05-4281 (SFD)P.O. BOX 1504 T4&t 4
78-495 CALLE TAMPICO
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT
F
BU1��1N RMIT
Application Number. Ns05 ,00004.2.81 A'
Owner:
Property Address: 52395 VIA SAVONA 9 2005 J RIPPEE
$ APN: 772-480-027- - - 16236 SAN DIEGNTO RD.
t, Application description: DWELLING - SINGLE FAMILY D HED P.O. BOX 9080
Property Zoning: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CITY OF LA QUINTA RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
Application valuation: 586264 1 FINANCE DEPT.
Contractor:
Applicant: Architect or Engineer: REESE GENERAL CONTR, KEITH
80209 AVENUE 50
LA QUINTA, CA 92253
(760)564-4599
Lic. No.: OOR SQUARE FOOT Lic. No.: 156102
LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with
Section 700011 of Division 3 of the Business and Professional Code, and m ense is in full force and effect.
LicenseClass: B6C8 I, cense No.: f5 02
t OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractor's State License Law for the
following reason (Sec. 7031 .5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county that requires a permit to
construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for the
permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's State
License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or
that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section. 7031.5 by
any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).:
(_) I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and
the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,
and who does the work himself or herself through his or her own employees, provided that the
improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within
one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or
improve for the purpose of sale.).
(_ 1 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec.
7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of
property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for the projects with a contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractors' State License Law.).
( 1 I am exempt under Sec. , BAP.C. for this reason
Date:
Owner:
CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the
work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ. C.).
Lender's Name:
Lender's Address:
LQPE%NIIT
VOICE (760) 777-7012
FAX (760) 777-7011
INSPECTIONS (760) 777-7153
Date: 12/29/05
WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided
for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued.
I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor
Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation
insurance carrier and policy number are:
Carrier STATE FUND Policy Number 1542671-2005 _
_ I certify that, in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any
person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California,'
and agree that, if I should become subject to woAthoseov
' provisions of Section
3700 of the Labor, I shall f rthwit o ly wis ��Da�. t �,P,ppf2nFa. WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COFUL, AND SHALL
SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($100,000). IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN
SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES.
APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
IMPORTANT Application is hereby made to the Director of Building and Safety for a permit subject to the
conditions and restrictions set forth on this application.
1 . Each person upon whose behalf this application is made, each person at whose request and for
whose benefit work is performed under or pursuant to any permit issued as a result of this application,
the owner, and the applicant, each agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City
of La Quinta, its officers, agents and employees for any act or omission related to the work being
performed under or following issuance of this permit.
2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if work is not commenced
within 180 days from date of issuance of such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject
permit to cancellation.
I certify that 1 have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree tplomply with all
city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and h authori r resentatives
of this county to enter upon the above-mentioned property for inspgption
tem: 1 t.Signature_(Applican7rr
��-2 ��
Application Number . . . . . 05-00004281
Permit . . .
. .
BUILDING PERMIT
Additional desc
.
Permit Fee . .
. .
2300.50
Plan Check Fee
1495.33
Issue Date . .
. .
Valuation . . . .
586264
Expiration Date
. .
6/27/06
Qty Unit
Charge
Per
Extension
BASE
FEE
2039.50
87.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.0000
THOU BLDG
500,001-1,000,000
261.00
Permit .
. .
ELEC-NEW RESIDENTIAL
Additional desc
. .
Permit Fee . .
. .
289.44
Plan Check Fee
72.36
Issue Date . .
. .
Valuation . . . .
0
Expiration Date
. .
6/27/06
Qty Unit
Charge
Per
Extension
BASE
FEE
15.00
6837.00
.0350
ELEC
NEW RES - 1 OR 2 FAMILY
239.30
1007.00
.0200
ELEC
GARAGE OR NON-RESIDENTIAL
20.14
1.00 15.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EA ELEC
TEMPORARY POWER POLE
15.00
Permit .
. .
GRADING PERMIT
Additional desc
.
Permit Fee . .
. .
15.00
Plan Check Fee
.00
Issue Date . .
. .
Valuation . . . .
0
Expiration Date
. .
6/27/06
Qty Unit
Charge
Per
Extension
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BASE
FEE
15.00
Permit .
. .
MECHANICAL
Additional desc
.
Permit Fee . .
. .
132.50
Plan Check Fee
33.13
Issue Date .
. .
Valuation . . . .
0
Expiration Date
. .
6/27/06
Qty Unit
Charge
Per
Extension
BASE
FEE
15.00
4.00
9.0000
EA MECH
FURNACE <=100K
36.00
4.00
9.0000
EA MECH
B/C <=3HP/100K BTU
36.00
6.00
6.5000
EA MECH
VENT FAN
39.00
1.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=--
6.5000
EA MECH
EXHAUST HOOD
6.50
LQPERNIIT
Application Number . . . . . 05-00004281
Permit
PLUMBING
Additional desc . .
Permit Fee . . . .
225.00 Plan Check Fee
56.25
Issue Date . . . .
Valuation . . .
