Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
BRES2019-0147
78-495 CALLS TAMPICO C& 0 D CP Q9 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIT Permit Type/Subtype: BUILDING RESIDENTIAL/DWELLING - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED Application Number: BRES2019-0147 Property Address: 53494 ROSS AVE APN: 767680052 Application Description: LIVIN ON THE EIGHTH, LLC. /11,685SF DWELLING/VB/RES-3/CLASS Property Zoning: Application Valuation: $1,029,346.50 VOICE (760) 777-7125 FAX (760) 777-7011 INSPECTIONS (760) 777-7153 Owner: LIVIN ON THE EIGHTH, LLC. 53494 ROSS AVENUE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Date: 8/13/2019 Applicant: Contractor: HUGO CERVANTES P DISCOVERY BUILDERS CALIFORNIA INC DBA DB 14605 N 73RD STREET SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 AUG 13 2019 (480)624-5200 CITY OF LA QUINTA Llc. No.: 915336 -------------------------- DESIGN &DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT -------__--------------------------_------ LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 {commencing with Section 70001 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my License is in full force and effect. License Class: B '}License No.: 91533fi Date: CJ '�`Z Contractor: m OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that I am exempt from the Contractor's State License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county that requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for the permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's State License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).: (_) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does the work himself or herself through his or her own employees, provided that the improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). (_) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project. (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors' State License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for the projects with a contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractors' State License Law.). (_) I am exempt under Sec. . B.&P.C. for this reason Date: Owner: CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ. C.). Lender's Name: Lender's Address: WORKER'S COMPENSATION DECLARATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance oft rk for which this permit is issued. Sec YI have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by in 3700 of the Labor Cade, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Carrier: TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COIy EANY OF AMERICA Policy Number: UB4K0552021914G _ I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions. Date: r/3'l Applicant: WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL, AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000). IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IMPORTANT: Application is hereby made to the Building Official for a permit subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth on this application. 1. Each person upon whose behalf this application is made, each person at whose request and for whose benefit work is performed under or pursuant to any permit issued as a result of this application , the owner, and the applicant, each agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta, its officers, agents, and employees for any act or omission related to the work being performed under or following issuance of this permit. 2. Any permit issued as a result of this application becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 180 days from date of issuance of such permit, or cessation of work for 180 days will subject permit to cancellation. I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above - mentioned property/for inspection purposes. �f Date: /� �r Signature (Applicant or Agen , �"/ 2 -Date: 8/13/2019 Application Number: Property Address: APN: Application Description Property Zoning: Application Valuation: Applicant: HUGO CERVANTES BRES2019-0147 53494 ROSS AVE 767680052 LIVIN ON THE EIGHTH, LLC. /11,685SF DWELLING/VB/RES-3/CLASS $1,029,346.50 Owner: LIVIN ON THE EIGHTH, LLC. 53494 ROSS AVENUE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Contractor: DISCOVERY BUILDERS CALIFORNIA INC DBA DB 14605 N 73RD STREET SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 (480)624-5200 Llc. No.: 915336 Detail: LIVIN ON THE EIGHTH LLC / 11,685SF DWELLING [VB/RES-3/CLASS A-FR/13D] THIS PERMIT DOES NOT INCLUDE POOL, SPA, BLOCK WALLS, WATER FEATURES, BBQ, OR FIRE FEATURES. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - RESIDENTIAL 270-0000-43201 0 $2,073.36 Total Paid for ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - AIPP: $2,073.36 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT BSAS SB1473 FEE 101-0000-20306 0 $42.00 Total Paid for BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION BSA: $42.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - CIVIC CENTER 252-0000-43200 0 $942.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - COMMUNITY CENTERS 254-0000-43200 0 $129.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - FIRE PROTECTION 257-0000-43200 0 $433.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - LIBRARIES 253-0000-43200 0 $344.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - PARK MAINTENANCE 256-0000-43200 0 $40.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - PARKS/REC 251-0000-43200 0 $2,048.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - STREET MAINTENANCE 255-0000-43200 0 $116.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT DIF - TRANSPORTATION 250-0000-43200 0 $2,842.00 Total Paid for DIF - SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING: $6,894.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT TEMP POWER SERVICE 101-0000-42403 0 $26.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT TEMP POWER SERVICE PC 101-0000-42600 1 0 L $18.68 Total Paid for ELECTRICAL: $45.36 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL, EA ADDITION 1,000SF 101-0000-42403 0 $163.32 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL, EA ADDITION 1,000SF, PC 101-0000-42600 0 $67.20 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL, FIRST 1,000SF 101-0000-42403 0 $160.10 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL, FIRST 1,000SF, PC 101-0000-42600 0 $52.83 Total Paid for ELECTRICAL - NEW CONSTRUCTION: $443.45 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING - CUSTOM HOME LOT >7KSF 101-0000-42408 0 $40.02 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT RESIDENTIAL PRECISE GRADING - CUSTOM HOME LOT >7KSF PC 101-0000-42600 1 0 000.12 Total Paid for GRADING: $240.14 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT CONDENSER/COMPRESSOR 101-0000-42402 0 $320.16 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT CONDENSER/COMPRESSOR PC 101-0000-42600 0 $213.44 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT EXHAUST HOOD 101-0000-42402 0 $26.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT EXHAUST HOOD PC 101-0000-42600 0 $10.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT FURNACE 101-0000-42402 0 $320.16 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT FURNACE PC 101-0000-42600 0 $213.44 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT VENT FAN 101-0000-42402 0 $200.10 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT VENT FAN PC 101-0000-42600 0 $80.10 Total Paid for MECHANICAL: $1,384.76 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 101-0000-42400 0 $1,152.80 Total Paid for NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT: $1,152.80 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK 101-0000-42600 0 $2,514.73 Total Paid for NEW CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK: $2,514.73 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT- RESIDENTIAL 101-0000-42600 1 $1,200.00 Total Paid for PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT - RESIDENTIAL: $1,200.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT BACKFLOW DEVICE 101-0000-42401 0 $13.34 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT BACKFLOW DEVICE PC 101-0000-42600 0 $5.34 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT BUILDING SEWER 101-0000-42401 0 $26.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT BUILDING SEWER PC 101-0000-42600 0 $18.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT FIXTURE/TRAP 101-0000-42401 0 $453.56 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT FIXTURE/TRAP PC 101-0000-42600 0 $453.56 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT GAS SYSTEM, 5+ OUTLETS 101-0000-42401 0 $40.02 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT GAS SYSTEM, 5+ OUTLETS PC 101-0000-42600 1 0 $26.68 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT ROOF DRAIN 101-0000-42401 0 $413.54 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT ROOF DRAIN PC 101-0000-42600 0 $413.54 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT WATER HEATER/VENT 101-0000-42401 0 $13.34 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT WATER HEATER/VENT PC 101-0000-42600 0 $8.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT WATER SYSTEM INST/ALT/REP 101-0000-42401 0 $13.34 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT WATER SYSTEM INST/ALT/REP PC 101-0000-42600 0 $13.34 Total Paid for PLUMBING FEES: $1,912.96 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT RECORDS MANAGEMENT FEE - MAJOR 101-0000-42416 0 $21.00 Total Paid for RECORDS MANAGEMENT FEE - MAJOR: $21.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT SMI - RESIDENTIAL 101-0000-20308 0 $133.82 Total Paid for STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION SMI: $133.82 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT FEE 502-0000-43611 0 $5.00 Total Paid for TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT FEE: $5.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT QTY AMOUNT 101-0000-42600 ($1,200.00) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 2018 UPDATE 224-0000-20320 0 $1,200.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT CITY AMOUNT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 2018 UPDATE 224-0000-20320 0 $1,110.00 Total Paid for TUMF - RESIDENTIAL: $1,110.00 TOTALS: f (-AI iF0 RNI,A - Project Address: 5 3 - (I �s3 APN #: 77 q' 6 Applicant Name: , ) 44" Address: = ) ifa- ItIE , Caren City, ST, Zip: 1Aa' // iG J--2 Telephone: -7 71 -&,Sd'- Email: Property wner's Name: Address: d/,(/ 67G/4i City, ST, Zipr07/ IIWV- Telephone: 8616payC 141ILS (U Email: CS20j°t - oiq 7 Project Description: Y",o Valuation of Project $ New Commercial / Tenant Improvements: L� Total Building _.SF Construction Type: Occupancy: 78495 CALLE TAMPICO LA QUINTA, CA 92253 760-777-7000 Building Permit Number: Q-ES Z vl 9 — 01 Project Description: JSFR Exempt: ❑ (Materials may contain hazardous wastes and are not subject to recycling provisions) Construction Debris Management Plan Plan Submittal Date 6/12/2019 Job Site Address 53-494 Ross Ave (Lots 47A) Owner's Name Number, Street, or PO Box City, State, Postal Code Owner's Phone Number Owner's E-Mail Address Project Manager's Name' Project Manager's Phone Number Project Manager's E-mail Address Gal Asher Tammy Jenkins 760-393-5286 (j<ankins (2 discpyer_Ybuildursllc.com Builder/Contractor Discovery Builders California Inc Number, Street or PO Box- 53965 Humboldt Blvd City, State, Postal Code. La Quinta, CA. 92253 Project Square Footage Approx. 