001722 (SFD)T4.hf 4 4 Q"
P.O. BOX 1504
Building 78-105 CALLE ESTADO
Address 51`M E.senbovex Dr. LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253
Aq=Un Pw
Mailing
Address 51-754 hVmida 't alle.rg
CityZip
ta C)n1ritil9M3 1
Contractor
Zip Tela
State Lic. I City
& Classif. Lic. #
Arch., Engr.,
Designer
Address I Tel.
City Zip State
Lic. #
_y LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION .
I herebyaffirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section
7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and
effect.
SIGNATURE DATE
OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following
reason: (Sec. 7031.5,Susiness and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a
permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also
requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to
Me provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of
Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that. he is exempt therefrom, and the basis
for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by 'any applicant for a permit
'subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). -
❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees,with wages as their sole compensation, will
do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Buisness and
Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who
builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees,
provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building
or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden
of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.),
❑ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to con-
struct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law
does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for
such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law.)
❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason
r
Date Owner `� �� "♦s '
w -
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of
Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.)
Policy No. . Company
O Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished.
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM
WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
(This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation
or less.)
I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not
employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation
Laws of California.
Date Owner
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become
subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith
comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked.
CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the
work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.)
Lender's Name
Lender's Address
This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to
expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days.
I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct.
I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws 'relating to building
construction, and hereby authorize representatives -of this city to enter the above-
mentioned property for inspection purposes.
Signature of applicant t% ' i + r —t •. L Date
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip
HARD COPY
No. 001722
BUILDING: TYPE CONST. Td OCC. GRP. R 3
A.P. Number 773-175-006
Legal Description icyt: 1
Project Description Ria+ri le fmtt lv x11.3.xtct
ZONE:
BY:
Minimum Setback Distances:
Front Setback from Center Line
Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line
Side Street Setback from Center Line
iX 1310
Sq. Ft.No.
Size -
Stories
No. Dw.
Units
New R1 Add ❑
Alter ❑
Repair ❑ Demolition ❑
941'85
Issued by:
Date Permit
r
Validated by:
( t �
Estimated Valuation
�! /� y�� }�/►
!, q0 l i .00
PERMIT
AMOUNT
Plari Chk. Dep.
250.00
Plan Chk. Bal.
49.38
Const.
349.00
Mech.
2Q„Q0
Electrical
AR.34
Plumbing
01.00
S.M.I.
5.04
Grading
Driveway Enc.
20.00
Infrastructure
11051.68
TOTAL
1,922.44
1.672.44
REMARKS
ZONE:
BY:
Minimum Setback Distances:
Front Setback from Center Line
Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line
Side Street Setback from Center Line
Side Setback from Property Line
FINAL DATE
INSPECTOR
941'85
Issued by:
Date Permit
r
Validated by:
( t �
Validation:
A3014 .1 U 1 29 16%244 CK
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
NO. ELECTRICAL FEES
NO. PLUMBING FEES
IST FL. SQ. FT. ® $
UNITS
SLAB GRADE
ROUGH PLUMB.
BONDING
YARD SPKLR SYSTEM
2ND FL. SQ. FT.
OV
FORMSR511p
,SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK
ROUGH WIRING/ 6 6 -r
MOBILEHOME SVC.
BAR SINK
POR. SO. FT. ®
GAS (ROUGH)
METER LOOP
GAR. SO. FT. ®
POWER OUTLET
ROOF DRAINS
GAS (FINAL)
TEMP. POLE
DRAINAGE PIPING
CAR P. Q. FT. ®
GROUT
WATER HEATER
WALL SQ. FT.
FINAL INSP.
DRINKING FOUNTAIN
SQ FT ®
WATER SYSTEM
URINAL
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION $
=$
WATER PIPING
NOTE: Not to be used as property tax valuation
FINAL INSP.
FLOOR DRAIN
MECHANICAL FEES
WATER SOFTENER
VENT SYSTEM FAN EVAP.COOL HOOD
SIGN
WASH ER(AUTO)(DISH)
APPLIANCE DRYER
GARBAGE DISPOSAL
FURNACE UNIT WALL FLOOR SUSPENDED
LAUNDRY TRAY
AIR HANDLING UNIT CFM
KITCHEN SINK
ABSORPTION SYSTEM. B.T.U.
