The URL can be used to link to this page

2019 02 19 Council CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2019, at 4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The City Council values your comments; however in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION - NONE ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2019 7 2. EXCUSE ABSENCE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONER LOPEZ FROM THE FEBRUARY 13, 2019 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING 19 City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City’s web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 2 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 3.AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ATTEND CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 19-21, 2019 21 4. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 578 ON SECOND READING AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLES 1 AND 3 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR INCREASED FINES RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW 23 5. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2018 31 6. RECEIVE AND FILE SECOND QUARTER 2018/19 TREASURY REPORTS FOR OCTOBER, NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2018 35 7. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JANUARY 25, AND FEBRUARY 1, 2019 71 8. AUTHORIZE PURCHASES WITH PALMS TO PINES PRINTING FOR UP TO $80,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 89 9. APPROVE DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT 91 10. AWARD CONTRACT TO HARDY & HARPER, INC FOR AVENIDA BERMUDAS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATED ON AVENIDA BERMUDAS AT CALLE NOGALES AND CALLE MADRID, (PROJECT NO. 2018-02), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECT NO. 4.LQ.32-18) 97 11. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE JEFFERSON STREET SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 50 AND DEREK ALAN DRIVE (PROJECT NO. 2017- 06) 103 BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY NOMINATIONS 107 2.APPROVE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ECONOLITE SYSTEMS, INC TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL THE CENTRACS ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO MANAGE THE CITY’S SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 111 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 3 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS POSSIBLE MOTORIZED SCOOTER OPERATIONS 151 2. DISCUSS THE CITY’S RECYCLING EFFORTS/INITIATIVES 175 3. DISCUSS THE CITY’S PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPES 177 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 (SP 2008- 085, AMENDMENT 1) TO REVISE NORTHERN PORTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; CEQA: CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2018- 0005; AND ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION [RESOLUTION NO. 2019-002] 185 For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to City Council before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY RESOURCES – PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM OUTREACH AND SURVEY 361 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT A. MADISON STREET WIDENING UPDATE 363 B. MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2019 367 6. FACILITIES – MONTHLY DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2019 371 7. FINANCE MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Radi) 9. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (Fitzpatrick) 10. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick and Radi) 11. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Peña) 12. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFO EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 14. SILVERROCK EVENT SITE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Peña and Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Peña) 17. EAST VALLEY COALITION (Peña) 18. CVAG VALLEY-WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Peña) 19. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Peña) 20. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Radi) 21. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Radi) 22. CITYWIDE SECURITY CAMERAS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Radi) 23. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Radi and Sanchez) 24. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 25. COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (Sanchez) 26. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – GOVERNANCE, TRANSPARENCY AND LABOR POLICY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 27. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on March 5, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 FEBRUARY 19, 2019 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk, of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chambers at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on February 15, 2019. DATED: February 15, 2019 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices  The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777- 7092, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made.  If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the City Council, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (760) 777-7092. A one (1) week notice is required.  If background material is to be presented to the Councilmembers during a City Council meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting.  Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Community Development counter at City Hall located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2019 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER: Stephan Johnson, La Quinta – said he reported to the City a garage conversion into a living space in the La Quinta Cove that does not meet the City’s zoning and setback requirements in October 2018, which is currently under code compliance investigation, but has not yet been addressed; and expressed concerns about Staffs’ demeanor in handling his inquiries. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA City Manager Spevacek requested to make an additional announcement under Announcements, Presentations, and Written Communications section of the agenda. Councilmember Radi requested that Consent Calendar Item No. 9 be pulled for presentation of the staff report, comments, and a separate vote. City Clerk Radeva said Consent Calendar Item No. 1 – Council minutes dated December 18, 2018, will be amended on page 12 of the minutes and page 18 of the agenda packet to accurately reflect that Mayor Evans attended the Holiday Open House held by Senator Jeff Stone on December 12th not the 14th, at the District Office in Indio not the Southwest Office in Murrieta. Council concurred. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (QUARTERLY REVIEW) PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957, COUNCIL APPOINTED POSITION – CITY MANAGER COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3:12 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:04 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported no actions were taken in Closed Session that require reporting pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1 (Brown Act). PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Peña led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA The following PUBLIC SPEAKERS provided comments regarding Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) operations; inquired about the timeframe for issuing STVR permits; spoke about the importance of implementing and enforcing checks-and-balances to monitor and ensure compliance with the City’s code; asked for clarification on the City’s “three strikes” policy; suggested the City consider restricting STVRs only to owner-occupied properties; expressed concerns about lack of follow-up from the City on reported violations, excess occupancy and illegal conversions, STVR hotline, and particularly about the STVR and special event activities occurring at Morrow Ranch in PGA West and the disturbances they cause to the surrounding residential community, specifically with noise, lighting, traffic and parking congestions, and excess occupancy; and asked the City to partner with on-going homeowners’ associations, committees, and various residents’ efforts to resolve existing issues and ensure the integrity of the community:  Penni Sturgill, La Quinta  Barbara Montavon, La Quinta  Jim Cox, La Quinta  Larry Robinson, La Quinta  Deborah Brill, La Quinta 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. CITY STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS City Manager Spevacek said Account Technician Bernice Choo with the Finance Department and Administrative Assistant Lori Lorett with the Design and Development Department have joined Team La Quinta; and former Senior Planner Cheri Flores has been appointed in the capacity of Planning Manager. 2. LEADERSHIP INVESTMENT AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING (LINKS) - CITY OA LA QUINTA ACADEMY RECOGNITION Mayor Evans explained the City’s LINKS program, and jointly with Council presented to the following eight City employees with certificate of completion in the program: Employee Name and Title Department  Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant Finance  Carley Escarrega, Management Assistant Design & Development  Christina Gamez, Administrative Technician Community Resources  Armando Magallon, Permit Technician Design & Development  Alex Rodriguez, Parks Maintenance Worker Facilities  Jamie Torres, Management Assistant Community Resources  Jose Villalta, Traffic Signal Technician Design & Development  Wanda Wise-Latta, Executive Assistant Design & Development CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE MINUTES DATED DECEMBER 18, 2018 2. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 577 ON SECOND READING AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLES 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, AND 13 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO STREAMLINE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND STANDARDS 3. EXCUSE ABSENCES FOR HOUSING COMMISSIONER DAVIDSON FROM THE DECEMBER 12, 2018 HOUSING COMMISSION MEETING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER WYLER FROM THE JANUARY 14, 2019 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 4. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR CITY CLERK, MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO ATTEND LASERFICHE EMPOWER 2019 CONFERENCE IN LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 5-8, 2019 5.AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR ONE COUNCILMEMBER TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES GOVERNANCE, TRANSPARENCY AND LABOR POLICY COMMITTEE MEETINGS IN SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, JANUARY 18 AND JUNE 14, 2019 6. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR MARKETING MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR TO ATTEND 2019 VISIT CALIFORNIA OUTLOOK FORUM IN RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 10-13, 2019 7. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR ONE COUNCILMEMBER AND ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER TO ATTEND CITY LAUNCH 2019 CONFERENCE IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 10-12, 2019 8. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR FOUR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING MANAGER TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ACADEMY IN LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 6-8, 2019 9.pulled by Councilmember Radi for presentation of the staff report, comments, and a separate vote >>> ACCEPT LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATED AT THE ADAMS PARK RETENTION BASIN AND QUINTERRA DEVELOPMENT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MILES AVENUE, BETWEEN ADAMS STREET AND LOS MANOS DRIVE (PROJECT NO. 2016-03) 10. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED DECEMBER 14, 21, 2018 AND JANUARY 4, 2019 11. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 2018 12. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE THE SILVERROCK VENUE SITE CONSTRUCTION FOR BID (PROJECT NO. 2016-08) 10 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 – COUNCIL MINUTES DATED DECEMBER 18, 2018 – page 12 (or page 18 of the Agenda Packet), second paragraph from the bottom, shall be amended to read as follows: “Mayor Evans said she attended the Holiday Open House held by Senator Jeff Stone on December 12, at the Senator’s District Office in Indio and represented La Quinta.” CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 12 Mayor Evans said Council is approving the plans, specification, engineer’s estimate, and the advertisement for bids for this project, which is to build an event venue site at SilverRock Resort, similar to the Civic Center Campus, but larger in size. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Peña/Radi to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 – 8 and 10 – 12, as amended, with Item No. 2 adopting Ordinance No. 577. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 – pulled by Councilmember Radi for presentation of the staff report, comments, and a separate vote. City Engineer McKinney presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the continuous desert-scape landscape improvements throughout the City that have been ongoing since 2014 and were initiated to achieve water conservation due to the drought; turf to desert-scape conversions consisting of rock and gravel on the south, north, and east sides of the outside perimeter of the Adams Park retention basin; maintaining the turf and constructing approximately a quarter-mile walking path on the west side of the retention basin making access to the retention basin safer and more accessible, as well as planting new turf at the bottom of the basin; allowing adequate growing period for new turf is standard for landscape improvement projects; and no other changes have been made to Adams Park. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9, as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. 11 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 BUSINESS SESSION 1. RECEIVE AND FILE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 Finance Director Campos presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office, and introduced Manager Lauryn Stapleton with Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP (VTD), the City’s independent external auditor, who reported a summary of the audit findings and noted at the top of page 2 of the CAFR under the Opinions paragraph, the language is indicative of unmodified or a clean audit opinion by VTD. Council discussed the importance to maintain operational flexibility through the unassigned reserves fund which gives the City the ability to respond to unanticipated expenses and/or revenue reductions, and to allocate funds to pay-down existing unfunded liabilities; SilverRock enterprise fund loan repayment obligation to the General Fund stemming from the need for capital improvements and/or deficits resulting from operational expenses early on because the golf course was new, the need to repair various golf holes due to damage caused by heavy rains, repairing leaking lake liners, operational expenses due to the canal realignment initiated by the Coachella Valley Water District, and the golf course realignment of hole 18 to accommodate the Montage hotel development; establishing a strategy to repay the SilverRock enterprise fund loan obligation to the General Fund, which will be scheduled for Council consideration in the spring of 2019, based on an analysis of the potential value of the golf course when it becomes private and evaluating options to use the property tax revenue the City will receive to repay the loan; the Riverside County Assessor will determine the value of the golf course for property tax purposes; the process of depreciating the SilverRock Resort asset, as referenced in the CAFR, in accordance with the Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement between the City and SilverRock Development Company; the City’s unemployment rate as reported in the CAFR. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Fitzpatrick to receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 2018, as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. 12 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 2. APPROVE MEASURE G COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Financial Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Staff and Council commended the City’s Financial Advisory Commission for their time and efforts in exercising oversight over Measure G revenues. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Radi/Peña to approve the annual Measure G Compliance Report for the 2017/18 fiscal year as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. 3. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH RANGWALA ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE AN AREA PLAN FOR THE HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR Design and Development Director Castro presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the scope of work Rangwala Associates would conduct, which would include an analysis of the existing 11 Specific Plans along the Highway 111 Corridor and how they would interact with the visioning and design of the Area Plan; schedule of performance; and total contract amount. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Kaizer Rangwala, AICP, Principal with Rangwala Associates, Woodland Hills – said Rangwala’s team is very excited about the opportunity to work with the City; understands the importance of the Highway 111 Corridor for La Quinta’s fiscal health; the team members’ experience and competencies are very well aligned with the scope of the project; a step in developing the Area Plan is to meet with the Planning Commission and Council to introduce Rangwala’s team, provide a forum for engagement, and seek input, which will be incorporated in the development of the Area Plan; a three- day charrette will be held in La Quinta, an intensive planning session where citizens and other interested community members share ideas, give feedback to the designers, and collaborate on the vision of the Highway 111 Corridor; and spoke about recent projects the firm has completed. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to approve an Agreement for Contract Services with Rangwala Associates, not to exceed $204,995, to prepare an Area Plan for the Highway 111 Corridor; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed unanimously. 13 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 4. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH INTELESYSONE INC. TO REPLACE THE CITY’S UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS AND VOIP PHONE SYSTEM Assistant to the City Manager Villalpando introduced Management Analyst Rodriguez who presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the new system will provide enhanced telephone units which can also be upgraded anytime during the five-year agreement, ability to send out emergency alerts, can integrate with Microsoft Office 365; a lease-to-own agreement includes annual maintenance for the equipment and system, and provides the City with the flexibility to evaluate the system and services should better technology becomes available during the term of the agreement; and implementation timeframe. Staff noted the agreement term will be from 2019 to 2024. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to approve an Agreement for Contract Services with IntelesysOne, Inc., not to exceed $168,007, to replace the City’s Unified Communications and VoIP phone system, as amended for a five-year term spanning from 2019 to 2024; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Evans asked the audience to join Council in a moment of silence in honor of the passing of Cathedral City Mayor Greg Pettis. 5. APPOINT ONE COUNCILMEMBER TO SERVE ON THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY FOR 2019 Council waive presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Sanchez to appoint Councilmember Radi as the City representative to serve on the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority for calendar year 2019. Motion passed unanimously. 14 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEMS UPDATE Community Resources Director Escobedo thanked Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Captain Reynolds and Assistant Police Chief Tapp, Battalion Chief, and Emergency Services Coordinator for their efforts and involvement with this program; and introduced Traffic Operations Analyst Gunterson, Public Safety Manager Mendez, and Public Safety Analyst Moreno who presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk’s Office. Council discussed the 90-day trial period is anticipated to be conducted from March to May 2019; the durability of the cameras to withstand the extreme desert heat; the three locations for this pilot program were selected because there is existing Ethernet connection to the network and the City would not incur connectivity costs at this time; the City’s fiber optics project, expected to be rolled-out in May, will allow additional areas to be included, such as parks and trailheads; Staff’s community outreach efforts are focused on the pilot program specifically, as well as providing general information and education on the entire project; conducting a survey following the pilot program would effectively gage and respond to the community’s feedback, concerns, and questions, and achieve greater community engagement; utilizing an outside agency to conduct a survey would cost between $22,000 and $30,000; Staff can achieve successful results by conducting the survey in-house; and this trial program is an opportunity to determine which system works best from technical standpoint in terms of clarity of footage, operational performance, and service responsiveness. Mayor Evans noted for the record that written comments in opposition to this program were received by an anonymous La Quinta resident, which were distributed to Council, incorporated into the record, and made available to the public. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Kay Wolf, La Quinta – said she has met with Staff and Council Members to discuss this program; expressed concerns about surveillance and civil rights, which deal with privacy, racial profiling, cultural bias, data sharing and protection, including protection with or from the public and immigration agencies; and provided comments on the proposed safety cameras policy. Council discussed the parameters and authority for data retention, deletion, and access; data disclosure in accordance with the California Public Records Act and related exemptions; data will be retained for year in accordance with the California Government Code; the Safety Camera Ad-hoc Committee 15 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 members have conducted community outreach for this pilot program; residents are encouraged and able to provide comments on the draft policy anytime during and after the pilot program; this program will not replace the City’s police force, but rather augment it, and improve the delivery of public safety; and the best time to conduct a survey to effectively engage and accurately gage the community’s response. Council reached a consensus and directed Staff to proceed with the 90-day pilot public safety cameras program; develop an outline of what extensive community outreach entails; and conduct a third-party survey following the program to gauge the community’s response. PUBLIC HEARINGS – None MAYOR EVANS SAID SHE HAS TO LEAVE TO REPRESENT THE CITY AT ANOTHER EVENT, ASKED MAYOR PRO TEM SANCHEZ TO ACT AS PRESIDING OFFICER FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING, AND LEFT THE DAIS AT 6:25 P.M. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS All reports are on file in the City Clerk’s Office. 4-A. COMMUNITY RESOURCES – BODY WORN CAMERAS Council asked what the next steps would be following the 90-day trial use of body worn camera; Staff said additional equipment will be acquired if needed and the process will follow the established policies and procedures as presented back on September 18, 2018. MAYOR’S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ITEMS Councilmember Fitzpatrick requested that Staff provide an update on the progress of La Quinta’ Creation Station Makerspace and how it has been received by the community. Councilmember Fitzpatrick commended Staff for organizing the Community Workshop held on Saturday, January 12, 2019, at the Wellness Center; and based on the community comments received regarding the Fritz Burns park with regards to water features and additional pickleball courts, the park should be evaluated holistically, in conjunction with the contemplated improvement for the City’s maintenance yard facility, to determine what would be the best use of the space and adequate parking is available. 16 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11 of 11 JANUARY 15, 2019 Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez said last weekend Mayor Evans and he attended SafeHouse of the Desert event, which was very well attended; the organization provides emergency shelter, intervention, and outreach services to youth in crisis; as well as Assemblyman Eduardo Garcia’s Open House. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez said he participated in a police ride-along on New Year’s Eve. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta’s representative for 2019, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organizations’ meetings:  COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) La Quinta’s representative for 2019, Councilmember Peña reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting:  CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE La Quinta’s representative for 2019, Councilmember Sanchez reported on his participation in the following organization’s meeting:  RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION  LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES – RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING (January 4, 2019 hosted by the City of Eastvale) ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Radi to adjourn at 6:34 p.m. Motion passed: ayes (4), noes (0), absent (1 – Evans). Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 17 18 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: EXCUSE ABSENCE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONER LOPEZ FROM THE FEBRUARY 13, 2019 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING RECOMMENDATION Excuse absence for Financial Advisory Commissioner Javier Lopez from the February 13, 2019 Financial Advisory Commission meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Commissioner Lopez requested to be excused from the February 13, 2019 Financial Advisory Commission meeting due to a conflicting professional business obligation. Commissioner Lopez has no absences for FY 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT No meeting attendance compensation is paid to absent members. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Municipal Code states: “If any member of a board, commission or committee absents him/herself from two consecutive regular meetings or absents him/herself from a total of three regular meetings within any fiscal year, his/her office shall become vacant and shall be filled as any other vacancy. A board, commission or committee member may request advance permission from the city council to be absent at one or more regular meetings due to extenuating circumstances, and/or may request the city council to excuse an absence after-the-fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted by the city council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above-stated limitations on absences.” ALTERNATIVES Council may deny this request, which would result in the absence being counted toward the Commissioner’s limitation on absences as noted above. Prepared by: Tania Flores, Interim Management Assistant Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 19 20 AGENDA TITLE: AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ATTEND CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 19 - 21, 2019 RECOMMENDATION Authorize overnight travel for City’s Building Official to attend the California Building Officials Annual Business Meeting in San Diego, California, March 19 - 21, 2019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •California Building Officials Annual Business Meeting (CALBO Conference) offers sessions on the building code, accessibility, and the latest technology applications to improve building department efficiencies. •The CALBO Conference is held once each year in different cities throughout the country; this year’s Conference will be in San Diego, California. •The Building Official would attend this year’s Conference. FISCAL IMPACT Estimated total expenses are $1,500, which includes registration, lodging and meals. Funds are available in the Building Department’s Travel and Training Budget (101-6003-60320). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The CALBO Conference is a three-day event focusing on a range of emerging issues, policies and best practices in building. Education sessions include: •Building Code updates •Building Department operations innovation and technology •Public and commercial building accessibility •Disaster declaration and recovery •Legislative updates. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT 21 ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to authorize this travel. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director 22 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 578 ON SECOND READING AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLES 1 AND 3 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR INCREASED FINES RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 578 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •On February 5, 2019, Council introduced Ordinance No. 578 for first reading to amend Sections of Titles 1 and 3 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. •This amendment provides additional language for increased fines to comply with state law. FISCAL IMPACT – None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Code amendments were adopted at the July 17, 2018 City Council meeting to allow for increased fines related to Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) violations and Special Event violations at STVR’s. The amendments to Sections of Title 1 Administrative Citations and Title 3 Short- Term Vacation Rentals include additional language to allow for the increased fines for STVR’s to comply with state law. ALTERNATIVES As Council approved this ordinance at first reading, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Nichole Romane, Interim Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 23 24 ORDINANCE NO. 578 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS OF TITLES 1 AND 3 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS WHEREAS, Titles 1 and 3 of the La Quinta Municipal Code relate to administrative citations and short-term vacation rentals respectively; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to regulate businesses operating within the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are necessary to clarify process and standards for maximum citation amount allowed by state law or City’s Code, among other related regulations, as more particularly set forth in this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The Sections of Titles 1 and 3 shall be amended as written in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would 25 Ordinance No. 578 Amendments to Sections 1.09.020 & 3.25.090 to Allow Increased Fines Related to STVR Adopted: February 19, 2019 Page 2 of 5 have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 19th day of February 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Fitzpatrick, Peña, Radi, Sanchez, Mayor Evans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None _______________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _______________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 26 Ordinance No. 578 Amendments to Sections 1.09.020 & 3.25.090 to Allow Increased Fines Related to STVR Adopted: February 19, 2019 Page 3 of 5 TITLE 1 CHANGES Chapter 1.09 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION 1.09.020 Authority and fines A. Any person or entity violating any provision of the La Quinta Municipal Code or applicable state law may be issued one or more administrative citations by an enforcement officer as provided in this chapter. A violation of this code includes, but is not limited to, all violations of the municipal code or other codes adopted by the city council, or failure to comply with any condition imposed by any entitlement, permit, agreement or environmental document issued or approved under the provisions of this code or any adopted code. B. Each and every day a violation of the municipal code or applicable state law exists constitutes a separate and distinct offense and shall be subject to citation. C. A civil fine shall be assessed by means of an administrative citation issued by an enforcement officer and shall be payable as instructed on the administrative citation. D. Fines shall be assessed in the amounts specified by ordinance of the city council, and, unless another amount for a fine applies in this code, shall not exceed the maximum amount allowed by state law or this section, in which the latter amount shall be as follows: 1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars for a first violation; 2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars for a second violation of the same ordinance or permit within one year from the date of the first violation; and 3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars for each additional violation of the same ordinance or permit within one year from the date of the first violation. (Ord. 564 § 1, 2017; Ord. 524 § 3, 2015; Ord. 379 § 1, 2002) EXHIBIT A 27 Ordinance No. 578 Amendments to Sections 1.09.020 & 3.25.090 to Allow Increased Fines Related to STVR Adopted: February 19, 2019 Page 4 of 5 TITLE 3 CHANGES Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 3.25.090 Violations A. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this chapter or this code by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative, shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. B. Permit Modification, Suspension and Revocation. A violation of any provision of this chapter, this code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including but not limited to applicable fire codes and the building and construction codes as set forth in Title 8 of this code, by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative, shall constitute grounds for modification, suspension and/or revocation of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. C. Notice of Violation. The city may issue a notice of violation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Section 1.01.300 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. D. Three Strikes Policy. Three violations of any provision of this chapter or this code within one year by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative, with respect to any one residential dwelling will result in an immediate suspension of the short-term vacation rental permit with subsequent ability to have a hearing before the City, pursuant to this chapter, to request a lifting of the suspension. E. Administrative and Misdemeanor Citations. The city may issue an administrative citation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citation) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from also issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. An administrative citation may impose a fine for one or more violations of this chapter in the maximum amount allowed by state law or this section, in which the latter amount shall be as follows: 1. General STVR violations (occupancy/noise/parking) - 28 Ordinance No. 578 Amendments to Sections 1.09.020 & 3.25.090 to Allow Increased Fines Related to STVR Adopted: February 19, 2019 Page 5 of 5 • First violation: $500.00; • Second violation: $1,000.00; • Third violation: $1,500.00. 2. Operating a STVR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit - • First violation: $1,000.00; • Second violation: $1,500.00; • Third violation: $2,000.00. 3. Hosting a special event at a STVR without a special event permit as required by Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code - • First violation: $5,000; • Second violation: $5,000.00. F. Public Nuisance. In addition to any and all rights and remedies available to the city, it shall be a public nuisance for any person to commit, cause or maintain a violation of this chapter, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1.01.250 (Violations public nuisances) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. 29 30 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 2018 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated December 31, 2018. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The report summarizes the City’s year-to-date (YTD) revenues and period expenditures for December 2018 (Attachment 1). •Revenue and expenditure reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget – represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2018 for fiscal year 2018/19. Current Total Budget – represents original adopted budgets plus any carryovers (typically associated with long-term Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) from the prior fiscal year) and any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year. Period Activity – represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity – represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used – represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 31 The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City’s cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. All funds are generally on target or under budget regarding expenditures. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Karla Campos, Finance Director Attachment 1: Revenue and Expenditure Report for December 31, 2018 MTD YTD YTD Percent of Budget General Fund 4,783,534$ 13,357,157$ 25.50% All Funds 8,892,553$ 24,478,376$ 16.66% MTD YTD YTD Percent of Budget General Fund 4,786,081$ 15,311,330$ 25.51% Payroll - General Fund 734,418$ 4,690,869$ 45.92% All Funds 7,514,088$ 47,829,300$ 28.82% December Revenues December Expenditures General Fund Non-General Fund Property Tax 2,000,250$ Transfers In - Capital Improvement (CIP) Fund(1)1,288,548$ Measure G Sales Tax 957,102$ Transfers In - Lighting & Landscape District 624,000$ Sales Tax 871,550$ SilverRock Greens Fees 280,468$ Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax 545,633$ Technology Support Internal Service Fund (3)270,225$ Building Plan Check Fees 47,051$ Insurance Internal Service Fund (3)230,650$ General Fund Non-General Fund Transfers Out (2)1,812,639$ Developer Reimbursements 400,000$ Sheriff Contract (September-October)1,106,595$ Transfers Out - Quimby to CIP 303,922$ Park Equipment Maintenance (4) 163,750$ SilverRock Maintenance 212,925$ Liability Insurance & Claims (4)114,650$ Capital Improvement Program (CIP)-Design(5)202,359$ Marketing and Tourism Promotions 64,364$ Transfers Out - Gas Tax to CIP 187,309$ (5) CIP Design: Calle Tampico drainage improvements; Dune Palms bridge; SRR event site; SRR infrastructure Phase II; Village Complete Streets. (2) Transfers out to Gas Tax Fund, Lighting and Landscape District, SilverRock, and the the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Fund as approved in the 2018/19 budget. Top Five Revenue/Income Sources for December Top Five Expenditures/Outlays for December (1) Transfers in to the Capital Improvement Fund are from General Fund, Quimby, Gas Tax, and Measure A sources. (3) Internal Service Funds are used to account for activites involved in rendering services to departments within the City; quarterly journal entries move revenue into these funds. (4) These charges in the General Fund represent quarterly contributions to the Internal Service Funds. 32 ATTACHMENT 1 For Fiscal: 2018/19 Period Ending: 12/31/2018 2/1/2019 Page 1 of 2 Revenue Summary Fiscal Activity Variance Favorable (Unfavorable)Fund Period Activity Current Total Budget Original Total Budget Percent Used 101 - GENERAL FUND 13,357,1574,783,53452,297,400 52,388,000 -39,030,843 25.50 % 201 - GAS TAX FUND 905,392315,5701,965,500 1,965,500 -1,060,108 46.06 % 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 1,149,2622892,333,000 2,333,000 -1,183,738 49.26 % 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G)200,067200,000200,000 200,000 67 100.03 % 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 0072,000 66,226 -66,226 0.00 % 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 73,7678,333100,100 100,100 -26,333 73.69 % 213 - JAG FUND 268000 268 0.00 % 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 636,876624,0001,586,100 1,586,100 -949,224 40.15 % 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -223000 -223 0.00 % 219 - ASSET FORFEITURE 0000 0 0.00 % 220 - QUIMBY FUND -3,5290367,000 367,000 -370,529 0.96 % 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 8,7242,74363,700 63,700 -54,976 13.70 % 223 - MEASURE A FUND 269,47180,209971,708 971,708 -702,237 27.73 % 224 - TUMF FUND -10000 -10 0.00 % 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND -160100100 -116 15.68 % 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 8,3729564,000 4,000 4,372 209.31 % 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 19,1536,830020,482,627 -20,463,474 0.09 % 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 13,10213,36351,500 51,500 -38,398 25.44 % 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 00012,005 -12,005 0.00 % 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 327,79624,477315,000 543,000 -215,204 60.37 % 243 - RDA Low-Mod Housing Fund -1,20908,000 18,000 -19,209 6.71 % 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014)00010,000 -10,000 0.00 % 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016)110,871030,000 170,000 -59,129 65.22 % 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 243,91836,946369,000 369,000 -125,082 66.10 % 251 - PARKS & REC DIF FUND 202,75226,624508,200 508,200 -305,448 39.90 % 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 72,22711,516110,000 110,000 -37,773 65.66 % 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 34,0564,47230,000 30,000 4,056 113.52 % 254 - COMMUNITY CENTER DIF 12,7241,67715,400 15,400 -2,676 82.63 % 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 14,0322,83115,000 15,000 -968 93.55 % 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 3,9615204,000 4,000 -39 99.03 % 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 33,2225,29440,000 40,000 -6,778 83.05 % 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 37,38634488,500 88,500 -51,114 42.24 % 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 1,9752,0002,100 2,100 -125 94.06 % 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND 860,811108,33100 860,811 0.00 % 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 3500671,600 671,600 -671,250 0.05 % 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 2,949,4721,399,35111,955,941 55,543,794 -52,594,321 5.31 % 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 453,841227,925923,700 923,700 -469,859 49.13 % 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 549,548271,4581,189,800 1,484,800 -935,252 37.01 % 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 325,389163,750675,000 675,000 -349,611 48.21 % 504 - INSURANCE FUND 460,054230,650923,600 923,600 -463,546 49.81 % 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 1,221,482432,8374,092,800 4,092,800 -2,871,318 29.84 % 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE -203070,000 70,000 -70,203 0.29 % 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN -100000 -100 0.00 % 761 - CERBT OPEB TRUST -73,815-94,27700 -73,815 0.00 % Report Total:8,892,553 24,478,37682,049,749 146,900,060 -122,421,683 16.66 % 33 For Fiscal: 2018/19 Period Ending: 12/31/2018 2/1/2019 Page 2 of 2 Expense Summary Fiscal Activity Variance Favorable (Unfavorable)Fund Period Activity Current Total Budget Original Total Budget Percent Used 101 - GENERAL FUND 15,311,3304,786,08151,153,413 60,027,028 44,715,699 25.51 % 201 - GAS TAX FUND 886,742347,1591,959,900 2,010,829 1,124,087 44.10 % 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 519,53122,5851,628,200 1,628,200 1,108,669 31.91 % 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 0072,000 66,226 66,226 0.00 % 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 00100,000 100,000 100,000 0.00 % 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 724,306153,7541,582,700 1,785,400 1,061,094 40.57 % 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 9,87914567,000 67,000 57,121 14.74 % 220 - QUIMBY FUND 384,694303,9223,956,000 5,748,488 5,363,794 6.69 % 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 33,61424,29235,000 35,000 1,386 96.04 % 223 - MEASURE A FUND 304,73295,107961,708 4,733,403 4,428,671 6.44 % 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 00028,571 28,571 0.00 % 227 - State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP)3,0133,01300 -3,013 0.00 % 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 004,000 4,000 4,000 0.00 % 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 12,947,699009,339,728 -3,607,971 138.63 % 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 672054,000 54,000 53,328 1.25 % 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 4,0000012,005 8,005 33.32 % 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 231,71138,240604,000 602,500 370,789 38.46 % 243 - RDA Low-Mod Housing Fund 00250,000 250,000 250,000 0.00 % 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014)892,54439,58101,451,947 559,403 61.47 % 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016)7,376,024007,416,000 39,976 99.46 % 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 410,157400,000400,000 2,557,460 2,147,304 16.04 % 251 - PARKS & REC DIF FUND 0002,405,952 2,405,952 0.00 % 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 60,75830,938110,000 115,952 55,194 52.40 % 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 13,4676,82330,000 35,952 22,485 37.46 % 254 - COMMUNITY CENTER DIF 000107,591 107,591 0.00 % 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 16,2798,28815,000 20,952 4,673 77.70 % 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 3,9661,3234,000 9,952 5,986 39.85 % 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 4,1492,07640,000 45,952 41,803 9.03 % 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 47,48324,055322,000 722,000 674,517 6.58 % 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 668,0380671,600 671,600 3,563 99.47 % 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 3,049,385376,14211,955,941 55,554,801 52,505,416 5.49 % 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 331,47152,037923,700 1,005,784 674,313 32.96 % 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 496,222210,8831,090,700 1,574,200 1,077,978 31.52 % 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 171,99539,548705,000 705,000 533,005 24.40 % 504 - INSURANCE FUND 735,5204,586921,100 918,500 182,980 80.08 % 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 2,126,884493,3094,090,800 4,091,000 1,964,116 51.99 % 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 50,20050,20050,200 50,200 0 100.00 % 760 - SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 12,833000 -12,833 0.00 % Report Total:7,514,088 47,829,30083,757,962 165,953,173 118,123,874 28.82 % 34 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE SECOND QUARTER 2018/19 TREASURY REPORTS FOR OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, AND DECEMBER 2018 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the second quarter fiscal year 2018/19 Treasury Reports for October, November, and December 2018. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commentary and Summary of Significant Activity The total book value of the portfolio decreased $309,295 from $129.87 million at the end of September to $129.56 million at the end of December. The variance reflects revenue, expenditure, and investment activities during the quarter. The market continued to react to the political climate and economic news, and staff worked with the City’s broker to capitalize on market conditions. The Investment Type October November December Max Allowed Bank Accounts 1.54% 2.58% 3.28% 85% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Housing 12.49% 12.61% 12.48% (1)(2) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) City 37.41% 36.20% 34.28% (1) Federal Agency Coupons 17.25% 17.41% 17.23% 30% Treasury Coupons 11.89% 11.22% 11.10% 100% Certificates of Deposit (CD's)14.09% 14.61% 15.60% 30% Corporate Notes 3.36% 3.39% 3.36% 10% Money Market Pool Accounts-CAMP (new)0.77% 0.78% 1.55% 20% Money Market with Fiscal Agent 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (2) Managed Pool Accounts-OPEB Trust 1.19% 1.20% 1.12% (3) Total 100% 100% 100% (2) Funds held by fiscal agent and the LAIF Housing funds are governed by bond indentures and not subject to City Investment Policy (3) OPEB trust is a fiduciary account and not subject to City Investment Policy Portfolio Allocations Percent of Portfolio (1) LAIF is subject to maximum dollar amount not a percentage of the portfolio CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 35 fiscal year annual effective rate of return is 1.88% as of December, a 13 basis point increase over fiscal quarter one. Throughout the quarter, three CDs and three treasuries matured for a total PAR value of $4,228,000. This money, along with an additional $986,000, was used to purchase 19 new investments (two government agency bonds, two corporate notes, and 15 CDs). All maturities and purchases are individually listed in detail in the attached report (Attachment 1). Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City’s investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long-term; therefore, SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a “buy and hold” Investment Policy, unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. For the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP and LAIF as needed. Longer term investments may include government-sponsored enterprise (agency bonds) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long- term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES - None Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Approved by: Karla Campos, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Treasurer’s Report for October 1 to December 31, 2018 Total Earnings Average Days to Maturity Effective Rate of Return YTD October 219,385.55$ 387 2.01% November 217,500.84$ 384 2.07% December 220,133.02$ 386 2.03% Quarter 657,019.41$ 386 2.04% 36 -- GEM of the DESERT --· - Investments Bank Accounts Local Agency lnvstmnt Fund-Housing Local Agency Investment Fund-City Federal Agency Coupon Securities Treasury Coupon Securities Certificate of Deposits Corporate Notes Money Market Accounts Money Market with Fiscal Agent Managed Pool Accounts-OPEB Trust Investments Total Earnin!;J_!_ Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Par Value 1,998,614.61 16,164,188.47 48,410,563.09 22,400,000.00 15,500,000.00 18,231,000.00 4,400,000.00 1,002,232.50 5,669.24 1,541,740.25 129,654,008.16 October 31 Month Ending 219,385.55 128,531,503.30 2.01% City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31, 2018 Market Value 1,998,614.61 16,119,719.09 48,318,062.14 21,850,901.50 15,044,740.00 17,917,691.14 4,316,141.00 1,002,232.50 5,669.24 1,541,740.25 128,115,511.47 Fiscal Year To Date 879,700.19 144,207,279.70 1.81% Book Value 1,998,614.61 16,164,188.47 48,410,563.09 22,324,500.00 15,380,290.00 18,231,000.00 4,349,010.00 1,002,232.50 5,669.24 1,541,740.25 129,407,808.16 % of Days to Portfolio Term Maturity 1.54 12.49 37.41 1 17.25 1,442 908 11.89 1,266 678 14.09 1,451 929 3.36 949 548 077 1 0.00 1.19 100.00% 636 387 I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code; and is in comformity with the City Investment Policy. City of La Quinta YTM 365 Equiv. 0.000 2.144 2.144 1.912 1.573 2.250 1.869 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.966 As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the pools expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the Bureau of the Public Debt, U.S. Bank monthly statement, and First Empire monthly custodian reports to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Karla Campos, Finance Director Reporting period 10/01/2018-10/31/2018 Run Date: 02/04/2019 -12:02 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF _PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 137 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1First Empire Bank1060 12,500.00 12,500.0007/01/2016 12,500.00 1SYS1060 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 237,137.75 237,137.7507/01/2016 237,137.75 1SYS1062 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 1,745,676.86 1,745,676.8607/01/2016 1,745,676.86 14159282482 0.000 1,998,614.61 11,998,614.611,998,614.61728,295.32Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 16,164,188.47 16,164,188.47 2.14416,119,719.09 125-33-005 2.144 16,164,188.47 116,119,719.0916,164,188.4716,114,117.90Subtotal and Average 1 2.144 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 48,410,563.09 48,410,563.09 2.14448,318,062.14 198-33-434 2.144 48,410,563.09 148,318,062.1448,410,563.0948,326,551.88Subtotal and Average 1 2.144 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 253Federal Farm Credit Bank1092 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 07/12/20191.08007/10/2017 989,640.00 7323133EGLC7 1.456 1,035Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 964,170.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 231Federal Farm Credit Bank1141 500,000.00 494,750.00 06/20/20191.21005/31/2018 495,780.00 3853133EGFU4 2.224 554Federal Farm Credit Bank1142 500,000.00 491,750.00 05/08/20201.55005/31/2018 490,315.00 7083133EHJA2 2.427 1,769Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 246,467.50 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 909Federal Home Loan Bank1053 2,500,000.00 2,491,250.00 04/28/20211.35004/28/2016 2,405,725.00 1,8263130A7QZ1 1.423 725Federal Home Loan Bank1064 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 10/26/20201.37510/26/2016 2,424,400.00 1,4613130A9UQ2 1.375 680Federal Home Loan Bank1104 1,000,000.00 996,800.00 09/11/20201.62511/09/2017 976,150.00 1,0373130A66T9 1.741 1,580Federal Home Loan Bank1121 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/28/20232.37504/02/2018 992,820.00 1,7933130ADMF6 3.111 909Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1054 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 04/28/20211.50004/28/2016 2,455,425.00 1,8263134G8Y37 1.400 1,244Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1073 2,000,000.00 1,990,000.00 03/29/20222.00003/29/2017 1,925,460.00 1,8263134GBAE2 2.106 1,154Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1084 1,000,000.00 999,500.00 12/29/20212.00007/06/2017 964,990.00 1,6373134GBXF4 2.012 1,364Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1090 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 07/27/20222.15007/27/2017 964,030.00 1,8263134GBWG3 2.150 1,551Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1116 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 01/30/20232.55001/30/2018 962,650.00 1,8263134GSCD5 2.550 1,575Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1122 750,000.00 746,625.00 02/23/20232.75004/02/2018 736,485.00 1,7883134GSCQ6 2.849 165Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1129 500,000.00 495,250.00 04/15/20191.12505/10/2018 496,800.00 3403137EADZ9 2.161 1,426Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1156 400,000.00 398,800.00 09/27/20223.00010/15/2018 397,964.00 1,4433134GSWS0 3.081 452Federal National Mtg Assn1072 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 01/27/20201.70003/27/2017 1,972,380.00 1,0363135G0S53 1.700 315Federal National Mtg Assn1139 500,000.00 496,700.00 09/12/20191.75005/31/2018 495,900.00 4693135G0ZG1 2.275 274Federal National Mtg Assn1140 500,000.00 492,000.00 08/02/20190.87505/31/2018 493,350.00 4283135G0N33 2.269 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 12:02 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 38 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date 22,324,500.00 1,44221,850,901.5022,400,000.0022,032,724.19Subtotal and Average 908 1.912 Treasury Coupon Securities 972U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 4,772,050.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 516U.S. Treasury1068 2,500,000.00 2,483,250.00 03/31/20201.37503/20/2017 2,450,100.00 1,107912828J84 1.602 409U.S. Treasury1069 2,500,000.00 2,490,750.00 12/15/20191.37503/20/2017 2,461,925.00 1,000912828U73 1.513 1,095U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 1,903,440.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 14U.S. Treasury1103 500,000.00 498,840.00 11/15/20181.25011/09/2017 499,835.00 371912828M64 1.481 653U.S. Treasury1117 1,000,000.00 985,800.00 08/15/20201.50001/22/2018 976,290.00 9369128282Q2 2.071 211U.S. Treasury1130 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 05/31/20191.50005/10/2018 993,950.00 386912828WL0 2.211 29U.S. Treasury1131 500,000.00 498,000.00 11/30/20181.25005/10/2018 499,630.00 204912828A34 1.974 546U.S. Treasury1138 500,000.00 488,250.00 04/30/20201.12505/31/2018 487,520.00 700912828VA5 2.387 15,380,290.00 1,26615,044,740.0015,500,000.0016,510,338.39Subtotal and Average 678 1.573 Certificate of Deposits 200First Business Bank1019 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/20/2014 239,200.80 1,82631938QH72 1.751 385First Farmers Bank &Trust Co.1091 240,000.00 240,000.00 11/21/20191.65007/21/2017 237,516.00 853320165HX4 1.653 1,722First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 241,506.30 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 718First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 243,468.75 91533715LBJ8 2.623 1,187Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 239,502.20 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 1,320Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 243,395.25 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 1,442Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 235,094.65 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 53Ally Bank Midvale1001 240,000.00 240,000.00 12/24/20181.70012/24/2015 239,836.80 1,09602006LWX7 1.702 900Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 234,288.00 1,46102587DP85 2.252 1,397American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 230,076.00 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 1,602Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 238,816.20 1,826034577AH9 2.802 1,454Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 230,618.40 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 1,117Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 237,164.90 1,462080515CD9 2.101 1,211BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 232,178.40 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 805Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 233,503.20 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 949Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 234,760.80 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 587Capital One USA FDIC339541006 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/10/20201.90006/10/2015 241,449.95 1,827140420RX0 1.902 844Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 232,584.00 1,82720033APG5 1.702 1,622Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 239,659.00 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 204City National Bank of Florida1132 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/24/20192.20005/24/2018 239,755.20 36517801DDT0 2.200 986Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 231,955.20 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 216Connect One1011 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20191.50006/05/2015 246,926.16 1,46120786ABD6 1.501 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 12:02 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 39 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,478CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 234,190.60 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 1,188Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 232,766.40 1,8262546722U1 2.251 446Douglas National Bank1093 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/21/20201.65007/19/2017 236,930.40 916259744DS6 1.655 811Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 243,824.00 91527002YDV5 2.858 1,639EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 235,111.20 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 1,488Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 233,619.75 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 180Ephrata Bank1016 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20191.65004/30/2014 239,599.20 1,826294209AQ4 1.651 582EverBank1017248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20201.70006/05/2015 243,498.80 1,82729976DXX3 1.702 96Farmers & Merch1018 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/05/20191.25006/05/2015 247,387.44 1,341307814DC4 1.252 1,275Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 236,263.20 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 782Freedom Credit Union1111 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 239,889.30 1,09635638BAA9 2.052 200Gulf Coast Bank1024 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/19/2014 239,198.40 1,827402194EB6 1.724 1,019General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 239,632.80 1,097369674AV8 3.100 1,272Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 233,157.60 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 620First Bank of Highland1094 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/13/20201.75007/13/2017 235,382.40 1,096319141GT8 1.752 1,351HSBC Bank USA, National Associ1088 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20222.30007/14/2017 231,638.40 1,82640434YLE5 2.301 1,813Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 243,118.40 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 558Jefferson Bank & Trust1100 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/12/20201.75011/09/2017 240,999.15 915472376AC6 1.751 1,293Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 235,329.85 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 1,519Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 235,641.00 1,826499724AB8 2.401 1,811Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 245,534.88 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 614Mercantile Bank of Michigan1087 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/07/20201.75007/07/2017 235,452.00 1,09658740XZL7 1.752 120Metabank Sioux Falls1133 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/01/20192.05005/15/2018 244,853.00 29059101LDR5 2.057 589Bank Midwest1002 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20201.65006/12/2015 243,193.76 1,827063615AVO 1.652 382Morgan Stanley Bank1109 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.80011/16/2017 242,885.65 73261747MA92 1.800 41Morton Community1030 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/12/20181.25006/12/2015 247,823.92 1,279619165GE7 1.251 1,457Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 247,012.96 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 382Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1108 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.75011/16/2017 242,758.25 73261760AEP0 1.750 1,468Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 235,226.95 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 1,811Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 241,449.95 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,090Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 236,678.40 1,279666613GV0 2.703 1,733Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 246,465.18 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 116New York Community Bank1137 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/25/20192.05005/25/2018 244,845.65 276649447RL5 2.050 1,175The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 230,287.20 1,645677721CN0 1.903 1,315PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 242,584.30 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 208Peapack-Gladstone Bank1031 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/28/20191.80005/28/2014 239,500.80 1,826704692AL6 1.801 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 12:02 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 40 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 937PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 231,009.60 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 1,692RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 241,707.20 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 753First Bank Richmond1081 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 238,892.15 1,251319267GC8 1.802 308Riverwood1034248,000.00 248,000.00 09/05/20191.40006/05/2015 246,373.12 1,55376951DAL4 1.402 1,328Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 232,260.00 1,826795450A70 2.351 215Solomon State1035 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/04/20191.40006/04/2015 246,931.12 1,46183427LAX2 1.401 537Stearnes Bank, N.A.1076 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/21/20201.60004/21/2017 235,780.80 1,096857894TC3 1.588 1,309Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 232,840.80 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 911Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 238,200.00 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 1,376Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 242,233.95 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 1,811UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 243,120.85 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 196Union BankNA1136 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/16/20192.20005/16/2018 239,772.00 36590521AQW1 2.200 866Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 241,937.50 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 1,656University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 235,994.40 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 173Webster Bank1042 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/23/20191.80004/23/2014 239,616.00 1,82694768NJQ8 1.801 117Wells Fargo1043 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/26/20191.20002/26/2016 239,546.40 1,0969497483N5 1.201 592Wex Bank1145 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/15/20202.75006/13/2018 244,487.95 73392937CHG6 2.754 18,231,000.00 1,45117,917,691.1418,231,000.0017,668,548.39Subtotal and Average 929 2.250 Corporate Notes 1,007Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 478,265.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 120Johnson and Johnson Corp1075 2,000,000.00 1,993,200.00 03/01/20191.12503/29/2017 1,989,860.00 702478160BR4 1.305 462Microsoft Corporation1118 500,000.00 497,700.00 02/06/20201.85001/22/2018 493,675.00 745594918BV5 2.081 1,741Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 374,816.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 1,193Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 486,410.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 351Toyota Motor Credit Corp1098 500,000.00 498,750.00 10/18/20191.55011/07/2017 493,115.00 71089236TDH5 1.681 4,349,010.00 9494,316,141.004,400,000.003,957,773.23Subtotal and Average 548 1.869 Money Market Accounts 1California Asset Management Pr1153 1,002,232.50 1,002,232.5009/26/2018 1,002,232.50 1SYS1153 0.000 1,002,232.50 11,002,232.501,002,232.501,000,363.59Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 5,669.24 5,669.2407/01/2016 5,669.24 1SYS1058 0.000 5,669.24 15,669.245,669.24651,050.16Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 12:02 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 41 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value October 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Managed Pool Accounts-OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,541,740.25 1,541,740.2507/01/2018 1,541,740.25 1SYS1114 0.000 1,541,740.25 11,541,740.251,541,740.251,541,740.25Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 636128,531,503.30 129,654,008.16 387 1.966128,115,511.47 129,407,808.16Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 12:02 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 42 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 496,700.001139500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.16 0.00 729.161.728101496,700.003135G0ZG1 0.00 2,000,000.0010722,000,000.00 1.700FNMA 2,833.34 0.00 2,833.341.6681012,000,000.003135G0S53 0.00 492,000.001140500,000.00 0.875FNMA 364.59 0.00 364.590.873101492,000.003135G0N33 0.00 1,000,000.0011161,000,000.00 2.550FHLMC 2,125.00 0.00 2,125.002.5021011,000,000.003134GSCD5 0.00 1,000,000.0010901,000,000.00 2.150FHLMC 1,791.67 0.00 1,791.672.1101011,000,000.003134GBWG3 0.00 2,500,000.0010542,500,000.00 1.500FHLMC 3,125.00 0.00 3,125.001.4721012,500,000.003134G8Y37 0.00 999,500.0010841,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 1,666.66 0.00 1,666.661.963101999,500.003134GBXF4 0.00 1,990,000.0010732,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.341.9721011,990,000.003134GBAE2 0.00 495,250.001129500,000.00 1.125FHLMC 468.75 0.00 468.751.114101495,250.003137EADZ9 0.00 746,625.001122750,000.00 2.750FHLMC 1,718.75 0.00 1,718.752.710101746,625.003134GSCQ6 0.00 398,800.001156400,000.00 3.000FHLMC 533.33 0.00 533.332.8711010.003134GSWS0 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.66 0.00 1,416.661.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 494,750.001141500,000.00 1.210FFCB 504.17 0.00 504.171.200101494,750.003133EGFU4 0.00 992,600.0010921,000,000.00 1.080FFCB 900.00 0.00 900.001.068101992,600.003133EGLC7 0.00 491,750.001142500,000.00 1.550FFCB 645.84 0.00 645.841.546101491,750.003133EHJA2 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 311.11 0.00 311.112.7011010.003133EJYL7 0.00 2,491,250.0010532,500,000.00 1.350FHLB 2,812.50 0.00 2,812.501.3291012,491,250.003130A7QZ1 0.00 996,800.0011041,000,000.00 1.625FHLB 1,354.16 0.00 1,354.161.600101996,800.003130A66T9 0.00 2,500,000.0010642,500,000.00 1.375FHLB 2,864.58 0.00 2,864.581.3491012,500,000.003130A9UQ2 0.00 999,000.0011211,000,000.00 2.375FHLB 1,979.17 0.00 1,979.172.333101999,000.003130ADMF6 0.00 2,483,250.0010682,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,927.54 0.00 2,927.541.3881012,483,250.00912828J84 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,107.10 0.00 2,107.101.2771011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 2,490,750.0010692,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,911.55 0.00 2,911.551.3761012,490,750.00912828U73 0.00 985,800.0011171,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,263.59 0.00 1,263.591.509101985,800.009128282Q2 0.00 488,250.001138500,000.00 1.125USTR 474.10 0.00 474.101.143101488,250.00912828VA5 0.00 992,600.0011301,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,270.50 0.00 1,270.501.507101992,600.00912828WL0 0.00 498,000.001131500,000.00 1.250USTR 529.37 0.00 529.371.252101498,000.00912828A34 0.00 0.0010630.00 0.875USTR 836.75 0.00 -1,413.250.8721012,502,250.00912828L81 -2,250.00 498,840.001103500,000.00 1.250USTR 526.50 0.00 526.501.243101498,840.00912828M64 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,738.45 0.00 4,738.451.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:33 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.143 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001043240,000.00 1.200WELLS 244.60 0.00 244.601.200101240,000.009497483N5 0.00 1,745,676.8610571,745,676.86WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.01101399,222.744159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001042240,000.00 1.800WEB 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.0094768NJQ8 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 0.0010200.00 1.5001STMER 286.02 0.00 286.021.500101240,000.0032082BDF3 0.00 240,000.001016240,000.00 1.650EPHRAT 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00294209AQ4 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 22.08 0.00 22.083.2501010.