Noise Report Comments 2020-02-24 Attachment
The Wave – Coral Mountain
NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF LA QUINTA
PREPARED BY:
Bill Lawson, PE, INCE
blawson@urbanxroads.com
(949) 336-5979
DECEMBER 3, 2019
12642-02 Noise Study
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
ii
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... III
APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................ IV
LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. V
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... V
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. VI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1
Off-Site Traffic Noise Analysis .................................................................................................................. 1
On-Site Traffic Noise Analysis .................................................................................................................. 2
Operational Noise Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 3
Construction Noise Analysis .................................................................................................................... 4
Construction Vibration Analysis .............................................................................................................. 4
Summary of CEQA Significance Findings ................................................................................................. 4
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 7
1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................. 7
1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 7
2 FUNDAMENTALS ....................................................................................................................... 11
2.1 Range of Noise ............................................................................................................................ 11
2.2 Noise Descriptors ........................................................................................................................ 12
2.3 Sound Propagation ...................................................................................................................... 12
2.4 Noise Control .............................................................................................................................. 13
2.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation ........................................................................................................... 13
2.6 Land Use Compatibility With Noise ............................................................................................ 13
2.7 Community Response to Noise ................................................................................................... 14
2.8 Exposure to High Noise Levels .................................................................................................... 15
2.9 Vibration ..................................................................................................................................... 15
3 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................................. 19
3.1 State of California Noise Requirements ...................................................................................... 19
3.2 State of California Building Code ................................................................................................ 19
3.3 City of La Quinta General Plan Environmental Hazards Element ............................................... 19
3.4 Operational Noise Standards ...................................................................................................... 22
3.5 Construction Noise Standards..................................................................................................... 22
3.6 Vibration Standards .................................................................................................................... 23
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 25
4.1 CEQA Guidelines Not Further Analyzed ...................................................................................... 25
4.2 Noise-Sensitive Receivers ........................................................................................................... 25
4.3 Significance Criteria Summary .................................................................................................... 27
5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ................................................................................... 29
5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria ........................................................................................ 29
5.2 Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................................... 29
5.3 Noise Measurement Results ....................................................................................................... 30
6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES.................................................................................................... 35
6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model ........................................................................................ 35
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
iv
6.2 Vibration Assessment ................................................................................................................. 40
7 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS ............................................................................ 41
7.1 Traffic Noise Contours ................................................................................................................ 41
7.2 Existing Conditions Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions .................................................... 54
7.3 EA Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions .............................................................................. 56
7.4 EAC 2021 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions ................................................................... 58
7.5 EAC 2023 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions ................................................................... 60
7.6 EAC 2026 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions ................................................................... 62
7.7 General Plan 2040 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions ..................................................... 64
8 ON-SITE NOISE IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 67
8.1 Exterior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................................ 67
8.2 Interior Noise Analysis ................................................................................................................ 68
9 SENSITIVE RECEIVER LOCATIONS ............................................................................................... 71
10 OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS ................................................................................................. 75
10.1 Reference Noise Levels ............................................................................................................... 75
10.2 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model ................................................................................................. 77
10.3 Project Operational Noise Levels ................................................................................................ 78
10.4 Typical Project Operational Noise Level Contributions .............................................................. 80
11 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ......................................................................................................... 83
11.1 Construction Noise Levels ........................................................................................................... 83
11.2 Construction Reference Noise Levels ......................................................................................... 83
11.3 Construction Noise Analysis ........................................................................................................ 86
11.4 Construction Noise Level Compliance ........................................................................................ 92
11.5 Construction Vibration Impacts .................................................................................................. 93
12 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 95
13 CERTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................... 97
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE
APPENDIX 5.1: STUDY AREA PHOTOS
APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX 7.1: OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS
APPENDIX 8.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX 10.1: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
v
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT ES-A: SUMMARY OF ON-SITE RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 6
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP .............................................................................................................. 8
EXHIBIT 1-B: PRELIMINARY LAND USE PLAN ........................................................................................ 9
EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS .................................................................................................. 11
EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION ............................................................................. 15
EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION .......................................................... 17
EXHIBIT 3-A: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS .......................... 21
EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS ............................................................................... 33
EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS ................................................................................................... 73
EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS .................................................................. 79
EXHIBIT 10-B: UNMITIGATED PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS ................................ 82
EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ........................................................................................... 85
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 5
TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS ................................................................................... 22
TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE OF NOISE IMPACTS AT NOISE-SENSITIVE RECEIVERS .................................. 26
TABLE 4-2: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY .................................................................................. 28
TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS .......................................................... 32
TABLE 6-1: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS................................................................................... 37
TABLE 6-2: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................. 38
TABLE 6-3: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS ........................................................................................... 39
TABLE 6-4: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) ................................... 39
TABLE 6-5: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS ................................................................................... 39
TABLE 6-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ........................................ 40
TABLE 7-1: EXISTING 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ................................. 42
TABLE 7-2: EXISTING 2019 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ........................................ 43
TABLE 7-3: EA WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ................................................... 44
TABLE 7-4: EA WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS .......................................................... 45
TABLE 7-5: EAC 2021 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ......................................... 46
TABLE 7-6: EAC 2021 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ................................................ 47
TABLE 7-7: EAC 2023 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ......................................... 48
TABLE 7-8: EAC 2023 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ................................................ 49
TABLE 7-9: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ......................................... 50
TABLE 7-10: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS .............................................. 51
TABLE 7-11: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ...................... 52
TABLE 7-12: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS ............................ 53
TABLE 7-13: EXISTING 2019 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ............................. 55
TABLE 7-14: EA OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ............................................... 57
TABLE 7-15: EAC 2021 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ..................................... 59
TABLE 7-16: EAC 2023 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ..................................... 61
TABLE 7-17: EAC 2026 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ..................................... 63
TABLE 7-18: GENERAL PLAN 2040 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ................... 65
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
vi
TABLE 8-1: UNMITIGATED EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS ............................................................. 67
TABLE 8-2: MITIGATED EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS .................................................................. 68
TABLE 8-3: UNMITIGATED INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) ................................................................ 69
TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS .................................................................... 76
TABLE 10-2: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT-ONLY OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS ............................ 78
TABLE 9-3: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT DAYTIME NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS ....................... 81
TABLE 9-4: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT NIGHTTIME NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS ................... 81
TABLE 11-1: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS .................................................................... 84
TABLE 11-2: SITE PREPARATION ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS ................................................................... 86
TABLE 11-3: GRADING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS .................................................................................. 87
TABLE 11-4: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS ........................................................ 88
TABLE 11-5: ARCHITECTURAL COATING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS ........................................................ 89
TABLE 11-6: PAVING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS ..................................................................................... 90
TABLE 11-7: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY ................................................... 91
TABLE 11-8: UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE ....................... 92
TABLE 11-9: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS ........................................................... 94
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
(1) Reference
ADT Average Daily Traffic
ANSI American National Standards Institute
Calveno California Vehicle Noise
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA A-weighted decibels
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
INCE Institute of Noise Control Engineering
Leq Equivalent continuous (average) sound level
Lmax Maximum level measured over the time interval
Lmin Minimum level measured over the time interval
mph Miles per hour
PPV Peak Particle Velocity
Project The Wave – Coral Mountain
REMEL Reference Energy Mean Emission Level
RMS Root-mean-square
VdB Vibration Decibels
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Urban Crossroads, Inc. has prepared this noise study to determine the noise exposure and the
necessary noise mitigation measures for the proposed The Wave – Coral Mountain development
(“Project”). The Project site is located on the southwest corner of re-aligned Madison Street at
58th Avenue in the City of La Quinta. The Project is proposed to consist of a master planned
themed resort comprised of a recreational pool (wave pool), a 150-key hotel, 104 attached
dwelling units, 496 detached dwelling units, 60,000 square feet of retail, a pop-up village park,
and a total of 265 parking spaces. This study has been prepared consistent with applicable City
of La Quinta noise standards, and significance criteria based on guidance provided by Appendix
G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1)
To the extent this analysis considers impacts in relation to future residents of the Project, it does
so for informational purposes to show compliance with City regulations. CBIA v. BAAQMD (2015)
62 Cal.4th 369, 386 and Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th
455, 473 confirm that the impacts of the environment on a project are excluded from CEQA
unless the project itself “exacerbates” such impacts. As such, any impact on the future residents
of the Project is not an impact under CEQA.
OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS
Traffic generated by the operation of the proposed Project will influence the traffic noise levels
in surrounding off-site areas. To quantify the traffic noise increases on the surrounding off -site
areas, the changes in traffic noise levels on 28 roadway segments surrounding the Project site
were calculated based on the change in the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. The traffic noise
levels provided in this analysis are based on the traffic forecasts found in The Wave – Coral
Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis. (2) Based on the significance criteria in outlined in Section 4,
the Project-related noise level increases are considered potentially significant under Existing with
Project conditions at the following two roadway segments:
• Madison Street north of Avenue 58 (Segment 8)
• Avenue 60 west of Madison Street (Segment 27)
All other roadway segments are shown to experience less than significant noise level impacts
under Existing plus Project conditions. However, this scenario is provided solely for analytical
purposes and will not occur, since the Project will not be full developed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and
occupied under Existing 2019 conditions. Therefore, no mitigation measures are considered to
reduce the Existing with Project condition traffic noise level increases, and impacts are
considered less than significant since they will not actually occur. The analysis shows that the
unmitigated Project-related traffic noise level increases under all traffic scenarios will be less than
significant.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
2
ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS
An on-site exterior noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the traffic noise
exposure and to identify potential necessary noise abatement measures for the proposed The
Wave – Coral Mountain Project. It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the
Project site will be traffic noise from Avenue 58 and Madison Street.
EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION
To satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for residential land
use, the construction of 6-foot high noise barriers is required for the low-density residential
development within Planning Area VIII. With the recommended noise barriers shown on Exhibit
ES-A, the mitigated future exterior noise levels at the outdoor living areas (backyards) of single-
family residential uses in Planning Areas VIII will be reduced to less than 65.0 dBA CNEL. This
noise analysis shows that the planned 6-foot high noise barriers will satisfy the City of La Quinta
65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for single-family residential use. Therefore, future
on-site exterior traffic noise impacts will be less than significant.
The recommended noise control barriers shall be constructed so that the top of each wall extends
to the recommended height above the pad elevation of the lot it is shielding. When the road is
elevated above the pad elevation, the barrier shall extend to the recommended height above the
highest point between the residential home and the road. The barriers shall provide a weight of
at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line-of-sight openings
between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to
bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for
weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. The noise barrier shall be constructed using
one of the following materials:
• Masonry block;
• Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or one-inch thick tongue and groove wood of
sufficient weight per square foot;
• Glass (1/4-inch-thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot
capable of providing a minimum transmission loss of 20 dBA;
• Earthen berm;
• Any combination of these construction materials.
INTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION
To satisfy the City of La Quinta 45 dBA CNEL residential interior noise level standard the low
density single-family residential uses in Planning Areas VIII will require a Noise Reduction (NR) of
up to 22.5 dBA and a windows-closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g.
air conditioning). Therefore, the future on-site interior traffic noise impacts will be less than
significant with the following noise mitigation measures:
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
3
• Windows: All residential lots require first and second-floor windows and sliding glass doors that
have well-fitted, well-weather-stripped assemblies, with minimum sound transmission class (STC)
ratings of 27.
• Doors (Non-Glass): All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped and have minimum STC
ratings of 25. Well-sealed perimeter gaps around the doors are essential to achieve the optimal
STC rating. (3)
• Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the
wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal.
• Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be per manufacturer’s specification or caulked
plywood of at least one-half inch thick. Ceilings shall be per manufacturer’s specification or well-
sealed gypsum board of at least one-half inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall
be used in the attic space.
• Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window
can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation
system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g. fresh air supply) shall be provided
which satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
• Final Noise Study: A final noise study shall be prepared prior to obtaining building permits for the
project. This report would finalize the mitigation measures described in this study using the
precise grading plans and actual building design specifications, and may include additional
mitigation, if necessary, to meet the interior noise level standards for residential (45 dBA CNEL)
land uses.
OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS
Using reference noise levels to represent the expected noise sources from the The Wave – Coral
Mountain site, this analysis estimates the Project-related stationary-source noise levels at nearby
sensitive receiver locations. The normal activities associated with the proposed The Wave – Coral
Mountain are anticipated to include surf lagoon/wave machine activity, outdoor pool/spa
activity, parking lot vehicles, outdoor field activities, roof-top air conditioning units and special
event activity. The operational noise analysis shows that the Project-related stationary-source
noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations will satisfy the City of La Quinta daytime
and nighttime exterior noise level standards.
Further, this analysis demonstrates that the Project will contribute a less than significant long-
term unmitigated operational noise level impact to the existing daytime ambient noise
environment at the sensitive receiver locations. However, the Project will generate unmitigated
nighttime operational noise level increases of up to 8.6 dBA Leq at the receiver location R8, which
will exceed the nighttime significance criteria. Therefore, operational noise mitigation measures
are needed to reduce the potential nighttime noise level impacts at receiver location R8. This
may include restricting the nighttime surf lagoon/wave machine to the daytime hours between
7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. or providing noise barriers near receiver location R8 at southern project
boundaries. With the nighttime noise mitigation measures, the Project operational noise level
increases at all receiver locations will be less than significant.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
4
CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS
Construction-related noise impacts are expected to create temporary and intermittent high-level
noise conditions at receivers surrounding the Project site. Using sample reference noise levels
to represent the planned construction activities of the The Wave – Coral Mountain site, this
analysis estimates the Project-related construction noise levels at nearby sensitive receiver
locations. Since the City of La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Codes do not identify specific
construction noise level thresholds, a threshold is identified based on the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) limits for construction noise. The Project-related short-
term construction noise levels are expected to range from 38.9 to 67.5 dBA Leq and will satisfy
the 85 dBA Leq NIOSH construction noise level threshold at all receiver locations. Therefore,
based on the results of this analysis, all nearby sensitive receiver locations will experience less
than significant impacts due to Project construction noise levels.
CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the
equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected
that ground-borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent,
localized intrusion. This analysis shows the highest construction vibration levels are expected to
approach 0.008 in/sec RMS, which is below the vibration standard of 0.01 in/sec RMS at all
receiver locations Therefore, based on the results of this analysis, all nearby sensitive receiver
locations will experience less than significant impacts due to Project construction noise levels.
SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
The results of this The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis are summarized below
based on the significance criteria in Section 4 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1). Table ES-1 shows the findings of
significance for each potential noise and/or vibration impact under CEQA before and after any
required mitigation measures described below.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
5
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Off-Site Traffic
Noise Levels 7 Less Than Significant -
On-Site Traffic
Noise Levels 8 Potentially Significant Less Than Significant-
Operational
Noise Levels 10 Potentially Significant Less Than Significant -
Construction
Noise Levels
11
Less Than Significant -
Construction
Vibration Levels Potentially Significant Less Than Significant
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
6
EXHIBIT ES-A: SUMMARY OF ON-SITE RECOMMENDATIONS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
7
1 INTRODUCTION
This noise analysis has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the
development of the proposed The Wave – Coral Mountain (“Project”). This noise study briefly
describes the proposed Project, provides information regarding noise fundamentals, describes
the local regulatory setting, provides the study methods and procedures for transportation noise
analysis, and evaluates the future exterior noise environment. In addition, this study includes an
analysis of the potential Project-related long-term operational noise and short-term construction
noise and vibration impacts.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The Project site is located on the southwest corner of re-aligned Madison Street at 58th Avenue
in the City of La Quinta, as shown on Exhibit 1-A.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project consists of a master planned themed resort comprised of a recreational pool (wave
pool), a 150-key hotel, 104 attached dwelling units, 496 detached dwelling units, 60,000 square
feet of retail, a pop-up village park, and a total of 265 parking spaces. The preliminary Project
land use plan was previously presented on Exhibit 1-B.
The Project is anticipated to be constructed in phases, with Phase 1 (2021) including resort (wave
pool and hotel uses), 104 attached dwelling units, 26 detached dwelling units, and 10,000 square
feet of retail. Project Phase 2 (2023) adds 25,000 square feet of retail. Project Phase 3 (2026)
adds 470 detached dwelling units and 25,000 square feet of retail.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
8
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
9
EXHIBIT 1-B: PRELIMINARY LAND USE PLAN
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
10
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
11
2 FUNDAMENTALS
Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it
interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse
effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a
decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear
to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of
the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to
the human ear. Exhibit 2-A presents a summary of the typical noise levels and their subjective
loudness and effects that are described in more detail below.
EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
2.1 RANGE OF NOISE
Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used
to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for
measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 decibels indicates a sound energy ten
times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud.
(4) The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Normal
conversation at three feet is roughly at 60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA
at approximately 100 feet, which can cause serious discomfort. (5) Another important aspect of
noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
12
2.2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS
Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, rather than instantaneous,
noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent level (Leq). Equivalent sound levels
are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-
weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level
containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period and is
commonly used to describe the “average” noise levels within the environment.
Peak hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise
environment. Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times
when quiet is most desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for
this, the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level
is utilized. The CNEL is the weighted average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time
of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The time of day corrections require the addition of 5 decibels
to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the addition of 10
decibels to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. These additions are
made to account for the noise sensitive time periods during the evening and night hours when
sound appears louder. CNEL does not represent the actual sound level heard at any time, but
rather represents the total sound exposure. The City of La Quinta relies on the 24-hour CNEL
level to assess land use compatibility with transportation related noise sources.
2.3 SOUND PROPAGATION
When sound propagates over a distance, it changes in level and frequency content. The way noise
reduces with distance depends on the following factors.
2.3.1 GEOMETRIC SPREADING
Sound from a localized source (i.e., a stationary point source) propagates uniformly outward in a
spherical pattern. The sound level attenuates (or decreases) at a rate of 6 dB for each doubling
of distance from a point source. Highways consist of several localized noise sources on a defined
path and hence can be treated as a line source, which approximates the effect of s everal point
sources. Noise from a line source propagates outward in a cylindrical pattern, often referred to
as cylindrical spreading. Sound levels attenuate at a rate of 3 dB for each doubling of distance
from a line source. (4)
2.3.2 GROUND ABSORPTION
The propagation path of noise from a highway to a receiver is usually very close to the ground.
Noise attenuation from ground absorption and reflective wave canceling adds to the attenuation
associated with geometric spreading. Traditionally, the excess attenuation has also been
expressed in terms of attenuation per doubling of distance. This approximation is usually
sufficiently accurate for distances of less than 200 ft. For acoustically hard sites (i.e., sites with a
reflective surface between the source and the receiver, such as a parking lot or body of water),
no excess ground attenuation is assumed. For acoustically absorptive or soft sites (i.e., those
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
13
sites with an absorptive ground surface between the source and the receiver such as soft dirt,
grass, or scattered bushes and trees), an excess ground attenuation value of 1.5 dB per doubling
of distance is normally assumed. When added to the cylindrical spreading, the excess ground
attenuation results in an overall drop-off rate of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a line
source. (6)
2.3.3 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS
Receivers located downwind from a source can be exposed to increased noise levels relative to
calm conditions, whereas locations upwind can have lowered noise levels. Sound levels can be
increased at large distances (e.g., more than 500 feet) due to atmospheric temperature inversion
(i.e., increasing temperature with elevation). Other factors such as air temperature, humidity,
and turbulence can also have significant effects. (4)
2.3.4 SHIELDING
A large object or barrier in the path between a noise source and a receiver can substantially
attenuate noise levels at the receiver. The amount of attenuation provided by shielding depends
on the size of the object and the frequency content of the noise source. Shielding by trees and
other such vegetation typically only has an “out of sight, out of mind” effect. That is, the
perception of noise impact tends to decrease when vegetation blocks the line-of-sight to nearby
residents. However, for vegetation to provide a substantial, or even noticeable, noise reduction,
the vegetation area must be at least 15 feet in height, 100 feet wide and dense enough to
completely obstruct the line-of sight between the source and the receiver. This size of vegetation
may provide up to 5 dBA of noise reduction. The FHWA does not consider the planting of
vegetation to be a noise abatement measure. (6)
2.4 NOISE CONTROL
Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for an observation
point or receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This
concept is known as the source-path-receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can
be applied to these three elements.
2.5 NOISE BARRIER ATTENUATION
Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by up to 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of
traffic noise in half. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or
receiver. Noise barriers, however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be
high enough and long enough to block the path of the noise source. (6)
2.6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITH NOISE
Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. For example, schools, hospitals,
churches, and residences are more sensitive to noise intrusion than are commercial or industrial
developments and related activities. As ambient noise levels affect the perceived amenity or
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
14
livability of a development, so too can the mismanagement of noise impacts impair the economic
health and growth potential of a community by reducing the area’s desirability as a place to live,
shop and work. For this reason, land use compatibility with the noise environment is an
important consideration in the planning and design process. The FHWA encourages State and
Local government to regulate land development in such a way that noise-sensitive land uses are
either prohibited from being located adjacent to a highway, or that the developments are
planned, designed, and constructed in such a way that noise impacts are minimized. (7)
2.7 COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO NOISE
Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to
initiating court action, depending upon everyone’s susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes
about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including:
• Fear associated with noise producing activities;
• Socio-economic status and educational level;
• Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated;
• Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity;
• Belief that the noise source can be controlled.
Approximately ten percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to
any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints
will occur. Another twenty-five percent of the population will not complain even in very severe
noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any
given noise environment. (8) Surveys have shown that about ten percent of the people exposed
to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of
one dBA is associated with approximately two percent more people being highly annoyed. When
traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. (8)
Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the population can be expected to
exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels as shown on Exhibit 2-B. An increase
or decrease of 1 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments
(9), a change of 3 dBA are considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered
readily perceptible. (6)
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
15
EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION
2.8 EXPOSURE TO HIGH NOISE LEVELS
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets legal limits on noise exposure in
the workplace. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) for a worker over an eight -hour day is 90
dBA. The OSHA standard uses a 5 dBA exchange rate. This means that when the noise level is
increased by 5 dBA, the amount of time a person can be exposed to a certain noise level to receive
the same dose is cut in half. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
has recommended that all worker exposures to noise should be controlled below a level
equivalent to 85 dBA for eight hours to minimize occupational noise induced hearing loss. NIOSH
also recommends a 3 dBA exchange rate so that every increase by 3 dBA doubles the amount of
the noise and halves the recommended amount of exposure time. (10)
OSHA has implemented requirements to protect all workers in general industry (e.g. the
manufacturing and the service sectors) for employers to implement a Hearing Conservation
Program where workers are exposed to a time weighted average noise level of 85 dBA or higher
over an eight-hour work shift. Hearing Conservation Programs require employers to measure
noise levels, provide free annual hearing exams and free hearing protection, provide training,
and conduct evaluations of the adequacy of the hearing protectors in use unless changes to tools,
equipment and schedules are made so that they are less noisy and worker exposure to noise is
less than the 85 dBA. This noise study does not evaluate the noise exposure of workers within a
project or construction site based on CEQA requirements, and instead, evaluates Project-related
operational and construction noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations in the Project
study area.
2.9 VIBRATION
Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment (11),
vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the
vibration of room surfaces is called structure-borne noise. Sources of ground-borne vibrations
include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or
human-made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment).
Vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions.
As is the case with airborne sound, ground-borne vibrations may be described by amplitude and
frequency.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Just Perceptible
Barely Perceptible
Readily Perceptible
Twice as Loud
Noise Level Increase (dBA)
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
16
There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle
velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is
most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings but is not always suitable for
evaluating human response (annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to
respond to vibration signals. Instead, the human body responds to average vibration amplitude
often described as the root mean square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of
the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration
on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation
(VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration.
Typically, ground-borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with
distance from the source of the vibration. Sensitive receivers for vibration include structures
(especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents, the elderly, and sick),
vibration-sensitive equipment and/or activities
The background vibration-velocity level in residential areas is generally 50 VdB. Ground-borne
vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB. For most people, a
vibration-velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and
distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground-borne vibration are
construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth,
the ground-borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50
VdB, which is the typical background vibration-velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general
threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Exhibit 2-C illustrates common
vibration sources and the human and structural response to ground-borne vibration.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
17
EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND-BORNE VIBRATION
Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
18
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
19
3 REGULATORY SETTING
To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging as well as intrusive
noise levels, the federal government, the State of California, various county governments, and
most municipalities in the state have established standards and ordinances to control noise. In
most areas, automobile and truck traffic is the major source of environmental noise. Traffic
activity generally produces an average sound level that remains constant with time. Air and rail
traffic, and commercial and industrial activities are also major sources of noise in some areas.
Federal, state, and local agencies regulate different aspects of environmental noise. Federal and
state agencies generally set noise standards for mobile sources such as aircraft and motor
vehicles, while regulation of stationary sources is left to local agencies.
3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOISE REQUIREMENTS
The State of California regulates freeway noise, sets standards for sound transmission, provides
occupational noise control criteria, identifies noise standards, and provides guidance for local
land use compatibility. State law requires that each county and city adopt a General Plan that
includes a Noise Element which is to be prepared per guidelines adopted by the Governor’s Office
of Planning and Research. (12) The purpose of the Noise Element is to limit the exposure of the
community to excessive noise levels. In addition, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
requires that all known environmental effects of a project be analyzed, including environmental
noise impacts.
3.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
The State of California’s noise insulation standards are codified in the California Code of
Regulations, Title 24, Building Standards Administrative Code, Part 2, and the California Building
Code. These noise standards are applied to new construction in California for the purpose of
controlling interior noise levels resulting from exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that
acoustical studies must be prepared when noise-sensitive structures, such as residential
buildings, schools, or hospitals, are developed near major transportation noise sources, and
where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 60 dBA CNEL or higher. Acoustical
studies that accompany building plans for noise-sensitive land uses must demonstrate that the
structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels.
For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new
construction is 45 dBA CNEL.
3.3 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT
The City of La Quinta has adopted an Environmental Hazards Element (Chapter 4), Noise section,
of the General Plan which identifies areas where noise levels are expected to reach unacceptable
levels, and provides policies and programs which will assure that noise levels do not negatively
impact the community. (13) The Noise Element specifies the maximum exterior and interior noise
levels for new developments impacted by transportation noise sources such as arterial roads,
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
20
freeways, airports and railroads. To protect City residents from excessive noise, the
Environmental Hazards Element contains the following goal related to the Project:
N-1 A healthful noise environment which complements the City’s residential and resort
character.
The noise policies specified in the City of La Quinta Environmental Hazards Element provide the
guidelines necessary to satisfy this goal. To minimize noise impacts to noise-sensitive land uses,
the City has established Policy N-1.1 to identify noise standards consistent with the Land Use
Compatibility for Community Noise Environments, Table IV-3, for various land uses. The Noise
Element also provides several policies to minimize noise impacts from transportation, such as
Policy N-1.2, which requires a noise study and any necessary mitigation measures for new
developments along roadways where the noise levels are in excess of 65 dBA CNEL.
The noise criteria identified in the City of La Quinta Environmental Hazards Element, Noise
section, are guidelines to evaluate the land use compatibility of transportation related noise. The
compatibility criteria, shown on Exhibit 3-A, provides the City with a planning tool to gauge the
compatibility of land uses relative to existing and future exterior noise levels.
The Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments (Table IV-3) matrix in the City of
La Quinta General Plan provides guidelines to evaluate the acceptability of transportation-related
noise level impacts. Residential and nursing home uses, such as the Project, are considered
normally acceptable with exterior noise levels below 60 dBA CNEL and conditionally acceptable
with exterior noise levels of up to 70 dBA CNEL. For conditionally acceptable land use, the
General Plan indicates new construction or development should be undertaken only after a
detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation
features are included in the design. (13)
Based on the City of La Quinta land use compatibility guidelines for the Project land uses, this
noise study has been prepared to satisfy an exterior noise level criteria of 65 dBA CNEL in outdoor
living areas, and an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL consistent with the State of California
Building Code.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
21
EXHIBIT 3-A: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
22
3.4 OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS
To analyze noise impacts originating from a designated fixed location or private property such as
the Project, stationary-source (operational) noise such as the expected surf lagoon/wave
machine activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, parking lot vehicles, outdoor field activities, roof-top
air conditioning units and special event activity are typically evaluated against standards
established under a jurisdiction’s Municipal Code.
The City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Sections 9.100.210 (B) and (C) establish the
noise level standards for stationary noise sources. For residential properties, the exterior noise
level shall not exceed 65 dBA L₅₀ during the daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 50 dBA
L₅₀ during the nighttime hours. (14) The exterior noise level standards shall apply for a
cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour, as well as plus 5 dBA canno t be exceeded for a
cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour, or the standard plus 10 dBA for a
cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour, or the standard plus 15 dBA for a
cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour, or the standard plus 20 dBA for any period
of time. The City of La Quinta operational noise level standards are shown on Table 3-1 and
included in Appendix 3.1.
TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS
City Land
Use
Time
Period
Exterior Noise Level Standards1
L50
(30 mins)
L25
(15 mins)
L8
(5 mins)
L2
(1 min)
Lmax
(<1 min)
La
Quinta2
Residential, Schools,
Hospitals & Churches
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 65 70 75 80 85
10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 50 55 60 65 70
1 The noise level exceeded "n" percent of the time during the measurement period. L₂₅ is the noise level exceeded 25% of the time.
2 Source: City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & (C) (Appendix 3.1).
3.5 CONSTRUCTION NOISE STANDARDS
To analyze noise impacts originating from the construction of The Wave – Coral Mountain, noise
from construction activities are typically evaluated against standards established under a City’s
Municipal Code. The Municipal Code noise standards for construction are described below f or
the City of La Quinta to determine the potential noise impacts at nearby receiver locations.
To control noise impacts associated with the construction of the proposed Project, the City has
established limits to the hours of operation. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Section
6.08.050 indicates that construction, shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00
p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities
are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays. (14)
However, the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code do not establish numeric maximum
acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow
for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes as the generation of noise levels in
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
23
excess of standards or as a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase, the following
construction noise level thresholds are used in this noise study.
To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant temporary construction
noise levels at off-site sensitive receiver locations, a construction-related noise level threshold is
adopted from the Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure prepared by
the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (15) A division of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, NIOSH identifies a noise level threshold based on the
duration of exposure to the source. The construction related noise level threshold starts at 85
dBA for more than eight hours per day, and for every 3 dBA increase, the exposure time is cut in
half. This results in noise level thresholds of 88 dBA for more than four hours per day, 92 dBA for
more than one hour per day, 96 dBA for more than 30 minutes per day, and up to 100 dBA for
more than 15 minutes per day. (15) For the purposes of this analysis, the lowest, more
conservative construction noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq is used as an acceptable threshold
for construction noise at the nearby sensitive receiver locations. Since this construction-related
noise level threshold represents the energy average of the noise source over a given time, they
are expressed as Leq noise levels. Therefore, the noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq over a period
of eight hours or more is used to evaluate the potential Project-related construction noise level
impacts at the nearby sensitive receiver locations.
3.6 VIBRATION STANDARDS
The County of Riverside does not have vibration standards for temporary construction, but the
County’s General Plan Noise Element does contain the human reaction to typical vibration levels.
Vibration levels with peak particle velocity of 0.0787 inches per second are considered readily
perceptible and above 0.1968 in/sec are considered annoying to people i n buildings. Further,
County of Riverside General Plan Policy N 16.3 identifies a motion velocity perception threshold
for vibration due to passing trains of 0.01 inches per second (in/sec) over the range of one to 100
Hz, which is used in this noise study to assess potential impacts due to Project construction
vibration levels. (16)
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
24
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
25
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
The following significance criteria are based on currently adopted guidance provided by Appendix
G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1) For the purposes of this
report, impacts would be potentially significant if the Project results in or causes:
A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
B. Generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
While the City of La Quinta General Plan Guidelines provide direction on noise compatibility and
establish noise standards by land use type that are sufficient to assess the significance of noise
impacts, they do not define the levels at which increases are considered substantial for use under
Guideline A. CEQA Appendix G Guideline C applies to nearby public and private airports, if any,
and the Project’s land use compatibility.
4.1 CEQA GUIDELINES NOT FURTHER ANALYZED
The Project site is located roughly 19 miles southeast of Palm Springs International Airport, and
five miles west of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. Therefore, the Project site is not
located within two miles of a public airport or the vicinity of a private airstrip, and as such, no
impact related to the exposure of people residing or working in the Project area to excessive
airport related noise levels is anticipated.
4.2 NOISE-SENSITIVE RECEIVERS
Noise level increases resulting from the Project are evaluated based on the Appendix G CEQA
Guidelines described above at the closest sensitive receiver locations. Under CEQA,
consideration must be given to the magnitude of the increase, the existing ambient noise levels,
and the location of noise-sensitive receivers to determine if a noise increase represents a
significant adverse environmental impact. This approach recognizes that there is no single noise
increase that renders the noise impact significant. (17)
Unfortunately, there is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise
or of the corresponding human reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily
because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and differing individual
experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of determining a person’s subjective reaction to
a new noise is the comparison of it to the existing environment to which one has adapted —the
so-called ambient environment.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
26
In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less
acceptable the new noise will typically be judged. The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise
(FICON) (18) developed guidance to be used for the assessment of project-generated increases
in noise levels that consider the ambient noise level. The FICON recommendations are based on
studies that relate aircraft noise levels to the percentage of persons highly annoyed by aircraft
noise. Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise
impacts, these recommendations are often used in environmental noise impact assessments
involving the use of cumulative noise exposure metrics, such as the average-daily noise level
(CNEL) and equivalent continuous noise level (Leq).