TEMP USE PERMIT SVC
WATER CLOSET
COMPRESSOR HP
POLE,TEMIPERM
LAVATORY
HEATING SYSTEM FORCED GRAVITY
AMPERES SERV ENT
SHOWER
BOILER B.T.U.
SQ. FT. ® c
BATH TUB
SQ. FT. ® c
WATER HEATER
MAX. HEATER OUTPUT, B.T.U.
SQ. FT. RESID ® 1 Va c
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SO.FT.GAR ® 3/ac
HOUSE SEWER
FINISH GRADING
GAS PIPING
PERMIT FEE
PERMIT FEE
PERMIT FEE
DBL
TOTAL FEES
MICRO FEE
MECH.FEE PL.CK.FEE
CONST. FEE ELECT. FEE
SMI FEE PLUMB. FEE
STRUCTURE PLUMBING ELECTRICAL HEATING & AIR COND. SOLAR
SETBACK
1,4GROUND PLUMBING
UNDERGROUND
A.C. UNIT
COLL. AREA
SLAB GRADE
ROUGH PLUMB.
BONDING
HEATING (ROUGH)
STORAGE TANK
OV
FORMSR511p
,SEWER OR SEPTIC TANK
ROUGH WIRING/ 6 6 -r
DUCT WORK
ROCK STORAGE
FOU46. REINF. r�9. L�
7
GAS (ROUGH)
METER LOOP
HEATING (FINAL)
OTHER APP./EQUIP.
REINF. STEEL
GAS (FINAL)
TEMP. POLE
GROUT
WATER HEATER
SERVICE
FINAL INSP.
BOND BEAM
WATER SYSTEM
GRADING
CU. yd.
$ plus x$
=$
LUMBER GR.
FINAL INSP.
FRAMING 1 6
FINAL INSP,
ROOFING ��
VENTILATION
(D
!+ •'•"—/i�J/
REMARKS:
FIRE ZONE ROOFING
FIREPLACE
SPARK ARRESTOR
GAR. FIREWALL
LATHING
MESH
Q
INSULATION/SOUND
FINISH GRADING
FINAL INSPECTION
CERT. OCC.
FENCE FINAL
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURES/INITIALS.
GARDEN WALL FINAL
.,%FIEp
S
= 0 Desert Sands Unified School District
H BERMUDA DUNES r
RANCHO MIRAGE 82.879 HIGHWAY 111 i INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201-5678 • (619) 347-8631
INDIAN WELLS H
PALM DESERT ~
s�O LAOUINTA '
INDIO a October 29, 1985
y�
City of La Quinta
Department of Community Development
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, CA 92253
Re: 51860 Eisenhower, La Quinta
Gentlemen: -
The developer of the above referenced lot
has mitigated its impacts on our overcrowded schools by payment
of the amount of $628 per unit to be applied to the cost of
district educational faci'l i:ties made necessary 'by such new
development.
Sincerely,
Yl �.
John D. Brooks
Assistant Superintendent
Business Services
JDB/crm
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
Applicant: Submit this form with three copies of a scaled plot plan drawn to county specifications required on the
attached check list. A non refundable filing fee of $15 is required when the application is submitted. Check must be
made payable to County of Riverside.
Name
Mailing Address
10rd
62-- a2�_ dos lS dLt-A� -�• -Z,
City State
Zip Code
Phone
'Property Address Ity or
'Legal Descri tion of Property (Lot, Parcel Map, Tract
c �t� t� -1
51- 8 ho �� EL. -Aa s Q- �,.� 0 -Ms
:—-: �Q T v e�� Lti 0
'Assessors Parcel No. Water Serving Property From
Lot size
SO.
u IC p`
1 '
Signature of Applicant Date
'The above information must be verified from Building Application
Staff Use — Do Not Write Below This Line
Initial Date
WQCB Clearance required Yes ❑ No ��:rP 3' �1 S
Soils feasibility report required Yes 'El No
Detailed boring report required Yes ❑ No
Detailed contour plot required Yes ❑ No
Comments:
by
Soils or boring report
Approved bya e
f
Soils Map Page Soil Type Tract File No.7,�n 4COZNI,6Other
Number of Bedrooms
Septic Tank Size (gallons)
Rate ulre
3115 / , •+fes
1
{ 0 OL G4 LF
/. S
New Addition Replacement
❑ ❑
Leach line sq. it. of bottom area trench
Leach bed (sq. tt. of bo om arei bed)
Se;?�ePit Diameter
Number of Pits
Seepage Pit Depth=.
