Matrix Consulting GroupREQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Matrix Consulting Group
Reviewer: Date:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
/ 7
Experience
25
1-5—
Scope of Work
30
2 1
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
Total
10
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation) Velt � ' ' -J r L�, G[ U Ice y C
r r 4
Co ments: Alcl� � la✓1 , .E� ��.,�. i� �) f�llslrri���
I' rf
�77711,
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Matrix Consulting Group
Reviewer: 7D 4`"1 ^ `�l
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: 10 *:�-> o c
Understanding and Approach
25
Z 7;;,
Experience
25
2-7—
Scope of Work
30
Z5
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
�A
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments: !� M,e Ll- %, � ofp s� .t— E-.� Cam << L 1 A ,r.' I (�.
— S h 4- - w��r c► ..el .
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Matrix Consulting Group
Reviewer: r 1 i -5 L Date:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
010
Experience
25
Scope of Work
30
CX
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
-7?
(Explanation) 5 1F► o- e
Comments: SOL •500
a' e 0
Lev,
f 15me=11—,4CCS)
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature ► LLt
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience,- but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list -includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.