2021-09-03 DESIGN REVIEW LETTER
1
September 3, 2021
Mark Rogers
TRG Land
898 Production Pl
Newport Beach, CA 92663
mrogers@trgland.com
SUBJECT: 6th DESIGN REVIEW – EA TECHNICAL STUDIES, GPA AND ZC
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT—GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
2017-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008, ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT 2017-0008
Dear Mr. Rogers:
During April through July 2021, we received a number of resubmittals for the GPA case, ZC
case and EA case including GPA and ZC supporting documents, technical studies for the EIR
including the Addendum to the Supplemental Cultural Resources Technical Report,
Supplemental Paleontological Resources Assessment, Master Drainage Plan, LESA Report,
EDR Report, Biological Technical Report, Traffic Impact Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) Study. The City has reviewed these documents and comments are summarized
herein.
GPA and ZC Documentation
Comments on the GPA and ZC supporting documents are found within each document and
have been uploaded to eTrakit in each case as follows:
• 4TH REVIEW CORRECTIONS GPA 8-10-2021
• 3RD REVIEW CORRECTIONS - ZC 08-10-2021
EA Technical Studies
These reports have been reviewed by City staff and peer reviewer and comments are noted
in each document, available to download from the eTrakit portal. Some comments are also
summarized below. Please note, the Air Quality Impact Analysis, Greenhouse Gas Analysis,
Noise Impact Analysis have not been resubmitted to date. There are no further comments
on the LESA Report.
2
Documents uploaded to EA2017-0008 case:
• 4TH REVIEW COMMENTS - CR 8-2021 (Addendum to the Supplemental Cultural
Resources Technical Report)
• 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS – PALEO 8-2021
• 4TH REVIEW COMMENTS - CR PALEO RTC 8-2021
• 5TH REVIEW COMMENTS BIO 8-2021
• 6TH REVIEW COMMENTS – TIA 8-2021
• 6TH REVIEW COMMENTS - TIA LU REVIEW 8-2021
• 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS – VMT 8-2021
• 3RD REVIEW COMMENTS – HYDRO 8-2021
Additional Comments:
3RD REVIEW COMMENTS – HYDRO 8-2021
Provide more detail on the levees and their effect on on-site conservation lands and on
adjoining BLM and/or BOR lands, for instance:
• Extent and result of off-site grading on west side
• Extent and result of on-site levee and grading on west side of project
• Height of future west side levee and slope armoring
• Depth of armored levee toe-down
• How 90° turn into Guadalupe Channel is to be accomplished
We are aware that you are working with BLM on this and will summarize results in the
appropriate studies.
EDR REPORT
Please include the offsite well site and substation location area cited in the Cultural reports
in the EDR report.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 777-7067.
Sincerely,
Cheri L. Flores
Planning Manager
Design and Development Department
cc. Lou Miramontes, Hofmann Land Development
Danny Castro, Design and Development Director
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
4TH REVIEW CORRECTIONS GPA 8-10-2021
Main document changes and comments
Page 1: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:16:00 PM
Proposed General Plan
Page 1: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:17:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 14 pt, Bold, Italic
Page 1: Commented [CF1] Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 5:02:00 PM
Review comments on these exhibits in SP and apply those comments here.
Page 1: Commented [JS2R1] JoAnne Sturges 2/25/2021 10:30:00 AM
ok
Page 1: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:17:00 PM
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
City of La Quinta - Existing General Plan
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 1: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:17:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 14 pt, Bold, Italic
Page 3: Deleted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:13:00 PM
Page 3: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:13:00 PM
Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width)
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:02:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:40:00 AM
contrivance
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:40:00 AM
convey
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:32:00 AM
The removal of Jefferson Street as General Plan roadway south of the hypothetical westerly
extension of Avenue 60 to a private gated road.
The removal of Avenue 62 west of the hypothetical southerly extension of Madison Street.
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 4:58:00 PM
south of
1.
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 5:03:00 PM
1.
The realignment of the Jefferson Street extension on the General Plan Circulation Plan to be consistent
with the alignment proposed in the Travertine Development.
1.
Page 3: Formatted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 5:03:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.32", Hanging: 0.25", Right: 0", Space Before: 0 pt, No bullets or numbering, Tab stops: Not
at 0.63"
Page 3: Commented [CF3] Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:01:00 PM
Need to include exhibits showing this.
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 4:58:00 PM
.
1.
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 4:58:00 PM
,
1.
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 11:13:00 AM
Major Community Facilities;
1.
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 4:58:00 PM
T
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
1.
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 2/1/2021 4:58:00 PM
t
1.
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:46:00 PM
Justified
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
,
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
an
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
a
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
, Tentative Tract Map, Development Agreement
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
Page 3: Commented [CF4] Cheri Flores 1/18/2021 6:05:00 PM
We still need this application, please submit ASAP
Page 3: Commented [JS5R4] JoAnne Sturges 2/25/2021 11:02:00 AM
ok
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:41:00 PM
Amendment
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:16:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:44:00 AM
high quality
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:44:00 AM
high-quality
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:16:00 PM
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:16:00 PM
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:16:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.57", No bullets or numbering
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:45:00 AM
s
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 4: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:44:00 PM
, and
Page 4: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 3:44:00 PM
.
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:46:00 AM
All residential development has
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:46:00 AM
On-street bike lanes will make it convenient to ride around the project for exercise and local
transportation. A Class II bikeway will be constructed on the Jefferson Street for the use and
enjoyment of Travertine residents.
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 4: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:26:00 PM
gated
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:48:00 AM
As stated above, nd amendment to the General Plan will be required to delete the gated portion of
Jefferson Street within the project, and the deletion of Avenue 62 west of the hypothetical southerly
extension of Madison Street, and the termination of Madison Street south of Avenue 62.
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:07:00 PM
380
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:07:00 PM
358
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:33:00 PM
private and public
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:54:00 AM
s
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:34:00 PM
Justified, Indent: Left: 0.57"
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:45:00 PM
6
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 12:51:00 PM
2
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:22:00 PM
acres
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:22:00 PM
miles
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 12:52:00 PM
that circumnavigate the project for visitors and residents
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:45:00 PM
5 miles of trails interior to the project
Page 5: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 1:58:00 PM
Highlight
Page 5: Commented [CF6] Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:04:00 PM
Are there 11 miles total or only 6 with 5 inside the project?
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:46:00 PM
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
,
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:08:00 PM
153
Page 5: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:46:00 PM
60
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:08:00 PM
60
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 12:53:00 PM
57
Page 5: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:46:00 PM
57
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 12:54:00 PM
55.9
Page 5: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:47:00 PM
recreational
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:34:00 PM
Page 5: Moved from page 5 (Move #1) JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:09:00 PM
/ golfrecreational, 301 acres of natural open space 162 acres of restricted open space,
64 acres of recreational open space, with a resort and spa that will offer various
recreational activities. All residential development has access to pedestrian
walkways, providing a walkable community for the residents. On-street bike lanes will
make it convenient to ride around the project for exercise and local transportation. A
Class II bikeway will be constructed on the Jefferson Street for the use and enjoyment
of La Quinta residents
Page 5: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:47:00 PM
/
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:11:00 PM
golf
Page 5: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:47:00 PM
recreational
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:11:00 PM
recreational
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:10:00 PM
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:09:00 PM
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:08:00 PM
301 acres of natural open space
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 5: Commented [CF7] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:59:00 PM
This doesn’t match the land use table above. Please reconcile. Also, are the neighborhood parks and trails included in
the open space total of 358 acres?
Page 5: Commented [JS8R7] JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 12:56:00 PM
Reconciled (there is 1.25 acres of trail with in the natural open space area.
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:08:00 PM
162 acres of restricted open space, 64 acres of recreational open space,
Page 5: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:29:00 PM
All residential development has access to pedestrian walkways, providing a walkable
community for the residents. On-street bike lanes will make it convenient to ride
around the project for exercise and local transportation. A Class II bikeway will be
constructed on the Jefferson Street for the use and enjoyment of La Quinta residents
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 12:43:00 PM
Page 5: Moved to page 5 (Move #1) JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:09:00 PM
/ golf, 162 acres of restricted open space, 64 acres of recreational open space, with a
resort and spa that will offer various recreational activities.
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 6: Deleted Cheri Flores 1/20/2021 10:52:00 AM
GOAL H-2
Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and
moderate-income households.
Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan is designed to provide a range of housing types and
densities at varying price points that will help meet the anticipated demand for housing
within different economic segments of the City.
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:22:00 PM
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:13:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 11:25:00 AM
Page 6: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 11:26:00 AM
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Justified, Indent: Left: 0.57"
Page 6: Deleted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 1:59:00 PM
Page 6: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
r
Page 6: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 1:59:00 PM
Justified
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Justified
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.57", Right: 0.11"
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:17:00 PM
r
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 9:59:00 AM
if necessary
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/22/2021 11:00:00 AM
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:00:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:13:00 PM
52
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:13:00 PM
63
Page 7: Commented [CF9] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:32:00 PM
ZC Statement shows 152 acres. Please correct to make both statements consistent.
Page 7: Commented [JS10R9] JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:13:00 PM
That acreage included the southern parcel. No longer in play.
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:16:00 PM
restricted open space along
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:16:00 PM
protected habitat area along
Page 7: Commented [CF11] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 5:00:00 PM
Mention how much is for habitat here since we are talking about protecting habitat. So maybe refer to the amount of
open space being used for habitat rather than calling it restricted open space.
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:01:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 7: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:33:00 PM
with
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:24:00 AM
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
We have satisfied all AB 52 consultation and have redesigned our
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:27:00 AM
The
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:27:00 AM
has been redesigned
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:19:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/10/2021 1:28:00 PM
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:19:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:11:00 PM
163
Page 7: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:00:00 PM
Highlight
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 1:19:00 PM
152
Page 7: Commented [CF12] Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:05:00 PM
Should these numbers be flipped or is this right? I thought there was more in habitat to be preserved.
Page 7: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:00:00 PM
Highlight
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:11:00 PM
64
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/4/2021 2:04:00 PM
206
Page 7: Commented [CF13] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:35:00 PM
Above in BIO-1, 163 acres is listed. The ZC Statement shows 152 acres for habitat and 84 acres for recreational. Please
correct to make consistent.
Also the land use table above says that there are 206 acres recreational.
Page 7: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:00:00 PM
Highlight
Page 7: Commented [JS14R13] JoAnne Sturges 3/5/2021 11:38:00 AM
revised
Page 7: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:00:00 PM
Highlight
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:19:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/13/2020 12:55:00 PM
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:30:00 PM
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:22:00 PM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:19:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:19:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:20:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.07"
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:14:00 PM
larger areas related to the Middle North and Middle South storm flows
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:12:00 PM
xxx
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:51:00 PM
to
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:20:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/13/2020 12:55:00 PM
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:22:00 PM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:24:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:22:00 PM
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:21:00 PM
S
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:21:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:21:00 PM
S
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:21:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/13/2020 12:55:00 PM
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:22:00 AM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:21:00 PM
Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at: 0.32" + Indent at: 0.57"
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:20:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:22:00 PM
Indent: First line: 0.43"
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:52:00 PM
’s
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 11:30:00 AM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:53:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.5"
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:31:00 PM
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:21:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 9: Inserted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:10:00 PM
-
Page 9: Deleted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:10:00 PM
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:21:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 9: Inserted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:10:00 PM
-
Page 9: Deleted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:10:00 PM
Page 9: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 11:31:00 AM
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:31:00 PM
Underline
Page 9: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:22:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
TRAVERTINE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Page 9: Deleted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:10:00 PM
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:32:00 PM
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:24:00 PM
Font: 12 pt, Italic
Header and footer changes
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:27:00 PM
Page 9: Deleted Hilary Juberg 10/14/2020 3:07:00 PM
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:27:00 PM
Page 9: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:12:00 PM
Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Page 1: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 10:11:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:25:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 9: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:14:00 PM
Font: Bold
Footnote changes
Endnote changes
3RD REVIEW CORRECTIONS - ZC 08-10-2021
Main document changes and comments
Page 1: Deleted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:21:00 PM
v
PROPOSED
JEFFERSON STREET
....
