Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2014 06 24 PC
T4ht 4 eCPQuiKrw Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are now available on the City's web page: www.la-quinta. org PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 2014 AT 7:00 P.M. Beginning Resolution No. 2014-014 CALL TO ORDER 1 . Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of the minutes of June 10, 2014. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Executive Assistant prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1 JUNE 24, 2014 you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. Continued from June 10, 2014 - Environmental Assessment 2014-636 and Amended Final Map 32742 submitted by Monterra Properties, LLC proposing to reconfigure a previously approved 14-acre, 40 single-family residential lot subdivision in order to relocate the primary access from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park Road while maintaining an exit -only access on Monroe Street. Project: Monterra (TR 32742). CEQA: Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004-515 has been prepared for consideration. Location: east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard. 2. Sign Permit Application 2014-1787 submitted by Swain Sign Inc. proposing a sign program for Extra Space Storage located on the northeast corner of Adams Street and Corporate Center Drive (46-600 Adams Street). BUSINESS SESSION CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL COMMISSIONER ITEMS Report on City Council meeting of June 17, 2014. 2. Commissioner Wilkinson is scheduled to attend the July 1, 2014, City Council meeting. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on July 8, 2014 commencing at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, Executive Assistant of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting was posted on the inside of the north entry to the La Quinta Civic Center at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at 78-630 Highway 1 1 1, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on June 19, 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 JUNE 24, 2014 DATED: June 19, 2014 MONIKA RADEVA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Commission, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Executive Assistant for distribution. It is requested that this take place- prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development Department's counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 JUNE 24, 2014 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2014 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairperson Barrows. PRESENT: Commissioners Blum, Weber, Wilkinson, Vice Chair Wright, and Chairperson Barrows ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Les Johnson, Planning Manager David Sawyer, Principal Engineer Ed Wimmer, Attorney Peter Howell with Rutan and Tucker, LLP, Consultant Principal Planner Nicole Criste, Associate Planner Jay Wuu, Executive Assistant Monika Radeva, and Office Assistant Beatrice Acosta Commissioner Wilkinson led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT Public Speaker: Ms. Andrea Spirtos, Investment Advisory Board Member, La Quinta, CA - introduced herself and thanked Chairperson Barrows and Commissioner Weber for their loyal service on the La Quinta Planning Commission over the years. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of May 13, 2014 as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Blum, Wilkinson, Vice Chair Wright, and Chairperson Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Weber. ABSTAIN: None. PUBLIC HEARINGS Commissioner Weber joined the Commission at 7:02 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 JUNE 10, 2014 1 . Environmental Assessment 2013-633, Specific Plan 2006-081 , Amendment 1, and Site Development Permit 2013-937 submitted by West Coast Housing Partners LLC for the consideration of a specific plan amendment and a site development permit to allow construction of 74 single-family homes on 28.3 acres. Project: Canyon Ridge. CEQA: reviewed under Environmental Assessment 2006-579; no changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. Location: west side of Washington Street, north of Avenue 48 (extended). Consultant Principal Planner Nicole Criste presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Discussion followed regarding environmental review conducted in reference to the stability of the required retaining wall along the western edge of the site and the protection it would provide from any possible rocks falling; the proposed street accesses for the project from Washington Street and Avenue 48, the threshold for street improvement requirements, drainage, landscape lighting, light fixtures, and noise levels. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 7:31 p.m. Public Speaker: Mr. Whit Hollis, Applicant with West Coast Housing Partners, LLC., Westlake Village, CA - introduced himself, gave a presentation of the proposed project, including details regarding the retention wall and requested that the trees identified in condition of approval 3-A be removed from the proposed wall's landscaping palette due to erosion concerns and the word "wall" in same condition be replaced with the word "system" which would give staff and the applicant flexibility in designing the wall. He said the applicant had also inherited and existing agreement with the church located to the north of the property which was entered into by the previous owner, and both the applicant and the church were working together on ensuring the agreement was complied with. He also answered the Commission's questions in regards to the project's access along Washington Street, and other general questions. Public Speaker: Mr. Chris Bergh, Project Engineer with MDS Consulting, Palm Desert, CA - introduced himself and stated that the proposed street improvement plans do include a deceleration lane on Washington Street. He noted that the stacking distance from Washington Street to the main entry gate of the project is approximately 200 feet which would provide stacking of eight -to -nine cars. Public Speaker: Ms. Faye Pokletar, Landscape Architect with C2 Collaborative, San Clemente, CA - introduced herself and answered the Commission's questions PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 JUNE 10, 2014 in regards to the proposed landscaping palette and number of trees along Washington Street. Public Speaker: Mr. Tom Ward, La Quinta Resident and Construction Coordinator for St. Francis of Assisi, CA - introduced himself, advised the Commission that the church was very supportive of the proposed development and was involved in negotiations with the applicant. He expressed concerns regarding egress and ingress for church patrons exiting the property southbound and noted that he has been in communications with West Coast Housing, as well as with staff from both the Public Works and the Community Development Departments who are all actively working on getting these concerned addressed and resolved before the project is presented to City Council for review and consideration. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:50 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2014-01 1 recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 2006-081, Amendment 1, as submitted with staff's recommendations and amending Condition of Approval No. 3-A to read: " 3-A. The retaining system along the west border of the property shall be redesigned and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Department. Said retaining system shall incorporate a tiered design where any portion of the vertical face of the wall that is greater than eight (8) feet in height is stepped back a minimum of six (6) feet. The resulting step -back area(s) shall not exceed a maximum slope of 3: 1 and shall be landscaped with a variety of cascading vines and large shrubs in order to soften the overall mass of the walls. " Motion carried unanimously. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2014-012 recommending to the City Council approval of Site Development Permit 2013-937, as submitted with staff's recommendations and amending Condition of Approval No. 55 to read: " 55. The retaining system along the west border of the property shall be redesigned and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Department. Said retaining system shall incorporate a tiered design where any portion of the vertical face of the wall that is greater than eight (8) feet in height is stepped back a minimum of six (6) feet. The resulting step -back area(s) shall not exceed a maximum slope of 3: 1 and shall be landscaped with a variety of cascading vines and large shrubs PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 JUNE 10, 2014 in order to soften the overall mass of the walls. " Motion carried unanimously. 2. Environmental Assessment 2014-636 and Amended Final Map 32742 submitted by Monterra Properties, LLC proposing to reconfigure the recorded map in order to relocate the primary access for a 14-acre tract consisting of 40 single-family residential lots from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park. Project: Monterra (TR 32742). CEQA: the Community Development Department has prepared an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004-515 certified by the City Council on October 5, 2004 for Tentative Tract Map 32742. Location: east side of Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard. Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Staff stated that the applicant submitted a revised map after the staff report for this public hearing was prepared and distributed. The Memorandum dated June 10, 2014 prepared by Community Development Director Johnson and distributed to the Commissioners before the Planning Commission meeting identified the most current revisions to the Amended Final Map 32742. Due to the inadequate amount of time for staff review, staff recommends that this item be continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of June 24, 2014. Staff suggested that the public hearing be opened to give an opportunity to public to comment on the item. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 8:00 p.m. Public Speaker: Ms. Emily Hempmill, Council for Monterra Properties, LLC, Palm Desert, CA - introduced herself, gave a brief overview of the project, noted that the applicant has been in negotiations with the adjacent PGA West development to allow residents from Monterra to purchase golf memberships from PGA West. She stated the applicant has also discussed with the PGA West Master Association and the Fairways Homeowners Association moving the access from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park Road to make the new residents feel part of the existing community. She noted that after the proposed map was distributed, residents' comments expressed a concern regarding the omission of any access along Monroe Street, and thus, the applicant revised map to address these concerns by still relocating the main entry access to Brown Deer Park Road, but leaving an exit -only access along Monroe Street which will also serve as the construction gate during the build -out of the project. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 JUNE 10, 2014 Public Speaker: Jonathan Shapiro, PGA West Resident, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, said the developer and the associations had been in communications with the existing residents and he was supportive of the project if it included the exit access point on Monroe Street as it would alleviate some of the traffic that would no longer have to go through Turnberry Street. Public Speaker: Mr. Jerry McDonald, Representative of the Board of Directors and Manager of the Fairways Association, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself, said the applicant had been in constant communication with the Association during the process of revising the map. He said both the Association and the residents were supportive of the project with the exit -only access along Monroe Street. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to continue Environmental Assessment 2014-636 and Amended Final Map 32742 to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of June 24, 2014. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site Development Permit 2014-940 submitted by GHA Companies for the consideration of architectural and landscaping plans for Tract 31087, a 5.0-acre tract consisting of 19 single-family residential lots approved in 2004. Project: Darby Estates. CEQA: previously reviewed under Environmental Assessment 2003-480 prepared for Tentative Tract Map 31087, and approved on August 17, 2004; no changed circumstances or conditions are proposed which would trigger the preparation of subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166. Location: Darby Road; east of Palm Royale Drive. Associate Planner Jay Wuu presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARNG OPEN at 8:21 p.m. Public Speaker: Mr. Mario Gonzales, Project Manager with GHA Companies, Cathedral City, CA - introduced himself, gave an overview of the project, and answered the Commission's questions. Chairperson Barrows declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 8:28 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Wilkinson to adopt Resolution 2014-013 approving Site Development Permit 2014-940 as submitted with staff's recommendations and amending Condition of Approval No. 53 to read as follow: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5 JUNE 10, 2014 "A pedestrian pathway or wider driveway shall provides direct access from the street to the These pathways or wider driveways shall be Community Development Department as part process. - Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION be offered to homeowners that front door areas of the homes. reviewed and approved by the of the Final Landscaping Plan 1 . Consideration of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Board's request of the Planning Commission to direct staff to amend the La Quinta Municipal Code to require additional pedestrian access be provided from the street to the entrance of individual residential units. Planning Manager Sawyer presented the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Community Development Department. Public Speaker: Ms. Tina Burtel, La Quinta Cove Resident - introduced herself and spoke against having a direct pedestrian pathway from the street to the entrance of the residence as a mandatory requirement. General discussion followed regarding the pros and cons if such a requirement was made mandatory through the La Quinta Municipal Code including aesthetics, drainage impacts, additional hardscape, etc. Staff will research the issue and will report back its findings and recommendations to the Commission in August of 2014. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL - None COMMISSIONER ITEMS 1 . Discussion of the Commission's Summer Schedule. The Commission will be go dark the first meeting in August, 2014. 2. Report on City Council meetings of May 20 and June 3, 2014. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS - None PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6 JUNE 10, 2014 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to adjourn this meeting at 9:1 1 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7 JUNE 10, 2014 PH 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: JUNE 24, 2014 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-636 AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 APPLICANT: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC REQUEST: RECONFIGURE RECORDED MAP IN ORDER TO RELOCATE ACCESS FROM MONROE STREET TO BROWN DEER PARK LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 54 AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2014 - approving Environmental Assessment 2014-636, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2014 - approving Amended Final Map 32742, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes an Amended Final Map for Monterra (TR 32742) in order to relocate the primary access from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park while maintaining an exit -only access on Monroe Street (Attachment 1). Staff supports the proposal and has no significant issues with the proposed subdivision. BACKGROUND This proposal was considered at the June 10, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. However, the item was continued to the June 24, 2014 meeting due to the applicant submitting a revised map to staff on June 5, 2014, which didn't provide sufficient time to review the new information. The revised map, which includes an exit -only access on Monroe Street, is addressed later in this staff report. Tentative Tract Map 32742 was approved in 2004. The City Council approved the Final Map in 2007. A Site Development Permit for homes and landscaping was approved in 2013. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 11) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 1 Of 3 The 14-acre tract, located along Monroe Street between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard, consists of 40 single-family residential lots varying in size from approximately 10,000 to 15,000 square feet (Attachment 2 and Attachment 3). A retention basin lot is located at the southeast corner of the site. Access to the tract is on Monroe Street. An existing residential community, the Norman Course at PGA West, is located to the south of the tract, a private equestrian residence to the west, and vacant, un-entitled land is located to the north. PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS: The Amended Final Map proposes relocating the approved primary access from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park, and maintain an exit -only access on Monroe Street (Attachment 4). Number of lots and overall configuration of the tract will remain the same; only the vehicular access and the retention basin would be affected. The Brown Deer Park access will not be gated, and Monterra will be annexed into the PGA West community. An access easement/agreement has been established between the PGA West Master Homeowners Association and Monterra, and will be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits for the community. Both homeowners associations that govern the adjacent portion of the PGA West community, the PGA West Master Homeowners Association and Fairway's Homeowners Association, have expressed support of the proposed reconfiguration (Attachment 5). The Monroe Street exit -only access will be gated and will require a transponder to use. Only a right -out turning movement will be permitted, and no parking will be allowed along the exit -only access. The Amended Final Map, as conditioned, conforms to the design guidelines and standards of the City of La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code. The proposed site design incorporates street and parcel designs that are in compliance with applicable General Plan goals, policies, and development standards, and will provide adequate circulation, infrastructure, and utilities. Traffic and noise analyses have been completed as part of the proposed map, and have concluded that there will be minimal impacts upon the existing environment. Furthermore, the map will comply with all applicable conditions of approval for the approved site development permit. A Modification by Applicant will be required in order to revise the landscaping plan to match the reconfigured community layout. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 11) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 2 of 3 AGENCY & PUBLIC REVIEW: Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on May 1, 2014. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Community Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 30, 2014, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received from adjacent property owners. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Community Development Department has prepared an Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004- 515 that the City Council certified on October 5, 2004 for Tentative Tract Map 32742. The Addendum compared the impacts of the proposed project with the impacts analyzed in the original environmental review, with a focus on Air Quality, Noise, and Transportation/Traffic impacts. The analysis concludes that the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on the existing environment. Report prepared by: Jay Wuu, Associate Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson, Community Development Director Attachment: 1 . Project Information 2. Project Area Map 3. Tract 32742 (Recorded Final Map) 4. Amended Final Map 32742 5. Homeowners Association Correspondence P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 11) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 3 of 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2004-515, FOR AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-636 APPLICANT: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 24t" day of June, 2014, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing as continued from the regularly -scheduled Public Hearing on June 10, 2014, to consider a request by Monterra Properties, LLC for approval of Environmental Assessment 2014-636, prepared for Amended Final Map 32742, located along Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard, more particularly described as: APN: 767-860-001 to 767-860-042 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 30, 2014, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004-515 has been prepared and determined that the revised project does not trigger the need for the preparation of an additional Environmental Assessment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the revised project does not involve: 1. Substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Environmental Addendum which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts; 2. Substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Environmental Addendum; or 3. New information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Environmental Planning Commission Resolution 2014 - Environmental Assessment 2014-636 Monterra (Monterra Properties, LLC) Adopted: June 24, 2014 Page 2 Addendum to substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following findings to justify their recommendation for certification of said Addendum: 1. The revised project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, as the addendum prepared for the revised project did not identify any significant impacts beyond the existing project approval. 