The URL can be used to link to this page

Rancho Santana TR 31202 05-4345 (SFD) Multi-Year Code Update1 ,per APPRuv� Loci -'a• ��D IN 5 �345 �wy P.O. BOX 1504 Buil In 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO Address LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 Mailing Address 7/ C' y Zip Tel. � QUi.��a /c.21 �' 7 7(0 777- �9.Z 3s Glt zip Tel. State Lic. City & Classif. ��i 3 / �� Lic. # i Arch., Engr., Designer ,2Actress Tel. 4 ,44 x --,((0 (% %9 �'r s. `mid City Z'State - �_2 C Z ? Lic. # LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). ❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Profes- sions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or im- provement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). ❑ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) ❑ 1 am exempt under Sec. B. & P.C. for this reason Date Owner WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof. (Sec. 3800, Labor Code.) Policy No. Company ❑ Copy is filed with the city. ❑ Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) valuation or less). I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Owner NOTICE TO APPLICANT. If, after making this Certificate of Exemption you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation Provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code.) Lender's Name Lender's Address This is a building permit when properly filled out, signed and validated, and is subject to expiration if work thereunder is suspended for 180 days. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter the above -mentioned property for inspection purposes. Signature of applicant Date Mailing Address City, State, Zip S 2 #s APPLICATION ONLY BUILDING: TYPE CONST.OCC. GRP. A.P. Number 7 Legal Description 7- Project Description Sq. Ft. No: Size Sto No. Dw. New ❑ Add-9 Alter ❑ Repair ❑ Demolition ❑ l (3C) 2VD oS- 366 s .� 13 DS- 36gO 4 Zg/3 7% Estimated Valuation PERMIT Plan Chk. Dep. Plan Chk. Bal. Const. Mech. Electrical Plumbing S.M.I. Grading Driveway Enc. Infrastructure lIrl C, 1 TOTAL REMARKS AMOUNT V ZONE: BY: Minimum Setback Distances: Front Setback from Center Line Rear Setback from Rear Prop. Line Side Street Setback from Center Line Side Setback from Property Line FINAL DATE INSPECTOR Issued by:_ Validated by: Date Permit WHITE = BUILDING DEPARTMENT Validation: YELLOW = APPLICANT PINK = FINANCE NOKINZIE &LscMc uC. 240804 (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA7 • BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS i Y PL4N1 2130 SQUARE TWEET @ 3 WATTS = 6390WATTS ` 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS REMAINDER OF IST 10,000VATTS X-40% 390 X 40%=• l 56 WATTS ' 1ST 10,000 WATTS+REMAINDER 156 WATTS=•10,156W LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS , 2000 WATTS COOK TOP . 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER $00 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE-' DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 2 AC UNITS 8000 WATTS' 2 FAU UNITS 1000 WATTS FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS • TOTAL 32,356 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=134.81AMPS . USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING & SAFETY DEPT. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION AUG 1 8 2005 DATE,o ! 1A By ar� 7z5- 4 ® _ ram NZ ff Uc. 240804 (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER. DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS ~ PLANz 2600 SQUARE FEET @ 3 WATTS = 7800WATTS 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS , REMAINDER OF 1ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% ` 1800 X 40%- 720 WATTS I ST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 720 WATTS10,720W LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS '2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER' - 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1506 -WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER � 800 WATTS 2 AC UNITS 8000 WATTS 2 FAU UNITS',. 1000 WATTS FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 32,920 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=137.16AMPS ' USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE r A • .j AIIC� NZ uc. (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN) 2863 SQUARE FEET a@ 3 WATTS = 8589WATTS 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS REMAIIgDER OF 1 ST l 0,000 WATTS X 40% 2589 X 4001.e=1035 WATTS 1ST 10,000 WATTS+REMAINDER 1035 WATTS=11,035W LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT 1500 WATTS DISHWASHER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WAS 2-Gki CIRCUITS TO BATHS 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS 2 AC UNITS 8000 WATTS 2 FAU UNITS 1000 WATTS FCrT[7RE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 33,235 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=138AMPS USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE i NZ E oura e uC. � , (760) 360-0728 PROJECT: RANCHO SANTANA ;! .BUILDER: DESERT ELITE SUBJECT: LOAD CALCULATIONS PLAN 4 2913 SQUARE .FEET @ 3 WATTS = 9739 WATTS 2-SMALL KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITS 4000 WATTS REMAINDER OF 1ST 10,000 WATTS X 40% 2739 X 40016=109SWATTS - . IST 10,000 WATTS+ REMAINDER 1095WA1TS = 11,095W LAUNDRY ROOM CIRCUITS 2000 WATTS COOK TOP 500 WATTS MICROWAVE CIRCUIT ' .1500 WATTS DIS14WASBER 800 WATTS REFRIGERATOR 1500 WATTS GARBAGE DISPOSAL 600 WATTS 2-GFI CIRCUITS TO BATES 1500 WATTS GARAGE DOOR OPENER 800 WATTS ' 2 AC UNITS 8000' WATTS 2 PAU UNITS 1000 WATTS . FUTURE LOAD 4000 WATTS TOTAL 33,295 WATTS DIVIDED BY 240 VOLT=138.72AMPS USE 200 AMP MAIN SERVICE CITY OF LA QUINTA... D � � ��.� � •.. _' BUILDING_& SAFEfY DEPT. �: _ AUG 1 20D5 APPROVE® - 'FORCONSTRUCTION ' By DAT !D ! BY !•' ' 04 a 13691"RED HILL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CA 92780 PHONE 714 838-1124 FAX 714 838-1406 Web www.terryengineering.com e-mail, info@terryengineering.com M L, 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS . FOR RANCHO SANDM PLAN 1 TRACT 31202 LA QUINIAA JOB NUvSER 040797 J BUILDING SLMARY - 2. - GLAZING SlP' qRY . 3. CF-1R - O34PL.IANC£ STATENEW 4. HVAC - HVAC SIZING GUMI ATICNS N B U I'L D I N G SUMM A R Y RANCHO SAN 7NA PLANT, 'TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040797 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL � R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 ' NEW ATTIC .CEILING ' R30 DUCT INSULATION R4:2 PERIL- ER INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 10 ' PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALVE PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CJNFIGIRATICN: - PROVIDE D6UBLE PANE CERTIFIED IOW E GLASS PER CF-R FORM TIC=G OUT EQUIPMENT SIZIN3 REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELES.TED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HEATED CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 39395 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLSOWING: FURNACE ' ARE = 80.0016 AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 13.00 i WATER HEATER N EF = 0.60 . 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHIN. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELEC TONS: TERRY ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPCNSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPNENT SELECTION; THEREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTICN MUIS'T BE BASED ON DESICN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO FaMLS 4; 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCOAA ONO. THE FOLIOW N13 SELECTIQNS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EQUIPMENT QTY - MAKE mom BTU/HR FOERNAM 1 (1) BRYANT 311JNV036045 36000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT 311JAV036045 36000.FACH EQUIPMENT 9N mum MODEL TOMS . AIR CCMITIONER 1 (1) BRYANT 539GO36 3.0 AIR CONDITIONER 2 (1) BRYANT 539GO36 3.0 EQUIPMENT QTY MAICE MODE[ GALLONS BLANKET WATER BEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV' 50.00 R-0 6 G L A S S SUMMARY RANcNo Swma PLAN1, TRACT 31202 JOB NUVEER 040797 NU4 ORIFNIPITION WIDTH HEIGH' WINDOW TYPE FRAMING OPFNnG GLAZING SHADING MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1A FRONT 6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VINYL HINGD .DIAL, 1B FRONT 6.00 5.00 RTGUAAR(OPTION FOR_lA) VINYL SLIDER IUUAI 2 FRONT 1.67 7.00 REGULAR . VINYL FIXED DIAL 3 FRONT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER D[AL 4 RIGHr 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 5 RIG -LT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 6 REAR 5:00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL, 7 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 8 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL ST JEER DUAL, 9 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VINYL 1 HILL DUAL, 10 , REAR -. 8.00 5.00 RDGILAR VINYL, FII® DIAL 11 REAR < 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DAL, 12 RIGHT REAR 5.00 8.00 FRIICi GLASS DOOR VINYL HIND ' DUAL, 13 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER, DUAL 14 REAR 6.00 1.50 RIIGILAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 15 LEFT 2.00 6.50 REGULAR VINYL SL mER DUAL, 16 LEFT 2.00 6.50 REM] AR xmrrt. cr.rr co - 17 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER 1 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 - ----------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:.23 'roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone. ... ... 15 _____________ __ _- 'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970. Wth-CTZ15S05 -----_____ Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) _ -------------------.----- Design ---------- Design Margin _ = Space Heating.......... 2.14 -------------------- 2.98 _ -0.84 = = Space Cooling ..... _..... 73.28 66.06 7.22 = = Water Heating.......... 11.14 10.62 0.52 = = North Total 86.56 79.66 6.90 = = Space Heating... .. 2.14 3.35 -1.21 _ = Space Cooling....... 73.28 68.90 4.38 = = Water Heating.......... 11.14 10.62 0.52 = = East Total 86.56 82.87 3.69 = = Space Heating....... 2.14 3.47 -1.33 _ = Space Cooling.......... 73.28 65.16 .8.12 = = Water Heating.......... 11.14 10.62 0.52 _ = South Total 86.56 79.25 7.31 - = Space Heating.......... 2.14 3.16 -1.02 = _. Space Cooling.... .... 73.28 67.81 5.47 = = Water Heating........ 11.14 10.62 0.52 = = West Total 86.56 81.59 4.97 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** ".ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 ------------- --------------------------------------------- project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ------------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 2130 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Fuel Type ................. NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type........... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 21300 cf Slab -On -Grade Area......... 2130 sf Glazing,Percentage......... 20.1 % of floor,area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 Average -Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone - Type - - - - - - - - - (sf.) - - - - - - - (cf) - - - - - - - - Units - - - - - itioned - - - - - - - Type (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 2130 21300 1.00 Yes - - - - - - - SetBack - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- -- ---------- 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- ---------------- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type --- (sf) ---- or ----- R-val ----- R-val Azm Tilt . Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 2130 0.032 30 ----- 0 --- n/a ---- 0 --- Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 412 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3. New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood- 18 0.102 13 0 225 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4-Wall Wood 342 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 226 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 355 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 7 Wall Wood 310.0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard.W 8 Door Other 24 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door 3 Door Other .21 0.500 0 0 0 90 No IV.28 A4 Interior Door ^.ERT-IFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-lR Page 3 project Title.......:... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) ------------ ------ Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 10 S1abEdge 180 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------- IV.26 Al ---------------------- Covered 11 S1abEdge 31 0.560 R-7 No .IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES Exterior Area. U- Act Shade >rientation ----------------- (sf),factor ----- SHGC ----- ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Door Front (N) 48.0 0.370 0.340 --- .0 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Front (N) 11.7 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Front (N) 30.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt5/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back .(S) 25.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR6/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Back (S') 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR7/Vinyl/Fixed 8 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Door Left (E) 24.0'0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL9/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 -Standard GLR10/Vinyl/Fixed 11 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR11/Vinyl/Slider "2 Door Back (SW) 40.0 0.370 0.340 225 90 Standard.GLRR12/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR13/Vinyl/Sli.der 14 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR14/Vinyl/Slider 15 Wind Left (E) -13.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL15/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Left (E) 13.0 0.400 0.340' 90. 90, Standard GLL16/Vinyl/Slider _7 Wind Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL17/Vinyl/Slider_ OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------Overhang------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 1 Door 48.0 6 8 1 2 --------- n/a --------- n/a 2 Window 11.7 1.67 7 1 6.33 n/a n/a 3 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 25..0 5 5 1 1.33 n/a n/a 5 Window 25.0 5 5 1 1.33 n/a n/a 6 Window 25.0 5 5. 1 1.33 n/a n/a 7 Window 40.0 8 5 1 1.33 n/a n/a 8 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 6.33 n/a n/a CERTIFICATE OF.COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 ------------- r1roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA�PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -"FORM CF-1R . User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering -Run-RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 OVERHANGS ---Window---------------Overhang------------- Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 9 Door 24.0 3 8 15.5 1 n/a n/a 10 Window 40.0 8 5 10 1 n/a n/a 11 Window 12.0 8 1.5 10 6 n/a n/a 12 Door 40.0 5 8 10 1 n/a n/a 13 Window 30.0 6 5 1 1.33 n/a n/a 14 Window 9:0 6 1.5 1 6.33 n/a n/a 15 Window 13.0 2 6.5 1 1.33 n/a n/a 16 Window 13.0 2 6.5 1 1.33 n/a n/a ..17 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2130 HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity --------------- ----- ----------------- Furnace 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No System Type Furnace ACSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 39395 n/a HVAC SIZING Sensible Cooling Load (Btu/hr) n/a 35734 Design Cooling ,'Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a 44346 Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a Orientation of.Maximum..... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location... LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design........ 70 F -ERTLFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER,METHOD CF-1R Page 5 ------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date.'..07/07/05.16:42:23 ----------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ----------------------------------------.------------------------=-------------- Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range.. ............. 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace Attic R-4.2 Yes No No ACSplit Attic R-4.2. Yes No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size Insulation 'ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------ ---------------- 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .60 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELINGASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** ,his building incorporates a.HERS,verified Refrigerant Charge test ,r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed;. then HERS verification is not necessary. his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front facing North. his.building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using. *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and- *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** ".ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 ----------------- ----------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ----------------------- MICROPAS7 v7:00 File-S0407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION -------------------- '"his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test it a HERS verified'Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a- ,:ooling system ,is not installed, then HERS verification is not'necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified.EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is :alculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the :arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be redone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS ,erification is not necessary. REMARKS Peak Sensible Cooling Load: 36 MBH ^eak Sensible Heating Load: 39.5 MBH I 7ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 ------------- ?roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date...07/07/05 16:42:23 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts*l and 6 of the .California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility., DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE.INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HWY 111 #F Address. 13.691 Red Hill Ave. LA tQUII TA. CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780. Phone... (76 77-9920 Phone...'(714) 838-1124 License. Signed.. dY Signed.. (date) (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency... Phone... Signed.. (date) k R .VAC SIZING. HVAC Page 1 ---------------------- project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ,roject Address ......... TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James,H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 --------------------- -'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ----------------- ------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry. Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. 2130 sf Volume ..................... 21300 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 0 deg (N) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range...... ....... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used....... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING'LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) . (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 18017 ----------- 105.70 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 7218 10071 Infiltration....... ............ . 8020 4637 Internal Gain .................... n/a 2520 Ducts ............................ 6139 5765 Sensible Load ..................... 39395 33564' Latent Load ....................... n/a 0 ----------- Minimum Total Load 39395 ----------- 33564 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC .equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC'designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. ":VAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 -------------------- rroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ----------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970 Wth-CTZ15S05, Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.................. Volume............ .... .. Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude.. ............... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range........ .... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used:..... Latent Load Fraction....... 2130 sf 21300 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F. 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar......, ----------- 18017 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 7218 Infiltration ...................... 8020 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts............................ 6139 Sensible Load .................... 39395. Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 39395 90 deg (E) Cooling (Btu/hr) 10610 11830 4637 2520 6138 35734 0 35734 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to. factors when selecting the HVAC equipment: the selection as, air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all '1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 ------------------------------------- .Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.:........... .. Volume..... ................ Front Orientation.. ...... Sizing Location............. Latitude .................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Desi.gn....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside -Design....... Summer Range ............. Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction........ 2130 sf 21300 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND.COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....-..: ---------- 18017 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 7218 Infiltration ..................... 8020 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts ............................ 6139 Sensible Load..... ..... .... 39395 Latent Load ...................... n/a-. Minimum Total Load 39395 180 deg (S) Cooling (Btu/hr) 10546 10430 4637 2520 5834 33967 0 33967 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements,• outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC,equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all -_.VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 eroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 Date..07/07/05 16:42:23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407970 Wth-CTZ15S05 .Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 2130 sf Volume... ............ ... 21300 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude..... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range................ 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used....... Yes Latent.Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....... 18017 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 7218 Infiltration ..................... 8020 Internal Gain. ...... .......... n/a Ducts... ..........)..... ..... 6139 Sensible Load........... ....... 39395 Latent Load.......... ............. n/a Minimum Total Load 39395 Cooling (Btu/hr) 10609 11682 4637 2520 6107 35555 0 35555 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures,. coil sizing, availability .of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. 0 BUILDING SUMMARY RANCID SANI'TNA PLANT, TRACT 31202 JOB NCMBFR 040798 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: DNSULAT'ICN: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPSOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERIMETER INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NLMBER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALVE PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS C CNFTGSIRATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E CLASS PER CF-IR FORM THROUGHOUT r/ EQUIPMENT SIZIAG REQULREMER S: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE O�:IRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HFA MC OPACITY TO MEET MINIM[M BUILDING HEAMG IOAD OF 47372 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO HE EQUAL OR CREAM THAN THE FOLLOWIM: FURNACE AFUE = 80.0016 AIR COMI77C8ER SEER - 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE EX=PMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY EN31Iffi2IPG IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE wAPmEur SEIE(`I cN; THEREFORE, THE FINAL SE[ECL'ION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER:. REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE FOLMMG SELECTICONS ARE FOR REFER 4CE ONLY. EQUIPM Nf QTY MAKE MODEL BTU/HR FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE MODEL TONS ; AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) ER)MNf 539GO42 3.5 AIR COMI17ICNER 2 (1) BRYANT 539GO42 3.5 EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE MJDF.T GALLONS BLANKET WATER EEATER (1) AMFRICAN FG62-505OT4NV 50.00 , R-0 a A r GLASS SUMMARY RAND SANDM PLAN2, TRACT 31202. JOB NUMBER 040798 FRAMIIM OPENING GLAZINLG, SHADING NLN ORIENL7ITION WIDIH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRONT 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL, FIXED I UAL 2 FRONT 5.00 5.00 RETJLAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 3 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 RIXZIIAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 4 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 5 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL ' 6 FRCNr 1.17 - 7.00 REGULAR - VINYL FIXED LXAL ' 7 FRONT 1.17 7.00 RD3JIAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 8 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 RD3IIAR VINYL SLIDER DU AIL , 9 RIGHT •6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR' VINYL SLIDER DIAL. 10 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 REG3IIAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL, 11 RIGHT 2.00 6.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL, 12 REAR 8.00 1.50 RECULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 13 REAR 8.00 5.00 RELTII]iR VINYL, FIXED DUAL 14 LEFT REAR 6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VLNYL HINCIFD DIAL, 15 REAR 8.00 1.50 RE3LUAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 16 REAR 8.00 5.00 RE3L)LAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 17 RIGHT 5.