Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Economic and Planning Systems,
Inc.
Reviewer: :err 1 Dntec
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
Experience
25
rD
Scope of Work
30
23
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
J
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
t
(Explanation)
Comments: yy ��L ��r �5f `�� �/1 i �4 A
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
'2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.
Reviewer: _D°1in ^ 1 C*4 4-1^0 Date:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
2 l
Experience
25
29
Scope of Work
30
25
Presentation
5
3
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments: G64-1',e s ' 1041.
e 4-
- Gc $--oA — A- .c 44.,
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Economic and Planning Systems. Inc._
Reviewer: ?V u14 A) 1jcY1n!S(pn
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: /0 - 2 Z — f�y
a
Understanding and Approach
25
1-5
Experience
25
020
Scope of Work
30
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation) Pi n V Ld,2d Q
W a/ n G it 1 A4 of--
r► . J w �O{O
S
!/
TOTAL16
Reviewer's Signature
n AA-Ajnnr-11
Contract Administrator's Initials Date /0
- 2 Z---/�
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and. subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.