2. The revised project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals, as the addendum prepared for this revised project did not identify any significant impacts with regard to this issue. 3. The revised project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as those impacts identified for geologic, water, air quality, biology, hydrology, noise, utility systems and cultural resources were addressed as part of prior environmental review, with no significant new impacts being identified with the revised project. 4. The revised project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly, as the addendum prepared for this revised project did not identify any significant impact with regard to the public health, safety, or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1 . That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case; SECTION 2. That is does hereby approve the Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004-515 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and as stated in the original Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum (Exhibit "A") attached hereto, and on file in the Community Development Department. Planning Commission Resolution 2014 - Environmental Assessment 2014-636 Monterra (Monterra Properties, LLC) Adopted: June 24, 2014 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 241h day of June, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: KATIE BARROWS, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: LES JOHNSON, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 EXHIBIT "A" ADDENDUM to INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for Amended Tract Map 32742 June, 2044 Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 The City of La Quinta, as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") has prepared this Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) which was approved by the City of La Quinta City Council on October 5, 2004 for Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and Tentative Tract Map 32742. Since that time, extensions of time by the City and the State have been granted, and the Map has been recorded. The purpose of this Addendum is to document certain changes to the project which will be implemented through the following land use approvals: AMENDED TRACT MAP NO. 32742 These changes are collectively referred to as the "Revised Project." The Tract Map (TM) is located on the west side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55. The project site consists of approximately 15 acres of vacant, previously graded land. It is bordered on the north by equestrian facilities, on the west by residential development, on the east by Monroe Street and vacant lands beyond, and on the south by residential development and golf course which are part of the PGA West project. The previous project proposed the construction of 40 single family homes on lots ranging from 9,200 to 15,000 square feet in size. Access to the project was planned for Monroe Street. The Revised Project consists of 40 single family lots of the same size. The only change proposed for the Revised Project is to modify the access to the site from Monroe Street to a private road connecting the project to Brown Deer Park, within the adjacent PGA West project. The purpose of the change is to provide the residents of the Revised Project with the amenities available at PGA West. Because the Tract Map was recorded with access to Monroe Street, an Amended Tract Map application has been filed to change the access point. All other configurations, layouts and land use allocations remain the same as originally approved. 2 N 89°55'00" E 45.03' 1 2 w m CURVE TABLE ,URVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C20 141.13' 38.50' 210°01 '07' C39 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 14" C59 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C2 141.13' 38.50' 210°01 '07' C21 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'44" C40 39.10' 38.50' 58° 11 ' 11 " C60 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C3 15.27' 38.50' 22°43'03" C22 35.00' 38.50' 52*05'14" C41 35.00' 38.50' 52°05'13" C61 16.47' 109.50' 8°37'13" C4 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 13" C23 39.10' 38.50' 58' 11 ' 11 " C42 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'45" C62 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C5 35.26' 38.50' 52°2829" C24 35.00' 38.50' 52°05'13" C43 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'34" C63 141.13' 38.50' 210°01'07' C6 35.00' 38.50' 52*05'14" C25 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'45" C44 12.21 ' 109.50' 6°23'20" C64 16.01 ' 38.50, 23°49'44" , 20.60 , 38.50 ,,, 30°39 08 C26 , 28.69 , 109.50 ,,, 15°00 34 C45 , 16.47 , 109.50 ,» 8°37 14 C65 , 35.00 , 38.50 ,» 52°05 14 C8 48.25' 109.50' 25° 14'47" C27 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C46 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '28" C66 39.10' 38.50' 58° 11 ' 11 " C9 8.77' 109.50' 4°3523" C28 16.48' 109.50' 8°37'14" C47 12.13' 24.50' 28°21 '28" C67 35.00' 38.50' 52°05'13" C10 39.48' 109.50' 20°3924" C29 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C48 12.13' 24.50' 28°21'27" C68 16.01' 38.50' 23°49'45" C11 116.65' 60.50' 110*2826' C30 32.07' 24.50' 74°59'55" C49 12.62' 25.50' 28°21'27" C69 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'34" C 12 6.3 1' 60.50' 5°58' 17" C31 90.00' 60.50' 85' 14'08" C50 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '27" C70 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C 13 52.47' 60.50' 49°41 ' 17" C32 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C51 12.13' 24.50' 28°21 '27" C71 16.48' 109.50' 8°37' 14" C14 35.50' 60.50' 33°37'12" C33 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C52 12.13' 24.50' 28°21'28" C72 54.19' 34.50' 90'00'00" C 15 22.38' 60.50' 21 ' 11 '40" C34 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C53 12.62' 25.50' 2821 '28" C73 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C 16 19.56' 109.50' 10' 14' 13" C35 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C54 5.80' 25.50' 13'0 1'43" C74 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C 17 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C36 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C55 6.82' 25.50' 15° 19'44" C75 79.69' 60.50' 75°28' 15" C 18 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C37 141.13' 38.50' 10'01 '07" C56 0.41 ' 25.50' 0°5524" C76 10.31 ' 60.50' 09°4553" C 19 1 12.21 ' 1 109.50' 1 6°23'20" C38 1 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'44" C57 12.2 1' 25.50' 27°26'04" C77 16.17' 24.50' 37°4849" C58 1 38.48' 24.50' 1 90°00'00" I C78 1 2.29' 1 24.50' 05°21'17" N 89°55'00" E 1218.03' SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 32 742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF TRACT NO. 32742, RECORDED IN BOOK 427, PAGES 61 THROUGH 64, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, AND SITUATED IN THE NORTH 112 OF NORTHEAST 114 OF SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.B.M. HEITEC JANUARY 2014 ��0 O N S U L T I N G 0 30 60 120 240 3 GRAPHIC SCALE. 1 "= 60' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N57°50'26 "E 18.11 ' L6 N58°4236 "E 17.14' L2 N61'08'54"W 17.37' L7 N58°5236"W 17.14' L3 N58°5236 "W 17.14' L8 N58'4236 "E 17.14' L4 N58°4236 "E 17.14 L9 N80° 13' 16 "W 46.34' L5 N58°5236 "W 17.14' r 386 6' 100.00 100.00 102.00 103.00 102.00 102.00 103.00 102.00 102.00 103.00 110.71 5.01 0.02 _ � : o �� 16 �I o, �' �1 c' Q) �� �I Q) o o �� ��. �- o0 00 �- .� o0 0o w o0 o w � � o o� 1 I o icy o 1 30 1 u� o 0 0 0 l 37 I o N 15 0 o N �� o 00 ��� �1 0 00 o f �1 0 00 0 0 �� �� 0 0 111,190 SF o ^ 17 22 0 11,572 SF n 0 24 N 29 0 "� o .- 31 N 36 0 38 w o �I o o^ 01 0l o o^Q)111,572SFo� o z`- o�11,572SFo1 0 23, 079 SF z "' 1 o z z o z z 1 o z o z L N 1 n 14, 749 SF `,_' 14, 972 SF N N 1 14, 972 SF `,=' 14, 972 SF N 1 14, 972 SF `;' 14, 972 SF 1 N 16,513 SF co co) �� N� co ,�BS� 6Q61 C 7 9 �9 61.15 52 852�68�� C 6 6 �� $ �2�6 S�S236�`3`3 040 �a ���6 o S�S2�6 ��, C 2 3 �� �� �2�6 uj q, C76 c' 1 C63 �' '� C37 �' C20 N89°55'00 "E 102.92' v , » , , „ , 6' „ , o� , „ , , „ , , �,•, �, cp N89°55 00 E 100.00 N89°55 00 E 100.80 C� (� W N89°55 00 E 100.80 N89°55 00 E 100.80 v - W W N89°55 00 E 100.80 N89°55 00 E 100.80 v N89°55 00 E 114.30 o Z v L� » , » Lw R I� I E � , » S R IY v L6 „ „ W v �"� S81 °05'49 "W(R) o S74°26 26 E(R) Q N S82° 12 30 W(R) S81 ° 15 49 E(R) I� cn Q S81 °05 49 W(R) S81 ° 15 49 E(R) F� cn ¢ S81 °05 49 W(R) S81 ° 15 49 E(R) rz c Q _ _ _ _ _ 00 _ o U zN� ^� o - - - - zO0 QN�v `' N ZO� QN� `' cn `' 0Nl- 10' P.U.E. 18 0 10' P. U. E. v, (� o 25 0 0 10' P. U. E• v; O �"'� . 32 0 0 10 P. U. E. c,; ¢ �,� , 39 0 Lri14 v, a Z h o o� 21 o U'- a o o� 28 0 �- U �,a h o o 35 0 �; a •`n o 11, 554 SF o o I 10, 249 SF d c� 10, 272 SF o W 40 10, 282 SF z 10, 282 SF Z h 10, 282 SF z 10, 282 SF W ``� o C83 N Q= z 10, 282 SF W_ Z _ J cc = o o I o N89°55 00 E 129.80 rloNo 00 �, `�- °-55-, 00 »E 131.76 N89°55 , 0-0 -»E -13-1.76, o cN8-9°5-5 ,- 00 -»E 131.76, N89°5�.- •- G�o �°55 00 »E 148.12,5,00E 131.76 °.°,„ ., N89v cr"'81°47 06S79°29'49"W(R� n S81'2747"E(R� S827Rf 1746WR �� J � R� o z`- `�S8E R� '"o�W o r <wt z p ~ Lo Ln 3 U W o 0p °o 13 0 o Ica c5 (Z) �o Z L Q o �� 0 19 20 � Cc�, 26 0 27 Ln 2n Ln 33 6 34 o o N z o <, o o z o o ter- z Lo 0 0 <r °p 10, 771 SF o, N o o �ci o Ln 0 12 720 SF 12, 720 SF o `n o `n 12 499 SF o Ln Q z c 0 12, 488 SF "' z o 0 0 0 20.50 z 12, 373 SF rn 12, 499 SF o 41 0 0 0 41 0 12, 499 SF rn o moo' z z 0.50 0.50 z `- z 0.50 0.50 z z ^; N89°55'00 "E C86 = 10' P.U.E. N28° 16 27 E R N28°26 28 W R R �) 10 P.U.E. � C5� ' 8 - - - - - � C�� C76 N89°55'00"E 142.37' P 25' 30' 119.02 r 98.50' 108.50' 45.00 45.00 59.75 C: C46 59.75 45.00 45.00 108.50 108.50 I- S89°26'41 "W R O R O 1� Lq N 89°55'00" E 356.75' 25.0 25.00 A A N 89°55'00" E 411.75'-(� _ S85°49'04 "E(R) J o _ , C48 N89°55 DQ E C47 _ LOT A ' 30 7. 00^ 307.00 5Q� ^ 0.82 ACRE 307.00 ^ Cj o J R n 12 0 , d- o d ' o �' N 89°55 00 E 921.00 " PRIVATE STREET Ln 0. C� �h o , „ , C52 N89°55 00 E C51 FOUR SEASONS PLACE „ 0 32' WIDE EASEMENT TO 10,539 SF `S N 89°55 00 E 311.15 C53 C50 N 89°55 00 E 299.75 J N79'40 47 E , 7 50.00 L9 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER N44°29 39 E R � \ C 9 0 0.00 80.00 80.00 68. C5 74.25 80.00 80.00 65.50 � 52.00 (� '�88 C89 41. 4 \\ C54 >> W p DISTRICT FOR WATER AND N N89°55'00E �� 2•90 10' P.U.E. c"', �1 �.� 10' P.U.E. o v G� 1 SEWER PURPOSES DEDICATED o I i� W 1 I n Q PER THIS MAP 115.00 �o �' 1 � . 15°05 05 w R LOT F N �`� 0 0 0 0 01 N N1 �1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, k 3 A 9 cfl o o o 0 o o1 co1 ^ �I 4 0 3 Ln 0 2 Ln 0 1 00 o 0 Ln 11 o Ni10 0� 9 0� 8 0� 7 0� 6 ^1 'oNo1 5 �1� :n o� �; oo STORM WATER ' 0 0 �n o o o o �, N N N 1 0^ o^ o^ rn Ln Ln d 55 15,094 SF o o 9,331 SF z 9 200 SF z z z z o `�' "' o z 9,201 SF o 9,200 SF o 9,200 SF o 10,197 SF o o o -i DETENTION LOT cc o z 9,200 SF 9,200 SF 9,211 SF o g 629 SF o z z z z z z 0.72 ACRE i J I , , , , , 0 0 16 .00 z 0 0 0 z 0 z 0 0 0 0 27.5 27.50 C78 211.10 .01 25.01 30.02 - S89'55-00--- 11'---------------- - - BROWN DEER PARK N% 3 4,7 N 0. 29 -------T----�----�----r----�----�----r----�----�----T----�------T------- , ITRACT � �rn,64 I ,,. vv SHEET 2 FOR EASEMENT, MONUMENT AND SURVEYOR'S NOTES M • B ' ZyG/ 01121114 051107-amended F03 Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 The City has compared the impacts of the Revised Project with the impacts analyzed in the IS- MND, and has made the following findings: Aesthetics — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will result in the construction of the same number of residential units, in the same locations, and with the same mass and scale as the approved project. There are no significant topographic or scenic features on or near the site. The development of single family homes will not impact the viewsheds of existing homes to the north, south and west of the Revised Project site. The project will generate as much lighting as was previously analyzed. Overall impacts associated with aesthetics will remain less than significant. Agricultural Resources — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The project site remains vacant, and is not in agriculture. Agricultural activities to the east of the project area, beyond Monroe Street, will continue unimpeded by the proposed project. No impacts to agricultural resources are expected. Air Quality Impacts — Impacts will be no greater, if not less significant, than those previously analyzed. The proposed project will generate the same level of emissions as those previously analyzed. These were found to be less than significant, with the implementation of standard best management practices relating to PM10 emissions during grading activities. The Revised Project will be subject to these mitigation measures. As regards vehicle emissions, impacts may be less than previously analyzed, because of the improvements in technology associated with vehicle exhaust, and the increase in alternative fuel vehicles occurring in the City and the region. The proposed project will result in Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions during the construction and long term operation phases of the project. The City has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan that includes implementation measures designed to reduce the GHG emissions of new development. The proposed project will also be subject to the requirements of Title 24 of the Building Code, which imposes stringent requirements for energy efficiency. GHG emissions generated by the proposed project will not be substantial and will not directly or indirectly result in a significant impact to the environment or conflict with applicable GHG plans, policies, or regulations. Therefore, impacts to air quality and climate change from the generation of GHG emissions associated with the construction and operation of the proposed project will be less than significant. Biological Resources — Impacts will be no greater than those previously analyzed. The site remains very and significantly disturbed. No significant native vegetation occurs on the site. The Revised Project will be subject to the requirements of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and as a result will pay mitigation fees. These fees are designed to mitigate the impacts to sensitive species throughout the Valley. 4 Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 Cultural Resources — Impacts will be no greater than those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will be required to monitor all ground disturbing activities in order to assure that any unknown potential buried resources are not impacted by the project, as was the original project. These mitigation measures will assure that impacts to cultural resources from the Revised Project remain less than significant. Geology and Soils — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will result in the development of the same number and type of single family homes as previously analyzed. These homes will be subject to the provisions of the Building Code in place at the time that building permits are issued. The standards and requirements include in the Code are designed to minimize the impacts associated with seismic hazards in the region. The Revised Project will also be required to implement the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration pertaining to liquefaction hazards. This requirement will assure that impacts associated with foundation design remain less than significant. Hazards and Hazardous Materials — The Revised Project, like the original project, will have no impact relating to hazards and hazardous materials. The resulting homes on the site will not generate, store or transport significant amounts of hazardous materials. Only household cleaners are expected to occur on the site, as is typical of all residential development. The City continues to implement, through its solid waste contractor, household hazardous waste disposal programs. No change in the level of impact is expected as a result of the Revised Project. Hydrology and Water Quality — Impacts will be no greater than those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will be required to retain 100 year storm flows on site, and has provided for this through a retention basin located in the same location as that of the original project. The overall requirements to manage onsite stormwater and to protect groundwater quality will still be implemented through the City's standard requirements for Water Quality Management Planning and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Planning. Land Use Planning — Impacts equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project is consistent with the Land Use and Zoning designations for the site, and will develop in a manner substantially consistent with that previously planned for the property. Mineral Resources — Not applicable. Like the previously approved project, the Revised Project will have no impact on mineral resources Noise — Impacts will be no greater than those previously analyzed, although they will differ slightly. The Revised Project's primary noise impact will be, like the original project, vehicular traffic. Unlike the original project, however, vehicle trips will not exit the site onto Monroe 5 Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 Street, but instead will exit through the PGA West project to the south. The private roadway will access Brown Deer Park, and vehicles will travel through PGA West to existing gated access points either on Monroe, south of the site, or on Madison Street, west of the site. In order to determine whether the impacts associated with the Revised Project would have a significant impact on the residential development within PGA West, a noise analysis was completed (please see Appendix A). The analysis determined that current noise levels on Brown Deer Park and Tumberry Brown were 49.2 and 47.6 dBA CNEL, respectively. This is a low noise environment typical of residential development. The analysis further determined that with the addition of traffic from the Revised Project, noise levels on Brown Deer Park would increase by 1.4 dBA CNEL (to 50.6), and noise levels on Turnberry Brown would increase by 2.7 dBA CNEL (to 50.3). These noise levels remain well below the City's standard for outdoor noise levels for sensitive receptors, which stands at 65 dBA CNEL. Furthermore, noise level increases of less than 3 dBA generally cannot be discerned by the human ear, and it is therefore expected that the Revised Project's vehicle trip noise will not be perceptible to existing residents within PGA West. In conclusion, impacts associated with the Revised Project remain less than significant. Population and Housing — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will generate the same number of units, and therefore the same number of people as the original project. The Revised Project will have no impact on population and housing. Public Services — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will generate the same levels of demand for police and fire services as the original project. Similarly, impacts to schools and parks will be equivalent to those previously studied. The impact to public services will remain less than significant. Recreation — It is likely that the Revised Project's impacts will be less than the original project. The provision of access through PGA West will allow the residents to utilize the recreational amenities available with that project, and will reduce the need of residents to use public recreational services. As with the original project, it is expected that the Revised Project will have no impact on recreational facilities. Transportation/Traffic — Impacts associated with the Revised Project will be equivalent to, but will differ slightly from the original project. The original project proposed a single access point onto Monroe Street. The Revised Project will have no access on Monroe, and instead will access the public roadway system through PGA West's internal street system. Trip distribution will vary somewhat, insofar as the Revised Project residents will have the ability to access Madison Street C Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 from inside PGA West, where original project residents would have accessed Madison Street from Monroe and Avenue 54. To determine whether the Revised Project would have significant impacts on traffic and circulation, a traffic analysis was prepared (please see Appendix B). The traffic analysis concurred with the original estimate of total daily trips to be generated by the project site at build out. The traffic analysis then distributed these trips on Brown Deer Park, through the existing development, and to either Monroe Street (south of the project site), or Madison Street (west of the project site). The traffic analysis found that the Revised Project will result in approximately 40% of trips exiting the site and heading west on Brown Deer Park, while about 60% of project trips would head east and south onto Turnberry Brown and exit onto Monroe. The analysis further found that the Revised project would add 76 daily trips to Brown Deer Park west of the site, and 115 daily trips to Turnberry Brown, south of the site. With the addition of these trips, streets within PGA West will continue to operate at Level of Service A. As a result of this analysis, impacts associated with the development of the Revised Project will remain less than significant. Utilities and Service Systems — Impacts will be equivalent to those previously analyzed. The Revised Project will generate an equivalent demand on domestic water and sewage treatment services, will be required to comply with all City standards relating to storm water management, and will generate the same amount of solid waste as that previously analyzed. Impacts associated with utilities will continue to be less than significant. Findings The City finds that consideration of the Revised Project does not warrant the preparation of a subsequent environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162 or Public Resources Code Section 21166, in that the Revised Project does not involve: 1. Substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration which would involve new significant effects on the environment or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts; 2. Substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts; or 3. New information of substantial importance which would involve new significant effects on the environment not analyzed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. 