RFP Evaluation - GTGREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION
CITY OF LA QUINTA
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Consultant: GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
Reviewer: Cheri Flores
Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 10:45am to 11:45am
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Experience and Qualifications
30
30
Staffing and Scope of Work
30
28
Understanding and Approach
25
24
Unique Qualities
10
7
Presentation/Format
5
3
Total
100
92
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
researched our software, presentation not team focused
imDRUM 9F
experience integrating GIS specifically with Energov
TOTAL 92
Reviewer's Signature
Digitally signed by Cheri L
Flares
Date:2022.09.28
16:13:32-07'00'
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar
work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or
similar.
21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are
included.
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION
CITY OF LA QUINTA
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Consultant: GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
Reviewer: Doug Kinley
Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 10:45am to 11:45am
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Experience and Qualifications
30
29
Staffing and Scope of Work
30
26
Understanding and Approach
25
20
Unique Qualities
10
10
Presentation/Format
5
5
Total
100
90
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
Much better understanding of the field of GIS than seen with other
presentations, but feels a bit too ambitious/overcooked for what our City
requires, we are not a large enough entity to warrant some of these services
or the approach.
imDRU 9F
Excellent work ethic and catering to our City
Work plan is very well tailored to the Client it appears, but a bit too much
for our City it feels.
Staffing is a bit heavy, do we need that many?
Genuine with goods and bads of past work.
TOTAL 90
Reviewer's Signature
Contract Administrator's Initials Date
Scoring Breakdown:
Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar
work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or
similar.
21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are
included.
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION
CITY OF LA QUINTA
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Consultant: GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
Reviewer: Tommi Sanchez
Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 10:45am to 11:45am
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Experience and Qualifications
30
29
Staffing and Scope of Work
30
28
Understanding and Approach
25
24
Unique Qualities
10
8
Presentation/Format
5
4
Total
100
93
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
Trakit to Tyler conversion
Approah with Strategic Planning
Robust Dashboard
imDRUM 9F
Worked with Berkeley, Thousand Oaks and Fremont
Would have liked to hear more from the whole team present.
Phased approach
Has on staff - Trakit to Tyler expert
Purse grant funding
Reviewer's Signature
TOTAL 93
Digitally signed by Tommi Sanchez
r D i1=To,h iSanchento g-La Quinta, ou=HUBManager,
mail=tsanchez@I0270307'.-,c=US
Date: 2022 09 29103J:03 �OJ'00'
Contract Administrator's Initials TS Date 9/28/2022
Scoring Breakdown:
Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very
minimal experience.
11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not
relevant or similar.
21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar
work.
Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum
0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with
similar project.
11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or
similar.
21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform
scope requested.
Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum
0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are
included.
Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum
Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum
0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does
not flow clearly.
2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear
logical order.
4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to
complete a project.