. 0
Expiration Date
6/27/06
Qty Unit Charge
Per
Extension
'
BASE FEE
15.00
25.00 6.0000
EA PLB FIXTURE
150.00
1.00 15.0000
EA PLB BUILDING SEWER
15.00
1.00 7.5000
EA PLB WATER HEATER/VENT
7.50
1.00 3.0000
EA PLB WATER INST/ALT/REP
3.00
1.00 9.0000
EA PLB LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM
9.00
.14.00 .7500
EA PLB GAS PIPE >=5
10.50
1.00 15.0000
EA PLB GAS METER
15.00
--------------------------------------------------------------
Special Notes and Comments
--------------
6837 SQ. FT. SFD THIS
PERMIT DOES NOT
INCLUDE POOL & SPA BLOCK
WALLS OR
DRIVEWAY APPROACH.December
19, 2005
11:01:02 AM jjohnson
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Fees . . . . .
. . . . ART IN PUBLIC PLACES -RES
965.66
DIF COMMUNITY CENTERS -RES
74.00
DIF CIVIC CENTER - RES
480.00
ENERGY REVIEW FEE
149.53
DIF FIRE PROTECTION -RES
140.00
GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE
.00
DIF LIBRARIES - RES
355.00
DIF PARK MAINT FAC - RES
22.00
DIF PARKS/REC - RES
892.00
STRONG MOTION (SMI) - RES
58.62
DIF STREET MAINT FAC -RES
67.00
DIF TRANSPORTATION - RES
1666.00
Fee summary Charged
---------------------------
Paid Credited
------------------------------
Due
Permit Fee Total
2962.44 .00 .00
2962.44
Plan Check Total
1657.07 500.00 .00
1157.07
Other Fee Total
4869.81 .00 .00
4869.81
Grand Total
9489.32 500.00 .00
8989.32
LQPERMIT
� a
Sladden Engineering.
6782 Stanton Ave.. Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369
39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895
August 13, 2003
ND La Quinta Partners, LLC
51-100 ;Venue 53
La Quinta, California 9223
Attention: Mr. Dan Williams
Project: The Hideaway - Tract 29894-2
Phase 1 B
La Quinta, California
Subject: Report of Observations and Testing During Fine Grading
Project No. 54—'.-2199
03-07-456
Ref: Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Earth Systems Southwest dated
April l I, 2001; File No. OSI 19-01, Report No. 04-04-716
Report of Testing and Observation During Rough Grading prepared by ESS dated
AuQust 2S. 2002, File No. 071 17-1 1, Report No. 01-07-71 S
Geotechnical Update prepared by Sladden Engineering dated tMay 13. 2003.
IA Project No. 522-2199, Report No. 03-04-225.
Suillmarized in this report are the results of in-place density tests performed at the subject site
during the fine ,radina of the building pads along with pertinent observations. The subject lots
are located within the southern portion of the Hideaway project site in the City of La Quinta.
California. Fine grading was performed by Nuevo Engineerina using conventional heavy
.W. � equipment.
The previously rougil graded building pad areas were watered and the surface was recompacted
with heavy equipment. In fill areas, soils obtained fi-om the cut areas of the project site were
placed in thin lifts at near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 Percent relative
compaction. Some additional overexcavation was performed on various lots that were
reconfigured to include areas beyond the previous oyerexcavation limits. The tine grading was
performed as recommended in the referenced Geotechnical Update Report prepared by Sladden
Engineering.
Observations and field testing was performed frons June 2, 2003 to August I, 2003. Testing
indicates that a nllnlnlunl of 90 Percent relative compaction was attained in the areas tested. The
passing test results indicate compliance with the project specifications at the tested locations and
depths but are no guarantee or \varranty of the contractors work.
Field Tests: In-place moisture/density tests were performed using a nuclear density gauge in
accordance with test methods QST. -M D 2922 and ASTiVI D 30 1-7. A total of 292 density tests
.were performed. The approximate test locations are indicated on the attached plan and test results
are summarized on the attached data sheets.
August 13, 2003 -2- Project No. 522-2199
03-PASb
Laboratory Tests: The moisture -density- relationships For the tested materials were determined
in the laboratory in accordance with test method ASTM D 1557-91.
Allowable Bearing Pressures: The structural values recommended in the Geotechnical
Engineering Report prepared by Sladden Engineering remain applicable for use in foundation
design. Conventional shallow spread footings should be bottomed into properly compacted fill
material a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footings should be at
least 12 inches wide and isolated pad footings should be at least 2 feet wide. Continuous footings
and isolated pad footings should be designed utilizing allowable bearing pressures of 1800 psf
and 2000 psf, respectively. The recommended allowable bearing pressures may be increased by
one-third for wind and seismic loading.
The bearing soils are non -expansive and fall within the "very low" expansion category in
accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC) classification criteria.
If there are any questions regarding this report or the testing summarized herein, please contact
the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted
SLADDEN ENGINEERING
� QPpFESS/p/V,
0 \-. ANDF9 �Fy
S
Brett L. Anders n n
Principal Engineer No. c 453as
* Exp.9/30/06
F
Grading/pcsTgTF CI V F C I \F���\
Copies 4/ND La Quinta Partners. LLC
u
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase I B
LOCATION: La Quinti, California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test INo.
Date Tested
Location
Elevition I
Dry Density
In Place I
% Moisture';
In Place !
Relative ,
Compaction
Maximum
Density
Building Pads
t
1
6-02-03
Lot 225/226
3.0 BPG ;
100.7 i
10.1
90
112.0
2
: 6-02-03
Lot 225/226
3.0 BPG i
100.4
10.2
90
112.0
3
6-02-03
Lot 214
PG
100.8 1
11.0
90
112.0
4
6-02-03
Lot 214
PG
101.1
10.9 '
90 i
112.0
5
6-02-03
Lot 225/226
PG !