7 Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 Appendix A Noise Impact Analysis 1► �r� �►rr-�► u��'�`i�► _ Inc_ 4410 tree feourt Lane, Fallbrook G/h f2028 phone 7&0 - 473-1253 www.Idneonsulting.net fax 7100-W-404; April 30, 2014 Mr. Mark Ladeda Monterra Properties, LLC 55075 Monroe Street La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Noise Findings Letter — Monterra Properties Tract 32742, City of La Quinta Ldn Consulting (Ldn) has analyzed the noise levels from the proposed project along the nearby/adjacent roadways at the request of the City of La Quinta. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the anticipated noise levels from the Project's proposed traffic on nearby/adjacent roadways and compare them with the City's thresholds. Project Description The proposed project consists of 40 single family dwelling units. The proposed residential community would have access to Brown Deer Park, a private street within the PGA West Greg Norman golf course gated community. The proposed project site is currently vacant. City of La Quinta Noise Standards The City of La Quinta has adopted interior and exterior noise standards as part of the General Plan Noise Element for assessing the compatibility of land uses with transportation related noise impacts. For noise sensitive residential land uses, the City has adopted an exterior noise level goal of 65 dBA CNEL for the outdoor living areas. Project Related Transportation Noise The off -site Project related roadway segment noise levels projected in this report were calculated using the methods in the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA-RD-77-108, December, 1978). The FHWA Model uses the traffic volume, vehicle mix, speed, and roadway geometry to compute the equivalent noise level. A spreadsheet calculation was used which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time periods used in the calculation of CNEL. Weighting these equivalent 4/30/2014 1 1445-01 Monterra Tract 32742 Noise Letter Mr. Mark Ladeda Monterra Properties, LLC 55075 Monroe Street La Quinta, CA 92253 r for��rx�, rx. 4410 Greskourf Lane, FallbrooK GA f2026 phone Vo-477-1253 Fax 7&o-&Of-4f43 noise levels and summing them gives the CNEL for the traffic projections. The noise contours are then established by iterating the equivalent noise level over many distances until the distance to the desired noise contour(s) are found. The future traffic noise model utilizes a typical vehicle mix of 96% Autos, 2% Medium Trucks and 2% Heavy Trucks for all analyzed roadway segments. The vehicle mix provides the hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA Model. To determine if noise level increases associated with the development of the Project will create noise impacts. The noise levels for the existing conditions were compared with the noise level increase from the Project. Utilizing the Project's trip generation analysis (Source: Monterra Properties Tract 32742 Project Trip Generation Analysis prepared by TJW Engineering, Inc., March 31, 2014) noise contours were developed for the following traffic scenarios: Existin : Current traffic noise conditions without construction of the project. Existing Plus Project: Current traffic noise conditions plus traffic from the completion of the project. The noise levels and reference distances to the 65 dBA CNEL contours for the roadways in the vicinity of the Project site are given in Table 1 for the Existing Scenario and in Table 2 for the Existing Plus Project Scenario. Note that the values given do not take into account the effect of any noise barriers or topography that may reduce the noise levels. Table 1: Existing Noise Levels 4/30/2014 2 1445-01 Monterra Tract 32742 Noise Letter Mr. Mark Ladeda Monterra Properties, LLC 55075 Monroe Street La Quinta, CA 92253 Conclusions 4410 Greskourf Lane, FallbrooK GA f2026 phone Vo-473-1253 Fax 7&o-&Of-4f43 Table 2: Existing Plus Project Noise Levels The overall roadway segment noise levels will increase to approximately 51 dBA CNEL with the development of the Project. The Project does not create substantial noise increase and the overall noise levels are well below the City's 65 dBA CNEL threshold. Therefore, the Project's contributions to roadway noise will not cause any significant impacts to any existing or future noise sensitive land uses. If you should have any questions regarding these findings, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 473-1253 at your convenience. Sincerely, Ldn Consulting, Inc. Jeremy Louden, Principal 4/30/2014 3 1445-01 Monterra Tract 32742 Noise Letter Terra Nova/City of La Quinta Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Amended Tract Map 32742 Appendix B Traffic Impact Analysis March 31, 2014 Mr. Mark Ladeda Monterra Properties, LLC 55075 Monroe Street La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: Monterra Properties Tract 32742 Project Trip Generation Analysis, City of La Quinta Dear Mr. Ladeda, TJW ENGINEERING, INC. (TJW) is pleased to submit this trip generation analysis for the proposed Monterra Properties Tract 32742 single-family residential project located in the City of La Quinta. The proposed project consists of 40 single family dwelling units. The proposed residential community would have access to Brown Deer Park, a private street within the PGA West Greg Norman golf course gated community. The proposed project site is currently vacant. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix A. Methodology In order to determine the project's anticipated trip generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 9th Edition trip generation rates were utilized. The analysis calculates the AM peak hour trips, PM peak hour trips and average daily trips (ADT) forecast to be generated by the proposed project land use. Table 1 shows the ITE rates used to calculate forecast gross trip generation of the proposed project. The traffic generation of the proposed project, based on these rates is also shown in Table 1. Table 1 Proposed Project Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use (ITE Code) Unit Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation Rates (ITE 9th Edition) Single Family DU 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 9.52 Residential (110) Project Vehicle Trips Single Family Homes 40 8 22 30 25 15 40 381 Note: DU = Dwelling Units Source: ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012) As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is forecast to generate 30 AM peak hour trips, 40 PM peak hour trips and 381 daily trips. 540 N. Golden Circle Dr., Suite 104 1 Santa Ana, California 92705 1 t: (949) 878-3509 f: (949) 878-3593 www.tjwengineering.com Mr. Mark Ladeda Monterra Properties Tract 32742 March 31, 2014 Trip Generation Analysis The project site is within the PGA West Greg Norman golf course gated community. Project trips will generally utilize the community's gates on Kingston Heath and Tumberry Brown . Exhibit A shows the forecast trip distribution of proposed project trips, and Exhibit a shows the forecast trip assignment of project generated trips. The City of La Quinta's traffic study requirements require traffic studies be prepared when a proposed project is anticipated to generate 50 or more peak hour trips in either the AM or the PM peak hour. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is forecast to generate 31 AM peak hour trips and 40 PM peak hour trips, below the threshold for preparation of a traffic impact analysis. Therefore no further traffic analysis is required per City of La Quinta guidelines. However, City of La Quinta staff requested that average daily traffic (ADT) counts be collected on select streets within the existing development to understand the changes to the level of traffic on the local streets within the development as a result of the proposed project. Table 2 shows the existing ADT on Brown Deer Park west of the project site, and on Tumberry Brown southeast of the project site. Detailed ADT counts are provided in Appendix B. Table 2 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Existing Plus Project Roadway Segment Existing ADT Project ADT ADT Brown Deer Park 199 76 275 Tumberry Brown 138 115 253 As shown in Table 2, existing ADT on the local streets within the PGA West Greg Norman golf course gated community are very low since the entire existing community is approximately 187+ single family homes. The proposed project will approximately double ADT on the roadway segments counted, since the proposed 40 home community will primarily be served by the two local streets surveyed. However, even with the proposed project, volumes on the local streets will still be very low. Based on the 9,000 ADT capacity of a local street in the City of La Quinta traffic engineering guidelines, a local street carrying up to 5,400 vehicles per day would be considered operating at LOS A. The local streets within the development are expected to carry less than 300 vehicles per day with the proposed project. Please feel free to call us at (949) 878-3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. TJW Engineering, Inc. 2 1 Page MPL14001 Monterra Trip Gen Memo 3312014 Mr. Mark Ladeda March 31, 2014 Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE Principal TJW Engineering, Inc. Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 Monterra Properties Tract 32742 Trip Generation Analysis Jeffrey Weckstein Transportation Planner TJW Engineering, Inc. r�� TR�ja * ExP 6 0 TJW Engineering, Inc. 3 1 Page MPL14001 Monterra Trip Gen Memo 3312014 Legend: — — — Project Boundary U U) w z O O Of U) z 1-1 O Exhibit A: Proposed Project Trip Distribution MPL-14-001 Monterra Traffic Memo - March 2014 Q Not to Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P: (949) 878-3509 - F: (949) 878-3593 - www.tjwengineering.com Legend: XX/XX - AM/PM Peak Hour Volume XX - Average Daily Traffic Volume U z 0 0 0 Of U) z 0 0 Exhibit B: Proposed Project Trip Assignment MPL-14-001 Monterra Traffic Memo - March 2014 Q Not to Scale Traffic Engineering & Transportation Planning Consultants - 540 N. Golden Circle Dr #104 - Santa Ana, CA 92705 - P: (949) 878-3509 - F: (949) 878-3593 - www.tjwengineering.com Appendices APPENDIX A SITE PLAN 0 APPENDIX B EXISTING ADT VOLUMES Tuesday, March 25, 2014 CITY: La Quinta PROJECT: SC0335 Brown Deer Park west of Royal St George Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, AimTD LLC tel. 951 249 3226 AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 12:00 2 2 00:15 0 0 12:15 0 2 00:30 0 0 12:30 1 3 00:45 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 6 4 11 17 01:00 0 0 13:00 2 1 01:15 0 0 13:15 2 4 01:30 0 0 13:30 1 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 5 5 10 15 02:00 0 0 14:00 2 3 02:15 0 0 14:15 1 3 02:30 0 0 14:30 1 2 02:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 5 3 11 16 03:00 1 0 15:00 0 1 03:15 0 0 15:15 1 4 03:30 0 0 15:30 2 0 03:45 0 1 0 0 1 15:45 3 6 4 9 15 04:00 0 0 16:00 1 1 04:15 0 0 16:15 2 0 04:30 0 0 16:30 3 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 16:45 1 7 1 2 9 05:00 0 1 17:00 1 4 05:15 1 0 17:15 1 1 05:30 0 1 17:30 0 1 05:45 1 2 1 3 5 17:45 0 2 2 8 10 06:00 0 0 18:00 1 1 06:15 1 1 18:15 1 0 06:30 1 0 18:30 1 2 06:45 0 2 0 1 3 18:45 2 5 3 6 11 07:00 0 0 19:00 2 1 07:15 3 2 19:15 0 1 07:30 0 0 19:30 3 0 07:45 2 5 2 4 9 19:45 0 5 2 4 9 08:00 0 1 20:00 1 0 08:15 0 2 20:15 0 3 08:30 5 2 20:30 1 1 08:45 1 6 0 5 11 20:45 0 2 0 4 6 09:00 2 1 21:00 0 2 09:15 4 4 21:15 0 2 09:30 7 4 21:30 0 2 09:45 0 13 4 13 26 21:45 0 0 0 6 6 10:00 0 1 22:00 0 0 10:15 1 0 22:15 0 0 10:30 3 1 22:30 0 0 10:45 1 5 4 6 11 22:45 0 0 0 0 11:00 1 1 23:00 0 1 11:15 0 1 23:15 1 0 11:30 1 6 23:30 0 0 11:45 3 5 4 12 17 23:45 0 1 0 1 2 Total Vol. 39 44 83 44 72 116 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 83 116 199 AM PM Split % 47.0% 53.o% 41.7% 37.9% 62.1% 58.3% Peak Hour 08:45 11:30 09:00 15:45 13:45 12:30 Volume 14 14 26 9 13 20 P.H.F. 0.50 0.58 0.59 0.75 0.65 0.71 pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 951 249 3226 Tuesday, March 25, 2014 CITY: La Quinta PROJECT: SC0335 Tumberry Brown east of Brown Deer ParkPrepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, AinrTD LLC tel. 951 249 3226 AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 00:00 0 0 12:00 2 2 00:15 0 0 12:15 2 1 00:30 0 0 12:30 1 3 00:45 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 8 2 8 16 01:00 0 0 13:00 1 1 01:15 0 0 13:15 1 0 01:30 0 0 13:30 0 2 01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 6 0 3 9 02:00 0 0 14:00 1 0 02:15 0 0 14:15 4 1 02:30 0 0 14:30 0 3 02:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 6 1 5 11 03:00 0 1 15:00 0 1 03:15 0 0 15:15 0 0 03:30 0 0 15:30 1 1 03:45 0 0 0 1 1 15:45 3 4 0 2 6 04:00 0 0 16:00 1 2 04:15 0 0 16:15 0 0 04:30 0 0 16:30 1 1 04:45 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 2 2 5 7 05:00 0 0 17:00 2 1 05:15 0 0 17:15 0 0 05:30 0 0 17:30 0 0 05:45 0 0 1 1 1 17:45 2 4 0 1 5 06:00 0 0 18:00 1 0 06:15 2 1 18:15 0 0 06:30 2 1 18:30 1 1 06:45 0 4 0 2 6 18:45 3 5 1 2 7 07:00 0 0 19:00 1 3 07:15 1 1 19:15 0 0 07:30 0 0 19:30 0 1 07:45 3 4 0 1 5 19:45 0 1 0 4 5 08:00 0 0 20:00 0 0 08:15 2 2 20:15 3 0 08:30 2 1 20:30 1 2 08:45 1 5 1 4 9 20:45 0 4 0 2 6 09:00 1 1 21:00 2 0 09:15 4 2 21:15 0 1 09:30 4 3 21:30 1 0 09:45 0 9 0 6 15 21:45 0 3 0 1 4 10:00 0 0 22:00 1 0 10:15 0 0 22:15 0 0 10:30 2 0 22:30 0 0 10:45 5 7 1 1 8 22:45 0 1 0 0 1 11:00 1 1 23:00 0 0 11:15 1 0 23:15 1 1 11:30 1 2 23:30 0 0 11:45 6 9 2 5 14 23:45 0 1 0 1 2 Total Vol. 38 21 59 45 34 79 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 83 55 138 AM PM Split % 64.4% 35.6% 42.8% 57.0% 43.0% 57.2% Peak Hour 11:30 11:45 11:45 13:30 12:00 12:00 Volume 11 8 19 9 8 16 P.H.F. 0.46 0.67 0.59 0.56 0.67 0.80 pacific@aimtd.com Tell. 951 249 3226 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room #121 Sacramento CA 95814 X County Clerk Countv of Riverside Attention: Cindy Kohler 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside CA 92501-3801 From: (Public Agency) CITY OF LA QUINTA P. 0. Box 1504 La Quinta CA 92253 OCT 13 2004 GARY L. ORSU By / yl C. Kohler L Deputy Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and Tentative Tract Map 32741. State Clearinghouse Number {If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead A enGY Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension N/A Mr. Martin Magana 760.777.7068 Project Location (include County): West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, City of la Quinta, County of Riverside, California. Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide ± 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots for Village Builders 98. On October 5, 2004, the La Quinta City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and approved Tentative Tract Map 32741 to subdivide ± 15.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots by adopting Resolution 2004-068 (Environmental Assessment) and Resolution 2004-069 (Tentative Tract Map). This is to advise that the City of La Quinta has approved the above described project on October 5, 2004, as ( X Lead Agency), and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 . The project [_will X will not] have a significant effect on the environment. 2. _ An Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures I X were_ were not] made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [_ was X was not] adopted for this project. 5. Findings [ X were _ were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Environmental Documents, with any comments, responses and record of project approval, are available to the General Public at: City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Martin Magana / , October 11 2004 Name/Signature (Public Agenc Date Date received for filing at OPR: N/A Associate Planner Title COUNTY CLERK deg. C7e ,larailioniNtc osierminatlen Filed peOS'T . C. 21152 OCT 1 V� 0 204 Removed: Dept. By: County of R e ide. Slate of California CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title, location, name and address of project proponent (including county): Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 32741 Location: West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside. Project Proponent: Village Builders 98 121 Spear Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots. Findings of Exemption: This project was approved by the City Council on October 5, 2004 by adopting Resolution No. 2004-068 certifying the Environmental Assessment 2004-515 (See attached Resolution). Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings a fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record, the project will not individually, or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Martin Magah Associate Planner City of La Quinta, California October 11, 2004 N+[]TI�E OF DETERMINATION To: _ Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) CITY OF LA QUINTA 1400 Tenth Street, Room #121 !La:�Q�u�inlaa . 0504 Sacramento CA 95814 A 92253 X County Clerk OCT 13 2004 County of Riverside Attention: Cindy Kohler GARY L.ORS0 2724 Gateway Drive 0, C.Itohler Riverside CA 92501-3801 By Deputy Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and Tentative Tract Map 32741. State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension NIA Mr. Martin Magana _ 760.777.7068 project Location (include Count: West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, City of la Quinta, County of Riverside, California. project Descri Lion: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide t 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots for Village Builders 98. On October 5, 2004, the La Quinta City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and approved Tentative Tract Map 32741 to subdivide ± 15.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots by adopting Resolution 2004-068 (Environmental Assessment) and Resolution 2004-069 (Tentative Tract Map). This is to advise that the City of La Quinta has approved the above described project on October 5, 2004, as (X Lead Agency), and has .made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project [_will X will not] have a significant effect on the environment. 2. _ An Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures [ X were_ were not] made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [_ was X was not] adopted for this project. 5. Findings [ X were — were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Environmental Documents, with any comments, responses and record of project approval, are available to the General Public at: City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Martin Ma ana !�'" October 11 2004 Associate Planner Name/Signature (Public Agenc Date nitre COUNTY CLERK , Date received for filing at OPR: N/A ,t4eg. Declarallor�R G 2terminallon. Filed per 1152 PASTED Removed: Dept - By: Slate of California r:nunri ofRlverslde, 2 10 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title, location, name and address of project proponent (including county): Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 32741 Location: West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside. Project Proponent: Village Builders 98 121 Spear Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots. Findings of Exemption: This project was approved by the City Council on October 5, 2004 by adopting Resolution No. 2004-068 certifying the Environmental Assessment 2004-515 (See attached Resolution). Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings a fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record, the project will not individually, or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Martin Magan , Associate Planner City of La Quinta, California October 11, 2004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT Lead Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA County Agency of Filing: Riverside Project Title: EA 2004-515; TTM 32741 Project Applicant Name: MATHEWS, 74COB Project Applicant Address: 121 SPEAR PT., #250 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 Project Applicant: Private Entity Receipt # 200401222 Date: 10/13/2004 Document No: 200401222 Phone Number: CHECK APPLICABLE F , U. ❑ Environmental Impact Re 7ort ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ❑ Project Subject to Certi/i d Regulatory Programs X❑ County Administration F $64.00 0Project that is exe pt from fees (DeMinimis Exemption) ❑ Project that is exempt from fees (Notice of Exemption) Total Received $64.00 Signature and title ofperson receiving payment: Notes: NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) CITY OF LA QUINTA 1400 Tenth Street, Room #121 P. O. Box 1504 Sacramento CA 95814 La Quinta CA 92253 1 r—.JERS16E COUNTY X County Clerk County of Riverside Attention: Cindy Kohler 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside CA 92501-3801 OCT 1. 