should include the loads from any structures or temporary loads that would influence the wall design. 3. A backdrain or an equivalent system of backfill drainage should be. incorporated into the' retaining. wall design. Backfill immediately behind the retaining structure should be a fee- draining granular material. Alternately,. the back-of the wall could be lined with a geodrain system. • 4. Compaction on the retained side of the wall within a horizontal distance equal` to one (1) wall height should be performed by hand-operated or other light- weight compaction equipment. This is intended to reduce potential 'locked-in" lateral pressures caused by compaction with heavy,grading equipment. 5. Water should not be allowed to pond near the top of the wall. To accomplish this the final backfill site grade should be such that all water is diverted away from the retaining wall. R. Slope Stability Slope stability calculations were not performed due .to the anticipated minimal slope height (less that 6). If slopes exceed five. (5) feet, .engineering calculations should be performed to substantiate the stability of slopes steeper than 2 to 1. fill slopes. should be overfilled and. trimmed back to competent material. G. Expansion The design of foundations should be based_ on .the weighted expansion index (UBC Standard No. 29-2) of the soil. As stated in the soil properties section, the 'expansion index of,the .surface soil is in. the very: low (0-20) tolow (21-50) classification. During site preparation, if the °soil is. thoroughly mixed and , additional fill is added, the expansion index may change. Therefore, the July 25, 1991 -is- 137-3119-P1 91-07-778 expansion index should be evaluated after the site preparation has been completed, and the final foundation design adjusted accordingly. H. Additional Services This report is based on the assumption that an adequate program of client consultation, construction monitoring and testing will be performed during the final design and construction phases to check compliance with these recommendations. Maintaining Buena Engineers, Inc., as the soil engineering firm from beginning to end of the project will help assure continuity of services. Construction monitoring and testing would be additional services provided by our firm. The costs of these services are not included in our present fee arrangements. The recommended tests and observations include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: 1. Consultation during the final design stages of the project. 2. Review of the building plans to observe that recommendations of our report have been properly implemented into the design. 3. Observation and testing during site preparation, grading and placement of engineered fill. 4. Consultation as required during construction. The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part upon the data obtained from the twelve (12) borings performed on the site. The nature and extent of variations between the borings may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. Findings of this report are valid as of this date. However, changes in conditions of a property can occur with passage of time whether they be due to natural processes or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of eighteen (18) months. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the building are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to insure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project and are incorporated into the plans, and specifications for the project. It is also the owners responsibility, July 25, 1991.. -16= 87-3119-P1 91-07-778 or his representative, to insure that the necessary steps, are taken to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. It Is further understood that the owner or his, representative' is responsible for submittal of` this report to the appropriate governing agencies. - Buena Engineers, Inc., has prepared this report for the exclusive use of the. client and authorized agents.. This report has been prepared in— accord ' ance n .accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, either expressed or implied,. are made as the professional advice provided under the terms of chis, agreement,. and included in the report. It is recommended that Buena.. Engineers, Inc., be, provided the opportunity for a general review of final design. and specifications in order that: earthwork and " foundation recommendations, may be properly, interpreted and