102.8 I
11.0
92
112.0
6
6-02-03
Lot 225/226
PG ;
105.1
8.9
94
112.0
7
1 6-02-03
Lot 133
2.0 BPG
101.8
9.7 i
91
112.0
8
! 6-02-03
Lot 135
2.0 BPG
100.5 j
10.1
90
112.0
9
6-02-03
Lot 137
2.0 BPG ;
103.1
10.4
92 i
112.0
10
6-02-03
Lot 147
2.0 BPG '
102.0 !
9.3
91
112.0
I 1
; 6-03-03
Lot 142
2.0 BPG
100.9
9.6
91
112.0
12
6-03-03
Lot 143
2.0 BPG
100.4 I
10.7 1
90
112.0
13
16-03-03
Lot 145
2.0 BPG 1
101.8
15.3
91 i
112.0
14
6-04-03 i
Lot 152
4.0 BPG
89.6
12.5 1
80"
112.0
15
: 6-05-03 `
Lot 136
PG
102.9
11.7
92
112.0
16
6-05-03
Lot 137
PG
101.1
5.0
90
112.0
17
; 6-05-03
Lot 138
PG j
103.8
5.4
93
112.0
18
6-05-03
Lot 139
PG
104.6
5.8
93
112.0
19
- 6-05-03
Lot 141
PG
109.1
6.9
97
112.0
20
; 6-05-03
Lot 142
PG i
101.2
8.1 !
90 ; .
112.0
21
: 6-05-03
Lot 143
PG 1
111.9
8.7
99
112.0
226-05-03
Lot 144
PG
107.9
7.4
96
112.0
23
6-05-03
Lot 145
PG
109.4
11.1
98
112.0
24
6 -OS -03
Lot 146
PG
111.3 j
12.0
99
112.0
25
6-05-03
Lot 147
PG
102.8
11.4
92
112.0
26
6-05-03
Lot 148
PG
I
100.6
I
9.3
90 !
112.0
27
6-06-03
Lot 149
PG
103.2
15.6
92
112.0
28
6-06-03
Lot 150
PG
108.9
6.9
97
1110
29
6-06-03
Lot 135
PG
100.8
13.7
90112.0
30
6-06-03
Lot 134
PG 1
101.7
8.7
91
112.0
31
6-06-03
Lot 133
PG I
100.5
9.8
90 ':
112.0
32
6-06-03
Lot 132
PG
101.6
5.7
91
112.0
33
6-06-03
Lot 131
PG
100.4
5.9
90
112.0
DATE:
Am-nist 13. 2003
Sladden Engineering
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase 1 B
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No. Date Tested . Location Elevation � Dry Density % Moisture i Relative Maximum
In Place In Place Compaction Density
Building Pads
34
6-06-03
Lot 130
35
6-06-03
Lot 129
36
i 6-06-03
Lot 128
37
: 6-06-03
j
Lot 127
38
6-06-03
Lot 126
39
': 6-06-03
Lot 125
40
` 6-09-03
Retest # 14
41
6-09-03
Lot 152
42
6-09-03
Lot 124/123
43
6-09-03
Lot 124/123
44
; 6-10-03
Lot 229
45
'. 6-10-03
Lot 151
46
6-10-03
Lot 152
47
6-10-03
Lot 153
48
: 6-10-03
Lot 154
49
6-10-03
Lot 124
50
6-11-03
Lot 106
51
6-11-03
Lot 106
52
6-11-03
Lot 106
53
6-1 1-03
Lot 106
54
6-11-03
Lot 106
556-1
1-03
Lot 106
56
6-12-03
Lot 106
7
6-12-03
Lot 106
58
6-12-03
Lot 105
59
6-12-03
Lot 117
60
6-12-03
Lot 118
61
6-12-03
Lot 119
62
6-12-03
Lot 120
63
6-12-03
Lot 121
64
6-12-03
Lot 122
65
6-12-03
Lot 218
66
6-12-03
Lot 217
DATE.
Au,ust I1 2003
PG
108.0
8.6
96
PG
109.6
7.8
98
PG
102.9
9.4 ;
92
PG
101.0
9.4
90
PG
111.3
11.2
99
PG
102.9
7.8
92
96
94
97
97
90
99
97
99
97
91
91
91
95
91
92
90
93
91
95
91
93
93
86*
92
91
90
99
j 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
j 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
11-2.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
1 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
1 12.0
112.0
Skieldert Engineering
107.6
11.0
2.0 BPG
105.1
9.7
4.0 BPG
109.0
10.4 i
2.0 BPG
108.6 !
11.3
5.0 BPG
100.4
13.2 I
PG !
111.5
9.8
PG
108.1
8.4
PG
111.2 i
4.9 '