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001019240,000.00 1.7501STBUS 356.72 0.00 356.721.750101240,000.0031938QH72 0.00 240,000.001024240,000.00 1.750GCB 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.00402194EB6 0.00 240,000.001031240,000.00 1.800PEAPAC 366.91 0.00 366.911.800101240,000.00704692AL6 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001030248,000.00 1.250MORTN 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.00619165GE7 0.00 248,000.001018248,000.00 1.250FARMER 263.29 0.00 263.291.250101248,000.00307814DC4 0.00 248,000.001035248,000.00 1.400SOLOM 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.0083427LAX2 0.00 248,000.001011248,000.00 1.500CONNEC 315.95 0.00 315.951.500101248,000.0020786ABD6 0.00 248,000.001034248,000.00 1.400RVRW 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.0076951DAL4 0.00 248,000.001017248,000.00 1.700EVRBA 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0029976DXX3 0.00 245,000.001006245,000.00 1.900CAPONE 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.00140420RX0 0.00 248,000.001002248,000.00 1.650MIDWES 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.00063615AVO 0.00 240,000.001001240,000.00 1.700ALLY 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0002006LWX7 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 48,410,563.09105548,410,563.09 2.144LAIF 98,481.57 0.00 98,481.572.39910149,617,395.4298-33-434 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 1,993,200.0010752,000,000.00 1.125J&J 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.001.1081011,993,200.00478160BR4 0.00 240,000.001076240,000.00 1.600STRNS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101240,000.00857894TC3 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.84 0.00 645.841.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.01 0.00 479.012.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.09 0.00 377.091.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.91 0.00 366.911.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:33 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.144 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001087240,000.00 1.750MERCTL 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.0058740XZL7 0.00 240,000.001088240,000.00 2.300HSBC 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0040434YLE5 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.29 0.00 387.291.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 240,000.001091240,000.00 1.6501STFRM 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00320165HX4 0.00 240,000.001093240,000.00 1.650DOUGLS 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00259744DS6 0.00 240,000.001094240,000.00 1.750HIGHLD 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.00319141GT8 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.18 0.00 468.182.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 498,750.001098500,000.00 1.550TOYOTA 645.83 0.00 645.831.525101498,750.0089236TDH5 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001100245,000.00 1.750JFFRSN 364.15 0.00 364.151.750101245,000.00472376AC6 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.98 0.00 436.982.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001108245,000.00 1.750MSPRIV 364.14 0.00 364.141.750101245,000.0061760AEP0 0.00 245,000.001109245,000.00 1.800MORGST 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.0061747MA92 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.39 0.00 499.392.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,541,740.2511141,541,740.25CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,541,740.25SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 355.55 0.00 355.552.0181010.00594918BQ6 0.00 497,700.001118500,000.00 1.850MCRSFT 770.84 0.00 770.841.824101497,700.00594918BV5 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.43 0.00 603.432.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 561.82 0.00 561.822.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.35 0.00 550.352.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001132240,000.00 2.200CNBF 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0017801DDT0 0.00 245,000.001133245,000.00 2.050METASF 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0059101LDR5 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001137245,000.00 2.050NYCMBK 426.56 0.00 426.562.050101245,000.00649447RL5 0.00 240,000.001136240,000.00 2.200UNION 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0090521AQW1 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.06 0.00 645.063.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:33 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.145 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest October 1, 2018 - October 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001145245,000.00 2.750WEX 572.23 0.00 572.232.750101245,000.0092937CHG6 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.24 0.00 624.243.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.24 0.00 624.243.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.89 0.00 631.893.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.30 0.00 687.303.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 1,002,232.5011531,002,232.50CAMP 1,931.21 0.00 1,931.212.2731011,000,301.29SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 292.32 0.00 292.323.3501010.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 313.91 0.00 313.913.3001010.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 511.11 0.00 511.112.2491010.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 300.71 0.00 300.713.2001010.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 314.81 0.00 314.813.3501010.0090348JEJ5 0.00 113,234,512.70Subtotal 112,988,312.70 1.953 184,954.060.00187,204.06112,845,624.70 -2,250.00 Fund: 1st Empire Securities Cash Bal 12,500.00106012,500.00EMPIRE 100.03 0.00 100.032.96510252,810.58SYS1060 0.00 12,500.00Subtotal 12,500.00 2.965 100.030.00100.0352,810.58 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 5,669.2410585,669.24USBANK 1,493.54 0.00 1,493.542.701231672,562.86SYS1058 0.00 5,669.24Subtotal 5,669.24 2.701 1,493.540.001,493.54672,562.86 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 237,137.751062237,137.75LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241242,792.85SYS1062 0.00 237,137.75Subtotal 237,137.75 0.000.000.00242,792.85 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,164,188.47111316,164,188.47 2.144LAIF 32,837.92 0.00 32,837.922.39924916,053,317.9225-33-005 0.00 16,164,188.47Subtotal 16,164,188.47 2.399 32,837.920.0032,837.9216,053,317.92 0.00 129,654,008.16Total 129,407,808.16 2.010 219,385.550.00221,635.55129,867,108.91 -2,250.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:33 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.146 47 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1First Empire Bank1060 500,000.00 500,000.0007/01/2016 500,000.00 1SYS1060 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 242,547.25 242,547.2507/01/2016 242,547.25 1SYS1062 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 2,565,606.45 2,565,606.4507/01/2016 2,565,606.45 14159282482 0.000 3,311,453.70 13,311,453.703,311,453.702,184,307.86Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 16,164,188.47 16,164,188.47 2.20816,119,719.09 125-33-005 2.208 16,164,188.47 116,119,719.0916,164,188.4716,164,188.47Subtotal and Average 1 2.208 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 46,410,563.09 46,410,563.09 2.20846,318,062.14 198-33-434 2.208 46,410,563.09 146,318,062.1446,410,563.0946,943,896.42Subtotal and Average 1 2.208 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 223Federal Farm Credit Bank1092 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 07/12/20191.08007/10/2017 990,750.00 7323133EGLC7 1.456 1,005Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 967,620.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 201Federal Farm Credit Bank1141 500,000.00 494,750.00 06/20/20191.21005/31/2018 496,215.00 3853133EGFU4 2.224 524Federal Farm Credit Bank1142 500,000.00 491,750.00 05/08/20201.55005/31/2018 491,435.00 7083133EHJA2 2.427 1,739Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 247,435.00 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 879Federal Home Loan Bank1053 2,500,000.00 2,491,250.00 04/28/20211.35004/28/2016 2,413,150.00 1,8263130A7QZ1 1.423 695Federal Home Loan Bank1064 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 10/26/20201.37510/26/2016 2,431,150.00 1,4613130A9UQ2 1.375 650Federal Home Loan Bank1104 1,000,000.00 996,800.00 09/11/20201.62511/09/2017 978,490.00 1,0373130A66T9 1.741 1,550Federal Home Loan Bank1121 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/28/20232.37504/02/2018 995,670.00 1,7933130ADMF6 3.111 879Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1054 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 04/28/20211.50004/28/2016 2,462,275.00 1,8263134G8Y37 1.400 1,214Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1073 2,000,000.00 1,990,000.00 03/29/20222.00003/29/2017 1,941,640.00 1,8263134GBAE2 2.106 1,124Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1084 1,000,000.00 999,500.00 12/29/20212.00007/06/2017 973,440.00 1,6373134GBXF4 2.012 1,334Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1090 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 07/27/20222.15007/27/2017 969,370.00 1,8263134GBWG3 2.150 1,521Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1116 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 01/30/20232.55001/30/2018 979,860.00 1,8263134GSCD5 2.550 1,545Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1122 750,000.00 746,625.00 02/23/20232.75004/02/2018 740,722.50 1,7883134GSCQ6 2.849 135Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1129 500,000.00 495,250.00 04/15/20191.12505/10/2018 497,525.00 3403137EADZ9 2.161 1,396Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1156 400,000.00 398,800.00 09/27/20223.00010/15/2018 399,952.00 1,4433134GSWS0 3.081 422Federal National Mtg Assn1072 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 01/27/20201.70003/27/2017 1,974,700.00 1,0363135G0S53 1.700 285Federal National Mtg Assn1139 500,000.00 496,700.00 09/12/20191.75005/31/2018 496,305.00 4693135G0ZG1 2.275 244Federal National Mtg Assn1140 500,000.00 492,000.00 08/02/20190.87505/31/2018 494,080.00 4283135G0N33 2.269 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:46 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 48 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date 22,324,500.00 1,44221,941,784.5022,400,000.0022,324,500.00Subtotal and Average 878 1.912 Treasury Coupon Securities 942U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 4,791,400.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 486U.S. Treasury1068 2,500,000.00 2,483,250.00 03/31/20201.37503/20/2017 2,453,700.00 1,107912828J84 1.602 379U.S. Treasury1069 2,500,000.00 2,490,750.00 12/15/20191.37503/20/2017 2,464,950.00 1,000912828U73 1.513 1,065U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 1,911,960.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 623U.S. Treasury1117 1,000,000.00 985,800.00 08/15/20201.50001/22/2018 978,320.00 9369128282Q2 2.071 181U.S. Treasury1130 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 05/31/20191.50005/10/2018 994,810.00 386912828WL0 2.211 516U.S. Treasury1138 500,000.00 488,250.00 04/30/20201.12505/31/2018 488,495.00 700912828VA5 2.387 14,383,450.00 1,33414,083,635.0014,500,000.0015,097,642.00Subtotal and Average 694 1.562 Certificate of Deposits 170First Business Bank1019 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/20/2014 239,251.20 1,82631938QH72 1.751 355First Farmers Bank &Trust Co.1091 240,000.00 240,000.00 11/21/20191.65007/21/2017 237,492.00 853320165HX4 1.653 1,692First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 241,026.10 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 688First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 243,334.00 91533715LBJ8 2.623 1,157Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 239,181.25 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 1,290Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 242,870.95 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 1,412Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 234,636.50 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 23Ally Bank Midvale1001 240,000.00 240,000.00 12/24/20181.70012/24/2015 239,930.40 1,09602006LWX7 1.702 870Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 234,144.00 1,46102587DP85 2.252 1,367American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 229,744.80 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 1,572Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 238,296.80 1,826034577AH9 2.802 1,424Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 230,150.40 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 1,087Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 236,954.20 1,462080515CD9 2.101 1,181BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 231,902.40 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 775Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 233,448.00 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 919Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 234,578.40 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 557Capital One USA FDIC339541006 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/10/20201.90006/10/2015 241,381.35 1,827140420RX0 1.902 814Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 232,540.80 1,82720033APG5 1.702 1,592Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 239,134.70 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 174City National Bank of Florida1132 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/24/20192.20005/24/2018 239,716.80 36517801DDT0 2.200 956Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 231,832.80 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 1,810Commercial Bank1162 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/15/20233.40011/15/2018 246,087.92 1,82620143PDV9 3.402 186Connect One1011 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20191.50006/05/2015 246,998.08 1,46120786ABD6 1.501 1,448CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 233,707.95 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:46 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 49 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,158Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 232,497.60 1,8262546722U1 2.251 416Douglas National Bank1093 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/21/20201.65007/19/2017 236,877.60 916259744DS6 1.655 781Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 243,566.75 91527002YDV5 2.858 1,609EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 234,600.00 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 1,458Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 233,139.55 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 150Ephrata Bank1016 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20191.65004/30/2014 239,606.40 1,826294209AQ4 1.651 552EverBank1017248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20201.70006/05/2015 243,476.48 1,82729976DXX3 1.702 66Farmers & Merch1018 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/05/20191.25006/05/2015 247,573.44 1,341307814DC4 1.252 1,245Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 235,826.40 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 752Freedom Credit Union1111 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 239,793.75 1,09635638BAA9 2.052 170Gulf Coast Bank1024 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/19/2014 239,253.60 1,827402194EB6 1.724 989General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 239,263.20 1,097369674AV8 3.100 1,242Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 232,802.40 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 590First Bank of Highland1094 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/13/20201.75007/13/2017 235,365.60 1,096319141GT8 1.752 1,321HSBC Bank USA, National Associ1088 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20222.30007/14/2017 231,249.60 1,82640434YLE5 2.301 1,783Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 242,697.00 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 528Jefferson Bank & Trust1100 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/12/20201.75011/09/2017 240,937.90 915472376AC6 1.751 1,263Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 235,008.90 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 1,489Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 235,131.40 1,826499724AB8 2.401 1,781Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 245,115.76 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 584Mercantile Bank of Michigan1087 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/07/20201.75007/07/2017 235,432.80 1,09658740XZL7 1.752 90Metabank Sioux Falls1133 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/01/20192.05005/15/2018 244,830.95 29059101LDR5 2.057 559Bank Midwest1002 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20201.65006/12/2015 243,183.84 1,827063615AVO 1.652 352Morgan Stanley Bank1109 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.80011/16/2017 242,834.20 73261747MA92 1.800 11Morton Community1030 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/12/20181.25006/12/2015 247,947.92 1,279619165GE7 1.251 1,427Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 246,340.88 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 352Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1108 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.75011/16/2017 242,719.05 73261760AEP0 1.750 1,438Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 234,736.95 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 1,781Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 241,055.50 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,823Numerica Credit Union1164 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/28/20233.55011/28/2018 247,724.72 1,82667054NAN3 3.552 1,060Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 236,359.20 1,279666613GV0 2.703 1,703Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 245,969.67 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 86New York Community Bank1137 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/25/20192.05005/25/2018 244,830.95 276649447RL5 2.050 1,145The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 230,088.00 1,645677721CN0 1.903 1,285PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 242,074.70 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 178Peapack-Gladstone Bank1031 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/28/20191.80005/28/2014 239,503.20 1,826704692AL6 1.801 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:46 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 50 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 907PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 230,944.80 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 1,662RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 241,197.60 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 723First Bank Richmond1081 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 238,877.45 1,251319267GC8 1.802 278Riverwood1034248,000.00 248,000.00 09/05/20191.40006/05/2015 246,445.04 1,55376951DAL4 1.402 1,298Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 231,880.80 1,826795450A70 2.351 185Solomon State1035 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/04/20191.40006/04/2015 247,005.52 1,46183427LAX2 1.401 507Stearnes Bank, N.A.1076 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/21/20201.60004/21/2017 235,759.20 1,096857894TC3 1.588 1,279Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 232,464.00 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 881Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 237,921.60 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 1,346Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 241,680.25 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 1,781UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 242,699.45 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 166Union BankNA1136 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/16/20192.20005/16/2018 239,738.40 36590521AQW1 2.200 836Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 241,719.45 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 1,626University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 235,480.80 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 143Webster Bank1042 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/23/20191.80004/23/2014 239,620.80 1,82694768NJQ8 1.801 87Wells Fargo1043 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/26/20191.20002/26/2016 239,611.20 1,0969497483N5 1.201 562Wex Bank1145 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/15/20202.75006/13/2018 244,265.00 73392937CHG6 2.754 18,727,000.00 1,46118,395,069.0218,727,000.0018,379,800.00Subtotal and Average 923 2.282 Corporate Notes 977Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 479,000.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 90Johnson and Johnson Corp1075 2,000,000.00 1,993,200.00 03/01/20191.12503/29/2017 1,991,840.00 702478160BR4 1.305 432Microsoft Corporation1118 500,000.00 497,700.00 02/06/20201.85001/22/2018 494,015.00 745594918BV5 2.081 1,711Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 376,144.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 1,163Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 488,310.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 321Toyota Motor Credit Corp1098 500,000.00 498,750.00 10/18/20191.55011/07/2017 494,140.00 71089236TDH5 1.681 4,349,010.00 9494,323,449.004,400,000.004,349,010.00Subtotal and Average 518 1.869 Money Market Accounts 1California Asset Management Pr1153 1,004,175.23 1,004,175.2309/26/2018 1,004,175.23 1SYS1153 0.000 1,004,175.23 11,004,175.231,004,175.231,002,297.26Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 5,676.44 5,676.4407/01/2016 5,676.44 1SYS1058 0.000 5,676.44 15,676.445,676.445,669.48Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:46 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 51 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value November 30, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Managed Pool Accounts-OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,541,740.25 1,541,740.2507/01/2018 1,541,740.25 1SYS1114 0.000 1,541,740.25 11,541,740.251,541,740.251,541,740.25Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 647127,993,051.74 128,464,797.18 384 1.982127,044,764.37 128,221,757.18Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:46 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 52 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 496,700.001139500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.786101496,700.003135G0ZG1 0.00 2,000,000.0010722,000,000.00 1.700FNMA 2,833.33 0.00 2,833.331.7241012,000,000.003135G0S53 0.00 492,000.001140500,000.00 0.875FNMA 364.58 0.00 364.580.902101492,000.003135G0N33 0.00 1,000,000.0011161,000,000.00 2.550FHLMC 2,125.00 0.00 2,125.002.5851011,000,000.003134GSCD5 0.00 1,000,000.0010901,000,000.00 2.150FHLMC 1,791.67 0.00 1,791.672.1801011,000,000.003134GBWG3 0.00 2,500,000.0010542,500,000.00 1.500FHLMC 3,125.00 0.00 3,125.001.5211012,500,000.003134G8Y37 0.00 999,500.0010841,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 1,666.67 0.00 1,666.672.029101999,500.003134GBXF4 0.00 1,990,000.0010732,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 3,333.33 0.00 3,333.332.0381011,990,000.003134GBAE2 0.00 495,250.001129500,000.00 1.125FHLMC 468.75 0.00 468.751.152101495,250.003137EADZ9 0.00 746,625.001122750,000.00 2.750FHLMC 1,718.75 0.00 1,718.752.801101746,625.003134GSCQ6 0.00 398,800.001156400,000.00 3.000FHLMC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.003.051101398,800.003134GSWS0 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.737101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 494,750.001141500,000.00 1.210FFCB 504.16 0.00 504.161.240101494,750.003133EGFU4 0.00 992,600.0010921,000,000.00 1.080FFCB 900.00 0.00 900.001.103101992,600.003133EGLC7 0.00 491,750.001142500,000.00 1.550FFCB 645.83 0.00 645.831.598101491,750.003133EHJA2 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.33 0.00 583.332.870101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 2,491,250.0010532,500,000.00 1.350FHLB 2,812.50 0.00 2,812.501.3741012,491,250.003130A7QZ1 0.00 996,800.0011041,000,000.00 1.625FHLB 1,354.17 0.00 1,354.171.653101996,800.003130A66T9 0.00 2,500,000.0010642,500,000.00 1.375FHLB 2,864.58 0.00 2,864.581.3941012,500,000.003130A9UQ2 0.00 999,000.0011211,000,000.00 2.375FHLB 1,979.17 0.00 1,979.172.410101999,000.003130ADMF6 0.00 2,483,250.0010682,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,833.10 0.00 2,833.101.3881012,483,250.00912828J84 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,071.82 0.00 2,071.821.2971011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 2,490,750.0010692,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,817.62 0.00 2,817.621.3761012,490,750.00912828U73 0.00 985,800.0011171,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,222.82 0.00 1,222.821.509101985,800.009128282Q2 0.00 488,250.001138500,000.00 1.125USTR 466.16 0.00 466.161.162101488,250.00912828VA5 0.00 992,600.0011301,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,229.73 0.00 1,229.731.507101992,600.00912828WL0 0.00 0.0011310.00 1.250USTR 495.22 0.00 2,495.221.252101498,000.00912828A34 2,000.00 0.0011030.00 1.250USTR 237.77 0.00 1,397.771.243101498,840.00912828M64 1,160.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,585.60 0.00 4,585.601.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 240,000.001043240,000.00 1.200WELLS 236.71 0.00 236.711.200101240,000.009497483N5 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:35 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.153 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 2,565,606.4510572,565,606.45WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.011011,745,676.864159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 473.42 0.00 473.422.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 443.83 0.00 443.832.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001042240,000.00 1.800WEB 355.07 0.00 355.071.800101240,000.0094768NJQ8 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 433.97 0.00 433.972.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 453.70 0.00 453.702.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 503.42 0.00 503.422.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 240,000.001016240,000.00 1.650EPHRAT 325.48 0.00 325.481.650101240,000.00294209AQ4 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 662.47 0.00 662.473.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001019240,000.00 1.7501STBUS 345.20 0.00 345.201.750101240,000.0031938QH72 0.00 240,000.001024240,000.00 1.750GCB 345.21 0.00 345.211.750101240,000.00402194EB6 0.00 240,000.001031240,000.00 1.800PEAPAC 355.07 0.00 355.071.800101240,000.00704692AL6 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 248,000.001030248,000.00 1.250MORTN 254.80 0.00 254.801.250101248,000.00619165GE7 0.00 248,000.001018248,000.00 1.250FARMER 254.80 0.00 254.801.250101248,000.00307814DC4 0.00 248,000.001035248,000.00 1.400SOLOM 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.0083427LAX2 0.00 248,000.001011248,000.00 1.500CONNEC 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101248,000.0020786ABD6 0.00 248,000.001034248,000.00 1.400RVRW 285.37 0.00 285.371.400101248,000.0076951DAL4 0.00 248,000.001017248,000.00 1.700EVRBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101248,000.0029976DXX3 0.00 245,000.001006245,000.00 1.900CAPONE 382.60 0.00 382.601.900101245,000.00140420RX0 0.00 248,000.001002248,000.00 1.650MIDWES 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101248,000.00063615AVO 0.00 240,000.001001240,000.00 1.700ALLY 335.34 0.00 335.341.700101240,000.0002006LWX7 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 335.35 0.00 335.351.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 295.89 0.00 295.891.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 46,410,563.09105546,410,563.09 2.208LAIF 92,578.01 0.00 92,578.012.39910148,410,563.0998-33-434 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 443.84 0.00 443.842.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 1,993,200.0010752,000,000.00 1.125J&J 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.001.1451011,993,200.00478160BR4 0.00 240,000.001076240,000.00 1.600STRNS 315.61 0.00 315.611.600101240,000.00857894TC3 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.594101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 362.47 0.00 362.471.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 443.84 0.00 443.842.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 463.56 0.00 463.562.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 364.93 0.00 364.931.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 355.07 0.00 355.071.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001087240,000.00 1.750MERCTL 345.21 0.00 345.211.750101240,000.0058740XZL7 0.00 240,000.001088240,000.00 2.300HSBC 453.70 0.00 453.702.300101240,000.0040434YLE5 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:35 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.154 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 374.80 0.00 374.801.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 240,000.001091240,000.00 1.6501STFRM 325.48 0.00 325.481.650101240,000.00320165HX4 0.00 240,000.001093240,000.00 1.650DOUGLS 325.48 0.00 325.481.650101240,000.00259744DS6 0.00 240,000.001094240,000.00 1.750HIGHLD 345.21 0.00 345.211.750101240,000.00319141GT8 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 453.08 0.00 453.082.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 473.43 0.00 473.432.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 498,750.001098500,000.00 1.550TOYOTA 645.83 0.00 645.831.575101498,750.0089236TDH5 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 463.15 0.00 463.152.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001100245,000.00 1.750JFFRSN 352.39 0.00 352.391.750101245,000.00472376AC6 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 422.88 0.00 422.882.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 422.87 0.00 422.872.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 443.01 0.00 443.012.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 432.94 0.00 432.942.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001108245,000.00 1.750MSPRIV 352.40 0.00 352.401.750101245,000.0061760AEP0 0.00 245,000.001109245,000.00 1.800MORGST 362.46 0.00 362.461.800101245,000.0061747MA92 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 483.29 0.00 483.292.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 412.80 0.00 412.802.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,541,740.2511141,541,740.25CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,541,740.25SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.144101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 497,700.001118500,000.00 1.850MCRSFT 770.83 0.00 770.831.884101497,700.00594918BV5 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 563.84 0.00 563.842.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 513.50 0.00 513.502.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 583.98 0.00 583.982.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 543.70 0.00 543.702.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 581.91 0.00 581.912.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 552.33 0.00 552.332.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 532.61 0.00 532.612.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001132240,000.00 2.200CNBF 433.97 0.00 433.972.200101240,000.0017801DDT0 0.00 245,000.001133245,000.00 2.050METASF 412.80 0.00 412.802.050101245,000.0059101LDR5 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 601.64 0.00 601.643.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001137245,000.00 2.050NYCMBK 412.81 0.00 412.812.050101245,000.00649447RL5 0.00 240,000.001136240,000.00 2.200UNION 433.97 0.00 433.972.200101240,000.0090521AQW1 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 624.25 0.00 624.253.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 634.32 0.00 634.323.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001145245,000.00 2.750WEX 553.76 0.00 553.762.750101245,000.0092937CHG6 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 573.91 0.00 573.912.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:35 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.155 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest November 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 634.31 0.00 634.313.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 604.11 0.00 604.113.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 611.50 0.00 611.503.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 665.14 0.00 665.143.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 1,004,175.2311531,004,175.23CAMP 1,942.73 0.00 1,942.732.3581011,002,232.50SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 672.65 0.00 672.653.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.390101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 644.39 0.00 644.393.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 674.59 0.00 674.593.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 346.52 0.00 346.523.4001010.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 72.36 0.00 72.363.5501010.0067054NAN3 0.00 111,552,385.02Subtotal 111,309,345.02 2.026 185,548.640.00182,388.64112,988,312.70 3,160.00 Fund: 1st Empire Securities Cash Bal 500,000.001060500,000.00EMPIRE 67.62 0.00 67.620.59510212,500.00SYS1060 0.00 500,000.00Subtotal 500,000.00 0.595 67.620.0067.6212,500.00 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 5,676.4410585,676.44USBANK 7.20 0.00 7.201.5452315,669.24SYS1058 0.00 5,676.44Subtotal 5,676.44 1.545 7.200.007.205,669.24 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 242,547.251062242,547.25LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241237,137.75SYS1062 0.00 242,547.25Subtotal 242,547.25 0.000.000.00237,137.75 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,164,188.47111316,164,188.47 2.208LAIF 31,877.38 0.00 31,877.382.39924916,164,188.4725-33-005 0.00 16,164,188.47Subtotal 16,164,188.47 2.399 31,877.380.0031,877.3816,164,188.47 0.00 128,464,797.18Total 128,221,757.18 2.068 217,500.840.00214,340.84129,407,808.16 3,160.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:35 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.156 57 Days to Maturity Page 1 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Bank Accounts 1City Petty Cash1059 3,300.00 3,300.0007/01/2016 3,300.00 1SYS1059 0.000 1First Empire Bank1060 0.00 0.0007/01/2016 0.00 1SYS1060 0.000 1La Quinta Palms Realty1062 258,978.62 258,978.6207/01/2016 258,978.62 1SYS1062 0.000 1Wells Fargo1057 3,989,633.85 3,989,633.8507/01/2016 3,989,633.85 14159282482 0.000 4,251,912.47 14,251,912.474,251,912.473,300,679.19Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund-Housing 1Local Agency Inv Fund1113 16,164,188.47 16,164,188.47 2.29116,119,719.09 125-33-005 2.291 16,164,188.47 116,119,719.0916,164,188.4716,164,188.47Subtotal and Average 1 2.291 Local Agency Investment Fund-City 1Local Agency Inv Fund1055 44,410,563.09 44,410,563.09 2.29144,318,062.14 198-33-434 2.291 44,410,563.09 144,318,062.1444,410,563.0945,184,756.64Subtotal and Average 1 2.291 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 192Federal Farm Credit Bank1092 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 07/12/20191.08007/10/2017 992,300.00 7323133EGLC7 1.456 974Federal Farm Credit Bank1105 1,000,000.00 992,200.00 09/01/20211.70011/09/2017 977,560.00 1,3923133EHWM1 1.913 170Federal Farm Credit Bank1141 500,000.00 494,750.00 06/20/20191.21005/31/2018 496,920.00 3853133EGFU4 2.224 493Federal Farm Credit Bank1142 500,000.00 491,750.00 05/08/20201.55005/31/2018 493,140.00 7083133EHJA2 2.427 1,708Federal Farm Credit Bank1158 250,000.00 247,275.00 09/05/20232.80010/15/2018 250,542.50 1,7863133EJYL7 3.041 848Federal Home Loan Bank1053 2,500,000.00 2,491,250.00 04/28/20211.35004/28/2016 2,434,775.00 1,8263130A7QZ1 1.423 664Federal Home Loan Bank1064 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 10/26/20201.37510/26/2016 2,447,825.00 1,4613130A9UQ2 1.375 619Federal Home Loan Bank1104 1,000,000.00 996,800.00 09/11/20201.62511/09/2017 984,540.00 1,0373130A66T9 1.741 1,519Federal Home Loan Bank1121 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 02/28/20232.37504/02/2018 999,650.00 1,7933130ADMF6 3.111 848Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1054 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 04/28/20211.50004/28/2016 2,476,400.00 1,8263134G8Y37 1.400 1,183Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1073 2,000,000.00 1,990,000.00 03/29/20222.00003/29/2017 1,964,280.00 1,8263134GBAE2 2.106 1,093Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1084 1,000,000.00 999,500.00 12/29/20212.00007/06/2017 984,040.00 1,6373134GBXF4 2.012 1,303Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1090 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 07/27/20222.15007/27/2017 981,730.00 1,8263134GBWG3 2.150 1,490Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1116 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 01/30/20232.55001/30/2018 991,590.00 1,8263134GSCD5 2.550 1,514Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1122 750,000.00 746,625.00 02/23/20232.75004/02/2018 750,015.00 1,7883134GSCQ6 2.849 104Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1129 500,000.00 495,250.00 04/15/20191.12505/10/2018 498,135.00 3403137EADZ9 2.161 1,365Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp1156 400,000.00 398,800.00 09/27/20223.00010/15/2018 401,004.00 1,4433134GSWS0 3.081 391Federal National Mtg Assn1072 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 01/27/20201.70003/27/2017 1,980,440.00 1,0363135G0S53 1.700 254Federal National Mtg Assn1139 500,000.00 496,700.00 09/12/20191.75005/31/2018 496,945.00 4693135G0ZG1 2.275 213Federal National Mtg Assn1140 500,000.00 492,000.00 08/02/20190.87505/31/2018 494,950.00 4283135G0N33 2.269 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:47 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 58 Days to Maturity Page 2 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date 22,324,500.00 1,44222,096,781.5022,400,000.0022,324,500.00Subtotal and Average 847 1.912 Treasury Coupon Securities 911U.S. Treasury1045 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/30/20211.12507/18/2016 4,839,250.00 1,808912828S27 1.125 455U.S. Treasury1068 2,500,000.00 2,483,250.00 03/31/20201.37503/20/2017 2,463,275.00 1,107912828J84 1.602 348U.S. Treasury1069 2,500,000.00 2,490,750.00 12/15/20191.37503/20/2017 2,470,225.00 1,000912828U73 1.513 1,034U.S. Treasury1070 2,000,000.00 1,942,800.00 10/31/20211.25003/27/2017 1,933,280.00 1,679912828T67 1.903 592U.S. Treasury1117 1,000,000.00 985,800.00 08/15/20201.50001/22/2018 983,630.00 9369128282Q2 2.071 150U.S. Treasury1130 1,000,000.00 992,600.00 05/31/20191.50005/10/2018 995,940.00 386912828WL0 2.211 485U.S. Treasury1138 500,000.00 488,250.00 04/30/20201.12505/31/2018 490,585.00 700912828VA5 2.387 14,383,450.00 1,33414,176,185.0014,500,000.0014,383,450.00Subtotal and Average 663 1.562 Certificate of Deposits 139First Business Bank1019 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/20/2014 239,289.60 1,82631938QH72 1.751 324First Farmers Bank &Trust Co.1091 240,000.00 240,000.00 11/21/20191.65007/21/2017 237,828.00 853320165HX4 1.653 1,661First National Bank of America1147 245,000.00 245,000.00 07/20/20233.15007/20/2018 241,155.95 1,82632110YLK9 3.152 1,0511st Source Bank1168 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/17/20213.15012/17/2018 244,720.70 1,06633646CKP8 3.153 657First Tech Federal Credit Unio1124 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20202.70004/18/2018 243,740.70 91533715LBJ8 2.623 1,126Third Federal Savings and Loan1112 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/31/20222.50001/30/2018 239,781.50 1,46288413QBY3 2.502 1,259Allegiance Bank1143 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/13/20223.10006/13/2018 243,267.85 1,46101748DBE5 3.102 1,381Alliance Credit Union1095 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/13/20222.25010/13/2017 235,079.95 1,82601859BAA3 2.251 839Amex Centurion1077 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/19/20212.25004/19/2017 234,686.40 1,46102587DP85 2.252 1,336American Express Fed Savings B1096 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/29/20222.40008/29/2017 230,301.60 1,82602587CFU9 2.402 1,541Aneca Federal Credit Union1119 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/22/20232.80003/22/2018 238,502.60 1,826034577AH9 2.802 1,393Barclays Bank1097 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/25/20222.30010/25/2017 230,563.20 1,82606740KLJ4 2.291 1,823Bar Harbor Bank and Trust1172 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/29/20233.35012/31/2018 245,366.24 1,824SYS1172066851WJ 3.352 1,056Belmont Savings Bank1102 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/22/20212.10011/21/2017 237,598.55 1,462080515CD9 2.101 1,150BMW Bank1067 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/24/20222.20002/24/2017 232,528.80 1,82605580AGK4 2.201 744Bankers Bank1086 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/14/20211.80007/14/2017 234,002.40 1,28006610RAP4 1.804 888Capital One Natl Assn FDIC42971082 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/07/20212.25006/07/2017 235,104.00 1,46114042RGD7 2.252 526Capital One USA FDIC339541006 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/10/20201.90006/10/2015 241,810.10 1,827140420RX0 1.902 783Comenity Capital Bank1009 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/22/20211.70002/22/2016 233,126.40 1,82720033APG5 1.702 1,561Citibank NA1123 245,000.00 245,000.00 04/11/20232.90004/11/2018 239,320.90 1,82617312QJ26 2.902 143City National Bank of Florida1132 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/24/20192.20005/24/2018 239,666.40 36517801DDT0 2.200 925Central State Bank1085 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20211.85007/14/2017 232,454.40 1,46115523RBJ4 1.851 1,779Commercial Bank1162 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/15/20233.40011/15/2018 246,157.36 1,82620143PDV9 3.402 155Connect One1011 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20191.50006/05/2015 247,055.12 1,46120786ABD6 1.501 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:47 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 59 Days to Maturity Page 3 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,417CrossFirst Bank1106 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20222.20011/20/2017 234,122.00 1,82422766ACB9 2.201 1,127Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF1066 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/01/20222.25002/01/2017 233,128.80 1,8262546722U1 2.251 385Douglas National Bank1093 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/21/20201.65007/19/2017 237,261.60 916259744DS6 1.655 750Eagle Bank1146 245,000.00 245,000.00 01/20/20212.85007/20/2018 243,936.70 91527002YDV5 2.858 1,578EnerBank USA1125 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/28/20232.95004/30/2018 234,770.40 1,82429278TAY6 2.952 1,427Enterprise Bank, NA1107 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/28/20222.15011/28/2017 233,551.15 1,82629367QCP1 2.151 119Ephrata Bank1016 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20191.65004/30/2014 239,604.00 1,826294209AQ4 1.651 521EverBank1017248,000.00 248,000.00 06/05/20201.70006/05/2015 243,955.12 1,82729976DXX3 1.702 748Farm Bureau Bank1165 248,000.00 248,000.00 01/18/20213.00012/17/2018 247,667.68 763307660LC2 2.898 35Farmers & Merch1018 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/05/20191.25006/05/2015 247,761.92 1,341307814DC4 1.252 1,214Farmers Insurance Group FCU1126 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/29/20222.80004/30/2018 236,306.40 1,46030960QAG2 2.802 721Freedom Credit Union1111 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/22/20202.05012/22/2017 240,315.60 1,09635638BAA9 2.052 139Gulf Coast Bank1024 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/20/20191.75005/19/2014 239,292.00 1,827402194EB6 1.724 958General Electric Credit Union1150 240,000.00 240,000.00 08/16/20213.10008/15/2018 239,676.00 1,097369674AV8 3.100 1,211Goldman Sachs1078 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/26/20222.40004/26/2017 233,352.00 1,82638148PJK4 2.401 559First Bank of Highland1094 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/13/20201.75007/13/2017 235,867.20 1,096319141GT8 1.752 1,290HSBC Bank USA, National Associ1088 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/14/20222.30007/14/2017 231,760.80 1,82640434YLE5 2.301 1,752Jefferson Financial CU1154 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/19/20233.35010/19/2018 242,775.40 1,826474067AQ8 3.352 497Jefferson Bank & Trust1100 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/12/20201.75011/09/2017 241,400.95 915472376AC6 1.751 1,232Kansas State Bank1101 245,000.00 245,000.00 05/17/20222.10011/17/2017 235,606.70 1,64250116CBE8 2.099 1,458Knoxville TVA Credit Union1110 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/29/20222.40012/29/2017 235,420.50 1,826499724AB8 2.401 1,154Maine Savings FCU1171 248,000.00 248,000.00 02/28/20223.30012/28/2018 248,381.92 1,158560507AK1 3.306 1,750Marlin Business Bank1155 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/17/20233.30010/17/2018 245,207.52 1,82657116ARV2 3.302 1,436Medallion Bank1169 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.40012/07/2018 247,687.52 1,46158404DCX7 3.402 553Mercantile Bank of Michigan1087 240,000.00 240,000.00 07/07/20201.75007/07/2017 235,932.00 1,09658740XZL7 1.752 59Metabank Sioux Falls1133 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/01/20192.05005/15/2018 244,902.00 29059101LDR5 2.057 528Bank Midwest1002 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/12/20201.65006/12/2015 243,687.28 1,827063615AVO 1.652 321Morgan Stanley Bank1109 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.80011/16/2017 243,138.00 73261747MA92 1.800 1,396Merrick Bank1163 248,000.00 248,000.00 10/28/20223.25010/30/2018 246,596.32 1,45959013J4K2 3.252 321Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA1108 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/18/20191.75011/16/2017 243,032.65 73261760AEP0 1.750 1,407Mountain America Federal CU1099 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/08/20222.30011/08/2017 235,143.65 1,82662384RAC0 2.301 1,750Municipal Trust and Savings1160 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.20010/17/2018 241,160.85 1,826625925AR3 3.202 1,085Neighbors FCU1167 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20213.20012/21/2018 244,958.35 1,09664017AAQ7 3.203 1,815National Cooperative Bank, N.A1170 245,000.00 245,000.00 12/21/20233.40012/21/2018 243,010.60 1,826635573AL2 3.402 1,792Numerica Credit Union1164 248,000.00 248,000.00 11/28/20233.55011/28/2018 247,766.88 1,82667054NAN3 3.552 1,029Northpointe Bank1127 240,000.00 240,000.00 10/26/20212.70004/26/2018 236,875.20 1,279666613GV0 2.703 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:47 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 60 Days to Maturity Page 4 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Certificate of Deposits 1,672Bank of New England1151 249,000.00 249,000.00 07/31/20233.25007/31/2018 246,081.72 1,82606426KAN8 3.252 55New York Community Bank1137 245,000.00 245,000.00 02/25/20192.05005/25/2018 244,899.55 276649447RL5 2.050 1,114The Ohio Valley Bank1089 240,000.00 240,000.00 01/19/20221.90007/19/2017 230,784.00 1,645677721CN0 1.903 1,254PCSB Bank1149 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/08/20223.00006/08/2018 242,498.55 1,46169324MAD7 3.002 147Peapack-Gladstone Bank1031 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/28/20191.80005/28/2014 239,488.80 1,826704692AL6 1.801 876PrivateBank & Trust1032 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/26/20211.50005/26/2016 231,595.20 1,82674267GVG9 1.501 1,631RCB Bank1144 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/20/20233.15006/20/2018 241,329.90 1,82674934YAH4 3.152 1,436Red Rocks Credit Union1166 248,000.00 248,000.00 12/07/20223.35012/07/2018 247,231.20 1,46175701LAB3 3.352 692First Bank Richmond1081 245,000.00 245,000.00 11/23/20201.80006/21/2017 239,475.25 1,251319267GC8 1.802 247Riverwood1034248,000.00 248,000.00 09/05/20191.40006/05/2015 246,529.36 1,55376951DAL4 1.402 1,267Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake CIty1083 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/21/20222.35006/21/2017 232,387.20 1,826795450A70 2.351 154Solomon State1035 248,000.00 248,000.00 06/04/20191.40006/04/2015 247,062.56 1,46183427LAX2 1.401 476Stearnes Bank, N.A.1076 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/21/20201.60004/21/2017 236,217.60 1,096857894TC3 1.588 1,248Synchrony Bank Retail1080 240,000.00 240,000.00 06/02/20222.40006/02/2017 232,975.20 1,82687164XQV1 2.401 850Towne Bank1128 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/30/20212.80004/30/2018 238,336.80 1,09689214PBL2 2.803 1,315Traditions Bank1148 245,000.00 245,000.00 08/08/20223.00006/08/2018 242,052.65 1,52289269CBX9 3.002 1,750UBS Bank USA1161 245,000.00 245,000.00 10/17/20233.35010/17/2018 242,780.30 1,82690348JEJ5 3.352 135Union BankNA1136 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/16/20192.20005/16/2018 239,690.40 36590521AQW1 2.200 805Unity Bank1120 245,000.00 245,000.00 03/16/20212.55003/16/2018 242,172.70 1,09691330ABN6 2.552 1,595University of Iowa Comm. CU1134 240,000.00 240,000.00 05/15/20233.05005/14/2018 235,632.00 1,82791435LAG2 3.052 112Webster Bank1042 240,000.00 240,000.00 04/23/20191.80004/23/2014 239,623.20 1,82694768NJQ8 1.801 56Wells Fargo1043 240,000.00 240,000.00 02/26/20191.20002/26/2016 239,760.00 1,0969497483N5 1.201 531Wex Bank1145 245,000.00 245,000.00 06/15/20202.75006/13/2018 244,551.65 73392937CHG6 2.754 20,214,000.00 1,45519,901,278.1720,214,000.0019,317,483.87Subtotal and Average 956 2.397 Corporate Notes 946Apple Inc1079 500,000.00 493,050.00 08/04/20211.55006/12/2017 484,795.00 1,514037833CC2 1.900 59Johnson and Johnson Corp1075 2,000,000.00 1,993,200.00 03/01/20191.12503/29/2017 1,994,740.00 702478160BR4 1.305 401Microsoft Corporation1118 500,000.00 497,700.00 02/06/20201.85001/22/2018 496,370.00 745594918BV5 2.081 1,680Microsoft Corporation1157 400,000.00 378,360.00 08/08/20232.00010/15/2018 384,584.00 1,758594918BQ6 3.222 1,132Proctor and Gamble1159 500,000.00 487,950.00 02/06/20222.30010/15/2018 492,230.00 1,210742718DY2 3.071 290Toyota Motor Credit Corp1098 500,000.00 498,750.00 10/18/20191.55011/07/2017 494,155.00 71089236TDH5 1.681 4,349,010.00 9494,346,874.004,400,000.004,349,010.00Subtotal and Average 487 1.869 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:47 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 61 Days to Maturity Page 5 Par Value Book Value Maturity Date Stated RateMarket Value December 31, 2018 Portfolio Details - Investments Average BalanceIssuer Portfolio Management City of La Quinta YTM 365TermCUSIPInvestment # Purchase Date Money Market Accounts 1California Asset Management Pr1153 2,007,042.21 2,007,042.2109/26/2018 2,007,042.21 1SYS1153 0.000 2,007,042.21 12,007,042.212,007,042.211,359,106.42Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1US Bank1058 5,683.67 5,683.6707/01/2016 5,683.67 1SYS1058 0.000 5,683.67 15,683.675,683.675,676.67Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 Managed Pool Accounts-OPEB Trust 1CalPERS CERBT Plan1114 1,447,463.50 1,447,463.5007/01/2018 1,447,463.50 1SYS1114 0.000 1,447,463.50 11,447,463.501,447,463.501,538,699.06Subtotal and Average 1 0.000 656127,927,550.33 129,800,853.41 386 2.011128,671,001.75 129,557,813.41Total and Average Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 11:47 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 62 City of La Quinta Total Earnings City of La Quinta - Sorted by Fund - Fund December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted InterestAnnualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 496,700.001139500,000.00 1.750FNMA 729.17 0.00 729.171.728101496,700.003135G0ZG1 0.00 2,000,000.0010722,000,000.00 1.700FNMA 2,833.33 0.00 2,833.331.6681012,000,000.003135G0S53 0.00 492,000.001140500,000.00 0.875FNMA 364.58 0.00 364.580.872101492,000.003135G0N33 0.00 1,000,000.0011161,000,000.00 2.550FHLMC 2,125.00 0.00 2,125.002.5021011,000,000.003134GSCD5 0.00 1,000,000.0010901,000,000.00 2.150FHLMC 1,791.66 0.00 1,791.662.1101011,000,000.003134GBWG3 0.00 2,500,000.0010542,500,000.00 1.500FHLMC 3,125.00 0.00 3,125.001.4721012,500,000.003134G8Y37 0.00 999,500.0010841,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 1,666.67 0.00 1,666.671.963101999,500.003134GBXF4 0.00 1,990,000.0010732,000,000.00 2.000FHLMC 3,333.33 0.00 3,333.331.9721011,990,000.003134GBAE2 0.00 495,250.001129500,000.00 1.125FHLMC 468.75 0.00 468.751.114101495,250.003137EADZ9 0.00 746,625.001122750,000.00 2.750FHLMC 1,718.75 0.00 1,718.752.710101746,625.003134GSCQ6 0.00 398,800.001156400,000.00 3.000FHLMC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.002.952101398,800.003134GSWS0 0.00 992,200.0011051,000,000.00 1.700FFCB 1,416.67 0.00 1,416.671.681101992,200.003133EHWM1 0.00 494,750.001141500,000.00 1.210FFCB 504.17 0.00 504.171.200101494,750.003133EGFU4 0.00 992,600.0010921,000,000.00 1.080FFCB 900.00 0.00 900.001.068101992,600.003133EGLC7 0.00 491,750.001142500,000.00 1.550FFCB 645.83 0.00 645.831.546101491,750.003133EHJA2 0.00 247,275.001158250,000.00 2.800FFCB 583.34 0.00 583.342.778101247,275.003133EJYL7 0.00 2,491,250.0010532,500,000.00 1.350FHLB 2,812.50 0.00 2,812.501.3291012,491,250.003130A7QZ1 0.00 996,800.0011041,000,000.00 1.625FHLB 1,354.17 0.00 1,354.171.600101996,800.003130A66T9 0.00 2,500,000.0010642,500,000.00 1.375FHLB 2,864.59 0.00 2,864.591.3491012,500,000.003130A9UQ2 0.00 999,000.0011211,000,000.00 2.375FHLB 1,979.16 0.00 1,979.162.333101999,000.003130ADMF6 0.00 2,483,250.0010682,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,927.54 0.00 2,927.541.3881012,483,250.00912828J84 0.00 1,942,800.0010702,000,000.00 1.250USTR 2,140.89 0.00 2,140.891.2971011,942,800.00912828T67 0.00 2,490,750.0010692,500,000.00 1.375USTR 2,920.32 0.00 2,920.321.3801012,490,750.00912828U73 0.00 985,800.0011171,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,263.59 0.00 1,263.591.509101985,800.009128282Q2 0.00 488,250.001138500,000.00 1.125USTR 481.70 0.00 481.701.162101488,250.00912828VA5 0.00 992,600.0011301,000,000.00 1.500USTR 1,277.47 0.00 1,277.471.515101992,600.00912828WL0 0.00 5,000,000.0010455,000,000.00 1.125USTR 4,740.99 0.00 4,740.991.1161015,000,000.00912828S27 0.00 240,000.001043240,000.00 1.200WELLS 244.61 0.00 244.611.200101240,000.009497483N5 0.00 3,989,633.8510573,989,633.85WELLS 0.01 0.00 0.011012,565,606.454159282482 0.00 240,000.001078240,000.00 2.400GLDMAN 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0038148PJK4 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:38 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.163 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 2 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001077240,000.00 2.250AMEX 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0002587DP85 0.00 240,000.001042240,000.00 1.800WEB 366.91 0.00 366.911.800101240,000.0094768NJQ8 0.00 240,000.001067240,000.00 2.200BMW 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0005580AGK4 0.00 248,000.001169248,000.00 3.400MEDBA 554.43 0.00 554.433.4001010.0058404DCX7 0.00 240,000.001097240,000.00 2.300BARCLY 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0006740KLJ4 0.00 245,000.001112245,000.00 2.5003RD 520.21 0.00 520.212.500101245,000.0088413QBY3 0.00 240,000.001016240,000.00 1.650EPHRAT 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00294209AQ4 0.00 248,000.001163248,000.00 3.250MRRCK 684.55 0.00 684.553.250101248,000.0059013J4K2 0.00 240,000.001019240,000.00 1.7501STBUS 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.0031938QH72 0.00 240,000.001024240,000.00 1.750GCB 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.00402194EB6 0.00 240,000.001031240,000.00 1.800PEAPAC 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.00704692AL6 0.00 240,000.001128240,000.00 2.800TOWNE 570.74 0.00 570.742.800101240,000.0089214PBL2 0.00 0.0010300.00 1.250MORTN 93.42 0.00 93.421.250101248,000.00619165GE7 0.00 248,000.001018248,000.00 1.250FARMER 263.28 0.00 263.281.250101248,000.00307814DC4 0.00 248,000.001035248,000.00 1.400SOLOM 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.0083427LAX2 0.00 248,000.001011248,000.00 1.500CONNEC 315.95 0.00 315.951.500101248,000.0020786ABD6 0.00 248,000.001034248,000.00 1.400RVRW 294.88 0.00 294.881.400101248,000.0076951DAL4 0.00 248,000.001017248,000.00 1.700EVRBA 358.07 0.00 358.071.700101248,000.0029976DXX3 0.00 245,000.001006245,000.00 1.900CAPONE 395.36 0.00 395.361.900101245,000.00140420RX0 0.00 248,000.001002248,000.00 1.650MIDWES 347.54 0.00 347.541.650101248,000.00063615AVO 0.00 0.0010010.00 1.700ALLY 257.10 0.00 257.101.700101240,000.0002006LWX7 0.00 240,000.001009240,000.00 1.700CCBA 346.52 0.00 346.521.700101240,000.0020033APG5 0.00 240,000.001032240,000.00 1.500PRVTBA 305.75 0.00 305.751.500101240,000.0074267GVG9 0.00 44,410,563.09105544,410,563.09 2.291LAIF 92,079.11 0.00 92,079.112.39910146,410,563.0998-33-434 0.00 240,000.001066240,000.00 2.250DISCOV 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.002546722U1 0.00 1,993,200.0010752,000,000.00 1.125J&J 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.001.1081011,993,200.00478160BR4 0.00 240,000.001076240,000.00 1.600STRNS 326.14 0.00 326.141.600101240,000.00857894TC3 0.00 493,050.001079500,000.00 1.550APPL 645.83 0.00 645.831.542101493,050.00037833CC2 0.00 240,000.001080240,000.00 2.400SYNCHR 489.21 0.00 489.212.400101240,000.0087164XQV1 0.00 245,000.001081245,000.00 1.800RICHMN 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.00319267GC8 0.00 240,000.001082240,000.00 2.250CAP1NA 458.63 0.00 458.632.250101240,000.0014042RGD7 0.00 240,000.001083240,000.00 2.350SALMAE 479.02 0.00 479.022.350101240,000.00795450A70 0.00 240,000.001085240,000.00 1.850CNTRL 377.10 0.00 377.101.850101240,000.0015523RBJ4 0.00 240,000.001086240,000.00 1.800BNKRS 366.90 0.00 366.901.800101240,000.0006610RAP4 0.00 240,000.001087240,000.00 1.750MERCTL 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.0058740XZL7 0.00 240,000.001088240,000.00 2.300HSBC 468.82 0.00 468.822.300101240,000.0040434YLE5 0.00 240,000.001089240,000.00 1.900OHVAL 387.28 0.00 387.281.900101240,000.00677721CN0 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:38 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.164 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 3 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 240,000.001091240,000.00 1.6501STFRM 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00320165HX4 0.00 240,000.001093240,000.00 1.650DOUGLS 336.33 0.00 336.331.650101240,000.00259744DS6 0.00 240,000.001094240,000.00 1.750HIGHLD 356.71 0.00 356.711.750101240,000.00319141GT8 0.00 245,000.001095245,000.00 2.250ALLIAN 468.19 0.00 468.192.250101245,000.0001859BAA3 0.00 240,000.001096240,000.00 2.400AMFSB 489.20 0.00 489.202.400101240,000.0002587CFU9 0.00 498,750.001098500,000.00 1.550TOYOTA 645.84 0.00 645.841.525101498,750.0089236TDH5 0.00 245,000.001099245,000.00 2.300MTNAMR 478.59 0.00 478.592.300101245,000.0062384RAC0 0.00 245,000.001100245,000.00 1.750JFFRSN 364.15 0.00 364.151.750101245,000.00472376AC6 0.00 245,000.001101245,000.00 2.100KANSAS 436.97 0.00 436.972.100101245,000.0050116CBE8 0.00 245,000.001102245,000.00 2.100BELMNT 436.98 0.00 436.982.100101245,000.00080515CD9 0.00 245,000.001106245,000.00 2.200CRS1ST 457.78 0.00 457.782.200101245,000.0022766ACB9 0.00 245,000.001107245,000.00 2.150ENTRPR 447.38 0.00 447.382.150101245,000.0029367QCP1 0.00 245,000.001108245,000.00 1.750MSPRIV 364.14 0.00 364.141.750101245,000.0061760AEP0 0.00 245,000.001109245,000.00 1.800MORGST 374.55 0.00 374.551.800101245,000.0061747MA92 0.00 245,000.001110245,000.00 2.400KNOX 499.40 0.00 499.402.400101245,000.00499724AB8 0.00 245,000.001111245,000.00 2.050FREECU 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0035638BAA9 0.00 3,300.0010593,300.00CITYPC 0.00 0.00 0.001013,300.00SYS1059 0.00 1,447,463.5011141,447,463.50CALPRS 0.00 0.00 0.001011,541,740.25SYS1114 0.00 378,360.001157400,000.00 2.000MCRSFT 666.67 0.00 666.672.075101378,360.00594918BQ6 0.00 497,700.001118500,000.00 1.850MCRSFT 770.83 0.00 770.831.824101497,700.00594918BV5 0.00 245,000.001119245,000.00 2.800ANECA 582.63 0.00 582.632.800101245,000.00034577AH9 0.00 245,000.001120245,000.00 2.550UNITY 530.61 0.00 530.612.550101245,000.0091330ABN6 0.00 245,000.001123245,000.00 2.900CITINA 603.43 0.00 603.432.900101245,000.0017312QJ26 0.00 245,000.001124245,000.00 2.7001STTCH 561.82 0.00 561.822.700101245,000.0033715LBJ8 0.00 240,000.001125240,000.00 2.950ENER 601.32 0.00 601.322.950101240,000.0029278TAY6 0.00 240,000.001126240,000.00 2.800FARMIG 570.73 0.00 570.732.800101240,000.0030960QAG2 0.00 240,000.001127240,000.00 2.700NORPNT 550.35 0.00 550.352.700101240,000.00666613GV0 0.00 240,000.001132240,000.00 2.200CNBF 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0017801DDT0 0.00 245,000.001133245,000.00 2.050METASF 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.0059101LDR5 0.00 240,000.001134240,000.00 3.050UOFICU 621.70 0.00 621.703.050101240,000.0091435LAG2 0.00 245,000.001137245,000.00 2.050NYCMBK 426.57 0.00 426.572.050101245,000.00649447RL5 0.00 240,000.001136240,000.00 2.200UNION 448.44 0.00 448.442.200101240,000.0090521AQW1 0.00 245,000.001143245,000.00 3.100ALLGNC 645.05 0.00 645.053.100101245,000.0001748DBE5 0.00 245,000.001144245,000.00 3.150RCB 655.45 0.00 655.453.150101245,000.0074934YAH4 0.00 245,000.001145245,000.00 2.750WEX 572.23 0.00 572.232.750101245,000.0092937CHG6 0.00 245,000.001146245,000.00 2.850EAGLE 593.03 0.00 593.032.850101245,000.0027002YDV5 0.00 245,000.001147245,000.00 3.1501STNBA 655.46 0.00 655.463.150101245,000.0032110YLK9 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:38 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.165 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 4 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss Fund: General Fund 245,000.001148245,000.00 3.000TRAD 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0089269CBX9 0.00 245,000.001149245,000.00 3.000PCSB 624.25 0.00 624.253.000101245,000.0069324MAD7 0.00 240,000.001150240,000.00 3.100GECRUN 631.90 0.00 631.903.100101240,000.00369674AV8 0.00 249,000.001151249,000.00 3.250NWENGL 687.31 0.00 687.313.250101249,000.0006426KAN8 0.00 2,007,042.2111532,007,042.21CAMP 2,866.98 0.00 2,866.982.4841011,004,175.23SYS1153 0.00 245,000.001154245,000.00 3.350JEFF 697.08 0.00 697.083.350101245,000.00474067AQ8 0.00 248,000.001155248,000.00 3.300MARBUS 695.08 0.00 695.083.300101248,000.0057116ARV2 0.00 487,950.001159500,000.00 2.300P&G 958.33 0.00 958.332.312101487,950.00742718DY2 0.00 245,000.001160245,000.00 3.200MUNTRS 665.86 0.00 665.863.200101245,000.00625925AR3 0.00 245,000.001161245,000.00 3.350UBS 697.07 0.00 697.073.350101245,000.0090348JEJ5 0.00 248,000.001162248,000.00 3.400COMMBK 716.14 0.00 716.143.400101248,000.0020143PDV9 0.00 248,000.001164248,000.00 3.550NMRCA 747.74 0.00 747.743.550101248,000.0067054NAN3 0.00 248,000.001165248,000.00 3.000FARMBU 285.37 0.00 285.373.0001010.00307660LC2 0.00 248,000.001166248,000.00 3.350REDRCK 546.28 0.00 546.283.3501010.0075701LAB3 0.00 245,000.001167245,000.00 3.200NEIGH 236.27 0.00 236.273.2001010.0064017AAQ7 0.00 245,000.001168245,000.00 3.1501STSRC 317.16 0.00 317.163.1501010.0033646CKP8 0.00 245,000.001170245,000.00 3.400NLCOOP 251.04 0.00 251.043.4001010.00635573AL2 0.00 248,000.001171248,000.00 3.300MAINE 67.27 0.00 67.273.3001010.00560507AK1 0.00 248,000.001172248,000.00 3.350BARHAR 0.00 0.00 0.001010.00SYS1172066851 0.00 113,372,002.65Subtotal 113,128,962.65 1.980 186,773.880.00186,773.88111,309,345.02 0.00 Fund: 1st Empire Securities Cash Bal 0.0010600.00EMPIRE 411.95 0.00 411.951.095102500,000.00SYS1060 0.00 0.00Subtotal 0.00 1.095 411.950.00411.95500,000.00 0.00 Fund: Fiscal Agent 5,683.6710585,683.67USBANK 7.23 0.00 7.231.5002315,676.44SYS1058 0.00 5,683.67Subtotal 5,683.67 1.500 7.230.007.235,676.44 0.00 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ 258,978.621062258,978.62LQPR 0.00 0.00 0.00241242,547.25SYS1062 0.00 258,978.62Subtotal 258,978.62 0.000.000.00242,547.25 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 16,164,188.47111316,164,188.47 2.291LAIF 32,939.96 0.00 32,939.962.39924916,164,188.4725-33-005 0.00 16,164,188.47Subtotal 16,164,188.47 2.399 32,939.960.0032,939.9616,164,188.47 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:38 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.166 Current Rate Ending Par Value Ending Fund Page 5 Book Value Beginning Book Value Adjusted Interest Earnings Accretion Amortization/ Earnings Adjusted Interest December 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Total Earnings City of La Quinta Annualized YieldCUSIP Investment # Interest EarnedIssuer Realized Gainl/Loss 129,800,853.41Total 129,557,813.41 2.026 220,133.020.00220,133.02128,221,757.18 0.00 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/07/2019 - 14:38 TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.167 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Maturity Report Sorted by Maturity Date Received or due during October 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Rate at MaturityPar Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity Date Maturity ProceedsInterest Income Net CUSIP Investment #Issuer Purchase Date Book Value at Maturity 2,500,000.00 0.875 2,510,937.5010,937.5010/24/2016USTR1063912828L81TRC10110/15/2018 8,687.502,502,250.00 240,000.00 1.500 241,804.931,804.9304/30/20141STMER102032082BDF3MC110110/30/2018 1,804.93240,000.00 500,000.00 1.250 503,125.003,125.0011/09/2017USTR1103912828M64TRC10111/15/2018 4,285.00498,840.00 500,000.00 1.250 503,125.003,125.0005/10/2018USTR1131912828A34TRC10111/30/2018 5,125.00498,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 248,254.79254.7906/12/2015MORTN1030619165GE7MC110112/12/2018 254.79248,000.00 240,000.00 1.700 242,045.592,045.5912/24/2015ALLY100102006LWX7MC110112/24/2018 2,045.59240,000.00 4,249,292.81Total Maturities 4,228,000.00 21,292.814,227,090.00 22,202.81 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 14:27 MA (PRF_MA) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.168 City of La Quinta -City of La Quinta Purchases Report Sorted by Fund - Fund October 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 Original Par Value Ending Book Value Sec. TypeFund Maturity YTM Accrued Interest at PurchasePayment Periods DateCUSIPInvestment #Issuer Purchase Date Principal Purchased Rate at Purchase General Fund 250,000.00 2.800 09/05/2023 247,275.00247,275.00 Received10/15/2018 3.04103/05 - 09/05FFCB11583133EJYL7FAC101 400,000.00 3.000 09/27/2022 398,800.00398,800.00 Received10/15/2018 3.08103/27 - 09/27FHLMC11563134GSWS0FAC101 400,000.00 2.000 08/08/2023 378,360.00378,360.00 Received10/15/2018 3.22202/08 - 08/08MCRSFT1157594918BQ6MC2101 500,000.00 2.300 02/06/2022 487,950.00487,950.00 Received10/15/2018 3.07102/06 - 08/06P&G1159742718DY2MC2101 248,000.00 3.300 10/17/2023 248,000.00248,000.0010/17/2018 3.30211/17 - MonthlyMARBUS115557116ARV2MC1101 245,000.00 3.200 10/17/2023 245,000.00245,000.0010/17/2018 3.20211/17 - MonthlyMUNTRS1160625925AR3MC1101 245,000.00 3.350 10/17/2023 245,000.00245,000.0010/17/2018 3.35211/17 - MonthlyUBS116190348JEJ5MC1101 245,000.00 3.350 10/19/2023 245,000.00245,000.0010/19/2018 3.35204/19 - 10/19JEFF1154474067AQ8MC1101 248,000.00 3.250 10/28/2022 248,000.00248,000.0010/30/2018 3.25211/30 - MonthlyMRRCK116359013J4K2MC1101 248,000.00 3.400 11/15/2023 248,000.00248,000.0011/15/2018 3.40212/15 - MonthlyCOMMBK116220143PDV9MC1101 248,000.00 3.550 11/28/2023 248,000.00248,000.0011/28/2018 3.55212/28 - MonthlyNMRCA116467054NAN3MC1101 248,000.00 3.400 12/07/2022 248,000.00248,000.0012/07/2018 3.40201/07 - MonthlyMEDBA116958404DCX7MC1101 248,000.00 3.350 12/07/2022 248,000.00248,000.0012/07/2018 3.35201/07 - MonthlyREDRCK116675701LAB3MC1101 245,000.00 3.150 11/17/2021 245,000.00245,000.0012/17/2018 3.15306/17 - 12/171STSRC116833646CKP8MC1101 248,000.00 3.000 01/18/2021 248,000.00248,000.0012/17/2018 2.89801/17 - MonthlyFARMBU1165307660LC2MC1101 245,000.00 3.200 12/21/2021 245,000.00245,000.0012/21/2018 3.20306/21 - 12/21NEIGH116764017AAQ7MC1101 245,000.00 3.400 12/21/2023 245,000.00245,000.0012/21/2018 3.40206/21 - 12/21NLCOOP1170635573AL2MC1101 248,000.00 3.300 02/28/2022 248,000.00248,000.0012/28/2018 3.30601/28 - MonthlyMAINE1171560507AK1MC1101 248,000.00 3.350 12/29/2023 248,000.00248,000.0012/31/2018 3.35201/31 - MonthlyBARHAR1172SYS1172066851WJMC1101 Subtotal 5,214,385.005,214,385.00 0.005,252,000.00 5,214,385.00Total Purchases 5,252,000.00 0.00 5,214,385.00 Received = Accrued Interest at Purchase was received by report ending date. Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 02/04/2019 - 13:18 PU (PRF_PU) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.169 US Treasury Rates https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yieldYear&year=2018 Date 1 mo 3 mo 6 mo 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr 20 yr 30 yr 10/31/2018 2.2 2.34 2.49 2.69 2.87 2.93 2.98 3.07 3.15 3.3 3.39 11/30/2018 2.31 2.37 2.52 2.70 2.80 2.83 2.84 2.92 3.01 3.19 3.3 12/31/2018 2.44 2.45 2.56 2.63 2.48 2.46 2.51 2.59 2.69 2.87 3.02 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 2 yr 10 yr Commercial Paper Rates https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/cp/rates.htm 70 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JANUARY 25, AND FEBRUARY 1, 2019 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated January 25, and February 1, 2019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City 1,979,314.45$ Successor Agency of RDA 6,192.94$ Housing Authority -$ 1,985,507.39$ BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for January 25, and February 1, 2019. Warrants Issued: 121254-121310 253,326.75$ 121311-121406 1,397,314.16$ Wire Transfers 47,053.54$ Void (50.11)$ Payroll Tax transfers 54,529.62$ Payroll Direct Deposit 233,333.43$ 1,985,507.39$ In the amounts listed above, one check was voided due a check being issued that should have been a wire transfer. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 71 The most significant expenditures on the demand register are: Account Name Amount Riverside County Various 1,115,730.43$ Oct- Police Service Sheriff Bengal Engineering Design 123,226.26$ Dune Palms Rd Low Water crossing Greater Palm Springs GPSCVB 60,322.00$ Quarter 2 City CVB Funding Hermann Design Design 40,564.62$ Design Services Group SilverRock NAI Consulting Inc Various 34,482.53$ Dec - Professional Services PurposeVendor Wire Transfers: Five transfers totaled $47,054. Of this amount, $40,986 was for CalPERS, $3,861 for ICMA, and $1,720 for TASC. (See Attachment 2 for a full listing). Purchase Orders/Contracts During the quarterly periods starting July 1 through September 30, 2018 and October 1 through December 31, 2018, 13 purchase orders were issued in amounts ranging from $25,000 to $50,000 , for a total of $477,522 (Attachment 3). ALTERNATIVES Council may approve, partially approve, or reject the demand registers. Prepared by: Derrick Armendariz, Account Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Financial Services Analyst Attachments:1. Demand Registers 2.Wire Transfers 3.Purchase Orders 72 1/24/2019 6:46:07 PM Page 1 of 5 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT01863 - DA 01/25/2019 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 715.84Civic Center Lake Maintenance01/2019 FY 18-19 CIVIC CENTER PARK LAK…121255ALL VALLEY BBQ, SPA & PATIO…101-3005-60117 545.00Community Experiences01/14/19 - TOAST OF LQ INSURANCE121256ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES …101-3003-60149 140.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/15/18 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL TESTING121257AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES …101-2001-60174 190.35Operating Supplies01/14-01/17/19 - WC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES121258AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC 101-3002-60420 43.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/14/18 - LA18309030 BLOOD/ALCOHOL…121261BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 548.