implemented in the design,and specifications. If Buena Engineers, Inc., is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no .'responsibility -for misinterpretation of our recommendations. Our scope of services did 'not include any environmental assessment or investigation to determine the presence of hazardous, or toxic materials ' in the soil,. surface water, groundwater or air,. on, below or around this site. Prior to purchase or development of this site, we suggest that an environmental assessment be conducted- which addresses environmental concerns. END OF TEXT Appendices 4. " I � � ,00ro tfwne �ti gi 1 . APPROXIMATE 46A04 LOCATIONS ch t, z N '` Calle Tampico-Shopping Center Date: 6/21/91 Location:,Per..Plan BORING NO. 1 File No. B7-3119-P1 E DESCRIPTION o a C m REMARKSiss ' C. D 0 B1 Brown clayey very -ML ' sandy silt - 29'. 91.7. 0.9 79' ' 5 33 i8.8 `1.6 85 At Brown slightly clayey SM _ - silty very fine to fine 1, 0 sand 41 _ . t Scattered Bt layers 15 50/6' Less silt 20.50/8, 101.5 1.4 89 Abundant interbedded • •i • 81. layers. 25 - 50/a 1 80.6- 7.5 70 Interbedded. B1 layers 30 50/10 ' ? Abundantinterbedded ' = = } B1 layers througout remaining depth 35 40 " .' 36 . 93:8 25.8 82 45 •- 50 `34 Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 50' - ring sample . No Free Water ' ® No Bedrock No recovery 55 Note: The, stratification lines represent the - approximate, boundaries between the soil types; the 60 transitions may be gradual. t Calle. Tampico Shopping Center', ; • Date: 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 2. File No. B7 -3119-P1 a12 E o' DESCRIPTION y REMARKS m C V Oco ZN. C O ¢ C p a.. 0 131: Brown clayey very ML. `. - 28 sandy siltScattered 83.7 3:8., '72, interbedded fine. sand layers 5 33 .. { - A2 Grey brown slightly Sivl 1 0 silty very fine to fine - - 39sand 90.9- 2..7 t31 Interbedded 61 layers : 15 26 Trace thin silt layers _ Abundant silt. layers 20 - throughout remaining, depth . 31 25 _. 82 3191.9 3 0 30 23. F Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 31' " ring sample No Free Water _. 35 f ® ' No Bedrock No. recovery 40 45 • Note: The stratification - lines represent the - approximate boundaries between the soil types; the 50 _ = _ transitions may be gradual. Calle Tampico Shopping Center Date: 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 3 File No. B7 -3119-P1 ^ E 3 DESCRIPTION � o. o` m g. REMARKS . ID �. to �. 0o N _ r .: o g oC E U ' o o 0 .. B1: Brown clayey very ML sandy silt y 30 29 96.6 2.2 84 Interbedded sand layers Al Brown slightly clayey' SM' silty very fine. to fine 10 2 -sand 6 ` 1 ti 42 Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 16' - - ring sample - No Free Water 2.0 ' ' r No Bedrock No recovery. 25 30 35 40 45 F Note: The stratification - lines represent the.. - - approximate boundaries. 11' .between the soil types; the LO - - transitions may be gradual. Calle Tampica Shopping Center Date:., 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 4' File No..87-3119-P1 ^ LE a .- o m o DESCRIPTION- ~ REMARKS pc CO U ° o �.c ° cc .. o -0-00 0 Interbedded Bt layers. : 21 82.8 ' 0.9 72 Al Brown slightly clayey SM �- 5. Z. silty very fine to fine 19 sand96.1 1'.4, 84 Silt layers 10. W 14 88:2 1.0 77 15,26 L Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 16' - ring sample No Free Water No Bedrock 2.0 ® No recovery 25 4 30 35 . 40 . 45. S ; 50 Calle Tampico Shopping" Center Date: 6/21/91, location: Per Plan " BORING NO. 5— • File No. B7 -3119-P1 mE DESCRIPTIONo o m. REMARKS M- tr E O. o a (� 0 B 1 : Brown clayeyvery ML r _ sandy silt 24 Al: SM 87.:g .0.9 77" 5 50/10- B-1 Brown clayey very ML. 96,1, 7.6 83' . saridY silt 10 - 30 Al Brown slightly clayey SM Interbedded Bt layers _ silty very fine to fine sand 1 5. 45 - Relatively- undisturbed Total Depth = 16' ring sample . No Free Water No Bedrock 20 No recovery 25 _ 30 35 40 ` 45 :. - Note: The stratification - w lines represent the . - approximate boundaries v between the soil types; the. 50 transitions may be gradual. a Calle 'Tampico. shopping Center Date: 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan. BORING NO. 6 File No. 137-3119-131 ^ m � O` E m DESCRIPTION., ' o m :.o c 4D 0 REMARKS _ o o 131: Brown: clayey very MC _ sandy silt i 5, - A 1 Brown slightly. clayey' SM silty very fine to fine ;. sand to Interbedded 131 layers r" 15 Total Depth = 1 S' • No Free Water No Bedrock 20 2SI~ 30 3S _ • 40 - r _ Note: The stratification - _ lines' represent the - - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the so transitions may be gradual. " Calle Tampico Shopping Center • Date: 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. _7 File No. B7-3119-P1 o 3 DESCRIPTION a o m o c m ° �. t REMARKS W =c g cc o i' 0 B,1: Brown clayey very, . ML sandy silt 33 87.6 1.8 7:6 5 - 31I` 83.4 -1.2,. 