BWFE2019-0111 Revision 1AP, 11 f 1IN4 I
ta�PERMIT
CALIFORNIA
#BWFE2019-
PLAN LOCATION:
Project Address: 5q700 MADAGASAR WAY
Project Description:
APN #:
CHANGES TO WALL DETAIL - SITE SPECIFIC
ENGINEERING
Applicant Name:LENNAR HOMES OF CALIF
Address:980 MONTECITO DR
City, ST, Zip:CORONA CA 92879
Telephone:9518173663
Email:
Project Valuation $
Contractor Name:SAME AS APPLICANT
New Construction:
Address:
Conditioned Space SF
City, St, Zip
Garage SF
Telephone:
Patio/Porch SF
Email:
Fire Sprinklers SF
State Lic:728102 City Bus Lic:
Architect/Engineer Name:
Construction Occupancy:
Address:
Grading:
City, St, Zip
Telephone:
Bedrooms:
Stories:
# Units:
Email:
State Lic: City Bus Lic:
Property Owner's Name:SAME AS APPLICANT
New Commercial / Tenant Improvements:
Address:
Total Building SF
City, ST, Zip
Construction Type: Occupancy:
Telephone:
Email:
78495 CALLE TAMPICO
LA QUINTA, CA 92253
760-777-7000
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
— —
— — — PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
---�•
RIGHT-OF-WAY (R/W)
--
+— WATER MAIN
—
—S — SEWER MAIN
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER METER
5
SEWER LATERAL
VI i !' OF Imo% OUi1V
BUILDING DIVISION
1gt _ REVIEWED FOR
CODE
COMPLIANCE
S8.1 Length 138' bATE
- EY
V
1 FG 4
TF 466.8) 138ft
474-67
') 468.00 tO
\ �0
AA
LOT 154
,yp1 PLAN 1 XA
Z FF 469.47
PE 468.8
77
7Q
474,57
lrt `I f TW 1,74.67
TF 468.
TN
l TF
22.96'
23 ft
MADAGASCAR WAY
�QR-(� THE TITLE REP
BUILDING CEONS ANDNOT/NARETO NOTE: PLOT ORDIMEENSIO SSEASEMEMAY ONTS,AOW CU NDOTHERiNFORMATTIIONOF ECORD.DRYUTIOLTESARE NOORT
ARCHITECTURAL POP -OUTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.
MSA CONSULTING, INC. LENNAR / GRIFFIN RANCH MARCH 2O19
>PLANNING>CIVIL ENGINEge,CA9 LAND SURVEYING TRACT NO. 32879
76032 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, C4 927/0 LOT AREA
760320.9B11 msaconsultinginccom (0
LENNAR
980 MONTECITO DRIVE
CORONA, CA 92879
roci� ni�_�cca
WALL PLAN - LOT 154 14,495 SF
54-700 Madagascar Way
SCALE 1'=30'
LA QUINTA. RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
oil\
1kAfjAC ASr_A /1 (tj.4Y
GITy AEw1
.W OF LA QUINTA
BUILDING DIVISION
REVIEWED FOR
CODE
COMPLIANCE
DATES boll L01---BY
CITY
MAX WALL
MIN FTG
1
HEIGHT
SPACING
6" CMU
WIDTH
Oj
O.C.
4'..8' O.C.
2
EQ EQ
J
3
KEYNOTES
1. POST TENSION ROD. REFER TO
SCHEDULE FOR SPACING
2. HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCING
PER GSN. PLACE IN FIRST TWO
JOINTS BELOW PLATE WASHER
AND 2'-0" O.C. THEREAFTER
UNTIL THE TOP OF FOOTING IS
REACHED
3. (2) 4 CONT REINF ((1) MIN AT
PT OD)
4. TOP OF LEVEL NATURAL GRADE
OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE
5. 3" MORTAR COVER AROUND
COUPLER AND POST
TENSIONED ROD AT FIRST
COURSE
6. #4 HORIZ BAR AT 48" O.C.
7. EXISTING CMU RETAINING WALL
BY OTHERS
NOTES
A. REFER TO GSN AND TYPICAL
DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS AND ITEMS
SHOWN BUT NOT NOTED
B. WALL SHALL NOT BE USED AS A
FLOOD WALL OR OTHERWISE
SURCHARGED, UNO
C. PLACE FIRST BLOCK INTO WET
CONC TO RECESS 1/2" MIN,
3/4" MAX
D. SPECIAL INSPECTION AS
REQUIRED BY JURISDICTION
TYP PROTO II 6" CMU FENCE WALL W/ CONT SPREAD FOOTING
NO SCALE
PROJECT: PROTO II STANDARD PLANS
E
WIND EXPOSURE C AT 110 MPH
LA QUINTA, CA
TITLE: TYPICAL DETAILS
C REV 0
DESCRIPTION
DATE
A
�G
PROTO-IITM WALL SYSTEMS
DATE: 05-29-18
R I M R O C C K E E N N G I N E E R I N G
3612 CALIFORNIA AVE ATTN: MARIO SALAZAR
PROJ No :STD
9080 W. CHEYENNE AVE STE 120
LAVEGAS, NV 89129
LONG BEACH, CA 90807 PH# (562) 477-8529
www.proto2.com msalazar protoii.com
SHEET:
CSi,
vv
-
PH: 702-838-5311
U S PATENTED 5,794,921, & 6,431,797, a 7,188,453, 8 6,632,048, 7,454,870, 8 7,461,487
PROTO-II WALL SYSTEMS MAY ONLY BE INSTALLED BY APPROVED AND CERTIFIED INSTALLERS
RIM ROCKENGIN EERING
9080 W. Cheyenne Ave., Ste 120
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Ph: (702) 838-5311
Fx: (702) 838-5339
www. Rim RockEngineeringcom
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
JURISDICTION:
PROJECT NO:
CLIENT:
DATE:
2016 CBC Proto-II Standard Plans
110 MPH
La Quinta, CA
Std Plan
Proto-II
August 22, 2019
SHEET INDEX
BASIS FOR DESIGN 1
CALCULATIONS _ 2
Ty OF LA 7FOR
i�
BUILDING DI
REVIEWED
CODE
COMPLIANCE
DATL�gy�
Sift, Spec: nlcc
par+ 113
n"n A
Eyt5 ►y
THESE CALCULATIONS ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF RIM ROCK ENGINEERING AND MAY
NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
CALCULATIONS ARE VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND LOCATION
AND ARE NOT VALID UNLESS ENGINEERS ORIGINAL WET SIGNED SEAL IS AFFIXED
r �ti 1
+� C
W E- Z� Fri
cr-, No. C6961 6 --�u
OF CALF
8/22/2019
c try
6.00' Proto II Fence
Soil Parameters
Passive Pressure at Trench Fig (pcf): 125
Bearing Pressure (psf): 1500
Soil Weight (pcf): 120
Material Parameters
Full Stresses:
N
Special Inspection:
N
Concrete fc (psi):
2500
Masonry f m (psi):
2000
Fy PT Rod/Reinf (ksi):
60
Rod Tension (Ib):
4400
Max Rod Tension (Ib):
5412
Rod As (in2):
015033
Tested Wall Moment Capacity (lb-ft):
2940
Em (ksi):
1800
Es (ksi):
29000
Concrete Weight (pcf):
150
Wall
C M.0 width
Height (ft) (in) Spacing
Fence: 6 5 625 72 in o c
CYII.,
RIM R❑ C K E N G IN E E R I N G
Wall & Footing Geometry
Embedment (in): 12
Passive depth to ignore (in): 0
Footing Configuration: Centered
Min Fig Cover at Trench Ftg (in): 4
Wind Load Parameters
Use Tested Wall
Capacity
Y
Exposure:
C
Wind Speed (mph):
110
Dir. Factor (Kd):
0.85
Topo Factor (Kzt):
10
Gust Factor (G):
0.85
Ext Press. Coeff. (Cf :
14
Vel Exp Coeff (Kz):
085
Wind Pressure (psf):
266
Add'[ Loading Conditions
Vertical Wall line load (plf):
0
Horiz Load, unfactored (pll):
0 W
Dist above ftg to Horiz line load (ft):
0
Flood Depth (in):
0
Flood fluid weight (pcf):
0
Flood location:
Toe
Seismic toad Parameters
Short Period Acc'I (Ss):
2.068
1 sec Period Acdl (S1):
1,004
Site Class:
D
Response Coeff (R):
3
Importance Factor:
1
Design Spect'I Response (Sds):
1,379
Design Spect'I Response (Shc):
1.004
Seismic Design Category:
D
Seismic Response Coeff (Cs):
0.46
Seismic Weight (psf):
32
Seismic Pressure (psf):
14.71
CITY OF LA QUINTA
BUILDING DIVISION
REVIEWED FOR
CODE
Loading
Allowable
Max
V (Ib) M (lb-ft)
M (lb-ft)
Spacing (ft)
Wind: 160 479
2940
6.14 ok
DATE
By
Seismic: 88 265
2940
11.11 ok
Stability - Spread Ft
Fig W (ft): 2,58
Overturning
Bearing
Ftg T (in): 10
Mot (k-ft) Mr (k-ft) F.S
q max (psf)
q allow (psl) q min (psf)
Toe (in): 1.00
Wind
0.36 054 1 51
477 <
2000 ok 0
# Cont Bars: (3) #4
Seismic
0.24 054 2.28
89 <
2000 ok 92
8
Y
N
Footing Rei
Bar # Spacing Clr As a d (in) Mu (k-ft) Mn (k-ft) Vu (k) Vc (k)
Trans Bot: # 4 @ 0 in o.c 2 000 < 055
Trans Top: # 4 @ 48 in o.c 3 005 012 675 048 < 1 51 ok 025 < 689
Trench: # 4 @ 0 in o c. 4
Project: 2016 CBC Proto-11 Standard Plans Project No.: Std Plan
Location: 110 MPH Sheet No.: 52
6.67' Proto II Fence
Soil Parameters
Passive Pressure at Trench Fig (pct): 125
Bearing Pressure (psf): 1500
Soil Weight (pcf): 120
Material Parameters
Full Stresses:
N
Special Inspection:
N
Concrete fc (psi):
2500
Masonryfm (psi):
2000
Fy PT Rod/Reinf (ksi):
60
Rod Tension (Ib):
4400
Max Rod Tension (lb):
5412
Rod As (in2):
0-15033
Tested Wall Moment Capacity (lb-ft):
2940
Ern (ksi):
1800
Es (ksi):
29000
Concrete Weight (pcf):
150
Wall
CMU
RIM R❑ CKL N v ii.