PG
108.8
4.6 i
PG
102.2
5.0
4.0 BPG .
101.4
6.6
5.0 BPG
101.6
6.7
2.0 BPG
106.3
7.2
2.0 BPG ;
101.8
13.8 i
PG
103.1
10.7
PG
100.6 '
9.8
i
10.0 BPG:
103.7
10.6
10.0 BPG:
102.1
5.3
10.0 BPG
106.4
8.2
PG
102.0
6.4
PG
103.9
5.2
PG
103.9
7.7
PG
96.4
7.0
PG
103.0
5.6
PG
101.6
6.4
PG
100.9
14.2
PG
111.6
10.3
96
94
97
97
90
99
97
99
97
91
91
91
95
91
92
90
93
91
95
91
93
93
86*
92
91
90
99
j 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
j 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
11-2.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
1 112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
1 12.0
112.0
Skieldert Engineering
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: F-Jidea way -mase
LOCATION: La Quinta. California REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested
Location
Elevation
Dry Density
In Place
% Moisture
In Place
Relative
Compaction
1 Maximum
' Density
I
Building Pads
•
67
6-12-03 ;
Lot 216
PG
104.0
13.7
93
112.0
68
6-12-03
Lot 215
PG
111.0
7.7
99
112.0
69
; 6-13-03
Lot 104
10.0 BPG:;
109.6
7.9
98
112.0
70
6-13-03
Lot 99
10.0 BPG
106.3
6.1
95
112.0
71
6-13-03 j
Lot 101
10.0 BPG :
100.8 i
10.9
90
112.0
72
6-13-03
Lot 103
10.0 BPG:
106.0
7.8 !
95
112.0
73
6-13-03
Lot 106
10.0 BPG,
111.0
8.5
99
112.0
74
6-13-03
Lot 106
8.0 BPG I
105.1 (
7.8
94
112.0
75
6-13-03
Lot 107
8.0 BPG
100.9
12.2 !
90
; 112.0
76
i 6-13-03
Lot 106
8.0 BPG 1
102.2
9.1
91
112.0
77
6-13-03
Lot 106
7.0 BPG
109.0
10.3 ;
97
112.0
78
6-13-03
Lot 229
3.0 BPG
104.1
9.3
93
112.0
79
6-13-03
Lot 229
1.0 BPG
10 7. 3)
10.5 i
96
112.0
80
! 6-13-03 !
Lot 214
PG110.4
4.9
98
112.0
81
; 6-13-03
Lot 219
PG
104.3 j
8.6
93
112.0
82
6-13-03
Lot 220
PG
104.6
4.2 1
93
112.0
33
i 6-13-03
Lot 221
PG
105.6
9.1
94
112.0
84
6-13-03 i
Lot 222
PG
103.4
9.9
92
112.0
35
6-13-03
Lot 223
PG
102.8 !
12.4
92
112.0
86
+ 6-13-03
Lot 209
PG
104.5
7.8 i
93
112.0
87
6-13-03
Lot 210
PG
100.3
4.8
90
112.0
88
! 6-13-03 4
Lot 211
PG
103.7
7.9
93
112.0
89
6-13-03
i
Lot 212
PG
108.2
8.1 i
97
112.0
90
6-16-03
Lot 213
PG
111.3
6.1
99
112.0
91
6-16-03
Lot 224
PG
104.7
10.5
94
112.0
9
6-16-03
Lot 225
PG
107.5
9.3
i
96
112.0
93
6-17-03
Lot 226
PG
103.1
8.1
92
112.0
94
6-17-03
Lot 227
PG
1 1 1.3
4.8
99
112.0
95
6-17-03
Lot 228
PG
107.7
10.1
96
112.0
96
6-17-03
Lot 208
PG
111.8
14.0
99
112.0
97/
! 6-17-03
Lot 207
PG
106.0
8.9
95
112.0
98
6-17-03
Lot 206
PG
107.0
9.4
96
112.0
99
6-17-03
Lot 237
PG
109.6
11.5
98
112.0
100
6-17-03
Lot 236
PG
103.3
8.4
92
112.0
DATE:
ALIQnst 13. 2003
C/.al�/.,n F',roinrwrinv
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase I13
LOCATION: La Quinta. California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested i
Location
Elevation
Dry Density;
% Moisture !
Relative
Maximum
In Place j
In Place
Compaction
Density
I
Building Pads
101
6-17-03
Lot 235
PG
108.5
15.5
97
112.0
102
; 6-17-03
Lot 234
PG
105.7
9.0
94
112.0
103
j 6-17-03 `.
Lot 106
6.0 BPG i
101.0 i
8.2
90
112.0
104
6-17-03
Lot 107
6.0 BPG
104.6 j
6.8
93
112.0
105
6-17-03 !
Lot 105
8.0 BPG :
100.4
13.2
90
112.0
106
6-17-03
Lot 241
4.0 BPG
104.4
7.0
93
112.0
107
6-17-03
Lot 242
2.0 BPG ;
101.1
6.8 I
90
112.0
108
; 6-18-03
Lot 238
PG
106.1
10.3
95
112.0
109
6-18-03
Lot 239
PG
109.5
11.2 i
98
112.0
110
.6-18-03
Lot 233
PG
105.9
8.5
95
112.0
111
6-18-03
Lot 232
PG
109.0
13.8
97
112.0
112
. 6-18-03
Lot 240
PG
111.3
7.8 j
99
112.0
113
6-18-03
Lot 231
PG
103.2
9.9
92
! 112.0
114
: 6-18-03)
Lot 230
PG
103.9
11.5
93
112.0
115
i 6-18-03
Lot 102
4.0 BPG ;
104.8
4.7
94
! 112.0
116
16-18-03
Lot 106
4.0 BPG
102.8
15.3
92
i 112.0
117
:6-18-03
Lot 245
4.0 BPG j
106.4
11.6 j
95
112.0
118
; 6-18-03
Lot 245
2.0 BPG !
104.0 !
10.7 !
93
112.0
119
.6-18-03
Lot 247
4.0 BPG
111.0
7.3
99
112.0
120
6-18-03
I
Lot 247
2.0 BPG
107.4
8.2
96
; 11.2.0
121
` 6-19-03
i
Lot 229
I
PG
107.3
8.8
96
I
112.0
122
6-20-03
Lot 103
8.0 BPG
106.0
6.3
95
112.0
123
6-20-03
Lot 104
8.0 BPG
101.9 1
5.7
91
112.0
124
6-20-03 !
