Willdan Financial ServicesREQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Willdan Financial Services
Reviewer. ,C Date:
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Understanding and Approach
25
211-/
Experience
25
fir(
Scope of Work
30
2
Presentation
5
5
Format
5
5"
Unique Qualities
10
cj
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation) �er(L fr✓u'ji r; J %f
ents: 6-rfe /A 7e: ,r..G
Irrvf•�. s
L UCrSl
�r4-
?, 40 roe
v ,_,f
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18725: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Willdan Financial Services
Reviewer: �?
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: 10 L-5 6 /(�
Understanding and Approach
25
22
Experience
25
Scope of Work
30
?
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)
Comments: �,r �.'r-N► — S e. crt (, t�S t „ v �' lr G Sc na n q j
(�r�� 1� � 1' --� e,'}; �� +ham y �� cl -t`ti..G� � ��e.. (. � �.es�-� �,�...p��- �.�-. ��.►d��J�,p
^ ! �' i h r C ❑ rb�1 c-4+ S e .sS G1
TOTAL
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPSAL EVALUATION
Development Impact Fee Study
Consultant: Willdan Financial Services
Reviewer: IVI
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Date: ZO —C2:P — /15
Understanding and Approach
25
Experience
25
Sco a of Work
30
-210
Presentation
5
Format
5
Unique Qualities
10
Total
100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles): y�-%I V2�
5k
1�16 rah
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Understanding of work to be done - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-18 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
18-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-19 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or
similar.
20-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Presentation - 5 Points Maximum
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) -10 points maximum
Format/Organization - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.