Wall & Footin¢ Geomet
Embedment (in): 12
Passive depth to ignore (in): 0
Footing Configuration: Centered
Min Ftg Cover at Trench Ftg (in): 4
Wind Load Parameters
C.M.U. width Use Tested Wall
Height (ft) (in) Spacing Capacity
Fence: 667 5.625 56 in o c. Y
Loading
V (lb) M (lb-ft)
Wind: 177 592
Seismic: 98 327
Stability - Spread Ft
Exposure:
C
Wind Speed (mph):
110
Dir. Factor (Kd):
0,85
Topo Factor (Kzt):
1.0
Gust Factor (G):
0.85
Ext Press. Coeff. (Cf):
1-4
Vel Exp Coeff. (Kz):
0,85
Wind Pressure (pso:
26.6
Allowable
Max
M (lb-ft)
Spacing (ft)
2940
4,97 ok
2940
8.99 ok
Add'l Loading Conditions
_
Vertical Wall line load (plf):
0
Horiz Load, unfactored (pll):
0 W
Dist above ftg to Horiz line load (ft):
0
Flood Depth (in):
0
Flood fluid weight (pcf):
0
Flood location:
Toe
Seismic Load Parameters
Short Period Acdl (Ss):
2.068
1 sec Period Acc'I (St):
1.004
Site Class:
D
Response Coeff (R):
3
Importance Factor:
1
Design Spect'I Response (Sds):
1.379
Design Spect'I Response (Shc):
1.004
Seismic Design Category:
D
Seismic Response Coeff (Cs):
0.46
Seismic Weight (psf):
32
Seismic Pressure (psf):
14.71
CITY OF LA QUINTA
BUILDING DIVISION
REVIEWED FOR
CODE
DATE_By
Ftg W (ft): 2.92 Overturning Bearing
Ftg T (in): 10 Mot (k-ft) Mr (k-ft) F S. q max (psf) q allow (psf) q min (psf)
Toe (in): 1.00 Wind 0.43 068 1 58 381 < 2000 ok 0
# Cont Bars: #DIV/01 Seismic 029 068 239 80 < 2000 ok 99
8
Y
N
Bar# Spacing Clr As
Trans Bot: # 4 @ 0 in o.c. 2
Trans Top: # 4 @ 48 in o,c. 3
Trench: # 4 @ 0 in o.c. 4
a d (in) Mu (k-ft) Mn (k-ft) Vu (k) Vc (k)
0.00 < 1.39
0.59 < 0,93
Project 2016 CBC Proto-H Standard Plans Project No.: Std Plan
Location: 110 MPH Sheet No.: 52
peion
PAGE 1 OF 53
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #2
PROJECT
"Griffin Ranch"
OFT.1 J.N.
6119-2317
LOCATION
Griffin Ranch Community
CLIENT J.N.
n/a
La Quinta, CA
CODE
C15C 2016 (design)
CLIENT
Lennar Homes -Inland Division
SITE
n(a
CONTACT
Shelly Jordan, Project Manager
CELL
(951) 258-8688
SUBJECT
Structural Investigation of Existing Site walls
EMAIL
g.11e114jpro8n0lcnnar.cam
DATE
May 2, 2019
PRINCIPAL
Ilia 5arad, P,E., 5.E., 5.E.C.5.
EMAIL
ilias@optlon-1.com
PROJECT ENG.
Enrique Ore, P.E.
EMAIL
: enriqueo0optie ri-1.com
INTRODUCTION
As requested, we have completed our structural investigation of existing site CMU walls as referenced
above. This office was asked to observe existing site walls for a5-built conditions. Site investigation
was conducted to verify construction of PROTO II wall as permitted by the city of La Quinta on 3/22/2017.
This investigation comprises of a limited visual observation of the CMU site wall around the Recreation
Retention area, and the review of the Field Verification Report by Southwest Inspections & Testing, Inc.
dated March 27, 2019.
This Specific Site Review Memorandum summarizes our findings. Additionally, the following letter is
based upon this ofPice's previous experience with projects of a similar type and accepted standard
engineering practice under the jurisdiction of the California Building Code (C8C), 2016 Edition.
PROJECT LOCATION and DESCRIPTION
The site CMU walls are part of the Griffin Ranch Community and are located around the Recreation
Retention area. Site walls are built by 8" CMU blocks for a retaining section of the wall and in some cases
6" CMU blocks topped with iron fencing above,
DESCRIPTION OF INVESTIGATION
The investigation included the following activities:
• Project site visit by an Option One Consulting Engineers representative. The goal of this observation
was to verify as -built conditions for site CMU walls. This investigation relied solely on visual observation
of the as -built CMU walls and is subject to all the limitations associates with such method.
• Review of Field Verification Report by Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc. dated March 27, 2019, as
submitted by the client. This report Is limited to homesites 149, 151, 152 and 154.
BUILDING DIVISION
REVIEWED FOR
COMPLIANCE
aATE H113l1 r
S' �'c SPeC � O
Par+ a,� 3
cotdlY
2317MEM02_51rz walls xlsx
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952
P i o n
s. ne
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM 02 PAGE 2 of 53
May 2, 2019
OBSERVATIONS and FINDINGS
The following is a cursory summary of the observed findings for site GMU walls. For a more detailed
representation of the as -built structural system, refer to the original construction documents.
517E CMU WALL5 at HOME5n5149 151152 154:
As -built conditions for Homesites 149,151, 152, and 154 consist of 8" CMU retaining wall with an
exposed height ranging from 32" to 45". As -Built site C.M.U. walls do not match PROTO II
Standard Plans. However, the following can be inferred based on initial site observation, and
information described in the Field Verification Report by Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc.
Lot 149 - Site Wall
1. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
2. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g... 4 .......
3. G.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement.........,.
4. C.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement........
5. Foundation Width ....................... I ......
.
6. Foundation depth ..............................
7. Foundation reinforcement ....................
• See retaining wall calculations #1
Lot 151 - 5ite Wall
1. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
2. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g...........
3. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement...........
4. C.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement........
5. Foundation Width ..............................
6. Foundation depth ..............................
7. Foundation reinforcement ...............:.....
• See retaining wall calculations #2
Lot 152 - Site Wall
1. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
2. C,M.U. wall height from top of ft'g...........
3. G.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement........,..
4. C.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement.........
5. Foundation Width ..............................
6. Foundation depth .............................
7. Foundation reinforcement .....................
• See retaining wall calculations #3
Lot 154 - 5ite Wall
1. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
2. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g...........
3. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement...........
4. C.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement........
5. Foundation Width ..............................
6. Foundation depth. I ............................
7. Foundation reinforcement ....... I ............
.
• See retalning wall calculations #4
n
Southwest Insp. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
8"
Sufficient
48"
Sufficient
#4 at 52" ac.
Sufficient
#4- at 24" o.c.
Sufficient
29"
Sufficient
13.5"
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o.c. each way
Sufficient
Southwest Insp. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
8"
Sufficient
39"
Sufficient
#4 at 24' to 48" o.c.
Sufficient
#4 at 24" o.c.
Sufficient
24"
Sufficient
13.5"
5uffcient
#4 at 5" to 6" o.c. each wa
Sufficient
Southwest Insp. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
8"
Sufficient
38"
Sufficient
#4 at 32" O.C.
Sufficient
#4 at 16" o.c.
Sufficient
39,
5ufficient
W,
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o.c. each way
Sufficient
Southwest Insp. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
8"
Sufficient
44"
Sufficient
#4 at 32" o.c.
Sufficient
#4 at 24 o.c.
Sufficient
34'
Sufficient
13.5"
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o c. each way
Sufficient
Fig. Existing
Conditions
Fig Existing
Conditions
Fig. Existing
Conditions
Fig. Existing
Conditions
2317MEMo2 Site-11 16.
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952
ption
ne
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #2 PAGE 3 of 53
May 2, 2019
51TE CMU WALLS at HOME51TE5149.151. 152,154 WITH ADDED 5URCHARGE LOAD:
A surcharge load equivalent to a 6" G.M.U. fence wall similar to those found on Homesites 139-147,
148, and Well lot, was applied near the top of these walls for conditions as described in the figures
1, 2 and 3 (see below), with the following results:
Fig. 1 Homesite 139-147 Conditions Fig. 2 Homesite 148 Conditions Fig. 3 Well Lot Conditions
Lot 149 - Site Wall
1. Added fence wall load ...........................
2. G.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
3. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g............
4. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement ............
5. G.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement........,
6. Foundation Width ......................... I.....
7. Foundation depth ...............................
8. Foundation reinforcement .....................
• 5ee retaining wall calculations #1-Fig. 1, 2 &
Lot 151 - Site Wall
1. Added fence wall load ...........................
2. G.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
3. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g......... ...
4. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement............
5. G.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement........,
6. Foundation Width ...............................
7. Foundation depth ...............................
8. Foundation reinforcement .....................
Southwest In5p. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
Yes'
Fig, 1, 2 & 3
8"
5uffcient
48"
Sufficient
#4 at 32" o.c.
Sufficient
#4 at 24' o.c.
Sufficient
29"
Sufficient
13.5"
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o.c. each way
5ufficient
Southwest Insp. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
Yes"
Fig. 1, 2 & 3
8"
Sufficient
39"
Sufficient
#4 at 24" to 48" o.c.