As previously stated, the approach used in this noise study recognizes that there is no single noise
increase that renders the noise impact significant, based on a 2008 California Court of Appeal
ruling on Gray v. County of Madera. (17) For example, if the ambient noise environment is quiet
(<60 dBA) and the new noise source greatly increases the noise levels, an impact may occur if the
noise criteria may be exceeded. Therefore, for this analysis, FICON identifies a readily perceptible
5 dBA or greater project-related noise level increase is considered a significant impact when the
noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded. Per the FICON, in areas where the without project
noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA, a 3 dBA barely perceptible noise level increase appears to
be appropriate for most people. When the without project noise levels already exceed 65 dBA,
any increase in community noise louder than 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact
if the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded, since it likely contributes to an existing noise
exposure exceedance. Table 4-1 below provides a summary of the potential noise impact
significance criteria, based on guidance from FICON.
TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE OF NOISE IMPACTS AT NOISE-SENSITIVE RECEIVERS
Without Project Noise Level Potential Significant Impact
< 60 dBA 5 dBA or more
60 - 65 dBA 3 dBA or more
> 65 dBA 1.5 dBA or more
Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), 1992.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
27
4.3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY
Noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the
proposed development. The significance criteria is shown on Table 4-2.
OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE
• When the noise levels at existing and future noise-sensitive land uses (e.g. residential, etc.):
o are less than 60 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
o range from 60 to 65 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
o already exceed 65 dBA CNEL, and the Project creates a community noise level increase of
greater than 1.5 dBA CNEL (FICON, 1992).
ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE
• If the on-site exterior noise levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL at the outdoor living areas of residential
homes, or 70 dBA CNEL at hotel uses. Interior noise levels shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL for
residential homes and the hotel building (City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Municipal Code,
Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & General Plan Noise Element Policy N-1.2).
OPERATIONAL NOISE
• If Project-related operational (stationary-source) noise levels:
o exceed the exterior 65 dBA L₅₀ daytime or 50 dBA L₅₀ nighttime noise level standards for
residential land uses. These standards shall not be exceeded for a cumulative period of
30 minutes (L50), or plus 5 dBA cannot be exceeded for a cumulative period of more than
15 minutes (L25) in any hour, or the standard plus 10 dBA for a cumulative period of more
than 5 minutes (L8) in any hour, or the standard plus 15 dBA for a cumulative period of
more than 1 minute (L2) in any hour, or the standard plus 20 dBA at any time (Lmax) (City
of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & (C));
• If the existing ambient noise levels at the nearby noise-sensitive receivers near the Project site:
o are less than 60 dBA L₅₀ and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA L₅₀ or greater
Project-related noise level increase; or
o range from 60 to 65 dBA L₅₀ and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA L₅₀ or
greater Project-related noise level increase; or
o already exceed 65 dBA L₅₀, and the Project creates a community noise level increase of
greater than 1.5 dBA L₅₀ (FICON, 1992).
CONSTRUCTION NOISE & VIBRATION
• If Project-related construction activities create noise levels which exceed the 85 dBA Leq
acceptable noise level threshold at the nearby sensitive receiver locations (NIOSH, Criteria for
Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure).
• If short-term Project generated construction vibration levels exceed the County of Riverside
vibration standard of 0.01 in/sec RMS at sensitive receiver locations (County of Riverside General
Plan Noise Element, Policy N 16.3).
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
28
TABLE 4-2: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY
Analysis Receiving
Land Use Condition(s)
Significance Criteria
Daytime Nighttime
Off-Site
Traffic Noise1
Noise-
Sensitive
If ambient is < 60 dBA CNEL ≥ 5 dBA CNEL Project increase
If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA CNEL ≥ 3 dBA CNEL Project increase
If ambient is > 65 dBA CNEL ≥ 1.5 dBA CNEL Project increase
On-Site
Traffic Noise
Exterior Noise Level Criteria 65 dBA CNEL
Interior Noise Level Standard 45 dBA CNEL
Operational
Noise3
Exterior Noise Level Standards See Table 3-1.
if ambient is < 60 dBA L₅₀ ≥ 5 dBA L50 Project increase
if ambient is 60 - 65 dBA L50 ≥ 3 dBA L50 Project increase
if ambient is > 65 dBA L50 ≥ 1.5 dBA L50 Project increase
Construction4
Noise Level Threshold 85 dBA Leq n/a
Vibration Level Threshold 0.01 in/sec RMS n/a
1 Source: FICON, 1992.
2 Sources: City of La Quinta General Plan Noise Element & California Building Code.
3 Sources: City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Section 6.08.050 (Appendix 3.1) and FICON guidance.
4 Sources: NIOSH, Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure and County of Riverside General Plan Noise
Element, Policy 16.3.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.; "n/a" = No nighttime construction activity is permitted, so
no nighttime construction noise level limits are identified; "RMS" = root-mean-square
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
29
5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
To assess the existing noise level environment, 24-hour noise level measurements were taken at
ten locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to desc ribe and
document the existing noise environment within the Project study area. Exhibit 5-A provides the
boundaries of the Project study area and the noise level measurement locations. To fully
describe the existing noise conditions, noise level measurements were collected by Urban
Crossroads, Inc. on Wednesday October 16th, 2019. Appendix 5.1 includes study area photos.
5.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA
To describe the existing noise environment, the hourly noise levels were measured during typical
weekday conditions over a 24-hour period. By collecting individual hourly noise level
measurements, it is possible to describe the daytime and nighttime hourly noise levels and
calculate the 24-hour CNEL. The long-term noise readings were recorded using Piccolo Type 2
integrating sound level meter and dataloggers. The Piccolo sound level meters were calibrated
using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise meters were programmed in "slow"
mode to record noise levels in "A" weighted form. The sound level meters and microphones
were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. All noise level measurement
equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard specifications for
sound level meters ANSI S1.4-2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. (19)
5.2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
The long-term noise level measurements were positioned as close to the nearest sensitive
receiver locations as possible to assess the existing ambient hourly noise levels surrounding the
Project site. Both Caltrans and the FTA recognize that it is not reasonable to collect noise level
measurements that can fully represent every part of a private yard, patio, deck, or balcony
normally used for human activity when estimating impacts for new development projects. This
is demonstrated in the Caltrans general site location guidelines which indicate that, sites must be
free of noise contamination by sources other than sources of interest. Avoid sites located near
sources such as barking dogs, lawnmowers, pool pumps, and air conditioners unless it is the
express intent of the analyst to measure these sources. (4) Further, FTA guidance states, that it
is not necessary nor recommended that existing noise exposure be determined by measuring at
every noise-sensitive location in the project area. Rather, the recommended approach is to
characterize the noise environment for clusters of sites based on measurements or estimates at
representative locations in the community. (11)
Based on recommendations of Caltrans and the FTA, it is not necessary to collect measurements
at each individual building or residence, because each receiver measurement represents a group
of buildings that share acoustical equivalence. (11) In other words, the area represented by the
receiver shares similar shielding, terrain, and geometric relationship to the reference noise
source. Receivers represent a location of noise sensitive areas and are used to estimate the
future noise level impacts. Collecting reference ambient noise level measurements at the nearby
sensitive receiver locations allows for a comparison of the before and after Project noise levels
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
30
and is necessary to assess potential noise impacts due to the Project’s contribution to the
ambient noise levels.
5.3 NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS
The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq).
The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total
energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. Table 5-1 identifies the hourly
daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise levels at each
noise level measurement location. Additional median noise levels (L₅₀) are provided on Table 5-
1 consistent with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code exterior noise level standards. Appendix
5.2 provides a summary of the existing hourly ambient noise levels described below:
• Location L1 represents the noise located on 58th Avenue in front of entrance to Coral
Mountain and west of Salida del Sol. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic
noise from 58th Avenue and background residential land use noise source activities. The
noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 58.5 dBA
CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 54.2 dBA L eq
with an average nighttime noise level of 51.5 dBA Leq.
• Location L2 represents the noise levels on 58th Avenue south of a single-family residential
home at 57925 Barristo Circle. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic
noise from 58th Avenue and background residential land use noise source activities. The
noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 67.6 dBA
CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 62.5 dBA L eq
with an average nighttime noise level of 60.7 dBA Leq.
• Location L3 represents the noise levels located northeast of Madison Street and 58th Avenue
adjacent to wall enclosing golf course. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of
traffic noise from 58th Avenue and Madison Avenue. The noise level measurements collected
show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 63.6 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic)
average daytime noise level was calculated at 61.2 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise
level of 55.6 dBA Leq.
• Location L4 represents the noise levels southeast of Madison Street and 58th Avenue. The
noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 60.1 dBA
CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 54.5 dBA L eq
with an average nighttime noise level of 53.2 dBA Leq. The noise levels at this location consist
primarily of traffic noise from Street and 58th Avenue
• Location L5 represents the noise levels south of 58th Avenue outside northwest corner of the
Analusia Country Club. The 24-hour CNEL indicates that the overall exterior noise level is 63.3
dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 59.7 dBA
Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 56.1 dBA Leq. Noise levels at this location are
primarily due to traffic from Madison Street, 58th Avenue, and background residential land
use activities.
• Location L6 represents the noise levels on CII Conchita southeast of an existing single-family
residential home at 80900 CII Conchita. Noise levels at this location are primarily from traffic
on Madison Avenue. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
31
exterior noise level of 63.0 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level
was calculated at 58.7 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 55.8 dBA Leq.
• Location L7 represents noise levels on 60th Avenue north of gated entrance to a future single-
family residential community. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-
hour exterior noise level of 63.1 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise
level was calculated at 57.9 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 56.1 dBA Leq. The
noise levels at this location primarily consist of traffic on 60th Ave. and background residential
land use.
• Location L8 represents noise levels on the western end of 60th Avenue south of an existing
single-family residential home at 80800 60th Avenue. Noise levels at this location are
primarily from background residential use. The noise level measurements collected show an
overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 47.3 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average
daytime noise level was calculated at 43.8 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of
39.9 dBA Leq.
• Location L9 represents noise levels on Jefferson Street north of Quarry Lane. Noise levels at
this location are primarily from traffic on Jefferson Street. The noise level measurements
collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 56.0 dBA CNEL. The energy
(logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 51.7 dBA Leq with an average
nighttime noise level of 48.9 dBA Leq.
• Location L10 represents the noise levels on 58th Avenue. east of 58th Avenue. and Stone
Creek Way intersection. Noise levels at this location primarily consist of traffic on 58th
Avenue. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level
of 63.3 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 61.9
dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 54.2 dBA Leq.
Table 5-1 provides the (energy average) noise levels used to describe the daytime and nighttime
ambient conditions. These daytime and nighttime energy average noise levels represent the
average of all hourly noise levels observed during these time periods expressed as a single
number. Appendix 5.2 provides summary worksheets of the noise levels for each hour as well as
the minimum, maximum, L1, L2, L5, L8, L25, L50, L90, L95, and L99 percentile noise levels observed
during the daytime and nighttime periods.
The background ambient noise levels in the Project study area are dominated by the
transportation-related noise associated with the arterial roadway network. The 24-hour existing
noise level measurements shown on Table 5-1 present the existing ambient noise conditions.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
32
TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
Location1 Description
Energy Average
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)2 CNEL
Daytime Nighttime
L1 Located on 58th Ave. in front of entrance to
Coral Mountain and west of Salida del Sol. 54.2 51.5 58.5
L2 Located on 58th Ave. south of home at 57925
Barristo Cir. 62.5 60.7 67.6
L3 Located northeast of Madison St. and 58th Ave.
adjacent to wall enclosing golf course. 61.2 55.6 63.6
L4 Located on the southeast corner of 58th Ave,
and Madison St. 54.5 53.2 60.1
L5 Located south of 58th Ave. outside northwest
corner of the Analusia Country Club. 59.7 56.1 63.3
L6 Located on CII Conchita southeast of home at
80900 CII Conchita. 58.7 55.8 63.0
L7 Located on 60th Ave. north of gated entrance to
single family homes. 57.9 56.1 63.1
L8 Located towards the western end of 60th Ave.
south of home at 80800 60th Ave. 43.8 39.9 47.3
L9 Located on Jefferson St. north of Quarry Ln. 51.7 48.9 56.0
L10 Located on 58th Ave. slightly east of 58th Ave.
and Stone Creek Way intersection. 61.9 54.2 63.3
1 See Exhibit 5-A for the noise level measurement locations.
2 Energy (logarithmic) average levels. The long-term 24-hour measurement worksheets are included in Appendix 5.2.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
33
EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
34
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
35
6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES
The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to model and analyze the future
traffic noise environment.
6.1 FHWA TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
The expected roadway noise level increases from vehicular traffic were calculated using a
computer program that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise
Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-108. (20) The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level
through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). In
California the national REMELs are substituted with the California Vehicle Noise (Calveno)
Emission Levels. (21)
Adjustments are then made to the REMEL to account for: the roadway classification (e.g.,
collector, secondary, major or arterial), the roadway active width (i.e., the distance between the
center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway), the total average daily traffic
(ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks in the
traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway view is blocked),
the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement, or
landscaping), and the percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour
period. Research conducted by Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is
appropriate for the application of the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis.
(22)
This methodology is consistent with the County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene
Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures,
which specifically requires the FHWA RD-77-108 model to be used in analysis within the County’s
jurisdiction. (23)
6.1.1 OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS
Table 6-1 presents the roadway parameters used to assess the Project’s off-site transportation
noise impacts. Table 6-1 identifies the 28 study area roadway segments, the distance from the
centerline to adjacent land use based on the functional roadway classifications per the City of La
Quinta General Plan Circulation Element, and the posted vehicle speeds. Consistent with The
Wave – Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. (2) the off-
site traffic noise analysis maintains a peak hour to average daily traffic (peak-to-daily)
relationship of approximately 9.30% and includes the following traffic scenarios.
• Existing (2019)
• Existing Plus Project (E+P)
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project (EAP)
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Projects Plus Project (EAPC) for each of the
following phases:
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
36
o Project Phase 1
o Project Phase 2
o Project buildout (Phase 3)
• General Plan buildout (2040) Without Project Conditions
• General Plan buildout (2040) With Project Conditions
The average daily traffic (ADT) volumes used for this study are presented on Table 6-2. Table 6-
3 provides the time of day (daytime, evening, and nighttime) vehicle splits and Table 6-4 presents
the traffic flow distributions (vehicle mix) used for this analysis. The vehicle mix provides the
hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks, and heavy trucks for input into
the FHWA noise prediction model.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
37
TABLE 6-1: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS
ID Roadway Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
Roadway
Classification2
Distance From
Centerline To
Nearest Adjacent
Land Use (Feet)2
Vehicle
Speed
(mph)3
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR Major Arterial 64' 55
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC Major Arterial 64' 55
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS Major Arterial 64' 55
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District Primary Arterial 54' 50
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC Secondary Arterial 51' 45
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR Boulevard 64' 50
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR Boulevard 64' 50
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR Boulevard 64' 50
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR Secondary Arterial 51' 45
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF Secondary Arterial 51' 45
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR Major 59' 50
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR Major 59' 50
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR Collector 40' 40
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS Secondary Arterial 51' 45
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan Land Use Map.
2 Distance to adjacent land use based on the right-of-way distances for each functional roadway classification provided in the
General Plan Circulation Element.
3 Source: The Wave-Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Inc.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
38
TABLE 6-2: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
Without
Project
With
Project
1 Jefferson St.n/o Avenue 50 22.8 23.3 28.2 28.7 32.0 32.1 33.8 33.9 36.5 37.0 51.5 52.0
2 Jefferson St.n/o Avenue 52 16.2 16.9 19.4 20.1 22.9 23.0 24.1 24.2 25.8 26.5 34.3 35.0
3 Jefferson St.n/o Avenue 54 12.7 13.6 16.2 17.1 18.4 18.6 19.8 20.0 21.7 22.5 32.2 33.0
4 Madison St.n/o Avenue 50 5.9 6.4 9.0 9.5 8.2 8.3 9.2 9.3 10.8 11.3 22.5 23.0
5 Madison St.n/o Avenue 52 6.9 7.7 11.3 12.1 9.4 9.5 10.9 11.0 13.3 14.0 32.3 33.0
6 Madison St.n/o Avenue 54 4.5 5.8 7.5 8.8 7.5 7.8 8.6 8.9 10.3 11.6 23.7 25.0
7 Madison St.n/o Airport Bl.9.4 11.9 15.2 17.7 13.8 14.4 15.4 16.1 18.2 20.7 42.5 45.0
8 Madison St.n/o Avenue 58 6.7 9.7 10.7 13.7 11.2 12.0 12.6 13.6 14.3 17.3 31.0 34.0
9 Madison St.n/o Avenue 60 2.8 3.8 5.2 6.2 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.8 3.6 7.6 19.0 20.0
10 Monroe St.n/o Avenue 50 9.6 10.1 10.2 10.7 12.8 12.9 13.2 13.3 13.8 14.3 15.1 15.6
11 Monroe St.n/o Avenue 52 7.5 8.2 9.7 10.4 10.7 10.8 11.7 11.8 13.1 13.8 19.3 20.0
12 Monroe St.n/o Avenue 54 5.1 5.9 8.9 9.7 8.6 8.7 10.3 10.4 12.9 13.6 31.3 32.0
13 Monroe St.n/o Airport Bl.3.9 4.6 7.6 8.3 6.7 6.9 9.2 9.3 12.6 13.3 34.3 35.0
14 Monroe St.n/o Avenue 58 3.4 4.4 6.0 7.0 6.9 6.9 9.0 9.3 12.0 13.1 24.9 26.0
15 Monroe St.n/o Avenue 60 2.7 2.9 5.2 5.4 6.4 6.4 9.2 9.2 12.6 12.8 26.8 27.0
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St.12.9 13.4 13.0 13.5 16.7 16.8 16.8 16.9 17.0 17.5 17.2 17.7
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St.11.2 11.4 14.6 14.8 14.6 14.6 15.7 15.7 17.4 17.6 27.8 28.0
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St.9.3 9.5 11.9 12.1 11.1 11.1 11.9 11.9 13.3 13.5 20.8 21.0
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St.7.9 8.3 11.2 11.6 11.5 11.6 12.6 12.7 14.3 14.6 25.7 26.0
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St.8.6 9.4 12.8 13.6 10.9 11.1 12.4 12.6 14.7 15.5 30.2 31.0
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St.5.3 5.6 7.7 8.0 6.5 6.6 7.7 7.8 9.4 9.7 17.7 18.0
22 Airport Bl.w/o Monroe St.2.0 2.3 4.0 4.3 2.9 3.0 3.5 3.6 4.5 4.8 16.7 17.0
ID Roadway Segment
Existing 2019 EA EAC 2023 EAC 2026 General Plan
Average Daily Traffic (1,000's)1
EAC 2021
1 Source: The Wave-Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Inc.
"EA" = Existing plus Ambient Growth; "EAC" = EA plus Cumulative
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
39
TABLE 6-3: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS
Vehicle Type
Time of Day Splits1 Total of Time of
Day Splits Daytime Evening Nighttime
Autos 77.50% 12.90% 9.60% 100.00%
Medium Trucks 84.80% 4.90% 10.30% 100.00%
Heavy Trucks 86.50% 2.70% 10.80% 100.00%
1 Source: Typical Southern California vehicle mix.
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Evening" = 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
TABLE 6-4: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX)
Classification
Total % Traffic Flow
Total
Autos Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks
All Roadways1 97.42% 1.84% 0.74% 100.00%
1 Source: Typical Southern California vehicle mix and the County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene.
6.1.2 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS
The on-site roadway parameters including the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes used for this
study are presented on Table 6-5. To predict the future on-site noise environment at the Project
site, parameters including the number of lanes and daily volume thresholds were obtained from
the City of La Quinta General Plan Transportation Element and The Wave – Coral Mountain Traffic
Impact Analysis. For the purposes of this analysis, soft site conditions were used to analyze the
on-site traffic noise impacts for the Project study area. Soft site conditions account for the sound
propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. Research by
Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is appropriate for the application of the
FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. (22)
TABLE 6-5: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS
Roadway Lanes Classification1 Average Daily
Traffic Volume1
Speed
Limit
(mph)2
Site
Conditions
Avenue 58 4 Secondary Arterial 12,500 45 Soft
Madison Street 4 Secondary Arterial 20,000 45 Soft
1 Source: The Wave at Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis General Plan Buildout (2040)
2 Posted speed limit.
The site plan is used to identify the relationship between the roadway centerline elevation, the
pad elevation and the centerline distance to any intervening noise barriers, and the building
façade. The exterior noise level impacts were placed five feet above the finished floor elevation
at the outdoor living areas and proposed building façades. Second-floor receivers were located
14 feet above the finished floor elevation.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
40
6.2 VIBRATION ASSESSMENT
This analysis focuses on the potential ground-borne vibration associated with vehicular traffic
and construction activities. Ground-borne vibration levels from automobile traffic are generally
overshadowed by vibration generated by heavy trucks that roll over the same uneven roadway
surfaces. However, due to the rapid drop-off rate of ground-borne vibration and the short
duration of the associated events, vehicular traffic-induced ground-borne vibration is rarely
perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and rarely results in vibration levels that cause
damage to buildings in the vicinity.
However, while vehicular traffic is rarely perceptible, construction has the potential to result in
varying degrees of temporary ground vibration, depending on the specific construction activities
and equipment used. Ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction
equipment are summarized on Table 6-6. Based on the representative vibration levels presented
for various construction equipment types, it is possible to estimate the potential Project
construction vibration levels using the following vibration assessment methods defined by the
FTA. The FTA provides the following equation: PPVequip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5
TABLE 6-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Equipment PPV (in/sec)
at 25 feet
Small bulldozer 0.003
Jackhammer 0.035
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Large bulldozer 0.089
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
41
7 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS
To assess the off-site transportation CNEL noise level impacts associated with development of
the proposed Project, noise contours were developed based on The Wave – Coral Mountain
Traffic Impact Analysis. (2) Noise contour boundaries represent the equal levels of noise
exposure and are measured in CNEL from the center of the roadway. Noise contours were
developed for the following traffic scenarios:
• Existing Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing present-day 2019 noise
conditions, without and with the development of the full Project (Phase 3). The Existing With
Project scenario will not actually occur since the Project would not be fully constructed and
operational until Phase 3 2026 conditions.
• Existing plus Ambient (EA) Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing present-
day 2019 noise conditions plus the estimated 7 years of background growth in ambient traffic
conditions without and with the development of the full Project (Phase 3).
• Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2021 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to
the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2021 without and with the proposed
Project Phase 1. Project Phase 1 includes the 12-acre wave pool facility, a 150-key hotel, 96
multifamily attached dwelling units, 26 single family detached dwelling units, and 10,000 square
feet of retail
• Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2023 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to
the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2023 without and with the proposed
Project Phase 2. In addition, to Project Phase 1, Project Phase 2 includes an additional 25,000
square feet of retail for a total of 12-acre wave pool facility, a 150-key hotel, 104 multifamily
attached dwelling units, 26 single family detached dwelling units, and 35,000 square feet of retail.
• Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2026 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to
the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2026 without and with the proposed
Project Phase 3. In addition, to Project Phase 1 and 2, Project Phase 3 includes an additional
25,000 square feet of retail and 470 single family detached dwelling units for a total of 12-acre
wave pool facility, a 150-key hotel, 104 multifamily attached dwelling units, 496 single family
detached dwelling units, 60,000 square feet of retail.
• General Plan (GP) 2040 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the future General Plan
buildout conditions at Year 2040 without and with the proposed Project. This scenario represents
buildout of the General Plan land use and includes all cumulative projects identified in the Traffic
Impact Analysis.
7.1 TRAFFIC NOISE CONTOURS
Noise contours were used to assess the Project's incremental traffic-related noise impacts at land
uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. The noise contours represent the distance
to noise levels of a constant value and are measured from the center of the roadway for the 70,
65, and 60 dBA noise levels. The noise contours do not consider the effect of any existing noise
barriers or topography that may attenuate ambient noise levels. In addition, because the noise
contours reflect modeling of vehicular noise on area roadways, they appropriately do not reflect
noise contributions from the surrounding stationary noise sources within the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
42
Tables 7-1 and 7-12 present a summary of the exterior traffic noise levels for each traffic
condition. Appendix 7.1 includes the traffic noise level contours worksheets for each traffic
condition.
TABLE 7-1: EXISTING 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.8 85 182 393
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.3 67 145 313
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.3 57 123 266
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 65.6 28 59 128
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 31 66 142
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 64.4 23 50 107
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 67.6 38 81 175
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 66.2 30 65 139
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 61.5 14 30 64
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.2 36 77 166
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.1 30 65 141
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.0 25 54 116
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 63.8 21 45 97
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 63.2 19 41 89
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.2 16 35 76
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.0 46 100 216
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.4 42 91 196
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.1 35 75 162
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 66.9 33 72 155
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.3 35 76 165
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.2 26 55 119
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 60.9 13 29 62
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 59.1 10 20 44
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 60.6 12 26 56
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 46.9 1 2 5
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 62.1 15 33 70
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
43
TABLE 7-2: EXISTING 2019 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.9 86 185 398
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.5 69 149 322
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.6 60 129 278
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 66.0 29 63 135
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.8 33 71 153
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.5 27 59 127
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 68.7 44 95 204
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 67.8 38 83 178
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.8 17 36 79
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.4 37 80 172
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.5 32 69 149
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.6 28 59 128
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 64.5 23 50 108
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 64.3 23 49 105
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.5 17 37 80
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.2 48 103 221
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.5 43 92 199
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.2 36 76 165
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 67.1 35 75 161
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.6 38 81 175
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 27 57 124
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 61.5 15 32 68
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 60.2 11 25 53
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.1 18 38 83
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 58.0 6 14 30
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.5 19 40 87
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
44
TABLE 7-3: EA WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.7 97 210 452
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.1 76 164 353
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.3 67 145 313
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 37 79 170
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.4 43 92 197
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 32 70 150
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.7 52 112 240
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.2 41 88 190
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.2 21 45 97
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.5 37 80 173
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 36 78 167
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 168
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 66.7 33 70 152
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 65.7 28 60 129
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.1 25 55 118
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.1 47 101 217
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.4 42 91 196
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.0 46 100 214
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 71 153
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.9 21 46 99
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 61.6 14 30 66
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 62.7 17 36 77
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 54.7 4 8 18
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.9 23 50 108
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
45
TABLE 7-4: EA WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.8 99 212 458
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.3 78 168 361
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.6 70 150 324
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.7 38 82 176
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.7 45 96 207
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 167
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 70.4 57 124 266
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.3 48 104 224
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.9 23 51 109
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.7 38 83 178
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.6 38 81 175
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.8 38 83 178
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 67.1 35 75 161
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.4 31 67 143
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 26 56 121
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.2 48 103 222
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 51 110 236
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.2 42 90 194
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.6 43 93 201
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.2 48 104 223
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.9 34 73 157
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.2 22 48 104
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 62.3 16 34 73
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.4 22 47 101
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 59.4 8 17 37
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.6 26 56 121
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
46
TABLE 7-5: EAC 2021 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 106 228 492
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.8 85 183 394
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 73 158 340
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 34 74 159
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 38 81 175
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 32 70 150
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.3 49 105 225
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.4 42 91 196
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 63.7 19 42 91
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 43 93 201
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 38 83 178
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 35 76 165
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 66.2 30 65 139
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.3 31 66 142
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 29 63 135
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.1 55 119 256
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 39 85 183
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.5 43 93 200
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.3 42 89 193
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.0 29 63 137
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.5 17 37 80
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 63.7 19 42 91
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.8 20 43 92
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.3 4 9 20
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.7 19 42 91
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
47
TABLE 7-6: EAC 2021 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 106 229 493
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.9 85 183 395
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 74 159 343
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 35 75 161
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.7 38 82 176
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.8 33 72 154
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.5 50 108 232
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.7 44 95 205
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.0 20 44 94
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 44 94 202
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 39 83 180
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 36 77 166
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 66.3 31 66 142
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.3 31 66 142
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 29 63 135
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 55 119 257
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 39 85 183
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.6 43 93 201
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.4 42 91 195
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.1 30 64 138
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.7 18 38 82
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.0 20 44 94
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.3 21 46 98
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 56.4 5 11 23
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.1 21 44 96
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
48
TABLE 7-7: EAC 2023 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 110 237 510
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.1 88 189 407
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 77 166 357
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.6 37 80 172
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 42 89 193
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 35 76 165
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.8 52 113 243
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.9 46 99 212
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.3 21 46 99
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 44 95 205
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 41 88 189
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.0 40 86 186
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 67.6 37 80 172
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.5 37 79 170
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 172
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 55 119 257
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 53 114 246
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.9 46 99 212
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.8 45 97 210
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 71 153
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.4 19 42 90
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.1 21 44 96
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.2 21 45 97
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.9 5 10 21
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.3 21 46 99
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
49
TABLE 7-8: EAC 2023 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 110 237 511
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.1 88 190 409
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 78 167 360
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.6 37 80 173
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 42 90 194
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 168
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 70.0 54 116 250
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.2 48 104 223
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.6 22 48 104
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 44 96 206
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 41 88 190
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 40 87 187
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 67.6 37 80 173
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 173
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 172
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 56 120 258
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 53 114 246
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.0 46 99 213
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.9 46 99 212
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 72 154
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.5 20 43 92
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.4 22 47 101
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.6 22 48 104
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 56.9 5 12 25
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.7 23 49 105
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
50
TABLE 7-9: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 116 249 537
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 92 198 426
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 82 176 380
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 41 89 191
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 47 102 220
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.0 40 86 186
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 70.5 58 126 271
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 50 107 231
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 24 53 113
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 46 98 211
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 44 95 204
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 46 100 216
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 68.9 46 99 212
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 44 95 205
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 46 99 212
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 56 120 259
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 122 263
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 44 96 206
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.5 50 107 231
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 51 109 235
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 38 81 175
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.4 23 50 107
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 22 48 103
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.8 23 49 107
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 6 12 26
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 25 54 117
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
51
TABLE 7-10: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 117 252 542
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.5 94 201 434
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.8 84 181 389
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.4 43 92 197
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.4 49 106 228
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.6 43 93 201
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 71.1 64 137 295
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 70.3 56 122 262
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.8 27 58 125
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.9 47 100 216
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.8 46 98 211
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.2 48 104 223
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 69.2 47 102 220
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 69.1 47 101 218
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.0 46 100 214
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 123 264
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.4 57 123 265
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.7 45 97 208
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.6 50 109 234
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.8 52 113 244
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.8 38 83 178
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.7 24 52 112
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.9 23 51 109
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 65.9 27 59 127
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 60.5 9 20 43
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.2 28 61 131
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
52
TABLE 7-11: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 146 314 676
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.6 111 239 515
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.3 106 229 494
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.4 67 145 312
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.0 86 185 398
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.7 70 150 323
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 74.2 103 222 477
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 72.8 83 180 387
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.8 49 107 230
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.2 48 104 224
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 57 123 264
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 72.9 84 181 389
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 73.3 89 192 414
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 71.9 72 155 334
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 76 163 351
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 56 121 261
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 77 167 360
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 60 129 278
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.0 74 158 341
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.7 82 176 380
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.4 57 124 266
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.1 55 119 256
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 67.8 36 78 168
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 67.9 37 79 171
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.1 40 87 188
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.6 56 120 259
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
53
TABLE 7-12: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at
Nearest
Adjacent
Land Use
(dBA)2
Distance to Contour
from Centerline (Feet)
70
dBA
CNEL
65
dBA
CNEL
60
dBA
CNEL
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 147 316 680
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.7 113 243 522
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.4 108 233 502
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.5 68 147 317
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.1 87 187 403
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.9 72 156 335
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 74.4 107 230 496
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 73.2 89 191 411
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 70.0 51 110 238
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.3 49 106 229
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.4 58 126 271
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 73.0 85 183 395
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 73.4 90 195 419
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 72.1 74 160 344
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 76 164 353
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.4 57 124 266
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 78 168 361
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 60 130 280
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.1 74 160 344
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.8 83 180 387
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.5 58 125 269
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.2 56 120 259
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 68.0 37 81 174
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 68.5 40 87 187
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.3 42 90 195
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.8 58 125 268
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use.
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road.
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
54
7.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
An analysis of existing traffic noise levels plus traffic noise generated by the proposed Project has
been included in this report for informational purposes. However, the analysis of existing traffic
noise levels plus traffic noise generated by the proposed Project scenario will not actually occur
since the Project would not be fully constructed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and operational until year 2026
cumulative conditions. Table 7-1 presents the Existing without Project conditions CNEL noise
levels. The without Project exterior noise levels are expected to range from 46.9 to 71.8 dBA
CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or
topography.