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VINYL, HIM DIAL 18 REAR 8.00 1.50 REaffAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 19 REAR 8.00_ 5.00 RE31AR VINYL FIXED DUAL 20 LEFT 3.00 1.50 RIXULAR • VINYL SLSIaFSt DUAL 21 LEFT 3.00 5.00 R937LAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 22 LEFT 3.00 1.50 RE3IIAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 23 IEFP 3.00 5.00 REa AR VINYL FIXED LXAL 24 LEFT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 25 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 _ RD37LAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 27 LEFT 2.00 4.00 R93ULAR VINYL SIam DUAL 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* -------.-------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red,Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ------------------- _'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 ------------------ Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.02 -0.83 = = Space Cooling.......... 71.93 66.94 4.99 = = Water Heating........ 9.88 9.45 0.43 = = North Total 84.00 79.41 4.59 = = Space Heating... ...... 2.19 3.20 -1.01 = _ Space Cooling.......... 71.93 66.05 5.88 = = Water Heating.......... 9.88 9.45 0.43 = = East Total 84.00 78.70 5.30 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.45 -1.26 = = Space Cooling.......... 71.93 66.35, 5.58 = = Water Heating.......... 9.88 9.45 0.43 = = South Total 84.00 79.25 4.75 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.20 -1.01 = = Space Cooling.......... 71.93 64.89 7.04 = = Water Heating.......... 9.88 9.45 0.43 = = West Total 84.00 77.54 6.46 = Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for -Compliance *** _ -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER.METHOD CF-1R Page 2 eroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 -------------------------------------------------------------==----------------- GENERAL INFORMATION -------------------- HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area.... —I 2600 sf, Building Type............... Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Fuel Type ................ NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units..., 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear Floor Construction Type...., Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 26000 cf Slab -On -Grade Area...... 2600 sf Glazing Percentage.:........ 19.9 % of floor area Average'Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35- Average Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height. Area Leakage or Zone Type. (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type (ft) '(sf) Housewrap Residence 2600 26000 1.00 Yes SetBack -- ---------------------- 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact —Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf) or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 2600 0.032 30 0 n/a 0 Yes IV.1 A7 New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 356 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 557 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 265.0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood -572 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 6, Wall Wood 17 0.102 13 '0/ 135 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 7 Wall Wood 230 0.102 13 0. 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W 8,Door• Other 24 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door 9 Door Other 20 0.500 0 0 0 90 No IV.28 A4 Interior Door "ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page -------------------------------------- eroject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 ------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface ------------ (ft) ------ Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 10 S1abEdge 231 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------- IV.26 Al -------------------- Covered 11 S1abEdge 23 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES ---------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade rientation ----------------- (sf-) ----- factor SHGC ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 7.5 0.360 ----- 0.370 --- 0 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------- GLF1/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Wind Front (N) 25.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Right (W) 8..0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt5/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Front (N) 8.2 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF6/Vinyl/Fixed 7 Wind Front (N) 8.2 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF7/Vinyl/Fixed 8 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 11 Wind Right (W) 13.0 0.400 0.340 270' 90 Standard GLRtll/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR12/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR13/Vinyl/Fixed 14 Door Left (SE) 48.0 0.370 0.340 135 90 Standard GLLR14/Wood/Hinged 15 Wind Back. (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR15/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Fixed _7 Door Right (W) 40.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt17/Wood/Hinged 18 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard'GLR18/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Left (E) 4.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL20/Vinyl/Slider 21 Wind Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.370 90 90 Standard GLL21/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Wind Left (E) 4.5 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL22/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Left (E) 15.0 0.360 0.370 90 90 Standard GLL23/Vinyl/Fixed z4 Wind Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL24/Vinyl/Slider 25 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL25/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Left. (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL26/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL27/Vinyl/Slider 'ERTIFICATE OF.COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD' CF-1R Page 4 ,?roject Title.......... ------------------------------------- RANCHO SANTANA'PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 MICROPAS7 v7.00. File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 ------------------------------- Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 OVERHANGS ---Window--- -.--------- --Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height.Depth Height Extension Extension 3 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 ------ n/a --------- n/a 4 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 5 Window 15.'0 3 5 5 1.67 n/a n/a 6 Window 8.2 1.17 7 1 7.33 n/a n/a 7 Window 8.2 1.17' 7 1 7.33 n/a n/a 8 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a 9 Door 48.0 6 8 1 1.67 n/a n/a 10 Window 13.0 ,2 6.5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 11 Window 13.0 2 6.5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 12 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 6.67 n/a n/a 13 Window 40.0 8 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 14 Door 48.0 6 8 12 1 n/a n/a 15 Window 12.D 8 1.5 12 6 n/a n/a 16 Window 40.0 8 5 12 1 n/a n/a 17 Door 40.0 5 8 22 1.67 n/a n/a 18 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 6.67 n/a n/a 19 Window 40.0 8 5 .1 1.67 n/a n/a 20 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.67 n/a n/a 21 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 22 Window 4:5 3 1.5 1 6.67 n/a n/a 23 Window 15.0 3 5 .1 1.67 n/a n/a 24 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a 25 Window 25.0 5 5 1 1.67 n/a 'n/a 26"Window 25.0 5 5 1 1.67 n/a n/a 27 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES -------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab' 2600 ^ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 Project -Title .......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 --------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206. User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------=---- HVAC SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type ------------ Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace ------- 1 ----------- 0.800 AFUE ----- ------------- -------- -------- n/a n/a n/a n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Furnace 47372 --------- n/a n/a. n/a ACSplit n/a 42439 52667 n/a Orientation of Maximum..... Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location............ LA.QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 7.0 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design.:..... 75 F Summer Range...... ........ 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace Attic R-4.2 Yes ------ No --- - ----- No ACSplit Attic R-4.2 Yes No No WATER -HEATING --------------------- SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size Insulation ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value 1 Storage Gas Standard --- ------ 1 -------- .60 ---------------- 50 R- n/a -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 r'roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407980 Wth-CTZ15S05. Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 -----------------------------------------------=------------------------------- .SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ------.----------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test ,r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. _'his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front facing North. 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this.section require field testing and/or *'** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** **.* must'be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** 'i,his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test ^r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is -not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is calculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFMis above the `arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and hen must be .retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be .edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. REMARKS =ak Sensible Cooling Load: 42.5 MBH Peak Sensible Heating Load: 47.5 MBH "'.ERTIFICATE'OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 ---------------------------- Project Title ........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05,16:43:14 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ---------------------------------------"-- -------------------------------------- r . REMARKS COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24,,Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by.the individual with overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR J Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company., Terry Engineering Address. 784cQ1 HWY 111 #F Address. 13691 Red Hill -Ave. LA WINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (76 ) 7 7-9920 Phone... (714) 838-.1124 License. Signed.. �� Signed.. -7 7 2+�_ Vy!(date) (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. VAC SIZING. HVAC Page 1 project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------ Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124, Field Check/ Date limate Zone........... 15 ------------------- ,2ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 ---------------------'---------------------------------------------------------- User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. volume ............. Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude ................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design..,..... Summer Range............ . Interior Shading Used..,.... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 2600 sf 26000 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description (Btu/hr) -------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction and Solar.:.... 21570 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 8629 Infiltration ................... 9790 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts... ....................... 7383- Sensible Load .................... 47372 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 47372 0 deg (N) Cooling (Btu/hr) 12294 13344 5660 3440 7204 41943 0 41943 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of- HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor, design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's.responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also. be consider all "VAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 rroject Title.......... RANCHO.SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 --------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING I. User#-MP0206 User-Terry'Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 2600 sf Volume ............... ..... 26000 cf Front Orientation.......... Front.Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location. ... ....... LA QUINTA Latitude._.... ..... 33.8 degrees - Winter Outside"Design. ... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111.F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range....... ...... 34,F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior .Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction........ 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Btu/hr) 4 - - - - - - - - - - Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 21570 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 8629 Infiltration. ... ................ 9790 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts.... ......................... 7383 Sensible Load .................... 47372 Latent Load ................. .. n/a Minimum Total Load 47372 Cooling (Btu/hr) 11962 12677 5660 3440 6997 40737 0 40737 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. "TVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 --------------------------- Froject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407980 Wth7CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing'Location............ Latitude .................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range............... Interior Shading Used....... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 2600 sf 26000 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING -AND COOLING LOAD,SUMMARY Heating Description (Btu/hr) -------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction.and Solar...... 21570 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 8629. Infiltration ..................... 9790 Internal Gain... ...... n/a Ducts...:. ...........:......... 7383 Sensible Load .................... 47372 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 47372 180 deg (S) Cooling (Btu/hr) 12299 13751 5660 3440 7290 42439 42439 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. . Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all r ,VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4. ?roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 Date..07/07/05 16:43:14 ---------------------- MICROPAS7,v7.00 File-S04079.80 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#'-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN2 --------------------- =--------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area........ ....... Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location... ....... Latitude ................... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside D.esign...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range............... Interior Shading,Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used:..... Latent Load Fraction....... 2600 sf 26000 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F '111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description ------------------------- (Btu/hr) -------- Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 21570 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 86'29 Infiltration ...................... 9790 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts. ......................... 7383 Sensible Load..... ............. 47372 Latent Load... ....:.............. n/a Minimum Total Load 47372 270 deg (W) Cooling (Btu/hr) 11954 13590 5660 3440 7185 41829 . . 0 41829 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all TABLE OF CO'WTENTS FOR RANCHO SWIM PLAN 3 TRACT 31202 . LA QUINNI'A JOB NLMBER 040799 1. - BUILDING SU44ARY i 2 - C IAZING S[M•P1RY 3. CF-1R - CIMPLSANCE SPAIFP1ESlf - 4. HVAC - HVAC SIZING CAILLIIATIONS J BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANTAm PLANS, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040799 , PROPOSED BUILDIIW. ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT FOUL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSUTATLON R4.2 PERIMETER INLSULATICN NONE GLASS FILE NU4M R 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE 7K VALVE . PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS aXWIGURATION: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E GLASS PER CF-1R ECRM nTOJGHXT EQUIPMENT SIZING REQUIREMENTS: NEW wPMENr TO BE SELECTED BY THE O24i x7m TD MEET THE FOLLaAlm REQUIREMENTS: 1. - HFAAT M CAPACITY TO MEET MINIVAN BUILDIbG FlEAT= LOAD OF 51180 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GtFATHR THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE AFUE = 80.0016 AIR 02IDITICNER SEER = 13.00 i PLATER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. HUM HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. ' SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTICBIS: THRRY EN;INEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SECFXTICN; THEREFORE, THE FllML SEL£CTICN MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE ORM: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. THE POLSOWIM SELDCTICNS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EQUIRwERT QTY MAKE NDDEL gN/HR FURNACE 1 (2) BR)OM 311JAV048090 71000 EACH EQUIPMENT MY MAKE NODE[, TONS AIR CCNIDITICNER 1 (2) BRYANT 539GO48 4.0 EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE M3M1 GALICNS BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 1 GLASS SUMMARY RANCFA SANTANA PLAN3, TRACT 31202 JOB NL]MBER 040799 FRAMING OPENING GLAZING SHADING NLM ORIENTXTICN WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 FRONT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL i SLIDER DUAL 2 FRONT 5.00 2.50 RD3IIAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 3 FRONT 5.00 3.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 4 RIGHT 3.00 6.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VINYL HINGED DUAL .. 5 RIGHT 2.00 5.00' REG;TAAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 6 FRONT 3.00 5.60 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 7 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER IXAL 8 FRONT 1.00 7. REGULAR REGUL VINYL VINYL FIXED DUAL, 9 FRONT 1.00 7.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 10 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 11 RIGHT, 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DOTAL 12 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 RFXXILAR VINYL SLUM Dom, 13 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VIM SLIDER DUAL 14 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 15 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED IUAL 16 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLITTER DUAL 17 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 18 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 19 REAR 3.00 5.00 RD3lLAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 20 REAR 3.00 ` 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER' DIAL 21 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, FIXED DUAL 22 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR . VINYL'HIINGECI DUAL 23 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 24 REAR 6.00 5.00 RE3U AR VINYL, FIXED DUAL 25 REAR 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR VLNYL SLIM DUAL _ 26 REAR 6.00 1.50 REOLI R VINYL SLIDER DUAL 27 REAR 6.00 5.00 RE33AR VINYL FIXED DUAL 28 'RIGHT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOUR VINYL HTNGEl) DUAL 29 REAR 3.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIM DUAL 30 REAR 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXMD DUAL ` 31 REAR 3.00 1. 50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 32 REAR 3.00 5.00 RAR EGUL VINYL FIXED DUAL 33 REAR 3.00 1.50 R23XM ' VINYL SLIDER DUAL 34 REAR 3.00 5.00. REMffM VINYL 'FIXED DL]AL 35 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 36 LEFT 3.00 5.00 RDCZIIAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 37 LEFT .2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 38 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLICER DUAL 39 LEFT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR VINYL, SLIDER DUAL 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 Droject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 --------------------------- Date...07/07/05 16:44:11 Iroject Address - -, ... TRACT 31202 ******* ---------- LA QUINTA_ *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date .,Tustin, CA 927-80 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone....:..:... 15 -------------- --- ,2ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407990 Wth-CTZ1'5S05 -------------------------------- Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLANS = MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY ------------ - = Energy -Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin _ = Space Heating.......... 2.19 2.85 -0.66 = _ Space Cooling.......... 71.23 65.37 5.86 = = Water Heating.......... 8.97 8.58 0.39 = = North Total 82.39 76.80 5.59 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.45 -1.26 = - Space Cooling.......... 71.23 65.10 6.13 = = Water Heating..*........ 8.97 8.58 0.39 = = East Total 82.39 77.13 5:26 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.58 -1.39 = = Space Cooling....... 71.23 63.00 8.23 = = Water Heating... . .... 8.97 8.58 0.39 = _ South Total 82.39 75.16 7.23 = Space Heating.......... 2.19 2.87 -0.68 = = Space Cooling........... 71.23 64.17 7.06 = = Water Heating.......... 8.97. 8.58 0.39 = _ West Total 82.39 75'.62 6.77 = Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification.Required for Compliance *** _ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 ------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 'Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLANS ------------------------------------------'------------------------------------- 1 GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 2863 sf Building Type................ Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type ................. NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab-On-Grade'Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade 1 28630 cf 2863 sf 20.3 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F' 0'. 3 5 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type ---- (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 2863 28630 ----------- 1.00 Yes SetBack ----- 2.0 ----------------- Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- 1. Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ingi Act Gains IV Location/ urface --- Type ----- (sf) ---- or ----- R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 2863 0..032 ----- 30 ----- 0 --- n/a ---- 0 --- Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 392 0..102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 464 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes-IV.9-A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 233 0..102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood. 45 0.102 13 0 45 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 618 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 7 Wall Wood 385 0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W 8 Door Other 24 0.500 0 0 0 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page ------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 --------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface ------------ (ft) Factor . R-val Gains Reference Comments 9 SlabEdge ------ 236 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------- IV.26 Al ---------------------- Covered 10 SlabEdge 39 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage .FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade )rientation ------------------- (sf) ----- factor SHGC ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Front (N) 8.0 0.400 ----- 0.340 --- 0 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Front (N) 12.5 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Front (N) 17.5 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Slider 4 Door Right (W) 2.4.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Right (W) 10.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt5/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF6/Vinyl/Slider 7 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt7/Vinyl/Slider 8 Wind Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF8/Vinyl/Fixed 9 Wind Front (N) 7.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF9/Vinyl/Fixed -0 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 11 Wind Right (W) 30.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRtll/Vinyl/Slider .2 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt12/Vinyl/Slider .3 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt13/Vinyl/Slider 14 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400.0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt14/Vinyl/Slider '.5 Wind Right .(W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt15/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Wind Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Slider .7 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Fixed 18 Wind Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR18/Vinyl/Sl'ider 9 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180 9.0 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR20/Vinyl/Slider 21 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Fixed -2 Door Left. (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL22/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Slider 24 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90. Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Fixed ')5 Door Back (S) 48.0 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR25/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind -Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR26/Vinyl/Slider _7 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR27/Vinyl/Fixed 28 Door Right (W) 24.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt28/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR29/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR30/Vinyl/Fixed 31 Wind'Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR31/Vinyl/Slider "2 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR32/Vinyl/Fixed 3 Wind Back (S) 4.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR33/Vinyl/Slider ,ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page.4, --------------------------------- Project Title........:. RANCHO-SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/,07/05 16:44:11' -------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FENESTRATION SURFACES ---------------------- Exterior Area U- Act -Shade Jrientation '(sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments ------------------ ----- ----- ----- --- ------------ ------------------------ 4 Wind Back (S) 15.0 0.360 0.370 180. 90 Standard GLR34/Vinyl/Fixed 5 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR35/Vinyl/Slider 36 Wind Left (E) 15.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL36/Vinyl/Slider ,7 Wind Left (E) 8.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL37/Vinyl/Slider .8 Wind Left. (E) 25.0.0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL38/Vinyl/Slider 39 Wind Left (E) .8.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL39/Vinyl/Slider OVERHANGS ---Window--- ----- ------Overhang------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf). Width Height.Depth Height Extension Extension --------------- 1 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a 5 Window 10.0 2 5, 1 2 n/a n/a 6 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2. n/a n/a 7 Window 15.0 3 5 6:33 2 n/a n/a 8 Window 7.0 1 7 9 1 n/a n/a 9 Window 7.0 1 7 9 1 n/a n/a 10 Window 25.0 5 5 l 1.5 n/a n/a 11 Window 30.0 6 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 12 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 13 Window 15.0 3 5 .1 1.5 n/a n/a 14 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 15, Window. 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 16 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 17 Window 15.0 3 5 1. 1.5 n/a. n/a 18 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 19 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 20 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 21 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 22 Door 24.0 3 8 22.6 1.5 n/a n/a 23 Window 9.0 6 1.5 9 6 n/a n/a 24.Window 30.0 6 5 9 1 n/a n/a .25 Door 48.0 6 8 9 1 n/a n/a 26 Window 9.0 6 1.5 9 6 n/a n/a 27 Window 30.0 6 5 9 1 n/a n/a 28 Door 24.0 3 8 22.6 1.5 n/a n/a 29 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 30 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 31 Window 4.5 3 1.5 .1_ 6.5 n/a n/a 32 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 Project Title Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program ------------------ -FORM CF-1R i ------------------------------------------------------- User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO ------------------------ SANTANA PLAN3 OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 33 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 6.5 n/a n/a 34 Window 15.0 3 5 l 1.5 n/a n/a 35 Window 25.0 5 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 36 Window 15.0 3 5 1 1.5 n/a n/a 37 Window 8.0 2 4 1 .1.5 n/a n/a 38 Window 25.0 5 5. 1 1.5 n/a n/a 39 Window 8.0 2 .4 1 1.5 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2863 HVAC SYSTEMS Number ------------- Verified Verified Veri.fied Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type ----------- Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace ------- 1 ----------------- 0.800 AFUE n/a - - ----------- n/a -------- n/a -------- n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING System Type ------------- Furnace ACSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 51180 n/a Sensible Cooling Load (Btu/hr) , n/a 44411 Design Cooling Capacity. (Btu/hr) n/a 55114 Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a Orientation of Maximum..... Front Facing 270 deg Sizing Location......... . LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design.....: 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F (W) 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6' Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/OS 16:44:11 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summer Range ............... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified - System .Duct ' Duct Duct Surface Buried Type ------------- Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace ----------- Attic ------- R-4.2 ------- Yes -------- No --------- No ACSplit Attic R-4.2 Yes No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size Insulation Wank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value ------------ ------------------------------ -------------- ---------------- 1 Storage Gas 1. Standard 1 . .60 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans,,*** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** -'his building incorporates'a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test or a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. This is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front acing North. This building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must.be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** -his building incorporates.a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ,ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD' CF-1R Page 7 ------------------ rroject-Title........... RANCHO, SANTANA PLANS Date.".07/07/05 16:44:11 ----------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLANS -----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- r HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION -------------------------- ^ooling'system is not installed, then HERS verification is not,necessary. phis building incorporates HERS verified EER. 'his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is !alculated and 'documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the target, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and hen must be retested.'Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be •edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. " REMARKS leak Sensible Cooling Load: 44.5 MBH leak Sensible Heating Load: 51.5 MBH 0 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page*8 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05.16:44:11 ------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF=.1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------- ------------------------- 7----------- COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California. Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by'the individual with overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Address."78401 HWY 111 #F . LA UINTA CA 92253 Phone... (7 0 7 7-9920 License. p Signed.. e ate) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone.... Signed.. (date) . Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry Engineering Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave. Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (714) 838-1124 Signed.. '7 Zoe (date) IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ------------------------------------------- project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 ?roject Address........ TRACT 31202 *******- ------ LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date. Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/Date :limate Zone........... -- .15 - --- �ompliance Method........ MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp' Inc. --------------------- ---- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 . User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLANS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL.INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area...... ......... Volume ......:.............. Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude .................:. Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 2863 sf 28630 cf Front Facing 0 deg (N). LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY ------------------------ Heating Description (Btu/hr) ---- Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 22676 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9748 Infiltration ..................... 10780 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts... 7976 Sensible Load .................... 51180 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 51180 Cooling (Btu/hr) 13047 14020 6233 2520 7429 43249 0 43249 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures., availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc." considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also. be consider all -TVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 k�rojegt Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 ------------------------ ----------------------------------- .MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------- - ----- Floor Area................. 2863 sf Volume ..................... 28630 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 90,deg (E) Sizing Location......... ... LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F- Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior.Shading Used...... Yes' Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... -- - -- 22676 ----- - - - - -- 12779 Glazing Conduction and Solar...:. 9748 14300 Infiltration ..................... 10780 6233 Internal Gain .................... n/a 2520 Ducts ............................ 7976 7431 Sensible Load .................... 51180 43263 Latent Load...... .............. n/a 0 Minimum.Total Load ----------- 51180 ----------- 43263 Note:- The loads shown are.only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design ,temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered._ It is.the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all [VAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 --------------------------- Project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MPO`206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume.. :--:-****"*- Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............. Latitude. ................. Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design......: Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 2863 sf 28630 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description (Btu/hr) -------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 22676 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9748 Infiltration ..................... 10780 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts ............................ 7976 Sensible Load .................... 51180 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 51180 180 deg (S) Cooling (Btu/hr) 13043 14749 6233 2520 7579 44124 0 44124 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is.the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 -------------------------------------------- Project Title........::. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 Date..07/07/05 16:44:11 ------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File7SO407990 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN3 GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 2863 sf Volume..:.................... 2.8630 cf. Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg-(W) Sizing Location.. ........ LA QUINTA Latitude....... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design.....: 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design..:... 111 F Summer -Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction:...... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 22676 12723 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9748 15307 Infiltration ..................... 10780 6233 Internal Gain...... ..... ..... n/a .2520 Ducts.... ... ......... ........ 7976 7628 Sensible Load .................. 51180 44411 Latent Load...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 51180 44411 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of'.equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. RANCHO SANDUa PLAN 4 TRACT 31202 T.A. C$JDM JOB NLNBFR 040794 . 1 • BUIIDING SL?44* Y 2. - GAZING SLI44ARY 3. CF-1R - CIMMIANCE SIATFSBDU B U I L D.I N G SUMMARY RANCHO SANPANA PLAN 4, TRACT 31202 } JOB NUSER 040794 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEIL,= R30 DUCT INSULATICBN R4.2 PERIh = INSLIIATICN NUM h CLASS FILE NU+IDER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TLC VALVE , PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDDU CLASS 024FIGURATICN: PROVIDE DCAIDLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E GLASS PER CF-IR FC M THROuG Xyr • a EQUIPMENP SIZING RDQUIREMERM: NEW EQUIEVENf TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONIRACIDR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIRliN NIS: 1. ' AEATIM CAPACITY TO MEET KDMUd BUILDING HEATING I= OF 51302 BTUM. 2. EFFICIENCIIES TO BE EWUAL OR CR2EATF . HAN THE FOLLOWIIU: FURNACE AFUE = 80.00% AIR CXN)ITIaZ R SEER = 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. WATER Hmlm SIZE TO NGP EOCCEEO THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE DQUIR-04T SELECTIC%S: TERRY EbUINEEtIIG IS NX RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EI)UIRVEW SETELMCN; 'IILREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: REFER TO EURMSS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD allniLATICM. THE FOLIOWIIW. SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE CNLY. i EQUIPMENT QI'Y mum M= EYIU/HR FURN>F10E 1 (2) BRMM ' 311JAV048090 71000 EACH - EQUIPMENT QTY MAI(E MODEL TOMS . AIR 03IDITIC8NER 1 (2) BR)ANT 539GO48 4.0 BQmm m QTY MAKE M= GAIUM BLANKET WATER HEATER (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NN 50.00 R-0 t r GLASS SUMMARY RANCHO SANUM PLAN 4, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040794 FRAMING OPENING GLAZING SLADIM NLM ORIENIATION WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE 1 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLUM DUAL 2 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAAL 3 FRONT 1.50 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DLAL 5 FRONT 2.00 7.00 REGULAR VIM FIXED DUAL 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR WOOD HIIN3M DUAL 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR i . VINYL SLIDER DIAL '- 8 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RE LMAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 9 1 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REAR vim ' SLIDER am 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DLAL 12 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 13 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH CLASS DOOR wom E uum D AAL 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 RDGIIAR VINYL FIXED D[p1L 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL 16 REAR 5.00 5.00 RE13U AR Vim, FIX® a 17 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER D[AL 18 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL, FIXED U-AL 19 REAR 5.00 1.50 REZIIAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL, 20 RICH' 6.00 8.00 SLIDING LASS DOOR VINYL, cgr= Dm 21 REAR 6.00 ' 5.00 REDZAR VINYL FIXED DIAL 22 REAR 6.00' 1.50 REGULAR Vim, SLIDER DIAAL 23 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL F'DCED, DUAL 24 REAR• 6.00 1.50 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DIAL, 25 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER D.ML 27 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR - Von SLIDER MA 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGIIAR VN,Uyi, SL= a 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 30 FROM 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIUQ•D DUAL, 9 r :ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:.RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 ---------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ?roject Address........ TRACT 31202 *******--------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author:.. James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date :limate Zone........... 15 --------------------- Compliance Method ....... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ------------ ----------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 --------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 2.82 -0.63 = = Space Cooling.......... 70.54 64.62 5.92 = = Water Heating.......... 8.82 8.43 0.39 = = North Total 81.55 75.87 5.68 _ = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.21 -1.02 = = Space Cooling........... 70.54 63.47 7.07 = = Water Heating.......... 8.82 8.43 0.39 = = East Total 81.55 75.11 6.44 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.62 -1.43 = = Space Cooling... .... 70.54 62.96 7.58 = = Water Heating.......... 8.82 8.43 0.39 = = South Total 81.55 75.01 6.54 = = Space Heating.......... 2.19 3.03 -0.84 = = Space Cooling.......... 70.54 61.59 8.95 = = Water Heating.. ....... 8.82 8.43 0.39 = = West Total 81.55 73.05' 8.50 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ ***HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** _ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 ---------------------------------------------------- project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ------------------------ ---------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R. User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 -----------------.-------------------------------=------------------------------ GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 2913 sf Building Type.... Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number -of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 29130 cf Slab -On -Grade Area......... 2913 sf Glazing Percentage......... 19.5 °s of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38.Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 Average Ceiling.Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf) (cf) Units ----- itioned. ------- Type (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 2913 29130 1.00, Yes ----------- SetBack ----- ------- 2.0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- --------------- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf) or R-val ----- R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 2913 0.032 30 ----- 0 --- n/a ---- --- 0 Yes --------- IV.1 A7 New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 347 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 585 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 152'0.102 13 0 0 96 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 663 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 495 0.102 .13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 -------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ---------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES ---------------- Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface --------- (ft) ------ Factor -------- R-val Gains Reference Comments 7 S1abEdge 232 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No ---------.---------------------- IV.26'A1 Covered 8 S1abEdge 50 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION --------------------- SURFACES Exterior Area U- Act Shade ,rientation (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 --- 0.340 --- 270 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLRtl/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Front (N) 7.5 0:360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Fixed 4 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90' Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF5/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Door Front (N) 24.0 0:370 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF6/Wood/Hinged 7 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 'Standard GLRt7/Vinyl/Slider_ 8 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 11.Wind -2 Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR11/Vinyl/Fixed Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 9.0 Standard GLR12/Vinyl/Slider 3 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL13/Wood/Hinged 14 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR14/Vinyl/Fixed 15 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR15/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Fixed -7 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Slider 18 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 6.370 180 90 Standard GLR18/Vinyl/Fixed 9 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Slider D Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt20/Vinyl/Slider 21 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Fixed 2 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340,180 90 Standard GLR22/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Fixed z4 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard.GLR24/Vinyl/Slider 25 Wind Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL25/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL26/Vinyl/Slider l Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL27/Vinyl/Slider 28 Wind Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL28/Vinyl/Slider ) Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90' Standard GLL29/Vinyl/Slider ) Wind Front (N) 4.0 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF30/Vinyl/Fixed =TIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL.COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 Project 'Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------Overhang------------ Area Left Right Surface ---- ------ (sf) Width'Height Depth Height Extension Extension 1 - Window ----- 25.0 ----- 5 ------ 5 ----- 1 ------ 2 --------- n/a --------- n/a 2 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3 Window 7.5 1.5 5 1'' 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 25.0 .5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 5 Window. 14.0 2 7 1 2 n/a n/a. 6-Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a 7 Window 8.0 2 4 l 2 n/a n/a 8 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 9 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 10 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 11 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a 12 Window 12.0 8 1.5 -1 2 n/a n/a .13 Door 24.0 3 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a 14 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 15 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 16 Window, 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 17 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 18 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a'* 19_Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a' n/a' 20 Door '48.0 6 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a 21 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 22 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 23 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 24 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 25 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 26 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a t 27 Window 25.0 5 5 1, 2 n/a n/a 28'Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 29 Window 25.0 5 ,5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 4.0 2 2 1 2 -n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 2913 a -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page,5 Project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/0.5 16:39:42 --------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth'-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF=1R User#-MP0.206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 . ----------------------------- SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace -------------- 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1. 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) ' , (Btu/hr) Furnace 51302 n/a n/a n/a ACSplit n/a 46413 57599 n/a Orientation of Maximum..... Front Facing 0 deg (N) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F' Summer Inside,Design......... 75 F Summer Range... .......... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS ------------ Verified Verified Verified System Duct, Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts ------------------------ ------------------------------- Furnace Attic R-4.2 `-Yes No No ACSplit Attic. R-4.2 Yes 'No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS , --------------------- Number Tank External' Heater in Energy Size Insulation 3.nk Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value 1 Storage ---- --- ------------ -- ------ Gas Standard 1 .60 50 ---------- R- n/a -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ------------------ ------------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ------------------------------------ *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant- Charge test it a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. -'his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front facing North. l 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** This building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test ^r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is not installed,.then HERS verification is not necessary.. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is calculated and documented on the CF-4R:�If the measured.CFM is above the `arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and hen must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be i-edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. REMARKS yak Sensible Cooling Load: 46.5 MBH Peak Sensible Heating Load: 51.5 MBH -'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 --------------------------------- Project Title......-..... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ---------------- ---------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 REMARKS f COMPLIANCE STATEMENT -------------------- This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with.Title-24, Parts 1 -and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations 'to. implement them: This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall. design responsibility.' DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... • Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 7 401 HWY,111'#F Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave. LA QUINTA CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (7 ) 7 7-9920 Phone... (714), 838-1124 License. Signed.. �. �,� l Signed.. -(date) date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed:. (date) iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ------------------------------ project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ?roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* ---- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 FieldCheck/ Date :limate Zone...... -- 15------------- lompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. ---------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S.0407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.... ........... 2913 sf Volume ..................... 29130 cf Front Orientation.:........ Front Facing 0 deg (N) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude... .............. 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design ........ 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range... . 34 F Interior ShadingUsed...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- . Heating Description (Btu/hr) Opaque.Conduction and Solar...... --- 22839 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9500 Infiltration ..................... 10968 Internal Gain .................... n/a Ducts............................ Sensible Load 7995 .................... 51302 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 51302 Cooling (Btu/hr) 13628 14571 6342 3900 7972 46413 0 45413 Note: The loads shown are only.one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors.such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all -IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 --------------------------------=------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 --------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ1:5S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering' Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ----------------------=-------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................ Volume.......... ..... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude.. ............... Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range .............. Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 2913 sf• 29130 cf Front Facing 90 deg (E) LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees. 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description ----------------------------=---- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 22839 ----------- 12961 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 9500 13726 Infiltration ..................... 10968 6342 Internal Gain ..................... n/a 3900 Ducts ............................ 7995 7658 Sensible Load .................... 51302 44587 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0. Minimum Total Load 51302 44587 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of, equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. _1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 -------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42 ---------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING_ User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area..... Volume......:........... ... Front Orientation... ..... Sizing Location............ Latitude ..........:......:. Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design.....: Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range........ ..... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used....... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... Description 2913 sf 29130 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY --------------------------------- Opaque, Conduction and Solar...... Glazing Conduction and Solar..... Infiltration ..................... Internal Gain........... ....... Ducts............................ Sensible Load.... ...:............ Latent Load........ .............. Minimum Total Load 180 deg (S) Heating Cooling (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) 22839 9500 10968 n/a 7995 51302 n/a 51302 13568 14558 6342 3900 7957 46326 0 46326 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin,'etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all -iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 ---------------- --------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 Date..07/07/05 16:39:42' MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S'0407940 Wth-CTZ15S05 -------------------------------- Program-HVAC SIZING U8er#-MP0206. User -Terry Engineering ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4 GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area.. ............... 2913 sf Volume ............... ....: 29130 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude .................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design ........ 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 22839 ----------- 12937 Glazing Conduction and Solar...... 9500 14530 Infiltration... ............. ... 10968 6342 Internal Gain.................... n/a 3900 Ducts ............................ 7995 7820 Sensible -Load .................... 51302 45529 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 i Minimum Total'Load 51302 45529 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. r r BUILDING SUMMARY RANCHO SANMIA PLAN 4X, TRACT 31202 JOB NUMBER 040795 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NE N GYPSOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 DUCT INSULATION R4.2 PERIMETER INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NUMBER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALVE N . PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS C 34FIG L RATICN: P%MDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED IOW E GLASS PER CF-1R FORM 7HFMGRYTr E{]UIPM NT SIZING REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONTRACIOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. HFA= CAPACITY TO MEET MINIMUM BUILDING HEATTIlr- LOAD OF 55065 BIUK. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE ARE = 80.00% AIR CONDITIONER SEER = 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. WATER HEATER SIZE IU NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SED4 N. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EQUILMENT SELECTION; THEREFORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DSICN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER: ' REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALLUL.ATLCNNS. THE FOLLOWING. SELECTIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EQUIR4ENT 01Y MAKE MODEL BTU/m FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH FURNACE 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV036110 89000 EACH EQUIR'1ETNT UTY MAKE MODEL. TONS AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) BROW 539GO48 4.0 AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) BRYANT 539GO60 5.0 EQUIR4NT QTY MAKE MODEL GALLONS BIANlWr WATER HEATER. (1) AMERICAN EU62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 GLASS SUMMARY RANCHO SANMA PLAN 4X, TRACT 31202 JOB NLT43E2 040795 NUM ORIENIATICN WIDTH HEIGHT WINDOW TYPE 1 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR - 2 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR 3 FRONT 1.50 5.00 REGULAR 4 RIGHT 5.00 .5.00 REGULAR 5 FRCNT 2.00 7.00 REGULAR 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REGUTAR 8 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 9 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 REGULAR 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR 12 REAR 8.00 1.50 REGULAR 13 LEFT 3.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 14 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR 16 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR' 17 REAR 5.00 1.50- REGULAR 18 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 19 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR 20 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR 21 REAR 6.00 5.00 REIUiAR 22 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 23 REAR 6.00 ' 5.00 REGULAR 24 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 25 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REGULAR 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR l 27 LEFT 5.00, 5.00 REGULAR 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 30 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 31 FRGPIT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 32 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 0 FRAMING OPENING GLAZDN13 SHADING MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL SLIM DIAL VINYL FIXED DUAL, VINYL SLIDER DIAL 6 VINYL FIXED DIAL FADE HINGEDDUAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL, VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL FIXED DUAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIAL i WOOD HIND DIAL VINYL FIXED DIAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL, FIXED DIAL, VINYL, m-mm DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL FIXED DIAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DIAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL SLIDER DAL VINYL SLIDII2 DIAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL _ VINYL Sialm DIAL, VINYL SLIDER DIAL, WOOD HIES DIAL 1 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 --------------------------------------- project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* ---------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author-'. James.H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date' Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ------------------- ,2ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v1.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. -------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = _ Space Heating.......... 2.14 ----- 2.70-0.56 = = Space Cooling.......... .70.07 65.23 .4.84 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = North Total 80.29 75.65 4.64 = = Space Heating.......... 2.14 3.01 -0.87 = = Space Cooling...... .. 70.07 63.32 6.75 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = East Total 80.29 74.05 6.24 = = Space Heating.......... 2.14 3.11 -0.97 = = Space Cooling........... 70.07 63.89 6.18 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = South Total 80.29 74.72 5.57 = = Space Heating.......... 2.14 2.64 -0.50 = = Space Cooling.... .... 70.07 62.90 7.17 = = Water Heating:......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = West Total 80.29 73.26 7.03 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** _ -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date'..07/07/05 16:40:36 ------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 3180 sf Building Type:............. Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number.of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Number of Building,Zones... 1 Conditioned Volume......... 31800 cf Slab -On -Grade Area........ 3180 sf. Glazing Percentage........ 20.2 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC....... 0.35 ..Average.Ceiling Height..... 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond- Thermostat, Height Area Leakage or Zone Type ------------- (sf) ----- (cf). ------- Units ----- itioned ------------------ Type (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 3180 31800 1.00 Yes SetBack ---------------------- 2.0-Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf) or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 3180 0.032 30 0 n/a - 0 --- Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 347 0.102 13 0 180, 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 670 0.102 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall `Wood ,340 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 743 0.102 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 6 Wall Wood 162 0.102 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W 0 -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page ------------------------ Project Title..........; RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 ---------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run-RANCHO'SANTANA PLAN 4X -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface ------------ (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments 7 S1abEdge ------ 272 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------- IV.26 Al ---------------------- Covered 8 SlabEdge 16 0.560 R-7 No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade >rientation (sf) ----- factor SHGC ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments ------------------- 1 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 ----- 0.340 --- 270 ---- 90 -------- Standard ------------------------ GLRtl/Vinyl./Slider 2 Wind Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind.Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.370 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Fixed 4 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 27-0 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.370 0 90. Standard GLF5/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF6/Wood/Hinged 7 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt7/Vinyl/Slider 8 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Fixed -0 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 11 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR11/Vinyl/Fixed .2 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR12/Vinyl/Slider .3 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL13/Wood/Hinged 14 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR14/Vinyl/Fixed 15 Wind Back '(S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR15/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard,GLR16/Vinyl/Fixed .7 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Slider 18 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR18/Vinyl/Fixed 9 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Slider 0 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt20/Vinyl/Slider 21 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Fixed -2 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR22/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Fixed ,&4 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 -Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Slider 95 Wind Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard,GLL25/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind.Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL26/Vinyl/Slider _7 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL27/Vinyl/Slider 28 Wind Left (E) 6.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL28/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Left (E). 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL29/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF30/Vinyl/Slider 31 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF31/Vinyl/Slider '2 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270' 90 Standard GLRt32/Wood/Hinged .ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL -COMPUTER METHOD 'CF-1R Page 4 Project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 MICROPAS7 v7.00- File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth.Height Extension -Extension 1 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 2 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3 Window 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 4 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 5 Window 14.0 2 7 1 2 n/a n/a 6 Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a 7 Window 8.0 2 4 .1 2. n/a n/a 8 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 9 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/:a n/a 10 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a' 11 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a 12 Window. 12.6 8 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 13 Door 24.0 3 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a 14 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 15 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 16 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 17 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 18 Window -25.0 5 5 ' 8.83 2 n/a n/a 19 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 20 Door 48.0 6 8 20.1 '2 n/a n/a 21 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a ` 22 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2-, n/a n/a 23 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 24 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 25 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 26 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 27 Window .25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 28 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 29. Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 31 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 32 Door 48.0 -6 8 1 2 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 3180 -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE:.RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 r'roject Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 MICROPAS7.v7.0.0 File-50407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engine.ering Run RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X HVAC SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace ----------- 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity ` Type, (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Furnace 55065 n/a n/a n/a ACSplit n/a 49353 61247 n/a Orientation. of Maximum..... Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS ------------- Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts -------- --------- Furnace Attic. R-4.2 Yes No No ACSplit Attic R-4.'2 Yes No. No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size Insulation ank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal): R-value ---------------------------- 1 Storage - -- -------------- ---------------- Gas. Standard 1 .60 50 R- n/a 0 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER -METHOD CF-1R Page 6 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 ----------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering .Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans,*** •*** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test >r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is.not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified -Duct Leakage. 'his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front facing North. 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved-HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** -l-his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test -r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is calculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured_ CFM is above the `arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and hen must be -retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be ,edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. REMARKS yak Sensible Cooling Load: 49.5 MBH Peak Sensible Heating Load: 55.5 MBH 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 7 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 r ---------------------------------=--------=------------------------------------ MICROPAS! v7.00. File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15SO5 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REMARKS COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with* overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Company. -DESERT ELITE INC Address. 78401 HWY 111 #F, LA INTA•CA 92253 Phone... (760 V 77-9920 License.l Signed.. VA date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone.... Signed.. (date) Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry Engineering Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave. Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (714) 83.8-1124- Signed... (d te) t [VAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 ---------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 'roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* ------- -------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date .limate Zone........... 15 --------------------- .'ompliance Method....... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp,.Inc. -------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area......... .... 3180 sf Volume ........... .. ...... 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 0 deg (N)- Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ............ ...... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer -Outside Design...... Ill F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range.................34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING -------------------------------- LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description -----------------------.---------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 23765 ----------- 13131 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 10746 16493 Infiltration ..................... 11974 -6923. Internal Gain .................... n/a 3900 Ducts .............:.............. 8582 8388 Sensible Load......... ..... .. 55065 48834 Latent Load...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 55065 48834 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility, to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment.. [VAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X 'Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 ---------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area .................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude...... ............. Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range..... ......... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 3180 sf 31800 cf Front Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 75 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Description ---------------------------------- (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 23765 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 10746 Infiltration ..................... 11974 . Internal Gain :................... n/a Ducts ............................ 8582 Sensible Load...'............ ... 55065 Latent Load... ................. n/a Minimum Total Load 55065 90 deg (E) Cooling (Btu/hr) 12510 15664 6923 3900 8088 47085 0 47085 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be' considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. 'IVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 t1roject'Title.... ...... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..0'7/07/05 16:4'0:36 ---------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run:-RANCHO.SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. 3180 sf Volume .................... 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... Ill F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F InteriorShadingUsed...... Yes' Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang.Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 180 deg (S) HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY ----------------------------=--- Heating Cooling Description. (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... Glazing Conduction and Solar..... Infiltration. .................. Internal Gain.. .................. Ducts .............................. Sensible Load .................... Latent Load ....................... 23765. 13128 10746 16925 11974 6923 n/a 3900 8582 . 8477 55065 49353 n/a 0 ---------- - ----------- Minimum Total Load 55065 49353 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., .considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC.equipment. J the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 -----------------------------=------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X Date..07/07/05 16:40:36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407950 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................ 3180 sf Volume .................. ..... 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location... LA QUINTA Latitude................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used....... Yes Overhang Shading Used....... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND -COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 23765 12488 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 10746 16234 Infiltration ..................... 11974 6923 Internal Gain ..................... n/a 3900 Ducts ............................ 8582 8201 Sensible Load .................... 