Sufficient
#4 at 24" o.c.
Sufficient
24'
Sufficient
13.5"
Sufficient
#4 at 5" to G" o_c. each w
5uffcient
• 5ee retaining wall calculations #2-Fig. 1, 2 & 3
Lot 152 - Site Wall
1. Added fence wall load ...........................
2. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
3. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g............
4. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement............
5. G.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement.........
6. Foundation Width ...............................
7, Foundation depth ...............................
8. Foundation reinforcement .....................
Southwest Inep. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
Yes"
Fig. 1, 2 & 3
81'
Sufficient
38"
5ufficient
#4 at 52" o.c.
5uf iicient
#4 at 15" o.c.
Sufficient
35"
Sufficient
14"
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o.c, each way
Sufficient
• 5ee retaining wall calculations #3-Fig.1, 2 & 3
Lot 154 - 5ite, Wall
1. Added fence wall load ..........................
2. C.M.U. wall thickness ...........................
3. C.M.U. wall height from top of ft'g............
4. C.M.U. wall vertical reinforcement............
5. G.M.U. wall horizontal reinforcement.......::
6. Foundation Width ...............................
7. Foundation depth ...............................
8. Foundation reinforcement .....................
Southwest Inep. & Testing
Report #190074
Remark
Yes*
Fig. 1. 2 & 3
8"
Sufficient
44'
Sufficient
#4 at 32" o.c.
Sufficient
#4 at 24 o.c.
Sufficient
34'
5ufficient
13.5"
Sufficient
#4 at 12" o.c. each way
Sufficient
• 5ee retaining wall calculations #4-Fig. 1, 2 &
* Not a part of Southwest Insp. & Testing Report #190074
2317MEM02_51c walla xlex
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952
ption
ne
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #2 PAGE 4 OF 53
May 2, 2019
NOTES and LIMITATIONS
Our analysis and calculations for existing cantilever retaining walls are based on the following:
• Project site visit by an Option One Consulting Engineers representative, The goal of this observation
was to verify as -built conditions, and overall assessment of the site CMU walls. This investigation relied
solely on visual observation of the as -built GMU walls, as well as a review of available documentations.
This investigation Is subject to all the limitations associated with such method.
• Review of Field Verification Report #190074 by Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc. dated March
27, 2019, as submitted by the client. This report is limited to homesites 149,151,152 and 154.
• Site information provided by the developer.
Our service has been performed within the prescribed limits in a manner consistent with that level of
skill and care ordinarily exercised by other professional consultants under similar circumstances.
The Information presented in this letter is considered valid as of this date. As new and/or amended
information becomes available, we reserve the right to revise and resubmit as necessary.
This letter only provides an additional technical support service for Client to further evaluate any
remedial actions necessary for review with EOR. This letter represents our opinion In solving the a5-built
field condition and/or achieve the builder's request.
If you should have any questions and need additional clarification on items listed above, please do not
hesitate to contact our office at (714) 556-1916.
pVL4FESS1
5�
�,`�4
Submitted by: �, p 11
OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS I�14.
rn
This document must bearan original' WET' signature and seal for all submittal purposes. °C NO. S 3855
* Exp, 3/31/2020
Enrique Ore, P.E. Ilia 5arad, P.E., 5.E., 5.E.C,13, LP�9%rpRUCT BRA �tiP
Project Engineer Principal OF CA1.1{'dEi
Distribution: Shelly Jordan May 2, 2019
STAMP OF ENGINEER -OF -RECORD
Attachments: Vicinity Map & Partial Site Plan
2317MEM02 5ic walls 1.
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952
f
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #2
May 2, 2019
VICINITY MAP
ption
ne
PAGE 5 OF 53
� ,, � i i'�y .r .�� •.rsr •.�- � f, Sit:,
_. l •" ..1 y") - r • + `' •�:Ttb ,S�'1Z7 Cam" 77 -[ J 7f 1 • jj
r �� � -� s:�r • i :�'fY<[:Z� � irrK {�•if:�:f'yalr -�:—` �•�• - 4.
o.
' ;� ' '• ' .- ._-- ,r; ,ram; - � i • a r� •,
' '.c+"Li..• ,.mot-.�T �• �-�« R .r��+4a� -`. •. ..��:.�r —��-•!�.?y••�-- �yd
f r-T l I�
Vicinity Map with Recreation Retention area (images by Google Maps)
2317MEM02_5ic wall, b.
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714,556.1952
ption
ne
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #2
May 2, 2019
SITE PLAN.
PAGE 6 OF 53
138 �. a 139-
f4Q 141 142 143 144
RECREATION
RETENTION
LOT •AU•
154 153 152 1
o .7 _ - - (/j Ems' ftli
CO it
+�R
163 164 ; 151 1 J
158
t I,.
it i 150 145 _
159 .� , 162 165 5 `a
r�
_ i t I 149 146 _.;.
�• l It _ _ ' t'
I �
166
148 147 ;
Combo Wall ' I
Retaining Wall only - _ - - , - —
Homesites around Recreation Retention area (Image provide by Shelly Jordan)
2317MEM02 5iu-11-1-
Option One Tel 714.566.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149
Dsgnr: eo
Description...
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
Page: 1
Date: 23 APR 2019
RetainPro (F) 1987-2018, Build 11.18A2.04
License: KW-D6067268 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
] Soil Data
Retained Height
= 3.25 ft
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Wall height above soil
= 0.75 ft
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure - 0.4 psf/ft
Slope Behind Wall
= 0.00
Height of Soil over Toe
= 2.50 in
=
Water height over heel
= 0.0 ft
Passive Pressure = 250.0 psf/ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem i
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
15 18 OK
Sliding =
2022.OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,102 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 1.16 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
346 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
565 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than
Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
467 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
762 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
1.6 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.9 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
23.9 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
57.5 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
424.9 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingliSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
27.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
4.00 ft
...Height to Bottom =
3.25 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Service Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Fit"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
=
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs=
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#
Strength Level
ft- # =
Moment..... Allowable
=
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear. ...Allowable
psi =
Anet(Masonry)
in2=
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data --- - -
-
Bottom
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load -
0.0 Ibs
Footing Width -
0.50 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.00 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.187
22.4
75.7
432.2
0.9
45.0
23.77
3.75
fm
psi =
1.500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation
of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf=
55.0
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in =
4.90
Dead Load
1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load
1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H
1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W
1.000
fc
psi=
Seismic, E
1.000
Fy
psi=
f
rr
izt t4.�t-
.l` �� r
I
N
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch p
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 2
2765 Bristol Street, Sulte 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
This Wall in File: \\option 3\e ng in 1 \2300's\231 7-g riffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2018, Build 11.18.12.04
License : Kw-06067288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Toe Width
= 0.67 ft
Heel Width
= 1.75
Total Footing Width
= 2.42
Footing Thickness
= 12 00 in
Key Width = 12.00 in
Key Depth = 0.00 in
Key Distance from Toe = 2.00 ft
fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi
Footing Concrete Density = 150.00 pcf
Min. As % - 0.0018
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Footing Design Results
I
Toe
Heel
Factored Pressure = 467
762 psf
Mu': Upward = 111
0 ft-#
Mu': Downward = 71
497 ft-#
Mu: Design = 40
497 ft-#
Actual 1-Way Shear = 1.61
5.85 psi
Allow 1-Way Shear - 40.00
40.00psi
Toe Reinforcing = # 4 @ 15.99 in
Heel Reinforcing = # 4 @ 17.99 in
Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.63 1n2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.26 in2 /It
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 9.26 in #4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 14.35 in #5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 20.37 in #6@ 40.74 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING....,
Force Distance Moment Force Distance
Moment
Item Ibs ft ft_# Ibs ft
ft-#
Heel Active Pressure = 3.6 1.42 5.1 Soil Over Heel = 422.5 1.88
793.6
Surcharge over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load =
Added Lateral Load = 20.3 4.63 93.7 Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0 1.00
40.1
Load @ Stem Above Soil = * Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0 1.00
40.1
= Soil Over Toe = 16.8 034
5.6
Surcharge Over Toe =
Total 23.9 O.T.M. 98.8 Stem Weight(s) = 220.0 1.00
220.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
_ = Footing Weight = 363.0 1.21
439.2
Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 15.18 Key Weight = 2.50
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,102.3 Ibs Vert. Component = 2.42
Total = 1,062.3 Ibs R.M.=
1,499.3
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defi @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.000 in
The abQve calculation is not vpfid if the heel wil bearing ressure exceeds chat of the t
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil_
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch C�
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 3 J
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987.2018, Build 11.13.12.04
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
8" ;• / 44@ 32"
4._0-
Q,16.in
(!,D Toe
L; Heel
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number; griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
Page: 4
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1957-2018, Build 11.18.12.04
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O LL=40# Ecc=O"
27 00pst
i, J E rvic e-Level )�
Pp= 07-51 #z
n
rn
r.
r
Lr,
24#
19
0
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
Page: 1 I 1
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2018, Build 11.18.12.04
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Retained Height =
3.17 ft
Wall height above soil =
0.75 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
5.50 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Axial Dead Load =
0,0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
13.02 OK
Sliding
27.49 OK
Total Bearing Load - 899 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 0.91 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
347 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
551 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than
Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
465 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
737 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
1.1 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
3.2 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
19.3 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
188.4 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
343.5 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
Footingl]Soil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
27.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.75 ft
...Height to Bottom =
3.17 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Service Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
it =
Wall Material Above "Ht"
-
Design Method
-
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
=
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
Strength Level
ft-#=
Moment..... Allowable
-
Shear ..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shea r.....Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
00 Ibs
Footing Width =
0.50 ft
Eccentricity -
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist
0.00 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall -
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Bottom
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
48.00
Center
0.204
17.7
56.3
292.1
1.1
44.9
15.85
3.75
fm
psi=
1,500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation
of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf =
490
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in =
4.60
Dead Load
1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load
1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H
1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W
1.000
fc
psi =
Seismic, E
1.000
Fy
psi =
A�. --I+-2
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 12
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 2
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2018, Build 11.18.12.04
License: KW-06057288
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
0.67 ft
Tog
Heel
Heel Width =
1.33
Factored Pressure
= 465
737 psf
Total Footing Width -
2.00
Mu': Upward
= 111
0 ft_#
Footing Thickness -
13.50 in
Mu': Downward
= 90
218 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 21
218 ft-#
Key Width =
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.07
3.17 psi
Key Depth =
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
2.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.58 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 ift
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
,.,.,OVERTURNING..... ...RESISTING.... .