Total Depth of Pit"c„
61
1
�1(01
Location of System
W11Ae.7V -6� 14Cy�cX-
Aj4 N
Addition.aI RQ, uirem. �� i11AJNZ"AJiN *3fbl FSL ` j'/oN
II u
/aD�
Yr14J,2;t— LA- A`o*I '4r -
A permit 'isrove dopieclJorthe design of a subsurface disposal system as ind' ated on the accompd ie - p a
using the requirements set forth in Section B,abov#
e. A �lilding permit is necessary for the installation of the above
designed system. ,/ .
IZW�-(ZV 4 -
0,-,/
Signature Health official Date
of
Receipt No.
District: Riverside ❑ Indio F Hemet ❑
Issued By
Date
r
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - Office File YELLOW - Applicant PINK - Building Dept. GOLDENROD - Pending File
W.
Pr000sed SFD for �� '`' P�'Z- MICHEAL PALMER AND ASSOCIATES
Santa Carealita Z.vO =vt, HAS2�A Qnz
Valle La Guinta 3778 Sherman Street
LOT R San Diego, California
Page 1 of 9 (6193 464-1500
6 E N E R A L DATA
Date
6
1 3 / 85
Climate Ione
15
Job N
33M
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DESIGN
Location Code
162
COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE
Elevation
475
REOUI+IE�T F C. ^24
Degrees North
33.8
Heating Degree Days
1^23,2
_— -- _ --- -�_--
T ow
32
STATE LIC 333868
T os
109
T Jan
53
AREA DATA
First Floor Slab Area
1310
Square Feet
Insulated Slab Perimeter and R-Value (see R12 sht.3)
42
R- 7
Uninsulated Slab Perimeter
104
Lineal Feet
First Floor Raised Area and Insul. R-Value
0
R- 8
Second Floor Area Over Conditioned Space
0
Square Feet
Second Floor Area Over Unconditioned Space b R Value
0
R- 0
Total Floor Area
1310
Square Feet
NORTH ORIENTATION DATA
Gross Wall Area and R-Value of Wail Insulation
262
R- 11
Shading Coefficient Required
none
req'd
Total North Glazing Area and Blazing U-Coefficient
45.6
L- .65
% of North Glazing to Floor Area
3.4
-%
SOUTH ORIENTATION DATA
Gross Wall Area and R -Value of Insulation 262 R- 11
Shading Coefficient Required none req'd
Total South Glazing Area and Glazing U -Coefficient 18.0 U- .65
% of South Glazing to Floor Area 1.4 %
EAST ORIENTATION DATA
Gross Wall Area and R -Value of Insulation 320 R- 11
Shading Coefficient Required none req'd
Total East Glazing Area and Glazing U -Coefficient 67.0 U- .65
% of East 6lazina to Floor Area 5.1 %
WEST ORIENTATION DATA
Gross Wall Area and R -Value of Insulation 320 R- 11
Shading Coefficient Required none req'd
Total West Glazing Area and Glazing U -Coefficient 24.0 U- .65
% of West 61azina to Floor Area 1.8 i
1 =i
MICHEAL PALMER AND ASSOCIATES
Title 24 Compliance Analysis
3770 Sherman Street
San Dieao, California 92118, 16191 464-1560
Page 2 of 9
CEILING b R 0 0 F ASSEMBLY DATA
i
•
.. Gross Ceiling/Roof Area and Insulation R -Value
1310
R- 38
Secondary Ceiling/Roof Area and Insulation R -Value
0
R- 0
Total Skylight Area and Blazing LF -Coefficient
0
U- 1.1
% Skylight Area to Floor Area
0
%
.
Roof Dverhana South Side (inches)
24
inches
THERMAL MASS DATA
Exposed Slab/Tile Area
151
sq. ft.
