Loading...
2019 11 12 PCPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1 NOVEMBER 12, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2019 AT 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Commissioners Bettencourt, Currie, Libolt Varner, McCune, Nieto, Proctor and Chairperson Caldwell PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. The Planning Commission values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by GC 54954.2(b). CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 22, 2019 BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 26 AND DECEMBER 24, 2019 STUDY SESSION - None Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are now available on the City’s web page: www.laquintaca.gov PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 NOVEMBER 12, 2019 PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed “Request to Speak” form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. Declarations regarding Public Contacts. 1. SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-0002, VARIANCE 2019-0001 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0002 SUBMITTED BY KAIDENCE GROUP PROPOSING A 2,790 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS. PROJECT: DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS; CEQA: PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPROVED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91-187 PREPARED FOR PLOT PLAN 91-456, APPROVED APRIL 16, 1991. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. [RESOLUTION 2019-011] REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS STAFF ITEMS - None ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on November 26, 2019, commencing at 6:00 p.m. with the Call to Order, at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Wanda Wise-Latta, Commission Secretary, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting of November 12, 2019 was posted on the City’s website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at the Stater Brothers Supermarket at 78-630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on November 7, 2019. DATED: November 7, 2019 WANDA WISE-LATTA, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 NOVEMBER 12, 2019 Public Notices The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the Planning Division of the Design and Development Department at 777-7118, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Commission, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the Planning Division of the Design and Development Department at 777-7118. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Executive Assistant for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Design and Development Department’s counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 OCTOBER 22, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2019 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairperson Caldwell. PRESENT: Commissioners Bettencourt, Currie, Libolt Varner, McCune, Nieto, and Chairperson Caldwell ABSENT: Commissioner Proctor STAFF PRESENT: Acting Assistant City Attorney Thai Phan, Design and Development Director Danny Castro, Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores, Senior Planner Carlos Flores, Commission Secretary Wanda Wise-Latta and Administrative Assistant Mirta Lerma PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Bettencourt led the Planning Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA – None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DATED OCTOBER 8, 2019 MOTION – A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Nieto to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted. AYES: Commissioners Bettencourt, Currie, Libolt Varner, McCune, Nieto and Chairperson Caldwell. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Proctor. ABSTAIN: None. Motion passed. BUSINESS SESSION - None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 OCTOBER 22, 2019 STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO MINIMUM LOT SIZES, FLAGPOLES, SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS, AND GARAGE REQUIREMENTS Senior Planner Flores presented the staff report, which is on file in the Design and Development Department and noted that on page two of the staff report, paragraph one, second sentence it states, “west of Madison” and should be corrected to read “west of Monroe”. Staff responded to Commission inquiries about Minimum lot size standards (Section 9.50.030 Table of development standards) regarding notification to interested parties who previously requested subdivision of land in the area referenced in the staff report; Equestrian Overlay Zone; equestrian uses and animal keeping; reduction of lot size and impact on density; decreased lot size and potential density impacts on infrastructure; General Plan and buildout analysis; increased density and trip generation; and transitional neighborhoods. Staff stated that the amendments being proposed will not change the density and confirmed that zoning controls density. Senior Planner Flores continued with the presentation of the staff report and responded to Commission inquiry about standards for Flagpoles (Section 9.60.340 Flagpoles) regarding flagpole height and placement on residential lots. Senior Planner Flores continued with the presentation of the staff report and responded to Commission inquiries about CR Specific Plans (Section 9.70.030 CR Regional Commercial District) regarding regulatory reviews and analysis when Specific Plan is not required; and interconnectivity between parcels to ensure pedestrian and vehicular movement. Senior Planner Flores continued with the presentation of the staff report and responded to Commission inquiries about nonconforming garage standards (Section 9.270.030 Nonconforming uses) regarding short-term vacation rental compliance with parking requirements. Planning Commissioner Bettencourt requested to be excused at 7:06 p.m. due to another commitment and left the dais. PUBLIC HEARING - None REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 OCTOBER 22, 2019 COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS Commissioner McCune asked that the topic of recreational and large vehicle parking in residential areas be agendized for a future Commission meeting and asked if it was possible to have a representative from Code Compliance present for the meeting. Commission concurred. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Dale Tyerman, La Quinta – with reference to Study Session Item No. 1 and minimum lot size standards, spoke about density and lot size. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Elisa Guerrero, La Quinta – with reference to Study Session Item No. 1, inquired if applications have been received for the areas referenced in the staff report where Residential Low-Density subdivisions are allowed or in the Highway 111 Corridor where staff is proposing to remove the Specific Plan requirement. Staff responded none had been received. STAFF ITEMS -None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners McCune/Currie to adjourn this meeting at 7:09 p.m. Motion passed. Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California 7 8 City of La Quinta PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: November 12, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 26 AND DECEMBER 24, 2019 RECOMMENDATION Approve cancelling the regular Planning Commission meetings of November 26 and December 24, 2019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Design and Development Director and Planning staff have reviewed pending items and determined that there is no need to hold the November 26, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. • The regular Planning Commission meeting of December 24, 2019 falls on Christmas Eve which is a designated holiday per the Personnel Policies. • Advance notice of cancelled meetings will allow Planning Commissioners, Staff and the public to properly plan for deadlines, workflow, and their schedules. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Design and Development Director and Planning Staff have reviewed items requiring Planning Commission (Commission) consideration and there are no matters that require the Commission’s review on November 26, 2019. Additionally, the regular Commission meeting of December 24, 2019 falls on Christmas Eve which is a designated holiday per the Personnel Policies. Matters requiring the Commission’s review have been scheduled for December 10, 2019. Since staff would not need to prepare agenda packets for these meetings, there would be a cost savings associated with production the packets. The next regular meeting of the Commission is January 14, 2020. The recommended November/December/January meeting schedule is: • November 26, 2019 CANCEL • December 10, 2019 regular meeting • December 24, 2019 CANCEL • January 14, 2020 regular meeting ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Wanda Wise-Latta, Commission Secretary Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 9 10 City of La Quinta PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: NOVEMBER 12, 2019 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019- 0002, VARIANCE 2019-0001, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0002 PROPOSING A 2,790 SQUARE-FOOT DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT: DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS APPLICANT: KAIDENCE GROUP OWNER: LQ INVESTMENTS CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPROVED FOR PLOT PLAN 91-456 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91-187 AND APPROVED ON APRIL 16, 1991. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO, APNs 770-020-015 THROUGH 770-020-021 RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution recommending that the City Council approve Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The La Quinta Village Shopping Center (Center) was approved in April 1991 for an approximate 116,660 square foot (sf) shopping center on the site via Plot Plan 91-456 (PP 91-456). A General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Environmental Assessment were also approved. • PP 91-456 was amended in 1992 and 1994 to reduce the shopping center from 116,600 sf to 79,333 sf. The shopping center was built and exists under the 79,333 sf configuration. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 • The applicant is requesting to construct a 2,790 sf. drive-through Starbucks building with an outdoor patio within the parking lot of the Center (Attachment 1). • In order to accommodate a drive-through, the applicant has proposed a Zone Change from Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to Community Commercial (CC), and requests a variance for the drive-thru facility to be closer than the minimum 200 feet distance from residential, and a reduction of the car length space after the drive-thru exit. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Center was approved in April 1991 for an approximate 116,660 sf. shopping center on the site via PP 91-456 and Environmental Assessment 91- 187 (EA 91-187). A General Plan Amendment and Zone Change were also approved to allow for commercial uses. An amendment was approved in November 1992 in order to decrease the project size to 85,645 sf of commercial space. A second amendment was approved in April 1994 to reduce the commercial square footage to 79,333 and to revise building and circulation configuration. The shopping center that exists today was built under the configuration approved in the second amendment (Attachment 2). Zone Change The applicant requests Zone Change (ZC) approval for the new proposed drive- through. The existing CN zone does not allow drive-throughs whereas the proposed CC zone does. The CN district is intended to meet the daily needs of a neighborhood area whereas the CC district is intended to meet the needs of a multi-neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it abuts existing apartment complexes, is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes directly east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential communities at SilverRock. The property is similar in purpose and size to other CC sites throughout the City (Attachment 3). The ZC would provide more uses that would be permitted by right or by use permit for the Center. This provides more options for activity within the Center, including more options for the former Ralphs building which has been vacant since 2014. The ZC would not create any nonconformities for any of the structures or uses currently existing. Attachment 4 highlights the changes that would occur through the change from CN to CC. Variance The applicant requests a variance from drive-through facilities Section 9.100.270(A) and (G), as follows: - No drive-through facility shall be permitted within 200 feet of any residentially zoned or used property. The applicant proposes to be 170 feet away. - Exits from drive-through facilities shall be at least three vehicles in length. The applicant proposes the drive-through exit to be one vehicle in length. Attachment 5 provides the applicant’s variance statement of findings for justification on the proposed variance and is summarized as follows: - The 200-foot distance to residential zoned property requirement is not being met by a total of 30 ft, to the closest residential property east of Washington street. There is a major arterial road, two screen walls, existing landscaping, and additional proposed landscaping that will create an adequate buffer. - The exiting requirement is mitigated by the distance from the exit of the drive-through to the egress onto Washington Street. There is 138 feet of stacking room from the exit to Washington St. The City’s traffic engineer concurred with this statement and did not feel it would create an adverse impact on internal circulation or surrounding streets. - Special circumstances exist with the parcel shape, location, and surrounding existing buildings and infrastructure that make it difficult to orient the building to meet distance and exit queuing standards. The building site is located within a narrow portion of a larger parcel and other orientations of the building were not feasible. (Attachment 2). Site Development Permit The applicant requests Site Development Permit (SDP) approval for the new 2,790 sf drive-through Starbucks. SDP approval is requested for landscaping and architectural design of the Starbucks (Attachment 6). Site Design The building will consist of a 2,790 sf. Starbucks coffee shop with a 700 sf. outdoor dining patio and drive-through facility. The building reflects design similar and compatible with the surrounding buildings within the Center: sloped roofs with mission tiles, exterior plaster, and wood trellis and will also incorporate stone veneer, flat roof porch, and a light tan and brown color palette (Attachment 7). The building meets all development standards of the CC zone, including setbacks, floor area ratio, and heights. The maximum height of 20’-8” meets the height requirements of the image corridor standards as required due to proximity to Washington Street. The building requires 35 parking stalls and the proposal includes 27 parking spaces on site which would include dedicated parking spaces for electrical vehicles and Mobile Order Parking. The building would also include a removal of 27 existing parking spaces, which would bring the total parking spaces in the Center from 489 to 462, which would be 1 space per every 179 sf for the entire 82,823 sq. ft. shopping center. This project is proposed within the Village Build-Out Plan Area where a reduction of fifty percent is allowed and any variation of the parking standard can be approved. Given the fifty percent reduction allowed, combined with shared parking allowable within the shopping center, the proposed building would still have adequate parking for its operations. The applicant prepared a traffic memo to analyze impacts the new building and drive-through facility could have on surrounding streets, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Traffic Engineer (Attachment 8). This memo took into account the future reduced lane configuration of Calle Tampico. The drive- through configuration meets the drive-through standards of the City, except as previously mentioned in the requested variance. Landscaping and Lighting New landscaping is proposed within the project site. The landscaping along the Washington Street perimeter which will remain as is (Attachment 6 – Page 11). The assorted species of plants and trees, including agaves, bougainvillea, and Mexican heather, add character to the proposed development, are consistent with desert landscaping palettes in the City and existing Center, and provide sufficient screening and accents around the vehicular circulation areas. The proposed shrubs along the drive-through stacking area provide sufficient screening and complements existing palms and wall along Washington Street. Project lighting will include parking lot lighting with 26’ tall LED light posts and building mounted lights well below the roof line. The building mounted lights will be modern outdoor bronze sconces (Attachment 7). The photometric plan provided meets the City’s parking lot lighting standards. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on April 25, 2019. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice The public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on November 1, 2019 and was sent to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site. The applicant also noticed and hosted a community meeting on October 30, 2019 at the local Embassy Suites. No comments have been received as of this date. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the mitigated negative declaration approved for Plot Plan 91-456 and environmental assessment 91-187, approved on April 16, 1991. The original approval included a shopping center with a build out of 116,600 sf of commercial space. Subsequent amendments reduced this to 79,333 sf, the current configuration. This proposal increases the square footage to 82,823, which is still well under the original 116,600 analyzed by the original environmental assessment. The applicant prepared a traffic memo, on file with the Design and Development Department, that demonstrates no significant impacts from the drive-through facility. Prepared by: Carlos Flores, Senior Planner Approved by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Attachments: 1. Project Information 2. Vicinity Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Highlighted Zone Change Use Changes 5. Applicant Variance Justification 6. Site Development Permit Plan Set 7. Color and Material Board 8. Traffic Memo 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, ZONE CHANGE, AND VARIANCE FOR A NEW 2,790 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS AND FIND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019-0002, VARIANCE 2019-0001, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0002 APPLICANT: KAIDENCE GROUP WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 12th day of November, 2019, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, to consider a request by Kaidence Group for recommendation of approval of a site development permit, zone change, and variance, to allow for a new drive- through Starbucks coffee shop located at the northwest corner of Washington Street and Calle Tampico, more particularly described as: APN: 770-020-015 through 770-020-021 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on November 1, 2019 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, Site Development Permit 2019-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage a full range of commercial uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 2 of 10 those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City and provide a broad range of goods and services to its residents and region. • Goal LU-2 as the project consists of high quality design that complements and enhances the City. The design of the project incorporates the existing architectural style within commercial center but enhances it with modern architectural elements. • Program CIR-1.12.a: Locate land uses that provide jobs and housing near each other to allow the use of alternative modes of travel and produce shorter work commutes. The project will be developed with access to existing Villa Cortina Apartments and Seasons residential development, providing an opportunity for jobs and housing near each other. The project is also located in close proximity to existing residential developments to the north, south, and east. • Policy CIR-1.16 which states to continue to implement the Image Corridor treatments throughout the City. This project maintains a height under 22 feet within the first 150 feet from Washington Street, an image corridor, which is consistent with the Image Corridor standards. • Policy ED-1.2 as it will support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and the recruitment of new businesses. This proposal is for the retention of an existing Starbucks to construct a new building within the same shopping center. Drive-throughs are an attractive use in facilitating the recruitment of new businesses. • Policy ED-1.5 which states projects proposed on commercial land shall be evaluated for their job creating and revenue generating potential. This project’s scope and operations will create jobs and lead to annual sales tax and generate transit occupancy tax revenue for the City. 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial District. The Community Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 3 of 10 Commercial district is intended to meet the needs of a multi- neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it abuts existing apartment developments, is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential community at SilverRock. 3. Compliance with CEQA The Design and Development Department has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the mitigated negative declaration approved for Plot Plan 91-456 and Environmental Assessment 91- 187 and approved on April 16, 1991. As mentioned, the original approval approved a shopping center under a 116,600 square foot of commercial space build out. Subsequent amendments lowered this to 79,333 square feet, which is how it currently exists. This proposal increases the square footage to 82,823, which is still well under the original 116,600 square feet analyzed by the original environmental assessment. 4. Architectural Design The architecture and layout of the project is compatible with, and not detrimental to, the existing surrounding commercial land uses, the existing commercial buildings within the shopping center, and is consistent with the development standards in the Municipal Code. 5. Site Design The site design of the project is compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Landscape Design The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. Landscape improvements are designed and sized to provide visual appeal. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture, be Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 4 of 10 compatible with existing landscaping surrounding the building, and helps provide adequate screening for the drive-through. Zone Change 2019-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.220.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Zone Change from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial: 7. Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage a full range of commercial uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City and provide a broad range of goods and services to its residents and region. The Zone Change will allow for more options for the subject site to provide broader range of goods and services. • Program CIR-1.12.a: Locate land uses that provide jobs and housing near each other to allow the use of alternative modes of travel and produce shorter work commutes. The project will have access to existing adjacent Villa Cortina Apartments and Seasons residential development, providing an opportunity for jobs and housing near each other. Housing developments are also to the south, west and east of the project site. • Policy ED-1.2 as it will support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and the recruitment of new businesses. This proposal is for the retention of an existing Starbucks to construct a new building within the same shopping center. The Zone Change will allow for more uses within the center, opening up new opportunities for recruitment of new businesses. Drive-throughs are an attractive use in facilitating the recruitment of new businesses. Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 5 of 10 • Policy ED-1.3 as it will encourage the expansion of the Village as a specialty retail, dining and residential destination. The project site is located within the Village Build Out Plan, and the zone change allows the subject site to have more uses consistent with Village Commercial district, enhancing the Village area as a specialty retail, dining and residential destination. • Policy ED-1.5 which states projects proposed on commercial land shall be evaluated for their job creating and revenue generating potential. This project will allow for more options for the subject site to allow for more job and revenue opportunities. 8. Public Welfare Approval of the zone map change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. 9. Land Use Compatibility The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties. The project site is located within the Village Build Out Plan, and the zone change allows the subject site to have more uses consistent with the surrounding Village Commercial district. The new zoning district is intended to meet the needs of a multi-neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it abuts existing apartment developments, is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential community at SilverRock. The property would be similar in purpose and size to other Community Commercial sites throughout the City. 10. Property Suitability The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property. The project site is located within the Village Build Out Plan, and the zone change allows the subject site to have more uses consistent with the surrounding Village Commercial district. The new zoning district is intended to meet the needs of a multi-neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 6 of 10 abuts existing apartment developments, is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential community at SilverRock. The property would be similar in purpose and size to other Community Commercial sites throughout the City. 11. Change in Circumstances. Approval of the zone map change is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing zoning was imposed. The existing zoning was imposed in 1991. Since that time, the areas surrounding the subject site have developed into multiple residential neighborhoods and the nearby Village Commercial district has developed. The project site is located within the Village Build Out Plan, and the zone change allows the subject site to have more uses consistent with the surrounding Village Commercial district. The new zoning district is intended to meet the needs of a multi-neighborhood area, whereas the current zoning district is intended to serve a singular neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential community at SilverRock. The property would be similar in purpose and size to other Community Commercial sites throughout the City. Variance 2019-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Variance 12. Consistency with General Plan The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. The City’s General Plan policies relating to General Commercial encourage a full range of commercial Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 7 of 10 uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU-6 and ED-1 as it will contribute to a balanced and varied economic base which provides fiscal stability to the City and provide a broad range of goods and services to its residents and region. • Goal LU-2 as the project consists of high quality design that complements and enhances the City. The design of project incorporates existing architectural style within commercial center but enhances it with modern architectural elements as well as stone veneer and wooden trellis. • Program CIR-1.12.a: Locate land uses that provide jobs and housing near each other to allow the use of alternative modes of travel and produce shorter work commutes. The project will be developed with access to existing Villa Cortina Apartments and Seasons residential development, providing an opportunity for jobs and housing near each other. Housing developments are also to the south, west and east of the project site. • Policy CIR-1.16 which states to continue to implement the Image Corridor treatments throughout the City. This project maintains a height under 22 feet within the first 150 feet from Washington Street, an image corridor, which is consistent with the Image Corridor standards. • Policy ED-1.2 as it will support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and the recruitment of new businesses. This proposal is for the retention of an existing Starbucks to construct a new building within the same shopping center. • Policy ED-1.5 which states projects proposed on commercial land shall be evaluated for their job creating and revenue generating potential. This project’s scope and operations will create jobs and lead to annual sales tax and generate transit occupancy tax revenue for the City. 13. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City’s Zoning Code and the purpose and intent of the Community Commercial District. The Community Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 8 of 10 Commercial district is intended to meet the needs of a multi- neighborhood area. The project site is located in an area that does serve multiple neighborhoods as it abuts existing apartment developments, is in close proximity to the Cove, residential homes east of Washington Street, residential communities on the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50, and residential communities north and south of Avenue 52, including future residential community at SilverRock. 14. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Design and Development Department has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the mitigated negative declaration approved for Plot Plan 91-456 and Environmental Assessment 91-187 and approved on April 16, 1991. As mentioned, the original approval approved a shopping center under a 116,600 square foot of commercial space build out. Subsequent amendments lowered this to 79,333 square feet, which is how it currently exists. This proposal increases the square footage to 82,823, which is still well under the original 116,600 square feet analyzed by the original environmental assessment. 