/H
Existing Zoning Plan Proposed Zoning Plan
Zoning Acres Un its Acres Units
Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 301.3 442
Medium Density Residential 89.3 758
Medium High Density Residential 84.4 774
Neighborhood Commercial 10.0
Tourist Commercial 30.9 71.8
Golf Course 377 .5 153.4
Open Space 4.1 226.6
Master Plan Roadways 20.1 35.1
Total 909.2 1526 877.5 1200
AVENUE62
1I '
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 1: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 9:42:00 AM
v
Page 1: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:22:00 PM
Proposed Zoning Plan
City of La Quinta -
Page 1: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:32:00 PM
Indent: First line: 0.5"
Page 1: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:23:00 PM
Centered
Page 2: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/14/2020 2:32:00 PM
Indent: First line: 0.5"
Page 2: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:16:00 PM
-
Page 2: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:16:00 PM
–
Page 2: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:23:00 PM
Page 2: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:16:00 PM
Existing
Page 2: Inserted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:23:00 PM
Zoning Plan
Page 2: Formatted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:24:00 PM
Centered
Page 3: Deleted Hilary Juberg 10/13/2020 1:22:00 PM
Existing Zoning Plan Proposed Zoning Plan
Zoning Acres Unit s Acres Units
Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 301.3 442
Medium Density Residential 89.3 758
Medium High DensityHigh-Density
Residential l
84.4 774
Neighborhood Commercial 10.0
Tourist Commercial 30.9 71.8
Golf Course 377.5 153.4
Open Space 4.1 226.6
Master Plan Roadways 20.1 35.1
Total 909.2 1526 877.5 1200
AVENUE 62
Section Break (Continuous)
1'
E::::::J E
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:20:00 PM
High-Density
Page 3: Formatted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:18:00 PM
Not Strikethrough
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 9:50:00 AM
,
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 9:49:00 AM
Golf Course
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:43:00 AM
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 9:49:00 AM
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:23:00 PM
,
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:24:00 PM
and a
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:24:00 PM
,
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:23:00 PM
GPA 08-113)
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:24:00 PM
Development Agreement
Page 3: Commented [CF1] Cheri Flores 1/18/2021 6:07:00 PM
We still need this application. Please submit ASAP.
Page 3: Commented [JS2R1] JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 9:50:00 AM
ok
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:24:00 PM
, Tentative Tract Map
Page 3: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:24:00 PM
Environmental Impact Report
Page 3: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:23:00 PM
(ZC 08-133)
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:16:00 AM
golf
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:16:00 AM
putting
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:16:00 AM
, four-hole golf course
Page 3: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:15:00 AM
club
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:15:00 AM
banquet
Page 3: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:19:00 AM
, a wedding garden
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:44:00 AM
s
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:51:00 PM
landscaping..
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:51:00 PM
landscaping
Page 4: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:25:00 PM
, and access to pedestrian walkways, providing a walkable community for the residents
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:51:00 PM
.
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:23:00 AM
gated
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:53:00 PM
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:53:00 PM
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:55:00 PM
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:59:00 PM
Heading 1
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:54:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:59:00 PM
Heading 1, Space Before: 0 pt
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:24:00 AM
As stated above, nd
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:24:00 AM
An
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
delete the gated portion of Jefferson Street within the project, and the deletion of Avenue 62 west of the
hypothetical southerly extension of Madison Street, and the
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
e
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
ion
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
the extension
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:12:00 PM
0
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:12:00 PM
2
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
for public use.
Page 4: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:25:00 AM
.
Page 4: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:59:00 PM
Page 4: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:59:00 PM
Heading 1, Left, Indent: Left: 0", Right: 0", Space Before: 0 pt
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:59:00 PM
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 9:28:00 AM
380
Page 5: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:10:00 PM
Highlight
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:21:00 AM
334
Page 5: Commented [CF3] Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:10:00 PM
Revise to be consistent with GPA docs
Page 5: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:10:00 PM
Highlight
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:22:00 AM
a golf training facility,
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:08:00 PM
s
Page 5: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:50:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:00:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:31:00 AM
2
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:31:00 AM
6
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:32:00 AM
acres
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:32:00 AM
miles
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:35:00 AM
and
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:15:00 PM
153
Page 5: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:45:00 PM
122
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:15:00 PM
122
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:34:00 AM
236.1
Page 5: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:45:00 PM
236.1
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:15:00 PM
334
Page 5: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:25:00 PM
Highlight
Page 5: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:35:00 AM
and 122 acres of golf course
Page 5: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:45:00 PM
and 122 acres of golf course
Page 5: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:45:00 PM
/ golf, 162 152 acres of restricted open space, 864 acres of recreational open space
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:07:00 AM
152
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:37:00 AM
8
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:24:00 AM
and a golf training facility with driving range and banquet facilities
Page 5: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/22/2021 11:02:00 AM
Page 6: Formatted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:45:00 PM
Right: 0"
Page 6: Inserted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 5:03:00 PM
.
Page 6: Deleted Cheri Flores 1/20/2021 10:53:00 AM
GOAL H-2
Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and
moderate-income households.
Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan is designed to provide a range of housing types and
densities at varying price points that will help meet the anticipated demand for housing
within different economic segments of the City.
Page 6: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:57:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
w
Page 6: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:57:00 PM
Right: 0.49"
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:57:00 PM
w
Page 6: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:53:00 AM
course
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:53:00 AM
facility
Page 6: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 10:06:00 AM
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:53:00 PM
, if necessary.
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:53:00 PM
.
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:38:00 AM
163
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:38:00 AM
152
Page 7: Commented [CF4] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:32:00 PM
The GPA doc shows 163 acres. Please correct whichever document is correct.
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:34:00 AM
, and
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:34:00 AM
.
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:35:00 AM
an additional 149 acres of open space adjacent to the preserve area.
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:37:00 AM
This
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:37:00 AM
These 301 acres
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:35:00 AM
preserve area
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:37:00 AM
the
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:38:00 AM
with
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:38:00 AM
that
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:00:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:54:00 PM
We have satisfied all AB 52 consultation and have redesigned our project
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:54:00 PM
The project has been redesigned
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:43:00 AM
as identified in the project EIR.
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:16:00 PM
as identified inthe project EIR.
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:27:00 AM
, if necessary.
Page 7: Deleted Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:34:00 PM
, if necessary.
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 12/15/2020 1:41:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0"
Page 7: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:19:00 PM
Justified, Indent: Left: 0.99", Right: 0.49", Space Before: 1.2 pt, Line spacing: Multiple 1.08 li, Tab stops: 2.22", Left +
2.95", Left + 4.17", Left + 4.88", Left + 5.68", Left + 6.73", Left
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/11/2021 10:54:00 AM
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:28:00 AM
club
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:28:00 AM
facility
Page 7: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:28:00 AM
and golf course
Page 7: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/16/2021 10:23:00 AM
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/22/2021 11:02:00 AM
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:40:00 AM
163
Page 8: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:27:00 PM
Highlight
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:31:00 AM
301
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:19:00 PM
and an
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:19:00 PM
and an
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:41:00 AM
108
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 10:40:00 AM
64
Page 8: Commented [CF5] Cheri Flores 12/22/2020 4:36:00 PM
The GPA Statement shows 301 acres for habitat and 60 acres for recreational. Please correct to make them both statements
consistent
Page 8: Formatted Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:27:00 PM
Highlight
Page 8: Commented [CF6] Cheri Flores 8/10/2021 2:27:00 PM
Check the acreages please.
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Heading 1, Indent: Left: 0", Right: 0.51"
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Heading 1, Right: 0.51"
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Page 8: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 2:01:00 PM
Heading 1, Right: 0.51", Space Before: 0 pt
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:50:00 PM
xxx
Page 8: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 10/1/2020 1:50:00 PM
larger area related to the Middle North and Middle South streams
Page 8: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:55:00 PM
to
Page 9: Inserted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:23:00 PM
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:21:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.99", First line: 0.01"
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 1:25:00 PM
Indent: Left: 0.99"
Page 9: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:56:00 PM
’s
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:13:00 AM
Indent: Left: 1", Right: 0", Space Before: 0 pt
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:12:00 AM
Not Expanded by / Condensed by
Page 9: Deleted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:12:00 AM
Section Break (Next Page)
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:13:00 AM
Body Text, Indent: Left: 1"
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:12:00 AM
Font: 12 pt
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:13:00 AM
Indent: Left: 1", Space Before: 0 pt
Page 9: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 3/19/2021 9:13:00 AM
Left, Indent: Left: 1", Right: 0", Space Before: 0 pt
Header and footer changes
Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:52:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Inserted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:12:00 PM
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:52:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 3: Inserted Hilary Juberg 4/26/2021 3:12:00 PM
Page 3: Formatted JoAnne Sturges 9/30/2020 12:52:00 PM
Font: Bold
Footnote changes
Endnote changes
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS PALEO 8-2021
Main document changes and comments
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
NOVEMBER
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:04:00 AM
AUGUST
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
1
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
0
Page 3: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
November
Page 3: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:04:00 AM
August
Page 3: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
1
Page 3: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 3:20:00 PM
0
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:11:00 AM
area of potential effects (APE)
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:11:00 AM
Project area
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:30:00 PM
approximately
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:30:00 PM
55
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:30:00 PM
77.5
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
vertical APE for the Project (
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:21:00 AM
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:22:00 AM
pre-construction ground-disturbances
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:24:00 AM
construction required for each task
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
within the Project area
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
)
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:24:00 AM
consists of cut-fill grading to maximum depths of 50 feet below ground surface, with 5 feet of over-
excavation throughout the central portion of the Project area and 4 feet of removal along the southern and
western portions of the Project area.
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:24:00 AM
is not planned to exceed 5 feet in grading depth.
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
APE
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
Project area
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
APE
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:12:00 AM
Project area
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:13:00 AM
APE
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:13:00 AM
area
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:14:00 AM
s
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:13:00 AM
and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which constitutes a federal nexus
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:15:00 AM
The location of the APE on BOR and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land constitutes a federal
nexus.
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:15:00 AM
APE
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:15:00 AM
Project area
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:56:00 PM
three
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:56:00 PM
multiple
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:56:00 PM
gravels
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:56:00 PM
landslide deposits,
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:57:00 PM
, as well as unmapped Lake Cahuilla beds underlying alluvial deposits at shallow depth
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:18:00 AM
has PFYC 2 (Low) to PFYC 4 (High), increasing with depth; alluvial fan gravels have PFYC 2 (Low) to
PFYC 3 (Moderate), increasing with depth; landslide deposits have PFYC 2 (Low); Lake Cahuilla Beds
have PFYC 4 (High); and quartz diorite has PFYC 1 (Very Low).
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:18:00 AM
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:18:00 AM
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:21:00 AM
and alluvial fans: PFYC 2 (Low) increasing to PFYC 4 (High) in the shallow subsurface; quartz diorite:
PFYC 1 (Very Low).
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:23:00 AM
in the APE
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:23:00 AM
in the Project area
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:53:00 AM
consist of grading
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:53:00 AM
will impact sediments to maximum
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:51:00 AM
at
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:58:00 PM
of no more
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:52:00 AM
of 50
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:52:00 AM
than 5
Page i: Commented [JC1] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:05:00 AM
What does this mean? Will new scientific information result from the prescribed on-going monitoring? Do these
well studies resources warrant the “high-sensitivity” characterization?
Page i: Commented [JC2] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:07:00 AM
Is this correct? With the wealth oof info already collected, why is this warranted?
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
P
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
p
Page i: Commented [JC3] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:09:00 AM
Please further consider whether the potential resources warrant such requirements.
Page i: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
P
Page i: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
p
Page ii: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
P
Page ii: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
p
Page iv: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:48:00 PM
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1
Regulatory Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Federal Regulations ................................................................................................................................ 4
Paleontological Resources Preservation Act, Public Law 111-011, Title VI, Subtitle D,
2009 ................................................................................................................................................. 4
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 ........................................................................ 4
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ............................................................................. 4
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 ..................................................................................... 5
Antiquities Act of 1906 .................................................................................................................... 5
State Regulations .................................................................................................................................... 5
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) .............................................................................. 5
Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.5 ................................................................................ 5
Local Regulations ................................................................................................................................... 6
Riverside County General Plan ........................................................................................................ 6
City of La Quinta General Plan ....................................................................................................... 6
City of La Quinta Municipal Code .................................................................................................. 7
Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 7
Definition and Significance of Paleontological Resources .................................................................... 7
Professional Standards ........................................................................................................................... 8
BLM Potential Fossil Yield Classification ............................................................................................. 9
Results ........................................................................................................................................................ 12
Geological Setting ................................................................................................................................ 12
Geology and Paleontology of the Project Area .................................................................................... 13
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 17
References Cited ........................................................................................................................................ 19
Page iv: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Page v: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Figure 1. Project vicinity. .............................................................................................................................. 2
Figure 2. Project location. ............................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3. Geologic map of the Project area, after Dibblee and Minch (2008). ........................................... 14
Page v: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Page v: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Table 1. Geologic Units Underlying the Project Area ................................................................................ 15
Table 2. LACM Fossil Localities Nearest the Project Area ........................................................................ 15
Page v: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
area
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
’s Area of Potential Effects (APE)
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 4:24:00 PM
approximately
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 4:25:00 PM
55
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 4:24:00 PM
77.5
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
APE
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
area
Page 1: Inserted John Criste 8/12/2021 11:15:00 AM
City of La Quinta and
Page 1: Inserted John Criste 8/12/2021 11:16:00 AM
s
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
APE
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:26:00 AM
Project area
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:27:00 AM
APE
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:27:00 AM
Project area
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
P
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
p
Page 1: Commented [JC4] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:18:00 AM
Same report or background for this report? If background, please provide this to the City.