37.5 sq.ft. M. Bath
Exposed Masonry Thermal Mass
0 sq. ft.
37.5 sq.ft. Bath # 2
48 sq.ft. Kitchen
28 sq.ft. Entry
SPACE HEATING SYSTEM
Seasonal Efficiency of Gas Furnace (71%xin)
71
i
Refriaeration SEER (8.0 min)
9.5
Heat Puma Energy Efficiency Ratio
0
WATER H E A T I N 6 DATA
Gas Water Heating
Minimum R -Value of Water Beater Insulation
R-12
Minimum R -Value of Piping Insulation (1st 60")
R-3
MOVABLE INSULATION
% of Movable Insulation (4.9 or 11.1 %)
Minimum Area Of Insulatin§ Drapes.Required
0
fV2 .
DUCT INSULATION
2.68
(R)
(As per Uniform Mechanical Code 1976)
[END)
MICHEAL PALMER
DATE:
6
Title 24 Compliar:..a
3770 Sherman Street
AB 163 (GOG6IN)
COMPARISON
ANALYSIS
CLIMATE ZONE
t5
+ San` Diego, CA
Page 3 of 9
Job 4 33202
SAN DIEGO. CA.62.ESOL
S6D MPAS V3.6
`
i MEASURE
PRELIMINARY
AVERAGING
I THIS 1
1
VALUE
CALCULATIONS
I DESIGN 1
TOTAL F L 0 0 R AREA
1 1310
ft^2
t 1
SLAB FOUNDATION
t
1 I
' Insulated Slab Perimeter
I 42
In. ft
8
Insulated
0 x
42
I I
Uninsulated Slab Perimeter
1 104
In. ft
-4
Slab
-----
0.0
t ••1
Total Slab Area
1 1310
ft^2
Value
146
1 t
* Slab Insulation R -Value
I
1 7
Uninsulated -4 x
164
1
I t
Depth of Insulation
I
Slab
----
_
-2.8
1 1
+ See pg. 4 3 item #
i R- 18
inches
Value
146'
1 i
of this analysis
I
I
sub -total=
-2.8
1 1
i
Net
-2.8 x
1310
1 I
t 1
t
Slab
=
-2.8
1 1
RAISED FOUNDATION
I
Value
1310
1 1
Raised Fdn. Fl. Area
1 8
ft^2
1 i
' R -Value of Fl. Insulation
I R- 0
a
Raised
0 x
8
I I
I
Fdn.
=
8.8
t 1
1
Value
1318
I I.
f
TOTAL--)
-2.8
1 -3.0 1
CEILING/ROOF ASSEMBLY
I
FLOOR
I 1
Area of Roof Assembly
1 1310
ftA22
1 {
{ R- 38.0
-2.0
TOTAL
) 1 -2.0 1
1
ROOF
1 -1
NORTH WALL ASSEMBLY
I
i
t I
I 1
Area of North Wall Assembly
I 262
ft^2
1 1
R -Value of Insulation
I R- 11
-6
North Wall
-6 x
262
I I
1
=
-1.4
1 1
SOUTH WALL ASSEMBLY
t
1164
1
Area of South Wall Assembly
I 262
ft^2
t 1
R -Value of Insulation
i R- 11
..-6
South Wall
-6 x
262
I 1
EAST WALL ASSEMBLY
1
1164
1 1 .
