9607-047 (CSCS) Report of Testing & ObservationsREPORT OF TESTING & OBSERVATIONS
DURING GRADING
111 LA QUINTA CENTER
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
B7 -2083-P3
JUNE 18, 1992
d
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
Earth Systems Consultants
WSouthern California
June 18, 1992
Transpacific Development Company
2377 Crenshaw Boulevard
Torrance, California 90501-3325
Project: 111 La Quinta Center
La Quinta, California
Buena Engineers Division
79-811 B Country Club Drive
Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201
(619) 345-1588
(619) 328-9131
FAX (619) 345-7315
B7 -2083-P3
92-06-727
Subject: Report of Testing and Observations
Performed During Grading
Ref: Geotechnical Engineering Report by Buena Engineers, Inc. dated
January 17, 1990; Report No. 90-01-788
Interim Report of Testing & Observations during Grading by Earth
Systems Consultants dated April 13, 1992; Report No. 92-04-737
Submitted herewith is a report of testing and observations performed during
the rough grading on the above referenced project. Grading operations
were performed by James Rue Construction using conventional heavy
equipment. Testing was performed as per authorization of Colm Macken.
Test results are presented on the attached test report sheet with their estimated
locations plotted on the accompanying. plan. Compaction tests were
performed. in accordance with ASTM D 2922-81 Method A or B and ASTM D 3017-
88 Nuclear Density Test Procedures.
Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture were determined in the laboratory in
accordance with ASTM D 1557-78, Method A
Test results are as follows:
Soil Description USSCS Maximum Density -Optimum Moisture
Grey brown very fine to
fine sand S P 106.3 pcf 14.4°
Brown slightly clayey
silty very fine to fine sand SM 115.7 pcf 11.7%
Brown clayey very silty
very fine sand SM 118.8 pcf 11.90/0
June 18,1992 -2- B7 -2083-P3
92-06-727
DISCUSSION:
I. The project is located on the north side of Highway 111 between Adams
Street and Washington Street in the City of La Quinta, California.
2. Prior to grading, the site consisted of vacant land with scattered desert
brush, short grass, weeds and debris. A building was removed prior to
grading.
3. The proposed development will include a large commercial complex.
4. The scope of our work was based on plans and staking by Hall and
Foreman.
5. The project area was cleared of vegetation and debris prior to the start of
grading operations.
6. Building areas adjacent to the Whitewater channel were excavated to
depth of approximately ten (10) feet below pad grade. An additional
twelve (12) inches were scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted.
7. The remaining building areas were excavated to a depth of five (5) feet
below pad grade. An additional twelve (12) inches were scarified,
moisture conditioned and compacted.
8. Soils previously removed from the building. areas were replaced in thin lifts
and compacted in place. Then fill materials consisting of onsite soils were
placed in thin layers and compacted into place.
9. The pads were overexcavated a minimum of five (5) feet beyond the
building limits or more in most instances. The approximate limits of the
overexcavations are indicated on the plans.
10. The building locations indicated in this report are as designated on the site
grading plan and may vary from those indicated on the architects master
plan.
11. A total of two hundred three (203) compaction tests are reported herein.
The initial three hundred seven (307) tests are reported in the referenced
interim report.
12. Test results indicate that a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum
density has been obtained in the areas tested. .
13. The test locations are approximate and were determined by pacing and
sighting from prominent field features. In our work, we have relied on
topographic and survey information provided by others.
14. Based upon observations and testing during the grading operations, from
April 14, 1992 through May 20, 1992, on this project, it is our opinion that the
intent. of the recommendations of the referenced Geotechnical
Engineering Report as well as the ordinances of the City of La Quinta,
California have been met.
June 18, 1992
-3-
B7-2083-P3
92-06-727
15. As used herein, the term 'observation' implies only that we observed the
progress of work we agreed to be involved with, and performed tests on
which together we based our opinion as to whether the work essentially
complies with the job requirements.
16. With any manufactured product there are statistical variations in its
uniformity and in the accuracy of tests used to measure its quality. As
compared with other manufactured products, field construction usually
presents large statistical variations in its uniformity and accuracy of test
results used to measure its quality. Thus, even with very careful observation
and testing, it cannot be said that all parts of the product comply with the
job requirements and the degree of certainty is greater with full-time
observation than it is with intermittent observations and testing. Therefore,
our opinion, based on observing and testing the work means that there is
only a statistically based, reasonable certainty, that the work essentially
complies with the job requirements.
17. We make no warranty, express or implied, except that our services were
performed in accordance with engineering principles generally
accepted at this time and location.
