The URL can be used to link to this page

Citrus - Mandarina TR 24890-1 10-0344 (SFD) (Plans 1 & 2) 2007/2008 Code UpdateBMI& / City of La Quinta rAAA-?lding 8r Safety Division � BuiP-O. Box 1504, 78-495 CaUe Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 - (760) 777-7012 Building Permit Application and Tracking Sheet Permit # Project Address: 2 O - / `r3 i- i¢� Owner's Name: Qj A P. Number. - Co - ZI O — O 1 S Address: pg-�� Legal Description: City, ST, Zip C., GI ?Y GA 9?-7-34 Contractor:.0l4 SE c • pTel hone: _ 6 9- 7 l Address: 7 S -�.� 5•��7L�G Project Description: City, ST, Zip:QqVtUg G 7"y C�19 22 4 115 A1424-2 0 Telephone. Q _ 14 CEO / / City Lic. #: State Lic. #: -75O q S'j Arch., Engr., Designer Address: 9444 ixy?o,,I V City, ST, Zip: CA 9z Construction Type: Occupancy: Telephone: 81bg _ 3 _2V ( / �/ , State Lic. #: C-ol g Project type (circle one): ew Add'n Alter epair Demo 3t15-Pen,�� Sq. Ft: 3t9$- Pt4mz # Stories: # Units: Name of Contact Person: AT L T Telephone # of Contact Person: ?60 2 p Estimated Value of Project: APPLICANT: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE # Submittal Req'd Ree'd TRACMG PERMIT FEES Plan Sets p� Plan Cheek submitted ( Item Amount Structural Calcs. a Reviewed, ready fo eetions S Plan Ch t Truss Cala. Called Contact Person Plan eels Ba ce Tide 24 Cafes. Plana picked up ctio Y Flood plain plan Plans resubmitted M icai Grading plan l000l 2'! Review, ready for recdons/Issue eetricai Snbcontactor List all Coma erson Plumbing Grant Deed eked n S.M L H O.A Approval Plans msub it ed Grading IN HOUSE:- 7n0 i , read or eorrectionatissue Developer impact Fee Planning pr lled ntact Person A.LP.P. Pub. Appr D f permit issue School Fees Total Permit Fees 30-875-Date Palm Dr., ste C-1 Cathedral City, CA 92234 Tel (760) 969=1400 GGI-iA COMPANIESFax (760) 322-6333 www.ghacompanies.com April 20,2010 City of La Quinta Building & Safety Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Mandarina at the Citrus: Dear Sirs, GHA Enterprises is the general contractor and minority ownership partner. in the Mandarina 'at the, Citrus project. This was- 20 lots previously begun by Tahiti Partners. Two homes were 100% completed, nine homes were permitted and construction completed (and inspected) through. poured concrete slabs. At that time the project halted, and later sold. We are now bringing the project back to life with the intention to complete the nine homes already started, and pending sales, move forward with the remaining nine lots.: As you can imagine we've received very warm reception and approval from. the Citrus Homeowners Association. Per my earlier over-the-counter conversations with the building; engineering, and planning departments,. we, were directed to re -submit to the building. department updated arch itectural'plans (including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing sheets), structural plans and calculations, and, revised title 24 calcu.lations. These plans are now complete and current with all code changes to date. Since we are not intending to change the homes or locations, we were advised by the engineering department that the existing and approved precise grading plan was sufficient.for.completion of these units.- An as -built plan will be submitted upon completion of the homes, prior.to final inspections should and .changes . occur to the precise grading. The only..contemplated change is. the size%location of the swimming pools. 'We will submit for separate plan check and permit (as required by the city) for all swimming pools on this project Please see the attached transmittal letter regarding our submittal for plan check of these code updated plans. Should you have any questions, please feel free. to contact me. Sincerely,, Pat Schlichfi GHA Enterprises Sr. Project manager. IT'RtJS 'COURSE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION June 8, 2010 GHA Communities c/o Mario J. Gonzales; President / C.E.O. • 30-875 Date Palm Drive, Suite C Cathedral City, CA 92234 . Re: Proposed Revisions to the Approved Plans ("Proposed Revisions") Dear Mr. Gonzales: Ed The Board of Directors has reviewed the Proposed Revisions to the Approved Plans consistent with Paragraph 6b of the First Amendment to the Supplementary Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, Reservation of Easements, recorded September 23, 2009 as Instrument Number: 2009- 0495286 ("Supplementary Declaration") and, as such, the Board of Directors and the Associations Architectural Committee provide you with the following responses: 1) Except as noted in Paragraphs 2 and 4 below, The Citrus Course Homeowners Association ("HOA") approves the Proposed Revisions to bring them up to date with changes in the Uniform Building Code required by the City of La Quinta (per Plan 1 and Plan 2 dated April 20, 2010); 2) The HOA does NOT approve the loft option / second story enclosing the veranda/view deck to livable space for Plan I and/or Plan 2. For your information, we enclose herein a copy of Architectural Meeting Minutes, dated March 22, 2006 where this issue was previously addressed by your predecessor -in -interest. All concerned understood that the Association would not approve a loft / second story for livable space. Also, for your information, we refer you to Section 11.26 of the CC&Rs which provides "...No two story single family Residences shall be. allowed in the Development." Additionally, you are in a unique location in a scenic corridor to the balance of the Citrus Course community which also has a median parkway landscape strip ("Parkway Strip"). The location of the Parkway Strip is adjacent to your property and no street parking is permitted based upon safety concerns in that location. 3) The HOA will approve the optional small patios for Plan I and Plan 2. 4) The HOA will not allow any mass areas of stone veneer for Plan i and/or Plan 2 but will accept small "eye brow" stone details over the arch areas and windows, acting as stone headers. P.O 13ox 12920 Yalni Desert, CA 92255 " 41-865 Boardwalk, Suite 101, Mahn Desert, Cali(oniia 760.346.9000 ' FAX 760.346.9997 ` «nvw.c-itnisc•ourselioa.coin GHA Communities c/o Mario J. Gonzales Proposed Revisions to the Approved Plans (`'Proposed Revisions") Page 2 Based upon the foregoing, please revise your plans to reflect all of the foregoing and resubmit the revised plans to the. Association's Architectural Committee and Board of Directors for review. So there is no misunderstanding, the current plans (unless revised as indicated above) are not approved. - Finally, we have spoken with our corporate counsel, Wayne Guralnick, relative to your claims that you have some sort of Declarant's rights and, without waiving any attorney / client privilege, he indicated to us that you have no such Declarant's rights. Further, even if you did have such Declarant's rights, the Supplementary Declaration, Section 6b requires that any proposed modification of the Approved Plans (as defined within said Supplementary. Declaration), must be submitted to the Association for review and approval by the Associations Architectural Committee. We look forward to receipt of your revised plans as soon as you are able to provide same. Sincerely, On behalf of the Board of Directors and Architectural Committee Barbara Vanscoder, CCAM Association Manager Enclosure cc: Board of Directors, Citrus Course Homeowners Association Wayne Guralnick, Legal Counsel 3M75 Date Palm Dr.; ste C-1 Cathedral City, CA 92234 Tel (760) 969-1400 �►+� coMa�aiEs Fax (760) 322-6333 www. Qhacompanies:com June 14, 2010 The Citrus Club, Architectural Committee C/O Albert Association Management 41-865 Boardwalk, suite 101 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Attn. Barbara Vanscoder Re: Mandarina at the Citrus Barbara, - We are in receipt of the Architectural Committee's letter dated June 10 2010, please note the following clarifications and response. 1) 'The wrought iron gates do not have any backing attached. The view is continuous thought the iron gate to the home beyond. Y 2) The windows are clear, low e, double paned glass. The windows are not tinted. 3) The garage doors are stained cedar wood, consistent with the color boards. 4) Color Boards are included with this letter. 5) We are also acknowledging that exterior stone veneer will only be included as "eyebrows" over windows, or in areas inside the courtyard and not visible from the street. -• 6) We are acknowledging the enclosed verandas are not approved by the Architectural Committee. We do however look forward to the Committee reconsidering this issue upon submittal of additional information from the Developer. We look forward to moving forward with this project, in the hopes this will bring success to all of our collective objectives. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Cc; Don Brooks Blaine Larsen Mario Gonzales ;:. . YOUNG ENGINEERING SERVICES www.v lu n r:com 71-780 San Jacinto Dr_ Ste. E2, Rancho Mirage;, Ca;92270 ph. (766) 834-8860 fax (760) 834-8861 Letter of Transmittal To: City of La Quinta Today's Date: 8-18-10 - 78-495 Calle Tampico City Due Date: 8-13-10 La Quinta, CA 92253 Project Address: Citrus Mandarina Attn: Phillip Plan Check #: 10-344 Submittal: ❑ 15t ❑ 4th ❑ 2nd ❑ 5th ® 3�d ❑ Other: We are forwarding: ® By Messenger ❑ By Mail (Fed Ex or UPS) ❑ Your Pickup Includes: # Of Descriptions: Includes: # Of Descriptions: - ' Copies: Copies: s ❑ Structural Plans ® 1 Revised Structural Plans ❑ Struct. Calcs ❑ Revised Struct. Calcs ® 1 Truss Calculations ❑ Revised Truss 1 Soils Report ❑ Revised Soils Report ® 1 Structural Comment List ❑ Approved Structural Plans ® 3 Redlined Structural Plans ❑ Approved Structural Calcs ❑ Redlined Structural Calcs ❑ Approved Truss Calcs ❑ Redlined Truss Calcs ® 2 Revised Struct Plan Sht SD-4, S-2.3 ❑ Redlined Soils Reports ® 1 Other: Soils Update Letter ' Comments: Structural content is approvable. Please insert plan sheets SD-4 and S-2.3 into the 2"d set of structural plans. If you have any questions please call. This Material Sent for: , ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Your Review ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ At the request of: ' Other: ❑ , By: John W. Thompson ' Rancho Mirage Office : ® (760) 834-8860 Other. ❑ t 0Earth Systems 1,15F Southwest 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203 (760)345-1588 (800)924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 July 25, 2010 File No.: 10404-03 Doc. No.: 10-07-784 Citrus 18 Group, LLC. 30-875 Data Palm Drive, Unit C Cathedral City, California 92234 Attention: Mr. Pat Schlicht Subject: -Foundation Plan Review and'Geotechnical Engineering Report Update, with, Supplemental Recommendations Project: Tract Map 24890-1; 20 Lots Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo La Quinta, California References: 1. Earth Systems Southwest, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Tract Map 24890, La Quinta, California, File No.: 10404-01, Doc. No.: 05-12-707, dated December 15, 2005, 2. Earth Systems Southwest, Bearing Values and Near Source Seismic Coefficients for Tract Map 24890-1, La Quinta, California, File No.: 10404-01, Doc. No.: 06-11-827, dated November 29, 2006. 3. Earth Systems Southwest, Report of Testing and Observations Performed during Grading for Tract 24890 Mandarina, La Quinta, California, File No.: 10404-02, Doc. No.: 07-01-839, dated January 29, 2007. 4. Earth Systems Southwest, Report of Testing Performed in the Plumbing Under Slabs and Driveway Approaches, Tract 24890 Mandarina, La Quinta, California, File No.: 10404-02, Doc. No.: 08-03-767, dated March 24, 2008. 5. Gouvis Engineering., Foundation Plans for Mandarina Project, La Quinta, California, Sheets S-1.1; 5- L I A, 5-2.1, 5-2.1 A, SN-1 A, SN-1 B, SN-1 C, and SD-1, Project No.: 62226, issue date: July 02, 2008, plot date July 12, 2010. As requested, Earth Systems Southwest [ESSW] has reviewed the above referenced reports for purposes of providing updated recommendations in conjunction with a review of the foundation plan and details. The referenced 20 lots (Tract Map 24800-1) are located west of the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. The lots are legally described at Assessors Parcel Numbers [APNs] 776-200-011, -001 through - 006, and 776-210-001 through -014. The site is currently previously graded and unoccupied land. Based on our review of the referenced foundation plans it is our opinion that the plans submitted to our office are applicable to the proposed development. As discussed in the Geotechnical Engineering Report and subsequent above referenced reports, the site soils exhibit very low expansion potential. K a July 25, 2010 2 File No.: 11404-03 Doc. No.: 10-07-784 Selected chemical analyses for corrosivity were not conducted on soil samples from the project site. Sampling and testing of near surface soil to address sulfate and corrosive characteristics should be performed. Prior near source seismic coefficients were based on the 2001 California Building Code [CBC], included below are the seismic coefficients based on the current 2007 CBC. Slabs -on -Grade Sub rg ade: Concrete slabs -on -grade and flatwork should be supported by compacted soil. Vapor Retarder: In areas of moisture -sensitive floor coverings, an appropriate vapor retarder should be installed to reduce moisture transmission from the subgrade soil to the slab. For these areas, an impermeable membrane (10-mil thickness) should underlie the floor slabs. The membrane should be covered with 2 inches of sand to help protect it during construction and to aid in concrete curing. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. Low -slump concrete should be used to help reduce the potential for concrete shrinkage. The effectiveness of the membrane is dependent upon its quality, the method ,of overlapping, its protection during construction, and the successful sealing of the membrane around utility lines. The following minimum slab recommendations are intended to address geotechnical concerns such as potential variations of the subgrade and are not to be construed as superseding any structural design. The design engineer and/or project architect should ensure compliance with SB800 with regards to moisture and moisture vapor. Slab Thickness and Reinforcement: Slab thickness and reinforcement of slabs -on -grade are contingent on the actual live loads and recommendations of the structural engineer or architect and the expansion index of the supporting soil. Concrete slabs -on -grade are not typically designed to accommodate construction loads. Therefore, the owner and design engineer should discuss the potential adverse effects of construction loads, such as cranes used to lift concrete panels, on the concrete slabs. Based upon our findings, a modulus of subgrade reaction of approximately 200 pounds per cubic inch can be used in concrete slab design for the expected very low expansion subgrade. Concrete slabs and flatwork should be a minimum of 4 inches thick (actual, not nominal). We suggest that the concrete slabs be reinforced in accordance with the structural engineer's recommendations or the mostly adopted building code, which ever is more stringent. Concrete floor slabs may either be monolithically placed with the foundations or doweled after footing placement. The thickness and reinforcing given are not intended. to supersede any structural requirements provided by the structural engineer. The project architect or geotechnical engineer should continually observe all reinforcing steel in slabs during placement of concrete to check for proper location within the slab. Control Joints: Control joints should be provided in all concrete slabs -on -grade at a maximum spacing of 36 times the slab thickness (12 feet maximum on -center, each way) as recommended by American Concrete Institute [ACI] guidelines. All joints should form approximately square patterns to reduce the potential for randomly oriented contraction cracks. Contraction joints in the slabs should be tooled at the time of the pour or saw cut ('/4 of slab depth) within 8 hours of concrete placement. Construction (cold) joints should consist of thickened butt joints with %2- EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTI4WEST ri 10 July 25, 2010 3 File No.: 11404-03 Doc. No.: 10-07-784 inch dowels at 18-inches on center or a thickened keyed -joint to resist vertical deflection at the joint. All construction joints in exterior flatwork. should be sealed to reduce the potential of moisture or foreign material intrusion. These procedures will reduce the.potential for randomly oriented cracks, but may not prevent them from occurring. Curing and Quality Control: The contractor should take precautions to reduce the potential of curling of slabs in this arid desert region using proper batching, placement, and curing methods. Curing is highly affected by temperature, wind, and humidity. Quality control procedures may be used, including trial batch mix designs, batch plant inspection, and on -site special inspection and testing. Mitigation of Soil Corrosivity on Concrete As previously stated mitigation of soil corrosivity on concrete was proposed by ESSW but never authorized by the client. Sampling and testing of near surface soil to address sulfate and corrosive characteristics can be performed. However, in the absence of test results, we recommend the following: Sulfate and other salts can attack the cement within concrete causing weakening of the cement matrix and eventual deterioration by raveling. This attack can be in the form of a physical attack or chemical attack whereby there may be a chemical reaction between the sulfate and the cement used in the concrete. According to ACI 318 as referenced by the 2007 CBC, if sulfate concentrations exceed 1000 ppm there will be special requirements. For this project, since no testing has been performed to date, we suggest using very severe sulfate ion concentration for design. ACI 318 requires that for very severe sulfate conditions Type V Portland Cement be used with a maximum water cement ratio of 0.45 using a 4,500 psi concrete mix (ACI 318 Table 4.3.1). Alternately, Type II Portland Cement with 15-20% Type F Flyash replacement may be used instead of Type V. Electrical resistivity is a process whereby metal (ferrous) objects in direct contact with soil may be subject to attack by electrochemical corrosion. This typically pertains to buried metal pipes, valves, culverts, etc. made of ferrous metal. To avoid this type of corrosion or to slow the process, buried metal objects are generally protected with waterproof resistant barriers, i.e. epoxy corrosion inhibitors, asphalt coatings, cathodic protection, or encapsulated with densely consolidated concrete. We suggest assuming a severe potential. for metal loss from electrochemical corrosion processes. A minimum concrete cover of cast -in -place concrete should be in accordance with Section 7.7 of the 2007 edition of ACI 318. Additionally, the concrete should be thoroughly vibrated during placement. The information provided above should be considered preliminary. These values can potentially change based on several factors, such as importing soil from another job site and the quality of construction water used during grading and subsequent landscape irrigation. In the event that supplemental tests are not performed, the structural drawings and details should be amended to reflect these recommendations. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Y . � July 25, 2010 4 File No.: 11404-03 Doc. No.: 10-07-784 ESSW, does not practice corrosion engineering. We recommend that a qualified corrosion engineer evaluate the corrosion potential on metal construction materials and concrete at the site to provide mitigation of corrosive effects, if further guidance is desired. Seismic Design Criteria This site is subject to strong ground shaking due to potential fault movements along the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults. Engineered design and earthquake -resistant construction increase safety and allow development of seismic areas. The minimum seismic design should comply with the 2007 edition of the California Building Code [CBC] and ASCE 7-05 using the seismic coefficients given in the table below. 