3813�w °
CHAPMAN
GOLF DEVELOPMENT'
-�
December 30, 2002EIVED
City of La Quinta — Public Works DEC 3 1 2002
Attn:. Victor
78-495 Calle Tampico PUBLId RCRKS xf
La Quinta, CA 92253
Re: Arnold Palmer's Restaurant Fv
-,
Grading Permit
Dear.Victor,
'
At your request we have reviewed the Prerequisites for Grading Permit Issuance
Checklist and below is the status of each item:
1: Environmental Study is enclosed: '
2. Archaeological Monitor Contract is enclosed.
#, ,y ..
3:' Approved Project Concept may be obtained from Fred Baker in Planning.
4. Compliance with special prerequisite Conditions of Approval tied to, grading' Tf
. ; t
has been completed.
v
5. Approved grading plan and soils report. This information is located in Public'
n,
Works. The original Soils Report No. 544=1076, dated April 12, 2001 was !
Provided to Public Works and a copy has been enclosed. 3 _
6. Third party approval(s) for offsite grading is not applicable
'
7. Third party approvals) for acceptance of drainage is not applicable.
'
8. Approved Fugitive Dust (PM10) Mitigation Plan has been completed and,
submitted to Public Works.
. 9. Approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is not applicable' -
r
for sites smaller than five acres.
r.
Af-
78505 Old
Avenue 52 t La Quinta, CA 92253 • Office: 760-564-3355 Fax: 760-564-2356
:i .. V�, •' .. .. - -s - - fir. Y'' ,. }, `'r , + .. eT to +� 1 '.f•i t� ` �Ys _,z
5 + .. w ac � M " r — - t : J .'+ 6 f i`` W 1 + a �• ' ., z
r10. ' 1NPDES'General Permit, Notice of Intent (NOI) is not applicable for sites
small than five acres., -
'I L `List of Professionals '• t e, i F' k, F r
Surveyor:
7 The Keith Companies' ,(760) 346-9844
`. Soils Engineer/Technologist •' - , -VE
RECEI
�y
' Sladden Engineering (71,4)+523'0952x'
Archaeological' Monitor x . '.. ' , �, , Fl '
Michael Brock (909) 784/3051 :J ,
PUSS.@C VORKS<.
°` = 12. Application for Grading Permit is attached `'
F: a T
13: ' t,Insurance Certificate is enclosed.
14: _ City Business License is enclosed.
FEES &DEPOSITS;
15. '.Basic Fees
'•r
a., Plari Checking fees paid -to date are $4,200:
� F ,
s ' , b. Grading Permit Fee in the amount of $9;942:57 is'enclosed i n ,
Summaryof the 'GradingPermit Fee: .
Total 'Grading' Contract 271;452.25
Multiplied by 3%" , 8;143.57 •
Less plan check fees of $4,200, already paid. 3,943.57. ,"
Plus As Built Security Deposit of $1;000 4,943.57,' • # -
Fugitive Dust Control'Securit4
y Deposit of $4,999 9,942.57
. .1 yY . , >. ' .�r - • - ., r _ 47.•.R, T " Y:qr K l.•• • �!
16. Fringe -toed Lizard Fee does not apply to this project..'` µ L
, 0.1 As -Built plan security deposit of $1,000 is included in;the Grading Permit
n ` Fee.
18. Fugitive Dust Control Security Deposit of $1,000 per acre (4.99 acres) is n
' included in the Grading Permit Fee. k ="
.. r
• c:
' .
� .
�.
1
.• ..
,. . .
..
. ,..
.. '.
..
• � t
• -
•,
� � � � �.
.,
•.,
- •- • �
�. "
' t if 1
- - - ,:i v�.t�'a* s, Wk,�„n,'
"
If you have any questions or need additional
information, please,do not'hesitate to contact - +
r
. . .
me at (760) 564-3355 or Richard Wasserman at (760).578-1405
r
'
Sincerely,,+ !
♦, F: x
to
Chiistina J. Capetz
w
Project Manager
H Lr
!v _ �� +• ♦ Y ♦.�.
. +i f I ,F �t
�f".
;! •.
_ /c,^�
"
"
u y'. .Y' a�.-.S
p
• -
Enclosures
� � 1 �, ' :-
_ � .
. • .��
��� � ,�
UsUr
,'
'
- .i •.
♦ � �•
�
'tie"
?
.
•. ,\
, ikf'
�,''
}.• -k
T a
41 of
�''
H, •. %•-•'��' _ i ..t..
a,
• • •
. - '�'�'• ,`
�i J � f
\ f•
�' f •, • jl
"� t
'� .
� r •per e'
-
f
14
I . V 1 • CJ 1
• ' .r..: ..,� TE (
... •..' ",) .. a' <•.. , •'' >siyr G,...,Y, ;tor. I :'I ' DAb! DDA'Y)
calrE 'oF gal t � t, i� :u wcE: 12=0
r
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED'AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HRH Ins Sery of So California
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
Ucense Number 0684503
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
77-664 Country Club Dr, 9401
Palm Desert CA 92211
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
•
COInPaHY
.
A NIC Insurance/AES
INSUFEO
COMPANY
'
Sun Vista Development Corp
B State Fund
P.O. Box 1144
COMPANY
La Ouinta CA 922530000
C
COMPANY
D
I
COVERAGES .:: ..: . ; •: ':ia%�•. ,.�.,'' ' '
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF {NSURANCE LIS7Eti 6ELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSt.IAE7 NAMED A60VE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWIT:. iSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION
OF AN`r CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WrrH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIEEO HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLJSIONS AND CONOITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTA
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE jMd1fDONV)
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE IMI.IJLDNY)
LIMITS
A
CEI'JERAL
LIASILI'rY
PEND I W3
12,12802 02
12 i 28103 ,,
GENERAL AGGREGATE
S
2 , 000 , 000
X
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
PRODUCTS • CQMPCP AGG
S
2.000, 000 I
CLAIMS MADE D OCCUR
PERSONAL 6 ADV INJURY
S
1,000,000
X
OWNERS & CONTRACTOR'S,PROT
EACH OCCURRENCE
1,000.000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire)
S
50,000
MED EXP (Any one ocnm)
1
5,000
AUTOM051LE.
UABBILITY
ANY AUTO
COMBINED SIN3LE UNIT
S
ALL OWNED AUTOS
3CHEDULED AUTOS
eODILY IWJRY
(Per pe,.on)
1
BODILY INJUAY
(Per accidenq
S
HLgED AUTOS
NON. WNE0 AUTOS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
S
GARAGE LIA24UTY
AUTC ONLY • EA ACCIDENT
S
CTHER THAN AUTC ONLY:
ANY AUTO -
-
EACH ACCIDENT
S '
AGGREGATE
S
EXESS LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
S
AGGREGATE
S
UJA3RcLLA FCRM
OTHER THAN LMORELLA FORM
S
B
COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LA
THE PRCFRIETOR: INCL
PA,RTA'ERS; EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE: EXCL
229.0020714.03
01/01/03
01/01/04
TH•
TW , •
UV/ORK=hS
EL EACH ACCIDENT
S
1.000,000
EL DISEASE • POLICE' LIMIT
S
1 . 000 , 000
EL DISEASE ' EA EMPLOYEE
S
1,000.000
OTHER
C S IP—IOU OF OPFiATIOtJSiLOCATtOIJSJVEHICLESJSPECIAL ITEMS
R :,Talmer Restaurant
Certificate holder is named as additional insured
Fax .1564-2356
CERTIFICATE HOLDER „ ;' .: :,
'`a
t:ELLATi01J``'. '
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE CESCR19ED POLICES BE CANCELLED eEFOAE THE
The Traditions'
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
AM: Christina
30 DAYS 1VAITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAIJEO TO THE LEFT.
7350S Old Ave. 52 -
Le Quinta . CA 92253
GUT FAILURE TO UAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPA SENTATIVES.
'
AUTHORI
4EFMa'SE'#U(i
.1503': 0AACOCORPOFIATION:1988
ww TOTAL PAGE.01 w*
DEC-30-2002 14;21 760 360 4799 95% P.01
• "
'
f � • 11dt,y •. ''F%
'
'`S•I
`t�.s .. F•yr. jr Tr
dIA
r . lr
Dec
24 02. 04: 44p CRM-iT,ECH 9097842987 ' ,.�� t '
p, 2 � j
f � j. ram` .��•,
}
' _ -- Yt r �� � t- + r ' ~, y .•
_ i �_,.,
CRM TECN
`•.
4472 Orange Street
. Riverside, CA 92501: '."�t}1'<° . •
"•
December 24, 2002'
+
Christina Capetz . _` ; ,t l , h -' y
1Y
1r,
•
La Quinta Restaurant Groupty(l
i
78-505 Old Avenue 52 r'' T''
i
�., La Quinta, CA 92253
- f COST,PROPOSAL AND SCOPE OF WORK
,= i7tr
F
. a'Archaeological Monitoring Program �� •'
_
Proposed Arnold'Palmer's Restaurant'Project
' At the Northeasf`Corner of Avenue 52.and Desert Club Drive
yt
t Iri the:City of La Quinta;'Riverside County
'
At the request of Christina Capetz of the La Quinta Restaurant Group ("Client"), CRM TECH is�
a
„'t•
, •submitting this cost proposaI , scoOe of,work concerning archaeological monitoring during
—
earth -moving at the proposedArnold Palmer's Restaurant project site located at the northeast
corner of the intersection of Avenue 52 and Desert Club Drive in -the City of La Quinta,
Riverside County, California. `The monitoring is required by the City of La Quints (Lead
_ Agency) and will be perfornied.under_ provisions of the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance ,.
Sand the California Environmental Quality Act'(CEQA). -
l
r
Statement of Needs and'Scope of Work
-
The Client requests that excavation and/or other earth -moving operations on the subject
-
r -
property be monitored by a qualified archaeologist as per City requirement. An order to satisfy
..
the Client's needs, CRM TECH proposes to accomplish the following tasks:
`
"
".
1• Provide on -site monitoring dring clearing, grubbing, grading, trenching and/or other earth-
moving operations; if cultui•aI resources are encountered during grading, the archaeologist
f -
shall have the power to _teihi Lorarily halt or divert work in that area until the finds are
-
'
recovered;
1
•
_
' '• 2.. Identify, record; recover artd:evaluate all subsurface artifacts, features, or sites discovered
during monitoring, if any;,•.11 .<...
• :' 31' Catalogue and analyze ail;:artifacts recovered during monitoring, if any, and arrange for. their
permanent curation at an appropriate facility;,, y -
'
:•x
4.Consult with Native'American representatives and/orlocal historical societies in ttie event
I•
f significamt archaeolog cal -findings; " '
' `' 4
.
5. Complete site Fecord(s):orisite.record updates and submit to Eastern Information Center at
' l
UCR;
•• �, ,
6" Analyze and intecpret the,aprepate a final report_ to document the results of the.
_
• ...procedures of the monitoring.program �¢
t
Cost Proposal
... _s,y..:;
CRM TECH proposes to complete the tasks listed above at a•flat rate of $55 per hour for the , -
•,
..
'
lead archaeologist and $40 per hour for additional,personhel if needed. - Hours beyond eight per,
^
'
day and /or forty per week:.will•be,billed at an overtime rate of $80 per hour for the lead,
a
• '
archaeologist and $60 per hour;for additional personnel: Asa rule of thumb, one archaeologist-.
^ : can safely and effectively,monitor,six'scrapers if they are working u1 the same area. If more : - . •
, ,
than six scrapers are used, or earthmoving equipment is Working at separate locales, additional
t i
monitors may be needed. If ,unexpectedly important finds are uncovered, additional personnel
'
will be required to salvage the items with a minirr um -of delay.to•the'project. a�
-. r
,,
Tet..,(909)'784 3051 Fax (909) 784-2987-• «. -
'"'Deo• 24 02 04: 44p CRh1TECH •}: 9097El42987
r p
'`r! .... - � .�� 3 I+.idµ•, c r f ., � 4: ��-
. • i 3 '1. ' _' '��,' `i n A :. a -/l ' - - • S y , 7, t t,;�
• .,. �l _ - �{ in }'` ,,. ,r - . 4.� `F.y +`/`
n. ,•, pit ..:' .. f,t - .". ,. -. =f - : r Y, •'�, { '+''
1 In addition to the time spentm the field monitoring the earth -moving; time and'effort are also �r
needed to process and cat" logue'"all recovered artifacts; if any (item # 3,�above),' complete site+
records and/or site i•ec6i&.updates if artifacts are found (item # 5, above), and arialyz ' and
' } interpret the data and preparC4 final report for the project (item # 6, above). The extent of
• these efforts depends mostly on the number and type of cultural resources found during -
monitoring and can not be predicted, but will be discussed with the client''These tasks will also
be billed at a flat rate of $55�per hour.' Finally, upon completion of the final report, the Client'! ,
will be presented with opiio�ns 'and their costs, for the curation of the. recovered artifacts. It'is ,:
understood, therefore, that the fVVl mount of the archaeological moniton—ng program, as outlined above; - 4i q
bar
' depends oil the number of daysigmonitoring earth -moving activities and the amount of ;time needM to
catalogue atid'anaIyze Ehe finds;r'rf any, and write the reports. '
Note: if a buried archaeological site' is exposed during grading that requires'an extended t•
mitigation effort, such an effar`t would require a new proposal for mitigating the impacts to the
resource, including a new scope of work and budget.
' Payment Schedule
.. -Invoices for services shall be submitted on or about the 1st'and the 15th of each month. s }
�
• '�+ ,• ' i1 fix_ C' • - � _ - .. ��
/ Agreement
'• ' y �� If the Client agrees to the terms and conditions of this proposal, an authorized signature below
• will constitute a contract and,ari,agreenient.to proceed,
Submitted by:
4 ' 6 L r•i- - , ^.i • 2 ,` r - TZ `lY'll!I a
Michael Hogan
- CRM TECHIT V
cr
YN
` Agreed to:*zol
{' a •! � f
•�' .. r' Print name and title - re, ,° .a Date
•. POST-.O.F.yFICE SOX -10361 !A IQUINTA, CALIF.ORNLA 9225
1 • t .
r •vt"1L�IJl3.E t SdKlL'a:Y l (C%0.), 77-1 ♦i 695
• • -�, PIY i .t •r �t i t p i
•
NO
._ _ =f •� 4
' r, 't
fl/�� I1
t
of ' ( `.� ' .+vim 'I,
+
♦ .�T
, ♦
�
beceif
♦
• a 's.
, f �� 3
i r.
, .
P.O. Bo,x'1144
• t
7�
La QuI ila,: CA 52253. - '. w.... a .` ,. ' ` a -' •5 ' ' t� 4a•
` y � 1•- , I ' ti. s.. y
•
Fax. (360)-7-7-1-4922 . x+ ;, y t
- •", is
p
,�
fTvjw annomow,: ,yppppB.. • '
f4Y.. 65vs� 1w .A P/DLVYCW. 1' 'iieii-t" fib`.. ♦ . t `
AIM wnta
• �
1
♦
"
�`r
•..
�' . vow' Sf - try Ordbr. €o: inG. Some Of a
-pm
.rN_n�±►'i� ��9{"£:'p11�1_!�
' '-` �
• 5 .±♦• .,
{y� ��•QLR'�f.�4f�a(�;Ct���dgtltl�lj�.@,{9�y/q�1[pSygQy.r{�p3�(�� {L5y'����fL�ytpT�ly�f.��!'?�
li'.aCGo wW R!vb f,-.%V•i ri-q VCV[i, ks: wW �haW,ng .. r rN
•~ .. -^.
'. Ir , y f .s
'
I Dem and: haut away curt, .gutter aril sk f�tiis acqcordlr ° to:gradir�g f�: ;y
>
1 _
i Deffm -and hauf.away a Grxt"bdY .557-if of lac=wall
i GE. 6R@Sd�'Ad7.• "y
R 7 r• -Y•i.
•
rh '
1
f
1 y•
'
../f '
•
t`
. Cmstruct.3- of:A.-C.:€ avement oar 4 112" of:
6' t srtcr ta' Fiaent at ash ens to ° aui wrl3 '
,�'
2,
i - 'Y '4"3T ( �
sv vT•rcc.n vt t'vaiaz ��,wzFsf�;t'cz�iJiieoO�'yk'ttd�flSLfii L�4�1'�t� '�'
� :�J.�i .
"$�.5t�(�. •I
•����G�(1.�?
8s8 Mb
�
/ u
J t
:�i
'► x
.6i° tv ii f3 ..-'C�np?ou'•1tV.:Ag4�atnre(ef 4'TTl lb711e§ •----S�—etR-----Tz
e..�rts._.rc
type A=60curb.'& rluftr per County of fter
$14.Q�Q~
: 1,I75.:
$15,.450.Uf�
6` fide sly ring • ` Gtalntj of r'
�2.75
--5:w
L5!R *40114p4 1
t
• i
an s
r+
r
_
•_ < -
� ,�• .�"` � �a��! y
a r. _'' � ♦'
"' F you �• �
h
1 ,
�'
' ;
_ A. Fibres Excavating_and Grading Inc.
. .,. ,''� `F'
'►
Palmers Restaurant Bid .
= , , k '�:
„ ,
, •
.3,7.7
,. s. •
l�ivr't5iefe
$4.50
5.00
-
10' wide P C,C cross gutters per County
of
.
STD.#209
4
Curb at spandrel per County,of•itiverside
STD.#209
$7.75 ti;
3550
,
. '
of Riverside
$3.75 a'
225
41 wide P.C.C. cross gutter per County
-
STD_#209 modified
yA
4" thick P.C.C: walkway, over'V of class
II mate base
$4.25
4,260
$18,105.00
,
wid lab
bisabied access ramp per iverside County
STD,. #403 —
$500.00
2 �
$1,000.00;,,
_
,* r.
a
voe
4.
' -
Disabled access ramp. pei RWerside County
STD. #403 —
$600.00
2
$1,200 00
.
a r
'$437:50
P.C. Concrete 6".rip rap fined swaie
per. section A as
$17.50 -
25
.',', . r �r•
shown on -detail on sheet 4
.a
55
2" sand Duel 6 mil visoueen
(unit
f
ce r
:Install class IIyba� under flatwork if
needed
$ i
r'
rroe S
,
• a ,a
*, y
a. Exclusions: ImpOrt/F.xpori of fill dirt
(Site to laalanoe),ater meter, Perkts/f�ees of any kind, PM 10,
ai3er hours, holidays, weekends dust control. Solis besting, Staking, Unknown buried conditions,
Construction fence
� Project io fe a Re ld lured upon progrew Inva" and grill be billed accordingly. �
•` -
• ,
•. • •.. JAY •
1 L. •'y
^ • ,1' '. " \' ' £
,
,
.
�r •�.�,•t
t'L,
•, M•
• it
�'•
•'' - .y,• r-• ' -
� ,.+ • ♦ .. •_ yi ,
1
i
'
r r or
1•
a
a r
... ,-,
i ,
' y +`i
���
V+. : '' • - 4't • , . ,r
..
•
a- , • ,• •' .
- Ir y
t •A.
S
`
., `•
•
r
t'
* ,t • I'. j
w r'
, s . .ai
T
a
•
kD
A).
. :N�NTRpidSFEFABLE t�
` ::ER1FICp`�
*j .7 ��gd licensee to s
L�C�I e WTI Is lte�ti" yzntad phis Ucen'"3. .. BER.' .
ss A Q1} 13 tty. tdUCA
5� .... >: O� .�, li tuo 2 ottr; slitiorna 3
C�` R. 3llteeai��reds��rdt�an. tt�a.stateofV Q�3S
aam N vr11b tins. ProN m ti a rs'a,g by
t
Re
°t : nat d rercu� h VO d'stateQ.+^ 9 Me
10 cr zxen�P
stipi. S
SlV3 r_ 0-, s rein L�ttitt verification lti-at �e lip nsvt .2
r
witnovt SUITE i
g2.253' � ExPtaEs�3
3T
jpCs avTN�p`� Is5uED 10/31/
PLEASE GUok3 QUA E `r
j SS UCENsE 10 E+ y OP ��+"' COW.
Bus N� IKG' COK�RA . CSRpolkNT CN s
Vu
GOE1 OL `.. DE LOEt N
sits vls�A� 1�a ^`fir. cbW _ .
Facsimile The Keith Companies
,lob No.: 40702.00.016-205
Dater. June 14, 2001 Project: Palrrier's Restaurant -
• To: Christina Dores From: James Bazua
Tradition Club Associates
Fax: (760) 564-2356 Fax: • (760.) 346-9368
CC. Pages: 1 (including this sheet) -
Re: Plan Check Fees K '
❑ (;rgcnt. ❑For approval Q For your use [Jj requested ❑ Par review
❑ Other: Y x
Christina,
The City of La Quinta requires a plan check fee of $750 per sheet for each sheet being
submitted for review.
We will be submitting a total of five sheets for review by the City, for a tota of S3750• W ,
will not be required to submit utifity.sheets to the City of La Quinta. They w o
CVWJ for review instead. Please'call if you have any questions.
I will follow up shortly with an update sheet for our work on this project.
Sincerely,
( � � James R. IIazua, 1'✓.
In
. V Project Engineer
41.8f{ Eoardwalk
sulfa tot
Palm Desert.
• calitomia 22211
t 909,346.9844
r 'If you have any problems with this fax, please call (760) 348-9844 (; 909.346.9368
www.kelthco.com
O: w0256PF& of -ad -1,apslm6m.doc
JUN-14-2021- 11:55 760 346 9768 9h P.01
{
r' ` '#'
. � `
. Y
t � : - :.
/- 1 . •A ,
• t Y � •� - f
I � 1 w � y u,.-r t d
' 'i
r •
� y.it. `. r
x - - !! �` .�. 4 i � j 1.
'
•-•Y. i
♦ •7•i_
f ',`i r
'fit".
. S 4; ^i .
tk
-
• \% tM•
' t �'6
t• 4,y+`, . � �
�
� ,
- r,
.10
ti 't"" �: C
- .. � � r, r } `
.r•a T �,�, , '; y� b. - Arr .
_
_
- - •� _
IN
.�1j. ti ti' .rya
•.