11,685 square feet c City Approval By Renado Gouldlock-DEC/Burrtee+Nash' P Date of City Approval Q� b t 1 2P ) m Materials To Be Discarded: Product Trash Asphalt Brick/Block Cardboard Commingled Concrete Drywall Donated / Reuse* *Describe Items Tons 45.00 Not recyclable 0.00 Recyclable 0.00 Recyclable 0.00 Recyclable 0.00 Recyclable 49.50 Recyclable 5.75 Recyclable 0.00 Recyclable Product Masonry (broken) Plaster Scrap Metal Tile (floor) Tile (roof) Wood Landscape Debris Ui Tons 0.00 Recyclable —13.00 Recyclable _ 0.00 Recyclable 11.20f Recyclable _ 1.551 Recyclable 18.001 Recyclable Totals: Recycle Trash Projected Diversion: 89.0 45.01 I understand it is the property owner's responsibility to submit copies of weight tickets or receipts to the District Environmental Coordinator as these hauls occur. I hereby certify that completion, implementation and adherence of the Debris Management Plan (DMP) for the above named project shall guarantee that at least 65% of the jobsite waste is diverted from landfilling. The remaining material will be recycled or reused. I will divert, for recycling or re -use, remaining materials generated from the first day of the project through the completion of the project in accordance with this plan. This DMP is issued in the name of the property owner(s) and shall remain their property throughout the construction and/or demolition project. A contractor serving as agent of the owner may obtain a DMP for the owner. However, the DMP is still issued in the name of the property owner(s) and the owner retains legal responsibility for ensuring that the provisions of the DMP are adhered to. The pro5erty owner(s) and general contractor shall be kept informed of the diversion progress through bi-monthly reports�FVlf-ha9Fng, all refuse material from this project site must be taken to an approved recycler or transfer C" 0 N !'V 0 to Q t w a 4 en D LU S O 'L W O 0 U z 0 Coachella Valley Unified School District 83-733 Avenue 55, Thermal, CA 92274 (760) 398-5909 - Fax (760) 398-1224 Project Name: Owner's Name: Project Address: Madison Club This Box For District Use Only DEVELOPER FEES PATD AREA: OUNT LEVEL ONE AMOUNT; LEVEL TWO AMOUNT: MITIGATION AMOUNT: COMMAND. AMOUNT: DATE: RECEIPT: CHECK#: _cl1Y-0E- ADllII�T. INITIALS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (California Education Code 17620) Livin on the Eigth, LLC 53-494 Ross Avenue, LaQuinta Project Description: SFD APN: 7677-680-052 Tract #: Type of Development: Residential xx Commercial Total Square Feet of Building Area: 11,685 sq. ft. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ Date: August 2, 2019 Phone No. 760-218-8826 Lot #'s: Industrial Certification of Applicant/Owners: The person signing certifies that the above information is correct and makes this statement under penalty of perjury and further represents that he/she is authorized to sign on behalf of the owner/developed Dated: August 2, 2019 Signature: SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (CIRCLE ONE) Education Code Gov. Code Project Agreement Existing Not Subject to Fee 17620 65995 Approval Prior to 1/1/87 Requirement Note: Number of Sq.Ft. 11685 Pursuant to AB 181 any room additions or enclosures of 500 sq. ft. or less are exempt from developer fees. Any mobile Amount per Sq.Ft. $3.79 homes being relocated within the same school district's Amount Collected $44286.15 jurisdiction are exempt from developer fees. Building Permit Application Completed: Yes/No By: Larry Moen, Director Facilities Dev. & Planning Certificate issued by: Laurie Howard, Administrative Spec. Signature: ef-1 NOTICE OF 90 DAY PERIOD FOR PROTEST OF FEES AND STATEMENT OF FEES Section 66020 of the Government Code asserted by Assembly Bill 3081, effective January 1, 1997, requires that this District provide (1) a written notice to the project appellant, at the time of payment of school fees, mitigation payment or other exactions ("Fees"), of the 90-day period to protest the imposition of these Fees and (2) the amount of the fees. Therefore, in accordance with section 66020 of the Government code and other applicable law, this Notice shall serve to advise you that the 90-day protest period in regard to such Fees or the validity thereof, commences with the payment of the fees or performance of any other requirements as described in section 66020 of the Government code. Additionally, the amount of the fees imposed is as herein set forth, whether payable at this time or in whole or in part prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. As in the latter, the 90 days starts on the date hereof. This Certificate of Compliance is valid for thirty (30) days from the date of issuance. Extension will be granted only for good cause, as determined by the School District, and up to three (3) such extensions may be granted. 11/2010 89F5 )- 0 f q-() (L( ? CITY OF LA QUINTA - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GREEN SHEET PUBLIC WORKS CLEARANCE FOR RELEASE OF BUILDING PERMIT Form updated & effective 9/25/2009 Green Sheet approvals are forwarded to the Building & Safety Department directly by Public Works. Please DO NOT submit the Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) Packet to the Public Works Department until ALL requirements listed below are complete. Incomplete applications or applications which cannot be processed will be returned to applicant. Date: it / 0 d q Developer:-.J14CO tj I q�iaAl (--5 C m Tract No.: 53D -1 Tract Name: 11f lak�OYN d"Lot No.(s): IR Address(s): ,� Phone Number: (70 ) 393- 9z a The following are the requirements for Public Works Clearance to authorize issuance of a building permit from the Building & Safety Department: fO-'CUSTOM HOMES: PROVIDE ITEMS #2, #3, #4, #5 & #7 BELOW ❑ TRACT HOMES: PROVIDE ITEMS #1, #2, #3 & #5 BELOW ❑ COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS/OTHER: PROVIDE ITEMS #1, #2, #3, #5 & #7 BELOW ❑ WALLS, SIGNS, OTHER: PROVIDE ITEM #6 BELOW 1. Attach Pad Elevation Certificates in compliance with the approved design elevation for building pad (maximum allowable deviation of +/- 0.1 foot). Pad Elevation Certificates must be current (within 6 months of current date). If a precise grading plan creates the pad for approval, please withhold green sheet submittal until a Pad Elevation Certificate can be provided. (2) Attach geotechnical certification of grading plan compliance including compaction reports from a licensed Soils Engineer. Recently rough graded residential developments which have a previously approved geotechnical certification are exempt from this requirement. © Attach recorded final map or title information/grant deed showing proposed building locations are legal lots. ® Complete the attached <1 acre per lot or infill project Fugitive Dust Control project information form, PM10 plan & agreement or provide alternative & valid City approved PM10 plan set reference number or hard copy plan. PM10 plans for commercial & residential developments (beyond 1 lot) are submitted separately with grading plans & are subject to additional requirements. A current PM10 certification number is required. Q Attach a copy of the rough or precise grading plan to the Public Works Department showing building location(s) for pad elevation verification. AO flood zone developments will require an approved flood plain development plan. 6, Attach supporting documentation for wall plan, monument sign, grease trap or special facility installations. Complete and sign the attached water quality management plan (WQMP) exemption form, if applicable. PW approved building construction projects require either a WQMP or a completed WQMP exemption form. Approved maps/plans may be viewed at the following link: http://www.la-gtiinta.orq/PlanCiieck/m search.asr)x I have reviewed and confirmed the requirements listed above as presented and find the improvements to be sufficiently complete for construction of the proposed buildings/structures/walls/signs on the subject lot(s). Pursuant to my findings, the above project may be released for building permit issuance. This section completed by City staff. Recommended by: Date: / �/ / v 1 Public Works Distribution: Green Sheet to Building & Safety ( } Green Sheet to Planning Department Declined for approval for reason(s) as follow(s), please correct and resubmit: TAChecklists - Forms & Applications\Forms & Applications\GREEN SHEET cover & PM10 less than 1 Acre Revised 10-02-12.doc City of La Quinta - PM 10 Fugitive Dust Control Project Information Construction Phase PM 10 Agreement (< 1 acre/lot or Inf ill Project) Project Information Project Phase (check one) Construction ❑ Demolition Total Acres in Active Construction (< 1 acre per Lot): _ _, $ 9. Project Contractor: Project Name: - uo4 Project Tract/Lot Numbers: �J 5o(I 4qA Project Street Address: 63.zoq' P-o--cz Ave / 15 R Anticipated Start Date: � /�/� Anticipated Completion Date: PM10 Contact Information Please note: Dust control is required 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, regardless of construction status. Person listed below is responsible for dust control during business and non -business hours. Name: Title: Company Name: Mailing Address: ty, State, ZIP Code: Primary Phone #: Fax #: 24 Hour Emergency Phone#: Cell Phone #: Email Address: C ti (n+e-8c7--ri INC 53Gmtot) tdf -BIV cA QU (n+n CA C1 D�a 53 -NO '7593-_5Z�(o rlfoO • 359- 50aD -RoD. -7 co @ (A(5cDwer-u b u i (tiers ucc . PM 10 Certificate #: I C V U The above statedroperty owner (or authorized representative): Shall act as his/her acknowledgement of dust control requirements and their enforceability, pursuant to SCAQMD Rules 403, 403.1, 401, 402, 201, 203 and PERP; Shall constitute an Agreement to comply with all project conditions as identified in the approved dust control plan. ❖ Acknowledges that dust control is required twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, throughout the period of project performance, regardless of project size or status; Shall ensure that each and every contractor, subcontractor and all other persons associated with the project shall be in continuous compliance with all requirements of the approved dust control plan; Shall take all necessary precautions to minimize dust, even if additional measures beyond those listed in the dust -control plan are necessary; •:• Shall authorize representatives • of City/County to enter the property for inspection and/or abatement purposes; Shall hold harmless the City/County and its representatives from liability for any actions related to this dust control plan o ,y City ounty initiated abatement activities. �11-2-119- rnature erty Owner or Authorized Representative Da Le City of La Quinta - PM 10 Fugitive Dust Control Plan (< 1 acre per Lot or Infill Project) This Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall take into account applicable SCAQMD Regulations Rule 403, 403.1, 401, 402, 201, 203 and Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP). ❖ WATERING: Continuous watering is required to prevent dust and must occur a minimum of four (4) times daily. Water shall be applied from an adequate sized