72 - Scattered sand layers 10 32 - A 1 Brown slightly clayey . SM silty. very fine to fine 1 5 36 sand Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 16' - - ring Sample'. No Free Water, ® -No Bedrock 20 No recovery 25 30 35 40 s 45 . Note: The stratification. - lines represent the . approximate boundaries • between the soil types; the LLO_ " transitions may be gradual. Calle Tampico Shopping Center • Date: 6/21/91 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 8 File No. 137-3119-P1 R o m 3 DESCRIPTION o o , •REMARKS' 0 CO Z Cr o o v 0 - 131: Brown clayey very. MC - sandy silt 96.1 5.7 84 - 22' Al Brown slightly clayey" SM silty very fine to fine 5'3 _ 5 sand 93:9 3.0 82 , A2 Grey brown slightly SM 10 _ 50/9' silty very fine to fine sand 1 5 -:M'33 N' Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 16' - - ring sample No Free Water No Bedrock 20 No recovery 25 30 35 40 45 V - Note: The stratification lines represent the • approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 _ transitions may be gradual. Calle Tampico Desert. Villas Date: 6/24/91 Location: Per PlanBORING NO. 9 Fite No. B7 -3119-P1 a� E0 3 DESCRIPTION ` . o H '� REMARKS b c Q , o o X U B 1: Brown clayey very ML _ '26. sandy- silt 86.6 2.7 75 5 _ 40 - + 91,8 5.5 79 Scattered sand layers, _ At Brown slightly clayey SM Interbedded B1 10 silty very fine to fine layers throughout 48 sand 96:7 1.7- 84 _ A2,.Grey brown -slightlySM _ silty very fine to fine 15' 50/10 sand . ` Al Brown slightly clayey S_ M 83.0 4.3 72 Trace coarse sand -i silty very fine to fine sand Trace silt layers 20 50/11' Scattered 61 layers Relatively 'undisturbed Total Depth = 21' - ring sample-: No. Free Water • ® " No Bedrock 25 No recovery 4 30 35 40 45 - Note: The stratification - lines represent the - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 transitions may be gradual. ` Calle- Tampico Desert Villas • Date: -6/24/91 ..Location: Per Plan- - BORING NO. 10 File No. B7 -3119-P1. DESCRIPTION' o' o A 8 REMARKS CD p ro �.. o C0 .. c g CD oC E c 0 Al Brown slightly clayey SM - silty very fine to fine ;23 sand 93.9• 2.9 82 Abundant Bt layers 5 21 99.8 0.9 89 - A2 Grey brown slightly SM - silty- very fine to fine - sand - Scattered B1 layers 10 24 15 - 40101.3 Al: SM 4.7 88 Scattered 131 layers Relatively undisturbed - Total ;Depth = 16' ring sample ,: No Free- Water No Bedrock . 26 ® No recovery " . 25 - 3.0 y 3.5 40 45 - Note: The stratification - lines represent. the . - approximate boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 transitions may be" gradual. 5 _ _ 10 15 Calle Tam ico DesertVillas ' Date: 6/24/91 Location:- Per Plan BORING• NO. 11. ' File No. B7 -3119-P1 .. o 105.6 1.0 1.5;' DESCRIPTION Scattered B1 layers throughout o m o c m.. o > �. A � . REMARKS o . Total Depth a 16' . . Co. °; o No Free Water - 20 ®, No Bedrock. 0 • A 1 Brown . slightly, clayey SM silty very. fine to fine 25 1:1 sand - 88.8' 2.8 7 7 Scattered B1. layers 30 5 _ _ 10 15 - 15 2796.0 27 - A2 Grey brown slightly silty very fine. to fine. sand SM 105.6 1.0 1.5;' 85 94 Scattered B1 layers throughout Relatively undisturbed Total Depth a 16' . . ring; sample No Free Water - 20 ®, No Bedrock. No recovery 25 30 35 40: 45 - Note: .The stratification - lines represent the - approximate, boundaries - between the soil types; the 50 transitions may be gradual. Calle Tampico Desert- Villas ' Dater 6/24/91. Location: Per Plan BORING :NO. 12 File No. B7 -3119-P1 . DESCRIPTION:. ..o . C..0 a _ REMARKS o— v co O �. n. '0 �, o a:o �,. o o'v Al Brown slightly clayey SM silty. very: fine. to fine Scattered B1 layers 12 sand `: 90. T 3.2 ' 79, 5i 18 •� X1.01'.0 '0.5.' 90 f ` - A2 Grey brown slightly SM - silty very fine to fine ' sand Abundant 131 -layers 10 22 87,.0.. 1.4 ` 77: throughout remaining depth , 50/10 . Relatively. undisturbed. Total Depth = 16' . _ _ rinA Samniw _ iNn 1=rPA WatAr ' .' July.25, 1991 _ B-1 87-3119-P1 � 91-07-778 TEST RESULTS Scattered . - BORING/DEPTH 1 @"0-5` 1 @ 6-10" 2 @ 7-10' Clay Layers USCS ML SM SM, CL SOIL DESIGNATION.. 