Loading...
Design Workshop724 SOUTH SPRING STREET SUIT 701 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 213.426.1760 PROPOSAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AREA PLAN FOR THE HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA Design Workshop, Inc. Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design 724 South Spring Street, Suite 701 Los Angeles, CA 90014 213.426.1760 designworkshop.com Primary Point of Contact: Jason Ficht 724 South Spring Street Suite 701 Los Angeles, CA 90014 213.426.1764 jficht@designworkshop. com Acknowledgment of Addenda: We Acknowledge receiving Addendum #1 dated November 9, 2018. November 16, 2018 Danny Castro, Design & Development Director City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 Re: Proposal for the Development of an Area Plan for the Highway 111 Corridor Dear Mr. Castro and the Selection Committee, We are delighted to present Design Workshop’s proposal for consulting services for the development of an Area Plan for the Highway 111 Corridor. This project is a remarkable opportunity to set a new trajectory for ensuring stable revenues; balancing the needs of automobiles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians; creating an exceptional public realm and providing confidence and clarity for the private sector to invest in the area. We believe that this process and project will set a new paradigm for corridor revitalization, public process, urban design, connection and community within the city of La Quinta and beyond. Highway 111 is one of Coachella Valley’s great economic corridors and yet it must reposition itself to ensure stable revenues in a changing retail market environment. The corridor’s transformation will form an integral part of the city’s identity. Converting this corridor into a series of walkable districts emphasizing experiential retail, civic, hospitality, recreation, and both horizontal and vertical mixed-use will help to ensure the competitiveness of the city. Connecting the Highway 111 Corridor in a stronger way to the CV Link, adjoining neighborhoods, parks and schools and the region will help to establish a resilient framework on a regional scale. The master plan for Highway 111 will address iconic place-making, environmental sensitivity, community inclusivity, economic sustainability and city-making. The paradigm for corridor redevelopment is changing, from convenience and automobile orientation to multi-modal mobility, finer-grained projects and an emphasis on the public realm. With this in mind, we have brought together an experienced team that balances visionary thinking with a broad spectrum of local knowledge and experience. Design Workshop is a world-renowned urban design and landscape architecture firm with an award-winning portfolio of large-scale master plans and corridor master plans that have catalyzed economic revitalization. Our plans have received accolades for public engagement, revealing the local context, history, and sense of place through tailor-made solutions reflecting the values of the communities where we work. Design Workshop’s plans think big, addressing larger issues of economics, new technology, demographics, real estate development, resiliency, urbanization and infrastructure, while providing innovative solutions in challenging environmental conditions, including desert landscapes. We truly believe that the design of a walkable and inviting corridor that draws people in, for a variety different reasons, will have a profound effect on the fabric of the city, for the better. Design Workshop will lead the planning, public realm design, wayfinding, branding, project management and public outreach for the project. Design Workshop’s recent corridor planning expertise throughout the nation is evidence of our success in leading this type of project and our experience has taught us that no two-corridor projects are the same. We will bring solutions that are tailored to La Quinta. Our approach is flexible and largely informed by a robust public process. Our process for Highway 111 will largely be the result of understanding existing policies and guidelines; listening to stakeholder and public input; meshing it with market and transportation realities to come up with the optimal vision and implementation strategy. Design Workshop’s lead planners and designers are distinctly suited to address the complexity, context and scale of this project. Jason Ficht, AICP-CUD, a planning and urban design leader at Design Workshop, brings two decades of international planning and design experience in the revitalization of districts and a legacy of directing international teams for the world’s highest profile design projects. Jason will be the primary point of contact for the project and is based in Design Workshop’s Los Angeles Office. Jim MacRae, Principal-in-Charge, has widespread experience on complex master plans requiring coordination, clear identity and creative approaches. Jim is a licensed landscape architect in California and will lead the design of public realm improvements and participate in design workshops, public meetings and will provide quality assurance. Design Workshop will be supported by a stellar team of design and technical subconsultants, with experience working in the Coachella Region, Southern California and throughout the country. Spanning over 11 different disciplines, our consultants are leaders in their respective fields. Our core “think tank” team includes: The Concord Group, Katalyst and Fehr & Peers. The Concord Group (TCG) will lead the economic and market analysis and provide recommendations for land use programming and catalytic site design. With extensive experience working with both the private and public sectors resulting in recommendations that consider each point of view, The Concord Group will help to ensure the plan meets the challenges of changing market demand and will result in sustainable long-term revenues for the City of La Quinta. Katalyst is a national urban design firm focused on walkable urbanism with expertise in mixed-use design and how to blend flexible building types to meet market demand while considering how programming provides activation of the public realm. Katalyst will provide urban design strategies for integrating market potential and “buildable” real estate projects and ensure development standards balance specificity and flexibility. Fehr & Peers is known nationally for thought leadership of multi-modal street design and planning that reinforces community goals and objectives. They are experts in parking management, future- proofing circulation systems and ensuring pedestrians and bicycles are seamlessly integrated with automobiles and transit. Fehr & Peers will lead the planning and design for all circulation systems and for integrating the CV Link into the study area. Complementing our team of subconsultants will be periodic peer review of the Highway 111 plan by members from the Urban Land Institute’s Suburban Development and Redevelopment National Product Council (SDRC). The Council is comprised of selected developers, financial experts and consultants, who are leaders focused on the redevelopment and revitalization of the suburbs. Richard Gollis, Principal of The Concord Group is the Council Chair and Jason Ficht of Design Workshop is a council member. Together they will coordinate the Council’s review of the ongoing work of our team at closed sessions at ULI’s upcoming Spring and Fall meetings. The review sessions continue the engagement of independent ULI experts in the Highway 111 Plan process and will help to ensure the plan is both cutting edge and grounded with implementable solutions. As trusted advisors, this carefully assembled team will provide technical expertise, foundational analysis, and an understanding of challenges and opportunities. This group of experts will ensure that the master plan vision is underpinned by robust and feasible thinking that will guide the project from concept through to implementation. Design Workshop is excited about the opportunities to reshape Highway 111 into the defining economic center for La Quinta and a place that goes beyond the project’s boundary. We hope this proposal provides an illustration of our enthusiasm for the project, demonstrates our understanding of the City’s goals and objectives, and commitment to realizing this transformative project to the best of our abilities. We appreciate your consideration of the proposal package and look forward to engaging with you on the project’s next steps. Regards, Jim MacRae, PLA, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge ii iii CONTENTS 01 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 02 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH 03 SCOPE OF WORK 04 SCHEDULE/TIMELINE, REFERENCES & COST PROPOSAL 05 APPENDIX 1 17 45 55 61 ASPEN DOWNTOWN ENHANCEMENT PLAN | Aspen, CO COVER: SHENZHEN VANKE PLAZA | Shenzhen, China v STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 01 CHERRY CREEK NORTH STREETSCAPES | Denver, CO 1 OUR LEGACY The DW Legacy Design® process is defined by four guiding principles: Environment, Community, Art, and Economics. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS Each project begins with identifying what “success” means for the project. This initial exercise identifies and confirms for the team the project outcomes required in order for them to consider the project a success. DW LEGACY DESIGN® METRICS Legacy Metrics are a discovery-oriented tool to shape a collective point of view about a project’s aspirations. This is how we set goals, integrate strategies from all four circles and measure outcomes. Metrics lead to a distilled set of goals that are applied to design solutions resulting in physical outcomes that evidence the comprehensive direction set by the team. LEGACY FOUNDATION BUILDING The DW Legacy Design® method builds a foundation for projects. We establish a dilemma to describe the project’s predicament. This sums up the major challenges and answers the question: “What is standing in the way of a project’s potential for success?” To address this dilemma, we develop a hypothesis about the project to be tested and resolved through design and planning. The best design solution is backed by research and validated through iterative design. ABOUTDESIGN WORKSHOP ABOUTTHE CONCORD GROUP Design Workshop is dedicated to creating Legacy projects–for our clients, society, and the well-being of our planet. Design Workshop is a firm committed to the development of ideas. Over our fifty years, we have earned a reputation for solving design problems with complex conditions. From fragile ecosystems to urban sites in rapidly changing cities, we have the experience to address challenging environments around the world. We are dedicated to the collaborative dynamics of workshops to produce quality design. This approach remains the hallmark of our firm. The Concord Group (“TCG”) is among the nation’s leading real estate strategy consulting firms. We rely on incisive research, accurate interpretation of market trends and creative problem-solving built on decades of on-the-ground experience. Our firm was founded in 1995 and is headquartered in Newport Beach. Since then we have expanded to include offices in San Francisco, New York and Atlanta. We adhere to a high standard of attentive service orientation, with an emphasis on establishing long- term relationships with our clients. This allows us to anticipate, rather than to respond to our client’s needs. Our objective of maintaining a small and selective client base allows our Principals to stay heavily involved in all projects we undertake and to be fully accountable to the client team. TCG’s network includes marketing, planning and design professionals, engineers and others required to create a full-service real estate advisory team. Civic planning is one of the firm’s core practice areas, and the firm is expertly skilled in the analysis of market dynamics impacting financially successful mixed-use development plans. The Concord Group and its Principals have performed numerous market and economic analyses for throughout the nation involving large-scale projects. A background in economic, market and financial analysis is TCG’s foundation for providing realistic, achievable advice. Our clients include land owners, developers, builders, financial institutions and public agencies. We collaborate with our clients through these core services: »Market and feasibility research, including historical analysis and forecasting »Land-use programming and phasing to maximize occupancy and absorption »Highest and best use analysis through supply/ demand and surplus/leakage projections »Product segmentation, positioning and pricing/ proforma strategy »Financial modeling, including land residual, cash flow and profitability analyses »Demographic and lifestyle trend forecasting »Fiscal impact and sales tax revenue analysis TCG provides guidance on a full range of land- uses and product types, including residential, commercial, resort/hospitality and mixed-use development. Our expertise ranges from infill and urban revitalization projects to suburban master planned community development, including: RESIDENTIAL & MIXED USE »Mixed-use/urban infill and transit-oriented development »Single-family detached, multi-family attached (condominiums and apartments) »Master-planned communities and new towns »Low-moderate income housing (rental and for-sale) »Active adult »“Green” development COMMERCIAL »Retail (entertainment, regional, lifestyle, community and neighborhood) »Office »Industrial »Light industrial/flex space HOSPITALITY & RECREATION »Hotel/resort »Condotel, branded residences and timeshare OUR PROCESS Rigorously analyze the site’s extant qualities to identify opportunities and constraints Match site qualities to client objectives and market reality. Iteratively engage stakeholders and clients to reconcile conflicting priorities. Post-occupancy evaluation to measure success. 