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
P
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:46:00 PM
p
Page 1: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:27:00 AM
APE
Page 1: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:27:00 AM
Project area
Page 1: Commented [JC5] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:21:00 AM
What is SVP? Spell out.
Page 2: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:12:00 PM
Page 2: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 4:24:00 PM
Page 3: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:13:00 PM
Page 3: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 4:24:00 PM
Page 6: Commented [JC6] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:23:00 AM
Are County policies relevant?
Page 6: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/27/2021 5:26:00 PM
City of La Quinta General Plan
The Natural Resources Element of the City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan (City of La Quinta 2013)
contains one goal pertinent to the protection of paleontological resources with the City of La Quinta’s
Sphere of Influence. Goal CUL-1 requires the protection of significant archaeological, historic, and
paleontological resources which occur in the City. Within Goal CUL-1, three policies ensure the
consideration of paleontological resources:
Policy CUL-1.3: Educate the public about the City’s history and paleontology.
o Program CUL-1.3.b: Continue to support efforts at curation and exhibition of the City’s
history.
o Program CUL-1.3.c: Consider expanding collections to include paleontological resources.
o Program CUL-1.3.d: Encourage the Desert Sands and Coachella Unified School Districts to
include local history and paleontology in their curricula.
Policy CUL-1.4: Make all reasonable efforts to identify paleontological resources in the City.
o Program CUL-1.4.a: Any development application for a vacant site located on soils
identified as Lake Cahuilla Beds or Pleistocene shall be accompanied by a Phase I
paleontological analysis conducted by a qualified geologist or paleontologist.
o Program CUL-1.4.b: As part of the geotechnical analysis conducted for grading and
building permits, soil borings shall be examined by a qualified geologist or paleontologist to
assure that no Pleistocene or older soils occur at depth in areas to be excavated. Monitoring
shall be required if Pleistocene or older soils will be impacted by excavations.
Policy CUL-1.5: All reasonable efforts should be made to preserve paleontological resources in
the City.
o Program CUL-1.5.a: Significant paleontological resources identified on a site shall be
professionally collected, catalogued, and deposited with a recognized repository.
City of La Quinta Municipal Code
Title 7 of the Historical Preservation of the La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 238, Chapter 7.06:
Historic Resources, Historic Landmarks and Historic Districts establishes that City Council shall establish
and maintain a historic resources inventory according to the requirements of the State Historic
Preservation Office. Criteria for inclusion in the history resources inventory includes archaeological,
paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, and geographical sites that have the
potential to yield information of scientific value (City of La Quinta 1993).
Page 7: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
APE
Page 7: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
Project area
Page 7: Commented [JC7] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:25:00 AM
Were no field surveys performed?
Page 7: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
APE
Page 7: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
Project area
Page 7: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
APE
Page 7: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:28:00 AM
Project area
Page 7: Commented [JC8] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:26:00 AM
Do any of the prospective finds rise to this level?
The CVWD EIR prepared for the recharge basins determined that the potential was less than significant.
Page 12: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:29:00 AM
APE
Page 12: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:29:00 AM
Project area
Page 13: Commented [JC9] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:42:00 AM
Is this a correct description? Rather, the river filled the pre-existing trough.
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
Project Area
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:47:00 AM
APE
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:30:00 AM
APE
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:30:00 AM
Project area
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:31:00 AM
Three
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:31:00 AM
Four
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:32:00 AM
present
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:32:00 AM
mapped
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:31:00 AM
APE
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:31:00 AM
Project area at the surface, plus one geologic unit present (but unmapped) in the subsurface
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:34:00 PM
a
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:32:00 AM
APE
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:32:00 AM
Project area
Page 13: Commented [JC10] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:45:00 AM
Do you mean the Coachella Valley and at similar conditions?
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:45:00 PM
APE
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:45:00 PM
Project area
Page 13: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
APE
Page 13: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
Project area
Page 14: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:13:00 PM
Page 14: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 4:23:00 PM
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
Project Area
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
Project Area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
Project area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:32:00 PM
,
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:32:00 PM
,
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:33:00 PM
margin of
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
Project area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:32:00 PM
Landslide Deposits Qls Low (PFYC 2) Southern margin of the Project
area
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:05:00 PM
-
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
Project area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
APE
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
Project area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
Project area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
APE
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:33:00 AM
Project Area
Page 15: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
Project Area
Page 15: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:44:00 PM
APE
Page 16: Commented [JC11] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:50:00 AM
None or almost none of the cited resources or locations are comparable to those on the project site and vicinity. In
the CV, the Palm Springs formation harbors most of the Pleistocene resources…..
Page 16: Commented [JC12] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:52:00 AM
Ditto…
Page 16: Commented [JC13] John Criste 8/12/2021 11:53:00 AM
You mean the northwest portion.
Also note that just about the entire Project site is on an alluvial fan.
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:34:00 AM
APE
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:34:00 AM
Project area
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:35:00 AM
APE
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:35:00 AM
Project area
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:34:00 AM
APE
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:34:00 AM
Project area
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:44:00 PM
gravity-controlled debris flows from the
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:44:00 PM
and transportation downslope via gravity-controlled debris flow
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:44:00 PM
to the southwest
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:08:00 PM
with a mixture of grain sizes
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:15:00 PM
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:15:00 PM
-
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:08:00 PM
ich such sediments are deposited. Unlike alluvial fans, landslide deposits often have a bouldery front near
the head of the debris flow and a relatively finer-grained tail (Pánek 2021). The Project area is situated
along the head of the former debris flow, with large boulders and rubble situated along the southern
margin of the Project area. Therefore, landslide deposits are assigned a Low (PFYC 2) sensitivity.
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:08:00 PM
ich such deposits form.
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:04:00 PM
Although not mapped at the surface within the Project area,
Page 16: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:05:00 PM
The project area may be partially underlain at relatively shallow depths by
Page 16: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:07:00 PM
may be present at relatively shallow depth
Page 17: Commented [JC14] John Criste 8/12/2021 12:40:00 PM
What did CVWD encounter in the recharge basins? They concluded that resource potential was less than significant.
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted John Criste 8/12/2021 12:42:00 PM
northwest
Page 17: Inserted John Criste 8/12/2021 12:42:00 PM
northeast
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:45:00 PM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:45:00 PM
Project area
Page 17: Commented [JC15] John Criste 8/12/2021 12:45:00 PM
Northeast? NW is mountains.
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:36:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:37:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:37:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:39:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:39:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:43:00 AM
al deposits
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:40:00 AM
al units
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:42:00 AM
that are present at the surface within
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:42:00 AM
in
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:37:00 AM
APE
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:37:00 AM
Project area
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:42:00 AM
at the surface
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:42:00 AM
to
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:41:00 AM
High (PFYC 4)
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:41:00 AM
in
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:57:00 AM
Project-related ground-disturbing activities within the Project area will impact sediments to maximum
depths of 50 feet below ground surface, with
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 9:57:00 AM
Ground-disturbing activities associated with the project include excavations for the replacement of
towers, as well as other currently unspecified ground-disturbing activities,
Page 17: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 3:15:00 PM
substantial grading, excavating, and trenching for the construction of 1,200 dwelling units of varying
types, a golf training facility, a 100-villa resort, a wellness spa, tourist recreational facilities (including
restaurants, small shops, spas, lounge and activity rooms, outdoor areas, tennis courts, yoga areas, etc.),
bike lanes, pedestrian walkways, the Travertine community trail, recreational open space areas, a staging
area for construction, CVWD well sites, an off-site five-acre IID substation, a perimeter flood protection
barrier, two off-site booster stations, and water/sewer/utility tie-ins. Grading within the Project site is
anticipated to occur in two phases, with Phase A in the southern half and Phase B in the northern half.
Ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project’s construction would have the potential to impact
geologic units of Moderate (PFYC 3) or High (PFYC 4) paleontological sensitivity, which
Page 17: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:20:00 PM
which
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:22:00 PM
geologic units with moderate or high sensitivity
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 4:22:00 PM
the Project site near the surface or at depth
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:47:00 PM
P
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:47:00 PM
p
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:38:00 AM
APE
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:38:00 AM
Project area
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:48:00 PM
P
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 5:48:00 PM
p
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:44:00 AM
APE
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 8/2/2021 11:44:00 AM
Project area
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:47:00 PM
landslide deposits and
Page 18: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:18:00 PM
should
Page 18: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 2:18:00 PM
will
Page 19: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 1:34:00 PM
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Page 19: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 1:34:00 PM
https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument?id=16390
Page 19: Deleted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 1:33:00 PM
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Page 19: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 1:33:00 PM
https://www.laquintaca.gov/
Page 19: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 1:33:00 PM
business/design-and-development/planning-division/2035-la-quinta-general-plan
Page 20: Inserted Mathew Carson 4/28/2021 5:49:00 PM
Pánek, T. 2021. Landslides and Related Sediments. In Encyclopedia of Geology, second edition, edited by
D. Alderton and S.A. Elias, pp. 708-728, Academic Press, San Diego, California.
Header and footer changes
Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Footnote changes
Endnote changes
Response to Comments from City of La Quinta re: EA Technical Studies for the Travertine Specific Plan
Project from April 2, 2021 – Cultural & Paleo Resources
Review by J Criste 8.10.21
Cultural Resources Reports
Integrated Report: What are the original report and referenced supplemental report? As noted in the
reviewed docs and in the addenda, a “front-end” needs to be drafted that summarizes all of the
reporting, makes appropriate references to earlier docs and includes those docs as appendices.
Multiple technical cultural resources reports have been prepared for the project to reflect the evolving
project description and footprint over time. It is standard practice to cumulatively assess changes to a
project area rather than restate findings for the entire project area in each study unless the previous
efforts were conducted a significant time in the past (typically over 10 years). The original study for this
project was in 2006; SWCA therefore conducted an updated assessment of the project area in 2017.
Since 2017, the project footprint has changed and SWCA conducted another assessment focused on
those changes in 2019-2020. That assessment is the focus of the current technical document under
review by the City.
The EIR for the project will synthesize all cultural resource efforts to date. SWCA has therefore not
prepared a “front end” document summarizing the three reporting efforts. SWCA has included the
previous reports as an attachment to this document. Please note that the 2006 and 2017 reports are
very large files.
Addendum to the Supplemental Cultural Resources Technical Report (11.17.20).
1. Integrated Reports: What are the original report and referenced supplemental report? As noted
below and in the addenda, a “front-end” need to be drafted that summarizes all of the reporting, makes
appropriate references to earlier docs and includes those docs as appendices.
See previous comment.
2. Introduction: Is a copy of the referenced 2006 report available? Can it be integrated into the
requested CR summary and made an appendix? Please see Track Changes document for other, more
minor comments and corrections.
See previous comment.
3. “Open Desert Trail” & Revised APE: The revised APE removes most of the S1/2 of Section 4 but the SP
proposes an “Open Desert Trail” (SP p.2-4). As noted elsewhere, recent work for the USBR and BLM
required trails to be included in our APE. Here too, the SP trail needs to be a part of the APE.
The trail has been removed from the project and is no longer part of the APE.
4. Figure 2: Please add back the federal and tribal ownerships included in an earlier version of this
report.
Commented [SC1]: These comments are copied directly
from the cover letter from the City dated 4/2/21
Commented [JC2]: This may be optimistic; it will be a
challenge for the EIR authors. Will require a lot of
deciphering of what is relevant. Reviewers will include City,
Tribes, SHPO, BLM and USBR archaeologists. Still suggest
taking the time to write up a front end.
Formatted: Highlight
Commented [JC3]: Have secured copy of 2006 report.
Commented [JC4]: Please make appendix to updated
reports.
SWCA has added the requested labels to the figures.
5. Area of Potential Effect (p.5): Only a limited portion of the APE, as currently mapped, is located within
areas that are or have been in cultivation, being limited to the vineyard above the CVWD recharge
ponds. The balance is essentially undisturbed lands. Please correct.
SWCA has updated this description.
6. Area of Potential Effect (p.5): The delineated APE may be too small, and grading, excavation, bridge
and channel construction could result in work outside this APE. Please consider enlarging to ensure all
areas of potential disturbance are covered.
Large projects with multiple and evolving designs often require different levels of analysis. SWCA has
therefore defined both an Area of Potential Effect (APE) and an Area of Direct Impact (ADI) for the
project. The APE is the maximum extent of proposed project footprint, including areas that will not
necessarily be subject to construction or development activities. The ADI includes those areas within the
APE where project construction and development activities are scheduled to take place and that could
have the direct potential to affect or impact cultural resources. So while there are eligible cultural
resources within the APE, the ADI has been modified to avoid all known eligible resources and sensitive
cultural areas.
7. Vertical APE (p.5): Based on preliminary assessment of project TTM, drainage plan, major and
presumably deep excavations will occur especially along the west edge of the project and within the
western portion thereof. Excavations here and elsewhere are shown to be up to 30 feet or more for
diversion levees, stormwater detention basons and other improvements. This vertical APE depth needs
to be changed. Please confer with the project engineers.