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/14/18 - BLOOD/ALCOHOL TESTING121261BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 101-2001-60174 150.00Membership Dues04/01/19-03/31/20 - CPRS MEMBERSHIP …121262CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREAT…101-3005-60351 150.00Membership Dues04/01/19-03/31/20 - CPRS MEMBERSHIP -…121262CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREAT…101-3005-60351 196.05LT Care Insurance PayLONG TERM CARE121263CALPERS LONG-TERM CARE P…101-0000-20949 152.33Utilities - Water01/22/19 - WATER SERVICE121265COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-2002-61200 50.26Utilities - Water -Eisenhower P…01/22/19 - WATER SERVICE121265COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61203 39.70Utilities - Water -Velasco Park01/22/19 - WATER SERVICE121265COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61205 800.00Community Experiences02/08/19 - MUSEUM JAZZ QUARTET121266COLE, MATT 101-3003-60149 185.00Maintenance/Services01/02/19 - IRRIGATION CLOCK REPAIR121267CONSERVE LANDCARE 101-3005-60691 7.00Cash Over/Short01/11/19 - LIC-0109473 REFUND BL OVER…121268CROWN CASTLE USA INC 101-0000-42300 13.00Cash Over/Short01/11/19 - LIC-0109472 REFUND BL OVER…121268CROWN CASTLE USA INC 101-0000-42300 7.00Cash Over/Short01/11/2019 - LIC-0109475 REFUND BL OV…121268CROWN CASTLE USA INC 101-0000-42300 3.00Cash Over/Short01/11/2019 - LIC-0004206 REFUND BL OV…121268CROWN CASTLE USA INC 101-0000-42300 269.47Citywide Conf Room Supplies1/10/19 - CITYWIDE COFFEE121269DAIOHS FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 101-1007-60403 12,707.27Animal Shelter Contract Service11/2018 - ANIMAL SERVICES121270DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SER…101-6004-60197 60.17Subscriptions & Publications02/2019 - CITY HALL NEWSPAPER121272DESERT SUN, THE 101-6001-60352 224.00Fire Plan Review Fee01/10/19 - FSS2019-0002 REFUND121274DURAND FAMILY INC DBA ACT…101-0000-42420 420.00Plan Checks12/31/18 ON CALL BUILDING PLAN CHECK…121275ESGIL CORPORATION 101-6003-60118 50.11Garnishments PayableGARNISHMENT121276FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 101-0000-20985 124.70Professional Services01/2019 - ARMORED SERVICE121279GARDAWORLD 101-1006-60103 3,500.00Contract Services - Administrat…02/2019 FY18/19 STATE LOBBYING & AD…121280GONSALVES, JOE A & SON 101-1002-60101 60,322.00GPSCVB10/01/18 - FY 18-19 Q2 CITY FUNDING121281GREATER PALM SPRINGS CVB 101-3007-60151 520.00Plan Checks10/2018 ON CALL BUILDING PLAN CHECK …121283HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 101-6003-60118 415.80Map/Plan Checking11/2018 ON-CALL ENGINEERING PLAN CH…121283HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 101-7002-60183 1,755.00Plan ChecksFY 18/19 ON CALL BUILDING PLAN CHECK…121283HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 101-6003-60118 2,350.00Plan Checks11/2018 FY 18/19 ON CALL BLDG PLAN CH…121285INTERWEST CONSULTING GR…101-6003-60118 450.00Travel & Training01/15/19 - MMV TESTER CERTIFICATION121286JTB SUPPLY CO., INC.101-7006-60320 177.63LQ Police Volunteers01/22/19 - REIMB IRONMAN 12/09/18121287KLEMME, DENNIS 101-2001-60109 373.76Special Enforcement Funds12/04/18 - SPEED GUN REPAIR121288KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 101-2001-60175 4,582.50ConsultantsCIP DEV/MEASURE A 5YR CIP121291NAI CONSULTING INC 101-7006-60104 101.23Printing01/04/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES121292OFFICE DEPOT 101-2002-60410 35.09Repair & Maintenance - EOC01/04/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES121292OFFICE DEPOT 101-2002-60671 985.77Fire Service Costs01/11/19 - FIRE TEMP SERVICES121293OFFICE TEAM 101-2002-60139 8,900.88Marketing & Tourism Promoti…POCKET MAPS FY 18/19 PRINTING & PRO…121294PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3007-60461 700.00Community Experiences02/08/19 - TABLES FOR TOAST TO LQ121295PARTY TIME RENTALS 101-3003-60149 417.00Map/Plan Checking12/31/18 ON-CALL MAP CHECKING SERVI…121297RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 900.00Map/Plan Checking01/03/19 FY18/19 ON-CALL MAP CHECKI…121297RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 545.00Map/Plan Checking01/04/19 FY18/19 ON-CALL MAP CHECKI…121297RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 683.00Map/Plan Checking01/04/19 FY18/19 ON-CALL MAP CHECKI…121297RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 712.78Sheriff - Other10/24-11/24/18 - MOTOR COPS FUEL121298RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60176 616.68Sheriff - Other11/24-12/24/18 - MOTOR COPS FUEL121298RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60176 844.22Garnishments PayableGARNISHMENT121299RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S …101-0000-20985 200.00Garnishments PayableGARNISHMENT121300RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF C…101-0000-20985 400.00Community Experiences02/08/19 - SECURITY FOR TOAST TO LQ121301SERNA & ASSOCIATES 101-3003-60149 295.00LQ Park Water Feature01/2019 - LQ PARK WF SERVICE121302SHARK POOLS INC 101-3005-60554 488.75Fritz Burns Pool01/2019 - FB POOL SERVICE121302SHARK POOLS INC 101-3005-60184 407.50Fritz Burns Pool11/24/18 - FB POOL CHLOR TABS121302SHARK POOLS INC 101-3005-60184 209.59Operating Supplies12/19/18 - DEC LUNCHEON121303SMART & FINAL 101-3002-60420 ATTACHMENT 1 73 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01863 - DA 01/25/2019 1/24/2019 6:46:07 PM Page 2 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 65.24Travel & Training11/14/18 - SAFE WORKPLACE TRAINING121303SMART & FINAL 101-1004-60320 79.34Operating Supplies11/14/18 - THANKSGIVING LUNCHEON121303SMART & FINAL 101-3002-60420 67.08Citywide Conf Room Supplies01/12/19 - CITYWIDE SUPPLIES COFFEE121305STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1007-60403 46.81Office Supplies01/12/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES121305STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-6001-60400 199.95Office Supplies01/12/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES121305STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7003-60400 196.83Office Supplies01/16/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES121305STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-7003-60400 10,768.04Professional Services07/2018-09/2018 ON-CALL PLANNING SE…121306TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 7,631.12Professional Services10/2018 FY 18/19 ON-CALL PLANNING SE…121306TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 7,231.82Professional Services11/2018 FY 18/19 ON-CALL PLANNING SE…121306TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 71.52Utilities - Cable01/16-02/15/19 - FS# 32 CABLE SERVICE121307TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 42.00United Way DeductionsCONTRIBUTION121308UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 101-0000-20981 44.44Utilities - Telephone11/11-12/10/18 - LQ TICKET WRITERS121309VERIZON WIRELESS 101-2001-61300 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:136,124.62 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 339.75Materials/Supplies01/14/19 - DISCHARGE HOSE121254AIR & HOSE SOURCE, INC.201-7003-60431 1,546.95Traffic Control Signs01/03/19 - WAYWARD SIGNS (NO CHAMB…121260BEST SIGNS INC 201-7003-60429 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:1,886.70 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 2,605.44Utilities - Water - Medians01/22/19 - WATER SERVICE121265COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 419.81Utilities - Electric01/17/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE121284IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 24.68Utilities - Electric - Medians01/17/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICE121284IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 5,278.00SilverRock Way Landscape11/2018 FY 18/19 SRR PERIMETER LANDS…121289LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 5,278.00SilverRock Way Landscape12/2018 FY 18/19 SRR PERIMETER LANDS…121289LANDMARK GOLF MANAGEM…215-7004-60143 92.45Materials/Supplies01/09/19 - LANDSCAPE MATERIAL121304SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 122.57Operating Supplies01/10/19 - PLANTS121310VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 215-7004-60420 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:13,820.95 Fund: 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2,770.00Land AcquisitionFRONTIER PROPERTY WALL121291NAI CONSULTING INC 217-0000-74010 Fund 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Total:2,770.00 Fund: 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014) 927.00Relocation Benefits01/21/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS121264CARVER, JANE 248-9102-60159 34.87Relocation Benefits12/18-12/21/18 - WSA RELOCATION CALK…121284IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 248-9102-60159 Fund 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014) Total:961.87 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 688.77Construction12/07/18 - MMV TEST EQPT ANNUAL CALI…121259ATHENS TECHNICAL SPECIALIS…401-0000-60188 6,720.00Design09/29-10/26/18CALLE TAMPICO DRAIN I…121273DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 401-0000-60185 3,560.00Design10/26-11/30/18 TAMPICO DRAINAGE IMP…121273DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 401-0000-60185 2,342.50Design11/2018 ON-CALL PROF LANDSCAPE ARCH…121282HERMANN DESIGN GROUP INC 401-0000-60185 970.00Design12/12/18 ON-CALL PROF LANDSCAPE ARC…121282HERMANN DESIGN GROUP INC 401-0000-60185 230.00Design12/12/18 ON-CALL PROF LANDSCAPE ARC…121282HERMANN DESIGN GROUP INC 401-0000-60185 11,505.50Design11/30/18 ON-CALL PROF LANDSCAPE ARC…121282HERMANN DESIGN GROUP INC 401-0000-60185 25,516.62Design12/2018 SRR EVENT SITE DESIGN SVCS, PJT…121282HERMANN DESIGN GROUP INC 401-0000-60185 16,316.24Design11/2018 EISENHOWER DRAINAGE PRJ 201…121290MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIO…401-0000-60185 790.00Professional ServicesEISENHOWER RETENTION BASIN LANDSC…121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 435.00Professional ServicesCOVE PUBLIC RESTROOM121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 162.50Professional ServicesSB821 LQ HIGH SCHOOL ADA121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 580.00Professional ServicesWASHINGTON DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 145.00Professional ServicesCALLE TAMPICO DRAINAGE121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,915.00Professional ServicesAVENIDA BERMUDAS ADA IMPROVEMEN…121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 32.50Professional ServicesJEFFERSON-AVE 53 ROUNDABOUT121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 435.00Professional ServicesMADISON (AVE 50-AVE52)121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 703.21Professional ServicesHSIP INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 4,240.00Professional ServicesDUNE PALMS ST IMPROVEMENTS (WWR …121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 322.50Professional ServicesSILVERROCK INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVE…121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 6,379.32Professional ServicesLQ VILLAGE-A ROAD DIET PROJECT121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 705.00Professional ServicesPAVEMENT MGMT PLAN ST IMPROVEME…121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 195.00Professional ServicesHSOP TRAFF SIGNAL INTERCONNECT NET…121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,450.00Professional ServicesN LQ PARKWAY TURF CONVERSION121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 2,287.50Professional ServicesDUNE PALMS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 74 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01863 - DA 01/25/2019 1/24/2019 6:46:07 PM Page 3 of 5 AmountVendor Name Payment Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 1,917.50Professional ServicesEISENHOWER DRAINAGE121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 435.00Professional ServicesRETENTION BASIN (DPLM AT WWHO)121291NAI CONSULTING INC 401-0000-60103 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:94,979.66 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 688.94Fuel & Oil12/2018 - FUEL CHARGES121278FUELMAN 501-0000-60674 462.00Car Washes12/01/18 - VEHICLE WASHES121296RAN AUTO DETAIL 501-0000-60148 426.00Car Washes01/20/19 - VEHICLE WASHES121296RAN AUTO DETAIL 501-0000-60148 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:1,576.94 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 140.00Consultants01/15/19 - COUNCIL MTG VIDEO121271DESERT C.A.M INC 502-0000-60104 211.98Utilities - Telephone01/04-02/03/19 - DSL SERVICE121277FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…502-0000-61300 66.52Utilities - Telephone12/02/18-01/01/19 - BACK UP SERVER SVC121309VERIZON WIRELESS 502-0000-61300 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:418.50 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND 39.14Office Supplies01/10/19 - TONER121292OFFICE DEPOT 504-1010-60400 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total:39.14 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 648.65Bank Fees01/2019 - SRR ARMORED SERVICE121279GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 39.00Bank Fees12/2018 - SRR ARMORED SERVICE121279GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 60.72Bank Fees12/2018 - SRR ARMORED SERVICE121279GARDAWORLD 601-0000-60455 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total:748.37 Grand Total:253,326.75 75 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01863 - DA 01/25/2019 1/24/2019 6:46:07 PM Page 4 of 5 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 136,124.62 201 - GAS TAX FUND 1,886.70 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 13,820.95 217 - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2,770.00 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014)961.87 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 94,979.66 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,576.94 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 418.50 504 - INSURANCE FUND 39.14 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 748.37 Grand Total:253,326.75 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20949 LT Care Insurance Pay 196.05 101-0000-20981 United Way Deductions 42.00 101-0000-20985 Garnishments Payable 1,094.33 101-0000-42300 Cash Over/Short 30.00 101-0000-42420 Fire Plan Review Fee 224.00 101-1002-60101 Contract Services - Admini…3,500.00 101-1004-60320 Travel & Training 65.24 101-1006-60103 Professional Services 124.70 101-1007-60403 Citywide Conf Room Suppl…336.55 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 177.63 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 731.00 101-2001-60175 Special Enforcement Funds 373.76 101-2001-60176 Sheriff - Other 1,329.46 101-2001-61300 Utilities - Telephone 44.44 101-2002-60139 Fire Service Costs 985.77 101-2002-60410 Printing 101.23 101-2002-60671 Repair & Maintenance - E…35.09 101-2002-61200 Utilities - Water 152.33 101-2002-61400 Utilities - Cable 71.52 101-3002-60420 Operating Supplies 479.28 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 2,445.00 101-3005-60117 Civic Center Lake Mainten…715.84 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool 896.25 101-3005-60351 Membership Dues 300.00 101-3005-60554 LQ Park Water Feature 295.00 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 185.00 101-3005-61203 Utilities - Water -Eisenho…50.26 101-3005-61205 Utilities - Water -Velasco …39.70 101-3007-60151 GPSCVB 60,322.00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…8,900.88 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicati…60.17 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 46.81 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 25,630.98 101-6003-60118 Plan Checks 5,045.00 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract S…12,707.27 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 2,960.80 101-7003-60400 Office Supplies 396.78 101-7006-60104 Consultants 4,582.50 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 450.00 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 1,546.95 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 339.75 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landscape 10,556.00 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 122.57 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 92.45 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric 419.81 76 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01863 - DA 01/25/2019 1/24/2019 6:46:07 PM Page 5 of 5 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 215-7004-61117 Utilities - Electric - Media…24.68 215-7004-61211 Utilities - Water - Medians 2,605.44 217-0000-74010 Land Acquisition 2,770.00 248-9102-60159 Relocation Benefits 961.87 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 27,130.03 401-0000-60185 Design 67,160.86 401-0000-60188 Construction 688.77 501-0000-60148 Car Washes 888.00 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 688.94 502-0000-60104 Consultants 140.00 502-0000-61300 Utilities - Telephone 278.50 504-1010-60400 Office Supplies 39.14 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 748.37 Grand Total:253,326.75 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount **None**155,724.46 091002P 435.00 091004P 4,240.00 111205P 2,287.50 141517P 322.50 151603P 6,379.32 151612D 26,596.24 151612P 3,077.50 1819PMPP 705.00 1819TMICT 688.77 201601P 703.21 201602P 195.00 201603D 15,048.00 201603P 2,450.00 201608D 25,516.62 201704P 790.00 201705P 162.50 201709P 32.50 201801P 435.00 201802P 4,915.00 IRONE 177.63 TOASTE 2,445.00 Grand Total:253,326.75 77 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 1 of 7 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 AmountVendor Name Payable Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND 3,693.00Site Development Permit01/18/19 - SDP2017-0014 REFUND WDR…011819LQR GOLF LLC 101-0000-42435 153.70Travel & Training01/24/19 - CMTA TRAINING REIMB012419HALLICK, ROSEMARY 101-1006-60320 196.89Instructors01/25/19 - TAEKWONDO012519ROJAS, MIGUEL ANGEL 101-3002-60107 193.20Instructors01/25/19 - CARDIO STRENGTH012519COHEN, ANN MARIE 101-3002-60107 448.00Instructors01/25/19 - PERSONAL TRAINER012519KEPLER, KRISTOFFER NEAL 101-3002-60107 61.60Instructors01/25/19 - TAI CHI CHUAN012519MEDEIROS, JOYCELEEN 101-3002-60107 348.60Instructors01/25/19 - BALLROOM DANCING012519SHIRY, TERESA 101-3002-60107 49.00Instructors01/25/19 - PILATES012519BERETTO, LUCILLA 101-3002-60107 280.00Instructors01/25/19 - GENTLE YOGA012519VIELHARBER, KAREN 101-3002-60107 275.50Training & Education/MOU01/28/19 - TUITION REIMB012819ESCATEL-CARRELLO, ELIZABETH 101-1004-60322 218.00Training & Education/MOU01/28/19 - TUITION REIMB012819LERMA, MIRTA 101-1004-60322 54.29Travel & Training01/29/19 - HARASSMENT TRAINING SNAC…012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1004-60320 28.20Travel & Training01/29/19 - SAFE WORKPLACE SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1004-60320 18.32Travel & Training01/29/19 - CR QTRLY MTG SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1004-60320 14.62Employee Recognition Events01/29/19 - TREE TRIMMING SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1004-60340 4.88Office Supplies01/29/19 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP SUP…012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1005-60400 11.60Community Engagement01/29/19 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP SUP…012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1006-60137 10.27Office Supplies01/29/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-1006-60400 33.19LQ Police Volunteers01/29/19 - CRIME PREVENTION SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-2001-60109 30.27Volunteers - Fire01/29/19 - CERT HOLIDAY SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-2002-60110 11,475.00Boys & Girls ClubFY 18/19 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - CDBG REIM…012919BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACH…101-3001-60135 160.00Instructors01/29/19 - LA QUINTA VOICES012919MEEDS, WAYNE 101-3002-60107 2,677.50Instructors01/29/19 - BEG & INTERMED BRIDGE012919DAVID, MIRIAM 101-3002-60107 22.45Materials/Supplies01/29/19 - BATTERIES PANIC BUTTONS012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-3008-60431 8.48Office Supplies01/29/19 - LOCKBOX012919CASH/PETTY CASH 101-6004-60400 225.00Maintenance/Services01/15/19 - WC CARPET CLEANING1037ACE CARPET CLEANING 101-3008-60691 583.32Community Experiences01/18/19 - OPERATING SUPPLIES104CLQWINE-FAPALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3003-60149 500.00Miscellaneous Deposits01/23/19 - FAC RENTAL DEP REFUND109422MATHENY, JASON 101-0000-22830 95.96Operating Supplies01/22/19 - STAFF BUSINESS CARDS109CLQBC19PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-1001-60420 47.98Office Supplies01/22/19 - STAFF BUSINESS CARDS109CLQBC19PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-1006-60400 143.94Operating Supplies01/22/19 - STAFF BUSINESS CARDS109CLQBC19PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-2001-60420 175.00Advertising01/22/19 - RADIUS MAP & LABELS1DATAPRO MAPPING SOLUTIO…101-6002-60450 659.77Marketing & Tourism Promoti…FY 18/19 CLQ PENS PROMO118CLQMVP-FAPALMS TO PINES PRINTING 101-3007-60461 392.42Operating Supplies01/22/19 - D&D DEPT STAMPS19-97709RIVERSIDE RUBBER STAMP & …101-6006-60420 430.00Travel & Training02/25-03/01/19 - CODE TRAINING - GERA…200008536CACEO 101-6004-60320 27.73Operating Supplies01/07/19 - OPERATING SUPPLIES2018-3625MCDOWELL AWARDS 101-3002-60420 8,475.21School Officer09/13-10/10/18 - BP #4 SCHOOL RESOUR…2019/407DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHO…101-2001-60168 8,649.13School Officer10/11-11/07/18 - BP #5 SCHOOL RESOUR…2019/521DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHO…101-2001-60168 300.00Maintenance/Services01/11/19 - CITY HALL ROOF REPAIR21082WESTERN PACIFIC ROOFING C…101-3008-60691 462.00Advertising12/2018 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SDP2…2182460DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 101-6002-60450 462.00Advertising12/2018 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ZOA 2…2182460DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 101-6002-60450 1,500.00Veterinary Service01/19/20192388SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PR…101-6004-60194 215.00Maintenance/Services12/14/18 - PLANT REPLACEMENT SEASONS23916CONSERVE LANDCARE 101-3005-60691 800.00Tree Maintenance01/02/19 - TREE REPLACEMENT FB PARK24078CONSERVE LANDCARE 101-3005-60557 -26.53Sales Taxes Payable01/18/19 - WC GYM WIPES TAX2454722XL CORPORATION 101-0000-20304 438.45Operating Supplies01/18/19 - WC GYM WIPES2454722XL CORPORATION 101-3002-60420 158.00Maintenance/Services01/17/19 - WC PLUMBING SERVICE323194927ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS INC 101-3008-60691 214.11Maintenance/Services01/15/19 - FS #93 SUPPLIES3298-407322CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DI…101-2002-60691 207.09Office Supplies01/16/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES3402189870STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-3001-60400 89.13Office Supplies01/25/19 - OFFICE SUPPLIES3402967229STAPLES ADVANTAGE 101-1006-60400 3,500.00Advertising01251936310GREATER PALM SPRINGS CVB 101-3007-60450 707.68Maintenance/Services10/08/18 - FS#32 SERVICE43638AIR EXCHANGE 101-2002-60691 95.18Utilities - Cable01/24-02/23/19 - F S#93 CABLE SERVICE502415011419TIME WARNER CABLE 101-2002-61400 78 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 2 of 7 AmountVendor Name Payable Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 367.00Map/Plan CheckingFY18/19 ON-CALL MAP CHECKING SERVIC…5247RASA/ERIC NELSON 101-7002-60183 958.80Temporary Agency Services01/11/19 - HUB TEMP SERVICES52628839OFFICE TEAM 101-6006-60125 958.80Fire Service Costs01/18/19 - FIRE TEMP SERVICES52681467OFFICE TEAM 101-2002-60139 165.00Blood/Alcohol Testing12/31/18 - BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS71673AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES …101-2001-60174 190.00Security & Alarm01/04/19 - CITY HALL FIRE PANEL ZONE 1974094ALARM MONITORING SERVICE…101-3008-60123 285.00Security & Alarm01/07/19 - CITY HALL GLASSBREAK74096ALARM MONITORING SERVICE…101-3008-60123 77.37Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites12/2018 - SATELLITE PHONES8121268502NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 101-2002-61304 19.25LQ Police Volunteers01/15/19 - SHREDDING POLICE8126423712SHRED-IT USA - SAN BERNADI…101-2001-60109 1,375.00Maintenance/Services01/07/19 - CITY HALL ALARM & DETECTION85529925JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PR…101-3008-60691 5.99Postage01/05/19 - OVERNIGHT MAIL8878914ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 69.09Postage01/12/19 - OVERNIGHT MAIL8883880ONTRAC 101-1007-60470 327.57Administrative Citation Services10/2018 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING94402DATA TICKET, INC.101-6004-60111 182.10Administrative Citation Services12/2018 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING96301DATA TICKET, INC.101-6004-60111 44.52Utilities - Telephone12/11/18-01/10/19 - LQ TICKET WRITERS9821982321VERIZON WIRELESS 101-2001-61300 14.01Materials/Supplies01/17/19 - SPORTS COMPLEX KEYSBB00529668LOCK SHOP INC, THE 101-3008-60431 3,390.41Utilities - Electric - Sports Com…01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE139AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61106 1,450.61Utilities - Electricity01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE139AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3008-61101 440.42Utilities - Electricity01/28/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE140AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-2002-61101 428.97Utilities - Electric - Colonel Pai…01/28/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE140AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3005-61108 235.27Utilities - Electricity01/28/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE140AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 101-3008-61101 1,882.54Utilities - Water - Civic Center …01/25/19 - WATER SERVICECSW195COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61202 3,416.38Utilities - Water -Community P…01/25/19 - WATER SERVICECSW195COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61209 361.60Life Insurance Pay01/2019 - LIFE INSURANCE/DISABILITYJAN'196430680001STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20947 3,160.34Disability Insurance Pay01/2019 - LIFE INSURANCE/DISABILITYJAN'196430680001STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20955 379.85Add'l Life Insurance Pay01/2019 - ADD'L LIFE INSURANCEJAN'196430680002STANDARD INSURANCE COMP…101-0000-20948 2,084.00Sales Taxes Payable10/2018-12/2018 QUARTERLY SALES/USEOCT18-DEC18SILVERROCK RESORT 101-0000-20304 1,000.00Professional ServicesDOCUMENT SCANNING & QUALITY CONT…PJ6572-01VIATRON SYSTEMS INC 101-1005-60103 1,900.74Utilities - Water -Fritz Burns pa…01/25/19 - WATER SERVICEPWW169COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3005-61204 493.33Utilities - Water01/25/19 - WATER SERVICEPWW169COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…101-3008-61200 3.00Cash Over/Short01/16/19 - LIC-0107108 REFUND OVERPY…R43228CRM TECH 101-0000-42300 6.00Cash Over/Short01/16/19 - LIC-0102961 REFUND OVERPY…R43241ARNOLD PALMER DESIGN CO…101-0000-42300 39.60Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-764213 REFUND OVERPY…R43261PHILLIPS, JAMES 101-0000-42300 2.10Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-762961 REFUND OVERPY…R43268AVENU HOLDINGS, LLC 101-0000-42300 2.00Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-0100999 REFUND OVERPY…R43293DESERT COMMUNITY INSURA…101-0000-42300 3.00Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-0110861 REFUND OVERPY…R43307STUDIO E ARCHITECTS 101-0000-42300 20.37Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-764365 REFUND OVERPY…R43336CALCIANO, ANTHONY 101-0000-42300 45.00Cash Over/Short01/17/19 - LIC-0099798 REFUND OVERPY…R43337DESERT INSURANCE SOLUTIO…101-0000-42300 2.50Cash Over/Short01/18/19 - LIC-0099684 REFUND OVERPY…R43366SEBASTIAN, BARBARA 101-0000-42300 6.00Cash Over/Short01/18/19 - LIC-0003590 REFUND OVERPY…R43372BRIAN GIBSON POOL AND SPA 101-0000-42300 600.00Business Licenses01/22/19 - LIC-0003755 REFUND OVERPY…R43438LA QUINTA RESORT LEASING 101-0000-41600 10.87Credit Card Fee Revenue01/22/19 - LIC-0003755 REFUND OVERPY…R43438LA QUINTA RESORT LEASING 101-0000-43505 1,254.60Cash Over/Short01/23/19 - BRES2018-0404 REF CASHOVER…R43613SUNRISE LQ LLC 101-0000-42300 9.00Cash Over/Short01/23/19 - LIC-0111332 REFUND OVERPY…R43616VIATRON SYSTEMS INC 101-0000-42300 12.04Cash Over/Short01/23/19 - LIC-765584 REFUND OVERPY…R43633AUSTIN PROPERTIES 101-0000-42300 181.64Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites11/23-12/22/18 - EOC SATELLITE PHONERU08178148ROADPOST USA INC.101-2002-61304 180.51Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites12/23/18-01/22/19 - EOC SATELLITE PHO…RU08180993ROADPOST USA INC.101-2002-61304 186.89Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites01/23-02/22/19 - EOC SATELLITE PHONERU08181013ROADPOST USA INC.101-2002-61304 669,478.30Sheriff Patrol10/11-11/07/18 - SHERIFF PATROLSH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60161 29,910.20Police Overtime10/11-11/07/18 - POLICE OVERTIMESH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60162 132,216.40Target Team10/11-11/07/18 - TARGET TEAMSH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60163 55,033.28Community Services Officer10/11-11/07/18 - CSO IISH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60164 13,243.20Gang Task Force10/11-11/07/18 - DEP GANG TASK FORCESH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60166 13,243.20Narcotics Task Force10/11-11/07/18 - DEP NARCOTICS TASK F…SH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60167 94,165.75Motor Officer10/11-11/07/18 - MOTOR TEAMSH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60169 37,332.75Dedicated Sargeant10/11-11/07/18 - SERGEANTSH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60170 20,795.20Dedicated Lieutenant10/11-11/07/18 - LIEUTENANTSH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60171 30,868.24Sheriff - Mileage10/11-11/07/18 - SHERIFF MILEAGESH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60172 19,443.91Special Enforcement Funds10/11-11/07/18 - SPEC ENFORCEMENT F…SH0000034193RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D…101-2001-60175 2,623.75Professional ServicesTRAFFIC ANALYSIS - DUNE PALMS - JULY T…TN1198110ATERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 32,326.00Professional ServicesTRAFFIC ANALYSIS - DUNE PALMS - OCT 2…TN1198111ATERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 79 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 3 of 7 AmountVendor Name Payable Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 5,050.00Professional ServicesTRAFFIC ANALYSIS - DUNE PALMS - NOV 2…TN1198112ATERRA NOVA PLANNING & RE…101-6002-60103 Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Total:1,233,953.39 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND 189.66Traffic Control Signs01/10/19 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS1072302TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 80.75Traffic Control Signs01/14/19 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS1072352TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 52.07Safety Gear01/15/19 - SAFETY GEAR1072380TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60427 182.05Traffic Control Signs01/15/19 - TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS1072382TOPS'N BARRICADES INC 201-7003-60429 33.48Safety Gear01/15/19 - SAFETY GEAR215858ASUMMIT SAFETY LLC 201-7003-60427 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total:538.01 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 9.53Operating Supplies01/29/19 - CREATION STATION SUPPLIES012919CASH/PETTY CASH 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019GOLDBERG, TOD BARER 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019KUHN, SARAH 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019DIMON, HELENKAY 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019ADLER, CASEY J.202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019ADLER, KARI 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013019DOWNS, MARGARET ELIZABE…202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013119MAGRUDER, NILAH 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013119ORTEGA, EVANGELINE 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013119POCHODA, IVY 202-3004-60420 500.00Operating Supplies02/02/19 - LQ LIBRARY BOOKFEST013119TRUONG, CARRIE 202-3004-60420 1,058.00Operating Supplies01/23/19 - BOOKFEST EVENT INSURANCE1007686ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES …202-3004-60420 1,260.00Museum OperationsJAN 2019 -ARCHIVING SVCS FOR LQ HISTO…1-2019PARKOS-MARTINEZ, SHERRY A 202-3006-60105 151.71Maint-Other Equipment01/11/19 - MUSEUM3298-407293CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DI…202-3006-60665 3,155.80Maintenance/Services1/17/19 - LIBRARY SIGNS7396TOP OF THE LINE SIGNS 202-3004-60691 2,318.44Utilities - Electricity01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICECSE139AIMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 202-3004-61101 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total:12,953.48 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 510.96Materials/Supplies01/09/19 - LANDSCAPE MATERIAL107128SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO…215-7004-60431 2,590.00Operating Supplies12/14/18 - PALM TREES REPLACEMENT23960CONSERVE LANDCARE 215-7004-60420 109.18Utilities - Electric01/07-02/06/19 - PHONE SERVICEJAN'193453493FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…215-7004-61116 47.23Utilities - Electric01/10-02/09/19 - PHONE SERVICEJAN'195646974FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS…215-7004-61116 385.59Utilities - Electric01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICEPW191IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61116 355.81Utilities - Electric - Medians01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICEPW191IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 215-7004-61117 8,440.26Utilities - Water - Medians01/25/19 - WATER SERVICEPWW169COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 196.69Utilities - Water - Medians01/28/19 - WATER SERVICEPWW170COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI…215-7004-61211 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total:12,635.72 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 5,532.74AB 939 Recycling Solutions01/18/19 - BEN FRANKLIN RECYCLE BINS1206CLQRB-FAPALMS TO PINES PRINTING 221-0000-60127 Fund 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total:5,532.74 Fund: 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 4.00SB 1186 Revenue01/22/19 - LIC-0003755 REFUND OVERPY…R43438LA QUINTA RESORT LEASING 230-0000-42130 Fund 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 Total:4.00 Fund: 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 291.25Utilities - Electricity01/25/19 - ELECTRICITY SERVICEPW191IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 235-0000-61101 Fund 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND Total:291.25 Fund: 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014) 185.00Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919BRENNER, CRAIG 248-9102-60159 307.70Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919BAUMGARTNER, HELGA 248-9102-60159 94.98Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919HILDEBRAND, PATRICIA 248-9102-60159 2,060.00Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919GARZA, MARIA 248-9102-60159 2,060.00Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919MOLINA, MARIA 248-9102-60159 523.39Relocation Benefits01/29/19 - WSA RELOCATION BENEFITS012919SOTO, OLGA 248-9102-60159 Fund 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014) Total:5,231.07 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 1,241.50DesignNOV 2018 - DUNE PALMS WIDENING PRJ …3633BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 55,327.80DesignNOV 2018 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW W…3634BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 1,909.00DesignDEC 2018 DUNE PALMS WIDENING PRJ 09…3657BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 80 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 4 of 7 AmountVendor Name Payable Number Description (Item)Account Name Account Number 64,747.96DesignDEC 2018 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW W…3658BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 401-0000-60185 335.46ConstructionON-CALL SERVICES5620022382SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 401-0000-60188 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total:123,561.72 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 20.01Fuel & Oil01/29/19 - FUEL WORK TRUCK012919CASH/PETTY CASH 501-0000-60674 30.35Fuel & Oil01/29/19 - FUEL RIVCO FIRE DEPT MTG012919CASH/PETTY CASH 501-0000-60674 1,733.13Fuel & Oil01/01-01/15/19 - UNLEADED/DIESEL FUEL1306TOWER ENERGY GROUP 501-0000-60674 447.00Car Washes12/24/18 - VEHICLE WASHES239RAN AUTO DETAIL 501-0000-60148 68.93Street Sweeper12/2018 - SWEEPER FUELDEC'189603120297GAS COMPANY, THE 501-0000-60678 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total:2,299.42 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 8.83Technical01/20-02/19/19 - CABLE SERVICE61909011219TIME WARNER CABLE 502-0000-60108 226.12Cell/Mobile Phones12/02/18-01/01/19 - CITY CELL SVC IPADS9821374202VERIZON WIRELESS 502-0000-61301 36.78Operating Supplies12/20/18 - BUBBLE WRAPDEC'184593WALMART COMMUNITY 502-0000-60420 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total:271.73 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 41.63Repair & Maintenance01/29/19 - SRR BEARINGS COMPRESSOR012919CASH/PETTY CASH 601-0000-60660 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total:41.63 Grand Total:1,397,314.16 81 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 5 of 7 Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101 - GENERAL FUND 1,233,953.39 201 - GAS TAX FUND 538.01 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 12,953.48 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 12,635.72 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 5,532.74 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 4.00 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 291.25 248 - SA 2004 LO/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2014)5,231.07 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 123,561.72 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 2,299.42 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 271.73 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT 41.63 Grand Total:1,397,314.16 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20304 Sales Taxes Payable 2,057.47 101-0000-20947 Life Insurance Pay 361.60 101-0000-20948 Add'l Life Insurance Pay 379.85 101-0000-20955 Disability Insurance Pay 3,160.34 101-0000-22830 Miscellaneous Deposits 500.00 101-0000-41600 Business Licenses 600.00 101-0000-42300 Cash Over/Short 1,405.21 101-0000-42435 Site Development Permit 3,693.00 101-0000-43505 Credit Card Fee Revenue 10.87 101-1001-60420 Operating Supplies 95.96 101-1004-60320 Travel & Training 100.81 101-1004-60322 Training & Education/MOU 493.50 101-1004-60340 Employee Recognition Ev…14.62 101-1005-60103 Professional Services 1,000.00 101-1005-60400 Office Supplies 4.88 101-1006-60137 Community Engagement 11.60 101-1006-60320 Travel & Training 153.70 101-1006-60400 Office Supplies 147.38 101-1007-60470 Postage 75.08 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 52.44 101-2001-60161 Sheriff Patrol 669,478.30 101-2001-60162 Police Overtime 29,910.20 101-2001-60163 Target Team 132,216.40 101-2001-60164 Community Services Offic…55,033.28 101-2001-60166 Gang Task Force 13,243.20 101-2001-60167 Narcotics Task Force 13,243.20 101-2001-60168 School Officer 17,124.34 101-2001-60169 Motor Officer 94,165.75 101-2001-60170 Dedicated Sargeant 37,332.75 101-2001-60171 Dedicated Lieutenant 20,795.20 101-2001-60172 Sheriff - Mileage 30,868.24 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 165.00 101-2001-60175 Special Enforcement Funds 19,443.91 101-2001-60420 Operating Supplies 143.94 101-2001-61300 Utilities - Telephone 44.52 101-2002-60110 Volunteers - Fire 30.27 101-2002-60139 Fire Service Costs 958.80 101-2002-60691 Maintenance/Services 921.79 101-2002-61101 Utilities - Electricity 440.42 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Satell…626.41 101-2002-61400 Utilities - Cable 95.18 101-3001-60135 Boys & Girls Club 11,475.00 101-3001-60400 Office Supplies 207.09 82 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 6 of 7 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3002-60107 Instructors 4,414.79 101-3002-60420 Operating Supplies 466.18 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 583.32 101-3005-60557 Tree Maintenance 800.00 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 215.00 101-3005-61106 Utilities - Electric - Sports …3,390.41 101-3005-61108 Utilities - Electric - Colonel…428.97 101-3005-61202 Utilities - Water - Civic Ce…1,882.54 101-3005-61204 Utilities - Water -Fritz Bur…1,900.74 101-3005-61209 Utilities - Water -Commun…3,416.38 101-3007-60450 Advertising 3,500.00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pro…659.77 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 475.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 36.46 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 2,058.00 101-3008-61101 Utilities - Electricity 1,685.88 101-3008-61200 Utilities - Water 493.33 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 39,999.75 101-6002-60450 Advertising 1,099.00 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation Se…509.67 101-6004-60194 Veterinary Service 1,500.00 101-6004-60320 Travel & Training 430.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 8.48 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servic…958.80 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 392.42 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 367.00 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 85.55 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 452.46 202-3004-60420 Operating Supplies 6,067.53 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 3,155.80 202-3004-61101 Utilities - Electricity 2,318.44 202-3006-60105 Museum Operations 1,260.00 202-3006-60665 Maint-Other Equipment 151.71 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 2,590.00 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 510.96 215-7004-61116 Utilities - Electric 542.00 215-7004-61117 Utilities - Electric - Media…355.81 215-7004-61211 Utilities - Water - Medians 8,636.95 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutions 5,532.74 230-0000-42130 SB 1186 Revenue 4.00 235-0000-61101 Utilities - Electricity 291.25 248-9102-60159 Relocation Benefits 5,231.07 401-0000-60185 Design 123,226.26 401-0000-60188 Construction 335.46 501-0000-60148 Car Washes 447.00 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 1,783.49 501-0000-60678 Street Sweeper 68.93 502-0000-60108 Technical 8.83 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 36.78 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 226.12 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 41.63 Grand Total:1,397,314.16 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount **None**1,271,884.97 091004D 3,150.50 111205D 120,075.76 83 Demand Register Packet: APPKT01875 - BC 02/01/2019 2/1/2019 6:23:26 PM Page 7 of 7 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Expense Amount 1819TMICT 335.46 ARCHIVEE 1,260.00 MAKERE 9.53 TOASTE 583.32 TREEE 14.62 Grand Total:1,397,314.16 84 1/29/2019 6:45:10 PM Page 1 of 2 Payment Reversal Register City of La Quinta APPKT01867 - DA 01/28/2019 Canceled Payables Vendor Set:01 - Vendor Set 01 Bank:APBNK - APBNK 01743 Vendor Number FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total Vendor Amount -50.11 Vendor Name Check 121276 01/28/2019 -50.1101/25/2019 01/28/2019 Payment Type Payment Number Original Payment Date Reversal Date Cancel Date Payment Amount Payable Number:Description Payable AmountDue DatePayable Date 0001769-R 01/25/2019GARNISHMENT 50.1101/25/2019 85 Payment Reversal Register Packet: APPKT01867 - DA 01/28/2019 1/29/2019 6:45:10 PM Page 2 of 2 Bank Code Summary Canceled Payables Payables Left To Pay AgainBank Code Total APBNK -50.11 0.00 -50.11 -50.11 0.00Report Total:-50.11 86 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 01/19/19 – 02/01/19 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfer from 01/19/19 – 02/01/19 Wire Transfers: 01/25/2019 - WIRE TRANSFER - ICMA 3,861.13$ 01/25/2019 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 486.00$ 01/28/2019 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 40,908.45$ 01/29/2019 - WIRE TRANSFER - TASC 1,720.49$ 01/30/2019 - WIRE TRANSFER - PERS 77.47$ TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT 47,053.54$ ATTACHMENT 2 87 City of La Quinta Purchase Orders 07/01/18 – 12/31/18 Purchase Orders Listed below are the Purchase Orders from 07/01/18 – 12/31/18 P.O Number Amount Desert Concepts 1819-0068 49,520.00$ Frontier Parking Lot Wall Construction Desert Concepts 1819-0022 44,700.00$ Fitness Court Project Construction Terra Nova Planning 1819-0083 47,500.00$ Dune Palms Traffic & research Inc Analysis Hubstor Inc 1819-0074 42,364.06$ Laserfiche Worm Software Palms to Pines Printing 1819-0079 40,000.00$ Printing & Promotional Products Ark Connects LLC 1819-0055 40,000.00$ City IOS Application CASC Engineering 1819-0033 39,983.00$ Stormwater Map & & Consulting Analysis Turboscape Inc 1819-0066 34,980.00$ LQ Park Safety Surfacing Dave Bang Inc 1819-0028 31,487.00$ LQ Park Shade Structure American Fence Company 1819-0069 28,924.00$ SRR Bighorn Sheep Inc Fence Canon Financial Services 1819-0049 27,243.10$ Canon Copier Contract Econolite Control 1819-0022 25,821.21$ Vision Video Detection Products Inc Systems Old Town Artisian Studio 1819-0065 25,000.00$ Wellness West Program Partnership PurposeVendor ATTACHMENT 3 88 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: AUTHORIZE PURCHASES WITH PALMS TO PINES PRINTING FOR UP TO $80,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RECOMMENDATION Authorize purchases with Palms to Pines Printing for up to $80,000 for fiscal year 2018/19. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Per the purchasing policy, amounts paid to vendors/contractors over $50,000 must be approved by Council. •Staff requests authority to purchase up to $80,000 of printed merchandise for multiple city sponsored events; fiscal year-to-date expenditures with this vendor were $45,468. FISCAL IMPACT Up to $80,000 would be charged in increments, as needed, to the appropriate account(s) in 2018/19. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City adopted and implemented new brand guidelines which include logos, fonts, and colors. Staff has been updating City branded materials and have used Palms to Pines for many of these items. Palms to Pines has provided a wide variety of products used for multiple events at the best price and quality. In addition, savings were realized from having brand logos and guidelines on file with one vendor. The purchasing policy requires Council approval for purchases and/or contracts over $50,000. Fiscal year-to-date expenditures with this vendor are $45,468. Items purchased include: •Staff shirts and inspector vests (year-round) •Business cards (year-round) •Mailing envelopes with City logo (year-round) •Brew in LQ retail merchandise – socks, hats, shirts, mugs •Logo table clothes for special events •Pocket maps for special events •Name badges for employees, City Council and Commissioners CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 89 • High traffic indoor mats with City logo • Recycling containers. Staff anticipates placing additional orders this fiscal year for the following events: • Mission LQ event • City Picnic event • Additional recycling containers • Farmers Market marketing materials. In order to no exceed the $50,000 contracting limit and anticipating that Pines to Palms will continue to offer quality products and service at the lowest price, staff is requesting Council approval to increase the contract limit to $80,000. ALTERNATIVES Staff could request Council for all future purchases from Palms to Pines Printing on an as needed basis. However, this would be required for all purchases over $50,000 regardless of the value. Prepared by: Marcie Graham, Marketing Management Coordinator Christina Calderon, Community Resources Manager Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager 90 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION Approve the declaration and disposal of surplus equipment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The City has accumulated surplus, obsolete and non-functional equipment that has limited market value. •Pursuant to the City’s Surplus Supplies and Equipment Policy (Policy), Council must declare property surplus prior to sale. •Upon Council approval, a notice for bid will be advertised in The Desert Sun and the City’s website. FISCAL IMPACT Sale proceeds will be deposited into the original fund they were purchased from. Advertising cost will be approximately $400. Funds are budgeted in the 2018/19 Finance advertising budget (101-1004-60450). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City’s surplus consists of both functioning and non-functioning equipment that is no longer needed or has outlived its purpose (Attachment 1). Surplus items are identified by Department Directors, and the Finance Department consolidates the items for Council’s review. Upon the declaration of surplus, the items are advertised for bid in The Desert Sun and on the City’s website. Staff is proposing the following schedule: •Publication posting: February 22nd and March 1st, 2019 •Public viewing: February 25th, 28th and March 5th, 2019 •Bid deadline: March 8th, 2019 •Bid opening: March 11th, 2019 Per City Policy, if no bids are received, the surplus equipment will be donated to a non-profit organization or discarded. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 91 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative action; this process occurs so that the City may discard surplus property and equipment. Prepared by: Jessica Delgado, Management Assistant Approved by: Karla Campos, Finance Director Attachment: 1. List of Surplus Property and Equipment 92 Invent+A4:F7 7ory Number Item Type Make/Brand Model Number or Description Serial Number Notes/Condition of Item 978 Table Unknown 6ft long with wheels None Fair-missing One wheel 979 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 980 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 981 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 982 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 983 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 984 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 985 Table Unknown 4 ft and made of wood Color:brown None Fair 986 Chair Unknown Black seat cussion and wooded back None Good 987 Chair Unknown Black seat cussion and wooded back None Good 988 Chairs Unknown 45-Stackable blue chairs None Good 989 Chairs Unknown 4-Stackable orange chairs None Good 990 Table Unknown Small 2ft high crafts table None Good 991 Desk Unknown Large 4 drawer wooden desk None Good-one drawer is loose 992 Tables Unknown 4-rectangle tables with folding legs, 2-green and 2- brown None Fair 993 Office Chair Unknown Black leather None Good 994 Office Chair Unknown Black leather with no arms None Good 995 Office Chair Unknown Black with mesh back None Good 996 Office Chair Unknown Black with mesh back None Good 997 Office Chair Unknown Black cushion None Good 998 File Cabinet Unknown Black metal- 42" width None Good 93 Invent+A4:F7 7ory Number Item Type Make/Brand Model Number or Description Serial Number Notes/Condition of Item 999 Office Chair Unknown Cushioned and color of item is purple None Good 1000 Stool Unknown Small wooden brown stool None Fair 1001 Wall Décor Unknown 9 pictures with frames, different sizes None Fair 1002 White board Unknown Dry-erase, 24x36 None Good 1003 Time Stamp Unknown Used Unkown Poor-unknown if working 1004 CB Radios and Wires Unknown Several-two boxes Serveral Poor 1005 Vehicle Computer Stands Unknown Several- one box None Poor 1006 Office Chair Unknown Black leather None Good 1007 Storage shelves Unknown Black wire storage shelves None Unknown if missing pieces 1008 File Cabinet Unknown 4-drawer vertical cream color cabinet Good 1009 Office Chair Unknown Black leather with no arms None Good 1010 Podium Unknown Wooded with microphone holder and light None Fair-unknown if light is working 1011 Christmas Tree Unknown 9ft in torn box None Fair 1012 Cabinet Unknown Small wooden with two sliding doors None Fair 1013 Book Case Unknown Small wooden 2 shelf case None Fair 1014 Sewing Table Unknown Made of wood None Fair 1015 Projector Media 3m Digital system 815 T7E2265 3532 Fair-working 1016 Server Ibm 720 Power 720 103908P Poor-hardware issue/no drives 1017 Monitor Lg 15in L1718S 608UXXQ20114 Fair-working 1018 Monitor Lg 15in L1718S 608UXAY15648 Fair-working 1019 Tv Monitor Vizio 50in E500I-B1 LTMWPLEQ4565239 Poor-backlight issue94 Invent+A4:F7 7ory Number Item Type Make/Brand Model Number or Description Serial Number Notes/Condition of Item 1020 Tv Monitor Vizio 50in E500I-B1 LTMWPLEQ4565981 Poor-backlight issue 1021 Dvr Recorder Everfocus EDVR9D1 1C6057490137 Poor-not working 1022 Network Switch Dlink DSS-5+B205335006034 Fair-working 1023 Network Router Linksys DEFSR41 VER.3 C2130CAH009 Fair-working 1024 Printer Hp Laserjet 4000 TN ULC3192 Poor-need feeder assy 1025 Bench Unknown 9ft wooden bench None Fair 1026 Hard Drives and Servers Unknown Unknown Unkown New unopened small box 1027 Hard Drives and Servers Unknown Unknown Unkown New unopened small box 1028 Projector Cart Not applicable Metal with wheels None Fair 1029 Table Not applicable Wood/metal 2' x 4' table None Good 1030 Drone DJI Phantom 3 part 5, 4k camera, portable case included model: W322A P76DCG2 4A10785 Damaged and propellar's are not working 1031 Monitor Acer S273HL 11206833940 Poor-flickering screen 1032 Monitor Hp 15in L1706 CNK72805R5 Fair-working 1033 Monitor Hp 17in EM869A CNC62011J6 Fair-working 1034 Printer Hp Office Jet 6500a Plus 6500A CN1BB341K7 Unknown 1035 Ipad Case/Keyboard Clamcase C611001WS-Ipad Air 2 61010657 Fair-working 1036 Ipad Case/Keyboard Clamcase C611001WS-Ipad Air 2 61010658 Fair-working 1037 Ipad Case/Keyboard Clamcase C611001WS-Ipad Air 2 61010654 Fair-working 1038 Ipad Case/Keyboard Clamcase C611001WS-Ipad Air 2 61010659 Poor- keyboard not charging 1039 Ipad Cases Unknown Variety pack of 10 N/A Fair-working 1040 Ipad Cases Ipad Air, Lifeproof Pack Of 6 N/A Fair-working95 Invent+A4:F7 7ory Number Item Type Make/Brand Model Number or Description Serial Number Notes/Condition of Item 1041 Ipad Case Unknown Variety pack Of 11 N/A Fair-working 1042 Docking Station Landing Zone, Macbook LZ2013AM-White P2326B02873 Fair-working 1043 Docking Station Landing Zone, Macbook LZ2013AM-White P3325A01520 Fair-working 1044 Docking Station Landing Zone, Macbook LZ2013AM-White P332274A04A Fair-working 1045 Docking Station Landing Zone, Macbook LZ2013AM-White P332194A0SI Fair-working 1046 Iphone 6 cases Otterbox Defender Black-pack Of 11 N/A Fair-working 1047 Iphone 6 cases Otterbox Defender Black-pack Of 11 N/A Fair-working 1048 Iphone 8 Cases Otterbox Defender Black-pack Of 2 N/A Good-working 1049 Wifi Controller Ruckus Zonedirector 1100 ZD1100 RUCKUS-wireless 281323000867 Good-working 1050 Wireless Access Point Ruckus, Zoneflex 7762 ZONEFLEX 7372-Variety pack of 18 APS Unkown Fair-working 96 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: AWARD CONTRACT TO HARDY & HARPER, INC. FOR THE AVENIDA BERMUDAS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATED ON AVENIDA BERMUDAS AT CALLE NOGALES AND CALLE MADRID, (PROJECT NO. 2018-02, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECT NO. 4.LQ.32-18) RECOMMENDATION Award a contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $45,056 for the Avenida Bermudas American with Disabilities Act Improvements Project located on Avenida Bermudas at Calle Nogales and Calle Madrid. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The Avenida Bermudas American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements Project (Attachment 1) entails removing sidewalk, curb, gutter, and pavement to construct modified curb ramps. •Hardy & Harper, Inc. of Santa Ana, California submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid of $45,056 (Attachment 2). FISCAL IMPACT The following represents the project budget: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Project Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 0 $ 17,000 $ 17,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 0 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Construction: $ 45,056 $ 0 $ 45,056 City Administration: $ 0 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Contingency: $ 0 $ 16,170 $ 16,170 Total Budget: $ 45,056 $ 43,170 $ 88,226 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 10 97 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Project would bring the curb ramps along Avenida Bermudas into ADA compliance. Sidewalk, curb, gutter, and pavement will be updated at Avenida Bermudas at Calle Nogales and Calle Madrid. On January 9, 2019, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received five bids on January 31, 2019. Hardy & Harper, Inc. submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid of $45,056. The following is the project schedule: Council considers project award February 19, 2019 Execute contract and mobilize February 20 to March 6, 2019 Construction (20 working days) March 2019 to April 2019 Accept improvements May 2019 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., City Engineer Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison Summary 98 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS Feet Legend Avenida Bermudas ADA Ramp Improvements Notes 0 REPORT PRINTED ON...12/6/2018 9:36:04 AM Project Map 6,019 12,037 Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map ATTACHMENT 1 99 100 BID OPENING: 01-31-20192018-02, CDBG No. 4.LQ.32-18Avenida Bermudas ADA ImprovementsBid Comparison SummaryItem No.Description QTY Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price1Mobilization1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 4,100.00$ 4,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$2,000.00$ 2,000.00$2Traffic Control1 LS $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 3Remove Concrete Sidewalk585 SF $ 4.00 2,340.00$ 5.50$ 3,217.50$ 5.00$2,925.00$ 5.00$2,925.00$ 3.50$ 2,047.50$5.00$ 2,925.00$4Sawcut and Remove Roadway Section 300 SF $ 10.00 3,000.00$ 9.50$ 2,850.00$ 3.25$975.00$ 5.00$1,500.00$ 10.00$ 3,000.00$15.00$ 4,500.00$5Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter43 LF $ 40.00 1,720.00$ 32.00$ 1,376.00$ 35.00$ 1,505.00$ 100.00$ 4,300.00$ 20.00$ 860.00$40.00$ 1,720.00$6Modify and Restore Hardscape as needed1LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,800.00$ 1,800.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$9,000.00$ 9,000.00$7Construct 3” AC over 4” Crushed AB300 SF $ 30.00 9,000.00$ 22.00$ 6,600.00$ 14.00$ 4,200.00$ 15.00$ 4,500.00$ 10.00$ 3,000.00$16.00$ 4,800.00$8Construct Sidewalk205 SF $ 10.00 2,050.00$ 8.50$ 1,742.50$ 13.00$ 2,665.00$ 6.00$1,230.00$ 10.00$ 2,050.00$13.00$ 2,665.00$9Construct Case B (Mod) Curb Ramp2EA $ 2,500.00 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 6,200.00$ 12,400.00$ 5,800.00$ 11,600.00$ 3,750.00$ 7,500.00$4,500.00$ 9,000.00$10Type II Slurry Seal 1,100 SF $ 4.00 4,400.00$ 5.70$ 6,270.00$ 7.00$7,700.00$ 2.00$2,200.00$ 4.50$ 4,950.00$10.00$ 11,000.00$ 11Striping1LS $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,450.00$ 6,450.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 5,577.00$ 5,577.00$7,390.00$ 7,390.00$49,510.00$ 45,056.00$ 50,520.00$ 49,755.00$ 39,484.50$ 77,000.00$ Item No.DescriptionQTY Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price1Mobilization1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$1,000.00$ 1,000.00$2Traffic Control1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$6,500.00$ 6,500.00$3Remove Concrete Cross Gutter165 SF $ 20.00 3,300.00$ 11.00$ 1,815.00$ 7.00$1,155.00$ 15.00$ 2,475.00$ 10.00$ 1,650.00$15.00$ 2,475.00$4Remove Curb9LF $ 40.00 360.00$ 22.00$ 198.00$ 60.00$ 540.00$ 100.00$ 900.00$ 10.00$ 90.00$ 40.00$ 360.00$5Modify and Restore Hardscape as needed1LS $ 500.00 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 990.00$ 990.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$3,000.00$ 3,000.00$6Construct 8” Cross Gutter (Includes Curb)165 SF $ 25.00 4,125.00$ 17.00$ 2,805.00$ 22.00$ 3,630.00$ 15.00$ 2,475.00$ 65.00$ 10,725.00$ 30.00$ 4,950.00$7Construct Case B (Mod no wings) Curb Ramp1 EA $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,325.00$ 6,325.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$4,500.00$ 4,500.00$8Replace Existing Striping1 LS500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 950.00$ 950.00$1,215.00$ 1,215.00$ 12,285.00$ 16,318.00$ 18,140.00$ 26,150.00$ 31,415.00$ 24,000.00$ Item No.DescriptionQTYUnit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price1Mobilization1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$1,000.00$ 1,000.00$2Traffic Control1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$6,500.00$ 6,500.00$3Remove Concrete Cross Gutter195 SF $ 20.00 3,900.00$ 11.00$ 2,145.00$ 7.00$1,365.00$ 15.00$ 2,925.00$ 10.00$ 1,950.00$15.00$ 2,925.00$4Remove Curb13 LF $ 40.00 520.00$ 22.00$ 286.00$ 60.00$ 780.00$ 100.00$ 1,300.00$ 10.00$ 130.00$40.00$ 520.00$5Modify and Restore Hardscape as needed1LS $ 500.00 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 990.00$ 990.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$5,000.00$ 5,000.00$6Construct 8” Cross Gutter (Includes Curb)195 SF $ 25.00 4,875.00$ 17.00$ 3,315.00$ 22.00$ 4,290.00$ 15.00$ 2,925.00$ 65.00$ 12,675.00$ 30.00$ 5,850.00$7Construct Case B (Mod no wings) Curb Ramp1 EA $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,325.00$ 6,325.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$4,500.00$ 4,500.00$8Replace Existing Striping1 LS500.00$ 500.00$ 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 6,450.00$ 6,450.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,574.00$ 2,574.00$3,705.00$ 3,705.00$ 13,795.00$ 18,846.00$ 24,600.00$ 26,450.00$ 35,329.00$ 30,000.00$ Item No.DescriptionQTY Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price1Mobilization1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$1,000.00$ 1,000.00$2Traffic Control1 LS $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$6,500.00$ 6,500.00$3Remove Concrete Cross Gutter115 SF $ 20.00 2,300.00$ 11.00$ 1,265.00$ 7.00$805.00$ 15.00$ 1,725.00$ 10.00$ 1,150.00$15.00$ 1,725.00$4Remove Curb14 LF $ 40.00 560.00$ 22.00$ 308.00$ 60.00$ 840.00$ 100.00$ 1,400.00$ 10.00$ 140.00$40.00$ 560.00$5Modify and Restore Hardscape as needed1LS $ 500.00 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 990.00$ 990.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6Construct 8” Cross Gutter (Includes Curb)115 SF $ 25.00 2,875.00$ 17.00$ 1,955.00$ 22.00$ 2,530.00$ 15.00$ 1,725.00$ 65.00$ 7,475.00$30.00$ 3,450.00$7Construct Case B (Mod no wings) Curb Ramp1 EA $ 1,500.00 1,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,325.00$ 6,325.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$4,500.00$ 4,500.00$8Replace Existing Striping1 LS500.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 950.00$ 950.00$1,265.00$ 1,265.00$ 10,235.00$ 15,028.00$ 16,990.00$ 19,150.00$ 27,715.00$ 24,000.00$ Item No.DescriptionQTY Unit Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price Extended Price1Mobilization1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,750.00$ 2,750.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$2,500.00$ 2,500.00$2Traffic Control1 LS $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$11,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 3Remove Concrete Sidewalk920 SF $ 4.00 3,680.00$ 5.50$ 5,060.00$ 5.00$4,600.00$ 5.00$4,600.00$ 3.50$ 3,220.00$5.00$ 4,600.00$4Sawcut and Remove Roadway Section 230SF $ 10.00 2,300.00$ 9.50$ 2,185.00$ 3.25$747.50$ 5.00$1,150.00$ 10.00$ 2,300.00$15.00$ 3,450.00$5Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter55 LF $ 40.00 2,200.00$ 32.00$ 1,760.00$ 33.00$ 1,815.00$ 100.00$ 5,500.00$ 20.00$ 1,100.00$40.00$ 2,200.00$6Modify and Restore Hardscape as needed (Include place new DG)1 LS $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 2,250.00$ 2,250.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$7,000.00$ 7,000.00$7Construct 3” AC over 4” Crushed AB230 SF $ 30.00 6,900.00$ 22.00$ 5,060.00$ 14.00$ 3,220.00$ 15.00$ 3,450.00$ 10.00$ 2,300.00$16.00$ 3,680.00$8Construct 6” Curb and Gutter25 LF $ 90.00 2,250.00$ 55.00$ 1,375.00$ 50.00$ 1,250.00$ 100.00$ 2,500.00$ 45.00$ 1,125.00$60.00$ 1,500.00$9Construct Sidewalk370 SF $ 10.00 3,700.00$ 8.50$ 3,145.00$ 13.00$ 4,810.00$ 6.00$2,220.00$ 10.00$ 3,700.00$13.00$ 4,810.00$10Construct Case B Curb Ramp1EA $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,325.00$ 6,325.00$ 5,800.00$ 5,800.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 11Construct Case A (Mod) Curb Ramp1EA $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,720.00$ 5,720.00$ 5,200.00$ 5,200.00$ 3,750.00$ 3,750.00$4,500.00$ 4,500.00$12Striping1LS $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ 4,600.00$ 4,600.00$ 5,235.00$ 5,235.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,500.00$ 4,552.00$ 4,552.00$5,760.00$ 5,760.00$39,530.00$ 39,685.00$ 44,522.50$ 41,420.00$ 40,047.00$ 55,000.00$ 125,355.00$ 134,933.00$ 154,772.50$ 162,925.00$ 173,990.50$ 210,000.00$ Desert ConceptsONYXSUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1-8:SUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1-8:SUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1-8:SUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1-8:GRAND TOTAL:Three PeaksEBS GeneralHardy and HarperSUBTOTAL BID ITEMS 1-21:Engineers Estimate2/4/2019Page 1 of 1ATTACHMENT 2ATTACHMENT 1101 102 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE JEFFERSON STREET SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN AVENUE 50 AND DEREK ALAN DRIVE (PROJECT NO. 2017-06) RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer’s estimate, and authorize Staff to bid the Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •On October 17, 2018 Council approved the Riverside County Transportation Commission Agreement for funding under SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. This grant will fund 50% of the improvement cost. •This project is located on the west side of Jefferson Street between Avenue 50 and Derek Alan Drive (Attachment 1). •The project includes 900 feet of new sidewalk, a new American with Disabilities Act accessible ramp, and the reconstruction of one (1) curb ramp. FISCAL IMPACT The 2017/18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates $180,000; $90,000 of SB821 Grant Funds and $90,000 of General Funds. The following is the project budget: Total Budget Professional: $ 9,000 Design: $ 12,400 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 12,100 Construction: $ 132,000 Contingency: $ 14,500 Total Budget: $ 180,000 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 11 103 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project was selected because it is the final link to complete the pedestrian accessibility along the entire Jefferson Street Corridor. In particular, there is a development immediately north of the project that has many elderly and disabled residents that need this sidewalk to access facilities in the Citrus Plaza Shopping Center. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on February 19, 2019, the following is the project schedule: Council bid authorization February 19, 2019 Bid period February 20, 2019 to March 21, 2019 Council considers project award April 2, 2019 Execute contract and mobilize April 3 to April 29, 2019 Construction (15 working days) April to May 2019 Accept improvements June 2019 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative due to the funding timing constraints. Prepared by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., City Engineer Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 104 *IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. © Riverside County GIS Legend Notes From Avenue 50 to Derek Alan Drive REPORT PRINTED ON...2/7/2019 11:38:16 AM Vicinity Map Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure 0 12,0376, 019 Feet Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map ATTACHMENT 1 105 106 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY NOMINATIONS RECOMMENDATION Approve the Pillars of the Community nominations as recommended by the Community Services Commission. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Staff opened the nomination window for Pillars of the Community on Monday, October 29, 2018 and promoted the program through the City’s website, social media channels, Gem newspaper, and flyers. •The City received two nominations and at the February 11, 2019 meeting, the Community Services Commission (Commission) unanimously recommended approval of the two nominees. •The Pillars of the Community event is scheduled for March 27, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost for the plaque is $200 and funds are available in the Community Resources Special Events Budget (101-3003-60149). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2014, Council directed staff to rework the Pillars of the Community nomination criteria to include more biographical information, omit the 25 signatures requirement, and present nominations to the Commission for review and recommendation. Nominee criteria also includes: 1) City residency for a minimum of three years, 2) significant contribution to development of the City, 3) recognition for contribution efforts. Nomination information is outlined on the Pillar Nominee Summary (Attachment 1). Community members submitted two nominations for consideration; Mark Johnson (Attachment 2) and Sally Shelton (Attachment 3); BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 107 Juan Salas, the City’s 201 9 Senior Inspiration Award recipient will also be honored at the Pillar of the Community program. ALTERNATIVES Council may not approve the recommendation and direct staff to seek additional nominees. Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Management Assistant Approved by: Chris Escobedo, Director of Community Resources Attachments: 1.Pillar Nominee Summary 108 Pillars of the Community Nominee Summary Nominee: Mark Johnson La Quinta Resident: 2005-Present Service Organizations: Financial Advisory Committee: 2017-Present Community Services Commission: 2014-2017 Ad Hoc Financial Advisory Committee (Measure G): 2015-2016 Significant Contributions: Mark has made a significant impact on the Commissions he served. Mark was a key contributor to the Financial Advisory Committee, developing a 10-year expenditure model which helped lead to the passage of Measure G and his valuable insight was instrumental to the success of the new Financial Advisory Commission. He has been recognized by the City for his outstanding work as a Commissioner as well as other organizations for his dedication to improving the community. Mark has been described by his peers as a “true champion of integrity” and a “tireless volunteer.” He currently maintains a blog on Coachella Valley water issues, helping to educate the community on water concerns. Nominee: Sally Shelton La Quinta Resident: 2006-Present Service Organizations: Nextdoor Neighborhood Watch Coffee with A Cop Significant Contributions: Sally uses the online platform Nextdoor to inform and educate members of the community about local events, traffic issues, criminal activity, and even lost pets. Using Nextdoor, she has formed Neighborhood Watch groups and maintains positive relationships with the City, La Quinta Police Department, La Quinta Museum, LQ Historical Society, and the Cove Neighborhood Association. Sally welcomes new La Quinta residents to the community by connecting them with organizations and encouraging them to participate in local events. Lieutenant Michael Tapp of La Quinta Police Department describes Sally as “an exemplary citizen who inspires those around her.” ATTACHMENT 1 109 110 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ECONOLITE SYSTEMS, INC TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL THE CENTRACS ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO MANAGE THE CITY’S SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS RECOMMENDATION Approve Contract Services Agreement with Econolite Systems, Inc., not to exceed $142,300, to purchase and install Centracs Advanced Traffic Management System to manage the City’s signalized intersections; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The City is investing $3.25 million in City and Federal grant funds to install fiber optic traffic signal controller communications links and new traffic signal controllers. •The traffic signal control system is managed via software; the current Traffic Management Software (Aries) was developed in 1992 and reached its end of life 10 years ago. •Econolite developed the Centracs Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), which is the most advanced traffic signal management system and software; Staff is recommending that the City not bid this purchase and instead procure the equipment and software on a sole source basis. FISCAL IMPACT Funding is available in the Information Technology services account (502- 0000-71042) for the cost of $142,300 (exclusive of sales tax and shipping fees). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City’s current traffic signal control system employs Aries software, which was developed in 1992. This system allows traffic signal controllers to communicate, with master controllers managing local controllers within a BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 111 street corridor. The master controllers continually monitor the local controllers to ensure that they are synchronized. This system also allows Staff to adjust signal timing from remote locations using dial-up modem technology. Staff monitors signal synchronization on a 24/7 basis and adjusts signal timing when conditions warrant. Since 1992, signal control systems have advanced and today’s systems employ fiber optic communications and faster/smarter controller technology. The City is investing $156,100 in fiber optic signal interconnects and new traffic signal controllers in conjunction with the City’s $3.1 million investment in signal coordination in the Highway 111 Corridor pursuant to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grants the City received in 2016. The City is working with the Coachella Association of Governments (CVAG) to ensure that the City’s system is coordinated with CVAG’s valley-wide traffic signal coordination initiative. Staff and the City’s traffic engineer have reviewed and evaluated all of the signal controller systems on the market today and determined that the Econolite ATMS system is more compatible with existing City equipment, can seamlessly integrate with current software, and would be compatible with CVAG’s valley-wide management system. Staff is recommending that the City not bid this system and instead do a select source purchase from Econolite. Per the proposed agreement (Attachment 1) Econolite would provide two servers (data base and communications), the Centracs signal management software, and the installation, integration and on-going maintenance of the city-wide ATMS system. CVAG would fund system maintenance. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to deny, delay or modify this agreement, or direct staff to bid this system. Prepared by: Kris Gunterson, Traffic Management Analyst Approved by: Danny Castro, Design & Development Director Attachment: 1.Agreement for Contract Services with Econolite Systems, Inc. 112 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, (“City”), a California municipal corporation, and Econolite Systems, Inc., a California Corporation (“Contracting Party”). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1.SERVICES OF CONTRACTING PARTY. 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide those services related to Signalized Intersection Management System – Centracs Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS), as specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Services”). Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party is a provider of first-class work and/or services and Contracting Party is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contracting Party covenants that it shall follow industry standards in performing the Services required hereunder, and that all materials, if any, will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “industry standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar services under similar circumstances. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All Services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and laws of the City and any Federal, State, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Wage and Hour Compliance, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local wage and hour laws. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Contracting Party shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, including a City of La Quinta business license. Contracting Party and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the 113 ATTACHMENT 1 -2- Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by City), and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, free and harmless against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder. Contracting Party shall be responsible for all subcontractors’ compliance with this Section. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contracting Party warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site where the Services are to be performed, if any, and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. Should Contracting Party discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by City, Contracting Party shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contracting Party’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.6 Standard of Care. Contracting Party acknowledges and understands that the Services contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Contracting Party’s work will be held to an industry standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.5 hereinabove, Contracting Party represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the industry standard of quality as set forth in this Agreement. Contracting Party shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the Services performed by Contracting Party, and the equipment, materials, papers, and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence. The performance of Services by Contracting Party shall not relieve Contracting Party from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contracting Party. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services (“Additional 114 -3- Services”) only when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, provided that Contracting Party shall not be required to perform any Additional Services without compensation. Contracting Party shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization (in the form of a written change order if Contracting Party is a contractor performing the Services) from the Contract Officer, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer’s written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in “Exhibit D” (the “Special Requirements”), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2. COMPENSATION. 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred and Forty-Two Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($142,300) (the “Contract Sum”), exclusive of any sales tax and shipping fees, except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party’s rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may 115 -4- be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Contracting Party’s overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 2.2 Method of Billing & Payment. Any month in which Contracting Party wishes to receive payment, Contracting Party shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City’s Finance Director, an invoice for Services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in installment payments made in accordance with amounts identified in Contracting Party’s Schedule of Compensation (“Exhibit B”) based on work performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party. Presentation of an invoice shall constituent a certification by a principal member of the Contracting Party that the payment requested is for Services performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer and subject to retention pursuant to Section 8.3, City will pay Contracting Party for all items stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City’s Finance Department. 2.3 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional Services approved in advance by the Contract Officer pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing by both City and Contracting Party in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Contracting Party. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) or less of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater amount of compensation for Additional Services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council, the City Manager, or Department Director, depending upon City laws, regulations, rules and procedures concerning public contracting. Under no circumstances shall Contracting Party receive compensation for any Additional Services unless prior written approval for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 116 -5- 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE. 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. If the Services not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as set forth in Section 3.2 and “Exhibit C”, it is understood that the City will suffer damage. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in “Exhibit C” (the “Schedule of Performance”). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contracting Party, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Contracting Party shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the forced delay when and if in the Contract Officer’s judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to time period in the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Contracting Party to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on February 20, 2019 and terminate on September 30, 2019 (“Initial Term”). 4. COORDINATION OF WORK. 4.1 Representative of Contracting Party. The following principals of Contracting Party (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contracting Party authorized 117 -6- to act in its behalf with respect to the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: (a) Nick Ullman, Vice President E-mail: nullman@econolite.com It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contracting Party and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be changed by Contracting Party and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The “Contract Officer” shall be Danny Castro, Design and Development Director or such other person as may be designated in writing by the City Manager of City. It shall be Contracting Party’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Contracting Party shall refer any decisions, that must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Contracting Party, its principals, and its employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Contracting Party shall not contract or subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contracting Party, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. Any attempted or purported assignment or contracting or subcontracting by Contracting Party without City’s 118 -7- express written approval shall be null, void, and of no effect. No approved transfer shall release Contracting Party of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Contracting Party, its agents, or its employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision, or control of Contracting Party’s employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number or hours of service. Contracting Party shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contracting Party in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contracting Party. Contracting Party shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Except for the Contract Sum paid to Contracting Party as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contracting Party for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contracting Party for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contracting Party and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contracting Party agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation laws regarding Contracting Party and Contracting Party’s employees. Contracting Party further 119 -8- agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Contracting Party to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any payment due to Contracting Party under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contracting Party as a result of Contracting Party’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work. Contracting Party represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all of the Services set forth herein. Contracting Party represents that the Services required herein will be performed by Contracting Party or under its direct supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted under applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services. 4.6 City Cooperation. City shall provide Contracting Party with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records, or other data or information pertinent to the Services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contracting Party only from or through action by City. 5. INSURANCE. 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of any Services under this Agreement and throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, policies of insurance as set forth in “Exhibit E” (the “Insurance Requirements”) which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 5.2 Proof of Insurance. Contracting Party shall provide Certificate of Insurance to Agency along with all required endorsements. Certificate of Insurance and endorsements must be approved by Agency’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel approved by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as set forth in “Exhibit F” 120 -9- (“Indemnification”) which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 7. RECORDS AND REPORTS. 7.1 Reports. Contracting Party shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning Contracting Party’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Contracting Party hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contracting Party agrees that if Contracting Party becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contracting Party shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 7.2 Records. Contracting Party shall keep, and require any subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the “Books and Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contracting Party’s business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contracting Party’s successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and 121 -10- audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement. 7.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium prepared or caused to be prepared by Contracting Party, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement (the “Documents and Materials”) shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contracting Party shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contracting Party will be at City’s sole risk and without liability to Contracting Party, and Contracting Party’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. Contracting Party may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contracting Party shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contracting Party fails to secure such assignment, Contracting Party shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. 7.4 In the event City or any person, firm, or corporation authorized by City reuses said Documents and Materials without written verification or adaptation by Contracting Party for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said Documents and Materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Contracting Party from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 7.5 Licensing of Intellectual Property. By this Agreement, Econolite will provide to City Econolite’s grant for exclusive use in the 122 -11- City, a nonexclusive, non-transferable product software license for the Centracs software product(s), including but not limited to the product, Centracs LE, in accordance with the licensing limits set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A. City shall be entitled to: a) Use the licensed programs but only in machine-readable form on licensed computers; b) Use the support material supplied but only as required to support the use of the licensed programs; and c) Make only as many backup copies of the licensed programs in machine readable form as required to support the use of the licensed programs on each computer. All backup copies must include the copyright notice in the original form as it appears on the licensed programs. City may not copy, modify, adapt, merge, disassemble, decompile or distribute the software, its documentation or create derivative works based upon the software. None of the support material in human readable form included with the licensed programs may be copied in any way. City may print any screen the software will allow, however, no copyright notices may be removed from the printing. The licensed programs and support material included with this Agreement are confidential information that is the property of Econolite. The licensed programs, program concepts or any of the support materials shall not be made available to any other party, agency or organization without the written consent of Econolite. Title to all intellectual property rights including patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret rights and title to all ownership rights and all copies of and all media bearing the licensed programs, support materials and program concept shall remain in Econolite. Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contracting Party or provided to Contracting Party by City. Subject to the limitations herein, City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk. 7.6 Release of Documents. The Documents and Materials shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer or as required by law. Contracting Party shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.7 Confidential or Personal Identifying Information. Contracting Party covenants that all City data, data lists, trade secrets, 123 -12- documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussion notes, or other information, if any, developed or received by Contracting Party or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contracting Party to any person or entity without prior written authorization by City or unless required by law. City shall grant authorization for disclosure if required by any lawful administrative or legal proceeding, court order, or similar directive with the force of law. All City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussions, or other information shall be returned to City upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Contracting Party’s covenant under this section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 7.8 DATA RIGHTS FOR DATA GENERATED BY THE SYSTEM. City shall retain ownership and associated rights of all traffic data generated by the system provided under this agreement (the “data”). City shall not sell or transfer the data to any private entities for purposes not directly related to City activities without the prior written consent of Econolite. This provision is not intended to preclude the City from providing data generated by the System to agencies within the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (“CVAG”) for purposes of coordinating the City’s traffic signal operations with members of the CVAG. In furtherance of Econolite’s commitment to the advancement of future system-based technologies and the betterment of the nation’s traffic management planning, City shall provide the data to Econolite at Econolite’s request. Econolite shall notify and obtain City’s consent City prior to transfer of any data to private entities. 8. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contracting Party covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of 124 -13- its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety, or general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party’s right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City’s right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to this Article 8.0. During the period of time that Contracting Party is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during any period of default. 8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contracting Party sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contracting Party in the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City’s consent or approval of any act by Contracting Party requiring City’s consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contracting Party. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 125 -14- 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration Of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Contracting Party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contracting Party shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Contracting Party shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except amounts held as a retention pursuant to this Agreement. 8.8 Termination for Default of Contracting Party. If termination is due to the failure of Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall vacate any City-owned property which Contracting Party is permitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Contracting Party shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Contracting Party for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City. 8.9 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees; provided, however, that the attorneys’ fees awarded pursuant to this Section shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing party in the conduct of the litigation. Attorneys’ fees shall 126 -15- include attorneys’ fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 9. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 9.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contracting Party, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contracting Party or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9.2 Conflict of Interest. Contracting Party covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of it, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contracting Party’s performance of the Services under this Agreement. Contracting Party further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Contracting Party agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contracting Party warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Contracting Party covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, 127 -16- national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. To City: CITY OF LA QUINTA Attention: Kris Gunterson, Traffic Management Analyst 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 To Contracting Party: ECONOLITE SYSTEMS, Inc. Attention: Nick Ullman Vice President, Project Delivery 1250 N. Tustin Avenue Anaheim, CA 92807 10.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 10.3 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement. 10.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument 10.5 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement including the exhibits hereto is the entire, complete, and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous 128 -17- negotiations, arrangements, agreements, and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. 10.6 Amendment. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contracting Party and by the City Council of City. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 10.7 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 10.8 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contracting Party offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contracting Party without further acknowledgment of the parties. 10.9 No Third Party Beneficiaries. With the exception of the specific provisions set forth in this Agreement, there are no intended third-party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder. 10.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This 129 -18- Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. City of La Quinta, California Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California Municipal Corporation FRANK J. SPEVACEK, City Manager CONTRACTING PARTY: Econolite Systems, Inc. By: Name: Nick Ullman Title: Vice President, Project Delivery Dated: _______________________ 130 Exhibit A Scope of Services 2. Project Tasks The following project tasks are based on Econolite’s broad experience with ATMS projects; some tasks may vary based on the specific needs of the City. 2.1 Project Schedule Typical project delivery is as follows: Notice to Proceed Week 0 Kickoff Meeting Week 1 System Staging and Procurement Weeks 2 – 12 Graphics Development Weeks 11 – 12 Factory Setup & Testing Weeks 13 – 16 System Shipment to Project Site Week 17 Centracs ATMS System Integration Weeks 18 – 19 System Training Week 20 System Testing Week 21 Project Closure Week 22 2.2 Procurement For this project, Econolite will be responsible for providing an application/database server (Table 2) and communications server (Table 3). All workstations, networking equipment, an equipment rack, and associated peripherals will be provided by the City. Table 2 – Econolite-supplied Database Server Item Description Quantity Server: Dell PowerEdge R740 1 Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5118 2.3G, 12C/24T, 10.4GT/s, 16.5M Cache 2 Memory: 64GB Memory 1 Hard Drive: 480GB SSD SATA 2.5in Hot-plug Drive 6 Hard Drive Controller: PERC H730P Raid Controller for RAID 5 1 Operating System: Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Standard, 10 CAL 1 Database Software: Microsoft SQL Server 2016 Standard, 10 CAL 1 CD-ROM or DVD-ROM Drive: DVD+/-RW, SATA, Internal 1 Table 3 – Econolite-supplied Communications Server Item Description Quantity 131 Server: Dell PowerEdge R640 1 Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 5122 3.6G, 4C/8T, 10.4GT/s, 16.5M Cache 2 Memory: 16GB Memory 1 Hard Drive: 600GB 10k RPM SAS 12Gbps 2.5in Hot-plug Drive 2 Hard Drive Controller: PERC H330 Raid Controller for RAID 1 1 Operating System: Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Standard, 10 CAL 1 CD-ROM or DVD-ROM Drive: DVD+/-RW, SATA, Internal 1 Econolite’s Project Manager will review all the hardware/Commercial- off-the-Shelf (COTS) requirements with the City prior to procuring any items. All server components will be delivered to Econolite’s office for testing, software installation, and configuration. All workstations and laptops provided by the City for system access must meet Centracs recommended requirements. Any incompatible hardware not supplied by Econolite will be the responsibility of the City to resolve. Should additional components be necessary or requested, Econolite will provide an updated procurement list and corresponding pricing. 2.3 Factory Testing & Configuration Econolite will begin configuration of Centracs on a staging server at our Anaheim facility. We will install the software, prepare the base map graphic, and develop up to ten (10) intersection diagrams. Any additional intersection graphics will be developed by the City. If available, and to facilitate system configuration, we will request that the City provide the following information: • A list of all intersections including intersection number, main street, cross street, & geographic coordinates, if available • A list of all street names in the City, if available • Current phase diagrams & timing sheets for each intersection • Background images 2.4 Communications Network Coordination Econolite will use the communications network design/layout, including an IP Address Scheme and VLAN Assignments, as provided by the City. Econolite will coordinate with the City to ensure its compatibility with Centracs when installed/connected to the IP-based communications network. 2.5 On-Site System Installation & Integration Econolite will be responsible for all on-site Centracs system integration, to include configuring the system using the Centracs database and communications servers, and up to three (3) City-provided workstations. During on-site integration, Econolite will be responsible for integrating up to ten (10) Econolite ASC/3 and/or Cobalt controllers into the Centracs ATMS. Any additional intersection integration will be performed by the City. Communications Econolite assumes that the City will provide an end-to-end operational IP-based communications network (e.g., Ethernet-over-Copper, fiber-optic, wireless radio, etc. connections) from the intersection controllers to the location where the Centracs server will be housed. That is, the field network switches are already connected to the intersection controllers and that the City will provide all of the necessary communications network end equipment. 132 In this manner, Econolite will use the City’s existing IP-based field communications network and the City will tailor the central communications to ensure a working communications network is in-place and ready for system integration and testing. Performance of the system will be verified by demonstrating communication with each intersection controller via the status display and by uploads and downloads of the controller database. The outcome of this work ensures that all signals are online and made operational within Centracs. Performance of Centracs hinges on the ability of the network to deliver status/polling packets in a timely fashion. Please note that we cannot accept responsibility for the performance of third-party manufacturer’s equipment that we did not provide. Additionally, Centracs utilizes NTCIP and IP for network communications. These protocols do not contain any built-in security. Therefore, it is the City’s responsibility to secure its traffic control network both physically and logically from public access (Internet). 2.6 Documentation Throughout the duration of the project, Econolite will provide the City with project documentation as it relates to Centracs. In an effort to conserve paper and the environment, Econolite offers on-line help and electronic documentation. Econolite can print the required documents for an additional cost, but would like the City’s support in using electronic documentation as circumstances allow. 2.7 Training Econolite will provide up to two (2) days of training to the City after the system integration team demonstrates the system is functionally operational. The training will include instruction on system functionality, use, configuration, and administration. Training should be conducted at the TMC for optimal understanding of the system and should include no more than five (5) people. 2.8 Centracs Acceptance Testing After training is completed, an Econolite system engineer will perform the 1-day Centracs Acceptance Test (CAT) in conjunction with City personnel. Performing the acceptance test after the City has undergone training allows personnel a better understanding of the software and system performance. The CAT consists of an operational demonstration to the City of all major software components using a standard system acceptance test developed by Econolite. 2.9 Project Acceptance Upon successful completion of all project deliverables and the CAT, Econolite will provide a project letter of acceptance to the City. This letter recognizes project closure and reiterates the date from which each warranty hereunder will take effect. 2.10 On-Going System Support Econolite prides itself on providing unparalleled support and service to the ITS community and have done so for over 85-years. We provide factory warranties to back all of our products and software maintenance agreements for on-going service after factory warranties have expired for our systems. We have the capability of remotely connecting to any of our supported systems given a proper VPN connection, allowing our engineers to provide support, technical assistance, and/or troubleshooting from anywhere in the world. Warranty Econolite provides a one (1) year warranty beginning upon completion of acceptance testing for Econolite developed ATMS software. Our standard product warranty applies to all other Econolite products and the standard manufacturer’s warranty is applied to third-party products purchased by Econolite. 133 ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT Re: Scope of Services If the Scope of Services include construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance affecting real property or structures or improvements of any kind appurtenant to real property, the following apply: 1. Prevailing Wage Compliance. If Contracting Party is a contractor performing public works and maintenance projects, as described in this Section 1.3, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Contracting Party is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Sections 16000, et seq., (collectively, the “Prevailing Wage Laws”), and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 3.12.040, which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “Public works” and “Maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “Public works” or “Maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if construction work over twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and/or alterations, demolition, repair or maintenance work over fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is entered into or extended on or after January 1, 2015 by this Agreement,, Contracting Party agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws including, but not limited to, requirements related to the maintenance of payroll records and the employment of apprentices. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a “Public works” project unless registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) at the time the contract is awarded. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “Public works” or “Maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contracting Party will maintain and will require all subcontractors to maintain valid and current DIR Public Works contractor registration during the term of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall notify City in writing immediately, and in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours, after receiving any information that Contracting Party’s or any of its subcontractor’s DIR registration status has been suspended, revoked, expired, or otherwise changed. It is understood that it is the responsibility of Contracting Party to determine the correct salary scale. Contracting Party shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contracting Party’s 134 principal place of business and at the project site, if any. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contracting Party must forfeit to City TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contracting Party does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contracting Party also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., including Section 1776. In addition to the other indemnities provided under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall defend (with counsel selected by City), indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with performance of the Services, including, without limitation, any and all “Public works” (as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws), Contracting Party shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contracting Party shall require the same of all subcontractors. 2. Retention. Payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.0 of the Agreement. In accordance with said Sections, City shall pay Contracting Party a sum based upon ninety-five percent (95%) of the Contract Sum apportionment of the labor and materials incorporated into the Services under this Agreement during the month covered by said invoice. The remaining five percent (5%) thereof shall be retained as performance security to be paid to Contracting Party within sixty (60) days after final acceptance of the Services by the City Council of City, after Contracting Party has furnished City with a full release of all undisputed payments under this Agreement, if required by City. In the event there are any claims specifically excluded by Contracting Party from the operation of the release, City may retain proceeds (per Public Contract Code § 7107) of up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount in dispute. City’s failure to deduct or withhold shall not affect Contracting Party’s obligations under the Agreement. 3. Utility Relocation. City is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunkline utilities to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. City shall 135 reimburse Contracting Party for any costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contracting Party, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities. Contracting Party shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay arising from the removal or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities. 4. Trenches or Excavations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, in the event the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply: (a) Contracting Party shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contracting Party believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or (3) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. (b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party’s cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1.8 of the Agreement. (c) in the event that a dispute arises between City and Contracting Party whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contracting Party shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. Contracting Party shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting Parties. 5. Safety. Contracting Party shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, Contracting Party shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be 136 limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 6. Liquidated Damages. Not Used. 137 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is One Hundred and Forty-Two Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($142,300), exclusive of any sales tax and shipping fees (“Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in installment payments made in accordance with and in an amount identified in Contracting Party’s schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Pricing Summary The following pricing is valid for sixty days from the date of this proposal. Proposal pricing includes: •Centracs ATMS (75 intersection license) •Factory installation of the Centracs ATMS on Econolite-provided servers, including one main map using HERE data •On-site integration (up to 3-days on-site) •On-site training (up to 2-days on-site) •On-site testing (up to 1-day on-site) Detailed Pricing Item Quantity Unit Price Extended Price Centracs License, Installation, Integration, Training, & Testing L.S.$120,700 $120,700 Computer Hardware (Tables 1 & 2) L.S.$21,600 $21,600 Total Price $142,300 Terms and Conditions Payment terms are as follows: •Tax & shipping are not included in proposal pricing •For all Centracs ATMS items, payments shall follow the schedule below: •85% of Total Price due upon completion of on-site integration •10% of Total Price due upon completion of training •5% of Total Price due upon completion of acceptance testing 138 Exhibit C Page 1 of Schedule of Performance Contracting Party shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A of this Agreement in accordance with the Project Schedule below: Project Schedule Notice to Proceed Week 0 Kickoff Meeting Week 1 System Staging and Procurement Weeks 2 – 12 Graphics Development Weeks 11 – 12 Factory Setup & Testing Weeks 13 – 16 System Shipment to Project Site Week 17 Centracs ATMS System Integration Weeks 18 – 19 System Training Week 20 System Testing Week 21 Project Closure Week 22 139 Exhibit D Special Requirements None 140 E.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, the following policies shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A-VI: Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence) $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Non-contributory Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 (per claim and aggregate) Workers’ Compensation (per statutory requirements) Must include the following endorsements: Workers Compensation with Waiver of Subrogation Workers Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contracting Party’s acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contracting Party’s performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party’s performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. An endorsement evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) must be submitted concurrently with the execution of this Agreement and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Contracting Party shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or 141 Exhibit D Insurance Requirements damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Contracting Party, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Contracting Party, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contracting Party’s performance under this Agreement. If Contracting Party or Contracting Party’s employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contracting Party shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term “automobile” includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party’s performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Contracting Party and “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Contracting Party shall carry Workers’ Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker’s Compensation laws with employer’s liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Contracting Party shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self-insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Contracting Party shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Exhibit to the Contract Officer. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contracting Party’s obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. E.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contracting Party fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: 142 a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Contracting Party to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contracting Party hereunder until Contracting Party demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. c. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Contracting Party’s failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contracting Party may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contracting Party’s or its subcontractors’ performance of work under this Agreement. E.3 General Conditions Pertaining to Provisions of Insurance Coverage by Contracting Party. Contracting Party and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Contracting Party: 1. Contracting Party agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Contracting Party also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Contracting Party, or Contracting Party’s employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contracting Party agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contracting Party and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 143 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called “third party action over” claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Contracting Party shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City’s protection without City’s prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Contracting Party’s general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Contracting Party or deducted from sums due Contracting Party, at City option. 8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contracting Party or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 9. Contracting Party agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Contracting Party, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contracting Party. Contracting Party agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Contracting Party agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 10. Contracting Party agrees not to self-insure or to use any selfinsured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required 144 herein (with the exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self-insure its obligations to City. If Contracting Party’s existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Contracting Party, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contracting Party ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contracting Party, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 13. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Contracting Party of noncompliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 14. Contracting Party will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 15. Contracting Party shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Contracting Party’s insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and an additional insured endorsement is required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 145 16. The provisions of any workers’ compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Contracting Party under this agreement. Contracting Party expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. 17. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. 18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 19. The requirements in this Exhibit supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 20. Contracting Party agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contracting Party for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 21. Contracting Party agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contracting Party arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. 146 Exhibit F Indemnification F.1 Indemnity for the Benefit of City. a.Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, court costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b.Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by City), and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, court costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same arise out of the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct in the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party. c.Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to 147 indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of City, provided such negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct are determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been negligent or to have acted willfully and where City’s negligence or willful misconduct accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the Contracting Party will not be liable for that entire portion or percentage of liability attributable to the negligence or will misconduct of City. d. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1. Applicability of this Section F.1(d). Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a “design professional” as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including court costs, reimbursement of reasonable attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party.. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section F.1(d), the term “design professional” shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the 148 Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 149 150 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS POSSIBLE MOTORIZED SCOOTER OPERATIONS RECOMMENDATION Discuss and provide direction regarding possible motorized scooter sharing within the City. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •Cities throughout California have had wide ranging experiences with private motorized scooter operators (Operators). •City’s current Municipal Code does not have specific regulations on motorized scooter sharing services. •Nearby cities are beginning to be approached by Operators both announced and unannounced. FISCAL IMPACT Staff anticipates that costs would be incurred for administration, monitoring, and enforcement on any electric scooter sharing operation. The City would be able to capture business license fees from potential Operators. Based on Council direction, further analysis may be needed. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Stand-up electric scooter-share (Scooters) is a new shared-mobility service that Operators have deployed in multiple cities in California and all over the country over the past two years, typically targeting commercial corridors or activities. Operators promote the service as an affordable, rapid and convenient way to travel, alleviate traffic congestion, and reduce parking demand and carbon emissions. Operators offer users access to a pool of Scooters through smart phone applications, where users can locate and unlock a Scooter to use, incurring fees on a per-mile basis. Typically, users are warned to not ride on sidewalks or park in the right-of-way, to follow the rules of the road, and are provided preferred parking locations, such as near bike racks. Many Operators use short- term contractors to pick up, charge, and redistribute the Scooters to targeted areas. STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 151 State/City Law In September 2018, California enacted new laws regarding motorized vehicles, including the following: • Motorized scooters can not operate on a roadway with a speed limit in excess of 25 mph, unless within a Class II or Class IV bikeway. A Class II bikeway provides a striped lane for one-way bike travel on a street or highway and a Class IV bikeway is a bike lane for exclusive use of bicycles, physically separated from motor traffic with a vertical feature. Scooters may operate on a roadway with a speed limit greater than 25 mph, but less than 35 mph, if authorized by the local legislative body. • Motorized scooters can not operate on a sidewalk, except as necessary to enter or leave a property. • Scooters may not be placed laying on its side on a sidewalk or be parked on a sidewalk in any position that obstructs pedestrian path of travel. • No person under 18 years of age shall operate a motorized scooter without a helmet. Although the City of La Quinta’s Municipal Code (Code) does not have specific regulations on electric scooter-sharing services, Scooters would classify as a “vehicle” and “motorized vehicle” under state and City Law. The Code has restrictions on motorized vehicles including prohibiting operation on city sidewalks or on city property designated as a pedestrian mall, mall, plaza, or public gathering area, such as the Civic Center campus. Local Approaches (Attachment 1) Although Scooters are not currently prevalent in the Coachella Valley, two cities have addressed the topic through Council policy. One Operator, Bird, dispensed a fleet of Scooters in Palm Springs without seeking City approval before operation. Palm Springs Council ordered a cease and desist within 24 hours and the City confiscated more than 100 Scooters. On December 13, 2018, the Palm Desert Council adopted an urgency ordinance to prohibit mobility sharing in Palm Desert (Attachment 2). Palm Desert Council included language and direction to allow for a pilot program in the City. Palm Desert City Staff issued a request for qualifications/proposals for a Scooter Pilot Program and received five proposals from Operators. City staff gained valuable insight into criteria for considering a pilot program through this process. In January 2019, the Palm Desert Council voted down a Scooter Pilot Program. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Transportation Committee discussed the possibility of regional guidelines for Scooter sharing at its February 11th meeting. CVAG indicated that a regional approach to Scooter sharing would be beneficial since it is likely that riders will cross jurisdictional boundaries. The Transportation Committee suggested that each city should have its own rules and regulations for Scooters but that CVAG could provide suggestions for them to consider if they implement any regulations. 152 The City of Riverside is the only known City in Riverside County that has regularly operating Scooters within its City. Riverside did not draft specific ordinances relating to Scooters and instead allowed them to operate under current City and State laws for motorized vehicles. Other City Approaches California cities have had mixed experiences with Scooters, especially when Operators arrive unannounced without obtaining proper permits and licenses. Cities have expressed concern with dockless parking, as they can be left wherever users have reached their destination, which includes cases where Scooters block ADA access areas, driveways, crosswalks, and sidewalks. Scooters are found beneficial by some, who enjoy the affordable, rapid, and convenient way to travel. Below are other approaches cities have taken with Operators: • City of Culver City allowed two Operators to operate for six months, from July 2018 to January 2019, to collect data and receive public feedback before consideration of permanent regulations to allow scooters. (Attachment 3). • San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara have either adopted or proposed caps on initial and maximum-allowable fleet size. • City of Santa Monica adopted a pilot program with a dynamic fleet management system, which places no hard cap on number of vehicles and allows the Operator to increase/decrease the fleet size based on the average vehicle utilization. Santa Monica collects fees per Operator and Scooter. Any increase in fleet size requires City approval. • City of Oakland approved an ordinance establishing regulations on Scooters, including requiring Operators to distribute scooters equitably throughout the City, including a focus on low-income and minority households. ALTERNATIVES Council could direct Staff to not take any action on Scooter Operations. Prepared by: Carlos Flores, Associate Planner Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Desert Sun Scooter Article 2. Palm Desert Emergency Ordinance 3. Culver City Guidelines 153 154 ATTACHMENT 1 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 ATTACHMENT 2 165 166 167 168 ATTACHMENT 3 169 170 171 172 173 174 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS THE CITY’S RECYCLING EFFORTS/INITIATIVES RECOMMENDATION Discuss the City’s recycling efforts/initiatives. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is requiring local municipalities to increase their recycling programs. •The City contracts with Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC. (Burrtec) for recycling and solid waste handling services. •In 2018 China implemented policies that significantly reduced the amount of recycled plastic and contaminated plastic and paper materials the county may import. •CalRecycle has requested that municipalities increase efforts to reduce the amount of waste material, reduce the amount of contaminated disposed material, and educate the public regarding these matters. FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS For three decades, CalRecycle has been tasked with reducing municipal solid waste disposal and promoting recycling. During that time, the recycling and solid waste management requirements have changed dramatically. In particular, CalRecycle now implements a statewide 75 percent source reduction, recycling, and composting goal that must be achieved by 2020. CalRecycle must also achieve an even more ambitious organics disposal reduction goals by 2020 and 2025 and recover 20 percent of edible food for human consumption by 2025. As CalRecycle monitors progress towards meeting the 75 percent recycling goal and other waste reduction targets, the overall materials disposal statewide has increased for a fourth consecutive year with 35.2 million tons disposed in landfills and 7.5 million tons used in a disposal-related activity (6.0 pounds per person per day). This corresponds to a recycling rate of 44 percent, which is the lowest rate since the 75 percent recycling goal was established in 2011. STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 2 175 Californians generate solid waste at their homes and workplaces every day. Currently, less than half of this material is source-reduced, recycled, or composted, and the remainder is disposed at landfills (buried), disposed at transformation facilities (burned to produce energy) or handled through another disposal-related activity (third party refuse center). A majority of this disposed material could be diverted for higher and better uses to meet the 75 percent statewide recycling goal, although it is likely there will always be a small percentage that must be disposed or managed by alternative methods. In 2018, China implemented new standards that lowered the amount of recycled plastics and the amount of contaminated recycled paper and plastic materials that may be imported (the contamination rate must be lower than 0.5 percent wherein less than 0.5 percent can be unrecyclable material or another material). This acutely impacted the disposal of recyclable materials with much of this material now being disposed at landfills. In response, CalRecycle requested that municipalities increase programs to: •reduce the amount of waste material •reduce the amount of contaminated disposed material •educate the public regarding these matters. The City subsequently implemented the following initiatives: •updated recycling webpage •created recycling videos •added new recycling bins to Ben Franklin, Truman, and La Quinta Middle •working with Burrtec to continue to conduct business to business outreach. In discussions with CalRecycle and Burrtec, additional local impacts may be forthcoming as the amount of recycled material increases at storage facilities. Staff scheduled this Study Session to apprise Council of this situation, outline current and planned responses, and identify potential future considerations. Prepared by: Gil Villalpando, Assistant to the City Manager Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager 176 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS THE CITY’S PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPES RECOMMENDATION Discuss City's parkway and median landscapes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The Citywide Landscape & Lighting District 89-1 (L&L) maintenance is currently performed under two contracts; one for landscape and the other for lighting. •The parkway landscapes located north of Highway 111 are currently being renovated as part of a four-year Capital Improvement Project (CIP) project. •The new landscapes use the Desert Oasis landscape palette that was approved by Council. •Parkways and medians throughout the rest of the City are in need of a landscape improvement program. FISCAL IMPACT In Fiscal Year 2018/19 $1,582,700 is budgeted for (L&L) expenses. Contract Services $808,000 Utilities 320,000 City Staff 235,500 Staff Materials/Supplies 155,500 Internal Service Charges 63,700 TOTAL $1,582,700 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Citywide parkways, medians, and retention basins are currently maintained under two contracts; landscape ($515,657) and lighting ($77,216). The contract services account has a budget of $808,000 for these services with additional funding for items not covered, such as electrical repairs and minor landscape improvements. Aside from the current CIP project north of Highway 111, there is no funding for landscape renovations. STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 3 177 In 2017/18, the City began an accelerated renovation of north La Quinta landscapes (Attachment 1). These improvements entailed converting turf to the Desert Oasis landscape palette (Attachment 2), which uses hardscape textures and minimal plants to create an aesthetically pleasing appearance (Attachment 3) and lower installation, long-term maintenance, and water costs. New walkways, entrance lighting, and wall cleaning/painting accentuate the renovation effort. Since incorporation, the City’s parkways and medians have been developed in conjunction with the construction of adjacent residen tial, business, and road projects. This has created inconsistent landscapes throughout the City. As these landscapes have aged, many of these parkways and medians need more than basic maintenance to improve their appearance. Staff is seeking Council direction regarding establishing a program (similar to the north La Quinta landscape improvement project) wherein the City would refurbish City-owned parkways and medians south of Highway 111; the Highway 111 median refurbishment strategy will be developed when the Highway 111 Corridor planning effort concludes. The first step would entail receiving Council direction regarding the landscape pallet the City should employ. Staff would then secure the services of one of the on-call landscape architect firms to work with Staff and develop an implementation and funding strategy. As part of this effort, Staff would also conclude for Council consideration, the assessment of how the City should best structure the Facilities Department’s maintenance activities, and landscape maintenance management, staffing and contracting. Concluding this assessment dovetails with the upcoming corporation yard/Fritz Burns Park space planning initiative. The City of Rancho Mirage has a 10-year landscape replacement program. The City could adopt a similar program and continue the four-year Measure G funded program that is currently improving the landscapes in the north. Prepared by: Steve Howlett, Facilities Director Approved by: Frank J. Spevacek, City Manager Attachments: 1.North La Quinta Project Areas 2.Plants and Materials Pallet 3. North La Quinta rendering 178 QUINTERRAFY 2017-2018 MARBELLAFY 2020/21 L.Q. VISTASFY 2017/2018 L.Q. DEL OROFY 2016/2017COMPLETE ACACIAFY 2016/2017 L.Q. HIGHLANDSFY 2017/2018 RANCHO OCOTILLOFY 2018/2019 CACTUSFLOWERFY 2018/2019 SIERRADEL REYFY 2020/2021 TOPAZFY 2020/2021DESERTPRIDEFY 2019/2020Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Topaz MarabellaSierra Del ReyDesert Pride Budget $3,859,103Fiscal Year 2020/2021Cactus Flower Budget $1,408,356 Fiscal Year 2018/2019La Quinta Highlands/VistasRancho Ocotillo Budget $2,129,613 Fiscal Year 2017/2018Acacia BasinLa Quinta Highlands Basin Quinterra Budget $1,807,098 Fiscal Year 2016/2017La Quinta Del Oro CompleteLa Quinta Acacia Parkway Budget $634,046 Legend AATTACHMENT 1 179 180 LA QUINTA - DESERT OASIS & DESERT EFFICIENT THEMEPLANTING MATERIALSATTACHMENT 2181 182 LA QUINTA - DESERT EFFICIENT THEMELA QUINTA ACACIA ATTACHMENT 3 183 184 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: February 19, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2018- 0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 2008-085, AMENDMENT 1) TO REVISE NORTHERN PORTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT; CEQA: CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2018-0005; AND ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to: A. Certify Environmental Assessment 2018-0005, and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act; and B. Approve Specific Plan 2018-0002 (Specific Plan 2008-085, Amendment 1) to allow for commercial and/or mixed-use development on the northern portion of the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan, subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval, and incorporating the recommended changes from the Planning Commission. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •The Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan (Plan) was approved May 18, 2010, for up to 200 affordable residential dwelling units and up to 82,000 square feet of automobile sales and related uses. •The City (Applicant) proposes an amendment to allow for commercial and/or mixed-use development on the northern portion of the Plan and to revise commercial development standards (Attachment 1). FISCAL IMPACT – None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The project site is approximately 22 acres, located on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 300 feet east of Dune Palms Road. The site is bounded on the north by Highway 111, on the south by the Desert Sands Unified School District administration and service facilities, and on the east by the existing Komar Desert Center and Costco. Vista Coralina Lane runs PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 185 through the middle and western boundary of the project site and separates the North Parcel from the South Parcel. The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (RDA) purchased the property in 2007 to facilitate affordable housing and infill commercial development. In 2010, the Plan was adopted to facilitate a mix of auto-oriented retail and residential uses. The Plan guides development and sets forth a comprehensive planning and regulatory framework. The North Parcel, currently vacant, was envisioned for auto dealerships and associated services. The South Parcel was developed with the Coral Mountain Apartments which consist of 176 affordable apartment units. The Applicant requests Plan amendment approval to allow for commercial and/or mixed-use development on the North Parcel as allowed in the underlying Regional Commercial zone (Attachment 2). Plan changes include removing specific references to auto retail, and reference commercial and/or mixed-use while still allowing auto retail. The amendment also proposes the following revisions to the commercial development standards: 1. Removal of maximum commercial building square footage of 82,000 square feet of gross floor area and allow commercial buildings to be exempt from floor area ratio requirements. 2. Allow a maximum height of 60 feet throughout the commercial area, including allowing the maximum 60-foot height within the first 150 feet from Highway 111 right-of-way. 3. Allow parking and drive aisles within the 50-foot landscape setback along Highway 111. These changes allow for the project site to develop with a broader set of commercial and/or mixed-uses, as allowed in the underlying Regional Commercial (CR) zone. The City is working on a hotel development that would be located on a 3-acre portion of the North Parcel. The amendments to the Specific Plan are necessary to allow the hotel development. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project and determined that although the project has the potential to generate significant environmental effects relating to traffic, biological resources, cultural resources, air quality, and noise, mitigation measures imposed on the project would reduce these effects to a less than significant level. The MND is included as Exhibit A of the Resolution. The MND appendices can be found here https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=39171. The MND was circulated for public review to applicable agencies and interested parties for 20 days from January 2 through January 22, 2019. Comments from Imperial Irrigation District, Sunline, Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, South Coast Air Quality Management 186 District, and Desert Sands Unified School District have been received and responses to these comment letters were drafted (Attachment 3). AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Notice Notice of public hearing was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 8, 2019. To date, no comments have been received. SB-18 and AB-52 Native American Tribal Consultation Per SB-18 and AB-52 consultation requirements, information regarding the proposed Specific Plan amendment and associated environmental document was forwarded to those tribes referenced on the Tribal Consultation List provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Staff consulted with tribes who requested information or consultation. Their monitoring recommendations have been incorporated in the Conditions of Approval and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Planning Commission (PC) Review At its regular meeting of January 22, 2019, the PC recommended approval of the Plan amendments with changes. PC was concerned about potentially having buildings up to 60 feet high near the roadway throughout the commercial area of the site and placement of parking and drive aisles in the 50-foot landscape setback along Highway 111. PC made the following recommendations: • Enforce image corridor height requirements on the site, which limits the maximum structure height 22 feet for all buildings within 150 feet of Highway 111. • Don’t allow parking and drive aisles within the landscape setback. After the PC meeting, Staff met with the Highway 111 Area Plan consultant, Rangwala Associates (RA), and the applicant of the proposed hotel to discuss how to address the PC recommendations with the hotel site design. During this discussion, RA pointed out the benefit of planning for the integration of other potential uses on the entire vacant site with the proposed hotel use. ALTERNATIVES 1. Council could approve the Plan amendments as originally proposed, without PC’s recommendations. 2. Council could modify the proposed Plan amendments. Prepared by: Carlos Flores, Associate Planner Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Project Information 2. Specific Plan Amendment 3. Initial Study Comments 187 188 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2019 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EASE OF DUNE PALMS ROAD CASE NUMBERS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2018-0005 SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, AMD 1) APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 19th day of February, 2019, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by City of La Quinta to approve Amendment No. 1 for the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan that would allow for commercial and/or mixed use development on the northern 10± acre portion of the Specific Plan area that was originally intended for auto retail, more particularly described as: APNs: 600-020-053 & 600-020-055 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on February 8, 2019, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.250.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Environmental Assessment [Exhibit A]: 1. As conditioned, proposed application will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either 189 City Council Resolution 2019 - Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 (adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration) Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment No. 1) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 February 19, 2019 Page 2 of 6 indirectly, or directly, in that no significant unmitigated impacts were identified by Environmental Assessment 2018-0005. 2. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level. 3. There is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources of the habitat on which the wildlife depends. 4. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable can be mitigated to be less than significant. 5. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Impacts associated with biological resources, transportation/traffic, cultural resources, air quality, and noise can be mitigated to be less than significant. Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment 1) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.240.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Specific Plan: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed Specific Plan amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan in that it will result in the 190 City Council Resolution 2019 - Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 (adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration) Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment No. 1) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 February 19, 2019 Page 3 of 6 development of approximately 10 acres of commercial and/or mixed-use development which is permitted in the General Commercial land use designation. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals and Policies: • Goal LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. • Policy LU-2.2 which requires Specific Plans for projects proposing flexible development standards that differ from the Zoning Ordinance. The Specific Plan will allow for exemption from floor area ratio requirements, allow for parking and drive aisles in the landscape setbacks, and maximum heights of 60 feet within the first 150 feet from Highway 111 right-of-way to broaden the range of uses allowed in the Specific Plan Area as allowed under the Regional Commercial zone. • Policy LU-7.1 which encourages the use of mixed-use development in appropriate locations. The amendment allows mixed-use development in a Regional Commercial zone, where the Mixed Use Overlay applies. • Program CIR-1.12.b which encourages mixed-use and contiguous commercial development to provide optimum internal connections between uses. The Specific Plan amendment encourages mixed-use and commercial development on the project site to provide optimum internal connections. • Policy AQ‐1.6 which states that proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) analyzed these and determined that mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 191 City Council Resolution 2019 - Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 (adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration) Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment No. 1) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 February 19, 2019 Page 4 of 6 • Policy BIO-1.2 which states that site‐specific, species-specific surveys shall be required for species not covered by the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The project’s MND includes mitigation that requires pre- construction surveys for burrowing owl, which is not a covered species under the MSHCP. • GOAL CUL-1 which supports protection of significant archaeological, historic and paleontological resources which occur in the City. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to include a tribal monitor during ground-disturbing activities. • GOAL N‐1 which supports a healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort character. The project’s MND includes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant levels. • GOAL GEO-1 which supports the protection of the residents’ health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. The project’s MND determined that with implementation of required building and seismic code standards, the project would have a less than significant impact on geological resources. • Policy FH-1.3 which states that the City shall continue to implement development standards that provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and are consistent with local and regional stormwater management plans. The project is consistent with this policy since underground retention will be provided that will contain the 100-year storm for the site. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the proposed Specific Plan amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA. The Design and 192 City Council Resolution 2019 - Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 (adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration) Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment No. 1) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 February 19, 2019 Page 5 of 6 Development Director has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and mitigation measures have been incorporated. 3.Land Use Compatibility The proposed Specific Plan incorporates a land use that is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties. The property will continue to be zoned as Regional Commercial on the northern portion of the site and Commercial Park on the southern portion of the site. The amendment allows the northern portion to incorporate a broader range of commercial and mixed-use land uses that are allowed in the Regional Commercial zone. 4.Property Suitability The uses permitted in the Specific Plan are suitable and appropriate for the subject property in that the site is relatively flat, vacant, and the area can be served by all necessary public services and utilities. The proposed project is located adjacent to Highway 111 and continues the development of Highway 111 as a major commercial and economic corridor with a broad range of goods and services offered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are true and correct, and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case; SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby approves Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 and Specific Plan 2018-0002 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the Environmental Assessment – Environmental Initial Study (Exhibit A) and Conditions of Approval attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 19th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: 193 City Council Resolution 2019 - Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 (adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration) Specific Plan 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amendment No. 1) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 February 19, 2019 Page 6 of 6 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: ___________________________ MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 194 CITY OF LA QUINTA 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Main Phone: (760) 777-7000 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY Project Title: Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment and Site Development Permit 2018-0007 Case No: SP 2018-0002 (SP 2008-085, Amd 1), SDP 2018-0007, and EA 2018-0005 Lead Agency City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7000 Applicant: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact Person: Carlos Flores Associate Planner Design & Development Department City of La Quinta (760) 777-7069 Project Location: South side of Highway 111, approx. 300 feet east of Dune Palms Road La Quinta, CA 92253 Riverside County APN: 600-020-053 General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: Regional Commercial (CR) Surrounding Land Uses: North: Highway 111, vacant (northwest), commercial (northeast) South: Coral Mountain Apartments, Desert Sands Unified School District facility East: commercial (Komar/Costco Center) West: commercial, office, mini-storage, Dune Palms Road EXHIBIT A 195 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -2- Description of the Project: Project Location: The Specific Plan area is located on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 300 feet east of Dune Palms Road in the City of La Quinta, California (Exhibits 1 through 4). The site is generally rectangular in shape with a “panhandle” at the southern end that extends about 260 feet west to connect to Dune Palms Road. Project Background: In 2010, the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan (SP 08-085) was adopted to facilitate the development of a 22-acre site with a mix of auto-oriented retail and residential uses. The Specific Plan provides goals, policies, and actions to guide development in the Specific Plan area and sets forth a comprehensive planning and regulatory framework for development of the Plan area. The northern 10± acres of the site were envisioned for auto dealerships and associated service centers, and the southern 12± acres were planned for affordable housing with up to 200 units. After adoption, the southern 12± acres were developed with the Coral Mountain Apartments which consist of 176 affordable apartment units. An access road, Vista Coralina Lane, was built from Dune Palms Road to the Komar/Costco shopping center to the west, and provides direct access to the apartment complex. The northern 10± acres remain vacant. Project Description: The purpose of the proposed Specific Plan amendment is to allow for commercial and/or mixed use (MU) (commercial and residential) development on the northern 10± acre portion of the Specific Plan area that was originally intended for auto retail. In addition, the Specific Plan Amendment proposes the following revisions to the commercial development standards set forth in Section 3.2.2 of the Specific Plan: 1.Removal of maximum commercial building square footage of 82,000 square feet gross floor area. 2.The maximum height shall be 60 feet throughout the commercial area, including within the first 150 feet from the Highway 111 right-of-way. A Site Development Permit is also required for approval of the architectural and landscaping plans of the proposed hotel, which will occur on the eastern 3± acres of the 10 acre site. The hotel is proposed as a business hotel, with 108 rooms, a pool, sports court and ancillary facilities. The hotel is proposed to be four stories in height. Parking is provided around the perimeter of the hotel building (Exhibit 5). The remaining 7 acres have no active development proposals. This Initial Study analyzes potential impacts associated with maximum buildout of the following development scenario: •108-room business hotel, •305,000 square feet of retail use, and •140 units of multi-family housing. 196 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -3- The site is currently designated General Commercial (CG) in the General Plan and is zoned for Regional Commercial (CR). Therefore, the proposed amendment would not require a General Plan Amendment or Zone Change. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that primary access will occur on Highway 111 and that existing access to Vista Coralina Lane and Dune Palms Road at the south end of the project will remain a public access point. Utilities and Service Providers The following agencies and companies will provide service to the project site: 1. Sanitary Sewer: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) 2. Water: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) 3. Electricity: Imperial Irrigation District (IID) 4. Gas: The Gas Company 5. Telephone: Frontier 6. Storm Drain: City of La Quinta Other Required Public Agencies Approval: Coachella Valley Water District 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -9- ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance 207 208 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -11- EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 209 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -12- I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Source: 2035 General Plan; La Quinta Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code; California Department of Transportation (California Scenic Highway Mapping System); http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/, accessed September 2018; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; “City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Study,” ULI Technical Assistance Panel, July 23, 2018. Setting The project site is in the City of La Quinta in the central portion of the Coachella Valley, which is surrounded by the San Bernardino, San Jacinto, and Santa Rosa Mountain Ranges. The mountains have a significant rise over the low-lying valley floor, with peak elevations of 11,489 feet, 8,716 feet, and 10,834 feet, respectively. The Salton Sea, at an elevation of approximately 200 feet below sea level, is in the southeast portion of the valley. The subject property is on the valley floor and consists of relatively level terrain with elevations ranging between 55 and 60 feet above mean sea level. The foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains are approximately 1 mile west and 2.5 miles south of the subject property. They provide a dramatic visual contrast to the valley floor and an important visual backdrop for the project area. The immediate project vicinity is developed with one- and two-story commercial, residential, and other buildings, as well as paved roadways, parking lots, traffic signals, and other elements of the built environment. Surrounding buildings and landscaping block ground-level views of the foothills and lower elevations; however, upper peaks are generally visible. No significant scenic vistas occur to the north or east. The subject property is adjacent to Highway 111, which is designated a City Image Corridor (General Plan Exhibit II-4). 210 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -13- Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts to scenic vistas. The northern (vacant) portion of the Specific Plan area would be developed with commercial and/or mixed-use components and increase potential square footage compared to the adopted Specific Plan. It would result in construction of a 4-story hotel at the northeasterly corner of the site adjacent to Highway 111 (Exhibit 5). Maximum building heights for commercial structures would be 60 feet, including those up to the Highway 111 right-of-way. Highway 111 forms the northerly Specific Plan boundary and is designated an Image Corridor in the City’s 2035 General Plan (General Plan Exhibit II-4). Although the Municipal Code restricts building heights within 150 feet of an Image Corridor, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would remove this requirement. Mixed-use development is proposed, and proposed building heights of 60 feet are consistent with Municipal Code Section 9.140.090 which permits maximum building heights of 60 feet in Mixed Use districts with an underlying Regional Commercial (CR) zone. Varied building heights, higher intensity development, and flexible development standards are also envisioned along Highway 111 in the City’s Highway 111 Corridor Study (2018). Maximum building heights for residential structures would remain unchanged from the current Specific Plan (40 feet, or 22 feet for all buildings within 150 feet of a general plan-designated image corridor, i.e. Highway 111). Should future structures be built to the maximum 60-foot height, they could block views of the Santa Rosa Mountains from surrounding properties immediately north and east of the subject property, as well as from adjacent sections of Highway 111. They would have no impact on mountain views seen from the Coral Mountain Apartments on the southern portion of the Specific Plan area because mountain views are to the west and south. The Specific Plan site is relatively flat on the low- lying valley floor, with elevations roughly equal to that of surrounding properties, and no structures or improvements would be built on elevated terrain. Thoughtful site planning and architectural design strategies, such as the use of view corridors and walkways, balconies, recessed openings and courtyards, would provide opportunities to minimize the sense of mass that can occur with large retail buildings. These strategies and distance from the mountains (1+ miles) will reduce impacts to scenic vistas to less than significant levels. b) No Impact. The project will not damage scenic resources because no scenic resources, such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings are located onsite. The subject property is not located along or near an existing or proposed state scenic highway. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts on the existing visual character of the site and surroundings. The Specific Plan area is adjacent to Highway 111 in the City’s commercial core. Surrounding development includes retail, office, restaurant, residential, and public facility uses, as well as paved arterials, parking lots, and other urban infrastructure. 211 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -14- The project is consistent with the current visual character of the project area. It would facilitate multi-family dwelling units on the northern portion of the Specific Plan area, which would be compatible and consistent with the existing 176-unit Coral Mountain Apartments on the southern portion. It would also facilitate commercial development, consistent with existing commercial uses on adjacent parcels and along the Highway 111 corridor. Project design would be governed by the Specific Plan to provide a unified, cohesive project; the Specific Plan encourages a high level of harmony and consistency with the surrounding community, including architectural design that blends visually with the existing character of Highway 111. Impacts will be less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The project will result in less than significant impacts relating to light and glare. The project site is in a highly urbanized area on Highway 111, the City’s primary commercial corridor. The southern portion of the site is developed with multi-family residential units and illuminated by outdoor and indoor lighting, including stationary and mobile (vehicle) light sources. Future development of the northern portion of the site can be expected to increase levels of light and glare from interior and exterior building lighting, safety and security lighting, landscape lighting, and vehicles accessing the site. Glare can also be expected from building windows. The project will increase potential building square footage compared to the adopted Specific Plan, which can be expected to result in an associated increase in onsite lights and glare. However, Specific Plan Section 4.1.2 (Site Lighting) specifies that all lighting shall comply with the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 9.100.150 Outdoor Lighting). Lights will be properly shielded to minimize spillage onto adjacent properties, and new outdoor lighting would be limited to the minimum levels necessary for safety. The City’s standards prohibiting reflective surfaces will assure that glare impacts are less than significant. Lighting and glare levels are not expected to exceed typical levels within the surrounding urban environment. Impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 212 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -15- II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Source: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Conservation, January 2012, and Riverside County Important Farmland Map, 2016. Setting The project site is adjacent to Highway 111 in the City’s commercial urban core. The southern portion of the site is developed with multi-family residential units, parking lots, and associated improvements. The northern portion of the site is vacant. There are no active agricultural or forestry lands in the project vicinity. Lands surrounding the subject property are either developed or designated for urban land uses. Discussion of Impacts a-e) No Impact. The project will not impact agricultural resources because none exist on the subject property or its vicinity. 213 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -16- Prime Farmland The project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” on the Important Farmlands Map for Riverside County. No prime or unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance exists within the project site or vicinity. The project site is not located on or near any property zoned or otherwise intended for agricultural uses. Therefore, no impact to state-designated agricultural land would occur. Williamson Act No land on or near the project site is under a Williamson Act contract. The proposed Specific Plan amendments will not conflict with zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. Forest Land The project site is designated for urban uses. There are no forest land or timberland areas in the project vicinity. The proposed Specific Plan amendments will not conflict with existing zoning or cause rezoning of forest land or timberland resources, and no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 214 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -17- III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Source: 2035 General Plan; “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology,” prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised, July 2008; “2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan,” August 1, 2003; CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. Setting The Coachella Valley is in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). All development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The project site is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 30, which includes monitoring stations in Palm Springs, Indio, and Thermal. Criteria air pollutants are contaminants for which state and federal air quality standards have been established. The Salton Sea Air Basin exceeds state and federal standards for fugitive dust (PM10) and ozone (O3) and is in attainment/unclassified for PM2.5. Ambient air quality in the SSAB, including the project site, does not exceed state and federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, or vinyl chloride. Build out of the Specific Plan area will result in site disturbance during construction and long-term impacts associated with operation of the project, as described below. 215 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -18- Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with implementation of an air quality plan. The subject site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) and will be subject to SCAQMD’s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The AQMP is a comprehensive plan that establishes control strategies and guidance on regional emission reductions for air pollutants. The SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments, and cooperates actively with all State and federal government agencies. SCAG adopted the 2016- 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) to comply with metropolitan planning organization (MPO) requirements under the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act. The Growth Management chapter of the RTP/SCS forms the basis of land use and transportation controls of the AQMP. Projects that are consistent with the projections of population forecasts are considered consistent with the AQMP. The proposed project is consistent with the City’s land use designations and would not impact the population or employment forecasts for the City, insofar as future development will accommodate the growth anticipated in the long term by SCAG. The AQMP is based, in part, on the land use plans of the jurisdictions in the region. Since the proposed land uses are allowed under current General Plan and zoning designations, additional development that would occur in conjunction with the proposed project has been planned for in the AQMP. Improvements in technology and reductions in emissions associated with improved building standards in the Building Code will further improve project-related air quality by imposing stringent standards for the reduction of energy use. The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the AQMP. It will be subject to rules and guidelines set forth in the AQMP and will not conflict with or obstruct its implementation. No impact is anticipated. b) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 was used to project air quality emissions generated by the project (see Appendix A). Criteria air pollutants will be released during construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis below addresses short-term construction-related emissions and ongoing operational emissions. Only the northernmost 10 acres of the Specific Plan area have been analyzed for air quality impacts because the southernmost 12± acres are already developed with the Coral Mountain Apartments. 216 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -19- Construction Emissions The construction period includes site preparation, grading, hauling, paving, building construction, and application of architectural coatings. For analysis purposes and conservative projections, it is assumed that buildout will occur over a one-year period. In actuality, the hotel is planned for immediate construction, but no development plans have been proposed for the remaining 7 acres of the site. The following assumptions were used: • Total acreage: 10 acres • Total building square footage (retail, hotel, residential): 601,816 SF • Asphalt surfaces: 43,560 SF • Total import of materials: 0 CY • Total export of materials: 0 CY • SCAQMD Rule 403: Fugitive Dust Control standards applied as required • SCAQMD Rule 1113: Architectural Coatings standards applied as required. Table 1 Maximum Daily Construction-Related Emissions Summary (pounds per day) Construction Emissions CO NOx ROG SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Daily Maximum 47.59 54.60 59.26 0.09 9.58 6.11 SCAQMD Thresholds 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds? No No No No No No Outputs show average of winter and summer emissions. Includes implementation of standard fugitive dust control measures. Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2. As shown in Table 1, emissions generated by construction activities will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for any criteria pollutant. The data reflect average daily mitigated emissions over the one-year construction period, including summer and winter weather conditions. Applicable standard requirements and best management practices include, but are not limited to, the implementation of a dust control and management plan in conformance with SCQAMD Rule 403, proper maintenance and limited idling of heavy equipment, phasing application of architectural coatings, and the use of low-polluting architectural paint and coatings. Construction-related impacts are considered less than significant. Operational Emissions Operational emissions are ongoing emissions that will occur over the life of the project. They include area source emissions, emissions from energy demand (electricity), and mobile source (vehicle) emissions. The emissions analysis assumes the project would open in 2020. Traffic generation rates were derived from the project-specific traffic report (Appendix B), which projected that the project would generate an estimated 8,586 daily trips. Table 2 provides a summary of projected operational emissions. 217 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -20- Table 2 Maximum Daily Operational-Related Emissions Summary (pounds per day) Operational Emissions1 CO NOx ROG SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Daily Maximum 175.55 161.44 35.33 0.54 26.66 7.76 SCAQMD Thresholds 550.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 55.00 Exceeds? No Yes No No No No 1Average of winter and summer emissions. Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2. As shown in Table 2, operational emissions will exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds of significance for NOx but will not exceed thresholds for other criteria pollutants. Emissions projections represent worst-case conditions, and actual emissions may be lower than projected. Projected NOx exceedances are largely associated with the number of vehicle trips expected to be generated at project buildout. Traffic improvements recommended in the project-specific traffic impact analysis are expected to reduce project-related traffic impacts; however, mitigation measures that decrease the overall number of trips generated have not been identified, and impacts, therefore, cannot be reduced to less than significant levels. The subject property is in the Regional Commercial (CR) zone, and proposed land uses are consistent with those allowed in the CR zone. Impacts of development in the CR zone were analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The EIR found that potential air quality impacts could not be mitigated to less than significant levels, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were approved by the City. Project benefits are found to outweigh potential air quality impacts, consistent with that identified in the General Plan EIR. The project is consistent with the City’s vision for this parcel as described in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which provides detailed goals, policies and programs for the long term growth of Highway 111 as a Mixed Use corridor. Benefits of the proposed project include maximizing the development potential of a vacant parcel along the primary regional commercial corridor, expanding the City’s tax revenue base and share of the hospitality (hotel) industry, and realizing the benefits of mixed-use development by placing residential uses in proximity to employment and retail centers. c) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin is classified as a “non-attainment” area for PM10 and ozone. The 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan was adopted for the purpose of achieving attainment. It established strict standards for dust management for development proposals. PM10 As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the project will contribute to incremental increases in regional PM10 emissions but will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. It will be required to implement SIP requirements and SCAQMD rules and regulations for the management of dust. The project will result in less than significant impacts associated with PM10 emissions. 218 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -21- Ozone As shown in Table 2, the project will result in exceedances of NOx thresholds during operation. NOx is a precursor to ozone, for which the Coachella Valley is in non- attainment. Therefore, the project will contribute to cumulative increases in ozone precursors. As stated in III.b, impacts of development in the CR zone were analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The EIR found that potential air quality impacts could not be mitigated to less than significant levels, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were made by the City. The proposed project falls under that override. Project benefits are found to outweigh potentially significant air quality impacts. d) Less Than Significant Impact. The nearest sensitive receptors to the subject property are multi-family residential units at Coral Mountain Apartments. The apartments are located on the southern portion of the Specific Plan area, approximately 60 feet south of the subject property. Future construction and operation on the subject property will generate pollutant emissions, including NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, that could impact residents at the apartments. To evaluate potential project impacts to sensitive receptors, SCAQMD’s LST (localized significance thresholds) mass rate look-up tables were used. LSTs are derived based on location of the project (the Coachella Valley is in Source Receptor Area 30); emission rates of NOx, CO, PM2.5, and PM10; and distance to the nearest exposed sensitive receptor. The subject property totals 10± acres; 3± acres are currently proposed for hotel development, and the remaining 7± acres would be available for future mixed use development. Given the size of the parcel, it is unlikely that more than 5 acres would be disturbed on any given day. Therefore, the 5-acre tables at a distance of 25 meters were used for LST analysis. Table 3 summarizes on-site emission concentrations and the associated LST. Table 3 Mitigated Localized Significance Thresholds Worse-Case Emissions (pounds per day) CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 Construction 47.59 54.60 9.58 6.11 LST Threshold* 2,292.00 304.00 14.00 8.00 Exceed? No No No No Operation1 14.65 4.58 0.41 0.41 LST Threshold* 2,292.00 304.00 4.00 2.00 Exceed? No No No No Emission Source: CalEEMod model, version 2016.3.2 LST Threshold Source: LST Mass Rate Look-up Table, SCAQMD. 1. Operational emissions that affect sensitive receptors are limited to on-site area emissions. Energy and mobile emissions occur off-site. The above analysis finds that LSTs will not be exceeded at the nearest sensitive receptors. As a result, impacts associated with local significance thresholds to sensitive receptors will be less than significant. 219 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -22- e) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts from objectionable odors. Typical odor-generating land uses include, but are not limited to, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, composting facilities, and heavy industry. Build out of the project would result in retail stores, residences, and a hotel, none of which are typically associated with objectionable odors. Land uses would be consistent with surrounding development and the Highway 111 corridor. Diesel fumes from construction equipment and delivery trucks could be found to be objectionable; however, construction is temporary, and the number and types of deliveries typical of retail, hotel, and residential development are limited in number and frequency. Impacts would be reduced further by SCAQMD Rule 402 (Nuisances) and SCAQMD Best Available Control Technology Guidelines, which limit potential objectionable odor impacts during the proposed project’s long-term operational phase. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: The following measures will minimize potential project-related air quality impacts to the extent possible. AQ-1 The following measures shall be implemented during project earth moving, grading and construction activities: • Construction equipment, delivery trucks, worker vehicles, and haul trucks will limit idling time to no more than 5 minutes. • The grading contractor shall certify in writing that all construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained in good operating condition. Certification shall be provided to City Engineer for review and approval. • Cover all transported loads of soils, wet materials prior to transport, provide freeboard (space from the top of the material to the top of the truck) to reduce PM10 and deposition of particulate matter during transportation. • Diesel-powered construction equipment shall utilize aqueous diesel fuels and be equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts. • Water site and equipment morning and evening and during all earth-moving operations. • Wash off trucks as they leave the project site as necessary to control fugitive dust emissions. • Construction equipment and materials shall be sited as far away from residential and park uses as practicable. AQ-2 All mixed use and retail commercial projects within the Specific Plan area shall be subject to the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: AQ-A The City Engineer and Public Works inspector shall regularly monitor the construction site to assure that the measures are implemented throughout earth moving and grading operations. Responsible Party: City Engineer, Public Works Division 220 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -23- IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Source: 2035 General Plan; “Baseline Biological Survey of the San Miguel de Allende Project Site, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California,” AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., November 2008; “Preliminary Determination of Jurisdictional Limits, United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Waters of the United States, Including Wetlands and State Waters Subject to California Department of Fish and Game Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement,” AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., December 2008; “Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan,” 2007; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010. 221 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -24- Setting The subject property is adjacent to Highway 111, the City’s principal commercial corridor, and surrounded by paved roads and urban development. The southern 12± acres of the property are developed with a local road (Vista Coralina Lane), 176 multi-family residential units, paved parking lots, and associated improvements. A site-specific biological survey and jurisdictional delineation were prepared in 2008 to evaluate biological conditions and potential impacts of the (now approved) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan. The study found that the eastern portions of the site were previously disturbed by development of a mobile home park, and the biological value of the site was diminished. However, the potential existed for some locally occurring plant and animal species to be impacted by the project, and mitigation measures were established. Permitting for impacts to jurisdictional waters (La Quinta Evacuation Channel) was also required. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation (CV MSHCP) but is not within a MSHCP-designated Conservation Area. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The proposed project will result in grading and other ground disturbances on the northern (vacant) portion of the Specific Plan area. A biological survey was conducted on the subject property in 2008 in conjunction with preparation of the (now adopted) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan. Of the 22 sensitive species that could potentially occur in the general project vicinity, most had no to low likelihood of being present on the subject site. Those with a higher likelihood of occurring included: Coachella Valley giant sand-treader cricket (low-moderate), Flat-tailed horned lizard (low-moderate), Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard (moderate-high), Burrowing owl (low-moderate), Palm Springs pocket mouse (moderate), and Coachella Valley round-tailed ground squirrel (moderate). Additionally, the La Quinta General Plan (Exhibit III-2) indicates that the subject property contains modeled habitat for Palm Springs pocket mouse. Development facilitated by the proposed project will result in onsite grading and construction activities. Project-related impacts could include the permanent loss of native habitat and some individual sensitive species. All species listed above are covered under the CV MSHCP, and project-related impacts will be mitigated by payment of standard CV MSHCP mitigation fees (see IV.f, below). Trees and bushes occurring on the project site have the potential to harbor nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Disturbance of nests prior to the birds’ fledging would represent a potentially significant impact which requires mitigation. Measure BIO-1, below, assures the preparation of pre- construction survey(s) if vegetation is to be removed during the nesting season (generally between January 1 and August 31). With implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant levels. 222 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -25- Although Burrowing owls are a covered species under the MSHCP, they nest and shelter underground and are, therefore, more vulnerable to being crushed or trapped by construction activity. Disturbance of the site has the potential to impact nesting or roosting owls, which would constitute a significant impact to the species. Protocols for detecting Burrowing owls have been developed and impacts to the species will be mitigated through implementation of mitigation measure BIO-2, below. b, c) No Impact. The proposed project will not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities because none occur onsite (AMEC, 2008), and permitting for impacts to jurisdictional waters was already obtained in conjunction with approval of the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan and construction of the apartments to the south. In 2008, AMEC completed a site-specific delineation of limits for wetlands and jurisdictional waters to evaluate potential impacts of the (then-proposed) Specific Plan. The studies determined that the site did not contain wetlands or other natural drainages, but the project would construct a stormwater conveyance pipeline leading to a stormwater outfall structure that discharges into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel (LQEC) approximately 425 feet to the southeast. The LQEC empties into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel and Salton Sea and, therefore, was determined to be a “Water of the United States” (but not a wetland) under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, and also subject to jurisdiction under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Wildlife Code. The necessary permits were obtained in conjunction with construction of the Coral Mountain Apartments. The outfall was sized to accommodate drainage from the entire Specific Plan site, and therefore, no additional permits are required. No project-related impacts will occur. d) No Impact. The proposed project will not interfere with wildlife movement corridors or nursery sites because none occur onsite. The subject property is in an urban area and surrounded by roadways and commercial and other types of development on all sides. The southern portion of the site is developed with multi-family residential uses. Due to surrounding human activity for many decades, the site does not contain features that are suitable as a migratory wildlife corridor or nursery site. No project- related impacts will occur. e) No Impact. The project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, because no such resources occur onsite. No impact will occur. f) No Impact. The project will not conflict with a habitat conservation plan. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP) and will be required to pay standard MSHCP mitigation fees. The site is not located within a CV MSHCP-designated Conservation Area and, therefore, is not subject to additional measures. The proposed project will not conflict with the provisions of the CV MSHCP or any other approved habitat conservation plan. No impact will occur. 223 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -26- Mitigation Measures: BIO-1: To comply with the MBTA, a nesting bird survey will be required prior to the removal of any vegetation or trees, or grading on the site, if such activity is to occur between January 1 and August 31 of any year. The nesting bird survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist and end no less than 3 days prior to the activity. The biologist’s report of the survey and any measures required to protect nesting birds shall be approved by the City prior to the initiation of any activity. This mitigation measure will not apply if vegetation or tree removal, or grading, are proposed between September 1 and December 31 of any year. BIO-2: Within 30 days and prior to the initiation of any grubbing or grading activities on the site, a protocol-compliant Burrowing Owl survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If the species is identified onsite, CDFW shall be consulted, and mitigation measures shall be implemented to avoid or relocate the owls. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: BIO-A The City Building Division shall coordinate to ensure that CV MSHCP mitigation fees are paid. Documentation of payment shall be maintained in the Building Division files. Responsible Party: Building Division BIO-B The Planning Division shall review and approve all pre-construction surveys prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities onsite. The Planning Division shall preserve these studies in the project files. Responsible Party: Planning Division 224 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -27- V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Source: 2035 General Plan; “Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, Dune Palms Specific Plan,” CRM TECH, October 13, 2008; City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; AB 52 and SB 18 response letters to the City from the Native American Heritage Commission and Native American tribes, June through October 2018. Setting The Coachella Valley has a rich history of Native American settlement. The Cahuilla people, a Takic-speaking people of hunters and gatherers, occupied villages in the San Gorgonio Pass-Palm Springs area, the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains, and the eastern Coachella Valley. Most of the cultural resources in the City of La Quinta developed in and around ancient Lake Cahuilla. The oldest cultural resources have been identified in the western portion of the City and date to about 2,700 years ago. The completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad line in the 1870s began an influx of Non- Indian settlers in the Coachella Valley. Public land in the valley was opened for private land claims in the 1880s. At the turn of the 20th century, the first land was claimed in the La Quinta area. By the 1910s and 1920s, a number of ranches and hotels were operating in the La Quinta area. Historic resources in La Quinta include buildings and homes, some of which are older than 80 years. Portions of the City contain paleontological resources (i.e. freshwater shells and fossils) due to the presence of ancient Lake Cahuilla, which receded for the last time around A.D. 1680. In 2008, a cultural resources survey was conducted on the subject property in conjunction with the proposed (now approved) Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan. No “historic resources” were found onsite; however, the project vicinity is known to be highly sensitive for prehistoric resources. A sacred lands record search identified no Native American cultural resources in the project vicinity. However, the Torres Martinez Desert 225 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -28- Cahuilla Indians recommended that a cultural resource monitor be onsite during any ground-disturbing activities, and that proper procedures be followed if cultural resources were found. The cultural resources report recommended these and other archaeological monitoring measures pertaining to the curation and analysis of any unearthed artifacts. Beginning in June 2018, in conjunction with the proposed project, the City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and initiated the AB 52 and SB 18 consultation processes with Native American tribes that have cultural and traditional affiliation to the project area. See V.b, below. Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The proposed project will not affect a historical resource because none are located onsite. A cultural resources survey conducted on the subject property in 2008 found no historic resources onsite. The survey noted that a mobile home park was once located on the eastern portion of the property, but it has since been removed, and no remnants were known to be more than 50 years old. No historic sites listed on the La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database are located on the subject property. No impact will occur. b) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will result in grading and other ground-surface disturbances of the northern 10± acres of the Specific Plan site that could potentially disturb previously unknown resources. The ground surface of the eastern portion of this area was previously disturbed by development of a mobile home park, which has been since removed. 2008 Cultural Resources Survey The entire Specific Plan site was surveyed for cultural resources in 2008, and no archaeological resources were identified. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and representatives of 14 regional tribes were contacted to inquire about potential cultural resources within or near the project area. The NAHC reported no Native American cultural resources in the project area. The Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians recommended that a cultural resource monitor be present onsite during ground-disturbing activities, that proper procedures be followed in the event human remains are discovered, and that project-related cultural resource documentation be forwarded to the tribe. The 2008 records search showed that more than 100 archaeological sites and isolates (localities with fewer than three artifacts) were previously recorded outside the project boundaries within a one-mile radius of the subject property. Therefore, the broader project area demonstrates a high sensitivity for potentially significant prehistoric archaeological remains in buried deposits. Future grading, excavation, and other ground-disturbing development activities on the subject property have the potential to unearth archaeological resources. 226 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -29- 2018 Tribal Consultation Beginning in June 2018, the City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) regarding the proposed project, initiated the AB 52 consultation process with Native American tribes having cultural and traditional affiliation to the project area, and initiated the SB 18 consultation process with tribes having traditional lands or cultural places within the General Plan boundaries. The City sent a total of 51 letters to tribal representatives and received 9 written responses. None indicated any knowledge of cultural resources on the Specific Plan site. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians stated the Specific Plan area is outside the Tribe’s reservation but within its Traditional Use Area; it requested the presence of a tribal monitor and qualified archaeologist during ground disturbing activities, proper notifications and procedures in the event buried cultural deposits are encountered, and copies of cultural resources documentation generated in conjunction with the project. The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians encouraged contacting other tribes and using a qualified construction monitor; it also requested to be contacted if cultural resources are discovered during project development. The Pala Band of Mission Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians, and San Manuel Band of Mission Indians stated the project site is outside their reservations and/or ancestral territorial boundaries and deferred to other tribes in closer proximity. The Quechan Indian Tribe indicated it had no comment on the project. The Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians stated the site has little cultural significance or ties to the tribe but requested to be informed of any inadvertent discoveries. Summary Although no archaeological resources are known to occur onsite, the surrounding area has a high sensitivity for them. Future development of the Specific Plan area will result in ground disturbing activities that could potentially unearth archaeological resources. Mitigation measure CUL-1 and a monitoring program are included below to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels, consistent with the findings of the cultural resource investigation and tribal concerns. With implementation of this measure, impacts to archaeological resources will be reduced to less than significant levels. c) No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to impact unique paleontological or geologic features because none are known to occur onsite. The Specific Plan area lies approximately 13 to 18 feet higher than the highest shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla (Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, Dune Palms Specific Plan,” CRM TECH, October 13, 2008). Onsite sandy soils are recently deposited and, therefore, have a low potential for paleontological resources (General Plan Exhibit III-5 and page III-50). Soils on the easterly portion of the site were previously disturbed by development of a mobile home park. No impact will occur. d) No Impact. The proposed project is not expected to impact human remains or cemeteries because none are known to occur onsite. California law requires that contractors immediately notify law enforcement officials should human remains be identified. This requirement assures that there will be no impact to human remains. 227 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -30- Mitigation Measures: CUL-1: The project site shall be monitored during on- and off-site grubbing, trenching, and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors, including a Native American monitor. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the City prior to issuance of the first earth-moving or clearing permit. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment upon the discovery of cultural resources to allow for City notification and analysis. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long-term curation in polyethylene self-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid-free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: CUL-A Native American Monitoring agreements shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities on the site. The agreements shall be preserved in the Planning Division files for the project. Responsible Party: Planning Division 228 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -31- VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X Sources: 2035 General Plan; “Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area,” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1980; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; “Land Subsidence, Groundwater Levels, and Geology in the Coachella Valley, California, 1993- 2010,” USGS, Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5075; City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #09-03. 229 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -32- Setting The Coachella Valley is located in the northwestern portion of the Salton Trough, a tectonic depression roughly 130 miles long and 70 miles wide that extends from the San Gorgonio Pass to the Gulf of Mexico. The valley is bounded by the San Bernardino Mountains on the northwest, San Jacinto Mountains on the west, Santa Rosa Mountains on the south, and Little San Bernardino Mountains and Indio Hills on the north. The Salton Sea lies to the southeast. The valley’s geologic composition is directly related to its proximity to the San Andreas Fault, which passes through the northeasterly portion of the valley, and other active faults. The region is susceptible to a range of geologic hazards, including ground rupture, major ground shaking, slope instability, and collapsible and expansive soils. Episodic flooding of major regional drainages, including the Whitewater River, results in the deposition of sand and gravel on the valley floor. Strong sustained winds emanating from the San Gorgonio Pass cause wind erosion and transport and deposit dry, finely granulated, sandy soils on the central valley floor. Discussion of Impacts a) i. No Impact. The project will not result in impacts associated with fault rupture because the subject property is not located within or adjacent to an Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The nearest earthquake fault is the San Andreas Fault, approximately 6 miles northeast of the site (General Plan Exhibit IV-2). ii. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will result in less than significant impacts associated with seismic ground shaking. The project site is in a seismically active region where earthquakes originating on local and regional seismic faults can produce severe ground shaking. Buildings proposed for the site will be required to be constructed in accordance with the most recent edition of the California Building Code (CBC) and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 8.16.010 (Adoption of the California Existing Building Code) to provide collapse-resistant design. The City has adopted several modifications to the CBC based on local geology. These requirements are designed to minimize impacts to people and property in the event of an earthquake. Project-related impacts will be less than significant. iii. No Impact. The proposed project will not result in impacts associated with seismic ground failure. The project site is not susceptible to liquefaction (General Plan Exhibit IV-3). No impact will occur. iv. No Impact. The proposed project will not result in impacts associated with landslides. The project site is on the low-lying valley floor. It consists of and is surrounded by relatively flat terrain. The nearest hillsides and mountainous slopes are approximately one mile to the west. No impacts associated with landslides will occur. 230 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -33- b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts associated with erosion because although the valley floor on which the subject property is located is highly susceptible to wind erosion (General Plan Exhibit IV-5), standard requirements imposed by the City will reduce the potential impacts to less than significant levels. Build out of the project area will result in grading, excavation, construction, and other surface and subsurface disturbances on the northern undeveloped portion of the Specific Plan that could result in the loss of topsoil and generate particulate matter. Grading and construction will result in removal of the topsoil; however, future development projects will be required to implement measures to control fugitive dust (See Section III, Air Quality), which will minimize potential adverse impacts associated with soil erosion. Water erosion could also occur from site watering and rainfall during the development process and post-construction operations. The project will be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) and Best Management Practices (BMP) set forth in project-specific Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) to assure that water erosion is reduced to less than significant levels. Post-construction water runoff will be managed in accordance with project-specific approvals. Impacts will be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts associated with unstable soils. The site is not susceptible to on- or off-site landslide, liquefaction, or lateral spreading due to the composition of soils and distance from mountainous slopes and foothills (General Plan Exhibit IV-3). The U.S. Geological Survey and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) have measured land surface subsidence that is believed to be associated with declining groundwater levels in parts of the Coachella Valley, including central and southern La Quinta (Figure 8, “Land Subsidence, Groundwater Levels, and Geology in the Coachella Valley, California, 1993-2010,” USGS, 2014). The Specific Plan site is located within the northern boundary of the subsidence area. A number of measures, including regional-scale groundwater recharge and water conservation programs, have been implemented by CVWD and other agencies to slow or reverse subsidence. Soils that are susceptible to subsidence may also be susceptible to collapse; the subject site is within an area identified by the City as having potentially high settlement and collapsible soils (City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #09-03). Future development will include hotel, retail commercial and/or mixed-use projects. All grading, excavation, and construction will be conducted in compliance with City standards. The City will require additional project-specific geotechnical and structural engineering analysis, as necessary, to determine whether soil remediation, over-excavation or compaction is required. The City’s Engineering Bulletin #09-03, which provides supplemental guidance with respect to collapsible soils for geotechnical reports that require City approval, will be applicable to future onsite projects. Applicable requirements will be imposed by the City prior to issuance of grading permits and will assure that impacts associated with soils remain less than significant. 231 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -34- d) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in impacts associated with expansive soils. The site’s underlying soils consist of Myoma fine sand (MaD) and Coachella fine sand (CpA), which have a low shrink-swell potential (“Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area,” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1980). No impact will occur. e) No Impact. Future development associated with the proposed project will connect to the existing sewer system. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems will be installed. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 232 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -35- VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Source: 2035 General Plan; California Global Warming Solutions Act; CalEEMod version 2016.3.2; La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (2012). Setting The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), and water vapor (H2O). Some GHGs, such as CO2, CH4, and N2O, occur naturally and are emitted into the atmosphere through natural processes and human activities. CO2 and CH4 are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. Emissions of CO2 are largely byproducts of fossil fuel combustion, whereas CH4 results mostly from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Man- made GHGs, which have a much greater heat-absorption potential than CO2, include fluorinated gases, such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), which are associated with certain industrial products and processes. Greenhouse gas emissions are generated by both moving and stationary sources, including vehicles, the production of electricity and natural gas, water pumping, and fertilizers. State law mandates that all cities decrease their greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. In June 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California’s GHG emissions reduction targets in Executive Order S-3-05. The Executive Order established the following goals: GHG emissions should be reduced to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions should be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions should be reduced to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. In furtherance of the goals established in Executive Order S-3-05, the legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which the governor signed in 2006. In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown issued an Executive Order which identified an interim GHG reduction target in support of targets previously identified under S-3-05 and AB 32. Executive Order B-30-15 set an interim target goal of reducing GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. 233 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -36- La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan In 2012, the City of La Quinta prepared a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan with its General Plan to set greenhouse reduction goals. The plan includes a comprehensive inventory of greenhouse gas emissions generated City-wide along with future greenhouse emission projections, reduction targets, and policies and programs. To meet AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05 goals, the City’s reduction target is to achieve 1990 level emissions by 2020, and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. The City will also comply with statewide efforts and act locally to monitor, evaluate, and amend local policies and programs to achieve mandated emission reductions. GHG Thresholds In 2009, during SCAQMD GHG working group meetings, SCAQMD staff proposed a variety of thresholds for GHG emissions. However, as of 2018, the SCAQMD Governing Board has not formally adopted the proposed interim tiered approach for evaluating GHG impacts. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD formally adopted a greenhouse gas significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr that only applies to stationary sources for industrial uses where SCAQMD is the lead agency (SCAQMD Resolution No. 08-35). This threshold was adopted based upon an October 2008 staff report and draft interim guidance document1 that also recommended a threshold for all projects using a tiered approach. It was recommended by SCAQMD staff that a project’s GHG emissions would be considered significant if it could not comply with at least one of the following “tiered” tests: • Tier 1: Is there an applicable exemption? • Tier 2: Is the project compliant with a greenhouse gas reduction plan that is, at a minimum, consistent with the goals of AB 32? • Tier 3: Is the project below an absolute threshold (10,000 MTCO2e/yr for industrial projects; 3,000 MTCO2e/yr for residential and commercial projects)? • Tier 4: Is the project below a (yet to be set) performance threshold? • Tier 5: Would the project achieve a screening level with off-site mitigation? The project would generate GHG emissions during construction and operation. Construction-related GHG emissions will be temporary and will end once the project is completed. Operational emissions will occur throughout the life of the project. At build out, five emission source categories will contribute either directly or indirectly to operational GHG emissions: energy/electricity usage, water usage, solid waste disposal, area emissions (pavement and architectural coating off-gassing), and mobile sources. 1 Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, prepared by SCAQMD, October 2008. 234 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -37- The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 was used to quantify potential greenhouse gas emissions (see Appendix A). As shown in the following table, they will exceed the Tier 3 threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr for residential and commercial projects. The project is not subject to an applicable exemption (Tier 1), will not be below a performance threshold (Tier 4), and will not achieve a screening level with off-site mitigation (Tier 5). It will, however, be regulated by the City’s GHG Reduction Plan (Tier 2), described below, and required as mitigation measure AQ-2, above. Therefore, with the implementation of the City’s GHG Reduction Plan, impacts would be less than significant. Table 4 Projected GHG Emissions Summary (Metric Tons) Phase CO2e (MT/ YR) Construction 850.32 Operational 13,887.92 SCAQMD Threshold (Commercial) 3,000.00 Source: CalEEMod version 2016.3.2 As shown in Table 4, the proposed project’s GHG emissions will be highest during the operational phase. CalEEMod indicates that operational emissions are largely due to the number of vehicle trips generated by the project. As explained in the City’s GHG Reduction Plan, transportation is by far the largest emitter of GHGs, and GHG reductions will come over time from improvements in fuel efficiency and clean car standards. The Specific Plan area is well-situated along Highway 111 to benefit from alternative modes of transportation; sidewalks, bike lanes, and SunLine bus stops are in the immediate project area and could reduce the number of project-generated vehicle trips. The project proposes mixed-use development with residential development, retail, and employment centers in proximity to one another. Mixed- use development is a “smart growth” policy that can be effective in reducing dependence on personal motor vehicles and reducing GHG emissions from the transportation sector. As projects are proposed within the Specific Plan area, mitigation measure AQ-2 will be implemented, and the project will be required to demonstrate compliance with the Plan. This mitigation measure will assure that impacts associated with GHG emissions are reduced to less than significant levels. b) Less Than Significant Impact. It is recognized that GHG impacts are intrinsically cumulative, and the proposed project will contribute to regional GHG emissions. However, it would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for the purposes of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. All components of construction, including equipment, fuels, materials, and management practices, would be subject to current and future SCAQMD rules and regulations related to greenhouse gases. Applicable SCAQMD rules include, but are not limited to, source- 235 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -38- specific standards that reduce GHG content in engines and limit equipment idling durations. In addition, the project will be subject to requirements set forth in the La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and the City’s Municipal Code Section 9.100.220 (Operational Standards), which is qualitatively consistent with Statewide goals and policies in place for the reduction of GHG emissions. Mitigation Measures: See Air Quality, above. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: See Air Quality, above. 236 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -39- VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Source: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste; State Water Resources Control Board; “Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan,” Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, October 14, 2004. “Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, South Side of Highway 111 and East of Dune Palms Road,” Earth 237 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -40- Systems Southwest, June 20, 2006; “Report of Phase II Investigation, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 600-020-004 and -005, Highway 111 and East of Dune Palms Road,” Earth Systems Southwest, February 7, 2007. Setting In the City of La Quinta, hazardous materials transport, storage, and use is strictly regulated for large quantity users, such as industrial processing plants and commercial dry cleaners. The City implements the General Plan’s Hazardous and Toxic Materials Element through regular consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. The City also monitors and regulates industrial plants and commercial areas through the Element’s goals, policies, and programs. Discussion of Impacts a, b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts associated with routine use of hazardous materials. The project will facilitate commercial and/or mixed-use development on the Specific Plan site. Standard cleaners, solvents, fertilizers, and pesticides may be stored and used on- site for routine cleaning and landscaping. However, none of these will be used in quantities that pose a threat to humans or cause a foreseeable chemical release into the environment. The proposed hotel site plan includes an outdoor pool; chemicals required for pool maintenance would be stored and used onsite. As with cleaning products, these pool chemicals will not be stored or used in sufficient quantities to pose a threat to visitors or employees at the site. The construction phase would involve the use of heavy equipment that uses limited quantities of oil and fuels and other potential flammable substances, and onsite refueling and minor maintenance could potentially result in fuel and oil spills. Contractors will be required to identify a staging area for storing materials and will be subject to State law relating to the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials during construction. The use and handling of hazardous materials during construction and long-term operation of future development would be required to comply with applicable federal, State, and local laws, including California Occupational Health and Safety Administration (CalOSHA) requirements. With the implementation of City, County and State requirements and laws, impacts will be less than significant. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in impacts to schools because no existing or proposed schools are within ¼-mile of the Specific Plan area. d) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in impacts associated with a hazardous site because the subject property is not included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. It is not identified as a cleanup site, permitted facility, or other site on the State Water Resources Control Board’s GeoTracker database. It is not identified for cleanup, permitting, enforcement, or investigation on the Department of Toxic Substances Control Envirostor database. 238 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -41- Future development facilitated by the proposed Specific Plan amendment will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment. In 2006 and 2007, Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments were conducted on the Specific Plan site. A geophysical survey was conducted to look for underground storage tanks (USTs) that could have stored gasoline and/or diesel fuel when the site contained a mobile home park. Soil samples were analyzed for the presence of pesticides. No USTs were found, and pesticide concentrations were not of concern. No further investigation or remediation was warranted. e, f) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in airport safety hazards for people residing or working in the project area. The Specific Plan area is located approximately 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport and is outside the boundaries of the airport’s Land Use Compatibility Plan. The site is not located near a private airstrip. g) No Impact. The proposed project will not alter existing circulation patterns or evacuation plans in the project area. Primary transportation access will be taken from Highway 111, which is part of the established street network. Future parking and circulation plans will be reviewed by the Fire and Police Departments to assure that driveways are adequate for emergency vehicles. These standard requirements will assure that there will be no project-related impacts to emergency response. h) No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to significant risks associated with wildfires. The subject property is in an urban area and surrounded by development on all sides. The nearest wildlands are the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains, approximately one mile to the west. The project site is not located in a wildland fire hazard zone and is not susceptible to wildfires. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 239 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -42- IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X 240 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -43- IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Source: 2035 General Plan; FEMA Flood Insurance Rate FIRM Panel No. 06065C2234G; “Preliminary Hydrology/Hydraulics Report, City of La Quinta, Dune Palms/Hwy 111 Project,” MSA Consulting, Inc., October 14, 2008; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; Coachella Valley Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Setting Domestic Water The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides domestic water and irrigation water to the City, including the project site. Its primary source of water is groundwater extracted by deep wells from the Whitewater River sub-basin. The water resource consists of a combination of natural runoff, recycled water, imported water, inflows from adjacent basins, and an interlinked system of sub-basins. The Whitewater River sub-basin is also artificially recharged through imported State Water Project Exchange and Colorado River water. There are three recharge facilities in the Valley: one northwest of Palm Springs, one southeast of La Quinta in Martinez Canyon, and one in La Quinta south of Avenue 58 and west of Madison Street. The total storage capacity of the Whitewater River Subbasin is approximately 28.8 million acre-feet and it currently contains approximately 25 million acre-feet. It is capable of meeting the water demands of the Coachella Valley, including the City, for extended normal and drought periods. CVWD’s domestic water system includes 50 wells with an average depth of 900 feet to serve the City and its wider customer base. CVWD has a total of 27 reservoirs with an average capacity of 1.8 million gallons. Wastewater CVWD also provides wastewater collection and treatment services to La Quinta. CVWD has two wastewater treatment plants serving the City, but only one of the plants (which serve the area north of Miles Avenue) currently has the ability to generate tertiary treated water. It has a capacity of 2.5 million gallons per day. Reclaimed water can be used only for irrigation. CVWD continually increases the capacity of its wastewater reclamation facilities by constructing new treatment and aeration ponds, and other structures. CVWD implements all requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board pertaining to water quality and wastewater discharge. 