Force Distance
M
Moment Force Distance
Moment
Item Ibs ft
ft-# Ibs ft
ft-#
Heel Active Pressure = 3.7 1.43
5.3 Soil Over Heel = 252.3 1.67
421.0
Surcharge over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Surcharge Over Toe =
Surcharge Over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Added Lateral Load = 15.7 4.59
71 8 Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0 1.00
401
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
*Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0 1.00
40.1
=
Soil Over Toe = 36.9 0.34
12.3
Surcharge Over Toe =
Total 19.3 O.T.M.
77.1 Stem Weight(s) = 192.1 1.00
192.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
_ =
Footing Weight = 337.5 1.00
337.5
Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 13.02
Key Weight = 2.50
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 898.8
Ibs Vert. Component = 2.00
Total = 858.8 Ibs R.M.=
1,003.7
*Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
Desistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
I Tilt -
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due.
to seftl_ement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only)
0.000 in
The above calculation is not valid if the he eI soil be
a nng pressure exceeds that of the toe.
because II wo u Id t hen tend to rotate into the
retained soil.
4�_
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 13
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
As per field obs. 01/29/2019 & tech test
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2018, Build 11.18.12.04
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,ACI 530-1
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
#1@16.in
Q Toe
fil,g18..
@ Heel
�2
3 -11"
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 4
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
As per field obs. 01129/2019 $ tech test
This Wall in File: 1loption3lengin112300's12317-griffin rancMgriff in ranch.rpx
etafnPW tej 1s87-2018. Bui d 11.18.12.04
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACl 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O.LL=40# Ecc=O'
27.00psf
(Service -Level)
Pp= 100.37#Z=
U5
Q
Q
co
m
ri-
ir..
fri
err
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 15
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetaInPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.05
License: Kw-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria i
Retained Height =
3.08 It
Wall height above soil =
0.08 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
1.00 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem II
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
30.48 OK
Sliding =
27.05 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,204 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 2.87 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
210 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
618 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
284 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
836 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
1.2 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.3 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
19.8 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force =
70.3 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
465.5 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 1200.in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
27.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.17 ft
...Height to Bottom =
2.17 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment..... Allowable
-
Shear ..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data
Bottom
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
0.0 Ibs
Footing Width -
0.00 ft
Eccentricity
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist -
0.00 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall -
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0 300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.114
18.1
45.2
432.2
0.8
44.7
23.77
375
fm
psi= 1,500
Fs
psi = 20,000
Solid Grouting
= No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS Modular Ratio 'n'
= 21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures. W II W ' ht
f- 55 0
Load Factors -
Building Code
Dead Load
Live Load
Earth, H
Wind, W
Seismic, E
CBC 2016,AC1
1.200
1.600
1.600
1.000
1.000
a eig ps -
Short Term Factor = 1.000
Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 4.90
Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight
Masonry Design Method = ASD
Concrete Data '--
fc PSI =
Fy psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch I r
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 2 y�
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
rceraenrro tc? ianr-eu-m, t uirn r.�7.vs.ue
License: KW-06057288
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,ACI 316-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
1.08 ft
Tog
Heel
Heel Width =
1.83
Factored Pressure
= 284
836 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.91
Mu': Upward
= 205
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
14.00 in
Mu': Downward
= 169
569 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 36
569 ft-#
Key Width -
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.20
5.28 psi
Key Depth -
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe -
2 00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm: 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)`Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.88 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.30 in2 rft
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal
bars:
#4@ 7.94 in #4@ 15.87 in
#5@ 12.30 in #5@ 24.60 in
#6@ 17.46 in #6@ 34 92 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
..
.....OVERTURNING........RESISTING.....
Force Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item Ibs ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 3.6 1.42
5A Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 430.0
2.33
1,001.1
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.2 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
2.33
1.001.1
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
2.33
Buoyant Force = 1.46
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 3.6 1.42
5.1 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.41
56.5
Adjacent Footing Load =
*Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.41
56.5
Added Lateral Load = 16.2 3.84
62.2 Soil Over Toe = 10.8
0.54
5.8
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
_
Stem Weight(s) = 173.8
1.41
245.6
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight = 509.3
1.46
741.0
Total = 19.8 O.T.M. =
70.4 Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =
30.48 Vert. Component =
2.91
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,203.8 Ibs Total = 1,163.8
Ibs R.M.=
2,106.6
* Axi,=1 live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
riL3istance, but is included for soil pressure
calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds th_aE_of the IQe
because_�fL�wall wo � en tend to rotate rn he�etain�d sail.
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 17
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1937-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
Lic:enso : KW06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To : OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
1"
@ Toe
4@18-
@ Heel
.L
3"
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch I
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 4
25
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date. 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3Wngin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
metamrru ju) iaai-au-iv, ounu n.1a.us.u0
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To : OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=u ,LL=:.' O# , I
2?.00psf
f Stre ngth-Level;®
Pp= 70.31#
20#
C
Q Q ® Wdrostatic Force
r
`"• Lateral earth pressure due to the soil BELO''A. watertahle
CDti
0
"�l
I
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
This Wall in File:
7-griffin rancMgriffn ranch.rpx
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154
Dsgnr: eo
Description...
W/Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, Inc.
Page 1 11
Date: 23 APR 2019
Lfcease : KW-a5Q57288 �u v� Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Retained Height = 3.50 ft
Wall height above soil = 0.17 ft
Slope Behind Wall = 0.00
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Height of Soil over Toe =
2.50 in
=
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Surcharge Loads
_ Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel = 0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Lateral Load =
27.0 #/ft
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
...Height to Top =
...Height to Bottom =
3.67 ft
2.67 ft
Used for Sliding & Overturning
-
Load Type =
Wind (1M
Axial Load Applied to Stem
(Strength Level)
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
(Strength Level)
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Footing Width = 0.00 ft
Eccentricity - 0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist = 0.00 ft
Footing Type Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil _ 0.0 ft
at Back of Wall
Poisson's Ratio = 0.300
Design Summary
Stem Construction
Bottom
Wall Stability Ratios
Design Height Above Ftg ft=
Stem OK
0.00
Overturning
= 29.50 OK
Wall Material Above "Ht"
=
Masonry
Sliding
31.49 OK
Design Method
=
ASD
Thickness
=
8.00
Total Bearing Load =
1,409 Ibs
Rebar Size
=
# 4
resultant ecc. =
1.79 in
Rebar Spacing
=
32.00
Soil Pressure @Toe =
340 psf OK
Rebar Placed at
Design Data
=
Center
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
653 psf OK
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
0.136
Allowable =
1.500 psf
Total Force @ Section
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
462 psf
ce Level
Ibs =
18.7
ACI Factored @ Heel =
888 psf
Strength Level
Ibs =
Footing Shear @Toe =
1.3 psi OK
Moment.... Actual
Footing Shear @ Heel =
7.7 psi OK
Service Level
ft�F =
54.2
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Strength Level
ft-#=
Sliding Calcs
Moment.....Allowable
=
432.2
Lateral Sliding Force =
20.5 Ibs
Shear.... Actual
less 100% Passive Force =
- 97.2 Ibs
Service Level
psi =
0.8
less 100% Friction Force =
- 547.7 Ibs
Strength Level
psi =
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
44.9
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
23.77
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
3.75
Masonry Data -
-
fm
psi=
1,500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf =
55.0
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code
CBC 2016,AC1
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in =
4.90
Dead Load
1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load
1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H
1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W
1.000
t'c
psi =
Seismic, E
1 000
Fy
psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page: 2
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, Inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW06057288
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
0.67 ft
Tog
Heel
Heel Width =
2.17
Factored Pressure
- 462
888 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.84
Mu': Upward
= ill
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
13.50 in
Mu': Downward
- 78
975 ft-#
Mu: Design
- 33
975 ft-#
Key Width =
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.31
7.70 psi
Key Depth =
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
2.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spedd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5'lambda'sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.83 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 A
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING.........RESISTING .....
Force Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item Ibs ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 4.3 1.54
6.6 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 631.4
2.09
1,318.6
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
4.1 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
2.09
1,318.6
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
2.09
Buoyant Force = 1.42
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 4.3 1.54
6.6 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load =
' Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load = 16.2 4.30
69.6 Soil Over Toe = 16.8
0.34
5.6
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 201.9
1.00
202.5
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight = 479.3
1.42
680.5
Total = 20.5 O.T.M. =
80.3 Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =
29.50 Vert. Component =
2.84
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,409.3 Ibs Total = 1,369.3
Ibs R.M.=
2,287.5
' Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure
calculation
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt 1
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.021 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds, that of,thg toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained_seil.
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date. 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, Inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetalnPro tcl 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Cade: CSC 2016,ACI 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
3"
8" vv/ R4@ 32„
#=1@16_in
@ Toe
:94@1S"
cy Heel
44
3"
3 - "u"
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch /� n
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page: 4 G G
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/Site Obs. & Testing by Southwest, Inc.
