The URL can be used to link to this page

Rancho Santana TR 31202 2001 Code Update. Building Address B1 &V0TU �l/ I'� N7)4f 1 A Desert Elite, Inc. (&4444" P.O. BOX 1504 l n 8-495 CALLE TAMPICO Jh UINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Address 78401 Hwy. 111 Suite IS City Zip Tel. '" La Quinta 92253 760 777-9920 Contractor James O. Herington Development, Inc. Address 40960 California Oaks Rd. #283 City Zip Tel. Nurrieta CA 92562 909 677-8415 State Lic. City & Classif. 753190 Class B Lic. # Designers ' Len Nobel Company ESI/FME PO Box 16606 949 559-4305 City Zip St S2345 Irvine CA 92623 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). 0 I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Profes- sions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or im- provement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). ❑ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy Not S d '3 7 d t; (12t; (1 pompany Rtat_64 1213nd ❑ Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less). I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT. If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation Provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Name 1 SIT Centennial Bank Lender's Address! 01 Reaq Plvd. ZE � i This is a building permit when proper y I e ou I. signed an va I a e a "sub ec to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. q I certify that I have read this application and state that the above inform [oon is rrect. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter the above -mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip oy- `05 7 01- s s s? oy-s-es-7 APPLICATION ONLY BUILDING: TYPE CONST. SF OCC. GFIR A.P. Number 767-200-004, 005 Legal Description Tract 31202 Project Description Rancho Santana �,Gon 4r f Sq. Ft.2130-2863 No.• Single No. Dw. 201 Size Stones g Units NeWXX Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Four (4) Floor Plans See Attached PI -AN 215 2So PL tV L 2-601 Z So 19e-Al-\l 3 OaV63 Z so Estimated Valuation PERMIT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. Infrastructure TOTAL REMARKS AMOU 0T Sb rav �nnlf, 1U'l �� w �i�►G� DEP��- - .r— ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Validated by: Date Permit WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT Validation: YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = FINANCE RECORDING REQUESTED BY Fidelity National Title Company WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DOCUMENT AND TAX STATEMENTS TO: Desert Elite, Inc. 78401 Highway 111, Suite G La Quinta, CA 92253 IQ V� A r� Escrow No: 034732D-704-FW V" TiHP Nn- 10 0"_Z41 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTORS) DECLARES) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS JQM, CITY TAX QM computed on full value of property conveyed, City of La Quinta, AND FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Desert Cheyenne, Inc., a California Corporation hereby GRANT(S) to Desert Elite, Inc., a California Corporation the following described real property in the City of La Quinta County of Riverside, State -of California: Legal description as per Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof Dated: J l 4 Desert Cheyen By: John R. Ped 1no STATE OF COUNT'VOF e } SS: i HOC a077W7Z0 l4 '98`eea -Fee :.33-: 80 Page I of 3 Recorded In Offlel-al'Reeords County -of 'Riverside Gary L. Orso Assammr, Comity Clerk 3 -Re= de. R L -33 Public, personally app+red -� 19 n L (`,j,(i/),�(S personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to'be-the-person(s) whose-name(s)-is/a� subscribed to the within Instru d ackno g o methat he/she/they executed the -same in -his/ c cii)1�1 , nd PKby-Ii er/thei sign ure(s) on a instrument the person(s), or-the-entity-upon-behatf-of-whiLl] lire, wk I ;'. — W_dli MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced -herein, -Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared -to -issue, or -cause -to -be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance -describing -the land -and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which -maybe sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred -to as -an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the -printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms: The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Polides-areset forth in Exhibit A attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for -the purpose -of facilitating the issuance of a policy.of title insurance and no liability is assumed -hereby. If -it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The Policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions -and -exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and -exclusions -are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under -the -terms -of -the -title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written -representation -as -to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances -affecting -title to the land. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY aanunr BY SEAL ATTEST Pntl°^d CA Ll Builder Services 1300 Dove Street, Suite ##310 0 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 622-5000 0 FAX (949) 477-6835 PRELIMINARY REPORT ORDER NO.: 9791153 - B TITLE OFFICER: John M. Glance Amendment LOAN NO.: TO: Desert Elite Realty 78-401 Highway 111, Ste F Palm Desert, CA 92253 ATTN: John R. Pedalino YOUR REFERENCE.: TM 31202-1 SHORTTERM RATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 81751 Avenue 52, La Quinta, California EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 2004, 07:30A.M. The form of Policy or Policies of title insurance contemplated by this report -is: 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. OR'REFERRED`TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF'IS VESTED IN: DESERT CHEYENNE, INC., a California corporation 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS -FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "ONE' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART -HEREOF PW\krs 05/05/2004 L" t EXHIBIT "ONE" PROPOSED TRACT MAP 31202-1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF -THE -FOLLOWING: PARCEL 1: 1 THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE7- EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY -WATER DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDINGTOTHE-OMCIAL.PLAT THEREOF. PARCEL 2: THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 /4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP-6 SOUTH, "RANGE7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDINGTO-THE-OFFiCIAL'PLAT THEREOF. Assessor's Parcel No: 767-200-004-6 and 767-200-005-7 N AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONSTO COVERAGE -IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID -POLICY -FORM WOU.LD-BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including-any-assessmel, collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2004-2005: Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and -any -assessments cotlected-with taxes, for the fiscal year 2003-2004, Assessor's Parcel Number-767-200-004-6. Code Area Number: 058-004 1st Installment: $4,301.34 PAID 2nd Installment: $4,301.34 PAID Land: $816,674.00 Improvements: $0.00 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes -and -any -assessments -collected -with taxes, for the fiscal year 2003-2004, Assessors Parcel Number 767=200=0D5=7. Code Area Number: 058-004 1st Installment: $4,203.39 PAID 2nd Installment: $4,203.39 PAID Land: $798,077.00 Improvements: $0.00 3. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant -to -the -provisions of Chapter-3.5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of -the -State -of California. 4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not -disclosed by -the public -records. 5. Reservation contained in the Patent from the United States of. America, -as-follows: Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with -such water rights, as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws-and-decisiorn of the courts, and the reservation from the land hereby granted, a right -of, way -thereon -for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States. Recorded: February 21, 1917, Book 7, Page 226, of Patents 6. Rights of the public as to any portion of the land tying within -the area commonly known -as 30 feet along section lines, pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Supervisors -of -the County of Riverside, Dated: January 9, 1901 Recorded: April 17, 1959, Instrument No. 32692, of Official records 7. Intentionally deleted. 8. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and --any other obligations secured thereby Amount: $5,200,000.00 Dated: August 21, 2003 Trustor: Desert Cheyenne, Inc., a California Corporation Trustee: 1st Centennial Bank Beneficiary: 1st Centennial Bank Recorded: August 26, 2003, Instrument No. 2003-656576, of Official Records 9. Intentionally, deleted. END OF ITEMS Note 1. Section 12413.1, California Insurance Code became -effective January 1, 1990. This legislation deals with the disbursement of funds deposited with -any -title entity -acting -in an escrow or subescrow capacity. The taw requires -that all funds be -deposited -and collected by the title entity's escrow and/or, subescrow account -prior -to disbursenrent-of any funds. Some methods of funding may subject funds -to -a holding -period -which -must expire before any funds may be disbursed. In order -to avoid -any -such --delays, all fundings should be done through wire transfer, certified check or checks -drawn on California financial institutions. Note 2. The charge where an order is cancelled after the issuance of -the, report -of-title, wilt -be that amount which in the opinion of the Company is proper compensation -for -the -=services rendered or the purpose for which the report is used, burin no event shall:said-charge-be less than the minimum amount required under Section 12404.1 of -the Insurance Code -of the State of California. If the report cannot be cancelled "no -fee" pursuant'to-the provisions of said Insurance Code, then the minimum cancellation-fee--shall-be-that permitted by law. Note 3. California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18668, effective January 1, 1991, requires that the buyer in all sales of California Real Estate, wherein -the Seller shows -an -out -of State Address, withhold 3-1 /3% of the total sales price as California State Income Tax, subject to the various provisions of the law as therein contained. 4 1 i YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICES • Engineering •Architecture -Surveying- Building & Safety Services ' , Letter of Transmittal To: CITY OF LA QUINTA Date: 12/14/2004 Project: RANCHO SANTANA (SFDX3) Attn: ED RANDALL PC#; 04-5857(3 CHECK) Tel No.: (760) 777-7012 Tract No.: We are forwarding: X By Messenger By Mail Your Pickup No. of Copies Description: 1 TRUSS CALCS 1 REDLINED PLANS 1 SOILS REPORT 1 REVISED PLANS Comments: STRUCTURAL CONTENTS ARE APPROVABLE THANK YOU This Material Sent for: Your Files Your Review Checking Other By: NALIN PACHUNURI Phone # (760) 360-5770 EXT. 108 Per Your Request X Approval At the request of: 77-804 Wildcat Drive, Suite C, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 360-5770 Bronz Young 97 -qq LEGACY REPORT 9650A Reissued December 1, 2004 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Business/Regional Office ■ 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 ■ (562) 699-0543 Regional Office ■ 900 Montclair Road, Suite A, Birmingham, Alabama 35213 ■ (205) 599-9800 www.icc-es.org Regional Office ■ 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478 ■ (708) 799-2305 The Subcommittee on Evaluation has reviewed the data submitted for compliance with the Standard Building Code© and the International One and Two Family Dwelling Code and submits to the Building Official or other authority having jurisdiction the following report. The Subcommittee on Evaluation, ICC-ES and its staff are not responsible for any errors or omissions to anydocuments, calculations, drawings, specifications, tests or summaries prepared and submitted by the design professional or preparer of record that are listed in the Substantiating Data Section of this report. Portions of this report were previously included in Evaluation Reports #9650. REPORT NO.: 9650A EXPIRES: See the current EVALUATION REPORT INDEX CATEGORY: ROOF COVERINGS AND ROOF DECK CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTED BY: O'HAGIN'S, INC. 2661 GRAVENSTEIN HWY SOUTH SUITE 107 SEBASTOPOL, CALIFORNIA 95472 PRODUCT TRADE NAME O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tile (Aluminum, Galvanized Steel, or Copper) 2. SCOPE OF EVALUATION 2.1 Ventilation Openings 2.2 Roof Covering Fire Classification 3. USES O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles are installed on the slope of concrete or clay tile roofs to provide attic ventilation for wood framed roof construction. 4. DESCRIPTION 4.1 General O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles are manufactured from either 0.032 Aluminum, 26 Ga galvanized steel or 16 oz copper. The vent system consists of two vents - a Primary Vent sub flashing that is installed over openings cut in the roof deck and a Secondary Vent that is installed over the Primary Vent and takes the place of two field tiles. The Primary Vent is screened with galvanized #4 mesh wire insect screen. The Secondary Vent is painted to match the surrounding tiles. 4.2 Models and Net Free Area 4.2.1 Secondary Vents Model No.: 50046-S; Net Free Area = 97.50 sq. in. Model No.: 50044-M; Net Free Area = 86.25 sq. in. Model No.: 50043 Flat; Net Free Area = 98.75 sq. in. 4.2.2 Primary Vent: Primary Vent (Sub Flashing); Net Free Area = 118 sq. in. 5. INSTALLATION 5.1 General O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles are installed in accordance with the manufacturer's published installation instructions and this report. The number of O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles installed must provide the net free ventilation area required under Section 2309.7 of the Standard Building Code©. The manufacturer's published installation instructions and this report shall be strictly adhered to and a copy of these instructions shall be available at all times on the job site during installation. The instructions within this report govern if there are any conflicts between the manufacturer's instructions and this report. 5.2 Roof Covering Fire Classification O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tile Systems are installed with concrete or clay tile roofs classified as Class A Roof Coverings. 5.3 Fastening 5.3.1 Minimum 1/2 inch thick plywood sheathing roof decking: The Primary Vent is installed on '/2 inch thick solid plywood.roof decking using roofing cement and 1-1/2 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank corrosion resistant roofing nails spaced 4 inches on center around perimeter. The Secondary Vents are installed over the Primary Vents as follows: Models 5 0044-M and 50046S: Installed using two 1-1/2 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank corrosion resistant roofing nails at the top of the vent and an O'Hagin Wind Clip installed at the bottom of the vent. The Wind Clip hooks ICC-ES legacy reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed, nor are they to be construed as an endorsement of the subject ofthe report or a reconunendation jar its use. There is no warranty by ]CC Evaluation Service, Inc., express or implied, as to anyfinding or other mutter in this report, or as to any product covered by the report Copyright © 2004 Page 1 of 2 9650A PAGE 2 OF 2 under the preceding course tile and is adjustable for head lap. 7. CODE REFERENCES Model 50043 Flat: Installed using two 1-1/2 inch by 3/8 inch Standard Building Code©-1999 Edition diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank corrosion resistant roofing nails at the top of the vent and an O'HAGIN Wind Clip Section 103.7 Alternate Materials and Methods installed at the bottom of the vent. The Wind Clip hooks under Chapter 15 Roof Assemblies and Rooftop the preceding course tile and is adjustable for head lap. Structures Section 1503 Weather Protection 5.3.2 Minimum 5/8 inch thick plywood sheathing roof Section 1504 Performance Requirements decking: The Primary Vent is installed on 5/8 inch thick solid Section 1505 Fire Classification plywood roof decking using 12 -1 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head Section 1506 Materials by 1/8 inch diameter shank electro galvanized roofing nails Section 1507 Roof Coverings with Slopes 2:12 or spaced 5-1/2 inches on center along the long side of the vent and Greater 4-'Y2 inches along the short side of the vent. The Secondary Section 1508 Roof Coverings With Slopes Less Than Vents are installed over the Primary Vents as follows: 2:12 Section 2309.7 Ventilation of Attic Space Models 50046-S: Installed using two (2) 1 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank electro galvanized roofing nails at the top of the vent and two (2) O'Hagin Wind Clip installed at the bottom of the vent. The Wind Clip hooks under the preceding course tile and is adjustable for head lap. Models 50044-M: Installed using four (4) 1 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank electro galvanized roofing nails at the top of the vent and one (1) O'Hagin Wind Clip installed at the bottom of the vent. The Wind Clip hooks under the preceding course tile and is adjustable for head lap. Model 50043 Flat: Installed using five (5) 1 inch by 3/8 inch diameter head by 1/8 inch diameter shank electro galvanized roofing nails at the top of the vent and an O'HAGIN Wind Clip installed at the bottom of the vent. The Wind Clip hooks under the preceding course tile and is adjustable for head lap. 5.4 Wind Uplift Wind uplift resistance is outside the scope of this evaluation report. The wind uplift shall be limited to the uplift capacity of the concrete and clay tile roof assemblies that the O'Hagin vents are installed with. Documentation shall be submitted substantiating the wind uplift capacity of the O'Hagin vents with the concrete and clay roof tiles specified for the building under construction. The documentation shall be submitted to the building official when applying for a permit. 6. SUBSTANTIATING DATA 6.1 Manufacturer's descriptive literature, specifications, engineering drawings, installation instructions, and material mill order certificates. 6.2 Net area calculations for vents used with concrete tile roofs, Columbia Research & Testing, March 20, 1995, signed and sealed by Thomas M. Mannatt, R.C.E. 6.3 Test report on fastenings for wind uplift resistance under ASTM E 330, RADCO, Test Report RAD-1714, Project C-6065, Lab TL-1272, May 1996, signed by Sanjay "Jay" Mishra and Michael L. Zieman, P.E. 6.4 Test report on fastenings for wind uplift under ASTM E 330, National Certified Testing Laboratories, Report No. NCTL-210-2078-1,2,3, 09-30-98, signed by Michael E. Lane, signed and sealed by Barry D. Portnoy, P.E.. International One and Two Family Dwelling Code - 1998 Edition Section 108 Alternate Materials and Systems Section 806 Roof Ventilation Chapter 9 Roof Coverings Section 906 Tile, Clay or Concrete Shingles 8. COMMITTEE FINDINGS The Subcommittee on Evaluation in review of the data submitted finds that, in their opinion, the O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles as described in this report conform with or are suitable alternates to that specified in the Standard Building Code© and the Inter- national One and Two Family Dwelling Code or Supplements thereto. 9. LIMITATIONS 9.1 This Legacy Evaluation Report and the installation instructions, when required by the building official, shall be submitted at the time of permit application. 9.2 The vents shall be used only on wood framed roofs for buildings of Type V and VI Construction. 9.3 The vents shall not be used in fire resistance rated roof ceiling assemblies unless test reports from an approved testing laboratory are submitted to the building official. 9.4 The number of vents installed must provide the net free ventilation area required under Section 2309.7 of the Standard Building Code© or Section 806 of the International One and Two Family Dwelling Code. 9.5 The vents were not evaluated forwind uplift pressure see Section 5.4 above. 10. . IDENTIFICATION Each package of O'Hagin Cloaked Vent Tiles covered by this report shall be labeled with the manufacturer's name and/or trademark, the SBCCI Public Safety Testing and Evaluation Services Inc.. Seal or initials (SBCCI PST & ESI), and the number of this report for field identification. 11. . PERIOD OF ISSUANCE SEE THE CURRENT EVALUATION REPORT INDEX FOR STATUS OF THIS LEGACY EVALUATION REPORT. For information on this report contact: Michael P. O'Reardon, P.E. 205/599-9800 r GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED 80 ACRE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MONROE RANCH SWC MONROE STREET AND AVENUE. 52 `LA QU.INTA, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LA QU1N UILDING & SAF TA APPROVED DEPT. FOR CO ST UC .ION DAT BY -Prepared B,,-- Sladden Engineering 39-725 Garand Lane. Suite G Palm Desert. California 9221 1 (760)772-3893 Sladden Engineering 6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369 39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895 February 6, 2003 Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 Desert Elite, Inc. 78-401 Highway I 11, Suite G La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mr. John Pedalino Subject: Geotechnical Investigation Project: Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development Monroe Ranch — APN 767-200-004 and 005 SWC Monroe Street and Avenue 52 y La Quinta, California Presented herewith is the report of our Geotechnical Investivation at the site of -the proposed approximately 80 acre residential subdivision located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta. California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in foundation design for the proposed single-family residences and the related site improvements. This report presents the results of our field investigation and laboratory testing along with conclusions and recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. This report completes our original scope of services as understood. We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this -project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the Undersigned Respectfully submitted, SLAD^DE/\N ENGINEERING Brett L. Ander n Principal Engineer SER/pc Copies: 6/Deser1 Elite, Inc. f l GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED 80 ACRE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MONROE RANCH SWC MONROE STREET AND AVENUE 52 LA QUINTA. CALIFORNIA 1=cbruar% 6.2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................:......................... I SCOPEOF WORK..................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECTDESCRIPTION....:.................................................................................................... 1 GEOLOGYAND SEISMICITY................................................................................................. SUBSURFACECONDITIONS.................................................................................................. ? LIQUEFACTION........................................................................................................................ 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 ....................................................._................ FoundationDesign................................................................................................................ 4 Settlements............................................................................................................................ 4 LateralDesign ........................................ :.............._............................................................... 4 RetainingWalls..................................................................................................................... 5 ExpansiveSoils..................................................................................................................... 5 ConcreteSlabs-on-Grade..............:..:...........................................................:........................ 5 SolubleSulfates...................................................................................................:................ Tentative Pavement Design......:.......::..............................:................................................... Shrinkage and Subsidence .............. 6 GeneralSite GradinLl........................... ................................................................................... 6 I. Site Clearino ..............................................:................................................................ 6 '. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas.......................................................... 6 3. Placement of Compacted Fill..............................................................................:....... 6 4. Preparation of Slab and Pavement A'reas..:................................................................ 6 5. Testing and Inspection................................................................................................ 7 GENERAL.......................................................................................:.......................................... 7 REFERENCES...................................................:...:......................:.....:.....................................:.. APPENDIX A - Site Plan and Borins Logs Field Exploration APPENDIX B - Laboratory Testing, Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX C - 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria 0 February 6. 2003 -1- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of' our Geotechnical Investigation performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in the design and construction of the foundations for the proposed residential structures. The project site is located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of. La Quinta, California. The preliminary plans indicate that the proposed project will include single-family residences alon,J with various associated site improvements. Associated improvements will include paved roadways. concrete driveways. walkways and patios. underground utilities.. and landscape areas. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to determine certain engineering characteristics of the near surface soils on the site in order to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. Our investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing. literature review. engineering analysis and the preparation of this report. Evaluation of hazardous materials or other environmental concerns \vas not within the scope of services provided. Our investigation was performed in accordance with contemporary geotechnical engineering principles and practice. VVe make no other warranty, either express or implied. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site is located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta. California. It is our understanding that the project will consist of single-family residences along with various associated site improvements. It is our understanding that the proposed residences \villvbe of relatively lightwei�_>ht wood -frame construction and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs on grade. The associated improvements will include paved roadways, concrete walkways. patios. driveways, landscape areas -and various underground utilities. The majority of the subject site is presently vacant and the ground surface is covered with turf. The properties surrounding the site to the south are presently occupied by agricultural fields. Avenue 52 and Monroe Street are paved adjacent to the site and underground and overhead utilities exist along the streets. There are underground irrigation pipes along the edges of the site and traversing the site. Based upon our previous experience with lightweight residential structures.. we expect that isolated column loads will be less than 30 kips and wall loadin, will be less than to 2.0 kips per linear toot. Grading is expected to include minor cuts and fills to match the nearby elevations and to construct slightly elevated building pads to accommodate site drainage. This does not include removal and recompact ion of the bearing soils within the building areas. If the anticipated foundation loading or site grading varies substantially from that assumed the recommendations included in this report should be reevaluated. Slaelden Eii iirecriirq ' Fehruary 6, 2003 -?- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY The project site is located within the central Coachella Valley that is part of the broader Salton Trough seomorphic province. The Salton Trough is a northwest trending depression that extends from the Gulf of California to the Banning Pass. Structurally the Salton Trough is dominated by several northwest trendin' faults, most notable of which is the San Andreas system. A relatively thick sequence of sedimentary rocks have been deposited in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough from Miocene to present times. These sediments are predominately terrestrial in nature with some lacustrian and minor marine deposits. The mountains surrounding the Coachella Valley are composed primarily of Precambrian metamorphic and Mesozoic granitic rock. The Coachella Valley is situated in one of the more seismically active areas of California. The San Andreas fault zone is considered capable of generating a maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 8.0 and due to its proximity to the project site the distance of approximately 6.5 kilometers should be considered in design fault for the project. Seismic activity along the nearby faults continues to affect the area and the Coachella Valley is considered one of the more seismically active regions in California. A computer program and pertinent geologic literature were utilized to compile data related to earthquake fault zones in the region and previous seismic activity that may have affected the site. E.Q. Fault Version 3.00 (Blake) provides a compilation of data related to earthquake faults in the region. The program searches available databases and provides both distances to causitive faults and the corresponding accelerations that may be experienced on the site due to earthquake activity along these faults. The attenuation relationship utilized for this project was based upon Joyner R Boore (1987) attenuation curves. The information generated \\'as utilized in our liquefaction evaluation v The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State but is mapped in the County's Liquefaction and Ground Shaking Hazard Zone V. Several significant seismic events have occurred within the Coachella Valley during the past 50 years. The events include Desert Hot Springs - 1948 (6.5 Magnitude), Palm Springs = 1986 (5.9 Magnitude). Desert Hot Springs - 1992 (6.1 Magnitude), Landers - 1992 (7.5 Magnitude) and Big Bear - 1992 (6.6 Magnitude). SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils underlying the site consist primarily of silty sands, sandy silts and clayey silts. As is typical for the area. the silty sand and sandy silt layers are interbedded and vary in thickness. Silty sands were the most prominent soils within our exploratory borings but several prominent clayey silt and silty clay layers were also encountered. The sandy silts and silty sands encountered near the existing ground surface appeared somewhat loose but the deeper soils appeared relatively firm. Sampler penetration resistance (as measured by field blowcounts) indicate that density generally increases with depth. Relatively undisturbed samples indicated dry density varying from 79 to 113 pcf. The site soils were dry near the surface but \vet below a depth of 5 or 10 feet. Measured moisture content varied from 4 to 42 percent. Laboratory testing indicates that the surface soils within the upper 5 feet consist primarily of an inconsistent mixture of silty sands and sandy silts. Expansion testing indicates an expansion index of 0 For the surface silty sands that are classified as "very low" expansion category soils in accordance with Table 18-1-B of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Slrrdrlen Eirgitteeriii Februa:\6. 1-003 -3- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface within boring 1. The presence of groundwater should not impact site grading or construction. LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction occurs with sudden loss of soil strength due to rapid increases in pore pressures within cohesionless soils as a result of repeated cyclic loading during seismic events. Several conditions. must be present for liquefaction to occur including; the presence of relatively shallow groundwater, generally loose soils conditions, the susceptibility of soils to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics and the generation of significant and repeated seismically induced ground accelerations. Liquefaction affects primarily loose, uniform grained cohesionless sands with low relative densities. In the case of this project site, several of the factors required for liquefaction to occur are present. As previously indicated. groundwater \vas encountered at a depth of approximately 4.3 feet below the existirlE ground surface on the site. Several relatively uniform grained sand and silty sand layers were encountered within our borings. The site is located near an active fault system. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface. Due to the depth to groundwater, the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is limited. Althoul;h several silty sand layers appear susceptible to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics, the lack of groundwater within the upper 40 feet should minimize liquefaction potential CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our Field investigation and laboratory testing. it is our opinion that the proposed residential development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in building foundation design and site preparation. Due to the somewhat loose condition of the surface soils and the potential for delineated settlements, remedial grading is recommended for the building areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and reconlpaction of the primary foundation bearing soils. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site Grading section of this report. Based upon the depth to groundwater, it is*our opinion that the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is negligible. The remedial grading recommended for building. areas will result in the construction of a uniform compacted soil mat beneath all fOotlllgs. ' In our opinion, liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the site grading and foundation design recommendations included in this report should not be necessary. The site is located in one of the more seismically active areas in California. Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of the structure should be acknowledged. The accelerations that may be experienced on the site (as previously discussed) should be considered in design. The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minlillUrn design criteria. Pertinent 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria is summarized in Appendix C. Sladderr Engirleering February 6. 2003 -4- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 Caving did occur within our boring and the potential for caving should be expected within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSIAA excavation criteria. On the basis of our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the near surface sandy silts and silty sands will be classified by CalOS1-1A as Type C. Soil conditions should be verified in the field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The near surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to be lion -expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 0 for the surface silty sands that corresponds with the `very low" expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-1-B. The following recommendations present more detailed design criteria that have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation. The recommendations are based upon non -expansive soils criteria. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings that are supported upon properly compacted soils, may be expected to provide adequate support for the proposed structure foundations. Building pad grading should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and firm bearing conditions for the structure foundations. Footings should extend at least 12 inches beneath lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings should be at least 2 feet square and continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Continuous footings may be des]L�ned using an allowable bearin'- value of 1500 Pounds per square foot (psf) and isolated pad footings may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 1800 psf. The allowable bearing pressures are applicable to dead and frequently applied live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by 1/3 to resist wind and seismic loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soils are not allowed to become saturated from the ponding of rainwater or irrigation. Drainage from the building area should be rapid and complete. The recommendations provided in the preceding paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings will be supported upon properly compacted engineered fill soils. All grading should be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soils Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be approximately one inch when using the recommended bearing values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 between soil and concrete may be used with consideration to dead load forces only. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings that are poured against properly compacted native or approved non -expansive import soils. Passive earth pressure should be ignored \within the upper 1 foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Sladr/en En ineerin�; February 6, 2003 -5- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 Retaining Walls: Retaining walls may be necessary to accomplish the proposed construction. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 40 pcf for level free -draining native backfill conditions. For walls that are to be restrained at the top. the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 60 pcf for level free - draining native backfill conditions. Backdrains should be provided for the full height of the \vaI Is. Expansive Soils: Due to the prominence of "very low" expansion category soils near the surface, the expansion potential of the foundation bearing soils should not be a controlling factor in foundation or floor slab design. Expansion potential should be reevaluated subsequent to grad i n g. Concrete Slabs -on -Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted non -expansive fill thickness of 24 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor slab is not desired; we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break. Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaining uniform concrete curing. Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures should not be necessary. However, reinforcement will have a beneficial effect in containing cracking due to concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs -on -grade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soils were determined to be 100 parts per million (ppm), which is generally considered non corrosive with respect to concrete. The use of Type V cement and specialized sulfate resistant concrete mix designs should not be necessary. Tentative Pavement Design: All paving should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base). This may be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. R-Value testing was not conducted during our investigation but based upon the silt}, nature of the surface soils, an R-Value of approximately 50 appears appropriate for preliminary pavement design for onsite road,.vays. The following preliminary pavement section is based upon a design R-Value of 50. Parking areas and areas limited to auto and light truck traffic (Traffic Index = 5.0) Use 3.0 inches of asphalt on 4.0 inches of Class 2 base material Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard Specifications. January 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations during placement. ` Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of site grading when the subgrade soils are in -place.. This will include sampling and testing of the actual subgrade soils and an analysis based upon the specific traffic information Sla(ldett Enr ineeritt, February 6, 2003 -6- Project No. 544-3001 0 3-02-068 Shrinkage and Subsidence: VoILlmetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage could vary from 15 to 20 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted should he between 0.1 and 0.3 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used. the moisture content of *the soil at the time of �,rading and, the actual degree of compaction attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses that will occur due to the stripping of the organic material from the site and the removal of oversize material. General Site Grading: All grading should be performed in accordance with the gradin<, ordinance of the City of La Quinta, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory testing and are intended to provide a uniform compacted mat of soil beneath the building slabs and foundations. L Site Clearing: Proper site clearing will be very important. Any existing vegetation, slabs, foundations, abandoned underground utilities or irrigation lines should be removed from the proposed building areas and the resulting excavations should be properly backfilled. Soils that are disturbed during site clearing should be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soils Engineer. 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: In order to provide adequate and uniform bearing conditions. we recommend overexcavation throunhout the proposed building areas. The building areas should be overexcavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below existing grade or 2 feet below the bottom of the footings. whichever is deeper. The exposed soils Should then be scarified to a depth of I foot. moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The excavated material may then be replaced as engineered fill material as recommended below. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Within the building pad areas. till materials should be spread in thin lifts. and compacted at near optimum moisture content to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported fill material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor shall notify the Soils Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of importing soils in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site that complies with the project specifications. .Approval by the Soils Engineer will be based upon material delivered to the site and not the preliminary evaluation of import sources. Our observations of the materials encountered during our investigation indicate that compaction within the native soils will be most readily obtained by means of heavy rubber tired equipment and/or sheepsfoot compactors. A uniform and near optimum moisture content should be maintained during fill placement and compaction. 4. Preparation of Slab and Paving Areas: All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving or exterior concrete slabs -on -grade, should be underlain by a mininuiin compacted fill thickness of 12 inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation. scarification and recompaction of the surface.. and replacement of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. Compaction of the slab and pavement,areas should be to a minimum ot�90 percent relative compaction. Sla(Men Engineering February 6. 2003 -7- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 S. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations should be performed by the Soils Engineer or his representative. in order to verify that the aradinu is being_ performed in accordance with the project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable ASTM test standards. The nlininlum acceptable degree of compaction shall be 90 percent of the maxinlunl dry density as obtained by the ASTM D1557-91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density; additional compactioe effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. GENERAL The findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building area. Should conditions encountered during grading appear- different than those indicated in this report. this office should be notified. This report is considered to be applicable for use by Desert Elite; Inc., Inc. for the specific site and project described herein. The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report, are contingent upon 1110111torma of the grading operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our reyie\\ of the grading operations and additional testing, if indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing. this office should be notified prior to such testing_ in order to coordinate any required site visits bV our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladdenbi,gineerina. We recommend that a pre -job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site__Trading. The purpose of this meeting \gill be to assure a complete understandim,- of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. Slmlden Enaineerim February 6. 2003 -8- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 REFERENCES ASCE Journal of Ge6technical Engineering Division. April 1974. Boore. Joyner and Fumal (1994) Esvinnnio17 of Response SI)eclro unJ Peuk Aecelerution.v f of 1 Forth American E(lrthyuokes, U. S. Geological Survey, Open File Reports 94-1 27 and 93-509:: Finn, W. E. Liam, (1996) EVuluatiun of Licjuefuction Polenlicll for Differe» 1 Earthquuke Mugnilucles and Sile C017diti017S, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Committee. Joyner and Boore, (1988) Measul-e171en1s, Characlerization a17d Preclict1017 Of S1r017g Grouncl /V1011on, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering; Special Publication No. 20. Lee & Albaisa (1974) ` Earthyuuke Induced Seule177eimv in Saturated Sands". Seed and Idriss (1.982) Ground 1Volia17.c and Soil Liquefilclion Duril7g Eulvhyuakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph. Seed; Tokimatsu, Harder and Chung, (1985). Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations, ASCE Journal ofGeotechnical Engineering. Volume 1 I I; No. 12, December. Rogers.. Thomas H.. Geologic Map of California, Santa Ana Map Sheet. Riverside County, 1984, Seisn7ic .S'cJetr Element of the Riversicle COMM: General /'lrn7 Slculden Enr ineerit7;; APPENDIX A Site Plan Boris Logs r APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION For our field investivation. 10 exploratory borings were excavated on January 3 and 10, 2003, using a truck mounted hollow stem auger ri`; (Mobile $-61) in the approximate locations indicated on the site plan included in this appendix. Continuous log of the materials encountered were prepared on the site by a representative of Sladden Engineerinu. Bonn`, loss are included in this appendix. Representative undisturbed samples were obtained within our boring by driving a thin -walled steel penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) or a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler with a 140 pound hammer dropping approximately 30 inches (ASTM D1586). The number of blows required to drive the samplers 18 inches was recorded (generally iti 6 inch increments). Blowcounts are indicated on the borin- log. The California samplers are 3.0 inches in diameter; carrying brass sample rings having inner diameters of 2.5 inches. The standard penetration samplers are 2.0 inches in diameter with an inner diameter of 1.5 inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in order to preserve the natural soil moisture content. Bulk samples were obtained from the excavation spoils and samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing: • rn m .: a Z J L . _� Avenue 52 SfTE l f E V � . 1 � ! f 1i ( �• � f North No Scale r I m, Oil "I TAA 3 . - O � I O j6 i5 = C r 10 i;6-3 G4 North No Scale e'- Approximate Boring Locations O APPENDIX B " Laboratory Testing Laboratory Test Results Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe.Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Boring No. 10 Job No.: 544-3001 y J DESCRIPTION o ._ M � RENII�RKS 70 p V C t_i o Silty Sand: Brown, S1v fine grained Palm tree roots encountered from 2 to 3' 3/3/7 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy, ML 92 23 trace roots 10 3/3/8 Silty Clay: Brown CL 91 3- 2 with thin sand layers 15 3/4/8 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 113 25 --- - with interbedded sandy silt layers 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SN/I ' 4/8/13 fine grained �f ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock No Groundwater 2..5 :30 35 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-3-03 orina No. 1 Job No.: 544-3001 U O o DESCRIPTION U) a REl /LARKS 0 � U] � U O Sandy Silt: Brown. clayey ML 3/3/6 90 20 72% passing #200 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 93 25 --- 58%passing #200 5 2/3/5 with interbedded sandy silt layers 10 - _ 5/9/13 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 101 4 -- ° 2 7 /° passing #_00 15 111/1 Silty Clay: Brown CL --- 39 --- 91 % passing #200 20 4/5/5 Clayey Silt: Brown, ML •-- 33 --- ° 87 /o passing #200 _ slightly sandy 75 I3/9/9 Sand) Silt: Brown, ( ML .-. 29 --- 64°io passing #200 i slightly clayey 30 3/4/5 " " " 25 --- 62% passing 9200 35 G/9/12 Silty Sand: Brown, SNI ; 16%passing #200 fine grained 40 5/10/16 --- 14 --- 17% passing #200 Groundwater (543' 45 - 8110/1G Sand: Brown, SP/SM 18 --- 12% passing #200 slightly silty, fine grained c0 i I Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM - 7/12/16 with interbedded clayey silt layers 24 -__ 41 % passing #200 p g Total Depth = 51.5' - - Recovered Sample Note: The stratification lines No Bedrock 55 I Standard Penetration represent. the approximate boundaries between the soil types; Sample the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-3-03 oring No. 2 Job No.: 544-3001 > o o `- DESCRIPTION a M � REMARKS �" -. o o U 0 Silty Sand: Brown, SM �� 8 3�'�a fine grained 0 517110 104 6 --- Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Borin No. 3 Job No.: 544-3001 y DESCRIPTION a r r REMARKS _� V N ^ a rn U M co S o U 0 Silty Sand: Brown, S-NI fine grained 2l4/G Silty Sand: Brown, SM . JS 22 - very silty, fine grained Sand: Brown, SP/SM 99 G 10 5/10/15 slightly silty, fine grained 15 -9�4�7 Clayey Silt: Brown; ML 87 30 ••- with thin interbedded sand layers 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4�5�5 very silty, fine grained 91 9 Total Depth = 21.5' - Recovered Sample No Bedrock No Groundwater 25 30 35 40 I 45 50 j Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 BorinEr No. 4 Job No.: 544-3001 3 � y DESCRIPTION ° > .o.. REMARKS ., G V ° Silty Sand: Brown, SM fine <_rrained 5 3/2/3 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy ML 95 28 --- 1° 1/1/3 Silty Clay: Brown with thin CL g; '36 interbedded silty sand layers 15 3/5/7 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 97 9 very silty, fine grained 20 :2/4/6 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy ML 89 31 Total Depth = 21.5' Recovered Sample No Bedrock No Groundwater 25 30 35 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 BorinLr 1\o. 5 Job No.: 544-3001 oC.0DESCRIPTION � Cz Cz REMARKS E O ^ U U U) o 0 Sand: Broxvn, SP/SM 4/6/5 slightly silty, fine grained 100 6 --- 9% passing ft200 Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 orinEr No. 6 Job No.:.544-3001 o DESCRIPTION ° REMARKS �`. °' 3 �� - ° ��-� a� a c _. >n to O U �O q to C U a p o v - 0 Sand`. Brown, . SP/SM slightly silty, fine grained 4/7/11 103 6 --- 10 3/6/11 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 94 7 15 6/9/8 Sand: Brown, SP/SM 95 8 - slightly silty, fine grained 20 • 4/11/14 r I 103 I 6 --- Total Depth = 21.3' _ ® Recovered Sample No Bedrock - No Groundwater 25 I 30 35 , 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions inay be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 orina No. 7 Job No.: 544-3001 o " Ui DESCRIPTION a �2 >.E; REMARKS 0 Sand: Brown. SP/SM - slightly silty. fine grained 5 5/8/10 103 4 10 :4/7/11 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 98 4 ___ 15 3/G/7 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 87 9 ••. with thin clay layers 20 Sandy Silt: Brown, ML 4/9/11 ve sandy 99 19 i SRecovered Sample ! I Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock i j No Groundwater 2_ 0 30 35 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 BorinLr No. 8 Job No.: 544-3001 y o ° DESCRIPTION >, REMARKS -a W �C), o ci v co U p ° Silty Sand: Brown, SM very silty, fine grained 5 4/4/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL 88 34 --- 10 5/10/15, Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 104 5 to 2/5/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL 82 38 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/9/9 fine grained 102 _ Total Depth = 21.5' ® Recovered Sample No Bedrock No Groundwater 25 30 35 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines represent the approximate 55 boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Boring No.9 Job No.: 544-3001 3 � a� o 0 DESCRIPTION ° Q Cz 0 REMARKS CD 0 n Ga M U q cis 3 U ° Silty Sand: Brown, SM very silty, fine grained 5 21217 " 96 21 10 212/3 Silty Clay: Brown CL 79 42 --- 15 2/3/3 81 41 •-- 20 2/6/6 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 87 25 --- Total Depth = 21.5' - Recovered Sample No Bedrock - No Groundwater 25 30 35 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field and returned to our laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing was generally performed in two phases. The first phase consisted of testing in order to determine the compaction of the existing natural soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics of the soil and to serve as a basis for selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing. This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order to provide a means of developing specific design recommendations based on the mechanical properties of the soil. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of the soil in its natural condition. The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Log. Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-91, Test Method A. The results of this testing are presented graphically in this appendix. The maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing relative compaction to the soil. This is shown on the Boring Log, and is useful in estimating the strength and compressibility of the soil. Classification Testing: Soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of mechanical grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits determinations. These provide information for developing classifications for the soil in accordance with the Unified Classification System. This classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The results of this testing are very useful in detecting variations in the soils and in selecting samples for further testing. SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING Direct Shear Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Direct Shear Testing. This testing measures the shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used in developing parameters for foundation design and lateral design. Testing was performed using recompacted test specimens, which were saturated prior to testing. Testing was performed using a strain controlled test apparatus with normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot. Expansion Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. This testing consists of remolding 4-inch diameter by 1-inch thick test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50 percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear expansion is then measured until complete. Consolidation Testing: Four relatively undisturbed samples were selected for consolidation testing. For this testing one -inch thick test specimens are subjected to vertical Loads varying from 575 psf to 11520 psf applied progressively. The consolidation at each load increment was recorded prior to placement of each subsequent load. The specimens were saturated at the 575 psf or 720 psf load increment. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture ASTM D6981D1557 * Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Lab ID Number: Sample Location: B I @ 0-5' Description: Silghtly Silty Sand Maximum Density: 110 pcf Optimum Moisture 13.5% 14 14 13 C- 12' IN IH 110 105 100 Sieve Size , % Retained 3 74—"� 3/8" #4 0.0 January 17, 2003 ASTMD-1557 A Rammer Type: Machine < ----- Zero Air Voids Lines, N N OW 5 10 15 Moisture Content, % 20 25 Max Density Sladden Engineering Revised 12/03/02 Direct Shear ASTM D 3080-90 (modified for unconsolidated, undrained conditions) Job Number 544-3001 January 17, 200 Job Name Monroe & Ave 52 Initial Dry Density: 96.8 pct Lab ID Numbe Initial Mosture Content: 14.0 °'o Sample ID Boring l @ 0-5' Peak Friction Angle (0): 27' Soil Descriptio Silty Sand Cohesion (c): 60 pst Sample Type Remolded @ 90%° of Maximum Density Test Results 1 2 3 4 Average Moisture Content, % 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 Saturation. % 73.2 73.2 73.2 73.2 7 3. 2 Normal Stress, kips 0.151 0.301 0.603 1.206 Peak Stress, kips 0.153) 0.207 0.342 0.675 1.2 1.0 0.8 L L 0.6 u ZZ 0.4 0.2 0.0 1 • Peak Stress Linear (Peak Stress) I i i i i t I i i 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 , 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Normal Stress Direct Shear Sladden Engineering Revised 12/0=102 Gradation ASTM C 1 17 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Monroe & Ave.52 Sample ID: Boring 1 @ 0-5 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size, nun Passing 1" 25.4 100 3/4" 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 100 #8 2.36 100 #16 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30 95 #100 0.15 66 #200 0.074 37 100 - - --- II� il!!!I I III!I! ! �I!' • 90 80 70 60 !Cn 'i N 50 -- I' i40 I I I ! 30 20 i i ! !III i I I ! ; I ! ; ! --=-- I , I I • ; I _ 10 0 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 Gradation - ASTM C1 17 & C136 Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe& Ave 52 Sample ID: 3 @10 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size, mrn Passing 111 25.4 100 3/4f' 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 100 #8 236 100 #16 1.18 100 430 0.60 100 #50 0.310 94 4100 0.15 J, #200 0.074 7 January 17, 2003 100 - J 90 - 80 70 I I I I I i !I!' i II!�I I! I I I I I. i 60 V) fli 03 50 - C- 40 - 10 20 - HI I. i I I I I I I i I I i 10 I PH i 0 — 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 Gradation ASTM C1 17 & C136 Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 5@15 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size, mm Passing 111 25.4 100 3/4" 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 100 #8 2.36 100 #16 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30 73 #100 0.15 27 4200 0.074 7 January 17, 2003 100 - lilt' itI I I TI III 90 80 -II I Jill I i I 70 - 60 - cc 50 1111 40 W .30 20 10 17- 0- 100.0 10.0 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised 1 1/20/02 Gradation ASTM Cl 17 & C136 Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 8@10 January 17, 2003 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size, mrn Passing 25.4 loo 3/43 " 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 94 4.75 100 98 2.36 100 916 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30 94 #100 0.15 .39 #200 0.074 6 100 I A go - 1 1111 1 1 1 80 - 70 60 - C T I C/) 50 - 40 - 10 20 - if 10 1H I 0 H 1 III 11 111111 1 1 1 - 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mrn Gradation Sladden Engineering L, Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 1 @2 Soil Description: Silty Sand -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 r 0.0 1.0 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density; pcf: 84.2 Initial Moisture, W 26 Initial Void Ratio: 0.980 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram —0 Before Saturation —6 After Saturation —9 Rebound Hydro Consolidation v� I� �I 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 January 17, 200' Job Name: Monroe & .Ave 52 Initial Dry Density; pcf: 91.6 Sample ID: 1 @5 Initial Moisture, %: 25 Soil Description: Silty Sand Initial Void Ratio: 0.819 Specific Gravity: 2.67 il, % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram - 0 Before Saturation — A After Saturation 9 Rebound — W— Hydro Consolidation !!' i I l i i lII I ' I I i I I ! I ---- I I I i i I l l i I I I l I I i f I I ! I I I i I I I I i I i I 1 t I i I i i I I I I l i I I I _— �------ - :—f ,--- 1I I , it 1i I i i I 7h _ - I -- I 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 1 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 6@5 Soil Description: Slightly Silty Sand -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf: 100.1 Initial Moisture, %: 6 Initial Void Ratio: 0.665 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram 0 Before Saturation - A After Saturation -e Rebound -- Hydro Consolidation c v 0 0 0 o Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 9@5 Soil Description: Silty Sand January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf: 100.2 Initial Moisture, %: 21 Initial Void Ratio: 0.663 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram —0 Before Saturation — 6 After Saturation —e Rebound --w— Hydro Consolidation -2 --- I - -� I I I I I I i I i ! I I! '• I' i ! i i i I t I -4 -5 - I -6 -.% -s -9 I ! I I • I i -10 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 Expansion Index ASTM D 4829/UBC 29-2 Job Number: 544-3001 Date: 1/17/03 Job'Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Tech: Leslie Lab ID: Sample ID: B 1 0-5 Soil Description: Wt of Soil + Ring: 540.0 Weight of Ring: 179.0 Wt of Wet Soil: 361.0 Percent Moisture: 14% 109.4 Wet Density; pcf: Dry Denstiy, pcf: 96.0 •50.0 Saturation: Expansion Kac►c ;F. Date/Time 1 /21 /03 8:50 AM Initial Reading 0.500 Final Reading 0.503 Expansion Index (Final - Initial) x 1000 3 El Sladden Engineering Revised 12/10/02 ANAHEIM TEST LABORATORY 3008 S. ORANGE AVENUE - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707 PHONE (714.) 549-7267 TO:, SLADDEN ENGINEERING: 6782 STANTON AVE. SUITE E DATE: 1/15/03 BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 Po. No.Chain of Custody Shipper No. ATTN: BRETT/DAVE Lob: No. A-2575 Specification: Material: SOIL PROJECT: #544-3001 MONROE & AVE. 52 B1 @ 0-5' ANALYTICAL REPORT CORROSION SERIES SUMMARY OF DATA pH SOLUBLE SULFATES SOLUBLE CHLORIDES MIN. RESISTIVITY per Ca. 417 per Ca. 422 per Ca. 643 ppm ppm ohm -cm 8.0 100 131 2,059 FORM N2 APPENDIX C 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria February 6, 2003 -14- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN INFORMATION The International Conference of Building Officials 1997 Uniform Building Code contains substantial revisions and additions to the earthquake engineering section in Chapter 16. Concepts contained in the code that will be relevant to construction of the.proposed structures are summarized below. Ground shaking is expected to be the primary hazard most likely to affect the site, based upon proximity to significant faults capable of generating large earthquakes. Major fault zones considered to be most likely to create strong ground shaking at the site are listed below. Fault Zone Approximate Distance From Site Fault Type 1997 UBC San Andreas 8.9 km A j San Jacinto 32.7 km A Based on our field observations and understanding of local geologic conditions, the soil profile type judged applicable to this site is Sp, generally described as stiff or dense soil. The site is located within UBC Seismic Zone 4. The following table presents additional coefficients and factors relevant to seismic Mitigation for new construction upon adoption of the 1997 code. Near -Source I near -Source Seismic Seismic Seismic i Acceleration Velocity Coefficient Coefficient i Source Factor, Na Factor, N,. Ca C,. I ' San Andreas 1.04 1.28 0.44Na 0.64N,. San Jacinto 1.0 1.0 0.44Na 0.64N,. Slad4rlen Eit ineerim JOB NUMBER: 544-3001 *********************** * * * E Q F A U L T * * * Version 3.00 * * DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS DATE: 01-17-2003 JOB NAME: SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street Indio Area Riverside County, California CALCULATION NAME: Test Run Analysis FAULT -DATA -FILE NAME: CDN;GFLTE.DAT SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.6669 SITE LONGITUDE: 116.2383 SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. SOIL (310) UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=Sigma):,M Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cd_2drp. SCOND: 0 Basement Depth: 5.00 km Campbell SSR: Campbell SHR: COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT -DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.DAT MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 0.0 Page 1 --------------- EQFAULT SUMMARY --------------- ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS (ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE ----=-------------------------- ABBREVIATED DISTANCE MAXIMUM I PEAK JEST. SITE FAULT NAME I mi (km) JEARTHQUAKE1 SITE JINTENSITY I I MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. a IMOD.MERC. SAN ANDREAS - Coachella SAN ANDREAS - Southern. SAN JACINTO-ANZA BURNT MTN. SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK EUREKA PEAK SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino SAN JACINTO - BORREGO PINTO MOUNTAIN EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. PISGAH-BULLION MTN.-MESQUITE LK LANDERS BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE EARTHQUAKE VALLEY SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) ELSINORE-JULIAN ELMORE RANCH JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) CALICO - HIDALGO ELSINORE-TEMECULA ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto)) LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGS1 NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO ELSINORE-GLEN IVY IMPERIAL LAGUNA SALADA CLEGHORN ROSE CANYON NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) CHINO -CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) CUCAMONGA WHITTIER SAN ANDREAS - Mojave SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture SAN JOSE I 5.5( 8.9)1 7.1 1 0.366 1 IX 5.5( 8.9)1 7.4 1 0.429 1 X 20.3( 32.7)I 7.2 1 0.158 1 VIII 20.7( 33.3)1 6.4 1 0.102 1 VII 21.3( 34.3)1 6.8 1 0.123 1 VII 21.4( 34.4)I 6.4 1 0.100 1 VII 22.3( 35.9)1 7.3 1. 0.155 1 VIII 32.5( 52..3)1 6.6 1 0.080 1 VII 33.1( 53.2)1 7.0 1 0.098 1 VII 33.9( 54.5)1 6.9 1 0.091 1 VII 35.0( 56.01 7.1 1 0.099 1 VII 35.7( 57.4)I 7.3 1 0.108 1 VII 37.8( 60.8)I 6.4 1 0.064 1 VI 39.0( 62.8)1 6.5 1 0.066 1 VI 39.3( 63.3)1 6.9 1 0.081 VII 40.8( 65.7)1 6.7 ( 0.086 VII 43.0( 69.2)) 7.1 1 0.084 1 VII 45.2( 72.7)1 6.6 1 0.062 1 VI 46.4( 74.7)I 6.7 1 0.064 1 VI 47.7( 76.7)1 7.1 1 0.078 1 VII 48.9( 78.7)I 6.8 1 0.065 1 VI 49.2( 79.1)1 6.8 1 0.065 1 VI 50.1( 80.7)1 -6.6 1 0.057 I VI 50.8( 81.8)1. 6.6 1 0.057 1 VI 52.5( 84.5)1 7.3 1 0.080 1 VII 53.1( 85.01 7.0 1 0.083 1 VII 60.6( 97.5)1 7.1 1 0.065 I VI 62.3( 100.2)1 6.7 1 0.051 1 VI 63.8( 102.7)1 6.8 1 0.053 1 VI 64.9( 104.4)I '7.0 I 0.058 1 VI 68.4( 110.0)J 7.0 0.056 1 VI 69.9( 112.5)1 6.5 1 0.042 1 VI 76.9( 123.7)1 6.9 1 0.048 1 VI 77.1.( 124.1)1 6.9 1 0.046 1 VI 77.2( 124.3)1 ' 6.7 1 0.053 1 VI 77.4( 124.6)1 7:0 1 0.062 1 VI 81r5( 131.1)1 6.8 .I 0.044 1 VI 86.5( 139.2)1 7.1 0.049 1 VI 86.5( 139.2)1 7.8 0.0711 VI 89.0( 141.2)1 F s I 0.041 1 VT r � � DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page 2 JESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT (.APPROXIMATE ------------------------------- ABBREVIATED DISTANCE MAXIMUM I- PEAK JEST. SITE FAULT NAME mi (km) JBARTHQUAKEI SITE. JINTENSITY 1 MAG.(Mw) ACCEL. g IMOD.MERC. CORONADO BANK 91.8( 147.7)1 7.4 0.055 1 VI SIERRA MADRE 91.8( 147.8)1 7.0 0.054 1 VI GRAVEL HILLS — HARPER LAKE 91.9( 147..9)1 6.9 0.042 VI ELYSIAN PARK THRUST I 93.8( 151.0)1 6.7 I 0.045 VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) 1 97.1( 156.2)1 6.9 0.040 V -END OF SEARCH- 45 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED'SEARCH•RADIUS. THE SAN ANDREAS - Coachella FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.5 MILES (8.9 km) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM -EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.4290 g CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street / Indio Area 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 STRIKE -SLIP FAULTS 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - SOIL (310) M=5 M=6 M=7 M=8 1 C: 0 .1 c� ^L, W .001 1 10 100 Distance (adist] (km) DIP -SLIP FAULTS 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - SOIL (310) M=5 M=6 M=7 M=8 1 ,— o .1 c� L U U Q -.01. .001 1 10 - 100.. Distance [adistj (km) BLIND -THRUST FAULTS 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - SOIL (310) M=5 M=6 M=7 M=8 1 o .1 L .00`1 1 10 100 Distance [adistj (km) i MAXIMUM EARTHQUAKES SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street / Indio Area 1 .01 .001 .1 1 10 100' Distance (mi) EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES & DISTANCES SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street /Indio Area 7.75 7.50 75� 7.25' 7.00 c� 6.75 6.50 .1 1 10 100 Distance (mi) MCKINZIE ELECTRIC 79-607 Country Club Dr., Ste.#3 Bermuda Dunes, CA, 92201 (760)360=0728- CTRIC PROPOSAL VQ 0GiT oFpq �N RANCHO SANTANA CITY OF LA QU-INTA, CA �1� MCKINZIE ELECTRIC 79-607 Country Club Dr., Ste.#3 Bermuda Dunes, CA, 92201 (760)360-0728 ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS JOB NAME: Rancho Santana Plan 1 2,130 s ft. @ 3w 6,390 w 2 Small appliance circuits 1500w 3,000 w 2 F.A.U. 900w 1,800 w 1 Water Heater 1800w 1,800 w 1 Dishwasher 1200w 1,200 w 1 Garbage Disposal 900w 900 w 1 Microwave 1,500w 1,500 w 1 Refrigerator 1,500w 1,500 _ w 1 Cook top 6,000w 0 w 0 Range 8,000w 0 w 1 Oven (double) 8,000w 8,000 w . 0 Trash compactor 1,200w 0 w 0 lee maker 1,2000w 0 w 1 Dryer 1,800w 1,800 w 1 Washer 500w 500 w 1 Pool/spa 7,200w 7,200 w 1 Landscape/Irriaation 1,200w 1,200 w Spare 8,000w 8,000 w Total Load 43,890w H.V.A.C. Loads (i� 100% 1 A/C Circuits 14,400w 14;400w 2 A/C Circuits 7,700w 7;700w Total H.V.A.C. 21,600w Calculated load + H.V.A.C. 45,156w 45,156w/240 volts 188.15 Anws 88 Am1 11"NUNCHO SANTANA PLAN I 2,130 SQ. F1'. A. GENERAL LIGHTING 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 25 6" ICHSG (ALL'PRO)W/TRIMS & LAMP AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOXES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 48"DBL. TUBE FLUORESCENT SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 BRACKET LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOX AS PER PLAN. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 5 CEILING LIGHT/FAN J-BOXES AS PER PLAN 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES AND J- BOXES AS PER PLAN. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 BRAON FLUOR LIGHT/FAN FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. 8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 BRAON EX FAN FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 CRES 24" UNDER CABINET FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. B. GENERAL RECEPTACLES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 25 15A 120V WHT RECEPTACLES -AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 12 15A GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 20A GFCI WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2.WP GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. C. DEDICATED CIRCUITS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V WASHER/DRYER CIR. AND 1 20A WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D.O. CIR. AND 2 15A WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI GARAGE CIR. AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI BATHROOM CIRCUTIS. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 120V*GFCI SMALL APPLIANCE KIT. CIR. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V REFRI.CIR. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D. CIR. 8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V D.W. CIR. 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V MICRO/STOVE CIR. 10. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 220V DBL. WALL OVEN CIR. 11. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120 FAU CIR. 12. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 220V A.C. CIR'S & FUSABLE DISC. 13. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM CIR. & 5 INTER CONNECT. SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM FIXT. W/9V BACK UP BATTERY. 14. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 120V 20A GEN. RECEPTACLE CIR'S. 15. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 120V 15A GEN. LIGHTING CIR'S. D.LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 INTER -CONNECTED PHONE JACK'S AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 RG-6 HOME RUNS AND 4 CABLE JACK'S AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 16V ILLUMINATED PUSH BUTTON DOOR BELL AND 16V CHIME AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/16V TRASFORMER. E. SWITCHES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 36 120V 15A S.P. SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 7 120V 15A 3 WAY SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 60OW PHOTOCELL AS PER PLAN. F.PANEL/BREAKERS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/240V 24-42 ALL IN ONE 225A FLUSH MOUNT METERED MAIN PANEL. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 15A S.P. BRKRS. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 15A S.P. AFCI BRKRS AS PER N.E.0 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 10 20A S.P. ST.-I BRKRS. S. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 50A 2.P BRKRS. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 30A 2.P BRKR. F G.EXCLUSIONS 1. CITY PERMITS 2. CHANGES AFTER ROUGH -IN 3. EXTRAS NOT ON PLANS PRICE PHONE/CABLE TOTAL _ $9, 585. 00 $1,025.00 $10,610.00 ]RANCHO SANTANA CASITA -. A. GENERAL LIGHTING. 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 6" I.C. HSG (ALL PROW/TRIMS & FIXTURE AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOX AS PER PLAN._ 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 BRACKET LIGH2 FIXTURE J-BOX AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 CEILING LIGHT/FAN J-BOX AS PER PLAN. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 BROAN FLUOR. LIGHT/FAN FIXTURE AS PER PLAN, B. GENERAL RECEPTACLES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 15A WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 20A GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 15 WP GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. C. DEDICATED CIRCUITS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 15A GEN. LIGHTING CIR. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 20A GEN. RECEPTACLE CIR. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 15A WATER HEATER CIR. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1.120V 15A F.A.U. CIR. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 220V 30A A.C. CIR. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM CIR. AND INTER -CONNECT SMOKE DETTECTOR/ALARM FIXTURE W/9V BACK UP BATTERY. D. LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL_1 INTER -CONNECTED PHONE JACK AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 CABLE JACK AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) E. SWITCHES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 6 120V 15A S.P. SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 120V 15A 3 WAY SWITCHES AS PER " PLAN . 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 30A FUSABLE A.C. DISCONNECT F. PANEL/BREAKERS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/240V 12-24 70A FLUSH MOUNT LOAD CENTER. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 15A S.P. BRKRS. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 120V 20A S.P. BRKRS. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120/240V 30A 2.P BRKR. G. EXCLUSIONS 1. CITY PERMITS 2. CHANGES AFTER ROUGH -IN 3. EXTRAS NOT ON PLANS PRICE $1,500.00 PHONE/CABLE $3,50.00 TOTAL = $1,850.00 MCKINZIE ELECTRIC 79-607 Country Club Dr., Ste.#3 Bermuda Dunes, CA, 92201 (760)360-0728 ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS JOB NAME: Rancho Santama Plant 2,600 s ft. @ 3w 7,800 w 2 Small appliance circuits 1500w 1,500 w 2 F.A.U. 900w 1,800 w 1 Water Heater 1800w 1,800 w 1 Dishwasher 1200w 1,200 w 1 Garbage Disposal 900w 900 w 1 Microwave 1,500w 1,500 w 1 Refrigerator 1,500w 1,500 w 1 Cook top 6,000w 0 w 0 Range 8,000w 0 w 1 Oven double 8,000w 8,000 w 0 Trash compactor 1,200w 0 w 0 Ice maker 1,200w 0 w 1 Dryer 1,800w 2,400 w 1 Washer 500w 500 w 1 Pool/spa 7,200w 7,200 w 1 Landscape/Irrigation 1,200w 1,200 w Spare 8,000w 8,000 w Total Load 45,300w Calculations Is' I Okw @ 100% J. 10,000 w Remaining 33,890w P, 40% 1 14,120 w Calculated load 24,120w HN.A.C. Loads (a,100% 1 A/C Circuits 14,400w 14;400w 2 A/C Circuits 7,700w 7,700w Total HN.A.C. 21,600w Calculated load + HN.A.C. 45,720w 45,720w/240 volts 190.05 Amps 1 Total Demand load 190 Amps I'�A\ C l I O SANTANA PLAN .00 A. GENERAL LIGHTING 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 27 6" ICHSG (ALL PRO)W/TRIMS & LAMP AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOXES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 48"DBL. TUBE FLUORESCENT SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AS.PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 BRACKET LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOX AS PER PLAN. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 5 CEILING LIGHT/FAN J-BOXES AS PER PLAN 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES AND J- BOXES AS PER PLAN. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3'BRAON FLUOR LIGHT/FAN FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. 8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 BRAON EX FAN FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 CRES 24" UNDER CABINET FIXTURES AS PER PLAN.- B. GENERAL.RECEPTACLES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 31 15A 120V WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 14 15A GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN.- 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 20A GFCI WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 WP GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. C. DEDICATED CIRCUITS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V WASHER/DRYER CIR. AND 1 20A WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D.O - CIR. AND.2 15A WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI'GARAGE CIR. AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNI,SH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI BATHROOM CIRCUTIS.- 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2.120V GFCI SMALL APPLIANCE KIT. CIR. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V REFRI.CIR. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D. CI.R. .8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V D.W. CIR. - 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V MICRO/STOVE CIR. 10. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1'220V DBL. WALL OVEN CIR. 11. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120 FAU CIR. 12. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 .220V A..C. CIR'S & FUSABLE DISC. - 13. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM CIR. & 5 INTER CONNECT. SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM FIXT. W/9V BACK UP BATTERY. 14. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 120V 20A GEN. RECEPTACLE CIR'S. 15. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 120V 15A GEN. LIGHTING CIR'S. D.LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 5 INTER -CONNECTED PHONE JACK'S AS PER PLAN.(OPTIONAL) 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 5 RG-6 HOME RUNS AND 4 CABLE JACK'S AS PER PLAN.- (OPTIONAL) 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 16V ILLUMINATED PUSH BUTTON DOOR BELL AND 16V CHIME AS PER PLA'1. `4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/16V TRASFORMER. E. SWITCHES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 36 120V 15A S.P. SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 8 120V 15A 3 WAY SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH.AND INSTALL 1 120V 60OW PHOTOCELL AS PER PLAN. F.PANEL/BREAKERS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/2!40V 24-42 ALL IN ONE 225A FLUSH MOUNT METERED MAIN PANEL. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 15A S.P. BRKRS. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 15A S.P. AFC- BRKRS AS PER N.E.0 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 10 20A S.P. STACK BRKRS. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 50A 2.P BRKRS. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 30A 2.P BRKR. G.EXCLUSIONS 1. CITY PERMITS r 2. CHANGES AFTER ROUGH -IN 3. EXTRAS NOT ON PLANS PRICE _ $11,700.00 PHONE/CABLE _ $1,025.00 TOTAL' _ $12,725.00 MCKINZIE ELECTRIC 79-607 Country Club Dr., Ste.#3 Bermuda Dunes, CA, 92201 (760)360-0728 ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS JOB NAME: Raicho Santaaa Plan 3 2,600 s ft. @ 3w 7,800 w 2 Small appliance circuits 1500w 1,500 w 2 F.A.U. 900w 1,800 w 1 Water Heater 1800w 1,800 w 1 Dishwasher 1200w 1,200 w , 1 Garbage Disposal 900w 900 w 1 Microwave 1,500w 1,500 w 1 Refrigerator 1 500w w 1 Cook top 6,000w .1,500 0, w 0 Range 8,000w 0 w 1 Oven (double) 8,000w 8,000 w 0 Trash compactor 1,200w 0 w 0 Ice maker 1,200w 0. w 1 Dryer 1,800w 2,400 w 1 Washer 500w 500 w 1 Pool/spa 7,200w 7,200 w 1 Landscape/Irrigation 1,200w 1,200 w Spare 8,000w 8,000 w Total Load 45,300w 1" l okw @ 100% 10,000 w Remainin 33,890w 40% 28,871 w Calculated load 38,871w HN.A.C. Loads @ 100% f A/C Circuits 14,400w 14,400 , 2 A/C'Circuits 7,700w 74-700w Total HN.A.C. 21,600w L Calculated load + g,V A,C 60,471w RANCHO SANTANATLAN 3 2,863 sit. Fr. A. GENERAL LIGHTING 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 29 6" ICHSG (ALL PROW/TRIMS & LAMP AS PER PLAN . . 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 6 CEILING LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOXES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 48"DBL. TUBE FLUORESCENT SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 BRACKET LIGHT FIXTURE J-BOX AS PER PLAN. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 6 CEILING LIGHT/FAN J-BOXES AS PER PLAN 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES AND J- BOXES AS PER PLAN. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 BRAON FLUOR LIGHT/FAN FIXTURES AS PER -PLAN. 8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 BRAON EX FAN FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 CRES 24" UNDER CABINET . FIXTURES AS PER PLAN. B..GENERAL RECEPTACLES 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 43 15A 120V WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 16 15A GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 20A GFCI WHT.RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN: 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 W,P GFCI PROTECTED WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. C. DEDICATED CIRCUITS. 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V WASHER/DRYER CIR. AND 1 20A WHT RECEPTACLE AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D.O. CIR. AND 2 15A WHT RECEPTACLES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI GARAGE CIR. AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V GFCI BA.HROOM CIRCUTIS.' 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 120V GFCI SMALL APPLIANCE KIT. CIR. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V REFRI.CIR. 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V G.D. CIR. 8. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V D.W.-CIR. 9. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V MICRO4STOVE CIR. 10. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 220V DBL. WALL OVEN CIR. 11. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120 FAU CIR. 12. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 220V A.C. CIR'S & FUSABLE DISC. 13. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM CIR., & 5 INTER CONNECT. SMOKE DETECTOR/ALARM FIXT. W/9V BACK UP BATTERY. 14. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 120V 20A GEN. RECEPTACLE CIR'S. 15. FURNISH AND INSTALL 4 120V 15A GEN. LIGHTING CIR'S. D.LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM 1. FURNISH AND.INSTALL 5 INTER -CONNECTED PHONE JACK'S AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 5 RG-6 HOME RUNS AND 4 CABLE JACK'S AS PER PLAN. (OPTIONAL) 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 16V ILLUMINATED PUSH BUTTON DOOR BELL AND 16V CHIME AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/16V TRASFORMER. E. SWITCHES 1.'FURNISH AND INSTALL 41 120V 15A S.P. SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 8 120V 15A 3 WAY SWITCHES AS PER PLAN. 3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 60OW PHOTOCELL AS PER PLAN. 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V 15A 4 WAY. SWITCH AS PER PLAN F.PANEL/BREAKERS 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 120V/240V 24-42 ALL IN ONE 400A FLUSH MOUNT METERED MAIN PANEL. 2. FURNISH AND INSTALL 3 15A S.P. BRKRS. -3. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 15A S.P. AFCI BRKRS AS PER N.E.0 4. FURNISH AND INSTALL 10 20A S.P. STACK BRKRS. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 50A 2.P BRKRS. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL 1.30A 2.P BRKR. G.EXCLUSIONS 1. CITY PERMITS 2. CHANGES AFTER ROUGH -IN 3. EXTRAS NOT ON PLANS PRICE $12,883.00 PHONE/CABLE $1,025.00 TOTAL = $13,908.00 `,S \NSPECTION 6 rFfj 'q N.O. O RE" JtedA TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION, INC. dba GENERAL TESTING.AND INSPECTION AGENCY 105 SE 124' AVENUE VANCOUVER, WA 98684 We are an inspection agency recognized by the International Conference of Building Officials. Council of American Building Officials NER — QA275J i This is to verify that: SPATES FABRICATORS, INC 85-435 . MIDDLETON STREET . THERMAL, CA 92274 is under our Audited Quality Control Program and has been since: JUNE, 1990 We audit the production Quarterly under the Uniform Building Code Section 2304.4.4. TONY LEWIN MANAGER OF WESTERN TRUSS DIVISION 19 -t7 RE- PORT TM ER-5352 Reissued July 1, 2001 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. • 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 . www.icboes.org Filing Category: DESIGN —Wood (038) WAVE" METAL CONNECTOR PLATE FOR WOOD TRUSSES ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC. 1950 MARLEY DRIVE HAINES CITY, FLORIDA 33844 1.0 SUBJECT WAVE- Metal Connector Plate for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: The WAVE plate is a metal connector plate for wood trusses. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel in various lengths and widths and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit loads between truss wood members. Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The WAVE plate is manufactured from No. 20 gage (0.0356 inch (0.90 mm)), ASTM A 653-94 SO, Grade 40, structural - quality steel with a hot -dipped galvanized coating designated G60. The WAVE plate has slots approximately 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) long by 0.12 inch (3.0 mm) wide that have been punched along the longitudinal axis of the plate. Each punched slot forms two opposite -facing, sharply pointed teeth protruding at right angles from the parent metal. The punched slots are spaced approximately 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) on center across the width of the plate and approximately 1 inch (25.4 mm) on cen- ter along the length of the plate, with adjacent longitudinal rows staggered 0.06 inch (1.5 mm). Connector plates are available in 1-inch (25.4 mm) increments of width and length. Minimum plate width and length are 1 inch (25.4 mm) and 2 inches (51 mm), respectively. See Figure 5 for details of plate dimensions. There are 8 teeth per square inch (1.24 teeth per square centimeter) of plate surface. The length of each tooth, includ- ing the thickness of the parent metal, is approximately 0.41 inch (10.4 mm), and the width of each tooth is approximately 0:12 inch (3.05 mm). The shank of each tooth is concave and the tip of each tooth is twisted approximately 40 degrees with respect to the plate width. 