1 2 3 4 2 3 Our mission is to empower every employee to develop effective and innovative transportation solutions that improve communities FEET FIRST. Our solutions are pedestrian-driven. Why? Because an interactive experience is the foundation to great neighborhoods, communities and cities. Pedestrian-driven developments are also inherently conducive environments for biking, transit, and automobiles to interact in a balanced manner. Our focus on the pedestrian experience is what enhances value creation for existing and new development, captures the culture of a place, and promotes long-term economic success. WHAT WE OFFER »Mixed-use Development »Planning & Land Use Typologies »Transit & Transit-oriented Development (TOD) Design »Public Realm Planning »Enhanced Pedestrian/Bicycle Connectivity »Preservation & Adaptive Reuse »Place Branding »Visual Identity/Logo Design »Visual Communication Systems »Brand & Identity Guidelines »Environmental Design/Signage ABOUTKATALYST Katalyst is an integrated practice of creative designers and innovators in urban design, graphic design and planning. We are dedicated to a collaborative place-making process, resulting in a vision that is unique, sustainable and memorable. Katalyst offers more than 25 years of national and international design experience with offices in California and Colorado. We emphasize direct involvement from principal and senior leadership throughout the duration of every project — building a relationship that extends long after a project is complete. CATALYTIC CHANGE. The ability to be a catalyst isn’t easy. It’s a belief that something can and will be better and inspiring. This is the fundamental principle by which Katalyst was founded and gets its name. Our creative problem-solving ability and transparent process bring together the ideas and interests of many, channeling design solutions that are rooted in market and economic realities, while building upon what makes every place unique. A brand that transcends time. This is the essence of who we are and what it means to be an agent of change. We are focused on improving the overall quality-of-life for the people who live, work, and visit the projects and places we impact. ABOUTFEHR & PEERS Fehr & Peers has specialized in providing transportation planning and engineering services to public and private sector clients since 1985. We develop creative, cost-effective, and results- oriented solutions to planning and design problems associated with all modes of transportation. We offer our clients the right combination of leading-edge technical skills and extensive knowledge of the communities in which we work to deliver comprehensive solutions and superior client service. We are nationally-recognized experts who routinely publish original research, serve on national committees, and teach courses to others in the industry. We do this while maintaining our commitment to translating those techniques into practical solutions. At Fehr & Peers, we take a creative, data-driven approach to each of our practice areas: »Travel behavior & forecasting »Multimodal operations & simulation »Transit planning »Bicycle & pedestrian planning »Sustainable transportation »Freight systems & airports »Integrated land use & transportation plans »Conceptual street & trail design »Transportation engineering & ITS design Clients hire Fehr & Peers because of our commitment to being the best at what we do. We live out this commitment in three distinct ways. First, we invest heavily in our culture to ensure that we are attracting and retaining the best and brightest staff in the industry. Second, we have a robust, internally-funded research and development program that enables us to develop new analytical methods and advance the state of the practice. And third, we survey every client at the completion of every project to assess their satisfaction and to identify areas for improvement. We are very proud of the impact this commitment has had on the communities we have been fortunate to serve. 4 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA URBAN DESIGN KATALYST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FEHR & PEERS REAL ESTATE STRATEGIST THE CONCORD GROUP JASON PACK PRINCIPAL DELIA VOTSCH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER JIM MACRAE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE JASON FICHT PROJECT MANAGER ASHLEE WELLS PROJECT DESIGNER ZOEY ZHANG ENVIRONMENTAL GRAPHIC DESIGNER RICHARD GOLLIS PRINCIPAL MARLON BOARNET SENIOR ADVISOR & PROFESSOR RICHARD FLIERL URBAN DESIGNER KAY FLIERL URBAN DESIGNER DESIGN WORKSHOP PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Jim is a Principal and Shareholder at Design Workshop and has worked on transit- oriented development, commercial corridors, urban entertainment projects, city streetscapes and public spaces both in a planning and technical capacity with built projects in the U.S. and abroad. For over three decades, he has led the planning and design of many notable projects in the United States including the 135th Avenue Corridor Implementation Plan in Leawood, Kansas, East Colfax Re-Urbanization Corridor Study in Denver, and the Academy Corridor Revitalization Plan and North Nevada Streetscape Enhancement Study in Colorado Springs. Jim’s leadership in the content and delivery of his team’s work has resulted in several award-winning projects including Scottsdale Quarter and Gardens of El Paseo, both recipients of ICSC Design and Development awards. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Academy Corridor Transportation Plan - Colorado Springs, Colorado Leawood 135th Corridor Plan - Leawood, Kansas Tempe Downtown TOD & Housing Plan - Tempe, Arizona Eastlake TOD Sub Area Plan - Thornton, Colorado Erie Town Center Plan - Erie, Colorado Thornton Health Care District - Thornton, Colorado North Nevada Streetscape Enhancement Plan - Colorado Springs, Colorado MCA CityWalk - Universal City, California* Pine Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Project - Long Beach, California Grand Junction Revitalization Plan - Westfield, Indiana Springwoods Community Transit Study - Houston, Texas The Domain - Austin, Texas Getty Center - Los Angeles, California* Hebrew Union College/Skirball Museum - Los Angeles, California* Camrose/Highland Park - Los Angeles, California* * Completed prior to joining Design Workshop EDUCATION Master of Urban Design, University of Colorado. Outstanding Graduate Student Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION Licensed Landscape Architect: Colorado, Arizona, California, Texas LEED Accredited Professional CLARB PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS International Council of Shopping Centers American Society of Landscape Architects HONORS & AWARDS 2011: Colorado Chapter American Society of Landscape Architects, Planning & Urban Design Merit Award for Springwoods Village, Houston, Texas 2011: Colorado Chapter American Society of Landscape Architects, Planning & Urban Design Merit Award for Cadence, Henderson, Nevada TEAMORGANIZATION LEAD CONSULTANT MASTER PLANNING, PUBLIC REALM, WAYFINDING & BRANDING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC OUTREACH JIM MACRAE, PLA, LEED®AP 6 7 Jason has 18 years of experience as an urban designer, master planner and city planner. He has led multi-disciplinary teams on new town master plans, mixed-use infill projects, redevelopment urban design strategies, town center designs, design guidelines, city comprehensive plans, and strategic planning efforts. He has experience in both private and public sectors, which gives him a first-hand understanding of how to balance diverse goals and objectives and an appreciation for how the public and the private sectors shape the form and livability of communities. In 2017 and 2015 Jason won the Grand Award from the Pacific Coast Builders Conference for Best International Master Plan for the Al Houara Master Plan in Tangier Morocco and the Mivida Downtown Urban Design Plan in Cairo Egypt. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Highway 84 Corridor Master Plan - Dothan, Alabama Broadway Corridor Master Plan - Galveston, Texas Northside Specific Plan - Riverside, California Queen Creek Station - Queen Creek, Arizona* Shaw Avenue Corridor Specific Plan - Clovis, California* Harbor Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan - Santa Ana, California* City of Clovis General Plan - Clovis, California* City of Mission Viejo General Plan - Mission Viejo, California* Infill Redevelopment Vision Plan - Los Alamitos, California* Infill Vision Plan for Hospital Campus - Clovis, California* Nelles Redevelopment - Whittier, California* Transit-Oriented Development - Laguna Niguel, California* Tustin Legacy - Tustin, California* Jeddah Airport City - Jeddah, Saudi Arabia* Tong Shan Street Redevelopment - Shanghai, China* Qualcomm Stadium Redevelopment Plan - San Diego, California* Museum Park - Tustin, California* Town Center Revitalization Strategy - Mission Viejo, California* Tech Park - Santa Clarita, California* Cultural Terrace - Irvine, California* General Dynamics Redevelopment - Santa Clarita, California* One Paseo Redevelopment - San Diego, California* Irvine Student Housing - Irvine, California* Irvine Transit District Strategic Plan - Irvine, California* * Completed prior to joining Design Workshop EDUCATION Master in Urban and Regional Planning, University of California, Irvine Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Urban Land Institute American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association AWARDS & HONORS 2017 Grand Award Best International Master Plan: Al Houara Master Plan, Morocco 2015 Grand Award Best International Master Plan: Mivida Downtown SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS 2017 ULI Orange County Public Realm Initiative Council 2017 Pacific Coast Builders Conference, “Lessons from Sonoma Mountain Village” 2012 Metropolitan Plan for Southern California Ashlee’s background in landscape architecture ranges from residential design to international master planning. A 2015 Virginia Tech graduate with honors, her academic research explored how shared ecological resources become a catalyst for community resiliency and conflict mitigation. This work earned her many accolades including 2015 LAF University Olmsted Scholar and 2015 ASLA Merit Award Winner. In addition, she worked with struggling rural communities in Virginia, North Carolina, and Kentucky providing pro-bono landscape architectural design. With a focus in foreign markets, Ashlee’s projects allow her to think creatively on a broad range of scales and geographies. Ashlee is passionate about urban design, planning and public park projects. She especially enjoys master planning work that incorporates creative solutions for environmental, social, and economic development. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE The City of Riverside Northside Specific Plan - Riverside, California The Villages at Montclair - Montclair, California 676 Mateo Street - Los Angeles, California 940 E 4th Street - Los Angeles, California 1100 E 5th Street - Los Angeles, California Kline Hotel 6th Street - Austin, Texas Eko Atlantic City - Lagos, Nigeria Chengdu Xindu District Waterfront Park - Chengdu, China Jigna Recreation Area & Nature Preserve - Abuja, Nigeria Bao’an Xiwan Waterfront Design Competition - Shenzhen, China Bluewaters Island & Jumeriah Beach Residence Development - Dubai, UAE* 1 Hotel South Beach - Miami, Florida* Aramco Community Development - Dhahran, Saudi Arabia* Atlantis Sanya Hotel & Resort - Sanya Hainan, China* * Completed prior to joining Design Workshop EDUCATION Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University CERTIFICATIONS LEED Green Associate CSI CDT Technician PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Landscape Architects Urban Land Institute YLG AWARDS & HONORS Sigma Lambda Alpha Outstanding Achievement in Landscape Architecture 2015 Virginia Tech Olmsted Scholar 2015 ASLA Student Honor Award 2015 Stanley Abbot Thesis Award Finalist VT Community Engagement Showcase Award 2014 VT E-Portfolio Showcase Finalist DESIGN WORKSHOP PROJECT DESIGNERDESIGN WORKSHOP PROJECT MANAGER ASHLEE TAYLOR WELLS, PLA, LEED®GAJASON FICHT, AICP 8 9 EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts in Design California State University at Long Beach Interior Architecture Design Santa Monica College PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for Experiential Graphic Design American Institute of Graphic Arts Zoey Zhang is an accomplished and highly specialized environmental graphic designer who has studied and practiced internationally in China and the United States. She holds the belief that environmental graphic design is a key media that leads greater user experience between the people and the community via both 2D and 3D designs. After gaining strong background of interior architecture design, Zoey earned a Bachelor of Arts Design from one of the top programs in the country at California State University Long Beach and started her career in architectural and interior design. It was while working on interiors that she discovered her love for environmental and wayfinding graphic design. She has since developed her skills working on high- profile projects throughout the state of California including parks, educational facilities, government offices, residential spaces, outdoor plaza spaces, and high-end retail. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE VanPlay Visual Branding & Identity - Vancouver, Canada Northwest Detroit Revitalization - Detroit, Michigan Westheimer Road Streetscape Improvement - Houston, Texas Story Mill Community Park Wayfinding - Bozeman, Montana Walnut Bend Streetscape Development - Houston, Texas Westchase District Identity Design - Houston, Texas Roaring Fork Club Wayfinding - Aspen, Colorado Austin Ridge Bible Church Wayfinding - Austin, Texas Aspen Police Station Wayfinding - Aspen, Colorado 84th Street Wayfinding - La Vista, Nebraska Houston Arboretum & Nature Center Environmental “Graphics” - Houston, Texas El Dorado Nature Center Wayfinding - Long Beach, California* One Paseo Mixed-Use Environmental Graphic & Wayfinding - Del Mar Heights, California* Bespoke Westfield Environmental “Graphics & Wayfinding” - San Francisco, California* 255 Grand High End Residential Wayfinding - Los Angeles, California* * Completed prior to joining Design Workshop EDUCATION Bachelors of Art, International Relations, Brown University PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ULI Suburban Redevelopment Council, Chair ULI Redevelopment Council, Chair Jamboree Housing Corporation, Advisory Board Richard M. Gollis is a co-Founder and Principal of The Concord Group based in the Newport Beach office. Since 1995, Richard has crafted and cultivated the firm’s unique approach to advisory services, integrating deep market knowledge with creative analytics to provide best-in-class solutions to a diverse range of private and public sector clients. Richard’s expertise in strategic market analysis, development programming, transaction due diligence and valuation extends across all real estate asset classes. With a career in real estate spanning New England, Atlanta and Southern California, Richard offers an exceptional breadth of experience that makes him a trusted advisor. He works frequently with cities on solving complex development challenges in partnership with world-class developers and financial institutions. Across the country, Richard has led TCG teams on projects that have positively influenced infrastructure and development patterns including: new redevelopment in the urban core; redevelopment of suburban retail to mixed use; transit-oriented nodes and corridor development plans. Respected as a thought leader in real estate, Richard is often quoted in major publications and he is frequently sought after as a speaker at key industry events. Richard was elected a Trustee to the Urban Land Institute in 2012 and has been a Governor of the ULI Foundation since 2006. He is also a Past Chair of the Community Development Council and Juror for the Awards for Excellence and Chair/Past Chair of the Orange County District Council. In addition, he serves on the Leadership Board of The Department of Urban Planning and Public Policy at the University of California, Irvine. EDUCATION Ph.D., Public Affairs, Princeton University Master of Arts, Public Affairs, Princeton University Master of Science, Physics, Rice University Marlon Boarnet is a Senior Advisor to TCG and Professor of Public Policy and Chair of the Department of Urban Planning and Spatial Analysis in the Sol Price School of Public Policy at the University of Southern California. Boarnet’s research focuses on land use and transportation, links between land use and travel behavior and associated implications for public health and greenhouse gas emissions, urban growth patterns, and the economic impacts of transportation infrastructure. He is co- author of Travel by Design (Oxford University Press, 2001), a comprehensive study of the link between land use and travel. Boarnet is a fellow of the Weimer School of the Homer Hoyt Institute for Real Estate, and he received the 2013 David Boyce award for service to regional science from the North American Regional Science Association. He currently serves on the governing board of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. From 2002 through 2014 Boarnet co-edited the Journal of Regional Science, a leading international journal at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Boarnet also serves as an associate editor of the Journal of the American Planning Association (since 2005) and is on the editorial boards of several other academic journals. Boarnet’s academic web page is at: http://priceschool.usc.edu/marlon-boarnet/ THE CONCORD GROUP PRINCIPAL THE CONCORD GROUP SENIOR ADVISOR & PROFESSOR DESIGN WORKSHOP ENVIRONMENTAL GRAPHIC DESIGNER RICHARD GOLLIS MARLON G. BOARNET ZOEY ZHANG, SEGD 10 11 Kay is responsible for guiding the Katalyst creative team toward insightful and relevant brand design and implementation for print, social, and built environments. She brings more than 20 years of experience in place branding, visual identity/logo design, corporate literature and environmental graphic design. An entrepreneur herself, she knows first-hand the importance of crafting an identity and story that communicates the essence of a brand. She enjoys a collaborative approach, carefully listening, observing and integrating multiple entity objectives toward thoughtful, effective, creative solutions. Kay has worked within multi-disciplinary and multi-sector teams, managing and designing ideas from concept to viable design, specifically in the areas of brand creation, development and implementation, and design and coordination of environmental graphic design. Her 25 year career includes working within corporations and ad agencies, in addition to her entrepreneurial roles as a graphic artist and fine artist. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS / PRINT Chagrin Highlands - Cleveland, Ohio*** Downtown Cleveland Vision - Cleveland, Ohio* Downtown Doral - Miami, Florida Downtown Arvada Plan - Arvada, Colorado Flying Diamond Ranch - Santa Fe, New Mexico*** The Quarter: North End Urban Village - Charlotte, North Carolina* West University Place - Houston, Texas*** CIVIC BRAND STRATEGY / IDENTITY / PRINT Greenwood Village Chamber of Commerce - Greenwood Village, Colorado** Larimer Square - Denver, Colorado** Sarah Smith Elementary - Atlanta, Georgia Stone Mountain - Stone Mountain, Georgia* Union Plaza - City of El Paso, Texas*** West University Place - Houston, Texas*** DEVELOPMENT BRAND STRATEGY / IDENTITY / PRINT Downtown Doral South - Doral, Florida Flying Diamond Ranch - Santa Fe, New Mexico*** Grand Lowry Lofts - Denver, Colorado Mount Vernon Plantation - Dunwoody, Georgia One Polo Creek - Denver, Colorado*** Winding River - St. George, Utah** * Denotes project in collaboration with Cooper Carry, Inc. ** Denotes project while at X Design Co. *** Denotes project in collaboration with EDAW EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Landscape Horticulture, Landscape Design Colorado State University, PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Art Students League of Denver AWARDS Landscape Architecture Magazine’s 2001 Excellence in Communication & Marketing- Reports & Proposals In 2013, Richard co-founded Katalyst, a dynamic new design firm which employs a catalytic engagement with clients, community members, and stakeholders, as well as collaborating with other design professionals such as landscape architects, architects, engineers, park programmers, and artists in a personal hands-on approach. Richard has over 25 years of experience leading teams, designing and executing urban placemaking assignments both domestically as well as internationally. Richard began and grew his career in Denver as a lead designer and Senior Associate for the firm EDAW, working in multiple offices on project specific assignments in intense urban environments such as London, Tokyo, Osaka, and others. In 1999, Richard became a principal with Cooper Carry and started a nationally recognized think tank studio that participated in large-scale mixed use urban design focused on downtown/ neighborhood revitalization, transit and TOD, corridor visioning, redevelopment, and urban infill. In 2006 Richard opened the firm’s California office after winning a design competition to be the lead designer on the Transit-Oriented Development District and the Lifelong Learning District at Heritage Fields, the redevelopment of the former El Toro Marine Base in Irvine, California. While leading the Southern California office, Richard worked across the United States in cities such as: Manchester, England; Tokyo, Japan; Houston, Texas; Flushing, Queens, New York; Washington, D.C.; Cleveland; Raleigh; Denver; Pomona; Long Beach; and Omaha. Richard is a frequent public speaker, Chair of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Metropolitan Plan 2025, the former Vice Chair of the ULI Place Initiative Council for Orange County and the Inland Empire, and participates as a design juror, panelist, and symposium leader on topics of urban redevelopment. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan & EIR - Long Beach, California Connect Cobb Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) - Cobb County (Atlanta), Georgia Houston Main Street Vision - Houston, Texas Vancouver 3 Street Design Project, 4th Plain Blvd BRT - Vancouver, Washington East 4th Street - Cleveland, Ohio* Houston Transit Streets Urban Design Plan - Houston, Texas* San Bernardino TOD Overlay, E Street sbX BRT Corridor - San Bernardino, California* Raleigh Fayetteville Street Renaissance - Raleigh, North Carolina* Willets Point Neighborhood Plan - Flushing, Queens, New York* Berry Street Corridor Neighborhood Plan - Fort Worth, Texas* Austin 7th Street Corridor - Austin, Texas* Berry Street Corridor Neighborhood Plans - Fort Worth, Texas Village Square 24th Street Corridor Neighborhood Plan - Omaha, Nebraska* Blount Street Neighborhood Plan - Raleigh, North Carolina* * Completed prior to joining Katalyst EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Landscape Horticulture, Landscape Design, Colorado State University LICENSURE Council of Landscape Architects Review Board (CLARB): Arizona, California - LA3613, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Chairman of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Metropolitan Plan 2025; Orange County & the Inland Empire Chairman of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Place Making Initiative Council for Orange County & the Inland Empire Vice Chairman of the Urban Land Institute Public Realm Initiative Council Urban Land Institute (ULI), Full Member American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) KATALYST URBAN DESIGNERKATALYST URBAN DESIGNER KAY FLIERLRICHARD J FLIERL 12 13 EDUCATION Bachelors of Science, Civil Engineering, Drexel University REGISTRATION Engineer-in Training: California (#154923) Delia has three years of experience. She joined Fehr & Peers after completing her college education in Philadelphia. She was drawn into transportation engineering because of the potential to improve the built environment and to solve exciting and complex problems. She has worked on a variety of projects since joining Fehr & Peers, gaining experience and interest in travel demand forecasting, design, and project management. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE BART Iron Horse Trail Gap Closure - Dublin, California Delia is managing the ongoing effort to redesign the Iron Horse Trail through the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. Delia has prepared cross sections, concept plans and cost estimates for a new station layout, including new pavement, cycle track, sidewalk, lighting and wayfinding signage. County Connection Inductive Charging Station - Walnut Creek, California Delia is involved with the ongoing coordination and design support for the installation of an inductive electric charging station at the Walnut Creek Bart Station for a County Connection bus route. As a project engineer, Delia has prepared plans, specifications and estimates for multiple project submittals, attended meetings and coordinated communication between BART, PG&E, the City of Walnut Creek, County Connection and other engineering consultants. Foothill Road Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon - Pleasanton, California Delia is managing the ongoing coordination and design support for the installation of a new pedestrian hybrid beacon in Pleasanton. Delia has prepared design plans for the installation of the pedestrian signal, and overseen coordination between the City of Pleasanton and PG&E. SR 84 Relinquishment - Fremont, California Delia contributed to the preparation of cross sections, concept plans, and cost estimates for four segments of State Route 84 in Fremont that will be relinquished to the City. Delia developed recommendations for pedestrian crossing treatments. Oakland Bonded Wear Course Striping Plans - Oakland, California Delia designed signing and striping plans to include complete streets elements for 7 streets in Oakland. Complete streets projects include analysis of pedestrian crossings and recommendations for additional enhancements. Delia also designed a road diet and bike facility improvements for corridors throughout the city. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis REGISTRATION Licensed Traffic Engineer: California (TR2402) Mr. Pack began working for Fehr & Peers after receiving his degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Davis in 1999. He worked in the Bay Area market for over four years and worked in the Sacramento market for another five years before moving to Southern California in 2008. He has worked on a wide variety of transportation projects, from general plans and specific plans to detailed corridor, interchange, and signal coordination studies. Additionally, he has applied or developed travel demand forecast models on over 50 projects in the State of California. Jason services our clients throughout Southern California and Arizona, with projects from Bakersfield to San Diego, and Phoenix to Long Beach. Jason has had papers/ presentations accepted to the TRB National Roundabout Conference, the ITE National Conference, and the California APA Conferences. Jason also teaches two classes for the ASCE national webinar series on Roundabout Feasibility Assessment and Process of Signal Coordination. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE GENERAL PLANS Jason has worked on a wide variety of General Plans throughout the state of California. Most of these projects included Complete Street elements, extensive travel demand forecasting, and some level of multi-modal transportation assessment. SPECIFIC PLANS/MASTER PLANS/CORRIDOR PLANS Jason has completed assessment for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. CEQA/NEPA ASSESSMENT Jason has completed transportation assessments for over 100 projects dictated by either CEQA or NEPA. These projects included impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs. TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DEVELOPMENT Jason has completed applied or completed travel demand models on over 50 projects in the State. His use of models has given him an extensive understanding of forecasting and its integration with operations assessment. FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERFEHR & PEERS PRINCIPAL JASON PACK, PE DELIA VOTSCH, EIT 14 15 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH 02 KIERLAND COMMONS | Phoenix, AZ 17 LINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NE A VISION KEEP THE MOMENTUM THE DILEMMA Imagine…In 20 years a La Quinta Highway 111 corridor that has been rendered unrecognizable. A new place, transformed from an auto-dominated, big-box retail corridor into a regional center of distinct districts where walking, biking and ridesharing provide most transportation modes. A network of trails connects you to the CV Link. There is an enhanced level of connectivity fueling an expansion of boutique artisan shops, craft breweries, restaurants, entertainment uses, hospitality, apartments, senior housing and condos. Only the strongest big-box retail remains with the other boxes having been converted into cutting edge residential, office, parking, small industrial, a food hall and incubator commercial. A series of walkable streets paralleling and perpendicular to the highway have dispersed traffic volume allowing Highway 111 to be road-dieted and reconfigured into a “Grand Boulevard.” A Great Street…with managed speeds, lower-volume traffic, fronted with beautiful urban buildings, and protected bike lanes. A Great Street…planted with native drought-tolerant landscape and plenty of shade. The result of this transformation is an increase in the City’s tax revenues ensuring La Quinta’s public services are second to none in the Coachella Valley. Planners, policy makers and real estate experts from around the country have come to study Highway 111’s transformation as an example of “suburban renaissance,” a transformation that is the result of a comprehensive planning process based on market fundamentals, sound real estate development principles, application of public input and careful phasing. Is this a fanciful dream or within reach of La Quinta? In the summer of 2018 the City of La Quinta engaged the Urban Land Institute to complete a Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) focused on the Highway 111 Corridor. The conclusion of the TAP resulted in a series of specific recommendations for the study area including: »Identification of short, medium and long-term catalyst sites. »Reorganization of the area into a series of pedestrian-themed districts. »Identification of event locations to host large and small gatherings. »Unifying and improving the area with cohesive public realm design, branding, wayfinding, a signage program and connectivity to the CV link. »Enacting new Development Regulations allowing for flexibility of use and parking reduction. »Identifying and utilizing appropriate funding mechanisms to stimulate private investment. »Increasing residential densities »Adding a boutique hotel »Working with neighboring cities to establish a regional brand. This report was comprehensive, and the momentum established in the TAP should be leveraged into the final plan. A key distinction our team proposes for ensuring continued momentum is to lead a “Design Week” with the public and stakeholders focused on the market demand and design of short-term catalyst projects identified in the TAP Report. We proposed this Design Week to be an early action in the planning process for Highway 111. A design week is a 5-day workshop. During the day the design team prepares site plans and visions. Highway 111, like many retail corridors, was developed in response to public investment in suburban street infrastructure catering to the automobile. The area is La Quinta’s primary sales- tax revenue source, fueled with big-box retail. This revenue source is at risk of decline with the increase of online sales, changing demographics and demand for experiential retail, restaurants and entertainment. In order to ensure the City can preserve and even grow its revenue, a Highway 111 renaissance is required…a visionary, comprehensive, yet practical plan; a plan that is focused from day one on implementation strategies grounded in market realities. In