NBSREQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: NBS
r
Reviewer:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date:
Understanding and Approach
Experience
25
Z Z
25
z Z
Scope of Work
30
261
Presentation
5
Format
5
_
Unique Qualities
10
5---
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments:
2
ll
5
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: NBS
Reviewer: l J 4.6 4 &.i Gas �- D
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: 1 42
Understanding and Approach
25
Experience
25
z3
Scope of Work
30
2
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments: c1� �••c�io s �„�� <.+!•e-G4- !-na(7 s,s}� re.C•a C)AI7�3
S t. �.t a� +L ( j� o � V � 4 Imo` u n S tr v � ce. d c�q a►e c j .
-- a s� • pra) -,r�+- L t, v A,rn .V`,-b-,-4
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: NBS
Reviewer: 6116k Ahe l erSCon Date: 10-ol-M-Itf
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
CIO
Experience
25
Scope of Work
30
.2.5
Presentation
5
S
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)_
prts ��
Comments:
--.
9
i S rs 6 ( ,1j 1,]6S - %3C)3e c.4..P
"�►►t L n L 1 r- i4�.4[J. J O
6eaeex&�l L-
PC)OW (� , n�A ,
`rJ fl C r� C,6a,4 w."s
TOTAL
Reviewer's. Signature n ► L
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.