131 'Al A2` C1 MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) 115.5 114.6 112.4 ---- OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%) -12.8, .13.3 12.5 ---- ANGLE.OF INT: TRIC. 330 310 ---- ---- - COHESION (psf) 30 70- 0 EXPANSION EXPANSION INDEX .22 � 8 ' ---- ---- GRAIN,SIZE DISTRIBUTION (%) GRAVEL ' 0.00.0 0.0 0:0 SAND" 34.T -57.3. 78.8 4.0 SILT 37.7 28.3'' 14.1 30.7 CLAY 27.61 14.4 7.1 ..65.3 SOIL DESCRIPTIONS: Al: Brown slightly clayey silty very fine to fine sand (SM) A2: Grey brown slightly silty very fine to fine sand (SM) 131: Brown. clayey very sandy silt (ML) Cl: Brown very: silty clay (CL). July. 25, 199.1 B-2 B7 -3119-P1 , 91-07-778 IN-PLACE DENSITIES;, RELATIVE BORING & DEPTH, DRY DENSITY % MOISTURE COMPACTION 1 @ 2.0 91.7 0.9' . 79% 5.0 98.8 .1.6 . 85% 20.0 101.5 1A $9% 25.0 80.6: 7.5: 70% 40.0 93.8 25.8 82% 50..0 ---- 11.9 ---- 2 @ 2.0 83.7 3.8 . 72% 10.0 90.9 2.7: 81% 25.0 91:9 3.0 82% 305.0 96:6' 2.2 84% 4 @ 2.0 82.8 ' ` 0.9 72% 5.0 96.1 1.4 84% 10.0 88'.2 _1.0. 77% 5 @ 2:0 87:9 0.9 77% 5:.0 96.3 7.6 83% 7 @ 2.0 - 87:6 1.8 76% 83.4 1.2 ' 72% 8.@ 2.0 96.1 .5.7 84% 5.0 _ 93.9 " 3.0 82% 15.0 103.1 0.8 92% 9 @ 2.0 86.6 2.7 75% . 6.0 91..8 5.5 79% 10.0 96.7 1*.7 84% 15.0 83.0 :: 4.3 72% 10 @ 2.0.., 93.9 2.9 $2% 5.0 99.80.9 89% 15.0 101.3. 4.7 88%. 1'1 @ 2.0 88.8 2.8 77% . 10.0 96.0 .1.0 85% 15.0 105.6. 1.5 94% 12 @ 2.0 90.7.. 3.2 - 79%. 5.0 101.0` 0.5 90% 10:0 87.0' 77% 15.0 95.7 1.3 85% i i F., _ � .. -`;" B7-31 19-P 1 40 3.5 3.0 w 2.5 cncc w 2.0 0 z a 1.5 w s 1.0 0.5 r B7-31 19-P1 . . 4.0 3.5. 3.0 w - a Y 2.5 cc w 20 c7 z cc 1, 5 . a B7-31 19-P1 . . TABLE NO. 2 MINIMUM FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS" (1). (10) Footings for slab & Raised Floor Systems (2) (5) (10) Concrete Slabs 3 1/2" Minimum Thickness All Perimeter Interior footings Wei hted g Expansion y m _ ` y o L N m Footings (6) for slab and s raised floors Premoistening control for footings, =—Index. - .. _s_._._...•_... (6) Reinforcement Reinforcements 'Total""' soils under " ' " Piers under . . _ — — g' P iers and slabs raised floors. o for continuous (4) .. thickness (5) (6) ; E Depth below natural of sand ca surface surface of ground footings .. , Inches and finish grade (3) (8) r INCHES 0-20 Very low 1 2 6 8 12 15 6 7 12 12 . None ' None . 2 Moistening of ground to Piers allowed (on -3 10 18 8 18 24 18, 24 Required Required „Prior placing concrete for single expansive) . recommended floor loads only `21-50 Low 1 2 6- 8 12. .6 :7 15 18 12 144 top 6X6- 120% of optimum moisture " Pie`rs allowed 3 10 ,15 18 8 24 18 _ 24 ` and bottom 10/10 content to a depth of 21" P for single +floor 4 . below, lowest adjacent grade. ' r bads only Testing Required 6X6- 51-90 1 2 6 8 12 12 6 8 21 21 12 18 1 44 top and bottom 6l6 WWF or #3 bars 130% of optimum moisture Piers not ' Medium 3 10 15 8 24 24 @ 24' e.w.below 4 content to depth of 2T lowest adjacent grade: ;j allowed #3 bars @24" in exterior footing Testing Required and bent 3' into.slab 9 6X5- 91-130 1 2 6 8 12 12 6 8 27 12 1-05 top 6/6 WWF 140° of optimum moisture High 3 10 15 8 27 18 and bottom or #3 bars 4 content to a depth of 33" Piers not 27 24 24" e.w below lowest adjacent grade. allowed #3 bars @ 24" in exterior footing Testing Required and bent 3' into slab 9 Abov130 Very High SPECIAL DESIGN BY LICENSED ENGINEER/ARCHITECT 01109i90/SS neier to next page ►or wornoies. ti) mrougn tiu) FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 2 1. Premoistening is required where. specified in. Table 2 in order to achieve maximum and uniform expansion of soils prior to construction and thus limit structural distress caused by uneven expansion and:- shrinkage. Other systems which do not include premoistening may be approved by the Building Official when such alternatives are shown to provide equivalent safeguards against adverse effects of expansive soils. ; 2 Underfloor, access 'crawl holes shall., be provided with curbs extending not less than six (6) inches above adjacent grade to prevent surface water:from entering the foundation'area. 3. Reinforcement for continuous foundations shall be placed not less than three (3) inches above the bottom of the footings and not less than three (3) inches below the top of the stem. 4. Reinforcement shall .be placed at mid -depth of slab. a After premoistening, the specified moisture content of soils shall be maintained until concrete is .placed. Required moisture content -shall be verified by an approved testing. laboratory not more than twenty-four (24) hours prior to placement of concrete. 