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
License: KW-0605i Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code_ C8C 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O ,LL=40 , Ec,
27 00ps`
CStrength-Leveli
Pp= 97.22#Z=
20#
a a Hydrostatic Force
Ln x
to
El Lateral earth pressure due to the soil 6ELOt': watertaole
M _
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WfWALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
sense To. OPTION ONE
Criteria
Retained Height =
3.25 ft
Wall height above soil =
0.75 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
2.50 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
E RCantilevered Retaining Wall
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing
= 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure
= 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingilSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Surcharge Loads
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Surcharge Over Heel = 0.0 psf
Lateral Load =
54.0 #/ft
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Height to Top =
4.00 ft
Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0
Height to Bottom =
3.00 ft
Used for Sliding & Overturning
-i
Load Type =
Wind (W)
Axial Load Applied to Stem
(Strength Level)
Axial Dead Load = 0.0 Ibs
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
Axial Live Load = 40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity = 0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning = 9.64 OK
Sliding = 12.43 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,180 Ibs
..resultant ecc. = 0.88 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
398 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
577 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
539 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
780 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
2.0 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.9 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
41.3 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
57.5 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
455.9 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
(Strength Level)
F-Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
tb/FB + fa/Fa
-
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs=
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment..... Allowable
-
Shear ..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data
Bottom
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load -
200.0 Ibs
Footing Width =
0 50 ft
Eccentricity
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base AboveBelow Soil
=
at Back of Wall
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.313
39.8
130.1
432.2
1.7
45.0
23.77
3.75
fm psi= 1,500
Fs psi = 20,000
Solid Grouting = No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS Modular Ratio 'n' = 21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures. W II W ' h -
Load Factors -
Building Code
Dead Load
Live Load
Earth, H
Wind, W
Seismic, E
CBC 2016,AC1
1.200
1.600
1.600
1.000
1.000
a ei9 t
psf- 55.0
_ Short Term Factor
= 1.000
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in = 4.90
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Concrete Data -
fc
psi =
Fy
psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch q "
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 2 t G-"
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WIWALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option 3\e ng in 1 \2300's\231 7-griffi n ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainFro tcj 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057280 Cantilevered Retaining Wall
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-12
'Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width = 0.67 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width = _ 1.75 _
Factored Pressure
= 539
780 psf
Total Footing Width = 2.42
Mu': Upward
= 126
0 ft_#
Footing Thickness = 12.00 in
Mu': Downward
= 71
497 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 55
497 ft-#
Key Width = 12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.97
5.85 psi
Key Depth = 0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe = 2.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
Pc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density = 150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(Pc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.63 in2
Min footing T&S reinfArea per foot 0.26 in2 A
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 9.26 in #4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 14.35 in #5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 20.37 in #6@ 40.74 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING..... RESISTING.....
Force
Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item Ibs
ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft_#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 3.6
1.42
5.1 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 422.5
1.88
793.6
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.2 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
1.88
793.6
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
1.88
Buoyant Force =
1.21
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 3.6
1.42
5.1 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = 77.5
1.88
145.6
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load = 5.3
3.73
19.7 *Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load = 32.4
4.50
145.8 Soil Over Toe = 16.8
0.34
5.6
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 220.0
1.00
220.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight = 363.0
1.21
439.2
Total = 41.3
O.T.M. =
173.8 Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio
=
9.64 Vert. Component =
2.42
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =
1,179.8 Ibs Total = 1,139.8 Ibs
R.M.=
1,685.0
*Axial live load NOT included in total displayed,
or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Tap of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.031 in
The above calculation Is not valid if the heel soil bearing aressure exceeds that of the toe:
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
ALr
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 3
2766 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetalnPra (c)1987-2019, Bulld 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
3"
8" ,,v.+ #4 @ 32„
#4@16 in
Toe
(b Heel
4 -0„
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 4
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
GtainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-12
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O ,LL=40:.. EC
=. COW
(Strength -Level; 11
Pp= 5-7.51#
Idj Ftg Load =2009
Ecc.=O from CL
H'vdrostatic Force
c) cn
i_
x cam ] Lateral eartli pressure due to the soil BELO.,% ,xatertable
r-
cri �n
s
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch ��
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\grif%n ranch.rpx
RetainPro (e) 1987-2019. Build 11.19.03.08 -
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Soil Data
Retained Height =
3.25 ft
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Wall height above soil =
0.ft
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.0000
Height of Soil over Toe =
2.50 in
=
Water height over heel =
0.0 It
Passive Pressure = 250.0 psf/ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
3.88 OK
Sliding =
5.06 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,277 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 1.39 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
680 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
376 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
922 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
509 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
3.6 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.9 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
109.1 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
57.5 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
494.7 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
156.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
4.00 ft
..Height to Bottom =
3.00 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction J
_
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
-
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
=
Total Force @ Section
Service Level Ibs
=
Strength Level Ibs
=
Moment.... Actual
Service Level ft-#=
Strength Level ft-#=
Moment..... Allowable
=
Shear..... Actual
Service Level psi =
Strength Level psi =
Shear..... Allowable psi =
Anet (Masonry) in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd' in =
Masonry Data
Bottom
q
LAdjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load
450.0 Ibs
Footing Width -
0.50 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.850
107.6
362.4
432.2
4.5
45.0
23.77
3.75
fm
psi=
1,500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf =
55.0
Load Factors -
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in =
4.90
Dead Load 1.200
Masonry Block Type
=
Medium Weight
Live Load 1.600
Masonry Design Method
=
ASD
Earth, H 1.600
Concrete Data`
-
Wind, W 1.000
fc
psl=
Seismic, E 1.000
Fy
psl =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 2
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WIWALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch. rpx
RetasnPro tcj 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-0605728B
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To : OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
L Footing Design Results
Toe Width = 0.67 ft
Tog
Heel
Heel Width = 1.75
Factored Pressure
= 922
509 psf
Total Footing Width = 2.42
Mu' : Upward
= 198
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness = 12.00 in
Mu': Downward
= 71
497 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 128
497 ft-#
Key Width = 1
Key Depth = in in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 3.60
5.85 psi
20.00 .00
Key Distance from Toe = .00 ft
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density = 150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As %
= 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00
@ Btm = 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5'lambda'sgrt(fc)'Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.63 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.26 in2 /ft
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 9.26 in #4@ 18.52 in
#5@ 14.35 in #5@ 28.70 in
#6@ 20.37 in #6@ 40.74 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....CVERTURNING..... ....RESISTING.....
Force Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item
Ibs ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
3.6 1.42
5.1 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 422.5
1.88
793.6
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.2 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
1.88
793.6
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
1.88
Buoyant Force =
1.21
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
3.6 1.42
5.1 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = 174.4
1.88
327.6
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load =
11.9 3.73
44.4 "Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load =
93.6 4.50
421.2 Soil Over Toe = 16.8
0.34
5.6
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
-
Stem Weight(s) = 220.0
1.00
220.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Total =
109.1 O.T.M. =
Footing Weight = 363.0
473.9
1.21
439.2
Key Weight =
2.50
Res isting/Overturning Ratio =
3.88 Vert. Component =
2.42
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,276.7 Ibs Total = 1,236.7 Ibs
R.M.=
1,867.1
"Axial live load NOT included in total displayed,
or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.031 in
The_abpve calculation Is not valid if the heel soil bearing pressure exceeds that of the toe.
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch l I
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WMALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
3'
#4@16_in
@ Toe
t4 w18..
@ Heel
4'-0"
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 30
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 149 Page: 4
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WMALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
rtnravIrry lul Ivor-cvio, ovuu a l.-w.va.vo
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O .LL=40 t . Ecc=O
156. 00p sf
(Strength -Level;
Pp= 5:7.51: r—
�dj Ftg Load =450;
Ecc.=O from CL
i
109t
Q a Hydrostatic Force
-M CV
�i r
r., ❑ Lateral earth pressure due to tl7e soil BELL':,, vvatert3ble
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 31
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WMALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: lloption3lengin112300'sX2317-griffin rancMgriffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 19B7.2019, Build 11.19,03.08
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Soil Data
Retained Height =
3.17 It
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Wall height above soil =
0.75 ft
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure - 0.4 psf/ft
=
Slope Behind Wall
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
5.50 in
=
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Passive Pressure = 250.0 psf/ft
N
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem I
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
r
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
6.28 OK
Sliding -
13.32 OK
Total Bearing Load = 947 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 0.06 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
466 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
481 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than
Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
625 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
644 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
1.6 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
3.2 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
41.4 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
188.4 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
362.8 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Density, Heel
= 120 00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingllSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
54.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.92 ft
...Height to Bottom =
2.92 It
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
I_
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-# =
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment ....Allowable
=
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load -
200.0 ibs
Footing Width -
0.50 ft
Eccentricity -
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist -
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Bottom
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
48.00
Center
0.4as
39.7
126.9
292.1
2.5
44.9
15.65
3.75
fm
psi = 1.500
Fs
psi = 20,000
Solid Grouting
- No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS Modular Ratio 'n'
- 21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Load Factors - --
Building Code
Dead Load
Live Load
Earth, H
Wind, W
Seismic, E
CBC 2016,ACI
1.200
1.600
1.600
1.000
1.000
Wya II Wei
g ps
Short Term Factor - 1.000
Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 4.60
Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight
Masonry Design Method = ASD
Concrete Data - - - -
f c psi =
Fy psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 2 h
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WfWALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
Retain Pro (c) 1987-2019, BuiId 11.19A3.0B
License: KW-06057288
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
0.67 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width =
1.33
Factored Pressure
= 625
644 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.00
Mu': Upward
= 141
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness -
13.50 in
Mu': Downward
= 90
218 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 51
218 ft-#
Key Width =
Key Depth =
1
.00 in in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.64
3.17 psi
Key Distance from Toe -
20.00
2.00 ft
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spedd
Min. As %
= 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00
@ Btm: 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda`sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.58 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 A
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING.....MRESISTING.....