3 2004 GARY L. QRSO C. Kohler By 0, Deputy Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and Tentative Tract Map 32741. State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension N/A Mr. Martin Magana 760.777.7068 Project Location (include County): West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, City of la Quinta, County of Riverside, California. Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide ± 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots for Village Builders 98. On October 5, 2004, the La Quinta City Council certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and approved Tentative Tract Map 32741 to subdivide ± 15.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots by adopting Resolution 2004-068 (Environmental Assessment) and Resolution 2004-069 (Tentative Tract Map). This is to advise that the City of La Quinta has approved the above described project on October 5, 2004, as ( X Lead Agency), and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project [_will X will not] have a significant effect on the environment. 2. _ An Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and, X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures [ X were_ were not] made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [_ was X was not] adopted for this project. 5. Findings [ X were _ were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Environmental Documents, with any comments, responses and record of project approval, are available to the General Public at: Martin Ma ana /fK Name/Signature (Public Ag Date received for filing at OPR: N/A City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 October 11, 2004 Asso6 Date COUNTY CLdW N#q, DWarmilorMc Delerrnlnalion flied par P.R.C. 21152 POSTED OCT 13 2004 Removed; - _-- (ay: Dept. Qt�us� X +rar;lde, Skta of Califarnla STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT Lead Agency: CITY OF LA QUINTA County Agency of Filing: Riverside Project Title: EA 2004-515; TTM 32741 Project Applicant Name: MATHEWS, JACOB Project Applicant Address: 121 SPEAR ST., #250 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 Project Applicant: Private Entity Receipt # 200401222 Date: 10/13/2004 Document No: 200401222 Phone Number: CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ❑ Environmental Impact Report ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ❑ Project Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs RI County Administration Fee $64.00 ❑X Project that is exempt from fees (DeMinimis Exemption) ❑ Project that is exempt from fees (Notice of Exemption) Total Received $64.00 11-104111--1 Signature and title ofperson receiving payment: Notes. IL RESOLUTION NO. 2004-108 �' liW a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QU1NTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32742. CASE NO.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2004-515 APPLICANT: VILLAGE BUILDERS 98 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 5" day of October, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Village Builders 98 for certification of Environmental Assessment 2004- 515 for Tentative Tract Map 32742 to subdivide t 14.54 acres into 40 single- family lots and miscellaneous lots, generally located on the west side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55, more particularly described as follows: APN: 767-580-015 r-- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La auinta, California, did, on the 14' day of September, 2004, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Village Builders 98 for certification of Environmental Assessment 2004-515 for Tentative Tract Map 32742 to subdivide t 14.54 acres into 40 single-family lots and miscellaneous lots, generally located on the west side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55; and WHEREAS, said Environmental Assessment has complied with the requirements and rules to implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Resolution 83-63), in that Environmental Assessment 2004-515 has been completed and determined that although the project may have a significant adverse effects on the environment, mitigation measures have been imposed on the project to reduce impacts to a less than significant level; and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for certification; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following findings to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment: Resolution No. 2004-108 Environmental Assessment 2004-515 - village Builders 98 Adopted: October 5, 2004 Page 2 1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly, or directly, in that mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 2, The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory in that the site has been previously graded, and potential irripacts associated with cultural and paleontologic resources have been mitigated to a less than significant level. The majority of the site is covered in weeds, and that significant habitat is absent. Also, the project site is located outside the boundary of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan, therefore, impacts to biological and cultural resources are less than significant. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat on which the wildlife depends in that the subject site is covered in weeds, and significant habitat is absent from the site. The site is physically suitable for the proposed land division and currently, development exists in the immediate area which has reduced the amount of habitat suitable for any fish or wildlife habitat. 4. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, as the proposed project will add to the housing types offered to the City's residents, a goal of the General Plan. Significant effects on environmental factors will be reduced to less than significant levels as identified in the Environmental Assessment. 5. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity, as development patterns in the area will not be significantly affected by the proposed project in that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan vision for this area. Construction of the project will have no significant cumulative impacts. Resolatlon No. 2004-108 ,. Environmental Assessment 2004-515 — Village Builders 98 Adopted: October 5, 2004 Page 3 6. The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect the human population due to air quality impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non - attainment area for PM 10, and the site will generate PM 10. However, a number of mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce the potential impacts on air quality as identified in the Environmental Assessment. 7. There is no substantial evidence in light of the entire record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment in that mitigation measures have been imposed on the project that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 8. The City Council has considered Environmental Assessment 2004-515 and said Assessment reflects the independent judgment of the City. 9. The City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CAL Code Regulations 753.5(d). j� 10. The location and custodian of the City's records relating to this project is the Community Development Department located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the City Council for this Environmental Assessment. 2. That it does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 2004-515 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and, as stated. in the Environmental Assessment Checklist on file in the Community Development Department and attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 5`h day of October, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: Resolution No. 2004-108 Environmental Assessment 2004-515 - Village Builders 98 Adopted: October 5, 2004 Page 4 AYES: Council Members Henderson, Osborne, Perkins, Mayor Adolph NOES: Council Member Sniff ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None X D NALD OLPH, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: J GREEK, CMC, Jerk City of La Quinta, California (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. K HERI JENSON, Cit Att rney City of La Quinta, California Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project title: Tentative Tract Map 32742 2. Lead agency name and address: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 3. Contact person and phone number: Martin Magana 760-777-7125 4. Project location: West side of Monroe Street, approximately 150 feet south of Avenue 55. APN: 767-580-015 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Village Builders 98, LP 121 Spear Street, Suite 250 San Francisco, CA 94105 6. General plan designation: Low Density 7. Zoning: Low Density Residential Residential 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Tentative Tract Map to divide a 14.54 acre parcel into 40 single family residential lots, as well as lots for retention and streets. Streets within the project are proposed to be private. The lot size ranges from 9,200 s.f. to just over 15,000 s.f. Access will be provided on Monroe Street with no secondary access. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: North: Vacant, Single -Family Residential (Very Low-Density.Residential) South: Single -Family Residential, golf course (Low -Density Residential, Golf Course -OS) West: Single -Family Residential (Low -Density Residential,) . East: Monroe Street, Vacant, Agriculture (Low-Density'Residential/Agriculture/Equestrian Overlay) 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Coachella Valley Water District r--- -l- ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated -by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities / Service Systems Agriculture Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology / Water Quality Noise Recreation Air Quality Geology /Soils Land Use / Planning Population / Housing Transportation/Traffic Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR, or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature August 23, 2004 _ Date -2- EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well ,as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" '—' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. -3- 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? (General Plan Exhibit 3.6) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Aerial photograph) c) Substantially degrade the existing X visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Application materials) d) Create a new source of substantial X light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Application materials) I. a)-d) Monroe Street is not designated an Image Corridor in the General Plan. There are no significant scenic or topographic features on or near 'the subject property. The construction of single-family residential units on the site will not impact scenic vistas, and, is consistent with existing and proposed surrounding development. Impacts associated with aesthetics are expected to be insignificant. The primary source of light and glare upon build -out of the site will be from automobile headlights. With the construction of 40 residential units, this impact is expected to be less than significant. The lots' landscaping will also generate limited lighting increases. The City regulates lighting levels through a Dark Sky Ordinance and does not allow lighting to spill over onto adjacent property. Impacts will not be significant. -4- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: Would theproject: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide X Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (General Plan EIR p. III-21 ff.) b) Conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Zoning Map) c) Involve other changes in the existing X environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (General Plan Land Use Map) II. a)-c) The project site is vacant land, with single-family residences located on the western extremity of the site. The site is not in agricultural use, nor are there Williamson Act contracts on the land. The area to the east of the site does have scattered agricultural activity. However, the project site, being only about 14.5 acres, is not a viable site for substantial agriculture. Impacts to agricultural resources are expected to be negligible. -5- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct X implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) b) Violate any air quality standard or X contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, 2002 PM10 Plan for the Coachella Valley) d) Expose sensitive receptors to X substantial pollutant concentrations? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X substantial number of people? (Project Description, Aerial Photo, site inspection) _F III. a), b) & c) Automobile emissions are the largest contributor to air quality issues in the City. It is expected that vehicle trips generated by the proposed project will be the most significant generators of air pollutants. The proposed project will result in 40 single-family homes, which have the potential to generate up to 383 trips per day'. Based on this traffic generation, and an average trip length of 10 miles, the following emissions can be expected to be generated from the project site. "Trip Generation, 6t' Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, category 210, Single Family Detached. -6- Moving Exhaust Emission Projections at Project Buildout (pounds per da Ave. Trip Total Total No. Vehicle Trips/Day Length (miles) miles/day 383 x 10 = 3,830 _ _ _ PM10 PM10 PM10 Pollutant ROC CO NOX Exhaust Tire Wear Brake Wear Grams at 50 mph 344.70 8,962.20 1,838.40 - 38.30 38.30 Pounds at 50 mph 0.76 19.78 4.06 - 0.08 _ _ 0.08 SCAQMD Threshold- Qbs./day) 75 550 100 150 Assumes 1,055 ADT. Based on California Air Resources Board's EMFAC7G Emissions Model. Assumes Year 2005 summertime running conditions at 75'F, light duty autos catalytic. As demonstrated above, the proposed project will not exceed any of SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for chemical emissions. The project's potential impacts to air quality resulting from vehicular emissions are therefore expected to be less than significant. The City and Coachella Valley are a severe non -attainment area for PM10 (Particulates of 10 microns or less). The Valley's 2002 PM10 Plan adopted much stricter measures for the control of dust both during the construction process and during project operations. These include the following, to be included in conditions of approval for the proposed project: CONTROL MEASURE TITLE & CONTROL METHOD BCM-1 Further Control of Emissions from Construction Activities: Watering, chemical stabilization, wind fencing, revegetation, track -out control BCM-2 Disturbed Vacant Lands: Chemical stabilization, wind fencing, access restriction, revegetation BCM-3 Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Parking Lots: Paving, chemical stabilization, access restriction, revegetation BCM-4 Paved Road Dust: Minimal track -out, stabilization of unpaved road shoulders, clean streets maintenance The proposed project will generate dust during construction. Under mass grading conditions, this could result in the generation of 90.82 pounds per day, for a limited period while grading operations are active. The perimeter of the site has been landscaped, which will aid in reducing the blowing sand impacts on adjacent properties. The contractor will be required to submit a PM 10 Management Plan prior to initiation of any earth moving activity. In addition, the potential impacts associated with PM10 can be mitigated by the measures below. -7- Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. 2. Existing power sources should be utilized where feasible via temporary power poles to avoid on -site power generation. 3. Construction personnel shall be informed of ride sharing and transit opportunities. 4. Imported fill shall be adequately watered prior to transport, covered during transport, and watered prior to unloading on the project site. 5. Any portion of the site to be graded shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading activities. 6. Watering of the site or other soil stabilization method shall be employed on an on- going basis after the initiation of any grading activity on the site. Portions of the site that are actively being graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each work day. 7. Any area which remains undeveloped for a period of more than 30 days shall be stabilized using either chemical stabilizers or a desert wildflower mix hydroseed on the affected portion of the site. 8. Landscaping on the Monroe Street parkway shall be installed immediately following project precise grading, as will the project's perimeter wall. 9. SCAQMD Rule 403 shall be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction - related dirt on approach routes to the site. 10. All grading activities shall be suspended during first and second stage ozone episodes or when winds exceed 25 miles per hour Implementation of these mitigation measures will ensure that impacts associated with PM10 are mitigated to a less than significant level. III. d) & e) The project will consist of residential units and will not result in objectionable odors, nor will it expose residents to concentrations of pollutants. -8- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Signifieant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project - a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either X directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Letter dated July 7, 2004, J. Cornett) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any X riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Letter dated July 7, 2004, J. Cornett) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on X federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc:) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Letter dated July 7, 2004, J. Cornett) d) Interfere substantially with the X movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Letter dated July 7, 2004, J. Cornett) e) Conflict with any local policies or X ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (General Plan MEA, p. 73 ff.) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, X Natural Community Conservation Plan, or -9- other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (General Plan Exhibit 6.3) IV. a)-f) A letter was prepared by James Cornett for the proposed project. The letter indicates that the project site was surveyed for burrowing owls, and that none were sighted. The letter further states that.the majority of the site is covered in weeds, and that significant habitat is absent. The project site is located outside the boundary of the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. Impacts to biological resources are expected to be insignificant. -10- FMMi Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the ro'ect: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of a historical resource as defined in ' 15064.5? (Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey ... CRM Tech, June 2004) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? (Historical/ Archaeological Resources Survey... CRM Tech, June 2004) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Paleontologic Resources Assessment ... CRM Tech, June 2004) d) Disturb any human remains, including X those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (General Plan MEA p. 123 ff.) V. a)-b) & d) A cultural resources analysis was completed for the proposed project site2. The analysis included both records searches and on -site investigation. The on site investigation did not identify any resources. However, because of the high sensitivity of the area, the potential for buried resources is high. Should these resources be uncovered during project grading, impacts could be significant. In order to mitigate this potential impact, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1. A qualified archaeological monitor shall be present during all earth moving and grading activities. The monitor shall be empowered to stop or redirect activities on the site should a resource be identified. A final report shall be filed with the Community Development Department prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first house on the project site. V. c) A paleontologic survey was prepared for the proposed project site 3. The study found* that the project site is within the historic lake bed of ancient Lake Cahuilla. The study further found mollusk shells on the project site. Development of the site could result in significant impacts to paleontologic resources without mitigation. In order to assure that 2 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, prepared by CRM Tech, June 2004 3 "Paleontological Resources Assessment Report," prepared by CRM Tech, June 2004. -11. these potential impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1. A surface collection of mollusks shall be completed prior to initiation of any earth moving activity on the project site. 2. A paleontologist shall be present on site during all earth moving and trenching activities in areas of undisturbed lakebed soils. The paleontologist shall be empowered to stop or redirect earth moving activities to adequately investigate potential resources. The paleontologist shall be required to submit to the Community Development Department, for review and approval, a written report on all activities on the site prior to occupancy of the first building on the site. -12- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant significant w/ significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, X as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (MEA Exhibit 6.2) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (MEA X Exhibit 6.2) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, X including liquefaction? (MEA Exhibit 6.3) iv) Landslides? (MEA Exhibit 6.4) X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or X the loss of topsoil? (MEA Exhibit 6.5) d) Be located on expansive soil, as X defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property (MEA Exhibit 6.1) e) Have soils incapable of adequately X supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (General Plan Exhibit 8.1) VI. a)-e) The project site lies in a Zone III groundshaking zone. The property, as with the rest of the City, will be subject to significant ground movement in the event of a major r-- earthquake. The homes to be built on the site will be required to meet the City's and the State's standards for construction, which include Uniform Building Code requirements for seismic zones. The City Engineer - will require the preparation of site -specific geotechnical analysis in conjunction with the submittal of grading plans. This -13- requirement will ensure that impacts from ground shaking are reduced to a less than significant level. The project site is located in an area subject to liquefaction. Depending on the .depth to groundwater, special construction methods may need to be implemented on the project site. In order to assure that this potential impact is'mitigated to less than significant levels, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit to the City Engineer, for review and approval, a liquefaction study which determines whether the project will be subject to liquefaction. Any recommendations made in the study shall be implemented in project construction. The proposed project is not located in an area subject to rockfall or landslides. The site does not have expansive soils. The proposed project will be required to connect to the CVWD sanitary sewer system, and septic tanks will not be installed. The site is located in an area of moderate blow sand potential. The mitigation measures included above under air quality are designed to mitigate the potential impacts associated with blow sand at the project site to a less than significant level. - l4- r- 1 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would theproject: a) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Application materials) b) Create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle X hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) d) Be located on a site which is included X. on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (General Plan MEA, p. 95 ff.) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airportor public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (General Plan land use map) g) Impair implementation of or X -ghysically interfere with an adopted -15- emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (General -Plan MEA p. 95 ft) h) Expose people or structures to a X significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (General Plan land use map) VII. a)-h) The construction of 40 homes on the subject site will not have an impact on hazards and hazardous materials. The City implements Household Hazardous Waste programs through its trash hauler, which are designed to provide for safe disposal of hazardous substances generated in the home. Impacts are expected to be negligible. -16- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER UALITY -- Would theproject: a) Violate any water quality standards or X waste discharge requirements? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater X supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff. c) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) d) Substantially alter the existing X drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (General Plan EIR p. II1-187 ff.) e) Create or contribute runoff water X which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (General Plan EIR p. III-187 ff.) f) Place housing within a 100-year flood X -17- hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (General Plan EIR p. III- 187 ff.) g) Place within a 100-year flood hazard X area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Master Environmental Assessment Exhibit 6.6) VIII. a) & b) Domestic water is supplied to the project site by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The development of the site will result in the need for domestic water service use for residential use and for landscaping irrigation. The CVWD has prepared a Water Management Plan.which indicates that it has sufficient water sources to accommodate growth in its service area. The CVWD has implemented or is implementing water conservation, purchase and replenishment measures which will result in a surplus of water in the long term. The project proponent will be required to implement the City's water efficient landscaping and construction provisions, including requirements for water efficient fixtures and appliances, which will ensure that the least amount of water is utilized within the homes. The applicant will also be required to comply with the City's NPDES standards, requiring that potential pollutants not be allowed to enter surface waters. These City standards will assure that impacts to water quality and quantity will be less than significant. VIII. c) & d) The City requires that all projects retain the 100 year storm on site. A preliminary hydrology study was prepared to assess the needs of the project site 4. The study found that a system of pipes through the site, leading to a retention basin at the southeastern boundary of the project, will be sufficient to retain on -site flows. The City Engineer will also review final plans to assure that these conclusions are still applicable prior to the issuance of grading permits. Impacts associated with storm water drainage are therefore not expected to be significant. VIII. e)-g) The site is not located in a flood zone as designated by FEMA. 4 Preliminary Hydrology Report, prepared by MSA Consulting, July 2004. -18- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established X community? (Aerial photo) b) Conflict with any applicable land use X plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (General Plan Land Use Element) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat X conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 74 ff.) IX. a)-c) The project site is designated Low -Density Residential in the General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with this designation. The project site is not within the boundary of the mitigation fee for the Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. There will be no impacts to land use and planning. -19- Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a X known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 ff.) b) Result in the loss of availability of a X locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Master Environmental Assessment p. 71 f.) X. a) & b) The proposed project site is within the MRZ-1 Zone, and is therefore not considered to have potential for mineral resources. -20- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation X of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (General Plan MEA p. 111 ff.) b) Exposure of persons to or generation X of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (General Plan MEA p. 111 ff.) c) A substantial permanent increase in X ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. I I I ff.) d) A substantial temporary or periodic X increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (General Plan MEA p. III ff.) e) For a project located within an airport X land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) f) For a project within the vicinity of a X private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (General Plan land use map) XI. a)-f) The proposed project will result in a total of 40 single family units. The project will be f surrounded by a block wall, which will reduce noise levels on the site. Noise levels on Monroe in this area of the City are not expected to exceed the City's standards, because of the limited traffic generated in this area. -21- Noise will be generated during project construction. Sensitive receptors are located adjacent to the project site to the south, surrounded by a 6 foot block wall, and single- family residential units occur approximately 150 feet to the north. During construction, the adjacent units may experience a periodic increase in noise levels. The wall on the southern project will provide attenuation of the noise intrusions to a great extent. In addition, the project is required to construct its wall immediately following site grading (please see Air Quality section, above). This will provide attenuation for the single family residences located northerly of the site. Impacts associated with noise at the site are expected to be less than significant. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth X in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) b) Displace substantial numbers of X existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) c) Displace substantial numbers of X people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (General Plan, p. 9 ff., application materials) XII. a)-c) The construction of 40 homes will not induce substantial population growth. The site includes two mobile homes which will be removed prior to construction. This does not represent a significant displacement of either housing or people. Impacts associated with population and housing are expected to be negligible. -22- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Police protection? (General Plan MEA, p. 57) X Schools? (General Plan MEA, p. 52 ff.) X Parks? (General Plan; Recreation and Parks X Master Plan) Other public facilities? (General Plan MEA, X p. 46 ff.) XHI. a)Build-out of the site will have a less than significant impact on public services. The proposed project will be served by the County Sheriff and Fire Department, under City contract. Build -out of the proposed project will generate sales and property tax which will offset the costs of added police and fire services, as well as the costs of general government. The project will be required to pay the mandated school fees and development impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits to reduce the impacts to public services. -23- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of X existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Application materials) b) Does the project include recreational X facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Application materials) XIV. a) & b) The project proponent will be subject to park in lieu fees for the provision of recreation facilities throughout the City. -24- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is X substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (General Plan OR, p. III-29 ff.) b) Exceed, either individually or X cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (General Plan EIR, p. III-29 ff.) c) Result in a change in air traffic X patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (No air traffic involved in project) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a X design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Site Plan) e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? (TTM 32742) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (TTM 32742) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, X or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Project description) XV. a)-g) The development of the 40 homes will generate about 383 daily trips. The project is consistent with the General Plan designation for the property, and was therefore analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR. The traffic on Monroe at build -out of the General Plan -25- was expected to remain at acceptable levels of service in that analysis. Impacts associated with traffic are expected to be less than significant. The project does not include inadequate parking or unsafe designs. The site is located within the service area of SunLine Transit, and can be served by it. Overall impacts to traffic are expected to be less than significant. -26- Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment X requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) b) Require or result in the construction of X new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) c) Require or result in the construction of X new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) d) Have sufficient water supplies X available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 f.) e) Result in a determination by the X wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project=s projected demand in addition to the provider=s existing commitments? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient X permitted capacity to accommodate the project=s solid waste disposal needs? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) g) Comply with federal, state, and local X statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (General Plan MEA, p. 58 ff.) -27- XVI. a)-g) Utilities are available at the project site. The service providers for water, sewer, electricity and other utilities have facilities in the immediate vicinity of the site, and will collect connection and usage fees to balance the cost of providing services. The construction of the proposed project is expected to have less than significant impacts on utility providers. -28- 7— Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to X degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to X achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are X individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? d) Does the project have environmental X effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. a) The site has been previously graded, and potential impacts associated with cultural and paleontologic resources have been mitigated to a less than significant level. XVIL b) The proposed project will add to the housing types offered to the City's residents, a goal of the General Plan. XVII. c) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan vision for this, area. Construction of the project will have no significant cumulative impacts. -29- XVII. d) The proposed project has the potential to adversely affect human beings, due to air quality impacts. Since the Coachella Valley is in a non -attainment area for PM10, and the site will generate PM10, Section III above, includes a number of mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts on air quality. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Not applicable. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Not applicable. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with ' Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. Not applicable. -30- CITY OF LA QUINTA MONITORING PROGRAM FOR CEOA COMPLIANCE DATE: September 6, 2004 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 767-580-015 CASE NO.: Tentative Tract Map 32742 PROJECT LOCATION: West side of Monroe, about 150 feet south of Avenue 55. EA/EIR NO: 2004-515 APPROVAL DATE: October 5, 2004 APPLICANT: Village Builders 98, LP THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS THE CITY'S MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ABOVE CASE NUMBER SUMMARY MITIGATION MEASURES RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE CHECKED BY DATE III. AIR QUALITY Maintain construction equipment. Contractor Project Construction SCAQMD standards Utilize temporary power. City Engineer Prior to issuance of grading IID standards permits. Pre -water and stabilize soils. Building Department Prior to issuance of building Site inspection permits. Inform personnel of ridesharing and Community Development Prior to the issuance of PM 10 alterative transportation. Department grading permits Management Plan Stabilize undeveloped areas after 30 Building Department During construction. Site inspection days. Landscape Monroe at precise grading, Building Department During construction. Site inspection. and perimeter wall. Enforce SCAQMD Rule 403 Building Department During grading. Site inspection. Stop grading during winds of more than 25 mph., 1st and 2nd stage ozone Building Department During grading. Site inspection. episodes. SUMMARY MITIGATION RESPONSIBLE FOR TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE DATE MEASURES MONITORING CHECKED BY V. CULTURAL RESOURCES On -site archaeological monitor during Building Department During grading Inspection all grubbing, grading and trenching. Surface collection of molluscs Community Development Prior to grading Report required. Department On -site paleontologic monitor during Building Department During grading Inspection all grubbing, grading and trenching SUAUWARY MITIGATIONPRESPONSIBLE FOR TIMING CRITERIA COMPLIANCE DATE MEASURES NITORING CHECKED BY VI. GEOLOGY & SOILS Receive approval for liquefaction eer Prior to grading permits Approval of study study PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 CASE NO.: AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 APPLICANT: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 241h day of June, 2014, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, as continued from the regularly -scheduled Public Hearing on June 10, 2014, to consider a request by Monterra Properties, LLC to reconfigure a recorded map located along Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard, more particularly described as: APN: 767-860-001 to 767-860-042 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 30, 2014, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 13.12.115 of the Municipal Code to justify recommendation of said Amended Final Map: A. The proposed amended final map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed map conforms to the design guidelines and standards of the General Plan for Low Density Residential designated properties, as set forth in the Land Use Element, in that it will facilitate the construction of additional residential options while maintaining residential development standards including setbacks, pad elevations, and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development. The project density will not change from the original map and is consistent with the Low Density Residential land use designation of up to four dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. B. The design or improvement of the proposed amended final map is consistent with the city General Plan in that its street and parcel design are in conformance with applicable goals, policies, and development standards, and Planning Commission Resolution 2014 - Amended Final Map 32742 Monterra (Monterra Properties, LLC) Adopted: June 24, 2014 Page 2 will provide adequate infrastructure and public utilities. C. The design of the amended final map and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Community Development Department has prepared an Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15164. This is an Addendum to Environmental Assessment 2004-515 that the City Council certified on October 5, 2004 for Tentative Tract Map 32742. D. The design of the amended final map and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. As conditioned, the proposed map will not result in any increased hazard to public health or welfare, as the design has been reviewed by the appropriate responsible agencies for health and safety issues, with none identified. E. The site of the proposed amended final map is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development. As conditioned, the proposed design of the subdivision is physically compatible with the site with regards to level topography for the type of land use designation and potential development of the subject property, and in consideration of existing residential development in the surrounding area. F. As conditioned, the proposed amended final map is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of this code, and the Subdivision Map Act. G. As conditioned, the design of the amended final map will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that none presently exist and access is provided within the project and to adjacent public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1 . That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case; SECTION 2. That it does hereby approve Amended Final Map 32742, for the Planning Commission Resolution 2014 - Amended Final Map 32742 Monterra (Monterra Properties, LLC) Adopted: June 24, 2014 Page 3 reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 241" day of June, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: KATIE BARROWS, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: LES JOHNSON, Community Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 24, 2014 PAGE 1 OF 25 GFNFRAI 1 . The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code § § 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-guinta.org. 3. Prior to issuance of any residential building permits, all conditions of approval shall be satisfied. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region, Permit) • La Quinta Community Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Sheet (Public Management Improvement PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 2 OF 25 • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 3 OF 25 Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by any site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the following conditions of approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 4 OF 25 conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer or the HOA over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 13. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 14. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) — The standard 55 feet from the centerline of Monroe Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 5 OF 25 right of way. 15. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right- of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 16. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Private Residential Streets measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 36-foot travel width. B. CUL DE SACS 1) The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger as shown on the tentative map. 17. Right-of-way geometry for standard dul-de-sacs and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 18. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1 " equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement 19. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right- P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 6 OF 25 of -ways shown on the approved Amended Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 20. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 21. The applicant shall abandon or relocate all existing easements over buildable lots particularly the easements traversing Lots 11 through 15 along the westerly property line and Lots 4, 27 through 29. The applicant shall also notify the owner of Lot 15 of the existing easement for ingress and egress along the northerly 40 feet of Lot 15. 22. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 20-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Amended Final Map. 23. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Amended Final Map. 24. Direct vehicular access to Monroe Street from lots with frontage along Monroe Street is restricted, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 7 OF 25 25. The secondary access on Monroe Street shall be for right turn out only. No right turn in movement is allowed. 26. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 27. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. FINAL MAPS 28. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1 " = 40' scale. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 29. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 30. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal B. PM 10 Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 8 OF 25 C. SWPPP 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. Off -Site Street Improvements/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical F. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 " = 4' Vertical NOTE: E through G to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) The following plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department for review and approval. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise athorized by the Building and Safety Director in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvements plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. H. On -Site Residential Precise Grading Plan 1 " = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formatted approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 9 OF 25 limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrant) and Street name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 31. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.la- quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 32. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 33. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 34. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 10 OF 25 same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 35. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 36. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 37. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20 % Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 38. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 11 OF 25 unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1 /2" x 11 " Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 39. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 40. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 41. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 42. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 12 OF 25 D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 43. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 44. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1 .5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 45. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 13 OF 25 Conditions of Approval. 46. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 47. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 48. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. �7 7e\I0IeTdd 49. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Amended Tract Map No. 32742. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 50. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 14 OF 25 51. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 52. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 53. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 54. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 55. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 56. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 57. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 58. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 15 OF 25 59. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 60. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-201 3-0011. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 60. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 61. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1 MONTERRA\PH 1 15) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA PC MAP COAs.doc 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 16 OF 25 62. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 63. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 65. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 66. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial): Widen the west side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Amended Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the west side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 1_MONTERRA\PH 1 (5) Amd Final Map 32742 MONTERRA_PC MAP COAs.doc 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 17 OF 25 conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The west curb face shall be located forty three feet (43') west of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit) Other required improvements in the Monroe Street right or way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. c) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within 5 feet of the multi -use trail at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. d) Half width of an 18' - foot wide raised landscaped median along the entire boundary of the Amended Tentative Tract Map as approved by the City Engineer. Left turn out and left turn in movements are restricted. e) Improvements to restrict the right turn in movement to the Monroe Street access as approved by the City Engineer. f) Establish a benchmark in the Monroe Street right of way and file a record of the benchmark with the County of Riverside. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 18 OF 25 The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Construct full 36-foot wide travel width improvements measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line plus curb and gutter where the residential streets are double loaded. 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb similar to the layout shown on the rough grading plan. 67. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Primary Arterial 4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 68. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 19 OF 25 operations until mix designs are approved. 69. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 70. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. CONSTRUCTION 71. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION 72. The applicant shall comply with Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans), LQMC. 73. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, common lots and park areas. 74. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a landscape architect licensed in California. 75. The applicant shall submit all landscape plans for approval by the Community Development Department with green sheet sign off by the Public Works Department. When plan checking has been completed by the Community Development Department, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 20 OF 25 and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the Community Development Director. Landscape plans for landscaped medians on public streets shall be approved by the both the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. Where City Engineer approval is not required, the applicant shall submit for green sheet approval by the Public Works Department. Final landscape plans for on -site planting shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of first building permit. Final plans shall include all landscaping associated with this project. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the Community Development Director. 76. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Community Development Director. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public streets. 77. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" latest edition, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. PUBLIC SERVICES 78. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and as approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 79. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance), LQMC. 80. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 21 OF 25 maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, stormwater BMPs, and common areas. FEES AND DEPOSITS 81. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 82. Effective January 1st 2011 all one/two family dwellings and townhouses will require an automatic residential fire sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with section HCD R313.3 or NFPA 13D. 83. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 500 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2-hour duration at 20 PSI. 84. For any buildings with public access, provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering a fire flow 2500 gallons per minute for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the construction site. 85. Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall furnish two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. 86. Prior to issuance of building permits, the water system for fire protection must be provided as approved by the Fire Department and the local water authority. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 22 OF 25 87. Blue dot retro-reflectors pavement markers on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicated location of the fire hydrant. 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org) 88. Fire Apparatus access road shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire Department Standard number 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org). Access lanes will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 89. An approved Fire Department access key lock box shall be installed next to the approved Fire Department access door to the building. If the buildings are protected with an alarm system, the lock box shall be required to have tampered monitoring. Required order forms and installation standards may be obtained at the Fire Department. 90. Any turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot turning radius. 91. All structures shall be accessible from an approved roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the first floor. 92. The minimum dimensions for access roads and gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. 93. Roadways may not exceed 660 feet without secondary access. This access may be restricted to emergency vehicles only however public egress must be unrestricted. 94. Any gate providing access from a road shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used. 95. Gates may be automatic or manual and shall be equipped with a rapid entry PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 23 OF 25 system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not exceed 30 pounds. Gates activated by a rapid system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Automatic gates shall be provided with a power backup. 96. LOT J: Exit only and Emergency Access — If an emergency access is pursued at a later date, parking is allowed on one side of the street providing that a minimum 20 foot clearance and unobstructed width is provided. 97. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane printing and/or signs. MISCELLANEOUS 98. The applicant shall disclose all easements on any lot within the proposed map to potential buyers prior to the sale of a lot within the tract map. 99. The applicant shall submit proof of abandoned easements on Lots 4, 15, 27, 28, and 29 prior to the issuance of building permits for those lots. 100. The applicant shall comply with the following Historical/Archaeological and Paleontological conditions: A. Historical/Archeological 1) The site shall be monitored during on- and off -site trenching and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the City prior to issuance of first earth -moving or clearing permit. The Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla, Augustine, and Cabazon Band of Mission Indians shall be contacted to determine if a tribe member is to be included as an archaeological monitor. 2) The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 24 OF 25 3) Collected archaelogical resources shall be properly packaged for long term curation, in polyethylene self -seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid -free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. B. Paleontological 1) On- and off -site monitoring of earth -moving and grading in areas identified as likely to contain paleontological resources shall be conducted by a qualified paleontological monitor. The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Proof that a monitor has been retained shall be given to City prior to issuance of first earth - moving permit, or before any clearing of the site is begun. 2) Recovered specimens shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. 3) A report of findings with an appended itemized inventory of specimens shall be submitted to the City prior to the first occupancy of a residence being granted by the City. The report shall include pertinent discussions of the significance of all recovered resources where appropriate. The report and inventory, when submitted will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. 4) Collected resources and related reports, etc. shall be given to the City for curation. Packaging of resources, reports, etc. shall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2014- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 MONTERRA (MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC) JUNE 10, 2014 PAGE 25 OF 25 comply with standards commonly used in the paleontological industry. 101. The applicant shall comply with all of the mitigation measures imposed on the project to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent shall submit to the City Engineer, for review and approval, a liquefaction study which determines whether the project will be subject to liquefaction. Any recommendations made in the study shall be implemented in project construction. 102. Prior to issuance of a building permit for residential units, a Modification by Applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department in order to revise the landscaping plan to match the reconfigured community layout (including exit -only access gate details). ATTACHMENT 1 Project Information CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-636 AMENDED FINAL MAP 32742 APPLICANT: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC ARCHITECT: N/A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: N/A ENGINEER: HEITEC CONSULTING REQUEST: RECONFIGURE RECORDED MAP IN ORDER TO RELOCATE ACCESS FROM MONROE STREET TO BROWN DEER PARK LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 52 AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL VACANT, UN -ENTITLED LAND SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/GOLF COURSE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY EAST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY VACANT LAND WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING PRIVATE RESIDENCE �Yll : 1 r &Igi] [l INFORMATION: TR 32742 (40 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS) TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED OCTOBER 5, 2004 FINAL MAP APPROVED NOVEMBER 6, 2007 RECORDED DECEMBER 4, 2007 T r e i yr , s' x a. , Y ; - n ! I r - 74 CM) if A . sW� Z - i. INI LA, I e :M .{ �' r r Mki D' _- a .T >7 6. O n f 7 " R " "► r ° y - } _ . S %• t .� � �'' �� � �..,�{•- 1 - b ;.� . Jam. `� , � r s� - _ T ERGULC �►� �� 1 , _ 5 , 4 i,4i • n —. - .,'��Y aF.`_�01f:� �"-�1'�,�:.._} _— • - _ £ ` ,.y.. 6�`Wv:.-:c�.-�:;,, "9fi.x: - . '� :�' _ '4-: IFS, r� _ 4¢.- � f •.1 .., _ _ w _ 4 �4 '•' .a c ... ups-,'^. �.� n , ., x c- ....AR,... ., fir,.• , - junk AP -747 IL Y r]I i a - e t �, _�,a�' { "ice � `, • � ' 4 .A• x.: •K�R.�. _ r . -.'f. " �: R • ma's � 1 � .,� '� 1.. - .a �° � • • v,h ;� # . R � 1y - Wit' - ,C.r:➢_' r y„_• ,. , r M3�- R a = J i eN° � - 1 �°.�kiele.'�`M.3x"'^� ,•'G=.F�l.I � r A.A. r `v a - BROWN DEER PARK -- z, , • , 1 4 -• r , Rr' a•' y�, r' Kr ,1 •� do y g �r �r I WR5 ' . may■ - r r r a r d '-! 10 • Wit. • 6 « at' •�` A.1r R r c T . J. r � ply � ,+'► IF 4F i oil c, R �. 1 rz qt 46 MW 40 01 tic _• P '.r` . r i ex ��' tie '. w.. F, S w''•T - '.Aj, S {i• ',Y+ n sr,;4 ray x ;, �_ �`�" 4 N /fi 7 t' . •T .r h Y 1 nAe Monterra Project Area Site Map ATTACHMENT 2 D D C) 2 June 10, 2014 N LOJ c City of La Quinta Planning Division �y G� o]IF Community Development Department ATTACHMENT 3 0 50 100 200 400 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=100' CIiY of u, QUINTA Plea Set No. N 89'55'00" 1318.06' <1318.06'> A 3 3 I I I I I I I f 1 - - - —I MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <N 89'55'00" E 2636.135 I r) I [N 89'32'31 " E 2636.18] I `��' �. J I I I I (N 89'32' 14 ° E 2636.20) I I r I N 89'55'00" E 12536,13' I I I 1 3 N 89'55'00" E r " � I r� 45.03 (2}-tip 3 ` ^ S 89'55'00" W 1273.04' J k J CD II�� II o V� 14 l N 89'55'00" E 1243.04' 30.02' I k R 37' 0� u ' 3$ oc 15 1s 17 22 23 24 29 30 31 3s 37 �-- o II 5 4 O Z � Q LO cn V CN o � N 14 Z 1S 21 w R 25 28 32 35 39 4 I 1 w u., 00 II wn IN 13 L� © � � � 2a � 2s 27 � ° � 34 � °` � � 1 LOT 'A' FOUR SEASONS PLACE 12 .� 10 9 S 7 s 5 4 3 2 1 C ! ! (S 89'32' 14 " W) LOT �C� 25 30' I �y r Am 4,S 89-55'00 " K 1' 88.12' L O I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — .-� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r I BROWN DEER PARK 30.02'� �%� m o � r�� 1- L - L - -1- - _.1 - - -J - - - Q CN a C) ll to:n . AIRPORT BOULEVARD N 89'50'23" W 2637.18' (N 89-46'50" E 2637.30') <N 89'50'23" W 2637.185 22 SHEET 3 O? 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA aUIN rA COUN►Y OF RWRS E, STA TE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO., 32742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUM, RANG 7 EAST, SB.B.M 0 HACKER fN61NffRING, INC. JUNE,2006 SURVEYOR'S NOTES INDICATES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED. 0 INDICATES SET 1" I.P. WITH PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED "LS 5128", FLUSH. d INDICATES COPPERWELD STAMPED 'LS 5128" FLUSH. NAIL AND TAG STAMPED L.S. 5128 TO BE SET ON CURB AT THE PROJECTION OF SIDE LOT LINES IN LIEU OF FRONT PROPERTY CORNERS AND ON THE FOOTING OF BLOCK WALLS AT REAR PROPERTY CORNERS. [ ] INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 26769, M.B. 235/40-41. ( } INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 29136, M.B. 28514-16. < > INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 32879, M.B. 399/3-20. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 40 NUMBERED LOTS AND 9 LETTERED LOTS. 14.21 ACRES GROSS MONUMENT DATA Q FOUND 2X2 WITH . TACK, DOWN 0.1 ', WITH 2-2 FOOT TIES, NO REF, ACCEPTED AS S.E. CORNER SECTION 15. FOUND 2" IRON PIPE, NO TAG, DOWN 1.3 FEET, IN LIEU OF TAG STAMPED "LS 3561 " PER M.B. 203/37-50 AND M.B. 28514 -16, ACCEPTED AS SOUTH 114 CORNER SECTION 15. [3] FOUND I- IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC PLUG, ILLEGIBLE, FLUSH, IN LIEU OF PLUG STAMPED RCE 76807" PER P.M.B. 90/83-85 AND M.B. 28514-16, ACCEPTED AS EAST 114 CORNER SECTION 15. []4 FOUND SPIKE AND WASHER STAMPED LS 4293" NO REF. ® FOUND I- IRON PIPE TAGGED 'RCE 264017, FLUSH, PER M.B. 39913-20, ACCEPTED AS CENTER 114 CORNER SECTION 15. EASEMENT DA TA IN FAVOR OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR WATER PIPELINES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 4, 1949 IN BOOK 1073, PAGE 366, O.R. IN FAVOR OF CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR UTILITIES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 110959, O.R., RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1966. 3 IN FAVOR OF ROBERT D. WAGGONER AND MILDRED C. WAGGONER FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 157027, O.R., RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1972. Q IN FAVOR OF DAVID L. ARMSTRONG FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12„ 1957 IN BOOK 2146, PAGE 505 OF DEEDS. IN FAVOR OF DAN P. WHITNER, ET AL BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 112254, O.R_ RECORDED AUGUST 29, 1974. PS,4P " (PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT) NORTHING: 2,241,807.34 FASTING: 6,487,561.77 �R-& NAD83 CALIFORNIA 9 COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 64 COTD \ 'y,'��a (COLLEGE OF THE DESERT) N NORTHING: 2, 210,179.63 66 EASTI NG: 6, 520, 051.41 o cc NAD83 CALIFORNIA r(2 ! COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 6 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON A GRID 'oS�, s,e 3 z /I BEARING (NAD83) BETWEEN NATIONAL 2 09'�8 !y J GEODETIC SURVEY HORIZONTAL ORDER ;4" STATIONS "PSAP" (PID AJ1912) AIRPORT BOULEVARD .