Area of East Wall Assembly
1 320
ft^2
t 1
R -Value of Wall Insulation
I R- 11
-6
East Wall
-6 x
32a
1 I
WEST WALL ASSEMBLY
1
1164
) 1
Area of West Wall Assembly
1 320
ft^2
1 1
R -Value of Wall Insulation
i R- 11
-6
West Wall
-6 x
3220
I 1
1
_
-1.6
1 1
1
i
1164
1 i
i
•
1
TOTAL---)
-6.0
1
1 -6.0 1
i
WALL
I 1
NORTH ORIENTATED GLAZING
i
1 t
Glazing Area
1 45.0
ft^2
I 1
f Glazing to Fl. Area
1 3.4
%
I t
"U" of Glazing
1 .65
8
{ NORTH GLAZING VALUE I
) I a I
SOUTH ORIENTATED GLAZING
1
1
I 1
i t
Glazing Area
1 18.8
ft^2
1 1
% 61azina of Fl. Area
1 1.4
%
I t
"U" of Glazing
1 .65
8
{ SOUTH GLAZING VALUE I
) i a I
SUB -TOTAL THIS PAGE
'
) 1 -11.8 t
I 1
AB 163 COMPARISON ANALYSIS
Page 4 of 9
I
MEASURE
VALUE
1 THIS 1
EAST ORIENTATED GLAZING I
1 DESIGN t
Glazing Area 1
67.8
ft12
i I
�C Glazing to Fl. Area 1
5.1
><
I I
°U' of Glazing 1
.65
-4.8
:I EAST GLAZING VALUE l
-)
1 -4.0 I
1
BEST ORIENTATED GLAZING I
1 i
I I
Glazing Area 1
24.6
W2
I 1
% Glazing of Fl. Area 1
1.8
%
1 I'
°U• of Glazing 1
1
.65
6.0
1: WEST GLAZING VALUE 1
>
1 6.0 I
1 I
I
SKYLIGHT ASSEMBLY GLAZING 1
1 1
4 1
Total Area 1
8
ft"2
1 I
X Glazinq to Fl. Area I
8
X
1 I
"U• of Glazing 1
i
I
1.10
8
1 SKYLIGHT VALUE 1-
)
1 8 I
i t
1 i
t
1
!
% Fl..
SC
SC of SC of
t i
i •1
i 1
t
Area
of
Device Device
Net
I t
1
Glazing
#1 #2
Sc
I I
t
SHADING COEFFICIENT I
East
5.1
.29 'x
1.8 x 1•
.29
I i
1E -3.0 I
South
1.4
.29 x
1.0 x 1
-.29
is 8 I
I
West
1.8
.29 x
1.0 x 1
.29
1w -1.0 i
I
Skylight.
0
1.00. x
1.0 x 1
e
I 8 1
1
HORIZONTAL SOUTH OVERHANG i
1 i
I
% South Glaze/Fl. Area .t
1.4
x
! 1
Length 1
24
inches
i 4
Value
MOVABLE INSULATION I
I {
% of III to Fl. Area I
8
f
DRAPES OF
R-5 VALUE
I 1
Sq. Ft. Required I
®
ft^2-)
0
)
I 8 I
INTILTRATION CONTROL I
{ {
Standard Control I
)
0
>
I 8 I
Tight Control I
)
n/a
i I
• 1
GAS FURNACE DATA 1
I t
i 1
(I =yes, 0=no) I
1
I 1
(Seasonal Efficiency 1
71
%
0
)
I 8 1
Win. 7%) 1
-
I 1
1
HEAT PUMP DATA Qmyes, 0 --no) 1
.0
1
1 1
Energy Efficiency Ratio I
0
)
8
1
COOLING DRTAQ=cooled, @=no) I
1
t 1
I {
Refrigeration (SEER) 1
9.5
1 1
Seasonal Efficiency 1
71
)
12
)
i 12.0 t
ACTIVE SOLAR SPACE HEATING I
I l
(w/ gas back-up) 1
1 I
Net Solar Fraction 1
0
%---)
0
)
1 8 I
SUR TOTAL THIS PAGE
)
i -1.0 1
Page 5 of 9
V
siiiiiZiilr�iZ
i THIS !
SOLAR WATER HEATING
i DESIGN 1
(with gas back-up)
I i
Net Solar Fraction
Floor Area
1318
ft' 2
Water Heating System
22
I i
I 1
(22=gas,33=elect,44--H.P.)
8
i !
I
Specific
Density
Thickness
Heat R
Plass
I i .
1 t
i i
Heat
in
Caps- . hr-ft^2
Capa-
I i
lb/ft^3
Feet
city F/Btu/ft
city
1 1
1 I
4" Brick .19
133.8
.33
8.15 .8
6.3
1 1
4" Slab w/Tile .22
148.88
.33
8.81 ,7
6.9
1 1
1.5" Liqhtwt. Conc. .28
122.88
.28
6.83 .7
4.2
1 1
i
Exposed
Plass
I I
1 i
Mass
Capacity
1 1
Hard Surface Flooring o/ Slab
..151
x
6.9
...Net. Mass Capacity
= 1842
1 1
. •Exposed Masonry
8
x
'6, 3
= Net Plass Capacity
= 8
1 1*
8
x
8
Net Mass Capacity
= 8
1 1
8
x
6
Net Mass Capacity
= 8
1 1'
8
x
8
Net Mass Capacity
= 8
1 1 .'