Force Distance
oment Force
Distance
Moment
Item
Ibs ft
ft_# Ibs
ft
ft_#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
3.7 1.43
5.3 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 252.3
1.67
421.0
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.3 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
1.67
421.0
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
1.67
Buoyant Force =
1.00
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
3.7 1.43
5.3 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = 48.2
1.67
80.3
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load =
5.3 3.78
20.0 "Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load =
32.4 4.55
147.3 Soil Over Toe = 36.9
0.34
12.3
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 192.1
1.00
192.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Total =
41.4 O.T.M. =
Footing Weight = 337.5
175.8
1.00
337.5
Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio
=
6.28 Vert. Component =
2.00
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 946.9 Ibs Total = 906.9 Ibs
R.M.=
1,124.1
*Axial live load NOT included in total displayed,
or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculatron.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
L Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
The ab ovecaicuIatic n is not valid it th e hee I so iI be arin r sure exceeds that -of th to
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch Z 7J
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 3 `J
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
8,. ,n? 04@ 48.,
6'1
in
Cs, L; Toe
@ Heel
2- i
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch ��
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 4
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WIWALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPra Ici 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Cade: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O .LL=40# . Ecc
54. 00 psf
hwEl
Pp= 188.37#,=
Adj Ftg Load =200--
Ecc =0" from CL
41#
Hydrostatic Force
c to
ti-.1
CC. Lateral earth Pressure due to the sail BELOV..' 2ter table
r -a
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 1 39
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
ReteinPre (C) 1937-2019, guild 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Soil Data
-
Retained Height =
3.17 ft
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
r,
Wall height above soil =
0.75 ft
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
h
Active Heel Pressure - 0.4 psf/ft
=
Slope Behind Wall
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
5.50 in
=
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Passive Pressure = 250.0 psf/ft
H
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
_Axial Load Applied to Stem
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
3.13 OK
Sliding -
6.71 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,007 Ibs
...resultant ecc. - 1.91 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
744 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
263 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than
Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
1,001 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
353 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
2.9 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
3.2 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
85.8 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
188.4 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
386.8 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Density, Heel = 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe = 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction = 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure = 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
156.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.92 ft
...Height to Bottom =
3.17 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
45J,0 It s
Footing Width =
0.50 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Stem Construction
Bottom
Design Height Above Ftg
ft =
Stem OK
0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"
=
Masonry
Design Method
=
ASD
Thickness
=
8.00
Rebar Size
=
# 4
Rebar Spacing
=
48.00
Rebar Placed at
-
Center
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
0.978
Total Force @ Section
Service Level Ibs =
84.1
Strength Level Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level ft-=
282.5
Strength Level ft-#=
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Load Factors
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Dead Load
1.200
Live Load
1.600
Earth, H
1.600
Wind, W
1.000
Seismic, E
1.000
Moment..... Allowable 292.1
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
Strength Level
Shear.. ..Allowable
Anet (Masonry)
Rebar Depth 'd'
Masonry Data
fm
Fs
Solid Grouting
Modular Ratio 'n'
Wall Weight
Short Term Factor
Equiv. Solid Thick.
Masonry Block Type
Masonry Design Method
Concrete Data
fc
Fy
psi = 5.3
psi =
psi = 44.9
in2 = 15.85
in = 3.75
psf = 1,500
psi = 20,000
No
21.48
psf = 49.0
= 1.000
in = 4.60
= Medium Weight
= ASD
psi =
psi=
r I F
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 2
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 2 �7(�
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
0.67 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width =
_ 1.33
Factored Pressure
= 1,001
353 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.00
Mu': Upward
= 208
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
13.50 in
Mu': Downward
= 90
218 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 118
218 ft-#
Key Width =
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 2.92
3.17 psi
Key Depth =
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
2 00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm.= 3.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5'lambda'sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.58 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 A
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal
bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
L Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING.........RESISTING .....
Force
Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item
Ibs
ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
3.7
1.43
5.3 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 252.3
1.67
421.0
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.3 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
1.67
421.0
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
1.67
Buoyant Force =
1.00
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
3.7
1.43
5.3 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = 108.3
1.67
180.8
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load =
11.9
3.78
44.9 ' Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load =
70.2
4.67
327.8 Soil Over Toe = 36.9
0.34
12.3
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 192.1
1.00
192.7
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight = 337.5
1.00
337.5
Total =
85.8
O.T.M. =
381.3 Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio
=
3.13 Vert. Component =
2.00
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =
1,007.1 Ibs Total = 967.1
Ibs R.M.=
1,224.6
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure
calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
L Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
e above calculation is not valid If the heel soil bearin❑ pressure exceeds that of the toe,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch ��
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WIWALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
F7eta1nPro tcj 1987-2019, B u M I I.19.03.08
Llcense: l{W46057288 Cantilevered Retaining WBII Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,ACI 530-12
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
G"
o",,v 10_48..
#4 c@' }rt 1G.in
L To e
#4o18"
@ Heal
4
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 0
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 151 Page: 4 130
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description.—
W1WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option 3\engin 1 \2300's\231 7-g riffin ranch\griffin rancli.rpx
Reta In Pro (c) 1987.2019. Build 11,19,03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=0 LL=40--,
16 0opsf
(St rength-Le,el19M
Pp. 188 37'
Adj Ftg Load =450--
Ecc =0" from CL
Ecc=O"
a6r
Hydrostatic Farce
Lateral earth pressure due to the soil BELOIA[ v;ater table
r-- cv
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch ��
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \loption3\enginl\2300's12317-griffin ranchlgriffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.09
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Retained Height =
3.08 ft
Wall height above soil =
0.08 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
1.00 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem II
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
1
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning -
14.91 OK
Sliding =
13.70 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,278 Ibs
...resultant ecc. 2.54 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
247 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
631 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
335 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
856 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
1.5 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.3 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
41.3 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
70.3 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
495.4 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing
= 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure
= 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
- 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
54.0 #/ft
Height to Top =
3.17 ft
Height to Bottom =
2.17 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
=
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment..... Allowable
-
Shear ..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear. ...Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
Masonry Data
Bottom
[Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load -
200.0 Ibs
Footing Width =
0.50 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
=
at Back of Wall
0 0 ft
Poisson's Ratio -
0.300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.245
39.6
102.0
432.2
1.7
44.7
23.77
3.75
I'm
psi =
1,500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation
of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf =
55.0
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in =
4.90
Dead Load
1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load
1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H
1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W
1.000
fc
psi=
Seismic, E
1.000
Fy
psi =
I
I Q AJ, L a!'f' A. -
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 40
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 2
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option 3\eng in 1 \2300's\231 7-g riffi n ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987.2019, 8ufld 11.19.03.08
License: KW-0805728E Cantilevered Retaining Wall
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
1.08 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width =
1.83 _
Factored Pressure
= 335
856 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.91
Mu': Upward
= 233
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
14.00 in
Mu': Downward
= 169
569 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 64
569 ft-#
Key Width =
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.54
5.28 psi
Key Depth =
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
2.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot
If one layer of horizontal bars:
#4@ 7.94 in
#5@ 12.30 in
#6@ 17.46 in
0.88 in2
0.30 in2 ift
If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 15.87 in
#5@ 24.60 in
#6@ 34.92 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING.....
.....RESISTING.....
Force
Distance
Moment
Force
Distance
Moment
Item Ibs
ft
ft-#
ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 3.6
1.42
5.1
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
430.0
2.33
1,001.1
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.2
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
2.33
1,001.1
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
2.33
Buoyant Force =
1.46
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 3.6
1.42
5.1
Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
74.6
2.33
173.6
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
40.0
1.41
56.5
Adjacent Footing Load = 5.3
3.73
19.7
*Axial Live Load on Stem =
40.0
1.41
56.5
Added Lateral Load = 32.4
3.84
124.3
Soil Over Toe =
10,8
0.54
5.8
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
_
Stem Weight(s) =
173.8
1.41
245.6
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight =
509.3
1.46
741.0
Total = 41.3
O.T.M. =
152.3
Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio
=
14.91
Vert. Component =
2.91
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure =
1,278.4 Ibs
Total =
1,238.4 Ibs
R.M.=
2,280.2
' Axial live load NOT included in
total displayed,
or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt I
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearingpressure exceeds that of the ice,
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil,
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 3 41
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (G) 1987.2019, Build 11. 9M.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Cade: CI3C 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
@ Toe
Heel
3"
3 -2-'
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch ��
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 4
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WMALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin
neiamrro tc) iaui-[uia, tsuna 11.1a.us.uo
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
D L=0 .LL=409
54.00psf
(Stre n gth- Lave I ;®
Pp= 70.31#
Adj Ftg Load =200#
Err_,=0'fr,,m CL
41=
w
a ■ Hydrostatic Force
�n r--
N
M Lateral Earth pressure due to the soil BEL0,JV water table
- Lk)- - f i
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch-rpx
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
WIWALL LOAD 6.5 FT
Page: 1
Date: 23 APR 2019
License �K,WZe0's iai I - - - - ' '''--..._- Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
I Soil Data
Retained Height =
3.08 ft
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psfpw
Wall height above soil =
0.08 ft
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
y'
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
1.00 in
=
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Passive Pressure = 250.0 psf/ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning =
5.97 OK
Sliding =
5.53 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,372 Ibs
...resultant ecc. - 0.81 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
405 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
537 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
551 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
730 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
2.7 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
5.3 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Caics
Lateral Sliding Force =
109.1 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
70.3 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
532.6 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
156.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.17 ft
...Height to Bottom =
2.17 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
Design Height Above Ftg
ft =
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
=
Rebar Size
=
Reber Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
=
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
=
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment..... Allowable
=
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
Strength Level
psi =
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
Rebar Depth 'd'
In =
Masonry Data
Bottom
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
450.0 Ibs
Footing Width =
0.50 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist -
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio -
0.300
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.662
107.4
282.3
4322
4.5
44.7
23.77
3.75
fm
psi= 1,500
Fs
psi = 20,000
Solid Grouting
= No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
- 21.48
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf = 55.0
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
- 1.000
Building Code CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick.
in = 4.90
Dead Load 1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load 1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H 1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W 1.000
fc
psi =
Seismic, E 1.000
Fy
psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch d
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 2 -1 q-
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.fpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: Kw.06057280
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To.- OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
1.08 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width =
1.83
Factored Pressure
- 551
730 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.91
Mu': Upward
= 334
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
14.00 in
Mu': Downward
= 169
569 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 165
569 ft-#
Key Width =
1in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 2.69
5.28 psi
Key Depth =
.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
20.00
.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spedd
Min. As %
= 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00
@ Btm = 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi`5`lambda*sgrt(fc)'Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.88 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.30 in2 rft
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal
bars:
#4@ 7.94 in #4@ 15.87 in
#5@ 12.30 in #5@ 24.60 in
#6@ 17.46 in #6@ 34.92 in
j Summary, of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING .....