metered water source to dry soils to prevent: ■ Visible dust emissions >20% opacity ■ Visible dust emissions that travel > 100 feet from the source (within site) • Visible dust emissions that cross any property line EDUCATION: The responsible dust control Individual and key personnel shall attend SCAQMD PM10 class and obtain PM10 certificate number prior to construction activity (training information may be obtained by contacting SCAQMD at (909) 396-2183). CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES: A copy of this approved Fugitive Dust Plan must be kept on site. At least one short-term stabilization method must be used during off hours. At least one long-term stabilization measure must be used within ten (10) days of ceasing activity. WEATHER MONITORING: Wind predictions shall be monitored. ❖ SIGNAGE: Approved signs shall be installed at a highly visible location. Please refer to the Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Plan Handbook for Construction Signage Guidelines. ❖ TRAFFIC: Construction traffic shall not be allowed on the pad, unless absolutely necessary. If vehicles operate on pad, pad shall be kept firm and moist through hose watering and sprinklers; and a maximum traffic speed of 15mph will be enforced. Fugitive Dust shall be prevented by fencing off site to prevent unauthorized traffic on pad. ❖ PARKING: Parking is not allowed on pad. All vehicles must park on street at designated areas only. d• TRACK OUT: Provide 24 hour street cleaning and track out system as approved by City Public Works inspectors. No dirt on public or private roads. Track out shall be cleaned up within one (1) hour of incident and at the conclusion of each workday. ❖ DIRT PILES: Dirt piles shall be limited to 50 cubic yards and built per California Building Code grading requirements. Piles shall be kept moist or covered with tarp material. Larger dirt piles will require stockpile or grading permit. FENCING: Provide PM10 fencing at perimeter of public roads and where applicable. Wood slat fencing can be installed at rear of property and return 20 feet on either side if HOA restrictions apply. Block walls can replace PM10 fencing during the construction phase. EQUIPMENT: Extra hoses and sprinklers shall be maintained on site. ❖ EXCAVATION MEASURES: All areas to be excavated or graded shall be pre -watered. Water shall also be applied during excavation or grading operations. ❖ DUMP TRUCKS: Open top dump trucks shall be wet down, moist and covered with a tarp prior to leaving site. INACTIVE SITE: Within 10 days of ceasing of activities, re -vegetate or permanently stabilize as required. ❖ RECORD KEEPING: Fugitive Dust Control Plan records (i.e. self inspection records, records of use of chemical suppressants, etc.) shall be maintained for 3 years by the Property Owner (or Authorized Representative). Property Owner,shall notify the City and SCAQMD within 10 days of completion of project. Water nimlitu MannnPment Plan (WQMP) FxRmntion Form - Whitewater River Redon Documentation of Project Not Requiring a WQMP but Reguiring Site Design BMPs and Source Control Entitlement Conditions of Approval or Permit Conditions - WQMP Required for the Listed Change or for Changes of Pollutant Stream (All Questions Below Must be Answered "No" To Exempt _ Entitlement or construction of new single-family hillside residence(s) that create 10,000 square feet, or more, of impervious area where the pre -development natural slope is 25% or greater? _ Entitlement or construction of new single-family hillside residence(s) that create 10,000 square feet, or more, of impervious area where the pre -development natural slope is 10% or greater where erosive soil conditions are known? Entitlement or construction of new commercial and industrial development(s) of 100,000 square feet or more? BMPs by Uses of Land Project) Yes No X r/ �C Entitlement or construction of new automotive repair shop(s) including body, upholstery, paint, exhaust, tire, transmission, engine.or other automotive specialty repair. [Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 5013, 7532, 7533, 7534, 7537, 7538, and 75391? Entitlement or construction of new retail gasoline outlet(s) disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet? Entitlement or construction of new restaurant(s) (or potential restaurant shell space) disturbing greater than 5,000 square feet? Entitlement or construction of new home subdivision(s) with 10 or more housing units? Entitlement or construction of new parking lot(s) of 5,000 square feet or more, or with 25 or more parking spaces, and potentially exposed to Urban Runoff? X �( Applicant Information Y Name and Title ,) Company l/ Phone 6 94 Email I se r ' Project Information Project Name / T y p (SFH ulti•Famiiy, Commercial, Etc.) �T Location or Street Address .5 it t� Rn 55 4 V eAlU Nearest Cross Streets Municipality/County/Zip Code La Quinta Tract Number(s) and/or Assessor Parcel Number(s) ,1.9 p q(o - Q / '76,9 - (p d O • QtSZ Other Location Information Watershed Whitewater River Source Control BMP Information Size of Project Area (nearest 0.1 acre) C Ie Project Area managed with Site Design or Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs (nearest 0.1 acre) Is the project subject to onsite retention by City ordinance or policy? Nz) Name of the Entity that will implement, operate, and _ aintain the Source Control BMPs m Contact Name _ Street or Mailing Address bl5roo ,Ub l.e- 11 o*w (Iroa 1 Jr� �(y Jr f✓ city Clf Zip Code 2� j Phone Check Item To be Performed Source Control BMP Requirements - All Projects Require Non -Structural BMP Source Control Non -Structural BMP (See Appendix H, Section 4.5.2.1) Ongoing Irrigation System and Landscape Maintenance Ongoing Litter Control X Ongoing Drainage System Inspection & Maintenance Education/Training for Property Owner, Operators, Occupants, or Employees Activity Restrictions — Prohibition of Debris Blowing/Sweeping/Washing into Street/Storm Drain, Closed Trash Lids, Restriction of Vehicle Washing Ongoing Street Sweeping at Private Streets and Private Parking Lots Source Control BMP Requirements — Small Sloped Lots, Small Commercial, < 10 Unit Subdivisions, < 5,000 Square Ft. Parking Lots, Etc. Structural BMP (See Appendix H, Section 4.5.2.2) Storm Drain Inlet Stenciling and Signage Check Item To be Provided N Landscape and Irrigation System Design to Minimize Erosion & Nuisance Runoff Protection of Slopes and Channels to Minimize Erosion Multi=Family Project Use of Community Car Wash Racks Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas to Use Sanitary Sewer Fueling Area (Design & Maintenance) Including PCC Surface, Canopy & Spill Prevention Air/Water Supply Area Drainage (Design & Maintenance) Including Spill Area Containment Trash Storage Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Attached Lids, Storm Water Controls Loading Docks (Design & Maintenance) Including Storm Water Controls, Dry & Frequent Cleaning Procedures Maintenance Bays (Design & Maintenance) Including Indoor Location & Storm Water Containment Vehicle and Equipment Wash Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment Outdoor Material Storage Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment Outdoor Work Areas or Processing Areas (Design & Maintenance) Including Canopy & Containment I CC&R's, Maintenance Agreements or Other mechanisms will be used to ensure the ongoing operation, maintenance, funding, transfer and implementation of the project -specific WQMP requirements. Legal description and plat stamped by Registered Surveyor to be attached to the applicable CC&R or Maintenance Agreement for recordation at Riverside County. (Optional Requirement -to be reviewed on a Project by Project basis) BMP Ackno The applicant shall comply with listed BMPs and applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2008'0001 and the State Water ' Resources Control Board's Order No. 99-08-DWQ. Signature: Print Name: Title: Date: Phone:( Applicant. Certification I certify that I have read this form in its entirety and understand the City's submittal and review process and the requirements for this form. I understand and agree that if during the processing of the form, it is determined the information contains errors or omissions, clarification and/or supplemental information may be required and the preparation of such information may be considered, in the Community Development Director's judgment, an unreasonable delay and will result in a suspension of processing time limits in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15109. Signature: &UlPrint Name Title: Date: ! I 1 I Phone: (% I0) Q�475- `► / 01I Owner Certification I certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that I am the property owner of the property that is the subject matter of this application and I am authorizing and hereby do consent to the filling of this application and acknowledge that the final approval by the City of La Quinta, if any, may result in restriction, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property. Signature: , Print Name: G& #Gti e r ^ Title: OA)A AR Date: �1 / Phone: ( RECDesign and Development Department - Building Division 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 MAY 2 3 2019 PH: (760) 777-7125 Fax: (760) 777-7011 Website: www.la-quinta.org CITY OF LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEFERRED TRUSS SUBMITTAL FORM Date: 3 Application Number: eS 2plf Project Street Address: 3 q _ �5-T 1AV,5-1(%l19 Applicant:[ Architect or❑ Contractor of Project (Please check appropriate box) Policy Conditions: 1. Limited to Custom residential pre -fabricated wood trussed roof projects on a case by case basis; 2. This form will be completed and submitted to the Building Division for approval prior to the Second submittal, ** The approved form will be submitted as part of the second submittal package; 3. Deferred Truss Submittal will consist of two sets wet stamped Truss Calculations, Roof Layout and Engineer of Record's Acceptance stamp or letter; 4. Review timefrome is 10 working days; 5. Service Fee of plan review and processing based on actual hourly cost of plans examiner, structural consultant, permit technician (payment required at the time of pickup of approved truss calculations; 6. The deferred truss submittal review and approval will be required prior to a foundation / footing inspection (no exceptions). 