the evening the public reviews the work and actively participates in shaping the plan. The focus of the design week is to achieve detail for how the catalyst projects will be designed to meet the market and address existing conditions. Designing specific sites early in the process allows the design and planning team to clearly understand what changes are required to the city guidelines and codes, to test the public’s acceptance and to keep the momentum achieved with the TAP process. At the end of the week we will accomplish the following: »Design visions for 1 – 2 catalyst projects that build upon the ULI TAP initial recommendations for early-phase projects. »Specific recommendation for how the public and private sectors can come together to realize the plans. »Having the support of staff, stakeholders and the general public for these projects. »Expediting the drafting of the Highway 111 Area Plan. »Highlighting necessary changes to development standards to ensure the catalyst projects can be accomplished. »Understanding of market demand and financing opportunities for public and private investments. »Giving property owners and development community confidence in the planning process Too often the typical planning process results in years of work studies and reports only to discover at the end that implementation is not realistic. By starting with the visioning process and hosting a design week, we will be able to identify challenges and solutions early in the process, which will result in a successful plan. 18 19 DESIGN WORKSHOPKIERLAND COMMONS PHOENIX, ARIZONA Located in Phoenix, Arizona, Kierland is a 730-acre master-planned community development that includes 216 acres of single and multi-family residential, 123 acres of office space, 107 acres of retail, entertainment and restaurants, and 284 acres of resort and recreational features. At the heart of Kierland, Kierland Commons provides the commercial, social and cultural focus of the community with 73 restaurant and retail stores in one- to three-story buildings that feature condos and office space on upper levels. Design Workshop worked with Nelsen Architects to create the land planning, urban design, landscape architecture and guidelines that have made Kierland a signature destination. Climate enhancement and a central plaza featuring grass, palms and pop-jet fountains make Kierland Commons not only the most distinguished public destination in the area but a model for similar mixed-use development worldwide. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture • Signage & Wayfinding • Permitting • Construction Observation 20 21 DESIGN WORKSHOPGARDENS ON EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA The Gardens on El Paseo is an upscale retail complex in the heart of a premiere shopping district known as El Paseo. The two-level retail environment offers a variety of shopping and dining experiences within a fashionable, pedestrian-friendly retail setting. Within the development, a series of gardens, featuring areas of sun, shade, color and bold patterns reflecting the character of the arid climate, showcase water features and landscaped areas that offer visitors respite from the heat of the California desert. Environmental art and graphics represent and explain the desert region and its rich history. Natural stone materials and palms, flowering trees and succulents form a large garden floor at the center of the site. In the spring, flowering native annuals emerge from the desert arroyo, signaling the vitality of the desert and the Gardens on El Paseo. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture 2000 WINNERINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT AWARDS 2005 COLORADO CHAPTERASLA MERIT AWARD OF DESIGN 22 23 DESIGN WORKSHOPDOTHAN HIGHWAY 84 CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN DOTHAN, ALABAMA Currently Highway 84 does one thing well, it moves cars as quickly as possible. It does not accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, or slow speed vehicles. Development facing the highway logically responds to the character and speeds of Highway 84. Buildings are economical, surrounded by parking and do not attempt to relate to each other. The public realm is devoid of anything that can be described as artful. There are limited sidewalks, no bike paths and lack of street trees, resulting an environment inhospitable to anything but fast-moving automobiles. The Design Workshop team led a facilitated series of public workshops focused on values, vision, alternatives and implementation strategies. Three mixed-use walkable nodes are proposed for downtown, the area around the hospital and the medical college. Modifications to Highway 84 are proposed to be compatible with the character of the mixed use nodes. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design • Master Planning 24 25 DESIGN WORKSHOPBROADWAY CORRIDOR STREETSCAPE & REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GALVESTON, TEXAS The City of Galveston retained the services of Design Workshop to provide professional planning, corridor design and fiscal policy incentives for Broadway Avenue. Galveston is a city located on a barrier island on the southeast coast of Texas. The City has a population of approximately 51,000 residents and sees an influx of over 5 million visitors annually. Broadway Avenue is the primary means of entry and exit for visitors coming to Galveston-as such, it not only needs to move traffic efficiently but should also act as a prominent gateway to the island creating a welcoming first impression for tourists. The corridor is 6.7 miles long and the redevelopment study focused on the roadway corridor as well as the adjacent one-block areas on the north and south sides of the corridor. One main purpose of the study was to efficiently and effectively update the City’s design guidelines to enhance density and diversity along the corridor while maintaining the existing character of each distinct character zone. Then Design Workshop analyzed auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation in and around Broadway as it relates to land use, design guidelines, zoning, and historic landmarks and districts. Three stakeholder engagement meetings were conducted. With input from the public and local business owners and the City, the design team created a vision, identified preferred streetscape sections, updated design guidelines, and prioritized public space improvements. The design team synthesized this information and created clear, concise, and compelling graphics that will be included in design guideline recommendations and adopted by the City to guide development decisions along Broadway. SERVICES PROVIDED • Stakeholder Engagement • Design Guidelines • Project Management • Data Collection & Needs Analysis • Concept Development • Implementation Strategies STREETSCAPE CONFIGURATION OPTIONS 26 27 DESIGN WORKSHOPANGELS CAMPMAIN STREET PLAN ANGELS CAMP, CALIFORNIA DESIGN WORKSHOPDOWNTOWN REDDING TRANSPORTATION PLAN REDDING, CALIFORNIA Design Workshop was hired to assist the City of Angels and the Calaveras Council of Governments (CCOG) in preparing a Main Street Plan. This project addresses community design, public spaces, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and parking facilities along the City’s SR 49 “Main Street.” The Plan provides the tools, designs and strategies necessary to facilitate physical and policy changes to enhance multimodal mobility, accessibility and connectivity, while also enhancing community identity and quality of life. The first phase explored the current site conditions through site inventory, data gathering and stakeholder input. Following this process, the consultant team developed ideas and alternatives that were reviewed and cycled with the management team, Advisory Committee, stakeholders and public for comments and feedback through a series of public outreach events. These concepts were refined to a final set of recommendations, and design guidelines developed for how to support these alternatives. Following the final set of alternatives, strategies were developed for how to implement these plans over time. Quick wins as well as long-term efforts were outlined for a study that will be a vision for the future. Downtown Redding was suffering from a lack of connectivity in the downtown from one-way streets and street closures, which contributed to safety issues and business vacancies in the core area. Design Workshop, as a sub-consultant to Omni-Means, worked with Caltrans and the City of Redding to engage the community and stakeholders in developing vehicular, bike and pedestrian connections; to support residential and business growth through extensive public outreach; and to coordinate feedback on transportation and land use planning. Primary goals of the planning effort looked to connect downtown to the Sacramento River Trail and Turtle Bay Conference Facility/Sundial Bridge through more walkable and bikable network of streets. The central downtown core was studied to look at reopening streets through the existing mall promenade to create opportunities for a more vibrant downtown and a stronger sense of place, along with a unified parking and implementation plan. SERVICES PROVIDED • Planning • Public Facilitation • Site Analysis • Implementation Strategies • Streetscape Design SERVICES PROVIDED • Public Facilitation • Site Analysis • Illustration 28 29 CONCEPT 3: CUSTOM FOLDED-STEEL BOARD SIGNS WITH CUSTOM GRAPHICS Briarpark Drive NEXT SIGNAL S. Gessner NO RIGHT TURN NO ENTRY NO ENTRY NO PARKING ANYTIME COMPLETELY CUSTOM SIGNAGE AND GRAPHICS BENEFITS: ICONIC SIGNAGE, FULLY CUSTOM-DESIGNED, MOST OPPORTUNITY FOR BRANDING CHALLENGES: MOST EXPEN-SIVE TO INSTALL AND REPLACE. This iteration shows what signage could look like with completely custom graphics where available. The sign boards are made out of a single piece of aluminum cut on a diagonal at the top and bent backward to create stability. The aluminum board is powder coated a matte black with white vinyl lettering applied to it for maximum legibility. Each sign board would/ could feature a version of the Westchase pattern at the bottom. Speed limit, tollway, and signs with height-requirements would remain at a legally required height. While the most expensive, this method of signage is most iconic to completely tie back into the overall identity of Westheimer as a street and as a district. 8 | Chapter Title STREET SIGNAGE FAMILY WESTHEIMER ROAD SIGNAGE PLAN MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? WESTHEIMER ROAD SIGNAGE PLAN MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN?MISSINGSIGN? WESTHEIMER ROAD SIGNAGE PLAN DESIGN WORKSHOPWESTCHASE DISTRICT SIGNAGE & MONUMENTATION MASTER PLAN HOUSTON, TEXAS Located in vibrant West Houston and growing up around the Sam Houston Tollway/Beltway 8, the Westchase District was in desperate need of a branding refresh. The existing branding guidelines were designed back in the mid-nineties when the district’s footprint and management team was one-fourth the size it is today. With the exponential growth in size and population the Westchase District turned to Design Workshop for three new streetscape designs and a master plan for branding through monument, wayfinding, and signage design. Existing signage and monuments were designed and fabricated in the most cost-effective manner. As a result, both follow a one-size- fits-all approach and are now dwarfed by the building development in West Houston. Design Workshop performed a complete and thorough SWOT analysis of the district, conducting population, demographic, traffic flow, and usage studies to determine key points for monumentation. From there, the team determined that a variety of sign types and monument sizes would be necessary to create meaningful impact in each key location. SERVICES PROVIDED • Landscape Architecture • Urban Design • Signage & Wayfinding Design MULTI-MESSAGE RENDERING FRONT VIEW LEFT, RIGHT, AND REAR VIEW PLAN VIEW PERSPECTIVE 30 31 Cherry Creek North is a premier outdoor retail mixed-use center in central Denver. Together with the Cherry Creek Mall it has become the most popular tourist destination in Denver and it has always been well-loved by locals for its urban village ambiance and mix of small independent shops and national retailers. In 2007 the Business Improvement District members voted to approve $18.5 million in bonds for capital improvements. Design Workshop, in association with Henry Beer, redesigned this iconic shopping district. One of the challenges was to make improvements to the district without destroying the assets that were still viable. The process involved a wide range of stakeholders including the BID members—which now includes small independent store owners, major national retailers, a luxury hotel operator, office managers, residents and developers—the surrounding residential organizations, the City and County of Denver and the Cherry Creek Mall. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture • Signage & Wayfinding • Construction Observation TOP 10 MOST VIBRANT SHOPPINGDISTRICTS CHERRY CREEK NORTH WAS NAMED ONE OF THE IN THE UNITED STATES BY USA TODAY. ASLA COLORADOMERIT AWARD FOR DESIGN 2011 WINNER DENVERMAYOR’SAWARD RECIPIENT OF THE DESIGN WORKSHOPCHERRY CREEK NORTHSTREETSCAPES & FILLMORE PLAZA DENVER, COLORADO 32 33 KATALYSTCLEVELAND PLAN-EUCLID AVE CLEVELAND, OHIO For the Downtown Cleveland Master Plan, the design team created a place-based vision by adopting an overall strategy of converting issues to assets, filling the gaps, and generating synergies centered on the importance of Euclid Avenue in the renaissance of downtown. Vital to the implementation of this vision, a new bus rapid transit (BRT) system was needed on Euclid Avenue, and a center-lane configuration was adopted to create the optimum interface for successful and vibrant retail. Through repositioning districts and establishing new districts in downtown, distinct neighborhoods were created, interconnected to each other through transit, great streets, and a renewed focus on Lake Erie and the Cuyahoga River. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design 34 35 KATALYSTEAST 4TH STREET CLEVELAND, OHIO As a result of the Downtown Cleveland Master Plan, the future of downtown pointed toward a fundamental shift to the creation of neighborhoods and districts connected along key transportation corridors. East 4th Street, a one-block, 40-foot-wide street between Euclid Avenue and Prospect Street became an important location in the Gateway District of downtown. Located one block from the Quicken Loans Arena, home of the Cleveland Cavaliers, and one block from Progressive Field, home of the Cleveland Indians, and in close proximity to other cultural amenities in downtown, the goal of East 4th Street was to create a mixed use, retail and entertainment destination with residential units above. House of Blues sits as an anchor to an eclectic mix of retail tenants offering a food experience that is one-of-a-kind in Cleveland. With more than 250 different landowners, the project took more than a decade to implement, illustrating the importance of having a strong vision, belief in that vision, and the commitment to see it through. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design 36 37 KATALYSTHERITAGE FIELDS TOD DISTRICT IRVINE, CALIFORNIA Heritage Fields TOD District, awarded from a national competition, is a transit-oriented, mixed-use neighborhood that creates a system of urban green spaces and great streets that connect pedestrians to the Irvine Transit Center and Orange County Great Park. The district is divided by the rail corridor servicing Metrolink, commuter rail, and Amtrak with 30’ of grade separating both sides. The district plan focused the greatest densities in the “crescent-shaped” land north of the tracks and urban, lower density development in the south, all connected along the district’s main boulevard, Marine Way. Development is oriented to activate streets and public spaces, collectively designed to promote pedestrian-friendly streets and enhanced quality of life. Development in the crescent is oriented around a linear public promenade with the Great Park as one terminus and a proposed new center as the other terminus. As the southern terminus, the new transit center is positioned over the tracks, utilizing a series of connected public spaces and private development around the center to transition to the lower density neighborhoods south of the tracks. This allows the Irvine Transit Center to become the mixed use cultural heart of the district neighborhood, physically linking both sides of the tracks and becoming the iconic gateway to the Great Park. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design 38 39 KATALYSTLAKE ELSINORE MASTER PLAN LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA The Lake Elsinore Downtown Master Plan created a vision, form- based code and guidelines for the creation of a revitalized downtown area. Main Street, as the “great street” of downtown, became the organizing element for creating five walkable districts: Gateway District, Garden District, Cultural District, Historic District, and Waterfront District. The Downtown Master Plan places great emphasis on the quality of the public realm and its role in creating an integrated urban fabric. From the 15 Freeway gateway entry, Main Street’s entire public realm culminates at the waterfront with the creation of a world class waterfront park and pier. This establishes the lake as the most valuable resource within downtown, both from an environmental perspective and as an economic generator. SERVICES PROVIDED • Urban Design 40 41 FEHR & PEERSHUNTINGTON PARK COMPLETE STREETS PLAN HUNTINGTON, CALIFORNIA FEHR & PEERSOCCOG ORANGE COUNTY COMPLETE STREETS ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Fehr & Peers led a team preparing the City of Huntington Park’s Complete Streets Plan. Following an existing conditions analysis, we conducted a series of outreach meetings to familiarize ourselves with project partners, local stakeholders, problem areas, and opportunity areas, and to identify strategies for enhancing community engagement for all stakeholders. A significant component of the community engagement process included a bilingual community charrette process that is intended to create a digestible, implementable, and easily understandable plan for the City of Huntington Park. This included recommendations for making local streets complete through conceptual designs, recommendations and development standards for specific improvements, streetscape recommendations, and policies and programs that will enhance safety, design, and the capacity of local streets to serve various travel modes, such as people walking, biking, driving, and taking transit. Fehr & Peers, as part of a team, supported the Orange County Complete Streets Initiative undertaken by the Orange County Council of Governments. The objective of the final Design Handbook was to support the phased enhancement of Orange County’s street system to accommodate growing multi-modal transportation needs as the county redevelops and invests in transit improvements, bikeway facilities, and mixed-use/transit oriented development. Fehr & Peers is supporting the team by engaging with Orange County jurisdictions, local stakeholders, and the general public. Fehr & Peers also helped in reviewing existing Federal, State, and local policies and guidance regarding Complete Streets, assisting with the development of a needs assessment survey, and providing expert technical input that included design components for all forms of transportation and street typologies. Fehr & Peers also helped with the development of a companion document, the Orange County Complete Streets Initiative Funding Toolkit. This toolkit provides guidance for jurisdictions on the fundamentals of funding for Complete Streets plans and projects in Orange County. Fehr & Peers provided expertise on costing information for retrofitting and building Complete Streets and created several case studies describing successful grant and funding opportunities that have supported Complete Street efforts across the region. SERVICES PROVIDED • Transportation Planning • Community Outreach SERVICES PROVIDED • Transportation Planning 42 43 LINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NE SCOPE OF WORK 03 ORCHARD TOWN CENTER | Westminster, CO 45 PHASE 1 INVENTORY & ANALYSIS TASK 1: STRATEGIC KICK OFF MEETING Our team will meet with the City of La Quinta staff for half a day to: • Finalize the schedule for the project. • Finalize communication plan, methods, schedules and expectations. • Outline the project vision, goals and objectives. • Identify critical success factors (those factors that must be addressed for the project to be considered a success). • Identify a project steering committee who are a diverse group of stakeholders. • Identify data needs and availability including base maps, GIS Data, and CAD Plans. • Tour the Study Area and solicit input on the points above while in the field. TASK 1 DELIVERABLES • Project schedule • Team directory • Project Vision, Goals and Project Critical Success Factors • Project Management Plan • Meeting agenda for and minutes from the kick-off meeting • Identification of a Project Steering Committee TASK 1 MEETINGS • Kick-Off Meeting (One half day face-to-face) TASK 2: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TASK 2.1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The consultant team will base its plan recommendations on a thorough understanding of what people value – or don’t – about the corridor; how those values can be expressed in built forms; and what changes people believe would influence life in this area for the better. The community process for this project will take an inclusive and cumulative approach that blends active community engagement and practical, effective use of resources. Community engagement will involve a full range of stakeholders, including but not limited to: • Community-based organizations • Local utility agencies • Residents and neighborhood groups • City Officials from: Community Services Commission, Housing Commission, Financial Advisory Commission, Planning Commission, City Council. • City Staff from: City Manager’s Office, Community Resources, Design and Development, Facilities, Finance and Public Safety. • Local business owners • Representative from the development community • Property owners • Employers • Local advocacy groups • School district representatives • Cal Trans • The Desert Recreation District • Riverside County Parks The goal of stakeholder engagement will be to gather a representative cross-section of community interests and concerns. TASK 2.2: PUBLIC WORKSHOPS We propose three workshops within the overall process. • Workshop #1 will be a Design Week focused on detailed design of the short-term catalyst sites identified in the ULI TAP Report. This workshop may also look at other design visioning for Highway 111 and other places if time allows. (See Task 4 for detailed description). • Open House #1 will be a presentation of plan alternatives for the entire study area including catalyst sites and for the public realm. • Open House #2 will present the preferred plan and implementation strategies for the entire study area including catalyst sites and the public realm. Design Workshop has received many awards for our public engagement processes, which are specifically tailored to the culture and needs of each community. We understand how important it is to listen, gain an understanding, and come to a consensus about the opportunities that exist for a corridor’s transformation. From a community standpoint, citizens need to feel that their voice is heard, and evidence of their preferences can be found in the resulting plan. The plan needs to have enough buy-in by the public, so the City Council and Planning Commission can feel confident that the conclusions from the public process are consistent with public desire. Our team of certified and experienced facilitators are prepared to provide the know-how and means to engage the public. At all workshops, the Design Workshop team will employ the use of appropriate digital technology to help facilitate input and collaboration from the community on design and planning alternatives. Our team will prepare display materials, presentations, and handouts using easy-to-understand graphics and text. Our expertise is presenting information in such a way that large amounts of technical data can be absorbed and understood quickly by the average citizen. We have expertise in utilizing a variety of different techniques for soliciting public engagement: • Keypad polling • Table discussions • Visual preference surveys • Design charrettes • Creative writing We will develop a summary report regarding the workshops and identify critical information and issues generated from these sessions. TASK 2.3: MULTIMEDIA CAMPAIGN In addition to meetings and workshops, information will be provided to the public through a website link to project materials and the ability for the public to engage the planning process with online surveys. Other multi-media campaign strategies include article writing media announcements, TV press interviews, flyers, newsletters, social media platforms and mailers. The DW team will develop graphic content for multimedia outreach for the duration of the project. TASK 2 DELIVERABLES • Meeting agendas • Promotional and media blast materials • Presentation materials for the workshops and other meetings • Meeting notes from workshops, one-on-one interviews • Surveys (online and print surveys) • Survey summary results TASK 2 MEETINGS (SEE TASKS BELOW FOR TIMING) • Three (3) Public Workshops »Design Week Workshop (Workshop 1 – 5 days) »Alternative Vision (Workshop 2 – 1 day in person meeting) »Implementation Workshop (Workshop 3 – 1 day in person meeting) • Five (5) Steering Committee Meetings (phone and in person during workshops) • Eleven (11) Meetings with Staff (phone and in person) • Three (3) Approval Meetings (Planning Commission and City Council) TASK 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS TASK 3.1: EXISTING PHYSICAL & PLANNED CONDITIONS Prior to Workshop 1 we will review and summarize all necessary existing planning and design documents to understand potential opportunities and constraints for the study area and how previous studies relate to the desire to create a Corridor Plan for the two-mile stretch of Highway 111. We will perform an existing conditions analysis, including a site visit the same day as the Strategic Kick Off Meeting in Task 1 above. The existing conditions analysis will include maps and diagrams of the following information: • Existing land use and zoning including easements, setbacks, rights of way • Land ownership patterns (need to understand land ownership and status of vacant lands) • Building/lot condition, including: »Age »Condition »Occupancy (Vacant or not) »Development Potential (based on existing lot size/accessibility and zoning) »Property value • Approved and proposed projects • Transportation facilities, circulation and access (sidewalks and street widths, parking areas, bicycle access, curb cut locations, transit routes and amenities) • Performing and under performing land uses along the corridor • Parks, public uses and open spaces; historic cultural resources • Existing streetscape amenities (including benches, public art – murals and free standing, ADA accommodations) • Important site amenities and public spaces, and view and scenic opportunities 46 47 • Access to utilities and infrastructure • Topography • Drainage • Vegetation • Views • Utilities, or future utility possibilities • Stormwater management facilities and strategy • Right of way and lane widths • Crash and pedestrian accident locations • Circulation and access • Signalization • Access Management Plan on Standards • Planning regulations • Sensitive environmental features • Important amenities along or near the corridor TASK 3.2: STRATEGIC ECONOMIC, MARKET & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The consultant team will perform a comprehensive market study and economic analysis of the Highway 111 Corridor to examine existing conditions, understand market trends and to identify opportunities for future development and redevelopment. The consultant team will draw from the findings of the analysis for the design of the short-term catalyst sites and for the land use, design and implementation recommendations. The Concord Group will lead the analysis. The Concord Group will assess the Highway 111 Corridor and the surrounding area to gain an understanding of the physical conditions and how the corridor connects surrounding neighborhoods. The site assessment will also qualify and/or validate the short-term catalyst sites identified in the ULI TAP as well as other sites of vacant or underutilized properties where development would likely have the most catalytic impacts. The consultant team will review relevant existing studies and findings relative to the local real estate and development market. The team will participate in key stakeholder meetings, particularly with real estate brokers, economic development officials, developers and major property owners, to understand the corridor’s opportunities and to understand factors which have hindered development or redevelopment. As part of this review, The Concord Group will facilitate input from the ULI SDRC. The team will prepare an economic base and market opportunity analysis for residential (for-sale and rental), office/business, hospitality and commercial uses (including local and visitor serving retail and entertainment). The overview will profile current and potential future market trends, including demographic and lifestyle trends, as well as local and regional real estate market conditions. The analysis will consider La Quinta’s future growth potential to attract new development to the Highway 111 Corridor. The analysis will assess the competitive position of the area compared to other commercial locations where new development has clustered in recent years. Based on this analysis, the consultant team will formulate recommendations for how much development can built and absorbed while ensuring sales tax and other municipal revenue sources are preserved. After one round of consolidated edits and comments, the consultant team will revise the draft and prepare a final Strategic Economic, Market and Financial Analysis. This will be included in the final document memorandum and will culminate with a series of recommendations, including: • Identification of possible redevelopment sites ((short- term, medium-term and long-term). • Realistic expectations regarding development timing and phasing. • The market feasibility of various land uses and product types (including “top line” developer revenues/values, “bottom line” land values, and tax generation to the City). • Conditions that need to be in place to stimulate development and redevelopment. • Strategies to ensure preservation, and