Table 7-2 shows the Existing with Project conditions will range from 58.0 to 71.9 dBA CNEL. As
shown on Table 7-7 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 11.1 dBA CNEL on the
study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project-related
noise level increases are considered potentially significant under Existing with Project conditions
at the following two roadway segments:
• Madison Street north of Avenue 58 (Segment 8)
• Avenue 60 west of Madison Street (Segment 27)
All other roadway segments are shown to experience less than significant noise level impacts
under Existing plus Project conditions. However, this scenario is provided solely for analytical
purposes and will not occur, since the Project will not be full developed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and
occupied under Existing 2019 conditions. Therefore, no mitigation measures are considered to
reduce the Existing with Project condition traffic noise level increases, and impacts are
considered less than significant since they will not actually occur.
Note that the Existing and Existing plus Ambient (EA) with Project conditions both assume the
Project will be built and fully occupied for the purposes of analysis and consistency with the The
Wave – Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis. (2) The long-range conditions under EA plus
Cumulative and General Plan 2040 scenarios represent the expected cumulative conditions
without and with Project traffic, and therefore, these long-range scenarios are used to determine
the significance of Project off-site traffic noise level increases on the study area roadway
segments, per CEQA Guideline A as previously discussed in Section 4.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
55
TABLE 7-13: EXISTING 2019 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.8 71.9 0.1 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.3 70.5 0.2 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.3 69.6 0.3 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 65.6 66.0 0.4 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 66.8 0.5 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 64.4 65.5 1.1 3.0 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 67.6 68.7 1.1 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 66.2 67.8 1.6 1.5 Yes
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 61.5 62.9 1.4 3.0 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.2 66.4 0.2 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.1 65.5 0.4 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.0 65.6 0.6 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 63.8 64.5 0.7 3.0 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 63.2 64.3 1.1 3.0 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.2 62.5 0.3 3.0 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.0 69.2 0.2 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.4 68.5 0.1 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.1 66.2 0.1 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 66.9 67.1 0.2 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.3 67.7 0.4 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.2 65.4 0.2 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 60.9 61.5 0.6 3.0 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 59.1 60.4 1.3 5.0 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 60.6 63.1 2.5 3.0 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 61.6 63.3 1.7 3.0 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.5 62.0 1.5 3.0 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 46.9 58.0 11.1 5.0 Yes
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 62.1 63.5 1.4 3.0 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
56
7.3 EA PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Table 7-3 presents the EA without Project conditions CNEL noise levels which are expected to
range from 54.7 to 72.7 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such
as noise barriers or topography.
Table 7-4 shows the EA with Project conditions will range from 59.4 to 72.8 dBA CNEL. As shown
on Table 7-14 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 4.7 dBA CNEL on the study
area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project-related noise
level increases are considered less than significant under EA with Project conditions at the land
uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
57
TABLE 7-14: EA OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.7 72.8 0.1 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.1 71.3 0.2 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.4 70.6 0.2 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 67.7 0.2 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.4 68.7 0.3 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 67.4 0.7 1.5 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.7 70.4 0.7 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.2 69.3 1.1 1.5 No
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.1 64.9 0.8 3.0 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.5 66.7 0.2 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 66.6 0.3 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 67.8 0.4 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 66.7 67.1 0.4 1.5 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 65.8 66.4 0.6 1.5 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.1 65.2 0.1 1.5 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.1 69.2 0.1 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 67.2 0.1 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.4 68.6 0.2 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.0 69.3 0.3 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 66.9 0.1 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.9 64.2 0.3 3.0 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 61.5 62.3 0.8 3.0 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 62.8 64.5 1.7 3.0 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 64.8 65.7 0.9 3.0 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 63.2 64.1 0.9 3.0 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 54.7 59.4 4.7 5.0 No
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.8 65.6 0.8 3.0 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
58
7.4 EAC 2021 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Table 7-5 presents the EAC 2021 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to
range from 55.3 to 73.3 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such
as noise barriers or topography.
Table 7-6 shows the EAC 2021 with Project conditions will range from 56.4 to 73.3 dBA CNEL. As
shown on Table 7-15 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 1.1 dBA CNEL on the
study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project-related
noise level increases are considered less than significant under EAC 2021 with Project conditions
at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
59
TABLE 7-15: EAC 2021 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 73.3 0.0 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.8 71.9 0.1 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 70.9 0.0 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 67.7 0.1 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 66.8 0.1 1.5 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.3 69.5 0.2 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.4 68.7 0.3 1.5 No
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 63.7 64.0 0.3 3.0 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 67.5 0.0 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 66.7 0.0 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.2 67.3 0.1 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 66.2 66.3 0.1 1.5 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.2 66.3 0.1 1.5 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 66.0 0.0 1.5 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.1 70.2 0.1 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 66.8 0.0 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.5 68.6 0.1 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.3 68.4 0.1 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.0 66.1 0.1 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.5 62.7 0.2 3.0 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 63.8 64.1 0.3 3.0 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.8 64.3 0.5 3.0 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.3 63.6 0.3 3.0 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.2 62.6 0.4 3.0 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.3 56.4 1.1 5.0 No
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.7 64.1 0.4 3.0 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
60
7.5 EAC 2023 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Table 7-7 presents the EAC 2023 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to
range from 55.9 to 73.5 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such
as noise barriers or topography.
Table 7-8 shows the EAC 2023 with Project conditions will range from 56.9 to 73.5 dBA CNEL. As
shown on Table 7-16 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 1.0 dBA CNEL on the
study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project-related
noise level increases are considered less than significant under EAC 2023 with Project conditions
at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
61
TABLE 7-16: EAC 2023 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 73.5 0.0 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.0 72.1 0.1 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 71.2 0.0 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 67.6 0.1 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 68.3 0.0 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 67.4 0.1 1.5 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 69.8 70.0 0.2 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.8 69.2 0.4 1.5 No
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.3 64.6 0.3 3.0 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.0 68.1 0.1 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.5 67.6 0.1 1.5 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 70.2 0.0 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 69.9 0.0 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.9 69.0 0.1 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.8 68.9 0.1 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 66.8 0.0 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.4 63.5 0.1 3.0 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.0 64.4 0.4 3.0 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.2 64.6 0.4 3.0 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 64.6 64.8 0.2 3.0 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 63.0 63.3 0.3 3.0 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.9 56.9 1.0 5.0 No
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.3 64.7 0.4 3.0 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
62
7.6 EAC 2026 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Table 7-9 presents the EAC 2026 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to
range from 57.3 to 73.9 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such
as noise barriers or topography.
Table 7-10 shows the EAC 2026 with Project conditions will range from 60.5 to 73.9 dBA CNEL.
As shown on Table 7-17 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 3.2 dBA CNEL on
the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project-
related noise level increases are considered less than significant under EAC 2026 with Project
conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
63
TABLE 7-17: EAC 2026 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 73.9 0.0 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 72.5 0.1 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 71.8 0.2 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 68.4 0.2 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 69.4 0.2 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 68.6 0.5 1.5 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 70.5 71.1 0.6 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 70.3 0.8 1.5 No
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 65.8 0.6 1.5 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 67.9 0.1 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 69.2 0.2 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 68.9 69.2 0.3 1.5 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 69.1 0.4 1.5 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 69.0 0.1 1.5 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 70.3 0.1 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 70.4 0.1 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 67.7 0.1 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.4 69.6 0.2 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 69.8 0.2 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.3 64.7 0.4 3.0 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 64.9 0.3 3.0 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.7 65.9 1.2 3.0 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 65.9 66.6 0.7 1.5 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 64.2 64.9 0.7 3.0 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 60.5 3.2 5.0 No
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 66.2 0.8 1.5 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
64
7.7 GENERAL PLAN 2040 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Table 7-11 presents the General Plan 2040 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are
expected to range from 67.8 to 75.4 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation
features such as noise barriers or topography.
Table 7-12 shows the General Plan 2040 with Project conditions will range from 68.0 to 75.4 dBA
CNEL. As shown on Table 7-18 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 0.6 dBA
CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the
Project-related noise level increases are considered less than significant under General Plan 2040
with Project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
65
TABLE 7-18: GENERAL PLAN 2040 OFF-SITE PROJECT-RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS
ID Road Segment Adjacent
Land Use1
CNEL at Adjacent
Land Use (dBA)2
Off-Site
Traffic
Noise
Threshold3
Threshold
Exceeded?3 No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 75.4 0.0 1.5 No
2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.6 73.7 0.1 1.5 No
3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.3 73.4 0.1 1.5 No
4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.4 71.5 0.1 1.5 No
5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.0 73.1 0.1 1.5 No
6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.7 71.9 0.2 1.5 No
7 Madison St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR/OS 74.2 74.4 0.2 1.5 No
8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 72.8 73.2 0.4 1.5 No
9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.8 70.0 0.2 1.5 No
10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.2 68.3 0.1 1.5 No
11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 69.4 0.2 1.5 No
12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 72.9 73.0 0.1 1.5 No
13 Monroe St. n/o Airport Bl. LDR 73.3 73.4 0.1 1.5 No
14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 71.9 72.1 0.2 1.5 No
15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 72.2 0.0 1.5 No
16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 70.4 0.1 1.5 No
17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 72.4 0.0 1.5 No
18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No
19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.0 72.1 0.1 1.5 No
20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.7 72.8 0.1 1.5 No
21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.4 70.5 0.1 1.5 No
22 Airport Bl. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.1 70.2 0.1 1.5 No
23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 67.8 68.0 0.2 1.5 No
24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 67.9 68.5 0.6 1.5 No
25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 71.6 71.8 0.2 1.5 No
26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 68.8 69.0 0.2 1.5 No
27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.1 70.3 0.2 1.5 No
28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.6 70.8 0.2 1.5 No
1 Source: City of La Quinta General Plan.
2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use.
3 Significance Criteria (Section 4).
"LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial;
"MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
66
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
67
8 ON-SITE NOISE IMPACTS
An on-site exterior noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the noise exposure
levels that would result from adjacent traffic noise sources in the Project study area, and to
identify potential noise mitigation measures that would achieve acceptable Project exterior and
interior noise levels. The primary source of traffic noise affecting the Project site is anticipated
to be from Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The Project will also experience some background
traffic noise impacts from its internal streets and parking lots, however, due to the low traffic
volume and low speeds of vehicles travelling on these roadways, traffic noise will not make a
significant contribution to the noise environment beyond of the right-of-way of each road.
8.1 EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS
Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Tables 6-3 to 6-5,
the expected future exterior noise levels for the on-site building were calculated. Table 8-1
presents a summary of future exterior noise level impacts for the future low-density residential
development within Planning Area VIII. The on-site traffic noise level impacts indicate that the
single-family residential development adjacent to Avenue 58 and Madison Street will experience
unmitigated exterior noise levels ranging from 66.7 to 68.8 dBA CNEL. Since the unmitigated on-
site traffic noise levels exceed the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards,
the on-site traffic noise impacts are considered potentially significant.
TABLE 8-1: UNMITIGATED EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS
Receiver
Location Roadway
Unmitigated
Noise Level
(dBA CNEL)1
Exterior Noise
Level Threshold
(dBA CNEL)2
Threshold
Exceeded?
Planning Area VIII-LDR
Avenue 58 66.7 65 Yes
Madison Street 68.8 65 Yes
1 On-site traffic noise calculations included in Appendix 8.1.
2 City of La Quinta exterior noise criteria (See Section 4).
To satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for residential land
use, the construction of 6-foot high noise barriers is required for the outdoor living areas
(backyards) of single-family residential uses adjacent to Avenue 58 and Madison Street in
Planning Area VIII. With the recommended noise barriers shown on Exhibit ES-A, the mitigated
future exterior noise levels at the outdoor living areas (backyards) of single-family residential
uses in Planning Area VIII will be reduced to levels ranging from 57.4 to 59.4 dBA CNEL as shown
on Table 8-2.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
68
TABLE 8-2: MITIGATED EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS
Receiver
Location Roadway
Mitigated
Noise Level
(dBA CNEL)1
Exterior Noise
Level Threshold
(dBA CNEL)2
Threshold
Exceeded?
Barrier
Height
(Feet)
Planning Area VIII-LDR
Avenue 58 57.4 65 No 6.0
Madison Street 59.4 65 No 6.0
1 On-site traffic noise calculations included in Appendix 8.1.
2 City of La Quinta exterior noise criteria (See Section 4).
With the planned noise barriers shown on Exhibit ES-A, the future exterior noise levels represent
a less than significant noise impact. This noise analysis shows that the planned noise barriers will
satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards. The effective noise
barrier height represents the minimum wall and/or berm combination height to satisfy the City
of La Quinta exterior noise level standards. The on-site traffic noise analysis calculations are
provided in Appendix 8.1.
8.2 INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS
To ensure that the interior noise levels comply with the City of La Quinta interior noise level
standards, future noise levels were calculated at the estimated building façade locations.
8.2.1 NOISE REDUCTION METHODOLOGY
The interior noise level is the difference between the predicted exterior noise level at the building
facade and the noise reduction of the structure. Typical building construction will provide a Noise
Reduction (NR) of approximately 12 dBA with "windows open" and a minimum 25 dBA noise
reduction with "windows closed." (24; 25) However, sound leaks, cracks and openings within the
window assembly can greatly diminish its effectiveness in reducing noise. Several methods are
used to improve interior noise reduction, including: (1) weather-stripped solid core exterior
doors; (2) upgraded dual glazed windows; (3) mechanical ventilation/air conditioning; and (4)
exterior wall/roof assembles free of cut outs or openings.
8.2.2 INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT
Table 8-2 shows that the Project buildings will require a windows-closed condition and a means
of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning). Table 8-2 shows that the future exterior noise
levels at the building façades are expected to range from 59.5 to 66.2 dBA CNEL. The interior
noise level analysis shows that the City of La Quinta 45 dBA CNEL residential interior noise
standards can be satisfied using standard STC ratings of 27 for all lots/units. Therefore, the future
on-site interior traffic noise impacts will be less than significant.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
69
TABLE 8-3: UNMITIGATED INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL)
Building
(Façade) Floor
Noise
Level
at Façade1
Required
Interior
NR2
Minimum
Estimated
Interior
NR3
Upgraded
Windows4
Interior
Noise
Level5
Threshold Threshold
Exceeded?
Avenue 58 1 56.3 11.3 25 No 31.3 45 No
2 65.5 20.5 25 No 40.5 45 No
Madison St.
1 58.3 13.3 25 No 33.3 45 No
2 67.5 22.5 25 No 42.5 45 No
1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning).
2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard for residential uses.
3 Estimated minimum interior noise reduction with the recommended windows and standard building construction.
4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27?
5 Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows.
"NR" = Noise Reduction
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
70
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
71
9 SENSITIVE RECEIVER LOCATIONS
To assess the potential for long-term operational and short-term construction noise impacts, the
following sensitive receiver locations, as shown on Exhibit 8-A, were identified as representative
locations for analysis. Sensitive receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside
or where the presence of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land.
Noise-sensitive land uses are generally considered to include schools, hospitals, single-family
dwellings, mobile home parks, churches, libraries, and recreation areas. Moderately noise-
sensitive land uses typically include multi-family dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, out-
patient clinics, cemeteries, golf courses, country clubs, athletic/tennis clubs, and equestrian
clubs. Land uses that are considered relatively insensitive to noise include business, commercial,
and professional developments. Land uses that are typically not affected by noise include:
industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, parking lots, warehousing,
liquid and solid waste facilities, salvage yards, and transit terminals.
Receiver locations are located in outdoor living areas (e.g., backyards) at 10 feet from any existing
or proposed barriers or at the building façade, whichever is closer to the Project site, based on
FHWA guidance, and consistent with additional guidance provided by Caltrans and the FTA, as
previously described in Section 5.2. Sensitive receiver locations in the Project study area include
the nearby residential uses, as described below. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study
area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise study will experience
lower noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from
distance and the shielding of intervening structures.
R1: Located approximately 154 feet north of the Project site, R1 represents existing
residential homes north of 58th Avenue. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near
this location, L1, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R2: Location R2 represents the existing residential homes located north of the Project site at
roughly 181 feet, on the north side of 58th Avenue. A 24-hour noise measurement was
taken near this location, L2, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R3: Location R3 represents the existing residential homes northeast of the intersection at
58th Avenue and Madison Street at approximately 231 feet from the Project site. A 24-
hour noise measurement near this location, L3, is used to describe the existing ambient
noise environment.
R4: Location R4 represents the existing residential homes southeast of the intersection at
58th Avenue and Madison Street at approximately 185 feet from the Project site. A 24-
hour noise measurement near this location, L4, is used to describe the existing ambient
noise environment.
R5: Location R5 represents the existing residential homes on the east side of Madison Street
at approximately 352 feet from the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken
near this location, L5, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R6: Location R6 represents the existing residential home located north of CII Conchita about
134 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location,
L6, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
72
R7: Location R7 represents the existing residential homes located north of Avenue 60 about
37 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location,
L7, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R8: Location R8 represents the existing residential homes located south of Avenue 60 about
38 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location,
L8, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R9: Location R9 represents the existing residential homes located about 1,451 feet west of
the Project site along Quarry Ranch Road. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near
this location, L9, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
R10: Location R10 represents the existing residential homes located about 1,378 feet
northwest of the Project site north of 58th Avenue. A 24 -hour noise measurement was
taken near this location, L10, to describe the existing ambient noise environment.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
73
EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
74
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
75
10 OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS
This section analyzes the potential stationary-source operational noise impacts at the nearby
receiver locations, identified in Section 9, resulting from operation of the proposed The Wave –
Coral Mountain Project. Exhibit 10-A identifies the representative receiver locations and noise
source locations used to assess the operational noise levels. Appendix 10.1 includes the detailed
calculations for the Project operational noise levels presented in this section.
10.1 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were
collected from similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the
development of the proposed Project. This section provides a detailed description of the
reference noise level measurements shown on Table 10-1 used to estimate the Project
operational noise impacts. It is important to note that the following projected noise levels
assume the worst-case noise environment with the surf lagoon/wave machine activity, outdoor
pool/spa activity, parking lot vehicles, outdoor field activities, roof-top air conditioning units and
special event activity all operating simultaneously. These noise level impacts will likely vary
throughout the day.
10.1.1 SURF LAGOON/WAVE MACHINE ACTIVITY
To describe the surf lagoon/wave machine activity, this analysis relies on proprietary reference
noise level limit and measurement data. The proposed surf lagoon/wave machine is designed to
limit objectionable random noises such as squeaks, rattling, panel drumming, hydraulic valve
squealing and/or water hammer, etc. and/or abnormal noise emissions. In addition, the
applicant has established exterior noise limits to ensure that all moving and/or rotating
equipment is quiet in operation and will not negatively impact guest and/or personnel areas.
Using the data supplied by the applicant, a maximum noise level limit of 77.6 dBA Leq at 50 feet
is used to describe the exterior noise levels trackside and outside the winch house. Sample noise
level measurements provided by the applicant suggest that the actual noise levels will be less
than 70.6 dBA Leq when measured at 12 feet.
10.2.2 OUTDOOR POOL/SPA ACTIVITY
To determine the noise levels associated with outdoor hotel pool and spa activity, Urban
Crossroads collected a reference noise level measurement on March 16th, 2005 at the Westin
Hotel in the City of Rancho Mirage. The measured reference noise level at 50 feet is 57.8 dBA
Leq. The outdoor pool/spa activity noise levels include a waterfall, people talking, and children
and adults swimming and playing in a pool.
10.2.3 PARKING LOT VEHICLE MOVEMENTS
To determine the noise levels associated with parking lot vehicle movements, Urban Crossroads
collected reference noise level measurements over a 24-hour period on May 17th, 2017 at the
parking lot for the Panasonic Avionics Corporation in the City of Lake Forest. T he peak hour of
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
76
activity measured over the 24-hour noise level measurement period occurred between 12:00
p.m. to 1:00 p.m., or the typical lunch hour for employees working in the area. The measured
reference noise level at 50 feet from parking lot vehicle movements was measured at 41.7 dBA
Leq. The parking lot noise levels are mainly due to cars pulling in and out of spaces during peak
lunch hour activity and employees talking.
10.1.4 OUTDOOR FIELD ACTIVITIES
To represent the potential noise level impacts associated with the Project’s outdoor game field
activities, a reference noise level measurement was collected on Wednesday, October 8th, 2014
at the Founders Park in the unincorporated community of Ladera Ranch in the County of Orange.
The reference noise levels collected at the Founders Park are expected to overestimate the noise
level activities within the outdoor fields and game areas at the Project site, since the reference
noise level measurement includes parents speaking on cell phones, kids playing, and background
youth soccer games, with coaches shouting instructions and people cheering and clapping. Using
the uniform reference distance of 50 feet, the reference playground activity noise level is 43.4
dBA Leq.
10.1.5 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
To describe the potential noise level impacts associated the proposed neighborhood commercial
center a reference noise level measurement was collected at the Destination Ramon Commercial
Center in Cathedral City on April 18, 2018. The noise level measurements collected show a peak
hourly noise level of 54.8 dBA Leq when measured at 50 feet.
TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
Noise Source Duration
(hh:mm:ss)
Ref.
Distance
(Feet)
Noise
Source
Height
(Feet)
Hourly
Activity (Mins.)6
Reference Noise
Level (dBA Leq)
Sound
Power
Level
(dBA)7 Day Night @ Ref.
Dist.
@ 50
Feet
Surf Lagoon/Wave Machine1 01:00:00 12' 5' 60 60 90.0 77.6 109.3
Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity2 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 60 77.8 57.8 89.5
Parking Lot Vehicle Movements3 01:00:00 20' 5' 60 60 58.0 50.0 84.6
Outdoor Game Activity4 00:15:00 5' 5' 60 60 63.4 43.4 78.0
Neighborhood Commercial5 00:01:00 20' 5' 60 60 62.8 54.8 89.4
1 Source: Proprietary reference noise level limit and measurement data.
2 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 3/16/2005 at the Westin Hotel in the City of Rancho Mirage.
3 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 5/17/2017 at the Staybridge Suites in the City of Lake Forest.
4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 10/8/2014 by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at the Founder's Park in the County of Orange.
5 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 4/18/2018 by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at Destination Ramon Commercial Center
6 Anticipated minutes of activity within a given hour based on the reference noise source activity.
7 Calculated using the CadnaA noise model at the reference distance to the noise source.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
77
10.2 CADNAA NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
To fully describe the exterior operational noise levels from the Project, Urban Crossroads, Inc.
developed a noise prediction model using the CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement)
computer program. CadnaA can analyze the noise level of multiple types of noise sources and
calculates the noise levels at any location using the spatially accurate Project site plan and
includes the effects of topography, buildings, and multiple barriers in its calculations using the
latest standards to predict outdoor noise impacts.
Using the spatially accurate Project site plan and flown aerial imagery from Nearmap, a CadnaA
noise prediction model of the Project study area was developed. The noise model provides a
three-dimensional representation of the Project study area using the following key data inputs:
• Ground absorption;
• Multiple reflections at buildings and barriers;
• Reference noise level sources by type (area, point, etc.) and noise source height;
• Multiple noise receiver locations and heights;
• Topography and earthen berms;
• Barrier and building heights.
Based on these data inputs, the CadnaA noise prediction model will calculate the distance from
each noise source to the noise receiver locations, using the ground absorption, distance, and
barrier/building attenuation inputs to provide a summary of noise level calculations at each
receiver location and the partial noise level contributions by noise source. The reference sound
power level (PWL) for the highest noise source expected at the Project site was input into the
CadnaA noise prediction model.
While sound pressure levels (e.g. Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at
a reference distance, sound power levels (PWL) are connected to the sound source and are
independent of distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source,
and also diminish as a result of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other
factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute
value that is not affected by the environment.
The operational noise level calculations provided in this noise study account for the distance
attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source
(i.e., a point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. Hard site conditions
are used in the operational noise analysis which result in noise levels that attenuate (or decrease)
at a rate of 6.0 dBA for each doubling of distance from a point source, based on existing
conditions in the Project study area. Appendix 10.1 includes the CadnaA noise model inputs and
calculation data.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
78
10.3 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS
As indicated on Table 10-2, the typical Project-only operational noise levels will range from 35.3
to 49.7 dBA Leq at the receiver locations. Table 10-2 also shows the operational noise levels
associated with The Wave – Coral Mountain Project will satisfy the City of La Quinta base exterior
noise level standards at all nearby receiver locations.
TABLE 10-2: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT-ONLY OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS
Receiver
Location1
Land
Use
Noise Level
at Receiver
Locations
(dBA Leq)2
Threshold Exceeded?3
Daytime
(55 dBA Leq)
Nighttime
(45 dBA Leq)
R1 Residential 36.3 No No
R2 Residential 38.4 No No
R3 Residential 36.1 No No
R4 Residential 35.8 No No
R5 Residential 36.2 No No
R6 Residential 46.8 No Yes
R7 Residential 45.7 No Yes
R8 Residential 47.9 No Yes
R9 Residential 20.1 No No
R10 Residential 35.0 No No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the receiver and noise source locations.
2 Estimated Project operational noise levels with typical activities (Appendix 9.1).
3 Do the estimated Project operational noise levels meet the operational noise level standards?
"Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
79
EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE LOCATIONS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
80
10.4 TYPICAL PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
To describe the Project operational noise level contributions, the Project operational noise levels
are combined with the existing ambient noise levels measurements for the nearby receiver
locations potentially impacted by Project operational noise sources. Since the units used to
measure noise, decibels (dB), are logarithmic units, the Project-operational and existing ambient
noise levels cannot be combined using standard arithmetic equations. (4) Instead, they must be
logarithmically added using the following base equation:
SPLTotal = 10log10[10SPL1/10 + 10SPL2/10 + … 10SPLn/10]
Where “SPL1,” “SPL2,” etc. are equal to the sound pressure levels being combined, or in this case,
the Project-operational and existing ambient noise levels. The difference between the combined
Project and ambient noise levels describe the Project noise level contributions to the existing
ambient noise environment. Noise levels that would be experienced at receiver locations when
Project-source noise is added to the daytime and nighttime ambient conditions are presented on
Tables 10-3 and 10-4, respectively.
As indicated on Tables 10-3 the Project will generate unmitigated daytime operational noise level
increase of up to 3.5 dBA Leq at the nearby receiver locations, which will satisfy the daytime
significance criteria presented in Table 4-2. Since the Project-related operational noise level
contributions will satisfy the operational noise level increase significance criteria presented in
Table 4-2 under long-range typical operational conditions, the increases at the receiver locations
will be less than significant during daytime operations.
However, as shown on Table 10-4 the Project will generate unmitigated nighttime operational
noise level increases of up to 8.6 dBA Leq at the receiver location R8, which will exceed the
nighttime significance criteria presented in Table 4-2. Therefore, operational noise mitigation
measures are needed to reduce the potential nighttime noise level impacts at receiver location
R8. This may include restricting the nighttime surf lagoon/wave machine to the daytime hours
between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. or providing noise barriers near receiver location R8 at
southern project boundaries. With the nighttime noise mitigation measures, the Project
operational noise level increases at all receiver locations will be less than significant.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
81
TABLE 9-3: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT DAYTIME NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Receiver
Location1
Land
Use
Total Project
Operational
Noise Level2
Meas.
Location3
Reference
Ambient
Noise Levels4
Combined
Project and
Ambient5
Project
Increase6 Threshold7 Threshold
Exceeded?7
R1 Residential 36.3 L1 51.5 51.6 0.1 5.0 No
R2 Residential 38.4 L2 60.7 60.7 0.0 3.0 No
R3 Residential 36.1 L3 55.6 55.6 0.0 5.0 No
R4 Residential 35.8 L4 53.2 53.3 0.1 5.0 No
R5 Residential 36.2 L5 56.1 56.1 0.0 5.0 No
R6 Residential 46.8 L6 55.8 56.3 0.5 5.0 No
R7 Residential 45.7 L7 56.1 56.5 0.4 5.0 No
R8 Residential 47.9 L8 39.9 48.5 8.6 5.0 Yes
R9 Residential 20.1 L9 48.9 48.9 0.0 5.0 No
R10 Residential 35.0 L10 54.2 54.3 0.1 5.0 No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the sensitive receiver locations.
2 Total Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 9-2.
3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A.
4 Observed daytime ambient noise levels as shown on Table 5-1.
5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities.
6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities.
7 Significance Criteria as defined in Section 4.
TABLE 9-4: UNMITIGATED TYPICAL PROJECT NIGHTTIME NOISE LEVEL CONTRIBUTIONS
Receiver
Location1
Land
Use
Total Project
Operational
Noise Level2
Meas.
Location3
Reference
Ambient
Noise Levels4
Combined
Project and
Ambient5
Project
Increase6 Threshold7 Threshold
Exceeded?7
R1 Residential 36.3 L1 51.5 51.6 0.1 5.0 No
R2 Residential 38.4 L2 60.7 60.7 0.0 3.0 No
R3 Residential 36.1 L3 55.6 55.6 0.0 5.0 No
R4 Residential 35.8 L4 53.2 53.3 0.1 5.0 No
R5 Residential 36.2 L5 56.1 56.1 0.0 5.0 No
R6 Residential 46.8 L6 55.8 56.3 0.5 5.0 No
R7 Residential 45.7 L7 56.1 56.5 0.4 5.0 No
R8 Residential 47.9 L8 39.9 48.5 8.6 5.0 Yes
R9 Residential 20.1 L9 48.9 48.9 0.0 5.0 No
R10 Residential 35.0 L10 54.2 54.3 0.1 5.0 No
1 See Exhibit 9-A for the sensitive receiver locations.
2 Total Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 9-2.
3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A.
4 Observed daytime ambient noise levels as shown on Table 5-1.
5 Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities.
6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities.
7 Significance Criteria as defined in Section 4.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
82
EXHIBIT 10-B: UNMITIGATED PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
83
11 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities
associated with the development of the Project. Exhibit 11-A shows the construction noise
source locations in relation to the nearby sensitive receiver locations previously described in
Section 8.
Exhibit 11-A shows the construction noise source locations boundaries in relation to the nearby
sensitive receiver locations.
11.1 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS
Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of trucks,
power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high
levels. The number and mix of construction equipment is expected to occur in the following
stages:
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken
by Urban Crossroads, Inc. to describe the typical construction activity noise levels for each stage
of Project construction. The construction reference noise level measurements represent a list of
typical construction activity noise levels. Noise levels generated by heavy construction
equipment can range from approximately 68 dBA to more than 80 dBA when measured at 50
feet. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6
dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA measured at 50 feet from the
noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA at 100 feet from the source to the
receiver, and would be further reduced to 68 dBA at 200 feet from the source to the receiver.
11.2 CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
To describe the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar
activities at several construction sites. Table 11-1 provides a summary of the construction
reference noise level measurements. Since the reference noise levels were collected at varying
distances, all construction noise level measurements presented on Table 11-1 have been
adjusted to describe a uniform reference distance of 50 feet.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
84
TABLE 11-1: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS
ID Noise Source Duration
(h:mm:ss)
Reference
Distance
From
Source
(Feet)
Reference
Noise Levels
@ Reference
Distance
(dBA Leq)
Reference
Noise Levels
@ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)5
1 Truck Pass-Bys & Background Dozer Activity1 0:01:15 30' 63.6 59.2
2 Dozer Activity1 0:01:00 30' 68.6 64.2
3 Construction Vehicle Maintenance Activities2 0:01:00 30' 71.9 67.5
4 Foundation Trenching2 0:01:01 30' 72.6 68.2
5 Rough Grading Activities2 0:05:00 30' 77.9 73.5
6 Framing3 0:02:00 30' 66.7 62.3
7 Concrete Mixer Truck Movements4 0:01:00 50' 71.2 71.2
8 Concrete Paver Activities4 0:01:00 30' 70.0 65.6
9 Concrete Mixer Pour & Paving Activities4 0:01:00 30' 70.3 65.9
10 Concrete Mixer Backup Alarms & Air Brakes4 0:00:20 50' 71.6 71.6
11 Concrete Mixer Pour Activities4 1:00:00 50' 67.7 67.7
1 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 10/14/15 at a business park construction site located at the northwest corner of Barranca Parkway and Alton
Parkway in the City of Irvine.
2 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 10/20/15 at a construction site located in Rancho Mission Viejo.
3 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 10/20/15 at a residential construction site located in Rancho Mission Viejo.
4 Reference noise level measurements were collected from a nighttime concrete pour at an industrial construction site, located at 27334 San Bernardino
Avenue in the City of Redlands, between 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on 7/1/15.
5 Reference noise levels are calculated at 50 feet using a drop off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance (point source).
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
85
EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
86
11.3 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS
Using the reference construction equipment noise levels, calculations of the Project construction
noise level impacts at the nearby receiver locations were completed. Tables 11-2 to 11-6 present
the short-term construction noise levels for each stage of construction. Table 11-7 provides a
summary of the construction noise levels by stage at the nearby noise-sensitive receiver
locations. Based on the stages of construction, the noise impacts associated with the proposed
Project are expected to create temporarily high noise levels at the nearby receiver locations. To
assess the worst-case construction noise levels, this analysis shows the highest noise impacts
when the equipment with the highest reference noise level is operating at the closest point from
the edge of primary construction activity to each receiver location.
TABLE 11-2: SITE PREPARATION ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS
Reference Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Truck Pass-Bys & Background Dozer Activity 59.2
Dozer Activity 64.2
Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet (dBA Leq): 64.2
Receiver
Location
Distance to
Construction
Activity
(Feet)2
Distance
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)3
Estimated
Noise Barrier
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)4
Construction
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
R1 220' -12.9 -5.0 46.3
R2 230' -13.3 -5.0 45.9
R3 440' -18.9 -5.0 40.3
R4 550' -20.8 -5.0 38.4
R5 360' -17.1 -5.0 42.1
R6 170' -10.6 0.0 53.6
R7 100' -6.0 -5.0 53.2
R8 100' -6.0 0.0 58.2
R9 1,510' -29.6 -5.0 29.6
R10 1,450' -29.2 -5.0 30.0
1 Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver.
3 Point (stationary) source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance.
4 Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers/berms in the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
87
TABLE 11-3: GRADING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS
Reference Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Truck Pass-Bys & Background Dozer Activity 59.2
Dozer Activity 64.2
Rough Grading Activities 73.5
Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet (dBA Leq): 73.5
Receiver
Location
Distance to
Construction
Activity
(Feet)2
Distance
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)3
Estimated
Noise Barrier
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)4
Construction
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
R1 220' -12.9 -5.0 55.6
R2 230' -13.3 -5.0 55.2
R3 440' -18.9 -5.0 49.6
R4 550' -20.8 -5.0 47.7
R5 360' -17.1 -5.0 51.4
R6 170' -10.6 0.0 62.9
R7 100' -6.0 -5.0 62.5
R8 100' -6.0 0.0 67.5
R9 1,510' -29.6 -5.0 38.9
R10 1,450' -29.2 -5.0 39.3
1 Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver.
3 Point (stationary) source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance.
4 Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers/berms in the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
88
TABLE 11-4: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS
Reference Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Construction Vehicle Maintenance Activities 67.5
Foundation Trenching 68.2
Framing 62.3
Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet (dBA Leq): 68.2
Receiver
Location
Distance to
Construction
Activity
(Feet)2
Distance
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)3
Estimated
Noise Barrier
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)4
Construction
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
R1 220' -12.9 -5.0 50.3
R2 230' -13.3 -5.0 49.9
R3 440' -18.9 -5.0 44.3
R4 550' -20.8 -5.0 42.4
R5 360' -17.1 -5.0 46.1
R6 170' -10.6 0.0 57.6
R7 100' -6.0 -5.0 57.2
R8 100' -6.0 0.0 62.2
R9 1,510' -29.6 -5.0 33.6
R10 1,450' -29.2 -5.0 34.0
1 Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver.
3 Point (stationary) source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance.
4 Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers/berms in the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
89
TABLE 11-5: ARCHITECTURAL COATING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS
Reference Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Construction Vehicle Maintenance Activities 67.5
Framing 62.3
Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet (dBA Leq): 67.5
Receiver
Location
Distance to
Construction
Activity
(Feet)2
Distance
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)3
Estimated
Noise Barrier
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)4
Construction
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
R1 220' -12.9 -5.0 49.6
R2 230' -13.3 -5.0 49.2
R3 440' -18.9 -5.0 43.6
R4 550' -20.8 -5.0 41.7
R5 360' -17.1 -5.0 45.4
R6 170' -10.6 0.0 56.9
R7 100' -6.0 -5.0 56.5
R8 100' -6.0 0.0 61.5
R9 1,510' -29.6 -5.0 32.9
R10 1,450' -29.2 -5.0 33.3
1 Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver.
3 Point (stationary) source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance.
4 Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers/berms in the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
90
TABLE 11-6: PAVING ACTIVITY NOISE LEVELS
Reference Construction Activity1
Reference Noise
Level @ 50 Feet
(dBA Leq)
Concrete Mixer Truck Movements 71.2
Concrete Paver Activities 65.6
Concrete Mixer Pour & Paving Activities 65.9
Concrete Mixer Backup Alarms & Air Brakes 71.6
Concrete Mixer Pour Activities 67.7
Highest Reference Noise Level at 50 Feet (dBA Leq): 71.6
Receiver
Location
Distance to
Construction
Activity
(Feet)2
Distance
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)3
Estimated
Noise Barrier
Attenuation
(dBA Leq)4
Construction
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
R1 220' -12.9 -5.0 53.7
R2 230' -13.3 -5.0 53.3
R3 440' -18.9 -5.0 47.7
R4 550' -20.8 -5.0 45.8
R5 360' -17.1 -5.0 49.5
R6 170' -10.6 0.0 61.0
R7 100' -6.0 -5.0 60.6
R8 100' -6.0 0.0 65.6
R9 1,510' -29.6 -5.0 37.0
R10 1,450' -29.2 -5.0 37.4
1 Reference construction noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.
2 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver.
3 Point (stationary) source drop off rate of 6.0 dBA per doubling of distance.
4 Estimated barrier attenuation from existing barriers/berms in the Project study area.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
91
TABLE 11-7: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY
Receiver
Location1
Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq)
Site
Preparation Grading Building
Construction
Architectural
Coating Paving
Highest
Activity
Noise Levels2
R1 46.3 55.6 50.3 49.6 53.7 55.6
R2 45.9 55.2 49.9 49.2 53.3 55.2
R3 40.3 49.6 44.3 43.6 47.7 49.6
R4 38.4 47.7 42.4 41.7 45.8 47.7
R5 42.1 51.4 46.1 45.4 49.5 51.4
R6 53.6 62.9 57.6 56.9 61.0 62.9
R7 53.2 62.5 57.2 56.5 60.6 62.5
R8 58.2 67.5 62.2 61.5 65.6 67.5
R9 29.6 38.9 33.6 32.9 37.0 38.9
R10 30.0 39.3 34.0 33.3 37.4 39.3
1 Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
92
11.4 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
The construction noise analysis shows that the highest construction noise levels will occur when
construction activities take place at the closest point from primary Project construction activity
to each of the nearby receiver locations. As shown on Table 11-8, the unmitigated construction
noise levels are expected to range from 38.9 to 67.5 dBA Leq at the nearby receiver locations.
To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term noise levels at
off-site sensitive receiver locations a construction-related the NIOSH noise level threshold of 85
dBA Leq is used as acceptable thresholds for construction noise at the nearby sensitive receiver
locations. Table 11-8 shows the highest construction noise levels at the potentially impacted
receiver locations are expected to approach 67.5 dBA Leq and will satisfy the NIOSH 85 dBA Leq
significance threshold during temporary Project construction activities. The noise impact due to
unmitigated Project construction noise levels is, therefore, considered a less than significant
impact at all nearby sensitive receiver locations.
TABLE 11-8: UNMITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE
Receiver
Location1
Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
Highest Construction
Noise Levels2 Threshold3 Threshold
Exceeded?4
R1 55.6 85 No
R2 55.2 85 No
R3 49.6 85 No
R4 47.7 85 No
R5 51.4 85 No
R6 62.9 85 No
R7 62.5 85 No
R8 67.5 85 No
R9 38.9 85 No
R10 39.3 85 No
1 Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions, as shown on Table 11-7.
3 Construction noise thresholds as shown on Table 4-2.
4 Do the estimated Project construction noise levels satisfy the construction noise level threshold?
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
93
11.5 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the
equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected
that ground-borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent,
localized intrusion. The proposed Project’s construction activities most likely to cause vibration
impacts are:
• Heavy Construction Equipment: Although all heavy mobile construction equipment has the
potential of causing at least some perceptible vibration while operating close to buildings, the
vibration is usually short-term and is not of sufficient magnitude to cause building damage.
• Trucks: Trucks hauling building materials to construction sites can be sources of vibration
intrusion if the haul routes pass through residential neighborhoods on streets with bumps or
potholes. Repairing the bumps and potholes generally eliminates the problem.
Ground-borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project
site were estimated by data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Construction
activities that would have the potential to generate low levels of ground-borne vibration within
the Project site include grading. Using the vibration source level of construction equipment
provided on Table 6-6 and the construction vibration assessment methodology published by the
FTA, it is possible to estimate the Project vibration impacts. Table 11-9 presents the expected
Project related vibration levels at the nearby receiver locations.
At distances ranging from 100 to 1,510 feet from Project construction activities, construction
vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.008 in/sec RMS and will remain below the
threshold of 0.01 in/sec RMS at all receiver locations, as shown on Table 11-9. Therefore, the
Project-related vibration impacts are considered less than significant during the construction
activities at the Project site.
Further, the Project-related construction vibration levels do not represent levels capable of
causing building damage to nearby residential homes. The FTA identifies construction vibration
levels capable of building damage ranging from 0.12 to 0.5 in/sec PPV. (11) The peak Project-
construction vibration levels shown on Table 11-9, approaching 0.011 in/sec PPV, are below the
FTA vibration levels for building damage at the residential homes near the Project site.
Moreover, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained
during the entire construction period but will occur rather only during the times that heavy
construction equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site perimeter.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
94
TABLE 11-9: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS
Receiver1
Distance
to
Const.
Activity
(Feet)
ReceiverLevels (in/sec) PPV2 RMS
Velocity
Levels
(in/sec)3
Threshold
(in/sec)
RMS4
Threshold
Exceeded?5 Small
Bulldozer
Jack-
hammer
Loaded
Trucks
Large
Bulldozer
Peak
Vibration
R1 220' 0.000 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.01 No
R2 230' 0.000 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.01 No
R3 440' 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 No
R4 550' 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 No
R5 360' 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.01 No
R6 170' 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.01 No
R7 100' 0.000 0.004 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.008 0.01 No
R8 100' 0.000 0.004 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.008 0.01 No
R9 1,510' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.01 No
R10 1,450' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.01 No
1 Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A.
2 Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 6-6.
3 Vibration levels in PPV are converted to RMS velocity using a 0.71 conversion factor identified in the Caltrans Transportation and
Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013.
4 Source: County of Riverside General Plan Noise Element, Policy N 16.3.
5 Does the vibration level exceed the maximum acceptable vibration threshold?
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
95
12 REFERENCES
1. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G. 2018.
2. Urban Crossroads, Inc. The Wave - Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis. October 2019.
3. Harris, Cyril M. Noise Control in Buildings. s.l. : McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.
4. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program. Technical Noise Supplement - A
Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Sacramento, CA : s.n., September 2013.
5. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on Levels of
Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of
Safety. March 1974. EPA/ONAC 550/9/74-004.
6. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and
Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and
Guidance. December 2011.
7. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Traffic Noise in the
United States, Problem and Response. April 2000. p. 3.
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Noise Effects
Handbook-A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise. October 1979 (revised July 1981).
EPA 550/9/82/106.
9. California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement. November 2009.
10. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Standard 29 CRF, Part 1910.
11. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment. September 2018.
12. Office of Planning and Research. State of California General Plan Guidelines. 2018.
13. City of La Quinta. General Plan Environmental Hazards Element, Noise. December 2013.
14. —. Municipal Code, Sections 9.100, 6.08.
15. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Criteria for Recommended Standard:
Occupational Noise Exposure. June 1998.
16. County of Riverside. General Plan Noise Element. December 2015.
17. California Court of Appeal. Gray v. County of Madera, F053661. 167 Cal.App.4th 1099; - Cal.Rptr.3d,
October 2008.
18. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis
Issues. August 1992.
19. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specification for Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.4-
2014/IEC 61672-1:2013.
20. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise
Prediction Model. December 1978. FHWA-RD-77-108.
21. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program, Office of Environmental
Engineering. Use of California Vehicle Noise Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels (Calveno REMELs)
in FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction. September 1995. TAN 95-03.
22. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Attenuation as a Function of Ground and
Vegetation Final Report. June 1995. FHWA/CA/TL-95/23.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
96
23. County of Riverside, Office of Industrial Hygiene. Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic
Noise Impacts to Residential Structures. April 2015.
24. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and
Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and
Guidance. June, 1995.
25. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. May 2011.
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
97
13 CERTIFICATION
The contents of this noise study report represent an accurate depiction of the noise environment
and impacts associated with the proposed The Wave – Coral Mountain Project. The information
contained in this noise study report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5979.
Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE
Principal
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
260 E. Baker Street, Suite 200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(949) 336-5979
blawson@urbanxroads.com
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • December, 1993
Bachelor of Science in City and Regional Planning
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • June, 1992
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
PE – Registered Professional Traffic Engineer – TR 2537 • January, 2009
AICP – American Institute of Certified Planners – 013011 • June, 1997–January 1, 2012
PTP – Professional Transportation Planner • May, 2007 – May, 2013
INCE – Institute of Noise Control Engineering • March, 2004
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
ASA – Acoustical Society of America
ITE – Institute of Transportation Engineers
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Acoustical Consultant – County of Orange • February, 2011
FHWA-NHI-142051 Highway Traffic Noise Certificate of Training • February, 2013
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
98
This page intentionally left blank
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 3.1:
CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE
99
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
100
La Quinta Municipal Code
Up Previous Next Main Search Print No Frames
Title 9 ZONING
Chapter 9.100 SUPPLEMENTAL NONRESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS
9.100.210 Noise control.
A. Purpose. The noise control standards for nonresidential land use districts set forth in this section are established to prevent excessive sound levels which
are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety or which are contrary to the public interest.
B. Noise Standards. Exterior noise standards are set forth below. Residential property, schools, hospitals, and churches are considered noise sensitive land
uses, regardless of the land use district in which they are located. All other uses shall comply with the “other nonresidential” standard. All noise measurements
shall be taken using standard noise measuring instruments. Measurements shall be taken within the receiving property at locations determined by director to
be most appropriate to the individual situation.
Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments
Land Uses
CNEL (dBA)
50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Residential – Single-Family Dwellings, Duplex, Mobile Homes
A
B
C
D
Residential – Multiple Family
A
B
C
D
Transient Lodging: Hotels and Motels
A
B
C
D
School Classrooms, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Convalescent
Hospitals
A
B
C
D
Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters
B
C
Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports
B
C
Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks
A
C
D
Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries
A
C
D
Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional
A
B
D
Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture
A
B
D
Source: California Department of Health Services, “Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan,” 1990.
101
Chart Legend
A Normally Acceptable: With no special noise reduction requirements assuming standard construction.
B Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is
made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.
C Normally Unacceptable: New construction is discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must
be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.
D Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.
Exterior Noise Standards
Receiving Land Use Noise Standard Time Period
Noise sensitive 65 dB(A)7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m.
50 dB(A)10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m.
Other nonresidential 75 dB(A)7:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m.
65 dB(A)10:00 p.m.—7:00 a.m.
If the noise consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech or music, or any combination thereof, each of the noise levels specified in the table in this
section shall be reduced by five dB(A).
C. Noise Limits. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned,
leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, when such noise causes the noise level, when measured on any adjacent property, to exceed:
1. The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour;
2. The noise standard plus five dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen minutes in any hour;
3. The noise standard plus ten dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour;
4. The noise standard plus fifteen dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or
5. The noise standard plus twenty dB(A) for any period of time.
For purposes of this section, the term “cumulative period” means the number of minutes that a noise occurs within any hour, whether such minutes are
consecutive or not.
D. Ambient Noise Level. If the ambient or background noise level exceeds any of the preceding noise categories, no increase above such ambient noise level
shall be permitted.
E. Exemptions. The following are exempt from the noise restrictions of this section:
1. Emergency vehicles or other emergency operations.
2. City maintenance, construction or similar activities.
3. Construction activities regulated by Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code.
4. Golf course maintenance activities between five-thirty a.m. and ending no later than eight p.m. on any given day.
F. Enforcement. The city manager or designee shall have the responsibility and authority to enforce the provisions of this section. (Ord. 565 § 1, 2017; Ord.
550 § 1, 2016)
View the mobile version.
102
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 5.1:
STUDY AREA PHOTOS
103
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
104
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L1_E
33, 37' 39.900000", 116, 15' 13.400000"
L1_N
33, 37' 39.830000", 116, 15' 13.430000"
L1_S
33, 37' 39.830000", 116, 15' 13.430000"
L1_W
33, 37' 39.900000", 116, 15' 13.400000"
L2_E
33, 37' 39.670000", 116, 15' 5.000000"
L2_N
33, 37' 39.670000", 116, 15' 5.030000"
105
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L2_S
33, 37' 39.680000", 116, 15' 5.030000"
L2_W
33, 37' 39.680000", 116, 15' 4.970000"
L3_E
33, 37' 40.370000", 116, 15' 1.730000"
L3_N
33, 37' 40.600000", 116, 15' 1.870000"
L3_S
33, 37' 40.600000", 116, 15' 1.870000"
L3_W
33, 37' 40.370000", 116, 15' 1.730000"
106
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L4_H
33, 37' 36.210000", 116, 15' 1.040000"
L4_N
33, 37' 35.640000", 116, 14' 59.700000"
L4_S
33, 37' 36.190000", 116, 15' 1.100000"
L4_W
33, 37' 36.220000", 116, 15' 1.040000"
L5_E
33, 37' 38.390000", 116, 15' 1.730000"
L5_N
33, 37' 37.150000", 116, 15' 1.700000"
107
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L5_S
33, 37' 38.460000", 116, 15' 1.700000"
L5_W
33, 37' 38.350000", 116, 15' 1.700000"
L6_E
33, 36' 56.080000", 116, 15' 2.250000"
L6_N
33, 36' 53.960000", 116, 14' 58.540000"
L6_S
,
L6_W
33, 36' 55.980000", 116, 15' 2.200000"
108
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L7_E
33, 36' 46.100000", 116, 15' 7.170000"
L7_N
,
L7_S
,
L7_W
33, 36' 45.940000", 116, 15' 7.060000"
L8_E
33, 36' 45.670000", 116, 15' 21.180000"
L8_N
33, 36' 53.960000", 116, 14' 58.540000"
109
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L8_S
33, 36' 45.670000", 116, 15' 21.180000"
L8_W
33, 36' 45.660000", 116, 15' 21.150000"
L9_E
33, 37' 28.040000", 116, 16' 13.330000"
L9_N
33, 38' 49.930000", 116, 16' 5.310000"
L9_S
33, 37' 28.020000", 116, 16' 13.330000"
L9_W
33, 37' 28.050000", 116, 16' 13.310000"
110
JN: 12642 Study Area Photos
L10_E
33, 37' 39.780000", 116, 15' 47.190000"
L10_N
33, 37' 39.760000", 116, 15' 47.190000"
L10_S
33, 37' 39.760000", 116, 15' 47.190000"
L10_W
33, 37' 39.820000", 116, 15' 47.210000"
111
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
112
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 5.2:
NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS
113
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
114
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 40.8 61.3 36.3 43.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.8 10.0 50.8
1 36.5 43.9 36.3 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.5 10.0 46.5
2 38.2 58.0 36.3 45.0 42.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 38.2 10.0 48.2
3 42.3 64.6 36.3 52.0 48.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.3 10.0 52.3
4 51.0 71.7 36.3 64.0 62.0 56.0 52.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.0 10.0 61.0
5 57.7 80.3 36.3 68.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 53.0 46.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 57.7 10.0 67.7
6 56.9 80.5 41.0 68.0 67.0 63.0 59.0 51.0 48.0 44.0 43.0 42.0 56.9 10.0 66.9
7 55.8 76.5 41.8 67.0 66.0 63.0 60.0 50.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 55.8 0.0 55.8
8 56.7 80.1 39.3 67.0 65.0 62.0 60.0 51.0 44.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 56.7 0.0 56.7
9 54.0 75.0 39.1 66.0 64.0 60.0 58.0 47.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 54.0 0.0 54.0
10 55.6 77.9 37.6 67.0 65.0 61.0 59.0 49.0 43.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 55.6 0.0 55.6
11 55.3 74.7 41.0 67.0 65.0 62.0 59.0 49.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 55.3 0.0 55.3
12 54.8 73.0 40.9 66.0 64.0 61.0 60.0 49.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 54.8 0.0 54.8
13 57.4 80.0 39.2 68.0 65.0 62.0 60.0 53.0 45.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 57.4 0.0 57.4
14 55.3 78.2 38.7 66.0 65.0 61.0 59.0 50.0 44.0 40.0 39.0 39.0 55.3 0.0 55.3
15 54.8 76.3 36.3 66.0 64.0 61.0 58.0 49.0 43.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 54.8 0.0 54.8
16 53.6 73.1 36.3 66.0 64.0 60.0 57.0 45.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 53.6 0.0 53.6
17 50.0 67.7 36.3 62.0 60.0 57.0 54.0 45.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 50.0 0.0 50.0
18 47.7 67.4 36.3 60.0 57.0 53.0 50.0 44.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 47.7 0.0 47.7
19 51.9 80.5 36.3 62.0 59.0 53.0 49.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 51.9 5.0 56.9
20 44.7 66.7 36.3 58.0 51.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.7 5.0 49.7
21 47.4 74.1 36.3 58.0 54.0 47.0 45.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 47.4 5.0 52.4
22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.3 10.0 52.3
23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 47.7 67.4 36.3 60.0 57.0 53.0 50.0 44.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 57.4 80.1 41.8 68.0 66.0 63.0 60.0 53.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0
54.9 65.7 63.7 60.3 57.8 48.4 42.9 39.4 39.0 38.6
Min 44.7 66.7 36.3 58.0 51.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 51.9 80.5 36.3 62.0 59.0 53.0 49.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0
49.0 59.3 54.7 48.3 45.7 42.3 39.7 37.0 37.0 36.3
Min 36.5 43.9 36.3 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 57.7 80.5 41.0 68.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 53.0 48.0 44.0 43.0 42.0
51.5 52.1 50.3 47.2 45.7 42.2 39.4 37.3 37.1 36.7
Evening
L1 - Located along 58th Ave. in front of entrance to Coral
Mountain and west of Salida del Sol.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
53.4 54.2 51.5
Energy Average Average:58.5Night
Energy Average Average:40.836.538.242.351.057.756.955.856.754.055.655.354.857.455.354.853.650.047.751.944.747.442.339.435.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L1_B 115
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 56.0 67.2 36.1 64.0 64.0 63.0 59.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 56.0 10.0 66.0
1 52.1 62.0 36.1 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 52.1 10.0 62.1
2 43.9 64.1 36.1 57.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.9 10.0 53.9
3 47.7 71.9 36.1 59.0 55.0 51.0 48.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 47.7 10.0 57.7
4 57.9 77.2 36.1 71.0 68.0 64.0 61.0 53.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 57.9 10.0 67.9
5 65.5 90.3 36.1 77.0 74.0 70.0 68.0 61.0 55.0 46.0 44.0 40.0 65.5 10.0 75.5
6 66.2 91.4 42.1 77.0 73.0 68.0 66.0 59.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 66.2 10.0 76.2
7 64.2 87.0 43.7 76.0 73.0 69.0 66.0 58.0 54.0 48.0 47.0 45.0 64.2 0.0 64.2
8 62.4 84.2 39.7 74.0 71.0 67.0 65.0 58.0 53.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 62.4 0.0 62.4
9 61.2 79.7 39.1 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 53.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 61.2 0.0 61.2
10 64.0 91.2 36.1 73.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 59.0 53.0 44.0 41.0 38.0 64.0 0.0 64.0
11 64.2 88.2 36.1 76.0 72.0 69.0 67.0 60.0 54.0 45.0 43.0 38.0 64.2 0.0 64.2
12 66.3 90.2 39.1 79.0 75.0 70.0 67.0 59.0 54.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 66.3 0.0 66.3
13 62.8 84.0 38.1 73.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 60.0 55.0 46.0 44.0 40.0 62.8 0.0 62.8
14 63.4 86.5 38.4 74.0 72.0 68.0 66.0 60.0 55.0 45.0 43.0 40.0 63.4 0.0 63.4
15 61.5 82.8 40.3 71.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 59.0 55.0 48.0 46.0 43.0 61.5 0.0 61.5
16 63.2 89.8 36.1 74.0 72.0 67.0 64.0 57.0 52.0 45.0 42.0 36.0 63.2 0.0 63.2
17 58.4 79.8 36.1 69.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 55.0 51.0 40.0 39.0 36.0 58.4 0.0 58.4
18 60.8 80.7 36.1 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 56.0 51.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 60.8 0.0 60.8
19 62.1 88.0 36.1 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 57.0 49.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 62.1 5.0 67.1
20 55.5 75.4 36.1 68.0 64.0 59.0 58.0 52.0 44.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 55.5 5.0 60.5
21 55.1 79.5 36.1 67.0 63.0 60.0 58.0 51.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 36.0 55.1 5.0 60.1
22 61.4 76.4 36.1 74.0 74.0 66.0 58.0 55.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 61.4 10.0 71.4
23 51.8 67.0 36.1 65.0 64.0 57.0 55.0 47.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.8 10.0 61.8
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 58.4 79.7 36.1 69.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 55.0 51.0 38.0 36.0 36.0
Max 66.3 91.2 43.7 79.0 75.0 70.0 67.0 60.0 55.0 48.0 47.0 45.0
63.1 73.6 71.2 67.5 65.3 58.3 53.3 44.7 42.7 39.6
Min 55.1 75.4 36.1 67.0 63.0 59.0 58.0 51.0 44.0 38.0 36.0 36.0
Max 62.1 88.0 36.1 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 57.0 49.0 39.0 38.0 36.0
58.8 68.3 65.0 61.7 60.0 53.3 46.0 38.7 36.7 36.0
Min 43.9 62.0 36.1 57.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 66.2 91.4 42.1 77.0 74.0 70.0 68.0 61.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 45.0
60.7 66.8 64.8 60.1 57.0 51.1 46.8 38.7 38.2 37.4
Energy Average Average:67.6Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
61.9 62.5 60.7
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L2 - Located along 58th Ave. South of home at 57925 Barristo
Cir.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 56.052.143.947.757.965.566.264.262.461.264.064.266.362.863.461.563.258.460.862.155.555.161.451.835.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L2_M 116
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 39.5 56.6 36.2 51.0 49.0 44.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.5 10.0 49.5
1 35.9 50.2 36.2 42.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.9 10.0 45.9
2 42.0 63.3 36.2 54.0 52.0 46.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 10.0 52.0
3 48.8 74.1 36.2 60.0 57.0 53.0 50.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 48.8 10.0 58.8
4 54.6 72.6 36.2 67.0 63.0 60.0 58.0 52.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 54.6 10.0 64.6
5 59.4 79.5 36.2 69.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 58.0 55.0 46.0 43.0 37.0 59.4 10.0 69.4
6 62.9 85.3 46.0 73.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 61.0 57.0 50.0 49.0 47.0 62.9 10.0 72.9
7 63.8 89.4 44.5 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 60.0 56.0 50.0 49.0 46.0 63.8 0.0 63.8
8 60.3 82.8 39.2 69.0 67.0 64.0 63.0 59.0 55.0 47.0 45.0 42.0 60.3 0.0 60.3
9 61.4 80.5 39.2 71.0 69.0 67.0 65.0 61.0 57.0 47.0 44.0 41.0 61.4 0.0 61.4
10 63.9 90.7 36.2 72.0 70.0 67.0 64.0 60.0 56.0 47.0 43.0 36.0 63.9 0.0 63.9
11 63.1 84.5 36.2 74.0 71.0 67.0 65.0 60.0 56.0 48.0 46.0 39.0 63.1 0.0 63.1
12 60.1 79.9 39.1 70.0 67.0 64.0 63.0 59.0 55.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 60.1 0.0 60.1
13 63.1 85.5 40.0 74.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 47.0 45.0 41.0 63.1 0.0 63.1
14 62.9 83.7 40.0 75.0 71.0 68.0 65.0 60.0 56.0 49.0 46.0 42.0 62.9 0.0 62.9
15 62.9 84.1 40.2 75.0 71.0 66.0 64.0 59.0 56.0 49.0 47.0 43.0 62.9 0.0 62.9
16 62.7 89.1 36.2 71.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 58.0 55.0 47.0 44.0 39.0 62.7 0.0 62.7
17 57.6 78.0 36.2 67.0 65.0 62.0 60.0 56.0 53.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 57.6 0.0 57.6
18 55.9 73.8 36.2 66.0 64.0 61.0 59.0 55.0 51.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 55.9 0.0 55.9
19 56.1 83.6 36.2 63.0 61.0 58.0 56.0 52.0 46.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 56.1 5.0 61.1
20 53.6 76.4 36.2 66.0 64.0 58.0 56.0 50.0 43.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 53.6 5.0 58.6
21 53.1 79.2 36.2 61.0 58.0 55.0 53.0 47.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 53.1 5.0 58.1
22 46.5 68.0 36.2 58.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 46.5 10.0 56.5
23 42.7 59.1 36.2 55.0 53.0 49.0 45.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.7 10.0 52.7
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 55.9 73.8 36.2 66.0 64.0 61.0 59.0 55.0 51.0 39.0 36.0 36.0
Max 63.9 90.7 44.5 75.0 71.0 68.0 65.0 61.0 57.0 50.0 49.0 46.0
62.0 71.3 68.6 65.3 63.3 58.9 55.1 46.5 44.0 40.2
Min 53.1 76.4 36.2 61.0 58.0 55.0 53.0 47.0 42.0 37.0 36.0 36.0
Max 56.1 83.6 36.2 66.0 64.0 58.0 56.0 52.0 46.0 39.0 36.0 36.0
54.5 63.3 61.0 57.0 55.0 49.7 43.7 37.7 36.0 36.0
Min 35.9 50.2 36.2 42.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 62.9 85.3 46.0 73.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 61.0 57.0 50.0 49.0 47.0
55.6 58.8 56.4 52.7 49.9 44.1 41.4 38.7 38.2 37.3
Energy Average Average:63.6Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
59.9 61.2 55.6
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L3 - Located northeast of Madison St. and 58th Ave. adjacent
to wall enclosing golf course.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 39.535.942.048.854.659.462.963.860.361.463.963.160.163.162.962.962.757.655.956.153.653.146.542.735.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L3_L 117
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 46.5 59.1 35.0 52.0 50.0 48.0 47.0 46.0 46.0 44.0 39.0 36.0 46.5 10.0 56.5
1 45.2 50.8 36.4 48.0 47.0 47.0 46.0 45.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 38.0 45.2 10.0 55.2
2 44.1 60.7 35.0 54.0 52.0 48.0 46.0 44.0 39.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 44.1 10.0 54.1
3 46.2 65.0 35.0 59.0 56.0 51.0 49.0 41.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.2 10.0 56.2
4 53.5 69.7 35.4 65.0 62.0 60.0 58.0 51.0 45.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 53.5 10.0 63.5
5 56.9 77.2 41.8 66.0 64.0 61.0 60.0 56.0 53.0 46.0 45.0 42.0 56.9 10.0 66.9
6 59.8 81.8 45.7 66.0 65.0 63.0 62.0 59.0 56.0 51.0 50.0 48.0 59.8 10.0 69.8
7 58.0 77.8 46.8 66.0 63.0 61.0 60.0 57.0 54.0 50.0 49.0 48.0 58.0 0.0 58.0
8 54.5 66.0 40.8 62.0 61.0 59.0 58.0 55.0 51.0 46.0 45.0 42.0 54.5 0.0 54.5
9 54.1 67.7 39.8 63.0 61.0 59.0 58.0 54.0 51.0 43.0 42.0 40.0 54.1 0.0 54.1
10 53.0 70.4 37.4 62.0 60.0 58.0 57.0 53.0 49.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 53.0 0.0 53.0
11 54.4 77.2 37.9 63.0 61.0 58.0 57.0 53.0 49.0 42.0 41.0 38.0 54.4 0.0 54.4
12 51.8 69.4 38.0 61.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 51.0 47.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 51.8 0.0 51.8
13 51.7 70.1 38.0 61.0 59.0 56.0 55.0 52.0 47.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 51.7 0.0 51.7
14 52.5 72.3 38.0 62.0 60.0 57.0 55.0 52.0 48.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 52.5 0.0 52.5
15 52.5 67.8 39.7 61.0 59.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 49.0 43.0 42.0 40.0 52.5 0.0 52.5
16 56.6 82.2 37.3 66.0 62.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 41.0 39.0 38.0 56.6 0.0 56.6
17 55.5 77.8 37.9 68.0 62.0 59.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 41.0 39.0 38.0 55.5 0.0 55.5
18 56.3 76.2 38.0 66.0 63.0 60.0 58.0 54.0 51.0 43.0 40.0 38.0 56.3 0.0 56.3
19 55.6 77.7 37.9 62.0 61.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 39.0 55.6 5.0 60.6
20 53.7 66.3 43.3 60.0 59.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 53.7 5.0 58.7
21 51.2 69.9 37.7 60.0 58.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 51.2 5.0 56.2
22 48.2 62.9 35.0 59.0 59.0 57.0 52.0 42.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 48.2 10.0 58.2
23 42.8 59.4 35.0 55.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 42.8 10.0 52.8
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 51.7 66.0 37.3 61.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 51.0 47.0 41.0 39.0 38.0
Max 58.0 82.2 46.8 68.0 63.0 61.0 60.0 57.0 54.0 50.0 49.0 48.0
54.7 63.4 60.8 58.2 56.9 53.5 49.5 42.9 41.5 39.7
Min 51.2 66.3 37.7 60.0 58.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 38.0
Max 55.6 77.7 43.3 62.0 61.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0
53.9 60.7 59.3 56.7 55.7 53.0 50.0 46.7 46.3 42.0
Min 42.8 50.8 35.0 48.0 47.0 47.0 45.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 59.8 81.8 45.7 66.0 65.0 63.0 62.0 59.0 56.0 51.0 50.0 48.0
53.2 58.2 56.3 53.6 51.7 47.0 44.1 40.2 39.2 37.9
Evening
L4 - Located on the southeast corner of 58th Ave. and
Madison St.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
54.1 54.5 53.2
Energy Average Average:60.1Night
Energy Average Average:46.545.244.146.253.556.959.858.054.554.153.054.451.851.752.552.556.655.556.355.653.751.248.242.835.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L4_H 118
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 37.6 42.8 35.7 39.0 39.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.6 10.0 47.6
1 40.2 63.6 35.7 45.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 40.2 10.0 50.2
2 37.2 44.5 35.7 39.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.2 10.0 47.2
3 43.9 72.7 35.7 46.0 40.0 38.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 43.9 10.0 53.9
4 55.3 78.7 35.7 68.0 66.0 60.0 54.0 43.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 55.3 10.0 65.3
5 62.8 81.3 35.7 74.0 73.0 70.0 68.0 57.0 49.0 40.0 38.0 37.0 62.8 10.0 72.8
6 61.1 81.4 40.3 74.0 72.0 67.0 63.0 51.0 47.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 61.1 10.0 71.1
7 65.6 81.6 38.6 77.0 76.0 73.0 71.0 58.0 47.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 65.6 0.0 65.6
8 62.8 81.6 40.0 75.0 73.0 69.0 66.0 55.0 50.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 62.8 0.0 62.8
9 58.9 77.5 38.7 71.0 69.0 65.0 62.0 56.0 50.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 58.9 0.0 58.9
10 61.2 80.8 35.7 73.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 51.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 61.2 0.0 61.2
11 60.9 84.5 35.7 73.0 72.0 68.0 65.0 50.0 42.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 60.9 0.0 60.9
12 62.0 86.0 35.7 74.0 71.0 66.0 63.0 48.0 42.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 62.0 0.0 62.0
13 60.4 82.4 35.7 72.0 70.0 66.0 64.0 53.0 44.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 60.4 0.0 60.4
14 59.4 78.0 35.7 72.0 70.0 67.0 64.0 48.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 59.4 0.0 59.4
15 59.1 78.9 35.7 71.0 69.0 66.0 63.0 48.0 41.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 59.1 0.0 59.1
16 56.7 78.8 35.7 70.0 68.0 62.0 56.0 42.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 56.7 0.0 56.7
17 50.2 71.6 35.7 65.0 60.0 51.0 47.0 40.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 50.2 0.0 50.2
18 46.7 69.9 35.7 56.0 52.0 50.0 48.0 41.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.7 0.0 46.7
19 51.1 77.7 35.7 62.0 56.0 48.0 46.0 42.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 51.1 5.0 56.1
20 39.5 49.2 35.7 44.0 44.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 39.5 5.0 44.5
21 50.1 74.6 35.7 64.0 59.0 49.0 45.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 50.1 5.0 55.1
22 48.7 74.0 35.7 56.0 50.0 49.0 48.0 46.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 48.7 10.0 58.7
23 44.0 48.8 35.7 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 44.0 44.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 44.0 10.0 54.0
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 46.7 69.9 35.7 56.0 52.0 50.0 47.0 40.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 65.6 86.0 40.0 77.0 76.0 73.0 71.0 58.0 50.0 44.0 43.0 41.0
60.6 70.8 68.4 64.3 61.3 49.2 42.4 37.3 36.6 36.2
Min 39.5 49.2 35.7 44.0 44.0 42.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 51.1 77.7 35.7 64.0 59.0 49.0 46.0 42.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
49.0 56.7 53.0 46.3 44.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Min 37.2 42.8 35.7 39.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 62.8 81.4 40.3 74.0 73.0 70.0 68.0 57.0 49.0 42.0 41.0 40.0
56.1 54.0 51.4 49.3 47.8 43.3 40.1 36.3 36.0 35.8
Evening
L5 - Located south of 58th Ave. outside the northwest corner
of the Analusia Country Club.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
58.7 59.7 56.1
Energy Average Average:63.3Night
Energy Average Average:37.640.237.243.955.362.861.165.662.858.961.260.962.060.459.459.156.750.246.751.139.550.148.744.035.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L5_I 119
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 41.4 63.8 34.8 49.0 43.0 41.0 40.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 41.4 10.0 51.4
1 45.9 66.9 34.8 58.0 56.0 53.0 48.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 45.9 10.0 55.9
2 46.4 69.8 34.8 60.0 53.0 45.0 44.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.4 10.0 56.4
3 49.8 73.5 35.6 64.0 58.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 49.8 10.0 59.8
4 54.8 75.1 37.6 67.0 65.0 61.0 58.0 46.0 41.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 54.8 10.0 64.8
5 60.0 76.9 37.8 70.0 69.0 67.0 65.0 58.0 50.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 60.0 10.0 70.0
6 62.5 85.9 43.1 71.0 70.0 68.0 66.0 61.0 55.0 49.0 48.0 44.0 62.5 10.0 72.5
7 59.8 75.9 44.3 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 59.0 53.0 48.0 47.0 46.0 59.8 0.0 59.8
8 59.0 72.8 44.1 68.0 67.0 65.0 64.0 59.0 53.0 47.0 46.0 45.0 59.0 0.0 59.0
9 58.9 73.4 39.5 68.0 67.0 65.0 63.0 59.0 53.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 58.9 0.0 58.9
10 57.9 73.9 39.4 67.0 66.0 64.0 63.0 58.0 50.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 57.9 0.0 57.9
11 58.2 78.8 37.8 67.0 66.0 64.0 63.0 58.0 50.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 58.2 0.0 58.2
12 58.3 73.6 37.8 68.0 66.0 64.0 63.0 58.0 51.0 42.0 40.0 37.0 58.3 0.0 58.3
13 58.3 73.4 40.7 67.0 66.0 64.0 63.0 59.0 51.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 58.3 0.0 58.3
14 59.6 73.0 39.6 68.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 60.0 52.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 59.6 0.0 59.6
15 60.1 74.5 37.8 69.0 68.0 66.0 65.0 61.0 51.0 40.0 39.0 38.0 60.1 0.0 60.1
16 59.6 75.9 34.8 69.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 60.0 51.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 59.6 0.0 59.6
17 59.5 74.4 34.8 69.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 58.0 49.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 59.5 0.0 59.5
18 60.7 80.2 37.7 71.0 69.0 67.0 66.0 56.0 47.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 60.7 0.0 60.7
19 56.2 71.7 34.8 67.0 66.0 64.0 62.0 53.0 44.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 56.2 5.0 61.2
20 54.5 71.3 34.8 67.0 66.0 62.0 58.0 46.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 54.5 5.0 59.5
21 54.6 75.6 34.8 68.0 66.0 59.0 54.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 54.6 5.0 59.6
22 51.5 75.0 34.8 66.0 62.0 51.0 46.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 51.5 10.0 61.5
23 46.4 71.9 34.8 57.0 49.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.4 10.0 56.4
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 57.9 72.8 34.8 67.0 66.0 64.0 63.0 56.0 47.0 39.0 37.0 35.0
Max 60.7 80.2 44.3 71.0 69.0 67.0 66.0 61.0 53.0 48.0 47.0 46.0
59.2 68.4 67.2 65.3 64.1 58.8 50.9 42.2 40.8 39.4
Min 54.5 71.3 34.8 67.0 66.0 59.0 54.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 56.2 75.6 34.8 68.0 66.0 64.0 62.0 53.0 44.0 37.0 37.0 35.0
55.2 67.3 66.0 61.7 58.0 46.0 40.0 36.3 35.7 35.0
Min 41.4 63.8 34.8 49.0 43.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Max 62.5 85.9 43.1 71.0 70.0 68.0 66.0 61.0 55.0 49.0 48.0 44.0
55.8 62.4 58.3 52.9 50.0 43.6 40.4 37.7 37.4 36.8
Energy Average Average:63.0Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
57.8 58.7 55.8
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L6 - Located along Cll Conchita southeast of home at 80900
Cll Conchita.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 41.445.946.449.854.860.062.559.859.058.957.958.258.358.359.660.159.659.560.756.254.554.651.546.435.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L6_N 120
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 56.2 58.8 52.3 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 56.2 10.0 66.2
1 55.5 57.9 52.1 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 53.0 52.0 52.0 55.5 10.0 65.5
2 54.9 57.4 51.7 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 54.9 10.0 64.9
3 55.4 63.8 52.9 57.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 55.4 10.0 65.4
4 56.0 59.9 52.7 58.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 56.0 10.0 66.0
5 55.9 67.8 52.7 60.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 55.9 10.0 65.9
6 57.5 78.4 53.3 64.0 62.0 59.0 58.0 57.0 56.0 54.0 54.0 53.0 57.5 10.0 67.5
7 60.6 86.4 52.9 66.0 64.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 60.6 0.0 60.6
8 60.2 74.4 53.2 64.0 63.0 62.0 62.0 61.0 59.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 60.2 0.0 60.2
9 58.6 75.6 52.0 65.0 63.0 62.0 62.0 60.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 58.6 0.0 58.6
10 54.5 64.2 52.3 57.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 54.5 0.0 54.5
11 54.0 69.0 50.6 62.0 58.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 0.0 54.0
12 56.0 74.1 50.8 62.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 56.0 0.0 56.0
13 58.2 65.8 54.1 64.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 58.0 56.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 58.2 0.0 58.2
14 61.3 85.9 51.9 67.0 64.0 63.0 62.0 59.0 57.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 61.3 0.0 61.3
15 54.2 68.1 51.3 60.0 59.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 52.0 51.0 54.2 0.0 54.2
16 58.3 84.6 52.5 65.0 61.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 58.3 0.0 58.3
17 57.8 68.2 54.0 61.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 57.8 0.0 57.8
18 57.4 71.6 53.6 62.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 57.4 0.0 57.4
19 56.1 63.0 52.7 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 54.0 54.0 53.0 56.1 5.0 61.1
20 55.5 60.9 52.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 52.0 55.5 5.0 60.5
21 57.0 65.6 53.1 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 57.0 5.0 62.0
22 56.7 58.8 53.8 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 54.0 56.7 10.0 66.7
23 56.1 58.5 52.2 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 56.1 10.0 66.1
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 54.0 64.2 50.6 57.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 51.0
Max 61.3 86.4 54.1 67.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 61.0 59.0 56.0 55.0 54.0
58.2 62.9 60.9 59.3 58.8 56.9 55.5 53.6 53.3 52.4
Min 55.5 60.9 52.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 52.0
Max 57.0 65.6 53.1 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 53.0
56.2 57.7 57.3 57.3 57.3 56.3 56.0 54.0 54.0 52.7
Min 54.9 57.4 51.7 57.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 52.0
Max 57.5 78.4 53.8 64.0 62.0 59.0 58.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 54.0
56.1 58.4 57.9 57.1 56.9 56.1 55.3 53.7 53.1 52.7
Energy Average Average:63.1Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
57.3 57.9 56.1
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L7 - Located along 60th Ave. north of gated entrace to single
family homes.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 56.255.554.955.456.055.957.560.660.258.654.554.056.058.261.354.258.357.857.456.155.557.056.756.135.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L7_T 121
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 34.9 39.4 36.4 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 34.9 10.0 44.9
1 35.0 41.1 36.4 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 10.0 45.0
2 35.3 42.3 36.4 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.3 10.0 45.3
3 35.6 45.7 36.4 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.6 10.0 45.6
4 37.4 47.3 36.4 44.0 43.0 41.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.4 10.0 47.4
5 42.7 56.1 36.4 53.0 50.0 47.0 45.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.7 10.0 52.7
6 46.4 67.4 39.3 56.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 46.4 10.0 56.4
7 48.9 70.0 39.3 58.0 57.0 53.0 51.0 47.0 44.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 48.9 0.0 48.9
8 46.0 58.3 40.0 54.0 53.0 50.0 49.0 46.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 46.0 0.0 46.0
9 41.7 60.4 36.4 48.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 41.7 0.0 41.7
10 45.9 66.5 36.4 58.0 53.0 50.0 49.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 45.9 0.0 45.9
11 40.0 60.1 36.4 49.0 46.0 43.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 0.0 40.0
12 45.5 67.4 36.4 57.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 45.5 0.0 45.5
13 40.9 55.2 36.4 49.0 48.0 44.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.9 0.0 40.9
14 46.7 68.0 36.4 58.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 43.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 46.7 0.0 46.7
15 42.1 56.9 36.4 51.0 49.0 47.0 45.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.1 0.0 42.1
16 44.5 71.7 36.4 53.0 49.0 45.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.5 0.0 44.5
17 40.5 54.5 36.4 50.0 48.0 46.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.5 0.0 40.5
18 39.2 52.2 36.4 48.0 47.0 44.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.2 0.0 39.2
19 40.5 60.9 36.4 53.0 47.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.5 5.0 45.5
20 38.6 58.4 36.4 50.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 38.6 5.0 43.6
21 36.4 55.8 36.4 42.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.4 5.0 41.4
22 35.4 46.4 36.4 42.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.4 10.0 45.4
23 35.0 42.5 36.4 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 10.0 45.0
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 39.2 52.2 36.4 48.0 46.0 43.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 48.9 71.7 40.0 58.0 57.0 53.0 51.0 47.0 44.0 41.0 41.0 41.0
44.5 52.8 50.3 47.0 45.2 41.5 39.1 37.1 36.8 36.8
Min 36.4 55.8 36.4 42.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 40.5 60.9 36.4 53.0 47.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
38.8 48.3 44.0 39.7 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Min 34.9 39.4 36.4 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 46.4 67.4 39.3 56.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 39.0
39.9 42.8 40.8 39.3 38.8 37.7 37.1 36.6 36.6 36.3
Energy Average Average:47.3Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
42.7 43.8 39.9
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L8 - Located towards the western end of 60th Ave. south of
home at 80800 60th Ave.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 35.035.335.637.442.746.448.946.041.745.940.045.540.946.742.144.540.539.240.538.636.435.435.035.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L8_S 122
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 35.2 45.0 36.3 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.2 10.0 45.2
1 39.1 63.0 36.3 50.0 44.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.1 10.0 49.1
2 36.2 45.8 36.3 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.2 10.0 46.2
3 36.6 55.3 36.3 39.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.6 10.0 46.6
4 40.8 62.7 36.3 52.0 49.0 44.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.8 10.0 50.8
5 54.4 83.7 36.3 61.0 59.0 55.0 52.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 54.4 10.0 64.4
6 55.8 82.8 41.1 66.0 62.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 55.8 10.0 65.8
7 55.9 78.6 41.1 68.0 62.0 57.0 55.0 49.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 55.9 0.0 55.9
8 51.8 72.8 39.2 63.0 60.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 45.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 51.8 0.0 51.8
9 51.1 69.8 36.3 63.0 61.0 56.0 53.0 47.0 44.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 51.1 0.0 51.1
10 49.6 72.2 36.3 62.0 59.0 54.0 51.0 44.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 49.6 0.0 49.6
11 51.4 71.9 36.3 64.0 60.0 56.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.4 0.0 51.4
12 54.4 79.8 36.3 66.0 62.0 56.0 53.0 45.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 54.4 0.0 54.4
13 56.6 84.2 36.3 68.0 64.0 57.0 54.0 47.0 42.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 56.6 0.0 56.6
14 51.3 74.6 36.3 64.0 60.0 55.0 52.0 44.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.3 0.0 51.3
15 53.4 78.0 36.3 66.0 62.0 57.0 54.0 47.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 53.4 0.0 53.4
16 49.0 74.5 36.3 60.0 56.0 52.0 49.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 49.0 0.0 49.0
17 44.2 69.2 36.3 56.0 52.0 47.0 44.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.2 0.0 44.2
18 43.2 69.5 36.3 53.0 50.0 45.0 42.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.2 0.0 43.2
19 50.4 79.7 36.3 59.0 56.0 49.0 46.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 50.4 5.0 55.4
20 37.2 51.0 36.3 46.0 42.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.2 5.0 42.2
21 38.9 60.1 36.3 50.0 46.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 38.9 5.0 43.9
22 40.3 63.2 36.3 51.0 47.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.3 10.0 50.3
23 35.5 48.5 36.3 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.5 10.0 45.5
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 43.2 69.2 36.3 53.0 50.0 45.0 42.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 56.6 84.2 41.1 68.0 64.0 57.0 55.0 49.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0
52.5 62.8 59.0 54.1 51.3 44.5 40.8 37.5 37.2 36.8
Min 37.2 51.0 36.3 46.0 42.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 50.4 79.7 36.3 59.0 56.0 49.0 46.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
46.1 51.7 48.0 42.7 40.3 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Min 35.2 45.0 36.3 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 55.8 83.7 41.1 66.0 62.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0
48.9 48.8 45.9 42.4 40.7 38.2 37.4 36.8 36.7 36.7
Evening
L9 - Located along Jefferson St. north of Quarry Ln.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
50.9 51.7 48.9
Energy Average Average:56.0Night
Energy Average Average:35.239.136.236.640.854.455.855.951.851.149.651.454.456.651.353.449.044.243.250.437.238.940.335.535.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L9_G 123
Date:Location:Meter:Piccolo I JN:12642
Project:1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Analyst:P. Mara
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%L eq Adj.Adj. L eq
0 56.0 67.2 36.1 64.0 64.0 63.0 59.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 56.0 10.0 66.0
1 52.1 62.0 36.1 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 52.1 10.0 62.1
2 43.9 64.1 36.1 57.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.9 10.0 53.9
3 47.7 71.9 36.1 59.0 55.0 51.0 48.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 47.7 10.0 57.7
4 57.9 77.2 36.1 71.0 68.0 64.0 61.0 53.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 57.9 10.0 67.9
5 57.7 80.3 36.3 68.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 53.0 46.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 57.7 10.0 67.7
6 57.1 74.2 37.3 68.0 67.0 64.0 62.0 54.0 47.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 57.1 10.0 67.1
7 64.2 87.0 43.7 76.0 73.0 69.0 66.0 58.0 54.0 48.0 47.0 45.0 64.2 0.0 64.2
8 62.4 84.2 39.7 74.0 71.0 67.0 65.0 58.0 53.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 62.4 0.0 62.4
9 61.2 79.7 39.1 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 59.0 53.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 61.2 0.0 61.2
10 64.0 91.2 36.1 73.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 59.0 53.0 44.0 41.0 38.0 64.0 0.0 64.0
11 64.2 88.2 36.1 76.0 72.0 69.0 67.0 60.0 54.0 45.0 43.0 38.0 64.2 0.0 64.2
12 61.0 83.8 36.1 72.0 70.0 66.0 64.0 58.0 53.0 46.0 43.0 40.0 61.0 0.0 61.0
13 62.8 84.0 38.1 73.0 71.0 68.0 66.0 60.0 55.0 46.0 44.0 40.0 62.8 0.0 62.8
14 63.4 86.5 38.4 74.0 72.0 68.0 66.0 60.0 55.0 45.0 43.0 40.0 63.4 0.0 63.4
15 61.5 82.8 40.3 71.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 59.0 55.0 48.0 46.0 43.0 61.5 0.0 61.5
16 63.2 89.8 36.1 74.0 72.0 67.0 64.0 57.0 52.0 45.0 42.0 36.0 63.2 0.0 63.2
17 58.4 79.8 36.1 69.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 55.0 51.0 40.0 39.0 36.0 58.4 0.0 58.4
18 60.8 80.7 36.1 72.0 70.0 67.0 65.0 56.0 51.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 60.8 0.0 60.8
19 62.1 88.0 36.1 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 57.0 49.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 62.1 5.0 67.1
20 44.7 66.7 36.3 58.0 51.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.7 5.0 49.7
21 47.4 74.1 36.3 58.0 54.0 47.0 45.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 47.4 5.0 52.4
22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.3 10.0 52.3
23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4
Timeframe Hour L eq L max L min L1%L2%L5%L8%L25%L50%L90%L95%L99%
Min 58.4 79.7 36.1 69.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 55.0 51.0 38.0 36.0 36.0
Max 64.2 91.2 43.7 76.0 73.0 69.0 67.0 60.0 55.0 48.0 47.0 45.0
62.5 73.0 70.8 67.2 65.1 58.3 53.3 44.7 42.6 39.5
Min 44.7 66.7 36.1 58.0 51.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 62.1 88.0 36.3 70.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 57.0 49.0 39.0 36.0 36.0
57.5 62.0 57.7 52.7 50.7 47.0 42.3 37.0 36.0 36.0
Min 39.4 45.9 36.1 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0
Max 57.9 80.3 37.3 71.0 68.0 64.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 41.0 39.0 39.0
54.2 59.3 57.4 54.4 52.4 47.2 42.8 37.0 36.7 36.3
Energy Average Average:63.3Night
Energy Average Average:
Evening 24-Hour CNEL (dBA)
60.3 61.9 54.2
Night
L eq (dBA)
Day
Energy Average Average:
24-Hour Daytime Nighttime
Evening
L10 - Located along 58th Ave slighty east of 58th Ave. and
Stone Creek Way.
24-Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted)
Night
Day 56.052.143.947.757.957.757.164.262.461.264.064.261.062.863.461.563.258.460.862.144.747.442.339.435.040.045.050.055.060.065.070.075.080.085.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Hourly Leq(dBA)Hour Beginning
\\Uxr-fs\ucdata\UcJobs\_12600-13000\_12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642_L10_F 124
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 7.1:
OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS
125
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
126
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
22,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,120 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.44
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.80 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.75 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.5 68.9 67.1 61.1 70.369.7
63.9
63.9
62.7 56.3 54.8 63.563.2
62.8 53.8 55.0 63.563.4
Vehicle Noise:72.1 70.6 67.7 62.8 71.871.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
79 169 786365
85 182 846393
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
16,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,507 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -18.28 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -22.24 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.0 67.4 65.6 59.6 68.868.2
62.4
62.4
61.2 54.8 53.3 62.061.8
61.3 52.3 53.5 62.061.9
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.1 66.2 61.3 70.369.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
63 135 626291
67 145 674313
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
12,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,181 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.10
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -19.34 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -23.29 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.4 64.6 58.5 67.867.2
61.3
61.4
60.2 53.8 52.2 60.960.7
60.3 51.2 52.5 61.060.8
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.1 65.1 60.2 69.368.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 115 532247
57 123 573266
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
5,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:549 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.25 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.21 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.2 62.6 60.8 54.8 64.063.4
57.8
58.2
56.6 50.2 48.7 57.357.1
57.1 48.0 49.3 57.857.6
Vehicle Noise:65.9 64.4 61.4 56.6 65.665.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 55 257119
28 59 276128
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
127
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
6,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:642 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.3 61.5 55.4 64.764.1
58.4
58.9
57.2 50.9 49.3 58.057.8
57.7 48.7 50.0 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.6 65.1 62.1 57.3 66.365.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 61 285132
31 66 306142
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
4,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:419 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.43 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.39 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.0 61.4 59.6 53.6 62.862.2
56.6
57.0
55.4 49.0 47.5 56.255.9
55.9 46.9 48.1 56.656.5
Vehicle Noise:64.7 63.3 60.2 55.4 64.464.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 46 21499
23 50 230107
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
9,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:874 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.99
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.23 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.19 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.6 62.8 56.8 66.065.4
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.2 50.7 59.459.1
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.4 58.6 67.667.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 350162
38 81 376175
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
6,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:623 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.70 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.66 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.7 63.1 61.4 55.3 64.563.9
58.3
58.7
57.1 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
57.6 48.6 49.8 58.358.2
Vehicle Noise:66.4 65.0 61.9 57.2 66.265.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 60 279130
30 65 300139
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
128
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
2,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:260 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.79
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -25.03 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -28.99 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.9 58.3 56.5 50.5 59.759.1
53.7
54.5
52.5 46.1 44.6 53.353.0
53.4 44.4 45.6 54.154.0
Vehicle Noise:61.7 60.3 57.2 52.5 61.561.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
13 28 12960
14 30 13864
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
9,600
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:893 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.90
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.14 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.10 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.8 63.2 61.4 55.4 64.664.0
58.3
58.8
57.1 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
57.6 48.6 49.9 58.358.2
Vehicle Noise:66.5 65.0 62.0 57.2 66.265.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 72 333154
36 77 358166
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
7,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:698 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.21 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.17 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.7 62.1 60.3 54.3 63.562.9
57.3
57.7
56.1 49.7 48.2 56.956.6
56.6 47.5 48.8 57.357.1
Vehicle Noise:65.4 63.9 60.9 56.1 65.164.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 61 282131
30 65 303141
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
5,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:474 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.65
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.89 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.84 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.5 62.0 60.2 54.1 63.462.8
57.1
57.5
55.9 49.6 48.0 56.756.5
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:65.2 63.8 60.8 56.0 65.064.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 50 233108
25 54 250116
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
129
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
3,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:363 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.81
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.05 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.01 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.4 60.8 59.0 53.0 62.261.6
56.0
56.4
54.8 48.4 46.9 55.555.3
55.3 46.2 47.5 56.055.8
Vehicle Noise:64.1 62.6 59.6 54.8 63.863.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 42 19590
21 45 20997
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
3,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:316 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.65 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.60 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.8 60.2 58.4 52.4 61.661.0
55.4
55.8
54.2 47.8 46.3 55.054.7
54.7 45.6 46.9 55.455.2
Vehicle Noise:63.5 62.0 59.0 54.2 63.262.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 38 17882
19 41 19189
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
2,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:251 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.65 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.60 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.8 59.2 57.4 51.4 60.660.0
54.4
54.8
53.2 46.8 45.3 54.053.7
53.7 44.6 45.9 54.454.2
Vehicle Noise:62.5 61.0 58.0 53.2 62.261.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
15 33 15271
16 35 16476
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:Existing (2019)
12,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,200 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.62
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.6 66.0 64.2 58.2 67.466.8
61.2
61.6
60.0 53.6 52.1 60.760.5
60.5 51.4 52.7 61.261.0
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.8 64.8 60.0 69.068.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 93 432201
46 100 464216
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
130
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:Existing (2019)
11,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,042 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.47 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.43 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.6 57.5 66.866.2
60.5
61.0
59.3 53.0 51.4 60.159.9
59.9 50.8 52.1 60.560.4
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.2 64.2 59.4 68.467.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 85 393183
42 91 423196
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:Existing (2019)
9,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:865 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.28 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.23 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.6 63.0 61.3 55.2 64.463.8
58.2
58.6
57.0 50.6 49.1 57.857.6
57.5 48.5 49.7 58.258.1
Vehicle Noise:66.3 64.9 61.8 57.1 66.165.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 70 326151
35 75 350162
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:Existing (2019)
7,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:735 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.75
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.99 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.94 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.9 62.1 56.0 65.364.7
59.0
59.4
57.8 51.5 49.9 58.658.4
58.3 49.3 50.5 59.058.9
Vehicle Noise:67.1 65.7 62.7 57.9 66.966.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 67 312145
33 72 335155
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:Existing (2019)
8,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:800 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.38
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.8 64.2 62.5 56.4 65.665.0
59.4
59.8
58.2 51.8 50.3 59.058.8
58.7 49.7 50.9 59.459.3
Vehicle Noise:67.5 66.1 63.0 58.2 67.366.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 71 330153
35 76 354165
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
131
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:Existing (2019)
5,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:493 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.48
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.72 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.68 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.7 62.1 60.4 54.3 63.562.9
57.3
57.7
56.1 49.7 48.2 56.956.6
56.6 47.6 48.8 57.357.2
Vehicle Noise:65.4 64.0 60.9 56.1 65.264.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 51 239111
26 55 257119
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:Existing (2019)
2,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:186 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.71
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -26.95 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -30.91 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.5 57.9 56.1 50.1 59.358.7
53.1
53.5
51.9 45.5 44.0 52.652.4
52.4 43.3 44.6 53.152.9
Vehicle Noise:61.2 59.7 56.7 51.9 60.960.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
12 27 12558
13 29 13462
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Existing (2019)
1,600
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:149 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-10.22
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -27.46 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -31.42 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.5 55.9 54.1 48.1 57.356.7
51.2
52.1
50.1 43.7 42.1 50.850.6
51.0 41.9 43.2 51.751.6
Vehicle Noise:59.3 57.9 54.7 50.1 59.158.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
9 19 8941
10 20 9544
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Existing (2019)
2,300
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:214 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.65
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -25.89 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -29.84 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.0 57.5 55.7 49.6 58.958.3
52.8
53.7
51.6 45.3 43.7 52.452.2
52.6 43.5 44.8 53.353.1
Vehicle Noise:60.9 59.5 56.3 51.6 60.660.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
11 24 11352
12 26 12156
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
132
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Existing (2019)
1,800
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:167 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-10.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -27.41 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -31.37 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.2 56.5 55.2 49.2 58.257.6
51.8
52.2
48.2 40.7 49.5 55.755.6
48.5 45.1 49.7 56.055.9
Vehicle Noise:59.9 57.7 55.7 54.2 61.661.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
15 33 15472
16 35 16275
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Existing (2019)
1,400
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:130 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-11.26
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -28.50 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -32.46 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.1 55.4 54.1 48.1 57.156.5
50.7
51.1
47.1 39.6 48.4 54.654.5
47.4 44.0 48.6 54.954.8
Vehicle Noise:58.8 56.6 54.7 53.1 60.560.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
13 28 13060
14 29 13764
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:Existing (2019)
100
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:9 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-21.75
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -38.99 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -42.95 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
45.1 43.5 41.8 35.7 45.044.4
39.1
40.5
37.9 31.6 30.0 38.738.5
39.4 30.3 31.6 40.039.9
Vehicle Noise:47.2 45.7 42.5 37.9 46.946.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
1 2 115
1 2 125
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:Existing (2019)
3,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:298 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -24.45 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -28.41 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.5 58.9 57.1 51.1 60.359.7
54.3
55.1
53.1 46.7 45.2 53.953.6
54.0 45.0 46.2 54.754.6
Vehicle Noise:62.3 60.9 57.7 53.1 62.161.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
14 30 14165
15 33 15170
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
133
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:E+P
23,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,167 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.70 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.66 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.6 69.0 67.2 61.2 70.469.8
64.0
64.0
62.8 56.4 54.9 63.663.3
62.9 53.9 55.1 63.663.5
Vehicle Noise:72.2 70.7 67.8 62.9 71.971.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
80 172 798370
86 185 858398
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:E+P
16,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,572 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -18.10 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -22.05 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.2 67.6 65.8 59.8 69.068.4
62.6
62.6
61.4 55.0 53.5 62.261.9
61.5 52.5 53.7 62.262.1
Vehicle Noise:70.8 69.3 66.4 61.5 70.570.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
64 139 644299
69 149 693322
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:E+P
13,600
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,265 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -19.04 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -23.00 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.2 66.7 64.9 58.8 68.167.5
61.6
61.7
60.4 54.1 52.5 61.261.0
60.6 51.5 52.8 61.361.1
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.4 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
56 120 557259
60 129 599278
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
6,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:595 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.66
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.5 62.9 61.2 55.1 64.363.7
58.1
58.5
56.9 50.6 49.0 57.757.5
57.4 48.4 49.6 58.158.0
Vehicle Noise:66.2 64.8 61.7 57.0 66.065.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 58 271126
29 63 291135
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
134
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
7,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:716 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.3 63.7 62.0 55.9 65.164.5
58.9
59.3
57.7 51.4 49.8 58.558.3
58.2 49.2 50.4 58.958.8
Vehicle Noise:67.0 65.6 62.5 57.8 66.866.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 66 306142
33 71 329153
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
5,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:539 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.33 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.28 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.1 62.5 60.7 54.7 63.963.3
57.7
58.1
56.5 50.1 48.6 57.357.0
57.0 48.0 49.2 57.757.6
Vehicle Noise:65.8 64.4 61.3 56.5 65.565.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 55 254118
27 59 273127
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
11,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,107 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.21 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.16 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.2 65.6 63.9 57.8 67.066.4
60.8
61.2
59.6 53.2 51.7 60.460.2
60.1 51.1 52.3 60.860.7
Vehicle Noise:68.9 67.5 64.4 59.7 68.768.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 88 410190
44 95 440204
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
9,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:902 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.7 63.0 56.9 66.265.5
59.9
60.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
59.2 50.2 51.4 59.959.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.5 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 77 357166
38 83 384178
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
135
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:E+P
3,900
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:363 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.36
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -23.59 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -27.55 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.3 59.8 58.0 51.9 61.260.6
55.1
56.0
53.9 47.6 46.0 54.754.5
54.9 45.8 47.1 55.655.4
Vehicle Noise:63.2 61.8 58.6 53.9 62.962.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
16 35 16175
17 37 17280
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
10,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:939 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.68
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.92 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.87 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.0 63.4 61.6 55.6 64.864.2
58.6
59.0
57.4 51.0 49.5 58.157.9
57.9 48.8 50.1 58.658.4
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.2 62.2 57.4 66.466.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 74 344160
37 80 370172
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
8,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:763 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.82 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.78 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.1 62.5 60.7 54.7 63.963.3
57.6
58.1
56.5 50.1 48.5 57.257.0
57.0 47.9 49.2 57.757.5
Vehicle Noise:65.8 64.3 61.3 56.5 65.565.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
30 65 300139
32 69 322149
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
5,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:549 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.25 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.21 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.2 62.6 60.8 54.8 64.063.4
57.8
58.2
56.6 50.2 48.7 57.357.1
57.1 48.0 49.3 57.857.6
Vehicle Noise:65.9 64.4 61.4 56.6 65.665.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 55 257119
28 59 276128
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
136
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
4,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:428 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.10
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.33 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.29 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 61.5 59.7 53.7 62.962.3
56.7
57.1
55.5 49.1 47.6 56.356.0
56.0 46.9 48.2 56.756.6
Vehicle Noise:64.8 63.4 60.3 55.5 64.564.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
22 47 217101
23 50 234108
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
4,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:409 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.29
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.53 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.48 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.9 61.3 59.5 53.5 62.762.1
56.5
56.9
55.3 48.9 47.4 56.155.8
55.8 46.8 48.0 56.556.4
Vehicle Noise:64.6 63.2 60.1 55.3 64.363.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 21198
23 49 227105
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:E+P
2,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:270 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.10
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.34 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.29 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.1 59.5 57.7 51.7 60.960.3
54.7
55.1
53.5 47.1 45.6 54.354.0
54.0 44.9 46.2 54.754.6
Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.3 58.3 53.5 62.562.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
16 34 16074
17 37 17280
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:E+P
13,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,246 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.45
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.69 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.65 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.7 66.1 64.4 58.3 67.667.0
61.3
61.7
60.1 53.8 52.2 60.960.7
60.6 51.6 52.8 61.361.2
Vehicle Noise:69.4 68.0 64.9 60.2 69.268.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
44 96 443206
48 103 476221
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
137
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:E+P
11,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,060 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.15
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.39 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.35 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.7 57.6 66.966.2
60.6
61.0
59.4 53.1 51.5 60.260.0
59.9 50.9 52.1 60.660.5
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.3 64.2 59.5 68.568.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 86 398185
43 92 428199
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:E+P
9,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:884 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.18 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.14 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.7 63.1 61.4 55.3 64.563.9
58.3
58.7
57.1 50.7 49.2 57.957.6
57.6 48.6 49.8 58.358.2
Vehicle Noise:66.4 65.0 61.9 57.1 66.265.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 71 330153
36 76 355165
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:E+P
8,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:772 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.53
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.2 65.564.9
59.2
59.7
58.0 51.7 50.1 58.858.6
58.5 49.5 50.8 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 65.9 62.9 58.1 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
32 69 322150
35 75 346161
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:E+P
9,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:884 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.7 62.9 56.8 66.165.5
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.3 50.7 59.459.2
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.5 58.7 67.767.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 76 353164
38 82 379176
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
138
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:E+P
5,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:521 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.24
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.48 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.44 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.9 62.4 60.6 54.5 63.863.2
57.5
57.9
56.3 50.0 48.4 57.156.9
56.8 47.8 49.1 57.557.4
Vehicle Noise:65.6 64.2 61.2 56.4 65.464.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 53 248115
27 57 266124
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:E+P
2,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:214 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.11
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -26.34 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -30.30 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.1 58.5 56.7 50.7 59.959.3
53.7
54.1
52.5 46.1 44.6 53.353.0
53.0 43.9 45.2 53.753.5
Vehicle Noise:61.8 60.3 57.3 52.5 61.561.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
14 30 13764
15 32 14768
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:E+P
2,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:205 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.84
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -26.08 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -30.04 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.9 57.3 55.5 49.4 58.758.1
52.6
53.5
51.4 45.1 43.5 52.252.0
52.4 43.3 44.6 53.152.9
Vehicle Noise:60.7 59.3 56.1 51.4 60.460.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
11 24 11051
12 25 11855
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:E+P
4,100
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:381 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.14
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -23.38 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -27.33 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.6 60.0 58.2 52.2 61.460.8
55.3
56.2
54.1 47.8 46.2 54.954.7
55.1 46.0 47.3 55.855.6
Vehicle Noise:63.4 62.0 58.8 54.1 63.162.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
17 36 16677
18 38 17883
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
139
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:E+P
2,700
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:251 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.65 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.60 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.0 58.3 57.0 51.0 60.059.4
53.6
54.0
50.0 42.5 51.2 57.457.4
50.2 46.8 51.5 57.857.7
Vehicle Noise:61.7 59.4 57.5 56.0 63.363.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 20294
21 46 21298
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:E+P
2,000
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:186 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.71
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -26.95 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -30.91 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.7 57.0 55.7 49.7 58.758.1
52.2
52.7
48.7 41.2 49.9 56.156.1
48.9 45.5 50.2 56.556.4
Vehicle Noise:60.4 58.1 56.2 54.7 62.061.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
17 36 16577
17 37 17481
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:E+P
1,300
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:121 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-10.62
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -27.85 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -31.81 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.3 54.7 52.9 46.9 56.155.5
50.3
51.6
49.1 42.7 41.2 49.949.6
50.5 41.5 42.7 51.251.1
Vehicle Noise:58.3 56.9 53.6 49.1 58.057.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
6 13 5928
6 14 6430
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:E+P
4,500
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:419 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.73
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.97 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.93 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.0 60.4 58.6 52.6 61.861.2
55.7
56.6
54.5 48.2 46.6 55.355.1
55.5 46.4 47.7 56.256.0
Vehicle Noise:63.8 62.4 59.2 54.5 63.563.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 38 17782
19 41 18988
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
140
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EA
28,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,623 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.36
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.87 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.83 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.4 69.8 68.1 62.0 71.270.6
64.8
64.8
63.6 57.3 55.7 64.464.2
63.7 54.7 55.9 64.464.3
Vehicle Noise:73.0 71.5 68.6 63.7 72.772.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
91 195 906421
97 210 975452
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EA
19,400
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,804 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.26
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.50 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.45 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.8 68.2 66.4 60.4 69.669.0
63.2
63.2
62.0 55.6 54.1 62.862.5
62.1 53.1 54.3 62.862.7
Vehicle Noise:71.4 69.9 67.0 62.1 71.170.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
71 152 706328
76 164 760353
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EA
16,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,516 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -18.25 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -22.21 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.0 67.4 65.7 59.6 68.868.2
62.4
62.5
61.2 54.9 53.3 62.061.8
61.4 52.3 53.6 62.161.9
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.2 61.3 70.469.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
63 135 629292
68 146 676314
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
9,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:837 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.18
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.42 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.38 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.4 62.7 56.6 65.865.2
59.6
60.0
58.4 52.0 50.5 59.258.9
58.9 49.9 51.1 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.3 63.2 58.4 67.567.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 73 340158
37 79 365170
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
141
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
11,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,051 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.6 57.6 66.866.2
60.6
61.0
59.4 53.0 51.5 60.259.9
59.9 50.9 52.1 60.660.5
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.3 64.2 59.4 68.468.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 85 396184
43 92 425197
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
7,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:698 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.21 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.17 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 63.6 61.9 55.8 65.064.4
58.8
59.2
57.6 51.2 49.7 58.458.2
58.1 49.1 50.3 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:66.9 65.5 62.4 57.6 66.766.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
30 65 301140
32 70 324150
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
15,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,414 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.91
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.14 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.10 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.7 64.9 58.9 68.167.5
61.9
62.3
60.7 54.3 52.8 61.561.2
61.2 52.1 53.4 61.961.7
Vehicle Noise:70.0 68.5 65.5 60.7 69.769.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
48 104 482224
52 112 518240
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
10,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:995 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.67 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.62 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.8 65.2 63.4 57.4 66.666.0
60.3
60.8
59.1 52.8 51.2 59.959.7
59.7 50.6 51.9 60.360.2
Vehicle Noise:68.5 67.0 64.0 59.2 68.267.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 82 382177
41 88 410190
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
142
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EA
5,100
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:474 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.5 60.9 59.2 53.1 62.361.7
56.3
57.1
55.1 48.7 47.2 55.955.6
56.0 47.0 48.2 56.756.6
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.9 59.8 55.1 64.163.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 19289
21 44 20696
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
10,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:949 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.64
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.88 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.83 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.0 63.4 61.7 55.6 64.864.2
58.6
59.0
57.4 51.0 49.5 58.258.0
57.9 48.9 50.1 58.658.5
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.3 62.2 57.5 66.566.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 347161
37 80 372173
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
9,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:902 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.09 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.05 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.8 63.2 61.5 55.4 64.664.0
58.4
58.8
57.2 50.8 49.3 58.057.7
57.7 48.7 49.9 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.5 65.1 62.0 57.2 66.365.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 72 335156
36 78 360167
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
8,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:828 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.47 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.42 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.4 62.6 56.6 65.865.2
59.5
60.0
58.3 52.0 50.4 59.158.9
58.9 49.8 51.1 59.559.4
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.2 63.2 58.4 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 73 338157
36 78 363168
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
143
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
7,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:707 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.92
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.15 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.11 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.3 63.7 61.9 55.9 65.164.5
58.9
59.3
57.7 51.3 49.8 58.458.2
58.2 49.1 50.4 58.958.7
Vehicle Noise:67.0 65.5 62.5 57.7 66.766.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
30 65 304141
33 70 326152
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
6,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:567 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.87
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.11 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.06 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.3 62.7 61.0 54.9 64.163.5
57.9
58.3
56.7 50.3 48.8 57.557.3
57.2 48.2 49.4 57.957.8
Vehicle Noise:66.0 64.6 61.5 56.8 65.865.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 57 262122
28 61 282131
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EA
5,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:484 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.80 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.76 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.6 62.0 60.3 54.2 63.462.8
57.2
57.6
56.0 49.7 48.1 56.856.6
56.5 47.5 48.7 57.257.1
Vehicle Noise:65.3 63.9 60.8 56.1 65.164.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 51 236110
25 55 253118
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EA
13,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,209 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.58
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.82 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.78 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.6 66.0 64.3 58.2 67.466.8
61.2
61.6
60.0 53.6 52.1 60.860.5
60.5 51.5 52.7 61.261.1
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.9 64.8 60.0 69.168.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 94 435202
47 101 467217
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
144
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EA
14,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,358 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.5 64.8 58.7 67.967.3
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.1 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 101 470218
50 109 504234
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EA
11,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,107 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.3 65.564.9
59.3
59.7
58.1 51.7 50.2 58.958.6
58.6 49.5 50.8 59.359.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 66.0 62.9 58.1 67.166.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 83 384178
41 89 413192
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EA
11,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,042 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.47 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.43 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.6 57.5 66.866.2
60.5
61.0
59.3 53.0 51.4 60.159.9
59.9 50.8 52.1 60.560.4
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.2 64.2 59.4 68.467.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 85 393183
42 91 423196
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EA
12,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,190 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.65
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.89 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.85 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 66.0 64.2 58.1 67.466.8
61.1
61.5
59.9 53.6 52.0 60.760.5
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.8 64.7 60.0 69.068.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 93 430200
46 100 462214
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
145
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EA
7,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:716 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.3 63.7 62.0 55.9 65.164.5
58.9
59.3
57.7 51.4 49.8 58.558.3
58.2 49.2 50.4 58.958.8
Vehicle Noise:67.0 65.6 62.5 57.8 66.866.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 66 306142
33 71 329153
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EA
4,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:372 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.70
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.94 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.90 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.5 60.9 59.1 53.1 62.361.7
56.1
56.5
54.9 48.5 47.0 55.755.4
55.4 46.3 47.6 56.155.9
Vehicle Noise:64.2 62.7 59.7 54.9 63.963.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 19892
21 46 21399
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EA
2,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:260 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.79
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -25.03 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -28.99 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.9 58.3 56.5 50.5 59.759.1
53.7
54.5
52.5 46.1 44.6 53.353.0
53.4 44.4 45.6 54.154.0
Vehicle Noise:61.7 60.3 57.2 52.5 61.561.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
13 28 12960
14 30 13864
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EA
3,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:353 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.47
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -23.71 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -27.66 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.2 59.6 57.9 51.8 61.060.4
55.0
55.8
53.8 47.4 45.9 54.654.4
54.7 45.7 47.0 55.455.3
Vehicle Noise:63.1 61.6 58.5 53.8 62.862.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
16 34 15873
17 36 16979
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
146
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EA
3,800
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:353 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.16 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.12 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.5 59.8 58.5 52.4 61.560.9
55.0
55.5
51.5 44.0 52.7 58.958.9
51.7 48.3 53.0 59.359.2
Vehicle Noise:63.2 60.9 59.0 57.5 64.864.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 55 254118
27 57 266124
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EA
2,600
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:242 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.57
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.81 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.77 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.8 58.1 56.8 50.8 59.859.2
53.4
53.8
49.8 42.3 51.1 57.357.2
50.1 46.7 51.3 57.657.5
Vehicle Noise:61.5 59.3 57.3 55.8 63.262.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 42 19791
21 45 20796
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EA
600
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:56 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-13.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -31.21 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -35.17 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
52.9 51.3 49.6 43.5 52.752.1
46.9
48.2
45.7 39.4 37.8 46.546.3
47.1 38.1 39.3 47.847.7
Vehicle Noise:54.9 53.5 50.2 45.7 54.754.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
4 8 3616
4 8 3818
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EA
6,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:558 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.48
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.72 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.68 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.2 61.6 59.9 53.8 63.062.4
57.0
57.8
55.8 49.4 47.9 56.656.3
56.7 47.7 48.9 57.457.3
Vehicle Noise:65.1 63.6 60.5 55.8 64.864.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 46 21499
23 49 229107
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
147
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAP
28,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,669 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.44
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.80 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.75 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.5 69.9 68.1 62.1 71.370.7
64.9
64.9
63.7 57.3 55.8 64.564.2
63.8 54.8 56.0 64.564.4
Vehicle Noise:73.1 71.6 68.7 63.8 72.872.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
92 197 917425
99 212 986458
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAP
20,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,869 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.11
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.34 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.30 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.9 68.3 66.6 60.5 69.869.2
63.3
63.4
62.1 55.8 54.2 62.962.7
62.3 53.2 54.5 63.062.8
Vehicle Noise:71.5 70.1 67.1 62.2 71.370.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 156 723336
78 168 778361
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAP
17,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,600 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.78
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -18.02 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.98 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.3 67.7 65.9 59.9 69.168.5
62.7
62.7
61.5 55.1 53.6 62.362.0
61.6 52.6 53.8 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.8 69.4 66.4 61.6 70.670.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
65 140 652302
70 151 701325
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
9,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:884 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.7 62.9 56.8 66.165.5
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.3 50.7 59.459.2
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.5 58.7 67.767.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 76 353164
38 82 379176
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
148
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
12,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,125 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.90
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.13 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.09 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.3 65.7 63.9 57.9 67.166.5
60.9
61.3
59.7 53.3 51.8 60.560.2
60.2 51.1 52.4 60.960.8
Vehicle Noise:69.0 67.6 64.5 59.7 68.768.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 414192
45 96 445207
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
8,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:818 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.28
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.52 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.47 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.9 64.3 62.6 56.5 65.765.1
59.5
59.9
58.3 51.9 50.4 59.158.9
58.8 49.8 51.0 59.559.4
Vehicle Noise:67.6 66.2 63.1 58.3 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 72 335156
36 78 360167
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
17,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,646 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.24
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.4 65.6 59.5 68.868.2
62.5
62.9
61.3 55.0 53.4 62.161.9
61.8 52.8 54.1 62.562.4
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.2 61.4 70.469.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 115 534248
57 124 573266
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
13,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,274 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.36
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.59 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.55 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.2 64.5 58.4 67.767.0
61.4
61.8
60.2 53.9 52.3 61.060.8
60.7 51.7 52.9 61.461.3
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.1 65.0 60.3 69.368.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 97 450209
48 104 483224
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
149
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAP
6,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:577 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.58 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.54 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.4 61.8 60.0 53.9 63.262.6
57.1
58.0
55.9 49.6 48.0 56.756.5
56.9 47.8 49.1 57.657.4
Vehicle Noise:65.2 63.8 60.6 55.9 64.964.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
22 47 219101
23 51 235109
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
10,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:995 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.67 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.62 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 63.6 61.9 55.8 65.164.4
58.8
59.2
57.6 51.3 49.7 58.458.2
58.1 49.1 50.3 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:66.9 65.5 62.4 57.7 66.766.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 77 358166
38 83 384178
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
10,400
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:967 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.79 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.75 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.1 63.5 61.8 55.7 64.964.3
58.7
59.1
57.5 51.1 49.6 58.358.0
58.0 49.0 50.2 58.758.6
Vehicle Noise:66.8 65.4 62.3 57.5 66.666.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 76 351163
38 81 377175
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
9,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:902 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.7 63.0 56.9 66.265.5
59.9
60.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
59.2 50.2 51.4 59.959.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.5 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 77 357166
38 83 384178
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
150
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
8,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:772 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.53
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.2 65.564.9
59.2
59.7
58.0 51.7 50.1 58.858.6
58.5 49.5 50.8 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 65.9 62.9 58.1 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
32 69 322150
35 75 346161
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
7,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:660 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.45 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.41 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.0 63.4 61.6 55.6 64.864.2
58.6
59.0
57.4 51.0 49.5 58.257.9
57.9 48.8 50.1 58.658.4
Vehicle Noise:66.7 65.2 62.2 57.4 66.466.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
29 63 290135
31 67 312145
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAP
5,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:502 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.40
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.64 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.59 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.8 62.2 60.4 54.4 63.663.0
57.4
57.8
56.2 49.8 48.3 57.056.7
56.7 47.6 48.9 57.457.3
Vehicle Noise:65.5 64.0 61.0 56.2 65.264.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 52 242112
26 56 260121
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAP
13,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,256 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.42
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.66 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.61 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.2 64.4 58.4 67.667.0
61.3
61.8
60.2 53.8 52.2 60.960.7
60.7 51.6 52.9 61.461.2
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.0 65.0 60.2 69.268.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 96 446207
48 103 479222
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
151
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAP
14,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,376 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.26 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.22 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.2 66.6 64.8 58.8 68.067.4
61.7
62.2
60.6 54.2 52.6 61.361.1
61.1 52.0 53.3 61.861.6
Vehicle Noise:69.9 68.4 65.4 60.6 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 102 474220
51 110 509236
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAP
12,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,125 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.90
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.13 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.09 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.8 64.2 62.4 56.4 65.665.0
59.3
59.8
58.1 51.8 50.2 58.958.7
58.7 49.6 50.9 59.359.2
Vehicle Noise:67.5 66.0 63.0 58.2 67.266.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 84 388180
42 90 417194
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EAP
11,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,079 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.1 65.5 63.8 57.7 66.966.3
60.7
61.1
59.5 53.1 51.6 60.360.1
60.0 51.0 52.2 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:68.8 67.4 64.3 59.5 68.668.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 87 403187
43 93 433201
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAP
13,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,274 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.36
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.59 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.55 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.2 64.5 58.4 67.767.0
61.4
61.8
60.2 53.9 52.3 61.060.8
60.7 51.7 52.9 61.461.3
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.1 65.0 60.3 69.368.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 97 450209
48 104 483224
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
152
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAP
8,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:744 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.69
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.93 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.89 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.5 63.9 62.1 56.1 65.364.7
59.1
59.5
57.9 51.5 50.0 58.758.4
58.4 49.4 50.6 59.159.0
Vehicle Noise:67.2 65.8 62.7 57.9 66.966.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 68 314146
34 73 338157
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EAP
4,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:400 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.39
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.63 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.58 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.8 61.2 59.4 53.4 62.662.0
56.4
56.8
55.2 48.8 47.3 56.055.7
55.7 46.7 47.9 56.456.3
Vehicle Noise:64.5 63.1 60.0 55.2 64.263.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20896
22 48 223104
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAP
3,400
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:316 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -24.19 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -28.15 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.7 59.2 57.4 51.3 60.660.0
54.5
55.4
53.3 47.0 45.4 54.153.9
54.3 45.2 46.5 55.054.8
Vehicle Noise:62.6 61.2 58.0 53.3 62.361.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
15 32 14668
16 34 15773
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAP
5,600
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:521 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.78
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.02 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.98 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.9 61.3 59.6 53.5 62.762.1
56.7
57.5
55.5 49.1 47.6 56.356.0
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:64.8 63.3 60.2 55.5 64.564.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 44 20495
22 47 219102
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
153
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAP
4,700
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:437 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.00
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.24 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.20 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.4 60.7 59.4 53.4 62.461.8
56.0
56.4
52.4 44.9 53.6 59.859.8
52.7 49.3 53.9 60.260.1
Vehicle Noise:64.1 61.8 59.9 58.4 65.765.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
29 63 292136
31 66 307142
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAP
3,200
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:298 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.67
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.91 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.87 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.7 59.0 57.7 51.7 60.760.1
54.3
54.7
50.7 43.2 52.0 58.258.1
51.0 47.6 52.2 58.558.4
Vehicle Noise:62.4 60.2 58.2 56.7 64.163.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 49 226105
24 51 237110
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAP
1,800
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:167 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.20
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -26.44 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -30.40 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.7 56.1 54.3 48.3 57.556.9
51.7
53.0
50.5 44.1 42.6 51.351.1
51.9 42.9 44.1 52.652.5
Vehicle Noise:59.7 58.3 55.0 50.5 59.459.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
7 16 7434
8 17 7937
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAP
7,300
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:679 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.63
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -20.87 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -24.83 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.1 62.5 60.7 54.7 63.963.3
57.8
58.7
56.6 50.3 48.7 57.457.2
57.6 48.5 49.8 58.358.1
Vehicle Noise:65.9 64.5 61.3 56.6 65.665.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 53 244113
26 56 262121
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
154
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC21
32,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,976 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.91
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.32 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.28 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.0 70.4 68.6 62.5 71.871.2
65.4
65.4
64.2 57.8 56.3 65.064.7
64.3 55.2 56.5 65.064.9
Vehicle Noise:73.5 72.1 69.1 64.3 73.372.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
99 212 986458
106 228 1,060492
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC21
22,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,130 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.78 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.73 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.5 68.9 67.1 61.1 70.369.7
63.9
63.9
62.7 56.3 54.8 63.563.3
62.8 53.8 55.0 63.563.4
Vehicle Noise:72.1 70.6 67.7 62.8 71.871.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
79 170 789366
85 183 848394
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC21
18,400
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,711 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.73 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.68 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.5 68.0 66.2 60.1 69.468.8
63.0
63.0
61.8 55.4 53.9 62.562.3
61.9 52.8 54.1 62.662.5
Vehicle Noise:71.1 69.7 66.7 61.9 70.970.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
68 147 682316
73 158 733340
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
8,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:763 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.82 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.78 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.6 64.0 62.2 56.2 65.464.8
59.2
59.6
58.0 51.6 50.1 58.858.5
58.5 49.5 50.7 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.3 65.9 62.8 58.0 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
32 69 320148
34 74 343159
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
155
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
9,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:874 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.99
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.23 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.19 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.6 62.8 56.8 66.065.4
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.2 50.7 59.459.1
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.4 58.6 67.667.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 350162
38 81 376175
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
7,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:698 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.21 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.17 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 63.6 61.9 55.8 65.064.4
58.8
59.2
57.6 51.2 49.7 58.458.2
58.1 49.1 50.3 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:66.9 65.5 62.4 57.6 66.766.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
30 65 301140
32 70 324150
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
13,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,283 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.32
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.56 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.52 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.3 64.5 58.5 67.767.1
61.4
61.9
60.3 53.9 52.3 61.060.8
60.8 51.7 53.0 61.561.3
Vehicle Noise:69.6 68.1 65.1 60.3 69.368.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 97 452210
49 105 486225
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
11,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,051 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.6 57.6 66.866.2
60.6
61.0
59.4 53.0 51.5 60.259.9
59.9 50.9 52.1 60.660.5
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.3 64.2 59.4 68.468.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 85 396184
43 92 425197
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
156
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC21
4,700
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:437 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.78 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.74 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.1 60.6 58.8 52.7 62.061.4
55.9
56.8
54.7 48.4 46.8 55.555.3
55.7 46.6 47.9 56.456.2
Vehicle Noise:64.0 62.6 59.4 54.7 63.763.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 39 18284
19 42 19591
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
12,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,190 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.65
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.89 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.85 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.4 62.7 56.6 65.865.2
59.6
60.0
58.4 52.0 50.5 59.258.9
58.9 49.9 51.1 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.3 63.2 58.4 67.567.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 87 403187
43 93 433201
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
10,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:995 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.67 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.62 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 63.6 61.9 55.8 65.164.4
58.8
59.2
57.6 51.3 49.7 58.458.2
58.1 49.1 50.3 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:66.9 65.5 62.4 57.7 66.766.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 77 358166
38 83 384178
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
8,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:791 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.67 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.62 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.8 64.2 62.4 56.4 65.665.0
59.3
59.8
58.1 51.8 50.2 58.958.7
58.7 49.6 50.9 59.359.2
Vehicle Noise:67.5 66.0 63.0 58.2 67.266.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 71 327152
35 76 352163
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
157
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
6,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:632 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.40
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.64 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.59 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.8 63.2 61.4 55.4 64.664.0
58.4
58.8
57.2 50.8 49.3 58.057.7
57.7 48.6 49.9 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.5 65.1 62.0 57.2 66.265.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 61 282131
30 65 303141
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
6,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:623 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.70 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.66 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.7 63.1 61.4 55.3 64.563.9
58.3
58.7
57.1 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
57.6 48.6 49.8 58.358.2
Vehicle Noise:66.4 65.0 61.9 57.2 66.265.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 60 279130
30 65 300139
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC21
6,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:595 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.66
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.5 62.9 61.2 55.1 64.363.7
58.1
58.5
56.9 50.6 49.0 57.757.5
57.4 48.4 49.6 58.158.0
Vehicle Noise:66.2 64.8 61.7 57.0 66.065.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 58 271126
29 63 291135
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC21
16,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,553 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.50
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.73 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.69 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.7 67.1 65.3 59.3 68.567.9
62.3
62.7
61.1 54.7 53.2 61.961.6
61.6 52.5 53.8 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.4 69.0 65.9 61.1 70.169.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
51 111 514238
55 119 552256
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
158
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC21
14,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,358 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.5 64.8 58.7 67.967.3
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.1 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 101 470218
50 109 504234
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC21
11,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,032 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.27
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.51 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.46 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.0
59.4
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.3
58.3 49.2 50.5 59.058.8
Vehicle Noise:67.1 65.7 62.6 57.8 66.866.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
37 79 367170
39 85 394183
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EAC21
11,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,070 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.12
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.36 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.31 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.1 65.5 63.7 57.7 66.966.3
60.7
61.1
59.5 53.1 51.6 60.260.0
60.0 50.9 52.2 60.760.5
Vehicle Noise:68.8 67.3 64.3 59.5 68.568.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 86 400186
43 93 430200
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC21
10,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,014 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.35
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.59 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.54 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.8 65.3 63.5 57.4 66.766.1
60.4
60.8
59.2 52.9 51.3 60.059.8
59.7 50.7 51.9 60.460.3
Vehicle Noise:68.5 67.1 64.1 59.3 68.367.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 83 386179
42 89 415193
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
159
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC21
6,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:605 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.83 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.79 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.6 63.0 61.2 55.2 64.463.8
58.2
58.6
57.0 50.6 49.1 57.857.5
57.5 48.5 49.7 58.258.1
Vehicle Noise:66.3 64.9 61.8 57.0 66.065.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 59 274127
29 63 294137
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EAC21
2,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:270 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.10
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.34 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.29 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.1 59.5 57.7 51.7 60.960.3
54.7
55.1
53.5 47.1 45.6 54.354.0
54.0 44.9 46.2 54.754.6
Vehicle Noise:62.8 61.3 58.3 53.5 62.562.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
16 34 16074
17 37 17280
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC21
4,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:446 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.45
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.69 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.65 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.2 60.7 58.9 52.8 62.161.5
56.0
56.9
54.8 48.5 46.9 55.655.4
55.8 46.7 48.0 56.556.3
Vehicle Noise:64.1 62.7 59.5 54.8 63.863.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 40 18486
20 43 19892
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC21
4,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:446 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.45
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.69 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.65 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.2 60.7 58.9 52.8 62.161.5
56.0
56.9
54.8 48.5 46.9 55.655.4
55.8 46.7 48.0 56.556.3
Vehicle Noise:64.1 62.7 59.5 54.8 63.863.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 40 18486
20 43 19892
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
160
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC21
2,700
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:251 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.65 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.60 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.0 58.3 57.0 51.0 60.059.4
53.6
54.0
50.0 42.5 51.2 57.457.4
50.2 46.8 51.5 57.857.7
Vehicle Noise:61.7 59.4 57.5 56.0 63.363.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 20294
21 46 21298
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC21
2,100
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:195 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.50
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -26.74 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -30.70 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.9 57.2 55.9 49.9 58.958.3
52.5
52.9
48.9 41.4 50.1 56.356.3
49.2 45.8 50.4 56.756.6
Vehicle Noise:60.6 58.3 56.4 54.9 62.261.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
17 37 17179
18 39 17983
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC21
700
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:65 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-13.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -30.54 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -34.50 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
53.6 52.0 50.2 44.2 53.452.8
47.6
48.9
46.4 40.0 38.5 47.247.0
47.8 38.8 40.0 48.548.4
Vehicle Noise:55.6 54.2 50.9 46.4 55.354.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
4 8 3918
4 9 4220
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC21
4,700
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:437 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.78 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.74 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.1 60.6 58.8 52.7 62.061.4
55.9
56.8
54.7 48.4 46.8 55.555.3
55.7 46.6 47.9 56.456.2
Vehicle Noise:64.0 62.6 59.4 54.7 63.763.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 39 18284
19 42 19591
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
161
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP21
32,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,985 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.31 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.27 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.0 70.4 68.6 62.6 71.871.2
65.4
65.4
64.2 57.8 56.3 65.064.7
64.3 55.3 56.5 65.064.9
Vehicle Noise:73.5 72.1 69.1 64.3 73.372.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
99 213 988458
106 229 1,063493
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP21
23,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,139 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.48
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.76 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.71 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.5 68.9 67.2 61.1 70.369.7
63.9
64.0
62.7 56.4 54.8 63.563.3
62.9 53.8 55.1 63.563.4
Vehicle Noise:72.1 70.7 67.7 62.8 71.971.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
79 170 791367
85 183 851395
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP21
18,600
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,730 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.44
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.68 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.64 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.6 68.0 66.2 60.2 69.468.8
63.0
63.0
61.8 55.4 53.9 62.662.4
61.9 52.9 54.1 62.662.5
Vehicle Noise:71.2 69.7 66.8 61.9 70.970.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
69 148 687319
74 159 739343
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
8,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:772 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.53
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.2 65.564.9
59.2
59.7
58.0 51.7 50.1 58.858.6
58.5 49.5 50.8 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 65.9 62.9 58.1 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
32 69 322150
35 75 346161
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
162
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
9,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:884 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.7 62.9 56.8 66.165.5
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.3 50.7 59.459.2
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.5 58.7 67.767.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 76 353164
38 82 379176
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
7,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:725 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.04 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.00 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.0
59.4
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.3
58.3 49.2 50.5 59.058.8
Vehicle Noise:67.1 65.6 62.6 57.8 66.866.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 67 309143
33 72 332154
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
14,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,339 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.14
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.38 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.33 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.0 66.5 64.7 58.6 67.967.3
61.6
62.0
60.4 54.1 52.5 61.261.0
60.9 51.9 53.2 61.661.5
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.3 65.3 60.5 69.569.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 100 465216
50 108 500232
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
12,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,125 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.90
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.13 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.09 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.3 65.7 63.9 57.9 67.166.5
60.9
61.3
59.7 53.3 51.8 60.560.2
60.2 51.1 52.4 60.960.8
Vehicle Noise:69.0 67.6 64.5 59.7 68.768.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 414192
45 96 445207
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
163
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP21
5,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:465 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.28
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.51 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.47 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.4 60.8 59.1 53.0 62.261.6
56.2
57.0
55.0 48.6 47.1 55.855.6
55.9 46.9 48.1 56.656.5
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.8 59.7 55.0 64.063.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 18988
20 44 20394
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
12,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,200 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.62
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.86 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.81 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.5 62.7 56.6 65.965.3
59.6
60.0
58.4 52.1 50.5 59.259.0
58.9 49.9 51.1 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.3 63.3 58.5 67.567.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 87 405188
44 94 435202
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
10,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,004 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.39
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.63 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.58 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.3 63.7 61.9 55.9 65.164.5
58.8
59.3
57.7 51.3 49.7 58.458.2
58.2 49.1 50.4 58.958.7
Vehicle Noise:67.0 65.5 62.5 57.7 66.766.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 78 360167
39 83 387180
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
8,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:800 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.38
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.8 64.2 62.5 56.4 65.665.0
59.4
59.8
58.2 51.8 50.3 59.058.8
58.7 49.7 50.9 59.459.3
Vehicle Noise:67.5 66.1 63.0 58.2 67.366.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 71 330153
35 76 354165
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
164
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
6,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:642 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.3 61.5 55.4 64.764.1
58.4
58.9
57.2 50.9 49.3 58.057.8
57.7 48.7 50.0 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.6 65.1 62.1 57.3 66.365.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 61 285132
31 66 306142
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
6,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:642 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.9 63.3 61.5 55.4 64.764.1
58.4
58.9
57.2 50.9 49.3 58.057.8
57.7 48.7 50.0 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.6 65.1 62.1 57.3 66.365.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 61 285132
31 66 306142
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP21
6,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:595 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.66
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.5 62.9 61.2 55.1 64.363.7
58.1
58.5
56.9 50.6 49.0 57.757.5
57.4 48.4 49.6 58.158.0
Vehicle Noise:66.2 64.8 61.7 57.0 66.065.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
27 58 271126
29 63 291135
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP21
16,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,562 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.47
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.71 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.66 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.7 67.1 65.4 59.3 68.567.9
62.3
62.7
61.1 54.7 53.2 61.961.7
61.6 52.6 53.8 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.4 69.0 65.9 61.2 70.269.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 111 516239
55 119 554257
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
165
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP21
14,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,358 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.5 64.8 58.7 67.967.3
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.1 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 101 470218
50 109 504234
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP21
11,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,032 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.27
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.51 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.46 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.0
59.4
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.3
58.3 49.2 50.5 59.058.8
Vehicle Noise:67.1 65.7 62.6 57.8 66.866.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
37 79 367170
39 85 394183
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EACP21
11,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,079 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.1 65.5 63.8 57.7 66.966.3
60.7
61.1
59.5 53.1 51.6 60.360.1
60.0 51.0 52.2 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:68.8 67.4 64.3 59.5 68.668.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 87 403187
43 93 433201
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP21
11,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,032 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.27
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.51 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.46 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.9 65.3 63.6 57.5 66.766.1
60.5
60.9
59.3 52.9 51.4 60.159.9
59.8 50.8 52.0 60.560.4
Vehicle Noise:68.6 67.2 64.1 59.4 68.467.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 84 391182
42 91 420195
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
166
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP21
6,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:614 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.53
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.77 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.72 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.7 63.1 61.3 55.3 64.563.9
58.2
58.7
57.0 50.7 49.1 57.857.6
57.6 48.5 49.8 58.258.1
Vehicle Noise:66.4 64.9 61.9 57.1 66.165.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
28 60 277128
30 64 297138
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EACP21
3,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:279 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.95
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.19 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.15 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.2 59.6 57.9 51.8 61.160.5
54.8
55.2
53.6 47.3 45.7 54.454.2
54.1 45.1 46.3 54.854.7
Vehicle Noise:62.9 61.5 58.4 53.7 62.762.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
16 35 16376
18 38 17682
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP21
5,100
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:474 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.5 60.9 59.2 53.1 62.361.7
56.3
57.1
55.1 48.7 47.2 55.955.6
56.0 47.0 48.2 56.756.6
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.9 59.8 55.1 64.163.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 19289
21 44 20696
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP21
5,300
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:493 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.26 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.22 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.7 61.1 59.3 53.3 62.561.9
56.4
57.3
55.3 48.9 47.3 56.055.8
56.2 47.2 48.4 56.956.8
Vehicle Noise:64.5 63.1 59.9 55.3 64.363.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 42 19791
21 46 21198
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
167
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP21
2,900
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:270 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.10
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.34 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.29 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.3 58.6 57.3 51.3 60.359.7
53.9
54.3
50.3 42.8 51.5 57.757.7
50.6 47.2 51.8 58.158.0
Vehicle Noise:62.0 59.7 57.8 56.3 63.663.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 46 21298
22 48 222103
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP21
2,300
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:214 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-9.11
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -26.34 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -30.30 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.3 57.6 56.3 50.3 59.358.7
52.9
53.3
49.3 41.8 50.5 56.756.7
49.5 46.2 50.8 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:61.0 58.7 56.8 55.3 62.662.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 39 18184
19 41 19188
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP21
900
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:84 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-12.21
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -29.45 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -33.41 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
54.7 53.1 51.3 45.3 54.553.9
48.7
50.0
47.5 41.1 39.6 48.348.0
48.9 39.9 41.1 49.649.5
Vehicle Noise:56.7 55.3 52.0 47.5 56.456.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
5 10 4722
5 11 5023
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP21
5,100
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:474 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.5 60.9 59.2 53.1 62.361.7
56.3
57.1
55.1 48.7 47.2 55.955.6
56.0 47.0 48.2 56.756.6
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.9 59.8 55.1 64.163.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 19289
21 44 20696
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
168
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC23
33,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,143 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.15
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.09 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.04 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.2 70.6 68.8 62.8 72.071.4
65.6
65.6
64.4 58.0 56.5 65.265.0
64.5 55.5 56.7 65.265.1
Vehicle Noise:73.8 72.3 69.4 64.5 73.573.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
102 220 1,022475
110 237 1,100510
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC23
24,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,232 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.66
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.57 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.53 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.7 69.1 67.4 61.3 70.569.9
64.1
64.1
62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5
63.0 54.0 55.2 63.763.6
Vehicle Noise:72.3 70.8 67.9 63.0 72.071.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
81 175 814378
88 189 875406
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC23
19,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,841 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.41 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.37 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.9 68.3 66.5 60.5 69.769.1
63.3
63.3
62.1 55.7 54.2 62.962.6
62.2 53.2 54.4 62.962.8
Vehicle Noise:71.5 70.0 67.0 62.2 71.270.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 154 716332
77 166 770357
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
9,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:846 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.13
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.37 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.33 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.7 56.6 65.965.3
59.6
60.1
58.4 52.1 50.5 59.259.0
58.9 49.9 51.2 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.3 63.3 58.5 67.567.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 74 343159
37 79 368171
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
169
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
10,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,014 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.35
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.59 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.54 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.8 65.3 63.5 57.4 66.766.1
60.4
60.8
59.2 52.9 51.3 60.059.8
59.7 50.7 51.9 60.460.3
Vehicle Noise:68.5 67.1 64.1 59.3 68.367.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 83 386179
42 89 415193
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
8,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:800 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.38
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.8 64.2 62.5 56.4 65.665.0
59.4
59.8
58.2 51.8 50.3 59.058.8
58.7 49.7 50.9 59.459.3
Vehicle Noise:67.5 66.1 63.0 58.2 67.366.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 71 330153
35 76 354165
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
15,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,423 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.88
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.12 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.07 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.7 65.0 58.9 68.167.5
61.9
62.3
60.7 54.3 52.8 61.561.3
61.2 52.2 53.4 61.961.8
Vehicle Noise:70.0 68.6 65.5 60.7 69.869.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
48 104 484225
52 112 520242
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
12,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,144 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.82
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.06 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.02 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.4 65.8 64.0 58.0 67.266.6
60.9
61.4
59.8 53.4 51.8 60.560.3
60.3 51.2 52.5 61.060.8
Vehicle Noise:69.1 67.6 64.6 59.8 68.868.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
42 90 419194
45 97 450209
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
170
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC23
5,400
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:502 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.94
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.18 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.14 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.8 61.2 59.4 53.3 62.662.0
56.5
57.4
55.3 49.0 47.4 56.155.9
56.3 47.2 48.5 57.056.8
Vehicle Noise:64.6 63.2 60.0 55.3 64.363.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 19993
21 46 21499
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
13,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,228 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.52
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.76 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.71 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.6 62.8 56.7 66.065.4
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 412191
44 95 442205
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
11,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,088 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.28 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.24 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.6 64.0 62.3 56.2 65.464.8
59.2
59.6
58.0 51.6 50.1 58.858.6
58.5 49.5 50.7 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.3 65.9 62.8 58.1 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 82 380176
41 88 408189
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
10,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:958 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.60
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.83 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.79 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.6 65.0 63.2 57.2 66.465.8
60.2
60.6
59.0 52.6 51.1 59.859.5
59.5 50.5 51.7 60.260.1
Vehicle Noise:68.3 66.9 63.8 59.0 68.067.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
37 80 372173
40 86 400186
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
171
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
9,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:856 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 74 345160
37 80 371172
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
9,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:837 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.18
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.42 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.38 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.4 62.7 56.6 65.865.2
59.6
60.0
58.4 52.0 50.5 59.258.9
58.9 49.9 51.1 59.659.5
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.3 63.2 58.4 67.567.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 73 340158
37 79 365170
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC23
9,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:856 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 74 345160
37 80 371172
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC23
16,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,562 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.47
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.71 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.66 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.7 67.1 65.4 59.3 68.567.9
62.3
62.7
61.1 54.7 53.2 61.961.7
61.6 52.6 53.8 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.4 69.0 65.9 61.2 70.269.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 111 516239
55 119 554257
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
172
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC23
15,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,460 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.76
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.00 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.96 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 66.8 65.1 59.0 68.267.6
62.0
62.4
60.8 54.4 52.9 61.661.4
61.3 52.3 53.5 62.061.9
Vehicle Noise:70.1 68.7 65.6 60.9 69.969.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
49 106 493229
53 114 529246
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC23
11,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,107 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.3 65.564.9
59.3
59.7
58.1 51.7 50.2 58.958.6
58.6 49.5 50.8 59.359.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 66.0 62.9 58.1 67.166.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 83 384178
41 89 413192
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EAC23
12,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,172 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 65.9 64.1 58.1 67.366.7
61.0
61.5
59.9 53.5 51.9 60.660.4
60.4 51.3 52.6 61.160.9
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.7 64.7 59.9 68.968.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 92 426198
46 99 457212
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC23
12,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,153 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.79
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.03 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.98 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.4 65.8 64.0 58.0 67.266.6
61.0
61.4
59.8 53.4 51.9 60.660.3
60.3 51.3 52.5 61.060.9
Vehicle Noise:69.1 67.7 64.6 59.8 68.868.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
42 91 421195
45 97 452210
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
173
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC23
7,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:716 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.3 63.7 62.0 55.9 65.164.5
58.9
59.3
57.7 51.4 49.8 58.558.3
58.2 49.2 50.4 58.958.8
Vehicle Noise:67.0 65.6 62.5 57.8 66.866.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 66 306142
33 71 329153
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EAC23
3,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:326 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.28
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.52 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.48 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.9 60.3 58.6 52.5 61.761.1
55.5
55.9
54.3 47.9 46.4 55.154.8
54.8 45.8 47.0 55.555.4
Vehicle Noise:63.6 62.2 59.1 54.3 63.462.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 39 18184
19 42 19590
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC23
5,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:465 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.28
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.51 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.47 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.4 60.8 59.1 53.0 62.261.6
56.2
57.0
55.0 48.6 47.1 55.855.6
55.9 46.9 48.1 56.656.5
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.8 59.7 55.0 64.063.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 18988
20 44 20394
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC23
5,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:484 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.11
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.34 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.30 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.6 61.0 59.2 53.2 62.461.8
56.4
57.2
55.2 48.8 47.3 56.055.7
56.1 47.1 48.3 56.856.7
Vehicle Noise:64.4 63.0 59.9 55.2 64.263.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 42 19490
21 45 20997
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
174
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC23
3,600
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:335 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.16
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.40 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.35 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.2 59.5 58.2 52.2 61.260.6
54.8
55.2
51.2 43.7 52.5 58.758.6
51.5 48.1 52.7 59.058.9
Vehicle Noise:62.9 60.7 58.8 57.2 64.664.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
24 53 245114
26 55 257119
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC23
2,500
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:233 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.74
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.98 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.94 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
59.6 57.9 56.6 50.6 59.759.0
53.2
53.6
49.6 42.1 50.9 57.157.1
49.9 46.5 51.2 57.557.4
Vehicle Noise:61.3 59.1 57.2 55.7 63.062.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
19 41 19289
20 43 20193
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC23
800
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:74 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-12.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -29.96 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -33.92 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
54.2 52.6 50.8 44.8 54.053.4
48.2
49.5
47.0 40.6 39.1 47.847.5
48.4 39.3 40.6 49.148.9
Vehicle Noise:56.2 54.8 51.5 46.9 55.955.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
4 9 4320
5 10 4621
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC23
5,400
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:502 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.94
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.18 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.14 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.8 61.2 59.4 53.3 62.662.0
56.5
57.4
55.3 49.0 47.4 56.155.9
56.3 47.2 48.5 57.056.8
Vehicle Noise:64.6 63.2 60.0 55.3 64.363.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 19993
21 46 21499
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
175
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP23
33,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,153 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.16
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.07 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.03 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.2 70.6 68.9 62.8 72.071.4
65.6
65.6
64.4 58.1 56.5 65.265.0
64.5 55.5 56.7 65.265.1
Vehicle Noise:73.8 72.3 69.4 64.5 73.573.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
102 221 1,024475
110 237 1,102511
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP23
24,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,241 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.68
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.56 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.51 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.7 69.1 67.4 61.3 70.569.9
64.1
64.2
62.9 56.6 55.0 63.763.5
63.1 54.0 55.3 63.763.6
Vehicle Noise:72.3 70.9 67.9 63.0 72.171.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
82 176 816379
88 189 878407
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP23
20,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,860 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.13
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.37 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -21.32 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.9 68.3 66.6 60.5 69.769.1
63.3
63.4
62.1 55.8 54.2 62.962.7
62.2 53.2 54.5 62.962.8
Vehicle Noise:71.5 70.0 67.1 62.2 71.270.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 155 721334
78 167 775360
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
9,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:856 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 74 345160
37 80 371172
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
176
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
11,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,023 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.31
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.55 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.50 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.9 65.3 63.5 57.5 66.766.1
60.5
60.9
59.3 52.9 51.4 60.159.8
59.8 50.7 52.0 60.560.3
Vehicle Noise:68.6 67.1 64.1 59.3 68.367.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 84 389180
42 90 418194
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
8,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:828 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.47 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.42 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.0 64.4 62.6 56.6 65.865.2
59.5
60.0
58.3 52.0 50.4 59.158.9
58.9 49.8 51.1 59.559.4
Vehicle Noise:67.7 66.2 63.2 58.4 67.466.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 73 338157
36 78 363168
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
16,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,488 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.68
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.92 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.88 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.5 66.9 65.2 59.1 68.367.7
62.1
62.5
60.9 54.5 53.0 61.761.4
61.4 52.4 53.6 62.162.0
Vehicle Noise:70.2 68.8 65.7 60.9 70.069.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
50 108 499232
54 116 536249
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
13,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,237 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.7 66.1 64.3 58.3 67.566.9
61.3
61.7
60.1 53.7 52.2 60.960.6
60.6 51.6 52.8 61.361.2
Vehicle Noise:69.4 68.0 64.9 60.1 69.268.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
44 95 441205
47 102 474220
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
177
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP23
5,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:539 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.63
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.87 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.83 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 61.5 59.7 53.7 62.962.3
56.8
57.7
55.6 49.3 47.7 56.456.2
56.6 47.5 48.8 57.357.1
Vehicle Noise:64.9 63.5 60.3 55.7 64.664.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20997
22 48 224104
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
13,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,237 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.72 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.68 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.6 62.8 56.8 66.065.4
59.7
60.2
58.6 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.1 50.0 51.3 59.859.6
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 414192
44 96 444206
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
11,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,097 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.00
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.24 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.20 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.3 65.564.9
59.2
59.6
58.0 51.7 50.1 58.858.6
58.5 49.5 50.8 59.259.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 65.9 62.9 58.1 67.166.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 82 382177
41 88 410190
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
10,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:967 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.79 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.75 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.6 65.0 63.3 57.2 66.565.8
60.2
60.6
59.0 52.7 51.1 59.859.6
59.5 50.5 51.7 60.260.1
Vehicle Noise:68.3 66.9 63.8 59.1 68.167.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
37 81 374174
40 87 402187
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
178
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
9,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:865 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.6 62.8 56.7 66.065.4
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.0 50.0 51.3 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 348161
37 80 373173
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
9,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:865 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.6 62.8 56.7 66.065.4
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.0 50.0 51.3 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 348161
37 80 373173
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP23
9,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:856 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.7 56.7 65.965.3
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 74 345160
37 80 371172
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP23
16,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,572 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.44
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.68 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.64 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.7 67.2 65.4 59.3 68.668.0
62.3
62.7
61.1 54.8 53.2 61.961.7
61.6 52.6 53.9 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.4 69.0 66.0 61.2 70.269.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 112 518240
56 120 556258
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
179
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP23
15,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,460 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.76
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.00 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.96 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 66.8 65.1 59.0 68.267.6
62.0
62.4
60.8 54.4 52.9 61.661.4
61.3 52.3 53.5 62.061.9
Vehicle Noise:70.1 68.7 65.6 60.9 69.969.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
49 106 493229
53 114 529246
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP23
11,900
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,107 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.97
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.1 62.3 56.3 65.564.9
59.3
59.7
58.1 51.7 50.2 58.958.6
58.6 49.5 50.8 59.359.1
Vehicle Noise:67.4 66.0 62.9 58.1 67.166.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 83 384178
41 89 413192
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EACP23
12,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,181 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.69
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.92 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.88 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 65.9 64.1 58.1 67.366.7
61.1
61.5
59.9 53.5 52.0 60.760.4
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.8 64.7 59.9 69.068.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 92 428199
46 99 460213
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP23
12,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,172 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 65.9 64.1 58.1 67.366.7
61.0
61.5
59.9 53.5 51.9 60.660.4
60.4 51.3 52.6 61.160.9
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.7 64.7 59.9 68.968.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 92 426198
46 99 457212
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
180
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP23
7,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:725 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -21.04 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -25.00 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.8 62.0 56.0 65.264.6
59.0
59.4
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.3
58.3 49.2 50.5 59.058.8
Vehicle Noise:67.1 65.6 62.6 57.8 66.866.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
31 67 309143
33 72 332154
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EACP23
3,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:335 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.16
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.40 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.35 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.0 60.4 58.7 52.6 61.861.2
55.6
56.0
54.4 48.1 46.5 55.255.0
54.9 45.9 47.1 55.655.5
Vehicle Noise:63.7 62.3 59.2 54.5 63.563.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
18 40 18586
20 43 19892
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP23
5,500
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:512 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -22.10 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -26.06 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.8 61.2 59.5 53.4 62.762.0
56.6
57.5
55.4 49.1 47.5 56.256.0
56.3 47.3 48.6 57.056.9
Vehicle Noise:64.7 63.2 60.1 55.4 64.464.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 20294
22 47 217101
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP23
5,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:539 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.63
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.87 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.83 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 61.5 59.7 53.7 62.962.3
56.8
57.7
55.6 49.3 47.7 56.456.2
56.6 47.5 48.8 57.357.1
Vehicle Noise:64.9 63.5 60.3 55.7 64.664.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20997
22 48 224104
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
181
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP23
3,800
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:353 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.16 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.12 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.5 59.8 58.5 52.4 61.560.9
55.0
55.5
51.5 44.0 52.7 58.958.9
51.7 48.3 53.0 59.359.2
Vehicle Noise:63.2 60.9 59.0 57.5 64.864.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 55 254118
27 57 266124
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP23
2,700
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:251 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.41
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -25.65 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -29.60 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.0 58.3 57.0 51.0 60.059.4
53.6
54.0
50.0 42.5 51.2 57.457.4
50.2 46.8 51.5 57.857.7
Vehicle Noise:61.7 59.4 57.5 56.0 63.363.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
20 43 20294
21 46 21298
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP23
1,000
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:93 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-11.75
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -28.99 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -32.95 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
55.1 53.5 51.8 45.7 55.054.4
49.1
50.5
47.9 41.6 40.0 48.748.5
49.4 40.3 41.6 50.049.9
Vehicle Noise:57.2 55.7 52.5 47.9 56.956.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
5 11 5023
5 12 5325
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP23
5,900
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:549 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.80 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.75 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 61.6 59.8 53.7 63.062.4
56.9
57.8
55.7 49.4 47.8 56.556.3
56.7 47.6 48.9 57.357.2
Vehicle Noise:65.0 63.6 60.4 55.7 64.764.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 46 21298
23 49 227105
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
182
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC26
36,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,395 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -14.75 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -18.71 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.5 70.9 69.2 63.1 72.371.7
65.9
66.0
64.7 58.4 56.8 65.565.3
64.9 55.8 57.1 65.665.4
Vehicle Noise:74.1 72.7 69.7 64.8 73.973.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
108 232 1,076499
116 249 1,158537
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC26
25,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,399 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.26 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.22 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.0 69.4 67.7 61.6 70.870.2
64.4
64.5
63.2 56.9 55.3 64.063.8
63.4 54.3 55.6 64.063.9
Vehicle Noise:72.6 71.2 68.2 63.3 72.471.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
85 184 854396
92 198 919426
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EAC26
21,700
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,018 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -17.01 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.97 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.3 68.7 66.9 60.9 70.169.5
63.7
63.7
62.5 56.1 54.6 63.363.0
62.6 53.6 54.8 63.363.2
Vehicle Noise:71.8 70.4 67.4 62.6 71.671.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
76 164 761353
82 176 818380
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
10,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,004 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.39
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.63 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.58 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.8 65.2 63.4 57.4 66.666.0
60.4
60.8
59.2 52.8 51.3 60.059.7
59.7 50.7 51.9 60.460.3
Vehicle Noise:68.5 67.1 64.0 59.2 68.267.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 83 384178
41 89 413191
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
183
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
13,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,237 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.7 66.1 64.3 58.3 67.566.9
61.3
61.7
60.1 53.7 52.2 60.960.6
60.6 51.6 52.8 61.361.2
Vehicle Noise:69.4 68.0 64.9 60.1 69.268.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
44 95 441205
47 102 474220
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
10,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:967 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.79 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.75 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.6 65.0 63.3 57.2 66.565.8
60.2
60.6
59.0 52.7 51.1 59.859.6
59.5 50.5 51.7 60.260.1
Vehicle Noise:68.3 66.9 63.8 59.1 68.167.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
37 81 374174
40 87 402187
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
18,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,693 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.12
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.36 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.32 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.1 67.5 65.7 59.7 68.968.3
62.6
63.1
61.5 55.1 53.5 62.262.0
62.0 52.9 54.2 62.762.5
Vehicle Noise:70.8 69.3 66.3 61.5 70.570.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
54 117 544252
58 126 584271
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
14,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,330 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.41 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.36 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.0 66.4 64.7 58.6 67.867.2
61.6
62.0
60.4 54.0 52.5 61.261.0
60.9 51.9 53.1 61.661.5
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.3 65.2 60.5 69.569.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 100 463215
50 107 497231
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
184
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EAC26
6,600
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:614 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.07
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.31 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.26 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.6 62.0 60.3 54.2 63.462.8
57.4
58.2
56.2 49.8 48.3 57.056.8
57.1 48.1 49.4 57.857.7
Vehicle Noise:65.5 64.0 60.9 56.2 65.264.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 49 228106
24 53 245113
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
13,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,283 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.32
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.8 63.0 56.9 66.265.6
59.9
60.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
59.2 50.2 51.4 59.959.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.6 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
42 91 424197
46 98 455211
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
13,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,218 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.79 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.75 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.5 62.8 56.7 65.965.3
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.1 50.6 59.359.0
59.0 50.0 51.2 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 88 409190
44 95 440204
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
12,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,200 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.62
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.6 66.0 64.2 58.2 67.466.8
61.2
61.6
60.0 53.6 52.1 60.760.5
60.5 51.4 52.7 61.261.0
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.8 64.8 60.0 69.068.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 93 432201
46 100 464216
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
185
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
12,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,172 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 65.9 64.1 58.1 67.366.7
61.0
61.5
59.9 53.5 51.9 60.660.4
60.4 51.3 52.6 61.160.9
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.7 64.7 59.9 68.968.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 92 426198
46 99 457212
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
12,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,116 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.17 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.13 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.3 65.7 63.9 57.8 67.166.5
60.8
61.3
59.6 53.3 51.7 60.460.2
60.1 51.1 52.4 60.860.7
Vehicle Noise:69.0 67.5 64.5 59.7 68.768.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 412191
44 95 443205
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EAC26
12,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,172 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 65.9 64.1 58.1 67.366.7
61.0
61.5
59.9 53.5 51.9 60.660.4
60.4 51.3 52.6 61.160.9
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.7 64.7 59.9 68.968.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 92 426198
46 99 457212
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC26
17,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,581 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.42
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.66 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.61 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.8 67.2 65.4 59.4 68.668.0
62.3
62.8
61.2 54.8 53.3 61.961.7
61.7 52.6 53.9 62.462.2
Vehicle Noise:70.5 69.0 66.0 61.2 70.269.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 112 520241
56 120 558259
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
186
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC26
17,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,618 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.32
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.56 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.51 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.3 65.5 59.5 68.768.1
62.5
62.9
61.3 54.9 53.4 62.061.8
61.8 52.7 54.0 62.562.3
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.1 66.1 61.3 70.369.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 114 528245
57 122 567263
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EAC26
13,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,237 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.72 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.68 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.6 62.8 56.8 66.065.4
59.7
60.2
58.6 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.1 50.0 51.3 59.859.6
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 89 414192
44 96 444206
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EAC26
14,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,321 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.20
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.44 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.40 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.0 66.4 64.6 58.6 67.867.2
61.6
62.0
60.4 54.0 52.5 61.260.9
60.9 51.8 53.1 61.661.4
Vehicle Noise:69.7 68.2 65.2 60.4 69.469.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 99 461214
50 107 495230
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC26
14,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,367 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.05
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.29 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.24 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.6 64.8 58.7 68.067.4
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.2 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.4 60.6 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 102 472219
51 109 507235
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
187
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EAC26
9,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:865 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.1 64.6 62.8 56.7 66.065.4
59.7
60.1
58.5 52.2 50.6 59.359.1
59.0 50.0 51.3 59.759.6
Vehicle Noise:67.8 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.667.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 348161
37 80 373173
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EAC26
4,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:409 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.29
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.53 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.48 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.9 61.3 59.5 53.5 62.762.1
56.5
56.9
55.3 48.9 47.4 56.155.8
55.8 46.8 48.0 56.556.4
Vehicle Noise:64.6 63.2 60.1 55.3 64.363.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 21198
23 49 227105
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC26
5,700
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:530 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.71
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.95 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.90 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.0 61.4 59.6 53.6 62.862.2
56.8
57.6
55.6 49.2 47.7 56.456.1
56.5 47.5 48.7 57.257.1
Vehicle Noise:64.8 63.4 60.2 55.6 64.664.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 45 20796
22 48 222103
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC26
5,900
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:549 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.80 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.75 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.1 61.6 59.8 53.7 63.062.4
56.9
57.8
55.7 49.4 47.8 56.556.3
56.7 47.6 48.9 57.357.2
Vehicle Noise:65.0 63.6 60.4 55.7 64.764.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
21 46 21298
23 49 227105
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
188
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC26
4,900
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:456 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.82
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.06 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.02 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
62.6 60.9 59.6 53.5 62.662.0
56.1
56.6
52.6 45.1 53.8 60.060.0
52.8 49.4 54.1 60.460.3
Vehicle Noise:64.3 62.0 60.1 58.6 65.965.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
30 65 300139
32 68 315146
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EAC26
3,300
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:307 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-7.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.78 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.73 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
60.8 59.2 57.8 51.8 60.960.2
54.4
54.8
50.8 43.3 52.1 58.358.3
51.1 47.7 52.4 58.758.6
Vehicle Noise:62.5 60.3 58.4 56.9 64.263.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 50 231107
24 52 242112
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC26
1,100
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:102 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-11.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -28.58 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -32.53 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
55.5 54.0 52.2 46.1 55.454.8
49.6
50.9
48.4 42.0 40.5 49.148.9
49.8 40.7 42.0 50.550.3
Vehicle Noise:57.6 56.2 52.9 48.3 57.356.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
5 11 5325
6 12 5726
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EAC26
6,900
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:642 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.88
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.12 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.07 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.8 62.2 60.5 54.4 63.663.0
57.6
58.4
56.4 50.0 48.5 57.257.0
57.3 48.3 49.5 58.057.9
Vehicle Noise:65.7 64.2 61.1 56.4 65.464.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
23 51 235109
25 54 252117
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
189
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP26
37,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,441 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -14.69 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -18.65 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.6 71.0 69.2 63.2 72.471.8
66.0
66.0
64.8 58.4 56.9 65.665.3
64.9 55.9 57.1 65.665.5
Vehicle Noise:74.2 72.7 69.8 64.9 73.973.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
109 234 1,086504
117 252 1,168542
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP26
26,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,465 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.09
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.14 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.10 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.1 69.5 67.8 61.7 71.070.4
64.5
64.6
63.3 57.0 55.4 64.163.9
63.5 54.4 55.7 64.264.0
Vehicle Noise:72.7 71.3 68.3 63.4 72.572.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
87 187 869403
94 201 935434
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:EACP26
22,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,093 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.38
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -16.85 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -20.81 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.4 68.8 67.1 61.0 70.269.6
63.8
63.9
62.6 56.3 54.7 63.463.2
62.8 53.7 55.0 63.563.3
Vehicle Noise:72.0 70.6 67.6 62.7 71.871.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
78 168 779362
84 181 838389
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
11,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,051 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.4 63.6 57.6 66.866.2
60.6
61.0
59.4 53.0 51.5 60.259.9
59.9 50.9 52.1 60.660.5
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.3 64.2 59.4 68.468.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
40 85 396184
43 92 425197
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
190
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
14,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,302 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.26
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.50 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.46 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.3 64.6 58.5 67.767.1
61.5
61.9
60.3 54.0 52.4 61.160.9
60.8 51.8 53.0 61.561.4
Vehicle Noise:69.6 68.2 65.1 60.4 69.468.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 98 457212
49 106 490228
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
11,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,088 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.04
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.28 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.24 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.1 65.6 63.8 57.7 67.066.4
60.7
61.1
59.5 53.2 51.6 60.360.1
60.0 51.0 52.3 60.760.6
Vehicle Noise:68.8 67.4 64.4 59.6 68.668.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
41 87 405188
44 94 435202
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
20,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,925 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.44
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.80 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.76 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.6 68.0 66.3 60.2 69.468.8
63.2
63.6
62.0 55.7 54.1 62.862.6
62.5 53.5 54.7 63.263.1
Vehicle Noise:71.3 69.9 66.8 62.1 71.170.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
59 128 593275
64 137 637295
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
17,400
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,618 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.32
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.56 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.51 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.3 65.5 59.5 68.768.1
62.5
62.9
61.3 54.9 53.4 62.061.8
61.8 52.7 54.0 62.562.3
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.1 66.1 61.3 70.369.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 114 528245
57 122 567263
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
191
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:EACP26
7,600
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:707 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -20.70 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -24.65 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.2 62.7 60.9 54.8 64.163.5
58.0
58.9
56.8 50.5 48.9 57.657.4
57.8 48.7 50.0 58.458.3
Vehicle Noise:66.1 64.7 61.5 56.8 65.865.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 54 250116
27 58 269125
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
14,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,330 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.41 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.36 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.5 64.9 63.1 57.1 66.365.7
60.1
60.5
58.9 52.5 51.0 59.759.4
59.4 50.3 51.6 60.159.9
Vehicle Noise:68.2 66.8 63.7 58.9 67.967.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 94 434201
47 100 466216
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
13,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,283 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.32
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.8 63.0 56.9 66.265.6
59.9
60.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
59.2 50.2 51.4 59.959.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.6 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
42 91 424197
46 98 455211
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
13,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,265 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.39
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.63 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.58 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.2 64.4 58.4 67.667.0
61.4
61.8
60.2 53.8 52.3 61.060.7
60.7 51.7 52.9 61.461.3
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.1 65.0 60.2 69.268.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 96 448208
48 104 481223
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
192
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
13,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,237 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.49
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.7 66.1 64.3 58.3 67.566.9
61.3
61.7
60.1 53.7 52.2 60.960.6
60.6 51.6 52.8 61.361.2
Vehicle Noise:69.4 68.0 64.9 60.1 69.268.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
44 95 441205
47 102 474220
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
13,100
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,218 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.55
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.79 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.75 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.6 66.1 64.3 58.2 67.566.9
61.2
61.6
60.0 53.7 52.1 60.860.6
60.5 51.5 52.7 61.261.1
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.9 64.9 60.1 69.168.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
44 94 437203
47 101 469218
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:EACP26
12,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,190 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.65
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.89 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.85 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.5 66.0 64.2 58.1 67.466.8
61.1
61.5
59.9 53.6 52.0 60.760.5
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:69.2 67.8 64.7 60.0 69.068.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
43 93 430200
46 100 462214
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP26
17,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,628 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.29
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.53 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.49 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.3 65.5 59.5 68.768.1
62.5
62.9
61.3 54.9 53.4 62.161.8
61.8 52.8 54.0 62.562.4
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.1 61.3 70.369.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 114 530246
57 123 569264
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
193
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP26
17,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,637 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.27
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.51 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.46 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.3 65.6 59.5 68.768.1
62.5
62.9
61.3 54.9 53.4 62.161.9
61.8 52.8 54.0 62.562.4
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.1 61.4 70.469.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 115 532247
57 123 571265
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:EACP26
13,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,256 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.42
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.66 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.61 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.7 62.9 56.8 66.165.5
59.8
60.2
58.6 52.3 50.7 59.459.2
59.1 50.1 51.3 59.859.7
Vehicle Noise:67.9 66.5 63.5 58.7 67.767.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
42 90 418194
45 97 449208
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:EACP26
14,600
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,358 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.5 64.8 58.7 67.967.3
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.1 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
47 101 470218
50 109 504234
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP26
15,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,442 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.82
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.06 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.01 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 66.8 65.0 59.0 68.267.6
61.9
62.4
60.8 54.4 52.8 61.561.3
61.3 52.2 53.5 62.061.8
Vehicle Noise:70.1 68.6 65.6 60.8 69.869.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
49 105 489227
52 113 525244
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
194
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:EACP26
9,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:902 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.86
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.7 63.0 56.9 66.265.5
59.9
60.3
58.7 52.4 50.8 59.559.3
59.2 50.2 51.4 59.959.8
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.5 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
36 77 357166
38 83 384178
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:EACP26
4,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:446 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.91
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -23.15 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -27.11 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.3 61.7 59.9 53.9 63.162.5
56.9
57.3
55.7 49.3 47.8 56.556.2
56.2 47.1 48.4 56.956.7
Vehicle Noise:65.0 63.5 60.5 55.7 64.764.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
