The URL can be used to link to this page

Rancho Santana - Estates TR 31202-40. BOX 1504 APPLICATION ONLY Building 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO Address LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 uwner /`/� j! /�/_` �// ( BUILDING: TYPE CONST OCC. GRP. Mailing —2 r Address </0 "7_1— v /// ��// �/` C A.P. Number �� 1 � V � 2 Cjt Zip Tel. Legal Description & �. _) r 3 17C 6 777- /9%d 0 cress State Lic. & Classif. i3 7 S Arch., Engr., Designer Project Description Tel.2"-- o1>�G.2 �)_i 67�_��,,� J Ov J City Sq. Ft. No. No. Dw. /,p S Lic. # ) V 9,- Size Stories Units Address Tel. City Zip State (� V,- y� (.2 3 Lic. # LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). O I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Profes- sions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or im- provement is sold within one year or completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner or property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company ❑ Copy is filed with the c, . ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE ti (This section need not be co- pleted it the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less). I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT., If,,; after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become New ❑ Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ PL011V /o/ o-5�_-3-23a2&z5-7 FrcEE1T49"Olf,"C7 Q!;'i S61 7 ?L 6ve17'� /ZaP. w1p *A1 � r7 C,, pI Gw Estimated Valuation PERMIT AMOUN Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. Infrastructure TOTAL REMARKS nrl lul [tjv subject to the WorkersCompensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provision¢. or this permit shall be deemed revoked. ZONE: �F �t ,I ," BY: t Minimum Setback Distances: CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY Front Setb crV5—Ce ter Line I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Rear Setback from Rear Prop.Line Lender's Name itSide Street Setback from Center Line Lender's Address This is a building permit when properly d out, signed and validated, and is subject to fille Side Setback from Property Line expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. FINAL DATE INSPECTOR I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter the above -mentioned property for inspection purposes. Issued by: Date Permit Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address Validated by: ' City, State, Zip Validation: WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = FINANCE P.O. Box 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager From: Doug Evans, Planning Director BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT (160) 777-70 12 FAX (760) 777-7011 Building. Plans Approval To CDD: 8-26-2005 Due date: 9-12-2005 Status: I st Review The Community Development Department has reviewed the Building Plans for the following project: Description: The Estates at Rancho Santana SFD x 2 Address or general location: Tract 31202 Applicant Contact: John Pedalino 760-777-9920 The Community Development Department finds that: ❑ ...these Building Plans do not require Community Development Department approval. ...these Building Plans are approved by the Community Development Department. ❑ ...these Building Plans require corrections. Please forward a copy of the attached corrections to the applicant. When the corrections are made please return them to the Community Development Department for review. a Doug Evans, Planning Director S Date YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICES •Engineering •Architecture•Surveying• Building &Safety Services i ` tette.r of -Transmittal To: City of La Quinta. Date: 11/08/05 � Project: Estates@Rancho, Santa Ana 'Attn: - , Ed Randall ' PC#: 05-3729(2"d) Tel No.: (760) 777-7012 Tract No.: i We are forwarding: X By Messenger By Mail Your Pickup No. of Copies Description: ' 2 Redlined Plans - 1 Struct • 3 Revised Plans - Revised Struct > 1 Redlined Truss , Comments: Structural contents are approvable . S_ r • Thank You. ' ` This Material Sent for: k Your Files Per Your Request Your Review X Approval ; Checking At the •request of: Other ` • y a By; N@lin P@chunuri * > Phone # (760) 360-5770 EXT. 104 77-804 Wildcat Drive, Suite C, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 360-5770 ' Bronz Young - t ESI/FME9.)nc STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS - PLAN CHECK REPLY PROJECT: "The Estates at Rancho Santana" DATE 09-29-05 Desert Elite PROJECT NO.: 5166 CLIENT NO. Plan Check by: Jason Appleby FILE NO. Date Checked: 09-12-05 Plan Check No.:05-3729 (1st Check) PAGE NO. 1" OF ' 1 "The Estates at Rancho Santana" Item No.: Reply Structural Corrections 1 Details have been identified at exterior walls. 2 All shear panels, meet the height to width: ratio unless used for structural enhancement only. 3 Connection noted on plans for Girder on sheet 5:3 4 Drawings are correct as shown. There is not a depression for the shower. 5 All headers have been identified on the plans to match the. calculations.. 6 All shear wall. labels match the calculations. .7 Truss drawings and framing" plans have been reviewed for accuracy. 8 �A35 spacing has been reviewed. Calculations have been provided on the red -lined set. 9 All shear transfer details have been identified on sheet 5:3 and 6:3 10 All -drag connection details have been identified on �sheet-5.3-and-6:.3 11. Structural observation is not required unless specifiedtbyathe building department. W o®o CY >� - g� m Z � �� E S I / o Copies Tio: u_ \I Structu t (3) Len Wo,WI By: ,��a '+Q P.O._Box 16606 0 y 6 : Irvine, CA 92623 LU 1i66 (949) 559-4305 * Attn: Len Nobel CAS . Ramon R. Wong, 1 1 , S. E. 2345 . 200 QC 45. Prepared By:"Amy Perez 1800 E. 16th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 .(714) 835-2800 • . Fax (714):835-2819 • LIE, 5..+ E '""GY REP N,'�5r, ORT TERRY ENGINEERING. LLw 5 Lu w t C�Q�� m <Y. g (1) ®; - u- 0-0 *� 0 z Q- u oao LL l 13691 RED HILL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CA 92780. • PHONE114'838-1124 FAX 714 838-1406 - web ' www.terryengineering.com • 'e-mail info@terryengineering.com - � r w LA QUIlM JOB NU42M 050409 BUILDING SUMMARY 2. - GLAZING SUMMARY ' . 3. CF.3R, - Crr4'LIANrE SIATEMENf t 4. HVAC - HVAC SIZIIWJ CALCU ATICN f r B U I L D I.N G S U M M A R Y THE ESTATES PLAN 5, RANCHO SANTANA. JOB NU43ER 050409 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 .. , NEW ATTIC CEILING R30• DUCT INSULATION R4.2. PER31-= INSULATION NOW GLASS FILE NU4IDER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TIC VALVE *PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS 024KG RATICN: t PROVIDE DOLME PANE CERTIFIED LOW E GLASS PER CF-IR FORM THROLK203T EQUIPlv!ENT SIZING. REQUIREMENTS: NE<•L =FMENr TO BE sELE) .•n BY THE awrRACIDR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREM NIS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MIND4M BUILD= HEATING LOAD OF 58391 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE ARE = 80.00E AIR dGNIDITIONER. SEER - 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.52 . WATER HEATER BLANKET = R-12 3. WATER BEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE sgm. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY ENGI14EER NG IS NOT RESFCNSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SE=C)N; TWREEORE, THE FINAL SELi•OCTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE ozm:' REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CAL LUATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE CNLY. EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE NDDhT % BTU/HR FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH DQUIRQNT WY MAKE MMEL 7O S AIR 02MITIONER. 1. (1) BRYANT 539GO48 4.0 AIR CONDITIONER 2 (1) BRYANT 539GO42 3.5 E=wENT QTY MAKE hDDEI CALl.CNS SLAW T s EATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN G62-75775-4NV.51 75.00 R-12 RESULTS: 0214AANK£ IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS MEIFDD. GLASS, SUMMARY THE ESIA M PLAN 5, RANCHO SANTAAA JOB NUMBER 050409 NLN ORIENTATION WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE 1 FRCNT 1.50 1.50 REGULAR VINYL FIXED ttpL 2 FRONT 1.50 1.50 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL' 3 RIGHT 3.00 5.50 - RDG IAR VINYL SSDER DLML 4 RIGHT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DAL 5 FRONT 1.50 5.00 REaffAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 6 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL" SLIDER DWI, 7 FRONT 2.00 7.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL. 8 RIGHT' 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DAL 9 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RE]GUIM VINYL; SLIDER DUAL 10 RIGHT 2.60 4.00 GLASS BI= VINYL FIXED DIAL 11 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DAL 12 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 RE3UTAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 13 RIGHT 2.00• 2.00 REGLMAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 14 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 15 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 16 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 17 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 18 LEFT 3.00- 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED DUAL 19 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DAIL 20 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 21 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIM DAL \• 22 REAR 6.00 A 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL . 23 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DAL 24 REAR 6.00 - 5.00 . REGULAR VINYL FIXED DAL 25 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 REAR 6.•00 L 1.50 REOL AR VINYL SLIDER DAL 27 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 28 REAR 6:00 1.50 RD3UTAR " VINYL SLIDER DAL 29 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 30 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 31 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL " 32 LEFT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 33 LEFT 3.00 5.50. RDGIIAR VINYL SLIM DIAL 34 LEFT 4.00 1.50 , REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 35 LEFT 3.00 5.50 RB3RAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 36 LEFT 3.00 5.50 RE;UTAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 'ERTIFICATE-OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF=1R Page 1 Project Title..,........ THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:58 Iroject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H.'Terry ******* Building Permit #. Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check /:Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124. Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 -------------------- _'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. -------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN-5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = MICROPAS7 ------------------ ENERGY USE SUMMARY = = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 1.98 --- 2.70 -0.72 = = Space -Cooling.......... 64.25. 59.88 4.37 = = Water Heating.......... 7.27 5.92 1.35 = = North Total '73.50 68.50 5.00 _ = Space Heating.......... 1.98 3.10 -1.12 = = Space Cooling.......... 64.25 58.33 5.92 = = Water Heating.......... 7.27 5.92 1.35 = = East Total 73.50 67.35 6.15 = = Space Heating.......... 1.98 3.59 = Space Cooling.......... 64.25 57.82 6.43 _ = Water Heating... ..... 7.27 5.92 = South Total 73.50 67.33 6.17 = = Space Heating.......... 1.98 3.00 -1.02 = _ Space Cooling.......... 64.25 56.36 7.89 = = Water Heating.......... 7.27 5.92 1.35 - = West Total 73.50 ..65.28 8.22 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** _ 1 I "ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 r)roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:58 -------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -,FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE -ESTATES PLAN 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area...... 3533 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type ................. NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal = N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type......:.... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 35330 cf Slab -On -Grade Area......... 3533 sf Glazing Percentage......... 16.9 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F, Average.Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor #'of I Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf.) (cf) Units itioned Type ------- (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence., 3533 35330 1.00 Yes SetBack ----- ------- ---------- 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- --------------- Sheath- Solar'Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf) or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 3533 0.032 30 0 n/a 0 --- Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 403 0.102 13 0 '180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 612 0.102 13 0 270- -90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 182 0.102 13 0 0. 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 656 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 6 Wall.. Wood 603 0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W 7 Door Other . 24 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door IERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page .)roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/.05 13:16:58 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R . User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface ------------ (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 8 SlabEdge ------ 249 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------= IV.26 Al -------------------- Covered 9 S1abEdge 61 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade )rientation ----------------- (sf) ----- factor SHGC ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 2.3 0.360 ----- 0.370 --- 0 ---- 90 -------- Standard --------------=---- GLF1/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Wind Front (N) 2.3 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Right (W) 16.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Wind Right (W) 16.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF5/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt6/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF7/Vinyl/Fixed 8 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Slider .0 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt10/None/Fixed 11,Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRtll/Vinyl/Fixed '.2 Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt12/Vinyl/Fixed .3 Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370-270 90 Standard GLRt13/Vinyl/Fixed .L4 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340.270 90 Standard GLRt14/Vinyl/Slider 15 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt15/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Fixed, 18 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL18/Wood/Hinged 9 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard.GLR19/Vinyl/Slider 0-Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360, 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR20/Vinyl/Fixed 21 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Slider 12 Wind Back (S). 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR22/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Slider -4 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Fixed 25 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt25/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR26/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Back (8) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR27/Vinyl/Fixed 28 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR28/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR29/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard,GLL30/Vinyl/Slider it Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL31/Vinyl/Slider 12 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL32/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL33/Vinyl/Slider ,7ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL -COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 rroject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05`13:16:58 ------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program=FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION SURFACES -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Exterior .Area U- Act Shade. _1rientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 4 Wind Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 ------------------------ Standard GLL34/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL35/Vinyl/Slider 36 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340. 90 90 Standard GLL36/Vinyl/Slider OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 1 Window 2.3 1.5 1.5 1 2 --- n/a --- a n/--- 2 Window 2.3 11.5- 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 5 Window 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a, n/a 6 Window 25.0 5 5 9..67 2 n/a n/a 7 Window 14.0 2 7 8 1 n/a n/a 8 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a. n/a 9 Window 25.0 5 5. 1• 2 n/a n/a 10 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a 11 Window 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a 12 Window 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a 13 Window 4.0 -2 2 1 2. n/a n/a 15 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 17 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a 18 Door 24.0 3 8 22.6 1 n/a n/a 20 Window 30.0 6 .5, 12 .5 n/a n/a 22 Window 30.0 6 5 12 .5 n/a n/a 24 Window 30.0 6 5- 12 .5 n/a n/a 25 Door 48.0 6 8 22.6 1' n/a n/a 27 Window .30.0 6 5 1 2, n/a n/a 29 Window. 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 31 Window 25.0 5. 5 1 2 n/a n/a' 32 Window " 16.5 3 5.5 1 2.4 n/a n/a 33 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 34,_Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 35 Window 16.5 3 5•.5 1 2 n/a n/a 36 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .Project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5' Date..07./07/05 13:16:58 ------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504091,0 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 'User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 --------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 3533 HVAC SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV ' Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a ------ n/a -------- n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC.SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling .Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/-hr) . (Btu/.hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Furnace 58391 n/a n/a n/a ACSplit n/a 51248 63599 n/a Orientation of Maximum..... Front Facing 0 deg (N) _Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range............ . 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type ------------- Location ----=------ R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace Attic -------------- R-4.2 Yes -------- No --------- No ACSplit Attic R=4.2 . Yes No No r!ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 �Iroject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:1.6:58 ------------------------------------- -MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 I -------------------------------------------------------=------------------- WATER HEATING SYSTEMS --------------------- Number Heater in _'ank Type Type Distribution Type System ---------------- -------- ------------------- ------ 1 Large Gas Standard 1 Tank External Energy Size Insulation - Factor (gal) R-value -------- ------ n/a 75 ---------- R-12 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS DETAIL Standby Internal Tank Recovery Rated Loss Insulation Pilot System Efficiency Input Fraction R-value Light ------------ ------------ ------------ ------- ------------------------ 1 Large .76 n/a .026 R-n/a n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, ***" *** installed to.manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. ,his building incorporates HERS -verified Duct Leakage. his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front acing North. his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. -l-his building incorporates a non-standard Water Heating System. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ------------------------- 7 Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R.'installation certificate. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a __)oling system is not installed, then HERS verif.ication,is not necessary. ' A ^.ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:.RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R. Page 7 ------------------------- rIroject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:58 --------------------- ------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090•'Wth-CTZ15S0S Program=FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering,,Run-THE ESTATES PLAN 5 HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ------------------- This,building incorporates HERS verified EER. -'his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage..'arget leakage is calculated and.documented on the CF-4R-.,If the measured CFM,.is above the arget,'then corrective action must be taken to.reduce the duct leakage and hen must be retested..Alternatively,'the compliance calculations could'be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed',. then HERS erification is not necessary.. REMARKS eak Sensible Cooling Load: 51.5 MBH Peak -Sensible Heating Load: 58.5 MBH � J ' f ^ERTIFICATE OF•COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page-8 ----------------------- .)roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date...07/07/05 13:16:58 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 :Wth-CTZ15S05 -Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the .California,Code 'of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been 'signed by the individual with. overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or_OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HIGHWAY 111 SUITE G Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave. LA QUINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... { 0) 777-9920 Phone... (714)•838-1124 License. Signed.. Signed.. (date) ( 'a e) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title Agency Phone... Signed.. (date) , ' k • t 1. iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ------------------------- Project Title ........... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:58 Iroject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA ******* -------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone.......... 15 --------------------- .ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 fbr-2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc.' ------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User-Terry.Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 -----------------------------------------------------------------=------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area........... .... Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude..... ............... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design.:.... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used....... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 3533 sf. 35330 cf Front Facing 0 deg (N) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F Ill F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY --------------------------------- Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) ------------------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction.and Solar...... Glazing Conduction and Solar..... Infiltration ..................... Internal Gain .................... Ducts............................ Sensible Load .................... Latent Load.... ........ Minimum Total Load 26010 15936 9979 15378 13303 7691 n/a 3440 9100 8803 58391 51248 n/a 0 58391 51248 Note: The loads shown are only one of the -criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor- design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors -when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all HVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 ------------------------------------------- .1roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:.58 -------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering- Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area... .............. 3533 sf Volume ............... 35330 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location. LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design....... 26 F' Winter Inside Design.....:. 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) _.(Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 26010 ----------- 15437 Glazing Conduction and Solar.:... 9979 13925 Infiltration.......... .:........ 13303 7691 Internal Gain .................... n/a 3440 Ducts.......... ........ ....... 9100 8398 Sensible Load.. .............. . 58391 48891 Latent Load ...................... n/a. 0 Minimum Total Load 58391 48891 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC.designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. '-IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 rIroject-Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date .07/07/05 13:16:58 ---------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location...:.. ..... Latitude ........... ......... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design..:.... Summer Outside Design....... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range..............: Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 3533 sf 35330 cf. . Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 26010 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9979 Infiltration ..................... 13303 Internal Gain.... .............. n/a Ducts . .............. .......... 9100 Sensible Load .................... 58391 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 58391 180 deg (S) Cooling ('Btu/hr) 15905 15245 7691 3440 8769 51050 0 51050 Note: The loads -shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors.such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered.. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all "VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 rroject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5 Date..07/07/05 13:16:58 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504090 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5 GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 3533 sf Volume.............. ..... 35330 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing,Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude .... ............ 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range. .............. 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 26010 ----------- 15424 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9979 15304 Infiltration. .... .:.......... 13303 7691 Internal Gain .................... n/a 3440 Ducts..... ................... 9100 8681 Sensible Load. ... .... .... 58391' 50540 Latent Load :...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load -----------° 58391 ----------- 50540 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow, requirements., outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR TFIE ESTATES PLAN 5X/SY. - RAND SANLM LA QUINM JOB NCNBER 050410 " 1. - BUILDRU S[ng" 2. - QAZIM SU49M 3. CF-1R - QMPL.IANCE SDuEjv IT 4. MC ' HVAC SIZDX; CUaXATI0N ti r - T l BUILDING SUMMARY THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y, RANCID SANDM JOB NUMBER 050410 ' _ 4 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILIN; R30 y. DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PE RIMEI R INSULATION NONE - - GLASS FILE NUMBER 10 PROVIDE -LEAK TEST PROVIDE 'IX VALVE - 'PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONFIGURATION: ` PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED IOW E GLASS PER CF-1R FORM THRCAJC3A=L EQUIRIIESNT SIZING REQUIREMENLS: NEW EQU PMwr 10 BE SELECTED BY THE CXNLRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLdOWIM REQ IIRIIgNLS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING HEATHS LOAD OF 61903 ETUL. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL CR GREATER THAN THE FLOLLOWIM: FURNACE ARE = 80.0016 AIR ODMI77CJNER SEER - 13.00 WATER BEAM EF = 0.52 WATER HEATER BLANKET = R-12 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EC® THE SIZE SHOWN. < SAMPLE EQLIIPMW SELECTICNS: TERRY ENGINEERIIN3. IS NTT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELECTION; THEREFORE; THE FTbAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED SY THE'O&M: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FO2 LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE FOLLOWIM SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE OILY. EQUILMENT QW MAKE MODEL Eau/HR ' FLORA m 1 (2) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACIi EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE ' MODEL TOW AIR (33MITIO]ER 1 (2) BROW 539GO48 4.0 v EQUIPME!C MY MAKE MODEL. GALLONS BLANKET E [ WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN G62-75775-4NV.51 75.00 R-12 r RESULTS. OWLIANE IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS MMM. GLASS SUMMARY THE ESTATES PLAN SX/5Y, RANCHO SANIMA, JOB NUMBER 050410 FRAMING OPENIM GLAZING SHADING NUM ORIENTATION WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRCNr 1.50 1.50 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL, 2 FRWT 1.50 1.50 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 3 RIGHT 3.00 5.50, REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 4 RIGHT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER D(AL 5 FRONT 1.50 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED LGAL 6 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR AAR VINYL, SLIDER LGAL, 7 FRONT- 2.00 7.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL, 8 RIGHT 2.00 4.60 R23ILAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 9 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 10 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 GLASS BLOCK NONE FIXED DIAL, 11 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 12 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 13 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR, VINYL FIXED DUAL 14 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DEW, 15 RIGHT' 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL. FIXED DUAL 16 REAR 8.00 1.5,0 REGULAR VINYL SLIMD[AL 17 REAR 8.00 5.00 - REGULAR VINYL _ FIXED DUAL, 18 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HIN3ED DUAL 19 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER LAAL 20 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 21 REAR 6:00 1.50 REGULAR v/1L.LyL, SLIDER DIAL 22 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 23 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 24 REAR - 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 25 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 26 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLICER DAL 27 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR _ VINYL FIXED DIAL 26 REAR 6.00 1.50 REULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 29 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIB DIAL 30 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER LYAL, 31 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 32 LEFT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLICER DIAL 33 LEFT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, 34 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 35 LEFT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 36 LEFT 3.00 5.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL ' 37 LEFT 1.50 1.50 REGULAR VINYL - FIXED DUAL 38 FRONT 3.00' 4.50 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 39 FRONT 3.50 1.25 REGULAR VINYL, FIXED LGAL 40 FRONT 3.00 4.50 REGULAR . VINYL SLID MAT. d 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 ------------------------------------- Project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 roject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA *******------- _______________ LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 __-___-__-_ _-___-_ _'ompliance Method...... MICROPA87.v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 1.91 2.51 -0.60 = = Space Cooling........... 64.17 60.'07 4.10 _ = Water Heating.......... 6.69 5.45 1.24 _ = North Total 72.77 68.03 4.74 = = Space Heating.......... 1.91 2.82 -0:91 = = Space Cooling.......... 64.17 58.13 6.04 = = Water Heating.......... 6.69 5.45 1.24 = = East Total 72.77 66.40 6.37 = = Space Heating.......... . 1.91 2.98 -1.07 = Space Cooling........ 64.17 58.48 5.69 = = Water Heating.......... 6.69 5.45 1.24 = _ South Total 72.77 66.91 5.86 = = Space Heating........, 1.91 2.52 -0.61 = _ Space Cooling........... :64.17 57.51 6.66 = = Water.Heating.......... 6.69 5.45 1.24 = _ West Total 72.77 65.48 7.29 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ ***.HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** ^ERTIFICATE.OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 ---------------- ----------------------------------------------- r1roject Title ............ THE ESTATES PLAN SX/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 -------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES, PLAN 5X/5Y, GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 3840 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal _ N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units...' 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type:.......:. FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 38400 cf, Slab -On -Grade Area......... 3840 sf Glazing Percentage......... 17.8 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC........ 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type ------------- (sf) ----- (cf) ------- Units ----- itioned ------- Type ----------- (ft) (sf) HousewraP Residence 3840 38400 1.00 Yes SetBack ------------ 2.0 Standard ---------- No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area .fact- Cavity ing, Act Gains IV Location/ irface Type - (sf) ---- or ----- R-val ----- R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments '1 RoofRad Wood 3840 0.032 30 ----- 0 --- ---- --- n/a 0 Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood , 403 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 687 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 379 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 693 0.102- 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall Wall Wood 213 0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W Door Other 24 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door "ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 Llroject Title........... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26.:03 -------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM 'CF-1R _-------User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 8'S1abEdge 289 9 S1abEdge 21 irientation 0.730 R-0 No IV.26 Al Covered 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 2.3 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF1/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Wind Front (N) 2.3 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Right (W) 16.5 0.400 0.340 270' 90 Standard GLRt3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Wind Right (W) 16.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard.GLF5/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard.GLRt6/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF7/Vinyl/Fixed 8 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt10/None/Fixed 11 Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRtll/Vinyl/Fixed -2 Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRtl2/Vinyl/Fixed, 3 Wind Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt13/Vinyl/Fixed 14 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt14/Vinyl/Slider 15 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt15/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Slider _7 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.376 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Fixed 18 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL18/Wood/Hinged 9 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR20/Vinyl/Fixed 21 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Slider '12 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR22/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Slider ,,4 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Fixed 25 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt25/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard-GLR26/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR27/Vinyl/Fixed 28 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 18,0 90 Standard GLR28/Vinyl/Slider -9 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR29/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Left (E) -25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL30%Vinyl/Slider j1 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL31/Vinyl/Slider 12 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL32/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL33/Vinyl/Slider CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 �Iroject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 --------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05. Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y --------------- .------------------------------------------------------------ --- FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade _)rientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments, ------------------ ----- ----- ----- --- ------------ ------------------------ 4 Wind Left (E)• 6.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL34/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL35/Vinyl/Slider 36 Wind Left (E) 16.5 0.400 0.340 9..0 90 Standard GLL36/Vinyl/Slider -7 Wind Left (E) 2.3 0.3.60 0.370 90 90 Standard GLL37/Vinyl/Fixed 8 Wind Front (N) 13.5 0.400.0.340 0 90' Standard GLF38/Vinyl/Slider .39 Wind Front (N) 4.4 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF39/Vinyl/Fixed 40 Wind Front (N) 13.5 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF40/Vinyl/Slider 1 Wind Front (N) 4.4 0.360 0.370' 0 90 Standard GLF41/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt42/Wood/Hinged OVERHANGS ---Window -- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width.Height Depth Height Extension Extension ----------- ----- ----- ------ --.--- ------------------------ 1 Window 2.3 1.5 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 2 Window 2.3 1.5 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 16A 3 5.5 1 2 n/a. n/a 5 Window 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 6 Window 25.0 5 5 9.67 2 n/a n/a 7 Window 14.0 2 7 8 1 n/a n/a 8 Window 8.0 2, 4 1 2 n/a n/a 9 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a_ i0 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a 11 Window 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a 12 Window. 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a 13 Window 4.0 2 2' 1 2 n/a n/a 15 Window. 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 17 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a 18 Door 24.0 3 8 22.6 1 n/a n/a 20 Window 30.0 6 5 12 .5 n/a n/a 22 Window 30.0 6. 5 12- .5 n/a n/a 24-Window 30.0 6 5 12 .5 n/a n/a 25 Door 48.0 6 8 22.6 1 n/a n/a 27 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 29 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 31 Window 25.0 5 5. 1 2 n/a n/a 32 Window 16.5 .3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 33 Window 16.5 3 5.5 .1 2 n/a n/a. 34 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a. ^ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:'RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD. CF-1R Page 5 ?roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y _ Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 ------------------------------ MICROPAS7'v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERHANGS ---Window--- -------------- Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 35 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 36 Window 16.5 3 5.