2.3 Allowable Loads: Tables 1, 2 and 3 show allowable lateral loads, tension loads and shear loads for the WAVE metal plate connectors. Also, refer to Figures 1, 2 and 3 for load conditions. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed to transfer the required load without exceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, as determined by species, the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and the direction of load relative to grain. Design for lateral resistance must be in accordance with Section 11.2.1 ofANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 1 shows allowable lateral loads for the metal connector plates. 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the metal connector plate relative to the direction of the load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads (in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connector plates, based on the net section of the metal connector plates for tension joints, which is the allow- able tensile stress of the metal multiplied by the metal con- nector plate tensile effectiveness ratio. 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. The net section of the metal connector plates for heel joints and otherjoints involving shear must be designed using the allowable shear values (shown in Table 3 in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connec- tor plates, which is the allowable shear stress of the metal multiplied by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in Table 3. 2.3.4 Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable -load re- duction factors for the metal plates must be considered cumu- latively, when applicable, in the design of metal connector plates used in fabricated wood trusses. The reduction factors to be considered cumulatively are as follows: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by a strength reduction factor, OR, shown in Table 4, when the plates are installed in lumber with a single -pass, full -embedment roller sys- tem having minimum roller diameters equal to 18 inches (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embedment hydraulic -platen presses, multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic-plat- en presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller. When trusses are fabricated with single -pass roller press- es, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the mini- mum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength -reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members. 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the WAVE metal connector plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 percent at the time of truss fabrication. E REPORTS —are not to he consented its representing aesthetics or anv other attributes nor specilicully addressed. nor are thec to he cunsexpress ss ,r endorsement of the subject n! the report or it recommendation for its use. rhere is no n•arrtunr br ICBU Etvhumun Service• t Inc..lnc., r.tpresx ur unphrt/..ty ru unr lindia.S ur other miner in tho report. or as to um product cuvetrd by the report. Copyright .d; 2001 Page 1 of 5 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for WAVE metal con- nector plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated wood truss must be reduced by the heel -joint reduction factor. HR, as follows: HR = 0.85 - 0.05 (12 tan 0 - 2.0) where: 0.65 <_ HR <_ 0.85 8 = angle between lines of action of the top and bottom chords shown in Figure 4. This heel -joint reduction factor does not apply to conditions with top chord slopes greater than 12:12. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each WAVE metal connector plate must be designed for combined shear and tension capacity, based on the orientation of the metal con- nector plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for combined shear and tension must be in accordance with Sec- tion 11.2.4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Metal con- nector plates designed only for axial forces are permitted as splices in the top and bottom chord located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment. Design of metal connector plates located at splices in the top and bot- tom chord not located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calcu- lated point of zero moment must include combined flexure and axial stresses. 2.4 Truss Design: Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. The truss design must show compliance with the code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads for the metal connector plates may be increased for duration of load in accordance with Section 2335.5 of the code. Cal- culations need to specify the deflection ratio or the maximum deflection for live and total load. For each truss design draw- ing, the following information, at a minimum, should be speci- fied by the design engineer: 1. Truss slope or depth, span and spacing. 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of metal connector plates at each joint. 4. Truss chord and web. lumber size, species and grade. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loans, concentrated loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- quake loads. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TPI 1-1995 and any adjustments to lumber -and -metal -connector -plate al- lowable values for conditions of use. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: - Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- cator who has an approved quality assurance program cover- ing thewood truss manufacturing and inspection process in accordance with Sections 2343.7 and 2343.8 of the code and Section 4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995, National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction. The allow- able loads recognized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneu- A matic embedment presses; multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed ty full embedment rollers; com- binations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic or pneumatic presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press: or, if the adjustment factors given in Table 4 are used, single- (' pass roller presses. I When truss fabricators use single -pass roller presses. the rollers must have minimum 18-inch (457 mm) diameters. Plates embedded with a single -pass, full -embedment roller press must be preset before passing through the roller press by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a hammer. i1i Identification: Each WAVE metal connector plate is embossed with the iden- tifying mark `WAVE" stamped into the parent metal. 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED , Test data in accordance with National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 4.0 FINDINGS t That the WAVE metal connector plate for wood trusses complies with the 1997 Uniform Building Code-, subject to the following conditions: 4.1 For the trusses using metal connector plates de- scribed in this report, plans and calculations must be submitted to the building official. 4.2 The metal connector plates are designed to trans- fer the required loads in accordance with the de- sign formulae in ANSVTPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the j building official. 4.3 The allowable loads for the metal connector plates must comply with this evaluation report. 4.4 Teeth of metal connector plates placed in knots, bark, pitch pockets, holes, and joint gaps are con- sidered Ineffective. 4.5 Metal connector plates are installed in pairs on op- 1 poslte faces of truss members connected by the a plates. 4.6 Trusses using metal connector plates described In this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator , approved by the building official In accordance with Sections 2311.6 and 2343.E of the code. 4.7 Allowable loads shown in the tables In this report may be increased for duration of load in accord- ance with Section 2335.5 of the code. 4.8 Application of the allowable loads (shown in the t tables in this report) for metal connector plates em- bedded in lumber treated with fire -resistive chemi- cals is outside the scope of this report. 4.9 Where one -hour fire -resistive rating is required for trusses using WAVE connectors, see evaluation re- ports ER-1632 and ER-5640. This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ER-5352 TABLE 1--ALLOWABLE LATERAL RESISTANCE VALUES FOR THE WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATEt l L'MBEF SPEiaES DIq ECTION OF GRAtN ANC LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATEr t AA EA AE PLATE MODEL AE I _Specific We AlbwaOta Loae Pet /late Donee - - - IP Per square inch of plate contact areal EE METAL PLATE VALUES RATED BY GROSS AREA METHOD Douglas ;ir j U.»9 _ 206 156 Hem -fir 0 Southern p:ne i (1.5� 164 109 IU6 206 124 WAVE` Spruce-pint-!ir O.w: 158 163 159 109 106 170 II$ METAL PLATE VALUES RATED BY SEMI -NET AREA METHOD' Douglas tie i 0.�9 275 195. I15 153 Hem -tie 0.43 208 Southern pine 0.53 275.134 ;06 124 ." 134 163 Spruce -pine -fir 0.42 108•`°, 130 106 170 For SI: I inch 25.4 mm. 1 psi a 6.S9 kPa. 118 !See Figure I for a description of plate orientation. 'The tabulated values are for a single plate. The values are doubled for plates installed on both faces of a joint if area Is calculated for a single plate. 3Metsl connector plates must be installed in pairs on opposite faces of truss members connected by plates. 'For metal plates rated by the senii•net area method. the end distance of I%, inch, measured parallel to grain. must be excluded when determtng the metal plate for each member ofa, joint. See Figure 2 for cnamples of joints affected by the mandatory coverage reduction of plate coverage. Load W Load Load AE Orientation EE Orientation FIGURE 1—PLATE ORIENTATIONS Load r oyc r vs E.R.- 5352' t r For SI: I inch - 23.4 Trim. , FIGURE 2—END DISTANCE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEMI -NET AREA METHOD TABLE 2—ALLOWABLE TENSION VALUES AND TENSION EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR'THE WAVE" METAL CONNECTOR PLATEI DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE 0• 00• 0• a0` Allowable Tension Load PLATE MODEL - (pounds per linter Inch per poM of plateal Tension Load Erne ieney Ratio WAVE$49 0 i 1^_ 0 »b6 For SI: 1 psi - 6.89 kPa. 'See Figure 3 for a description of plate oricn=ian. ''The length of plate refers to the dimension ci :hc longitudinal axis ofthe area of the plate from which the plate teeth were sheared during ;laic t'abncation. : Length Width , Load _ _ _ _ Load Load f r- i (a) 0° Plate Orientation (b) 90e Plate Orlentadon FIGURE 3—PLATE LENGTH AND WIDTH FOR TENSION ORIENTATION Load ' TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES AND SHEAR EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVE' METAL CONNECTOR PLATE DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH. RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE PLATE 0• 1 30• 60• 1 9o• '` 120• 1'50• 0• 30• 60• 1 90• 1 120° 1 150• MODEL Allowable Shur Load (pounds per linear inch per pW of plotlia) Shur load EMlcwncy Ratio WAVE 636 1 S61 j 469 1 567 529 1 : `6 0.563 0.7?9 I 0.332 1 5 I 6 » 570 -4 For SI: I psi - 6.S9 LPa. Page 5 of 5 ER-5352 TABLE 4—ALLOWABLE LATERAL LOAD ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, OR, FOR THE WAVE ` METAL CONNECTOR PLATE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM 16-INCH-DIAMETER SINGLE -PASS ROLLER PRESSES PLATE MODEL LUMBER SPECIES SPECIFIC GRAVITY1 DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE AA EA AE EE WAVE " 0.49 0.815 0.885 0.815 0.885 0.50 0.870 0.905 0.870 0.905 For 51: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. 'The QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.49 applies to ail wood species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.49 or lower. and the QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.50 applies to all lumber species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.50 or higher. 0 E' FIGURE 4—HEEL JOINTS TO WHICH THE REDUCTION FACTOR, HR, APPLIES cm Plate Length Plate Width F 0.25 in (6.75 nn) o.c. between slots 1 0.12 in nn) \ slot width 1 in (25.4 nn) O.C. 0.5 in (12.7 nn) between Slots uFfset between slut length adjacent slots 0.06 in (1.52 nn) PLATE AVAILABLE IN INCREMENTS OF I IN (25.4 mri). For SI: -I inch = 25.4 mm. FIGURE 5—WAVE PLATE" DIMENSIONS 0.0756 in (nininun) EST/FME,Inc. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS .& CONSULTANTS PLAN CHECK REPLY PROJECT: Rancho Santana DATE September 16, 2004 Desert Elite PROJECT NO: 4428 CLIENT N.O. Plan Check by: John W. Thompson, PE FILE NO. PC091604 Date Checked: August 27, 2004 Plan Check No.:04-5857 - 1st Check PAGE NO. 1 OF 1 "Rancho Item No.: Santana" Rely Structural Corrections PLAN 1 , 1 Roof plan has been identified- ori framing plans. 2 Roof trusses have been identified on the framing plan. PLAN 2 1. A pad has been added to the right of bedroom 2 / Front of den. 2 Roof plan has. been identified on framing plans. . 3 Roof trusses have been identified on the framing plan. .4 Only the (2)-12' walls have been used in the design and detailed accordingly.. The -wall rear of bath 3 has been added for enhancement only. PLAN 3 r 1- Footing and anchor bolt spacing have been added. 2 Roof plan -has been identified on framing plans. 3 Roof. trusses -have been identified on -the framing plan. 4 .All red. marked areas have been revised on the plans, and the following page.. 5 Calculation revised to reflect.W.C.D.F. #1 CASITA . 1 Calculations to be provided by the truss engineer. 2 Please review sheet 10.of the calculations for the Hardy Panel calculation. GENERAL 1. Soil report to be submitted by the developer. 2 Detail -11/SD1 has been added to the framing plans. 3 Engineer of record has wet -signed the structural plans. 4 Note regardinq structural observation has been added to the framing plans E S I / Copies To: Structur �. (3) Len Nobel �yc By: h�Q �� P.O. Box 16606 m Irvine, CA 92623 �qr RU svP ,.P QUINTA c P BUILDING & S,4FE7�, DEPT FOF CAUF� Ramon R. Wong -, 1 1 , , S. E. 2345 , FD APPROVED F OCT 27 2Mk CONSTRUCTION. Prepared By: Amy.Kilcline SAT ----_ BY. 1800 E. 16th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 835-2800 Fax F S t. EM I ESI/FME.', Inc. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 'PLEN.U*M, F 97 -SEE SHEET 4' — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - -- SPREAD TRUSSES & LADDER FRAME —1 024"'oc FOR 30" SQ: ATTIC ACCESS L ��91 SO;FFIT/ L _j ENTRI 10'CL'G V POWD.:. 10' C'L'G 7/11,77, 77 7'.6" SOFFIT. 4x8 -HDR. 4x8 HDR. Om 4- iv( x S �DD 2 +XO (8 HDR. 4x8 BM. ill 0 ((AI USE (1) SIMPSON 4 4 Sheet Date J N. KITPHEN 10' CL"G El m< t .0 NOOK: 10" WG 3 TO):1 PLATE SPLICE LAUND19 0 L'-G; 2x..'6 VALL.-]� SD11.1 L=l V-4" a. 3x'..SI.LL `NgpECTION A \ y !ANO, ORE (12'.' JmdA TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION, INC. dba GENERAL TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY 105 SE 124TH AVENUE VANCOUVER, WA 98684 We are an inspection agency recognized by the International Conference of Building Officials. Council of American Building Officials NER — QA275 This�is to -verify -that: SPATES FABRICATORS, INC 85-435 . MIDDLETON STREET THERMAL, CA 92274 is under our Audited Quality Control Program and has been since: JUNE, 1990 We audit the production Quarterly under the Uniform Building Code . Section 2304.4.4. TONY LEWIN MANAGER OF WESTERN TRUSS DIVISION ,-S REPORTT"' ER-5352 Reissued July 1, 2001 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. e, 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 a www.icboes.org Filing Category: DESIGN -Wood (038) WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATE FOR WOOD TRUSSES ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC. 1950 MARLEY DRIVE HAINES CITY, FLORIDA 33844 1.0 SUBJECT WAVE Metal Connector Plate for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: The WAVE plate is a metal connector plate for wood trusses. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel in various lengths and widths and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit loads between truss wood members. Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The WAVE plate is manufactured from No. 20 gage [0.0356 inch (0.90 mm)], ASTM A 653-94 SQ, Grade 40, structural - quality steel with a hot -dipped galvanized coating designated G60. The WAVE plate has slots approximately 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) long by 0.12 inch (3.0 mm) wide that have been punched along the longitudinal axis of the plate. Each punched slot forms two opposite -facing, sharply pointed teeth protruding at right angles from the parent metal. The punched slots are spaced approximately 1/4 inch (6:4 mm) on center across the width of the plate and approximately 1 inch (25.4 mm) on cen- ter along the length of the plate, with adjacent longitudinal rows staggered 0.06 inch (1.5 mm). Connector plates are available in 1-inch (25.4 mm) increments of width and length. Minimum plate width and length are 1 inch (25.4 mm) and 2 inches (51 mm), respectively. See Figure 5 for details of plate dimensions. There are 8 teeth per square inch (1.24 teeth per square centimeter) of plate surface. The length of each tooth, includ- ing the thickness of the parent metal, is approximately 0.41 inch (10.4 mm), and the width of each tooth is approximately 0.12 inch (3.05 mm). The shank of each tooth is concave and the tip of each tooth is twisted approximately 40 degrees with respect to the plate width. 2.3 Allowable Loads: Tables 1, 2 and 3 show allowable lateral loads, tension loads and shear loads for the WAVE metal plate connectors. Also, refer to Figures 1, 2 and 3 for load conditions. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSlfrPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed to transfer the required load without exceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, as determined by species, the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and the direction of load relative to grain. Design for lateral resistance must be in accordance with Section 11.2.1 ofANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 1 shows allowable lateral loads for the metal connector plates. 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the metal connector plate relative to the direction of the load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads (in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connector plates, based on the net section of the metal connector plates for tension joints, which is the allow- able tensile stress of the metal multiplied by the metal con- nector plate tensile effectiveness ratio. 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. The net section of the metal connector plates for heel joints and otherjoints involving shear must be designed using the allowable "shear values (shown in Table 3. in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connec- tor plates,.which is the allowable shear stress of the metal multiplied by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in Table 3. 2.3.4 Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable -load re- duction factors forthe metal plates must be considered cumu- latively, when applicable, in the design of metal connector plates used in fabricated wood trusses. The reduction factors to be considered cumulatively are as follows: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by a strength reduction factor, OR, shown in Table 4, when the plates are installed in lumber with a single -pass, full -embedment roller sys- tem having minimum roller diameters equal to 18 inches (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embedment hydraulic -platen presses, multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic-plat- en presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller. When trusses are fabricated with single -pass roller press- es, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the mini- mum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength -reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members. 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the WAVE metal connector plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 percent at the time of truss fabrication. REPORTS ,,e r,ul to he consented is representing uesthehirs or unv other attributer not specyicullr uddrersrd new are rher ru he cunstrued us un cndurcemrnr ul the subject nl the report or a recommendation Jor its use. There is no rrnrrrnur hr ed. nC80 £h ret hev Jc,ru'c, lnc., express or rrnpbrd..rs m unc tirrduh_4 ur other mutter or thu ,epun. or as' to um. producl c•uvered hr 'he ,•spurt. Copyright f: 2001 Page 1 of 5 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for WAVE metal con- nector plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated wood truss must be reduced by the heel -joint reduction factor, HR, as follows: HR = 0.85 - 0.05 (12 tan 6 - 2.0) where: 0.65 :5 HR <_ 0.85 6 = angle between lines of action of the top and bottom chords shown in Figure 4. This heel -joint reduction factor does not apply to conditions with top chord slopes greater than 12:12. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each WAVE metal connector plate must be designed for combined shear and tension capacity, based on the orientation of the metal con- nector plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for combined shear and tension must be in accordance with Sec- tion 11.2.4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Metal con- nector plates designed only for axial forces are permitted as splices in the top and bottom chord located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment. Design of metal connector plates located at splices in the top and bot- tom chord not located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calcu- lated point of zero moment must include combined flexure and axial stresses. 2.4 Truss Design: Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. The truss design must show compliance with the code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads for the metal connector plates may be increased for duration of load in accordance with Section 2335.5 of the code. Cal- culations need to specify the deflection ratio or the maximum deflection for live and total load. For each truss design draw- ing, the following information, at a minimum, should be speci- fied by the design engineer: 1. Truss slope or depth, span and spacing. 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of metal connector plates at each joint. 4. Truss chord and web lumber size, species and grade. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loads, concentrated loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- quake loads. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TPI 1-1995 and any adjustments to lumber -and -metal -connector -plate al- lowable values for conditions of use. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: - Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- cator who has an approved quality assurance program cover- ing the wood truss manufacturing and inspection process in accordance with Sections 2343.7 and 2343.8 of the code and Section 4 of ANSIfTPI 1-1995, National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction. The allow- able loads recognized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneu- A matic embedment presses: multiple roller presses that use a partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers: com- binations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic or pneumatic presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press: or, if the adjustment factors given in Table 4 are used, single. ' pass roller presses. When truss fabricators use single -pass roller presses, the rollers must have minimum 18-inch (457 mm) diameters. Plates embedded with a single -pass, full -embedment roller press must be preset before passing through the roller press by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a hammer. _ 2.6 Identification: Each WAVE metal connector plate is embossed with the iden- tifying mark "WAVE" stamped into the parent metal. 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Test data in accordance with National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 4.0 FINDINGS , That the WAVE metal connector plate for wood trusses complies with the 1997 Uniform Building Code', subject ' to the following conditions: 4.1 For the trusses using metal connector plates de- scribed in this report, plans and calculations must be submitted to the building official. ' 4.2 The metal connector plates are designed to trans- fer the required loads In accordance with the de- sign formulae in ANSIfTPI 1-1995. A copy of the , ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when this is requested by the building official. 4.3 The allowable loads for the metal connector plates must comply with this evaluation report. 4.4 Teeth of metal connector plates placed in knots, bark, pitch pockets, holes, and joint gaps are con- sidered ineffective. 4.5 Metal connector plates are installed in pairs on op- posite faces of truss members connected by the plates. 4.6 Trusses using metal connector plates described in ' this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator approved by the building official in accordance 4.7 with Sections 2311.6 and 2343.8 of the code. Allowable loads shown in the tables In this report , may be increased for duration of load In accord- ance with Section 2335.5 of the code. 4.8 Application of the allowable loads (shown in the tables in this report) for metal connectorplates am - bedded in lumber treated with fire -resistive chemi- cals is outside the scope of this report. 4.9 Where one -hour fire -resistive rating is required for trusses using WAVE connectors, see evaluation re- ' ports ER-1632 and ER-5640. This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ' L� 1 E.• 5352 ill IR" In„ AL ur' For S1: I inch - I5.4 mm. FIGURE 2—END DISTANCE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEMI -NET AREA METHOD 1 TABLE 2—ALLOWABLE TENSION VALUES AND TENSION EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATEI DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH 5 PLATE t I Allowable Tanaitln Loetl. PLATE MODEL —.-__ (pounds per, linear Inch per pair of plaits) Tension Load, Efnciency Ratio — V.O7 Aril. . 'See Figure 3 for a description of pL:tc oricn:3ti i. 'The length of plane refers to the dimens; �r, cf :!;c 'or.g;ridina! axis of the area of the plate from which the plate teeth were sheared d;n,ni: ; Iutc fabrication. Load F Lonc;th e I Load Load Width 4 r'- . r: n , �II a MUM Load a) 0" Plate Orientation (b) 90' Plate Orientation FIGURE 3—PLATE LENGTH AND WIDTH FOR TENSION ORIENTATION TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES AND SHEAR EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVEMETAL CONNECTOR PLATE DIRECTION of LOkO WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT IC ',.ENGTH CF PLATE PLATE 0• )0• 6C; 90• 170 1S0• a- )0' 00' 90• j t'a'U' I ISO, MODEL Allowable Shave Lud Ipovno, per linear Inch per pair of plate*) Shaer LOW EMuency Ratic yAVE' 656 1 561 i---_'b _1 567 •]9 r6 0.:63 Oa TO .+•• . yar — ❑.d7 Ara. �..._..---........ _.._..__....__.._._. _.._._.. ER-5352 TABLE 1—ALLOWABLE LATERAL RESISTANCE VALUES FOR THE WAVE" METAL CONNECTOR PLATE' , t'Mhtj^`t•`'-'� �'^ DIRECTION Of GRAINANO LOAD WITH - .-•' 'i7':>,...... -- - •----_._.-._.�__.. �.�_:... ,. .. _ .. TU LENG•TMOf PLATE7.3 PLATE MODEL AA EA AE EE speues �- - 9nedfic Gra.lry---- Allowable low Per VINa —--------- 1POYnds per square Inch or plate contact srssh - NIET:AI. PLATE VALUES RATED Bl' GROSS AREA METHOD -- -- Douglas f:: . 0 9 206 156 ;i5 I 153 Hem -fir 109 106 I Southern p :nC --- - 0.... ... I 206 158 120 16: I10 WAVE` Spruce-pine-lit-`__v('—_ 139 109 106 118 MET�.L ?)_ATE VALUES RATED BY SEMI -NET AREA METHOD' Douglas til ; U.49 275 _— 193 I�5 Hem -fir 0.43 208 53 I53 134 i 06 124 Southern pine 0.55 27S 195 163 170 Spruce -pine - fir 1 0.42 208 130 ;06 For SI: I inch = 25.4 mm. I psi - 6.89 kPa. 118 'See Figure I for a description of plate orientation. 'The tabulated values are for a single plate. The values are doubled for plates installed on both faces of a joint if area is cal. ulated for a single plate. 310lenl connector plates must be installed In pairs on opposite faces of truss members connected by plates. 'For metal plates rated by the semi -net area method. the end distance of ;? inch, measured to , parallel grain. must be excluded when determine the metal for each member of a joint. See Figure 2 for examples ofjolnts affected by the mandatory reduction plate cove rage of plate coveraec. L Load Load Load AA Orientation EA Orientation LOod Load _— IIII11 — — — 111111 Load Load AE Orientation EE Orientation ' FIGURE i—PLATE ORIENTATIONS , I I I I I I► I I I I I I' 'I-II'�,I I_ I�I:.I I I I I I fill II111111 '•:fll.l'I Page 5 of 5 .. _... _ ,. _ ..... - ER-5352 ,,_,TABLE 47-ALLO..WABLE LATERAL LOAD ADJUSTMENT, FACTOR,. OR., FOR-THEWAVE- METAL- CONNECT OR,PLATE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM 18-INCH-DIAMETER SINGLE -PASS ROLLER PRESSES PLATE MODEL LUMBER SPECIES SPECIFIC GRAVITY DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE AA EA AE EE WAVE 0.49 0.815 0.885 0.815 0.885 0.50 0.870 0.905 0.870 10.905 ror JC I mcn = 1.).4 mm. - 'The QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.49 applies to all wood species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.49 or lower. and the QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.50 applies to all lumber species combinations with average pubiished specific gravity of 0.50 or higher. 0 E) fig_} FIGURE 4-HEEL JOINTS TO WHICH THE REDUCTION FACTOR, NR, APPLIES Plate Length C. Plate Width I 0.12 in width nn) \ 1 in (25.4 nn) o.c Slot width 0.5 in (12.7 nn) between slots uFfset between slut length adjocent Slots 0.06 in (1.52 nn) PLATE AVAILABLE IN INCREMENTS OF I 1N (25.4 rnrn). For SI: I inch = 25.4 mm. d 0.25 in (6.75 nn) o.c. between slots FIGURE 5--WAVE PLATE"' DIMENSIONS 0.0756 in (nininun) :.s' i'4' c J" "' •'" ti;1(. _ ,�" rf-,a�n—+t t"• �Yii"CC,+'�'=!': •�•i sd yy.��v�r'' i ">; r'`-r^'�+,�`^ y".`'� �y,,� :iri•t�.'0�r; {•. �s r]';l °+ ,t n ,. _.,-qmw. •' 4 �,��Ya9'i tixY.i ; ix,�;4*. tt r4��;r A t L11•'�T.'+4•rt,.'w..•4}Yie%�tf r 3'1 s �,'✓�j, ir••�i, .,.f','S�'t"�•, •9+.,.{" - rYvy .f1,.. ♦ ' {!v .�i., -!5 'r ,s_� � �. �� f't., YTr� x ,K pp ♦ , .�.. i Y ( � t �,{ `�'. ltl � •� l 'i �i ,�.y? ;�., a T b - �€ y .'s r' Ir• r 'i � �� sy ,,� � ,, � 1 �-r �^' } !rr^�+��,,,r /l��• ' C� � �7' ; � s e � ' � � � 'b i • �Y h., ' ', t e}y' EV41, fa ,, t�Fr ? �g h-.. 5 { ;�tA .�.H; �.,,+. - .{.•�t. r �"ta;��.rt '�.; `�'� , . TERRY*ENGINEERIIVG�� '' �` - •'., it 1 i i. , ". l . , . } , t t r t ,a f 1 • ' 4 ty a ,. r t. t�; }r het t f' �. + - , " �' � R• �� y % 1 • i rvrCi'.ti .. � it �� al 1.2 CI-Ty.-TyOF LA QUINTq ,. h _ BUILDING -& SAFETY,,DEPT ' I FOR CON TI x STRU t �• ON p• �1 � s• s � �l�' gip ' 180 E: MAIN STREET, SUITE 150, TUSTINI, CA 9 ik RHONE 71' -8' 8 1124 FAX 71'4.-838 14064. webr�wwwterryengineenng com •',e mail .rinfoCterryengineering com Y�.rtf to��y4 4� ,9' � t k ,7. ,. aM ry' q ,� • r '�a �''{'ri;� s' 7 '� `� . ,<t r �{ . -1' - •, 1 . �j L.}y,� � �. t 4 ��Ji '. ''y may. S`4+ aF ra ,. 4 4 ..,4+�,.�. yj - iscir,Y {My dF tM 1 { .; xsv {�.' ,p�yi t iC' € p�••+ .��*t .y�"+' .3 ty;! yIM®�/p ® ? Y i.. _i -. f -,�,_ .� t".3.'. �'. .✓ j r"Al3xKkd.6 .�.d. �r,4-•t'..t' sl �� •..c ] .? 4i a "�� TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANCHED SANTANA PLANI TRACr.31202 ILA QJINTA JOB NUMBER 040301 1. - BUILDING SMIEW 2. - GAZING SUET W 3. CF-lR - OaAPLIANCE S"MEMENT 4. C-2R - BUILDING DESIGN 5. FORM 3R - CALMATION OF HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS 6. FORM 4R - HEATIM LOAD CALCULATTON 7. FORM SR - COMING LOAD CALMLATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WnWWS 8. EON 6R - COOLUG 100 CALCULATION BASED ON NO ERAPES BUILDING SUMMARY RANCCHD SANIANk PLANT, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040301 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: i. NEW EXr WALL R13 . NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATITC CEILING R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERIMETER INSULATION NC (LASS FILE NUMBER 28 PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS 024FIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CLASS T4ROiJQ-%7ITT . EQUIR7EW SIZING REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONIRACIUR TO MEET ME FOLLOWING REQUIREMRSTIS:. 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIM<m BUILDIIG HEAT= LOAD OF 36116 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWIM: FURNACE AFUE = 80.00% AIR C[k]DITICNER SEER = 10.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.61. WATER HEATER BLANKET = R-0 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SE ECTICNS: TERRY ENGINEER G IS NOT RESPONSIBI FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELDCITON; IMZEFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE FOLLOWIM SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. , EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE MODEL BIU/HP FURIIIICE 1 (1) BR)OM 311JAV060090 89000 EACH DQUmoa QTY MAID; MODEL TONS AIR COtMITTONER 1 (1) BR= 561CO60-A 5.0 EQUIPMENT QI'Y MAKE MODEL G1LLCNS BLANKET WATER HEATER •(1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS: CCMPL.IANC£ IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PEPM WNCR ANALYSIS M211m. NORTH FACING RESULT = 30.52 EAST EACIIG RESULT = 31.55 SOUTH FACING RESULT = 29.82 WEST FACQ]G RESULT = 30.70 WORST CASE RESULT = 31.55 BUDGET = 31.61 , W14 ORIFNIATION WIDTH HEIGHT 1 FRONT 3.00 8.00 2 FRONT 1.67 7.00 3 FRONT 6.00 5.00 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 5 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 6 REAR 5.00 5.00 7 REAR 8.00 5.00 8 REAR 8.00 1.50 9 REAR 8.00 5.00 10 REAR 8.00 1.50 11 REAR 6.00 5.00 12 REAR 6.00 1.50 13 LEFT 2.00 6.50. 14 7£t'T 2.00 6.50 15 LEFT 6.00 5.00 16 RIGHT REAR 2.50 8.00 17 RIGHT REAR 2.50 8.00 18 LEFT 3.00 8.00 19 FRCNr 6.00 5.00 20 FRONT 3.00 8.00 GLASS SUMMARY RANCHO SANTAANA PLAN1, TRACT 31202 JOB NU4ER 040301 1 u• •ar •ar •ar •ar •ar -ar •ar •ar •ar •ar •ar •ar • ac i •ar • a '• H Doe •ar a • H pool U-VALUE 0.58 NJNE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NaNE 0.60 NCNE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.60 NCNE 0.58 NONE 0.58 NONE 0.58 NONE 0.60 NONE 0.58 NONE ••a 1 H 1 `1P11 1119a MIJa �17�/. t. ERTIFICATE-OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R Project Title. .. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 �'bate;..09/17/04 11 25 26 roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... 2130 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Stories.......... 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage......... 21.5 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.36 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft "omponent Frame Type Type ------------ Roof ------- nta all n/a all n/a Door n/a labEdge n/a olabEdge n/a Orientation -------------------- Door Front (N) Window Front (N) Window Front (N) Window Right (W) Window Right (W) Window Back (S) Window Back (S) BUILDING SHELL INSULATION ------------------------- Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly R-value R-value R-value U-factor -------- R-30. -------- R-n/a ------- R-30 ------- 0.035 R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083 R-0 R-n/a R-0 0.330 R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720 R-0 R-n/a F2=0.550 FENESTRATION Area U- (sf) Factor SHGC ----- 24.0 ------ ------ 0.370 0.360 11.7 0.360 0.350 30.0 0.400 0.360 25.0 0.400 0.360 25.0 0.400 0.360 25.0 0.400 0.360 40.0 0.360 0.350 Location/Comments New Attic Ceil New Ext Wall New Gypboard W Exterior Door Interior Door Covered At Garage Interior Shading --------------- Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Over - Exterior hang/ Shading Fins ----- -------------- Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 'Date<..09/17/04 11:25:26 ------------------------------------------------------ -- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FENESTRATION ------------ Area U- Interior Orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading -------------------- Window Back (S) ----- 12.0 ------ 0.4b0 ------ 0.360 --------------- Standard Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Window Back (S) 30.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Window Left (E) 13.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Window Left (E) 13.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Door Back (SW) 20.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Door Back (SW) 20.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Window Front (N) 30.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Door -*Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.360 Standard, SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2130 Over - Exterior hang/ Shading Fins Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant Tested ACCA Equipment Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual .Type Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D ----------- urnace ------------ 0.800 AFUE ------------------ n/a Attic ------- R-4.2 ------- 'No ------ No ,,,CSplit 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS. --------------------- Number Tank in Energy Size Tank Type -- - - - - - - - - - Heater Type ------ - - - - -- Distribution Type ------------- - - - - -- System - - - - Factor -- - - - - -- (gal) - - - - - - Storage Gas Standard -- 1 .61 50 Thermostat Type SetBack SetBack External Insulation R-value R- n/a is 1 ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 -DA1e;..09/17/04 11.25:26 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-50403010 Wth-CTZ1OS92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -.RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. This printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS Q ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 4 CF-1R ---------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 *Date— 09/17/04 11.25:26 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F V)777-9920 A CA 92253 Phone... ( License. Signed.. (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed. (date) DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry Engineering Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 Tustin, CA 92680 Phone... (714) 838-1124 Signed.. Q-(7-U0 T (date) OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLANT rDate:..09/17/04 11:25:26 roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- ---------------------------- MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed .Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 8.58 6.61 1.97 _ = Space Cooling.......... 10.49 13.11 -2.62 = = Water Heating.......... 12.54 10.80 1.74 = = North Total 31.61 30.52 1.09 = = Space Heating.......... 8.58 7.22 1.36 = = Space Cooling.......... 10.49 13.53 -3.04 = = Water Heating.......... 12.54 10.80 1.74 = = East Total 31.61 31.55 0.06 = = Space Heating.......... 8.58 7.47 1.11 = = Space 'Cooling .......... 10.49 11.55 -1.06 = = Water 1. Heating.......... 12.54 10.80 1.74. _ = South Total 31.61 29.82 1.79 = = Space Heating.......... 8.58 6.95 1.63 = = Space Cooling.......... 10.49 12.95 -2.46 = = Water Heating........... 12.54 10.80 1.74 _ = West Total 31.61 30.70 0.91 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** _ OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R Project Title ... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date 09/17/Q4 11:25 26 ------------------------------------------ -- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area..... 2130 sf Building Type.......... Single Family Detached Construction Type New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... ReducedYear Floor Construction Type..... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume.....:.. Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... one Type -------------- TJOUS E Residence Surface OUSE 1 Roof 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Wall 6 Wall 7 Wall 8 Door 9 Door Slab On Grade 1 21300 cf 2130 sf 21.5 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.36 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor ------------------------- # of Vent Vent Air Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) (sf) Credit' 2130 21300 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES Area U- --------------- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ (sf) factor R-val Azm Tilt Gains Reference Comments 2130 0.035 30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic Ceil 412 0.088 13 180 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 18 0.088 13 225 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 342 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 200 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 355 0.088 13 90 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 310 0.083 13 0 90 No None New Gypboard W 20 0.330 0 0 90 Yes None Exterior Door 21 0.330 0 0 90 No None Interior Door :OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 T`Date�..09/17/04 11:25:26 -------------------------------------------------- --- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Length F2 Insul Solar Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Location/Comments HOUSE 10 SlabEdge 180 0.720 R-0 No Covered 11 SlabEdge 31 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES Area U- Act ,rientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt --------------------- HOUSE ----- ----- ----- --- ---- 1 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.37010.360 0 90 2 Window Front (N) 11.7 0.360 0.350 0 90 3 Window Front (N) 30.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 4 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 5 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 6 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 7 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 8 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 9 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 10 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 11 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 2 Window Back (S) .9.0 0:400 0.360 180 90 _3 Window Left (E) 13.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 14 Window Left (E) 13.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 5 Window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 6 Door Back (SW) 20.0 0.370 0.360 225 90 17 Door Back (SW) 20.0 0.370 0.360 225 90 '8 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.360 90 90 9 Window Front (N) 30.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 z0 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.360 0 90 SLAB SURFACES Exterior Shade Interior Shade Type/SHGC Type/SHGC ---------------------------- Standard/0.7.6 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Area Slab Type (sf) ---------------- ------ HOUSE - Standard Slab 2130 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R ----------------------------------------------- ---------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 `Date,..09/17/04 11:25:26 ---------------------------------------- --- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403010 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Type OUSE Furnace ACSplit Tank Type ------------ 1 Storage HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant Tested ACCA Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Eff ------------------------------------------------------- ---- 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No R-4.2 No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS --------------------- Number in Energy Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor ----------- --------- - --------- ------ -------- Gas Standard 1 .61 No 0.753 No 0.674 Tank External Size Insulation (gal) R-value ------ 50 ---------- R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** items in thi?'s section should be documented on the plans,' *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** •i•his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. This printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS . 040301 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS FORM 3 R HEAT TRANSFER ODEFFICIENT PROPOSED ODWM=CN ASSFrIDLY PRLI7ECT RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY IA QUANTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF OITCN CCMPCNENIS R C24SIRUCTION ASSEMBLY New Ext Wall ' 1 R13 Standard Wall (16oc) 11.360. 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 n_ 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER OOEFFICIENT (U 0.088 BTU/(HR.M. OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.088 BTU/(HR.FI2.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 LIST OF ITCN COMPONENTS R Q'kISIRI CN ASSEMBLY New Gypbcard Wall 1 5/8 In. GypUoard 0.500 2 R13 Wall (2x4 16oc) 9.760 3 1/2 In. Gypboard 0.450 4 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5' Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 ' 0 . TOTAL TTIEUIAL RESISTANCE (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL FEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 BTU/ (HR.FI2.OF) U OORRECTED WITH ERAhIIM FACTOR 1 0.083 BTU/ (HR. FT2.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF 0XJST=CN COMPONENTS R C3VIRUCTICN ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling 1 R30•Standa_rd Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER C)EFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTU/ (HR.FI2.OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRA4M FACTOR 1 0.035 BTU/(HR.FI2.OF) 040301 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION F 0 R M 4 R PRG= RANCHO SANTANA PLANT LOCATION TRACT 31202 a. i CITY LA UnNIA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TEDIPERATURE DIFFERENCE FOR ALL C0NDITIONS OTHER THAN THE FOLLOWING: 70 - 32 ME 1. 38 FOR INSULATED FLCAR OVER VENDED MOVW SPACE T,'rntF 1/2 T 2. = 19 FOR UNIIZ II TED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE LINE 2 - 5 F LM�E 3. = 14 CONDUCTIVE HEAT LOSS AREA, FT 2 OR U FRCM FURM TW FROM DESCRIPTION OF ASSaMY LS•pm, FT. 3,TABLE 4-1 LOAD GLASS R DOUELE PANE 168.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 3830.4 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 50.00" X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1140.0 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 71.69 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1634.5 BTU/HR CLASS L DOUBLE PANE 56.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1276.8 BTU/HR GLASS RZ DOUBLE PANE 40.Od X 0.580 X 38.00 = 881.6 BTU/HR GLASS F DOME PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 1057.9 BTU/HR GLASS L DOlIDLE PANE 24.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 529.0 BTU/HR EXTERIOR DOOR 20.01 X 0.330 X 38.00 = 250.9 BTU/HR INTERIOR DOOR 21.36 X 0.330 X 14.00 = 98.7 BIU/HR New Ect Wall 1326.50 X 0.088 X 38.00 = 4437.2 BTU/HR New Gypboard Wall 310.00 X 0.083 X 38.00 = 976.0 BTU/HR New Attic Ceiling 2130.00 X 0.035 X 38.00 = 2833.0 STU/HR Carpet W/ Rubber Pad 0.00 X 18.201 X 1.00 = 3283.9 BTU/HR Perimeter At Garage (R7 Equiv) 0:00 X 13.046 X 1.00 = 404.4 BTU/HP SUBTDM 4 = 22634.4 BTU/HR INFIL0IZATI0N (ENTER 0 ON 1 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VENLTLATION) 2130.0 FT2 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 38.0 OF T,TNF 5 = 10198.4 BIU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA WEIGHTED AVG. CEILING HEIGHT I FRCM TABLE 3-7 DIW FRCM LANE SUBTOTAL 7 = 32832.8 BTU/HR DUCT HEAT LOSS (ENTER 0 ON LINE 8 IF THERE ARE NO DUM) 0.10 X LINE 7 LINE 8 = 3283.3 BTU/HR TO T A L (LINE 7+ 8) LINE 9= 36116.1 BTU/HR 040301 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 5 R ASHRAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOTS LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS PROJECT RANCEBJ SANTANA PLAN1 . IOCATICN TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUIIJPA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 SU4-1ER OUTSIDE TENMZATURE MINUS INSIDE TE4PERATLTRE 102 = 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY .AREA ASHRAE TD LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 168.00 X 20.00 50.00 28.00 1 50.00 = 3.36 3.36 4.70 8.40 MBH GLASS RR DOUBLE PANE 40.00 X 35.00 43.00 43.00 35.00 = 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.40 I'M GLASS Rt DOUKE PANE 50.00 X 50.00 28.00 50.00 20.00 = 2.50 2.50 2.50 1.00 MEH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 119.69 X 28.00 50.00 20.00 50.00 = 3.35 3.35 2.39 5.98 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 80.00 X 50.00 20.00 50.00 28.00 = 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.24 DM DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VAUIE ASHRAE TD LOAD DOOR 21.01 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.20 MSH INTERIOR DOOR- 21.36 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.20 MEH New Ext Wall 1326.50 X 0.086 X 28.60 = 3.34 MBH New Gypboard Wall 310.00 X 0.083 X 28.60 = 0.73 MEH New Attic Ceiling 2130.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 = 3.65 MESH SUBTOTAL = 27.23 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS 27.23167 X .10 = 4.34 MEH INFILTRATION 21300.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 6.21 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 4 X 225 _ 0.90 MBH KITCHEN EQUIRiMU LOAD - = 1.20 MBH TOM SENSIBLE LOAD - S = 35.38 MBH W = 39.88 MBH N = 36.09 MIDH E = 39.80 MBH GRAND TOM LOAD S = 51.50 MID W = 58.04 M13H N = 52.53 MEH E = 57.92 MBH MAXIK]M TONS S = 4.29 'BONS W = 4.84 TCM N = 4.38 TONS E = 4.83 TONS 040301 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 6 R. ASHRAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOLMU LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES r PRO= RANCHO SAND PLANT LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 SLMIER OUTSIDE TEWERATURE MINUS INSIDE TEMPERATURE. 102 - 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASIUM TO LOAD SQ ET S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 168.00 X 27.00 76.00 41.00 76.00 = 4.54 4.54 6.89. 12.77 MSH GLASS RR DOUBLE PANE 40.00 X 54.00 67.00 67.00 54.00 = 2.16 2.16 2.68 2.16 MBH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 50.00 X 76.00 41.00 76.00 27.00 = 3.80 3.80 3.80 1.35 MBH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 119.69 X 41.00 76.00 27.00 76.00 = 4.91 4.91 3.23 9.10 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 80.00 X 76.00 27.00 76.00 41.00 = 6.08 6.08 6.08 3.28 MBH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 21.01 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.20 MBH INTERIOR DOOR ' 21.36 X 0.330 X 28.60 _ 0.20 MBH New Ext Wall 1326.50 X 0.088 X 28.60 = 3.34 MBH New Gypboard Wall 310.00 X 0.083 X. 28.60 = 0.73 MBH New Attic Ceiling 2130.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 = 3.65 MBH SURICITAL = 36.88 MBE DUCT HEAT LOSS 36.88161 X .10 = 5.87 MEH . INFILTRATION 21300.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 6.21 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 4 X 225 = 0.90 MSH KITO-I N EQUIR4OC LOAD _ - _ 1.20 MSH TOTAL, SIISSIBLE; LOAD S = 43.79 MBH W = 51.06 MBH N = 44.99 MBH E = 50.96 MBH GRAND 'TOTAL LOAD S = 63.74 MBH W = 74.32 MBH N = 65.48 MEH E = 74.17 MBH MAXIMUM TONS S = 5.31 TONS W = 6.19 TONS N = 5.46 TONS E- 6.18 TONS .TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANCRD SANIANA PLAM TRACT 31202 LA QU= JOB NLNBER 040302 1 BUILD= SLY44Uff 2. GLAZIbE SL14qM 3. CF-lR Cd�7PLIANCE SIMIEMENr 4. C-2R BUILDIM DESIGN 5. FORM 3R - CAIOJ=CN OF HEAT MWZTER CDEFFICIENM 6. FORM 4R - IMATDC MAD CALCaMON 7. FM SR - ODOLIM LOAD GUaU=CN BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS 8. FUN 6R - COOLING LOAD CALCLUTION BASED ON NO MAPES BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANUM PLAN2, TRACT 31202 JOB NL14BER 040302 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATICN: ..`. NEW ENT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILaNG, R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERIMETER INSULATICN NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 28 PROPOSED BUILDIIO GLASS CONFIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBT £ PANE GLASS THROUGHOUT . EQJIRIENT SIZING REQUIREMENTS:. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE OONIRACIOR TO MEET THE EOLWWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HFA= CAPACITY TO MEET MINR4N BUILDING HFAATIM LOAD OF 43445 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE -AFUE = 80.00% AIR 02MITIONER SEER = 10.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.61 WATER HEATER SIAN ET = R-0 3. MUM WATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE E2JI MFNT SELECTIONS: TERRY EDI3n=znG IS NOT RESFOMISIBLB FOR THE =Pma4r SEUk: cN; THEREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED CN DESIGN CRITERIA PRNIDED BY THE OWI-ER: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE FOLLOWIIO SELECTICNS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. =PmNT QTY MAKE MODEL BTU/HR FURNACE 1 (2) BRYPNT •311JAV036040 35000 EACH DQU.TLP�3JT QIY MAKE MODEL TCNS AIR CONDITICN R 1 (2) BRYPNT 561CO36-A 3.0 EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE MODEL GALLONS BIAbU= WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS:. CIAPLSANCE IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PERFORK*xE ANALYSIS METHOD. NORTH FACIM RESULT = 29.22 EAST F4ICTMM RESULT = 29.64 SOUTH PACIM RESULT = 29.08 WEST FPCIIO RESULT = 28.57 WORST CASE RESULT = 29.64 BUDGET = 29.71 r NUM ORIENIATICIN WIDTH HEIGHT 1 Firm 5.00 1.50 2. FRONP 5.00 5.00 3 FRCNr 5.00 1.50 4 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 5 FRCNr 3.00 5.00 6 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 7 FRONT 1.17 7.00 8 FRONT 1.17 7.00 9 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 10 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 11 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 12 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 13 REAR 8.00 1.50 14 REAR 8.00 5.00 15 REAR 8.00 1.50 16 REAR 8.00 5_00 17 LEFT 2.50 8.00 18 REAR 8.00 1.50 19 REAR 8.00 5.00 20 LEFT 3.00 1.50 21 LEFT 3.00 5.00 22 LEFT 3.00 1.50 23 LEFT 3.00 5.00 24 LEFT 2.00 4.00 25 LEFT 5.00 5.00 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 27 LEFT 2.00 4.00 28 LEFT REAR 3.00 8.00 29 LEFT REAR 3.00 8.00 30 FRONT 5.00 5.00 GLASS SUMMARY RAND SANTANA PLAN, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 640302 . `'FRANftNG ' .. WINDOW TYPE U-VALLE MATERIAIli OPENING TYPE GLAZING SHADING .TYPE DEVICE REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NF4 SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REXX AR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIRED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL FRENCH LASS DOOR 0.58 - METAL SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL RET'ULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REXXAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NF]E SLIDER DUAL RETGAAR 0.60 NNE FI7)4.•D DUAL FRENCH CLASS DOOR 0.58 METAL HINGED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NNE SLSDII2 DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLUM DUAL REGULAR 0.60' NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 N3�2 SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLJffi2 DUAL ' REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL, RDGLLAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL REGULAR 0.60 N NE SLIM DUAL FRENCH CLASS DOOR 0.58 NONE HINGED DUAL FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 NONE HIN.,'ED DUAL REL;ULAR 6.60 NONE SIII)ER DUAL 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R Project Title .......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 rDate'..09/17/04 11:20:34 ,roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... 2600 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Stories.......... 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage......... 20.6 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.41 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.36 Average Ceiling Height,..... 10 ft ^omponent Frame Type Type ------------ Roof ------- n/a all n/a all n/a Door n/a labEdge n/a �labEdge n/a Orientation -------------------- Window Front (N) Window Front (N) Window Front (N) Window Right (W) Window. Front (N) Window Right (W) Window Front (N) BUILDING SHELL INSULATION ------------------------- Cavity Sheathing Total' Assembly R-value R-value R-value U-factor Location/Comments -------- R-30 -------- R-n/a ------- R-30 ------- 0.035 R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083 R-0 R-n/a R-0 0.330 R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720 R-0 R-n/a F2=0.550 FENESTRATION ------------------------ New Attic Ceil New Ext Wall New Gypboard W Exterior Door Interior Door Covered At Garage Area U- Interior (sf) Factor SHGC Shading ----- 7.5 ------ ------ 0.360 0.350 --------------- Standard 25.0 0.40.0 0.360 Standard 7.5 0.360 0.350 Standard 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard 15.0. 0.400 0.360 Standard 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard 8.2 0.360- 0.350 Standard Over- Exterior hang/ Shading -------------- Fins ----- Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None Standard None ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2-batez- 09/17/04 11:20:34 =____---------------------------------------------------- -- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -.Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FENESTRATION Over - Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ Orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- Window Front (N) ----- 8.2 ------ 0.360 ------ 0.350 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- None Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Door Right (W) 48.0 0.580 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Door Left (E) 20.0 0.580 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0..360 Standard Standard None Door Left (SE) 24.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Standard None Door Left (SE) 24.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Front '(N) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf). ---------------- ------ Standard Slab 2600 HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant Tested ACCA Equipment Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Thermostat Type Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Type . ------------ irnace ------------ 0.800 AFUE ------------------ n/a Attic ------- R-4.2 ------- No ------ No ---------- SetBack ._Split 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No SetBack 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 "Date�..09/17/04 11:20:34 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value Storage Gas Standard 1 .61 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. ;his printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS :ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 4 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 'Datez..09/17/04 11:20:34 ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering. Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When.this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER Name.. Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F Address. LA_QUINTA CA 92253 Phone... (7 )777-9920 Phone... License. lift Signed.. /a��'�; Signed.. (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. date) DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR James H. Terry Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 v (date) OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R -------------------------------------------------- ---- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 '"Dat'e',..09/17/04 11:20:34 roject Address........TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building.Permit # Terry Engineering 180. E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- ompliance Method...... MICRO-PAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- - MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating ......... 8.67 6.90 1.77 = = Space Cooling.......... 10.08 12.82 -2.74 = = Water Heating.......... 10.96 9.50 1.46 = = North Total 29.71 29.22 0.49 = = Space Heating.......... 8.67 7.31 1.36 = = Space Cooling.......... 10.08 12'.83 -2.75 = = Water Heating.......... 10.96 9.50 1.46 = = East Total 29.71 29.64 0.07 = = Space Heating.......... 8.67 7.82 0.85 = - Space Cooling.......... 10.08 11.76 -1.68 = - Water Heating.......... 10.96 9.50 1.46 = = South Total 29.71 29.08 0.63 = = Space Heating.......... 8.67 7.44 1.23 = = Space Cooling.......... 10.08 11.63 -1.55 _ Water Heating 10.96 9.50 1.46 = = West Total 29.71 28.57• 1.14 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** _ F] OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R Project Ti.tle.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date%.09/17/04 11:20:34 ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area.... 2600 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... l Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... ReducedYear Floor Construction'Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing -Percentage ......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Dne Type -------------- v'JUS E Residence Surface RUSE 1 Roof 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Wall 5 Wall 7 Wall 8 Door 9 Door Slab On Grade 1 26000 cf 2600 sf 20.6 % of floor area 0.41 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.36 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION ------------------------- Floor # of Vent Vent Air Area Volume Dwell Cond Thermostat Height Area Leakage (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) (sf) Credit 2600 26'000 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES Area U- --------------- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ (sf) ------ factor ----- R-val ----- Azm --- Tilt ---- Gains ----- Reference ------------ Comments ---------------- 2600 0.035 30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic Ceil 356 0.088 13 180 90 Yes None. New Ext Wall 592 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 233 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 552 0.088 13 90 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 17 0.088 13 135 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 230 0.083 13 0_ 90 No None New Gypboard W 24 0.330 0 0 90 Yes None Exterior Door 20 0.330.0 0 90 No None Interior Door 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date'..09/17/04 11:20:34 ---------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User4-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERIMETER LOSSES Length ---------------- F2 Insul Solar Surface =----------- (ft) Factor R-val Gains Location/Comments HOUSE ------ -------- ------- ----- ---------------------- 10 S1abEdge 231 0.720 R-0 No Covered 11 SlabEdge 23 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES Area U- Act rientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt --------------------- ----- ----- ----- --- ---- HOUSE Window Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350 0 90 ,1 2 Window Front (N) 25.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 3 Window Front (N)- 7.5 0.360 0.350 0 90. 4 Window Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 5 Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 6 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 7 Window Front (N) 8.2 0..360 0.350 0 90 8 Window Front (N) 8.2 0.360 0.350 0 90 9 Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 10 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.580 0.360 270 90 '1 Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 2 Window Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 _L3 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 14 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 5 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 6 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 17 Door Left (E) 20.0 0.580 0.350 90 90 8 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 9 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 20 Window Left (E) 4..5 0.400 0.360 90 90 ')1 Window Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.350 90 90 2 Window Left (E) 4.5 0.400 0.360 90 90 -3 Window Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.350 90 90 24 Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 5 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 6 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 27 Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 "8 Door Left (SE) 24.0 0.370 0.360 135 90 9 Door Left (SE) 24.0 0.370 0.360 135 90 _,0 Window Front (N) 25.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 Exterior Shade Type/SHGC -------------- Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76, Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Interior Shade Type/SHGC -------------- Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0,68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 'Date;..09/17/04 11:20:34 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403020 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) ---------------- ------ HOUSE Standard Slab 2600 HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant Tested ACCA System Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Type ------------ Efficiency Airflow. Location ------------------ I -----= ------- R-value ------- Leakage --------- D -------- Eff ---- HOUSE Furnace 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic R-4.2 No No 0.753 ACSplit 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No 0.674 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------------------------------------ -------------- ---------------- 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .61 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS' ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** -his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. his printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS 040302 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS FORM 3 R HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED amGn KTICN ASSEMBLY PR3JECT RANCHO SAND* A PLAN2 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA CNINNIA .. . DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE:. 05-17-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF CIJSIRUCTION C2Y4PONENIS R CY$4S`IR.TCTION ASSEMBLY New Ect Wall 1 R13.Sranda_rd Wall (16oc) 11.360 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0, TOM THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 . 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.088 BTU/ (HR.EZ2.OF) U OMIRECI£D WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.088 BTU/(HR.FI2.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 LIST OF PITON CaAPCNENIS R CONS'IRIIC CN ASSEMBLY New Gypboard Wall 1 5/8 In. Gypboard 0.500 2 R13 Wall (2x4 16oc) 9.760 3 1/2 In. Gypboaxd 0.450 4 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOT71I, THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 BTU/ (HR.M. OF) U OORRDCTE.'D WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.083 BTU/(HR.F72.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.060 LIST OF CONSTRUCTTON C TTS R 026TBUTCTTON ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTU/ (HR. FT2. OF) U OORRECIED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.035 BTU/(HR.M. OF) 040302 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 4 R PROJECT RANCED SANDUSa PEM LOCATICN TRACT 31202 . CITY LA UUINTA . DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC IN,TE: 05-17-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TF1 POZAnM DIFFERENCE - FOR ALL COIDITICNS OTHER THAN THE FOLSCWING: 70 - 32 T 1. = 38 FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED LTNH MED SPACE T. 1/2 LINE. 2. = 19 FOR UNINSULATED FLCOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE T. 2 - 5 F LINE 3. = 14 CONDUCTIVE HEAT LASS AREA, FT 2 OR U FRCM FC)RM TW FRCM - DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY LENGTH, FT. 3,TABLE 4-1 LOAD GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 156.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 3556.8 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 62.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1413.6 BIU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 96.38 X 0.600 X 38.00. = 2197.5 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 105.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 2394.0 BIU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 1057.9 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 20.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 440.8 BTU/HR GLASS LR DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 1057.9 BTU/HR EXTERIOR DOOR 24.00 X, 0.330 X 38.00 = 301.0 BIU/HR INTERIOR DOOR 20.00 X 0.330 X 14.00 = 92.4 HTU/HR New E3ct Wall 1749.02 X 0.088 X 38.00 - 5850.6 BTU/HR New GYpboard Wall 230.00 X 0.083 X 38.00 = 724.1 BTU/HIt New Attic Ceiling 2600.00 X 0.035 X 38.00 = 3458.2 BTU/HR Carpet W/ Rubber Pad 0.00 X 18.201 X 1.00 = 4201.6 STU/HR Perimeter At Garage (R7 Fquiv) 0.00 X 13.046 X 1.00 = 300.0 BTU/HR SLUMIAL 4 = 27046.4 BTU/HR INFILTRATION (ENTER 0 ON T.7TiF. 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VENTILATICN) 2600.0 FT2 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 38.0 OF T. 5 = 12448.8 BTU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA ' WEIGHTED AXG. CEILING HEIGHT I FROM TABLE 3-7 DTW FROM LINE SUBTOTAL 7 = 39495.2 BTU/HR DUCT HEAT LOSS (ENTER 0 ON LINE 8 IF THERE ARE NO DUCTS) 0.10 X T.7 LINE 8 = 3949.5 BTU/HR T O T A L (L.IIdE 7+ 8) LINE 9= 43444.7 BTU/HR 040302 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 5 R ASARAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, BUILDING C70I.IIT LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LSGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS •�, t' PROJECT RANCHO SANIANA PLAM LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 SU44ER OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE MINUS INSIDE TEMPERATURE 102 - 75' = 27 . DESCRIPITON OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TD LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 156.00 X 20.00 50.00 28.00 50.00 = 3.12 3.12 4.37 7.80 MEH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 110.00 X 50.00 28.00 50.00 20.00 = 5.50 5.50 5.50 2.20 MEH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 96.38 X 28.00 50.00 20.00 50.00 = 2.70 2.70 1.93 4.82 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 125.00 X 50.00 20.00 50.00 28.00 = 6.25 6.25 6.25 3.50 MEH GLASS LR DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 35.00 35.00 43.00 43.00 = 1.68 1.68 2.06 2.06 MEH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 25.00 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.24 MSH INTERIOR DOOR 20.00 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.19 MEH New Ext Wall 1749.02 X 0.088 X 28..60 = 4.40 MSH New Gypboard Wall 230.00 X 0.083 X 28.60 0.54 MSH New Attic Ceiling 2600.00 X 0.035 X 49..00 = 4.46 bM SUBTt7TAl, = 30.22 MEH DUCT HEAT LOSS 30.21526 X .10 = 4.81 MSH INFILTRATION 26000.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 7.58 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 8 X 225 = 1.80 M13H KITCEN EQUIPMENT LOAD _ 1.20 MBH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 44.47 MM W = 45.10 MBH N = 45.33 MBH E = 45.61 MEH GRAND TOTAL LOAD S = 64.73 MEH �W = 65.64 M8H N = 65.98 ME E = 66.38 MBH MAXIMUM TONS S = 5.39 TONS W = 5.47 TONS N = 5.50 TONS E = 5.53 1W 040302 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 6 R ASHRAE H)URLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING OJOLING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES PRLI= RANG HD SANTADA PLAN2 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA DIESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 SLMMER OUTSIDE TIIME)FPATURE MINUS INSIDE TIIMIYERATURE 102 - 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 156.00 X 27.00 76.00 41.00 76.00 = 4.21 4.21 6.40 11.86 MM GLASS Rt DOUBT- PANE 110.00 X 76.00 41.00 76.00 27.00 = 8.36 8.36 8.36 2.97 MEH GLASS F MIRTE PANE 96.38 X 41.00 76.00 27.00 76.00 = 3.95 3.95 2.60 7.32 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 125.00 X 76.00 27.00 76.00 41.00 = 9.50 9.50 9.50 5.13 MBH GLASS LR DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 54.00 54.00 67.00 67.00 = 2.59 2.59 3.22 3.22 MBH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TD low DOOR 25.00 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.24 MBH INTERIOR DOOR 20.00 - X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.19 ME New Ext Wall 1749.02 X 0.088 X 28.60 = 4.40 M8H New GypUoasd Wall 230.00 X 0.083 X 28.60 = 0.54 MEH New Attic Ceiling 2600.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 = 4.46 MEH SUBIOTAL = 40.32 M2H DUCT HEAT LOSS 40.32414 X .10 = 6.42 MBH INFILTRATION 26000.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 7.58 MSH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIRTF 8 X 225 = 1.80 MBH KITCHEN EQUIPMENT LOAD = 1.20 MBH TOM SENSIBLE LOAD - S = ,55.45 MBH W = 56.49 MBH N = 56.91 MBH E = 57.33 MBH GRAND TOTAL LOAD S = 80.70 MBH W = 82.22 MSH N = 82.83 MBH E = 83.43 ME MAXIMUM TONS S = 6.73 TC NS W = 6.85 TONS N = 6.90 TONS E = 6.95 TC NS TABLE OF CONTENTS FUR RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 TRACT 31202 _ LA QUINTA . JOB NLTQM 040303 1. - BUILDING SL MUI Y ' 2. - GLAZING SU44iW 3. CF-1R - CaMPLIANCE STATEM NT 4. C-2R - BUILDING DESIGN 5. FORM 3R - CAII.IIIATION OF HEAT TRANSFER CAEFFICIERM 6. R M 4R - HEATIM LOAD CALCULATION 7. Fam 5R - comm LOAD CuaxATION BASED ON LIGHT mAPFS cN ALL wINcowS 8. FORM 6R - OJDLIM LOAD CAILULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANIAM PLAN3, TRACT 31202 JOB N 43ER 040303 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: �. NEW EXT WALL R13 ., NEW GYPBOARD FALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 .DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERT!AETER INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER' 28 PROPOSED BUI DIIT., GLASS GJNFIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE GLASS THROU[MLX7T . EQUIPMENT SIZII, REQUIREMENTS: NEW EWIR-M%yT TO BE SELECIED BY THE CONIRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. IiFATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 46852 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLUMD G: FURNACE AFUE = 80.0016 AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 10.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.61 WATER HEATER BLANKET = R-0 . 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE EQUIP ENT SELECTIONS: TERRY E[.INEERIIS3 IS NOT RESP NSIRT.F. FOR THE DQUIP ENT SELECTION; TMZEFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OARM: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATION;. THE FOLLOWIW.., SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY., . EQUIPMENT QI'Y MAKE MODEL BTU/HP .. FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV036040 '35000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT , 311JAV048075 71000 FACfi EQUIR'mu QTY MAKE MODEL TONS AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) BRYANT 561C036-A 3.0 AIR CONDITIONER 2 (1) BRYANT 561C042-A 3.5 EQUIPmENT ' QTY MAKE MODEL, GALLONS BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS: COMPLIANCE IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE Pauum*KE ANALYSIS MEIFDD. NCIMI PACING RESULT = 28.12 FAST FACING RESULT = 28.25 SOU1H FACING RESULT = 27.00 WEST FACING RESULT = 27.00 WORST CASE RESULT = 28.25 BUDGET = 28.40 NLM ORIENTATION WED H HEIGHT GLASS SUMMARY RANCHO SANTANA PIAN3, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040303 FRAMING WINDOW TYPE U-VALUE , MATERIAL OPENING GLAZING SHADING TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRONT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 2 FRLNT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER HXTAL 3 RIGHT 3.00 6.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 METAL BINGED DUAL 4 RIGHT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 IJ34E SLIDER DUAL 5 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60NONE SLIDER DUAL 6 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDIIR DUAL 7 FRONT 1.00 7.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL _ 8 FRONT 1.00 7.00 .REGULAR '0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL 9 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 10 RIG -IT 6.00 6.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 11 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 12 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIIE R DUAL 13 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 . REGULAR 0.60 NrNE FIXED DUAL 14 REAR 3.00 1.50 RE3IIAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER " DUAL 15 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FLXM DUAL 16 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL. 17 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FILED DUAL 18 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL. 19 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE F= DUAL 20 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 METAL HINW) DUAL 21 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIM DUAL. 22 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NOW FIXED ED DUAL 23 REAR 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR 0.58 METAL SLIDER DUAL, 24 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 25 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FDED DLML 26 RIGHT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 METAL HINGED DUAL 27 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL, 28 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL 29 REAR '3.00 1.50 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DLAL 30 REAR 3.00 5.00 RFX4JLAR 0.60 NONE FILED DUAL, 31 REAR 3.00 1.50 PEU IIAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL, 32 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL 33 REAR 5.00 5.00 P23ULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 34 LEFT 3.00 5.00 REGULM 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 35 L£FT 2.00 4.00 - REGULAR 0.60 NOW SLIDER DUAL 36 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NOIRE SLIDER DUAL 37 LEFT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDIIR DUAL 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R Project Ti_tle.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 'Date�..09/17/04 11:38:09 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... 2863 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Stories.......... 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage......... 19.8 % of floor area Average Glazing U-f actor... 0.43 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC........ 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION "omponent Frame Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly Type Type R-value R-value R-value U-factor Location/Comments -- ----------------- - - -- -- ------ - - - Roof - --- - - - - -- n/a -- - - - - - R-30 --- - - - - --- - - - - --- - - - - R-n/a R-30 0.035 - New Attic Ceil all n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 New Ext Wall all n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083 New Gypboard W Door n/a R-0 R-n/a R-0 0.330 Exterior Door "labEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720 Covered labEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.550 At Garage FENESTRATION ------------ Over- Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ Orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- Window Front (N) ----- 8.0 ------ --------------------- 0.400 0.360 Standard -------------- Standard ----- None Window Front (N) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Door Right (W) 24.0 0.580 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 10.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R ---------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date%.09/17/04 11:38:09 -------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION Over - Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ Orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- Window Right (W) ----- 25.0 ------ 0.400 ------ 0.360 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- None Window Right (W) 36.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window. Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 15.0 0:360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.3.50 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Door Left (E) 24.0 0.580 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400. 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Door Back (S) 48.0 0.580 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Door Right (W) 24.0 0.580 0.350 Standard Standard None Window. Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0 '0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back '(S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 15.0. 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Back (S) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Left" (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2863 ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3. CF-1R Project Title. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3Date%.09/17/04 11 38 09 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLANS HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant Tested ACCA Equipment Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct. Manual Thermostat Type Efficiency. Airflow Location R-value Leakage ------- D ------ Type ---------- ----------- urnace ------------ 0.800 AFUE ------------------ n/a Attic ------- R-4.2 No No SetBack ACSplit 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No SetBack WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value --------------------------------------- -- -------------- ------ ---------- Storage Gas Standard 1, .61 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ------------------=---------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. This printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS ERTIFICATE OF,COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 4 CF-1R ------------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 "Dat'e;,..09/17/04 11:38:09 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 QUINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92680 Phone... ( 0)777-9920 Phone... (71 838-1124 License. Signed.. /J-"/6,> Signed. -q-( 7^20® (date) (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency... Phone... Signed.. (date) :OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..09/17/04 11:38:09 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone...... ... 10 --------------------- .ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. --------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) _----------------------- Design ---------- Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 8.60 ---------- 6.68 ---------- - 1.92 = = Space Cooling.......... 9.85 12.81 -2.96 = = Water Heating.... .... 9.95 8.63 1.32 = = North Total 28.40 28.12 0.28 = = Space Heating........'.. 8.60 7.88 0.72 = = Space Cooling.......... 9.85 11.74 -1.89 = = Water Heating.......... 9.95 8.63 1.32 = = East Total 28.40 28.25 0.15 = = Space Heating......... 8.60 8.17 0.43 = = Space Cooling.......... 9.85 10.20 -0.35 = = Water Heating.......... 9.95 8.63 1.32 = = South Total 28.40. 27.00 1.40 = = Space Heating.......... 8.60 6.90 1.70 = = Space Cooling.......... 9.85 11.47 -1.62 = = Water Heating.......... 9.95 8.63 1.32 = West Total 28.40 27.00 1.40 ** Building complies with Computer Performance *** 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLANS "Date�..09/17/04 11:38:09 -------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area..... 2863 sf Building Type ............... Single Family Detached Construction.Type New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... ReducedYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... one Type -------------- "OUSE Residence Surface OUSE 1 Roof 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Wall 6 Wall 7 Wall 8 Door Slab On Grade 1 28630 cf 2863 sf 19.8 % of floor area 0.43 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING.ZONE INFORMATION ------------------------- Floor # of Vent Vent Air Area Volume Dwell. Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) (sf) Credit ------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- 2863 28630 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE =-------------- SURFACES Area U- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ (sf) ------ factor ----- R-val ----- Azm --- Tilt ---- Gains ----- Reference ------------ Comments ---------------- 2863 0.035 30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic Ceil 392 0.088 13 180 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 473 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 238 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 45 0.088 13 45 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 618 0.088 13 90 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 385 0.083 13 0 90 No None New Gypboard W 24 0.330 0 0 90 Yes None Exterior Door OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ."'Dat-ez..09/17/04 11:38:09 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Surface ------------ HOUSE 9 S1abEdge 10 S1abEdge PERIMETER LOSSES Length ---------------- F2 Insul Solar (ft) ------ Factor -------- R-val ------- Gains ----- Location/Comments ---------------------- 236 0.720 R-0 No Covered 39 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES Area U- Act rientation (sf) ----- factor ----- SHGC ----- Azm --- Tilt ---- --------------------- HOUSE 1 Window Front (N) 8.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 2 Window Front (N) 25.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 3 Door Right (W) 24.0 0.580 0.350 270 90 4 Window Right (W) 10.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 5 Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 6 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 7 Window Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.350 .0 90 8 Window Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.350 0 90 9 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 10 Window Right (W) 36.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 '1 Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 270 90 2 Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 270 90 13 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 14 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 5 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 6 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 17 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 8 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 9 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 20 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.580 0.350 90 90 '11 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 2 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 -3 Door Back (S) 48.0 0.580 0.350 180 90 24 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 5 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 6 Door Right (W) 24.0 0.580 0.350 270 90 27 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 8 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 9 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 o0 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 _�1 Window Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 2 Window Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 3 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 34 Window Left (E) 15.