2007 CBC (ASCE 7-05) Seismic Parameters Reference Seismic Category: D Table' 1613.5.6 Seismic Class: D Table 1613.5.2 Maximum Considered Earthquake [MCE] Ground Motion Short Period Spectral Response SS: 1.50 g Figure 1613.5 1 second Spectral Response, Si: 0.60 g Figure 1613.5 Site Coefficient, Fa: 1.00 Table 1613.5.3(1) Site Coefficient, F,,: 1.50 Table 1613.5.3(2) Design Earthquake Ground Motion Short Period Spectral Response, Sos 1.00 g 1 second Spectral Response, SDI 0.60 g The intent of the CBC lateral force requirements is to provide a structural design that will resist collapse to provide reasonable life safety from a major earthquake, but may experience some " structural and nonstructural damage. A fundamental tenet of seismic design is that inelastic yielding is allowed to adapt to the seismic demand on the structure. In other words, damage is allowed. The CBC lateral force requirements should be considered a minimum design. The owner and the designer may evaluate the level of risk and performance that is acceptable. Performance based criteria could be set in the design. The design engineer should exercise special care so that all components of the design are fully met with attention to providing a continuous load path. An adequate quality assurance and control program is urged during project construction to verify that the design plans and good construction practices are followed. This is especially important for sites lying close to the major seismic sources. Estimated peak horizontal site accelerations based upon a probabilistic analysis (10% probability .of occurrence in 50 years) is approximately 0.505 g for a stiff soil site. Actual accelerations may be more or less than estimated. Vertical accelerations are typically '/3 to 2/3 of the horizontal -accelerations, but can equal or exceed the horizontal accelerations, depending upon the local site effects and amplification. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST j , Z' k July 25, 2010 5 File No.: 11404-03 Doc. No.: 10-07-784 Closing I ' Except as modified in this report, it is our opinion that the referenced documents are applicable to the proposed development. We make no representation as to the accuracy of the dimensions, measurements, calculations, or any portion of the design. This report is issued with the understanding that the owner, or the owner's representative, has the responsibility to bring the information and recommendations contained herein to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project so that they are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. The owner, or the owner's representative, also has the responsibility to take the necessary steps to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors follow such recommendations. It is further understood that the owner or the owner's representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. Earth Systems Southwest [ESSW] has striven to provide our services in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this locality at this time. No warranty or guarantee is express or implied. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and the Client's authorized agents. This report is based on the assumption that an adequate program of client consultation, construction monitoring, and testing will be performed during the final design and construction phases to check compliance with these recommendations. Maintaining ESSW as the geotechnical consultant from beginning to end of the project will provide continuity of services. The geotechnical engineering firm providing tests and observations shall assume the responsibility of Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Should you have any questions concerning our report please give us a call and we will be pleased to assist you. Qapf ESS/Q�y.. _ Sincerely, 8i cy EARTH SYYST UTHW 18231 l/Y / EXP.301/11 Craig S. Hill, CE 38234 �QFCAL0 a LTR/csh/ajm 4 Distribution: 4/Citrus 18 Group, LLC 2/BD File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST e TAHITI PARTNERS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 5305 EAST SECOND STREET, SUITE 204 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90803 REPORT OF TESTING PERFORMED IN THE PLUMBING UNDER SLABS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES TRACT 24890, MANDARINA, LA QUINTA 20 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND POMELO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA [DA Z UINTA Y DEPT. March 24, 2008ED TION r ` 09 © 2008 Earth Systems Southwest Unauthorized use or copying of this documents strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Earth Systems Southwest. File No.: 10404-02 Doc. No.: 08-03-767 Earth Systems O/ Southwest 79-81113 Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203 (760)345-1588 (800)924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 March 24, 2008 File No.: 10404-02 Doc. No.: 08-03-767 Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 5305 East Second Street, Suite 204 Long Beach, California 90803 Attention: Mr. Phil Larsen Subject: Report of Field Density-Testing� Plumbing Under Slab and Driveway. Approaches Project: Tract 24890 — Mandarina, La Quinta 20 Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo La Quinta, California From February 23 through August 9, 2007, a representative of our firm performed density tests at the above referenced project. Tests were performed at random locations in accordance with ASTM D 2922-05, Method A or B; and ASTM D 3017-05 Nuclear Density Test Procedure. Tests were performed as per authorization of Mr. Geoffrey Payne. The estimated locations of the tests are presented on the attached drawing with their results being summarized on the attached test report sheet. Test results indicate that a minimum of 90% relative compaction has been obtained within the areas tested in the plumbing under slabs. Test results indicate that after reworking and retesting areas of low density, a minimum of 95% relative compaction has been obtained within the areas tested in the driveway approach subgrade. The maximum density -optimum moisture were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM D 1557-02, Method A, or C. Test results are as follows: Soil Description USCS Maximum Density Optimum Moisture Brown, Silt with sand, fine to SM 113.0 pcf 13.5% medium grained. Brown slightly sandy, silt ML 109.0 pcf 14.0% DISCUSSION: 1. The project is located within Tract 24890 on the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. 2. The contractor's work as described below was completed prior to our arrival on -site on the specified dates. ➢ February 23 through May 3, 2007: The plumbing under slab had been scheduled for testing. Twenty-nine compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. March 24, 2008 - 2 - File No.: 10404-02 Doc. No.: 08-03-767 ➢ August 7, 2007: The subgrade for driveways on Lots 15 and 17 had been scheduled for testing. However, test results indicated low density. Two compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ August 9, 2007: The areas of low density from August 7, 2007 had been reworked and scheduled for testing. Two compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. 3. A total of 33 compaction tests were performed. 4. With any manufactured product, there are statistical variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of tests used to measure its quality. As compared with other manufactured products, field construction usually presents large statistical. variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of test results used to measure its quality. Thus, even. with very careful observation and testing, it cannot be said that all parts of the product comply with the job requirements, and the degree of certainty is greater with full-time observation than it is with intermittent observations and testing. Therefore, our opinion based on observing and testing the work means that there is only a statistically -based, reasonable certainty that the work essentially complies with the job requirements.' 5. We make no warranty, express or implied, except that our services were performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and location. 6. It is recommended that Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) be provided the opportunity for a general review of any changes to the final design and/or location of the proposed structures in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted. If ESSW is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. 7. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. It is also the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the necessary steps are taken to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. It is further understood that the owner or his representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. If there are any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, tt� EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Reviewed by, Phillip D. Clanton Craig S. Hi )t ' Fxp.'033?1�j Supervisory Technician CE 38234 Compaction/pdc/csh/ajf Distribution: 4/Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 1/RC File 2/BD File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS JOB NAME: Tract 24890 - Mandarina, La Quinta 20 LOCATION: La Quinta, California FILE NO: 10404-02 DOC. NO: 08-03-767 Page 1 of 2 Test No Date Tested Description Elevation %Moisture ry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density Plumbinly, Backfill 1 02/23/07 Per Plan Lot 1 BOF 8.9 104.3 92 113.0 2 02/23/07 Per Plan, Lot 2 BOF 11.2 103.9 92 113.0 3 02/23/07 Per Plan Lot 3 BOF 13.1 105.6 93 113.0 4 02/23/07 Per Plan Lot 4 BOF 10.4 105.2 93 113.0 5 02/23/07 Per Plan Lot 15 BOF 9.6 102.7 91 113.0 . 6 02/27/07 Per Plan Lot 9 BOF 11.6 102.0 90 113.0 7 02/27/07 Per Plan Lot 8 BOF 10.5 103.4 91 113.0 8 02/27/07 Per Plan Lot 7 BOF 9.3 102.7 90 113.0 9 02/27/07 Per Plan Lot 6 BOF 10.2 104.2 92 113.0 10 02/27/07 Per Plan Lot 5 BOF 9.6 102.1 90 113.0 Plumbing Trenches 11 03/05/07 Per Plan Lot 1 PG 6.8 104.1 92 113.0 12 03/05/07 Per Plan Lot 2 PG 7.3 103.4 91 113.0 13 03/05/07 Per Plan Lot 15 PG 5.9 102.3 90 113.0 14 03/06/07 Per Plan Lot 3 PG 5.9 106.3 94 113.0 15 03/06/07 Per Plan Lot 3 PG 6.3 109.8 97 113.0 16 03/06/07 Per Plan Lot 4 PG 8.6 111.2 98 113.0 17 03/06/07 Per Plan Lot 4 PG 7.1 107.7 95 113.0 18 03/07/07 Per Plan Lot 5 PG 5.8 108.6 96 113.0 19 03/07/07 Per Plan Lot 5 PG 7.6 107.3 95 113.0 20 03/07/07 Per Plan Lot 6 PG 6.4 109.2 97 113.0 21 03/07/07 Per Plan Lot 6 PG 7.3 104.3 92 113.0 22 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 7 PG 7.8 103.4 92 113.0 23 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 7 PG 6.3 110.2 97 113.0 24 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 8 PG 8.1 107.6 95 113.0 25 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 8 PG 5.7 109.4 97 113.0 26 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 9 PG 6.2 108.6 96 113.0 27 03/08/07 Per Plan Lot 9, PG 7.8 104.1 92 113.0 28 05/03/078 Per Plan Lot 17 PG 12.3 105.3 93 113.0 29 05/03/078 Per Plan Lot 17 PG 13.1 103.1 91 113.0 March 24, 2008 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST 3 REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS JOB NAME: Tract 24890 — Mandarina, La Quinta 20 LOCATION: La Quinta, California FILE NO: 10404-02 DOC. NO: 08-03-767 Page 2 of 2 Test No Date Tested Description Elevation oMoisture Dry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density Drive Approaches 30 08/07/07 Per Plan Lot 17 SG 9.7 92.1 84* 109.0 31 08/07/07 Per Plan Lot 15 SG 8.9 100.2 92* 109.0 32 08/09/07 Retest #30 13.1 103.3 95** 109.0 33 08/09/07 Retest #31 10.7 103.6 95** 109.0 PG = Pad Grade SG = Subgrade F BOF = Bottom of Footing * = Failing Test * * = Passing Retest r March 24, 2008 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST !: f � I � I i i I I ',ice `��•. ' 'a I i ;°� : I 1 : I : I I •iOl +• :v •,� 1"--'--. _.. t.:. _.:. ,.._-.-!.��s�.v: ,. a-L>_,,, :.. .,!:. .._- -a..•.—_.:.... _- _.:.: K ._..-, a. _—.._:ci_ ___. :.,�: __ .. __ .. _ .-. .r.r_ c�i .-�.. . .;I ...... _.. r _i L' 17 .i'./ 1 �. � • CD,3 ' i lU ` i O I O 1 I zs ze � I ! i O I " ! 1s : I , , r ' i zs . i r- �Z Oi Approximate Test Locations Compaction Map Tract 24890 - Mandarina, La Quinta 20 Southwest Comer of Jefferson Street and Pomclo La Quinta, California f Earth Systems MW Southwest 03/24/08 1 File No.: 10404-02 4ft Earth Systems 1/ Southwest 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203 (760)345-1588 (800)924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 November 29, 2006 File No.: 10404-01 06-11-827 Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 5305. E. Second Street, Suite 204 Long Beach, California 90803 Attention: Ms. Jennifer Toohey Conrad Subject: Bearing Values and Near Source Seismic Coefficients Project: Tract Map 24890-1 Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo La Quinta, California Reference: 1. Buena Engineers, Inc., Soil Engineering Report for La Quinta Lodge, La Quinta, California, Project No.: B-16006-P1, dated February 25, 1986. 2. Earth Systems Southwest, Letter of Geotechnical Engineering Services, for Tract 24890-1, 20 Lot Residential Subdivision, La Quinta, California, File No.: 10404-01, Document No.: 05-12-707, dated December 15, 2005. This letter has been prepared for the proposed residential subdivision to be located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo, in the City of La Quinta, California. We are providing recommendations for bearing capacity and near source seismic criteria in accordance with the California Building Code. Are recommendations are as discussed below. Foundations The proposed residential loads will be supported by conventional continuous and pad footings. The recommendations that follow are based on soils that exhibit "very low" expansion characteristics. Footing design of widths, depths, and reinforcing are the responsibility of the Structural Engineer, considering the structural loading and the geotechnical parameters given in this report. Conventional Spread Foundations: Allowable soil bearing pressures are given below for foundations bearing on recompacted soils. Allowable bearing pressures are net (weight of footing and soil surcharge may be neglected). ➢ Continuous wall foundations, 12-inch minimum width and 12 inches below grade: 1100 psf for dead plus design live loads Allowable increases of 200 psf per each foot of additional footing width and 200 psf for each additional 0.5 foot of footing depth may be used up to a maximum value of 1800 psf. November 29, 2006 2 File No.: 10404-01 06-11-827 ➢ Isolated pad foundations, 2 x 2 foot minimum in plan and 18 inches below grade: 1700 psf for dead plus design live loads Allowable increases of 200 psf per each foot of additional footing width and 250 psf for each additional 0.5 foot of footing depth may be used up to a maximum value of 2000 psf. A one-third (%) increase in the bearing pressure may be used when calculating resistance to wind or seismic loads. The allowable bearing values indicated are based on the anticipated maximum loads stated in this report. If the anticipated loads exceed these values, the geotechnical engineer must reevaluate the -allowable bearing values and the grading requirements. Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction on the base of foundations and by passive resistance of the soils acting on foundation walls. An allowable coefficient of friction of.0.35 of dead load may be used. An allowable passive equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pcf may also be used. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Passive resistance and frictional resistance may be used in combination if the friction coefficient is reduced to 0.23 of dead load forces. A one- third ('/3) increase in the passive pressure may be used when calculating resistance to wind or seismic loads. Lateral passive resistance is based on the assumption that any required backfill adjacent to foundations is properly compacted. Seismic Design Criteria This site is subject to strong ground shaking due to potential fault movements along the San Andreas and San Jacinto Faults. The minimum seismic design should comply with the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC). The CBC provisions are generally intended to protect human life safety and prevent structural collapse. It is not necessarily intended to prevent structural damage or preserve functionality after a large earthquake. Therefore, more stringent seismic design should be considered if a particular level of structural performance is desirable after a large earthquake. That design should be based on a site and project specific seismicity analysis. The following are updated 2001 CBC seismic design values: 2001 CBC Seismic Coefficients for Chapter 16 Seismic Provisions Seismic Zone: 4 Seismic Zone Factor, Z: 0.4 Soil .Profile Type: SD Seismic Source Type: A Distance to Known Seismic Source: 10.2 km = 6.3 miles Near Source Factor, Na: 1.00 Near Source Factor, Nv: 1.19 Seismic Coefficient, Ca: 0.44 = 0.44Na Seismic Coefficient, Cv: 0.76 = 0.64Nv Reference Figure 16-2 Table 16-I Table 16-J Table 16-U (San Andreas Fault) Table 16-5 Table 16-T Table 16-Q Table 16-R The potential for soil liquefaction to occur at this site is considered negligible because the depth of groundwater beneath the site exceeds 50 feet. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST November 29, 2006 Closure File No.: 10404-01 06-11-827 This report is issued with the understanding that the owner, or the owner's representative, has the responsibility to bring the information and recommendations contained herein to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project so that they are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. The owner, or the owner's representative, also has the responsibility to take the necessary steps to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors follow such recommendations. It is further understood that the owner or the owner's representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. As the Geotechnical Engineer of Record for this project, Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) has striven to provide our services in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this locality at this time. No warranty or guarantee is express or implied. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and the Client's authorized agents. This report is based on the assumption that an adequate program of client consultation, construction monitoring, and testing will be performed during the final design and construction phases to check compliance with these recommendations. Maintaining ESSW as the geotechnical consultant from beginning to end of the project will provide continuity of services. The geotechnical engineering firm providing tests and observations shall assume the responsibility of Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Should you have any questions concerning our report please give us a call and we will be pleased to assist you. Sincerely, pFESS EARTH SYS HWEST �f{ V lt.yy•a6 << .z�Q (�I ✓ CE 38234 M m d Exp.03/31/07 Craig S. Hill s�qT CE 38234 ClV1L ��P FOF CAL\C-0� LTR/csh/aj f Distribution: 4/Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 1/RC File 2BD File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST TAHITI PARTNERS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 5305 EAST SECOND STREET, SUITE 204 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90803 REPORT OF TESTING AND OBSERVATIONS PERFORMED DURING GRADING TRACT 24890 — MANDARINA LA QUINTA 20 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND POMELO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA January 29, 2007 0 2007 Earth Systems Southwest Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited without the express written consent of Earth Systems Southwest. File No.: 10404-02 07-01-839 Earth Systems �� Southwest January 29, 2007 Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 5305 East Second Street, Suite 204 Long Beach, California 90803 Attention: Mr. Phil Larsen 79-811B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203 (760)345-1588 (800) 924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 File No.: 10404-02 07-01-839 Subject: Report of Testing and Observations Performed during Grading Project: Tract 24890 — Mandarina, La Quinta 20 Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo La Quinta, California Reference: Earth Systems Southwest, Geotechnical Engineering Services, Tract Map 24890- 1; 20 Lots, West of the Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo, La Quinta, California, File No.:10404-01, Document No.:05-12-707, dated December 15, 2006. Submitted herewith is a report of testing and intermittent observations performed during the grading on the above referenced project. Grading operations were performed by MelCar Construction, using conventional heavy equipment. Testing was performed as per authorization of Mr. Phil Larsen. Test results are presented on the attached test report sheet with their estimated locations plotted on the accompanying drawing. Compaction tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 2922-05, Method A or B; and ASTM D 3017-05 Nuclear Density Test Procedures. The maximum density -optimum moisture were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM D 1557-02, Method A or C. Test results are as follows: Soil Description USCS Brown, Silt with sand, fine to SM medium grained. DISCUSSION: Maximum Density Optimum Moisture 113.0 pcf 13.5% 1. The project is located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo in the City of La Quinta, California. 