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3.7 Window 2.3 V 1.5 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 42 Door 4,8.0 6 8 1 .2 n/a n/a SLAB.SURFACES. ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 3840 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity ------ ------ ------- Furnace 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No. No No System Type Furnace ACSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 61903 n/a HVAC SIZING Sensible Cooling .Load (Btu/hr) n/a 54566 Orientation of Maximum..... Sizing Location. .......... Winter -Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer -Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Design Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a 67717 Front Facing LA QUINTA 26 F TO F. 111 F 75 F 34 F Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a 180 deg (S) 7ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 ------------------------------- t)roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..,07/07/05 13:26:03 ---------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S05,04100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering' Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type ------------- Location ----------- R-value Leakage ''Area Ducts Furnace Attic -------------- R-4.2 Yes -------- No --------- No ACSplit Attic R-4.2 Yes No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size -Insulation 'ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value --------------------------------------------- -------- ---------------- 1 Large Gas Standard 1 n/a . 75 R-12 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS DETAIL ---------------------------- Standby Internal Tank Recovery, Rated Loss Insulation Pilot System Efficiency Input Fraction R-value Light ------------ ------------ ------------ --- ---------------------------- 1 Large .76 n/a .026. R-n/a ri/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans,, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** -his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test or a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve .(TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. This is a multiple orientation building.. This printout is for the front acing North. This building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. his.building incorporates a non-standard Wat"er.Heating.System. f -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 --------------------------------- r'roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 ----------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00" File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R.installation certificate. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test )r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a tooling system is not installed, then HERS verification isanot necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified'EER. _'his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is calculated and documented on.the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the :arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and .hen must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS --erification is not necessary. REMARKS leak Sensible Cooling Load: 55 MBH Peak Sensible Heating Load: 62 MBH 11 11 r CERTIFICATE OF.COMPLIANCE:-RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 8 ---------------- droject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date.-.07/07/.05 13:26:03 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES.PLAN 5X/5Y --------------- -----7----------------------------- ----------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance•lists the building features and performance specifications' needed to comply with-Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code -of Regulations, and the -administrative' regulations to implement them.' This certificate has been signed by,the individual with overall, design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION.AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H.-Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company., Terry Engineering Addres.s..78401 HIGHWAY 111 SUITE G Address. 13691.Red Hill Ave. LA QUINTA CA 92253 Tustin,.'CA ' 92780 Phone... (7 ) 7 7-9920 Phone... (714) 838-1124 .License. Signed.. 0 -Z3 d �� Signed.. S (date) (d te) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY - Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone..: Signed.. (date) 4 IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ---------------- --------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 ?roject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA, ******* ----________•___-____- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ---------------------- _'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. --------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S0.5 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP02.06 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume.. ................. Front Orientation..... ... Sizing Location...... .. Latitude ...:................ Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer'Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range... ....... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 3840 sf 38400 cf Front Facing 0 deg(N) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees' 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description ----------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 26387 --------- 15023 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11410 17590 Infiltration.. .................... 14459 8360 Internal Gain..... ............. n/a 3900 Ducts ............................ 9647 9306 Sensible Load .................... 6.1903 54180 Latent Load....... ..:.......... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 61903 54180 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing,, availability, of equipment, oversizing safety margin, -etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility` to consider all. factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. 'IVAC SIZING HVAC* Page 2 ---------------------------------------- project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:28:03 ---------------- ------------- ------------------------ -- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL,INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area............... Volume ............:........ Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude ...............:... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used....... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 3840 sf 3840.0 cf Front Facing 90 deg (E) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 7.5' F 34 F Yes . Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) .Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ------------ 26387 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11410 Infiltration.... ............... 14459 Internal Gain ...................... n/a Ducts... ....................... 9647 Sensible Load........... ....... 61903 Latent Load............. ....... n/a Minimum Total Load 61903 Cooling (Btu/hr) 14622 1,6315 8360 3900 8958 52155 0 52155 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures., availability of equipment,'oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air. flow coil sizing, must also be consider all 'IVAC SIZING HVAC Page-3 ----------------------------------------------- t'roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN,.5X/5Y' Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S05-04100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area........:.. .... 3840 sf Volume ............. ... ..38400 cf Front Orientation........ Front Facing 180 deg Sizing Location....... ... LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design....... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F' Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY • Heating - Description (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....... ----- 26387 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11410. Infiltration ..................... 14459 Internal Gain........:........... n/a Ducts.... ...................... Sensible Load 9647 .................... 61903 Latent Load:.. ................ , n/a Minimum Total Load 61903 Cooling (Btu/hr) 15052' 17882 8360 3900 9373 54566 0 54566 (S) Note: The loads shown are.only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. 'ZVAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 -------------------------------------- r'roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y Date..07/07/05 13:26:03 MICROPAS7 v7:00 File-S0504100 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 5X/5Y GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area. ...... ..... 3840 sf Volume ..................... 38400 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside.Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range... ............ 34,F. Interior Shading Used......,Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used.....: Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0' HEATING AND COOLING ----------------------------- LOAD SUMMARY. Heating Cooling .Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 26387 ----- 14620 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11410. 17359 "Infiltration.... ............. 14459 8360 Internal Gain........ .......... n/a 3900 . Ducts.... ............... ...... 9647 9175 Sensible Load...... ............ 61903 53414 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 61903 53414 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of` HVAC equipment. Other relevant :design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety.margin, etc., must also be considered. It' is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. .� ,. �� - � � t .. 4 B U.I L D I N G SUMMARY • THE ESTATES PLAN 6,.RANCED SANTANA i JOB NUMBER 050411 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERIN= INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALVE - PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONFIGURA CN: n PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E GLASS PER CF-1R FORM TFOW-3H)UT EQUIPMENT SIZIN3 REQUIREMENTS: 4 NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONTTRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMLM BUILDING BEATING LOAD OF 66693 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL. OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE AFUE = 80.00% AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.52 WATER HEATER BLANKET = R-12 ~ 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. a SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: J , TERRY ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELEC 7CN: '111EREFORE, THE FINAL SECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FOAMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CA103LATIONIS. THE FOLLOWING SELE)L ICNS ARE FOR REFERENM ONLY. DQUIP+4NT QTY MAID; MODEL BTU/HR r i NiIRNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 3110AV036110 89000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH EQUIPMENT QLY MAKE NDDEG TONS F ' AIR QONDTTIONER 1 (1) BR)OM 539G060 5.0- AIR CONDITIONER 2 (1) BRYANT 539G048 4.0 EQUIPMENT QTY' MARE .. NDDEI GALLONS 'BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN G62-75775-4NV.51 75.00 R-12 RESULTS: ) r CCMPamm IS BASED ON, THE WORST CASE PouaoADXE ANALYSIS METHOD. M r. G L ASS SUMMARY z THE FSTAIFS PLAN 6, RANCH S_ANMA JOB NI14M 050411 ' FRAMING OPENING GUAZIIQ SHADIN3 NCM ORIFIITATIC81 WILTIIi HEIGFII wn=w TYPE MATERIAL i TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRONT 5.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 2 FRONT .5.00 2.00 1 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL • 3 FRCF r ' 4 5.00 5. 00 REGULAR VINYL SLMER M 4 FRONT 5.00 -5.00 REGULAR VINYL` SLIDER DUAL 5 FROM' 5.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL . 6 FRONT ".. 5.00 - 2.00. REGULAR .- .. VINYL FIXED DUAL 7 FRONT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 8 FRONT 5.00 5. 00 R 1OU AR VINYL, SLIDER DIAL 9 RIGHT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 10 RIGHT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER MAL 11 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 • REGULAR VINYL, sLmER DUAL 12 RIGHT 2 `00 5.00 R83U AR , VINYL SLIDER DUAL 1 13 RIGHT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, SI DER DUAL 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIIXER DUAL 15 REAR_ 2.50 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED, DIAL` ' 16 REAR . 10.00 . 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER ' DIAL 17 REAR 10.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, g,IEER DUAL 18 RIGHT REAR 6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD FD•) DIAL 19 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 20 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 21 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 22 LET 6.00 8.00 SLIDING CLASS DOOR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 23 REAR 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR '. VINYL, SLIDER DIAL 24 REAR, 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOC R VINYL SLIDER DUAL .' 25 RIGHT 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 RIGHT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL _ 27 REAR 5.60 1.50 REGULAR - VINYL SLIDER DUAL 28 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL, 29 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR Vim, " SLIDER DUAL. 30 REAR 5.00 5.00' REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 31 LEFT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR Vim;• SLIDER DUAL 32 LEFT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLICER D[AL: 33 LEFT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 34 LEFT 2.00 4.00 GLASS BLOCK NON FIXED DUAL r 1 i :ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 Project Title......:... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 )roject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA *******_____________________ LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. _ Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA .92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone...... ... 15 ___-_____-_ -ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00, for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R ---__-_-User#_MP0206 -User-Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 -- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY _ Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = _ Space Heating..... .... 1.93 3.00 -1.07 = = Space Cooling.......... 62.92 55.00 7.92 _ _ Water Heating.......... 6.26 5.10 1.16 = = North Total 71.11 63.10 8.01 = = Space Heating.......... 1.93 3.22 -1.29 _ = Space Cooling.......... 62.92 58.46 = = Water Heating....... 6.26 5.10 14.46 1.16 = = East Total 71.11 66.78 4.33 = _ Space Heating.......... 1.93 3.13 -1.20 = = Space Cooling.......... 62.92 55.25 - 7.67 = = Water Heating.......... 6.26 5.10 1.16 = = South Total 71.11* 63.48. 7.63 = = Space Heating......... 1.93 3-.05' -1.12 - = Space Cooling.......... 62.92 58.'31 4.61 = = Water Heating.......... 6.26 5.10 1.16 = = West Total .71.11 66.46 4.65 = _ *** Building complies with.Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** _ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page-2 Project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 'Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 ---------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry, Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ---------- GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 4101 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Fuel Type ................. NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type........:. FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume.......... 4i010 cf Slab -On -Grade Area......... 4101 sf Glazing Percentage......... 16.9 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... .0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat- Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf) ----- (cf) ------- Units ----- itioned ------------------ Type (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 4101 .41010 1.00 Yes SetBack ----- ------- ---------- 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- --------------- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf). or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 4101.0.032 30 ----- 0 --- n/a ---- 0 --- Yes -------- IV.1 A7 --------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 627 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 22 0.102 13 0 225 90 Yes IV.9. A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 449 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 586 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 616 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9-A3 New Ext Wall 7 Wall Wood 330 0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W 8 Door Other 48 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:,RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 2roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 ------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-FORM'CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering 'Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ----------------------------------- .-------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 9 S1abEdge 303 0.730 R-0 No IV.26 Al Covered 10 SlabEdge 33 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES ---------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade irientat.ion (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments ----------------- 1 Wind Front (N) 2 Wind Front (N) 3 Wind Front (N) 4 Wind Front (N) 5 Wind Front (N) 6 Wind Front (N) 7 Wind Front (N) 8 Wind Front (N) 9 Wind Right (W) 0 Wind Right (W) 11 Wind Right (W) 2 Wind Right (W) 3 Wind Right (W) 14 Wind Back '(S) 15 Door Back ( S ) 6 Wind Back (S) _7 Wind Back (S) 18 Door Back (SW)- 9 Wind Right (W) 0 Wind Back (S) 21 Wind Back (S) '12 Door Left (E) 3 Door Back (S) -4 Door Back (S) 25 Wind Right (W) 5 Wind Right (W) 7 Wind Back (S) 28 Wind Back (S) -9 Wind Back (S) Wind Back (S) .si Wind Left • (E) �? Wind Left (E) 3 Wind Left (E) 20.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.360 0.370 - 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Fixed 25.0 0.400 0.34.0 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Slider 25.0 0.400'0.340 0 90 Standard GLF4/Vinyl/Slider 20.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF5/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF6/Vinyl/Fixed 4.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF7/Vinyl/Fixed 25.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF8/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 6.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRtll/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt12/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt13/Vinyl/Slider 25.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR14/Vinyl/Slider 20.0 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR15/Wood/Hinged 15.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Slider 50.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Slider 48.0 0.370 0.340 225 90 Standard GLRR18/Wood/Hinged 13.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt19/Vinyl/Fixed 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR20/Vinyl/Slider 40.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Slider 48.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL22/Vinyl/Slider 48.0 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Slider 48.0 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Slider 9.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt25/Vinyl/Slider 30.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt26/Vinyl/Fixed 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR27/Vinyl%Slider 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR28/Vinyl/Fixed 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR29/Vinyl/Slider 25.0 0.360 0.370 '180 90 Standard GLR30/Vinyl/Fixed 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL31/Vinyl/Slider 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL32/Vinyl/Slider 8.0.0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL33/Viny1/Slider ".ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 --------_-------------------------------- Project'Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 ----------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION SURFACES Exterior Area U- Act Shade- irientation ----------------- (sf) factor ----- ----- SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments !4 Wind Left (E) 8.0 0.360 ----- 0.370. --- 90 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLL34/None/Fixed OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------- Area Left* Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension ___ . 3 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a. n/a: 7 Window 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a 8 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 9 Window_ 10..0 2 5 1 2 n/a n/a 10 Window 10.0 .2 5 1 2 n/a n/a 11 Window 6.0 .4 1.5. 1 2 n/a n/a 12 Window 10..0 2� 5 1 2 n/a n/a 13 Window 10.0 2 5 1 2 n/a n/a 14 Window 25.0 5 5 10 .5 n/a n/a 15 Door 20.0 2.5 8 10 .5 n/a n/A 17 Window 50.0 10 5 10 .5 n/a' n/a 18 Door' 48.0 '6 8 11.5 .5 n/a n/a 19 Window 13.0 2 6.5 46.1 .5 n/a n/a 21 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a 22 Door 48.0 6 8 . 24.3 .5 n/a n/a 23 Door 48.0 6 8 _10 .5 n/a n/a 24 Door 48.0 6 8 10 .5 n/a n/a 26 Window 30.0 6 5 24.3 .5 n/a n/a 28 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a ' 31 Window 10.0 2 5 1 2 n/a n/a 32 Window 10.0 -2 5 1 2 n/a n/a 33 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a 34 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 ------------------------------------------- project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 --------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Type ------------ Furnace ACSplit SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area s Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 4101 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a- n/a n/a n/a 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING ------------ System Type Furnace ACSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 66693 n/a Sensible Cooling Load (Btu/hr) n/a 57518 Design Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a 71380 Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a Orientation of Maximum:.... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location... ........ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design....... 26 F Winter Inside De.sign....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS ------------- Verified Verified,Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace Attic R-4.2 Yes -- No --------- No ACSplit Attic R-4.2 Yes No No CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 2roject Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R I User##-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank , External Heater in - Energy Size Insulation 'ank Type Type Distribution.Type System' Factor (gal) R-value --- ---------- ---------------- 1 Large Gas Standard 1 n/a 75 R-12 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS DETAIL Standby Internal Tank ' Recovery Rated Loss Insulation Pilot System Efficiency Input Fraction R-value ----- Light 1 Large .76 n/a --------------- .026 R-n/a ------- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS *** Items in this section should be documented on'the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications; and *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified` Refrigerant Charge test >r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a !ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not 'necessary- -his building.incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified..Duct Leakage. ` 'his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front acing North. 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. This building.incorporates a non-standard Water Heating System. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION --------------------------- *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a _ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. t -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 project Title.....'......,THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 ----------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 ------------------------------------ HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ---------------------- This building incorporates HERS verified EER. :his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is calculated and.documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM.is above the arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and .hen must be're_tested. Aiternatively, the compliance calculations.could be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS -erification is not necessary. REMARKS _,eak Sensible Cooling Load: 58 MBH Peak Sensible Heating Load': 67 MBH r { 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:' RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 8 ----------------------------------------- ...'THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Project Title..:..:. Date..07/07/05 13':28:57. ---------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 arid' 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the _,administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility., DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HIGHWAY 111'SUITE G Address.a 13691 Red Hill Ave. LA UINTA CA 92253, Tustin, CA 92780 Phone — (7 ) 77 -9920 Phone... (714) 838-1124 License. Signed. 3 cs : Signed.. (date) (da e) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name. .. Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. (date) iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ------------------ ------------------------------------ Project Title.......... THE ESTATES -PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 >roject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA ******* ---=----------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* . Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date \ Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ------- --------- 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ----------------------------_______ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING_ User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 -----------------------------------------=------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude....... ............. Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range.. ............. Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction:....... 4101 sf 41010 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description (Btu/hr) --------------------------- - ---------- ------ Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 29179 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11679 Infiltration.. ................... 15441 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts............................ 10394 -Sensible Load .................... 66693 Latent Load ..................... n/a Minimum Total Load 66693 0 deg (N) Cooling (Btu/hr) 16545 14986 8928 3440 9104 53003 0 53003 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered.. - It is the HVAC designer'-s responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil. sizing, must also be. consider all 'IVAC SIZING' HVAC Page 2 droject Title........... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05'13:28:57 MICROPAS7.v7.00 File-S0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area... ............ 4101 sf Volume... ................ 41010 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude. .............. 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used.....: Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang.Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING.LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar.....,. --- ----------- 29179 16928 Glazing Conduction and.Solar..... 11679 18342 Infiltration ...................... .15441 8928 Internal Gain ...................., n/a 3440 .Ducts.... ............. ..... 10394 9880 Sensible Load. .... ............ 66693. 57518 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load ---------------------- 66693 57518 Note: The loads shown are only one'of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements,' outside ai.r; outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing.safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. _1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 Project Title.......... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 -------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504110. Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206. User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. 4101 sf Volume... ........ .... 41010 cf Front Orientation...`...... 11. Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location...... .. . LA QUINTA Latitude..... ... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside•Design..... 26 F Winter Inside Design........ 70 F Summer Outside'Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Ye_s Exterior Shading Used...... Yes' Overhang Shading Used....... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 29179 16600 Glazing Conduction and.Solar..... 11679 15652 Infiltration ................... 15441 8928' Internal Gain ...................... n/a 3440 Ducts ....... ............. ...... 10394 9254. Sensible Load ................ .... 66693 53873 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 66693 53873 Note: The-loads.shown are only one'of the criteria affecting the selection of. HVAC' equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow' requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability. of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. -It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the'HVAC equipment. -ZVAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 Project Title ........... THE ESTATES PLAN 6 Date..07/07/05 13:28:57 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-$0504110 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES PLAN 6' GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area. .... ........ 4101 sf Volume ................. 41010 cf Front Orientation.......... Front -Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ...............:.... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside.Design...... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range... .......... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction.:..... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 29179 16882 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 11679 17870 Infiltration. ............ 15'441 8928 Internal Gain .................... n/a 3440 Ducts . ......................... 10394 9772 Sensible Load .................... 66693 56892. Latent Load.......... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 66693 56892 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. ..Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design .temperatures, coil sizing, availability of, equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to. consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. BUILDING SUMMARY • { THE ESTATES CASITA, RANI) SWIANA JOB NLNBER 050412 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INS IIATICN: , NEW EXT FALL R13 NEW ATTIC OEILING R30 DUCT INSULATICN RB , PERIMETER INSIIIATION NONE GLASS FILE NfI• 3ER 10 . PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALVE • PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROVIDE AIR FLOW VERIFICATION 4 PROPOSED BUIIDIING GLASS CCNF'IGLWMCN: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E CLASS PER CF-IR FBI THRouGH3UT EQUIPMENT SIZIN33 REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE CIBTIRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREIENIS: 1. HEUMG CAPACITY TO MEET MINIM M BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 14577.BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLUMINg, HEATP MP HSPF = 8.00 AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 13.00 EATER HEATER EF = 0.63 FATER.HEATER BLANKET = R-0 3. MM HEATER SIZE TD NOT F7CC£ED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELECTION; THEREFORE, THE FTNAL'SELECTICN MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REM TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALOIIATICNS. THE FOLLOWING SELECTI NS ARE FOR REFII2FNC= ONLY. • f DQUIRENT _ WY MAKE M3DET BTUWHR TlY1S EQUIPMEMU QTY MAKE MODEL, G,LTI-NS BIJW(ET . EATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG122-40T40-3DIMV 40.00 R-0 RESULTS: a141AIANCE IS BASED ON THE WORST CAM PFRFORMKE ANALYSIS METHOD. GLASS SUMMARY THE EMMES CASITA, RANG D SANTANA JOB NUMBER 050412' FRA4M OPENING GLAZING SHADING NCM ORIENTATION WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE ' 2 FRONT 5.00 2.00 RBaXAR vim SLIDER DIAL 3 RIGHT 2.00 5.00 REaJIAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 4 FRONT 1.50 1.50 RE13U AR VINYL FIXED DUAL 5 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 R83UTAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 6REAR ' 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR' WOOD HINGED DUAL 7 REAR 5.00 _ 5.00 REGULAR - VINYL SLIDER DtAI, 8 LEFT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR vim SLIDER DUAL, 9 LEFT 2.00 5.00 P33UJAR VINYL SLIDER DLML 10 LEFT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL L ill.LEFT 2.00' 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, ' 1 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CFf-lR Page 1 Project Title.......... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 Iroject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA *******--------- ---------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 _____-__-__ __-__-__ _'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design' Design Margin = _ Space Heating ........... 12.83 4.34 71.51 = = Space Cooling.......... 100.30 99:66 0.64 = = Water Heating.......... 28.26 24.35 3.91 = _ North Total .131.39 128.35 3.04 = = Space Heating.......... 2.83 4.46 -1.63 = = Space Cooling.......... 100.30_ 99.62 0.68 = _ Water Heating.......... 28.26 24.35 3.91 = = East Total 131.39 128.43 2.96 - = Space Heating .......... 2.83 4.57 -1.74 = = Space Cooling.. ...... 100.30 98.05 2.25. - = Water Heating........... 28.26 24.35 3.91 = = South Total 131.39 126.97 4.42 = = Space Heating.......... 2.83 4.45 -1.62 = = Space Cooling.......... 100.30 97.81 2.49 = = Water Heating.......... 28.26 24.35 3.91 = _ West Total 131.39 126.61 4.78 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 Project Title....:... . THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/0.7/05.14:03:14 --------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required. - Conditioned Flbor Area..... 568 sf Building Type........ .... Single Family Detached Construction Type . New Fuel Type ................. NaturalGas Building -Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type...... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume.......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor.:. Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade 1 5680 cf 568sf 24.1 % of floor area 0.39 Btu/hr-sf-F .0.34 10 ft , BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION ---------------------- Floor # of Vent. Vent Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat 'Height Area Zone Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned. Type , (ft) (sf) ------------------ :------- ------------ ---- ------ ----- ------- Residence 568 5680 1.00 Yes SetBack '2.0 Standard OPAQUE SURFACES --------------- urface 1 RoofRad 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Wall 6 Door U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Type (sf), or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Wood 568 0.032 30 0 n/a 0 Yes IV.1 A7 Wood 171 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9-A3 Wood 225 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 Wood 190 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 Wood 240 0..102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 Other 37 0.500 0 0 270 90 Yes IV.28 A4. I Verified , Leakage or Housewrap No Location/ Comments New Attic Ceil New Ext Wall New Ext Wall New Ext Wall. New Ext Wall Exterior Door -;ERTIFICATE OF.COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 eroject,Title.......... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 -------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User, -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------=--- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments ------------ --------------------- -------------- ---------------------- 7 SlabEdge 100 0.730 R-0 No IV.26 Al Covered FENESTRATION SURFACES Exterior Area U- Act Shade Orientation ----------------- (sf) ----- factor ----- SHGC ----- Azm_Tilt --- -Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 17.5 0.400 0.340 0 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Front (N) 10.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Right (W) 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Wind Front (N) 2.3 0.360 0.370 0. 90 Standard GLF4/Vinyl/Fixed 5 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90. Standard GLRtS/Vinyl/Slider 6 Door Back (S) 24.0 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR6/Wood/Hinged 7 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR7/Vinyl/Slider 8 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL9/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0_340 90 90 Standard GLL10/Vinyl/Slider 1 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL11/Vinyl/Slider OVERHANGS -Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left . Right Surface ----------- (s.f) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 2 Window ----- 10.0 ----- 5 ------ 2 ----- 2 ------ 1.67 =-------- n/a --------- n/a 3 Window 10.0 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 4 Window 2.3 1.5 1.5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 5 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a 6 Door 24.0 3 8 1 1.67 n/a n/a 7 Window 25.0 5 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 8 Window 10.0 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 9 Window 10.0 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 10 Window 10.0 2 5 1 .1.67 n/a n/a 11 Window 10.0 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 0 ".ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 --------------------------------------- Project Title.......... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 -------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA -------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Type ------------ HPSplit HPSpl i.t Number of Systems 1 1 SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard'Slab 568 Minimum Efficiency 8.00 HSPF 13.00 SEER System Type ------------- HPSplit HPSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 1457.7 n/a HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Verified Verified Verified.Maximum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling EER or TXV Airflow. Draw Capacity n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11.2 Yes Yes No No HVAC SIZING Sensible Cooling Load (Btu/hr) n/a 12876 Design Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a 15979 Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a Orientation of Maximum...:. Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location.. ....... LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design........ 70 F Summer Outside Design....:.. 