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 5 Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 Exterior Shade Interior Shade Type/SHGC Type/SHGC ---------------------------- Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0-68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R ------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 'Date..09/17/04 11:38:09 ----------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -rientation ---------------------- 6 Window Left (E) 7 Window Left (E) System Type ------------- JUSE Furnace ACSplit Tank Type ------------ 1 Storage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Area U- Act (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 8.0 0.400.0.360 90 90 Exterior Shade Type/SHGC -------------- Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) HOUSE Standard Slab 2863 Interior Shade Type/SHGC -------------- Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant Tested ACCA Minimum Charge and: Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Eff ------------------------------------------------------- --=- 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No R-4.2 No WATER.HEATING SYSTEMS --------------------- Number in Energy Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor ----------- ------------------- ------ -------- Gas Standard 1 .61 No 0.753 No 0.674 Tank External Size Insulation (gal) R-value 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** Zis is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. This printout .is for the front facing North. REMARKS OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page.5 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3� 'Date�'..09/17/04 11:38:09 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403030 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REMARKS 040303 'HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT - PROPOSED CS>NSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA ' DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC F 0 R M 3 R DAM:. 05-17-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 - LIST OF 024STRIJCTICN OUIPONEN TS R OONSIRUCTION ASSEMBLY New Ext Wall 1 R13 Standard Wall (16oc) 11.360 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 ( A.TICN ASSEMBLY New Gypboard Wall WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 . 0 TOM THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.088 BTU/ (HR.FI2.OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.088 BTU/ (HR.FT2.OF) LIST OF CONS`1 TCTICN O:FPOtE IS R . 1 5/8 In. Gypboard 0.500 2 R13 tall (2x4 160c) 9.760 3 1/2 In. Gypboard 0.450 4 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 BTU/ (HR.FI2.OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACIDR 1 0.083 BTU/ (HR.FT2.OF) LIST OF CONSTRUCTION C11'DPCbJENT5 R 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8. 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) _ 28.570 . 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTU/(HR.M OF) 0 OaUZECTED WITH FRAMING FACIOR 1 0.035 BTU/(HR.M OF), 040303 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 4 R PROJECT RANCHO SANPANA PLANS LOCATION TRACT 31.202 a CITY LA aJINIA DESIGNER DESEPT ELITE INC .. . LATE: 05-17-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE FOR ALL 00bIDITIONS OTHER THAN THE FOLLOWIN;: 70 - 32 LINE 1. = 38- FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE T'TNF. 1/2 LINE 2. = 19 FOR UNINSULATED FLOOR OVER VENIED UNHEATED SPACE L NE 2 - 5 F LINE 3. = 14 TTVE HEAT LOSS AREA, FT 2 OR U FRCM FORM TW FR M DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY LENGTH, FT. 3,TABLE 4-1- LOAD GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 220.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 5016.0 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 110.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 2508.0 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 62.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1413.6 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 56.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 1276.8 BIU/FR GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 1057.9 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 1057.9 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 529.0 BTU/HR EXTERIOR DOOR 24.00 X 0.330 X 38.00 = 301.0 BTU/HR New Ext Wall 1766.50 X 0.088 X 38.00 = 5909.1 BIU/HR New Gypboard Wall 385.00 X 0.083 X 38.00 = 1212.1 B'IU/HR New Attic Ceiling 2863.00 X 0.035 X 38.00 = 3808.0 BIU/HR Carpet W/ MADber Pad 0.00 X 18.201 X 1.00 = 4292.8 EiU/HR Perimeter At Garage (R7 Equiv) 0.00 X 13.046 X 1.00 = 502.3 BTU/HR SURIOIAL 4 = 28884.4 BTU/HR INFILTRATION (ENIFR 0 ON LINE 6 IF THERE IS NO IoSITIVE VENTIIAnw) 2863.0 F72 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 38.0 OF L. 5 = 13708.0 BTU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA WEIGHTED AVG. CEILING HEIGHT I FROM TABLE 3-7 DIW FR M LINE SURMIAL 7 = 42592.4 BTU/HR DUCT HEAT LOSS (ENIER 0 ON T,7NF. 8 IF THERE ARE NO DARTS) 0.10 X T. 7 L 8 = 4259.2 BTU/HR T O T.A L (IaNE 7+ 8) T 9= 46851.6 BTU/HR 040303 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 5 R A%GAE HXJRLY BEAT GAIN, # BUILDDU 03OL.ING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON. LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WIImm ..{. PROJECT RANG D SANTANA PLAN3 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA - DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC . DATE: 05-17-04 S[M•'ER OUI5IDE TEMPERATURE MINUS INSIDE TEMPERA"IURE 102 - 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE 'ID LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 268.00 X 20.00 50.00 28.00 50.00 = 5.36 5.36 7.50 13.40 MBH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 158.00 X . 50.00 28.00 50.00 20.00 = 7.90 7.90 7.90 3.16 MBB GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 62.00 X 28.00 50.00 20.00 50.00 = 1.74 1.74 1.24 3.10 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 80.00 X 50.00 20.00 50.00 28.00 = 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.24 MSH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TD LOAD DOOR 25.00 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.24 MBB New Ext Wall 1766.50 X 0.088 X 28.60 = 4.45 MSH New Gypboazd Wall 385.00 X 0.083 X 28.60 = 0.91 MBH New Attic Ceiling 2863.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 = 4.91 MSH SUBIOTAL = 33.03 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS 33.02985 X .10 = 5.26 MBH INFIL=ION 28630.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 8.35 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 4 X 225 = 0.90 MBH KITCHEN EQUIH•EWP LOAD 1.20 MEH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 45.21 MEH W = 48.74 MBH N = 46.86 MEAN E = 48.11 MBH GRAND TOTAL, LOAD S = 65.80 MEH W = 70.93 MBH N"= 68.20 MBH E = 70.02 MBH MX0XIMLM TONS S = 5.48 TONS W = 5.91 'IONS N = •5.68 TONS E = 5.84 TONS 040303 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 6'R AM RAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COO1MQG LOAD CAI0J ATICN BASED CN DO DRAPES ` PROJECT RANCHO SANTANA PIAN3 IOCATION TRACT 31202 . CITY LA QUIIJA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 - SIMMER OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE MINUS INSIDE TEMPERA71IRE 102 - 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSQMIDLY AREA ASHRAE TD LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 268.00 X 27.00 76.00 41.00 76.00 = 7.24 7.24 10.99 20.37 MBH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 158.00 X 76.00 41.00 76.00 27.00 = 12.01 12.01 12.01 4.27 MEH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 62.,00 X 41.00 76.00 27.00 76.00 = 2.54 2.54 1.67 4.71 MBH CLASS L DOUBLE PANE 80.00 X 76.00 27.00 76.00 41.00 = 6.08 6.08 6.08 3.28 MBH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VAIZE ASHRAE TD LOAD DOOR 25.00 X 0.330 X 28.60 ° = 0.24 MBH New Ext Wall 1766.50 X 0.088 X 28.60 = 4.45 MEH New Gypboazd Wall 385.00 X 0.083 X 28.60 = 0.91 MBH New Attic Ceiling 2863.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 4.91 MSH SUBTOTAL = 44.22 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS 44.22385 X .10 7.04 MBH =L'IRAa,ICN 28630.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 8.35 MBH ocaJPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 4 X 225 = 0.90 MBH KITCHEN EQUIRIENT LOAD = 1.20 MER TOM SENSIBLE LOAD S = 55.86 MEH W = 61.71 MBH N = 58.74 MBH E = 60.62 MBH GRAND TOTAL LOAD S = 81.30 MBH W = 89.82 MER N = 85.50 MER E _ 88.23 MBH MAICUIN TCNS S = 6.78 TOMS W = 7.48 TONS N = 7.12 TONS E = 7.35 TONS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANCHO SANZUk CASITh TRACT 31202 I.A. QUINIA JOB NLMBER 040304 1. - BUILDING SU44URY 2. - GLAZING SU4.%RY 3. CF-IR - 0144,LANCE SnWEvENI, 4. C-2R - BUILDING DESIGN 5. FORM 3R - CALCULATION OF BEAT TRANSFER ODEMCIERM 6. FORM 4R - HEATIM LOAD CALCLIATIM 7. FORM 5R - CDOIMG LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT ERAPES ON ALL WINDOWS a 8. FORM 6R - ODOLIM LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON No DRAPES BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANE* A CASITA, TRACT 31202 JOB NU43ER 040304 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL - R13 ' NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 . PERIV= INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 28 PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONFIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE GLASS MEZOL13OLTE EQUIPMENT SIZING REQUIREMFNSS: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE QONIRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET M NIMU,4 BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 10109 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: F RIACE ARM = 80.00% AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 10.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.61 WATER HEATER HLANKEI' = R-0 . 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE Sl-]OW N. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY EMGINEERIM IS NOT RESPONSIRT FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELECTION; THEREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUSS' BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING SELECTIONS ARE FOR RE ZENCE ONLY. EQUIPMENT QIY MAKE NODEL BTU/BR .. FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANi' 3110AV024040 37000 EACH ,. EQUIPMENT QSY MAKE MODES, TCM AIR 00NDITTONER 1 (1) BRYANP 561CO18-B 1.5 =Pmau CTS'Y MAKE N= GALLONS BLANKET . WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-505OT4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS: 03MPLIANK£ IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PERFURMi*M ANALYSIS ME=.- NORTH FACIM RESULT = 88.85 EAST FACING RESULT = 89.90 SOUSI-N FACING RESULT = 87.37 WEST FACINU RESULT = 89.16 WORST CASE RESULT = 89.90 BUDGET = 91.17 - GLASS SUMMARY RANCF%l SANTANA CASITA, TRACT 31202 - JOB NUVMER 040304 FRA16U OPENIINS. GLAZING SHADING N74 ORIENTATION WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE U-VALLLE 'MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRCTTT 2.00 5.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL, 2 FRONT 2.00 5.00 REaff-AR 0.60 NNE SLIDER DUAL, 3 FRONT 2.00 5.00 REr,ULAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER DUAL 4 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FIXED DUAL 5 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 RDGLLAR 0.60 NONE FTXED DUAL, 6 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR 0.60 NONE FDCED DUAL 7 LEFT 2.00 4.00 RFXLIIAR 0.60 NONE SLIDER CUAL 8 REAR _ 2.50 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 NONE HINGED DUAL 9 REAR 2.50 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0.58 NONE HINGED DUAL, ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA rDate:..09/17/04 11:43:58 roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date limate Zone........... 10 --------------------- -ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 ----------------------------------- User -Terry Engineering Run =------------------------------------------- -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... 346 sf Building Type ............... Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Stories.......... 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage......... 26 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.36 Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION "omponent Frame Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly Type Type R-value R-value R-value U-factor Location/Comments ------------ Roof ------- n/a -------- R-30 -------- R-n/a ------- R-30 ------- ------------------------ 0.035 New Attic Ceil all n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 New Ext Wall oor n/a R-0 R-n/a R-0 0.330 Exterior Door SlabEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720 Covered 1_:100100".4AV C90-1 Over - Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ Jrientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- aindow Front (N) ----- 10.0 ------ 0.400 ------ 0.360 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- None 4indow Front (N) 10.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Front (N) 10.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Window Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None window Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None 4indow Right (W) 4.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard None Window Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard None Door Back (S) 20.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Standard None Door Back (S) 20.0 0.370 0.360 Standard Standard None 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2. CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA `bate..09/17/04 11:43:58 ----------------------------------------------------------- - ----- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab. 346 HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant - Tested ACCA Equipment Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Thermostat Type Efficiency Airflow Location R=value Leakage D Type ----------- urnace ------------ 0.800 AFUE ------------------ n/a Attic ------- R-4.2 ------- No ------ No ---------- SetBack ACSplit 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No SetBack WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------------------------------------ -------------- ------ ------- Storage Gas Gas Standard 1 ..61 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS -----=----------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be.documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection:. *** _his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. This printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA "Date..09/17/04 11:43:58 ------------------------------------------------------------ --- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual 'with overall design responsibility. When this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company.. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 QUINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92680 Phone... (7 )777-9920 - Phone... (714) 838-1124 License. Signed.. J d>, Signed.. �` � 7- 200 (date) (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. (date) 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA "-Date..09/17/04 11:43:58 project Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry. ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone..........: 10 ------------------ 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S040304.0 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- = MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = ---------------------------- = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 12.29 10.12 2.17 _ = Space Cooling.......... 26.72 36.11 -9.39 = = Water Heating.......... 52.16 42.62 9.54 = = North Total 91.17 88.85 2.32 = = Space Heating.......... 12.29 10.08 2.21 - - Space Cooling.......... 26.72 37.20 -10.48 = = Water Heating........... 52.16• 42.62 .9.54 - = East Total 91.17 89.90 1.27 = = Space Heating.......... 12.29 10.32 1.97 = _ Space -Cooling ............ 26.72 34.43 -7.71 = = Water Heating........... 52.16 42.62 9.54 = = South Total 91.17 87.37 3.80 = = Space Heating.......... 12.29 9.84 2.45 = = Space Cooling.......... 26.72 36.70 -9.98 _ = Water Heating......`.... 52.16 42.62 9.54 - _ = West Total -------- 91.17 -------- 89.16 -------- - 2.01 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** _ 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA 'Date'..09/17/04 11:43:58 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User-Terry,Engineering Run -RANCHO SANI'ANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area..... 346 sf Building Type.............. Single Family. Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front"Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... ReducedYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones..-. Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage........... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade 1 3460 cf 346 sf 26 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.36 10 ft BUILDING.ZONE INFORMATION ------------------------- Floor # of Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat one Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned . Type "OUSE Residence 346 3460 1.00 Yes SetBack OPAQUE SURFACES Area U- --------------- Insul Act Solar Surface (sf) factor R-val Azm Tilt. Gains JUSE 1 Roof 346 0.035 30 n/a 0 Yes 2 Wall 190 0.088 13 180 90 Yes 3 Wall 155 0.088 13 270 90 Yes 4 Wall 190 0..088 13 0 90 Yes 5 Wall 145 0.088 13 90 90 Yes 5 Door 13 0.330 0 90 90 Yes Vent Vent Air Height .Area Leakage (ft) (sf) Credit 2.0 Standard No Form 3 Location/ Reference Comments None New Attic Ceil None New Ext Wall None New Ext Wall None New Ext Wall None New Ext Wall None Exterior Door 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA 'Date..09/17/04 11:43:58. ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ------ MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surface ------------ HOUSE 7 SlabEdge orientation PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Length F2 Insul Solar (ft) Factor R-val Gains Location/Comments --------------------- --------------------------- __OUSE 1 Window Front (N) 2 Window Front (N) 3 Window Front (N) 4 Window Right (W) 5 Window Right (W) 6 Window Right (W) 7 Window Left (E) 8 Door Back (S) 9 Door Back ( S ) System Type ------------- HOUSE Furnace kCSplit 78 0.720 R-0 No Covered FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Area U- Act Exterior Shade Interior Shade (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type/SHGC Type/SHGC ----- ----- ----- --- -------------------------------- 10.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 10.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 10.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 4.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 4.0 0.360 0.350 2.70 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 4.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 8.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 20.0 0.370 0.360 180 90 Standard/0.76. Standard/0.68 20.0 0.370 0.360 180 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) ---------------- ------ HOUSE Standard Slab 346 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant Tested ACCA Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Eff ----------------------------------------------------- ---- 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic 10.00 SEER No Attic R-4.2 No No 0.753 R-4.2 No No 0.674 'OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA 'Date..09/17/04 11:43:58 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0403040 Wth-CTZ10S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .61 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. his printout is for the front facing North. REMARKS 040304 HEAT TRANSFER. COEFFICIENTS HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED 02ISTA MCN ASSEMBLY PR<7= - RANCHED SANTANA CASITA " LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINIA DESSIQNER DESERT ELITE INC WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 00WIRUCTION ASSESIDLY New.Ext Wall WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 OMSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling F 0 R M 3 R 05-17-04 LIST OF CONSTRUCTION Oa-'MCNENIS R 1 R13 Standard Wall (160c) 11.360 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.088 EIU/(HR.M OF) " U OORRECTFD"WITH FRA EWU FACTOR 1 0.088 BTU/(HR.FT2.OF) LIST OF PITON CTTS R 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL TH8ML RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTU/(HR.FT2.OF) U O3RRECTE'D WITH FRA4IW. FACTOR 1 0.035 BTU/(HR.FT2:OF) 040304 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 4 R ' PRDJECS RANCHO SANTANA CASITA LOCATION TRACT 31202 r' Y CITY IA QUINTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 - HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE - FOR ALL CONDITICNS OTHER THAN THE FOLUMM: 70 - 32 LINE 1. _ 38 FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEA1iD SPACE L.1/2 L. 2. = 19 FOR UNINSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED WWATFD SPACE LINE 2 - 5 F LANE 3..= 14 . CONDUCTIVE HEAT LOSS . AREA, FT 2 OR U FROM FORM TW FRCN DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY Loom, FT. 3,TABLE 4-1 LOAD GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 12.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 273.6 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 30.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 684.0 BTU/HR GLASS L DOU31E PANE 8.00 X 0.600 X 38.00 = 182.4 BTU/HR GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 40.00 X 0.580 X 38.00 = 881.6 BTU/HR EKIERiOR DOOR 13.34X 0.330 X 38.00 = '167.3 BTU/HR New Ext Wall 680.06 X 0.088 X 38.00 = 2274.8 BTU/HR New Attic Ceiling 346.00 X 0.035 X 38.00 = 460.2 BTU/HR Carpet W/ Rubber Pad 0.00 X 18.201 X 1.00 = 1425.9 BTU/HR SUBTriTAL 4 = 6349.8 BTU/HR INFILTRATION (WIER 0 ON ISI%JE 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VENTILATION) 346.0 FT2 X 10.0 FT X .0216 X 38.0 OF T5 = 2840.0 BTU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA WEIG]1ED AVG. CEILIM HEIGHT I FROM TABLE 3-7 DTW FROM LINE SUBIO'TAL. 7 = 9189.8 BTU/HR DUCT HEAT LOSS (FNIER 0 ON LINE 8 IF4I-1EE2E ARE NO DUCTS) . 0.10 X LONE 7 T 8 = 919.0 BTU/HR TOTAL (LINE 7+ 8) T. 9= 10108.8 BTU/HR 040304 COOLING LOAD C A L C U L A T I O N FORM 5 R ASHRAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOLING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS PRQJECT RANCHO SANTANA CASITA LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC DATE: 05-17-04 SUMMER OUTSIDE TEMPERAURE MINUS INSIDE DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA SQ FT GLASS R DOUBLE PANE .. 40.00 GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE ` 12.00 GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 30.00 GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 8.00 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE DOOR 14.34 New Ext Wall 680.06 New Attic Ceiling 346.00 DUCT HEAT LOSS INFILTRATION OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE KITCHEN EQUIRVOU LOAD TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD GRAND TOTAL LOAD DOJaMCM TONS ' 102 - 75 = 27 ASHRAE TD LOAD S W N E S W N E X 20.00 50.00 28.00 50.00 = 0.80 0.80 1.12 2.00 M8H X 50.00 28.00 5.0.00 20.00 = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.24 MBH X 28.00 50.00 20.00 50.00 = 0.84 0.84 0.60 1.50 MER X 50.00 20.00 50.00 28.00 = 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.22 PM U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.14 PM X 0.088 X 28.60 = 1.71 MM X 0.035 X 49.00 = 0.59 MBH SUBTOTAL = 6.44 M8H 6.436884 X .10 = 1.02 PM 3460.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 1.01 MEH 0 X 225 = 0.00 mm = 1.20 MER S = 8.31 'MEH W = 9.67 MBH N = 8.39 MBH E = 9.64 MBH S = 12.10 M8H W = 14.07 MEH N = 12.22 MBH E = 14.03 MSH S = 1.01 TONS W = 1.17 TONS N = 1.02 TONS E = 1.17 TONS J tt f - 040304 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 6 R ASHRAE HXRLY HFAT GAIN, # BUILDING amm LOAD CALCUTAITCN BASED ON NO ERAPES PRO= RANCHO SANTANA CASITA LOCATLCN TRACT 31202 - CITY LA'QUINTA DESIGNER DESERT ELITE INC . RZm 05-17-04 SUVER OUTSIDE TENETRATURE MINUS INSIDE TIIMPERA2URE 102 - 75 = 27 DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 40.00 X 27.00 76.00 41.00 76.00 = 1.08 1.08 1.64 3.04 MBH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 12.00 X 76.00 41.00 '76.00 27.00 = 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.32 MBH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 30.00 X 41.00 76.00 27.00 76.00 = 1.23 1.23 0.81 2.28 MSH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 8.00 X 76.00 27.00 76.00 41.00 = 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.33 M8H DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE 'ID LOAD DOOR 14.34 X 0.330 X 28.60 = 0.14 NO New Ext Wall 680.06 X 0.088 X 28.60 = 1.71 MBH New Attic Ceiling 346.00 X 0.035 X 49.00 = 0.59 MSH ' SUBTOTAL = 8.47 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS 8.468884 X . .10 - 1.35 DM INFILTRATICN 3460.00 X 0.0108 X 27.00 = 1.01 MEN OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 0 X 225 = 0.00 MSH KITCHEN EQuiRAENT LOAD = 1.20 MBH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 9.83 MBH W = 12.03 M8H N = 9.97 NBH E = 11.97 MBH GRAND IVIAL LOAD S = 14.30 MB W = 17.50. MBH N = 14.51 MM E = 17.42 NM NAXINAN TONS S = 1.19 TONS W = 1.46 a N = 1.21 TONS E = 1.45 TCNS 11 } ti SAUNA - 7!� el !�a rise P.O. BOX 1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO APPLICATION ONLY Building LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Address - Ow er ailing ddress7lij,J / �It" y - U-,-,-4 1i-zl -f 3 7 6 6 7 7 - 7 7.1 A Contractor Address ' '0 9' 6 0 �� l 's �t'�-,v� Q��i �(/l d' 3 1 y: f( . 19y'/ 6 7 7 J-;, State Lic. City & Classif. 7,� 3 / i Q Lic. # Arch., Engr., Designer /i✓ i✓p�/rl t�Q /')",9w � y clty zip State ,--'A✓�� " S� � -) Lic. # 5) LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). ❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Profes- sions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or im- provement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). ❑ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company ❑ Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS'COMPENSATIONINSURANCE (Phis section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less). I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to Workers' Corl pensation Laws of California. J Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT. If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation Provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Co Lender's Name�fi �,C t/%�,✓�/��/k d c Lender's AddresVQ/4`•��4Z,4,,pl/,� ✓�+midt; �}�J�fq�/)/%i9 /�31j This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is s spended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this plication and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city a u ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authora r r ' ntatives of this city to enter the above -mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip Validation: YELLOW = APPLICANT WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING: TYPE CONST. OCC. GRP. A.P. Number 76 7 "2o a (/ o a r Legal Description Project Description I Sq. Ft. 1 No. No. Dw. 3 Size �!/ Stories Units New Add ❑ Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ Estimated Valuation PERMIT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. Infrastructure TOTAL REMARKS ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback -,from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by: Date Permit Validated by: PINK = FINANCE r T4hf 4 4a" P.O. BOX 1504 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO (760) 777-7012 LAQUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 77'7-7011 To: Greg Butler, Building & Safety Manager To CDD: 02/18/05 From: Oscar Orci, Planning Manager Due date: 03/02/05 Status:2" d Review Building Plans Approval (This is an approval to issue a building permit) • The Community Development Department has reviewed the Building Plans for the ° following project: I Description: PLAN 4 NEW SET OF PLANS Address or general location 81-715 CHARISMATIC WAY, La Quinta,CA. Applicant Contact: LENNOBEL CO. 949-559-4305 ' The Community Development Department finds that: ❑ ... these Building Plans do not require Community Development Department approval. ... these Building Plans area roved b the Community Development • PP Y Y p Department. ❑ ... these Building Plans require corrections. Please forward a copy of the attached corrections to the applicant. When the corrections are made please return them to the Community Development Department for review. LL 5 Doug Evans, Planning Director date Plan check No. 04-7996 VCA File No. LQ-17179 CITY OF LA'QUINTA PLAN CHECK CORRECTION LIST Desert Elite, Inc./Herington/Noble 78-401 Hwy. 111, Suite G February 21, 2005 La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-9918 PLAN CHECK NO. 04-7996 (Structural)SECOND/FINAL CHECK ADDRESS • APN 767-200-004,5 OCCUPANCY R-3/U-1 SCOPE OF WORK Living Area: '- 2,913 S.F. TYPE-OF-CONST. V-N Garage: 739 S.F. The submitted plans and specifications have been reviewed by the VCA CODE GROUP. In our professional opinion the plans are in substantial conformance with the building codes and regulations adopted by the CITY OF LA QUINTAand the State of California Amendment. APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING PERMIT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED SUBJECT TO OBTAINING APPROVALS/CLEARANCES FROM ALL APPLICABLE CITY DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES, AND ASSOCIATIONS.. . Plans checked by: Perry Ana opoulos VCA CO E GROUP 2200 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 155 Orange, CA 92868 (714) 363-4700 ext. 756 VCA File No. LQ-17179 V i ,! , ABC WINDOW CO. 621 S. Bon View Ave,, Ontario, CA 91701 RATING SHEET UPDATED 12/13/04 CLEAR GLASS - AIR LOW E - AIR STC RATING GLAS.S,IPACI(AGE Class Size TYPE U-Value RES SHGC madduurb, VT no9na.o& U-Value RES SHGC noona�yna. VT noy+d.�pw. at o a1 - CZ � U o Series o i3 r ALUMINUM WINDOWS AND DOORS AA577 HS-1120 108 X 59 XOX Slider .70 .89 / .63 .671.01 .54 .341.32 .68 / .50 26 *3233 41 AA775 HS-R20 7 X 59 XO Slider .70 .69 / .63 .671.61 ,54 .34/.32 .66/,50 26 33 41 AA775 H-R20 47x 72 5 I. Hun 70 .89!.83 87 /,81.54 .341.32 .9150 2833 45 AA700 F-LC25 72 x 80 Fixed .58 ,72!.88 .7418T .41.35/.32 ,81 /.55 2938450 SGD-R20 95X 96 Slidin Door 78.72/.66 .72 /.84 80 .45/,42 .59 /53 32 40 COMBINATION WINDOWS AND DOORS .84 .67 / .81 .88 / .80 .48 .33 / .30 .56 / .49 28 30 32 q4 AV577 1120 107 x 59 XOXAun AV575 HS-R20 71 X 59 XO 84 87 / .81 .88/.60 48.33/.30 .551.49 28 30 32 qq AV775 H RZO 47 x 71 5 I84 .871.81 .661 .60 .48 .331.36 .55 / A 28 29 32 _ 39 AV450 SGD-R20 95 X 95 Slidi.85 .67/,81 .87/.60 49 1 .421.38 1 .55/.50_1 29 43 VINYL WINDOW$ AND DOORS . / .58 .35 .30 / .28 .53 / .47 28 31 32 '.: ; 34 41- VY577 I HSI 108 x 71 XOX 511der .60 .621.57 �72 32 HS-R20 71 x 71 XO Slider .50 .62 / .57 / .68 .35 .30 / ,28 .53 / .47 28 31 32 . 34 41 VY775 H-R25 47 x 71 S i, Hun 50 .821.57 / .58 .35 30 / .28 .53 / .47 28 30 31 40 VY 700 F-FL95 x 59 Fixed 48 .89 / .83 1,65 .30 .32/ .29 .59 / .53 29 32 35 38 VY450 SGD•R20 97 X 86 Sliding Door .47 .62 / .58 .851.5E .33 .381.34 .54 / .48 30 33 10 28 42 DELUXE VINYL WINDOWS AND DOORS DV575 LC 25 70 X 70 XO Slider 47 69 / .52 .82 ! .55 .32 28 / .26 .521.4E 28 30 33 3q OV677 LC-25 118 x 70 XOX Slider .47 .59 / .52 .62 / .65 .32 .28 / .26 .52 ! .48 26 30 33 3q DV575 HC30 70 x 59 XO Slider .47 .59 / ,52 .82 / .55 .32 .26 / .28 .52 / ,48 26 30 33 3q DV577 HC 30 118 x 59 XOX Slider 47 .59 / .52 82 I ,55 .32 .28 / .20 .521.46 26 30 33 3q DV775 HC 30 54 x 90 S I. Hu .47 .59 / .62 .821.55 .32 .28 / ,28 ,52 / .46 29 29 33 3q DV700 HC 30 94 x 70 Fixed 48 81 ! .55 7851.5E .30 ,30 / .27 .54 / .48 30 33 33 DV450 L R-20 1 95 x 95 1 Sliding Door 47 .601.53 7641.6E ,34 .33/.29 ;M .1.47 29 31 33 _ 1 -tA CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. Qw. DATE ?J ��Mldmlq 0Rt FEB 1 8 2005 ESI%FME',Inc. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS - PLAN CHECK REPLY PROJECT: Rancho Santana DATE February 08, 2005 Desert Elite PROJECT .NO. 4428 , CLIENT NO. Plan Check by: Perry Anastopoulos FILE NO. PCO20805 Date Checked: January 21, 2005 Plan Check No.:04-7996 - 1st Check PAGE NO. 1 OF 1 "Rancho Santana" Item No.: Reply Structural Corrections PLAN 4 1. Calculation Package: - Sheet 2, floor loading omitted. - Sheet 5, negative bending stress calculated. - Please review beam #7 for beam between living room and porch. - Sheet 11, drywall omitted. - Sheet 16, live load included, please see revised calculation. - Most critical diaphragm calculated at front of 1-car garage. No blocking required.' - Shearwall has been moved to create a square / rectangular diaphragm. 2. To be addressed by the truss engineer. 3. Sgn has been revised to show all loading and seismic conditions. 4. Detail 7/SD1 has been added to detail the top plate splice. Calculations have been provided on the plan check set. 5. Date, project address, and project number have been provided on the drawings. 6. All red marks have been. reviewed. E S I/ F M E CITY OF LA QUANTA Structura UILDING & SAFETY DEPT. By. Q�� + '°".`��o APPROVED No.S2 5 m . FOR CONSTRU�CT 10 ;W /05 ToP Copies To: (3) Len Nobel P.O. Box 16606 Irvine, CA 92623 (949) .559-4305 Attn: Len, Nobel Ramon R. Wo�r��g l I , S. E. 234EB Q 2005 Prepared By: Amy Perez ffA4# 1800 E. 16th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 835-2800 • Fax (714) 835-2819 1f J`,S `NgPECT10N B F'l7 t NYB L � 0 OREG - --. ------. . TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION, INC. dba GENERAL TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY 105 SE 124' AVENUE > f y VANCOUVER, WA 98684 9 We are an inspection agency recognized by the International Conference of Building Officials. Council of American Building Officials NER — QA275.i This is to verify that: SPATES FABRICATORS, INC 85-435 . MIDDLETON STREET THERMAL, CA 92274 is under our Audited Quality Control Program and has been since: JUNE, 1990 1 We audit the production Quarterly under the Uniform Building Code Section 2304.4.4. ,r TONY LEWIN MANAGER OF WESTERN TRUSS DIVISION -r:,/�;a::,:'i�e:��:, ;.�L."-'' �=a:�e�r�4+:��__��:��.��'��c�r_;9C:_�._�t-'0�°`..Y�y:,`. -.-.�• __111 F-SREPORT TAR ER-5352 Reissued July 1, 2001 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. a 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 . www.icboes.org Filing Category: DESIGN -Wood (038) WAVEMETAL CONNECTOR PLATE FOR WOOD TRUSSES ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC. 1950 MARLEY DRIVE HAINES CITY, FLORIDA 33844 1.0 SUBJECT WAVE - Metal Connector Plate for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: The WAVE plate is a metal connector plate for wood trusses. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel in various lengths and widths and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit loads between truss wood members. Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The WAVE plate is manufactured from No. 20 gage (0.0356 inch (0.90 mm)], ASTM A 653-94 SQ, Grade 40, structural - quality steel with a hot -dipped galvanized coating designated G60. The WAVE plate has slots approximately 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) long by 0.12 inch (3.0 mm) wide that have been punched along the longitudinal axis of the plate. Each punched slot forms two opposite -facing, sharply pointed teeth protruding at right angles from the parent metal. The punched slots are spaced approximately 114 inch (6.4 mm) on center across the width of the plate and approximately 1 inch (25.4 mm) on cen- ter along the length of the plate, with adjacent longitudinal rows staggered 0.06 inch (1.5 mm). Connector plates are available in 1-inch (25.4 mm) increments of width and length. Minimum plate width and length are 1 inch (25.4 mm) and 2 inches (51 mm), respectively. See Figure 5 for details of plate dimensions. There are 8 teeth per square inch (1.24 teeth per square centimeter) of plate surface. The length of each tooth, includ- ing the thickness of the parent metal, is approximately 0.41 inch (10.4 mm), and the width of each tooth is approximately 0.12 inch (3.05 mm). The shank of each tooth is concave and the tip of each tooth is twisted approximately 40 degrees with respect to the plate width. 2.3 Allowable Loads: Tables 1.2 and 3 show allowable lateral loads, tension loads and shear loads for the WAVE metal plate connectors. Also, refer to Figures 1, 2 and 3 for load conditions. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSIfTPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed to transfer the required load without exceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, as determined by species, the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and the direction of load relative to grain. Design for lateral resistance must be in accordance with Section 11.2.1 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 1 shows allowable lateral loads for the metal connector plates. 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the metal connector plate relative to the direction of the load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads (in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connector plates, based on the net section of the metal connector plates for tension joints, which is the allow- able tensile stress of the metal multiplied by the metal con- nector plate tensile effectiveness ratio. 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. The net section of the metal connector plates for heel joints and otherjoints involving shear must be designed using the allowable shear values (shown in Table 3 in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connec- tor plates, which is the allowable shear stress of the metal multiplied by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in Table 3. 2.3.4 Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable -load re- duction factors for the metal plates must be considered cumu- latively, when applicable, in the design of metal connector plates used in fabricated wood trusses. The reduction factors to be considered cumulatively are as follows: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by a strength reduction factor, OR, shown in Table 4, when the plates are installed in lumber with a single -pass, full -embedment roller sys- tem having minimum roller diameters equal to 18 inches (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embedment hydraulic -platen presses, multiple roller presses that use partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic-plat- en presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller. When trusses are fabricated with single -pass roller press- es, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the mini- mum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength -reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members. 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the WAVE metal connector plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 percent at the time of truss fabrication. REPORTS are nut to he constnted as• representing aes'thetirs or unv Other attributes nor eeptrsc sperilieollr addressed. nor arc then to he eunslnaed as an cndurrcmrnt o the subject nl the report ur a rer+unmendarion for its use. rhere a nu n'urr'nn!r ln• ICBU Erulmmun Jeri•rce. ` a lne., ur nnphrd..0 nr ern' tindinS nr Other manner in tho repun. ur as to arn- product c u % Ile hr the report. COPYnght 4; 2001 Page 1 of 5 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for WAVE metal con- matic embedment presses: multiple roller presses that uses nector plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers: com- wood truss must be reduced by the heel -joint reduction binations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic or pneumatic factor. HR, as follows:, presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press: HR = 0.85 - 0.05 (12 tan 6 - 2.0) or, if the adjustment factors given in Table 4 are used, single - roller presses. where: where: When truss fabricators use single -pass roller presses, the 0.65 <- HR <_ 0.85 rollers must have minimum 18-inch• (457 mm) diameters. 6 = angle between lines of action of the top and Plates embedded with a single -pass, full -embedment roller' bottom chords shown in Figure 4. press must be preset before passing through the roller press This heel -joint reduction factor does not apply to conditions by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a with top chord slopes greater than 12:12. hammer. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each WAVE metal 2.6 Identification: , connector plate must be designed for combined shear and Each WAVE metal connector plate is embossed with the iden- tension capacity, based on the orientation of the metal con- tifying mark "WAVE" stamped into the parent metal. nector plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED combined shear and tension must be in accordance with Sec- tion 11.2.4 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Test data in accordance with National Design Standard for 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Metal con- Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI nector plates designed only for axial forces are permitted as 1-1995. splices in the top and bottom chord located within 12 inches ' 4.0 FINDINGS (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment. Design of metal connector plates located at splices in the top and bot- That the WAVE metal connector plate for wood trusses tom chord not located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calcu- complies with the 1997 Uniform Building Code", subject' lated point of zero moment must include combined flexure to the following conditions: and axial stresses. 4.1 For the trusses using metal connector plates de 2.4 Truss Design: scribed In this report, plans and calculations must Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building o- ffi be submitted to the building official. cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in 4.2 The metal connector plates are designed to trans - this report. The truss design must show compliance with the fer the required loads in accordance with the de- code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads sign formulae in ANSIlTPI 1-1995. A copy of the for the metal connector plates may be increased for duration ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the of load in accordance with Section 2335.5 of the code. Cal- building department when this is requested by the culations need to specify the deflection ratio or the maximum building official. deflection for live and total load. For each truss design draw- 4.3 The allowable loads for the metal connector plates ing, the following information, at a minimum, should be speci- must comply with this evaluation report. fied by the design engineer: 4.4 Teeth of metal connector plates placed in knots, ` 1. Truss slope or depth, span and spacing. bark, pitch pockets, holes, and joint gaps are con- 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. sidered ineffective. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of metal connector 4.5 Metal connector plates are installed in pairs on op - plates at each joint. posite faces of truss members connected by the 4. Truss chord and web lumber size, species and grade. plates. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 4.6 Trusses using metal connector plates described in 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loads, concentrated this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator , loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- approved by the building official in accordance quake loads. with Sections 2311.6 and 2343.8 of the code. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TPI 1-1995 and 4.7 Allowable loads shown in the tables In this report any adjustments to lumber -and -metal -connector -plate al- lowable values for conditions of use. may be increased for duration of load In accord- ance with Section 2335.5 of the code. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: 4.8 Application of the allowable loads (shown in the Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- tables in this report) for metal connector plates em- cator who has an approved quality assurance program cover- bedded in lumber treated with fire -resistive chemi- ing the wood truss manufacturing and inspection process in cals is outside the scope of this report. accordance with Sections 2343.7 and 2343.8 of the code and Section 4 of ANS11 TPI 1-1995, National Design Standard for 4.9 Where one -hour fire -resistive rating is required for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction. The allow- trusses using WAVE connectors, see evaluation re - ports ER-1632 and ER-5640. able loads recognized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneu- This report is subject to re-examination in one year. tK-5392 ' .�..._� .._.._. *.,S^` r �.� TABLE 1—ALLOWABLE LA EPAL PV-'SISTANCE VALUES FOR :THE WAVEMFTet .rr,NNFCTna.Pt erct , PLATE MODEL• !f%M�_ r• t'_-�iI_ —: _ -_—.-- ^-� DIRECTION Or GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTM Of PLATE2.3 - _•^__ �- AA EA AE EE ' SPeues ._ner.ihe Gravity I AlbweE4 low Per Plate (pounds per square inch of plate contact srsall METAL P[ATE VALUES RATED BY GROSS AREA METHOD -- -- r Douglas ;.• tt ,r� 206 Hem -fit --!- - --'-: �- 164 --- - 156 .,� I 153 '109 106 I 124 Southern pac-- 0~ I ZOtS 158 16: I i0 WAVE Spruce -pine-!il--`j_----1__.---j- 159 109 i06 118 'dET-.L PLATE VALUES RATED BY SEMI -NET AREA -V1E.T.HOF Douglas fit 1 0.49 � 275 195 1.15 153 Hem -fir 0.43 208 134 :06 124 Southern pine _ 0.33 �75 195 163 170 Spruce -pine -fir 1` 0.42 208 UO 06 118 ISee Figure I for a description of plate orientation. 'The tabulated values are for a single plate. The values are doubled for plates installed on both faces of a joint if area is calculated for a single plate. JMeial connector plates must be installed in pairs on opposite faces of truss members connected by plates. "For metal plates rated by the semi -net area method. the end distance of I; i inch, measured parallel to grain, must be excluded when determine -the metal plate coverage for each member of a joint. See Figure 2 for examples ol')otnts affected by the mandatory reduction of plate coverage. Load _ _ _ _ _ _ Load AA-Orlentatlon AE Orientation Load I I I I I I I I I I I I I'"' �I-I'I'(;I;I 1'I:•I . I I I'I I I I I I I I I., 'I• =f�l�l.l'��I - FIGURE -PLATE ORIENTATIONS Load EA Orientation Load Load EE Orientation ER• 5352 tr•• - 112 ! For S1: I inch ?S.� mm. FIGURE 2—END DISTANCE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEMI -NET AREA METHOD TABLE 2—ALLOWABLE TENSION VALUES AND TENSION EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVE - METAL CONNECTOR PLATE' t I DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE 0' Yp' p` ! 90' Allowable Tension Load -- PLATE MODEL --- _ --_ (pounds per linear Inch per pair of plsbe) Tension Loao EMriency Ratio WAVE ` �qj. 849 _T - 0 i 2 0 -186 For S1: 1 psi 6.89 kPa. —" 'See Figure 3 for a description of plate nricr,:;:urr. 'The length of plate refers to the dunemw., of :!;;r i,)e"rjdina! 3ais of the.area of the plate from which the plate teeth were Steered d :r:n _!:;Ic !abncauon. LrnL;ztl _ Width , Load _ _ _ _ _ _ Load Load Load , TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES AND SHEAR EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATE , DIRECTION OF 1-040 w!7N pESPECT TO LENGTHOF ►LATE DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH RESPECT t; ' ENG', i1 OF PLATE PLATE o )0 T�sr ? 90• 120• 1 ISO* 0•I IO• SO• yo j 7.o I fso MODEL Allowable Shaer Lud (pounm par linear Inch par psfr of plates) Shear Load EMuency Rand ' NAVE - bib 1 16l ! iF.;j.. 567 529 - --- �. 556 0.:63 1 0.,.9 0.33? 0a a r, i-- .,.. , Y,r - n ov kr-a. 3 IIIIIIIIIIII a IFIIIIIIIIII 1 -' IIIIIIIIIIII ;'I a) V Plate Orientation (b) 90e Plate Orientation FIGURE 3—PLATE LENGTH AND WIDTH FOR TENSION ORIENTATION Page 5 of 5 TABLE 4--ALLOWABL.E LATERAL LOAD ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, QR, FOR THE WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM 19-INCH-DIAMETER SINGLE -PASS ROLLER PRESSES E R-5352 PLATE MODEL LUMBER SPECIES SPECIFIC GRAVITY' DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE AA EA AE EE WAVE 0.49 0.815 0.885 0.815 0.885 0.50 0.870 0.905 0.870 0.905 rvm at: i mcrl = LJA mm. 'The Qg value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.49 applies to all wood species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.49 or lower. and the QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.50 applies to, all lumber species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.50 or higher. © 0 - FIGURE 4-HEEL JOINTS TO WHICH THE REDUCTION FACTOR, HR, APPLIES b 0.25 in (6.75 nn) o.c. between slots " \ SIOL width �1F� 0.0756 in (minimum) 1 in (25.4 nn) o.c. II 0.5 in (12.7 nn) between slots uFFset between ' slut length adjacent slots 0.06 in (1.52 mm) PLATE AVAILABLE .IN INCREMENTS OF l IN (25.4 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. ' FIGURE S—WAVE PLATE DIMENSIONS �3/0 in Plate Length - Plate width X EN ERGY. REP,O R T', TERRY ENGINEERING', - ---- -- --------------- tDITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. APPROVED \FOR CONSTRUCTION DAT B 180 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 150, TUSTIN, CA. 92780 PHONE 714-838-1124 -:FAX 714-838-1406 web wwW.terryengineering.com - e-mail info 0 tE;rryengineering.com, ICE, . C TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANC}D SANPANA PLAN 4 TRACT 31202 LA QUINIA JOB NLMBER 040794 • 1. - BUILDING SL?44W ' 2. - CIIAZING SUM44 ZY + 3. CF-1R - C34PLIANKE STATEMENT " r - 4. C-2R - BUILDRU DESIGN ` 5. FORM 3R - CALC(IIATION OF HEAT TRANSFER MEFFICIENLS 6. FORM 4R - HEATIM LOAD CALCLATION 7. FORM 5R - COOlaG LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS 8. FORM 6R - COOLINU LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES 1 s I k t BUILDING SUMMARY RANCID SANn*A PLAN 4, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040794 a 4e PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL. R13 NEW GYPSOARD WALL R13 a NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSTLATTON R4.2 PERIMEI R INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 28 T PROVIDE LAIC TEST" PROVIDE TX VALVE .. PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONFIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE IOW E GLASS THR 01CUT EQUIPMENT SIZING REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIP` UC TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 46403 FIIf UHi. � 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE. AFUE = 80.00'd AIR CODDTTIONER SEER = 12.00 WATER HEATER EF = STANDARD 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EX® THE SIZE SHOWN. , SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: + TERRY ENGINEERING IS NUI' RESPONSOELE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELECTION; MMZEFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE EASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. , THE FOLLOWING Sc'rFr'T•ipNS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. •. EQUURVIENT MY MAKE MODEL BTU/HR FURNACE 1 (2) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH EQUTAV•NT QTY MAKE mini TONS AIR CDNDITI@IER 1 (2) BRYANT 563CO48-A 4.0 EQUIPMENT QI•Y MAKE MODEL - GALLONS BLANKET RESULTS: OWLIANC£ IS BASED CON THE WORST CASE PERFUMWCE ANALYSIS MMM. NORTH FACING RESULT = 46.40 FAST FACING RESULT = 45.49 s SOUIH FACING RESULT = 46.51 - WEST FACING RESULT = 45.36 WORST CASE RESULT = 46.51 B= = 48.13 GLASS SUMMARY t RANGED SWM-A FLAN 4, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040794 r FRAMING OPENING GLAZING SHADING NIPS ORIENIATZON WIDTH HEIGHT WDWW TYPE MATERIAL � TYPE TYPE DEVICE 3 FRONT 1.50 5.00 RFGZIIAR VINYL FILED DUAL 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RIGLEAR VINYL SLIDER CUAL 5 FRONT 2.00 7.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD BIN= DUAL 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL szr= DUAL 8 RIGHT 5.00 ' 5.00 RD3ILAR • VINYL SLIDER DUAL 9 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED LYLAI, 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR, 'REGIIIAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 VINYL FIXED DUAL 12 REAR 8.00, 1.50 R➢GIIIAR r VINYL SLIDER DUAL 13 LEFT 3.00 .8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED DUAL 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 REG IIAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 16 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DLML 17 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER OVAL 18 REAR • 5.00 5.00 REGULAR ' VINYL FIXED DUAL ' 19 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 20 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SIIDING. GLASS DOOR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 21 REAR, 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 22 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR AR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 23 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 24 REAR + 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLLIIER LLML • 25 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REaJIAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 Rl� VINYL SLIDER OVAL 27 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIM DLML 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGIIAR .• VINYL. SLIDER DUAL 30 FRONT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED MAL r re 10 C-RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R - ------------------------------------------------ PL-oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05' 08:43:40 Project Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* L_cumentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date Climate Zone........... 15 --------------------- C mpliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... Building Type .............. Construction Type ......... Building Front Orientation. Number of Dwelling Units... Number of Stories........ Floor Construction Type.... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... 2913 sf Single Family Detached New Cardinal.- N,E,S,W 1 1 Slab On Grade 19.5 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component Frame Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly Type Type R-value R-value R-value U-factor Location/Comments - -- ------------------------ ----------- Roof ------- n/a -------- R-30 ------------------- R-n/a R-30 0.035•New Attic Ceil w-11 n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 New Ext Wall ? 11 ' n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083 New Gypboard W S�abEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720.Covered SlabEdge n/a R-0 R=n/a F2=0.550 At Garage FENESTRATION ------------ Over- Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- indow Right (W) ----- 25.0 ------ --------------------- 0.400 0.360 Standard -------------- Standard ----- Yes ._indow Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes indow Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0:350 Standard Standard Yes Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes -indow Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ,,indow Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes r r7RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R 1*oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------7-------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION Over - Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ -orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- 'indow Right (W) ----- 4.5 ------ ------ 0.400 0.360 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- Yes 'indow Back (S) 40:0 0.360 0.350 Standard. Standard Yes Window Back- (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard- Standard Yes -loor Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes window Back (S) 25..0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes __'indow Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ioor Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes !indow Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes "indow Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ,,'indow Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Front (N) 4.0 0,.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2913 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant Tested ACCA mquipment Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Thermostat Type Efficiency Airflow Location R-value ------- Leakage D ------- ------ Type ---------- ----------- F rnace ------------ 0.800 ------- AFUE ----------- n/a Attic.. R-4.2 Yes No SetBack ACSplitTXV 12.00-SEER Yes Attic R-4.2 Yes No SetBack (, i C-RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF-1R 1-10ject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407940 Wth=CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equipment Type ------------------------ Furnace / ACSplitTXV DUCT TESTING DETAILS -------------------- Duct Measured Supply Leakage Target Duct Surface Area (% fan CFM/CFM25) (ft2) 6% / 122.3 n/a WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ----------------------------------------- -------------- ---------------- ..'ater Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. r. is printout is for the front facing North. This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. is building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) or a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning_ f-stem(s) . HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ** Items in this section require.field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and' *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Target CFM leakage lues measured at 25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING -DETAILS above c may be calculated as.documented on the CF-6R. If the measured CFM is above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce t e duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the c mpliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary f-r Tested Duct Leakage. ibis building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) ('^RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 4 CF-1R y Project Title.......:.. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ,' Date..02/08/05-08:43:40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6. v6.01 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------.-- HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION -------------------------- c a Thermostatic Expansion Valve:(TXV) on the specified air conditioning stem(s). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification not necessary for the RCA.or TXV. REMARKS T-AK SENSIBLE LOAD: 59 MBH f I� r7RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:.RESIDENTIAL Page 5 CF-1R rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 --------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 'File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S92' Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building featuresland.performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 'of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When.this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the 'Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company..DESERT ELITE INC .x Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F .Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 LA QU&NTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 9.2680 Phone... (760) 17 9920 Phone... (714) 838-1124 License.. Signed.. 5 Signed..- ftrAggiC (date) (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed. (date) (-7MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R rroject Title..:....... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 Project Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* 1 )cumentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date rl.imate Zone.......... 15 --------------------- 1 )mpliance Method....... MICROPAS6 v6.O1.for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 --------------=-------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) - Design ---------- Design ---------- Margin = ---------- _ ----------------------- = Space Heating......:... 2.89 2.44 0.45 = = Space Cooling.......... 35.46 34.18 1.28 = = Water Heating.......... 9.78 9.78 0.00 _ = North Total 48.13 46.40 1.73 = = Space Heating.. ...... 2.89 2-74 0.15 = = Space Cooling.......... 35.46 32.97 2.49 = = Water Heating.......... 9.78 9.78 0.00 = East`Total 48.13 45.49 2.64 = = Space Heating.......... 2.89 3.14 -0.25 = - Space Cooling.......... 35.46 33.59 1.87 = = Water Heating....... ... 9.78 9.78 0.00 = = South Total 48.13 46.51 1.62 = = Space Heating.......... 2.89 2.62 0.2"7 = = Space Cooling.......... 35.46 32.96 2.50 = = Water Heating.'.. ...... 9.78 9.78 0.00 = = West Total 48.13 45.36 2.77 = _ *** Building complies ----------------------------------------------------------------- with Computer Performance C^MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R - ------------------------------------------------- 1,_oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA'PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 ----- --------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6 01 File-SO4,07940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 I, - ------------------------------------=--------------------------------------- ne Type HOUSE esidence c_rface F USE Roof 2 Wall Wall Wall wall 6 Wall GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area..... 2913 sf Building Type........ Single Family Detached Construction Type .......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type....:..... ReducedYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building -Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC..-..... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade 1 29130 cf 2913 sf 19.5 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION ------------------------- Floor # of , Area Volume Dwell. Cond- Thermostat (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type 2913 29130 1.00 Yes SetBack Vent Vent Air Height Area Leakage (ft) (sf) Credit 2_ 0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES Area U- --------------- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ (sf) ------ factor-R-val ----- ----- Azm --- Tilt ---- Gains ----- Reference ------------ Comments ---------------- 2913 0.035,30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic.Ceil 347 0.088 13 180-_ 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 585 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 152 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 663 0.088 13 90 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 495 0.083 13 0 - 90 No None New Gypboard W t 1--)MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Length ---------------- F2 Insul *Solar Surface (ft) ------------ ------ Factor -------- R-val ------- Gains Location/Comments ----- ---------------------- HOUSE 7 S1abEdge 232 0.720 R-0 No Covered 8 SlabEdge 50 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Area U- Act Exterior Shade Interior Shade orientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type/SHGC Type/SHGC -------------------- ----- ----- ----- --- -------------------------------- 1 _,US E 1 Window Right-(W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Front (N) 7.'5 0.360 0.350 0 90 4 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 - Window Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.350 0 90 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 0 90 Window Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 R Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 270 '90 11 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door. Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 90 90 14 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 Window Back (S). 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 18 Window' Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 270 90 21 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 .- Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 24 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 ?I-- Window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 L. Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 .90 90 28 Window Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 '90 90 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 _ Window Front (N) 4.0 0.360 0.350 0 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 r"gMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R r.oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 -------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _rface ] )USE Window 2 Window Window Window Window F Door Window Window 9 Window Window Window 12 Window Door Window 1J Window 16 Window Window Window 19 Window Door Window 2:2 Window ?� Window Window Window 26 Window' Window Window 29 Window Window OVERHANGS AND SIDE FINS ----------------------- --- Window- ------Overhang----- ---LeftFiri--- ---Right Fin -- Area Left Rght_ (sf) Wdth Hgth Dpth Hght Ext Ext Ext Dpth Hght Ext- Dpth Hght ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- - -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a .5 14.0 2 7 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 8.0 2 4 1 2' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 40.0 8' 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.0 8 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 24.0 3 8 20.1 2, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.' n/a n/a 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 .2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7.5 5 1.5. 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 48.0 6 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30.0 6 5 1' 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a on/a n/a 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a, n/a n/a n/a 'n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 1 2- n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.0 4. 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a. 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.0 2 2 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) HOUSE Standard Slab 2913 ,-IMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 5 C-2R ---------------- ------------------------------------------------- eroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Type ------------- )USE 'urnace ACSplitTXV HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant.. Tested ACCA Minimum Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Efficiency Airflow Location ------------------------------- R-value ------- Leakage --------- D 7-------- 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic R-4.2 Yes No 12.00 SEER Yes Attic R-4.2 Yes No Equipment Type ------------------------ HOUSE Furnace / ACSplitTXV DUCT TESTING DETAILS -------------------- Duct Leakage Target (% fan CFM/CFM25) ------------------ 6% / 122.3 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Measured Supply Duct Surface Area (ft2) n/a Duct Eff 0.815 0.703 Number..., Tank External in Energy. Size Insulation 'ank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value Water Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** :is is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. is printout is for the front facing North. . is building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. 1-nis building incorporates either Tested. Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) 0- a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning stem(s) . HERS.REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** ")MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 6 C-2R --------------------------------------------------------- rroject Title........;. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..02/08/05 08:43:40 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File'SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206,'User-Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------ '-------------------------------------------------------- HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION --------------------------- its building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Target CFM leakage -„slues measured at-25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING DETAILS above or.may be calculated as documented on the CF-6R. I.f the measured CFM s above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce ie duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. )r Tested Duct Leakage.- . . This building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning _lrstem(s). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is,not necessary•for,the RCA or TXV: REMARKS y 040794 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS FORM 3 R HEAT TRANSFER COEF•ETCIENI' . PROPOSED 03NSIRIXTION ASSEMBLY PRO= RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY IA QUINTA OWNER DESERT ELITE IIATE: 11-16-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF CDNS`I IJCI ON CCMINRE 8 R CSTON ASSEMBLY New Ext Wall 1 R13 Standard Wall (160c) 11.360 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 .0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 20271E THEM%L RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 - 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.088 BIU/ (HR. M. OF) U C0RRECIID WITH FRAMING FACIOR 1 0.088 HTU/(HR.FI2.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 LIST OF OONSIRUCTION acmPTIawm R CONSIIIITCTICN ASSEMBLY New Gypboard Wall 1 5/8 In. Gypboard 0.500 2 R13 Wall (2x4 16oc) 9.760 3 1/2 In. Gypboard 0.450 4 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL. nO MAL RESISBUKE (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 HIU/(HR.FT2.OF) U CORRECIED WITH FRA4ING FACTOR 1 0.083 HTU/(HR.FI2.OF) WEIG?r OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF QkgSIRUCTION QT ONENM R a2sm cm ASSFIymLY New Attic Ceiling 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 "TOTAL TERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT 'TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.035 HTU/(HR.ET2.OF) :U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.035 RIU/(HR.FI2.OF) 040794 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION'. FORM 4 R . ' PRCI7ECT RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINIA OWNER DESERT ELITE I1AT£: 11-16-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE ` FOR ALL CONDITIONS OWEgE2 THAN THEFOLLOWIIIG: 70 - 31 - LINE 1. = 39 FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE LINE 1/2 LINE 2. = 19.5 FOR UNINSU ATED FICOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE L IIS 2 - 5 F LINE 3. = 14.5 OaNDRTIVE HEAT LASS AREA, FT 2 OR U FROM FORM TW FROM DESCRIPTION OF ARSRMM Y Lacm, FT. 3,TABLE 4-1 LOAD GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 6.600 X 39.00 = 5323.5 HIU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE - 108.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 2538.9 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 25.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 596.7 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 111.00 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 2597.4 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 39.00 = 1085.8 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 = 346.3 BTU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 = 346.3 BTU/HR New Ext Wall 1747,90 X 0.088 X 39.00 = 6000.7 BTU/HR New Gypboard Wall 494.90 X 0.083 X 39.00 = 1599.1 BTU/HR New Attic Ceiling 2913.00 X 0.035 X 39.00 = 3976.4 BTU/HR Catpet W/ Mbber Pad 0.00 X 12.930 X 1.00 = 2999.E BIU/HR Perimeter At ra.age (R7 Egmv) 0.00 X 9.268 X 1.00 = 458.8 BTU/HR • SLIMOTAL 4 = 27869.8 BTU/HR INFILTRATTON (ENTER 0 ON LINE 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VENTILATION) , 2913.0 , FT2 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 39.0 OF LINE 5 = 14314.5 BTU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA WEIGHTED AVG. CEILING HEIGHT I FROM TABLE 3-7 DLW FROM LINE SUBICT AL 7 = 42184.2 BTU/HR DUCT HEAT LASS (ENTER 0 ON LINE 8 IF THERE ARE NO DUCTS) 0.10 X LINE 7 LIM 8 = 4218.4 BIU/HR TOTAL (LINE 7+ 8) L IIS 9 46402.7 BTU/HR 040794 •COOLING LOAD CALCULAT I0N FORM 5 R AS-MM HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOLING LOAD CAIja1ATICN BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES CN ALL WINDOWS PROJECT RANCHD SANfANA PLAN 4 LOCATION TRACT 31202. CITY LA QUnM OWNER DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 - SUKTM OUTSIDE TEMPERABIRE MINUS INSIDE TEKPERATURE 112 - 75 = 37 .. .• . DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD SQ FT S W N E - S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 23.80 53.80 ,31.80 53.80 = '5.41 5.41 7.23 12.24 MBH CLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 156.50 X 54.60 32.60 54.60 24.60 = 8.54 8.54 8.54 3.85 MBEs GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 49.50 X 33.40 55.40 25.40 55.40 = 1.65 1.65 1.26 2.74 MSH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 135:00 X 56.20 26.20 56.20 34.20 = 7.59 7.59 7.59 4.62 MBH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 0.01 MBH New Ext Wall 1747.90 X 0.088 X 33.60 = 5.17 MSH New G�pboaxd Wall 494.90 X 0.083 X 33.60 _ 1.38 MEH New Attic Ceiling 2913.00 X 0.035 X 54.00 = 5.51 MSH SLEYIOTAL = 36.69 MSH DUCT HEAT LOSS 36.68816 X .10 i 6.43 'MBH , INFILTRATION 29130.00 X 0.0108 X 37.00 = 11.64 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD' - SEVSIIM-E 10 X 225 = 2.25 MBH KITOEN EQMRVMgr LOAD 1.20 MBH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S 56.78 IM W = 57.20 MEH N = 5B.21 MBH E = 57.03 MEH GRAND TOTAL, LOAD ' S =� 86.03 MBH W = 86.67 MBH N = 88.19 MSH E = 86.41 HE MAXIM11W TONS S = 7.17 TONS 'W = 7.22 TONS N = 7.35 'TONS E _ 7.20 TONS ' r 4 040794 COOLING LOAD ,CALCULATION FORM 6R • f 4 • ASHRAE HOLEW HEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOLING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES PROJECT RANCHO SANI'ANA PLAN 4 " F LOCATION TRACT 31202 , CITY LA WINIA Y Opom DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 SUS OUTSIDE TENMUUUZE MINUS INSIDE• TEMPERATURE 112 --75 37 • DESCRIPTION OF ASSEN KY AREA ASHRAE TD 'LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 30.80 79.80 44.80 79.80 = 7.01 7.01 10.19 18.15 MBH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE • 156.50. X 80.60 45.60 80.60 31.60 = 12.61 12.61 12.61 4.95 MBH , GLASS F DOLIDLE PANE 49.50 X 46.40 81.40 32.40 81.40 = 2.30 2.30 1.60 4.03 MBH GLASS L DOU31E PANE 135.00 X 82.20 33.20 82.20 47.20 = 11.10 11.10 11.10 6.37 MEH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASMAE TD LOAD DOOR ` c 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 = 0.01 MBH New Ext Wall 1747.90 X 0.088 X 33.60 = 5.17 MER New GADboazd Wall 494.90 X 0.083 X 33.60 = 1.38 MEH New Attic Ceiling '2913.00 X 0.035 X 54.00 = 5.51 ME • ' �• SI�TVIAL = 47.57 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS d 47.57117 X .10 = 8.33 ME • INFILIRATIOi 29130.00 X ' 0.0108 X 37.00 = 11.64 MEH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 10 X 225 a = 2.25 MER HIMNEN EQUIFMFNT LOAD : _ 1.20 MER TOTAL'SENSIEIE LOAD i S = 68.50 MBH W = 69.29 MBH N = 71_00 MBH E = 68.99 MBH GRAND TClAL LOAD _ S;= 103.79 MeH W = 104.99 MSH N = 107.57 MBH E = 104.53 MBH MAXIMUM TONS S = 8.65 'BENS W = 8.75 TONS N = 8.96 TONS E = 8.71 TONS y . BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANPANA PLAN 4X,.TRACT ,31202, JOB NUHMER 040795 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL ` R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DLICf INSULATION 14 R4.2 i PERIMETER INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE -NLNBER 28 PROVIDE LEAK TEST • PROVIDE TX VALVE PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS FIGURATION: r PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE LOW E GLASS THROUGKW EQUTA`+M SIZIL. REQUIRRM4 S:- NEW EQUIPMENT TUBE -sELEc ED BY THE OON7iRA= TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQuip MENTS: 1. HEATIM CAPACITY.TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING., HFATRU LOAD OF 50054 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE ARE = 80.00% AIR CONDITIONER R SEER = 12 00 WATER BEATER EF = SIAWDARD 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO DROP EXCEED THE SIZE SEWN. SAMPLE EQUIPMEW SELECTI NS: TERRY FNGINEERIM IS NOT RESPONSTEll . FOR THE EQUIFMEPR' SELECTICN; THEREFORE, a THE FINAL SFIECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN C IMUA PROVIDED BY THE CDdM: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALQJLATIONS• THE FOLLOWING SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. f BQUTAvom QTY MAKE MODEL SIU/HR IVRNACE 1 (1) • BR7ANT 311JAV048090 71600 EACH FLIIIIl1(£ -1 (1) . ' BRYANT 3110AV036110 89000 EACH' EQ[LIL?�NT • '' QTY. mm MODEL, TONS AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) a BRYANT 563CO48-A 4.0 AIR OJNIDITIONER 1 4 (1) BRYANT 563CO60-A 5.0 EQUIRM= QTY MAKE mom C;nT�� r BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS: - I OONPL.LANKE IS BASED ON THE WORST CASE PERFOR14*4CE ANALYSIS MEIFDD. NORTH FAmr. RESULT = 45.69 - FAST FACCD33 RESULT = 44.64 I SOUIH FACING RESULT .= 45.79 WEST FACING RESULT = 44.64 t WORST CASE RESULT = ` 45.'79 BUDGET = 46.29 ` e ' t I C t I GLASS SUMMARY RANCHO SANIA A FLAN 4X, TRACT 31202 ' JOB NUMBER 040795 , FRAMING OPPNIW. GLAZING SHADING NUM ORIENPATION WIDI i HEIGHT WIDOW TYPE f mmliIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 2 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, 3 FRONT 1.50 5.00 RDGL[LAR ., VINYL t . FIXFO IAAL 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL -'SLIDER DUAL 5 FRONT 2.00 7.00• REGULAR VINYL +FIXED •HIDTEI) D[AL ' 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD DUAL 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REGUM VINYL SLIDER DUAL 8 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 9 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 12 REAR 8.00 1.50 RE3ULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 13 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINTED DUAL 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 RE3U[,AR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 16 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 17 REAR 51.00 1.50 RE ULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 18- REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 19 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 20 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR VINYL SLIDER DUAL ' 21 REAR' 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 22 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR "732M SLIDER DUAL 23 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 24 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIM LAAL 25 LEFI' 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL,. SLIDER LAAL " 27 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL+ SLIDER DUAL, 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGLAR ,VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 30 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DL AL 31 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 32 RIGH[' 6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINM) DUAL • t C"RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R - ---------------------------------------------------- F.Loject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN AX Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 Project Address......... TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* I cumentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry'Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838,-1124 Field Check/ Date Climate Zone........... 1`5 --------------------- C mpliance Method......- MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------.------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area..... 3180 sf Building Type. ........... Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units ... 1 Number of Stories. ........ 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage..:...... 20.2 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.3.8 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..:... 10 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component Frame Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly Type Type R-value R-value R-value U-factor Location/Comments Roof n/a R-30 R-n/a R-30 0.035 New Attic Ceil W=11 n/a R-'13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 New Ext Wall 11 n/a R'-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083 New Gypboard W c-abEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.720 Covered SlabEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.550 At Garage FENESTRATION Over - Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins -------------------- in dow Right (W) ----- 25.0 ------ 0.400 ------ 0.360 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- Yes indow Right (W) 6.0' 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350�Standard Standard Yes indow Right (W) 25.0 0.400. 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes T.Tindow Right (W) 8.10 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Lndow. Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ..indow Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes r7RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R r�•oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION Area U- .)rientation (sf) - Factor SHGC ------- indow ------- - Right - - - - (W) - - - - - 4.5 - - - - -- 0.400 - - - - -- 0.360 indow ' Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 -ioor Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 findow Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 findow Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 .findow Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Window Back (S) 7:5 0.400 0.360 ioor Right (W). 48.0 0.370 0.350 findow Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 -indow Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 indow Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 'indow Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 _'indow Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 'findow Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 'indow Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 quipment Minimum Type Efficiency F rnace 0.800 AFUE I SplitTXV 12.00 SEER Over - Interior Exterior hang/ Shading Shading Fins Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard- Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard. Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes Standard Standard Yes SLAB SURFACES Slab Type ---------------- Standard Slab HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant Charge and Duct Airflow Location n/a Attic. Yes Attic Area- (sf) 3180 Tested Duct Duct R-value Leakage R-4.2 Yes R-4.2 Yes ACCA Manual Thermostat D . Type No SetBack No SetBack r-RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF-1R ------------------ ------------ rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 ------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206" User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DUCT TESTING DETAILS Duct Measured Supply Leakage Target Duct Surface Area Equipment Type (% fan CFM/CFM25) (ft2) ------------------------------------------ ----------------- Furnace / ACSplitTXV 6% / 133.6 n/a WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ----------------------------------------- -------------- ------ ---------- later Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** This is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. is printout is for the front facing North. This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. is building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) or a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning r••stem(s) HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Target CFM leakage lues measured at 25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING DETAILS above c_„may be calculated as documented on the CF-6R. If the measured CFM is above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce t a duct leakage and.then must be retested. Alternatively, the c npliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. If .ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary f-r Tested Duct Leakage. I.L.Lis building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) --;RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page-4, CF-1R ---------------- --------------------------.------------------------ rroject Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program-FORM_CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run --RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION M a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). on the specified air conditioning Tstem(s). If.a.cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification 1j not necessary -for the RCA or TXV - - REMARKS :AK SENSIBLE LOAD: 64 MBH i-RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 5 CF-1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08,/05 08:44:02 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and.performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When this certificate'of compliance 'is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated in the. Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F LA QUINTA CA 92253 Phone... (760)PJ920 License. \ \I1 Signed.. ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... to Signed. (date Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry'Engineering Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 Tustin, CA. 92680 . Phone... (714) 838-1124 Signed.. (date) )MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date-..02/08/05 08:44:02 project Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* --)cumentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714).838.-1124 Field Check/•Date (".imate Zone........... 15 --------------------- 1 )mpliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ---------------------------- MICROPAS6.v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2.39 0.38 = = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 34.34 0.22 = = Water Heating.......... 8.96 8.96 0'.00 = = North Total 46.29 45.69 0.60 = = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2-64 0.13 _ = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 33.04 1.52 = = Water Heating.......... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = = East.Total 46.29 44.64 1.65 = = Space Heating. ........ 2.77 2.77 0.00 _ = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 34.06 = Water Heating.......... 8.96 8.96 0.00. _ = South Total 46.29 45.79 0.50 = = Space Heating.......:.. 2.77 2.32 0.45 = = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 33.36 1.20 = = Water Heating.......... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = West Total -------- 46.29 -------- 44.64 -------- 1.65 Building complies ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- with Computer Performance C-MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R --------------------------------------------------------- Project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Ar.ea..... 3180 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type New Building Front Orientation.. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type......... ReducedYear Floor Construction Type.... Number.of Building Zones..: Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing•SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade', 1 31800 cf 3180 sf 2.0 .2 % of . f loor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent, Vent Air Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage ne Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) - (sf) -- ------ Credit --------- ------------ ------------ HOUSE ----------------------- ----- esidence 3180 31800 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES Area U- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ I-rface (sf) factor R-val Azm Tilt Gains Reference Comments I USE Roof -3180 0.035.30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic Ceil 2 Wall 347 0.088 13 180 90 Yes None New Ext Wall - Wall 670 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 340 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall 5 Wall 743 0.088 13 90 - 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 162 0_083 13 0 90.No None New Gypboard W C-MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 3 C-2R rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X -----=------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES ----------------- Length F2 Insul Solar Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Location/Comments ------------ --------------------- ----- -------------------.