241 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -44- Flood Control The Coachella Valley has an average rainfall of 3 inches per year. Several watersheds drain the elevated terrain of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains toward the valley floor. The region is subject to short duration rainfall events which can generate significant amounts of surface water. To control the surface runoff during storm events, approximately 6% of open space lands are dedicated for purpose of flood control. These areas are connected to a regional conveyance system within the City, which is managed by the CVWD and includes the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (Whitewater River), La Quinta Evacuation Channel, All-American Canal, Upper Bear Creek Drainage System, Lake Cahuilla Reservoir, and East La Quinta Channel. Furthermore, the City requires that all development projects contain and control stormwater that flows through a developed site, generally through the installation of retention basins. The Specific Plan site and areas surrounding it are subject to City requirements relating to flood control. The City implements standard requirements for the retention of storm flows and participates in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to protect surface waters from pollution. Development projects must retain 100-year storm flow on site. Surface Water Quality The water quality of regional surface waters is largely dependent upon land uses that affect runoff, such as agriculture, urban development, and industrial land uses. Runoff from storm water and agricultural irrigation can transport pollutants that collect on the ground surface and affect water quality of receiving streams, rivers, and channels. In La Quinta, the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel and La Quinta Evacuation Channel are the major receiving water bodies; they drain into the Salton Sea. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts to water quality. The project site is located in the Whitewater River watershed. All water providers in the watershed are required to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board standards for the protection of water quality, including the preparation of site-specific Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) for surface waters. The CVWD is required to meet water quality requirements in the production and delivery of domestic water. The CVWD is regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and must maintain strict water quality standards in the treatment of effluent. Future onsite development projects will be required to connect to existing domestic water and wastewater systems. Construction of extension lines will be subject to all CVWD requirements. Development projects will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. They will be required to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations, which minimize the pollutant load associated with urban runoff. The imposition of conditions of approval, 242 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -45- local, state and federal standard requirements and the requirements of law will assure that development will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts are expected to be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. Future onsite development projects will require water for domestic use and landscape irrigation. Projected water demand is shown in Table 5. Table 5 Projected Water Demand Land Use Build Out Conditions Demand Factor Projected Annual Demand Commercial (retail) 305,000 sq. ft. 0.11 gallons/sq. ft./day1 12,245,750 gallons (37.6 acre-feet) Commercial (hotel) 108 rooms 150 gallons/room/day2 5,913,000 gallons (18.1 acre-feet) Residential 140 MF units, or 369 residents* 107 gallons/capita/day3 14,411,295 gallons (44.2 acre-feet) Total: 32,570,045 gallons (100.0 acre-feet) * 140 dwelling units x 2.63 persons per household (CA Dept. of Finance, 2018) = 369 residents 1 American Water Works Association Research Foundation 2 Estimate based on similar regional hotel development projects 3 p.4-4, CVWD 2015 Urban Water Management Plan The proposed project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater replenishment programs. Impacts will be less than significant. As noted in the Setting discussion above, the Whitewater River Subbasin currently contains approximately 25 million acre-feet. Build out of the proposed project is projected to use 100.0 acre-feet annually. The project is consistent with the land use designations of the General Plan. CVWD works with the City of La Quinta and all other jurisdictions and regularly updates its Urban Water Management Plan. According to the CVWD’s latest Urban Water Management Plan (2015), the City of La Quinta, including the subject site, was considered in its future water demand projections and analysis, which found that the CVWD has sufficient supply to accommodate growth now and in the future, with the implementation of a number of conservation strategies. The project will connect to existing water lines beneath Highway 111. No new wells or additional water infrastructure are proposed. The project will be required to comply with the City’s water-efficiency requirements, including the use of drought- tolerant planting materials and limited landscaping irrigation. Implementation of these and other applicable requirements will assure that water-related impacts remain at less than significant levels. 243 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -46- c, d, e) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts from stormwater drainage and runoff. 2008 Specific Plan Hydrology Report A “Preliminary Hydrology/Hydraulics Report” was prepared in 2008 in conjunction with the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan (MSA Consulting, Inc., October 14, 2008). Two flood control alternatives were analyzed. Under Alternative 1, storm runoff would be conveyed to onsite streets, then to underground storm drain lines and a NPDES treatment facility, before entering the CVWD La Quinta Evacuation Channel south of the site. The storm drain system would also capture runoff from the mini-storage facility to the west and the Desert Sands Unified School District facility to the south. Under Alternative 2, onsite stormwater runoff would be conveyed to streets and carried via underground storm drains to onsite underground retention storage units. The study concluded that both alternatives could adequately manage 100-year storm flows. The City also required preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The WQMP determined that, with implementation of proposed site design concepts and hydrological improvements, the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour rainfall events would result in runoff conditions that will not deviate from pre-project conditions. Existing Conditions The southern portion of the Specific Plan site is developed with multi-family housing; stormwater is managed consistent with Alternative 1, described above, and flows are conveyed to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The undeveloped northern portion of the site is relatively flat, slopes toward the south and east, and contain no rivers or streams. Storm flows are generally characterized as sheet flow. Proposed Stormwater Management The proposed 108-room hotel (Exhibit 5) would occupy 3± acres at the northeasterly corner of the Specific Plan area. Its stormwater management system will connect to existing drains at the Coral Mountain Apartments, and drainage will be discharged into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The existing drainage outfall was designed to carry all future flows from the Specific Plan area; no additional infrastructure will be required. The stormwater management needs of other onsite development projects will be evaluated on a project-by-project basis as proposals are submitted. All projects will be required to comply with the City’s requirements as they relate to storm water retention, including the approval of a final project-specific hydrology study and Water Quality Management Plan. Implementation of these and other applicable requirements will assure that drainage and stormwater will not create or contribute water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. 244 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -47- f) No Impact. The proposed project will not substantially degrade water quality. Project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMPs) will be required for the hotel and all future development proposals. Projects will be required to comply with all applicable water quality standards and implement a WQMP approved by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Adherence to the City’s standard requirements related to water quality will ensure there will be no impact to water quality. g, h) No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to 100-year flood hazards because the Specific Plan site is not within the 100-year floodplain. According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the northern portion of the Specific Plan site, which is vacant and available for future development, is within two flood zones. The majority is in Zone X (shaded), an area of moderate flood hazard, usually the area between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year floods. Approximately one acre at the southwest corner is in Zone X (unshaded), an area of minimal flood hazard outside the 500-year flood. i, j) No Impact. The proposed project will not expose people or structures to flooding risks from a levee, dam, seiche, tsunami, or mudflow because the subject site is not located near a body of water. There will be no impact. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 245 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -48- X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Sources: 2035 General Plan; Zoning Map; “City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Study,” ULI Technical Assistance Panel, July 23, 2018; Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 2007. Setting The project site is governed by the policies and land use designations of the La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Currently, the project area is designated as General Commercial and Regional Commercial (CR) in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Maps, respectively. The project site is also governed by the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan, which provides site-specific design standards and guidelines to guide development on the site. The project proposes an amendment to the Specific Plan, as described below. The City of La Quinta participates in the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP), as discussed under Section IV, Biological Resources. Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The proposed project will not physically divide an established community. The subject property is vacant, and adjacent to Highway 111, the City’s principal commercial corridor. It is surrounded by commercial, residential, office, and institutional development. The southern portion of the property is developed with the Coral Mountain apartment complex, which has direct access to Dune Palms Road and the Komar/Costco center via Vista Coralina Lane. No impact will occur. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have less than significant impacts on applicable land use plans and policies. It would revise the Specific Plan’s commercial development standards as described below. The Specific Plan area is designated as General Commercial in the General Plan and Regional Commercial (CR) on the Zoning Map. Development is governed by the Highway 111 246 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -49- and Dune Palms Specific Plan (SP 08-085). The southerly portion of the site is developed with the Coral Mountain apartment complex. The proposed Specific Plan amendment would allow commercial and/or mixed-use development (commercial and residential) on the northerly portion, to include up to: • 108-room business hotel, • 305,000 square feet of retail use, and • 140 units of multi-family housing. A Site Development Permit will be required for approval of the landscaping and architectural design of the hotel component of the project, and for future project(s) on the remaining 7 acres of the project area. The Specific Plan Amendment also proposes the following revisions to the commercial development standards set forth in Section 3.2.2 of the Specific Plan: 1. Removal of maximum commercial building square footage of 82,000 square feet gross floor area. 2. The maximum height shall be 60 feet throughout the commercial area, including within the first 150 feet from the Highway 111 right-of-way. Proposed land uses and development intensities are consistent with the General Plan vision for the Highway 111 corridor, and the recently completed Highway 111 Corridor Study. The study identifies the Specific Plan site as an ideal location for a Hospitality and Mixed Use District with a hotel, mixed use development, and housing that would support existing and future retail uses. The site is currently designated General Commercial (CG) in the General Plan and is zoned for Regional Commercial (CR). Therefore, the proposed amendment would not require a General Plan Amendment or Zone Change. The project would increase the development potential on the northerly portion of the site and allow building heights up to 60 feet, including up to the Highway 111 right-of-way. Highway 111 forms the northerly Specific Plan boundary and is designated an Image Corridor in the City’s 2035 General Plan (General Plan Exhibit II-4). The Municipal Code restricts building heights within 150 feet of an Image Corridor. However, the proposed project would result in mixed-use development, and proposed building heights of 60 feet are consistent with Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, which permits maximum building heights of 60 feet in Mixed Use districts with an underlying Regional Commercial (CR) zone. Varied building heights, higher intensity development, and flexible development standards are also envisioned along Highway 111 in the Highway 111 Corridor Study. The proposed development intensities and standards are consistent with the City’s vision for this parcel and will not alter or change the City’s development standards on other sites. They will not result in the construction of substandard structures. Proposed land uses are consistent with land uses allowed in the Specific Plan, those recommended in the Highway 111 Corridor Study, and the existing Coral Mountain Apartments onsite. Given the relatively small size of the site (10± acres) and its 247 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -50- location in the heart of the City’s urban core, the impact of the proposed Specific Plan amendments on applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations will be less than significant. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. As stated in Section IV, Biological Resources, the project site is within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV MSHCP) boundaries but is not located within or adjacent to a CV MSHCP-designated Conservation Area. Future development projects will be required to pay standard mitigation fees at the issuance of building permits. No conflict will occur. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 248 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -51- XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Sources: 2035 General Plan. Setting Mineral resources in the City consist primarily of sand and gravel which has been transported by wind and rain into the Valley from surrounding mountains over millennia. The City is composed of seven soil units: alluvial sand and gravel of the Whitewater River (Qg), windblown sand (Qs), interbedded lacustrine (Ql), alluvial deposits (Qa), alluvial fan sand and gravel deposits (Qf), landslide deposits (Qls), and quartz diorite (Qd) (General Plan; Exhibit IV-4). Sand and gravels are considered an economic resource and commonly used for road base and other building materials. Only one area of the City is identified as having the potential for mineral resources, the Quarry. However, the Quarry has been developed as a country club for several years. No existing sand or gravel operations occur in the vicinity of the project site. Discussion of Impacts a, b) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a mineral resource because the Specific Plan site is not known to contain mineral resources. The site is designated as Mineral Resource Zone MRZ-1, “areas where available geologic information indicates that little likelihood exists for the presence of significant mineral resources” (General Plan Exhibit III-1). The southern portion of the Specific Plan area is developed with the Coral Mountain Apartments, parking lots, and other improvements. The northern portion of the project site is composed of Myoma fine sand (MaD) and Coachella fine sand (CpA) which are not considered a source of valuable mineral resources for the City or region. The project site and surrounding parcels are designated for commercial, residential, office, and other urban uses, not for mineral production. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 249 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -52- XII. NOISE: Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Source: 2035 General Plan; “Dune Palms/Hw-111 Development Noise Analysis,” Urban Crossroads, November 5, 2009 (revised). Setting According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the main sources of noise include road traffic, aircraft, railroads, construction, industry, noise in buildings, and consumer products (EPA Clean Air Act Title IV - Noise Pollution). In an urban setting, the primary sources of traffic noise are motors and exhaust systems of autos, trucks, buses, and motorcycles (Noise and Its Effects, Administrative Conference of the United States). Stationary noise sources include pool and spa equipment and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units. Noise can also come from the stationary operations of transport, such as railroad yards and truck depots used for loading and unloading. Temporary noise sources include landscape maintenance activities, home stereo systems, and barking dogs. 250 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -53- The City has the authority to set land use noise standards and place restrictions on private activities that generate excessive or intrusive noise. Noise generators are subject to the City’s noise ordinance. The City has also established goals, policies, and programs to limit and reduce the effects of noise intrusion on sensitive land uses and to set acceptable noise levels for varying types of land uses. Noise-sensitive land uses include those uses where noise exposure could result in health-related risks to individuals and places where quiet is an essential element of the intended purpose. They include residential dwellings, hospitals, schools, places of worship, hotels, libraries, and other places where low interior noise levels are essential. The project site is adjacent to Highway 111, an extended retail corridor that serves local and regional traffic and provides access to numerous adjoining arterial roadways, businesses, neighborhoods, and institutions. As such, noise levels on Highway 111 can be expected to be greater than those of local streets. The Specific Plan area is surrounded by urban development, including commercial, office, and mini-storage buildings to the east, west, and northeast, and a school bus parking and maintenance facility to the south. The southern portion of the subject site contains the Coral Mountain apartment complex; as a residential facility, it is considered a sensitive receptor under the City’s noise standards. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 2008 Noise Study In 2008, a noise study was prepared to analyze the potential impacts of build out of the (then-proposed) Specific Plan area, including 200 multi-family residences on the southern portion of the site and auto-related commercial uses on the northern portion. Existing (vacant site) noise level measurements were taken at 4 locations; long-term ambient noise levels ranged between 54.9 and 58.6 dBA CNEL, and short- term ambient noise levels ranged between 46.7 and 55.8 dBA Leq. The highest noise levels occurred in the morning hours generally between 5 a.m. to 8 a.m. due to street traffic and operation of the school bus lot. Noise levels along most roadway segments exceeded the General Plan’s 65 dBA baseline compatibility standard at 100 feet from the centerline. The traffic study determined that future traffic generated by the (then-proposed) Specific Plan would increase traffic noise levels in the project area by less than the threshold of 3.0 dBA, and therefore, traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. However, noise from the school bus facility south of the Specific Plan area would adversely impact residences proposed in the southern portion of the site, and mitigation measures were set forth to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Proposed Project Since the 2008 noise analysis was prepared, the Coral Mountain Apartments were developed on the southern portion of the project area. Due to distance and the intervening apartment complex, noise generated at the school bus lot is not a 251 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -54- concern at the subject site. The main noise source affecting the northern portion of the project site is vehicular traffic on Highway 111. Vehicles accessing the Coral Mountain Apartments and commercial development on adjacent properties also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the noise environment. Without mitigation, the proposed project could potentially expose people residing onsite to noise levels that exceed City standards. Residential units and hotels are considered “sensitive receptors” because they are more sensitive to noise impacts. The maximum acceptable noise level for multi-family residences and hotels is 65 dBA CNEL (General Plan Table IV-3). At General Plan buildout (year 2035), on Highway 111 east of Dune Palms Road (immediate Specific Plan vicinity), the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour is projected to extend 481 feet from the Highway 111 centerline (General Plan Table IV-4). The vacant northern portion of the project site extends approximately 600 feet from Highway 111, so most future residential and hotel development will be exposed to maximum acceptable noise levels. Commercial development is not considered a sensitive receptor, and noise levels generated by Highway 111 are considered acceptable. Future development proposals will be required to conduct project-specific noise analysis to evaluate project impacts and determine effective mitigation measures, if needed. Site planning techniques can also be used to reduce interior noise levels. The hotel would be bounded by Highway 111 on the north and commercial development on the east. It is oriented such that the exposure of rooms and windows to Highway 111 would be minimized. Future residential projects would also need to consider implementation of site planning strategies that minimize noise impacts, such as open space setbacks, building orientation, installation of noise barriers (berms and masonry walls), and insulation. Impacts will be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts from ground-borne vibration and/or noise. The site is relatively flat and comprised of sandy soils. No blasting or ripping of bedrock is anticipated. Development of the proposed hotel and future projects will require the use of heavy machinery during the construction phase that could generate detectable vibrations. Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to affected structures, and soil type. It is expected that ground-borne vibration would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion and would end once construction is complete. Construction hours will be restricted to the less sensitive daytime hours, and future residential units would likely be constructed at the same time as commercial projects, and would not be occupied until completion. In addition, the mitigation measures provided to address construction noise impacts, including measure NOI-2 and NOI-3, will assure that vibration associated with construction equipment and vehicles will be reduced. Overall impacts are expected to be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant permanent increases in ambient noise levels above levels without the project. The northern portion of the project site is currently vacant and produces no 252 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -55- noise. Future onsite development projects would increase noise from traffic, HVAC units, grounds maintenance equipment, and other noises associated with daily commercial and residential operations. Noise levels will be required to comply with Section 9.100.210 of the City’s Municipal Code, which governs noise levels in the city. Current noise standards allow noise levels of 65 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., and 50 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. for noise sensitive uses; 75 dBA from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., and 65 dBA from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. for non-residential uses. Proposed land uses are consistent with existing development on adjacent parcels and along the Highway 111 corridor. The retail and residential development proposed as part of the project will not generate noise increases that would result in significant impacts to off-site receptors. Impacts will be less than significant. d) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. During construction, the proposed project would result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels above levels without the project. Construction equipment would include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that can reach high noise levels. Temporary noise generated during the construction phase of the proposed project could exceed acceptable noise levels. The City will require that construction activity comply with Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code, which limits construction activity to between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Saturdays between October 1 and April 30. Construction hours are from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays from May 1 to September 30. No activity is permitted on Sundays and holidays. Construction equipment could impact the apartment units to the south, however, the distance provided by the intervening street, and mitigation measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 will reduce the potential for construction noise impacts. Compliance with the Municipal Code and implementation of the mitigation measures listed below will reduce potential construction noise impacts to less than significant levels. e, f) No Impact. The subject property is located approximately 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport and outside the boundaries of the airport’s Land Use Compatibility Plan. The site is not located near a private airstrip. The project will not expose people living or working in the area to excessive noise levels. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1 Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays. The Project construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the note, and the City shall conduct periodic inspection at its discretion. 253 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -56- NOI-2 All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. NOI-3 All equipment staging shall be placed in areas that create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the project site during all project construction (i.e., to the center). NOI-4 Construction haul truck deliveries shall be limited to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sunday). The contractor shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck-related noise. NOI-5 Prior to obtaining building permits and once precise grading plans, architectural plans, and building designs are complete, a final noise study that specifies interior noise reduction requirements shall be prepared for each future onsite development project, including the proposed hotel. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: NOI-A The project contractor will submit a construction staging plan to the City, and receive approval for that plan, prior to the issuance of any permit on the site. The plan shall include the location of all staging areas, access and haul routes, location of fixed equipment, etc. The City shall periodically inspect the construction site to ensure compliance. Responsible Party: Project contractor, Building Division 254 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -57- XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Source: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Finance “Report E-1 - Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State January 1, 2017 and 2018” and “Report E-5 - City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/01/2018”; 2010 U.S. Census. Setting The City’s 2018 population is 41,204 (Department of Finance), an increase of 1.5% over 2017. There are approximately 24,239 housing units in the City (American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates); the majority are single-family homes. The Coral Mountain apartment complex on the southern portion of the Specific Plan area contains 176 units. With an average household size of 2.63 persons (CA Dept. of Finance, 2018) in La Quinta, it has a population of approximately 463 residents. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts to population growth. The project proposes up to 140 multi- family residential units on the northern portion of the Specific Plan area. With an average household size of 2.63 persons (CA Dept. of Finance, 2018) in La Quinta, it could generate a new population of approximately 369 residents at build out. The project would also facilitate new commercial and hotel development on the Specific Plan site, which could attract workers and temporary visitors to the area, thereby indirectly inducing growth. However, these land uses are limited to 305,000 square feet of commercial development and 108 hotel rooms, both of which are limited in scale and not expected to attract substantial numbers of permanent residents. Future development would be accessed by existing roads and connect to existing utility infrastructure. No extensions would be required. Impacts will be less than significant. 255 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -58- b, c) No Impact. The proposed project would not result in the displacement of people or existing housing. The project is proposed on the northern portion of the Specific Plan site, which is vacant. Existing housing and residents of the Coral Mountain apartments on the southern portion of the site will not be displaced or otherwise impacted. No impact will occur. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 256 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -59- XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Source: 2035 General Plan; Google Earth Pro 7.3.1.4507, accessed October 2018; Desert Sands Unified School District “School Impact/Developer Fees,” effective August 11, 2018. Setting Fire Protection: The City contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department for fire protection. The nearest fire station is Riverside County Fire Station 93 at 44555 Adams Street, approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the project site. The City has two more fire stations (station# 52 and 70) located at 78111 Avenue 52 and 54001 Madison Street. Fire services in La Quinta are based on delivering a minimum of 3 personnel in the standard response time of 5 minutes or less 90% of the time. Police Protection: The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department for police protection services. The City is served by the police station located at 86625 Airport Blvd in Thermal. The police department consists of 51 sworn officers and 5 community service officers. The average response time for the highest priority emergency calls is 5 minutes. Schools: The City is located within the boundaries of two school districts: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Families living west of Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 48 are served by DSUSD. Those living east of Jefferson Street and south of Avenue 48 are served by CVUSD. The Specific Plan area is located within the boundaries of DSUSD which enrolls approximately 28,000 students. The nearest school to the site is La Quinta High School, approximately ½-mile to the northwest. 257 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -60- Parks: In the City of La Quinta, a total of 5,259.2 acres are dedicated for open space/ recreation (General Plan Table II-3), including golf courses and 72 acres of parks. The three types of parks in the City are community, neighborhood, and mini/pocket parks. The nearest park to the Specific Plan area is La Quinta Park, approximately ¾-mile to the northwest. Discussion of Impacts a) Fire Protection Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have less than significant impacts to fire protection services. It will increase the demand for fire services as new development, residents, and visitors will require fire protection. Developers will be required to pay the City’s development impact fees for fire facilities and apparatus to pay for their fair share of future facilities. The project will generate property tax and sales tax revenues, and the hotel will generate transient occupancy tax revenues, that will offset costs associated with fire protection. The Fire Department will review future project site plans to ensure they meet applicable fire standards and regulations. No construction of new or expanded fire services or facilities are required for the proposed project. Project-related impacts will be less than significant. Police Protection Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts to police protection services. Build out of the Specific Plan area will result in new development and residents that will require police protection. Police personnel will be able to access the site using Highway 111. The project will be required to comply with all Police Department regulations and procedures. Future onsite development will generate property tax and sales tax revenues, and the hotel will generate transient occupancy tax revenues, that will offset costs associated with police protection. Project-related impacts will be less than significant. Schools Less Than Significant Impact. At build out, the proposed project is projected to have a student population of 34 students, as shown in the following table. 258 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -61- Table 6 Projected Student Generation Grade Level Maximum Build Out Units Student Generation Rate* Projected Enrollment Elementary School (K-6) 140 0.1267 18 Middle School (7-8) 140 0.0522 8 High School (9-12) 140 0.0543 8 Total: 34 * Student generation rates for multi-family dwellings, Desert Sands Unified School District, from Table V-1 of La Quinta General Plan 2035. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts on schools. New students will increase the demand for educational services at DSUSD public schools and/or local private schools. To mitigate impacts to schools and provide funds for the construction of new facilities, onsite development projects will be required to pay the state-mandated school fees in place at the time that development occurs. Current DSUSD developer impact fees are $3.79 per square foot for residential development and $0.61 per square foot for commercial development. Given the limited number of students associated with build out of the proposed project, impacts will be less than significant. Parks Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is projected to result in a build out population of 369 permanent residents at build out. It will also accommodate temporary visitors and guests at a 108-room hotel. The proposed hotel site plan includes a swimming pool and sports court for guests. The project will result in less than significant impacts to parks. Permanent residents, temporary visitors, and hotel guests may increase the usage of public parks; however, the increase is not expected to be substantial or result in the need for new or expanded parks. The hotel includes a swimming pool and sports court, which will provide recreation opportunities for guests. Future site plans for residential development may also include recreational amenities for residents, which could further reduce impacts to local parks. Other Public Facilities Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts to other public facilities. The project will not increase development intensities or populations to the extent that additional public facilities are required, and will generate tax revenue to offset the marginal increase in service. Increases in the demand for City services will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 259 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -62- XV. RECREATION: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Source: 2035 General Plan. Setting Residents of La Quinta currently have access to 72 acres of parks, 147 acres of nature preserves containing recreational parkland, 845 acres of regional parks, a 525-acre municipal golf course, and other private and public recreational facilities, including a community center, Community Health and Wellness Center, and museum. The General Plan establishes a requirement for providing a minimum of 5 acres of park land per 1,000 residents. Discussion of Impacts a, b) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is projected to result in a permanent population of approximately 369 residents at build out, and the proposed hotel would accommodate temporary visitors. The proposed hotel site plan includes a swimming pool and sports court. Future residential development may include pools, fitness rooms, and/or other recreational spaces. The project will result in less than significant impacts on recreational facilities. Residents and hotel guests can be expected to use local and regional parks and recreational facilities. However, given the limited scale of potential onsite development, increased usage is not expected to result in substantial physical deterioration of existing facilities. Demand for recreational facilities will be decreased somewhat by amenities built onsite, including the proposed hotel swimming pool and sports court and any future amenities at the residential component. Development proposals for such facilities will be evaluated on a project-by-project basis and will be required to meet City codes and other building standards. Impacts to recreational facilities will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 260 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -63- XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Source: 2035 General Plan; “The Dune Palms Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, City of La Quinta,” Urban Crossroads, November 16, 2018; Sunline Transit Agency website, www.sunline.org/transit_routes/route/line111, accessed November 2018; “The Dune Palms/HW- 111 Commercial and Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis, La Quinta, California,” Urban Crossroads, July 16, 2009. 261 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -64- Setting The subject property is located south of Highway 111 and east of Dune Palms Road. Highway 111 is three lanes in each direction and designated a Riverside County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) roadway. The nearest traffic signals to the project site are at Highway 111 and Costco Drive, and Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. The proposed project will be accessed by two new driveways: 1) one on Highway 111 (right-in/right-out only access), and 2) one leading to Costco Drive (full access) via the adjacent shopping center. It is expected that future onsite development will also have access to the south on Vista Coralina Lane. The driveways will also be used for emergency access. Regional access will be provided via Highway 111 and Interstate-10 via Washington Street and Jefferson Street. A traffic impact analysis for the currently proposed project was prepared in 2018 and is provided in Appendix B. Discussion of Impacts a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A project-specific Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared to evaluate the potential transportation impacts of the proposed project (see Appendix B). The analysis was based upon a variety of sources, including the General Plan Circulation Element, La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-13, Riverside County Congestion Management Program (CMP), and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. Intersection and roadway operations in the project area are subject to Level of Service criteria set forth by the City. In addition, Highway 111 is designated by Riverside County as a Congestion Management Program (CMP) roadway and subject to operational criteria set forth by Riverside County. The TIA found that the project would not result in significant impacts. However, traffic improvements for ingress and egress to the project site were recommended to comply with City standards. Project Trip Generation Trip generation is the amount of traffic that is both attracted to and produced by a development. Table 7 shows the trip generation rates used to forecast trip generation for the land uses proposed by the project; rates are based on data collected by ITE. The ITE Land Use Codes used for the project trip generation analysis are numbers 220 (multi-family housing, low-rise), 310 (hotel), and 820 (shopping center), consistent with proposed land uses. 262 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -65- Table 7 Project Trip Generation Rates Land Use ITE LU Code Units * Peak Hour** Daily Morning Evening In- bound Out- bound Total In- bound Out- bound Total Multi-family Housing (low-rise) 220 DU 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 Hotel 310 RM 0.28 0.19 0.47 0.31 0.29 0.60 8.36 Shopping Center 820 TSF 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 37.75 * DU = dwelling unit; RM = room; TSF = Thousand Square Feet ** Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). Table 8 assigns the trip generation rates to the proposed project. As shown, the proposed project is anticipated to generate a net total of 8,586 trip-ends per day on a typical weekday, with 395 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the weekday AM peak hour and 843 VPH during the weekday PM peak hour. This is a conservative analysis that does not account for potential vehicle trip reductions resulting from the use of public transit, walking, and/or bicycling. Table 8 Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use Quantity Units* Peak Hour** Daily Morning Evening In- bound Out- bound Total In- boun d Out- bound Total Multi- family Housing (low-rise) 140 DU 15 50 65 49 29 78 1,025 Internal Capture*** 0 -1 -1 -23 -13 -36 -473 Hotel 108 RM 30 21 51 33 32 65 903 Internal Capture*** 0 -3 -3 -7 -5 -12 -167 Shopping Center 305,000 TSF 178 109 287 558 604 1,16 2 11,514 Internal Capture*** -4 0 -4 -17 -29 -46 -456 Pass-by Reduction (34% PM/Daily) 0 0 0 -184 -184 -368 -3,760 Total Net Project Trips 219 176 395 409 434 843 8,586 * DU = dwelling unit; RM = room; TSF = Thousand Square Feet ** Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). *** Internal capture is based on the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool (ITE recommended methodology). TIA Methodology To evaluate the significance of potential project impacts and cumulative impacts, the TIA analyzed the following scenarios: • Existing (2018) conditions • Existing plus Project (E+P) conditions 263 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -66- • Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project (EAP) (2020) conditions • Existing plus Ambient Growth plus Project plus Cumulative (EAPC) (2020) conditions An ambient growth rate of 1.09% per year was added to existing traffic volumes to account for background (area-wide) traffic increases that up to Project Opening Year 2020. It is important to note that the analysis is conservative, insofar as it assumes build out of the entire Specific Plan area immediately (2020). Actual development of the 7 acre mixed use component of the Plan area is expected to occur over a longer period of time. The cumulative analysis scenario also factors in anticipated future traffic generated by 37 development projects which are either approved or being processed in the project area. Intersection Impact Analysis The City of La Quinta requires that signalized intersections or all-way stop controlled intersections operate at LOS D or better, and that cross-street stop-controlled intersections operate at LOS E or better for the side street. The Riverside County CMP System of Highway and Roadways requires that intersections along CMP facilities (Highway 111) operate at a minimum LOS of not worse than LOS E. However, to provide a conservative analysis, the TIA considered LOS D operations as acceptable along Highway 111. The TIA analyzed 21 existing study area intersections and determined that all are currently operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS) during the peak hours. The TIA found that the addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any significant impacts to 21 study area intersections under E+P conditions, EAP (2020) conditions, or EAPC (2020) conditions, based on the City’s criteria for potentially significant traffic impacts (La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #06-13). Roadway Segment Impact Analysis The City of La Quinta has established LOS D as the minimum Level of Service for its roadway segments. In the Riverside County CMP System of Highway and Roadways, the minimum LOS required is to be not worse than LOS E. However, the TIA considered LOS D operations as acceptable on Highway 111 roadway segments to present a conservative analysis. The TIA determined that all 21 study area roadway segments analyzed are currently operating at acceptable LOS, and that all are anticipated to operate at acceptable LOS under E+P conditions, EAP (2020) conditions, and EAPC (2020) conditions. Recommended Traffic Improvements No LOS deficiencies are anticipated during either of the peak hours for future traffic analysis scenarios. However, roadway improvements are recommended in the Mitigation Measures section below (also see TIA Sections 1.5.4 through 1.5.7), including auxiliary lane storage length improvements to accommodate peak hour queues with the addition of Project traffic. 264 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -67- b) Less Than Significant Impact. As explained above, Highway 111 is designated by Riverside County as a Congestion Management Program (CMP) roadway. The Riverside County CMP System of Highway and Roadways requires that intersections along CMP facilities operate at a minimum LOS of not worse than LOS E, and the minimum LOS required for roadway segments is to be not worse than LOS E. The TIA found that the proposed project will result in acceptable LOS on roadways and intersections in the project area, including Highway 111, under E+P conditions, EAP (2020) conditions, and EAPC (2020) conditions. New ingress and egress driveways and standard curb and gutter improvements will be required along Highway 111 to facilitate the project; however, impacts to Highway 111 will be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with the County congestion management program. c) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in airport safety impacts because of distance from the nearest airport. The project site is approximately 3 miles south of the Bermuda Dunes Airport. The project will not increase airport safety hazards or impact the facilities or operations of regional airports, including an increase in traffic levels. No impact will occur. d) No Impact. The proposed project will not increase safety hazards due to a design feature. Site plans and project-related traffic improvements, such as turn lanes and queue lengths, will be developed in accordance with City design guidelines. Proposed residential and commercial land uses are compatible with surrounding development and, therefore, vehicles accessing the site will be compatible with the vehicle mix currently in the project area. No impact will occur. e) No Impact. The proposed project will not result in inadequate emergency access. The project will be accessed by the existing street system, including Highway 111 and Costco Drive via the adjacent shopping center. Driveways and parking lots will comply with City standards to assure adequate emergency access, turning radius, signage, and other requirements. Prior to construction, the Fire and Police Departments will review project plans to ensure safety measures are addressed. No impact will occur. f) No Impact. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted transit plans or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of transit or alternative modes of transportation. The project area is served by the Sunline Transit Agency with bus services (Line 111) along Highway 111 and other nearby roads (Line 70). The nearest bus stop is on Highway 111 in front of the Komar/Costco shopping center, immediately east of the project area. Future residents, guests, visitors, and employees would have access to Sunline bus service close to the project site. No changes to transit service would occur. Sidewalks are already built along Highway 111 adjacent to the project site. The project is not expected to alter existing sidewalks. Highway 111 is designated as a Class II (on-road) bicycle lane (General Plan Exhibit II-6). The project is not expected to change existing bike routes. 265 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -68- No project-related impacts to transit or other modes of transportation are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: TR-1 Intersection of Highway 111 and Driveway 1 • Construct an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane with a minimum of 186 feet of storage • Construct a south leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project TR-2 Intersection of Highway 111 and Costco Drive The existing eastbound right turn lane shall be extended to provide a minimum of 400 feet of storage, with the project proponent paying 100% of the fair share of Project-specific impacts. TR-3 Costco Drive and Driveway 2 Construct a west leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project. TR-4 Driveway 3 and Vista Coralina Lane Construct a north leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project. TR-5 Curb-and-Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements: Highway 111 Existing curb-and-gutter and sidewalk improvements on Highway 111 shall be modified accordingly based on proposed driveway locations. TR-6 Curb-and-Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements: Vista Coralina Lane Curb-and-gutter and sidewalk improvements shall be constructed on the north side of Vista Coralina Lane from the Project’s western boundary to its eastern boundary. TR-7 Signing and Striping Program Onsite traffic signing and striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project. TR-8 Truck Access To accommodate truck turns, Driveway 1 on Highway 111 and Driveway 2 via Costco Drive shall be improved to provide the recommended curb radius shown on TIA Exhibit 1-5 or as directed by the City Traffic Engineer. TR-9 Fair Share Costs The Project shall contribute 100% of its fair share for improvements to Highway 111 and Costco Drive. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: TR-A The City Traffic Engineer shall review all development plans for the hotel and subsequent projects to assure that on-site improvements are consistent with the recommendations of the TIA. Responsible Party: City Traffic Engineer. 266 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -69- XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Source: 2035 General Plan; “Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, Dune Palms Specific Plan,” CRM TECH, October 13, 2008; City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; AB 52 and SB 18 response letters to the City from the Native American Heritage Commission and Native American tribes, June through October 2018. Setting Around 1000 BC, the City of La Quinta was home to the Cahuilla people, who were hunters and gatherers and one of the few Native American tribes to dig water wells. Most of the cultural resources in the City developed in and around ancient Lake Cahuilla. The oldest cultural resources have been identified from the western portion of the City and date back about 2,700 years. Some descendants of the Pass and Desert Cahuilla still live in the region and are associated with local tribes, including the Torres Martinez, Cabazon, and Augustine to the east and south of the City, and the Agua Caliente and Morongo to the west. No tribal reservations are within the City boundaries. 267 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -70- Discussion of Impacts a) No Impact. The proposed project will not impact historical resources because none are known to occur onsite. As discussed in Section V.a, Cultural Resources, a 2008 cultural resources survey determined that the Specific Plan area contains no cultural resources that are eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. The subject property does not contain any historic sites listed on the La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database. No impact will occur. b) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will result in grading, construction, and other ground-disturbing activities that could impact potential tribal resources. 2008 Cultural Resources Survey As discussed in Section V.b, Cultural Resources, a site-specific cultural resources survey was conducted on the Specific Plan area in 2008. No archaeological resources were found onsite, but it was noted that numerous such resources had been found on properties in the project vicinity in conjunction with other development projects. Therefore, the project area had a high sensitivity for potential archaeological resources. As part of the 2008 survey, the City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and more than 14 Native American tribal representatives to solicit comments regarding any potential cultural resources concerns over the (then-proposed) Specific Plan. The NAHC records search identified no Native American cultural resources in the vicinity of the project area. The Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians provided the only response to the request for comment; it recommended the presence of a tribal monitor during ground-disturbing activities, notification to a qualified archaeologist of any cultural finds, adherence to proper procedures if human remains are discovered, and copies of all cultural resource documentation. 2018 Tribal Consultation As discussed in Section V.b, beginning in June 2018, the City contacted the NAHC and sent 51 letters to initiate the AB 52 and SB 18 consultation processes with Native American tribes with cultural and traditional affiliations in the project area and General Plan area. Nine (9) responses were received; none indicated the presence of known tribal resources onsite. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) stated the Specific Plan area is outside the Tribe’s reservation but within its Traditional Use Area. The ACBCI and several other tribes identified the need for a tribal monitor and qualified archaeologist during ground-disturbing activities, the need for proper notifications and procedures in the event buried cultural deposits are encountered, and copies of cultural resources documentation generated in conjunction with the project. 268 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -71- Summary No tribal resources are known to exist in the Specific Plan area. However, the site is within the Traditional Use Area of the ACBCI, and the project vicinity is highly sensitive for archaeological resources. Therefore, mitigation measures and a monitoring program are included in Section V to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. With implementation of these mitigation measures and a monitoring program, impacts associated with archaeological resources will be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation measures: See Section V, Cultural Resources. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: See Section V, Cultural Resources. 269 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -72- XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b)Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e)Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X f)Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? X g)Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Source: 2035 General Plan; Coachella Valley Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan; CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) facility database, http://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/, accessed October 15, 2018. 270 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -73- Setting Wastewater Treatment Two of the Coachella Valley Water District’s (CVWD) wastewater treatment plants serve the City of La Quinta and surrounding areas. Water Reclamation Plant (WRP)-7 is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, and the Mid-Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) is located northwest of the City. The capacity of WRP-7 and the Mid-Valley WRP are 5 and 9.5 million gallons per day, respectively. For land south of Miles Avenue, including the subject Specific Plan site, sewage is treated at the Mid-Valley Water WRP. CVWD continually increases the capacity of its wastewater reclamation facilities by constructing new treatment ponds, aeration, and other structures throughout the Coachella Valley, as needed. CVWD implements all requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board pertaining to water quality and wastewater discharge. Domestic Water The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) provides domestic water to the City. The primary water source is groundwater extracted by deep wells from the Whitewater River Sub-basin. CVWD’s service area lies in the Whitewater River Watershed. CVWD, as an urban water supplier, is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years in response to the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMP Act), California Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656. CVWD’s UWMP is a planning tool that documents actions in support of long-term water resources planning and ensures adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future urban water demands. CVWD also prepares an annual report to document and analyze the region’s water needs and long-term demand for domestic water. This analysis includes conservation measures and replenishment programs that make it possible for CVWD to meet increasing demand of its service area. Storm Water Management Storm water drainage infrastructure in La Quinta consists of a network of interconnected regional and local drainage systems. It includes natural and improved streams, storm drains, storm channels, and catch basins that manage stormwater that flows into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. CVWD and the City of La Quinta oversee this drainage system. In 2009, the “La Quinta Master Drainage Plan” was prepared to address storm water runoff in the City. The City uses detention and retention basins to temporarily contain runoff from various sources, such as stormwater and landscape irrigation, allowing them to either evaporate or percolate into the subsurface. The City requires new developments to have sufficiently sized basins to manage surface water flows. New developments are required to utilize an infiltration rate of 0.6 ft/day. 271 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -74- Solid Waste Solid waste collection and disposal in La Quinta is provided by Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services under a franchise agreement with the City. Burrtec collects solid waste and transports it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in Cathedral City. Waste is then transferred to one of three landfills: Lamb Canyon in Beaumont, Badlands in Moreno Valley, or El Sobrante in Corona. All three are operated by the County of Riverside. Discussion of Impacts a, e) Less Than Significant Impact. Future development proposed in the Specific Plan area will generate wastewater, as projected in the table below. Table 9 Projected Wastewater Generation Land Use Build Out Conditions Demand Factor1 Projected Daily Wastewater Generation Commercial (retail) 305,000 sq. ft. 100 gallons/1,000 sq. ft./day 30,500 gallons/day Commercial (hotel) 108 rooms 250 gallons/room/day 27,000 gallons/day Residential 140 MF units, or 369 residents* 250 gallons/capita/day 92,250 gallons/day Total: 149,750 gallons/day * 140 dwelling units x 2.63 persons per household (CA Dept. of Finance, 2018) = 369 residents 1 based on rates from CVWD and other local development projects Project-related impacts to wastewater treatment facilities will be less than significant. The project will generate wastewater and require construction of onsite sewer infrastructure that will connect to existing sewer lines. Wastewater will be transported to the CVWD’s Mid-Valley WRP, which has a current capacity of 9.5 million gallons per day. At build out, the proposed project is projected to generate 149,750 gallons of wastewater per day, which represents 1.6% of total capacity at the Mid-Valley WRP. The Mid-Valley WRP is subject to wastewater treatment standards established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. All components of the proposed project will be required to design facilities consistent with CVWD and Regional Board standards. These standards and requirements will assure that impacts associated with wastewater standards will be less than significant. b, d) Less Than Significant Impact. As shown in Table 5 (Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality), the proposed project is projected to use 100.0 acre-feet of water annually at build out for domestic use and landscape irrigation. This represents less than 1 percent of groundwater in storage in the Whitewater River Subbasin. 272 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -75- Therefore, project impacts associated with domestic water demand are expected to be less than significant. The proposed project will be required to implement all water conservation measures imposed by CVWD under both normal and drought conditions over the life of the project. Onsite development will tie into existing domestic water lines. No new wells or additional water infrastructure or entitlements will be required. Impacts to water facilities and infrastructure will be less than significant. c) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will result in less than significant impacts on stormwater management facilities. The project will be required to manage the 100-year storm on-site, as required by City standards. The stormwater system will connect to existing conveyance drains at the Coral Mountain Apartments on the southern portion of the Specific Plan area, which discharge into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The outfall at the channel was designed to carry all future flows from the entire Specific Plan area and, therefore, has sufficient capacity to accommodate future onsite runoff. Site-specific drainage plans will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer to assure that they meet City standards. These standards and requirements will assure that impacts associated with stormwater management will be less than significant. f, g) Less Than Significant Impact. Build out of the proposed project will generate additional solid waste, as estimated below. Table 10 Projected Solid Waste Generation Land Use Build Out Conditions Generation Rate Projected Annual Solid Waste Generation Commercial (retail) 305,000 sq. ft., or 305 employees4 2.41 tons/employee/year1 735.05 tons/year Commercial (hotel) 108 rooms 1.31 tons/room/year2 141.5 tons/year Residential 140 MF units, or 369 residents5 0.255 tons/resident/year3 94.1 tons/year Total: 970.65 tons/year 1 p. 107 (Retail Trade, Other), 2014 Generator-Based Characterization of Commercial Sector Disposal and Diversion in California, CalRecycle, September 10, 2015. 2 p. 67 (Hotels & Lodging), 2014 Generator-Based Characterization of Commercial Sector Disposal and Diversion in California, CalRecycle, September 10, 2015. 3 CalRecycle Waste Characterization Tool: Residential Waste Stream Data Export for La Quinta 4 US Department of Energy estimates for square footage per employee in retail. 5 140 dwelling units x 2.63 persons per household (CA Dept. of Finance, 2018) = 369 residents The project will result in less than significant impacts on solid waste management facilities as sufficient landfill capacity is available to serve the project. The Lamb Canyon Landfill has a remaining capacity of 19.2 million cubic yards and an 273 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -76- estimated closure date of 2029. The Badlands Landfill has a remaining capacity of 15.7 million cubic yards and an estimated closure date of 2022. The El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of 145.5 million tons and an estimated closure date of 2045. Each facility has available capacity to accommodate waste generated by the project. Burrtec and Riverside County are required to comply with local, regional, and state requirements associated with solid waste disposal. Impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: None. 274 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -77- XVIV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X a) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Biological Resources The proposed project will not threaten to eliminate or significantly reduce fish or wildlife habitat or otherwise adversely impact a fish or wildlife species. The northern portion of the Specific Plan area is surrounded by development in all directions and is not known to contain substantial or rare animal or plant populations. However, future development will result in ground disturbance and removal of onsite vegetation and has the potential to impact burrowing owls and/or nesting birds. The mitigation measures included in Section IV, Biological Resources, will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 275 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -78- Cultural Resources No historic or archaeological resources have been identified on the subject property; however, the site was part of a traditional use area of native peoples, and numerous cultural resources have been found in the project vicinity. Ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed project may unearth sensitive cultural resources, which would represent a potentially significant impact. Mitigation measures included in Section V, Cultural Resources, will assure that impacts to historical/archaeological resources remain less than significant. b, c) Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Long-term operation of the proposed project will exceed air pollutant thresholds for NOx due to mobile source (vehicle) emissions. Therefore, the project will contribute to cumulative air quality in the Coachella Valley. As explained in Sections III (Air Quality) and VII (Greenhouse Gas Emissions), the subject property is in the Regional Commercial (CR) zone, and proposed land uses are consistent with those allowed in the CR zone. Impacts of development in the CR zone were analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The EIR found that potential air quality impacts could not be mitigated to less than significant levels, and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were approved by the City. Project benefits are found to outweigh potential air quality impacts, consistent with that identified in the General Plan EIR. The project is consistent with the City’s vision for this parcel as described in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which provides detailed goals, policies and programs for the long term growth of Highway 111 as a Mixed Use corridor. Benefits of the proposed project include maximizing the development potential of a vacant parcel along the primary regional commercial corridor, expanding the City’s tax revenue base and share of the hospitality (hotel) industry, and realizing the benefits of mixed-use development by placing residential uses in proximity to employment and retail centers. The Project is consistent with the City’s vision of mixed-use development along the Highway 111 corridor, and project benefits are found to outweigh potential air quality impacts. 276 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -79- Summary of Mitigation Measures Air Quality AQ-1 The following measures shall be implemented during project earth moving, grading and construction activities: • Construction equipment, delivery trucks, worker vehicles, and haul trucks will limit idling time to no more than 5 minutes. • The grading contractor shall certify in writing that all construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained in good operating condition. Certification shall be provided to City Engineer for review and approval. • Cover all transported loads of soils, wet materials prior to transport, provide freeboard (space from the top of the material to the top of the truck) to reduce PM10 and deposition of particulate matter during transportation. • Diesel-powered construction equipment shall utilize aqueous diesel fuels and be equipped with diesel oxidation catalysts. • Water site and equipment morning and evening and during all earth-moving operations. • Wash off trucks as they leave the project site as necessary to control fugitive dust emissions. • Construction equipment and materials shall be sited as far away from residential and park uses as practicable. AQ-2 All mixed use and retail commercial projects within the Specific Plan area shall be subject to the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Biological Resources BIO-1 To comply with the MBTA, a nesting bird survey will be required prior to the removal of any vegetation or trees, or grading on the site, if such activity is to occur between January 1 and August 31 of any year. The nesting bird survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist and end no less than 3 days prior to the activity. The biologist’s report of the survey and any measures required to protect nesting birds shall be approved by the City prior to the initiation of any activity. This mitigation measure will not apply if vegetation or tree removal, or grading, are proposed between September 1 and December 31 of any year. BIO-2 Within 30 days and prior to the initiation of any grubbing or grading activities on the site, a protocol-compliant Burrowing Owl survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If the species is identified onsite, CDFW shall be consulted, and mitigation measures shall be implemented to avoid or relocate the owls. 277 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -80- Cultural Resources CUL-1 The project site shall be monitored during on- and off-site grubbing, trenching, and rough grading by qualified archaeological monitors, including a Native American monitor. Proof of retention of monitors shall be given to the City prior to issuance of the first earth-moving or clearing permit. The monitor shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment upon the discovery of cultural resources to allow for City notification and analysis. The final report on the monitoring shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Collected archaeological resources shall be properly packaged for long-term curation in polyethylene self-seal bags, vials, or film cans as appropriate, all within acid-free, standard size, comprehensively labeled archive boxes and delivered to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the property. Materials shall be accompanied by descriptive catalogue, field notes and records, primary research data, and the original graphics. Noise NOI-1 Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays. The Project construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the note, and the City shall conduct periodic inspection at its discretion. NOI-2 All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 278 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -81- NOI-3 All equipment staging shall be placed in areas that create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the project site during all project construction (i.e., to the center). NOI-4 Construction haul truck deliveries shall be limited to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sunday). The contractor shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck-related noise. NOI-5 Prior to obtaining building permits and once precise grading plans, architectural plans, and building designs are complete, a final noise study that specifies interior noise reduction requirements shall be prepared for each future onsite development project, including the proposed hotel. Transportation/ Traffic TR-1 Intersection of Highway 111 and Driveway 1 • Construct an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane with a minimum of 186 feet of storage • Construct a south leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project TR-2 Intersection of Highway 111 and Costco Drive The existing eastbound right turn lane shall be extended to provide a minimum of 400 feet of storage, with the project proponent paying 100% of the fair share of Project-specific impacts. TR-3 Costco Drive and Driveway 2 Construct a west leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project. TR-4 Driveway 3 and Vista Coralina Lane Construct a north leg to facilitate ingress and egress access to the proposed Project. TR-5 Curb-and-Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements: Highway 111 Existing curb-and-gutter and sidewalk improvements on Highway 111 shall be modified accordingly based on proposed driveway locations. 