Loading...
RFP Evaluation - INTINIFYREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION CITY OF LA QUINTA GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT Consultant: INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES Reviewer: Cheri Flores Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 9:30am to 10:30am Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Experience and Qualifications 30 30 Staffing and Scope of Work 30 28 Understanding and Approach 25 24 Unique Qualities 10 9 Presentation/Format 5 3 Total 100 94 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): data migration help, presentation timing issues f�s�&4f public outreach capability, master address database, experience with integration with Energov TOTAL 94 Reviewer's Signature Digitally signed by Cheri L Flores Date: 2022.09.28 16:16:12-07'00' Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum 0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION CITY OF LA QUINTA INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES Consultant: INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES Reviewer: Doug Kinley Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 9:30am to 10:30am Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Experience and Qualifications 30 29 Staffing and Scope of Work 30 25 Understanding and Approach 25 25 Unique Qualities 10 7 Presentation/Format 5 3 Total 100 89 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): They have clear collaboration as a team over the years, including a partnership with a consultant that works with them to implement EPL. They completely understand the EPL GoLive process. Feels like a lot of service for a good price tag honestly. imDRUM 9F Clear understanding of items from RFP, forward looking for future software integration such as Asset Management. Understand that the PUBLIC is what's important for GIS to be accessible, not just the Back -End User making "pretty pictures". ctual pictures/presentation of the EPL Software live with GIS integration. utomation is considered for assisting departments. TOTAL 89 Reviewer's Signature Contract Administrator's Initials Date Scoring Breakdown: Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum 0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION CITY OF LA QUINTA GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SUPPORT Consultant: INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES Reviewer: Tommi Sanchez Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 9:30am to 10:30am Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet. Experience and Qualifications 30 29 Staffing and Scope of Work 30 29 Understanding and Approach 25 24 Unique Qualities 10 8 Presentation/Format 5 4 Total 100 94 Unique Qualities (Intangibles): Subcontract with Park Consulting Group- Energov implementation Worked with Desert Hot Springs, Rancho Cordova and Maui imDRUM 9F Scope is highly focused on Energov support. Is an off branch of Interwest. Can provide data conversion. Experience with Riverside county parcel information. TOTAL 94 Digitallysigned by Tommi Sanchez I DN: —Tommi Sanchez, -City of t.a Quinta, —HUB Manager, Reviewer's Signature an -I email=tsanchez@laquintaca.gov,-US Contract Administrator's Initials TS Date 9/28/2022 Scoring Breakdown: Experience and Qualifications - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal experience. 11-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work. Quality of staff for work to be done/Scope of Work - 30 points maximum 0-10 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar project. 11-20 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or similar. 21-30 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope requested. Understanding of work to be done and approach - 25 points maximum 0-10: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements. 11-17: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements. 18-25: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included. Unique Qualities (Intangibles) - 10 points maximum Presentation/Format - 5 points maximum 0-2: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not flow clearly. 2-4: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical order. 4-5: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete a project.