Loading...
BRES2017-0192 - 2ND REVIEW STRUCTURAL CORRECTIONS9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, California 92123 (858) 560-1468 Fax (858) 560-1576 ===============EsG il Corporation=============== In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE:10/9/17 APPLICANT JURIS. JURISDICTION:La Quinta PLAN REVIEWER FILE PLAN CHECK NO.:BRES2017-0192 SET:II PROJECT ADDRESS:80957 Via Pressaro PROJECT NAME:Structural Only Plan Check for Hicks Custom SFR The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction’s codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Es Gil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant’s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant’s copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:Telephone #: Date contacted:(by:) Email: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By:Tamara Fischer Enclosures: EsGil Corporation GA EJ MB PC 10/2/17 La Quinta BRES2017-0192 10/9/17 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of th e items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence.The notes in bold font are current. . THIS IS A STRUCTURAL-ONLY PLAN CHECK 1.Please make all corrections and submit two new complete sets of prints, to: The jurisdiction's building department. 2.Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calc ulations. (California Business and Professions Code).Current structural is sealed and signed. To be re-verified on the final set. 5.Provide detailing on the plans to show veneer attachment to the stud walls, in accordance with the provisions of Section R703.7.Response indicated adhered veneer less than 15 psf and referenced the architectural plans for type and ICC approval. The architectural plans do not indicate an ICC approval or a maximum of 15 psf. Please provide an ICC approval or show that the plaster is adequate to support the stones with no additional reinforcing or support at the foundation. Please note that there are some larger stones shown, especially at the top.See detail 11/A6.3 and elevations on sheet A2.2. 9.Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans.The City of La Quinta does not allow deferred submittals.Please compare trusses to framing plan on sheet S-2. I found the following inconsistencies: a)Some of the trusses are not designed for the drag load per keynotes 4 or 5 on sheet S-2. For example: QGT, NA-GT, truss over powder room, etc. b)The lengths of G and F trusses do not match S -2. 11.Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a “review” stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). CBC Section 107.3.4.1.Please re-review trusses for correct loading and configuration (see #9 above).Also, ensure drag loads are applied as intended. It appears that for some of the trusses, the 200 plf is added only for the length of the shear wall.Please be sure the “reviewed” box is checked on the review stamp once this is done. La Quinta BRES2017-0192 10/9/17 MISCELLANEOUS 15.To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 16.Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes No  17.The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at EsGil Corporation. Thank you.