22 48 224104
24 52 240112
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP26
6,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:577 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-4.34
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -21.58 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -25.54 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.4 61.8 60.0 53.9 63.262.6
57.1
58.0
55.9 49.6 48.0 56.756.5
56.9 47.8 49.1 57.657.4
Vehicle Noise:65.2 63.8 60.6 55.9 64.964.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
22 47 219101
23 51 235109
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP26
7,800
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:725 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.35
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -20.58 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -24.54 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.3 62.8 61.0 54.9 64.263.6
58.1
59.0
56.9 50.6 49.0 57.757.5
57.9 48.8 50.1 58.658.4
Vehicle Noise:66.2 64.8 61.6 56.9 65.965.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
25 55 255118
27 59 273127
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
195
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP26
5,700
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:530 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-5.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -22.40 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -26.36 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
63.2 61.5 60.2 54.2 63.262.6
56.8
57.2
53.2 45.7 54.5 60.760.6
53.5 50.1 54.7 61.060.9
Vehicle Noise:64.9 62.7 60.8 59.2 66.666.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
33 72 332154
35 75 349162
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:EACP26
3,900
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:363 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-6.81
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -24.05 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -28.01 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
61.6 59.9 58.6 52.6 61.661.0
55.1
55.6
51.6 44.1 52.8 59.059.0
51.8 48.4 53.1 59.459.3
Vehicle Noise:63.3 61.0 59.1 57.6 64.964.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 56 258120
27 58 271126
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP26
2,300
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:214 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-8.14
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -25.38 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -29.33 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.8 57.2 55.4 49.3 58.658.0
52.8
54.1
51.6 45.2 43.7 52.352.1
53.0 43.9 45.2 53.753.5
Vehicle Noise:60.8 59.4 56.1 51.5 60.560.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
9 19 8740
9 20 9343
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:EACP26
8,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:763 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-3.13
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -20.37 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -24.32 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
64.6 63.0 61.2 55.2 64.463.8
58.3
59.2
57.2 50.8 49.2 57.957.7
58.1 49.0 50.3 58.858.7
Vehicle Noise:66.4 65.0 61.8 57.2 66.265.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
26 57 263122
28 61 283131
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
196
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GP40
51,500
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:4,790 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
3.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -13.26 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -17.21 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
74.0 72.4 70.7 64.6 73.873.2
67.4
67.5
66.2 59.9 58.3 67.066.8
66.4 57.3 58.6 67.066.9
Vehicle Noise:75.6 74.2 71.2 66.3 75.474.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
135 292 1,354628
146 314 1,456676
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GP40
34,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,190 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.22
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.02 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -18.98 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.3 70.7 68.9 62.8 72.171.5
65.7
65.7
64.5 58.1 56.6 65.365.0
64.6 55.6 56.8 65.365.2
Vehicle Noise:73.8 72.4 69.4 64.6 73.673.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
103 222 1,032479
111 239 1,111515
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GP40
32,200
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,995 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.94
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.30 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.25 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.0 70.4 68.6 62.6 71.871.2
65.4
65.4
64.2 57.8 56.3 65.064.7
64.3 55.3 56.5 65.064.9
Vehicle Noise:73.6 72.1 69.2 64.3 73.372.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
99 213 990459
106 229 1,065494
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
22,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,093 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.44 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.40 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.0 68.4 66.6 60.6 69.869.2
63.6
64.0
62.4 56.0 54.5 63.262.9
62.9 53.8 55.1 63.663.4
Vehicle Noise:71.7 70.2 67.2 62.4 71.471.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
63 135 626291
67 145 673312
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
197
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
32,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,004 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.37
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.87 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.83 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.6 70.0 68.2 62.1 71.470.8
65.1
65.6
63.9 57.6 56.0 64.764.5
64.4 55.4 56.7 65.165.0
Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.8 68.8 64.0 73.072.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
80 172 797370
86 185 856398
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
23,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,204 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.21 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.17 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.2 68.6 66.9 60.8 70.069.4
63.8
64.2
62.6 56.2 54.7 63.463.2
63.1 54.1 55.3 63.863.7
Vehicle Noise:71.9 70.5 67.4 62.6 71.771.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
65 140 649301
70 150 697323
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
42,500
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,953 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
3.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -13.68 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -17.63 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.7 71.2 69.4 63.3 72.672.0
66.3
66.7
65.1 58.8 57.2 65.965.7
65.6 56.6 57.9 66.366.2
Vehicle Noise:74.4 73.0 70.0 65.2 74.273.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
96 206 957444
103 222 1,028477
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
31,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,883 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.05 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.00 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.4 69.8 68.0 62.0 71.270.6
65.0
65.4
63.8 57.4 55.9 64.664.3
64.3 55.2 56.5 65.064.8
Vehicle Noise:73.1 71.6 68.6 63.8 72.872.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
78 167 776360
83 180 833387
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
198
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GP40
19,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,767 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.52
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.72 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.67 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.2 66.6 64.9 58.8 68.067.4
62.0
62.8
60.8 54.4 52.9 61.661.4
61.7 52.7 53.9 62.462.3
Vehicle Noise:70.1 68.6 65.5 60.8 69.869.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 99 461214
49 107 495230
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
15,100
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,404 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.93
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.17 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -22.13 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.7 65.1 63.4 57.3 66.565.9
60.3
60.7
59.1 52.7 51.2 59.959.7
59.6 50.6 51.8 60.360.2
Vehicle Noise:68.4 67.0 63.9 59.2 68.267.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
45 97 450209
48 104 484224
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
19,300
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,795 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.13
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.11 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.06 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.8 66.2 64.4 58.4 67.667.0
61.4
61.8
60.2 53.8 52.3 61.060.7
60.7 51.6 52.9 61.461.2
Vehicle Noise:69.5 68.1 65.0 60.2 69.268.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 114 530246
57 123 570264
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
31,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,911 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.23
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.01 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.96 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.4 69.8 68.1 62.0 71.270.6
65.0
65.4
63.8 57.4 55.9 64.664.4
64.3 55.3 56.5 65.064.9
Vehicle Noise:73.1 71.7 68.6 63.9 72.972.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
78 168 781362
84 181 839389
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
199
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
34,300
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,190 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.63
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.61 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.56 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.8 70.2 68.5 62.4 71.671.0
65.4
65.8
64.2 57.8 56.3 65.064.8
64.7 55.7 56.9 65.465.3
Vehicle Noise:73.5 72.1 69.0 64.3 73.372.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
83 179 830385
89 192 891414
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
24,900
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,316 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.24
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.00 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.96 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.4 68.8 67.1 61.0 70.269.6
64.0
64.4
62.8 56.5 54.9 63.663.4
63.3 54.3 55.5 64.063.9
Vehicle Noise:72.1 70.7 67.6 62.9 71.971.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
67 144 670311
72 155 720334
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GP40
26,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,492 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.56
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.68 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.64 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.7 69.2 67.4 61.3 70.670.0
64.3
64.7
63.1 56.8 55.2 63.963.7
63.6 54.6 55.9 64.364.2
Vehicle Noise:72.4 71.0 68.0 63.2 72.271.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
70 152 704327
76 163 756351
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GP40
17,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,600 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.37
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.61 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.56 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.8 67.2 65.5 59.4 68.668.0
62.4
62.8
61.2 54.8 53.3 62.061.8
61.7 52.7 53.9 62.462.3
Vehicle Noise:70.5 69.1 66.0 61.3 70.369.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 113 524243
56 121 563261
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
200
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GP40
27,800
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,585 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.52 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.48 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.9 69.3 67.6 61.5 70.770.1
64.5
64.9
63.3 56.9 55.4 64.163.8
63.8 54.8 56.0 64.564.4
Vehicle Noise:72.6 71.2 68.1 63.3 72.471.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 155 721335
77 167 775360
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GP40
20,800
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,934 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.78 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.74 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.1 66.5 64.8 58.7 67.967.3
61.7
62.1
60.5 54.1 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.2 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.8 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
56 120 557259
60 129 599278
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:GP40
25,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,390 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.38
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.86 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.82 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.6 69.0 67.2 61.2 70.469.8
64.1
64.6
63.0 56.6 55.0 63.763.5
63.5 54.4 55.7 64.264.0
Vehicle Noise:72.3 70.8 67.8 63.0 72.071.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
68 147 685318
74 158 735341
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:GP40
30,200
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,809 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.08
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.16 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.12 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.3 69.7 67.9 61.9 71.170.5
64.8
65.3
63.7 57.3 55.7 64.464.2
64.2 55.1 56.4 64.964.7
Vehicle Noise:73.0 71.5 68.5 63.7 72.772.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
76 164 762354
82 176 819380
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
201
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:GP40
17,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,646 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.24
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.4 65.6 59.5 68.868.2
62.5
62.9
61.3 55.0 53.4 62.161.9
61.8 52.8 54.1 62.562.4
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.2 61.4 70.469.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 115 534248
57 124 573266
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:GP40
16,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,553 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.50
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.73 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.69 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.7 67.1 65.3 59.3 68.567.9
62.3
62.7
61.1 54.7 53.2 61.961.6
61.6 52.5 53.8 62.362.2
Vehicle Noise:70.4 69.0 65.9 61.1 70.169.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
51 111 514238
55 119 552256
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GP40
11,900
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,107 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.51
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -18.75 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -22.70 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.6 62.8 56.8 66.065.4
60.0
60.8
58.8 52.4 50.9 59.659.3
59.7 50.7 51.9 60.460.3
Vehicle Noise:68.0 66.6 63.4 58.8 67.867.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 73 338157
36 78 362168
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GP40
12,200
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,135 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.40
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -18.64 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -22.60 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.7 62.9 56.9 66.165.5
60.1
60.9
58.9 52.5 51.0 59.759.4
59.8 50.8 52.0 60.560.4
Vehicle Noise:68.1 66.7 63.6 58.9 67.967.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
34 74 343159
37 79 368171
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
202
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GP40
18,200
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,693 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.12
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.36 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.32 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.6 65.3 59.2 68.367.7
61.8
62.3
58.3 50.8 59.5 65.765.7
58.5 55.1 59.8 66.166.0
Vehicle Noise:70.0 67.7 65.8 64.3 71.671.3
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 155 720334
76 163 757351
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GP40
9,400
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:874 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.99
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -20.23 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -24.19 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.4 63.7 62.4 56.4 65.464.8
59.0
59.4
55.4 47.9 56.6 62.862.8
55.7 52.3 56.9 63.263.1
Vehicle Noise:67.1 64.9 62.9 61.4 68.868.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 100 464215
49 105 487226
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:GP40
20,800
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,934 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -15.81 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -19.77 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.7 65.0 58.9 68.167.5
62.3
63.6
61.1 54.8 53.2 61.961.7
62.5 53.5 54.7 63.263.1
Vehicle Noise:70.3 68.9 65.6 61.1 70.169.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 81 378175
40 87 404188
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:GP40
22,700
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,111 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.29
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.94 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.90 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.0 67.4 65.6 59.6 68.868.2
62.8
63.6
61.6 55.2 53.7 62.462.1
62.5 53.5 54.7 63.263.1
Vehicle Noise:70.8 69.4 66.3 61.6 70.670.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 112 519241
56 120 557259
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
203
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GPP40
52,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:4,836 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
4.02
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -13.22 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -17.17 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
74.1 72.5 70.7 64.7 73.973.3
67.5
67.5
66.3 59.9 58.4 67.166.8
66.4 57.4 58.6 67.167.0
Vehicle Noise:75.6 74.2 71.2 66.4 75.474.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
136 294 1,362632
147 316 1,466680
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GPP40
35,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,255 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -14.94 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -18.89 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.3 70.8 69.0 62.9 72.271.6
65.7
65.8
64.6 58.2 56.6 65.365.1
64.7 55.6 56.9 65.465.2
Vehicle Noise:73.9 72.5 69.5 64.6 73.773.2
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
105 225 1,046486
113 243 1,126522
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Jefferson St.
Scenario:GPP40
33,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,069 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
55 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:71 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.05
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.54
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
82.40 -15.19 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
86.40 -19.15 -0.52 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
71.78
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
53.486
53.320
53.337
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
72.1 70.5 68.7 62.7 71.971.3
65.5
65.5
64.3 57.9 56.4 65.164.9
64.4 55.4 56.6 65.165.0
Vehicle Noise:73.7 72.2 69.3 64.4 73.472.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
101 217 1,006467
108 233 1,082502
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
23,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,139 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.89
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.34 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.30 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.1 68.5 66.7 60.7 69.969.3
63.7
64.1
62.5 56.1 54.6 63.363.0
63.0 53.9 55.2 63.763.5
Vehicle Noise:71.8 70.3 67.3 62.5 71.571.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
64 137 636295
68 147 683317
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
204
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
33,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,069 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.46
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.78 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.73 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.6 70.1 68.3 62.2 71.570.9
65.2
65.6
64.0 57.7 56.1 64.864.6
64.5 55.5 56.8 65.265.1
Vehicle Noise:73.3 71.9 68.9 64.1 73.172.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
81 174 809375
87 187 869403
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
25,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,325 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.26
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.98 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.94 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.4 68.9 67.1 61.0 70.369.7
64.0
64.4
62.8 56.5 54.9 63.663.4
63.3 54.3 55.6 64.063.9
Vehicle Noise:72.1 70.7 67.7 62.9 71.971.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
67 145 672312
72 156 722335
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
45,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:4,185 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
3.81
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -13.43 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -17.39 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
73.0 71.4 69.6 63.6 72.872.2
66.6
67.0
65.4 59.0 57.5 66.265.9
65.9 56.9 58.1 66.666.5
Vehicle Noise:74.7 73.3 70.2 65.4 74.474.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
99 214 994462
107 230 1,068496
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
34,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,162 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.65 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.60 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.8 70.2 68.4 62.4 71.671.0
65.4
65.8
64.2 57.8 56.3 65.064.7
64.7 55.6 56.9 65.465.2
Vehicle Noise:73.5 72.0 69.0 64.2 73.272.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
82 178 825383
89 191 886411
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
205
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Madison St.
Scenario:GPP40
20,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,860 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.74
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -16.49 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -20.45 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 66.9 65.1 59.0 68.367.7
62.2
63.1
61.0 54.7 53.1 61.861.6
62.0 52.9 54.2 62.762.5
Vehicle Noise:70.3 68.9 65.7 61.0 70.069.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
48 103 477222
51 110 512238
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 50
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
15,600
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,451 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.79
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -18.03 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.99 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.9 65.3 63.5 57.5 66.766.1
60.4
60.9
59.2 52.9 51.3 60.059.8
59.8 50.7 52.0 60.560.3
Vehicle Noise:68.6 67.1 64.1 59.3 68.367.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
46 99 460214
49 106 494229
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 52
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
20,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,860 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.29
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.95 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.91 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.9 66.4 64.6 58.5 67.867.2
61.5
61.9
60.3 54.0 52.4 61.160.9
60.8 51.8 53.0 61.561.4
Vehicle Noise:69.6 68.2 65.2 60.4 69.468.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
54 117 543252
58 126 583271
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 54
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
32,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,976 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.33
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.91 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.87 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.5 69.9 68.2 62.1 71.370.7
65.1
65.5
63.9 57.5 56.0 64.764.5
64.4 55.4 56.6 65.165.0
Vehicle Noise:73.2 71.8 68.7 63.9 73.072.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
79 171 792368
85 183 851395
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
206
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Airport Bl.
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
35,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:3,255 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -14.52 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -18.48 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.9 70.3 68.6 62.5 71.771.1
65.5
65.9
64.3 57.9 56.4 65.164.8
64.8 55.8 57.0 65.565.4
Vehicle Noise:73.6 72.2 69.1 64.3 73.472.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
84 181 841390
90 195 904419
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 58
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
26,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,418 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.81 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.77 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.6 69.0 67.3 61.2 70.469.8
64.2
64.6
63.0 56.6 55.1 63.863.6
63.5 54.5 55.7 64.264.1
Vehicle Noise:72.3 70.9 67.8 63.0 72.171.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
69 149 690320
74 160 741344
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:n/o Avenue 60
Road Name:Monroe St.
Scenario:GPP40
27,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,511 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.59
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.65 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.60 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.8 69.2 67.4 61.4 70.670.0
64.4
64.8
63.2 56.8 55.3 64.063.7
63.7 54.6 55.9 64.464.2
Vehicle Noise:72.5 71.0 68.0 63.2 72.271.8
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
71 152 707328
76 164 760353
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jefferson St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GPP40
17,700
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,646 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.24
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.9 67.4 65.6 59.5 68.868.2
62.5
62.9
61.3 55.0 53.4 62.161.9
61.8 52.8 54.1 62.562.4
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 66.2 61.4 70.469.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
53 115 534248
57 124 573266
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
207
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GPP40
28,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,604 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.75
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.49 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.45 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.9 69.3 67.6 61.5 70.870.2
64.5
64.9
63.3 57.0 55.4 64.163.9
63.8 54.8 56.0 64.564.4
Vehicle Noise:72.6 71.2 68.1 63.4 72.471.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
72 156 725336
78 168 779361
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 50
Scenario:GPP40
21,000
9.30%
64.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,953 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
64.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:43 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.50
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.34
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -16.74 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -20.70 -1.33 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.70
-4.88
-5.31
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
60.488
60.341
60.355
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.2 66.6 64.8 58.8 68.067.4
61.7
62.2
60.5 54.2 52.6 61.361.1
61.0 52.0 53.3 61.761.6
Vehicle Noise:69.9 68.4 65.4 60.6 69.669.1
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
56 121 561260
60 130 602280
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 52
Scenario:GPP40
26,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,418 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.43
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.81 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.77 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
70.6 69.0 67.3 61.2 70.469.8
64.2
64.6
63.0 56.6 55.1 63.863.6
63.5 54.5 55.7 64.264.1
Vehicle Noise:72.3 70.9 67.8 63.0 72.171.6
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
69 149 690320
74 160 741344
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:GPP40
31,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,883 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
2.19
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -15.05 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -19.00 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
71.4 69.8 68.0 62.0 71.270.6
65.0
65.4
63.8 57.4 55.9 64.664.3
64.3 55.2 56.5 65.064.8
Vehicle Noise:73.1 71.6 68.6 63.8 72.872.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
78 167 776360
83 180 833387
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
208
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 54
Scenario:GPP40
18,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,674 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.17
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.41 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.37 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.0 67.4 65.7 59.6 68.868.2
62.6
63.0
61.4 55.0 53.5 62.262.0
61.9 52.9 54.1 62.662.5
Vehicle Noise:70.7 69.3 66.2 61.4 70.570.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
54 116 540251
58 125 580269
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Airport Bl.
Scenario:GPP40
17,000
9.30%
54.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,581 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
54.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:51 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.42
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.66 0.21 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.61 0.20 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.67
-4.87
-5.39
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
47.862
47.677
47.695
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.8 67.2 65.4 59.4 68.668.0
62.3
62.8
61.2 54.8 53.3 61.961.7
61.7 52.6 53.9 62.462.2
Vehicle Noise:70.5 69.0 66.0 61.2 70.269.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
52 112 520241
56 120 558259
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GPP40
12,500
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,163 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-1.30
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -18.54 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -22.49 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.4 64.8 63.0 57.0 66.265.6
60.2
61.0
59.0 52.6 51.1 59.859.5
59.9 50.9 52.1 60.660.5
Vehicle Noise:68.2 66.8 63.7 59.0 68.067.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
35 75 349162
37 81 374174
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GPP40
14,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,302 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.80
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -18.04 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -22.00 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.9 65.3 63.5 57.5 66.766.1
60.7
61.5
59.5 53.1 51.6 60.360.0
60.4 51.4 52.6 61.161.0
Vehicle Noise:68.7 67.3 64.2 59.5 68.568.0
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
38 81 376175
40 87 404187
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
209
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GPP40
19,000
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,767 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
0.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -17.17 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -21.13 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.4 66.8 65.4 59.4 68.567.8
62.0
62.4
58.4 50.9 59.7 65.965.9
58.7 55.3 60.0 66.366.2
Vehicle Noise:70.1 67.9 66.0 64.5 71.871.5
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
74 160 741344
78 168 779361
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:e/o Jackson St.
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:GPP40
10,000
9.30%
59.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:930 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
59.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
50 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:48 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-2.72
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:75.5%14.0%10.5%97.42%
48.9%2.2%48.9%1.84%
47.3%5.4%47.3%0.74%
-0.62
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
81.00 -19.96 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
85.38 -23.92 -0.60 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.69
-4.88
-5.35
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
70.20
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
54.129
53.966
53.982
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.7 64.0 62.7 56.6 65.765.1
59.2
59.7
55.7 48.2 56.9 63.163.1
55.9 52.5 57.2 63.563.4
Vehicle Noise:67.4 65.1 63.2 61.7 69.068.7
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
48 104 483224
51 109 508236
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Madison St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:GPP40
22,000
9.30%
40.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,046 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
40.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
40 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:23 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.67
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
1.58
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
77.72 -15.57 1.62 -1.20 0.000 0.000
82.99 -19.52 1.61 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.59
-4.87
-5.56
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
66.51
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
38.636
38.406
38.429
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.6 67.0 65.2 59.2 68.467.8
62.6
63.9
61.4 55.0 53.5 62.261.9
62.8 53.7 55.0 63.563.3
Vehicle Noise:70.6 69.2 65.9 61.3 70.369.9
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
39 84 392182
42 90 420195
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12642
Road Segment:w/o Monroe St.
Road Name:Avenue 60
Scenario:GPP40
24,000
9.30%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,232 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
51.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Road Grade:0.0%
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.54
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
0.43
Finite Road
-1.20
Left View:-90.0
Right View:90.0
degrees
degrees
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
0.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):0.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
79.45 -15.70 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
84.25 -19.66 0.46 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-4.65
-4.87
-5.42
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
68.46
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
46.041
45.848
45.867
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
69.2 67.6 65.9 59.8 69.168.4
63.0
63.9
61.8 55.5 53.9 62.662.4
62.7 53.7 55.0 63.463.3
Vehicle Noise:71.1 69.6 66.5 61.8 70.870.4
Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
CNEL:
Ldn:
70 dBA 65 dBA 55 dBA60 dBA
54 116 539250
58 125 578268
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
210
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 8.1:
ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
211
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
212
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
12,500
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,250 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
61.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.95
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
10.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-18.22 -0.93 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-22.18 -0.93 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-0.95
-1.15
-1.69
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
56.919
56.763
56.778
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.3 62.5 56.5 65.765.1
57.3
57.8
55.8 49.4 47.9 56.656.3
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:67.3 65.5 62.9 57.6 66.766.2
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.2 64.3 62.5 56.5 65.765.1
57.3
57.8
55.8 49.4 47.9 56.656.3
56.4 47.4 48.6 57.157.0
Vehicle Noise:67.3 65.5 62.9 57.6 66.766.2
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Madison Street
Scenario:Backyard No Wall
20,000
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,000 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
61.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:0.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.95
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
10.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-16.18 -0.93 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-20.13 -0.93 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-0.95
-1.15
-1.69
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
56.919
56.763
56.778
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.4 64.6 58.5 67.867.2
59.3
59.9
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.4
58.5 49.4 50.7 59.159.0
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.5 64.9 59.7 68.868.2
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.4 64.6 58.5 67.867.2
59.3
59.9
57.8 51.4 49.9 58.658.4
58.5 49.4 50.7 59.159.0
Vehicle Noise:69.3 67.5 64.9 59.7 68.868.2
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
12,500
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,250 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
61.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.87
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
10.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
-6.720 -9.720
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-18.22 -0.84 -1.20 -6.160 -9.160
-22.18 -0.83 -1.20 -5.100 -8.100
0.19
0.12
0.01
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
56.210
55.968
55.862
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
66.3 64.4 62.6 56.6 65.865.2
57.4
57.9
55.9 49.5 48.0 56.656.4
56.5 47.5 48.7 57.257.1
Vehicle Noise:67.3 65.5 63.0 57.7 66.866.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
56.6 54.7 52.9 46.9 56.155.5
48.2
49.8
46.7 40.3 38.8 47.547.3
48.4 39.4 40.6 49.149.0
Vehicle Noise:57.9 56.1 53.3 48.3 57.456.9
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Madison Street
Scenario:Backyard With Wall
20,000
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,000 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
61.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-0.87
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
10.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
-6.720 -9.720
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-16.18 -0.84 -1.20 -6.160 -9.160
-20.13 -0.83 -1.20 -5.100 -8.100
0.19
0.12
0.01
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
56.210
55.968
55.862
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
68.3 66.4 64.7 58.6 67.867.2
59.4
60.0
57.9 51.5 50.0 58.758.5
58.6 49.5 50.8 59.359.1
Vehicle Noise:69.4 67.6 65.0 59.8 68.868.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
58.6 56.7 55.0 48.9 58.157.5
50.2
51.9
48.7 42.4 40.8 49.549.3
50.5 41.4 42.7 51.251.0
Vehicle Noise:59.9 58.2 55.4 50.3 59.458.9
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
213
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
12,500
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,250 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
71.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.93
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
20.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
-6.800 -9.800
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-18.22 -1.91 -1.20 -6.080 -9.080
-22.18 -1.90 -1.20 -4.900 -7.900
0.20
0.11
0.00
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
66.185
65.943
65.837
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.2 63.3 61.6 55.5 64.764.1
56.3
56.9
54.8 48.4 46.9 55.655.3
55.4 46.4 47.7 56.156.0
Vehicle Noise:66.3 64.5 61.9 56.7 65.765.2
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
55.4 53.5 51.8 45.7 54.954.3
47.2
49.0
45.7 39.3 37.8 46.546.3
47.5 38.5 39.8 48.248.1
Vehicle Noise:56.8 55.0 52.2 47.2 56.355.8
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Madison Street
Scenario:First Floor With Wall
20,000
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,000 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
71.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):5.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-1.93
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
20.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
-6.800 -9.800
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-16.18 -1.91 -1.20 -6.080 -9.080
-20.13 -1.90 -1.20 -4.900 -7.900
0.20
0.11
0.00
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
66.185
65.943
65.837
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.3 65.4 63.6 57.6 66.866.2
58.3
58.9
56.8 50.5 48.9 57.657.4
57.5 48.5 49.7 58.258.1
Vehicle Noise:68.3 66.5 63.9 58.7 67.867.3
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
57.5 55.6 53.8 47.8 57.056.4
49.3
51.0
47.7 41.4 39.8 48.548.3
49.6 40.6 41.8 50.350.2
Vehicle Noise:58.9 57.1 54.2 49.3 58.357.8
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Avenue 58
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
12,500
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:1,250 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
71.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
-0.98
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
20.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-18.22 -2.14 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-22.18 -2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-0.51
-0.70
-1.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
68.780
68.350
67.607
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.0 63.1 61.3 55.3 64.563.9
56.1
56.7
54.6 48.2 46.6 55.355.1
55.3 46.2 47.5 56.055.8
Vehicle Noise:66.0 64.2 61.6 56.4 65.565.0
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
65.0 63.1 61.3 55.3 64.563.9
56.1
56.7
54.6 48.2 46.6 55.355.1
55.3 46.2 47.5 56.055.8
Vehicle Noise:66.0 64.2 61.6 56.4 65.565.0
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012
SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA
Project Name:The Wave
Job Number:12462
Analyst:B. LawsonLot No:Planning Area VIII-LDR
Road Name:Madison Street
Scenario:Second Floor With Wall
20,000
10%
51.0
NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
Peak Hour Percentage:
Peak Hour Volume:2,000 vehicles
Centerline Dist. to Barrier:
71.0Centerline Dist. to Observer:
Highway Data
feet
feet
vehicles
Road Elevation:0.0
Barrier Elevation:0.0
Pad Elevation:0.0
Site Data
Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15)
Medium Trucks (2 Axles):15
Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles):15
Autos:15
Vehicle Mix
feet
feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Barrier Height:6.0
Observer Height (Above Pad):14.0 feet
feet
45 mphVehicle Speed:
Near/Far Lane Distance:45 feet
REMEL Traffic Flow Distance
1.06
VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:77.5%12.9%9.6%97.42%
84.8%4.9%10.3%1.84%
86.5%2.7%10.8%0.74%
-2.18
Finite Road
-1.20
Barrier Atten
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
20.0Barrier Distance to Observer:feet
Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm):1.0
0.000 0.000
Fresnel Berm Atten
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType
-16.18 -2.14 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-20.13 -2.07 -1.20 0.000 0.000
-0.51
-0.70
-1.30
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:0.000
2.297
8.006
68.780
68.350
67.607
Grade Adjustment:0.0
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.1 63.4 57.3 66.565.9
58.1
58.7
56.6 50.2 48.7 57.457.1
57.3 48.3 49.5 58.057.9
Vehicle Noise:68.1 66.3 63.7 58.5 67.567.0
Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation)
Medium Trucks:
Heavy Trucks:
Autos:
VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night CNELLdn
67.0 65.1 63.4 57.3 66.565.9
58.1
58.7
56.6 50.2 48.7 57.457.1
57.3 48.3 49.5 58.057.9
Vehicle Noise:68.1 66.3 63.7 58.5 67.567.0
77.62
82.14
69.34
Road Grade:0.0%
feet
Monday, November 11, 2019
214
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
APPENDIX 10.1:
OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS
215
The Wave – Coral Mountain Noise Impact Analysis
12642-02 Noise Study
This page intentionally left blank
216
JN:12642 The Wave - Coral Mountain
The Wave ‐ Coral Mountain
CadnaA Noise Prediction Model
12642_06.cna
Date:
29.11.19
Analyst:
B. Lawson
Receiver Noise Levels
Name M.ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates
Ld Ln Lden Ld Ln Lden Type Auto Noise Type X Y Z
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
R1 1 36.3 36.3 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6559701.83 2172082.13 5.00
R2 2 38.4 38.4 45.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6561160.17 2172103.84 5.00
R3 3 36.1 36.1 42.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6561607.22 2172116.86 5.00
R4 4 35.8 35.8 42.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6561919.72 2171422.41 5.00
R5 5 36.2 36.2 42.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6561963.81 2170753.38 5.00
R6 6 46.8 46.8 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6561014.44 2167755.55 5.00
R7 7 45.1 45.1 51.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6560134.29 2166770.74 5.00
R8 8 44.7 44.7 51.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 11.00 a 6559827.00 2166505.11 11.00
R9 9 20.1 20.1 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6556013.28 2170127.57 5.00
R10 10 35.0 35.0 41.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 5.00 a 6557185.16 2172188.76 5.00
Area Source(s)
Name M.ID Result. PWL Result. PWL''Lw / Li Correction Sound Reduction Attenuation Operating Time K0
Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Evening Night R Area Day Special Night
(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)(ft²)(min)(min)(min)(dB
Surf Lagoon/Wave Machine AREASOURCE00001 109.3 109.3 109.3 60.3 60.3 60.3 Lw 109.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Outdoor Pool/Spa AREASOURCE00002 89.5 89.5 89.5 43.9 43.9 43.9 Lw 89.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Parking Lot AREASOURCE00003 84.6 84.6 84.6 51.0 51.0 51.0 Lw 84.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Outdoor Game AREASOURCE00004 78.0 78.0 78.0 27.9 27.9 27.9 Lw 78 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Neighborhood Commercial AREASOURCE00005 89.4 89.4 89.4 44.3 44.3 44.3 Lw 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Barrier(s)
Name M.ID Absorption Z‐Ext.Cantilever Height
left right horz.vert.Begin End
(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)
BARRIERS BARRIERS00001 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00002 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00003 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00004 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00005 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00006 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00007 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00008 6.00 a
BARRIERS BARRIERS00009 6.00 a
Urban Crossroads, Inc.217
JN:12642 Coral MountainSourcePartial Level LdNameM.IDR1R2R3R4R5R6R7R8R9R10Surf Lagoon/Wave Machine AREASOURCE0000135.734.233.634.435.546.745.044.619.934.8Outdoor Pool/Spa AREASOURCE0000216.715.815.216.317.728.925.224.80.714.5Parking Lot AREASOURCE0000314.211.610.611.111.818.613.515.6-0.312.9Outdoor Game AREASOURCE000046.36.86.58.510.920.213.510.3-12.62.1Neighborhood Commercial AREASOURCE0000526.536.332.430.127.019.416.413.5-2.016.6218