6. Crawl spaces under raised floors need not be premoistened except under interior footings: ' Interior -footings which are not enclosed by a continuous perimeter foundation system or equivalent concrete or masonry, moisture barrier complying with UBC Section 2907, (b) shall be- designed and constructed as specified' for perimeter footings in Table. Z. 7. A grade beam not less than twelve (12) inches by twelve (12).inches in cross section, reinforced as specified for continuous foundations in Table 2 shall be provided at garage door openings. 8. Foundation stem walls. which exceed a height of three (3) times the stem thickness above lowest adjacent grade shall be reinforced in accordance with Sections 2418' and 2614 in the UBC or as required - by engineering design, whichever is more restrictive. 9. Bent reinforcing bars, between exterior footing and slab shall be omitted when floor is designed as an independent, "floating" slab. 10. Fireplace -footings shall be reinforced with a horizontal grid .located three (3).inches above the bottom -of the footingand consisting of not less than number four (#4) bars at twelve (12) inches on center each way... Vertical chimney reinforcing bars shall be hooked under the grid; BUENA ENGINE.ER.S; INC July 25, 1.991 C-1 137-3119-1`1 91-07-778 STANDARD GRADING SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT: CALLE TAMPICO SHOPPING CENTER CLIENT: THE KOENIG COMPANIES 1. These Standard Grading Specifications have been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to referenced project in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Z These specifications shall be integrated with the Engineering Report of which they are a part. Should conflicting statements be found between these. standard specifications and. the itemized recommendations contained in the main body of the engineering report, the latter shall govern. 3. Buena Engineers, Inc., referred to as the soil engineer, should be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during construction of the grading, excavation and..foundation phases of the work. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and .to allow design changes in the event that subsurface; conditions differ from that anticipated prior to start of construction. 4. The presence of our field representative will be for the purpose of providing observation and field testing. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work ' of the contractor, his employees or agents. The contractor for this project should be so advised. The contractor should: also be informed that neither the presence of our field representative nor the observation and testing by our firm shall excuse him in any way from defects discovered in his work. It is understood that. our firm will not be responsible for job or site., safety on this project. Job and site safety will, be the sole responsibility of the contractor. 5. If the contractor encounters subsurface conditions at the site that (a) are materially different from those indicated in the contract plans or in specifications, or (b) could not have been reasonably anticipated as inherent in the work of the character provided in the contract, the contractor shall immediately notify the. owner verbally and in writing within 24 hours. This notification shall be a condition precedent before any negotiations -for 'changed or differing site conditions' can proceed. If the owner determines that conditions do materially so differ and cause an increase or decrease in the contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work under this contract, then negotiations shall w July,25, 1991 C=2 67-3119-P1 91-07-778 commence between owner and contractor to provide equitable adjustment to owner or contractor resulting therefrom. 6. Whenever the words 'supervision' 'inspection', or 'control' appear they shall mean periodic observation of the work and the taking of soil. tests as deemed necessary.. by the soil engineer for substantial compliance with plans, specifications and' design concepts. 7. These specifications shall consist of clearing, and ' grubbing, preparation of land to be filled, filling of the :land, spreading, compaction and control of the fill, and subsidiary work necessary to complete the grading of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. 8. The standard test used .to define minimum densities of compaction work .shall be the ASTM Test Procedure D 1557. Densities shall be expressed as a relative compaction in terms of the maximum density obtained in the laboratory. by the foregoing standard procedure. 