7. The approved "JOB" Copy of Truss Calculations is required to be onsite at the time of inspection. Print name:aL1 Signature: �- By singing i f , the appli ant acknowledges and agrees to all conditions and requ' eme , s. Approved By: TA9F— 1:�7V60N Title S' AMINi i2 Date: 7 9 20M **Note to Permit Technician Do Not Accept submittal without Approval of Form. 78-495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta I California 92253 1 760.777.7000 1 www.La-Quinta.org PRINT Z Domestic Water System Flow Analysis Coachella Valley Water District 75515 Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92211 Domestic Water System Flow Analysis (Hydraulic Model) Requested By: JD MECHANICAL, INC. Date: 4/19/19 82579 FLEMING WY., STE. D APN: 767680012 INDIO, CA 92201 Req. Fire Flow: gpm at 20psi for hours. KATHY SLOAN Project Name: 53432 ROSS AVE, LOT 48, MADISON 760-775-6220 CLUB kathy@jdmechanical.co Cell: same FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS -HYDRANT CLOSEST TO 53432 ROSS AVE, LOT 48, MADISON CLUB, GEO 6- 7-10-3, PZ 19-9894 Address: Contact Name: Phone: Email: Domestic Water System Flow Analysis location: — Flow Analysis Description Model Information CVW Test 1 ' Domestic Test 2 Test 3 Model Re Test 4 Flow Requested Domestic Elevation (Ft): 0 76.7 58.85 — None system flow available without Steady State, Dynamic (psi): Residual Pressure (psi): Fire Flow Tested (gpm): 5,000 N/A exceeding CVWD's Combined Total: N/A criteria. Tested Model Junction: J2288 Duration: 2 hours Peak Day Demand (PDD) 11K C E 1) E! Demand Conditions: Reservoir No./Level (s): Pumps Operating No's: Reservoir 6726/27.39' Pumps On Pressure Zone and HGL: Lake Cahuilla (145') M f :l t1M Model: I Tamara FF-CVWD_DomesticWater 012616 Comments: The domestic water system is capable of providing 5,000 gpm for 2 hours that satisfies CVWD s minimum pressure, velocity, and/or head loss criteria. This flow can be achieved by using multiple fire hydrants This simulated system flow analysis may not include all facilities that may be required for this development/project. Please check with Development Services for further information on all required facilities. These results are based on hydraulic modelling and not a guarantee that CVWD's domestic water system will have the capacity to supply water to the project at the flows or pressures indicated. It is important to note that the capacity of the on -site fire system, meters, service lines, backflow assemblies and other appurtenances were not considered in this analysis, which may alter actual flows or pressures. Due to continuous changes in the system, CVWD only considers this system flow analysis valid for six months from date of modelling/analysis. These system flow analysis comments are for plan check purposes only. The ultimate design responsibility resides with the Engineer -of -Record for this Project. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (760) 398-2661, ext. 2397. Completed Bw::!2� Date: ,.re Page 1 of 1 ENG DS-016 (8/31/15) ----------------------_--------------_-•------------------------------------------ I F 6-7-to-z I N i Aa ■ +S� it TRACT 'Yy�+ { 3307d-A r Y ■ .. Fire Flow Analysis hydrant OEO 6-7-10-3 WF: 819305 (PZ 19-9894) 2TRACT 9894-3 w r Tech: Ruben TRACT � � 1C 33076-1 � 4 TRACT f 3300776- 2 v W m / T 54 AVENUE EWST .CCWII NUIWR. DELETCD IA1MlER3• TRACT 29894. 33076-1. 2 O+� �I F A count No. 0607103 ll!lEii 6_7_ 10 - 3 1:l=3:3t 6-7-15-2 SCALE BAR IN FEET: � 100 200 100 600 E00 ! 1 ! I I I 1 i 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 CF1 R-PRF-01 Page 1 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x GENERAL INFORMATION 01 Project Name 53-494 Ross Ave 02 Calculation Description Title 24 Analysis 03 Project Location 53-494 Ross Ave. 04 City La Quinta 05 Standards Version Compliance 2017 06 Zip Code 92253 07 Compliance Manager Version BEMCmpMgr 2016.3.1 (1149) 08 Climate Zone CZ15 09 Software Version EnergyPro 7.2 10 Building Type Single FamilyJEW F_-C� �?b 14 � L/ Front Orientation (deg/Cardinal) 7 270 12 Project Scope Newly Constru �3-_ Number of Dwelling Units 1 14 Total Cond. Floor Area (ft2) 11296 CITY OF Number of Zones 4 16 Slab Area (ft2) 11296 EstAtulON-Number of Stories 1 18 Addition Cond. Floor Area(ft2) n/a nP► 9 Natural Gas Available Yes 20 Addition Slab Area (ft2) n/a1 MAR I ME Glazing Percentage (%) 20 5% COMPLIANCE RESULTS 01 Building Complies with Computer Performanc 02 This building incorporates features that require field testing and/or verification by a certified HERS rater under the supervision of a CEC-approved HERS provider. 03 This building incorporates one or more Special Features shown below ENERGY USE SUMMARY 04 05 06 07 08 Energy Use (kTDV/ft2-yr) Standard Design Proposed Design Compliance Margin Percent Improvement Space Heating 1.55 2.66 -1.11 -71.6% Space Cooling 7340 63.33 10.07 13 7% IAQ Ventilation 0.86 0.86 0.00 0.0% Water Heating 1.45 1 26 0.19 13.1% Photovoltaic Offset ---- 0.00 0.00 -- Compliance Energy Total 77.26 68.11 11.8% i'CC�CI V CU JUN 2 d 2019 CITY OF LA QUINTA 4V DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Registration Number: 219-Po10109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CF1 R-PRF-01 Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribdl6x Page 2 of 10 ENERGY DESIGN RATING Energy Design Rating (EDR) is an alternate way to express the energy performance of a building using a scoring system where 100 represents the energy performance of the Residential Energy Services (RESNET) reference home characterization of the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with California modeling assumptions. A score of zero represents the energy performance of a building that combines high levels of energy efficiency with renewable generation to"zero out' its TDV energy. Because EDR includes consideration of components not regulated by Title 24, Part 6 (such as domestic appliances and consumer electronics), it is not used to show compliance with Part 6 but may instead be used by local jurisdictions pursuing local ordinances under Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen). As a Standard Design building under the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards is significantly more efficient than the baseline EDR building, the EDR of the Standard Design building is provided for Information. Similarly, the EDR score of the Proposed Design is provided separately from the EDR value of installed PV so that the effects of efficiency and renewable energy can both be seen EDR of Standard Efficiency EDR of Proposed Efficiency EDR Value of Proposed PV + Battery Final Proposed EDR 48.4 43.6 0.0 43.6 ❑ Design meets Tier 1 requirement of 15% or greater code compliance margin (CALGreen A4.203.1.2.1) and QII verification prerequisite. ❑ Design meets Tier 2 requirement of 30% or greater code compliance margin (CALGreen A4.203.1.2.2) and QII verification prerequisite. ❑ Design meets Zero Net Energy (ZNE) Design Designation requirement for Single Family in climate zone CZ15 (CALGreen A4.203.1.2.3) including on -site photovoltaic (PV) renewable energy generation sufficient to achieve a Final Energy Design Rating (EDR) of zero or less. The PV System and QII must be verified. Notes: • Excess PV Generation EDR Credit: Bypassing PV size limit may violate Net Energy Metering (NEM) rules REQUIRED SPECIAL FEATURES The following are features that must be installed as condition for meeting the modeled energy performance for this computer analysis. • Central parallel piping HERS FEATURE SUMMARY The following is a summary of the features that must be field -verified by a certified HERS Rater as a condition for meeting the modeled energy performance for this computer analysis. Additional detail is provided in the building components tables below. Building -level Verifications: • High quality insulation installation (QII) • IAQ mechanical ventilation Cooling System Verifications: • Minimum Airflow • Verified EER • Verified SEER • Verified Refrigerant Charge • Fan Efficacy Watts/CFM HVAC Distribution System Verifications: • Duct Sealing Domestic Hot Water System Verifications: • --None -- Registration Number: 219-Po10109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date(Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x CF1 R-PRF-01 Page 3 of 10 BUILDING - FEATURES INFORMATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Project Name Conditioned Floor Area (ftZ) Number of Dwelling Units Number of Bedrooms Number of Zones Number of Ventilation Cooling Systems Number of Water Heating Systems 53-494 Ross Ave. 11296 1 12 4 0 1 ZONE INFORMATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Zone Name Zone Type HVAC System Name Zone Floor Area (ftZ) Avg. Ceiling Height Water Heating System 1 Water Heating System 2 master Conditioned HVACmstr1 2653 9 DHW Sys 1 n/a living kitchen hall Conditioned HVACliv2 4661 9 DHW Sys 1 n/a kids Conditioned HVACkid3 2817 9 DHW Sys 1 n/a casita Conditioned HVACcasta4 1165 9 DHW Sys 1 n/a CaICERTS, Inc i I- 1-� F) F� G. V I F- 1.1'� Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x CF1 R-PRF-01 Page 4 of 10 OPAQUE SURFACES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Name Zone Construction Azimuth Orientation Gross Area (ftZ) Window & Door Area (ftZ) Tilt (deg) N Wall master R-21 Wall 0 Left 1026 231.5 90 E Wall master R-21 Wall 90 Back 736 216 90 S Wall master R-21 Wall 180 Right 96 0 90 W Wall master R-21 Wall 270 Front 72 0 90 Interior Surface master R-0 Interior Wall n/a n/a 566 0 n/a RoofR38R13mstr master R-38 Roof Attic n/a n/a 2653 n/a n/a N Wall 2 living kitchen hall R-21 Wall 0 Left 416 216 90 E Wall 2 living kitchen hall R-21 Wall 90 Back 1260 708 90 S Wall 2 living kitchen hall R-21 Wall 180 Right 982 204 90 W Wall 2 living kitchen hall R-21 Wall 270 Front 835 216 90 Interior Surface 2 living kitchen hall R-0 Interior Wall n/a n/a 412 0 n/a RoofR38R131iv living kitchen hall R-38 Roof Attic n/a n/a 4661 n/a n/a N Wall 3 kids R-21 Wall 0 Left 388 0 90 E Wall 3 kids R-21 Wall 90 Back 96 0 90 S Wall 3 kids R-21 Wall 180 Right 612 300 90 W Wall 3 kids R-21 Wall 270 Front 321 48 90 Interior Surface 3 kids R-0 Interior Wall n/a n/a 288 0 n/a Roofr38R13kids kids R-38 Roof Attic n/a n/a 2817 n/a n/a N Wall 4 casita R-21 Wall 0 Left 388 220 90 E Wall 4 casita R-21 Wall 90 Back 72 0 90 S Wall 4 casita R-21 Wall 180 Right 326 0 90 W Wall 4 casita R-21 Wall 270 Front 388 0 90 Interior Surface 4 casita R-0 Interior Wall n/a n/a 288 0 n/a Roofr38R 1 3casta casita R-38 Roof Attic n/a n/a 1165 n/a n/a Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CFI R-PRF-01 Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x Page 5 of 10 ATTIC 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Name Construction Type Roof Rise Roof Reflectance Roof Emittance Radiant Barrier Cool Roof Attic master Attic Roofmaster Unventilated 0 0.1 085 No No Attic living kitchen hall Attic Roofliving kitchen hall Unventilated 0 0.1 0.85 No No Attic kids Attic Roofkids Unventilated 0 0.1 0.85 No No Attic casita Attic Roofcasita Unventilated 0 0.1 0.85 No No FENESTRATION / GLAZING 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Name Type Surface (Orientation -Azimuth) Width (ft) Height (ft) Multiplier Area (ft) U-factor SHGC Exterior Shading a Window N Wall (Left-0) - 1 56.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 5 Window N Wall (Left-0) 1 77.0 0.42 0-21 Insect Screen (default) b Window N Wall (Left-0) ---- 1 20.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) c Window N Wall (Left-0) ---- - 1 10.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 6 Window N Wall (Left-0) -- 1 68.5 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 7 Window E Wall (Back-90) --- -- 1 216-0 0.42 0-21 Insect Screen (default) 19 Window N Wall 2 (Left-0) ---- 1 216.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 8 Window E Wall 2 (Back-90) -- 1 420.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 9 Window E Wall 2 (Back-90) ---- ---- 1 288-0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 2 Window S Wall 2 (Right-180) ---- - 1 204.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 1 Window W Wall 2 (Front-270) -- 1 216.