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
- • �
•:
, 'e`r•�~ F - T• 'w
^�. � F- 'tL ir. -
• � ♦ .+yam
y • t
., .
,_ = PALMER'S, RESTAURANT,
r"
+DRIVE
LOT 90-`AVENUE'52,&'DESERT CLUB
LA'QUINTACALIFORNIA
F
}•
` •� • r.� i �Y' • i —
•.�
,'tom i 3.'• ri ,. 1 F s. r .1 ��` T -i ""
)1 A x ' w � ; . M
'1
,_ �y, _
- s �.;
, '
.7
w/• .. \
K` '•may r}. _,.
,
`t
..' µ.,Y r `
f
'• _ ,N.�v ki
�y`�k .r •t* ,'.i .H•. 11. �'r
+
•�,
r at!' ii � '�`• � ` , " q .•
Sµ. • t Z , 'r i �` 4 �' �
t •i r i- „ '
`t.
`
•MT,1
• 1.
•` r .- -1
sr.
}.
1
• _'
,.,
r ..•
•r '.}. �'
7,.
r•.
i
By-
•.
-Prepared
'Sladden Engineering;
s , ,•
i. 1
39-725 Garand'Lane; Suite G.
.'. ►r
,:' Palm'Desert, G`alifornia 92211.
,•
a (760) 772-3893
� • • +
•"
t
T
.. .. ;
A
,
�
• f "
, \ { r � � � h � 1 • . \ F'
'
� 1 ` = � i �y+ 1. , .
T • -
. M
•{
r +
,Sladrlen Eneineerine
4 S1ddd'eh,'Ehg"in"e'e'rOinQr
•
,1
�6782 Stanton Ave.; Suite E, Buena,Park; CA'90621. (562) 864-4121 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369
39-725.Garand Ln., Suite G,'Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895
- April 12, 2001 Project No: 544-1076
a . arx ,? ��• 1, •i: ♦�' 4, '
,
_Tradition Golf Club;
78-5054. ld Avenue 52
'La Quinta, California' 92253 - O. K y s
Attention: `Mr. David Chapman i'-
• Project • Palmer's Restaurant
" - { NEC Avenue 52 and Desert Club Drive
,x La Quinta, California F
4 ,t j ,. t - • t .. .. •` ., �+x a e; i E,� �`Lr'xE -yrir r
Subject: , GeotechnicaLInvest1gation
- • f -'fix. .. "1. J 4 � ....
;Presented herewithlis the report of our Geotechnical Investigation conducted;at the site of the proposed` ,
Palmer's Restaurant to be located on the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and.Deser ,Club Drive in the City: -
of La Quinta, California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for,site
preparation -and to assist in foundation design "for the proposed commercial sfructur'e and the related site
improvements..
This report presents. the results -of our field investigation and laboratory testing along with conclusions, -
_ •and recommendations for.'fouindation design and site; preparation. This report completes our original
'4 ,J scope•of services as understood. •' i j _" 4 '� t,
'• r .We :appreciate the opporturiity to provide service to you on this project." If you have any questions
regarding.this report, please,contact the undersigned
Respectfully submitted, * "' �. t
•.. b ,, '
fi, SLADDEN ENGINEERING -
e �+ �pROFES{5/Q
' Brett L: Anderson "W 4�� �0�7 t ` y h` X.
' r Principal'Engineer rN6. C 45389
Exp. 9-30-2002
.'R�''• w_ .; ,'':�`a91� "1Vii.- ���i :'/ r "' t • .' r - .� b2 _ ,r- t •Z `r ..
SER/pc cA;.tro;
' Cop ies:r 4/The Tradition Golf Club, LLC
p
y 2/Keith.,Companies
_` ' ' , � - y"• .fr • �. '....fir, •*.. Fx-" •r'
J. r ,, , C/nrlilori Fnoinovrinv
pit { i ^, '. .. ^ � - ••h • ^. .. � . .. .. ","��` 1 r�. � sir, �i � �• r2 � - 7''e
3.
t GEOTECHNICAL'INVESTIGATION '�• '
` PALMERS RESTAURANT-
' LOT 90'- AVENUE 52 • ,r ,� w - �' �1 ,�;
LA QU1NTAhCALIFORNIAu
• s April l 2; 2001.
F_... ' ; • TABLE'OF CONTENTS' ,. +
INTRODUCTION......... .............•.... .................................... ....... ........... t ,
-SCOPE OF WORK° }'
PROJECT'DESCRIPTION ........:..:.`........... " ..............��>..........'...' ..+ ........
`. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.......` ................ ................. ... :. ........ ....''...... 2
.... ... ....
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...:....`..'.......t'.::........t..i.....................yF...
n2l�j g •.�! ti ,'
Foundation Design 3 z,
- ..'.........�..-'..... ' Settlements.. ........................ � .....' .... .............. c
'. Lateral Design...... _ '..�:' ............. :..... :. ". 4 �' , ' '` •'
Retaining Walls:.... .......... .................."�...........:.::...'.............................. ..:...... �4 �
...4
x ;Ex' ansiveS6ils. •...... .: .......... ..... .......... ....... ...... .... '
Concrete Slabs -on -Grade... '1..... :.:................. ' .. :..... 4s,
Soluble Sulfates 4' . • `
' •' Tentative Pavement Design . .. .............'.... ..... ... ....................... ..... ... ^ 5' . � -"`''• `, ` ,
Shrinkage and Subsidence ........ 1........... ,?................. 5
General Site Grading...:.:,. ................... .r:. ................... .. ...: 5
�.
- W . 1. Clea"ring and Grubbing ................................ ................. ... .. ....... 5 • ,.
4 ; ' 2. Preparation of Building and.Foundation Areas-...t ' ... M .. -.....:..,5 . r` * ' ' P.
.3. Preparation of Surfaces to Receive Compacted'Fill ........ ... ...... - .. :.. 'S
r y•, ,.,
�4. Placement of Compacted Fill ........:..................................... 6
• • ` ' S~Preparation of Slab and Paving Areas :... ..........� 6
6:•Testing and Inspection ......... ........................ 6 1w -
} GENERAL ,, - 6 ,r :F; '
; ... � .:....................:......' .. _... :.........., .... :F^............... '... .'.. :
r '• ;APPENDIX A ' "Site Plan, and Bo"ririg Logs ' •j x y ,' $ '`'' j . ,
• Field •Exploration ; .�• - �. �: i.
F AP_ PENDIX,B ` Laboratory`,Testing y
Laboratory Test Results
APPENDIX C - 1997•UBC Seismic Design Criteria' r=
it •n' .. '� ' 5i- .• _ �' .• • ' ; ' tt' f � ♦ it R� <, �' +-rI a
s r . j��r` it •i� K ' � � ` :. , •Z �, r ~� � ''' -:t ,, •�Y
' ' • +,.`"1. -�' •` � � ti .,'a. ;r r - Y � .¢ r it . c 4 .. .� • ' • i'% � '� 'SF � ' ' e R.i,.
• t _ r
-j'' ` v . „ ^ - • ape * ` • " . l , '� , { f
,:4` !j*• . VR ' t F• J'I- •. a .AT . ' T• ` - ,' , i..r •. i Y I ♦ - 1T
' April 12 2001 ;a' ' a' =1- - • + Project No 54471076.
176*
INTRODUCTION •��
This report presents the results. of our Geotechnical. Investigation performed :in .order to;provide .
recommendations for site preparation and the design and constriction of the foundations for the proposed • ,
Palmer's Restaurant building.,.TThe project site is located on the northeast corner of Avenue 52 and,Desert;,
Club Drive just north of'the'Trad.ition Golf Club in -the City of La Quinta; California.. The preliminary
' 'plans indicate that: the" proposed, project will .include a restaurant and •..various: associated site
`..improvements::The'associated site, improvements -are -expected to,includ6 paved driveways,and parking
•, 4 lots, -,concrete walkways and patios, landscape areas and various underground utilities. f
'h r SCOPE'OF WORK „ • . '
The purpose of'our investigation was to determine'certain engineering characteristics.;of the near surface }
;soils -on the site in order to deJelop`recommendations for fouridat�on design and site; preparation. Our '
investigation included. field'exploration;, laboratory testing,'engineering analysis and the "preparation of
,this report. Evaluation of environmental issues or hazardous wastes 'Nvas not within the'scope of services.' i
provided. 'Our investigation wasperformed in accordance with contemporary geotechnical-engineering�
principles and practice. We make no other warranty, either express or implied.'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
,The, project site is located on the'north side of Avenue'52 just east of Desert Club Drive,in the City'of La `
Quinta, California: The project site inclbdes a triangular shaped "parcel' identified as Lot 90,along with
„j three'small residential lots along Desert Glib Drive. The preliminary plans indicate that the project will
n include a restaurant .along'with various associated site improvements: - It is our understanding -that the
.. , proposed structures wily be -of relatively lightweight wood -frame construction and will be supported by'
conventional 'shallow spread footings,and concrete slabs.on grade. Tlie associated site improvements will,
►, " include paved' driveways and.parking•areas, concrete walkways.and patios, landscape areas and various
r underground,utilities: i y • _ r
s • ',.The majorityof the project site is presently vacant but there is an existing residence located on lot 2 along,
Desert Club Drive,.•�The remainder of the property is covered.with scattered' desert, short grass, weeds and
,• minor debris. Desert Club Drive and.Aven66 52 are'.paved adjacent -to the site. Thereis an existing block { .
' ? wall along the north property botanda_y. There,are;existing overhead and underground utilities along the
existing streets "an d property Imes.
A `'Based upon our previous experience with -lightweight: wood -frame structures, we expect that isolated .-
column loads.will be less than 30 kips and wall loading will,be less than to-3.0 kips per linear foot. A site
"plan prepared by The Keith Companies was utilized for oiir irivestigation.".,Grading is expected to,include
relatively minor cuts and fills to match the nearby elevations and to construct a slightly elevated building
r - pad to:accommodate site drainage. This does not include removal and recompaction Hof the foundation
«" bearing soils within. the building areas. If the anticipated foundation•, loading or site grading varies
substantially from that assumed;•the recommendations included in this report should be reevaluated. '
•�+. t . '. fit.+;.' • � •y i , r. , ':�•�+ ... `• - • +.a. ` i. a / ..
' ..? S„ ��n!%llnN T+•N AINOOTINO,
• r t,• - .. -
�•
4;
Y ».• • ... r f` , t .' M, ': f a '• C'
__}. -
' • 'April 12, 2001 ` -2- f Project No` 544-1076
n-s ,
-01-04-176
• s . :r x .. a +' ' _. .. � ,r � 1. V. �Y'• . •. .ri.H.�•
`' k .'Y
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ,' t. w•
;�
The near surface soils observed'within our borings consist primarily of fine-grained silty sands and sandy
clayey silts. The soils.withiri the upper 2 to 3 feet consisted primarily of sandy clayey silts but fine
_ >•
- grained silty'sands were the most prominent soil type observed within our boring's. The'site soils were
•± > . fairly consistent in compositioii but somewhat inconsistent in stratigraphy within our borings. In general;
4 `
=' the site soils appeared somewhat loose throughout the depth of our borings but laboratory test results and
i
` `sampler penetration' resistance (as•measured by field blowcounts), suggest that'tlie site soils become
` somewhat' firiner with.depth� Relatively undisturbed samples indicated dry, density�varyi'ng'from'82 t'
- "
100 pcf. '-The site.soils were found'to besomewhatdry•throughout the depth of our borings. Moisture
=
.r
content vary ing"frorn, 0.5 to 5.3,percent was determined for the samples obtained.+:1 7
L$bo'ratory classification testing indicates that the near surface soils consist primarily, of a somewhat+
inconsistent combination of sandy,clayey silts and very silty fine-grained sands. -Expansion testing
;
' indicates that the'majority of the near surface soils are considered non -expansive and.fall within the "very,
: "= • y .
low" expansion tcategory 'in accordance with - the Uniform Building ,Code classification system.
} Consolidation testing .indicates that: the near surface -sandy silts and -silty sands' are potentially
t compressibleandmay be susceptible to hydroconsolidation and/or compression related settlements: .y
;
Groundwater was iiot'" encountered within . our borings .'that extended .'to a : maximum depth` of
k -' "approximately 50 feet below the existini ground surface. Groundwater should not be.a factor in
r
foundation design or construction' .
f
4=�}.
•• � ,` . -• �-i •`, F -..I ..1' . �
it `*+'+..F . ..
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
' �'.
,-
Y
' (.Based our .field and laboratory ;inves'tigation, it •is our opinion that the proposed .residential
• r �.;
_upon,
' development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in
this report are considered in building foundation des ign`and site preparation. Due to the'somewhat loose
"' • and compressible conditions of the near surface- soils, remedial grading including overexcavation and
_ -
' :•recompaction�is recommen`ded, for the proposed; building `areas. We recommend that remedial' grading
"within the proposed building areas include overexcavation and recompaction of the primary foundation
'bearing soils.. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site.Gradirig section of.`'
.
this report..~'
'Groundwater was not encountered within our borings that extended to a depth of approximately 50 feet '
below the existing ground surface. ,Due to the Aepth to groundwater;. specific liquefaction analyses were
�•; 'uefaction
�..P
-t
n t erf upon depth -to groundwater the potential for li and the related
o rmed. 'Based o
o B s q
surficial affects of liquefaction impacting the site_'are considered negligible.
,The , site is located, within an active seismic area of Southern -California within approximately 12.5
.. ny .kilometers of,the San Andreas Fault system. Strong ground motion• resulting from earthquake activity
'
along -the, nearby San Andreas or San Jacinto fault, systems ,is likely to impact the site during the
5»
:-anticipated Iifetime!of"the structure. Structures -should be --designed by professionals familiar with the
;geologic'acid seismic setting of the site. As a minimum, structure design should conform ,to Uniform
Building Code (UBC) requirements for Seismic Zone 4. Pertinent seismic design criteria as outlined 'in
' the 1.997 UBC, is summarized in Appendix C of this report.
IA
'irk ' :. ! ! • ` � ", � a*.r, F. i' }>: � . �__'� . i
ti April 12; 2001 `-3- r '' Y Project'No. 544-4
1076
1-:0110
Caving did occur to 'varying,degrees within each of'our exploratory borings and the surface soils may be `
susceptible to'caving within•deeper excavations. All excavations should be'constructed in accordance"
with' the" normal • CalOSHA excavaiion criteria. On the basis of our observations'of-the materials,"
encountered, we anticipate that the subsoils will conform to those described by CalOSH, as Type B or C. .:,,•,
c. .
Soil conditions should be verified�in th" field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor..'
The ,majority of the surface soils encountered during our investigation,,were.found to be generally non'.
.,expansive:Laboratory testing.indicated an Expansion Index of 7 for the near surface sandy silts and,.0-for
• . „ the silty sands;,;which correspond 'with ;.the'"very. low" expansion category'inlaccordance.with_•UBC -
`" • " �'- Standard 18-2.. If imported soils are to be used during grading, they should have an-Exp
xpansion Index;of
{. less than 20.
' The following recommendations present more detailed design criteria, .which have been developed on the
basis'of our field and laboratory investigation. , F• w• a „'
Foundation Desi n: -The results.of our investigation: indicate.that either conventional shallow'.:.
• continuous footings:or isolated pad footings, that are supported upon' properly compacted'soils, ,.- .
` `, • - may. be' expected to -,provide satisfactory' support for' the proposed: resid•eniial. structures.
`r, + Overexcavation and recompaction'should be perfor.med,as•deschbed in the Site Grading Section
of this report., ' ' ,�..r, +�
Footings'shbuId extend at least 12 inches beneath lowest~ adjacent grade. Isolated �square. or
3r
`• rectangular'footings at least 2'feet square 'may be designed •using- an'allowable bearing value of 4,.:jz ' _"-
• 1800 pounds per square.foot:.Continuous'footirigs at least 12,inches wide i•nay.be designed using I
an allowable bearing•value of 1500 pounds per square foot: Allowable increases'of 200 psf for
each additional ]foot of width'and 250 psf for each additionah 6 inches of depth may be utilized`
if desired. The maximum allowable bearing pressure should be 2500 psf.' The allowable bearing
'pressures: are for dead;and frequently a pplied,live.loads and,may be.,increased by 1/3•to'resist;,;
wind, seismic or other transient loading. '` '� * . - • .,^�
Care shouldbe taken to see that bearing soils are not allowedto;become saturated from the, t »•.
�ponding- oflrainwater; or irrigation. Drainage_ from .the building: areas should 'berapid and;
complete.
The recommendations made in the preceding paragraphs are based .on the assumption that all'
1 footings will,be supported upontproperly'compacted soil. All grading shall be performed under
y r• �' the testing and inspection of tlie'Soils Engineer or•his representative. Prior to the placementof
>-, concrete; we recommend that the footing -excavations be inspected in order to verify that they -
commend
' • �" 'extend into compacted 'soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. �,. *:'., '
i„ ry .' ?
:• Settlements: Settlements•may result from the anticipated foundation loads. These estimated
4; f ;•''';,• �" ultimate settlements .are'calUdated,to be a maximum'of I. inch when using the recommended �'. £•
'bearing values. As'a'practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as
t one-half of the total settlement. ,� -,•r. r ,, r "' '"
ti +'
n
r r r
• °.. � s � '. ' . `� ' `1 ,. - ' :� QlnlJr7n.o o-Fi'nni.ii�nrir.n • - •� '.
1. `+
�t* • ' `."
,
{ l'�* , _ _ .
# i. 4` ems. �,` ' A .. .ter
`
V
,April 12, 2601�' -4- - '{; Project No 544-1076 ,.
Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads rriay, be -provided by a combination of friction acting
at the .base~ of'the'•slabs'or foundations and passive earth`.!pressure• along the. sides^of the,
,foundations.' A coefficient of friction of 0.42 between soil and concrete may be used with dead"
load forces only. A passiveearth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot; perfoot of depth,�may :,' •s' i;
be used for,the sides of footings, which are poured against properly compacfed.natiwe4soils. +_
Passive earth,pressure'should be ignored within the upper 1 foot except•where confined (such as •• 'L' '
beneath a`floor slab). When used in combination, either the passive resistance or the coefficient '
Y'
of friction should be reduced by one-third'. '
,.
Retaining Walls: Retaining,.walIs.may be required to accomplish' proposed construction.''
'
Cantilever retaining walls may be designed using "active" pressures. Active pressures may be Ar
' *
estimated using an equivalent fluid -weight of 35 pcf for native .backfill' soils with level free-
''
draining-backfillconditions.-
•
r
', For walls that are restrained, "at rest" pressures•should'be utilized, irr'desigri.' At rest pressures
. M
r
may be estimated using an,equivalent fluid weight oft55:pcf for native backfill,soils'with level r .y
'+T
free -draining backfill conditions.
♦ .
Expansive Soils: Due to the prominence -of non -expansive soils on the site, specialsexpansive
soil design criteria should not`be necessary for the,design of foundations'and concrete slabs -on- `
' grade: Because the mixing and blending associated.withahe recommended'remedial grading may.
I
• i r.
change' expansion potential, final design criteria should be established by the Structural Engineer
' -
-based upon post grading expansion test results.
Concrete Slabs4--:Grade:; All surfaces to.receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain'
.r
= by recompacted `soils as described in the Site Grading Section:of this report. Where'slabs are to,
"
receive moisture'sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor 'Iab'is•not desired, we: 4; s
s r
,
recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier. 'Vapor barriers should be protected by sand
in order'to reduce the possibility'of puncture and to'aid in obtaining uniform concrete'curin_ g.
- Reinforcement of slabs-on-grade'in order to resist expansive soil pressures may not be•required.
. •_> '�
However,. reinforcement, will have•a beneficial effect in containing. cracking due to concrete
"i
'shrinkage. 'Temperature and shrinkage related cracking -should be anticipated in all concrete '
A
slabs -on -grade.• Slab'reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined-by,the
".. ~• �.'
Structural Engineer.
♦"
Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate'concenfrations of the surface soils were determined to be
.wary 'from. less than'IO'to 66 parts per million (p"pm)., The test results., indicate that the surface
soils are' generally considered non -corrosive with respect .to concrete' and the use of Type' V.
'� ' b
' : cement or special sulfate resistant concrete mixes should not'be necessary: Appropriate concrete• ,
y :
mix designs should'be established based upon post grading test,results. - • '' s'
tea. .. � r
• ' i • • } 1 4
� ' • '
;.i, � �ti ;,;•' , ti ' ' ., + , '/ to � •K -
± • w •. .. •
R . - x • .. . ,t • • �I/I/J/J/J`N FNAINOO r/Nn '
, 4 � :' (r�., � ' - 'i f j ` •1 r 1 • - '. ' +,,,;�. y' ir ' ^ki.' ,+ T��k.., X 4rv.
y •, r• .. ; iA'pril 12,•2001 ` . - � ..• •'
-5- Project No. 544` 1076
t r , . ;M. �Ol 04=176
" ... • Tentative Pavement Design: All paving,should.be underlain by a,minimum compacted ill,,
.:. L thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base): This may be performed is described in the ,.Fv m' ;
' . 'Site Grading Section of,this report Tlie following preliminary pavement sections are based upon `
a design `R-Value_ of. 50 'and the recommended pavement design section corresponds with the
typical'rniniminn pavement section as determined by the,City of La Quinta.
�• f. Onsite Driveways and Parking Areas (Traffic Index = 6.0) ` ' 41.1
�`• Use 30 inches of asphalt on 4.5 inches of Class 2 base material
Aggregate base 'should conform to' requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of
_
• '� CalTrans`Standaid Specificatiors, January 1992. Asphaltic,concrete should conform to Section
;N J - 39 of the CalTrans Standaid Specations. The recommended sections should be provided with
` a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control 'of 'thickness' and elevations during
placement. • ` ';� `Yi '... •r :.• - ,,.�,4 �.' ,• ,
• Shrinkage ,and Subsidence: Volumetric: shrinkage of the material; which is excavated and • -
=°replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate thafthis shrinkage...
should vary from 20 to 25•percent. Subsidence of the surfaces which are`scarifiedand compacted
'should be between 0.2 and 0.3 tenth's of 'a- foot. This will vary depending,upon the*typeof
equipment used, the moisture content of .the soil'at the time of grading and the actual degree of
�t compaction attained.
t. These values for shrinkage and subsidence. are exclusive' of losses, •whicli' will occur due to the'
k stripping of the organic 'material 'from,the site,;the removal of deleterious materials, and the '
' removal of debris, trees and other subsurface obstructions.