Lot 105
6.0 BPG
10 9. 3) 1
7.5
98
112.0
125
6-20-03
Lot 106
4.0 BPG :
104.7
7.2
94
112.0
126
: 6-20-03
Lot 107
4.0 BPG ,
106.4 1
7.3
95
112.0
127
6-20-03
Lot 241
PG
107.0
13.4
96
112.0
1'28
6-20-03
Lot 242
PG
105.2
9.6
94
112.0
129
: 6-20-03
Lot 243
PG
105.1
5.3
94
112.0
130
6-20-03
Lot 244
PG
104.2
6.0
93
112.0
131
6-20-03
Lot 193
PG
108.8 j
14.0 !
97
112.0
132
6-20-03
Lot 194
PG
107.1 '
9.9
96
1 112.0
133
6-20-03
Lot 195
PG
108.8
10.9
97
112.0
134
6-20-03
Lot 196
PG
102.E
9.3
92
112.0
DATE: Au,ust 13, 2003
Vat m Etwhieerine
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Please I B
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested
Location
Elevation
Dry Density i
°'o Moisture
Relative
iv1aximu n
In Place
In Place I
Compaction
Density
i
Building Pads
i
135
6-23-03 .
Lot 192
PG
i
103.1
7.3
92
112.0
136
6-23-03
Lot 191
PG
102.0
11.2
91
112.0
137
6-23-03
Lot 190
PG
100.4 ;
9.4
90
112.0
138
6-23-03
Lot 189
PG i
106.1
9.3
95
112.0
139
i 6-23-03
Lot 188
PG
109.4
7.1 1
98
112.0
140
i 6-23-03
Lot 197
PG I
103.4
8.2
92
112.0
141
! 6-23-03
Lot 198
PG
101.4
5.9 i
91
112.0
142
' 6-23-03
Lot 199
PG
102.1
5.1
91
112.0
143
: 6-23-03
Lot 200
PG
102.8 !
5.6
92
112.0
144
16-23-03
Lot 201
i
PG
102.7
7.6 ;
92
112.0
145
' 6-23-03Lot
110
6.0 BPG
110.0
4.8
98
112.0
146
6-23-03
Lot 104
5.0 BPG `
I
105.5
5.9 I
94
112.0
147
6-24-03
Lot 187
PG
109.1
7.3 1
97
112.0
148
6-24-03
Lot 186
PG
111.1
7.4
99
112.0
149
6-24-03
Lot 202
PG
105.1
9.5
94
112.0
150
6-24-03
Lot 203
PG
106.1
7.0 I
95
112.0
151
6-24-03
Lot 204
PG
111.4
6.2
99
112.0
152
6-24-03
Lot 205
PG '
105.1 i
7.6 1
94
112.0
153
6-24-03
Lot 245
PG
104.2
6.8
93
112.0
154
, 6-24-03 j
Lot 246
PG
111.0
7.2
99
112.0
155
6-24-03
Lot 104
2.0 BPG ;
109.8
6.7
98
112.0
156
i 6-24-03 !
Lot 103
4.0 BPG ;
109.1 i
6.9
97
112.0
157
6-24-03
Lot 102
6.0 BPG !
105.2
10.6
94
112.0
158
6-24-03
Lot 246
4.0 BPG
106.7
10.7
95
112.0
159
6-24-03
Lot 2=46
2.0 BPG '
108.5 �
11.3) i
97
112.0
160
6-24-03
Lot 247
4.0 BPG
1 1 1.9
9.8 i
99
112.0
161
6-24-03
Lot 247
2.0 BPG
111.4
7.2
99
112.0
162
6-25-03
Lot 249
i
PG
104.9
9.9 I
94
112.0
163
6-25-03
Lot 248
PG
104.4
14.7
93
112.0
164
6-25-03
Lot 250
PG
109.5
11.0
98
112.0
165
6-25-03
Lot 2=47
PG
101.8
i
13.7
91
112.0
DATE:Au,ust 13. 2003
Sluddeit En -Meering
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase 1 B
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested ;
Lucation
Elevation
Dry Density;
In Place
% Moisture '
In Place
Relative :
Compaction
Maximum
Density
Building Pads
166
6-26-03
Lot 251
PG ;
101.6
8.6
91
112.0
167
6-26-03
Lot 252
PG
105.5 j
7.6
94
112.0
168
6-26-03
Lot 253
PG
101.5
6.8
91
112.0
169
i 6-26-03
Lot 254
PG
101.2
13.2
91
112.0
170
; 6-26-03
Lot 255
PG
100.5
7.7
90 !
112.0
171
6-26-03
Lot 264
PG
105.0 '
8.4
94
112.0
172
6-26-03
Lot 265
PG
103.1
8.0
92
112.0
173
: 6-26-03
Lot 266
PG
103.3
9.3
92 i
112.0
174
6-26-03
Lot 267
PG
100.9
11.3 '
90
112.0
175
6-26-03
Lot 263
PG
102.9
6.4
92
112.0
176
; 6-26-03
Lot 262
PG
102.5
6.1
92
112.0
177
; 6-26-03
Lot 256
PG
111.3
8.6
99
112.0
178
6-26-03 !
Lot 257
PG
108.3
12.0
97 !