--- HOUSE 7 S1abEdge 272 0.720 R-0 No Covered 8 S1abEdge 16 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Area U- Act Exterior Shade Interior Shade 0-ientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type/SHGC Type/SHGC -------------------- ----------`----- --- -------------------------------- I._,USE 1 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350 0 90 4 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 - Window Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.350 0 90 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 0 90 i Window Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 R Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 270 90 11 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 90 -90 14 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 18 Window' Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 270 90 21 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180, 90 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 24 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 2r- Window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 2. Window Left (E) 25.'0 0.400 0.360 90 90 28 Window -Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 :90 90 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 _ Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 31 Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 _" Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 270 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 F-MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R 'rroject Title....... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S04079SO Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERHANGS AND SIDE FINS --- Window --- ------Overhang----- ---Left Fin--- ---Right Fin -- Area Left Rght surface (sf) Wdth Hgth Dpth Hght Ext Ext Ext Dpth Hght Ext Dpth Hght l USE - . Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 7.5 1.5 5 1; 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5 Window 14.0 2 7 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a' n/a n/a n/a Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 8.0 2 4 1 2' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a . Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 40.0 8 5' 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a .n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a -- Door 24.0 3 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a i5 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a,, n/a 'n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Door 48.0 6 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 30..0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 22 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 30.'0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 9..0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a GJ Window. 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 26 Window`. 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 6.0:4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 29 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a :- Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a _ Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3z Door 48.0 6 8 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) HOUSE Standard Slab 3180 1--)MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 5 C-2R eroject Title.......... RANCHO.SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05 08:44:02 MICROPAS6 v6:01 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Type ------------- j )USE 'urnace ACSplitTXV HVAC SYSTEMS Refrigerant Tested ACCA Minimum. Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Eff ------------------------------------------------------- ---- 0.800 AFUE n/a Attic 12.00 SEER Yes Attic R-4.2 Yes R-4.2 Yes DUCT TESTING DETAILS -------------------- Duct Measured. Supply Leakage Target Duct Surface Area Equipment Type ( % .f an CFM/CFM2 5 ) ( f t2 ) ------------------------------------------ ----------------- HOUSE Furnace / ACSplitTXV 6% / 133.6 n/a WATER HEATING SYSTEMS --------------------- Number. Tank in Energy Size .ank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) Water Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards No 0.815 No 0.703 External Insulation R-value SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** is is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. is printout is for the front facing North. is building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Tnis building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) or a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified.air conditioning stems) . HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** j 1--)MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 6 C-2R :------------------------------------------------------- - eroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..02/08/05..08:44.02 MICROPAS6 v6 01 File-S0407950 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION- ! -------------------------- Lis building -incorporates Tested Duct Leakage.'Target'CFM 1'eakage -values measured at 25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING DETAILS,'above or may be calculated as documented on the CF-6R. If`the'measured'CFM above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce Le duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively;.the' compliance calculations could be redone without duct•testing.' ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary . )r.Tested Duct Leakage. -Iiis building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant'Charge'and�Airflow (RCA) a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air"conditioning :,Y-stem(s). If a cooling system is not installed; then•HERS verification is not necessary for the RCA or TXV. REMARKS •, r t a 040795 HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS FORM 3 R HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT PROPOSED (ONSTRUCTIC N ASSEMBLY PRO= RANaD SANI7M PLAN 4X LOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINTA CIWNER DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY ' 0.000 LIST OF 0201RXTION 0I4UIIS R QSISLRI =CN ASSEMBLY New Ext Wall 1 R13 Standard Wall (16oc) 11.360 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6. 0.000 7 • 0.000 8 0.000 9'.: 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOIAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.088 BTU/(HR.FT2.OF) U CARRECi€D WITH FRAMEW. FACIOR 1 0.088 BTU/(HR.FT2.OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 LIST OF CX I w Q2vuENII5 R CMZTI =ICN ASSEMBLY New Gypboard Wall 1 5/8 In. Gypboard 0.500 2 R13 Wall (2x4 16oc) 9.760, 3 1/2 In. Gypboard 0.456 4 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL =ZMAL RESISTAUM (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 BTU/ (HR.FT2. OF) U CDRRECTED WITH FRAMING FACIOR 1 0.083 BTU/(HR.FT2.OF) WEIG-PT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF CONSiRUCTLON 02APONEbTL9 R QziS1RUC w ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling .. 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOM THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 • 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTO/(HR.FI2.OF) =U CORRECLFD WITH FRAMING FACIOR 1 0.035 RIU/ (HR. F12. OF) 040795 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 4R PROJECT RANCH SWBU,]A PLAN 4X IOCATION TRACT 31202 CITY IA 9JI1,TTA OWNER' DESERT ELITE DATE:, 11-16-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS DESIGN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE FOR ALL CONDITIONS OIHER THAN THE FOLLOWING: 70 - 31 LINE 1. = 39 FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNH&ATED SPACE LINE 1/2 LINE 2. 19.5 FOR [ININSULAT D FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEATID SPACE LINE 2 = 5 F LINE 3. = 14.5 CONDUCTIVE HEAT LOSS AREA, FT,2 OR U FROM FORM TW FROM DESCRIPTION OF ASSFNIDLY LFNom, FT. 3,MkME 4-1 LOAD GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 5323.5 FtN/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE BANE 108.50 X 0.600 8 39.00 = 2538.9 HIU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 51.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 1205.1 FACT/HR GLASS L DOUELE PANS 111.00 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 2597.4 BnU/HR GLASS Rt DOURE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 39.00 = 1085.8 BTU/HR (LASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 = 692.6 EfIU/HR (LASS F DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 346.3 FILU/HP GLASS L DOURE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 - 346.3 BTU/HR New Ext Wall 2100.50 X 0.088 X 39.00 = 7211.2 BIU/HR New Lypbaa'd Wall 161.60 X 0.083 X 39.00 = 522.2 FTTU/HR New Attic Ceiling 3180.00 X 0.035 X 39.00 = 4340.9 SIU/HR Carpet W/ Rubber Pad 0.00 X 12.930 X 1.00 = 3517.1 FlIU/HR Perimeter At Garage (R7 Fquiv) 0.00 X .9.268 X 1.010 149.8 EfIU/HR SUBTOTAL 4 = 29877.1 BTU/HR INFILTRATION (FNIER 0 ON T. 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VFNTILATIOJ) 3180.0 FT1 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 39.0 OF LINE 5 = 15626.5 SIU/HR G3ROSS FLOOR AREA WEIGHTED AVG. CEILING HEIGHT I FRC14 TABLE 3-7 DIW FROM LINE SUBTLJLPL 7 45503.6 BTJ/HR DUCT HEAT LOSS (ENTER 0 ON LINE 8 IF THERE ARE NO DULLS) 0.10 X LINE 7 LINE 8 = 4550.4 SIU/HR T O T A L (LINE 7+ 8) LINE 9= 50054.0 BIU/HR 040795 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 5R ASHRAE HOURLY HERS GAIN, # BUILDING COOLING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WINDOWS PROJECT RAND SANTANA PLAN 4X ". LOCATICN TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINIA CWNER DESERT ELITE DATE:11-16-04 . SCMYM OUISIDE TEMPERATURE MINUS INSIDE 'TEMPERAT[II2E 112 - 75 _ 37 DESCRIPTION OF A+.SSEI-MY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 23.80 53.80 31.80 53.80 - 5.41 5.41 7.23 12.24 MER GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 204.50 X 54.60 32.60 54.60 24.60 = 11.17 11.17 11.17 5.03 MBH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 75.50 X 33.40 55.40 25.40 55.40 - 2.52 2.52 1.92 4.18 MEH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 135.00 X 56.20 26.20 56.20 34.20 = 1.59 7.59 7.59 4.62 MEH DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 = 0.01 MER New Ext Wall 2100.50 X 0.088 X 33.60 6.21 MEH New Gypboard Wall 161.60 $ 0.083 X 33.60 = 0.45 MEH New Attic Ceiling 3180.00, X 0.035 X 54.00 = 6.01 MER SUBTOTAL = 40.59 MEH DUCT HEAT LOSS 40.58909 +X' .10 = 7.11 MEH INFILTRATION 31800.00 X 0.0108 X 37.00 = 12.71 MEH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 10 X 225 = 2.25 MEH KITCHEN EQUIR,ENT LOAD = 1.20 MEH T= SENSD3L£ LOAD S = 62.64 MEH W = 62.58 MSH N = 63.86 MBH E _ 62.02 MEH GRAND TOTAL, LOAD S = 94.91 MER W = 94.82 MEH N = 96.75 MEH E 93.97 MEH MAXDMUM TONS S = 7.91 ItW W = 7.90 TONS ' N = 8.06 TCNS E = 7.83 TONS 040795 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION F0R'M,6,R ' ASHRAE FID[II2LY HEAT GAIN; # y.. BUILDING OJOLING TOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES R PROJECT` RANCH:) SAWDM PLAN 4X LOCATION TRACT 31202 s CITY IA QUINIA r - ' Omm. DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 • SL7MER OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE M[DW. INSIDE TIIMFERA4[7RE 112 - 75 37 1)E=PTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD SQ FT S W N E i S W N E +• GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 30.80 79.80 44.80 79,.W = 7.01 47.•01 10.19 18.15 MEE GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 204.50 X 80.60 45.60 80.60 31.60 = 16.48 16.48 16.46 6.46 MSH GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 75.50 X 46.40 "81.40 32.40 81.40 = 3.50 3.50 2.45 6.15 MBH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 135.00 X 82.20 33.20 82.20 47.20 = 11.10 11.10 11.10 6.37 MBH r DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 i } = 0.01 MSH New Ext Wall 2100.50 X 0.088 X 33.60 ; = 6.21 MEH New Gypboazd Wall ' 161.60 X 0.083 X 33.60 _ 0.45 MEH New Attic Ceiling 3180.00 X 0.035 X 54.00 _ 6.01 MEH SUBTOTAL - 52.90 MEH y- DUCT HEAT LOSS 52.90209, X .10 , _ 9.27 MBH ' IMLTRATION 31800.00 X 0.0108 X 37.00" = 12.71 MBH bCQTPANCY LOAD -SENSIBLE 10 ' X. 225 = 2.25 MEH ' •" KITCHEN E UIR4ENT LOAD - .. 'i 1.20 MBH .• TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 76.20 MEH W = 76.22 MBH N = '78.33 MSH E = 75.24 'MEH + GRAND TOTAL IOAD S = 115.45 MBH W = 115.48 MEH N - 118.68 MSH E = 114.01 MBH MAXInM 'IONS S = 9.62 TONS W = 9,62 TONS N = 9.89 TONS E = 9.50 TONS s . i f i 4 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y 'LRACP 31202 IA 9JINIA JOB N[ 43M 040796 ` 1. - BUILDIW. SUn-SW '. ` - 2. - GLAZING SUNUARY 3. " CF-1R - OOMPI.IANCB SPATFNIENP 4. C-2R c BUnDING DESIGN . 5. FORM 3R - CALOIIAMCN OF FMT MANSFER COEFFICIENTS ` 6. FORM 4R - HEATING LOAD_CALCaATION s 7. FORM 5R - COOLING LOAD CALCiIIATION BASED ON LSGRr MAPFS ON ALL WIMOVE . 8. FORM 6R - COOL NG LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON NO DRAPES 1 � S BUILDING SUMMARY. RANG D SANTAt•P1 PLAN 4Y, TRACT 31202 r t - JOB NUMBER 040796 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 r . NEW ATTIC AIL• R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 i PEJY= I QSULATTGN NONE GLASS FILE -NUMBER 28 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TTC VALVE PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS OONFIGURATLCN: + f PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE LOW E GLASS THZOU24DIOT EQOLR it SIZING REQuumm LB: NEW EQUIRIENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE C37TRACIUR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING RBQUIREP4•ISTS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUIIDING HEATING LOAD OF 50120 ERR. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE BOLL OWIM: FURNACE AFUE = 80.00% AIR 03MITICNER SEER = 12.00 WATER FAA= EF = STANDARD 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE E)QAIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY FNGR== IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUISVONT SELECTION; JWREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST FE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FOHI4S 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CAIIZIIATICFIS. THE FOLLOWING SELECiTONS ARE FCR REFEREE ONLY. EQUIPMENT (NY MAKE mom FSTU/HR FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT 311JAV036110 89000 EACH E(Uc IPMR T QTY MAKE ' MODEL TONS AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) BRYANT 563C048-A 4.0 AIR CONDITIONER 2 (1) f ElRYANT 563C060-A 5.0 EQUIPMENTQIy MAKE MOJ➢EL GALLONS BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMEIRICIN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 RESULTS: ammaANcE IS EASED ON THE WORST CASE PERbORMAISCE ANALYSIS METHOD. NORTH FACING RESULT = 45.76 EAST FACING RESULT = 44.67 SOUTH FACING RESULT = 45.85 WEST FACING RESULT = 44.66 WORST CASE RESULT = 45.85 BUX;ET = 46.29 f • ' 4 t t GLASS SUMMARY RANQHD SANTABA PLAN 4Y, TRACT 31202 , JOB NUMBER 040796 FRAMING OPENING GLAZnZ SHADING NUM ORIENII•ATION Wi= HEIGHT W1AIDfYA. TYPE .. MATERIAL TYPE TYPE OEVICE 1 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 2 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIM DUAL 3 FRONT 1.50. 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REKXIIAR i VINYL SLIDER DUAL 5" FRM?r 2.00 7.00 REGU1AR VINYL FIXED DUAL 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED DUAL 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REaffm VINYL SLIDER DUAL 8 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RECSJIAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 9 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGU AR VINYL +SLIDER IAAL 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 P33ULAR VINYL BI7)tE•D DUAL 12 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 13 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HINGED DUAL 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR, VINYL FIXED DUAL • 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 16 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 17 REAR 5.00 1.50 P33ULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 18 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DAL 19 REAR '5.00 1.50 REGUU%R , VINYL SLIDER DUAL 20 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDIm GLASS DOOR- VINYL SLIDER DUAL 21 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL • 22 REAR 6.60 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, 23 REAR 6.00 5.00 REl] AR VINYL FIXED DUAL 24 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 25 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 27 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 R03ULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, - 30 LEFT 2.00, 1.50 RFGWAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL. 31 FRONT 3.00 5.00 RDGJLAR VINYL SLIM DUAL 32 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 33 RIGHT 6.00. 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR , WOOD HINGED DUAL t t n . t ( RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R ------------------------------------------------------- - P-oject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 l oject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check /.Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date c imate Zone........... 15 f --------------------- (-ompliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ' ------------------- Conditioned Floor Area..... 3180 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 , Number of Stories........ . 1 Floor Construction Type.... Slab'On Grade Glazing Percentage......... 20.3 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC......... 0.35 Average Ceiling Height..:.. 10 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION c mponent Frame Cavity Sheathing Total Assembly Type Type R-value R-value R-value, U-factor Location/Comments -------------- ------------------------ ------------ I'-of ------- n/a -------- R-30 -------- R-n/a R-30. .0.035 New Attic Ceil S ll n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.088 New Ext Wall 44a11 n/a R-13 R-n/a R-13 0.083•New Gypboard W S1abEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a, F2=0.720 Covered• abEdge n/a R-0 R-n/a F2=0.550 At Garage FENESTRATION Over - Area U-. Interior Exterior hang/ ^rientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading Shading Fins ------------------- ..indow Right (W) ----- 25.0 ------ --------------------- 0.400 0.360 Standard -----=-------- Standard ----- Yes Window Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.360 -Standard Standard Yes indow Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350+Standard Standard Yes indow Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes -oor Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes indow Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360,-Standard Standard Yes window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes window Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0:350 Standard Standard Yes C RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 2 CF-1R - -------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 MICROPAS6.v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM CF-1R i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN'4Y FENESTRATION ------------ Over Area U- Interior Exterior hang/ orientation (sf) Factor SHGC Shading ''Shading Fins -------------------- 'indow Right (W) ----- 4.5 ------ ------ 0.400 0.360 --------------- Standard -------------- Standard ----- Yes ..'indow Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes loor Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 7.5 '0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes raindow Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 Standard , Standard Yes indow Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ,.indow Back (S) 25.6 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 Standard ,Standard Yes poor Right (W) "48.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 30.0 0.360' 0.350 Standard ' Standard Yes Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes 'indow Left (E) 25.0 0.4'00 0.360 Standard Standard Yes ..indow Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Left (E) 3.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes indow Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 Standard Standard Yes "oor Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 Standard Standard Yes Lquipment Minimum Type Efficiency F rnace 0.800 AFUE ACSplitTXV 12.00 SEER SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) ------ Standard'Slab 3180 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Refrigerant; Tested ACCA Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Airflow Location R-value Leakage D ------------------ n/a Attic Yes Attic. R-4.2 Yes No R-4.2 -Yes No Thermostat Type SetBack SetBack l ;RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 3 CF=1R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08./05 08:44:23 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92. Program -FORM CF-1R, User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equipment Type ------------------ - - - - - - Furnace / ACSplitTXV DUCT TESTING DETAILS -------------------- Duct Measured Supply Leakage Target Duct Surface Area (% fan CFM/CFM25) I (ft2) ------------------ ----------------- 6% / 133.6 n/a WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation ,ank Type, Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------------------------------------ -------------- ---------------- vdater Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** ''his is a multiple orientation building with no orientation restrictions. its printout is for the front facing North. This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Lis building incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) or a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning stem(s) HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** ***-CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** ^"-.is building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Target CFM leakage lues measured at 25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING DETAILS above u. may be.calculated as documented on the,CF-6R. If the measured CFM is above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce i .e duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the c mpliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary r Tested Duct Leakage. This building -incorporates either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) i 1 -,RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 4 CF-1R ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO.SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05'08 44:23 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 -Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run=RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION --------.------------------ - a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning •stem(s). If a.cool-ing system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary for the RCA or TXV. } REMARKS :AK SENSIBLE LOAD:165 MBH ' N ' � r r t r 1 5 Y ' • r j i 1 ;RTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 5 CF-1R ------------------------------------------------- - Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 ---------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92, Program -FORM CF-1R i User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building -features andperformance specifications' needed to comply with Title-24', Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code. of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. When this certificate of compliance is submitted for a single building plan to be built in multiple orientations, any shading feature that is varied is indicated -in the Special Features Modeling Assumptions section. DESIGNER or OWNER' DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Address. 78-401 HWY 111 #F LA QUINTA CA 92253 Phone... (760) VIIN 7-9920 License. Signed.. ENF Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... AGENCY Signed. (date.) Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry Engineering Address. 180 E Main St Ste 150 Tustin, CA 92680 . Phone... (7r4) 838-1124 Signed.. 71/ (dat ) 4 1 n OMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 1 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 Project Address ........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------- - ----------- LA QUINTA *v6.01* Lotumentation"Author ... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 180 E Main St Ste 150 Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date r'imate Zone.......... 15 --------------------- ,mpliance Method...... MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ----------------------------------------------- --=--------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- MICROPAS6 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (kBtu/sf-yr) - Design ---------- Design ---------- Margin = ---------- _ ----------------------- = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2.39 0.38 = = Space Cooling.......... 34.56" 34.41 0.15 = = Water Heating.......... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = = North Total 46.29 45.76 0.53 = = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2..63 0.14 =, = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 33.08 1.48 = = Water Heating........... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = = East Total 46.29 44.67 1.62 = = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2.77 0.00 = = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 34.12 0.44 = = Water Heating......... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = = South Total 46.29 45.85 0.44 = = Space Heating.......... 2.77 2.32 0.45 = = Space Cooling.......... 34.56 33.38 1.18 = = Water Heating.. ....... 8.96 8.96 0.00 = = West Total 46.29 44.66 1.63 = *** Building complies.with Computer Performance *** • i 1 IMPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 2 C-2R Project Title.:........ RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 ------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering' Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area....'. 3180 sf Building Type........ .. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Building.Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,,W Number of Dwelling Units,.. 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... I ReducedYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height,—_ Slab On Grade 1 31800 cf 3180 sf 20.3 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor, # of Vent Vent Air Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height. Area' Leakage ne Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) (sf) Credit HOUSE .esidence 3180 31800 1.00 Yes SetBack 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES Area LT- Insul Act Solar Form 3 Location/ Surface (sf) factor R-val Azm Tilt Gains Reference Comments F USE Roof 3180 0.035 30 n/a 0 Yes None New Attic Ceil 2 Wall 347 0.088 13 180 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 670 0.088 13 270 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 340 0.088 13 0 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 740 0.088 13 90 90 Yes None New Ext Wall Wall 162 0.083 13 0 90 No None New Gypboard W '-)MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY + Page 3 C-2R ------------------------------------------------ r-roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 ------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Length F2 Insul Solar Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Location/Comments ------------ HOUSE -------------- I ------- ----- ---------------------- 7 S1abEdge 272 0.720 R-0 No Covered 8 S1abEdge 16 0.550 R-0 No At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Area U- • Act Exterior Shade Interior Shade nrientation •-------------------- (sf) factor ----- ----- SHGC Azm Tilt ----- --- ---- Type/SHGC Type/SHGC ---------------------------- _JUSE 1 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.350 0 90 4 Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 - Window Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.350 0 90 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.350 0 90 i Window Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.360.270. 90 R Window Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.360 270 90 Window Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.350 270 90 Window Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.360 270 90 11 Window Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.350 90 90 14 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360.180 90 Window Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 18 Window` Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 Window Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.360 180 90 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 270 90 21 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 .- Window Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.360 180 90 Window Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.350 180 90 24 Window Back (S) 9.0 0.4.00 0.360 180 90 2q Window Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.360 90 .90 Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 L. Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 28 Window Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.360 "90 90 < Window Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 Window Left (E) 3.0 0.400 0.360 90 90 31 Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 _ Window Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.360 0 90 _ Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.350 270 90 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.76 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0..68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 Standard/0.68 )MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 4 C-2R Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERHANGS AND SIDE FINS ---Window-- ------Overhang----- ---Left Fin ------- Right Fin -- Area Left Rght Surface (sf) Wdth Hgth Dpth Hght Ext Ext Ext Dpth ---- Hght ---- Ext ---- Dpth ---- Hght ---- ----------- 1 'USE ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 Window 6.0 4 1.5. 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5 Window 14.0 2 7 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a '7 Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a, n/a -n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 2 n/a. n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Door 24.0 3 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a .,n/a n/a n/a n/a 15 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a` n/a `n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a, n/a n/a n/a n/a_•n/a n/a n/a Window 7.5 5 1.5, 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a' n/a n/a 19 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Door 48.0 6 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a. n/a ,n/a n/a Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 22 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a -- Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 20 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a- 26 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 29 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 3.0 2 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a. n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Door 48.0 6 8 1 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a )MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 5 C-2R Project Title:......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 -------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92 Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y System Type ------------ nJUSE Furnace LCSplitTXV SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) HOUSE Standard Slab 3180 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------- Refrigerant Tested ACCA Minimum ..Charge and Duct Duct Duct Manual Duct Efficiency Airflow Location R-value Leakage D Eff ------------------------------------------------------- ---- 0.800'AFUE n/a Attic 12.00 SEER Yes Attic Equipment Type ------------------------ HOUSE Furnace / ACSplitTXV DUCT TESTING DETAILS -------------------- Duct Leakage Target (% fan CFM/CFM25) ------------------ 6% / 133.6 WATER HEATING SYSTEMS R-4.2 Yes R-4.2 Yes Measured Supply Duct" Surface Area (ft2) . ----------------- n/a No 0.815 No 0.703 Number Tank External in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Heater Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value fater Heater to meet minimum CEC Standards SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to. manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during.plan check and field inspection. *** '.,:is is a multiple orientation building -with no orientation restrictions. This printout is for the front facing North. pis building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. pis building incorporates either Tested.Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) • a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the specified air conditioning system(s) . -)MPUTER METHOD SUMMARY Page 6 C-2R ---------- -------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..02/08/05 08:44:23 MICROPAS6 v6.01 File-S0407960 Wth-CTZ15S92, Program -FORM C-2R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ***.Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods.and *** *** must be reported on the CF-6R installation certificate. *** This building incorporates Tested Duct Leakage. Target CFM leakage clues measured at 25 pascals are shown in DUCT TESTING DETAILS above may be calculated as documented on the CF-6R. If the measured CFM is above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce }he duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the >mpliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary for Tested Duct Leakage. its building incorporates. either Tested Refrigerant Charge and Airflow (RCA) or a Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV) on the'specified air conditioning rstem(s)..If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification not necessary for the RCA or TXV. REMARKS r i 040796 HEAT TRANSFER COEFF I C I E N T S FORM .3R HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT . PROPOSED OCNSM=CN ASSEMBLY PRLU£CT RANCHO SANIANA PLAN 4Y LOCATICN TRACP 31202 CITY, IA.QUINTA OWNER DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF O XJSIRUCTIC N OaIRUSENTS R C3Z�CN ASSEMBLY New Ext Wall 1 R13 Standard Wall (160c) 11.360 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 .. 0.000 - - 0 TOTAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 11.360 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFF awr (U 0.088 B'IU/(HR.FI2.OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.088 BTU/(HR.M OF) WEIGIT OF ASSEMBLY 4.700 LIST OF [I\SIFDCTICIV 026CUEPTS R OMZM UCTTON ASSEMBLY New Gypboard Wall 1 5/8 In. G)pboard 0.500 2 R13 Wall (2x4 16oc) 9.760 3 1/2 In. Gypboard 0.450 4 .. Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 5 Wall Inside Air Film 0.680 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 0.000 10 0.000 0 TOTAL TESL RESISTANCE (RT) 12.070 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT (U 0.083 BTU/ (HR.FI2. OF) U CARRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.083 STU/(HR.M. OF) WEIGHT OF ASSEMBLY 0.000 LIST OF 02-16 IR.TIC N CCMPC VENTS R iOfLSIA =CN ASSEMBLY New Attic Ceiling 1 R30 Standard Roof (Attic 16oc) 28.570 2 0.000 3 0.000 4 0.000 5 0.000 6 0.000 7 0.000 8 0.000 9 ". 0.000 10 0.000 - - 0 TCIIAAL THERMAL RESISTANCE (RT) 28.570 . 1/RT, OVERALL HEAT TRANSFERCOEFFICIENT (U 0.035 BTU/(HR.FT2. OF) U CORRECTED WITH FRAMING FACTOR 1 0.035 BTU/(HR.FT2. OF) 040796 HEATING LOAD CALCULATION FORM ,4 R PROJECT RANCHO SANIANA PLAN 4Y LOCATICN TRACT 31202 CITY LA QUINIA OWNER DESERT ELITE L1ATE: 11-16-04 HOURLY HEAT LOSS E SIGN TEMPERAT[IRE DIFFERENCE FOR ALL CONDITIONS OTHER THAN THE FOLLOWING: 70 - 31 LINE 1. 39 FOR INSULATED FLOOR OVER VENTED WGk7ED SPACE L,I1/2 L 2. = 19.5 FCR LIIM61Z ED FLOOR OVER VENTED UNHEATED SPACE LIDIE 2 - 5 F L. 3. = 14.5 CIkV[.UC.ITVE HEAT 'IOSS AREA, FT 2 OR. U FROM FORM TW FROM DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY LFNGIH' FT. 3,TABLE 4-1 LOAD CLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 5323.5 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 108.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 2538.9 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 51.50 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 1205.1 SIIJ/HR (LASS L DOUBLE PANE 114.00 X 0.600 X 39.00 = 2667.6 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.580 X 39.00 = 1085.8 BTU/HR GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 48.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 692.6 BTU/HR GLASS F DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X 39.00 = 346.3 BIU/HR GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 24.00 X 0.370 X '39.00 = 346.3 BTU/HR New Ext Wall 2097.50 X 0.088 X 39.00 = 7200.9 BTU/HR New Gypboaxd Wall 161.60 X 0.083 X 39:00 = 522.2 BTU/HR New Attic Ceiling 3180.60 X 0.035 X 39.00 = 4340.9 BIU/HR Carpet W/ Rubber Pad 0.00 X 12.930 X 1.00 = 3517.1 BTU/HR Perimeter At Garage (R7 Equiv) 0.00 X 9.268 X 1.00 = 149.8 BTU/HR 'SUBTOTAL 4 = 29937.0 BTU/HR INFILTRATION (ENTER 0 ON L. 6 IF THERE IS NO POSITIVE VENTILATION) 3180.0 FT2 X 10.0 FT X .0126 X 39.0 OF LINE 5 = 15626.5 BTU/HR GROSS FLOOR AREA WMCHIED AVG. CEILING HEIGHT I FRCM TABLE 3-7 DIW F%M LINE SUBTOTAL 7 = 45563.5 BTU/HR IX7CT HEAT LOSS (ENTER 0 ON LINE 8 IF THERE ARE NO DUCTS) 0.10 X L 7 I= 8 = 4556.3 STU/HR TOTAL (LDS 7+ 8) I9= 50119.8 BTU/HR 040796 COOLING LOAD, :CALCULATION FORM 5 R ASHRAE. HOLMY FEAT GAIN, # BUILDING COOLING LOAD CALCULATION BASED ON LIGHT DRAPES ON ALL WII•WAS PRLI7ECT RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y IDC4TION TRACT 31202 a CITY LA QUINTA i ONOTER DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 SL344 R OUTSIDE TEMPERATJRE MINLE INSIDE TEMPERAT[IF2E 112 - 75 =• 37 • DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TD - TOAD SQ FT S W N E S W N E GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 23.80 53.80 31.80 53.80 = 5.41 5.41 7.23 12.24 MSH GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 204.50 X 54.60 32.60 54.60 24.60 = 11.17 11.17 11.17 5.03 KE CLASS F DOUBLE PANE . 75.50 X 33.40 55.40 25.40 55.40 = 2.52 2.52 1.92 4.18 MT GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 138.00 X 56.20 26.20 56.20,. 34.20 = 7.76 7.76 7.76 4.72 MSR DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TD TOAD DOOR 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 = 0.01 vim New Ext Wall 2097.50 X 0.088 X n 33.60 _ 6.20 MBH ' New Gypboard Wall 161.60 X 0.083 X 33.60 = 0.45 MBH New Attic Ceiling .3180.00 X 0.035 X 54.00 = 6.01 MBH SUBTOTAL = 40.75 MBH DUCT HEAT LASS 40.74882 X .10 = 7.14 MBH INFILTRATION 31800.00 X 0.0108 X 37.00 = 12.71 MBH OCCUPANCY LOAD - SENSIBIE 12 X 225 = 2.70 MBH EIM N EQUIPM NI•LOAD = 1.20 MSH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 63.28 MEH W = 63.13 MSH N = 64.50 MEH E = 62.59 MBH GRAND TOTAL LOAD ' S 95.88 MSH W = 95.65, MBH N = 97.72 MBH E = 94.84 MEET MAXIMLM TC NS S 7.99 TC NS W = 7.97 TONS N = 8.14 TONS E 7. 90 ' TCNS i r _ • - � F 040796 COOLING LOAD CALCULATION FORM 6R ' ASI-RAE HOURLY HEAT GAIN, # BUILDIW. COOLIM LOAD CALCULATION BASED C N NO DRAPES PROJECT RANI) SANTANA PLAN 4Y LOCATION TRACT 31202 • CITY- - LA QUINIA - ORE R DESERT ELITE DATE: 11-16-04 SUNhMER OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE MINUS INSIDE 'IEDSERAMAM 112 - 75 = 37 . . a DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY AREA ASHRAE TO LOAD �E SQ FT S W N E S W N " GLASS R DOUBLE PANE 227.50 X 30.80 79.80% 44.80 79.80 = 7.01 7.01 10.19a 18.15 MEE GLASS Rt DOUBLE PANE 204.50 X 80.60 45.60 80.60 31.60 = 16.48 16.48 16.48 6.46 MEH CLASS F DOUBLE PANE 75.50 X 46.40 81.40 32.40 81.40 = 3.50 3.50 2.45 6.15 MSH GLASS L DOUBLE PANE 138.00 X 82.20 33.20 82.20 47.20 = 11.34 11.34 11.34 6.51 MBH Y y - DESCRIPTION OF ASSEMBLY SIZE U VALUE ASHRAE TO LOAD DOOR 1.00 X 0.330 X 33.60 = 0.01 MBH New Ext Wall 2097.50 X 0.088 X 33.60 = 6.20 ,MSH New GypUoaYd Wall 161.60 X 0.083 X 33.60 = e+ + 40.45 MBH New Attic Ceiling 3180.00 X 0.035 X 54.00 = 6.01 MSH SUBTOTAL = 53 `14 MBH DUCT HEAT LOSS 53.13982 X .10 = 9.31, MBH • 7NFILTRAT W 31800.00 X 0.0108 X 37.00 = r 12.71 M8H OCX NANCY LOAD - SENSIBLE 12 X 225 = 2.70 MBH KIMEN EQUIPMENT I= = 1.20 MBH TOTAL SENSIBLE LOAD S = 76.93 MEH W = 76.80 MBH N = 79.06 MSH E = 75.87 MEH GRAND TOTAL I= S = 116.56 MSH W = 116.36 MBE N = 119.78 ' MBH E = 114.95 - MBH MAXIMUM TCNS S 9.71'- TONS W = 9.70 TONS - N = 9.98 TONS E,= 9.58 TONS r V 4 034459 (WSIadden'Engineering 6782 Stanton. Ave.-, Suite A , 39-'725 .Garand Ln., Suite: G 11.4 S. California Ave. 15438 Cholane Road Buena Park, CA 90621 Palm Desert, CA 92211 : Beaumont, CA 92223 .'Victorville,-CA 92392 (714) 523-0952 (760) 772-3893 (951) 845-7743 760-962-1868 . Fax (714)523-1369, ' Fax (760) 772-3895 Fax' (951') 845-8863 Fax 760-'962-1878 Date FIELD MEMO Job No. 17 Project'Name %,, l�l)�" �c. �, Client: Site_Address. F1(le Job Phone Work Done 0 •-Test_Summary /; r Test No. Location Elev. Dry Density Moist % % Relative. Compaction ;Ref. Max pcf Moist %94 — D z - _. v� v� V\ V\ v \ V Comments ! 1/ r ' l� %�jl� •y�'7 ,'1 �/ i'i� lam✓-� (_ (l� �.C. /% /fv`-/l l—f� �' � /� b- eAw / ,._ Uf' /fit ( rX �a ,` // 1 l/.1111 6, _`-c 7 Field'.Tech.. S4iper..or. Agent 24 hour notice requested to schedule Field Technician.<Thank:.you Jort a opportunity. to be of service.. Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc. 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 941-2990 - (714) 526-8441 - Fax (562) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT SWIT Job No. it, Date 1-3-10-06 TYPE OF N' Reinforced Concrete ❑ Strcicturat Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control INSPECTION ❑ Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other REQUIRED ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt Job Address Y l T Mon t-oe city al Job Name �e � 9Type WC+ Permit No. Iss ed By of Structure Architect Material Description (tyW. gLacle. urce) n a Engineer % Contractor Inspector(s) Name i Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES ` 3 , _T INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & [DENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. OD I 2 < 11 L ', "'JI. "'� , "'�' t' b "c - ' L 4, S a � ( 'qit d I CERTIFICATION OF. COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. i SIG TU OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ PAGE OF TIME IN TIME OUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS CYLINDERS All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved by Project Superintendent WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - 10B SITE COPY Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc. 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562)9414990 • (714) 526-8441 • Fax (562)946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT swl `,I°p No. Date TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED Reinforced Concrete ❑ Strcictural Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control 0 Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt Job Address „ WY7 ra* City Job Name I UVI Permit No. Issued By Type of Structure Architect Material Description (typ rode. urce) 000 p w Engineer Contractor ar Inspector(s) Name Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. D Goo �' r 13 �i-rd � r t r !