SWCA has updated this description.
Supplement to the Addendum to the Supplemental Cultural Resources Technical Report (12.28.20)
1. This report addresses only the “off-site” lands that may host wells and an electric sub-station required
of the Project. This is a supplement to the addendum to the supplement... This and the preceding CR
documents need to be consolidated into a single document with a summary front-end that also
effectively directs the reader to the appropriate appendix (previous studies, supplements and addenda).
It is unreasonable to expect the City, local Tribes and the state and federal agencies to try and piece this
together.
SWCA has incorporated this analysis into the technical report; there is no longer a separate supplement
to the addendum.
As noted in the responses to the Addendum above, the EIR will synthesize all cultural resource study
efforts to date. SWCA has therefore not prepared a “front end” document summarizing the three
reporting efforts.
2. Page 1, Paragraph 3: APE Description: SP calls for a trail meandering through the area removed from
the APE. The trail and its potential effects need to be documents and mitigated in this or related reports
and included in the above referenced “Summary Report”. The APE should also include the segment of
Ave 62 extending east from the project to and along south boundary lines of Section 35 & 36. This will
be consistent with the Paleo APE as well.
See previous comments regarding the APE.
3. Geoarchaeological Assessment: Cites period of early agriculture. Agriculture in the Valley did not
begin in earnest until the beginning of the 20th century and not until the All-American Branch Canal was
built near the middle of the century did lands like this go into cultivate. Please correct.
Discussion has been updated.
6
4. Recommendations: The potential for significant impacts is acknowledged but the recommendations
do not constitute mitigation? The wells and sub-station are part of the Project. As such, their respective
impacts need to be addressed in greater detail and a set of mitigation measures developed that can
demonstrably ensure that potential impacts will be managed so they are less than significant.
Also, to the extent the deeper vertical APE may affect future survey protocol and mitigation, please
make the appropriate changes in this regard.
SWCA recommended further study to determine actual impacts and proposed mitigation once the
specific locations for the wells and substation have been identified. SWCA did not provide specific
resource protection measures at this time because the APE and design for those project features is still
under development. Please see recommendations for further discussion regarding future work for these
proposed project areas.
Paleontological Resources Reports
Page 1: Highlighted Text “Project APE”
Comment: APE should include southern trails
Response: SWCA conferred with TRG regarding the latest project design and features and updated as
needed. Throughout the paleontological resources report, the phase “Project APE” was updated to
“Project area” since defining an APE is not required for paleontological resources.
Page 6: Highlighted Text “Local Regulations” Section
Comment: Add discussion regarding LaQ Historic Preservation Ord (238) of 1993. Can be found at:
https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument?id=16390. Updated Historic Preservation
Code: http://qcode.us/codes/laquinta/view.php?topic=7&frames=on.
Response: SWCA updated the Local Regulations section to include the City of La Quinta Historic
Preservation Ordinance 238 (1993) and the updated Historic Preservation Code.
Page 15: Highlighted Text in Table 1: Geologic Units Underlying the APE: “Lake Cahuilla Beds”, “-“, “High
(PFYC 4)”, and “Subsurface”
Comment: N/A
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Response: No comment was left by the reviewers; however, presumably this highlighted text is in
reference to the geologic map, which did not have Lake Cahuilla Beds mapped at the surface within the
Project area. Lake Cahuilla Beds are present in the subsurface of the Project area, underlying young
alluvial deposits. Lake Cahuilla Beds are extremely fossiliferous, and although not mapped at the
surface, they will likely be impacted by ground-disturbing activities at shallow depth. Therefore, this unit
was included in this analysis. SWCA provided clarification on why this geologic unit was included in the
analysis.
Page 16: Highlighted Text “The project area may be partially underlain at relatively shallow depths by
early to middle Holocene age sediments of Lake Cahuilla near its ancient shoreline located along the
eastern property boundary (S” … “Paleosalinity data derived from fossil mollusk shells indicate that the
last natural filling of Lake Cahuilla occurred around 1500 A.D. (“ … “The most abundant molluscan taxa,
Tryonia protea, Fontelicella longinqua, and Physa humerosa, are characteristic of shallow water lakes in
the Colorado Deser” … “sponges,”.
Response: See response above. This section was copied directly from the 2007 paleontological
assessment drafted by SWCA and was double checked for its validity.
Page 17: Commented on “Conclusion” Section
Comment: What towers are being referred to? The project description has been completed for some
time. Significant cuts into older alluvium and elsewhere will occur at delineated locations. Please confer
with the project proponent to get clarity on the proposed plan and site disturbance.
Response: SWCA conferred with TRG regarding the latest project design and features and updated as
needed.
Page 17: Highlighted Text “The alluvial units in the APE are too young to preserve fossils at the surface
but increase to High (PFYC 4) sensitivity in the subsurface.” … “replacement of towers” … “other
currently unspecified ground-disturbing activities”
Comment: What towers are being referred to? The project description has been completed for some
time. Significant cuts into older alluvium and elsewhere will occur at delineated locations. Please confer
with the project proponent to get clarity on the proposed plan and site disturbance.
Response: SWCA conferred with TRG regarding the latest project design and features and updated as
needed.
Page 17: Highlighted Text “Should”
Comment: “will be conducted…”
Response: SWCA updated the language from “should” to “will”.
4TH REVIEW COMMENTS - CR 8-2021
Main document changes and comments
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:17:00 PM
Mandi Martinez
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:17:00 PM
Stephanie Cimino
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:17:00 PM
S
Page 1: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 11:16:00 AM
enior
Page 1: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 11:16:00 AM
r.
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:17:00 PM
r.
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:16:00 PM
November 17,
Page 1: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 11:16:00 AM
2020July
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:16:00 PM
July
Page 1: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 11:16:00 AM
August
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:16:00 PM
Page 1: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 11:16:00 AM
30
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:16:00 PM
30, 2021
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 1
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 1
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:03:00 PM
on
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:03:00 PM
adjacent to or crossing
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
In
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
From
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
and
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
through
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
0
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:09:00 PM
1
Page 1: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:27:00 PM
,
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:28:00 PM
redrawn
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:28:00 PM
expanded
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:28:00 PM
to exclude all known resources contributing to the MMRD and
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:30:00 PM
original
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:27:00 PM
see
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 2
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 2
Page 1: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:11:00 AM
and Figure 3
Page 1: Commented [JC1] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:34:00 AM
As with other project components, the APE must include the CVWD “well field” and prospective IID substation
“area” and these need to be analysed at least on a landscape scale or level. They are essential parts of the Project and
must be given a meaningful level of analysis now that is included in the forthcoming EIR. Materials at end of this
discussion should be brought forward so the Project as a whole is clearly described up front.
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:26:00 PM
revised
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:08:00 AM
newly added portions of the
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:23:00 PM
e.
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:23:00 PM
e (additional APE).
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:06:00 PM
locations
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:06:00 PM
sites
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:07:00 PM
assessment of the parcels was limited to reviewing publicly available literature and assessing
geoarchaeological sensitivity; no formal records search or pedestrian survey was conducted for the off-site
infrastructure project areas.
Page 1: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:07:00 PM
will be analyzed in an update to this addendum at a future date.
Page 1: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:32:00 PM
Although the overall APE has expanded, the area of direct impact (ADI), defined as those areas proposed
for project construction and development activities, has been reduced to exclude all known resources
contributing to the MMRD and other culturally sensitive areas.
Page 1: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:38:00 AM
Page 1: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:20:00 AM
Page 1: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:23:00 PM
Page 2: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:11:00 PM
2019–2020
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:11:00 PM
between 2019 and 2021 and assesses overall project impacts within the APE and ADI. Details for
previous findings can be found in the 2006 and 2017 studies
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:05:00 AM
(Sikes and O’Neil 2006
Page 2: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:45:00 AM
;
Page 2: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:45:00 AM
,
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:05:00 AM
, Martinez and Nicolay 2017) included as Appendix
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:12:00 AM
A (note that the 2006 report
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:49:00 PM
is included as an appendix to the 2017 report)
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:05:00 AM
. This study includes the results of an updated records search for the APE, an intensive pedestrian survey
of those portions of the APE not covered in previous reports,
Page 2: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:45:00 AM
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:26:00 PM
a summary of all resources within the APE and ADI, an archaeological sensitivity assessment for the
proposed off-site infrastructure areas, and management recommendations for the project as a whole that
incorporates the results of AB52 consultation.
Page 2: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:48:00 AM
s
Page 2: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:35:00 PM
. Details for previous findings can be found in the 2017 study (Martinez and Nicolay 2017). The current
study includes an updated records search for the additional APE, an intensive pedestrian survey of the
additional APE, a summary of resources within the revised APE and management recommendations for
the project as a whole that incorporates the results of AB52 consultation.
Page 2: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:16:00 PM
This supplement to the 2020 addendum provides a cultural resource sensitivity assessment for the parcels
identified to support off-site project infrastructure (Figure 2). This assessment is intended to help the
project proponent determine the location that will ultimately be added to the APE. The current study
assesses the potential for the presence of undocumented resources (in the form of buried archaeological
sites) within the proposed off-site infrastructure project areas.
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:53:00 PM
;
Page 2: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:53:00 PM
,
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:05:00 PM
Cultural Resources Team Lead
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:13:00 PM
Mandi Martinez, M.A.
Page 2: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:48:00 AM
,
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:14:00 PM
Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA)
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:53:00 PM
;
Page 2: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:53:00 PM
,
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:14:00 PM
, Principal Investigator Michael Bever, Ph.D., RPA
Page 2: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 1:53:00 PM
.;
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:13:00 PM
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:14:00 PM
RPA,
Page 2: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:13:00 PM
Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA),
Page 2: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:23:00 PM
.,
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:28:00 PM
and Mathew Carson, M.A.
Page 2: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:28:00 PM
.
Page 2: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:05:00 AM
Page 4: Deleted Michael Bever 8/5/2021 3:32:00 PM
revised
Page 4: Commented [JC2] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:38:00 AM
Please include water well field and substation planning area in APE.
Page 5: Commented [JC3] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:39:00 AM
Please include water well field and substation planning area in APE.
Page 6: Commented [JC4] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:41:00 AM
At least reference addendum where this can be found.
Page 6: Commented [JC5] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:01:00 AM
RE-WRITE DISCUSSION TO INCLUDE WELL AND SUB-STATION THREE SQUARE
MILE AREA AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION ENTITLED “WELL PAD AND SUBSTATION
CULTURAL RESOURCES SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT”. SEE FIGURE 19 ON PAGE
49.
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:47:00 AM
The APE is currently developed as agricultural land.
Page 6: Commented [JC6] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:43:00 AM
The Project requires seven off-site well and one IID substation. These at least generally delineated areas need to be
included in the APE and this and other relevant documents and exhibits.
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:48:00 AM
on undeveloped
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:48:00 AM
or agricultural land
Page 6: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 2
Page 6: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 2
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:19:00 AM
969
Page 6: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:19:00 AM
678
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:11:00 AM
for direct adverse effects (under Section 106 of the NHPA) or direct impacts (under CEQA)
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:11:00 AM
cultural resources document was completed
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:11:00 AM
investigation by Martinez and Nicolay
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:40:00 PM
The APE was redrawn to exclude the MMRD at the south end of the project.
Page 6: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 9:55:00 AM
Road
Page 6: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 9:55:00 AM
Street
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:14:00 AM
less than one
Page 6: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:43:00 PM
one
Page 6: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:43:00 PM
1
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:14:00 AM
acre for an existing CVWD booster pump on CVWD Dike No. 2 near the intersection of Jefferson Street
and 58th Avenue,
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:13:00 AM
n approximately
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:13:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:13:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:13:00 AM
approximately
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 9:24:00 AM
at Monroe Avenue for a total of
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:19:00 AM
117
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:42:00 PM
acres
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:38:00 AM
Most of this area was
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:42:00 PM
not subject to previous study and
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:20:00 AM
is
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:42:00 PM
the focus of this document
Page 6: Commented [JC7] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:56:00 AM
Expand this new analysis and reporting adding the well field and substation study area to the east of the Project.
Page 6: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:38:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:42:00 PM
Page 6: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:42:00 PM
The revised APE also included an existing CVWD booster pump on CVWD Dike No. 2 near the
intersection of Jefferson Street and 58th Avenue, but this project location was subsequently excluded
from the APE by the time of publishing the current study and is not included in the current analysis. Also
not included in the current analysis are proposed off-site well pad and substation parcels. The total revised
APE now measures 678 acres; 117 of these acres were not subject to previous study and are the focus of
this document
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:38:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:47:00 PM
The location of the off-site well pad and substation
Page 6: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:43:00 PM
had
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:49:00 PM
not been determined at the time of this report and are not included as part of the current APE; the
locations will be added to the APE once
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:23:00 PM
finalized
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:50:00 PM
.