112.0
179
6-26-03
Lot 258
PG ':
104.0
8.2
93 i
112.0
180
6-26-03
Lot 259
PG '
103.2
7.2
92
112.0
181
6-26-03 i
Lot 260
PG
105.3
8.3
94
112.0
182
6-26-03
Lot 261
PG
104.0
8.4
93 i
112.0
183
6-30-03
Lot 268
PG I
102.8
6.2
92
112.0
I S4
6-30-03
Lot 269
PG
104.3
7.7 !
93
112.0
185
6-30-03
I
Lot 270
PG
106.5 (
10.9
95
112.0
1 S6
7-01-03
Lot 275
PG
105.9 I
9.2
95
112.0
187
7-01-03
Lot 271
PG
105.0
7.0
94
112.0
ISS
; 7-01-03 1
Lot 272
PG
104.4
8.7
93
112.0
1 S9
7-02-03
Lot 276
PG
1041
I
8.0
93
112.0
190
7-02-03
Lot 277
PG
107.2
9.7
96
112.0
191
7-02-03
Lot 278
PG
110.9 '.
11.4 i
99
112.0
192
7-02-03
Lot 279
PG
105.5 ;
10.8
94
112.0
193
7-02-03
Lot 280
PG
108.1
8.1
97
112.0
194
7-02-03
Lot 293
PG
103.0 i
9.1
92
112.0
195
7-02-03
Lot 294
PG
106.3
I
7.6
95
112.0
DATE: At1�,tIst 13, 2003
Slrulden Engineering
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: 1-lideaway-Phase I B PROJECT NO: 522-2199
LOCATION: La Quinta, California REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested'
Location
Elevation
Dry Density'
In Place
% Moisture
In Place i
Relative
Compaction ;
Maximum
Density
Building Pads
j
196
7-03-03
Lot 281
i
PG
101.9
9.1 1
91
112.0
197
7-03-03
Lot 282
PG
103.3
7.0
92
112.0
198
7-03-03 ;
Lot 283
PG
101.38.3
90
112.0
199
7-03-03
Lot 284
PG
108.9
6.9
97
112.0
200
7-03-03 i
Lot 285
PG
106.0
6.8
95
112.0
201
7-03-03
Lot 289
PG
109.9
8.9 i
98
112.0
202
7-03-03
Lot 290
PG
109.3
7.6
98
112.0
203
7-03-03 !
Lot 291
PG !
102.5 I
11.2
92
112.0
204
j 7-03-03
Lot 292
PG i
111.1
8.1
99
112.0
205
7-03-03
Lot 286
PG !
102.0
5.6 !
91
112.0
206
7-03-03
Lot 287
PG
10 4. 3)
11.4
93
112.0
207
7-03-03
Lot 302
PG
100.4
5.4
90
112.0
208
7-03-03
Lot 302
4.0 BPG '
104.0
9.0
93
112.0
209
7-03-03
Lot 302
2.0 BPG
105.5
8.9
94 !
112.0
210
7-03-03
Lot 304
4.0 BPG
104.4 1
8.1 !
93
112.0
211
7-03-03
Lot 304
2.0 BPG
101.8
7.8
91
112.0
212
; 7-03-03
Lot 304
4.0 BPG '
103.1
7.9
92
112.0
213
7-03-03
Lot 304
2.0 BPG
100.7
8.5
90
112.0
214
7-07-03
Lot 288
PG
105.0 i
8.7
94
112.0
215
7-08-03
Lot 273
j
PG
104.0
6.8 i
93
112.0
216
7-08-03
Lot 274
PG
102.9
6.3 !
92 ;.
112.0
217
7-08-03
Lot 299
PG
108.2
11.0
97
1110
218
7-08-03
Lot 300
PG
107.5 I
9.3
96
112.0
219
7-08-03
Lot 301
PG
105.2
7.2
94
112.0
220
7-09-03
Lot 298
PG i
104.4
5.1
93
112.0
221
7-09-03
Lot 297
PG
106.2
5.6
95
112.0
222
7-09-03
Lot 296
PG
104.3 1 .
6.0
i
93
112.0
223
7-10-03
Lot 303
PG
109.6
8.7
98
112.0
X24
7-10-03
Lot 304
PG
107.0
8.9
96
1 12.0
225
7-10-03
Lot 305
PG
104.2
14.3
93
112.0
226
7-10-03
Lot 306
PG
103.1
11.4
92
1110
227
7-10-03
Lot 307
PG
101.4
9.6
91
112.0
228
7-10-03
Lot 308
PG
109.6
6.4
98
112.0
DATE:Au'-ust 13, 2003
Sladden En;ineerinn
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: 1-11cleaway-Phase I B PROJECT NO: 522-2199
LOCATION: La Quinta, California REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested
Location
Elevation
! Dry Density.
In Place
% Moisture
In Place i
Relative
Compaction I
Maximum
Density
1
Building Pads
I
!
I
�
229
7-10-03
Lot 309
PG
11 1.3
6.5
99
112.0
230
7-11-03 1
Lot 310
PG
103.2 I
8.1
92 ;
112.0
231
7-11-03 i
Lot 311
PG
100.7
6.7 1
90
112.0
232
: 7-11-03 !
Lot 312
PG
105.3 !
8.2 j
94 !