�a AND "COTD" (PID AJ1852 . N 89'50'23" W 2637.18 1 2L) BASIS OF BEARINGS 12/20/06 051 107-F0.z CA) ATTACHMENT 4 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HEREBY RETAIN LOTS W' THROUGH "E'; INCLUSIVE, LOT "I" AND LOT "J'; INDICATED AS "PRIVATE STREET" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT "G" AND LOT "K" INDICATED AS "LANDSCAPE" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT "F'; INDICATED AS "DRAINAGE AND RETENTION PURPOSES" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA LOT "H" (MONROE STREET) FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA A 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA THE EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES ALONG WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SERVICE AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES OVER LOTS W, THROUGH "E'; INCLUSIVE, LOT "I" AND LOT "J , DESIGNATED AS "PRIVATE STREET'; AS SHOWN HEREON. WE HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION TO THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, AN EASEMENT OVER ALL PRIVATE STREETS SHOWN ON THIS MAP AND AN ADDITIONAL 10 FEET IN WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES AND ADJACENT TO ALL PRIVATE STREETS AND/OR PUBLIC STREETS SHOWN ON THIS MAP, FOR THE EXCAVATION, LAYING, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, INSPECTION, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, AND REMOVAL OF ELECTRICAL LINES, WIRES, CABLES, DUCTS, SUPPORTS, FIXTURES, FACILITIES, AND APPURTENANCES WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND WITHIN SAME FOR MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. WE HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION TO THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, EASEMENTS FOR SANITATION AND DOMESTIC WATER PURPOSES OVER LOTS W' THROUGH "E';LOT "I" AND LOT "J'; DESIGNATED AS "PRIVATE STREET" AND LOT "G" AND LOT "K'; DESIGNATED AS "LANDSCAPE" THE EASEMENTS SO DEDICATED INCLUDE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID LANDS, TO SURVEY, CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT, LAY, RELAY, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, CONTROL, USE AND REMOVE PIPELINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, AND TO REMOVE OBJECTS INTERFERING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE THEREOF. MONTERRA PROPERTIES, LLC, A MONTANA LIMITED LIABLITY COMPANY MARK LADEDA, MANAGER NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ON ________________ BEFORE ME, --------------- A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED -------------------------------- WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. SIGNATURE NOTE SEE SHEET 2 FOR TRUSTEE'S SIGNATURE IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO* 32 742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF NORTHEAST 114 OF SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.B.M. HEITEC JANUARY 2014 A0-�C O N S U L T I N G TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE . DATED: DON KENT, COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY. DEPUTY TAX BOND CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $ __________ HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. CASH TAX BOND DATED: DON KENT COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR KECIA HARPER -THEM CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY: DEPUTY BY. DEPUTY CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE GOV. CODE SEC. 27281 THE IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, AN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, HEREBY ACCEPTS BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SAID DISTRICT AS PER RESOLUTION NO. 15-90, DATED MARCH 22, 1990 AND THE GRANTEE CONSENTS TO RECORDATION. DA 2014 BY.• DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISOR COACHELLA POWER SECTION SIGNATURE OMISSIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED: 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - FOR WATER PIPE LINES, RECORDED MAY 4, 1949 IN BOOK 1073, PAGE 366, O.R. 2. CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY - FOR UTILITY PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1966 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 110959, O.R. 3. ROBERT D. WAGGONER AND MILDRED C. WAGGONER - FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1972 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 157027, O.R. CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDER AUTHORITY GRANTED TO ME BY RESOLUTION NO. 78-248, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 1978, 1 ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT THE DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND SANITATION PURPOSES AS OFFERED HEREON. JULIA FERNANDEZ, SECRETARY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DATED:______________, 2014 RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THIS ___ DAY OF _________ , 2014, AT ___ AM/PM IN BOOK _-- OF MAPS, AT PAGES -------- AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA NO. FEE LARRY W. WARD, COUNTY ASSESSOR -CLERK -RECORDER DEPUTY SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE. LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF EHLINE DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DURING DECEMBER, 2005. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS WITHIN ONE YEAR OF MAP RECORDATION; AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. ----------------------------- DATED: ------------ 2015 (((Exp. HA-DAVID HACKERPROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5128 EXP. 06/30/15 6-30-2015 . 5128 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENTTF I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP OF AMENDED TRACT NO. 32742 CONSISTING OF FOUR (4) SHEETS, THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ANY LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. DATED: TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF LA QUINTA R.C.E. 45843, EXP. 12131114 CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT 2014 I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP OF AMENDED TRACT NO. 32742 CONSISTING OF FOUR (4) SHEETS AND I AM SATISFIED THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATED: ERIC A. NELSON, ACTING CITY SURVEYOR P.L.S. 5563, EXP. 9130115 CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT 2014 I, SUSAN MAYSELS, CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY STATE THAT SAID CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON ___ _________ ____, _____ APPROVED THE WITHIN MAP OF AMENDED TRACT MAP NO. 32742, AND ACCEPTS THE DEDICATION OF LOT "H" (MONROE STREET) FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENTS AND ALSO THE EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SERVICE AND EMERGENCY ACCESS AND THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DEDICATED HEREON; SUSAN MAYSELS CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DATED: 2014 06117/14 051107-F01 SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 32742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF NORTHEAST 114 OF SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.B.M. HEITEC ��C D N S U L T I N G TRUSTEE FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, TRUSTEE UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED AUGUST 31, 2013 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2013-0428114, O.R. 50 NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ON ________________ BEFORE ME, --------------- A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. SIGNATURE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ON ________ BEFORE ME, -------------- A NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAMES) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. SIGNATURE 06117114 051107-F02A 0 50 100 200 400 GRAPHIC SCALE. 1 "=100' iq ofN N -p I v �w N rn N rn 15 Z 22 - - - L - - - - - I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - - MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 69 1 1 1 6769 1 1 1 261 I Not t 2 '� I I 235/49 I 1 1 TRACT 40,41 1 Mg' I I 1 23511 � I 1 I [N 89°3231 " E I 2636.18'] 1 1 I I 1 1 (N 89°32'14" E 1 2636.20') 1 1 I I I 1 I N 89°55'00" E 1 2636.13' 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 t 4N89°55'00"E -L -1 --I --I -- I -- I --�15 J45.03 2 3 S 89°55'00" W 1273.04' 2 3 tP 0 N 0 w 0 0 C 11 I► II N 89°55'00" E 11�218.03' SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 32742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH 112 OF NORTHEAST 114 OF SOUTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S B.B.M. HEITEC JANUARY 2014 ��C ❑ N S U L T I N G SURVEYOR'S NOTES INDICATES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED. p INDICATES FOUND 1" I.P. WITH PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED "LS 5128 , FLUSH, PER M.B. 427161-64. I A INDICATES FOUND COPPERWELD STAMPED "LS 5128", FLUSH, PER M.B. 427161-64. I 14 N �c ocu n Z 30.021 : r 15 16 17 23 22 24 29 30 31 37 36 38 V U U U 14 z 18 21 w 25 28 > 32 35 w 39 Wuj 6 13 w 19 20 z_ 26 27 33 34 � 40 ramr^^ rram^^ BROWN DEER PARK 30 ` 102'1 1 � I I I I I I I I I 93 147 I I I I I I I I I I I N�. 21 4 1 1 1 I I I I I I I TRACT I`� 1 60�16 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 292/ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I M,�• I I I I I I �� �� I \y I I II AIRPORT BOULEVARD N 89°50'23" W 2637.18' (N 89°46'50" E 2637.30') m i 30' CoC/) 22 23 NAIL AND TAG STAMPED L.S. 5128 TO BE SET ON CURB AT THE PROJECTION OF SIDE LOT LINES IN LIEU OF FRONT PROPERTY CORNERS AND ON THE FOOTING OF BLOCK WALLS AT REAR PROPERTY CORNERS. ] INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 26769, M.B. 235140-41. ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 29136, M.B. 28514-16. INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 40 NUMBERED LOTS AND 9 LETTERED LOTS. 14.21 ACRES GROSS MONUMENT DATA ❑1 FOUND 2X2 WITH TACK, DOWN 0.1 ', WITH 2-2 FOOT TIES, NO REF, ACCEPTED AS S.E. CORNER SECTION 15. ] FOUND 2" IRON PIPE, NO TAG, DOWN 1.3 FEET, IN LIEU OF TAG STAMPED Is 3561 " PER M.B. 203137-50 AND M.B. 28514-16, ACCEPTED AS SOUTH 114 CORNER SECTION 15. ❑3 FOUND 1 " IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC PLUG, ILLEGIBLE, FLUSH, IN LIEU OF PLUG STAMPED "RCE 16807" PER P.M.B. 90/83-85 AND M.B. 285/4-16, ACCEPTED AS EAST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 15. ® FOUND SPIKE AND WASHER STAMPED IS 4293'; NO REF. 5❑ FOUND I" IRON PIPE TAGGED "RCE 6284", DOWN 0.5 FOOT PER P.M.B. 90183-85 AND M.B. 285/4-16., ACCEPTED AS CENTER 114 CORNER SECTION 15. EASEMENT DATA 0 IN FAVOR OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR WATER PIPELINES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 4, 1949 IN BOOK 1073, PAGE 366, O.R. 20 IN FAVOR OF CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR UTILITIES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 110959, O.R., RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1966. 0 IN FAVOR OF ROBERT D. WAGGONER AND MILDRED C. WAGGONER FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT NO. 157027, O.R., RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1972. ® IN FAVOR OF DAVID L. ARMSTRONG FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES BY VIRTUE OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1957 IN BOOK 2146, PAGE 505 OF DEEDS. PSAP \ ,� (PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT) m NORTHING: 2, 24180 7.5 667 EASTING: 6, 487, 561.6238 p 'w \ �`9� NAD83 CALIFORNIA ���- \ \ - COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 6 t"y 101- 0 N lid � c COTD 00 (COLLEGE OF THE DESERT) NORTHING: 2,210,179.8685 �'�OJ o EASTING: 6, 520, 051.2605 SN NAD83 CALIFORNIA >>OS A8S8 z COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 6 2 60,9 , 88'' AIRPORT BOULEVARD_ N 89°50'23" W V 2637.18' 1 BASIS OF BEARINGS 06117114 051107—F02 N 89°55'00" E 45.03' 1 2 Q 0 O 0 �r 0 N O Ci w o ^ O r,� L o O N O CURVE TABLE "URVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA C1 12.21' 109.50' 6°23'20" C20 141.13' 38.50' 210°01'07' C39 35.00' 38.50' 52*05'14" C59 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C2 141.13' 38.50' 210°01 '07' C21 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'44" C40 39.10' 38.50' 58° 11 ' 11 " C60 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C3 15.27' 38.50' 22°43'03" C22 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 14" C41 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 13" C61 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C4 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 13" C23 39.10' 38.50' 58° 11 ' 11 " C42 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'45" C62 12.21 ' 109.50' 6°23'20" C5 35.26' 38.50' 52°2829" C24 35.00' 38.50' 52*05'13" C43 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'34" C63 141,13' 38.50' 210°01'07' C6 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 14" C25 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'45" C44 12.21 ' 109.50' 6°23'20" C64 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'44" , 20.60 38.50 ,„ 30°39 08 C26 , 28.69 , 109.50 ,» 15°00 34 C45 , 16.47 109.50 , 8°37 14 C65 , 35.00 , 38.50 52°05 14 » C8 48.25' 109.50' 25° 14'47" C27 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C46 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '28" C66 39.10' 38.50' 58° 11 ' 11 " C9 8.77' 109.50' 4°3523" C28 16.48' 109.50' 8°37' 14" C47 12.13' 24.50' 28°21 '28" C67 35.00' 38.50' 52°05' 13" C 10 39.48' 109.50' 20°3924" C29 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C48 12.13' 24.50' 28°21 '27" C68 16.01 ' 38.50' 23°49'45" C 11 116.65' 60.50' 110*2826' C30 32.07' 24.50' 74°5955" C49 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '27" C69 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'34" C 12 6.3 1' 60.50' 5°58' 17" C31 41.15' 60.50' 51 °02'02" C50 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '27" C70 12.21 ' 109.50' 6°23'20" C 13 52.47' 60.50' 49°41 ' 17" C32 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C51 12.13' 24.50' 28°21 '27" C71 16.48' 109.50' 8°37' 14" C14 35.50' 60.50' 33°37'12" C33 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C52 12.13' 24.50' 28°21'28" C72 54.19' 34.50' 90°00'00" C 15 22.38' 60.50' 21 ° 11 '40" C34 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C53 12.62' 25.50' 28°21 '28" C73 28.68' 109.50' 15°00'33" C 16 19.56' 109.50' 10° 14' 13" C35 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C54 5.80' 25.50' 13°01 '43" C74 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C 17 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C36 12.2 1' 109.50' 6°23'20" C55 6.82' 25.50' 15' 19'44" C75 23.08' 24.50' 36°01 '58" C 18 16.47' 109.50' 8°37' 13" C37 141.13' 38.50' 10°01 '07" C56 0.41 ' 25.50' 0°5524 " C76 10.31 ' 60.50' 09°45'53" C19 12.21' 1 109.50' 6°23'20" C38 16.01' 38.50' 23°49'44 C57 12.21' 25.50' 27°26'04" C77 16.17' 24.50' 37°48'49" C58 38.48' 24.50' 90°00'00" C78 2.29' 24.50' 05°21'17" N 89°55'00" E 1218.03' SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO* 32 742 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF TRACT NO. 32742, RECORDED IN BOOK 427, PAGES 61 THROUGH 64, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, AND SITUATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.B.M. HEITEC ��0 O N S U L T I N G JANUARY 2014 0 30 60 120 240 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "= 60' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N57°50'26 "E 18.11 ' L6 N58°42'36 "E 17.14' L2 N61 °08'54 "W 17.37' L7 N58°5236 "W 17.14' L3 N58°5236 "W 17.14' L8 N58°4236 "E 17.14' L4 N58°42'36 "E 17.14' L9 N80° 13' 16 "W 46.34' L-5 N58°5236 "W 17.14' 68.30' 100.00' 100.00' 102.00' 103.00' 102.00' 102.00' 103.00' 102.00' 102.00' 103.00' 110.71 ' 5.01 ' o �� 16 �� �_ o,)� �- 00 DWI � � O �_ �� �' p� 00 W, 23 �. 00 Lo � I �, O �_ �� �_ oOw 00 �, 0 ; I 30 , � p �� �� �o WI ' �o 37 , I �, 0 N �, 15 �N �I o0 p O ^ 111,190 SF '- o ^ 17 �� o 00 I �� o0 N 22 0 ^ 11 572 SF n O .- 24 � O of o N � 00 )I Ln o0 29 O .- "� O 31 O of 11,572 SF oI o N 0� � �, p� 36 n O 38 z o111,572 SFoI O O I 23,079 SF z �" o z SF N� C)1 14Lo pI � z o z n 14,972 SF N NI 14,972 SF � � z I o z 14,972 SF N cn Nl 14,972 SF 06 `;' o z o 14,972 SF NI NI 16,513 SF ca ^ co),749 co 41&1. 8S 8� I �� ' �6 o 8S ?�6 • C 6 6 �a $ R� `� ?�6' ` C 40 �� $ �`� �'� oo ��36„ C 2 3 lk`L �G C 7 6 N89°55'00"E 102.92' v W �, cP N89°55 00 E 100.00 �1 C 6 3 �' �� " 6' „ N89°55 00 E 100.80 C� (� W �` N89°55 00 E 100.80 "' C 3 7 �' '�' L� e ) // , N89°55 00 E 100.80 G W W N89 55 00 E 100.80 C 2 0 e f )) 1 V R � s , )) , N89 55 00 E 100.80 v N89 55 00 E 114.30 W `" c� N ? S74°26'26 "E R � � � �1 , » _ _ _ _ () ¢ N S82° 12 30 W(R) , „ � � � � / » S81 ° 15 49 E(R) I� cn ¢ S81 °05 49 W(R) , » , » S81 °05 49 W(R) S81 ° 15 49 E(R) 1� cn ¢ _ , » » S81 ° 15 49 E(R) S81 °05 49 W(R) N ¢ _ _ _ o S Z N � C� 10 P. U. E V p / co ZOO QN,�v V o0 _ _ _ _ L / N ZO QN V 00 _ _ _ _ O N cn -Z. �� C� Lo R 0 �o Q O `� 18 Ln O 0 10 P.U.E. �, V o� 25 O 0 10 P.U.E. - �"^� ^ 32 O `� 0 0 10 P.U.E. cs; O z o 39 O Cn O � `� O R 00 14 �Qy,a Z �o p� 21 0� � ago o 28 pp a), U�,a�o o 35 owl a`no 10,816SF �I� o UA 10, 249 SF C83 W = �' 10, 272 SF z 10, 282 SF �- W = h 10, 282 SF z 10, 282 SF '- Z = h 10, 282 SF z _ 10, 282 SF LU ``'Ln "E Q ^ 00 `- 129.80'Cl N89'55'00 / /) / _ '� N89°55 00 E 131.76 Lcc n �� ) » N89°55 00 E 131.76 c, (� o N89°55 00 E 131.76 o f N89°55 00 E 131.76 +� '"� N89°55 00 E 131.76 f , N89°55 00 E 131.76 ry J `- N89°55'00"E 147.10' �_ I� S79°29'49"W(R) LL-IJ ^ �81 °27'47"E(R) S81 °17'46"W(R) oZ o �' �S81 °27'47"E(R) jv-J� S81 °17'46"W(R) o �' �81 °27'47"E(R) NQ� S81 °17'46"W(R) �z o a �81 °47'06"E(R) CO N3 13 0_ o o �000 0 oC000 U o� pz o n p to p 19 0 20 co p 0 26 27 p p 33 �� 34 p� o w 40 0 W °p �. o �0 10, 771 SF ., �, O o o 0 20.50 z 12 373 SF 0 o "E = d z 0 0: ZLo Lr; 720 SF rn 12, 499 SF O 41 O z 0.50 0.50 ' " N28° 16 27 E R i) o p Lo `�' z o 41 O 12, 499 SF f 0.50 0.50 N28°26 28 W R 12, 720 SF JC4 i o `� Cr) �CD m 12, 499 SF o LoQ z 13,139 SF p _ , 10 P. U. E. N 10' P.U.E. z N89°55'00 C86 R 10' P. U. E. - - - _ ' m � � � -AUG-z `s8 � � � � 89°55'00" 121. 1 C 25' 119.02' 98.50' 108.50' 45.00' 45.00 59.75' C¢g 25.0 25.00 C46 59.75' 5.00' 45.00 108.50' 108.50' LOT AJA F O 1� S85°49'04"E(R) �� J t o �-- �, _ .3n� N 89°55'00" E 356.75' , C48 N 9'SSOQ nn --� - 307.00 �n E nn A A N 89°55'00" E 411.75' C41 LOT A �, -� - 0.82 ACRE 307.00 Lo N o PRNATE STREET �, a 12 �\ 10,539 SF N44°29'39 "E(R) olb N89°55'00"E 115.00' 11 15,094 SF '4 o � 2. O ^ WI � 'oo NI � 10 CN I o I 9,331 SF o zl 0 z o� Lo z ^ 9,200 SF z N ,89°55'00" E 921.00' C52 N89'S5'00"E C51 "FOUR SEASONS PLACE „PRIVATE STREET _ N 89°55 00 E 311.15 C53 C50 N 89°55 00 E 299.75 80.00' 80.00, 68.25' C51�50.0 74.25' 80.00' 80.00' 65.50' 9,200 SF z 9,200 SF z � c ` C54 10 P. U. E. - -2 O O o N I N �I I p 0 p 0 0 0 O L6 6 ���00I5 ��^ ILL o, 4 Lop �� 3 �p oLn 2 Ln oL6 1 ^ z 9,211 SF o "' o z 9, 201 SF z ^ 9, 200 SF z ^ 9, 200 SF z `- 10,197 SF Lop 9, 629 SF o o O O O I*- L9 - 52.00' 1 o ¢ G O 'Lon 00 ° o p o O v o z ^ o o p z O z _ 162.00' 85.00' 1 80.00' 1 80.00' 1 80.00' 1 80.00' z 80.00' z 80.00' 80.00' 80.00' 90.00, v 27.5 ' 27.50' S 89°55'00'" W- 1263. 1' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BROWN DEER PARK 1- - - - -7 - - - - 7 - - - - 1 - - - - -7 - - - - 7 - - - - 1 - - - - - - T - - - - - - - SHEET 2 FOR EASEMENT, MONUMENT AND SURVEYOR'S NOTES ( I J IVUJ ✓✓ VV L 1 ✓✓.V✓ G�� V 10' P.U.E. 1 'N 15°05'05 "W(R) LOT "FA STORM WATER DETENTION LOT 0.63 ACRE C78 211.10' 17 � N02g3 I TR ACT . /c n, 6, 4 M.B. O N 0 cN w 00 m I� to O 0.02' n W 0 N O ff 30' I Ln w co 0 0 m I 1 0.02' I 4 06117114 051107-amended F03 PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 1516 * LA QUINTA, CA 92247-1516 PHONE (760) 564-3858 * FAX (760) 564-2329 PGA WEST ATTACHMENT 5 June 12, 2014 Mr. Les Johnson City of La Quinta Community Development Director 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Monterra Dear Les, I've just spoken with Mr. Ladeda regarding the Monroe gate issue at the Monterra development in PGA WEST. He requested that I contact you to say that we have cleared up any outstanding issues and are comfortable with our previously stated position that an `exit only' gate would be acceptable to the PGA WEST Master Association. Mr. Ladeda has assured me that the gate will meet the standards and quality set forth by the Association and that he will work collaboratively with Mr. Pantanella, our Director of Community Services (Security) to ensure those standards are met. Please feel free to contact me if there are any remaining questions. 