279 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -82- TR-6 Curb-and-Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements: Vista Coralina Lane Curb-and-gutter and sidewalk improvements shall be constructed on the north side of Vista Coralina Lane from the Project’s western boundary to its eastern boundary. TR-7 Signing and Striping Program Onsite traffic signing and striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project. TR-8 Truck Access To accommodate truck turns, Driveway 1 on Highway 111 and Driveway 2 via Costco Drive shall be improved to provide the recommended curb radius shown on TIA Exhibit 1-5 or as directed by the City Traffic Engineer. TR-9 Fair Share Costs The Project shall contribute 100% of its fair share for improvements to Highway 111 and Costco Drive. 280 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -83- References: I. AESTHETICS: 2035 General Plan; La Quinta Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code; California Department of Transportation (California Scenic Highway Mapping System); http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/, accessed September 2018; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; “City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Study,” ULI Technical Assistance Panel, July 23, 2018. II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Conservation, January 2012, and Riverside County Important Farmland Map, 2016. III. AIR QUALITY: 2035 General Plan; “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology,” prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised, July 2008; “2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan,” August 1, 2003; CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: 2035 General Plan; “Baseline Biological Survey of the San Miguel de Allende Project Site, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California,” AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., November 2008; “Preliminary Determination of Jurisdictional Limits, United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Waters of the United States, Including Wetlands and State Waters Subject to California Department of Fish and Game Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement,” AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc., December 2008; “Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan,” 2007; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: 2035 General Plan; “Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, Dune Palms Specific Plan,” CRM TECH, October 13, 2008; City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; AB 52 and SB 18 response letters to the City from the Native American Heritage Commission and Native American tribes, June through October 2018. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: 2035 General Plan; “Soil Survey of Riverside County, California, Coachella Valley Area,” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, 1980; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; “Land Subsidence, Groundwater Levels, and Geology in the Coachella Valley, California, 1993-2010,” USGS, Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5075; City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin #09-03. 281 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -84- VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: 2035 General Plan; California Global Warming Solutions Act; CalEEMod version 2016.3.2; La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (2012). VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste; State Water Resources Control Board; “Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan,” Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, October 14, 2004. “Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, South Side of Highway 111 and East of Dune Palms Road,” Earth Systems Southwest, June 20, 2006; “Report of Phase II Investigation, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 600-020-004 and -005, Highway 111 and East of Dune Palms Road,” Earth Systems Southwest, February 7, 2007. IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: 2035 General Plan; FEMA Flood Insurance Rate FIRM Panel No. 06065C2234G; “Preliminary Hydrology/Hydraulics Report, City of La Quinta, Dune Palms/Hwy 111 Project,” MSA Consulting, Inc., October 14, 2008; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; Coachella Valley Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: 2035 General Plan; Zoning Map; “City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Study,” ULI Technical Assistance Panel, July 23, 2018; Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 2007. XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: 2035 General Plan. XII. NOISE: 2035 General Plan; “Dune Palms/Hw-111 Development Noise Analysis,” Urban Crossroads, November 5, 2009 (revised). XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: 2035 General Plan; California Department of Finance “Report E-1 - Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State January 1, 2017 and 2018” ” and “Report E-5 - City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/01/2018”; 2010 U.S. Census. XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: 2035 General Plan; Google Earth Pro 7.3.1.4507, accessed October 2018; Desert Sands Unified School District “School Impact/Developer Fees,” effective August 11, 2018. XV. RECREATION: 2035 General Plan. XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: 2035 General Plan; “The Dune Palms Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, City of La Quinta,” Urban Crossroads, November 16, 2018; Sunline Transit Agency website, 282 Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment Initial Study December 2018 -85- www.sunline.org/transit_routes/route/line111, accessed November 2018; “The Dune Palms/HW-111 Commercial and Residential Development Traffic Impact Analysis, La Quinta, California,” Urban Crossroads, July 16, 2009. XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: 2035 General Plan; “Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, Dune Palms Specific Plan,” CRM TECH, October 13, 2008; City of La Quinta Historic Resources Inventory Database; “Highway 111 & Dune Palms Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report,” Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc., March 2010; AB 52 and SB 18 response letters to the City from the Native American Heritage Commission and Native American tribes, June through October 2018. XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: 2035 General Plan; Coachella Valley Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan; CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) facility database, http://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/, accessed October 15, 2018. 283 284 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 2008-085, AMENDMENT 1) HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN ADOPTED: Page 1 OF 2 SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2018-0002 shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the approved Specific Plan document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of Specific Plan 2018- 0002, these conditions shall take precedence. 3. Specific Plan 2018-0002 shall comply with all applicable terms, conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2018-0005 Specific Plan 2008-085 Environmental Assessment 2008-600 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 4. Specific Plan 2008-0002 shall be developed in compliance with the mitigation measures as identified in the Initial Study for Environmental Assessment 2018-0005, dated December 2018. 5. Development of projects on the northern ±10 acres shall include east and west reciprocal vehicular access within projects, unless the City Engineer and Design and Development Director determine it is not required. Design of these access ways shall be to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director and City Engineer. Timing of construction of these access ways shall be determined during Site Development Permit stage of project(s), to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director and City Engineer. 285 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL – RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 (SPECIFIC PLAN 2008-085, AMENDMENT 1) HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN ADOPTED: Page 2 OF 2 6. Development of project(s) on the northern ±10 acres shall include a reciprocal vehicular access to the existing commercial center to the east (Costco/Komar Desert Center), as shown on the traffic study from the Initial Study. Design of this access shall be to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director and City Engineer. This access shall be constructed prior to full build out or any time earlier, to the discretion and satisfaction of the Design and Development Director and City Engineer. 286 Project Information CASE NUMBER: SPECIFIC PLAN 2018-0002 (SP2008-085, AMD 1) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2018-0005 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST: ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 2008-085) TO ALLOW FOR COMMERCIAL AND/OR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTHERN ±10 ACRE PORTION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, REVISE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND RECOMMEND CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROX. 300 FEET EAST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD APN: 600-020-053 & 600-020-055 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND COMMERCIAL PARK SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: HIGHWAY 111/REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND VACANT SOUTH: MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES EXISTING SCHOOL DISTRICT EAST: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER WEST: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND COMMERCIAL PARK EXISTING COMMERCIAL ATTACHMENT 1 287 288 Amended: 2019 ATTACHMENT 2 289 CITY OF LA QUINTA – HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2: SETTING ................................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 3: LAND USE PLAN ...................................................................................................... 12 SECTION 4: DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................................. 15 SECTION 5: SPECIFIC PLAN ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 26 SECTION 6: RELATIONSHIP TO LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN POLICIES ................................ 27 APPENDIX A: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION ....................................................... 37 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 40 290 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 1 of 38 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document, entitled Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan (“Plan”) has been written in compliance with the City of La Quinta (“City”) General Plan and Municipal Code (“LQMC”), and meets the guidelines provided by the State of California for specific plans. Development of Plan area is referred to herein as the “Project” and consequently, the Plan area is also referred to as the Project site. The Plan area is located directly south of Highway 111 just east of Dune Palms Road and is approximately 22 acres in size. The information within establishes the policy vision for the Plan area and provides for regulatory standards to ensure its implementation as the area develops. It is deliberately designed to permit a degree of flexibility and to allow for changes in local standards and the housing and commercial markets. Development of the Plan area is intended to be a collaborative effort between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”), the La Quinta Housing Authority (“Authority”) and private developers (“Developers”). The northern portion of the Plan area is designated by the General Plan as Regional Commercial and zoned as Regional Commercial; the southern portion is designated as Commercial Park by the General Plan and zoned Commercial Park. It is bounded on the east by an existing commercial development (Komar/Costco Center) and on the west by a service station, an office complex and a mini-storage facility. The Desert Sands Unified School District (“DSUSD”) service and administrative facility, including the school bus lot, is located to the south. The Project as a whole is envisioned as a vibrant, dynamic development that serves both the housing needs of low income residents of La Quinta, as well as La Quinta shoppers and others in the area who desire a wider variety of commercial opportunities with goods and services that are not currently available in the immediate vicinity. The residential portion of the Project will add up to 200 new housing units in a series of buildings on the southern half of the property, and will use an architectural style compatible with other desert architecture as well as the environment itself. The residences will be developed as affordable apartment homes, with all units designated for occupants at affordability levels as yet to be determined, but including very low-, low-, and possibly moderate-income as defined by California Redevelopment Law. It will contain a mix of housing sizes to serve a variety of residents from singles to families. The new public roadway, “A” Street, will provide access to the neighborhood and a connection to both Dune Palms Road to the west and the adjacent Komar/Costco Center to the east. Pedestrian paths will traverse the residential community facilitating easy access to Dune Palms Road, Highway 111, and neighboring commercial developments. The A commercial or mixed/use portion will provide up to 82,000 square feet of automobile sales and related uses and be constructed on the northern portion of the site, meeting design standards of the City as well as the corporate images of the future users. The development is envisioned to hold up to three automobile dealerships with associated service facilities. Vehicular access to the commercial portion will be provided at two entry points along Highway 111. The commercial development will also have access to “A” Street along its southern boundary. Both the commercial and residential components of the Project contribute towards satisfying the needs of La Quinta residents and are expected to be long-term assets to the community. 291 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 2 of 38 The Plan presents the vision of the Project and the associated guidelines necessary to see that vision through to implementation. Though a certain level of flexibility is provided, the standards established by the Plan will ensure that the Project meets or exceeds the expectations of the City and community at large. Development of the Project will be processed in accordance with the City’s development review and approval process as required by the LQMC. DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION The Plan has been organized into the following sections for clarity and easy reference as described below. 1.Introduction. Offers the project summary, scope, and objectives. 2.Setting. Description of existing conditions. 3.Land Use Plan. Identifies the land use regulations and development standards applicable to the Plan area. 4.Development Plan. Describes the general site plan, circulation, grading, utilities and phasing of the Project and establishes design guidelines for its architecture and landscaping. 5.Specific Plan Administration. Describes management of and changes to the Plan, as well as other administrative items. 6.Relationship to the La Quinta General Plan. Overview of how the Plan’s regulations, standards and guidelines support the General Plan’s goals, policies, and programs. 292 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 3 of 38 1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE This document is the Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan, which has been created to facilitate the development of a project in accordance with the La Quinta General Plan. The Plan establishes the design and development guidelines for the Project, so that it will enhance the existing community and provide vibrant new retail and living environments in the City. The Plan was written to facilitate the development of a 22-acre area, with commercial uses in the northern half and residential uses in the southern half. This document has been written pursuant to LQMC Section 9.240.010 and in compliance with LQMC Section 9.70.030, which requires that a specific plan be approved for developments larger than ten acres within the Regional Commercial zone1. The vision presented within this document depicts the quality and design desired at the site, is in accordance with the City’s established Zoning Code and General Plan, and conforms to the City’s overall objective of preserving, maintaining, and enhancing the high quality of life La Quinta residents enjoy. Although the Plan addresses the composition and quality of the Project, it also provides policy and regulatory provisions to guarantee consistency with existing City policies and standards. In cases where the zoning and development regulation is non-specific within this document, the zoning and development regulations shall be guided by the LQMC, particularly Title 9 – Zoning, that is in effect at the time. A degree of flexibility is incorporated to allow future development to respond to the changes in society and the economic marketplace, but consistency with other City documents and policies shall remain. The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency prepared the Plan so that it might expediently facilitate the construction of the Project, creating employment and housing opportunities, and ensuring a high-quality development. The Plan will be used to guide any and all development at the Project site. All development plans, parcel or tract maps, or other entitlements shall be consistent with the regulations of the Plan as well as all other applicable municipal regulations. 1.1.1 Enabling Legislation The authority to prepare, adopt, and implement the Plan is granted to the City by the California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457). As with General Plans, the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing before it can recommend to the City Council the adoption of a specific plan or an amendment thereto. The City Council may, following a public hearing, adopt a specific plan and/or amendment to the Plan by either ordinance or resolution. The Plan is a regulatory document that, once adopted by the City Council, will serve as the Developm ent Code for the Project. Upon completion of the specific plan adoption process, future development must be consistent with the Plan and amendments thereto. Topics and standards not addressed in the Plan shall be controlled by the General Plan and the LQMC. The northern portion of the site is within a Regional Commercial zone. 293 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 4 of 38 Figure 1: Project Aerial 1.2 HIGHWAY 111/DUNE PALMS PROPERTY AND LOCATION Approximately 22 acres in size, the Project site is located in the City of La Quinta on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 300 feet east of Dune Palms Road. It is generally rectangular in shape, measuring about 662 feet from east to west and 1,291 feet north to south. At the southern end, there is a slight “panhandle” that extends about 260 feet west to connect to Dune Palms Road. The site is bounded on the north by Highway 111 and on the south by the DSUSD administration and service facilities, which includes a school bus lot. Directly to the east is an existing commercial development (the Komar/Costco Center) and to the west lies Dune Palms Road, existing office development, an existing mini-storage facility, and a service station. On the opposite side of Dune Palms Road is another commercial development, anchored by Sam’s Club. An aerial photo of the subject property and its surroundings is provided in Figure 1 below. 294 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 5 of 38 1.3 OWNERSHIP The subject property consists primarily of parcel numbers 600-020-04, 600-020-05, and 600020- 11 which are currently owned by the Agency, though they will be sold to private owners in the future. Figure 2 shows the parcel map for the Project site 1. Figure 2: Specific Plan Area Parcel Map 1.4 SITE HISTORY Up until the 1940’s, the site was undeveloped for urban uses, at which point the eastern half of the site was converted to agricultural uses with two accessory structures, likely water tanks3. The agricultural uses were terminated prior to 1974, at which point a trailer park, including a pool and two permanent structures, was operational in the northeastern section of the site. However, by 1980, residential occupancy at the trailer park had dwindled, with only a dozen or so trailers remaining. This minimal population remained until the early 2000’s, when the final trailers vacated the site and all remaining structures were removed. The Agency purchased the property in 2007 facilitate the development of affordable housing and infill commercial development, both of which are identified as goals in the adopted Redevelopment Plan. 1 Lot Line Adjustment Number 09-501 was approved by the City Planning Department on October 6, 2009 and submitted to the County of Riverside for recording. 3 The history of the site was established through the review of aerial photographs, as a part of the environmental site assessment performed by Earth Systems Southwest. Project Site Source: Nolte Associates, Inc. 295 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 6 of 38 1.5 OVERVIEW Development of the site will be comprised of two components, an auto sales oriented commercial retail or mixed-use development on the northern 10 acres, and an affordable housing development on the southern 10 acres with up to 200 units. The commercial portion is envisioned as the location for up to three branded 2 automobile dealerships, potentially with associated service centers, a variety of commercial uses with option for mixed-use development, including a branded hotel. Automotive sales and service is Commercial uses are a natural extension of other developments along Highway 111, the City’s primary commercial corridor. With automotive sales and service for luxury vehicles being limited in La Quinta and the eastern segment of the Coachella Valley in general, this location will allow automobile owners to receive service without having to commute to the western end of the Valley and beyond. Automotive sales and service and a hotel are not the only commercial use permitted by the Plan, however, other commercial uses may require additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). In addition to the automobile/commercial component, the Plan further provides a unique opportunity to increase the supply of affordable housing in the city - most importantly meeting the needs of current and future residents, but also allowing La Quinta to continue to be a leader in affordable workforce housing. The location of the affordable housing development south of the commercial component provides insulation from Highway 111, while offering a wide range of services and job opportunities within a short walking distance. The new community will be available to very low- and low-income individuals and families, and may include some units affordable to moderate-income residents as well. The City and the Agency both support diversification of housing types, and continue to pursue their respective goals of fulfilling the City’s share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation and meeting the requirements of California Community Redevelopment Law, while maintaining the high quality of life La Quinta residents enjoy. As a part of the Project, a new public roadway, “A” Street, will be constructed, which will intersect Dune Palms Road at the southern end of the site and traverse east/west between the commercial and residential portions, ending at the neighboring Komar/Costco site. The commercial portion of Project will be conveniently accessed directly from Highway 111 with secondary access from “A” Street, while access to the residential portion will be via “A” Street. The land use plan and “A” Street alignment are shown in the following Figure 3. 2 Term “branded” refers to a dealership being associated with a single vehicle manufacturer such as BMW or Honda, not independent retailers of a variety of cars. 296 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 7 of 38 Figure 3: Conceptual Project Land Use Plan The Project, and specifically the construction of “A” Street, will require the realignment and reconstruction of the access driveway to the DSUSD service facility, located directly south of the Project site. This driveway is the only entrance to the District’s bus yard, which is used by busses and staff vehicles, and not the general public. The existing driveway will be replaced by the signalized “A” Street intersection at Dune Palms Road. A variety of DSUSD activities will be served by this access point. The District’s maintenance function, to include a number of service vehicles, is located there. In addition, commissary or food service distribution functions are at 297 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 8 of 38 the location. Lastly, bus storage and maintenance takes place immediately south of the residential area. Part of the daily maintenance routine is a pre-travel safety check which includes testing lights and horns. Noise from the safety tests creates a significant design constraint for the nearby residential buildings; however, mitigation measures will be implemented to ensure interior noise levels comply with existing City standards. The conceptual realignment of the access driveway to accommodate both DSUSD vehicles as well as “A” Street traffic may require the acquisition of a small portion (approximately 7,000 square feet) of the adjacent mini-storage lot. This portion of the lot is currently used as a retention basin, which will be relocated south of the access driveway. 1.5.1 Associated Activities The Project will likely necessitate some modifications or improvements to property outside of the geographic boundary of the Project. One off-site impact of the Project is the possible extension of a storm water drainage improvement from the southeastern corner of the site to an outfall structure to be built in the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The drainage pipeline would cut through a portion of the DSUSD site that is currently used as a retention basin. However, it is anticipated DSUSD could utilize an outfall for drainage also, potentially allowing redevelopment of areas currently dedicated to storm water retention. Drainage to the Evacuation Channel may be done via one or two pipelines, depending upon the best engineering and design options for the Project and the DSUSD property. Construction of this improvement could allow storm water from the Project site, and potentially the DSUSD property, to drain directly into the Evacuation Channel following onsite treatment of the “first flush” flow as required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit. Alternatively, storm water may be retained and treated onsite through a series of best management practices (“BMPs”) which may include: Dry wells, Detention/retention basins, Catch/debris basins, and  Other BMPs as needed. It should be noted that onsite treatment of first flush flows will be required regardless of whether drainage directly to the Evacuation Channel is established. A preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been prepared for this Project. Other off-site improvements include modifications to the DSUSD bus barn and storage yard and potential modifications to the Komar/Costco site parking lot to facilitate pedestrian traffic accessing the development via “A” Street. Proposed improvements to the DSUSD property include construction of a sound wall and improved circulation and ingress and egress. Proposed adjustments to the Komar/Costco parking lot include clear markings for delineation of traffic flow and pedestrian access to and from “A” Street. This may be done using additional landscaped curbs and a well marked walkway leading east from the point where “A” Street terminates at the Komar/Costco parking lot. 298 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 9 of 38 1.6 OBJECTIVES As the preparer of the Plan, the Agency has identified the following objectives, as well as those of the City. La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Objectives: Ameliorate blighted conditions Increase economic vitality Promote job creation, private investment, and other positive economic indicators Increase the supply of affordable housing within the Redevelopment Project Area Develop a safe, vibrant housing community available to a range of singles and families at affordable rates City of La Quinta Objectives: Ensure high-quality development that is consistent with the existing regional character and design standards Ensure adequate infrastructure and public services Enhance compatible uses along Highway 111, a major commercial corridor Encourage infill development Promote land uses featuring sustainable practices Mitigate impacts to the highest degree feasible Diversify the housing types available to residents Meet Regional Housing Needs Assessment goals The Project facilitated by the Plan contributes to meeting each of these objectives by ensuring high quality standards are in place, while guiding the development types through the series of development standards found in this document, the General Plan, and the LQMC. Further discussion on development standards is provided in Section 3 of the Plan, and information on how the Plan will foster a project meeting the General Plan’s goals, policies, and programs is provided in Section 6. 299 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 10 of 38 SECTION 2: SETTING The following section provides an overview of the land uses in the surrounding area, as well as existing standards and provisions that apply to the property. In particular, this section describes how the Project site is defined by the existing regulations as set forth in the General Plan and LQMC. 2.1 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ENVIRONMENT The Project site is situated along the south side of Highway 111, the City’s primary commercial corridor and a well traveled route, providing access to many Coachella Valley communities. Highway 111 features a wide range of commercial uses including offices, retail, services, and restaurants, and is a vital component of the City’s municipal revenues. The Komar/Costco site directly to the east of the Project site features retail, service, and restaurant uses, as does the Sam’s Club development on the western side of Dune Palms Road. Several automotive dealerships are also located along Highway 111, making the northern portion of the site an ideal spot to expand the types of automotive sales featured within La Quinta. The residential development on the southern portion of the site will be buffered from Highway 111 by the commercial component and from Dune Palms Road by the existing storage buildings. The DSUSD administrative facility directly to the south of the proposed apartments is an institutional use, which is active during the day, offering a quieter evening environment. This urban location provides residents with employment, retail, and restaurant opportunities within walking distance, and puts them within convenient proximity of a public transportation network provided by SunLine Transit. Nearby infrastructure is in place, including regional flood control facilities. The La Quinta Evacuation Channel is located southeast of the Project, running adjacent to the DSUSD site. Adjacent arterial roadways are largely developed, with full street improvements in place along both Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. The new “A” Street will provide convenient access to the residential community from Dune Palms Road, and will also allow for vehicular and pedestrian access to the Komar/Costco site so that community residents may easily patronize the retail and restaurant establishments. In both the commercial and residential developments, design guidelines and the project approval process will ensure that the built environments created are not only compatible with surrounding land uses but also functional with attractive aesthetics. This will be particularly important for the residential component, which must rely on design and architecture to provide a sense of community within the urban atmosphere; but as discussed, the proximity of the development to convenient employment and retail opportunities will be a great asset to future residents. 2.2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND ZONING ISSUES The Project site has General Plan land use designations of Regional Commercial (RC) in the northern portion and Commercial Park (CP) in the southern portion. Its zoning designations are Regional Commercial (CR) on the northern portion and Commercial Park (CP) in the southern portion, as shown in the following Figure 4. 300 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 11 of 38 Figure 4: Land Use and Zoning Designations The General Plan RC designation of the northern portion of the site permits a range of commercial uses, as does the underlying CR zoning. LQMC Section 9.70.030 specifically lists automobile oriented sales and service as a representative land use in the CR District, making this use particularly well suited to the site. The affordable housing land use proposed for the southern portion is a permitted use (LQMC Section 9.80.040) and subject to the City’s density bonuses for affordable housing provisions (LQMC Section 9.60.270) which includes provisions for relief from certain development standards including density limits. The density for the residential portion of the Project site is based upon the underlying High Density Residential (RH) zoning, which allows up to 16 units per acre, combined with the 35% density bonus provided for in LQMC Section 9.60.270, resulting in a maximum potential build-out of 216 units for the approximately 10 acres. The Plan, in consideration of the Project site’s physical characteristics reduces this number to a maximum of 200 dwelling units. Project General Plan Designations Project Zoning Designations 301 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 12 of 38 5 SECTION 3: LAND USE PLAN 3.1 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Commercial Purpose: To serve unmet local consumer need and augment the community’s economy through encouraging the development and preservation of a high quality automobile sales and service related commercial area. Intent: To encourage a commercial or mixed-use automotive sales development in the northern portion of the Plan area that is compatible with the surrounding uses along Highway 111. To achieve this, development of the site is to be integrated into the existing commercial environment by utilizing high quality design features, architecture, and landscaping that meets or exceeds all applicable standards. To ensure compatibility between the commercial and residential portions of the Plan, as well as with the intensity of the surrounding properties the total amount of allowable commercial building area is capped at a maximum of 82,000 square feet. This development envelope is smaller than the site’s potential footprint based on its current zoning. While there is a limit to the amount of floor area that can be built, in order to facilitate creativity and encourage design flexibility, there is no limit to the number or configuration of buildings that may be constructed, as long as all applicable regulations are adhered to. To present a cohesive and attractive development, all buildings, parking areas, and landscaping will be well integrated into the site and shall meet the City’s applicable Highway 111 DesignGuidelines5. Commercial or mixed-use development would activate The commercial developments would activate Highway 111 and provide visual relief between Highway 111. Parking areas and buildings will have lighting features appropriate for the design of the development while providing for public safety. Fencing may be used to separate the commercial component from surrounding uses as needed. Landscaping will feature native plants, and provide a pleasing visual character on this well-traveled corridor. Residential Purpose: To enhance the variety and availability of affordable housing units within the City and thus assist the City and Agency in meeting the General Plan’s Housing Element Goals and the Agency’s Housing Implementation Plan requirements. Intent: To facilitate the development and preservation of a high density residential community, consisting of up to 200 multi-family dwelling units and associated open space, and recreational and community facilities. Towards this, the residential portion of the site is intended to be developed with affordable rental multi-family residences. Units may range from one to three bedrooms, and be up to three stories in design. Ultimately, the site plan may feature any number of residential buildings to best meet the needs of the community while making efficient use of the available land. The actual design of the project will be reviewed for compliance with the use and development standards of the Plan through the processing of a site development permit development. The characteristics of a residential development consistent with the Plan should include a pleasant residential environment that features a community clubhouse, swimming pool and connected open space with pedestrian walkways to encourage outdoor activities and safe pedestrian travel within the community. Additional recreational amenities may include tot lots, benches, and barbeques. The development should be predominately landscaped with regional 302 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 13 of 38 native plants, but may include limited designated turf areas for recreational use. Lighting features should be integrated into the entire site for safety and aesthetic purposes. City of La Quinta, Highway 111 Design Theme, October 1997. 3.2 LAND USE REGULATIONS The following sections discuss the development parameters applicable within the Plan area. These standards ensure that the overall vision for the Plan is maintained irrespective of the individual developers and users of the site. Section 3.2.1 contains the allowed uses and permitting regulations for the two land use designations used in the Plan. These regulations establish the uses permitted within the commercial and the residential portions of the Plan. Section 3.2.2 contains the development standards for the two land use designations. These standards address the location and design of the buildings, landscape, and amenities within each land use designated area. Any land use regulations or development standards not specifically addressed in the Plan shall be governed by Title 9 of the LQMC. 3.2.1 Allowed Uses and Permitting Regulations Commercial Uses permitted in the area of the Plan designated Commercial are as listed under Regional Commercial (CR) in Table 9-5 of LQMC Section 9.80.040 subject to the following exceptions: Sales and service of new motor vehicles at a branded dealership is a permitted use. Sales and service of branded pre-owned motor vehicles associated with an on-site branded dealership is a permitted use (minor incidental sale of non-branded pre-owned vehicles of similar class is permitted). Sales and service of pre-owned motor vehicles not associated with an on-site branded dealership is permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Static display of vehicles, associated with a permitted branded or non-branded dealership, at grade within a front landscape setback so long as no signage, banners, lights, balloons or other visible devices are used is permitted subject to approval of a minor use permit. Vehicle display areas shall not be allowed within the public right-of way. Specific locations and conditions of use shall be addressed through the site development permit and minor use permit approval procedures. Note: Uses other than automobile sales may require additional environmental review per the California Environmental Quality Act. Residential Uses permitted in the area of the Plan designated Residential are as listed under High Density Residential (RH) District in Table 9-1 of LQMC Section 9.40.040. Note: Uses other than multi-family dwelling units may require additional environmental review per the California Environmental Quality Act. 303 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 14 of 38 3.2.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Commercial Development standards for the area of the Plan designated Commercial are those applicable to the Regional Commercial (CR) District contained in LQMC Chapter 9.90, parking regulations in Chapter 9.150 and all other supplemental non-residential development standards as set forth in the LQMC, subject to the following exception: The total amount of commercial building square footage shall not exceed 82,000 square feet gross floor area. Buildings at the subject site are exempt from the floor area ratio requirements of the underlying district. The maximum height shall be 60 feet throughout the commercial area, including within the first 150 feet from Highway 111 right of way. Vehicle display areas located within a front landscape setback shall be located south of the public sidewalk and a minimum 5 foot landscape separation shall be maintained between the sidewalk and the vehicle display area. Parking lots and drive aisles are allowed to be constructed within the landscape setback, between the landscaped area and building. Residential Development standards for the area of the Plan designated Commercial are those applicable to the High Density Residential (RH) District contained in LQMC Chapter 9.50, the density bonuses for affordable housing provisions contained in LQMC Section 9.60.270 and all other applicable supplemental residential development standards as set forth in the LQMC, subject to the following exceptions: Dwelling unit count shall not exceed 200. Residential buildings shall not exceed a maximum total of 235,000 square feet, including community facilities consisting of a pool area and community center. The minimum living area per residential unit shall be 700 square feet. Minimum of 5 feet setback where residential is adjacent to non-residential and does not abut a roadway. The maximum fence height may be allowed to exceed the standard as set forth in the LQMC where residential is adjacent to non-residential when recommended by a noise attenuation study and approved by the Planning Director. The following minimum parking ratios, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, shall apply unless alternative parking standards are approved in accordance with LQMC Chapter 9.150: 1.5 parking spaces/unit + .5 guest space/unit 1 space/employee for non-residential services and/or activities These standards may be adjusted by up to 10% through the Site Development Permit approval process. 304 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 15 of 38 If the total number of spaces required results in a fractional number, it shall be rounded up to the next whole number. SECTION 4: DEVELOPMENT PLAN This section addresses the backbone elements of the project including circulation, site grading, drainage, and flood control. It also identifies the primary utility and service providers and lists guidelines for the architectural and landscaping design of the Project as well as sustainability and other environmentally related measures to be incorporated. To implement the Plan, certain discretionary permits (site development permits, conditional use permits, and/or minor use permits) will be required. These permits will translate the standards and guidelines of the Plan to the features that, once approved, will be constructed and ultimately implement the Plan. It is at this stage of the planning process that decision makers will be able to ensure that the residential and the auto/commercial/mixed-use components of the Project are compatible with each other as well as with the surrounding community. 4.1 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The following subsections are meant to augment the overall vision of the Project to ensure the most cohesive and attractive possible developments. 4.1.1 Fencing and Walls Except as noted in Section 3.2.2 (Development Standards), all fencing and walls shall comply with existing LQMC standards. The appearance and/or style of the walls utilized within the Project should reflect the following qualities: Interior walls separating patios will be stucco or masonry. Walls separating recreational facilities from other segments of the development will consist of wrought iron fencing and/or masonry. Perimeter fencing may be masonry, but may feature wrought iron with stucco pilasters. If proposed, fencing for the automobile/commercial/mixed-use component should be designed to reflect the broader themes of that part of the development, and integrate with the surrounding environment. 4.1.2 Site Lighting All lighting shall comply with the existing LQMC standards. All lighting shall be designed and located so as to confine and direct light within the Project boundaries, which includes the landscape buffer areas located along the street frontages. Lighting for the project shall be consistent with lower lighting levels wherever practical. The Plan envisions lighting designs that incorporate features and fixtures such as the following, or alternatives that lead to equivalent lighting patterns: Buildings and Open Spaces: All poles should be of a decorative or non-glossy finish, utilizing paint powder coating or an anodized surface. 305 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 16 of 38 Lighting fixtures should be designed to achieve ideal light distribution and minimize point source glare. Commercial area lighting shall be designed to go to a security level lighting after business hours. Fixtures should be mounted precisely to prevent glare from tilted fixtures. All building-mounted lights shall be partially or fully shielded as applicable to Section 9.100.150 of the LQMC, including but not limited to patio, balcony, securing, and entry door lights. All lights on the second and third floors should have extended drop shields so the light source cannot be seen from any public streets. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be required along Highway 111 per the City’s approved Highway 111 Design Standards and should also be required on all pathways and in proximity to all community facilities. Parking Areas: Lighting for parking lot areas should be LED or high pressure sodium fixtures mounted on steel poles, finished as stated above. The maximum height for any light source shall be 22 feet above finished grade in the commercial component or 16 feet in the residential component. All lenses should be of a flush design. Parking area lighting shall also be shielded so as to minimize impacts to residential units. 4.1.3 Circulation The Project is easily accessed from two arterial thoroughfares - Dune Palms Road to the west, and Highway 111 to the north. Points of access for the commercial component should come directly from driveway entrances along Highway 111, with the primary entry generally centered on the northern property line. General Plan Exhibit 3.1 depicts the roadway build-out designations and typical cross sections for arterials. Highway 111 is identified as a Major Arterial, and has been improved to 6 lanes along the project frontage. Dune Palms Road is designated as a Primary Arterial and has been improved to 4 lanes along the project frontage. Secondary access points should be located near the northeastern corner of the site in the commercial portion along Highway 111, as well as at the midway point along the western Project border, connecting the Project to Dune Palms Road via the adjacent office development. The latter access point is anticipated to provide limited access for emergency and service vehicles, and will not be utilized by the general public. Primary access to the residential component should be via the new signalized intersection on Dune Palms Road and “A” Street that leads traffic through the Project site and ultimately connects to the Komar/Costco center to the east. The commercial component would also have access to “A” Street from its southern property line. Lastly, a connection to the DSUSD facility to the south provides access primarily for school busses, delivery vehicles, and employee vehicles from that facility to “A” Street and hence to the arterial system at the signalized intersection on Dune Palms Road. This connection 306 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 17 of 38 replaces the current driveway used by DSUSD that accesses Dune Palms Road at a nonsignalized intersection immediately south of the Project. The vehicular circulation is illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5: Conceptual Vehicular Circulation Source: Prest Vuksic Architects 4.1.3.1 Entries to the Project Site The residential community’s primary entrance is from Dune Palms Road via the proposed “A” Street, which will run along the western and northern sides of the Project. Adequate stacking space will be provided for entering and exiting traffic, coordinating well with the site’s internal circulation system. “A” Street will be a two-lane road with turning lanes angled to align with an entry point to a neighboring commercial center (Sam’s Club) on the western side of Dune Palms Road and will align with an existing driveway within the Costco/Komar commercial development to the east. A signalized intersection at Dune Palms Road will allow for left- and right-in, as well as left- and right-turns out. The main entry is further designed to accommodate the turning radii and maneuvering capabilities of the DSUSD busses and delivery trucks that will utilize the new signalized entryway. Upon entering the Project site, busses and other DSUSD staff traffic will 307 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 18 of 38 proceed straight ahead while those wishing to travel along “A” Street or enter the residential development will turn left as shown in Figure 6. 308 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 19 of 38 Figure 6: Conceptual Entrance from Dune Palms Road Source: NGA Architecture The main entry for the commercial portion of the Plan is a right-in, right-out access via Highway 111. The secondary entry point is to be located further east on Highway 111 and will also be a right-in, right-out access. A third entry point is proposed off of “A” Street near the Costco/Komar development. Finally, a fourth entry point intended for emergency and service vehicles only is located north of the adjacent mini storage facility providing access between Dune Palms Road and the southwest corner of the auto/commercial/mixed-use component. 4.1.3.2 On-Site Circulation System The proposed “A” Street is the primary circulation connection within the Project, providing primary access to the residential component. The commercial component, DSUSD, and the neighboring commercial development can also be accessed via “A” Street. Both the commercial and residential developments will have internal accessways that circumnavigate the parcels, providing access to parking and links to “A” Street. The primary interior drives will be a minimum of 26 feet in width. A benefit of the site’s location is the close proximity to a number of shopping and employment opportunities and public transit. This factor reduces the need for residents to commute long distances for jobs, services, and shopping opportunities. Public transit is available nearby with existing stops located near the intersection of Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. Pedestrian access routes will be located along the eastern property line of the auto/commercial/mixed-use component that will extend from Highway 111 south to “A” Street, and along “A” Street to provide access to the adjacent retail establishments and Highway 111, as shown in Figure 7. Within the Project, design concepts and delineated pathways should ensure a secure relationship between automobile traffic and pedestrians. Sidewalks and pedestrian paths will allow for safe, 309 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 20 of 38 easy pedestrian travel throughout the project, as well as provide convenient access to Dune Palms Road, the Costco/Komar Center and Highway 111. Figure 7 below depicts pedestrian access and circulation. Source: Prest Vuksic Architects 4.1.3.3 Streetscape Treatment Streetscape treatments on Highway 111, Dune Palms Road and “A” Street will be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and water efficient, with drought-tolerant planting types described further in Section 4.9 of this Plan. Streetscapes will consist of walkways consistent with the surrounding sidewalks, featuring drought tolerant planting beds to showcase water efficiency and quality landscape design along the arterials. Where applicable, such as on Highway 111, all other City landscaping standards shall apply. The internal streetscape along “A” Street will feature sidewalks and drought tolerant landscaping that integrates with the residential and commercial developments. As discussed in Section 3.2.1 of the Plan, additional streetscape features may be incorporated with the development of the auto dealerships along Highway 111; such as ground-level display pads shall be permitted in the Highway 111 landscape setback area on which for-sale vehicles, but no advertising devices, may be parked for greater visibility. Their specific locations shall be established in the appropriate discretionary permit and will be carefully integrated with the walkway and adjacent landscaping materials. Figure 7: Conceptual Pedestrian Circulation 310 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 21 of 38 4.2 PHASING It is expected that the project will be built in two phases. The multi-family residential component is expected to be constructed in the first phase, along with most, if not all, of the off -site improvements, including the storm water drainage system, which may include the outfall structure(s) into the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Concurrent with the residential construction, it is anticipated that two limited automobile dealerships will be developed on the commercial portion of the site. During the first phase, the dealerships will provide service facilities and the sale of vehicles, possibly only certified pre-owned vehicles initially. Commercial or mixed-use developments A third dealership will likely be built in the second phase, and all three dealerships will be expanded to include the sales of both new and certified pre-owned vehicles. Construction of the first phase is expected to begin in 2010. No date has been established for the construction of the second phase, although it is estimated to begin approximately 59 years after the phase one dealerships have begun operating. Final Phasing Plans will be part of future Site Development Permits. “A” Street will be constructed to its ultimate configuration during Phase 1. 4.3 SITE GRADING The existing terrain at the Project site is relatively flat with a small mound approximately 20 feet above the surrounding terrain in the northeast quadrant of the property. The elevation difference from the high point (+/- 76 feet) to the low point (+/- 52 feet) is approximately 25 feet. It is anticipated that the entire site will be rough-graded at the onset of construction. The overall height of the site will be very slightly raised in order to minimize the impacts of the Project on neighboring uses. As a result, approximately 1,200 cubic yards of soil will be imported. The Project area will be graded so that the general hydrological flow is to the southeast. As discussed, the City is anticipating an off-site improvement which would involve an underground conveyance system to bring storm water runoff from the Project site to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. It is anticipated that Project drainage can be discharged directly into the nearby evacuation channel via this underground conveyance system. One or more dry wells and/or small retention basins shall be included in the site design to prevent nuisance water from entering the Evacuation Channel. Other on-site facilities will ensure that appropriate water quality standards are met. Should the connection to the Evacuation Channel not be constructed, on-site retention of storm flows shall be utilized. A grading plan will be performed for the Project that identifies proposed land uses within the site boundary, preliminary pad locations and elevations, contours, and retention/detention basin locations as needed. 4.4 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL / PM10 The Coachella Valley experiences periods of moderate to high wind conditions. Therefore, wind blown dust and sand are a concern during local grading operations. The South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Environmental Protection Agency have instituted a plan in the Coachella Valley to reduce excess PM 10 (small particle dust). These provisions must be adhered to during grading operations. All standard City of La Quinta mitigation measures and conditions of approval will be utilized to ensure that there is adequate PM 10 control in place. 311 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 22 of 38 4.5 STORMWATER In general, methods for filtration and removal of sediments, waste, oils and grease will be consistent with all local, State and federal requirements. Given the nature of the use, project design features for the auto dealer commercial/mixed-use uses will be an important part of discretionary permits. The provisions of the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land apply to construction projects over 1 acre in size. Since the development site is over 20 acres, a Notice of Intent (“N.O.I.”) and NPDES permit containing a Best Management Practices Plan must be prepared and filed. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) must also be prepared for the development and submitted to the City of La Quinta. Erosion control will be addressed in the SWPPP. The NPDES Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System for the White Water River Region contains requirements for residential and commercial developments that may discharge or affect storm water runoff in the White Water River Basin. Among other things, these requirements oblige developers of new projects or redevelopment of “priority projects” to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”). This Project meets the requirements established; therefore a WQMP will be prepared. 4.6 DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL The following guidelines shall be used to implement a drainage and flood control plan. 4.6.1 Hydrology The Plan area is covered by Flood Insurance Rate Map 06065C2234G revised August 28, 2008, which shows that the Project area is designated as Zone X, shaded and unshaded. Zone X unshaded indicates that it lies outside the 500-year flood plain. Zone X shaded indicates areas of 500-year flood. Off-site flows tributary to the site area have been intercepted and retained by adjacent development and are considered negligible. 4.6.2 Regional Flood Control The storm water drainage system in the City of La Quinta is administered by the Coachella Valley Water District (“CVWD”). Generally speaking, the regional storm water drainage system consists of improvements to the major natural drainage channels that run through the City. The Project will include facilities to convey runoff from the 100-year storm event to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel via underground pipes, or the Project will retain runoff in facilities located on the site. 4.6.3 Temporary Measures The drainage plan proposes to temporarily direct surface runoff via graded swales to two or more retention basins during the development of the site and between construction phases for the automotive/commercial part of the Project. 4.6.4 Permanent Measures Drainage facilities will be provided within the private streets on the property, and/or through naturalized drainage courses, leading to either a major storm drain connecting to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel or to on-site retention facilities. Facilities will be sized to accommodate 100- year storm flows, consistent with City standards. 312 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 23 of 38 4.6.5 Nuisance Water A minimal amount of nuisance water is expected due to the use of drought-tolerant landscaping where practical, and technologically advanced efficient irrigation systems. The overall drainage plan will collect and convey all nuisance water into one or more dry well collection points or small retention basins. These facilities will allow the nuisance water to be treated as necessary and to percolate or evaporate, avoiding discharge to the Evacuation Channel. 4.7 UTILITIES The utilities infrastructure that will serve the development is described below and is designed to provide a coordinated system of infrastructure and public services to adequately serve the project at full build out. This section identifies standards relative to land use for the site and establishes the infrastructure and public service policies. 4.7.1 Sewer Plan The Project is located within the jurisdiction of CVWD for sewer service. An existing 10-inch sewer main is located within the Dune Palms Road right-of-way, and an 18-inch main is located within the southern portion of the Highway 111 right-of-way. Service connection is proposed at the northeast corner of the Project, connecting to the 18-inch main in Highway 111. Sewage lines will be provided throughout the site as needed for adequate capacity. 4.7.2 Potable Water Plan The development is located within the jurisdiction of the CVWD for water service. Existing 18inch water mains are located within both Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 rights-of-way. A main line will be installed on site, with service connection provided at the northeast corner of the Project, in Highway 111. 4.7.3 Electrical Plan Electric service is provided to the site by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). All electrical facilities will be underground. Distribution lines are located along the east and west property lines. The available connections distribute 12,500 volts. Connections are expected to be from existing service points. Service to the development is expected to be routine. 4.7.4 Natural Gas Natural gas service is provided to the site by The Gas Company. A 4-inch main is located within the north side of the Highway 111 right-of-way, and a second 4-inch main is located within the west side of Dune Palms Road right-of-way. The point of connection is available anywhere along the Project’s frontage. Service to the development is assumed to be routine. 4.7.5 Telephone Telephone service will be provided to the development by Verizon. The point of connection is located within the Highway 111 right-of-way, where an existing underground line is located on the north side. Service to the development is assumed to be routine. 4.7.6 Cable Television Cable television service will be provided to the site by Time Warner. Underground lines exist along both Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. Service to the development is assumed to be routine. 313 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 24 of 38 4.8 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL THEME The design and architectural themes for the Project components have yet to be determined, though they should generally follow the guidelines described below. The interpretation, flexibility, including potential alternative design concepts, and incorporation of these guidelines into the building design process shall be through the City’s Site and Architectural Design Review procedures. 4.8.1 Auto/Commercial/ Mixed-Use As described, permitted uses in the commercial/mixed-use part of the Project emphasize varying commercial uses, including, but not limited to automotive sales and service, specifically branded vehicle dealerships, and a hotel. The general architectural theme of these facilities should reflect a sophisticated, technical atmosphere. Specifically, the design of the commercial/ mixed-use buildings automobile sales and service facilities may be based upon corporate motifs employed by the brands represented, although all design work should be of high quality that blends well visually with surrounding uses on Highway 111 and provides visual relief from Highway 111. Characteristics may include: Clean, bright colors, particularly whites and silvers, and use of glass Use of geometric lines and angles in facades “Engineered” look to complement vehicles Figure 8 provides a sampling of branded dealership design that may be similar to the Project. Figure 8: Sample Designs of Branded Auto Dealerships Materials and colors used should integrate with the overall appearance of Highway 111, while allowing the user to incorporate necessary brand recognition strategies. 4.8.2 Residential The buildings constructed on the site should generally have a Desert Modern/Contemporary character, and maintain a consistent theme carried out by quality materials and imaginative design that will complement the existing character of La Quinta. A simple yet strong architectural vocabulary that will rely on strategically placed key details and the careful selection of landscape materials should define the aesthetics of the development. Architectural details may include balconies, recessed openings, low walls, courtyards, and awnings. Other salient characteristics of the architectural character may include features such as: Architectural design that is unique in character, but consistent with surrounding area; 314 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 25 of 38 The use of articulated facades with balconies and patio areas; Shaded walkways and sunscreen eyebrows; Building integration with drought tolerant landscaping, such that the architecture appears as an extension and outgrowth of the landscape; Site planning and building designs that should be sensitive to views, privacy, adjacent developments, and a coherent, multi-modal circulation network; and Mechanical elements of the buildings will be screened from view by walls, fences or landscaping. Selected materials and color palettes should complement the overall design of the community and integrate with the neighboring developments to the highest degree feasible. 4.9 LANDSCAPING The landscape concept follows functionality, emphasizing water efficient materials coupled with technologically advanced methods for ensuring the most efficient application of irrigation. Some interior spaces, primarily open space portions of the residential community, will include some turf landscaping for recreational purposes. Interior streetscapes may also incorporate a street tree program to provide shade for pedestrians and contribute to the overall feel of the community. Other portions of the site will incorporate drought-tolerant plant types consistent with Coachella Valley Water District guidelines. Irrigation of all landscaping shall be carefully monitored to ensure water use efficiency. 4.9.1 Landscaping Guidelines Landscape plans shall be approved through the City’s site development permit process. Landscaping features may include: Native/drought tolerant plants and  Turf in limited areas trees Trellising of climbing flora Accessories to landscaping and open space design may include: Benches Shade structures Barbeques Screening walls Meandering walkways/paths Tot lots/play equipment In addition to the plant palette and other allowable landscaping fixtures, the Project shall be designed to be consistent with the City’s Water Efficiency Ordinance (LQMC 8.13) and incorporate the following features. Ground cover should be used to protect soil from erosion, including gravels, rocks, or plant materials. Plant materials should be located and designed to avoid interfering with motorist sightlines. A variety of plant and groundcover colors, heights, and textures should be used to provide visual stimulation. 315 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 26 of 38 Landscaping along Highway 111 should integrate with adjacent frontages and conform to specific City guidelines (Highway 111 Design Guidelines) to provide continuity. Utility equipment and trash containers should be screened from view. 4.10 EFFICIENCY MEASURES Internal as well as exterior building designs and construction practices shall be guided by the desire for long term energy efficiency to the highest degree feasible. Efficiency measures associated with site design or building fixtures should enhance the appearance of the community and integrate with the architecture. The Project shall utilize design, construction, and operational measures to achieve the intent of the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards or comparable industry standards for new construction. Such measures should include: Exceeding the California Code of Regulations Title 24 requirements at the time of building permit issuance by 20% Energy efficient appliances and energy saving light bulbs Water efficient appliances and other water conservation techniques Drought tolerant landscaping as discussed above, along with efficient irrigation methods Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions Features to encourage alternative forms of transportation such as: Easy and safe pedestrian access to neighboring developments and public transportation Bicycle racks SECTION 5: SPECIFIC PLAN ADMINISTRATION The Plan is intended to be predominantly a policy document, though it does serve certain regulatory functions with respect to permitted uses and development standards. As such, administration of the Plan shall be guided by the following information. 5.1 ADMINISTRATION The City shall administer the provisions of the Plan in accordance with the Government Code, the Subdivision Map Act, the City General Plan and the LQMC. The City Planning Department shall oversee and enforce the site development standards and design guidelines set forth by this document. Any administrative interpretation of the Plan may be appealed to the Planning Commission. Any decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications contained in the Plan shall supersede the relevant provisions of the LQMC, as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Any development regulation or building requirement not addressed in the Plan shall be subject to all relevant City ordinances, codes and regulations. 5.2 DEVIATIONS/AMENDMENTS Any changes to this document, or to projects considered for entitlement pursuant to this document, shall be reviewed to see if they require an amendment to the Plan. If the Planning Director determines that the deviation (a) is minor, (b) will not result in a significant change to the projects as originally envisioned, and (c) is in 316 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 27 of 38 compliance with the spirit and intent of the Plan, the Director may approve the deviation, based on findings to that effect that shall be documented in the project file. Any amendment to the Plan shall be processed in accordance with Government Code Section 65453 and LQMC Section 9.240.010. 5.3 SEVERABILITY All regulations, conditions, and programs contained herein shall be deemed separate, distinct, and independent provisions of the Plan. In the event that any such provision is held invalid or unconstitutional, the validity of all the remaining provisions of the Plan shall not be affected. SECTION 6: RELATIONSHIP TO LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN POLICIES The following section identifies goals, policies, and programs in the La Quinta General Plan that are applicable to the Highway 111/Dune Palms Multi-use Project, followed by a response indicating compatibility and/or consistency. 