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS ------------- Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type ------------- Location R-value ----------- Leakage Area Ducts .HPSplit ------- Attic R-8 ------- Yes -------- No ------ --- No HPSplit Attic R-8 Yes No. No "ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE :.RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 ------------------------------------------ r1roject Title.......... THE ESTATES'CASITA Date..07•/07/05-14:03:14 ---------------- ------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External. Heater in Energy Size Insulation -'ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------------------------ - ----- ------ -------------- - -------------- 1 Storage I Gas Standard 1 .63 40 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ------------------------------- ---------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified -Refrigerant Charge test or a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). Ifa !ooling•system is.not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary This building incorporates HERS verified EER. 'his building incorporates HERS verified Adequate Air Flow and .HERS verified duct design and layout. 'his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. This is,a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front "acing North. This building incorporates a Radiant. Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under. *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R.installation certificate. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve '(TXV). If a Doling system is'not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. -his building incorporates HERS verified EER. 'rnis building incorporates HERS verified Adequate Air Flow and. uE'RS verified duct design and layout. The air conditioning system ist be verified for adequate air flow and the duct design, _ayout and calculations must be included in the submittal. r 7ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 t'roject Title......,... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14' ---------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 W.th-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering, Run -THE ESTATES CASITA -------------- HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION` ""his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is l alculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the ,arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively,'the compliance calculations could be "edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS* -erification is not necessary. REMARKS Oeak Sensible Cooling Load:..13 MBH ,eak Sensible Heating Load: 15 MBH �t . =TIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 ziroject Title........... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 ---------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT --------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 `of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative' regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR. Name.... Name.... James 'H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HIGHWAY 111 SUITE G Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave-. LA QUINTA CA.92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (7 77 -9920 Phone... (714) 838-1124 License: % ) Signed.. � � 3 s )' Signed.. (date) date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name. Title.. .Agency.. Phone... Signed.. (date) iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 -----------.------------------------------- Project Title......:... THE ESTATES CASITA Date...07/07/05 14:03:14 'roject Address.......: RANCHO SANTANA ******* ---- ----------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ! ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA .92780 (714) 838-1124 Field -Check/ Date 'limate Zone... -- ...... 15 __________-_ compliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude .................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design.... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ...........:.. Interior Shading Used...:.. Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 568 sf 5680 cf Front Facing 0 deg (N) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description (Btu/hr) ----------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction Conduction and Solar ....... 8540 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 2371 Infiltration ..................... 2139 Internal Gain .................... n/a* Ducts ............................ 1527 Sensible Load .................... 14577 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total.Load 14577 Cooling (Btu/hr) 4098 3660 1237 2060 1743 12797 0 12797 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It_ is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all "IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 Project Title.......... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14' MICROPAS7 v7.00. File-S0504120Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206User-Terry Engineering Run-THE'ESTATES CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.... ............. 568 sf Volume .................... 5680 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 90 deg(E) Sizing Location............. LA QUINTA. Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees . Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70.F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F ..Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used....... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent.Load Fraction.....'.. 0 HEATING.AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ---------------------- 8540 3827 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 2371 3773 Infiltration......'. .. ........ 2139 1237 Internal Gain............`........ n/a 2060 Ducts ............................ 1527 1718 , Sensible Load .................... 14577 12614 Latent Load.... .................. n/a „ 0 Minimum Total Load 14577 12614 a Note:_ The loads shown are only one.of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment',, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC.designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. TIVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 Project Title........... THE ESTATES CASITA -Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 ------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15SO5 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering. Run -THE ESTATES CASITA. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.......... ..... 568 sf Volume ..................... 5680 cf \Front Orientation.......... Front Facing Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter.Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design..%... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...::. Yes Exterior Shading Used ....... Yes Overhang shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 180 deg (S) HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Cooling. Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) --------------------------------- - ----------- ' ----------- Opaque Conduction and Solar..... Glazing Conduction and Solar..... Infiltration ...................... Internal Gain..................... Ducts ............................ Sensible Load..................... Latent Load ...................... 8540 4104 2371. 3456 2139 1237 n/a 2060 1527 1711 14577 12568 n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 14577 12.568 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is .the HVAC designer's -responsibility to factors when selecting the.HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all 'IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 r'roject Title........... THE ESTATES CASITA Date..07/07/05 14:03:14 -------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504120 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 568 sf Volume ..................... 5680 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing'270 deg (W) Sizing Location........ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 -F Winter Inside Design.....:. 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34•F Interior Shading Used....... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----=------ •8540 ----------- 3878 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 237i 3948 Infiltration ..................... 2139 1237 Internal Gain..... ............. n/a. 2060 Ducts...... ..................... 1527 1753 Sensible Load ..................... 14577 12876 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 14577 12876 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air,•outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment,.oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility 'to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. ' BUILDING SUMMARY • THE EST91TE4 CABANA, RANCID SANIANA JOB NLMBFR 050413 PROPOSED BUILDII40 ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT FALL R13 NEW ATTIC CRILIM R30 DUCE INS IIATICN R8 PERIINEIER INSI) ATRCBN NONE ^ GLASS FILE NLTIUM 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST POVIDE TX VALVE PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROVIDE AIR FLOW VERIFICATICN PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONFIGURATION: NFIGURAT ION: PROVIDE mmLE PANE CIImFIED IOW E aASS.PER cF-1R FORM THAT EQUIPMENT SIZIW. REQUIREMENIS: NE74 EQUIR7F c TO BE SE3ECLED BY THE CIBSLRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING I2E(;UIRIIjNLB: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIM M BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 11610 BITJH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR G2F= THAN THE FOUaATING: HEATPMP HSPF = 8.00 AIR O3IDITiam SEER = 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.63 WATER DATER BLANKET = R-0 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EX® THE SIZE SHM N. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY EN3IN EtING IS NOT RESPCNSSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELEMON; THEREFORE, THE F1bAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED CN DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER:' REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD alla .A CNS. r THE FOLSOWIIr, SELFXTICEIS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. r DQUIiT9EZU ' GZY MAKE mom BnWHR TONS HEUT MP 1 (1) BRYANT 65OA024 24000 EACH 2.0 EQUIPMENT CIL'Y MAKE MODEL GAId18NS BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN EG122-40T40-3NOMMV 40.00 R-0 RESULTS: r 024PLIANCE IS BASED CPO THE WORST CASE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS MEiiM., r j. GLASS SUMMARY • THE ESIXIES CABANA; RANCHD SAWDM JOB K]MBER 050413 _ Y - • FRAMING OPENING GLAZING SHADING NL]M CRIFNPATICN WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MPaT IAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRONT 3.00 5.00 . RD3ULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL, 2 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REXLAR VINYL SLIDER DLAL 3 RIGHT 5.00.• 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED DIAL 4 REAR 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYLSLIDER DUAL 5 LEFT 2.00 5.00 REOULAR VINYL SLIDER Dukl, 6 LEFT 2.00 5.00 RD3ILAR '• VINYL SLIDER DAL a f 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 project- Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:0011 Iroject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA ******* - --- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA .92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone...... ... 15 ------------------- .'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7-v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Eriercomp, Inc., -------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-lR User#7MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA MICROPAS7*ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed .Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating........ 2.88 5.73 -2.85 = = Space Cooling............ 116.33 117.67 -1.34 = = Water Heating.......... . 40.74 34.61 6.13 = = North Total 159.95 -158.01 1.94 = = Space Heating.......... 2.88 5.74 -2.86 = = Space Cooling........... 116.33 .116.33 0.00 - = Water Heating.......... 40.74 34.61 6.13 = _ East Total 159.95 156.68 3.27 = = Space Heating.......... 2.88 5.41 -2.53 = = Space Cooling.......... 116.33 119.74 -3.41 = = Water Heating.......... . 40.74 34.61 6.13 = = South Total 159.95 159.76 0:19 = = Space Heating.... ...... 2.88 .5.90 -3.02 = - Space Cooling.......... 116.33 112.01 4.32 = Water Heating.......... 40.74 34.61 6.13' _ _. West Total 159.95 152.52 7.43 _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification.Required for Compliance ^.ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 --------------------------------- ?roject Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 ----------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering -Run-THE ESTATES CABANA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 374 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Fuel Type .. NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number.of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......,.. FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average -Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... } Slab On Grade 1 3740 cf 374 sf 28.9 % of floor area 0.39 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.34 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of . Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft)- (sf)' Housewrap -------- ----- ------- ---------- Residence 374 3740 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf). or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference' Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 374 0.032 30 0 n/a ---- 0 --- Yes --------- IV.1'A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 162 0.102 13 '13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 146 0.102 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 145 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood '173 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 6 Door Other 19 0.500 0 0 270 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door 7 Door Other. 37 0.500 0 0 90 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door I '7ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 �Iroject Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 ------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering. Run -THE ESTATES CABANA ----------------------------=-------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments ------------ --------------------- -------------- ---------------------- 8 SlabEdge 80 0.730 R-0 No IV.26 Al Covered FENESTRATION SURFACES Exterior'` Area U- Act Shade Orientation ----------- - - - - -- (sf) - - - --- factor - - - -- SHGC -- - - Azm'Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 - 0.340 --- 0 ---- 90 ------ -- 'Standard ------------------------ GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Door Right (W) 40.0 0.370 0.340.270 90 Standard GLRt3/Wood/Hinged 4 Wind Back (S) 8.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR4/Vinyl/Slider, 5 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLLS/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Left (E) 10.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL6/Vinyl/Slider OVERHANGS Area Surface (sf) 1 Window 15.0 2 Window 25.0 3 Door 40.0 4 Window 8.0 5 Window 10.0 6 Window 10.0 ---Window--- ------ ----Overhang-------`----- Left Right Width Height Depth Height.Extension Extension 3 5 2 1.67 n/a n/a 5 5 11 1.67 n/a n/a 5 8 11 1.67 n/a n/a 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 2 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES ------------- Slab - Type ---------------- Standard Slab Area (sf) 374 -ERTIFICATE'OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 Project Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 ---------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES.CABANA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HVAC SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or'TXV. Airflow Draw Capacity HPSplit 1 8.00 HSPF n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a HPSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes Yes No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load_ Capacity.- Capacity Type (.Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) • (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) HPSplit 11610 n/a n/a' n/a HPSplit n/a 10268 12743 n/a Orientation of Maximum..... Front Facing 0 deg (N) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside De'sign....... 75 F Summer Range.. 34 F ...DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts HPSplit Attic R-8 (Yes No No HPSplit Attic R-8 Yes No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater. in Energy Site Insulation _ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------------ ------------------------- -------------- ---------------- 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .63 40 R- n/a s -ERTIFICATE.OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 ------------------------------- Project Title.......... THE ESTATES. CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05. Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA I' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test )r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Adequate Air Flow and [ERS verified duct.design and layout. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. 'his is a multiple orientation building. -This printout is for the front facing North. 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and"/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** _'his building incorporates a HERS verified -Refrigerant Charge test or a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve.(TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates'HERS verified Adequate Air Flow and nERS verified .duct design and layout. The air conditioning system must be verified 'for adequate air flow and the duct design, ayout and calculations must be included in the submittal. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is alculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be -edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed,' then HERS erification is not necessary'. o ^.ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 ---------------------------------------------- project Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date:.07/07/05 14:00:11. ------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-50504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF=1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA -------------------------------------- 7--------- ------------------------------- i REMARKS Deak Sensible Cooling Load: 10.5 MBH leak Sensible Heating Load: 12 MBH e COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance.lists the building features specifications needed to .comply with Title-24, Parts 1 California Code of Regulations, and the administrative implement them. This certificate has been signed by the overall design responsibility. and performance and 6 of the regulations to individual with DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name...,. James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HIGHWAY 111 SUITE G Address..13691 Red Hill Ave. LA UINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (7 ) 777-9920 Phone...' (714) 838-1124 License. Signed.. IVY -a Signed.. (date)- (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. (date) [VAC SIZING ------------ HVAC Page 1 project Title.......... ------------------------------------- THE ESTATES CABANA Date,..07/07/05 14:00:11 'roject Address........ RANCHO SANTANA ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ----------_-------- 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Ener-comp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 -------------------------------- File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 ----------------------------------.--------------------------------------------- User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA GENERAL INFORMATION -------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume. : ..... i ............ olume..................... Front Orientation.. ...... Sizing Location............ Latitude ................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 374 sf 3740 cf Front Facing 0 deg'(N) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY ------------------------ Heating Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 7138 Glazing Conduction and Solar.-' . 