General Site -Grading: ',All grading should be performed; ii1 accordance with the -grading
•;i}, Y'ordinance, of the City oft La Quinta, California. The following recommendations have been "t
Y testing. l l fi i " developed on th bass of our field and aborator
� �r • • •mot. p ..�# � • ..
L, .Clearing,'and ` Grubbii Proper clearing'of ;in existing ve etation "'debris
foundations, slabs, pavements and "underground utilities will be very important: `All"
surfaces to receive compacted fill should,be cleared of roots, vegetation, debris, and other `s
unsuitable materials that should be removed from the site. Soils that are disturbed due to
site clearing should be replaced as.coritrolled compacted fill under the direction•of the . a
Soils Engineer. P' •a'
' 2. ; Preparation 'of Building and' Foundation Areas: Building, areas', -should ' be
'overexcavated,to a•depth of -at least 3, feet below, existing grad' r. 3 feet below the
w
bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. ,The exposed surface'should.be scarified, x. ,
moisture` conditioned and 'compacted so that. a minimum of 90 percent -relative'
compaction is attained.. Oncedeleterious materials are removed, the native material may
placed 'as ,controlled compacted fill. - Overexcavation. should-- be observed by a ". f
representative'of SladdenrEngineering and compaction should be verified by testing.'
- 3. 'Preparation of Surfaces to Receive Compacted Fill: Other areas to receive' compacted "
fill should be brought to near optimum.moisture content and compacted to a minimum of .
90.percent relative compaction.
's ,� .. r +'/ .,#, r F ,rf r ' .. t - .a. . "r ' `, ,4 �fiF K •4t x ♦ 3.'7«� Y f_ `'' ':
. e z' k -' � f - ,� , .. +. ' f .. -•- ,. ry ('I-.-1.1-..�• C..� ....:.. «...... .. . e,..
April,12, 2001' ' 7.6- °Project No0 544-1676
01704-1.76
4. Placetnent'of Compacted Fill: Fill materials consisting of^on-site.soils. or approved
'imported granular soils, should be spread, in,thin lifts, -and compacted at near optimum
moisture content to a' minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. .,Imported material
x F' shall have •anFExpansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor•shalI notify the Soils,
:* Engineer at'least 48 hours in advance of importing soils in order to provide sufficient
i - time for the proper'evaluation of proposed import materials. '
71
The contractor shall be responsible for delivering in e�ial to the site,-,which.comply with,.. '
the project specifications. Approval by the Soils. Engineer will.be'based upon material '• • '
delivered to the site and not the preliminary.evaluation of import sources: `
_ •,'Our � observation's of the material encountered during our investigation indicate that
;- compaction,will be most readily obtained by me'ans;of heavy rubber -wheeled equipment
and/or vibratory compactors.
y 1 5. Preparation of Slab and Paving'Areas: All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving: ;,r•.
or concrete slabs-ori-grade, should be -underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness
• of 12 inches. ,'This may be accomplished ;by a combination of,, scarification ands.'
recompaction' of the •surface soils' and placements of the fill < material as 'controlled
t compacted fill. Compaction of the slab -and pavement areas should be.to a minimum of ~'
90 percent relative compaction. �j '
6: `Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and'observations should -be performed by ; :" '• �'
the Soils-Engineer`or'his representative in order to verify that.the'grading is being
performed in accordance with,the'project specifications. •'Field .density testing shall'be
performed in accordance with acceptable ASTM test methods.�The minimum acceptable'
degree of compaction should be 90,percent:of.the, maxi mum, dry, density as,obtained by,
the ASTM D1557-91=•test method. -Where testing indicates insufficient' density, = ♦ u t
additional compactive Meffort"shall. be applied; until retesting,, indicates 'satisfactory
,., -
compaction.
~•
GENERAL � •<<,. ,� .• P-�. F .,+ _ .
' y The findings .arid recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil.{ �• `
M1 'conditions+between the exploratory boring, locations and extrapolation of these,conditions throughout the .
proposed building area . Should conditions, encountered: -during grading 4appear•differerit than those ' j'; 4.�
indicated in this report, this office,sho_ uld be' notified.
•• 1
This report is considered to be applicable for use by Tradition�Golf�Club; LLC for the specific -site and
project described herein. -The use'of this report.by other parties or for other projects .is not authorised.
• *'� The recommendations of this report are •contingent upon monitoring of the grading operation by a .
T representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations -are considered to be tentative pending our Ai', '• -
ir review 'of the grading operation and additional te'sting,,if indicated. _If others are employed to perform any
F„ ls6il,testing,:this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to'coordinate.a6y required site `'a'
• visits.by our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering.
We recommend that a pre job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The -
purpose of this meeting will be'to`assure a complete' understanding, of the recommendations presented in. . `!
this report as they apply.to the `actual.grading performed.
,Sladd It
' . . P + _ � t . • � - � e Engineering , . 4
li '„�° :p 4{ •�• . � {., w
^•'
•l• -
,fig• r
• .t - �•. ..
- x - :�r-
�' :a ;.pi•'.[,. i y
'�%'
'yf n•
P
.{ h [ Ay.
F;'
_
,r; ;yW
r1
♦� '/ >J
♦ ., ti- •
a � ter. i.
r 1'
r
Zrf " /
a 1v '
•
».
'�.a 4 �. 'f . -`*
r
-
,'Vkti
••
� •
� 1
t a
fi. }-.
•`x,T
� r�' r'_ n 5
-
.y ,
t
-
:T_
5 '±,
,�
2 tt,.• e . .`; a
r .•
, '�. YI �
°' .'��� �t
t«;
� a ,k .: .� 2C _
+,,,T-`��}
•:5 - •f�
1
• .
... .. ifµ
4. .�
APPENDIX A'
S f•. .i 1
, t '
•Sf r•
� .,R�1-
'4• mot.
t
Site Plan •y
~Boring
• ': w
♦'
` t
r'
,-
...
{'
Logs
# _L
- r • � 5 � . � t Y'r. � ..
� . (K ' f't,.
r ,. J � � X � a'i' .�
f1G, •t ; � '.� A a
. • _ •,
y v, ••
T �,
,
Ia •r
•
7
� • • • i Y � .a , f• `
t - 5
,.
rr � •
'
1, � y �.
�
J y
•,
C•-
+`• ..
` f r 1't
_ `I �;f a
� +
• ^�"
• -
•
! i. tt. _- {
.x at.,
\ •`}
r � 3 ,KS
'. i ,/. �
'a •" ?i .i w +i, J� ..
..a
tt.
,+• •/ • .{•
.tt t'4,^ r � ..�,,
`
+•'
�
I
• r Y .'V• r• �• rI. ` •' `
r *
n ft
• e ,
• !' yr
�,, t,ir
, ,!
;.
,�
�,: 'F, _ ,,
•
•fir. r -
'�
�
- ..F E: .+
,{
' +ti,.
!: 'fit ,t •,t - a
-
`
.'�� • •.
�
�'
t'
• �- �' ;» ` •
5 T• .. t
r. " Slddden EnQin-eerink ",
x
=
r
,
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION
For our field investigation, 6 exploratory borings were excavated on March 23, 2001,.using a truck `
mounted hollow stem auger rig (Mobile B61) in the approximate locations indicated on the, site plan
included in this appendix. Continuous.logs of the materials encountered were prepared on the site by a
.representative of Sladden Engineering. The boring logs are included in this appendix.
Representative undisturbed samples were, obtained within :our borings by driving a .thin -walled steel
penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) or a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler with a
140 pound hammer dropping approximately 30 inches (ASTM D1586). The number of blows required to
drive the samplers 18 inches was recorded in 6 inch increments, and blowcounts are indicated"on the
boring logs.'
The -California samplers are 3.0 inches in diameter, carrying brass sample _rings having inner diameters of
2.5 inches. , The, standard penetration samplers are 2.0 inches in diameter with an inner diameter. of 1.5
inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in
order to -preserve the natural soil moisture content. Bulk samples were obtained from the excavation
spoils and samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing:
1
s
r
e
.Gladden RnQineerine
0 welf
—J
—40—
'75"'
. . . ........ .
N3-3-40.
JIM
•
ra m-
r
>
■I WIE al Ll
9 Ot 'I a 3x:
sit u
C
Is w N
4) SITE
NZ s
0 los
F
Former Alignment of Avenue 52 -T
■Le
oil
IF
M M 4A M b r58
•O.
1P
10 a
PA 9 MW 0
0 44
-N33'4(
off
I : 7
1P a
La Quinta
. . . .......
or N
I N
Alk
MR
3-D'I'opoQuads Copyright C) 1999 DeLorme Yarninw... NIE 04096 Source Data: I:S(;S 34;0 1`1 Scale: I : 9.600 Detail: 14-4 Datum: \\'(;SH4
r I,
u
... —�1..
� I j r e_----•;14A; N � —
Ir .5
• I I41 / \per ,-1�� �� � • / / +
sk
Boring Location Map
lib Approximate Boring Locations,
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant
Z t Avenue 52 & Desert Club Drive
.• La Quints, California - n
Sladden Engineering
DATE: 4-18-01 JOB NO.: 544-1076
" Proposed Palmer's Restaurant t ,
Avenue 52 &Desert Club Drive / La Quinta, California
Date; 3-23-01
Borinar
No. l Job No.: 544-1076
o
�
DESCRIPTION
�
q
rn
REMARKS
ri
U
Pq
rn°
U
.
o
'
Silty Sand: Brown,
SM
_
4/8/10
very silty, fine grained
94
0.5,
85
5
7/13/14
Sandy Silt: Brown,
ML
100
1.0
_-_
-
very sandy
.
Silty Sand: Brown,
SM
94
1.0
85
to
4/7/12
- .
fine grained
15
6/12/18
Sand Silt: Brown clayey
Y �
ML
93
2.0
`
_
�
20
UM
10/20/22
Clayey Silt: Brown
ML
96
2.0
-
•
Total Depth = 21.5'
-
-Recovered Sample
No Bedrock .
-
No Groundwater
25
30
35
40
45
50
_
Note: The stratification lines
55
represent the approximate _.
'
boundaries between the soil types;
the transitions may be gradual.
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant
Avenue 52 & Desert Club Drive / La Quinta, California ,
Date: 3-23-01
orine No.
2 Job No.: 544-1076
o
a
' -
DESCRIPTION,
A
0
a>
�4-j
W Cd
REMARKS
H
t
O
'� a
v1
U
Pq
W
.°
U
0
Sandy Silt: Brown,
ML
very sandy
6/27/31
90
1.0
5
6/9/10
Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey
ML
95
3.1-
---
10
9/13/20
88
3.1
15
1�8/15/24
87
5.3
-•.
• T
d • � � '
.'� .
�� a
L
1
t
1
�.
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant t
t ' ' Avenue 52 & Desert Club Drive / La Quinta, California .' '
Date: 3-23-01
orinLr No. 6 Job No.: 544-1076
43
:,,DESCRIPTION
'
a'
REMARKS
- ., .
A
U
• PA
r
o
a U
'
-
4/11114 +,
91
Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey
ML
r, 94
l y
2.0
--
• •Cry
.+
y •'y
L 6
y
7/10/10
,t
92 X
2.6
10
7/8/12.
Silty,,Sand: Brown,
S1VI
`, .94
1.5
85
fine grained ,
15
7112/15
Sandy:Silt: Brown '£ «. , t
` ML
3.1
---
r
' 4,
very sandy ..
496
:
20
8/13/18 -
Silty Clay: Brown,
CL +
-90.
4.2
- ,
Total Depth = 21.5'
- Recovered Sample
No Bedrock
No Groundwater
25
•;,
30
35
+A
+
Y
t
40'
,.
45
{
'
yr
,
•F
50
4
1 y
•
t4
f. `.
;
'Note: The "stratification lines
55 representtheapproximate
+ ; boundaries between the, soil types;
1 / , , " • the transitions maybe gradual.
t ` " '�� -�A ♦4. fir• .•y A' � 1' • !'+. � +. r ' ..- . -' ' '=' .
el
``�
,t 4•
A i,. �
•+
r R
'
--. '!-
+
`
i � TA4.+{ if
� {, t•.rg4 k1,:i ./.
` i•-+.tA
".R
�
'
Vr
: . • . .` � t,
• (
1. a,
•-31 / f i. (f. T ' a .c � A " ,�
`
wr•
`is
•.
APPENDIX B
-_
-;
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory Test Results
'S
-�
" ••
�-w
♦ '.3 ._ _ +
.. ..•
•�i-' �' + �':.,f.-
..y ..s
. R,f,'
♦'' • 7 F`'it �• 9 •
it 17
.-'
. 1 •/ :
a T �`
•' f� rl(„ � V �
- .f
f. _
.,
'_ `
� J.
3.�.
.-4
.+#.ri
. e`3t Y J
,3
e -
r
"4
Y
, r - {, '•
.•
. +p
.r' ,R .f f s. ti ; '��i
r,,
-
,.i
•:a: n.
i
{ •f r
+ " " t' .4'3=�•,
' ..♦f . _.
as
♦ {
r
;
i
(
} � l: 4r ay +..
'.
nVt I y A ... i � •- 7+
.. -
,.'+ _ 3_
"i j
(T
- `,'.V..
� }
-
T
rr,
t (
� t k� �•y t ', 1
"~ •A `��'
.f
�
�r."
-4
..
,� ,
.- �.
i'
" t y
41
Sladden Eng'hkerinn t ..
- A
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TESTING
Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained'in the field and returned to our
laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing was generally performed in two
phases. The first phase consisted of testing in order to determine the compaction of the existing natural
soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was
performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics of the soil and to serve as a basis for
selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing.
This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order to
provide a means of developing specific design recommendations based on the mechanical properties of
the soil.
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING
Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and
measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to
testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of
the soil in its natural condition. The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Logs. r
Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for
maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard
D1557-91, Test Method A. The results of this testing are presented graphically in this appendix. The
maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing
relative compaction to the soil. This is shown on the Boring Logs, and is useful in estimating the strength
and compressibility of the soil. `
Classification Testing: Soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of
mechanical grain size analyses, and Atterberg Limits determinations. These provide information for
developing classifications for the soil in accordance with the Unified Classification System. This
classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The
results of this testing are very useful in detecting variations in the soils and in selecting samples for .
further testing.
SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING `
Direct Shear Testing: Two bulk samples were selected for Direct Shear Testing. This testing measures
the shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used in developing parameters for
foundation design and lateral design. Testing was performed using recompacted test specimens, which
were saturated prior to testing. Testing -was performed using a strain controlled test apparatus with
normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot.
Expansion Testing: Two bulk samples were selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was
performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. This testing consists of remolding 4-inch diameter
by 1-inch thick test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50
,percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed
to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear
expansion is then measured until complete.
Consolidation Testing: Six relatively undisturbed samples were selected for consolidation testing.- For
this.testing one -inch thick test specimens are subjected to vertical loads varying from 575 psf to.] 1520 psf
applied progressively. The consolidation at each load increment was recorded prior to placement of each
subsequent load. The specimens were saturated at the 575 psf or 720 psf load increment.
Gladden F.nnineerinQ
. ? �t .w � ro - ,pit
yr � .,ry0. r� e�•
r l . ,, r o
•�` �
F t�T� �
'�l • Y 'Vj �}i�
y'1
�~
. • !, _
t
� �' F
, s � i
.��-1) �
t
,'L. w �
..f
� a � �r"
� I
�1�.ib t�
� l .1�� f. j
�,
..- <
i.,
. -.4` t >r - ,fie
.. i �=
f � d .• .
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
I
1
1
1
1
,
1
I
I
1
•
1.6
1
1
1
1.4
•
1
1
1
1.2
1
1
i
I
1
1.0
1
1
I
1
„
•_-
1
I
i
1
I
1
1
6
1
1
L
1.
1
1
.4
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
.
2
1
,
I
1
I
1
1
'
0
0 .2
.4
.6 8 1.0 1.2
1.4 1.6.1 1.8' .
=320
r
c = 120 psf
where 0 =
Shear Angle
4
c =
Cohesion
Boring 1 @ 0 - 5'
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant
Avenue 52 & Desert Club Drive
Lai Quinta, California
Sladden Engineering
DATE. 4-18=01 JOB NO.: 544-1076
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
.8
.6
4.
.2
0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
0=26 -
c=380psf
where 0 = Shear Angle -
Boring 2 @ 0 - 5'
c =Cohesion
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant
Avenue 52 & Desert Club Drive
La Quinta, California
Sladden Engineering
DATE: 4-18-01 JOB NO.: 544-1076
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot
0.000
0.720 2.880
5.760
0.0
.01
.02
.03
.04
H
N
a
.05
V
L'.
F-1
ii
.06
0
03
b
o
CO
a
0
.07
U
.08
.09
0.1
11
.12
13
Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 1 @ 15'
EDate:4/18/01
EN ENGINEERING
Job No.: 544-1076
ffect�e—?adding =
Pressure in HIPS per Square Foot
0.000 0.720
2.880
5.760
WatUT
0.0
.01
.02
.03
.04
a�
a
�
.05
V
H
�i
.06
O
N
o
.07
m
0
U
.08
.09
0.1
11
z
71
.12
18
Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 1 @ 20'
EDate:4/18/01
EN ENGINEERING
Job No.: 544-1076
�di_ng�
0.0
0.000
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot
0.720 2.880
5.760
.01
.02
.03
x
q
.04
z z
z I z z
z z
d
a
a
.05
v
.06
0
o
.07
0
V
.08
VE:
.09
0.1
.11
.12
.13
bi
Proposed Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
Boring 2 @ 5'
SLADDEN ENGINEERING
Date: 4/18/01 Job No.: 544-1076
Pressure in HIPS per Square Foot
0.000
0.720
2.880
5.760
0.0
.O1
.02
.03
U
o
.04
N
a
CO
.05
x
C.
1--1
J.-7
.06
O
cz
o
.07
L'.
U
.08
.09
0.1
11
.12
.13
Palmer's.Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 2 @ 10'
EDate:4/18/01
EN ENGINEERING
Job No.: 544-1076
=Eon'
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot•
0.000
.575
2.300
4.600
0.0
.01
.02
.03
a
.04
N
a�
a,
a
.05
a
a
.06
0
o
.07
U
.08
.09
0.1
.11
.12
.13
71
Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 2 @ 15'
EDate:4/18/01
EN ENGINEERING
Job=No.:544-1076
=E1'#'ec�=e�A�di
bier-
_ �i,eboa� _
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot
0.000
.575 2.300
4.600
0.0
EF
.0,
.02
.03
.04
Ftdbomn
04
a
.05
U
1--1
G.'
.06
O
co
o
.07
m
Ci
O
.08
.09
0.1
.11
.12
Z
z
.13
Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 2 @ 20'
r
EN ENGINEERING
Job No.: 544-1076
E�'ec� €e Aid
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot
0.000
.575
2.300
4.600
0.0
.01
.02
.03
U
q
.04 EEE
a
a
.05
a
.06
0
.1
o
.07
U
.08
.09
0.1
11
.12
13
Palmer's Restaurant
Consolidation Diagram
oring 4 @ 2'
EDate:4/18/017ob
EN ENGINEERING
No.: 544-1076
—E�fecA�di
&ebnnnd
Pressure in KIPS per Square Foot
0.000
.575
2.300
4.600
0.0
.01
.02
.03
x
q
.04
a
a
.05
.06
0
-is
o
'.07
0
U
.08
.09
0.1
11
.12
.13
er's Restaurant
Pr:SLADDEN
Consolidation Diaeram
6 @ 2'
GINEERING
Date:b No.: 544-1076
=E�feA�di
C
1997.UNIFORM BUILDING CODE INFORMATION
The •International Conference of Building Officials 1997 Uniform Building Code contains substantial t' `
revisions and additions to the earthquake engineering section summarized in Chapter 16. Concepts
contained in the 1997 code that -will likely be relevant to construction of the proposed residential
structures are summarized below: ;
Ground shaking.is expected to be the primary hazard most likely to.affect'the site, based upon proximity
to significant faults capable of generati,ng large earthquakes. Major fault zones considered to be most
likely to create strong ground shaking at the site are listed below.
Fault Zone
Approximate Distance
From Site
Fault Type
1997 UBC
San Andreas
12.5 km
A
San Jacinto
30 km
A =
Based on .our field observations and understanding of local geologic conditions, the soil profile.type '
judged applicable to this site is Sp, generally described as'stiff or dense soil. The site is located within
UBC Seismic Zone 4. The following table presents additional coefficients and factors relevant to seismic
mitigation for new construction upon adoption of the 1997 code.
Near -Source
Near -Source
Seismic
Seismic
Seismic
Acceleration
Velocity
Coefficient
Coefficient
Source
Factor, Na
Factor, N;,
Ca "
C„
San Andreas
1.0
1.15
0.44 Na
0.64 N,,'
`San Jacinto
1.0
1.0
0.44 Na _
0.64 N„
r
,1
�, tr yin ;� .>
aK,
. ' .tip s,
� Y r, :,,� � •.
r 4r -_ ]. _ _
') 1µ ., ., .
._ • e r, i
', a " 'i 1 � ±"
(r•
, * ,
�� , i m
"A
,*
I
*:'
�,' j
,� U L°R E Q T
' F
.
'' '� s.' y,r•
,•is ., ,: .
,i i
e• �,
All
Version •3. 00 •
* `a'
+
Y.
x v
.. DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF, ,
«
,'
PEAK',ACCELERATION'FROM':DIGITIZED FAULTS '�a'.=►.:.
�•
r.
,s,.
JOB -NUMBER.' S49-1076
r ' . 4
'• 'r"r ` , - - ",.