55065 47746 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0' Minimum Total Load 55065 47746 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability 'of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR RANCHO SANIAIA PLAN 4Y . t TRACT 31202 LA QUINTA JOB NIMSER 040796 1. BUILDING SCM4 M 2. - GLAZING SLI44 RY 3. CF-1R - RELIANCE STATEMENT 4. HVAC - HVAC SIZING CALCULATIONS r t BUILDING SUMMARY RAND SANIANA. PLAN 4Y, TRACT 31202 JOB NLNBER 040796 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW GYPBOARD WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILING R30 . " •.DUCT INSULATION i R4.2 PERIMEM INSULATION NONE GLASS FILE NU4MR 10 PROVIDE LEAK 7F9T PROVIDE TX VALUE PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROPOSED BUILDIIW. GLASS O]NF'IGURATION: • PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED LOW E GLASS PER CF-IR FORM '1H MGHOUT EQUIEDOW SIZING REQUIREM NM: NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE SELECTED BY THE C NIRALIOR TO MEET THE.FULLOWING RBQUIREMERM: 1. BEAT= CAPACITY TO MEET MINI- M BUILDING HFATIM LOAD OF 55112 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FURNACE AFUE = 80.00$ AIR CONDITIONER SEER - 13.00 W ER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. WATER HEATER SIZE 'N NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE EQUIPMENT SELECTIONS: TERRY ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BQUIPMW SELECTION; THEREFORE, THE FTPAL, SELECTION MUST BE BASED CN DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY 'BCE OWNER: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALGURATICNS. TIRE FOLLOWIM SELECTIONS ARE FOR REF'IItESRE ONLY. EQUIRT•NI' QLY MAKE MODEL BIU/HR FHulm r 1 (1) BRYANT 311JAV048090 71000 EACH FURNACE 2 (1)' BRYANT 3110AV036110 89000 EACH EQUIEMESTT QTY MAKE MODE[ TONS AIR CONDITIONER 1 (1) BRYANT 539GO48 4.0 AIR 02MITICINER 2 (1) BRYANT 539GO60 5.0 EQUIPMENT QTY MAKE MODEL GALLONS BLANKET MUM HEATER (1) APMCAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 CLASS SUMMARY RWID SATDM PLAN 4Y, TRALT 31202 JOB N]M2ER 040796 NUM ORIEJATION WIDTH HEIGHT .Wn=W TYPE 1 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RECTRAR 2 RIGHT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR 3 FRONT 1.50 5.00 REGULAR 4 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 RE RM 5 FRONT 2.00 7.00' REGULAR 6 FRONT 3.00 8.00 FREWH GLASS DOOR 7 RIGHT 2.00 4.00 REGULAR 8 RIGHT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 9 RIGHT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 10 RIGHT 3.00 1.50 R23LMM 11 REAR 8.00 5.00 REGULAR 12 REAR 8.00 1.50* REGULAR 13 LEFT 3'.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR 14 REAR ,5.00 5.00 REGUTAR 15 REAR 5.00 1.50 RE3UTAR 16 REAR 5.00 .5.00 REGUTAR 17 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR 18 REAR 5.00 5.00 REGLIAR 19 REAR 5.00 1.50 REGULAR 20 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 SLIDING GLASS DOOR 21 REAR 6.00 5.00 REGULAR' 22 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 23, REAR 6.00 5.00 RDGIIAR 24 REAR 6.00 1.50 REGULAR 25 LEFT 6.00 5.00 REG IM 26 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 27 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 28 LEFT 4.00 1.50 REGULAR 29 LEFT 5.00 5.00 REGULAR 30 LEFT 2.00 1.50 REGULAR 31 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGULAR 32 FRONT 3.00 5.00 REGRAR 33 RIGHT 6.00 8.00 FREN H GLASS DOOR OPENING GLAZING SHADING. TYPE TYPE DEVICE VINYL FIXED OVAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DUAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED am VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DUAL VINYL, SLIDER DUAL VINYL FIXED DUAL, VINYL SLIDER DLML, VINYL SLIDER DIAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIIAL, VINYL SLIDER DLAL VINYL SLIDER IXAL VINYL SLIDER DUAL VINYL SLIDER DIAL, VINYL SHEER D AL WOOD 1L DUAL 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN --------------------------------- 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 Iroject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* ------ 7-------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry' ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 --------------------- �ompliance Method.,..... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 ---------------------------------------- File-S0407960 'Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y = ----------------- MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = = Energy Use ---------------------------- Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) _----------------------- Design -------- -- Design Margin = = Space Heating............ 2.14 ---------- 2.70 ---------- - -0.56 = = Space Cooling......... 70.07 65.33 4.74 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = North Total 80.,29 75.75 4.'54 = = Space Heating.. ...... 2.14 3.00 -0.86 = = Space Cooling.......... 70.07 63.41 6.66 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = East Total 80.29 74.13 6.16 = = Space Heating.......... 2.14 3.11 -0.97 = = Space Cooling.......... 70.07 64.02 6.05 = = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 0.36 = = South Total 80.29 74.85 5.44 = = Space Heating....... 2.14 2.64 -0.50 = = Space Cooling.......... 70.07 62'.95 7.12 =, = Water Heating.......... 8.08 7.72 .0.36 = = West Total 80.29 73.31 6.98 = *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** *** HERS Verification Required'for Compliance *** -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 ------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA_PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 ------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407§60 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 3180 sf Building Type .............. Single Family Detached Construction Type New. Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear. Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area......... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Zone Type ------------- Residence urface 1 RoofRad 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Wall 5 Wall Slab On Grade 1 31800 cf 3180 sf 20.3 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.35 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION --------------------- Floor # of Area Volume Dwell Corid- Thermostat (sf) (cf) Units itioned. Type 3180 31800 1.00 Yes SetBack U- Frame Area fact - Type (sf) or ----- ---- ----- Wood 3180 0.032 Wood 347 0.102 Wood 670 0.102 Wood 340 0.102 Wood 740 0.102 Wood 162 0.102 Vent Vent Verified Height Area Leakage or (f t ) (sf) Housewrap ---------------------- 2 _0 Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES - Sheath- Solar Appendix Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ R-val ----- R-vat ----- Azm --- Tilt Reference Comments 30 0 n/a ---- -0 --- Yes --------- IV.1 A7 -------------- New Attic Ceil .13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 13 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New'Ext Wall 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 13 0 0 90 No IV.9 A3 New Gypboard W -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 ----------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface ------------ (ft.) Factor R-val • Gains Reference Comments 7 S1abEdge ------ 272 -------- 0.730 ------- R-0 ----- No --------- IV.26 Al ------- --------------- Covered 8 S1abEdge 16 0.560 R-7. No IV.26 C7 At Garage FENESTRATION -SURFACES --------------------- Exterior Area U- Act Shade )rientation ----------------- (sf) ----- factor SHGC ----- Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments 1 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 ----- 0.340 --- 270 ---- 90 -------- Standard -----------------------= GLRtl/Vinyl/Slider 2 Wind Right (W) 6.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt2/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Front (N) 7.5 0.360 0.370, 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Fixed 4 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270' 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Slider 5 Wind Front (N) 14.0 0.360 0.310 0 90 Standard GLF5/Vinyl/Fixed 6 Door Front (N) 24.0 0.370 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF6/Wood/Hinged 7 Wind Right (W) 8.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt7/Vinyl/Slider 8 Wind Right (W) 25.0 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt8/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Right (W) 15.0 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt9/Vinyl/Fixed 0 Wind Right (W) 4.5 0.400 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt10/Vinyl/Slider 11 Wind Back (S) 40.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR11/Vinyl/Fixed .2 Wind Back (S) 12.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR12/Vinyl/Slider .3 Door Left (E) 24.0 0.370 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL13/Wood/Hinged 14 Wind Back (S) 25:0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR14/Vinyl/Fixed 15 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR15/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Back (S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR16/Vinyl/Fixed -7 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR17/Vinyl/Slider 18 Wind Back •(S) 25.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR18/Vinyl/Fixed 9 Wind Back (S) 7.5 0.400 0.340 180. 90 Standard GLR19/Vinyl/Slider 0 Door Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard GLRt20/Vinyl/Slider 21 Wind Back (S) 30.0 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR21/Vinyl/Fixed "2 Wind Back (S) 9.0 •30.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR22/Vinyl/Slider 3 Wind Back (S) 0.360 0.370 180 90 Standard GLR23/Vinyl/Fixed z4 Wind Back (S) 9.0 0.400 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR24/Vinyl/Slider 95 Wind Left (E) 30.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL25/Vinyl/Slider 6 Wind Left .(E) 25.0 0.400.0.340.- 90 90 Standard GLL26/Vinyl/Slider _7 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL27/Vinyl/Slider 28 Wind Left (E) 6.0 0.400.0.340 90 90 Standard GLL28/Vinyl/Slider 9 Wind Left (E) 25.0 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL29/Vinyl/Slider 0 Wind Left (E) 3.0 0.400 0.-340 90 90 Standard GLL30/Vinyl/Slider 31 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF31/Vinyl/Slider '2 Wind Front (N) 15.0 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF32/Vinyl/Slider 3 Door'Right (W) 48.0 0.370 0.340 270 90 Standard'GLRt33/Wood/Hinged CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL.COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 Project Title ........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y DAte..07/07/05 16:41:29 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO4b7960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf).Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 1 Window 25..0 5 5. 1 2 �n/a n/a 2 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 3 Window 7.5 1.5 5 1 2 n/a Va 4 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 5 Window 14.0 2 7 1 2 'n/a n/a, 6 Door 24.0 3 8 1 2 n/a n/a 7 Window 8.0 2 4 1 2 n/a n/a 8 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 9 Window 15.0' 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 10 Window 4.5 3 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 11 Window 40.0 8 5 1 2 n/a n/a. 12 Window 12.0 8 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 13 Door 24.0 3 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a 14 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 15 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2' n/a n/a 16 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 17 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 18 Window 25.0 5 5 8.83. 2 n/a n/a 19 Window 7.5 5 1.5 8.83 2 n/a n/a 20 Door. 4'8.0 6 8 20.1 2 n/a n/a 21 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a n/a 22 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 23 Window 30.0 6 5 1 2 n/a '.n/a 24 Window 9.0 6 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 25 Window 30-.0 6 5 1 2 n/a' n/a 26 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 27 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 28 Window 6.0 4 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 29 Window 25.0 5 5 1 2 n/a n/a 30 Window 3.0 2 1.5 1 2 n/a n/a 31 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a 32 Window 15.0 3 5 1 2 n/a n/a. 33 Door 48.0 6 8 1 2 n/a n/a `'.ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN,AY Date..07/07/05 16:41.:29 ---------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SLAB SURFACES V Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 3180 HVAC SYSTEMS Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or,TXV 'Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace 1 0.800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a ------- n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 13.00 SEER 11.2 Yes No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling .System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr)- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Furnace 55112 n/a n/a. n/a ACSplit. n/a 50004 62055 n/a Orientation.of Maximum..... Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design........ 75 F Summer Range... 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS' Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts -- ----------- ------- ------- -------- --------- Furnace Attic R-4.2 Yes No No ACSplit Attic R-4.2 Yes No No :ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0407960 .Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R �. User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------------------------------'------------------------------------- WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy -Size Insulation lank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .60 50 R- n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND.MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test or•a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a !ooling system is not installed, then.HERS verification is not necessary. This building.,incorporates HERS verified EER. 'his building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. This is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front acing North. This building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION ------------------------- *** Items in this section require field testing_.and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** ***'the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test r a HERS verified Thermostatic.Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. .Target leakage is alculated and documented on the'CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the'duct leakage and then must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be done without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS erification is not necessary. -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF--1R Page.7 -------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN.4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 ------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206• User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y- REMARKS Teak Sensible Cooling Load: 50.5 MBH 'eak Sensible Heating Load: 55.5 MBH i COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists,the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER Name.... Company. DESERT ELITE INC Address. 78 1 HWY 111 #F LA INTA CA 92253 Phone... (760 \1771, 9920 License. Signed.. / ' //ti- r (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed. (date DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... James H. Terry Company. Terry Engineering Address. 13691 Red Hill Ave. Tustin, CA 92780 Phone.:. (714) 838-1124 Signed.. d te) [VAC SIZING HVAC Page 1 project Title......-._.. RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ------------------ Date..07/07/05 16:41:25 'roject Address.,...... TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date 'limate Zone........... 15 --------------------- ,2ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 7 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 3180 sf Volume.. ....... ........ 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 0 deg (N) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees' Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range. ............ 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 23751 -------- 13121 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 10798 16610 Infiltration ..................... 11974 6923 Internal Gain .................... n/a 4360 Ducts ............................ 8589 8506. Sensible Load.................... 55112 49519 Latent Load........ ............. n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 55112 49519 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. _1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 ------------------ Project Title........... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 3180 sf Volume .................. . 31800 cf Front Orientation ........... Front Facing 90 deg (E) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70'F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description ------------------------ (Btu/hr) =------- (Btu/hr) 7-------- --- .Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 23751 ----------- 12502 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 10798 15724 Infiltration ..................... 11974 6923 Internal Gain .................... n/a 4360 Ducts ............................ 8589 8194 Sensible Load ..................... 55112 47703 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 55112 47703 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. -iVAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 r'rojec.t Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16:41:29 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 3180 sf Volume.... ... 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude.. .................. 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design ....... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 1.11 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ................ 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used....... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr), Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 23751 ----------- 13118 Glazing_ Conduction and Solar..... 10798 17014 Infiltration ..................... 11974 6923 Internal Gain .................... n/a 4360 Ducts.. ........................ 8589 8589 Sensible Load .................... . 55112 50004 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load_ 55112 50004 , Note.: The loads shown are only one of the criteria' affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing,. availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. i '1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 -------------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y Date..07/07/05 16':41:29 MICROPAS7 v7.0,0 File-SO407960 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA PLAN 4Y ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. 3180 sf Volume .................. 31800 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26.F Winter Inside Design........ 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING --------------------------------- LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... ----------- 23751 ----------- 12481 Glazing Conduction and'Solar..... 1.0798 16294 Infiltration ..................... 11974 6923 Internal Gain .................... n/a 4360 Ducts...... ................... 8589 8308 Sensible Load........... ...... 55112 48365 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 Minimum Total Load 55112 48365 Note: The loads shown ,are only one, of the criteria -affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. r, BUILDING SUMMARY RANCID SANBM CASITA, TRACT 31202 JOB NUIBER 040800 PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE: INSULATION: NEW EXT WALL R13 NEW ATTIC CEILLNG R30 LATCT INSULATION R6.0 PERIMETER INSULATION NONE ' GLASS FILE NUMBER 10 PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROVIDE TX VALUE PROVIDE RADIANT BARRIER PROVIDE DUCT AIR FLAW VERIFICATION PROPOSED BUILDING GLASS CONF'IGURATIOT: PROVIDE DOUBLE PANE CERTIFIED IOW E GLASS PER CF-IR FORM TIFLAIf EQUIRV= SIZING REQUIREMENTS: NEW EQUIRI NT TO BE SELECTED BY THE CONIRACLOR TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMERIS: 1. HEATING CAPACITY TO MEET MINIIMEIN BUILDING HEATING LOAD OF 10580 BTUH. 2. EFFICIENCIES TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE FOLLOWING: FU w1m ARM = 80.00% AIR 02MIT-IO M SEER = 13.00 WATER HEATER EF = 0.60 3. WATER HEATER SIZE TO NOT EXCEED THE SIZE SHOWN. SAMPLE E(;.NIPMENT SELBC IOS: TERRY ENGIbEIRING IS NOT RESPC SIBLE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SELEC ICN; THliREEORE, THE FINAL SELECTION MUST BE BASED ON DESIGN CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE a&M: REFER TO FORMS 4, 5 & 6 FOR LOAD CALLULATICNIS. THE FOLLOWING SELECTIONS ARE ECR REFERENCE ONLY. EQUIPMENT QTY. MAKE NODES BTU/HR FUIlUACE 1 (1) . BR)MNf 311JAV024045 36000 EACH EQUIPMENT MY KUM MODEL TONS AIR CCNDITIONERt 1 (1) IDn%NT 539GO18 1.5 EQUIPMENT QTY NA[<E MODEL GALLONS ' BLANKET WATER Foam (1) AMERICAN FG62-5050T4NV 50.00 R-0 GLASS SUMMARY RANQHD SANTAAA CASITA, TRACT 31202 JOB NLZ43M 040800 FRAMDr. OPENING GLAZING SHADING NLM ORIENTATION WIL71H HEIGHT - WINDOW TYPE MATERIAL TYPE TYPE DEVICE L FRCNT 2.00 5.00 REaKAR VINYL SLIDER DUAL 2 FRLNT 2.00 5.00 RFIULAR VINYL- SLIDER DIAL 3 FRONT 2.00 5.00 RFITLIAR VINYL SLUM DUAL 4 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 RE33LAR VINYL * FIXED DUAL 5 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 REGULAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 6 RIGHT 2.00 2.00 RFIZJLAR VINYL FIXED DUAL 7 REAR 5.00 8.00 FRENCH GLASS DOOR VINYL Hn-X= DUAL 8 LEFT 2.00 4.00 RE3LUM VINYL, SLIDER DUAL i 'ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 Project -Title .......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05-16:45:08 ?roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation.Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13,691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check Date 'limate Zone........... 15 ------------- ------ �'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-.CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = _ (TDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating....... .. 2.42 4.12 -1.70 = _ Space Cooling.......... 121.37 113.66 7.71 = = Water Heating....,...... 43..71 40.30 3.41 = North Total 167.50 158.08 9.42 = = Space Heating ...... _... 2.42 4.10 -1.68 = - Space Cooling.......... 121.37 119.04 2.33 = = Water Heating.......... 43.71 _ 40.30. 3.41 = = East Total 167.50 163.44 4.06 = = Space Heating.......... 2.42 4.23 -1.81 = = Space Cooling........... 121.37 112.03 9.34 = = Water Heating.......... 43.71 40.30 3_41 = = South Total 167.50 156.56 10.94 = = Space Heating.......... 2.42 3.96 -1.54 = = Space Cooling.......... 121.37 117.47 3.90 = = Water Heating.......... 43.71 40.30 3.41 = = West Total 167.50 161.73 5.77 = _ *** Building complies with Computer Performance'*** _ *** HERS Verification Required for Compliance *** _ CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD. CF-1R Page 2 Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R 1 User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA. ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification.......... Required Conditioned Floor Area..... 346 sf Building Type. Single Family Detached Construction Type ......... New Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation. Cardinal - N,E,S,W Number of Dwelling Units... 1 Number of Building Stories. 1 Weather Data Type.......... FullYear Floor Construction Type.... Number of Building Zones... Conditioned Volume......... Slab -On -Grade Area.... .... Glazing Percentage......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC....... Average Ceiling Height..... Slab On Grade 1 3460 cf 346 sf 26 % of floor area 0.38 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.34 10 ft BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Floor # of Vent Vent Verified Area Volume Dwell Cond.- Thermostat Height Area Leakage or Zone Type (sf) (cf) Units itioned Type ------------ (ft) (sf) Housewrap Residence 346 3460 ----------- .1.00 Yes SetBack ----- 2.0 -------- ---------- Standard No OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ urface Type (sf.) or R-val ----- R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 RoofRad Wood 346 0.032 30 ----- 0 --- n/a ---- 0 --- Yes ------- IV.1 A7 New Attic Ceil 2 Wall Wood 190 0.102 13 0 180 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 3 Wall Wood 155 0.102 13, 0 270 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 4 Wall Wood 190 0.102 13 0 0 90 Yes IV.9 A3 New Ext Wall 5 Wall Wood 145 0.102 -13 0 90 90 Yes IV.9.A3 New Ext Wall i.Door Other 13 0.500 0 0 90 90 Yes IV.28 A4 Exterior Door CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 ---------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 MICROPAS7 v7 00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERIMETER LOSSES Appendix Length F2 Insul Solar IV Location/ Surface (ft) Factor R-val Gains Reference Comments ------------ --------------------- -------------- ---------------------- 7 SlabEdge 78 0.730 R-0 No IV.26 Al Covered Area Orientation (sf) 1 Wind Front (N) 10.0 2 Wind Front (N) 10.0 3 Wind Front (N) 10.0 4 Wind Right (W) .4.0 5 Wind Right (W) 4.0 6 Wind Right (W) 4.0 7 Door Back (S) 40.0 8 Wind Left (E) 8.0 FENESTRATION SURFACES ---------------------- Exterior U- Act Shade factor SHGC Azm Tilt Type Location/Comments ----- --- ----- -------- ------------------------ 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF1/Vinyl/Slider 0`.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF2/Vinyl/Slider 0.400 0.340 0 90 Standard GLF3/Vinyl/Slider 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt4/Vinyl/Fixed 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard GLRt5/Vinyl/Fixed 0.360 0.370 270 90 Standard.GLRt6/Vinyl/Fixed 0.370 0.340 180 90 Standard GLR7/Vinyl/Slider 0.400 0.340 90 90 Standard GLL8/Vinyl/Slider OVERHANGS ---Window--- ------------ Overhang ------------ Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width'Height Depth Height Extension Extension 4 Window 4.0 2 ------------- 2 1 1.67 n/a --------- n/a 5 Window 4.0 2 2 1 1.67 n/a n/a 6 Window 4.0 2 2 1 1.67 n/a n/a 7 Door 40.0 5 8 l 1.67 n/a n/a 8 Window 8.0 2 4 1 1.67 n/a n/a SLAB SURFACES ------------- Area Slab Type (sf) Standard Slab 346 -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-lR Page 4 ------------------------------------------------ project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 --------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth7CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-lR User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA HVAC SYSTEMS ------------ Number Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw. Capacity Furnace 1 0.800 AFUE --------- n/a n/a -------- n/a -------- n/a -------- n/a ACSplit 1 14.00 SEER 11.8 Yes Yes No No System Type Furnace ACSplit Total Heating Load (Btu/hr) 10580 n/a HVAC SIZING Sensible Cooling Load (Btu/hr) n/a. 9409 Orientation of Maximum..... Sizing Location............ Winter Outside Design...... Winter Inside Design,...... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range............... Design Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a 11676 . Verified Maximum Cooling Capacity (Btu/hr) n/a n/a Front Facing 270 deg (W) LA QUINTA 26 F 70 F ill F 75 F 34 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type ------------ Location ----------- R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace Attic -------------- R-6 Yes. -------- No --------- No ACSplit Attic R-6 Yes No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number. Tank External Heater in Energy Size, Insulation ink Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value --------------------------- ------ 1 Storage Gas Standard 1 .60 50 R- n/a -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 5 -------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 ------------------------ MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-S0408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF-1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ---------------------------------------------------------=--------------------- SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS ----------------------------------------- *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection. *** 'his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test )r a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a cooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. 'his building incorporates HERS verified EER. This building incorporates HERS verified Adequate Air Flow and [ERS verified duct design and layout. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. 'his is a multiple orientation building. This printout is for the front facing North. 'his building incorporates a Radiant Barrier. HERS REQUIRED VERIFICATION *** Items in this section require field testing and/or *** *** verification by a certified home energy rater under *** *** the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider using *** *** CEC approved testing and/or verification methods and *** *** must be reported on the CF-4R installation certificate. *** -his building incorporates a HERS verified Refrigerant Charge test or a HERS verified Thermostatic Expansion Valve (TXV). If a ooling system is not installed, then HERS verification is not necessary. This building incorporates HERS verified EER. his building incorporates HERS verified Adequate.Air Flow and nERS verified duct design and layout. The air conditioning system must be verified for adequate air flow and the duct design, ayout and calculations must be included in the -submittal. This building incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. Target leakage is alculated and documented on the CF-4R. If the measured CFM is above the arget, then corrective action must be taken to reduce the duct leakage and. then must be retested. Alternatively, the compliance calculations could be -edone without duct testing. If ducts are not installed, then HERS erification is not necessary. -ERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 --------------------------------- i?roject Title........... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 ---------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program -FORM CF=1R User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REMARKS ^eak Sensible Cooling Load: 9.5 MBH leak Sensible Heating Load: 11 MBH COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed' to comply with Title-24,'Parts 1 and 6 of, the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them. This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility. DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name.... Name.... James H. Terry Company. DESERT ELITE INC Company. Terry Engineering Address. 78401 HWY 111 #F Address. 13691.Red Hill Ave. LA INTA .CA 92253 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone... (7.60W71-9920 Phone. -.. (714) 838-1124 License. • Signed.. 1)i ,, Signed.. 7 2,d. (date). (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name.... Title... Agency.. Phone... Signed.. (date) 4 IVAC SIZING HVAC . Page 1 ---------------------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 ?roject Address........ TRACT 31202 ******* --------------------- LA QUINTA *v7.00* Documentation Author... James H. Terry ******* Building Permit # Terry Engineering 13691 Red Hill Ave. Plan Check / Date Tustin, CA_ 92780 (714) 838-1124 Field Check/ Date :limate Zone........... 15 ---------------- - .'ompliance Method...... MICROPAS7 v7.00 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc.. ---------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering' Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION -------------------- Floor Area.... 346 sf Volume ........ ..........:. 3460 cf Front Orientation......'.... Front Facing Sizing Location............ LA QUINTA Latitude ............. ..... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design....... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0. HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY --------------------------- Heating Description (Btu/hr) -------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction and Solar...... 6349 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 1510 Infiltration ..................... 1303 Internal Gain.. n/a Ducts.... .................... 1418 Sensible Load .................... 10580 Latent Load ...................... n/a 0 deg (N) Cooling (Btu/hr) 2800 2061 753 1600 1277 8491 0 ---------------------- Minimum Total Load 10580 8491 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor, design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment; oversizing safety margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC equipment.' u _1VAC SIZING. HVAC Page 2 --------------------------------- Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA-CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA ------------------------------------------------------------- -----------=------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. Volume ..................... Front Orientation.......... Sizing Location............ Latitude................... Winter Outside Design....... Winter Inside Design....... Summer Outside Design...... Summer Inside Design....... Summer Range ............... Interior Shading Used...... Exterior Shading Used...... Overhang Shading Used...... Latent Load Fraction....... 346 sf 3460 cf Front,Facing LA QUINTA 33.8 degrees 26 F 70 F 111 F 15 F 34 F Yes Yes Yes 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY -------------------------------- Heating Description (Btu/hr) -------------------------------------------- Opaque Conduction and Solar..,.... 6349 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 1510 Infiltration ..................... 1303 Internal Gain.... n/a Ducts .......................... 1418 Sensible Load .................... 10580 Latent Load ...................... n/a Minimum Total Load 10580 90 deg . (E) Cooling (Btu/hr) 2821 2745 753 1600 1402 9320 0 9320 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant, design factors.such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. It is the HVAC designer's.responsibility to factors when.selecting the HVAC equipment'. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all _1VAC SIZING HVAC Page 3 ------------------------------------------ Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 ------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- Floor Area ................. 346 sf Volume......... 3460 cf.,, Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 180 deg (S) Sizing Location........ .. LA QUINTA Latitude................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside -Design ....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F `Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar...... - 6349 ----------- 2800 Glazing Conduction and Solar..... 1510 2108 Infiltration ..................... 1303 753 Internal Gain ............. ..... n/a 1600 Ducts ............................ 1418 1285 Sensible Load. ............. ..: 10580 8547 Latent Load........... Minimum Total Load 10580 8547 Note: The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety.margin, etc., must also be considered. It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all factors when selecting the HVAC .equipment. VAC SIZING HVAC Page 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Title.......... RANCHO SANTANA CASITA Date..07/07/05 16:45:08 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MICROPAS7 v7.00 File-SO408000 Wth-CTZ15S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP0206 User -Terry Engineering Run -RANCHO SANTANA CASITA -------------------------------=----------------------------------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area ................. 346 sf Volume........... 3460 cf Front Orientation.......... Front Facing 270 deg (W) Sizing Location ............. LA QUINTA Latitude ................... 33.8 degrees Winter Outside Design...... 26 F Winter Inside Design....... 70 F Summer Outside Design...... 111 F Summer Inside Design....... 75 F Summer Range ............... 34 F Interior Shading Used...... Yes Exterior Shading Used...... Yes Overhang Shading Used...... Yes Latent Load Fraction....... 0 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Heating Cooling Description --------------------------------- (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Opaque Conduction and Solar....... ----------- 6349 ----------- 2804 Glazing Conduction and Solar...... 1510. 2837 Infiltration....... ............ 1303 753 Internal Gain....... .............. n/a 1600. Ducts ............................ 1418 1415 Sensible Load.................... 10580 9409 Latent Load ....................... n/a 0 ----------- Minimum Total Load 10580 ----------- 9409 Note: The loads shown are only,one of the criteria affecting of HVAC equipment. Other relevant design factors such requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc., considered. . It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to factors when selecting the HVAC equipment. the selection as air flow coil sizing, must also be consider all GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED 80 ACRE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMEENT MONROE RANCH SWC MONROE STREET AND AVENUE 52 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA -Prepared By- Sladde.n Engineering 39-725 Garand Lane, Suite G Palm Desert, California 922 11 (760) 772-3593 Sladden Engineering 6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0052 Fax (714) 523-1369 39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895 I'chruary 6,2003 Desert Elite, Inc. 78-401 Highway I 11, Suite G La Quinta, California 922'53 Attention: Mr..lohn Pedalino Subject 'Geotechnicallnvestigatioii Project No. 544-1001 03-02-068 Project: Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development Monroe Ranch — APN 767-200-004 and 005 SWC Monroe Street and Avenue 5'), La Quinta, California Presented herewith is the report of our Geotechnical Investigation at the site of the proposed approximately 80 acre residential subdivision located on the southwest corner of iNIonroe Street and AVCnllc 5-1 in the Cite of La Quinta, California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in foundation design for the proposed single-family residences and the related site improvements. This report presents the results of our field investigation and laboratory testing along with conclusions and recommendations foe foundation design and site preparation. This report completes our original scope of services as understood. We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this project. - If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned Respectfully submitted, SLADDEN ENGINEERING Brett L. Ander n (s' Principal Engineer t' S E R/pc Copies: 6/Desert Elite, Inc. GC:OTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED 80 ACRE RI`SIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT yIONROE RANCH SWC MONROE STREET AND AVENUE 5? LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA I"ehruary 6.2003 TABLE: OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......:............................................................. SCOPE OF WORK ...............:............... PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................... GEOLOGY AND SEISK41CITY.................... ......................... SUBSUR17ACE CONDITIONS .......................:...................... LIQUEFACTION.................................................................... CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................. FounclationDesign............................................................ Settlements .............................. ........................................... LateralDesign .....................:.........................:. RetainingWalls.................................................................. Expansive Soils...............:................ ............................:..... Concrete Slabs -on -Grade ................................................... SolubleSulfates......:.......................................................... Tentative Pavement DeSl411 .................................... Shrinkage and SUbsldence................................................. General Site Grading,........... I. Site Clearing.....................:....................................... '. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas.:...... 3. Placement of Compacted Fill ..................... ............... 4. Preparation of Slab and Pavement Areas ................. 5. Testing and Inspection ............................. ................. GENERAL ....................... .... :............... ......:. ............................. REFERENCES..............................................:............. APPENDIX A - Site Plan and Boring Logs Field Exploration APPENDIX B - Laboratory Testing Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX C - 1997 UBC Seismic Desi'an Criteria n I`ebruary 6. 2003 -I Project No.. 544-3001 03-02-06R INTRODUCTION fills report presents the results of our Geotechnical Investigation performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in the design and construction of the foundations for the proposed residential structures. :The project site is located on the south\Vest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La Quinta, California. The preliminary plans indicate that the proposed project will inclUde sin�'le-family residences alone with various associated site improvements. Associated improvements will include paved, roadways, concrete driveways, walk\yays and patios, underground Utilities, and landscape areas. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to determine certain engineering characteristics of the near surface soils on the site in order to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. Our investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, literature review. engineering analysis and the preparation of this report. Evaluation of hazardous materials or other environmental concerns .was not within the scope of services provided. Our investigation was performed in accordance with contemporary -eotechnical engineering principles and practice. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site is located on the southwest corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 52 in the City of La QUinta, California. It IS our Understanding that the project will ci�nsist of single-family residences. Along With Various associated site improvements. It is our Understanding that the proposed residences will be of relatively lightweight Wood -frame construction and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs on 'grade. The associated improvements swill" include paved roadways, concrete walkways, patios, driveways, landscape areas and various underground utilities. The majority of the subject site is presently vacant and the ground surface is covered with turf. The properties surrounding the site to the south are presently occupied by agricultural fields. Avenue 52 and Monroe Street are paved adjacent to the site and underground ,and overhead utilities exist along the streets. There Are Underground irrigation pipes along the edges of the site and traversing the site. Based upon our previous experience with lightweight residential structures, we expect that isolated column loads will be less than 30 kips and wall loading will be less -.than to 2.0 kips per linear foot. Grading is expected to include minor cuts andtills to match the nearby elevations and to construct slightly elevated building pads to accommodate site drainage. This does not inclUde removal and recompaction of the bearing soils within the building areas. If the anticipated ti�undatioii loading or site grading varies substantially fi'onr that assumed the recommendations .included in this report should be reevaluated. Slrnl(len Engineerim I'chru u v 6, 2003 -�- Project No: 544-3001 03-02-068 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY The project site is located within the central Coachella Valley that is part of the broader Salton 'Trough geomorphic province. "Fhe Salton Trough is a northwest trending depression that extends from the Gulf Of California to the Banning Pass. Structurally the Salton Trough is dominated by several northwest trending faults, most notable of which is the San Andreas system. A relatively thick sequence of sedimentary rocks have been deposited in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough from Miocene to present times. These sediments are predominately terrestrial in nature with some lacustrian and minor marine deposits. The mountains surrounding the Coachella Valley are composed primarily of Precambrian metamorphic and Mesozoic granitic rock. The Coachella Valley is situated in one of the more seismically active areas of California. The San Andreas fault zone is considered capable of generating a maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 8.0 and due to its proximity to the project site the distance of approximately 6..5 kilometers should be considered in design fault for the project. Seismic activity along the nearby faults continues to affect the area and the Coachella Valley is considered one of the more seismically active regions in California. A computer program and pertinent geologic literature were utilized to compile data related to earthquake fault zones in the region and previous seismic activity that may have affected the site. E.Q. Fault Version 3.00 (Blake) provides a compilation of data related to earthquake faults in the region. The program searches available databases and provides both 'distances to causative faults and the corresponding accelerations that may be experienced on the site due to earthquake activity along these faults. 'File attenuation relationship utilized for this project was based upon Joyner & Boore (1987) attenuation curves. The Information generated was utilized in Our liquefaction evaluation The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State but is in in the County's Liquefaction and Ground Shaking Hazard Zone V. Several significant seismic events have occurred within the Coachella Valley during the past 50 years. The events include Desert Hot Springs - 1948 (6.5 Magnitude), Palm Springs 1986 (5.9 Magnitude), Desert Hot Springs - 1992 (6.1 Magnitude), . Landers - 1992 (7.5 Magnitude) and Big Bear - 1992 (6.6 Magnitude). SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils underlying the site consist primarily of silty sands, sandy silts and clayey silts. As is typical for the area, the silty sand and sandy silt layers are interbedded and vary in thickness. Silty sands were the most prominent soils within our exploratory borings but several prominent clayey silt and silty clay layers were also encountered. The sandy silts and silty sands encountered near the existing ground surface appeared somewhat loose but the deeper soils appeared relatively firm. Sampler penetration resistance (as measured by field blowcounts) indicate that density generally increases with depth. Relatively undisturbed samples indicated dry density varying from 79 to 113 pcf. The site soils were dry near the surface but wet below a depth of 5 or 10 feet. Measured moisture content varied from 4 to 42 percent. Lahoratory testing indicates that the surface soils within the upper 5 feet consist primarily of an inconsistent mixture of silty sands and sandy silts. Expansion testing indicates an expansion index of 0 fur the surface silty sands that are classified as "very low'` expansion category soils in accordance with Table 18-1-B of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Sla&len Engineering February C, 2003 -3- Project No: 34 t- 30U 1 0 3-02-06S Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface within boring 1. The presence of groundwater should not impact site grading or construction. LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction occurs with sudden loss of soil strength due to rapid increases in pore pressures within cohesionless soils as a result of repeated cyclic loading during seisnlic events. Several conditions must be present for liquefaction to occur including; the presence of relatively shallow groundwater, generally loose soils conditions, the susceptibility of soils to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics and the generation of significant and repeated seismically induced ground accelerations. Liquefaction affects primarily loose, uniform grained cohesionless sands with low relative densities. In the case of this project site, several of the factors required for liquefaction to occur are present. As previously indicated, groundwater.was encountered at a depth ofapproximately 43 feet below the existing ,round surface on the site. Several relatively uniform grained sand and silty sand layers were encountered within our borings. The site is located near an active fault system. . Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 43 feet below the existing ground surface. Due to the depth to "roundwater, the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is limited. Although several silty sand. layers appear susceptible to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics, the lack of"roundwater within the upper 40 feet should minimize liquefaction potential CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our field investigation and laboratory testing*, it is our opinion that the proposed residential development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in building foundation design and site preparation. Due to the somewhat loose condition of the surface soils and the potential for delineated settlements, remedial grading is recommended for the building areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and recompaction of the primary foundation bearing soils. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site Grading section of this report. Based upon the depth to groundwater, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is negligible. The remedial grading recommended for building areas will result in the construction of a Uniform compacted soil mat beneath all footings. In our opinion, liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the site grading and foundation design recommendations included in this report should not be necessary. "fhe site is located in one of the more seismically active areas in California. Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of' the shucture should be acknowledged. The accelerations that may be experienced on the site (as previously discussed) should be considered in design. The seisnlic prrnisions included in the Uniform Buildin0 Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the n111111111.1m design criteria. Pertinent, 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria is summarized in Appendix C. Shuhlem Etth iueerhig February 6, 2003 -4- Project No._ -544-3001 0 3-0?-068 Cavin�� did uccm- within our boring and the potential for caving should be expected within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSI-IA excavation criteria. On the basis ofour observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the near surface sandy silts and silty sands will be classified by CaIOSI-I,A as 'Type C. Soil conditions should be verified m the field b\ a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The near surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to be non -expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 0 for the surface silty salids that corresponds with the "very low" expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-1-B. The following recommendations present more detailed desk4n criteria that have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation. The recommendations are based upon non -expansive soils criteria. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings that are supported upon properly compacted soils, may be expected to provide adequate support for the proposed structure foundations. Building pad grading should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and firm bearing conditions for the structure foundations. Footings should extend at least 12 inches beneath lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings should be at least 2 feet square and continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Continuous footings may be designed using an allowable bearing value of IS02 pounds per square foot (psf) and isolated pad footings may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 1800 psf. The allowable bearing pressures are applicable to dead and frequently applied live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by 1/3 to resist \vind and seismic loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soils are not allowed to become saturated from the ponding of rainwater or irrigation.. Drainage from the building area should be rapid and complete. The recommendations provided in the precedinya paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings \vill be supported upon properly compacted engineered fill soils. All grading should be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soils�Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be approximately one inch when using the recommended bearing values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 between soil and concrete may be used with consideration to dead load forces only. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings that are poured against properly compacted native or approved non -expansive import soils. Passive earth pressure should be ignored within the upper I foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Shithlen En, ineering February 6, 2003 -5- Project Nil. 544-3001 03-02-065 Retaining Walls: Retaining walls nlay be necessary to accomplish the proposed COIlStrLICt1011. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using an equivalent Fluid weight of 40 pci for level free -draining native backfill conditions. For walls that are to he restrained at the top. the equivalent fluid .weight should be increased to 60 pcf For level free - draining native backfill conditions. 13ackdrains should be provided for the full height of the walls. Expansive Soils: Due to the prominence of *"very low" expansion category soils near the surface, the expansion potential of the foundation bearing soils should not be a controlling factor in foundation or floor slab design. Expansion potential should be reevaluated subsequent to grading. Concrete Slabs -on -Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted non -expansive fill thickness of 24 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor slab is not desired, we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break. Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaining uniform concrete curing. Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures should not be necessary. However, reinforcement will have. a beneficial effect in containing cracking due to concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs-on-cyrade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soils were determined to be 100 parts per million (ppnl), which is generally considered non corrosive with respect to concrete. The use of Type V cement and specialized sulfate resistant concrete mix designs should not be necessary. Tentative Pavement Design: All paving should be underlain by a I1linullurn compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base). This may be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. R-Value testing was not conducted during our investigation but based upon the silty nature of the surface soils, an R-Value of approximately 50 appears appropriate for preliminary pavement design for onsite roadways. The following preliminary pavement section is based upon a design R-Value of 50. . Parking areas and areas limited to auto and light truck traffic (Traffic Index = 5.0) Use 3.0 inches of asphalt on 4.0 inches of Class 2 base material Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard Specifications. January 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations during placement. Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of' site grading when the subgrade soils are in -place. This will IIICIUde sampling and testing of the actual subgrade soils and an analysis based upon the specific traffic information Slndden Engineering February 6, 2003 -6- Project No.. 54 4-3001 03-02-068 Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage could vary from 15 to 20 percent. StIbSiCICI1Ce of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted should be between 0. 1 and 0.3 tenths ol'a foot. This will vary depending upon .(he type of equipment used, the moisture content of' the soil at the time of `grading and the actual degree of conlpacriiin attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses that will occur due to the stripping of the organic material from the site and the removal of'oversize material. General Site Grading: All grading should be. performed in accordance with the ,radin�g ordinance of the City of La Quinta, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory testing and are intended to provide a uniform compacted mat of soil beneath the building slabs and foundations. Site Clearing: Proper site clearing will be very important. Any existing vegetation, slabs, foundations, abandoned underground utilities or irrigation lines should be removed from the proposed building areas and the resulting excavations should be properly backtilled. Soils that are disturbed during site clearing Shollld be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill. under the direction of the Soils Engineer. 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: In order to provide adequate and uniform bearing conditions; we recommend overexcavation throughout the proposed building areas. The building'areas should be overexcavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below existing grade or 2 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. The exposed soils should then be scarified to a depth of I foot. moisture conditioned and reconlpacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The excavated material may then be replaced as engineered till material as recommended below. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Within the building pad areas, till materials should be spread in thin lifts, and compacted at near optinlunl moisture content to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported fill material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor shall notify the Soils Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of importing soils in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of' proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site that complies with the project specifications. Approval by the Soils Engineer will be based upon malerial delivered to the site and not the preliminary evaluation of import sources. Our observatiolls of the materials encountered during our investigation indicate that compaction within the native soils will be most readily obtained by means of heavy - Rib , ber tired equipment and/or sheepsfoot compactors. A uniform and near optinlunl moisture content should be maintained di-11,fill placement'and compactionl. 4. Preparation of Slab and Paving Areas: .All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving or exterior concrete slabs -on -grade, Should be underlain by a Illllltllltllll compacted fill thickness of 12 inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation. scarification and recompact Ioil of the surface, and replacement of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. Compaction of the slab and pavement areas should be to a mininutlll of 90 percent relative compaction. •,Vueldell Eaglneerlll February 6.2003 -7- Project No. S l 1-3001 - 03-02-068 5. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations should be performed by the Soils Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being performed in accordance \vith the project specifications. Field .density testing shall be performed in accordance with. applicable ASTM test standards. The minimum acceptable de�,,ree of compaction shall be 90 percent of the maximum dry density as obtained by the ASTM D1557-91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactioe effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. GENERAL I'he findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building area. Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this . repoi-t, this office should be notified. This report is considered to be applicable for use by Desert Elite, Inc., Inc. for the specific site and project described herein. The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report are contincrent upon monitoring of the grading operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our revie�� of the grading operations and additional testing, if indicated. if others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testis`-, in order to coordinate any required site visits by our representative and to assure indemirification of Sladden Engineering. We recommend that a pre ,job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The purpose of this meeting will be to assure a complete understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. Shuhlen Enghteerhig I'ebruary 6. 2003 -8- Project No. 544-3001 U3-U?-068 REFERENCES ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, April 1974. 1300re, Joyner and Fumal (1994) IistiMltinrl of Response ,Sj)ec•tru cruel Peuk Acce1e1wtions fi•onl Acolvh .4111el'icu7 E111-thquuke.s-, U. S. Geological Survey, Open File Reports 94-127 and 93-509. Finn, W. E. Liam, (1996) Evuluution of Liyetejuctiun Potential fur Uilfel•ent Eurthc/truke iblagllilricle.c uncl Site C'orlditinrls, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Committee. Joyner and Boore, (1988) Measureluenls•, Churucterizotion urld Prediction of Strong GroU1761 tI%ntloll, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Special I'ublication No. 20. Lee & Albaisa (1974) "Ectrthquuke hldt,ced Settletllent.s ill .Saturated Surds" Seed and Idriss ( 1982) Ground 11110tions and Soil Liquc�fuction During Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research institute Monograph. Seed, Tok1111atSU, Harder and Chung, (1985), h fhtence ofSPT Prncerhues in Snit Liquefcicliolr Re.ristunce Evaluations, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume I 11, No. 12, December. Rogers, Thomas I -I., Geologic Map of California, Santa Ana Map Sheet. Riverside County, 1984, Seismic Salehy Elelnerlt of t/le Rivers icle C'olmh General Plon Slcrciclen Engineerim APPENDIX A Site Plan Boring Logs > 4 • . I 1 ' 1 APPENDIX :k FIELD EXPLORATION For our held investi,ption, 10 exploratory borings were excavated on January 3 and 10, 2003, using, a truck mounted hollow stein auger rid (Mobile B-61) in the approximate locations indicated on the site. plan included in this appendix. Continuous logy,, of the materials encountered were prepared on the site hy, a representative ol-Sladden Engineerin burin" lo`,s are included in this appendix. Representative undisturbed samples were obtained within our boring by driving a thin -walled steel penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) or a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler with a 140 pound hammer dropping approximately 30 inches (ASTM DI 586 1 ). The number of blows required to drive the samplers 18 inches was recorded (generally in 6 inch increments). Blowcounts are indicated 6n the boring log. The California samplers are 3.0 inches in diameter, carrying, brass sample rings having inner diameters of 2.5 inches. The standard penetration samplers are 2.0 inches in diameter with an inner diameter of 1.5 inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in order to preserve the natural soil moisture content. Bulk samples were obtained fronr the excavation spoils and samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing. N L CV �,. • Avenue 52 .. I `SITE:: r �r G i G 1 ' Figure 1 - Vicinit Monroe Ran( Proposed 80-acre Resident] North SWC Monroe Street & Indio Area Riverside County, C No Scale Sladden Engine( Project Number: 544-3001 • Y J 'O i p • Figure 2 - Boring Location Map Monroe Ranch Proposed 80-acre Residential Development SWC Monroe Street & Avenue 52 North Approximate Boring Locations Indio Area ----� Riverside County, California No Scale Y Sladden Engineering ` Project Number: 544-3001 Date: 2-10-03 Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street &Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1.-3-03 oringr No. 1 Job No.: 5,14-3001 DESCRIPTION A 4� > .o 4, U REA/L,�RKS �w r ,z, [/) (:D U) 11-3 o �-z Q u Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 3/3/6 90 26 72% passing H200 5 2/3/5 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 93 25 --- 58% passing #200 with interbedded sandy silt layers 5/9/13 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 101 4 --- 7%, passing 9200 15 1/1/1 Silty Clay: Brown CL --- 39 --• 91%passing #200 20K 4/5/5 Clayey Silt: Brown, ML --- 33 0 87 /° passing #200 slightly sandy s 25 3/9/9 Sandy Silt: Brown, ML ... 29 --- 64% passing #200 slightly clayey 30 3/4/5 " " ... 25 ... 62% passing #200 35 6/9/12 Silty Sand: Brown, SM _-- 7 16% passing #200 Fine grained ,t o 5/10/16 14 •-- l 7% passing #200 Groundwater (a)43' 8/10/16 Sand: Brown, SP/SM --- 18 ••. 12%passing #200 slightly silty, tine grained 50 Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM v12/16 witli interbedded clayey silt layers 24 41 % passing #200 - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 51.5' - Note: The stratification lines No Bedrock 55 Standard Penetration represent the approximate Sample boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005`/ S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-3-03 orinLY No. 2 Job No.: 544-3001 i 5 �4 a� o o DESCRIPTION ; Q 41 M � REMARKS . U rn J � I U Silty Sand: Brown, SM 3/5/5 fine grained 97 8 Y 5/7/10 104 6 --- 10 . 6/11/12 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 104 4 ... 6/9/13 Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM 102 12 with interbedded clayey silt layers - (� _ 2/3/4 Silt Clay: Brown Y Y� 5 CL SS 35 •-- ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock No Groundwater 30 s5 -iu ..I 5 50 Note: The stratificltion line; .,5 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Boring No. 3 Job No.: 544-3001. y > 0 X (U o Cn DESCRIPTION Q RElVL4RKS 3 i~ o Q" M 0 cq c) a C�0 o Silty Sand: Brown, SM fine grained 5 2/4/6 Silty Sand: Brown, SM, 98 22 very silty, fine grained 10, _ 5/lU/15 Sand: Brown SP/SM 9J - slightly silty, fine grained 15 _/`3/7 Clayey Silt: Brown, ML 87 30 with thin interbedded sand layers 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/5/5 very silty, fine grained 91 9 --- - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater 30 35 • 10' 45 50 Note: The stratification lines z,5 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 oriner No. 4 Job No.: 544-3001 o DESCRIPTION °�, q >., M W REMARKSa IVI o , a. xo , 0 m o U) aU o Silty Sand: Brown, SM fine grained , 3/2/3 Clayey Silt: Brown,`sandy ML 95 28 to 1/1/3 Silty Clay: Brown with thin CL 87 36 --- interbedded silty sand layers 15 3/5/7 Silty Sand: Brown, SM . _ very silty, fine grained'97 l 20 2/4/6 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy ML 89 • 31 --- ® Recovered Sample Total" Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater :3 0 . :35 + 45 Sn 1 Note: The stratification lines 53 ' represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California .Date: 1-10-03 Borin No. 5 Job No.: 544-3001 (U 5 z s~ > o o DESCRIPTION ° Q z � REMARKS �w o Q a Cl)U CQ U1 a jQ U o- , Sand: Brown, SP/SM 4/6/5 slightly silty, fine grained 100 G 9% passing #200 2/3/4 Silty Clay: Brown CL 91 32 --- 99% passing #200 to 6111/13 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 97 5 -__ 7%° passing #200 with thin clay layers 15 6/7/10 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 5 7%passing #200 20 _ 4/s/S Silty Sand: Brown, SM g ° ZO /o passing #200 - fine grained •>,5 5/9/12 Sand: Brown, SP/SM _ G --- 9% passing #200 slightly silty, fine grained 30 6/10/13 Silty Sand: Brown, fine grained SM ___ 14 -- 39% passing #200 with interbedded clayey silt layers 3" 7/12/17 Sand: Brown, SP/SM 5 -- 11 %passing #200 slightly silty, fine grained 40 6/9/9 Silt Sand: Brown, fine y grained Slvt --- 17 --- 34%passing #200 with interbedded clayey silt layers 1/3/5 Clayey Silt: Brown ML 35 89% passing #200 so 8113/lfi Silty Sand: Brown, very silty,fine grained SM 13 32% passing #200 - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 51.•5' - Note: The stratification lines No Bedrock "" � Standard Penetration represent the. approximate No Groundwater Sample boundaries between the soil types; p the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 % Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Borin--No. 6 Job No.: 511-300.1 c, aU o �'DESCRIPTION ' � Cz m REMARKS `G a � '2 a)3 c O Q~ :;, O .O .. o to J W to n o U o Sand: Brown, SP/SM ' _ slightly silty, fine grained t 4/7/11 # ^ 103 G 3/6/11 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 94 7 ` 15 " G/9/8 Sand: Brown, SP/SM 95 8 - slightly silty, fine grained , 20 4/11/14 105 G ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' - No Bedrock 25 • No Groundwater 30 , aS '10 f _ 4 50 " Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: - the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California' - Date: 1-10-03 BoringNo. 8 Job No.: 544-3001 Q > o y `° DESCRIPTION (U `� Q �' REMARKS o o x . Qv U) C-), CQ ' 0 v) .' u o U o Silty Sand: Brown, SM • very silty, fine grained , 5 4/4/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL 88 34 10 _ 5/10/15 Sand: Brown, fine grained SP 104 5 � 2/5/6 Silty Clay: Brown CL 82 38 ••_ 20 Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/9/9 fine grained 10'2 7 ••- ® Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock 25 . No Groundwater 30 35 <I 0 r 45 50 Note: Tlie stratification lines, 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 orinLy No. 91 Job No.: 544-3001 a� a o �CO° DESCRIPTION q . o a REMARKS 41 o 1' 3 o (� " c! U W o rn �D 3 0 o U o Silty Sand: Brown, ` SM very silty, fine grained 5 2/2/7 96 21 --- 10 2/2/3 Silty Clay: Brown 4 CL 79 42 2/3/3 81 41 20 _ 2/6/6 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey + ML 87 25 ` - Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21..5' No Bedrock 25 } No Groundwater 30 j a 35 — 40 45 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions. inay he gradual. Proposed 80 Acre Residential Development A.P.N. 767-200-004 & -005 / S.W.C. Monroe Street & Avenue 52 / Indio, California Date: 1-10-03 Boriniz, No. 10 Job No.: 544-3001 . X W 0 DESCRIPTION ° Q M REMARKS o H �� 0. c Q .... C/) U O U U �D -1� o O o U �I Silty Sand: Brown, SM tine grained Palm tree roots encountered from 2 to 3' 5 _ 3/3/7 Clayey Silt: Brown, sandy, ML 92 28 --- trace roots 10 3/3/8 Silty Clay: Brown CL 91 32 with thin sand layers 3/4/8 Sandy Silt: Brown, clayey ML 113 25 M with interbedded sandy silt layers •gin Silty Sand: Brown, SM 4/8/13 fine grained 96 7 --- Recovered Sample Total Depth = 21.5' ' No Bedrock 25 No Groundwater 30 35 10 a ,15 50 Note: The stratification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; , the transitions may be gradual. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field and returned to our laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing was generally performed in two phases. T'he first phase consisted of testing in order to determine the compaction of the existing natural soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics of the soil and to serve as a basis for selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing. This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order- to provide a means of developing specific design recommendations based on the mechanical properties of the soil. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of the soil in its natural condition. The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Log. Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-91, Test Method A. The results of this testing are presented graphically in this appendix. The maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing relative compaction to the soil. This is shown on the Boring Log, and is useful in estimating the strength and compressibility of the soil. Classification Testing: Soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of mechanical grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits determinations. These provide information for developing classitcations for the soil in accordance with the Unified Classification System. This classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The results of this testing are very useful in detecting variations in the soils and in selecting samples for further testing. SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING Direct Shear Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Direct Shear Testing. This testing measures the Shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used in developing parameters for foundation design and lateral design. Testing was performed using recompacted test specimens, which were saturated prior to testing. Testing was performed using a strain controlled test apparatus with normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot. Expansion Testing: One bulk sample was selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. This testis; consists of remolding 4-111ch diameter by I -inch thick test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50' percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear expansion is then measured until complete. Consolidation Testing: Four relatively undisturbed samples were selected for consolidation testing. For this testing one -inch thick test specimens are subjected to vertical loads varying, from 575 psf to 11520 psf applied progressively. The consolidation at each load increment was recorded prior to placement of each subsequent load. The specimens were saturated at the 575 psf or 720 psf load increment. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture ASTM D698/D 1557 Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Lab ID Number: Sample Location: B 1 @ 0-5' Description: Silghtly Silty Sand Maximum Density: 110 pef Optimum Moisture 13.5% I, 13 13 w V n 11 is C V A 12( A L Q 115 110 105 100 Sieve Size % Retained 3/4" 3/8" #4 0.0 I 15 Moisture Content, % 20 January 17, 2003 ASTM D-1557 A Rammer Type: Machine 25 Max Density Sladden Engineering Revised 12/03/02 Direct Shear ASTM D 3080-90 (modified for unconsolidated, undrained conditions) x Job Number. 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Job Name Monroe'& Ave 52 Initial Dry Density: 96.8 pcf Lab ID Numbe Initial Mosture Content: •14.0 % Sample ID Boring 1 @ 0=5' Peak Friction Angle (0): 27°' Soil Descriptio Silty Sand Cohesion (c): 60 psf Sample Type Remolded @ 90% of Maximum Density ' Test Results 1 2 3 4 Average Moisture Content, % 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 20.1 Saturation, % 73.2 73.2 73..2 73.2 73.2 Normal Stress, kips 0.151 ' 0.301 0.603 1.206 Peak Stress, kips 0.153 0.207 0.342 0.675 ' —• Peak Stress Linear (PeakStress) l.2 l .0 0.8 ai L' 0.6 R 0.4 0.2 00 I i I , 0.0 0.2 w 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.6 1.2 1.4 Normal Stress . '! r Direct Shear Sladden Engineering Revised 12/03/02 Gradation ASTMC117&C136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 200" Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: Boring 1 @ 0-5 ' '.• . Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size, mm Passing 1" 25.4 .., 100 3/4" 19,1 .100 1 /2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4 75 100 . #8 2.36 100 #16 1.18. 100 . #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30• 95 # 100 0.15 - 66 #200 .0.674 37 100 90 80 70 60 .N Cn 50 40 30 20 10 0 i ------iuno o� ri i IlM ■Mi{iiuEn�i lull ima■.-liim !�� mon no RON 100.0 10.0 1.0 " 0.1 6.0 0.0 Sieve3ize, mm y Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised i iizoioz Gradation ` ASTM C 1 17 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 3@10 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in Size,, mm Passing 25.4 100 3/4" 19.1 100 . 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.15 100 #8 2.36 100 . #16 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 .#50 0.30 94 #100 0.15 31 #200 0.074 7 e 100 80- 70 I on .60 i — 1 Cn 50��— a..- 40 i i 7 i I• I 30 20 FT 100.0 10.0 .1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised i uzoioz Gradation ASTM C 117 & C 136 Project Number: 544-3001 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 5@15 . Sieve. Sieve Percent Size, in - Size, mm Passing 1" 25.4 100 3/4" 19.1 100 1/2" 12.7 100 3/8'' 9.53 100 #4 4.75. 100. ' #8 2.36 100 #16 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 #50 0.30 73 #100 0.15 27 #200 0.074 7 . e January 17, 2003 100 90 H4111 Ilii I 80 _ 1 i 70 Dil an 60 � I I . M 50LL 40 3 o 20 I i 10!I�_ p i — 100.0 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 Gradation ASTM Cl 17-& C136 Project Number: 544-3001 January 17, 2003 Project Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 8@10 Sieve Sieve Percent Size, in ` Size, mm Passing I " 25.4 100 3/4" ' 19.1 , 100 " 1 /2" 12.7 100 3/8" 9.53 100 #4 4.75 100* #8 2.36 100 416 1.18 100 #30 0.60 100 , #50 `. 6.30 94 9100 0.15 39 #200 0.074 6 100 90 - 80 70 IoM Ii 60 II a 50 1iI1lIl 40 NN E0E 30 20 OMOiWINNMNEn0No EE 10 w 0 100.0 10.0 1.0 . 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sieve Size, mm - �vu I'E-' 0 n u ■■Muniiii ■ten �ini� imu�uin IN Gradation Sladden Engineering Revised I I/20/G2 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 1@2 Soil Description: Silty Sand -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 - 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf. 84.2 Initial Moisture, %: 26 Initial Void Ratio: 0.980 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram --9 - Before Saturation A After Saturation I — 9 Rebound Hydro Consolidation I _om i 6.0 7.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 1 v2oio2- 0 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample 1D-. 1@5 Soil Description: Silty Sand i -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 0.0 1.0 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density; pcf: 91.6 Initial Moisture, % : 25 Initial Void Ratio: 0.819 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram —0 Before Saturation --A After Saturation —) Rebound Hydro Consolidation - C - 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 6@5 ' Soil Description: Slightly Silty Sand January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf. 100.1 Initial Moisture, %: 6 Initial'Void Ratio: 0.665 Specific Gravity: . 