15. Surrounding Uses As conditioned, approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity. 16. Special Circumstances There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, location and surrounding, which, when the zoning regulations are strictly applied, deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulated. Special circumstances exist with the parcel and building shape, location, and surrounding existing building and facilities that require the proposed location to be the most feasible. Special circumstances exist with the parcel shape, location, and surrounding existing buildings and infrastructure that make it difficult to orient the building to meet distance and exit queuing standards. The building site is located within a narrow portion of a larger parcel and other orientations of the building were not feasible. This proposal is for an Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 9 of 10 existing Starbucks within the Center to now open a new building within same shopping center but not adhere to the following drive-through standards: - No drive-through facility shall be permitted within two hundred feet of any residentially zoned or used property. The applicant proposes to be 170 feet away. - Exits from drive-through facilities shall be at least three vehicles in length. The applicant proposes to be one vehicle in length All other La Quinta Municipal Code development standards were met. Other orientations of the building were attempted but made quite difficult due to the limited configuration of the project parcel and location of existing buildings and infrastructure within the shopping center. The building site is located within a narrow portion of a larger parcel and other orientations of the building were not feasible. 17. Preservation of Property Rights The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district and otherwise denied to the subject property. 18. No Special Privileges The conditions of approval assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges which are inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulations. 19. No Land Use Variance The approval does not authorize a land use or activity which is not permitted in the applicable zoning district. The applicant is proposing a zone change to Community Commercial which allows for drive through facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case. Planning Commission Resolution 2019-011 Site Development Permit 2019-0002, Zone Change 2019-0002, Variance 2019-0001, and Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Starbucks Adopted: November 12, 2019 Page 10 of 10 SECTION 2. That the above project be determined to be consistent with Environmental Assessment 91-187. SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve of Site Development Permit 2019- 0002, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. SECTION 4. That it does hereby approve of Zone Change 2019-0002, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. SECTION 5. That it does hereby approve of Variance 2019-0001, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 12th day of November, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _________________________ MARY CALDWELL, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: _________________________________________ DANNY CASTRO, Design and Development Director City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 1 of 14 Page 1 of 14 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (“City”), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Site Development Permit 2019-0002 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2019-0002 Variance 2019-0001 Zone Change 2019-0002 Plot Plan 91-456, Amendments 1 and 2 Environmental Assessment 91-187 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Development Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form – Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Planning Division • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) 27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 2 of 14 Page 2 of 14 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (“RWQCB”) acknowledgment of the applicant’s Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7- 2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board’s Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (“SWPPP”) to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant’s SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non-Storm Water Management. 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 3 of 14 Page 3 of 14 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction BMPs as required. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney’s fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant’s fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer’s failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 8. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. 9. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the 29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 4 of 14 Page 4 of 14 proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing parking lot that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities. 10. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street and Calle Tampico is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 11. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 12. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 13. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking space design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 18 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for all parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible parking space is required per 6 accessible parking spaces. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 28 feet as shown on the Preliminary Precise Grading Plan or as approved by the City Engineer. 30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 5 of 14 Page 5 of 14 Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 14. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5” a.c./5.5” c.a.b. Loading Areas 6” P.C.C./4” c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 15. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 16. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. 17. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as “engineer,” “surveyor,” and “architect,” refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 6 of 14 Page 6 of 14 18. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 19. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) B. On-Site Precise Grading Plan 1” = 20’ Horizontal NOTE: A through B to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. “On-Site Precise Grading” plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official, Design and Development Director, and the City Engineer. “On-Site Precise Grading” plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. All On-Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the City Engineer. 20. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the Public Works Development “Plans, Notes and Design Guidance” section of the City website (www.laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Design and Development Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 7 of 14 Page 7 of 14 21. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 22. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as-built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. GRADING 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 24. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 25. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical (“soils”) report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. 33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 8 of 14 Page 8 of 14 All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 27. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6’) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 28. Building pad elevations on the grading plan submitted for City Engineer’s approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the Site Development Permit preliminary plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 29. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. 30. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5’) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 9 of 14 Page 9 of 14 31. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. DRAINAGE 32. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage reports for the La Quinta Starbucks (SDP2019-0002), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100-year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3- hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 34. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 35. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 36. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 10 of 14 Page 10 of 14 37. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. 38. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 – Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 39. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 40. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 41. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 42. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 43. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City’s NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post-construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs 36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 11 of 14 Page 11 of 14 approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post-construction stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 45. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above-ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 46. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 47. A set of building plans shall be submitted to the Fire Marshal’s office for review 48. A fire flow letter will need to be submitted no or before building plan submittal. A minimum of 1,750 gpm for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi residual is required. 49. A water review will need to be assessed to dictate the need to ad an additional fire hydrant to protect new proposed structure. CONSTRUCTION 50. Project address location shall be updated to 50951 Washington Street as assigned by the Building Division. If alternate address is requested, please provide formal request to the City’s Building Official. 37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 12 of 14 Page 12 of 14 51. Plans shall be prepared to the applicable code at the time of submittal for the building permit, currently the 2016 California Building Standards, but will change to the 2019 California Building standards as of January 2020. 52. Any building, structure, facility, complex or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public shall be provided barrier free design to ensure that these improvements are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities. Plans shall fully detail how the proposed facility complies with the California Accessibility Standards defined in Title 24 Chapter 11B and Federal ADA Regulations. More information is available through the States website as part of AB 3002 here: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/DSA/Resources/Page- Content/Resources-List-Folder/AB-3002 53. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly- maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 54. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 55. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 56. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 57. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Design and Development Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height, and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 58. All water features shall be designed to minimize “splash”, and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 13 of 14 Page 13 of 14 59. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 60. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Design and Development Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Design and Development Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Design and Development Director and/or City Engineer. 61. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition” or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 62. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PUBLIC SERVICES 63. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. 64. Consistent with the letter provided by Sunline dated May 3, 2019, the existing bus stop #869 located on the northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street could be impacted by the improvement project. According to the proposed plans, bus stop #869 may need to be temporarily closed while work is being performed at that located. Contractor performing work shall contact Sunline at least thirty (30) days in advance of work commencing so arrangements can be made to have the existing amenities closed or removed. MAINTENANCE 65. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2019- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 STARBUCKS ADOPTED: Page 14 of 14 Page 14 of 14 66. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on-site improvements, perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 67. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 68. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 40 Project Information CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2019-0002 ZONE CHANGE 2019-0002 VARIANCE 2019-0001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0002 APPLICANT: KAIDENCE GROUP PROPERTY OWNER: LQ INVESTMENTS REQUEST: ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, ZONE CHANGE, AND VARIANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 2,790 SQUARE FOOT DRIVE THROUGH STARBUCKS AND FIND THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 91-187. LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND CALLE TAMPICO APNs: 770-020-15 THROUGH 770-020-021 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PROPOSED CHANGE TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES CITY HALL EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL WEST: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ATTACHMENT 1 42 CALLE TAMPICO WASHINGTON STRW 770020015 770020010 RW RW 770020017 770020020770020014 770020016 770020018 770020013 RW 770020021 770020019 RW 770105001 770096005 770104006 770104011 RW 770105002 770031015 770096006 770031001770031002 770031016 770104007 770104001 ATTACHMENT 243 44 RM 17/1 RMH RL 10,000 RL 10,000 17/1 17/1/10 RM 17/1 RL 17/1 OS OS RL OS PR OS OS GC GC RL FP OS GC OS FP MC GC OS RL RL OS OS GC GC GC OS GC RL RL GC RL GC FP GC GC GC GC RL GC RM CR RL CT GC GC RL GC CT GC RL GC GC RL GC GC RL GC CR GC GC GC CR RL OS OS RL RM GC RL RL RL GC GC GC RL CT GC CT GC RMH GC MC RM GC RVL OS GC RL OS RVL GC RL GC GC CR PR RL GC GC MC VC GC RVL RL RL RL MC GC RL MC CT CR RL GC RL GC GC RL CP GC RL RH MC GC RVL CC CP RL GC RL GC GC RH GC RM GC RM GC RL GC RL GC GC RL RL GC RL MC RL GC GC RL GC GC GC MC CR RL GC PR FP RL RL RL RL GC RL RM GC RM RL RL RL RL GC GC CT GC RL RVL RL GC RL RL MC RL GC RL RL RL RM CC RL GC RL RL RL GC RL GC GC GC GC MC PR RL RL GC RL RL RL RL RM RL CO GC RL RL RL GC CC RL CC GC GC RL PR RL RL MC RL RL RL FP CT GC FP RL CN RL GC RL RL GC RL RL RL RL RL RL GC CC GC RL GC RL RL GC RH RL RL RL RL RL CN RL RL RL CT RM RL RL RL RL CC RL RL RL CR RL CN RM RL PR OS MC CN RL RL RL RL RL GC RL RL RL CN RL CN RL GC CN GC OS RL RMH RL RL RL RL PR RM RL RL RL RL RL GC FP RM RL RL GC RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL CT RL RL GC RL RL RM RL RL RL RL VC RL RL RMH RMH RL RL RMH CT CT GC RL VC OS RMH RL RL PR GC RL RL PR RL RL RL RL RL RM PR RL RL RL RL RMH RM RL RL RMH RM RL RL RL RMH RL CN RL RL RL RL PR RL RL VC RL RL RL RL RL RC RL PR RC RC RM RC RC RC RC RL GC RL RC OS RC CC RL RL RM RMH RL RMH RMH CC MC RC RLVC FP RC RM VC MC MC RL RL FP RL RL RL RL RL RL RL FP RL RM RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RMH RH RL RM RL RL RL RL RMH RL VC RMH PR VC PR CC RL VCMC RM PR MC MCPRPRMC RL PR MCPR MC MC MC PRCC MC FP RL PR PR RL PR PR PR MC PRPR GC GC GC RMH RL OS OS RM RVL OS RL PR RL RL RL RM RMH RM MC PR MC RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL I RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL RL CC RL RL CC RL RL RL CC MC RHCN CC CN MC CN CC 62nd Ave Harrison StAirport Blvd 52nd AveMadison StJefferson St50th AveWashington St0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5Miles 1 inch = 1,400 feet F RMH RL 10 RL 10,000 17/1 17/1/10 RM 17/ RM VC GC RM RL MC MC GC MC CN RMGC GC GC VC VC PR PR VC RL GC VC RC VC MC MC RM VC VC VCMC RL RL RM The Village inset Avenue 52 Avenue 50 Washington St.Avenue BermudasCalle Tampico Eisenhower Dr.July 2016  City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map Monroe StJackson StVan Buren St54th Ave 58th Ave 60th Ave 48th Ave Highway 111 Fred Waring Dr 50th Avenue Washington St.Eisenhower Dr.Legend RESIDENTIAL Very Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium High Density Residential High Density Residential Cove Residential VILLAGE COMMERCIAL Village Commercial NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Regional Commercial Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Tourist Commercial Commercial Park Office Commercial Major Community Facilities Industrial SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Parks and Recreation Open Space Golf Course Floodplain SPECIAL SYMBOLS Overlay Areas Low Density Agriculture/Equestrian Residential Overlay Equestrian Overlay City Limit Sphere of Influence and Planning Areas Riverside County Parcel Boundaries ATTACHMENT 3 45 46 9.80.020 Table of permitted uses. A. Uses and Structures Permitted. Table 9-5, Permitted Uses in Nonresidential Districts, following, specifies those uses and structures which are permitted within each nonresidential district. The letters in the columns beneath the district designations mean the following: 1.“P”: Permitted as a principal use within the district. 2.“A”: Permitted only if accessory to the principal use on the site. 3.“C”: Permitted as a principal or accessory use if a conditional use permit is approved. 4.“M”: Permitted if a minor use permit is approved. 5.“T”: Permitted as a temporary use only. 6.“X”: Prohibited in the district. 7.“S”: Permitted under a specific plan. B. Uses Not Listed in Table. Land uses which are not listed in Table 9-5 are not permitted unless the planning or the planning commission determines that such use is within one of the permitted use categories listed (e.g., principal use, conditional use, etc.) in accordance with Section 9.20.040. Table 9-5 Permitted Uses in Nonresidential Districts P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Retail Uses Retail stores under 10,000 sq. ft. floor area per business P P P P P P X P Retail stores1, 10,000—50,000 sq. ft. floor area P P P P X X X P Retail stores1, over 50,000 sq. ft. floor area P C M X X X X X Food, liquor and convenience P A P P A A X P 47 ATTACHMENT 4 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC stores under 10,000 sq. ft. floor area, open less than 18 hours/day2 Food, liquor and convenience stores under 10,000 sq. ft. floor area, open 18 or more hours/day2 M X M M M X X M Plant nurseries and garden supply stores, with no propagation of plants on the premises, subject to Section 9.100.120 (Outdoor storage and display) P X P P X X X P Showroom/catal og stores, without substantial on- site inventory P P P X X X X X General Services Barbershops, beauty, nail and tanning salons and similar uses P A P P P A X P Miscellaneous services such as travel services, photo and video services, shoe repair, appliance repair, and similar uses P A P P P A X P 48 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Laundromats and dry cleaners, except central cleaning plants P X P P P X X M Printing, blueprinting and copy services P P P P P P X P Pet grooming— without overnight boarding P X P P P X X P Office and Health Services Banks P X P P P P X P General and professional offices P P P P P P P P Medical offices— physicians, dentists, optometrists, chiropractors and similar practitioners, 3 or fewer offices in one building P P P P P P X P Medical centers/clinics —four or more offices in one building P X P C X P X P Surgicenters/me dical clinics P P P C X P X X Hospitals C X X X X X C X Convalescent hospitals C X C X X X C X Veterinary clinics/animal hospitals and pet boarding (indoor only) M M M M X X X M Dining, Drinking and Entertainment Uses 49 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Restaurants, other than drive-through P A P P P X A P Restaurants, drive-through P A P X P X X X Restaurants, counter take-out with ancillary seating, such as yogurt, ice cream, pastry shops and similar P P P P P X A P Bars and cocktail lounges M M M M M X X M Dance clubs and nightclubs C C C X C X X C Dancing or live entertainment as an accessory use A A A A A X X A Theaters, live or motion picture P X M M M X A M Tobacco shops without onsite smoking, as per the provisions of the Heath and Sanitation Code P X P P A X X P Cigar lounges, hookah bars, and similar uses with onsite smoking, as per the provisions of the Health and Sanitation Code M X M M A X X M Recreation Uses Bowling alleys P X P X P X X C Pool or billiard centers as a principal use C C C X C X X C 50 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Pool or billiard tables as accessory use (3 tables or less) A A A A A A X A Game machines as an accessory use A A A A A A X A Golf courses and country clubs (see GC district permitted uses, Chapter 9.120) X X X X A X X X Driving range unlighted P A C X P A P X Tennis clubs or complexes C A C X X A C X Health clubs, martial arts studios, and dance studios, 5,000 sq. ft. floor area or less P P P P P P P P Health clubs, martial arts studios, and dance studios, over 5,000 sq. ft. floor area M M M M M M M M Libraries P P P P P P P P Museum P P P P P P P P Arts and crafts studios, including classes P P P P P P P P Parks, unlighted playfields and open space P P P P P P P P Lighted playfields X X X X X X C C Bicycle, equestrian and P P P P P P P P 51 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC hiking trails Indoor pistol or rifle ranges X C X X X X X X Miniature golf/recreation centers M X X X M X X X Ice skating rinks M M M X M X M X Assembly Uses Lodges, union halls, social clubs and community centers P P P P X X P P Churches, temples and other places of worship M M M M X M X M Mortuaries and funeral homes M M M X X X X X Public and Semipublic Uses Fire stations P P P P P P P P Government offices and police stations P P P P P P P P Communication towers and equipment (freestanding, new towers) subject to Chapter 9.170 C C C C C C C C Communication towers and equipment (co- location, mounted to existing facility) subject to Chapter 9.170 M M M M M M M M Electrical substations X M X X X X M X Water wells and pumping P P P P P P P P 52 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC stations Reservoirs and water tanks X X X X X X P X Public flood control facilities and devices P P P P P P P P Colleges and universities C M X X X M C C Vocational schools, e.g., barber, beauty and similar M C C X X C C C Private elementary, intermediate and high schools C C C C C C C C Helicopter pads X X X X C X C X Public or private kennels and animal shelters (with indoor or outdoor pet boarding) X C X X X X C X Residential, Lodging and Child Daycare Uses Existing single family home X X X X X X X P Townhome and multifamily dwelling as a primary use3,4 C3 C4 C C C C X C Residential as an accessory use, e.g., caretaker residences per Section 9.100.160 M M M M M M M M Child daycare facilities, centers and preschools as a M M M M X M M M 53 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC principal use, subject to Section 9.100.240 (also see Accessory Uses) Senior group housing X X X X X X X M Rooming and boarding houses X X X X X X X M Single room occupancy (SRO) hotels, subject to Section 9.100.250 C X X X X X X X Emergency shelters P P P P P P P X Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse C X X X X X C X Single-family residential X X X X X X X X Mixed-use projects subject to Section 9.110.130 P P P P P P X P RV rental parks and ownership/mem bership parks X X X X M X X X Resort residential S X C X C X X Hotels and motels P X P X P X X P Timeshare facilities, fractional ownership, subject to P X P X P X X P 54 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Section 9.60.290 Automotive, Automobile Uses5 Golf cart, neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV), and electric scooter sales P P P M X X X M Automobile service stations, with or without minimart subject to Section 9.100.230 C C C C X X X C Car washes M M M X X X X X Auto body repair and painting; transmission repair X C X X X X X X Auto repair specialty shops, providing minor auto maintenance: tire sales/service, muffler, brake, lube and tune- up services C C C X X X X X Auto and motorcycle sales and rentals M M X X X X X X Used vehicle sales, not associated with a new vehicle sales facility, as per Section 9.100.260 C C X X X X X X Truck, C C X X X X X 55 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC recreation vehicle and boat sales Auto parts stores, with no repair or parts installation on the premises P P P P X X X P Auto or truck storage yards, not including dismantling X C X X X X X X Private parking lots/garages as a principal use subject to Chapter 9.150, Parking C C C X C C X C Warehousing and Heavy Commercial Uses5 Wholesaling/dis tribution centers, general warehouses with no sales to consumers C P X X X X X X Mini-storage X X6 X X X X X X Lumber yards, outdoor (see retail stores for indoor lumber sales) X M X X X X X X Pest control services M P X X X X X X Contractor offices, public utility and similar equipment/stora ge yards X M X X X X P X Central cleaning or laundry plants X X X X A X X X Industrial and Research Uses 56 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Indoor manufacture and assembly of components or finished products X P X X X X X X Research and development P P X X X X X X Recording studios M P X X X X X M Bottling plants X P X X X X X X Recycling centers as a primary use, collection and sorting only, subject to Section 9.100.190 X C X X X X C X Off-site hazardous waste facilities X C X X X X X X Accessory Uses and Structures Construction and guard offices, subject to Section 9.100.170 P P P P P P P P Portable outdoor vendor uses subject to Section 9.100.100 M M M M M M M M Swimming pools as an accessory use A A A A A A A A Indoor golf or tennis facilities as an accessory use A A A A A A A A Outdoor golf or tennis facilities as an accessory M M M M M M M M 57 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC use Antennas and satellite dishes, subject to Section 9.100.070 A A A A A A A A Reverse vending machines and recycling dropoff bins, subject to Section 9.100.190 A A A A X X A M Incidental on- site products or services for employees or businesses, such as child day care, cafeterias and business support uses A A A A A A A A Other accessory uses and structures which are customarily associated with and subordinate to the principal use on the premises and are consistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning district, as determined by the director A A A A A A A A Temporary Uses Christmas tree sales, subject to Section 9.100.080 T T T T X X T T 58 P = Permitted use A = Accessory use C = Conditional use permit M = Minor use permit T = Temporary use permit X = Prohibited use Region al Comm ercial Comm ercial Park Comm unity Comm ercial Neighbo rhood Comme rcial Touris t Comm ercial Office Comm ercial Major Comm unity Faciliti es Village Comm ercial Land Use CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Halloween pumpkin sales, subject to Section 9.100.080 T T T T X X T T Stands selling fresh produce in season, subject to Section 9.100.090 T T T T X X T T Sidewalk sales, subject to Section 9.100.120 T T T T T T X T Temporary outdoor events, subject to Section 9.100.130 T T T T T T T T Use of relocatable building, subject to Section 9.100.180 T T T T T T T T Holiday period storage subject to Section 9.100.145 M M M M M M M M Other Uses Sexually oriented businesses, subject to Section 9.110.0807 C X X X X X X X Medical marijuana dispensaries X X X X X X X X Other uses not listed in this table: per Section 9.20.040, director or planning commission to determine whether use is permitted 59 Notes: 1 Unless use is specifically listed elsewhere in this table. 2 With no consumption of alcohol on the premises. 3 If part of a mixed-use project per Section 9.140.090. 4 Subject to Section 9.30.070 (RH, High Density Residential District) for density, Section 9.60.270. 5 Subject to Section 9.100.110, Outdoor storage and display. 6 Mini-storage warehousing operating on December 17, 2008 (the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section), are considered legal, conforming land uses. Existing facilities may be reconstructed if damaged, and may be modified or expanded within the boundaries of the lot on which they occur as of December 17, 2008 with approval of a site development permit. Any modification or expansion shall conform to the development standards for the commercial park zoning district contained in Chapter 9.90, Nonresidential Development Standards. 7 Property must also be located within the SOB (sexually oriented business) overlay district. (Ord. 562 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016) 60 1 of 3 5070 N 40th St #210, Phoenix, AZ 85018 September 13,2019 VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION STATEMENT OF FINDINGS Surrounding Uses. Why will approval of the variance not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties of land uses in the vicinity? Distance to Residential Zone: The proposed Starbucks drive-thru within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center is 170 feet east of a residential zone. There is a major arterial road, Washington Street, between the Starbucks drive-thru and residential zone, as well as, two screen walls (one on the residential side, one on the shopping center side). In efforts to provide additional screening for the drive-thru, the interior side of the Washington Street screen wall will be lined with landscape (bushes and shrubbery). The drive-thru will not impact the residential zone with any more noise than what is already omitted by the major arterial. Currently there are fourteen (14) businesses in operation within the La Quinta Village Shopping center, uses ranging from restaurant, dry cleaners, bank and salons, none of which cause harm to the surrounding residential zone. The proposed Starbucks drive-thru is a relocation of the current Starbucks in La Quinta Village Shopping center located directly north of the proposed new location. Drive-Thru Exit Vehicle Count: The La Quinta Municipal Code requires “3 car vehicle stack at the exit of the drive-thru.” The proposed Starbucks currently shows a nine (9) car queue length and allows for one (1) vehicle space between the pick-up window and the exit of the drive-through. The drive-thru is located within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center and does not exit onto an arterial road. There is a one hundred thirty-eight (138) feet of stacking room from the exit of the drive-through to the egress onto Washington St. This distance allows for about 7 cars from drive-thru exit to major arterial egress out of the shopping center. With the Starbucks being within a shopping center and having one hundred thirty-eight (138) additional feet of drive aisle to exit the drive-thru, there is no anticipation for stacking at the exit of the drive-thru. Special Circumstances. What special circumstances are applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which, when the zoning regulations are strictly applied, deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulations? In order for the La Quinta Village Shopping Center to have a drive-thru Starbucks, a brand-new building needs to be erected. Due to the existing orientation of the shopping center and the current parcel configuration, there was only one location that would fit a 2,675 SF building with patio and drive-through. The proposed site falls within the same parcel as the old Ralph’s and parking lot that serves the majority of the center. This parcel within the development, makes different orientations of the proposed building quite difficult. In order ATTACHMENT 5 61 2 of 3 5070 N 40th St #210, Phoenix, AZ 85018 to maximize the site and meet all major code requirements, the current site plan is the best option. Any other site plan would have resulted in a shorter drive-thru queue, a smaller building, poor circulation or simply a vacant lot. Although the drive-through falls 30 feet short of the 200-foot residential zone requirement, we feel that this will have no impact on the surrounding residential zones. As mentioned previously, Washington Street, which is a major arterial road with 2-way traffic, falls between the shopping center and residential zone along with two (2) screen walls. Because the drive-through is within a shopping center, we do not anticipate any drive- through stacking flowing onto the major arterial. To be more specific, there is a one hundred thirty-eight (138) feet distance from the exit of the drive-through to Washington Street. Preservation of Property Rights: Why is granting of the variance necessary for preservation of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zoning district and otherwise denied to the subject property? Distance to Residential Zone: As previously stated, the proposed Starbucks drive-thru is a relocation of the Starbucks that is currently operating within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center. The proposed location for the Starbucks drive-thru is limited on building orientation and drive-thru configuration. The site plan we are proposing, meets all major code requirements while maximizing the space. With this proposed configuration, the drive thru lane falls 170 feet east of a residential zone, 30 feet short of the 200-foot requirement. In order to relocate the Starbucks within the same shopping center, we will need this variance. If the variance is denied, there is no other site plan option that works to meet all other code requirements. Drive-Thru Exit Vehicle Count: When configuring a drive-thru, there are several requirements the architect needs to comply with not only from a City code standpoint, but also from a Starbucks requirement standpoint. The ultimate goal is to have the longest queue the site can provide to prevent stacking into main drive aisles and arterial roads. This proposed queue provides a nine (9) car stack with room for ten (10) additional cars before stacking into the main drive aisle within the shopping center. In addition, Starbucks requires a six (6) car stack from order point to pick-up window. The La Quinta Municipal Code 9.100.270G states “Exits from drive-through facilities shall be at least three vehicles length, shall have adequate sight-distance, and shall connect to either a signalized entry or shall be limited to right turns only.” Due to the configuration of the building, the pick-up window is based on the interior engine layout and back of house. With being such a small building with limited orientation, this is the best site plan option. No Special Privileges: How will the variance not constitute a grant of special privileges which is inconsistent with the limitations placed upon other properties in the vicinity subject to the same zoning regulations? The La Quinta Village Shopping Center is currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial. In order to provide for the development and regulation of medium to large scale commercial areas located at the intersections of 62 3 of 3 5070 N 40th St #210, Phoenix, AZ 85018 arterial highways as shown on the general plan, the La Quinta Village Shopping Center will be rezoned to Community Commercial. The Community Commercial district is intended to provide for the sale of general merchandise, hardware and building materials, food, drugs, sundries, personal services and similar goods and services to meet the needs of a multi-neighborhood area. Rezoning the shopping center to Community Commercial will allow for a broader range of proposed uses for future tenants as well. All tenants and property owners have been notified of the centers rezoning via registered mail and have provided signatures in return. The rezoning will have no effect on current tenants and/or owners. In efforts to keep the residential neighbors informed, we will be hosting a neighborhood meeting prior to any public hearings. We plan to schedule a neighborhood meeting for late October/early November. The variance we are applying for is due to the requirement of the drive-thru needing to be 200 ft. away from a Residential Zone, as well as, the exit of the drive-through be at least three vehicles length. Neither of these variances will affect the Residential Zone. No Land Use Variance: Would the request authorize a land use or activity not permitted in the applicable zoning district? If so, it cannot be approved. The La Quinta Village Shopping Center is being rezoned to Community Commercial which allows the use of a drive-thru restaurant. 63 64 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA1www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTSORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPTITLE SHEETSHEET INDEX1. INDEX2. PROPOSED SITE PLAN3. FLOOR PLAN4. ROOF PLAN5. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS6. 3D VIEWS7. 3D VIEWS8. EXISTING PHOTOS9. SITE PHOTOMETRIC STUDY10. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN11. LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN12. SHRUB IMAGESSITE DEVELOPMENT DESIGN PACKAGEDrive-Thru StarbucksPROJECT LOCATION: 50800-50981 WASHINGTON ST, LA QUINTA VILLAGE, LA QUINTA, CA.OWNER : LQ INVESTMENTS, LP STEPHAN SPERLING 949-251-8555PO BOX 492029, LOS ANGELES CA 90049ARCHITECT: ARCHITECTS ORANGE 174 S. ORANGE ST. ORANGE CA 92866 714-639-9860PEDRAM SHOKATI - PEDRAMS@ARCHITECTSORANGE.COM ATTACHMENT 6 65 66 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA2www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPSITE PLAN23578619NOPARKINGNOPARKING49EV2,790 SFCAV135BUILDING ENTRYMOPEVMOPPATH OF TRAVELPA PAPAPATRANSFORMER38'-0"26'-0"17'-0"25'-0"26'-6"9'-0"TYP.8'-11"12'-0"12'-0"3'-012"99'-0"4'-6"4'-0"R20'-0"R25'-0"26'-0"11'-314"11'-0"TYP.WASHINGTON STREET 32TYP2TYP46889101717181116511121TYP2TYP3414151562'-8"7778'-0"8'-0"9'-0"9'-0"19'-0"10"40'-10"20'-10"419620700 SFPATIO21'-10"36'-11"R25'-0"PAPATH OF TRAVELPATH OF TRAVELPATH OF TRAVEL 3'-5"RECYCLE TRASH 4±170' TORESIDENTAIL ZONEMOP MOP016'8'24'STARBUCKS LA QUINTA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, LA QUINTA, CASCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" @ 24"X36"SITE AREA:+/-29374 SF0.674 ACRESZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONEPROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIALTOTAL BUILDING AREA:2790 S.F.F.A.R.0.09BUILDING AREA & PARKING SUMMARY:REQUIRED PARKING:STARBUCKS2790 S.F. 10 / 100028 STALLSPATIO700 S.F. 10 / 10007 STALLSDT CAR QUEUE9 CAR QUEUEPARKING SUMMARYPROVIDED:STANDARD20 STALLSCOMPACT0 STALLSADA4 STALLSCAV1 STALLSEV2 STALLSREQUIRED:TOTAL:27 STALLS35 STALLSBICYCLE RACKSHORT TERM:4 SPACESSITE SUMMARYEXISTING PARKING STALL STRIPINGNEW TRASH ENCLOSURENEW PAINTED PARKING STRIPING1256789EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN11NEW PATIO SEATING12NEW BIKE RACK1310EXISTING TREES TO REMAINEXISTING CURB TO REMAIN3NEW CONCRETE CURB4KEYNOTES14NEW DT COMPONENTSPATCH AND REPAIR (E) SIDEWALKNEW PATH OF TRAVELNEW CURB CUTNEW LANDSCAPING15NEW SIDEWALKROWEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT1617EXISTING SITE RETAINING WALL18LOCATION OF NEW TRANSFORMER19EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN TO REMAIN2067 68 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA3www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPFLOOR PLAN2,79016'-2"8'-0"20'-11"11'-9"7'-10"4'-4"16'-3"9'-6"20'-51 2"3'-10"20'-512"67'-9"44'-9"18'-1"1'-3"9'-3"11'-6"3'-6"6" 2'-0"1'-6"14'-11 4"12'-2"5'-3"1'-412"14'-2"17'-0"14'-2"1'-10"2'-0"3'-0"9'-6"16'-10"7'-6" 27'-4"04'2'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" @ 24"X36"69 70 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA4www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPROOF PLAN+20'-8"T.O.RIDGE39'-2716"13'-2316"18'-114"19'-7"14'-4"36'-678"47'-61 2"23'-712"46'-10516"69'-518"36'-91116"19'-11916"7'-5" 3'-77 8"+20'-8"T.O.RIDGEHVACUNITROOFHATCHHVAC UNIT+17'-2"T.O.ROOF6'-05 8"9'-01316"4'-21116"5'-11116"4'-10516"9'-11116"+11'-0"T.O.AWNING+11'-2"T.O.CANOPY04'2'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" @ 24"X36"71 72 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA5www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSWEST ELEVATION4F9K1C8L13H7H4G10MT.O.RIDGE+20'-8"T.O.TRELLIS+11'-2"T.O.STOREFRONT+10'-0"6N12-15J1A4F4FSOUTH ELEVATION14N3H4G8L12-9K1C4FT.O.RIDGE+20'-8"T.O.CANOPY+11'-2"10MT.O.STOREFRONT+10'-0"6N1B1A11A11A15J4GNORTH ELEVATION9K8L14N3H4G13H12-1BT.O.RIDGE+20'-8"T.O.TRELLIS+11'-2"T.O.STOREFRONT+10'-0"6N1C1C11A15J6N4GEAST ELEVATION14N3H8L4G12-13H9K1DT.O.RIDGE+20'-8"T.O.CANOPY+11'-0"T.O.STOREFRONT+10'-0"1C1C11A15JEXTERIOR MATERIALSEXTERIOR COLORS & FINISHESEXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTEROMEGA DIAMOND WALL ONE COAT SYSTEMW/ CRACK ISOLATIONPRECAST STONE WALL CLADDING / TRIM / PILASTERNOT USEDANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMHOLLOW STEEL DOORPRECAST CONCRETE WALL BASE/TRIMEXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTUREPLASTER CONTROL JOINTE.P.S. CORNICE/TRIMMETAL SCREEN PANELWOOD BEAM / TRELLIS (DOUGLAS FIR)SIGNAGE(N.I.C.) PROVIDE POWERROOF TILESHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT # SW 7531 - CANVAS TANSHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT # SW 2835 - CRAFTSMAN BROWNSHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT # SW 0050 - CLASSIC LIGHT BUFFVALORI PRECAST, CREAM SANDWASHCONTACT ALLISON DILLARD (949) 355-3840CORONADO STONE, OLD COUNTRY LEDGE - COASTAL BROWN,600 SERIES SILL, LOMOCTO MATCH ARCADIA, MEDIUM BRONZE - AB-4METAL CANOPYEAGLE ROOFING, 35% BLEND "SMC 8822 SANBUENAVENTURA" & 65% 3817 LA SALLE BLEND" WITH 35%BOOSTER TILEPAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACEMODERN FORMS, BALTHUS OUTDOOR SCONCE. WS-W28521 OILRUBBED BRONZEPARASOLEIL, GEODE PATTERN - COLOR: UMBRIAWOOD COLUMN (DOUGLAS FIR)ROOF TILENOT USEDSEMI-TRANSPARENT STAIN, FLOOD PRO SERIES, LIGHT MOCHA04'8'12'73 74 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA6www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTSORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LP3D RENDERING75 76 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA7www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTSORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LP3D RENDERING77 78 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA8www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPPHOTOS79 80 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA9www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS ORANGE10/24/19LQ INVESTMENTS, LPSITE PHOTOMETRIC STUDYCompany: Architects OrangeProject Name: La QuintaLocation:www.scilights.comapp@scilights.comphone: 949/622-3000fax: 949/622-3095Applications Department: AP6Dwg No:Scale:Date: 6/4/20191/8" = 1' - 0"Photometrics-2Photometry Disclaimer:* Light loss factor (LLF) has been established at 0.912 per industry IES standard.* Refer to Calculation summary for placement of calculation points. I.E.:Workplane, Floor.* Offices, conference rooms, and open work areas are calculated at 2.5' fromA.F.F. All other areas will be calculated at floor or at the direction of the client.NOTE: PARKING LOT LIGHT POST MOUNTING HEIGHTS: 26’81 82 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA 10 www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS O RANGE 03/27/19 2,790 4 23 9 581 674 9 20'-11"13'-3"7'-10"16'-3"9'-6"21'-118"3'-1018"19'-91316"67'-9"44'-9"18'-1"1'-3"9'-1116"11'-8"3'-51116"14'-81116"9'-59 16"14'-4"2'-8"3'-0"18'-4"6"4'-212"2'-0"6"16'-6"2'-413 16"12'-2716"12'-2716"0 40'20' ARCHITECTS ORANGEwww.architectsorange.comPROPOSED FLOOR PLANLa Quinta Village, La Quinta CA. SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" @ 24"x36" 0108/15/18 JOB #:2018-252 LQ INVESTMENTS, LP PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANWASHINGTON STREETLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK SCALE 1” = 10’0 10 2052.5LICENSED LAND S C APE ARC H I TECTDIEGO F. ALE S SI LIC.#4201STATE OF C A LIFORNIA Signature Renewal Date Date 09/30/20 LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES R.O.W PROPOSED INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN PAVING PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS ON-SITE- TYP. TRUNCATED DOMES TRASH ENCLOSURE - PER ARCHITECT BIKE RACKS TRANSFORMER LOCATION EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN PAVING TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING PLANTING AREA TO REMAIN EXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN PATIO FURNITURE - PER TENANT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IRRIGATION DESIGN NOTES THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE A FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED TO MEET APPLICABLE CODES. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO BE AS EFFICIENT IN TERMS OF WATER USAGE AS POSSIBLE. WATER CONSERVATION PRODUCTS (HIGH EFFICIENCY / LOW PRECIPITATION) AND AN EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ET) WEATHER BASED CONTROL SYSTEM WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SYSTEM DESIGN. FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WATER EFFICIENCY ORDINANCE AND THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT’S LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN ORDINANCE. PLANTING DESIGN NOTES THE SELECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS BASED ON CULTURAL, AESTHETIC, AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH APPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS, FERTILIZERS, AND APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTS BASED UPON A SOILS REPORT FROM AN AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN FROM THE SITE. GROUND COVERS OR BARK MULCH SHALL FILL IN BETWEEN THE SHRUBS TO SHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SUN, EVAPOTRANSPORATION AND RUN- OFF. ALL THE FLOWER AND SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A 3” DEPTH TO HELP CONSERVE WATER, LOWER THE SOIL TEMPERATURE AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. THE SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GROW IN THEIR NATURAL FORMS. ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE CITY OF LA QUINTA GUIDELINES. GENERAL DESIGN NOTES 1. FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL ACCURATELY SHOW PLACEMENT OF TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUNDCOVERS. 2. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE AWARE OF UTILITY, SEWER, STORM DRAIN EASEMENT AND PLACE PLANTING LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY TO MEET CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED PER CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUIREMENTS. 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 3 5 644 4 4 4 7 8 9 10 10 11 1113 INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVING MANUFACTURE: DAVIS COLOR: PEBBLE #641 FINISH: MEDIUM RETARDANT TRUNCATED DOMES MAT MANUFACTURE: SAFETY STEP TD COLOR: LIGHT GRAY SIZE: 2’ x 10’ or 3’ x 5’ 83 84 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA 11 www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS O RANGE 03/27/19 2,790 4 23 9 581 674 9 20'-11"13'-3"7'-10"16'-3"9'-6"21'-118"3'-1018"19'-91316"67'-9"44'-9"18'-1"1'-3"9'-1116"11'-8"3'-51116"14'-81116"9'-59 16"14'-4"2'-8"3'-0"18'-4"6"4'-212"2'-0"6"16'-6"2'-413 16"12'-2716"12'-2716"0 40'20' ARCHITECTS ORANGEwww.architectsorange.comPROPOSED FLOOR PLANLa Quinta Village, La Quinta CA. SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" @ 24"x36" 0108/15/18 JOB #:2018-252 LQ INVESTMENTS, LP LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANWASHINGTON STREETSCALE 1” = 10’0 10 2052.5LICENSED LAND S C APE ARC H I TECTDIEGO F. ALE S SI LIC.#4201STATE OF C A LIFORNIA Signature Renewal Date Date 09/30/20 TREE LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QTY. SIZE WUCOLS DESCRIPTION PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 1 36” BOX L PARKING LOT TREE -- -- -- EXISTING TREE - ---EXISTING -- EXISTING PALM - ---EXISTING -- SHRUB LEGEND SYM BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS ACCENT SHRUBS AGAVE ‘BLUE FLAME’BLUE FLAME AGAVE 5 GAL L AGAVE ATTENUATA ‘VARIEGATA VARIEGATED FOX TAIL AGAVE 5 GAL L SMALL SHRUBS CUPHEA HYSSOPIFOLIA MEXICAN HEATHER 5 GAL M RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA ‘CLARA’INDIAN HAWTHORN CLARA 5 GAL M MEDIUM SHRUBS RUELLIA PENINSULARIS BAJA RUELLIA 5 GAL L SANTOLINA VIRENS GREEN LAVENDER COTTON 5 GAL L PERENNIAL SHRUBS PHORMIUM ‘YELLOW WAVE’YELLOW WAVE NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA APRICOT MALLOW 15 GAL VL FLOWERING SHRUBS BOUGAINVILLEA ‘BARBARA KARST’ BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLA 15 GAL M CALLISTEMON ‘LITTLE JOHN’LITTLE JOHN DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL M HEDGE BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA JAPANESE BOXWOOD 15 GAL M DODONAEA VISCOSA HOPSEED BUSH 15 GAL L GROUNDCOVER MALEPHORA CROCEA SALMON ICE PLANT 5 GAL L THYMUS SERPYLLUM ‘MAGIC CARPET’MAGIC CARPET CREEPING THYME 5 GAL M LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS TRAILING LANTANA 5 GAL M PROJECT SUMMARY OVERALL SITE AREA: 30,000 SF OVERALL LANDSCAPE AREA: 3,155 SF SITE LANDSCAPE : 10.5 % PROSOPIS CHILENSIS (CHILEAN MESQUITE) HEIGHT: 30’ SPREAD: 30’ 85 86 La Quinta Village, La Quinta CA 12 www.architectsorange.comARCHITECTS O RANGE 03/27/19 2,790 4 23 9 581 674 9 20'-11"13'-3"7'-10"16'-3"9'-6"21'-118"3'-1018"19'-91316"67'-9"44'-9"18'-1"1'-3"9'-1116"11'-8"3'-51116"14'-81116"9'-59 16"14'-4"2'-8"3'-0"18'-4"6"4'-212"2'-0"6"16'-6"2'-413 16"12'-2716"12'-2716"0 40'20' ARCHITECTS ORANGEwww.architectsorange.comPROPOSED FLOOR PLANLa Quinta Village, La Quinta CA. SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" @ 24"x36" 0108/15/18 JOB #:2018-252 LQ INVESTMENTS, LP SHRUB IMAGES LICENSED LAND S C APE ARC H I TECTDIEGO F. ALE S SI LIC.#4201STATE OF C A LIFORNIA Signature Renewal Date Date 09/30/20 AGAVE ‘BLUE FLAME’ (BLUE FLAME AGAVE) HEIGHT: 3’ - 5’ SPREAD: 3’ - 5’ AGAVE ATTENUATA ‘VARIEGATA(VARIEGATED FOX TAIL AGAVE) HEIGHT: 3’ - 4’ SPREAD: 4’ - 5’ RUELLIA PENINSULARIS (BAJA RUELLIA) HEIGHT: 3’ - 4’ SPREAD: 2’ - 3’ CUPHEA HYSSOPIFOLIA (MEXICAN HEATHER) HEIGHT: 2’ SPREAD: 2’ LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS (TRAILING LANTANA) HEIGHT: 1’ - 2’ SPREAD: 8’ - 10’ BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA (JAPANESE BOXWOOD) HEIGHT: 3’ - 5’ SPREAD: 3’ - 5’ MALEPHORA CROCEA (SALMON ICE PLANT) HEIGHT: 6” - 12” SPREAD: SPREADING PHORMIUM ‘YELLOW WAVE’ (YELLOW WAVE NEW ZEALAND FLAX) HEIGHT: 3’ - 4’ SPREAD: 4’ - 5’ DODONAEA VISCOSA (HOPSEED BUSH) HEIGHT: 12’ SPREAD: 6’ - 8’ RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA ‘CLARA’ (INDIAN HAWTHORN CLARA) HEIGHT: 4’ - 5’ SPREAD: 4’ - 5’ SANTOLINA VIRENS (GREEN LAVENDER COTTON) HEIGHT: 2’ SPREAD: 2’ SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA (APRICOT MALLOW) HEIGHT: 2’ - 3’ SPREAD: 2’ - 3’ THYMUS SERPYLLUM ‘MAGIC CARPET’ (MAGIC CARPET CREEPING THYME) HEIGHT: 1’ - 2’ SPREAD: 12” - 15” CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS ‘LITTLE JOHN’ (LITTLE JOHN DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH) HEIGHT: 3’ SPREAD: 5’ BOUGAINVILLEA ‘BARBARA KARST’ (BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLEA) HEIGHT: 3’ - 5’ SPREAD: 3’ - 5’ 87 88 02-02-18 03/29/19 A B C D G F I H J E A BC D E F G H J I ATTACHMENT 7 AAA AATTACHMENT 789 90 8/21/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo3.docx)   CARLSBAD FRESNO IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO 20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, California  92614     949.553.0666     www.lsa.net  MEMORANDUM  DATE: August 21, 2019  TO: Bryan McKinney, City of La Quinta Engineer  FROM: Dean Arizabal, LSA  SUBJECT: La Quinta Starbucks – Focused Traffic Impact Analysis  LSA is pleased to present this Focused Traffic Impact Analysis memorandum for the proposed  Starbucks at the La Quinta Village Shopping Center in La Quinta, California (project). The purpose of  this analysis is to disclose the potential traffic‐related impacts of this project on the surrounding  roadway network. To assess the effects of the project on the existing circulation system, LSA has  conducted an analysis consistent with the City of La Quinta (City) Engineering Bulletin 06‐13 for  Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (July 23, 2015) and the Traffic Impact Analysis Scope (approved by  the City on May 28, 2019).   PROJECT DESCRIPTION  The proposed project includes the relocation of the existing Starbucks at the La Quinta Village  Shopping Center to a new facility just south and across an internal drive aisle within the same  shopping center. In addition to the relocation, the new Starbucks would have a drive‐through (the  current Starbucks does not have a drive‐through). Figure 1 shows the site plan. All figures are  provided in Attachment A.  The proposed project is within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center at the northwest corner of the  intersection of Washington Drive/Calle Tampico. The retail center is bound by residential uses to the  north and west, Calle Tampico and the La Quinta Civic Center to the south, and Washington Drive  and residential uses to the east.   METHODOLOGY  Study Area  Per the City‐approved scope, the project study area consists of the following locations:  Intersections  1.Washington Street/Full‐Access Driveway 2.Washington Street/Right‐In, Right‐Out (RIRO) Driveway 3.Washington Street/Calle Tampico 4.Full‐Access Driveway/Calle Tampico ATTACHMENT 8 91 8/9/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx) 2 Roadway Segments 1. Washington Street north of Calle Tampico 2. Calle Tampico west of Washington Street Based on discussion with City staff, Calle Tampico west of Washington Street (study area roadway segment 2) will be revised from its current four-lane Primary classification (two eastbound and two westbound through lanes) to a two-lane Modified Secondary roadway (one eastbound and one westbound through lane). As a result of this roadway revision, the two eastbound and two westbound through lanes will be reduced to one through lane in each direction at the Full-Access Driveway/Calle Tampico (study area intersection 4). City staff has indicated that the Calle Tampico road diet will soon be underway and is anticipated to be completed by Winter 2019. As such, these circulation changes have been assumed under existing conditions for purposes of this analysis. Figure 2 illustrates the project location with the study area intersections, roadways, and geometrics (including the Calle Tampico road diet). Intersection Level of Service Methodology In accordance with the City’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13, the study area intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology. The Synchro 10 computer software was used to determine the level of service (LOS) based on the existing intersection geometries. The HCM worksheets are provided in Attachment B. The HCM methodology calculates the average delay experienced by all vehicles at an intersection. The resulting calculation of average delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection is then used to determine the LOS at that location. LOS A represents free-flow activity, and LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effects of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and maneuverability on roadway and intersection operations. The relationship between LOS and the delay (in seconds) at intersections is as follows: Level of Service Delay in Seconds (Signalized) Delay in Seconds (Unsignalized) A < 10.0 < 10.0 B > 10.0 and < 20.0 > 10.0 and < 15.0 C > 20.0 and < 35.0 > 15.0 and < 25.0 D > 35.0 and < 55.0 > 25.0 and < 35.0 E > 55.0 and < 80.0 > 35.0 and < 50.0 F > 80.0 > 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board 2017) Roadway Analysis Methodology The study area roadway segments were assessed using a volume-to-capacity (v/c) analysis. The existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes are divided by the City’s maximum daily capacities to calculate the v/c ratio. The maximum daily capacity of a roadway is dependent on its classification. 92 8/9/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx) 3 The following table shows the roadway capacity standards as stated in the City’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13. Classification Lane Configuration Average Daily Traffic Capacity Level of Service E Major 6 lanes, divided 61,100 Modified Secondary 2 lanes, divided 19,000 Primary 4 lanes, divided 42,600 Source: City of La Quinta Engineering Bulletin 06-13 (City of La Quinta 2015). Performance Criteria The City considers LOS D to be the recognized standard for all intersections and roadway segments. A significant project impact for a signalized intersection is defined by an increase of 2 seconds of delay to a signalized intersection operating at LOS E or an increase of 1 second of delay to a signalized intersection operating at LOS F. A significant project impact for an unsignalized intersection is defined by an increase of 3 seconds of delay or more for any movement at a two-way stop-controlled intersection operating at LOS E or F. A significant project impact for a roadway segment is defined by an increase of 0.02 or more to the v/c ratio of a roadway segment operating at LOS E or F. If there is a significant project impact, mitigation measures must be identified. PROJECT TRAFFIC Trip Generation In accordance with the City’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13, trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017) were used to generate daily, a.m. peak-hour, and p.m. peak-hour trips for the proposed project. In addition, a pass-by trip reduction (50 percent) has been applied to the project based on the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition (2017). Pass-by trips are made by drivers already on an adjacent/nearby roadway and therefore are not additive trips (e.g., stopped by the coffee shop on the way to work from home or vice versa).Table A summarizes the project trip generation. As shown in Table A, the project is expected to generate 48 net new trips (24 inbound and 24 outbound) during the a.m. peak hour and 34 net new trips (18 inbound and 16 outbound) during the p.m. peak hour. It should be noted that the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not have trip rates for a coffee shop without drive-through (e.g., existing Starbucks to be removed). As such, the net new daily trips of 1,144 ADT have been assumed for purposes of this analysis. 93 8/9/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx) 4 Table A: Project Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Unit ADT In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates1 Coffee Shop with Drive-Through TSF 820.38 45.38 43.61 88.99 21.69 21.69 43.38 Coffee Shop without Drive-Through TSF - 51.58 49.56 101.14 18.16 18.15 36.31 Project Trip Generation Coffee Shop with Drive-Through 2.790 TSF 2,289 126 122 248 61 60 121 Pass-By Reductions2 (1,145) (63) (61) (124) (30) (30) (60) Total 1,144 63 61 124 31 30 61 Existing Trip Generation Coffee Shop without Drive-Through 1.500 TSF - 78 74 152 27 27 54 Pass-By Reductions2 - (39) (37) (76) (14) (13) (27) Total - 39 37 76 13 14 27 Net Trip Generation (Project-Existing) - 24 24 48 18 16 34 Source: LSA Associates, Inc. (June 2019). 1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). Land Use Code 937 – Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window Land Use Code 936 – Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window (ITE does not have an ADT rate for this land use code) 2 Pass-by reductions (50 percent) developed from the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition (2017). ADT = average daily traffic TSF = thousand square feet Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution defines the regional percentage origins/destinations for a project. Based on the project’s location, project trips were distributed 20 percent north via Washington Street, 20 percent south via Washington Street, 10 percent east via Calle Tampico, and 50 percent west via Calle Tampico. Figures 3 and 4 show the project trip distribution and assignment, respectively. EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Traffic Volumes In order to establish existing conditions, an independent traffic count company (Counts Unlimited) conducted traffic counts at the study area intersections and roadway segments. Intersection turning-movement volumes for the study area intersections were collected on Thursday, May 30, 2019, during the a.m. peak hour (between 6:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m.) and the p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.). The 24-hour ADT volumes were collected the same day at the study area roadway segments. All existing traffic counts are provided in Attachment C. La Quinta historically experiences variations in seasonal population. Per the City’s Engineering Bulletin 06-13, traffic counts conducted in May are increased by 10 percent to account for these cyclical fluctuations. As such, the existing peak-hour and ADT counts conducted in May 2019 have been increased by 10 percent for purposes of this analysis. Figure 5 illustrates the existing intersection volumes (including the 10 percent adjustment). The existing plus project volumes at the study area locations were calculated by adding project trips to the existing traffic volumes. Figure 6 illustrates the existing plus project intersection volumes. 94 8/9/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx) 5 Intersection Level of Service Table B presents the results of the peak-hour LOS analysis of the study area intersections. As this table indicates, all study area intersections currently operate at satisfactory LOS. With the implementation of the proposed project, all study area intersections are expected to continue operating at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the project can be implemented under existing conditions with no significant peak-hour intersection impacts. Table B: Existing Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Existing Baseline Existing Plus Project Δ Delay Significant Impact? AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS AM PM 1 Washington Street/ Full-Access Driveway 5.2 A 5.1 A 5.2 A 5.1 A 0.0 0.0 No 2 Washington Street/ RIRO Driveway 12.2 B 15.1 C 12.3 B 15.3 C 0.1 0.2 No 3 Washington Street/ Calle Tampico 15.2 B 19.3 B 15.3 B 19.4 B 0.1 0.1 No 4 Full-Access Driveway/ Calle Tampico 18.4 C 25.8 D 19.2 C 27.1 D 0.8 1.3 No Source: LSA Associates, Inc. (August 2019). Delay is reported in seconds. LOS = level of service RIRO = right-in, right-out Δ = change in Roadway Segment Level of Service Table C presents the ADT volumes and v/c ratios for the study area roadway segments. As this table indicates, all study area roadway segments currently operate at satisfactory LOS. With the implementation of the project, the study area roadway segments are expected to continue operating at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the project can be implemented without creating significant impacts on the surrounding study area roadway segments under existing conditions. Table C: Existing Roadway Level of Service Summary Roadway Class Capacity Existing Baseline Project ADT Existing Plus Project Δ V/C Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS 1 Washington north of Calle Tampico Major 61,100 22,380 0.37 A 229 22,609 0.37 A 0.00 No 2 Calle Tampico west of Washington Modified Secondary 19,000 9,797 0.52 A 572 10,369 0.55 A 0.03 No Source: LSA Associates, Inc. (August 2019). ADT = average daily traffic LOS = level of service v/c = volume-to-capacity ratio Δ = change in 95 8/9/19 (P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx) 6 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING ANALYSIS The proposed Starbucks drive-through queuing storage was evaluated to ensure potential queues would not spillback onto public streets. LSA reviewed existing queuing data of a Starbucks drive- through in Lake Forest, California to determine the potential for stacking at the proposed Starbucks drive-through within the La Quinta Village Shopping Center, provided in Attachment D. Based on this information, a maximum queue of 12 vehicles was identified during the morning commute periods between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. As shown on Figure 7, the proposed Starbucks drive-through lane would provide enough distance for nine vehicles between the service window and the parking lot (six vehicles between the service window and the order board and three vehicles between the order board and the entrance of the drive-through lane). An additional eight vehicles (17 total vehicles) could be accommodated before vehicles would queue onto the main drive aisle, but would block five parking spaces within the parking lot parallel to Washington Street. Appropriate signage will be provided on site to direct customers through the southern drive aisle to the new drive-through. If the maximum observed queue of 12 vehicles were to occur at the project site, the drive-through storage area of nine vehicles could be exceeded by three vehicles during the periods of peak demand. Vehicles 10, 11, and 12 would block only four parking spaces along the internal row of surface parking adjacent to Washington Street. Although four parking spaces may not be accessible during the morning peak periods of Starbucks drive-through demand, the maximum queue would be contained within the parking lot and would not impede traffic along the main drive aisle of the shopping center or the public streets. Furthermore, exiting vehicles wishing to leave via Washington Avenue turn right and have 138 feet of stacking prior to the public right-of-way. Adequate sight distance is provided at the service exit and throughout the La Quinta Village Shopping Center leading out to Washington Avenue. The exit at Washington Avenue is a right-turn only driveway. CONCLUSION Based on this analysis, the proposed project is not expected to significantly impact the surrounding roadway network or the internal circulation system. If you have any questions, please call me at (949) 553-0666. Attachments: A: Figures 1–7 B: Existing Counts C: HCM Worksheets D: Lake Forest Starbucks Drive-Through Queuing Survey 96 F OCUSED T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS A UGUST 2019 L A Q UINTA S TARBUCKS L A Q UINTA , C ALIFORNIA P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx «08/09/19» ATTACHMENT A FIGURES 1–7 97 SOURCE Architects Orange: FEET 30150 N FIGURE 1 Site Plan I:\LQI1901\G\Site Plan.cdr (8/21/2019) La Quinta Starbucks 98 1 Washington St/Full-Access Dwy 2 Washington St/RIRO Dwy 3 Washington St/Calle Tampico 4 Full-Access Dwy/Calle Tampico FIGURE 2 LEGEND Signal Stop Sign La Quinta Starbucks Protected Right Turn Project Location and Study Area Geometricsadaccceccc wvv wvv xvvt Note: Geometry considers new roadway improvements along Calle Tampico adaabeacce adf wtad P P P:\LQI1901\xls\figures\geo.xlsx (8/9/2019)99 10 30 (20)(30)50  1 Washington St/Full‐Access Dwy 2 Washington St/RIRO Dwy 3 Washington St/Calle Tampico 4 Full‐Access Dwy/Calle Tampico FIGURE 3 LEGEND XXX (YYY)Inbound (Outbound) %  La Quinta Starbucks  Project Trip Distribution(10)(20)20 (50)20 20 P:\LQI1901\xls\figures\trip dist.xlsx (6/26/2019)100 2 / 2 7 / 5 5 / 3 7 / 5 12 / 9  1 Washington St/Full‐Access Dwy 2 Washington St/RIRO Dwy 3 Washington St/Calle Tampico 4 Full‐Access Dwy/Calle Tampico FIGURE 4 LEGEND XXX / YYY AM / PM Volume  La Quinta Starbucks  Project Trip Assignment2 / 25 / 35 / 412 / 85 / 35 / 4P:\LQI1901\xls\figures\trip assign.xlsx (6/26/2019)101 47 / 30 9 / 066 / 30 392 / 442  41 / 42 12 / 9 66 / 42 15 / 18 173 / 330 61 / 62  10 / 9 41 / 68 221 / 407  23 / 40 4 / 4  1 Washington St/Full‐Access Dwy 2 Washington St/RIRO Dwy 3 Washington St/Calle Tampico 4 Full‐Access Dwy/Calle Tampico FIGURE 5 LEGEND XXX / YYY AM / PM Volume  La Quinta Starbucks  Existing Peak‐Hour Volumes57 / 45717 / 1164309 / 403864 / 7679 / 1048 / 31646 / 41967 / 251 / 61 / 03 / 7871 / 7987 / 14715 / 11082 / 102 / 059 / 6119 / 39403 / 663P:\LQI1901\xls\figures\existing.xlsx (6/26/2019)102 47 / 30 16 / 568 / 32 392 / 442  41 / 42 12 / 9 71 / 45 22 / 23 173 / 330 73 / 71  10 / 9 41 / 68 221 / 407  23 / 40 4 / 4  1 Washington St/Full‐Access Dwy 2 Washington St/RIRO Dwy 3 Washington St/Calle Tampico 4 Full‐Access Dwy/Calle Tampico FIGURE 6 LEGEND XXX / YYY AM / PM Volume  La Quinta Starbucks  Existing Plus Project Peak‐Hour Volumes57 / 45722 / 1168309 / 403864 / 7679 / 1053 / 34646 / 41967 / 251 / 61 / 03 / 7871 / 79812 / 18715 / 11082 / 102 / 071 / 6921 / 41408 / 666P:\LQI1901\xls\figures\existing+project.xlsx (6/26/2019)103 - Potential Parking Spaces Blocked (5) 14151617 13 12 11 10 Main Drive Aisle Main Drive Aisle SOURCE Architects Orange: FEET 30150 N FIGURE 7 Potential Drive-Through Queuing I:\LQI1901\G\Queuing.cdr (8/21/2019) La Quinta Starbucks LEGEND - Potential Additional Drive-Through Vehicles (8) 104 F OCUSED T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS A UGUST 2019 L A Q UINTA S TARBUCKS L A Q UINTA , C ALIFORNIA P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx «08/09/19» ATTACHMENT B HCM WORKSHEETS 105 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Full-Access Dwy & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 66 10 9 864 717 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 66 10 9 864 717 57 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 72 11 10 939 779 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 156 139 24 2828 1742 138 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.55 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 5274 4992 382 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 11 10 939 549 292 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1702 1702 1802 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.2 0.1 2.5 3.1 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.2 0.1 2.5 3.1 3.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 156 139 24 2828 1229 651 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.08 0.42 0.33 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1278 1137 355 3662 2441 1292 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.9 10.5 12.3 3.1 6.1 6.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.2 11.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.0 10.8 23.5 3.1 6.4 6.6 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 83 949 841 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.7 3.3 6.4 Approach LOS B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.4 6.7 4.8 13.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 3.0 2.1 5.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.5 0.1 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.2 HCM 6th LOS A 106 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 15 0 871 715 7 Future Vol, veh/h 0 15 0 871 715 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 16 0 947 777 8 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 393 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 518 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 518 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.2 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 518 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 12.2 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - 107 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Calle Tampico & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 173 41 23 41 66 47 48 646 67 19 403 309 Future Volume (veh/h) 173 41 23 41 66 47 48 646 67 19 403 309 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 172 68 25 45 72 51 52 702 73 21 438 336 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 331 298 253 83 116 82 92 1869 193 45 1318 588 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.03 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 1870 1585 1781 1019 722 1781 4702 485 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 172 68 25 45 0 123 52 507 268 21 438 336 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1740 1781 1702 1783 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.0 3.3 1.4 5.1 5.2 0.6 4.3 8.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.0 3.3 1.4 5.1 5.2 0.6 4.3 8.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 331 298 253 83 0 197 92 1353 709 45 1318 588 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.23 0.10 0.54 0.00 0.62 0.56 0.37 0.38 0.46 0.33 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 367 694 588 184 0 646 184 1353 709 184 1318 588 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.0 17.8 17.4 22.6 0.0 20.5 22.5 10.4 10.4 23.3 11.0 12.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.4 0.2 5.3 0.0 3.2 5.3 0.8 1.5 7.2 0.7 4.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.6 1.4 1.7 0.3 1.3 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.2 18.2 17.6 27.9 0.0 23.7 27.7 11.1 11.9 30.6 11.6 16.2 LnGrp LOS C B B C A C C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 265 168 827 795 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.8 24.9 12.4 14.1 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.7 23.8 6.8 12.2 7.0 22.5 9.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 7.2 3.2 3.5 3.4 10.2 4.2 5.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.2 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 108 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Calle Tampico/Calle Tampico & Full-Access Driveway 08/01/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 221 4 12 392 9 1 1 3 2 2 59 Future Vol, veh/h 61 221 4 12 392 9 1 1 3 2 2 59 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 98 - - 91 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 66 240 4 13 426 10 1 1 3 2 2 64 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 436 0 0 244 0 0 864 836 242 833 833 431 Stage 1 - - - - - - 374 374 - 457 457 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 490 462 - 376 376 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1124 - - 1322 - - 274 303 797 288 304 624 Stage 1 - - - - - - 647 618 - 583 568 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 560 565 - 645 616 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1124 - - 1322 - - 232 282 797 271 283 624 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 232 282 - 271 283 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 609 582 - 549 562 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 496 559 - 604 580 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0.2 13.5 11.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)430 1124 - - 1322 - - 271 600 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.059 - - 0.01 - - 0.008 0.111 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.5 8.4 - - 7.8 - - 18.4 11.7 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - - 0 - - 0 0.4 109 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Full-Access Dwy & Washington Street 08/01/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 42 9 10 767 1164 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 42 9 10 767 1164 45 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 10 11 834 1265 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 112 100 26 3179 2273 88 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.62 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 5274 5212 195 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 10 11 834 854 460 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1702 1702 1835 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.2 0.2 2.1 5.3 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.2 0.2 2.1 5.3 5.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 112 100 26 3179 1534 827 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.10 0.42 0.26 0.56 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1121 997 311 3213 2142 1155 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.9 12.6 14.0 2.4 5.8 5.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.4 10.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.3 13.1 24.5 2.5 6.1 6.4 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 56 845 1314 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.9 2.8 6.2 Approach LOS B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.3 6.3 4.9 17.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 2.7 2.2 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.9 0.1 0.0 5.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.1 HCM 6th LOS A 110 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 798 1108 14 Future Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 798 1108 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 20 0 867 1204 15 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 610 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 375 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 375 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 375 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.052 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.1 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - - 111 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Calle Tampico & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 330 68 40 42 30 30 31 419 25 39 663 403 Future Volume (veh/h) 330 68 40 42 30 30 31 419 25 39 663 403 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 324 123 43 46 33 33 34 455 27 42 721 438 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 371 295 250 85 87 87 68 1849 109 80 1356 605 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.04 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 1870 1585 1781 858 858 1781 4932 290 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 324 123 43 46 0 66 34 313 169 42 721 438 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1716 1781 1702 1818 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 2.8 1.1 1.2 0.0 1.7 0.9 3.0 3.1 1.1 7.6 11.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 2.8 1.1 1.2 0.0 1.7 0.9 3.0 3.1 1.1 7.6 11.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 371 295 250 85 0 174 68 1276 681 80 1356 605 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.42 0.17 0.54 0.00 0.38 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.53 0.53 0.72 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 371 701 594 185 0 643 185 1276 681 185 1356 605 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.2 18.2 17.5 22.3 0.0 20.2 22.7 10.3 10.3 22.4 11.5 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.9 0.9 0.3 5.3 0.0 1.4 5.7 0.5 0.9 5.3 1.5 7.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 1.1 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.9 1.0 0.5 2.3 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.1 19.2 17.8 27.6 0.0 21.5 28.3 10.8 11.2 27.8 13.0 20.1 LnGrp LOS D B B C A C C B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 490 112 516 1201 Approach Delay, s/veh 33.5 24.0 12.1 16.1 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 22.5 6.8 12.1 6.3 22.8 9.5 9.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 5.1 3.2 4.8 2.9 13.3 6.3 3.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 112 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Calle Tampico & Full-Access Driveway 08/01/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 62 407 4 9 442 0 1 1 3 10 0 61 Future Vol, veh/h 62 407 4 9 442 0 1 1 3 10 0 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 98 - - 91 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 442 4 10 480 0 1 1 3 11 0 66 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 480 0 0 446 0 0 1111 1078 444 1080 1080 480 Stage 1 - - - - - - 578 578 - 500 500 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 533 500 - 580 580 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1082 - - 1114 - - 186 219 614 196 218 586 Stage 1 - - - - - - 501 501 - 553 543 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 531 543 - 500 500 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1082 - - 1114 - - 156 204 614 184 203 586 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 156 204 - 184 203 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 470 - 519 538 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 467 538 - 465 469 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0.2 16.9 13.9 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)309 1082 - - 1114 - - 184 586 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.062 - - 0.009 - - 0.059 0.113 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 8.5 - - 8.3 - - 25.8 11.9 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.4 113 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Full-Access Dwy & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 10 9 864 722 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 10 9 864 722 57 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 77 11 10 939 785 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 162 145 24 2823 1744 137 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.55 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 5274 4995 379 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 11 10 939 553 294 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1702 1702 1802 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.2 0.1 2.5 3.1 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.2 0.1 2.5 3.1 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 162 145 24 2823 1230 651 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.08 0.42 0.33 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1268 1129 352 3636 2424 1283 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.9 10.5 12.4 3.1 6.2 6.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.2 11.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.1 10.7 23.6 3.2 6.4 6.7 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 88 949 847 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.8 3.4 6.5 Approach LOS B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.5 6.8 4.8 13.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 3.0 2.1 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.5 0.2 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.2 HCM 6th LOS A 114 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 22 0 871 715 12 Future Vol, veh/h 0 22 0 871 715 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 24 0 947 777 13 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 395 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 516 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 516 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 516 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.046 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 12.3 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - 115 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Calle Tampico & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 173 41 23 41 68 47 53 646 67 21 408 309 Future Volume (veh/h) 173 41 23 41 68 47 53 646 67 21 408 309 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 172 68 25 45 74 51 58 702 73 23 443 336 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 329 299 254 83 118 81 99 1867 193 49 1310 584 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.40 0.40 0.03 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 1870 1585 1781 1031 711 1781 4702 485 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 172 68 25 45 0 125 58 507 268 23 443 336 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1742 1781 1702 1783 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.0 3.3 1.6 5.1 5.2 0.6 4.4 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.0 3.3 1.6 5.1 5.2 0.6 4.4 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 329 299 254 83 0 199 99 1351 708 49 1310 584 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.23 0.10 0.54 0.00 0.63 0.58 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.34 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 365 690 584 182 0 642 182 1351 708 182 1310 584 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.1 17.9 17.5 22.8 0.0 20.6 22.5 10.4 10.4 23.4 11.1 12.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.4 0.2 5.3 0.0 3.2 5.3 0.8 1.5 6.9 0.7 4.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.7 1.5 1.7 0.3 1.3 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.4 18.3 17.7 28.1 0.0 23.8 27.8 11.2 12.0 30.3 11.8 16.4 LnGrp LOS C B B C A C C B B C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 265 170 833 802 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 25.0 12.6 14.3 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.8 23.9 6.8 12.3 7.2 22.5 9.0 10.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 7.2 3.2 3.5 3.6 10.3 4.2 5.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 116 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Calle Tampico & Full-Access Driveway 08/01/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project AM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 221 4 12 392 16 1 1 3 2 2 71 Future Vol, veh/h 73 221 4 12 392 16 1 1 3 2 2 71 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 98 - - 91 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 79 240 4 13 426 17 1 1 3 2 2 77 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 443 0 0 244 0 0 900 869 242 863 863 435 Stage 1 - - - - - - 400 400 - 461 461 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 500 469 - 402 402 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1117 - - 1322 - - 259 290 797 275 292 621 Stage 1 - - - - - - 626 602 - 581 565 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 553 561 - 625 600 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1117 - - 1322 - - 212 267 797 256 269 621 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 212 267 - 256 269 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 582 559 - 540 559 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 555 - 577 557 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0.2 13.9 12.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)409 1117 - - 1322 - - 256 600 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.071 - - 0.01 - - 0.008 0.132 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.9 8.5 - - 7.8 - - 19.2 11.9 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - - 0 - - 0 0.5 117 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Full-Access Dwy & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 9 10 767 1168 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 9 10 767 1168 45 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 10 11 834 1270 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 116 104 26 3174 2272 88 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.62 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 5274 5213 195 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 10 11 834 857 462 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1585 1781 1702 1702 1835 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.2 0.2 2.1 5.3 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.2 0.2 2.1 5.3 5.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 116 104 26 3174 1533 827 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.10 0.42 0.26 0.56 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1115 993 310 3197 2132 1149 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.9 12.6 14.0 2.5 5.8 5.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.4 10.5 0.0 0.3 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.3 13.0 24.5 2.5 6.1 6.4 LnGrp LOS B B C A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 59 845 1319 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.9 2.8 6.2 Approach LOS B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.4 6.4 4.9 17.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 2.8 2.2 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.9 0.1 0.0 5.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.1 HCM 6th LOS A 118 HCM 6th TWSC 2: Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 23 0 798 1108 18 Future Vol, veh/h 0 23 0 798 1108 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 25 0 867 1204 20 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 612 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 374 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 374 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.3 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 374 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.067 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.3 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - - 119 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Calle Tampico & Washington Street 06/27/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 330 68 40 42 32 30 34 419 25 41 666 403 Future Volume (veh/h) 330 68 40 42 32 30 34 419 25 41 666 403 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 324 123 43 46 35 33 37 455 27 45 724 438 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 370 295 250 85 90 85 72 1844 108 84 1352 603 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.05 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 3563 1870 1585 1781 885 835 1781 4932 290 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 324 123 43 46 0 68 37 313 169 45 724 438 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1720 1781 1702 1818 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 2.9 1.1 1.2 0.0 1.8 1.0 3.1 3.1 1.2 7.6 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 2.9 1.1 1.2 0.0 1.8 1.0 3.1 3.1 1.2 7.6 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 370 295 250 85 0 174 72 1273 680 84 1352 603 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.42 0.17 0.54 0.00 0.39 0.51 0.25 0.25 0.54 0.54 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 370 699 593 185 0 643 185 1273 680 185 1352 603 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.3 18.3 17.6 22.4 0.0 20.2 22.6 10.4 10.4 22.4 11.6 12.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.3 0.9 0.3 5.3 0.0 1.4 5.5 0.5 0.9 5.3 1.5 7.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 1.1 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.9 1.0 0.5 2.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.5 19.2 17.9 27.7 0.0 21.7 28.2 10.9 11.3 27.7 13.1 20.3 LnGrp LOS D B B C A C C B B C B C Approach Vol, veh/h 490 114 519 1207 Approach Delay, s/veh 33.8 24.1 12.2 16.3 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 22.5 6.8 12.1 6.5 22.8 9.5 9.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 5.1 3.2 4.9 3.0 13.4 6.3 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 120 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Calle Tampico & Full-Access Driveway 08/01/2019 La Quinta Starbucks (LQI1901) Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 10 Report LSA, AB Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 71 407 4 9 442 5 6 0 7 10 0 69 Future Vol, veh/h 71 407 4 9 442 5 6 0 7 10 0 69 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 98 - - 91 - - - - - 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 77 442 4 10 480 5 7 0 8 11 0 75 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 485 0 0 446 0 0 1138 1103 444 1105 1103 483 Stage 1 - - - - - - 598 598 - 503 503 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 540 505 - 602 600 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1078 - - 1114 - - 179 211 614 188 211 584 Stage 1 - - - - - - 489 491 - 551 541 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 540 - 486 490 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1078 - - 1114 - - 146 194 614 174 194 584 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 146 194 - 174 194 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 454 456 - 512 536 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 454 535 - 446 455 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0.2 20.4 14 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)248 1078 - - 1114 - - 174 584 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.072 - - 0.009 - - 0.062 0.128 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.4 8.6 - - 8.3 - - 27.1 12.1 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.4 121 F OCUSED T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS A UGUST 2019 L A Q UINTA S TARBUCKS L A Q UINTA , C ALIFORNIA P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx «08/09/19» ATTACHMENT C EXISTING COUNTS 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 F OCUSED T RAFFIC I MPACT A NALYSIS A UGUST 2019 L A Q UINTA S TARBUCKS L A Q UINTA , C ALIFORNIA P:\LQI1901\doc\traffic analysis memo2.docx «08/09/19» ATTACHMENT D LAKE FOREST STARBUCKS DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING SURVEY 133 Location:20790 Lake Forest Dr Date:5/7/2015 City:Lake Forest Day:Thursday Max Queue #1 Max Queue #2 Cashier Window to Menu Board Past Menu Board 6:00 AM 3 1 1 6:05 AM 2 1 2 6:10 AM 3 3 2 6:15 AM 1 2 2 6:20 AM 3 3 5 6:25 AM 4 3 4 6:30 AM 4 4 5 6:35 AM 4 5 5 6:40 AM 4 6 4 6:45 AM 4 7 5 6:50 AM 4 7 4 6:55 AM 4 8 4 7:00 AM 4 8 4 7:05 AM 4 8 7 7:10 AM 4 7 7 7:15 AM 4 7 5 7:20 AM 4 8 8 7:25 AM 4 8 4 7:30 AM 4 8 4 7:35 AM 4 8 5 7:40 AM 4 7 7 7:45 AM 4 8 4 7:50 AM 4 8 4 7:55 AM 4 8 5 8:00 AM 4 8 5 8:05 AM 4 8 7 8:10 AM 4 8 6 8:15 AM 4 8 6 8:20 AM 4 8 5 8:25 AM 4 8 8 8:30 AM 4 8 5 8:35 AM 4 8 5 8:40 AM 4 8 5 8:45 AM 4 8 4 8:50 AM 4 8 4 8:55 AM 4 8 4 TIME QUEUE STUDY Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Total # of Vehicles Going through Drive- Thru 134