Page 6: Commented [JC8] John Criste 8/11/2021 9:58:00 AM
Please ensure CVWD and IID buy-in on limits of landscape scale analysis for their future facilities.
Page 6: Commented [JC9] John Criste 8/11/2021 10:56:00 AM
When will this report be updated with the off-site utility assessments?
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:43:00 PM
For purposes of analysis, an area of direct impact (ADI) was also identified within the APE where project
construction and development activities will have direct potential to affect (under Section 106 of the
NHPA) or impact (under CEQA) cultural resources. The total ADI comprises
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:20:00 AM
557
Page 6: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:41:00 PM
acres of the APE and excludes the MMRD and other culturally sensitive areas at the south end of the
project.
Page 6: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 12:41:00 PM
required for each task
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 12:41:00 PM
disturbance
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 12:40:00 PM
may reach up to 50 feet below ground surface, with 5 feet of over-excavation throughout the central
portion of the APE
Page 6: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:52:00 AM
,
Page 6: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 12:41:00 PM
and 4 feet of removal along the southern and western portions of the APE.
Page 6: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 6: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 7: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:24:00 PM
2006 and
Page 7: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:52:00 AM
,
Page 7: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:18:00 PM
,
Page 7: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:24:00 PM
and
Page 7: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:24:00 PM
as well as
Page 7: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:38:00 AM
all of
Page 7: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:52:00 PM
the newly added
Page 7: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:25:00 PM
added since the 2017 survey effort
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:20:00 PM
additional
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:20:00 PM
portions of the
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:52:00 PM
2006 or
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:21:00 PM
within
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:52:00 PM
revised
Page 8: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:07:00 AM
Mirelez
Page 8: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:07:00 AM
Mirilez
Page 8: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:07:00 AM
Mirelez
Page 8: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:07:00 AM
Mirilez
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:09:00 AM
(
Page 8: Inserted Michael Bever 8/5/2021 3:41:00 PM
Appendix
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:09:00 AM
Page 8: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:25:00 PM
B
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:09:00 AM
). This included a request for monitors
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:09:00 AM
to be present for both excavation and for observing areas where the excavated soils will be used as fill
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:11:00 AM
to ensure that no artifacts are inadvertently transferred to new portions of the project area. Mr.
Page 8: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:09:00 AM
Mirelez
Page 8: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:09:00 AM
Mirilez
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:12:00 AM
Mirilez indicated that excavations over 10 feet deep would not need to be monitored and that the two
interested tribes could work together to provide monitors as needed (i.e.
Page 8: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 12:46:00 PM
,
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:16:00 AM
one monitor could represent both tribes)
Page 8: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:21:00 AM
A
Page 8: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:21:00 AM
B
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:03:00 AM
She recommended preparation
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:03:00 AM
of an Avoidance and Mitigation Plan developed in consultation with the tribes, fencing around sensitive
resources to ensure avoidance, hiring a compliance officer, and cultural sensitivity training for
construction crews.
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:17:00 AM
, including preparation of a Monitoring and Mitigation Plan that will capture the details described above.
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:16:00 AM
.
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:16:00 AM
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:16:00 AM
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:54:00 PM
since 2017
Page 8: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:55:00 AM
,
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:54:00 PM
. The APE was redrawn to exclude the MMRD at the south end of the project and include a
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:54:00 PM
including the
Page 8: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:56:00 AM
.
Page 8: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:56:00 PM
, even though the sites are no longer within the ADI and will not be impacted by the project
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:55:00 PM
The MMRD is located on the southern edge of the entire Travertine project and does not intersect any of
the additional project area discussed in this technical addendum.
Page 8: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:58:00 PM
Registered Professional Archaeologist (
Page 8: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:58:00 PM
)
Page 8: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:22:00 PM
the
Page 8: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:10:00 AM
Page 8: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:10:00 AM
Page 9: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:10:00 AM
Page 9: Commented [JC10] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:13:00 AM
Study area in this aggregated report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East. The
associated discussions starting on page 46 need to be included here.
Page 9: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:57:00 PM
reflects the revised APE and
Page 9: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:57:00 PM
,
Page 9: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:23:00 AM
3
Page 9: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:23:00 AM
4a-d
Page 9: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:56:00 AM
7
Page 9: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:56:00 AM
8
Page 9: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:57:00 PM
revised
Page 9: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:21:00 AM
Revised
Page 9: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:56:00 AM
Within
Page 9: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:56:00 AM
Outside
Page 12: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:03:00 PM
4a
Page 12: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 11:16:00 AM
3.
Page 12: Commented [JC11] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:18:00 AM
Please include report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East, as appropriate.
Page 13: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:22:00 AM
Figure 4b. Previously conducted cultural resources studies within the project APE and the 0.5-
mile radius of the APE.
Figure 4c. Previously conducted cultural resources studies within the project APE and the 0.5-
mile radius of the APE.
Figure 4d. Previously conducted cultural resources studies within the project APE and the 0.5-
mile radius of the APE.
Page 16: Commented [JC12] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:19:00 AM
Please include report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East, as appropriate.
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:58:00 PM
revised
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:57:00 AM
(Figure 5a-d)
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:57:00 AM
(Figure 6a-d)
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:14:00 PM
37 resources (
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:51:00 PM
six
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:51:00 PM
21
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:07:00 PM
6
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:52:00 PM
0
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:23:00 PM
)
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:58:00 PM
revised
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
, and seven resources (two sites and five isolates)
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:23:00 PM
.
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
are within the ADI.
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:56:00 PM
Five
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:56:00 PM
Six
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:56:00 PM
seven
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:56:00 PM
21
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:55:00 PM
within the APE
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:57:00 PM
P-33-001351, P-33-013296,
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:57:00 PM
P-33-013296,
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:57:00 PM
and
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:59:00 PM
, including one site
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:58:00 PM
(P-33-001340) that is partially with
Page 16: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:59:00 AM
in
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:58:00 PM
the ADI. Five sites are
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:58:00 PM
, and one is
Page 16: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:59:00 AM
listing in
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:58:00 PM
, P-33-003875, P-33-003876, P-33-005319, and P-33-005321
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:00:00 PM
, including one site within the ADI (P-33-001343)
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:00:00 PM
Ten sites are recommended eligible (P-33-001331, P-33-003872, P-33-003873, P-33-003874, P-33-
005323, P-33-014844, P-33-014845, P-33-014846, P-33-014847, and P-33-014988), none of which are in
the ADI.-
Page 16: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:58:00 AM
-
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:04:00 PM
ten
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:07:00 PM
16
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:07:00 PM
(P-33-008919, P-33-008921, P-33-11347, P-33-11348, P-33-11349, P-11350, P-33-14853, P-33-0014989,
P-33-017754, and P-33-017756)
Page 16: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 12:00:00 PM
listing in
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:25:00 PM
Page 16: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 11:59:00 AM
.
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:06:00 AM
.
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 9:58:00 AM
Page 16: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Table 2
Page 16: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Table 2
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:59:00 PM
revised
Page 16: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:22:00 AM
, as well as identifies which sites fall within the ADI
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
identifies which
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
fall
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:00:00 PM
revised
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
,
Page 16: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:22:00 AM
and also indicates
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
and also indicates
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
as well as
Page 16: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:23:00 AM
those that fall within the ADI
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:12:00 AM
that fall
Page 16: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:00:00 PM
1
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:00:00 PM
0
Page 16: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 12:00:00 PM
Figure
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:05:00 AM
Figure 4
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:05:00 AM
5
Page 16: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 12:00:00 PM
a-d
Page 16: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure
Page 16: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 65
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:05:00 AM
6
Page 16: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 12:00:00 PM
a-d
Page 16: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:59:00 PM
Revised
Page 16: Commented [JC13] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:19:00 AM
Please include report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East, as appropriate.
Page 16: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 12:59:00 PM
Proximity to ADI
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:27:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 10:06:00 AM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:28:00 PM
Within
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:28:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:30:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:30:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:30:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:30:00 PM
Outside
Page 16: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:30:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:31:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:31:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:31:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:31:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:32:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Within
Page 17: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Within
Page 18: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Within
Page 18: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:33:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:34:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:35:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:35:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:35:00 PM
Within
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:35:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:36:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:36:00 PM
Within
Page 18: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:36:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:36:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:36:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
P-33-005323
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
CA-RIV-7394
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Site
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Prehistoric
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Milling slick
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
2006 (S. O’Neil, SWCA); 1994 (W. McManis, TKC)
Page 18: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
OutsideWithin
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Eligible (contributor to MMRD)
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:37:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 18: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:38:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:39:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:12:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:12:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:40:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:12:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Within
Page 19: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 19: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:41:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:00:00 PM
Revised
Page 20: Commented [JC14] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:20:00 AM
Please include report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East, as appropriate.
Page 20: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:01:00 PM
Proximity to ADI
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:44:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:44:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:44:00 PM
Within
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:44:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:44:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 20: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:49:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:47:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:46:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Within
Page 21: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Outside
Page 21: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:45:00 PM
Outside
Page 22: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Within
Page 22: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 22: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 22: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:47:00 PM
Outside
Page 22: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:48:00 PM
Outside
Page 22: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 12:47:00 PM
Outside
Page 23: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:29:00 AM
a
Page 24: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:29:00 AM
b
Page 25: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:30:00 AM
c
Page 25: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:31:00 AM
Figure 5d. Previously recorded sites within the project APE and the 0.5-mile radius of the APE
Figure 6b. Previously recorded isolates within the project APE and the 0.5-mile radius of the APE.
Page 27: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:03:00 PM
5
Page 27: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:31:00 AM
6a
Page 27: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:32:00 AM
Page Break
Figure 6c. Previously recorded isolates within the project APE and the 0.5-mile radius of the APE.
Figure 6d. Previously recorded isolates within the project APE and the 0.5-mile radius of the APE.
Page 31: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:32:00 AM
Page 31: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:12:00 PM
-
Page 31: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:02:00 PM
additional
Page 31: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:27:00 PM
B
Page 31: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:27:00 PM
C
Page 31: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Table 4
Page 31: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Table 4
Page 31: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure
Page 31: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 76
Page 31: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:06:00 PM
7
Page 31: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:27:00 PM
B
Page 31: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:27:00 PM
C
Page 32: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:24:00 AM
(2019-
Page 32: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:27:00 PM
-
Page 32: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:27:00 PM
–
Page 32: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:24:00 AM
2021)
Page 32: Commented [JC15] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:21:00 AM
Please include report included Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East, as appropriate.
Page 33: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:06:00 PM
6
Page 33: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:06:00 PM
7
Page 33: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:03:00 PM
additional
Page 33: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:07:00 PM
2019
Page 33: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:28:00 PM
–
Page 33: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:28:00 PM
/
Page 33: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:07:00 PM
/2020 survey area
Page 33: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 1:07:00 PM
APE
Page 34: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 8
Page 34: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 87
Page 34: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
8
Page 34: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:31:00 PM
revised project area
Page 34: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:31:00 PM
APE
Page 34: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure 8
Page 34: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure Figure 9
Page 34: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 9
Page 34: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure 9
Page 34: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure Figure 10
Page 34: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 10
Page 35: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
8
Page 35: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
7
Page 35: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
8
Page 35: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
9
Page 36: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
9
Page 36: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
10
Page 36: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure 10
Page 36: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:07:00 PM
Figure Figure 11
Page 36: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 11
Page 37: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
10
Page 37: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
11
Page 37: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure 11
Page 37: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure Figure 12
Page 37: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 12
Page 38: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
11
Page 38: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
12
Page 38: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure 12
Page 38: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure Figure 13
Page 38: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 13
Page 39: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
12
Page 39: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
13
Page 39: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure 13
Page 39: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure Figure 14
Page 39: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 14
Page 40: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
13
Page 40: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
14
Page 40: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
14
Page 40: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
15
Page 41: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
14
Page 41: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
15
Page 41: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 4:00:00 PM
Page 41: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure 15
Page 41: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure Figure 16
Page 41: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 16
Page 42: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
15
Page 42: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
16
Page 42: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure 16
Page 42: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
Figure Figure 17
Page 42: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 17
Page 42: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:40:00 AM
The
Page 42: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:40:00 AM
Both
Page 42: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:40:00 AM
both
Page 43: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
16
Page 43: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:08:00 PM
17
Page 43: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:04:00 PM
,
Page 43: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:05:00 PM
-
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:05:00 PM
-
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:05:00 PM
-
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:04:00 PM
.
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:04:00 PM
revised
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:04:00 PM
-
Page 44: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 6:04:00 PM
revised
Page 45: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 8/2/2021 10:25:00 AM
revised
Page 45: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:12:00 PM
In most cases, the previously recorded resources, none of which has been evaluated, could not be found
and likely are either destroyed or located outside the APE. Regardless, these five resources
Page 45: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:10:00 PM
Previously recorded resources that have not been evaluated
Page 45: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:11:00 PM
Page 45: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:26:00 PM
and therefore eligibility recommendations are not provided for them
Page 45: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:08:00 PM
and are not discussed in this section
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
WELL PAD AND SUBSTATION
Page 47: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
PAD
Page 47: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
SITES
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
CULTURAL RESOURCES SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:25:00 PM
Off-site infrastructure, including but not limited to a
Page 47: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
a
Page 47: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
seven
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:26:00 PM
well pad and
Page 47: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
and
Page 47: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:26:00 AM
sites and one electric power
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:26:00 PM
substation, may be required to support the project, but a final design and location have not yet been
identified. This section provides a cultural resources sensitivity assessment intended to inform
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
intended to inform
Page 47: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
covering
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:19:00 PM
the location that will ultimately be added to the APE and ADI.
Page 47: Commented [JC16] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:27:00 AM
As noted above, this need to happen now with the next iteration of this report.
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:31:00 PM
This assessment is based on a desktop review of available scientific literature and previous records
searches from the California Historic Resource Information System (CHRIS) information centers. It
includes a review of the previous survey work, records searches and reports completed for this project in
2006, 2017, and 2020, as well as available unrelated environmental reports conducted in the vicinity.
Historic
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
California Historic Resource Information System (
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
)
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
the
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:13:00 PM
unrelated
Page 47: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:44:00 PM
al
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:31:00 PM
maps and aerial photographs were also examined for historic-era activity within the proposed parcels.
Finally, a geoarchaeological assessment was conducted to assess the buried site sensitivity of the
proposed project areas. A records search and pedestrian survey specific to the proposed areas was not
conducted.
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:14:00 PM
s
Page 47: Commented [JC17] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:28:00 AM
Shouldn’t at least a lit search be conducted for these lands?
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:31:00 PM
The proposed off-site infrastructure study area includes the agricultural lands located in Sections 32, 33,
and 34, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, and Sections 3, 4, and 5, Township 7 South, Range 7 East,
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:20:00 PM
as depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle for Martinez Mountain, California
(Figure 2Figure X18
Page 47: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure X18
Page 47: Commented [JC18] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:30:00 AM
Double check this; only Sections 26, 35 and 36 are delineated in Fig 18.
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:20:00 PM
). The area covers an approximately 1,925 acres generally located between Avenue 60 to the north,
Avenue 64 to the south, Jackson Street on the east, and Jefferson Street on the west. Within this area,
several specific parcels have been identified as likely candidates for well or substation infrastructure (
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:14:00 PM
an
Page 47: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:17:00 PM
see Figure Figure 318
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:20:00 PM
Figure Figure 318, Table 1
Page 47: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 318
Page 47: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:12:00 PM
1
Page 47: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:12:00 PM
5
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:20:00 PM
).
Previous Records Searches and Known Resources
SWCA undertook several records searches as part of the investigations for this project in 2006, 2017 and
2020. These are addressed in detail as part of the associated reports (Sikes and O’Neil 2006; Martinez and
Nicolay 2017) and elsewhere in this document. The record searches were centered on the project APE
west of Monroe Avenue, and while they did not directly cover the off-site infrastructure study area, some
of the results do overlap the study area. Those searches identified 37 previous cultural resources studies
and 98 cultural resources (56 sites and 42 isolates) within a 0.5-mile (0.8-km) radius of the primary
project APE, indicating a high density of cultural resources in and around the areas east of the project
APE in the vicinity of the proposed infrastructure locations.
Page 47: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 47: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 47: Commented [JC19] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:33:00 AM
Do not appear to include resources ID’d in Sections 26, 35 & 36, as noted above.
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
A records search undertaken in 1998 for an unrelated project in the vicinity further identifies the dense
number of archaeological sites in the surrounding area (Figure Figure 419
Page 47: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:47:00 AM
Figure 419
Page 47: Commented [JC20] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:35:00 AM
Fig. shows only Section 26, 35 and 36, in Township 6 South, Range 7 East.
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
).1 One site, CA-RIV-5158, is located within the parcels numbered 10, 12, 13, and 14 in the southwest
quarter of Section 26
Page 47: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:53:00 PM
,
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
Township 6 South, Range 7 East, with three additional sites and at least nine isolates also identified
within the primary project APE (Love et. al 1998).
1 Maps and reports gleaned from sources not directly related to and collected by SWCA for the Travertine project do not always
have complete information. For example, the report by Love et al. 1998 only uses trinomial labels for archaeological sites (they
do not provide the Primary number), and not all resource records were included in the report. A request for information to the
appropriate CHRIS information center would be needed to obtain specific missing records.
Site CA-RIV-5158 was first identified in 1987 by Gallegos et al., as a small ceramic sherd scatter;
however, when it was revisited in 1998 by Love et al., over 170 ceramic sherds were identified, along
with a small scatter of lithic debitage, a quartz core, and a ground stone pestle. The site is currently
mapped as 0.5 mile wide and 0.25 mile long, extending north from Avenue 60.
Figure 3
Page 47: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:53:00 PM
,
Page 48: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:09:00 PM
3
Page 48: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:09:00 PM
18
Page 48: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
. Proposed parcels identified as candidates for the well pad and/or substation location.
Table 1
Page 49: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:12:00 PM
1
Page 49: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:12:00 PM
5
Page 49: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
. Proposed Parcels Identified as Candidates for the Well Pad and Substation Location
Map # APN Land Use Type Acreage
6 764230002 Commercial 9.13
7 764240027 Residential 43.41
8 764230001 Desert 8.3
9 764230003 Desert 9.96
10 764240026 Residential 55.21
11 764230004 Desert 9.1
12 764240006 Farm 38.18
13 764240021 Residential 11.79
14 764240009 Farm 7.2
15 764220028 Farm 39.01
16 764220005 Farm 17.03
18 761300013 Ranch 10.08
19 764320003 Agriculture 19.7
20 764320008 Farm 38.2
21 764320001 Agriculture 18.3
22 764300016 Agriculture 8.55
23 764300017 Agriculture 9.74
24 764300012 Ranch 10.06
25 764300011 Ranch 10.05
26 764300015 Agriculture 9.24
29 764300014 Agriculture 10.09
31 764300004 Farm 117.42
34 764300001 Farm 9.04
36 764300002 Agriculture 11.42
Figure 4
Page 50: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:10:00 PM
4
Page 50: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:10:00 PM
19
Page 50: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
. Project
Page 50: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:13:00 PM
Project
Page 50: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:13:00 PM
L
Page 50: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:13:00 PM
l
Page 50: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
location map of cultural
Page 50: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:13:00 PM
resources
Page 50: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
known to be within the off-site infrastructure study area.
Just south of Avenue 60, in the northwest quarter of Section 35 in Township 6 South, Range 7 East,
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
is another previously recorded site, CA-RIV-5212/H. The site was first recorded in 1987 as
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:17:00 PM
a
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
ceramic sherd scatter with fire
Page 51: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:56:00 PM
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:56:00 PM
-
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
affected rock and a ground
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:56:00 PM
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
stone mano fragment. When it was revisited in 1998, over 500 ceramic sherds were identified, along with
several discrete lithic debitage concentrations, projectile points, and ground
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:56:00 PM
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
stone tools. They also identified a habitation area near the middle of the site. Historic
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:17:00 PM
-era
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
refuse associated with agricultural use of the area was also observed. Considering the location of site CA-
RIV-5158 just across the road to the north, it is likely that the two sites were originally one and represent
an extensive occupation site.
A much smaller site, CA-RIV-6115, is located south of CA-RIV-5212/H. Consisting of just three ceramic
sherds, it is likely associated with activities from a larger site nearby, possibly CA-RIV-5212/H or one
farther east or south. A
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:17:00 PM
similarly sized
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
site, CA-RIV-6113, is located on the edge of the study area, within parcel 31, in the southwest quarter of
Section 35.
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:00:00 PM
Because the site consists of
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
only five ceramic sherds, it is possible that this site is associated with a larger site nearby.
In addition, nine isolates were identified within the northwest quarter of Section 35. Each consists
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
of between one and four ceramic sh
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:18:00 PM
e
Page 51: Deleted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:18:00 PM
a
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
ards and, like CA-RIV-6115 and CA-RIV-6113, may be associated with a larger
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:18:00 PM
nearby
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
site. It is possible that historic
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:18:00 PM
-era
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
agricultural use of the area has moved these sherds from their primary
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:18:00 PM
locations
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:38:00 PM
and these now represent a secondary deposit.
Ethnographic Research
Page 51: Commented [JC21] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:46:00 AM
Shouldn’t this discussion be in the front of this document?
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
The ethnographic context of the
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:33:00 PM
study
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
area is outlined in detail in the 2017 study by Martinez and Nicolay. In sum, the study area is within the
traditional territory of the Cahuilla. The closest ethnographically documented Cahuilla village to the study
area is Mauūlmiī, which was located within the Lake Cahuilla lakebed near the study area. While the
exact location of the village is unknown, archaeologists have tentatively identified CA-RIV-7394 as the
location of Mauūlmiī. This site
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
is southwest
Page 51: Commented [JC22] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:48:00 AM
You mean “southeast” don’t you? SW is in the mts. If this references the off-site facilities study area, one can see
the confusion this broken discussion engenders. Needs to be clarified.
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
of the study area and is a contributor to the MMRD documented in Martinez and Nicolay (2017). Historic
records document the presence of several Indigenous villages across the lakebed and extending up to the
Santa Rosa Mountains, with the U.S.
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:33:00 PM
General
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Land Office
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:06:00 PM
s
Page 51: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:06:00 PM
S
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Surveys of the 1850s identifying four Indigenous villages still present in La Quinta and nearby environs.
Historic
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:07:00 PM
al
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Maps and Background Research
Page 51: Commented [JC23] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:47:00 AM
Shouldn’t this discussion be in the front of this document?
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
A review of historic
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:07:00 PM
al
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
maps indicates that the study area
Page 51: Commented [JC24] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:51:00 AM
Which study area? What figure should we look at?
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
was
Page 51: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:19:00 PM
undeveloped
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
during the mid- to late
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
Page 51: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
-
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
-twentieth century, though the Cahuilla settlement and reservation of Torres was just south of the study
area. The region was heavily traversed, with a well-known desert trail running northwest-southeast
between modern-day Indian Wells and Toro as early as 1901. Known as the Bradshaw Trail, it followed a
similar path to the present-day Highway 111. During the mid- to late
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
Page 51: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
-
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
-nineteenth century, the Bradshaw Trail served as the main thoroughfare between southern California and
the Colorado River until the completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
between
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
1876
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:11:00 PM
and
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
1877.
Settlement of the Coachella Valley began in the 1870s with the establishment of railroad stations along
the Southern Pacific Railroad. By 1883, there were stations at Banning, Beaumont, Cabezon, Whitewater
(later Palm Springs Station), Seven Palms, and Indio. Settlement spread further after public land
was opened for claims under the Homestead Act, the Desert Land Act, and other federal land laws.
The exploitation of underground water sources allowed farming to dominate the economy in the valley,
but it was not until the completion of the Coachella Canal
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:17:00 PM
between
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
1948
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:17:00 PM
and
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
1949 that there was an adequate and reliable water source. The date palm was first introduced around the
turn of the twentieth century and came to dominate agriculture in the area. Starting in the 1920s, the resort
industry began to spread through
Page 51: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:18:00 PM
the
Page 51: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Coachella Valley, bringing resort hotels, equestrian camps, and country clubs, eventually making the area
southern California’s leading winter retreat location (Hruby et al. 2006).
The origin of the City of La Quinta itself is attributed largely to vacationers. The City’s resort industry
was born in the 1920s when Walter H. Morgan opened the La Quinta Resort and Club, originally
designed by renowned architect Gordon B. Kauffman (Hogan et al. 2004). The resort quickly became
popular among Hollywood elite who considered the place a desert oasis. Notably, the first golf course
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
in the Coachella Valley was built at the
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:18:00 PM
r
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
esort. In 1982, when the City officially became incorporated, residents decided to adopt the name of the
premier resort that put them on the map: La Quinta.
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:18:00 PM
Alt
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
hough the area still is known for its resorts and golf courses, it boasts a fairly large permanent population
of just over 40,000 people as of 2015.
European settlement in the area directly around the study area begin in 1877, when a land claim was filed
for the entire Section 34 of Township 6 South, Range 7 East. While unsuccessful, more claims followed
under either the Homestead Act or the Desert Land Act across different sections and parcels under almost
continuous attempts at settlement (Love et al. 1998). By 1918,
Page 52: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:34:00 PM
much of
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
the land in the area was patented. Cultivated land is present in the southeast quarter of Section 34 on a
range map from 1903, with full cultivation of the entire east half of Section 34 by the late 1930s. By
1941, several buildings were present within the study area in the same locations as the buildings present
today. Aerial photos show that many of the agricultural fields began to be abandoned in the latter half of
the twentieth century.
