Loading...
BRES2015-0049 Revision 1,�ID Bin City of La Quinta �► Building 8L Safety Division Permit # 78-495 Calle Tampico BPEI La Quinta, CA 92253 - (760) 777-7012 ws7aTa, gild Building Permit Application and Tracking Sheet Project Address: 1501 U G & CJ dyl -C,,,_ Owner's Name: ! A. P. Number. _ 37D _ 00 Address: / q -83 S ¢v Legal Description: City, ST, Zip: Xl SOS %'f J 9 �a�d Contractor: n�e T" Telephone: hone: 7 o a 5?/ .................:............:::::::::::.::: Address: /y y S' Project Description: City, ST, Zip: / /� �-(/ 9 Z� �o v/� II Telephone: P ho e. y 7� 3 3 z. ...............................................: oc �- State Lie. # : City Lie. #.: W.A� 3 �I Arch., Engr., Designer: 3, /� �,� l�• Address: City, ST, Zip: Telephone: le one: P ::::::::::•:.: Construction TY aneY Pe: Occupancy: : State Lie. #• Project type (circle one): New Add'n Alter Repair Demo Name of Contact Person: Sq. Ft.: S4M�� # Stories: # Units: Telephone # of Contact Person: �(ov .Y85� (os a �imated Value of Project: APPLICANT: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE # Submittal Req'd Rec'd TRACKING PERMIT FEES Plan Sets Plan Check submitted Item Amount Structural Cates. Reviewed, ready ar corrections Plan Check Deposit Truss Calcs. Called Contact Pc on Plan Check Balance Title 24 Catcs. Plans picked up Construction Flood plain plan Plans resubmitted Mechanical Grading plan 2nd Review, ready for corrections/issue Electrical Subcontactor List Called Contact Person Plumbing Grant Deed Plans picked up S.M.I. H.O.A. Approval Plans resubmitted Grading IN IIOUSE:- '"! Review, ready for corrections/issue Developer Impact Fee Planning Approval Called Contact Person A.I.P.P. Pub. Wks. Appr Date of permit issue School Fees, Total Permit Fees Letter of Transmittal To: City of La Quinta Today's Date: 78-495 Calle Tampico City Due Date: La Quinta, CA 92253 Project Address: Attn: Kay Plan Check #: We are forwarding: Submittal: ❑ 1St ® 2nd ❑ 3rd 10-20-15 ® By Messenger ❑ By Mail (Fed Ex or UPS) Includes: # Of Descriptions: Copies: Includes: ❑ 10-20-15 52-599 Via Savona Structural Calculations BRES 2015-0049 ® ❑ 4th ❑ 5th ❑ Other: ® By Messenger ❑ By Mail (Fed Ex or UPS) Includes: # Of Descriptions: Copies: Includes: ❑ Structural Plans ❑ Structural Calculations ® 2 Truss Calculations Floor Eland Roof ❑ Soils Report ❑ ❑ • Structural Comment List ❑ ® 1 Redlined Structural Plans ❑ ❑ Redlined Structural Calcs ❑ ❑ Redlined Truss Calcs ❑ # Of Copies: 1 1 ❑ Your Pickup Descriptions: Revised Structural Plans Revised Struct. Calcs Revised Truss . Revised Soils Report Approved Structural Plans Approved Structural Calcs Approved Truss Calcs Approved Soils Report ❑ Redlined Soils Reports ❑ Other: Comments: Structural content is approvable, pending the following: The Engineer of Record shall issue a letter of review and approval to the Building official or affix a shop drawing stamp on the truss calculations stating reviewed and accepted. If you have any questions, please call. Time = 2.75 HR This Material Sent for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Your Review ❑ Checking Other: ❑ BY: Kathryn Samuels Palm Desert Office: ® (760) 772-5107 Other: ❑ ® Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ At the request of: OCT 2 0 2015 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT October 15, 2015 Andrew Pierce Corporation Gary Lohman 44-835 Deep Canyon Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: 52599 Via Savona, The Hideaway in La Quinta Subj-.: Opinion of Construction, lot 11-12C Dear Mr. Lohman, Visits were made to observe the work and determine if it had preceded in general conformance of the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office. Reports were provided to your firm detailing deviations from what the documents had intended and providing recommendations we had made to be implemented. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that the framing and shear walls with nailing of 4 inches on center and closer spacing on lot 11-12C constructed in general conformance with the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office. The content of this letter is understood to . be an expression of professional opinion by this engineer which is based on his/her best knowledge, information and belief. As such, it consists of neither a guarantee nor a warrantee expressed or implied. Very truly yours, Bokaie Engineering Solution. Mohammad Douroudian Director of Field Operation MD/60006 101512015 Opin of Const Distribution: (1) Addressee — email and mail (1) File 60006 Q N r ORMRajact 111'0. .SGV n iso Shoat Internatlonal Fib Xonob omu /W.0 bine _li?j,_117 STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION REPORT A visit to the project site was made on the above date to: :1 Address specific elements of the ware. P Assist the field personnel with complying with the intent of the construction documents. ❑ Assist the field personnel with complying with the findings from a previous structural job site observation R& n„ .... At the time of our visit, work had progressed to the point of, Phase Address: Building / Lot Number: 6;4:— — Building / Plan Type 6 Elevation _ Foundation Trenched O O Unforcemeht Placed �- Foundation Poured -:2- Wills Framed I. Floor Framed - ❑ Roof Framed 2— Floor Floor FII Placed a -- Roof Sheathing Covered ❑ Roofing .Materials Stacked and Loaded ❑ Insulation Installed n ' Exterior Walls Covered ❑ Interior wall Covered n MEP n Final Framing Pick -Lipa Completed O Building Completed ❑ O gas I e)i upon our. visit: -AWer to the attached field notes to be addressed by the construction personnel. 