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 10 Window S Wall 3 (Right-180) ---- -- 1 100-0 0-42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 11 Window S Wall 3 (Right-180) -- - 1 100-0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 12 Window S Wall 3 (Right-180) ---- 1 100.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 3 Window N Wall 4 (Left-0) --- 1 40.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) 4 Window N Wall 4 (Left-0) ---- -- 1 180.0 0.42 0.21 Insect Screen (default) Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Datelfime: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CF1R-PRF-01 Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Page 6 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x OPAQUE DOORS 01 02 03 04 Name Side of Building Area (ft2) U-factor Door W Wall 3 24.0 0.50 Door 2 W Wall 3 240 0.50 OPAQUE SURFACE CONSTRUCTIONS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Construction Name Surface Type Construction Type Framing Total Cavity R-value Winter Design U-factor Assembly Layers • Around Roof Joists: R-0.0 insul. • Cavity/Frame: R-13.0/2x4 Top Chrd Attic Roofmaster Attic Roofs Wood Framed Ceiling 2x4 Top Chord of Roof Truss @ 24 in. O C. R 13 Roof Deck: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking 0.078 Roofing: Light Roof (Asphalt Shingle) Inside Finish: Gypsum Board Ceilings (below Cavity/Frame: R-9.1 /2x4 R-38 Roof Attic attic) Wood Framed Ceiling 2x4 @ 16 in. O-C. R 38 0.025 Over Ceiling Joists: R-28.9 insul. +� , Inside Finish: Gypsum Board R-21 Wall Exterior Walls Wood Framed Wall 2x6 @ 16 in. O.0 R 21 0.069 • Ca vity / Frame: R-21 / 2x6 Exterior Finish: 3 Coat Stucco Inside Finish: Gypsum Board R-0 Interior Wall Interior Walls Wood Framed Wall 2x4 @ 16 in. O.C. none. 0.277 Cavity/Frame: no insul. /2x4 Other Side Finish: Gypsum Board • Around Roof Joists: R-0 0 insul. • Cavity/Frame: R- 13 0/2x4 Top Chrd Attic Roofliving kitchen hall Attic Roofs Wood Framed Ceiling 2x4 Top Chord of Roof Truss @ 24 in. O C. R 13 0.078 Roof Deck: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking Roofing: Light Roof (Asphalt Shingle) Around Roof Joists: R-0.0 insul. Ca vity / Frame: R-13.0 / 2x4 Top Chrd 2x4 Top Chord of Roof Truss @ 24 Roof Deck: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking Attic Roofkids Attic Roofs Wood Framed Ceiling in. O C. R 13 0.078 Roofing: Light Roof (Asphalt Shingle) • Around Roof Joists: R-0.0 insul. • Cavity/Frame: R-13.0/2x4 Top Chrd 2x4 Top Chord of Roof Truss @ 24 Roof Deck: Wood Siding/sheathing/decking Attic Roofcasita Attic Roofs Wood Framed Ceiling in. O.0 R 13 0 078 Roofing: Light Roof (Asphalt Shingle) Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-000o Registration DatefTime: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD CF1R-PRF-01 Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 Page 7 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x SLAB FLOORS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Name Zone Area (ft2) Perimeter (ft) Edge Insul. R-value & Depth Carpeted Fraction Heated Slab -on -Grade master 2653 188 None 0.8 No Slab -on -Grade 2 living kitchen hall 4661 312 None 0.8 No Slab -on -Grade 3 kids 2817 181 None 0.8 No Slab -on -Grade 4 casita 1165 186 None 0.8 No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS 01 Name DHW Sys 1 02 03 System Type Distribution Type DHW Central Parallel Piping 04 Water Heater DHW Heater 1 (2) 05 Number of Heaters 2 06 Solar Fraction (%) .0% WATER HEATERS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Input Rating / Tank Standby Heater Tank Uniform Energy Pilot / Insulation Loss / First Hour NEEA Heat Pump Tank Location Element Number Volume Factor / Energy Thermal R-value Recovery Rating / Brand / Model / or Ambient Name Type Tank Type of Units (gal) Factor / Efficiency Efficiency (Int/Ext) Eff Flow Rate Other Condition DHW Heater 1 Gas Small 2 Instantaneous 0 0 96 EF <= 200 kBtu/hr R-0/R-0 0 n/a n/a n/a SPACE CONDITIONING SYSTEMS 01 02 03 04 05 06 SC Sys Name System Type Heating Unit Name Cooling Unit Name Fan Name Distribution Name HVACmstr1 Heat Pump Heating and Cooling System Heat Pump System 1 Heat Pump System 1 HVAC Fan 1 Air Distribution System 1 HVACliv2 Heat Pump Heating and Cooling System Heat Pump System 2 Heat Pump System 2 HVAC Fan 2 Air Distribution System 2 HVACkid3 Heat Pump Heating and Cooling System Heat Pump System 3 Heat Pump System 3 1 HVAC Fan 3 Air Distribution System 3 HVACcasta4 Heat Pump Heating and Cooling System Heat Pump System 4 Heat Pump System 4 HVAC Fan 4 Air Distribution S stem 4 Y Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 CFI R-PRF-01 Page 8 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x HVAC - HEAT PUMPS 01 Name 02 System Type 03 Number of Units 04 F 65 06 Heating 07 08 09 Cooling Zonally SEER EER Controlled 10 Compressor Type 11 HERS Verification HSPF/COP Cap 47 Cap 17 Heat Pump System 1 SplitHeatPump 1 8 55600 33360 16 12.5 Not Zonal Single Speed Heat Pump System 1-hers-cool Heat Pump System 2 SplitHeatPump 3 8 55600 33360 16 125 Not Zonal Single Speed Heat Pump System 2-hers-cool Heat Pump System 3 SplitHeatPump 3 8 35600 21360 16 12.5 Not Zonal Single Speed Heat Pump System 3-hers-cool Heat Pump System 4 SplitHeatPump 1 8 35600 21360 16 12.5 Not Zonal Single Speed Heat Pump System 4-hers-cool HVAC COOLING - HERS VERIFICATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 Name Verified Airflow Airflow Target Verified EER Verified SEER Verified Refrigerant Charge Heat Pump System 1-hers-cool Required 350 Required Required Required Heat Pump System 2-hers-cool Required 350 Required Required Required Heat Pump System 3-hers-cool Required 350 Required Required Required Heat Pump System 4-hers-cool Required 350 Required Required Required HVAC - DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Name Type Duct Leakage Insulation R-value Duct Location Bypass Duct HERS Verification Air Distribution System 1 DuctsAttic Sealed and tested 8 Attic None Air Distribution System 1-hers-dist Air Distribution System 2 DuctsAttic Sealed and tested 8 Attic None Air Distribution System 2-hers-dist Air Distribution System 3 DuctsAttic Sealed and tested 8 Attic None Air Distribution System 3-hers-dist Air Distribution System 4 L 1 DuctsAttic 4 Sealed and tested 8 Attic None Air Distribution System 4-hers-dist Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration DatelTime: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 CF1 R-PRF-01 Page 9 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-19.ribd16x HVAC DISTRIBUTION - HERS VERIFICATION 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Duct Leakage Duct Leakage Verified Duct Verified Duct Buried Deeply Buried Low -leakage Name Verification Target (%) Location Design Ducts Ducts Air Handler Air Distribution System 1-hers-dist Required 5.0 Not Required Not Required Not Required Not Required n/a Air Distribution System 2-hers-dist Required 5.0 Not Required Not Required Not Required Not Required n/a Air Distribution System 3-hers-dist Required 5.0 Not Required Not Required Not Required Not Required n/a Air Distribution System 4-hers-dist Required 5.0 Not Required Not Required Not Required Not Required n/a IAQ (Indoor Air Quality) FANS 01 02 03 04 05 06 Dwelling Unit IAQ CFM IAQ Watts/CFM IAQ Fan Type IAQ Recovery Effectiveness(%) HERS Verification SFam IAQVentRpt 210 0.25 Default 0 Required Registration Number: 219-P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration Date/Time: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE METHOD Project Name: 53-494 Ross Ave. Calculation Date/Time: 11:54, Wed, Jun 19, 2019 CFI R-PRF-01 Page 10 of 10 Calculation Description: Title 24 Analysis Input File Name: Madison Lot 47-Hugo-1 9. ribd 1 6x DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT 1 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: Documentation Author Signature: �G+Yr,-!Z r Tim Scott Company: Signature Date: Scott Design and Title 24, Inc. 2019-06-19 12:09:41 Address: CEA/HERS Certification Identification (If applicable): 77085 Michigan Drive City/State/Zip: Phone: Palm Desert, CA 92211 760-200-4780 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT I certify the following under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California: 1. I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building design identified on this Certificate of Compliance 2. 1 certify that the energy features and performance specifications identified on this Certificate of Compliance conform to the requirements of Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The building design features or system design features identified on this Certificate of Compliance are consistent with the information provided on other applicable compliance documents, worksheets, calculations, plans and specifications submitted to the enforcement agency for approval with this building permit application Responsible Designer Name: Responsible Designer Signature 0 Tim Scott Company: r 1 Date Signed: Scott Design and Title 24, Inc. 2019-06-19 12:09:41 Address: License: 77085 Michigan Drive na City/State/Zip: Phone: Palm Desert, CA 92211 760-200-4780 Digitally signed by Ca10ERTS. This digital signature is provided in order to secure the content of this registered document, and in noway implies Registration Provider responsibility for the accuracy of the information. HERS Provider: CaICERTS inc Report Generated at: 2019-06-19 11:55:15 Registration Number: 219_P010109097B-000-000-0000000-0000 Registration DatefTime: 2019-06-19 12:09:41 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2016 Residential Compliance Report Version - CF1 R-01162019-1149 Sladden June 18, 2019 Engineering 45090 Golf Center Parkway, Suite r, Indio, CA 92201 (760) 863-0713 6782 Stnnion Avenue, Suite C, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 845-7743 900 E. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA. 92543 (95I) 766-8777 www.Slad denengineering. com Discovery Builders CA, Inc. 53-965 Humboldt Boulevarc La Quinta, California 92253 Subject: Geotechnical FA2C_52�-olq..