112.0
233
, 7-11-03
Lot 313
PG
102.0
11.9
91
112.0
234
' 7-11 -03
Lot 314
PG
105.5 I
9.2
94
112.0
235
7-11-03
Lot 315
PG
101.4 1
5.6
91
112.0
236
7-11-03
Lot 316
PG
106.7 i
11.3 i
95
112.0
237
; 7-16-03
Lot 317
PG
104.4
5.4
93
112.0
238
7-16-03
Lot 318
PG
103.1
8.3
92
112.0
239
7-16-03
Lot 319
PG
100.7
7.3 '
90
112.0
240
7-16-03
Lot 320
PG10-
9 i
8.7
95
112.0
241
7-16-03
Lot 321
PG I
101.4 ;
8.8
91
112.0
242
7-16-03 i'
Lot 322
PG
102.8
6.0
92
112.0
243
7-18-03
Lot 337
I
PG
107.3
6.8
96
112.0
244
7-18-03
Lot 338
PG
111.0
7.2
99
112.0
245
7-18-03
Lot 339
PG
110.8
5.9
99
112.0
246
7-18-03
Lot 340
PG
108.5 j
6.4
97
112.0
247
7-18-03
Lot 341
PG
104.3
7.0
93
112.0
248
' 7-18-03 I
Lot 342
PG
100.6
6.1
90 (
112.0
249
7-21-03
Lot 336
PG
110.1
i
8.8
98
112.0
250
7-21-03 '
Lot 335
PG
100.4 '
6.4
90
112.0
251
7-21-03
Lot 334
PG
103.8
14.8
93
112.0
252
7-21-03
Lot 333
PG
105.1
11.2
94
112.0
253
7-21-03
Lot 332
PG i
108.5 1
11.3
97
112.0
254
7-21-03
Lot 331
PG ,
107.1 1
8.4
96
112.0
255
7-21-03
Lot 330
PG
111.3
8.5
99
112.0
256
7-23-03
Lot 323
PG
105.5
8.5
94
112.0
2) 5 7
7-23-03
Lot 324
PG
105.7
10.5
94
112.0
258
7-23-03
Lot 325
PG
102.2
13.5
91
112.0
259
7-23-03
Lot 326
PG
109.2
6.1
98
112.0
260
; 7-23-03
Lot 327
PG
100.8
6.8
90
112.0
DATE:
Au,ust 13, 2003
Sladden Emobteerina
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase I B
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Test No.
Date Tested
Location
Elevation
Dry Density!
°'o Moisture Relative
! i laxinlurn
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
I
Building Pads
i
261
7-23-03
Lot 328
PG
101.2
7.7
90
112.0
262
7-23-03
i Lot 329
PG
102.0
9.6
91
112.0
263
7-23-03
Lot 180
PG
104.3
7.3
93
112.0
264
7-23-03
Lot 181
PG
109.0 I
8.4
97
112.0
265
! 7-23-03
Lot 182
PG
111.3
7.3
99
112.0
266
: 7-23-03
Lot 183
PG
105.9
7.4
95
112.0
267
7-23-03
Lot 184
PG +
107.6
8.1
I 96
112.0
268
7-23-03
Lot 185
PG
101.8
14.7
I 91
112.0
269
7-24-03
Lot 179
PG
107.1
7.2
96
112.0
270
7-24-03
! Lot 178
PG
105.4
6.9
1 94
112.0
271
' 7-24-03
i Lot 177
PG
106.1
6.2
i 95
112.0
272
7-24-03
Lot 176
PG
102.5
9.3
92
112.0
273
7-24-03
Lot 175
PG
108.7
8.4
97
j 112.0
274
7-24-03
Lot 174
PG ;
111.3 !
11.8
99
! 112.0
275
7-25-03
i
i Lot 173
PG
104.9
10.4
i 94
112.0
276
' 7-25-03
i Lot 172
PG
110.5
10.2
99
112.0
277
; 7-25-03
i Lot 171
PG
105.3
7.6
94
112.0
278
7-25-03
Lot 170
PG
102.8
4.7
i 92
112.0
279
; 7-25-03
Lot 169
PG
103.4 '
9.9
92
112.0
280
7-25-03
Lot 168
PG !
102.0
8.7
91
112.0
281
7-25-03
Lot 167
PG
105.7
7.6
94
112.0
282
7-28-03
1 Lot 165
PG
103.2
11.0
I
I 92
'
112.0
283
7-28-03
Lot 164
PG
104.0
9.3
93
112.0
284
7-28-03
' Lot 163
PG
105.2
12.6
94
112.0
285
7-28-03
Lot 162
PG
102.1
11.7
91
112.0
286
7-28-03
Lot 161
PG
103.9
15.0
93
112.0
287
7-28-03
Lot 160
PG
102.2
10.6
91
112.0
288
7-28-03
Lot 159
PG
106.0
10.0
95
112.0
DATE: August 13. 2003
Slmldei: Eirgineerirrg
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Phase 113
LOCATION: La Quina, California
Test No. Date Tested Location
DATE: All<QUSt 13, 2003
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Elevation
Dry Density I
i
Building Pads
289
8-01-03
In Place
Lot 343
290
i 8-01-03
Lot 344
291
8-01-03
!
Lot 345
292
8-01-03
92
Lot 346
PG
101.7 I
5.4
BPG - Below Pad Grade
j 112.0
i
100.9 ;
PG - Pad Grade
DATE: All<QUSt 13, 2003
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-07-456
Elevation
Dry Density I
% Moisture
Relative
; Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
i
!