18. It is recommended that Earth Systems Consultants be provided the
opportunity for a general review of any changes to the final design
and/or location of the proposed structures in order that earthwork and
foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted. If Earth
Systems Consultants is not accorded the privilege of making this
recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for
misinterpretation of our recommendations.
19. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the
owner, or of his representative, to insure that the information and
recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the
architect and engineers for the project and are incorporated into the
plans and specifications for the project. It is also the owners responsibility,
or his representative, to insure that the necessary steps are taken to see
that the general contractor and all subcontractors carry out such
recommendations in the field. It is further understood that the owner or his
representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate
governing agencies.
If there are any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Respectfully submitted,
E TH SYSTEMS CO L .NTS
0
Kurt A. Roth
Field Technician
Reviewed and Ap
0�
Brett L. nderson,
pc/GRADING
Copies: 4 - Transpacific Development Company
PAPT14 SVCTFAAc MIJCI 11 TAMTC
- VTA File
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB NO: B7 -2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT NO: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description- Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
308
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.0
9.4
109.6
94
115.7
309
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.0
10.1
111.8
96
115.7
310
04-14-92
Per Plan 72.0
8.6
112.4
97
115.7
311
04-14-92
Per Plan 72.0
7.0
110.2
95
115.7
312
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.5
7.9
107.2
92
115.7
313
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.5
6.6
108.9
94
115.7
314
04-14-92
Per Plan 72.5
6.4
113.8
98
115.7
315
04-14-92.
Per Plan 72.5
5.8
111.6
96
115.7
316
04-14-92
Per Plan 67.0
9.2
107.7
93
115.7
317
04-14-92
Per Plan 67.0
8.7
109.1
94
115.7
318
04-14-92
Per Plan 68.0
7.5
110.1
95
115.7
319
04-14-92
Per Plan 68.0
6.6
114.2
98
115.7
320
04-14-92
Per Plan 69.0
8.6
112.9
97
115.7
321
04-14-92
Per Plan 69.0
9.2
111.2
96
115.7
322
04-14-92
Per Plan 70.0
7.9
111.4
96
115.7
323
04-14-92
Per Plan 70.0
7.1
109.6
94
115.7
324
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.0
6.5
110.0
95
115.7
325
04-14-92
Per Plan 71.0
6.3
112.3
97
115.7
326
04-14-92
Per Plan 72.0
8.8
107.9
93
115.7
327
04-14-92
Per Plan 72.0
9.3
109.1
94
115.7
328
04-15-92
Per Plan 73.5
11.7
108.3
94
115.7
329
04-15-92
Per Plan 73.0
10.3
105.2
91
115.7
330
04-15-92
Per Plan 72.5
7.0
104.9
91
115.7
331
04-15-92
Per Plan 72.5
8.4
106.2
92
115.7
332
04-15-92
Per Plan 74.0
6.7
109.6
95
115.7
333
04-15-92
Per Plan 73.5
8.1
108.9
94
115.7
334
04-15-92
Per Plan 73.0
10.1
112.9
97
115.7
335
04-15-92
Per Plan 73.0
12.1
111.5
96
115.7
336
04-15-92
Per Plan 72.5
11.4
110.4
95
115.7
337
04-16-92
Per Plan 66.0
10.1
111.5
96
115.7
338
04-16-92
Per Plan 65.0
12.1
110.5
95
115.7
339
04-16-92
Per Plan 66.0
7.1
108.4
94
115.7
340
04-16-92
Per Plan 67.0
13.2
104.9
91
115.7
341
04-16-92
Per Plan 67.5
9.6
104.1
90
115.7
342
04-16-92
Per Plan 68.0
7.9
106.2
92
115.7
DATE: June 18, 1992
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB NO: B7 -2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT NO: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
Pad #
343
04-16-92
Per Plan 68.0
7.4
106.0
92
115.7
344
04-16-92
Per Plan 68.0
8.2
107.1
92
115.7
345
04-16-92
Per Plan M-1 79.2
9.4
109.9
95
115.7
346
04-16-92
Per Plan M-1 79.2
10.1
110.6
96
115.7
347
04-16-92
Per Plan 69.5
8.0
108.2
93
115.7
348
04-16-92
Per Plan 69.5
7.2
107.1
92
115.7
349
04-16-92
Per Plan 69.0
9.1
109.4
94
115.7
350
04-16-92
Per Plan 69.0
8.7
108.5
94
115.7
351
04-17-92
Per Plan 70.5
7.6
109.0
94
115.7
352
04-17-92
Per Plan 70.5
9.0
107.9
93
115.7
353
04-17-92
Per Plan 71.5
6.5
113.0
97
115.7
354
04-17-92
Per Plan 71.5
8.4
109.9
95
115.7
355
04-17-92
Per Plan 70.0
10.1
109.8
95
115.7
356
04-17-92
Per Plan 70.0
7.3
108.9
94
115.7
357
04-17-92
Per Plan 71.0
6.8
113.8
98
115.7
358
04-17-92
Per Plan 71.0
8.8
112.7
97
115.7
359
04-17-92
Per Plan 63.0
9.2
105.8
91
115.7
360
04-17-92
Per Plan 63.0
9.9
104.8
90
115.7
361
04-17-92
Per Plan 64.0
6.9
111.8
96
115.7
362
04-17-92
Per Plan 64.0
8.5
112.4
97
115.7
363
04-17-92
Per Plan 65.0
9.5
109.6
94
115.7
364
04-17-92
Per Plan 65.0
7.7
107.7
93
115.7
365
04-17-92
Per Plan L-1 73.0
6.1
114.1
98
115.7
366
04-17-92
Per Plan K-1 73.0
5.6
115.3
99
115.7
367
04-17-92
Per Plan J-1 73.5
6.8
113.8
98
115.7
368
04-17-92
Per Plan M -C Loading Dock 66.5
10.6
108.9
94
115.7
369
04-17-92
Per Plan 68.0
11.1
110.8
95
115.7
370
04-17-92
Per Plan 69.5
9.4
110.5
95
115.7
371
04-17-92
Per Plan 71.5
10.0
107.6
93
115.7
372
04-20-92
Per Plan 66.0
9.8
111.8
96
115.7
373
04-20-92
Per Plan 66.0
10.2
113.5
98
115.7
374
04-20-92
Per Plan 67.0
10.8
110.4
95
115.7
375
04-20-92
Per Plan 67.0
11.4
115.2
99
115.7
376
04-20-92
Per Plan 72.5
9.5
111.8
96
115.7
377
04-20-92
Per Plan 72.5
9.1
114.2
98
115.7
DATE: June 18, 1992
-2-
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
r
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB. NO: B7 -2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT NO: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
Pad #
378
04-20-92
Per Plan 72.0
8.7
112.6
97
115.7
379
04-20-92
Per Plan 72.0
11.2
115.2
99
115.7
380
04-20-92
Per Plan 68.0
10.4
112.0
96
115.7
381.
04-20-92
Per Plan 68.0
9.6
112.4
97
115.7
382
04-21-92
Per Plan 72.5
7.4
114.1
98
115.7 .
383
04-21-92
Per Plan 72.5
10.9
114.8
99
115.7
384
04-21-92
Per Plan 69.0
8.7
112.3
97
115.7
385
04-21-92
Per Plan 69.0
9.8
112.6
97
115.7
386
04-21-92
Per Plan 70.0
10.4
113.5
98
115.7
387
04-21-92
Per Plan 70.0
7.9
111.6
96
115.7
388
04-21-92
Per Plan 69.0
9.4
112.6
97
115.7
389
04-21-92
Per Plan 69.0
10.1
114.9
99
115.7
390
04-21-92
Per Plan 70.0
8.6
111.2
96
115.7
391
04-21-92
Per Plan 70.0
7.6
110.4
95
115.7
392
04-22-92
Per Plan 73.5
10.4
110.4
95
115.7
393
04-22-92
Per Plan 73.5
9.2
108.3
93
115.7
394
04-22-92
Per Plan 73.0
8.5
111.8
96
115.7
395
04-22-92
Per Plan 73.0
8.0
109.5
94
115.7
396
04-22-92
Per Plan 71.0
9.4
114.3
98
115.7
397
04-22-92
Per Plan 71.0
7.6
111.5
96
115.7
398
04-22-92
Per Plan 72.0
7.1
115.3
99
115.7
399
04-22-92
Per Plan 72.0
6.6
112.6
97
115.7
400
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 63.0
10.3
106.4
92
115.7
401
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 64.0
9.8
109.6
94
115.7
402
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 65.0
8.1
110.8
95
115.7
403
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 66.0
7.5
108.9
94
115.7
404
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 67.0
9.7
111.3
96
115.7
405
04-22-92
Per Plan MB 68.0
10.6
111.4
96
115.7
406
04-23-92
Per Plan MC 72.5
8.7
111.8
96
115.7
407
04-23-92
Per Plan MC 72.5
7.1
113.8
98
115.7
408
04-23-92
Per Plan MC 72.5
7.8
111.6
96
115.7
409
04-23-92
Per Plan MC 72.5
6.4
110.4
95
115.7
410
04-23-92
Per Plan 72.8
7.9
114.2
98
115.7
411
04-23-92
Per Plan 72.8.
8.8
112.4
97
115.7
DATE: June 18, 1992
v
-3-
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
MI.=
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB NO: B7 -2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT NO: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
Pad #
412
04-23-92
Per Plan 73.0
9.2
112.6
97
115.7
413
04-23-92
Per Plan 75.7
7.3
110.4
95
115.7
414
04-23-92
Per Plan 74.7
9.7
112.5
97
115.7
415
04-23-92
Per Plan 74.7
8.6
113.5
98
115.7
416
04-23-92
Per Plan 74.7
10.1
113.9
98
115.7
417
04-23-92
Per Plan 74.7
9.1
114.1
98
115.7
418
04-23-92
Per Plan 74.2
10.6
111.2
96
115.7
419
04-23-92
Per Plan MB 69.0
8.8
109.5
94
115.7
420
.04-23-92
Per Plan MB 70.0
7.6
110.2
95
115.7
421
04-23-92
Per Plan MB 71.0
9.4
110.7
95
115.7
422
04-23-92
Per Plan MB 72.0
8.4
111.2
96
115.7
423
04-24-92
Per Plan HI 73.8
6.6
112.8
97
115.7
424
04-24-92
Per Plan HI 73.8
7.2
111.4
96
115.7
425
04-24-92
Per Plan HIC 73.8
6.6
113.9
98
115.7
426
04-24-92
Per Plan HIC 73.8
5.7
111.0
96
115.7
427
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.5
8.3
110.0
95
115.7
428
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.5
7.7
110.6
95
115.7
429
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.5
9.2
113.0
97
115.7
430
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.5
8.1
111.2
96
115.7
431
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.0
7.9
112.5
97
115.7
432
04-24-92
Per Plan 73.0
7.4
113.9
98
115.7
433
04-27-92
Per Plan MB 73.0
7.2
113.5
98
115.7,
434
04-27-92
Per Plan MB 73.0
6.1
113.1
97
115.7
435
04-27-92
Per Plan MB 73.0
6.6
110.6
95
115.7
436-
04-27-92
Per Plan MB 73.0
7.4
112.4
97
115.7
437
04-28-92
Per Plan H3 71.0
8.0
102.3
96
106.3
438
04-28-92
Per Plan H3 71.0
8.3
100.1
94
106.3
439
04-28-92
Per Plan G3 71.5
6.2
114.2
98
115.7
440
04-28-92
Per Plan H3 72.0
6.7
102.3.
96
106.3
441
04-28-92
Per Plan 72.0
7.1
99.5
93
106.3
442
04-28-92
Per Plan G3 72.5
5.8
110.1
95
115.7
443
04-28-92
Per Plan H3 73.0
8.7
98.1
92
106.3
444
04-28-92
Per Plan G3 73.5
5.2
100.5
94
106.3
DATE: June 18, 1992
ME
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
• REPORT OF RELATIVE - COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB NO: B7 -2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT N0: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
Pad #
445
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 70.0
6.9
108.3
93
115.7
446
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 70.0
6.3
105.4
91
115.7
447
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 71.0
7.8
109.5
94
115.7
448
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 71.0
9.1
112.4
97
115.7
449
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 72.0
8.4
109.9
95
115.7
450
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 72.0
7.3
108.3
93
115.7
451
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 73.0
6.6
109.6
94
115.7
452
05-12-92
Per Plan C3 73.0
8.7
111.9
96
115.7
453
05-13-92
Per Plan C3 74.0
6.2
106.8
95
115.7
454
05-13-92
Per Plan C3 74.0
7.6
109.1
97
115.7
455
05-13-92
Per Plan E3 70.5
6.4
107.2
92
115.7
456
05-13-92
Per Plan 70.5
9.5
105.7
91
115.7
457
05-13-92
Per Plan E3 71.5
7.3
109.7
94
115.7
458
05-13-92
Per Plan 71.5
8.3
108.2
93
115.7
459
05-13-92
Per Plan E3 72.5
8.7
109.6
94
115.7
460
05-13-92
Per Plan 72.5
9.1
108.7
94
115.7
461
05-14-92
Per Plan H3 74.0
6.4
107.8
93
115.7
462
05-14-92
Per Plan 74.0
7.1
110.2
95
115.7
463
05-14-92
Per Plan H3 75.0
8.5
109.5
94
115.7
464
05-14-92
Per Plan 75.0
6.1
106.8
92
115.7
465
05-14-92
Per Plan G3 74.5
5.8
110.4
95
115.7
466
05-14-92
Per Plan G3 75.5
7.2
111.8
96
115.7
467
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 71.0
6.8
107.7
93
115.7
468
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 71.0
7.9
111.7
96
115.7
469
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 72.0
8.6
109.5
94
115.7
470
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 73.0
7.1
110.8
95
115.7
471
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 73.0
7.4
109.0
94
115.7
472
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 74.0
8.6
111.4
96
115.7
473
05-14-92
Per Plan E3 73.5
6.7
110.4
95
115.7
474
05-14-92
Per Plan 73.5
5.6
108.9
94
115.7
475
05-14-92
Per Plan E3 74.5
8.3
113.0
97
115.7
476
05-14-92
Per Plan 74.5
9.4
113.6
98
115.7
477
05-14-92
Per Plan F3 75.0
8.5
111.2
96
115.7
478
05-14-92
Per Plan 75.0
10.3
112.4
97
115.7
DATE: June 18, 1992
-5-
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
REPORT OF RELATIVE COMPACTIONS
JOB NAME: 111 La Quinta Center JOB NO: 137-2083-P3
LOCATION: La Quinta, California
REPORT NO: 92-06-727
Test No.