� CITY OF LA QUINTA BUILDING DIVISION REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE �2L-Jgy Project- Proposed Custom Residence b � 53-494 Ross Avenue The Madison Club — Lot 47A La Quinta, California Project No. 544-19205 19-06-297 RECEIVED JUL 0 1 2019 CITY OF LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ref_ Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Sladden Engineering dated January 28, 2005; Project No. 544-4810, Report No. 05-01-101 Report of Testing and Observation During Rough Grading prepared by Sladden Engineering dated March 2, 2006; Project No. 522-4810; Report No. 06-02-120 In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the above referenced geotechnical reports as they relate to the design and construction of the proposed custom residence to be constructed at 53-494 Ross Avenue (Lot 47A) within the Madison Club development in the City of La Quinta, California. It is our understanding that the proposed residential structure will be of relatively lightweight wood -frame construction and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs on grade. The subject lot was previously graded during the rough grading of the Madison Club project site. The rough grading included over -excavation and recompaction of the native surface soil along with the placement of engineered fill material to construct the building pads. The site grading is summarized in the referenced report of Testing and Observation During Rough Grading along with the compaction test results. Because the lot has been previously rough graded, the remedial grading required at this time should be minimal provided that the building area that falls within the previously assumed building envelope. The building areas should be cleared of surface vegetation, scarified and moisture conditioned prior to precise grading. The exposed surface should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction prior to fill placement. The previously removed soil and any fill material should be placed in thin lifts 'at near optimum moisture content and compacted to at Ieast 90 percent relative. compaction., Sladden Engineering Ok June 18, 2019 -2- Project No. 544-19205 19-06-297 The referenced reports include recommendations pertaining to the design and construction of residential structure foundations. The previous reports also address the potential for liquefaction, subsidence and differential settlement. Based upon our review of the referenced reports, it is our opinion that the structural values included in these reports remain applicable for the design and construction of the proposed residential structure foundations. The allowable bearing pressures recommended in the referenced Geotechnical Investigation report remain applicable. Conventional shallow spread footings should be bottomed into properly compacted fill material a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide and isolated pad footings should be at least 2 feet wide. Continuous footings and isolated pad footings should be designed utilizing allowable bearing pressures of 1500 psf and 2000 psf, respectively. Allowable increases of 300 psf for each additional 1 foot of width and 300 psf for each additional 6 inches of depth may be utilized, if desired. The maximum allowable bearing pressure should be 3000 psf. The recommended allowable bearing pressures may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loading. Lateral forces may be resisted by friction along the base of the foundations and passive resistance along the sides of the footings. A friction coefficient of 0.48 times the normal dead load forces is recommended for use in design. Passive resistance may be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pcf. If used in combination with the passive resistance, the frictional resistance should be reduced by one third to 0.33 times the normal dead load forces. The bearing soil is generally non -expansive and falls within the "very low" expansion category in accordance with the 2016 (CBC) classification criteria. Sladden has reviewed the 2016 California Building Code (CBC) and summarized the current seismic design parameters for the proposed structure. The seismic design category for a structure may be determined in accordance with Section 1613 of the 2016 CBC or ASCE7. According to the 2016 CBC, Site Class D may be used to estimate design seismic loading for the proposed structures. The 2016 CBC Seismic Design Parameters are summarized below. Risk Category (Table 15-1): II Site Class (Table 1613.32): D Ss (Figure 1613.3.1):1.500g S1 (Figure 1613.3.1): 0.690g Fa (Table 1613.3.3(1)):1.0 Fv (Table 1613.5.3(2)):1.5 Sms (Equation 16-37 {Fa X Ss)):1.500g Sml (Equation 16-38 {Fv X Si)): 1.035g SD5 (Equation 16-39 (2/3 X Sms)):1.000g SW (Equation 16-40 (2/3 X Smi)): 0.690g Seismic Design Category: D Mantle, FDwinPerinn June 18, 2019 -3- Project No. 544-19205 19-06-297 We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the referenced reports, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SLADDEN ENGINEERING L. Brett L. Anderson MTV, Pia. 5: Principal Engineer GML + EhfGINEr SER/dfe �, •9 OF GAL Copies: 4/Discovery Builders CA, Inc. 'Vaddv» FNIC41/00rhia 54-/Z/— I9265 Please verify that soils reports contain all of the above information. In addition, to as continuity between the lnvestiga€ionlreporting stage and the execution stage, please use the following checllist to verify that the conclusions and recommendations in the report cover all the required elements. Only then can we be assured that the construci#on documents address all of the site soil conditions. La Quanta Geotechnkcak Report Checklist Does the "Conclusions and Recommendations" section Of the report address each of the following criteria? "Address" means: : (a) the criterion is considered significant and mitigation measure(s) no .or, - (b) the criterion is considered Insighificant and explicitly so stated. Y .No Criterion ❑ Foundation criteria based upon bearing capacity of natural or compacted soil. ❑ Foundation criteria to mitigate the effects of expansive soils. • ❑ Foundation criteria based upon bearing capacity, of natural or compacted soil - El Foundation criteria to mitigate -the effects of liquefaction. ❑ Foundation criteria to mitigate the effects of selsmically. Induced differential settlement:. © Foundation criteria to mitigate the effects of long-term differential sett;ement. ❑ Foundation criteria to mitigate the effects of varying soil strength. K ❑ Foundation criteria to mitigate expected total and differential settlement Any "No" answers to the above checklist should be noted as specific required ColTections. S� adder Engineering 45090 Golf Center Parkway, Suite P', Indio, CA 92201 (760) 863-0713 6782 Stanton Avenue, Suite C. Buena Park., CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 450 Egan Avenue, Beaumont, CA 92223 (951) 945-7743 800 E. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA 92543 (951) 766-8777 www.Slad denengineering.com June 18, 2019 Project No. 544-19205 19-06-299 Discovery Builders CA, Inc. 56-965 Humboldt Boulevard La Quinta, California 92253 Project: Proposed Custom Residence 53494 Ross Avenue The Madison Club La Quinta, California ' Subject: Foundation Plan Review Ref: GeotechnicaI Update prepared by Sladden Engineering dated June 18, 2019; Project No. 544-19205, Report No.19-06-297 In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the Foundation Plans and Details prepared by ESI/FME, Inc. for the proposed custom residence to be constructed on Lot 47A located at 53494 Ross Avenue within the Madison Club development in the City of La Quinta, California. Based on our review, it is our opinion that the recommendations provided in the above referenced Geotechnical Update as well as the previous geotechnical reports have been properly incorporated into these plans. If you have questions regarding this memo or the referenced report, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SLADDEN ENGINEERING Brett L. Anderson B— �— Principal Engineer ANDERSON U] No. C45389 Letter/dfe VU ENr_INEER1NG) OF Copies: 4 / Addressee Sladden Engineering ►p►plp.Sladdenerin iiaeering.conr (W) Sladden Engineering 6782 Stanton Ave., Suite A, Buena Park, CA 90621 (714) 523-0952 Fax (714) 523-1369 39-725 Garand Ln., Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92211 (760) 772-3893 Fax (760) 772-3895 January 28, 2005 RECEIVED Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 JUL 4 2 201 East of Madison, LLC I NTEH WEST 81-100 Avenue 53 CONSULTING GROUP La Quinta, California 92253 Attention: Mr. John Gamlin RECEIVED Project: Madison Club Tentative Tract Map 33076 JUN 2 6 2019 NEC Avenue 54 and Madison Street La Quinta, California CITY OF LA WINTA Subject: Geotechnical Investigation DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Presented herewith is the report of our Geotechnical Investigation conducted for the construction of the proposed golf club and residential development to be located on the northeast corner of Avenue 54 and Madison Street in the City of La Quinta, California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in foundation design for the proposed residential structures and the related site improvements. This report presents the results of our field investigation and laboratory testing along with conclusions and recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. This report completes our original scope of services as outlined within our proposal dated December 13, 2004. We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned Respectfully submitted, SLADD-E ENGINEERING Brett L. Anderson _ Principal Engineer SER/pc Copies: 6/East of Madison, LLC C. ti7 S)P. &Ing /3"S rr DES 2�l9 - o/q 7 C, TY F QUIIVTA BUILDING DIVISION REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MADISON CLUB NEC AVENUE 54 & MADISON STREET LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA January 28, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................ . ...................... . . SCOPEOF WORK.........................................................................................................................,............ 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................... 1 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY..................:.......................................................................................... 1 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS............................................................................................................. 2 LIQUEFACTION....................................................................................................................................... 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... ... 3 Foundation Design ..................................... 4 Settlements .................. Lateral Design........................................................... »................................„................................... 5 Retaining Walls.......................................................................................................... 5 ExpansiveSoil................................................................................................................................. 5 Concrete Slabs -on -Grade ................. ..................................................... 5 Soluble Sulfates........................,.....,.....,......................................................................... 5 Tentative Pavement Design............................................................................................................ 6 Shrinkage and Subsidence ....................................... .... ........... 6 General Site Grading............................................ .............................._._...................................... 6 1. Site Clearing.......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas .............................. 6 3. Placement of Compacted Fill............................................................................................. 7 7 4. Preparation of Slab and Pavement Areas ................... 5. Testing and Inspection......................................................................................................... 7 GENERAL .................... 7 REFERENCES,.......................:.:.............................................................................................................. 8 ............................................................................................................ 