8
x
8_
Net Mass Capacity
= 8
i I.
.0
x
®
= Net Mass Capacity
= 8
i I
8
x
8
= Net Mass Capacity
= 8
1 t
TOTAL
) 1842
1 I
I
.
1842
i 1
I t .
M A S S V A L U E O F T H
I S D E
S I G N
8.88 (DESIGN MASS
CAPACITY)
I 1
1318
i 't
1 I •
1 1
t I
DESIGN THELIAC PLASS
>
i 1
I 1
I 1
1 6.8 1
NET QTS OF THIS ANALYSIS-----)
1 5.8 1
1
AB
163 POINT
VALUE C.E.C. PUBLICATION: P 400-84-88 1 =
STORY BUILDING
1
1 t
1 I
SLAB FLOOR=1 RAISED FLOORS
FLOOR VALUE=
1' POINT
>
1 -4.8 1
i i
TITLE 24 California t,:.. •, HOURLY AND ANNUAL BUILDING
RESOURCE:part 4 C-48 ECH 1-16 HEAT GAIN AND LOSS
Job Number: # 33203
Total
Floor Area:
1318 ft -2
Climate Zone: L5
Page 6 of 9
SAN DIE60.CA.62.ESOL
Date:
6 /
3
/ 85
SITE INFORMATION
i CONDUCTIVE HEAT GAIN
Heating Degree Day ............................
HDD =
1232
o F -day
I
Outside Design Temperature ....................
Tow
32
o F
I Cooling DB o F
Outside January Mean Temperature ..............
TJan =
53
o F
I Outside Design Temperature....
97 o F
Elevation .....................................
=
475
feet
I Inside Design Temperature.....
78 o F
Degrees North Latitude ........................
=
33.8
Deg.
I
I
Area
Factor
Sens
DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE
I
ft ^2
Btu/hr
All Assemblies (except below) 70 o
F - 32
- ^Th =
38
o F
I
Insulated Fl. o/ Vented Unheated Space
= ^Thi =
19
o F
I GLAZING
Uninsulated Fl. o/ Vented Unheated
Space
= ^Thu =
14
o F
1 North
45 x
32
= 1,448
Slab -on Ground Floors 70 o
F - 17
= ^Ths =
53
o F
1 South
1B x
40
= 728
I East
67 x
62
= 4,154
CONDUCTIVE HEAT LOSS
I West
24 x
62
= 1,488
Area
Ave. U
Design
hourly
i
I
ft .^2
of
Temp. Dif,
ht .loss
I
Assembly
^Th
q
i Net Walls
1164 x
3.5
= .4,074
-
I
R=
it
t
—
I
^T
Btu/hr
I
1
1 -Ceiling or Roof
1318 x
.0.6
= 799
Ceil/Roof Assembly 1 1310 x
0.034 x
38
=
1707
1
R=
38
Secondary Assembly I 0 x
0 x
38
0
t
t
_..I..:
People
3 x
300
98
Slab perimeter 1 146. x
0.390 x
53
=
3007
I, Cooking
(Per ANSI)
1,28Q
Raised Floor I. 0 x
1.M x
14
=
8
i
1
i "SUBTOTAL
) 14,851-
4,851-
NORTH
NORTH ORIENTATION I
1
Wall Assembly 1 262 x
M% x
38
=
8%
1, Duct Heat Gain
) 2,22
glazing 1 45 , x
8.650 x
38
=
1112
I Latent Heat gain
1
SOUTH ORIENTATION t
1
l.` SUKOTAL
) 21,54'
Wall Assembly 1 262 x
0.8% . x
38
=
896.