9. Field density tests will be performed by the soil engineer during grading operations. At least one (1) test shall be made for each five hundred (500) cubic yards or fraction thereof placed with a minimum of two (2) tests per layer _in isolated areas, Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to. a depth of several inches.,Density tests shall, be taken in compacted material below the distrbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion. thereof is below the required density,. the particular layer. or portion shall be reworked until the required density has been obtained. 10. Earth -moving and working operations shall be controlled to -,prevent water from running into excavated areas. Excess water shall be promptly removed and* the site kept dry. Fill material shall not be placed, spread or rolled during unfavorable weather. conditions. When- the work is interrupted by heavy rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field - tests by the soil engineer indicate that the moisture content and.density of the fill areas previously specified. 11: Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, vibrating sheepsfoot rollers, multiple -wheel pneumatic -tired rollers or other types of acceptable compacting rollers,. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is within the specified moisture content range. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire, area and the roller•shall make sufficient trips to insure that the required density has been obtained. July 25, 1991- C-3 67-3119-P1 91-07-778 12. Existing structures, foundations, trash; debris, loose fill,. trees (not included in landscaping), roots, tree remains and other- rubbish shall be removed, piled or burned or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas that have been disturbed with a neat and finished appearance free from debris.. No burning shall be permitted in the area to be filled. 13. When fill material includes rock, large rocks will not be allowed to nest and voids must be carefully filled with small stones or earth and properly compacted. Rock larger than eight (8) inches in diameter will not be permitted in the compacted fill without review -as to location by the soil engineer. 14. Organic matter shall be removed from the surface upon'which the fill, foundations or pavement sections are to be placed. The surface shall then be. plowed or scarified to a depth of at least eight (8) Inches and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks or . other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. Specific recommendations pertaining to stripping and minimum depth of fecompaction of native soils are -presented in the main body of the soil report. 15. Native soil free from organic material and other deleterious material; may be used as compacted fill; however, during grading. operations the soil engineer will re-examine the native soils for organic content. 16. Imported material should be tested and reviewed by Buena Engineers, Inc., before being brought to the site. The materials used shall be free from organic matter and other deleterious material. - 17. Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, greater than ten (10) percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm undisturbed natural ground to provide a horizontal base so that each layer is placed. and compacted on .a horizontal plane. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least ten (10) feet -in width on firm, undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the toe stake Placed* at the natural angle of repose or design slope. The width and frequency of succeeding benches will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. 18. The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted; shall not exceed six (6) inches in thickness. Layers shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade -mixed during spreading. After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to a relative compaction of not less than ninety. (90) percent. The fill operation shall be continued in six ,(6) inch compacted layers, as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and graded as shown on the accepted pians. RIIPMA FAIf'IMPCQ¢ I.Nr July 25; 1991 C-4 .. 