ideally enhancement, of the City’s tax revenues. The final draft will reflect close coordination across all members of the consultant team in order to integrate transportation, land use and market analyses. TASK 3.3: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS We will conduct a transportation review of existing conditions and for future preferred concepts for the study corridor, for the following topics: Auto Circulation – Traffic counts will be used along with an assessment of the street hierarchy and access patterns to define the existing functions of the Highway 111 Corridor (through-traffic versus local access), key traffic generators, parking and key access routes. The City will provide current traffic count information for the corridor and will supplement this data with any additional available traffic data from the State or County. Existing Level of Service and queue spillback conditions will be reviewed. Consideration will also be given to the existing and the potential road section of the Highway 111 Corridor with respect to its various sections and as needed to balance the traffic demand within the context of creating of a vibrant mixed-use environment and visually consistent corridor. We will also consider other critical components of street functionality such as ingress and egress, access management, median conditions, signalization, existing speeds and other conditions to develop a full and clear picture of existing automobile use and circulation opportunities and constraints. Transit Circulation – Existing Public Transit will be reviewed and analyzed along and crossing the study corridor. Ridership boarding will be summarized based on information from the Transit Agency. We will identify and describe all existing, planned, and proposed transit services that operate or could operate to, from, and within the communities along Highway 111. Pedestrian Circulation – Pedestrian trip generators (land uses, transit stops, parking areas) will be inventoried. Counts and observations will be made of pedestrian activity. Barriers to pedestrian travel and overall pedestrian conditions (interface with traffic, traffic signalization, and compatibility of adjacent land uses and building façades) will be inventoried. Bicycle Circulation – Trip generators (land uses, transit stops, parks) will be reviewed. Observations will be made on a route-by-route basis. Barriers to bicycle travel and overall bicycle conditions (interface with traffic, compatibility of adjacent land uses, traffic signalization and available parking and end-of-trip facilities) will be inventoried. Other data that will be reviewed will include: • Collision data available in the Crossroads data base for the most current three years available; • The City’s latest edition of the Capital Improvement Program for the Corridor; and • The latest draft of CVAG’s Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project - Traffic Signal Interconnect Master Plan. This plan includes the deployment and enhancement of advanced ITS technologies along the Corridor to facilitate autonomous and connected vehicle travel. TASK 3 DELIVERABLES • Existing Physical and Planned Conditions Plan • Strategic Economic, Market and Financial Analysis • Traffic Analysis TASK 3: MEETINGS • One (1) Steering committee meeting • Two (2) Meetings with staff to discuss existing conditions and to prepare for Design Week (Go-To Meeting) PHASE 2 VISIONING TASK 4: DESIGN WEEK – PRIMARY FOCUS ON CATALYST PROJECT(S) & STREET DESIGN The first step in preparing a vision for the Highway 111 Corridor is to lead a “Design Week” at City Hall or at a suitable location near the study area. The Design Week will focus on the short-term catalyst sites identified in the Urban Land Institute TAP report by preparing detailed conceptual designs for these sites. Accompanying the site design will be massing models, perspective sketches and diagrams. We will prepare design alternatives during the day, working shoulder to shoulder with City Staff and Steering Committee members. In the evening the public will be invited to review the concepts and to interact with the design team so their preferences can be made known. While the design team is preparing design alternatives, the economics team will be refining their initial economic and market analysis and giving development program recommendations to the designers. The economics team will be working with City Staff on identifying implementation strategies and discussing redevelopment opportunities with property owners and developers. The transportation team will be refining their initial transportation existing conditions report and making design recommendations for Highway 111 and for the other streets within the study area. The transportation team will be meeting with representatives from Cal Trans, La Quinta Public Works, and representatives from CV Link to listen to the goals and concerns of these agencies. At the conclusion of the design week the plans and concepts will be packaged into a summary booklet. Preferred plans will be paired with specific recommendations for how to achieve implementation. These visions will become the basis for completing the remaining part of the City’s desired Area Plan for Highway 111. TASK 4 DELIVERABLES • Conceptual site plans drawn during a week-long workshop focused on the short-term catalyst sites identified in the ULI TAP report. 48 49 • Conceptual street section alternatives exploring reconfiguration of Highway 111 and other streets in the study area • Economic / market meetings with key stakeholders • Transportation / mobility meetings with key stakeholders • Facilitation of public open house in the evenings (3 evenings) TASK 4 MEETINGS • One (1) week-long public workshop “Design Week” • One (1) Steering committee meeting (one during design week, and one after design week) (Go-To Meeting) • One (1) Meeting with staff to evaluate outcomes from Design Week (Go-To Meeting) TASK 5: AUDIT OF CURRENT CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Using the conceptual plans produced during Design Week the Design Workshop team will start by evaluating the existing development standards, design guidelines, and specific plan standards. We will look for where the conceptual designs for the catalyst sites are in conflict with the standards and propose alternatives, so the catalyst sites can be developed without the need to ask for variances or modifications. We will then review the development standards for areas not addressed during Design Week to further identify what is outdated, restrict creativity and economic development, and what is incompatible with the plan vision. TASK 5 DELIVERABLES • Evaluation of existing development standards. • Recommendation for changes required to stimulate development / redevelopment according to the vision. TASK 5 MEETINGS • One (1) Meeting with staff discuss recommendations (Go-To Meeting) TASK 6: COMPLETE STREETS RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the input from the design week, the desired land use vision and the transportation report, the design team will prepare recommendations for the design and configuration of Highway 111 and the other streets running through the study area, including: • Avenue 48 • Washington Street • La Quinta Center Drive • Adams Street • Auto Center Way • La Quinta Drive • Dune Palms Drive • Jefferson Street • CV Link The street design solutions will attempt to prioritize modes of mobility to achieve the optimal street design configurations. The streets will be designed according to the future vision of the study area, so they are contextually appropriate to the future and not to existing conditions. TASK 6 DELIVERABLES • Schematic street section alternatives exploring reconfiguration of Highway 111 and other streets in the study area. • Proposed circulation hierarchy plan for study area showing vehicular, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation. TASK 6 MEETING • Two (2) meetings with staff to complete streets plan (Go-To Meeting) TASK 7: CORRIDOR PUBLIC REALM DESIGN TASK 7.1 CORRIDOR BRANDING Design Workshop will create a brand identity for the project. This will include a definition of core principles and target audiences and will result in a distillation of the project vision into a compelling name and cohesive visual system that expresses the spirit of the redeveloped corridor. TASK 7.1 SIGNAGE & WAYFINDING TASK 7.2.1 CORRIDOR SIGNAGE & CITY ENTRY MONUMENT DESIGN Design Workshop believes in delivering user-friendly wayfinding and signage design reflecting the personality of La Quinta in accordance with the branding of the corridor. We will share a visual survey through collection of precedent images to understand the visual style Highway 111 is looking for and how the aesthetic will work with the surrounding architecture and landscape architecture environment. We believe good wayfinding and signage design allows diverse user groups including vehicle, pedestrian, and cyclists to easily find their destination through clarity of sign types, sign messaging and consistently-branded elements. We will produce corridor signage concept designs and develop a sign program that establishes a clear and consistent set of design elements, so they are clearly identifiable as being from a single, memorable place. TASK 7.2.2 RETAIL SIGNAGE GUIDELINES With the design direction of Highway 111 branding and signage, Design Workshop will share a visual survey that demonstrates the possibilities for retail signage at Highway 111. We will produce a visual design guidelines for the future retail development at Highway 111. TASK 7.3: LANDSCAPE DESIGN The Design Workshop team will provide a plan for revamping the corridor landscape unifying it visually and providing human comfort even in the hottest months of the year. The design for the public realm will be based on outcomes from the public engagement. The team will establish an appropriate palette of trees, shrubs, groundcover, other landscape materials, site furnishings, and lighting consistent with Corridor branding and wayfinding. The landscape vision will be incorporated into the street sections proposed during Task 6. Once the landscape character is established, the team will create landscape guidelines incorporating low- water requirements so property owners have a clear understanding for how to comply with the desired vision. TASK 7 DELIVERABLES • Branding: »Define the primary vision elements, proposed target audiences and naming considerations »Brand paradigms exercise and competitive positioning »Outline core principles to guide the overall brand development »Establish a general style direction and approach • Project Naming: »Development of initial naming options »Work session to discuss alternatives and capture feedback »Generate refined naming options »Confirm final name selection • Logo Design: »Precedent images to discuss visual style of logo design »Create initial logo design concepts »Discussion and feedback on logo alternatives »Refine logo designs and finalize the preferred option »Prepare final artwork • Existing Signage Analysis: »Review existing signage-related documents »Inventory future user travel routes »Identification of seasonal events • Precedent images for stakeholders to understand options for corridor signage and retail signage: »Scale »Sign types »Materials/colors »Lighting »Structure • Corridor Signage Design representing: »Sign Types »Location »Quantity »Size »Structure »Material/Colors »Lighting »Landscaping context • Retail Signage Design Guidelines indicating: »Sign Types »Location »Quantity »Size »Material/Colors »Lighting options • Rendered conceptual site plan for the public realm within the study area. The plan will show: »Street lanes »Bike paths / lanes »Walks and trails »Wayfinding / branding structures »Landscape including: existing trees, proposed trees, planting beds, location of turf »Site furnishings including: seating, shade structures »Pole lighting 50 51 • Identification of potential funding sources / mechanisms. • Recommended changes to public policy /regulations • Recommendations of future planning efforts to be undertaken separately from the Highway 111 Area Plan. • Compilation of all deliverables, reports and analysis into a Highway 111 Area Plan Booklet. TASK 10 MEETINGS • One (1) Go-To Meeting to discuss implementation strategies with staff • Steering Committee Meeting to discuss implementation strategies PHASE 4 PROJECT ADOPTION TASK 11: PUBLIC HEARINGS The team shall attend one Planning Commission and up to two (2) City Council Public Hearings for adoption of the final versions of the Area Plan. Design Workshop shall be responsible for providing the presentation content to City staff for incorporation into the City’s public hearing formats, staff reports, etc. TASK 11 MEETINGS • Two (2) Meetings with Planning Commission • One (1) Meeting with City Council TASK 7 MEETINGS • One (1) Public Workshop to show design options • One (1) Steering Committee meeting to prepare for public workshop (Go-To Meeting) • Two (2) Go-To Meetings with staff to discuss massing model and renderings (Go-To Meetings) PHASE 3 IMPLEMENTATION TASK 8: DEVELOPMENT / REDEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE Based on visioning at the Design Week, our audit of the City’s Development Standards, an understanding of the market conditions and the input of stakeholders and the general public, we will prepare guidance for redevelopment and new development along the corridor. The team will prepare development standards and building typology standards for all properties in the study area, ensuring clarity and giving the private sector confidence that entitlements will be expedited if the rules are followed. We will prepare appropriate revisions to the City’s development codes and adopted standards, including: • Regional Commercial, Commercial Park, Mixed Use Overlay. • Nonresidential code revisions that include but are not limited to parking, nonresidential development standards, nonresidential permitted uses, and signs • Existing Corridor- Specific Plans The code will include: • Building frontage requirements for new construction • Building placement and parking configuration for new development or renovated parcels • Parking requirements • Building mass – bulk, height, articulation • Materiality based on existing adjacencies TASK 8 DELIVERABLES • Revisions to City’s development code for the study area. Our revisions will focus on components that impact physical design. Staff will refine our drafting of the code to comply with City ordinances and policies. TASK 8 MEETINGS • One (1) meeting with staff to discuss code revisions and recommendations (Go-To Meeting). TASK 9: PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS Our next step will be to create a computer massing model of feasible redevelopment of the study area based on all previous tasks. From the massing model we will work with City Staff to choose five key perspective views showing proposed design for streets, landscape, wayfinding/signage, and new/redevelopment sites. Our renderings will convey form and character for vacant infill sites and intensified development/redevelopment opportunities within existing commercial centers, particularly surplus parking areas. We acknowledge the RFP is asking for photorealistic renderings and we will work with staff to determine the appropriate level of detail for the renderings to convey the character and quality of development while showing the appropriate level of detail so future architects will have