Force Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item
lbs ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl)
3.6 1.42
5.1 Soil Over HL (ab. water IN) 430.0
2.33
1,001.1
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
3.2 Soil Over HL (bel. water IN)
2.33
1,001,1
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
2.33
Buoyant Force =
1.46
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
3.6 1.42
5.1 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load = 167.8
2.33
390.7
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.41
56.5
Adjacent Footing Load =
11.9 3.73
44.3 *Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.41
56.5
Added Lateral Load =
93.6 3.84
359.1 Soil Over Toe = 10.8
0.54
5.8
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 173.8
1.41
245.6
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Total =
109.1 O.T.M. =
Footing Weight = 509.3
411.7
1.46
741.0
Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =
5.97 Vert. Component =
2.91
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,371.6 Ibs Total = 1,331.6
Ibs R.M.=
2.497.3
' Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure
calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
L Tilt
Horiza_ntal_Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Deft @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil be rin resVie exceeds t�iat of the too.
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
r
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch 'I
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page: 3
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
etainPro (c) 1987.2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-09057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
I"
@ Toe
#4@18"
@ Heel
3"
3 2"
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch j
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 152 Page : 4 lU
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
License : KW-06057288Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
DL=O .LL=4O#
(:Strength -Level
Pp= 70.31#
.dj Ftg Load =450�;
Ecr_.=0" from CL
109#
w
H%drostatic Force
v c�
o Lateral earth pressure due to the soil BELO'.rtrwater taole
-r �n
I
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page: 1
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
WfWALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.Fpx
Retd nNO (C) 1987-2019, 5 u i (d 11.19.03.0$
Llcens e.KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Retained Height =
3.50 ft
Wall height above soil =
0.17 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
2.50 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem I
Axial Dead Load =
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning -
15.42 OK
Sliding =
17.58 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,409 Ibs
...resultant ecc. = 1.20 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
392 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
601 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
533 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
817 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe -
1.6 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
7.7 psi OK
Allowable -
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
36.7 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force =
97.2 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force =
547.7 Ibs
Added Force Req'd -
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
j Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
54.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.67 ft
...Height to Bottom =
2.67 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Stem Construction
_
Design Height Above Ftg
ft=
Wall Material Above "Ht"
_
Design Method
=
Thickness
-
Rebar Size
=
Rebar Spacing
=
Rebar Placed at
-
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs=
Strength Level
Ibs=
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#
Strength Level
ft-# _
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
considered in the calculation of soil bearing pressures.
Load Factors
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Dead Load
1.200
Live Load
1 600
Earth, H
1.600
Wind, W
1.000
Seismic, E
1.000
Moment ..... Allowable
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
Strength Level
Shear..... Allowable
Anet (Masonry)
Rebar Depth 'd'
Masonry Data -
fm
Fs
Solid Grouting
Modular Ratio 'n'
Wall Weight
Short Term Factor
Equiv. Solid Thick.
Masonry Block Type
Masonry Design Method
Concrete Data
fc
Fy
Bottom
Stem OK
0.00
Masonry
ASD
8.00
# 4
32.00
Center
0.255
34.9
105.6
432.2
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
200.0 Ibs
Footing Width =
0.00 ft
Eccentricity
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
psi=
1.5
psi =
psi =
44.9
M2 =
23.77
in =
3.75
psi =
1,500
psi =
20,000
=
No
=
21.48
psf =
55.0
=
1.000
in =
4.90
= Medium Weight
= ASD
psi =
psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch /�j
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page : 2 -`-`
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD & FENCE
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
Retain Pro (c) 19B7-2018, 8Wd 11.19M.08
License : KW-06057288
Cantilevered Retaining Wall
Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
L Footing Design Results
Toe Width =
0.67 ft
Toe
Heel
Heel Width =
2.17
Factored Pressure
= 533
817 psf
Total Footing Width =
2.84
Mu': Upward
= 125
0 ft-#
Footing Thickness =
13.50 in
Mu': Downward
= 78
975 ft-#
Mu: Design
= 46
975 ft-#
Key Width =
12.00 in
Actual 1-Way Shear
= 1.57
7.70 psi
Key Depth =
0.00 in
Allow 1-Way Shear
= 40.00
40.00 psi
Key Distance from Toe =
2.00 ft
Toe Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 15.99 in
fc = 2,500 psi Fy =
60,000 psi
Heel Reinforcing
= # 4 @ 17.99 in
Footing Concrete Density =
150.00 pcf
Key Reinforcing
= None Spec'd
Min. As % = 0.0018
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm = 3.00 in
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi*5*lambda*sgrt(fc)*Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinfArea 0.83 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 /it
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting
Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING.........RESISTING .....
Force Distance
Moment Force
Distance
Moment
Item Ibs ft
ft-# Ibs
ft
ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 4.3 1.54
6.6 Soil Over HL (ab, water tbl) 631.4
2.09
1,318.6
HL Act Pres (be water tbl)
4.1 Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
2.09
1,318.6
Hydrostatic Force
Watre Table
2.09
Buoyant Force = 1.42
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 4.3 1.54
6.6 Surcharge Over Heel =
Surcharge over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Surcharge Over Toe =
Axial Dead Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Adjacent Footing Load =
* Axial Live Load on Stem = 40.0
1.00
40.1
Added Lateral Load = 32.4 430
139.2 Soil Over Toe = 16.8
0.34
5.6
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Surcharge Over Toe =
=
Stem Weight(s) = 201.9
1.00
202.5
Earth @ Stem Transitions=
Total = 36.7 O.T.M.
Footing Weight = 479.3
= 149.8
1.42
680.5
Key Weight =
2.50
Resisting/Overturning Ratio =
15.42 Vert. Component =
2.84
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,409.3
Ibs Total = 1,369.3 Ibs
R.M.=
2,287.5
* Axial live load NOT included in total displayed,
or used for
overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci
Horizontal Defl @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.041 in
The above calculation is not valid if the h_ael Soil hear no ore�sure exceeds that of the toe.
because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil.
---A-
1 4
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
WfWALL LOAD & FENCE
Page: 3 4 r
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: lloption3lengin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranc.Mgriffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (0) 1987.201U. Buiid 11.19.03.08
License:KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To. OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
3"
8,. yr;. #4C 32"
#4@16 in
@ Toe
(Z Heel
3"
3 -°u'
I 1 I
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
WMALL LOAD & FENCE
Page: 4
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
Retain Pro cj 198 7-2 0 19, B u i d 11.1S.03.08
License. KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
GAL=i i .LL=40# , Ec1
54.00psf
(Stre n gth-Le vie I.,®
Pp= 97.22:TZ=
.Adj Ftg Load =200ir
Ecc.=O `from CL
37#
N ■
yd
Hi..rostatic Force
cop
Lateral earth pressure due to the sail BELOiA., water table
1 n
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154
Dsgnr: eo
Description.,..
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
Page: 1 �0
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin raFLCli.rpx
RetalnPro tc 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License: KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1 530-13
License To : OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Criteria
Retained Height =
3.50 ft
Wall height above soil =
0.17 ft
Slope Behind Wall =
0.00
Height of Soil over Toe =
2.50 in
Water height over heel =
0.0 ft
Surcharge Loads
Surcharge Over Heel =
0.0 psf
Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning
Surcharge Over Toe =
0.0
Used for Sliding & Overturning
Axial Load Applied to Stem 1
Axial Dead Load
0.0 Ibs
Axial Live Load =
40.0 Ibs
Axial Load Eccentricity =
0.0 in
Design Summary
Wall Stability Ratios
Overturning -
5.50 OK
Sliding =
6.59 OK
Total Bearing Load = 1,409 Ibs
...resultant ecc. - 1.04 in
Soil Pressure @ Toe =
587 psf OK
Soil Pressure @ Heel =
405 psf OK
Allowable =
1,500 psf
Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable
ACI Factored @ Toe =
799 psf
ACI Factored @ Heel =
551 psf
Footing Shear @ Toe =
2.6 psi OK
Footing Shear @ Heel =
7.7 psi OK
Allowable =
75.0 psi
Sliding Calcs
Lateral Sliding Force =
97.9 Ibs
less 100% Passive Force = -
97.2 Ibs
less 100% Friction Force = -
547.7 Ibs
Added Force Req'd =
0.0 Ibs OK
....for 1.5 Stability =
0.0 Ibs OK
Soil Data
Allow Soil Bearing = 1,500.0 psf
Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method
Active Heel Pressure = 0.4 psf/ft
Passive Pressure
= 250.0 psf/ft
Soil Density, Heel
= 120.00 pcf
Soil Density, Toe
= 120.00 pcf
FootingIlSoil Friction
= 0.400
Soil height to ignore
for passive pressure
= 12.00 in
Lateral Load Applied to Stem
Lateral Load =
156.0 #/ft
...Height to Top =
3.67 ft
...Height to Bottom =
2.67 ft
Load Type =
Wind (W)
(Strength Level)
Wind on Exposed Stem =
0.0 psf
(Strength Level)
Adjacent Footing Load
Adjacent Footing Load =
450.0 Ibs
Footing Width =
0.00 ft
Eccentricity =
0.00 in
Wall to Ftg CL Dist =
0.25 ft
Footing Type
Line Load
Base Above/Below Soil
at Back of Wall =
0.0 ft
Poisson's Ratio =
0.300
Stem Construction
Bottom
-
Stem OK
Design Height Above Ftg
ft =
0.00
Wall Material Above "Ht"
=
Masonry
Design Method
-
ASD
Thickness
=
8.00
Rebar Size
=
# 4
Rebar Spacing
=
32.00
Rebar Placed at
-
Center
Design Data
fb/FB + fa/Fa
-
0.704
Total Force @ Section
Service Level
Ibs =
96.1
Strength Level
Ibs =
Moment.... Actual
Service Level
ft-#=
299.6
Strength Level
ft-# =
Moment..... Allowable
-
432.2
Shear..... Actual
Service Level
psi =
4.0
Strength Level
psi =
Shear..... Allowable
psi =
44.9
Anet (Masonry)
in2 =
23.77
Rebar Depth 'd'
in =
3.75
Masonry Data
fm
psi=
1,500
Fs
psi =
20,000
Solid Grouting
=
No
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS
Modular Ratio 'n'
=
21.48
considered in the calculation
of soil bearing pressures.