137-3119-P1 10 • 9 - 7-778 19-,When the moisture content of the fill material 'is not sufficient. to achieve required compaction, water shall be added until the soils attain a.. moisture , content. so that thorough bonding is achieved during the .compacting process. When the: moisture content of the fill. material is excessive, the fill material shall -be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods untilthe ' moisture content is reduced to an acceptable content to achieve proper compaction: - 20. Existing septic tanks and other underground storage tanks must be removed from the site prior to commencement of building, g grading or fill, operations. Underground tanks, including connecting drain fields and other lines, must be totally removed and the resulting. depressions properly reconstructed and filled.: Depressions left from tree removal shall also. be properly filled and compacted: , 21. The methods -for removal of subsurface irrigation and utility. lines will depend on the depth and location- of the line. One of the following methods may be used: 1) Remove the pipe and compact the soil in- the trench according to the applicable portions of these grading recommendations, 2) The pipe shall be crushed in the trench. The- trench shall then be filled and compacted according to the 4 applicable portions of these grading specifications, 3) Cap the ends -of the line with, concrete to mitigate entrance of water. The length of the cap shall not be less than-. five (5) feet. The concrete mix shall have a minimum shrinkage. 22. Abandoned water wells on the site shall be capped according- to the requirements of the appropriate regulatory agency. The strength of the cap shall be at least equal to the adjacent soils. The final elevation of the top. of the well casing must be a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches below adjacent grade prior to grading or fill oWwa ions. Structure foundations, should not be placed over the capped well. - 4. CF �S 78495CALLE TAMPICO — LA :QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (619) 777-7000 of FAX., (619) 777-7101 November 15, 1994 ' Ms. Laurie Burke Laurie's Permit Service 3320 East Chapman Avenue, #281 Orange, CA 92669 y SUBJECT: SIGN PERMIT REQUEST FOR MONUMENT SIGNS AT LA QUINTA VILLAGE. (SA 94-264) Dear Ms. Burke: This is. to inform you, that we have approved. your request for two monument signs 'at the La Quinta Center per your submitted plans with, one exception. Pursuant to a discussion with Mr.. Kevin McConnell of Signs and Services Company, we have added a note that the support column bases for the signs will be tiled .per the approved the sign program. Mr. McConnell indicated that his company does not do tile work but that it will be done by the tile contractor. This is to inform..you that the tile work will :need to be done prior to .final approval of the constructed -signs. Should you have anyquestions regarding the above, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, JERRY HERMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STAN B. SAWA Principal Planner SBS:bjs c: Mr. John Koenig, The Koenig:, Companies; Mr.' Kevin McConnell, Signs and Services cBuilding�&_Safe_ty,Departmen�t MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1504— - .LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 LTRSS.574 . - .. 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO —,'LA _61.1INTA, CALIFORNIA' 92253 (619) 777=7000 - OF fR4.�i `FAX (619) 777-7101 November 7, 1994 Ralphs Qrocery Store 1100 W. Artesia -Blvd. Compton, CA 90220 To. Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed A copy. of your permit issued for the Ralphs Grocery,Store in the La Quinta-Village Shops on Washington Street in La Quinta, California. During a recent internal audit, it was- determined that, your. fees for S.M.I. (Strong Motion . Instrumentation) and Arts in Public Places were calculated at the residential rate instead of the appropriate commercial fate. The correct commercial rates are. as -follows: S.M.I. = valuation X .00021, Arts in Public Places,- valuation X .005.. The breakdown for both fees is as shown below, with.the amounts due as shown. We will require the balance, of these fees prior to .providing any 'Certificates of Occupancy. Actual Charges Amount Due S.M.I. 511.56 243.60 .267.96 AJ.P.P.: 12,180.00 5,840.00 6.340.00 • .. Please accept my apology for any inconvenience this may cause you. Sincerely, BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT - Mark Harold Building_ Inspector lI _ Enclosure cc: Jerry Herman; Director of Community Development- MAILING "ADDRESS. -. P.O. .:BOX 1504 'LA fOUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253