1848 Infiltration ..................... 1408 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts .... ......... .............. 1216 SensibleLoad..................... 11610 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 11610 Cooling (Btu/hr) 3438 2558 814 2060 1398 10268 0 10268 Note:'The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant, design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all a 'TVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 r)roject Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 --------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA --------------.---------------------------------------------------------------- - GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area................. 374 sf Volume.........:.. ... 3740 cf Front'Orientation.:...... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location............. LA QUINTA Latitude ....:.............. 33..8 degrees Winter Outside.Des.gn...... 26 F Winter Inside Design......*.. 70 F Summer Outside Design..:.... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range. ..... 34 F Interior -Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang'Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction ......... 0 HEATING AND COOLING --------------------------------- LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr), (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....... 7138 3.205 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 1848 2499 Infiltration ..... I.................. 1408 814 Internal Gain .................... n/a 2060 Ducts ............... ........... 1216 1352 ..Sensible Load... .......... .. 11610 9931 Latent Load...... ................ n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 11610 9931 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant- design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor --.design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It' is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. '4 n 'iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 ---------------------------------- r'roject Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 --------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-'HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 374 sf Volume ................ ... 3740 cf .Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 180 deg (S)' Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude.. .. ........... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design:..... 111 F Summer Inside Design........ 75 F Summer Range........ 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING.AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar.:.... 7138 Glazing Conduction.and Solar..... 1848 Infiltration ..................... 1408 Internal Gain ................. n/a Ducts........ ... ............ 1216 Sensible Load .................... 11610 Latent Load..... ................ . n/a Minimum Total Load 11610 Cooling (Btu/hr) 3433 2413 814 2060 1375 10095 0 10095 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor.. design temperatures, coil sizing,_ availability of equipment, oversizing safety -margin, etc., must also be considered.., It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. _1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 --------------------- Project Title.......... THE ESTATES CABANA Date..07/07/05 14:00:11 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0504130 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC'SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -THE ESTATES CABANA --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ........:........ 374 sf Volume ..................... 3740 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............. LA QUINTA Latitude. ......33.8 degrees Winter ,Outside Design.....'.. -26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F, Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction.... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....... 7138 3169 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 1848 2434 Infiltration............. ....... 1408 814 Internal Gain ............ ......... n/a 2060 Ducts. .......... .............. 1216 1336 Sensible Load...... ....... ...... 11610 9813 . Latent Load.. ............... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 11610 9813 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. Sladden Engineering g g 6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax'(714) 523-1369 39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895 February 6; 2003 Project No. 5 t 1-,001 '03-02-068 Desert Elite, Inc. 78-401 Highway I 11, Suite G La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mr. John Pedalino Subject: GeotechnicalInvest 1oation Project: Proposed'80 Acre Residential -Development Monroe Ranch — APN 767-200-004 and 005 S WC Monroe Street and Avenue 5 ) La Quinta, California Presented herewith is the report of our Geotechnical Investigation at the site of the proposed approximately 80 acre residential subdivision located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and AvemlC 52 in the City of La Quinta, California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in foundation design for the proposed single-family residences and the related site improvements. This report presents the results of our field investigation and laboratory testi,ng.aloho with conclusions and recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. Thin report completes our original scope of services as understood. We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to YOU on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned Respectfully submitted, SLADDEN ENGINEERING Brott L. Anders n Principal Envineer SER/pc Copies: 6/Desert Elite, Inc. � ' GEOTECHN/C/\L|NYESTIGAT0N PROPOSED 80ACREk[S|D£NTA\LDEVEL0Pk4ENT' MONKOEKANCH � �3VVCM0NR0GSTREET AND AVENUE 52 ' LA0U/NTA.CALIFORNIA � ' � � . Fe6morly6`2003 TABLC0FCONTENTS � INTRODUCTION , -------------------------------� ' SCOPE OFWORK ` ----'------^-------------------� | '' PROJECT DESCRIPTION -----------------------'--' | GEOLOGY AND 3EI3K�|C}TY � ' | `'' � -----------`---------- . SU83UKFACECOND[T|(}N3 —'--------� 2 --'---------------------'�� LIQUEFACTION � --`----' ----------------'-----... '.2 ' . rONCLUS|(�NSAND RECO��K�END/\T0NS --------' --------------� ] FnuodobouDesigh ---------'-----------'`--------^ ] 4 ` Settlements` �'� ----------------------------------' Lateral DoxiCFn ----'-- -------------------------`-------^ 4 4 ---� Retaining Walls ---------------------------�� Expansive Solis .------- ------'`------------------------. � - ' Concrn�S|xhx+ou-3mdn ---------------------------� —� j So/uN�3o|f�� ----.^. -----~---------`-----------��---_—� j ' ' Tentative PovcmcntDcy� ------ /"n—`---------'�-----------' 5 Shrinkage and Suhsiduncc --------� ---------------------------� —'—' j 6 � Gcncm| Site Oradin� --------------------------------- 0 ` |. 3i0cC|curiu�. '--' � ------------------------------- 6 Z Prupangiono[8ui|din�und FoundmionA�us � -------' --'--------' '' 6 IPlacement o[Compuc�d]FiU "- ' ------------------r--------'6 � � 4. Preparation o[Slab and PuvemontAreas -----------'_--------. 6 5.Testing and |nopecbon -----------------'-------� 7 GENERAL............................................... �---- --------------------' -----�—' 7 REFERENCES -------------`---'------.------------------ 8 ' APPENDIX /\' Site Plan and Borio'-Loos ` ' ricNCxp/oradou � � APPENDIX B' Laboratory Testing ^ Laboratory Test Resu|[s ' ` APPENDIX |997UBCSeismic Design bri1criu � � -- I"ebruary 6. 22OU3 -I- Project No: 5 44-3001 03-02-069- INTRODUCTION t I -his report presents the results Of' our Geotechnical Investigation performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in the design and construction of the foundations ,*()I - tile proposed residential structures. The project site is located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta, California. The preliminary plans indicate that the proposed project will - include single-family residences alone' with various •associated site Improvements. Associated improvements will include paved roadways, concrete driveways, .walkways and patios, underground utilities, and landscape areas. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to determine certain engineering characteristics of the near surface soils on the site in order to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. OUr investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, literature review. engineering analysis and the preparation of this report. Evaluation of hazardous materials or other environmental concerns was not within the scope of services provided. Our investigation was performed in accordance with contemporary geotechnical engineering principles a'nd practice. We Blake no other warranty, either express or implied. PROJECT DESCR[PT[ON The site is located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta, California. It is our understanding that the project will consist of single-family residences along with Various associated site improvements.. It is our understanding that the proposed residences will —be of relatively lightweight wood -frame construction' and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs on. grade. ,The associated. improvements will include paved roadways, concrete walkways, patios, driveways, landscape areas and various underground utilities. The majority of the subject site' is presently vacant and the ground surface is covered witli•turf. The properties surrounding the site to the south are presently occupied by agricUltural fields. Avenue 52 and Monroe Street are paved adjacent to the site and Underground and overhead .Utilities exist along the streets. There are Underground irrigation pipes along the edges of the site and traversing the site. Based Upon our previous experience With lightweight residential structures, �Ve expect that isolated column loads will be less than Akips and wall loading Will be less than to 2.0 kips per linear foot. Grading is expected to include minor cuts and tills to match the nearby elevations and to construct sli�,htly elevated buildin`; pads to accommodate site draina-e. This does not include removal and recompaction of the bearing soils within the building areas. ,If the anticipated foundation loading or site .,rading varies substantially from 'that assumed the recommendations .included in th,is report should be reevaluated. L Sludden Engiueeri'li I`ebruary 6. 2003 Project No.. 544-3001 03-02-068 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY 'I'he project site is located within the central Coachella Valley that is part of the broader..Salton Trough �,eomorphic province. The Salton Trough is a northwest trending depression that extends from the Gulf of* California to the Banning Pass. Structurally the Salton Trough is dominated by several northwest trencdin, fMwlts, most notable of which is the San Andreas system. A relatively thick sequence of.sedinlentary rocks have been deposited in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough from Miocene to present times. These sediments are predominately terrestrial in nature with some lacustrian and minor marine deposits. The mountains surrounding'the Coachella Valley are composed primarily of Precambrian metamorphic and Mesozoic granitic rock. The Coachella Valley is situated in one of the more seismically active areas of California. The San Andreas fault zone is considered capable of generating a maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 8.0 and due to its proximity to the project site the distance of approximately 6.5 kilometers -Should be considered in design fault for the project. A Seismic activity along the nearby faults continues to affect the area and the Coachella Valley is considered one of the more seismically active regions in California. A computer program and pertinent ,eologic literature were utilized to compile data related to earthquake fault zones in the region and previoiu seismic activity that may have affected the site. E.Q. Fault Version 3.00 (Blake) provides a compilation of data related to earthquake faults in the region. The program searches available databases and provides both distances to causitive faults and the corresponding accelerations that may be experienced on the site due to earthquake activity along these faults. The attenuation relationship utilized for this project was based upon Joyner &. Boore (1987) attenuation curves. The information generated was utilized in our, liquefaction evaluation The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State but is mapped in the County's Liquefaction and Ground Shaking Hazard Zone V. ySeveral significant seismic events have. occurred within the Coachella Valley during the past 50 years. The events include Desert Hot Springs - 1948 (6.5 Magnitude), Palm Springs - 1986 (5.9 Magnitude), Desert Hot Springs - 1992 (6.1 Magnitude),; Landers - 1992 (7.5 Magnitude) and Big Bear - 1992 (6.6 Magnitude). SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Tile -Soils underlying the site consist primarily of silty sands, sandy silts and clayey silts. As is typical for the area, the silty sand and sandy silt layers are interbedded and vary in thickness. Silty sands were the most prominent soils within our exploratory borings but several prominent clayey silt and silty clay layers Were also encountered. The sandy silts and silty sands encountered near the existing ground surface appeared somewhat loose but the deeper soils appeared relatively firm. Sampler penetration resistance (as measured by field blowcounts) indicate that density generally increases with depth. Relatively undisturbed samples indicated dry density varying from 79 to 113 pcf. The site soils were dry near the surface but wet below a depth of 5 or 10 feet. Measured moisture content varied from 4 to 42 percent. Laboratory testing indicates that the surface soils within the upper 5 feet consist primarily of an inconsistent mixture of silty sands and sandy silts. Expansion testing indicates an expansion index of 0 li)r the surface silty sands that are classified as "very low" expansion category soils in accordance with Table 18-1-B of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Sluddeir Eizghteerrng February b,'003' -,- Project Na: 544-30U1 03-0?-0GS Groundwater was encountered at. a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface within boring I . The presence.of groundwater should not impact site grading or construction. LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction occurs with sudden loss of soil strength due to rapid increases in pore pressures within cohesionless soils as a result of repeated cyclic loading during seismic events. Several conditions mist be present for liquefaction to occur- including; the presence of relatively shallow groundwater, generally loose soils conditions, the susceptibility of soils to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics and the generation of significant and repeated seismically induced ground accelerations. Liquefaction affects primarily loose, uniform grained cohesionless sands with low relative densities. In the case of this project site, several of the factors required for liquefaction to occur are present. As . previously indicated, groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existin, grOLInd surface on the site.. Several relatively uniform grained sand and silty sand layers .were encountered within our borings. The site is located near an active fault system. GI-01.1ndwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface. Due to the depth to groundwater, the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is' limited. Although several silty sand layers appear susceptible to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics, the lack, ofgroundwater within the upper 40 Feet should minimize liquefaction potential. . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our field investigation and laboratory testis`**, it is our opinion that the proposed residential development is feasible front a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in buildiig foundation design and site preparation. Due to the somewhat loose condition of the surface soils and the. potential for delineated settlements, remedial grading is recommended for the building areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and recompaction of the primary foundation bearing soils. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site Grading section of this report. Based upon the depth to groundwater, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is negligible. The remedial grading recommended for building areas will result in the construction of a uniform compacted soil mat beneath all footings. In ou►-Opinion, liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the site grading and foundation design recommendations included in this report should not be necessary. The site is located'in one of the more seismically active areas in California. Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of the structure should be acknowledged- The accelerations that may be experienced on the site (as previously discussed) should be considered in design. The seismic prrn`isions included in the Uniform BuiIC11110 . Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the IIIIIlIIl1LIrn design criteria. Pertinent 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria is sunllilarized in Appendix C. Shuhlen Ejtghieerinq February 6. 2003 -4- r Project No..544-3001 03-02-068 Caving did Occur within our boring and the potential liar caving should he expected within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSI-IA excavation criteria. On the basis of our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the near surface sandy silts and silty sands will be classified by CaIOSI-I.A as Type C..Soil conditions should be verified in theafield h1 a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The near surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to be non -expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 0 for the surface silty sands that corresponds with the "very low"expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-1-B. The fUIlUwlllg recommendations present more detailed design criteria that have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation' The reconuiiendations are based upon non -expansive soils criteria. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings that are supported upon properly compacted soils, may be expected to provide adequate support for the proposed structure foundations. BUilding pad grading should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and firm bearing conditions for the sh•ucture foundations. a Footings should extend at least 12 inches beneath .lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings should be at least ? feet square and continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Continuous footings may be designed using an allowable bearing valise of 1500 Pounds per square foot (fast) acid isolated pad footings may be designed Using an allowable bearing pressure of 1800 psf. The allowable bearing pressures are applicable to dead and frequently applied live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by 1/3 to resist hind and seismic loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soils are not g of. rainwater or irrigation. Drainage from the allowed to become saturated from the pondin building area should be rapid and complete. ` The recommendations provided in the preceding paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings will be supported upon properly compacted engineered fill soils. All grading should be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soils Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be approximately one inch when using the recommended bearing values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.10 between soil and concrete may be used with consideration to dead load forces only.. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings that are poured against properly compacted native or approved non -expansive impOrt soils. Passive earth pressure should be ignored within the upper I foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Sladdeir Emg ineering February 6, 2003 -5- Project No.. 544 300I • 0 3-02-065 Retaining Walls: Retainin�t, walls may be necessary to accomplish the proposed construction. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using all equivalent Fluid weight of 40 pcl� for level free -draining native backfill conditions. For walls that are to be restrained at the top, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 60 pcf for level free- draiiiing native 1)ackfill conditions. l3ackdrains should be provided for the gull height of the walls. Expansive Soils: Due to the prominence of"very low" expansion category soils near the surface, the expansion potential of the foundation bearing soils should not be a controlling factor in foundation or floor slab design. Expansion potential should be reevaluated subsequent to grading. •, - Concrete Slabs -on -Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted non -expansive fill thickness of 24 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where.dampness of the floor slab is not'desired, we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break.' Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaimlIg'uniform concrete curing. Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures should not be necessary. However,- reinforcement \vill have a beneficial effect in containing cracking due to concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs -on -grade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soils were determined to be 100 parts per million (ppm), which is generally considered non corrosive with respect to concrete. The use of Type V cement and specialized sulfate resistant "concrete mix designs should not be necessary. Tentative Pavement Design: All paving should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excludina aggregate base). This may be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. R-Value testing was not conducted during our investigation but based upon the silty nature of the surface soils, an R-Value of approximately 50 appears appropriate for preliminary -pavement design for onsite roadways. The following preliminary pavement section is based upon a design R-Value of 50. Parking areas and areas limited to auto and light truck traffic (Traffic Index = 5.0) Use 3.0 inches of asphalt on 4.0 inches of Class 2 base material Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard Specifications. January 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended'sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations durifiu placement. ' Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of site grading when the subgrade soils are in -place. This will include sampling and testing oft he actual subgrade soils and an analysis based upon the specific traffic information Sladden Engineering February 6, 1-003 -6- Project. No.. 544-3001 03-02-068 Shrinkage and Subsidence: VOILImetrlc shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage could vary from li to 20 percent. Subsidence.of the surfaces that are scarilied and compacted should he between 0.1 and 0.3 tenths ol'a foot. This \vill vary depending upon the type of equipment used: the ntuisture content of the soil at the time of �,rading and thr aetual clegree of contpactic�n attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses that will Occur due to the strippil--Ofthe organic material from the site and the removal of oversize material. General Site Grading:' All grading should'be. performed in accordance with the oradin�� ordinance of the City of La Quinta, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis Of Our field and laboratory testing and are intended to provide a uniform compacted mat of soil beneath the building slabs and foundations. 1. Site Clearing: , Proper site clearing will be very important. Any existing vegetation, slabs, foundations, abandoned underground utilities or irritation lines should be removed from the proposed building areas and the resulting excavations should be properly backfllled. Soils that are disturbed during site clearing shOuld be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soils Engineer. , 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: In order to provide adequate and uniform bearing Condit, we recommend overexcavation throughout the proposed building areas. The building areas should be overexcavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below existing grade or 2, feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. The exposed soils should then be scarified. to a depth of 11`66t. moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent relativecompaction. The excavated material may then be replaced as engineered till material as recommended below. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Within the building pad areas, till materials should be spread in thin lifts, and compacted at near optimum moisture content to a minimum Of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported fill material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor shall notify the Soils Enuineer at least 48 hours in advance of importilto soils in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site that complies with the project specifications. Approval by the'Soils Engineer will be based upon material delivered to the site and not the preliminary evaluation of import SOurces. Our observations of the materials encountered during Our investigation indicate that compaction within the native soils will be most readily obtained by means of heavy,, .. - rubber tired equipment and/or sheepsfoot compactors. A uniform and near optiliium moisture content should be maintained d.-11-Fill placement and compaction. 4. ['reparation of Slab and Paving Areas: .AII surfaces to receive asphalt concrete pavin��. or exterior concrete slabs -on -grade, should be underlain by a It1111II11U111 compacted fill thickness of I? inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation, scarification and recompaction of the surface, and replacement of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. COntpaction of the slab and pavement areas should be to a minimum of90 percent relative compaction. Slarlden Enl; iaeer irr, February G, ?003 -7- . Pro_juct No.. 54 4r3001 03-02-068 S. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations should be performed,bv . the Soils Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being, performed in accordance ,with' tile project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable ASTiVI test standards. 'The minimum acceptable degree of compaction shall be 90 percent of' tile maximum dry density,as obtained by the ASTM D1557-91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. GENERAL The findings and recommend"atioiis•presented'in.this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation,of these conditions* throughout the proposed building, area. - Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this . report. this office should be notified. ' This report is considered to be applicable for use by Desert Elite, Inc., Inc. for the specilic site and project described herein. The Ilse of.this report.by other parties or .for other projects is not authorized.,. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon monitoring, of the grading operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our reVIOW of the -grading operations and additional testing, if, indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to coordinate and required site visits hV our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering. We recommend that a pre- ob conference beheld on the site pi iar to the initiation of site grading. The Purpose ol'this meeting will be to assure a complete, understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. t ' s Slarlden Engineering 1`61-uary 6. 2003 -8- Project No. 5 1 I ;U01 U3-02-068 REFERENCES ASCE .lournal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, April 1974. 13oore, Joyner and i'umal (1994) Estimation ol'Re.sltonse ,Sjteetru uncl Peak ACCe1eratiOn.S fi•ani North AM&1ic:un Eurtlhquukes..U. S. Geological Survey, Open File Reports 94-127 and 93-509. Finn, W. E. Liam, (1996) Evuluution of Liquefaction Potential fur Different Earthquuke Ala gnimeles uncl ,S'i/e C'onclitionS, National Center For Earthquake Engineering Research Committee. Joyner and Boore, (1988) Measurements, Choracieri.:olion and Prediction of Strong Ground rl/otiorr, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Special Publication No. 20. Lee & AIba1sa (1974) " Eorthquuke Induced Settlements in Saturated Suncls". Seed and Idriss (1982) Groacncl tLlotioizs urtd Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research institute Monograph. Seed, Tokimatsu, Harder and Chung, (1985), h fluence of W Procedzu•es in Soil Liquefoction 1Zeslstonee Evoluotions, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 1 11, No. l?, December. Rogers, Thomas i-I., Geologic Map oFCalifornia, Santa Ana Map.Sheet Riverside County, 1984, Seistnic Element of the Riversicle C'oratlr General P1c117 Shulden Engineerin, APPENDIX :x FIELD EXPLORATION For our Held investivation, 10 exploratory borings were excavated on .January 3 and 10, 2003,'us1110 a truck nlOunted hollow stem auger rig (Mohile B-61) in the approximate locations indicated on the site plan InClUded In tills appendix. Continuous long of the materials enCountered %vere prepared on the silt by a representative of Sladden Engineering. Borim, loss are included in this appendix. Representative undisturbed samples were obtained within our boring -by driving a thin -walled steel penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) or a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler with a 140 pound hammer dropping approximately 30 inches (ASTM D 1586)..'rhe number of blows required to drive the samplers 18 inches was recorded (generally in 6 inch increments). Blowcounts are indicated on the boring log. The California samplers are 3.0 inches in diameter, carrying, brass sample rings having inner dianleters of ?.5 inches. The standard penetration samplers are 2.0 inches in diameter with an inner diameter of 1.5 .inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in Order to preserve the natural soil moisture content. ^Bulk sahiples were obtained? from the excavation spoils and samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing. f . t N � r N 1 Lj n �T Avenue 52 T. ::....... . G Figure I Vicinity Map Monroe Ranch Proposed 80-acre Residential Development North SWC Monroe Street & Avenue 52 Indio Area Riverside County, California No Scale Sladden Engineering Project Number: 544-3001 1 Date: 2-10-03 • j 0 1 1 Irs 17- v Approximate Boring Locations North No Scale _ PI Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1.-3-03 Borinv No. 1 Job No.: 5,14-3001 . o o DESCRIPTION a> r > Q 1 � a, U NII REkRKS a, > N 41 o _ M. U) U C U) u Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ` ML 3/3/6 90 • 26 --- 72% passing #200 ' 2/3/5 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 93 25 58% passing #200 with interbedded sandy silt layers 10 5/9/13 Sand: Brown, fine grained, SP 101 4 --- 7% passing #200 is 1/1/1 Silty Clay: Brown CL --- 39 • --- 9 1 % passing #200 20 4/5/5 Clayey Silt: Brown, ML 33 --- a 87 /� passing #200 slightly sandy 25 3/9/9 Sandy Silt: Brown, ML 29 64% passing #200 slightly clayey 4 30 3/4/5 " " ' " --- 25 62% passing #200 35 6/9/12 Silty Sand: Brown, SM --- 7 --- 16% passing #200 tine grained 40 14 -•- 1 7% passing #200 Groundwater 0) 43' ns 8/10/16 Sand: Brown, SP/SM --- 18 12% passing'#200 slightly silty, tine grained 5o Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM 7/t2/1G with interbedded clayeysilt layers "' 24 41`;% passing #200 _ - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 51.5' No Bedrock Note: The stratification lines ,;, Standard Penetration represent the approximate Sample - boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe.Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Dn't 1.-3-03 BorinvyNo. 2 + Job No.: 544-3001 4 y 5 (U o DESCRIPTION ; Q REMARhS CU o ° 0 >> U] o U W o C/) �D R 3/:i/; Silty Sand: Brown, SM �7 8 - fine grained 5/7/10 104 6 to _ 6/11/12 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 104 4 . 15 6/9/13 Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM 102 12 with interbedded clayey silt.lavers 20 2/3/4 Silty Clay: Brown. CL 58 35 ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater so 3.5 .IU .15 + 50 1 , 1 Note: The stratification lines 15 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil hypes; the transitions may be gradual. L Proposed 80 Acre Residefitial•Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 /.S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Mite: 1-10 03 Bonn No.3 Job No.: 544-3001 :-d C o DESCRIPTION Q > 2 REMAR.KS N. ^. o O ' +1 O r Q >, rn c� as 0 to a 3 0 r 0 Silty Sand: Brown, sNl , fine grained 5 2/4/6 Silty Sand: Brown, `SM 98 22 ; very silty, fine grained 10 5/10/15 Sand: Brown, SP/SM 99 G slightly silty, fine grained - 15 �/<1/� Clayey Silt: Brown, ML 8 30 e i with thin interbedded sand layers :'o Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/5/5 very silty, fine grained 91 9 --- - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater 30 35 •10 T ' i . 1 50 Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Mite: 1-10-03 Boring No.4 Job No.: 5114-3001 ,. DESCRIPTION Q REMARKS a e w o o 0. o Ca ;. rn 0m rn 3 c� o Silly Sand: Brown, SM fine grained 3/2/3 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy ML 95 28 ' 10 - 1/1/3 Silty Clay: Brown with thin - CL 87 36 --- interbedded silty sand layers -I5 3/5/i Silty Sand: Brown, SM very silty, fine grained 97 9 .20 2/4/6 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy ML 89 31 7 ® Recovered Sample Tonal Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater :30 :35 =10 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California .Date: 1-10-03 Boring No. 5 Job No.: 544-3001 ' cu a j . Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development k,.P.N. 767-20.0-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California .1-10-03 Boring No. 6 Job No.: 5-1=1-300.1 5 0 � o > DESCRIPTION Cz Q REMARKSCa ..y o o �2 E� U1 J m C/1 ¢ o 0 0 - Sand: Brown, SP/SM slightly silty, tine grained 5 - 4/7/11 103 G --- 3/G/11 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 94 7 --_ 15 G/9/8 Sand: Brown, SP/SM 95 8 :4/11/14 slightly silty, fine grained ., o 105 G ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater i 30 :15 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-604 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1 10 03 Bor`in Rio, 7 Job No.: 544-3001 5 a� DESCRIPTION � y" Q Cz RENLARI�S -0 . o � >•, o �,� o U1 U p e U1 U 11 Sand: Brown, SP/SM slightly silty, tine grained 5/8/10 103, 4 _ 4/7/11 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 98 f 4 3/6/7 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 87 9 with'thin clay layers 20 4/9/11 Sandy Silt: Brown, ML ' - verysandyJ9 19 Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.T No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater 30 :35 j 10 ,13 •30 Notc: The stratification lines 55 represent. the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. a Proposed 80 Acre Residential•Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 BorineyrNo.8 Job ..No.:544-3001 DESCRIPTION - Q 0 C in REMARKS o ° xo ca C> ai o W �D ^ o c> 0 Silty Sand: Brown,, SM very silty,•fine grained . 5 4/4/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL 88 34 5/10/15 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 104 5 5 2/5/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL . 82 38 . 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/9/9 fine grained 102 7 ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater 30 :15 '10 ,15 , Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767.-200-004 & -005. /.S.W.C. Monroe Street.& Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10703 oriiiLr No. 9 Job No.: 544-3001 o ro Co. DESCRIPTION Q ' o m � REMARKS Silty Sand: Brown, SM Y r very silty, fine grained 5 2/2/7 , 96 21 --- l0 2/213 Silty Clay_ Brown CL 79 42, _'� ' 15 2/3/3 81 • 41 ' ,20 2/6/6 - Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 87 25 - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25., ' No Groundwater 30 , 35 I 40 45 - r 450 Note: The stratification lines' 55 • represent the approximate ` boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. `Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe'Street & Avenue 52 / Indio,,California Date: 1 10 03 Borin Na:10 Job No.: 544-3001 • + O /1 > Y 3 DESCRIPTION '" C � REMARKS QU01 Silty Sand: Brown, SM fine grained b Palm tree roots encountered from 2 to 3' s 3/3/7 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy, ML 92 28 trace roots t0M 3/3/8 Silty Clay: Brown CI 91 32 with thin sand layers 3/4/8 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey - ML 113 25 :4/8/13 with interbedded sandy silt layers , 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM fine grained 96 7Y ; ®Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock , 25 No Groundwater :30 , 35 ,10 F 1 45 + 50 Note: The stratification lines ' 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. c APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field and returned to our laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing \'as generally performed in two phases. The first phase consisted of testing ill order to determine the compaction of the existing natural soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics,of the soil and to serve as a basis, for selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing. This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order to provide a means of developing specific, design recommendations based on the mechanical properties of the soil. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of the soil in its natural condition.' The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Log. Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-91, Test Method A. The results of this testing are presented graphically in this appendix. The maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing relative compaction to the soil. This is shown on the Boring Log, and is useful in estimating the strength and compressibility of the soil. 4 Classification Testing: Soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of mechanical grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits determinations. These provide information for developing classifications for the soil in accordance with the Unified Classification System. This classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The results of this testing are very useful in detecting variations in the soils and in selecting samples for further testing. SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING Direct Shear Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Direct Shear Testing. This testing measures the { Shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used in developing parameters for foundation design and lateral design. Testing was performed using recompacted test specimens, which were saturated prior to testing. Testing was performed using a* strain controlled test apparatus with normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot. Expansion Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. 'This testing consists of remolding 4-inch diameter by 1-inch thick test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50" percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear expansion is then measured until complete. Consolidation Testing: Four relatively undisturbed samples were selected For consolidation testing. For this testing one -inch thick test specimens are subjected to vertical loads varying from 575 psf to 11520 psf applied progressively. The consolidation at each load increment was recorded prior to placement of each subsequent load. The specimens were saturated at the 575 psf or 720 psf load increment. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture ASTM D698/D 1557 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Lab ID Number: ASTM D-1557 A Sample Location: B 1 @ 0-5' Rammer Type: Machine Description: Slightly Silty Sand Maximum Density: 110 pcf Optimum Moisture 13.5% I'z I� 13 13 U 12: C v C IN L Q 115 110 105 100 Sieve Size % Retained 3/4" 3/8" #4 0.0 Ill 15 Moisture Content, % 20 25 Max Density Sladden Engineering Revised 12/03/02 4 Direct Shear ASTM D 3080-90 ' (modified for unconsolidated, undrained conditions) Job Number 544-3001 + January 17, 2003 Job Name Monroe & Ave 52 Initial Dry Density: 96.8 pcf Lab ID Numbe + •' Initial Mosture Content: `14.0 % Sample ID Boring•1 @ 0-5' Peak Friction Angle (0): 27' Soil Descriptio Silty Sand Cohesion (c): 60 psF Sample Type Remolded @'90% of Maximum Density - t A Test Results 1 2 3 4 Average Moisture Content, % 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 `20.1 Saturation, % 73.2 73.2- 73.2` 73.2 73.2 Normal Stress, kips 0.151 1 0.301 0.60-3 1.206 ' Peak Stress, kips 0.153 1 0.207 0.342 A.675 • Peak Stress Linear (Peak Stress)f 1.2 1 I I y 1 v � I I I -'• cL 0.6 0.4 -- - --- --- — — - --- - 0.2 - - --I - -- ! — 0.0 ' 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0' 1.2 1.4 Normal Stress R , Direct Shear ' r Sladden Engineering Revised 12/03/02 • Gradation. ' ASTM C 117 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: Boring 1 @ 0-5 ' Sieve Sieve Percent ` Size, in •, Size, mm Passing: ' lot 25.4 .100 3/4'. 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 .100 #8 2.36 100 , #16 1.18 100 #30't 0.60 100 F #50 0.30 , 95 ' # 100 0.15 66 ' #200 0:074 ; 7 100 - 90 80 lie B'' • Sladden Engineering Revised i vzoioz • y Gradation ASTM C 117 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project.Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 3@10 Sieve . ` Sieve � Percent ` Size, in Size, mm . Passing 1 25.4 100 • 3/4" 19.1 100 ' 1/2" 12.7 100' 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 100 #8 2.36 r 100-1. #16 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 ` #50 0.30 •94 ` 4100 0.15 31 #200 0.014 7 100 90 80 f 70 60 .N a . 50 •40 30 20 10 0 ESE I Ir=111110 1=1111111 SE �Immm IIII In M 111==Illllnmmmllllll Hills 111111111111 III mmmmiiiillmmmiiiiilm iiiiiinmmiii flilll==Illlllmmmlll 1111 SEMI 11 in �I� OEM in liiiilmmiiiiilmmmiuim i lu�� in In H01110�iia low IN 11 INS11 �1= Ills m au 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm• Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised, l l /20/02 ♦ + - • A • ' Gradation ASTM C 117 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001; January 17; 2003 ' Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample 1D: 5@15 Sieve Sieve Percent - Size, -in Size, mm Passing 1 " 25.4 100 3/4" 19.1 100 1 /2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 A75. 100 #8 • 2.36 _ 100 #16, 1.18 - , 100 #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30 73 #100 0.15. 27 #200 0.074 7 90 80 70 awn 60 C 50 40 10, 20 10 •0 Gradation �iu i��i � u�► Ciii "ionNN in ii u iii■in n �MEN0 lims Ilion on ME Ul N NUNN ow Hill MI Nil 0 100.0 10.0 ' '1.00.1 '0.0 0.0: 1 • Sieve Size, mm Sladden Engineering 1 G Revised 11/20/02 -Gradation ' ASTM C 1 17 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Moriroe�& Ave 52 Sample 1D: 8@ 10 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in. Size, mm Passing - 25.4 100 < 3/4" . 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 • 3/8" 9.53 100 ' #4 4.75 100 #8 2.36 100 • #16 1.18 . 100 #30 0'60 • 100 #50 0.30 94 #100 0.1`5 39 #200 0.074 6 100 - 90 HIM mill -80 HIM H In Hill 70 ONE ME q 60 EM III HIM III ism CIS50 In a; 40 ME ME 30 2.0 1-0 MIMI - 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1' 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm nn. yam■ Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 a One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 January 17, 200' Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Initial Dry Density, pcf- 84.2 Sample ID: 1@2 Initial Moisture, %: 26 Soil Description: Silty Sand' Initial Void Ratio: 0.980 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram • -e-Before Saturation -A After Saturation I L -�-Rebound -IF- HydroConsolidation I 0 -1 -4°. • -5 -6 .. ,7 -s -9 -i0 o G � ME_ - 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Consordauion Sladden Engineering 'Revised 11/20/02 h One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Initialbry Density, pcf: 91.6 Sample ID: 1 @5 Initial Moisture, %: 25 Soil Description: Silty Sand Initial Void Ratio: 0.819 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram 1 0 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 9 -10 —� Before Saturation —A After Saturation - E- Rebound Hydro Consolidation y 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering • Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 6@5 Soil Description: Slightly Silty Sand -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf- 100.1 Initial Moisture, %: 6 Initial Void Ratio: 0.665 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram - 0 Before Saturation A After Saturation --e Rebound --f—Hydro Consolidation ■■■■■■ 0■■■■9■ .� ONE ■ ■ W ON e � OEM ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ .....-■■■-■■�■.■.....■■.....■■. ■■■■■.■■A■■■ ■ ■■ �B■■ ' .....■se ■■'�■■ a■iiiiii■"MENEM ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■ ■"■iiON ■■ i1■■■■■■ ■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■=■■■■a■■■■■■■■i■ i■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■N� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NN■. ■■■■■■ EWE ■■�■MEMO ■■■■■■■ �■■p■■■■H■ME me ■EMMMUM ' ■■:■ ii iii■�i■i ' ■ ■■■■ ■..■■■ "�mmmMEN A■ .a ■ ■ ■■�■■■■■■W ■ ■ ■ IMMOMMIM WE OEM g�■� 0 W ■ 0 C':: :'■::::: O:■C.aW .■ �■■ lime 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544=3001 January 17, 2003 .lob Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Initial Dry Density, pcf. 10 0. 2) Sample ID: 9@5 Initial Moisture, %: 21 Soil Description: Silty Sand Initial Void Ratio: 0.663 Specific Gravity: 2.67 I 0 -I -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -s -9 -10 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram —0 Before Saturation —A-After Saturation e Rebound Hydro Consolidation ■ ■ ■■■■ ■■ .■■■B ■■■■■■.�■■i■■■■■ ■.■ ■■ e— ■■■■■■■ ■■■MMMM ON ■.■■■■■■■■.■■■..E'e■ IMIMM■■ E■■■EH■■■■■■■■■■■ .■■■■ B■■..■�E9■■■■ ■■■om ■■■■■ MMUMMM.■..■.. ...■■ .■■ ■■x......■E �■ ■.�■�■..■■�.■.■. . ■ ...■.■..........■ ■■■E■......■■.■Ex...EE' ..■..■MMMMMM .NO MM■9.■■CE o■. ■■■■ ON ■NN■■■■■■■■■■■■■6■■0■■.■■■■■■■■ E■■■■■■ 'EE01 MEMNON EEEE: ■■■. ■ MEMEMMEMMOMM E ' Mx EMEE.. E .■-:: .■■ OM■■■ ME NNE No E'E EE ;■■■i■N ■■■■.ON 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0' 3.5 4.0 4.5 ' 5.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Reviscd 11/20/02 Wt of Soil + Ring: 540.0 Weight of Ring: 179.0 Wt of Wet Soil: 361.0 Percent Moisture: F 14% Wet Density, Pcf: 109.4 Dry Denstiy, pcf: 96.0 Saturation: 50.0 ANAHEIM TEST LABORATORY 3008 S. ORANGE AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707 PHONE (714) 549-7267 TO: SLADDEN ENGINEERING: 6782 STANTON AVE. SUITE E BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 ATTN: BRETT/DAVE PROJECT: #544-3001 DATE: 1/ 1 5/ 0 3 P.O. No.Chain of Custody Shipper No. Lob. No. A-2575 Specification: Material: SOIL MONROE & AVE..52 B1 @ 0-5' ANALYTICAL REPORT CORROSION SERIES L SUMMARY OF DATA pH SOLUBLE SULFATES SOLUBLE CHLORIDES MIN. RESISTIVITY per.Ca. 417 per Ca. 422 per Ca. 643 ppm ppm ohm -cm 8.0 100 131 2,059 FORM A2 APPENDIX C 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria I cbruary 6,_2003 -14- Project No., 544-3001 03-0?-068 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN INFORMATION The International Conference of Building Officials 1997 Uniform Building Code contains substantial revisions and additions to the earthquake engineering section in Chapter 16. Concepts contained in the code that will be relevant to construction of the proposed structures are summarized below. . Ground shaking is expected to be the primary hazard most likely to affect the site, based upon proximity to. significant faults capable of generating large earthquakes. Major fault zones considered to be most likely to create strong ground shaking at the site are listed below. Approximate Distance Fault Type Fault Zone From Site 1997 UBC San Andreas 8.9 km A San Jacinto' 32.7,km - �� a Based on our field observations and understanding of local geologic. conditions, the, soil profile type judged applicable to this site SD, generally described as stiff o- dense soil. The. site is located within UBC Seismic Zone 4. The following table presents additional coefficients and factors relevant to seismic mitigation for new construction upon adoption of the`1997 code. Seismic Source - Near -Source Acceleration Factor, Na Near -Source Velocity Factor, N,, Seismic . Coefficient Ca Seismic Coefficient , C„ San Andreas 1.04 1.28 0.44Na 0.64N,; San Jacinto 1.0- 1.0 ' 0.44Na 0.64N,. * * _ * E Q F •A U L T * Version 3-00 • DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS JOB NUMBER: 544-3h001 •, DATE: 01-17-2003 + ' JOB NAME: SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe. -Street :r Indio Area Riverside County, California CALCULATION NAME.:,Test Run Analysis FAULT -DATA -FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT ' SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE:' 33.6689 _ SITE LONGITUDE: 116.2383 .SEARCH RADIUS: .100 mi. ATTENUATION RELATION: 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. = SOIL•(310) «; UNCERTAINTY (M=Median,.S=Sigma): M' Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cd_2drp , SCOND: 0 A Basement Depth: 5.00 km Campbell•SSR: Campbell SHR:- COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT -DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.*DATi MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 0.0 r e • f � EQFAULT SUMMARY --------------- ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC ---------------------- SITE PARAMETERS Page 1 ----------------------- (ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE ------------------------------- ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE. I MAXIMUM I PEAK JEST. SITE FAULT NAME I mi (km) (EARTHQUAKE( SITE (INTENSITY I MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL: g JMOD.MERC. SAN ANDREAS - Coachella I 5.5( - 8.9)I 7.1 I 0.366 I. IX SAN ANDREAS - Southern ) 5.5( 8:9)I 7.4 I 0.429 I X SAN JACINTO-ANZA I 20.3(. 32.7)I 7.2 I 0.158 I VIII BURNT MTN. I 20:7( _33.3)I 6.4 I 0.102 I VII SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK L 21.3( 34.3)1 6.8 I 0.123• i VII -EUREKA PEAK I *21.4( 34.4)I 6.4 I 0.100 I VII• SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino I 22.3( 35.9)I 7*3 I 0.155 I VIII SAN JACINTO - BORREGO I 32.5( 52.3)I 6.6 I 0.080 I VII PINTO MOUNTAIN I 33.1( 53.2)I 7.0 •I 0.098 I VII EMERSON.So. - COPPER MTN.' ' 33.9( 54.5)I •6.9 0.091 I VII PISGAH-BULLION MTN.-MESQUITE LK I 35.0( 56:4)I 7.1 I 0.099 I VII LANDERS I 35.7(, 57.4)I 7.3 I 0.108 i VII BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE I 37.8( 60:8)1 6.4 I 0.064 I VI EARTHQUAKE VALLEY I 39.0( 62.8)I 6.5 I 0.066 I VI SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY I 39.3( 63.3)I 6.9 I 0.081 I VII NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) I 40.8( 65.7)I 6.7 I 0.086 I VII ELSINORE-JULIAN I 43.0( 69.2)I 7.1 I 0.0.84 I VII ELMORE RANCH:, I 45.2( 72.7),I 6.6 I 0.062 i VI JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) 46,.4( 74.7)I 6.7 i 0.064 1 VI CALICO - HIDALGO . 7.1. 0.078 I VII ELSINORE-TEMECULA I 48.9( 78.7)I 6.8 I 0.065 I VI ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN I 49.2( 79.1)I 6.8 I 0.065 I VI SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) I 50.1( 80.7)I 6.6 I 0.057 I VI SUPERSTITION HILLS. (San Jacinto)( 50.8( 81.8)I ., 6.6 I 0.057 I VI LENWOOD,-LO.CKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGSI 52.5( 84.5)I 7.3. I 0.080 I VII NORTHFRONTALFAULT ZONE (West) ( 53.1( 85.4)I 7.0 I 0.083 VII HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT I 60.6( 97.5)I 7.1 i 0.065 I VI SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO I 62.3( 100.2)I 6.7 I 0.051 I VI ELSINORE-GLEN IVY' 63.8( 102.7)I 6.8 0.053 VI IMPERIAL i 64.9( 104.4)I 7.0 I 0.058 I VI LAGUNA SALADA 68.4( 110.0)I 7.0 I 0.056 I VI CLEGHORN I 69.9( 112.5)I 6.5 I 0.042 I VI ROSE CANYON I 76.9( 123.7)I 6.9 I 0.048 I VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore). I 77.1( 124.1)I 6.9 I 0.048 I VI CHINO -CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) I 77.2( 124.3)I 6.7 0.053 VI CUCAMONGA I 77.4( 124.6)I 7.0 I 0.062 I VI WHITTIER ) 81.5( 131.1)1 6.8 I 0.044 VI SAN ANDREAS - Mojave 1 86.5( 139.2)I_ 7.1 0.049 I VI SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture 1 86.5( 139.2),I 7.8 I 0.071 I VI SAN JOSE 1 89.0( 143.2)I 6.5 0.043 I VI ------------------------------ DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ----------------------------- Page 2 ------------------------------------------- ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE --------- - ---------- ABBREVIATED DISTANCE MAXIMUM I PEAK . __ JEST SITE FAULT NAME mi (km) JEARTHQUAKE1 SITE JINTENSITY MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. g JMOD.MERC. CORONADO BANK 91.8( 147.7)1 7.4 I 0.055 1 VI SIERRA MADRE 91.8( 147.8)I 7.0 I 0.054 1 VI GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE I 91'.9( 147.9)I 6.9 I 0.042 1 VI ELYSIAN PARK THRUST 93.8( 151.0)I 6.7 0.045' 1 VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) 1 97.1( 156.2)1 6.9 0.040 ******************************************************************************* 1 V -END OF SEARCH- 45 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE SAN ANDREAS. - Coachella FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.5 MILES (8.9 km) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM -EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 6.4290 g CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP SWC Avenue 52.& Monroe Street / [ndio Area .001 1 10 100 Distance sadist] (km) 0 BLIND -THRUST FAULTS S)..Boore et al: (1997)'Horiz. - SOIL (310) M=5 M=6 M=7 M=8 f 1 o sera l LC. 240904 (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: ESTATES AT RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLANS 3533 SQUARE, FEET @ 3 WATTS=10,599WATTS REMAINDER OF 1ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% - 599 X 40°/.= 239.6 WATTS . 1ST 10,000 WATTS+REMAINDER 239:6 WATTS=10,239.6W 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS . 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS ' GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS' GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS .2 AC UNITS 8000 WATTS 2 FAU UNITS 1000 WATTS. FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 36,439.6- WATTS DIVIDED. BY 240 VOLT=151.83AM.PS USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE CL 0 ; uj > ®cl) m CL� C� co o r• UC. 240904 (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN SX 3840 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS=11,520WATTS REMAINDER OF 1ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 152OX 400/67; 608WAI TS , 1ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 608 WATTS 10,608W ' 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS j COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 906 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE'DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIIZCUTTS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS ' GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS 11,000 WATTS 3 FAU UNITS 1500 WATTS FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS . TOTAL 40,308 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT =167.95AMPS ' USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AMP SUB PANEL Nz ff-, uC 240904 (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS ' PLAN 5Y 3840 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS = 11;520 WATTS REMAINDER OF 1 ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 1520 X 40%= 608WATTS 1ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 608WATTS=10,608W ` 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUrrS 4000 WATTS • LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT ♦ 1500 WATTS, DISHWASHER' 800 WATTS ; REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS . 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS s' GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS I L000 WATTS 3 FAU UNITS 1500 WATTS FU nME LOAD 4000 WATTS , TOTAL 40,308 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT =I67.95AMPS USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AND SUB PANEL . R • r • t MO NZIE • (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA - BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLANSC 4101 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS = 12,303 WATTS, REMAINDER OF I ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% , 2303 X 40%= 921 WATTS I ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 921 WATTS=10,921 W 2=SMALL, KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-•GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS .11,000 WATTS 3 FAU UNITS 1500 WATTS FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 40,621 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT-169.25AMPS - USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AMP SUB PANEL 4 a AmmCK NZ ELAW (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER- DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN SCAB 4107 SQUARE FEET ® 3 WATTS = 12,321 WATTS REMAINDER OF 1 ST 10,000 WATTS X 400% 2321X 40% 92SWATTS , I ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER .928 WATTS=10,928W i - 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 1, 2000 WATTS. COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS ` REFRIGERATOR • 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL ` 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIRCUIT'S TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS 11,000 WATTS ' 3 FAU UNITS 1 S00 WATTS FUTURE LOAD' 4000 WATTS TOTAL 40,628 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT.=169.28AMPS ` USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AMP SUB PANEL . j • y i - 1 i NZ E Ur- 2408N . (760) 360-0728 - PROJECT: ESTATES AT RANCHO SANTANA " BUILDER: DESERT ELITE. SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN6 3840 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS = I1,520WATTS REMAINDER OF 1 ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 1520 X 40% 608 WATTS ,4 I ST 10,000 WATTS+REMAINDER 608 WATTS = 10,608W 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS ' LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS - COOK TOP r 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR ' 1500 WATTS . ' GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CiRCUITS'TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER : 800 WATTS 2 AC UNITS 8000 WATTS 2 FAU UNITS 1000 WATTS • FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 36,808 WATTS D[ViDFD By 240 VOLT =I53.36AMPS USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE ; 4 • ° f a h MCK NZ f Euscr,F� uc, 240804 v - (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN 6C 4408 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS =13,224WATTS REMAINDER OF 1 ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 3224 X 400/.=1289 WATTS 1ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 1289 WATTS- 11,299W 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS ' - REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL .600 WAS 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS 11,000 WATTS . 3 FAU UNITS 1500 WATTS FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 41,004 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=170.85AMPS USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AMP SUB PANEL. • 1 P P 1 NCKINZ. LI0.240804 - (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS i = PLAN 6CAB 421.4 SQUARE FEET ® 3 WATTS-12,642WATTS REMAINDER OF 1ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 2642 X 400/o--.1056 WATTS IST 10,000 WATTS+REMAINDER 1056 WATTS 11,056W ' 2-SMALL, KTTCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP - 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT I500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS a y . -, _...... 2-0FI CIRCUITS TO BATHS • , , r •1500 WATTS ` GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 3 AC UNITS 11,000 WATTS 3 FAU UNITS 1500 WATTS ' FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS ► . TOTAL 40,756 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=169.81AMPS USE 400 AMP MAIN SERVICE WITH 125 AMP SUB PANtL - ti i r