Wall Weight
psf =
55.0
Load Factors
Short Term Factor
=
1.000
Building Code
CBC 2016,ACI
Equiv. Solid Thick_
in =
4.90
Dead Load
1.200
Masonry Block Type
= Medium Weight
Live Load
1.600
Masonry Design Method
= ASD
Earth, H
1.600
Concrete Data
Wind, W
1.000
fc
psi =
Seismic, E
1.000
Fy
psi =
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page: 2
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3lengin1\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
RetainPro (c) 1987-2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License : Kw-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,ACI 318-14,AC1 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
Footing Dimensions & Strengths
Toe Width
= 0.67 ft
Heel Width
= 2.17
Total Footing Width
_
= 2.84
Footing Thickness
= 13.50 in
Key Width
= 12.00 in
Key Depth
= 0.00 in
Key Distance from Toe
= 2.00 ft
fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi
Footing Concrete Density
= 150.00 pcf
Min. As %
= 0.0018
Cover @ Top 2.00
@ Btm = 3.00 in
Footing Design Results
Toe
Heel
Factored Pressure - 799
551 psf
Mu': Upward = 175
0 ft-#
Mu': Downward = 78
975 ft-#
Mu: Design = 97
975 ft-#
Actual 1-Way Shear = 2.56
7.70 psi
Allow 1-Way Shear = 40.00
40.00 psi
Toe Reinforcing = # 4 @ 15.99 in
Heel Reinforcing = # 4 @ 17.99 in
Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd
Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings
Toe: Not req'd: Mu < phi`5'lambda'sgrt(fc)`Sm
Heel: Not req'd: Mu < phi"5"lambda"sgrt(fc)`Sm
Key: No key defined
Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.83 in2
Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.29 in2 ift
If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars:
#4@ 8.23 in #4@ 16.46 in
#5@ 12.76 in #5@ 25.51 in
#6@ 18.11 in #6@ 36.21 in
Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments
.....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING.....
Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment
Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs ft ft-#
HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 4.3 1.54 6.6
HL Act Pres (be water tbl) 4.1
Hydrostatic Force
Buoyant Force = 1.42
Sloped Soil Over Heel = 4.3 1.54 6.6
Surcharge over Heel =
Surcharge Over Toe =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Added Lateral Load = 93.6 4.30 402.0
Load @ Stem Above Soil =
Total = 97.9 O.T.M. = 412.7
Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 5.60
Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,409.3 Ibs
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Sliding Resistance.
Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS considered in the
calculation of Overturning Resistance.
Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl)
631.4
2.09
1,318.6
Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl)
2.09
1,318.6
Watre Table
2.09
Sloped Soil Over Heel =
Surcharge Over Heel =
Adjacent Footing Load =
Axial Dead Load on Stem =
40.0
1.00
40.1
Axial Live Load on Stem =
40.0
1.00
40.1
Soil Over Toe =
16.8
0.34
5.6
Surcharge Over Toe =
Stem Weight(s) =
201.9
1 00
202.5
Earth @ Stem Transitions =
Footing Weight =
479.3
1.42
680.5
Key Weight =
2.50
Vert. Component =
2.84
Total =
1,369.3 Ibs
R.M.=
2,287.5
'Axial live load NOT included in
total displayea,
or used for overturning
resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation.
Tilt
Horizontal Deflection at Top of Wall due to settlement of soil
(Deflection due to wall bending not considered)
Soil Spring Reaction Modulus
250.0 pci
Horizontal Deft @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.021 in
The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing ressure exceeds that of the toe
because the wall would then tend to rotate Into the retained_sai[_
Option One Consulating Engineers
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Project Name/Number : griffin ranch
Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154
Dsgnr: eo
Description....
W/WALL LOAD 6.5 FT
Page: 3 ��
Date: 23 APR 2019
This Wall in File: \\option3\enginl\2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
Retain ro ej 1987-2619, Build 11.19.03.08
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Code: CBC 2016,AC1318-14,AC1530-13
License To. OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
3" —
#. 3
718 in
C Toe
r=3 C 18"
C Heel
3„
-tl i .... fh q -, - - W- -
3 4'
Project Name/Number: griffin ranch
Option One Consulating Engineers Title Griffin Ranch Lot 154 Page • 4
2765 Bristol Street, Suite 100 Dsgnr: eo Date: 23 APR 2019
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Description.... T�
WlWALL LOAD 6.5 FT
This Wall in File: \\option3\engin 1 \2300's\2317-griffin ranch\griffin ranch.rpx
etainPro (c) 1967.2019, Build 11.19.03.08
License : KW-06057288 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Cade: CBC 2016,ACi 318-14,ACI 530-13
License To: OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEER
GL=II .LL=-run . ECr—^
I' .65'.OcIpsf
Strength-Le•:el;®
Pp= 97.22,r,:f=
Adj Ftg Load =450#
Ecc.=O"from CL
i
98r-
u a Wdr0statir_ Force
r�
Lateral earth pressure due to the sail BELOW!. watertable
it =r
:option
�fne
PAGE 1 OF 2
5PECIFIC 51TE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #3
PROJECT
"GrlfFln Ranch"
OFT.1 J.N.
0119.2317
LOCATION
Griffin Ranch Community
CLIENT J.N.
n/a
La Quanta, CA
CODE
C13C 2016 (design)
CLIENT
Lennar Homes -Inland Division
SITE
nla
CONTACT
Shelly Jordan, Project Manager
CELL
(951) 258-8688
SUDJECT
Structural Review of Existing Site Walls for Lots 150 and 153
EMAIL
ehelly rdan41annar.com
DATE
September 9, 2019
PRINCIPAL
Illa Sarad, P.E., S.E., 5.E.C.13.
EMAIL
Iliao@option-1.com
PROJECTENG.
Enrique Ore, P.E.
EMAIL
enriotueogo ion-1.com
INTRODUCTION
Lennar Homes has requested Option One Consulting Engineers to express their professional opinion
regarding structural adequacy of as-bullt site walls for lots 150 and 153.
PROJECT LOCATION and DESCRIPTION
The site CMU walls are part of the Griffin Ranch Community and are located around the Recreation
n W Fr OQ_0041 tentlon area. Site walls are built by 6" CMU blocks for the retaining sectlon of the wall and In some
D G ses 6" CMU blocks for fence with Iron fencing above.
6$� 6`l,1Dr 110� lit ONCLUSION
Data collected from site walls adjacent to lots 149 and 154, was deemed "sufficient" by calculations for
their corresponding site conditions. Therefore, it is the opinion of Option One Consulting Engineers that
if all design assumptions for site walls at lots 149 and 154 (per "specific site review memorandum #2,
dated May 2, 2019) are presumed to be, applicable for lots 150 and 153. then, we would conclude these
site walls to be. "sufficient" as well for aforementioned lots.
NOTES and LIMITATIONS
Our opinion for existing site walls at lots 150, and 156, is based on the following:
• 13y observations and overall assessment of the site CMU walls specific to lots 149, and 154, as listed on
"SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUMS #1 and #2" by Option One Consulting Engineers, dated January
29, 2019 and May 2, 2019 respectively.
• Site information were provided by the developer.
Our service has been performed within the prescribed limits in a manner consistent with that level of
skill and care ordinarily exercised by other professional consultants under similar circumstances.
The Information presented in this letter is considered valid as of this date. As new and/or amended
Information becomes available, we reserve the right to revise and resubmit as necessary.
SC This letter only provides an additional technical support service for Client to further evaluate any of JPt�_1-PfG remedial actions necessary for review with EOR. This letter represents our opinion In solving the as -built
�
field condition and/or achieve the builder's request.
►� I1fIP.�"L �10J
V If you should have any questions and need additional clarification on items listed above, please do not
Pulri- 3 3 hesitate to contact our office at (714) 556-1916.
4 �pFf 55I0
Submitted by:
OPTION ONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
This document must bear an original "WET' Signature and seal for all submittal purposes. y
Enrique Ore, P.E.
Project Engineer
Distribution: Shelly Jordan
Principal
o; NO. S 3855
bj� �e* Exp. 3/31/2020
E., 0.E., 51 E.C.13. ��9T� RUCT �cC
September9, 2019
STAMP OF ENGINEER -OF -RECORD
23176EM03 5iuwnllexl-
Option One
Consulting Engineers
Tel 714.556.1916
2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100, Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Cy 11 Fax 714.556.1952
�ption
-:'ne
SPECIFIC SITE REVIEW MEMORANDUM #3
September 9. 2019
SITE PLAN.
PAGE 2 OF 2
137•
Ey,,4-jjiT roll PROPOSED LOI UNE. 40JU5IVL415
SA CbNsumw, 1Nr-
r- 'Y'
-bW
139 140 1
141 142 1 143 144
L
55 RECREATION
RETENTION
'AU'
LOT
154 1 2
153 5
157
0 w
151
163 164
158
150
145
159 162 165
k I
149 146
5 160 I166
j
148 1
147
-A:
Homesites around Recreation Retention area (image provide by Shelly Jordan)
2317MEW03�_51ra
Option One Tel 714.556.1916
Consulting Engineers 2755 Bristol Street, Suite 100. Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Fax 714.556.1952