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram 0 Before Saturation —:6 After Saturation I —e Rebound _ —f—Hydro Consolidation J f 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 mmv .!.// ///...® //MM //W: 0/ �L c Wo // /LLL/ / / C :LLLLLL :LLLLLL: MONNN LLL :: LLLLLL .. //.H//./....// NNW ///./////./ ..LL: LL W../L//././/..........//////W// /.//.../ /L/L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLwomm LLLL.�LLi L/LL'LL� LLLLLLLLLLL/'.::ML. ./// N�NO .. .. NOW ....//.WHIZ ON p LLLLLL L/LLL�R'/11L�L/ WLiN/ LLLi//�■ LL �/No MOWN/ / LC : LL..LC./.....W= LLLL .//MWE W / LI//W////////////�L LL/ aL / �L/ LLL./NNW ALL / LLLLLL: OBBB/ /W....../..WW.W//ON=WOM = /LLLLLLLL////ENO /W L ./ L® _�_./.. ..�... 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 15 4.0 4.5 5.0 Consolidation Sladden Engineering - Revised 11/20/02+ One Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 & D5333 Job Number: 544-3001 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Sample ID: 9@5 Soil Description: Silty Sand it, -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -s -9 -10 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 January 17, 2003 Initial Dry Density, pcf. 10 0. 2) Initial Moisture, %: 21 Initial Void Ratio: 0.663 Specific Gravity: 2.67 % Change in Height vs Normal Presssure Diagram I —0 Before Saturation —A After Saturation ) Rebound —Hydro Consolidation E- � �E.■ . ` .EPEE■-E EE . m ■■■� M o . ■C-■■EE. ..1. :Emm■aa maWmmEmmEa■m■m mom . EEE=Z.'...:= .■. ■.ammo■ ... W Eli - m■. W ......m.■.■.. ....a■■■■■■■■■■.�...EEWWW....... ■mmWmmm■■m■mmm .mm -EEmalm=m mm mmWmmm ■mom. ■ mm ■aammmmmm■aam Mmm■■ mmmm ■■■■EmaammMMMMMM■mE®-■mmmmm�WWmm■m■�■-i-EWmmmm ■mmm mmmmm mmmmm ■mm mm mmmammm Wm �.mE■EEa■■omE.000a. .. . ............ ...E■■Wlwm .......W...E. ■m.m m-iaEE ...W.mmma■■..a■■■■mIERMUmMMUMMM . E..m. low m - �ME m m EmE Emom% no ■EEEEE �� .. mmmm m . W.■■ ma mm■■■ :� com E M .E E W 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 ('unsnlida�ion Sladden Engineering Revised 11/20/02 Expansion Index r ASTM D 4829/UBC 29-2 Job Number: 544-3001 Date: 1/17/03 Job Name: Monroe & Ave 52 Tech: Leslie Lab ID: Sample ID: B 1 @ 0-5 Soil Description: ' Wt of Soil + Ring: 540.0 Weight of Ring: 179.0 Wt of Wet Soil: 361.0, Percent Moisture: F_ 14% Wet Density, pcf- 109.4 Dry Denstiy, pcf- 96.0 Saturation: 50`.0 Expansion Rack # Date/Time 1/21/03 8:50 AM Initial Reading 0.500 Final Redding 0.S03 Expansion Index 3 (Final -Initial) a 1000 El Sladden Engineering Revised 12/10/02 ANAHEIM TEST LAB ORATORY 3008 S. ORANGE AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92707 PHONE (714) 549-7267 • i r TO: SLADDEN ENGINEERING: 6782 STANTON .AVE. SUITE E DATE: 1 /1 5/03 BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 P.O. No.Chain of Custody + Shipper No. ' ATTN: BRETT/DAVE . • Lab. No. A-2575 Specification: Material: SOIL PROJECT: #544-3001 MONROE & AVE. 52 B1 @ 0-5' ANALYTICAL REPORT CORROSION SERIES • SUMMARY OF DATA PH SOLUBLE SULFATES SOLUBLE .CHLORIDES MIN. RESISTIVITY per Ca. 417 per Ca. 422 per Ca. 643 ppm ppm ohm -cm 8.0 100 131 2,059 FORM d2 APPENDIX C 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria 1'ebruary 6, 2003 -14- Project No. 544-3001 03-02-068 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN INFORMATION -file International Conference of Building Officials 1997 Uniform Building Code contains substantial revisions and additions to the earthquake engineering section in Chapter 16. Concepts contained in the code that will be relevant to construction of the proposed sh'uctures are summarized below. Ground shaking is expected to be the primary hazard most likely to affect the site, based upon proximity to significant faults capable of generating large earthquakes. Major. fault zones considered to be most likely to create strop.ty ground shaking at the site are listed below. Fault Zone Approximate Distance From Site Fault Type 1997 UBC San Andreas 8.9 km A San Jacinto 32.7 km A Based on our field observations and understanding of local geologic conditions, the soil profile type jud`,ed applicable torthis site is So, generally described as stiff or dense soil. The site is located within UBC Seismic Zone 4. The following table presents additional coefficients and factors relevant to seismic mitigation for new construction upon adoption of the 1997 code. . Near -Source Near -Source Seismic Seismic Seismic Source Acceleration Factor, N, Velocity Factor, N,, Coefficient C. c Coefficient C,: San Andreas 1.04 1.28 0.44N, 0.64N,. San Jacinto 1.0 1.0 0.44N, 0 64N Sla(Men Engineering * * * E Q F A U L T * * * Version 3.00 * * DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS JOB NUMBER: 544-3001 DATE: 01-17-2003 JOB NAME: SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street Indio Area Riverside County, California CALCULATION NAME: Test Run Analysis FAULT -DATA -FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.6689 SITE LONGITUDE: 116.2383 SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - SOIL (310) UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=Sigma): M Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cd_2drp SCOND: 0 Basement Depth:_ 5.00 km Campbell SSR: Campbell SHR: COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT -DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.DAT MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 0.0 --------------- EQFAULT SUMMARY --------------- ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- J (ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE J------------------------------- ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE I MAXIMUM I PEAK JEST. SITE FAULT NAME mi (km) :JEARTHQUAKEI SITE JINTENSITY J MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. g JMOD.MERC_ SAN ANDREAS - Coachella I 5.5( 8.9)1 '7..1 J 0.366 i IX SAN ANDREAS - Southern I 5.5( 8.9)I 7.4 I 0.429 X SAN JACINTO-ANZA J 20.3( 32.7)1 7.2 I 0.158 J VIII BURNT MTN.. J 20.7( 33.3)1 6.4 J 0.102 J VII SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK I 21.3( 34.3)I 6.8 I 0.123 J VII EUREKA PEAK I 21.4( 34:4)I 6.4 J 0.100 I VII SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino i 22.3( 35.9)1 7.3 J 0.155 I VIII SAN JACINTO - BORREGO J 32.5( 52.3)I 6.6 I 0.080 I VII PINTO MOUNTAIN I 33.1( 53.2)1 7.0 I 0.098 J VII EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. J 33.9( 54.5)I 6.9 J 0.091 J VII PISGAH-BULLION MTN.-MESQUITE LK I 35.0( 56.4)1 7.1 I 0.099 I VII LANDERS I 35.7( 57.4)1 7.3 I 0.108 I VII BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE I 37.8( 60.8)1 6.4 i 0.064 I VI EARTHQUAKE VALLEY J 39.0( 62.8)I 6.5 I 0.066 I VI SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY I 39.3(" 63.3)I 6.9 J '0.081 J VII NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) I 40.8( 65.7)1 6.7 I 0.086 J VII ELSINORE-JULIAN I 43.0( 69.2)I 7.1 I 0.084 I VII ELMORE RANCH J 45.2( 72.7)I 6.6 I 0.062 VI JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) I 46.4( 74.7)) 6.7 J 0.064 VI CALICO - HIDALGO J 47.7( 76.7)I 7.1 I 0.078 I VII ELSINORE-TEMECULA I 48.9( 78.7)1 6.8 J 0.065 VI ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN I 49.2( 79.1)I 6.8 i 0.065 I VI SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) 1 50.1(' 80.7)J 6.6 J 0.057 I VI SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto) 50.8( 81.8)I 6.6 I 0.057 J VI LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGSJ 52.5( 84.5)1 7.3 0.080 I VII NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) I 53.1( 85.4)I 7.0 I 0.083 VII HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT J 60.6( 97.5)1 7.1 J 0.065 I VI SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO I 62.3( 100.2)1 6.7 I 0.051 I VI ELSINORE-GLEN IVY J 63.8( 102.7)1 6.8 i 0.053 VI IMPERIAL I 64.9( 104.4)1 7.0 I 0.058 J VI LAGUNA SALADA J 68.4( 110.0)I 7.0 J 0.056 VI CLEGHORN 69.9( 112.5)1 6.5 I 0.042 I VI ROSE CANYON I 76.9( 123.7)I 6.9 I 0.048 J VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) I 77.1( 124.1)I 6.9 I 0.048 1 VI CHINO -CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) J 77.2( 124.3)I 6.7 I 0.053 J VI CUCAMONGA I 77.4( 124.6)1 7.0 I 0.062 J VI WHITTIER I 81.5( 131.1)I 6.8 J 0.044 I VI SAN ANDREAS - Mojave 1 86.5( 139.2)1 7.1 0.049 J VI SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture J '86.5( 139.2)I 7.8 J 0.071 J VI SAN JOSE I 89.0( 143.2)1 6.5 0.043 VI ------------------------------ DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ------------------------------ Page 2 (ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE ---------L--------------------- ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE MAXIMUM I PEAK JEST. SITE FAULT NAME mi (km) JEARTHQUAKEI SITE JINTENSITY MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. g IMOD.MERC. CORONADO BANK 91.8( 147.7)I 7.4 0.055 1 VI SIERRA MADRE 91.8( 147.8)I 7.0 0.054 I VI GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE 1 91.9( 147.9)I 6.9 0.042 1 VI ELYSIAN PARK THRUST 1 93.8( 151.0)J 6.7 I 0.045 VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) 97.1( 156.2)I 6.9 0.040 V -END OF SEARCH- 45 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE SAN ANDREAS, - Coachella FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.5 MILES (8.9 kn!) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM -EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.4290 g CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street / fndio Area 1I 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 -4uu -suu -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Oj STRIKE -SLIP FAULTS 5) Boore et al-. '(1997) Horiz. - SOIL (3.110). M=5 M=6 ' M=7 M=8 1 .01 .001 1 10 100 Distance radist] (km)' DIP -SLIP FAULTS 5) Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - SOIL (310) M=5_ M=6 M=7 M=g BLIND -THRUST FAULTS 5)..Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - 801L (310) r ' M=5 M=6 M=7 M=8 1 1•1 a� U U Q .01 .001 t . 1 10 100 _ Distance [adist1 (km) 51 3 i MAXIMUM EARTHQUAKES SWC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street / Indio Area it .01 .001 EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES & DISTANCES S WC Avenue 52 & Monroe Street /, Indio Area 7.75 7.50 7.25 a� 7.00. c� 6.75, 6.50 `pSPECTIOp A 1S Ff �r14NO. ORO --`--- �07- —/ le6w*1�1 a�� d J J�aa� TIMBER PRODUCTS INSPECTION, INC. dba GENERAL TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY 105 SE 124' AVENUE VANCOUVER, WA 98684 We are an inspection agency recognized by the International Conference of Building Officials. Council of American Building Officials NER — QA275 S: This is to verify that: a SPATES FABRICATORS, INC ' 85-435 . MIDDLETON STREET THERMAL, CA 92274 is under our Audited Quality Control Program and has been since: JUNE, 1990 We audit the production Quarterly under the Uniform Building Code Section 2304.4.4. .% _' MANAGER OF WESTERN TRUSS DIVISION E' REPORTTAR ER-5352 Reissued July 1, 2001 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. • 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 . www.icboes.org Filing Category: DESIGN -Wood (038) A W VV. METAL CONNECTOR PLATE FOR WOOD TRUSSES ALPINE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC. 1950 MARLEY DRIVE HAINES CITY, FLORIDA 33844 1.0 SUBJECT WAVE- Metal Connector Plate for Wood Trusses. 2.0 DESCRIPTION 2.1 General: The WAVE plate is a metal connector plate for wood trusses. The plates are manufactured from galvanized steel in various lengths and widths and have integral teeth that are designed to laterally transmit loads between truss wood members. Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. 2.2 Materials: The WAVE plate is manufactured from No. 20 gage [0.0356 inch (0.90 mm)], ASTM A 653-94 SQ. Grade 40, structural - quality steel with a hot -dipped galvanized coating designated G60. The WAVE plate has slots approximately 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) long by 0.12 inch (3.0 mm) wide that have been punched along the longitudinal axis of the plate. Each punched slot forms two opposite -facing, sharply pointed teeth protruding at right angles from the parent metal. The punched slots are spaced approximately 1/4 inch (6.4 mm) on center across the width of the plate and approximately 1 inch (25.4 mm) on cen- ter along the length of the plate, with adjacent longitudinal rows staggered 0.06 inch (1.5 mm). Connector plates are available in 1-inch (25.4 mm) increments of width and length. Minimum plate width and length are 1 inch (25.4 mm) and 2 inches (51 mm), respectively. See Figure 5 for details of plate dimensions. There are 8 teeth per square inch (1.24 teeth per square centimeter) of plate surface. The length of each tooth, includ- ing the thickness of the parent metal, is approximately 0.41 inch (10.4 mm), and the width of each tooth is approximately 0.12 inch (3.05 mm). The shank of each tooth is concave and the tip of each tooth is twisted approximately 40 degrees with respect to the plate width. 2.3 ,Allowable Loads: Tables 1, 2 and 3 show allowable lateral loads, tension loads And shear loads for the WAVE metal plate connectors. Also, refer to Figures 1, 2 and 3 for load conditions. These values are based on the National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building department when requested by the building official. 2.3.1 Lateral Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed to transfer the required load without exceeding the allowable load per square inch of plate contact area, as determined by species, the orientation of the teeth relative to the load, and the direction of load relative to grain. Design for lateral resistance must be in accordance with Section 11.2.1 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 1 shows allowable lateral loads for the metal connector plates. 2.3.2 Tension Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for tension capacity, based on the orienta- tion of the metal connector plate relative to the direction of the load. Design for tension must be in accordance with Section 11.2.2 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. Table 2 shows allowable tension loads (in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connector plates, based on the net section of the metal connector plates for tension joints, which is the allow- able tensile.stress of the metal multiplied by the metal con- nector plate tensile effectiveness ratio. 2.3.3 Shear Resistance: Each metal connector plate must be designed for shear capacity, based on the orientation of the plate relative to all possible lines of shear. Design for shear must be in accordance with Section 11.2.3 of ANSI/TPI 1-1995. The net section of the metal connector plates for heel joints and otherjoints involving shear must be designed using the, allowable shear values (shown in Table 3 in units of pounds per lineal inch per pair of plates) for the metal connec- tor'plates, which is the allowable shear stress of the metal multiplied by the shear resistance effectiveness ratios shown in.Table 3. 2.3.4• Metal Plate Reductions: Several allowable -load re- duction factorsforthe metal plates must be considered cumu- latively, when applicable, in the design of metal connector plates used in fabricated wood trusses. The reduction factors to be considered cumulatively are as follows: 1. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by a strength reduction factor, OR, shown in Table 4, when the plates are installed in lumber with a single -pass, full -embedment roller sys- tem having minimum roller diameters equal to 18 inches (457 mm). This reduction does not apply to embedment hydraulic -platen presses, multiple roller presses that use partial'embedment followed by full embedment rollers, or combinations of partial embedment roller/hydraulic-plat- en presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller. When trusses are fabricated with single -pass roller press- es, the calculations for the truss design submitted to the building department for approval must specify the mini- mum diameter of the roller press and the appropriate strength -reduction factor from this report. 2. Allowable lateral resistance values for the WAVE metal connector plates must be reduced by 15 percent when the plates are installed on the narrow face of truss lumber members. 3. Allowable lateral resistance values must be reduced by 20 percent when the WAVE metal connector plates are installed in lumber having a moisture content greater than 19 percent at the time of truss fabrication. REPoRTs-an• nut to he consented as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not aperiliculk addressed. nor arc then to he eonstnrrd as an ondurremrnt q/ the subject nl the report or a recommendation jor its lose. rhere is nunrrunn' Eruluunutr 5rn rc`. Inc.. ecpnaad as r nphe-,1.,,, to non• finding or m r other uner in thu report. or as to an hr ICBU proton cut•ard o hr the report. �-I Copyright .€: 200t r Page 7 of 5 4. Allowable lateral resistance values for WAVE metal con- nector plates installed at the heel joint of a fabricated wood truss must be reduced by the heel-yoint reduction factor. HR, as follows: HR = 0.85 - 0.05 (12 tan 6 - 2.0) where: 0.65 <_ HR <_ 0.85 B = angle between lines of action of the top and bottom chords shown in Figure 4. This heel -joint reduction factor does not apply to conditions with top chord slopes greater than 12:12. 2.3.5 Combined Shear and Tension: Each WAVE metal connector plate must be designed for combined shear and tension capacity, based on the orientation of the metal con- nector plate relative to the directions of loading. Design for combined shear and tension must be in accordance with Sec- tion 11.2.4 of ANSVTPI 1-1995. 2.3.6 Combined Flexure and Axial Loading: Metal con- nector plates designed only for axial forces are permitted as splices in the top and bottom chord located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calculated point of zero moment. Design of metal connector plates located at splices in the top and bot- tom chord not located within 12 inches (305 mm) of the calcu- lated point of zero moment must include combined flexure and axial stresses. 2.4 Truss Design: Plans and calculations must be submitted to the building offi- cial for the trusses using metal connector plates described in this report. The truss design must show compliance with the code and accepted engineering principles. Allowable loads for the metal connector plates may be increased for duration of load in accordance with Section 2335.5 of the code. Cal- culations need to specify the deflection ratio or the maximum deflection for live and total load. For each truss design.draw- ing, the following information, at a minimum, should be speci- fied by the design engineer: 1. Truss slope or depth, span and spacing. 2. Dimensioned location of truss joints. 3. Model, size and dimensioned location of metal connector plates at each joint. 4. Truss chord and web lumber size, species and grade. 5. Required bearing widths at truss supports. 6. Top and bottom chord live and dead loads, concentrated loads and their locations, and controlling wind or earth- quake loads. 7. Design calculations conforming to ANSI/TPI 1-1995 and any adjustments to lumber -and -metal -connector -plate al- lowable values for conditions of use. 2.5 Truss Fabrication: - Plate connectors shall be installed by an approved truss fabri- cator who has an approved quality assurance program cover- ing the wood truss manufacturing and inspection process in accordance with Sections 2343.7 and 2343.8 of the code and Section 4 ofANSI/TPI 1-1995, National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction. The allow- able loads recognized in this report are for plates that are pressed into wood truss members using hydraulic or pneu- matic embedment presses; multiple roller presses that use, partial embedment followed by full embedment rollers; com- binations of partial embed -rent roller/hydraulic or pneumatic presses that feed trusses into a stationary finish roller press: or, if the adjustment factors given in Table 4 are used, single - pass roller presses. When truss fabricators use single -pass roller presses, the r rollers must have minimum 18-inch (457 mm) diameters. Plates embedded with a single -pass, full -embedment roller press must be preset before passing through the roller press I by striking at least two opposite corners of each plate with a hammer. ' 2.6 Identification: Each WAVE metal connector plate is embossed with the iden- tifying mark `WAVE" stamped into the parent metal. ' 3.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED Test data in accordance with Natioral Design Standard for 'Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, ANSI/TPI 1-1995. 4.0 FINDINGS That the WAVE metal connector plate for wood trusses complies with the 1997 Uniform Building Code", subject } to the following conditions: j 4.1 For the trusses using metal connector plates de- scribed In this report, plans and calculations must be submitted to the building official. 4.2 The metal connector plates are designed to trans- fer the required loads In accordance with the de- sign formulae In ANSI/TPI 1-1995. A copy of the ANSI/TPI 1-1995 standard must be supplied to the building 'department when this is requested by the building official. 4.3 The allowable loads for the metal connector plates must comply with this evaluation report. 4.4 Teeth of metal connector plates placed in knots, bark, pitch pockets, holes, and joint gaps are con- sidered Ineffective. 4.5 Metal connector plates are installed in pairs on op- posite faces of truss members connected by the plates. 4.6 Trusses using metal connector plates described in this report must be fabricated by a truss fabricator approved by the building official In accordance with Sections 2311.6 and 2343.8 of the code. 4.7 Allowable loads stwwn in the tables In this report ..,may be increased for duration of load In accord- ance with Section 2335.5 of the code. 4.8 Application of the allowable loads (shown in the tables in this report) for metal connector plates em- bedded in lumber treated with fire -resistive chemi- cals is outside the scope of this report. 4.9 Where one-hourfire-resistive rating Is required for trusses using WAVE connectors, see evaluation re- ports ER-1632 and ER-5640. This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ER-5352 TABLE t—ALLOWABLE LATERAL P.ESISTANCE VALUES FOR THE WAVE" METAL CONNECTOR PLATE, iUMfi EF C°t'E DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTM OF PLATE2.2 � PLATE MODEL AA EA AE EE Sprites S_recific Gravity Allowable LOW Per Place 1pounOs per square inch of plate contact araal2 METAL PLATE VALUES RATED BY GROSS AREA METHOD Douglas :':r — -- 0 49 j 206 Hem -fit U ; —_— 164 109 20i U6 17q Southern P:ne i 0. j 6 109 163 170 WAVE' Spruce -pine.! -it _%_ 0�: 159 109 106 118 kA CT1 L PL TV V A ALES RATED BY SEMI -NET AREA NIETHOD' Douglas to I U.49 775-1 195 1_15 153 Hem-tir 0.43JE�20808 208 134 ;06 124 Southern pine 0.55275 195 163 170 Spruce -pine -fir ( 0.12 130 106 IIB For Sl: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. 1 psi - 6.39 kPa. 'See Figure I for a description of plate orientation. 'The tabulated values are for a single plate. The values are doubled for plates installed on both faces of a joint if area is calculated for a single plate. 3Metal connector plates must be installed to pairs on opposite faces of truss members connected by plates. 'For metal plates rated by the semi -net area method. the end distance of'.,, inch, measured parallel to grain, must be excluded when determing the metal plate cove Se for each member of a joint. See Figure 2 for examples of lolnts affected by the mandatory reduction of plate eoveraac. Load Load AA Orientation AE Orientation Load Load I I I I I I I I I I I I I` t TI',lal'�I,lil'.I:•I IIIIIIIIIIII �� ' =j• :1 . IIIIIIIIIIII . :fl�l.l'�t FIGURE 1—PLATE ORIENTATIONS EA Orientation EE Orientation E.R.- 535 V For I 1: Inch -5.4 mm ' S 2 _. FIGURE 2—END DISTANCE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEMI -NET AREA METHOD TABLE 2-ALLOWABLE TENSION VALUES AND TENSION EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE, WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATET DIRECTION OF LOAD WITH REiiFRC TO LEf,'GTH OF PLATE t p' p0• p• � 90, Allowable Tension Load PLATE MODEL (pounds per llnaar Inch per pair of plats) Tension Load EMciency Ratio WAVE ��` 349 0 186 Fur 3t: i psi . 6.89 kr2. , IS" Figure 3 for a description of plalc oricn:3:e(ir.. 'Th e length of plate refers to the dimenswn of ;hc :,vv;Ijdinal axis of the area of the plate from Ahich the plate teeth were sheared dur:ne. -'etc iabncanon. Length Load - - - - - - Load Load a) 0' Plate Orientation rage a OT Width Load ' -> FIGURE 3—PLATE LENGTH AND WIDTH FOR TENSION ORIENTATION ' TABLE 3—ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUES AND SHEAR EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR THE WAVE" METAL CONNECTOR PI -.ATE i (b) 90e Plate Orientation OIRECTION OF L040 WITH RESPECT TO LENOTM OF ►LATE OIRECTION OF LOAD WrN RESPECT T4 LENCT H OF PLATE PLATE 0' 7p' 60 T gp• 120• 150' 0• �0• fro' 90, I .2w tso. MODEL Allowable Shear Load (pounds per linear inch per pair of plates) Shear Lo" Efflciancy Ratio .. WAVE' 656 S61 o6q :67 5:9 ::6 0.:63 0.'? 9 0.3?] ? t�.' 7—n a 0 »'- _• .... . ya. - n 41F wr A. Page 5 of 5 ER-5352 TABLE 4—ALLOWABLE LATERAL LOAD ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, OR FOR THE WAVE- METAL CONNECTOR PLATE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM 18-INCH-DIAMETER SINGLE -PASS ROLLER PRESSES PLATE MODEL LUMBER SPECIES SPECIFIC GRAVITYI DIRECTION OF GRAIN AND LOAD WITH RESPECT TO LENGTH OF PLATE AA EA AE EE WAVE " 0.49 0.815 0.885 0.815 0.885 0.50 0.870 0.905 0.870 0.905 ror at: I mcn = z..4 mm. 'The QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.49 applies to all wood species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.49 or lower. and the QR value for the lumber species specific gravity of 0.50 applies to all lumber species combinations with average published specific gravity of 0.50 or higher. ® 0 FIGURE 4—HEEL JOINTS TO WHICH THE REDUCTION FACTOR, HR, APPLIES Plate Length Plate Width, F , - 0.25 in (6.]5 mm) o.c. between slots L r 0.12 in (3.05 nn) I \ I slot width. f \ I 1 ,in (25.n Sl o.c. 0.5 in (12.7 mm) between slots uFFset between slut length idjacent slots 0.06 in (1.52 mm) -1- 0.0356 in (minimum) PLATE AVAILABLE IN INCREMENTS OF I IN (25.4 r-im). For Sl: I inch = 25.4 mm. FIGURE 5—WAVE PLATE' DIMENSIONS