2. Prior to grading, the site consisted of 20 previously rough graded lots. January 29, 2007 -.2 - File No.: 10404-02 07-01-839 3. The proposed development will consist of 20 single-family homes of wood -frame and stucco construction. 4. The scope of our work was based on the referenced geotechnical engineering services report and on plans and staking by NMS Consulting. 5. The site was cleared of any pre-existing vegetation and pre -watered prior to grading operations. 6. The building pads were over -excavated to a depth of 3 feet below existing grade or and to a distance of 5 feet beyond the perimeter footings. The exposed surface was processed by scarification, moisture conditioning, and re -compaction. 7. Fill materials consisting of previously removed soils were placed in relatively thin lifts and compacted into place. 8. The contractor's work as described below was completed prior to our arrival on -site on the specified dates. ➢ January 18, 2007: The over -excavation of pads 19 and 20 was made. A total of 2 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ January 19, 2007: Over excavation of pads 1 through 12 was made and approximately 1.5 feet of fill had been placed. A total of 12 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ January 22, 2007: Over -excavation of Pads 13 through 18 was made and approximately 1.5 feet of fill had been placed. A total of 8 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ January 23, 2007: Pads 1 through 9 were at finish pad grade. Pads 18 through 20 had been over -excavated and approximately 1.5 feet of fill had been placed. A total of 13 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ January 25, 2007: Over -excavation of Pads 10 through 17 were at finish pad. A total of 9 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. ➢ January 26, 2007: Over -excavation of Pads 18 through 20 were at finish pad. A total of 9 compaction tests were performed to verify compaction. 9. A total of 47 compaction tests were performed. 10. Test results indicate that a minimum. of 90% relative compaction has been obtained within the areas tested. 11. The test locations are approximate and were determined by pacing and sighting from prominent field features. In our work, we have relied on topographic and survey information provided by others. 12. Based upon intermittent observations and testing during the grading operations, from January 18 through January 26, 2007 on this project, it is our opinion that the grading has met the intent of the recommendations of the referenced geotechnical engineering services report, as well as the grading ordinances of the City of La Quinta. 13. Bearing values given in the referenced report remain applicable. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST January 29, 2007 - 3 - File No.: 10404-02 07-01-839 14. The foundation design criteria as outlined in the referenced report still apply. 15. Please refer to the referenced geotechnical engineering report for further information. 16. As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of work with which we agreed to be involved, and performed tests on which together we based our opinion as to whether the work essentially complies with job requirements. 17. With any manufactured product, there are statistical variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of tests used to measure its quality. As compared with other manufactured products, field construction usually presents large statistical variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of test results used to measure its quality. Thus, even with very careful observation and testing, it cannot be said that all parts of the product comply with the job requirements, and the degree of certainty is greater with full-time observation than it is with intermittent observations and testing. Therefore, our opinion based on observing and testing the work means that there is only a statistically -based, reasonable certainty that the work essentially complies with the job requirements. 18. We make no warranty, express or implied, except that our services were performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and location. 19. It is recommended that Earth Systems Southwest (ESSW) be provided the opportunity for a general review of any changes to the final design and/or location of the proposed structures in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted. If ESSW is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. 20. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. It is also the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the necessary steps are taken to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. It is further understood that the owner or his representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. If there are any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contac e. Q�OFE. S16 Respectfully submitted, �Q�� G S. 4'q� EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Reviewed by, c v`_30_67�1� Z5 CE 3&n4LU z Cr- Exp. 03131107 a Phillip D. Clanton Craig S. Hill s9JfioFl �`w��* Supervisory Technician CE 38234 CAL\ Grading/pdc/csh/aj f Distribution: 4/Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 1/RC File 2BD File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS JOB NAME: Tract 24890 - Mandarin, La Quints 20 LOCATION: La Quinta, California FILE NO: 10404-02 REPORT NO: 07-01-839 age l of 2 Test No 1 Date Tested 01/18/07 Description Elevation Grading, Testing, and Observation %Moisture In Place 11.1 Dry Density In Place 109.1 Relative Compaction 96 Maximum Density 113.0 Per Plan Lot 19 3.0 BSG 2 01/18/07 Per Plan Lot 20 3.0 BSG 10.0 104.2 92 113.0 3 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 1 & 2 3.0 BSG 9.2 108.1 96 113.0 4 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 1 & 2 1.5 BSG 9.5 103.2 91 113.0 5 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 3 & 4 3.0 BSG 10.5 106.8 95 113.0 6 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 3 & 4 1.5 BSG 11.0 110.1 97 113.0 7 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 5 & 6 3.0 BSG 11.9 108.1 96 113.0 8 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 5 & 6 1.5 BSG 11.2 104.3 92 113.0 9 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 7 & 8 3.0 BSG 10.3 109.2 97 113.0 10 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 7 & 8 1.5 BSG 8.9 110.6 98 113.0 11 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 9 & 10 3.0 BSG 11.1 108.2 96 113.0 12 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 9 & 10 1.5 BSG 10.4 105.7 94 113.0 13 01/19/07 Per Plan Lots 11 & 12 3.0 BSG 11.5 105.8 94 113.0 14 01/19/07 Per Plan .Lots 11 & 12 1.5 BSG 10.3 111.2 98 113.0 15 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 12 & 13 3.0 BSG 9.3 109.6 97 113.0 16 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 12 & 13 1.5 BSG 7.8 111.3 98 113.0 17 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 14 & 15 3.0 BSG 7.9 110.4 98 113.0 18 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 14 & 15 1.5 BSG 8.3 108.6 96 113.0 19 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 15 & 16 3.0 BSG 11.1 105.9 94 113.0 20 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 15 & 16 1.5 BSG 10.6 109.3 97 113.0 21 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 17 & 18 3.0 BSG 9.1 103.1 91 113.0 22 01/22/07 Per Plan Lots 17 & 18 1.5 BSG 8.5 109.7 97 113.0 23 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 1 FPG 9.3 104.1 92 113.0 24 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 2 FPG 7.8 108.7 96 113.0 25 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 3 FPG 6.4 112.1 99 113.0 26 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 4 FPG 8.2 109.1 97 113.0 27 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 5 FPG 8.8 111.9 99 113.0 28 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 6 FPG 8.0 107.3 95 113.0 29 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 7 FPG 8.5 109.2 97 113.0 30 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 8 FPG 11.9 108.4 96 113.0 31 01/23/07 Per Plan Lot 9 FPG 10.5 111.4 99 113.0 32 01/23/07 Per Plan Lots 18 & 19 3.0 BSG 11.9 105.4 93 113.0 33 01/23/07 Per Plan Lots 18 & 19 1.5 BSG 10.0 106.7 94 113.0 January 29, 2007 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST �qm REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS JOB NAME: Tract 24890 - Mandarin, La Quinta 20 FILE NO: 10404-02 LOCATION: La Quinta, California REPORT NO: 07-01-839 Page 2 of 2 Test No Date Tested Description Elevation %Moisture Dry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density 34 01/23/07 Per Plan Lots 19 & 20 3.0 BSG 12.1 106.3 94 113.0 35 01/23/07 Per Plan Lots 19 & 20 1.5 BSG 11.6 106.1 94 113.0 36 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 10 FPG 8.1 105.4 93 113.0 37 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 11 FPG 7.6 109.6 97 113.0 38 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 12 FPG 7.5 108.3 96 113.0 39 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 13 FPG 9.2 107.7 95 113.0 40 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 14 FPG 10.1 106.4 94 113.0 41 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 15 FPG 8.3 111.3 98 113.0 42 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 15 FPG 6.5 105.3 93 113.0 43 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 16 FPG 7.4 108.6 96 113.0 44 01/25/07 Per Plan Lot 17 FPG 7.9 108.1 96 113.0 45 01/26/07 Per Plan Lot 18 FPG 11.1 109.8 97 113.0 46 01 /26/07 Per Plan Lot 19 FPG 9.6 110.1 97 113.0 47 01 /26/07 Per Plan Lot 20 FPG 10.4 107.3 95 113.0 BSG = Below Subgrade FPG = Finish Pad Grade January 29, 2007 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST O=Approximate Test Locations .s� Earth Systems--.... Southwest 79-811 B Country Club Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92203 (760)345-1588 (800)924-7015 FAX (760) 345-7315 December 15, 2005 Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 5305 East Second Street, Suite 204 Long Beach, California 90803 Attention: Ms. Jennifer Toohey Conrad Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Services Project: Tract Map 24890-1; 20 Lots West of the Southwest Corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo La Quinta, California Dear Ms. Toohey Conrad: File No.: 10404-01 05-12-707 On November 7 and 9, 2005, a representative of our firm performed density tests at the above referenced project. Tests were performed at random locations in accordance with ASTM D 2922-81, Method A or B; and ASTM D 3017-88 Nuclear Density Test Procedure. Tests were performed as, per authorization of Mr. Geoffrey Payne. The referenced 20 lots are located west of the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Pomelo, Tract Map 24800-1, in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. The lots are legally described at Assessors Parcel Numbers (APNs) 776-200-011, -001 through -006, and 776-210- 001 through -014. We understand the lots were graded approximately ten years ago. The site is currently unoccupied land. To aid in assessing the previous grading, we conducted exploration of the near surface soil by means of excavating one test pit on each lot to a depth of about 5 feet, for a total of 20 test pits. The test pits were excavated using a backhoe. The exposed soil profile was observed relative to soil conditions at the site. Representative bulk samples were taken for each soil type encountered. The estimated locations of the tests are presented on the attached plan with their results being summarized on the attached test report sheets. A total of 84 density tests were performed. The maximum density and optimum moisture were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM D 1557-91, Method A. Test results are as follows: Soil Description Brown Silt with Sand, -fine to medium grained USCS Maximum Density Optimum Moisture ML 113.0 pcf 13.5% December 15, 2005 -2- File No.: 10404-01 05-12-707 Soil Description USCS Maximum Density Optimum Moisture Brown Silt with Sand, fine ML 109.0 pcf 14% to medium grained DISCUSSION: . 1. The compaction test results generally indicate that remedial compaction to a depth of about 3 to 5 feet below grade probably occurred during grading of the lots about ten years ago. Most areas indicate compliance to a minimum of 90% relative compaction to a depth of 3 feet to 5 feet below grade. However, there are apparent deficient areas. 2. We recommend over -excavation to 3 feet below grade and recompaction of lots wherever compaction test results are less than 90% relative compaction at a depth of 3 feet below grade or less. These lots include Lots C, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 14 (APN 776-210-001). The recompaction should be verified by testing. 3. Surficial recompaction should be conducted for Lots 3, 6, 7, and 10 to bring soils within 2 feet of subgrade to at least 90% relative compaction. 4. Compaction at 5 feet below grade, while desirable, is not required, and lots having less than 90% relative compaction at 5 feet below grade may be accepted. In all cases, compaction testing should be conducted after precise grading of the subgrade and within footing excavations to verify a minimum of 90% relative compaction. LIMITATIONS The test results summarized in this report present the moisture and density only at the locations and depths tested on the specified dates. The summarized field and laboratory tests were performed in accordance with engineering principles generally accepted at this time and location. No opinion is expressed as to the uniformity of the material or compaction. No guaranty or warranty of the contractor's work is made or implied. The test locations are approximate and were determined by pacing and sighting from prominent field features. In our work, we have relied on topographic and surveying information provided by others. With any manufactured product, there are statistical variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of tests used to measure its quality. As compared with other manufactured products, field construction usually presents large statistical variations in its uniformity and in the accuracy of test results used to measure its quality. Thus, even with very careful observation and testing, it cannot be said that all parts of the product comply with the job requirements, and the degree of certainty is greater with full-time observation and testing than it is with testing only. Therefore, our opinion based on testing the work means that there is only a statistically -based probability that the densities obtained comply with the job requirements. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that this report is submitted to the appropriate governing agencies. EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST -',December 15, 2005 - 3 - File No.: 10404-01 05-12-707 If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST Reviewed by, Hongbin Huo, Ph.D, Shelton L. Stringer Project Engineer GE 2266 ��pFESSI�y�� Compaction/hh/sls/reh `o �. �-•• i . 2. SON )y�F_ Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Location Map Figure 2 — Site and Test Location Map No. 2��s Report of Relative Compactions Sheets `X�. s so o� , Laboratory Testing Results `s> Font.^HN��P •-� Distribution: 4/Tahiti Partners Real Estate Development Corporation 1/RC File 2BD File EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST N, IV, !ailg U 48 24 P Wall 4 rj C�} fi • Id 0 •i—r -P 'I _7 1—j'q Q) `330-- :tt 1, NUE :3T 41 40 O.O.,k) -Mil 110:11" rf (D vo. —it II A VENUid 50 It 1 09 0 i"143: F= ta J� to we ; '0. 11.1 11 ri a IMIP1 *U 4, .......... .11 V1Z , .......... M .Y W Nk. P �n .9 La Q�irltal: 13 0' ON In I f 7 E . . . . . . . . . . f MG) Reference: www.terraserver-usa.com Figure 1 Site Location Map Tract Map 24890-1, 20 Lots SWC Jefferson Street & Pomelo Street 2,000' La Quinta, Riverside County, California Scale: 1 Earth Systems 0 2,000' 4,000- Southwest 12/15/05 1 File No.: 10404-01 I r. r 9, Jos" -AF -1 orb � ..�.-"�._,.•--.+d�►� ti^_.'•.'r .ram f r . i �ID � •,�, r, "i• .+tea w�r•l�`w.`„-�..�",��,� f:.nL= �'�. r�y� J IF Ah 'fir' �� {�fi►�� •�� ,1x4, fl � Image@ 2005 Figure 2 LEGEND Site and Test Location Map K+ Approximate Test Locations Tract Map 24890-1, 20 Lots SWC Jefferson Street & Pomelo Street La Quinta, Riverside County, California 1 Earth Systems I Southwest Not to Scale 12/15/05 1 File No.: 10404-01 REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIOivS JOB NAME: Tract 24800-1 LOCATION: La Quinta, California JOB NO: 10404-01 REPORT NO: 05-12-707 Page 1 of 3 Test No Date Tested Description Elevation %Moisture ry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density House Pads - APN 776-200-011 1 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot C EG 2.3 109 96 113.0 2 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot C 1.0 BEG 4.6 108 96 113.0 3 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot C 3.0 BEG 6.6 91 80* 113.0 4 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot C 5.0 BEG 14.0 103 91 113.0 5 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 EG 2.0 108 96 113.0 6 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 1.0 BEG 8.9 108 96 113.0 7 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 3.0 BEG 7.3 101 89* 113.0 8 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 5.0 BEG 7.9 89 79** 113.0 9 11/07/05 Per Plan ,Lot 2 EG 4.6 109 96 113.0 10 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 2 1.0 BEG 6.4 108 96 113.0 11 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 2 3.0 BEG 10.5 111 98 113.0 12 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 2 5.0 BEG 7.2 103 91 113.0 13 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 3 EG 3.2 111 98 113.0 14 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 3 1.0 BEG 10.6 106 94 113.0 15 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 3 3.0 BEG 11.0 105 93 113.0 16 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 3 5.0 BEG 9.2 102 90 113.0 17 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 4 EG 2.3 118 104 113.0 18 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 4 1.0 BEG 8.7 107 95 113.0 19 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 4 3.0 BEG 10.0 103 91 113.0 20 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 4 5.0 BEG 10.0 103 91 113.0 21 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 5 EG 3.5 112 99 113.0 22 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 5 1.0 BEG 7.7 105 93 113.0 23 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 5 3.0 BEG 5.8 102 90 113.0 24 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 5 5.0 BEG 8.6 109 96 113.0 25 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 6 EG 3.4 111 98 113.0 26 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 6 1.0 BEG 4.4 102 90 113.0 27 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 6 3.0 BEG 3.7 109 96 113.0 28 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 6 5.0 BEG 7.3 103 91 113.0 House Pads - APN 776-210-001 Per Plan Lot 1 EG 29 11/07/05 2.5 113 100 113.0 30 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 1.0 BEG 7.7 112 99 113.0 31 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 3.0 BEG 6.4 103 91 113.0 32 11/07/05 Per Plan Lot 1 5.0 BEG 7.0 107 95 113.0 33 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 2 EG 5.1 103 94 109.0 34 11/09/05 1 Per Plan Lot 2 1.0 BEG 13.2 97 89* 109.0 December 15, 2005 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST R)ErORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIOM JOB NAME: Tract 24800-1 LOCATION: La Quinta, California JOB NO: 10404-01 REPORT NO: 05-12-707 age 2 of 3 Test No Date "Tested Description Elevation %Moisture ry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density 35 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 2 3.0 BEG 14.5 97 89* 109.0 36 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 2 5.0 BEG 12.8 97' 89* 109.0 37 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 3 EG 5.1 108 98 109.0 38 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 3 1.0 BEG 10.3 