6.1 LAND USE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 5: “All land use development proposals shall be consistent with all applicable land use policies and standards contained in the General Plan.” The Plan is consistent with the General Plan. 6.2 RESIDENTIAL GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 1: “The maintenance and protection of residential neighborhoods to assure that future housing needs are met.” The Plan proposes up to 200 units of housing to meet the City’s needs in accordance with the City’s 2009 Housing Element Update. Goal 2: “A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City.” The Plan proposes low-, very-low, and potentially moderate-income housing units. There are a limited number of high density multi-family housing units in La Quinta. The proposed development will provide additional units of this type and it is intended that these units will qualify toward the City’s 2008-2014 Regional Housing Allocation Number as recognized in the City’s 2009 Housing Element Update. Policy 2: “Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure.” Although the site is not immediately adjacent to residential neighborhoods, the Plan proposes building heights and site design to complement and be compatible with the surrounding areas. Infrastructure facilities are readily available to serve the site. Policy 5: “The City shall maintain residential development standards including setbacks, height, pad elevations and other design and performance standards which assure a high quality of development.” The proposed housing will meet all development standards as set forth by the City and identified in the Plan. 6.3 ADEQUATE HOUSING RESOURCE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 1: “Provision of a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of La Quinta”. 317 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 28 of 38 The proposed Project will create new housing opportunities for existing and future residents of La Quinta. In accordance with the City’s 2009 Housing Element Update, the units will qualify toward the City’s 2008-2014 Regional Housing Allocation. Program 1.4: “Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available.” The proposed Project is located within close proximity of employment opportunities, educational facilities and commercial support. Program 1.6: “Develop Medium, Medium High and High Density residential uses in the appropriate designations as well as in locations within the Mixed/Regional Commercial and Village Commercial designations that enhance creative site planning, promote the mixed-use concept where applicable, provide opportunities for affordable and/or employee housing, facilitate the efficient use of public facilities, and support alternative transit modes.” The proposed Project is High Density affordable housing and includes a community center with multiple uses. It is within walking distance of shopping, employment and transit service. Program 3.2: “Encourage a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments guided by Specific Plans, around the Village and within the Mixed/Regional Commercial area to enhance their people orientation and diversity through provision of incentives use of density transfer and density bonus provisions.” The Plan prepared for the Project is within a Regional Commercial area and provides high- density residential housing types. Program 3.6: “Apply shared parking provisions in mixed-use areas as a part of the Village Commercial and Mixed/Regional Commercial designation, and reduced parking requirements for assisted housing devoted to Low and Very Low income households, and/or seniors, as well as second units for seniors and the disabled where applicable.” The Plan allows for reduced parking requirements for low- and very low- income households. 6.4 AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 2: “A variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population.” The proposed Project accommodates very low-, low-, and potentially moderate-income levels. The units will qualify toward the City’s 2008-2014 Regional Housing Allocation Number as recognized in the City’s 2009 Housing Element Update. Program 1.3: “Continue to stimulate private developer and non-profit entity efforts in the development and financing of Low and Moderate income housing, utilizing the Redevelopment Set Aside Housing Fund or other resources available such as HOME funds, CHFA Single Family and Multi-Family programs; HUD Section 208/811 loans and HOPE II and III Homeownership programs to partially support the project. The City shall hold workshops and pre-development meetings with the prospective proponents of affordable housing to advertise the potential types of financial incentives available and the types of project characteristics considered for assistance, in addition to expanding their website to include a summary of available assistance programs and requirements”. 318 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 29 of 38 The project developer is an experienced developer of affordable housing and is familiar with available financial resources. The City has assisted the Project with the use of Redevelopment Housing Fund revenue. 319 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 30 of 38 6.5 HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS 3 Goal 1.1: “Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City’s existing and projected population.” The expansion of affordable housing will provide greater housing opportunities and options for residents consistent with the City’s 2009 Housing Element Update. Policy 1.2: “Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing.” The proposed residential development is within the existing boundaries. Policy 1.3: “Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available.” The Project location is near a major commercial corridor (Highway 111), and there are many employment opportunities and commercial support facilities. Goal 2.1: “Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing opportunities for lower and moderate income households.” The Agency’s and City’s assistance will result in a residential component that will be entirely affordable to very low-, low-, and potentially moderate-income households. Policy 2.2: “Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing.” The Agency and City have partnered with a private developer for the creation of the affordable residential community. Policy 6.1: “Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption.” The Plan facilitates up to 20 dwelling units per acre, minimizing certain impacts and land consumption. 6.6 COMMERCIAL GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Program 1.2: “The City will encourage an integration of a wide range of support services at employment centers, including child care, occupational health, fitness facilities and convenience retail shops.” The Plan allows for recreational facilities, and is located adjacent to a retail center offering employment opportunities. 6.7 OTHER LAND USE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 2: “The preservation of open space and recreational resources as a means of preserving and enhancing the quality of life and economic base of the City.” 3 City of La Quinta, General Plan Housing Element, State of California Department of Housing and Community Development Review Draft, August 12, 2009. 320 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 31 of 38 Open space will be a focal point of the residential development and include a variety of recreational opportunities. Program 3.3: “The City shall encourage the use of native landscaping and “links” golf courses which preserve natural open space areas.” The Plan includes a landscape palette that emphasizes native and other water efficient planting types. Policy 4: “The City shall continue to include park facilities planning in neighborhood planning efforts.” The Plan proposes facilities within the open space which may include a tot lot and pool to satisfy some of the recreation needs of the residents of the site. 6.8 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Program 2.3: “On Major Arterials, the minimum intersection spacing shall be 2,600 feet in residential areas, and may be 1,060 feet for commercial frontage. Intersection spacing may be reduced to 500 feet at the Whitewater Channel and La Quinta Evacuation Channel. The design speed shall be 60 miles per hour. Left turn median cuts may be authorized if turn pocket does not interfere with other existing or planned left turn pockets. Right in/right out access driveways shall exceed the following minimum separation distances (in all cases, distances shall be measured between the curb returns): more than 250 feet on the approach leg to a full turn intersection; more than 150 feet on the exit leg from a full turn intersection; more than 250 feet between driveways All access configurations shall require City Engineer review and approval.” The Plan recognizes Highway 111 to be a Major Arterial and Dune Palms Road to be a Primary Arterial. The Traffic Study identifies intersection design and spacing. Program 2.4: “On Primary Arterials, the minimum intersection spacing shall be 1,060 feet. The design speed shall be 50 mph. Left turn median cuts may be authorized if turn pocket does not interfere with other existing or planned left turn pockets. Right in/right out access driveways shall exceed the following minimum separation distances (in all cases, distances shall be measured between the curb returns): more than 250 feet on the approach leg to a full turn intersection; more than 150 feet on the exit leg from a full turn intersection; more than 250 feet between driveways All access configurations shall require City Engineer review and approval.” The Plan recognizes Highway 111 to be a Major Arterial and Dune Palms Road to be a Primary Arterial. The Traffic Study identifies intersection design and spacing. 321 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 32 of 38 Policy 4: “Encourage expansion of ridership and the service area of the public transit systems operated by the Sunline Transit Authority within the City.” The Plan proposes residential development and employment opportunities within walking distance of Sunline Transit routes and stops. Program 5.1: “In order to locate jobs and housing near each other to reduce shorter work commutes, make a concerted effort to increase City-based employment; encourage mixed-use development with a residential component contiguous with or near to employment centers; facilitate use of the City’s home occupation ordinance; and encourage major employers to evaluate telecommuting opportunities, either home-based or at local centers, as well as parttime options for employees.” The Plan proposes a residential development near employment centers along the Highway 111 corridor. Policy 13: “Continue to implement the Image Corridors in the City, and identify new image corridors for streets brought into the City through annexation.” The Plan recognizes that both Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 are Image Corridors, and includes revised Image Corridor setbacks and height standards. Policy 15: “The City shall maintain building height limits along Primary, Secondary and Agrarian Image Corridors in its Development Code.” The buildings will be limited in height according to current standards. 6.9 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 7: “The City shall encourage the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects.” The open space in the residential segment proposed in the Plan accounts for more than 30% of the total area. 6.10 PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 2: “Sufficient parkland and recreational facilities to meet the active and passive recreational needs of all residents and visitors.” The Plan proposes open space and several recreational facilities throughout the development to serve Project residents. 6.11 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 1: “The City shall encourage the incorporation of energy conservation features in the design of all new construction and the installation of energy-saving devices in existing development.” The Plan identifies energy conservation opportunities. Program 1.2: “Passive design concepts which increase energy efficiency, such as the use of landscaping materials and site orientation to provide shade and windbreaks, shall be encouraged.” 322 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 33 of 38 The Plan identifies design standards that incorporate active and passive features to increase energy efficiency. 6.13 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 2: “Staff shall review all development applications for vacant land for their potential impacts to existing wildlife and habitat. Agricultural lands shall be exempt from this requirement, except as described.” A biological survey has been completed for the Project site. Policy 3: “Native, drought-tolerant desert plant materials shall be incorporated into new development to the greatest extent practical. Invasive, non-native species shall be discouraged.” The Plan provides for the use of native, drought-tolerant plants as noted in Section 4.9 of this Plan. 6.14 PALEONTOLOGIC RESOURCES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Goal 1: “The identification and preservation of significant paleontologic resources which occur in the City.” A paleontologic study has been performed for the site. 6.15 WATER RESOURCES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 1: “The City shall support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses.” The Project area will be adequately served by the Coachella Valley Water District. 6.16 SURFACE WATER & STORM DRAINAGE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 2: “All drainage facilities identified in the Comprehensive Drainage Master Plan7 shall be constructed to conform to the requirements and standards of the city and CVWD.” Drainage facilities will be in conformance with all applicable city and agency standards. Policy 3: “All new development shall include on-site retention/detention basins and other necessary storm water management facilities to accommodate runoff from the 100-year storm.” The Plan addresses storm water management facilities within the Project area. Policy 4: “The City shall assure that roadway storm water facilities are designed, constructed and maintained in a manner which eliminates standing water and flooding.” All roadway storm water facilities will conform to City standards. 6.17 DOMESTIC WATER GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 1: “The City shall assure that adequate, high-quality potable water supplies and facilities are provided to all development in the community.” The Coachella Valley Water District will serve the Project area with potable water. 6.18 SANITARY SEWER GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 1: “The City shall assure the provision of adequate sanitary sewer collection and treatment services and facilities to all development in the community.” The Coachella Valley Water District will provide adequate sanitary sewer services to the Project area. 323 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 34 of 38 City of La Quinta, Master Drainage Plan, March 2009. 6.19 PUBLIC UTILITIES GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 3: “All utility and electric wires up to 34.5 kilovolts serving new development shall be installed underground.” All utility and electric wires will be installed underground. Program 4.1 “To the greatest extent practical, all new utility equipment boxes, including but not limited to traffic signal equipment, and electrical and telephone equipment, shall be located either underground, or away from street corners and effectively shielded from public view. Undergrounding of these facilities is preferred.” All utility equipment boxes will be underground to the greatest extent practical. Program 1.2: “The Building Department shall ensure that all plumbing fixtures in new development and remodeling projects conform to applicable California statutes and codes especially dealing with water saving fixtures. The residential development will implement water saving features, including appliances, as applicable. Policy 6: “All development plans shall be reviewed for their potential to create surface and ground water contamination hazards from point and non-point sources. The contamination hazards were evaluated in the EIR. 6.20 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 4: “To reduce the potential impacts of subsurface sewage disposal systems on human health and the environment, the City shall encourage, to the greatest extent practical, the connection of new development to the Coachella Valley Water District’s sewage collection system.” The development will be connected to the Coachella Valley Water District’s sewage system. 6.21 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 5: “To minimize the hazards associated with groundshaking and other seismic events, all new structures shall be built in accordance with the latest version of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and/or International Building Code.” All buildings shall comply with the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of La Quinta. Policy 9: “All new development shall be required to minimize, to the greatest extent practical, blows and other wind erosion hazards affecting properties downwind.” The Plan addresses wind and erosion control on the site and will minimize effects to the greatest extent practical. 7 324 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 35 of 38 6.22 FLOODING AND HYDROLOGY GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 5: “Drainage policies and development standards shall provide for a reduction in runoff from developed lands and shall be consistent with local and regional storm water management plans.” The City and CVWD are working together to implement runoff reduction. 325 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 36 of 38 Program 5.1: “At the discretion of CVWD, new development shall continue to be required to construct on-site retention/detention basins and other necessary storm water management facilities that are capable of managing 100-year storm water flows. New development immediately adjacent to the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel shall continue to have the option of discharging 100-year storm water flows directly into the storm water channel.” The City and CVWD have agreed to adequate management of site drainage. 6.23 NOISE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Policy 1: “The City shall maintain noise standards in conformance with the Table 8.1, Community Noise and Land use Compatibility.” The proposed Project will conform to all City noise standards. 6.24 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Program 3.2.1: “Require all proposed project sites to be surveyed by a qualified archaeologist, historian, and/or architectural historian, as appropriate, to identify any potential cultural resources that may be affected, unless the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that such survey is unnecessary”. An archaeological study was performed for the site. 326 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 37 of 38 APPENDIX A: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION The Plan has been written to provide guidelines for the development of an approximately 10 acre commercial site and a 10 acre residential site with a new public roadway. At the time the Plan was written, the Agency was the property owner and development plans for the Project were not yet fully determined. The information contained in this Appendix provides a brief overview of the development likely to be implemented, based upon current Agency agreements and discussions. A.1 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development described in this section meets the objectives and intent of the Plan, envisioning an automobile sales and service development on the northern portion of the site and an affordable rental housing community to the south as described below. As described in the Plan, the proposed Project will require the construction of new public roadway, “A” Street, extending east-west through the site, to be classified as a Local Roadway, requiring approximately 2.14 acres of the Project’s total 22 acres. “A” Street will intersect with Dune Palms Road at a new signalized intersection at the southwestern corner of the Project site, then traverse the western and northern borders of the residential component, terminating to the east into the neighboring Komar/Costco commercial development. “A” Street serves as a boundary, separating the two land use components of the project. A.1.1 Auto Commercial/mixed-use Concept The proposed commercial component fronts on Highway 111, and is located directly north of the residential uses, which will be buffered by “A” Street, as well as appropriate setbacks and landscaping. The commercial/ mixed-use component itself would serve to buffer the apartment homes in the south from the traffic and noise of Highway 111. Regional commercial uses are permitted and envision in the Plan, culminating in a commercial or mixed-use development with varying commercial uses, including a hotel. The primary use permitted in the Plan is the sale and service of automobiles, thus two to three dealerships are proposed, utilizing a shared entry from Highway 111. It is proposed that the dealerships will be new to the east Coachella Valley, and the location will provide convenient commercial services sales and service for residents of La Quinta and the greater area. The main entrance to the commercial component is envisioned from Highway 111 and would culminate in a roundabout feature directly south of the driveway entrance, in front of the dealerships. This entry will generally be reserved for customers, although it also allows access to a perimeter aisle which circumnavigates the parcel and provides limited access to “A” Street. Delivery and service trucks will enter from a secondary entrance east of the main drive on Highway 111. This second entry will provide more direct access to the southern end of the parcel where parts and automobiles will be delivered. The commercial/mixed-use site is anticipated to be developed in multiple two phases. The first phase will be the construction of a branded hotel on the north east portion of the project site. two buildings - one on the east and one of the west side of the roundabout - each of which will house dealership showrooms and offices, service bays, parts storage, and small boutiques for branded accessories and merchandise. During the first phase, the dealerships will likely focus on brand certified, pre-owned vehicle sales and vehicle service. The parking and delivery areas, as well as all lot grading, will be completed during phase one. The second subsequent phase of construction would include subsequent commercial/ mixed-use buildings as 327 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 38 of 38 they are proposed., expected to take place approximately five years after the first phase, will add a third building at the southern point of the roundabout to accommodate a third dealership. The existing dealerships would at that time be modified to include new vehicles sales as well as the certified pre-owned vehicles. Any necessary re-alignment of parking and/or delivery areas on the southern end of the parcel will be completed during the second phase of construction. The architectural designs and stylistic tones of the commercial/mixed-use buildings dealerships will be visually appealing and compatible with other Highway 111 uses, while conveying the images of the respective corporate affiliations. Appropriate signage and brand images will be incorporated into the final design of the commercial/mixed-use development such that the needs of the building tenants automobile franchises are met, while the high aesthetic standards of La Quinta are adhered to. A.1.2 Residential Concept The proposed residential component will provide highly desirable affordable housing for singles, couples and families with children, with a variety of unit sizes to accommodate the needs of future residents. Up to 200 apartment homes will be designed to reflect a Desert Modern architectural style, which features clean lines and colors to complement the desert’s beauty, as well as energy and water-saving features to enhance sustainability and lower service costs to residents. Many of the buildings contain a mix of unit sizes and heights, not to exceed two stories. Units would range from one to three bedrooms with a minimum size of 700 square feet and an estimated average size of 900 square feet. Buildings are proposed to be primarily arranged in groupings to create a series of open spaces buffered from parking areas, which will improve the safety of children at play and reinforce the pedestrian character of the development. The overall site plan would maintain stylistic elements visually similar to those in other areas of La Quinta, including meandering paths, drought resistant landscaping, and compatible building design and detailing. Because of the noise environment along the south edge of the residential development stemming from the DSUSD bus yard, the proposed footprints of the buildings have been designed so that they form a barrier or sound attenuation feature along the southern boundary. The buildings immediately adjacent to the DSUSD property will be designed and built with extra insulation/sound absorbing features along the southernmost walls to ensure that interior noise levels meet City standards, notwithstanding the daily safety checks of the bus horns. The Desert Modern architectural style of the residential development may be characterized by elements such as: Articulated facades Primarily horizontal emphasis Balconies and patio areas Sunscreen eyebrows Flat roofs Shaded walkways The Desert Modern style compliments surrounding uses, while incorporating a contemporary lifestyle image that will harmonize with the surrounding commercial uses. A.1.2.1 Open Space and Recreation The residential component is designed to maximize open space and areas for landscaping in order to create a livable, enjoyable environment. To balance between function and aesthetic features, buildings will be largely oriented towards open spaces and an activity area that is both safe for children and visually appealing. The key central open space will extend 328 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 39 of 38 through the center of the residential site, from near the southwestern entrance near Dune Palms Road toward the northeastern corner of the Project before A Street meets the Komar/Costo site. This is the primary recreational area within the development and will be the only area where turf landscaping in play areas will be implemented. The site design provides for ample droughttolerant landscaping throughout the development. It is anticipated that roughly four acres of the residential site will have landscaping of some kind. To minimize water usage but still offer ample play areas for children, turf is expected to be used only in strategic play areas and kept to a minimum to reduce water demand of the site. In total, under one acre of turf is anticipated. The remaining open space, as well as the pan handle, will be landscaped with native and drought tolerant plantings. Trees may also be strategically located within the residential component. The centralized open space core is proposed to be anchored by a pool and community center in the southwestern area. Other features may include pedestrian walkways leading through the central landscaping and turf areas, passive recreation areas, a tot lot, BBQ’s, shade structures, places to sit, or a community garden. This environment will encourage residents to enjoy outdoor activities and allow space for adults to supervise children at play. Additionally, if needed, the area provides the necessary emergency access for public safety vehicles. A.1.2.2 Community Center A community center for the development is proposed on site for the benefit of the residents. The community center would likely be located near the main entrance to the residential community to allow current and potential residents easy access to the leasing office. In addition to management offices, the center may include meeting rooms, a computer room, game room and a checkstand or similar facility for pool and recreational equipment. The meeting rooms may be reserved by residents and used for a variety of needs such as club meetings or tutoring sessions. Restrooms will also be available for residents enjoying the adjacent pool area. 329 CITY OF LA QUINTA Page 40 of 38 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Resolutions and Conditions of Approval 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 City of La Quinta Dune Palms SPA Response to Comments The City circulated the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for public comment from January 2, 2019 through January 22, 2019. At the close of the comment period, the City had received 6 comment letters. The following addresses the comment letters individually, by first summarizing the commenter’s statements, and then providing a response. A copy of the complete comment letters are provided at the end of this Response to Comments. A. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Comment A-1: The Tribe recommends that any identified cultural resources should be curated at a County repository which meets federal requirements, rather than at the City. Response A-1: The Tribe’s comment is noted. However, as the Tribe may be aware, the City is a Certified Local Government, and works with the City’s historical museum to curate and display locally found artifacts. Please also see Response B-1 below. B. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians Comment B-1: The Tribe concurred with mitigation measure CUL-1, and requests that one of their monitors provide the service during ground disturbing activities. The Tribe also recommends that the City consult with the Tribe regarding the disposition of artifacts, as it prefers re- burial in some instances. Response B-1: The City appreciates the Tribe’s concurrence with the mitigation measure, and will require the applicant(s) to engage Twenty-Nine Palms’ monitor(s) during ground disturbing activities. The City will also consider the monitor’s recommendations regarding the curation or re-burial of artifacts, should any be identified. C. Desert Sands Unified School District Comment C-1: The District explains its concerns regarding the impact to its school facilities, and points out that there is a school mitigation fee for all new projects. Response C-1: The City understands the District’s concerns, and assures the District that it collects all applicable school mitigation fees prior to the ATTACHMENT 3 343 issuance of building permits, and will do so for projects within this site. D. Imperial Irrigation District Comment D-1: Letter item Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4: The District indicates that the applicant(s) for future projects will be required to apply for design and engineering with detailed load information. Response D-1: The comment is noted. It is the City’s standard practice to require that all applicants consult with and receive approval from all utility providers. The City will require this for all projects within the Specific Plan area. Comment D-2: Letter item Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8: The District summarizes its requirements for easements, construction and operation on IID property or easements, and for the construction or modification of IID facilities. Response D-2: Please see Response D-1. The City will require that all project applicants consult and receive approval from the District prior to the issuance of permits. Comment D-3: Letter item No. 9: The District indicates that piecemealing or segmenting of projects is not permitted under CEQA. Response D-3: The City understands the requirements of CEQA, and for that reason studied the build out of the entire Specific Plan area in the Initial Study. Because no immediate projects are proposed on the westerly 7 acres, the maximum build out potential under the City’s General Plan and Zoning standards were utilized. Therefore, the Initial Study analyzed and considered the worst case scenario, as is appropriate under CEQA. Comment D-4: Letter item No. 10: The District notes that the placement of landscape materials should be carefully considered to avoid dangerous conditions, using its landscaping guidelines. Response D-4: Please see Response D-1. E. SunLine Transit Agency Comment E-1: The Agency indicates that it provides service adjacent to the Specific Plan area on Highway 111, and that it does not require additional facilities. It also describes suggestions for transit friendly pedestrian access. 344 Response E-1: The City thanks SunLine for its suggestions, and assure the Agency that it currently includes review and recommendations for pedestrian access to transit in its project review, and will continue to do so. F. South Coast Air Quality Management District Comment F-1: The District expressed their concerns with the use of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and reliance on the General Plan EIR. The District also proposed additional mitigation measures. Response F-1: The District’s comments are noted. The City appropriately analyzed the build out of the proposed project site under General Plan conditions, as only a portion of the site is proposed for development at this time. For the balance of the Specific Plan area, General Plan build out was assumed. The air emissions anticipated for the Specific Plan area do not increase overall emissions, but instead were included in the General Plan calculations. As was the case in the General Plan EIR, the land use intensities planned for the Highway 111 corridor, including the project site, will result in emissions that exceed daily thresholds. However, contrary to the commenter’s statement, the City did indeed make findings relating to air quality in the General Plan EIR, and adopted a statement of overriding conditions thoroughly addressing air emissions. The General Plan EIR included mitigation measures, which are applied to all projects. The General Plan EIR is posted on the City’s website, at www.laquintaca.gov, and has been since its circulation. The City also notes that the District commented on the General Plan EIR, and found the analysis adequate at that time. The City thanks the District for its list of mitigation measures. The City will indeed, when future projects are submitted for the 7 acres of land, include consideration of electric vehicle charging stations, solar energy and other emission reducing strategies in project plans when development proposal(s) are brought forward. The City notes that delivery vehicles are currently, under District rules, required to idle for less than 5 minutes; that the City has a transportation demand ordinance and requirements for compliance with this ordinance for large employers in its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan; and that the Building Code now requires the installation of Energy Star appliances to meet energy reduction standards. 345 346 347 03-003-2018-002 Dear Mr. Carlos Flores, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the SPA No.1- SP 2018-0002, EA 2018-0005 project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: [VIA EMAIL TO:cflores@la-quinta.org] City of La Quinta Mr. Carlos Flores 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 January 16, 2019 Re: Comments for the SPA No.1- SP 2018-0002, EA 2018-0005 Initial Study Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6829. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, Katie Croft Cultural Resources Manager Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS #* CUL-1 states that artifacts will be delivered to the City Planning Division. We recommend curation of artifacts at a repository within Riverside county that meets federal standards (36 CFR Part 79). 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: January 18, 2019 CFlores@laquintaca.gov Carlos Flores, Associate Planner City of La Quinta, Design and Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Proposed Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road Specific Plan Amendment South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. SCAQMD Staff’s Summary of Project Description The Lead Agency proposes to construct a mixed-use development consisting of 140 residential units, approximately 305,000 square feet of retail, and a hotel with 108 rooms totaling 601,816 square feet on three acres (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project is located on the southeast corner of Dune Palms Road and State Route 111. Construction of the Proposed Project is expected to occur over one year, and operation of the Proposed Project is expected in 20201. SCAQMD Staff’s Summary of Air Quality Analysis In the Air Quality Analysis section, the Lead Agency quantified the Proposed Project’s construction emissions and found those emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s recommended regional and localized air quality CEQA significance thresholds. Nonetheless, the Lead Agency proposed three mitigation measures2. Mitigation Measure AQ-1 includes measures for implementation during project earth moving, grading, and construction activities. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 requires that “all mixed use and retail commercial projects within the Specific Plan area shall be subject to the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan3.” Mitigation Measure AQ-A requires regular monitoring by the City Engineer and Public Works inspector to ensure and enforce implementation of mitigation measures during construction4. The Lead Agency also quantified the Proposed Project’s operational air quality impacts using the Proposed Project-specific trip generation. The Proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 8,586 daily trips5. The Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project’s operation-related NOx emissions would be 161.44 pounds/day (lbs/day), which would exceed SCAQMD’s recommended regional air quality CEQA significance threshold of 100 lbs/day for NOx for Coachella Valley6. However, the Lead Agency found that this impact would be less than significant because this impact was analyzed in the General Plan environmental impact report (EIR), which found that “potential air quality impacts could not be mitigated to less than significant levels” and adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding 1 MND. Page 19. 2 Ibid. Page 22. 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. Page 19. 6 Ibid. Table 2. Page 20. 356 Carlos Flores January 18, 2019 2 Considerations that were approved by the Lead Agency7. Additionally, while the Lead Agency stated that the Proposed Project’s operational NOx emissions cannot be reduced to less than significant, the Lead Agency discussed the Proposed Project’s economic and social benefits and stated that the Proposed Project would be consistent with the visions and policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan8. SCAQMD Staff’s Comments SCAQMD staff is concerned with the operational air quality impact analysis and the Lead Agency’s finding that a MND is an appropriate CEQA document for the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. MND and Tiering One of the basic purposes of CEQA is to inform governmental decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of proposed activities (CEQA Guidelines Section 15002(a)(1)). A MND is appropriate when the Lead Agency finds that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, or the project’s significant effects, after revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed mitigated negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, will not have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070) (emphasis added). Reasons to support this finding shall be documented in the initial study. Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment […] (CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b)) (emphasis added). As stated above in the Summary, the Proposed Project’s operational NOx emissions would exceed SCAQMD’s air quality CEQA significance threshold. The Lead Agency stated that “although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case9.” The Lead Agency merely stated the finding for the air quality impact in the General Plan EIR, the Proposed Project’s consistency with the General Plan Land Use Element, and the Proposed Project’s economic and social benefits. The Lead Agency did not include mitigation measures or make revisions to the Proposed Project to show that significant operational NOx emissions would be reduced or avoided to less than significant to justify the preparation of a MND instead of an EIR. Additionally, the Lead Agency did not analyze how the land use consistency with the General Plan and project benefits would reduce the Proposed Project’s operational NOx emissions to below the significance threshold to serve as substantial evidence to support a fair argument that the Proposed Project would not have any adverse effects on air quality. Moreover, the air quality Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-A are to reduce the Proposed Project’s emissions from construction emissions, not operation, and it is also unclear how Mitigation Measure AQ-2 on subjecting the Proposed Project to the requirements of the City’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan would reduce the operational NOx emissions. 7 Ibid. Page 20. 8 Ibid. 9 MND. Page 10. 357 Carlos Flores January 18, 2019 3 Furthermore, the Lead Agency’s discussion on the General Plan EIR suggests that the Lead Agency is tiering the Proposed Project’s air quality impact analysis from a broader EIR. Tiering is appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from an EIR prepared for a general plan, policy, or program to an EIR […]. Tiering does not excuse the Lead Agency from adequately analyzing reasonably foreseeable significant environmental effects of the project and does not justify deferring such analysis to a later tier EIR or negative declaration (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(b). A later EIR shall be required when the initial study or other analysis finds that the later project may cause significant effects on the environment that were not adequately addressed in the prior EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(f)). Significant environmental effects have been “adequately addressed” if they have been mitigated or avoided as a result of the prior environmental impact report and findings adopted in connection with that prior environmental report; or they have been examined at a sufficient level of detail in the prior EIR to enable those effects to be mitigated or avoided by site specific revisions, the imposition of conditions, or by other means in connection with the approval of the later project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(f)(3) (emphasis added). Here, it appears that the Lead Agency used the air quality impact analysis contained in the prior, broader General Plan EIR as substantial evidence to support that the Proposed Project’s operational air quality impacts would not be significant because the Proposed Project is located in the Regional Commercial Zone and the impacts of development in the RC Zone had been analyzed in that large-scale General Plan EIR10. However, since the air quality impacts in the General Plan EIR found that potential air quality impacts could not be mitigated to less than significant levels11, the Proposed Project’s operational NOx emissions were found to be significant and could not be adequately addressed in the prior EIR. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency include feasible mitigation measures to show the Proposed Project’s operational air quality impacts would be mitigated to less than significant in the Final MND; otherwise, an EIR should be prepared for the Proposed Project. Recommended Mitigation Measures CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized to minimize or eliminate any significant adverse air quality impacts. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following mitigation measures in the Final MND.  Provide electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. Require at least 5% of all vehicle parking spaces include EV charging stations.  Limit delivery vehicles’ idling time to no more than five minutes. For any delivery vehicle that is expected to take longer than five minutes, the vehicle’s operator shall be required to shut off the engine. Notify the vendors of these idling requirements at the time that the delivery purchas e order is issued and again when vehicles enter the gates of the facility. To further ensure that drivers understand the vehicle idling requirement, post signs at the facility’s entry gates stating that idling longer than five minutes is not permitted.  Reduce mobile source emissions from employee commute, if applicable. Encourage any employer that employs 250 or more employees at a work site, on a full or part-time basis, to implement an Employee Commute Reduction Program (ECRP) under SCAQMD Rule 2202, On- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Option. For more information on Rule 2202 and guidelines for the ECRP, please visit SCAQMD’s website, at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/programs/business/business-detail?title=rule-2202-on-road-motor- vehicle-mitigation-options. 10 Ibid. Page 20. 11 Ibid. 358 Carlos Flores January 18, 2019 4  Maximize use of solar energy including solar panels; installing the maximum possible number of solar energy arrays on the building roofs and/or on the project site to generate solar energy.  Maximize the planting of trees in landscaping and parking lots.  Use light colored paving and roofing materials.  Utilize only Energy Star heating, cooling, and lighting devices, and appliances.  Require use of electric or alternatively fueled sweepers with HEPA filters.  Require use of electric lawn mowers and leaf blowers.  Use of water-based or low VOC cleaning products. Several resources are available to assist the Lead Agency with identifying potential mitigation measures for the Proposed Project, including:  Chapter 11 of SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook  SCAQMD’s CEQA web pages available here: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air- quality-analysis-handbook/mitigation-measures-and-control-efficiencies  SCAQMD’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) for the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) available here (starting on page 86): http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2017/2017-mar3-035.pdf Other Comment The Proposed Project’s air quality impact analysis discussed and potentially tiered from the air quality analysis and findings from the prior, broader General Plan EIR. Because the MND for the Proposed Project did not state where a copy of the General Plan EIR may be examined, SCAQMD staff was not able to review or comment on completeness or adequacy of the Air Quality Analysis for the Proposed Project. “When tiering is used, the later EIRs or negative declarations shall refer to the prior EIR and state where a copy of the prior EIR may be examined. The later EIR or negative declaration should state that the lead agency is using the tiering concept and that it is being tiered with the earlier EIR” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(g)). To foster meaningful public participation and input, and informed decision making, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency state where a copy of the prior General Plan EIR may be examined or incorporate by reference all or applicable portions of the prior environmental analysis in the Final MND. Conclusion Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. 359 Carlos Flores January 18, 2019 5 SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact Robert Dalbeck, Assistant Air Quality Specialist, at rdalbeck@aqmd.gov or (909) 396-2139, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Lijin Sun Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources LS:RD RVC190111-06 Control Number 360 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Chris Escobedo, Community Resources Director DATE: February 19, 2019 SUBJECT: PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM OUTREACH & SURVEY At the January 15, 2019 meeting, the City Council directed staff to proceed with a pilot program of the public safety camera system. The program will run from March 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019. Cameras will be installed only at the following intersections: •Washington Street and Avenue 52 •Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive •Jefferson Street and Avenue 49 Council requested a list of the outreach efforts staff will conduct as part of the pilot program. These include: •Weekly viewing of video footage at City Hall •Small group/one-on-one discussions about the camera system •Online information page with Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) •Notification and ads in the Gem (March/April/May) •Weekly Items of Interest (IOI) notification •Feedback and input ability on the policies and procedures •Information shared at City facilities, events, and farmer’s market •Social media campaign including videos and infographics •Press releases and media advisories as progress takes place •Outreach at community and neighborhood watch meetings One outstanding question was the timing of when to conduct a third- party survey. Staff recommends utilizing feedback received during the program period as the basis for the questions in the third-party survey. The survey should run at the end of the pilot period (June) so the public has the benefit of experiencing the cameras and the program will be top- of-mind rather than later in the year. This would require a contract with a survey firm by March 2019. Staff contacted three firms who can meet this time frame and costs range from $22,000 - $30,000. Staff seeks guidance from the Council if they want to advance the timing of the survey. If so, staff will bring forth a business item to consider a survey firm at an upcoming Council meeting. DEPARTMENT REPORT ITEM NO. 4 361 362 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bryan McKinney, City Engineer DATE: February 19, 2019 SUBJECT: MADISON STREET WIDENING PROJECT UPDATE During the February 5, 2019 Study Session on the equestrian overlay zone and Madison Street Widening Project, Council directed staff to explore replacing the sidewalk planned for the west side of Madison Street between Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 with a multi-use path that could also accommodate equestrian use. Staff performed a field review and determined that constructing a 10-foot- wide multi-use path, per the City’s design standards, would not be feasible due to the following physical constraints: the existing IID power poles in the parkway and the trees the adjacent communities want protected. A multi-use path would also impact the already constructed drainage improvements and create grading issues where the ground drops off near the edge of the right of way. The attached photos (Attachment 1) show some of these areas. After discussion with the City Manager, it was decided that the best course of action would be to replace the sidewalk with decomposed granite (DG). Pedestrians and equestrians will still be provided a sidewalk and multi-use path on the east side (City of Indio) of Madison Street. Staff is in discussion with the City of Indio to get a proposed cost from the contractor to effect this change. Attachment: 1.Photos of Madison Street Current Conditions DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 5-A 363 364 ATTACHMENT 1Photos of Madison Street Current Conditions 365 366 D E S I G N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T R E P O R T - J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 R E P O R T T H E D E S I G N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T R E P R E S E N T S O N E O F S I X C I T Y D E P A R T M E N T S , A N D C O N S I S T S O F S I X D I V I S I O N S : T H E H U B , P L A N N I N G , B U I L D I N G , P U B L I C W O R K S D E V E L O P M E N T , E N G I N E E R I N G S E R V I C E S , A N D A D M I N I S T R A T I O N . Design and Development Department the HUB The Hub serves as a one-stop shop for La Quinta patrons. It is the central location for obtaining permits for planning, building, engineering, garage sales, and special events. The Hub assists customers through the permitting process from initial questions and pre-application meetings through inspections and final certificate of occupancy. Below are some January 2019 metrics: CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Permit and Project Fees Collected $242,869 $790,131 Active STVRP Business Licenses 832 9691,709 73 287 Phone Calls Received Total Customers Served Total Issued Permits Total E-TRAKiT Permits TOT Collected In June 2016, The Hub launched a survey to measure the satisfaction of its customers. The survey uses a one to five point rating system, with five points being 100% excellent. The Hub Customer Satisfaction survey results for the month of January 2019 averaged at 94.2%. 0 25 50 75 100 Wait TimeHelpfulnessQuality367 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 5-B D E S I G N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T R E P O R T - J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 R E P O R T Design and Development Department PLANNING ACTIVITY BUILDING The Building Division administers all building permit applications and plans for compliance with requirements established in the entitlement process, La Quinta Municipal Code, and all currently applicable California Building Standards Codes. Includes sign applications, temporary use permits, minor use permits, final landscaping plans, etc. Planning Permits 2019 2018 January Year Year to Date 1,156 1,156 932 932 2019 2018 January Year Year to Date 10 10 9 9 Building Permits Issued 20182019 49 167 118143 39 182 Year January January E-TRAKiT Year to Date 20182019 123 36 159 128 34 162 Year January January E-TRAKiT Year to Date Building Permits Submitted Building Inspections Building Permits Submitted Submitted Applications Building Permits Issued The Planning Division works with residential and commercial property/business owners and developers to ensure development in the City is constructed consistent with the City’s goals and policies. 368 D E S I G N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T D E P A R T M E N T R E P O R T - J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 R E P O R T Design and Development Department TRAFFIC & CIP SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL THE PROGRAM The Short Term Vacation Rental Program, Vacation LQ, continues to grow, as new properties register each month. During the month of January 2019, the following permits were issued and TOT collected: The Development Division provides engineering assistance with a variety of permits. During the month of January 2019, the following number of permits and applications were processed: The Engineering Services Division provides engineering design and construction oversight and traffic support on a variety of infrastructure projects that help keep La Quinta safe and beautiful. Highlighted below are some activities for January 2019: ENGINEERING SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT CIP PROJECTS IN PROGRESS TRAFFIC The City received bids for Project No. 2018-02, Avenida Bermudas ADA Ramps Improvements and is in the process of awarding a contract. On-site construction continues at private development projects including Andalusia, Griffin Ranch, Monterra, Codorniz, Washington Street Apartments and The Citrus. 43 requests for service were recorded in City’s GORequest system in January 2019, including: · Operational checks of crosswalks, warning beacons, and flashing stop signs · 14 Citizen work order, 27 Preventative Maintenance work orders, and 2 Emergency Response work orders STVRP TOT Collected Permits Issued in January 2017 2016Year January $109,867.25 $75,323.58 Currently Active Permits 95 832April$405,334.02 $221,904.07 2017Year 2016 20182019Year January Year to Date 17 17 22 22 20182019Year January Year to Date 30 32 3230 STVRP Permits Project Reviews Completed Permits Issued STVRP TOT Collected Year January 2019 2018 $134,102 $211,242 $134,102 $211,242Year to Date 369 370 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT January 2019 The Facilities Department is comprised of three Divisions; Public Works Maintenance, Parks, and Buildings. MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES •Public Works $31,091 •Parks $11,435 •Buildings $14,574 •Total Expenditures: $57,100 •Total Hours: 1,304 For the month of January, 327 requests were received from residents and staff. Request topics are listed on Attachments 1, 2, and 3. Maintenance expenditures and task hours are recorded in GoRequest. Top Requests in January:  Parks– Inspection Maintenance  Parks - Graffiti  Public Works - Debris Litter Removal  Public Works - Storm Drain Maintenance  Buildings - Facilities Maintenance  Buildings - Personnel Requests POSITIVE SURVEY FEEDBACK FROM RESIDENTS:  “Acted on a request then let me know it was done. Thanks”.  “Amazing speed in fixing the problem”.  “Fully replaced faucet not just a temporary fix. Thank you”  “Very rapid response”. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Public Works Maintenance Expenditures by Task for January. 2. Parks Maintenance Expenditures by Task for January. 3. Building Maintenance Expenditures by Task for January. 4.Customer Satisfaction Survey Details for January. 371 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 6 372 Graffiti $3,411.95 Vandalism Repair $886.71 Landscape Irrigation Contract Mgt $2,973.81 Office Work $92.04 Debris/Litter Removal $6,550.73 Tree Issues $76.32 Yard Maintenance $583.91 Concrete Sidewalk Repairs $1,202.42 Meetings $370.09 Pothole or Street Repair $4,762.35 Pavement Marking $57.47 Flood Control $2,574.67 Lighting -Medians $59.47 Storm Drain Maint $5,004.61 Street Sweeping $162.42 Street Signs $1,707.35 Inspection $615.05 Graffiti Vandalism Repair Landscape Irrigation Contract Mgt Seminars/Training Office Work Debris/Litter Removal Tree Issues Yard Maintenance Concrete Sidewalk Repairs Meetings Vehicle Equipment Pothole or Street Repair Pavement Marking Flood Control Lighting - Medians Storm Drain Maint Street Sweeping Street Signs Inspection Total Maintenance Costs: $31,097 Public Works Maintenance Expenditures for the Month of January 2019 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1373 374 375 376 Fencing Repairs $351.45 Playground Inspection $706.34 Lighting/Electrical $168.34 Gopher & Dog Holes Pest Control $1,222.69 Sign Maint $65.96 Irrigation/Weeds Tree Trimming $907.66 Debris/Litter Removal $589.19 Atheletic Field Insp. $168.34 Inspection Maintenance $3,569.72 Seminars Training $629.05 Tree/Plant Flower Installation $252.51 Events $84.17 Trail Maint $838.26 Meeting $84.17 Graffiti $1,797.11 Fencing Repairs Playground Inspection Lighting/Electrical Gopher & Dog Holes Pest Control Sign Maint Irrigation/Weeds Tree Trimming Debris/Litter Removal Atheletic Field Insp. Inspection Maintenance Seminars Training Tree/Plant Flower Installation Events Trail Maint Meeting GraffitiTotal Maintenance Costs: $11,435 Parks Maintenance Costs for the Month of January 2019 ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 Pest Control $65.83 Painting $1,785.51 Carpentry/Hardware $647.94 Electrical $1,292.07 Janitorial $51.67 Facilities Maint $1,834.42 General Repairs $394.98 Personnel Requests $1,825.29 HVAC $138.15 Plumbing $969.70 Training $249.16 Security/Fobs/Alarms $579.83 Fire Stations $1,603.64 Preventative Maint $377.58 Library $964.82 Museum $1,793.88 Pest Control Painting Carpentry/Hardware Electrical Janitorial Facilities Maint General Repairs Personnel Requests HVAC Plumbing Training Security/Fobs/Alarms Fire Stations Preventative Maint Library Museum Total Maintenance Costs: $14,574 Buildings Maintenance Expenditures for the Month of January 2019 ATTACHMENT 3 ATTACHMENT 3389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 Customer Satisfaction Survey Details 01/01/2019 to 01/31/2019 Request: 35540 Survey Entered: 01-29-2019 Request Entered: 10/28/2018 Closed: 01/22/2019 Days Open: 86 Topic: Debris/Litter Removal/Right of Way Maint - 1011 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Brian Folmer Description: Thank you for picking up large trash pile at bottom of berm on 62nd Ave west of Monroe. There is still a lot of trash all along 62nd Ave west of Monroe. What can be done to pick this up? A citizen effort if city supplies trash bags, etc...? I would like to help. Brian Folmer, 760-485-0785, bjfolmer@gmail.com Reason Closed: Debris picked up How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Average Were we courteous and professional?: Good In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded How can the City improve?: Acted on a request then let me know it was done. Thanks. Request: 36200 Survey Entered: 01-25-2019 Request Entered: 12/17/2018 Closed: 01/18/2019 Days Open: 32 Topic: Parks/Fencing/Wall Repairs Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: Rex Marlowe Description: Gate locking latch is broken/missing. Reason Closed: Installed new door knob on gate. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Good Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Met How can the City improve?: Took longer than normal for the last issue. In the past it has been awesome. Request: 36240 Survey Entered: 01-07-2019 Request Entered: 12/20/2018 Closed: 01/07/2019 Days Open: 18 Topic: Library/Plumbing Employee: Alfred Berumen Customer: Minerva Ochoa Description: Handicapped stall in men's public restroom toilet. Toilet does not flush properly. Has very low water pressure. Reason Closed: work done How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Good Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Met How can the City improve?: Quick fix ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 4401 Request: 36286 Survey Entered: 01-15-2019 Request Entered: 12/23/2018 Closed: 01/08/2019 Days Open: 16 Topic: Parks Inspection Maint -1031 Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: DAVID FAZZONE Description: Can we get better grass in our neighbor park? Reason Closed: Neighborhood parks are not over-seeded, so the Berrnuda grass goes dormant and looks brown in the winter months. It will turn green again in late March/early April. As for weeds, landscape contractor will be applying herbicide within the next few weeks. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Average Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Good Were we courteous and professional?: Good In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Met How can the City improve?: I would like our neighbor park seeded with green grass. Request: 36304 Survey Entered: 01-15-2019 Request Entered: 01/02/2019 Closed: 01/08/2019 Days Open: 6 Topic: Parks/IrrigationWeeds/Tree Trimming Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: Lesliedaniel1@hotmail.com Description: Water leak Reason Closed: Work done. Repaired a broken marlex. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Good Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Average Were we courteous and professional?: Good In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Met Request: 36320 Survey Entered: 01-30-2019 Request Entered: 01/02/2019 Closed: 01/23/2019 Days Open: 21 Topic: Lighting - Medians & Public Right-of-Way - 1083 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Eric Koltweit Description: Lisa from Old Town reported multiple street lights have been out for 9 days. She indicated it is on La Fonda. When I asked for cross street she gave Desert Club Drive. Her number is 760-600- 0758 Reason Closed: contactor installed new electrical wire that was stolen, light are back on How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded Request: 36377 Survey Entered: 01-16-2019 Request Entered: 01/08/2019 Closed: 01/09/2019 Days Open: 1 Topic: Cannot Find My Issue 402 Employee: Christina Gamez Customer: Cesar Torres (Maintenance) Torres Description: Shopping carts in front of the property; on Avenue 47 Reason Closed: The City of La Quinta Code Compliance Division has received your GoRequest and a Code Compliance case has been assigned to an Officer for investigation. Please call Code Compliance Division at 760-777-7050, if you would like an update. Thank you for your civic participation. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded Request: 36442 Survey Entered: 01-30-2019 Request Entered: 01/11/2019 Closed: 01/23/2019 Days Open: 12 Topic: Graffiti in Parks - 1030 Employee: Robert Ambriz Jr. Customer: Andrea Dooley Description: Photo submitted. It is on the bench in front of museum. Reason Closed: Removed graffiti. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Good Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Below Average Were we courteous and professional?: Good In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Below How can the City improve?: Too long to remove graffiti. Request: 36544 Survey Entered: 01-30-2019 Request Entered: 01/18/2019 Closed: 01/23/2019 Days Open: 5 Topic: Street Sign Repair/Maint - 1010 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Eric Koltweit Description: Resident phoned the street sign "bike lane" has been knocked over and blocking sidewalk. She didn't know what side of the road. Reason Closed: Replaced bike lane sign and post. How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded Request: 36565 Survey Entered: 01-29-2019 Request Entered: 01/22/2019 Closed: 01/22/2019 Days Open: 0 Topic: Street Sign Repair/Maint - 1010 Employee: James Lindsey Customer: Channing Hillway 403 Description: Stop sign I head warning sign has broken off at rot in post, probably due to wind. It requires immediate repair. It is located on Bermudas between Martinez and Madrid. Reason Closed: Replaces signs How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded How can the City improve?: Amazing speed in fixing the problem. Request: 36610 Survey Entered: 01-30-2019 Request Entered: 01/25/2019 Closed: 01/30/2019 Days Open: 5 Topic: Library/Plumbing Employee: Alfred Berumen Customer: Minerva Ochoa Description: Hot water faucet in staff break room leaks from base when turned on. Reason Closed: work done How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded How can the City improve?: Fully replaced faucet not just a temporary fix. Thank you Request: 36665 Survey Entered: 01-31-2019 Request Entered: 01/30/2019 Closed: 01/31/2019 Days Open: 1 Topic: Library/Plumbing Employee: Alfred Berumen Customer: Minerva Ochoa Description: Need water filters changed in staff refrigerator. Reason Closed: work done How pleased were you with the helpfulness of the city employee who initially took your service request?: Superior Rate our knowledge and ability to process your request timely: Superior Were we courteous and professional?: Superior In general, how pleased are you with the city services you received during the past year?: Exceeded How can the City improve?: Very rapid response 404 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 2019 City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 1 City Council Meeting February 19, 2019 City Council Meeting February 19, 2019 S1 – Motorized Scooter Operators City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 2 Background •Electric scooter operators offer a new shared mobility service •Users may access scooters through smart phone applications Background •Users advised to follow rules •Operators use short term contractors to charge scooters City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 3 Background •Introduced to communities in two ways: Dropping off unexpectedly or through a program •Promoted as affordable, rapid, and convenient means of travel Analysis •State Law: –Motorized scooters can not operate on roadway of over 25 mph, unless within Class II or IV bikeway –Can not operate on sidewalk –No person under 18 years shall operate without helmet or drivers license •City Code: Can not operate motorized vehicle on City sidewalks or city public gathering areas City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 4 Analysis •Two part discussion: 1) Proactive: Ordinance or pilot program 2) Reactive: Take action if they appear overnight Proactive •City of Palm Desert: –Urgency ordinance with pilot program –Gained information –Selected operator but Council ultimately denied •CVAG could provide suggestions for each City City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 5 Analysis •Other Cities used pilot program to: –Collect data & feedback –Provide caps on fleet size –Collect fees per operator/scooter –Distribute in focused areas Reactive •Palm Springs had hundreds of scooters and ordered cease and desist •Problems: lack of business license, scooters left on sidewalks, and unsafe conditions •Police and City staff left to deal with issues City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 6 Analysis •Possibility of high volume use during event season •Concentration of scooters in public areas and short term rental homes •City staff would be tasked with monitoring Analysis •Staff is seeking Council input for proactive and reactive actions City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 7 City Council Meeting February 19, 2019 S2 – City Recycling Efforts/Initiatives City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 8 Objective •Review recent recycling initiatives •City’s recycling efforts International Legislation •July 2018, China to ban ALL recyclable imports by 2020 •China buys about 60 percent of our mixed paper and 70 percent of scrap plastics •Other Asian countries to enact bans and inspection standards similar to China City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 9 City’s Outreach •Updated website •Created recycling videos •Established school programs •Increased marketing materials •Continue to work with Burrtec City’s Outreach City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 10 School Programs Burrtec City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 11 Questions? City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 12 City Council Meeting February 19, 2019 S3 – Parkway and Median Landscapes Purpose •Discuss a landscape replacement program for aging City‐owned parkways and medians south of Hwy 111 City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 13 Background •Currently north La Quinta parkways and medians are renovated as part of a four‐year CIP project •New landscapes use the Desert Oasis palette approved by Council North La Quinta Improvement Map City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 14 Planting Materials Miles Avenue Median & Parkway City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 15 Miles Avenue Miles Avenue City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 16 Via Sevilla Seeley Drive City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 17 Seeley Drive Medians In Need of Improvement City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 18 City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 19 Eisenhower Median at Ave 50 Cosmetic Improvements City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 20 Eisenhower Median at Ave 50 Cosmetic Improvements City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 21 City Council Meeting February 19, 2019 PH1 – Highway 111 and Dune Palms Specific Plan Amendment Background •South side of Highway 111, east of Dune Palms •22 acres divided by Vista Coralina lane City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 22 Background •Specific Plan approved in 2010 –Auto-oriented retail on north –Affordable housing (Coral Mountain apartments) on south •City has purchase and sale agreement for hotel on 3-acre portion Project Area Map City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 23 Proposal •Applicant (City) requested changes: –Remove specific auto retail references –Allow commercial and/or mixed use development on north, consistent with underlying RC zone –Auto retail still allowed Proposal •Development standard revisions: –Removing 82,000 square feet maximum for commercial –Removing floor area ratio requirements –Allowing maximum height of 60 feet throughout commercial area –Allowing parking lots and drive aisles within landscape setback City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 24 Proposal •Changes consistent with current zoning uses •Expand to allow variety in development Proposal •Planning Commission recommended approval with following exceptions: –Image corridor height requirements remain (22 ft building height maximum within 150 ft of right of way) –Landscape setback standards remain (50 ft from right of way) City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 25 Site Plan City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 26 Environmental Review •Mitigated Negative Declaration and updated traffic study •Mitigation measures reduce impacts to less than significant –Traffic, biological resources, cultural resources, air quality, and noise City Council Meeting ‐ February 19, 2019 27 Environmental Review •Measures include biological and cultural monitors, construction procedures, and offsite traffic improvements