� r i eQ' . / �` �v ohipe ` f '-n 41v,Z 2' 10 /3 r74 2J0S0 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. SIGN4TUf OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ PAGE OF TIME IN TIME OUT I REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS CYLIN]an All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be hour minimum. Approved by Project Superintendent WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY O/- i3-&'G Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc. -'^ 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 941-2990 - (714) 526-8441 - Fax (562) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT 40 SWIT JUk ob No. � e TYPE OF offReinforced Concrete ❑ Strcictural Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control INSPECTION ❑ Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other REQUIRED ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt Job Address City Na IL Job Name aAAkP �ItZl jZ a Permit No. sued By Type of Structure �"Fp Architect aterial Description (type. grade, source) Engineer Contractor Inspector(s) Name JOL r Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES Cal C- lydler— were, INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT- AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. 1 �a� o° js ,4 jc i 4 WHO 6 At, I A a, 0 d l a; o �� y I ,� �--� ,6 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILD G LAWS. L- SIGNATURE OFRE&ITCREDINSPECTOR SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ PAGE OF TIME IN TIME OUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS 60,0 /600 g z All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimu Approved by Project Superintendent WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 562--941-2990 714--526-8441 Fax-562-946-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS --- ASTM C31, C 138, C 143, , C 172, C 173, C231, C 1064 ---- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: C r` ]'ZING STAR LANE, JOB #: 40116 DATE: 63/21/2006 JOB NAME: _a ql _ _ FZgj PERMIT # : �05-51 19 ISSUED BY : LAG?U I NTA A RCH I TECT CSOUTH C[IIST ARCH ENGINEER: RAYMOND F RANG I E STRUCTURAL_ ENG. CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL_ CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 3120E-2, 33076--1 / LOT # 12 /FOOTINGS & SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: COACHELLA MIX #: 941.67 TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 71484 SLUMP : 4" WATER ADDED:- 0 GAL AIR TEMP:.63 F,. CONCRETE TEMP: 69 F MIXING TIME -50 MIN' TIME CAST: 9 : 10 AM DATE CAST: 2/16/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/17/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 602271 : 602271 : 602271 AGE: DAYS 7 . 28 . 28 DATE TEST : 2/23/2006 : 3/16/2006 : 3/16/2OO6 SIZE -IN. : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 AREA--SQ.IN. 28.27 . 28.27 g 28.27 . CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 90760 . 127100 124400 COMP-STR. -PSI. : 3210 - : 4495 : 4400 I H/D CORR FACTOR CORR. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.. T. M. USED : FORNEY : R I EHL-E : R I EHLE REMARKS: . ASTM C399 C 174, C102, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY 2 THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT Ill FULL- WITHOUT THE APROVAI_ OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ' ,30UTIEST I NJCT I ON AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone REtdAN R:'"CRUZ. - LAB. MANAGER B= cone and split C= cone D=shear -E=columnar SOUTHWEST INSPECT I -ON -AND, TESTING I NC. 1082E S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe. Springs, 'CA 90670 " 562--941-2790 714--02F -8441 Fax-562-94E-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS -- ASTM Q31, C138, C 1 LF3,• C 172, C 173, C231 , C 1064 --- 1 CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRE:TE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRES-'1c_ L` E JOB' #: 40116 DATE: 03/27/2006 JOB NAMEMPUT A_I R R.U.N • PERMIT # 0.5-51 J 1 ISSUED BY.; LA QU I NTA ARCHITECT: -SOUTH COAST ARCH ENGINEER: RAYMOND FRANGIE'STRUCTURAL ENG. CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBEL_L CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202-2, 33076-1 / L.OT # 11 / FOOTINGS R SLAB -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONCRETE SUPPLIER- ,DESERT RDY MX PLANT- COACHELLA MIX It- 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE:' TICKET ##: 71402 SLUMP : 4 1/2" WATER ADDED:' '0 GAL AIR TEMP: 69 F �. CONCRETE TEMP: 74-F MIXING TIME: 50 MIN TIME CAST:' 8:30 AM DATE CAST: 2/15/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB. 2/16/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I. E LAB IDENTIFICATION . 602273 . 602273 . 602273 AGE DAYS . 7 . 28 28 DATE TEST : 2/22/2006-,- 3/15/2006 : 3/15/2006 SIZE -IN. : 6.000X12' : 6.000X12 : 6.00OX12 AREA-Sf?, I N. .28.27 . 28.27 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 93880 : 132700 136100 COMP--ST R. -PS 1. : 3320 469 : +4810 I H/D CORR FACTOR - CORR. STR. -F'SI TIME TESTED BREAK. TYPE C.T.M. USED FORNEY : R I EHLE : - R I EHL_E REMARKS : ~ ASTM C39, C174, • , C192, C4.70, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL_ WITHOUT THE APROVAL. OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. SO TI-IWI t� TI NSF'E ION ANDTESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: LL f RENAN R. LZ LAB.. MANAGER - ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone and split' C= cone D=shear. E=coll:tmnar, SOUTHWEST .INSPECTION AND TESTING' INC. , 10826.S. Norwalk #A s Santa.Fe Springs„ CA 90670 562--941--2990 714--526-8441 Fax--562--946-0026 .•F I EL_D DATA ON TESL- SPECIMENS . ' t --- ASTM ' C31 „ C 138„ C143V C172, C 173„ C231 „ C 1064' "-- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: 2 SHI1N=I1NGr-S�GAR�#.ANE JOB #: 40116 DATE: 03/27/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: 05--5118 ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST ARCH_ ENGINEER:'RAYMOND FRANGIE STRUCTURAL ENG. CONTRACTOR: L.ENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: T R 31202•-2, 33076--1 / LOT # 10 / FOOTINGS & SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX• PLANT: COACHELLA MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #:-71423 SLUMP : 4 1/2'' WATER ADDED: 0 CAL AIR TEMP: 75 F CONCRETE TEMP: 77 F MIXING TIME: 77 MIN TIME CAST: 10:35 AM DATE CAST: 2/15/2006. •{ RECEIVED AT LAB: 2416/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I- E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 602274 : 602274• : 602274 AGE DAYS 7 . 28 . 28 DATE TEST : 2/22/200S : 3/15/2006 : 3/15/2006 SIZE —IN. : '6.000X12 : 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 AREA--SV IN. . 28.27 28. 27 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD—LBS : 99060 : 142300 : 140500 COMP—STR. —PSI . . 3500 1 5030, . 4970 . CORR FACTOR CORK. STR. —PSI' . . . TIME TESTED . . . BREAK, TYPE A C. T. M. USED :w FORNEY : RIEHLE : RIEHLE REMARKS: ASTM C39, „C174, C1;2, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES X ,.DOES NOT COMPLY THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED„ EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWWT INSPEC ION AND TESTING_, SAMPLES -CAST BY OTHERS: • RE-NAN R. [; 2, LAB. MANAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B== cone and split C= cone D=shear E=columnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND • TESTING INC. 1082E S. -Norwalk #A Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 ' 562--941-2990 - 714--526-8441 Fax-562-946-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS - --- ASTM C31, C 138, C 143, C l 72, C 173, C231, ' C 1064 CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE:' CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS. , _ fd�f1PFAVE JOB #: , 40116 DATE:' 03/`4/c006 JOB NAME: OUAIL'RUN PERMIT #: ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITEtTe a ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR:•LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL,CONCRETE OF CALIF. --_•------------------------------------•--------•------------------•------------------•----- LOCATION.IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202--2, 33076--1 / LOT # FOOTINGS & SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: COACHELLA MIX A 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : V _ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69909 ,SLUMP o 4'' WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 58 F CONCRETE TEMP: 68 F MIXING TIME: 55 MIN TIME CAST: 7:55 AM' DATE CAST: 2/14/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/15/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK 'SPECIFIED,PAI: 4000' FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B 1 C I D I E LAB I DENT I F, I CATION 602270 : 602270 602270 AGE DAYS . -T. . 28 . 28 DATE TEST, : 2/21/`OO6 : 3/14/2006 : 3/14/2006 SIZE —IN. : 6.000X12 : 6.000X1E : 6.000X12 , AREA--SQ. IN. 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 •CRUSH LOAD—LBS : 85050 : 123350 . 126870 COMP—STR. -PS,I. j010 : 4360 : 4490 I H/D . . CORR FACTOR . . . . CORK. STRo —PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE _ C.T.M. USED : FORNEY- FORNEY : FORNEY REMARKS: ASTM C39, C174, C192, � C47p, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: F THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCaED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE'APROVAL OF SIT! ------- _ ------------ •--------•---.---_—_.------------- -----__•------•-----------•------------------•--- RESPECTFULL..Y . SUBM I TTED SOUTHWEc' INSPECT ON AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY .OTHERS: R - NAN R`o C , I_AB. MANAGER .ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone 'B= cone and ,split ;C= cone. D=shear,* E=columnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe•Springs„ CA 90670 56E--941--2990 714-526-8441 Fax-562-946-•-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS (} _ —•—•—• AST M C31q C138, E143l CL_ 17, CL.a.� 173, C.1, 'C1064 ,___ CONCRETE: X GROUT: .MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: JOB #: 4011E DATE: 04/03/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: 05-5180 ISSUED BY: I__A OUINTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST -ARCH. ENGINEER: RAYMOND FRANGIE STRUCTURAL ENG. CONTRACTOR:_LENNAR HOMES SUB••CONTRACTOR: CAMPBF_L_L_ CONCRETE OF -CALIF. --------------- LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31 c OL-2, 33076-1 / LOT # 62 / FOOT I NGS - R SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX• PLANT: # 2 MIX #: 94167 TYRE OF CEMENT : V f ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 70456 SLUMP :A" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 83 F CONCRETE TEMP: 79 F MIXING TIME: 112 MIN TIME CAST: 11:50 AM ----------------- DATE CAST: 2/23/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/24/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 .FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 602750 602750 : 602750 AGE DAYS 7 28 28 DATE TEST 3/2=/2006 3/23/2006 . 3/22/2006 SIZE -IN. : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 AREA-SU. IN. 28.27 .. 28. 27 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 80390 . 122690 . 125800 COMP--ST R. -PSI; : 2840 P 4340 v 4450 i H/D CORR FACTOR . . . CORK. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED 'BREAK TYPE C. Te M. USED : FORNEY RIEHLE : RIEHLE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REMARKS: ' ASTM C39, 074, C192, C470, C617, C42' COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE: APROVAL. OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: �f . RENAN R. C�, LAB. MAN ` E_ r ASTM C39 BREAKS A.-: cone' A cone and split C= cone D=shear E=co1umnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 108226S. Nar,wa l k+ #A San t.a F c c'S pr, i nq s, CA 90670- 562-941-E990 714. 526-8441 Fax- 56c--94F -00E6 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS --- ASTM C31, C 1 �8, • C 14,_,, C 17c, C 1 73, C1 231, C 1064 CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR.: SHOTCRETE: CORES-. GUNITE: ADDRESSMH" SAN7-AN- T1�IVE JOB #: 40116 DATE: 04/03/2006 JOB -NAME: OUA I L RUN PERMIT # - 05-5179 ISSUED "LAY - LA QU I NTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST ARCH ENGINEER:.RAYMOND FRANGIE STRUCTURAL ENG. , CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR; CAMPBEL_.L CONCRETE.OF CALIF.' L_OCAT I ON I N STRUGTU RE : TR 31202-2, 33076-- 1 ' / LOT # 6 i / FOOTINGS R SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT" RDY MX - PLANT.- It ` MIX. it- 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT -' V ADMIXTURE-* TICKET #: 70440 SLUMP : 4 1 /2" WATER -ADDED: 0 GAL AIR. TEMP: 72 F CONCRETE TEMP: 67 F MIXING TIME: 26 MINTIME CAST': 9:05 AM ' DATE CAST: 2/23/2006 RECF_.IVED AT LAB: 2/`4/E006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C, I D. I E LAB IDENTIFICATION :.602751 - 602751 : 602751 AGE DAYS . '7 . 2'8 28 DATE _ TEST , 3/2/E006 3/23/2006 . 3/23/2006 SIZE --IN. : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 - •6.000X12 AREA--SQ. IN. . 28.27 28. 27 t ... 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 76730 : 120990 : 124100 COMP--STR. -PSI. 2710 . 4280 4390 . . . H/D , CORR FACTOR CORR. STR. -PSI TIME.TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED. : FO RNEY - R I EHLE : R I EHLE REMARKS: ASTM C39, ,674, ' . C192, C47171, . C617, C42 COMPLIES:.X DOES NOT, COMPLY - THIS REPORT SHALL_ NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT ,IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL. OF SITI. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWEST INSF='EC ION :AND TESTING ; SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: - //RENAN, R. C Z LAB. `MAN GER - ASTM C39 BREAKS A= rune B cone and s.pli•t C= tune D=shear: E=co1umnar- ^ SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC ' ~ . . INC., 10826 S. Norwalk- #A` .^ ' ,' . Santa Fe Springs,. CA 90670 r. 562-941-2990- ' 714-526-8441 ^ .Fax-562-946-0026 ' FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS ' --- ASTM C31, C138, C143, i 072, C173, C231, C1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: . . . - ' ADDRES ' JOB # 40116' DATE: 04/03/2006 o � JOB NAME: QUAIL RU PERMIT W. 05-5154 ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST ARCH ^ ENGINEER: RAYMOND'FRANGIE STRUCTURAL ENG. CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES . SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE,OF CALIF. --------------------------- n----------- 7______________�_____________-�_________��_ LOCATION N STRUCTURE: TR 31202-2, `33076-1 / LOT ~ 60 / FOOTINGS & SLAB ' ________________________________________________________________________________ CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLA'T: , ' MIX It: 94167 , TYPE OF CEMENT : ADMIXTURE: ` TICKET #: 70357 ' SLUMP : 4'' ` ~ WATER ADDED: 0 GAL' �'. AIR -TEMP: 74 F ' . . ' CONCRETE TEMP:'69F MIXING TIME: 35MIN TIME CAST: 10:00AM ~ ^ . . DATE CAST: 2/22/2006: ' RECEIVED AT LAB! 2/23/2006 SPECIMENS MADE.BY: ' � SPECIFIED PSI: 4000' '. , . FIELD IDENTIFICATION| A |" B | C |' D | E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 602747 :.602747 : 60274.7 AGE DAYS : 7 : 28. : 28 DATE TEST : 3/1/20 ' : 3/22/2006 : 3/22/2006': : SIZE -IN. : 6.000X12 : 6.000X12- 6.000X12 AREA-SQ.IN. : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 92700 : 121280 : 123820 COMP-STR.-PSI; . : 3280' : 4290 : 4380 | H/[) CORR FACTOR CORR.STR._PSI TIME TESTED ' BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED : FORNEY A RIEH'E : RIEHLE . . REMARKS: ------------------------------ ________________ ' ASTM C39, C174, C195, C470, C617, C42 ' COMPLIES: X ' DOES NOT COMPLY: ~ ' THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL.WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI ____________________________________-______________________-__________ RESPECTFULLY D ^ ' AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS:' ' . 'RENAN R.ERC7Z-- LAB. MANAGER . . ' ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone cone -and split C= cone D=shear E=columnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. - 10826 S., Not -walk #A Santa Fe SPr,inQs, CA 9_0G70 562--941--5990 714-526--8441 Fax-56E-946--002E, FIELD DATA ON TEST•SPECIMENS - -- ASTM C31,, C 138, C 143, C 17`, C 173, C2351, C 1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: 1_.Cit- R-ANCHO-SAt�4TAN-faADRIVE JOB #: 40116 DATE-.' 04/03/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: 05-5178 ISSUED BY.: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST -ARCH ENGINEER: RAYMOND FRANGIE STRUCTURAL ENG. CONTRACTOR — L' ENNAk HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CAL I F-. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202-2, 33076,1 / LOT # 59 / FOOTINGS R SLAB -------------------- --------------------- :----------------- ----•----------------------------- CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: MIX #: 9416.7 TYPE OF CEMENT : ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 70341 SLUMP : 4" WATER.ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 74 F ,CONCRETE -TEMP.- 69 F MIXING TIME: 30 MIN- TIME CAST: 8:15 AM DATE CAST: 2/22/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/23/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: SPECIFIED PSI: L+000 .FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A 1 B I C i D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 60:752 : 602752 : 602752 AGE DAYS 7 . 2a . 28 DATE TEST : 3/1/2006 : 3/22/2006 : 3/22/2006 SI7_E -IN. : 6.000X12 : 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 ' AREA--SQ. IN. 28.27 . 28.27 28.27. CRUSH LOAD-LBS . 105460` . 134000 137110 COMP-STR.-PSI. 3730 . 4740 4850 I H/I? CORR FACTOR . . . . •. CORR. STR. -PSI . . . TIME TESTED . . . BREAK, TYPE . . . . C.T.M. USED : FORNEY : R I EHLE : R I EHLE REMARKS. ------------.---.---._--_--.---------------.----------------.-----_-_ ASTM C39, C 174, C 192, C4 i0, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT -COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE•REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL. OF SITI ------------ RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND.TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: RENAN ' R. C� LAB. MANAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone and split • C= cone • D=shear F- =co 1. umnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING`INC. 1082E S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe Springs, 'CA 90670 562--941--E990 714-5* '6--8441 Fax-562-946-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS -- ASTM C31, C 138, C 143, C 17L., C 173, C231, y C 1064 - CONCRETE:,X GROUT: MORTAR SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE:- ADDRESS: ANTFINgA RIVE JOB• 4: 40116 DATE: 03/31/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL_ RUN " PERMIT #-. ISSUED BY: LA QU I NTA ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: .CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMF'BEL_L CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION•IN STRUCTURE: TR 31._0` 33076-1 / LOT # 58 / FOOTINGS &.SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: SLUMP : 4 1/4", WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 79 F CONCRETE TEMP. 77 F MIXING TIME: 30 MIN TIME CAST: 10:05 AM DATE CAST: 2/21/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 222/0006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: TONY FERRIS SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I' B I C I D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION 60274` 1 � : 602749 : 602749 AGE .DAYS 728 28 DATE 1-EST : 2/28/2006 : 3/21/2006 3/21/2006 SIZE -IN. : 6, 00OX12, - : 6. 00OX1E• • : 6. 00OXi2 AREA---SQ.IN. 28.27 . 28.27 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 877b0 : 125600 : 123900 COME='-STRo -PSI. : 3100 : 4440 : 4380 i H/D CORK. FACTOR: CORR,. STR. -PSI a .. TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED : FORNEY : R I EHLE : R I EHLE REMARKS: ASTM C39, C 174, C 192,, C470, C617, C42 COMPI.-. I ES : X . DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED,'EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL_ OF.SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWF'`T INSPEC ION AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: � /0//RENAN R. LAB. MANAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone and split C= cone D=shear' -E=columnar 4 SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC., 108,1=G S. Norwalk #A Santa Fc Sprinq CA 90670 ' 56c_ 941--`990 714--526--8441 Fax--562-946-0026' FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS --- ASTM Cal , C 1 38, C 1 Lf3, C172, C:173, Cc:, l , C 1064°_ -_-- CONCRETE: X. GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE:. CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS7. TttC' - TNDRIVE JOB I#:° 40116 DATE: 03/31/2006 JOB NAME: DUAIL RUN PERMIT #: ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: ° CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES.' SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMRBEI_l_ CONCRETE OF CALIF. ----•---------=-=•----.--_.-=---------------------------------•-------------•----- LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 3120L-2, 33076-=1 / LOT'# 57 /-FOOTINGS & SLAB CONCRETE SUPPLI ER DESERT- RDY Itt_X . PLANT- •MIX # : 9416 7 TYPE OF CEMENT : ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: SLUMP : 4" WATER"ADDED:- 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 78 F CONCRETE TEMP: 76 F• MIXING TIME: 40'MIN .`TIME CAST:"8:30 AM = DATE CAST: 2: 21/2006 'RECEIVED AT,LAB: +2/22/2006 ° SPECIMENS MADE BY: TONY FERRIS '• SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B 'I C I D•., I E LAB IDENTIFICATION 6021'748 60E748 : 60274.8 AGE DAYS 7 2:8 . 28 DATE TEST 2/28/2006 3/21 /2006 3/E1 /E006 -. 'SIZE -IN. 6.000X12 : 6.00OX1E : 6.00OXi2 �• AREA-SQ. IN. _8. 27 . 28.27 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS 79890` : 118400 : 120300 ., COMP--STR. -PSI. . 2825 . 4190' ' . 4255 H/D CORR FACTOR t • CORR. STR.-F'S.T.. TIME` TESTED - BREAK TYPE . . . C.T.M. USED :=FORNEY : RIEHLE : RIEHLE REMARKS ASTM C39, C174, C 192, C470, C617,,- • C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL_ NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT .THE APROVAL OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED , = S0UTiiWE T INSPECT ON AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS RENAN R. C� ~ LAB. MANAGER , ,- ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone Bind, split C= 'cone D=shear -E=colLtmnar - - ^ . . . SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S.`Norwalk #A^ Santa 'e'Springs, CA 90670� 562-941-2990 ' ' 714-526-8441' Fax-562-946-0026 ^ FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS' ^ ` . ^ . --- AS'M C31° .C138, C143, C172', C173,� C231�,`�`C1064` --- '' � � CONCRETE: X GROUT: � MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: . . * ` ADDRESS: I V E ' JOB #: 40116 DATE:, 03/27/2006 JOBNAME:' UN � ' PERMIT #:'05-5187 ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: SOUTH COAST ARCH ENGINEER: RAYMOND FRANGIE STRUCTURAL EN . CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES _�_____________________ SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIF. __ __________��___-______________________-_________�___ _ LOCATIONIN STRUCTURE: TR31265-2, ------------------------------------- __ 33076-1 / LOT -# 56 / FOOTINGS &^SLAB _ __-_________�____-____=____7_________------ CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: COACHE.LA '' MIX |: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT': V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 71508 SLUMP : 4 1/2" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL ^' AIR.TEMPk 68 F ' CONCRETE TEMP: 71 F MIXING TIME: 25 MIN TIME CAST: 11:10 AM ' . ^ ^ DATE CAST: 2/16/2006 . RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/17/2006. ___________________________� SPECIMENS MADE BY: DAWN THEISSEN . ____________ SPECIFIED PST:' 4000 ^ ^ ' FIELD IDENTIFICATION| A |''' B |' � '' C D | . ' E , LAB IDENTIFICATION : 602272 : ` . 60227: . , 26022,72 AGE DAYS _ : 7, : 28 � 28 DATE TEST . : 2/23/2006': 3/16/2006 : 3/16/2006 SIZE -IN. : 6'000X12 : ' 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 AREA-SQ.IN. ' : 28.27 :.28.27 : 06.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 88690 ^ : 123300 : 126500 COMP-STR.-PSI. : 3140 : 4360 : 4470 | H/D CORR FACTOR CORR.STR.-PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M..;USED : FORNEY : . . RIEHLE :_RIEHLE ^- . - REMARKS: _-~__________��______________ ASTM C39, C174, C192, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X ^ _________________________________________________________________-�_�_�-________ DOES NOT COMPLY: . .` .' THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL. OF SITI _______________________________________________________________________________ ' . . RESpECT ED IC N AND TESTING `SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: .. . . ' RENAN R.CRUZ . ' '�. . LAB. 'MANAGER . , .- ASTM C39 BREAKS . A=- `one B= cone and -split C= cone D=shear ^ . ^ . ` E=columnar 4 a • SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A Santa -F'e Springs; CA 90670 562--941--2990 714--526--8441 Fax-562--946--00E6 FIELD DATA ON TEST -SPECIMENS. --- , ASTM C31, .0 13% C 143, C 172, C 173, C231, C 1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: : r MORTAR: SHOTCRE:TE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS:` 81566 ,RANCHO SANTANA DRIVE JOB #: 40116 DATE:, 03/24/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #':- - ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: L ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBEL_L,CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 3120272, 33076-1 / LOT # 7 / FOOTINGS & SLAB ' CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX ' PLANT: COACHELLA• MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT :,V ADMIXTURE:.' ,. TICKET #: 69906 SLUMP : 3. 7`°," . , WATER ADDED: 0 GAL_ AIR .TEMP: 55 F CONCRETE TEMP:'67 V MIXING TIME: 30 MIN - TIME CAST: 7:15 AM 4 DATE CAST: 2/14/2006 RECEI-VED AT LAB: 2/15/2006 ------------ SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK, SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I E A LAB IDENTIFICATION : 6022S9 : 602269 : 602269 AGE DAYS . 7. : , 28' . 28 DATE .TEST : 2/21 /2006 : 3/ 14/2006 : 3/ 14/2006 - : SIZE -IN. : 6, j00X.12' : 6. 00OX12 : 6. 00OX1` AREA--SQ. IN. 58.-27 . 28.27 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 89660 : 128970 . 125210 COMP-STR. -PSI . . 3170 g,4560 . 4430 . ; . H/D CORR FACTOR CORK. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED . . - BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED : FORNEY : FORNEY : FORNEY REMARKS: ` --------------------------- -------------------------•- ASTM C39, C 174, C 19c, C470, CG 17, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL NOT.BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTH EST INSP CTION AND.TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS:- , RENAN . R. LAB. M NAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A'= cone B= cone and split C -cone D=shear E=columiar • SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A �] '7.� Santa Fe Springs, 1 CA 90670 r.O c rn r 5S2-941-2990 ' 714-" 26-844I. Fax- S2-'746-'-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS --- ASTM C31, C 138q C 143: C 172, C 173, C231, C 1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS.: 81080 RANCHO SANTANA DRIVE JOB #% 40116 DATE: 03/20/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT:) ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIF. LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202 33076-1 / LOT # 6 / FOOTINGS & SLAB ------------------------ •CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY M X PLANT: COACHELI__A M I. X #: 94167 TYPE OF -CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69554 SLUMP : 4.5" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 60 F CONCRETE TEMP: 68 F MIXING TIME: 30 MIN TIME CAST: 7:30 AM DATE CAST: 2/8/2006 RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/9/2006 SPECIMENS MADE,BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 601896 : 60187E : 601896 ---------_------------------_--__--------____-___- ------------_-___--_ - ____ _- -- -- - t AGE DAYS . 7 . 28. 28 DATE TEST : 2/15/2006 : 3/8/2006 3/8/2006 SIZE -IN. : 6.000X12 6.00OX12 : 6.00OX12 AREA--SQ.IN. : 28.27 28.87 . 2S.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 90790 : 184310 126890 COMP-STR.-PSI. : 3210 . 4400 . 4490 I ` H/D CORR FACTOR CORK. STR. -PSI y TIME- TESTED BREAK TYPE . . . C.T.M. USED REMARKS: ----------------------------------------------------------- ASTM C39, C 174, C 192 j C470, • C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT,SHALL_ NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED STHL 6 _•�T I NSPF T I ON AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: - RENAN R.` RUZ LAB. MANAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone and split - C= cone D= shea; E=columnar ' SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A / Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670. 562-941-2990 714-526-8441 Fax-562-946�0026 " FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS ' ~ ` . . ^. . ' --- ASTM C- 1, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: _ MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: 'ORES: ' GUNITE: . , ADDRESS: 81594 RANCHO SANTANA DRIVE JOB #: 40116 DATE: 03/20/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: / ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: ^ . CONTRACTOR: LFNNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE -OF CALIF. ---------- _--------------- _____-_____________-_-__________________________________ ^ LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202-29 33076"1 / LOT # ~5 / FOOTINGS & SLAB ___________-______�_------ _----------------------------------------------------- � CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: COACHELLA MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69553 SLUMP' : 5" ' WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 59 F CONCRETE TEMP: 68 F MIXING TIME: 30 MIN TIME CAST: 7:20 AM ' ! ----------------------- DATE CAST: 2/8/2006 -' ' RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/9/2006 ----------------------- -�------------------ _------------------------------------ � SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATION| A '| B | C l D | E _______________---------------------------- i------------------------------ . LAB IDENTIFICATION ':' 601894 601894 : 601894 AGE DAYS . : 7 : 28 : 28 DATE TEST* : 2/f5/2006 : .3/8/1006 : 3/8/2006 SIZE -IN. . ' , i 6.000X120 : 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 : : AREA_SQ.IN. :.28.27 : 28.27 � : 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 84930 : 121800 : 124200 COMP-STR.-PSI. _ : 3000 : 4310 : 4390 \ . H/D CORR FACTOR CORR. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE . C.T.M. USED : FORNEY. : RIEHLE :_RIEHLE , . . . ' __________-______--------------------------------------- REMARKS:' ___________-____-__________-______________________________--_______ ____________ . ' ASTM C39, C174, C192, C470, C617, C42 ' ^ COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: ` THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED~ EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI ______________________________________________________ RESPECTFULLy SUBMITTED ' _ SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERSu NAN R.0 . . '. LAB. MANAGEV^ ^ ASTMC39 BREAKS A= -cone B= cone»'and solit N cone D=she`r E=columnar ' . . SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. ` 10826S. Norwalk #A Sa/ta Fe Sprinqs, CA 90670 ' . 5G2-941-2990` � 714-526-8441 ax-562-946-0026 ` ================================================================================ ' . . . FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS ' --- ASTM C31, C138, C143, C17E; C173, C231, 01064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: ORES: ^ GUNITE: ' ADDRESq: 81606 RANCHO SANTANA DRIVE JOB #: 40116 ^ DATE: 03/16/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL 'UN ' PERMIT #: ISSUED BYP LAQUINTA ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES . ' SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIF. � __________________-___________________-______________________________________ . . . LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202-2; 33076"1 / LOT # 4 / FOOTINGS & SLAB -------------- _------------ _______________------------------- 2--- _______________ CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RD' MX PLANT: CQACHELLA MIX #: 94167 ' ' TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69479 SLUMP : 3" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 55 F N' CONCRETE TEMP: 65 F / ' MIXING TIME: 30 MITIME.CAST: 7:25"AM _ . DATE CAST: 2/6/2006 , RECEIVED AT LAB: 2/7/2006 ------------- _---- ___+-________________-/_______________________________________ . SPECIMENS`MADE BY: 'PHOENIX FEATHERock SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 --------------- _------------- _�____________________________-______-�__-�_�-------- ^ FIELD IDENTIFICATION| A { B | C . | D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 601875 : 601871�5 : 601875 . ` . AGE DAYS : 7 ^ :'28 : 28 DATE TEST : P/13/2006 : 3/6/2006 : 3/6/2006 SIZE -IN. Y 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 AREA-SQ.IN. : 28.27 ^: 28.27 : 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 103760' : 140200 : 143600 ' OMP STR PSI ' 49 0 6 08 ' C - .- . : 3670 : ` : 5 0 | H/D CORR FACTOR CORR.STR.-PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE � C.T.M. USED : FDRNEY : RIEHLE : RIEHLE . . ^ . ____�________-�_______________ REMARKS: _. ' ' ________________------------------------ _______________�__�_____________ . . ASTM C39, C174, C192,� C470, C617, 'C42 ^ COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: ---------------------- n............. _________________________-___ THlS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED,EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE ApROVALOF SITI ________________------------------------- Lt_7__�_______________________________ ` RESPECTSUBMITTED ` S N AND TESTING ^ SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: . -- RENAN R-CpZ ' LAB. MANAGER ' °- . . . Si.. . ASTM .C39 BREAKS An cone . B= cone and split C= cone D=shear Elcolumnar ^ . ^ , SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A + Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 562--941--2990 .714- 526-8441 Fax-562-•946-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS --- , ASTM C:31, C 138, C 143, C 172, C L 73, C231, ' C 1064 -- - CONCRETE: X .GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: 81622 RANCHO'SANTANA DRIVE JOB #: 40116 DATE:.03/17/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN PERMIT #: ISSUED BY: LA QU I NTA ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: l._ENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR:'CAMPBEL_L_ CONCRETE OF CALIF.' LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: T R 31202•-2, 33076- ].. / LOT # 3 / FOOTINGS & .SLAB ' CONCRETE SUELPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT'- COACHELLA MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT : V ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69477 SLUMP : 4. 5" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 55 F CONCRETE TEMP: 64 F MIXING TIME: 60 MIN TIME CAST: 7:10 AM DATE CAST: 2/7/2006 RECEIVED'AT LAB: 2/8/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK SPECIFIED PSI: 4060 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I G I -. D I E LAB IDENTIFICATION : 601874 :•601874 601874 .' AGE DAYS . 7 . 28 . 28 DATE TEST : 2/14/2006 : 3/7/2006 : 3%7/2006- . SIZE -IN. - : 6.000X12 6.00OX12, : 6.00OX12 AREA•-SQ.IN. . 28.27 28.27 : 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 88400 . 125700 : 123400 COMP•-STR. -PSI . 130 ' 4450 4365 - H/I) CORR FACTOR CORR. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED : FORNEY ' : R I EHLE : R I EHLE --------------------------- REMARKS: ASTM C39, C 174, C 195, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY& THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN"FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SI.TI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: ENAN R. CR LAB. MAN,B.Ef2v'•"'`�":^ ASTM C39• BREAKS A= cone B= code and split C== cone D=sheer E=columnar SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A ' Santa Fe Springs,,,CA 90670 . 562-941-2990 714-526-8441 � Fax-562-946-0026 '^ FIELD DATA ON TEST -SPECIMENS ' . ' 'ASTM C31, C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C1064--- ADDRESS: 81635 ^ANCHO SANTANA DRIVE JOB #: 40116' DATE: 03/16/2006 JOB NAME: QUAIL RUN, PERMIT #: ISSUED BY: LA QUINTA `ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: ' CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUB CONTRACTOR: CAMPBELL CONCRETE OF CALIF. ___________________---------- _ LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: TR 31202-2, 33076-1 / LOT # 2 / FOOTING' & SLAB ________-______________________________-____________________________-___________ ` CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY MX PLANT: COACHELLA `MIX #: 94167 TYPE OF CEMENT ;,V ADMIXTURE: TICKET-#: 69397 SLUMP : 5" WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 60 F ' CONCRETE TEMP: 65 F MIXAG TIME: 35'MIN TIME CAST: 7:35'AM ' ^ , . DATE CAST: 2/6/2006 RECEIVEDAT LAB: 2/7/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIi FEATHEROCK ' SPECIFIED PSI: 4000 ^ _______________________________________________________________________________ FIELD IDENTIFICATION| A | 'B | . ' C | D | E _______________________________________________________________________________ LAB IDENTIFICATION : 601873 ' : 601873 : 601873 . . AGE DAYS : 7 ' ' : 28. : 28 : : DATE TEST ' : 2/13/2006 : 3/6/2006 :'3/6/2006 SIZE -IN. ^ : 6.000X12 : 6.000X12 : 6,000X12 AREA-SQ.IN. : 28.27 .: 28.27 : 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-LBS : 91000 : 137100 : 135200 COMP-S|M.-PSI. : 3220 : 4850 :.4780 | H/D CORR FACTOR CORR.STR.-PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED FORNEY : RIEHLE : RIEHLE ' . -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- REMARKS - ___________------------------------------------ ______________________-___________ ASTM C39, C174, C192, C470, C6171 C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: . �~ . ` THIS REPORT'SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI ______________________________________�__-_________________________________---- . ^ ' RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED S ON AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BYOTHERS: .. . . '^ . R.//07ENAN LAB MANAGER . . ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= con6 and split' Cw cone . D=shear , E=columnir ' SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING.INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe Springs, CA 906.70' 562-941-2990- 714-526-8441 Fax-562-946-0056 FIELD DATA ON TEST ., SPECIMENS --- ASTM C31, C13S, C143, C172, C173, C23.1, _C1064 --- CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE-. ADDRESS: 81650 RANCHO SANTANA DRIVE TOP #: 40116 DATE: 03/16/1006 JOB NAME: QUAIL. RUN PERMIT # :. ISSUED BY: LA GNU I NTA . ARCHITECT:' ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: LENNAR HOMES SUP CONTRACTOR: CAMPBEL_L CONCRETE OF CALIF. ----------- LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: T R 31 202- 33076--1 I LOT # 1 / FOOTINGS & SLAP --------------------------------------------- ------------- •-------------- CONCRETE SUPPLIER: DESERT RDY.MX ' PLANT: COAC_HELLA MIX.#: 9416.7 TYPE OF CEMENT : V. ADMIXTURE: TICKET #: 69396 SLUMP : 4'' WATER ADDED: 0 GAL AIR TEMP: 60 F CONCRETE'TEMP: 65 F MIXING TIME: 4.0 MIN TIME CAST: 7:20 AM DATE CAST: 2/6/2006 , RECEIVED AT LAP: 2/7/2006 SPECIMENS MADE BY: PHOENIX FEATHEROCK SPECIFIED PSI:�4000 FIELD IDENTIFICATIONI A I B I C I D I E ----------- 7 ----- --------- ,-- __ , __ _,_--•--------•-------------------•--------•----•----------------•------ LAP IDENTIFICATION : 601872 : 601872 : 601872 ------------------------------ AGE DAYS . 7' , . . 28 28 . DATE TEST :.6/13/2006 : 3/6/2006 : 3/6/0006 SIZE -IN. :-6.000X12 : 6.000X12 : 6.00OX12 , AREA --SO. I N. . 28.27 2S.274 . 28.27 CRUSH LOAD-•LBS . 109100 . 143790 146850 COMP-STR. -PSI. : 3860 5090 : 5195 i H/D CORR FACTOR CORK. STR. -PSI TIME TESTED BREAK TYPE C.T.M. USED : FORNEY :,- R I EHLE : R I EHLE _---'__-__-•----.-__-"._---------_--•--_---_-•-_ k _-.---.__---»-.___--._»-_•- -•-.___----. -. REMARKS: _-------- ---------------------------_--.-.-----_.--.---.--_-- Y--_-.--._.-_.•---'.----.-------.--. ASTM C39, C174, C192, •C470, C617, - 'C4L COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: THIS REPORT SHALL_ NOT BE REPRODUCED, EXCEPT IN -FULL WITHOUT THEAPROVAL OF SITI RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING.:• SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: : RENAN R. C - LAB. MANzf Tft , • ASTM C29 BREAKS A= cone ;B= cone and split C= cone, D=shear E=columnar; Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc. 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA.90670 (562) 941-2990 - (714) 526-8441 • Fax (562) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT SWIT No. '4�1�� Date TYPE OF Reinforced Concrete ❑ Strcictural Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control INSPECTION ❑ Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other REQUIRED ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt Job Address 6 2 N' mmh F'Ge City Ili,(pa0� 1S _ `•dam 7 Job Name /� CJI0 j Permit No. Issued! By Type of Struc ure kArchitect r Material Description (type. grade, source) ourc Engineer Contractor ar Inspector(s) Name �CJC Subcontractor 6 TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES r, INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT- AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. Q per; r , c a i ` 4n Cof 2 slEcoa l e� s` y + 2 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFIC TIONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. r SIGN TURE R STERED INSPECTOR SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE LJ PAGE OF I TIME IN I TIME OUT I REG. HOURS I O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS rAll inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved by Project Superintendent 2e/ WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inc. 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 941-2990 - (714) 526-8441 • Fax (562) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT SWIT Job No. Date TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED A Reinforced Concrete ❑ Str6c"tural Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control U Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt Job Address y� a N dl {� City /a G( Job Name rW / Permit No. I ssued By Type of Struc ure Architect Material Description (type. grade, source) Engineer Contractor Inspector(s) Name r /C Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. O Swid 2 . d `a n y /So Ud� ordered 'jo . r r 444-2, o L 7 yip.aIleadaSyy' j -t/G+VG O / r /i.i/ Jalc -714 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICAT ONS, AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE �& GOVERNING BUI DING LAWS. " C SIGNATUIIIE WREGISTERED INSPECTOR k/Q s'/ =fit 9 - SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ PAGE OF TIME IN I TIME OUT I REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS 40 C All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved by Project Superintendent l WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY •- Southwest Inspection and Testing, Inca 10826 South Norwalk Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 9414990 - (714) 526-8441 - Fax (562) 946-0026 . REGISTERED INSPECTORS'S DAILY REPORT SWIT Job No. Date TYPE OF Reinforced Concrete ❑ Streictural Steel Assembly ❑ Quality Control INSPECTION ❑ Post Tensioned Concrete ❑ Fire Proofing ❑ Other REQUIRED ❑ Reinforced Masonry ❑ Asphalt G Job Address 5� �, .� yJ'j�sy� r^� Cityso Job Nome .te a'Z an'1 0 4n a 44 Permit No. Issued By Type of Structure -5F Architect Moterial Description (type, grade ource) IJ C G y Engineer f Contracto Inspector(s) Name i Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES 7- INSPECTION SUMMARY — LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED, ETC. O i ; 64,4N u CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATION4 AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. /SIGNATURE OF REOTERINSPECTOR `/4r /l0-q9 SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ❑ PAGE OF TIME IN I TIME OUT I REG. HOURS I O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS 04 o 1 /a1 010 6 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved by Project Superintendent WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY