CC Resolution 2021-031 Street Vacation - Madero & Tecate (Superseded)RESOLUTION NO. 2021 – 031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, VACATING A
1,267-SQUARE-FOOT PORTION OF THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENIDA MADERO AND
CALLE TECATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE
SANTA CARMELITA AT VALE LA QUINTA
SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 25
WHEREAS, this action is exempt under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301 Class 1(c); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8322 and 8323 of the Public Streets,
Highways and Service Easement Vacation Law, due notice of the Public Hearing
was given by public posting in the time and manner prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta has conducted the
required public hearing with due notice and, upon hearing and considering all
testimony of all interested parties, make the following findings:
1. Vacation of the subject 1,267-square-foot portion of the southwest corner
of Avenida Madero and Calle Tecate will not adversely affect the City of
La Quinta or adversely impact the Circulation Element of the City of La
Quinta General Plan.
2. The affected 1,267-square-foot portion of the southwest corner of
Avenida Madero and Calle Tecate is unnecessary for either present or
prospective public use or purposes, including use as a non-motorized
transportation facility.
3. No local agency has submitted objections to the street vacation proposal.
4. Approval and adoption of the proposed public street vacation will not
cause a significant negative impact upon the environment.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council, having elected to proceed under the
provisions of Chapter 3 of the Public Streets, Highways and Service Easement
Vacation Law of the State of California, and having held a public hearing upon
due notice as provided therein, hereby finds from all evidence submitted that
the 1,267-square-foot portion of the southwest corner of Avenida Madero and
Calle Tecate, specifically described in Exhibits A and B, is unnecessary for either
9{G0Go"
"u"2"oG`Y`>fG?Bo`>y"|`u;f"d`foG`Y`>"v9YG5"T&59f`09GY?"
d`foG`Y`>oDy9loB"Q>`>l92oG`Yo`z^lBGdl`qoBf"Y?99"lo
l"Y09g\"f5J^`0"l9"Y5Wg5G"Y2`sYo|`>fGv9flG59Q`2"o95J\oD
2Go|`>Q"eqG^o"T`f9d&foG2sQ&gQ|59l2gG095"l>`QQ`yl
09?G_YG^?"ooDl`qoD"lo2`kf`>Q`o0Q`2P `>sYGoY`
l"Zo" 2/QGo" "o u&Q9Q" eqNo"g92`g595G^0``P d"?9l
oE`q?B`>>G2G(Rg<2`g5l`>gGw9flG592`qYo|2&SG>`jG"
oDY29Y`foB9"lo&R`Y?oD9"lo9gQ|QG_;`>l"G5Q`o"
5Glo"Y29`> o`oDY`foD"lo2`j9f`>l"G5Q`o,l`09G^?oD
y:mo:i}h@Coa>y#}a>$x=[H5#U'8:fa#mmCaz^a\m#H8of#3o
T&d!
oDY29l`qoB 9"lo >99oo`"d`GYo`Y"Y`Yo"Y?9Yo2sfu9
2`Y2"v9 Y`foD"lo9fQ| B"uM? " f*5Gql `>
>99o o` yBG2B "
g&7G"Q09"fll`qoBy9lo
oD\4;naqoD"np;fQ~)Qa\Al"I74qfv;oFaqAB"49\of"Q)YAQ;a>
"5Glo-29`> >99oo`&]"Y?Q9d`G^o
oDY29l`qoB y9lo >99oo`"d`G\o`YoDl`roDgQ|fG?Bo
`>y"|`>"v9Y6"T&59f`"llB`y^`Yl+5of"2oT&d
oDZ29Y`foB y9lo"Q`Y?l"G5l`qoDgQ|fG?Bob>y"|c>
"v9YL"T&79f`"5Glo"Z29`>
>99oo`oDd`GYo`>1<?JY^G^?
l"G5&g9"2`Yo"GYl leq(f9>99oT`f9`fQ9ll
oBGl5`2tYoy"ldg9d(f950|
X`fs_59fV~5O;4pKa\
0"l95`Yg92`g5G_>`gT"oG`Y
.`T
T"?%YdQl
5"o:
5(62/87,2112
$'237(' $8*867
TSA
T
E F O RNIAOF C A L INo. 8232L YEV
R
USDNALDESNECI
ROEXHIBIT "B"5(62/87,2112
$'237(' $8*867