Geoarchaeological Assessment
The study area
Page 52: Commented [JC25] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:54:00 AM
Again, what is this study area? Suggest this too be moved to beginning of document.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
consists primarily of alluvial sediments eroded from the surrounding highlands that have covered
lacustrine sediments from Lake Cahuilla, with the southwestern-most corner of the study area extending
into an alluvial fan. Growth and desiccation of Lake Cahuilla were episodic but occurred numerous times,
and such events can potentially preserve archaeological remains. These differential patterns of
preservation would have varied on both large and small scales within the lakebed and throughout the
Prehistoric period until Lake Cahuilla’s last high water stand in A
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:22:00 PM
.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
D
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:22:00 PM
.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
1500 (Bowersox 1974).
An alluvial fan is present in the southwestern portion of the study area where Guadalupe Creek emerges
from the mountains.
Page 52: Commented [JC26] John Criste 8/11/2021 11:55:00 AM
Shouldn’t reference the NW area? That’s where Guadalupe is.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Alluvial fans are semi-conical landforms with slopes of 2 to 20 degrees that form
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
at the transition from highlands to lowlands through the deposition of sediments by water and gravity
(Williams et al. 2006). The fan in the study area is young, geologically speaking, dating from the
Holocene to recent (11,700 years before present [B
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:23:00 PM
.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
P
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:23:00 PM
.
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
]) (Dibblee and Minch 2008), and therefore may preserve archaeological resources. Within alluvial fans,
grain size decreases downslope, such that the coarsest sediments are found at the apex of the fan near the
channel in the highlands, with progressively finer sediments representing lower energy environments
deposited toward the toe of the fan where
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
it meets the basin or valley floor, such as is present in the study area (Blair and McPherson 1994). These
distal regions of the fan have moderate potential for buried archaeological resources.
The majority of the study area is made up of alluvial sediments that accumulated from the deposition
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
of water-transported sediments, either as part of episodic sheet floods or ephemeral streams and washes.
These sediments are flat-lying across the project area and, combined with the periodic nature
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
of depositional events, have moderate potential for
Page 52: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:22:00 PM
buried
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
archaeological sites. The Lake Cahuilla beds that underlie the alluvial sediments throughout the study
area are generally finer grained and better sorted than alluvium, consisting of clay, silt, and sand
(Morton 1966, 1977). Lacustrine sediments represent
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
a low
Page 52: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:28:00 PM
-
Page 52: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:28:00 PM
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
energy environment with relatively high rates of deposition; thus, the Lake Cahuilla beds underlying the
alluvium have high potential for containing archaeological sites.
A mitigating factor in the likelihood of encountering intact buried resources, at least near the surface,
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
is the agricultural use of
Page 52: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:57:00 AM
a portion of
Page 52: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
the project area. Since the early to mid-twentieth century, agricultural activity almost certainly involved
plowing, which would have disturbed any native surface sediments and displaced archaeological
materials that might have been located within the study area. Although
Page 53: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:57:00 AM
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
no specific figures regarding depth or breadth of plowing activity were identified for historic agricultural
practices in Riverside County or La Quinta, plow zones observed in archaeological contexts elsewhere
Page 53: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:58:00 AM
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
in southern California typically do not extend more than a few feet (less than 1 m) below the surface.
Potential for Historic-
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:30:00 PM
E
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:24:00 PM
ra
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Archaeological Resources
The primary historic-
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:24:00 PM
era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
land use of the study area was agricultur
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:23:00 PM
al
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
. Historic
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:30:00 PM
al
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
topographic quadrangle maps show the progression of European settlement and agricultural development
within the study area. Between 1904 and 1941, maps of the study area show no established buildings or
property boundaries, though several trails are present leading from Toro to the south to Coachella and
Thermal to the northeast. Beginning in 1941, historic
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:30:00 PM
al
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
maps and aerials show several structures, all associated with agricultural development, as well as a few
groves of citrus trees and date palms. This
Page 53: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:59:00 AM
Page 53: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 11:59:00 AM
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
land use pattern has continued
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
to the present. Many of the same structures visible on the historic
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:30:00 PM
al
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
quadrangles and aerials remain extant, although some plots of agricultural land have been abandoned.
Without an updated records search it is unknown how many previously recorded historic
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:23:00 PM
-era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
sites are present within the study area. Considering the long historic record and large number of historic
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:23:00 PM
-era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
resources surrounding the project area, it is likely some historic
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:23:00 PM
-era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
resources are present within the study area. Furthermore, it is possible that historic-
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:24:00 PM
era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
archaeological resources could be preserved below the ground surface, including areas disturbed by
agricultural use, although the probability is higher
Page 53: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 12:00:00 PM
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
in undisturbed or deeply buried sediments. Specifically, there is potential to encounter structural remains,
features, and artifacts associated with the historic
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:24:00 PM
-era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
agricultural or ranching use of the study area beginning in the 1870s. For these reasons, SWCA finds the
project site has a moderate to high sensitivity for containing historic-
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:24:00 PM
era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
archaeological resources.
Potential for Prehistoric and Historic-
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:31:00 PM
Era
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Native American Archaeological Resources
Archaeologists agree that Native American settlements and activity
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:25:00 PM
occurred
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
in higher concentration
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:25:00 PM
s
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
around permanent water sources. One such source was Lake Cahuilla, which was a stable water source
during the late Pleistocene and Holocene, with evidence of the lake up to 40,000 years ago, and with
boundaries that were far larger than its current size. The significance of Lake Cahuilla to the Cahuilla
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
is well documented in ethnographic works and oral history (
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:12:00 PM
Saubel
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:09:00 PM
and Elliott
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
2004). While no record
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:33:00 PM
s
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
search was undertaken for the study area, record searches for other projects did identify several
prehistoric archaeological resources within the western portion of the study area (CA-RIV-5158,
CA- RIV-5212/H, and CA-RIV-6115)
Page 53: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:34:00 PM
,
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
as well as nine isolated finds. Because of the presence of these resources, the location of the study area
within the lakebed, the likely location of Mauūlmiī relative to the project site, and the surrounding dense
archaeological landscape, the study area appears to have a high sensitivity for prehistoric and historic-era
Native American resources. However, the extensive agricultural development since the 1870s reduces the
likelihood of encountering intact prehistoric or historic-period Native American archaeological resources
within the study area. The highest potential for the presence
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
of prehistoric and historic-period Native American archaeological material is in undisturbed (i.e., native)
sediments, which occur below the plow zone. The depth of these sediments has not been confirmed for
the study area. Given these considerations, SWCA finds the sensitivity of the study area
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:30:00 PM
likely has
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
a moderate to high potential for containing
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:26:00 PM
intact
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 2:17:00 PM
prehistoric or historic-period Native American archaeological resources.
Page 53: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:21:00 PM
this
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:21:00 PM
the current
Page 53: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
16
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
37
Page 53: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:40:00 PM
revised
Page 53: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:22:00 PM
, including 12 archaeological sites and 13 isolates.
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:22:00 PM
.
Page 53: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:40:00 AM
Page 53: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:49:00 PM
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 9:40:00 AM
Page 53: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
16
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
37
Page 53: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
10
Page 53: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:35:00 PM
16
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:37:00 PM
P-33-008920,
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:38:00 PM
0
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:38:00 PM
0
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:38:00 PM
0
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:37:00 PM
33-0
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:37:00 PM
P-33-014851, P-33-014852,
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:38:00 PM
0
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:38:00 PM
P-33-014856, P-33-014857, P-33-014858, P-33-014859,
Page 54: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:36:00 PM
six
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:36:00 PM
21
Page 54: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:43:00 PM
One
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:44:00 PM
Six of these have unknown eligibility or have not been evaluated (P-33-001334, P-33-001340, P-33-
001351, P-33-013296, P-33-013297, and P-33-014987). Five sites have been recommended not eligible
for listing in the NRHP or CRHR (P-33-001343, P-33-003875, P-33-003876, P-33-005319, and P-33-
005321), including one site within the ADI (P-33-001343). Ten sites have been recommended eligible.
Nine of these are eligible as contributors to the MMRD (P-33-001331, P-33-003872, P-33-003873, P-33-
003874, P-33-005323, P-33-014844, P-33-014845, P-33-014846, and P-33-014847) and one (P-33-
014988) is individually eligible. None of these occur within the ADI. Six sites (P-33-001334, P-33-
001340, P-33-001351, P-33-013296, P-33-013297, and P-33-014987) have unknown eligibility or have
not been evaluated.
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:39:00 PM
.
Page 54: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:47:00 PM
The five remaining sites (P-33-001334, P-33-001340, P-33-013297, P-33-013296, P-33-014987) have not
been previously evaluated
Page 54: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:59:00 PM
and
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:59:00 PM
but
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:47:00 PM
It should be noted that four of the five resources previously recorded within the ADI (P-33-001340, P-33-
001343,
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:52:00 PM
P-33-013296, and P-33-014987) were not re-located during the field survey and are presumed destroyed
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:53:00 PM
or were originally misplotted and actually occur outside the ADI.
Page 54: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:47:00 PM
Page 54: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:22:00 PM
revised
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:44:00 PM
;
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:44:00 PM
six
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:59:00 PM
In sum,
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:45:00 PM
10
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:27:00 PM
or archaeological
Page 54: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:47:00 PM
have been identified in the revised
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:55:00 PM
have been identified within
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:26:00 PM
the
Page 54: Commented [JC27] John Criste 8/11/2021 12:02:00 PM
This needs to be addressing not only the core APE behind the dike but also the well field area to the east.
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:50:00 PM
However, the project has been redesigned to avoid impacts and effects to eligible resources. The ADI,
which includes all areas proposed for construction (including grubbing, grading
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:45:00 PM
,
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:56:00 PM
or other development), completely avoids all resources
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:45:00 PM
that
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:50:00 PM
are eligible either individually or as contributors to the MMRD. These resources are now located within
designated open space/restricted areas
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:45:00 PM
,
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:50:00 PM
which allows for their long-term protection and conservation. As such, there will be no direct effects to
historic properties or impacts to historical or archaeological resources.
As noted in Martinez and Nicolay 2017, the project will also not result in indirect effects or impacts such
as visual intrusion, vibration from construction
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:27:00 PM
,
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:53:00 PM
or other alterations to the character-defining features
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:53:00 PM
of eligible sites CA-RIV-7394 or contributors to the MMRD.
The areas proposed for an off-site substation and
Page 54: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 1:18:00 PM
s
Page 54: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 12:04:00 PM
seven
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
well pad
Page 54: Deleted John Criste 8/11/2021 12:04:00 PM
pad
Page 54: Inserted John Criste 8/11/2021 12:04:00 PM
sites
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
are considered to have moderate to high sensitivity for containing prehistoric and historic-period
archaeological resources. Once the final locations for the infrastructure have been identified, the locations
should be mapped as part of the APE and ADI and investigated as such, including completion of a records
search at the EIC, an updated Sacred Lands File search, and a pedestrian survey of the parcel or parcels to
confirm the presence or absence
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
of potentially sensitive cultural resources.
Page 54: Commented [JC28] John Criste 8/11/2021 12:05:00 PM
At least portions of this task need to be done now for the SP EIR. It may be permissible for site surveys to be
deferred until specific well and substation sites have been identified for further assessment. Rationale consistent
with CEQA for this deferral should be provided
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
SWCA also recommends continued outreach to local tribes
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
to determine if tribal cultural resources may be impacted. Development of parcels 10, 12, 13, 14, and 31
(as identified in this report) should be avoided, as should work within the western halves of Sections 35
and 26 of Township 6 South
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:48:00 PM
,
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
Range 7 East. If
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
these parcels
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
cannot be avoided, additional archaeological testing
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:50:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
of any known sites to determine boundaries and eligibility for listing
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:51:00 PM
in
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
the
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:51:00 PM
CRHR
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
and
Page 54: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:29:00 PM
NRHP
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:09:00 PM
should be conducted prior to any development activities, and monitoring of all ground-disturbing
activities is recommended.
Page 54: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 3:59:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:02:00 PM
Page 54: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:40:00 PM
Page 55: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 4:50:00 PM
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:11:00 PM
Conduct a supplemental study for the proposed substation and well pad sites and/or any additional
project components not captured within the current APE.
Page 55: Commented [JC29] John Criste 8/11/2021 1:22:00 PM
To have a CEQA compliant analysis we have to evaluated the project as a whole and cannot piecemeal essential
parts like the well sites and substation. APE expansion and associated documentation, maybe sans surveys, needs to
be done now and included in your report and the Project EIR.
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:12:00 PM
Prior to ground
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:53:00 PM
Page 55: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:53:00 PM
-
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:12:00 PM
disturbing activities in any areas outside the currently established APE, including but not limited to
locations proposed for a substation and new well pads, a supplemental study
Page 55: Commented [JC30] John Criste 8/11/2021 1:24:00 PM
This is deferred mitigation.