9 APPENDIX A - Site Plan and Boring Logs Field Exploration APPENDIX B - Laboratory Testing Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX C - 2001 California Building Code with 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria January 28, 2005 -1- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Investigation performed In order to provide recommendations for site preparation and to assist in the design and construction of the foundations for the single-family residences proposed for the Madison Club golf course and residential development. The project site is located on the northeast corner of Avenue 54 and Madison Street in the City of La Quinta, California. The preliminary plans indicate that the proposed project will include an 18-hole golf course, clubhouse, and approximately 200 single-family residences along with various associated site improvements. The associated site improvements are expected to include paved roadways, concrete driveways and patios, underground utilities, and landscape areas. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to determine certain engineering characteristics of the near surface soil on the site in order to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. Our investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, literature review, engineering analysis and the preparation of this report. Evaluation of hazardous materials or other environmental concerns was not within the scope of services provided. Our investigation was performed in accordance with contemporary geotechnical engineering principles and practice. We do not make other warranty, either express or implied. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located on the northeast corner of Avenue 54 and Madison Street in the City of La Quinta, California. It is our understanding that the project will consist of an 18-hole golf course, clubhouse, and approximately 200 single-family residences along with various associated site improvements. It is our understanding that the proposed residences and clubhouse will be of relatively lightweight wood -frame construction and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings and concrete slabs on grade. The associated improvements will include paved roadways, concrete walkways, patios, driveways, landscape areas and various underground utilities. The majority of the subject site is presently vacant. The site includes several agricultural parcels as well as undeveloped desert land. Large tamarisk trees exist along the majority of the property lines within the southeastern portion of the site. The majority of the eastern portions of the property have been previously used for agricultural purposes. The property Is level throughout and is near the elevation of the adjacent properties and roadways. A horse ranch occupies the southeast comer of the site. The ranch contains several residential structures and various outbuildings. Fenced pastures occupy most of the ranch. Several other residences and structures exist at locations throughout the site. Avenue 54 forms the southern site boundary, Monroe Street forms the eastern site boundary, and Madison Street forms the western site boundary. The Hideaway development is located just west of the site, Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -2- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 Based upon our previous experience with lightweight residential structures, we expect that isolated column loads will be less than 30 kips and wall loading will be less than to 2.0 kips per linear foot. Grading is expected to include minor cuts and fills to match the nearby elevations and to construct slightly elevated building pads to accommodate site drainage. Extensive cuts are proposed for several of the golf holes with the preliminary plans indicating cuts in excess of 40 feet within some of the golf holes. This does not include removal and recompaction of the bearing soil within the building areas. If the anticipated foundation loading or site grading varies substantially from that assumed the recommendations included in this report should be reevaluated. GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY The project site is located within the central Coachella Valley that is part of the broader Salton Trough geomorphic province. The Salton Trough is a northwest trending depression that extends from the Gulf of California to the Banning Pass. Structurally the Salton Trough is dominated by several northwest trending faults, most notable of that is the San Andreas system. A relatively thick sequence of sedimentary rocks have been deposited in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough from Miocene to present times. These sediments are predominately terrestrial in nature with some lacustrian and minor marine deposits. The mountains surrounding the Coachella Valley are composed primarily of Precambrian metamorphic and Mesozoic granitic rock. The Coachella Valley is situated in one of the more seismically active areas of California. The San Andreas fault zone is considered capable of generating a maximum credible earthquake of magnitude 8.0 and because of its proximity to the project site the distance of approximately 9.2 kilometers should be considered in design fault for the project. Seismic activity along the nearby faults continues to affect the area and the Coachella Valley is considered one of the more seismically active regions in California. A computer program and pertinent geologic literature were utilized to compile data related to earthquake fault zones in the region and previous seismic activity that may have affected the site. E.Q. Fault Version 3.00 (Blake) provides a compilation of data related to earthquake faults in the region. The program searches available databases and provides both distances to causative faults and the corresponding accelerations that may be experienced on the site because of earthquake activity along these faults. The attenuation relationship utilized for this project was based upon Joyner & Boore (2001) attenuation curves. The information generated was utilized in our liquefaction evaluation The site is not located in any Earthquake Fault zones as designated by the State but is mapped in the County's Liquefaction and Ground Shaking Hazard Zone V. Several significant seismic events have occurred within the Coachella Valley during the past 50 years. The events include Desert Hot Springs - 1948 (6.5 Magnitude), Palm Springs - 1986 (5.9 Magnitude), Desert Hot Springs - 1992 (6.1 Magnitude), Landers -1992 (7.5 Magnitude) and Big Bear - 1992 (6.6 Magnitude). Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -3- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soil underlying the site consists primarily of fine-grained silty sands with scattered prominent sandy clay and sandy silt layers. As is typical for the area, the silty sand and sandy silt layers are inconsistently interbedded and vary in thickness. Silty sands were the most prominent soil within our exploratory borings but several prominent sandy silt and clayey silt layers were also encountered. The silty sands encountered near the existing ground surface appeared somewhat loose but the deeper silty sand and sandy silt layers appeared relatively firm. Relatively undisturbed samples indicated dry density varying from 84 to 121 pcf. Sampler penetration resistance (as measured by field blowcounts) indicates that density generally increases with depth. The site soil was dry on the surface and moist below a depth of approximately 5 feet but some silty layers were typically wet. Laboratory testing indicated moisture content varying from 1 to 33 percent. Laboratory testing indicates that the surface soil within the upper 5 feet consist primarily of silty sands. Expansion testing indicates that the surface silty sands are generally non -expansive and are classified as "very low" expansion category soil in accordance with Table 18-1-B of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. Groundwater was encountered within our borings at depths of approximately 51 to 79 feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater should be considered in design and construction. LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction occurs with sudden loss of soil strength because of rapid increases in pore pressures within cohesionless soil as a result of repeated cyclic loading during seismic events. Several conditions must be present for liquefaction to occur including; the presence of relatively shallow groundwater, generally loose soil conditions, the susceptibility of soil to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics and the generation of significant and repeated seismically induced ground accelerations. Liquefaction affects primarily loose, uniform grained cohesionless sands with low relative densities. In the case of this project site, several of the factors required for liquefaction to occur are not present. As previously indicated, groundwater was encountered within our borings at depths of approximately 51 to 79 feet below the existing ground surface on the site. Because of the depth to groundwater, the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is considered negligible. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our field investigation and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the proposed golf course, clubhouse, and residential development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in building foundation design and site preparation. Because of the somewhat loose condition of the near surface soil, remedial grading is recommended for the building areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and recompaction of the primary foundation bearing soil. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site Grading section of this report. Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -4 Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 Based upon the depth to groundwater and the generally firm condition of the deeper sand layers, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction affecting the site is negligible. The remedial grading recommended for building areas will result in the construction of a uniform compacted soil mat beneath all footings. In our opinion, liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the site grading and foundation design recommendations included in this report should not be necessary. The site is located in one of the more seismically active areas in California. Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of the structure should be acknowledged. The accelerations that may be experienced on the site (as previously discussed) should be considered in design. The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minimum design criteria. Pertinent 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria is summarized in Appendix C. Caving did occur within our borings and the potential for caving should be expected witlun deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSHA excavation criteria. On the basis of our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the near surface silty sands will be classified by CalOSHA as Type C. Soil conditions should be verified in the field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The near surface soil encountered during our investigation was found to be non -expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 0 for the surface silty sands that corresponds with the "very low" expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-I-B. The following recommendations present more detailed design criteria which have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation. The recommendations are based upon non -expansive soil criteria. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings that are supported upon properly compacted soil, may be expected to provide adequate support for the proposed structure foundations. Building pad grading should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and firm bearing conditions for the structure foundations. Footings should extend at least 12 inches beneath lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings should be at least two feet square and continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Continuous footings may be designed using an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot (psf) and isolated pad footings may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 1800 psf. Allowable increases of 250 psf for each additional 1 foot of width and 250 psf for each additional 6 inches of depth may be utilized if desired. The maximum allowable bearing pressure should be 2500 psf. The allowable bearing pressures are applicable to dead and frequently applied live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by 1/3 to resist wind and seismic loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soil is not allowed to become saturated from the ponding of rainwater or irrigation. Drainage from the building area should be rapid and complete. Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -5• Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 The recommendations provided in the preceding paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings will be supported upon properly compacted engineered fill soil. All grading should be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soil Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be approximately one inch when using the recommended bearing; values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 between soil and concrete may be used with consideration to dead load forces only. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings that are poured against properly compacted native or approved non -expansive import soil. Passive earth pressure should be ignored within the upper 1 foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Retaining Walls: Retaining walls may be necessary to accomplish the proposed construction. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pcf for level free -draining native backfill conditions. For walls that are to be restrained at the top, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 55 pcf for level free - draining native backfill conditions. Backdrains should be provided for the full height of the walls. Expansive Soil: Because of the prominence of "very low" expansion category soil near the surface, the expansion potential of the foundation bearing soil should not be a controlling factor in foundation or floor slab design, Expansion potential should be reevaluated subsequent to grading. Concrete Slabs -on -Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted non -expansive fill thickness of 24 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor slab is not desired, we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break. Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaining uniform concrete curing. Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures should not be necessary. However, reinforcement will have a beneficial effect in containing cracking because of concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs -on -grade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Slander Engineering January 28, 2005 -6- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soil have not yet been determined but native soil in the area has been known to be potentially corrosive with respect to concrete. The use of Type V cement and specialized sulfate resistant concrete mix designs may be necessary for concrete in contact with the native soil. Tentative Pavement Design: All paving should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base). This may be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. R-Value testing was not conducted during our investigation but based upon the sandy nature of the surface soil, an R-Value of approximately 50 appears appropriate for preliminary pavement design. The following preliminary onsite pavement section is based upon a design R-Value of 50. Onsite Pavement (Traffic Index = 5.0) Use 3.0 inches of asphalt on 4.5 inches of Class 2 base material Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard Specifications, January 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CaiTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations during placement. Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of site grading when the subgrade soil is in -place. This will include sampling and testing of the actual subgrade soil and an analysis based upon the specific traffic information Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage could vary from 20 to 25 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted should be between 1 and 3 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses that will occur because of the stripping of the organic material from the site and the removal of oversize material. The shrinkage losses are suspected to be somewhat less within areas where deeper cuts (more than 20 feet in depth) are planned. General Site Grading: All grading should be performed in accordance with the grading ordinance of the City of La Quinta, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory testing and are intended to provide a uniform compacted mat of soil beneath the building slabs and foundations. 1. Site Clearing: Proper site clearing will be very important. Any existing vegetation, slabs, foundations, abandoned underground utilities or irrigation lines should be removed from the proposed building areas and the resulting excavations should be properly backfilled. Soil that is disturbed during site clearing should be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soil Engineer. Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -7- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: In order to provide adequate and uniform bearing conditions, we recommend overexcavation throughout the proposed residential building areas. The building areas should be overexcavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below existing grade or 3 feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. The exposed soil should then be scarified to a depth of 1-foot, moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The excavated material may then be replaced as engineered fill material as recommended below. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Within the building pad areas, fill materials should be spread in thin lifts, and compacted at near optimum moisture content to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported fill material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor shall notify the Soil Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of importing soil in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site that complies with the project specifications. Approval by the Soil Engineer will be based upon material delivered to the site and not the preliminary evaluation of import sources. Our observations of the materials encountered during our investigation indicate that compaction within the native soil will be most readily obtained by means of heavy rubber tired equipment and/or sheepsfoot compactors. The moisture content of the near surface soils was somewhat inconsistent within our borings. In general, the sandy soils are dry and well below optimum moisture content but some of the deeper silt layers were wet. It is likely that wet silt/clay layers will be encountered during grading particularly in irrigated areas where deep cuts are planned. A uniform and near optimum moisture content should be maintained during fill placement and compaction. 4. Preparation of SIab and Paving Areas: All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving or exterior concrete slabs -on -grade, should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation, scarification and recompaction of the surface, and replacement of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. Compaction of the slab and pavement areas should be to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations should be performed by the Soil Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being performed in accordance with the project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable ASTM test standards. The minimum acceptable degree of compaction shall be 90 percent of the maximum dry density as obtained by the ASTM D1557-91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -8- Project No. 5444810 05-01-101 GENERAL The findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building area. Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this report, this office should be notified. This report is considered to be applicable for use by East of Madison, LLC, for the specific site and project described herein. The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon monitoring of the grading operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our review of the grading operations and additional testing, if indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to coordinate any required site visits by our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering. We recommend that a pre -job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The purpose of this meeting will be to assure a complete understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. Sladden Engineering January 28, 2005 -9- Project No. 544-4810 05-01-101 REFERENCES ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, April 1974. Boore, Joyner and Fumal (1994) Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from North Anzericnn Earthquakes, U. S. Geological Survey, Open File Reports 94-127 and 93-509. Finn, W. E. Liam, (1996) EvnIuation of Liquefaction Potential for Different Earthquake Magnitudes and Site Conditions, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Committee. Joyner and Boore, (1988) Measurements, Clnaraeterizntion and Prediction of Strong Ground Motion, ASCE Journal of Geotech nical Engineering, Special Publication No. 20. Lee & Albaisa (1974) "Earthquake Induced Settlements in Saturated Sands". Seed and ldriss (1982) Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph. Seed, Tokimatsu, Harder and Chung, (1985), Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 11.1, No. 12, December. Rogers, Thomas H., Geologic Map of California, Santa Ana Map Sheet. Riverside County, 1984, Seismic Safety Element of the Riverside County General Plan Sladden Engineering