flexibility in bringing creative solutions forward. TASK 9 DELIVERABLES • 3D massing model of key areas Highway 111 Corridor • Five (5) high-resolution perspective renderings (two bird’s eye – three ground level) TASK 9 MEETINGS • Two (2) Meetings with staff to discuss design recommendations • 1 (1) Public Workshop to Discuss Final Vision TASK 10: IMPLEMENTATION PLAYBOOK The next step will be to identify all necessary projects required to achieve the Vision for the Highway 111 Corridor. With the input from the steering committee the team will identify and prioritize the essential public and private projects deemed “Catalyst.” The Design Workshop team will provide a matrix indicating all the implementation projects for downtown including their pros and cons, their magnitude of costs, and their timeline for implementation. The implementation plan that will follow the ULI TAP terminology of short-, mid- and/or long-term approaches. The Design Workshop team will identify funding sources, and roles and responsibilities will be identified for each project. TASK 10 DELIVERABLES • Highway 111 Corridor Playbook. • Prioritize Catalyst Projects. • Identify the roles and responsibilities of the public and private sectors (including Downtown Lincoln Association or any other organization/company hired in this capacity). WAYNE FERGUSON PLAZA| Lewisville, TX 52 53 LINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NE SCHEDULE/TIMELINE, REFERENCES & COST PROPOSAL 04 SCOTTSDALE QUARTER | Scottsdale, AZ 55 2019 PROJECT PLAN JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT PHASE 1 - INVENTORY & ANALYSIS Task 1: Strategic Kick Off Meeting Task 2: Public Engagement Task 2.1 Stakeholder Engagement Open House #1 Design Alternatives Open House Open House #2 Preferred Plan Open House Task 2.2 Public Workshops Task 2.3 Multimedia Campaign Task 3: Existing Conditions Analysis Task 3.1 Existing Physical & Planned Conditions Task 3.2 Strategic Economic, Market & Analysis Task 3.3 Traffic Analysis PHASE 2 - VISIONING Task 4: Design Week Task 5: Audit of Development Standards Task 6: Complete Streets Recommendations Task 7: Corridor Public Realm Design Task 7.1 Corridor Branding Task 7.2 Signage & Wayfinding Task 7.3 Landscape Design PHASE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION Task 8: Development/ Redevelopment Guidance Task 9: Perspective Renderings Task 10: Implementation Playbook PHASE 4 - PROJECT ADOPTION Task 11: Public Hearings denotes meeting denotes worksession / public workshop SCHEDULE/TIMELINE REFERENCES FONTANA URBAN GREENING LANDSCAPE PLAN FONTANA, CALIFORNIA Shannon Casey, Senior Engineer City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, California 92335 909.350.6523 scasey@fontana.org ANGELS CAMP MAIN STREET ANGELS CAMP, CALIFORNIA Amber Collins, Executive Director Calaveras Council of Governments 444 E. Saint Charles Street, Suite A San Andreas, California 95249 209.754.2094 acollins@calacog.orga KINGS BEACH REVITALIZATION STREETSCAPE PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Peter Kraatz, Deputy Director of Public Works Placer County Dept of Public Works-Engineering Division 775 North Lake Blvd. Tahoe City, California 96145 530.581.6230 PKraatz@placer.ca.gov NORTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Al Zelinka, FAICP, City Manager City of Riverside 3900 Main St. Riverside, CA 92501 951.826.5771 azelinka@riversideca.gov 56 57 The fees are estimates based on our understanding of what is needed to achieve the City’s desired outcomes. To finalize the fees we will discuss each task with staff to have a thorough understanding of expectations. The fees will be finalized prior to beginning work. The tasks listed should be considered a “menu” of options. While cost is always a consideration in team selection we will be flexible and accommodating to both meet La Quinta’s project goals while working within the budget. COSTPROPOSAL FIRM DESIGN WORKSHOP THE CONCORD GROUP STAFF ROLE Principal-in- Charge Project Manager Planner / Designer Estimated Total Principal Senior Advisor Estimated TotalBILLING RATE/HR $300 $225 $110 $300 $150 PHASE 1 - INVENTORY & ANALYSIS Task 1: Strategic Kick Off Meeting 4 4 4 $2,540 4 $1,200 Task 2: Public Engagement Task 2.1 Stakeholder Engagement 6 24 24 $9,840 8 $2,400 Workshop #1 (see Task 4 for hours) Open House #1 Design Alternatives Open House 6 16 16 $7,160 Open House #2 Preferred Plan Open House 6 16 16 $7,160 Task 2.2 Multimedia Campaign 4 40 $5,300 Task 3: Existing Conditions Analysis Task 3.1 Existing Physical & Planned Conditions 8 8 32 $7,720 Task 3.2 Strategic Economic, Market & Analysis 2 2 $670 60 20 $21,000 Task 3.3 Traffic Analysis 2 2 $670 PHASE 1 - INVENTORY & ANALYSIS SUBTOTAL 30 76 136 $41,060 72 20 $24,600 PHASE 2 - VISIONING Task 4: Design Week 24 40 40 $20,600 24 24 $10,800 Task 5: Audit of Development Standards 2 8 16 $4,160 16 8 $6,000 Task 6: Complete Streets Recommendations 8 16 40 $10,400 Task 7: Corridor Public Realm Design Task 7.1 Corridor Branding 4 8 80 $11,800 Task 7.2 Signage & Wayfinding Task 7.2.1 Corridor Signage & City Entry Mon. Design 2 4 115 $14,150 Task 7.2.2 Retail Signage Guidelines 2 8 90 $12,300 Task 7.3 Landscape Design 24 60 80 $29,500 PHASE 2 - VISIONING SUBTOTAL 66 144 461 $102,910 40 32 $16,800 PHASE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION Task 8: Development/Redevelopment Guidance 4 24 60 $13,200 Task 9: Perspective Renderings 4 40 80 $19,000 Task 10: Implementation Playbook 8 16 16 $7,760 PHASE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION 16 96 156 $39,960 PHASE 4 - PROJECT ADOPTION Task 11: Public Hearings 8 16 16 $7,760 PHASE 4 - PROJECT ADOPTION 8 16 16 $7,760 Reimbursables $8,500 KATALYST FEHR & PEERS ESTIMATED FEE Principal Urban Designer Urban Designer Estimated Total Principal Transportation Engineer Estimated Total$250 $160 $275 $145 4 4 $1,680 $5,420 $12,240 4 4 $1,680 $8,840 $7,160 $5,300 16 16 $6,560 $14,280 4 4 $1,640 $23,310 8 40 $8,000 $8,670 8 8 $8,200 52 40 $11,320 $80,300 40 40 $16,400 15 $4,125 $51,925 8 8 $3,280 $13,440 8 20 $5,100 $15,500 15 $4,125 $4,125 $11,800 $14,150 $12,300 $29,500 48 48 $19,680 38 20 $13,350 $152,740 24 24 $9,840 $23,040 $19,000 $7,760 24 24 $9,840 $49,800 $7,760 $7,760 $8,500 58 59 LINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NELINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NELINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NELINCOLN P STREET | Lincoln, NE APPENDIX 05 THE DOMAIN | Austin, TX 61 NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal I, __________________________________ (name) hereby declare as follows: I am ______________________________ of _________________________, (Title) (Company) the party making the foregoing proposal, that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from proposing; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any other proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the agreement of anyone interested in the proposed agreement; that tall statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative hereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Proposer Signature: _______________________________________ Proposer Name: _______________________________________ Proposer Title: ______________________________________ Company Name: _______________________________________ Address: _______________________________________ Services until receiving prior written authorization (in the form of a written change order if Contracting Party is a contractor performing the Services) from the Contract Officer, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer’s written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in “Exhibit D” (the “Special Requirements”), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2. COMPENSATION. 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with “Exhibit B” (the “Schedule of Compensation”) in a total amount not to exceed Dollars ($) (the “Contract Sum”), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party’s rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of - Jim MacRae a Principal Design Workshop, Inc. Jim MacRae Principal Design Workshop, Inc. 724 South Spring Street Suite 701 Los Angeles,CA 90014 NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM CONSIDERATIONS/EXCEPTIONS TO THE STANDARD AGREEMENT For the text highlighted in red below, Design Workshop requests that the number of meetings be confirmed within the final contractual agreement. 62 63 Exhibit F Indemnification F.1 Indemnity for the Benefit of City. a.Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b.Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party. c.Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any For the strike-through red text above, Design Workshop would request revising the current language as stated. procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices,equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 6. Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of the Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be liable for and shall pay to City the sum of One Thousand dollars ($1,000.00) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any of the Services required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance. In addition, liquidated damages may be assessed for failure to comply with the emergency call out requirements, if any, described in the Scope of Services. City may withhold from any moneys payable on account of the Services performed by Contracting Party any accrued liquidated damages. For the strike-through red text, Design Workshop is not able to accept the text as written. 64 65 provisions identical to those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit.Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligations to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. For the text highlighted in red, Design Workshop would need to confirm with our selected subconsulant team that they will accept all the indemnity language Design Workshop agrees to. provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contracting Party will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City Contracting Party. d.Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1.Applicability of this Section F.1(d). Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a “design professional” as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2.Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reimbursement of attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party.. 3.Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section F.1(d), the term “design professional” shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code §2782.8. F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with For the strike-through red text above, Design Workshop would request revising the current language as stated. 66 67 PROJECT SAMPLE 1 HIGHWAY 84 EAST DOTHAN, ALABAMA APPROACH Design Workshop is the lead consultant for the corridor master plan for 4.5 miles of a State Highway in Southeast Alabama. The project is rooted in the goal of economic transformation by establishing a clear vision and implementation strategy to retain business and to attract new development and investment. (see cutsheet above). SERVICES PROVIDED • Public Outreach • Corridor Planning • Urban Design • Public Realm Design 6968 HIGHWAY 84 EAST DOTHAN, ALABAMA 70 71 HIGHWAY 84 EAST DOTHAN, ALABAMA 72 73 HIGHWAY 84 EAST DOTHAN, ALABAMA 74 75 PROJECT SAMPLE 2 BROADWAY GALVESTON, TEXAS 80 | Implementation Strategies 81DRAFTDRAFT 9-Block Phasing Strategy STEP 01 [2018]: Corner (intersection) buildout STEP 01a [2019]: 1-block buildout STEP 01b [2020]: 3-9 block buildout STEP 02 [2021]: 9-block buildout + TXDOT ‘Mill + Overlay’ STEP 03 [2022]: Widened median with planted improvements and potential for recreational path STEP 03 [2038 option]: Transit-oriented corridor (with the potential for trolley network in median). This is, of course, contingent upon funds available to the City and future operation of Galveston’s trolley system. widened median 9- block buildout development + streetscape amenities streetscape mill and overlay Capital Improvement Project grouped street trees/ lights grouped street trees/ lights grouped street trees/ lights designated parking, protected crosswalks, restripe for narrow lanes existing development (adhere to regulations) designated parking, protected crosswalks, restripe for narrow lanes designated parking, protected crosswalks + median extension building above BFE + cafe space/ shade building above BFE + cafe space/ shade Figure 67: Catalyst Project Master Plan The diagram series below shows how the phasing strategy can be implemented over time, knowing that many existing buildings will remain in early project stages. Overtime, infill of new development will continue on the private side, while enhancements to the public realm will improve the streetscape environment and walkability of the Corridor. RECREATIONAL PATH AND WIDENED MEDIAN 78 | Implementation Strategies 79DRAFTDRAFT 9-block Catalyst Project Master Plan Figure 66: Catalyst Project Master Plan 34th Street33rd Street32nd Street31st Street30th Street9 10 10 2 2 11 7 4 10 9 6 1 1 3 2 10 11 15 6 4 4 10 9 15 3 7 2 16 6 11 4 16 16 16 9 7 29th Street28th Street27th Street26th Street25th Street16 2 1 3 11 7 9 15 15 10 10 1 LEGEND Pedestrian crosswalks Designated on-street parking with bulb-outs Signalized intersections Treewells Raingardens and bioswales Single-track trolley through median Median planting Texas Heroes Monument Surface parking Activated retail front Narrowed street lanes Median extensions Curb cuts Existing lots Existing alleys Build-to-line intersections 1 9 2 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 14 7 7 8 8 3 2 5 5 7 76 6 6 8 11 5 44 2 2 2 1 3 16 16 16 16 16 6 The plan above shows the 9-block catalyst project as visualized by the project team. This stretch of Broadway takes into account the two preferred catalytic corners of 25th and 34th, and the plan reinvisions the street in between. Key components of the plan include decreased crosswalk widths at the median, enhanced planting and provisions for shade along widened sidewalks, a recreational path down the widened median and private development infill that takes advantage of parking in the rear of the buildings where possible. The team took into consideration existing single family residential and historic structures when providing access management. The plan seeks to consolidate driveways on lots containing both adjacent street and Broadway access. It seeks to minimize driveway widths to 22-26’. The plan also encrouages formalized parallel parking along the corridor, which allows for curb extensions to decrease pedestrian crossing widths perpendicular to Broadway. The result is a public realm that seeks to balance uses, increases mobility for all, enhances the landscape and pedestrian zones, improves lighting along the street (both in the median and at back of curb) and provides overall enhancements to the charachter of the street. This plan showcases the potential for the entirety of Broadway to act not only as a Gateway to but an economic driver for the island. APPROACH Design Workshop led a multi-disciplinary team on the revitalization of Galveston’s main boulevard. (see cutsheet above) SERVICES PROVIDED • Public Outreach • Corridor Planning • Urban Design • Public Realm Design 76 77 PROJECT SAMPLE 2 BROADWAY GALVESTON, TEXAS 94 | Implementation Strategies 95 6% (R-1) 3% (HI) 3% (LI) 