' DATE: 09 419-2001
Y r _
- 4' w Y, _, '�" , ,.4� .. , x, •. Y +Y r w i
; ' +i '} i• ,
1. + , � 1 }rA `
y.. JOB :NAME: Palmer'•sRestaurant- / 'Ave-nueR«52 & Desert
Club
CALCULATION'NAME: Test Run Analysis, `
FAULT=DATA-FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT
`SITE
COORDINATES:
SITE,'LATITUDE: 33. 6736
• SITE LONGITUDE: 116.2497
.miA'
' SEARCHN RADIUS:, lob
ATTENUATION RELATION: 5`) Boore et al. :'(1997)• HoAz. - SOIL. (310)
'
UNCERTAINTY,-.(M=Median, S=Sigma),: M _ ,Number
of,Sigmas: 0.0N
+._ .
;DISTANCE, MEASURE: cd 2drp
SCOND: - 0
'Basement Depth:' .5.00 .km' ,•' CampbeiL,SSR:•
Campbell'; SHR:
,,COMPUTE PEAK•HORIZONTAL,ACCELERATION,'
' FAULT -DATA FILE
USED:; CDMGFLTE.. DATL4
4 , MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km) . 0. 0
' f't i]t'. �+ .�, '•' , .yl. w
0
:i .•�" rl
n 'r r' , '
EQFAULT
SUMMARY
-----------------------------
DETERMINISTIC,SITE
-------------------------------
PARAMETERS
Page. 1
I
77
JESTIMATE,D MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT
APPROXIMATE I ----------------------------
ABBREVIATED I
DISTANCE I.
MAXIMUM I
PEAK
JEST. SITE
FAULT NAME I
mi
(km) JEARTHQUAKEI
SITE
JINTENSITY
- I
I
MAG.(Mw) I
ACCEL. g.JMOD.MERC.
_______________________1=====__,__=====1==========1==========I===.______
SAN ANDREAS - Coachella 1
7.8(
12.5)1
7.1 1
0.298
1 IX
SAN ANDREAS - Southern 1
7.8(
12''5)1
7.4 1
0,349
1 IX
SAN JACINTO-ANZA 1
18.8'(
30:2)1
7.2, 1
0.168.
I VIII
SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK 1
19.1(
30.8)1
6.8 1
0.134
1. VIII
BURNT MTN: 1
19..3(
31.0)1
6.4 1
0.108
1 VII
SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino 1
20.1(
32.3)1
7.3 1
0.168
1 VIII
EUREKA PEAK 1
20.4(
32.8)1`
6.4 1
0.103
1 VII
PINTO MOUNTAIN 1
31.8(
.51.1)1
7.0 1
0.101
1' VII
SAN JACINTO - BORREGO 1
33.3+
53.6)1
6.6 1
0.079
1 VII
EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. 1
34.1(
54..9),1
6.9 1.
0.091
1 VII
LANDERS 1
34.5(
55.5)1
7.3 1
0.111
'1 VII
SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY 1
35.8(
57.6)1
6.9 1
.0.087
1 VII
PISGAH-BULLION MTN.-MESQUITE LK 1
36.'2(
58.3)J
7'.1 1
0:096
1 VII
EARTHQUAKE VALLEY I
37.7(
60.6)1
6.5 1
0.068
1 VI
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) 1
39.1(
62.9)1
6.7 1
0.089
1 VII
BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE 1
40.,9(
65.8)J
6.4 1
0.061
1 VI
ELS-INORE-JULIAN 1
41.1(.
66.2)1
7.1 1
0.087
1 VII
JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) 1
45.3(
72.9)1.
6.7. 1
0.066
1 VI
ELSINORE-TEMECULA 1
45.9(
73.8)1
6.8 1
0.068
1 VI'
CALICO - HIDALGO 1
47.3(
76.2)1
7.1 1
0.078
1 VII
ELMORE RANCH 1
48.0(
77.3)1
6.6 1
0.059
1 VI
ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN 1
49.1(
79.0)1
6.8 1
0.065
1 VI
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) 1
50.6(
81.4)1
7.0 1
0.086
1• VII
LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGSJ
50.8(
81.7)1
7.3 1
0.082
1 VII
SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) 1
51.8(
83.4)1
6.6 1
0.056
1 VI
SUPERSTITION HILLS (;San Jacinto)1
52.8(
'85.0)1
6.6 1
0.,055
1 VI
HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT 1
58.3(
93.8)1.
7.1 11
0.067
1 VI
SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO 1,
58.9(
94.8)1
6.7' 1
_ 0.053
1 VI
ELSINORE-GLEN.IVY 1
60•.3(
97.1)1
6.8 1
•0.055
1 VI
CLEGHORN 1.
66..9(
107.7)1
6.5 1
0.044
1 VI
IMPERIAL 1
67.3(
108.3)1
7.0 1.
0.056
1. VI
LAGUNA SALADA 1
- 69.8(,
112.3) 1
'7.0 1
0.055
1 VI
CHINO -CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) 1
73.7(
118.6)1
6.7 1
0.055
1 VI
ROSE CANYON 1
74.1(
119.2)1
.6.9 1
0.050
1 VI
NEWPORT.-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) 1
74.1(
119.3)1
6.9 1
0.050
1 VI
CUCAMONGA 1.
74.2(
119.4)1
7.0 1
0.064
'1 VI
WHITTIER 1
77.9(
125.4)1,
6.8 1
0.045
1 VI
SAN ANDREAS.- Mojave 1
83.3(
134.1)1
7.1 1
0.050
1 VI
SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture 1
83.3(.134.1)1
7.8 1
0.073
1, VII
SAN JOSE 1
85.6(
137.7)1
6.5 1
0.044
1 VI
--- -------,—---_._— ___ r •t .j _r' ;�,
F'�' +t`
---------
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS'-1
- '---- ----- cr;�•
' •Page
.4�2
r` Y
.f
' --, ----, - ----- -------------------
-. — — — — -
'__ _ _ �
— — —
,
'
_ _
T • ':
� I ESTIMATED MAX 'EARTHQUAKE EVENT "•
APPROXIMATE I ---------- ----------------------
r r - ABBREVIATED
"SIT�
I DISTANCE I' MAXIMUM • °.,I PEAKx- x :,I EST. E_.r``'
FAULT ,NAME ,.
I m (kin) ^ I EARTHQUAKE I , '- SITE ,' '1 INTENSITY- ' . y c �--
I =MAG• (Mw) I ACCEL: g:.IMOD`:MERCr` ,
SIERRA MADRE,i.88.4
(r•142.3) 1 ''7.0 I� a`. I VI • - �� `,�`:
CORONADO BANK r '
,0.056
I 89.2( 143..5) 1 7.9 I;'' 0..056- I- VI- ".
GRAVEL°HILLS - HARPER -LAKE
I `90.2(,145:1) 1 6.9 /y•,1 0.•093
' + ELYSIAN• PARK THRUST '
I •� 90. 3 ( 1-145. 3,) 1 - 6.7• 1. x 0. 047 ,' 1 , r VI•
k'S'
` NEWPORTFINGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin)i 1 .93.'6(f150:6) 1 6.9 1 0.,.041, 1 V
COMPTON' THRUST `
I 96. 6 (. 155.5) I 6.8; I 0.10.4.7.
CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT f r
I 97.1'( 156:3) I. 6.5 1�: 0.040• "'I ," ?
f' r PALOS VERDES r
1 98. 1'( 157':8)`:I'. .' 7:1 1 ,' 0.044' .1VI
' =END OF SEARCH- '. 48. FAULTS
FOUND WITHIN. THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS:{•
'x THE,SAN ANDREAS,- Coachella
'FAULT• ISCLOSEST'TO •THE SITE: , . 2
•
`IT IS ABOUT 7.8 MILES (12.5
km)T AWAY. w �. n .. '¢: • {
'LARGEST MAXIMUM -EARTHQUAKE
SITE ACCELERATION: 0.3491 g
,M "- ,�
i - - � r h1 '
•
1 l
Y .fir ,� ' y_ _ r' 4r
t,
, t ,s 4�p� `• fay,• • '�
•�.,
y a
r r, ,: !
•.
�� � •M,
. t. .�
x... -t sA � '+r' "t•. , ' e`
•
• ` - + �
...�r .. e F. •
• t^
` .. .. �-,
�' . •+`
' � " Vie`
.• 1. -
a .j+, i'. +5, 1. �' 'fir
'
• .. 1.
.
i,r`''f •'�r�
' ..
+ Y�
1
•' A`
rfY
' � r.t + i n
.wy`
*' •• " � �
`,� •l. .
'
`
! r
- •� G
,.�
•� f •
,fi'
- , ,d _• a Y,.
r -
� r ,. ,' r >•
y a
., y
'`.
a • .,'.
• F ,f ..; r<.
- - 'yv•
�ryJ,.^•'y
♦ ,
ri y v a ,,�_1..
' CALIF�ORNIA FAULT MAP
�' �y ;. ,
�� C ��r Y..i
f
�� 1}
"Palme'r's Restaurant /Avenue 52' &Desert Club .
-
+ 14
, .� :
1100
F
t `
' 1000
7800
r .. 600
500
300
200
100
ITE
1
j O
•; . �, ";,' 7-400
. • . -300 -200 -100
0 100 " 200 'r 300
400 500; ' .600 ;.' E, , `•
AA
a
C
' STRIKESLAPTAULTS.
}
• . 5)^Booze.
et al. (1997) Horiz. '-
SOIL (310) ;
M . & M=6 ♦
; M=7 ." M=8a ' ,
1
y
.01
b, y
.001
1 ' . 10
t Too, , ... .
.
Distancejadistj°
(km)
T
.•
r E.. - ' � ., .
r x l a
'� �
�
- � '+
srff { .
,frs.
y '. t� r }.'! f' •. t;
�
Ji
y,
I � JNJ .l i
«Z '� ,
! t.r JSi �L.. .. _
ti �,'
,. •• _ - f
ry + ' t ,...
�,n �f ^
. . , M h
A
DIP ',SLIP TAULTSi.,4 r
}
Je
5) Boore: et al. (19. 97) Horiz - .SOIL ..(31,0) i - '! 4
t{- J
,
•.s r .t
t 'fib 1y
p i i- r. �:�+ �P
..
r J•• ' �_ .71•+5
i a sa' �
t f 1r�
,
._ .4s .us �
_ ..1
a +•
,mot
x�LL
R •i
'•' �'
i s M -
•, •••.}
� *
, f 4 "' .
• '
�
� , + }
•'<t..
-
;
. ; �. ..
- + i
5 ... a • � . .1. .r. . I i t � 7 . v .y
ijj•.
I -
-- r
,+
a
�
.01
•. ;1
A
- •
{. ,. a ..+:.
n h •
a•. , t �{ y ♦ni «
It
1 4
mf
.. ! .tom " tr y; -
. .5 .. , � - f f -
6• y, :{;
. .001�_
00
Distance ��st�
adi
r(kr l)�
147
j BLINDTHRUc"W.,�T FAULTS
,
Boore-et
al'. ('1997).;Horiz.-•SOIL`(310)
.5)
M-5 M=6 .M, _ 7 '' ,M-8
' •"+' - ti `
t .. y ate, y .. 't, .. f . .cu%. +�'. +
i
� +
CU
Y.01
n • l
f.
r
l
Distance:radistl+ (km)
Y
.. � ,� r .ti. \+. ,_ y.., „ • a '}• \ ._i�( yt � w• .• '+ }ark,'
74Y:_!
. �^"-' yl - Jy L ,4•• - a'f r � �• ,f '1i �•r• • _ 4 tIr �M1 •
\ " Y MAXIMUM-YEART,H
wQUAKE.S,.
Palmer s Restaurant A Avenue t52' & Desert Club
40
x. 1
f' 4 I•t . i ' r. ... �. ", u - Y ., _ .yf,+z' - . , * rt'. � ., a s!. ", '
� t 1, T. � ., � ,} i \ f+ + r`,.th "-r� � • fit, '''� "y,� � . c
' � \ '_• - • i � , „ Y j': ^a.. � - "• � t.' r F F , r • �.-.+ ; � . \`ir�r ' SK.
••t r, s t o Y iW/ \ r 4 tT r t
Cc
., .01
At
1 � � T ' .,� ti •Try.
{` f+ ft" ';' ,.t +1 n 1 a •r^1 .. • 1♦ ... 1'0 1t0 OY�y •.� .'' , 1 . r, t
,;: �;. �•.� �• :\ . << • 1_ , . • • �. �Distance'rmi1
I
r
EAGLE CREST CAPITAL BANK ^.
5201 EDEN AVENUE, SUITE 170 `
EDINA, MN 55436 `
REPORT OF PHASE I
t
ENVIRONMENTAL' SITE ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER RESTAURANT
+ 78-164 AVENUE 52.
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS
770-190-001, 770-181-002,:-003, AND -004
'
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA
5
'
December 10, 2002
-2002 Earth Systems Southwest
` Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited
without the express written consent of Earth Systems Southwest. y
File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
Earth Systems
' e Southwest 79-811B Country Club Drive
Bermuda Dunes, CA 9220.1
(760)345-1588
(800)924-7015
FAX.(760) 345-7315
December'10, 2002 File No.: 08957-01
' 02-12-726
Eagle Crest Capital Bank
' 5201 Eden Avenue, Suite 170
Edina, MN 55436
Attention: Mr. Jim Natysin
Subject: Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
' Project: 78-164 Avenue 52
Proposed Arnold Palmer Restaurant
' Assessors Parcel Numbers 770-790-001, 770 ' 181-002, .-003, and -.004
La Quinta,.California
' Dear Mr. Natysin:
' As. you requested, Earth Systems Southwest has completed ,this Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) of the site referenced above. Note that this report was prepared for your
exclusive use. It was prepared to stand as a whole and no part should be excerpted or used in
exclusion of any other part. This project was conducted in accordance with our proposal dated
October 28, 2002. This report completes the scope of services outlined in our proposal.
' Thank you for this opportunity'to be of service. If you have any questions regarding this report,
or the information contained herein, please contact this office at your convenience.
' Sincerely,
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST=�
l
' SCOT
STORf,IO
Scot A. Stormo RG 4826 CERTIFIED
, HYDROGEOLOGIST
' Vice President N RG 4825
HG 204
ESE Report/sas/dac
Distribution: 6/Mr. ,Jim Natysin
1 /SAS
2/BD File
1/RC File
REPORT OF PHASE I
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
78-164 AVENUE 52
PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER RESTAURANT
}
ASSESSORS PARCEL; NUMBERS
770-790-001, 770-181-002, -003, AND -004
-
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA
December 10, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1
1.1 Projectlnformation.....................:............................................................................I
1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work........................................................................I.............I.
1.3 Limitations.........................................................................:.....................................2
2.0
SITE INFORMATION....................................................................::...........:................:..2
2.1 Site Development and Location ....................................... ..........................................
2' .
2.2 Current Site Condition ................... .................................. .........................................
3
2.3 Site Vicinity....................................................................................:...................:..:.3
2.4 Geology and Hydrogeology.....................................................................................3
3.0
HISTORICAL INFORMATION.....................................................................................4
3.1 Aenal Photographs.......................................................... :.........................................
4
3.2 Topographic Maps...................................................................................................5
3.3 Munger Oil Maps ...... .................... :..:.........................................................................
4.0
AGENCY INFORMATION.........................................................................................:....5
4.1 Agency Database Search Report ...............................................................................5'
4.2 Agency Interviews................
'
4.3 Other Sources of Information.............................:...........................................I.........6
5.0
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
...................................7
'APPENDIX A Figures
APPENDIX B Photographs
APPENDIX C Agency Database Search Report
-APPENDIX D Qualifications Statement
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
r
December 10, 2002 - 1 - File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Information
This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted
by Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) for the proposed Arnold Palmer's Restaurant site, 78-164
Avenue 52, La Quinta, Riverside County, California. The site consists of four parcels that were
merged into one for a total of 4.98 acres. The four Assessors Parcel Numbers (APNs) are 770-
190-001, 770-181-002, -003, & -004. Figures depicting the site location and layout are presented
in Appendix A. This project was conducted for Eagle Crest Capital Bank in accordance with our
,proposal dated October 28, 2002.
1.2 Puruose and Scone of Work
The .purpose of an ESA is to evaluate the potential for the presence of soil or groundwater
contamination that may be present because of the past use, handling, storage, or disposal of
hazardous materials or petroleum products on or near the property. The scope of work for this
' evaluation is based on ASTM Standard E-1527-00, Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments, and consisted of the tasks listed below.
' Site Reconnaissance: This involved: (A) a' visual reconnaissance of the site, noting
physical evidence, of potential contamination or possible sources of contamination;
(B) interviews with persons familiar with the site (if possible) regarding present and past
' site usage; and (C) observation of adjacent properties to identify visual evidence of
possible impacts to the subject site. Significant on -site conditions were photographed to
' document current conditions. Selected site photographs are presented in Appendix B.
Site History Investigation: The history of the site was investigated regarding past land
use at and near the site,' specifically as it relates to the storage; production, use, or
' disposal of hazardous materials. The sources of information for this evaluation are listed
in the references section of this report, and included the following categories of
information:
' Aerial hoto a hs
p �' p
■ Topographic maps
Munger Oil maps
' Regulatory Agency Record Review: Many, regulatory agencies compile information
concerning sites that generate, store, use, and/or release hazardous materials. This
information can be accessed by reviewing lists published by the regulatory agencies. A
' report listing known sites that generate, store, use, and/or have released hazardous
materials was obtained from Track Info Services LLC, a firm that specializes in
maintaining a database of this type. of information. A copy of the Track Info Services
t LLC Environmental FirstSearch report is presented in Appendix C, and is discussed in
Section 4. The search radius for this review was in accordance with ASTM standard E-
1527-00. In addition, selected government agencies were contacted for information they
' may have regarding environmental conditions at or near the site.
' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
IDecember 10, 2002 .
1
1
LI
1
- 2 - File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
Report Preparation: This report was prepared to present our findings, conclusions, and,
recommendations. A qualifications statement regarding the personnel who performed
this evaluation is presented in Appendix D.
Exclusions: Testing the air, groundwater, soil, 'or building materials for the presence of
hazardous constituents was beyond the scope of this evaluation. As stated in the proposal, land
title information would only be reviewed if furnished by the Client. Land title information was
not provided to ESSW, and therefore was not reviewed.
1.3 Limitations
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Eagle Crest Capital Bank. The
conclusions and recommendations rendered in this report are. opinions based on readily available
information obtained to date within the scope of the work authorized by the client. The scope of
work for this project was developed to address the needs of the client as part of a property
transaction (buy, sell, refinance, etc.) and may not meet the needs of other users. Other parties
participating in the transaction for which this project was conducted may also use the information
presented in this report, provided said parties agree that ESSW shall have no additional liability
arising from such use than described in the contract under which this project was conducted (a
copy of that contract will be provided upon request). Any other use of ,or reliance on the
information and opinions contained in this report without the written authorization of ESSW is at
the sole risk of the user.
'It,should be noted that any level of assessment cannot ascertain that a property is completely free
of chemical or toxic substances. We believe the scope of work has been appropriate to allow the
client to make an informed business decision.
The results contained in this report are based upon the information acquired during the
assessment, including information obtained from third parties. ESSW makes no claim as to the
accuracy of the information obtained from others. In addition, it is possible that variations exist
beyond or between points explored during the course of the investigation, and that changes in
conditions can occur in the future due to the works of man, contaminant migration, variations in
rainfall, temperature, and/or other factors not apparent at'the time of the field investigation. It
should also be 'noted that in active blow -sand areas, sand can accumulate quickly behind
windbreaks. Consequently, materials can be. buried out of view by natural wind-blown sand in a
`relatively short period under favorable conditions.
The services performed by ESSW have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing .under
similar conditions in the site vicinity. No warranty is expressed or implied.
2.0 SITE INFORMATION
2.1 Site Development and Location
The site consists of approximately 4.98 acres of formerly agricultural land that is currently
vacant. The site is located in the southwest quarter of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7
' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
December 10, 2002 - 3 - File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
East, San Bernardino baseline and meridian (see Figure 1 in Appendix A) known as 78-164
Avenue 52, La Quinta, California.
The site -is roughly triangular and is bound to the north and part of the west by a 6-foot high block
wall, by Desert Club Drive along the south end of the west boundary, and by Avenue 52 to the
south and east: The elevation of the site is approximately 40 feet above mean sea level. The site
surface is hummocky, with small dunes less than 3 feet high. The elevation near.the wall at the
north of the site is approximately 4 or 5 feet lower. Surface water in.the area generally drains to
the east-southeast.
2.2 Current Site Condition
ESSW personnel visited the site on December 6, 2002, to observe current site conditions and
adjacent land use. A summary of our findings is presented below. .
The site generally consisted of vacant land with an approximately 6-foot high wall along the
north boundary and part of the western boundary of the site (Photo 1). Small dunes and
sagebrush were present throughout the large eastern portion of the site. .
■ Several large palm trees were the only vegetation in the western -most portion of the site,
along Desert Club Drive (Photo 2). Remnants of a concrete driveway and concrete rubble
were observed near the west boundary in the location of the former residence (noted in
historical aerial photos — see Section 3.1). Uprooted trees and yard waste were deposited in
a ditch near the eastern boundary (Photo 4).
■ Some minor trash and debris of a non -hazardous nature was observed in the small dunes.
■ An electric utility box was located near the northwestern corner of the site (Photo 2).
Overhead wires and utility poles ran parallel to the wall near the northwest boundary.
Evidence of the onsite disposal of hazardous materials was not observed.
2.3 Site Vicinity
The .site vicinity consists of residential, commercial and golf club properties. The parcels beyond
the west end of the north boundaryand west of Desert Club Drive. are vacant. A residential
neighborhood is north of the,site (Photos 1 & 2). Evidence was not observed that the site was
adversely affected by properties in the site vicinity.
2.4 Geology and Hydrogeolo
The site is located in the Coachella Valley of Southern California. The Coachella Valley is part
of the tectonically active Salton Trough, which is a'closed, internally draining basin bounded by
the San. Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest, the San Bernardino Mountains to the
northwest, and the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains to the northeast and east.