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:13:00 PM
including
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:13:00 PM
an updated records search at the EIC, updated Sacred Lands File search, and pedestrian survey, shall be
conducted. If resources are identified and cannot
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 55: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:15:00 PM
be avoided, they shall be assessed for their eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Avoidance and
minimization measures identified as a result of the study shall be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan.
Page 55: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:17:00 PM
Although considered unlikely, the discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground
disturbances.
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:54:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Deleted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 56: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 2:55:00 PM
Page 58: Commented [JC31] John Criste 8/11/2021 1:32:00 PM
CVWD (Montgomery) prepared a CEQA/NEPA doc for the Dike 4 (Thomas Levy ) Groundwater Recharge Basins
around 2007-08. Would be a valuable resource.
Page 58: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:17:00 PM
Blair, T., and J. McPherson
1994 Alluvial Fan Processes and Forms. In Geomorphology of Desert Environments, edited by A.
Abrahams and A. Parsons, p. 354–402. Chapman & Hall, London.
Bowersox, J. R.
1974 Paleoecology of Upper Lake Cahuilla, California: Geological Society of America Abstracts
with Programs, Vol. 7, No. 3, p. 146.
Dibblee, T., and J. Minch
2008 Geologic map of the Palm Desert & Coachella 15 minute quadrangles, Riverside County,
California. Dibblee Geological Foundation Map DF-373. Scale: 1: 62,500.
Page 58: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 4:39:00 PM
Hruby, Zachary, Bai “Tom” Tang, Daniel Ballester, and Laura Hensley Shaker
2006 Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties: Mountain View IV Windfarm Project, in
the City of Palm Springs, Riverside County, California. Prepared for Dudek and Associates,
Inc., Bureau of Land Management, Palm Springs-South Coast Office, and Coachella Valley
Water District by CRM TECH, Riverside, California.
Page 58: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:00:00 PM
Morton, P. K.
1966 Geologic map of Imperial County, California: Report 7, California Division of Mines and
Geology, Sacramento, California.
1977 Geology and Mineral Resources of Imperial County, California: County Report 7, California
Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California, 104 pp.
Saubel, Katherine Silva, and Eric Elliott
2004 Isill héqwas wáxish = A Dried Coyote’s Tail. Malki Museum Press, Banning, Califonria.
Page 58: Deleted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:14:00 PM
Page 58: Inserted Michael Bever 8/6/2021 5:14:00 PM
Williams, R., J. Zimbelman, and A. Johnston
2006 Aspects of alluvial fan shape indicative of formation process: A case study in southwestern
California with application to Mojave Crater fans on Mars. Geophysical Research Letters 33:
L10201.
Page 61: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:26:00 PM
A
Page 61: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:26:00 PM
B
Page 62: Deleted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:26:00 PM
B
Page 62: Inserted Michael Bever 8/4/2021 2:26:00 PM
C (CONFIDENTIAL)
Header and footer changes
Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Footnote changes
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
1 Maps and reports gleaned from sources not directly related to and collected by SWCA for the Travertine project do not always
have complete information. For example, the report by Love et al. 1998 only uses trinomial labels for archaeological sites (they
do not provide the P
Page 47: Inserted Michael Bever 8/2/2021 2:16:00 PM
rimary
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
number)
Page 47: Inserted Kerri Linehan 8/6/2021 1:54:00 PM
,
Page 47: Inserted Stephanie Cimino 7/30/2021 5:33:00 PM
and not all resource records were included in the report. A request for information to the appropriate CHRIS information center
would be needed to obtain specific missing records.
Endnote changes
Summary of Comments on Microsoft Word - 12184-04 TIA Report.docx
Page: 17
Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/9/2021 1:29:22 PM If with Jeff St, say so. 2nd ask. Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:29:27 PM Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/9/2021 1:30:38 PM With or w/o Jeff. 2nd ask. Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:30:45 PM Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/9/2021 1:32:04 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:32:18 PM
Page: 19
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:34:10 PM Why was Mad@Ave 60 not analysed? If it is an EVA ONLY, then say so. 2nd ask.
Page: 27
Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/30/2021 11:13:20 AM Please provide cros section of EVA, access drive to NAP parcel and Section 5 access drive on west boundary. Please match cross-sections on TTM Author: clflores Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/30/2021 11:16:33 AM These are not shown on TTM. Unclear if they should be shown on TTM or not shown in TIA. Please review and revise accordingly. Author: clflores Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/30/2021 11:15:46 AM This doesn't match the cross-section on TTM. Please revise to match TTM. Author: clflores Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/30/2021 11:14:48 AM This condition is not shown on the TTM. Please revise based on TTM.
Page: 32
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:41:25 PM This is stil unclear. Is this supposed to say "with and qwithout Project traffic conditions"? 2nd ask.
Page: 34
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:47:55 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:47:26 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:52:38 PM Still confusing. Needs explicit breakout of scenarios, their components and their effects.
Page: 35
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:53:38 PM Again, Madison Street needs to be described here and elsewhere in the report. It must be made clear that Jeff extended is deferred and might not be built at all. Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:54:44 PM Still need cross section. Will Mad have sidewalks?
Page: 45
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/9/2021 1:59:00 PM What is the value of this? Project will take a minimum of 10 years to build. So, shouldnt the "existing traffic volumes" be based on cumulative and ambient growth in background traffic through 2031 to give you real "existing traffic" not a 2019 traffic count that is already out of date.
Page: 87
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/10/2021 1:58:02 PM
Page: 141
Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/10/2021 2:19:20 PM The Project description call for four practice holes of golf only. Please correct. Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/10/2021 2:19:16 PM
Page: 142
Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/10/2021 2:21:37 PM When should this occur? What number of units, etc are a threshold for this improvement? Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/10/2021 2:21:48 PM
Summary of Comments on Microsoft Word - 12184 PA11 LU Review 6.11.2021
Page: 1
Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:13:17 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:13:42 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:14:03 PM Author: admin Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/12/2021 1:15:03 PM This seems inconsistent. So much acreage for so little amenities. Could the designers have it confused? Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:15:39 PM And requirring 46 acres? Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:16:32 PM Author: admin Subject: Highlight Date: 8/12/2021 1:18:13 PM This is well and good. However, it should be put in the revised TIA. Otherwise, we'll be trying to explain inconsistencies and that leads to doubt in the veracity of the analysis......
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS - VMT 8-2021
Main document changes and comments
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:57:00 AM
July 8, 2022
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 9/3/2021 9:42:00 AM
April 14, 2021April 13, 2021
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
April 14, 2021
Page 1: Commented [CF1] Cheri Flores 9/3/2021 9:43:00 AM
Please revise to address the land use changes in PA 11:
Banquet Facility & Restaurant, 10,000sf
Golf Clubhouse, 1,000sf
Golf Academy, 5,500sf
How does this affect VMT?
Page 1: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:08:00 PM
Coral Mountain
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:08:00 PM
Travertine Specific Plan
Page 2: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:29:00 PM
containing a rail transit station served by either bus services or rail transit service, or the
intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes
or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods
1)
Page 2: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:29:00 PM
a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail
transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service
interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods
1)
Page 3: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:46:00 PM
(see Attachment A)
Page 3: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:45:00 PM
A
Page 3: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:45:00 PM
B
Page 3: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
The VMT projections are based upon an updated version of the Riverside County Transportation
Analysis Model (RIVTAM) which became available in the CVAG region during 2016. RIVTAM is
consistent with the SCAG draft 2016 RTP for the CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study
(TPPS) 2040 project.
Travel Demand Models such as RIVTAM are broadly considered to be amongst the most accurate
of available tools to assess regional and sub‐area VMT. While the Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG) maintains the regional travel demand model as a part of the Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy program (RTP/SCS), Riverside County
maintains RIVTAM as a focused version of the regional model in support of travel forecasting
needs of the various agencies and jurisdictions within the County. The latest available version of
RIVTAM has been determined to be the best fit for developing the VMT thresholds as it has the
most up to date land use information for the County, as well as refined zonal structure within the
County.
The 2040 Future Year model scenario is used for the cumulative conditions in the County. The
five other counties included in the model (Ventura County, Los Angeles County, Orange County,
San Bernardino County, and Imperial County) are contributors to the trips to/from Riverside
County during a typical weekday.
Socioeconomic data (SED) and other model inputs are associated with each TAZ. Out of several
different variables in the model SED, the VMT analysis mainly focused on population, households
and employment that are used in the trip generation component. The model runs a series of
complex steps to estimate daily trip productions and attractions by various trip purposes for each
TAZ. The trip purposes are listed below.
1. Home‐Based Work Direct (HBWD)
2. Home‐Based Work Strategic (HBWS)
3. Home‐Based School (HBSC)
4. Home‐Based College and University (HBCU)
5. Home‐Based Shopping (HBSH)
6. Home‐Based Serving‐Passenger (HBSP)
7. Home‐Based Other (HBO)
8. Work‐Based Other (WBO)
9. Other‐Based Other (OBO)
Productions and attractions are computed by RIVTAM for each trip purpose, and trip lengths are
derived for each zone pair from the respective skim matrices in the model to compute the
production and attraction VMT by purpose.
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:49:00 PM
Body Text, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Adjust space between Asian text and
numbers
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 3: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:48:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:51:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:51:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 12 pt
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:52:00 PM
Body Text, Indent: Left: 0.5", Space Before: 4 pt, After: 4 pt, Adjust space between Latin and
Asian text, Adjust space between Asian text and numbers
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:51:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 12 pt, Not Italic
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:51:00 PM
Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri)
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:14:00 AM
Body Text, Space Before: 16 pt, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Adjust space between
Asian text and numbers
Page 4: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:53:00 PM
Normal, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text
and numbers
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:53:00 PM
therefore
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:53:00 PM
, income,
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 5:54:00 PM
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:38:00 PM
population and
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:15:00 AM
Page 4: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:18:00 AM
Consistent with historic modeling of Travertine project, 2.8 persons per household were used
for single family detached homes and 2.6 persons per household were used for duplex residential
units. This results in an overall project average of 2.71 persons per household, which is higher
than the SCAG RTP estimates for the City of La Quinta (2.57 persons per household in 2012 and
2.50 persons per household in 2040), resulting in a conservative analysis.
Page 5: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:12:00 AM
Page 5: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:18:00 AM
Page 5: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:18:00 AM
Page 5: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:19:00 AM
Space Before: 8 pt, After: 8 pt
Page 6: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:13:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:18:00 AM
Page 6: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:44:00 PM
the threshold of
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:07:00 AM
It should be noted that when a project provides a mix of uses that provides additional
opportunities for nearby (and Project) residents to work, recreate, etc., the non‐residential VMT
for an area can decrease. Essentially, residents do not need to travel as far to accomplish their
goals so the regional VMT can decrease.
Page 7: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:03:00 AM
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:13:00 AM
Page 7: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:07:00 AM
Normal, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text
and numbers
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:57:00 PM
alifornia
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 3:57:00 PM
ir Pollution Control Officers Association ‐ CA
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:05:00 PM
On page 58 of the
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:05:00 PM
2010 document,
Page 7: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:05:00 PM
indicates that a
Page 7: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:06:00 PM
referenced as
Page 7: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
Page 7: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
Don't add space between paragraphs of the same style
Page 8: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:09:00 AM
Bullets, Indent: Left: 0.75", Add space between paragraphs of the same style
Page 8: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:08:00 AM
As mentioned previously, when a project provides a mix of uses that provides
additional opportunities for nearby (and Project) residents to work, recreate, etc., the
non‐residential VMT for an area can decrease. Essentially, residents do not need to
travel as far to accomplish their goals so the regional VMT can decrease
Page 8: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:10:00 AM
Font: 12 pt
Page 8: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:13:00 AM
Page 8: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:51:00 PM
to
Page 8: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:52:00 PM
. However, the estimated
Page 8: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:53:00 PM
, which
Page 8: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/13/2021 6:53:00 PM
of 11.03 VMT per resident
Page 1: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:11:00 AM
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:10:00 AM
ATTACHMENT A
LOW VMT AREA SCREENING CALCULATIONS
Page 2: Formatted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:10:00 AM
Heading 6,Appendix
Page 2: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:10:00 AM
B
Page 2: Deleted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:10:00 AM
A
Header and footer changes
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:57:00 AM
July 8, 2022
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 9/3/2021 9:42:00 AM
April 14, 2021April 13, 2021
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
April 14, 2021
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:57:00 AM
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS ‐ VMT 8‐2021
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:56:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx12184‐04 VMT Eval
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:57:00 AM
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS ‐ VMT 8‐2021
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:56:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx12184‐04 VMT Eval
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx
Page 1: Inserted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:57:00 AM
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS ‐ VMT 8‐2021
Page 1: Deleted Cheri Flores 7/8/2022 11:56:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx12184‐04 VMT Eval
Page 1: Inserted Urban Crossroads 4/14/2021 10:20:00 AM
12184‐04 VMT Eval.docx
Text Box changes
Header and footer text box changes
Footnote changes
Endnote changes