24% (UN) Existing Zoning / Land Use EXISTING ZONING STANDARDS BY USE In March, 2015, the City of Galveston adopted the Land Development Regulations that replaced the 1991 Zoning Standards. The planning codes adopted in the 2015 regulations document ordinances that guide development and redevelopment processes on the island, including but not limited to, zoning districts, appropriate land uses, yard, lot, setback, PUD (planned unit development), signage, subdivision development, lighting, parking, landscaping, Historic neighborhood standards and permit requirements. While the zoning ordinances provide an overlay for uses along Broadway, a majority of the coverage focuses heavily on commercial purposes (nearly 35%) and the ‘Urban Neighborhood’ category (24%), which inevitably carries similar development programs. It is important for the proposed standards to build on the Land Development Regulations, by seeking to understand, for example, the supply of commercial activity along Broadway in relation to the demand of the island’s current population (50,550 total, 2016). ZONING MAP AVAILABLE VACANT PARCELS 0          1000     2000                     4000 III •Development potential along the causeway and entry•Maintaining a continuous development fabric AVAILABLE VACANT PARCELS 0          1000     2000                     4000 III •Development potential along the causeway and entry •Maintaining a continuous development fabric 0’ 1000’ 2000’ 4000’ BROADWA Y S T 35th s t 32nd s t 27th s t 24th s t 17th s t Mar t in Lu the r K ing s t 7th s t11th s t 43rd s t Mike Ga ido s t46th s t 50th s t Post Office Galvesto n B a y Gulf of Mexico Sealy Ave L Chris topher Co lumbus Ave M1/2 Ave N1/2 SeawallWinnie Post Office Mechanic Harborside Pelican Island CausewayMary Moody Nor then 6 1 s t S t 5 9 t h S t 77 th S t 35% (C) 2% (CBD) 15% (RES/ REC) 12% (HZD) Source: City of Galveston, 2015 Land Development Regulations Figure XX: Zoning Map LEGEND Broadway Corridor/ Avenue J One-block Radius Height-Density of Development Zones (HDDZ) Commercial (C) Central Business District (CBD) Historic (R03) Industrial, Heavy (HI) Industrial, Light (LI) Resort/ Recreation (RES/REC) Urban Neighborhood (UN) Traditional Neighborhood (TN) Residential, SF (R-1) Residential, Duplex (R-2) Multifamily (MF) Residential, SF Detached (R-0) Figure 70: Zoning Standard by Use within Broadway’s one-block radius COMMERCIAL ZONING (C)URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD (UN)RESORT/ RECREATION (RES/ REC)HISTORIC (R-3) Figure 71: Zoning Standard by Use; Source: Land Development Regulations, 2015 - Note: Images and associated text are direct extracts from document. 122 | Implementation Strategies 123 T5 T 5a T4 SDT6 PUBLIC REALM CONDITIONS The pedestrian realm includes the entire area from back of curb to the building facade. It is made up of four zones: the Building Transition Zone, the Sidewalk Zone, the Street Furnishings Zone and the Planting Zone. Sidewalks are paved linear areas where pedestrians travel and congregate in a district. They provide a mainly functional purpose and are regulated by federal, state and local ADA compliance standards. These guidelines describe the desired character anticipated in the Sidewalk Zone. Broadway Guidelines should consider the following: •Ensure that the Street Furnishing and Planting Zone share the same right-of-way and are at least 5 feet. •Connect all new sidewalks to the existing sidewalks. •Construct the Sidewalk Zone of a continuous surface. •Construct sidewalks out of durable materials like concrete, brick and stone. This applies to standard, permeable and decoratively paved sidewalks. •Implement sidewalk bulbouts at intersections to shorten pedestrian crossing time in areas of high pedestrian traffic. •Confirm the sidewalk material shall be solid paving or pavers on concrete sub slab. Pavers shall be pre- cast pavers, non-clay. •Sidewalk grade shall not exceed 2 percent cross slope and 5 percent longitudinal per the City of Houston and Texas Accessibility Standards. •Provide expanded sidewalk areas, or “plazas,” where conditions permit. Work within existing extended rights-of-way or consider expansions to existing sidewalks at strategic locations. These expanded areas also provide space for clustering street furniture. Building Transition Zone SidewalkZone Street Furni s h i n gand Planting ZoneClear delineation between the sidewalk zone and the planting zone increases streetscape legibility for pedestrians.  Properly located building transition zone programming provides space for both sidewalk cafés and pedestrian travel.  Building transition zones that encroach on other areas within the pedestrian realm can be uncomfortable for pedestrians.  1 1 2 2 3 3 Figure 97: Recommended Public Realm Strategy Broadway Guidelines *RECOMMENDED SIGNAGE TYPES ALONG BROADWAY ZONES T5 T5 T5 T5T5a T 5a T 5a T 5aT4 T4 T4 T4SDSD SDT6T6T6 T6 TRANSIT POSTS MOUNTED OR HANGING SIGNS OUTDOOR CAFE BOARDS WALL MURAL SIGNWINDOW SIGN MAPS AND WAYFINDING SIGNAGE STANDARDS Signage and wayfinding elements have the ability to inform users of their surroundings. It is important to show branding and information at strategic points for user guidance (pedestrians, cyclists, cars and commuters). This can be achieved through the use of directional signage, branding and private business signs. It is vital to develop a cohesive and articulate system of signage elements that is a signature of the Broadway corridor. Recommendations in this section will provide general standards for signage, in addition to the 2015 Land Development signage regulations. *2015 LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE REGULATIONS City Signage Standards •Allowed: Flat signs limited to 1 sign per 42’ of building frontage not to ex- ceed 4 per business; Flat signs shall be located along street frontage on the wall of a building; Projected signs shall not exceed 1 per each street frontage not to exceed 40 sq ft; De- tached sign, 1 per each 200’ of street frontage not to exceed 60 sq ft. •Prohibited: Signs that no longer apply to business; signs with moving parts, signs with flags, ribbons, lights (not holiday or state/national flag); signs obstructing view; portable or wheeled signs; signs with blinking lights. *Note: 2015 Land Development regulations regarding signage maybe subject to additional and future wayfinding guidelines. Recommended signage types shall adhere to current City of Galveston regulations on allowed and prohibited signage. 1. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE •Informs people of their surroundings at strategic points along the corridor. •Displays directional information and are often regulatory in nature (bike signs, no parking, etc). 2. BRANDED SIGNAGE/ WAYFINDING •Directional signage that is branded for a sense of place. •Displays informational location about points of interest and distances to reach them. 3 . HANGING/ MOUNTED SIGNS •Displayed on private property to advertise goods or services. •Appropriate signs may be hanging or mounted displays. 4. BUSINESS BOARD DISPLAYS •Displayed on property to advertise goods or services. •Often displayed on stable and refined structural support. Figure 98: Allowed Signage Components 78 79 PROJECT SAMPLE 3 VAN PLAY: PLAN TO PLAY VANCOUVER, CANADA FIGURE 1 - BRANDING RESOURCE BRAINSTORM FIGURE 2 - FROM DESIGN TO REALITY FIGURE 3 - BRAND COLOR SWATCHES APPROACH Design Workshop is the lead consultant crafting a compelling brand for the project to connect the process to the community on a visceral level. From the design brief meetings, the team executed a series of branding exercises to develop a name for the master plan process (VanPlay) and resulting master plan (the Playbook) that connoted movement, vitality and health. The colors of the communication materials moved away from traditional parks and recreation greens to reflect the vibrant colors and dimensions of the landscapes of Vancouver. Silhouettes used in graphic communication were pulled from the gardens, beaches, parks and recreation activities of the city and its residents. The brand book ensures that the VanPlay identity is usable by anyone and everyone involved in the planning process to design assets that are immediately identifiable as being “of VanPlay” regardless of the designer, firm or city department involved. SERVICES PROVIDED • Park Master Planning • Public Outreach • Branding Design VibrancyVancouver-inspired VANTONEPretty in Purple VANTONEAboriginal Amber VANTONECrystal Blue Persuasion VANTONESkyline Teal VANTONETotally Tiffany VANTONE Hello Sunshine! VANTONEPure Purple VANTONEWe’re All Pink Inside VANTONEWhat Blue Sky? VANTONEPurple Pastel The team sought inspiration in the vibrant nature of Vancouver, visually and culturally. Hundreds of photographs representing color and culture were curated to become the brand’s color palette. 5 VanPink VANTONEWe’re All Pink Inside VANPLAY: FROM PLAN TO PLAY Next, the Park Board and design team developed a set of novel forms of community engagement that would not only spark interest in the plan but encourage people to get active in the city’s parks and the planning process. 8VANPLAY: FROM PLAN TO PLAY BRUSH STROKES STOPAT BODY FRAME WRAP 1-INCH INTOWHEEL WELL ENSURE FRONTWINDOW WRAP OPACITY IS 15% OR LESS DO NOT WRAPHOOD AND SCARF ENSURE CLEARANCEOF NO LESS THAN 2-INCHESAT BOTTOM OF VEHICLE on-roadoff-line, Inspired by a 1970’s Vancouver Park Mobile, the team developed a tour van for the VanTour. The Van hauls the Imagination Playground and functions as a moving billboard to generate and maintain top-of-mind attention on the campaign. 10VANPLAY: FROM PLAN TO PLAY FIGURE 4 - BRANDING GUIDELINES FIGURE 5 - BRANDING MATERIALS Playbookthe designer’s To expand the reach of the brand, the team developed a complete design standards manual to enable anyone and everyone involved in the planning process to design assets for public release, which maintained a cohesive and unified visual identity. 7VANPLAY: FROM PLAN TO PLAY VanBranded VanPlay The fact is Vancouver is one great city to live in. Here are the facts to prove it. #vanplay #vancouver #canada #vanplay #imagineparksandrec VanPlayVancouver Parks Board VanPlay Vancouver Parks Board 15 Since the campaign’s inception, over 1,000 individual pieces of content have been designed, developed, and released across every channel of communication for the VanPlay project, including a five-part lecture series, and VanSwag. VANPLAY: FROM PLAN TO PLAY 80 81 PROJECT SAMPLE 4 4 SIGNAGE GRAPHIC ELEMENTS TYPOGRAPHY SYMBOLS SIGNAGE ARROWSSIGNAGE COLORS BRIDGE (SYMBOL TO REFLECT FINAL BRIDGE DESIGN) CITY CENTRE GREY THEME OPTION PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TYPE 1 - DIAGONAL CAUTIOUSCROSSWALK EMERGENCYASSISTANT ECO-FRIENDLY TYPE 2 - SMOOTH PARKING CIVIC CENTER PARK CITY HALL Customized symbols for each destination on 84th Street to provide quick wayfinding in a fast traffic street, more symbols can be designed for the future developments. Simple symbol delivers a better user-friendly message system. Maven Pro is a type of san serif modern typeface that has unqiue curvature, provides distinguish legibility. The flowing ryhthm could soften a diagonal signage structure, yet also blend well with organic signage structure. The following graphic elements are recommended to express a clean and fast wayfinding family for the rennovated, fast-trafficed 84th Street. Customized arrows live harmonic with the overall signage struecture, font, and symbols. Color is a great way to categorize the purposes of different destinations. The combination of color and symbol provide a easier wayfinding for the developing street. The purpose of each color to be discussed with the client. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890 Maven Pro Black Maven Pro Bold Maven Pro Medium Maven Pro Regular COMMUNITY SURVEY PUBLIC MEETING #2 ACTIVE POLLING 84TH STREETSCAPEWAYFINDING DESIGN LA VISTA, NEBRASKA FIGURE 1 - RESULTS FROM PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FIGURE 2 - SIGN LOCATION PLAN FIGURE 3 - SIGNAGE GRAPHIC STANDARD APPROACH 84th Street is a 2-mile long street located in La Vista, Nebraska. Design Workshop has developed and designed a fresh streetscape for 84th Street. The street is distinguished by its iconic and welcoming design, comprehensive access and connection to emerging developments, the use of the most current technologies and practices, and by its provision for a harmonious coexistence of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and automobiles. A wayfinding and signage family was designed, inspired from an organic graphic line articulates the dynamic relationship between landscape forms and the street. Applying this organic form to various furnishings to make the form as an icon of 84th Street. SERVICES PROVIDED • Landscape Architecture • Urban Design • Signage & Wayfinding Design • Branding Design 2 SIGN LOCATION PLAN TL1 TL CROSSWALK SIGNALIZED CROSSWALK UNSIGNALIZED TL2 TL3 TL4 CW CW1 CW2 SIGN TYPES VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL SIGN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN DIRECTORY SIGN MULTI-PURPOSE STATION SIGN (BUS, METRO, UBER ETC.) INTERPRETIVE SIGN PARK IDENTITY SIGN CROSSWALK SAFETY SIGN S1 S2 S5 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S3S7 S7 S7 S5 S4 S4 S2 S5 S2 S3 S5S3 S3 S3 S4 S3 S2 S4S5 FIGURE 4 - RENDERED MODELS FOR BETTER DESIGN PRESENTATION FIGURE 5 - SIGNAGE FAMILY WITH SCALE 13 3D ILLUSTRATIVESCONCEPT 2 Civic CenterPark CITY CENTRE CIVIC CENTER PARK BRIDGE SHOPPINGCENTER84TH STREETFRONT VIEW BACK VIEW BIKE RACK TRASH/RECYCLE CONTAINER ICON IN PLANTING TOP VIEW SUGGESTED FURNISHING Organic graphic line articulates the dynamic relationship between landscape forms and the street. Applying this organic form to various furnishing in order to make the form as an icon of 84th Street. DIRECTORY SIGN DIRECTORY SIGN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN 15 VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL SIGN BUS/METRO STATION SIGN CROSSWALK SIGN INTERPRETIVESIGN FRONT VIEW INTERPRETIVESIGN SIDE VIEW PEDESTRIAN DIRECTINAL SIGNSTREET DIRECTORY SIGN The colorful beacon in between each black sign panel represents the profile of 84th street, with a branch running through the city hall. The whole street lives as the heart and future light in La Vista. Organic graphic line responses with landscape wall movement. The beacon creates safety feel to new visitors. SIGNAGE FAMILYCONCEPT 2 CITY OF LA VISTA UrbanScramble WE WILL NEVER FORGET SaturdayAugust 4 , 8AM PLAN PLAN PLAN84TH STREETCivic CenterPark CITY CENTRE CIVIC CENTER PARK BRIDGE CITY HALL PARKING CROSSWALK SHOPPINGCENTER CITY CENTRE CIVIC CENTER PARK BRIDGE CITY HALL PARKING CROSSWALK BUSMETRO HARRISONSTREET Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut 84th StreetPAST 51 CITY HALLNEXT STOP NEXT STOP29CITY CENTRE PICK-UP For more information about bus routes/schedules, please visit website:www.lavista.com or call 211. In case of emergency, call 911. CITY OF LA VISTA 0.5 miles PARKING 0.3 miles CIVIC CENTERPARK CITYHALL 0.6 miles 82 83 WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM DW LEGACY DESIGN® We believe that when environment, economics, art and community are combined in harmony with the dictates of the land and needs of society, magical places result–sustainable places of timeless beauty, significant value and enduring quality, places that lift the spirit. Design Workshop is dedicated to creating Legacy projects for our clients, for society and for the well-being of our planet.