I. ..
Glazing 118 x
0.650 x
38
445
1 HEAT GAIN GRAND TOTAL Btu/hr
I
)
EAST ORIENTATION 1
1
Wall Assembly 1 320 x
L@% x
38
=
10%
1 (Swing Factor of 1.(1)
35,89
Glazing 1 67 x
0.650 x
38
=
1655
1
TEST ORIENTATION I
1
Wall Assembly 1 320 x
0.090 x
38
=
10% "'1:
blazing. 1 24 x
0.650 x
38
=
593
1 DESIGN BLAZING A A
15
!
-
I BASIC GLAZING AREA-
) 17
Skylights I a x
8
38
I
SUBTOTAL 1
12499
t
1
1
)
1
INFILTRATION (Using a I
I
ceiling height of %") 1. 1310 x
L018 x
38
7168
1
1
DUCT HEAT LOSS 1
)
•i
2950
1
1
1
TOTAL HOURLY HEAT
LOSS
Btu/hr
22617
1
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MET CAPACITY
(when applicable)
29402
1
a ..
CODE: R31
H E A T T R A N S F E R C 0 E F F I C I. E N T
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY
DESIGN ASSOCIATES
3770 Sherman Street
San Diego, CA [619] 464-1500
CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY
LIST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS
R
I
I I I i][]13II .
1 I 1 [1[3[311(—#1
1 1.
0.5' Gypsum Board
8.45
1 1 10 [] 11(-#211
1 2.
3.5' Mineral Fiber Insulation
11.80
1 I IEll] 13 11
1
I I 1 [][]I] 11
1 3..
Building Paper
0.06
I 1 1(-#3[] 13 [] I I
I
I 1 1 [30011
I 4.
Wire Reinforced.Stucco
0.18
1 #4 H 1 131113 11
1
I i 1000 11
I
I 11000 11
I
I 1 1 0[][] II
I
I 1 1 [][]1311.
1
1 1 1 [][]1311
1
I I 1 13130 11
1
I
1 8.
Inside Surface Air Film
_
0.68 .
1
I
IFraminc Size_ 2' x 4' '1
_
9.
Outside Surface Air Film
8.17
I I
I Framing Spacing 16' o/c I
1 I
Rt= 12.54
WALL
AVEM U YAIff OF ABY
( than 25 # ft^2
X Less than 25 lb/ft2
i I
1 I
I . M BTU/ (hr.ft2. of) I
Framing
Factor = 1.17
_ .048
Rt = 12.54
^
^
^
I U - Value for Heat Load I
I Calculation or Code I
I Comparison I
I � I
ENERGY CONVERSATION GENERAL NOTES
1. All heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equipment
must be certified by the California Energy Commision.
2. Thermostat shall have automatic setback capability of two
periods during a 24 hour period. (excepting heat pumps)
3. Doors and windows shall be fully weatherstripped.
4. Openings shall be caulked and sealed, i.e. around points
.windows, wall openings for utility piping, wiring, etc.
-
5:-
Manufactured doors
and windows shall meet applicable ANSI or
-. --- —..
NWMA standards and
are' -so labeled.'-
abeled.'-6.
6.
All exhaust fans and other exhaust systems shall -be provided '
with back draft or
automatic dampers..,
7..
Ductwork must comply
with Chapter_ 10li Unifom: Mechanical
..
Code.
8.
Water heater shall
be on the C.E.C. approved list.'
9.
Showerheads and
faucets shall be on the. C. E. C. approved
�,.
list.
10.. General I i ght i ng i n kitchen and bathrooms must use 25 l umens
::!--,-Per . watt or. ignore (e.g. fluorescent).
11.- Gas- cooking appliances shall not have. continuously' burning:
pi lots .<.(except- L. P. G.. models, single pi lots .1 less -than -.150
'Btu/hr)), and models with no electrical line voltage. ..
' *12. Slabs that adjoin concrete flatwork (i. e. garage-'* floor,.
sidewalks, stoops,. etc.), are calculated as having a R-7
insulation value to a depth of 18 inches.
4k
=7 T
Enginnnrs,inE.
DEC 3 01985
COMMUNITY OF
DEPT
1731-A WALTER STREET • VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93003 • PHONE (805) -642-6727
December 11, 1985
Augustin Paz
52-329 Oasis Palm #2
Coachella, California 92236
Project: 51-860 Eisenhower
La Quinta, California
Subject: Report of Field Densities
Residents House Pads
B -15824-P1
85-12-232
Submitted herewith is a report of testing and intermittent observations
performed during the grading of the above referenced project . Grading
operations were performed by Jay Manley using conventional heavy equipment.