97 89* 109.0 39 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 3 3.0 BEG 7.6 105 96 109.0 40 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 3 5.0 BEG 16.6 93 85 * * 109.0 41 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 4 EG 3.7 104 95 109.0 42 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 4 1.0 BEG 6.3 96 88* 109.0 43 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 4 3.0 BEG 12.3 96 88* 109.0 44 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 4 5.0 BEG 11.8 101 93 109.0 45 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 5 EG 4.3 103 94 109.0 46 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 5 1.0 BEG 6.3 103 94 109.0 47 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 5 3.0 BEG 8.4 101 93 109.0 48 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 5 5.0 BEG 7.7 96 88** 109.0 49 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 6 EG 5.3 96 88* 109.0 50 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 6 1.0 BEG 11.5 106 97 109.0 51 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 6 3.0 BEG 10.1 104 95 109.0 52 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 6 5.0 BEG 8.8 96 88** 109.0 53 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 7 EG 2.7 95 87* 109.0 54 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 7 1.0 BEG 4.0 99 91 109.0 55 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 7 3.0 BEG 7.8 101 92 109.0 56 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 7 5.0 BEG 8.0 103 94 109.0 57 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 8 EG 4.0 98 90 109.0 58 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 8 1.0 BEG 6.6 101 93 109.0 59 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 8 3.0 BEG 7.7 97 89* 109.0 60 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 8 5.0 BEG 7.1 97 89** 109.0 61 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 9 EG 3.6 101 92 109.0 62 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 9 1.0 BEG 10.7 106 97 109.0 63 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 9 3.0 BEG 13.0 95 87* 109.0 64 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 9 5.0 BEG 7.3 109 100 109.0 65 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 10 EG 3.6 105 96 109.0 66 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 10 1.0 BEG 7.7 96 88* 109.0 67 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 10 3.0 BEG 13.5 99 91 109.0 68 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 10 5.0 BEG 7.8 94 86** 109.0 69 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 11 EG 3.7 103 94 109.0 70 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 11 1.0 BEG 9.7 105 96 109.0 71 11/09/05 Per, Plan Lot 11 3.0 BEG 11.9 93 85* 109.0 72 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 11 5.0 BEG 9.0 91 83** 109.0 December 15, 2005 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST RiN; ORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS JOB NAME: Tract 24800-1 LOCATION: La Quinta, California JOB NO: 10404-01 REPORT NO: 05-12-707 Paee 3 of 3 Test No Date Tested Description Elevation %Moisture Dry Density Relative Maximum In Place In Place Compaction Density 73 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 12 EG 3.4 108 99 109.0 74 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 12 1.0 BEG 9.4 100 92 109.0 . . 75 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 12 3.0 BEG 12.6 99 91 109.0 76 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 12 5.0 BEG 9.8 83 76** 109.0 77 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 13 EG 3.1 107 98 109.0 78 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 13 1.0 BEG 9.0 106 97 109.0 79 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 13 3.0 BEG 8.8 96 88* 109.0 80 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 13 5.0 BEG 6.5 89 82** 109.0 81 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 14 EG 6.1 104 95 109.0 82 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 14 1.0 BEG 8.8 99 91 109.0 83 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 14 3.0 BEG 7.7 92 84* 109.0 84 11/09/05 Per Plan Lot 14 5.0 BEG 7.9 84 77** 109.0 BEG = Below Existing Grade EG = Existing Grade * = Failing Test ** = Below 90% Relative Compaction at depth below probable zone of original grading compaction December 15, 2005 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST File No.: 10404-01 December 15, 2005 Lab Number: 05-0702 MAXIMUM DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D 1557-91 (Modified) Job Name: Tract 24800-1, La Quinta, CA Procedure Used: A Sample ID: 1 Preparation Method: Moist Location: North @ 1-4' Rammer Type: Mechanical Description: Silt (ML) Sieve Size % Retained Maximum Density: 113 pcf 3/4" 0.0 Optimum Moisture: 13.5% 3/8" 0.0 #4 0.0 140 135 130 125 105 100 0 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 Moisture Content, percent 30 35 EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST File No.: 10404-01 December 15, 2005 Lab Number: 05-0702 MAXIMUM DENSITY / OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D 1557-91 (Modified) Job Name: Tract 24800-1, La Quinta, CA Procedure Used: A Sample ID: 2 Preparation Method: Moist Location: South @ 1-4' Rammer Type: Mechanical Description: Silt (ML) Sieve Size % Retained Maximum Density: 109 pcf 3/4" 0.0 Optimum Moisture: 14% 3/8" 0.0 #4 0.0 140 135 81111 125 105 M 95 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Moisture Content, percent EARTH SYSTEMS SOUTHWEST TESTTVO EArGIIVEERS, INC. -August 10,,2605 Alalerials Consulting ,Since 1954 16Z )M(�.dfi' Je'4 IV tki Project N-d. U17-1004 Simpson Test # 2005492-4 6-4,99 2005502-505-5018', ' Page I of IS, MrJere , my.M.rGstrap,,,P.E:,,ManagerofRegcoch & Development Simpson Strong Tie , Company, Inc. I V qng-, _ pany 4.120 Dublin Bfvd. Suite40.6 7) Dublin, CA 94.5,68 Sew SUBJECT: (:�ST�]ffD10;- Out Test in a 64ftCh Wifl, /2-inch End Dis-tance Corner. C6hdifionj Approgimate Concrete Strength, 2707 psi. Dear Mr. Qilstrap: In accordance with, Simpson Strong -Tie Company's request Testing Engineers; Inc. (TEI') witnessed, testing for the, subject test model on August 10, 2005. The. test .§gjmpjp summary, inforimit,ion is presented. in Table A. 'The -.,test -resufts, m Tables B'gind,attadhtd &phs., Photos Itht6ugh 4 depict the lest set-up and typical failive modds. Thc1esfiAg: was C'onducte4jn. the'Tyrell Gilb.'-Relsearch Laboratory located at] 255 Performance Drive;Stockton,,California.'Testing was �tohducttd i6acbordance with TEI QC MaOual,, SOP 1 20.160 arid SOP 2 6. 162. If 'you , have.any questions regarding, this report, or if we,may' b e; of further s er v i. ce' . t 6 you, please contact 'the-und drsign4 'TESTING ENQINEE,9,5-, "INC. I CI Ty OF LA QUIN TA ernan o _oo" BUILDING &SAFETY DEPT. Staff Engineer APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION [DA r 0 13Y Of 9V By 77 ewor-i i., V: _rtre0le-6* tothe i) tik6dj;k4,re*v�,ean b o dueedo��i A, ft ent �e wiless Wriftenperm6slon, from tEl, Is obtained. CWPorate OMCO- - 2811 Teabayd&'Streeit - San Liindro, Caftntal -94577 - (610) 83-5-3 i 42 -fW t5l-Qj BM-3777 ;Jeremy M G!lstrap, P E,, Manager of Research & beve6pment. 'STHD10,- Pull DuI Tes'Ory a,6-inch. Wa11, %nch'End Di stanee.:ComerCoradition; 'bate T. est: August tl.0, 2-005. Table A. Test SampleTData Summary Connector' TEI .T.U17. 004' Simpson Test #2005492-496.499, 200550Z, 05-508 Page 2:of1:8 Measured o How sAm- was: Witnessed.by? Z-vilu�j obtai Model; STHD10 9nforrns_to drngs Ran domly picked byDace.-; Drawing No ;STHDIAIiF ;Rev: HG Verified by TEl 7/27/05 , Simpson -Strong WarehouseJocated.aF.u'=. Connector,.lylatertal: ASTM A653SS GR 33`e atfac}%ed Mill Cent' 498;ksi250490980 'SodthAirportWay,,:Thickness:: Stockton; -_CA, USA; 12 GA (.0 0.99 Min) Measured by TEl Finish:_ .Galvaniied'G90' Not veiYfied by'fiEl' -Fastener Locati6if Quantity &' Measured Measured , Measured or ;How sample was 'TypeY :Diameter:.(in) Length (m;) Utn'essed by< obtained Foundation: - STHD1t) —t - ... , Randomly-pudied by Simpson Strong•Tie'atthe - Frame 1" clam bolt= A325 1 4; asured by TEl Warahouse kicatediat 5�151 South.Ai ort Wa , rP X, �Stockton'u CA USA: Mem beers Member Concrete: Size; Measured. Moisture Measured or Now sample`was, St�engtfi (in) ; - :Content % `Witne§sed tiy` — - :. obtained; _-.. . . Stem waU - L Foundation ; 27.07. psi i Shaped 6` (widifi) : fJlA � Formed by Simpson Strong ..n I x 55:5° (length);x: Frame w :N/A _. Puritaset�ti' Sim son � y p ._ .-Stron '`Tie it Local Su - liev, Test As'ser `.The;test rise '-2 "162: The :concrete was compresstye. performed tip 'slow rate twit hsted'in the.!, was assembled by S mpsoti lab;personnel in:'accor" wd with TEI'41 P 20 160 &. lies were identical The aneltors;were installed as :illustrated mthe attached °tietatl. the .d atid,�consolidated `in accordance wrath ACL recomYnendahons The aveiage concrete.; wa0,707 pst as shown to the°attached concrete compresstue strength test,report soLdate;Engineenng Labs -Oakland The concrete was satripled in accordance=with ACI likes byConso`;ltdate Engineenng)abs The tenston 1'oad,vi+as applied on°STH' D10 at=a I _.,.. H ure The tesYassemtly �s�shown in theattached photos andahe-;fastener: schedule is table: Wall, M SO 'TEST TEST 4010,604 2- o o . �y_ �u-,j/3. �� '� '�-f. ` 19 ham k ro '_�.. ^-`-_-.. -_`' '�--'^'~ ~ - 2 Iferemy-�M Gilstrap, P. I :; Manager b : f Research &:Development 'STHD10 Pu[I Out Tost;in a 6=inch WaH<y ranch Erd Qi Wce.Com& Condlbon,; ;Date oflTest August t0;:2005 Fi 'are 2: Additional lT* ©f T' �t:_$t Up. (S;+T.Hll'•10, metalled �iin Stem `, j, 'TEI No V'l73 004 . Simpson Test#2005492.496, 499 Z005502=505.508: `Page 5 of 18; �eremy;m vusuap, r t., manager of Kesearcn & ueveiopment TEI Nod J17,3 004 `- STND10 PuIltQut Test in a ti�ncfi Wall;'/tench End Qistance Dome bonditio.. iSimpson:Test,#2005492;49&499 200550Z505-508 Date of TestM Aiigust'10,,=2005 Page'6 of 18 .Ft; 'Fig_ 6k 3 ' AdRdihonat Vie ,of Test;Set Up ,�STADl'0 installed for`Teshngj: -Jeremy,XGilstr.ap*,.P.E,.. Manager of Restardh'ADMlopm6nt "TEM&`01 711'004 Sinioid-te Tafk6b54,92*496,499 I, *Fgure4: Typical1�'�{' of Test Failure F E„ Manager of Research ..'lopmOnt Pull Nn6h"to bistirt*CorhOr.Coftb6h, :Date of Test gy0I".d "A05- Section q:-A, T El 46:-Ull-S."04 ;Simpson Testy#2005492�49fi-499 200,55,924*548, Page 8 of 18 - �,icfhl — 'i S-ert F C' It-uc.tiQnj Det aif& ;Jeremy M Gdstrap, P E ;;Manager of Research &>Developmeni TEI No: U1.,7&004• ' STHD10r RUII Out Test m a 6-inchlWall, lrinch• End Distance Comer Condition;] Simpson Test;#2005492-a96,a99: -: �- :Date of'Test August 10;-20Q5 ;�2005502505-508, P4ge:10' of?18> r, --ti55'Pa5CO YNiJSiRZfS !¢TALW[i�ICA1, TEST REPD3tT' 5It,... ... :, ._ _. .. P;,.tBER OS730-)tlfE,(S[:D)_ 142L4 ORDER NIAiHER'NS39383= TgILY ?Ft312S,$: VFNXGLE ; RQ$ itT AB IAR `TRiiCICIiiG ;SHIP Op7E 06414005. .. _ SOIA FTO. , 799395SY 038 PINMR. - S.DdOPSdii SiRWfG-� ao INc • - S�iPsQ� S'IitRxres' T_ZE c0 ilNc'. - . INTEJtN14TI�}FfAI ,4SiOi,ITRE•IIRii/E/GAPAf�fIG x p o soXr�1558 - _ z8�s�w►v�. RQAD . . sM Tt.E,1t8lRo, cA saSTl: STGKTIDN, U 9.5.215 9324': PREPAREDi8Y THE OFFIC F OF.: QN. ut�d bV 1�nai 40 , llbPE•Z QgTE SOS-31 200:5 vac c,cvAIzo ,SHEETS,AST#A A653-04A ssl cw 33; - �cu>AR Y IP 4R AT; l IG4�T ox�.112;sm ItLa, .GAit6E'T LLERANt� _ ' t368S IiIM 8A5F- iiE 4 `THIG�tliEss, . E)OMESTIC=;S'T�EL� OHI:Y:• : , . 96 ERZAL- DESK, NEAT NEST YIEPT IUSI E F -M X 17Et li1iCKNE55' WIDTH' NENIBER,pxECE )3;QO0pSY 4S;MPSI l_.2 ZN, ,BEND NRB' _ `M2Q3i1: �41;'00 05" :©70O tQii'X'48:0440. :023887'0405Et 53.800 35 OK, 0415EC. 4R.1 1i4, "0 38 NEAT ;:C IQ,i P" S Si- _CU, Nx •CR:' � AL- N, v !d$ TI. " . ... . ., . . . 0?3$87. :.082 :39 ..010 .0 6` :01.3 . iO3 AT .04 .J 0 039:.003` .001: 001- . Figure li.-M f! Q:ertificate: p4trap,P..E.,, ManagerofRes.earc.h&DOvelopment, '4THjp10_ -Pull DutTest in as inch Wall, ch End Distance baiteqf.foit! gust l Qj 2005 TEI No- U173:004 Simpson TOst , #2005492496-499' 2005502,50540t Page ifoult I . CE", FIED TEST REPORT, Ave. will, MY go SrmnON SUOING-TMCOWAM-MIC. w SIMV3WSM0WG-nE'CQW4NY, IN /0_.p M C C C, A" n, W" 'STDOCM rSTt RAILROAD SATq1XV61tO 'CA, �94577 o EASTst6da' CA MARK ALL DOOA4DM WnM P.O. #05740-S= Lmnft. UN9AL SOCYrAGE FORSAMCOIL UM BE 'MIST HAKMS ewo CQILVRTM15 ASTM-A.-dS1*%41SLdR.3 I Y wagnai -T 71 7 I CERTIFY THE FPUDW, NG jQ,*0004 C011L w9ll Irr twofamrowro sE, KIN 'SE I S079S4 9f C64W4SD 'OF THE M111-f SFANbLEV CT f 'UTf,b,IL I? S."T MIWIMQVSIVI_�� f A L X �U=M_m z!A pip q: CkU - RAM' 'RE' - 12: %&As c c V"s C.. 11BDlow 4V IT TXF C: Mn 41 00 1% A !tb In .14 Ole c"I 9" TOW002 MZ is. .16 GK Gi m cis: ct3 am 1'�a Q 01 C04 01 ac� f 0 0,41. . I J *1 1 1. 4 '1 .1 1 1, . Figure 8 MALCer-fiit cafe. p.fe, ` 20055.0240-409 Ni ~ kaulffaw ' qsearch&.'Qeyolopmeqt a in l Yi- cIEnd, Distance . Comes Date of Te`st�August 10,2005 4200 8000" 7.000. "00 Mel 40 60 i80 !fdo tio. 1ias4pp><rea goad MR5 :Simpson Test #2005492 496 T.El.No.U171304. . 4,99 -i;i 54i' a§etbfRe-karch,.&.Developmpfit, TEI Nd.-01,73 004. fidh'� r er n.. #g"'y I-, �, - -._ liffi0on -Tett'#20054924964--99 04 0End' Mance,Qoq., 0 20055.02405466 Date of T Page 16 -6f'18 x-Igure 00 of'Test August 1,0 2005 ATM TdR�fP: F3[.�i1ic GO M- `TEI No ;U173 U04 Simpson Test #2005492.496-499 =2�005502"505-508: :Page:17 of�18S ACC4 6P_iiiFilf]�+a;iai;•,'�;6 •S1�•x3k'-:9tEti4�,�dh 8 8 fiEp- lip �Q aye ��io l�AR„*�3. 6T� et.p�UP�0 1 '. ' Figure 14 Con_crete Compression Test Report Oiisiap, P:E, 'Manger Research; esearch bevelopmert TEI N' a-.'Ul'73'-'004* R STHD-bnigrtop4ifion, -,,iO NOtT a! -inc VVOI,nch"Ervd Di$,WC*. ;Simpson Teft#266�624N:U§ e#in_ .6 08 ,Db4e,6f-Uit,Auciusf-!b-' P2 je I fa 'LA331f:- mom O�c�i* ASMM m, Von 9oe: IhgA ---------- =saw kW4y[p: Tcn. �FfltcivL p 3 ;L U, IAI �wv SU W-WXLT- mm.4mmcw- 1--5-'Cbi0f*t6 CDPrm6h. Tes Ak di--Coptinu CA k Pk- Ask AtWmnce-%rvI&es PC P"t Si�tP IF l SON STRI ONGM ECOVV A 'jl7 ummen, 'R PW4:4 i oaf IQOI NO r.e t'samAes.-tested %vtre r r • •�` �i `itifi 2tY. i fa .e?;l•S'�' ' �.v ' Y•L J� � � W +Y{},S. Fri ;.'+ If�OU��,��l�+ t�tp�S{t�itCi�dtl . p(base,c�rnacat�tt3�Fttj��e�gt�ed� �... i r ' S t { tTE�6{3#�1S�ta�N' Ca;�1�G��;E�RS � i M •p/�Npp 1 ' K ' Y i ICI j1� I� Y t a• TEVS_ H.. li: tic YJ34-'2 yY � ,Irk �'} i�1• ..x. NY +y -� d 1 fox 345$8.V4ply $• 771, i � +#tQ{�s cam, "t•. r.—. �� w.••• --. •}i'�•' �Y•"� �IAati ai'M+i�a•W,�... 'J►/•��Q�p� �{� 4 � !l' �� A. Kf.i «♦♦y+n �`-�d. '4' , � > ��jj Flbwsv. .� � Mse^,�'�I�M•��T Y�2�� •Y -Yi '4�^' TT ` �i � �� b� �� ( �l ,cam x �,�.,. _ - • -- i-� .-' �� .,>� -v+�:�.�k" tee.,--.'6^' ' ?:1 "�� 1 . w • _ - v 3 ! 1 i i1j • � - 4 � i f a......a:.. _ t X g 4tt •" ..�yy... vJ4 A"R.ww.�.w �� .. -.ayN - 1 f.-..�-r-`.'r'.ww�"�.-,3"�•+1;+.'w w. .w �.twr�w, �yryp..44�..�;o.�.� �� as w jj•? • Y r T R •.�V'C• ,i�i:..V ;�Vy� ayy��(}y9 xiSiAy 71C. � a '-_ ""-._' � y ' �.�Q9 �, ',�'Y'. +tom S}' ±h1 •mob''` L 7+' ✓A t 1 •, 1 a w► ,,....._..� ,.;��_ �� .�s /r��'►;'�j/p��'��{r�-�.j�-�YYeP•+�r��Y�� Jf l V -/ • 0..•••ym.�yy 'i• t'[ •+"' - NL' .. �a �mC t � F � � � �11 � 'ii�J � III � iI ��'�� ' =. t - _... '�i ,+ Y F .. Si' �♦ i .. « 7. F '"+e:-:.+.it �' w i i'+,i 9.,5 � ' 1}� ltf-� IV � z' rrr•., ,f--'=-y:..r ��. .� - -s yY. i � �.. � `-.d•� Y j, „ s..�, t� tlAt� 1 # `..•.......�..:.... ` € � .�...s s y `�� _H4 � � Y .��;Ti t f tAi :hR T vt •.,��,. !'u a%m •: .`ter ,�'e rt..v:.�.�,P.mn-��I r,�"��'a: r,�av �rr v �'�+M1 p� tt_f�-_ � •� . i .r..•�' .' r 'tr2v-+.s ++.•mFs� :nc• ri.2� r.r �.,.�,.rF {{ E ? ' F: ; .•-r -..: �� t '•yam yr.1�T• r+s i,F M s+r.rn�. � �i�:; '�[ _ �' 3 �' ",,��„%'.wes.F�r� :m. r t. "-� r- '.+�vm.-..s1_. 4 x.� a-�+F+e....:...�....F......'-"Mn... •sus r 3.t li t • + , .: t t ` +t � w, s _'• �. .+,,, S ... � _...'Y� 4 r { � Y: �# T-:r`Mi'� ��"�` � �'Z��. (f • � r: x ,F " ,+.•. � f -� x �-y-,... .ram � �4r- � o.• 'v w...a- f�1 +� � � �� F : �Flv . .. .f- +.. � t .+.; a °;"`�M yyr""'��',S •,'•,� yy -+.,.�zt*y$"t#Za"��rt v c,_' r�.� �,� ,.`[Y b ' a!__- _ _ - ..'.:r_.e.-�.-r-�.'.w-.�+.. .:��+i".»i.. ;E•r�f.. 't,A .1.sr, # >�—�" �u �'irs.�r'.�K`'y_- w';'+"'.w.r "� {' -00 PAW z R Aa(► "P -�J4 7 z O01ARiRI MC °P-ATW ISiAI2 r Ci3k0�1 ►3 pECTm 0770,5 "06 at PcF- sa1�1b� ��fO0t�®� 8 ttof: At3 :41s ozcaa s 1 3 All - at, ohr�uat !err RHfNA r PZvTs, „.'�'S5'd' D% N tC �.k3� .6 1i`�3 . Say 1d'= 3 s Ur4 m j��:��/�/��\��\��k�� Jf ,PHOT.' t/c/ S o .7s_ fluke Sifi&& 19�4 'N TE-lPr"9J!KP�" "-'t.UA' 3", o2, 200534046,2005345; Mr .Jeremy Cnlstrap, PM AU; 9SrofEngineering S ,4120)?6blifi"Blv'd 94568 On. &ap-., In accordance v►tfi T" Testing imps' -�l og s request T s(model on 07JOV2 & Thb f0tff;&Egummanzeafin: T261eT, ox-attached gr testhsct-up :and J.: ailWt.-modd§,.-, ele'stin, - 'd 'ted"in' e. -'' "G -boratory'A' STtho 9-0 dtAit, T , k "!Z94omia.-Te . sung-wm"cOnductedih aiewid . Wo t S61 Tf you ;have any queshons_regardmgtti's report, or if we may be of fu :the wid , . 1 "TESTING tRGIN9h f 6, firnatido n- 9-figlkeelr Corporate Office 2811 1_ . ePgaron.-.Stn Cl n �ffgineieirsj Inc. �TEI witnessed Mary irif4o-"tl,h"*A'ti,p,,n, ilsprpse!ated..iia ohs. Photos I through 5'depct the` ,nv,e therservice qo yo.u, please_ contact: u• /,v Mr Jeremy Gilstrap, Manager of fngineenng STHDU4 NO Out Test in;a 6-�ncti:Wall, %2 inch End Distance; _ . —. late "of `Test• July 1, 2005 ~Table A Test Sample D. a,�, Um . ary: :Conner#or ' /TEI No a T1002'. Simpson Test #-2005340;to 200534S Page 2 of .191; MeasuredFS Mena ured or ;How sarriple:was` Value'?:Witnessed by obW ed 'Model: STHD.14-. ot Sampled byiTEl. - -- - - .. Randomlypidced byDate DrawingNo STHD14>+F Rev F .. z. 1/24105 Sim `s'on S Tie ofp �Connector Warehouse located at 5151' .Material.; ASTM,Ati53'SS".GR ' G Fy�a 432 ksittached Mdl Certificate; . IdS3.9381,_. ; Stockton�C•AUSAG9Mm) - � 01Measured,by TO . -. :Fm�sh.: Galvanized G9U Not verified by;mt; R Fasfene;r= f Location Quanwty ,Measured Measured'. Measuredvt ;How sam le was P - - Type. Diameter, (h) L`etigth (m.j ' �'Wdrtessed by- obtained' Foundation STHD1.4 - _ ._Randomly eicked by . impson ng-Teat the; Frame;, 1" drain bolt. Fi325; 1 4, Measured by:TEl Warehouse ocated at 5151, South Ai , rt Wa , !PQ y~ '.USA* Members Member Species ands ;.,. Size> ,Measured'. - - Moisture , MotsturKdfitent > >�- .. How sample was. rGcade. in ( ) , Content °� : MeasP. __Py ob#a' ;. — -- - - Stem Wall L shape- Foundation' 2480- si P Ei wntlth z55 5 Men th x ) (, g, ). : tdlA Not measured by TEI ,Formed by Simpson Strong: ,( 36° fief "lit erl ` 1 Tie Co; dnc � �� NIA, ,Purchased by;S,mpson Stron =Tie at,Local Su lies: TesCAssernbl-- The tes assembly was^assembled by Simpson ab,personnei' identical 1'he;anchors were nstalted as it ustrate f in the m w.`ith TEIY9.bKb-16,0, The samples were he:concrete was�placedan, corisohdated to accordance with ACI recommendations The average concrete corripreslive strength was pig_ shown iri the attached concrete compresswe strength test report performed I. by`Conso�tdate Errgineeringl,abs Oakland THe concrete was,aampled in accordanee.w�th ACI, and ASTIR gwdehne5 by_Consolidate Engineering Labs: The feris�on load was applied on STHDl4 at a slow rate until failure The'test assembly a shown to fire attached photos and the fastenei sche(Uels;listed in,the above, table.,r p,. nage'r.,cif�&gil"nng Mr i. Jeremy G i I W'a'a Manager ncKwilr�.Y D.Abffe� �JUI T- k "Y'l ..!m on, t ;Date;of Test 005" TAW S� Test Data TEI','N6. U-17-3,00T Si`mPson Test ' 2005*,to 200,5345 TEST TOT. JES ;kQQ5342 IJL.' T OW(W 4 A 11 5.0.06` `FAILURE' ODE -,Stfio ww gii. pre:, P;tore LOAD -TEST-. TEST I-TES-T. #2005.U3' 1 1#2005::"-- 4206345 ULTIMATELOAD` 14322 .15654, 639.9 fAILIUREM—Obt Cbhcf6 il' ure=.'. sh6ar- Strap Concrete-Ipjlotq�oh64 he, . X. ,ALLOWABLE STRESS —Safety Average i6-ad 'Test'-P' Test Maehme pad.t fl,. ,.Lyoad,ftW. Measunng ev! TEI-Witnes :Other I Miffi-l- J. esi( toot Limit lbi 5,024 -1,O,PO73 E. .1 SQP-"20.160 Steel frarne.: "il, 90-59,0C. 6i" 6w /2 f0tde 1- "-61C'9dn' J 4 �' - � - a'l-A � �7 Sli5w"faW 'N A, Fernando ...9.,. 44Ag StdSST (SST), -�bTiy r',(SST1)j�..:K'Downs. Mr �jerep Gilsttap, Manages of F:Ogineenng TEI No U173 002 STH�1 wPuli Out.Tesf in a fi inch Wall, %-tnctt EA istance., Simpson Test # 2005340 Co 2005345. �1b_ Date of Test July1, 200 Page 4 of 1;9 Mt Jeremy Gilstrap Manager �f Englneenno Sl HD14:Pull Out Test in "a 6-��ufi Wall, /Aft End Distance.; Date of"Test July'1, 2005;' i ,TEI No V 002 Simpson Testy 2005340 to 2005345 �b Page 5';of 19 1. " f. Mr Jeremy Gilstrap, Mariager+of Engineenrig `1 EI No U173 002 �STHD14-;Pull Out Test m a 6-i c, Wall, %nch E Distance. Simpson Test_# 2005340•to 2005345. L �6 t)ateoftTest Ju1y,1,2005 „Page. 19: y� �T x r� C ;� Eiiyy gyp• "S10. �4. V ~ ,Y? � r +' _y.,nl :,V ".+6y�r $ .. ;fC9i - j ;- a•n 3• hy, y t f s4. g+[u x 3 7 •. � , dF �, "J.; � .% �f f � MF.