PG
102.8
6.1
92
I 112.0
PG
101.7 I
5.4
91
j 112.0
PG
100.9 ;
4.7
90
112.0
PG
110.4
c
I
i
6.4 I
•
90
I 112.0
I
i
Sladdeii Eit-Meering
.:a
Sladden
Engineering
6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369
39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895
October 3, 2003
ND La Quinta Partners, LLC
5 1 -100 Avenue 53
La Quinta, California 92253
Attention: Mr. Dan Williams
Project: The Hideaway - Area D
Via Pontito
La Quinta, California
Project No. 544-2199
03-10-638
Subject: Report of Observations and Testing During Fine Grading
Ref: Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Earth Systems Southwest dated
April 11, 2001; File No. 08119-01, Report No. 04-04-716
Report of Testing and Observation During Rough Grading prepared by ESS dated
August 28, 2002, File No. 07117-11, Report No. 0 1 -07-718
Geotechnical Update prepared by Sladden Engineering dated May 13, 2003,
Project No. 522-2199, Report No. 03-04-225.
Summarized in this report are the results of in-place density tests performed at the subject site
during the fine aradina of the building pads along with pertinent observations. The subject lots
are located along Via Pontito within the northern portion of the Hideaway project site in the City
of La Quinta, California. Fine grading was performed by Nuevo Engineering using conventional
heavy equipment.
The previously rough graded building pad areas Nvere watered and the surface was recompacted
with heavy equipment. Areas that extend beyond the 'previously rough graded pads were
overexcavated to the revised building envelopes. Additional overexcavation was required on lots
2,3,9,10, and 11. Soils obtained from other areas of the Hideaway project site were placed in thin
lifts at near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 Percent relative compaction.
The fine Grading was performed as recommended in the referenced Geotechnical Update report
prepared by Sladden EngineerinG.
Observations and field testing was performed from September 4, 2003 through September 9,
2003. Testina indicates that a minimum of 90 Percent relative compaction was attained in the
areas tested. The passing test results indicate compliance with the project specifications at the
tested locations and depths but are no Guarantee or warrant) of the contractors work.
October 3. 2003 -2- Project No. 522-2199
03-10-638
Field Tests: In-place moisture/density tests were performed using a nuclear density gauge in
accordance with test methods ASTM D 2922 and ASTM D 3017. A total of 19 density tests were
performed. The approximate test locations are indicated on the attached plan and test results are
summarized on the attached data sheets.
Laboratory Tests: The moisture -density relationships for the tested materials were determined
in the laboratory in accordance with test method ASTNI D 1557-91.
Allowable Bearing Pressures: The structural values recommended in the Geotechnical
Engineering Report prepared by Sladden Engineering remain applicable for use in foundation
design. Conventional shallow spread footings should be bottomed into properly compacted fill
material a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footings should be at
least 12 inches wide and isolated pad footings should be at least 2 feet wide. Continuous footings
and isolated pad footings should be designed utilizing allowable bearing pressures of 1800 psf
and 2000 psf, respectively. The recommended allowable bearing pressures may be increased by
one-third for wind and seismic loading.
The bearing soils are non -expansive and fall within the "very low" expansion category in
accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC) classification criteria.
If there are any questions regarding this report or the testing summarized herein, please contact
the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted
SLADDEN ENGINEERING
ePOpESSInA�A
Brett L. Ande son
Principal Engineer 1 s No.
it Exp. 9,30 M
Grading/pc \�TFOFCA\��iGQ/
Copies 44ND La Quinta Partners, LLC
TEST RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Hideaway -Area D
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
Test No. Date Tested Location
Building Pads -Via Pontito
1
9-04-03
1 Lot 9/10
2
9-04-03
Lot 10/ 1 1
3
9-05-03
Lot 2/3
4
+ 9-05-03
Lot 2/3
5
' 9-05-03
Lot 10
6
9-05-03
Lot 10
7
9-08-03
Lot 6
8
9-08-03
i Lot 7
9
9-08-03
j Lot 8
10
9-08-03
Lot 9
11
9-08-03
Lot 10
12
9-08-03
Lot 1 1
13
9-08-03
Lot 12
14
9-08-03
Lot 13
15
9-09-03
Lot 5
16
9-09-03
Lot 4
17
9-09-03
Lot 3
18
9-09-03
Lot 2
19
9-09-03
Lot I
DATE: October 3. 2003
PROJECT NO: 522-2199
REPORT NO: 03-10-638
Elevation
Dry Density i
In Place
% Moisture ;
In Place 1
Relative
Compaction
Maximum
Density
3.0 BPG'
101.4
7.5 !
91
112.0
3.0 BPG ;
103.7
12.6
93
112.0
i
4.0 BPGj
105.4 I
9.8 i
94
i 112.0
2.0 BPG
100.9
10.1
90
i 112.0
4.0 BPG `
I 1 1.3
9.9
99
112.0
2.0 BPG
105.0
8.7
94
112.0
PG
108.3 1
6.7 I
97
i 112.0
PG
108.6 j
5.0
97
! 112.0
PG
105.4
9.2
94
i 112.0
PG
107.1
6.4
96
112.0
PG
103.9
4.9
93
112.0
PG
106.2
5.4
95
112.0
PG
107.4 i
5.5
96
112.0
PG
110.9
8.2
99
112.0
PG i
117.0 i
11.1 I
99
112.0
PG I
106.7
12.4
95
112.0
PG
111.0 '
11.1 I
99
112.0
PG
109.3 j
11.1 I
98
112.0
PG
110.7 ':
9.9
i
I
i
99
112.0
i
i
Sladrlen Engineering