Testing performed as per authorization of Jay Manley for Augustin Paz. Test
results are presented on the attached test.report sheet with their estimated
locations plotted on the accompanying plan.
Compaction tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 2922-81 and ASTM D
3017-78, Nuclear Test Method . Maximum.density-optimum moisture were deter-
mined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM 1557-78, Method A.
Test results are as follows:
'Soil Description Maximum Density Optimum Moisture
Dark brown silty very fine to find 112.4 pcf 12.1%
sand
Discussion:
1. The purpose of the testing was to observe c-ampliance'toi:
December 11, 1985 -2- B -15824-P1
85-12-232
and test results were still below ninety (90%),percent of relative compaction.
4. Fill materials were removed from the pad. The exposed soils were
then scarified water and compacted.
5. Previously removed soils were then placed in thin layers watered
and compacted untio required density was obtained.
6. A total of eight density tests were taken after the initial grading
and during the regrading of the pad.
7. Test results indicate that a minimum of ninety (90%) percent of relative
compaction has been obtained in the areas tested.
8. Based upon intermittent observation and testing during the grading oper-
ations, from November 15, 1985 through November 26, 1985 on this project,
it is our.opinion that the intent of the recommendations of the refer-
enced soil investigation have been met.
9. We make no warranty, expressed or implied except that our services were
performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted
at this time and location.
10. As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the
progress of work we agreed to be involved with, and performed tests on
which together we based our opinion as to whether the work essentially
complies with the job requirements.
11. With any manufactured products, there are statistical variations in its
'uniformity; and .fin .the accuracy_ef_tests�usecL__to_m�asure its qualitites.
As compared with other manufactured products, field construction usually
has wider fluctuations in both product and test results. Thus, even
with very careful observation and testing, it cannot be said that all
parts of the product comply with the job requirements. Therefore, our
opinion, based on observing and testing the work, means only
that we performed our services in such a manner as to have reasonable
certainty that the work essentially complies with the job requirements.
12. Locations and elevations of in-situ tests were determined in accordance
with their importance and accuracy and proximity of provided survey
control. Unless otherwise noted, their locations and elevations by
pacing and -visual sightings.
BUENA ENGINEERS, INC.
I r7
December 11, 1985
B -15824-P1
85-12-232
If there are any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate
to contact this office.
Respectfully submitted,
BUENA ENGINEERS, INC.
Norm Jackson, Jr,
NJJ/REB/ps
Copies: 2 - Augustin Paz
� /2i- Jay Manley
v L - City of La Quinta
2 - Palm Springs
1 - VTA File
S
BUENA ENGINEERS, INC.
Reviewed and Approved
Raymo d E'* Brannen
CE 28966
CONTRACTOR:
ADDRESS
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
Job NoB-15824-P1
DATE: December 11, 1985 Report No. 85-12-232
JOB a LOCATION: 51-860 Eisenhoer
T � n„ .,r , rA
TEST NO.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
% MOISTURE
DRY DENSITY
RELATIVE
MAXIMUM
TESTED
IN PLACE
IN PLACE
COMPACTION
DENSITY
1
11-15-85
Per Plan Grade
15.6
101.5
90
112.4
2
11-15-85
Per Plan 2.0 BFG
37.1
85.0
76
112.4
3
11-15-85
Retest # 1
21.0
98.1
87
112.4
4
11-15-85
Retest # 2
32.5
82.5
73
112.4
5
11-21-85
Retest # 3
9.3
107.0
95
112.4
6
11-21-85
Retest # 4
13.7
83.0
74
112.4
7
11-26-85
Retest # 5
17.2
102.8
91
112.4
8
11-26-85
Retest # 6
14.3
101.8
91
112.4
WE CERTIFY THAT THESE TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH
COPIES:
BFG = B.elow Finish Grade
BUENA ENGINEERS, INC.
0-.MASQUI�E
PALM TREE
'C): POWER POLE
• � . fav I
4j �C/