These mountain ranges, and the basement rock underlying the Coachella Valley, are primarily
composed of granitic and metamorphic rock. Within, the Coachella Valley, the basement
complex is overlain. by a series of unconsolidated and semi -consolidated continental clastic
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
December 10, 2002 - 4 - File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
sediments eroded from the surrounding mountain ranges, lacustrine deposits of ancient Lake
Cahuilla, and wind-blown sand deposited in the active blow -sand area of Riverside County
(DWR, 1964). The site is located on alluvial fan deposits.
The northwest trending San Andreas Fault zone is the major geologic feature of the Coachella
Valley. The Banning, Mission Creek, and Garnet Hill faults, which are part of the San Andreas
Fault system, divide the Coachella Valley into four distinct hydrogeologic subbasins. Each
subbasin is further divided into subareas, based on the type of water -bearing formation, water
quality, areas of confined groundwater, forebay areas, groundwater divides, or surface water
divides. The site is located within the Thermal subarea of the Indio subbasin. This subarea
consists of the confined portion of the Indio subbasin, where water from the up -gradient Palm
Springs subarea moves into the interbedded sands, silts and clays underlying the central portion
of the valley. Groundwater in this subarea generally flows in a southeasterly direction toward the
Salton Sea. The water bearing materials in this area have been divided into four units: a semi -
perched zone at the ground surface, extending to a depth of up to 100 feet; an upper aquifer
which is 150 to 300 feet thick; a lower aquifer in, excess of 500 feet thick; and an aquitard
between these two aquifers which is 100 to 200 feet thick. The semi -perched zone may -be the
uppermost water -bearing zone under the site. Water quality within this zone is generally poor.
The deeper and upper aquifers are typically used for water supply. Throughout the Thermal
subarea, the horizontal permeability is several times the vertical permeability resulting in a
predominantly lateral flow of groundwater (DWR, 1964).
' The depth to groundwater at the site was evaluated by contacting the Coachella Valley Water
District (CVWD). Mr. William. Gonzalez of the CVWD indicated the depth to groundwater
averaged 146 feet in 2001 in a well located less than 0.5 mile north of the site. Note that the
' CVWD obtains well information from production wells that tend to tap the deeper aquifers, and
may not represent upper -most groundwater.
3.0. HISTORICAL INFORMATION
Information regarding the history of the site was obtained from historical aerial photographs,
topographic maps, and Munger Oil maps. The results of this research are summarized below.
3.1 Aerial Photographs
ESSW aerial photo archives were reviewed to evaluate the history of the site, and vicinity, with
particular attention to indications of the potential use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials.
Seven sets of photographs for the years 1955, 1973, 1982, 1984, 1990, 1995, and 2000 were
reviewed (see references). Our interpretations of these photographs are presented below in
chronological order:
• In 1955, most of the site appears to be a barren agricultural field. A house is located near
the center of the west boundary on the locationof the rubble noted during the site visit.
The area west of the site is developed with residential roadways and a moderate number
of homes. Agricultural land is south and east of the site. A residential neighborhood to
the north had not developed beyond completion of the roadways. Desert Club Drive is an
established dirt road along the west boundary. Avenue 52 does not connect/exist along
the south boundary, but is at a distance to the south.
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
December 10, 2002 - 5 File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726,
' • 1973 the fields do not appear to have been used ` In pp s for agriculture for some time. The
fields appear overblown with sand. The house is still visible near the west boundary.
' The extended vicinity appears generally unchanged.
• In 1982 and 1984, vegetation on site appears to be thicker, though the site is otherwise.
' generally unchanged. Residential development west of the site has continued, and Desert
Club Drive is paved.
• In 1990,. areas of the site along Desert Club Drive have been cleared of vegetation, and a
footpath is visible along the north boundary. The remainder of the site is generally
unchanged. Fritz Burns Park has been constructed southwest of the site, and construction
of a gated community with golf course is underway south of Avenue 52.
• In 1995, the site is generally unchanged. Avenue 52, a two-lane divided highwayjs
' reconfigured, now defining the south boundary of the site. Residential development north
and west of the site has continued. The gated community to ,the south is. still under
development.
• By 2000, the block wall had been built along the northern and part of the western site
boundaries. The vegetation around the perimeter of the site was gone, and greatly thinned
at the center of the site. Vehicle tracks were visible across the center of the site. The
house was still on site.
3.2 Topographic Maps
Topographic maps produced by the U.S.G.S. were reviewed for information concerning the
' development history of the site. The 7.5-minute La Quinta California Quadrangle, dated 1959
and photo -revised in 1980, was reviewed. This map depicts the site as developed with one
house. The vicinity is depicted as partly developed as residential. By 1980, no changes are
depicted on site. Development of the vicinity had continued, including two houses along the
north boundary.
' 3.3 Munger Oil Maps
The Munger Oil map book was reviewed for information regarding historic oil -well drilling
' activities near the site. The map book did not depict oil wells having been drilled within 1 mile
of the site.
4.0 AGENCY INFORMATION
4.1 Agency Database Search Report -
' A report summarizing the information available from regulatory agencies regarding sites, which
generate; store, use, and/or have released hazardous materials was obtained from Track Info.
' Services LLC (AKA Environmental FirstSearch or., FirstSearch), a firm. that specializes in
maintaining a database of this type of information. The publications referenced by FirstSearch,
are listed in the FirstSearch report, which is presented in Appendix C. The search radii used for
' each list were in accordance with ASTM guidelines. The information obtained during this
review is summarized below.
' EARTH SYSTEMS, SOUTHWEST
December 10, 2002 - 6 - File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
' The site is not listed in the FirstSearch report.
' Nine sites are listed within the search radii. Six of the sites are listed as having registered
underground storage tanks. The other three listings refer to leaking underground storage
tank sites, two of which are listed as case closed and not considered a threat to the subject
' site. The third listing is for the Circle K at 78110 Calle Tampico, which is 0.5 mile
northwest of the site. The site status is listed as Preliminary Site Assessment underway.
As discussed in Section 4.2, no indications of groundwater contamination were found at
that site. Based on the distance and status of these sites, they do not appear to ,pose a risk
to the subject site.
' 4.2 Agency Interviews
Ms. Linda Shurlow with the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health was
contacted regarding known problems at the site or in the site vicinity. Ms. Shurlow reported that
she was not aware of any problems at the site, and the only site in the vicinity that she was aware
of is the Circle K site mentioned above. She said that groundwater contamination was not found
when the tank was removed, but this site is now under the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) jurisdiction. ESSW reviewed the RWQCB file for Circle K for another project within
the last few months, and no indications of groundwater contamination were found in the file for
' that site at that time.
' The Building Department and Fire Department did not have historical records pertaining to the
site. A Building Department representative indicated that the block wall along the site boundary
was built in 1992.
Ms. Carolyn Brown with the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office (RCAC) was
contacted previously for general information regarding pesticide use. Ms. Brown indicated that
the pesticide DDT was widely used throughout the Coachella Valley prior to it's ban in the early
1970's. Consequently, it should be assumed that DDT could have been used on all properties
used for agriculture prior to that time.
Mr. Jim Ray with the RCDEH was previously contacted regarding the RCDEH's approach to
DDT at agricultural sites. Mr. Ray indicated that in agricultural soils, which contain DDT as a
result of legal use, they do not require that anything be done to clean up these sites, even as they
are developed for other uses. However, he stated that if soils containing DDT (and by-products)
in excess of the 1 mg/kg regulatory limit are exported off -site, they would need to be treated as
hazardous waste in accordance with Title 22. More recently, Mr. Ray has indicated that he
thought it would be prudent to test soils for pesticide residues if the property was going to be
developed for residential use, to evaluate the potential for exposure to the future residences.
However, he also indicatedthat he had no authority to require such testing.
4.3 Other Sources of Information
Information regarding DDT was obtained from the reference books "Agricultural Chemicals:
Book I - Insecticides." That reference indicates that DDT is one of the most widely used
insecticides in the world. It is stable under most conditions, and accumulates in the body fat of
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
' December 10; 2002
1
1
11
-7-
File No.: 08957-01
02-12-726
animals and in the soil. In other. countries, it.is used as a human -body insecticide (applied to
people to kill lice, etc.).
In other references:
• The half-life of DDT in soil has been estimated to be about 30 years under normal conditions
(Saltzman and Yaron, 1986). A shorter half life can be obtained under optimum conditions.
' • A 1985 study by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDF&A) found DDT
and it's breakdown by-products in 95 of 97 soil samples collected from' agricultural soils
throughout California, typically at concentrations of about 1 mg/kg" or less. The highest
' concentration detected was 31 mg/kg (total DDT and -it's breakdown by-products) in a sample
from Los Angeles.County.
DDT is listed as a hazardous material in the California Code of Regulations governing the
classification of hazardous waste (CCR Title 22). The Total Threshold Limit Concentration for
DDT and it's breakdown by-products is 1 mg/kg, which is the concentration of DDT which
would classify a waste as hazardous.
The US EPA Preliminary Remediation Goal (FRG), for DDT is 1.7 mg/kg in aTesidential setting.
The PRG is a value based on. health risks from exposure to the substance in a residential setting
for 70 years (US EPA 2000).
' Mr. Tom Brickley' with Brickley Environmental, an asbestos removal contractor, was contacted
during a previous project regarding the use of asbestos piping in irrigation systems. Mr. Brickley
indicated that they have been involved in the removal of asbestos -containing irrigation piping.at
numerous sites, and that finding this type of piping common. He also stated that these pipes are
not considered a hazardous material and can be left in place, but are often removed due to
engineering and site development considerations. If the pipes are removed, the removal needs to
' be performed by a licensed asbestos contractor and disposed to a permitted landfill following
appropriate protocols. The costs to remove and dispose of the asbestos pipe is dependent upon
the condition it is in, but he stated that pipe in good condition can be removed for an average cost
of about $500.to $2,000 per 100 linear feet of pipe.
Mr. Bob Sheppard with CV Grading, a contractor that installs irrigation systems, was contacted
' during a previous project for. information regarding typical uses of asbestos -cement (AC) pipe.
He indicated that AC pipe is used in irrigation systems when the pressure is anticipated to exceed
the design strength of common concrete pipe. Commonly used concrete pipe has a design
strength sufficient for 'a hydrostatic head of about 20 feet, while AC pipe can have design
strengths of 50 to 100 feet of hydrostatic head. AC pipe is more expensive than common
' concrete pipe, and therefore AC pipe is usually used only when the head is anticipated to exceed
20 feet of head. Non -pressurized gravity feed irrigation systems are usually constructed of non -
asbestos concrete pipe.
5.0. _ SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This report presents the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted
by Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) for the proposed Arnold Palmer's Restaurant, 78-164
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
' December 10 2002 -.8 - File No.: -
" �i�57 01 ,
02-12-726
Avenue 52, APNs 770-190-001, 770-181-002, -003, & -004, La Quetta, California. The purpose
of this assessment was to evaluate the potential for the presence of soil, or groundwater'
' contamination 'because of past use, handling, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or
petroleum products on or near the subject property. The scope of work for this evaluation
included a reconnaissance of the site and vicinity, a review of the history of the site, and a review
' of information obtained from regulatory agencies regarding the use, storage, generation, or
release of hazardous materials on the site or in the site vicinity. Based on'this review, ESSW
presents the following summary and conclusions:
1. The site generally consists of vacant .and formerly agricultural land with an approximately.
6-foot high wall along the northern and part of the • western boundaries of the site.
' Uprooted trees and yard waste were deposited in a ditch near the eastern boundary.
Minor debris noted in the small dunes on site does not appear 'to contain hazardous
materials. Further investigations regarding these materials do not appear warranted from
a hazardous -materials perspective.
2. A residence was present on the site near the west boundary from at least 1,955 until 2000.
The building was •razed within the last two years. A septic system may have been
associated with that residence, but residential septic systems are not considered issues of
concern from a hazardous materials perspective.
3. The site was used for agriculture in 1955, the earliest reference available. Therefore, the
' potential exists for residues of DDT to be present at the site. The RCDEH has previously
indicated that residues of pesticides that result from their application as ,part of farming
operations are not classified as a hazardous material, unless soil is .going to be exported
' from the site (at which time it falls under the waste classification criteria). More recently,
the RCDEH has indicated that they feel it would be prudent to analyze soils for pesticide
residues at sites proposed for residential development (though they have no authority to
require such testing). If this is of concern to you, or if development plans call fore
exporting soil from the site, you may wish to collect soil samples from, the agricultural
fields and test them for the presence of pesticides (specifically DDT). This does not.
appear to be an issue for the site due to the proposed use as commercial property, and
because it appears unlikely that soil" will need to be exported from the site to
accommodate development.
4. No evidence of an .irrigation system was observed on site. The potential exists for .
p ,
asbestos -cement (AC) pipe to be present in an onsite irrigation system, if one is present.
1 However, *AC pipe is not normally used in gravity -flow irrigation systems, which would
be used on.a site as flat as this one. Therefore, we believe the potential is low for AC
pipe to be present in the onsite irrigation system.
5.' The site vicinityconsists primarily of residential and golf course properties. Evidence
p Y g p p
was not observed that the site was adversely affected by activities in the site vicinity.
' 6. The site was not identified in the 'a enc database review. Other sites identified in the
• - g Y.
agency database review do not appear to pose a risk to the subject site.
' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
' December 10 2002 - 10 - File No.: 08957-01;
02-12-726
REFERENCES
Brickley, Tom, with Brickley Environmental, personal interview, February 24, 1998. ,
r
Brown, Carolyn, RCAC, personal communication, July 17, 1997.
California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (for TTLC values).
' California Department of Food and Agriculture, 1985. Agricultural Sources of DDT -Residues in
California's Environment dated September 1985.
California Department of Water Resources (DWR), 1964,' Bulletin Number 108 - Coachella
Valley;Investigation,.July 1964
ESSW, aerial photograph archives, as listed below:
Date
Source/Flight
Frame'
Approximate Scale
1955
- -
- -
1"
= 11,000,
4-11-73
DeBonne
12
1"
= 5,000'
1982
CVWD
- -
1I
1;000,
1-20-84
RCFCD ..
822,823
1"
= 1,150'
1-15-90
RCFCD
13-78, 13-79
1"
= 1,600'
3-18-95
RCFCD
.13-71, 13-12
1"
= 1,600'
3-14-00
RCFCD
13-75, 13-76
1"
= 1007
Gonzalez, William, Coachella Valley Water'Distriet, phone, interview, December 6, 2002.
' Munger Map Book, 1997" California - Alaska Oil and Gas Fields: .
Ray, Jim, RCDEH, personal communication, July 21, 1997.
Shurlow, Linda Riverside Count Department of Environmental Health hone interview,
Y P p
December5, 2002.
Track Info Services LLC, Environmental FirstSearch Report, dated December 5, 2002. ,
United States Geologic Survey, 7.5 minute La -Quinta, California Quadrangle, 1959, photo -
revised 1980. '
' EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
I; P
_j
3
4V
L
C
ter
�41VJII
Water Well-
Iz.
tu:
t I /Y
to
we
40 -4
0
Li
4
6
a t
W,
r C�CD� I
_j I :�LCI
711
D.
r �C �
BM _.R
_7
II
pre.,
8
II
W DIF W ����lL
aC,•l�L.] rs�te . J j)o� �1(I.
...........
I. _j k Pu�
rI H
La Quinta:
'N
F
J�
t
6— IJ
' � s o� �I �= .�U� . t I .'. I`= i � a�LJ � I � - � t � ��lh`v'' ! 1 -�.�' C 4 ? , Ifr!(
2
D��.---�i}1, .i�lf,���-,����.�. �1 •1�1 -� �'\�1;c i/�L� 1`'I�l� `'"s�,;`�rj��=.:
L-i�� � '` ` _ -;. I I In il• .I• l�/�-.��..�� 1ul �o• fl:l(�)C�,I)����:��r I,r �t: t.:�:�:.:;��>:�_:,
16
Base Map: USGS 7-1/2' Quadrangle-, La Quinta,` California, 1959, Photo -revised 1980.
LEGEND Figure 1 -Site Location
Site Boundary Proposed Arnold Palmer Restaurant
78-164 Avenue 52,.,La Quinta, CA
Project Number. 08957-01
Scale: 1" 2000" Earth Systems
0 2000 4000 Southwest
c
1 1
k
tit;
1
1 `1
}'
1 1 't .5 , •
SourceRiverside County Flood Control'Dstnct;:3 14 00,;
.
Y
County Wide Flight.Feame 13-75 .
r, , LEGEND
Figure 2 ;Site Layout 4
— Site Boundary
�ProposedaArnold Palmer Restaurant
�
78-1'64. Avenue 52, La Quinta,;'CA
Project` Number: -0895T 01
ApproXimate Scale
1" 356-
Earth Systems
y
.0 350
700
Southwest b
� Y t
f
Elk
t
, �
����.rT-'�+�}p�"'
.
'
Q�t
= ..� _=�T*-1 ril• 4�}`,``~� 4-M «-Y_ 1���` `W���.yy `1. ..
ey��wr r -� `.. de`73 . !` 4'�C"' # � tq+, � k �� Y a`f'. Gh• � # A !'x'+ Y.y,.w M
jra. ♦ y�� ys ,.(..� 4 J t=, �Dc" i •H�p�
•_
-' � y Ar E .d" $"L'i .tea �•f
$
c
X
itG
'
Photo 3. Concrete rubble at location of former residence.
View is to east.
♦
' ' � �1 . ,, j� �w -n, .. • .. r ..rr ,T ... ' _.. ,. J w i -�'�n �.r w��,� . ;~.S�i,
'
. n ~,: ;:�4r �.L' .�r4►i E. ter'.. t'
•
f =� �� ✓(��£�nr r Oft '•"�" ! fo(J!,'$�
Photo 4. Tree roots in ditch near eastern boundary. View is
'
to northwest
p; Earth Systems
' Southwest
TARGET PROPERTY:
78-164 AVENUE 52 -
LA QUINTA CA 92253
Job Number: 08951-01
PREPARED FOR:
Earth Systems Southwest
797811 B Country Club. Drive
Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201
12-05-02
' Enviraninent� �' �"
FIRSTS W.
Tel: (619) 562-4842 Fax: (619) 562-4844
Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
1
C/a' Environmental FirstSearch
..
1 Mile Radius FIRSTS' {
ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites
76=164 AVENUE 52 ,-LA QUINTA CA 92253 ,
Source: 1999 U.S. Census TIGER Files
Target Site (Latitude: 33.672744 Longitude:-116.301627) ........
Identified Site, Multiple Sites; Receptor .......'.........:..........
NPL, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste .............................
Railroads ....::.................................
...................... ................. ......................
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environr�iental FirstSearch
,:5 Mile Radius
9,, FIRSTS
ASTM Map:,CERCLIS; RCRATSD,, LUST, SWL
78-164 AVENUE 52 LA ,QUINTA CA 92253 J
Environmental FirstSearch . Fr
En..,mnmen
:25 Mile Radius , '-FIRSTS s
ASTM Map: RCRAGENY, ERNS,°UST';
79-164 AVENUE 52 , LA QUINTA CA 92253. `
Environmental FirstSearch
Search Summary Report
Target Site: 78-164 AVENUE 52
LA QUINTA CA 92253
FirstSearch Summary
Database
Sel
Updated
Radius
Site
. 1/8
1/4
1/2
1/2 >
ZIP
TOTALS
NPL
Y
09-10-02
.1.00,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CERCLIS
Y
09-10-02
0.50
0
0
0
0
-
0
0`
RCRA TSD'
Y
08-08-02
0.50
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
RCRA COR
Y
08-08-02
1.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RCRA GEN
Y
08-08-02
0.25
0
0
0
-
-
0
0
ERNS
Y
12-31=01 ..
0.12
0
0
State Sites
Y
10-25-00
1.00
0
0
0
0'
0
0
0
Spills-1990
Y
01-15-02
0.12
0
0
-
-
-
0
0
SWL
Y
12-02-02
0.50
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
Permits
Y
12-11-01
0.12
0
0
-
-
-
0
0
Other
Y
01-11-01
0.12
0
.0
-
-
0
0
REG UST/AST
Y
10-22-02
0.25
0
0
1
-
5
6
Leaking UST,
Y
07-11-02
0.50
0
0
I
2
-
0
3
- TOTALS-
0
0
2
2
0
6
10
Notice of Disclaimer
Due to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently
available to TRACK Info Services, certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency
sites residing in TRACK Info Services' databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by "a rectangle approximating their
location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most
latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other
sites are.depicted by a point representing their, approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the
associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for
such information.
Waiver of Liability
Although TRACK Info Services uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, TRACK Info Services does not and'can not
warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of TRACK Info Services' services proceeding
are signifying an understanding of TRACK Info Services' searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability
claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations,
Site Location
Degrees (Decimal) Decrees (Min7Sec) UTMs :
Longitude:-116.301627 116:18:6 Easting: 56474.1.566
' Latitude: 33.672744 33:40:22Northing: 3725896.831
Zone: 11
,• Comment
Comment: PROPOSED:A'RNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
Additional Requests/Services
Environmental .Firsd ea rch
Selected Sites Summary Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52, JOB:
08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
TOTAL:
10
GEOCODED: 4 NON GEOCODED: 6
SELECTED: 9
ID
DB Type
Site Name/ID/Status Address
Dist/Dir' Map ID
-
1
UST
KSL LA QUINTA CITRUS GOLF 78752 AVENUE 52
0.17 NE 2
'
RJVERSIDECO83294 LA QUINTA CA 92253
`
2
LUST
BURNS RANCH 78505 AVENUE 52
0.18 SW 3.
"
7T2253003/CASE CLOSED LA QUINTA CA 92253
4
LUST
CIRCLE K #457 78110 CALLE TAMPICO
0.48 NW: I '
7T2253002/CASE CLOSED LA QUINTA CA 92253
3
LUST
CIRCLE K #457 78110 CALLE TAMPICO
0.48 NW 1
'
7T2253008/PRELIM. SITE ASSES. LA QUINTA CA 92253
e
Environmental FirstSearch
Selected Sites Summary Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT,
TOTAL: 10 GEOCODED: 4 NON GEOCODED: 6 SELECTED: 9
' ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir Map ID
6 UST BLACK GOLD 77985 AVENIDA MONTE NON GC
TISID-STATE3658UACTIVE LA QUINTA CA 92253
7 UST COUNTY OF R VERSIDE FIRE LA QUINTA 78136 AVENUE 52 NON GC
RIVERSIDECO82897 LA QUINTA CA 92253
' 8 UST FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK 78042 AVENUE 52 NON GC
RIVERSIDECO85666 LA QUINTA CA 92253
'9 UST KSL DESERT RESORTS,INC. LA QUINTA M 77550 CALLE TAMPICO NON GC RIVERSIDECO83295 LA QUINTA CA 92253
10 UST LA QUINTA HOTEL GOLF CLUB 77550 CALLE TAMPICO NON GC . }
T'ISID-STATE36906/ACTIVE LA QUINTA CA 92253',
t
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
. LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
1
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
. LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 7
DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FIRE LA QUINTA #32 REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 78136 AVENUE 52
ID1: RIVERSIDECO82897
LA QUINTA CA 92253
I132:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 8
DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: FRITZ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 78042 AVENUE 52
1D1: RNERSIDECO85666
LA QUINTA CA 92253
1D2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 9 DIST/DIR:
NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: KSL DESERT RESORTS,INC. LA QUINTA MOUNTAIN GOLF
REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 77550 CALLE TAMPICO
ID1: RIVERSIDEC083295
LA QUINTA CA 92253
ID2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report "
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 10 DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: LA QUINTA HOTEL GOLF CLUB REV: 01/01/94
ADDRESS: 77550 CALLE TAMPICO IDI: TIS1D-STATE36906
LA QUINTA CA 92253 ID2:
Riverside STATUS: ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an
index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details
regarding the sites were never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. r
The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency
no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The.last release of that 1994 database'Nvas in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within Califomia is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county govemment agencies. As of 1998,
all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in
this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their'location were upgraded or removed in adherence Nvith the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that
were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by•Track Info Services. This may occur if a tank was removed prionto development of recent
CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA.
