Loading...
Ratings Sheets - Round 1REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant:-7-E P Reviewer:_- I&C,<5 Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 20 Experience with similar kinds of work 25 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 Total 100 77 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) 1141) rW Ala C4,-"yerGo Comments:liyr,2 FQ ND7 /%Ifs�Vi/OnJF�j FES TOTAL 77 cam. Reviewer's Signature REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: Date: l �' Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done WZ4, z Experience with similar kinds of work 26 l 4ti Quality of staff for work to be done 20 S' Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 10 a 15' Format/Organization UFrigtte-00 itbes�IntlEMgiblesj— 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: r ► v,-P- n► K - f 6 , tI(r►� w TOTAL I Reviewer's Signature REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: l Reviewer: �,' r E Date: --- Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 2 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 U Cost 10 io Format/Organization 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) rc r rr T Cli,AC_ p'JV ;;� • l 1�if �'I Comments: TOTAL !f Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures -15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Y REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: 169A T/D1v Reviewer: / Date: Z Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 20 / 7 Experience with similar kinds of work 25 2,D Quality of staff for work to be done 20 /S Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 -3 Total 100 77 No ctiu-C,gu, �� F�2. Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) ? �/U / Qua' Svc 14 To Aj T G,Mj D /I Comments: //�r _ [ z)Fs�,�lod5� 11/sI- /iV Reviewer's Signature ,� TOTAL ?< REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: V, 0 -� _ Reviewer: P41 Date: 3 Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. of work to be done 25 0 -Understanding Experience with similar kinds of work 20 S Quality of staff for work to be done 20 / Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Z Cost t4u,4L bi Jam- V ? 10 -Format/Organization 10 S Total 100 jp Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation), Comments: .01.t T TOTAL �o `l Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: 4 /�— Reviewer: �.' vi.- Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 25 `3 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 i 7 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Cost 10 Format/Organization 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: Reviewer's Signature �&If Vie;. TOTAL --� Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures - 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: F�_t4P, 4' Reviewer:__ e/�2C�LS Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date• �3 Understanding of work to be done 20 O Experience with similar kinds of work 25 / Quality of staff for work to be done 20 / Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 d Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments:: �7f / l TOTAL Reviewer's Signature REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: l Cr't� Date: VT Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 zz Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 2 0 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 y Cost 2• — 00 \.-c 44-- 10 b Format/Organization 10 Total 100 $ Unique Qualities (Intan ibles): (Explanation) C--s IM Comments: AI W �wti 9CLt LQ--- R"re. < L TOTAL S Reviewer's Signature sIS Contract Administrator's Initials Date REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: �J Reviewer: Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 2 3 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 l ' Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 f f) Cost 10 Format/Organization Total 10� 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation): Y' : �-r Comments: TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures -15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consulta Reviewer::/r��C_C,�f A) Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: / Understanding of work to be done ' 20 / Experience with similar kinds of work 25 ZZ Quality of staff for work to be done 20 / Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) N� c/Q&r17iu Comments: �►/�� �,v�� ��G���� 3 A)7-5 11 Anlr6/fl✓b il/ar s7a pep TOTAL 66 Reviewer's Signature 4,,Zk REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: L<-!\,Qk�r� (j Reviewer: Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 X Experience with similar kinds of work 20 10 of staff for work to be done 20 gy _QuaRty Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 r Cost Zle- 2c45 1 Vr 10 9 Format/Organization 10 9 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles (Explanation) _P M Comments: SW $ t JA, ( + c - 0UZ DLN 2 i TOTAL00:3- Reviewer's Signature SAI Contract Administrator's Initials Date REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Servicers� Consulta r Reviewer:ya Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date' el-02 Understanding of work to be done 25 Z3 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 9 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 ll Cost 10 Format/Organization 10 `1 Total 100 Unique Qualities Intangibles): (Explanation) „ �•j;Jf, a sL.! r�C d zit! f, d(0 co-{ fF �J fCi �CJ Comments: try Reviewer's Signature TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures -15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization -10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: 74O(V Reviewer: ��� Date- 1913 har Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 11!> Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Es Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Cost A � -(� - ct v 10 Format/Organization 10 Total 100 2 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) C&-I] J ase, Comments: r" 1 �Cw� Wriq I_ VOL. 1 Reviewer's Signature 6�� � TOTAL 'I Z_ Contract Administrator's Initials Date REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consul Reviewer: ?e C Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 20 19 Experience with similar kinds of work 25 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 7 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) A,/�c ;! g4 ovATv� " ,,V,,W ,nu�u � s i�J1d Comments:Ler';Ln- 6K-- c-,OA G52t-� lle�l/wCe-I. TOTAL 8 Reviewer's Signature --r"J REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: P_) ('4% Date: ` 0 Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 25 2�1 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 19 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 l<? Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Cost 10 Format/Organization Total 10 100 C� Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: D C V r.* TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures - 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization -10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services S Reviewer: ////G'2C4f Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 20 / Experience with similar kinds of work 25 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 Format/Organization 10 Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 6 Total 100 8 / NP 'cr)- 2�wuy oNry C u ?ry Y,09--1 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) S%rj Comments: 1(10 �j�✓f�nn % hAL-2 C ��9� �%S� C ill �Sia..1 uN�c M — eW G r t /1CUiJ& . TOTAL . fz Reviewer's Signature REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: f ba,,4_ _ 2 f�e*_j 5S OG. Reviewer: �' v Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: 64-11-7L Understanding of work to be done 20 1Qa Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 [Z Format/Organization 10 10 Total 100 r Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) U. Mt% Comments: Reviewer's Signature ,I" =06001M ,� �. a.�, ewe. � �-i V►ti Y� V Eli TOTAL 7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: 1q_ L& Understanding of work to be done 25 20 Experience with similar kinds of work 20 /C_ Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures Cost 15 10 Format/Organization 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intan ibles): (Explanation) il C.=;0. i kr'zo,"I� an- 5o. Comments: �, TOTAL Reviewer's Signature A-f, Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures - 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consulta Reviewer: X 5. Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 20 S Ex erience with similar kinds of work 25 ,149 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 16) Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 �— Format/Organization 10 Z Unique Qualities (Intangibles) 10 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: /.G c-� TOTAL Reviewer's Signature REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: t 1 Understanding of work to be done 25 19�r Experience with similar kinds of work 20 Quality of staff for work to be done 20 Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 ' Z Cost 10 _ Z Format/Organization 10 8 Total 100 7 Unique Qualities (Inta (Explanation) --,�wbri y Comments: ! ' pfi Q r'c2 r� TOTAL I ( Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION On -Call Traffic Engineering Consultant Services Consultant: Reviewer: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 25- Experience with similar kinds of work 20 i Quality of staff for work to be done 20 /y Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15 b Cost 10 Format/Organization 10 S Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) ;;r, 'r1- !vox { _�f 2 & rn i Comments: li�d� �'xt5"7f/� 5?Gi'le <10 �'`-`r TOTAL Co Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Experience with similar kinds of work - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures - 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience 5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work. 11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience. Cost of Services - 10 points maximum Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project.