0 Additional information MII be sent from our office which will need to be addressed by the construction personnel. It is our opinion that this building Is being constructed in general conformance with the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office. Site Observation ceased, framing was not at a stage of completion in which site observation could be performed. :3 Concerns brought to the attention of field personnel based on previous site observation made on have yet to be addressed: Please rote: Our findings and recommendations may have other than structural ramifications which we have not addressed. Be advised that changes to the construction douunenta need approval of the building official. Our firm is not authorized to act as the Owner's agent. Our findings shall not be construed as authorizing the expenditure of additional funds. Site Observation was made only to determinegeneral conformance with the Intent of the construction documents. Observation was made of those portions of the work which would best represent the Intend of the documents, not each and every element of the work. Site observation did not include review, approval or observation of, among other items: 1. The comractorssafety precautions, procedures, designs, methods or techniques. 2. Any shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retaining of excavations, or any other erection methods or temporary bracing 3. Any sails at the site, their adequacy tosupport the building, expansiveness, or arty other soil related conditions. 4. Any drainage courses or devises Of temporary nature or as a penawaent part of the structure, Including roof and floor slopes. drains and pipes. The findings ;of this obseivotlon re understood to be an u cession of professional'opinuon by the engineer basedan his or her best knowledge, innfornoti a belief: su it eo of neither a guaantee nor a warra ntee expressed or Implied. Field Superintendent 'ate, Observer \ Date RI 1;/-h— ❑ ❑71 n ❑ ZI - n ❑ O O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D r ❑ ❑ ❑ - ❑ ci ❑ - ❑ ❑ ❑ C ❑ U ❑ C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ I:) n C. ❑ G o n ❑ O U gas I e)i upon our. visit: -AWer to the attached field notes to be addressed by the construction personnel. 0 Additional information MII be sent from our office which will need to be addressed by the construction personnel. It is our opinion that this building Is being constructed in general conformance with the intent of the construction documents prepared by our office. Site Observation ceased, framing was not at a stage of completion in which site observation could be performed. :3 Concerns brought to the attention of field personnel based on previous site observation made on have yet to be addressed: Please rote: Our findings and recommendations may have other than structural ramifications which we have not addressed. Be advised that changes to the construction douunenta need approval of the building official. Our firm is not authorized to act as the Owner's agent. Our findings shall not be construed as authorizing the expenditure of additional funds. Site Observation was made only to determinegeneral conformance with the Intent of the construction documents. Observation was made of those portions of the work which would best represent the Intend of the documents, not each and every element of the work. Site observation did not include review, approval or observation of, among other items: 1. The comractorssafety precautions, procedures, designs, methods or techniques. 2. Any shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retaining of excavations, or any other erection methods or temporary bracing 3. Any sails at the site, their adequacy tosupport the building, expansiveness, or arty other soil related conditions. 4. Any drainage courses or devises Of temporary nature or as a penawaent part of the structure, Including roof and floor slopes. drains and pipes. The findings ;of this obseivotlon re understood to be an u cession of professional'opinuon by the engineer basedan his or her best knowledge, innfornoti a belief: su it eo of neither a guaantee nor a warra ntee expressed or Implied. Field Superintendent 'ate, Observer \ Date RI 1;/-h— c r ?^ \ ` �Y Nom\ a O 1 �.� � � a� �v � r '— � ,` r � � �� MiTek' Re: Roof Masters Lot 11-12C52-599 Via Savona MiTek USA, Inc. 7777 Greenback Lane Suite 109 Citrus Heights, CA, 95610 Telephone 9161676-1900 Fax 916/676-1909 The truss drawing(s) referenced below have been prepared by MiTek USA, Inc. under my direct supervision based on the parameters provided by BMC -Indio, CA. Pages or sheets covered by this seal: R45255861 thru R45255862 My license renewal date for the state of California is December 31, 2015. Lumber design values are in accordance with ANSI/TPI 1 section 6.3 These truss designs rely on lumber values established by others. Q?,pFESS/pN SOON ��F2 c C 074486 c A EXP. 12-31-15 A IT �F v August 25,2015 Ong, Choo Soon The seal on these drawings indicate acceptance of professional engineering responsibility solely for the truss components shown. The suitability and use of this component for any particular building is the responsibility of the building designer, per ANSI/TPI 1.