Site Details Page 3
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
` TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 ' JOB 08957-01
■ LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SITE
.SEARCH ID: 5
DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: UNK
REV:
ADDRESS:. WASHINGTON ST I MI S OF HWY I I I IDI: 109784
LA QUINTA CA 92253,
ID2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:. UNKNOWN
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE -
Environmental Firsdearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: '78-164.'AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
i LA QUINTA CA 92253, PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: I
. `DIST/DIR: 0.17 NE MAP ID: •+ 2
NAME: KSL LA QUINTA CITRUS GOLF
REV: 06/14/2000
ADDRESS: 78752 AVENUE 52
ID1: RNERSIDECO83294
LA QUINTA CA 92253•
ID2:
RNERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TANKS LIST INFORMATION
Owner:
La Quin to Resort & Club/C/o Laura Murrilo
Number of Tanks:
3
Environmental FirstSeareh
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52
LA QUINTA CA 92253
JOB: 08957-01
PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.18 SW MAP ID: 3
NAME: BURNS RANCH REV: 07/11/02
ADDRESS: 78505 AVENUE 52 IDI: 7T2253003
LA QUINTA CA,92253 ID2:
RIVERSIDE STATUS: CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUS77S database is not currently being provided
by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with
blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: LOCAL AGENCY
REGIONAL BOARD: COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 89-781
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: BILL YOUNG `
ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 78505 AVENUE 52, LA QUINTA, CA 92253
SITE OPERATOR: BILL YOUNG
WATER SYSTEM: LA QUINTA HOTEL_
CASE NUMBER: 7T2253003
CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY
SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE
SUBSTANCE QUANTITY:
LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN
LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN
HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: SUBSURFACE MONITORING
DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 8111189
HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: REMOVE CONTENTS
STOP DATE (blank if not reported): 8111189 .
STATUS: CASE CLOSED
ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the'reporting agency):
ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all codedranslations have been provided by the reporting agency): NONE TAKEN
DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if not reported): 111165 -
ENTER DATE (blank if not reported): 612194
REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): 7122192 -
DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported):
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN,WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): ^
DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITOROG BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported):. , 7122192 `
REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 8111189
MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration):
MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION:
MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION:
MTBE CNTS: 0
MTBE FUEL: 1
MTBE TESTED:' SITE NOT TESTED FOR MTBE. INCLUDES UNKNOWN AND NOT ANALYZED
MTBE CLASS: '
Selected Site Details Page - 2
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 3 DIST/DIR: 0.48 NW MAP ID: 1
NAME: CIRCLE K #457 REV: 07/11/02
ADDRESS: 78110 CALLE,TAMPICO ID1: 7T2253008
LA QUINTA CA 92253 ID2:
RIVERSIDE !STATUS: PRELIM. SITE ASSES. UNDERWAY
CONTACT: PHONE:
RELEASE DATA FROM THE.CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the L USTIS database is not currently being provided
by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with
blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD
REGIONAL BOARD: COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 94-1142
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: DANFISCHMAN
ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 3525 HYLAND AVENUE
SITE OPERATOR:'
WATER SYSTEM:` COA CHELLA VIVD- CO VE COMMUNITIES
CASE NUMBER: 7772253008
CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY
SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE
SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: "
LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN .
LEAK SOURCE: UD
HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK CLOSURE ;
DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 11110194
HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: CLOSE TANK
STOVDATE (blank if not reported): 11110194
STATUS: PRELIM. SITEASSES. UNDERWAY
ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): EXCAVATEAND
DISPOSE- REMOVE CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DISPOSE IN APPROVED SITE
ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): NONE TAKEN .
DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if not reported): 111165 '
ENTER DATE (blank if not reported): 218195
REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): 5110101 "
DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): 12127194
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): 4114195
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): 8117195
DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported):
DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported):
REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 1212710
MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): 5113199
MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION:
MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: EQUAL TO 23
MTBE CNTS: /
MTBE FUEL: /
MTBE TESTED: YES
MTBE CLASS: '
f.
Selected Site Details Page - 4
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD-PALMER.S RESTAURANT y
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: .4 DIST/DIR: 0.48 NW MAP ID: I
NAME: CIRCLE K#457 REV: 07/11/02
ADDRESS: 78110 CALLE TAMPICO IDI : 7T2253002 .
LA QUINTA CA 92253 ID2:
RIVERSIDE STATUS: CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please notethat some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUS77S database is not cu_ rreridy being provided
by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with ,
blank information following after should be interpreted as.unreported by the agency.
• t
LEAD AGENCY: LOCAL AGENCY
REGIONAL BOARD: COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 89-170
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: CIRCLE K CORPORA TION
ADDRESS OF. RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 58U MANZANITA AVENUE, CARMICHAEL, CA 95608
SITE OPERATOR: D CRAIG CARPENTER
WATER SYSTEM: COACHELLA VWD-COVE COMMUNITIES
CASE NUMBER: 77"2253002 "
CASE TYPE: - SOIL ONLY
SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE
SUBSTANCE QUANTITY:
LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN
LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN
HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK TEST
DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 6114188 ,
HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: REMOVE CONTENTS
STOP DATE (blank if not reported): 6114188
STATUS: CASE CLOSED
ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency):
ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): NONE TAKEN
DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if not reported): 111165
ENTER DATE (blank if not reported): 616194
REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): 218100
DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): 6/14/88
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported)::
DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported): 5/349
REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 6114188
MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration):
MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION:
MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION:
MTBE CNTS: 0
MTBE FUEL: I
MTBE TESTED: SITE NOT TESTED FOR MTBE. INCLUDES UNKNOWN AND NOTANALYZED
MTBE CLASS: '
Environmental FirstSearch
' Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957=01
. LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
.SEARCH ID: 6 DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: BLACK GOLD REV: 01/01/94
ADDRESS: 77985 AVENIDA MONTE IDI: TISID-STATE36581
LA QUINTA CA 92253 ID2:
Riverside STATUS: ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an
index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details
regarding the sites were never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database.
The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB): That agency
no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in.1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998,
all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in
this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that..
were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by Track Info Services. This'may occur if a tank was removed prior to development,ofrecent
CUPA UST lists or never registered with a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE 52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 7
DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FIRE LA QUINTA #32 REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 78136 AVENUE 52
IDI : RIVERSIDECO82897
LA QUINTA CA 92253
ID2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 8
DIST/DIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: FRIT7_ BURNS COMMUNITY PARK REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 78042 AVENUE 52
IDI: RIVERS]DEC085666
LA QUINTA CA 92253
ID2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT:
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
-SEARCH ID: 9 DIST/DIR:
NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: KSL DESERT RESORTS,INC. LA QUINTA MOUNTAIN GOLF
REV: 04/06/2001
ADDRESS: 77550 CALLE TAMPICO
IDI : RIVERSIDECO83295,
LA QUINTA CA 92253
ID2:
RIVERSIDE
STATUS:
CONTACT: •
PHONE:
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE -..
Selected Site Details Page - 6
Environmental FlrstSearclz
Site Detail. Report
TARGET SITE: 78-164 AVENUE.52 JOB: 08957-01
LA QUINTA CA 92253 PROPOSED ARNOLD PALLIER S RESTAURANT. '
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 10 ' DISTIDIR: NON GC MAP ID:
NAME: LA QUINTA HOTEL GOLF CLUB REV: 01/01/94
ADDRESS: 77550 CALLE TAMPICO IDI : TISID-STATE36906
LA QUINTA CA 92253 i "' '1D2:
Riverside STATUS: ACTIVE "
CONTACT: PHONE:
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as'a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an
index of names & locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details
regarding the sites were never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database.'
The SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control.Board (SWRCB). That agency
no longer maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998,
all sites or facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in
this case, CUPA s) that the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with,the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that
were not recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by Track Info Services. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent
CUPA UST lists or never registered with a' CUPA.
j
i
Selected. Site Details Page - 7,
Environmental FirstSearch ,
Federal Databases and Sources
NPL: National Priority List. The EPA's list.of confirmed or.proposed
Superfund sites. Source: Environmental Protection.Agency.
Updated quarterly.
tCERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Information System. The EPA's database of current and
' potential Superfund sites currently or.previously under investigation.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency.
Updated quarterly.
RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. ,The EPA's
database of registered hazardous waste generators and treatment,
' storage and disposal facilities. Included are RAATS (RCRA "
Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring &•
Enforcement List).. Source: Environmental Protection Agency.
' I RCRA.TSD: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. The EPA's database of
RCRIS sites which treat, store, dispose; or incinerate hazardous
waste. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS
detailed data.
RCRA COR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
..Corrective Action Sites. The EPA's database of RCRIS. sites with
reported corrective action. This information is also reported in'•the
standard RCRIS detailed data.
' RCRA GEN: Resource Conservation and Recovery ,Information System
Large and Small Quantity Generators. The EPA's database of RCRIS
sites that create more than.l00kg of hazardous waste per month or
' meet other RCRA requirements. "Included are RAATS (RCRA
Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance
Monitoring & Enforcement List)-
' RCRA NLR:' Resource Conservation and Recovery. Information System
sites No Longer Regulated. The.EPA's database of RCRIS sites that
create less than 1.00kg of hazardous waste per month or do not meet
' other RCRA requirements-
All RCRA databases are Updated quarterly.
ERNS. Emergency Response Notification System. The EPA's database of
•
emergency.response actions. Source: Environmental Protection Agency.
' Updated quarterly.
' RELEASES: Air and Surface Water Releases. A subset.of the EPA's ERNS
database which have impacted only air or surface water.
' Updated semi-annually.
NPDES: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The EPA's
' database of all permitted facilities receiving and discharging
effluents. Source: Environmental Protection Agency.
' Updated semi-annually.
. Y
FINDS- The Facility Index System. The EPA's Index of identification
numbers associated with a property or facility which the EPA has
investigated or has been made aware of.in conjunction with various
regulatory programs. Each record indicates.the EPA office that may
have files on the site or.facility. Source: Environmental Protection.
Agency.
Updated semi-annually.
' TRIS: Toxic Release Inventory System. The EPA's database of all
facilities that have had or may be prone to toxic material releases.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency.
Updated semi-annually.
' ACEC: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. This database contains
state and federally designated area's of environmental concern such as
endanged species habitats, protected open spaces, parks, conservation
areas and wildlife preserves. It also contains contact information for''
' threatened and endangered .species. Source: U•.S. Fish and,Wildlife
Services, Ecological Services Offices;. State GIS Departments.
Updated periodically.
1 ,
Floodplains: 100 year and 500 year flood zone boundaries for select
counties in the United States. Source: Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA).
This database'will be updated as new data becomes available.
Receptors: 1995 .TIGER census listing of schools and hospitals that may
' house individuals deemed sensitive to environmental discharges due to
their fragile immune systems.
' Historic Sites: National Register of Historical Places Database. The
nation's official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation.
Properties listed include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and
objects that are significant in American history, architecture,
' archeology, engineering, and culture. Source: National Park Service.
Updated yearly.
' Wetlands: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service produces information on the
characteristics, extent, and•status of the Nation's wetlands and
deepwater habitats. This data is available for select areas of the.
' United States. Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National
Wetlands Inventory.
This database will be updated.as new data becomes available.
1
Fed Land Use: Federal Land data includes information from the following
government agencies including Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of
Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management, Department_ of Defense, Forest
Service,,Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and the
Tennessee Valley Authority. This database also contains data regarding
wild and scenic rivers. Source: USGS.
Updated periodically.
' ENVIRONMENTAL FIRST SEARCH
CALIFORNIA DATABASES (DB) AND SOURCES
CAL SITES: DB TYPE = ST (STATE SITES)
' Source: The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control
Phone:(916) 323-3400
' The CAL, EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a �-
database of information on properties (or sites) in California where
hazardous substances have been released, or where the potential for such
release exists. The types of properties in, the CALSITES database are.
' categorized as: Annual Work Plan, Backlogged ,,Properties,, Certified /
De -listed Sites, No Further Action, Preliminary Endangerment Assessment'
in Progress, Preliminary Endangerment Assessment' Required, Removal
Action Required, Expedited ' Remedial Action Program, Voluntary Cleanup Program, Deed Restricted Properties, and Referred Properties. For more,
information on individual sites call the number listed above.
CORTESE: DB TYPE = ST (STATE SITES) ,
' Source: The CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control
Phone:(916) 445-6532
' Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the Hazardous Waste and
Substances Sites List has been compiled by Cal/EPA, Hazardous Materials'
Data Management Program. The CAL EPA Dept. of. Toxic Substances Control
compiles information from subsets of the following databases to make up
' the CORTESE list:
1.1 '.The'Dept. of Toxic Substances Control; contaminated or potentially
contaminated hazardous waste sites listed in the CAL Sites database.
Formerly known as ASPIS are included (CALSITES formerly known as ASPIS).
2. The California State Water 'Resources Control Board; listing of
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks are included (LTANK)
' 3. The California Integrated Waste Management Board; Sanitary Landfills
which have evidence of .groundwater contamination or known migration of
hazardous materials (formerly WB LF, now AB.3750).
t Note: Track Info Services collects each of the above data sets
individually and lists them separately in the following First Search
categories in order to provide more current and comprehensive
information.: CALSITES: SPL., LTANK: LUST, WB-LF:.SWL
' SWIS SOLID WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM: DB TYPE SW
(SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES)
Source: The Integrated Waste Management Board Phone:(916) 255-2331
,. The California Integrated Waste Management Board maintainsa database on
solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites. throughout the
' state of California. The types of facilities found in this database
include landfills,• transfer stations, material recovery facilities;
composting sites, transformation facilities, waste.• tire sites, and
closed disposal sites. For more information on individual sites -call the,
tnumber listed above.
Note: This database contains poor site location information for many
sites. in the First Search reports; therefore, it.may not be possible,'to
locate or plot some sites in First .Search reports.
•
WMUDS: DB TYPE = SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES)
Source: The State Water Resources Control Board
'
Phone:(916) 227-4365
The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Waste
Management,
'
Unit Database System (WMUDS). It is no longer updated.
It tracked
management units for several regulatory programs related
to waste
management and its potential impact on groundwater. Two
of these
programs (SWAT & TPCA) are no longer on -going regulatory programs as
described below. Chapter 15 (SC15) is still an on -going
regulatory
program and information is updated periodically but not to
the WMUDS
database. The WMUDS System contains information from the
following
agency databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit (WMU), Waste
'
Discharger System (WDS), SWAT, Chapter 15, TPCA, RCRA, Inspections,
Violations, and Enforcement's.
Note: This database contains poor site location information for many
sites in the First Search reports; therefore, it may not be possible to
locate or plot some sites in First Search reports.
ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS: DB TYPE = SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES)
Source: Orange County Health Dept. Phone:(714) 834-3536
LUSTIS: DB TYPE = LIT (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS)
Source: The State Water Resources Control Board
Phone:(916) 227-4416
The State Water Resources Control Board maintains a database of sites
with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks.
Information for this database is collected from the states regional
boards quarterly and integrated with this database.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEAKING TANKS: DB TYPE = LU
(LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS)
Source: San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health
Phone:(619) 338-2242
Maintains. a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking
underground storage tanks within its HE17/58 database. For more
information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at phone
number listed above.
' SLIC REGIONS 1 - 9: DB TYPE = SP (SPILLS-90)
Source: The CAL EPA Regional Water Quality Control Boards 1 - 9
The California Regional Water Quality Control Boards maintain report of
' sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigation, and cleanups.
For phone number listings of departments within each region visit their
web sites at: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov'/regions.html
' SAN DIEGO COUNTY HE17 PERMITS: DB TYPE = PE (PERMITS)
Source: The San Diego County Depart. Of Environmental Health
' Phone:(619) 338-2211
The HE17/58 database tracks establishments issued permits and the status
of their permits in relation to compliance with federal, state, and
local regulations that the County oversees. It tracks if a site is a
hazardous waste generator, TSD, gas station, has underground tanks,
violations, or unauthorized.releases. For more information on a specific
file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at the phone number listed above.
i I
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMITS:. DB TYPE.. _ 'PE
' (PERMITS),
Source.: San Bernardino County Fire Dept. Phone:(909) 387-3080
Handlers and Generators Permit Information Maintained by .the Hazardous
Materials Div.
LA COUNTY SITE MITIGATION COMPLAINT CONTROL LOG.: DB TYPE = OT
(OTHER•UNIQUE DATABASES)
Source: The LosAngeles County Hazardous Materials Division
' Phone: (323)• 890-7806
The County of Los Angeles Public Health Investigation Compliant Control
Log
ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL .SITE CLEANUPS: DB TYPE OT
(OTHER UNIQUE DATABASES)
Source: Orange County Environmental Health Agency
' Phone:(714) 834-3536 -
f
.,AST ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE = US (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS).
Source: The State•Water Resources Control Board
' Phone:(916) 227-4364
The. Above `Ground Petroleum Storage Act became State Law effective
January 1, 1990. In general, the 'law requires owners or operators of
AST's with petroleum products to file a storage statement and pay a fee
by July 1, 1990 and every two years thereafter, take specific action to
prevent spills, and in certain instances implement a groundwater
' monitoring program. This law does not apply'. to that. portion of a. tank
facility associated with the'production oil and regulated.by the State
Division of Oil and Gas of the Dept. of Conservation.
SWEEPS / FIDS STATE REGISTERED'UNERGOROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE'= US
Source: CAL EPA.Dept.of Toxic Substances Control
Phone:(916)227-4404
Until 1994 the State Water Resources. Control Board maintained a.database
of registered 'underground storage tanks statewide referred to as the
SWEEPS System. The SWEEPS UST informatiori was integrated with the CAL' '
EPA's Facility Index System database`(FIDS). which is•a master .index of
information from numerous California• agency environmental databases.. .
That was last updated in 1994.. Track Info Services included. the UST
L_
CUPA DATABASES & SOURCES
(DB TYPE = US (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS)
DEFINITION OF A CUPA: A Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) is a
local agency that has been certified by the CAL EPA to implement six
state environmental programs within the local agency's jurisdiction..
These can be a county, city, or JPA (Joint Powers Authority). This
program was established under the amendments to the California Health
and Safety Code made by SB 1082 in 1994.
A 'Participating Agency (PA) is a local agency that has •been designated
by ,the local CUPA to administer one or more Unified Programs within
their jurisdiction on behalf of the CUPA. A Designated Agency (DA) is an
agency that has not been certified by° the CUPA but is the responsible
local agency that would implement the six unified programs until they
are certified.
Please Note: Track Info Services, LLC collects and maintains information
regarding Underground Storage Tanks from majority of the CUPAS and
Participating Agencies in the State of California. These .agencies
typically do not maintain nor release ,such information on a uniform or
consistent schedule; therefor, currency of the data may vary. Please
look at the details on, a specific site with a UST record in the First
Search Report to determine .the actual currency date of the record as
provided by the relevant agency. Numerous .efforts are made on a regular
basis to obtain updated records.
ALAMEDA COUNTY CUPA'S
* County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health `
* Cities of Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore / Pleasanton, Newark,
Oakland, San Leandro, Union
ALPINE COUNTY CUPA
* Health Department (Only updated by agency annually)
AMADOR COUNTY CUPA
* County. of Amador Environmental Health Department
BUTTE COUNTY CUPA
* County of Butte Environmental Health Division (Only updated by agency
biannually)
CALAVERAS COUNTY CUPA
* County of Calaveras Environmental Health Department
COLUSA COUNTY CUPA
* Environmental Health Dept.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CUPA
* Hazardous Materials Program
DEL NORTE COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of Health and Social Services
EL DORADO COUNTY CUPA'S* County of E1 Dorado. Environmental Health -
Solid Waste Div (Only updated by agency annually)
* County of E1 Dorado EMD.Tahoe Division
(Only updated by agency annually)
FRESNO COUNTY CUPA
* Haz. Mat and Solid Waste Programs
GLENN COUNTY CUPA '
* Air Pollution Control District
HUMBOLDT COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental.Health Division
IMPERIAL COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of Planning and Building
INYO COUNTY CUPA .(US)
* Environmental Health Department
KERN COUNTY.CUPA (US) -'
*"County of Kern Environmental.Health Department
' * City of Bakersfield Fire Department
KINGS COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Services
' LAKE COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Division of Environmental Health e.
LASSEN COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of -Agriculture.
