David Taussig & Associates, Inc.REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: David Taussig & Associates, Inc.
Reviewer: � � \%( n
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: /Q _2 2 / �
Understanding and Approach
25
7 25
Experience
25
20
Scope of Work /
30
2
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
S
Tota l
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation) —3�O
(.,)1; i, (T i /Yl C1. V,
Comments:.
/ r
- -r, ?( .1 a 5
V z, 1, i
- v d -�— A/Grl IU5 /M
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: David Taussig & Associates, Inc.
Reviewer:, Date: 3 v
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
�.
Experience
25
2—
Scope of Work
30
Z S
Presentation
5
z--
Format
5
3
Unique Qualities
10
S
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments: tf Pe4 lr,d-c
y LC -6 0.D-�"
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: David Taussig & Associates, Inc.
Reviewer:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: /0 ~ Z Y—• /g
Understanding and Approach
25
Experience
25
Scope of Work
30
Presentation
5
—
Format
5
Z.
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
Comments!-
*
<1.Ml1 K t
Ah
I I r I v- L~
0
UG7/f1 r • �'s C
F
r
SeS
�r
n c,,/,,/—
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials
Date
M.o 4-ka*-,_ ;2-0 ers j Fc>t%4- Y t, rj s,& 11, Re fe^4`d
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.