Date Tested
Description Elevation
%Moisture
Dry Density
Relative
Maximum
In Place
In Place
Compaction
Density
Pad #
479
05-15-92
Per Plan E3 70.5
9.4
111.7
96
115.7
480
05-15-92
Per Plan 71.5
8.7
112.7
97
115.7
481
05-15-92
Per Plan F3 71.0
11.3
110.2
95
115.7
482
05-15-92
Per Plan 72.0
10.6
108.3
93
115.7
483
05-15-92
Per Plan F-3 72.5
9.2
110.1
95
115.7
484
05-15-92
Per Plan 73.5
9.8
108.8
94
115.7
485
05-15-92
Per Plan G3 71.5
8.5
114.3
98
115.7
486
05-15-92
Per Plan 72.5
8.0
112.0
96
115.7
487
05-15-92
Per Plan F-3 73.0
9.9
108.7
94
115.7
488
05-15-92
Per Plan 74.0
8.9
113.0
97
115.7
489
05-15-92
Per Plan G3 73.5
9.8
110.2
95
115.7
490
05-15-92
Per Plan 74.5
9.3
109.7
94
115.7
491
05-15-92
Per Plan H3 71.0
10.7
113.8
98
115.7
492
05-15-92
Per Plan 72.0
8.8
111.6
96
115.7
493
05-15-92
Per Plan H-3 73.0
9.0
110.1
95
115.7
494
05-15-92
Per Plan 74.0
10.3
112.8
97
115.7
495
05-20-92
Per Plan C3 75.0
6.6
111.4
96
115.7
496
05-20-92
Per Plan E3 75.5
5.7
113.6
98
115.7
497
05-20-92
Per Plan 77.0
7.1
112.4
97
115.7
498
05-20-92
Per Plan F3 76.0
7.8
111.3
96
115.7
499
05-20-92
Per Plan 76.0
6.4
114.9
99
115.7
500
05-20-92
Per Plan G3 76.5
6.1
113.5
98
115.7
501
05-20-92
Per Plan 76.0
5.8
110.2
95
115.7
502
05-20-92
Per Plan H3 76.0
6.7
111.2
96
115.7
503
05-21-92
Per Plan K2 74.0
8.6
109.5
94
115.7
504
05-21-92
Per Plan J2 74.0
7.1
111.4
96
115.7
505
05-21-92
Per Plan 74.0
5.9
110.8
95
115.7
506
05-21-92
Per Plan H2 74.5
8.4
112.0
96
115.7
507
05-21-92
Per Plan 75.0
6.6
112.4
97
115.7
508
05-21-92
Per Plan G2 74.5
7.4
110.7
95
115.7
509
05-21-92
Per Plan 75.0
5.7
111.8
96
115.7
510
05-21-92
Per Plan F2 76.0
6.9
112.6
97
115.7
DATE: June 18, 1992
-6-
EARTH SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS
.71 t.F
-4 7
6
VE- c- �EXC A VA TJ ON w
�
2 '�n��!®as ■®o■ ■■®■■■■■■ew■■s
111 - - - -
SHEET NO. 6A 7H 111 LA QUINTA CENTER
t
LA QUINTA, CA.
BUENA ENGINEERS, INC. 1
Dare: 6 — 19 — 92 JOB NO.B7.2083•P3