' LOS ANGELES COUNTY CUPA'S (US)
* County of Los Angeles Fire Department
* County of Los Angeles Environmental,Programs Division
* Cities of Burbank, E1 Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach/Signal Hill, Los
Angeles,Pasadena, Santa Fe Springs,'Santa Monica," Torrance', Vernon
MADERA COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Department
' MARIN COUNTY CUPA (US)
* County of Marin Office of Waste Management
*.City of San'Rafael Fire Department
' MARIPOSA -COUNTY CUPA (US) y'
* Health Department
MENDOCINO COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Department
' MERCED COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Division of Environmental Health
MODOC COUNTY CUPA (US) `
* Department of Agriculture
' MONO COUNTY CUPA .(US)
Health Department.
MONTEREY COUNTY CUPA (US)
' * Environmental Health Division
NAPA COUNTY CUPA (US)'
* Hazardous Materials Section
NEVADA COUNTY CUPA (UST)
Environmental Health,Department
ORANGE COUNTY CUPA'S (US)
*County of Orange Environmental Health Department
' * Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana
* County of Orange Environmental Health Department
,PLACER COUNTY CUPA (US)
* County of Placer Division of Environmental Health Field'Office
* Tahoe City A
* City of Roseville Roseville Fire Department
PLUMAS COUNTY CUPA (UST)
* Environmental'Health Department
' RIVERSIDE. COUNTY CUPA (US)" ,
* Environmental Health Department
SACRAMENTO COUNTY (US)
' *.County Environmental Mgmt Dept, Haz. Mat. Div.
SAN BENITO.COUNTY CUPA (US)
* City of Hollister Environmental Service Department
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUPA'S (US).'
' * County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Haz. Mat. Div. ;
* City of Hesperia Hesperia Fire Prevention Department
City of Victorville-Victorville Fire Department
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CUPA (US)
* The"San Diego County..Dept. of Environmental Health HE 17/58
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of Public Health
' SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CUPA (US) -
Environmental Health Division
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CUPA'S (:US)
* County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division
* City of San'Luis Obispo. City Fire Department
SAN MATEO COUNTY CUPA,(US)
* Environmental Health Department
t SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CUPA (US) M
* Cc Fire Dept Protective Services Div
SANTA CLARA COUNTY CUPA!S (US)
* County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division
' * Santa Clara Co Central Fire Prot. Dist. (Covers Campbell, Cupertino,•
Los Gatos, & Morgan Hill)
* Cities of Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose -Fire,
Santa Clara, Sunnyvale
' SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Department
SHASTA COUNTY CUPA (US)
' Environmental Health Department
SIERRA COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Health Department
SISKIYOU COUNTY'CUPA (US)
' * Environmental Health. Department
SONOMA COUNTY CUPA'S (US)
* County of Sonoma Department Of Environmental.Health
' Cities of Healdsburg / Sebastapol, Petaluma, Santa Rosa '
STANINSLAUS'COUNTY +CUPA (US)
*Dept. of Env. Rsres. Haz.'.Mat. Div.
SUTTER COUNTY CUPA (US)
' * Department of Agriculture
TEHAMA COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of Environmental Health
TRINITY COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Department of Health
' TULARE COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Department
' TUOLUMNE COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health
VENTURA COUNTY CUPA'S (BWT UST'S & CERTIFIED UST'S).
* County of Ventura Environmental Health Division
* Cities of. Oxnard, Ventura.
YOLO COUNTY CUPA (US)
* Environmental Health Department
YUBA COUNTY CUPA (US)
*.Yuba County of Emergency Services
Environmental FirstSearch
'
Street Name
Report for Streets within
.25 Mile(s) of Target Property
'
TARGET SITE:
78-164 AVENUE 52
JOB: 08957-01.
LA QUINTA CA 92253'
PROPOSED ARNOLD PALMER S RESTAURANT
Street Name
Dist/Dir
Street Name Dist/Dir
'
52nd Ave
0.01 SE
'
Avenida Bermudas
0.12 -W
Avenida Navarro
0.17 -W
'
Avenida Nuestra
0.17 NE
Avenida Villa
0.21 -W
Birkdale Ct
0.24 SE
'
Calle Amigo
0.01 NE
Calle Barcelona
0.08 NE
Calle Cadiz
0.14 NE
Calle Durango
0.19 SW
Calle Estado
0.22 N-
Calle Fortuna
0.21 NE
Calle Guatemala
0.17 NE
'
Calle Hidalgo
0.15 NW
'
Calle Hueneme .
0.22 NE
Calle Sinaloa
0.12 SW
Drive West
. 0.24 SE
'Deacon
Del Gato Dr
0.24 SE
Desert Club Dr
0.01 NE
Francis Hack Ln
0.15 SE
i
,
r. -
r
APPENDIX D
'QUALIFICATIONS
STATEMENT
EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST
r=' EARTH SYSTEMS" SOUTHWEST a z4
y QUALIFICATIONS 'STATEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL WJ ` K OR_
The principals of the.. Earth Systems companies have, been ;consulting for an average�of over,
20 years,. and the combined staff numbers nearly. 100. Earth Systems'. multidisciplinary 4*'
iofessional staff has'extensive•e.x enence with and education in chemist geology', eophysics, '
P P �', g gY, g x
y hydrogeology, mechanical- engineering,: civil engineering, mapping, soil science, drafting; and.,, s
c ,y.., F
surveying:' , ur `senior project and staff professionals include Certified Engineering Geologists,
r • Regis tered'Geologists, .Registered •Environmental Assessors, and Professional Engineers' »These '.
professionals are highly. qualified; holding an average of two registrations and/or certifications in r ,
their "Area* of'iexpertise: .To continue .to meet our commitment'`to technical' expertise-',, `Earth.
Systems considers; it essential to Grain our' personnel - in the latest scientific advancements in
s assessment and mitigation techniques: This involves continuing educatio i'in the fb' ' of training'
seminars, literature..reviews; and pertment:conferences�to remain abreast of re centwdevelopments
4 in this complex, and rapidlychanging field. » x ,
t rs >
The' attached resumes describe.the crederitials'of the professionals who performed field; research
and/or report preparation work on the project.
Jc
- .r : r `,' y i t ✓ . - _ ! , yr t r �t ti, S .
' y -.y M R 'r • r »�- x.F 1; •,, i •". • - A, 1. L..j
.. r4k , • , .. .. '6 .. 1',:! - _ , E. . �. � .r•',` 1.
i_� #• r• � Ri. .d - ' .. ti r ` • •' ... 4 ,4 : � ' rT o a T itt .
' _ .. EARTH SYSTEMS. SOUTHWEST
Earth SystemsSouthwest
SCOT A. STORMO, RG, CHG, REA II
Vice. President
Associate Geologist/Hydrogeologist
QUALIFICATIONS
Registered Geologist, State of California-, 1990 (No. 4826)
Certified Hydrogeologist, State of California, 1995 (No. 204)
California Registered Environmental Assessor (REA II), 2001 (No. 20166)
California Registered Environmental Assessor (REA 1),.1990 to 1995 (No. 2356)
OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Course, Hazardous Materials -and Site Investigations
(OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120[e]),,l 987, 8-hour refresher courses.taken annually
Princeton Groundwater, 1994
Short course: Groundwater Pollution and Hydrology
National Ground Water Association, 2000
Short Course: Geophysics for Environmental and Groundwater Applications
M. S. Geology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1984
B. S. Geology, California Lutheran College, Thousand Oaks, California, 198-1,
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE '
1997 to present Vice President Earth Systems Southwest'
Bermuda Dunes
1991 to 1997 Senior. Geologist Dames & Moore
Spokane, Washington
Ontario, California
1989 to 1991 Senior Project Geologist Exceltech, Inc.
Irvine, California
1986 to 1989 Staff Geologist. a Leighton & Associates
Riverside, California
'1985 to 1986 Consulting Geologist Epoch Well, Logging
Ventura, California
Employed with Earth 'Systems' Bermuda Dunes office since 1997,. Mr. Stormo is manager of our
environmental services department. In this capacity, he directs all aspects of our environmental
operations including performingwater resource evaluations, and conducting investigations into the
presence, source, and extent of hazardous materials. and contaminants in soil and groundwater. Mr.
Stormo has been providing .geologic and hydrogeologic consulting services to a wide variety of clients
since 1985. His involvement with contaminated sites has included .performing numerous investigations
related to landfills, leaking .underground storage tanks, and properties of industrial, commercial,
educational, residential, and agricultural usage. He has also been active in water supply and groundwater
protection evaluations; providing advice to water supply organizations, Indian tribes, and governmental
agencies. As a registered hydrogeologist, his expertise includes groundwater modeling and groundwater
plume evaluations.
Scot A. Stormo page 2
continued
HIGHLIGHTS OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND EXPERIENCE
• Conducts groundwater and surface water supply evaluations involving assessment of both quantity
and quality.
• Develops watershed management, monitoring and protection strategies.
• Performs water quality monitoring of both surface water and groundwater resources.
• Conducts preliminary site assessments (Phase I) entailing site reconnaissance, historical research,
regulatory agency records and database searches, aerial photograph review, and final report
preparation.
• Performs site characterizations (Phase II) entailing subsurface exploration, sampling of soil and
groundwater, chemical analyses of samples, evaluation of laboratory data, preparation of final report
including recommendations for remediation.
• Designs and implements remediation programs such .as groundwater monitoring and sampling;
delineation of contaminant plumes; monitoring well installation and developments; in situ and above
ground bioremediation systems; vapor extraction and soil venting systems; thermal/catalytic
oxidation; and groundwater extraction, air stripping, activated carbon filtration, bioreactors.
• Conducts investigations of surficial contaminants such as lead, cadmium, chromium, zinc, copper
and pesticides.
• Directs landfill investigations which include cover analysis and risk assessment.
• Performs risk evaluations and feasibility studies involving calculating mobility and potential impact
of subsurface contaminants.
• Evaluates release scenarios using computer modeling and fate and transport simulations.
• Assesses and evaluates potential geologic hazards such as faults, liquefaction, and landslides.
• Provides expert witness and consultation services:
SELECTED MAJOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Water Resources Projects
• Remote Mountain Community. Mr. Stormo evaluated the long-term use and availability of
groundwater for a remote mountain community. Included a review of historic water levels and
recharge rates, and identification of preferred drilling locations based on the geology of the site.
• Proposed Residential Subdivision. Mr. Stormo provided hydrogeologic expertise on a water
availability study for a proposed residential subdivision that will rely on groundwater.
• FDA Spring Certifications. Mr. Stormo has provided hydrogeologic expertise for spring certification
reports on several properties throughout California in preparation for developing these sites as spring
water sources.
• Proposed "Spring" Site. Mr. Stormo performed an in-depth evaluation of a reported spring site to
identify the nature of the "spring." The physical setting, geochemistry, and soil stratigraphy were
evaluated, including the use of geophysical techniques to probe the subsurface. Concluded that the
"spring" was not a natural feature.'
• Watershed Evaluation and Management Projects for Indian Tribe. Mr. Stormo has been the senior
consultant and project manager for the development and implementation of two watershed evaluation
and management programs. These activities have included:, 1) identifying and quantifying
wastewater sources in the watershed; 2) gaging stream flows and water quality in the major drainage
of the watershed; 3) design of surface water sampling programs and development of Quality
Assurance Project Plans; 4) design and installation of monitoring wells to evaluate water quality in
the three water -bearing aquifers; and 5) data evaluation and report preparation.
• Salt Water Intrusion Study. Mr. Stormo managed the installation of five wells to evaluate the
potential for salt water intrusion into the upper aquifer adjacent to the Salton Sea.
Scot A. Stormo
continued
3
Water Source Studies. Mr. Stormo evaluated the chemistry of waters at several sites to identify the
source(s) of surface and groundwaters. The evaluations included comparisons of major and trace
element geochemistries in' on -site and potential off -site water sources. These projects. were
conducted in support of legal proceedings.
Hazardous Materials Projects
• Industrial Park Environmental Assessment. Mr. Stormo was project manager for this assessment
which involved research of current and past uses and practices, collection .and analysis of soil and
groundwater samples, and removal of underground storage tanks. Additionally, the project involved
asbestos assessment and abatement, development of an asbestos management plan, and assessment of
metallic dust residues.
• Former Above -Ground Storage Tank and Pipeline Facility. Mr. Stormo managed the environmental
investigation of this facility. He evaluated whether the facility contributed contaminants to a
regionally extensive groundwater plume emanating from a nearby refinery. This involved
differentiating between gasoline and diesel fuel in soil samples, estimating the extent of weathering
of the hydrocarbons, and evaluating whether BTEX compounds were migrating upward through the
soil as vapors.
• Law Suit Involving Pre -Existing Contamination. Mr. Stormo was project manager, principal
geologist and expert witness in a law suit involving pre-existing contamination on a former service
station property with numerous prior owners, operators and adjacent spills. He evaluated prior
remedial activities for appropriateness; evaluated likelihood of upgradient sources; used computer
modeling,. and fate and transport simulations to evaluate the likelihood of various release scenarios;
and, developed cost estimates for clean-up.
• Groundwater Contamination at Two Landfills. Mr. Stormo was field manager and chief author of an
investigation of the extent of groundwater contamination at two landfills. The project included well
installation, aquifer testing, groundwater modeling, risk assessment, and remedial alternatives
evaluation.
• Phase 1 and II Investigations and Leaking UST's. Mr. Stormo was involved in numerous
investigations related to leaking underground storage tanks and hundreds of environmental site
assessments (Phase I Investigations) of industrial, commercial, residential, agricultural, and vacant
properties, with follow-up (Phase II Investigations) of the sites identified as potentially contaminated.
• Bunker C. Fuel Oil Spill. Mr. Stormo authored the Vacuum Extraction Pilot Test and the Soil
Column Bioventing and Surfactant Flushing Treatability Study pertaining to'this site. He performed
data analyses and provided geochemical consulting services.
• Groundwater Contamination Plume Geochemical Evaluation. Mr. Stormo evaluated the chemistry
of a groundwater contamination plume involving solvents. He used an analysis of the relative
concentrations of the two primary contaminants to identify three separate plumes with distinctive
chemical signatures. He then delineated plume boundaries, mixing zones, and probable source areas.
• Metal Working Facility Airborne Contaminant Investigation. Airborne metallic dusts such as lead,
cadmium, and chromium were the primary concern at this site. As project manager and principal
investigator, Mr. Stormo performed ambient air sampling and surficial dust sampling and .analysis,
and used the isotopic concentrations of the lead and the ratios of the various metals in the different
media, to identify the source of the airborne materials.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
National Ground Water Association
Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers
Association for Environmental Health and Sciences
NOTE:
With proper validati6n
this form constitutes an
encroachment permit
CITY OF,'.LA QUINTA
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (ENCROACHMENT)
For the const'ru.ction*, of public or private curbs, driveways, paveme"nts, sidewalks, parking 'lots, sewers, water mains
and other -like public works improvements in connection with MI . NOR IMPROVEMENTS and APPROVE*
D SUBDIVISIONS
Subdivision Improvement P4mit — Class III
January' 2003-
'DATE:. Minor Improvement Permit Class IV X
LOCATION OFCONSTRUCTIONWell establishmaut for well 5717.-at'Tract 24197,Moriaticello
on the west Aide of Jefferson frot Miles to Fred Wiring Drive.
11 (Street address oe Description of Lo&atio - n)
Construct temporary discharge �,PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION mh Gn�,trgrq!,LcLnplans Lf-,appr,�pr--a",tie,)
vatiai llhe,:for; well establishment
;DESCRIPTION,'(jF.CONSTRUCTION InOtallIng 414010taty. **SEE ATTACHED TWIT CONDITIONS**'
viveiin'e lalond the west shoulder ,of Jef feiaonll.`with
a buried 94CtI.00 Under the Sidewalk and entrance -to. Molaticello'.
DIMENSION OF -INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL
Approxiv*tolt,3090 If of 12" line with t,400
EXCAVATION' I.F.NEEDED as neededfor buried sections
.0see ea %ietchev)
APPROXIMATE TIME -WHEN WORK WILL BEGIN
Approximately February 1*, 2003
APPROXIMATE TIME 0F,COMPLETION 6 month ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ t $101000.00
-including removal;
al" of all'obstruction, materials, and,debris, backf i I I i ng, corn
ra*nen� paction and, placing' permanent resurfacing a.nd/or,replaci'ng,iiilprovements)
In consi6ration '6f.the granting of this perrnit, 'the applicanf hereby' agrees to:
Ind emnify,.defend!,and save.the City, its authorized agents, officers,' representatives and employees,. harmless from and against any and all
penalties, liabilities or •loss resulting from claims or court action. and arising out of any accident, loss or dam*aige to. persons or, property,
Mppqning or occurring as.a . proximate result.of any work undertakeri under the permit granted pursuant to this application.
Notify the AdmiRistrative'Authority at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the time when work will be started..
Comply, with all applicable, City Ordinances, the terms and conditions of, the permit and all applicable rules.and regulations of the City of
La Quinta and tol,pay for any-addiflonal replacement necessary as the result of this work.
Signature of: 'Applicarif or -Agent
C M_ PBran 1058, Coacholla,CA 92236- 760.398.2651 xt,397.
NameofApplicant:(pleAq print) Business Address Telephone No.
Hector Rodriguez, ENGINEER same as .above.
Name of Contractor and Job Foreman Business Address Telephone No...
Coutracter to b6 iliqtermiued; 'State License and City-Busineas'.License'to be' frowarded
Contra ctor's License No. City Business, License No.
alcmg with Insurance Certificates and Policy Numbers..
Applicant's Insu.irance Company Policy Number
FEES: Subdivision Improvement Permit — Class 1.11
Public improvements: 3% of 'estimated construction costs
Private improvements: 3% of -estimated construction costs
Minor. Improvement Permit — Class IV: See attached schedule.
381!
Inspection Fee PERMIT VALIDATION -
Permit Fee
PERMIT NO-.-
Penalty DATE APPROVED _January 1, -2003
Cash Deposit -Surety Bond
if required EXPIRAT16N. DATE January 31, 2004
TOTAL: 0.00-
January 7, 2003
DATE ISSUED
.Receipt No.
-, :Received by Date
Recorded by
By
Victor Mont, Asstsi—arAcIffi. iniisirkative,-A7uthority6L.
Telephone, (760)* 7 717- 7075
e.
City of La Quinta
The following General and Special Provisions are attached to and made a part of
Permit Number 3813
The following shall always apply:
ENCROACHMENT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY: This permit authorizes work to be accomplished within the City of La Quinta's right of way
ONLY. Whenever construction extends within private property, it is the responsibility of the permittee.for his contractors to secure permission
from abutting property owners. Such authorization must be secured by the permittee prior to starting. work:
TRACK -LAYING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT: Cleated track -laying construction equipment shall not be permitted to operate on any paved
surface unless .fitted with smoother -faced street pads. All mechanical outriggers shall be fitted with rubber street shoes to protect the paving
during excavations. Rubber -tired equipment only shall be used in backfill operation in paved areas. If the existing pavement is scarred, spalled,
or broken during the term of this contract or if the pavement is marred, City of La Quinta shall request that these portions of road be resurfaced
over their.entire width. Resurfacing shall consist of one' coat of two inches (2") of A.C. surfacing plus appropriate seal coat as specified above.
PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC: All excavations and work areas shall be properly lighted and barricaded as deemed necessary by the City
Engineer or City of La Quinta Public Works Inspectors. Suitable detours and detour signs shall be placed and maintained for the duration of the
project. The City shall be notified twenty-four hours (24) in advance of any traffic detours or delineation.
CARE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES: Any drainage structure to include corrugated metal pipe, concrete pipe, steel culvert and concrete
structures encountered during excavation which necessitate removal shall be replaced in kind. In the event it becomes necessary to remove or
cut existing drainage structures, City of La Quirita shall be notified prior to commencement of this work. Drainage structures and open drains
shall be kept free of debris at all times for proper drainage.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CLEANUP: Any surplus material resulting from excavation and backfill operations shall be removed from the right of way. All
paved surfaces shall be broomed clean of earth and other objectionable materials immediately after backfill and compaction. Existing gutter line
and drainage ditches shall be replaced to their original standard or better. All excess material shall be removed prior-td.paving. Water tanker
shall be used, as required, to sprinkle the job site to keep down dust conditions and shall be used immediately after backfill.
DE -WATER OPERTATIONS: If de -watering operations ,are required and pumps are forcing water on City of La Quinta roads, it shall be the
responsibility of the permittee (contractor) to control this water and to provide off-street barricades when necessary.
CLOSING STREETS: No street shall be closed. • A minimum of one lane of traffic shall be maintained at all times to provide limited access for
the.adjoining property owners and emergency vehicles. •In the event it is felt by the permittee that he must close a street for any length of time,
permittee shall contact this office to obtain the necessary permission.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The following shall apply when indicated:
® R1 NOTIFICATION: Permittee shall be notified the City at (760) 777 - 7075 at least forty-eight hours (48) in advance of starting .
construction.
®.R2 UTILITY CLEARANCE: (Substructures) Prior to making any excavations within the City of La Quinta right-of-way authorized
by permit,,the permittee shall contact all concerned utility companies relative to the location of existing substructures.
Damage to existing substructures. resulting from operations conducted under this permit shall be the sole responsibility of the
permittee.
® R3 UTILITY CLEARANCE (Surface Structures) No work shall be done under this permit until all utilities are clear of the
proposed work,site. The permittee shall notify all concerned utility companies of the proposed work.
❑ R4 PAVEMENT WIDENING: Area between the proposed concrete gutter line and the existing road pavement shall be surfaced
with (** N/A **) inches of A.C. paving placed on ( ** N/A **) inches of. (. ** N/A **) aggregate sub -base course having an
"R" value of not less than ( "* N/A **) and in conformance with the City of La Quinta Road Improvement Standards and
Specifications, Ordinance #461.
❑ R5 PARKWAY GRADING: Area between the property line and top of the proposed concrete curb shall be graded to a slope of
one-fourth inch (W) to one foot (1').
❑ R6 GRADE CHECKING: City of La Quinta shall check grades upon receipt of plan and profile and/or grades as established bq
a licensed engineer.
