Loading...
RatingsREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 �pp Consultant: 1� n Reviewer: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: �� " /I Understanding of work to be done 30 Project Approach 20 / 7 Pertinent Project Experience 15 J �- Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 l 2- Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 5� Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibl (Explanation) _Lf?C luCj; Comments:U TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: `K S C- Reviewer: `? 40, vk 't- . Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 Project Approach 20 Pertinent Project Experience 15 ; Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date J Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience -15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: extA�14 /tcso" 6&f pF C.L,1 Reviewer: &-t� SSA Lo Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: 03 /0 419 Understanding of work to be done 30 a Project Approach 20 i8 Pertinent Project Experience 15 11 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 r 3 Format/Organization 10 g Schedule 9 - r-^-0 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 9 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: D✓ML*kd I'•c�►�rC, G�ciLe/tl��jM �,cEY2C �4--S%t�'8�' Ae;C'lVavA L 51C.4-/ri CAwGe - bF' /,-, l k TOTAL i 9 Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: C � c Reviewer: <'IC!0 Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 Z Project Approach 20 JCS Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 y Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 4� Unique Qualities (Intangibles):, (Ex to cation) Gam, 5S �v JJ-r ILL v CU 14Af-r k z��Q Comments:i�'��+ ��L.:i'i!!1'1'�li •�J �)!n J� .I _. i, ��';f� I �`i'� i � �� �i �IV Reviewer's Signature j � �' r-�•� "U � z� �"�� OPT«N�'�� TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown. Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: Reviewer: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 30 ;! G Project Approach 20 P, Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 , J Format/Organization 10 7 Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 �r Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments•. o c) �} , Reviewer's Signature S%l� - -3/7-, TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: /0 c,,,Q 6-4 Reviewer: -��tAA Lo Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: D 3Z6 awl Understanding of work to be done 30 2 s— Project Approach 20 i& Pertinent Project Experience 15 1 2 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 /3 Format/Organization 10 to Schedule /0 5 Intangible Qualities 5 -8- Total 100 �Z Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) I DLuTI DASE( w� 7�.� ��t C�4LytlS A S C/3i¢r2 rso� Comments:_ S/�gS -�� i w d�srG,�/ X 44,DW w1ace5XftiN ©a 2 AoIXA-t-f (A 0V.4N7?:7c JA6 ✓ klG A f Reviewer's Signature ,,� 2-019 — M-4-A-r 22Zo TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: A/J J Reviewer: � Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 23 Project Approach 20 Co Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 I Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 3 Intangible Qualities 5 z Total 100 7,5— Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments:_ �r (' fJ02 AJ TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience -15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project - 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: I -I l(.Ui:,t . t , :Ln ;i; Reviewer: LJ, ( Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 Project Approach 20 Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 C_ Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 s Total 100 - Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: Reviewer: X6X1 525�&rl-A Lo Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: 04�g l ZD 1 9 Understanding of work to be done 30 7= Project Approach 20 ro Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 3 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: S _ "0" E Reviewer's Signature tico 12/b ,�z &-&cc S s' .a TOTAL 73 Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience -15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: /\J V(o 4e C- Reviewer: 1A Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: q Understanding of work to be done 30 zS Project Approach 20 Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 3 Intangible Qualities 5 3 Total 100 y51 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): l� (Explanation) C Comments: 1,6,.a A r7 (4,n 1 1 Reviewer's Signature r /� � dF r/IrC CC -fC'�(Rn.�YrYkG1 fit.lf�� TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant:_ Reviewer:, r Pr Date: Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 Z Project Approach 20 1 �- Pertinent Project Experience 15 1L. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 q 1 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 7_ Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: TOTAL Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: $,0 V,,L-ze Reviewer: 146W -5'ff&ymALV Date: b 3/ 30121L 9 Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 3 0 Project Approach 20 / g Pertinent Project Experience 15 J 2-- Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 !2- Format/Organization 10 1`� Schedule 4—M-o 5 3 Intangible Qualities 5 0 Total 100 8 IV ,:15t� Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) locwj�rcjE6 Op7Tui2AL P,ezJrt--&T- LS'S�El � SrGwac S tI6 CAL S(64aC .A.�`7 WW of SMI• W -5 YVC Comments: 02(- CMA k7- S Eb-xx-f 1,6 P #,-:4 V Y lnlS' ✓ MC ✓ TOTAL 9 3 Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: Reviewer. Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: Understanding of work to be done 30 ZZ-- Project Approach 20 /f Pertinent Project Experience 15 Z Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 / Format/Organization 10 g Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 y Total 100 '7 7 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) o)��-'� �. L L1�7C-fUG::.:'( Comments: G A Reviewer's Signature t-. 3 P weer - C TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work welljustified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: r\,-L 4L �e-, i Reviewer: ` L4iL Vt.; . � ❑ate: ?C .a Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Understanding of work to be done 30 L _ Project Approach 20 r :; Pertinent Project Experience 15 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 Format/Organization 10 Schedule 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: Reviewer's Signature 7e T-(S (,�� -C 3 TOTAL Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION Project Name: Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, Triple Left Turn Lanes Project, City Project No. 2017-01 Consultant: Apt" Reviewer: lei 56��Lo Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Date: 6 314a11-zo( 9 Understanding of work to be done 30 -�,-8 Project Approach 20 16 Pertinent Project Experience 15 13 Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub- consultants) 15 13 Format/Organization 10 /D Schedule 9 M o 5 Intangible Qualities 5 Total 100 g6 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): (Explanation) Comments: 5'" f — &T1,4- C C6�C� � CX S � (-,A tyA'a4 stAveyewc— ,r'7rsc� TOTAL 6 Reviewer's Signature ' Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Understanding of work to be done - 30 points maximum 0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Project Approach - 20 points maximum 0-8 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 9-15 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 16-20 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Pertinent Project Experience - 15 points maximum 0-4 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 5-10 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Personnel (Prime Consultant and Sub -consultants)- 15 Points Maximum 0-4 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project 5-10 points: Staff list includes resumes but experience is not relevant or similar. 11-15 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Format/Organization - 10 points maximum 0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Schedule - 5 points maximum 1-2: Schedule of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 3-4: Schedule of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 5: Schedule of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. Intangible Qualities - 5 points maximum Intangible qualities are those traits or abilities that are not included in the above categories.