�r 4 � _ : / �.ji �.,�"ti'•'Ft �. �r�� ire � ! ~ t ' .4 •#ve u'd�.1 � i'L . -� IN 1 r Ph�oxo{ 3; View rof Test Set Ups - _.!.dc��tional: (ST�iDY4 installed for Testing 4 Mr Jeremy Gilsttap, Manger of Erigineenng ST'HD1�4-ri�Il OutTest in;36�nch lNall �'�_r_ inch End�Distance t)ate of Test Jury 1 2005' :�hoto4; Typical Vew:.of Test Failure, Otrgp tore)°: TEI No 1f173 002 Simpson Testa �0053`_40 to 2005345) 6- Page �T of 19` J r `Mr Jeremy Giistrap, Manages of Engineering TEI No U173 002; sSTNf)14'Pull Out;Test in a 6anch Wali `'lrinsh Erid_Distance: +S mgsan Test # 2005' 6 to,26 55 6 1:767 :Date ofTesf fuly'4, 2005' V Page 8of'19; a &j - '• -� v � i �Y .� � s��," � it .:� �K7} ', : � ' t, o-.R €Y 4f�lt df Cl�. ' ,.. {fi cif `• � r��4. � C �y. - t L is o •,, s r 3 ��.•' t—., . ,.' • .. r . ��. i �'"� � t.--* " • r � r � - �- "�:_ jfit.: { y 14 �q' a 6 � " . } "•� t } r"'4 f t sr' �]� _ f [ w1 h f s F ~ x I 7 ki Fry' }1 Ptioto § A®otl>aer V><ew=`of'Test Failurel QS��.43_.3»d,A66." 5=.c6ttir*t atiear:cone Mr. ArethyfGilstra Mjnager,qf,Ehgpsenpg khthd:b ince.. TEFN6, U171*00Z, ps,on, Teti' 345 I Mr Jeremy ImFmV--;Gils �'flpy . - Manager",:. -, - , .000mg d-b 6 inch Wall, /rinch tr�-,: -.iiWm .-I!" 16 0 50, 11, 02' #.SjinRs n , Page ` -:J, ^ Mr Jeremy sopi *qqg(F of " ", .STHDl4-'?ulOut End M.tanoe.. :�w 0 to,2 .4Q5 Page AU lrl*psl;. Grapai 3" 'Test Mr ,feremy Giistrap, Manager of THD14'-- Pull Out PON -1. '.,Yrinck. Di Wnce.. siemti dw,r NttarWe 43; ;-fb"Nd U.1,73 402', Simpson Test'# 2005.340Uto-�'-20U534 m r M '—E :- Jeremy j stta.,., Manager Engineering k-TH p S W- ull'Out" Test � 6-4 qkka#,� Mrinch ad Distance; 4.� -- 9 -j- �— - 105-344 1STf D14 064'0s nco �T� :Sknp n*Tqst#."2005340 t6,'2005345- TOO. 120., 5'Tesf # 2005344 U&I ON 4 , 4: I I (O.y. qt#.4p,Manager of K Jpfe STHD14 Pull Wfli4in ��: - ., $qnce-� -205445'. 4,vd".-,.,e. Sion- &dbirl TEI No Uit 'Page 16;of19 A '1,4D AO� Tim. , "lq% Graph 6 Test: #2 tiiir Jeremy GilsUap, Manager of Engineering E I STHW nd'P: tes :Date of Test July 1, 2005 Page 1Z:;ofAd, '06h4i "t�t T .2 *2 vs-5--posco 05 -0.300E 73 - 00) 10 Rft0T:A:OOiA_ T-R X ' 038 5TR0KG �-`ftE� cii INC POLUTIL -C V PA a-flit.1 "MxftWj C' 94577' !t-A PREPARED �.. 1 1— OF' - OP Z. DATE 'OS 31 20b3 T;)IX-' 15�-'5.426`7 SPEC `33- * ktGUA, SEAL LE,_ 490--.�N�I MAT- LIGHT "i 4,69's kwBASETAL T@i DO9iE5fxC 'STEEL. ONLY- OA END URB IDENT nr 45-, , MIN: i4_ 3887`040k.C�. :OS -.02 '4 K.; 0 E,_Mo k" .No' .38 6k 'NEAT & Si 7, T 021 '039 -X ., 5 ,roo .001, OWS 013 ".:03 4fulr Jeremy G�Istrap, Manager of Engmeenng 'STHD#14-,Pull Out Test in a G-inch Wali, ch End Distant®:; Date of Test July'1, 2005 _ 1 n'. 'fEI,No U173U023 Simpson Test#'20Q5340 io`2Q05345 P8ge.180,19 r Carisonat+eaew: 53!►23..1�4!"'A QakCA 946D6- ohd5�4bF36- Z699'_ i l I 4 6 0 W. 40rerq.,G14fipj Mangg6r.-o'f,Eng"rneen"ng 'STH014 Pull UtTdstina'64hchVY MY 0'" ' ` * �Il; 0- - * r.�6ch Cfat6-.o-f TestEJu'ly"l,'-?O'Qr,--, ft *100 983.6549, TO No.. U171002 `SJM,pW.h Test l'206. Olo,2bQ5345 Page 19 of Ma „firL 'K 77 CCMF4 �ma coed i,i w UT ci uj PrOn sfPLE TEST OATA FOr QMI m isse -.9nly) Days :to I-fr-s: j-flj(;S, 7;zF AM Fl 3� ; `, J ,. , fa 2 ''d 1 -7 fc-7 7T�7 Engineers, - :Inc. , .A 010 1. 1- 10 19906. ,,SD", STR 1E C INC. POG! I.PWAWs INC. 4637'Chbot"DOT.Sutte 200 'Pleasanton,,, CA 94586 ,ATTN.-. Cregglummots Engineer-;. Manager o'flesdog, ,duiliiy, Assurance Services V06fldl's _06risAn . iOpe 1954. WORK ROQUESTA - 960- 02.072 .. SUBJECT; Simpson Strong Tie STHD 4.Afic"Wr with f":Slot .,and Edge Curlto -2.5/8!', Width. Pull Out Tests S" °Wall, 23 Dinance., �6dl' End -Cover): AoOkbXjMS Co S-J- 700 3" NOF, me.. SUm In accordance,otth your request we have :Whgsto . the tests Aescribed iftiow- On- 'TESTPURPOSE To ditermint-theU10014be pullout 1;6"ad tTib� I' I'a..fi'ftf,Wh-eh, .r, ttilled-ni7-40-b7s7 ,cQnoetes4m010� will. - TEST SAWLES' The-samplis tested wee4 confonrance with file STHD-1 40rodukfth drawingACh"ed PROCEWE.- Th '$a''m PH test—ed were , 00#01,.'The --ancho rs ",were -installed -asJlld#,j*tOd 16the _ bid .Ioad.;.test,sch-enadt, The concrete was placed.and-consolidated inatordate vtdi Ad recommendations. 'Me;COkMeWASsi p edaccording4nd,te n,cb pmston t6ASTM ' :Standards. The "tests ",were '--..--W 1740'psl'(s66.,the:en�tos�c.Icopiissfo�,test report.;') Each assembly -was set, p,<asshown-,�'o-n'the3Iciadrtest.-sthtmadc-,* Load ''wa,s,:,!,a-p,-,p-ilitd,,a"ta-sibw, jWuhitif bililit SO Mo*, men'b -6- A 2 thed. Corporate Office drift 95.131, ftn_inpDflive�, SuIWE-Sim -TAk(408) 461-2425, Amptd. Dmo,.Rdy.4MMtiez '7000,; FM 9) -S"SONSTRONG-TIE COMPANY IJNC. Gregg _. Summers 6ge"Two. 19'sum The results d on the enclosed"ti-b WOW REQUES-TV-0:46002.071 If you have any fie of f .e arp.,n x wem4y: WN 4 ;you Release contact thg,. "TE[,'CO.N_'SULTR-.G , CONSULTING N, 220'f .32..;,Expi d -oI 1 4 sure,V rSIM°PSON; TEST #: %TESTT SPECIMEN "STHD :1.4. WLTH END '.DISTANCE STEM WALL ,S_IMULATOR .CONCRETE' COMPRESSIVIE STRENGTH 1,740 :1:4"' CONCRETE EMBEDMENT TEST 'N0 � 1; TABLE' . DATE O,F "TES.T " ;SLOT. ;EDGE CURL .TO: 22 &/&" MIDTH., 8" WALL., :23-:,l MATERIAL: ::2 GA O:�A-99:' SRAM .Y. TEST 140'.:2Z, `ULTIMATE'.; � ,8�700 _ ,8:68Qy 88O�Q KIND, OF FAILURE ;' iTl re Strap, ;Tore :Strap Tore Strap,. _ Lowest Ultimate 8:680#______, x2/35787#. Average Ultimate::'"'8.727-4- x2 - 17453"#. Witnesses Present {Dai d Huerta, Gregg- `Summers' ands John Br�Yshears' Load �Ce l l : 4'i 097 5`.k Co MPUTMIONS No OF„-- SHEETS S�MPSON ,,TRONGMW OMPWq lft., _ Workf's �nGo_Eq Souatu lconnectotcompW ; Stro4637 Chabot Dnve • Suite '00 Pleasanton, California,04588-2749 IRS Telephone: 1%800Y999` 5059 Fax 5 UM47 DATE:; PROJECT ST iI A4 X N BY CHK.; SUBJECT Q_M au r "P'S�l t t _ . i i .. _ is - - `� ,a�. •.:. ,,,,. ., E ; ) e ji 7r Ail,>> :• is f1 t c, -. j>> • E F S ' r. f .01fahly Assurance SerVices 'Moterialit Considfing Testing Ehlin#trs, 1111t COMPRESSION TEST REPORT WORK REQUEST.NUMBER 2.1983 CLIENT-SI14950 SAMPLE NUMBER 121217 PROJECT NUMBER2198,3 PROJECT -NAME .SI , MPSON STRONG TIE -.PA TST 14.5,0 DOOLITTLE DR-,/S,iLEAN S DATE 4 /0.9 A 6 TYPE OF SAMPLE REG. CONCRETE; OATINI: X-M 00LONIAS SqPPLIER,(CONCRET-E) RF4C LOi4ESTAk SPECIMENS "P M4 8'Y'TONY WOOQAECK- TEI MIX NUMBER 26 f WITNESSED W, DATE SAMPLED 02/16/96 TICKET NO31306413 n' mE,SAMPLED' a -40° PM ,.OAft RECEIVED, 0-2/27/96 LOCATION iWSpqCU RE 1 1/211 FRESH UNrrVVGT.PCF- AIR -TEMIPEAATURE 'F 53 MIXTURE TEMPERATURE 0 `AIR.CON'TEN't -OA: DATE TESTED 10 NUMBER .03'/05/9-6, 153A 03/11/9,6 1,53E 03/-18�96 1153 C .03 ' - /25� /9'6, i 5.1-D 153 E! 04/0.8/96 153F MARK SPECIMEN DIMENSION. - ;6 X12 0-JfTt*$' '29.1 0 ULTIMM LOA 0. Ift 29000 35.000 42000 44000 52060 48000 ULWATESTR., psf '1040 '1250 i500 1r5'70 it 6 0 lilo AVERAGE Sim., psi dW- A,Gt'TtSrE0. DA'YS, .8 14 21 28 42 412 DRY UNIT WIDOW. pd, 5"W03!R8!M. od, '2000 2000' 2006 L '2 0 0-" 0 2000 2000' [SPECIMENS NOTSCHEDULED FOR'TESTINGWILLBE D19CARIJEDAFTER28 DAYS OLD REMARKS:SAMPLES TESTED 'IN AcdoRbANCt WITH ASTM` C-3-0-0 ,CC: 02 -SlfjR$ON',STRONG- TIE 01- JAY. b0iRS"T -YOLTRO� F-. DAVIS CONCRETE -i�kB SLTERVI ' SOR 2811 . Aclifine'SuLe6t, P.O.'Bok 24.07.5 OaldaM'Cafifbrhiia 94623 -*.(510) 835-3142- :QuqljO Assurance Services Mote '01i Consulrrrig TO#Inj Engine Testing Engineers, , . mrs.,'Inc; COMPRESSION TEST REPORT WORK REQUESTAUMBER ]219,03 CLIENTpmSIM85.0-r ;SAMPLE NUMBER 71214,1,,._ PROJECT NUMBER `0 -4/6-4 _.21983 /9,6: PROJECT NAME! RE TY�P�EPF $"LE G-'. CONCRETE "SIM-PSON .-STRONG 'TIE -PA. 'TST 1450 W.OLITTLR',-M - S- :SUPPLIER.,iCONCRIE * , M. , JRMC, LONESTAR M,IVNU.MB*.f;! TICKET N0-:3230643 LOCATION -AN_STRUCTURE I 'W X. X.- COLONIAS. 6ATE,SAMPLECY '02./.26/"",9,6 TIME `SAMPLED I z.40 'P M DATE -AECERVE6 .0.2/27156 of �w kO'� 3 u '1%21 t,.R*SH:l V IT,,'W,I. P__CF=. AIR TEM"FbkAfiQRt, 'O "5-1 MIXTURE E_" PERAt OF, :': 67' 'AIR COkTENT4b. . 0.. + At-,! I TESTED 64/08Z9 , 6 53GL i". k "S b`PECI �N P!MPOSIOIN.Jlnclees 6X12. Uat-MAmLdka;6i. �UdWikTtSTA"p- AdE DAIS 42 WNW upm,"Rm"Jowl 200.0 I SPECIMENS.,,NC)T'gCHEOULED,'FOR'— TES'Tl?tG4',,WILL tE, DISCARDED -AFTERA DAYSDLO AqEMISAMPLES, TESTED IN ACCORDANCE. 02 SIMPSON STRONG , 7TE D ,01 J-AY.-,' ORST 0)EVwv E-E)AW YOUNG - bxvlllg� CON 4k4jto' -9UV,tRVI-80R-, 2811 -J'AddineSvot 5314 PHOTO_ : =A view ;of tote :-test satrap:; 4 V PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Casita Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 1811112010 Date Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 280 Addition n/a # of Stories 1 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST El Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (ft) Features see Part 2 of 5 Status Wall Wood Framed it 1 R-15 3 New Roof Wood Framed Alis ITN OF 2 Radiant Barrier New Slab Unheated Slab-o -Gr e 2 Perim = 68' New CONSTRUCTIONILDING OR 1 ID FENESTRATION Exterior Orientation Area(fe) ; Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Front (N) 8.0 0.350 0.32 1.0 none Bug Screen New Rear(S) a,,q 39.0 _ 0.350yw4.., 0.:32.;-Honey none .Bug;Screenppik.., New g (l� •- 15.0 y} rf�* 0.350': `0.3+p2 ' �10{j J$ r `> none' '¢y};:Bug Screi}en v' Yi New F4x,f...'- .�.<. � � Fir +�A• a +�wF • !-�5+�/�1f 71`r.r".' i "�-`'�.:. �-� A F{{M}S(y,1�3'/FyTi �+��-�'_' �T' �'�� H.. _tr it il- 'Fd,IR ..1` #.� 'A�•` �i —'.—� AUG 2 3 2010 d HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status 1 Split Heat Pump 10.55 HSPF Split Heat Pump 2 1. 0 SEER Setback New HVAC DISTRIBUTION Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status casita Ductless / with Fan Ductless n/a n/a New WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status 1 Small Gas 40 0.62 No Pipe Insulation New Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:5 ID: Page 1 of 5 Reg: 210-N0012951A-000000000-0000 "Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:53:26 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 2 of 5) - CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Casita ; Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 SPECIAL FEATURES INSPECTION CHECKLIST The enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Compliance for all orientations is specified, see section 151 (c) 2 of the Standards and section RA 1-3.3 in Appendix RA-1 of the Residential Compliance Manual. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic includes credit for a Radiant Barrier that is Continuous meeting eligibility and installation criteria as specified in Residential Appendix RA4.2.2. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Concrete Tile (10 #/so Roofing requires verification. i� 507.a/111151!7l HERS�REQUIRED VERIFICATION T Items in this section,requlre-field testing and/or verification; by.a certrfied'NERS Rater. Tahe•mspector{must receive a completed CF-4R form for each of the measures listed below for final to be given. The Cooling System Fujitsu 12RLQ includes credit for a 12.5 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct . - k Condenser. EnerqyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:5 ID: Page 2 of 5 Reg: 210-N0012951A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time-' 2010/08/11 15:53:26 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc 1 PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 3 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone Date Mandarina Casita ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 811112010 ANNUAL ENERGY USE SUMMARY Standard Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin TDV kBtU/ft2 r North East South West Space Heating 3.38 2.33 1.04 2.66 0.71 2.54 0.84 2.17 1.21 Space Cooling 100.76 99.53 1.23 99.47 1.29 93.17 7.59 98.19 2.57 Fans 1 20.69 31.32 -10.63 30.96 -10.26 29.28 -8.58 31.07 -10.38 Domestic Hot Water 75.19 65.77 9.42 65.77 9.42 65.77 9.42 65.77 9.42 Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 200.02 198.96 1.06 198.86 1.16 190.75 9.27 197.21 2.82 Percent Better Than Standard: 0.5 % 0.6 % 4.6 % 1.4 % BUILDING COMPLIES - HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED Fenestration Building Front Orientation: 'All Four Orientations Ext. Walls/Roof Wall Area Area Number of Dwelling Units: 1.00 (N) 140 8 Fuel Available at Site: Natural Gas (E) 200 0 Raised Floor Area: 0 (S) 140 39 Slab on Grade Area: 280 (vtq 200 15 Average Ceiling Height: 10.0 Roof280 0 Fenestration Average U-Factor: 0.35 TOTAL: 62 Average SHGC: 0.32 Fenestration/CFA Ratio: 22.1 % REMARKS THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT. (CEC Blueprint #60) t - i STATEMENT'OF COMPLIANCE This certificate of compliance lists the building features and specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts l the Administrative Regulations and Part 6 the Efficiency Standards of the California Code of Regulations. The documentation author hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Gallant Energy Consulting Company 8/11/2010 Address 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Name Mark Gallant, CEPE City/State/ZipCity/State/Zip Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-743-5408 Signed Date The individual with overall design responsibility hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application, and recognizes that compliance using duct design, duct sealing, verification of refrigerant charge, insulation installation quality, and building envelope sealing require installer testing and certification and field verification by an approved HERS rater. Pa[.syschlichr Designer or Owner (per Business & Professions Code) GHAEnterprises Company BL Farms Inc , Eleermnicallgr signed of calezzys.C. �i32i3@ps Address 30-875 Date Palm Dr #C Name City/State/Zip Cathedral City, CA 92234 Phone 760-250-8611 Signed License # Date Ener Pro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:5 ID: Page 3 of 5 Reg: 210-N0012951A-0006o000o-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:53:26 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Casita Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interior Frame Wall 132 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 casita Wall 101 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 casita Wall 185 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 casita Wall 200 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 casita Roof 280 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 casita Slab 280 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 casita FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area LI-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 1 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP casita 2 Window 24.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP casita 3 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP casita 4 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP casita X.- 1 . �"+'.:i.• .[1P .al; ��'S�'?+j�.r�..1 i{ 3'C'"yY � �" �y y .�i.,,,iy..�' r-`" � w� .. �y,. � r �1-'"' .�_�J,.�fy3.' .,bs .. I.fM q�'-e ,,�-�' ''"�'-11,'ry i�4iut..[n , ;� YF" ♦d.: y+ 1 (1) 'Ll-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hanq Left Fin Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt REA Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 1 Bug Screen 0.76 4.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2 Bug Screen 0.76 3 Bug Screen 0.76 4 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:5 ID: Page 4 of 5 Reg: 210-N0012951A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:53:26 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 5 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Casita . ' Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION System Name Zone Name Floor Area ft Volume Year Built New Existing Altered Removed casita casita 280 2,800 Totals 280 0 01 0 HVAC SYSTEMS _ System Name Qty.• Heating Type Min. Eff. Cooling Type Min. Eff. Thermostat Type Status casita - 1 Split Heat Pump 10.55 HSPF Split Heat Pump 21.0 SEER Setback` New #c.:: 0-r?+.f r7i'. 'tie :: r � f �rtA_-� ra � :Fi.�. �. �^.,•i. � .'r+�:, r. .... k�r .-��`�+:/ HVAC DISTRIBUTION.°r:, r,f4a �}�.s:.`'•#'._ -- �`s"+cam"y ; rr" .a@I .: i'z.> I` ¢I `� System Name a; ..R�- 1CI �Heatin ' 4 ..r; �4M¢.i . "CoolingDuct a? * xsa w: x.,r�. �'"... ,rye. Location -�* Duct;fl+�'' R Value V Ducts 'Q Tested? Status casita _ -,. Ductless / with Fan Ductless n/a n/a ❑ New 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ WATER HEATING SYSTEMS S stem Name Qty. Type . Distribution Rated Input Btuh Tank Cap. al Energy Factor or RE Standby Loss or Pilot Ext. Tank Insul. R- Value Status Rheem 42VR40 FHR=68 1 Small Gas No Pipe Insulation 40,000 40 0.62 n/a n/a New MULTI -FAMILY WATER HEATING DETAILS HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM PIPING Control E .E w Hot Water Piping Length ft o Q — System Name Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Insul. Thick. Qty. HP 7PlenumOutside Buried ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EnergyPro 5.1 by EnenqySoft User Number: 2F5 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:5 ID: Page 5 of 5 Reg: 210-N0012951A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:53:26 HERS PRovider:•Ca10ERTS, Inc v PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta' California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,115 Addition n/a # of Stories 1 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Construction Type Area Special Cavity (ft) Features see Part 2 of 5) Status Wall Wood Framed R-15 1,975 New Roof Wood Framed Attic R-38 3,115 Radiant Barrier Cool Roof New Slab Unheated Slab -on -Grade None 3,115 Perim = 320' New Wall Wood Framed R-15 609 New Door Opaque Door None 21 - New FENESTRATION U- Orientation Area(e) t Factor Exterior SHGC Overhang Sidefin' Shades Status Right (lM 4.0 0.350 0.32 12.0 none Bug Screen New s Right (lM „ypa ,10.0 0.330 0.34 .u.4.0,none'..'Bug-Screentav4b,,- New Right (lMt' 39.0 �f� O.�50 V 0.32; 7.0^ � }none Bug Screen New Right (W) f 21.0� 0.'330 0 34 ,, r7.0� Sk , i�noneF ; ,tom Bug Screen rk� New Right (,lM� 28 0' �' `0:350 Or32., ?'7.0 :kx, ;none ,W l� Bug Screen%," +> tlllew Rear (S)94;,15 0 0.350{0 32 w�;.r31:0�'� F;~none,, 5 O"ff Left (E) 25.6 $ � 0.350 0.32 2.0 none Bug Screen New Left(E) 28.0 0.330 0.34 none none Bug Screen New Left (E) 32.0 j 0.350 0.32 none - none Bug Screen New Right (NM 17.5 a 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Right (NlM 48.0 0.350 0.32 6.0 none Bug Screen New HVAC SYSTEMS Ot . Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New HVAC DISTRIBUTION Location Heating Duct Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status liv Ducted 'Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New sleep Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New WATER HEATING Ot . Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status 1 Large Gas 75 0.80 Recirc/Time+Temp New Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Page 1 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,115 Addition n/a # of Stories 1 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (ft) Features (see Part 2 of 5) Status FENESTRATION s U- Exterior Orientation Area(ft` Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Right (NW) 17.5 ; 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Front (N) „* 10.5 y, 0.330�0.34,,m6.O v.n none .a.Bug-Screenf+a1. New Front (N), 48.0 ?:(t .0.!50V 0.32 ; 6.0 1 j� r ,'none �-x8ug Screen ' � New Front (!V) ;-� 1'0 5 ' 0.330 0 34 ¢a 6:0f " ; (one -T, Bug Screen." New Right (1�,.,25.0°y0:350 032 .'none Bug Screeni ';`; rNew Rear(Sjic-is,2140:350�03260': none;,'j'Bug.Screen.:"tf}�yr�New Rear (S) 25.0 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Rear (S) „ ,. " ; w 40.0 0.350 0.32 none none Bug Screen New t HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status HVAC DISTRIBUTION Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status Energ Pro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-OST11:12:5 ID: Page 2 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration bate/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 2 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 SPECIAL FEATURES INSPECTION CHECKLIST The enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Compliance for all orientations is specified, see section 151 (c) 2 of the Standards and section RA 1-3.3 in Appendix RA-1 of the Residential Compliance Manual. The DHW System Bradford White M-2-XR75S6BN is a non-NAECA large storage gas water heater. Verify DHW details. A hot water recirculation systems has been modeled. Verification of type is required. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Reflectance = 0.42, Emittance = 0.88 shall be rated and labeled by the Cool Roof Rating Council in accordance with Section 10-113 of the standards. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic includes credit for a Radiant Barrier that is Continuous meeting eligibility and installation criteria as specified in Residential Appendix RA4.2.2. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Concrete Tile (10 #/so Roofing requires verification. r -04 TV71-1 - HERStREQUIREDIVERIFICATION _ 11d� L`y"y1 j Items in this-ectlon,require-field-testing and/or verrficaUon?by a certfied HERS, Rater"zThe�inspector must receive a completed CF-4R form for each'of the measures listed below for final to be given. The Cooling System-Trane TUD1B080A9601A14TTR3060A 1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. - The HVAC System liv includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. r The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is required to verify that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. The Cooling System Trane TUD1B080A9481A/4TTR3042A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System sleep includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. , The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testino is required to verifv that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. Parm se-hFichir - GiYA �Eu[er�rrises fleamnieally Signed at CaICEM S.c1 .Bl:afs�a EnergyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 Run Code: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Page 3 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 3 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone Date Mandarina Plan 1 ❑ Multi Family 0 Existing+ Addition/Alteration 1811112010 ANNUAL ENERGY USE SUMMARY Standard Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin TDV kBtu/ft2 r North East South West Space Heating 1.92 2.61 -0.70 2.75 -0.84 2.39 - -0.47 2.17 -0.26 Space Cooling 58.61 48.72 9.89 47.26 11.35 48.34 10.27 47.22 11.39 Fans 11.66 10.45 1.22 10.17 1.49 10.36 1.30 10.13 1.54 Domestic Hot Water 11.71 16.98 -5.27 16.98 -5.27 16.98 -5.27 16.98 -5.27 Pumps 0.00 0.18 -0.18 0.18 -0.18 0.18 -0.18 0.18 -0.18 Totals 83.90 78.94 4.96 77.35 6.55 78.25 5.65 76.68 7.22 Percent Better Than Standard: 5.9 % 7.8 % 6.7 % 8.6 % BUILDING COMPLIES - HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED Fenestration Building Front Orientation: All Four orientations Ext. Walls/Roof Wall Area Area Number of Dwelling Units: 1.00 (N) 540 69 Fuel Available at Site: Natural Gas (E) 940 85 Raised Floor Area: 0 (S) 570 ' 101 Slab on Grade Area: 3,115 (IM 1,020 210 Average Ceiling Height: 10.0 Roof 3,115 0 Fenestration Average U-Factor: 0.34 TOTAL: 465 Average SHGC: 0.33 Fenestration/CFA Ratio: 14.9 % REMARKS- t THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT. (CEC Blueprint #60) a } 7m SIX STATEMENT'OF COMPLIANCE This certificate of complianc)lists the building features and specifications needed . to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 the Administrative Regulations and Part 6 the Efficiency Standards of the California Code of Regulations. The documentation author hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Gallant Energy Consulting Company • 8/11/2010 Address 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Name Mark Gallant, CEPE City/State/ZipCiiy/State/Zip Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-743-5408 Signed Date The individual with overall design responsibility hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application, and recognizes that compliance using duct design, duct sealing, verification of refrigerant charge, insulation installation quality, and building envelope sealing require installer testing and certification and field verification by an approved HERS rater. Designer or Owner (per Business & Professions Code) Company BL Farms Inc Address 30-875 Date Palm Dr #C Name City/State/Zip Cathedral City, CA 92234 Phone 760-250-8611 Signed License # Date EnerpyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Pa e 4 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential • (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 ' 1 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavit Exterior Frame Interior Frame Wall 378 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 5 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 433 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Roof 1,815 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 liv Slab 1,815 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 liv Wall 349 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4:3.1-A4 liv Door 21 0.500 None 0 90 New 4.5.1-A4 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 97 0.095 R-15 315 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 101 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 335 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 464 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 162 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Roof 1,300 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 sleep Slab 1,30E 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 slee FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 1 Window 4.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 2 Window 10.0 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 3 Window 24.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 4 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 5 Window , _ _ 1.0.5 0.330 NFRC _0.34 NFRC _ 270 New_„- NonMetal Lowe2 FX, ,� liv • 6 Window- 0.5 0.330 °NFRC rt " +r0.34' NFRC,•. , - 270 New 4 S NonMetal Lowe2 FX . ,i f.' , liv 7 Window • 128.0 0.350 NFRC 'i -:0.32 'NFRC.: 270 New, . l j NonMetal;Lowe2 0P.¢. = t. _ liv 8 Window 15. p,, 0.350, NFRC,' F = 0.32 NFRC' " f 180 New: NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv ft 9 Window 25/0 fO.35a NFRC, 0.32 NFRC'-, -V 90 New.. NonMetal Lowe2 OP i;, liv,;,i; .s 10 Window 0 ,t 2.0, e0.330 NFRC • t 0.34' NFRC _k, #90 'Newt t*:-, NonMefa/ Lowe2 FX.. k ; Iroi'r: -J;1 11 Windows .� Av 2.0' :; 0.33E NFRCy: --46.34 :NFRC °' ; ;!&f'90 NewNonMetal Lowe2 FX0A�� 12 Window 10.0 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC`-" "'90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX ` liv 13 Window 10.0 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 14 Window". `20.0 0.35E NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 15 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 16 Window 17.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv (1) Ll-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Ri ht Fin H t I Wd Len H t LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 1 Bug Screen 0.76 2.01 2.0 12.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 5 Bug Screen 0.76 7.5 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6 Bug Screen 0.76 7.5 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 7 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 8 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 31.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 9 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 10 Bug Screen 0.76 11 Bug Screen 0.76 12 Bug Screen 0.76 13 Bug Screen 0.76 14 Bug Screen 0.76 15 Bug Screen 0.76 16 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.01 2.0 Ener Pro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 Run Code: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Page 5 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavitv Exterior Frame Interiorl Frame FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 17 Window 48.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 18 Window 17.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 19 Window 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX sleep 20 Window 48.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 21 . Window_ , 10.5 0.330 NFRC : 0.34. NFRC __ _ _ _ 0 New.___, NonMetal Lowe2 FX. sleep 22 Windo`,w : `%12.5 0.350 NFRC Ao 7r 0.32' NFRC �F , 270 New;lK, NonMetal Lowe2 OP. }or., 'K; sleep 23 Window "12.5 0.350 NFRC. ,,. 0.32 'NFRC 1 270 New '4 Nonfdetal,Lowe2 OP_L ;Y g,- sleep 24 25 Window Window 21.4."T40.350,NFRC 2Sf0 ,f 9.336 .`' NFRCt1, 0.32 0.34 NFRC . NFRC; ;, „/ 180 V. 180 New :a NonMetal New � wj' NonMetal Lowe2 OP y !'.? Lowe2 FX _ y�ty. ti.. sleep sleep ,,w ,, 26 Window j20.0, •,0.350 NFRC; ! 0.32 NF,RC NonMetal Lowe2 OP,. sleep", .}. 0VJ JJ 27 WfndowA:0:.k20:0';=0.356_NFRCf-4j'-xv0:32 NFRC' ''186 New. NonMetal Lowe2 6P-? `"•; sleep(J% %V0 28 Window 4.0 0.330 NFRC ` -:1 0.34 NFRC -' ' 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX - sleep 29 Window _ 4.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep •(1) Ll-Factor Type: 116-A`= Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin . Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LEA REA Dist Len • H t Dist Len H t 17 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 18 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 19 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 20 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 21 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 22 Bug Screen 0.76 23 Bug Screen 0.76 24 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 25 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 26 Buq Screen 0.76 s 27 Bug Screen 0.76 28 Bug Screen 0.76 29 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Page 6 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000 Registration-Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 5 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 Building Type © Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION System Name Zone Name Floor Area ft Volume Year Built New Existing Altered Removed liv liv 1,815 18,150 sleep sleep 1,300 13,000 Totals 1 3,1151 0 01 0 HVAC SYSTEMS ; System Name Qty. Heating Type Min. Eff. Cooling Type Min. Eff. Thermostat Type Status liv 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New sleep 1 ' Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New � � e� 1' f � �k' i •.Z-1 §.�` l r �' ;� 4' {r yr�� iit� I •� •<< �'f y1 i .�'-w'. '� y�`.. 7• -r� „,i% 'fit'. .Y}7�,,;�,,.: �A E; �V a�• -•, � r��; -,. -„ �` tl'a'I', HVA'C DISTRIBUTION, t,�� yx �#' 'i # :'. , ._. I p-- A, "'4 A -I. System Name^ %rr,: .� +r� Heatin� ,k; .. � " Coolinq .. -,, ,aA Duct Location �"NjDuct�V R-Value V Ducts Tested? Status liv Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 m New sleep' Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 0 New 1 ❑ - ❑ WATER HEATING SYSTEMS S stem Name Qty. Type Distribution Rated Input Btuh Tank Cap. al Energy Factor or RE Standby Loss or Pilot Ext. Tank Insul. R- Value Status Bradford White M-2-XR75 1 Large Gas Recirc/Time+Temp 76,000 75 0.80 2.00 % 12.0 New MULTI -FAMILY WATER HEATING DETAILS HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM PIPING Control E E v w Hot Water Piping Length ft o a System Name Le In—Diameter Pipe Insul. Thick. Qty. HP Plenum Outside Buried ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EnergyPro 5.1 by EnenqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:12:5 ID: Page 7 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012952A-000000000-0000, Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:55:46 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,469 Addition n/a # of Stories 2 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST ❑ Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Construction Type Area Special Cavity (ft) Features (see Part 2 of 5) Status Wall Wood Framed R-15 2,650 New Roof Wood Framed Attic R-38 3,115 Radiant Barrier New Slab Unheated Slab -on -Grade None 3,115 Perim = 320' New Wall Wood Framed R-15 609 New Door Opaque Door None 21 New FENESTRATION U- Exterior Orientation Area(ft) `- Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Right (VIq 4.0 i 0.350 0.32 12.0 none Bug Screen New Right (Vlo � 10.0 -� 0.33045FP*.,0.34�,4.0_ , .,Wpone ,%, ,,,Bug -Screens New Right (VIA 4 39.0 `Q.350 , I< 0.32 `"; 7.0 , none • . ;Bug Screen"= New Right (L V40 < p'21. 0_ q, �0.330 0 34 ; - 7.0 : +none r > : _� Bug Screen . New Right(M " j �28.OIj ; ,0.350 032.�?7.0 F' Zone _ "`:j'BugScreen Rear(S)+ "" ,, ' 15.0 }� ' 0.350 032 ""31.O none„ ,x:�, BugjS teen�7j., , J41(fNew Left (E) 25.0 Oa350 0.32 2.0 none ~ « Bug Screen New Left (E),._- "' %, 31.6 1 0.330 0.34 none none Bug Screen New Left (E) 32.0 1 0.350 0.32 none none Bug Screen New Right (NVIO 17.5 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Right (NVV) 48.0 0.350 0.32 6.0 none Bug Screen = New HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New 1 Split Heat Pump 10.55 HSPF Split Heat Pump 2 1. 0 SEER Setback New HVAC DISTRIBUTION Location Heating Duct Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status liv Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New sleep Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New loft Ductless / with Fan Ductless n/a n/a New WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status 1 Large Gas 75 0.80 Recirc/Time+Temp New Energ Pro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 1 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:56:35 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family .❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 1811112010 Date Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,469 Addition n/a # of Stories 2 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (ft) Features see Part 2 of 5) Status , y FENESTRATION r U- Exterior Orientation Area(e) ` Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Right (NtM 17.5 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Front (N) , 10.5 ' _ 0.330, .,E 0.34,...6.0,,...E none .,,,Bug Screenr.o,,, ' New Front N 48.0 %d fi'" - t- . - f .•w ( )1� , J , 0.350 0.32 '- , 6.0 _ y ..none; �A j Bug Screen t New ront (N)s ,,` 10.5� 0.330 0 34y i 6 0"� �+�a=. none j Bug Screen�'E , , New ` ,.110 0 6.350 0 32 none ; none Bu Screen +, Newear [Right S �0.350 0 32"`�6.0yam" r' one �'° Bu rScreenys /�� New Ii:.,,-l. r ....-„.e'„" s�l'F:.,' k . �ii„''re g° �A'-�4+,Re1R" ( ),.;.a.._ear (S) 25.0$ 0.330 0.34 6.0 none Bug Screen New Rear (S) ;- r:.r^"" 40.0 0.350 0.32 none none Bug Screen New s s HVAC SYSTEMS Ot . Heating Min. Eff' Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status HVAC DISTRIBUTION Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status WATER HEATING Ot . Type Gallons Min. Eff -Distribution Status Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: - Page 2 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:S6:35 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 2 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 SPECIAL FEATURES INSPECTION CHECKLIST The enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Compliance for all orientations is specified, see section 151 (c) 2 of the Standards and section RA1-3.3 in Appendix RA-1 of the Residential Compliance Manual. The DHW System Bradford White M-2-XR75S6BN is a non-NAECA large storage gas water heater. Verify DHW details. A hot water recirculation systems has been modeled. Verification of type is required. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic includes credit for a Radiant Barrier that is Continuous meeting eligibility and installation criteria as specified in Residential Appendix RA4.2.2. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Concrete Tile (10 Wsl) Roofing requires verification. HERS,'REQUI'RED, VERIFICATION `� , ► Y; , w ~� '�� "! ` ' Items in this section require field testing and/or verification by;a_certified'HERS.:Rater. The inspector must receive a completed CF-4R form for each of the measures listed below for final to be given. The Cooling System -Trane TUD 1 B080A9601A/4TTR3060A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. i The HVAC System liv includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. - Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is required to verify that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. The Cooling System Trane TUD1B080A9481A14TTR3042A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System sleep includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is required to verifv that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. F�liM ScraFilchit The Cooling System Fujitsu 12RLQ includes credit for a 12.5 EER Condenser. A certified HERc GHA Enterprises Condenser. EirectronicaUg signed at calezE 'S.c. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is rMU12azo EnergyPro, 5.1 by Ener Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 3 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11;15:56:35 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 3 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone Date Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 811112010 ANNUAL ENERGY USE SUMMARY Standard Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin TDV kBtu/ft2-yr North East South West Space Heating 2.82 3.07 -0.25 3.18 -0.36 2.76 0.06 2.62 0.20 Space Cooling 60.03 53.64 6.39 50.75 9.28 52.62 7.41 51.72 8.31 Fans 12.18 12.43 -0.25 11.72 0.46 12.22 -0.03 12.05 0.14 Domestic Hot Water 9.90 13.67 -3.78 13.67 -3.78 13.67 -3.78 13.67 -3.78 Pumps 0.00 0.16 -0.16 0.16 -0.16 0.16 -0.16 0.16 -0.16 Totals 84.93 82.97 1.96 79.48 5.45 81.43 3.50 80.23 4.70 Percent Better Than Standard: 2.3 % 6.4 % 4.1 % 5.5 % BUILDING COMPLIES - HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED Fenestration Building Front Orientation: All Four Orientations Ext. Walls/Roof Wall Area Area Number of Dwelling Units: 1.00 (N) 698 69 Fuel Available at Site: Natural Gas (E) 1,164 89 Raised Floor Area: 0 (S) 728 101 Slab on Grade Area: 3,115 (vto 1,244 295 Average Ceiling Height: 9.8 Roof 3,115 0 Fenestration Average U-Factor. 0.34 TOTAL: 554 Average SHGC: 0.33 Fenestration/CFA Ratio: 16.0 % REMARKS THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT. (CEC Blueprint #60) �j' ��♦•",,_,,,•,^ ` { ,tee Y "H'/ �"Y .r • � Ce >�' .rye'"- ��.•F[�'f y i`.� :ti: �. Y+. ';.".r f ,r '. Y" .�« •F_;,y. �~ ' TCY • - �+••�7'� • Sa .. .�. T_ ,ir .nS.rt ;,�y - - ;A..� +�i. ,. M/-^'.. . :. .. ,. STATEMENT'OF COMPLIANCE This certificate of compliance' lists the building features and specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Partsfl the Administrative Regulations and Part 6 the Efficiency Standards of the California Code of Regulations. The documentation author hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Gallant Energy Consulting Company 8/11/2010 Address 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Name Mark Gallant, CEPE . City/State/ZipCity/State/Zip Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-743-5408 Signed Date The individual with overall design responsibility hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application, and recognizes that compliance using duct design, duct sealing, verification of refrigerant charge, insulation installation quality, and building envelope sealing require installer testing and certification and field verification by an approved HERS rater. Designer or Owner (per Business & Professions Code) Company BL Farms Inc Address 30-875 Date Palm Dr #C Name 'City/State/Zip Cathedral City, CA 92234 Phone 760-250-8611 Signed" License # Date _ r EnerqyPro 5.1 by EneilqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 4 of 8 0 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000. Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:56:35 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments CavitylExterior Frame Interior Frame Wall 378 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall • 5 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 433 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Roof 1,461 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 liv Slab 1,815 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 liv Wall 349 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Door 21 0.500 None 0 90 New 4.5.1-A4 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 97 0.095 R-15 315 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 101MO.7 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 335R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 464R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 162R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Roof 1,300R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 sleep Slab 1,300None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 sleep Wall 158 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments . 1 Window 4.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 2 Window 10.0 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 3 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 4 Window 24.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 5 Window_, m _ 1.0.5 0.330 NFRC -0.34, NFRC _. - 270 New� NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 6 Window,;., - "� 10.5 0.330 °NFRC ,.E'y '0.34' NFRC41. =270 Neiv, lr i NonMetal Lowe2 FX ,,AFC. ga r liv 7 Window., 28.0 0.350 NFRC yJ . •" 0.32 (NFRC;+',: 270 New ,l NonMetal;Lowe2 0P `:; 3q' liv 8 Window 15. p .0:350, NFRC..' `' 0.32 NFRC. 4 .4180 New;,r,NonMetal Lowe2 OP '1t >' ��, liv 45 . - 9 Window 25`0 ,10:350 ,NFRC_, 0.32 NFRC �,. V•: 90 New ;- ;> NonMetal Lowe2 OP _ liv p, 10 Window >t 2.0;, 0:330. NFRC�,p 0.34 NF,RC�l �f90 'New,,_. ,NonMetal Lowe2 FX;.5` live"tt: cif j; 11 WindowA 1'. �0:330 NFRC�M, "6.34-'NFRC< 961 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX.N,' l7iqX0 11v*,, o 12 Window 10.0 0.330 NFRC`:'0.34 NFRC '90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX " liv 13 Window 10.01 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv • 14 • Window- '20.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 15 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 16 Window 17.5 ,, 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv (1) Ll-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value . (2) SHGC Type: 116-13 = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len . H t 1 Bug Screen 0.76 2.0 2.0 12.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 5 Bug Screen 0.76 7.5 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 6 Bug Screen 0.76 7.5 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 7 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 8 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 31.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 9 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 5.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 10 Bug Screen 0.76 11 Bug Screen 0.76 12 Bug Screen 0.76 13 Bug Screen 0.76 14 Bug Screen 0.76 15 Bug Screen . 0.76 16 JBug Screen 0.76 7.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 5 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:56:35 HERS,PRovider: CalCERTS, Inc i W CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name" Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type la Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments CavitylExterior Frame Interiorl Frame Wall 220 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft Wall 158 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft Wall 139 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft Roof 354 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 loft FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 17 Window 48.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 18 Window 17.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 315 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 19 Window 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX sleep 20 Window 48.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 21 Window- ,___ 10.5 0.330 NFRC _0.34_ NFRC_,_ __• . _ 0 New_, .�- NonMetal Lowe2 FX, sleep 22 Window 'N12.5 0.350 °NFRC ,,.d .;+"0.32' NFRC s --270 New: r-_11 NonMetal Lowe2 OP ,}tt 'It. sleep 23 Window = '412.5 0.350 NFRCi 4 -a '0.32 NFRC, ^ 270 New ..-T ,r NonMetal Lowe2 OP.4' 7,7A sleep 24 Window 21.4;!0.350,'NFRC`7 " 0.32 NFRC 4 180 New,..oP NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 25 Window 25i0 f 0.330 NFRC r,i 0.34 NFRC ,- 44 480 New k, �`.1 ' NonMetal .Lowe2 FX _ sleep, 26 Window , f ;20. 0, )v0.350 NFRC x [ 0.32 NFRC r180 'New :1, NonMetal Lowe2 0P C"sleep ' 27 windowA f • §,,w.6+ s� 0.350 NFRC# =: 1*-,032 NFRC `A 180 New' le NonMetal Lowe2 OP-'".dw,*K�--, sleep`.! t' rtj, 28 Window `4.0 0.330 NFRC '+ ""'' 0.34 NFRC ` 901 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX -" sleep 29 Window 4.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 30 - Window 1-1.8 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX loft 31 Window 1:8 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX loft 32 Window 16.0 . 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft (1) Ll-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value - (2) SHGC T e: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Right Fin H7qFF Wd Len H t LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 17 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 18 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 19 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 20 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 21 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 22 Bug Screen 0.76 23 Bug Screen 0.76 24 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 2.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 25 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 26 Bug Screen 0.76 27 Bug Screen 0.76 28 Bug Screen 0.76 29 Bug Screen 0.76 30 Bug Screen 0.76 31 Bug Screen 0.76 32 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 6 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11,15:56:35 HERS PRovider: CalCERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments CavitylExterior Frame Interior Frame FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 33 Window 16.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP /oft 34 Window 20.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP /oft 35 Window 33.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft Tay, AFY . --'rd' � ..f�?` _-_ir x s.: � ` J, t• � , }� .. �I -. �„a's�...w - :3(i:e'v y�1 d•.� fx'y �e.•.-i't.E. .. d,.A p.1. + p!L.'..-'3s,�?' 'b. � � I ..r a .`J„f �..s -�k F'• �r ..1� � � t ,,a,�" ; yr, ».. y - 'a - !�i r... � {fyj�y.'�'.�,� ,{�� -. 'Ye. (1) U-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 33 Bug Screen 0.76 34 Bug Screen 0.76 35 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 /D: Page 7 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:56:35 , HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 5 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 1 + Loft Building Type © Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION System Name Zone Name Floor Area ft Volume Year Built New Existing Altered Removed liv liv 1,815 18,150 sleep _ sleep 1,300 13,000 loft loft 354 2,832 Totals 3,4691 01 01 0 HVAC SYSTEMS System Name Qt : HeatingT e Min. Eff. CoolingType Min. Eff. Thermostat Type Status liv 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New sleep 1 Central Furnace 80 % AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New loft 1 .Split Heat'Puirip" ° 10.55,HSPF Split -,Heat -Pump •21:0-SEER. Setback New At &W.Mer.. WS HVAC;:DISTRIBUTION*t `.•* ,-.i tk.A f `t,�'= of_ � �'_`:�„__"" �.`` �, ; AKXR System Name Heating' �,r , ` Coolin ,Y':nh1*•7N�.�aaDUCt+It Duct Location R-Value DUCtS'. Tested? Status liv ,,T, Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 m New sleep" Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 IZI New loft Ductless/with Fan Ductless n/a n/a ❑ New WATER HEATING SYSTEMS S stem Name Qty. Type Distribution Rated Input Btuh Tank Cap. al Energy Factor or RE Standby Loss or Pilot Ext. Tank Insul. R- Value ` Status Bradford White M-2-XR75 1 Large Gas Recirc/Time+Temp 76,000 75 0.80 '2.00 % 12.0 New MULTI -FAMILY WATER HEATING DETAILS HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM PIPING Control E E w Hot Water Piping Length ft o N c System Name Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Insul. Thick. bt . .HP Plenum Outside Buried ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ .i ❑ ❑ EnerRyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:16:0 ID: Page 8 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012954A-000000000-0000, Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:56:35 ,,HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc', 9 PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 2,918 Addition n/a It of Stories 1 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (ft) Features (see Part 2 of 5) Status Wall Wood Framed R-15 1,687 New Roof Wood Framed Attic R-38 2,918 Radiant Barrier Cool Roof New Slab Unheated Slab -on -Grade None 2,918 Perim = 246' New Wall Wood Framed R-15 489 New Door Opaque Door None 21 New FENESTRATION ; U- Exterior Orientation Area(ft`) ',Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Front (N) 10.5 0.330 0.34 7.0 none Bug Screen New Front (N) ,,,,. 24.0 0.350, 032.E ,7.0,..E##Mnoqe -.Bug -Screens New Front (N),�� 10.5 J � `0.�30 0.341 7.0 nonet -Bug Scre n�; New Front (N) ' } 0 0., tf0,'350 0 32 - none , ,' &' one``. x.Bug Screen: Ley; 'New Right (lN) - S28 0 _ 0:330 0 34 :++none'_, .;none _- _Bug Screen xk #New g12 5 lc r 0.350 0 32 . 16:0 none, Bu Screen f ,fin <r yNew Right (� �- �i 9' .fit.! ,�'1 !:! Rear (S) 140.6 1 0.350 0.32 none none f Bug Screen .. .. New Front (N)_,,,..--15.0 0.350 0.32 2.0 none Bug Screen New Right (tM 12.5 1 0.350 0.32 none none Bug Screen New , Right (lAq 51.4 0.350 0.32 2.0 none Bug Screen New Right (tM 15.0 0.350 0.32 10.0 none Bug Screen New HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New 1 'Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New HVAC DISTRIBUTION Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location . R-Value Status liv Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New. sleep " Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status 1 Large Gas 75 0.80 Recirc/Time+Temp New Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 1 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012955A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area -2,918 Addition n/a # of Stories 1 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST ❑ Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. El Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (ft) Features see Part 2 of 5) Status FENESTRATION U- Exterior Orientation Area(fe) `.Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins Shades Status Left (E) 28.0 t 0.330 0.34 none none Bug Screen New Leh (E) 36.0 _ 0.350;,r ,ap., 0.32—none none 1w Bug New yy j fSScree[npwjt,,,, ii'—�" �_ �; ��9 ".•�--.��,�+ �R "i��= 3 � Y��f`-�� `�" I ' ;a34.v�S'+�. «��ie r ��'`'x,;'R d` 9' 1R'� `t�'`;•`'��il I " HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status HVAC DISTRIBUTION Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Pa e 2 of 7 Reg: 210-NO012955A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11'15:57:14 HERS PRovider: CalCERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 2 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone ElMulti Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 SPECIAL FEATURES INSPECTION CHECKLIST The enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Compliance for all orientations is specified, see section 151 (c) 2 of the Standards and section RA1-3.3 in Appendix RA-1 of the Residential Compliance Manual. The DHW System Bradford White M-2-XR75S6BN is a non-NAECA large storage gas water heater. Verify DHW details. A hot water recirculation systems has been modeled. Verification of type is required. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Reflectance = 0.42, Emittance = 0.88 shall be rated and labeled by the Cool Roof Rating Council in accordance with Section 10-113 of the standards. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic includes credit for a Radiant Barrier that is Continuous meeting eligibility and installation criteria as specified in Residential Appendix RA4.2.2. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Concrete Tile (10 #/so Roofing requires verification. r _ HERS .REQUIRED` VERIFICATION `,X t" Itemsmitiiissectiori require f'ielddest'in andlor verification b a certrfied NERS'RaterThe"iiis sector mr'eceve a i._- . completed CF-4R form for each of the measures listed below for final to be given. The Cooling System •Trane TUD 1 B080A9481A14TTR3042A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System liv includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. r• The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is required to verify that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. , The Cooling System Trane TUDIB08OA9481A14TTR3042A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System sleep includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. - Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is reauired to verifv that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. Pairm sch icht GJVt4Elm terppis ex - E1eCrM12aCaUy Signed Olt CarCN'S.c, 8/22/2020 EnerpyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 3 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012955A-000000000-0000. Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS,)Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 3 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone Date Mandarina Plan 2 ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 1811112010 ANNUAL ENERGY USE SUMMARY Standard Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin TDV kBtu/ft2-yr North East South West Space Heating - 1.50 1.68 -0.18 1.93 -0.43 1.89 -0.39 1.69 -0.19 Space Cooling 58.42 49.11 9.30 49.75 8.66 48.27 10.14 49.50 8.91 Fans 11.63 10.49 1.14 10.63 1.00 10.35 1.29 10.58 1.06 Domestic Hot Water 12.50 18.13 -5.63 18.13 -5.63 18.13 -5.63 18.13 -5.63 Pumps 0.00 0.19 -0.19 0.19 -0.19 0.19 -0.19 0.19 -0.19 Totals 84.05 79.61 4.45 80.64 3.41 78.83 5.22 80.09 3.96 Percent Better Than Standard: 5.3 % 4.1 % 6.2 % 4.7 % BUILDING COMPLIES - HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED Fenestration Building Front Orientation: All Four Orientations Ext. Walls/Roof Wall Area Area Number of Dwelling Units: 1.00 (N) 810 140 Fuel Available at Site: Natural Gas . (E) 670 64 Raised Floor Area: 0 (S) 540 140 Slab on Grade Area: 2,918 (tM 640 119 Average Ceiling Height: 10.0 Roof 2,918 0 Fenestration Average U-Factor: 0•35 TOTAL: 463 Average SHGC: 0.32 Fenestration/CFA Ratio: 15.9 % REMARKS -6 THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT. (CEC Blueprint #60) t STATEMENT'OF COMPLIANCE This certificate of compliance.)ists the building features and specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 the Administrative Regulations and Part 6 the Efficiency Standards of the California Code of Regulations. The documentation author hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Gallant Energy Consulting Company 8/11/2010 Address 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Name Mark Gallant, CEPS City/State/ZipCityiState/Zip Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-743-5408 Signed Date The individual with overall design responsibility hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application, and recognizes that compliance using duct design, duct sealing, verification of refrigerant charge, insulation installation quality, and building envelope sealing require installer testing and certification and field verification by an approved HERS rater. Designer or Owner (per Business & Professions Code) Company BL Farms Inc Address 30-875 Date Palm Dr.#C Name City/State/Zip Cathedral City, CA 92234 Phone 760-250-8611 Signed License # Date EnerqvPro 5.1 by EnerlqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 4 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012955A-0000'00000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS PRovider Ca10ERTS, Inc 4 0 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interior Frame Wall 115 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 360 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Roof 1,350 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 liv Slab 1,350 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 45 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 161 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 140 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 606 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Roof 1,568 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 sleep Slab 1,568 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 sleep Wall 229 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 slee Door 21 0.500 None 0 90 New 4.5.1-A4 sleep FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 1 Window 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 1 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 2 Window 24.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 3 Window' 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 4 Window 40.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 5 Window _ _ 4.0.0 0.350 NFRC _0.32 NFRC 0 Ne_NonMetal_Low_e2 w�e. OP ,., _ liv 6 Window'`'- 0.330 NFRC,,: �`'0.34 NFRC � r~ -270 New44, .S NonMetal L6i4ie2 FX•.^K A, liv 7 Window. '110.0 0.330 NFRC 4 ' 0.34 'NFRC;"- r° 270 New-, t- .i NonMeta1cLowe2 F3C " :;, v liv 8 Window 4.0 A 0.330; NFRCV) 0.34 NFRC ' .,. 270 New->;.°e'NonMetal Lowe2 FX r `fly liv 9 Window 4:00.330 NFRC?41, 0.34 NFRC _s'f', 270 lew,f4,A NonMetal Lowe2 FX 10 Window 4;12.5; y,0.350, NFRC 0.3.2 NFRC; �270'New `# NonMetal Lowe2 OP,. k4 11 Window ,-)( if,;4o.6; ;-0.350 NFRC•.,' -�0:32 NFRC, 180 New'- NonMetal Lowe2 12 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC- . ' 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP ` liv 13 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 14 Window' 25.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 15 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 16 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep (1) Ll-Factor Type: 1.16-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-13 = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt REA Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 1 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4 Bug Screen 0.76 5 Bug Screen 0.76 " 6 Bug Screen 0.76 7 Bug Screen 0.76 8 Bug Screen 0.76 9 Bug Screen 0.76 10 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 2.5 16.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 11 Bug Screen 0.76 12 Bug Screen 0.76 13 Bug Screen 0.76 14 Bug Screen 0.76 15 JBugr Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 16 JBug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 5 of 7. Reg: 210-NO01295SA-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Area U-. Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interior Frame -Type FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 17 Window 30.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 18 Window 21.4 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 19 Window, 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 20 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 21 Window-- _ _ 25.0 0.350 NFRC _0.32_ NFRC __ _ _ 180 New � NonMetal Lowe2 Op ,�, _, sleep 22 Window' N1 2.5 0.350 NFRC � ir+' 0.32 NFRC`f' ._ . - 180 INeiNzx.. NonMetal _ Lowe2 � ;. QP.,. 'sleep 23 Window, 4.0 0.330 NFRCd 1't 0.34 NFRC'a 90 New:_ _ NonMetalLowe2 FX,`, :- Y sleep 24 Window 4.0,- 0.330, NFRC-!?-. 0.34 NFRC_s^ , 4' 90 New4_�'NonMetal Lowe2 FX �!•': sleep 25 Window 20'0 10.330 NF,RCsj 0.34 NFRC: , V 90 New•:t+, NonMetal Lowe2 FX '!g- , sleep 26 Window 4 ,0 9.0; �0.350 NFRC'4 0.32 NFRC4;�v �90 'New,ai . NonMetal Lowe2 OP_ �' � , sleep`,1 it' f t 27 WindowA # k20.0: 1..,0.356 NFRCs 7 -q0.32 NFRC'rf M� 90 New : NonMetal Lowe2 0P:"1+, '_;'sleep;/ 0 � 28 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC'-I, y 10.32 NFRC <'.. 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP " _, sleep (1) Ll-Factor Type: (2) SHGC Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type I SHGC Window Ove hanq Left Fin Ri ht Fin HF7 Wd Len H t LEA REA Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 17 Bug Screen 0.76 5.01 6.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 18 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 2.7 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 19 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 20 Bug Screen 0.76 21 Bug Screen 0.76 22 Bug Screen 0.76 23 Bug Screen 0.76 24 Bug Screen 0.76 25 Buq Screen 0.76 26 Bug Screen 0.76 27 Bug Screen 0.76 28 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 6 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012955A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS PRovider: CalCERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 5 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION System Name Zone Name Floor Area ft Volume Year Built New Existing Altered Removed liv liv 1,350 13,500 sleep sleep 1,568 15,680 Totals 21918 01 0 0 HVAC SYSTEMS System Name Qty. Heating Type Min. Eff. Cooling Type Min. Eff. Thermostat Type Status liv _ 1 , Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New sleep 1 ' Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New :t." HVAC DISTRIBUTION ,'-::i System Name Heatin ' Cooling Duct Location Duct.1 R-Value Ducts Tested? Status liv ..-, Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 m New sleep' Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 _ New P • ❑ WATER HEATING SYSTEMS S stem Name Qty. Type Distribution Rated Input Btuh Tank Cap. al Energy Factor or RE Standby Loss or Pilot Ext. Tank Insul. R- Value Status Bradford White 10-2-XR75 1 Large Gas _ Recirc/Time+Temp 76,000 75 0.80 2.00 % 12.0 New MULTI -FAMILY WATER HEATING DETAILS HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM PIPING Control E w o_ Hot Water Piping Length ft o Q — System Name Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Insul. Thick. Qty. - HP Plenum Outside Buried EnergyPro 5.1 by Ener Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-08T11:13:2 ID: Page 7 of 7 Reg: 210-N0012955A-000000000-0000' Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:57:14 HERS,PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc .. a . PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 1811112010 Date Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,216 Addition n/a # of Stories 2 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST_ IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be'provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. IZI Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Construction Type Area Special Cavity(ft) Features (see Part 2 of 5) Status Wall Wood Framed R-15 2,200 New Roof Wood Framed Attic R-38 3,216 Radiant Barrier Cool Roof New Slab Unheated Slab -on -Grade None 2,918 Perim = 246' New Wall Wood Framed R-15 489 New Door Opaque Door None 21 New FENESTRATION U- Exterior Orientation Area(e) "Factor SHGC OverhangSidefins Shades Status Front (N) 10.5 0.330 0.34 7.0 none Bug Screen New Front(N) _,,,,,y.�„ 24.0 } 0.350,�.-�+_�,0.32_7,,0 .,.,.=none „Pug- Screen �.., New Front N r,�" : 10.5 ry 0.330 0 34+ :�` 7.0�" <wq� 'none Bu Screen New Front 0 32;• `none """ none ^' _'Bug Screen,.. New Right (!M. jw, t28.0" r s'0.330 Of34^:t none, ,t hone ._ *� Bug Screen', ,�; , *"°+�"►'j jAh Right 0 32 `"" 16 Oaf` V"jnone, I ;, Bug Screen 9 (lM `'s g= KNew Rear (S) 140.0 '" 0.350 0.32 �^ none none Bug Screen New Front (N)`� ` 15.0 • . 0.350 0.32 2.0 none Bug Screen New Right (VV) 32.5 ;' 0.350 0.32 none none Bug Screen New Right (IM _ 51.4 r 0.350 0.32 2.0 none Bug Screen New Right (Viq 15.0 0.350 0.32 10.0 none Bug Screen New HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. HeatingMin. Eff CoolingMin. Eff Thermostat Status 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New. 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New 1 Split Heat Pump 10.55 HSPF Split Heat Pump 2 1. 0 SEER Setback New HVAC DISTRIBUTION Location HeatingCoolingDuct Duct Location R-Value Status liv , - Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New , sleep Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 New loft Ductless / with Fan Ductless n/a n/a New WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status 1 Large Gas 75 0.80 Recirc/Time+Temp New Energ Pro 5.1 b Ener Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: rage 1 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential Part 1 of 5 CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 Project Address La Quinta California Energy Climate Zone CA Climate Zone 15 Total Cond. Floor Area 3,216 Addition n/a # of Stories 2 FIELD INSPECTION ENERGY CHECKLIST IZI Yes ❑ No HERS Measures -- If Yes, A CF-4R must be provided per Part 2 of 5 of this form. ❑ Yes ❑ No Special Features -- If Yes, see Part 2 of 5 of this form for details. INSULATION Area Special Construction Type Cavity (fe) Features (see Part 2 of 5) Status FENESTRATION U- Exterior Orientation Area(e) � Factor SHGC Overhang Sidefins ' Shades Status Left (E) 29.3 0.330 0.34 none none Bug Screen ' New Left (E) �68.0 0.350 ,_0.32- none- q .,,,—..wnone Bug.Screenp,.r.� ,, New Right 33.04(;; 0.340-r0:3rr2e 8.0 . r' none ,; -Bug ScreeFn" New /�Y y ,S F HVAC SYSTEMS Qty. Heating Min. Eff Cooling Min. Eff Thermostat Status HVAC DISTRIBUTION '. Duct Location Heating Cooling Duct Location R-Value Status WATER HEATING Qty. Type Gallons Min. Eff Distribution Status Energ Pro 5.1 by Energ Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 2 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc , • ► PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 2 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family , ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 SPECIAL FEATURES INSPECTION CHECKLIST The enforcement agency should pay special attention to the items specified in this checklist. These items require special written justification and documentation, and special verification to be used with the performance approach. The enforcement agency determines the adequacy of the justification, and may reject a building or design that otherwise complies based on the adequacy of the special justification and documentation submitted. Compliance for all orientations is specified, see section 151 (c) 2 of the Standards and section RA1-3.3 in Appendix RA-1 of the Residential Compliance Manual. The DHW System Bradford White M-2-XR75S6BN is a non-NAECA large storage gas water heater. Verify DHW details. A hot water recirculation systems has been modeled. Verification of type is required. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic Reflectance = 0.42, Emittance = 0.88 shall be rated and labeled by the Cool Roof Rating Council in accordance with Section 10-113 of the standards. The Roof R-38 Roof Attic includes credit for a Radiant Barrier that is Continuous meeting eligibility and installation criteria as specified in Residential Appendix RA4.2.2. _F 'S:r;. sari HERS,'REQUIR.ED VERIFICATIONt,f ..:: '}... .1y. 'e._ . -e..�' rc..,. y<• + J s -F•"• `i'd ��.,.r �J.,,. Items in•thls sectiorf require?fieId testing a /or verifjcation.by a�certfied°HERS Rater"`TheInspector-must receive a completed CF-4R form for each of the measures listed below for final to be given. The Cooling System -Trane TUD1B080A9481A/4TTR3042A1 includes credit fora 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System liv includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. t The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System liv incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is required to verify that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. The Cooling System Trane TUD1B080A9481A/4TTR3042A1 includes credit for a 12.0 EER Condenser. A certified HERS rater must field verify the installation of the correct Condenser. The HVAC System sleep includes credit for Verified Fan Energy. Measured Fan Energy may not exceed 0.58 w/cfm. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS Verified Refrigerant Charge or a Charge Indicator Display. Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is required. The HVAC System sleep incorporates HERS verified Duct Leakage. HERS field verification and diagnostic testing is reauired to verifv that duct leakage meets the specified criteria. • Fairm Schl the The Cooling System Fujitsu 12RLQ includes credit for a 12.5 EER Condenser. A certified HER,< GHAENterPrises Condenser. Eiertmaicai lly Signeei at CafamwSxi Compliance credit for quality installation of insulation has been used. HERS field verification is reffM12010 Ener Pro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 3 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE: Residential (Part 3 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone Date Mandarina Plan 2 Loft ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration 811112010 ANNUAL ENERGY USE SUMMARY Standard Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin Facing Margin TDV kBtU/ft2 r North East South • West Space Heating 2.40 2.36 0.03 2.61 -0.21 2.52 -0.12 2.37 0.03 Space Cooling 61.01 51.32 9.69 51.51 9.50 50.80 10.21 51.22 9.79 Fans 12.40 11.89 0.51 11.91 0.49 11.82 0.57 11.83 0.57 Domestic Hot Water 10.68 14.75 -4.07 14.75 -4.07 14.75 -4.07 14.75 -4.07 Pumps 0.00 0.17 -0.17 0.17 -0.17 0.17 -0.17 0.17 -0.17 Totals 86.48 80.50 5.98 80.95 5.53 80.06 6.42 - 80.35 6.13 Percent Better Than Standard: 6.9 % 6.4 % 7.4 % 7.1 % BUILDING COMPLIES - HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED Fenestration Building Front Orientation: All Four Orientations Ext. Walls/Roof Wall Area Area Number of Dwelling Units: 1.00 (N) 962 148 Fuel Available at Site: Natural Gas (E) 822 97 Raised Floor Area: 0 (S) 692 140 Slab on Grade Area: 2,918 (M 792 172 Average Ceiling Height: 9.8 Roof 3,216 . 0 Fenestration Average U-Factor: 0.35 TOTAL: 558 Average SHGC: 0.32 Fenestration/CFA Ratio: 17.3 % REMARKS THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT. (CEC Blueprint #60) A t �•iZ� 5�++"�C�t.�,-y,7 �.�,._ 4� e4'� ....-r 's - �, •. r STATEMENT'OF COMPLIANCE This certificate of compliance'lists the building features and specifications needed to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 the Administrative Regulations and Part 6 the Efficiency Standards of the California Code of Regulations. The documentation author hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author - 1�� A� , Gallant Energy Consulting Company. 811112010 Address 508 WMission Ave Ste 201 Name Mark Gallant, CEPE City/State/ZipCity/State/Zip Escondido, CA 92025 Phone 760-743-5408 Signed Date The individual with overall design responsibility hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of construction documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any other calculations submitted with this permit application, and recognizes that compliance using duct design, duct sealing, verification of refrigerant charge, insulation installation quality, and building envelope sealing require installer testing and certification and field verification by an approved HERS rater. Designer or Owner (per Business & Professions Code) Company SL Farms Inc - Address 30-875 Date Palm Dr #C Name City/State/Zip Cathedral City, CA 92234 Phone 760-250-8611 Signed License # Date EnergyPro 5.1 by EnenqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 4 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 1811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area u- Factor Insulation Azm I Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interior Frame Wall 115 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 360 0.095 R-15 270 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Roof 1,350 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 liv Slab 1,350 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A1 liv Wall 260 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 liv Wall 45 0.095 R-15 01 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 161 0.095 R-15 270 90 New. 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 140 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Wall 606 0.095 R-15 90 90 New - 4.3.1-A4 sleep Roof 1,568 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 sleep Slab 1,568 0.730 None 0 180 New 4.4.7-A 1 sleep Wall 229 0.095 R-15 0 90 New 4.3.1-A4 sleep Door 21 0.500 None 0 90 New 4.5.1-A4 sleep Wall 144 0.095 R-15 0 90 1 New 14.3.1-A4 loft Wall 99 0.095 R-15 1 1 2701 90 1 New 14.3.1-A4 loft FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 1 Window 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 2 Window 24.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 3 Window 10.5 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv 4 Window 40.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 5 Window, ,, 40.0 0.350 NFRC T0.32 NFRC_ _, _ .___ r--10 New_ ___-.. NonMeta1Lowe2 OP _. liv • 6 Window; '` 10.0 0.330 NFRC ,,..( -,.-,0.34',NFRC '" � =270 N&w. Ct,,-) NonMetal Lowe2 FX. X lji liv 7 Window`" 110.0 0.330 NFRC% . r'0.34 (NFRC s, 270 New I J NonMetal,1owe2 FX: ' liv 8 Window 4.0 !ZO.'MOI NFRC,^ 0.34 NFRC x ° �4270 New,.,;:.NonMetal Lowe2 FX liv N 9 Windbw 4l0 $0.330 NFRC ,.'; 0.34 NFRC• .. t':270 New T . NonMetal Lowe2 FX k ;, . liva. 10 Window ,t �12.5; J,0,350, NFRC f } 0.32 NFRC, i ,M 'New;,,.:(" NonMetal Lowe2 OP. TP' A. /wm `�`� ,ilk" �► 11 Window:o' If V0.0 ,' 0 350 NFRC-I*. m .632 NFRC r 42,'180 New, , NonMetal Lowe2 12 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC -"t, , f 0.32 NFRC'' - ' 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 13 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC _ 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 14 Window" 25.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP liv 15 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 16 Window 12.5 0.350 1 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep (1) U-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-13 = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Right Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt REA Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 1 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 3.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3 Bug Screen 0.76 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4 Bug Screen 0.76 5 Bug Screen 0.76 6 Bug Screen 0.76 7 Bug Screen 0.76 8 Bug Screen 0.76 9 Buq Screen 0.76 10 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 2.5 ' 16.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 11 Bug Screen 0.76 12 Bug Screen 0.76 13 Bug Screen 0.76 14 Bug Screen 0.76 15 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 16 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by Ener Soft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 5 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc I CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interiorl Frame Wall 152 0.095 R-15 180 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft Wall 119 0.095 R-15 90 90 New 4.3.1-A4 loft Roof 298 0.025 R-38 0 0 New 4.2.1-A21 loft FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC2 Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 17 Window 30.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 18 Window 21.4 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 19 Window 15.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 20 Window 12.5 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 180 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 21 Window_t_, _ . 25.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32. NFRC _ _ 180 New ,., NonMeta(Lowe2 sleep 22 Windo`w'. 'N12.5 0.350 °NFRC r# �r'0.32 NFRC :j _+`�180 New , 'I NonMetal Lowe2 OP .,A( `sleep 23 Window. ' `4.0 0.330 'NFRC'+ 90 New , f r NonMetal,,Lowe2 FX . " :_ * sleep 24 - Window 4. Q �Z0.330, NFRC' "'j ' 0.34 NFRC:{..4. 90 News.;,;Ar-, NonMetal Lowe2 FX It- sleep: 25 Window 200 tO.136 NFRC ; t 0.34 NFRC w-, '" 90 New ..z",' NonMetal Lowe2 FX "; sleep ;,,M� 26 Window Ji ,0 8.0JY0.350 NFRC- 1 0.32 NFRC r. ,$90 New;;r' -7 NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep Wit• #� " 27 Window . , .. t420.0 41c0.350 NFRiN 0.32 NFRC � Zo'90 New.* '►; NonMetal Lowe2 28 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC " t$° 0.32 NFRC `= 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP sleep 29 Window 8.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 0 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft =30,. Window ' 33.0 0.340 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 PDR loft 31 Window 20.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 270 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft 32 Window 16.0 , 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft (1) Ll-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value , (2) SHGC Type: 116-B = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Ri ht Fin H t Wd Len H t LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 17 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 6.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 18 Bug Screen 0.76 8.0 2.7 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 19 Bug Screen 0.76 5.0 3.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 20 Bug Screen 0.76 21 Bug Screen 0.76 22 Bug Screen 0.76 23 Bug Screen 0.76 24 Bug Screen 0.76 25 Bug Screen 0.76 26 Bug Screen 0.76 27 Bug Screen .0.76 28 Bug Screen 0.76 29 Bug Screen 0.76 30 Bug Screen 0.76 6.7 5.0 8.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 31 Bug Screen 0.76 32 IBug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 6 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 4 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type .0 Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 OPAQUE SURFACE DETAILS Surface Type Area U- Factor Insulation Azm Tilt Status Joint Appendix 4 Location/Comments Cavity Exterior Frame Interior Frame FENESTRATION SURFACE DETAILS ID Type Area U-Factor SHGC Azm Status Glazing Type Location/Comments 33 Window 16.0 0.350 NFRC 0.32 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 OP loft 34 Window 1.3 0.330 NFRC 0.34 NFRC 90 New NonMetal Lowe2 FX loft f. } '- „� ' �'i #� _�i 4•. « r'ifH�.v t• _E �[ .i 7 Y:� aUG-.��f� �1�.+r'%p it �s��;�--b;' ��' yrt'4 �^`+.,� ,.. �.:: Tawr `;.� .� 1„!',%n� �"•9�'14�.'^ 7dCT ?� 7 (1) U-Factor Type: 116-A = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value (2) SHGC Type: 116-13 = Default Table from Standards, NFRC = Labeled Value EXTERIOR SHADING DETAILS ID Exterior Shade Type SHGC Window Ove hang Left Fin Ri ht Fin. Hqlt Wd Len H qqt LExt RExt Dist Len H t Dist Len H t 33 Bug Screen 0.76 34 Bug Screen 0.76 EnergyPro 5.1 by EnergySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 7 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 -Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider: Ca10ERTS, Inc L r CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: Residential (Part 5 of 5) CF-1 R Project Name Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Building Type m Single Family ❑ Addition Alone ❑ Multi Family ❑ Existing+ Addition/Alteration Date 811112010 BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION System Name Zone Name Floor Area ft Volume Year Built New Existinq Altered Removed liv liv 1,350 13,500 sleep sleep 1,568 15,680 loft loft 298 2,384 Totals 1 3,2161 01 01 0 HVAC SYSTEMS System Name Qt : Heating Type Min. Eff. Cooling Type Min. Eff. Thermostat Type Status liv 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New sleep 1 Central Furnace 80% AFUE Split Air Conditioner 14.0 SEER Setback New loft _ +y 1 -Split HeaFPuihp'" 10.55,HSP,F Split- Heat=P,ump� -21.0-SEER,Setback, New r 117 .�. fry -.[ .I-•'t � ;fC r .�-... ��-t.� .+rT: �._.� i��, (�i`,. �' 3C"� �-. HVAC r DISTRIBUTION „ .�: ,r- lz : , }---'' •- F ,..�'^ #a ' i',f�' Iat r A�t�;- ,= s t.'".'�"' System Name 't"-H'eatin'g _. 600linq r ,.s- Duct Location Duct; ' R-Value Ducts�g Tested? Status liv ,.r ., Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 0 New sleep - Ducted Ducted Attic, Ceiling Ins, vented 6.0 0 New loft Ductless / with Fan Ductless n/a n/a ❑ New WATER HEATING SYSTEMS System Name a' Qty. Type Distribution Rated Input Btuh Tank Cap. F al Energy Factor or RE Standby Loss or Pilot' Ext. Tank Insul. R Value r Status Bradford White M-2-XR75 1 Large Gas Recirc/Time+Temp 76,000 75 0.80 2.00 % 12.0 New t • MULTI -FAMILY WATER HEATING DETAILS HYDRONIC HEATING SYSTEM PIPING Control E w a Hot Water Piping Length ft o 20 Q c System Name Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Insul. Thick. Qt . HP Plenum Outside Buried ❑ '❑ EnergyPro 5.1 by EnerqySoft User Number: 2875 RunCode: 2010-06-09T10:25:4 ID: Page 8 of 8 Reg: 210-N0012957A-000000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2010/08/11 15:58:01 HERS PRovider:rCa10ERTS, Inc Ca1CFRTS - CF-1R Builder Sign -Off Page 1 of 1 r Pat M Schlicht Logged In CP1R CF-iR Builder Sign -Off: Home Project Please select the CF-1R you wish to Sign -Off on. CF-1R for Builders ID Name Uploaded Company Project CEC By Registration My Installers Gallant My Signature 96891 Mandarina Plan 2 Loft Mark Gallant Energy Bin for CF-1R 210-NO012957A Agreements Consulting Mark Gallant Bin for My Info 96889 Mandarina Plan 2 Gallant Energy CF-1R 210-NO012955A Customer Info Consulting website updates 96886 Mandarina Plan 1 Loft Mark Gallant Gallant Energy Bin for CF-1R 210-NO012954A Consulting Log Out 96885 Mandarina Plan 1 Mark Gallant Energy Bin for 210-NO012952A Gallant Consulting CF-1R Mark Gallant Bin for 96882 Mandarina Casita Gallant Energy CF-1R 210-NO012951A Consulting To HIDE previously Approved CF-1R's, [CLICK HERE]. Multi -Process Copyright © 2010 CaICERTS, Inc. All rights reserved. Revised: January 11, 2010 GHA [Terms and Conditions] [Privacy Statement] Enterprises -Approved- -Approved- -Approved- -Approved- -Approved- CaICERTS, Inc. 31 Natoma St Suite 120 Folsom, CA 95630 Office: 916-985-3400 Toll Free: 877-HERS-RBR (877-437-7787) Fax: 916-985-3402 E-Mail: info@calcerts.com https://www.calcerts.com/builder—request—signoff.cftn?showall=l 8/12/2010