❑ R7 CURB REMOVAL FOR DRIVEWAYS: A portion of the existing concrete curb and/or curb'and gutter ("" N/A **) feet shall
be removed. Curb and/or curb and gutter shall be saw cut prior to removal. Depressed curb, matching concrete.gutter and
concrete driveway approach shall be constructed in conformance with City of La Quinta Standard #207.
❑ R8 DRIVEWAYS: A.C. driveways shall be constructed as not to alter existing drainage pattern. Surfacing between the property
line and the existing road paving shall be two and a half inches (2 1/2') of A.C. paving. on ('** N/A **) of class ("" N/A ** )
aggregate base.
® R9 SIGHT CLEARANCE: Sight Clearance of six -hundred feet (600') in all directions shall be assured and maintained at all
times.
❑ R10 SOIL STERILIZER: The area to be surfaced shall be treated with soil strerilizer. Rate of application shall comply with the
manufacturer's specifications.
® R11
�t
® R12 .`
® R13 .
® R14
e .
r ® R15
® R16 '
® R17.
v
' ® R18
Y ® R19
❑ R20
® R21
❑ R22 ,-
® R23
❑ R24 '
E
PERMIT NO. 3813 '
City of La Quinta f
COORDINATE WORK: The proposed work shall be subordinated to any operation; which the State of California or City of
La Quinta may conduct in this area during the period of this permit. Work shall be coordinated with the State or City of La
.Quinta forces to preclude delay or interference with State or City of La Quinta projects.
� Mr
SURVEY MONUMENTS: Prior to excavation or beginning of construction, all survey monuments which exist on the
centerline'of.all streets or property lines when included shall'be completely tied out so they may lie readily and correctly,
replaced by a licensed civil engineer. or surveyor at the expense of the permittee. A complete set of notes showing the ties
to these monuments shall be furnished to the City Engineer.prior to the removal of any monuments. This office shall be
notified upon completion or replacement of all surrey monuments for proper clearance. `
PAVEMENT CUTTING: Pavement will be mechanically saw cut to a straight edge prior to excavation. Method of pavement
cutting shall. be approved through the office of the City Engineer. (Under no circumstances shall excavating e-quipment be
used to excavate prior to cutting or pavement.) Excavation material shall be placed in such a position as to best facilitate the ,
general flow traffic. Prior to final paving operations, any damage to pavement straight edges shall be -corrected.-
LIMIT OF EXCAVATIONS: Excavations sliall be limited to one -thousand • feet- (1000') of open trench before backfill
operations must begin. All excavations shall be properly barricaded with lights overnight, on weekends and holidays for the
protection of the traveling public. The Public Works Inspector shall determine the suitability of excavation barricading in
each case. No excavation shall remain open for a period exceeding five (5) days. No excavation- shall be made unless the
construction material is actually on the work site.
BACKFILL MATERIAL: Backfill shall be free of brush, roots or other organic substance detrimental to its use for purposes
of producing and adequately consolidated backfill. Ant material which the City of La Quinta deems unsuitable (spongy or
saturated material) which is .encountered during excavation shall not be used for backfill, but shall be supplemented or
replaced by an approved•sand or gravel.
BACKFILL SAND: Backfill shall be approved transit -mix sand or equivalent and shall be placed on lifts not greater than
three feet (31 and vibrated using vibrostamper or equivalent equipment. Alternate methods may be substituted,, but in any
case, a relative compaction of ninety-five percent (95%) shall be maintained with the structural section of the roadway. ,
BACKFILL PLACEMENT: Backfill shall be applied in layers of not more than fifty percent (50%) of the total depth of the
trench before flooding or a maximum of five feet (5') lifts where trenches are of excessive depths. Care is to be exercised
• that the backfill material is not subjected to extreme swell by flooding operations. Backfill material shall be placed so that the
resulting compaction shall not be less than ninety percent (90%) or equivalent to the surrounding ground, whichever is the
greater compaction.' Where ponding or flooding is used for a maximum settlement, adequate dikes will be constructed to
retain the water. Where jetting is. used, the jets shall be of sufficient. length to reach the bottom of each layer and the water
supply shall be continuos.
ti COMPACTION -TESTS: If so required;by the inspector, compaction test shall be made at intervals of not more than one-.
thousand (1000') feet and a maximum of one (1) test on'each road. One (1) copy of each test shall be forwarded tot the City
Engineer for approval and filed prior to making permanent repairs. Compaction tests shall be made as outlined in Section
6.3.01 of the Standard Specifications, Division of Highways,'State of California, dated January 1973.
COMPACTION TESTS: If so required by the Inspector,. compaction tests shall be made for each crossing or service line.
One (1) copy of each test shall be forwarded to the City Engineer for approval and filed prior to making permanent repairs.
Compaction tests shall be made as outlined in Sections 6.3.0.01,of the Standard Specifications, Division of Highways, State .
of California, dated January_1973.
TEMPORARY PAVEMENT REPAIRS: After completion of backfill and compaction operations, a•temporary patch consisting
of two inches (2") of SC-800 shall be placed on a prepared sub -grade. The SC-800 temporary paving shall be placed after
a maximum of three -thousand linear. feet (3000') or,trench has been excavated and backfill operations completed, but in no
case shall the placement of the temporary pavement exceed a five (5) day limit.
PERMANENTPAVEMENT REPAIR: After backfill and compaction have been completed, a temporary patch consisting of
two inches (7) of SC-800 shall be placed immediately. A permanent patch of ( 4) inches of A.0 surfacing placed on a ( 6 )
inch ( crushed ) aggregate base shall be placed no later than ( 7 ) days after completion of temporary road repair.
FOG SEAL:`A fog seal coat consisting of an application of asphaltic emulsion shall.be applied over all patch areas as
determined by the City Engineer.
STREET RESTRIPING: Where street striping is still visible on street to be excavated, such striping shall.be replaced upon, -
completion of permanent repairs. -
TREE RELOCATION OR REMOVAL: Tree relocation within the City of La Quinta road right-of-way shall be accomplished
by a licensed, bonded and insured'tree service, and handled safely without interference or hazard to the traveling public. It
shall be the responsibility of the permitte to maintain the tree in a vigorous growing condition at its new location. -
Trees to be removed shall be in sections, which can be handled safely without interference or hazard to highway traffic. The
entire width of the tree stump,'shall be removed and disposed of so that no debris remains in view of the higliway. .The ti .
stump hole shall be backfilled andthoroughly compacted as specified in the following paragraph. Where it becomes -
necessary to restrict traffic, the work shall be restricted to a maximum of five -hundred feet (500') at any one time. Adequate
signs, flagmen and or barricades shall be provided to protect the traveling public at all times.
Large holes res"ulting from -tree removal shall be backfilled and compacted to not less' than ninety percent (90%) or
equivalent tot the surrounding ground, whichever is the greater compaction as determined by the impact or field method.
Compaction tests shall comply with Section 6.3.01 of the•Standard Specifications, Division of Highways, State of California,
dated January 1973..
r
s PERMIT NO..3813 CVWD
u
In addition to the'standard permit conditions; the"following shall apply: `
1.. - Pursuant to Section 14.16.320 of the'La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance, 10. § 1. (part), 1982), all
%work shall be performed,in.accordance with the.latest edition of the Standard.Specifications For Public '
Works Construction (SSPWC) and as directed by" and to the satisfaction -of the City, Engineer.-
2. CVWD, hereinafter referred'to as "Permittee", shall be responsible for providing continuous. dust and
erosioncontrol.
3.' Streets shall be tkept clean. They shall be completely.cleaned at the end of each working day and more
frequently if required: s
4. Pursuant to Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance 18 § 1, 1982); throughout" -
the work site, the Permittee shall' comply with -City regulated work hours. Operation and maintenance,
a of equipment within one-half mile of human. occupancy Shall "be performed only during the following-
't time periods:
"October 1st to April,30: Monday -Friday _ 7:00 a.m: to 5.30 p.m.
• ♦ Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00-p.m. :_",�,•r
x
1 ; May lst-to September 30: Monday -Friday., 6:00 a.m to 7:00 p.m., M.
Saturday ,. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Work shall be prohibited on legal,holidays and Sundays.
5. , Work performed within 500 feet of a signalized intersection is restricted between the Hours of 9 a.m.
- 3 p.m. Traffic control shall be set up after 9 a.m. and'removed before3 p.m. The.Permittee shall
contact'the Riverside Country,Traffic Signal 'Maintenance. Department, at (909) 275-6894,,if signal
operation at the intersection is to be altered in any way. ,
6. Pursuant to ' Section 14.1.6.110 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance 10 § 1; (part), .1982),
Permittee shall assume responsibility for repair of any pavement damage to any public or private street
and for any damage to other City streets or facilities -as a result of work performed under this permit:
7: Pursuant to Section .14.16.250 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance 10' § 1 (part); 1982),,
advance warning signs and traffic control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with Cal ;
Trans Standards or the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH.Manual).. A traffic eontrol
plan shall be prepared in accordance with the WATCH •Manual and submitted to the City for
r review and approval'one.Q) week prior to starting any construction. It shall be the^Permittee's, .
responsibility to appropriately detour and barricade all. construction sites.
Special Conditions -Permit No. 3813Page I of 5
j
Pursuant to Section 14.16.290 of the La Quinta Municipal, Code'(Ordinance 10 § 1 (part); 1982), street
closures shall not be permitted. A.minimum of two (2) travel lane of paved.surface shall be
maintained at all times.
8. Prior to excavating, if required, the Permittee shall contact Underground Service Alert at 1-800-422-
4133. It shall be the Permittee's responsibility to notify the Public Works Department of anticipated
excavation, which impact City facilities, including but not limited to.traffic signal conduits and loops,
irrigation lines, electrical conduits, and storm drain facilities. yffi
9. Should additional work, materials, or modifications of the work be required in order to meet -City
standards, safety requirements, signage requirements, or to fit actual field conditions, the work shall be
performed by the. Permittee as directed by and to..the satisfaction of the City Engineer at no cost to the
City of La Quinta.
10. Pursuant to Section 14.16.370 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance 10 § 1 (part), 1982),
backfill compaction within street rights -of -way shall conform with Section 306-1.3 of the latest'edition
of the Standard Specifications For Public Works Construction (SSPWC), except as otherwise specified
herein.
Native material may used as backfill material provided that minimum compaction, achieved'.in the
manner prescribed herein; is achieved. Backfill shall be performed'by mechanical means; no water.
densified compaction via jetting or flooding or other means shall be allowed. It shall.be the.Permittee's
responsibility to provide appropriate geotechnical supervision, testing, and inspection, onsite, at all
times during backfill operations.' t•
Backfill compaction shall be achieved by the following conditions: -
A. When a firm foundation is not encountered due to soft, spongy or other unsuitable material, such
' material shall be removed to the limits directed by the Geotechnical Inspector and/or the City
t Inspector and the resulting excavation backfilled with pipe bedding material.
B: Backfill materials shall be brought to or maintained at an appropriate moisture content for
compaction.' The appropriate moisture content range shall be established at the onset of the .
project and ensuredprior to use of the materials through progress testing on the stockpiles.
C. The first length of trench backfilled shall be backfilled in the presence of the City Inspector.
Compaction shall be •tested at random depths at approximate three-foot vertical, intervals as
backfill is placed to ensure the effectiveness of the compaction methods and to establish the depth.
- of lift that can be compacted.
Special Conditions - Permit No. 3813 r Page 2 of 5
�. PERMITf NO: 3813 ' .
: CVWD.
• , D. ' If lifts+greater than one footare attempted in this trial length of trench, compaction tests shall°be
taken within -the lifts to. ensure'that the full depth of the lift is compacted. Upon satisfactory,.
completion of this portion of trench, the City Inspector, shall establish the maximum lift thickness
to be compacted for the remainder of the project. <f _
E. In subsequent lengths of trench, the frequency of compaction.tests shall equal one per each lift,
of backfill; per 300.linear,feet.of open trench,,at randomly selected locations withintheopen '
length of trench. l
R Tlie depth of the randomly selected compaction tests shall also be randomly selected except that
` where multiple tests are required in a given length of trench; the tests shall be no closer than.three .
feet (vertically) -froin each other:
G. 'If any compaction test fails, previously placed backfill (in `the same length of open trench or
previous lengths of trench) which is represented by the failing test (as determined by the City
F Inspector); shall be tested for compliance with •compaction requirements. ; • '
,. • ,
H. All costs incurred due to the conditions above shall be borne by the Permittee. Copies ,of all test
results shall -be furnished to -the City Inspector.-.
11. All excavations within City of La Quinta right-of-way shall be backfilled, and temporarily paved if
within the existing travel way, at the end of every'workday as directed by and to the satisfaction of the
- City Engineer` for the protection of the public. Lengths of open trench shall not greatly exceed that
' which can not be backfilled in the same day. Excavated trenches shall not be allowed open overnight,
'however, Permittee may leave'.a length of excavated trench, not to exceed .twenty (20) feet in length;
open overnight at a point where construction will begin the next ;day, provided that this length. of trench ' .f
is completely covered by steel plating.
' 12 All landscaping, irrigation, decorative rock, decorative concrete, lighting, etc. shall ,be replaced to its
original condition.
13. Access and egress to -all local properties shall be maintained at all times. r
14' Pursuant -to Section 14. f 6.375 of the La Quinta-Municipal Code (Ordinance 10 § .1 `(part), 1982),
s permanent pavement replacement shall be'cbmpleted no later. than seven (7),days after the completion
f of -the work. Permanent pavement replacement shall conform to the following_ conditions:
A. Existing asphalt concrete pavement shall be sawcut one (1) foot beyond trench edges. tEdges shall.
be straight and clean..
Special Conditions - Permit No. 3813 /. Page 3 of 5
a
- PERMITNO.381.3 = ;
'CVWD ti
B. Permanent pavement replacement structural section, within all trenches, shall be;1" thicker than
` existing of asphalt concrete over the same existing thickness of crushed aggregate base or crushed
miscellaneous base; meeting the requirements of Sections 200-2.2j and 200-2.4 of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works, Construction. The replaced, pavement and .base material shall
be compacted to 95% relative compaction and .respectively tested, for each 300 linear feet of
- trench. Verify exact structural replacement section thicknesses �with:the City prior to installation. , t
C.- `. Permanent pavement replacement shall be installed using a City approved 3/4" max medium
asphalt concrete'as the base course lift7and'a.City approved t/2" max mediumfinish course lift. for" ,
capping. Asphalt concrete rriix design shall be approved by the City to its placement. `
D. ' Cold -Mill and Overlay - The existing' avement which was properly protected in place during the -
trenching operation located'adjacent to the trench saw cut shall be cold -milled to a depth of 0.10
-feet with buttjoint created next to the existing unmilled pavement. surface. The cold-milled'area
and base asphalt concrete in the trench area shall be overlaid with a City approved C2-AR-4000
asphalt concrete mix. The width of the cold milling area shall be.as follows:'
A.
• For longitudinal trenches located in a parking lane: two (3) feet,outside the sawcut removal
lines. : r
A
For longitudinal trenches located in a traffic lane:,two (3) feet outside the sawcut removal
'lines, or to the -lane line striping, whichever is greater. ;
• • For transverse trenches across'-existing'street: tw6.(2) feet outside'the sawcut removal lines.-
AA
E. If grinding and capping operations are not performed in the same day as base paving operations,
• the base'course lift of 3/4"; max medium asphalt concrete shall.be installed,from saw -cut edge to,
saw -cut edge flush with the existing' -street surface. The base.course lift of paving shall not'be{left
0.10'�low in anticipation of,grinding and'cappir' r . ' .,r •
-i - - r
F. Any existing lane striping or anYy'existin .detour lane striping affected by -this resurfacing shall ,.
' be replaced in kind by the Permittee; as,directed by and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
f Affected traffic signal loops shall be removed and replaced in kind. The finished pavement '
surface shall be smooth, consistent, and shall conform to the surrounding grades. ,
' 15.i ' Perniittee shall permanently stabilize any and all soil that was disturbed as a result of work performed
..,under this permit with an approved dust control treatment. Soil stabilization'shall be done immediately
after. completing the operation. • . �; v
Special Conditions - Permit No. 3813 Page 4 of 5
16. Pursuant to Chapter 12.56. of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Ordinance 10 § 1 (part), 1982) the City
has designated certain city streets as Truck Routes. The weight limit for restricted. streets (i.e., streets
not part of the Truck Route network) is three (3) tons; trucks exceeding the weight limit may use a
restricted street if making a delivery or pickup on the subject street, or if this permit specifically grants -
permission to -use the street to deliver street construction materials and/or equipment.
17. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to revoke, suspend or void this permit at any time.
18. The permittee shall indemnify, hold harmless and assume the defense of the City from all damages,
delay costs; costs or expenses in law or equity that may arise out of work under this permit.
19. This permit allows for the installation of a "temporary" discharge water pipeline to facilitate the.
discharging drilling water during well. establishment of well no. 5717 for Tract No. 24197, Monticello.
The "temporary" line will be buried in two locations; (1) under the meandering sidewalk near Jefferson
and Miles by removing the existing concrete sidewalk; installing a temporary 12" C: 900 line, installing.
a "temporary" asphalt concrete sidewalk until the well is established, then, removing the temporary line
and replacing the concrete section of sidewalk. (2) under the Independence Avenue entrance to
Monticello by sawcrctti g and removing the existing pavement, installing a "temporary'.' 12" C-900 line,
installin `hot- mi ' (permanent asphalt concrete) , removing and replacing traffic control, then, .. 'once
well is a ished, removing the "temporary" line and permanently replacing asphalt concrete
pavement and traffic �ntrol.
God n� i �. c=v2 •T�4,�i�
20. The City of La'Quinta has not reviewed the proposed point -of fin. al discharge of the well establishment
water, as it is on private property, the City reserves its right to "revoke or modify this permit should the
situation warrant further. action..
Peremis N.. 3813
Sl TE
w
BERM UDA
DUNES'`
FRED WARING DR.
MILES AVENUE
INDIO
INDIAN
WELLS a
ni —(A
_
LD r 2
z
N
50TH. AVENUE
-3
AVENUE
z
TYPICAL: DISTRICT TO REMOVE SECTION OF
52
w
CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND INSTALL TEMPORARY
Lo
12 "' C-900 PVC DISCHARGE PIPE FOR
VICINITY
MAP
�xisrwRETENTION
BASIN
TIE—IN. DISTRICT SHALL INSTALL
1WN 0
TEMPORARY PAVEMENT OVER REMOVED SECTION,
NOT TO SCALE
11.90
ONCE WELL 5717 IS ONLINE THE DISTRICT SHALL
REMOVE PIPE AND REPLACE SIDEWALK SECTION.
fxsw s>
r
p�
LLB
n
vV Ll J7-17
MSiMO 12" OIP
OF
Zr�
Ln
�
cwsnNc 24,L av
_
LLB
LL,
LL,
smur Rraar of "wr
__..
LLl
erc nvc swtwN.i
0 20 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
arrsw cow A dD wr/vp
1N/J1I r S AVF'i\]Ur.
SITE PLAN
DISCHARGE PIPE CROSSING AT SIDEWALK
SI TE
W
BERMUDA
DUNES
FRED WARING DR.
Z
MILES AVENUE
INDIO
INDIAN o
Q�
WELLS z
ui
z
3
50TH. AVENUE
2
O
AVENUE
52
W
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 100
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 f t.
200
IND4PEJ� DENCE A V f N U E
1 { EXISTING
52
CONSTRUCTION NOTE;
WATER LINE_._ 0 HAVE A MINIMUM
30" OF COVER AND ALL JOINTS
RESTRAINED.
AN---N406i�#WES�-EA
ldyTE,2 ulva TD $E' qp»v
q/V 0 AAVC- "nf r_ TD aE'
o RETENTIe''es _
BASIN
12 C-900 WATER, LINIF (CLASS 150)
45' BEND & 6't
SO END OF PIPE
SURFACE,
INSTAL
E GE OF
VDIENT
-
W
w
{5
�
6'
I4
3
�w
zZ
X
O
3
•
w
E S NG M.H.
v
�
0s
w
�
�P
SI
P V'�EMEENT
�F
w
45' END & 't OF PIPE
SO E D OF PPE IS ABOVE
SURF CE. INS ALL END CAP
roy",^ q i' ir, x. ,'4'"rye k' arts s,$'#^"�
r2
nu r xu r r U
P L-3 ®60A "K" P 5
`— 3B 1 ®16A "K" IN: O SPANGUY,i
,F
lw 3 5 4w 10-50 2071341 PER
I.I.D. CREWS. P2 17 IN. 4 48 52 53 50 33 — 120 FIBERGLASS INSULATOR O,H. STD.
P P P P S S KVA 221 0 0061 STRAIN GUY
HOOK; -UP NEW TRANSFORMERS
I 120 240v TO SAME PHASE THEY DG IN: 1-7/16" 35 42 43 45 20500021 0 30' 60'2'
WERE PREVIOUSLY. 3B 1 ®15A "K" Hx
1w 1 1 3w 50 207 1251 z - SCALE:"=60'
q)���5 3)P3 IN: 50 33 KVA 122100061
SPG r,N. 3 5/16 36 42 20500071
P P S P S T. R.6Sec.10
120 240V
j
3B 3 2DG IN 2- 7/16" 35 42 43 45 20500071 PROJECT P- 3724 NW# 010787 C.S.�- 1319 SHEET 1 OF 1
1w 1 "x REVISION CHART f� IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT
P4 IN: (D(1Dg- 17 48 202R1421 IMPERIAJ,, CA. (
RPE RM: IID. EQUIP. & TOP OFF POLE 1' ABOVE Y: DESCRIPTION (' _- COACHELLA j-, •TFY 3IVTSION P OTHER AGENCIES ATTACHMENTS. - - - OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION
for =`
III,;, ATER AMEPT F. GARCIA
;RDG RM: DOWN GUY COMPLETE c 71, S CA
LOT ,f�22 ELK, �`�1 �i3010 S'�'�'1`A CAP�i�ITt`� "dAL�; I �
jj
PNER LA QuINTA, uommIA �2253
WIRE L1�YOUT
DESIGN: G. BARD D�� l`A� r -d71
I- I
nn, v y. s (r sit '�J1.T� ;? /z� f! �). ( „w
�t r r