6�-` Moir Caldw ll, President RECEIVED PGA WES' Master Association JUN 16 2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E3FILE CON l Jay Wuu From: Caldwell Mary <mary.caldwellphd@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:00 AM To: Jay Wuu; Les Johnson Cc: McDonald Jerry; barbara.larsh@dc.rr.com; Jody Shapiro; Brill Deborah; royaziegler@gmail.com; Peters David Subject: Monterra project in PGA WEST Gentlemen, I am writing at the request of the PGA WEST Fairways Association and Mr. Shapiro to clarify the position of the PGA WEST Master Association regarding the addition of a gate from the Monterra development onto Monroe. The PGA WEST Master Association supports an `exit only' gate onto Monroe as long as it complies with standards to be set forth by the Master Association. My predecessor had requested a formal request for the gate from the Developers on which to base our decision. To the best of my knowledge, we did not receive it, so we took no further action. Sorry if there was some confusion. If you have questions, please feel free to email or call. Best Regards, Mary Caldwell, President PGA WEST Master Association 57419 Colonial La Quinta, CA 92253 760-396-9497 mamcaldwellhda mail.com City of La Quinta Planning Commission Regarding the Application to Amend Final Map 32742 by Monterra Properties June 3, 2014 I am unable to attend the public hearing on June 10, 2014 to discuss the subject above. I am a homeowner who will be significantly impacted by the potential additional traffic if the Monterra development proceeds and includes an access entrance on Brown Deer Park. My preference would be for any access/exit from the Monterra development to NOT include access/exit from Brown Deer Park as it will increase the traffic flow in front of my home. Part of the reason for purchasing this home was the quiet and lack of traffic on Turnberry Way. This benefit would be greatly reduced as a result of the requested relocation of access from Monroe Street to Brown Deer Park. However, if the access to the Monterra development must include access from Brown Deer Park as I have been told, than I would ask the Planning Commission to only approve this project if the exit from this development onto Monroe Street is also included. Thank you for your consideration. David L. Jahnke 55375 Turnberry Way La Quinta, CA RECEIVED JUN 0 92014 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAIRWAYS ASSOCIATION May 12, 2014 Les Johnson Planning Director City of La Quinta Planning Department P.O. Box 1504 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92244-1504 Dear Mr. Johnson, RECEIVED MAY 14 2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SFILE CCr"y The PGA WEST Fairways Association ("Fairways") Board of Directors and management staff met with the developers of the future Monterra development for the purpose of reviewing their proposed changes to the previously approved Tract Map, including the proposed closure of the Monroe entrance and access directly into the existing Norman Course community via Brown Deer Park. We appreciate the developers' plan to build approximately 40 homes and understand that Monterra will annex into the Fairways Association. The Fairways Board is in full support of the Monterra project. The Fairways community at PGA WEST is comprised of fourteen Special Benefit Areas each of which is represented by a homeowner District Delegate. At the quarterly District Delegate meeting on February 18 the Developer presented the Monterra project and asked for the support of the Delegates. As you can see by the attached minutes from that meeting, the Delegates were in unanimous support of the Monterra project. Please let us know if there is any other information you need regarding this matter. Sincerely, On Behalf of the Board of Directors PGA WEST Fairways Association 4�boraBrill President cc: PGA WEST Fairways Board of Directors Developer of Monterra Project Post Office Box 1690 • La Quinta, California 92247 • Phone (760) 776-5100 • Fax (760) 776-5111 'A WEST FAIRWAYS ASSOCIATION DISTRICT DELEGATE MEETING MINUTES DINING ROOM 3, THE PRIVATE CLUBHOUSE 3:OOPM, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014 Delegate Members Present (15) Donna Swanson, Eagle Bend Julie Leonard (Alternate), Heritage Walt Lloyd, La Cala Skip Hraban, Legends Jim Wisener, Masters Tom Lynch, Muirfield Carol Pearson, Norman Estates Rae Wheeler (Alternate), Norman Estates Sherrie Trbovich, Pasadera Thomas Raycraft (Alternate), Pasadera Bob Brown, Spanish Bay Jim Taylor (Alternate), Spanish Bay Penni Sturgill, Summit Jody Shapiro, Turnberry Steve Kiddoo (Alternate), Turnberry Also Present Deborah Brill, Fairways Board President Barbara Larsh, Fairways Board Vice President — Exited at 3:30pm David Park, Fairways Board Secretary Mark Ladeda, Monterra Developer — Exited at 3:30pm The Management Trust, Monarch Group Division Jodi Fischer, Division President Jerry McDonald, General Manager I. CALL TO ORDER — Deborah Brill called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M II. PRESENTATION OF MONTERRA DEVELOPMENT — Barbara Larsh shared the history of the Bonterra Development, now known as Monterra. Mark Ladeda, developer for Monterra, presented the renderings for the proposed residences and took questions from the Delegates. Jody Shapiro stated that he was in agreement with the project with the condition that there is an exit gate onto Monroe. Barbara Larsh replied that the exit gate is the responsibility of the PGA WEST Master Association and the City of La Quinta. Jerry McDonald asked everyone present if they were in favor of the project and everyone replied "yes". Jerry then asked if anyone was opposed to the project and if so, what the reasons are. No one opposed. III. QUEEN PALM TREE PROJECT — Jerry McDonald discussed the Queen Palm tree project currently in progress by the Landscape Committee. The Landscape Committee will develop a Draft Queen Palm Tree Removal Policy for the Board's review and approval. Jerry stated that only those trees identified as dead or dying would be removed but only after consulting with the landscape maintenance contractor and the homeowner first. IV. UPCOMING ANNUAL MEETINGS A. Delegate Districts — Deborah Brill stated that the Annual Meetings for the Delegate Districts are scheduled for March 17, 2014 from 3:OOpm-5:OOpm. Deborah also stated that Sharon Goldstein has resigned as the Hermitage SBA Delegate effective immediately, and she thanked her for her service to the Fairways Association. B. Fairways Membership — Deborah Brill stated the Annual Meeting for the Fairways Membership is scheduled for Thursday, April 10, 2014. PGA WEST Fairways Associa,_,ii District Delegate Meeting February 18, 2014 Page 2 of 2 V. OPEN FORUM A. Donna Swanson asked for a status on the trashcan discussion. Jerry McDonald responded that most of the Delegates were not in favor of Burrtec's automated service and the issue was tabled by the Board of Directors. B. Carol Pearson requested the Association to install two FIDO stations within the Norman Estates SBA. Deborah Brill replied that they would need to walk the area to find a suitable location for the FIDO stations and then ask the Board for approval. C. Penni Sturgill requested that the Association send only important news through Constant Contact email blasts to the homeowners and eliminate landscape report emails. Jerry McDonald asked all the Delegates if they agreed with Penni and all were in favor. They only want important news items sent through Constant Contact. VI. NEXT MEETING DATE — To be announced. VII. ADJOURNMENT — The meeting was adjourned at 4:19pm. a PGA WEST PGA WEST MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. PO. BOX 1516 — LA QUINTA, CA. 92247 —1516 PHONE (760) 564-3858 — FAX (760) 654-2329 October 5, 2013 Les Johnson Director Community Development Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Monterra Project — PGA WEST Dear Les: �rlq Cpo4.;; � This letter shall serve as notification to the City of La Quinta ("City") that the goal of the PGA WEST Master Association ("Association") is to include the 40 homes proposed for the Monterra development within the Norman Course area as part of the PGA WEST community. The Association considers the Monterra development a welcome and distinctive addition to PGA WEST and hopes the City will assist Mark Ladera in progressing through the development approval process. Very truly yours, Richard A. Hey s President, PGA WEST Master Association PLANNING COMMISSION PH 2 STAFF REPORT DATE: JUNE 24, 2014 CASE NUMBER: SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 2014-1787 APPLICANT: SWAIN SIGN INC. PROPERTY OWNER: EXTRA SPACE STORAGE, INC. REQUEST: SIGN PROGRAM FOR EXTRA SPACE STORAGE LOCATION: 46-600 ADAMS STREET RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Minute Motion approving Sign Permit Application 2014- 1787, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Extra Space Storage is proposing a sign program for permanent business identification signage (Attachment 1). As conditioned, the proposed signage complies with the development standards of the La Quinta Municipal Code. BACKGROUND In 1998 and 2001, the Planning Commission approved permanent business identification signage for Storage USA, a self -storage facility located on the northeast corner of Adams Street and Corporate Center Drive (Attachment 2). The approved signage currently consists of: Sign Type & Location Size Approved Size Installed (square feet) (square feet) Monument sign 39 33 (Adams Street) Building -mounted sign; channel letters 30 38 (Adams Street) Building -mounted sign; exposed raceway 50 50 (Corporate Center Drive) In May, 2014, Extra Space Storage gained ownership of Storage USA. Subsequently new business identification signs are proposed to reflect the new ownership. P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 2_EXTRA SPACE STORAGE\PH 2 (1) EXTRA SPACE PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 1 of 3 PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS: The applicant has applied for a sign program consisting of three signs: a replacement monument sign, and two replacement building -mounted signs (Attachment 3). The monument sign is proposed to be placed along Adams Street within the landscaped planter south of the primary entrance to the facility; the current location of the existing monument sign (Attachment 3, Sheet 2:1 1). The sign consists of an internally -illuminated aluminum cabinet and post. At its highest and widest dimensions, the monument sign is proposed to be approximately 8'-0" in height and 6'-9" wide, totaling approximately 34 square feet (including 13.50 square foot post) (Attachment 3, Sheet 3:1 1). The building -mounted sign proposed on the west -facing building elevation, "ExtraSpace Storage", consists of individual internally -illuminated channel letters (Attachment 3, Sheet 4:1 1). The total square footage of the sign is approximately 39 square feet. The building -mounted sign proposed on the south -facing elevation, "ExtraSpace Storage", consists of individual internally -illuminated channel letters affixed to an exposed raceway (Attachment 3, Sheet 8:1 1). The total square footage of the sign is approximately 24 square feet. The following chart shows a comparison of the proposed signs for Extra Space Storage to previously -approved and previously -installed signs for Storage USA: Sign Type & Location Approved Size Size Installed Proposed Size (sq. ft.) (square feet) (sq. ft.) Monument sign 39 33 34 (Adams Street) Building -mounted sign; channel letters 30 38 40 (Adams Street) Building -mounted sign; exposed raceway 50 50 24 (Corporate Center Drive) Staff concludes that the proposed sign program is acceptable. All replacement signs are appropriate for the subject locations as they are proportionate to the street frontage and building elevation, and are consistent with the signs currently approved or installed. The monument sign is smaller than what was originally approved, and similar in size to the existing monument. The west -facing building sign is larger than what was originally approved, but similar in size to the existing sign. With regards to the south -facing building sign, staff supports the size of the sign as it is smaller than what was originally approved and installed. Staff typically discourages the use of exposed raceways. However, as with the originally approved sign, the P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 2_EXTRA SPACE STORAGE\PH 2 (1) EXTRA SPACE PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 2 of 3 exposed raceway is required because the proposed sign location is a concrete wall with no parapet, and the space immediately behind the sign is part of a rented storage unit, which is locked and inaccessible during normal operating hours. As illustrated in the sign program, the raceway is to be painted to match the color of the supporting wall. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Community Development Department has determined that this project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15311 (Accessory Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act as it consists of the construction of on -premise signs. Report prepared by: Jay Wuu, Associate Planner Report approved for submission by: Les Johnson, Community Development Director Attachment: 1 . Project Information 2. Project Area Site Map 3. Extra Space Storage Sign Program P:\Reports - PC\2014\PC 6-24-14\PH 2_EXTRA SPACE STORAGE\PH 2 (1) EXTRA SPACE PC REPORT - final draft.docx Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Project Information CASE NUMBER: SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION 2014-1787 APPLICANT: SWAIN SIGN INC. PROPERTY OWNER: EXTRA SPACE STORAGE REQUEST: SIGN PROGRAM FOR EXTRA SPACE STORAGE LOCATION: 46-600 ADAMS STREET GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: COMMERCIAL PARK SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: FLOOD PLAIN STORM WATER CHANNEL SOUTH: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT EAST: COMMERCIAL PARK EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WEST: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OEM r, iT Aar—;"- z 44 RSa. 30* A 3U- PA Afts N 7 N,. ............ . . . . . . . . . . .A7 OEM_ 41011- NL VI Is all MOM Le - 0 - WAZ i� ►or, A. COyRP RATO-E ,CENTRE 11111,�IMII "WIT TT :501. �—,A 0 0� U6 4b � Z MAN- ---7- --A Extra Space Storage Project Area Site Map ATTAC S June 10, 2014 lo U5— ��� City of La u i nta Inc�R C-� Planning Division OF Community Development Departmen ExtraSpaceo Storage Houston Corporate Office Dallas Regional Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Houston, Texas 77007 Denton, TX 76205 713-977-7900 940-380-9153 Fax 713-977-7903 FAX:940-380-9395 Jurisdiction: City of La Quinta Zone: CP Commercial Park Code Wall Signs- 1 sf per lineal ft. of bldg. frontage along a street up to max of 50 sf aggregate, W 2 max allowed but only 1 per each side of bldg Freestanding Signs - NO pole signs allowed, only monument signs..25 sf per lineal ft. of street frontage up to max of 50 sf per sign and 100 sf. For ALL signs t• . ` ..r�'a•Y4M4 /4T'1 ■r I is ®© ■ fir s■ 4 ..ir..... .. •. �: 'fir Ccu' :is fig;,« i 012 T"Ific Count 010 T111Tk Count aos Traffic Count: iTraffic Count: ice. Informatlon iearest crow street to the count: orporate Center Or Direction from the count to the cross street: oath Distance to the nearest cross street: Ol mVles e K3i Fuel3 12.631(Current Year Estimatel 13,714 (Average Dolly Tmthc( 13.738 (Average D'ailyTral 14.174 (Average MlyTral 012 Traffic Count 010 Traffic Count 009 Traffic Count 009 Traffic Count re mf rmaton iearest i street to the count: crporate Center Or Ilrectian from the Count tothe [.toss street: larch itsta— to the nearest am street: .01 miles nurse.- K55 Fuels 9,847 (Current Year Estimate) 9.282 (AueraBe Oaily Traffic] 9,058 (Average Daily Traffic) 9,363 (Average Daily Trafficf US i 111 2012 Traffic Count: 30,834 (Current Year E. tirl 2010 Traffic Count: 31,348 (Average Daily Traff,,, 2009 Traffic Count: 31,528 (Average Do;b, Tr, f+..' Site latonnation Nearest Crass Street to the Count: Auto Center Way 5 Direction from the Count to the crass street; west Distance to the nearest crass street: 0.07 miles Source: KS5 Fuels N S E C u f EDM Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 s • f will, , Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. Us1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 a os u`rmE ... nxonaos Ell 1 :11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. ELEVATION 1 SCOPE OF WORK: EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN, MANUFACTURE & INSTALL NEW MONUMENT SIGN Existing Proposed �0 33.3 19.86 - z il 011194111911 w a z M 0 z �F +ExtraSpace' � � �•o s r Storage 888-STORAGE Z - z 0 z z C'S 0 x H llpm— Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 •1 Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. US1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 A aS u`LME ... neonaos 2:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or orb ors may deem valuable. �o Scale:'/z" = V-0" s c N je-WaS1-111 I extraspace.com - • 17 3/8" T81/2rr F4" EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CABINET PAINTED 5.74 = GREEN FOR UPPER BLUE FOR LOWER SF © EXTRUDED ALUMINUM RETAINER SYSTEM PAINTED TO MATCH CABINET © ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED GREEN 0 WHITE LEXAN FACE WITH APPLIED VINYL GRAPHICS (SEE SCHEDULE) (port © CLIENT APPROVED USLED T2 TANDEM LIGHTING SYSTEM: STRUCTURE SUPPORT BRACKET W/WIREWAY Q ELECTRONIC POWER SUPPLY TAN PMS #467C # GALLON ®PMS BLACK #2500-022 WHITE CALON PMS #7463C #2500-036 PMS #349C #2500-3425 CALON CALON a� ml EE zl 3 3 i c a a e® Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX: 940-3 80-9395 was Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. US1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 a a uta .. aaMar ELEI;11'C SIGN 3:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. ELEVATION 2 SCOPE OF WORK: EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING CHANNEL LETTERS, -_- ®© Existing Proposed 38 39.05 z 0 PROPOSED a z I- 0 x 0 4 x a w Storage H H it 0 v � a 0 = o m z 0 z z C'3 0 x H IHM Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 •1 • Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. L!0200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 4:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. Id 20'-51/2" (20.45) ra 0 9 Ext Sp c Stora e. .1 �s 0 5"FABRICATED ALUMINUM LETTER RETURNS PAINTED BLUE PAINT INTERIOR WITH LIGHT ENHANCING PAINT © 1"TRIM CAP GREEN ON GREEN FACED LETTERS BLACK ON BLACK FACED LETTERS © NON -CORROSIVE INSTALLATION HARDWARE: SEE DETAIL 0 3/16" THICK PLEX/POLYCARBONATE FACE WHITE WITH 1ST SURFACE TRANSLUCENT & BLACK PERFORATED VINYL AS SHOWN © USLED DIODE MODULE WHITE 0 FLAT ALUMINUM BACK WELDED TO RETURNS Q 'A" WEEP HOLES (2) TWO PER LETTER GROUNDED WALL PASS-THRU SEALED WATER TIGHT LOW VOLTAGE ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMER LOCATED IN INTERIOR WALL AREA INSIDE A PROTECTIVE CASE BOX ml WATERPROOF FLEXIBLE CONDUIT FOR WIRING z • 1 ■ • 101' 11 m Thru-Bolt Mounting w PMS#467C #2500-05 o TAN CALON METAL ANGLE IRON STUD ON BACKSme PMS#7463C #2500-036 0 ® _ aywau CALON #2500-3425 PMS #349C CALON = Hanger Boltso WHITE a a WOOD PMS BLACK #2500-022 ® CALON STUD a NOTESMANUFACTURING Reverse ToggleBolt Mounting. 0 CHANNEL LETTERS UP TO 42" TALL WILL BE tz CONSTRUCTED USING .040 ALUMINUM RETURNS & .063 ALUMINUM BACKS CHANNEL LETTERS LARGER THAN 42" TALL z WILL BE CONSTRUCTED USING .063 ALUMINUM w 1 I I 1 RETURNS & .090 ALUMINUM BACKS CHANNEL LETTERS 48" TALL LARGER w WILL BE CONSTRUCTED USING 2" TRIMCAP C'3 0 s H e® DallasHouston Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 •1 Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. US1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 5:11 The purchaser agrees to held the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. ■ • SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE EXISTING CHANNEL LETTERS, MANUFACTURE & INSTALL NEW CHANNEL LETTERS 1 I I' 1 Existing Proposed 49 24 EXISTING z co m —^ o a z a � �© OPTION B PROPOSED a ¢ z z m � z w 0 o H _ 0 z 0 _ o 0 o tz m z z w 0 z z C'3 0 _ Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 .f Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. Us1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 A.c 8:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or orb ors may deem valuable. �© OPTION B lei 111111"[dal B A B SFEETE AMPS NU BER OF POWERSUPPLIES 1'-6" 15-11 %"1 24.00 1 1.26 2 m� r a z m NON -CORROSIVE INSTALLATION HARDWARE: Thru-Bolt MountingTAN PMS #467C #2500-05CALON o SEE DETAIL METAL nhcLEIRON STRINGER ©STUD ONO CKSIDE _ #2500-036 0 5" FABRICATED ALUMINUM LETTER RETURNS DE wnu PMS #7463C t— PAINTED BLUE � � c,�oaaq CALON PAINT INTERIOR WITH LIGHT ENHANCING PAINT PMS #3asc #2500-3425 ©CALON i 1" TRIM CAP GREEN ON GREEN FACED LETTERS _BoltsWHITE a BLACK ON BLACK FACED LETTERS 0 a FLAT ALUMINUM BACK WELDED TO RETURNS \ j WOOD ® PMS BLACK #2500-022 a © Y4" THICK METAL FLAT BAR FOR STUD CALON C) A SECURE INSTALLATION a a IlguuaNt9MSYaCl6 a USLED DIODE MODULE WHITE o MANUFACTURING NOTES 3/16" THICK PLEX/POLYCARBONATE FACE Reverse WHITE WITH 1ST SURFACE Toggle Bolt o i�� TRANSLUCENT & BLACK PERFORATED CHANNEL LETTERS UP TO 42" TALL WILL BE VINYL AS SHOWN CONSTRUCTED USING .040 ALUMINUM RETURNS Q LOW VOLTAGE ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMER & .063 ALUMINUM BACKS „ MOUNTED IN A 71/4" X 7 t/4" EXTRUDED .050 " CHANNEL LETTERS LARGER THAN 42TALL ALUM. RACEWAY SUPPORT/WIRING BOX I � w PAINTED WILL BE CONSTRUCTED USING .063 ALUMINUM I l a l I i RETURNS & .090 ALUMINUM BACKS z VISIBLE CUT-OFF SWITCH WITH FLIP -UP COVER w CHANNEL LETTERS 48" TALL LARGER ml 'A" WEEP HOLES 2 TWO PER LETTER I + . - z O � � WILL BE CONSTRUCTED USING 2" TRIMCAP a m GROUNDED WALL S-THRU SEALED WATER TIGHTo �I H e® Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 1 • •1 • Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. Us1200136-1114 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 9:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. ELEVATION • I SCOPE OF WORK: MANUFACTURE & INSTALL NEW OFFICE SIGN z z PROPOSED EXISTING a w x Stp u S[1.1 SI aRAr - O H Q N O z Office. o z - o H x 0 0 z z C'S 0 x H llpm Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 • •1 Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: B.OSBORN Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. US1200136-R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 10:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable. e® Houston Dallas Houston Corporate Office 5225 Katy Freeway, Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77007 713-977-7900 Fax 713-977-7903 Dallas Regional Office 2220 San Jacinto Blvd. Suite 365 Denton, Texas 76205 940-380-9153 FAX:940-380-9395 c •1 • • Address: #1561 46600 Adams St. City: La Quinta State: CA 92253 Account Rep: UNION Sales Rep: M.J.DeNARDO APPROVALS CLIENT DESIGN PROD. Designer: Shana Beard PCR4 Design No. US1200136 R4 DATE 10-15-13 Rev. Date: 6-18-14 Dsu`r u 11:11 The purchaser agrees to hold the seller harmless against any cause for action for damage which may occur as a result of drilling for piers and foundations, including but not limited to sewer, gas lines or any underground obstacles which the purchaser or others may deem valuable.